Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/28/2018 - RegularRoanoke County Board of Supervisors INVOCATION: Campus Pastor Ethan Callison Fellowship Community Church June 28, 2018 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board." Page 1 of 5 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda June 28, 2018 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for June 28, 2018. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. and on Sunday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountvVA.gov. Our meetings are closed -captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing to discuss SMART SCALE project applications by Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (Richard L. Caywood, Assistant County Administrator) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution supporting SMART SCALE project applications by Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (David Holladay, Planning Administrator) Page 2 of 5 F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.- 1. ommission: 1. The petition of Laurel Crest, LLC to rezone approximately 3.27 acres from AR, Agricultural/Residential, District to R-3, Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, District, located at 5356 Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District 2. The petition of Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority and Lewis Living Trust to rezone 113.6 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial, District and R-1, Low Density Residential, District to PTD, Planned Technology Development, District, for a Technology Park located on Wood Haven Road and Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to appropriate funds in the amount of $208,917 from the Virginia Department of Social Services for the County of Roanoke Department of Social Services and add four new benefit programs specialist positions to the County's Classification and Pay Plan (Joyce Earl, Director of Social Services; Christopher R. Bever, Director of Management and Budget) 2. Ordinance amending Ordinance 0-082218-5, fiscal year 2018-2019 Operations Budget for Roanoke County Public Schools, to account for additional funding in the amount of $567,792 from the Commonwealth of Virginia (Mrs. Penny Hodge, CPA, SFO, Assistant Superintendent of Finance and Operations, RCPS; Christopher R. Bever, Director of Management and Budget) 3. Ordinance declaring surplus and authorizing sale of 2 parcels totaling .505 +/- acres of real estate located at 3319 and 3323 Westmoreland Dr., Cave Spring Magisterial District (Ruth Ellen Kuhnel, County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFAC) (appointed by District and At -Large) 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) 3. Library Board (appointed by District) 4. Planning Commission (appointed by District) Page 3 of 5 CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes —April 24, 2018 2. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Jerrold T. Greene Jr., Police Officer IV, upon his retirement after nineteen (19) years of service 3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Allen Thompson, Business Systems Analyst III, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service 4. Confirmation of appointment to Roanoke County Planning Commission (District); Length of Service Awards Program (LOSAPNIP)(At-Large) J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of May 31, 2018 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of May 31, 2018 5. Accounts Paid — May 31, 2018 L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to update the Board of Supervisors on the strategic direction of Economic Development in the County of Roanoke (Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development) 2. Work session to update the Board of Supervisors on the May 27, 2018, storm damage and response (Richard L. Caywood, Assistant County Administrator) Page 4 of 5 M. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: 1. Section 2.2-3711.A.3 Discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for a public purpose or of the disposition of publicly held real property, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body, namely Westmoreland Drive EVENING SESSION N. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION O. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution waiving Building Permit Fees for citizens affected by weather events of May 27, 2018 (Tarek Moneir, Acting Director of Development Services) P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. to rezone approximately 2.1256 acres from C -2C, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial, District, to remove proffered conditions, and to obtain a special use permit for a mini -warehouse facility, located at 5881 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) Q. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. P. Jason Peters 2. George Assaid 3. Phil C. North 4. Joseph P. McNamara 5. Martha B. Hooker S. ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: June 28, 2018 Briefing to discuss SMART SCALE project applications by Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization SUBMITTED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Staff will provide a briefing to the Board of Supervisors detailing proposed transportation projects submitted for funding consideration by the Commonwealth of Virginia SMART SCALE program. BACKGROUND: The SMART SCALE program provides methods and procedures for scoring and funding transportation projects in the Commonwealth of Virginia. According to the SMART SCALE Technical Guide, "The purpose of SMART SCALE is to fund the right transportation projects through a prioritization process that evaluates each project's merits using key factors including: improvements to safety, congestion reduction, accessibility, land use economic development and the environment. The evaluation focuses on the degree to which a project addresses a problem or need relative to the requested funding for the project." The deadline for submitting SMART SCALE project applications is August 1, 2018. Attached is a PowerPoint presentation of proposed SMART SCALE projects located within Roanoke County, under consideration by both Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: Staff will bring forward a resolution under New Business asking the Board of Supervisors to support and adopt both the Roanoke County and Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization SMART SCALE applications. Page 2 of 2 00 0 N 00 N N c C6 O N a -J a -J V V � �� 0 Q Q C6 � � O 0 a- _0 _ c ate-+ dJ .� E O N O OLo4-JO o0 Q O C Q -0 O ca N N Lr) N ca ca -0 r r--1 O ro ON bb cnO a- o N r N E Ln . — ca o EN O r N Q) s ca N C: O ' o a -J .V Q Q N D ' C6 Q 4-J 4-J Q — Ln LLI `n Q (L)' O N O O Q O 'i�� U U 3 V 4, n W � � Q V 0 V Q• Q • •0 a --r i Q o QV1 • • • NNS N U O � > O O O Ca O �CE .� C: O 0.O W O fu C6 i C6 O a--+ a--+ O �.E Q O NN Ln C — C: E O Q 1� L n O ry 810:,'OE hY4 1 uoi}eailddy aleoS liewS OZ Ad SIUDWanoidwi ueU}sapad peon{ UOSWUHHAA 33°r` 10 E > O Q E O ry Q > U O 06 a� E a� O E O ry U i H i 0 V ._ CL H i l �� '`+ `� e ,�+ �\ � �cl � b/�1r �� A El ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: June 28, 2018 Resolution supporting SMART SCALE project applications by Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution to support transportation project funding requests under the Smart Scale program. BACKGROUND: The deadline for submitting SMART SCALE applications to the Virginia Department of Transportation is August 1, 2018. In a briefing to the Board of Supervisors, staff reviewed the proposed projects and applications that both Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization plan to submit. Proposed projects are enumerated in the "discussion" section below. The PowerPoint presentation describing each project is attached to this report. After review of the proposed projects, the Board of Supervisors will consider a resolution supporting both lists of projects. DISCUSSION: Proposed SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke County Application Page 1 of 2 Route 419 and Route 220 Diverging Diamond Interchange Williamson Road Pedestrian Improvements McVitty Road Improvements Old Cave Spring Road Improvements Proposed SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization Application Interstate 81 Northbound Improvements / Exit 140 to Exit 141 Interstate 81 Southbound Improvements / Exit 141 to Exit 140 Interstate 81 Southbound Improvements / Exit 150 through Weigh Station Orange Avenue Improvements from 11th Street to Gus Nicks Boulevard FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution supporting SMART SCALE applications. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SMART SCALE APPLICATIONS BY ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE ROANOKE VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on June 28, 2018, the Board of Supervisors reviewed proposed SMART SCALE project applications; and WHEREAS, the list of projects includes both Roanoke County applications, and Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization applications; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to support both local and regional projects to mitigate congestion, promote economic development, increase accessibility, safety, and environmental quality, as well as develop projects consistent with local land use policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke County application: a. Route 419 and Route 220 Diverging Diamond Interchange b. Williamson Road Pedestrian Improvements c. McVitty Road Improvements d. Old Cave Spring Lane Improvements Page 1 of 2 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization application: a. Interstate 81 Northbound Improvements / Exit 140 to Exit 141 b. Interstate 81 Southbound Improvements / Exit 141 to Exit 140 c. Interstate 81 Southbound Improvements / Exit 150 through Weigh Station d. Orange Avenue Improvements from 11th Street to Gus Nicks Boulevard 3. That the Clerk to the Board forthwith send a certified copy of this Resolution to Senator Mark Warner, Senator Timothy Kaine, Representative Bob Goodlatte, Representative Morgan Griffith, and Commonwealth Transportation Board member Court G. Rosen. 4. That this resolution is effective immediately. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 The petition of Laurel Crest, LLC to rezone approximately 3.27 acres from AR, Agricultural/Residential, District to R-3, Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, District, located at 5356 Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading on this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for July 24, 2018. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Laurel Crest, LLC to rezone approximately 3.27 acres from AR, Agricultural/Residential, District to R-3, Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, District, located at 5356 Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for July 24, 2018. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke For Staff Use Only Community Development Date received: Received by: Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Uri -re Application fee: PCBZA date: - P 0 BOX 29800 Placards issued: BOS date: Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX(540)776-7'155 Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ElRezoning []Special Use []Variance ❑Waiver E] Administrative Appeal []Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: Laurel Crest, LLC Work: 540.204-4247, ext 106 PO Box 20886 Cell #: Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: RF02017 Land, LLC Work: 540-2044247, ext 106 PO Box 20886 Fax No. #: Roanoke, VA 24018 Property Location 5356 Indian Grave Road Magisterial District: Cave Spring Roanoke, VA 24018 09 V.bk - 6k -6'3, bo - v Community Planning area: Not included in any CP study area. Tax Map 1098.01-01-02.00-0000 Existing Zonitt g AR -Agricultural/Residential Size of parcel(s): Acres: 3.2-7 Existing Land Use: Single Family Home RF,ZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: R-3 Medium Density Residential Proposed Land Use: Townhomes 2D units) and Single Family Attached (2 units) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes M No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS. REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes✓❑ No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No❑✓ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W"/AA), Variance/Waiver of Seetion(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/SIWICP V/AA Consultation ✓ 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan In/ Application fee ✓ Application Metes and bounds description ✓ Proffers, if applicable ✓ Justification Water and sewer appl' ion ✓ Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the operty or the o er' aent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. 1 i Owner's Signature JUSTIFICATION FOR .REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (i5.2-2232) REVIEW REQITES'I'S Applicant Laurel Crest, LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please_explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See attached justification packet. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. See attached justification packet. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. See attached justification packet. 3 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The.County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL ,'APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X g. All property lines and easements X h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development X j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS X k. Existing utilities (.water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers X _ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants X p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed NIAq. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule :1 I certify that all items-requirbd in foie checklist above are complete. f Signature of applicant; Date C May 11, 2018 Board of Supervisors & Planning Commission of Roanoke County 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 Attn: Mr. Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning Re: Laurel Crest Townhomes R3 - Townhome Rezoning Request Tax Parcel #098.01-01-02.00-0000 & 098.01-01-03.00-0000 Dear Mr. Thompson, Laurel Crest, LLC is requesting to rezone Tax Parcels #098.01-01-02.00-0000 and 098.01-01-03.00-0000 from AR Agricultural/Residential to R3 Residential to allow for the development of a townhome subdivision. The site is approximately 3.27 acres, and is located on Indian Grave Road Southwest, in the vicinity of Clearbrook Elementary School and virtually adjacent to LewisGale Family Medicine. This makes it an ideal living opportunity for families and retirees alike, which is consistent with population trends in Roanoke County. As you are aware, the Roanoke County 2005 Comprehensive Plan, as well as a 2012 Future Land Use Guide, both identify a need for various housing types to meet the current and future demand of the County. These plans further identify that densities currently allowed in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will need to be utilized to allow the types of housing which will provide Roanoke County the diversity in housing that it seeks. To that end, we are requesting this rezoning and it is our pleasure to propose Laurel Crest. This community will provide excellent living opportunities in the desirable Roanoke County community. This new community will consist of a maximum of 22 new townhomes. Laurel Crest will include 20 two- story style townhomes and 2 patio style townhomes. Laurel Crest will mandate a commitment to the aesthetic quality and architectural design of the nearby neighborhoods of the County. The property will be resubdivided per the Concept plan if the proposed rezoning is approved and the existing single family dwelling will remain. The site is ideally located along the edge of the Clearbrook Village Overlay District and the proposed use is an excellent transitional use between the commercially zoned properties to the Northeast and the, residential use to the South West. According to the Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District (2000), the parcel is designated as a Secondary Area and directly adjoins the Primary Area. Because Laurel Crest is contiguous to an area designated for high intensity urban development, Roanoke County's Future Land Use Guide (2012) designates the property for Transition land use. Accordingly, the proposed townhome community is an ideal development for furthering the goals of the County. The property proposed for rezoning is immediately south of a portion of the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District. As such, this new community has been designed to respect the Design Guidelines published in 2000 for that district. Laurel Crest will provide housing that will be aesthetically consistent with surrounding communities and businesses. In keeping with the Design Guidelines published in 2000, we are proffering design standards that will cover many aspects of the development Page 1 of 7 including but not limited to lighting, signage, landscaping, and architecture. We have also included examples (Exhibit B) of the styles of townhomes that we plan to offer the Roanoke County community. We understand that areas within the viewshed of the Blue Ridge Parkway must be sensitive to preserving the surrounding landscapes enjoyed by users of the Parkway. Our community will be 0.7 miles from the closest point of the Parkway. Our site due diligence determined that the community is not a material impact to the Parkway viewshed (Exhibit C). In fact, unlike many other buildings in the area, there is only one spot along the Parkway where one may see the edges of Laurel Crest and it would require an illegal parking presence on a small grassy section of the Parkway. The property will be served by public water and public sewer, which makes it more appropriate for the proposed zoning. Stormwater management and quality will be provided as required by applicable regulations. Per the Roanoke County guidelines, the proposed land use is not considered high traffic. The Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Station is located adjacent to the subject property and will conveniently provide services to this property. The schools serving this community will be Clearbrook Elementary, Cave Spring Middle School and Cave Spring High School. Using the following model the anticipated number of school age children is approximately nine (9) children: [22 (# of proposed dwelling units)] x [2.55 (persons/household)] x 15% _ # of school aged children. We are confident that this new community will further the goals set by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, meet a market need for new homes, and be a welcomed addition to the community. We look forward to the opportunity to bring new housing to Roanoke County. We have included a preliminary development plan (Exhibit A) showing the layout and are proffering substantial conformance to it. We are excited to present Laurel Crest to the Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors, and the Roanoke County citizens. As a Roanoke County based business, we are excited to have the opportunity to be a catalyst for growth in Roanoke County. We remain committed to providing Roanoke County with all information necessary to consider this request and welcome input from all interested parties. Please feel free to contact us directly with any questions. Sincerely, Robert P. Fralin, Managing ember of Laurel Crest, LLC Page 2of7 VICINITY MAP Page 3 of 7 �G • `yrs ,• ..• CIQ•Ybrook G9erxbrwk. Park �OpO , • . .�i •r O � 04• �= �� ,• #/ Creod�rculr i FJJ eAg dOil / { �� fy • , J 'J A i , Page 3 of 7 DRAFT PROFFER STATEMENT The applicant hereby agrees to proffer the following conditions as part of the rezoning request for Tax Parcels 098.01-01-02.00-0000 & 098.01-01-03.00-0000: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the development pattern shown on attached concept plan "Laurel Crest Townhome Concept Plan" (Exhibit A) dated 5/17/2018, subject to necessary modifications as may be required by regulatory agencies. 2. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 18 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, shall be down -lit or shielded so as not to direct glare onto adjoining streets or residential properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. In addition, the light source from any security lighting shall not be visible from adjoining residential properties. 3. The community sign shall be a freestanding monument sign that shall not exceed 7 feet in height or 10 feet in width. The sign shall be channel lit, ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. The sign will complement the townhome style, and materials such as exposed standard concrete block, metal, or brightly colored siding will not be used. The color of the sign shall be in the earth tone color range. 4. The use of native species shall make up a minimum of 50% of the planting materials. Trees shall measure a minimum of 2 1/2 inches in caliper, and shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, at time of planting. Three shrubs shall be planted in front of every townhome and three trees shall be planted at the end of each townhome row. 5. No visible flat or shed roofs shall be used. The maximum height of structures shall not exceed thirty-five (35 feet). Siding materials such as exposed standard concrete block, metal, or brightly colored siding will not be used. Materials shall be in the earth tone color range. Si na ure and printed �ame of State of Virginia County of Roanoke to Wit: rty owner Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this r day of mck 2Olt by Printed name of property owners �} My commission expires: l� a i Ub2 Date j �102�1 14 �L�K' Notary Public printed name and registration number Notary Ore Taltlln arle Barrell Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Public Commission No. 77574 Page 4 of 7 M , ^ommission Expires 121311 ,,n�-1- ADJACENT PROPERTIES Northern Property Boundary Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors 199133is*t-010I11 Roanoke, VA 24018 TM# 098.01-01-01.00-0000 Zoning: C2 1.98 Acres Shepherd Properties Roanoke, LLC 2320 Maiden Ln, SW Roanoke, VA 24015 TM# 098.02-02-01.00-0000 Zoning: C2 5.58 Acres Southern Property Boundary Walters, Kenneth J. 5394 Indian Grave Rd. Western Property Boundary Evangel Foursquare Church Trustees 2360 Hardy Rd. Vinton, VA 24179 TM# 098.02-02-16.00-0000 Zoning: C2 48.65 Acres Lumsden, Newton Denver; Lumsden, Mary Ellen 5410 Indian Grave Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 TM# 098.01-01-08.00-0000 Zoning: AR 2.89 Acres Roanoke, VA 24018 TM# 098.01-01-06.00-0000 and 098.01-01-04.00-0000 Zoning: AR 1.05 Acres Walters, Kenneth J. 5394 Indian Grave Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 TM# 098.01-01-04.00-0000 Zoning: AR 0.07 Acres Page 5of7 3F 4 3 F Bai a m vlNlJWISICI VNIUdS 3AV3 ul bl I 8I y § 8 ¢@ q 101alslO °wads 3nVo NVId id30N00 6 $ & € y LL OV08 3AVaO NVIONI ZLC9 V asee m S3WOHNMO11S3N3l31jnvi a a W $ ! ' I 1 I ' I 1 \ 1 ' 1 � 1 •:. A V 1 ��1�-1 1 , A 1 I I "Mn p y' \�21 S$1 jl \ \ ` �\ '\1 I1 } ¢��311 11 ' �,• '11 ; \1 11 \ ,, 112"\ \ `\\ `\\ ``\ `, \ ,\ \\ \` \, \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ `\ 1 I 1 zll 1 1 1 I$ 115° it `` ' 1'1\ \� 1\I f' / f /� 11 I I I • � I I I�n � Q } 1 }�c�. ,\ `\\� \ ` ¢ `\\ \\ \ \\ `\\` `\\\\ \ l l 1 1 I I ` / / • r // I `\ , 1 1 1 �uns� ` 1 `` � g a \ l 1 1 1 1 1 \ , ` I I I ' • ' ' \ ' `. `.\3.1 `- I4c`•Si I 1 1 1 '1 11 } ; ���. 1} I H•I1 r ui If rz 4 � fi � /,f i; � 111 i \I I '' } 1 I. � II �•i�� 1' I1 '\ } '\I 11 11 II \. 11, \\ /� // ,' 1 �i i i .' �' i� '� ' �I I I 4 ��• } \ 1`1 `I, 11 `\ `\ `` \, \, Il Il I _ I I _ , I g d � Ld Az9 e aa� Q m z ti g a f g F i U _� ra Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 EXHIBIT 13: TOWNHOME STYLES Page 7 of 7 Ou eee eeu eek aee eee ue � semen' u� �e1 aee e:a R�kIM �eifl@Mfl . U U Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT C: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY PHOTO 5356 Indian Grave Viewshed t�. k - ,+^�" � t � Legend f wmeatlescnpuon for y— map � _ �'{�y*'4 Part of Tax Map No: 098.01-01-02.00-0000 and 098.01-01-03.00-0000 PARCELI BEGINNING at an iron pipe in Mrs. LeeYate's line and being the northeast corner of Harry Pickel's residence lot, and with Pickel's line N. 48'42'W. passing 2 feet south of a black oak at 8' all 303 feet to an iron on the west side of a 20 foot roadway in the line of Jessie W. Simmons and with Simmon's line running along the west side of said 20 foot roadway, N. 14'49' E. 239 feet, N. 47° 36' W. 16 feet to a point in State Secondary Road 675; and thence with a new line, N. 26` 11'E. 44 feet to a point in the road, S. 53` 11' E. to an iron pipe at 27.3 feet, all 386.6 feetto an iron pipe, S. 46' 21' E.190 feet to an iron pipe in Mrs. LeeYate's line, and with her. line, S. 69' 46'W. 311 feet to the BEGINNING; and BEING 2.78 acres as shown on that plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Courtfor the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 872, page 575. PARCEL 2 BEGINNING at a point in the center of the Indian Grave Road, being State Sec. Route No. 675, the point of BEGINNING; thence S. 47` 36'E. 38.93 feet to a point; thence with the line of the present Sam. R. Webb property, 5.14° 49' W. 290.85feet to a point; thence with the line of a 0.074 acre tract being conveyed to Gertrude M. Pickle, N. 55'W. 124.96 feet to a point in the center of Va. State Sec. Route No. 675; thence with the center of Va. State Sec. Route No. 675, N. 35' 30' E. 124.60 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Va. State Sec. Route No. 675, N. 29" 23' E. 154.15 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and containing 0.49 acre; and being shown by survey dated June 21, 1973, made by Jack G. Bess, CLS, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 978, page 641. W E S T E R N V I R G I N I A WATER AUTHORITY/ Engineering Services Availability # 18-164 May 16, 2018 Address: 5356 INDIAN GRAVE RD & 5372 INDIAN GRAVE RD Accounting Code: Roanoke County Tax Map Number(s): 098.01-01-02.00-0000 & 098.01-01-03.00-0000 Card #:NONE Contact: Chris Burns 772-9580 Prepared by: Mitch Eakin, Utiltiy Planner 540 283-2996 This letter has been generated without an approved plan. Based on the information that has been provided to the Western Virginia Water Authority, public water and sewer can be made available to this proposed parcel under certain conditions as outlined below. The design engineer is responsible to verify the water and sewer requirements for any development. All costs associated with the design and construction of the public water and sewer improvements required to serve this new parcel will be the responsibility of the owner/developer. A more detailed Availability Letter outlining specific fee's associated with connecting to the public water and sewer systems will be provided in conjunction with the site plan review process. WATER: Water can be provided to the Property by connection to the existing 8" public water main located in Indian Grave Rd. The hydraulic grade line of the existing 8" waterline in is HGL 1410. It is the owner/developers responsibility to ensure that the existing water system can provide the necessary flow and pressure required for the proposed deveiopment on this parcel. Depending on how Property is developed the internal water service could be either private or public, and this would be determined at the time of site plan approval. SEWER: Sewer can be provided to the Property by connection to the existing 8" public sanitary main located in Indian Grave Rd. Depending on how Property is developed the sewer service could be either private or public, and this would be determined at the time of site plan approval. Depending on the time of development the developer could be required to participate in an upgrade to the Clearbrook lift station if proposed development plans are determined to exceed the capacity of the lift station. Our Mission is Clear 601 South Jefferson Street • Suite 300 • Roanoke VA 24011 540-853-5700 • www.westernvawater.org _ F r 1 1 A �{ Q� Owe Pim bi�Ni Nit rn > > Q iv NU) O CO rn rn 0 s (1) o N V V (6 3 0000 O U II r C C Q o o (u (u U Q rn F-> c - m 'c C C z N N �� X00 m ° m N _0 o a) Z N m U) O N N O CLO O X00 .. N LO rl UU _ N � _ 0 0's 200 N N _ Ce)^ Qj .N Q O Q� O'6 X W 00 1Ce) 1^ VJ VJ CL Q J W d d N H 00 Q 2 °e.�; 3 0 J � 0 o o / \ \ / 1=2 > oo - E E J \ < 00 \ 9 90 § a— .. X66 \ -0 -0 [S ® 1an)� gg f m r e o > E E p ] \ A / a ) ) ƒ= J / / » (D C \ 6 = 9 9 9' LO rl_ cL ® \ \ \ co co / -: LO LO f] j ƒ\ Foo # / 3 0 J 9 o ��2 A/� a � Q o o o / \ \ / E kU oo - E J \& 9 cu < § a« ..\\ X66 - \ 0-0 [S c I 6E I.)g g m r e\ o > E E p \ A ¥ / a ) ) 2 ƒ J / / » ' \ 6 = = 9 9 9 \ \ \ -o { \ \ \ � � % ] 2 § § \ a G G # ! ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 The petition of Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority and Lewis Living Trust to rezone 113.6 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial, District and R-1, Low Density Residential, District to PTD, Planned Technology Development, District, for a Technology Park located on Wood Haven Road and Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading on this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for July 24, 2018. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority and Lewis Living Trust to rezone 113.6 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial, District and R-1, Low Density Residential, District to PTD, Planned Technology Development, District, for a Technology Park located on Wood Haven Road and Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for July 24, 2018. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 2, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Pte_ \1g0Vaa9 For Staff Use Only Community Development Date received;Rece'ved by: Planning & Zonin -1I -� 18 A plication fee: , LiZb4.— PC1t3Z-A date; 7- r o - I g 5204 Bernard Drive Placards issued: DOS date: P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 7- 2 -1 -is (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Case lumber -...ao ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ® Rezoning O Special Use ❑ Variance ❑'Waiver Q Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plain (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: Work: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Cell M Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Fax No. #: Property Location Magisterial District: Catawba SEE ATTACHED SHEET Community Planning area: Peters Creek/ Hollins Tax Map No.:SEE ATTACHED SHEET Existin zoning. "1 ow lntensity Industrial District g g R-1 Low Densitv Residential District Size of parcel(s): Acres: _ !,,13-6 Existing Land Use: Vacant, residential_, age icuZtural REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT; WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (WS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: PTD, Planned Technology Development District Proposed Land Use: Technology Park Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes N No n IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes IR No 5 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes n No n VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIWIAA) Variance/Waiver of Sections) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of interpretation ofSection(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACGXWEDI Y OFIM ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SAV/CP VlAA WS(W/CP VIAAI RIMV/CP WAA V 112011 Consultation 8 ItT' x I V concept pian A anon fe Ay Application1�4 Metes and bounds descriptionf��H P , if Justification Water and sewer application Adj ' property owners I hereby certify that I am either the ovine of the rty �r the owner's gent or contract purchaser and with the Iutowle consent f the owner. VIES iE GI g, fit ; OWE i1 SW[ L FACILI'T'Y AUTHORITY / By: Eii�ynetn L)ougnty,()txecutive llirector LEWIS LIVfNG TRUST DATED AUGUST 17, 2016 ,�t3 a1�.4'a „ ^ Owner's Signature Stafform Eewis, Sr., Co-Truslee 2 ATTACHMENT TO REZONING APPLICATION FILED BY WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY AUTHORITY ANIS THE LEWIS LIVING TRUST A licants' names /addresses rvfi Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority P. 0. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 Thane: (540) 343-1550 Fax No.: (540) 344-6096 Lewis Living Trust dated August 17, 2016 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540) 992-4534 Fax No.: None Owners' names/addresses w/zips As to Tax Map Parcel Nos 026.18-01-13.00-0000 026.18-01-14.00-0000 026.17-01-01.00-0000 026.17-01-02.00-0000 026.17-01-03.00-0000 Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority P. 0. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 As to Tax Mau Parcels Nos 026.18-01-12.00-0000 026.18-01.12,02-0000 026.18-01-12.01-0000 Lewis Living Trust dated August 17, 2016 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Pr.o.perty_Lomflons Tax Man NRs.Act Existing onang 7627 Wood Haven Road 026.18-01-13.00-0000 19.09 I-1 7629 Wood Haven Road 026.18-01-14.00-0000 15.93 I-1 0 Wood Haven Road 026.17.01-01.00-0000 16.33 R 1 7755 Wood Haven Road 026.17-01-02.00-0000 2.35 R 1 7911 Wood Haven Road 026.17-01-03.00-0000 43.95 R-1 7222 Thirlane Road 026.18-01-12.00-0000 11.14 I-1 0 Thirlane Road 026.18-01-12.02-0000 3.29 I-1 0 Thirlane Road 026.18-01-12.01-0000 1.52 1-1 JUSTI ]CATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL usE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (ts.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS ApplicantmWiaRly The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification In the Zoning Ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEET Please explain how the project conforras to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Alan, SEE. AT?'ACHED SHEEN' Please describe the itnpact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining propertics, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. SEE ATTACHED SHEET 3 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKL1511' A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application, The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d, Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to [lie development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1, Any driveways, entrancoaiexits, curb openings rand crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals m Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q, If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that alf items required in the checklist above are complete. WES G IA %ivDUSTRiAL FACILITY AUTHORITY S May 11, 2018 Signs'Uregapplicant KizabUth Wughty, Executive Director Date LEWIS LIVING TRUST DATED AUGUST 17, 2016 A0 ei L Staf rd Lewis, Sr., o -Trustee Date 0'r, Community DevelopmentPlanning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OI' NEED FOR +TRAFFIC .ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Name this fist /s not Inclusive and the County staff and MOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/4601, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc,) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that Is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 99, ZAPS 7 a Community Development Planning & Zoning Division I�31S NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REzONING, SUBDMSION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCC PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning; Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or in outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning; Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow SliffrCiOnt tine for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandurn by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning} Commission sliall consult with planning; staff to determine ifa continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL GF NEED FOR TRAI -tC ANALYSES AND/DR. