Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/26/2019 - RegularINVOCATION: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors February 26, 2019 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board." Page 1 of 6 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda February 26, 2019 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for February 26, 2019. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are closed -captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department for receiving accreditation from the American Correctional Association (ACA) and the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections (Eric Orange, Sheriff) D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS Page 2 of 6 F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.- 1. ommission: 1. The petition of Skyway Towers to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (cell tower) approximately 199 feet in height in an AR, Agricultural/Residential, District on approximately 4.00 acres, located near the 6700 block of Split Oak Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating funds in the amount of $187,000 from County Capital Reserves for fiscal year 2018-2019 for the purpose of providing funding for the County Facilities Assessment (Christopher R. Bever, Director of Management and Budget; Rob Light, Director of General Services) 2. Ordinance amending sections of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance dealing with sign regulations (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFAC) (appointed by District and At -Large) 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) 3. Library Board (appointed by District) I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — November 7, 2019 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Arrowhead Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation System 4. Resolution requesting acceptance of Lawson Lane of Belmont Section I into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Page 3 of 6 5. Resolution requesting acceptance of Leighburn Drive of Buckland South into the Virginia Department of Transportation System 6. Resolution requesting acceptance of Matthew Drive, Adam Drive and Spring Grove Drive of Edgefield Subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 7. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Edwin R. "Randy" Leach, Commonwealth's Attorney, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures as of January 31, 2019 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of January 31, 2019 5. Accounts Paid — January 31, 2019 6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of January 31, 2019 7. Proclamation signed by the Chairman — Multiple Sclerosis Education and Awareness Month L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the County Administrator's Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (Christopher R, Bever, Director of Management and Budget) Page 4 of 6 EVENING SESSION M. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 1. Resolution approving an amendment to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would change the future land use designation of four (4) parcels south of Colonial Avenue, between 4904 Colonial Avenue and 4920 Colonial Avenue, from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition; Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) N. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc. to rezone approximately 1.17 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District for a medical office, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) 2. The petition of Rhonda S. Conner to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R-1 S, Low Density Residential, District with a special use permit to acquire a multiple dog permit on 4.68 acres, located at 6185 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) 3. The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County et al to amend the master plan for the Center for Research and Technology and to remove the proffered condition on properties totaling approximately 480.21 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, located on Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) 4. The petition of Venture Storage Group, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District to construct a mini warehouse storage facility on 3.10 acres, located near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) 5. The petition of Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for a commercial outdoor sports and recreation facility, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive, Vinton Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning) O. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Page 5 of 6 P. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. George G. Assaid 2. Martha B. Hooker 3. David F. Radford 4. P. Jason Peters 5. Phil C. North Q. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 of 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Recognition of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department for receiving accreditation from the American Correctional Association (ACA) and the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections Steve Turner Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Request for the Board of Supervisors to offer recognition for the Sheriff's Office's Accreditation During 2018, the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office was involved in two audits of its policies and procedures. As a result, the Sheriff's Office was awarded accreditation from the American Correctional Association (ACA) and the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections January 14, 2019. This will cover a period from 2019 thru 2022. To gain this accreditation, compliance was required in 100% of 60 mandatory standards. The Sheriff's Office also maintained 99.31% compliance of 323 non -mandatory standards. The Roanoke County/Salem Jail is 1 of 14 local jails in Virginia to achieve this accredited status. This was the seventh successful audit dating back to 2000. Also, on January 24, 2019, the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office was certified as an "Accredited Agency" by the Virginia Law Enforcement Professional Standards Commission (VLEPSC). This certification is for a period of four years. There were 191 standards that were met to achieve this certification. The Sheriff's Office Court Services, Civil Process Unit and all law enforcement functions are the main focus of the audit. This was the third successful audit dating to the original on December 2, 2010. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of Skyway Towers to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (cell tower) approximately 199 feet in height in an AR, Agricultural/Residential, District on approximately 4.00 acres, located near the 6700 block of Split Oak Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for March 26, 2019. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Skyway Towers to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (cell tower) approximately 199 feet in height in an AR, Agricultural/Residential, District on approximately 4.00 acres, located near the 6700 block of Split Oak Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for March 26, 2019. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P © Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Ont Date received: Received by: ❑ Rezoning Q Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal Q Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants natne/address w/zip Phone: Application tee: PC/BZA date: Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone ##: Ptacards issued: 1305 date.- ate:Case Property Location Magisterial District: Gave Spring CaseNumber Community Planning area: NIA ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning Q Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal Q Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants natne/address w/zip Phone: Skyway Towers (drew Patterson - Agent) Work: 3367 Madaca Lane, Tampa, FL 33618 Ce]I #: 804-363-0891 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone ##: Barbara A. Garst, Irrev Living Trust Work: 5103 Upland Game Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax No. #: Property Location Magisterial District: Gave Spring Terminus of Split Oak Road Community Planning area: NIA Tax Map NO.: 096.01-02-25.00-0000 Existing Zoning: AR Size of parecl(s): Acres: 4 Existing Land Use: None (vacant) REZONING, SPECL4L USE PERMIT, FVAIYER AND COMP PLAN (15 2 2232)REVIEW APPLICANTS (Ii/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: N/A Proposed Land Use: New telecommunications tower Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 13 No C1 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes lx No 11 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Ar Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordina 9 Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to -- Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLE, TE. RISIW/CP VIAA RISIW/CP V/AA tt/SIWCP V/AA Consultation 8 112" x I P concept plan Applic Application Metes and bounds dcscription Proffers, i Justification Water and sewer application Adjoiaingproperty owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property ort wner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. Owner's Signature 2 jusTiraCATI ON FOR REZONING, SPECIAL. USE PRRMIT WAIVE,1110111 CQAW PLAN (15.2 22321 R +'VJEW RE' QUIISTS Applicant SkYwaY 'Towers The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to detoiinine the need and justification for the change in .terns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer tine following questions as thoroughly as. possible. Use additional space if necessary: Please explain. how the request furthers,the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose.found at the beginning of the applicable :coning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The Applicant Is proposing a 199' monopole tower to serve residents, businesses and travelers In the area: There are no existing collocation opportunities within the search ring; therefore, a new tower Is warranted. The tower will conform to all Roanoke County Zoning Ordnance requirements; including height, design and setbacks (also see attached narrative). Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The tower will be fenced with a gated seven (7) foot chain link fence. The site will be accessed by an existing private road (Spilt Oak Road) extending from Poage Valley Road Extension. The tower Is unmanned and will require approximately one maintenance trip per month. The tower will be constructed in accordance with all FAA, FCC, state and local requirements. Please describethe impact(s) of the request on the properly itself, the adjoining properties, and the smounding area, as well as the impacts on public.services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire. and reseue. The tower will have minimal .adverse impacts for the following reasons: It will be located on a d acre: wooded lot where It will be screened on all sides by existing mature trees; The applicant has chosen a location on site where very few trees will need to be removed for construction of the tower; The tower will be setback over 3t79 foot from the closest residence; The tower will have vary limited visibility from surrounding roads, including the Blue Ridge Parkway and Bent Mountain. Road. The tower will provide a benefit to the surrounding area by allowing residents to work and shop from home, providin students access to the latest online educational opportunities and equipping emergency personnel with a reliable communication notwork. CONCH PT PLAN CHECKLIST A, concept p.laii of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the laud use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further; the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request, In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to. limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable. by County permitting regulations. The. concept plan should. riot be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is requiredprior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan. and building perm it procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit,. waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner, The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request; The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra Reins; but the fbilowirij& are considered minimum. - ALL APPLICANTS x a. Applicant name and name of development x b. Date, scale ondnorth arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, ate, X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X g. All property lines and easements x h. Ail buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights x i, Location, widths and names of all existing.or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development X j., Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces kelclilion al it formw don re! idred forRE, ZDNING aird SPECIAL USEPERMIT APP.LICANT,S T130 k. Existing utilities (water; sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways; etatrances/exits; curb openings and. crossovers X in. Topography map in a suitable scaleand contour intervals N/A m Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections NIA o. tocatious of all adjacent fire hydrants NIA p, Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed N/A q, If project is to be phased; please show phase schedule I certify that all iters re iced in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date 6 Community Development0 Planning & Toning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center + Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of Intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development wlth ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) + Development in an area where there Is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any slte that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date. April 19, 2005 7 ROAIypk F Community Development h Planning & Zoning Division 13 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional inforination prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written mernorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TR,MFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County PIanning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note; a Fist ofpotential lane/ uses and situations that would necessitate fitr^thea- stately is provided cis part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 79, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature Date PROPAGATION MAPS PHOTO -SIMULATIONS I 5 S. .h� Lw7s as ; :%. a• .,,+•. �=t� , - '- 74 r f t• { ca y s A S ti k y•' 1 j ,tTe~fM r t r.m r �, r r rT -, 1, �it4: ey,E_E •� i CL # i jiJn • cz 4s p is rR► dr ,+y, sy cnTt.�' �P.r,l �"''�.`g� „'+��Y•� �dx 'R '.AA h,# ,!'•/k. .atR ..•t . 'i r r.�+ d .* ♦�� > if�ra- P �1 !' f �.�•�•� �i. � `iy Yr __`!� i*'fe. Nx i.t d �r lr��r,►�L.�r � r f!� 1��' fi' rr �'�7' j Nom[ .� -0 .t,�°,.< ''i: � . / "s � e�l. .• �'�'%4,� • �i ,6 t1�� Lt� � .�i.� .1.�`�.Sl� �i.�. :�,1. � e fY e':! .��!'� 1 C'r e - i ♦�' y ! �! 9. R' �'•' .n" �'.sL i 7 A,irj i j�! , Ar f' .. OU 0 00 J (r V ( Yr 1 p�� �l( 't �5�(pl• .1p'•>J 4. /+� ��.�•.• +. r f 1•"'e` qrl , i•yi I' F a rsf �t r� ' },'�'ir#rt ,; 4 S •',, •rI�,;. F .�. j Y. - , .P IE)i/yyr (�V� l_� �11'� '�f1i4 �r fIft" g ,y•'� �_�, ''w `•'qy7"a�e ''�Mmow* ;q'PyF�`'� t. ,� 4ta• ¢„ •� tifh , �,* R 1':i •'��, r" __}.'f si Y !, ,/ �t „ #y•eLl '+" - it vM, -d ,! f �5� Y.SF',s1• f r, �1i d .Y. rr ...a,1�7 ML 0e Jl' s si r v+rr� r •� iry '' ��, � .Y'7f�+�'� }':s ��� e�'.� i I. ° ' 3f�,e� :c31ry �1'ilff��..S•�1j' .•.dk - _ ii '. / �S a .n h'.�1 Fi '�'�,l! TO WAIR REPORT TOWAIR Search Results TOWAIR Determination Results *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your r r NAD83 Coordinates Latitude Longitude Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGL) Support Structure Height (AGL) Site Elevation (AMSL) Structure Type MTOWER - Monopole 37-11-39.6 north 080-02-46.1 west 60.7 59.4 428.9 Tower Construction Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. CLOSE WINDOW + http.llwireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/Asr5earch/towairResult.jsp?printable[9/19/2018 9:53:12 AM] r w 4 w z T UjJ IG iiiirrrrrr�� h kH3N,JM113 1NacAll:N KOLLbYk9O�A�{& [n1(Y.)3u M'JIS3a dhViS loT�S3JOFld a33�sti13 3LIL 13�s t1�YVW L�-6 oV¢ p � m �J mO o a HIE p❑' 14 0 40 y O ti Q U a 4 oW' L ZZCL U3 LLI — O� O F U? �" o�c m4aLU LL flaI HIM 00N LD � W Fo �8 i d d � s W K °u �� p i q F Q W .ash C9 gwg J � ¢ ;tia�� ��g�� U q� a�oa�� � m C7 _ � W � �b��sy a U W s W K °u �� p i q F Q W � m C7 _ � W � �b��sy a U W °�o � �A i6 U W g 5 _ n�E w � 3 K °u 3 � m w a a SyIA w =}°i ''sr c7 4o N� i � ti7 W 3 3� �W O 3 I peQjj I_i.�l Z CC O [L' 3 Z ci laa�avi I �nrdxbdc' I nouv+aa�a� �io-�min�a O� do.�nans 3uu�+s manTrl�s 3AIOZ Hlnos rg dviv •s i ld S A ui a w a w N / w zp z �w 0. j o m �a �0 fl - t 0 O z o En N y F t71 � z d a cn Lo L' � 4ti L 0. ZO X til 1 w w v�vv�pvKrvvy w V U7 a tiJ a 3AIOZ Hlnos rg dviv •s i ld S A 2�^V+0000 �b""'�4i00pp t �ai�b00000 a^l V'3'SN"1N v�vv�pvKrvvy tiJ QO bO�WN.��4 22l'1 V1�Z Z�, z��,y.rhKnm F o E ;A Ogg Q Al o ;� � g5 a • o�9 8 1S ui J Rca ° Zu"1 E' Yi 6 4 QQ LLJ. v s yLL �- CT ¢ VOp m�s��a urv�n�v ��uu�w�+.i�� �� eaamins awL�rs mxtirv�u�s a w ti ory a o a m Z = ewil a¢w z ¢ 30 ti w N "zz��oz Ln UOK d0W O O Wm Q W I ac' w z. z a wi w o w4 Ci u~7 Na40�"ZFn tz U yra r o Y ?-wa O Q r ZW [G Rn �y ��.{C w U� O w Ln z Z = Lh U O Laf U z W z W �.J CDU N 4 } C7 d T U C r Q4' 0 0 6 I A � O Q Z L) ma=d �oz� aw (WL vi z 0 ( °' �i�d o w �Or VIZ Ld 2 cr 2.6WM Ow m0 ws/icr �w �zq �U o �oxr [aL� �� a o C', w¢s'-C7 [JO OH�� w'`l 4 Zwr H Li Ln W ZQ vi 0- W XZIi w 4 O Z LLilw� wz C7 U N 3= Uo cL Wpz m Z mg¢ aZ YnW WpFp ra wW UWm dco Li Ln r �~ z w r x Z in L i- w � 7Um wQ� ,r, [ami or w Q DD Z W N uj F Z r 0 ffl J fK W2 z Z K 4. OV4N WO Lay�p^ WWN �U Ln � o I=��� P;'cw 0 O W aN a a �'"�a�^ w r F-� ozZ raJ� o 1 j��- 'n Z w r d O a O WN Wa h} HVi pt/) 0� xZ Z�cr a` Uzjpo _0 v7ula;n30 � �L�^'�3avaoauir wtoLIJ wm C3 .<o �opao ~ � —' www `O Iz zP- U) 0 �O�XQ �oW�o' o xw u°�ar'ESZ ¢zcol n W- 60 � Zuj OM CL d z w(nw 0. a O �x--�Q =w x a m O 00 �ZL=Z W 0W OJ OJCA w n. v) Cv o r x a s ry w L� oo z F z w w Q. vs w j1 0 � z x 0. O�� OHOO OctiCS h� �W a a4ti ¢° o Quo CoQ x � qin t7 �4 p�2 4404 U4 O v UO 4 4 Z O �l p �.z qq �Q2y-� yg2q tu x vqp � U ODS L3.�¢U I.� ra WW$ L]tV Otidpm O�O� r "�2 o aoppO y0 ���o ONza dS ��p 000 LL, pQ�Ci w22 Lu 4iL�au tai O +iVVO 4,zt ti+w w Z222�c a �¢ti� Z 4U zc3Ly�� O "1. Z g�q�00 O ati0� �: q �AivR a- Soo ;u0. paopgo p- 'zro�Q zwo� oo`_oti 44 � aQa ggQgZk z a, O oQ2�' c5 ~a�e.,4ia4o VkU pC�Sw �' g0��Qti vUf eFll �w q��g01;P-i'1.4q Safi OU �^�2 h'7L'lvLn NW�� L [ll 40ipi''Y2Cs aoNtoNcj w. q�v ¢Zt� o400mt- O O omaLZIUip �sZ2�n O a �d4 O=W� 22yv2o ro Wa� Z np UUUU~00 3 C 2 n x UUUU40 aooW wogwxa Q�q �o.,000 Www ¢QUO�v4Zt 4- B O o LL g&a n3 yp z O l , I ? i , till �44 I , gg 4 lIr 4 ww<omfl- 0 w N a¢< �I e H' z pco. Elk p Q) N n S '�,\'�+� ;h fQ'�1n`J I.CMiYlb(T1�tl 31A` OHii6il1Pf,1i]'J dNdtSlvl'ICllSS33Cili 11ii'fiEA`!7 31LLi13315 IIIBS.YLVI�iS B O o LL g&a n3 yp z O l , I ? i , till �44 1 �� ff I � I 4 I I 2ti8-4.. tl l , I 1 I I , �44 I , l , , 1 4 lIr 4 1 �� ff I � I 4 a E �§ E Ugg'E=_ Q jjOOGY>ti O gi iYU ggf• ®®11 Eu M, CL H33\U�fi llJl'JfL1dV i.W.HN'rB7A31G �731rF.7153Q dJ7dS57d'1:='-^•:-�: N33FPJM13 3WL1i3G FSd'NR•Ii�3H3 ! /1 ,r 1 r r J I it it r 1t y Ir Id it ,! 4y i ; J r 1 I 1 1 f r` � �' I r i i � i ' i s �4 Al i oil fr /l f fill �' ,rr t i r J / r I' + �r / r I.f J it T -• ! 7 r r i 'Jit 10 J c ei 32 7r ,y,y K m gg 4 Naa }yip g8 tl 8 �gtlg7 �y Rqi $ < a :� M�� 6 a ;. �s g e f Zrf K a' � e a Ela e 4 ft �ggg z Ss pyp g goy INY 3 bra 7>zaui�¢o oil 4p `�° L.. s# y5y5 R �` 0 H gg� � 6 b Awn ICY ay N qado tC F -OO 6 W �r In go Z rrhh H . FD319�+C# LvhX�ddV hCXLVJdklOd3115 ciM'YY�IFFJ53p dJiV15Tlh�5S3i0Fk1 H331A9t7 3FII1193H$ H33'JtR'I133H5 V 4) 4;6 V 0 y B o S 06 �Y e� 32 7r ,y,y K m gg 4 Naa }yip g8 tl 8 �gtlg7 �y Rqi $ < a :� M�� 6 a ;. �s g e f Zrf K a' � e a Ela e 4 ft �ggg z Ss pyp g goy INY 3 bra s Why Yu H3�l a'gggg oil 4p `�° L.. s# y5y5 R �` 0 H gg� � 6 b Awn ICY 5 -S" s. H � S V 4) 4;6 V 0 y B o S 06 �Y e� H w Zm � to Emmons �j p rF rc v a $ z m d 0 1 FQpi a. f ¢°. N i y s _ LL n os gGii w ...I v M loll z U 2 8 Au7 W �y tu g55i yy PP O VJ pp � k $ kip ➢ Q 6 � d 444444444 H w O Zm � to z V �j p rF rc v a $ z m d 0 1 FQpi a. f ¢°. N i y s _ LL n os gGii w ...I v M z U 2 8 Au7 W �y tu g55i yy PP O VJ pp � k $ kip ➢ Q 6 � d 444444444 O u 0 llj d 7 �j p rF rc v a $ z 0 1 FQpi a. f ¢°. N i T • nMobile • 200 Westgate Parkway, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23233 September 20, 2018 Justin Jones Skyway Towers 3637 Madaca Lane Tampa, FL 33618 RE: Letter of Intent (LOI) to Collocate Proposed Tower Location — Terminus of Split Oak Road, Roanoke County, VA 37" 11' 39.6979", -80" 02' 46.1289" Dear Justin, Thank you for providing us information regarding the proposed tower site located in Roanoke County, VA. T -Mobile's Engineering Team has evaluated the proposed location and determined that this site is of interest for future network enhancement planning. T -Mobile's collocation on this tower is subject to receipt of all necessary governmental permits and both parties entering into a definitive agreement. This LOI is non-binding and does not create or impose any legal obligations upon either party. Please feel contact me if you have any questions. Best reg ds, Juhn L. Louissaint •T•••Mobile®• Virginia Engineering and Operations Manager, Engineering Development juhn.louissaint@t-mobile.com 1010c: TOTALLY COMMITTED: Drew C. Patterson Project Manager Network Building and Consulting, LLC 4435 Waterfront Drive, Suite 100 Glen Allen, VA 23086 September 12, 2018 Attn: Rebecca James, CZA Planner II Roanoke County Community Development 5204 Bernard Drive SW Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Special Use Permit (SUP) Application New Tower at Terminus of Split Oak Road Tax Parcel Id#: 096.01-02-25.00-0000 Dear Ms. James: Enclosed you will find the following materials to support the SUP application filed on behalf of the applicant, Skyway Towers, with respect to their proposed tower at the above referenced address: Application fees: o Check in the amount of $3,200 made payable to The Atlantic Group; a Check in the amount of $150 made payable to Roanoke County One (1) set of the following: o SUP application form; o Applicant's narrative and associated filing materials; © 11" x 17" conceptual site plan and survey. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact Mme at any time. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter.. Sincerely, Dwa, 6. Par&,W" Drew C. Patterson Consultant to Skyway Towers and travelers in the area access to the latest wireless technologies, which is consistent with Implementation Strategy #8. Zoning Ordinance requirements The subject property is zoned AR, Agricultural Residential District. In accordance with the Permitted Use Table in the Zoning Ordinance, broadcasting towers are permitted in the AR District subject to an approved special use permit. Article 4, Section 30-87-2 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates broadcasting towers. The applicable requirements listed in this section are as follows: Sec. 30-87-2. - Broadcasting Tower. (B) Applicability: These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; The proposed tower is a monopole design. b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and The general area of the tower is served by above ground utilities. c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. Duly noted. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. Not applicable; this is a new tower. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. Not applicable; this is a new tower. corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section C.1. above. See attached photo -simulations. 4. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. See attached photo -simulations. 5. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. See attached propagation maps showing the relationship of the proposed tower to T -Mobile's other tower sites within the area. 6. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre -application consultation. A balloon test was conducted on 7118118. The associated photo -simulations show that the tower will have very limited visibility. Specifically, the tower was only visible from two of seventeen locations. The tower was not visible from any of the chosen locations along the Blue Ridge Parkway. 7. Written verification that all required submittals to the PAA as required by section 30-87-2(D)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. The Applicant is required by Federal law to comply with all FAA requirements when constructing a new tower. The Applicant will obtain all required approvals from the FAA and other State and Federal agencies. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre -application conference. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. See attached TOWAIR stating that the tower does not require FAA registration. When constructing a new tower, the Applicant is required by law to comply with all FAA and FCC requirements. The Applicant is currently in the process of obtaining these approvals and can provide the approval documents when complete. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73. The Applicant agrees to comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73, if applicable. 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. The proposed tower will be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendorslproviders of communications services. In addition, the Applicant agrees to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding coirnnunity and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. A monopole tower design is proposed. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre - approved by the board of supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other 4435 Waterfront Drive + Suite 100 + Glen Men, VA 23060 + 804-548-4079 + www.networkbuilding.com n 'f The proposed tower will meet or exceed all special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of the ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. In building out its network, T -Mobile first looks to collocate on existing structures (telecommunications towers, transmission power towers, rooftops, etc.) within a search ring. T -Mobile places a strong emphasis on collocation for two reasons: 1) it is the desire of most local governments and 2) it is typically much cheaper than building a new site. Collocation was not an option for the following reasons: • There are no existing towers within the search ring; • The closest existing tower is approximately 2.4 miles southwest of the proposed site, which is far outside of the needed search area; • The surrounding area is relatively rural with significant topography and there are no existing structures tall enough to meet the coverage objective. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land fon-ns. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The proposed tower will be located at a high elevation; however, there is significant raised topography and foliage between the tower site and the Blue Ridge Parkway that will serve to screen it. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. The Applicant will utilize an existing gravel road to access the facility; therefore, a new entrance will not be required. The Applicant will attempt to use existing utilities if available. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. T -Mobile always prefers to collocate on existing structures; however, there are not any structures within the search ring that are tall enough to meet the coverage objective. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. The attached photo -simulations were created from the balloon test, which was conducted on 7118118. These documents show that the proposed tower was only visible from two (2) of seventeen (17) locations. Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 Informational Notice of Section 106 Filings Date: 09/19/2018 Reference Number: 1006654 To Whom It May Concern Roanoke County Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: FILE NUMBER: 0008370121 TCNS Number: 175751 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 09/18/2018 Applicant: T -Mobile USA Consultant: Environmental Corporation of America Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Roanoke (VA09537) Site Address: Split Oak Road Detailed Description of Project: Site Coordinates: 37-11-39.7 N, 080-02-46.1 W City: Roanoke County: ROANOKE State: VA Lead SHPO/THPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources Consultant Contact Information: Name: Dina Bazzill Title: MA, RPA - Principal Archaeologist PO Box: Address: 1375 Union Hill Industrial Ct. City: Alpharetta State: GA Zip:.30004 Phone: (770) 667-2040 Fax: Email: dina.bazzill@eca-usa.com NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. Page 1 of 1 FCC 813 July 2018 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: February 26, 2019 Ordinance appropriating funds in the amount of $187,000 from County Capital Reserves for fiscal year 2018-2019 for the purpose of providing funding for the County Facilities Assessment Christopher R. Bever Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Appropriation of funds in the amount of $187,000 from Capital Reserves to provide resources to complete the County Facilities Assessment. BACKGROUND: Section 5-3 of the County's Comprehensive Financial Policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 24, 2018 states the County "...shall obtain an independent, professional, and comprehensive facilities assessment to ascertain the present condition of each facility, and to assist the County and the Schools in forecasting capital funding requirements to address deficiencies. The assessment shall also be used to establish priorities for the maintenance, repair, enhancement, or replacement of facilities and their component systems, and to be used in the development of the Capital Maintenance Program and Capital Improvement Program." The assessment is to be performed every seven to ten years. The Board of Supervisors received information regarding the proposed County Facilities Assessment at a February 12, 2019 work session and the presentation from that work session is attached. DISCUSSION: County staff has completed contract negotiations with its preferred vendor and is ready to initiate work on the County Facilities Assessment. The vendor will produce an Page 1 of 2 independent, professional and comprehensive facilities assessment to ascertain the condition, useful life, deficiencies, and cost estimates for County facilities, systems, and major components. The assessment will also provide a resource for the development of priorities and funding requirements for the maintenance, repair, enhancement, or replacement of facilities and their component systems. The assessment will be utilized in the development of future Capital Improvement Programs. The County Facilities Assessment will assess 39 County government facilities totaling over 865,000 square feet; infrastructure and support facilities at 36 Parks, Recreation, and Tourism locations; and other County support facilities such as communication tower sites. Completion of work will result in a comprehensive report that includes all findings, recommendations, and analysis. The deliverables also include a fully customizable capital asset planning and management software application. The software application will provide a tool for staff to update condition metrics based on both work completed or deferred. The reporting platform includes significant reporting capabilities and allows for the update of cost estimating factors. After appropriation of funds and based on a 23 week completion timeline, it is estimated that all work would be completed and deliverables presented in August 2019. County staff would then schedule a work session with the Board of Supervisors to review the results and begin a project and funding prioritization process. Before a contract can be executed and work can begin, an appropriation of funds must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of all work and deliverables associated with the County Facilities Assessment is $170,000. County staff also recommends adding a 10% project contingency, or $17,000 to the total estimated cost. The total appropriation request is for $187,000. County staff recommends utilization of current County Capital Reserves to provide resources for completion of the assessment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance and setting the second reading for March 12, 2019, to appropriate $187,000 from County Capital Reserves for the County Facilities Assessment. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $187,000 FROM COUNTY CAPITAL RESERVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE COUNTY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, Section 5-3 of the Comprehensive Financial Policy directs County staff to obtain "... an independent, professional, and comprehensive facilities assessment to ascertain the present condition of each facility ..." every seven to ten years; and WHEREAS, County staff has completed contract negotiations to complete the initial facilities assessment and held a work session to discuss the facilities assessment with the Board of Supervisors on February 12, 2019; and WHEREAS, funding for completion of the assessment is now being requested by County staff; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance before they are expended; and WHERAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 26, 2019, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 2019. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. That the sum of $187,000 is hereby appropriated from Capital Reserves for fiscal year 2018-2019 for the purpose of providing funding for the County Facilities Assessment. 2. This ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 1 N a--+ U •U O a_ ca 'U ro C: iz 00= N a--+ Ln O � U a--+ C: Ca 'U ro Ln > C: .N .a) C U ate-+ C: O E_ E 5 O C: cn O ca � • � c: E .- .-C:cn -0 m C: vi Q OU E Q ate-+ C: C Ln 4-0 c: •- � � U C: O ca cn E � U � � Ln E °LnLn a ca a� U C: 4-0 M C: C: W ate-+ C: O E O O � � U c � O O C: .O E U U v � O � ca � ate-+ ca i a--+ U 4-0 Ca O U bz •� E � Ca C bz O a- � M C: w .O E a--+ a) N i a--+ 0 •O E +-+ O •� •� U ca � w4-0� .- w � � U 00 � Q 0 i w O d1 m O _(A ca E LnL N Ln a Ln O V O 54 O V i c .O V c (3) �--� '- i o W � � ® U cr O N LL- ou E a--+ O O O U �U E� "0E O E .V }' > E O EV c:p a--+ O i +� CLn . E }' •� co 0 a- co n U E � L C: C: C ' O w +, Ln O EC: u Ln � Ln �o W .o w (v— O + ;> = cn +� V a"' N 0 • — Ln O O C� E a� •O 4� E +, O Q CL +, bA 0• – ca W -0 o (3) (3)>- — i > cr `~ O cin O4 i N ca cn O E (B c: C: > O.� O Q> > V c m E " Ln — Q� E— cn CO Ln -0 u _ 0 Zj -0 o 0 N•- (3) oz— �' > :3cca r1 w 0 Q > LL 4- CL R LU E O � � • buo O ' CO 7 U l°1J` �iI . CL O E S.... co CL V) O V bA O V '— • (3) c • • •V U O •� v _Ike V •> c E w W L >' — v V O V — ca N Ln O U CL O —� O O � � CO O N co (3) C n (.0 m v c =) +� W o 00 00 m O O lD O r -I i' 0 z `-' O+ O O O M o � � CW G 4- U W U a--+ O i C: i a 0E .7 E .A C: (/) ni O 0 N O N U E N U N C6 O O 0 • • O+ m O O M o � � 4- U N O i C: i a 0E .7 E .A C: (/) ni O 0 N O N U E N U N C6 O O 0 • • O O O O . Ecr U U C: • C: i ., 4_+ U O N O —_ 04- i LL U cn O ca S O Q U J i C: i a 0E .7 E .A C: (/) ni O 0 N O N U E N U N C6 O O 0 • • V LL m .Mo O L ma , E � m L 0 N m L N Q N L - m LL 07 O Li- Ln Ln N cn N \ N p 00 N E 16 +' O `Ll O C O O 4A n `}Ln u O L O ++ L O 2 1 -0 �:m -0fB o0 o _0 =33 Ln U O U a L ++ U v cn 4-0 C1A O N QA N ON M W LL O _0 W m d Q = N t1A LU Q V LL =o a J 4-.� O E N L/)O O o Lr T=����� +' (10\ `� _N Q cn O Q NL N L N E U O `n a+ N �+ a� Q a+ Eu N ate+ Ln 0 N _0 iii U `� cB cB N O O a, C: O to = i N � U N L LL a� �3 N 0 N �_ > 0 Q O ++ U 0 Q LL 0;6 QU LL Mo L 3 4a ,L O00 4�A 0 ON LL cn 0 O Ln 2 Ln +_' U cB X06 U N +�+ O Q N fB c 3 H N }, cn ate+ bb L + N N Q 0 � o U a+ u N i J LU Q 2 Q N a -+ Q N > (U E Ln N N Q 0 E N N N Q >- i u U 0 LL— L fB O cO I Ln N 70 > O a+ N O U O a+ L cB N �+ 3 1,0LL (n LL LU J Q Ln d t1A Q V LL =o a J 4-.� O E N L/)O O o Lr T=����� +' (10\ `� _N Q cn O Q NL N L N E U O `n a+ N �+ a� N Q) `n 4j L1A m N N T a+ Eu N ate+ Ln 0 N _0 iii U `� cB cB N O O a, C: O to = i N � U N L LL a� �3 N 0 N �_ > 0 Q O ++ U 0 A ) S J 2 ƒ % 2 0 } § ) % J © } )a § ® \ o u a_ CL 5: e ) - , ILk � ] � )o } LU L / _ a 2 � a ƒ � / b ■. � � •) kc f; t m !� &a � � ƒ ( L % 0 S E $) U. . \ o u - CL 5: % � L w �— w C U L N C L C y O y ± C b C a L -a L 1 &O Q E E w _0 — o2 w 3:L cu O w m y Q E E o L U U C L > c LL O M- m O m a O cn o CL c 3 E — 41 rn°°' m *' c w C N 41 • o o W N a% E L w N E E c N W a o _0 -0 ca 4, a E c ti 41 o Lo y >• o ,� O N oc m m w w t c a & C 41 w O L O o u m c +>+ c w m '� 4� y m Q cc O T O W ai m E _ }� � _ � _ L m M L 0> 41 NC m C m C T O m U O i L m E • C a+ di ++U w i, C3 i, U C N N M " LL a ,� E — C C C c a i G1 c a m G1 C i '� L m .� L O o L O L O O L O a 'L l70 i+ i+ m 41 m 'L L 'L L 'L N r > L m m m L 41 p L OO 'L •L y CL L ' CL L ' Q• N C � w � � � ,E .� +1 +1 oy 1 w 1 41 41 41 Z., 2 m O 41 O O C C CL O O O O O '� LL Vf o 2 2 2 2 2 �— U C U C C C y y y ± b O N L L L E E E w _0 — C: O �— U C U C r -I ca O W C6 DC b O N o N Q _0 — C: O -J U o U O cn O ao W N a% • — > N ca b N o N >-b.0 _0.�_ U O cn N U O cn _0 -0 ca Q `~ J i �p N _0 N O N N ca .E ca E N N J � � � Ln O � — au W ai m E _ C6 U U 0 0 i� y L N ' ] EFS f 06 Q p L Q� Q� Q� }, •� a••r Vf s �O U C6 U ate-+ •� —o C O U O - N b.0 U � (n Q - N •Ua.:, N N •� cn � 41 cn E cn N p Q O N •L O •L "w p p CSA `� N U LL O N Vf V w L O LL -0 cn —0 4-J UO m 3 - F O L N 06 Q p L Q� Q� Q� }, •� a••r Vf 4-J C: Q E U a••+ U L }' `� �O U C6 U ate-+ •� —o C O U O - N b.0 U � (n Q - N •Ua.:, N N •� cn � 41 cn E cn N p Q O N •L O •L "w p p CSA `� N U LL O N Vf V w L O LL -0 cn —0 4-J UO m 3 - N O ClA i •a m 4-J .0 � N • t1b 0 �O 0 a••+ > (n N a� 0- N Vf ate•+ O a••+ 0 U w — p (n L Q O U cn GJ 4-J cr C6 a i cn N L (n co a co O Q LU L L- 0 O i O !uA .C: .X LU O Q co PEW i O Q O L O Q Q n, VJ .O V 'U N n _O U (n co a co O Q LU L L- 0 O i O !uA .C: .X LU O Q co PEW i O Q 'U N 'U N N bio ca ca G ca N N U � � ' cuE > ca z 4-J O O O _ a C 4-1 I a O 4-J N (n co a co O Q LU L L- 0 O i O !uA .C: .X LU O Q co PEW i O Q i C: E V O .a V U � Ec: O O 0 V O O a� 00 V r -I � -(/�- X � O O � .O -0 Q 0-0 Q C� C: (3) 4f o aV m N Q E O V 0 V Q) V 0 W O +j ca � .2-0 V N -1-i 1 C L � O � �a d1 � r -I � 0-0 O Q U (/) c 2 -0 O (3) U .i L � C O V o �CL �E O CO V R ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Ordinance amending sections of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance dealing with sign regulations Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator First reading of an ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND: The proposed amendments to the County's sign regulations were initiated to comply with the Supreme Court decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert, AZ. DISCUSSION: During 2018, the Planning Commission and staff have been working on amendments to the County's sign regulations. As part of the process, staff utilized the Virginia Local Government Attorneys (LGA) model ordinance and researched other Virginia localities ordinances. The Planning Commission held several work sessions in the spring and summer of 2018 on the amendments. The proposed amendments include revisions (additions, deletions, or modifications) to the following sections: Definitions (30-28); Purpose (30-93-1); Exempted Signs (30-93- 3); Prohibited Signs (30-93-4); Temporary Signs (30-93-8); Damaged or Neglected Signs (30-93-12); and District Regulations (30-93-13). On July 19, 2018, the proposed amendments were emailed to interested stakeholders and local sign companies. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Page 1 of 2 proposed amendments on September 4, 2018. No citizens spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed amendments to the County's Zoning Ordinance regarding sign regulations. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no funding issue on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of the ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and schedule the public hearing and second reading for March 12, 2019. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE AMENDING ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE II, SECTION 30-28, DEFINITIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted the County Zoning Ordinance, including definitions to be applied and since the enactment of that Ordinance, judicial guidance and best practices for local governments warrant changes to the County Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed and vetted through work sessions of the Planning Commission and input from stakeholders; and WHEREAS, the proposed revisions are consistent with judicial mandates and best practices; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 26, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on March 12, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended as follows: SEC. 30-28. DEFINITIONS. (C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section shall have the meanings described below. Page 1 of 18 A oigR appliGd tG GlGth, PaPGF, fl ible PlaGtin nr fabFin of aRY LiAPI AAAI gene" ate ed—tG be d+splaye�'�temnnrar„ basi A temporary sign of flexible materials affixed to a framework or flat surface. Illegal signs: A sign erected without a required permit or which otherwise does not comply with any provisions of this Ordinance. Minor sign: A permanent wall mounted or freestanding sign not exceeding three (3) square feet in area, not exceeding four (4) in height, and not illuminated. Public art: Items expressing creative skill or imagination in a visual form, such as painting or sculpture, which are intended to beautify or provide aesthetic influences to public areas which are visible from the public realm. Sign: r,rnd„n+ gor"ino nr aGtivity. Any object, device, display, or structure, or part thereof, visible from a public right-of-way open to use by the general public which is designed and used to attract attention to an institution, organization, business, product, service, event, or location by any means involving words, letters, Page 2 of 18 figures, design, symbol, fixtures, logos, colors, illumination, or projected images. The term does not include public art, architectural elements incorporated into the style or function of a building, or flags of any nation, state, or other geopolitical entity. The term "sign" also does not include the display of merchandise for sale on the site or the display. Sign face: The portion of a sign structure bearing the message. Temporary sign when layorl�rac�lrc�r'rarrcwv4+ haer-- . A sign constructed of cloth, canvas, vinyl, paper, plywood, fabric, or other lightweight material not well suited to provide a durable substrate or, if made of some other material, is neither permanently installed in the ground nor permanently affixed to a building or structure which is permanently installed in the ground. ARTICLE V — DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEC. 30-93. SIGNS. Sec. 30-93-1. Purpose. Finding, purpose and intent; interpretation. Page 3 of 18 (A) Signs obstruct views, distract motorists, displace alternative uses for land, and pose other problems that legitimately call for regulation. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the size, color, illumination, movement, materials, location, height and condition of all signs places on private property for exterior observation, thus ensuring the protection of property values, the character of the various neighborhoods, the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community, protection against destruction of or encroachment upon historic areas, and the safety and welfare of pedestrians and wheeled traffic while providing convenience to citizens and encouraging economic development. This ordinance allows adequate communication through signage while encouraging aesthetic quality in the design, location, size and purpose of all signs. This ordinance shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. If any provision of this article is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such finding shall not affect the validity of other provisions of this article which can be given effect without the invalid provision. (B) Signs not expressly permitted as being allowed by right or by special use permit under this ordinance, by specific requirements in another portion of this ordinance, or otherwise expressly allowed by the Board of Supervisors are forbidden. (C) A sign places on land or on a building for the purpose of identification, protection or directing persons to a use conducted therein shall be deemed to be an integral but accessory and subordinate part of the principal use of land or building. Therefore, the intent of this ordinance is to establish limitations on signs in order to ensure they are appropriate to the land, building or use to which they are appurtenant and are adequate for their intended purpose while balancing the individual and community interests identified in subsection (A) of this section. Page 4 of 18 (D) These regulations are intended to promote signs that are compatible with the use of the property to which they are appurtenant, landscape and architecture of surrounding buildings, are legible and appropriate to the activity to which they pertain, are not distracting to motorists, and are constructed and maintained in a structurally sound and attractive condition. (E) These regulations distinguish between portions of the County designed for primarily vehicular access and portions of the County designed for primarily pedestrian access. (F) These regulations do not regulate every form and instance of visual speech that may be displayed anywhere within the jurisdictional limits of the County. Rather, they are intended to regulate those forms and instances that are most likely to meaningfully affect one or more of the purposed set forth above. (G) These regulations do not entirely eliminate all of the harms that may be created by the installation and display of signs. Rather, they strike an appropriate balance that preserves ample channels of communication by means of visual display while still reducing and mitigating the extent of the harms caused by signs. Sec. 30-93-3. Exempted Signs. (A) The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within the county without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service: O#inial nc �r cimil�r r I� y `-GVOGoc OGIontifiGatir\n rliranti�n�l 1 . cmTct}car, r�ri ,.,,,� e�Tcrt$r�cTcvrcca�cTcrrmTccrcrvrr, �rrcccrvrrc�T ���ti-F fi$ RCd , G FG Gtcc " n rl m i n } ` cTti tcc`�r PYGVeFRM'_QA+71 I,,,,_". Signs erected by a governmental body or required by law. Page 5 of 18 �2. Street address signs, not exceeding ten (10) square feet in size. 443. Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-way; are erected or constructed in accordance with the structural and safety requirements of the building code, if applicable; are not located in the sight distance triangle at a road intersection; do not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian travel; and do not obstruct the view of the property street address and street name. 4-3-4. Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in sections 30-93-4(A)5. and 7., which shall not be excluded. Page 6 of 18 5. Temporary signs as follows: a. Any signs no more than 96 square feet, located on property where a building permit is active. b. On any property for sale, rent or lease in residential and agricultural zoned districts, one of more signs with a total area up to 32 square feet in total size. All other zoning districts shall be limited up to 60 square feet in size. c. Official notices or advertisements posted or displayed by or under the direction of any public or court officer in the performance of his official or directed duties; provided, that all such signs shall be removed no more than ten (10) days after their purpose has been accomplished. d. On residential zoned property, one or more, temporary signs with a total area of no more than 16 square feet, and which are removed within 30 days of being erected. 6. Not more than two minor signs per parcel. Additional minor signs are permitted in certain districts with a permit. Sec. 30-93-4. Prohibited Signs. (A) The following signs are prohibited within the county: 1 Signs simulating, or which are likely to be confused with, a traffic control sign or any other sign displayed by a public authority. Any sign is subject to immediate removal and disposal by an authorized County official as a nuisance. Page 7 of 18 RIM ITAMPH Any sign or portion thereof that rotates, or otherwise moves through the use of electrical or wind power. This prohibition does not include the changing of messages on electronic message boards. Signs advertising activities or products that are illegal under federal, state, or county law. Any sign that obstructs any building door, window, or other means of egress. 49- Any electrical sign that does not display the UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC label, unless such sign is constructed, installed, and inspected in accordance with section 30-93-9(B). 44-10. Signs or sign structures that are erected on, or extend over, a piece of property without the expressed written permission of the property owner or the owner's agent. 411. Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering a public right-of-way from private property. 44-12. Portable signs. 44-13. Roof signs. 45-14. Any temporary sign(s) displayed on a stationary motor vehicle or trailer when the vehicle or trailer is parked or oriented for the purpose of serving the function of a sign, except when such vehicle or trailer is parked in the operator's driveway or when the vehicle is parked to the side or rear of a commercial building and is not visible from adjacent public roads or is loading or unloading. Sec. 30-93-8. Temporary Signs. (A) Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant to section 30-93-5 and 30-93-15. FYGE?pt aG PFGVidGd in o ihoon+i�no /R\ and (Q) be W, ne tai tG read-esf�t�-a+�'�,-r__t9.A.S;t.FI_IGt+snGig„s, tTemporary signs shall comply with the following standards: 4- Each business or non-residential use on a lot shall be allowed to display one (1) temporary sign at any time during a calendar year. Any temporary sign secured to a temporary fixture or post must meet the minimum sign setback, per Section 30- 93-15, from the property line, adjacent to the right-of-way. Each business or non - Page 8 of 18 residential use wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a temporary sign permit. Temporary sign permits shall expire at the end of each calendar year. Sec. 30-93-12. Damaged or Neglected Signs. (A) The building commissioner of county shall have the authority to order the removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses a sear immediate and imminen danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. (B) All signs shall be constructed and mounted in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (C) All signs and components thereof shall be maintained in good repair and in a safe, neat and clean condition. (D) The owner of any advertising sign, other than a permitted off -premises sign, located on commercial property where the use or business has ceased operating shall, within 60 days of the cessation of use or business operation, replace the sign with a blank face until such time as a use or business has resumed operating on the property. Page 9 of 18 (E) Any sign which becomes a safety hazard of which is not kept in a reasonably good state of repair shall be put in a safe and good state of repair within 30 days of a written notice to the owner and permit holder. (F) Any sign which constitutes a nuisance may be abated by the County of Roanoke under the requirements of Virginia Code §§ 15.2-900, 15.2-906, and/or 15.2-1115. Sec. 30-93-13. District Regulations. Page 10 of 18 Page 11 of 18 Page 12 of 18 Page 13 of 18 Page 14 of 18 Page 15 of 18 Generally, signage regulations, including allowable square footage, maximum number of signs, minimum setback and height, based on zoning districts, shall comply with the following table Maximum total square footage based on road frontage: District Type Permitted Size (each/total s.f. max) Maximum Sign Area Minimum Setback Maximum Height Location Temporary 1 maximum/ 32 s.f. 32 s.f. AG -3 5 feet 15 feet Freestanding and or Attached AG -1 0.25 s.f per 1 I.f. Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet of lot or Attached frontage Page 16 of 18 Page 17 of 18 Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/32 s.f. 32 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet or Attached AV 1 s.f. per Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/400 s.f. 1 Lf. of lot 5 feet 15 feet or Attached frontage Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/ 32 s.f. 32 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet AR, R- or Attached 1, R-2, R-3, R- 4 and 0.5 s.f. R -MH per 1 Lf. Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet of lot or Attached frontage Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/ 60 s.f. 60 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet or Attached C-1, C- 2, 1-1 and 1-2 1.5 s.f. Proposed: per 1 I.f. **See **See Freestanding Permanent Options 5 maximum/500 s.f. of lot Below: Options or Attached frontage Below: Options for sign setbacks and height in the C-1, C-2, 1-1 and 1-2 zoned districts: Option 1 **This option can only be used in the freestanding sign meets the definition of a monument sign, per Section 30-28. Minimum sign setback from front property line: five (5) feet. Maximum sign height: seven (7) feet. Option 2 Minimum sign setback from front property line: ten (10) feet. Page 17 of 18 Maximum sign height: fifteen (15) feet. Option 3 Minimum sign setback from front property line: fifteen (15) feet. Maximum sign height: twenty-five (25) feet. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet of signage. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 18 of 18 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Open district appointments. BACKGROUND: 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District) The following District appointments remain open: Cave Spring Magisterial District Vinton Magisterial District Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (At -Large) Two open appointments 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2017: a) Steve Anderson, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District is eligible for reappointment Leon McGhee has resigned from the EDA effective February 1, 2019. This is a four- year term and will not expire until September 26, 2021. Page 1 of 2 3. Library Board (appointed by District) The following District appointment remains open: Vinton Magisterial District FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 26, 2019, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — November 7, 2018 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Arrowhead Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation System 4. Resolution requesting acceptance of Lawson Lane of Belmont Section I into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 5. Resolution requesting acceptance of Leighburn Drive of Buckland South into the Virginia Department of Transportation System 6. Resolution requesting acceptance of Matthew Drive, Adam Drive and Spring Grove Drive of Edgefield Subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 7. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Edwin R. "Randy" Leach, Commonwealth's Attorney, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Confirmation of appointment BACKGROUND: Mr. W. William "Bill" Gust's four-year appointment on the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission expired February 10, 2019. DISCUSSION: It is the consensus of the Board to recommend reappointment of Mr. Gust to an additional four-year term to expire February 10, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of the above appointment. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Resolution requesting acceptance of Arrowhead Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation System Tarek Moneir Acting Director of Development Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept Arrowhead Trail of Cherokee Hills Section 4 subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation System. BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke is requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept, as described by the AM -4.3, 0.25 (See attachment "A") miles of Arrowhead Trail from the intersection with Sundance Rd (VA SEC. Route # 1160) to its cul-de-sac. This road is located within Cherokee Hills Section 4 subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District. See attached Exhibit "A" for exact location. DISCUSSION: The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The road has been deemed acceptable for inclusion in the VDOT system. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 t Attachment "A";r ■Lr 1�.; y�. CO1I MONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 South Broad Street STEPHEN C. BRICH SALEM, VA 24153 COMMISSIONER January 16, 2019 Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Voice: Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax: Subject: Surety and Fees Needed for Street Additions in Cherokee Hills Section 4 County of Roanoke Please be advised that the streets shown on the attached 'Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance are satisfactory and eligible to be accepted as part of the secondary system of state highways. After receiving your surety, applicable fees, and any outstanding items listed on the attached'Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets,' we will notify the local authorities of those facts and confirm the agenda item for the acceptance of these streets by the governing body at their meeting, scheduled for February 26, 2019. Their resolution initiates the final steps required for VDOT to accept these streets and begin maintenance. Based on the date of the local governing body's meeting indicated above, the Department has determined a surety expiration date and the amounts required for surety, maintenance payment, and administrative cost recovery fee as shown at the top of the attached 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance.' If surety is required, your surety provider may, at their option, list these streets within the body of the document or incorporate the attached list of streets in their document by reference. For your convenience, pre -approved surety forms are attached. Please note that if all necessary documents and monies are not received by the end of business February 12, 2019, the necessary resolution by the governing body may be deferred, a new final inspection may be required, and the amount of the fees may be adjusted. We encourage you to avoid such delays and any potential increase in costs associated with the acceptance of these streets by delivering all outstanding items and fees to this office as soon as possible. y krian.leviZs,P. . Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use Salem Residency Attachments Cc: Alex Chaney, E.I.T. -- Roanoke County Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets In order for VDOT to notify the County that the streets in the subject subdivision are ready to be accepted by the Department for maintenance, please be advised that the developer is responsible for providing the following documents, or assuring they have been provided, to VDOT before the date of the Board of Supervisors meeting. ❑ Bond, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement or Cash Bond as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance, provided to the residency office and NOT to Richmond. ❑ Maintenance Fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ Administrative Cost Recovery fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ An executed copy of any prescribed County -State Agreement for all County controlled grade separation structures (24 VAC 30-91-110.J) Crossings of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.x.1) PE certification regarding hydraulic design and construction of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.2) Stormwater management impoundments receiving run-off from a roadway (24 VAC 30-91-1101) Railroad crossings (24 VAC 30-91-110.M.4.b) ❑ Permits for any non-compliant sidewalk, bicycle, and/or shared use path facility impacting the dedicated right- of-way (24 VAC 30-91-110.1.2) ❑ Quitclaims of all prior easements that conflict with the dedicated right-of-way. ❑ "Remain in Place" permits from all utility companies and for all facilities impacting dedicated rights-of-way. ❑ Two (2) normal size copies of the recorded subdivision plat for all sections. ❑ Two (2) copies of the recorded plat reduced to 11 inches X 17 inches. ❑ One (1) fully annotated and clearly readable sketch of the subdivision layout, providing a realistic representation of the street network, with north arrow, on paper not less than 8.5 inches by 11 inches and not greater than 11 inches by 17 inches. (See example provided) ❑ One (1) copy of the approved road plans and one copy of the road plans in electronic format (or 2 paper copies). ❑ One (1) set of detailed design and one (1) set of as -built plans for all bridges and culverts providing a contiguous opening of more than 36 square feet. Note: Some counties have adopted a county wide comprehensive storm water management agreement with VDOT that may relieve the requirement of providing such an agreement. Contact the residency's land development or permit section to determine if a such an agreement is required for your subdivision. 1/18/2019 Page f of I Mr. Developer: Typically, VDOT sees one of the four forms of Surety listed below. Enclosed you will find a partially completed Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement, and Performance Bond that your financial institution may find helpful. The terms of these documents have been reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General and approved for use as a guidance document. If none of these customary forms of surety covering new subdivision streets is acceptable to you, VDOT will consider your proposal of an alternative form of surety. Non-interest bearing cash bond paid to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation Letter of Credit (usually issued by a commercial lending institution) Escrow Agreement (Note: VDOT does not act as a "Trustee.") Performance Bond (usually issued by a commercial bonding or insurance company) SURETY ADDENDUM Instructions Page Provide this page, the Surety Addendum and Sample Surety Documents to Developer Printed by VDOT on: January 16, 2019 Mr. Developer: Provide this document along with the Surety Addendum and the sample surety documents provided by VDOT to the institution that you expect to issue your Surety. Please be advised that the Surety Addendum must be incorporated within the Surety by reference or otherwise the Surety must identify the County, the subdivision and list the streets covered within the Surety document. To be acceptable, the Surety must be capable of being drawn at a counter within the Commonwealth of Virginia or, if the streets covered are in a county contiguous with a boardering state, at a counter in either the Commonwealth of Virginia or the bordering state. Please note that you are responsible for paying by Cashier's Check the amounts indicated on the Surety Addendum as Maintenance Fee and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. These amounts may be combined in one check. Surety Issuer• The Surety Addendum may be Incorporated by reference within the body of your Surety document by citing the name of the Subdivision, the name of the locality, and resolution date. Otherwise, in addition to that information, a listing of streets, termini and lengths must be Included within the body of your Surety document. Surety must be delivered to the following address: 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument , Issued Name of Institution issuing surety Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 SURETY ADDENDUM Surety and Fees Data for the Street Inventory Listed Below Surety Exp'ration Amount of Surety Inspection Fee Admin Cost Recovery Fee 3;31.,2020 $10,000.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 Total Lane Miles for Fees 0.50 V10 wile Factor 5 The dollar amounts shown in the table titled "Fees and Surety for the Street Additions Listed Below" were calculated in accordance with §24 VAC 30-91-140 of VDOT's Subdivision Street Requirements 'SSRsi. The amounts are based on the following described inspection approach and the listed inventory of streets proposed for acceptance in the captioned subdivision. The fee amounts reported here govern over those in Appendix 1 of the Subdivision Street Requirements, which is illustrative and presumes standard VDOT inspection. The Surety Expiration date, if shown, is {a} the earliest surety expiration date acceptable to VDOT, (b) based on the date of the Local Government's resolution requesting VDOT to accept the streets, and (c) may includes a processing period for VDOT's final acceptance. Surety and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee is based on the following: Standard VDOT inspection procedures were used. Costs associated with intermittent VDO— inspections are recovered under the standard fee structure for the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance Project or Subdivision: Cherokee Hills Section 4 Locality and Anticipated County of Roanoke Resolution Date: February 26, 2019 Route Street Name Termini Description and Length Lanes: Median Fee Lane Number Type: Lanes Miles 1409 Arrowhead Trail From. Intersection with S-.jndance Road/Route 1160 To: r 1 2 End of Q.l-de-sac on Arrowhead Trail, Length (mi): 0.25 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument _ _ , Issued Name of Institution issuing surety Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Irrevocable Letter of Credit For Subdivision Streets to be Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Beneficiary; Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: Please send this document to the MOT Office located at: Maintenance Division Salem 1401 East Broad Street I 714 S. Broad St. Richmond, Virginia 23219 Salem, VA 24153 Developer, Fralin Companies 080 Cherokee Hills Sectlon 4 Address: PO Box 20066 s � Subdivision C ty, State, Zipcode Roanoke, VA 24018 County of Roanoke 2/26/2019 Locality and Date to the GovemIng Body's Resolution Issuing Bank: Bank Number Address Letter of Credit No, City, State, Zipcode Issue Date Expiration Date Amount (US Dollars) +."..."......++••++.......... Ten Thousand Dollars And No Cents 10000 000 We hereby open this letter of credit in the amount shown above for the above named Developer in favor of the Virginia Department of Transportation. These funds shall be available by your sight draft signed by the VDOT Residency Administrator or his representative stating that the draw is for the specific purpose of recovering all loss, cost, damage or expense incurred to correct faulty workmanship or materials associated with the construction of one or more streets and/or related drainage facilities listed on the attached VDOT document entitled "Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance" identified below for the Subdivision in the Locality named above. All sight drafts made pursuant to this instrument shall bear the clause "Drawn under (Institution's Name and Address) for Letter of Credit No. , Issued _ Expiring , in the amount of $ We hereby engage with you that drafts in compliance with these terms shall be duly honored. This letter of credit becomes operative and will expire at our counters on the dates first written above. Except as expressly stated herein, this credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Cred,ts (1993 Revision, as amended), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. (Authorized Signature) (Panted Name) (Title) (Asset} SEAL Attachment: 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance,' dated:l?1612019 The Virginia Department of Transportation will accept this document duplicated on a financial mstttutron's stationery or the institution's standard letter of credit formai, provided all of the information and terms cited above are included. PERFORMANCE BOND A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: This document;,, -o be provided to the Benefir cry's Off ce Iocated at Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 Locality 1 County of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Cherokee Hills Section 4 Locality's Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 2/26/2019 """"""""'"""""'"""'""'"*"'"'""" Ten Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $10,000.00 3/31/2020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, that above named Principal, and the above named Bonding Company (hereinafter "Surety) are held and firmly bound unto the Commonwealth of Virginia in the full and just sum shown above as "Amount of Surety," current money of the United States, to be paid upon demand to the said Commonwealth of Virginia, to which payment thereof we hereby bind ourselves, each of us, and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with our seals and dated this day of WHEREAS, the Principal has constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled "Surety Addendum", and the Commonwealth, acting through the Department of Transportation, anticipate accepting the inventory -of streets shown thereon for maintenance as part of the VDOT maintained secondary system of state highways. NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such that the Principal shall, for a period not less than one year, following the date of the Locality's Resolution and ending on the date of expiration c -ted above, indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia from all loss, cost, damage, or expense incurred in the repair of said streets, including the drainage facilities pertaining to said streets, and to persons and property lawfully on such streets occasioned by defective materials and/or workmanship. This obligation shall remain in full force and effect through the expiration date cited above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and Surely have caused these presents to be executed and their seals affixed the day and year first above written. Signature of Principal ;Fralin Companies'. Witness: Typed or Printed Name ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF to wit: a notary public in the State and City/County aforesaid, do certify that (Name) . (Title) a duty authorized representative of the'Principal (Developer)', appeared before me and acknowledged iha foregoing instrument this day of NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Note: An original copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12101/2007 A Surety [Performance Bond) for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Tfansportation Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Cherokee Hills Section 4 Bonding Company: Signature of Attorney -in -Fact: Countersigned: Typed or Printed Name Resident Virginia Agent AFFIDAVIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SURETY STATEICOMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF to wit: a notary public in the State and City, -County aforesaid, do certify that (Name) , (Title) , an Officer of the forenamed Surety, did appear before me and make oath that he is duly authorized to execute the foregoing bond by virtue of a certain power of attorney of said company, dated the day of , and recorded in the Clerk's Office o1 the in/as , that said power of attorney has not been revoked; that the said company has complied with all the requirements of law regulating the admission of such companies to transact business in the Commonwealth of Virginia; that the said company holds the certificate of the Commissioner of Insurance authorizing it to do business of the Commonwealth of Virginia: that i1 has a paid up cash capital of not less than $250,000; that the paid up capital, plus the surplus and undivided profits of said company, is $ ; that the penalty of the foregoing bond is not in excess of ten per centum of said sum; that the said company is not by said bond incurring in the aggregate, on behalf or on account to the principal named in said bond, a liability for an amount larger than one tenth of its paid up capital, plus its surplus and undivided profits; that the said company is solvent and fully able to meet promptly all its obligations, and the said Officer thereupon, in the name and on behalf of the said company, acknowledged the foregoing writing as its act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Page 2 of 2 Note: An origina copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12/01/2007 ESCROW AGREEMENT A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation issuer; This document is tc be provided to tr.e Be,7ohc,ary's Of+ice located at Salem, 714 S. Broad St„ Salem, VA 24153 Locality Countv of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Cherokee Hills Section 4 Locality's Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 2/26/2019 .............................