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a fist of potential laird arses and situalion-Y that woulcl necessitate fu ther'stttelp is prov1c1ed cis' part of'this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient tirne for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning ConrnkSioi1, If a coistinrlance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April f9, 2095 WOOD HAVEN TECHNOLOGY PARK Name of Petition WL:S [ ' [RG NtA REGI A1. r TRIAL FACILITY AuTmRITY RV: Petitioner's Signa e E zabet Doughty Executive Director Date LEWIS LIVING 'I'1mUs,r DATED AUGUST I7, 2016 Petitioner's Signature A�2cL IS, ,d010 Date I JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.22332) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicants: Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority and Lewis Living Trust Dated August 17, 2016 Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The Planned Technology District ("PTD") was established primarily for Type I and Type 11 manufacturing and industrial uses. The 15 -acre minimum district size and the emphasis placed on controlling access points and the siting of buildings, as well as developing mechanisms to promote an aesthetically pleasing and functional planned development make the PTD zoning district the appropriate district for the Wood Haven Technology Park. The over 100 acres of the Wood Haven Technology Park have been intentionally acquired by the Western Virginia Regional Industrial Authority (the "Authority"). The Authority was formed by six regional governments (the Counties of Roanoke, Botetourt and Franklin, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton). The purpose of the Authority is to provide a mechanism for its member jurisdictions to cooperate regionally on economic development projects. Its formation was spurred by the recognition that our region lacks prepared, industrial sites of fifty (50) acres or more. Companies with the proven potential to bring high quality jobs to our area but needing 50 to 100 acres of assembled, developable space were simply bypassing our region. The same issue is affecting competitiveness statewide. Virginia created the Virginia Business Ready Sites Program to encourage the development of larger sites (sites of at least 100 acres). The Authority has already been supported by investment through the Virginia Business Ready Sites Program, Soon after its formation, the Authority engaged engineers to study potential development sites. More than 165,000 regional sites were studied. The parcels went through a screening process for factors such as slope, geology, zoning, threatened and endangered species, road access and utilities. Less than 2,000 parcels of the 165,000 studied qualified for further analysis. Another phase of evaluation followed. After consideration of potential return on investment and a regional ranking by local economic development directors, the Wood Haven site emerged as the Authority's first priority for development. As detailed in the application, the Authority already owns five of the eight tax map parcels which are the subject of this rezoning request and the Lewis Living Trust dated August 17, 2019 (the "Trust") owns three. The Trust has joined the Authority in this rezoning application as a co -applicant. Both the Trust and the Authority 1 anticipate that the Trust property will be conveyed to the Authority at an agreed- upon time. By GIS records, the acreage of the parcels seeking rezoning totals 113.6. By survey, the total acreage is 109.9. To assist the Authority in its development of a master plan for the property, a series of three community meetings were held. Opportunities for the site were discussed, along with issues and concerns. To address concerns of neighbors along and off Wood Haven Road, the master plan for Wood Haven Technology Park (Exhibit A) pushes the boundary of the development area away from Wood Haven Road as much as possible and towards 1-81 and I-581 which the site borders, reducing the development area size to approximately 87 acres. A significant buffer area is provided along Wood Haven Road. If the buffer area is disturbed by grading, infrastructure or utility installation, it will be revegetated. Otherwise, it will remain undisturbed. In addition to the buffer area, a berm will be provided within the 87 acre development area. The height of the berm will vary for aesthetics but its height should not exceed five feet from the height of the development pad itself. The Master Plan delineates the permitted uses within the Technology Park. As the PTD ordinance provides, no use will be allowed in the Wood Haven Technology Park except for those uses included on the Master Plan. Of note is that only one of the Type II Industry uses (which would otherwise be allowed in a PTD district) will be permitted — that relating to the production of large, durable goods. Given the Authority's focus on encouraging the development of businesses and industries that are clean and environmentally efficient, the listing of permitted uses was carefully constructed. With the encouragement of neighbors, the allowed uses include public parks and recreational areas, since a greenway could be incorporated into the development. As an additional measure to ensure that the development of Wood Haven Technology Park meets the objectives of the Master Plan, the Authority created a Participation Committee that must approve not only the specific use sought by a potential purchaser or tenant, but also the siting of buildings and their design, exterior materials and colors, appurtenances, and equipment. The Participation Committee consists of the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem. Decisions by the Participation Committee must be unanimous. To govern the Wood Haven Technology Park, the Participation Committee and the Authority have approved the enclosed draft Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Development Guidelines (Exhibit B). The Declaration will remain a draft, subject to the final approval of the Participation Committee and the Authority, until such time as the Authority is prepared to close with a purchaser or user of the Technology Park. At that point, it will be finalized, recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office, and will bind all owners and users in Wood Haven Technology Park. This document will not replace Roanoke County's zoning 2 and development controls on Wood Haven Technology Park, but will be an addition to those controls. A metes and bounds description of the area which is the subject of this rezoning application is enclosed (Exhibit C). A listing of the adjoining property owners is enclosed (Exhibit D). Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The property is located in the Peters Creek/Hollins community planning area, is zoned 1-1 and R-1, and is split between Principal Industrial and Transition land use designations. The Community Plan recognizes the limited availability of centrally - located and prepared sites designated as Principal Industrial and the important role industrial development plays in the livelihood of Roanoke County citizens and the broader region. It recognizes that the County and its partners need an inventory of sites that can accommodate large office and industrial users in order to effectively compete in economic development. Since these facilities are important revenue generators, the Comprehensive Plan notes that areas designed Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Transition uses generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby lower intensity development. Incorporating design and development controls over a mixed-use industrial park while providing buffering for adjacent land uses is encouraged. In 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved a Community Strategic Plan which was the culmination of a community-based process intended to guide the County for several years. The Plan recognized that "One of the key components of economic growth is having infrastructure in place for development. It is imperative to have appropriately zoned, graded commercial and industrial sites available that have access to water, sewer, high speed communications, and transportation options." The Community Strategic Plan and the Comprehensive Plan both recognize the importance of regional cooperation, particularly in the realm of economic development. The Authority is an example of such cooperation and is specifically identified as such in the Strategic Plan. The Authority was recognized in February when the Wood Haven project was among nine statewide projects receiving GO Virginia infrastructure grants. And, more recently, the Wood Haven Technology Park site has been nominated by the Governor as an Opportunity Zone under the Federal Tax Cuts and .lobs Act of 2017. The 2017 Annual Report on the progress and achievements in the various initiatives set out in the Strategic Plan applauded the Authority's significant community N engagement process which provided input in the development of the Wood Haven Technology Park master plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, road, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. In coordination with the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") and the City of Roanoke's Transportation Division, a Transportation Impact Analysis dated July 14, 2017 and revised April 4, 2018 ("TIA") has been prepared and separately submitted to Roanoke County. For ease of review, the TIA (minus its lengthy appendix, previously submitted) is included as Exhibit E. By letter, both VDOT Exhibit F) and the City of Roanoke Traffic Engineering Division (Exhibit G have concurred with the scope, methodology and conclusions of that submittal. Without a specific user for the site, the analysis assumed and based its analysis on the site being developed in such a way as to result in the maximum traffic impact. When an actual user(s) has/have been determined and a required site plan developed, the traffic analysis will be updated for review by VDOT and the City of Roanoke's Transportation Division. Twelve intersections were studied in the TIA. Improvements were recommended for some intersections as detailed in the TIA. The TIA recognized that there are already substantial delays and queues on Peters Creek Road at the intersection with Valleypointe Parkway and at the I-581 Northbound off -ramp, mainly due to high intersection volumes, lack of an acceleration lane onto Peters Creek Road from the exit ramp, and the short distance from the northbound off -ramp onto Peters Creek Road to Valleypointe Parkway. These issues indicate a current need for road system improvements. The development of the Wood Haven Technology Park provides the opportunity to not only improve current conditions but also provide for future site traffic as detailed in the TIA. The Western Virginia Water Authority has confirmed that public water and sanitary sewer can be made available to serve the new development. A copy of the Western Virginia Water Authority's letter is enclosed as Exhibit H. Steps are being taken by Roanoke Gas to provide the site with service capable of providing a range of volumes and therefore accommodating a range of uses. The site is served by Appalachian Power from a circuit with a capacity of 6 MVA. Fiber telecommunications from the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority currently exist in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. While the property itself will change as the Wood Haven Technology Park is developed, the development limitations set out in the Master Plan, VDOT's ultimate requirements as to road improvements, as well as the role of the Participation Committee in reviewing and approving site development, all function 4 to buffer surrounding properties from adverse impacts. No negative impact on the public services or facilities, such as schools, parks/recreation or fire/rescue are anticipated. Indeed, the tax revenues and employment generated by the development, without any corresponding demand on public services, will only serve to enhance public services. vn`w.ex�aw+x s rn•,le„aw�sva VINFJkiIA'AlNf1D� 3NONVOH o Lm sserAe�v.e � '� AHVd RDOlONHOai NAAVH QOOM : s -a +z'F��S loruaxvunnirf. 8w,tiawiS• Sxvrxin53 Q � o o s011mossV uapV ndaiCT j 3115 IIVH3AO Nvld U319M o t z�ED HOW )16 ri Y i +•+• • , i rwii+ �'4� g �8 1Y �4 ����� �€ ova � Ps ..ar"+J"sg Iii �v� _ II•� 'i� 1�hN Q21 3NV�2flNf sa���=���W�� �� � ` g7wdW e�cuL3 a Wy�� Jatl w=�%a ori w�iw338�8 egg a ra �I I I ri A - sr I I ��. i ¢ 't itt .� k j_, a5vgo=��=¢�6d3a fY iF K 1126 ,Z r'/I rl r � - �I � 1---• ' /I/ 5` ; '� - l �1 � ��J �� x� �CD �'<��g< 62 ...Y_ ♦ _ i� ' . I : ". �g �'��� €b mak'€13o.�'.�.,��I 5 � f0\�♦ 1 .' Pjt � U a W �i.liS kid gg ♦ ; , r - Y , I €° s 8 It it �i w "R Bp -'.tis ♦ \ _ �\ Q Wen kd�i r, Y 1 I W O I I Y�l \• I. r$ f �d :15'I`y It �. "�. �. ,51. I ``1 '�-H Z y •' r ��1t +I ` 5' � ' _s ag"1 iltQN u _ dy . �S 6 t "tt ♦♦ ,\ ', yt. i W I� V7 i t. j l\ /� A Wk \\ t} rt O Sig'99 �`. \♦ .\ �m� �� '� �m 154 ♦ \t `\1 \l t\ \\ 1` -' r ] ``' 1♦♦� I,\ _ ���g ��r 8 d3 h '. . t y,i a� c , ; L t l � ♦� Od; .. e-vg Ri�� �F$ � 6�j aj \1 Y'y"Y 111 ♦ - ' Y�il •.. II \A�1•+ �/-\ , - y� iA ,1 Iti, \l as - 'rr x , \ g Ab ♦ i r 5 �� `i r. Y._;I -� ,, E,,,`` \ ` '\, t` Cam g�� < W 8 R3.� � ♦ i fyY�r \\ amt ,' C 1 \ 1 1 � I i a$MEa kris. 3��E'<� 51* �+� -_ f ly \\�, _ • til i I I' I an d X95,9 ng- —Z®A l5 � -- - '.' •vt,� I� r \ NOR l4k! Pigrq'502 I\. j f•• I I -,r�_ I° �a l FW S9U s3du 3�gSi �- •a �q '±♦_-/fir �14o��i oid �5v?sW cl- YJn F � 1-2 lr __� <HIM' RXQ DR! oil m "`a EXHIBIT n•�n•°u�aW.x ' �r...s VVNIOUTA'AlNnoo 3NONVON YM1o y— 1— Yd'P—U 7Aa=—Pi.."a R s��F�Slaumurwn.rrrf. Bir/GwiS. ffuunur8u,7 � AHVd k9OIONHO3l N3AVH QOOM SSI-u!ooss,V uopV jodai(j �a dVVI ) LH3dOHd - NV -1d U3lStlW f m 11110 A o_ aa4 ed NOg z F a jF NIX Ali i `k a •ss& , a �.i F s R R� r-� 3kQ9 3�1a \ eV fRAIJ f{ I 6&-. - - l tll'°P wq W— sn5 aiNIfluin'wvnon quavvod o � •"'�";g Y""�" '"e' )IHVd ,l'JOIONH031 N3AVH DOOM o u�usg pm+..uuu� . 8w -burst' . 8uu�aul9uy solumossd aopV .TadTaaq j SNO1110NOO UNUSixd - rand a3iSVIN $ "' _FF-2 36 V h f��tlF gU f N S 3 31= 2 A ♦ / a – 4 t a chis 4 / y 10 � M a Ito t 4 � " fY, t A 4 Y �f YA'zOzeN m}1LL�H z Yom„ alNiamn'nr ninon aNONvoa qua roA re,�a�>�mj >IHVd hJOIONH03l NEIAVH GOOM Solt'ioOSS`J i QPV . OdLIIQ SISI,IVNV 3ONV1SI0 1HJIS - NVId H31SVW V a« e t i r I \ I — 4 . �i t � 1 1i ,'.l ,tf 5 1'. i 1 Master Plan Permitted Uses Uses: The Property may be used only for the following land uses: (a) Enterprises engaged in the processing, manufacturing, compounding, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products, from processed or previously manufactured materials. Included would be assembly of electrical appliances, bottling and printing plants, and the manufacturing of paint, oils, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, solvents, and other chemical production of stone, metal or concrete. Also included are any other uses determined by the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator to be "Industry, Type I" (or a successor category) uses under the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (b) Enterprises in which large durable goods are produced including automobiles, manufactured homes, or other motor vehicles. These uses are currently classified as "Industry, Type Il" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (c) Establishments primarily engaged in the on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing within enclosed structures, involving the use of hand tools, or the use of mechanical equipment commonly associated with residential or commercial uses, or a single kiln. These uses are currently classified as "Custom Manufacturing" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (d) Use of a site for business, professional, or administrative offices, excluding medical offices. Typical uses include real estate, insurance, management, travel, or other business offices; organization and association offices; or law, architectural, engineering, accounting, or other professional offices. These uses are currently classified as "General Office" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (e) Laboratories and establishments primarily engaged in performing research or testing activities into technological matters. Typical uses include engineering and environmental laboratories, medical, optical, dental, and forensic laboratories, x- ray services, and pharmaceutical laboratories only involved in research and development. (f) Utility services, major. (g) Utility services, minor. (h) Public parks and recreational areas. (i) Accessory uses associated with a principle permitted use in accordance with any established Roanoke County standards. Master Plan Standards Height: When adjoining property is zoned residential, the maximum building height shall be forty- five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required yard adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations, the height is unlimited, subject, however, to the approval of the Development's Participation Committee Lighting: All lighting in the Development shall be shielded and directed downward to control extraneous light or glare. Where development is located adjacent to buffers, dark/night sky friendly lighting using full cutoff lighting fixtures is encouraged so that there is no direct light upward and no glare, The intensity at streets external to the Development or any adjoining residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. Lighting of parking lots, loading/unloading areas and access ways shall be no greater than 25 feet in height, and kept to minimum necessary for direction and safety during operating hours. Walkways and building entries are encouraged to have ground level lighting or pedestrian scale lighting not exceeding 15 feet in height. Signa e: For each permitted business in the Development, building mounted signs shall be allowed but shall be limited to 1 square foot of signage area for each linear foot of building facade, not to exceed 500 square feet per building face. Signage may be placed on any one or more of the building facades and need not be proportionately allocated. Notwithstanding the above limitation, each permitted business shall be entitled to minimum building mounted signage of 500 square feet. In addition, each permitted business may install one freestanding sign, which shall be monument -style with a maximum height of 15 feet and a maximum width of 10 feet. All signage shall be designed to coordinate with the building in color and materials, and shall be located on the site plan submitted to the Development's Participation Committee for approval. In addition, a monument -style identification sign for the Development located at or near the principle entrance, which sign may list all of the businesses within the Development, as well as directional signage within the Development shall be permitted. Temporary signs shall also be allowed in accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Minimum front setbacks: All structures proposed to front on existing public streets external to the Development shall be located a minimum of thirty (30) feet from the existing public right-of-way. Lot coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed seventy-five (75%) percent. Subdivision: Should the parcels which comprise the Property be combined or subdivided, the standards shall bind each subdivided or recombined parcels, as applicable. Master Plan Notes 1. Except for grading, infrastructure, and utility installation, the buffer areas shown on this Master Plan will remain undisturbed. Any disturbed areas will be revegetated. 2. The site will be graded in such a manner as to balance cut and fill to the extent practicable. 3. Principle entrance location shall be developed and landscaped in accordance with Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Section 30-63-4(A)(1). 4. The berm, as located on this Master Plan, is intended to provide additional buffering to properties along Wood Haven Road. The height of the berm will vary. The Property may be developed as a single or multiple sites. Consideration: NIA Tax Map Nos. 026.18-01-12.00-0000 026.18-01-12.01-0000 026.18-01-12.02-0000 026.18-01-13.00-0000 026.18-01-14.00-0000 026.17-01-01.00-0000 026.17-01-02.00-0000 026.17-01-03.00-0000 DRAFT Prepared by: Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority c/o Roanoke Regional Partnership 11 l Franklin Road, Suite 333 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 WOOD HAVEN TECHNOLOGY PARK DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Development Guidelines is made this day of , 20_ ("Effective Date"), by the WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY AUTHORITY, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("WVRIFA"), whose address is c/o Roanoke Regional Partnership, 11 I Franklin Road, Suite 333, Roanoke, Virginia 24011. WHEREAS, WVRIFA is the owner of the property comprising the Wood Haven Technology Park ("Wood Haven"), a commerce park consisting of approximately 100 acres and located in Roanoke County, Virginia, adjacent to Interstates 81 and 581, more fully described and depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Wood Haven Technology Park is designed to provide a location for businesses that promote economic development in the region and provide primary employment for citizens of WVRIFA's member jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the purpose of these restrictive covenants and development guidelines are to insure the orderly development of the site, to protect the environment, and to provide that the use of the site will not adversely affect the health and safety of the residents and workers in the vicinity of the site, or the use or development of property within and adjacent to the site. NOW, THEREFORE, WVRIFA hereby declares, covenants, and agrees for itself and its successors and assigns that the property identified and depicted in Exhibit A shall hereafter be held, leased, transferred, and sold subject to the following conditions and restrictions. ARTICLE I — GENERAL DECLARATIONS AND PERMITTED USES A. Definitions Business or Businesses: The owner(s), lessee(s), or occupant(s), including prospective owners, lessees or occupants of the Development. Concept Plan: The general development plan and land use plan for the Wood Haven Technology Park, including infrastructure, road and parcel design as approved by the Participation Committee and Board of WVRIFA. Declaration This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Development Guidelines as the same may be from time to time amended or supplemented. Development: Site on Wood Haven Road as more particularly described on Exhibit A, together with such other additional land as may be added to the Development by WVRIFA from time to time as permitted by this Declaration. Executive Director: Executive Director of WVRIFA. Improvements: Any and all improvements made to or constructed upon the Development including, but not limited to roads, buildings, structures, tanks and storage containers, drainage and utility facilities, driveway and parking areas, grading, landscaping, fencing, screening devices, site lighting, communication devices, signs, and all similar or related structures or improvements. Master Plan The Master Plan of the Development as approved by Roanoke County on , as the same is revised from time to time. The Declaration is an independent document and is not intended to be incorporated into the Master Plan. Participation Committee: Wood Haven Road Project Participation Committee consisting of The City of Roanoke, Virginia, the City of Salem, Virginia, and the County of Roanoke, Virginia. Property or Properties: The parcel or parcels of land, including any improvements thereon, located in the Development, as set forth in any deed, option, lease, agreement of sale applicable to these restrictions. Transfer: Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Property, any portion thereof, or any interest therein, by contract, deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assignment, lease, operation of law, or other means to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary of involuntary. In the case of a non - publicly held corporation, the assignment or other transfer of fifty percent or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constitute a Transfer, unless made to the corporation's parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation. In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assignment of partnership interests 2 shall constitute a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent of its membership interests shall constitute a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constitute a Transfer. B. Applicability These Restrictive Covenants and Development Guidelines, including the land use regulations and building requirements, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in and to the Property or any portion thereof, and shall be incorporated in any Transfer of the Property as covenants running with the Property. The Executive Director shall record applicable documents and revisions associated with these Restrictive Covenants and Development Guidelines with the Roanoke County Clerk of the Circuit Court. Invalidation of any of the provisions of these guidelines and covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, or parts thereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. WVRIFA hereby explicitly reserves an option until the twentieth (20th) anniversary of the recordation of this Declaration to expand the Development without the consent of any owner or mortgagee by including any real property acquired by WVRIFA or its successors in interest which is adjacent to the Development. The option to expand may be terminated prior to such anniversary only upon the filing by WVRIFA or its successor in interest of an amendment to this Declaration. The rights, obligations and benefits conferred upon WVRIFA under this Declaration may be assigned by WVRIFA and shall inure to the benefit of WVRIFA's successors in interest. C. Land Uses and Development Standards 1. Permitted Uses: Properties within the Development shall be used only for the following purposes. Land uses not listed are prohibited. (a) Enterprises engaged in the processing, manufacturing, compounding, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products, from processed or previously manufactured materials. Included would be assembly of electrical appliances, bottling and printing plants, and the manufacturing of paint, oils, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, solvents, and other chemical production of stone, metal or concrete. Also included are any other uses determined by the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator to be "Industry, Type I" (or a successor category) uses under the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (b) Enterprises in which large durable goods are produced including automobiles, manufactured homes, or other motor vehicles. These uses are currently classified as "Industry, Type II" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (c) Establishments primarily engaged in the on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing within enclosed structures, involving the use of hand tools, or the use of mechanical equipment commonly associated with residential or commercial uses, or a single kiln. These uses are currently classified as "Custom Manufacturing" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 3 (d) Use of a site for business, professional, or administrative offices, excluding medical offices. Typical uses include real estate, insurance, management, travel, or other business offices; organization and association offices; or law, architectural, engineering, accounting, or other professional offices. These uses are currently classified as "General Office" in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (e) Laboratories and establishments primarily engaged in performing research or testing activities into technological matters. Typical uses include engineering and environmental laboratories, medical, optical, dental, and forensic laboratories, x-ray services, and pharmaceutical laboratories only involved in research and development. (f) Utility services, major. (g) Utility services, minor. (h) Public parks and recreation areas. (i) Accessory uses associated with a principal permitted use in accordance with any established Roanoke County standards. Where it is unclear whether or not a particular use of a site within the Development is permitted, the Participation Committee, in consultation with the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator, shall decide whether or not such use is permitted, and its decision shall be final and binding upon all persons. 2. Development Standards: The use and development of all properties in the Development shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Article III of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. ARTICLE II — ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES A. Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing or proposed improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said improvements to the Participation Committee. Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans, provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. Review and recommendation of approval with respect to uses and improvements by the Participation Committee shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of any permits or approvals required for any local, state, or federal law or regulation. Plans will be subject to all applicable federal and state laws and Roanoke County ordinances. Pertinent ordinances of the Roanoke County include, but may not be limited to: Zoning, Subdivision, Storm Water Management, Erosion/Sediment Control and Steep Slope Ordinance, as amended. Plans submitted to Roanoke County for review and approval shall be accompanied by the written statement of the Participation Committee that it has reviewed and approved said plans pursuant to the Declaration. Should plans be revised, the revised plans shall be subject to the further review and approval of the Participation Committee. Insurance, including liability, hazard and extended "all risks" coverage, and builder's risk shall be 4 in place and shall be continuously maintained in full force and effect in such amounts and with such insurers as the Participation Committee shall reasonably require, with WVRIFA named as an additional insured. B. Subdivision, In General All property within the Development shall be subdivided in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. No lot may be subdivided or its boundary lines changed except with the prior written consent of WVRIFA. WVRIFA expressly reserves to itself the right to re -plat any lot or lots owned by it and shown on any subdivision plat of the Property in order to create a modified building lot or lots and to take such other steps as are reasonably necessary to make such re -platted lot suitable and fit as a building site, including but not limited to, the relocation of easements, roads, and rights of way to conform to the new boundaries of said re -platted lot. C. Project Review Process The proposed use and development of a Property in the Development must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Participation Committee prior to the transfer of land, subsequent transfer, development, or redevelopment of a Property pursuant to the participation agreement between the localities represented on the Participation Committee. D. Maintenance of Improvements All properties, buildings, structures and improvements shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and attractive condition at all times. The premises shall be kept in a state of good repair. Maintenance and landscaping and lawns shall include all necessary planting, cutting, watering, fertilizing, aerating, seeding, spraying, pruning, and weeding. Property owners shall promptly replace any dead or damaged landscaping approved as part of the site plan for the Property. Painted and exposed metal surfaces shall be maintained and kept free from peeling or rust. Parking areas and drives shall be paved and damaged pavement or hard surfaces repaired. E. Enforcement Enforcement of these Development Guidelines and Restrictive Covenants shall be undertaken by WVRIFA. In the event of a violation, the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia shall have the ultimate jurisdiction to enforce or interpret any of the restrictions, conditions, covenants, and liens now or hereafter imposed by this Declaration. Failure to enforce any provision contained in this Declaration shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the provisions, whether the violation is singular or repetitive. ARTICLE III — DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS 5 The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, standards set out in the Master Plan, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Development. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply A. Primary Access Primary access to sites within the Development will be provided via an access road off Wood Haven Road. Driveways and potential internal site circulation roads including those that may be required to provide access to development on adjacent tracts may be provided off this primary access road or any secondary access road that may be developed in the future. B. Buildings 1. Siting and Location: Buildings shall be located on the site such that the Development establishes an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and parking and enhances the natural and man-made features of the Development. The siting of buildings and all other improvements on a parcel shall be subject to the approval of the Participation Committee. 2. Design: All development shall meet the following design standards for exterior facades, materials, appurtenances, and equipment. (a) General Building Design: The architectural composition, scale, elements and details of a building shall relate to the character of the Development. Landscaping shall be an integral component of the exterior design of any building. All buildings shall minimize potential impacts from noise, light, and traffic. (b) Building Facades and Materials: Buildings shall enjoy various architectural forms to create visual character and interest. Buildings shall be segmented with distinct masses of vertical and horizontal elements to minimize bulkiness. Front building facades and those facing public streets shall be designed to exhibit attractive architectural features, materials, dimensions and symmetry. Brick, stone, architectural masonry, architectural metal panels, and glass are preferred exterior materials for sides of the building seen when entering the parcel. Two or more colors are encouraged to highlight architectural details and materials. The Participation Committee shall have the right to approve the exterior materials, including exterior colors, of any structure or improvement in the Development. G Primary building entries shall be clearly visible and articulated using architectural features, elements and materials. Roofs shall be designed to be an integral component of the architecture of the building and shall be non -reflective. Planned expansion or renovation for all buildings or structures must meet or exceed the quality of the initial structure. (c) Building Appurtenances and Equipment: Roof mounted equipment and vents shall be reasonably screened from public street views by painted panels, opaque screens, or other effective methods. All exterior equipment shall be designed to minimize noise and shall include appropriate insulation materials or technologies to control outside noise. Exposed features such as gutters, downspouts, vents, towers, etc. shall be designed to match the color of surfaces to which they are attached, (d) Dammed or Destroyed Buildings: If any building or other improvement in the Development is damaged or destroyed by fire, storm, explosives, or otherwise, then all debris resulting from the damage or destruction shall be cleaned and removed within sixty (60) days of the damage or destruction. If any building is to be reconstructed, such construction shall begin within six (6) months of the date of the damage or destruction, or the land shall be graded and restored to substantially the condition, which existed prior to initial construction. C. Parking, Loading Areas and Docks Parking for employees shall be located in areas that are removed from the entrance. Parking for visitors shall be located in close proximity to the main building entrance and shall be setback from the entrance so as to not interfere with or detract from the views of the building seen when entering the parcel. All parking areas shall be landscaped both internally and externally to enhance the architecture of the building, the site, and the Development. Loading areas and docks shall be appropriately screened. D. Utilities All utilities shall be located underground unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. All development shall be served by public water and sewer systems. Low -impact design (L.I.D.) methods of managing storm water shall be considered in designing the development. All storm water management areas shall be landscaped appropriately and maintained. Management areas and drainage channels shall blend with the landscaping of the site and incorporate natural materials and vegetation. E. Accessory Structures 7 Walls and Fences: Walls and fences shall complement the architecture of the building and shall be of materials that architecturally enhance the building and the Development. Where fencing is needed, decorative metal fencing is preferred; chain-link fencing may be allowed if approved by the Participation Committee. Where retaining walls are required in the front yard or where they are visible from public areas, wall materials shall be stone or finished masonry. Retaining walls higher than 8 feet are discouraged. Long expanses of wall surfaces shall be offset and be appropriately landscaped. As an alternative to traditional retaining walls, "green walls" consisting of architectural concrete block, covered with a rapidly -grown groundcover, may be permitted in less visible areas. Terraced wall systems are encouraged supplemented with plantings on the flat terraces. 2. Outbuildings: All accessory buildings shall be consistent with the architecture of the primary building. Accessory buildings shall be located behind the front building line of the primary building and shall be reasonably screened from public streets unless approved by the Participation Committee. 3. Trash Enclosures: Areas for hash collection shall be accessible for service. All trash areas shall be fully enclosed, located behind the front building line of the primary building, and reasonably screened from public streets unless approved by the Participation Committee. Enclosures must be architecturally consistent and compatible with the design of the primary building. F. Outside Stora e No materials may be stored on the Property except inside a building or behind a visual barrier which reasonably screens the stored materials from view from any lot line or public right-of-way. G. Signs All signage shall be designed to be integrated and coordinated with the building to complement the building design in scale, color, and materials. H. Temporary Construction Structures and Utilities Construction activities shall be in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local land disturbance regulations. Temporary construction structures, portable offices, and other related facilities shall be maintained in good condition and arranged in a compact and organized manner on site. Facilities shall be situated so they are unobtrusive and attractive when seen from the public right-of-way or lot lines. All temporary structures and portable facilities shall be removed upon the completion of construction activity and before permanent occupancy of the building. All temporary construction utilities shall be in a single, unobtrusive alignment. Distribution to the various areas of construction shall be from an approved, on-site location. Areas for the storage of construction equipment and materials shall be coordinated and visually unobtrusive from the public right-of-way and lot lines. Mobile equipment shall be aligned in an orderly manner at the end of each work day. Construction debris shall not be allowed to 8 accumulate during construction. It shall be removed daily or located in a visually screened place if debris is to be removed less frequently. Open burning of debris is not permitted. After construction is complete, any temporary barriers, surplus materials, and all trash and debris shall be removed from the site. All backfill materials shall be cleared of any building materials, stone or debris, ARTICLE IV — REPURCHASE AND PURCHASE OPTIONS A. Option to Repurchase in the Event of No Construction If, after the expiration of three (3) years after the recordation of a deed in the Development from WVRIFA to the purchaser, the then record property owner of the purchased Property shall not have begun in good faith the actual construction of a building acceptable to WVRIFA upon the Property, then, in that event, WVRIFA shall have the right and option to refund to said record property owner the amount of the original purchase price paid to WVRIFA for said Property or Ten and no/00 Dollars ($10.00), whichever amount is greater, whereupon the said record property owner shall forthwith convey the Property back to WVRIFA. In the event that the record property owner for any reason fails or refuses to convey title back to WVRIFA as required herein, then, in that event, WVRIFA shall have the right to enter into and take possession of said Property, along with all rights and causes of action necessary to have title to said Property conveyed back to WVRIFA. B. Option to Purchase In the event that any owner of unimproved Property in the Development or any portion thereof shall desire to sell all or a portion thereof in accordance with the terms of the Declaration, WVRIFA shall have the first right and option to purchase said Property at the same purchase price paid to WVRIFA by the original purchaser or Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.00), whichever amount is greater. Prior to such sale, the property owner shall notify WVRIFA by registered or certified mail of its intentions to sell the Property or any portion thereof. Said notice shall describe the exact parcel intended to be sold. WVRIFA shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of said notice in which to exercise the option. Settlement shall take place within sixty (60) days after such exercise. C. Warranties In the event that WVRIFA exercises any of its rights specified in subparagraphs A and B above to reacquire the Property, the then record property owner shall convey the Property to WVRIFA by general warranty deed with English covenants of title, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. ARTICLE V — ENFORCEMENT AND AMENDMENT 9 A. Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement WVRIFA and its authorized agents may from time to time at any reasonable hour or hours enter and inspect any parcel and the improvements located thereon to verify compliance with these covenants. A violation or breach of any provisions herein shall give WVRIFA or its authorized agents the right, after ten (10) days written notice of such violations, to enter the Property and to abate or remove, at the expense of the owner or tenant, anything or any condition which is contrary to these provisions or in violation of law. These covenants shall also be enforceable by WVRIFA, or its successor in interest, in a proceeding at law or in equity (including injunctive relief) at the expense of the violator (including attorney's fees and costs) in the applicable court. Failure by WVRIFA, or its successor in interest, to enforce any covenant or restriction contained herein shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. B. Amendment The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the Property for a term of twenty-five (25) years from the Effective Date, after which time the Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless amended by or abolished by a written agreement signed by all owners of the Property subject to the Declaration and approved by a resolution adopted by WVRIFA. WVRIFA shall have the authority to unilaterally amend the Declaration at any time and from time to time so long as it either (i) owns any property within the Development; or (ii) its option rights to expand the Development have not terminated. Once WVRIFA no longer owns any Property within the Development and its option rights to expand the Development have terminated, this Declaration may be amended in whole or in part by a recorded agreement bearing the signatures of all the Property owners accompanied by a resolution adopted by WVRIFA approving the amendment. C. Severability Invalidation of any of these covenants or any part thereof by judgments or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. WITNESS the following signature as of the date first above written: WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY AUTHORITY 0 Its: 10 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY 1 COUNTY OF to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by of Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Commission Expires: Registration Number: Notary Public 11 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF PROPERTY SITUATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERN SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 81 AND INTERSTATE ROUTE 581 AND ADJOINING WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) AND THIRLANE ROAD (ROUTE 626). BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN SET ON THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY OF WOOD HAVEN RD. (ROUTE 628) AND AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF TM 037.05-01-29,00-0000, THENCE WITH SAID TAX PARCEL NORTH 29"31'49" WEST, 998.69 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET AT OLD FENCE BREAK; THENCE NORTH 64"43'04" WEST, 387.23 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON LINE OF TM 26.17-01-04.00-0000; THENCE WITH SAID TAX PARCEL AND WITH TM 026.17-01-05.00-0000 NORTH 9°04'48" EAST, 435.02 FEET TO A 12 " ASH FOUND; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE LATTER TAX PARCEL SOUTH 87"29'32" WEST, 461.14 FEET TO A TACK IN POST FOUND ON THE LINE OF TM 26.17-02-10.00-0000; THENCE CONTINUING WITH SAID TAX PARCEL NORTH 9019'23" EAST, 64.75 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE. SOUTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 81; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE: SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 81 NORTH 67°59'30" EAST, 1,340.96 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE NORTH 78048'28" EAST, 494.04 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE NORTH 64056'21" EAST, 862.86 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING AN ANGLE OF 13054'54", A RADIUS OF 1,052.92 FEET, A TANGENT OF 128.49 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 255.71 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 83905'56" EAST 255.08 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 76°24'48" EAST, 411.16 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE NORTH 84022'21" EAST, 63.14 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 8°16'02" EAST, 3551 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 72030'23" EAST, 303.46 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 52'17'02" EAST, 109.05 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING AN ANGLE OF 19°22'40", A RADIUS OF 1,180.24 FEET, A TANGENT OF 201.51 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 399.17 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 38055'51" EAST 397.27 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 29°14'15" EAST, 268.38 FEET TO A MONUMNT FOUND; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING AN ANGLE OF 0026'20", A RADIUS OF 2,771.19 FEET, A TANGENT OF 10.62 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.23 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 28957'40" EAST 21.23 FEET TO A REBAR FOUND ON THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF TM 26.18- 01-3.1,00; THENCE WITH SAID TAX PARCEL AND LEAVING THE RIGHT OF WAY OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 81 NORTH 89039'00" WEST, 153.24 FEET TO AN AXLE FOUND IN THE MIDDLE OF A 30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AS DEFINED ON PLATS IN INSTRUMENT N0, 20106313 AND DEED BOOK 520 PAGE 1; THENCE WITH THE SAID TAX PARCEL AND ALONG THE CENTER OF THIRLANE ROAD SOUTH 7°28'01" EAST, 327.46 FEET TO A EXHIBIT C POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THIRLANE ROAD (ROUTE 626); THENCE LEAVING SAID TAX PARCEL AND WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THIRLANE ROAD (ROUTE 626) AND WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) SOUTH 82°16'35" WEST, 20.31 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 33°25'01" WEST, 65.24 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 70°19'46" WEST, 150,03 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 76°25'16" WEST, 110.40 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH 71'38'15" EAST 11.87 FEET FROM AN IRON SET; THENCE SOUTH 76°38'12" WEST, 20.34 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 56°00'28" WEST, 112.37 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 2°10'09" EAST, 54.05 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 62012'55" WEST, 94.67 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 71°21'49" WEST, 181.39 FEET TO A MONUMENT FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 66°17'08" WEST, 67.37 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 75029'46" WEST, 6.64 FEET TO A PK NAIL SET AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF TM 26.18-01-14.01- 0000; THENCE WITH SAID TAX PARCEL AND LEAVING THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) NORTH 30°45'03" WEST, 537.35 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 59°14'57" WEST, 360.15 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 3042'31" EAST, 423.98 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628); THENCE LEAVING SAID TAX PARCEL AND WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) SOUTH 78°39'36" WEST, 623.46 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING AN ANGLE OF 28058'19", A RADIUS OF 383.10 FEET, A TANGENT OF 98.98 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 193.72 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 6403.1'21" WEST 191.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 49°42'13" WEST, 503,12 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND ON THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF TM 37.05-01-30.00-0000; THENCE WITH SAID TAX PARCEL AND LEAVING THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) NORTH 34°48'32" WEST, 431.70 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 55"10'03" WEST, 200.02 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE SOUTH 34'49'09" EAST, 450.93 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUND ON THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD; THENCE LEAVING SAID TAX PARCEL AND WITH THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD (ROUTE 628) SOUTH 49°4315" WEST, 307.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 109.968 ACRES ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Roanoke County Tax Parcels. 026.18-01-13.00-0000 026.18-01-14.00-0000 026.17-01-01.00-0000 026.17-01-02.00-0000 026.17-01-03.00-0000 026.18-01-12.00-0000 026.18-01-12.02-0000 026.18-01-12.01-0000 EXHIBIT D TAX MAP NO..::OWNER(S) 1 ADDRESS ZONING 1 026.18-01-11.00-0000 Channie Ross Carter Life Estate 7207 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 11 2 026.18-01-09.00-0000 Lauren E. Petty 7121 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 11 3 026,18-01-10.00-0000 Robert A. Chapman 4676 Red Barn Lane, N.E. Roanoke, VA 24012 11 4 026.18-01-08.00-0000 William Smith, Executor Mary Ellen Smith Estate 11614 th Street Roanoke, VA 24016 11 5 026.18-01-07,00-0000 Harriett S. Sweetenberg Heirs c/o Charles Sweetenberg 6916 Connie Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 11 6 026.18-01-06.00-0000 RVP Development LLC c/o Poe & Cronk Real Estate Group, Inc. 10 S. Jefferson Street, Ste. 1200 Roanoke, VA 24011 11 7 026.1801-15.00-0000 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 12C 8 026.15-01-01.00-0000 English Holding Company Inc. P. O. Box P-7000 LAinnhhijrri, VA 24505 12C EXHIBIT D 9 026.03-01-03.00-0000 Gregory Olen Givens, III AR Margie Gail Givens Plano, et al. c/o Charles E. Givens 4707 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.E. Roanoke, VA 24019 10 026.03-01-07.01-0000 John L. Mitchell AR Carol Click 2689 Gil Have Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 11 026.03-01-07.02-0000 John L. Mitchell AR Carol Click Mitchell 2689 Gil Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 12 026.03-01-07.03-0000 Richard E. Shawn AR Nancy G. Shawn 2685 Gil Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 13 026.03-01-07.05-0000 Gil -Haven Drive Association LLC AR 2680 Gil Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 14 026.03-01-07.07-0000 Terry M. Keffer AR Karen W. Keffer 2680 Gil Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 15 026.03-01-08.00-0000 Harry H. Fortune, Jr. AR Nancy C. Fortune 2608 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 16 026.03-01-09.00-0000 Clarence P. Lockhart Revocable Trust AR 2578 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 17 026.03-01-10.00-0000 Lloyd A. Bowman AR Joyce J. Bowman 2570 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 18 026.03-01-11.00-0000 Lloyd A. Bowman AR Joyce J. Bowman 2570 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 19 026.03-01-12.00-0000 William H. Mistele AR Jing Zhang 2508 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 20 026.03-01-12.01-0000 William H. Mistele AR Jing Zhang 2508 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 21 026.17-01-03.01-0000 Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility AR Authority P. O. Box 2569 Roanoke, VA 24010 22 026.03-01-17.01-0000 Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility AR Authority P. O. Box 2569 Roanoke, VA 24010 23 026.03-01-17.00-0000 Clarence E. Wise AR Vickie W. Wise 2504 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 24 026.03-01-18.00-0000 Mark Steven Reinhardt AR 5431 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 25 026.03-01-16.00-0000 Anthony Bradford Walrond AR 2416 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 26 026.03-01-15.00-0000 John Phillip Walrond AR 812 Fenwick Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24012 27 026.03-01-14.00-0000 Anthony Bradford Walrond AR 2416 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 28 026.03-01-13.00-0000 Paul Dale Walrond AR 4533 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.E. Roanoke, VA 24019 29 026.17-01-08.00-0000 Robert C. Brammer AR Barbara T. Brammer 2386 Loch Haven Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 30 026.17-02-10.00-0000 Kimberly D. Sanchez -Cruz R1 8574 Brubaker Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 31 026.17-01-05.00-0000 Clarence L. Tarpley R1 Betty A. Tarpley 8576 Brubaker Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 32 026.17-0104.00-0000 Clarence L. Tarpley R1 Betty Tarpley 8329 Ram Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 33 037.05-01-29.00-0000 Darrell E. Bower R1 Lena D. Bower 7875 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 34 037.05-01-04.01-0000 Michael J. Dalbo R1 7920 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 35 037.05-01-04.02-0000 David L. Lucas R1 Jeneva L. Lucas 7910 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 36 037.05-01-04,03-0000 Rickey L. Hodge R1 Kathryn L. Hodge 7900 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 37 037.05-01-30.00-0000 D. E. Bower R1 Lena A. Bower 7875 Wood Haven Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 38 037.05-0832.00-0000 Whitney Estates Homeowners Assoc. Inc. R1 c/o Thomas McCracken 7926 Sequoia Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 39 037,05-08-04.00-0000 Patrick K. Dooley R1 7874 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 40 037.05-08-03.00-0000 Gregory Alan Addison R1 7870 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 41 037.05-08-02.00-0000 Adrian L. Whicker R1 Jennifer R. Whicker 7866 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 42 037.05-08-01.00-0000 Greg W. St. Clair R1 Tammy Lee St. Clair 7862 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 43 037.06-01-74.00-0000 Lewis Living Trust R1 Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Trustee 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 44 037.06-01-73.00-0000 Lewis Living Trust R1 Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Trustee 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 45 037.06-01-72.00-0000 Lewis Living Trust R1 Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Trustee 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 46 037.06-01-71.00-0000 Ernest E. Sweetenberg R1 6834 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 47 037.06-01-70.00-0000 Leland Newman R1 c/o Elmer Newman 7044 Thirlane Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 48 037,06-01-70.01-0000 Ernest E. Sweetenberg R1 Norma Jean Sweetenberg 6834 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 49 037.06-01-69.00-0000 Richard Newman Heirs R1 c/o Joyce Newman Payne, Exec. 7044 Thirlane Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 50 037.06-01-68.00-0000 Lewis Living Trust R1 Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Trustee 7838 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 51 026.18-01-14.01-0000 Old German Baptist Church 11 c/o Walter J. Jamison 50 Jamison Farm Lane Troutville, VA 24175 52 037.06-01-67.00-0000 Michael D. Hamilton R1 7706 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 53 037.06-01-66.00.0000 Ernest E. Sweetenberg R1 Norma Jean Sweetenberg 6834 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 54 037.06-01-65.00-0000 Judith T. Young R1 7636 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 55 037.06-01-64.00-0000 Timothy E. Sweetenberg R1 Angelia Doggett-Sweetenberg 7630 Wood Haven Road Roanoke, VA 24019 56 037.06-01-63.00-0000 Ernest E. Sweetenberg R1 Norma Jean Sweetenberg 6834 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 57 037.06-01-62.00-0000 Ernest E. Sweetenberg R1 Norma Jean Sweetenberg 6834 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 58 037.06-01-09.01-0000 Calvin Coleman R1 7055 Thirlane Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 59 037.06-01-09.00-0000 Calvin Coleman R1 Deborah D. Coleman 7055 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 60 037.06-01-08-00-0000 Calvin Coleman R1 Deborah D. Coleman 7055 Thirlane Road Roanoke, VA 24019 61 037.06-01-04.00-0000 Sweetenberg Land Trust R1 Charles H. Sweetenberg, Trustee 6916 Connie Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning Districts: 11 Industrial (Light) District 12C Industrial (Heavy) District w/Conditions AR Agricultural/Residential R1 Low Density Residential 62 037.06-01-03.00-0000 Vixay Sonethongchanh R1 7652 Sweetenberg Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 63 037.06-01-05.00-0000 Harriett S. Sweetenberg Heirs R1 c/o Charles Sweetenberg 6916 Connie Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning Districts: 11 Industrial (Light) District 12C Industrial (Heavy) District w/Conditions AR Agricultural/Residential R1 Low Density Residential ODAVENPORT 2ooz 15V ANNIVERSARY 20ij TRANSPORTATION IMPAC I Project Number: 163045 Original: July 14, 2017 ANALYSIS Revision: April 4, 2018 a Prepared for WVRIFA Wood Haven Site Roanoke County, V A This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including hint DAVENPORT Transportation Impact Analysis Wood Haven Site Roanoke County, VA Prepared for WVRIFA Original: July 14, 2017 Revised: April 4, 2018 Analysis by: Nick Liguori, P.E. Danver Dela Cruz, E.I. L Drafting/Graphics by: Danver Dela Cruz E.I. O v NICII%AS'R LIGUORI Lie. No. 053368 Sealed by: Nick Liguori, P.E. 0 �y1� S ZONAL 0 �� ti This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post -consumer content. All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is 100% recyclable. This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Richmond Office: 16003 Ciw(inm iml 110l'k:U l SCn11l;! flu: Souuhc.ini iittcC 2li02 South �:1WMCi'tickl. V \b.tln: 80I �.i 1091 1 1-;m 116,1iS t)3_l 0DAVEMORT Wood Haven Site — Transportation Impact Analysis Roanoke, VA Prepared for WVRIFA April 4, 2018 Executive Summary The Wood Haven Site is a proposed development to be located on the southwest quadrant of 1-81 and 1-581 on the north side of SR Route 628 (Wood Haven Road) in Roanoke County, Virginia. One access point is proposed on Wood Haven Road approximately 900 feet west of Thirlane Road. While the specific users for this site are not known at this time, the types of uses will be restricted to limited industry, laboratories, research and development facilities, custom manufacturing and general office. For analysis purposes, this study assumed the development of 550,000 square feet of a combination of limited industrial, office space and research and development - which represents the maximum impact scenario for traffic generation. For example, while the potential exists for a manufacturing or industrial facility of up to 900,000 square feet, such a use would generate fewer trips than the 550,000 square feet of mixed uses upon which we have based our analysis. Based on ITE rates and equations, this development has a trip generation potential of 5,011 daily trips, with 732 trips in the AM peak and 689 trips in the PM peak. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The recommended improvements are summarized in Exhibit A and in Table A. Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway and 1-581 NB Off ramp There are already substantial delays and queues on Peters Creek Road at the intersection with Valleypointe Parkway. Both the Synchrol SimTraffic and the VISSIM analysis confirm this conclusion. The existing adverse conditions are mainly due to the high intersection volumes, which indicate a current need for road system improvements to handle existing traffic volumes and address existing safety issues. The proposed site development provides the opportunity to not only improve current conditions, but to provide for future site traffic. The intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway is located only 650 feet east of the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp onto Peters Creek Road eastbound. The traffic models and field observations indicated that there are safety issues, as well as congestion, at the merge area from 1-581 Northbound. This is due to the lack of an acceleration lane onto Peters Creek Road from the exit ramp, as well as the short distance to Valleypointe Parkway. Taking the additional site traffic into account, it is recommended that the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp at its intersection with eastbound Peters Creek Road be signalized. The westbound direction of Peters Creek Road does not need to be signalized since it is median -separated. This improvement would 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — TIA Executive Summary DAVENPORT resolve the existing safety and weaving issues on Peters Creek Road by providing a protected, signalized phase during which traffic from 1-581 Northbound off -ramp can turn right and proceed towards the appropriate lane at the Valleypointe Parkway intersection. In order to signalize the off -ramp, its approach onto Peters Creek Road should be realigned to a location approximately 1,100 feet (center to center) from Valleypointe Parkway, with dual right turn lanes on the approach. These recommendations are shown in the conceptual plan in Exhibit B. The VISSIM and SimTraffic simulations indicate adequate queue storage along Peters Creek Road. At the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway, it is recommended that a second eastbound left turn lane on Peters Creek Road be provided, and that the lanes on southbound Valleypointe Parkway be reconfigured as two (2) right turn lanes and a combined left/through lane. These improvements will require geometric modifications to accommodate dual turning lanes, including the presence of truck traffic. A conceptual plan illustrating these improvements is shown in Exhibit B. Right turn overlap signals should also be provided on all approaches. Since this signal is part of a coordinated system on Peters Creek Road, modifications to timing will need to be coordinated within that system for optimal throughput. Wood Haven Road The site access on Wood Haven Road is proposed to be located approximately 900 feet west of Thirlane Road. Based on the VDOT Road Design manual, this access will warrant both a right turn and a left turn entry lane on Wood Haven Road. Separate left and right turn exit lanes from the site are also recommended to reduce delays exiting the site. Cove Road at Green Ridge Road The unsignalized intersection of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road is expected to operate at LOS E during the future build PM peak. To reduce delays on the stop - controlled southbound Green Ridge Road, a southbound left turn lane is recommended. Also, eastbound Cove Road warrants a left turn lane due to the volume of left turns, even in existing conditions without the addition of site traffic. A left turn lane is recommended in order to safely accommodate left turns at this intersection. These improvements, which are shown in the conceptual plan in Exhibit C, are expected to improve the level of service to LOS D during the PM peak, in addition to improving overall intersection safety. Conclusion In conclusion, this study has determined the potential traffic impacts of this development based on a maximum impact scenario for traffic generation. It has identified transportation improvements that will not only improve existing safety and capacity issues but also accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. With the recommended improvements in place, the traffic impacts of the proposed development can be accommodated while improving existing safety and congestion issues. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — TIA Executive Summary ii DAVENPORT Table 1Recommendations [ntersection Recommended Improvements Electric Road at Cove Road No improvements recommended • Provide eastbound left turn lane on Wood Haven Road with 100 Wood Haven Road at Sitefeet of storage and appropriate taper Access ' Provide westbound right turn lane on Wood Haven Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper • Provide separate left and right turn lanes exiting from the site Wood Haven Road at 0 Provide eastbound right turn lane on Wood Haven Road with 150 Valleypointe Parkway feet of storage and appropriate taper Green Ridge Road at Electric Road Optimize signal timing to accommodate future traffic Cove Road Provide eastbound left turn lane on Cove Road with 100 feet of at Green Ridge Road storage and appropriate taper (see Exhibit C) • Provide southbound left turn lane on Green Ridge Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate to er Cove Road . Optimize signal timing and coordinate with Peters Creek Road at Peters Creek Road system timing Peters Creek Road No improvements recommended at Thirlane Road • Provide second eastbound left turn lane on Peters Creek Road with Peters Creek Road 400 feet of storage and appropriate taper at Valleypointe Parkway ' Reconfigure southbound approach to provide two (2) right turn (see Exhibit B) lanes and a combined left 1 through lane • Provide right turn overlap phases on all approaches + Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals e Signalize off -ramp and eastbound Peters Creek Road. Westbound Peters Creek Road at 1-581 Peters Creek Road does not need to be signalized since it is Northbound Off -ramp to median -separated. Eastbound Peters Creek Realign 1-581 NB off -ramp to approach Peters Creek Road Road approximately 1,100 feet (center to center) west of Valleypointe (see Exhibit B) Parkway and provide two (2) right turn lanes on 1-581 NB off -ramp, with a minimum of 400 feet of storage on second right turn lane. • Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals Peters Creek Road at Wood , Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals Haven Road Peters Creek Road at North No improvements recommended Lake Drive Peters Creek Road at No improvements recommended Northside High School Road 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — TIA Executive Summary 2 Asn vYaBJ'. Mlf� — ��rr... d14tlLFdd08N F d uwv,3xr Win, IVA 3NONYOM l69'I ONY N011435a31N1 4 m 1�a+ jf\i/. iiY4I!{Ml 33AYH 040M+iN10dA3i7YM133d4_1,.2-l. OdN�/1b�Cl \_ .t.w.� MV" =' DAVEMQRT Wood Haven Site -- Transportation Impact Analysis Roanoke, VA Prepared for WVRIFA April 4, 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 2 Figure1 -- Site Plan..................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2A — Site Location Map.................................................................................... 5 Figure2B — Vicinity Map.............................................................................................. 6 2.0 Existing Conditions.............................................................................................................7 2.1 Inventory .................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes................................................................ . 7 Figure 3 -- Existing Lane Geometry........................................................................... 8 Figure 4 — 2017 Existing Traffic Volumes.................................................................... 9 3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements..............................................10 3.1 Approved Developments......................................................................................10 3.2 Committed Improvements............................................................ ...10 4.0 Methodology......................................................................................................................10 4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards.......................................................................10 5.0 Capacity Analysis..............................................................................................................11 5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria.....................................................................11 6.0 2024 Build -out Analysis....................................................................................................12 6.1 Trip Generation....................................................................................................12 6.2 Trip Distribution....................................................................................................13 6.3 Future No Build Traffic.........................................................................................13 6.4 Total Traffic..........................................................................................................13 Figure 5 — Trip Distribution.............................................................. ............. Figure 6 --- 2024 Future No Build Volumes.................................................................15 Figure7 — Site Trips.................................................................................. Figure 8 — 2024 Future Build Volumes......................................................................17 6.5 Level of Service Results......................................................................................18 6.6 Queuing Analysis................................................................................................. 28 Figure 9 -- Recommended Improvements.................................................................. 35 7.0 2030 Design Year Analysis............................................................................................... 36 7.1 2030 Traffic Volumes........................................................................................... 36 Figure 10 — 2030 No Build Volumes.......................................................................... 37 Figure 11 — 2030 Design Year Volumes.................................................................... 38 7.2 Level of Service Results...................................................................................... 39 7.3 Queuing Analysis................................................................................................. 46 8.0 VISSIM Interchange Analysis ............................................................................................52 9.0 Summary and Conclusion................................................................................................54 Appendix...,.,.,._............................................ _......................................................................... 57 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 1 f DAVENPORT Wood Haven Site — Transportation Impact Analysis Roanoke, VA Prepared for WVRIFA April 4, 2018 1 .0 Introduction The Wood Haven Site is a proposed development to be located on the southwest quadrant of 1-81 and 1-581 on the north side of SR Route 628 (Wood Haven Road) in Roanoke County, Virginia. This site consists of approximately 109 acres, and proposes to have one access point on Wood Haven Road approximately 900 feet west of SR Route 626 (Thirlane Road). While the specific users for this site are not known at this time, the types of uses will be restricted to limited industry, laboratories, research and development facilities, custom manufacturing and general office. For analysis purposes, this study assumed development of 550,000 square feet of a combination of limited industrial, office space, and research and development. The site plan is shown in Figure 1. Figures 2A and 2B present the site location map and vicinity map, respectively. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The following intersections were included in the study: • Electric Road at Cove Road • Wood Haven Road at Thirlane Road • Wood Haven Road at Proposed Site Access • Wood Haven Road at Valleypointe Parkway • Green Ridge Road at Electric Road • Cove Road at Green Ridge Road • Cove Road at Peters Creek Road • Peters Creek Road at Thirlane Road • Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway • Peters Creek Road at Wood Haven Road • Peters Creek Road at North Lake Drive • Peters Creek Road at Northside High School Road The above-mentioned intersections were analyzed for the following scenarios: • 2017 Existing Conditions • 2024 Future No Build Conditions • 2024 Future Build Conditions • 2030 Design Year No Build Conditions • 2030 Design Year Build Conditions 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA DAVENPORT Additionally, the 1-581 1 Peters Creek Road interchange was reviewed using VISSIM software. The analysis periods for this study were weekday AM (6-9 am) and PM (4-7 pm) peaks. City of Roanoke and VDOT were contacted to obtain background information and to ascertain the elements to be covered in the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA). Information regarding the property was provided by the site civil engineer, Draper Aden Associates. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 3 i ;JI R6 :.— W. � , 1 s 4 w 0 .k.,�i Gi4.' 4 4 ry R6 :.— W. � , A3i1i??40htt'.�I s !Rj1�..'J�Y w 0 .k.,�i Gi4.' 4 U uv] Q ry Up u U f t _ 1 r r A3i1i??40htt'.�I DAVENPORT 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Inventory A field investigation was conducted by DAVENPORT staff to determine the existing roadway conditions in the study area. Table 2.1 presents a summary of this review. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane geometry. 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff. Table 2.2 below contains the dates these counts were conducted. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. The full reports for these volumes can be found in the appendix. Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data Table 2.1 - Street Inventory Date Taken:w. Facility Name Route # Typical Cross Section Pavement Speed Maintained Wood Have Road at Valleypointe Parkway 2/1/2017 DAVENPORT Width Limit B Wood Haven Route 628 2 -lane undivided Approx. 20' 35 MPH VDOT Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Electric Road Route 419 4-1ane divided Approx. 66' 35 MPH VDOT Cove Road Route 780 2-1ane undivided Approx. 25' 30 MPH VDOT Thirlane Road Route 626 2 -lane undivided Approx. 23' 25 MPH VDOT Valleypointe Route 4 -lane undivided Approx. 52' 40 MPH VDOT Parkway 1947 Green Ridge Route 629 2 -lane undivided Approx. 23' 35 MPH VDOT Road Peters Creek Route 117 4 -lane divided Approx. 68' 45 MPH City of Road Roanoke 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff. Table 2.2 below contains the dates these counts were conducted. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. The full reports for these volumes can be found in the appendix. Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data Count Location: Date Taken:w. Electric Road at Cove Road 2/1/2017 DAVENPORT Wood Haven Road at Thirlane Road 2/1/2017 DAVENPORT Wood Have Road at Valleypointe Parkway 2/1/2017 DAVENPORT Electric Road at Green Ridge Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Green Ridge Road at Cove Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Peters Creek Road at Cove Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Peters Creek Road at Thirlane Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT Peters Creek Road at Wood Haven Road 1/31/2017 DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 7 F `� . 2 C. �.mv 1.513 ;� »<7 C N � Jll. 4-+1121 x21175W z > w Wood Haven Road 14311571 'I z Bf4— 101133 - w i _ O U n $g A _v' NgM4 L20)28 g$88=R 3e flim L35l83 "tea 4-28116 Eyy x8!50 Jl4yb=� x611138 _ag® Velleypolnte Parkway 21174✓ hjP 9Fese soy _� 22127--w 1691301 ]9e•r� t-681 o57T,n E s:°`e8aa L71l15 am J!L 655 J, rOg Thlrlana ala ✓ hiP Road 6r12� 1t 1f1— m 67152 ot21 49!90 4 4413 13136 Northaida High r C 00 Oa 1821145.% t h 1 �' 6/0- 69 137 Z �R �m IL J 1 4...012 r 1!5 North Lake 2121151 ✓ h m 571— 53!471 mr r` C �mM a _ r L 50178 4-620/605 J 1 4 r 52170 Paters 59188✓ .Creek 4631634- 128l220','n n� L 44128 4a�212 x514 Green Ride Road 33133✓ r h 1 r 1 ! 0— 111 105175� 1a 0 K Cove Road � . � v 6 K f1(*L470 L1841359 46 4-4911738 EIBClriC Road 0x11735 eC0 1621155✓ 17!47,T 6861574.--� 6781514-0l 1,ac O 2 F `� . 2 C. yF� V C M ;� N � DAVENPORT 3.OApproved Developments and Committed Improvements 3.1 Approved Developments Approved developments are developments that have been recently approved in the area, but not yet constructed. Per Roanoke County, there are no approved developments to be considered in this analysis, but the 11% annual growth rate would be sufficient to account for background traffic growth. 3.2 Committed Improvements Committed improvements are improvements that are planned by VDOT, Roanoke County, City of Roanoke, or a developer in the area, but not yet constructed. Based on the project scoping meeting, there are no committed improvements to be included in this analysis. 4.0 Methodology 4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards This analysis was conducted based on the VDOT Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM) and TIA Regulations Administrative Guidelines. The following table contains a summary of the parameters and assumptions: 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site -- Roanoke, VA 10 ..