*** Ten Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $10,000.00 3/31/2020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of and between the above named Developer, party of the first part, and" , by , hereinafter called "Trustee", party of the second part, and the Virginia Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "Commonwealth", party of the third part." WITNESS: WHEREAS, the plat for the above named Subdivision is recorded in the above named Locality of Virginia, within which Developer constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled 'Surety Addendum,' which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Developer is required to provide Surety against any defects in workmanship and/or materials used in the construction of the streets in the above subdivision and included on the'Surety Addendum' for a period of one (1) year following the date of the Locality's Resolution date and expiring, as shown above; and WHEREAS, for the term of this Escrow Agreement, the Commonwealth has agreed that the Developer may deposit the above indicated Amount of Surety in escrow to cover costs incurred by the Virginia Department of Transportation to correct defects due to faults in workmanship or materials used in the construction of the streets described in the attached Surety Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the following terms and conditions, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 Developer has deposited with Trustee, and Trustee by the execution hereof acknowledges that he holds the above listed Amount of Surety under the terms of this agreement. 2 Trustee shall immediately place and maintain the above listed Amount of Surety with the Financial Institution named above in an interest bearing account conditioned to allow withdrawal of all or part of the funds by the Trustee at any time without penalty, until the expiration date cited above. 3 In the event the Commonwealth, in its sole discretion, deems it necessary to perform any work, including labor, use of equipment, or materials to correct defects in workmanship and/or materials used by the Developer in the construction of said streets during the period this Escrow Agreement is in force, either by its own forces or by contract, Trustee shall disburse to the Commonwealth within five (5) days of receipt of written demand such sum or sums for such work from the Amount of Surety stated above. 4 The Trustee shall pay any sum remaining in said account to the Developer not sooner than one (1) day after the Surety Expiration Date cited above, at which time this Escrow Agreement shall terminate. A Surety (Escrow Agreement) for the Addition of Streets to the Secondary System of State Highways. Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Cherokee Hills Section 4 Witness the following signatures and seals: Principal (Fralin Companies) Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) , a duly authorized representative of [Developer], party of the first part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Trustee Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) , "Trustee", party of the second part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this _ day of , NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner or Authorized Representative Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) , "Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner or authorized representative", party of the third part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of , NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Page 2 of 2 In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing body adopted February 26, 2019 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system ofstate highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Officiah: Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change- New subdivrsion street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 5trest Name and/or ftpute Number §33.2-705 Arrowhead Trail, State Route Number 1409 Old Route Number 0 ... -------------------------------------------- • From Intersection with Sundance Road. -Route 1160 To End of Cul-de-sac on Arrowhead Trail, a distance of. 0.25 miles. Recordat on Reference- Instrument #2005-12202 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VD01 Form AM -4.3 (V20,'2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: February 26, 2019 Page 1 of 1 at Exhibit "A" rr Sym o� *JIM NORTH IAT 34 .6 — �i�h. ` -20. 64.386 ACRES aaoaa� W4 ar a .. Ff 1= a a ml "F:' I 1 ` • a�4 205 ACRES RENA619J0 1,a a� yLar " r I ,K4w- — — „.:t 1 i 1 1 Jnr m LOT 31 'Ntt1 1 mfr cans 1 / 4uras1 UYF Rno ic ROWHEI! - wr b na+ 1 1 a pm k R 1 Lar M Az rq aaaa we 75W 4. -s4tk 1 ... : .8+ 9s, s $11 y 1 iwa� 1 Lane � " fat sa LOTH as K a �ro�. �+, \\+ ` LOT >..e ,�,a /- A Lar « LM at LOT ,. �a �'a� + maaa �' I wru a; w 1 < afor as wr a bAL wr a PROPOSED ADDITION(S) SHOWN IN BLUE RIGHT ROADWAY DESCRIPTION LENGTH OF WAY WIDTH SERVICES Miles Feet Feet Houses Arrowhead Trail fr ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF ARROWHEAD TRAIL INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY DEVIOPMENT SCONDARY SYSTEM om the intersection with Sundance Rd (VA SEC. Route # 1160) to the cube -sac. 0.25 50 28 21 ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF ARROWHEAD TRAIL INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY DEVIOPMENT SCONDARY SYSTEM AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF ARROWHEAD TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of State highways, pursuant to §33.2-705 of the Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Resolution requesting acceptance of Belmont Section I into the Virginia Transportation Secondary System Tarek Moneir Acting Director of Development Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Lawson Lane of Department of Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept Lawson Lane of Belmont Section I Subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation System.. BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke is requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution that the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept, as described by the AM -4.3, (See Attachment "A") 0.16 mile of Lawson Lane from the intersection with Mountain View Rd (VA SEC. Route # 651) to its cul-de-sac. This road is located within Belmont Section I subdivision in the Vinton Magisterial District. See attached Exhibit "A" for exact location. DISCUSSION: The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The road has been deemed acceptable for inclusion in the VDOT system. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit "A" °!& �? if SITE �S v� wT p1 / -20.395 ACRES ivOf IG ♦ --mow /T /j 1 es.ms Acres rAuc .. ,^'; i• / '1) 1 LOT it �2y §ht' I� ♦ :.� �` �IK u Ls LOT a ' wit 1 rit it 1LOT n 1 11� 'a' �`r s r , -0„ SY' „_� 1 1 tar a l l a�w K fl ql / �r=rc LOT 30 ff. RROWHEIe,^. � 7 tar s _ •w KLOT ,. ti LOT 48 X11 1 i { LLYK LOT n/ i 11A44 U41 K t� f4i �a p� • ;N� �. \� dr ,ppj4 .c'� LOT a LOT 3y us K L♦ lar .D A ✓]f ♦,� LOT a 1Of M ow K am LOT 43 �.;� ► ,+ -___. L�� .% , � wN' R lap K ra ' '+ � � . .a ♦r " LOT n ` LOT W 4 ua. uw K . tar a 1 6774Lo K W7 K t . PROPOSED ADDITION(S) SHOWN IN BLUE ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF ARROWHEAD TRAIL INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SCONDARY SYSTEM RIGHT ROADWAY DESCRIPTION LENGTH OF WAY WIDTH SERVICES Miles Feet Feet Houses Arrowhead Trail from the intersection with Sundance Rd (VA SEC. Route # 1160) to the cul-de-sac. 0.25 50 28 21 ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF ARROWHEAD TRAIL INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SCONDARY SYSTEM (D- C.170-IMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 South Broad Street STEPHEN C. BRICH SALEM, VA 24153 COMMISSIONER January 16, 2019 Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Voice: Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax: Subject: Surety and Fees Needed for Street Additions in Belmont Section 1 County of Roanoke Attachment "A" Please be advised that the streets shown on the attached 'Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance are satisfactory and eligible to be accepted as part of the secondary system of state highways. After receiving your surety, applicable fees, and any outstanding items listed on the attached 'Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets,' we will notify the local authorities of those facts and confirm the agenda item for the acceptance of these streets by the governing body at their meeting, scheduled for February 26, 2019. Their resolution initiates the final steps required for VDOT to accept these streets and begin maintenance. Based on the date of the local governing body's meeting indicated above, the Department has determined a surety expiration date and the amounts required for surety, maintenance payment, and administrative cost recovery fee as shown at the top of the attached 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance.' If surety is required, your surety provider may, at their option, list these streets within the body of the document or incorporate the attached list of streets in their document by reference. For your convenience, pre -approved surety forms are attached. Please note that if all necessary documents and monies are not received by the end of business February 12, 2019, the necessary resolution by the governing body may be deferred, a new final inspection may be required, and the amount of the fees may be adjusted. We encourage you to avoid such delays and any potential increase in costs associated with the acceptance of these streets by delivering all outstanding items and fees to this office as soon as possible. 4 Zrian. Blevins, P.E. Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use Salem Residency Attachments Cc: Alex Chaney, E.I.T. Roanoke County Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets In order for VDOT to notify the County that the streets in the subject subdivision are ready to be accepted by the Department for maintenance, please be advised that the developer is responsible for providing the following documents, or assuring they have been provided, to VDOT before the date of the Board of Supervisors meeting. ❑ Bond, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement or Cash Bond as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance, provided to the residency office and NOT to Richmond. ❑ Maintenance Fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ Administrative Cost Recovery fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ An executed copy of any prescribed County -State Agreement for all County controlled grade separation structures (24 VAC 30-91-110.J) Crossings of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.1) PE certification regarding hydraulic design and construction of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.2) Stormwater management impoundments receiving run-off from a roadway (24 VAC 30-91-1101) Railroad crossings (24 VAC 30-91 -1 10.M.4.b) ❑ Permits for any non-compliant sidewalk, bicycle, and/or shared use path facility impacting the dedicated right- of-way (24 VAC 30-91-110.1.2) ❑ Quitclaims of all prior easements that conflict with the dedicated right-of-way. ❑ "Remain in Place" permits from all utility companies and for all facilities impacting dedicated rights-of-way. ❑ Two (2) normal size copies of the recorded subdivision plat for all sections. ❑ Two (2) copies of the recorded plat reduced to 11 inches X 17 inches. ❑ One (1) fully annotated and clearly readable sketch of the subdivision layout, providing a realistic representation of the street network, with north arrow, on paper not less than 8.5 inches by 11 inches and not greater than 11 inches by 17 inches. (See example provided) ❑ One (1) copy of the approved road plans and one copy of the road plans in electronic format (or 2 paper copies). ❑ One (1) set of detailed design and one (1) set of as -built plans for all bridges and culverts providing a contiguous opening of more than 36 square feet. Note: Some counties have adopted a county wide comprehensive storm water management agreement with VDOT that may relieve the requirement of providing such an agreement. Contact the residency's land development or permit section to determine if a such an agreement is required for your subdivision. 111612019 page 7 of 7 Mr. Developer: Typically, VDOT sees one of the four forms of Surety listed below. Enclosed you will find a partially completed Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement, and Performance Bond that your financial institution may find helpful. The terms of these documents have been reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General and approved for use as a guidance document. If none of these customary forms of surety covering new subdivision streets is acceptable to you, VDOT will consider your proposal of an alternative form of surety. Non-interest bearing cash bond paid to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation Letter of Credit (usually issued by a commercial lending institution) Escrow Agreement (Note: VDOT does not act as a "Trustee.") Performance Bond (usually issued by a commercial bonding or insurance company) SURETY ADDENDUM Instructions Page Provide this page, the Surety Addendum and Sample Surety Documents to Developer Printed by VDOT on: January 16, 2019 Mr. Developer - Provide this document along with the Surety Addendum and the sample surety documents provided by VDOT to the institution that you expect to issue your Surety. Please be advised that the Surety Addendum must be incorporated within the Surety by reference or otherwise the Surety must identify the County, the subdivision and list the streets covered within the Surety document. To be acceptable, the Surety must be capable of being drawn at a counter within the Commonwealth of Virginia or, if the streets covered are in a county contiguous with a boardering state, at a counter in either the Commonwealth of Virginia or the bordering state. Please note that you are responsible for paying by Cashier's Check the amounts indicated on the Surety Addendum as Maintenance Fee and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. These amounts may be combined in one check. Surety Issuer• The Surety Addendum may be incorporated by reference within the body of your Surety document by citing the name of the Subdivision, the name of the locality, and resolution date. Otherwise, in addition to that information, a listing of streets, termini and lengths must be Included within the body of your Surety document. Surety must be delivered to the following address: 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Certification of institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument Issued Name of Institution issuing surety AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date SURETY ADDENDUM Surety and Fees Data for the Street Inventory Listed Below Surety Expiration Amount of Surety Inspection Fee in Cost Recovery Fee 3/31/2020 $8,000.00 $600.00 $900.00 Total Lane Miles for Fees Q7 1110 mile Factor 4 The dollar amounts shown in the table titled "Fees and Surety for the Street Additions Listed Below" were calculated in accordance with §24 VAC 30-91-140 of VDOT's Subdivision Street Requirements (SSRs). The amounts are based on the following described inspection approach and the listed inventory of streets proposed for acceptance in the captioned subdivision. The fee amounts reported here govern over those in Appendix 1 of the Subdivision Street Requirements, which is illustrative and presumes standard VDOT inspection. The Surety Expiration dale, if shown, is (a) the earliest surety expiration date acceptable to VDOT, (b) based on the date of the Local Government's resolution requesting VDOT to accept the streets, and (c) may includes a processing period for VDOT's final acceptance. Surety and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee is based on the following: Standard VDOT inspection procedures were used. Costs associated with intermittent VDOT inspections are recovered under the standard fee structure for the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance Project or Subdivision: Belmont Subdivision Section One Locality and Anticipated County of Roanoke Resolution Date: February 26, 2019 Route Street Name Termini Description and Length Lanes: �Median Fee Lane Number Type: Lanes Miles 1405 Lawson Lane From: Intersection with Mountain View RoadfRoute 651 r 1 2 0.06 To: Intersection with future road/future Route 1406, Length (mi): 0.03 1405 Lawson Lane From: Intersection with future road/future Route 1406 1 To: End of Cul-de-sac on Lawson Lane, Length (mi): 0.13 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument , Issued Name of Institution issuing surety Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date AMD Rev. 12 01 2007 Irrevocable Letter of Credit For Subdivision Streets to be Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Beneficiary: Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: Please send this document to the VDOT Office located at: Maintenence Division Salem 1401 East Broad Street 714 S. Broad St. �I i Richmond, Virginia 23219 Salem, VA 24153 Developer: Fralin Companies 080 Belmont Subdivision Section One Address: PO Box 20886 Subdivision City, State, Zipcode Roanoke, VA 24018 County of Roanoke 212612019 Locality and Date to the Governing Body's Resolution Issuing Bank: Bank Number Address Letter of Credit No. City, State, Zipcode Issue Date Expiration Date Amount (US Dollars) W ................ •..... .................... Eight Thousand Dollars And No Cents 8000 We hereby open this letter of credit in the amount shown above for the above named Developer in favor of the Virginia Department of Transportation. These funds shall be available by your sight draft signed by the VDOT Residency Administrator or his representative stating that the draw is for the specific purpose of recovering all loss, cost, damage or expense incurred to correct faulty workmanship or materials associated with the construction of one or more streets and/or related drainage facilities listed on the attached VDOT document entitled "Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance" identified below for the Subdivision in the Locality named above. All sight drafts made pursuant to this instrument shall bear the clause "Drawn under (Institution's Name and Address) for Letter of Credit No. , Issued Expiring i in the amount of $ We hereby engage with you that drafts in compliance with these terms shall be duly honored. This letter of credit becomes operative and will expire at our counters on the dates first written above. Except as expressly stated herein, this credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, as amended), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) (Title) (Asset) SEAL Attachment: 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance,' dated: 1 16/2019 The Virginia Department of Transportation will accept this document duplicated on a financial institution's stationery or the institutions standard letter of credit format, provided all of the information and terms cited above are included. PERFORMANCE BOND A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: This document is to be provided to the Beneficiary's Ofli -e located at: Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Belmont Subdivision Section One Locality's Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 2J2612019 """".....""" Eight Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $$,000,00 3/31/2020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Banding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, that above named Principal, and the above named Bonding Company (hereinafter "Surety") are held and firmly bound unto the Commonwealth of Virginia in the full and just sum shown above as -Amount of S,irety," current money of the United States, to be paid upon demand to the said Commonwealth of Virginia, to which payment thereof we hereby bend ourselves, each of us, and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with our seals and dated this day of WHEREAS, the Principal has constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled "Surety Addendum", and the Commonwealth, acting through the Department of Transportation, anticipate accepting the inventory of streets shown thereon for maintenance as part of the VDOT maintained secondary system of state highways. NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such that the Principal shall, for a period not less than one year, following the date of the Locality's Resolution and ending on the date of expiration cited above, indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia from all loss, cost, damage, or expense incurred in the repair of said streets, including the drainage facilities pertaining to said streets, and to persons and property lawfully on such streets occasioned by defective materials and/or workmanship. This obligation shall remain in full force and effect through the expiration dale cited above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and Surety have caused these presents to be executed and their seals affixed the day and year first above written. Signature of Principal (Fralin Companies. Typed or Panted Name ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF Witness. to wit: I, , a notary public in the State and City/County aforesaid, do certify that (Name) , (Title) a duly authorized representative of the 'Principal (Developer)', appeared before me and acknowledged the foregoing instrument this day of NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Note: An original copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12/01/2007 A Surety tiPerformance Bond) for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Locality County of Roanoke Subdiv sion 080 Belmont Subdivision Section One Bonding Company. Signature of Attorney -in -Fact: Countersigned. Typed or Printed Name Resident Virginia Agent: AFFIDAVIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SURETY STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF aforesaid, do certify that (Name) to wit: a notary public in the State and City. County (Title) an Officer of the forenamed Surety, did appear before me and make oath that he is duly authorized to execute the foregoing bond by virtue of a certain power of attorney of said company, dated the day of , and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the in/as , that said power of attorney has not been revoked; that the said company has complied with all the requirements of law regulating the admission of such companies to transact business in the Commonwealth of Virginia; that the said company holds the certificate of the Commissioner of Insurance authorizing it to do business of the Commonwealth of Virginia; that it has a paid up cash capital of not less than $250,000; that the paid up capital, plus the surplus and undivided profits of said company, is $ ; that the penalty of the foregoing bond ;s not in excess of ten per centum of said sum; that the said company is not by said bond incurring in the aggregate, on behalf or on account to the principal named in said bond, a liability for an amount larger than one tenth of its paid up capital, plus its surplus and undivided profits; that the said company is solvent and fully able to meet promptly all its obligations, and the said Officer thereupon, in the name and on behalf of the said company, acknowledged the foregoing writing as its act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Page 2 of 2 Note: An orig nal copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation, AMD Rev. 12/01/2007 ESCROW AGREEMENT A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer, This document Is tL:. be provided to the Beneficiary's Office Imated at: Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 LocalityCounty of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Belmont Subdivision Section One Locality's Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 212611019 ***********f1,**R**k********►**** Sight Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $8,000.00 3/31/2020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24016 THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of and between the above named Developer, party of the first part, and" by hereinafter called "Trustee", party of the second part, and the Virginia Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "Commonwealth", party of the third part." U11[04*P WHEREAS, the plat for the above named Subdivision is recorded in the above named Locality of Virginia, within which Developer constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled 'Surety Addendum,' which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Developer is required to provide Surety against any defects in workmanship and/or materials used in the construction of the streets in the above subdivision and included on the 'Surety Addendum' for a period of one (1) year following the date of the Locality's Resolution date and expiring, as shown above; and WHEREAS, for the term of this Escrow Agreement, the Commonwealth has agreed that the Developer may deposit the above indicated Amount of Surety in escrow to cover costs incurred by the Virginia Department of Transportation to correct defects due to faults in workmanship or materials used in the construction of the streets described in the attached Surety Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the following terms and conditions the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 Developer has deposited with Trustee, and Trustee by the execution hereof acknowledges that he holds the above listed Amount of Surety under the terms of this agreement. 2 Trustee shall immediately place and maintain the above listed Amount of Surety with the Financial Institution named above in an interest bearing account conditioned to allow withdrawal of all or part of the funds by the Trustee at any time without penalty, until the expiration date cited above. 3 In the event the Commonwealth, in its sole discretion, deems it necessary to perform any work, including labor, use of equipment, or materials to correct defects in workmanship and/or materials used by the Developer in the construction of said streets during the period this Escrow Agreement is in force, either by its own forces or by contract, Trustee shall disburse to the Commonwealth within five (5) days of receipt of written demand such sum or sums for such work from the Amount of Surety stated above. 4 The Trustee shall pay any sum remaining in said account to the Developer not sooner than one (1) day after the Surety Expiration Date cited above, at which time this Escrow Agreement shall terminate. _ _ _ ..._ _ ... In the County of Roanoke _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - By resolution of the governing -body adopted February 26, 2019 ... -- --- - - - The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Oficial): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Type Change to the Secondary System of State -Highways; Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705 Lawson Lane, State Route Number 1405 Old Route Number 0 -------------------------------------------- • From Intersection with future road future Route 1406 To. End of Cul-de-sac on Lawson Lane, a distance of 0.13 miles. Recordation Reference instrument #201501599 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Nwmber Lawson Lane, State Route Number 1405 Old Route Number: 0 T — — — — — — — — — — — — — r • From: Intersection with Mountain View Road/Route 651 — _ To: Intersection with future road/future Route 1406, a distance of 0.03 miles Recordation Reference: Instrument #201501599 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VD41' Norm AM -4.3 (420-2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: February 26, 2019 Page 1 of l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LAWSON LANE OF BELMONT SECTION I INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of State highways, pursuant to §33.2-705 of the Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Resolution requesting acceptance of Leighburn Drive of Buckland South into the Virginia Department of Transportation System Tarek Moneir Acting Director of Development Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept Leighburn Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation System. BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke is requesting that the Board of supervisors approve a resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept, as described by the AM -4.3 (See Attachment "A"), 0.15 mile of Leighburn Drive from the intersection with Barrens Rd (VA SEC. Route # 797) to its cul-de-sac. This road is located within Buckland South subdivision in Hollins Magisterial District. See attached Exhibit "A" for exact location. DISCUSSION: The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The road has been deemed acceptable for inclusion in the VDOT system. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit «A» ::r ,r+"`'►.r,i 4 VICINITY MAP: ova PROPOSED ADDITION(S) SHOWN IN BLUE ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF LEIGHBURN DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SYSTEM RIGHT ROADWAY DESCRIPTION LENGTH OF WAY WIDTH SERVICES Miles Feet Feet Houses Leighbum Drive from the intersection with Barrens Rd (VA SEC. Route # 797) to the cul-de-sac. 0.15 40 30 8 ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF LEIGHBURN DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SYSTEM Attachment "A" C-PUMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 South Broad Street STEPHEN C. BRICH SALEM, VA 24153 COMMISSIONER January 16, 2019 Parsell & Zeigler Development Corp. 302 Second Street Voice: Roanoke, VA 24011 Fax: Subject: Surety and Fees Needed for Street Additions in Buckland South Subdivision County of Roanoke Please be advised that the streets shown on the attached 'Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance are satisfactory and eligible to be accepted as part of the secondary system of state highways. After receiving your surety, applicable fees, and any outstanding items listed on the attached 'Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets,' we will notify the local authorities of those facts and confirm the agenda item for the acceptance of these streets by the governing body at their meeting, scheduled for February 26, 2019. Their resolution initiates the final steps required for VDOT to accept these streets and begin maintenance. Based on the date of the local governing body's meeting indicated above, the Department has determined a surety expiration date and the amounts required for surety, maintenance payment, and administrative cost recovery fee as shown at the top of the attached 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance.' If surety is required, your surety provider may, at their option, list these streets within the body of the document or incorporate the attached list of streets in their document by reference. For your convenience, pre -approved surety forms are attached. Please note that if all necessary documents and monies are not received by the end of business February 12, 2019, the necessary resolution by the governing body may be deferred, a new final inspection may be required, and the amount of the fees may be adjusted. We encourage you to avoid such delays and any potential increase in costs associated with the acceptance of these streets by delivering all outstanding items and fees to this office as soon as possible. Brian K. Blevins, P.E. Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use Salem Residency Attachments Ce: Alex Chaney, E.I.T. R. Roanoke County Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets In order for VDOT to notify the County that the streets in the subject subdivision are ready to be accepted by the Department for maintenance, please be advised that the developer is responsible for providing the following documents, or assuring they have been provided, to VDOT before the date of the Board of Supervisors meeting, ❑ Bond, Irrevocable fetter of Credit, Escrow Agreement or Cash Bond as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance, provided to the residency office and NOT to Richmond. 0 Maintenance Fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance L3 Administrative Cost Recovery fee as indicated in the attached inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ An executed copy of any prescribed County -State Agreement for all County controlled grade separation structures (24 VAC 30-91-110..1) Crossings of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.1) PE certification regarding hydraulic design and construction of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.2) Stormwater management impoundments receiving run-off from a roadway (24 VAC 30-91-1101) Railroad crossings (24 VAC 30-91-110.M.4.15) ❑ Permits for any non-compliant sidewalk, bicycle, and/or shared use path facility impacting the dedicated right- of-way (24 VAC 30-91-110.1.2) ® Quitclaims of all prior easements that conflict with the dedicated right-of-way, ❑ "Remain in Place" permits from all utility companies and for all facilities impacting dedicated rights-of-way, 0 Two (2) normal size copies of the recorded subdivision plat for all sections. 0 Two (2) copies of the recorded plat reduced to 11 inches X 17 inches. © One (1) fully annotated and clearly readable sketch of the subdivision layout, providing a realistic representation of the street network, with north arrow, on paper not less than 8.5 inches by 11 inches and not greater than 11 inches by 17 inches. (See example provided) U One (1) copy of the approved road plans and one copy of the road plans in electronic format (or 2 paper copies). Q One (1) set of detailed design and one (1) set of as -built plans for all bridges and culverts providing a contiguous opening of more than 36 square feet. Note: Some counties have adopted a county wide comprehensive storm water management agreement with VDOT that may relieve the requirement of providing such an agreement. Contact the residency's land development or permit section to determine if a such an agreement is required for your subdivision. 1116/2019 page r of t Mr. Developer: Typically, VDOT sees one of the four forms of Surety listed below. Enclosed you will find a partially completed Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement, and Performance Bond that your financial institution may find helpful. The terms of these documents have been reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General and approved for use as a guidance document, If none of these customary forms of surety covering new subdivision streets is acceptable to you, VDOT will consider your proposal of an alternative form of surety. Non-interest bearing cash bond paid to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation Letter of Credit (usually issued by a commercial lending institution) Escrow Agreement (Note; VDOT does not act as a "Trustee.") Performance Bond (usually issued by a commercial bonding or insurance company) SURETY ADDENDUM Instructions Page Provide this page, the Surety Addendum and Sample Surety Documents to Developer Printed by VDOT on; January 16, 2018 Mr. Developer: Provide this document along with the Surety Addendum and the sample surety documents provided by VD©T to the institution that you expect to issue your Surety. Please be advised that the Surety Addendum must be incorporated within the Surety by reference or otherwise the Surety must identify the County, the subdivision and list the streets covered within the Surety document. To be acceptable, the Surety must be capable of being drawn at a counter within the Commonwealth of Virginia or, if the streets covered are in a county contiguous with a boardering state, at a counter in either the Commonwealth of Virginia or the bordering state. Please note that you are responsible for paying by Cashier's Check the amounts indicated on the Surety Addendum as Maintenance Fee and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. These amounts may be combined in one check. Surety Issuer - The Surety Addendum may be incorporated by reference within the body of your Surety document by citing the name of the Subdivision, the name of the locality, and resolution date. Otherwise, in addition to that information, a listing of streets, termini and lengths must be Included within the body of your Surety document. Surety must be delivered to the following address: 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Certification of Institution issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' Is hiereby Incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument , Issued Name of Institution Issuing surety Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and pate AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 SURETY ADDENDUM Surety and Fees Data for the Street Inventory Listed Below Surety Expiration Amount of Surety Inspection Fie Admin Cost Recovery Fee 3/31/2020 $9,000.00 $438,00 $1375.00 Total Lane Miles for Fees 1110 mile Factor The dollar amounts shown in the table titled "Fees and Surety for the Street Additions Listed Below" were calculated in accordance with §24 VAC 30-91.140 of VDOT's Subdivision Street Requirements (SSRs). The amounts are based on the following described inspection approach and the listed inventory of streets proposed for acceptance In the captioned subdivision. The fee amounts reported here govern over those in Appendix 1 of the Subdivision Street Requirements, which Is Illustrative and presumes standard VDOT inspection. The Surety Expiration date, if shown, is (a) the earliest surety expiration date acceptable to VDOT, (b) based on the date of the Locat Government's resolution requesting VDOT to accept the streets, and (c) may Includes a processing period for VDOT's final acceptance. Surety and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee Is based on the following: Standard VDOT inspection procedures were used. Costs associated with Intermittent VDOT Inspections are recovered under the standard fee structure for the Administrative Cast Recovery Fee. Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance Project orSubdivision BUokland South Subdivision Locality and Anticipatetl County of RoanokeTT�T Resolution Rate: February 26, 2019 Route Street Name i"arminl Description and Length Lanes: Median Fee Lane Number Type: Lanes Miles 2027 Lefghburn Drive From: Intersection with Barrens Road/Route 797 To: 2 t 2 41,30 End of Cul-de-sac on Leighbum Crlve, Length (rW): 0.15 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby Incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument , Issued Narne of Institution Issuing surety Signature of Authorized institution Officer and Bate AMD Rev. 12-01.2007 Irrevocable Fetter of Credit For Subdivision Streets to be Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Beneficiary: Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: Please send this document to the VOOT Office located at: Maintenence Division Salem 1401 East Broad Street 714 S. Broad St. Richmond, Virginia 23219 Salem, VA 24183 Developer: Parsell & Zeigler Development Corp. 480 Buckland South Subdivision Address: 302 Seoond Street Subdivision City, State, Zipcods Roanoke, VA 240110000 County of Roanoke 2/26/2019 ,y,. ._.....� ._� Locality and Date to..:,:.w. the Governing Body's Resolution Issuing Bank: Bank Number Address Letter of Credit No...,�.=n,��4......._ � Clty, State, Zipcode Issue Date Expiration Date Amount (US Dollars) "`""""""" °""' ` " Nlne Thousand Dollars And No Cents 9000 We hereby open this letter of credit In the amount shown above for the above named Developer in favor of the Virginia Department of Transportation. These funds shall be available by your sight draft signed by the MOT Residency Administrator or his representative stating that the draw is for the specific purpose of recovering all loss, cost, damage or expense Incurred to correct faulty workmanshlp or materials associated with the construction of one or more streets and/or related drainage facilities listed on the attached VDOT document entitled "Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance" identified below for the Subdivision in the locality named above.- All bove. All sight drafts made pursuant to this Instrument shall bear the clause "Drawn under (Institution's Name and Address) for letter of Credit No. Issued , Expiring , in the amount of $ " We hereby engage with you that drafts In compliance with these terms shall be duly honored. This letter of credit becomes operative and will expire at our counters on the dates first written above. Except as expressly stated herein, this credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, as amended), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No, 800. (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) (Title) (Asset) SEAL Attachment: 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance,' dated: 111612019 The Virginia Department of Transportation will accept this document duplicated on a financial Institutions stationery or the Institution's standard letter of credit format, provided all of the Information and terms cited above are included. PERFORMANCE BOND A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: This document is to be provided to the Beneficiary's Office located at: Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24163 Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Buckland South Subdivision Locality's Resolution Dale Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 2/20/2019 *k**kkkkkk* Nine Thousand Dollars And No Gents Surety Expiration Date $9,440,01} 3/3112020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Parselt & Zeigler Development Corp. 342 Second Stroot Roanoke, VA 240110000 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, that above named Principal, and the above named Bonding Company (hereinafter "Surety") are hold and firmly bound unto the Commonwealth of Virginia In the ful(and just sum shown above as "Amount of Surely; current money of the United States, to be paid upon demand to the said Commonwealth of Virginia, to which payment thereof we hereby bind ourselves, each at us, and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with our seals and dated this day of _ I --- WHEREAS, the Principal has constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled "Surety Addendum", and the Commonwealth, aeon through the Department of Transportation, anticipate accepting the inventory of streets shown thereon for maintenance as part of the VDOT maintained secondary system of state highways. NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such that the Principal shall, for a period not less than one year, following the dale of the Locality's Resolution and ending on the date of expiration cited above, Indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia from all loss, cast, damage, or expense incurred In the repair of said streets, Including the drainage facilities pertaining to said streets, and to persons and properly lawfully on such streets occasioned by defective materials and/or workmanship. This obligation shall remain in full force and effect through the expiration date cited above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and Surety have caused these presents to be executed and their seals affixed the day and year first above written. Signature of Principal (Parsell & Zeigler Development Corp.) WFtness: Typed or Printed Name ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF.� CITYICOUNTY OF _ to I, a notary public in the State and City/County aforesaid, do certify that (Name) , (Title) , a duly authorized representative of the'Principal (Developer)', appeared before me and acknowledged the foregoing Instrument this day of NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Note; An original copy of all pages is 10 he filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12101/2007 A Surely (Performance Bond) for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Locality County of Roanoke Subdivislon 080 Buckland South Subdivision Bonding Company: Signature of Attorney -in- Fact: Countersigned: Typed or Printed Name Resident Virginia Agent: AFFIDAVIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SURETY STATE (COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF _ ®, to wit: I, , a notary public in the State and City/County aforesaid, do certify that (Blame) , (Title) an Officer of the forenamed Surety, did appear before me and make oath that he Is duly authorized to execute the foregoing bond by virtue of a certain power of attorney of said company, dated the day of , and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the .............. Was , that said power of attorney has not been revoked; that the said company has compiled with all the requirements of law regulating the admisslon of such companies to transact business In the Commonwealth of Virginia; that the said company holds the certificate of the Commissioner of Insurance authorizing it to do business of the Commonwealth of Virginia; that It has a paid up cash capita# of not less than $250,000; that the paid up capital, plus the surplus and undivided profits of said company, is $ that the penalty of the foregoing bond Is not In excess of ten per centum of said sum; that the said company is not by said bond Incurring In the aggregate, on behalf or on account to the principal named in said bond, a liability for an amount larger than one tenth of its paid up capital, plus Its surplus and undivided profits; that the said company is solvent and tufty able to most promptly all its obligations, and the said Officer thereupon, in the name and on behalf of the said company, acknowledged the foregoing writing as its act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC 11) Number My commission expires: Page 2 of 2 Note: An original copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12101/2007 ESCROW AGREEMENT A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer., This document is to be provided to the Beneficiary's MOO located at; Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24188 Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Buckland South Subdivision Locaity'a Resolution Date Amount at Surety, alpha and numerically. 8/2E12019 aeaa•......a..►♦+aaa.aataa�raaaaa Nine Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $9,000.00 3131/2020 Name and Address of Pfinc€pal (a,k,a, Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State o1 Incorporation Parsell & Zeigler Development Corp. 302 Second Street Roanoke, VA 244110004 THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , by and between the above named developer, party of the first part, and" 'hereinafter called "Trustee", party of the second part, and the Virginia Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "Commonwealth", party of the third part.,' WITNESS: WHEREAS, the plat for the above named Subdivision is recorded in the above named Locality of Virginia, within which Developer constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled'Surety Addendum,' which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Developer Is required to provide Surety against any defects in workmanship and/or materials used in the construction of the streets in the above subdivision and included on the'Surety Addendum' for a period of one (1) year following the date of the Locality's Resolution date and expiring, as shown above; and WHEREAS, for the term of this Escrow Agreement, the Commonwealth has agreed that the Developer may deposit the above indicated Amount of Surety in escrow to cover costs incurred by the Virginia Department of Transportation to correct defects due to faults in workmanship or materials used In the construction of the streets described in the attached Surety Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the following terms and conditions, the parties hereto agree as follows: I Developer has deposited with Trustee, and Trustee by the execution hereof acknowledges that he holds the above listed Amount of Surety under the terms of this agreement. 2 Trustee shall immediately place and maintain the above listed Amount of Surety with the Financial institution named above In an interest bearing account conditioned to allow withdrawal of all or pert of the funds by the Trustee at any time without penalty, until the expiration date cited above. 3 In the event the Commonwealth, In its sole discretion, deems It necessary to perform any work, including labor, use of equipment, or materials to correct defects in workmanship and/or materials used by the Developer In the construction of said streets during the period this Escrow Agreement is in force, either by Its own forces or by contract, Trustee shall disburse to the Commonwealth within five (5) days of receipt of written demand such sum or sums for such work from the Amount of Surety stated above. 4 The Trustee shall pay any sum remaining In said account to the Developer not sooner than one (1) day after the Surety Expiration Date cited above, at which time this Escrow Agreement shalt terminate. A Surety (Escrow Agreement) for 1he Addition of Streets to the Secondary System of Slate Highways. Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Buckland South Subdivision Witness the following signatures and seals: Principal (Parsell & Zeigler Development Corp.) Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITYICOUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) -.. --- , a duly authorized representative of [Developer), party of the first part, acknowledged the foregoing Instrument before me this clay of , NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: ID Number Trustee Dale COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) ,_„ , 'Trustee", party of the second part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of , NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires:, Commonwealth Transportation commissioner or Authorized Representative Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF __, to wit: (Name) "Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner or authorized representative", party of the third part, acknowledged the foregoing Instrument before me this day of _ , NOTARY PUBLIC My commission explres: Page 2 of 2 ID Number In the County of Roanoke ............................................................................,..................----......... By resolution of the governing body adopted February 26, 2019 The following Y.DOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testae Signed (County Oficial): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginla Statute: §3&2.705 Street Name artdlor Rsuts Number 4 Lelghburn Drive, Stats Route Number 2027 Old Route Mumbor; 0 • From: Inkersociion with f�rren:e RsadiRoute 79i -------------------------- a- To: End of Cul-de-sac on Leighburn DHve, a distance of, 0,16 miles. Recordation Reference: Instrument #201411876 Right of Way vvidth (feet) : 0 VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4/20/2007) Winlcnanae Division Date of Resolution: February 26, 2019 Page I of I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LEIGHBURN DRIVE OF BUCKLAND SOUTH INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of State highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Resolution requesting Matthew Drive, Adam Transportation System. BACKGROUND: February 26, 2019 Resolution requesting acceptance of Matthew Drive, Adam Drive and Spring Grove Drive of Edgefield Subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Tarek Moneir Acting Director of Development Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept Drive, and Spring Grove Drive into the Virginia Department of The County of Roanoke is requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept, as described by the AM -4.3, (See Attachment "A") 0.11 mile of Matthew Drive from the intersection of Adam Drive to the intersection of Spring Grove Drive; 0.23 mile of Adam Drive from the intersection at the 2800 block of Matthew Drive to the intersection of Spring Grove Drive; 0.16 mile of Spring Grove Drive from the intersection with Matthew Drive to its cul-de-sac. These roads are located within Edgefield subdivision in the Vinton Magisterial District. See attached Exhibit "A" for exact locations. DISCUSSION: The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation. These roads have been deemed acceptable for inclusion in the VDOT system. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit "A" �reK F A%x H VICINITYMAF 4 a� ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF MATTHEW DRIVE, ADAM DRIVE, AND DEPARTMENT OF SPRING GROVE DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY SYSTEM 11 STEPHEN C. BRICH COMMISSIONER January 16, 2019 Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 COl'V MONWEALT'H of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 South Broad Street SALEM, VA 24153 Subject: Surety and Fees Needed for Street Additions in Edgefield Section 3 County of Roanoke Attachment "A" Voice: Fax: Please be advised that the streets shown on the attached 'Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance are satisfactory and eligible to be accepted as part of the secondary system of state highways. After receiving your surety, applicable fees, and any outstanding items listed on the attached 'Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets,' we will notify the local authorities of those facts and confirm the agenda item for the acceptance of these streets by the governing body at their meeting, scheduled for February 26, 2019. Their resolution initiates the final steps required for VDOT to accept these streets and begin maintenance. Based on the date of the local governing body's meeting indicated above, the Department has determined a surety expiration date and the amounts required for surety, maintenance payment, and administrative cost recovery fee as shown at the top of the attached 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance.' If surety is required, your surety provider may, at their option, list these streets within the body of the document or incorporate the attached list of streets in their document by reference. For your convenience, pre -approved surety forms are attached. Please note that if all necessary documents and monies are not received by the end of business February 12, 2019, the necessary resolution by the governing body may be deferred, a new final inspection may be required, and the amount of the fees may be adjusted. We encourage you to avoid such delays and any potential increase in costs associated with the acceptance of these streets by delivering all outstanding items and fees to this office as soon as possible. rian K. Blevins, P.E. Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use Salem Residency Attachments Cc: Alex Chaney, E.I.T. Roanoke County Check List of Items Required to Complete VDOT Acceptance of Streets In order for VDOT to notify the County that the streets in the subject subdivision are ready to be accepted by the Department for maintenance, please be advised that the developer is responsible for providing the following documents, or assuring they have been provided, to VDOT before the date of the Board of Supervisors meeting. ❑ Bond, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement or Cash Bond as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance, provided to the residency office and NOT to Richmond. ❑ Maintenance Fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ Administrative Cost Recovery fee as indicated in the attached Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance ❑ An executed copy of any prescribed County -State Agreement for all County controlled grade separation structures (24 VAC 30-91-110.J) Crossings of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.1) PE certification regarding hydraulic design and construction of dams (24 VAC 30-91-110.K.2) Stormwater management impoundments receiving run-off from a roadway (24 VAC 30-91-1101) Railroad crossings (24 VAC 30-91-110.M.4.b) ❑ Permits for any non-compliant sidewalk, bicycle, and/or shared use path facility impacting the dedicated right- of-way (24 VAC 30-91-110.1.2) ❑ Quitclaims of all prior easements that conflict with the dedicated right-of-way. ❑ "Remain in Place" permits from all utility companies and for all facilities impacting dedicated rights-of-way. ❑ Two (2) normal size copies of the recorded subdivision plat for all sections. ❑ Two (2) copies of the recorded plat reduced to 11 inches X 17 inches. ❑ One (1) fully annotated and clearly readable sketch of the subdivision layout, providing a realistic representation of the street network, with north arrow, on paper not less than 8.5 inches by 11 inches and not greater than 11 inches by 17 inches. (See example provided) ❑ One (1) copy of the approved road plans and one copy of the road plans in electronic format (or 2 paper copies). ❑ One (1) set of detailed design and one (1) set of as -built plans for all bridges and culverts providing a contiguous opening of more than 36 square feet. Note: Some counties have adopted a county wide comprehensive storm water management agreement with VDOT that may relieve the requirement of providing such an agreement. Contact the residency's land development or permit section to determine if a such an agreement is required for your subdivision. 111612019 Page 1 of 1 Mr. Developer: Typically, VDOT sees one of the four forms of Surety listed below. Enclosed you will find a partially completed Letter of Credit, Escrow Agreement, and Performance Bond that your financial institution may find helpful. The terms of these documents have been reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General and approved for use as a guidance document. If none of these customary forms of surety covering new subdivision streets is acceptable to you, VDOT will consider your proposal of an alternative form of surety. Non-interest bearing cash bond paid to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation Letter of Credit (usually issued by a commercial lending institution) Escrow Agreement (Note: VDOT does not act as a "Trustee.") Performance Bond (usually issued by a commercial bonding or insurance company) SURETY ADDENDUM Instructions Page Provide this page, the Surety Addendum and Sample Surety Documents to Developer Printed by VDOT on: January 16, 2019 Mr. Developer• Provide this document along with the Surety Addendum and the sample surety documents provided by VDOT to the institution that you expect to issue your Surety. Please be advised that the Surety Addendum must be incorporated within the Surety by reference or otherwise the Surety must identify the County, the subdivision and list the streets covered within the Surety document. To be acceptable, the Surety must be capable of being drawn at a counter within the Commonwealth of Virginia or, if the streets covered are in a county contiguous with a boardering state, at a counter in either the Commonwealth of Virginia or the bordering state. Please note that you are responsible for paying by Cashier's Check the amounts indicated on the Surety Addendum as Maintenance Fee and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. These amounts may be combined in one check. Surety Issuer• The Surety Addendum may be Incorporated by reference within the body of your Surety document by citing the name of the Subdivision, the name of the locality, and resolution date. Otherwise, in addition to that information, a listing of streets, termini and lengths must be Included within the body of your Surety document. Surety must be delivered to the following address: 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 AMD Ftev. 12-01-2007 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument Issued Name of Institution issuing surety Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 SURETY ADDENDUM Surety and Fees Data for the Street Inventory Listed Below Surety Expiration Amount of Surety Inspection Fee Admin Cost Recovery Fee 3/31/2020 $20,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Total Lane Miles for Fees U9 1/10 mile Factor 10 The dollar amounts shown in the table tilled "Fees and Surety for the Street Additions Listed Below" were calculated in accordance with §24 VAC 30-91-140 of VDOT's Subdivision Street Requirements (SSRs). The amounts are based on the following described inspection approach and the listed inventory of streets proposed for acceptance in the captioned subdivision. The fee amounts reported here govern over those in Appendix 1 of the Subdivision Street Requirements, which is illustrative and presumes standard VDOT inspection. The Surety Expiration date, if shown, is (a) the earliest surety expiration date acceptable to VDOT, (b) based on the date of the Local Government's resolution requesting VDOT to accept the streets, and (c) may includes a processing period for VDOT's final acceptance. Surety and the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee is based on the following: Standard VDOT inspection procedures were used. Costs associated with intermittent VDOT inspections are recovered under the standard fee structure for the Administrative Cost Recovery Fee. Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance Project or Subdivision: Edgefield Section Three Locality and Anticipated County of Roanoke Resolution Date: February 26, 2019 Route Street Name -ermin Description and Length Lanes: Median Fee Lane Number Type: Lanes Miles 1312 Matthew Drive From: End State Maintenance on Matthew DriverRoute 2 1 2 0.22 1312 To: Intersection with Spring Grove Drive, Length (Wl: 0.11 1403 Adam Drive From: Intersectior w th Matthew Drive?Route 1312 To: 2 1 2 0.4iS Intersection with Spr ng Grove Drive, Length (mi): 0.23 0673 Spring Grove Drive From: Intersection with Matthew Drive To: Intersection ? 1 2 0.14 wth Adam Drive, Length (m ): 0.07 0673 Spring Grove Drive From: Intersection with Adam Drive To: End of Cul-de- 2 0.16 sac on Spring Grove Dr,ve, Length (mi): 0.08 Certification of Institution Issuing Surety This 'Surety Addendum' is hereby incorporated as part of our Surety Instrument , Issued Name of Institution issuing surety AMD Rev. 12-01-2007 Signature of Authorized Institution Officer and Date Irrevocable Letter of Credit For Subdivision Streets to be Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Beneficiary: Virginia Department of Transportation Issuer: Please send this document to the VDOT Office located at: Maintenence Division Salem 1401 East Broad Street 714 S. Broad St. Richmond, Virginia 23219 Salem, VA 24153 Developer: Address: City, State, Zipcode Issuing Sank: Address City, State, Zipcode Fralin Companies PO Box 20686 Roanoke, VA 24018 080 Edgefield Section Three Subdivision County of Roanoke 2/26/2019 Locality and Date to the Governing Body's Resolution Bank Number Letter of Credit No. Issue Date Expiration Date Amount (US Dollars) .............. ...............tf Twenty Thousand Dollars And No Cents 20000 We hereby open this letter of credit in the amount shown above for the above named Developer in favor of the Virginia Department of Transportation. These funds shall be available by your sight draft signed by the VDOT Residency Administrator or his representative stating that the draw is for the specific purpose of recovering all loss, cost, damage or expense incurred to correct faulty workmanship or materials associated with the construction of one or more streets and/or related drainage facilities listed on the attached VDOT document entitled "Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance" identified below for the Subdivision in the Locality named above. All sight drafts made pursuant to this instrument shall bear the clause "Drawn under (Institution's Name and Address) for Letter of Credit No. Issued , Expiring . in the amount of $ We hereby engage with you that drafts in compliance with these terms shall be duly honored. This letter of credit becomes operative and will expire at our counters on the dates first written above. Except as expressly stated herein, this credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, as amended), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) (Title) (Asset) SEAL Attachment: 'Surety Addendum - Inventory of Streets Proposed for VDOT Acceptance,' dated:1 16/2019 The Virginia Department of Transportation will accept this document duplicated on a financial institution's stationery or the institution's standard letter of credit format, provided all of the information and terms cited above are included. PERFORMANCE BOND A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation issuer: Th -s document is to be provided to the Beneficiarys Off cc- located at. Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Edgefield Section Three Locality s Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically. 2/26,2019 "`*'**'*"*"'"''"""'"""*"**** Twenty Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $20,000.00 121?2020 Name and Address of Prncipal Wk.a. Deveroper) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, that above named Principal, and the above named Bonding Company (hereinafter "Surety") are held and firmly bound unto the Commonwealth of Virginia in the full and fust sum shown above as "Amount of Surety,' current money of the Un led States, to be paid upon demand to the said Commonwealth of Virginia, to which payment thereof we hereby bind ourselves, each of us, and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with our seals and dated this day of WHEREAS, the Principal has constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled "Surety Addendum", and the Commonwealth, acting through the Department of Transportation, anticipate accepting the inventory of streets shown thereon for maintenance as part of the VDOT maintained secondary system of state highways. NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this obligation is such that the Principal shall, for a period not less than one year, following the date of the Locality's Resolution and ending on the date of expiration cited above, indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia from all loss, cost, damage, or expense incurred in the repair of said streets, including the drainage facilities pertaining to said streets, and to persons and property lawfully on such streets occasioned by defective materials and/or workmanship. This obligation shall remain in full force and effect through the expiration dale cited above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and Surety have caused these presents to be executed and their seals affixed the day and year first above writter. S gnature of Prircipal (Fralin Companies) Witness: Typed or Printed Name ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF to a notary public in the State and City/County aforesaid, do certify that (Name) (Title) , a duly authorized representative of the 'Principal (Developer)', appeared before me and acknowledged the foregoing instrument this day of NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Note: An original copy of all pages is to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12/01/2007 A Surety iPerformance Bond) for Subd vision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation Local ly County of Roanoke Subdiv:sion 080 Edgefield Section Three Bond ng Company: Signature of Attorney -in -Fact: Countersigned: Typed or Printed Name Resident Virginia Agent: AFFIDAVIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SURETY STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF aforesaid, do certify that (Name) to wit: _, a notary public in the State and City. -County (Title) , an Officer of the forenamed Surety, did appear before me and make oath that he is duly authorized to execute the foregoing bond by virtue of a certain power of attorney of said company, dated the day of , and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the in/as , that said power of attorney has not been revoked; that the said company has complied with all the requirements of law regulating the admission of such companies to transact business in the Commonwealth of Virginia; that the said company holds the certificate of the Commissioner of Insurance authorizing it to do business of the Commonwealth of Virginia; that it has a paid up cash capital of not less than $250,000; that the paid up capital, plus the surplus and undivided profits of said company, is $ ; that the penalty of the foregoing bond is not in excess of ten per centum of said sum; that the said company is not by said bond incurring in the aggregate, on behalf or on account to the principal named in said bond, a liability for an amount larger than one tenth of its paid up capital, plus its surplus and undivided profits; that the said company is solvent and fully able to meet promptly all its obligations. and the said Officer thereupon, in the name and on behalf of the said company, acknowledged the foregoing writing as its act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires: Page 2 of 2 Note: An original copy of all pages -s to be filed with the Department of Transportation. AMD Rev. 12/01/2007 ESCROW AGREEMENT A Surety for Subdivision Street Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation issuer: Trois d.cument � io be provAied to the Beneficiaryrs Office located at: Salem, 714 S. Broad St., Salem, VA 24153 Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 1080 Edgefield Section Three Locality's Resolution Date Amount of Surety, alpha and numerically, 2/26/2019 ******R*****i***itiiifi*******i* Twenty Thousand Dollars And No Cents Surety Expiration Date $20,000.00 3/31/2020 Name and Address of Principal (a.k.a. Developer) Name and Address of Bonding Company and State of Incorporation Fralin Companies PO Box 20886 Roanoke, VA 24018 THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of and between the above named Developer, party of the first part, and" by , hereinafter called "Trustee", party of the second part, and the Virginia Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "Commonwealth", party of the third part." WITNESS: WHEREAS, the plat for the above named Subdivision is recorded in the above named Locality of Virginia, within which Developer constructed the streets listed on the attached report titled 'Surety Addendum,' which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Developer is required to provide Surety against any defects in workmanship and/or materials used in the construction of the streets in the above subdivision and included on the 'Surety Addendum' for a period of one (1) year following the date of the Locality's Resolution date and expiring, as shown above; and WHEREAS, for the term of this Escrow Agreement, the Commonwealth has agreed that the Developer may deposit the above indicated Amount of Surety in escrow to cover costs incurred by the Virginia Department of Transportation to correct defects due to faults in workmanship or materials used in the construction of the streets described in the attached Surety Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the following terms and conditions, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 Developer has deposited with Trustee, and Trustee by the execution hereof acknowledges that he holds the above listed Amount of Surety under the terms of this agreement. 