- - Peak Hour Factor Existing year: Overall observed PHF per intersection (PHF) Future years: 0.92 or overall observed PHF, whichever is higher Background Traffic 1 % Annual Growth Rate per year Signal Timin IPhasin Based on TOSAM guidelines Signalized and unsignalized: Synchro and SimTraffic Version Analysis Software 10.0 Freeway: VISSIM Version 7 Lane widths 12 -feet No -build scenarios: Based on existing turning movement counts by movement Future build scenarios: Calculated based on combination of no - Truck percentages build traffic and site traffic, which was considered to have a 10% heavy vehicle composition. See Supporting Documents section of Appendix for more information 1-581: 7% per VDOT 2016 traffic counts 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site -- Roanoke, VA 10 0 DAVENPORT 5.0 Capacity Analysis 5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria The Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes a term "level of service" to measure how traffic operates in intersections and on roadway segments. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of service "A" represents the best conditions and Level of Service "F" represents the worst. Synchro traffic modeling software was used to determine the level of service for studied intersections. VISSIM software was used to determine the level of service of interchange weaving segments as well as merge and diverge areas. All worksheet reports from the analyses can be found in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — Level of Service Criteria Signalized Intersection per Highway Capacity Manual Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Control Delay Per vehicle (sec) Level of Service Delay Range (sec) A < 10 A < 10 B >10and <20 B >10and <_15 C >20and <_35 C >15and <_25 D >35and <-55 D >25and <35 E >55and <80 E >35and<_50 F > 80 F > 50 Weaving Segments Level of Service Density clmilln Freeway Weaving Segment Multilane Distributor and Collector - Weaving Segments A < 10 < 12 B > 10 and <_ 20 > 12 and <- 24 C > 20 and < 28 > 24 and <_ 32 D > 28 and < 35 > 32 and 36 E > 35 and <- 43 > 36 and 40 F >43 >40 Merge and Diverge Areas Level of Service Density clmilln A <10 B > 10 and < 20 C >20and<_28 D > 28 and < 35 E > 35 F Demand exceeds capacity 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 11 DAVENPORT 6.0 2024 Build -out Analysis This section presents the assumptions, results, and recommendations for future build- out of the Wood Haven Site based on an assumed build -out year of 2024. 6.1 Trip Generation The trip generation potential of this site was calculated using TripGen 2013 software, which is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition. Table 6.1 below contains the results. While the specific users for this site are not [mown at this time, the types of uses will be restricted to limited industry, laboratories, research and development facilities, custom manufacturing and general office. For analysis purposes, this study assumed development of 550,000 square feet of a combination of limited industrial, office space, and research and development. There is the potential for different land uses, such as up to 900,000 square feet of either manufacturing or heavy industrial. The trip generation scenario in Table 6.1 below represents a maximum impact scenario and a threshold in terms of site traffic generation. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 12 Table Wood Haven Site Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Two -Way Land Use ITE Land Code Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit General Office 710 250 Th. Sq. Ft. GFA 2,634 350 48 61 297 Limited Industrial 110 50 Th GFA Ft 349 40 6 6 43 Research and Development Total 760 Unadjusted 250 Trips Th. Sq. Ft. GFA 2,028 239 629 49 103 42 109 1 240 680 6,011 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 12 0DAVENPORT 6.2 Trip Distribution Site trips for this proposed development were distributed based on existing traffic patterns. VDOT traffic counts indicate a directional factor of 53% traveling northbound on 1-581 in the AM peak and the reverse in the PM peak. It was considered that site traffic will be consistent with this pattern. This overall directional factor was used in combination with daily traffic volumes for each street in the study area in order to derive trip percentages for each street. This distribution was approved by VDOT and City staff. More information can be found in the Supporting Documents section of the Appendix. • 28% tolfrom the south on 1-581 16% tolfrom the south on Peters Creek Road • 15% tolfrom the northeast on 1-81 13% tolfrom the northwest on 1-81 • 12% tolfrom the east on Peters Creek Road 7% tolfrom the north on Electric Road • 5% tolfrom the south on Electric Road 4% tolfrom the south on Cove Road 6.3 Future No Build Traffic The 2024 future no build traffic volumes were computed by applying a 1 % compounded annual growth rate to the 2017 existing traffic volumes. Figure 6 shows the 2024 future no build traffic volumes for AM and PM peaks. 6.4 Total Traffic The 2024 build -out traffic volumes were computed as the sum of future no build volumes and site trips. Site trips are shown in Figure 7 for AM and PM peaks. Figure 8 shows the 2024 build volume totals. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site -- Roanoke, VA 13 _awe )�Ra {am,Jf '0 EL If _eXpointe 4 Parkways OUT-*{ OUT--, ` Z9) \_m .. , 0_ |\ a w 12% IN • ` h £ 16% IN 40% IN +rlan, _d 16% OUT ,\ !=- §,c Z. § % »r.+ .+ School Road Site Access z 84% OUT 4)_m!North Lake .1 »_ CIN mmce ,s m,--�\ \§ J/,*-ew Green Ridge Road aOUT ma»n--, J0k)§4c._. r9lkIN ) 41 _&- \ \k0 0� 0 taw Wiz/ m_G�d am!_ mw }_ W- �} \»I,jW ". r w f f°ra §-R. ( (2 w G .2 �/Z §a$ -_k W- �} \»I,jW ". r w f f°ra §-R. ( (2 w G .2 �/Z §a$ -_k DAVENPORT 6.5 Level of Service Results This section presents intersection capacity analyses for the following conditions during AM and PM peaks: • 2017 Existing Conditions • 2024 Future No Build Conditions • 2024 Future Build Conditions Levels of service summaries for each intersection are provided in the following pages. Efforts were made to improve the level of service for each lane group at each intersection to a LOS D where possible and to mitigate queuing issues. See Section 6.6 for queuing results. Recommendations for turn lanes at the site access are based on criteria in Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual. The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figure 9. The Synchro level of service output is included in the Appendix. 414/1$ 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 18 DAVENPORT 4/4/18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 19 0DAVENPORT 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 20 Table 6.6 - Green Ridge Road at Electric Road Level of Service by Approach (belay in seclveh) Scenario Overall _ LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound L Southbound L T L T R L I T R T R AM Peak Dour 0 Existing EEMEEMMEMM�m = 1 a 2024 No Build aMEEM ' ' aM '1• • !' 2024 Build : ��� '1 ' ' • ',• 2424 Build + Improvements PM Peak Hour ! . Existing 1 • aa��� • : .' 1 1 • a 2024 No Build ! , • 2024 Build : aa� ' • �� 1 2024 Build+ Improvements { II ! { : q : , I • Recommendations a • _ .. ... - - 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 20 Q DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site P Roanoke, VA 21 A 1.2 A 1.2 B 13.4IMMCM(l C 15.8 A (4.3) A 1.2 A 1.2 B 13.4 5.8 A 1.2 A 1.2 B 13.2 C 15.5 A (4.3) A 1.2 A 1.2 813.2 G 15.5 A 1.5 A 1.1 B (13.6) C 1 7.4 A (4.6) A 1.5 A 1.1 B 13.6 C 17.4 A8.0 A0.0 A1.1 B(13.5) D26.6 B 10.5 A(42) A 1.5 A 1.1 B 13.5 B 14.5 PM .-ak Hour A 2.4 A 1.0 B 14.5 A(43) A 2.4 A 1.0 B 14.5 C 21.8 A (4.5) A 2.4 A 1.0 B 14.9 A2.4 A1.0 B 14.9 C24.4 A 2.5 A 1.0 C 15.3 A (7.2) A 2.5 C 15.3 B 37.9 A 8.8 A 0.0 �(1.0) C(15.1) R 49.2 B 11.9 A (5.5) A2.5 C 15.1 1725.9 • Provide eastbound left turn lane on Cove Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper • Provide southbound left turn lane on Green Ridge Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate to er 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site P Roanoke, VA 21 DAVENPORT -•..Vialtto `.. s -... -•.6 lie 0 ` A (1.1) C (15.1) A 0.0 A 0.0 D 28.4 A 0.5 A 0.0 D 28.4 A(1.0) B 14.8 A0.0 A0.0 D26.4 (26.4) - E (60.0) D (38.6) E (61.8) D (39.3) - F (82.2) B (11.7) - C22.5 A0.0 A0.0 D (51.1j D (53.4) D (40.9) B (18.1) E 48.4 - D (38.7) D (523) C (27.5) -_TE (58.2) D (39.9) E (63.0) D - (43.5) F (81.7) B (14.4) - A 0.0 D 29.7 D (49.0) D (52.4) D (44.9) C (20.5) A (1.3) B 14.6 A 0.0 - D (53.1) C (27.4) E (64.9) D (39.5) E (63.0) D (52.0) - F (81.4) B (15.1) _ E 37.6 D (42.8) D (49.4) E (57.8) D (52.7) C (20.9) : - D (43.6) E (56.1) C (27.7) - E (57.9) D (38.3) E (61.0) D (54.6) - E (59.9) B (17.1) - .. D (52.0) D (52.4) D (55.0) C (20.8) such as Peters Creek Road, and • - is mainly due to a lack of sufficient gaps in traffic for left turns from the stop - controlled approach. These conditions are expected to be limited to peak - E (67.2) C (32.8) E (64.4) D (35.9) E (61.0) D (38.4) - E (69.1)IC (26.1) D (42.0) E (61.4) E (58.6) D (40.5) C (30.6) _ E (67.8) C (34.0) - E (62.6) D (36.5) E (62.1) D (43.3) - E (71.1) C (32.2) - .: D (45.7) E (62.1) E (57.3) D (45.0) D (36.3) - E (75.2) C (33.7) - E (63.5) D (36.4) E (62.1) - D (44.6) -E-(72.4) D (45.9)1- - D (52.1) E (68.6) E (58.1) D (46.2) D (48.4) E (69.6) C (34.7) - E (66.4) D (37.4) E (77.1) D (43.9) - F (84.0) C (34.4) - D {48.0) E (64.0) E (60.7) D (47.0) D (39.1) Optimize signal timing and coordinate with Peters Creek Road system timing -•..Vialtto `.. s lie 0 ` A (1.1) C (15.1) A 0.0 A 0.0 D 28.4 A 0.5 A 0.0 D 28.4 A(1.0) B 14.8 A0.0 A0.0 D26.4 A0.5 A0.0 D26.4 C22.5 A0.0 A0.0 E48.4 A(29) r A 3.2 A 0.0 E 48.4 A(1.1) B 13.6 A 0.0 A 0.0 D 29.7 A0.7 A0.0 D29.7 A (1.3) B 14.6 A 0.0 A 0.0 E 37.6 A 0.7 A 0.0 E 37.6 A (3.4) C (15. A 0.0 A 0.0 F 50.4 A 1.0 A 0.Q F 50.4 No improvements recommended • LOS EIF conditions (in both no -build and build scenarios) is a typical condition for stop -controlled approaches onto major streets such as Peters Creek Road, and • - is mainly due to a lack of sufficient gaps in traffic for left turns from the stop - controlled approach. These conditions are expected to be limited to peak periods. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 22 0 DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 23 • i • E C B E E C E D E D E 62.01(23.0)16.5 76.2 62.9 26.3 56.1 46.0 55.1 54.3 61.1 {4p9) C 30.4 E 61.5 D 54.3 E 59.8 E C B E EC E D D D E 62.3 24.1 17.2 74.4 63.3 26.5 55,3 45.7 53.8 53.2 61.1 (46.4) C 31.3 E61.8 D53.6 E59.5 F C B E F C E D D D E r . 210.6 24.1 17.2 74.2 83.6 28.2 _ 55.3 45.7 53.2 52.2 57.5 (76.8) F80.1 E79.2 D53.6 E56.7 D B B E D A E D E C r C 41.9 16.1 13.6 64.4 35.9 1.0 71.4 424 5.4 55_4)1 26.0 .. - (29.8) C23.6 C34.3 E66.2 G31.2 E C 6 FC !(215.8)24.5 E D E D E ' D 61.1 29,1 19,7 67.3 47.6 58.2 53.8 60.5 (36.1) C31.7 _(§5_17) c27.8 E64.3 E59.6 E C C F C C E D E D E r D 60.21(31.6)1(20,7 84.8 27.6 25.5 69.0 47.5 56.1(52.5)161.3 {37.7) C33.6 G29.4 E65.7 E59.7 E C F D C E D D D F r : F 65.01(3377121.8 84.7 35.0 27.6 71.9 48.1 54.9 49.5 548.4 (132.1) D 36.6 D36.4 E 68.2 F 462.0 D C B F G B E D E D r C 44.8 22.5 19.0 80.9 22.5 14.5 76.5 42.5 67.5 4 6.9 .. (32.9) 025.1 024.1 E71.2 D50.5 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 23 DAVENPORT - • i i Fill* •s • • •• • • •• • - F(81.1) C(20.1) 64.1 6.4 64.5 15.8 10.7 59.0 (49,8)o) A9.4 B 15.6 E59.0 E67.4 E A F B B E _ F (92.1) D - • : • C (21.8) 62.4 6,9 58.7 17,5 11.4 58.9 51.2 A9.8 B 17.2 E58.9 E74.3 E A E I B B E F D ! • C (22.5) 62.5 6.9(58-7)1(17.8)1(11.8)58.9 100.5 51.2 817.3 F58.9 E79.5 A9.7 D I A E C B E_ E I D ! C (20.3) 35,6 2.7 58.7 23.9 15.4 58.9 56.3 45.5 •• - A4.3 C23.1 E58.9 D51.7 'i, • E B E C B E E D • G (25.0) 59,3 13.0 74.4 22.8 18,1 59.8 64.0 49.5 816.8 C22.2 E59.8 E61.1 D B E C C E E D ! • : • C (26.3) 54.8 13.2 fi5.0 26.2 20.3 59.9 63.3 48.8 B 16.5 C 25.3 E 59.9 E 60.5 E B E C C E E D ! • C (28.2) 55.2 12.9 65.0 27.121.0 59.9 - 77.31(47.9)- B 16.3 C 26.0 E 59.9 E 72.6 C A EC C E E D ! C (26.1) 33.4 I 4.9 65.0 33.7 25.4 64.6 63.01(45.8)1 •• - - A7.2 G32.1 E64.fi E(60.4 - Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 24 DAVENPORT Table 6.12 - Peters Creek Road at North Lake Drive Level of Service by Approach (Delay in se_c/veh) Scenario Overall LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound _ L T R L T R L T R Southbound _ _ L T R AM Peak Hour Existing��� `• '• • 2024 No Build - " a� ��� • 1• , 2024 Build ��� ���aa • [Ci�71 2024 Build + � : � y, as }� � ��©� � • Improvements , • , PM Pear Hour Existing /: +: •: 2024 No Build as : �a !r .. • 2024 Build aO :1 a as •• 1 • . � i 2024 Build + �1 ����lC�J3 �; � • • � �a 171 Improvements Recommendations log 10,- - - - . - • 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site -- Roanoke, VA 2.5 DAVENPORT .. -,., , I,- .. -.., E B B D C B E DD D C (27,2) 65.7 19.9 14.4 53.$ 25.8 10.6 56.2 54.0 _ 54.0 40.2 C 25.2 C 22.2 D 54.6 D 50.5 E B B E I C B D D D D C(26.9) 69.4 19.6 13.4 57.2 25.4 10.1 54.8 53.2 52.3 40.2 C 25.3 C 22.0 D53.6D 49_.2 E C B E C B D D D D + C (27.7) 68.5 22.4 13.4 57.2 25.6 10.1 1(54.8)1(53-2) 52.3 40.2 C 27.1 C 22.2 D 53.6 D 49.2 E B B E C A E E E D • G 69.8 14.01(10.3)61.9 21.8 7.3 59.1 55.91(59.0 47.8 (24.4) G 22.2 E 56.9 E 56.8 B 16.6 E I B A E C A E D E D (72.7)1(1 58.0 55.01(58.8)47.1 (25.8 .5(L9)__(67.8)1(23.6)17.3 B 18.2 C 24.0 E 55.9 E 56.5 E B A E C A E D E D r • : 72.3 15.8 9.9 67.8 25.3 7.3 58.0 55.0 58.$ 47.1 (26.5) C25.4 E55.9 E56.5 818.5 No improvements recommended 4!4118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 26 0 DAVEMORT 4/4/18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 27 DAV EN30RT 6.6 Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis was conducted based on a traffic simulation of the study intersections using SimTraffic software. This simulation was carried out based on VDOT TOSAM guidelines, including a total of 10 runs of 60 minute length in order to obtain statistically reliable results. The tables that follow present maximum queue lengths for no build, future build, and future build with improvement scenarios. Queue lengths are then compared with the length of existing turn lane storage bays. This information was used to identify areas where improvements such as new turn lanes or extensions of turn lanes are needed. For locations with more than one lane per movement, the lane with the higher queue is reported. The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figure 9. Table 6.16 - Electric Road at Cove Road Max Queue fii _ 27 Full AM Peak Hour Queues Full NBLTR Existin Max Queu E3FiL AL 27 30 Max Queue ft 96 79 Full 72 Effective Storage ft Full 150 230 2024 No Buildj WBL BR NBR Max Queue ft 94 95 15 146 Fffective Stora e ft) Full 150 125 230 2024 Build Max QueUe ft 72 80 80 Effective Storage ft Full 150 1 230 2024 Build + Improvements $R- Max Queue(ft) 79 84 7 119 v Stara e (ft) 150 125 230 - -ExistingWBL WBR - SBL Max Queue ft 52 118 15 141 Effective Storage ft Full 150 125 230 2024_ No Build WBL XBR SBL Max Queue ft 50 117 15 107 Effective Storage ft Full 150 _ 125 230 2024 Build WBL WBR' Max Queue ft 52 114 15 115 _ Effective Storage ft Full 160 125 230 2024 Build + Improvements WBL WIB _ Max Queue (ft) 125 _ 137 7 100 Effective Storage ft Full 150 125 230 Table 6.16 - Wood Haven Road at Thirlane AM Peak Hour Queues Existing WBLTR Road NBLTR Max Queue fii _ 27 Full 30 2024 No B Effective StorAd Full NBLTR WBLTR Max Queu 27 30 Effective StorFull Full 2024Bu EBLTR- WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 28 DAVENPORT Max Queue ff 14 72 291 52 Lffective Storage (ft) Full Full Full Full 2024 Build + Ing rovernent Max Queue ft 11 58 2611 69 185 WB'. Effective Storage ft Effective Stora..eft Full Full Full EBR Existing� Max Queue (ft) A 72 L"�R 72 SBLTR 29 Effective Storage f# 24 200 Full Full _ Full 2024 No Build W `-` WBL SBLT'R Max Queue ft 74 55 29 Effective Stora e ft 2024 No Build ' Full Full Full 2024 Build - W 31 185 WBL Max Queue ft Effective Stora e ft 2024 Build 136 114 29 FLIT WBTR:_ 74 Full 122 Full fl_ 4 Build Irn provemetx EBLTR Max Queue (ft) 9 orage Full Full Full 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 29 Table 6.17 - Existin -- __ -Max Queue ft Fffective Stora e ft No BuildMax Wood Haven Road at Valleypointe AM Peak Hour Queues Parkway 54 185 66 Queue (ft EBTR 69 185 WB'. tFull2024 Effective Stora..eft 2024 Build Max Queue ft 20 Full EBR 98 185 WBL 205 Full a Effective Storage ft 2024 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft) QueuesPM Peak Hour 24 200 67 185 Effective Storage (ft Existing WBL NBLR Max Queue ft 74 185 96 Full Effective Storage ft 2024 No Build WBL NBLR Max Queue ft Lffective Storage (ft) EBTR 31 185 WBL 97 Full NBLR 2024 Build Max Queue ft 22 Full EBR 34 200 73 185 WBL 63 185 161 FLT NBLR 159 Full Effective Storage (ft) 2024 Build + Improvements Max Queue ft Effective Storage ft 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 29 DAVENPORT Table 6.18 - Electric Road at Green Ridge Road AM Peak Hour Queues Existin n NBLTR WBR Max Queue (ft) NBT NBR SBL SB7 SBTR ax Queue ft Lffecteve Stora2e (ft) 282 72 Full 127 36 40 105 147 tive Storage ft 575 Full Full 550 250 Full Full X024 No Build EBLTR W8LT WBR Full NBT Ng S Y R Max Queue ft 29 304 54 1 29 '.'6 42 121 103 ,ctive Storage ft F_ Lill 575 Full 98 Full 6150 `250 Full Full 024 Build I WBLT WEIR NBT NBR SB SBTR Max Queue ft Max Queue ft 1 364 55 57 132 36 62 80 100 Effective Storage ft 200 575 Full Full 550 250 Full Full 2024 Build + Im rovements JEPLT Wl . NBT L.TR _ mm Queue R) _ 56 Max Queue (ft) 17 278 59 Effective Storaor, ft 173 54 44 147 139 Effective Storage (ft) Full 575 Full VMLTR Full 550 250 Full Full 213 145 5; 118 17-ffective Storage (ft) Full Full FLIN Existing Full 2024 Build BT_ NBR SBL,- SJ3T SBTR Max Queue ft 29 267 52 217 58 10_4 103 94 Effective Storage ft Full 575 Full EBL. Full 550 250 Full Full 2024 No Build dIIIIIIIIIIIII 67 1 73 60 93 78 $BL 200 Max Queue ft 27 252 74 212 103 63105 119 Effective Storage ft Full 575 Full Full 550 250 Full Full 2024 Build NBL N13T NBR S Max Queue (ft) AWEd 29 330 53 20 213 84 63 82 96 Effective Storage ft Full 575 Full 300 Full 550 250 Full Full 2024 Build + Irn rovements NBL NBT NBR SB' [ Max Queue (ft) A& jig 20 256 70 5 243 99 86 115 127 E=ffective Stora e Full 575 Full 300 Full 550 250 Full Full Table Ridge Road Cove Road AM Peak Hour Queues Existin !LTR NBLTR SBLTR Max Queue (ft) 70 59 49 76 Lffecteve Stora2e (ft) Full Full Full Full 2024 No Built) LTR SBJ_TR Max Queue ft 54 37 68 117 Effective Storage ft - Full Full Full Full 2024 Bui - l -TR NBLTR SBLTR Max Que.i.. 112 37 51 98 Lffc,ctive Storage (ft) Full Full Fill Full 2024 Build + Improvements WBLTR NBLTR SBL SBTR Max Queue ft 47 1 77 62 57 84 Fffeetive Storage 200 Full Full Full 200 Full ! e Existing_ _ _ LTR - - L.TR _ mm Queue R) _ 56 81 46 79 Effective Storaor, ft Full Full Full Full - 2024 No Build VMLTR NBLTR Max Queue (ft) 213 145 5; 118 17-ffective Storage (ft) Full Full FLIN Full 2024 Build WBLTR INSILTIR S Max. Queue (ft) 116 100 1 52 198 E=ffective Storage ft Full Full i Full Full 2024 Build + Improvements EBL. WBLTR NBLTR SBL S Max Queue {ft) 67 1 73 60 93 78 FffecWe Storage (ft) 200 1 Full Full 200 Full 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 30 DAVENPORT 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 31 -1 101 l , • Max Queue (ft)' _ 50 86 Effective Stora e ft _ 275 Full 2024 No Build L SBLR Max Queue (ft) 50 Existirit 122 Effective Stora e ft L _NST NBTR SBL SBTS , Max Queue 11`0 532 250 241 100 175 304 296 129 166 212 Effective Storage (ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 No B Max Queue (ft) 227 WLT W 50 433 NBT 400 Full MIOTR Max Que 565 250 216 100 175 335 335 153 188 208 Effective 5[o Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 Build Full 2024 No Build _ Max Queue ft Max Queue 677 250 392 100 175 402 354 132 302 331 Effective Stelae Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 Build * Im rovements (effective Storage ft 275 _ WELT Full �i�'` 2024 Build _+ In7 rovements, se-FAI Max Queue ft} 541 250 332 100 174 414 401 145 236 250 Effective Storage ft. Full 250 Full 100 L.L75Full Full 175 Full Full e Existing EB T.:' t Nl3T N63T , S i SBT SBT . Max Queue (ft) 357 250 437 100 174 316 327 174 424 423 Effective Stora e ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 No Build NPT M_ BTR SBL SBT SBTR Max Queue (ft) 554 250 412 100 175 328 290 174 346 312 Effective Storage ft i Lill 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 Build EB i 8 Max Queue (ft) 733 250 694 100 174 284 282 175 406 425 Effective Storage ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2024 Build + R7lprovemen Max Queue (ft) 641 250 587 100 175 362 343 115�FullFull Effective Storage ft) Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 31 Max Queue (ft)' _ 50 86 Effective Stora e ft _ 275 Full 2024 No Build L SBLR Max Queue (ft) 50 122 Effective Stora e ft 275 Full 2024 Build BLR Max Queue (ft 275 396 22 56 767 Effective Storage (ft) 275 Full Full Full Frill 2024 Build + Improvements WBT WEiTR SBLR Max Queue (ft) 227 53 6 50 433 Effective Storage(ft) 400 Full lull Full Full PM Peak Hour Queues BLIFF Max Queue (ft 50 23 118 Effective Storage (ft) 275Full Full 2024 No Build _ Max Queue ft 75 22 159 Effective Storage ft 275 Full Full 2024 Build EBL — SBLR Max Queue (ft 74 75 159 (effective Storage ft 275 Full Full 2024 Build _+ In7 rovements, _ SBLR Max Queue (ft) 90 23 310 Effective Stara e ft 275 Full Full 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 31 DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven; Site -- Roanoke, VA 32 Z,., i M UT ,,. -,.. Existing TIS SBL SB Max Queue ftell 135 25 330 39 122 99 2i0 Effective Stora e ftull 135 Full 325 Full 100 Fall 2024 IVa Build WBR NBLTR SBL Max Queue ft 80 114 109 272 209 39 118 100 Effective Storage ft 165 Full Full Full Full 325 Full 00 2024 Build EBL BB _- .. BL .W TR SBL SBTR Max Queue f1 - 61 114 143 24 261 38 89 100 671 Effective Storage (ft) -111W 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full 2024 Build + Im rovements Max Queue (ft) 76 65 79 56 340 46 99 100 275 Effective Stora e (ft 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full Leme -'8T Existing_ -8TR-, . L W`BR IVBL ' ' SB. Max QueUe ft 156 246 224 24 322 80 224 97 151 Effective Storage (ft) 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full 2024 No Build BTR Max_Queue ft} 157 160 _W 201 47 417 32.0 228 99 281 Effective Stora e 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full 2024 Build _E13T SBTR WBL WBT WSR Max Queue (ft) 98 139 153 24 382 102 186 99 408 Effective Stora e fl 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 _ rUII 2024 Build +Improvements LBT SBTR WBL W S.BL SBTR Max Quelle (1`0 127 165 120 Full 132 Full 90 135 347 Full 72 1 325 1 96 Full 99 100 311 Full Eftectmi Storage (fl) 414118 163045 Wood Haven; Site -- Roanoke, VA 32 0 DAVENPORT 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 33 TR OTM .� WBLT WBT on WBR ITA Existing -- --, NBLTR Max Queue (ft) 49 158 122 130 138 30 28 352 125 effective Stora e ft 210 Full Full Full Fuil 225 Full Full 125 2024 No R -H BL i 69 101 159 T 156 WBR 53 353 125 Max Queue ft49 ective Stora e (ft) 2.10 Full Full Full Full 22.5 Full 125 2024 Build EBL I EBT I EBTR R NBLTR Max Queue "ft' 29 109 132 108 153 30 28 307 125 Effective Storage ft 210 FLO Full Full Full 225 Full Full 125 2024 Build + Im rovements Max Queue ft EBL 67 EBT 133 EBTR 119 WBLT 95 114 36 22 417 125 Stara e istin 210 t 1 Full MU Full -EBS Full e BIT Full 225 Full R Full L7 125 SBR Maaueue ft 135 135 136 70 67 54 45 223 125 Effective Storage (ft) 2..10 Full FLP Full Full 225 Full Full 125 2024 No Build EBL EBT EBTR WBLT WBT WBR SBLT SBR Max Queue ft Effective Storage (ft) 95 210 66 48 67 66 54 50 333 125 Full Full Full Full 2.25 Full Full 125 2024 Build EBL EBT EBTR WBLT WBT WBR NBLTR Max Queue ft 169 i86 Full EBT 67 Full EBTR _69 Full WBLT 49 Full WBT 62 225 WBR 28 269 125 Effective Storage ft 210 Full Full 125 2024 Build + EBL lm rovements _ NBLTR SBL'T' _ _ SB Max Queue ft 97 76 75 134 145 72 46 270 125 Effective Storage (q 210 Full Full I Full I Full 225 Full F Li 11 L 125 414!18 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 33 DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 34 `•.. . .- . .e My.• .� ExiBtin _'R WBT W_ T NBR SBLT ,. Max Queue ft 199 301 19 152 283 225 68 48 261 81 Effective Stora e ft 275 Full 325 25o F 1 225 Full 100 FO 375 2024 No Build 'EBR WBL WBT W SBLT SBR Max Queue ft 194 276 19 132 314 151 50 65 263 65 _ Effective_ Stora e ft 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 2024 Build E8 Max Queue (ft) 194 288 19 248 264 225 71 48 313 82 Effective Stora e fE' 275 F- jll 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 2024 Build + Improvements EBL EBT EBR WBUL WBT WBR NBLT Max Queue ft 247 322 95 196 292 209 53 78 266 73 Effective: Storage e (ft 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 A; M-11GUIP e E_xiM EBL E13T EBR WBR NBLT NBR 5_ BLT S_ BR Max Queue (ft) 131 282 19 '150 272 225 135 92 197 84 Effective Storage (ft)275 Ful! 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 2024 No Build EBL EBT EBR WBL. WBT WBR NBLT NBR Max Queue (ft) 130 30_3 18 154 296 225 70 94 265 65 Effective Storage ft 275 FLO 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Ful! 375 2024 Build WBL WBT NBR SBLT Max Queue ft 157 304 19 249 379 225 91 92 329 46 Effective Storage ft 275 Full 325 250 Fuli 225 Full 100 Full 375 2024 Build + Im rovements L. WI3T WBR_ Max Queue (ft 139 255 58 221 387 225 118 97 242 56 Effective Stora e (ft 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 34 r N Z' F w Y W � r O W W Nr zr FC LL Id z II °�� ll m O � Wood Haven - 000 �� � mp ? ED as a ry U a 2 1 Y ea 300' Valleygolnte tr Parkway FL -4 �tiiir"J lit FULL i t.wo• t FULL 90 I-887 �2« 84��ae n H I 9� Thirlane dam Road i �_ ii 5Te ez �o n`ezo �1PCY p23 4r Northside High_ �l School Road o00 _' ey�� ISKe-H 375 hiir Site Access a North LakeQ� ooa Drive FULL) v 0 o 25' � iR l � r H r t30' Peters Creek aoo Road 120.1 a Green Ridge B e rp c7 Road a a rc o v o U Y l7 Love Road CO a LL' p ,a U fe a m� 450' fl t70' (7 4— 4� {� Y � Electric Road 1L r QO• W 00o 20®• `. Wf� ai 200•'1 o 000 DAVENPORT 7.0 2030 Design Year Analysis A 2030 design year analysis was performed the study intersections. This section l recommendations for this analysis. 7.1 2030 Traffic Volumes in order to review the long term capacity at resents the assumptions, results, and 2030 design year build volumes were obtained by summing 2030 no build volumes and site trips for the Wood Haven Road Site. The 2030 design year no build traffic volumes were computed by applying a 1% compounded annual growth rate to the 2017 existing traffic volumes over a thirteen (13) year period. Design year no build volumes are shown in Figure 10. Site trips are the same as those shown in Figure 7, Figure 11 shows the 2030 design year build volumes for AM and PM peaks. 414/18 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 36 IJ u Y `1 +-1124 a J14 1-24185 z W w F Wood Haven Road u • 1 a o z Z 17af272 J ia15—e hir _ it w 115!381 - a � m B V a° l; Pt aF€ 23132 a� egg 1.49fA4 4-32118 1~ x242197 J14 x691157 vg2 boa 9 Valleypoinle a o itParkway 297113,) hir Na'e_ 75131-+ Iss7-1 ofla� Ba=Fp^ fl 25D gp' #ga�g3 1.561 $ L 13f 17 r27VIN J1 -rnirtane 9 r9J hir Road 7114f 1l1� 912, n+v 931152 n hm L561192 J 4 4 513 x15143 Northsld8 High 0 -Wicial Road zl9nssJ hir� 7119 7at4z� J1 51te Access_ owm `0f7 57f487J hi J 1 4--0 2 1- 118 18197'7 N.Ah Lake 2961172) 9I1� h r 72153i H ai1r571 v J Peters coo h I rCreok } 671113) 5431814- 146l259 vH� IL 59 f 32 J�4 �7rz r6rs Green Ridge -- Road d2Ys1J "lir 1101 123f 193 1 0 C V b K d 4 f} K FiP4e Road 1 b m VC`�W- 1.2281412 Be55 4571/8421k+4f- 183fi Electric Road 22'1164.1 19157 r761f857�+ 774/59791t o a o � IJ u Y `1 a F � u • 1 DAVENPORT 7.2 Level of Service Results This section presents intersection capacity analyses for the following conditions during AM and PM peaks: • 2030 Design Year No Build Conditions 2030 Design Year Build Conditions Levels of service summaries for each intersection are provided in the following pages. Efforts were made to improve the level of service for each lane group at each intersection to a LOS D where possible, and to mitigate queuing issues. The recommendations for the 2030 Design Year analysis are the same as those shown in Figure 9 for the Year 2024 analysis. 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 39 DAVENPORT 41411$ 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 40 Q DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 41 Table 7.6 Road t Peters a_ Creek Road ---Cove Level of Serviy ce b Approach (Delay in seclveh) Scenario Overall LOS Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T Southbound R L T R AM Peak Hour 2030 Design Year ■ a� a .. • [i:�'J]lfiui�lJ�lfl'�iiJl�•JJ� No Build 2030 Design Year as a Build 2030 DesignYear i �� �� • a �� Bu Id ' Improvements , 1 PM Peak Hour 2030 Design Year ��� , r • a� �, No Build 1 2030 Design Year Budd .1 • 2030 � �© � , , +Year Build •' ' ' ' ' i Improvements Recommendations 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 41 Q DAVENPORT 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 42 E C B E FC E D D D E E (58.5) 69.3 25.3 17.4 73.9 93.9 27.0 56.2 45.5 53.8 53.1 61.8 C 33.1 F 89.7 D 54.2 E 60.1 F C I B E FC E D p I D E ' F (89.8) 237.2 25.3 17.4 73.6 110.3 28.21(5&2)1(4,5.5 53.7 52.5 57.7 F 88.0 F 102.9 Q 54.2 E 56.9 Q B B E D A E D_ E C C (34.2) 42.2 16.4 13,1 66.6 48.5 0.8 _ 75.6 42.4 55.6 26.6 .. - C23.8 D45.6 E69.5 031.8 E C C F C C E D E D E D (41.6) 61.41(34.2)1(21.3)84.2 34.4 1.26.11(72.2)1(47.3)56.fl 52.5 65.9 D 35.8 D 35.9 E 68.4 E 63.2 E D I C F D C E D E D F + F (144.0)_(66.5 36.2 22.2 84.1 47.8 28.0 75.9 47.8 55.4 49.7 600.4 Q 38.7 Q 48.4 E 71.5 F 503.2 D C B FC B F D E D + C (34.7) 45.1 23.6 18.9 84.4 I 25.5 14.6 82.8 42.3 69.9 47.8 C 26.0 C 27.1 E 76.5 D 51.8 • Provide second eastbound left turn lane on Peters Creek Road with 400 feet of storage and appropriate taper . Reconfigure southbound approach to provide two (2) right turn lanes and a • �" combined left/ through lane • Provide right turn overlap phases on all approaches • Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 42 DAVENPORT 414/18 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 43 Table 7.9 - Peters Creek Road at Wood Haven Road Level of Service by Approach (Delay in sec/veh) Scenario Overall 'Westbound LOS Eastbound L T R L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R AM Peak Hour 2030 Design Year+• `►�+,. a a �, �a No Build , 2030 Design Year Build 2030 Design Year Build +�� :: ■ • a f a : 1 a Improvements PM Peak Hour 2030 Design YearEM �a�� � : � . � , �� ' � • a No Build 2030 benign Year Build 2030 Design Year Build + + • Improvements j .: i• •I • Recommendations •. - . _ . ... _. _ . _ 414/18 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 43 DAVENPORT 3.4 A 8.5 C 30.5 D 48.9 A A Road at A B C D C B (13.0) 2.1 3.9 8.3 14.9 30.5 - f54.3)1(25.7) seclveh) A3,8 A8.6 C 30.5 D48.9 A A Overall A BC D C B (11.8) 2.5 4.8 3.4 14.9 30.5 _ _ 54.3 25.7 �- - A4.7 A3.9 G30.5 D48.9 T Northbound R L A A A A D E D A (7.7) 1.4 2.2 - 2.1 0.5 44.4 67.1 36.7 No Build A 2.2 A 1.8 D 44.4 E 60.0 AA A A D E D At 5) 1.8 2.3 2.1 _ 0.5 44.41(67.1 _ - 1(36.71 A2.2 A1.8 D44.4 E60.0 r- • - B B A A D E D _ • B (13.0) 11.2 14.5 3.0 0.51(44.4)167.1 _ _ 36.7 No Build A2.6 D44.4 E60.0 No improvements recommended Table 7.12 - Peters Creek Road at Northside High School Road Level of Service by Approach (Delay in seclveh) Scenario Overall LOS L Eastbound T R Westbound L T Northbound R L T Southbound R L T R AM Peak Hour r 2030 Design Year • • as No Build 2030 Design Year ■�, • a��a �' �' Build . + r r i . , PM Peak Hour 2030 Design Year_ No Build ` p •I 2030 Design Year��a Build r Recommendations - - - • - • 414/18 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 44 U- DAVENPORT 414/18 163045 Wood Haven Site -- Roanoke, VA 45 DAVENPORT 7.3 Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis was conducted based on a traffic simulation of the study intersections using SimTraffic software. This simulation was carried out based on VDOT TOSAM guidelines, including a total of 10 runs of 60 minute length in order to obtain statistically reliable results. The tables that follow present maximum queue lengths for no build, future build, and future build with improvement scenarios. Queue lengths are then compared with the length of existing turn lane storage bays. This information was used to identify areas where improvements such as new turn lanes or extensions of turn lanes are needed. For locations with more than one lane per movement, the lane with the higher queue is reported. The recommended improvements for the 2030 Design Year are the same as those shown in Figure 9 for the Year 2024 analysis. Table 7.15 - Wood Haven OTM Road AM Peak Hour I AM 2030 No Buil - - 2030 No Build - IBR Max Queue (ft) 'SBL- Max (queue ft 28 145 15 _ 57 Effective Stora e {ftjjrw77 - - - 2030 Build 150 WBL.TF 125 230 2030 BuildL W§FyfiEr- 130 NBR SBL Max Queue (ft) 74 116 WBLTR 15 81 _ Ftfective Storage (ft Full 150 125 230 2030 Build + Improvements _ WBL WBR NBT FLill Full Max Queue T) 126 115 3 NBLTR 127 Effective Stora Full 150 Full 230 2030 No • e I T`l � NMax 2030 No Build WBR 110 NBP, SBL.. Max Queue ft - _ 53 92 Full 14 127 Effective Storage (ft) Full 150 125 230 2030 Build - WBk 130 NB S Max Queue ft 193 150 18 78 Effective Storage ft Full 150 _ 125 230 2030 Build + improvements wVBL W A � 71113T ShN BR SLL Max Queue ft 124 131 2 10 123 27 Fffe.ctive Storage Full 150 Full 125 230 Full Table 7.15 - Wood Haven Road at Thirlane Road AM Peak Hour Queues 2030 No Buil - - - - SBLTR Max Queue (ft) 110 73 28 Effective Storage (ft) Full Full Full - - - 2030 Build SBLTR. WBL.TF _ N SBLTR Max Queue ft 14 130 134 28 Effective Storage 'ft WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 2030 Build + Improvements- 73 Max Queute Full FLill Full Effective Sto SBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 2030 No I T`l � NMax Queu 110 73 28 Effective Sto) Full Full Full 2030 Bu Max Queue ft 14 130 134 28 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 46 Q DAVENPORT W 030 No Build ax Queue ft ctive Storage (ft) 2030 Build ax Queue (ft) Effective Storage ft 2030 Build + Irn ro�nts Max Queue ft Effective Storage ft _ 2030 No Build _ Max Queue (fl) Effective Stora e ft _ 2030 Build Max Queue (ft) Effective Storage (ft) _2030 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft) Effective Storage (ft) 255 1 74 196 53 ON: roll 110411 10717m 117 1 118 575 2030 No Build q WBL Max Queue ft 550 250 67 90 Effective Storage (ft) WBLT 249 WS 52 185 Full 2030 Build 144 139 WBL BLIF Max Queue (ft) Full 550 50 180 Effective Stora - (ft) EBLTR WBLT 304 185 Full 0 Build + improvements - SBT 152 L N13LR Max Queue (ft) Full Queues 53 13 63 238 ., Full SET#i 200 185 Full WITITTZ011111 t4 Full 550 250 --2--36-N-6--B—Cl Fill L NBLR Max Queue (fL2 -- ; ,St3L 32 101 active Stara .(ft 323 72 185 Full 2030 Build EBTR 117 WBL NBLR Max Queue ft) 19 550 54 230 Effective Storage ft Full WBLT 185 Full 30 Build + Improvements EBS' 1. SBR _ WB. .LR Max Queue (ft) 2 34 67 161 Effective Storage (ft) Full 200 185 Full W 030 No Build ax Queue ft ctive Storage (ft) 2030 Build ax Queue (ft) Effective Storage ft 2030 Build + Irn ro�nts Max Queue ft Effective Storage ft _ 2030 No Build _ Max Queue (fl) Effective Stora e ft _ 2030 Build Max Queue (ft) Effective Storage (ft) _2030 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft) Effective Storage (ft) 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 47 255 1 74 196 53 62 117 1 118 575 1=u11 Fuil 550 250 Full Full 27 WBLT 249 WS 52 126 36 41 144 139 Full 575 Fun Full 550 250 Full Full EBLTR WBLT 304 198 170 NBR 54 SHL 51 SBT 152 SB 148 _20 Full PM 29 575 Peak Hour 254 Full Queues 53 Full 231 550 NSR. 101 250 S$L 105 Full SBT 7€3 Full SET#i 99 Full 575 Full Full 550 250 Full Fill WBLT W8 -- ; ,St3L SBT 323 72 223 130 104 89 117 575 Full Full 550 250 Full Full EBLTR WBLT WF3'R NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBTR 29 318 64 265 229 115 88 123 128 Full 575 Frill 300 Full 550 250 Ful) Full 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 47 DAVENPORT Table 2030 No Build - Cove „I -... & , -.., WBLTR NBL -.:. SBLTR Max Queue (ft) 96 57 70 Queues 9Ei Effective Storage (ft) --2030 Full Full Full Om Full Build__ Max Queue (ft) 94 WBZTR 37 74 5L 140 Effective�Stora e ft 2030 Build + Improvements -Max OLWUe (ft 53 Full Full 58 Full 73 67 Full 78 Effective Stora e ft 2030 No Build_ 200 - w BLTR Full WBLTR Full 200 Full Max Queue ft Full 265 98 74 Full 95 Effective Storage {ft) 2030 Build _ Max Queue ft Full Full 136 Full BL, . 182 Full 69 _ W Full 183 Effective,Storage(ft) _ NBT Full Full Full Full 2030 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft) — EBS 598 WBI_TR 175 SUL SBTR 75 5 90 63 107 81 Effective Storage (ft) 200 Full Full Full 200 Full Table 7.19 - Cove -... at Peters Creek -.:. AM Peak Hour Queues 20_30 No BuPEd Om _Nt3T . NST 5L SSI- __ Max Quetrft) 776 250 298 100 175 431 408 279 298 Effective Storage ft' Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full Full Full 2030 Build _ W NBL NBT Max. Queue (ft) 429 250 598 100 175 362 333 JB 231 286 Effective Storage (ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full Full Full 2030 Build + EBLT EBR WBLT WBR NBL NBT NBTR SBT SBTR Improvefneuts - Max Queue ft 687 250 547 100 175 392 374 166 243 252 Effective Storage ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Fall Full 2030 No Build EBLT IWBL NqL SBL SBT SBTR Max Queue (ft) 432 250 504 100 174 344 330 170 414 429 Effective Storage ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2030 Build 7 LT. #R Nffr9W NBTR SBL SBT'. TR Max Queue ft 1550 250 1010 100 175 369 344 175 1023 1036 Effective Stora_,jc eft) Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 2030 Build + EBLT EBR WBLT WBR NBL NBT NST R S S 13TR Improvements _ Max Queue ft 873 250 848 100 175 351 345 175 643 664 Effective Storage ft Full 250 Full 100 175 Full Full 175 Full Full 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site – Roanoke, VA 48 DAVENPORT 2030 No Max Que373 r4VKq M-- IN Zf. f I-AkfILM. M: f P, && B 386 320 250 'Ifty.f f f 300 Nf3LT 197 EV13R 60 99 73 287 Effective Storage fl 2030 No Build Full 325 WBTR SBLR Max Queue(ft j 52 350 22 135 Effective Storage (ft - 275 - Full Full - 2030 Build EBL EBT WBTR LR Max Queue ftp 275 403 52 545 Effective Storage (ft 275 Full Full FLIII 2030 Build + Improvements EBL EB 228 SBLR Max Queue ft 303 99 250 775 Effective Storage ft 400 Full 460 Full Full Moll EBL E13T EBR No Build ' 13T -_- -- - _ _2030 _ Max Quetae �ft� 57 41 139 Effective Storage -(ft 275 206 Fufl Full - 2030 Build _ 93 124 WBT IM 134 Max Queue firth 112 Full Full 19 22 219 Effective Storage (f� 275 Full Full Full Full 2030 Buil fm ro ants Max Queue ft 367 556 SBLR 249 90 74 24—And 371 117 275 FFuli 355 Effective Storage ft Full 2030 No Max Que373 r4VKq M-- IN Zf. f I-AkfILM. M: f P, && B 386 320 250 703 f f 300 Nf3LT 197 EV13R 60 99 73 287 Effective Storage fl 375 Full 325 250 Full 300 Full 350 460 Full Full 2030 Build - EBT EBR WBL WBT R S . -_- T SBR Max Queue (ft) 375 720 75 249 1577 300 199 41 92 110 228 Effective Storage ft 375 Full 325 250 Full 300 Full 350 460 Full Full 2030 Build + Improvements EBL E13T EBR WE3 13T Max Queue (ft) 293 253 82 206 484 284 235 93 124 134 Effective Storage ft 2030 No Bulld 500 Full Full 325 Full Full 300 Full 350 460 Max Queue ft 367 556 325 249 566 74 214 59 117 52 355 Effective Storage ft 375 Full 325 250 Full 300 Full 350 460 Full Full 2030 Build Max Queue ft 374 494 320 250 490 290 334 54 173 2279 2458 Effective Storage ft 375 Full 325 250 Full 300 Full 350 460 Full Full 2030 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft 169 378 BR 230 208 T 375 WB 194 318 T� SE3L 54 236 240 Effective Storage {ftj 500 Full Full 325 Full 300 Full 350 a(0 Full 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 49 DAVENPORT Table 7.22 - 2030 No Build � 4/4/18 Peters AM EBI_ Creek Peak EBT Road at Hour Queues EBTR Wood Haven WB' - `WBT Road W13 .. �B . Queue ft 154 187 228 47 302 41 98 100 366 _Max Effective Storage ft 155 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full 2_030 Build Max Queue (ft) E 115 BT 118 EBTR 143 Wf3L 135 WBI 412 r 57 TR 139 SRL 100 SBTR 693 Effective Storage ft 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full 2034 Build + Improvements -- Max Queue ft _ I 77 55 74 BL 61 W13 350 57 103 100 7R 296 Effective Stora aft 2030 No Build Max Queue (ft) 165 156 Full 198 Full e 182 135 135 Full 400 325 100 Full 200 100 99 FUll 259 Effective Storage ft 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 Full 100 Full - -- 2030 Build W EBTR WBL WBT W13R NBI-TR 9BL SBTR Max Queue (ft) 164 254 247 134 348 104 166 99 449 Effective Storage (ft) 165 Full Full 135 full 325 Full 100 Full 2030 Build + Improvements _ R WSL WBT WBR NBLTR S.B 135 114 132 83 367 103 202 99 336 165 Full Full 135 Full 325 1 Full 100 Full- ull 41411f3 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 50 DAVENPORT 2030 No Build Max Queue {ft 28 137 .. 179 151 WST 157 W13R 30 =0 0 SBLT SB 331 125 Fffective Stora e 2030 Build 210 EBL Full EBT l=ull Full Full _ T 225 B Full 125 SBL 389 125 Max QL.leue (ft) 48 110 70 155 179 30 Effective Storage (ft) 210 Full Full Full Full 225 196 Full 125 2030 Build + Improvements_ Max Queue ft EBL 53 EBT 131 EBTIR ? 132 1 9LT- 100 . 103 . 28 € SBLT SBR _M 14 404 125 Effective Storage (ft) 2030 No Build Max Queue ft t10ull 95 Full 89 Full 49 Full 69 225 107 Full Full SBLT 125 SBR 50 217 125 Lffective Stara a ft) 'BLT ull Full Full Full 225 Full Full 125 2030 guild Max Queue(ft) 92 71 72 86 'WBT 108 WSR 52 NBLTR 52 S' 244 125 Effective Storage (ft) 2030 Build + Im proverne. , Max Queue (ft) 210 132 Full 218 Full 232 Full 143 Full A&B-I 145 225 IAR 73 Full Full 125 46 289 125 Effective Stora e 210 Full Full Full Full 225 Full Full 125 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 51 =M W15015frili =0 0 . OJILZIP 2030 0 INVM Rwls= pwbT SBC, Max Queue 00 196 302 19 250 486 225 49 67 242 65 Effective Storage (ft) 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 2030 Build EmmWt3L 'BLT N . Max Queue (ft) 274 310 38 1281 285 225 69 46 261 105 Effective Storage (ft) 275 1 Full 1 325 250 Full 1 225 Full 100 Full 375 2030 Build + Improvements Max Queue (ft 252 344 28 221 338 225 7) 77 293 83 Effective Storage ft 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 e 2030 No Build WBT VV,SR NBLT NBR SBLT SBR Max Queue (ft 131 320 1 20 249 1 355 225 J 90 92 241 67 Effective Stora e 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 2030 Build B: Max Queue ft 91 338 43 249 405 225 138 100 253 66 Effective Storage eft 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 1 Full 100 Full 375 2030 Build + Improvement offffL -13T E iL WBT JN11 - Max Queue it 118 251 56 249 4fl5 225 129 99 246 64 Effective Storage 275 Full 325 250 Full 225 Full 100 Full 375 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 51 U DAVENPORT 8a0VISSIM Interchange Analysis At the request of VDOT, a freeway merge and diverge analysis was carried out in order to review traffic operations at the interchange of 1-581 and Peters Creek Road. This simulation was performed using VISSIM software, and a 10 -run simulation of 60 minutes each was performed for each scenario. This simulation also included adjacent intersections on Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway and at Thirlane Road in order to understand any weaving or queuing issues that may impact the interchange. Screenshot of VISSIM Mode! 414116 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 52. DAVENPORT The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 8.1 below. The future build without improvements scenario indicates LOS E / F conditions on eastbound Peters Creek Road. This is due to the combination of capacity issues at the nearby signalized Valleypointe Parkway intersection, as well as insufficient acceleration lane lengths on the ramps from 1-581 to Peters Creek Road. A weaving issue exists on eastbound Peters Creek Road between the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp and Valleypointe Parkway. This is due to the combination of background and site traffic coming off the ramp, merging onto eastbound Peters Creek Road, and seeking to weave into the left turn lane at Valleypointe Parkway. Only 650 feet of spacing between this off -ramp and Valleypointe Parkway exists for this weaving area. Based on both the VISSIM and Synchro / SimTraffic analyses, it has been recommended to signalize the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp at its intersection with eastbound Peters Creek Road. The westbound direction of Peters Creek Road does not need to be signalized since it is median -separated. This improvement would resolve existing weaving and safety issues on Peters Creek Road by providing a protected, signalized phase during which traffic from 1-551 can turn right and proceed toward the appropriate lane at the Valleypointe Parkway intersection. To signalize the off -ramp, its approach onto Peters Creek Road should be realigned to a location approximately 1,100 feet (center to center) from Valleypointe Parkway, with dual right turn lanes on the approach. This improvement, together with the recommended capacity improvements at the Peters Creek Road / Valleypointe Parkway signalized intersection, provides adequate queue storage along Peters Creek Road based on the VISSIM and SimTraffic simulations. The recommendations are summarized in Figure 9. Table• Analysis 2030 Design Year AM Peak 2030 Design Year PM Peak Facility Section No Build without Build with No Build without Build with Build Improvements Improvements Build Improvements Improvements Weaving Peters Creek Road Between 1-581 NB A (11.9) B (20.0) B (14.8) A B (12.2) A (11.9) Eastbound and SB Rams 11.8 Peters Creek Road Between 1.581 NB B (17.9) B (18.4) B (19,7) B B (20.8) B (23.3) Westbound and SB Rams 21.0 Between Peters 1-581 Northbound Creek Road EB and B (12.3) B (11.7) B (12.8) (15.6) B (15.7) B (15.6) WB Ramps Between Peters 1-581 Southbound Creek Road EB and B (13.6) B (14) B (14,0) (12.7) B (13.3) B (13.9) WB Ramps Merge / Diver e Peters Creek Road Merge with on-ramp D (30.0) F (48.8) Signal D D (34.3) Signal Eastbound from I-581 NB Controlled(31.1)Controlled Peters Creek Road Diverge with off- B (11.4) B (12.7) B (12.7) B B (13.9) 13(13.9) Eastbound ramp to 1-581 SB (13.6) Peters Creek Road Diverge with off- B (20.0) C (20.7) B (18.3) C C (23.4) C (24.1) Westbound ramp to 1-581 NB (22.2) LOS (merging-. - density, 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site - Roanoke, VA 53 0 DAVENPORT 9.0 Summary and Conclusion The Wood Haven Site is a proposed development to be located on the southwest quadrant of 1-81 and 1-581 on the north side of SR Route 628 (Wood Haven Road) in Roanoke County, Virginia. One access point is proposed on Wood Haven Road approximately 900 feet west of Thirlane Road. While the specific users for this site are not known at this time, the types of uses will be restricted to limited industry, laboratories, research and development facilities, custom manufacturing and general office. For analysis purposes, this study assumed the development of 550,000 square feet of a combination of limited industrial, office space and research and development - which represents the maximum impact scenario for traffic generation. For example, while the potential exists for a manufacturing or industrial facility of up to 900,000 square feet, such a use would generate fewer trips than the 550,000 square feet of mixed uses upon which we have based our analysis. Based on ITE rates and equations, this development has a trip generation potential of 5,011 daily trips, with 732 trips in the AM peak hour and 689 trips in the PM peak hour. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The recommended improvements are summarized in Figure 9 and in Table 9.1. Peters Creek Road at Valleypointe Parkway and 1-581 NB Off -ramp There are already substantial delays and queues on Peters Creek Road at the intersection with Valleypointe Parkway. Both the Synchrol SimTraffic and the VISSIM analysis confirm this conclusion. The existing adverse conditions are mainly due to the high intersection volumes, which indicate a current need for road system improvements to handle existing traffic volumes and address existing safety issues. The proposed site development provides the opportunity to not only improve current conditions, but to provide for future site traffic. The intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway is located only 650 feet east of the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp onto Peters Creek Road eastbound. The traffic models and field observations indicated that there are safety issues, as well as congestion, at the merge area from 1-581 Northbound, This is due to the lack of an acceleration lane onto Peters Creek Road from the exit ramp, as well as the short distance to Valleypointe Parkway. Taking the additional site traffic into account, it is recommended that the 1-581 Northbound off -ramp at its intersection with eastbound Peters Creek Road be signalized. The westbound direction of Peters Creek Road does not need to be signalized since it is median --separated. This improvement would resolve the existing safety and weaving issues on Peters Creek Road by providing a protected, signalized phase during which traffic from 1-581 Northbound off -ramp can turn right and proceed towards the appropriate lane at the Valleypointe Parkway 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 54 DAVENPORT intersection. In order to signalize the off -ramp, its approach onto Peters Creek Road should be realigned to a location approximately 1,100 feet (center to center) from Valleypointe Parkway, with dual right turn lanes on the approach. These recommendations are shown in the conceptual plan in Exhibit B. The VISSIM and SimTraffic simulations indicate adequate queue storage along Peters Creek Road. At the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway, it is recommended that a second eastbound left turn lane on Peters Creek Road be provided, and that the lanes on southbound Valleypointe Parkway be reconfigured as two (2) right turn lanes and a combined left/through lane. These improvements will require geometric modifications to accommodate dual turning lanes, including the presence of truck traffic. A conceptual plan illustrating these improvements is shown in Exhibit B. Right turn overlap signals should also be provided on all approaches. Since this signal is part of a coordinated system on Peters Creek Road, modifications to timing will need to be coordinated within that system for optimal throughput. Wood Haven Road The site access on Wood Haven Road is proposed to be located approximately 900 feet west of Thirlane Road. Based on the VDOT Road Design manual, this access will warrant both a right turn and a left turn entry lane on Wood Haven Road. Separate left and right turn exit lanes from the site are also recommended to reduce delays exiting the site. Cove Road at Green Ridge Road The unsignalized intersection of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road is expected to operate at LOS E during the future build PM peak. To reduce delays on the stop - controlled southbound Green Ridge Road, a southbound left turn lane is recommended. Also, eastbound Cove Road warrants a left turn lane due to the volume of left turns, even in existing conditions without the addition of site traffic. A left turn lane is recommended in order to safely accommodate left turns at this intersection. These improvements, which are shown in the conceptual plan in Exhibit D, are expected to improve the level of service to LOS D during the PM peak, in addition to improving overall intersection safety. Conclusion In conclusion, this study has determined the potential traffic impacts of this development based on a maximum impact scenario for traffic generation. It has identified transportation improvements that will not only improve existing safety and capacity issues but also accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. With the recommended improvements in place, the traffic impacts of the proposed development can be accommodated while improving existing safety and congestion issues. 414118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 55 DAVENPORT 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 56 Recommendations Intersection Recommended Improvements Electric Road at Cove Road No improvements recommended • Provide eastbound left turn lane on Wood Haven Road with 100 Wood Haven Road at Site feet of storage and appropriate taper Access Provide westbound right turn lane on Wood Haven Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper , Provide separate left and right turn lanes exiting from the site Wood Haven Road at 0 Provide eastbound right turn lane on Wood Havers Road with Valleypointe Parkway 150 feet of storage and appropriate taper Green Ridge Road at Electric Road Optimize signal timing to accommodate future traffic Cove Road • Provide eastbound left turn lane on Cove Road with 100 feet of at Green Ridge Road storage and appropriate taper (see Exhibit C) Provide southbound left turn lane on Green Ridge Road with 100 feet of storage and appropriate to er Cove Road , Optimize signal timing and coordinate with Peters Creek Road at Peters Creek Road system timing Peters Creek Road No improvements recommended at ihirlane Road • Provide second eastbound left turn lane on Peters Creek Road with 400 feet of storage and appropriate taper Peters Creek Road 0 Reconfigure southbound approach to provide two (2) right turn at Valleypointe Parkway lanes and a combined left / through lane (see Exhibit B) . Provide right turn overlap phases on all approaches • Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals • Signalize off -ramp and eastbound Peters Creek Road. Westbound Peters Creek Road does not need to be signalized since it is median -separated. Peters Creek Road at 1-581 0 Realign 1-581 NB off -ramp to approach Peters Creek Road Northbound Off -ramp to approximately 1,100 feet (center to center) west of Valleypointe Eastbound Peters Creek Road Parkway and provide two (2) right turn lanes on 1-581 NB off - (see Exhibit B) ramp, with a minimum of 400 feet of storage on second right turn lane. • Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic signals Peters Creek Road at Wood a Optimize signal timing and coordinate with adjacent traffic Haven Road signals Peters Creek Road at North No improvements recommended Lake Drive Peters Creek Road at Northside No improvements recommended High School Road 4/4118 163045 Wood Haven Site — Roanoke, VA 56 4 fN,r of VIRGINIA,. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 South Broad Street STEPHEN C. BRiCH, P.E. Salem, VA 24153 COMMISSIONER April 20, 2018 Ms. Carolyn A. Howard Vice President/Regional Manager Draper Aden Associates 16003 Continental Boulevard South Chesterfield, VA 23834 RE: WVRIFA-Industrial Development Route 628 — Wood Haven Road Roanoke County Concurrence —Traffic Impact Analysis Ms. Howard: The traffic impact analysis for the above-mentioned development received by our office on April 4, 2018 has been reviewed and it appears that all applicable standards and specifications have been met as the Virginia Licensed Professional Engineer has acknowledged by signing and stamping the analysis. Please be aware this concurrence does not constitute approval of the required site plan for the development which would include entrance location/spacing, intersection sight distance, proposed drainage, etc. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you. Sincerely, idan . Blevins, P.E. Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use VDOT, Salem Residency ckb/ cc: Philip Thompson — Roanoke County cc: Mark Jamison, PE — Roanoke City www.Virginiadot.org We Keep Virginia Moving EXHIBIT F April 25, 2018 Ms. Carolyn A. Howard, Vice President/Regional Manager Draper Aden Associates 16003 Continental Boulevard South Chesterfield, VA 23834 Re: Wood Haven Traffic impact Analysis Ids, Howard: The City Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed the final revision of the Wood Haven TIA, dated April 4, 2018, and it seems that all findings and recommendations are applicable and approvable. However, the approval of this TIA does net constitute the City's approval on proposed geometric improvement design details for the development and the affected street network. The City reserves the right to request updating the TIA and adding additional improvements when the traffic condition has significant changes in the study area. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Thank You. ly, City Traffic Engineer Public Wanks- Transportation 1802 Courtland Road N.E. Roanoke, VA 24012 Phone (540) 853-2686 Fax (546) 853-1270 www.facebook.com/roanake.transportation EXHIBIT G W E S T E R N V I R G I N I A WATER AUTHORITY Engineering Services Availability # 18-137 April 23, 2018 Address: 7911 WOOD HAVEN RD,7627 WOOD HAVEN RD,762.9 WOOD Accounting Code: Roanoke County HAVEN RD,O WOOD HAVEN RD Card #:NONE Tax Map Number(s): 026.17 -01-03.00-0000,026.17-01-01.00-0000,026.18-01- 14.00-0000, 026.18-01-13.00-0000,026.17-01-02,00-0000 Contact: WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL INDUSTIRAL FACILITY AUTHORITY Prepared by: Mitch Eakin, Utiltiy Planner 540 283-2996 This letter has been generated without an approved plan. Based on the information that has been provided to the Western Virginia Water Authority, public water and sewer can be made available to this proposed parcel under certain conditions as outlined below. The design engineer is responsible to verify the water and sewer requirements for any development. All costs associated with the design and construction of the public water and sewer improvements required to serve this new parcel will be the responsibility of the owner/developer. A more detailed Availability Letter outlining specific fee's associated with connecting to the public water and sewer systems will be provided in conjunction with the site plan review process. WATER: Water can be provided to the Property by connection to the existing 12" public water main located in Wood Haven DR.. Hydraulic grade line of the existing 12" waterline in is HGL 1375, It is the owner/developers responsibility to ensure that the existing water system can provide the necessary flow and pressure required for the proposed development on this parcel. Depending on how Property is developed the internal water service could be either private or public, and this would be determined at the time of site plan approval - SEWER: Sewer can be provided to the Property by connection to the existing 8" public sanitary main located in Wood Haven Rd Depending on how Property is developed the sewer service could be either private or public, and this would be determined at the time of site plan approval. Public sewer will require a main line extension. Our Mission Is Clear 601 South Jefferson Street • Suite 300 • Roanoke VA 24011 540-853.5700 • www.westernvawater.©rg EXHIBIT H The Lewis Living Trust Article One Trust Creation Section 1.01 Parties to the Trust The date of this agreement is August 17, 2016. The parties to this agreement are Stafford C. Lewis, Sr. (the "Trustor") and Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Stafford C. Lewis, Jr. and Patricia A. Smith (collectively, the "Trustee"). Section 1.02 Identifying the Trust The Trust may be referred to as the Lewis Living Trust dated August 17, 2016. The formal name of this Trust is: "Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Stafford C. Lewis, Jr. and Patricia A. Smith, Trustees, or their successor in trust, of the Lewis Living Trust dated August 17, 2016, and any amendments thereto." Section 1.03 Grantor Trust Status I declare that this Trust is a Revocable Trust. By reserving the broad rights and powers set forth, I intend to qualify this Trust as a "Grantor Trust" under the applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code. The term "Grantor" shall have the same legal meaning as "Trustor", "Settlor'', or "Trustmaker" when referring to the maker of this trust. In accordance with federal law, this Trust is not required to have a separate tax identification number. The identification number of Trust assets is the social �. security number of the Trustm.aker, in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 301.6109--1(a)(2) and IRC Regulation 1.671-3 (a)(1). For purposes of income taxation, I am treated as the owner of this Trust because I have retained control of the assets transferred into the Trust under IRC Sections 674-677. Therefore, any income should be reported on a personal income tax return. In accordance with TRC Regulation 1.671-4, no additional Trust tax return is required_ Section 1.01 Transferring Property to the Trust Any person or entity may transfer property of any kind, nature and description to the Trust in any manner authorized by law. (a) References to the Trust For purposes of transferring property to the trust, or to identify the Trust in any beneficiary or pay -on -death designation, any description allowed by law referring to the Trust shall be effective. A description may be to either the name of the Trust or the name of at least one Trustee then serving. (b) Initial Funding of the Trust By executing this agreement, I hereby transfer, convey and assign to the Trustee $10.00 (TEN DOLLARS), receipt of which is acknowledged by signature of the Trustee, in addition to any property hereinafter titled in the name of the Trust. I authorize the Trustee to accept any property into this Trust that is permitted by law to be held in trust, wherever situated, whether personal or real, tangible or intangible, separate, joint or community, and to hold and administer such property in accordance with the terms of this Trust should such property be transferred into the name of this Trust. (c) Marital Property Agreement Controls If I have entered into or shall enter into any marital property agreement, the terms of that agreement shall control the characterization of property titled in the name of the trust. In the absence of such an agreement, property titled in the name of the Trust shall be governed by the terms of this agreement. Section 1.05 Powers Reserved by Me as Trustor While I am alive, I retain the powers set forth in this Section in addition to any powers that may be reserved by me in other provisions of this agreement_ 21. (a) Action on Behalf of the Trust During any period that I am serving as a Trustee or as a Co -Trustee, I play act for and conduct business on behalf of the Trust without the consent of any other Trustee or Co -Trustee. (b) Absolute Right to Amend, Restate or Revoke this Trust I shall have the absolute right, at any time and from time to time, to amend, restate, or revoke any term or provision of this agreement, or of any revocable Trust created under this agreement, in whole or in part. Any amendment, restatement, or revocation must be in a written instrument signed by ane and delivered to the Trustee during my lifetime. 1-2 Article Seven Trustee Powers Section 7.01 Introduction to Trustee Powers The Trustee of tliis Trust, or any Trust created hereunder, may exercise, without prior approval from any court, all powers conferred by this Trust Agreement and any other powers conferred by law, including, without limitation, those powers set forth under the common law or any fiduciary powers act, or other laws, of the State of Virginia, including Virginia Code Sections 64.2-105 and 64.2-778, as may be amended, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Trust Agreement. Each power conferred upon the Trustee by state or federal statutes shall be subject to any express limitations or contrary directions contained in this Trust Agreement. Pursuant to Section 64.2--1307 of the Code of Virginia, as may be amended, T hereby direct that any Trustee who shall administer property under the terms of this Trust shall not be required to file annual accounts with a court as otherwise required by Virginia law, provided that, the Trustee shall furnish such notices and information as may be required under that statute or other relevant provisions. A non -Virginia resident serving as Trustee is authorized to appoint a Substitute Trustee if required by law that a resident of Virginia is necessary to accomplish a legal function or purpose in a Virginia court or in the office of a Commissioner of Accounts in a Virginia municipality. The Trustee powers shall include, but not be limited to, those specific powers in the following sections. Section 7.02 Investment Powers If the Trust holds investments, the Trustee may invest in any type of investment that the Trustee determines is consistent with the investment goals and overall goals of the trust, taking into account the trust's overall investment portfolio. Accordingly, the Trustee may administer, invest and reinvest Trust property in stocks, bonds, securities, commodities, options, and all forms of real or personal property, both tangible and intangible, whether such property is located inside or outside the geographic borders of the United States of America or its possessions or territories. Without limiting the Trustee's investment authority in any way, 1 request that the Trustee exercise reasonable care and skill in selecting and retaining Trust investments. l request that the Trustee also consider the possible effects of inflation or deflation, changes in global and U.S. economic conditions, transaction expenses, and the need for liquidity in constructing the trust's investment portfolio. The Trustee may sell at public or private sale, transfer, exchange property for other property, or otherwise dispose of Trust property for such consideration and upon such terms and conditions as the Trustee deems advisable, including options of any duration for any such sales, exchanges, or 7-1 transfers. The Trustee nnay invest in investment companies, mutual funds, common Trust funds and like investments. The Trustee may purchase life, disability, medical, liability, long-term health care and other insurance on the behalf of and for the benefit of any Trust beneficiary. The Trustee may purchase annuities and like investments for any Trust beneficiary. The Trustee may enter into any contracts, and deliver deeds or other instruments as the Trustee deems appropriate to the purposes of the trust. Section 7.03 Banking Powers If the Trust holds bank accounts, the Trustee may establish bank accounts of all types in one or more banking institutions as the trustee may choose. The Trustee may open such accounts in the naive of the Trustee (with or without disclosing fiduciary capacity) or in the name of the trust. When an account is in the name of the trust, checks on that account, and authorized signatures need not disclose the fiduciary nature of the account or refer to any Trust or Trustee. An account from which frequent disbursements are made need not be an interest bearing account. The Trustee may authorize -withdrawal from an account by check, draft or other instrument or in any other manner. Section 7.04 Real Estate Powers If the Trust holds real estate, the Trustee may sell at public or private sale, purchase, exchange, lease, mortgage, manage, refinance, alter, improve and in general deal in and with real property in . such manner and on such terms and conditions as any person might do as owner of such real property, l specifically grant to the Trustee the power and authority to sell any and all real estate owned by the trust. The Trustee may grant or release easements in or over, subdivide, partition, develop, raze improvements or abandon, any real property. The Trustee may manage real estate in such manner as the Trustee deems best and shall have all other real estate powers requisite for such purpose. The Trustee may enter into leases and grant options to lease Trust property even though the term extends beyond the termination date of the trusts established under this agreement. For such purposes, the Trustee may enter into any contracts, covenants and warranty agreements as the Trustee deerrrs appropriate. Section 7.05 Securities, Brokerage and Margin Powers If the Trust holds securities, the Trustee may buy,- sell, trade, and deal in stocks, bonds, investment companies, mutual funds, common Trust funds, commodities, options and other securities of any kind and in any amount, including short sales. The Trustee may write or purchase call or put options, or other derivative securities. The Trustee may maintain n-jargin accounts with brokerage firms and 7-2 The undersigned certifies that this revocable living Trust correctly states the provisions under which the Trust property is to be administered and distributed by the Trustee. f low Staffor . Lewis, Sr., Tru or Stafford ". Lewis,Sr., Tnzs ee w Staffo `. Lewis, Jr., Trustee Gx�L— Atricia . A. Smith, Trustee STATE OF 'VIRGINIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on August 17, 2016 by Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., as Trustor and Stafford C. Lewis, Sr., Stafford C. Lewis, Jr., and Patricia A. Smith, as Trustees. [Seal] Deborah L. Hall Notary Public Notary Public - IDS 7638487 Commonwealth of VA My Com. Exps. Jan. 3i, Eo19 8-15 � WAIN r r v i I /^ } e � � 1 ♦ e r y r IMBED`, '�� ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Ordinance to appropriate funds in the amount of $208,917 from the Virginia Department of Social Services for the County of Roanoke Department of Social Services and add four new benefit programs specialist positions to the County's Classification and Pay Plan Joyce Earl Director of Social Services Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Appropriation of funding from the Virginia Department of Social Services to the County of Roanoke Department of Social Services in the amount of $208,917 for four (4) new benefit programs specialist positions to assist with increased case loads anticipated with Virginia's Medicaid expansion legislation. BACKGROUND: Virginia's governor recently signed legislation to expand Medicaid for up to 400,000 uninsured citizens in the Commonwealth. Additional administrative funding to assist with the increased volume of Medicaid applications was provided to local Social Services departments for the equivalent of approximately 300 new benefit programs specialist positions throughout the Commonwealth. Local allocations were determined using current funding versus current workloads and projected increases due to Medicaid expansion. The Commonwealth anticipates that Roanoke County and the City of Salem's share will be approximately 3,800 additional Medicaid clients for the department. Based on these additional clients, the County of Roanoke has received funding to support four (4) new benefit programs specialist positions. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: The Commonwealth is providing funding in the amount of $208,917 to the County of Roanoke in fiscal year 2018-2019 for additional local staff to determine eligibility and carry the on-going Medicaid cases. This equates to four (4) benefit programs specialist positions. Funding from the Commonwealth will cover the costs of all four (4) positions in fiscal year 2018-2019, therefore a local match will not be required for fiscal year 2018-2019. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no impact to the County in fiscal year 2018-2019. Beginning in fiscal year 2019-2020, Roanoke County will be required to pay the 16% match as required with all administrative positions. Of the 16% local match, the City of Salem pays one third of those position costs. The local cost for all four positions in fiscal year 2019-2020 is estimated to be $34,500, with the County of Roanoke paying approximately $23,100 and the City of Salem's paying approximately $11,400. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of first reading of an ordinance to appropriate $208,917 in additional funding from Virginia Department of Social Services to the County of Roanoke Department of Social Services and adding four (4) new full-time benefit programs specialist positions to the County's Classification and Pay Plan. Staff recommends scheduling second reading of the ordinance for July 24, 2018. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $208,917 FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND ADD FOUR NEW BENEFIT PROGRAMS SPECIALIST POSITIONS TO THE COUNTY'S CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN WHEREAS, recently enacted legislation signed by the Governor of Virginia has expanded funding for Medicaid services in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's share of this funding is $208,917 to support additional Benefit Programs Specialist positions; and WHEREAS, the appropriation of these funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia was not included in the County's fiscal year 2018-2019 approved budget ordinance; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance before they are expended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 2018, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $208,917 is hereby appropriated from revenue received from the Virginia Department of Social Services. 2. A total of four (4) full-time positions will be added to the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan. 3. This ordinance shall take effect on July 24, 2018. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: June 28, 2018 Ordinance amending Ordinance 0-082218-5, fiscal year 2018-2019 Operations Budget for Roanoke County Public Schools, to account for additional funding in the amount of $567,792 from the Commonwealth of Virginia Christopher R. Bever Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Amend Ordinance 0-082218-5, fiscal year 2018-2019 Operations Budget for Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) to account for additional funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia. BACKGROUND: On May 22, 2018, through Ordinance 0-082218-5, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted the fiscal year 2018-2019 RCPS Operations Budget. Subsequent to that adoption, the Commonwealth of Virginia General Assembly adopted its final changes to the fiscal years 2018-2020 biennial budget on May 30, 2018. On June 8, 2018, the Virginia Department of Education released the calculation tool for the final General Assembly budget allocations by school division. The state increased the funding for K-12 education from lottery funds, which resulted in $567,792 in additional revenue for RCPS. On June 12, 2018, the RCPS School Board approved revisions to the fiscal year 2018- 2019 RCPS Operations Budget to account for the additional revenue. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: This ordinance will amend the fiscal year 2018-2019 RCPS Operations Budget ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 22, 2018 to account for additional revenue allocated by the Commonwealth of Virginia to RCPS. The School Board allocated the additional funds into a contingency budget. This allows additional time for the School Board to revisit board spending priorities and the subsequent allocation of the additional funds during the summer. FISCAL IMPACT: The School Board General Fund Budget will increase by $567,792 for a total General Fund Budget of $147,326,299 for 2018-2019 as detailed in Attachment #1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of first reading of an ordinance amending Ordinance 0- 082218-5 to account for an additional appropriation of $567,792 from the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Roanoke County Public Schools and scheduling second reading of the ordinance for July 24, 2018. Page 2 of 2 1w �l�7m�71�7�7m��: I- Ln N I-- CO T LC) _0 N C= O N ' ' ' ' ' -0,— 0,_C= C: cu N N Q 0) Cfl Q O CO 0') cu i Q Q Ln T T N Ln CO 00 co Q Q C:O D Ln T T N Ln CO 00 00 LL CR � �_ CB C7 3 p ppNO L L o ti cl - ti Ln M Cfl O 00 N C N 'IT Q 0- O p 0 Cfl Q N O O U O Ln Ln 'IT wM W PL C^ Ln 1-- 0') T O m O Ln •E N R ffl Ln CoCD p Ga ffi 61). p i N O V M Ln N I- CO T I- I- N O � CA Ln N I- CO T O OV V 'IT rr N d m m CQ L d d Ln m �° CO N T T N Ln CO CO 00 o Ln N T T N Ln C7 O o0 Ln CO N T I� N 7N p cli N = LL O C6 C7 Um r� N co Cfl O 00 N co 'IT O ti N M CD O 00 N C7 C cn ti C'7 M T O T I,- a i N U O O ° U �0 co C:O D "- cB cn 0 I- Ln CO N 'IT r W Ln P- Ln (fl r T-: N It:i 0 Ln T Z N C: D LU T W L Cfl T T U -cu LL + Of Q �l�7m�71�7�7m��: I- Ln N I-- CO T LC) Il- N N ' ' ' ' ' N Il N O " T CO T Ln (fl 0) Cfl 0) C= O 'IT T Cl) T Ln CO 0') cu i Q CD Ln T T N Ln CO 00 co I-- C:O D Ln T T N Ln CO 00 00 LL I-- ti � C7 G ti � ti cl - ti Ln M Cfl O 00 N CD 'IT O O p Ln CO CD O 00 N Cfl 'IT N O O U O Ln Ln 'IT (14 Ln 1-- 0') T O Ln Ln Ki Vf ffl Ln Efl C}} ffi 61). K? M Ln N I- CO T I- I- I- T � CA Ln N I- CO T I� ti 'IT M " T M T Ln Ln m m Ln M T T Cl) T Ln Ln m Ln N T T N Ln CO CO 00 cn Ln N T T N Ln C7 CO o0 Ln CO N T I� N cli cli Cfl N T r, N i C6 C7 r� N co Cfl O 00 N co 'IT CO ti N M CD O 00 N C7 'IT cn ti C'7 M T O T I,- C7 i N U O O ° U CO M T O T I- co C:O D "- cB cn ti I- Ln CO N 'IT r 0 Ln P- Ln (fl r T-: N It:i r Ln T CO T C: D LU T T Cfl T T U -cu I� T �l�7m�71�7�7m��: I- Ln N I-- CO T LC) Il- N � Ln N I,- CO T LC) Il N O " T CO T Ln (fl 0) Cfl 0) C= O 'IT T Cl) T Ln CO 0') cu i Q CD Ln T T N Ln CO 00 co I-- C:O D Ln T T N Ln CO 00 00 LL I-- 00 N T I� N q7 Ln C7 G U CO 00 N T P- N ' Ln cl - CA Ln M Cfl O 00 N CD 'IT O O p Ln CO CD O 00 N Cfl 'IT N O O U O I- T O T I- � 'IT (14 1-- 0') T O [I - cu (D CO Ln CO N C7 r Ln CO Ln (fl r 1-: N C7 r Ln T CO T r I- T T CO r T I- T 6Q� 1 61911 619I ILII 613. 