2 Trustee shall immediately place and maintain the above listed Amount of Surety with the Financial Institution named above in an interest bearing account conditioned to allow withdrawal of all or part of the funds by the Trustee at any time without penalty, until the expiration date cited above. 3 In the event the Commonwealth, in its sole discretion, deems it necessary to perform any work, including labor, use of equipment, or materials to correct defects in workmanship and/or materials used by the Developer in the construction of said streets during the period this Escrow Agreement is in force, either by its own forces or by contract, Trustee shall disburse to the Commonwealth within five (5) days of receipt of written demand such sum or sums for such work from the Amount of Surety stated above. 4 The Trustee shall pay any sum remaining in said account to the Developer not sooner than one (1) day after the Surety Expiration Date cited above, at which time this Escrow Agreement shall terminate. A Surety (Escrow Agreement) for the Addition of Streets to the Secondary System of State Highways. Locality County of Roanoke Subdivision 080 Edgefield Section Three Witness the following signatures and seals: Principal (Fralin Companies) Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) , a duly authorized representative of [Developer], party of the first part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires Trustee COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF (Name) part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of ID Number Date to wit: "Trustee", party of the second NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission expires - Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner or Authorized Representative Date COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF , to wit: (Name) , "Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner or authorized representative", party of the third part, acknowledged the foregoing instrument before me this day of , NOTARY PUBLIC ID Number My commission exp res Page 2of2 In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing body adopted February 26, 2019 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system ofstate highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Official): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705 Street Name and/or Route Number Matthew Drive, State Route Number 1312 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: End Stale Maintenance on Matthew Drive/Route 1312 To: Intersection with Spring Grove Drive, a distance of. 0.11 miles. Recordation Reference. Instrument #201808010, 201700591, 201805859 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Spring Grove Drive, State Route Number 673 Old Route Number: 0 • From: Intersection with Adam Drive r — — — — r — — — — — To: End of Cul-de-sac on Spring Grove Drive, a distance of: 0.08 miles. Recordation Reference: Instrument #201808010, 201700591, 201805859 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route NuMber Spring Grove Drive, State Route Number 673 Old Route Number: 0 • From: Intersection with Matthew Drive To: Intersection with Adam Drive, a distance of. 0.07 miles. Recordation Reference: Instrument #201808010, 201700591, 201805859 Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDQ1 ]-orm AM 4 3 A-711 7ra[,71 Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: February 26, 2019 Page i of 2 Adam Drive, State Route Number 1403 Old Route Number: 0 --------------------------------------------- • From: Intersection with Matthew Drive/Route 1312 To: intersection with Spring Grove Drive, a distance of: 0.23 miles. Recordation Reference: Instrument #201808010, 201700591, 201805859 Right of Way width (feel) = 0 VD01 l -mm AM 4.3 (4,20.'2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MATTHEW DRIVE, ADAM DRIVE AND SPRING GROVE DRIVE OF EDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of State highways, pursuant to §33.2-705 of the Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Edwin R. "Randy" Leach, Commonwealth's Attorney, upon his retirement after more than thirty-three (33) years of service Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Recognition of the retirement of Edwin R. "Randy" Leach BACKGROUND: Edwin R. "Randy" Leach, Commonwealth's Attorney, retired on February 1, 2019, after thirty-three (33) years and ten (10) months of service with Roanoke County. DISCUSSION: Mr. Leach is unable to attend today's meeting and his quilt and resolution will be mailed to his home. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO EDWIN R. "RANDY" LEACH, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN THIRTY-THREE (33) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Mr. Leach was employed by Roanoke County on April 15, 1985; and WHEREAS, Mr. Leach retired on February 1, 2019, after thirty-three (33) years and ten (10) months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Leach's tenure he has served as Chief Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, Senior Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney and Commonwealth's Attorney has served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Leach through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life and providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, throughout Mr. Leach's tenure with Roanoke County, his enthusiasm, dedication, and professionalism to his work, has earned the admiration and respect of his colleagues throughout the Commonwealth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to EDWIN R. LEACH for more than thirty-three (33)years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 1 of 1 H O i H O 0: fC .Q m V m i O dA a a O V i m O 00 v _m m (1 }i m L - CL O / //L 1 /1 m a ri N �t al 00 M l0 01 00 iq 00 �t N O M W N O > LncI lO l0 c -I l0 00 y N ci r -I v ' O O O O tka f6r O rZ 00 c O V -tn -tn OJ O O • O C o > N OJ O O C11 Ln a ri ri C y V C C M Ln l0 00 00 i M N CL m N N Q m C 00 � O N � c I 0�0 00 c -I N O N N O0 I N Z� 00 N Ln O N LnO — N u O C D U C L O ) 0 00 LL 0 N 0A N +�+ N j �� O_ 'a M N U � s O rn O C 00Q -i 'O 00r N O N Lu O L 0 tO N E U W m Li O s } L .0- E E Li N O Q y ti (6 Q L OJ v u u v0 Q V ++ Q O O Q a f0 a a a s Q Q m COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Audited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2018 Additions Deletions February 26, 2019 General Obligation Bonds $ 2,765,175 $ - $ VPSA School Bonds 72,194,043 27,875,000 8,121,855 Lease Revenue Bonds 77,970,000 2,935,000 Premiums 9,929,441 _ $ 162,858,659 $ 27,875,000 $ 11,056,855 - $ Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Acting Director of Finance Approved By Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator 2,765,175 91,947,188 75,035,000 9,929,441 179,676,804 N e c TC > a C r C t0 Q ts W ! Y � Z o i Q D U it .a F LL ® LL ! rao N L Z C CD (� + ® E ! U CD c ! 1 C > c � 1 L � t0 , 1 L U I K' V e m m 0 \ \ \ o \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 A N N M I� r 00 O O M O r W N co r,M O M O r, O O co Lf') I- O N i0 CL 49 7 e �9 at ix M m M OM r M N M M O o0 O r M O ItT ItT N O Itil O Lf) Lf) r- Lf) Lf) O M O NM co Lf) r- CO 00 Co I-� N o6 O M M M ; O CU r M zT O O O O 00 O O O O M O O O Lf) O O O O LL N o00 W N M M t4y M o o (14 O 00 Cl) O O co Lf) N r Itil O d Lfi \ \ 0 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ \ 0 0 U')N Lf) O 00 O O M O r W N co r,M O M O r, O O co Lf') I- O N Lf') ItT O r I, ? O r N O r, O N CU O r r-� O N N N O O Lf) r 00 r LO CO O M ' r ' M I- O ' M r V V co N 00 N 1:T N U) V M O) O CO O N d' 00 N ® CO r, d' r Co co N V Lf) O CO O O co O co 00 (N r- '31 Lf) V n N (D co U') CO Lf ) U') co Co O ItT T 00 N O co co 06 M Lf) 00 O O O O Co Lf) M N N M r CO r N r I, (N n O 00 r 00 n O ® O r o0 r N .... Lf.) O r- O co ... O O O O N Lf) O M Lf) O N ® O o 0 o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 N� O O V co O m O r 00 N M 00 Lf) Co a0 (D C O Lf') O Lf') co O O m M r O O r r O 00 O O 00 a0 r I� N � Lf) O O O N Lf ) o0 Co O Co 00 6 M O O C') -ItLf) O V= O I- r Lf) Lf) Lf) ItT M M V r- Co ItT m d' 0) zT r M N O Lf) r O O M V O r O � O V r, ® N M O L f ) o) � � Lf) r- Co I� O O O r- Lf) O ® O O O Lf ) I, CO r- O Lf') M C") V O Lf) O r- �_ O_ d' N Co N O Lf) Lf) Lf ) d' co ® O 00 � � � Co N 00 O I- O n O Lf) V V co N T � N O I� Lf) r� O ItT r- N r- (N LO 00 = co 00 r Lf) r� Lf) O I- n zT ItT N Lf) r 00 Lf) r N CO ® 00 O C\F Cl) T d' n r O N U) O Lf) O O O I, O O (N r O O U') U') O O O O d' O O O 00 O O Lf) O ® O (N Co O O ® O O O r- O co Lf') O O O O 10 Lf) O M Lf) O N N O V O N O N O O O V ® V r-� N O O 00 O 00 Lf) I, Lf ) = O = Co O co 00 r O) Lf ) 00 O Lf ) r- Cl) Co M Lf ) Lf') -It CO O Cl O 1:11 m O O O Co M O O Lf ) � Lf ) O O 00 O O Lf ) M O M O I- N r O r -Izi M M O O 10 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N_ Co I:T O) 00 O 00 00 00 O (N O) !S) Lf) O O CO r Co ItT N r- O O r- O r Lf) r V f9 Co O 1:T N r I, W 6 r --z r-� N O 6 N Lf ) Co 00 M ® 4 Lf ) O .4 I-� .4 ('') V 1:T V N r- r Lf ) Cl) 1:1, 1:T -'T Co LO r Co N V V Mr- r O -'TW O CO O O r, N Lf ) N I, N O L f ) o) � O r- 'T O 00 Lf ) I- N (D r O Lf ) I, 00 co = N N N O M O M O o0 O N CO N O (N r (N d' V U') 00 !f) Cl) CO Co M 1:31 I- N O r, O P, M MrM Lf ) O) O) O O 'i N I-� M Lf I- 00 = 00 00 N Lf) r� Lf) O I- n zT ItT N Lf) r 00 r N CO ® 00 O 00 Cl) d' n r O N Cl N r T Lfi Mr d' r r (VLO E9 00 = O N O Lf ) Lf ) O O O Cl) O O N O O�_ O Lf ) m O O O Co M O O Lf ) � Lf ) O O 00 O O Lf ) N O O I- CO O O O M O O O 10 N O V O O W m O O O O n Lf) CO O O CO N O M O O d' r- O Iti O O O O O O 7 O -Iz N q7 I-� O U5 7 ItT N Lf) N I- 00 00 00 N O 00 O = (D Lf) O 0) r N Lf) 00 O r- O O r W O 1:T r- N O N Lf ) Lf ) Itil Co N r O N Cl) M rM O M Co N r r -Izi M 69 U) N x f0 H T) 07 = p Lo tx0 a) Vj 0- N ~ L x L 025 U) 0 � U) � O x N x m p x N U) 00 H H Cl w C x Lx cc � .� E L� H a) LL N r O N T a) V O m o -o U X U N d C x J O � N LL N _ .- U � p M f1 N O - x N N J O2 C 025 C e U In J I U � O N m O > N 0 4) N O U x O a U f1 In cn m e 0 E fo E W W N O m O U s= o W �zs ~ ~ � 0- m 0- 0 U J U m LL H D z H O Q J LL U 0- 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 o 0 o 0 � 0 o 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 o 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ItTd' W r- r- O n O CO � ® O Lf) r- CO N O O c ® co Ci CO N rl� O O U') r- = (14 N r, O r- = O O O .r_80 LO N N r N O O T 00 M N r O 4 O O N N 'o ' co T r O > � yry 4Y es i0 T 00 00Lf') r, W M 00 o) I- O N w CO m r, r, O O W N N CO Lf) ® CO N ® N ItT 00 co N n V M N O ® 00 00 I, 00 fA 00 O 00 n Co r r fA Lf) Lf) O O 00 Lf) 00 N N N -Iz 1� O cr� = O N Cl) o7 O CO 00 O V r Lf) U) co N C N (N 00 M M M CO T Y9 a 0 0 o 0 �_ 0 o 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 o 0 � 0 � 0 o 0 � 0 �_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ®y LO N CO 0) r O U') v v N co CO IZ3, 00 O O N N 00 co r M r O r N CO r r- Lf) (14 I- O O O m o0 U') I, Lf) O ^ Lf) O I� ® -4 o0 Lf) N Lf) O O 7 CO d' I- co -It n N 00 CO Lf) d' V LO CO m N N r- ItT O CO O f9 N 07 U') Lf) co co O) 00 O O 00 00 00 r- N ® O Lf) LO O O N M = Lf) CO O (14 O N ? Lf) U) (N Lf) 00 O O ® o) 00 O Cl O 07 r O r Lf) 7 r n r- N V O O n O -q W (\ N M d' -q V ++ _ IZ3,CO r r- M ® � � Lf) Co I- O C ®y N N r 07 C T N Cl) r, O O r o) r N r N N r N at ix V ® O ® O O ® Lf) O O LS') IZ3, CO Lf) US) O zT N M '31 O O ® O ® O O ® O O O = Cl) Cl) 00 O Co Lf) I- 0') O N Lf') Lf') O N N I, O O n Lf) O O r O r- V = N O ar 49 -Iz Lf) O O O 00Lf) CO M LO M M O N N Lf) W O ® N n r- � M U') (14 O = = r, 00 Co M r, d. N N O M 07 O Lf) r IZ3, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lf) US) Cl) 00 CO N n N � O ® Lf ) w V � Co O O N 04 r O O Lf) 00 V ® Lf) (14 r Ci r r Co O 1:T O O 00 00 O Lf) U') (D7 r--� r-4� ® 07 M co Lf) O N N N O O 1 ' I� N -Ito) Lf) LO N r- Cl) M � Lf) Lf) Lf) Co �7 � N 4 I® N N Cl) r- ® M V co Lf') Lf') Cl) M r- 0') 00 O O 00 Lf ) �% -ItCO N N LO I- Lf ) � I, 00 N I- O ` I� n O CO I® a0 r OO n N CO � C') Lf') Lf') M M 7 Cl) d' Lf) C6 CO o) P O Cfl N U') N co O Lf ) r- 00 0') O) O ®r M N ^ M N O co CO a0 Qy N O ® N CO O Lf') O O I- N N r N N r N ® O ® O O ® 00 O O 00 (D Lf) LS) O Lf ) Lf ) Co IZ3, O O LO O ® O O ® 0') O O W 00 M M U) O CO CO (14 O) O Lf ) U') O N N I, O O N = O CO 00 O V 00 I- N O ar 49 7 Lf) O O 00 W M O M N M o) 00 00 N Lf) 0) N O ® � n r- d' M r M 00 M O CO O Co M r, T 04 O O N 07 IZ3, O 00 O 'ZI, r Lf) M N 7 U O E e ® N co a) U v C:o ° a 0 U ( a w N U U _ O O N C U " a U °) U N U ° o y U U U O O (n fn '06 Q ® a LL p 0 w 4) r (0 m (D cc (n U (0 LL U — 4)LL Q aQ U) U) Q U N a. aeU c ii m m U U = O U U) m w � pm 0 Q)C N N N f0 -a N U) N U 0 0 N (D a) a) U 0 E 0 0 U N U O U N o o o U U o N N H C: H > fll > N fp fp 'a H U U N H O� N �_ fll U -a LZ 0� 0� _r_ 0 _r_ 0 w 0� ZU) O w 0 e a $ a 2 a a C) c Cl \ \ / 7 ■ a a 0 a 0 a 2 � o o J § e $ R $ 2 r LO® = U) \ % $ \ < a $ a $ a a © Q ® § y \ $ 7 § 2 / 2 k ( % r, o 0 e r r, 0 \ 2 $ e f ƒ § a e / Cl) co co c \ k� - - \ƒkk / m \ \ U \ .0 2 3 r g � Q a $ a $ a a CD ® © 7 y \ 5 \ m ) 2 k ( % co 0 0 0 0 � \ Cl) § ■ / a \ CL ix CD 0 2 2 E < Cl) = m LO Ld k k .0 CD 0 3 g a § k } k ( 0 § / 2 / ) $ ) R § E E \ J 7 2 / \ / \ 3 F- e U c l0 7 O L_ O) W O O N } C l0 C pp co 2 N 7 (c0 O � U r_ c c as LlJ CL Y O w o Q io U O L C F LL LL O1 O c >- 10 (O -c d c Fz r_ W n o O O m g O c > C > N N E U N U) o d LL C. U O O A E 7 O) O .O C W m c w Q O W � C sO+ W CE Q U W W oa O w m � U � C j (0 CE Q U W W oa a o a a a - a o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a a o o a a V 00 V V 00 P LO N P N P LO O O O Cp O 00 N O V O LO N (P O) r O P r O N W P (0) r (P W Il� O O P W O Ln O O to O LLQ � Ln (y O V r O LLQ m (D P Ln V O (D O m O I O m N M N Cl) W LO W O O O O N O O N N O O O O m N O M O O O NV O) P O V (D m 00 lt9 OO O Ln LO N N V P P co O) O Ln M M O N O O O Ln O) (DD W LL) � OO 00 OO N M ® W r Ln N O r^OM Q N m V P (r O N N r M M L O M N O V LO m (D ® V P M(D N N N (D N 00 M P O T O N V 00 LL .... 0 0 0 o o o o a o 0 0 o a o o o o a o 0 0 N r V P W V to O r V LO 00 O (o V P O) O 00 O V V O LO O P r (0) (D O W ® N W V O ® Ln r P P P O O O r V O M O U) 00 ^ 00 r O m W O N O W LO O O 00 O M V O N O LO V to U) fD Ln LO LO LO Ln Lf) fp fD Ln U) I- LO LO P M W P O LO W N V V Ia P O W � O Ln P P OO P N N M m O O m N Lij O O CD V O) P O V O OO P 00 N O 00 P O) M N (y O) (D P P O (y M co a7 O m P N co M P r M ® M ® Ln V Cl) N O W cr O O _ O) W O OO 00 OO LO CD M m W O N V P V Ln LO O Cl) Q W m V M M M N N r M P L O M N O N O V LO m O ® V P O) O N O) (D N P P O T O 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P W 0) M r LO O) W N O O V O O P O O 7 O) O V O U) Ln O) N M O) O M W V N Vn (® r In r P W O ® O 7 c0 O M O N M r ^ 00 O) LO �j P O) O) P 00 00 co O (D O) O co O V CO O (D O 00 U)9 V LO ll9 LO LO LO V U) LO LO (D V L!) h LO U) N Ln V ® W O)P N a1 P Ln � C14 Ln V N N P O O O W P O O O Lo N M ( N O) V M Ln ® O M V LO O P M L O M O M W N In M N P OO Lf) O P P P Ln ® O Cl) ® O W N M P M Ln (D O) M O L O Cl) N (8 N O V LO m O ® V P O) O g0 O) (D N P P O T O M V 00 LO Cl) P N P Cl) O 0) Ln W W W N M Ln In V P Cl) 00 N 00 r r N T T W r 00 Cl) V V r r � V co r Vcli (D V Q r W V M N N r N P N Q M N O 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P W 0) M r LO O) W N O O V O O P O O 7 O) O V O U) Ln O) N M O) O M W V N Vn (® r In r P W O ® O 7 c0 O M O N M r ^ 00 O) LO �j P O) O) P 00 00 co O (D O) O co O V CO O (D O 00 U)9 V LO ll9 LO LO LO V U) LO LO (D V L!) h LO U) N Ln V ® W O)P N a1 P Ln Ln P W Ln V M to O O O W O O N O O) m N O N N O M O_ (D V O) N_ M W V N V O) @) (® P In M V Cl) W W V O Cl) N In P O P V N P M V Ln 00 r Q L V M O O V P O) N 00 V Ln P U) OO N Ln N O) N Ln Cl) W O) (D M (D Cl) ® OO Ln (D M M V LO W Lo P Ln P V P r M N 00 P O I� W Cr) r r N Cl) Ln P O O M V co P Ln co (D V Q r W V N N r N P N Q M N O F O E N c U C to M LO ® W 00 N a1 P W LUR O O N co O O OO O W O O O O O P O) P V M 00 (D V V N In M W Lfi V V 00 O O O O P V (® In M O (D O Ln 00 P O Cl) O O P P LO N (D M C O U) r- W L O W Lo 00 M M 00 V M P P P O O P P O 00 Lf N Ln (D V Cr) O) (D ® Ln P Ln r O Ln Ln r N I� 00 r r N T T P O ' P M @ V V N r (D V r C 0 c O - (0 (0 en C O C O c to c .£ NE U N "O Q O ' @ Q C C 00 Mn N N Q U _ F O E c U C Q C7 E cc m O a) QE CL xs C � "O E U) N 7 N U (O N N N U N C (O > (0 £ N OL O Q L L .N N aS Q E U U > ca m 0 'O CO W (n 0 rn CO o O N N "� = N L N N C W @ m (O W C -_ :%) @ m N N 2 (n N LO_ Q U U) N L U W m N @ U N N C N @ O ..� U m U @ .�. L la �_ E. N N N 4)O 7 @ O C 7 N N @ CL N (0 7 N O O O J O w 0 05 -"j J 11 U Q d OT w S o a. 2 m w U d cn i o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o a o a o 0 0 0 0 D) V Q7 O O N ® O W V P L1') O O O lry O N O W O r 00 CD 0 0 O O 0 O O N P M O O •� LO N O P O N O CD N O M O O O 00 O r V r N U O N O O W O O M O O A M O N O V V M M O O O P LO O Cl) N 00 P N M O ® V M N a7 M P N P O P LO co N CO v 06 V v oo V W v r r r LOD LOO M C6 06 N m O O 9 7 V r Q a o o o o a o 0 0 o a o o a o a CD P P O O LO V N 00 O N N O O 00 O 200 r W In O O O O O O P_ V O M V fD r UO r, M 04 O O M 04 o LO V V 00 O V LO O O LO O (y iV (D (D 00 P P fb e0 LO W m � w CL o W p0 M LO O m C)N 00 m LO W O CD O 00 O 00 CD 00 CD V O O O O O O a) V) M 0) M O r O Q V Cl) LO N O P -I P qo O MN O LO O M Nr 00 N Bj M a N O MO M LO (y O V 00 O) r M LO t�1 C C r N M O P O M N Q = C r 7 U W W Ob V NT W m O Ly 00 O P P O N O O LOM P O O O O) O O O O O O O O 00 V LO Q7 M ® V O N P W O V O O O LO 00 O r 00 N 00 Cl) 0 O O ® Cl) OM M w V N O O O M N V) r0 00 LO O P 70 N V <D r Q N m 04 N LO V O O m N 0 o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o a o a a o 0 0 0 0 P O O a) CD 00 N P M N N O O LO C9 00 m LO P O r O O O O O O O O r O O LO 1p P It ® N 7 -� O LO P LO 47 P LO LO LO O V LO LO V m O LO P co T P fD V LO O O LO O ® N V m 00 P try LO LO W M m oa w CL O W N 00 NN N O O ® ® W P O O O O O O M Cl) 00 LO O N CD O O O O LOO V N fcb O LO W N O LO P O N N O M LO O LO 0 M r 00 Ly 00 N Nr P N N 00 co 00 O V r CD V LO 0) Q O O CD co LO j ` m Cl) Cl) LOO 0) } C .8 E r N M O P m M N O O r d W W oa P N V O LO O ® M CD P O V P O LO N N O O a1 O O O O c3> O O N CD M c N O CD N W M P O M V CD O O M O O O O) N V N O 't _ LO C> CO N O (D' P O P O (y N 00 P O 00 LO O O O ® LO co T P O ® co O O 04 P M LOO_ W r LM[)_ LO W r ® Cl) N V LD r Q N 00 N O Cl 'IT O ( m N N c O .6 N cc W 21 O O_ Q Q- W @ 0) p U 7 0) U c c @ V U c ai N c a) E m CL '� c W oc a) >> O O c O 0) c O � c c n� O 2 O > Z 0) T >, C C m m rn 0) rn 0) N 9 '� a m E m m N 0) c U a) > U O '— � C m 0) N N c W a) C O Q m F F ® is N W L @ �` O 'C m O 9 > >. V n3 .� U N U "O OL CL 8 7 7 N to c C O O C E _O ci N X N U to a' x N 7 " N C, n3 Pin N (O D_ 9 J 7 U m d _@ 0_ O U U W O U O U W 0 2 0) F O T 10 c DC O E F C:3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: February 26, 2019 Accounts Paid -January 2019 Laurie L. Gearheart Acting Director of Finance Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 01/11/19 Payroll 01/25/19 Manual Checks Grand Total Direct Deposit 1,443,635.47 1,458,406.33 Checks Total $ - $ 10,636,716.34 19,902.26 1,463,537.73 24,855.94 1,483,262.27 12,179.42 12,179.42 $ 13,595,695.76 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: February 26, 2019 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 31 -Jan -19 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASHINVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 3,646,182.14 3,646,182.14 CrZOPA=1N �il�►�� SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA (113,450.00) SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 48,004,140.96 WELLS FARGO 7,000,000.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA (50,690.00) 54,840,000.96 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: 7,632,473.38 GENERAL OPERATION 15,211,107.45 15,211,107.45 MONEY MARKET: AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 2,044,625.65 BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 96,295.46 HOMETRUST BANK 11,547.36 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW - JAIL 1,136,742.42 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 7,632,473.38 WELLS FARGO 5,137,551.02 BANK OF THE JAMES 505,218.74 16,564,454.03 TOTAL 90,261,744.58 2/26/19 A1"14t"1tn2-.1L DECLARING MARCH AS MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS EDUCATION AND AWARENESS MONTH IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, often disabling disease of the central nervous system that affects approximately 400,000 people in the United States; and WHEREAS, it typically strikes young adults in the prime of life — in their 20's to 40's. Women are more likely to have Multiple Sclerosis by about 3:1. Symptoms can begin as simply as tingling and progress to near paralysis; and WHEREAS, March of 2019 is Multiple Sclerosis Education and Awareness Month. It is important for better education and awareness of Multiple Sclerosis so that it's victims can lead more productive and satisfying lives — to benefit themselves, their caregivers and families and the overall community; and WHEREAS, Multiple Sclerosis is a disease that not only affects the person with the condition, but also greatly impacts family, friends and the community; and WHEREAS, the exact cause of Multiple Sclerosis is still unknown, and there is no known cure; and WHEREAS, the symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis may be mild such as numbness in the limbs, or severe, such as paralysis or loss of vision; and WHEREAS, every hour of every day, someone is newly diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis; and WHEREAS, the Multiple Sclerosis Alliance Of Virginia (MSAV) provides programs and services for anyone in Virginia whose life has been affected by MS. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Phil C. North, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby recognize the month of March 2019, as Multiple Sclerosis Education and Awareness Month in the County of Roanoke and call this observance to the attention of all our citizens. Presented this 9th day of March 2019 J ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the County Administrator's Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Christopher R. Bever Director of Management and Budget Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Review of the proposed fiscal year 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget development process, County staff conducts a series of work sessions with the Board of Supervisors after the County Administrator proposes the capital and operating budgets. This work session will provide information on the proposed fiscal year 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) initially presented to the Board of Supervisors on January 22, 2019. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to adopt the CIP on May 28, 2019. DISCUSSION: This work session will provide information to the Board of Supervisors regarding the proposed fiscal year 2020 - 2029 CIP. The work session will also provide details on potential changes to the County Administrator's Proposed CIP. The attached Power Point presentation will be shown. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of the attached presentation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors receive information regarding the fiscal year 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Page 2 of 2 L.L L.L c O O 0 0 co r-I 0 N LL I W Ln O Q O L- CL CL N LnL- 0 O ca Q O U O N t�A U ca bn LL c O co E O 4- v r) n, U V.! N O O N .,er 13 I W Ln O Q O L- CL CL N LnL- 0 O ca Q O U O N t�A U ca bn LL c O co E O 4- r) 0) N O N L N Q O N O +, N X L z IL I N 00 O r- Lli O ze I-- OUl l0 if/ ifs N l0 00 O -cn- -u)- qcn- qcn- tn- M 40. 00000�� N 06 O� r<, �� O� O O N �oLn t4 cl- � -',4 -L4 O M� O Ln 0- 4-j a--+ c Qu N O L 0- E E N i C6 J C6 N Ln Q c Qu Qu O L 0- E E a--+ Ln N N a a--+ N N L a--+ Ln c Ln � Q cu cu > CU O N Q E i� c cu C6 N Cbn N N 0_ N U O CU f6 N J E Ln m Ili L 3 E L kn co O c� L Q N L 0 C3 G G1 i 3 LL LL y r� IL i O O r- N ze N C6 N L N 00 l0 O m w Il�- r -I un r -I N Ln r -I O O Ln r -I N O Ln M -U? i/? (:l 00 in- (`n (`n N N 01 i/)- i/)- i/? i/)- IA- i/? N 40. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O 0 -V/ r -I N M O rl i/)N N N � i/)- i/)- i/. O O O O O O O i i rrq O O l0 r -I O O O I� Lnw(DtLnoo 00 N i/? M Ln N N ID N -U? i/)- 1 i/? i/)- i/) - WE 00 l0 _Q N N N O L Q E N bn C6 ca O DC ca N Q O U L O U C6 a_ a--+ c N N bn ca c ca 2 Ln N m L 3 E L kn co r_ O CL i H c� �C G 3 G1 O Q O a N O CO 0) � O N O N O� �� g chi Nq c1 Nq L6 Q1 N M Lo � M N Lo 0000 t4 Lr� WE 00 l0 _Q N N N O L Q E N bn C6 ca O DC ca N Q O U L O U C6 a_ a--+ c N N bn ca c ca 2 Ln N m L 3 E L kn co r_ O CL i H c� �C G 3 G1 O Q O a O w w J i co � J ro ro ro ° LL o, 0 LU w c O 0- Ln fa 0 E E U .C: Q0 ori o, U t�A 0 a U 0 0 N U- •t Q) Q) • N N O w w J i co � J ro ro ro ° LL o, 0 LU w c O 0- Ln fa 0 E E U .C: Q0 ori o, U t�A 0 a U 0 0 N U- bD N0 E C45 Ln 0- CN4 7C) O O � N O � c:U CD N Q U I -a -M I0 %6 10 O ui o0 O � 0 0 LL N O O O = U I0 %6 10 O ui o0 O cr m N N O O O rn cn m O w m (0O M rri M m l0 -U? N M N M 40.i/)- � -U? i/)- r -I :1: C) M C) 0 I ^ N O O O O � w M M O O O O m O M O O � M O ui ui O m O M N M lzt l0 I� i/? N � i/? i/? 00 ih ih 40. 0 0 0 m M - O O O r -I ui ui N M i/? N N ui O i/)- -U? i/)- rq i/� C) M C) 0 I ^ N a E v N o o Q E o f6 O OO O M M O `i o c� O U N N � L cu � U C6 O UCO cu � O O � M O 0 N a E v N o o Q E o f6 O Q O j U N .° G1 •� a 4-j O L L `i o c� O U N N � L cu � U C6 O UCO cu a--+ u LN Ncu O O � a U \ Ln U E O w O CL O a C)**** C)NU N 70 O � C14 0 O Q N 0 IL U 0 N 0 N L.L a� 0 Q- 0 L. MW4 U O c 0 U w L tn U. U n IL A U G1 .0 a a, CL 0 a, 0 i 0 U W N 3 LL 3 LL 14 N � N � LL LL 4 lAw cr U-� LA Ol l0 w 00 Ln 4* Owl N O N 0) m cn � l0 O Il.% LL N m LA 4/)- 4/)- 40. O N 00 O 00 -0 N N I.A 00 ID It* m r -i Ln 4j)- 4j)- 40. X CN Ln ko E >- cl= Imo• c N Q � M H N U '> L N N N _ 0 l0 � Q N U •� � Q 0 > C o cr U_ Q Q •E ca >� 0 .� f6 -a 4-+ m Q U O o LV U U o 0 .N U > CL O ca 0 IL U 0 N O N L.L O L LA O N N l0 r -I Il.% -U? i/)- i/. 00 � m N Q Q N bn N ca i bn i CL N LL U f6 G1 N •0 E a m U O +� G1 m Oc� N U c U CU � i d m O EU O + i a.., LLL O 4-j 3 0 M LL a� c � � N LL U O L LA O N N l0 r -I Il.% -U? i/)- i/. 00 � m N Q Q N bn N ca i bn i CL N LL U f6 G1 N •0 E a m U O +� G1 m Oc� N U c U CU � i d m O EU O + i a.., LLL O 4-j 3 0 M LL IL U r� L.L C6 O r- r -I Ln m It* w r -I :* r -I 0 -cn- -cn- -cn- qn- -k • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I� O O rq N Ln m -cn- cn cn •v�• 0 i i O O O O O N l0 01 m in- M in- •VN• O O H H 00 N Q N N U C6 Q N iC bn c E N m 0 U 2 f6 N m N co bn 0- D D E N N O a U c N PZ TI ca W 3 O U O `~ O N W E 0 O U U N Q a -J aJ O U N f6 }' > ca -0 •U � OO o� O N N N U- m O N +-j > -0 M N O E N O W � •cn r -I � N W O :3 N 0 U W�J � •cy, O N m E�� U L � 1 N C)**** U �v o70 � o � } CN 0 C) Q � 0 �� o IL U 0 N O N LL D C6 L6 00 I- Ol W r -I r -I M -U? i/)- i/. IL U o� d' N 0 OO N O 0 O N O o� O O Lr� Lr�000 H U 0\ 0\ N 'i Ln ���o� 0-1-- r'4 C)� n 4j)- l i .ze m O ze O m (5, Ln O Ln lzt M un O N O N M Ln qzt l0 N I- O un un w r -I r -I Ol U') M 1H i/? r -I W in- in- in 40. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r -I I� Ln O O O N W r -I Ln N r- m Ul Ul m ri n �o cri r -I n n V). 1H M in- -kn d' OO O O O O O O O O Lr� Lr�000 C\ M\ 0\ 0\ M\ ���o� r'4 M 4j)- 4j)-o� Lr) N '14 M� cq L6 M� r -I E C2A u U bn O a U 4 N U NN in- m >�+ O N i 4 d' i 000 Q) ui o o m C\ M\ 0\ 0\ M\ E r'4 M Lr) N '14 M� cq L6 M� Ln E C2A u U bn O a U 4 N U NN r -I m >�+ O N i 4 oo _� a--' O a) i= N wUu U •W% O L- d w +� •U 000 m E r'4 cu j a--+ Q E b"n Ln E C2A u U bn O a U 4 N U NN r -I m >�+ O N i 4 oo _� a--' O a) i= N wUu U •W% O L- d w +� •U Q U U o 0 Q U cn CU NG.. U O +� U N _�, � � +, U}, i U >, E E O U O Q iO �N ca J m QJ O N CC nx m +�+ O V Q 0 IL U r� 0 N 0 N LL a� 0 Q - n rI O n , O �✓ O o M, O Q0 H •1W U .i Ln _N LL i U N O +j N O aA O U O N cr C6 Q O a - • • ^ O i Q 0 Q N .cr U ca U .N U C6 a-0 0 U i ate-+ N U i N N 0 O O O 0 in N O LL O O O -Ln N U U U � N � U i ni •1W U .i Ln _N LL i U N O +j N O aA O U O N cr C6 Q O a - • • ^ O i Q 0 Q N .cr U ca U .N U C6 a-0 0 U i ate-+ N U i N N 0 O O O 0 in N O LL O O O -Ln IL U r� L.L D /1 v .--. O d- m o 0 O 0 0 Ul �0) o Ul 0 0) 1^ 0 1^ qv .--. O d- O 0 O 0 0 Ul �0) o Ul 0 0) U Q ate--+ �O 1^ 0 1^ qv ^ �. d- �0) 0) U Q ate--+ �O 1^ 0 1^ qv ^ U Q ate--+ �O V u o a✓ N U O f6 N Q Q 4-j �.j 0 N a� O Ln r° " NCU ci N O _ N i p U U N ( V i LL — N O (n w � N N _N O o QN O LU QO n O i=U > w V V O O U O 0 01N LA 0: N • O cc �o M O U v N 0 c� 4 o U 0 o� o� o .. o � - o ,� N O � � O O N 0 LL 0 = > LL o 0 0 ori 0 0) > >; �/ E 'v O t1A U� 0 m Os'70 i o o o o ° o i N m � Q NO � > a) 0 N cr by CN O Op _ >- O cu U- � m _ c N N ._ E N Ln 0u NL oE� o -0 o �0-0o Ln tj 4-J • Ol ate-+ U fa V) v •� N •� O cin ;::: -D lV 0 >4, LL O O o� u con o, o N 0 O C- U I � O D IL lV 0 >4, LL O Q� n � � v 00 Q� n � hs f 0 000 � ami ami m � m � O Q � Q0 m w w O r -I N N O N Q0 r -I N O Ln Nm O O m Oi m Ln Q0 O ri w qj)- N r -I V)- V)- r -I r -I O O O O N N 0 0 0 o � � o m cin N O � O O N rq 00 Ln N rq X ^ N rA N Q N fV � N � 0 D N N a N >- Li- N >- c0 4 4 _ LL cu E Ev _ w E w w ca — ca C: N t�: N = v1 ca M D U CC N Q 0 a i O O O N LL fa C U U-] G LO lf'] x CC VI CO co ° Ia" :E O � N LL V1 CLQo �E c N LL • � v cu N � o� So- � 4 � P-4 v `n CIO Ul �g cu ,�_q,� © N CO g 2- O cn U u Ln U O � 00 N � U. O -0 >-a. Ln0 E aE N Q 0 a i O O O N LL fa C U U-] G LO lf'] x CC VI CO co ° Ia" :E O � N LL V1 CLQo �E c N LL • � v cu N � o� So- � 4 � P-4 v `n CIO Ul �g cu ,�_q,� © N CO g 2- O cn U u � N � M w ^ — C N o O p `E N O — Q N LL a o CO aLA M o N M 'E O Co co tlLn O a N LL o q�j N o E 7. CIO w V N ei` IR �co kl m am LL O TT1 N O � N _N O p N O v N � U ULL N • 1 N � 0 O L.L a LL cn I � U W O 4� N •�^ 0 O O •— ® N ® CL 0 L 3 `L 1 L p NO —0% ' No O cA v � O N �_ AV W .O L n a � N � M w ^ — C N o O p `E N O — Q N LL a o CO aLA M o N M 'E O Co co tlLn O a N LL o q�j N o 7. CIO w V N ei` IR �co kl o CO o o n U � � t1] L.L I � � �O O � N Ln Q0 N O m �o cr o 00 O o 0 th th th .� th N Lm Q00 N O m l00 ' O O CL 0 O � th th O c6 LL VU � .N O +' E }J (1) Z3 N -0 O CY) L 0 O N f6 00 N � f6 U Ol -0 01 >_ L r -I r -I \4-j I � r m O N00 m r- Ln O 00 cr o cr O o 0 Zt Lm Q00 N O m l00 O CL th th th th f6 U c6 LL VU � .N N u — U Q1 Q 0 OL L O CL Q � O f6 U c6 LL VU m U +' E }J (1) Z3 N -0 L 0 O N f6 N � f6 U O -0 LL >_ L _0Q) \4-j LL (n N N C: .4-j V' V O O O N (n > O U -04te- _ O O m L cn L E + >` V Q)L C Ln,z N DC 41 -0 O a--' Q) > vi — -IZ C: U v -C 41 ' C: LL a--' _0 Q) cn Q L M Z3 � Z3 Q) (� L) CL \ _0 0 O }+ Z3 N O 4-j N N v LL� 4-j Q) > U N V uL o L (n - 'U 0 p p L 41 O O >. La--+ cn N 41 N O C: 4-J C: , L 4- N -0 � 4 -JI C: i 41 V 41 O O M C: C: Z3 N N L O f6 U H 5 f6 U u Lu L C7 O U O m O U f6 v U oC > CL taA N 41 m U cn c6 L Q O U +J O U U - 41 > cn N v .L) v v v U > � L 0 N _�e4-O O U Ln N N N ,v v 0 0 0 m r -i 0 n 0 I- N O O I- O 01 I- t71 I- 00 00 O O 0 0 G� Lr� r- & 00 O m � 0 U ONi n 00 000 O 0 14 O r- r -i r- O 00 0 tn• m r -i l0 O �.n• cn• cn• cn• C � Qo rn Ln N t71 u N — a U Q � � 0 OL 0 m r -i 0 n 0 00 O 00 r -i O O w Q0 N N O Zt O Ln Lr� 00 O M 0 U ONi n 00 000 O 0 O O r- r -i r- O 00 m tn• m r -i l0 Ln �.n• cn• cn• cn• cn• � u — a U Q � � 0 OL N + L O Z3 aCL - Q � O f6 U c6 LL VU m U Lj E }J Q Z3 -0 N L 0 O N t6 N � t6 U O LL >_ L _0Q) \ LL 4-j (n N N i_ :Lj ,N VI V O O O N O U _ O O 41 � `- E 4-jm V Q L C: N,z DC Q -0 Q a--' Q > — -IZ t= U >, v -C Q ' C: LL a--' _0 Q cn Q L M Z3 � Z3 Q (� Z3 U Q Q O U +-+ L L-) CL \ _0 0 O 4-J N O 4-j N N v LLC: 4-j Q > Uo N V uL L (n U Q v Q p p Q •s -0 L Q O O >. La--+ N I Q N Q C: 4-J , L C: 4- N 4-J -0 C: i Q V Q cn cn O N O t'6 C: C: Z3 N N to L O t6 U H 5 t6 u U w L O C7 U O O m U t6 Q U oC > Q taA N Q m >` U >` cn U L LL � N O U � O U - >- > cin v U > o+LJ O U O O ( U \ N N H N v aj 0 0 IL U N O N L.L 0 N 0 N LL N 0 m a� 0 Q - n O Rt O �l� O O� O O O O O O 00 000 O O O Lr) LL LL O O� r -I 4j,)- M �D ko V)- t)- IV I, t)- IV I, LJ L ca a� 0- X LU M 04 O M lD m O O O O N N N N LL LL LL LL N N N N N N N •- . 4- O 0 i :3ci U aJ w ca a) 4- > E �w Oro .0 > 00O U 2 a) LU m � E bA >m N Ln 00 000 N N N 000 N N N U- U- U - Ln 0 m :R �U m LL CL .N L E V Q m S H m m 4-0 m m m 4-0m m L 0 Q m E a-0 m S U m CLm IL U N O N N (1) 00 > NH L I� N > m m 0 O 0 H N I� O � O Q0 m 0 0 0 O 0 I� O I� ':1- O RI - 00 O 00 3 ca 00 ca O 00 O 00 3 � Q0 r --i 0 00 � E ri ri m 0 0 0 00 N O H Q0 m 0 0 0 ':1- O RI - Ln O Ln ca 0 ca CO rq 3 O O r --i 0 00 N E ri ri m a Ln m o0 a� i cn tw .� 1 v070 cn C: m +� ii U L.L Os, °1 N � O V co Q0 t.6 M 0 r. cn LL awI t O i Q � E O O N V am s N aw U 'r. Os, °1 N � O rl Ln co Q0 t.6 rl 0 rl cn awL awI O � � O O CL Q N am U N N o H E -0O •L � Q 3 U O ate-+ O Q— 4— M L M r) —0 M rl Ln co Q0 t.6 rl 0 0 I� rl O I� lD rl 0 0 co Ln Ln t.6 r4 O V--1 M F Co cn — � � N O � O U N N LU M U � ate-+ U ., . r. F Q M N M O o o00 0 0 N Lo p o p O • O �0 0 N ° (0-\ o O i • �n O :a A o 0 °o _ 0 ° 0 \,6 o W 0 G% N O N c 00 c O U E o o� o 00 D00o 0 0 N N p O O O � N co 0 M O N c, p O ` G _ o bA N _LL o ' CA p p I N Ln O O � N N NO t" ', O •i N " \ o o N 00 o O O T U. 0 • 0 O ° O N p O Ln ry 0 OCA 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 1- 0 N O Q IuauzUJOA09 sajnlipuadxq % SL' aaiAJaS lgaQ JUJOu09 JO a � N � O � N LLL blo c N 4J V LCL L 4J 0 O M 0 0 O C O � co c anIPA pas, O O N • M A c 3assv ; R SP 11 jaQ '�o 0 0 0 N O O � 4 M n 000 N O 4 M N o 0 O CA O O N " 4 M Lo 0 01 N co O 4 c� N o 0 O N CO O N 0 0 O N O � 4 M N 000 N O " 4 M 00 00 N �n O � 4 M O N° 0 O� O N " 4 M O 0 N n O " 4 M N T U o• � O 4N No 4J N N • - 4-- O .� LL OCD a N OLL LLN I� n to O A I O 4 H LU 'WE N � M O N n M O00 C) LnG� 0 - ° °o 00 � °0�I- CA � � r) J 4- suoill!w ui N W � O 4- -C C) Ln II.I� suoi z ui ^ 4- $ l ) � U vI •; �. L N {f} o OCD A N V1 N W � O 4- -C C) Ln II.I� suoi z ui ^ 4- $ l ) � U vI •; �. L N o OCD A N V1 M - C�I4-- 4JL O U o' N °' �o • • � O V N��- •� LL s.—O LL n a O - I O � N NM O • O Nn N N W � O 4- -C C) Ln II.I� suoi z ui ^ 4- $ l ) � O ' N LI? N W \ " O Co U � . r+ CN C) " O � c N 0 O - CP U. z 0 N " o 0 O H E -0 O a) Ln O U O '� p -0 Ol N O N LL O N O N LL ca L bD O L N E N O L Q E ca ca U N Ln O 0- 0 O L N L O N as L Q O O m O c L V N t is N O N N i O .O E Ln N .� i i Q .� a Q N L O N as L Q O O m O c L V N t is N O N N i O .O E N .� i i Q .� a Q Q a -J N 0 m a -J N N N _0 Q =3 O m N _0 N N N O DC E I �_ }' O �u ,^ N O N ri N b.0 Q O L 05 t LL _ O 4-J O O = N CL O o aJ O n O }; a -J O m � +J cin D �• .� � U O E U O Q O D v U OO .N .N O .N cai cai cai N L O N as L Q O O m O c L V N t is N O N N i O .O E `LJ U U Ul i` • i G ii G Q Q CCC6 G CCC6 G O W W W N a U r_ i O 1..11 l�A m r c6 m O a--+ Q s� W O U QO O O O bn 0bn n , rlj N ri NO a", O pp ateJ m W...� r -I O +N -+4-j bn ...� . Q m bn U Q O ri r4O LL C O m m M O Ica a a r ate., ra ate-+ r i Ol O �+ I E O X MX � Q -o -0LL `O ~E H oC x -0 Q ca N ca O p O v 'X ~ c6 X N Ol O Q LU X H O rn r -I O N Q N ca E _0 Q c m a c m a O c au au O c O au b ca an s +-+ U U +_+ U U +_+ U a) ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 Resolution approving an amendment to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would change the future land use designation of four (4) parcels south of Colonial Avenue, between 4904 Colonial Avenue and 4920 Colonial Avenue, from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition; Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and adoption of a resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use designation of four (4) properties along Colonial Avenue from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. BACKGROUND: At its January 2nd meeting, the Roanoke County Planning Commission voted to advertise a public hearing on amending the County's Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of four (4) parcels along Colonial Avenue from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition This Comprehensive Plan amendment is linked to the Balzer & Associates, Inc. rezoning petition from R-1 to C-1 for three (3) properties along Colonial Avenue DISCUSSION: The Comprehensive Plan is a planning document that reflects the community's goals and visions of what the future might be. It is a blueprint for the future growth and development of the County over the next 20 years. It provides direction and guidance, Page 1 of 2 for both the public and private sectors, in making decisions about land development, public services and resource protection. The County's Future Land Use Map and Guide serve as a reference for all citizens on the most desirable locations for future land use activities throughout the County. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Appropriate land use types include attached and detached single family housing, neighborhood institutional centers such as parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, community meeting areas and clubs, and low impact neighborhood commercial services. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Transition areas are suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. One citizen spoke during the public hearing. She requested that her property and residence not be included in the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission discussed the purpose of Transition being a buffer between higher and lower intensity uses, traffic on Colonial Avenue, the commercial encroachment into residential areas, where the extent of the Transition expansion along Colonial Avenue should be located, the Colonial Avenue Corridor Study, previous rezonings along Colonial Avenue, and having transition areas adjacent to the Core future land use areas. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution amending the future land use designation of three (3) properties along Colonial Avenue from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use designation of three (3) properties along Colonial Avenue from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. Page 2 of 2 2:°4�°A" ROANOKE COUNTY v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5204 Bernard Drive, Second Floor, P.O. Box 29800 1838 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2080 TarekMoneir, FAX: (540) 776-7155 BUILDING PERMITS/INSPECTIONS ACTING DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Philip Thompson, ENGINEERING ACTING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING & ZONING TRANSPORTATION Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Philip Thompson, AICP Acting Director of Planning DATE: January 31, 2019 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Colonial Avenue At the Roanoke County Planning Commission's January 2nd meeting, the Commission made a motion to advertise a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the County's Comprehensive Plan for February 5, 2019. The proposed amendment would change the future land use designation of four (4) parcels south of Colonial Avenue, between 4904 Colonial Avenue and 4920 Colonial Avenue, from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. The Comprehensive Plan is a planning document that reflects the community's goals and visions of what the future might be. It is a blueprint for the future growth and development of the County over the next 20 years. It provides direction and guidance, for both the public and private sectors, in making decisions about land development, public services and resource protection. The County's Future Land Use Map and Guide serve as a reference for all citizens on the most desirable locations for future land use activities throughout the County. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Appropriate land use types include attached and detached single family housing, neighborhood institutional centers such as parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, community meeting areas and clubs, and low impact neighborhood commercial services. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Transition areas are suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Information on the properties involved in the proposed amendment as well as the surrounding properties is included below. Properties included in Proposed Amendment Tax Map Number Property Owner(s) Approx. Lot Size 086.08-02-22.00-0000 Mehdi Kazemi 0.80 acre 086.08-02-22.01-0000 Mehdi Kazemi 0.18 acre 086.08-02-22.02-0000 Mehdi Kazemi 0.18 acre 086.08-02-23.00-0000 Jeffry & Nancy Spillman 1.36 acres Tax Map Number Existing Land Use Zoning Future Land Use 086.08-02-22.00-0000 Single Family Home R-1* Neighborhood Conservation 086.08-02-22.01-0000 Vacant R-1* Neighborhood Conservation 086.08-02-22.02-0000 Vacant R-1* Neighborhood Conservation 086.08-02-23.00-0000 Single Family Home R-1 Neighborhood Conservation * Proposed Rezoning from R-1 to C-1 Surrounding Properties Direction from Site Existing Land Use Zoning Future Land Use North Kroger Grocery Store, C -2C, C -1C & R-1 Core & Transition Office, Single Family Home South Single Family Homes R-1 Neighborhood Conservation East Single Family Homes R-1 Neighborhood Conservation West Verizon Building, C-1 & C-2CS Core Bojangles Copies of several maps (aerial, zoning, and the existing and proposed future land use maps) are attached, as well as information regarding the Transition and Neighborhood Conservation future land use designations. If you have any questions, please contact me by phone at (540) 772-2029 or by email at pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov. PGT:pt Attachments 2 Neighborhood Conservation: A future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Land Use Types: Single -Family Residential - Attached and detached housing at a reasonable density that is not significantly higher than the existing neighborhood. Infill lots or community re -development should be designed to be sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood but can be at reasonably higher density. New single-family residential developments should incorporate greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Cluster developments are encouraged. Neiizhborhood Institutional Centers - Uses that serve the neighborhood residents including parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, recreational and park facilities, community meeting areas and clubs. These facilities should be linked to the residential areas by greenways, bike trails and pedestrian paths. Neighborhood Commercial - Low impact services to serve the local neighborhood that are consistent with the Community Plan design guidelines. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited density residential subdivisions have been platted and developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where limited density residential zoning has been established. EXPANSION AREAS - Locations where the expansion of the existing development pattern is logical. INFILL DEVELOPMENT - Locations where infill areas complement the surrounding development pattern. ACCESS - Locations served by a local street system. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. Transition: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Land Use Types: Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings are encouraged. A high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design is encouraged. Retail - Small-scale planned and clustered retail uses. Multifamily Residential - Garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. Single -Family Attached Residential - Planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre. Parks - Public and private recreational facilities. These facilities should be linked to residential areas by greenways, bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited commercial uses exist. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. SURROUNDING LAND USE - Locations which serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use patterns. ORIENTATION - Locations which are physically oriented toward the major street. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. HAZEL W 0 CW G � a W J W z °° 0 0 341S ,� NNI1 S 0 N 0% O00 'yb�I g 0 Q 0 �O .. •L •L C(Z CN o o j o o N U 0 � ° z o Nplg o r N J U U Ig�b� g a 0 � 0 CL N HAZEL W 0 CW G W � J a W zca 0 0 341S ,�NNI1 S 0 N 0% O00 'yb�I C(Z 0 0L(D 0 CN 0 V) LO c 0 0 U 0 0 LO oCN c 0 LL 0 0 0 p) J z U c � N D x D W H HAZEL W 0 CW G W � J a W zca 0 0 U341S,1NNns 0 N O► O0,'yb �j C(Z c g W O ECN O c N LO W c E O O U O a � O v`O o L, CN V) L O 0 O N N II O W z U N D 0 CL H HAZEL W 0 CW G V a W J W z °° 0 0 341S,�NN ns O N 0% O00 'yb�I _ W <lz E 0 W a o N 0 LO v � a) N 0 0 LO L, J U LL. N 0 0 c V) o 0 E E 0 u J z F o U U D CL H AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2019 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THREE PROPERTIES ON COLONIAL AVENUE (IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO TRANSITION WHEREAS, § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission of every jurisdiction shall prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical development of their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, § 15.2-2230 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission shall review the comprehensive plan at least once every five years to determine whether it is advisable to amend the plan; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Comprehensive Plan be amended, changing the future land use designation of three (3) parcels south of Colonial Avenue, from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. The three properties, all of which are located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, are: 1) 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.02-0000), 2) 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.01-0000), and 3) 4920 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.00-0000); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on February 5, 2019, after posting, advertisement and notices as required by § 15.2-2225 and § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) The Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors amend the Comprehensive Plan, changing the future land use designation of the following parcels from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition: A. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.02-0000), B. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.01-0000), and C. 4920 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.00-0000). 2) Pursuant to § 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary to the Planning Commission shall certify this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors by providing a copy of it to the Clerk to the Board. 3) Pursuant to § 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary to the Planning Commission shall also post this Resolution on the Commission's website. Commissioners absent None Votes in favor Bower, Henderson, James, Mahoney, Woltz Votes against None Abstentions None CERTIFICATION The undersigned secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Commission does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, complete and correct Resolution adopted by a vote of a majority of the Roanoke County Planning Commissioners, present at a regular meeting of the Commission held on February 5, 2019, at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, and that the same has not been amended or rescinded and is in full force and effect as of the of this certification, February , 2019. Philip Pompson, Secrel6ry, Roan ke County Planning Commission AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THREE PROPERTIES LOCATED ON COLONIAL AVENUE (IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO TRANSITION WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2233 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission of every jurisdiction shall prepare and recommend a Comprehensive Plan for the physical development of their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2230 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission shall review the Comprehensive Plan at least once every five years to determine whether it is advisable to amend the plan; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Comprehensive Plan be amended, changing the future land use designation of three (3) parcels south of Colonial Avenue from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. The three properties, all of which are located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, are: 1. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.02-0000); and 2. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.01-0000); and 3. 4920 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.00-0000). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on February 5, 2019, after posting, advertisement and notices as required by Section 15.2-2225 and Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia. Page 1 of 2 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke as follows: 1. The Board approves amending the Comprehensive Plan, changing the future land use designation of the following parcels from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition: a. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.02-0000); and b. 0 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.01-0000); and c. 4920 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.00-0000). 2. Pursuant to Section 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary of the Planning Commission certified this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors by providing a copy of it to the Clerk to the Board. 3. Pursuant to Section 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary of the Planning Commission posted this Resolution on the Commission's website. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc. to rezone approximately 1. 17 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District for a medical office, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances to rezone three (3) properties from residential to commercial. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking to use the property for a medical office. A medical office is not a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district but is a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district. Design Guidelines for development and redevelopment were developed for Colonial Avenue in 2000. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. Three citizens spoke against the request during the public hearing. The concerns expressed were an increase in traffic and related traffic issues, hours of operation, increase in trash from commercial properties, increase in existing drainage/flooding in that area, the overall size and location of the building and concerns about the impact on Page 1 of 2 property values. The Planning Commission discussed the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines as they relate to the concept plan, had specific questions about the location of the parking areas, and the submitted TIA. The applicant explained the layout of the parking areas and how the TIA warrants/results would be worked through during the site plan review process. The applicant also clarified that the hours of operation for the intended medical office use (sleep center) were not going to be 24 hours a day as previously thought. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1 to C- 1 with the two proffered conditions: 1. Concept Plan Conformance. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building - Development Plan" (Exhibit A) prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018 subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. 2. Building Design. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medial Office Building" prepared by Motter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to rezone approximately 1. 17 acres from R-1 to C-1 with the two proffered conditions. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Balzer and Associates, Inc. Request: To rezone approximately 1.17 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C- 1, Low Intensity Commercial, District, to construct a medical office Location: 4920 Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring Proffered Conditions 1. Concept Plan Conformance. The owner hereby proffers substantial (Proposed): conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building — Development Plan" (Exhibit A) prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018 subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. 2. Building Design. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building" prepared by Motter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Balzer and Associates, Inc., agent for the property owner, is requesting to rezone three (3) parcels totaling approximately 1. 17 acres in size from R-1, Low Density Residential, District, to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue. The submitted concept plan shows the development of a two story, 11,500 square foot office building, with required parking areas and a Type B landscape buffer. This site is designated Neighborhood Conservation on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The proposed project is not consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation land use designation. There is a request from the Planning Commission to amend the future land use designation from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highways oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Appropriate land use types within transition areas are planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings, small-scale planned and clustered retail uses and planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre or garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. The proposed project would be consistent with the Transition land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines Medical Office as "use of a site for facilities which provide diagnoses, minor surgical care and outpatient care on a routine basis, but which does not provide overnight care or serve as a base for an ambulance service. Medical offices are operated by doctors, dentists, or similar practitioners listed by the Commonwealth of Virginia". A medical office is not a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district, but is a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district. The purpose of the C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District "is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county- wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office and commercial development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office and commercial uses. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses." (See attached Section 30-53. C-1, District Regulations). If approved, a Type B landscape buffer yard is required between C-1, Low Intensity Commercial Districts and R-1, Low Density Residential Districts, as stated in Section 30-92-6 (attached). The applicant will be required to meet this requirement during the comprehensive site development review process. Exhibit B has been submitted with this application showing the buffer requirement, as well as adjacent right-of-way and parking lot landscaping requirements. The Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines are recommendations for property and business owners to develop their sites to follow standards specific to the Colonial Avenue Corridor. The goal of these standards is to plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along Colonial Avenue. The applicant is proffering two conditions: substantial conformance with the submitted concept plan and building elevations. The concept plan indicates numerous conditions which are in accordance with the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines: signage, landscaping, screening and buffering, exterior lighting and terraced parking areas. However, there are elements of the site development that are not in accordance with the design guidelines. This includes parking areas located in the front of the building, adjacent to Colonial Avenue and the non -preservation of the existing residential structure. In addition, elements of the building elevations and design are in compliance with the design guidelines. This includes the use of materials in the range of earth tones and architectural design incorporating design entrances, scale and roof type. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Property — The site currently consists of three separate parcels: 4920 Colonial Avenue (TM#: 086.08-02- 22.00-0000) and two, 0 Colonial Avenue (086.08-02-22.02-0000 and 086.08-02-22.01-0000). The site contains a one and one-half story single-family dwelling, paved driveway and an accessory garage in the rear yard. If approved, the single-family dwelling, accessory garage, and driveway will be removed. Topography/Vegetation — The front yard adjacent to Colonial Avenue rises sharply at about 8 vertical feet from the road to a parallel row of mature evergreen trees. The grassed site slopes moderately uphill towards the single-family dwelling and paved driveway and parking area in the rear yard. There are existing deciduous trees located in between the row of evergreen trees in the front and the existing single-family dwelling. Mature maple trees, approximately 30 feet tall, line the eastern property line. The existing 300 long asphalt driveway leads to a parking area and 900 square foot accessory garage/building. There is no significant vegetation along the south and west property lines. Surrounding Neighborhood — Adjacent properties to the north are zoned C -2C, High Intensity Commercial with conditions and include the Kroger and CVS retail sales use type buildings. Properties to the east and south are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, District, and include single family residential homes. The property to the west is zoned C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District, and contains the Bell Atlantic/C&P 2 Telephone Company building. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture - The concept plan submitted with the application shows the construction of a two story building, with an overall square footage of 11,500. The building will be situated in the front third of the site in between two parking lots. There are a total of three terraced parking lots proposed for the entire site. The site will be accessed from a single commercial entrance on Colonial Avenue, located along the eastern property line. Proposed building elevations have been submitted with the application. The concept plans shows a Type B landscape buffer yard along the eastern and southern property lines which is required between R-1 and C-1 zoned properties. Additional landscaping is shown adjacent to Colonial Avenue and throughout the proposed development. Required parking and additional landscaping requirements will be addressed during the comprehensive site plan review process. Additional development features proposed are a seven foot wide and 5 foot tall monument sign, exterior building and pole mounted lighting measuring fourteen feet in height. These details will be finalized during the site plan review process, however as listed on the proffered concept plan. The applicant has proffered the concept plan, which contains building and parking lot orientation, access to the site, exterior lighting details and landscaping. In addition, the building elevations were also proffered. Community Meeting — A Community Meeting was held on January 17, 2019, at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Approximately 7 people attended the meeting. The major concerns/comments included the exiting traffic problems that exist on Colonial Avenue; general comment regarding the size of the development not being consistent with the area; concerns about the existing drainage issues in this area, how will this proposed development address additional drainage and run-off concerns, and the timeframe of construction. Agency Comments: The following comments were provided by various agencies on this request: Economic Development — Economic Development supports the proposed rezoning request "to develop a medical office building on Colonial Avenue. The proposed use is consistent with adjacent commercial uses, supports the County's economic development goals, and is located within an established commercial corridor. The project incorporates Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines, which are compatible with and complimentary to area uses". Building Safety — The Office of Building Safety stated: "all construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code". Fire & Rescue — This agency does not object to this project, however it will be subjected to fire flow and access requirements. Roanoke County General Services- This commercial property would be eligible for County provided solid waste collection. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) — The site/property fronts directly on Colonial Avenue which is a publicly owned and maintained street. VDOT's comments include the requirement of a Land Use Permit for a new entrance or a change in the use of an existing entrance. In addition, commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance regulations must be adhered to. VDOT will require further review and justification for the traffic impact analysis during the development review phase, which is required. This further review if due to the noted left turn lane warrant being 3 met but no turn lane proposed. Comprehensive site plan review is required, as well as review of the existing drainage system. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN This site is designated Neighborhood Conservation on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The proposed project is not consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. There is a request to amend the future land use designation to Transition, Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highways oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Appropriate land use types within transition areas are planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings, small-scale planned and clustered retail uses and planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre or garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. The proposed project would be consistent with the Transition future land use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Balzer and Associates, Inc., agent for the property owner, is requesting to rezone three parcels approximately 1. 17 acres in size from R-1, Low Density Residential, District, to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue. The submitted concept plan shows the development of a two-story, 11,500 square foot office building, with required parking areas and a Type B landscape buffer. The Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines recommends conditions to achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along Colonial Avenue. The applicant has submitted two proffered conditions with this application: substantial conformance with the submitted concept plan and building elevations. Both documents address the Colonial Avenue Design recommendations. These conditions address landscaping, signage, exterior lighting, parking design and layout, building design including materials and colors and serve to mitigate adverse impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood. The site is designated Neighborhood Conservation on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. There is a request from the Planning Commission to amend the future land use designation to Transition. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, the proposed rezoning does conform to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request with the following proffered conditions: Concept Plan Conformance. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building — Development Plan" (Exhibit A) prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018 subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. E Building Design. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building" prepared by Motter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018. CASE NUMBER: 6-212019 PREPARED BY: Rebecca James HEARING DATES: PC: 215119 BOS: 2126119 ATTACHMENTS: Application Aerial Map Zoning Map Land Use Map R-1 Low Density Residential District Standards C-1 Low Intensity Commercial District Standards Screening and Landscaping Standards Design Guidelines for the Colonial Avenue Corridor Neighborhood Conservation Future Land Use Designation Transition Future Land Use Designation County of Roanoke A Community Development k Planning & Zoning 0 5204 Bernard Drive rasa P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 �z- JSQ31-1� For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/$g-f, d te: :3�/� Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number OU 9 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) [2r Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver D Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip Phone: 540.772.9580 Balzer & Associates, Inc. c/o Pen Crew (Agent) Work: 540.772.9580 1208 Corporate Circle Cell #: n a Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax No.: 540.397.0543 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: MEHDI KAZEMI Work: 4996 FOX RIDGE ROAD Fax No. #: ROANOKE, VA 24018 Property Location Cave Spring Magisterial District: p g 4920 COLONIAL AVENE Community Planning area: Cave Spring ROANOKE, VA 24018 Tax Map No.: 086.08-0222.00-0000 086.08-02-22.02Zoning: xisting Sin le FamilyResidential 086.08-02-22.01-0000 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.17 AC, Existing Land Use: Residential REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RIS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) w/conditions Proposed Land Use: Medical Office Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes S No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes i� No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes iPq No ❑ VAALANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (V!W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to > the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACC D IF A OF T rEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. DEC 1 4 201 t/S/W/CP V/AA R/SIW/CP VIAA R/S/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x I V concept plait App o + mlyl]j Developmenl Application Metes and bounds description Prof , applicable JustificationE�ji Water and sewer application Adjoin perty owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and aan ac�ekne,and consent fthe owner.Owner' 2 1-7 JUSTIFICATION FOR.REZONING, SPECIAL USE.PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See attached Narrative Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. See attached Narrative Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. See attached narrative 3 NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REZONING REQUEST: Statement of Justification I ) The purpose of this zoning request is to allow a medical office building use on three existing tax parcels as identified in the application as 086.08-02-22.00, 086.08-02-22.01, and 089.08-02-22.02 totaling approximately 1.17 acres. The existing parcels are currently zoned as Rl- Residential and this request is being made to rezone to Cl- (Low Intensity Commercial District) with proffered conditions. The subject parcels are located along Colonial Avenue and adjacent to a variety or commercial and residential properties. The proposed architectural and civil design incorporates the design guidelines of the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance and more importantly includes the Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines. The proposed project provides compatibility and an enduring community image through the architectural building style, development patterns and orientation, landscaping, signage, access, and limited parking. This request furthers the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance by providing an appropriate office use within an urban service area which serves the community and County -wide needs. The proposed location along Colonial Avenue and near Brambleton Avenue provides development adjacent to an established commercial corridor. The subject parcels are bordered on two sides by commercial zoning including C2 and Cl zoned parcels. Residential properties are located to the south and east. Design elements and considerations have been provided with the request to create a positive transition between the high intensity commercial of Brambleton Avenue and the residential along the interior of Colonial Avenue. The proffered civil development plan shows the overall development pattern to support the Medical Office use of the site. The proposed building will be situated in the front third of the site while smaller terraced parking lots are proposed for the patients and staff parking. The parking areas have been broken up to lessen their visual and environmental impacts. The site will be accessed from a single commercial entrance on Colonial Avenue. Extensive buffering including solid screening fence, earthern berms, and landscaping will be provided along the perimeter of the property lines that borders residentially zoned property. The proposed medical office building will be compatible with the surrounding residential character. The proposed building will have a (2) two story facade along Colonial Avenue and a (1) one story fa�adc along the back of the building. The overall square footage will be limited to 11,500 s.f. +/-. The building exterior will consist of traditional building materials outlined in the proffered architectural elevations. Covered entries are provided to provide additional interest in the fagade and practical entry points during inclement weather. 2) The proposed uses conform to the general guidelines and policies contained within the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, which encourages commercial growth in appropriate locations. The plan will allow for an appropriate small-scale office development that will, not only provide real estate tax revenue, but will also provide needed convenient medical services to Roanoke County residents. At the subject location, the planned improvements will act as a valuable transition from the surrounding higher intensity commercial uses. The proposed project is located within the Cave Spring Community Planning District and will promote and enhance the intent of this community by providing compatible architectural design, compatible signage and extensive landscaping while providing essential services for the community. 3) No negative impacts to Roanoke County infrastructure are anticipated with this development as outlined with specifies below. A single monument sign has been proposed along Colonial Avenue for patients way - finding in an attractive and well-placed location on-site. The proposed monument sign as proffered will be a maximum of 7' wide and 5' tall. The scale of the sign provides continuity and sensitivity to the Colonial Avenue corridor while maintaining appropriate identification for patrons. Exterior building and pole mounted lighting will be a maximum of 14' in height to meet Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines and this has also been proffered. Extensive and complimentary landscaping will be provided to ensure an appealing facility along with appropriate buffers from adjacent land uses. A 25' wide Type B landscape buffer yard has been provided along the southern and eastern property lines. This buffer will contain a 6' solid screening fence for it's entire length along with a 3-4' tall berm, and various evergreen and deciduous plant materials. The single proposed access to Colonial Avenue will provide both ingress and egress from the site eliminating multiple entrances along Colonial Avenue and consolidating traffic to one access point. Fire and Rescue access has been provided with the design including appropriate turning areas for rescue vehicles. All improvements will be planned and constructed in accordance with Roanoke County, Western Virginia Water Authority (W.V.W.A.), and Virginia Department of Transportation (V.D.O.T.) standards as applicable. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS x a. Applicant name and name of development x b. Date, scale and north arrow x c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions x d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties x c. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. x f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties x g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights x i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development x j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMITAPPLICANTS X k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers X in. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals x n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections x o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants x p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed x/a q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. iYJP 12/12/18 Signature ofapplican Date oaH k c Community Development W.. Planning & zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date; April 19, 2005 %A0AiV0 0 fico Community Development z °` Planning & Zoning Division z 3 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional infonnation and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of'this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date; April 19, 2005 NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Name of Petition �P Petitioner's SiiArure 12/12/18 Date NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REZONING REOUEST: The following proffered conditions are provided for the above referenced Zoning Req uest Proffered Conditions: 1. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building — Development Plan" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018 subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. 2. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building" prepared by Matter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018, Property Owner: Mehdi Kazemi Printed: Mehdi Kazemi Title Property Owner Date : 12/12/18 Li z 0 0 = o LJLiU O �z I I--� o Q U N U � I-- g of z z�Q oz 0 J cp N W W 00 Y CO Q W Q n Y Q X W Q U A ON <SH 00 o \ w z 0 0 = o LJLliU O Jz I Q U N U � I-- g of z z�Q oz 0 J cp N W W 00 Y m Q W Q n Y Q X W Q U Q . Qr � N e1 4A LLJ Q J A 0N a 1 Z Q ° . > f ° _ rl 13 � _ 0— a� p a� a Aplk i 00 o \ w z 0 0 = o LJLliU O Jz I Q U N U � I-- g of z z�Q oz 0 J cp N W W 00 Y m Q W Q n Y Q X W Q U Q J w V F � V) z ~ p � _ 0— p D L W -H 4t IY J .4 e 4 • 4 . ' 00 o \ w z 0 0 = o LJLliU O Jz I Q U N U � I-- g of z z�Q oz 0 J cp N W W 00 Y m Q W Q n Y Q X W Q U NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REZONING REQUEST: B&A Joh 4: 04180109.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING New Lot 1, containing 0.1893 acre, New Lot 2, containing 0.1813 acres and New Lot 3, containing 0.8053 acres, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, being known as 4920 Colonial Avenue, and shown on plat showing subdivision of "Property of William F. Richards & Steven L. Nash, DB 1691, PG 1624, creating hereon New Lot 1, 0.1893 Ac; Lot 2, 0.1813 Ac & Lot 3, 0.8053 Ac." Prepared by Timothy Hoelzle, Land Surveyor, dated April 5, 2007, of record in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, as Instrument NO. 200705416. BEING the same property conveyed to Mehdi Kazemi by deed dated November 9, 2018 recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No. 201811069. L �� �777[[[liiRii SAMP6 Mr F IMP LIr r MLR YI s W-zm edllJWMYL4 :� Vit§;' .SIS.!•d h NOT ATo SCAM - 3 - _ G/tlT:l18WKN - � Gi i . �� SG171➢AFY CW®Dliip z p L _ ��pAgnNI�MtRIIVFN /M MI �lR ,"ff� q, Lj3�' IaaI��ARtLX��R�M*8Yu.L_ �1ANa(y��� M'YtA]IESW[4iisd22!_�Lv cv�klAL A.�E' _ - dG�i[LL��.. �yy. 5& � RTC d>20 awes 9� 9 5 P.''. `•` S '. BNEtlre `� { j OIOY3 AC.s '� ly tt2�� _ uY",A f�•.. �j�,. YKiY`�L �LML NNi[M�If 6r}lee9K gL•I_.1nN'I�pa4 �. dt�ii x �.�.�r .1�����Lt!� .. - ..AYLlL_.aU KaW'P'>•c1�=prc6�� 4� [J� 'Q'd' VA,.'� 4� p� 5 �,�i, .. _ _ PwcR:u. ��ntu,' Mvaai_3'f5e xcEvo-voov avg _. �' � - •aW yy _ •'ITtlS PCFT G" CCRi9E1CRd1 SVPEAC£OES • ' � IS GRAPHSC 5CAl,f.' - a y er `x'� r n� _ FECORDR Q"RDAPp.'£ C011AIiY, Nt]GWtA �g g r. x[�e xuttrmr v - .pLAi � .� Pmu rm.ia SNveMU SP901N9q`! OWN (699 00 -PPRP ; �Yr A. M111e'RIlRIIVFiOfAI®YRN iFPYiP OFA 101 aL gO0A '� # IIILM I F. RICIIAIi1JS A. . - �prmvDat na'a41�'P4'L s'eaaw.r��u +rw.rorm',twno § OAMIrtVI,IMl Ew9a IlM w[ r _ Sf8Y6N L NASN T69;, Y i ( i, y 5 ,.. E' - 1'Cs9Yf ✓YA-rtEI: 11 Fde �Fv)�vR19l�w'1 %c>rseRY 2 i- I`MYW a3lY�FNl9t v i[ �y� M6 s '��c*A Asw lMs ' W (i >o!m mirF aaMR lf, a•10 fRE1 Nrw Gf7T ! D E'6oD Ac LwT a GT ZD0 rlpd00 Ac. ' { V x ae itm.xap'r pwo Air:' RAK'sBxH+c��MAL,msiprsr �- ., r� NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING REZONING REQUEST: Ad'acent Property Owners of 3 Three Sub'ect Parcels: Tax Map #: 086.08-02-22.00-0000, 086.08-02-22.01-0000, 086.08-02-22.01-0000 N/F Owner: Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Property Address: 4938 Colonial Avenue Tax Parcel: 086.08-02-21.00-0000 Zoning: C I N/F Owner: Arnold Lee Wheeler Life Estate Property Address: 4801 Leawood Circle Tax Parcel: 086.08-02-11.00-0000 Zoning: RI N/F Owner: Connie Waddell; Randolph Waddell Property Address: 4785 Sunny Side Drive Tax Parcel: 086.08-02-24.00-0000 Zoning: RI N/F Owner: Jeffrey L Spillman; Nancy R Spillman Property Address: 4904 Colonial Avenue Tax Parcel: 086.08-02-23.00-0000 Zoning: R1 N/F Owner: Christopher A Desimone ;Laura A Desimone Property Address: 4923 Colonial Avenue Tax Parcel: 086,08-01-01.00-0000 Zoning: C 1 C N/F Owner: Kroger Limited Partnership I Property Address: 4404 Brambleton Avenue Tax Parcel: 086.08-01-04.00-0000 Zoning C2C TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NEW COLONIAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 4920 Colonial Avenue County of Roanoke, VA 24018 B&A PROJECT #04180109.00 DATE: December 14, 2018 BARER 6[ ASSOCIATES PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone (540) 772-9580 Introduction: This traffic study is being provided to analyze the projected traffic generation and turn lane/taper analysis for a proposed medical office building located at 4920 Colonial Avenue (Route 687) within the County of Roanoke, Virginia. The proposed medical office building will have an overall square footage of approximately 11,500 s.f. and is anticipated to one single user as a medical office. Existing Daily and Peak Hour Traffic: 2017 VDOT published data (please see Attachment 1). Colonial Avenue (Route 687) AADT = 11,000 Directional Factor = 0.692 K Factor = 0.098 Total Peak Hour Trips: 1,078 746 Trips per Hour in Peak Direction Existing Peak Hour Traffic Data 746 vph (332 vph) 4 Colonial Avenue WB Colonial Avenue EB 332 vph (746 vph) KEY 00 vph =AM PH SITE (00 vph) = PM PH Existina and Proposed Site Generated Traffic: The trip generation calculations were based on the proposed land use shown on the civil site plan prepared by Balzer and Associates (please see Attachment 2). The policies and procedures found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, were employed to determine the potential site generated traffic volumes for the proposed development. Traffic volumes for the V average weekday and weekday peak hours of the adjacent street traffic are provided and illustrated in the Table and Figure below, respectively. Note that the trip general calculation below references the proposed building of 11,500 s.f. +/- of medical office. Proposed Trip Generation: Medical Office Use 3 Tarn -Lane and Taper Requirements: For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that all vehicles will access the site from Colonial Avenue, as this is the only point of access by vehicles to the site. The analyses to determine turn lane warrants on Colonial Avenue to serve the proposed development were completed by following the procedures and methodologies found in the VDOT Road Design Manual, Volume 1, Appendix F. Ri ht -Turn Lane into Site from Colonial Avenue AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 17 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Colonial Avenue - Approach Volume = 332 VPH Colonial Avenue -- Right Turn lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix C: No improvements required (please see Attachment 3). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 8 Vehicles per Hour Turning Right into site from Colonial Avenue - Approach Volume = 746 VPH Colonial Avenue -- Right Turn lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix C: No improvements required (please see Attachment 3). Left -Turn Lane into Site from Colonial Avenue: AM Peak Hour Analysis: - 8 Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Colonial Avenue - Approach Volume = 746 VPH Colonial Avenue -- Right Turn lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix C: Left Turn Lane Required (please see Attachment 4). PM Peak Hour Analysis: - 3 Vehicles per Hour Turning Left into site from Colonial Avenue - Approach Volume = 332 VPH Colonial Avenue -- Right Turn lane Requirement, as per VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix C: No improvements required (please see Attachment 4). n Summary: Based on the data provided, the assumptions made, and the potential site generated traffic, the results of the analysis are: • No Right turn lanes or tapers are required along Colonial Avenue. • Attachment #4 indicates the need for a left turn lane in the Am peak hour. However, I would provide the following information that indicates the existing Colonial Avenue corridor will still operate in an appropriate fashion provided the following: o The chart used indicates a design speed of 40 MPH. The speed limit on Colonial Avenue is 35 MPH along this section of Roadway. o The chart also provides for a minimum of 5% of advancing volume as a factor during the peak hour, but the proposed project is between 2-3% and as there is no lower chart therefore we have utilized the subject chart as a reference. The traffic summary has been provided to analyze the background traffic regarding the proposed improvements with the proposed development of the New Colonial Medical Office Building. 5 419/2018 38 ATTACHMENT 1: Virqinia Department of Transportation Traffic Fngineerinq Division 2017 Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume Estimates By Section of Route Roanoke Maintenance Area Route Length AADT 4A 4Tire Bus ---------------Truck--------------- 2Axle 3+Axle 1 Trail 2Trail QC K Factor Dir OK Factor AAWDT QW Year Roanoke County, 80-720 Colonial Avc 682 Manassas Dr 0.65 2300 R NA NA 02/07/2013 T^ US 221 Brambleton Ave US 221 S, Brambleton Avc gg2 Garst Mill Rd 0.24 11000 G 99% 0% 0% 09/c 0% 0 % F 0.103 0.646 12000 G 2017 r^- 80-1658 Cresihill Dr 80-1658 Crest Hilt Dr 682 Garst Mill Rd 0.43 8600 G 991/c 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% C 0.106 0.514 9400 G 2017 h.,��, 80-1361 Hafevan Rd 882 Garst Mill Rd 0.77 7000 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.109 0.537 7700 G 2017 T" SCL Roanoke � Dcad End ggg Sparks Rd 0.12 20 R NA NA 01/15/2013 90-613 Merriman Rd 80-613 Merriman Rd 684 Token Rd 0.27 30 R NA NA 01/1 5120 1 3 Dead End n SR 419 S, Elcctric Rd gg5 Keagy Rd 0.19 4300 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.124 0.635 4700 G 2017 80-592 Sti arioaf Mtn Rd gg5 Keagy Rd 0.40 2000 R 0.114 0.5 NA 10/01/2015 885 Keagy Rd 1.33 Frryn. 3700 R NA NA 02/07/2013 SR 419 N,_Electm Rd Dead End 686 Grandin Rd Ext 0.97 560 R NA NA 02/07/2013 ;,�y 0.97 ME of Dead End 686 Grandin Rd Ext 0.18 690 R NA NA 02/07/2013 r�^ 80-1350 L nnson Dr 686 Grandin Rd Ext 0.23 1200 R NA NA 02/07/2013 T^ ao-59z 80-692 Sugar Loaf Mtn Rd sgg Grandin Rd Ext 0.55 1500 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% C 0.131 0.55 1600 G 2017 T" SR 4I9 Electric Rd US 221 Brambleton Rd Colonial Ave 0� 0.35 11000 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.098 0.692 12000 G 2017 T°' 80-720; Penn Forest Blvd 80-720 Colonial Ave 687 Penn Forest Blvd 0.63 5000 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 01/a 0% C 0.103 0.531 5500 G 2017 ;, 80- i 530 Kenwic.h i'nai i 6g7 Penn Forest Blvd 0.62 y, 6700 G 99% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% F 0.108 0.517 7300 G 2017 80-904 Starkey Rd 80-613 Merriman Rd 688 Cotton Hill Rd 2.07 560 G 99% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% F 0.105 0.574 610 G 2017 } 80-934 ShirtQlc Ridpc Rd ggg Cotton Hill Rd 0.17 ,ten 970 G 990/ 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% F 4.11 0.64 1000 G 2017 _ 80-888 R,-untrec Rd ggg Cotton Hill Rd 0.46 3200y G 99% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% C 01.116 0.628 3400 G 2017 US 221 Bent Mountain Rd —.180-692 MI Chestnut Rd ggg Roselawn Rd 0.85 1600 G 98% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.129 0.705 1700 G 2017 80-1537 Stce tcchasc Dr 689 Roselawn Rd 0.87 2500 G 98% 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% C 0.111 0.51 2800 G 2017 F,,,, 80- iO4 iii bncids i'cd ggg Roselawn Rd 0.71 1700 G 98% 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% F 0.109 0.79 1800 G 2017 US 221 Brambleton Rd 419/2018 38 Land Use: 720 Medical -Dental Office Building Description ATTACHMENT 2: A medical -dental office building is a facility that provides diagnoses and outpatient care on a routine basis but is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical and surgical care. One or more private physicians or dentists generally operate this type of facility. Clinic (.and Use 630) is a related use. Additional Data Time -of -day distribution data for this land use for a weekday, Saturday, and Sunday are presented in Appendix A. For the 19 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 9:30 and 10:30 a.m. and 2:15 and 3:15 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), Califomia, Connecticut, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 104, 109, 120, 157, 184, 209, 211, 253, 287, 294, 295, 304, 357, 384, 404, 407, 423, 444, 509, 601, 715, 867, 879, 901, 902, 908, 959, 972 Medical -Dental Office Building (720) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting[Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies' 28 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 24 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting lehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 34.80 9.14-10075 9.79 Data Plot and Eauation Medical -Dental Office Building (720) Vehicle Trip fi=nds vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. SettinglLocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 44 1000 Sq, Ft. GFA: 32 Directional Distribution: 78% entering, 22% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 9000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.78 0.85 - 14.38 1.28 Data Piot and Equation 5 4 x x x x x is X x x x )0 x X '� x `x x xX X On 5i1 100 X � 1000 Sq, Ft, GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.88 Ln{X) + 1.31 - - - - Average Rate R=- 0.90 Medical -Dental Office Building (720) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 65 1000 Sq, Ft. GFA: 28 Directional Distribution: 28% entering, 72% exiting ehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.46 0.25-8.86 1.58 Data Plot and Equation 606 X 500 w 400 X X a r II r 300 X 200 x X X XX X XX 100 X X XX x X X XX X X 00 50 100 Iso zoo X = 1000 Sq Ft GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: 7 = 3.39(X} f 2.02 R'= 0.73 120 100 D v °L 80 w ca W 60 z 0 40 Cr x a. 20 Right Turns: 17 Vehicles (AM) 8 Vehicles (PM) ATTACHMENT 3: NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED F-79 100 200 300 400 500 B00 700 PHV APPROACH TOTAL, VEHICLES PER HOUR Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adiustment for Riaht Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11 % for K x D will suffice When right turn facilities are warranted, see Figure 3-1 for design criteria. FIGURE 3-26 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2 -LANE HIGHWAY) Rev. 1115 PM ATTACHMENT 4: iiiiiii�i�iii�i-■wiiiiiiiiii' i ::::::::::.::os►�w■■i■■■■■■i■■Left Turns in VAStorage Length Required V 40 mph (Design Speed) ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■l■■n■■i■■■■w■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■iii■■■■I■■11'i■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■r!■!■■i■■i■{■■■■■►�■■ ■ EMM MEN ■■■■■■■■!■Aw■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■l■■■■■■L\ ■■■■■■■■■ i■■■■■■■ iiiii7iii�lwwwl �ww�liwl��li\viii■iil■■■w■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■ w 1 /■�rrlrrr!!!!!I-!!!!!.1■■i\■■i■■■Inww■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ :1o. 2 Toa 0L W 600 500 O 400 z o Baa ❑L 0- o 200 a > 100 t c v 200 400 600 800 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME (VPH) FIGURE 3-5 U 200 400 600 800 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME (VPH) FIGURE 3-6 F-61 3' ULoN a� 17 C:) � O r i T d LO Ji T•� o 0 LO ��.=t� � •.� �� N ^ o F, 0 o N fw (D 4k Y>i w� 0 N � D> -g Zz- N N Q 60 JO J p U V) N c o c0 0 N N U > O v _ Q E E E N N > 00 Q O U C O N �p Q N �O N 0- O� J Q c 0? ',F- E 0 DCC) O i5 Q c 0 T O N N Q z D0 Q O 0 O O N O O N d N LLJ Q O O a O .0 D- O D ol N m � w p p p X r� -- O N O C:Q O 0 Q 0 I R-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose. (A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low -middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § I£, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * R -I District Regulations Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * 2. Civic Uses Cemetery * 2 R -I District Regulations Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Golf Course * 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-41-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. K R -I District Regulations b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) El C-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See. 30-53-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the C-1 low intensity commercial district is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county -wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office and commercial development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office and commercial uses. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -family Dwelling * Two-family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Bed and Breakfast Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Communications Services Consumer Repair Services Personal Improvement Services Personal Services 2 C-1 District Regulations C-1 District Regulations Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Office Uses Laboratories 3. Commercial Uses Automobile Rental/Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food Restaurant, General Retail Sales 4. Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble Recycling Centers and Stations 5. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower K C-1 District Regulations Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, § 1, 4- 22-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816- 4, § 1, 6-28-16) Sec. 30-53-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one (1) street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. E C-1 District Regulations Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet. (D) Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11) Screening and Landscaping Standards Sec. 30-92-6. Applicability of Regulations and Requirements. (A) Screening, landscaping and buffer yards. Requirements of screening, landscaping and buffer yards between zoning districts shall be determined by using the following charts. See the buffer yard illustrations in the Roanoke County Design Handbook for more detail. 2. The zoning administrator shall have final review of all buffer yards and will determine whether more screening is necessary based on site specific information such as terrain. If the buffer yard area is smaller than the typical buffer yard section denoted in the following illustrations, the landscaping required shall equal a proportion of the typical buffer yard landscaping. Where a fraction is calculated, the number shall be rounded up to the next whole number. Adjoining Option 1 (Large Buffer, Minimal Landscaping) Option 2 (Smaller Buffer With More Landscaping/Screening) Site Zoning 20' buffer 15' buffer Zoning R-3 R-4 C-1 C-2 I-1 I-2 AG -3 D D D D D E AG -1 D D D D D E AR B B B or C B or C D E AV A A A A D E R-1 A A B C D E R-2 A A B C D E R-3 B B B D E R-4 A B D E PRD D E NC B C C-1 B C C-2 B B Type Option 1 (Large Buffer, Minimal Landscaping) Option 2 (Smaller Buffer With More Landscaping/Screening) A 20' buffer 15' buffer For every 75' consisting of: For every 75' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small deciduous trees (5) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12-14) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12-14) One row of large deciduous shrubs (16-18) 6' screening B 30' buffer 20' buffer For every 100' consisting of: For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of large deciduous trees (4) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24) 6' screening Screening and Landscaping Standards Type Option 1 (Large Buffer, Minimal Option 2 (Smaller Buffer With More Landscaping) Landscaping/Screening) C 40' buffer 30' buffer For every 100' consisting of: For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small deciduous trees (6) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24) 6' screening D 50' buffer 35' buffer For every 100' consisting of: For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of large deciduous trees (3) Two rows of small deciduous trees, two One row of small evergreen trees (6-7) different species (6-7 per row) 6' screening E 75' buffer 50' buffer For every 100' consisting of: For every 100' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of small evergreen trees (6) One row of small deciduous trees (7) One row of small deciduous trees (67) 6' screening (B) Adjacent right-of-way/street side plantings. Where a new or expanded development, or reconfigured parking area is proposed adjacent to a public street right-of-way, a planting strip shall be established between the parking areas and the adjacent right-of-way. The planting strip shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet. 2. Within this planting strip a minimum of one (1) large deciduous tree shall be planted every thirty (30) linear feet along the public street right-of-way. Small trees planted every twenty (20) linear feet, may be used where an overhead power line or other obstruction is present. In addition, a minimum of two (2) large shrubs shall be placed in the planting strip for every five (5) linear feet of frontage. This should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for illustrations. (C) Parking areas. New parking areas shall include planting islands and landscaped medians in combination with low impact design techniques that are planned, designed and located to channel traffic, facilitate storm water management, improve the appearance of parking areas and define and separate parking areas and aisles. In addition to accommodating vehicles, parking areas shall also provide for safe pedestrian and bicycle circulation. 2 Screening and Landscaping Standards 2. The integration of low impact design alternatives, including but not limited to bioretention areas, infiltration devices, grass swales, vegetated filter strips and permeable or pervious pavers are encouraged to address stormwater quality and quantity and to improve the appearance of the parking area, in accordance with the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Design Manual, as amended. 3. Islands. (See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for additional detail) a. Rows of parking shall be separated by a planting island or bioretention planting island at least every fifteen (15) spaces and islands shall also be placed at the end of each row. Islands shall be spaced throughout the parking area and have a minimum dimension of nine (9) feet in width by nineteen (19) feet in length of planting area. To protect the plant material from vehicular damage, the island must be delineated by a clear physical barrier such as concrete curbs or set landscaping timbers. b. A minimum of one (1) small deciduous tree with surrounding turf grass or other ground cover shall be required in all planting islands. 4. Landscaped medians. (See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for additional detail) a. Where double rows of parking are planned, large parking areas shall have one landscaped median for every fifty (50) parking spaces to provide visual relief. Each landscaped median shall run the length of a parking aisle and shall measure at least fifteen (15) feet wide. Where possible, landscaped medians shall be designed for every other parking aisle. b. Each landscaped median shall be planted with one (1) small deciduous tree and six large shrubs per 30 linear feet with a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at the time of planting. C. Landscaped medians shall include sidewalks measuring at least five (5) feet wide to facilitate safe pedestrian circulation to and from destination(s). d. Wherever possible, parking area lighting shall be installed in landscaped medians. Lighting shall not conflict with required trees. Additional landscaping. In addition to the above requirements, three (3) large shrubs for every fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be planted around the perimeter of and/or adjacent to the parking area. 6. Large paved areas. Paved areas greater than five hundred (500) square feet such as loading areas, that are not necessarily striped parking lots shall place one (1) Screening and Landscaping Standards planting island, as specified above for every seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of area and at least one (1) landscaped median. Landscaped medians and planting islands shall be located to screen the paved area from the public right-of-way or from adjacent properties, to channel traffic, and/or to define separate parking areas. The landscaped median shall not be required to have a sidewalk. 7. Parking area expansions. Any expansion of a parking area shall require compliance with the requirements above for both the existing parking area and the proposed parking expansion. Exceptions are listed as follows: a. Expansions of ten (10) percent or less calculated by existing parking area square footage. b. The existing parking area may remain unchanged if all proposed parking spaces meet the landscaping requirements and are constructed of permeable or pervious pavers. See the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Design Manual for standards and specifications. (D) Parking structures. Parking structures located underground shall not be required to provide planting islands or landscaped medians within the parking structure. 2. Parking structures located above -ground shall not be required to provide planting islands or landscaped medians within the parking structure but shall provide: a. Landscaping around all sides of the structure for screening, or b. Integrate landscaping into all exposed structure walls. (E) Landscaping requirements for new and expanded developments. Adequate minimum landscaping shall be provided as follows: The area coverage of trees and shrubs to be planted, together with the existing crown area of those retained shall occupy at least thirty-five (35) percent of the total land area of the proposed project. Total land area for purposes of this paragraph shall be the area shown on the site plan as the area of the site plan under consideration. 2. The approved crown coverage allowances are listed below. They are based upon the anticipated size at maturity when located in a built environment. Type Minimum Height at Maturity Crown Coverage Allowance Large deciduous trees 50' min. height 1,250 square feet each (35') Large evergreen trees 30' min. height 500 square feet each (22') Small deciduous trees 15' min. height 250 square feet each (15') il Screening and Landscaping Standards Type Minimum Height at Maturity Crown Coverage Allowance Small evergreen trees 15' min. height 250 square feet each (15') Large shrubs 5' min. height 10 square feet each (3') Small shrubs 2' min. height 5 square feet each (2') Shrub planting which apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements shall not exceed more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total crown coverage allowance requirements. Shrub plantings proposed for use as screen plantings (such as related to refuse service areas, outdoor storage areas, mechanical equipment, etc.) do not apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements. 4. Groundcovers, perennial plantings, or turf grass do not apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements. Trees and shrubs used in bioretention areas and in other low impact design alternatives may be used to count towards crown coverage requirements. 6. Landscaping shall be provided around the base of any freestanding sign proposed. The size of the landscaped area shall not be less than one and one-half (1.5) times the square footage of the sign. 7. Landscaping shall be provided along the main entrance fagade of all buildings, providing a vegetative area between the building and parking areas. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of small trees, shrubs, and groundcover. (F) Additional screening requirements. All refuse service (dumpsters/containers) and outdoor storage areas in all zoning districts shall be screened from surrounding views per section 30-92-5 and as shown in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Height of screening must be a minimum of six (6) feet. 2. Ground level and roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened or landscaped per section 30-92-5 and as shown in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Commercial and industrial use types shall screen from surrounding views all articles and materials being stored, maintained, repaired, processed, erected, fabricated, dismantled, or salvaged. Articles and materials available for retail sale by a commercial use type shall be exempt from this requirement. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11) COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT Background Colonial Avenue provides a vital link in the regional highway network from the inner city of Roanoke to the outlying suburbs of Roanoke County. As development has increased over the years around the inner city area, the function of Colonial Avenue has stayed the same. This increase in development has had a direct impact on the roadway as traffic volumes rise steadily. High traffic volumes and the availability of developable land often cause developers to seek locations along such corridors for new commercial development. This situation has begun along the Colonial Avenue corridor. As commercial.pressures increase, the importance of protecting established neighborhoods and ensuring the safe and efficient flow of traffic becomes more crucial. It is also important to ensure a comfortable transition for existing residential frontage properties if neighboring parcels become commercial. Compatibility can be improved upon, if not achieved, through the proper use of building style, orientation and location, landscaping, signage, lighting, parking concepts and access management. Staff recommends the following site design guidelines - particularly on Colonial Avenue frontage properties - for development or redevelopmentin the corridor. Goal To plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along the corridor. Design Guidelines Objectives To encourage well designed, aesthetically pleasing developments that make a positive contribution to the streetscape and lessen potential negative impacts on adjacent residential properties. To encourage architectural compatibility with the surrounding residential character. To minimize impacts to traffic flow from new developments. To encourage the use of landscaping to improve environmental quality within new developments, enhance property values and create an enduring community image. To limit light pollution onto adjacent residential areas and encourage human scale in detail lighting. To minimize sign clutter by encouraging attractive, well-placed signage. I. Existing Conditions A. The proposed development should show sensitivity to the existing residential character of the corridor by incorporating as many of the following as possible: The preservation and use of existing residential structures for small offices (architecturally compatible alterations and additions are permitted), or the construction of new buildings having a distinct residential character. 2. The preservation and incorporation of existing vegetation. 3. Front yard character that is a common feature of residential properties should be preserved_ 4. Depending upon terrain, the use of terraced parking lots, minimizing their visual and site impacts, may be appropriate. 5. Existing drainage ways should be protected and incorporated into all proposals. II. Site Layout A. Buildings 1. A building should be prominent from street view, using its architecture as advertising. 2. Setbacks should be determined according to ultimate road right-of-way. 3. Minimum distance between a building, off-street parking, driveway, loading space or paved surfaces and any contiguous residential property should be 25 feet. B. Parking 1. Parking should be constructed to the rear and sides of buildings only. Street frontage should be devoted to building architecture and landscaping. 2. Parking areas should be designed to allow fixture interconnections with adjacent parcels. 3. Where feasible, break up required parking into smaller areas spaced throughout the site, lessening their visual and environmental impacts. 4. Alternative surface materials, such as pervious pavement, are recommended. Asphalt pavement should be minimized to mitigate existing drainage problems. C. Site Access 1. Where feasible, businesses should share access points from the street right-of-way. Temporary access points may be utilized until further development of the corridor allows for combined access. These temporary permits are issued with the understanding that they will be closed when a satisfactory alternate access in available in the opinion of the local governing body. 2. At the time of project approval property owners should provide a joint easement agreement allowing cross access to and from other properties in the surrounding area and a unified parking and circulation plan should be established wherever feasible. III. Architectural Treatment A. Scale 1. Size of buildings should approach a residential scale. Avoid excessive height and buildings out of scale with adjacent structures. 2. Where larger buildings are proposed, landscaping and architectural facades should be used to lessen their impact. 3. Where infilling between existing residential structures, maintain a continuity of building height, width, first floor elevation, architectural style and porch detailing, if applicable. B. Entrances 1. Design entrances that are clearly visible and easily recognizable from parking lots and walkways which serve the building. 2. The principal "front" facade should face Colonial Avenue, for all buildings directly adjacent to the road, although the major pedestrian entrance may be in the back or side of the structure. C. Materials 1. Materials should be selected for harmony with the surrounding community and for suitability to the type of building and style in which they are used. 2. Exterior materials such as exposed concrete block, metal or brightly colored siding are not recommended. Materials should be in the range of earth tones. D. Roofs Utilize dormers, gables and other variations in roof shapes and/or heights that are compatible with the basic facade elements and add interest and scale to the building. Avoid flat roofs. Gable roofs, hip roofs and multiple plain roofs are encouraged. IV. Landscaping A. Native Vegetation 1. Landscape plans should incorporate the use of native vegetation. B. Adjacent Right -of -Way Plantings 1. Front yards should be developed as open green spaces with a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms, and/or ground covers. 2. Where it is necessary that portions of a parking lot front the adjacent right-of-way, a planting strip of 10 feet in width should be provided along the adjacent right-of-way. Within this strip a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms or ground covers should be utilized to buffer the parking area. C. Parking Areas 1. Parking areas should incorporate raised landscaped islands in order to break up large expanses of pavement. 2. Large shade trees should be planted within and along the perimeter of parking areas in order to mitigate the negative environmental effects of heat and glare. 3. Landscaped berms located around parking areas to soften the noise, light and view of a parking area to its neighbors are highly encouraged. D. Building Plantings 1. Buildings should incorporate foundation plantings where appropriate. E. Stormwater Management 1. Above- ground stormwater management areas and facilities should be landscaped with plants adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water and designed as an asset to the overall development. F. Screening & Buffering 1. Where a development adjoins residential property, a 25 -foot wide buffer yard should be required. a. Within this buffer yard landscaping and screening should be provided and maintained to an average height of 15 feet. A combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms and/or ground covers should be utilized. Berming is encouraged to supplement screening. Average berm height should be 3-4 feet. Berm slopes should be no greater than 2:1. V. Lighting A. Details of lighting fixtures should be compatible with the existing residential character of the corridor. B. Path and landscape lighting are encouraged where appropriate. Lighting should be at a pedestrian scale through the use of light standards or placements 14 feet or less in height. . C. Parking lot lighting should be no more than 14' above grade, down -lit or shielded so as to direct light to the interior of the lot and not project glare onto the street or adjacent properties. Average intensity should not exceed the minimum required for safety. D. Any security lighting should be shielded and located so as to not cast light onto adjacent properties. In addition, the light source should not be visible from adjoining residential areas. VI. Signage A. The shared use of signs is encouraged for adjacent businesses. B. Signage should complement a buildings' architectural style. C. Signage placed on buildings should occupy less than 5% of the facade area. D. All freestanding signs should be monument type and meet the following criteria: 1. Monument signs should not exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width; 2. Signs should be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. E. Message length should be limited so that a passing motorist can read a sign within three -to -four seconds. No interchangeable boards should be permitted. F. Signs should be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. The size of the landscaping plot should be one and one-half times the square footage of the sign, G. No portable or temporary signs should be permitted. Neighborhood Conservation: A future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Land Use Types: Single -Family Residential - Attached and detached housing at a reasonable density that is not significantly higher than the existing neighborhood. Infill lots or community re -development should be designed to be sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood but can be at reasonably higher density. New single-family residential developments should incorporate greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Cluster developments are encouraged. Neighborhood Institutional Centers - Uses that serve the neighborhood residents including parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, recreational and park facilities, community meeting areas and clubs. These facilities should be linked to the residential areas by greenways, bike trails and pedestrian paths. Neighborhood Commercial - Low impact services to serve the local neighborhood that are consistent with the Community Plan design guidelines. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited density residential subdivisions have been platted and developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where limited density residential zoning has been established. EXPANSION AREAS - Locations where the expansion of the existing development pattern is logical. INFILL DEVELOPMENT - Locations where infill areas complement the surrounding development pattern. ACCESS - Locations served by a local street system. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. Transition: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Land Use Types: Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings are encouraged. A high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design is encouraged. Retail - Small-scale planned and clustered retail uses. Multifamily Residential - Garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. Single -Family Attached Residential - Planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre. Parks - Public and private recreational facilities. These facilities should be linked to residential areas by greenways, bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited commercial uses exist. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. SURROUNDING LAND USE - Locations which serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use patterns. ORIENTATION - Locations which are physically oriented toward the major street. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE TO REZONE 1.17+/- ACRES FROM R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO C-1 (LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4920 COLONIAL AVENUE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, upon the petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc., as agent to the property owner, to rezone approximately 1. 17 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial) with proffered conditions, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue to develop a two-story, 11,500 square foot office building for medical use; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 5, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the petition; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 12, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. The Board approves the rezoning requested by petition of Balzar and Associates, Inc. on behalf of the owner to rezone three parcels located at 4920 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map No. 086.08-02-22.00-0000, and Tax Map Nos. 086.08-02.22.01-0000 and 086.08-02-22.02-0000) from R-1 to C-1 for an 11,500 square foot office building for medical use. 2. The Board accepts the voluntary proffered conditions offered by the petitioner as: Page 1 of 2 a. Concept Plan Conformance. The proffer of substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building -Development Plan" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018, subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process; and b. Building Design. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "new Colonial Medical Office Building" prepared by Motter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018. 3. The Board further finds that the proffered conditions: a. Have a reasonable relation to the rezoning; b. Are in conformity with the comprehensive plan; c. Are clearly understood and enforceable; and d. Do not require or allow a design or standards that are less restrictive than are now covered under the County's current development regulations. 4. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice, and will not be a substantial detriment to the community. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of Rhonda S. Conner to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R-1 S, Low Density Residential, District with a special use permit to acquire a multiple dog permit on 4.68 acres, located at 6185 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances for a special use permit for a multiple dog permit in a residential district. BACKGROUND: A multiple dog permit is defined as the keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of four (4) or more dogs over four (4) months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. The applicant is seeking to have five (5) dogs on her property. A special use permit is required for a multiple dog permit on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, that is less than 5 acres in size. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. One citizen spoke on this item during the public hearing. His concerns included noise, limiting the special use permit to the applicant, and the breeding of dogs. The applicant is interested in breeding her Doberman Pinschers but not as a commercial business. Page 1 of 2 The Planning Commission discussed the breeding of dogs including placing a limit on the number of litters allowed per year, the differences between a multiple dog permit and a commercial kennel, and questioned whether or not the special use permit could be limited to the applicant. Staff clarified that the special use permit would run with the land and not the applicant. Staff also clarified that the special use permit was for the keeping of more than three (3) adult dogs and that placing a condition limiting the number of litters per year would be very difficult to enforce. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit with two conditions: 1. The maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five. 2. The breeding of dogs shall be limited to one litter per year. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no funding issue on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance approving a multiple dog permit with one condition: 1. The maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five. Page 2 of 2 Petitioner: Request: Location: Magisterial District: Conditions: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: STAFF REPORT Rhonda Conner Special Use Permit for Multiple Dog Permit on 4.68 acres in R -1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit 6185 Bent Mountain Road Windsor Hills 1. The maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five. Rhonda Conner is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Multiple Dog Permit on less than 5 acres in R-1 S, Low Density Residential District with a special use permit. The applicant currently has three dogs. The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designations on this parcel are Development and Suburban Village. Development is a future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Suburban Village is a future land use area that represents the focus of surrounding, generally lower intensity commercial, institutional and residential growth for a broad mixture of surrounding development. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a multiple dog permit as the keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of four (4) or more dogs over four (4) months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. Section 30-82-4 of the Zoning Ordinance contains use and design standards associated with a multiple dog permit. They are: (A) General standards: Minimum lot size: One (1) acre. 2. A multiple dog permit shall be permitted only when accessory to a single-family dwelling. 3. Exterior runs, pens and other confined areas designed to house four (4) or more animals shall be set back at least twenty-five (25) feet from any property line. For the purposes of this section, perimeter fencing of a yard shall not be considered a confined area. 4. A special use permit shall be required on lots less than five (5) acres in an R-1 or R-2 zoning district. Chapter 5 (Animals and Fowl) of the Roanoke County Code also has regulations on the keeping of dogs. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — Ms. Conner currently has three dogs and would like to acquire a fourth. Two of the dogs are young Doberman Pinschers that will weigh approximately 100-110 pounds when they are fully grown. The third dog is an 8 -year-old Akita that weighs approximately 45 pounds. The fourth dog is expected to weigh 40 to 60 pounds. She is asking for a limit of five dogs for potential future adoptions. Topography/Vegetation — A large portion of the property to the east of the house is wooded with steep topography. The western side of the property, including the portion where the house and accessory structures are located, is relatively flat and sits in the Special Flood Hazard Area, 100 -year flood plain. Surrounding Neighborhood — The property is located at the base of Bent Mountain in a rural setting. The subject parcel is bordered by single-family residences to the west, south, and east, and a vacant parcel to the north. Properties on the opposite side of Bent Mountain Road are zoned AR Agricultural/Residential and are currently undeveloped. There are two dwelling units on the property, set back approximately 200 feet from the public road and 100 feet from the nearest neighboring house. The second dwelling unit, an accessory apartment, was approved by a previous Special Use Permit in 2013. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — There is an existing fenced area approximately 12,000 square feet in size that adequately restrains the dogs as shown on the attached site plan. The property includes a single-family home of 3,240 square feet, and a free-standing garage with an accessory apartment. Agency Comments — The following agencies have no objections to the proposed permit: Roanoke County Economic Development, Fire and Rescue Department, Virginia Department of Transportation, Roanoke County Office of Building Safety, and Roanoke County Office of Solid Waste. Animal Control - There have been no documented incidents in reference to any type of animal calls. The police have to objection to approval of this request. Screening & Buffering — The property is wooded where it borders adjacent residential properties to the east and north. No buffering exists on the west and south sides of the property. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is partially Development and partially Suburban Village. Development is a future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Clustered developments are encouraged, as is the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Suburban Village is a future land use area that represents the focus of surrounding, generally lower intensity commercial, institutional and residential growth for a broad mixture of surrounding development. New neighborhood development occurs in close proximity to institutional, office and retail uses. Cluster developments and greenways are encouraged in conjunction with formerly rural land uses focusing on environmental and building and site design innovation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Rhonda Conner is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Multiple Dog Permit on less than 5 acres in R-1, Low Density Residential District to allow her to house five dogs. Ms. Conner owns two young Doberman Pinschers and one 8 -year old Akita; she wishes to acquire a fourth dog as a companion for her Akita. In the future she may want a fifth dog. 2 With the property just under the 5 -acre limit at 4.68 acres, the proposed Multiple Dog Permit is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the R-1 Low Density Residential zoning district, and there appears to be no negative impact associated with this request. Should the property be rezoned for future development this permit may become less compatible with the intentions of future land use designations. However, because the use is not permanent and does not include any structural changes, it is unlikely to be a factor in any potential future rezoning and redevelopment scenario. CASE NUMBER: 442019 PREPARED BY: Cecile Newcomb HEARING DATES: PC: 215119 BOS: 2126119 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Aerial Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Photographs R-1 Zoning District Regulations Selected Sections of Chapter 5 (Animals and Fowl) of the County Code County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl ��� t --�7 Date received . Received by: �7 Application fee:/ .50 PUMA date: Placards issued: BOS date: ,0� Case Number R ALL APPLICANTS Check type of ap lication filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning Opeeial Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicantsw/zip Phone: -- $ name/address R,v L[ 4 - A tl� ��77�,,( Work: 4 VC,! q�. Cell !: —343 cl ©t Fax No.: Owne ' nam addre s w/zi /' Phone #: S � Work: t4 _ Q,�,,�( Qtt,�l " Fax No. #: IrlXL40(12) Property Locatio /„ r( %�,,., od _t 1, (?O �tJ Magisterial District: 1 Community Planning area: a�`i{ l'1t l e) (1 � U& T No.• Vim. 0 Existing Zoning: — Size of parcel(s): Acres: 4. Existing Land Use: —� REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RIS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: U— Proposed Land Use: Does V parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes Pf No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes.Pf No F1 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RfSIWlCP WAA Consultation RISIW/CP V1AA 8 112" x I I" concept plan RJSIWICP VIAA Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property I hereby certify that I am either the owner of t property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with consent f the owner. fftl +bt < C" Owner's Wt NOV 2 7 2018 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP. PLAN p5.2.2232j REVIEW REQUESTS .. Applicant . I1 -S", L of" -J— - - - - The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicab a zoning district classification in the Zoning O dinanc �-ur-& 5-'e- rtes dy qkv--1) a S -e- OVI t' se� btuOct cin x.17 Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. t ��� �. � ef-e, tt? tt �t 1�.2_-kci� �r� o � 9 Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impact-, on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and ire and rescue. r6pp 6, 1*t ��p 4e Sue�rou �C e�nC C'r wa `� � o + ®� >O �. �_ \t-A� (pi Pkj '-_ 4 ~W¢ w a w w azo W z U)N W ®oma If 0 � ku J F-- Z d N N C6 q' 6 Cd (pi Pkj '-_ 90) a Lwn dL o Qr v- CL o � Ld IL h to .mss WW y f p Ce two (36 `\ 0 4t tri zg -i.5,1a 01 Ci 0 b--�4 90) a Lwn dL o Qr v- CL o � Ld IL CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not he manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS ,J a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow "1 c. Lot size iacres r square feet and dimensions d. Location, riaes of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights _A. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1, Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers in. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals in. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. �AL& 45, Ce�jt I I, aL9. i Signature of applicant Date A/Y0 F Community Development z Planning & Zoning Division z ,e a NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandumm by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of'potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 N me of Petitia AQ Petitioner's Signature a.0. ts Date z . . ,o $ \ 6 / 2 © / \ f ^ . . . > \ - _ . \ . . 0 1-7 ❑ _ \ \\ / \ = e o>! a a k(` > s / \ § J °° 0 > . / ~ (1)� \2 QL ® $ & / "� R » c o R ) 0 c \ \6g \ §S .. / { g g =/ ) \ \ E j j \ / / 6 3 3 \ { \ 2 \ '/ / 2 3 s/ c z % $ G G G§} 3\ / \� 2 \ \ \ \ 00 } / / / ƒ 3 ( / \ $ \ LIJ \ \ / \ / \ B ' \ 2 | | o/ e 2 D « D x\ / / ± 4 c._ 2 J / © < z e z% z o 0\ I 1 � � $ » p $ � k P � m 17 q \ E .. W / � -Q \ / \ sE\ (/ z / �3 n z0 0 m \y � / \ (D � R B \ yzy \/\ /»6/ \ /\ o � (D W 2! 2 \ \ 3 9 0 / / c\\ \ e z /\\ \ \ \// � m 17 q N /� Ap 0 z /El \ / \ \ (D / -Q \ / \ sE\ (/ z / �3 % m z0 m \y > \ \ \ \ \ b ± ® = = o e 2 g B ° 'E 3 \/\ \\ \ /\ N /� Ap 0 z /El % m c \\m§ i/ \ \ }� dIaJj01k \ > .2 / g U\ \ / m / \ \ / 3 [ (D5 E c z z k 2 / ( 3 � \ / i / LO y U y\ 7= \ / 3 3 / ƒ / u \ \\ 0� \\ IN* IN R-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose. (A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low -middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § I£, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * R -I District Regulations Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * 2. Civic Uses Cemetery * 2 R -I District Regulations Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Golf Course * 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-41-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. K R -I District Regulations b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) El Chapter 5 — Animals and Fowl ARTICLE II. - DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 5-24. - Limitation on number kept per dwelling unit. (a) The harboring or keeping of more than three (3) dogs over four (4) months of age per dwelling shall be unlawful, unless a multiple dog permit has been issued pursuant to this article. The harboring or keeping of more than six (6) cats over four (4) months of age, of which no more than two (2) may be fertile, per dwelling shall be unlawful. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any dwelling which is part of an active agricultural operation or usage as defined by the zoning ordinance for the county. (b) As of July 26, 2005, allow a sixty-day period to register four (4) dogs if the dogs are owned currently and upon the death of one (1) of the four (4) dogs, the homeowner would be allowed to maintain three (3) dogs from that point forward. (c) Any person participating in a dog foster adoption program sanctioned by the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection may be permitted to keep no more than four (4) dogs over four (4) months of age per dwelling for a period of ninety (90) days, unless an extension is granted by the foster adoption program, so long as the person is in compliance with all of the regulations in the foster adoption program. (Ord. No. 3137, § 2, 5-11-82; Ord. No. 52290-7, § 1, 5-22-90; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 101497-7, § 1, 10-14-97; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 2, 7-26-05; Ord No. 111015-7, § 1, 11- 10-15) Sec. 5-25. - Sanitary condition of premises where kept. The structure or building in which any dogs are confined and the lot, compound or enclosure in which they are penned shall be kept in such sanitary condition as not to cause offensive odors or attract flies or other insects. (Code 1971, § 5-9) Sec. 5-26. - Nuisance prohibited. It shall be unlawful for the owner or harborer of any dog, cat or other wild or domestic animal to cause or permit such animal to perform, create or engage in any animal nuisance defined in section 5-21. Any animal found acting in any way forbidden by this article shall hereby be declared a nuisance and its owner or harborer shall be subject to the penalties provided by section 5-34. (Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94) Sec. 5-27. - Barking or howling dogs. The harboring or keeping of any dog which, by loud, frequent or habitual barking or howling or by any other conduct, shall cause annoyance and disturb the peace and quiet of any person or neighborhood shall be unlawful; and any such dog is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. Any such dog may, after reasonable notice has been given by the community service officer or other law enforcement officer to the owner of such dog, if known, or upon the complaint of any person, if such owner is unknown, be impounded and confined in the county animal shelter by the community service officer. The disposition of any such dog shall be in accordance with section 5-29. (Code 1971, § 5-10.2; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN AN R -1S (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR A MULTIPLE USE DOG PERMIT ON 4.68 ACRES, LOCATED AT 6185 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the owner, Rhonda Conner, has requested a Special Use Permit for a multiple dog permit on less than 5 acres in an R -1S (Low Density Residential) District in order to acquire a fourth dog; and WHEREAS, Section 30-82-4 contains Use and Design Standards associated with a multiple dog permit, while the Zoning Ordinance defines multiple dogs as four or more with other restrictions; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 5, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use permit with two conditions: that the maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five and that the breeding of dogs shall be limited to one litter per year; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 12, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. The Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow multiple dogs by the owner of 6185 Bent Mountain Road (Tax Map. No. 096.01-03-36.00- 0000) in the Windsor Hills District is in conformance with the goals and Page 1 of 2 objectives of the R-1 Low Density Residential zoning district, and there appears to be no negative impact associated with this request. 2. The Board grants this special use permit subject to the following conditions: a. The maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five dogs. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County et al to amend the master plan for the Center for Research and Technology and to remove the proffered condition on properties totaling approximately 480.21 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, located on Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle, Catawba Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances to amend the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) master plan and remove a proffered condition on industrial properties. BACKGROUND: This application seeks to remove a proffered condition from the properties at CRT and amend the master plan by adding standards to the conceptual rendering while maintaining the overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. There were no citizens to speak on this item during the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed permitted uses and the development standards added to the master plan, future land use, buffers, and easing development regulations to attract new businesses. The Planning Commission recommends approval to amend the master Page 1 of 2 plan for the Center for Research and Technology and to remove a proffered condition from the properties. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance amending the master plan for the Center for Research and Technology and removing the proffered condition on several properties. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Economic Development Authority et al Request: To amend the master plan for the Center for Research and Technology and to remove the proffered condition on properties totaling approximately 480.21 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District Location: Center for Research and Technology Magisterial District: Catawba Proffered Condition: The Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, Roanoke County Center (To Be Removed) for Research & Technology, dated 3-9-07. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Economic Development Authority et al is requesting to remove the proffered condition from the properties (totaling approximately 480.21 acres) at the Center for Research & Technology (CRT) and to amend the master plan for CRT. The only proffered condition on these properties incorporates the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants to the zoning of the properties. Removal of the proffered condition would separate the zoning of the property (controlled by the Master Plan and PTD zoning requirements) from the private covenants (controlled by the property owners in CRT). The amendments to the CRT Master Plan would add development standards (permitted uses, height, lighting, minimum front setbacks, lot coverage, subdivision, and signage) to the conceptual rendering of the Master Plan. The overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers remains the same. The future land use designation in the County's Comprehensive Plan for the Center for Research & Technology is Principal Industrial. These areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. This request is consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation, is consistent with the goals, objectives and implementation strategies listed in the Economic Development Plan component of the Comprehensive Plan, and is consistent with the vision statement and several goals of the Glenvar Community Plan (2012). 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-63 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the district regulations for properties zoned PTD (Planned Technology Development). Section 30-63 also outlines the application process to rezone properties to PTD, the information required for the application, and the process for revising a final master plan once adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The revised CRT Master Plan along with the PTD zoning regulations would guide any future development at CRT. Development of individual industrial sites would also follow the County's subdivision, site plan review, and building plan review processes. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — In 1999, the County rezoned approximately 457 acres of property along Glenmary Drive from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to PTD (Planned Technology District) to establish the Center for Research and Technology (CRT). As part of the rezoning process a Master Plan and design guidelines/protective covenants were developed and became proffers associated with the development. After the property was rezoned, the County began constructing the infrastructure (roads and utilities) to attract new businesses. Two businesses (Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton Products, LLC) have located in CRT. In 2007, the County rezoned an additional 25 -acre parcel from R-1 to PTD that was incorporated into CRT. In addition, the County amended the covenants, conditions and Master Plan for CRT. No additional businesses have located in CRT. Topography/Vegetation — CRT includes a wide range of slope and topography. The southern portion of the site is the most level. The northern portion of the site becomes quite steep, with slopes exceeding 25% for the majority of this portion of the property. The majority of the site contains woodlands consisting of oak, hickory, beech, ash, tulip poplar, maple and scattered evergreen trees. Surrounding Neighborhood — The site is bordered on the west by the Prunty and Dow Hollow communities and on the east by the Glenvar Heights neighborhood. These established single-family residential areas are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential. Interstate 81 borders the property to the south. Across 1-81, properties are zoned R-1 and C-2, High Intensity Commercial. Properties to the north are zoned AG -3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This application seeks to do the following: Remove the proffered condition from the properties located at the Center for Research and Technology; and Amend the Master Plan for CRT. While not part of this application, amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants for CRT are also proposed. Removal of Proffered Condition The only proffered condition on these properties incorporates the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants to the zoning of the properties. This complicates development at CRT by requiring a rezoning action to make amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. Removal of the proffered condition would separate the zoning of the property (controlled by the Master Plan and PTD zoning requirements) from the private covenants (controlled by the property owners in CRT). Master Plan Amendments The amendments would add development standards to the conceptual rendering of the Master Plan. These standards include permitted uses, height, lighting, minimum front setbacks, lot coverage, subdivision, and signage. Many of these standards were taken from the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, and the PTD regulations in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the height, lot coverage, and minimum front setback standards come from the County's PTD regulations; the lighting standard comes from the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants and the County's Zoning Ordinance; the sign standards come from the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, but the total number of signs has been increased from two (2) to three (3), the number of fagade signs allowed has been increased from one (1) to two (2), and the total square footage for fagade signs has been increased from 150 square feet to 300 square feet, while the monument sign standard remains unchanged; and the permitted uses come from the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, which have been amended to clarify the uses in the Zoning Ordinance, and two uses have been added — major utility services and incidental retail sales and 2 commercial activity totaling 20% or less of the gross floor area. Incidental retail sales and commercial activity up to 10% is allowed as an accessory use for industrial use types in the Zoning Ordinance. Development Guidelines/Protective Covenants Amendments While not part of this application, amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants for CRT are also proposed. These amendments would remove definitions, remove the permitted uses (which are now listed on the revised Master Plan), eliminate the Design Review Team (please note that the County Administrator dissolved the Design Review Team in Nov. 2018), amend the project review process and procedures as well as enforcement, and amend development and design standards dealing with: building siting and location; parking, loading areas, and docks; lighting; accessory structures such as fences and outbuildings; signs; and transportation elements. Some of these standards have been placed on the revised master plan. Any amended covenants would need to be agreed upon and signed by the property owners within CRT and recorded. Once recorded, enforcement of the amended covenants would then be by the property owners within CRT. Copies of the draft amended Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants were included in the application for informational purposes and may change. Agency Comments: Economic Development: The Economic Development Department supports the Economic Development Authority's rezoning request for the Center for Research and Technology. By removing the design guidelines and protective covenants as a zoning condition, this will allow the Department to more effectively and competitively market the CRT for new business growth. Including the design standards as a component of the Center's Master Plan ensures that high quality development is maintained, appropriate uses are permitted and tenants and neighbors are protected. This is consistent with the recently completed Wood Haven Technology Park rezoning and Master Plan process. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The properties in CRT are designated Principal Industrial on the future land use map in the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. This request is consistent with the future land use designation. This proposal also meets several goals listed in the Economic Development Plan section of the County's Comprehensive Plan (2005). These include: • To market the County's industrial/commercial property and attract compatible business and industry to the community, and to increase the commercial and industrial tax base and related employment opportunities. • To encourage the retention and growth of local enterprise by creating and maintaining a positive business climate countywide. • To create and maintain a marketable inventory of quality industrial/commercial real property sufficient to meet market demand. This proposal is also consistent with the vision statement and several goals of the Glenvar Community Plan (2012). These include: • Vision Statement — The Glenvar area strives to be a visually appealing, healthy and sustainable community that encourages a mix of land uses in a manner that is consistent with the community's rural character. • Goal - Ensure that public services and facilities will adequately serve the needs of residents and businesses within the Glenvar community and that such services and facilities are adaptable to future growth. • Goal - Provide a mix of environmentally -sensitive commercial and industrial uses at appropriate locations in the Glenvar community that meet the needs of current and future residents. • Goal - Conserve and appropriately use the Glenvar community's natural resources in a manner that ensures their long-term viability and recreational, natural, scenic and economic value. • Goal - Maintain a healthy, safe and sustainable community that ensures opportunities for a multi- generational community to live, work, recreate and raise a family. • Goal - Develop a comprehensive system of public and private parks, trails and open spaces that meet the needs of all age groups within the Glenvar community [and Roanoke County]. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The Economic Development Authority et al is requesting to remove the proffered condition from the properties at the Center for Research & Technology (CRT) and to amend the master plan for CRT. The only proffered condition on these properties incorporates the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants to the zoning of the properties. Removal of the proffered condition would separate the zoning of the property (controlled by the Master Plan and PTD zoning requirements) from the private covenants (controlled by the property owners in CRT). The amendments to the CRT Master Plan would add development standards (permitted uses, height, lighting, minimum front setbacks, lot coverage, subdivision, and signage) to the conceptual rendering of the Master Plan. The overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers remains the same. The future land use designation for CRT is Principal Industrial. This request is consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation, is consistent with the goals, objectives and implementation strategies listed in the Economic Development Plan component of the Comprehensive Plan, and is consistent with the vision statement and several goals of the Glenvar Community Plan (2012). CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: 3-112019 Philip Thompson PC: 215119 BOS: 2126119 Application Aerial Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map PTD District Regulations Principal Industrial Future Land Use Description Ordinance 052207-12 M County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P D Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/13ZA date: Placards issued: &]S date: Cruse Number ALLAPPLICANTS Is Check type of application filed (check all that apply) N Rezoning U Special Use Q Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15,2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip Phone: Work: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Cell #: Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Fax No, A Property Location Magisterial District: Catawba Center for Research and Technology Proffers, ii Glenmary Dr, Salem Va, 24153 Community Planningarea: Glenvar Tax Map No.: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Existing Zoning: PTD, PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT Size of parcel(s): Acres: 10M 00 • Z Existing Land Use: Technology Park REZONING, SPECIAL USE, PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (xs,2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANT`(RISIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: PTD, Planned Technology District, and to amend the covenants, canditlonR, and master plan on 454.25 ac r zoned PTD Proposed Land Use: Technology Park Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes Lf No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes [Y No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes CJ No El VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINIST'RAITTVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (YIWIAA) VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF • —r.• x 1— I ITEMS T'1TG OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/WICP Vhi A Consultation 8 1/2" x I P concept plan Applicatio Application Metes and bounds description�F—* Proffers, ii Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining I hereby certify that I am either the owner or the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am actin consent f the owner. Owl * See attached signature sheet 4 -82018 ATTACHMENT TO REZONING APPLICATION FILED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS INC. AND TECTON PRODUCTS LLC Applicants' names /addresses w/zip Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2069 Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. 5400 Corporate Circle Salem, VA 24153 540-389-9361 Tecton Products LLC 5415 Corporate Circle Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-5819 Appalachian Power Company 1 Riverside Plaza — 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 -2373 (614)716-6835 Owners' names/addresses whip Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 054.00-01-02.00-0000 430.27 acres 064.01-05-02.00-0000 13.00 acres Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. 5400 Corporate Circle Salem, VA 24153 064.01-05-01.00-0000 16.94 acres Tecton Products LLC 5415 Corporate Circle Salem, VA 24153 054.00-01-02.01-0000 20.00 acres Appalachian Power Company 1 Riverside Plaza — 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 -2373 (614)716-6835 CRT Lot 5 52.956 acres Note: Tax Map # has not been created for CRT Lot 5. The 52.956 -acre lot is being created out of TM# 054.00-01-02.00-0000 and is included in the 430.27 acres for that parcel. PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT SIGNATURE FORM (1) ROANOKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Signature iSI-Ef co k . frWSSE0013-6 Printed Name C� Title (2) TECTON PRODUCTS, LLC Signature lov Printed Name p144cl t7 c Title (3) NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS, INC. atur Lk C-'�Jr) Jo �e- r 0 e Printed Name —} o c-o`e,4' any Title PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT SIGNATURE FORM (4) APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY Signa — ture Printed Name P. Todd Ireland Title ,nor Real state Asset Msnapwnnant Anusrlcan .Vk ctrlc Power ServIe orporatir n Autkoft6d' Signer XSTIFICATION FOR RY,7ONJNG, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15 ,2-2232) REVIEW REQIJESTS _ Applicant Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County et al The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15,2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS ........ . Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkstrecreation and fire and rescue. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Proiect Description This application seeks to do the following: • Remove the proffered condition from the properties located at the Center for Research and Technology. The only proffered condition on these properties incorporates the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants to the zoning of the properties. This complicates development at CRT by requiring a rezoning action to make amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. Removal of the proffered condition would separate the zoning of the property (controlled by the Master Plan and PTD zoning requirements) from the private covenants (controlled by the property owners in CRT). • Amend the Master Plan for CRT. The amendments would add development standards to the conceptual rendering of the Master Plan. These standards include permitted uses, height, lighting, minimum front setbacks, lot coverage, subdivision, and signage. Many of these standards were taken from the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants and the PTD regulations in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers remains the same. While not part of this application, amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants for CRT are also proposed. These amendments would remove definitions, remove the permitted uses (which are now listed on the revised Master Plan), eliminate the Design Review Team, amend the project review process and procedures as well as enforcement, and amend development and design standards dealing with: building siting and location; parking, loading areas, and docks; lighting; accessory structures such as fences and outbuildings; signs; and transportation elements. Some of these standards have been placed on the revised master plan. Any amended covenants would need to be signed by the property owners within CRT and recorded. Once recorded, enforcement of the amended covenants would then be by the property owners within CRT. Copies of the draft amended Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants are included for informational purposes. Proiect Justification Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The development of the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Development of this industrial park would encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarges the tax base. Two companies, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton Products, LLC, have located in CRT providing employment and enlarging the tax base. Additional sites are available for new industries to locate there. By having an overall Master Plan with development standards as well as private development guidelines and protective covenants, CRT will contribute to the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community. The property is zoned Planned Technology Development (PTD) District. The purpose statement for the PTD District is as follows: The planned technology development (PTD) district is established primarily for Type I and Type 11 manufacturing and industrial uses. Supporting accessory uses and facilities, such as office, commercial establishments, and residential areas are also permitted. The PTD district is intended to be designed with a park -like setting that complements surrounding land uses by means of appropriate siting of buildings, controlled access points, attractive and harmonious architecture, effective landscape buffering and scenic view easements. The district is intended to provide flexibility in design and site layout, allow latitude in combining different use types within a single development, and provide the developer with incentives to create an aesthetically pleasing and functional planned development. In addition, the intent of the planned technology development (PTD) district is to provide certain industries that are clean and environmentally efficient the opportunity to locate in an area of like technologies in what is generally known as a mixed use park, developed under a complete, comprehensive master plan. Standards are provided for landscaping, buffering and open space to encourage high technology industries and to ensure a park -like atmosphere. Important in determining the location and size of a PTD are the accessibility of the location, the availability of public utilities, public safety services and the suitability of the topography for site and building development purposes. CRT was established under the parameters of the PTD purpose statement. These revisions continue to meet and support the purpose statement of the PTD district. 2 Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The future land use designation for the properties at CRT is Principal Industrial. Principal industrial is a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Appropriate land use types in the Principal Industrial future land use designation include small industries and custom manufacturing, freestanding industrial uses, and industrial parks developed and designed according to a unified plan. CRT is a planned technology park that includes a variety of industrial uses that has been designed and will be developed under a unified plan. This proposal also meets several goals listed in the Economic Development Plan section of the County's Comprehensive Plan (2005). These include: • To market the County's industrial/commercial property and attract compatible business and industry to the community, and to increase the commercial and industrial tax base and related employment opportunities. • To encourage the retention and growth of local enterprise by creating and maintaining a positive business climate countywide. • To create and maintain a marketable inventory of quality industrial/commercial real property sufficient to meet market demand. The development of CRT is included in the Economic Development Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is also consistent with the vision statement and several goals of the Glenvar Community Plan (2012). These include: • Vision Statement —The Glenvar area strives to be a visually appealing, healthy and sustainable community that encourages a mix of land uses in a manner that is consistent with the community's rural character. • Goal - Ensure that public services and facilities will adequately serve the needs of residents and businesses within the Glenvar community and that such services and facilities are adaptable to future growth. • Goal - Provide a mix of environmentally -sensitive commercial and industrial uses at appropriate locations in the Glenvar community that meet the needs of current and future residents. • Goal - Conserve and appropriately use the Glenvar community's natural resources in a manner that ensures their long-term viability and recreational, natural, scenic and economic value. • Goal - Maintain a healthy, safe and sustainable community that ensures opportunities for a multi -generational community to live, work, recreate and raise a family. 3 • Goal - Develop a comprehensive system of public and private parks, trails and open spaces that meet the needs of all age groups within the Glenvar community [and Roanoke County]. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on the public service and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Since this application seeks to remove a proffered condition from the properties at CRT and amend the Master Plan by adding standards to the conceptual rendering while maintaining the overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers, there will be no additional impacts to the property, adjoining properties, and the surrounding areas as well as on public services and facilities associated with this request. 4 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request, The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS x a. Applicant name and name of development x b. Date, scale and north arrow x e. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions x d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties x e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses; floodplain, etc. x £ The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X. g. All property lines and easements x h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights x i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacentto the development x j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS x k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site x 1. Any driveways, ent•anceslexits, curb openings and crossovers x m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals x u. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections x o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants X. p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all iters required in the checklist above are complete. �rY1u. ko t tlaocy Signature of appli ant bate LL S S F W CD In CQ 1% W W U J U Q Q C Z�� F Z U Q C7 � z Z a y2j \ K 0 0 2¢ 0 LL W Z Z O Q a LL F Q Ir a� 0J�3 Q 0vw, -W / n- J V W D U Z Z O W W j V) V) V) Z F U WU c J 7� J Ila S C S} I • •' } Q V Q U QJ J W Z F 3 >> Jo F U Q Z 0 0 0 U %< y W U D LL 1' O F W W Q ♦f r•{�,lL '+, I•�. ~O = a Z W W U Q X S W j z? O F Q O i In a Q Z Q W 4 r r � l r � ., Ci Q coCP F �� N CL E 00 ti `•� • � L• \\ y I I J F Q J K W W F Q Z In 0 W D O Q W- } 2 W 0- 1' W C d' 0 Q V) 2 S F V) a. D LL K F v~i J Ca W :� V) Q D 0 W O j S F w W J Q W D yf } F la Z K Z N U� V X Q C F V) Q W U• F O C= Q W V) U_ W_ V� Z W LL LL V) V� O Z r Q 2 W F Q F (7 K U O W 2 Q Q S 1' 7 W S W m Z W O S m W Z W U O C7 IU W S Z V J W S W S W O Uo�2xvzo ��� zcQ� �F- c�V) Zw��O JjmF QZ =>w 0�0o0��a���Z V) S CL m 2 0 0^ N OJ Q 2 O¢ Z O O Y U Z C� Z W U Q a Q C W U 7 J a a w W W W LL :� = V) C7 LL ][ J F W J F Q C F S 7 J Z Z O D W LL S Q W C (7 W W W Z S K 7 W m v Q a m U U W Q V) D F U 2= 7 Z LL 0� K a F ca Z Q K O a Z LL CZ_ Z 0 F V, F F W O W V W O W C Q a W~ Q :V Q o m 1' V) Z W F F Z Q 2 0 0 0 of W O Q N C 0 0 Z Z U X yie �2Zj W O� K D a K 0 F- V, C LL O O W V) N W W II% a V) W sf 0 F R J 1 C7 LL V) n 0 ,n a W S- J I� a Q= a = L W Z F F ,n = > w 0M CRT Master Plan Standards ,TANnARnS- HEIGHT: WHEN ADJOINING PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED RESIDENTIAL, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE FORTY-FIVE (45) FEET, INCLUDING ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT MAY BE INCREASED, PROVIDED EACH REQUIRED YARD ADJOINING A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IS INCREASED TWO (2) FEET FOR EACH FOOT IN HEIGHT OVER FORTY-FIVE (45) FEET. THIS DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE WHICH EXCEEDS FORTY-FIVE (45) FEET. IN ALL OTHER LOCATIONS, THE HEIGHT IS UNLIMITED, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING IN THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWNWARD TO CONTROL EXTRANEOUS LIGHT OR GLARE. WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO BUFFERS, DARK/NIGHT SKY FRIENDLY LIGHTING USING FULL CUTOFF LIGHTING FIXTURES IS ENCOURAGED SO THAT THERE IS NO DIRECT LIGHT UPWARD AND NO GLARE. THE INTENSITY AT ADJOINING STREET OR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES. LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES FOR PARKING LOTS, LOADING/UNLOADING AREAS AND ACCESS WAYS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 25 FEET IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND KEPT TO MINIMUM NECESSARY FOR DIRECTION AND SAFETY DURING OPERATING HOURS. WALKWAYS AND BUILDING ENTRIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO HAVE GROUND LEVEL LIGHTING OR PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING NOT EXCEEDING 15 FEET IN HEIGHT. MINIMUM FRONT SETBACKS: ALL STRUCTURES PROPOSED TO FRONT ON EXISTING PUBLIC STREETS EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF THIRTY (30) FEET FROM THE EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE SHALL NOT EXCEED SEVENTY-FIVE (75%) PERCENT. SUBDIVISION: SHOULD THE PARCELS WHICH COMPRISE THE PROPERTY BE COMBINED OR SUBDIVIDED, THE STANDARDS SHALL BIND EACH SUBDIVIDED OR RECOMBINED PARCELS, AS APPLICABLE. SIGNAGE: NO MORE THAN THREE (3) PRIMARY SIGNS PER BUSINESS MAY BE ERECTED ON A PROPERTY. TWO SIGNS MAY BE ATTACHED TO THE FACE OF THE PRIMARY BUILDING AND ONE MAY BE ERECTED AS A GROUND MONUMENT SIGN. IF PLACED ON THE BUILDING, THE SIGNS SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE OR TEN PERCENT OF THE FRONT FACADE, WHICHEVER IS LESS. IF ERECTED AS A GROUND MONUMENT STRUCTURE, THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 60 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE AND SHALL NOT EXCEED TWELVE (12) FEET IN HEIGHT. GROUND MONUMENT SIGNS MAY HAVE TWO FACES. GROUND MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. CRT Master Plan Standards PERMITTED USES: PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CENTER SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES. LAND USES NOT LISTED ARE PROHIBITED. A. CORPORATE OFFICES AND GENERAL OFFICE USE. B. SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY BUSINESSES, SERVICES, OR LABORATORIES WHERE PROCESSES ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY CLEAN AND EFFICIENT. C. GENERAL MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY ESTABLISHMENTS (INDUSTRY, TYPE I USES) WHERE PROCESSES, FABRICATION AND PRODUCTS ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY CLEAN AND EFFICIENT. D. HOTEL WHICH MAY INCLUDE CONFERENCE FACILITIES. E. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES, COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY. F. MAJOR UTILITY SERVICES INCLUDING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS. G. MINOR UTILITY SERVICES INCLUDING UTILITY MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FACILITES. H. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CENTER MASTER PLAN. I. INCIDENTAL RETAIL SALE OF GOODS OR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMITTED USE, PROVIDED THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DOES NOT EXCEED TWENTY (20) PERCENT OF THE GROSS FLOOR AREA. J. ACCESSORY USES ASSOCIATED WITH A PRIMARY PERMITTED USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY ESTABLISHED COUNTY STANDARDS. Community Development 0 Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Nome this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas statlon/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (Including: financial Institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facll[tles • Educational/Recreational facilltles • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-spec[f[c use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study Is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access Issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, Improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Slx-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there Is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively Impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips In an average day Ef active date: April f9, 2005 OI Rd N04b Community Development Planning & Zoning Division x A NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning; Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written cominents and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County PIanning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note; a list of potential land arses and situations that would necessitate firr thet, study is provided as part of this application package), This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective dates April ?9, 2DDS EDA of Roanoke County et a] Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature { r` ao t`a Date / i J lu— .1 1 Z 6s� dl 1 ox l G � o N tO ommo o �Li�Z / J ,.yp•66C � Q N M Im q 4 O O W Center for Research & Technology Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Property Owner/Address 054.03-01-80.00-0000 Francis P. & Esther B. Cirasunda 5066 Dan Robin Road Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-79.00-0000 Francis P. & Esther B. Cirasunda 5066 Dan Robin Road Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-78.00-0000 Francis P. & Esther B. Cirasunda 5066 Dan Robin Road Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-77.00-0000 Stephen M. & Karen T. Davis 5090 Dan Robin Road Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-74.00-0000 Guy & Pam Beaudry 5010 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-73.00-0000 Guy & Pam Beaudry 5010 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-72.00-0000 James R. & Robin L. Burke 5030 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-71.00-0000 Gregory C. & Beverly R. Moulse 5040 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-70.00-0000 Curtis R. Long 5080 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-69.00-0000 Charles M. Miles & Barbara F. Miles Life Estate 5102 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-68.00-0000 Ronald R. & Robin R. Poff 5110 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-67.00-0000 Delong Living Trust Robert J. Delong Co -Trustee 26629 S. Lakemont Drive Chandler, AZ 85248 054.03-01-66.00-0000 Delong Living Trust Robert J. Delong Co -Trustee 26629 S. Lakemont Drive Chandler, AZ 85248 054.03-01-65.00-0000 Barnett R. & Bonnie B. Beamer 5132 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-64.00-0000 Chess M. & Carly M. Lee 5140 Glenvar Heights Blvd Center for Research & Technology Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Property Owner/Address Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-63.00-0000 Chess M. & Carly M. Lee 5140 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-62.00-0000 Timothy W. Sr. & Cindy L. Smith 5164 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-61.00-0000 Timothy W. Sr. & Cindy L. Smith 5164 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-60.00-0000 Earlene W. Bubnell REV TR AGR Earlene W. Bubnell TRS 5176 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-59.00-0000 Leslie E. Jr. & Janice K. Siler 5180 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-58.00-0000 Anya M. Kimble 5192 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-57.00-0000 Kevin D. Hill 5192 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-56.00-0000 Frances P. & Michael L. Campbell 5286 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-55.00-0000 Robert J. Jr. & Karen E. Powers 5228 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-54.00-0000 Robert J. Jr. & Karen E. Powers 5228 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-53.00-0000 Travis S. Graybill 5232 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-52.00-0000 James E. Duncan 5248 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-51.00-0000 Joshua M. & Heather R. Teubert 5254 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-50.00-0000 Charles L. & Linda D. Landis 5268 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-49.00-0000 Keith M. Chumbley 5278 Glenvar Heights Blvd Center for Research & Technology Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Property Owner/Address Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-48.00-0000 Oakley D. & Florence A. Sheppard 5286 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-47.00-0000 Stover W. & Rebecca Y. Carter 5298 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-46.00-0000 Donald R. & Carolyn C. Underwood 5300 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-45.00-0000 Donald R. & Carolyn C. Underwood 5300 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-44.00-0000 Anthony R. & Delinora Huffman 5328 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-43.00-0000 Anthony R. & Delinora Huffman 5328 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-42.00-0000 Robert E. & Faye C. Williams 5342 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-41.00-0000 Robert E. & Faye C. Williams 5342 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-40.00-0000 Phillip L. & Marion G. Roark 5358 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-39.00-0000 Phillip L. & Marion G. Roark 5358 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.03-01-38.00-0000 Shirley W. Noell 5368 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 054.00-01-04.00-0000 David W. & Constance R. Shelor 5502 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 043.00-01-45.00-0000 Fort Lewis Mountain Company LLC 5502 Glenvar Heights Blvd Salem, VA 24153 063.00-01-04.00-0000 Donald G. & Reva R. McNeil 5820 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 063.00-01-02.00-0000 Wesley E. Blankenship 5836 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 Center for Research & Technology Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Property Owner/Address 063.00-01-04.01-0000 Donald G. & Reva R. McNeil 5820 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 063.02-01-01.03-0000 Donald G. & Reva R. McNeil 5820 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 063.02-01-01.02-0000 Shawnte R. Wiley 5816 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 063.02-01-01.04-0000 Minnie Saunders 5816 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 063.02-01-01.01-0000 Sharon S. Gravely 5808 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.01-04-07.00-0000 Donald G. & Reva R. McNeil 5820 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.01-04-08.00-0000 Glenn & Janice W. Claxton 3831 Kirk Hollow Road Shawsville, VA 24162 064.01-04-06.00-0000 David J. & Stephanie C. Shively 5774 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.01-04-05.00-0000 H.M. & Karen E. Montgomery 5760 Prunty Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.00-01-04.00-0000 Emmett I. Jr. & Mary C. Grisso 5475 Glenmary Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.01-03-01.00-0000 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 064.01-03-04.00-0000 Joe A. Boone Revocable Living Trust Joe A. Boone Trustee 2848 Waidsboro Road Ferrum, VA 24088 064.01-03-04.01-0000 Joe A. Boone 2848 Waidsboro Road Ferrum, VA 24088 064.01-03-02.00-0000 Robert A. Chapman 4676 Red Barn Lane NE Roanoke, VA 24012 064.01-01-30.00-0000 Edward J. & Judy R. Aesy 5767 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 Center for Research & Technology Adjacent Property Owners Tax Map # Property Owner/Address 064.01-01-29.00-0000 Edward J. & Judy R. Aesy 5767 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-28.00-0000 David R. Henderson 2686 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-27.00-0000 Ernest J. Jackson, III 5747 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-26.00-0000 William E. & Peggy H. Duncan 5741 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-24.00-0000 Billy G. & Barbara B. Luper 5735 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-23.00-0000 Melissa C. Conner 5723 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-22.00-0000 James A. & Angela A. Martin 5717 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-21.00-0000 Lori D. Coleman & Steve E. Chewning 5711 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-20.00-0000 Kevin L. & Tonya D. Hall 5705 Edgewood Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-03.00-0000 Joseph C. Jr. & A. Julia Thomas 6618 Campbell Drive Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-02.01-0000 Michael J. Main 4929 West Main Street Salem, VA 24153 064.01-01-02.00-0000 Betty G. Main Life Estate 4929 West Main Street Salem, VA 24153 064.02-03-09.02-0000 Robert R. & Kevin L. Radford 5678 Hickory Drive Salem, VA 24153 Amendments to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants for Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology January 2019 (For Informational Purposes Only) DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH Ft TECHNOLOGY JANUARY 2019 ARTICLE I - GENERAL DECLARATIONS AND PERMITTED USES A. Purpose The purpose of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants are to ensure that the property designated as the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology will be developed and maintained in an attractive, park -like campus setting for science and technology businesses, research and development businesses, corporate offices and environmentally appropriate manufacturing uses as approved under the terms and conditions set forth in this document and in accordance with the approved zoning of the property. B. Definitions 14. Business or Businesses: The owner(s), lessee(s), or occupant(s), including prospective owners, lessees or occupants of the Property. 24. Center: Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 3-5. Improvements: Any and all improvements made to or constructed upon the Property including, but not limited to roads, buildings, structures, tanks and storage containers, drainage and utility facilities, driveway and parking areas, grading, landscaping, fencing, screening devices, site lighting, communication devices, signs, and all similar or related structures or improvements. 1 46. Center Master Plan: The general development plan and a land use plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, including infrastructure, road and parcel design as approved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 5-7. Community: The Glenvar Community Planning Area as defined by the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 69. Property or Properties: The parcel or parcels of land, including any improvements thereon, located in the Center, as set forth in any deed, option, lease, agreement, or agreement of sale applicable to these restrictions. 7.9. Restrictions: The covenants, design guidelines, conditions and restrictions contained in this document. 40. Park. � 844. Setback: The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from a street right-of-way or lot line. 942. Transfer: Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Property, any portion thereof, or any interest therein, by contract, deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assignment, lease, operation of law, or other means, to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary or involuntary. In the case of a non -publicly held corporation, the assignment or other transfer of fifty percent (50%) or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constitute a Transfer, unless made to the corporations parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation. In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assignment of partnership interests in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the partnership interests shall constitute a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of its membership interests shall constitute a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constitute a Transfer. N 844. Setback: The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from a street right-of-way or lot line. 942. Transfer: Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Property, any portion thereof, or any interest therein, by contract, deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assignment, lease, operation of law, or other means, to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary or involuntary. In the case of a non -publicly held corporation, the assignment or other transfer of fifty percent (50%) or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constitute a Transfer, unless made to the corporations parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation. In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assignment of partnership interests in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the partnership interests shall constitute a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of its membership interests shall constitute a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constitute a Transfer. N C. Applicability These Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, including the land use regulations and building requirements, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in and to the real property or any portion thereof, and shall be incorporated in any Transfer of the Property as covenants running with the Property. The County Administrator shall record applicable documents and revisions associated with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants with the Roanoke County Clerk of the Circuit Court. Invalidation of any of the provisions of these guidelines and covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, or parts thereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. D. Land Uses and Development Standards 1. Uses Permitted The Center shall be developed exclusively as established in the Center Master Plan for uses designated and incorporated herein. All properties shall be developed in accordance with the design guidelines and requirements set forth in these Covenants and Development Standards. All uses shall enhance the natural and scenic qualifies of the business park and be environmentally friendly with efficient, clean operations. Noise and lighting shall be considered environmental factors in evaluating a potential land use. All manufacturing operations and stefage shall be located within fully enclosed buildings. Properties within the Center shall be used only for the uses listed on the Center Master Ply emeses. Land uses not listed on the Center Master Plan are prohibited. b. -- --, --=---- -- -- - n o esse_, =-- ---=, -- la --- ----- -- --- p-------- --- 2. Development Standards The use and development of all properties in the Center shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Article III of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. ARTICLE II: ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES �A.Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County . Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans4o-t4e provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. ■ r. r. ■ . r . �A.Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County . Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans4o-t4e provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. .. M.1 r_ �A.Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County . Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans4o-t4e provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. 1�Plans will be subject to all applicable federal and state laws and County ordinances. Pertinent ordinances of the County include, but may not be limited to: Zoning, Subdivision, Storm Water Management, Erosion/Sediment Control and Steep Slope Ordinances, as amended. C—.B. Subdivision, in General All property within the Center shall be subdivided in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. The minimum lot size in the Center is one acre. 4.C. Project Review Process All proposed improvements and land uses within the Center shall be reviewed by the County and 0qe BesigR ReN4ew Tea V, as set forth below. Initially, proposed improvements and land uses shall be discussed with the County Department of Economic Development for general consistency with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 2. After the initial review, the County Department of Economic Development shall ^mange fef a meeting of 444 r esi ,-, Re,4ew Team ,a forward preliminary improvement or land use information, as specified in Section DE -below, to the 1 esig _ ReN4ew Team Zoning Administrator for review and recommendation. -- - ---- - of -- - final EleN,e4ap+nent- - Zoning- - ---- --• -573_Upon receiving a final development plan, the Zoning Administrator shall ensure that the proposed improvement is consistent with all applicable County regulations a -RE ,.," pr-oper-t-y4' 6-4. 14na4 Elevelopme++t plans sl4a4 be made &�,a4able to the Pesign Re,4ew Team p4of to fina4 plan appr-ov 5 -F --.D. Project Review Procedures All proposed development and land uses shall be reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. For the purposes of Coun review of the proposed land development, preliminary plans for site development and buildings are to include the following information: 1. Plans shall be of a suitable scale and size to permit reasonable review of the proposed development. 2. Plans shall provide applicable information on lot size, building size, parking areas, and areas for landscaping/open space and screening. 3. Plans shall indicate the footprint of all proposed buildings and structures to be located on the site. Future improvements shall be shown as proposed future development. 4. Plans shall indicate building setbacks, right-of-way limits, and utility or other easements. 5. Plans shall indicate any natural watercourses or proposed areas for storm water management. 6. Plans shall indicate the location of large stands of trees and/or single large -canopy trees on the property. 7. Plans should include a preliminary grading plan, if available. 8. Plans should provide additional information on signage, lighting, fencing, refuse collection, trails or other site development elements, if available. 9. Plans shall include preliminary building elevations showing building facade elements, exterior materials, and accessory elements (i.e. lot lighting fixtures, sign structures). 10. Plans shall include general location information for any exterior or support utilities. E. Maintenance of Improvements All properties, buildings, structures and improvements shall be maintained in a neat, clean and attractive condition at all times. Landscaping and open grass areas shall be kept clean and free from weeds, underbrush, trash and debris at all times. Painted and exposed metal surfaces shall be maintained and kept free from peeling or rust. Parking areas and drives shall be paved and damaged pavement or hard surfaces repaired. Property owners shall promptly replace any dead or damaged landscaping approved as part of the landscaping plan for the Property. QF. Enforcement Enforcement of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall be undertaken by the owners of the Center an be4a'r of floe G, unt), b), the 7,,F, ng Ad,-Ainistfataf. In the event of a violation, the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall have the ultimate jurisdiction to enforce or interpret any of the restrictions, conditions, covenants, and liens now or hereafter imposed by these Development Guidelines and Protective Co Covenants. Failure to enforce any provision contained in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the provisions, whether the violation is singular or repetitive. ARTICLE III: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Center. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply. A. Site Development Environmental Features: The natural environment and vistas of the Center are significant contributing park features that shall be considered in siting new development and buildings on the property. a. Natural features such as streams, stands of mature trees and scenic vistas shall be identified in early planning and development designed to enhance such features for the benefit of all park inhabitants and the community. b. Grading for the development should emphasize natural landforms and scenic vistas. Where substantial site grading may be required, careful design consideration shall be given to building floor and elevation alternatives in order to minimize effects on the natural environment and incorporate natural amenities into the development. 2. Green Development Encouraged: Site development and new buildings shall consider and incorporate green development options and sustainable development were possible. Development is encouraged that is consistent with the U. S. Green Building Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards. 3. Buffer Areas: Dedicated buffers are established in the Center to protect adjacent residential properties. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet. These buffers are shown on the Center Master Plan. There shall be no private development or operations located within these buffers. Where development is proposed adjacent to these buffers, every effort shall be made to foster compatibility between the land uses and to ensure that appropriate measures are undertaken to minimize potential development impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation, and hours of operation. r-egafding apffapfiate tises ffiid este �e ef€ee4s e 4. Circulation: New buildings shall be designed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity in public areas and in open spaces or along greenways. Linkages to public areas shall be included in the design of the site and buildings. Linkages between other Center properties are encouraged, where feasible and appropriate. 7 r. ARTICLE III: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Center. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply. A. Site Development Environmental Features: The natural environment and vistas of the Center are significant contributing park features that shall be considered in siting new development and buildings on the property. a. Natural features such as streams, stands of mature trees and scenic vistas shall be identified in early planning and development designed to enhance such features for the benefit of all park inhabitants and the community. b. Grading for the development should emphasize natural landforms and scenic vistas. Where substantial site grading may be required, careful design consideration shall be given to building floor and elevation alternatives in order to minimize effects on the natural environment and incorporate natural amenities into the development. 2. Green Development Encouraged: Site development and new buildings shall consider and incorporate green development options and sustainable development were possible. Development is encouraged that is consistent with the U. S. Green Building Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards. 3. Buffer Areas: Dedicated buffers are established in the Center to protect adjacent residential properties. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet. These buffers are shown on the Center Master Plan. There shall be no private development or operations located within these buffers. Where development is proposed adjacent to these buffers, every effort shall be made to foster compatibility between the land uses and to ensure that appropriate measures are undertaken to minimize potential development impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation, and hours of operation. r-egafding apffapfiate tises ffiid este �e ef€ee4s e 4. Circulation: New buildings shall be designed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity in public areas and in open spaces or along greenways. Linkages to public areas shall be included in the design of the site and buildings. Linkages between other Center properties are encouraged, where feasible and appropriate. 7 B. BuildinLs 1. Siting and Location: . a. Buildings shall be located on the site such that the development establishes an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and parking and enhances the natural and man-made features of the Center. b. Buildings shall be sited on the property to relate to primary street(s) in the Center. c. Building setbacks shall be consistent with established zoning regulations and shall consider relationships to buildings on adjacent properties, particularly as it may affect views and street appearances. 2. Height: Building height shall be as set forth by Roanoke County Zoning, as amended. a. Proposed building heights shall consider relationships to adjacent building heights, natural features and scenic vistas. b. Variable building heights are encouraged. 3. Design: All development shall meet the following design standards for exterior facades, materials, appurtenances and equipment. a. General Building Design i. The architectural composition, scale, elements, and details of a building shall relate to the site's natural features and character of the surrounding area and development. ii. Landscaping shall be an integral component of the exterior design of any building. iii. All buildings shall minimize potential impacts from noise, light, and traffic. b. Building Facades and Materials: i. Buildings shall employ various architectural forms to create visual character and interest. Buildings shall be segmented with distinct masses of vertical and horizontal elements to minimize bulkiness. ii. Front building facades and those facing public streets shall be designed to exhibit attractive architectural features, materials, dimensions and symmetry. Brick, stone, architectural masonry and glass are the preferred exterior materials. Metal may be permitted when it is used in conjunction with other preferred architectural materials or when not visible from public streets. iii. All building facades shall be painted and/or finished architecturally in a manner that is consistent with these standards and with other properties in the Center. Paint colors should be compatible with the visual character of the Center. Two or more colors are encouraged to highlight architectural details and materials. iv. Building walls shall include dimensional architectural features (i.e. indentations, overhangs, entrance canopies, etc.) to provide attractive building mass and proportional building elements. Building walls are encouraged to be variable and not consist of expansive surfaces without a physical and visual break. v. Building entries shall be clearly visible and articulated using architectural features, elements and materials. vi. Windows shall be visible on all publicly -oriented building facades. The size and location of windows shall relate to the scale and proportions of the building elevation on which they are located. vii. Roofs shall be designed to be an integral component of the architecture of the building. Multiple roof lines and offsets are encouraged. Also, roof designs are encouraged to incorporate "green' technologies, as recommended by LEED standards. c. Building Appurtenances and Equipment: i. Where required, roof mounted equipment and vents shall be located in an inconspicuous location and shall be reasonably screened from public street views by painted panels, opaque screens, or other effective methods. ii. All exterior equipment shall be designed to minimize noise and shall include appropriate insulation materials or technologies to control outside noise. iii. Exposed features such as gutters, downspouts, vents, towers, etc. shall be designed to match the color of surfaces to which they are attached. 9 C. Parking, Loading Areas and Docks 2L.1_Parking for visitors shall be located in close proximity to the main building entrance and shall be setback from the public street so as to not interfere with or detract from the primary street views of the building. �2. All parking areas shall be landscaped both internally and externally to enhance the architecture of the building, the site, and the Center. &3. Lighting in parking and loading areas shall be as described in the following section on Lighting. D. Utilities Underground Utilities: All utilities shall be located underground, unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. 2. Public Water and Sewer: All developments shall be served by public water and sewer systems. 3. Storm Water Management Areas: Low -impact design (L.I.D.) methods of managing storm water shall be considered in designing the development. All storm water management areas shall be landscaped appropriately and maintained. Management areas and drainage channels shall blend with the landscaping of the site and incorporate natural materials and vegetation. E. Wastes No external waste treatment or storage facilities are permitted. 2. Bulk containers for trash are permitted, provided they are constructed in accordance with the standards for accessory structures. Palette of Lighting Fixtures: The County has a selected palette of lighting fixtures recommended for both private and public development areas within the Center. Examples of recommended lighting fixtures are shown in Exhibit 1. 2. Lighting, In General: a. All lighting in the Center shall be in accordance with lighting standards established in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. All lighting in the Center shall be directed inward toward the building/site, and shall be shielded and directed downward to control extraneous light or glare. All light shall be 10 contained within property boundaries. Where development is located adjacent to buffers and residential properties, dark/mght sky friendly lighting using full cutoff lighting fixtures is encouraged so that there is no direct light upward and no glare. G. Accessory Structures Walls and Fences: Walls and fences shall complement the architecture of the building and be of materials that architecturally enhance the building and the Center. a. Fences skishould not be wed- 1p aced in front yards except as necessary for safety and secu= p=oses. Where fencing is needed, decorative metal fencing is preferred fere ng is nE4 i..,,F+ni ,-„a , r4ss 4 is net N4sii.4„ 4e+ pab4 e st+ , . Barbed wire or razor wire is are prohibited except as necessary for safety and security purposes. b. Where retaining walls are required in the front yard or where they are visible from public areas, wall materials shall be stone or finished masonry. Retaining walls higher than 8 feet are discouraged. Long expanses of wall surfaces shall be offset and be appropriately landscaped. c. As an alternative to traditional retaining walls, "green walls" consisting of architectural concrete block, covered with a rapidly -growing groundcover, may be permitted in less visible areas. d. Terraced wall systems are encouraged supplemented with plantings on the flat terraces. 2. Outbuildings: All accessory buildings shall be consistent with the architecture of the primary building. ^ ,,,,,,....e_ ,, , a4d*+gs ,and should 44a4 -be located behind the primary building, where feasibleof s4a4 nE4 be ,,;.. b4e fFef , pt+b e ..t.,,,,,,-. 3. Trash Enclosures: Areas for trash collection shall be accessible for service. All trash areas shall be fully enclosed and screened from view by opaque fencing and supplemental landscaping. Enclosures must be architecturally consistent and compatible with the design of the primary building. 11 W � C 0 m cc i Ll Lu o"* ui m aD -0 — vi E � p m �, x cu � cry Z7 t �. LL N= N L "D Q) lg C C N u O '"aim N = x © `3 va C X t:[xs rn a7 a)#) x Q3 t3 d7 i sla C Q C .� j Q '?C i QJ Y N vi to _ U +. D 17 Q O �] >. T3 N D N � C C MM N 4 +-° N X �,E� m"EC.-0a� H�0M CL' c� cv iS3 N E m N CL L C �] mC � u — N N l] Lu 'o ca Ll U7 z7 w m E tl} D E 3 �3 4- co �, V N m D iy= m _ N Q� Q% CLm a Qcn is N w 0 Co to a) 0c L m C) L_1 QJ m L C Z D C 0> .� E CL .o Q1 Q} rn c 70 r- {a O)p [.) a] aim m c C3im .:j Z cm 65 E .0) J m r- J E W � C 0 m cc i Ll Lu o"* H. Landscaping 1. Landscape Palette: 4444 Cau++ ),14as a selee e A palette for landscaping is recommended in both private and public areas within the Center. Examples of recommended landscaping are shown in Exhibit 2. 2. Site and Building Landscaping: Property and building designs shall include appropriate trees, shrubs, open grass areas, and flowers to enhance development and the Center. a. Properties shall be developed in accordance with the screening and landscaping provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Trees are encouraged along street frontages, in parking areas and adjacent to buildings to complement the building scale. c. Landscaping shall be used to define entrances to buildings and parking areas, as well as screen accessory structures, loading areas and outdoor equipment areas. 3. Parking Lot Landscaping: a. Landscaping of parking areas shall be as required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Planting islands should exhibit a well-maintained, finished appearance. 4. Buffers: a. Where buffer yards are required, landscaping shall meet the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet as shown on the Center Master Plan. 13 E � �-O C O Cl) U) N 0 tU � fL1 � C Cf SCS rI7 0 ' C m ) 0 C — t15 C O 3: V, r r� w'a rri� m a 5 W wE, 6 •� cn m C O_>C N C C CO I C L v3 < vi � C fa 0 p vEv C O !! O U'> 3:w sof _ M CL F — 0 y, in � O •� ❑7 � 43 Q �Cc M C _U cam ► 2 Ca M O O .N V) j m C U U i al L r .0 0 V) d) d) fA (I7 as 0 E .n C C V) W .— U) (n:3m m vi � CL [�D L ��E. Q3 t71 Z W > C:M m Q. E -C C7 C u7 `l`3 ja C [74 < E 07 - W 'o �i1 000 mgt h- iti d O Ln CSJ p 4� 'r r. L SgiLs 1. Sign Palette: 4444 C^„++5, 14as a selee eE A palette fermis recommended for public and private signage within the Center. Examples of recommended signs are shown in Exhibits 3 and 4. .,. 3.2. Sign Size and Design: a. The sign shall be designed to be integrated and coordinated with the building to complement the building design in scale, color and materials. e:b. Lighting shall be from directed, shielded sources toward the sign. Signs shall not be back lighted. Vic. Signs shall not include any motion devices or changing text. e.d. Roof signs and portable signs are not permitted. 43. Directional Signs: Directional signs shall be located as necessary to direct visitors, customers and employees to designated parking or loading areas. Directional signs shall be kept to a minimum and shall not include any logo or company identification. Directional signs shall be 3 square feet or less in size and shall not be lighted. 4. Temporary Signs: Temporary signs for the purposes of construction activity or the sale of real estate shall be as permitted by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. No other temporary signs are permitted. 15 01 6 tU Da F. Ca) m -0-0 °E cn0 U) @ Dy Q r .O V C2 U 0 7 0 0 o c us o CL E6 r a` -E cn 09 4l -0 s%) C3? ill 0 .in N X C CD M a) C U("y ..r �L O) C ol m to Ul 4) C 3 E N F 5.0 U50 U , ofED -0 c c mm v�0.0 cn c '~ `. (D .L cil a H Ga 6l C C co CSl o LU Z 71WD c E N C C F E _ �Z r C M m C C 76 cz �- 3. -D T C — M II%1 - U- v cu 00 a)(0 m > +n3 caE 0 CCz �sQ� c c c c QS.Lm m a; 'N rn c" i rA 0 lit H R S F J Z 71WD t a cz t a � � cl� �. � X LIA o £ c g E 40 7 .g � ƒ a LM / 2 � 3 ± 2 k CY)2 - 2 ? & 6 / ° 2 \ E m 0 _ a• E =G2 m - �/)k2 D \ x 2 7E:E — > ¢ w m / \ / / E o/ % § U = M o I \ 7 E_' E m o m o£ p \ o-0 E £ cn n E ® ® j —0 o m E o cn ? G § / o @ \ % = .§ E / / k cr m a E 7 CL M� o m £.g 2 E CU / E § \ - )% E k I > &_/ 0 m m m 3£ o% & 2 £ -0 0 — / o E § -0 3 o @ » £ h 0) I n £ ± E U � @ co E � -0 _ _ I E — � g § M o m 0 0 0 m � 5 £ ' o = e o % 2 y.LM cm Fn \ S 2'7 E / Fn ? u § — m —C:_ © 2 Co m 0 ® a)- 0 a 0 E_� E E _ @.� E'$ �- / = o @ m m-0 2 o 0 0 -- L) 2 % m E E. = _ / .� § c\ g q 3 O w 3 w WU- m £ . . . . . I. Transportation Elements 1. Access Points: Site access points shall be kept to a minimum and consolidated. New driveway entrances shall be coordinated with existing entrances and adjacent uses for safe traffic circulation. .�ee�� . rr�rirfi�sss. es�rsi��� J. Temporary Construction Structures and Utilities: 1. Construction activities shall be in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local land disturbing regulations. 2. Site access shall be restricted to one location on the public street. 3. Temporary construction structures, portable offices and other related facilities shall be maintained in good condition and arranged in a compact and organized manner on the site. Facilities shall be situated so that they are unobtrusive and attractive when seen from the road or adjacent properties. All temporary structures and portable facilities shall be removed upon the completion of construction activity and before permanent occupancy of the building. 4. All temporary construction utilities shall be in a single, unobtrusive alignment. Distribution to the various areas of construction shall be from an approved, on-site location. 5. Areas for the storage of construction equipment and materials shall be coordinated and be visually unobtrusive from the public road and adjacent properties. Mobile equipment shall be aligned in an orderly manner at the end of each work day. 6. Construction debris shall not be allowed to accumulate during construction. It shall be removed daily or located in a visually screened place if debris is to be removed less frequently. Open burning of debris is not permitted. After construction is complete, any temporary barriers, surplus materials, and all trash and debris shall be removed from the site. All backfill materials shall be cleared of any building materials, stone, or debris. K. Design and Maintenance of Common Public Areas 1. Standards for Greenways and Trails: Trails and greenways established in the Center shall be constructed in accordance with County adopted recreational standards. Trails shall be a minimum of four feet in width and shall have paved or stabilized surfaces to provide safe surfaces for users and minimize erosion. Steep trails may be constructed with an earth surface using appropriate construction techniques to minimize erosion. 2. Maintenance of Common Public Areas: All public areas used by businesses and visitors shall be maintained and kept in a safe and attractive condition. Where there is joint use of facilities, such as trails or open space areas across private areas, public access and maintenance shall be negotiated under separate agreement with the County Adm44stfat and the Center property owner. I: DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH 8t TECHNOLOGY JANUARY 2019 ARTICLE I - GENERAL DECLARATIONS AND PERMITTED USES A. Purpose The purpose of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants are to ensure that the property designated as the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology will be developed and maintained in an attractive, park -like campus setting for science and technology businesses, research and development businesses, corporate offices and environmentally appropriate manufacturing uses as approved under the terms and conditions set forth in this document and in accordance with the approved zoning of the property. B. Definitions 1. Business or Businesses: The owner(s), lessee(s), or occupant(s), including prospective owners, lessees or occupants of the Property. 2. Center: Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 3. Improvements: Any and all improvements made to or constructed upon the Property including, but not limited to roads, buildings, structures, tanks and storage containers, drainage and utility facilities, driveway and parking areas, grading, landscaping, fencing, screening devices, site lighting, communication devices, signs, and all similar or related structures or improvements. 4. Center Master Plan: The general development plan and a land use plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, including infrastructure, road and parcel design as approved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 5. Community: The Glenvar Community Planning Area as defined by the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 6. Property or Properties: The parcel or parcels of land, including any improvements thereon, located in the Center, as set forth in any deed, option, lease, agreement, 1 or agreement of sale applicable to these restrictions. 7. Restrictions: The covenants, design guidelines, conditions and restrictions contained in this document. 8. Setback: The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from a street right-of-way or lot line. 9. Transfer: Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Property, any portion thereof, or any interest therein, by contract, deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assignment, lease, operation of law, or other means, to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary or involuntary. In the case of a non -publicly held corporation, the assignment or other transfer of fifty percent (50%) or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constitute a Transfer, unless made to the corporations parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation. In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assignment of partnership interests in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the partnership interests shall constitute a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of its membership interests shall constitute a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constitute a Transfer. C. Applicability These Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, including the land use regulations and building requirements, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in and to the real property or any portion thereof, and shall be incorporated in any Transfer of the Property as covenants running with the Property. The County Administrator shall record applicable documents and revisions associated with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants with the Roanoke County Clerk of the Circuit Court. Invalidation of any of the provisions of these guidelines and covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, or parts thereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. D. Land Uses and Development Standards 1. Uses Permitted The Center shall be developed exclusively as established in the Center Master Plan for uses designated and incorporated herein. All properties shall be developed in accordance with the design guidelines and requirements set forth in these Covenants and Development Standards. All uses shall enhance the natural and scenic qualities of the business park and be environmentally friendly with W efficient, clean operations. Noise and lighting shall be considered environmental factors in evaluating a potential land use. All manufacturing operations shall be located within fully enclosed buildings. Properties within the Center shall be used only for the uses listed on the Center Master Plan. Land uses not listed on the Center Master Plan are prohibited. 2. Development Standards The use and development of all properties in the Center shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Article III of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. ARTICLE II: ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES A. Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County. Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans, provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. Plans will be subject to all applicable federal and state laws and County ordinances. Pertinent ordinances of the County include, but may not be limited to: Zoning, Subdivision, Storm Water Management, Erosion/Sediment Control and Steep Slope Ordinances, as amended. B. Subdivision, in General All property within the Center shall be subdivided in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. The minimum lot size in the Center is one acre. C. Project Review Process All proposed improvements and land uses within the Center shall be reviewed by the County as set forth below. 1. Initially, proposed improvements and land uses shall be discussed with the County Department of Economic Development for general consistency with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 2. After the initial review, the County Department of Economic Development shall forward preliminary improvement or land use information, as specified in Section D below, to the Zoning Administrator for review and recommendation. 3. Upon receiving a final development plan, the Zoning Administrator shall ensure that the proposed improvement is consistent with all applicable County regulations. D. Project Review Procedures All proposed development and land uses shall be reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. For the purposes of County review of the proposed land development, preliminary plans for site development and buildings are to include the following information: 1. Plans shall be of a suitable scale and size to permit reasonable review of the proposed development. 2. Plans shall provide applicable information on lot size, building size, parking areas, and areas for landscaping/open space and screening. 3. Plans shall indicate the footprint of all proposed buildings and structures to be located on the site. Future improvements shall be shown as proposed future development. 4. Plans shall indicate building setbacks, right-of-way limits, and utility or other easements. 5. Plans shall indicate any natural watercourses or proposed areas for storm water management. 6. Plans shall indicate the location of large stands of trees and/or single large -canopy trees on the property. 7. Plans should include a preliminary grading plan, if available. 8. Plans should provide additional information on signage, lighting, fencing, refuse collection, trails or other site development elements, if available. 9. Plans shall include preliminary building elevations showing building facade elements, exterior materials, and accessory elements (i.e. lot lighting fixtures, sign structures). 10. Plans shall include general location information for any exterior or support utilities. E. Maintenance of Improvements All properties, buildings, structures and improvements shall be maintained in a neat, clean and attractive condition at all times. Landscaping and open grass areas shall be kept clean and free from weeds, underbrush, trash and debris at all times. Painted and exposed metal surfaces shall be maintained and kept free from peeling or rust. Parking areas and drives shall be paved and damaged pavement or hard surfaces repaired. Property owners shall promptly replace any dead or damaged landscaping approved as part of the landscaping plan for the Property. F. Enforcement Enforcement of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall be undertaken by the owners of the Center. In the event of a violation, the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall have the ultimate jurisdiction to enforce or interpret any of the restrictions, conditions, covenants, and liens now or hereafter imposed by these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. Failure to enforce any provision contained in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the provisions, whether the violation is singular or repetitive. E ARTICLE III: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Center. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply. A. Site Development 1. Environmental Features: The natural environment and vistas of the Center are significant contributing park features that shall be considered in siting new development and buildings on the property. a. Natural features such as streams, stands of mature trees and scenic vistas shall be identified in early planning and development designed to enhance such features for the benefit of all park inhabitants and the community. b. Grading for the development should emphasize natural landforms and scenic vistas. Where substantial site grading may be required, careful design consideration shall be given to building floor and elevation alternatives in order to minimize effects on the natural environment and incorporate natural amenities into the development. 2. Green Development Encouraged: Site development and new buildings shall consider and incorporate green development options and sustainable development were possible. Development is encouraged that is consistent with the U. S. Green Building Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards. 3. Buffer Areas: Dedicated buffers are established in the Center to protect adjacent residential properties. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet. These buffers are shown on the Center Master Plan. There shall be no private development or operations located within these buffers. Where development is proposed adjacent to these buffers, every effort shall be made to foster compatibility between the land uses and to ensure that appropriate measures are undertaken to minimize potential development impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation, and hours of operation. 4. Circulation: New buildings shall be designed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity in public areas and in open spaces or along greenways. Linkages to public areas shall be included in the design of the site and buildings. Linkages between other Center properties are encouraged, where feasible and appropriate. 1. Siting and Location: a. Buildings shall be located on the site such that the development establishes an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and parking and enhances the natural and man-made features of the Center. b. Buildings shall be sited on the property to relate to primary street(s) in the Center. 5 c. Building setbacks shall be consistent with established zoning regulations and shall consider relationships to buildings on adjacent properties, particularly as it may affect views and street appearances. 2. Height: Building height shall be as set forth by Roanoke County Zoning, as amended. a. Proposed building heights shall consider relationships to adjacent building heights, natural features and scenic vistas. b. Variable building heights are encouraged. 