1 6c�lI 6c�lI ILII Co O N Co cn s= D U- LL 0) C= C= cn N U E cu i Q cn v O O C:O D +� CB cn Q O cn O U U) LL N 0 0) Fu c U CO CO cu O Q O - U - 0 U N � U_ O p c cn U CU Z CU S co H aO CO CO N O O U N i= CO N cu N L Co O N Co s= LL N U CO D cn cu L cn s= � o s= cu QL x m W O cn cn O U- _r_ U i= CO U) N E cu i cn co N i N U O O ° U C:O D "- cB cn co p CO i= N 0 N � _0 x CB U >+ C: CB 0) U CO C: D LU cu O O U -cu O + Of O c cn UD a) 0 Z m H -0 CO CO N L O O �+ CO 0 N Q x W Co O N Co AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-082218-5, FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 OPERATIONS BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TO ACCOUNT FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $567,792 FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted the fiscal year 2018-2019 Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) Operations Budget on May 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, subsequent to adoption by the Board of Supervisors, the Commonwealth of Virginia finalized its fiscal years 2018-2020 biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the final Commonwealth of Virginia biennial budget included an additional $567,792 in funding for the RCPS Operations Budget for fiscal year 2018-2019; and WHEREAS, the RCPS School Board amended the fiscal year 2018-2019 Operations Budget on June 12, 2018 to account for the additional revenue from the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance before they are expended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 2018, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That Ordinance 0-082218-5 is hereby amended to account for $567,792 in additional revenue received from the Commonwealth of Virginia. Page 1 of 2 2. That the Roanoke County Public Schools fiscal year 2018-2019 Operations Budget shall be amended as detailed in Attachment #1. 3. This ordinance shall take effect on July 24, 2018. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: June 28, 2018 Ordinance declaring surplus and authorizing sale of 2 parcels totaling .505 +/- acres of real estate located at 3319 and 3323 Westmoreland Dr., Cave Spring Magisterial District Ruth Ellen Kuhnel County Attorney APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Roanoke County desires to declare surplus and sell two properties on Westmoreland Drive for which the County has no public use. BACKGROUND: The County purchased two parcels of land in 1999 to facilitate an economic development project on Brambleton and Hwy 419. The project as then proposed (Home Depot) did not materialize at that location and the parcels were never used for the secondary entrance which was originally contemplated. Home Depot reimbursed Roanoke County for its acquisition expenses. There was an "agreement" for Roanoke County to pay Home Depot the proceeds of any sale. In 2013, County Attorney Paul Mahoney made overtures to the Home Depot's Corporate Offices by telephone call and certified mail and to date they have never responded to the County's effort to confirm that deal. It remains to be seen if Home Depot considers a legally enforceable agreement to be in place at this time. In 2013, staff initiated an effort to rezone the properties from R-1, Low Density Residential to C-2, General Commercial to conform to the zoning classification and use of these properties to the adjacent commercial properties and to better market them for sale by the County. The sites are designated as Neighborhood Conservation in the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan although a staff report supported the Page 1 of 2 rezoning to promote the orderly development of the adjacent Core parcels to more accurately reflect County development goals. The 2013 rezoning effort was halted by Roanoke County staff after conversations with neighborhood citizens and informal conversations with Planning Commission and Board Member representatives of the Cave Spring District. The parcels remain currently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential. DISCUSSION: Roanoke County has been maintaining the two parcels on Westmoreland Drive with County staff. This maintenance requires mowing and trash removal, which has become necessary due to illegal dumping activity. Adjacent property owners have periodically contacted County staff regarding future plans and after an internal review, staff concluded that no public purpose is served by keeping the parcels off the County tax rolls. The County has advertised for sealed bids in the Roanoke Times and communicated with the adjacent property owners. Depending on the level of interest and the amounts of the solicited bids, the proposed ordinance would sell the properties "as -is" with R-1 zoning. If the new owner wishes to engage in the rezoning process, then that owner can pursue that action after the conclusion of the sale. This County Attorney cannot find an actual board action previously declaring the property surplus so in an abundance of caution, staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors declare the property surplus in the ordinance to sell the property, if and when the Board makes that decision. FISCAL IMPACT: The parcels are assessed as follows 3319 Westmoreland Drive, .2585 acres @ $29,300; County paid $125,000 with building now demolished 3323 Westmoreland Drive, .2507 acres @ $29.300; County paid $150,000 with building now demolished STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has consulted with the various department heads and no public use is foreseen for these two parcels. The parcels are actually costing us resources to maintain at this time. This is the first reading of this ordinance; the second reading and public hearing scheduled for July 24, 2018. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 ORDINANCE DECLARING PARCELS LOCATED AT 3319 AND 3323 WESTMORELAND DRIVE IN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SURPLUS AND APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF THE PARCELS WHEREAS, Roanoke County purchased two parcels of land (Tax Map #77.13-5- 30 and #77.13-5.31) authorized by two separate ordinances Ordinance #101398-6 and Ordinance #090898-9 respectively for the public purpose of facilitating an economic development project which never materialized; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff has been maintaining the two parcels since 1999 without identifying a new public purpose; and WHEREAS, staff solicited bids from the public by advertisement in the Roanoke Times for two consecutive weeks for sealed bids to be received by 5:00 pm, June 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing will be held on July 24, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the two parcels identified as 3323 Westmoreland Drive, Tax Map No. 77.13-5-30 (0.251 acres) and 3319 Westmoreland Drive, Tax Map No. 77.13-5-31 (0.254 acres) are hereby declared surplus and serve no ongoing public purpose. Page 1 of 2 2. That County staff is authorized to sell these parcels for an amount of $XXX (to be disclosed at second reading) after review of the solicited sealed bids received after proper advertisement and public hearing. 3. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. Page 2of2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator All open district appointments BACKGROUND: 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District) The following District appointments remain open: Cave Spring Magisterial District Vinton Magisterial District Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (At -Large) One open appointment 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2017: a) Steve Anderson, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District is eligible for reappointment Page 1 of 2 3. Library Board (appointed by District) The following four-year term expired on December 31, 2016: a) Heather Lawrence, representing the Vinton Magisterial District 4. Planning Commission (appointed by District) Wayne Bower, representing the Hollins Magisterial District, four year term will expire on June 30, 2018. Supervisor Phil North has recommended the reappointment of Mr. Bower. Confirmation has been added to the Consent Agenda. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 28, 2018, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — April 24, 2018 2. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Jerrold T. Greene Jr., Police Officer IV, upon his retirement after nineteen (19) years of service 3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Allen Thompson, Business Systems Analyst III, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service 4. Confirmation of appointment to Roanoke County Planning Commission (District); Length of Service Awards Program (LOSAP/VIP)(At-Large) Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Jerrold T. Greene Jr., Police Officer IV, upon his retirement after nineteen (19) years of service Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Recognition of the retirement of Jerrold T. Greene Jr. BACKGROUND: Jerrold T. Greene Jr. retired on June 1, 2018, after nineteen years with Roanoke County's Police Department Mr. Greene is unable to attend today's meeting and his quilt and resolution will be mailed to his home. DISCUSSION: There is no discussion associated with this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO JERROLD T. GREENE, JR., POLICE OFFICER IV, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER NINETEEN (19) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Mr. Greene was employed by Roanoke County on July 1, 1984 and again on January 13, 2003; and WHEREAS, Mr. Greene retired on June 1, 2018, after a total of nineteen years and five months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County, first in the Sheriff's Office and later in the Police Department; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Greene's tenure with Roanoke County, he has served as a Uniform Patrol Officer, a Traffic Enforcement Unit Officer, and a Community Services Officer, rising through the ranks to reach the rank of Police Officer IV and has served with skill and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; WHEREAS, Mr. Greene was a valued employee throughout his tenure with Roanoke County. Mr. Greene served the community with passion and professionalism that have been recognized by his peers, supervisors, and by citizens who he had interacted with throughout his career. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to JERROLD T. GREENE JR. for more than nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Allen Thompson, Business Systems Analyst III, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Recognition of the retirement of Allen Thompson. BACKGROUND: Allen Thompson, Business Systems Analyst III, retired on June 1, 2018, after thirty- three years of service with Roanoke County's Communications and Information Technology Department. Mr. Thompson is unable to attend today's meeting and his quilt and resolution will be mailed to his home. DISCUSSION: There is no discussion associated with this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ALLEN THOMPSON, BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN THIRTY-THREE (33) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Mr. Thompson was employed by Roanoke County on October 15, 1984 on a full-time basis; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thompson retired on June 1, 2018, after thirty-three years and seven months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Thompson's tenure with the Information Technology Department, he has served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; WHEREAS, throughout Mr. Thompson's career with Roanoke County on the Communications and Information Technology Application Services team, he provided excellent support and development for the Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools Human Resources and Payroll systems, Roanoke County Schools SIS, SAS and Personnel Budgeting, Roanoke County Building Permits ACES and Land Development Office systems and Roanoke County Estimated Tax, State Tax and Business Licensing, across several development platforms and many applications and reporting tools; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thompson devoted many hours to conversion and testing for the Lawson Human Resources and Payroll environments and the HP to LDO, Budcon and Munis migrations and subsequent upgrades, supporting systems with challenging network, server and application complexity. His knowledge spanned from COBOL programming, through AS400 and Windows server applications, up to hosted and web applications in the Page 1 of 2 cloud. He performed his work with dedication, humor and focus, and provided expertise to newer co-workers on his supported applications and business areas. He will be missed by all of his team and co-workers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to G. ALLEN THOMPSON for more than thirty-three years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Confirmation of appointment to Roanoke County Planning Commission (District); Length of Service Awards Program (LOSAP/VI P)(At-Large) Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Confirmation of appointments BACKGROUND: Roanoke County Planning Commission (District) Wayne Bower's four-year term representing the Hollins Magisterial District will expire June 30, 2018. Length of Service Awards Program (LOSAP/VIP)(At-Larqe) Doug Adams and Jeff Edwards' term is due to expire on June 30, 2018. DISCUSSION: Roanoke County Planning Commission (District) Supervisor Phil North has recommended the reappointment of Wayne Bower to serve an additional four-year term to expire June 30, 2022. Page 1 of 2 Length of Service Awards Program (LOSAP/VIP) (At -Large) The LOSAPNIP Board of Trustees have recommended the reappointment of Doug Adams and Jeff Edwards to an additional four-year term to expire June 30, 2018. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Mr. Adams and Mr. Edwards. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this Board Report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of all appointments. Page 2 of 2 Q) .�d 0 c 0 � 0 � � � 0 U Q) � Q) Q) w 3 . v � c m � � Q) to c � 0 U � 0 m � u c m 2 -0 Q) m CL 0 CL CL 2 � 00 0 N P� 0 J_ 2 � MA LL rq rq cm cm o u 0 � A . 7 Ln 00 m cr m 0 ° c� % r- % g M c k � k E / § I m 2 u » )» n o . 2 » > k q 2 2 cm q % \ N r- o u Ln % § cm 0r- Rt Ln ecn CL2 M c % k 7 / \ e < CL : ) u % / / % \ 9 \ ^ � ^ \ LnLr� \ \ » § ° G z e ) k / C:\ / / 0 ) f & ) ƒ - r t 0 m 0 k 0 \ k \ \ $ \ e \\ e / g m I $ $ u / 7 % $ 7 -a _ \ E 00 2 q ) \ ) \ k rq 2 E \ \ m \ § \ & \ % ce ) / E � ƒ a E / \ & § e B % e4 - \ / \ / $ $ 2 \ \ \ \ N @ 0 & / N @ 0 & % / m 3 E J^ � COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Audited Outstanding June 30, 2017 Additions Deletions General Obligation Bonds $ 3,640,935 $ - $ 875,760 VPSA School Bonds 86,990,706 8,107,624 Lease Revenue Bonds 78,410,705 6,440,000 3,005,000 Outstanding June 28, 2018 $ 2,765,175 78,883,082 81,845,705 $ 169,042,346 $ 6,440,000 $ 11,988,384 - $ 163,493,962 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Thomas C. Gates County Administrator N e � C a) C C t0 c :s LU a ® te0 O ; Z O a CD U ® (D F it i LL ! ® LL ! ® m L •' t Z e ® E U W c C L � t t�0 (� 1 8. L U K' V C m m ®y 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Ln 4 r V n w V CO r n W n 00 m ItT w O N n M N LO N 7 C 0 r, M M a0 Lf) LO N m O m O7 M N O N M a0 N M N � r o 0 0 0 N W O W CO Lfi N n N O LO M M d7 d' O m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N w V V n w V CO r n W n 00 m ItT w O N n M N LO N CO r- CO d7 CO CO N r- 00 O 00 O co O N N M r O CO M M co O W Ci ® CO CO.4 M O M r M = O O 07 Ld CO r-� r-�' Lfi V Lfi CO V N CO r CO CO O CO 00 N M CO O N M L!') e� L!') N Lf) N N L1') r- 00 N LO O N rl M r- N CO m '31 O O Lf) N N N M O r M r n CO T V N V N LO m O co N N CO CO CO M M M CO N CSU CQU � O) N � Cl C r, M r r� M 00 CO M CO r M CO r rCN r r r r Efl N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O�_ 0 co� d7 d7 N N M 0 CO N ItT m(9 O M Lf•) r-0 r f•) d7 O r M LO , CO O O CO CO N C9 m CO m M N N ® N O V CO n CO CO 4 O 6 4 LO L6 M M 00 M 4 00 00 00 00 O r- 00 r- O r- r- r- 00 00 LO m m 00 00 Nr- � M M CO r, M w M O LOM CO N N CO M r, O r- ItT m W LO M w CO O m m O LO m CO C9 -'T N co r- N r- r� LO O CO CO LO m LO O d' M m M M r W r- Cl N M M O M r M = O O 07 Ld CO r-� r-�' Lfi V Lfi CO O N CO O7 ® CO O O -Iz O N O ItT r- co CO O M N CO r- r- M CO O CO M co O Lf) m N N Lf) r LO O -It r CO -It M r LO O r, N r M Cl M 00 CO M r M CO M CO r r r Efl a0 r O N O LO m O O O co m O N O O�_ O LO LO O O O CO O) O O m d' LO O O w O O LO N O O r- CO O O CO co O CO O f9 N O7 7 O O oc LQ O O CO O I® Lf) M O O M N m co O O d•�_ CO V M O O O M O CO V N � CO U 7 1:TN LO N n 00 00 00 N O 00 O = CO LO M W V r N LO 00 O r- O M r CO �T r- N CO N LO Lf) 1:11 CO N r d7 N M M r M O M CO N r r M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o r- V M 00 O 0) CO CO m m co N V 00 CO V m N r- LO 00 m r- 00 O lz� V N O O? M CO r Tr N M LO LO ItT O 00 CO r- N N m ItT O m N 00 Lf) .4 O N O 4 CO CO t\ rlz O CO O m ItT O U') O 00 00 00 O N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N n M LO L T M 1:T N ItT W co r, CO O LO 00 m N N m r, t\ CO � N r, N � m 00 LO O r, M N LO O N r,_ 00 = N r� 00N r- CO CO n oc CO Cfl 'T M N 00 d' CO O r n N CO N N CO CO 00 LO 00 N Lo N = N CO W r O7 r-�' O N Lfl CO Lf•) CO P V M O CO M LO M N r- r- U) r, CO O 3, O M Lf) N r- r- r 00 N M O N O LO r ® r CO r CO LO M r d' O r M r r 00 CO M ® M CO M CO r r r M Cl) N O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O ® O LO LO O V O O N O O O N O O O O O O O O O LO O O r, = O M r CO O CO O N O O O O O co CO O LO r- O O m 00 O CO N Iti O N 06 CO N M n O 06 L6 -�1 N -Iz M L6 06 U .11 O M LO 00 CO e•'� M LO _ d• LO LO M ItT 00 CO m W M r N N N ItI, 00 M M r M r- N M z3, z3, N M Lf) = CO O7 � N M N rM O M CO N r r -Izi Cl) U) N X LD H T N T) 4 _ N 3 O U m U ~ X N X ll 025 fn (n m U 0 X X N U H O LXO N H Q w p_ X Lc LO C .O E O LL H LL U 0 O LO ~ N X0 O N N T O m d m N O X U N C X U) J O p LL LL X U J L6 N N N cc O U U 025 O e U J ~ O N 5 � m O N tq N 'E N N tq O U m X O76 a U T Q N O O U J ~ LO U O w O U O E � C U> n U m LO m c 5, O E c c .Fn � 5 X Y 5 x� o E -CEO -Z5.2 -0 ~ ~ U J U m LL _ O Q J 0- LL U o 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 o 0 o 0 � 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $y Lf) m 00 M N O M 00 m co co (D U') 00 O r- O V c Co fo co co ® 1:T co O 00 (D O) 00 ItT r- N w Co O Co 80 r, M (Y) M o0 nr-1: r O CV O 6 N �2 O N4 O O6 L6 N N r r r r m M > 4Y ey i0 �) O co Lf') d7 M CO Lf) W Co O r� O N LO Lf ) LO = -It Co 00 00 N V O Lf) W r- r 00 (14 00 00 fic co cr Co Lf) r ItT co (D n O 00 r 00 O r r Lf) W (D U) M Cl) I� O 00 07 Cl) 07 r-� O Lri O Co M M r-� r r N (D 0) 3,r L W ItT r -r- NN co T T Y9 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 �_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ®y r, n v m 00 m 0 w O m m n co O 00 rItil 0 0 r r (D N m Ln O ? Lf) O co rl� N N (D O O ® 4 o0 co d7 O ® I� N o7 W o7 4 O Co o0 O 4 7 0) d7 W O m W r, co 00 r- O Lf) Co w r- r- m Lf) r r N co 00 0o O r- M O O O N 00 O O 00 M N r- N N O O gp ® r- P, O O ® Cl) 00 Co r- N o0 00 i f ) 3' O Qy N r r r N r- ® 00 Co O O Lf) i) O co V m 00 r, 7 M n rl 00 M N O N W O Lf) N 00 N r- O M N _ L) CO co co Lf) Lf ) ® m m � N _O � Co 00 _ Qy co co M T N N Cl V co if ) ? N O if ) CO M (Y) r r N r -Iz at � V ® O ® O O ® 00 O O 00 ItT co if ) N O if ) Co ItT O O LO O ® O O ® m O W 00 co co O w Co N m O Lf) LQ O N N r- (= n = r- Co U') O r 00 r- N O ar 49 -Iz U) CoO M M M ® M I� 00 Co N U 0) N O ® � n r- � M � Co -It Co M d' T N O _ Co N M r1i ItT O 00 O ItT r Lf) M N -Iz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ®y Cl) (") ItT co 00 Co N O n co O co U') Co if ) I, Co 00 O O r Co CR if ) I- rl� if ) co O ? if ) O O U% z3, I- N r r O O 7 M 00 00 N O ® O O O ® if ) (°)Cfl lf> O O Cl)7 r- rl r- Lf) co 00 co 00 r- O L f) � 00 r, 00 M I- n r- Lf) N r Lf) M LS') Lf) m O ® ItT r O 00 Lf) O N n N N r- O Cl) Lf) 00 Il � Lf) N m r- O r- Lf) 00 ` (b 00 Co r 00 N N O r r- N ItT O N CO 1:T M co 7 W M c°) O -Iz Lf) 00 07 O N ® r-� M M 07 O _ W Lf ) U') o) r- O co Lf ) ® ItT = I- (Y) O N 00 LO ItT Qy co M M co V V M 1:T N 00 Lf ) O M r r d' N r M O ® O O ® Lf ) Lf ) O ® -It Co m W O O Lf ) m O O O W O ® O O ® I, 00 CoM O U) O co V Co O co O ® O N N O r 00 Lf') Lf ) 00 00 O Lf ) N m O ar 49 L) O ® U5 Co N Co 00 (y M Lf> N M O) 00 O Lf) O 04 00 LO LO r - r r N r N Lf ) = M � M O r- m O r r Lf) M m U O E e > a) ® N co m 0-fo U JU O d U fn N Q (D wa) U U _ O O O N C U � a U °) U) U to ° oa m m o> o in in Q L v°') 0 ® a) Q U O LL - O (n Y 4 (0 N (0 N LL (0 U (0 U) Lo 0 0 in a v a o .� o O (n (n LL 4) m Q Q O O L��O d LL � j U m NN . a ( v m aau v o vU) Ui m v i CD o E Ho H m m u -r isi= fv fu -r- 0 0 w � 20� z U) O w 0 ®y I 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 00 c N O p A p ® p ® r i0 4Y cy _ 60 c9 O ® O ® W w c9 c a 04 C C) 0 o o co O ® O 00M r o ® co 00 � eco ®y C6 ap oo v -® ®0 N N Lq 04 N ey 0 0 0 0 0 49 co O ® O ® u'9 'A O ® O ® ? 7 o O ® O ® � d � 0w O ® O 00 rco N c9 r CL ix r O ® � LO 0 00 n r- n U'9 a+ co_ M � 'O 00 r N N N O 7 N 0) O U l0 U O N � N O e LL U O LL l0 co O U) O75 ) O �p C: O H p F- 0 H 0) @ U s0+ � c € Q U W W ca W 7 (0 t+ � CE Q U W W ca a a o - o a O) a o o a r o a o o a o (0 a o o a o a r O® N O O 1 W O M (ND O N <. r (D co r O (0 O O In O O) O O O r O V O N O O M 00 N O N cD (rj N O ® N r O co O O O Ln O O ® O O m O O N (0 00 M M N ® O V ^ CO ® N W N W W O V r ® O C O) O co L O r N O r 00 O N r O O O f00 LQ M M O P (0 r r W L m r M M LL V V O O c O) V) co N V O) In 0® N to v N ® N Ln CO O Cl) r O LO 0 00 r r .... O M co Ln O LO ® M N V .... � r O N O M C Z, r— Ln O N O O vi V P O O O IR o o o o o o a o 0 0 o a o o o o a o 0 0 V O N® r CO N r V co N N 00 V O M O 00 V O (0 r M O Cl? V r O) O N V r (0 M O CO N O 00 O 00 r O N Ln N O O) ® r Ln ® O O N (D Oj 00 LO N V LO O to O 00 r O (0 (0 00 O O O r 00 00 00 00 O r 00 00 00 O P O) 00 O) 00 m r O 00 P to ® V O) M M r N M (0 V O W N (0 (D N O O O to V O O O LO (D N LO O O O O V M (0 LO (0 O N (0 to @� r Cl) co O O) V LL9 Ln Ln ® O r O" LO 0) 00 V O M V M r O) W (D O) (D 00 00 N to 00 O O M V LO (D (D r CO N M m r M M r (D to O r (p O to (D O M O O Ln M O LO LO LO r N N W M P r O N O M M LO N Ln O N O O vi V P O O O C P r N r r r N M M Q U _ r r r F LO V r to O M In Ln ® ® LO r 00 In M M a1 (0 r V In W W L1) Lfl O V O W N (0 (D O O r 00 CO O W LO O O (D (0 O Ln O r O P Ln M O V N M V LO V N O O O Ln Lfl M a1 O 00 )a r Or LO r M ® (D r P LO 0) 00 LO r W L ® O W r to M V M 00 V 00 P W O tOD Ln P r 00 O P M M O) r O) O 00 co Ln M N In O) O V O) O) (0 ® Ln r Ln r O LO LO LO r N r P r r N T V P O 'N P @ V V N r vi O V O C to N M Q U _ v F O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 m C) coN O V LO M to (D cD L!) O V LO N_ O M O _O (D O O N N O Vn O) 00 P O) O 00 M O) 00 Vn O O O) O O O W O 00 r O 00 O r (D M N O LD Pj (D N CO M N O CO O 00 V O N O P r O 00 00 r 00 0® O) O) 0) 00 r 00 O) r O 00 O) 00 m O 00 O LO P M N (0 P (0 00 O) 00 ® V LO r V O O ® O V W O LO O 00 LO V M r (D LO N N (0 m (D M N W W (D M Ln M M O) M V N O Lf O) O O N Lfl Cl M N N 00 r O (0 C V O LO r N ® (D O) P LO 0) 00 M O 00 O) ® O O) r to M r M M (D 00 Lfl N O LO Ln M N 00 O P M M O) r O) M N (O co N V O) (0 M In N Ln (� V O N 00 O) LO V In In P O P r r N r r r O 'N M M @ V V r r In M O r O O 00 (D C'4 M M N M r (0 @) O (0 V W M O N 00 00 r 00 L) Cl) P M O) O co O 00 CO O to 00 O N C O W Ln M M V O _M LQ 00 r r (C (D (0 M O (O (0 CO (0 ® CO LO r N 00 (D O) O) V N Cl) O r (D LO M M O O M M N r 00 Ln M Ln N 00 r O O M r Cl) ® V (0 r (D 0) (D Ln O) V M O) N LO O 00 "O r r r N T V r O 'N O M @ V V N Q (D Cl) r C 0 C O - @ (0 02 C O C O C to != .£ N U N "O Q O 'N @ Q C C to N Q U _ v F O .� C U C Q cc @_ O 0% d CL oa C 01 U xi E N oa X Q W N O w @ -O E W 0) j 0) U @ to 0) 05 ca m C O 0 0 V O> 0) C O 0) L N N cc N 70 W N =) C N =) U D_ U •�+ to L U @ 0) 7 C m '.� @ NCL 0) a) O L 7 @ �_ O C 7 @ N @ C) N @ 7 N O O O 4) J O w 0 65 � J tL U Q d O T M w s o a. 2 a W U d W i l 00 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O ^ O r M P V P V 00 M O O P 't 00 Cl? to Ln fD V O O O O O O O O C® O r V M fD fb r M 0 g�0 00 NLCCD) M N M N Cry co M M 00 O O O O N P r r N 0 r_ O f0 M ® O M o1 O fp C r V W O O O 00 M P P 00 OW try NWN V r 1 rO O eIqD tClV > N 00 IDD fOvD � OM r r 06 P N r r ® r M r 0) m v .NP... v V `-' N M P O 00 V r Q V r Ln P Q o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o a o o E P Ln CD O O V O N co q O 00 to W V LO m O O M O O O O O O L[) 00 P co P Lon- 0) N O O 00 00 T 00 00 fco 00 m 000 V . M m to L OO O O N 00 m 00 r, C W � m F � w CL o W to O O O P (M m O V 00 O O LO P V 00 O V O T 00 O O O O00 0N0 r N V P N O O O Q N 00 P O O P O M C g`0 fD C O) V 0 LO 00 O O N V N W ® O O O V O N M V) LO 0S'll 00 00 7 @ V � LO r Cl) L6 00 r ® P P M M co @00 CL C 7 U W W P N V O LO ® M to P O P O LO N N O O M O O O O O O O O P0 P 00 co O to 00 00 M N M M 0i P O M_ V Cp O O M O O LO O O O N _ Ln O N P CD P W P (y N 00 P LO 00 OO_ LO O M P 00 Ln T P t w Cl O � O LO P M L 00 r (Q to C® O r Ln N V O r Q N W NV co LO 0 m N a o o o o a o 0 0 o a o 0 o o o a E P O O O O to P LO O M r N r N P P M 00 fD Cl) O LO P O O O O O O O LO P Ln to P Ln C® a 00 7 C .a N m V 00 M m P 00 N O V0) LO 00 O O) O 00 LO P fD LO Cl) O O fD O V O 0 N O P V0 m � 00 P W m d 0 o W N O O M Cl) O 00 O N LO 00 P V P <D O N 0 N P N LO Ln P O O O O O 7 co LO 7 M N P a) O Lp r O r ® N V O O P O O C Ln @ O O a) r- 00 LLL) O V LMO O N 00 M N LO M co m O ( M Y @ O V � O V In V P N M O N } C m E N M L6 P d N r, N L6 O P LO O CL r d W W oa M Cl) N O O N fD P P O O O O M 00 O O O N Ln O O fD P M 00 M 00 M M O LO M fD 00 00 O N 00 O 00 V Ln M O N 00 N LO h N Ln N Ln V O Cl) 00 0 M LO O P 00 O O 0 W Ln P Ln N V LO N P V O V LO 0) co I, O 00 00 M O N O m lO P O N 00 r LO O P O O 7 N O Q r N M 00 m N N C O .@ N cc @ 01 O Q Q- L`0 0) a @ 7 a c a1 @ a> U U a c U ai E E E o @ _ W o v @ > O > O c O E C O � C 9 Q O 75 2 0 > � a @ T >, C C m m C N a) N a) N W a>i ® @ N S� a� m m m en a) C LU U @ > m U O '- 21` E CO a) a) m a) W C U Q C_0 F F ® :4 N W L7) O9 7 E T O @ a) D U N "O o CL 0 7 a 7 w F N (O 9 7 @ _@ O O O o CE O O O. E X O to X @ 7 - N O @ C O Pin ILJ U d d 0 W 0 0 W 0 2 F T m Dc E F C:3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: June 28, 2018 Accounts Paid -May 2018 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 05/04/18 Payroll 05/18/18 Manual Checks Grand Total Direct Deposit Checks 1,411,646.72 1,419,783.60 Total $ - $ 8,440,888.17 41,005.37 1,452,652.09 50,765.42 1,470,549.02 8,733.16 8,733.16 $ 11,372,822.44 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Work session to update the Board of Supervisors on the strategic direction of Economic Development in the County of Roanoke Jill Loope Director of Economic Development Thomas C. Gates County Administrator This time has been set aside to discuss with the Board of Supervisors the strategic direction of Economic Development in Roanoke County. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Work session to update the Board of Supervisors on the May 27, 2018, storm damage and response Richard Caywood Assistant County Administrator Thomas C. Gates County Administrator This time has been put aside to update the Board of Supervisors on the May 27, 2018, storm damage and response. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 0.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 Resolution waiving Building Permit Fees for citizens affected by weather events of May 27, 2018 Tarek Moneir Acting Director of Development Services Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Recommendation to approve a resolution waiving Building Permit Fees for citizens affected by weather event of May 27, 2018 BACKGROUND: Roanoke County citizens suffered extensive damage to their homes and properties as a result of an extraordinary weather event and flooding on May 27, 2018. The storm was an extreme and unusually intense event; over seven and one-half inches of rain fell in about three hours, primarily in the southern portions of the County, causing extensive damages to properties within the County. As a result, many County homeowners were affected and, in some cases, extensive repairs may be required. Title 34 of the Code of Virginia vests authority in the County to inspect and issue construction, demolition and other permits governing structures and allows, but does not mandate, that fees be charged for such permits. In addition, Chapter Seven of the County Code sets forth the requirements for various construction and demolition permits and mandates that such building permit fees be paid and sets forth a schedule of fees. Roanoke County recognizes that there is a vested public safety interest in ensuring that all repairs, construction and/or demolition of structures that sustained weather-related damage from the events of May 27, 2018, be performed in compliance with the Building Page 1 of 2 Code requirements. Furthermore, Roanoke County recognizes that such repairs, construction, and/or demolition following this extraordinary weather event may compound the financial burden on citizens who must have suffered property losses. Staff has considered how to balance the public safety interest of insuring Building -Code compliance work while minimizing additional financial burdens on citizens negatively affected by the storm. As a result, staff proposes the Board of Supervisors consider waiving building and/or demolition permit fees for citizens affected by this weather event. DISCUSSION: The staff recommends to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that; 1. All building and/or demolition permit fees, as established and set forth in Chapter 7 of the County Code, are hereby waived for citizens whose property in Roanoke County was affected by the weather event of May 27, 2018 ; and 2. This waiver shall be in effect from May 29, 2018 until August 31, 2018; and 3. Any citizens who have already applied and paid for building and/or demolition permits for weather-related damage shall be issued a refund of such fees. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional funding required. The impact of the General Fund is expected to be minimal. Last year, County collected a total of $30,031 in fees including all alteration and renovation permits. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approving the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 RESOLUTION WAIVING BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR CITIZENS AFFECTED BY WEATHER EVENTS OF MAY 27, 2018 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that County citizens suffered extensive damage to their homes and property as a result of extraordinary weather events and flooding on May 27, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that many affected homeowners will need to conduct extensive repairs and/or demolition of homes and other structures following flooding and related damages; and WHEREAS, Title 34 of the Code of Virginia vests authority in the County to inspect and issue construction, demolition and other permits governing structures and allows but does not mandate that fees be charged for such permits; and WHEREAS, Chapter Seven of the County Code sets forth the requirements for various construction and demolition permits and mandates that such building permit fees be paid and sets forth a schedule of fees; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that there is a vested public safety interest in ensuring that all repair, construction /or demolition of structures that sustained weather-related damage from the events of May 27, 2018 be performed in a workmanlike, Building -Code compliant manner; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that such repair, construction, and/or demolition following the extraordinary weather event of May 27, 2018 may impose an undue financial burden on citizens and wishes to balance the public safety Page 1 of 2 interest of ensuring Building -Code compliant work with mitigating the financial burdens on citizens, and wishes to take steps to waive building and/or demolition permit fees for citizens affected by the weather events of May 27, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows; 1. That all building and/or demolition permit fees, as established and set forth in Chapter 7 of the County Code, are hereby waived for citizens whose property in Roanoke County was affected by the weather event of May 27, 2018 ; and 2. That this waiver shall be in effect from May 29, 2018 until August 31, 2018; and 3. That any citizens who have already applied and paid for building and/or demolition permits for weather related damage shall be issued a refund of such fees. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: June 28, 2018 The petition of Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. to rezone approximately 2.1256 acres from C -2C, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial, District, to remove proffered conditions, and to obtain a special use permit for a mini -warehouse facility, located at 5881 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances on an application to rezone property from commercial to industrial, remove proffered conditions, and obtain a special use permit for a mini -warehouse facility. BACKGROUND: Virginia Varsity Storage is the contract purchaser of approximately 2.13 acres of adjacent land to its existing mini -warehouse facility on Starkey Road from Monroe Gardens LLC (Greenbrier Nursery). Virginia Varsity Storage is requesting to rezone this property from C -2C to 1-1, remove proffered conditions from a 1988 rezoning, and obtain a special use permit for mini -warehouse facility to expand its existing facility. Mini -warehouse requires a special use permit in the 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District. Most of the property is located in the 100 -year floodplain and is adjacent to the floodway. Development is allowed in the 100 -year floodplain but not the floodway. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on June 5, 2018. No citizens spoke during the public hearing. Staff and the applicant clarified that there would be no fill placed in the floodway, that the fill in the floodplain would not increase the flood elevation by more than a foot, and that if approved, construction for the expansion would take place this Fall. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning from C -2C to 1-1, removal of the proffered conditions, and approval of the special use permit for a mini - warehouse facility with the following condition: 1. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled "Rezoning and Special Use Permit Conceptual Plan" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. and dated April 4, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to rezone the property from C2 -C to 1-1, remove the proffered conditions, and obtain a special use permit for a mini -warehouse facility. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Virginia Varsity Storage Request: Rezone approximately 2.13 acres from C -2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions, to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, remove proffered conditions, and obtain a Special Use Permit for a mini -warehouse facility Location: 5881 Starkey Road Magisterial District: Cave Spring Suggested SUP 1. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled Conditions: "Rezoning and Special Use Permit Conceptual Plan" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. and dated April 4, 2018. Existing Proffered 1. That the B-2 permitted uses for this portion of the property will be restricted to Conditions (to be those as currently stated in the current Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Section removed): 21-23-2-A; (1), (2), (4), (6) but only for Bowling Centers, (7), and (10) but for Clinic only. 2. That the access points onto Starkey Road excluding any industrial access roadway be limited to a maximum of three (3) such accesses. 3. That the projected parking areas be aesthetically treated with landscaping and/or planting areas. 4. That all dumpsters will be screened. 5. That the maximum light pole height will be thirty feet (30') and directed inward onto the parking areas and that the maximum light levels at the property lines adjacent to residential property will not exceed one (1) foot candle. 6. That there will be no billboards or similar outdoor advertising. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Virginia Varsity Storage currently runs a mini -warehouse facility on an approximately 5.4 acre site located at 5881 Starkey Road. Monroe Gardens LLC owns a 7.69 acre parcel adjacent to Virginia Varsity Storage where Greenbrier Nurseries runs a garden center. Virginia Varsity Storage is the contract purchaser of approximately 2.13 acres of land from the adjacent Monroe Gardens LLC parcel. Virginia Varsity Storage is requesting to rezone approximately 2.13 acres from C -2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions, to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, remove proffered conditions, and obtain a Special Use Permit for a mini -warehouse. If approved, the 2.13 acres will be combined with the existing 5.4 acre parcel. The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of these 2.13 acres is Principal Industrial. Principal Industrial is a future land use area where various types of industry are encouraged to locate and are convenient to major residential areas and suitable road access. The mini -warehouse use is an appropriate use for the Principal Industrial land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Mini -warehouse requires a special use permit in the 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District. In addition, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains use and design standards (listed below) for a mini -warehouse. Sec. 30-85-19. Mini -warehouse. (A) General standards: The minimum lot size shall be two (2) acres. 2. The minimum front yard setback shall be thirty-five (35) feet. 3. No security fencing, security gate or other obstruction to vehicle access shall be permitted in the required front yard setback or in any buffer yard required pursuant to Section 30-92 4. All interior driveways shall be at least twenty-six (26) feet wide when cubicles open onto one (1) side only and at least thirty (30) feet wide when cubicles open onto both sides to accommodate loading and unloading at individual cubicles. Adequate turning radiuses shall be provided, where appropriate, for a thirty-foot long single unit truck or moving van. Materials and design shall otherwise conform to the standards contained in section 30-91-4.3, parking area surface standards. 