3. Design: All development shall meet the following design standards for exterior facades, materials, appurtenances and equipment. a. General Building Design: i. The architectural composition, scale, elements, and details of a building shall relate to the site's natural features and character of the surrounding area and development. ii. Landscaping shall be an integral component of the exterior design of any building. iii. All buildings shall minimize potential impacts from noise, light, and traffic. b. Building Facades and Materials: i. Buildings shall employ various architectural forms to create visual character and interest. Buildings shall be segmented with distinct masses of vertical and horizontal elements to minimize bulkiness. ii. Front building facades and those facing public streets shall be designed to exhibit attractive architectural features, materials, dimensions and symmetry. Brick, stone, architectural masonry and glass are the preferred exterior materials. Metal may be permitted when it is used in conjunction with other preferred architectural materials or when not visible from public streets. iii. All building facades shall be painted and/or finished architecturally in a manner that is consistent with these standards and with other properties in the Center. Paint colors should be compatible with the visual character of the Center. Two or more colors are encouraged to highlight architectural details and materials. iv. Building walls shall include dimensional architectural features (i.e. indentations, overhangs, entrance canopies, etc.) to provide attractive building mass and proportional building elements. Building walls are encouraged to be variable and not consist of expansive surfaces without a physical and visual break. v. Building entries shall be clearly visible and articulated using architectural features, elements and materials. C� vi. Windows shall be visible on all publicly -oriented building facades. The size and location of windows shall relate to the scale and proportions of the building elevation on which they are located. vii. Roofs shall be designed to be an integral component of the architecture of the building. Multiple roof lines and offsets are encouraged. Also, roof designs are encouraged to incorporate "green' technologies, as recommended by LEED standards. c. Building AXTurtenances and Equipment: i. Where required, roof mounted equipment and vents shall be located in an inconspicuous location and shall be reasonably screened from public street views by painted panels, opaque screens, or other effective methods. ii. All exterior equipment shall be designed to minimize noise and shall include appropriate insulation materials or technologies to control outside noise. iii. Exposed features such as gutters, downspouts, vents, towers, etc. shall be designed to match the color of surfaces to which they are attached. C. Parking, Lg oading Areas and Docks 1. Parking for visitors shall be located in close proximity to the main building entrance and shall be setback from the public street so as to not interfere with or detract from the primary street views of the building. 2. All parking areas shall be landscaped both internally and externally to enhance the architecture of the building, the site, and the Center. 3. Lighting in parking and loading areas shall be as described in the following section on Lighting. D. Utilities 1. Underground Utilities: All utilities shall be located underground, unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. 2. Public Water and Sewer: All developments shall be served by public water and sewer systems. 3. Storm Water Management Areas: Low -impact design (L.I.D.) methods of managing storm water shall be considered in designing the development. All storm water management areas shall be landscaped appropriately and maintained. Management areas and drainage charnels shall blend with the landscaping of the site and incorporate natural materials and vegetation. E. Wastes 1. No external waste treatment or storage facilities are permitted. 2. Bulk containers for trash are permitted, provided they are constructed in accordance with the standards for accessory structures. 7 1. Palette of Lighting Fixtures: The County has a selected palette of lighting fixtures recommended for both private and public development areas within the Center. Examples of recommended lighting fixtures are shown in Exhibit 1. 2. Lighting, In General: a. All lighting in the Center shall be in accordance with lighting standards established in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. All lighting in the Center shall be directed inward toward the building/site, and shall be shielded and directed downward to control extraneous light or glare. All light shall be contained within property boundaries. Where development is located adjacent to buffers and residential properties, dark/night sky friendly lighting using full cutoff lighting fixtures is encouraged so that there is no direct light upward and no glare. G. Accessory Structures Walls and Fences: Walls and fences shall complement the architecture of the building and be of materials that architecturally enhance the building and the Center. a. Fences should not be placed in front yards except as necessary for safety and security purposes. Where fencing is needed, decorative metal fencing is preferred. Barbed wire or razor wire are prohibited except as necessary for safety and security purposes. b. Where retaining walls are required in the front yard or where they are visible from public areas, wall materials shall be stone or finished masonry. Retaining walls higher than 8 feet are discouraged. Long expanses of wall surfaces shall be offset and be appropriately landscaped. c. As an alternative to traditional retaining walls, "green walls" consisting of architectural concrete block, covered with a rapidly -growing groundcover, may be permitted in less visible areas. d. Terraced wall systems are encouraged supplemented with plantings on the flat terraces. 2. Outbuildings: All accessory buildings shall be consistent with the architecture of the primary building ,and should be located behind the primary building, where feasible. 3. Trash Enclosures: Areas for trash collection shall be accessible for service. All trash areas shall be fully enclosed and screened from view by opaque fencing and supplemental landscaping. Enclosures must be architecturally consistent and compatible with the design of the primary building. W � C 0 m cc i Ll Lu o"* ui m aD -0 — vi E � p m �, x cu � cry Z7 t �. LL N= N L "D Q) lg C C N u O '"aim N = x © `3 va C X t:[xs rn a7 a)#) x Q3 t3 d7 i sla C Q C .� j Q '?C i QJ Y N vi to _ U +. D 17 Q O �] >. T3 N D N � C C MM N 4 +-° N X �,E� m"EC.-0a� H�0M CL' c� cv iS3 N E m N CL L C �] mC � u — N N l] Lu 'o ca Ll U7 z7 w m E tl} D E 3 �3 4- co �, V N m D iy= m _ N Q� Q% CLm a Qcn is N w 0 Co to a) 0c L m C) L_1 QJ m L C Z D C 0> .� E CL .o Q1 Q} rn c 70 r- {a O)p [.) a] aim m c C3im .:j Z cm 65 E .0) J m r- J E W � C 0 m cc i Ll Lu o"* H. Landscaping 1. Landscape Palette: A palette for landscaping is recommended in both private and public areas within the Center. Examples of recommended landscaping are shown in Exhibit 2. 2. Site and Building Landscaping: Property and building designs shall include appropriate trees, shrubs, open grass areas, and flowers to enhance development and the Center. a. Properties shall be developed in accordance with the screening and landscaping provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Trees are encouraged along street frontages, in parking areas and adjacent to buildings to complement the building scale. c. Landscaping shall be used to define entrances to buildings and parking areas, as well as screen accessory structures, loading areas and outdoor equipment areas. 3. Parking Lot Landscaping: a. Landscaping of parking areas shall be as required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Planting islands should exhibit a well-maintained, finished appearance. 4. Buffers: a. Where buffer yards are required, landscaping shall meet the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet as shown on the Center Master Plan. 10 E � �-O C O Cl) U) N 0 tU � fL1 � C Cf SCS rI7 0 ' C m ) 0 C — t15 C O 3: V, r r� w'a rri� m a 5 W wE, 6 •� cn m C O_>C N C C CO I C L v3 < vi � C fa 0 p vEv C O !! O U'> 3:w sof _ M CL F — 0 y, in � O •� ❑7 � 43 Q �Cc M C _U cam ► 2 Ca M O O .N V) j m C U U i al L r .0 0 V) d) d) fA (I7 as 0 E .n C C V) W .— U) (n:3m m vi � CL [�D L ��E. Q3 t71 Z W > C:M m Q. E -C C7 C u7 `l`3 ja C [74 < E 07 - W 'o �i1 000 mgt h- iti d O Ln CSJ p 4� 'r r. I. SgiLs 1. Sign Palette: A palette is recommended for public and private signage within the Center. Examples of recommended signs are shown in Exhibits 3 and 4. 2. Sign Size and Design: a. The sign shall be designed to be integrated and coordinated with the building to complement the building design in scale, color and materials. b. Lighting shall be from directed, shielded sources toward the sign. Signs shall not be back lighted. c. Signs shall not include any motion devices or changing text. d. Roof signs and portable signs are not permitted. 3. Directional Signs: Directional signs shall be located as necessary to direct visitors, customers and employees to designated parking or loading areas. Directional signs shall be kept to a minimum and shall not include any logo or company identification. Directional signs shall be 3 square feet or less in size and shall not be lighted. 4. Temporary Signs: Temporary signs for the purposes of construction activity or the sale of real estate shall be as permitted by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. No other temporary signs are permitted. 12 01 6 tU Da F. Ca) m -0-0 °E cn0 U) @ Dy Q r .O V C2 U 0 7 0 0 o c us o CL E6 r a` -E cn 09 4l -0 s%) C3? ill 0 .in N X C CD M a) C U("y ..r �L O) C ol m to Ul 4) C 3 E N F 5.0 U50 U , ofED -0 c c mm v�0.0 cn c '~ `. (D .L cil a H Ga 6l C C co CSl o LU Z 71WD c E N C C F E _ �Z r C M m C C 76 cz �- 3. -D T C — M II%1 - U- v cu 00 a)(0 m > +n3 caE 0 CCz �sQ� c c c c QS.Lm m a; 'N rn c" i rA 0 lit H R S F J Z 71WD t a cz t a � � cl� �. � X LIA o £ c g E 40 7 .g � ƒ a LM / 2 � 3 ± 2 k CY)2 - 2 ? & 6 / ° 2 \ E m 0 _ a• E =G2 m - �/)k2 D \ x 2 7E:E — > ¢ w m / \ / / E o/ % § U = M o I \ 7 E_' E m o m o£ p \ o-0 E £ cn n E ® ® j —0 o m E o cn ? G § / o @ \ % = .§ E / / k cr m a E 7 CL M� o m £.g 2 E CU / E § \ - )% E k I > &_/ 0 m m m 3£ o% & 2 £ -0 0 — / o E § -0 3 o @ » £ h 0) I n £ ± E U � @ co E � -0 _ _ I E — � g § M o m 0 0 0 m � 5 £ ' o = e o % 2 y.LM cm Fn \ S 2'7 E / Fn ? u § — m —C:_ © 2 Co m 0 ® a)- 0 a 0 E_� E E _ @.� E'$ �- / = o @ m m-0 2 o 0 0 -- L) 2 % m E E. = _ / .� § c\ g q 3 O w 3 w WU- m £ . . . . . I. Transportation Elements Access Points: Site access points shall be kept to a minimum and consolidated. New driveway entrances shall be coordinated with existing entrances and adjacent uses for safe traffic circulation. J. Temporary Construction Structures and Utilities: Construction activities shall be in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local land disturbing regulations. 2. Site access shall be restricted to one location on the public street. 3. Temporary construction structures, portable offices and other related facilities shall be maintained in good condition and arranged in a compact and organized manner on the site. Facilities shall be situated so that they are unobtrusive and attractive when seen from the road or adjacent properties. All temporary structures and portable facilities shall be removed upon the completion of construction activity and before permanent occupancy of the building. 4. All temporary construction utilities shall be in a single, unobtrusive alignment. Distribution to the various areas of construction shall be from an approved, on-site location. 5. Areas for the storage of construction equipment and materials shall be coordinated and be visually unobtrusive from the public road and adjacent properties. Mobile equipment shall be aligned in an orderly manner at the end of each work day. 6. Construction debris shall not be allowed to accumulate during construction. It shall be removed daily or located in a visually screened place if debris is to be removed less frequently. Open burning of debris is not permitted. After construction is complete, any temporary barriers, surplus materials, and all trash and debris shall be removed from the site. All backfill materials shall be cleared of any building materials, stone, or debris. K. Design and Maintenance of Common Public Areas Standards for Greenways and Trails: Trails and greenways established in the Center shall be constructed in accordance with County adopted recreational standards. Trails shall be a minimum of four feet in width and shall have paved or stabilized surfaces to provide safe surfaces for users and minimize erosion. Steep trails may be constructed with an earth surface using appropriate construction techniques to minimize erosion. 2. Maintenance of Common Public Areas: All public areas used by businesses and visitors shall be maintained and kept in a safe and attractive condition. Where there is joint use of facilities, such as trails or open space areas across private areas, public access and maintenance shall be negotiated under separate agreement with the County and the Center property owner. 15 + , c t � a A }. M j: ALI - 1 � c ie f Aro, ti - O s > C) N z C 0O U o N D6 0000 p u z O 0 U - 0 0 0 0 N ° 0 O O O O O O U > O O j O O O E0000 U O `) �%aci n„q Q p �� N N 0 zOOO N N U E- O QO O OOO I o W � O -E c: _ _ 2 O O O O � N C O� U O N X O �1"n Q wQ ��p X 10 1 X0000 Q � Owe PTD District Regulations SEC. 30-63. PTD PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. Sec. 30-63-1. Purpose. (A) The planned technology development (PTD) district is established primarily for Type I and Type II manufacturing and industrial uses. Supporting accessory uses and facilities, such as office, commercial establishments, and residential areas are also permitted. The PTD district is intended to be designed with a park -like setting that complements surrounding land uses by means of appropriate siting of buildings, controlled access points, attractive and harmonious architecture, effective landscape buffering and scenic view easements. The district is intended to provide flexibility in design and site layout, allow latitude in combining different use types within a single development, and provide the developer with incentives to create an aesthetically pleasing and functional planned development. In addition, the intent of the planned technology development (PTD) district is to provide certain industries that are clean and environmentally efficient the opportunity to locate in an area of like technologies in what is generally known as a mixed use park, developed under a complete, comprehensive master plan. Standards are provided for landscaping, buffering and open space to encourage high technology industries and to ensure a park- like atmosphere. Important in determining the location and size of a PTD are the accessibility of the location, the availability of public utilities, public safety services and the suitability of the topography for site and building development purposes. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98) Sec. 30-63-2. Permitted uses. (A) All of the residential, civic, office, commercial, industrial and miscellaneous use types listed in article II of this ordinance are permitted in the PTD district. Residential use types shall be limited to no more than fifteen (15) percent of the total gross square footage. No use shall be permitted except in conformity with the uses specifically included in the final master plan. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98) Sec. 30-63-3. Site Development Regulations. (A) Each planned technological development shall be subject to the following site development standards: 1. Minimum district size: 15 acres of contiguous land. 2. Minimum front setbacks: All structures proposed to front on existing public streets external to the PTD shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the existing public right-of-way. PTD District Regulations The zoning administrator shall determine buffer yard requirements based on the existing or proposed use in the PTD and the district in which those uses are permitted. 4. Lot coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be determined through the preliminary master plan process and shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent. Public streets in the PTD district shall be built in accordance with VDOT and Roanoke County standards. In reviewing the PTD preliminary master plan, the commission may recommend, and the board may approve, one (1) or more private streets within the proposed district. Private residential streets in the PTD district shall be built in accordance with the private road standards specified in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Construction details for private residential streets shall be submitted with the PTD preliminary master plan. 6. The applicant may propose a reduction to the number of parking spaces required by this ordinance for each use type, if justified. This proposal will be reviewed with consideration given to potential future uses of the site, parking demand and expansion potential. 7. Maximum height of structures: When adjoining property zoned residential, forty- five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (side, rear, or buffer) adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited. 8. Arrangement of areas: a. The location and arrangement of structures, parking, access drives, outdoor lighting, signs, and other uses and developments within the PTD, in addition to achieving these development standards, shall be accomplished in accordance with an approved final master plan to assure compatibility with the existing and future land use in the vicinity. b. All areas designed for future expansion or not intended for immediate improvement or development shall be specified as reserve areas in the preliminary master plan. The future use and the limitations on future use of such area shall be specified, or else such areas shall not be included as part of the PTD application. Reserve areas included in the PTD shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 9. Accessory structures shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure. 2 PTD District Regulations 10. Every structure in the PTD shall be a fully enclosed building of permanent construction. Any outside storage area shall be fully screened so that no materials so stored are visible at any lot line or public right-of-way. 11. Lighting: Lighting shall comply with section 30-94 of this ordinance. 12. Utilities: Utilities shall be underground unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1,5-24-11) Sec. 30-63-4. Site Development Recommendations. (A) The planned technology development district should be designed and developed as a manufacturing, industrial and technology park with high standards for landscaping, buffering and open space. To ensure a park -like atmosphere the following site development recommendations are made. (1) The principal entrance into the PTD district should be sufficiently landscaped to comply with the purposes of this district. In addition, the first one hundred (100) linear feet of street, leading through this principal entrance into the PTD, should have a landscaped median of sufficient width and planting density to meet the purposes of this district. (2) Parking within the PTD should be located to the side or rear of the principal structures on the lot, wherever feasible. During review, consideration will be given to topographical constraints, innovative site design, buffering and landscaping factors. (3) Loading areas should be screened from public view and should not be placed in front yards. (4) Fences should not be placed in front yards except as necessary for security purposes. Fencing should be uniform and well kept. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98) Sec. 30-63-5. Relationship to Existing Development Regulations. (A) All zoning regulations shall apply to the development of the PTD district, unless modified by the board of supervisors in the approval of the final master plan. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98) PTD District Regulations Sec. 30-63-6. Application process. (A) The timeframes outlined in the section are the maximum timeframes mandated by the Code of Virginia. Roanoke County will make every reasonable effort to complete the application process within a shorter timeframe. (B) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff shall meet to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process. The applicant is encouraged to submit information on the scope and nature of the proposal to allow staff to become familiar with the proposal in advance of this meeting. (C) Any application to rezone land to the PTD designation, shall constitute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to section 30-14. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. (D) The completed rezoning application and supporting preliminary master plan materials shall be submitted to the planning commission for review and analysis. The commission shall review this information and make a report of its findings to the board of supervisors. The commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to section 15.2- 2204 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the commission public hearing. (E) The commission shall make a report of its findings to the board of supervisors within ninety (90) days of the receipt of the materials, unless the applicant requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary master plan. Failure of the commission to make a report of its findings to the board of supervisors within this period shall constitute a commission recommendation of approval. (F) If the commission recommends denial of the preliminary master plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have sixty (60) days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the preliminary master plan, the board of supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. (G) The board of supervisors shall review the preliminary master plan, and after holding a public hearing act to approve or deny the plan within ninety (90) days. Approval of the preliminary master plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to section 30-15 of this ordinance. The plan approved by the board of supervisors shall constitute the final master plan for the PTD. Once approved by the board of supervisors, the administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the PTD district. M PTD District Regulations (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042799-11, § la., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-63-7. Revisions to final master plan. (A) Major revisions to the final master plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of section 30-63-6. Major revisions include, but are not limited to changes such as: 1. Any significant increase in the density of the development; 2. Substantial change in circulation or access; Substantial change in grading or utility provisions; 4. Substantial changes in the mixture of land uses; 5. Substantial change in architectural or site design features of the development; 6. Any other change that the administrator finds is a major divergence from the approved final master plan. (B) All other changes in the final master plan shall be considered minor amendments. The administrator, upon receipt of a written request of the owner, may approve such minor amendments. If the administrator fails to act on a request for a minor amendment to the master plan within thirty (30) calendar days, it shall be considered approved. 2. A request which is disapproved by the administrator shall be considered a major amendment and shall be subject to the approval process outlined above for such amendments. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1,5-24-11) Sec. 30-63-8. Approval of preliminary and final site development plans. (A) Following the approval of the final master plan, the applicant or its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site development plans for any phase or component of the PTD that involves the construction of structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans are found in a document entitled land development procedures, available in the department of community development. PTD District Regulations (B) It is the intent of this section that subdivision review under the subdivision regulations be carried out simultaneously with the review of a planned industrial development under this section. The plans required under this section shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision regulations, as determined by the administrator. (C) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall be in compliance with the final master plan approved by the board of supervisors. Roanoke County shall review and approve or disapprove any final site development plan within sixty (60) days of its submittal. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98; Ord. No. 042799-11, § ld., 4-27-99, Ord. No. 062717-4, § 1, 7-27-17) Sec. 30-63-9. Reserved. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98, Ord. No. 062717-4, § 1,7-27-17) Sec. 30-63-10. Control following approval of final development plans. (A) The zoning administrator shall periodically inspect the site and review all building permits issued for the development to ensure that the development is in general compliance with the submitted schedule. (Ord. No. 92794-17, § 1, 9-27-94; Ord. No. 042898-15, §§ 1, 2, 4-22-98) G7 Principal Industrial: A future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: Agricultural - Industries which involve the manufacturing, storage, marketing and wholesaling of agricultural products. These industries may also be located outside of the Principal Industrial areas, within the rural designations, where agricultural skills may be found. Small Industries and Custom Manufacturing - These industries typically serve a local market and may involve the on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing. Mining and Extraction - These facilities locate according to the availability of natural resources. Industrial - Conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers, storage yards. Industrial Parks - Large tracts of land that are subdivided, developed and designed according to a unified plan. These parks are employment centers and may include mixed land uses including supporting retail services. These types of industries are encouraged to develop in Principal Industrial areas. Planned industrial parks should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian paths into their designs and link these features to surrounding neighborhoods where appropriate. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where industry has historically developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations zoned industrial. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AREAS - Locations identified by Roanoke County as an economic opportunity area. EMPLOYMENT CENTERS - Locations where labor- intensive industries exist. TOPOGRAPHY - Locations that can be developed in an environmentally sensitive manner and that are outside of the designated floodplain. RESOURCE PROTECTION - Locations that can be developed in such a way as not to threaten valuable natural resources. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND SUPPLY - Locations where water and sewer service exist or can be provided in the near future. ACCESS - Locations served by an adequate public street system that does not direct traffic through existing residential neighborhoods. TRANSPORTATION CENTERS - Locations within close proximity to rail, airport and major street systems. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by, or in close proximity to urban services. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 ORDINANCE 452207-12 TO REZONE 25.3 ACRES FROM R- 1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TO PTD, PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT, AND TO AMEND THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND MASTER PLAN ON 454.25 ACRES ZONED PTD, PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT, AT THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (CRT), LOCATED NEAR THE 5300 BLOCK OF GLENMARY DRIVE, UPON THE PETITION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ROANOKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS, INC., AND TECTON PRODUCTS, LLC, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 22, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required bylaw. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows; 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 25.3 acres and described as Tax Map Number 63.00-01-01, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of PTD, Planned Technology District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: The Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, dated 3-9-07. 4. That the petition of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton Products, LLC to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on the 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology Development set out in detail in Exhibit A in Ordinance No. 042799-10, be, and hereby is approved; and 5. That the owners of the 454.25 acres of property described as Tax Map No. 54.00-01-2.00 containing 404.31 acres; Tax Map No. 64.01-05-02 containing 13 acres; Tax Map No. 64.01-05-01 containing 16.94 acres; and Tax Map No. 54.00-01-02.01 containing 20 acres have voluntarily proffered in writing the following AMENDED conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: The Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, dated 3-9-07. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 61 On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance with the recommendation that the additional landscaping of the buffers as suggested by staff be implemented. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Wray, Church, Altizer, Flora, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: Brenda J. H Iton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director, Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning John Murphy, Zoning Administrator William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (CRT) TO ADD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND TO REMOVE AN EXISTING PROFFERED CONDITION ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CATAWBA DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and the other property owners within the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) are requesting to remove the proffered condition from the properties totaling 480.21 acres and to amend the master plan; and WHEREAS, the only proffered condition on these properties incorporates the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants to the zoning of the properties; and WHEREAS, removal of the proffered condition would separate the zoning of the property controlled by the Master Plan and Planned Technology District zoning requirements from the private covenants controlled by the property owners in CRT; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the CRT Master Plan would add development standards (permitted uses, height, lighting, minimum front setbacks, lot overage, subdivision, and signage) to the conceptual rendering of the Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the overall layout of CRT including the road network, potential lots, and buffers remains the same; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019 where no citizens spoke; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment of the Master Plan and the removal of the proffered conditions; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 12, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. The petition of the Economic Development Authority, et al. is approved which mm111 a. Remove the proffered condition dated March 9, 2007; and b. Amend the Master Plan. 2. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice, and will not be a substantial detriment to the community. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. NA AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of Venture Storage Group, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District to construct a mini warehouse storage facility on 3.10 acres, located near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances for a special use permit for a mini warehouse in a commercial district, namely South Peak. BACKGROUND: Mini -warehouse is not a permitted use in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial, Zoning District, but is allowed as a special use. Article IV of the County's Zoning Ordinance includes use and design standards for various uses including mini - warehouse. The proposed mini -warehouse building would be a three-story building approximately 105,000 square feet in size (35,000 square feet per story) containing approximately 695 storage units ranging in size from 5' x 5' to 10' x 20' In addition to the building, the submitted concept plan and building renderings show the construction of 5 new parking spaces for customers, attached building signage, landscaping and dumpster location. Security fencing is not proposed at this time. The entire site and building will be monitored with security cameras. There are a total of 171 existing parking spaces on the Texas Roadhouse restaurant parcel and the subject properties part of the special use permit Page 1 of 3 application. 65 parking spaces are located on the Texas Roadhouse parcel and 106 parking spaces are located on this proposed development. A shared parking agreement allows 43 parking spaces (out of the 106 spaces) to be used with the restaurant use. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. There was one speaker - a lawyer representing several businesses - who spoke in opposition to the request. His concerns included: Potential impact to the community; Whether this request was meeting the vision of the South Peak CDA; The scale and size of the development is inconsistent with the parcel and area; and The project being consistent with the Draft 419 Plan. In addition to the testimony at the public hearing, letters supporting the request and letters raising concerns were received by the Planning Commission. These letters were included in the staff report packet and those received after the packet was mailed were handed out at the public hearing with copies being provided to the applicant. The applicant's representatives during its presentation and through subsequent questions by the Planning Commission provided, but were not limited to, the following information: Addressed the issues in the Texas Roadhouse letter: o Inconsistent use - applicant stated that the proposed use would be compatible due to its low parking needs and low traffic generation rates; o Parking/Easement Agreement - the applicant stated that there is an existing easement agreement that allows for shared parking; the proposed development would not change that agreement; fencing is not proposed on the site; and o Mitigate Impacts - the applicant stated that the site will be landscaped and will utilize the existing access; The use (indoor, self -storage) is closer to retail sales than the previous mini - warehouse uses from the past; The existing parking issues with the site and the adjacent restaurant and how this use has a low parking demand; The difficulties in marketing the site over the years for retail and office uses; Indicated that there were other parcels for commercial development at South Peak besides this site; Issues with the Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) sewer easement had been worked out; The South Peak CDA Pro Forma agreement allows for changes in market Page 2 of 3 conditions to consider uses that were not originally contained in the agreement; Trucks would not be rented from this location; and When asked about the possibility of reducing the building size, they stated they would not reduce the building size. The Planning Commission discussion on this application included, but was not limited to, the following: The Self -storage desktop market study; The tax analysis prepared by Foti, Flynn, Lowen Co. and its assumptions; The potential for other uses in the building; Concerns over the parking agreement; Construction of the building and concerns with the WVWA easement; Building height and lot coverage; The scale of the development; Rezoning of the property to 1-1 versus obtaining special use permit, since the use seemed closer to a warehouse Whether the use would include rental trucks (applicant stated that the use would not include rental trucks); The use of the property; The building's size and the possibility of reducing the building size; and The history of the South Peak (Slate Hill) development over the years. The Planning Commission recommends denial of the special use permit. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the special use permit. Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 4 Susan McCoy - Fwd: [EXTERNAL] - Storage Venture Group, LLC Application From: Philip Thompson To: Rebecca James, Susan McCoy Date: 2/4/2019 5:02 PM Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] - Storage Venture Group, LLC Application Attachments: Attachments.pdf FYI >>> Joe Thompson <joe@thompsonvc.com> 2/4/2019 4:50 PM »> Members of Planning Commission: As someone that encourages growth and development in the Roanoke Valley, I do not generally voice my opinion negatively towards proposed projects. However, I feel this application requires my interjection, being that I commonly deal with highest and best use as a real estate appraiser and as I am a market participant in the local self -storage sector. It was concerning that the applicant selectively chose low revenue generating uses to compare with the proposed mini -warehouse use. Then, to claim these depressed revenue streams were estimated by a highly regarded local accounting firm, when in fact they were generated by the applicant themselves. This is misleading, as one can easily compare to the neighboring successful restaurateur's income stream. At the confirmed average Texas Roadhouse store volume of —$5 Million per year, an average location can produce $200,000 in meals tax over and above the property taxes paid. Let me state clearly that I have an interest in the proposed Kmart conversion located in proximity to the subject. It is for this reason I would like to segregate my correspondence into two distinct components. The bolded bullet point items reflect easily verifiable facts only, while my interjections and/or analyses are not bolded and offer my opinions that could be subjected to some bias. • The Application. Foti, Flynn, Lowery & Co. Letter ■ The application states they asked FFL&Co. to compare three scenarios they view as "the next best use". ■ The only support for these "next best use" scenarios they give is "Based on our research in contacting several retailers and restaurants we have found....... ■ Apparently driving by the Texas Roadhouse restaurant during operating hours was outside of the scope of the applicant's highest and best use analysis, See recent picture of the successful restaurant's parking lot. The applicant's preface for this letter states that they "have ask Foti, Flynn, Lowen Co. to compare the South Peak Land as staying vacant, as Climate Controlled Self Storage Facility, and as a 10,000 square foot office, or medical office or bank." ■ There must be some type of confusion on the applicant's behalf, as FFL&Co. clearly states "These actual and estimated values and estimated receipts are not within the scope of this examination and we have not provided an opinion on them in our examination report." ■ The locally well-regarded accounting firm states, "Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant file:///C:/Users/smccoy/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5C587018PO2 DOMAINM-Z P... 2/5/2019 Page 2 of 4 land, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections based on our examination." ■ It is my opinion that this exhibit is a concerning tactic by the applicant based on the above observations. To put things into perspective: ■ The applicant excludes the highest revenue uses of retail, restaurant, and lodging to estimate taxes. ■ Then they reach out to a CPA firm, that simply confirms the tax rate. Note this tax rate will potentially fluctuate by 2020 anyway, which immediately devalues the true scope of the accountants. ■ Finally, they write a preface that asserts that the accounting firm was engaged to actually "compare" the three scenarios. ■ This sleight of hand tactic is disrespectful to the public process and the County's voting representatives. Are they aware that Roanoke County's planning commission is made up of two professionals that have received the highest honors in their respective fields and three principals of highly respected construction companies in the valley? Non -arms -length Letter's of Support ■ Neighboring land owner letters represent the same controlling member as the seller of the subject parcel. Furthermore, are all the Cando owners properly represented by the letter from South peak Residences, LLC? ■ The nearby supporter Carter Bank & Trust holds multiple loans for related entities to the seller, including a note on the portion of South Peak owned by South Peak Residences, LLC. Market Study by Self Storage 101 & Letter from Virginia Varsity Transfer & Self Storage concerning supply and demand ■ The company conducting the market study is well-known and qualified. However, the scope of this preliminary investigation is not adequate for the subject market's current environment, as evidenced by the following; ■ The market analyst disregards the Virginia Varsity Self Storage — Starkey expansion, which was easily discovered at the time of the report via online planning documents. ■ This oversight requires the addition of approximately 50,000 square feet (SF) of supply. ■ The Kmart Conversion completed by Phoenix Partners, LLC (which I am the manager of), has the ability to produce 76,000 SF vs. 68,000 as reported. ■ This oversight adds approximately 8,000 of supply to the analysis. Inexplicably, the analyst does not acknowledge the heavily publicized planned Cherney project along the same corridor exactly 3 -miles north, which is currently in the permitting and demo phase. ■ This oversight requires the addition of 72,000 square feet to their analysis. These oversights add approximately 130,000 square feet of supply to the reflected figure within the Market Study. Since the Market Study report, the announcement of another major project has taken place. As stated in VVT&SS's letter, the Graves Humphreys project will inject 83,000 square feet of storage space. While in the preliminary stages of development, the property is zoned 1-1 and storage is a by -right use in Roanoke City under this zoning. file:IIIC:lUserslsmccoylAppDatal..L,ocallTemp/XPgrpwisel5C587018PO2 DOMAINM-Z P... 2/5/2019 Page 3 of 4 ■ Considering both unrecognized and recently announced developments in the designated market area, a total_adjustment of 210,000 square feet is appropriate. ■ Corresponding this imminent supply with the Market Study's two unmet demand indications of 158,412 and 117,797 square feet, it is clear that the market will be oversupplied with the current pipeline of 210,000 SF. ■ Therefore, an adjusted supply of 498,350 SF (reported 288,350 SF + additional 210,000 SF), or 9.60 SF per capita, is indicated. ■ If approved and constructed the subject would boost supply within the designated market area to 573,350 SF (498,350 SF + 75,000 SF). This would catapult the square footage of storage space per capita to 11.04, which is higher than the Highest MSA per capita level (as specified on page 38 of the market study). Taxation and SupplylDemand Relationship The applicant's tax projection schedule fails to recognize the negative effects of a drastic market oversupply. * These negative effects would place downward pressures on the subject assessment, the immediate market area, and potentially self storage assessments within the entire municipality (due to Virginia's equity requirements). ■ The attached table shows the effects on absorption due to omitting the planned supply from the analyst's projections. As shown, based on the analyst's conclusions, an additional 7.93 years would be anticipated based on the market's current population level. This is in addition to the 36 -month period asserted. ■ Considering this likely extended lease up period, the subject property would have an excellent basis to lower their assessment. • Based on the attached table, a vacancy rate increase of 34% is reasonably projected. At a corresponding occupancy rate of 66%, most facilities would struggle to breakeven after standard industry debt levels. • Increased vacancy of this magnitude will result in drastic rental rate decreases and ultimately decreases in fair market value for all self storage properties in the immediate market area. ■ Starting with the Rent -A -Space self storage location, which is literally located at the bottom of the subject's driveway, each of the county's southern self storage locations will likely have a basis to dispute their assessment due to market oversupply. These decreases in assessment would largely offset the revenue gains claimed in the applicant's tax revenue projections and should be considered in the commission's decision-making. While the application's issues are specific to this developer and this point in time, it is undeniable that the site is not ideal for self storage. If it was ideal, why did I develop the raw Plantation Road site or why is Virginia Varsity Self Storage pursuing the complex Graves Humphreys site instead of the subject pad -ready site? Perhaps we did not want to be the developer that started the Reimagine 419 development era off with a structure that directly deviates from the proposed plan. Joseph C. Thompson, MAI, CCIM Thompson Valuation & Consulting, Inc. 133 Kirk Avenue SW Roanoke, VA 24011 file:/1/C:/Users/smccoy/AppData/L,ocal/Temp/XPgrpwise/5C587018PO2_DOMAINM-Z P... 2/5/2019 Page 4 of 4 540.491.9988 Phone 540.354.8653 Cell www.thornpsonvc.com WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted sou rce. file:///C:/Users/smccoy/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwlse/5C587018PO2_DOMAINM-Z_P... 2/5/2019 Effects of Omitted Supply on Absorption Timeline Item Source Omitted Supply VVT&SS Letter (Adjusted) 210,000 Equilibrium Occupancy SS101 - Page 4 x 85% SF to Occupy 178,500 Average Unit Size SS101 - Page 4S % 108 Estimated Number of Units 1,653 Net Absorbtion per Month See below calculation % 17.38 Additional Months required to Absorb Omitted Supply 95.12 Additional Years required to Absorb Omitted Supply 7.93 Item Source Subject Rentable Area SS101 - Page 42 75,000 Stabilized Occupancy S5101 - Page 46 x 90% SF to Occupy 67,500 Average Unit Size SS101 - Page 42 % 107.91 Estimated Number of Units 626 Absorbtion Period - Months SS101 - Page 39 z 36 Net Units Absorber! per Month 17.38 Projected Vacancy Rate Resulting from Oversupply Item Source Unmet Demand Indications Avg. SS101 - Page 38 Omitted Supply VVT&SS Letter (Adjusted) Subject Additional Supply SS101 - Page 42 Market Oversupply Market Study Supply SS101 - Page 38 Unmet Demand Indications Avg. SS101 - Page 38 Indicated Market Study Demand Addional Vacancy Resutling from Market Oversupply (138,105) + 210,000 + 75,000 146,896 288,350 138,105 426,455 34%1 4, '"'tr"�-i�j ( `- • ;inn:. "�' Telephone: (502) 855-5560 Email; lnum.liooii tr tcxasroadhouse.cnm VIA EMAIL TO: wbowercr roanokecountyya.g_ov; n]ahoiie roartokeeoulit va. ov; thenderson tr.mlhcontraetint, com; rejatnese,roanokecountyva, ; jwoltz cr,roanokecountwa.gov February 5, 2019 Planning Commission County of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Venture Storage Group, LLC Special Use Permit Application for the property adjoining the Texas Roadhouse restaurant Dear Commissioners: Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC owns the land its restaurant occupies in Roanoke County and shares a parking lot with the proposed South Peak Self Storage building you are considering. We only recently learned of this proposal, and while we continue to educate ourselves on it, there are several initial concerns we want to share. First, this use is inconsistent with the planned development in the South Peak project that led us to choose this location. It was anticipated that there would be a complimentary retail use next door sharing our parking lot. Given the success our restaurant has enjoyed at this high -visibility location, we are confident a retail use would do well on this site. The enclosed Reciprocal Easement Agreement established shared parking rights for both our parcels, It is our understanding the proposed site development includes fencing off this property which would eliminate any potential shared parking on the McNeil tract which was part of our negotiations. The multi -story building maxes out the site and does not appear to take steps to mitigate the impacts of the proposed use with buffering, landscaping, separate entrances, etc. We are particularly concerned about the retaining wall which has already had structural problems including; the development of a large hole spewing water. We have concerns about our guests driving up the hill facing large Uhaul trucks and other commercial -sized vehicles coming down in the opposite direction on the steep and curvy road. Large commercial trucks will cause additional wear and tear on the road and would increase the likelihood of car accidents especially when there is ice or snow. 6040 Dutchmans Lane * Louisville, KY 40205 February 5, 2019 Page12 Finally, there is only One 4iocess drive to and kom our restaurant which would be sigiffloantly, impacted by the additional wear acid tear camed by the coma ercialksired vehicles, Based on the proposed plaza, our guests, ecnployec s and vendors would share this aocess with these vehicles wh1ob will increase the possibility of accidents. R �hrds, Laura lig Hoon, Senior paralegal Cc; Jim 1{arruggio Sean Renfroa �qoov\"l VMGIMA L"u REcoRD Conit SuraT FORK A — COMM SMUT CONTENT 'nxftvM0nt Meg ........... ...... NumterofParcatal I ClW M (:oRnlY ...... ................. . . .......... — ....... TAX k=MPW VlRQMWMMMl,LAW Grantor. ....... amutne: ............................. ........... . .......... Conelderadva. ._ .............. ........ 1.9j4q_ RMUDH Debt _-.40. Q ................. Actmil vione/Amumed .................... ..................... arWnW Iftinapat . ... . .........................M 4 q ........... MrMarlmtValua Incwanuet "Dwalu IMM Numbof; .......... Cdchud Pne Mumbein Prior Rewrdma At$ I I Cloy M Coubty orwual flocniment Nornber- .......... ....... ...... .......................... Perceaftm Ilm This litorIffillctluktj SUSINItas/NAM ... D46maton DQGfanlbDr. TMAR ............... ........................ ........ ............. ............. VQQJ-antM !jlp!!�g.!�IRLDINQS LUU GMkilbftX ........................ . ........................... ........... ... .... ........... 9EIRFq L66 ........... GRANTEKADOYJ= ................. ....... ----------------- —11-1-1 ....... --1 .......... r .......... 1111 Name; TPA" ROAPHOUS(EHOLDINCOLLC AddmsssAMRRgtp . ......... . ....... ...................................... ............. ­ ........ .... — ............... ...................... .......... ......_-1..........11....1 ..-- ........ .................... .......................... ........... sqata, -XV ... ZIP"N't ...... jiRgq§� 11MOgNumban .......... Pfte Nu -ben .......... PW"l Mend lk"flan Up-bow O%Njl Mn MALIN91-99R2 Tax map ShvlrtpFGper4yv*Wdpd0lkr ............... 1.11 . ......... Ll ................ . ... ...... .................... 111_......1_ - ............ Cft'LrM--SftvpMyA.Ww.- _Iii;56 ML ............ .. .. r,jjy..R0AMCHCE ............................ .................... ...........1111_ ......I._............. ...................... — ..... ..... -1.1 ........................... --- 0104tat zip cede: _ ....... --MR .......... hUMWM*lttPFihP?krV4S3F4 JWAROARII novordins pad up f!kR4RT.MJpFJlE 0AN TITLE INS co ............................ Addmxi jtp"TqlRW.,surTE 106 ........................... . cttS 41161M ALLEN ............. .......... 210cmte. COPYE19" 0=14 OMMOMO Eaeoptivt SegeiwYr Sup-*- Cb -t OWW)c All dabimund. ViRGiNiA LAND RaconD CovaaSumr Vom C — AwmoNAL Maws lWarument Date . ....... ...... butrument Types Number ojrftvmlsr Igumberefragess, C I CJW DO CODAY ....... — .......... --AQM.QwAQvtM ........ 11-1 ........ — PARMA 1K)ZN i iFICATION OR TAx MAP Pdar ftecordlngAb f ]City DI County .... tMAIMM-1 .............. ---- ....... Perfto"a In "is jurisdiCtION6 XW*k Nut twn .......... rx" Numbers .......... Imunsue"t Number: ...... RRIPWRI ...... Parcel Idonaftmao" Numbor (Piro, Tax Mall Number: ........... Short Property Uffiscriptloms...................... .................... CurreatilreperWAddressuJiigiiWP' ... MK^"I%"�,",..,','�",,.-,,,",'.,,.,.."",.."--.-------,------,.-"�".,-.-..-,,..---."-.-,-.-,-""""".-,-.-"-,."..',."..,-"",.",,.,.-". Mr. MANJOW ...................................................................... State:..,VA.... ZIPCode: Prior nownwing An [ ] City 4 County ..................................R Q.K9 ......... ............. — ... — r*MQu1zp lu Tblefuriudledou: . .............. Jam ............. lWok Number: .......... pa"W"Whert ............. Parcel 10161011cottlon Number (PIM- M-A-4-144,00AM" Toxmop rummer: ....... short Irropeny Dexcriptlen. ......... . .. ...... .... . . ............... —'­."'.'-- ........... --.— ........ ................ Mmoa F"perty 44d;MSS: 0J$4XM, MAKAL ............. -- ------- ........... ....... — ........ ............... CAWt R9AM.QK19 ............... ............ —YA— ZIP Codav ............ FORM CC -1570 item 10/14 EM 2 of a CovarSheet c 09-1921-22% 17.1421.1. 17.1-249 GbvYrWw'D2014 Oftoo0thaftewtive M=vfmy. Supr&meCavrtofVlrg1PW. All h0tamarved. VIRGINIA LAND Rzc=D COVER 501SUT FORM C — ADITKOKAL PARCM lWarwnent Date......... IMQ12qilj InstrumeNtI)qVI .........642........ NumberarPorcabc I I City DQ County ......................... . 99AWIMAQW-4-TY ......................... PARCRUS IDS"FOCATION On TAX MAP Pylar lkecordft Au [ I City W county ......................... ....... 0PAKOW ............ . .................. PSN=nfte In "an lUrbdl4Aj6M ftGkNwnk*n .......... Insumment Numben ...... M. ftmel lawlimcu4jeft Number (Pjm)t IP 'T1,30- .R%tl ft,Qt.pjA;j Tnlx "up ftart Property Domiptloal j,"APBU.N.: ........................... Cstrmnt PmpiprW AOdff*wz chr- RPAIROM ....................•........................ ..ft90. ,,.VA,-, ZAP Code: ........ ........... MorltecurillagAtil lCity Dia Caunty ROMONT.. ........... L ................ PerceTRaW to This jurladWan; ............ _199% .............. Iwok NUWI*r- .— Page Number; ......... Ppmd FdontIlIzatlan: Number (PIN): Tam Map Number: . .......... .... . . ................ . —.1— .................. . ........................ - ................ ........... ...................... ................................................................ * ................. ....... CamentPropoetyAd4rosm .... QW., ....................... .......... ............ .......... FORM CC -1570 Rev., it} 14 ---RqSp 3 of 3 Cover Sheet C SS 174-223,174-227.1.17.1-249 Capyr4jlK*20140fAca Oftht RWMUW S=mbixy. 9uPT6lIV*CaUVt0rVlr0nLx. All righUrazerve& PG 00M PM JAN 13 1003 -W. o �r RE[.".fC]►%X o REQUESTED AND AVMfR RECORDING RETMN 0* Tox.as Roadhouse Holdings LLC 6040 UNAchmans. Lana LoWavdlle, Kantu&)r 40205 Attention: Legal. Dopo*ncnt Pardon of Tax Fatmels: 077.20-01-15.01-0000 077.20-01-17.0+ 00ua 077.20.01-14.00-000O 077.20-01-11.W0000 077-20-01-22.00.0000 RECIPROCAL EASEM[ENT A.+GRRFMXNT 'chis RECIPROCAL EASWMENT AGREEMENT (the "AammenO is moAv this day of_0L&A ► ; 21115 by and betWo m MCNEH, PROPERTIES. LLC, a irS_W, limited liability compam,y with a corrpomte address of 4423 Pheasant Ridge (toad, Suite 901, Roanoke, 'Virginia 24014 (havinafter collecdvaly referred to as ..ter_ cMi17) tond TEXAS ROADHOUSE HOLDWOS LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company with a corporato addraw of 6040 Dutaduarnns Lane, Suite 200, Louisville, Kentucky 40205 {dteme>irsat r coll*CdVesly referred to as "ZQgdhoU" WI NESARTH WMRE.A►S, McNeil isthe owner ofthat cattaia tract or parcel of land sibmw in the 1iRoanoke County, Virginia which tmct is rnarc particularly des ibed on Wall-tA" attuohrd haM and made a part havof by this ref mm, and is identified as the "'McNeil 'haat"' on the site plan attached hereto as Exhlblt nix` ," (tho ",its . ZW) and nude a tract hereof by thin rafexmcm; and WHFtRRAS. Roadhouse is tiro owner of that certain tract of land situated in fire fi d, RoanokV COunty, Virginia which tract is more particularly described on fthihk= attached howeW and made~ it pact bercof'by this reafec+ance+, and is identified as the "Roadhouse 7,wt'' an the Situ flan; and W*IEREA% the McNeil Tract and the Roadhouse Tract era contiguous and adjacent to each other as disown on the Sita PInst and the McNeil Ttnot and the Roadhouse Tract are sometimes reftred to herein WividuOly as a "Tract[" and togother as the "Tracts'; and PG M 'iii JAN 13 iOlM 'liV)URE ". McNeil and Roadhouse desire to impose curtain easementa upon the Tracts for the mutual and reciprocal benefit of tho McNeil. "bract and the Roadhouse T3raat as wore partioulady act forth below. Wlll REAS, the parties intend to record ord this donumentt eontomporaneously with the transfer of the Roadhouso Tract to Texas Roadhouser Holdings, LLC. NOW Till[IfAURlP't~ RE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agregt ants hereinagerset forth, McNeil wW Roadhouse,hambyr Want, covenant and ag= as follows: 1. Aums Etmm-g t , gubjcwt to • any exprrsa conditions, limitations or reswvations contained heraixt, the following nonexclusive peupowel, aownn easowents are hereby created; (a) An easement for the benefit of and as an appurtenance to the Roadhouav Troot for aeccaas, ingress and egrew over. upon, through and across the. clrivowaysr, aacessways, carbouts and sidewalks located froom time to tinxuc on the McNeil Tract, so as to pravido Ibr the pawage of mots r velticles and pedestrians between the MoNvil 'pct and the Roadhouse Tract, Roadhouse shall not be allowed to use the McNeil Traot for heavy trtYitr or equipment trali'ic (except in conaeation with the initial installation of certain site improvements) without the pricer written consent of McNeil, not to be umea sonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. (b) An easement for the, benefit of and as an opportmanoe to the McNeil Tract for access, ingress and egress over, upon, through and aoww the driv awaM acumsways, ctirbouls and sidewalks located fluor time to Limo on the ltoadhousa Tract, so as to provide for the passage of motes vabicle n and pedestrians between O%o McNeil Tinct and Roadhouse Tract. McNeil shall not be allowed to use the Roadhouse Tract for heavy truck or equipment traiffica without the prior written consent of Texas Roadlwuse, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 2. Parlri g Baawmeanrattsr, gubjcct to any express conditions, limitations or reservations contained herein, t o "Lowing nonexcluslvc pexpotum parkJag emements are hereby cr=ted: (a) An casement for the benefit of and as an appsutawrice to the ltoadhome9 T &Ot for 1paxidng over, upon and aeross the parr armee located front time to time on the McNeil Traces. (b) .Au eamment for the benefit ofand as an appurtenance to the McNeil Tract for paxkWS over, upon wW across the parking arr m lovatod from time to tomo out the Roadhouse Trm.-t, rLmIpffumA Ossaw* Agmam..d Pad" % Wlam) - Xv"gFeak (FINAL)[D0x) PG '15 JAN 13 W*3 3. T;Allity EnsaMeri,a. S*aot to My Opross conditions, limitatiomw or reacrvations contained heauin, tho ilretlowing nonexclusive perpotuatl utility casements are hereby created; (sa) An crus*ment i'or the benefit of and as an axppurtenanvo to the Roadhouse '1'x80 over, upon, under and through the McNeil Tract for the installation, use, maintonan", repair and repiar. errant. of vnderground Futility lines, conduits and facilities to servay the Roadhouse Tract and the impxovane nts thercot4 togenher with the right to tier into and connect to utility (including storm water drainage and detention) llnes, conduits and facilities now or hexeafter located on the McNeil ' Vaet in order to aiw v the Roadhouse Tract and the improvements thermn; provided, however, the location of such lines, conduits and twilities an the WN4 Tract shall be subject to the appmvaal of the owntw of taxa McNeil Troot and aitch not interrfow with improve m6nts or operation tIx m f. which approval 9WI not be unreasonably witltheld, conditioned or delayed. if the owner of then Roadhouse Tract dosiress to a xerciae its easement rights heroin, it shall first sabmit the plans showing the location of tkta proposal utility line or f ility to the owner of the McNeil Tract f br their rcviesw and approval, whish approval vbAU oot be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delaayod. The owner of the lwlesN011 Tract shall rid with its ntWwvai or disapproval within thirty (30) days oll reMpet of such planes and will specify witb. roaasortableo partioularity any resaaftm for disapproval. Failure to oto respond shall be dearne i approval of the proposed plans (provided the owner of thea RRioadhousso Tract has act forth in its request for approval that the owner of the, McNeil 'lraWs IkUnre to respond withln ddrty (30) days shall be doomed McNesil'ss Mroval thereto). The owners of the TWU will coopwate with one another to agree upon the location of any such utility line or fragility, . (b) An o wmaent f0r the benetit of and as an appurtenance to the McNeil Tract over, up6n, utador and throe& the Rtser %v u sc Tract ror the installation, use, maintexa nnoe, repair and replacement of undorgrotmd futility line, conduits end faculties to sWVO the McNeil Tract and the improvesrnents thereon, together with the right to tier into and connect to utility (including storm water drainage and detention) lines, conduits and facilities now or hereafter located on the Roadhouse Tract in order to serve they MoNeeg Treat and they improvements thercow, provided. however, the location of such lines, conduits and fhollities on the Roadhouse Tract shall, be subject to the approval of flea owner of the Roadhouso Tract Pmd shall not interAm with improvements or operation thereof, which approval eahnll not be unreasonably wltl}held, conditioned or delayed. It the owner of the McNctl Tract desires to exercise its etammasaxt rights hsa -An, it shall first :submit the plaits showing the loasaation of the proposed utility linen or ffaeaility to the owner -of the Roadhouse Tract Ibr their review and approval. which approval shell not be uqreasonably withhold, conditioned or dolayeMd. T m owner of the Roadhome Tract shall respond witlx its approval or eltsapproval within thirty (30) days of'r 1pt of such plans and will specify with reasonable partioula ity any reasons for disapproval, Failure to no respond shall be domed approved of tiro proposed plans (provldoil the owner of the McNeil Tract brae set forth in its requc*t for approval that the owner of the Roadhouse MairM041 UUMMA,AWee­PatIAftOI a5ee IDSeinem) -s ax tKNALa (CQ7) PG 00% '.16 JAN 13 1603 Tract's failure to respond within thirty (30) days shall be deemed Roadhouse's approval thereto). The awn cm of the 'Tracts will aaoperate With 640 another to agree upon the location of any such utility line or faallity. 4. Otorm IKqi1n= Ensernenis. "Cat to any express conditions, limitations or roservations contained herein, the (olla.ving a t exclusivo parpoNal storm drainage easements arra hereby orated: (a) An cut =ent for the beaelit of and as as appurtwmee to the Roadhouse. Tract Jbr storm drainage over, upon, under and across the McNeil Tract for the discharge of storm and surAwA water drainage firosm the Roadhouse Tract. (b) An emement for the benefit of and as an appurtenance to the McNeil Tract for storm drainage over, upon, under and across the Roadhouse 'Tract for the discharge of storm and sortwo water dra pe *om they McNell Tract. S. Conistruction of Shared Parkhun. T (a) . McNeil hemby &mats Roadhouse the right to construct up to (109) parking spaoes together with the ila sary cunbingand xeluted impravemento (the "hared Par dug Facilities") upon the MaN&I Tract in the area identified on the Site Plan as the "Shared P'ec'king Area" on the Site Plan in the event M*Neil has failed to construct such facilities as of the later to oc4aw of (i) Jatxaaay 15, 2016 and (ii) at least seventy five (75) days prior to the acheduled opening chat* of Roft",ausc'e businous an the Roadhouse Tract. The Shared Packing Facilities alual las inn"adiately available for use by llcadhotasv upon completion of the same pursuant to its rights under Section 2(a) hereof; (b) Subject to any express conditions. lirnitations or reservations contained herein, McNeil hereby declares, a dablishes and ,grants for Ow benefit of, and as an appurtenance to, the Roadhouse Tract an rascment and right to enter upon the McNeil 'i:raat far the purpose of conshvcttng and installing the {Sheared Parking Facilities within the: Shad Porking Area (the Tlm **instruction easement granted under this Section S(b) aball expire on tho earlier of (i) twenty tour (24) nwnft from the r000rding of this Agrmuent in the public rewrds of Roanoke Counter, Virginia or (fi) the date the Initial P addng Work on the McNeil Tract to completed. (a) The Initial Parking Work shall be (i) performed +at they sole oast and expetm of Roadhouse, (ii) perforrnesd in a good and workmanlike fmanutrrr, and (iii) perrlim ed in accordance with the Conatruotion Plants (as hereinafter defined) ppprovod by the McNeil in accordance with Swtion 5(d) Wow and in c*nxplianco with any and all applicable laws, codes, regulations and oxilinaruom. Roadhouse, at its soles cost and K-h—A tA,g---t (A— Fwmug u"I tt") - Sm*Owk (MAL) (Qtl2) PG 00? 116 JAN 13 i0w oapense, shall be rosponnible for obtaining all ,governmaantal approvals amd pas vita for the pesrformaaswo oft>he Initial Parking Work, (o) At least dtiurty (30) clays prior to data Roadhouses intends to commence the construction of the Initial Parking Work, Roadhouse slxall deliver to MaNcil final plans smd specifioatioaus At the initial Parkins Work (the "len '") for MdNeil's review and acpproval (such approval not to be unreasonably rwitltlae ld, coriditioacd or delayod). Tito owner of the McNeil lUct shall respond with its approval or disapproval within d9rty (30) days of receipt of the Construction Plans and will sppaoifi with reeawonable partlaulaarity any reasons for disapproval. Faailum to so respond shall be dcaned approval of the Gansttaation Plms (provided the owner of the Roadhouse Tmot has set forth in its request Aw apparovarl that the owiter of the McNO 'I is ifhilure to respond within thirty (30) days shall be doomed McNeil's approval thareto), (d) Prior to any entry by Raadhouse or any of Roadhouse's contriwteyrs, ttubcontmeatora, llcaaaseeeo, invitees, ogmto or employees onto the McNeil Tract its connection with the performance of the Initial Parking Work, Roadhouse shall deliver to MoNall a O rtifloate of Insurance evidencing the existence of a policy of coxaamerciai general liability Insurance c o wring all adtivitiva of RmObo ue or tiny of Roadbomse's contractors, subcontractors, lioomeees, invitees, agents or employeads witbin the 8hsred Parking Area ;and/or an the McNeil T -Mut, with a single limit of liability (parr ora naTence and aggmgate) of not lees than eine Million and 00/1401 Dollars .(S 1,000,ODO.00) and nraming McNeil as an additiozial insured. (ra) Roadhouse shall ioddzrarrify, defend and hold McNeil and its invitees, permitter and licenwes each bornxlerss frons and against any and all claims, dowaands, damages, liabilities, costs, expensw and Beans (including, without Ift9tation, reasonable attorney's fees) arising *vt of the initial Parking Work perfonned by or oft behalf of Roadhouse within tho Shared FaarkiAg Area, aadlor on the McNeil Tract, excluding any morias, dema*ls, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses which r+eaarlt from the gross neglipmoo or willful m#scoradvot of McNeil and/or contractors, subcontractors, licensees, invitees, agents or employees. a� (a) Roactouse and WNW hmvby agnea that the McNeal Tract xray be used for any retail or xMWMItut use inclxWW8, 'without llrnitation, a fall -service restaurant, a quick-savlo o rosauraant, a fwtefaod restammat and/or a fast-caasual restaurant; provided, however, that unleea the, owner of the }/roadhouse Tract consents in writing„ which cc notmt may bo gr4nted or withheld in Its sole discretion, no portion of the McNeil Tract shall iso leaea 1, sold, occupier/, used or aperxW by any party for any of the ftr rllo ins um (i) C W37s Raar and Oill, (H) a C7hearVw's Restaurant, (in) a full service rnstaumnt pFftnadly tatml% steals or nibs, or ibr the advertisement of any such restaurant, (iv) any restaurant aontair"S more than 200. oftts, (v) the sada, distrlbution or display of any drug Randa MOd HUMON Aer=Umt (Acoria VMkWg UtIN0ee) - Sou" (FWAL) (uarx) PG OM 16 JAN D tO*3 paraphernalia prittparily itt the use or lar mtlon► of illicit drugs; (vi) an adult type bookstore or other establishment selling, renting, displaying or exhibiting pornographic or obsotme materials (Including without limitation magazines, boats, movies, vldeov, or ph0tograpl0) or providing Mali typo entertainment or aotivid egs (Including, without limitation, any displays or activities of a variety involvit%, exhibiting or depicting sexual thmues, audity or lewd acts) and the maks, reratttl, other exchanso or exhibition of any sc►XttRlly explicit materials; and/pr (vii) any (other purposes probibited by law. The f womolug mstriodons droll bo cic+emed perpetual covenants running with the land react bines upon McNaK stead Its snccessom and 00Wgna. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the McNall Tract may contain a rco4 rraaat exceeding the 200 scut linaitartion upon they expmams condition that the owner of thq McNeil Treat constructs of sito parking capacity wltidn an area itnnnediately adjacent to the Roadhouso Tract or lb oNeil 'lit in an amount equal to one P4TWAS space (mooting the nidatr mn dintetsrsioanm required under applicable laws, rLdos, m4inauces or regulations) fbr every two additional seats added over the 200 seat liienitation at*Wd. above. (b) Rrnadhouser and MoNeil hereby ageve ftt their respective Tracts "I be dove loped in aooa uco with tim %too Phar aitaohed hereto as Exhibit .fir' and that in no event shall any imp>r+overneotst C+omtructvd by orither party on its respoctivo 'Vraa taaatexially deviate fi+nm then Site ]Plata without the prior written consent of the other party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Notwithstanding the forgoing, this provision shall not obliagato tho Bailor to obtain the Buyer's perrWssion to deviate from the Site Plant to the extent that the Site Plan applies to that portion of the McNeil Tract outside of tho Shad Parking Area. (a) Notwithstanding any other,prowision ref this Agreamoa to the Co ntrr y, the raotdotions set #bash in this Section. b shall lapse and be of no fU rther rbroo and armt if Roadhouse bas not opened a Texas Roadhouse restaurant on the Roadhouse Tract fbr at lent oae; (1) day within twenty four (24) months of tho recording of this Agreement in the ,public ftcOrds Of Roanoke County, nr if i'i,llaw#rg such opening. Roadlxause or Roadhouses stioCemom tied assigns ceases to opera" a fW1_60rvir„e ra*t4munt an the Roadhouse Tract fbr a period excooding cighteen. (IS) consecudve months for any reason other ton it v4wualty. condmm atom forces majoure or repair or renovation of boar Roadhouse pact or any impr+avetneats thewupon, 7. M , tenancefidEVVair. The= owner or eadx 7Yact shall maintain, repair and replace ((r calam to be amintniuned. rsapalux! and ftplaswA) all utility faviliti®s, driveways, cmfi cuts, tv odways and parking opacs loaned an its respootive Traot at its stilet cost and oxpenw, so as to keep such areas at all tinxcs in a wafer, sightly, good and functional condition to standards of comparable community pity rretaR space in the metropolitan Roanoke market area, anti in c+arnpiiUMO with All appllcablo govsrenmenial laws, rules, rogulartimm, mdow, and ottlinancto tMomising jtariadiction there aver as well as with the pro atoms of this reach—i tloue 1 A9rwmmt (A0GM Fw t 2 UdUda * - aioalrLSpak (MAL) (002) PG M 116 JAN D 10*4 ,Agream eat, NotwltitNtanding the foregoing, until suph date as development boa corrrtnwood upon the MoNoll Tract (the `d'liriscg Date"), the owner of the: Roadhouse Tract shall maintain the Shared Parking Facilities in good condition and repair. From and after the TASSor Date. the: owner of the McNeil Tract and the owner of the Roadhouse Tract shall sham responsibility for tnaintaining, repairing and replacing the Shared Parking Facilities. Tia owner of Roadhoaser Tract shall be responsible for 561/1e of said costs and the owner of the McNeil Tract shall be responsible for 44% of the maintat ante, repair And replacement c+sattl. Repairs, tualatononce and retplaca xre nt will be pedormed whets both the owners of tbv Roadhouse 'brant and the McNeil Trot sisal) so woo in writing. but either patty shall have the right to require retsurfuoing of tho driveway rase+rxtout emery ton years ftom the anniversary diato of the Trigger Date: by giving a written notice to the other at any time within six month iirom said annxvesrstuy data. (a) In the event of a b inch try eithew party hereto of any of the terms or provisions hereof; the non-dufiaaslting party dull bat ontitlod forthwith to full and adequate relief by injunction and/or ail" oogh other available legal and equitable renn"es from the con%qumces of such breach. including payment of any amounts chit, and/or upeciflo pxfntmancse. (b) In addition to all other remedies available at law or in equity, ppm the f4ure of a desfsulting pasty to caro a breach of this Agreement within thirty (30) clays fallowing written notice thereof from the non-def4ulting party (unless, with respect to any such breach the natwv of which cmuiot rcoonably be cared within such thirty (30) dais period, the deslhulting party e�(a+ot><lmam► s such cure within ouch thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes such oxo to completion). the non-dc+t` ting party shall have the right to perfimm. such obligation contained in this Agrecxnent on behalf of the def skim$ patty and be reimbursed by suvh defaulting party upon demand for the reanonublo costs thereof together with a fiftem-perocnt (15%) admiulstradve fee, which atwk derow%d shall include rens rxsabler suppoTdng docsuogrtmtation evidencing the cost of the same. In the event a dsferiAVu* party shall JWJ to wake such rahubmse meat payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice fiam the noxi -d e+fuurlting party, shah. non - defaulting party shall be entitled to place a Iien upon the +dei3attttirtg party's tract W the; manner provided statutorily for mechanics liens. Notwifttamling the foxegaln,g to the contrary, if the nature of flus breach of this Aga trent presents an inunediate ride of damage to prup+ettN irdury to persona, interruption of utility service or loss, obstruction or blockage of a0cow, the prior notice ragdrerneut of this paragmph shall not apply, and the non -defaulting patty "I he authorized to taloa immediate steps to minimize or elixjiv ate such ride, and be wimburse d for the s ortable tracts tit of as aforesaid. In such crvedt, notioe of ouch action. ethall be given to the datkulting party as some as reasonably practicable undt r the virpw ttstances. Raoit b"l want Aammew (Ame Pnkt+e VOUWtO • ' k (MNAL)1002) PG 0060 1116 JAH 13 t0104 (o) Tho romrdies Vwified herein shall be cumulative and in addition to all other n me dles, pernsitte d at laver or in equity, 9.Ar�utual find ��an. 111%gh party shall de&nd, fi%d ify and 1101t3 hamlen the Outer party for damages or liability to persona or property that Inight arise at any time duving the construction. operation, or maintenautce of either Tract or rmm the use of any Tmot by aalther puny, its texmnts, employees, Invitws, suppliers or anyone else using aidw Treem fvr ingress =4 OWM to and tiram the McNeal Tract or Roadhouse Tract, furless such damage or liability is a result of the gross nagliigmee or wiUrul misnonduct of the other parry, Haoh party further agrees that it will at all times during the duration of Oft ensetnimt maintain and pay for Commemial Oesneral LWIlity l;nsurcfuco ailbrtliing prsvtoution to the other party, and naming the other panty as an additional Insured on the policy or policies, fpr ,a 00mbinod limit of liability of not leas than T'wo Million ]Dollars ($2,00,000.00) for each owwrame. Each party further Agrees upon request tea doliveoe- tau site Other party a c.