5. No door openings for any cubicle shall be constructed facing any residentially zoned property. 6. The following uses shall be prohibited: Auctions by tenants, commercial wholesale or retail sales, or miscellaneous or garage sales. The servicing, repair or fabrication of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, appliances or other similar equipment. C. The operation of power tools, spray -painting equipment, table saws, lathes, compressors, welding equipment, kilns, or other similar equipment. The establishment of a transfer and storage business. The storage of flammable, highly combustible, explosive or hazardous materials shall be prohibited. 7. Outdoor storage areas shall be used for the storage of motor vehicles, trailers, and recreational vehicles only. All outdoor storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties by a ten -foot landscaped area consisting of small evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs in accordance with Section 30-92 8. Accommodations for a live-in manager shall be permitted. Most of the property is located in the 100 -year floodplain. Section 30-74 Floodplain Overlay District (attached) regulates development in the 100 -year floodplain. If approved, site plan review and building plan review will be required. 2 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — In 1988, this parcel underwent a rezoning from M-2, Manufacturing District to B -2C, Business district with conditions for the purpose of constructing a shopping/retail center (see attached Ordinance 688- 6 for additional information.) In 1998, Virginia Varsity Storage rezoned the back portion of the site to WC (and removed existing conditions associated with the B2 rezoning) and obtained an SUP for the purpose of constructing a mini -warehouse facility with one condition. This condition was regarding the color of the buildings and doors. (Please see attached Ordinance 090898-10.) This portion of the property was then subdivided off to create tax map #087.18-02-24.02-0000. Topography/Vegetation — The front portion of this site -not being considered for this rezoning -fronts onto Starkey Road and is fully developed by Greenbrier Nursery. The rear 2.13 acres are an undeveloped growing area for the nursery. This portion of the site is mostly encompassed by the floodplain (see attached floodplain map). Surrounding Neighborhood —To the north, this parcel is bounded by the existing Virginia Varsity Storage mini -warehouse facility that is zoned I -1S, Low Intensity Industrial District with a Special Use Permit. To the east are single family residences which front onto Crescent Boulevard and are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. To the west is Rockydale Quarry, which is zoned 1-2, High Intensity Industrial District. Greenbrier Nursery is located to the south and is zoned C -2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The proposed layout consists of two new buildings of 23,000 sq. ft. and 25,200 sq. ft. The buildings will be similar in style and color to the existing mini -warehouse facility. Fencing would be installed along the outside property lines (note that some of the existing fencing would be removed if this application is approved). Five to six additional parking spaces would be added as well. The security gate along the access road to the existing mini -warehouse would also be relocated it the application is approved. Development of the site would require fill to be placed in the floodplain. A preliminary study has already been conducted and submitted as a part of this application. A more detailed flood study may be required during the site plan review process. Access/Traffic Circulation — Access would be provided along the existing access road from Starkey Road to the existing mini -warehouse. VDOT had no comments on the petition. Screening & Buffering —A Type D buffer is required along the adjacent residential property lines and a Type B buffer is required adjacent to the existing C -2C property. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of the 2.13 acre subject parcel is Principal Industrial. Principal Industrial are future land use areas that are appropriate for conventional industrial uses. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The mini -warehouse use is consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation. 3 STAFF CONCLUSIONS Virginia Varsity Storage has been in business at their current location for 20 years and now seek to expand their operation into a currently vacant 2.13 acre portion of the neighboring parcel. The use is consistent with the industrial nature of the surrounding area which includes an adjacent major quarry operation. The only potential impact of this development could be on the adjoining residential properties or from the development in the floodplain. Impact on the neighboring residential can be mitigated through the required buffer yards. The potential flood impact risk has been preliminarily assessed. Further study may be required before any site plan or building plan approvals can be given. The proposed rezoning and Special Use Permit is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Principal Industrial land use designation. CASE NUMBER: 4-612018 PREPARED BY: Tara Pattisall HEARING DATES: PC: 615118 BOS: 6128118 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Aerial Photograph Floodplain Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map 1-1 Zoning District Standards Floodplain Overlay District Standards Ordinance 688-6 Ordinance 090898-10 M County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776.7155 ALL APPLICANTS For Staff Use Onl Date receiv : ReceS ed by: l3 i(6 Application fee: PCIBZA date: Placards issued: I BOS date: Case Number Ll " Check type of application filed (check all that apply) X Rezoning X Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants namc/address w/zip John Lugar, President Phone: 982-2202 Virginia Varsity Storage Work: Apperson Drive Cell #: 915-3086 Salem, VA 24153 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Same as Applicant Work: Proffers, if applic Fax No. #: Property Location 5881 Starkey Road Tax Map No.: 087.18-02-24.00-0000 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 2.1256 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning area: Existing Zoning: C2C Existing Land use: Garden Center REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15,2-22.12) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: lis Proposed Land use: Mini -warehouse (expansion of existing facility) Does the parcel mect the minimum lot area, width, and.frontage requirements of the requested district? YesX No I I IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No X VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (WWIAA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordir Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA RISRV/CP V/AA RIS/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applic Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with. the knowledge and consent f the owner. Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Virginia Varsity Storage The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare, Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant will expand an existing facility in the adjoining 1-1 district following a successful rezoning. The subject property is not well suited for residential, commercial or other industrial uses, other than its current use. The mini -warehouse use provides a low -intensity transition between the 1-2 district to the west and the residential district to the east. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The subject property is designated as being in the "Core" future land use area, anticipating high-intensity urban development. It is immediately adjacent to areas designated as Principal Industrial, which is the designation of the existing Virginia Varsity Storage parcel. The proposed rezoning and development are consistent with the Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the suzTounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. A portion of the subject property will be filled to allow new construction to be completed above the base flood elevation and to match the grade of the existing Virginia Varsity Storage facility. The mini -warehouse use will not add any appreciable demands to the public water or sewer facilities, will have no impact on community facilities, and no additional or unique impacts on public services. The subject property is internal to the existing Virginia Varsity Storage property, so that impacts to adjoiners will be limited to the visibility of new structures. A type 'D' buffer is required adjacent to the development. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS V a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties c/ e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. +/ f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties V g. All property lines and easements ✓ h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ✓ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development I-*' j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS v' k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site ✓ I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers 1C m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants ✓ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. q 2 d$ Si jre of appli Dat in vuor-rezoning-eon-rezoning empu 7€9-0--13-W ,� ifah ,3i1i�.. €fk •I�.f�i f(m lit TAX P7,18 -02-15.W 1�1,.�R.1 �/ Iv iA7.19�132�tE.€� zw,03: R1 € X12 i)t ��� 611VIRGINIA" Ol! I���s .. 7 I Zffiffl; R1 EXPANSION 71A ; .21255 ACRES TO BE \ �� REZONED & GRANTED Sf'EgAL USE PERMIT Kv � °rte•, "'�;��'_'-e-_, , 1�\\TAX- � 1r1X �417.fFi Ll)-23,(lt) six 2t, -AR . Tri0« rArY €3 RI.I BRIER NURSERIES � ��� (BACK C�aEriK� `� :.�: REZONING and, » €R X37.%1" Q 2,i# 31H 3J 116 (R N1(i s . SPECIAL USE PERMIT rr :�s: Ric p� � �� 150' 0 150' CONCEPTUAL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 150' T 1 r.aa Virginia Varsity Storage DATE: April 4, 2018 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. SCALE: ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS COMM. NO,: ROANOIE, VIRGINIA 17-057 4664 BRAMBLETON AVENUE PHONE {540) 774-4431 P.O. BOX 20669 FAX: (540) 772-9445 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 E-MAIL: MAIL@LUMSDENPC.COM e;\lapo\auteaad\drawings\2017\17057 \eng\17057-rezoning-edit,dwg fti A& Community Development i n Planning & Zoning Division fR 8 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING 'Comm ISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date. April 49, 2005 V �`r ; �+tti �acSE fa -9ia+t Name of PetiticWs '�6" 0 - —L ,, Nl Petitioner' 9 at re q ?- 1 Dat Adjoining Property Owners - , ..er ty Address Ii +.. 5925 Starkey Road 2343 Highland Farm Road NW 87-18-02-24.01 Rockydale Quarries Corp. Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24017 5903 Starkey Road 55 Harbour View Circle 97.06-01-01.00 SLL Southwest LLC Roanoke, VA 24018 Penhook, VA 24137 Stacy T. Steans 5907 Paddington Court 5907 Paddington Court 97.01-03-28.00 Maria C. Steans Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Scott James Crosby 5903 Paddington Court 5903 Paddington Court 97,01-03-29.00 Young I. Crosby Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Summerplace Property Owners 5802 Knightsbridge Drive 932 Paddington Court 97.01-03-30.00 Association, Inc. Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Ravi M. Anantaraman 5840 Starkey Road 3604 Meadowlark Road 97.01-01-05.02 Hutoxi K. Hathi Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 5777 Crescent Boulevard 5474 Crystal Creek Drive 87.18-02-23,00 Woods Property, LLC Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Erwin B. Richards 5753 Crescent Boulevard P.O. Box 20232 $7.18-02-22.00 Debra Richards Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Jason E. Walker 5739 Crescent Boulevard 5739 Crescent Boulevard 87.18-02-20.00 Melissa A. Buckner Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 0 Crescent Boulevard 11041 Clover Hili Road 87.18-02-18.fl0 Gordon Harald Sink Jr. Roanoke, VA 24018 Bent Mountain, VA 24059 5719 Crescent Boulevard 3521 Manassas Drive, S.W. 87.18-02-17.01 Steven A. Poff Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Stanley Living Trust 5717 Crescent Boulevard 7047 Penwood Drive $7.18-02-17,00 Kenneth H. Stanley, Trs. Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 5711 Crescent Boulevard 5711 Crescent Boulevard 87.18-02-16.00 Mark Algie Reynolds Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 5705 Crescent Boulevard 5705 Crescent Boulevard 87.18-02-15.00 Melissa S. Kessler Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Thomas A. Garrett 5681 Crescent Boulevard 5681 Crescent Boulevard 87.18-02-14.00 Jore N. Cooper Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 W07'JJN305Wf1lQlIVIKlNW-3 fltWZ biklO}ilA'3XONV03 Y1K1mfue ,1x0mV0H3NON :awl 5496-ZCL (04s):Xv! 6990Z XO8'O'd S?1AlMC d'Id-uSkEhQ.�A21f1S�-TS�27I�i[AIT�JnfI3 csa-czoz 6144-4LL (045) 3NOHd M5'3f1N3Ab k0131gWSMfl 6994 Jd iS31 Y IJOSS-V tC1C1S �1111 8t0y g(�p1eW �3cva t Y so �� yQ�&5 �ggB g CS Of �z�Iq 4t S4yM � e� L3 d, f3 iuC R �` X08 � � � � '� F � � b � � V w 2 � � � � � F- zz LZL.( ro yYS`175 aE'r b�"5�.y0.a VIA z i MMU -02 wNh.rNW^VOi��" zE�.� 40. W o� �� 0.0. � a � � too 4 Q E RA �� R~ N � a UJ I -s S�ti 0 SIT i55pm Pt.IS WP X77 i Z v^ rd >; c� a �d+Pi a in �� b3 rel � r � � � r r n ' � �! P I li � 0161 its z RW lx x [01 � �juju asysR pla iitl'I 1664x-;Otl1L9011 d+wgi0diLSOlI\Ine\150[4\[IOL\60u3nwi0\'M IOM n E»ONVOU :3,YP8 woD'�dN3aswm0innv : Irow-3 a�usx v�rdlONin'3NouvoN dIN� 5VK-UL(Otis):XV3 699ozx0o'o-d SU3NNV'ld-S)IOAAM] IlS-SUTIN19NH no-LGoz -ON nnaa Ll6'6-6LL (045) !3NOHd Ms'3nN3nV No13lwvmQ b99L 'D'd 'SUVIDOSSV u2aSwrl'l 8 ere yUjimi5 :31Y6 i5 91. ! (A ti`d 1 � 1;' A ., iqS y+ rl Y L) $ ti M- F W 3R 3{iyW�' W 33:)3.3 z2h<'1NNhy W alesr4p 9t�34 4 }W� W W WyyW,,, yyW,,, 14 Z9 cq 91. ! (A ti`d 1 � y I yh ., y+ rl Y L) 1` OF10 ti N 1 P� z2h<'1NNhy ��� y•- 14 Z9 cq 91. ! (A ti`d 1 � y I yh ., y+ rl Y L) m ti X57 ,nH M—t�.. a 74 41 rf O S Y�m 4 q� Illfffjjj ����ID � i�Yl m jl6'Z 1ee46-{Qd116011 Q+KP7Qd1�50�,\��B\LSOlI\LtD2\BGu1MBlb\+M The following is a metes and bounds description of a 2.1255 Acre (92,587 Square Feet) portion of original Tract IIA (Tax Parcel 087.18-02-24.00), property of Monroe Gardens, L.L.C., to be conveyed to Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. and added to and combined with original Tract IIB (Tax Parcel 087.18-02- 24.02), property of Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc., in the creation of new Tracts IIA -1 & IIB -1. BEGINNING at Corner No. 8, an Iron Pin set at the northeasterly corner of Original Tract IIA, property of Monroe Gardens, L.L.C. (Deed Book 1563, Page .1762), common corner to Tract 1113, property of Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. (Deed Book 1595, Page 163) and as more particularly shown on preliminary subdivision plat by Lumsden Associates, P.C. dated March 16, 2018 entitled "Plat Showing the Re- subdivision of Tract IIA, 7.6961 Ac. (335,240 S.F.) (P.B. 21, PG. 82), Property of Monroe Gardens, L.L.C. (D.B. 1563, PG. 1762) And The Combination of Tract 1113, 5.3849 Ac. (234,565 S.F.) (P.B. 21, Pg. 82, Property of Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. (D.B. 1595, PG. 163), Creating Hereon New Tract IIA -1 (5.5705 Ac.) and Creating Hereon New Tract 1113-1 (7.5104 Ac.), Situated at 588.1 & 5889 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia". Thence leaving corner No. 8 and with the northerly common property line between said original Tracts IIA and 1113, S 77`39'54" W, a distance of 403.27' to an existing Iron Pin at Corner No. 9; Thence continuing with another common property line between the said Tracts with a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00', an arc length of 127.64', a tangent length of 64.80', a delta angle of 24°22'41", a chord bearing of S 10°05'42" E and a chord distance of 126.68' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "A". Thence with 6 new division lines through original Tract IIA the following courses; N 77"38'47" E, a distance of 33.76' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "B"; thence S 86°44'23" E, a distance of 36.13' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "C"; Thence S81°18'56" E, a distance of 316.56' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "D": Thence S 68"48'S2" E, a distance of 46.51' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "E"; Thence N 84°35'18" E, a distance of 46.92' to an Iron Pin Set at Corner "F"; Thence N 54°07'22" E, a distance of 74.53' to an Iron Pin Set along the easterly common property line between the aforesaid original tracts at Corner "G"; Thence with the easterly common property line between the original tracts, N 35"52'28" W, a distance of 274.22' to Corner No. 8, The Point of BEGINNING, containing 2.1255 Acres (92,587 Square Feet). Purchase Agreement' Exhibits Concept D', as prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 22, 2018, delineates the proposed acquisition by Virginia Varsity Storage, from Monroe Gardens, LLC. The acquisition property address is 5881 Starkey Road, SW; Roanoke, Virginia and the tax # is 87.18-02-24.00. The final acquisition area will be established by a plat of subdivision approved by the Roanoke County Subdivison Agent, and duly recorded by the Clerk of Court. Purchase parcel size: Sale price per acre: Total purchase price: Earnest Money Deposit (10%) 2.1.2 acres acre subject to final acreage 11MW be applied towards purchase of closing The agreement is subject to the approval of the aforementioned subdivision plat, as well as the following approvals and actions: 1. The completion of a boundary survey for that portion of the Monroe Gardens, LLC and Virginia Varsity Storage properties as is necessary to complete the subdivision plat, 2. The preparation of a flood analysis of the proposed fill necessary to complete the Virginia Varsity Storage expansion as depicted on Exhibit `Concept D', and the review and acceptance by Roanoke County staff of the results of the analysis. The proposed analysis will be limited to evaluation of the 100 -year flood elevation on the Greenbrier Nurseries property. 3. The successful removal of the existing proffered conditions on the acquisition area of the Monroe Gardens, LLC parcel, rezoning of the acquisition area from the C-2 to 1-1 zoning district, and the grant of the Special Use Permit necessary for the operation of a mini -warehouse, as currently exists on the Virginia Varsity Storage parcel. Virginia Varsity Storage will prepare the application and Monroe Gardens, LLC will grant Owner's consent to the petition. Virginia Varsity Storage or it's Agent wi11 make all necessary presentations to the Roanoke County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 4. Closing to occur within 5 business days of successful completion of Item 3. Roger Kronau of Covenant Real Estate Services (Salem, VA) will handle the closing. 5. Purchase to be completed by August 1, 2018. If pure ase is not consummated, earnest money deposit to be refunded to Buyer, Virginia Varsity Storage, In . -C. aZ .l6 j T Mdnroe Gardens, LLC, 5eW Date tZ TA Virginia Varsity Store, Inc.; Buyer Date ANALYSIS of FLOODPLAIN ENCROACHMENT FOR VIRGINIA VARSITY STORAGE STARKEY ROAD FACILITY CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PREPARED FOR VIRGINIA VARISTY STORAGE, INC. DATE: April 3, 2018 COMM. #2017-057 LLIMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE NUMBER PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS 7 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY 2 CONCLUSION 2 COMPARATIVE 'TABLES 3 CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR VIRGINIA VARSITY EXPANSION 4 HEC -RAS SCHEMATIC — GROSS -SECTIONS 5 HEC -RAS SUMMARY TABLE — EXISTING CONDITION 6 HEC -RAS SUMMARY TABLE -- PROPOSED CONDITION 7 FEMA FIRMETTE 8 FEMA SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES (Va1,1, pg. 15) 9 HEC -RAS CROSS-SECTION PLOTS — EXISTING CONDITION 10-16 HEC -RAS CROSS-SECTION PLOTS —PROPOSED CONDITION 17-23 PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS Virginia Varsity Storage (VVS) proposes to acquire a portion of the Greenbrier Nursery property in order to expand its facility. The land area to be combined with the VVS parcel is currently zoned C -2C and will require a rezoning to I -I to prevent split -zoning, and the Special Use permit that allows for the construction and operation of mini - warehouse units will need to be extended to cover the acquisition area as well. Roanoke County Community Development staff advised VVS that an analysis of the floodplain impacts would be required as a component of the Rezoning application to be considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The proposed fill associated with the VVS expansion is well outside of the delineated floodway of Back Creek Tributary B across this property, in an area where encroachment into the floodplain is permitted. This analysis is provided as a calculation of the potential increase in the 100 -year water surface elevation where proposed fill would be placed. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The analysis was performed using a combination of AutoCAD Civil 3D 2018 and HEC - RAS v.5.0.3 (Hydrologic Engineering Center, US Army Corps of Engineers). The eleven (11) channel sections were surveyed in early March of 2018. Those sections were prepared in AutoCAD, along with some preparatory HEC -RAS section formatting, using the AutoDesk River Tools (a HEC -RAS implementation within AutoCAD.) The model was exported for final preparation and processing in HEC -RAS. This area has been mapped and analyzed by FEMA in a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Roanoke County, Community Number 510I90, dated September 28, 2007. A copy of the current FIRMETTE (March 29, 2018) is included in this document. It is from this FIS that the Qtoo of 1,466 was obtained (FIS Volume I of 3, page I5). FEMA AutoCAD flood elevation mapping was also overlaid on the site base drawing in order to interpolate the FF,MA-calculated flood elevations at each of the eleven channel sections used in this analysis. The HEC -RAS model was calibrated for the existing conditions by adjusting the Manning's `n' factor for channel and overbank locations for each segment of the channel until the HEC -RAS WSEL was a close approximation of the FEMA interpolated flood elevations (refer to Comparative Table: FEMA flood elevations vs. HEC -RAS model elevations). A Steady-state analysis was then run on the HEC -RAS model for the existing conditions, the results of which are included in this analysis. A copy of the project geometry, profile and plan were made for the Proposed Conditions and the cross- section geometry was edited in HEC -RAS to reflect the proposed fill. A second steady- state analysis was then run to establish the proposed WSEL. HEC -RAS Cross-section summary tables are included in this document, and a summary table showing the differences between existing and proposed WSEL for each section is also included (refer to Comparative Table: Existing Condition WSEL vs. Proposed Condition WSEL). ANALYSIS SUMMARY The existing conditions were established by modelling the existing channel and performing a Steady Flow analysis in HEC -RAS. The proposed condition grading was modelled in HEC -RAS and a second Steady Flow analysis was performed. The fill proposed with the VVS expansion does raise the 100 -year flood elevation by a maximum of 0.54, well below the permissible increase of 1.0. CONCLUSION The fill proposed on the portion of Greenbrier Nursery property to be acquired by Virginia Varsity Storage will not raise the 100 -year floodplain more than one foot (1,0') and is permissible within the existing floodplain. The maximum calculated increase in the 100 -year WSEL is 0.54'. Comparative Table: FEMA flood elevations vs. HEC -RAS model elevations Channel Section Interpolated FEMA flood elevation HEC -RAS Existing conditions model WSEL Difference 1.000 1153.99 1153.84 -0.15' 900 1153.33 1153.35 +0.02' 800 1152.67 1152.52 -0.15' 700 1152.16 1152.26 +0.10' 600 1152.05 1152.01 -0.04' 500 1151.23 1151.03 -0.20' 400 1150.26 1150.20 -0.06' 300 1149.31 1148.61 -0.70' 200 l 148.00 1147.99 -0.01' 150 1147.39 1147.94 +0.55' 100 1146.56 1146.59 +0.03' Notes: Section 3+00 (300) is a significantly truncated section and could not be brought into greater conformance with the FEMA elevations without affecting the adjacent up- and down -stream sections which nearly match the FEMA elevations. Section 1+50 (15 0) could not be brought into greater conformance with the FEMA elevations without affecting the adjacent up- and down -stream sections which nearly match the FEMA elevations. Comparative Table: Existing Condition WSEL vs. Proposed Condition WSEL Channel Section Existing Condition WSEL Proposed Condition WSEL Difference 1000 1153.84 1154.38 +0.54' 900 1153.35 1153.75 +0.40' 800 1152.52 1152.69 +0.17' 700 1152.26 1152.50 +0.24' 600 1152.01 1152.29 +0.28' 500 1151.03 1151.17 +0.14' 400 I150.20 1150.30 +0.10' 300 1 11.48.61 1148.81 +0.20' 200 1147.99 1147.99 -- 1.501147.94 1147.92 -0.02' 100 1146.59 1146.59 -- iruo+-nuou sruay-rezoning oxmuir El 0 RampLm Ids e:\tape\autoesd\drawings\2017\17057\eng\17057-flood study.dwp l - — 300 1 L f---17 y -- _�, ITA ROAD > 500 600 — � 900 1000 800 100 150 .2{10 1— _— - .,�r� =:. rYr-'!_•�,4 FLOOD ANALYSIS -=-�� CONCEPTUAL PLAN 150' 0 150' ! Virginia Varsity Storage " = SCALE: 1 150' A SATE: March 26, 2018 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. SCALE:ENGI NEE RS -SURVEYORS --PLANNERS 1° = 150' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. NO„ 17-057 466413RAMBLETON AVENUE PHONE: (540) 774-4411 P.O_ BOX 20669 FAX: (540) 772-9445 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 E-MAIL: MAIL@LUMSDENPC.COM e:\tape\autoesd\drawings\2017\17057\eng\17057-flood study.dwp HEC -RAS SCHEMATIC -- CROSS-SECTIONS 1 m 300 1000 800 900 700 400 500 100 15 200 W-11AC Pian F21- n...bder Reach- 7 P.M.- EA.11.0 Reach River Sla Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vol Chnl Flow Asea Top Width Freude # Gbl (ers) (ft) (h) (6) (g) (ftffi) (I5) (sq ft) (ft) 1 4000 Eausling 1488,00 1147,75 1153.84 1152.34 1154.00 0.032773 3.98 506.84 564.63 0,37 1 906 Eodsling 1468,00 1147.35 1153.35 1150.63 4153.37 0,002530 1.49 1293,60 529.17 0,14 1 800 Usling 1466.0(1 1146.64 1152,52 1i52.85 0.111486 2.82 509.46 182.44 0.31 1 700 BdsUag 1466.60 1144.63 1152.26 1152.32 6.001065 2.5B 797.34 320.04 0.21 1 600 EAsiing 1466.00 1144.55 1152.01 1152.05 0.009290 2.05 1082,45 389,94 0,f6 1 590 Ebsling 1466.00 1143.39 1151.03 1148,89 1151,06 0.011150 1.65 1224.09 599.04 0.14 1 400 E)dsling - 1488,00 114334 1150.20 1148.02 1150.28 0.006016 2.74 1081.51 660.94 0.22 1 300 € 'sling 1466.00 1141.50 1146.61 1148.70 0.041802 3.23 768.58 256,88 0,26 I 200 Exisling 146fi.00 1141.53 1147.99 1145,94 1146.04 0,002828 2.31 1053.09 549.79 0.20 1 159 1EAsling 1466.00 1140.791 1141.941 1145.83 1146.01 0.000260 2.86 1071.74 647,11 0.21 1 100 t dsling 1466.00 1140.78 114659 1145.66 f147.84 0.139068 8,97 16330 41457 0.73 HEC -RAS Plan: Proposed River. Greenhrfer Reach: 1 Profile: Proaased Reach River Sla Profile q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crft W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope vel Chnl Flaw Area I Top Widlh Froude # Chi (Crs (o) (ft) (fl) (ft) (m (ftIs) {sq fl (ft) t 1000 Proposed 1468.00 1147.75 1154.38 1152.35 1154.49 0.018705 3.31 612.76 3049D G.29 1 - 900 Proposed 1466,00 1147.35 1153.75 1153.78 0.003768 1.89 10011,40 262.04 0.17 1 Soo - Pro used 1468.00 1146.64 1152.69 1152.81 0.091926 2,66 541.23 182.81 0.28 1 700 Proposed 1466.00 1144.63 1162.50 1152.56 0.000810 2.31 876.01 326.66 0,18 1 Boo - - Proposed 1466.00 1144.55 1162.29 1152.34 0.010058 2.21 928.67 284,94 0.17 1 590 Proposed 1466.00 1143.39 _ 1151.17 1148.97 1151.20 0.013175 1.841 1053.79 515A7 0.15 1 490 Proposed 1466.06 1143.54 1150,30 1148.01 1150.37 0.065778 2.72 7006.39 581.28 0.21 1 300 Proposed 1466.00 11 1140.89 0.039272 3.22 762.30 245.32 0.26 1 - 200 Proposed 1406.06��11"40.791147.92f 1145.87 1148,05 0.063811 2.66 813.38 436.20 0.24 i7- 150 Proposed 1466.061145.76 1148.02 0.000351 320 873.04 549.49 0.24 300 Proposed 1466.00 1145.66 1147.84 0,139066 8.97 163.50 414.87 0.73 m v . v%' N m a m `o v a� v m N_ c z a m e Eag m o kc�E a " m ° U Eov o ¢ K 2 3 3 m is m J c x¢ o a u°"1 c m n m .L- y m m a m s -am: •; o� m o v E aro u o M c a v m o o c t= 4 c c v N O E E o o 4 a .N rtct a a .—o a m, w O JCoN yaa •p`-. W4^L A'm,�. «$=+JO+ VE .E po3C8 moayEi aGo rnvm n} n am vm mc aa 0 yp vc LL,3c Cm qZd. o"° �v- a v v m a c m yr LO Ft a a aN LLtNpp G �� m y o m� a �� �,� w > a g to o S'' m 4 am 0w m daaEo LL m 1 _:° o oc v> i min Z _ LL v A N c I V G E 11I 3 0 3 � E a m a nE E h o 1• a { t[( �, o a m 1 eEa as � J � 91 y O m a C N ¢Y m ^ d] i9 O v J i N 0 E a c LL N z b m= m y 0 c' c v o� oaf g ¢w ww w °u o ESN tr cmz� va a U� �w w w �� z m,o m nay nu� �q wd y '° 5 w Y nui ai o F E c m= gIx ¢Q w m a t�� u t �' € w "mnn Eno w I N w p LL S F- L co N cz O O LL ca O 4-1m VA a a 0 0 CD >f� 0 a C 0 53 0 LO N TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES - continued FLOODING SOURCE DRAINAGE AREA PEAK DISCHARGES (efs) AND LOCATIONmites l6%.annus! chance 7%. anflual chance l_°� ann_ u4I cbAnCC 0Q1% annul cbance BACK CREEK (continued) Downstream of unnamed tributary, approximately 2,200 feet upstream of State Route 676 (Back Creek Road) 35.7 4,960 10,261 13,530 24,200 Upstream of unnamed tributary, approximately 2,200 feet upstream of State Route 676 (Back Creek Road) 31.9 4,547 9,432 12,435 22,336 At State Route 613 26.4 4,348 9,050 11,908 21,490 At State Route 688 20.4 3,884 8,119 10,652 19,261 Upstream of unnamed tributary at State Route 690 15.9 3,346 7,029 9,208 16,742 Downstream of unnamed tributary at U.S. Route 221 and State Route 692 14.5 3,179 6,691 8,759 15,952 Downstream of Little Back Creek 13.1 2,990 6,307 8,251 15,952 Upstream of Little Back Creek 11.1 2,733 5,782 7,555 13,830 Downstream of Martins Creek 7.1 1,935 4,138 5,404 10,060 Downstream of Martins Creek 6.0 1,821 3,904 5,087 9,471 Upstream of Martins Creek 4.2 1,383 2,989 3,893 7,347 Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of State Route 696 1.5 655 1,450 1,884 3,680 BACK CREEK TRIBUTARY A At confluence with Back Creek 3.5 980 2,136 2,798 5,416 Downstream of unnamed tributary near U.S. Route 220 and Indian Grove Road 1.2 476 1,062 1,385 2,765 At U.S. Route 220, near State Route 679 0.8 359 809 1,054 2,130 BACK CREEK TRIBUTARY B At confluence with Back Creek 2.6 848 1,848 2,418 4,709 At State Route 904 (Starkey Road) 1.3 505 1,124 1,466 2,919 15 HEC -RAS CROSS SECTION PLOTS EXISTING CONDITION HEC -RAS model Plan: Existing 4/212018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flour Profiles RS = 1000 2 LE 2 J 1170 1 Legend 5 EG Existing EG Proposed 1165 WS Proposed WS Existing .................--- Crit Existing 1160 ... .......,.._.-..-... Crit Proposed Ground 93 Ineff 1155 s .................. - .... Bank Sta _y 1150 1145 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 900 .1 11 -16 3 1164 Legend 1162 ............... EG Existing ---- -- ---4----------- EG Proposed 1160 WS Proposed WS Existing 1158 ..................... Crit Existing 1156 Crit Proposed G O ■ Ground 9154 Ineff Bank Sta 1152 1950 - . . 1148 1146 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 NO Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 600 1 �F .3 .35 1165 Legend EG Existing ...--.- -.A............ EG Proposed WS Proposed 1160 WS Existing s Ground Bank Sta c 1155 a3i w .................---.--------------- .-...-------------------- --.--.---.-.--.-1150 1150- 1145 1145 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plain: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 700 IE .05 .07 —.05-- 1160- 1160 Legend -------------- --------- -------------------- EG EG Existing 1158 -----------3 -- - EG Proposed a WS Proposed 1156 WS Existing 1154 t Ground Bank Sta 11152 n a� w 1150- 150114811461144 1148- 1146- 1144 0 100 200 30D 400 500 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan. Existing 4/2/21118 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 600 .25 �' .2 —.25 1160 Legend EG Existing 1158 .......... EG Proposed 1156 WS Proposed WS Existing r 1154 -Ground Bank Sta c 0 1152- 1148- 1146- 1144 152 114811461144 0 100 200 300 400 500 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Pian: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 500 .25— � .25.3� 1152ik Legend �•-•,, EG Existing EG Proposed WS Proposed WS Existing ......................... Crit Existing 1148 A, ... ........ Crit Proposed C p O Ground 7 � N LU Inefl 1146 N Bank St, 1144- 11421 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Station (ft) HEC-RAS model Plan: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom; Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flaw Profiles RS = 400 1158- .26 12 .2 Legend it EG Existing 1156- -- .A.......-- EG A1 -1. —EG Proposed 1154- WS Proposed WS Existing 1152 Cril Existing Crit Proposed ............................. . ........ ------ ---- ----- --- --- ---------- ............ --- —J?p Ground 1150- A Ineff 1148- Bank St, 1146- 1144- 1142 . .. . . . 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Station (ft) HEC-RAS model Plan: Existing 412/2018 Georn: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: I Flow Profiles RS = 300 4 4.25 IIIE .4 1149-, ............ ............ ....... .............. .............. ................... . ................ . . . . ........... Legend ...................... EG Existing 1148- ..... ........... EG Proposed 1147- WS Proposed WS Existing 1146- Ground Bank Sta 1145 W 1144- 1143- 1142- 1141 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1�0 1�0 261) 250 300 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 200 �F.08 .15 IE 11 z f6 '+-rr 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Pian: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 160 M 1140 0 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) .... .................... EG Existing ........... .A,........... EG Proposed Crit Existing Crit Proposed Ground A Ineff 16 Bank Sta -•------------------ -- EG - ----- EG Existing ... ........ A ------------ EG•---------- EG Proposed WS Proposed WS Existing Crit Existing ........... *........... Crit Proposed r Ground Ineff • Bank Sta HEC -RAS model Flan: Existing 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 100 .15 .15.15-- 1158 Legend 1156 -- ...... EG Existing EG Proposed 1.154 • WS Proposed 1152 WS Existing ----------- .......... Crit Existing 1150 ......... •+ -..- Crit Proposed 1148 __—__..__............................ .. ..... Ground Ei Ineff 1146 • Bank Sta 1144- 144114211401138 1142- 1140- 1138- 0 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) HEC -RAS CROSS SECTION PLOTS PROPOSED FILL CONDITION HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 1000 .2 2 1170 1 Legend 5 ........................ EG Proposed WS Proposed 1165- -- Crit Proposed Ground Ineff t, 1160 • Bank Ste G 0 a m W 1155- 15511501145 1150- 11451, 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Condifions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles 'RS = 900 .1-11 ,ifi- 'I 1164 Legend 1162i ............ EG Proposed WS Proposed 1160 ■ Ground • Bank Sta 1158- V- 1156- 0 1154 w 1152- 15211501148 1150- 1148- 1146- 11460 0100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan-, Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 800 1 3 - .35 1165 Legend ........................ EG Proposed WS Proposed ■ Ground 1i6D �1 Bank Sta x c 1155- w w 1150- 15011450 11450 50 100 150 200 250 300 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/212018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 700 ,07��.05� A5 1160- Legend ................... EG Proposed 1158 WS Proposed ■ Ground 1156 0 Bank Sta 1154 c 152 1152- w LU 1150- 15011481 1148- 1IV{ -. 1144�i i r-T—i iTr i r r�r r r rTi r r r� 0 100 204 300 400 544 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4!212018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 600 Legend ... ........... ..... _... EG Proposed WS Proposed Ground i Bank Sta 100 200 300 400 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 500 0 100 200 300 400 500 60D Station (ft) Legend EG Proposed WS Proposed ..........---------- .. Crit Proposed ■ Ground Ineff s Bank Sta HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 41212018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 400 .25 .12 .2 1158 - Legend .......................... EG Proposed 1156 WS Proposed ........ .... .I ....... ,.... 1154 Crit Proposed t Ground 1152 Ineff • Bank Sta 1150 - cc.. w 1146- 1144- 11421 14611441142 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS 300 3.1, 4 > 4 1155 Legend ...................... EG Proposed 1154 WS Proposed t 1Ground 152 • Bank Sta 1150 c M 1148- 11146- 1144- 1142- 11401 148-1146114411421140 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Station (tt) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 200 15 .08�: .15 1158 Legend ........................ 1158 EG Proposed WS Proposed .......----- 1 ---- ------ 1154 Crit Proposed Ground 1152 Ineff e c 1150 Bank Sta o 1148 LU - 1146 -- 1144- 1142 1140 0 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flory: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 150 05 _62'.-.05� 1158 Legend ......................... 1156 EG Proposed WS Proposed 1154 Crit Proposed Ground 1152 lreff e 1150 Bank Sta C O 7 w 1148------------ 1146- 1144- 1142- 1140 ....� ............. :,:_._ ............................. _ _a. . 1146 -. _.... �. 1144 1142 1140 0 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) HEC -RAS model Plan: Proposed 4/2/2018 Geom: Base Conditions Geometry Flow: 1 Flow Profiles RS = 100 .15 ��.16 .15 1158 Legend 115E EG Proposed WS Proposed 1154 ----------- }...-._---- crit Proposed 1152 x- Ground A-- Ineff 11501. c Bank Sta 0 1148 ...............------------- ....... ,._»--------- ---------------------- -- ..... ..... n m w 1146- 1461144114211401138 1144- 1142- 1140- 1138 0 200 400 600 800 Station (ft) A 3 alb8 AA - br _ f cu ► .•0 , ,• cu �� •� 1 �'► 00 ` Ln CL CL ►�,rt�: �.J+'1xt�7� a �. • � ���, 4 ���� �: �T: \ � �� �� � may, ` � , �.J+'')�� ►��,. �� \�i._ . ,.moi 4 n 4 • C_.. : ,• =, OF91 �� ` 1. Number and size of the current and proposed storage units To determine the mix of units going into a new building, we use past and current occupancy trends to pinpoint our customers' needs. Because of this, we would want to see how Building G rents up, before determining our unit mix for Building F (which will be built later). We're pretty sure the unit would be 20% standard units and 80% climate controlled units. (See page 2.) 2. Renderings of the proposed building We do not have 3-D or profile renderings of either building as we remain in the active planning stages. The location, size and shape are set, and we are in the process of laying out the first of the two buildings in the expansion. Both buildings will be at least on the level of the current property's buildings, if not a nicer aesthetic. Attached is a picture of a similar building at our Apperson location that is two -stories, like Building G will be, and has some of the accents we have introduced at Apperson. (See pages 3-5.) 3. Any additional information on the proposed buffer The existing gas transmission line easement occupies the 30' (approximately) immediately adjacent to the property line. There are absolute restrictions against plantings and structures such as fencing within that easement. Therefore, we hope to work with the County to fulfill the intent of the buffer yard requirements with plantings next to the easement while taking advantage of the 30' gas easement to meet the dimensional requirement. 4. Any additional information on the proposed stormwater management since the development is located in the floodplain Stormwater management (quantity) will utilize underground detention beneath the drive aisle, just as with the original development. We anticipate an outfall from this facility in the same location as the existing facility discharge point, and if feasible would join the existing storm drain to utilize the existing outfall. Starkey Schedule of Values - Current Buildings BLDG Total Sq. / Rentable Rentable Mech / Elect Stories Year Built Ft. S Ft. I U nits I Starkey A 8,800 Current 48 office/garage 1 1998-9 B 6,000 TBD 27 0 1 1998-9 C 34,650 21 229 3 cc 2 2000 D 2,400 5x15 st 26 0 1 2000 E 10,200 36 69 1 cc 1 2008 John Deere 3,750 28 n/a n/a 1 1998-9 JDLsm bldg 1,200 34 n/a n/a 1 2012 Total 67,000 53,700 399 26 Current Unit Mix Current Bldg G Bldg F Total 5x5 st 13 TBD 13 5x5 cc 17 22 39 5x10 st 21 8 29 5x10 cc 27 26 53 5x15 st 12 6 18 5x15 cc 16 20 36 10x10 st 68 68 10x10 cc 49 28 77 10x15st 36 6 42 10x15 cc 34 26 60 10x20st 36 4 40 10x20cc 8 26 34 10x25 st 16 16 10x25 cc 15 8 23 10x30 st 22 22 10x30 cc 4 4 10x35 st 1 1 10x35 cc 2 2 10x40cc 1 1 15x30 cc 1 1 Total: 1 399 1 180 1 1 579 iruor-rezoning-ean-rezoning exnioii TAX jff..W T -13A0 TAX JU RI14A0 1M R1 RIMTAX JUM 1&00 1 TAX @Z*— � 16.00 !AX ��097.i9—CRr \ &; ZM T'�71�8—OXO-17�OD JAg FURL \ + NS \ \ \ TAX 18-02m 11.01 TAX X116-0 201 \ • 1�. �� \ "VIRGINIA VARSITY i _STOP Gt;� ,)" �- VVS EXPANS ON ti _ r&o W 2.1255 ACRES M BE • �ESEEIALL UP r� BRIER NURSERIESF TAX m TAX , REZONING and TAX RI" mc 40 RIC SPECIAL USE PERMIT 150' 0 150' CONCEPTUAL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 150' T Wc;mm Virginia Varsity Storage DATE: April 4, 2018 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. SCALE:ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS COMM. NO.. 1�r-15°r ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 17-051 4664 BRAMBLETON AVENUE PHONE: (540) 774-4411 P.O. BOX 20669 FAX: (540) 772-9445 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 E-MAIL: MAIL@LUMSDENPC.COM e:\lapc\autocad\drawings\2017\17057\eng\17057-rezoning-edIt.dwg a Site oll !` larehouse --.-S iteOne �: IA' TY MUM SELF STORAGE 1 A;O# Adim i 1-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-61. I-1 LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-61-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the I-1, low intensity industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service area which are suitable for less intensive industrial activities. These areas are primarily designated based on the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from flooding, as well as the availability of adequate sewer and water capacity, access to arterial road network, and proximity to rail and airport facilities or the interstate highway system. This district generally coincides with the recommendations for the principal industrial land use category contained in the comprehensive plan, and particularly those areas unsuitable for more intensive or potentially hazardous industrial uses. Distributing these areas around the county in a planned manner to create employment centers within close proximity to residential growth areas and reduce heavy traffic generation of industrial uses is encouraged. Since land with suitable characteristics for less intensive industrial development is limited in the county, a high degree of protection is promoted where industrial development is located adjacent to existing or future residential areas. The conversion and/or redevelopment of existing non -conforming uses in this district which are unrelated to industrial needs is also encouraged. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § If, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Day Care Center * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Maintenance and Service Facilities Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services Utility Services, Major Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Laboratories Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Parts / Supply, Retail * Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Communication Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Equipment Sales and Rental Garden Center * Laundry 2 1-1 District Regulations 1-1 District Regulations Personal Improvement Services Restaurant, General Retail Sales Veterinary Hospital / Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble Recycling Centers and Stations Transportation Terminal Truck Terminal Warehousing and Distribution 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * Wind Energy System, Small* (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership * Automobile Rental / Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Convenience Store * 3 1-1 District Regulations Fuel Center * Gasoline Station Manufactured Home Sales Mini -warehouse * Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 2. Industrial Uses Composting * Construction Yards Resource Extraction Transfer Station * 3. Miscellaneous Uses Aviation Facilities, Private Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings Wind Energy System, Large Wind Energy System, Utility (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042297, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27- 99; Ord. No. 082807-18, § 1, 8-28-07; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 091311-7, § 1, 9-13-11, Ord. No. 111213- 15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 092215-9, § 1, 9-22-15, Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16, Ord. No. 062717-4, § 1, 7-27-17) Sec. 30-61-3. Site Development Regulations. 4 1-1 District Regulations General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: behind front building line and 3 feet from side line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. All structures: When adjoining property zoned residential, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required side and/or rear yard adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of 5 1-1 District Regulations the structure which exceeds forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited. (D) Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 9, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Cel FO District Regulations SEC. 30-74. FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT. Sec. 30-74-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of these floodplain provisions is to prevent the following hazards: The loss of life and property; 2. The creation of health and safety hazards; The disruption of commerce and governmental services; 4. The extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief, and, 5. The impairment of the tax base. (B) These provisions are designed to accomplish the above purposes by: Regulating uses, activities, and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities, and development, will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities, and frequencies; 2. Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities, and development from locating within areas subject to flooding; Requiring all those uses, activities, and developments that do occur in flood -prone areas to be protected and/or floodproofed against flooding and flood damage; 4. Protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards. Sec. 30-74-2. Applicability and Administration. (A) These provisions shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Roanoke County and identified as being within a floodplain, as stipulated in this section. (B) These provisions shall supersede any regulations currently in effect in floodplain areas. Where conflict exists between these provisions and those of any underlying zoning district, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. (C) In the event any provision concerning a floodplain area is declared inapplicable as a result of any legislative or administrative actions or judicial discretion, the basic underlying zoning district provisions shall remain applicable. Sec. 30-74-3. Compliance. FO District Regulations (A) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated, constructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compliance with the terms and provisions of this section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. Sec. 30-74-4. Delineation of Areas. (A) The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to inundation by waters of the one hundred -year flood. The primary basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the flood insurance study for the county prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated September 28, 2007, as amended. These areas are more specifically defined as follows: The Floodway is delineated for purposes of this section using the criteria that a certain area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the 100 -year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 4 of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map accompanying that study. 2. The Flood -Fringe shall be that area of the 100 -year floodplain not included in the Floodway. The basis for the outermost boundary of the Flood -Fringe shall be the 100 -year flood elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map accompanying the study. The special floodplain shall be those areas identified as an AE zone on the maps accompanying the flood insurance study for which one hundred -year flood elevations have been provided but for which no floodway has been delineated. 4. The Approximated Floodplain shall be those floodplain areas shown on the flood insurance rate map for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided, and all other floodplain areas where the drainage area is greater than 100 acres. Where the specific 100 -year flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data such the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Floodplain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this elevation in accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic engineering techniques. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly reflect currently accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall be related to existing land use and potential development under existing zoning. Studies, analyses, computations, etc., shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the director of community development. 2 FO District Regulations (Ord. No. 92893-18, § 1, 9-28-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 10, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 92695-18, § 1, 9- 26-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § lc., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 012505-4, § 1, 1-25-05; Ord. No. 082807- 19, § 1, 8-28-07) Sec. 30-74-5. Creation of Overlay. (A) The floodplain areas described above shall be an overlay to the existing underlying zoning districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, and as such, the provisions for the floodplain areas shall serve as a supplement to the underlying zoning district provisions. (B) The boundaries of the floodplain areas are established as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map which is declared to be part of this chapter and which shall be kept on file in the office of the administrator. (Ord. No. 92893-18, § 1, 9-28-93) Sec. 30-74-6. Floodplain Boundary Changes and Interpretation. (A) The delineation of any of the floodplain areas may be revised by the board of supervisors where natural or manmade changes have occurred and/or made detailed studies conducted or undertaken by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other qualified agency, or an individual documents the need for such change. However, prior to any such change, approval must be obtained from the Federal Insurance Administration. (B) Initial interpretations of the boundaries of the floodplain areas shall be made by the administrator. Should a dispute arise concerning the boundaries of any of the floodplain areas, the board of zoning appeals shall make the necessary determination. The person questioning or contesting the location of the floodplain area boundary shall be given an opportunity to present his case to the board of zoning appeals and to submit technical evidence. Procedures for such appeals shall be as outlined in Section 30-24 of this ordinance. Sec. 30-74-7. Floodplain Area Provisions, Generally. (A) All uses, activities, and development occurring within any floodplain area shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a zoning permit. Such development shall be undertaken only in strict compliance with the provisions of this section and with all other applicable codes and ordinances such as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the administrator shall require all applications to include compliance with all applicable state and federal laws. (B) Under no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or development adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways or any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. Prior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels FO District Regulations or floodways of any watercourse, stream, etc., within Roanoke County, approval shall be obtained from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water. Further, notification of the proposal shall be given to all affected adjacent jurisdictions. Copies of such notification shall be forwarded to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water, the State Department of Intergovernmental Affairs, and the Federal Insurance Administration. (C) The lowest floor elevation of any new residential structure constructed within a floodplain area shall be at least two (2) feet above base flood elevation. The lowest floor elevation of any new non-residential structure constructed within a floodplain area shall be at least one (1) foot above base flood elevation, unless such structure is floodproofed. In addition, no existing structure shall be modified, expanded or enlarged unless the new construction complies with this standard. (D) All applications for development in the floodplain district and all building permits issued for the floodplain shall incorporate the following information: 1. For structures to be elevated, the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement). 2. For structures to be floodproofed (nonresidential only), the elevation to which the structure will be floodproofed. The elevation of the one hundred -year flood. 4. Topographic information showing existing and proposed ground elevations. (E) For all new subdivisions which adjoin or include floodplain areas identified in the flood insurance study, the base flood elevation shall be shown on the final record plat. (F) All recreational vehicles located in a FEMA designated floodplain shall either: Be on site for fewer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, be fully licensed and inspected, and ready for highway use; or 2. Meet the minimum requirements for placement and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes as contained in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. A recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only be quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and has no permanently attached additions. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 11, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 92695, § 1, 9-26-95) Sec. 30-74-8. Floodway Development Regulations. 4 FO District Regulations (A) In the floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such development on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements which have been approved by all appropriate authorities as required above. (B) The placement of any manufactured home, except in an existing manufactured home park within the floodway is specifically prohibited. (C) In the floodway, the following uses, types and activities are permitted provided that (1) they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district, (2) are not prohibited by any other ordinance and (3) no specific land use requires any type of structure, fill, or storage of materials and equipment: Agricultural 2. Public Parks and Recreational Areas Outdoor Sports and Recreation 4. Golf Courses Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas. 6. Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as yard areas, parking and loading areas, airport landing strips, etc. (D) The following uses and activities may be permitted by Special Use pursuant to Section 30-19 of this ordinance provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district and are not prohibited by this or any other ordinance: Structures (except for manufactured homes) accessory to the uses and activities by right, above. 2. Certain utilities and public facilities and improvements such as pipe lines, water and sewage treatment plants, and other similar or related uses. Water -related uses and activities such as marinas, docks, wharves, piers, etc. 4. Extraction of sand, gravel, and other materials (where no increase in level of flooding or velocity is caused thereby). Storage of materials and equipment provided that they are not buoyant, flammable or explosive, and are not subject to major damage by flooding, or provided that such material and equipment is firmly anchored to prevent flotation or movement, FO District Regulations and/or can be readily removed from the area within the time available after flood warning. 6. Other similar uses and activities provided they cause no increase in flood heights and/or velocities. All uses, activities, and structural development, shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the flood -proofing provisions contained in all other applicable codes and ordinances. Sec. 30-74-9. Flood -Fringe, Special Floodplain and Approximated Floodplain Development Regulations. (A) In the flood -fringe, special floodplain and approximated floodplain the development and/or use of land shall be permitted in accordance with the regulations of the underlying zoning district provided that all such uses, activities, and/or development shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the floodproofing and related provisions contained in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and all other applicable codes and ordinances. However, in the special floodplain and the approximated floodplain areas the applicant and/or developer shall evaluate the effects of the proposed development and/or use of land on the floodplain with current hydrologic and hydraulic engineering techniques. The applicant and/or developer shall submit studies, analysis, computations, etc. to show the delineation of a floodway based on the requirement that all existing and future development not increase the one hundred -year flood elevation more than one (1) foot at any point. The engineering principle, equal reduction of conveyance, shall be used to make the determination of increased flood height. (Ord. No. 082807-19, § 1, 8-28-07) Sec. 30-74-10. Procedures for Special Uses in Floodways. (A) Any use listed as permitted with a special use in a floodway shall be allowed only after application to the county board of supervisors. All such applications shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures outlined in section 30-19 of this ordinance. In addition to information required by section 30-19, all such application shall include the following: Plans in triplicate drawn to scale not less than 1" to 100' horizontally showing the location, dimensions, and contours (at five-foot intervals) of the lot, existing and proposed structures, fill, storage areas, water supply, sanitary facilities, and relationship of the floodway to the proposal. 2. A typical valley cross-section as necessary to adequately show the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and 100 -year flood elevation. Ce FO District Regulations A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream. 4. A summary report, prepared by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities; the seriousness of flood damage to the use; and other pertinent technical matters. A list of names and addresses of adjoining property owners. (B) In acting upon such applications, the planning commission and the county board of supervisors shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance and: The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. No special use shall be granted for any proposed use, development, or activity within the floodway that will cause any increase in flood levels during the 100 -year flood. 2. The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury of others. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. 4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the county. 6. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. 7. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. 9. The relationship of the proposed use to the community plan and floodplain management program for the county. 10. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. 11. Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of this Section. 7 FO District Regulations (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1 f , 4-27-99) Sec. 30-74-11. Variances. (A) The board of zoning appeals may consider variances to the requirements of this section, under the following guidelines and conditions: Variances may not be considered within any floodway if any increase in flood levels during the 100 -year flood would result. 2. Variance requests may be granted for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places without regard to the procedures set forth in this section. Variances may be considered for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot contiguous and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the 100 -year flood level using the guidelines set forth in Section 30-74-10(B) above. (B) The board of zoning appeals may refer any application and accompanying documentation pertaining to any request for a variance to any engineer or other qualified person or agency for technical assistance in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, and the adequacy of the plans for protection and other related matters. Variances shall only be issued after the board of zoning appeals has determined that the granting of such will not result in: Unacceptable or prohibited increases in flood heights; 2. Additional threats to public safety; Extraordinary public expense; 4. Creation of nuisances; Fraud or victimization of the public; or, 6. Conflict with local laws or ordinances. Variances shall only be issued after the board of zoning appeals has determined that the variance will be the minimum relief to any hardship. (C) The board of zoning appeals shall notify the applicant for a variance, in writing, that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the 100 -year flood elevation (a) increases the risks to life and property, and (b) will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance. A record of the above notification as well as all variance actions, FO District Regulations including justification for their issuance, shall be maintained and any variances which are issued shall be noted in the annual report submitted to the Federal Insurance Administration. Sec. 30-74-12. Existing Structures in Floodplain Areas. (A) A structure or use of a structure or premises which lawfully existed before the enactment of these provisions, but which is not in conformity with these provisions may be continued subject to the following conditions: Existing structures and/or uses located in the floodway shall not be expanded or enlarged (unless the effect of the proposed expansion or enlargement on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements). 2. Any modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a structure and/or use located in any floodplain area to an extent or amount of fifty (50) percent or more of its market value, shall be undertaken only in full compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (Ord. No. 92695-18, § 1, 9-26-95) Sec. 30-74-13. Liability. (A) The degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this section is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on acceptable engineering methods of study. Larger floods may occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. This section does not imply that areas outside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such areas, will be free from flooding or flood damages. (B) This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke County or any officers or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. M VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 6.5± acre parcel of land, ) generally located on Starkey Road 200') west of its intersection with Crescent) oo within the Cave Spring ) FINALORDER 00 Magisterial District, and Ln ) recorded as parcel # 87.18-2-24 ) W in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THEHONORABLE SUPERVISORS 0FROANOKECOUNTY: y MAV '►�19�88 Lit E-+ Z N F' WHEREAS, your Petitioner Starkey Associates 2 v did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above -referenced parcel 0 from M-2 District to B-2 District E-+ cn for the purpose of develolino a Retail ShopIpInnI Center - 4 [a w 0 1:4 WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public g hearing of the petition on June 7 , 19 88 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on June 28, 19 88 the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved on June 28, 1988, with proffers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 87.18-2-24 and recorded in Deek Book Page and legally described below, be rezoned from District to District. - 9 - Legal Description of Property: �0 e6, -'io Being 6.938 acres situated along the north side of Virginia Route 119 (Starkey Road) in Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, said 6.938 acres, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point common to 17.908 acres as conveyed to Starkey Associates, A Virginia General Partnership recorded in Deed Book 1282, Page 1383, in the Clerk's Office for the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, the right-of-way of said . Virginia Route 119, and property of Inland Properties, Inc., A Virginia Corporation, as recorded in Deed Book 886, Page 652 in the aforesaid Clerk's Office, said point also lying in a curve on the north right-of-way line of said Virginia Route 119; thence N 150 05' 59" E, •440.32` feet along the line common to said 17.908 .acres and said Inland Properties, Inc. to a point; thence along four zoning lines the following courses'and distances;`N 150 05' 59" E, 29.39 feet to a point, -N 730 03' 34" E, 191.11 feet to a point,�S 890 14' 58" E, 229.02 feet to a point, S 760 14' 47" E, 257.04 feet to a point; thence. S 350 52' 28" E, 280.36 feet -along the line common to said 17.908 acres and map of Cresent Heights Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 256, in the aforesaid Clerk's Office, to a point; said point being the corner common to said 17,908 acres, said Cresent Heights Subdivision and the right-of-way of said Virginia Route 119; -thence along the line common to said 17.908 acres and said Virginia Route 119 the following courses and distances; S 750 30' 29" W, 144.39 feet to a point; S 780 46' 38" W, 99.50 feet to a point, S 770 37' 08" W, 99.35 feet to a point; S 750 08' 44" W, 100.12 feet to a point, S 780 00' 29" W, 439.50 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left; thence 90.34 feet along the arc of said curve to the left whose radius equals 741.20 feet, delta angle equals 060.59' 01" and chord bearing and distance equals S 74 30' 58" W, 90.29 feet to the point of -BEGINNING and containing a computed acreage of 6.938 acres. BE IT FURTM ORDMM that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson following recorded vote: . AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None AWW: Supervisor Robers and upon the Z��- Depu yClerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections .Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning & Zoning John Wiley, Director, Real F�stitte- Assessment 00 ao H 1-1 110 H 2 w H Z O U 0 H Q W O P4 04 w 4 VIRGINIA: 13rFORr 'I'i►r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROIINOKF COUHIY A 6.5-}- acre I-var-cel. of land, ) generally loc<1ted(,r, Staikcy )Zon l 200' ) west' nf' its ilicersect iml wiLli Crescent ) within the v c, F 111;d. WAgisterial District., and ) recorded as f),-trccl {I -97.-18-2-211 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) `PO 'Pflr IIONORABU SUPERVISORS OF ROhNOKf3 COUNTY: PROI. l l al OP CONDPPIONS r/ rr P' W Being in accord with Sec. 1S.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and ,eC. 21-LO5T. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Starkey Associates _ hereby voluntarily proffers to the Hoard of sufx-rvisors o f Rckinoke County,Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning o f the above -referenced parcel of land: (1) That the B-2 permitted uses for this portion of the property will be restricted to those as currently stated in the current Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Section 21-23-2-A; (1) , (2) , (4) , (6) but only for Bowling Centers, (7) , and (10) but for Clinic only. (2) That the access points onto Starkey Road excluding any industrial access roadway be limited to a maximum of three (3) such accesses. (3) That the projected parking areas be aesthetically treated with landscaping and/or planting areas. (4) That all dumpsters will be screened. (5) That the maximum light pole height will be thirty feet (30') and directed inward onto the parking areas and that the maximum light levels at the property lines adjacent to residential property will not exceed one (1) foot candle. (6) Thatt:here will be no billboards or similar outdoor advertising. Respectfully sulinitted, np r - 11?c-titioner AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 ORDINANCE 090898-101 CORRECTING ORDINANCE 081898-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.4 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 5800 BLOCK OF STARKEY ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 87.18-2-24) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 1-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 1-1 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MINI - WAREHOUSE UPON THE APPLICATION OF VIRGINIA VARSITY TRANSFER, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; WHEREAS, this ordinance corrects Ordinance 081898-1 1; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 5.4 acres, as described herein, and located in the 5800 block of Starkey Road (Part of Tax Map Number 87.18-2-24) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of 1-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of 1-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Virginia Varsity Transfer, 1 Inc. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The buildings and doors to the storage buildings will not be the colors red or orange. 4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Virginia Varsity Transfer Inc. to construct a mini -warehouse to be located in the 5800 block of Starkey Road (part of Tax Map No. 87.18-2-24) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Corner #1, said point located on the northerly right-of-way of Starkey Road (Virginia Secondary Route 904) said point also being the southeasterly corner of Tract IA (PB 15, page 68); thence leaving Starkey Road and with the easterly boundary of Tract IA, N 15 deg. 05' 59" E. passing the northeastern corner at approximately 412.00 feet, in all 440.32 feet to Corner #2, said point located on the easterly boundary of Tract 11B (PB11, page 151); thence continuing with Tract 1 B for the following 3 courses; thence continuing with Tract 1 B for the following 3 courses; thence with a curve to the left, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 39 deg. 24' 02", an arc length of 171.92 feet, a radius of 250.00, a chord of 168.55 feet and bearing N. 4 deg. 36' 02" W. to Corner #3; thence with a curve to the right, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 39 deg. 24'02", an arc length of 206.30 feet, a radius of 300.00 feet, a chord of 202.26 feet and bearing N. 04 deg. 36' 01" W. to Corner #4; thence N. 15 deg. 05' 59" E. 465.19 feet to Corner #5, said point located on the westerly boundary of original Crescent Heights Subdivision (PB 1, page 256); thence leaving Tract 1 B and with Crescent Heights, S. 35 deg. 52' 28" E. 1266.16 feet to Corner #6, said point located on the northerly right-of-way of Starkey Road (Virginia Secondary Route 1► 904); thence leaving Crescent Heights Subd. and with Starkey Road, s. 75 deg. 30' 29" W. 53.70 feet to a point being the southeasterly corner of proposed New Tract IIA (7.696 acre parcel); thence leaving Starkey Road and with 4 proposed new division lines surrounding New Tract IIA, N. 35 deg. 52' 28" W. 599.41 feet to a point; thence S. 77 deg. 39' 54" W. 403.27 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 37 deg. 23'02", an arc length of 195.74 feet, a radius of 300.00 feet, a chord of 192.29 feet and bearing S. 03 deg. 35' 32" E. to a point; thence S. 15 deg. 05' 59" W. 409.32 feet to a point, said point located on the northerly right-of-way of Starkey Road (Virginia Secondary Route 904); thence with said Starkey Road and leaving the southwesterly corner of proposed New Tract 11A with a curve to the left, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 4 deg. 32' 56", an arc length of 58.85 feet, a radius of 741.20 feet, a chord of 58.83 feet and bearing S. 73 deg. 17' 56" W. to Corner #1, the place of Beginning, and containing 5.385 acres. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2018 ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 2.1256 ACRES FROM C - 2C (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL WITH CONDITIONS) DISTRICT TO 1-1 (LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT; TO REMOVE PROFFERED CONDITIONS; AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITY, LOCATED AT 5881 STARKEY ROAD, CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 087.18- 02-24.00-0000) WHEREAS, Virginia Varsity Storage is the contract purchaser of approximately 2.13 acres of adjacent land to its existing mini -warehouse facility on Starkey Road from Monroe Gardens LLC (Greenbrier Nursery); and WHEREAS, Virginia Varsity Storage is requesting to: A. Rezone this property from C -2C (high intensity commercial with conditions) to 1- 1 (low intensity industrial), B. Remove the six (6) proffered conditions on the property: That the B-2 permitted uses for this portion of the property will be restricted to those as currently stated in the current Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Section 21-23-2-A; (1), (2), (4),(6) but only for Bowling Centers, (7), and (10) but for Clinic only; ii. That the access points onto Starkey Road excluding any industrial access roadway be limited to a maximum of three (3) such accesses; iii. That the projected parking areas be aesthetically treated with landscaping and/or planting areas; iv. That all dumpsters will be screened; Page 1 of 4 V. That the maximum light pole height will be thirty feet (30') and directed inward onto the parking areas and that the maximum light levels at the property lines adjacent to the residential property will not exceed one (1) foot candle; and vi. That there will be no billboards or similar outdoor advertising; and C. Obtain a special use permit for a mini -warehouse facility (which is required in an 1-1 district for mini -warehouse use); and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 22, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing were held on June 28, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2018 and subsequently recommended approval of the application; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The request to rezone the property (approximately 2.1256 acres) located at 5881 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Tax map no. 087.18-02- 24.00-0000) from C -2C, (High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions) to 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District) is approved; 2. The request to remove all proffered conditions associated with the property is approved; and 3. The requested special use permit is approved, with the following condition: Page 2 of 4 a. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled "Rezoning and Special Use Permit Conceptual Plan" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. and dated April 4, 2018. 4. In approving the above, the Board finds that the granting of the special use permit meets with the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code. The proposed use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards, and further conforms with the following general standards: a. The proposed use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan of the County, and with official County policies adopted in relation thereto, including the stated purposes of the zoning ordinance. b. The proposed use will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community; the Planning Commission has evaluated adverse use with consideration to items such as, but not limited to, traffic congestion, noise, lights, dust, drainage, water quality, odor, fumes and vibrations. c. In considering impacts, the Planning Commission has given due regard to the timing of the operation, site design, access, screening, and other matters which might be regulated to mitigate adverse impact. Page 3 of 4 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 4 of 4