+tr ficateo(sa) ftm an inffovw+* company or c omportie5s satisfactory to tho other party evidencing t)he existence of sac: iriatrreuwe vvitlr the anter party namcd as an additional ianaaurc:d on such crsrtlxlesute(s). Nrrhdthst ling anything to the e.ontrary contaiued in this Section„ provided that the siert worth of oiffivr ,patty exceeds One Hundred iNillfoa Dollam (1+100,000,000.00), such patty shall have the right to seif insure as to all liability risks havin out forth. 10. Liem In the event any Ynecharria's lio" is filed against the Tract of one party as a result of zff v"CQv pearfea W*d or materials flrrnished fdr the utim of anotbear party, tho party Permitting or 'U6 11% such lien to be sea tiled agrees to cause nuch lien to be di3ubwSx d 'within thirty (30) days artd tiutho agmels to i ade mnK6 defend, protect and hold Intrude ss the other patty and its Tract against any cmd all liability, loss, damagej, costs or a xp oases (including reaKwable attorneys, fees and casts of etedt) on He on of sue h claim of tion. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice of such liens. the party permitting or causing Such liva. to be filed agrees to cause such liars to be relftsed and dimbarged of record, either by payieg the indebtedness which grave rise to snub lieu at by palestina bored or other seeftrlty as ahnll be roquiread by law to obtain such release and discharges. Nothing heroin shrill prrevont a party permitting or Causing such lien fin n ccutesting the validity the:rcof In any a:traurrn" such Party Choose & so Ions as such lien is discharged as aforesaid- 11- N992QL Every notice, approval, cnnsesnt, or other commUnicertiew authorized or required by thio A,grocimant shall not be effav6ve Unless the warts shall be in writing and dslivef0d (i) in person, (ii) by coudcr, (iii) by reputable overnight uourier guaranteeing newt busies day delivery, (iv) if sent on a busloos clay during tho business hours of 9:00 a.m. until 7:00 pm. Eastern Standard Thee, via tvla: opi+ar with A rely to follow by reput4blu overnight courier guaranteeing next business day dvliveae9. or (v) aeaut Postpae prepaid by United States certified snail, return roccipt roquost(;d, directed to the aappropriate party at its addxom provided below, or auch other addmss as a party way doslgnarto by notice given f vin tree to AMO in acoordaance with this Section 10. Such notices or atbix 001nA10111esatipns shall be Wective (i) in the aaaso Orpe onal delivery or Ieaclpuv A EMQ*W4.AWVCW ut (Aiaoen Parkins XM ) ,- aq (MAL) (aDZ) PG W61 '16 JAN 13 1004 courier desliv" on thv dates of delivery to the party to whom such notice is addressed as evicleneod by a written recaaipt sighed on bab elf of such party, (ii) if by owe>rfflght courier, one (1) business clay after the dMosit thereof with ull delivery charges prepaid, (iii) if by telecopier, on the date of treltnuohmion, provided that such tolecopier transmession Is sent on a business day during the hours stated above, and provided that a confirmation sheet Is reocived and a copy of the notice is slenultaneously dsiliven d by reputable overnight courier (with 011 charges "aid) for receipt on the next bausineas cUy, and (iv) in the ewe: of cortifiaed mail, the corrlier of the, date recclpt is adcnowltaiged an the rotura a evaipt for sued h notica or fines ($) bussioess days alter the date of posting by the United States Post Office- "Cha notice addyropsw far Roadhouse and McNeil are as follows; Roadhouse: TIYX" ROADHOUSE HOLDINGS LLC Atim, Legal Departmesnt 6W Dutdmans Lane. Suite 200 Louisville, Kentucky 40205 Telephone: (St' 2) 515-7244 Famimile ., (502) 4261-3274 Email; t�sstal�`Sa tarraRraadhc►el��,cc?� McNeil: MCNEIL PROPERT S, LLC 4423 Pheas xlt Rldgc Road, Suite 301 Roanoke, Virgh;ia 24014 Attention., Hunter Smith Tolvph one: (540) 774-7762 Pa alwilc: (540) 772-6470 Email: m,�mMithpackett.com 12. 90vVWnsr L*W, The laws of &a State in which the Tracts are located shall govern the ifratc�rprettstioeY, validity, perl'acmance, #ud enforcement ofd ds Agmentent. 13. 0uarn99 of Uwnershio. In the savant either koadbousv or MuNeil convoys title to or ground leases the Roadhouso T not or the McNeil Tract act to ,anothor party. dither pwty sball notify the other party within thirty (30) days thweathser (althoogb *111ure to sand such notice shall not be considered a deffiult wader this Agreement). Roadhouse or McNeil, as tho case ranay br, sial] be provided the ana ine, address, and telephone number of suss tratnNfarec. 14. �a The rights and sabligatiorna contained herein shall u+un with the tlt1" to the McNeil Tract and the Roadhouse 'T'ar ct and a ball bind and inure to the benefit of the respective ssunc omors and assigns of'the partios hereto. Redym al ea.wment Agccomw (Acam POW09; Wildw) - Sots" (MAL) (401) PG 0062 "16 JAN 13 10,04 IS- BAMiv DOW This Agrtartent shall become affective upon tho diner larst written above. 16. Rei oc�afift McNeil and Rpadhausc reserve the right to relocatt or modify the eurbeauts, parking spars, dnvaways and acccasways on their respective 'Tracts, provided neither party may relocato or-rnodify the curbouts between the Tracts without the prior written approval of the other party, not tq be mWeasonsbly withheld, conditioned or delayed. 17. jzleadinga. The hexa Huss of the paragraphs contaita®cl herein are intended for reference purposes only and ,shall not be used to interpret the agreements exrrrtalne d herein or the rights granted hereby. 18. Elcu1_Dal= nays. Mf the final elate of any period falls upon. a Sat►rrduy, Sumu r, or holiday recognized by the US Postal Smvice, then in auch ovexnt the time of such period shall be extended to the neat stay which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday rcco,gnized by the US Postal Service. Wherever in this document the word "days" is used, it shall be considered calendar clays and not "business days'. 151. entire Ac"Wng ut. This document contains the entire agmcement betw n McNeil and Roaedhouse, and there are no other terms, Oonditiono, promises, undorrttakings, statrnemtam or rwresentations, express or implied, conamift the Matters contemplated by this doaerrrte:nt. The parties agrce that the provisions of this Agrseo nemt may be modified or amended, in whole or in part, or tterrntinated, only by the written consent of the owners of'tho WNW ']Tact and the Roadhowe Tract. evidenced by a docurnont that has been ,fully executed and a dbiowle dge d by such ovniers and recorded in they public records of Roanoke County. Virt"glnia. 20. M011 Q Anlr Mort~ affecting any portion of a Tract shall at all times be subject and subordhiste to the toms of this Agreement, except to the extent wgmssly otherwise provided herein, artcl any party forealosing any such mortgage, or aoquhing title by deed in lieu or foreclosure shall acquire title subject to all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement. nt. 21. lwTon-Dtrliaation. Nothing contained in this Aammnmt shall bo doomcd to be a gift or dedication of any portion of any Tract to the general pu'biio or fort any publio use or PwPerse WhOW06vor, it lreaho$ the intention of the parties hereto and their snccmtiors and a SW= thwt n,othiM in this A80comolt. expressed or implied, dWI confer -upon any pcn0n, other then the parties lteretO and their sue sora Md Assigns. any rights or remedies dies uoderr or by reason cult this ,Ag rent. Any party hereto further reserves the flght to close off its portion of the roadways located an its `iVact ttrr such reasonable period of time as may be legally nWMW7. in the opinion of aualr party's counsel, to Pmvent the acquisitiOn of Prescriptive nights by wWone. provided however, that prior to closing off' any portion of the roadway, as herein provided, the owner of the Tract neorW*ra r vM.AWeeoncot (A00—rr.e-W UIMTA) - S l'"(rn AL) (002) FG M *16 JM 13 10,04 Containing the roadway to be closed shall give written notice to each other putty of its intattioin to da so, mod shall ;M#Wnpt to coordinate such closing with each other putty alio that no umvmonablo intert4renee in the passage ofpeC3estrlans or vehicles shall ooeur. 22. POYMNI RUDIARS With The rights, agroenuento, duties, obligations and easemwts sot forth in this Agreement shall be de=zed to be covenants rwining with the land, which rights, agreements, clastics, obligations and onsmonts shall Mnain in full farad and *fR*t and be binding upost the owner of each Tract and its strowssors.in�title, The fm ovaracr ofonch `Bract maty grata the benefit of any easement oontainod herein to the tv"Ilts mats other oaDOpunts of the, Tracts for the duration of sudh occupancy, and to the customers, =pla>yoeo, awmts and business Invlteos thereof, but stwh grant is rtat intended nor shall it be aanarned as W-04ting any rights in or for the benefit of the genexnl public nor shall it affect any real pmupesrty outside of the Tracts. Further, flys pm -visions of this Agreement shall remaln In O foaat p apatually w the extent permitted by taw. Not,wiftUm ding any other pmvislon of Oda Agreement to the contrary, the casements fjrtantcd herein rogy be utilized by floe owneft and/or occupants of the koatdhouse 'I owt and We 11+lsaNeril `iyraot, as the case may ba, and their respective hxmnts, employw% Agents, conhuctorrs, owtomars, invitees. and tta ewes ,). ('Sign WrM Commence an the Follow;ng Pugej Radp=M ft,Emmi A etna (Amm Ywfriap uliaidaa) • ' Slc (FItYAL.) (4t12) fG 0064 '16 JfiN 13 14=44 IN "WITNESS WHERnoF, MoNeil and Roadhouse have executed tlgs instnunent as of the clay and year lural above written. MCN1 IL PROPBRTITS, LLC a Virginiq 11ited liability company By. NMn0; S K. 3 f'w Title: STATE OP § COUNTY OF i4rroi4 This ins ��tnf acknowl�ecdged Wor�a me on this day of .i .^e - 2Q l S, byfe i +M i`ltlraw10 Of MON61 Properties, LLC, as Virginia limited 1lftbilitycompany, for and on bels tof'said limited liability company. h �— Notary Public Signature (MRSONALI,ZEi SEAL) fftnatures Continued ors Following Pogo) P ON 81 �trtim NW1"AtaYPU Lf r�nwa�lkli v14�rgin d I�Inn lK78C7RppQ � � RuotproW Rmemput Ap�wusestt ( A 1PNIMne Utilift) - tCkft[G-t•2'013] PG OM 'JG AN 13 10,04 f Slgna tures Continued /burn Previous Page] TrXAS ROADHOUSE HOLDINGS LLC a Kentucky limitod liability company By, Teams Roadhouse, Ina., its Managa w COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY § COUNTY OF 11111FE R.SOriN § This instrucnetxt waa acimowtodged beforo me on this 00%oy 2015, by 5.- �1 i Yr d. of Texas R.oadhvuset Inc., a Dolawave corporation and tiro Mansger of Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC. a Kentuolty X liability company, on behalf ofmild Limited liability company. Notary fxbfic Signattlyd (PERSONALIZED SLxAL) Mamn t'i:'wn Nofty a) # 454= NQUO POW, St* at UtW, KV My aommirfaion unpins NO 14. �Y atooiRweul HlYisstmtt w namrnt (Mcees pmr4einrt IJ3iNtl - 5inr ;to& (111HAL) EXfHnIT •°A.. L130AL D13SCRIPTION OF MCNEIL TRACT BEGINNING AT CORNED. A, SAID POINT BEING THE NORT14EASTERL'Y' CORNER Ole N�EW PARCEL ,B-1, PROPERTY Ola TEXAS ROADHOUSE HOLDIN08 LLC, PER PLAT SHOWIN0 THS COM131WATION AND SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY OF WOODCLIFF INVESTMI NTS, LLC AND MCNEIL PROPE]tTISS. LLC„ PREPARED BY LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. DATED DECETBE1lt 145.2Q]5 .AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT 0201512495; SAID POINT ALSO LOCATED ON 11M SOUTHERLY LITE OF SOLYM P13AK BLVO., A 50' ACCESS & UTILITY EAS13MEN'T AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #201213435; THENCE LEAVING NEW PARCEL B-1 AND WITH SOUTH PEAK BLVD., FOR THE FOLLOWING 7 COURSES: WITH A. CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH SAID CURVE IS DEFII RD BY DELTA ANGLE OF 220 09' 54", A RAfSIUS OP 253.001, AN ARC LENGTH OF 97.87', A CHORD OF 97.26' AND BEARING S 600 37'41" 13, TO CORNER I3; THENCE WrM A CURVE TO THE RIGHTp WHICH SAID CURV13 IS DEFINED BY DELTA ANGLE OF 19" 42'32"9. A RADIUS OF $63.00', AN ARC LENGTH OF 296.65', A CHORD OF 295.39' AND BEARING S 39" 41'217'E, TO CORNER, C; TIMNCE WITH A CURVE TO THE RICHT, WHICH SAID CURVU IS DEFINED BY DELTA ANGLE OF 14" 52,32"* A. RADIUS OF 443.00', AN ARC LENGTH OF 120.20'. A C13C pto OF 119.87' AND BEAR1No S 220 23'54" E, TO CORNER, D; THENCE WITH A. CURVE TO THE 1:101 -IT, WHICH SAID CUR'V'E IS DFXINED BY DELTA, ANGLE 920 15' 03", A RADIUS OF 1113.00', 14 IG 0067 ' 16 ,SAM 13 10,04 AN ARC' LENGTH OF 165.$4,' A CHORD OF 14M0' AND BEARING S 310 09'55'- W. 9'5S"W, TO CORNER E; THENCE WlrM A CURVE TO Tim Yt]ONT, 'WHICH SAID CURVE 1S DEFINED BY DELTA ANGLE OF 620 38'32", A. RAMUS OF 95.00', AN ,ARC LENGTH OF 103.87', A CHORD OF 96.77' AND REAR]NG Iii' 710 23'21" W. TO CORNER F,,TI CE IVB 40* 04' 10" W. 135.09' TO CORNER Q, THENCE WITH A CURV8 TO THE LEFT. WHICH 5A11D CURVE IS DEFINED 13Y DELTA ANGLE OF 260 26'21 ", A, RADIUS OF 325.00'. AN ARC LENGTH OF 149.47', A CHORD OF 1411.64' AND EBARINNG N 53" 17' 19" W, TO CORNER X. SAID POINT BEING TIME SOUTHEASTERLY CORMR .OF NEW PARCEL 8-I. THENCE LEAVING SOUTH PEAK BLVD.. AND WITH TRE EASTERLY LINE OF NEW PARCEL 13-1, N I I" 14'42" 17., 294.80'TO CORNER A, TRH PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTA MNO 106,757 SQUARE FEET, BEING 2.4967 ACRES. i6- PG wis JAI to ION RXHIBI'1"B" LROAL DESCRIPTION OF ROADHOUSE TRACT NEW PARCUL B-1, consisting of 1.2714 aures, shown on s plat titled "PLAT S140WING THE CSiMB NATION AND ST,J.l DrVISION OF TAX #077.20-01-14.00 PROPERTY OF WOODCLXVF INVESTMENTS, LLC INSTRUMENT 020 03 1 275 3 CREA77NO 14E"ON NEW PARCEL 1A-1 1.0798 A.C. (47,036 S.F.) ANI) TAX #077.20.61-11.00 (PAlt.CSL 13) TAX 077.20-01.15.01, TAX #077.20-01.-17.00 AND TAX #077,20-01-22,00 PROPERTY OF MCNEIL PROPEP,=S, LLC INSTRUMENT #200316394 CREAT1NO H ;WON XEW PARCEL B-1 1.2714 AC. (53,380 S.P.), TRACT I 0.14$I AC, (6,365 S.F.), TRACT 2 1.1297 AC. (49,212 S,F.), & TRACT 3 2.467a AC. (107,495 S.F.) SITUATED ALONG EL13CTRIC RD" FRANYLIN ROAD & SOUTH PEAK I3LV13. CAVE SPRING MAGIST IAL 1NSTIOCT R.OANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA," datod December 16, 2015, prepared by ,Lumsden Associates, P.C., and recordod on December 21, 2015 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke Virginia as Iustrument # 201512495. Together with and Subjeact to all rights and Obligations, including without limitation uuy and all ease oats and rights of way, in favor of or imposod upon such roal estate. Ther PTOPearty is pssrt of a RPcci4l taxing district (tho "CDA. District") rolated to tiers South pear Community Dovolop went Authority (the "CDAs'). The CDA wtw created by action of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 24, 2010, Ju order to help finance portions of tho public infrustructum serving the CDA District. In addition tion to custonnary teal estate lexcs, the above-described Proporty may be -subject to an awtual special assessment related to the CIA (the "Special A essmezW% The SPOCIal Assessment orrery tats prepaid In its entirety and the obligation to pair Special Assesssnwnts for the Property p nnanantly satisfied. Thu total potential arnnwnt of the Special Asscsstuent applicable to the Property at this th ne is $698,6.10.00. The total potential annual amount of tho Special Assessment applicable to the PMPeny at thio time is $31,419. The CDA's aclmint-stmtor is 1V wl fleasta, dna., 896.5 Guilford Road, Suite- 210, Columbia„ NW 211; telephone (443) 539-4101. As long as the Property is subject to an outstanding Special Assessment, the Property is subject to the requirement (and, by accepting and recording this deed, Cirentree covenants and age s) that all subsequent deeds conveying the Property shall include a disclos= statement that shell include a statomean of the amount of the applicable Portion of the Special Assessment and satking forth the rnM0 sated address cif the CDA's administrator or athear location where infomration regarding the CDA and The Special Assessment may be obtaintrd. in EN STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Venture Storage Group, LLC Request: To obtain a Special Use Permit for a mini -warehouse storage facility on 3.10 acres zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District Location: Near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard Magisterial District: Cave Spring Suggested Conditions 1. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled for Special Use Permit South Peak Self Storage Venture Storage Group, LLC Concept Site Plan (if recommending prepared by Mattern & Craig, dated November 6, 2018 subject approval): to special use permit conditions and those changes which may be required by Roanoke County during the site plan review process. 2. The building shall be developed in general conformance to the architectural renderings titled South Peak Self Storage prepared by McMillan Pazdan Smith Architecture, submitted with the application. 3. Landscaping shall be provided for the front, sides and rear walls of the building. The size of the landscaped area shall be twenty (20) percent of the square footage of each wall fagade of the building. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of large and small evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover. 4. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Venture Storage Group, LLC is requesting a special use permit to construct an approximately 105,000 square foot building for mini -warehouse use on three parcels, totaling 3.10 -acres, zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial district, located near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard, adjacent to the Texas Roadhouse restaurant in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Commercial uses, including the proposed mini-warehouse/indoor self -storage use, are consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. When reviewing a special use permit adverse impacts shall be considered as well as the design, scale, use and operation of any proposed use and how well the proposed use conforms to the County's Comprehensive Plan as well as the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Mini -warehouse is not a permitted use in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial, Zoning District, but is allowed as a special use. Section 30-19 of the County's Zoning Ordinance outlines the standards and process for the review of special use permits. The C-2 Zoning District standards and Section 30-19 are attached to the staff report. Article IV of the County's Zoning Ordinance includes use and design standards for various uses including mini -warehouse The use and design standards for mini -warehouse are listed below. Sec. 30-85-19. Mini -warehouse. (A) General standards: The minimum lot size shall be two (2) acres. 2. The minimum front yard setback shall be thirty-five (35) feet. 3. No security fencing, security gate or other obstruction to vehicle access shall be permitted in the required front yard setback or in any buffer yard required pursuant to Section 30-92 4. All interior driveways shall be at least twenty-six (26) feet wide when cubicles open onto one (1) side only and at least thirty (30) feet wide when cubicles open onto both sides to accommodate loading and unloading at individual cubicles. Adequate turning radiuses shall be provided, where appropriate, for a thirty-foot long single unit truck or moving van. Materials and design shall otherwise conform to the standards contained in section 30-91-4.3, parking area surface standards. 5. No door openings for any cubicle shall be constructed facing any residentially zoned property. 6. The following uses shall be prohibited: Auctions by tenants, commercial wholesale or retail sales, or miscellaneous or garage sales. The servicing, repair or fabrication of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, appliances or other similar equipment. C. The operation of power tools, spray -painting equipment, table saws, lathes, compressors, welding equipment, kilns, or other similar equipment. The establishment of a transfer and storage business. The storage of flammable, highly combustible, explosive or hazardous materials shall be prohibited. 7. Outdoor storage areas shall be used for the storage of motor vehicles, trailers, and recreational vehicles only. All outdoor storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties by a ten -foot landscaped area consisting of small evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs in accordance with Section 30-92. 8. Accommodations for a live-in manager shall be permitted. Site plan review and building plan review will be required if the special use permit is approved. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background on South Peak Development — In 2004, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors rezoned approximately 30 acres of the South Peak Development (then called Slate Hill) from C -2C, R-3, and C-1 to C -2C. As part of the rezoning, there were a set of proffers that addressed uses, slopes, buildings, roads, access, ridgeline, utilities, retaining walls, landscaping, site lighting, signage, parking and stormwater 2 management. Also included with the application was a set of exhibits showing the general road and development pattern for South Peak (Ordinance 062204-11 and exhibits attached). In 2010, Roanoke County formed the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA) to assist in financing the infrastructure, improvements and services in connection with the development of the land into a mixed-use development proposed to include commercial, retail and residential component. In 2012, the South Peak Condominium Project and Estates at South Peak rezoning was approved, In 2014, construction was completed for the South Peak Hilton Garden Inn. This property is zoned C -2C and was subject to the 2004 proffers. In 2016, the construction of the Texas Roadhouse restaurant was completed. There are three separate parcels included as part of this special use permit request. All of the parcels are currently owned by McNeil Properties, LLC with Venture Storage Group, LLC, as the contract purchaser. The properties were not part of the 2004 rezoning request but are adjacent to those properties and are part of the same overall development. Until this project request, staff is unaware of any development plans associated with South Peak that have included a mini-warehouse/indoor self -storage use. Topography/Vegetation — Over the years a system of walls has been constructed at the South Peak Development and the overall site has been graded. The site for this proposal is currently flat and contains a parking area that was constructed with the Texas Roadhouse restaurant. There is little to no existing vegetation. Surrounding Neighborhood — The surrounding zoning of the subject parcels include C-2, High Intensity Commercial, zoning, and C -2C, High Intensity Commercial with conditions. Surrounding uses include restaurant, office and commercial uses along Electric Road, and adjacent restaurant (Texas Roadhouse restaurant with a shared parking area), hotel (Hilton Garden Inn), and vacant uses within the South Peak Development. US 220 borders the properties to the northeast. The South Peak Development sits at a very prominent, visible, and strategic location at the intersection of Route 419 (Electric Road) and US 220 — two of the highest traffic volumes in the Roanoke Valley. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture — The submitted concept plan shows a three story building approximately 105,000 square feet in size. Approximately 695 units are proposed within the building along with an office/support area. Units will range in size from 5' x 5' to 10' x 20'. The facility will have a leasing office open during typical business hours (Monday through Friday: 9:30 AM — 6:00 PM, Saturday: 8:30 AM — 5:00 PM and Sunday: 11:00 AM — 3:00 PM). Residential customers will have 24 hour access. No on-site manager apartment is proposed at this time. Architectural renderings of the proposed building are included in the application. The building meets the front yard setback of 35 feet from the property line, which is located in the middle of South Peak Boulevard. In addition to the building, the submitted concept plan shows 5 parking spaces for customers, attached building signage, landscaping and dumpster location. Security fencing is not proposed at this time. The entire site and building will be monitored with security cameras. There are a total of 171 existing parking spaces on the Texas Roadhouse restaurant parcel and the subject properties part of the special use permit application. 65 parking spaces are located on the Texas Roadhouse parcel and 106 parking spaces are located on this proposed development. A shared parking agreement allows 43 parking spaces to be used with the restaurant use. Access/Traffic Circulation — The existing shared entrance will be utilized as shown on the concept plan. No additional access points are proposed. Tax Projections/Market Study: Information on tax projections for three scenarios (vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) is included in the application. A self -storage desktop market study for this site is attached to the staff report. Agency Comments: The following agencies had comments on this application: Building Safety: 'The construction will need to meet all the requirements of the current Uniform Statewide Building Code.' Solid Waste: "No impact on Solid Waste as their volume of trash will exceed the limit imposed by the ordinance and they will have to acquire a private dumpster." Fire & Rescue: 'The Fire and Rescue Department does not object to this project, but it would be subjected to access and fire flow requirements during the site plan review process". Economic Development: 'The following comments are from the Economic Development Department and do not represent the position or opinions of the South Peak EDA: Economic Development does not support the special use permit request. This project is inconsistent with the Pro forma submitted for the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA) that was specifically created in 2010 "to assist in financing the infrastructure, improvements and services in connection with the development of the land into a mixed-use development proposed to include commercial, retail and residential components known as South Peak that will benefit the citizens of the County by promoting increased employment opportunities, strengthening the economic base and increasing tax revenues, and will meet the increased demands placed on the County as a result of the development." Further, the proposed project in inconsistent with the original development plan for South Peak that included: • 90 unit Hilton Garden Inn Hotel • Approximately 38,000 square feet of Class A office space • A residential condominium project consisting of approximately 120 units • Approximately 23,000 square feet of restaurant space • Approximately 100,000 square feet of retail space" VDOT: "We have reviewed the above mentioned special use request. The Department has no comments on this request. The proposal appears to be of a similar or less intense use as those planned for this development. It appears from the information provided that the development of a self -storage facility on this property will not adversely impact the VDOT right-of-way more than originally proposed. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the parcel or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting." Western Virginia Water Authority: Due to the length of the Western Virginia Water Authority comments, they are attached to the staff report for review. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The County's Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also E be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Suitable land use types include general retail shops, personal services, office and institutional uses, and limited industrial uses. Commercial uses, including the proposed mini -warehouse, are consistent with the Core future land use designation. In 2016, the County hired and worked with Stantec to develop an area plan for the area along Route 419 from Route 220 to just past Starkey Road. The planning effort included an extensive public outreach and involvement process. After several revisions to the initial plan document, the revised draft 419 Town Center Plan has been scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission for March 5, 2019. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Venture Storage Group LLC is requesting a special use permit to construct an approximately 105,000 square foot building for mini -warehouse use on three parcels, totaling 3.10 -acres, zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial district, adjacent to the Texas Roadhouse restaurant in the South Peak Development. Commercial uses, including the proposed mini -warehouse, are consistent with the Core future land use designation. When reviewing a special use permit adverse impacts shall be considered as well as the design, scale, use and operation of any proposed use and how well the proposed use conforms to the County's Comprehensive Plan as well as the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. If recommending approval of the proposed project, suggested special use permit conditions that deal with general conformance to the concept plan and architectural renderings, additional landscaping, and dumpster enclosure screening should be considered. CASE NUMBER: 1-112018 PREPARED BY: Rebecca James 1 Philip Thompson HEARING DATES: PC: 215119 BOS: 2126119 ATTACHMENTS: Application Aerial Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Photo Renderings (Prepared by Staff) Ordinance 062204-11 Self -Storage Desktop Market Study WVWA Comments Zoning Ordinance Sections C-2 Zoning District Regulations Sec. 30-19 Special Use Permits Sec. 30-3 Purpose Core Future Land Use Description Photographs Public Comments County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 el4z -1 �c) a� t,6 For Staff Use Only Date received: r Received by: Application fee: PC/BZAdate: Placards issued: Bos date: Case Number 9 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning XSpecial Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal 11 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 336-667-8000 ext 114 Venture Storgae Group LLC Work: PO Box 1303 Cell #: 336-981-7126 Wilkesboro, NC 28697 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: 540-774-7762 Ext. 136 McNeil Properties LLC Work: 4423 Pheasant Ridge Rd SW, Suite 301 Fax No. #: Roanoke VA 24014 Property Location Magisterial District: Cave Spring 0 South Peak Blvd, Roanoke Va, 24018 Community Planning area: Cave Spring Tax Map No.: 077.20-01-21.00-0000,077.20-01-22.00-0000, Existing Zoning: C2 077.20-01-24.00-0000 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 3.10 Existing Land Use: Vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15 2-2232} REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/WICP) Proposed Zoning: Zoning shall remain C2 with a special use permit for Mini -Warehouse Proposed Land Use: 105,000 sq ft, 3 stories, climate control self storage Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No' IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No I I IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No I 1 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of 'Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RISIIV/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP VIAA RIS/1V/CP VIAA X Consultation & 1/2" x 1 I" concept plait Application fee X Application Metes and bounds ascription Proffers, if appli X Justification Water and sewer pplication X Adjoining propel 1 hereby certify that 1 am either the owner of the property or the wr is agent or contract purchaser and am acting witl consent f the owner. Owner's 5 �RECEl Q iowledge and 'Nov 082018 z Q 2 J ry I) JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Venture Storage Group LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and ,justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare, Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classi fication in the Zoning Ordinance. This request furthers the purpose of the Roanoke County Ordinance by creating a needed service facility that does not negatively impact traffic, utility services or the surrounding properties, will look like the existing community look of the other South Peak Properties as shown on the elevations provided, while increasing the county's tax base. The request ties into the C2 Zoning district purpose by providing a needed service of climate control self storage in a high traffic area that can serve the surrounding communities. This proposed development will also work well with the surrounding neighbors as it is a low traffic generating service that can coexist well with the Texas Roadhouse neighboring property. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The project conforms to the general guidelines of the Roanoke County Community Plan by incorporating design characteristics, stone base and EIFS colors, that tie into the existing properties of South Peak. This land use is also compatible with the surrounding Restaurant, Hotel, and Apartments properties and should be of very little impact to them. The proposed structure's look will be in harmony with the surrounding properties and preserve South Peak's current aesthetic. This special use permit will also achieve goals of the community plan by (i) increasing commercial development by developing an unimproved parcel that has been vacant for 5 years (ii) meets a need for the community and helps diversify the businesses at South Peak (iii) provides a business that is less volatile than retail or restaurant industries and is more sustainable (iv) promotes economic growth (construction, jobs) and keeps Roanoke County healthy, clean, and beautiful!! Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public set -vices and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The impact on the property will be that it will take it from a vacant lot to a 3 story 105,000 square foot climate controlled self storage facility. The peak hours for a self -storage facility are different than the adjacent Texas Roadhouse restaurant, so it should not impact their use of the shared parking lot and will not negatively impact traffic in the area.This use should not impact the adjoining properties as all the other prominent properties, the Hotel and Restaurant, will still be highly visible. The only Item which will be less visible is the retaining wall. Climate Control Self Storage is a minimal user in that it does not use alot of utilities, it is not a high traffic count generator, it is a fully sprinkled building so impacts on the Fire Department should be minimal but it does provide a service that is currently needed for this area of Roanoke. In addition to this Climate Control Self Storage adds a level of security to the surrounding area, given they have constant surveillance and they are typically well -lit. JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. if additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The variance will not be ora substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. 3. Evidence supporting claim: 4 JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: 2, Evidence supporting claire: CONCEPT PIAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level ofdetail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: AI,L APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development _X_ b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names ol'owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X g. All property lines and easements X h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development X j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required far REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS X k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers N/A m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals N/A n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants NIA p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed N/A q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. flzzf Signature of applicant 11/6z/lf` Date i1N49xV5111!f= 3xORYM 'e r+,s,v� Yett-S:t 10x5 ai NVId 3115 1d33NO3 ewzn'�o •nox breY� � wa}tEL1( 371 'axoaa 39Yxojs 3xrsrr3n ,7R P , E d 3 M 3136 Wad woos ��a�a$� �saa��� �asu�s� • v� } s_ Sa g�+ ` a J ~ ,. C) AS ob 4 g� ate?�o w Y IS 31 a ' d / I• �4 1 �e�� a O� 0 1\44.•A ` ,gyp, ; .sr � sC +� 1 1 i �' ,f � ��► OCT 1001, is pill 1' ., \ '\ / / ,ice i / f -•- ��`', � ° , ����•,< a �.. ��:, 1�1 � ,lit• i,'� ��'� .i� � i �% i i Y'j!I 7 4� d♦ �� � C l- � C ro U N E a N 3MO1S J13S NV7ld HInOSCD o h O it w z � - 53UUdONd IHnIN3A IUD 5 a € s U n a- a- i IMF X33 =9 � g N C - YA.3raWaY sge Eau 3OV801S J13SWid HInOS r, d r U } CD ah - 9 - �,'1 J ' S31it13d9tid 3NfIfN3A .41 r a U 0— f e IF1 # i IMF gY � sge ah - - I� z o -:. w � 1ey -mom I q f I gi t a, — i IMF Mims, § o -:. w � 1ey -mom Community Development 0 Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and MOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/450, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date. April 79, 2000 7 p, ANpk F Community Development Planning & Zoning Division A Y3 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 99, 2005 I.V a`A b,,LCn Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature Q el/1�-1 Date LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR VENTURE STORAGE GROUP, LLC SOUTH PEAK SELF STORAGE FACILITY BEGINNING AT CORNER L, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF NEW TRACT 3, PROPERTY OF MCNEIL PROPERTIES, LLC, PER PLAT SHOWING THE COMBINATION AND SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY OF WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC AND MCNEIL PROPERTIES, LLC, PREPARED BY LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. DATED DECEMBER 16, 2015 AS RECORDED 1N INSTRUMENT NUMBER 201512495; THENCE N 50° 22'43" E 6.26 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF SOUTH PEAK BLVD.; A 50 FOOT ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 201213435; THENCE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SOUTH PEAK BLVD., THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 21'58'52", A RADIUS OF 278.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 106.65 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S 60° 32' 11" E 106.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 19° 42' 30", A RADIUS OF 888.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 305.45 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S 39° 41'30" E 303.95 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 140 52'33", A RADIUS OF 488.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 126.70 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S 22° 23,59" E 126.34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 92" 15' 19", A RADIUS OF 128.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 206.10 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S 310 09'57" W 184.55 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 620 38'36", A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 131.20 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF N 71° 23' 06" W 124.76 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 40° 04' 10" W 135.09 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 250 23' 57", A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 13299 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF N 52° 46'09" W 131.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE LEAVING THE CENTER LINE OF SOUTHPEAK BLVD. N I V 14'42" E 340.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 3.133 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. r'- V E N T U R E STOPAGE G R O U P South Pear Blvd Adjoining Property Owners SOUTH PEAK HOTEL LLC Tax Map #: 077.20-01-55.00-0000 4500 SOUTH PEAK BLVD 4423 PHEASANT RIDGE RD STE 301 ROANOKE VA 24014 TEXAS ROADHOUSE HOLDINGS LLC Tax Map #: 077.20-01-11.00-0000 4435 SOUTH PEAK BLVD 6040 DUTCHMAM LN LOUISVILLE KY 40205 MCNEIL PROPERTIES LLC Tax Map #:077.20-01-17.00-0000 4423 PHEASANT RIDGE RD SW SUITE 301 ROANOKE VA 24014 SOUTH PEAK HOTEL RE LLC Tax Map #:077.20-01-55.01-0000 4423 PHEASANT RIDGE RD STE 301 ROANOKE VA 24014 Venture Storage Group, LLC I P.O. Box 1303, Wilkesboro, NC 28697 1336.667.8000 V E N T U R E STOPAGE G R O U P Special Use Permit South Peak Blvd Additional Tax Information Venture Storage Group has contracted with Foti, Flynn, Lowen Co. to come up with the attached Tax Projections Study. Based upon our research in contacting several retailers and restaurants we have found that the realistic next best use, besides Climate Controlled Self Storage, would be a 10,000 square foot office, or medical office or bank. In the attached Tax Projection Schedule we have ask Foti, Flynn, Lowen Co. to compare the South Peak Land as staying vacant, as a Climate Controlled Self Storage Facility, and as a 10,000 square foot office, or medical office or bank. As you can see by the Projection Schedule on a tax collection basis using the South Peak land for Climate Controlled Self storage would be the best use of this property by allowing the county to collect approximately $72,267 per year in taxes versus $24,539 if it stays vacant land or $45,367 if it were to be a 10,000 square foot office, or medical office or bank. Venture Storage Group, LLC I P.O. Box 1303, Wilkesboro, NC 28697 1336.667.8000 VENTURE STORAGE GROUP, LLC -ROANOKE COUNTY, VA REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS LICENSE 2020 TAX PROJECTIONS SCHEDULE W or foti,Flynn, Lowen&Co. Colculoted solutions. To the Members of Venture Storage Group, LLC 126 Executive Drive, Suite 200 Wilkesboro, NC 28697 David B. Lowen, CPA Frank B. Hancock, CPA, CVA Bradley J. Davis, CPA R. Ethan Cook, CPA David P. Booth, CPA William R. Brumfield, Jr., CPA - Retired We have examined the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (ix._ vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Roanoke County, VA Real Estate and Business License Tax Projections ("Tax Projections"). The member - managers of Venture Storage Group's are responsible for ensuring that the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections are in accordance with the tax code of Roanoke County, VA. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections are in accordance with the tax code of Roanoke County, VA, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. We note that the tax projection scenarios within the attached schedule of Tax Projections include actual and estimated tax assessed values of properties and estimated gross receipts of businesses. These actual and estimated values and estimated receipts are not within the scope of this examination and we have not provided an opinion on them in our examination report. We note that the properties and/or businesses of the tax projection scenarios within the attached schedule of Tax Projections may also be subject to other Roanoke County, VA taxes, such as personal property tax, vehicle license tax, tangible business personal property tax, machinery and tools tax, water tax, gas tax, and electric tax; however, these taxes were not in the scope of your schedule of Tax Projections. A firm of CPAs and Financial Consultants (540) 344-9246 Fax: (540) 344-9264 501 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Post Office Box 12765, Roanoke, Virginia 24028-2765 http://www.fFlc.com AN INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF JBDO ALLIANCE USA We note that the tax rates used in the schedule of Tax Projections are the enacted 2018 tax rates; however, the schedule of Tax Projections is for the year 2020. Actual enacted tax rates in 2020 may be different from the 2018 enacted tax rates used in the schedule of Tax Projections. In our opinion, the Roanoke County, VA real estate and business license tax rates and calculations used in the real estate and business license tax projections for the three scenarios (i.e. vacant lot, storage facility, and office building) of calendar year 2020 as shown in the attached schedule of Tax Projections are presented in accordance with the tax code of Roanoke County, VA, in all material respects. Roanoke, Virginia November 16, 2018 W IGIs O O T3 w O b0A Z O 4 �^' o O N O Cd O vi C � U }+ cC O -G O O o Y Q U W N W ccs W 0 U s. U G U os r.•+ Y cd O c o 0 y y y O > O y0 s., U O v� N• O N r:, �Z3 N p y N .O N X O v bA "O O N 69 toS O O s. o U cd Q) o 69 O ai ��•' i0cu O y ++ c r. O -y0y U c� Ocd V y N p 00 ,N 3 ii 70+ y Q s^ ❑ 0 O O p, U U o ti d �cd+ fr" U N-cU-i cd V V O U Q o = O w �, —,M m o O y O U y cXC s. y N O N U NO w��, N >' �_ U '•�••� ❑ —O O ♦+ U o «i O Cd O cUC 00 Q r U W 'A O y O U U c0 0 .O 'O i. O Q. +d it aU.. o c0 zO �",f. +�•' N 4. Q N N U � Y W bq N y p Fa Q 0 sc0, O � En2 O O ti N O z H H Q �–+ E"{ �--i 69 00 OM N 0 O X id H, n 4 O> O -p N N 00 v~i N -0 y lc 00 � N 0 Q 110 O W Q Q a 69 69 69 OIn y O EN N N z-�� o00 w �� z o w V rs, o00 W IGIs O O T3 w O b0A Z O 4 �^' o O N O Cd O vi C � U }+ cC O -G O O o Y Q U X � � O W 0 U s. U G U os r.•+ Y w y O c o 0 y y y O > O y0 s., U O v� N• O N r:, �Z3 N p y N .O N X O v bA "O O N U ate+ O O s. o U cd Q) o o O ai ��•' i0cu O y ++ c r. O -y0y U c� Ocd V y N p 00 ,N 3 ii 70+ y Q s^ ❑ 0 p, U U o ti d �cd+ fr" U N-cU-i cd V V O U co c W o = O w �, —,M m o .Q o O � . s.. y O U iC C cG 6 % C s. y N U tU O N U NO w��, N >' �_ U '•�••� ❑ —O O ♦+ U o «i O Cd O cUC Q r U W 'A O y O U U c0 0 .O 'O i. O Q. +d it aU.. o c0 zO �",f. +�•' N 4. Q N E 2 U � Y •.O" tp v. bq N y p O Q 0 sc0, O � En2 O O ti N O z H H E" N �–+ E"{ �--i 69 g & 2 'O \ 0 / 00 R 0 \ ~ -C f \ ®J o\ o / o o ^~ \m D \ \\ /// §/\ - U2 >E / 6 ///\0 \; //. 3 -e = 6» /»~ \\\ / Sye^»2 \ \� /�\ \ 0 IV 2 \ / \ C) e ® z /( J( 2 9 ° z--- z/ p U z / z c2 // $22 \/\ \ C) Dana ® d \ « 0.0ICE)) z�U%U u 3 e \ '° » 9 9® g x&&& g = z a a t ^� . > o / y z e c z / \ \ \ 4 2 \ \ \ » 3 > a o � 0) % L N r ' J U � QL Q s J 0 E > N 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 z z (� N (� Q N 00 0 0 U w o —� CO -Q000( CDS W Z 0 ��RGIN�q 0 v> 0 z N N N �Q N= or N - _ QO 0 0 O O O N O C 0� 0 <.: 2 C N O 0) � � N O v X DKK N O ��0 �JNn� LL i O i �OOO Q E0� -4 l+ W. II MAR_ DATED VERIFIAD BY.. &� BY AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2004 ORDINANCE 062204-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A TOTAL OF 29.96 -ACRES LOCATED AT 4485 SUMMIT STREET (TAX MAP NOS.77,20-1-3, 77.20-1-4, 77,20-1-52, 77.20-1-54, 77.20-1-55, PART OF TAX MAP NO. 87.08-3-11) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF C-2 CONDITIONAL, R-3, AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF SLATE HILL I, LLC, SLATE HILL II, LLC, AND WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 2004, and the second reading and public hearing were continued from March 23, 2004, April 27, 2004, May 25, 2004, and June 22, 2004, and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter which was continued from March 2, 2004, and hold on April 6, 2004; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing a total of 29.98 acres, as described herein, and located at 4486 Summit Street (Tax Map Numbers 77-20-1-3, 77.20-1-4, 77.20-1-52, 77.20-1-54, 77.20-1-55, Pari of Tax Map No. 87.08-3-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C -2C, General Commercial District with conditions, R-3, Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, and C-1, Office District to the zoning classification of G-2, General Commercial District with conditions. 2, That this action is taken upon the application of Slate Hill I, LLC, Slate Hill II, 1 LLC, and Woodcliff Investments, LLC, 3_ That a portion of this property was rezoned to C2C by Ordinance 102897-19 at which time the Petitioner proffered the following conditions which are hereby REPEALED. - (1) Petitioner proffers to build the Lowe's store in substantial conformity with the preliminary site plan, dated October 7, 1997. Except that Lowe's will flip the location of the garden center and the truck loading docks to the northern property area of the proposed project. (2) Petitioner proffers that if any out parcel that requires C-2 zoning is proposed on this site or the adjoining site of White House Antiques, it will be subject to a special use permit regardless of the C-2 use proposed. This will allow the Planning Commission and the Beard of Supervisors the opportunity to review traffic impacts, circulation and access issues. (3) Petitioner proffers to retain the existing vegetation between the Petitioner's site and the property of Quail Valley condominiums. The only exception to this will be the removal of vegetation that is necessary for improvements to the access road for the existing residential properties. (4) If any of the residential homes on Washington Road remain, Petitioner proffers to upgrade, pave and maintain Washington Road to provide continuous, adequate and safe access to these houses. This upgrade will be to a standard acceptable to the County and reviewed during the site plan review process. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing conditions attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, Q 2 hereby accepts. 5_ That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 77.20-1-3 — C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-4 -- C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-52 — R3 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-54 — C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-55 — G1 to C2C Portion of Tax Map No. 87.08-3.11 - R3 to C2C The metes and bounds of the above-mentioned parcels are further set out on the attached Exhibit 2. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorizer) by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Wray to adopt the ordinance with revised proffers dated June 22, 2004, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church Wray, Altizer, Flora NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William Driver, Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 3 R� PROFFERS REVISED June 22, 2004 Address of Subject Property: 4486 Surrnnit Street Roanoke, VA 24014 Tax Map No_: 077.20-01-03 077.20-01-04 077.20-01-52 07720-01-54 077.20-01-55 087.08-03-11 Applicant's/Owner's Name: Slate Hill I, LLC Slate Hill 11, LLC Woodcliff Investments, LLC The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with the rezoning request: 1. Uses a. The C-2 uses set faith on the attached Exhibit A would be prohibited. b. Zones shall be as depicted on the plat attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2. Slopes a. A geo-teclunieal report from a certified geo-technical engineer shall be required to verify slope stability and stabilization methods, and design values for retaining structures. b. Slope maintenance escrow/trust account, between Roanoke County and he landowner, in an amount natAoqmcad $100,000, shall be required for a 105' 10 -term, to insure the continued safety and maintenance of all common areas for the Slate Hili development as defined by slopes, retaining walls, and private roads. Buildings a. Height: Building height shall not exceed 50 feet (as measured per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance) unless underground parking is provided. Then building height shall not exceed 65 feet, except in Zone 3 where the height shall not exceed 75 feet for development of a hotel; otherwise, 65 feet, Any building constructed above the base level of 1 335' elevation mark which exceeds the 1385' elevation mark(as measured per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance) will be required to have underground parking. In addition, any building that exceeds 50' in height, regardless of the base elevation will be required to have underground parldng except for the motel, Thus, there are two situations in which underground parking may be required, b. Size: The combined square footage allowed in the Zones 3 and 4 will not exceed 365,000 square feet: please see attached trip generation data (Exhibit D). The 100,000 square foot maximum is the gross area of any building located in Zones 3 and 4. The maximum allowed footprint will not exceed 90,000 square feet_ c. Materials: Acceptable building finishes include brick, wood, vinyl or composite wood substitute, glass, stucco or exterior insulated finish system (E1FS), split -face colored concrete block, stone or cast stone. Structures constructed in Zones 3 and 4 will be similar in appearance, materials and design. d. Roofs: Rooflines of the buildings predonunantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall be articulated. Acceptable roof materials include standing seam metal, copper, composite slate tile or shingles. e. Building Colors: The predominant building colors shall be tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick, natural stone. f. Facades: The facades of buildings predominantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall have vertical plane relief. g. In order to protect the integrity of the Roanoke County water tank, lines, and steep slopes and in order to protect public safety, the developer shall submit an engineering report stating that the November 1:3, 2003 approved grading plan will not adversely impact the County's water tower and related facilities. Any further, grading in Zones 3 and 4 will require the submission and approval of a fully engineered site plan. 4,. Road a, Curbing shall be required throughout the entire road system. The curb and gutter configuration shall be, standard VDOT designs for appropriate conditions. b. The roads shall be in the approximate location as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated January 20, 2004, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit B. J.n the event VDOT does not grant permission to construct a portion of the road on the VDOT property as shown on said plan, the approximate road location shall be as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Pian" dated December 11, 2003, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit C. c. All parking and vehicular circulation surfaces shall have asphalt top. Base and underlayment shall be as determined by recommendations from geo- technical engineer. d, Roadway widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet fiom base of curb to base of curb, Maximum road grade shall be 16%. There shall be, no on -street parking allowed. e, Minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be installed to connect all buildings within Zone 4. 5. Access a. Petitioner shall make all necessary improvements to Electric Road (Route 419), Valley Avenue and Franklin Road (Route 220) as required by the traffic impact study and by VDOT. 6. Ridgeline a. Building height shall not exceed 1384° elevation mark in Zone 3 and 1394' elevation mark in Zone 4, and all building elevations shall be shown on the site plan. 7. Utilities a. All utilities shall be underground from the point of the utility transformer to the interior of the site. b. Where design parameters allow, all utilities shall share a common trench. c. Donate irrinimunz 20 -foot easements to the public for water and sewer to the boundaries of the property upon approval of the final site development pian. 8, Retaining Walls a, Height: Maximum of 15 feet. b. Distance in between walls: Minimum of 4 feet. c, Color and Texture: Tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick, natural stone. Walls shall be textured.. d. Landscaping: One medium sized (5-10 feet @ maturity) slu-ub for every 12 feet of linear wall, Shrubs shall be a mix ofdeciduous and evergreen. Shrubs may be grouped together. Landscaping behind retaining walls shall be as indicated by engineering designs for the walls. e. A Professional Engineer shall design all retaining walls. 9. Landscaping a. Trees shall be planted along the private entrance road every 30 feet, minimum 2 1f2- inch caliper, 50% native species, Flowering species that are street and urban conditions tolerant shall be utilized. 10. Site Lighting a. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 22 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, shall be down -lit or shielded so as not to directly glare onto adjoining streets or properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or properties shall not exceed 0.5 -foot candles. b. All street lighting shall be designed to complement the architecture of the adjacent buildings. 11. Signage a. No more than three (3) business signs shall be permitted for each business. b. Restricted signs; The following signs shall be prohibited: Off -premise signs, portable signs, temporary signs, and changeable copy sighs. c, Signage shall complement the buildings' architectural style. Colors shall be in the range acceptable for buildings. d. All freestanding signs shall be monument type, shall not exceed 10 feet in height or 12 feet in width and signs shall be channel lit, ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or adjoining properties. e, All signs shall be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. f, One monument -type sign shall be allowed on the Route 220 side of the development. The height of the monument sign shall be Iimited to 25 feet. 12, Parking a. No gravel parking areas shall be allowed. All surface parking in excess of Roanolce County standards shall be constructed of materials as recon-nnended by the geo-technical engineer, 13. Storm Water Management a. Outfalls shall be tlnough level spreaders and have a 25 -foot riparian buffer as a separation between the discharge point and the concrete culvert. Other design options may be employed if approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department and VDOT. b. All drainage ways shall be piped or grass swales. No rip -rap or concrete drainage ways shall be permitted. c, Detention Requirements: 10 -year post development equal to or less than 2 -,year pre -development and 25 -year post equal to or less than 2 -year pre - development. Applicant/Owner: SLATE HILL 1, LLC By�'� - Hunter Smith, Manager SLATE HILL 11, LLC By //' Hunter Smith, Manager WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC By Hunter Smith, Manager May 24, 2004 Scale: 1 11=4 k .... .— .1...1 . i..—rn wiz VIM 1 c 15g1c('(1E4` G1 P. 04/07 xhlbit A Slate Hili Proffered -Out Uses kWOLL'A$Y$kUSE RSICBaumgardnertzONINGlSlata MjJj-USES-C2.dvo Mage 10f 2 PERMITTED USES IN [STRICT 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, T ps I �+ Multi -Family Dwelling Two -Family Dwelling 2. Civic Usa� Park and Ride Facility Post Office_, Public POr s and Recreation Areas MIKY Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Done` 4. Commercial Ekes Agricultural Services Bed and Breakfast Boarding House - COPYMD66Ea1Outdoor Entertainment Gasoline Station Pawn Shap Commercial Indoor Sports & Recreation Commerciafi Outdoor Sports & Recreation . 5. Industrial Uses `. Recycling Centers and Statlons 8. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower ` Parkin F;�clliry kWOLL'A$Y$kUSE RSICBaumgardnertzONINGlSlata MjJj-USES-C2.dvo Mage 10f 2 MI 1♦ 1., GYJOH lt:) • JCS u a I CI'Cmu" t PT{ 9 LLHVIHN NH I t 15407740961 P.05/07 Exhibit A Slate Hill Proffered -Out Uses 11JOL LY%Y$%USERS\CBautngardner\ZONINGI$Iate HIII-MRS-02.doo Pago 2 of 2 Special Use Permit - 1. Civic Uses He fvvay Hoarse Religious Assembly Utility Services, Ma car - - 2. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership, Used -. Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash Convenience Store " Dance Hall Equipment Salos 66d Rentals Manufactured Home Sales ` Mini -Warehouse Recreational 11e7hlole Sales and Service Surplus Sales Truck stop 3. Industrial uses Custom Manufacturing__ Landfill, Rubble Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings 11JOL LY%Y$%USERS\CBautngardner\ZONINGI$Iate HIII-MRS-02.doo Pago 2 of 2 § i � '� f+1 1/7— t / � CR. & ] �\ � to V3 / /§ 44 \ / 33 4-6 v o]§ m lb \} � � \ d � / � P' -r Q L 06/,10/04 THU MUZ FAX 540 345 7BUA HATIERN 0 URA1G D touuz I�- 2 W CL 9 e� o c'o ca m in io m T- s a � u m M N v ry N N M Q. Q.r p � al to tri C3 t3Q 07 0 m D 0)OI to rn m q r� CC e ° C a C G ca c C c t c m a a 0 � v o o o 811 p o a C, o o g tV *T a v y� ^b ru'tit pp Q G G.' C+1 © O + 0 + C C+J 4 d C] C5 4V 1•'^ Si Y MO t' 1' Ti Y 1• `• N 4 �� €3 �" E M A�LD F- O n O E A O E @ �f �A} IE, �i 2610 :5 dS d1 P- 6 v 9 C [C m � CL a a r N N i i KI r C dl fJ7 to I71 n1 dl CR C3i O1 5G m [t] m D7 6 q qty 'ci W GO fit G7 Iry p tJ �t M d 1� 'd h c� W+ E Slate Hill Site K Y 50 ILL . \ r "P"' I i '� fv x � . 'Gt A'•��j�'h- i� P ��i�114i�� "_1 ��..,I P done # s },d r,Y.,-..' + t ! -?_ '�• - r"*�''+\.' p.1 _ '. ,y X41' n ..ne #3�i3�b .t, y y M1 1: Zone 4 Legend Zoning ■AG3 '>. NEP " :� EJAG1 + ®AV y ❑ C, ti q, �¢ j , NC2 9 s ��+ IMC2CVOD "I�' + ❑l1 ❑12 DPCD + .j ❑ PRD ?' r,% • 4 : �.�t ,+ ` . n \ �§ , S PTD El P2\ �l LIR3 '. ❑ R4 a :::Rezoning Area;, alp,=1 Site Features �. VALUE Pr mProposed Access Op r -p r a May 25, 2004 Scale: 1"=400' Roanoke VA SELF -STORAGE DESKTOP MARKET STUDY Site Location: 4435 S Peak Blvd Roanoke VA Client: Brian DeLong Desktop Market Analysis performed by: Self Storage 101 SELF STQRAGE 101 We know storage. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 1 of 55 Roanoke VA TABLE OF CONTENTS DESK MARKET STUDY SCOPE....................................................................................................................................3 FORWARD.................................................................................................................................................................5 2016 SELF STORAGE INDUSTRY FACT SHEET...........................................................................................................9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & OPINIONS.......................................................................................................................11 SITEREVIEW............................................................................................................................................................13 AERIALVIEW.......................................................................................................................................................13 MAPVIEW...........................................................................................................................................................14 SITE EVALUATION...............................................................................................................................................15 MARKETREVIEW.....................................................................................................................................................18 DEMOGRAPHICS.................................................................................................................................................20 MARKETSUMMARY............................................................................................................................................22 NEIGHBORHOOD................................................................................................................................................. 24 COMPETITORS BY LOCATION..............................................................................................................................26 COMPETITOR PROFILES......................................................................................................................................28 POTENTIAL NEW SELF STORAGE DEVELOPMENT...............................................................................................35 DEMAND ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................................36 LEASE -UP PERIOD....................................................................................................................................................39 COMPETITOR RATE MATRIX...............................................................................................................................40 MARKETPRICING................................................................................................................................................41 RECOMMENDED UNIT MIX.................................................................................................................................42 12 MONTH STABILIZED INCOME STATEMENT....................................................................................................46 OPERATIONS/MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................48 Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 2 of 55 Roanoke VA DESK MARKET STUDY SCOPE • Executive Summary and Conclusions • Site Review o Satellite View o Map View o Location & Access Commentary • Market review o Demographic information • Market • Growth projections • Income levels • Commercial base o Competitor Information • Map market competitors ■ Rate Matrix • Determine subject property's potential market • Review traffic patterns, likelihood that potential customers will travel to subject site • Basic Financial Analysis o Recommended unit mix o Basic Stabilized Income statement • Operations and Marketing Recommendations A comprehensive study of the market area is necessary to determine the underlying fundamentals that impact the occupancy rates and rental rates. The first step is to define the trade area as a radius. Generally, a suburban property will have a trade area radius of two or three miles, and a more rural property may have a trade area radius of four or five miles. Very dense areas such as Manhattan may only require a trade area of one mile or less. Next, a survey of all the facilities within the trade area must be taken. The most important information to be gathered includes an approximation of the net rentable area and the occupancy rate. While this information can be difficult to obtain due to its proprietary nature, estimates can be obtained from sources such as assessor's offices, phone surveys, and other public sources. This will allow the supply per foot to be calculated. Demand for self -storage is difficult to quantify; however, the following three demographic variables have been shown to induce demand for self -storage: population growth, population density and average household income. Additionally, there may be further demand factors that are difficult to quantify such as a nearby university or highway. An estimate can also be compared to the average supply on the state and national level. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 3 of 55 Roanoke VA On a per -person basis, if the supply is less than the demand, the market is deemed to be undersupplied. If the supply is greater than the demand, the market is deemed to be oversupplied. As a test of reasonableness, a comparison of the conclusion to the average occupancy in the trade area can be made. Generally speaking, oversupplied markets have occupancy rates less than 80 percent and undersupplied markets have rates greater than 90 percent. A market with an average occupancy rate between 80 and 90 percent is deemed to be near equilibrium. Understanding the supply and demand of the trade area is a key component to analyzing and forecasting rental rates. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 4 of 55 Roanoke VA FORWARD The client has engaged Self Storage 101 to conduct a Desktop Pre -Development Site and Market Study for a potential self -storage development or conversion location. The purpose of this report is to provide a cursory offsite review of the subject site and subject market as related to the potential for self -storage development. This study researches sub -markets as related to demographic and competitive data, potential site and location viability within the existing self -storage market and a snapshot of the existing self -storage markets and the potential site's position within those markets. When reviewing the 'marketability' of a potential self -storage location, Self Storage 101 reviews four distinct areas that are critical in determining the site and market viability: 1. The Site and its Location. As self -storage has become ever more a retail -type business, facility location has become more critical than in past times when self -storage facilities were located in industrial parks or behind the local airport. From a location standpoint, customers typically want their stored goods within a convenient distance. Although few do, nearly all new customers perceive that they will be accessing their unit frequently. Therefore, they will seek a location that is in close proximity to where they live, work, shop, or otherwise frequent. This would include residential areas, grocery stores, banks, restaurants, or recreational areas. The industry is evolving where the trend is to locate self storage away from industrial areas and into retail and residential areas. When looking at the specific location, we are evaluating the site for its visibility, accessibility, proximity to potential residential and commercial tenants and its geographical relationship to the other self -storage competitors within the subject market. While contemplating a potential site's suitability it is important to review signage and other marketing opportunities necessary to enhance the subject location's 'statement' within the market. Access: Some self storage facilities are quite visible but have poor access. That is, the customer who wants to visit cannot locate the facility entrance, has difficulty crossing traffic or slowing down, or has a moving truck that cannot make a certain turn required to enter the facility. Prospective customers will visit facilities with easy access more often. Visibility: The typical storage customer, upon deciding that a storage unit is needed, will remember seeing a storage facility in or around an area that they frequent. They usually will inquire at this facility to determine the price and availability of storage. A visible development, which is clearly a storage facility, will maximize the number of new customer inquiries. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 5 of 55 Roanoke VA Traffic Count: It is important to know the traffic count of the roadways in which the facility is visible. This represents the number of cars that will pass by the facility during the average day. Annual average daily traffic information can be obtained from the local department of transportation. Ideally, the majority of the cars passing the site represent local traffic as opposed to commuter traffic; that is, they carry people who are living, working, or shopping in the immediate area. How much local traffic is necessary depends upon the size of the facility. Facilities that are quite large should have traffic counts in excess of 15,000 cars per day, whereas, small facilities may require less than 5,000. It is also important to note the following as they relate to market position: 1. Amenities. Self -storage customers are becoming more discerning about their self -storage choices and those facilities lacking in 'market amenities' are finding themselves at a disadvantage. 2. Curb Appeal. Self -storage customers sometimes make their decisions regarding a specific site based on the initial look of the facility. A dirty, debris -laden parking lot and trashy landscaping is likely indicative of a poorly managed facility and uncaring managers. 3. Specials and Discounts. The more competitive a market, the more likely it is that a facility will be forced to integrate some type of aggressive move -in discounting in its marketing scheme. 4. Statistics. Most self -storage customers 'shopping' for storage end up renting storage. A critical question to ask when reviewing a self -storage facility is 'why or why not would a potential customer rent here?' 2. The Market. Self -storage demand in any market is determined bythe needs of potential customers and thus, simply having self -storage inventory does nothing to increasing that potential demand. A crucial piece of the 'marketability' puzzle is attempting to determine if there is sufficient demand for self -storage supply. New self -storage customers can come from only a small number of demand pools: population growth, commercial growth or pent up demand not being met by the existing competitors. An underlying question we must ask in evaluating a self -storage facility is 'why would potential self -storage customers rent here?' What about the market indicates that the subject site should garner a share of the move -in activity? 3. The Competitors. Determining the rates, occupancy levels and amenities offered by the market competitors is an important factor in determining the quality of the local self -storage market and the propensity for a reasonable occupancy level and revenue growth for a new self -storage development. Our in-person evaluations of the market competitors are designed to compile both anecdotal and quantitative evidence of the 'marketability' of a particular self -storage facility. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 6 of 55 Roanoke VA The days of 'build it and they will come' are long over within the self -storage industry. More than ever before it does matter what the competitors are offering in order to entice potential customers. There simply may not be enough potential customers looking for storage in a particular sub -market and any new development will have to be positioned within the market to garner an acceptable percentage of the existing self -storage demand. 4. The Manager. There are very few business models that are as 'manager -centric' as self -storage. Oftentimes, customers do not remember the name of the facility but they almost always know the name of the manager. We believe that an A+ facility with a C- manager is a C- facility. It is absolutely critical that a self -storage company hire, train and develop on-site managers at the highest level. The view of managers as 'baby sitters' reflects a view of the business model that is outdated and becoming increasingly less viable. A self -storage manager must have excellent sales abilities, know how to use effective collections techniques and effectively utilize time management skills. In an ever increasingly competitive business cycle, self -storage facilities must have a higher level manager than their competitors. Our evidence shows that in any market, the facilities with the most professional managers almost always have the highest occupancy levels and the highest market rates. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 7 of 55 Roanoke VA This report was prepared exclusively for our client. While every attempt is made to provide the highest level of accuracy and reliability, it must be recognized that the report relies heavily on written and verbal information provided by others. In some cases, these sources are competitors, who may have a vested interest in skewing data. Every attempt has been made to eliminate possible misrepresentations. Self Storage 101 accepts no responsibility and shall not be liable for misinformation, either intentional or accidental, and cannot be held responsible for any decisions the developer may make based on this report. Reliable sources and redundant checks are employed, but there is always an outside chance that data can be missed. One should be aware of that fact in decision making based on this report. It should be noted that the assumptions herein are based on the use of seasoned professionals in the development, entitlement, design, construction, marketing and management of the property. Self Storage 101 states that it has no financial interest in the development of this proposed project. The payment of professional fees agreed upon for this report was in no manner contingent upon the results and opinions stated within this report. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 8 of 55 Roanoke VA 2016 SELF STORAGE INDUSTRY FACT SHEET12 •The self storage industry has been one of the fastest-growing sectors of the United States commercial real estate industry over the period of the last 40 years •There are now over 48,500 "primary" self storage facilities in the United States as of year-end 2014; another 4,000 are "secondary" facilities ("primary" means that self storage is the "primary" source of business revenue — US Census Bureau) •There are approximately 60,000 self storage facilities worldwide as of Q2 — 2015; there are more than 3,000 in Canada and more than 1,000 in Australia. •Total self storage rentable space in the US is roughly 2.5 billion square feet [more than 210 million square meters]. That figure represents more than 78 square miles of rentable self storage space, under roof— or an area well more than 3 times the size of Manhattan Island (NY) •U.S. self storage facilities pay a total of more than $3.25 billion in property taxes to local government jurisdictions. •The distribution of U.S. self storage facilities (Q2-2015) is as follows: 32% urban, 52% suburban and 16% rural. •The average revenue per square foot varies from facility to facility; however, here are the data for Q2 2015: $1.25 PSF for a non -climate controlled 10 x 10 unit and $1.60 PSF for a climate controlled 10 x 10 unit. •Occupancy rates for self storage facilities as of Q2-2015 were 90% (percentage of units rented per facility) up from 86.8% at year-end 2013. •In fact, about 9.5% of all American households currently rent a self storage unit (10.85 million of the 113.3 million US HHs in 2013; that has increased from 1 in 17 US HHs (6%) in 1995 (18 years ago). •U.S. self storage facilities employed more than 170,000 persons, or an average of 3.5 employees per facility. •The average (mean) size of a "primary" self storage facility in the US is approximately 56,900 square feet. •Of over 10,000 facilities surveyed, approximately 6,000 are single -story facilities and approximately 4,000 are multi -story facilities. •Of over 10,000 facilities surveyed, the mean facility size is 546 units and the median facility size is 517 units. •Of over 10,000 facilities surveyed, 18.7% offer Boat / RV parking and/or storage. •Of over 10,000 facilities surveyed, 31% offer truck rental. •The top -6 self storage companies, including 5 real estate investment trusts (Public Storage, Extra Space, National Storage Affiliates Trust, LifeStorage and CubeSmart) plus U -Haul (a public company / non -REIT), own, operate and/or manage some 5,800 self storage facilities, or about 12% of all US facilities. Several public companies are now offering third -party management of facilities owned by other investors. 1 Compiled from the SSA Website z as of 7/1/15 Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 9 of 55 Roanoke VA Hundreds of facilities are now being managed by the three public companies that have moved into this service area. •In addition to the public companies in the industry (above), there are more than 150 privately held firms that own and operate 10 or more self storage facilities. In addition, there are some 4,000 firms that own and operate from 2-9 self storage facilities. Lastly, there are more than 26,000 firms that own and operate just one facility. •There is a total U.S. self storage space capacity of about 21 sq. ft. per American household. •There is 7.3 sq. ft. of self storage space for every man, woman and child in the nation; thus, it is physically possible that every American could stand — all at the same time — under the total canopy of self storage roofing. •About 13% of all self storage renters say they will rent for less than 3 months; 18% for 3-6 months; 18% for 7-12 months; 22% for 1-2 years; and 30% for more than 2 years. •Some 68% of all self storage renters live in a single-family household; 27% live in an apartment or condo. •Some 65% of all self storage renters have a garage but still rent a unit; 47% have an attic in their home; and 33% have a basement. •Some 47% of all self storage renters have an annual household income of less than $50,000 per year; 63% have an annual household income of less than $75,000 per year. •More than 1.5 million self storage units nationwide are rented to military personnel (6% of all units); however, in communities adjacent to domestic US military bases, military occupancy can be from 20% to 95% of all rented units. •Self Storage operators value military personnel as self storage customers and traditionally extend special incentives and discounts to those with a valid military ID card, such as: 10%-30% discounts off rental rates, free months of rent, gift certificates, free use of moving truck, "one -dollar move -ins," no rent increases while deployed overseas, waiver of security deposits, administration fees, etc. •It took the self storage industry more than 25 years to build its first billion square feet of space; it added the second billion square feet in just 8 years (1998-2005). •83.9% of all US counties (or 2,634 out of 3,141) have at least one "primary" self storage facility. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 10 of 55 Roanoke VA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & OPINIONS On or about August 29, 2018, the Team at Self Storage 101 conducted a Self Storage Desk Market Study for a specific potential development or conversion site in the Roanoke, VA market. The study included an offsite examination of the subject property, a review of the self -storage competitors in the market and the demographic profile of the subject market. It is our opinion that the market is favorable for the development of the amount of self -storage space contemplated by the developer and in particular climate controlled space. We do believe it is likely that acceptable financial assumptions and returns can be met, assuming the land and development costs are not overly burdensome, and that these return calculations would be impacted by what we would calculate to be an acceptable lease -up period and moderately high rental rates. We should note that as the Desktop Study level of reporting we recommend NOT moving forward on a particular project approximately 50% of the time and for those reports we do recommend moving forward, we generally rank those recommendations from between 'marginally favorable' to 'highly favorable' and those recommendations are, generally, about one third 'marginally favorable', one third 'favorable, and one third 'highly favorable'. Our opinion is based on the following: • The square foot demand calculations would appear to indicate that the subject market up to the three-mile demographic profile is under -developed by at least a modest amount of storage space and there is sufficient amount of unmet self storage space demand for the contemplated development and in particular for climate controlled storage space. o We also believe that various factors (outlined in the 'Demand' section of the report) would clearly indicate that there is sufficient demand for climate controlled storage space, as contemplated by the subject development. • The subject site's financial viability is impacted by the moderate to moderately high rental rates for climate controlled storage space in place at the market competitors and for this reason we have created a recommended unit mix with 100% climate controlled space. o The average rental rate for a 10x10 non climate unit is $109 per month while the average rental rate for a 10x10 climate unit is $139 per month. o The 'blended' rental rate for the recommended unit mix is $16.24 per square foot (per year), a rental rate generally found to be high enough to warrant new development and a rate that is likely to produce sufficiently high enough financial returns to warrant the investment risk associated with the asset class. o The financial viability of the subject project will be dependent on the developer's securing reasonable development costs. o The stabilized income statement would indicate an asset value of +/- $11,915,000 (assuming a 6.75% cap rate). Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 11 of 55 Roanoke VA o We would estimate the new facility would cost, less the land value, between $70-75 per gross square foot to develop, or $7,000,000 to $7,500,000. We believe this particular potential development is represented as a 'B+' market and the site is a 'B-' site. We consider this a 'B+' market due to what appears to be moderately high to high occupancy levels, the calculation of at least a modest amount of potential unmet demand for additional self storage space in the market, the moderately high to high rental rates for storage space, the moderate to moderately high per capita and household income levels, the moderately low population density and projected population growth. (We would consider this an 'A' market if there was a higher calculated demand for storage in the market and the population density was higher). We would consider this a 'B-' site due to the location with good visibility from a moderately high to high traffic count roadway, the close proximity to residential customers, the small 'owned' market of the site (due to the lack of competition in closer proximity to the north and east) and the potential for population drive by opportunities in close proximity. (We would consider this an 'A' site if the traffic count on the frontage road was higher and if the population density in closer proximity was higher). The lack of storage space owned and operated by sophisticated, institutional operators in the market does indicate that substantial rental rate increases should likely not be expected as occupancy levels increase. Any proforma increases in the rental rates would not be influenced by the presence of properties owned and managed by institutions. In markets where institutional investments have been made, once projects meet stabilized occupancy, rental rates tend to be aggressively managed, thus creating opportunities for increased rents. Where institutionally -owned projects are not prevalent, owner -managed properties tend to have lower rents and a greatly reduced propensity for annual and/or aggressive yield and revenue management. This first paradigm does not exist in the Roanoke market, and so therefore we would not necessarily expect the rental rates to increase as the occupancy levels increase. Our Opinions and Recommendations are based on the information contained herein the following report. We would recommend that the developer consider further examination of this potential site for self storage development. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 12 of 55 . %� r., • ,��'�� , � �. w eaten x � � U Q Ste. mw NO * Y: 0-+ ((�y5{{�,... o 0 a w 4 O 2 O �, Cyd SE K 11�JI f5 73 Z O Q W Q 9 00 c-1 O N CLD C O N D m _O O ai to O In (n ro Q S F g N O IY yJ o Pb�9}'1am9 C Z 1'J � � � � O W F N w W J U � � N o N O p N $YI Rd ci Z O Z 35 anbgro � "�U�i4 O z Z O Z s g V *}n y W ¢ U'w Z IY � O w� O o l7 w a c g V O � w FMHd aga�a unr rr a cS h q _ a � E u J a� $ 11 QJ N � O Q T E � � a F" � O N V Hunt�h9 klllap q®a .phyom(i a a µ W U 6 C } o x x a o x Q= N R a C A qI Jx Q yds OM O = Y N 9 00 c-1 O N CLD C O N D m _O O ai to O In (n ro Q S z yJ o Pb�9}'1am9 Z � � � � O W F N w W J U � � N o N O p N $YI Rd ci Z O Z Z � J z Z O Z Z g V *}n K W ¢ U'w Z IY w� Q o l7 w O � N a h q _ a 9 00 c-1 O N CLD C O N D m _O O ai to O In (n ro Q z w m o � � � w W J z a o o $YI Rd ci Z y, FA Z K W ¢ U'w Z IY Q s LL l7 w h q _ a u J a� 9 00 c-1 O N CLD C O N D m _O O ai to O In (n ro Q Roanoke VA SITE EVALUATION VISIBILITY: The subject site should be developed in such a manner as to have a high level of visibility from Franklin Road, what appears to be a moderately high to high traffic count primary roadway in the subject market. When asked "Why did you rent from a particular self -storage facility?' for a Self Storage Market Study conducted by the SSA, customers overwhelmingly responded 'because I saw it.' There are few market conditions that can more positively affect a potential site's viability than high visibility from a high traffic primary arterial. Tenants tend to store close to home and at a facility that 'fits' into their normal commute patterns. The subject site should rank high on the 'visibility' scale from Franklin. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 15 of 55 Roanoke VA ACCESS: The subject site should have very good access for both directions of travelers on Peak Blvd as there are no road dividers in this section of the roadway. Travelers in both directions of travel along Electric Road, another higher traffic count primary roadway, will also have good access to the access road to the subject site. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 16 of 55 Roanoke VA TRAFFIC COUNT: The subject site is located with good visibility from what appears to be a moderately high to high traffic count roadway in the subject market. Since a large percentage of potential self storage customers tend to gravitate to a particular facility because of an initial drive-by, we encourage the developer to take advantage of the lack of internet presence and sophistication on the part of some the market competitors and to take advantage of the visibility from the roadway by maximizing the amount of signage allowed at the site. We would also encourage the developer to create and implement and robust, effective internet marketing plan, including a professional website with online rates and reservations, as well as concerted SEO (search engine optimization) efforts, in order to take further marketing advantage over some of the competitors. LOCATION RELATIVE TO COMPETITORS: The subject site does appear to enjoy some level of location advantage as it is located with very good visibility from a higher traffic count roadway than some of the competitors. It also appears to 'own' a sub -section of the market as there are no self storage competitors located in close proximity to the east and northwest. It is important to note that the subject property should have a distinct management advantage over most, if not all, of the competitors. Self -storage is a highly 'manager -centric' business model and the level of management expertise in the Roanoke sub -market is, at best, mediocre to poor. Our opinion is based on making phone call to some of the competitors, some knowledge of this particular sub -market and an overall knowledge base of the level of management expertise at all, if not most, of the larger self -storage operators. (For example, Uhaul generally has some of the most consistently 'C' level managers and Public Storage generally has 'B' to 'B-' managers, while Cubesmart, Extra Space and Life Storage generally have much more highly rated onsite managers). A strong sales -oriented manager will garner his or her fair share of the self -storage market in this sub- market of Roanoke. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 17 of 55 Roanoke VA MARKET REVIEW The following demographic profile is based on the concentric map: 1-, 2- and 3 mile radii from the subject site. It is our belief that the primary customer base for the subject site resides within three miles of the subject site. Understanding the customer demographics of the surrounding market area is essential for storage developers, owners, and operators. Accurately identifying the types of customers, as well as their wants and needs, is critical in order to form the necessary operational and marketing decisions for a facility. In a market area comprised of a high percentage of commercial or business tenants, add-ons such as on- site conference rooms, free Wi-Fi, central workspaces, climate control, or other amenities that carry special appeal for business customers can be profitable. In areas with older renters or senior citizens, convenience -oriented services such as professional packing and moving assistance could prove valuable. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 18 of 55 Roanoke VA The largest proportion of tenants is typically residential customers. While approximately 70 percent of all storage tenants tend to fall in this category, it is important to understand that these numbers can change from market area to market area. In those areas with a predominantly residential customer base, operators need to keep in mind that life changes often drive the decision to need storage. This can range from a divorce or death in the family to remodeling or selling a home. Depending on the housing specifics in the market area, residential customers may also consist of apartment or condo dwellers who do not have enough storage space where they live. On a national basis while 68 percent of residential customers tend to live in a single-family home, nearly 30 percent reside in multi -family housing. Another important demographic for self -storage is to know what percentage of your customers are male and female. It is noted that 85 percent of all purchases are made by women and 80 percent of all purchasing decisions are made by women. This means that although men may do the heavy lifting in terms of moving in or out of a unit, the actual rental or decision to rent was likely made by a woman. It should be noted that 57.7 percent of storage renters in 2014 were men and 42.3 percent were women. However, if 85 percent of the decisions on where to rent are actually made by women, the scales are tipped even farther in favor of women as likely storage customers. Customer age is another demographic that should be considered, especially in terms of the amenities and services offered at a facility. The largest percentage of renters are between the ages of 46 and 55. Falling right behind that are the 36 to 45 and 56 to 65 age groups at 22 percent and 21 percent, respectively. On average, 13 percent tend to be customers over age 65. Understandably, the smallest percentage of storage customers -3 percent—is represented by millennials under age 25. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 19 of 55 Roanoke VA DEMOGRAPHICS' Description 1 Miles 2 Miles 3 Miles POPULATION BY YEAR Population (4/1/1990) 4,569 22,624 50,670 Population (4/1/2000) 4,854 23,636 51,395 Population (4/1/2010) 5,495 23,411 50,727 Population (1/1/2018) 5,607 23,850 51,937 Population (1/1/2023) 5,734 24,370 53,137 Percent Growth (2018/2010) 2.04 1.88 2.39 Percent Forecast (2023/2018) 2.27 2.18 2.31 HOUSEHOLDS BY YEAR Households (4/1/1990) 2,167 10,225 23,089 Households (4/1/2000) 2,421 11,134 24,114 Households (4/1/2010) 2,919 11,356 24,090 Households (1/1/2018) 2,987 11,601 24,705 Households (1/1/2023) 3,070 11,912 25,382 Percent Growth (2018/2010) 2.33 2.16 2.55 Percent Forecast (2023/2018) 2.78 2.68 2.74 GENERAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Median Age 47.9 46.4 42.9 Male 2,534 11,057 24,604 Female 3,073 12,793 27,333 Density 1,610.8 1,925.4 2,053.1 Urban 5,607 23,850 51,478 Rural 0 0 459 GENERAL HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS Households (1/1/2018) 2,987 11,601 24,705 Families 1,352 6,219 13,243 Non -Family Households 1,635 5,382 11,462 Average Size of Household 1.83 2.04 2.08 Median Age of Householder 54.5 54.6 51.8 Median Value Owner Occupied ($) 340,329 228,880 194,738 Median Rent ($) 687 716 650 Median Vehicles Per Household 2.1 2.2 2.1 GENERAL HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Housing, Units 3,476 12,833 27,210 Housing, Owner Occupied 1,100 6,918 13,843 Housing, Renter Occupied 1,887 4,683 10,862 Housing, Vacant 489 1,232 2,505 POPULATION BY RACE White Alone 4,422 20,835 44,394 Black Alone 602 1,356 3,757 Asian Alone 373 888 1,754 American Indian and Alaska Native Alone 23 63 122 Other Race Alone 37 139 477 Two or More Races 150 569 1,433 1 The demographic profile is compiled through a subscription service. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 20 of 55 Roanoke VA POPULATION BY ETHNICITY Hispanic 170 626 1,707 White Non -Hispanic 4,317 20,435 43,391 GENERAL INCOME CHARACTERISTICS Total Household Income ($) 245,135,197 1,269,315,749 2,289,554,510 Median Household Income 59,858 78,015 67,671 Average Household Income ($) 82,067 109,414 92,676 Per Capita Income 45,076 53,548 44,438 RETAIL SALES Total Retail Sales (including Food Services) ($) 149,819 481,456 911,194 CONSUMER EXPENDITURES Total Annual Expenditures ($000) 174,902.5 774,543.1 1,554,489.4 EMPLOYMENT BY PLACE OF BUSINESS Employees, Total (by Place of Work) 2,617 10,798 23,337 Establishments, Total (by Place of Work) 183 803 1,611 The demographic profile indicates that the population and household numbers are projected to increase over the next five years. It also indicates that the household and per capita income levels are at moderate to moderately high numbers and the population density is in the moderately low range. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 21 of 55 Roanoke VA MARKET SUMMARY Roanoke, VA •Z---'>' F • AL..'FF1Fl.1.) Employment VA+TE SUUP!- M SPF4NGS 1. 1.5 1-0% 0.536 0.036 hr4� -0.536 ` 'V 2 -1.536 -2.036 -2.536 -2.8% Jan 2014 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics 2 •LYNCHBLRG Sep 207'5 May 2,017 Jul 211€ D ate Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 22 of 55 Roanoke VA Pricing 1 �69 $1-€0 1-50 $1.40 $1-30 $1-20 I $1-10 $1-00 S $0-90 0.81 01 filar 2017 Source= Union Realtime Promotions 100% 90'% 806 a 70 E 0 `- 60 50% 'e 4 40% 30 20 Icy ,Aug 2017 15 Jul 2017 02 Dec 2017 14 Apr 2018 25 Aug 2018 Date • Public Storage Jan 20'18 Date Source.: Unioi Rea - i - Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 May 2018 Aug 20118 9001 Page 23 of 55 Roanoke VA NEIGHBORHOOD The neighborhood in close proximity to the subject site is primarily comprised of vacant land parcels, single family homes and residential neighborhoods and a number of commercial enterprises of various types and sizes. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 r F %:. .R� l.a • r ft -V V' rn, :�:4 Roanoke VA COMPETITORS BY LOCATION In most subject markets there are additional self storage competitors we may not have included in the map and profiles. If we have not included any competitors within the subject market it is due to those facilities being very small or small (as related to rentable square footage or numbers of units) and/or their being so limited in quality and amenities as to not warrant consideration as a competitor of the subject site. An important step in determining the feasibility of building a self storage facility at a particular location is the level and quality of competition within the target market area as well as the potential for future competition. The examination of the existing competition must be done using both market demand calculations and a review of the quality of the market competitors. The 'quality' issues include the examination of the competitive stores' curb appeal, ingress and egress, over-all visibility, the professionalism of the management staff, security features, the facility's Unit Mix between standard and climate controlled spaces and the competitors' locations relative to the subject site within the target market area. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 26 of 55 Roanoke VA We should point out that there is a clear delineation between 'primary' and 'secondary' competitors. 'Primary' competitors consist of those self -storage facilities that are the most likely to compete for the same tenant base as the subject site. These competitors are determined by proximity to the primary market, amenity level, marketing prowess and management expertise. A self -storage facility that is close in proximity may not necessarily qualify as a primary competitor if the level of amenities is low, they have no marketing in place or the management is of a very low quality. When deciding on the primary competitors, we ask ourselves 'if a prospective tenant does not rent from the subject site, where would they rentT Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 27 of 55 Roanoke VA COMPETITOR PROFILES4 1. Rent -A -Space 4221 Valley Ave Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 384-1905 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 0.24 miles 1990s 90-95% +/-45,000 No Single 2nd Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface No No Yes Yes No No Asphalt Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal B+ B+ B+ B+ B B Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours B+ B M -F 9-5:30 Sat 9-2 Sun Closed 7AM-9PM Daily Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes A Comments: u -haul truck rental, 12th month free — no pre pay Property Photo 4 The Competitor Profiles are completely filled in during onsite visits as part of the scope of work in a full Feasibility Study. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 28 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down Climate Up Non Climate $91 $126 $150 $175 Comments: u -haul truck rental, 12th month free — no pre pay Property Photo 4 The Competitor Profiles are completely filled in during onsite visits as part of the scope of work in a full Feasibility Study. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 28 of 55 Roanoke VA 2. Blue Ridge Self Storage 5045 Benois Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-7700 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 1.25 miles 1990s 90% +/-41,000 No Single 2nd Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface Yes No Yes Yes No No Asphalt Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal C C C B B B Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours B C+ M -F 9-5 Sat 9-12 Sun Closed 24 hours Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating Yes Yes No No No Yes C Comments: Hard to find! There is a small sign our on the main road — units located up on a hill — nice lady — limited availability, U -haul trucks Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 29 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down $92 $132 N/A N/A $45 Climate Up Non Climate $50 $80 $110 $136 $158 Comments: Hard to find! There is a small sign our on the main road — units located up on a hill — nice lady — limited availability, U -haul trucks Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 29 of 55 Roanoke VA lJ as AIJL t Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 30 of 55 Roanoke VA 3. Starkey Road Self Storage 5215 Starkey Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 989-5129 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 1.35 miles 1990s 90-95% +/-56,700 No Single 2nd Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers Yes Yes No Yes No No No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface Yes No No Yes No No Asphalt Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal B B B B B B Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours B B M -F 9-5 Sat Closed Sun Closed 6AM-10PM Daily Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating No Comments: only have 5x10 and 10x10 available now, parking full Property Photo AAd Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 31 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down $35 Climate Up Non Climate $80 $100 $125 $155 Comments: only have 5x10 and 10x10 available now, parking full Property Photo AAd Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 31 of 55 Roanoke VA 4. Allstore 2734 Colonial Ave SW Roanoke, VA 24015 (540) 345-5666 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 1.55 miles 1990s 90-95% +/-30,000 No Single 2nd Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface No No No Yes No No Asphalt Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal D C C C C C Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours B C- M -F 8:30- 4:30 Sat 9-1 Sun Closed 6AM-10PM Daily Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating Yes No No No No Yes C Comments: limited availability - "few 10x10 and 5x10" Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 32 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down $95 $120 N/A $173 Climate Up Non Climate Comments: limited availability - "few 10x10 and 5x10" Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 32 of 55 Roanoke VA Virginia Varsity Self Storage 5885 Starkey Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 440-1060 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 2.09 miles 1990s 90% +/-39,350 No Single 2nd Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface No No No Yes No No Asphalt Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal B B B B+ B B Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours B+ B M -F 8:30- 5:30 Sat 8:30-2 Sun Closed 6AM-10PM Daily Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes A Comments: limited availability Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 33 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down $121 $165 $219 Climate Up Non Climate $61 $91 $129 $154 $197 Comments: limited availability Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 33 of 55 Roanoke VA Greenway Self -Storage 1306 8t" St SW Roanoke, VA 24015 (540) 556-8219 Distance from Subject Year Built Occupancy Net Square Feet REIT? Single or Multi Story Generation 2.49 miles 1990s 95% +/-8,300 No Single 1st Climate Control Controlled Access Gate 24 Hour Access Convenient Parking Door Alarms Cameras Fire Sprinklers No No Yes Yes No No No Boat/RV Parking Covered Parking Truck Rental Retail Ready Office Resident Manager Elevator Drive Surface No No No Yes No No Gravel Property Ratings Visibility Location Traffic Count Access Condition Curb Appeal B B B+ B C- C_ Drive Width Manager Office Quality Overall Rating Office Hours Office Hours Access Hours C C M -F 9-5 Sat Closed Sun Closed 24 hours Website Online Rates? Dynamic? Reservations? Specials? Features? Website Rating No Comments: left message — called multiple days and multiple times - He called me back Q - super nice — he built storage units inside an old barn — only have 6x10 right now - and only offer 6x10 and 8x12 - said there's lots of traffic and he's had good luck with tenants Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 34 of 55 5x5 5x10 10x10 10x15 10x20 Parking Climate Down Climate Up Non Climate $55 (6x10) $80 (8x12) Comments: left message — called multiple days and multiple times - He called me back Q - super nice — he built storage units inside an old barn — only have 6x10 right now - and only offer 6x10 and 8x12 - said there's lots of traffic and he's had good luck with tenants Property Photo Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 34 of 55 Roanoke VA POTENTIAL NEW SELF STORAGE DEVELOPMENT Our review of a subscription based new construction database indicated the following: There are no new self -storage developments either in planning stages or under construction within the subject market. There is a number of new self -storage facilities either in planning stages or under construction within the Roanoke market. One was noted to be close enough to the subject site to be considered a competitor. • K -Mart Conversion o Phoenix Partners LLC o 3533 Franklin Road SW o Pipeline Status: Permitted o Scheduled Square Footage: 68,000 o Site is .64 miles from the subject site We have included any known new self -storage developments in the following demand calculations. It is important to note that despite any one group's due diligence efforts in determining whether or not new self storage developments may or may not be coming into a particular sub -market, there is always the possibility that a new development is planned but has not yet progressed sufficiently to have shown up in any new construction websites or databases. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 35 of 55 Roanoke VA DEMAND ANALYSIS A widely accepted methodology for calculating demand in a market is to examine the amount of storage square footage in the market per capita. The reader is cautioned that the square -foot -per -capita analysis lacks credibility. A benchmark that reflects saturation or demand levels has not been established for any U.S. market. Sufficient data is not available to determine what the threshold for demand may be. Furthermore, making use of the Self -Storage Almanac metro guides and top markets is problematic because of their methodology in determining the supply. What the Almanac has done is to apply an average size facility of 51,150 square feet and multiply the number of facilities in a market (presumably from the phone book) times 51,150. That is how they calculated the number of square feet in a market. The analysis is only as good as the analyst's confidence that the average size of stores (facilities) is the same in every market in the U.S., and that the average size is 51,150. What one will find in making use of data from the Almanac is that it is difficult to draw any conclusion as to what the "right" or maximum square -foot -per -capita number is. For example, the highest level is in Wichita Kansas at 10.88 square feet per capita. The lowest is in the Honolulu metropolitan area at 2.36 square feet per capita. In both markets, occupancies can be found to be similar. You cannot, therefore, conclude that the supply threshold for Honolulu is over 10 times the current supply. The only way to properly assess and analyze square -foot -per -capita demand analysis is to first get an accurate count of square footage. Second, the supply needs to be juxtaposed with occupancies. There are only too many square feet per capita when there are too many available square feet, as measured by vacancy. That is to say that the number of square feet per capita has to be quantified by occupancy, and when occupancy drops, then supply has exceeded demand. This market analysis would indicate that the three-mile subject market is most likely 'under -supplied' as evidenced in part by the anecdotal evidence of moderately high to high occupancy levels thru onsite manager comments and the dynamic pricing models utilized by some of the competitors. (On those websites that use dynamic pricing, unit sizes with limited or no availability will either not be listed on the site or not have any promotion discounts or indicated 'call for availability' instead of'reserve'). We believe that the review of the market and the competitors would indicate that there is osme amount of unmet demand in the market for the contemplated improvements and the demand calculations and anecdotal evidence of higher occupancy levels appear to substantiate that indication. While we do not necessarily prescribe to calculating and reviewing the demand numbers in a 'vacuum', we have made those calculations using averages facility sizes and MSA demand and supply numbers from the Self Storage Almanac and a review of those numbers would support the development of at least a modest amount of additional self -storage space as contemplated with the development project. Those demand calculations follow. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 36 of 55 Roanoke VA Using the national average demand calculation number for comparison, as well as the State and National demand calculations the analysis would indicate that there is likely no amount of unmet demand within the one -mile and two-mile demographic profiles but a substantial amount of unmet demand within the three-mile demographic profile. We should note that it is our belief that the primary demographic that would constitute a large percentage of the potential tenant base resides within three -miles of the subject site. Notes: • 'Radius' refers to the mile radius within the sub -market with the subject site as the central point in that radius. • 'Subject Property' is referring to the square foot per person within the subject site within the particular radius. • The 'MSA SQ/CAP' is the comparison number used per the 2017 Self Storage Almanac that represents the amount of rentable square feet per person in the subject site MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) • The 'State SQ/CAP' is the number reported by the 2017 Self Storage Almanac for the state in which the subject site is located. • The 'US Average' is the amount of square footage per person across the US as reported in the 2017 Self Storage Almanac. We use this average number for our demand calculation analysis as the subject market would be considered 'under -supplied' given the low average per person number. • The 'Highest MSA/US-is the highest average square foot per person noted in the US, the Wichita KS MSA. • The 'Lowest MSA/US' is the lowest average square foot per person noted in the US, the Honolulu HI MSA. • The first section of the calculated demand includes the market competitors. • The second section of the calculated demand includes subject property and the market competitors. • There are two columns of calculated demand in each section: o The first column calculates the demand including the population as reported in the demographic report plus an additional 10% of demand calculated for commercial users. ■ The amount of commercial users can vary from nearly 0% to a much more substantial percentage, depending on subject site location and the demographic profile of the subject market. We have used 10% for the subject site due to the location in a suburban market within a commercial/retail area. o The second column calculates the demand including the population as reported in the demographic report with no amount of demand calculated for commercial users. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 37 of 55 Roanoke VA RADIUS SUBJECT PROPERTY Variances 1 MILE 20.15 2 MILE 10.09 _ 3 MILE 5.55 CALCULATION MSA STATE US HIGHEST LOWEST SQ/CAP SQ/CAP AVERAGE MSA US MSA US 6.03 6.03 14.12 14.12 4.06 4.06 -0.48 -0.48 Demand Calculations Including the noted competitors in the subject market 7.82 10.88 2.36 12.33 9.27 _ 17.79 2.27 -0.79 7.73 -2.27 -5.33 _ 3.19 2018 # OF SQUARE SQUARE FEET Potential Unmet Demand Potential Unmet Demand POPULATIOFACILITIES FOOTAGE PER CAPITA Comp: MSA SF/Person Comp: MSA SF/Person Plus 10% Commercial No Commercial RADIUS 1 MILE 5607 2 113000 20.15 2 MILE 23850 5 240700 10.09 3 MILE 51937 7 288350 5.55 The highlighted numbers indicate the amount of unmet square footage demand within the various demographic profiles. Any = highlighted numbers would indicate the amount of over -supply within the various demographic profiles. We should note that we have used estimated square footage sizes for the market competitors based on local assessor or other websites and/or google earth views. While it is likely these facility sizes would change with a more thorough onsite market study we do not believe the numbers would change dramatically. While we acknowledge that consideration of a particular market's per person square footage demand is an important consideration when contemplating the development of a new self storage facility we also strongly believe that there is a temptation to assign far too much importance to this one aspect of a potential development. These demand numbers would suggest that there is likely at least a modest amount of unmet demand within the three-mile demographic profile of the subject site and that it is more than likelythatthis subject market is under -supplied. However, it is important to note that the demand calculations do not discern between the demand levels for non -climate controlled storage space and climate controlled storage space. We believe, that due to the limited amount of available climate controlled space in the market, the moderately higher income levels in the market and the moderately high rental rates for climate controlled storage space in the market that there is, in fact, more than sufficient demand for additional climate controlled storage space in the subject market. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 38 of 55 Roanoke VA LEASE -UP PERIOD To deliver the most successful pricing plans, many factors are evaluated including street rates, discounts, inventory levels, historic trends, and move -in specials. Combining the data to determine optimal target occupancy for a specific self -storage store is somewhat of an art form. As always, business conditions in a facility's immediate market area must be considered when creating occupancy strategies for individual storage stores. Since self -storage is a highly localized industry, conditions in the immediate market area surrounding the store can have a major impact on occupancy rates. Factors such as a depressed local economy or the opening of a new storage facility in the area can potentially lead to a decline in occupancy. On the other end of the spectrum, new home developments, an explosion in recruitment at local companies, and other dynamics are often met with sharp increases in occupancy rates. In general, most industry experts agree that target occupancy rates for self -storage stores in the U.S. should hover in the 90 to 95 percent range. When a store has too many unoccupied units, it is unable to generate money to its full potential. On the other hand, self -storage facilities with too few vacant storage spaces will have to turn customers away—some of whom would have been willing to pay more for a unit than the current tenants are paying. In addition, most unserved potential customers will end up as tenants at competing self -storage stores. Due to the current demand for self -storage space in the micro market as represented by the high occupancy levels in the market, it is our opinion that the subject facility should anticipate a 36 -month lease -up period to stabilization. This assumption is predicated upon the belief that the market will remain as strong as it currently is and that the developer will upgrade, manage and market the facility as an 'A+' facility using most, if not all, of the included recommendations (such as employing only the highest caliber of onsite management). We also predicate this opinion on the recognition that the developer is an experienced self -storage operator or will utilize the services of an experienced self -storage operator or third -party management company. This assumption is based on the following: • There is some amount of calculated and anecdotal unmet demand for new self -storage inventory near the subject facility based on the estimated and known occupancy levels of the market competitors as well as comments from competitor managers. • There is at least one other known potential self -storage project in development within the subject micro -market. • The management expertise level at the subject site should afford the new facility a substantial sales and marketing advantage over the market competitors. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 39 of 55 Roanoke VA COMPETITOR RATE MATRIX PROPERTY Rent A Space Blue Ridge Self Storage Starkey Road Self Storage Allstore Virginia Varsity Self Storage Greenway Self Storage Average PROPERTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 NON CLIMATE CONTROL 5 5x10+f 10x10 i I 10x15 �10i 20 0.00 $ _ 91.00 $ 126.00 $ 150.00 $ 50.00 $ _ 80.00 $ 110.00 $ 136.00 $ 0.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 125.00 $ 0.00 $ _ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 61.00 $ _ 91.00 $ 129.00 $ 154.00 $ 0.00 $ 50.00 $ 80.00 $ 0.00 $ 55.50 $ _ 78.40 $ 109.00 $ 141.25 $ I I I CLIMATE CONTROL 5 x 5 5x10 10x10 175.00 158.00 155.00 0.00 197.00 0.00 171.25 Rent A Space 1 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Blue Ridge Self Storage 2 $ 0.00 $ 92.00 $ 132.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Starkey Road Self Storage 3 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Allstore 4 $ 0.00 $ 95.00 $ 120.00 $ 0.00 $ 173.00 Virginia Varsity Self Storage 5 $ 0.00 $ 121.00 $ 165.00 $ 219.00 $ 0.00 Greenway Self Storage 6 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Average $ 0.00 $ 102.67 $ 139.00 $ 219.00 $ 173.00 Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 40 of 55 Roanoke VA MARKET PRICING Monthly Pricing -rill Units 0 5x5 * 5x10 011000 O 10x15 910x20 139.85 130.00 Bn 120_CC 0 CV 100.00 r CD 90.00 In e 90.00 ti 70.00 0 2 60-00 50.00 45 15 Jul 2017 Source: Union Realtime Sep 2017 Nov 2017 Jan 2018 Mar 2018 May 2018 Date Aug 2018 Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 41 of 55 i F- 2 Z D 0 W 0 Z W 0 W w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 C M 0 0 0 0 O � M O O N � 4- 1,- 4- O J L� H v F- I O LO 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 (O ti O M (O m— N M LO CM (O W o 0 0 Q M lfl O I 0- U) U) LL 0 0 I O O O O (n N "t O O Z J Q O v v v v v v O O O O O O O LO LO 0 0 0 LO O LO 0 0 0 LO ti ti O O O W LL CO (O CO O (O N O N O is ) O a W — - N Lf) I -e N c I I I .— \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LLo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JQ N LO O r- c N O � CO ti (O (O U. 00 O�IIIIIIIIIII L L L L L L O O O O O O L L L L L L O O O O O O O O O O O O W LL W W W W O O O O O O L L L L L L LL LL LL LL LL LL Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q- ::) ::) ::) ::) �) �) D LL LL LL LL LL LL W 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 V W N N N N N N N N N N N N aCLo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c c c c c c c c c c c O O O O O O O O O O O O U U U U U U U U U U U U LB LB LB LB LB LB LB LB LB LB LB LB U U U U U U U U U U U U I I I I I I I I I I I LLLO C) LO0 0 0 0 0 0 (Y N Ln ti OD LO ON N LO ti O O I I ICN cnI I I I I I I I I I I I I LO O LO O LO O LO O O O LO O — — — — N — — — — N N x x x x x x x x x x x x �n Lo Lo Lo O O O Lo Lo LoO O O r- — — — Ln Ln O N cu w co Q- 00 0 N hA c 0 co O 4- -I O c -I cu w O v cu Q CU 2 L 0 i 0 [TO 0 LL L I CL Q LL D � � J H O OLM LM 0 _ F- H O 0 0 cn _ U U C9 H Z W = =_ w Ln Ln O N cu w co Q- 00 0 N hA c 0 co O 4- -I O c -I cu w O v cu Q CU Ln Ln 0 m v to a ■x V) i i 4w Ln i i _O _O _O i O O O O O O LL O -L- LL LL w LL w LL w 00 p O LL O LL O LL LL. i i CL CL CL CL CL CL O LL — i i i a) CL CLCL CL CL 4- Ln i LL LL LL CL 70 70 a) 70 a)a) LL -0a) 70 70 70 a) 70 (1)0 � 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 OL - C C C — C C C C C U U U 0 C U U U U O U D U O � U U N � � � O 4 (1) a)ra m===� ry m E ra E ra E ra E ■ fu E E U U U E v U U U /(� U U U O Ln O O U U ^ O Ln O O W /A O N O O CD Ln Lf) m ,--i O +--i ,--i Lf) �--i N O N N O C) O 1-1 O + q O +--1 + q Lf) +--1 N O N 0 Ln x 'q x 'q x X X X Ln x '� x X X X X O O O ^ O O O m ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ❑ ■ ® ❑ OO cnV O O U O L m 0 cr 0 Ln Ln 0 m v to a O iii iV) O O O LL LL LL OO OO OOO 0O L 0 LL LL LL LL 0 LL i i Q Q CL LL � � a) a) Q Q Q LLO 4- ' Q Q Q =)D D }, i LL LL LL IL LL 7o 70 70 70 0 O O O 0 � O O O O O O — O 0 � U U U C U U UU �OU U � � � OU W � � O U (U (U ra ra ra U � ra ra ra ' a a E E E a E E E E V ru E E u u 0 E -—u u u L 'vi v v v vLn O Ln i i N O 1-1 1-1 N O N Ln I� O 111 O N Ln O O Ln O O Ln 1-1 1-1 N O +--1 +--1 N Ln 1-11-11-4x x x Ln ' x x x x Ln n n O O O n n ^ O O O LLLL❑ m O V D timO *t Ln Ln 0 v a,o a 00 0 N 0 to C O N 0 Co L O to Ca L O Y L Co Q L d i an N c E •� L CL L O w Q. 4s w m i C co (0 E O x Q � v 3 O s s 4- _ O O c an O ___ Gl rn E 4' (0 Ln Ln 0 Ln cu w co Q- 00 00 ci 0 N O O 0 Co 0 0 cu w m O v cu L (o O_ CU Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 0) 0) 0) 07 07 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C C 00 — CO 00 — LO 0) N qqt 0) N W N — — — N 0) 0) � a 0 0 0 0 co co Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Ef} Q9, Q Q \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 100, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ 0 0 0 \ 0 LyJ CO I� CO N '--t (O '--t co I- O O M (O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N LO Nt "t O I` N N I'- O I'- O O w N N N N W c ) ai c0 0 c'i w c'i O I� c0 cYi c0 c0 c0 (O HN a N N N LL `` y ««««««««««««► Q9, Q9 I( Nt LO (O NI'* N Nt w N O NNt O M M M W (p LO Nt N O LO O w w Il- 00 (O U) CO O CO 00 0 J O OLr M I— -- -- O I` C 0 LLJ '14 I` -- L6 LO CIJ 00 co o M 000 N M N a0 N W� 00 N N a i i i i i i i i i i i l I� LU w W Q' IQq, 0 LU z LU NwN L7. L L L L L L L LO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LL O O O O O O O O O O O O L LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 }w y W LL LL LL LL LL LL U a a a a a a aco L L L L L L L L L L L L O C C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U F- LU w co co co co co co co co co co co co U U U U U U U U U U U U v v a U- LO O 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 O N LO I,- O 0 O N LO I,- O LO O CY co — — N N W N x x x x x x x x x x x x N LO LO LO O O O Un Un LO O O O tt - - - - - - an N c E •� L CL L O w Q. 4s w m i C co (0 E O x Q � v 3 O s s 4- _ O O c an O ___ Gl rn E 4' (0 Ln Ln 0 Ln cu w co Q- 00 00 ci 0 N O O 0 Co 0 0 cu w m O v cu L (o O_ CU i c H � N a.., E V � CD H � H O s E c %1.- 0 0 �^ h y � � r 3 a, ai �+ 3 Q. ai X ai 0 -0 to i r (V E o E N 0 � V aJ Ln Ln •N � 0 f0 a..1 H , s s E 4� 4� v %I.- L 0 0 fC 0 E E N c ar 0 ar 3 0 � � v 0 a 0 L � Ln aj L Q. oo s 4-0 ' N 1 to Qi O CL X L S 4� E 0 Q 4� r- �^ ' O 0 v CL 4� a, o E 0 to 0 i s ai L ar Q X w E 0 V 41 s c 0 41s 0 H E H s41 41 s w 0 0 s �i i Ln Ln O cu w co Q. O m — N G - W M Ln Ln c0 c0 O mm O Il- O� N O ko ko I c0 O� N ko Ln O 01 Il O� c0 O� I -M Ln N Ln M W I� N cc M 01 ko O I, m M M n l0 l0 l0 M W M ko I, m ko � Ln ko — N W M — M O O 00 ti o 0 ti ti iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� c0 vl Ln .--i m n ko ko M M N .--i I" Ln .--I Ln O I� W m O� O� W Il W n ko � M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln O� � ccM .--� ko Il N O Ln Ln ti N ti Ln ti ti ri N ti m Ln I" O m m N ko 0 iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M I, Ln. .--I Ln O. I� W m O� O� W Il W n ko �. M Ln. m O .--I Ln Ln O� c0. M. .--i ko n N O C. Ln . Ln . . . . Ln . . . . Ln O � o m `-' m N ko l0 ,y ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M I, Ln .--I Ln O I� W m O� O� W Il W n ko � M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln O� c0 M .--i ko n N O Ln Ln v N ti m ti ti ri N ti ("j m I, O c m `-' m N ko iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M I, Ln .--I Ln O I� W m O� O� W Il W n ko � M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln O� c0 M .--i ko n N O Ln Ln v N ti m ti ti ri N ti m Ln I, O c m m N ko iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M I, Ln .--I Ln O I� W m O� O� W Il W n ko � M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln O� � ccM .--� ko Il N O Ln Ln ti N ti Ln ti ti r" N ti m Ln I, O c m `-' m N ko ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M I, Ln .--I Ln O Il W m O� O� W Il W n ko � M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln O� c0 M .--i ko n N O Ln Ln ti N ti m ti ti ri N ti m Ln I, O c m `-' m N ko i, iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--i c0 Ln Ln .--i m n ko ko M M N T .--i T I, Ln .--I Ln O rl W m m m W n W n ko M Ln m O .--I Ln Ln m lzl ccM .--� ko rl N O LnLn ti N ti m ti ti r, N ti m Ln I, O c m `-' m N ko iff � iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M N T I, Ln .--i Ln O I, 00 m m m 00 n 00 I, ko Ln Ln m O — Ln Ln O� c0 M ko N Lf) ti N ti Lf) ti ti ri N ti ("j Lf) O � o m m `-' m N l0 ko ,y iff � iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I, ko ko M M N T.--� I, Ln .--i Ln O Il 00 m O� O� 00 Il 00 I, lO � M Ln m O — Ln Ln O� c0 M .--i ko n N O Ln Ln ti N ti Ln ti ti ri N ti m Ln I, O m m N ko 0 ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln .--I m I, ko ko M M N .--� I, Ln .--i Ln O Il 00 m O� O� 00 Il 00 I, lO � M Ln m O — Ln Ln O� c0 M .--i ko n N O Ln Ln ti N ti Ln ti ti ri N ti m Ln I, O o m `-' m N ko y iff � iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff ko 00 .--� W l.f) Ln m I" ko ko M M I, Ln .--I Ln (D I, W m m m W n W n ko — Ln Ln m (D .--I Ln Ln m � W M — ko I, N O Lf) Lf) ti N ti Ln - - ri N ti ("j Lf) I� O c, o m `-' m N ko if} m ii-} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} if} ko 00.--� W l.f) Ln .--I m I" ko ko M M N .--� I, Ln .--i Ln O Il 00 m O� O� 00 Il 00 I, lO � Ln Ln m O — Ln Ln O� � W M .--� ko Il- N O Ln Ln ti N ti Ln ti ti ri N ti m Lf) rl O m m N ko 'i 0 iffCDiff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff iff e d d L {i V O w O =�+ £LU L C C ca M Ch d O a d f ED a£i A° o7i 4LU y m 4)qj CD y W d J L A d d O 0 O 3 C s NV 'c H lY !N y w 20. 10 C H w c7 oC cB a I i f a oC a B c H � N a.., E V � CD H � H O s E c %1.- 0 0 �^ h y � � r 3 a, ai �+ 3 Q. ai X ai 0 -0 to i r (V E o E N 0 � V aJ Ln Ln •N � 0 f0 a..1 H , s s E 4� 4� v %I.- L 0 0 fC 0 E E N c ar 0 ar 3 0 � � v 0 a 0 L � Ln aj L Q. oo s 4-0 ' N 1 to Qi O CL X L S 4� E 0 Q 4� r- �^ ' O 0 v CL 4� a, o E 0 to 0 i s ai L ar Q X w E 0 V 41 s c 0 41s 0 H E H s41 41 s w 0 0 s �i i Ln Ln O cu w co Q. § k k k k k k m % 24. o zi 0 k c ° � " ■ � ■ � CL� 2 7 2 § R b 2 ■ % J; 2 m 0 s o 2 k > q § Lm � § ƒ ° C3 v w m a o J § . 4. o :E2 9 % - 5 ■ w § J ƒ E / % c CL 2 4. � u o § 2 E 7 4. v u Ul ( ° � 4 @ a ■ k c § � o - E [ 2 [ / § 0 a E 2 o c a 4.> u k ƒ k J 0 ow 'E 2 k $ � @ u 2 u k / a 0 t 2 r ° \ : a @ 2 E E ° o q \ O E @ "s m(v > / k) 2 0 Ln C . § ■ . 2 u § ■ E E " 3 %. k 2 2 Rx ■ E to § E c E c _ k 2 CL f3 (E r $ w 0 k k � r � 41 k§° � k o o k 4� � § ° co § k $2 g $ g o % ' Ln 4� Ln § > § 3 C 0 § CL s w § u k W C § @ E \ 0> 2 2 X W rr CL 0 w w $ 2 _ Roanoke VA OPERATIONS/MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS • Signage. We cannot over-estimate the value of highly visible, colorful signage. Self -storage is primarily a retail business and proper signage is critical. We recommend that the reader consider maximizing the amount of signage allowed: o 'Self Storage' should be the largest words on the sign o Facility phone number in large numerals o Manual reader boards are not recommended, but if the budget allows, an electronic reader board can be used to point out specials, community events, time & temperature, etc. o We highly recommend that the developer immediately create a 'Coming Soon!' sign on the property with an 800# to begin monitoring demand and creating a 'pre -leasing 'energy. Such a sign might also work to discourage any potential new self storage developments in the subject market. o The developer might consider having a third party call center answer the 'Coming Soon' phone number, especially as the opening of the facility becomes imminent and pre -leasing opportunities start to happen. • Trucks. There is a strong relationship between self -storage and truck rentals indicated by the large percentage of customers who rent trucks when moving into and out of self -storage (+/- 25%). We recommend that the developer consider adding Uhaul rental trucks or securing an On the Move truck at the subject site. o On the Move CJ Steen 800-645-9940 www.onthemovetrucks.com o Uhau1800-528-0361 vw.uhaul.corn/dealer • Call Center. Already a proven strategy among the big boys in the U.S. marketplace, the call center concept is noted as one of the greatest competitive advantages in all of self -storage. Self - storage operators cannot afford to miss prospective customer inquiries and will not miss those calls by using a third party call center. We are surprised that in 2016 that any existing self -storage facility does not use a call center. The call center provides self -storage owners with a remote level of services that range from answering all facility calls, rollover facility calls that give managers the opportunity to answer first, and after -hour facility calls. Moreover, call centers can handle all incoming calls with 24/7 options. The strategy allows the manager to focus on operational duties, marketing, and face -to face customer service. The value of every rental is far too high to trust to an answering machine. Too many studies indicate that potential customers simply will not leave a message and continue to call through the Yellow Pages or various web sites (or other marketing sources) until they are able to reach someone. Self storage centers are at a clear marketing disadvantage in their marketing efforts by not using a call center. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 48 of 55 Roanoke VA o The call center answers the phone when the manager can't (usually afterthe third or fourth ring as well as before and after the facility office closes) o The calls transfer seamlessly to the call center and oftentimes the customer doesn't know they have reached a call center. o The call center agent can take a reservation, take a payment, answer questions about the account, etc. o The call center will increase rentals and increase customer service. o Managers have to be trained to effectively utilize the benefits of a call center. Self Storage Call Center we highly recommend. • XPS — Mike Roberts 972-865-4312 www.xpsusa.com • State -of -the -Art Security. The developer should make no compromises insecurity technology. o Individual door alarms are not recommended for this facility. o Access controlled facility entry o Recorded security surveillance o A large number of security cameras o Large security camera monitors placed behind the sales counter so that customers can see that the facility is being monitored. o We highly recommend contacting PTI Security Systems, 800-523-9504 www.ptisecurity.com • Tenant Goods Insurance. The facility should offer the benefit of pay -with -payment tenant goods insurance to the tenants. o Tenant goods insurance is designed to protect tenant goods for various maladies typically including theft and natural disasters. o We highly recommend contacting the following tenant insurance companies: ■ Bader Company—Tim Parnell 888-223-3726 www.baderco.com ■ StoreSmart Insurance — Michael Rhoads 888-545-7627 www.storsmartinsurance.com • Manager considerations. There are few businesses as 'manager -centric' as the self -storage business. Oftentimes customers won't know the name of the facility but will know the name of the manager. While an established, stabilized facility can 'make do' with a sub -par manager, a facility in lease -up or a challenging market cannot. We believe it would be difficult to implement most if not all of the recommendations with a subpar manager. We highly recommend that the developer implement an intensive hiring and training program. o Given the increased importance of the Internet and email as a marketing source to attract customers, it has also shifted the dynamics of self -storage managers. No longer can they be merely efficient at renting space in person or on the phone. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 49 of 55 Roanoke VA o Self -storage is a sales business. Managers must have the skills to professional 'sell' prospects on renting and on paying their rent. o The professionalism and appearance of the on-site manager should match or be superior to the facility itself ('a nice facility with a poor manager is a poor facility'). o We would recommend not including on-site living quarters and employing a professional manager that does not live on site. o The manager for this facility needs to be professional, outgoing, have the ability to market and represent the facility in the community. o It's understood industry -wide that today's self -storage managers must be skilled professionals; gone is the caretaker role of the past. This type of manager has gone the way of first -generation facilities that served as a placeholder until the land could be used for some higher purpose. Fittingly, the job benefits enjoyed by self -storage managers have grown in correlation with their required talents and abilities. • We highly recommend contacting Brett Copper, Self Storage 101 VP of Marketing and Manager Training, for a complete description of our manager training opportunities, including webinars, books and videos and in-person training sessions and workshops. Consideration should also be given to employing the services of a professional third party management company. We highly recommend contacting the following companies to discuss their third party management program: Cubesmart Guy Middlebrooks 610-535-5000 www.cubesmart.com • Extra Space Noah Springer 801-365-4600 www.extraspace.com • Life Storage Dale Payne 877-270-4665 vww.undebobsmanagement.corn • Absolute Management Michael Haugh 901-737-7336 www.absolutemgmt.com • Storage Asset Management Alyssa Quill 717-779-0044 www.storageassetmanagement.com • StorQuest Brenda Scarborough 813-380-5015 www.storguest.com • Marketing Plan: The developer should immediately employ a consultant to develop a complete and detailed marketing plan for the store. The marketing plan should include many of the suggestions listed including a direct mail 'drip' campaign to local businesses and a 'declutter sale ready' service for realtors. The marketing plan should give specific costs and implementation strategies. • Sales Management: A specific plan for monitoring on-site sales effectiveness and retail sales should be a strong component of the management plan. • Extended Access Hours: The store should offer extended access hours and, commensurate with the extended access, increased security. The recommended gate hours are 6:00 am to 10:00 pm, seven days a week. Commercial tenants should be offered extended hours as needed. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 50 of 55 Roanoke VA • 7 Day -Per -Week Office Hours: The office should be open seven days per week. Some of the market competitors are not open on Sundays but the subject property should have some Sunday hours at least during the lease -up process. The recommended office hours are 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sundays. During lease -up late hours on Friday until 7:00 p.m. are suggested. o A recent retail organization's study indicated that a large percentage of people shop between 6pm and Bpm. • Internet Strategy: Today, more and more self -storage owners are continuing to incorporate self- service into their website storefronts to compete for added rentals. Consumers are carrying around smartphones—business tools in the palms of their hands. And as a result, storage companies with optimized websites are enjoying great success by renting units on -demand. For new online tenants, it is a welcome reprieve from the task of visiting a store during office hours and dealing with all the paperwork in person. Should this trend continue, facilities that dismiss the use of a functional website will find themselves unable to serve and engage a broader customer base through Web and mobile channels. In fact, current case studies reveal how online storage shoppers are responding when facilities implement a personalized Web -mobile rental channel. The Marketing plan should have an E -Commerce component and should deploy a strong Internet presence. The E -Commerce strategy should include: o Website ■ Easy to navigate ■ Clear 'call to action' ■ 'clutter -free' o On-line rental capability ■ Allows potential customers to conduct business with you when you are not open ■ Research clearly indicates this is a highly desirable service for customers. o Search engine optimization ■ It is important that facility's website ranked consistently high among web searches within the subject market o On-line payment options ■ Credit cards ■ Debit cards ■ ACH o Link to call center during business hours ■ Call center can implement 'live chat' for facility o Real-time inventory management ■ Accurate availability. • We highly recommend contacting Chris Baird at Automatit, 520-293-4608 www.automatit.net and Syrasoft Mark Somers 315-236-5496, www.syrasoft.com. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 51 of 55 Roanoke VA • Kiosk Payment Center. We recommend that the developer consider adding a kiosk to the subject facility. The kiosk extends the reach of customer acquisition and customer service. In an industry that typically serves customers in person between the hours of 9 to 5, incremental sales and reduced labor costs represent the top drivers that motivate owners to integrate self-service kiosks. In turn, the reality of losing recurring business to nearby competitors marks the kiosk as one of the most prominent strategic solutions. This is because the kiosk is always onsite to take care of a new renter—keeping a facility open when others in the marketplace are closed. o The kiosk has several benefits: ■ Low cost for the initial investment. ■ Extends rental hours when tied to one of the third party call centers. ■ Reduces staff activities and may allow for reduction of operating hours. ■ Creates a unique marketing and sales position for the subject facility. ■ Kiosks give owners and operators the ability to conduct business both during and outside of normal office hours, thereby helping to maximize income for self -storage facilities. o We recommend that the developer contact Advanced Kiosks about their self -storage kiosks; Margo Bowie, 603-865-1000, www.advancedkiosks.com. • USP: The store should have a strong Unique Selling Proposition to set it apart from the competition. o Payment and Rental Kiosk o Free rental truck with move -in. o Climate controlled units. o Complete selection of moving and packing supplies. • Affiliations to Gain Sales: The developer should consider Preferred Partner Programs to increase traffic. o Apartment managers o Home Owner's Associations o Pizza Delivery stores o Realtors • Guerilla Marketing: The Marketing Plan should address a direct sales effort to area businesses and multi -family communities. • Direct Marketing and Community Involvement: The store managers should be active in the local Chamber of Commerce. Self -storage is a local business that relies on referrals. Chamber members know many people in the community. • Direct Mail Campaign: The Marketing Plan should identify the targets, frequency and nature of a direct mail campaign. The plan may or may not include Val-pak recommendations. • Collateral Materials: Hire a self -storage marketing consultant to create a logo, brochures, collateral, web page, property signs, etc. The developer can contact Brett Copper at Self Storage 101, 205-643-0712, the Self Storage Association or the Virginia Self Storage Association for recommendations. • Competitor Referral Program: A program to receive referrals from competitors should be developed. • Tenant Retention Program: A specific program for tenant retention should be developed as part of the management plan. • 828 Marketing: A specific marketing effort to attract commercial customers should be presented. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 52 of 55 Roanoke VA • Custodial Management: Commit to keeping the property "clean and green." There is longstanding value to keeping the property in exceptional condition. Landscaping doesn't need to be elaborate, just well-maintained. • Management Software: The subject facility should use a web -based management software system. The newer programs now available to the self -storage industry allow owner -operators to review reports and on-site activities in real time and the array of reports allows for more effective oversight of the facility. Owners can more readily review various rent change scenarios, check for rent allowances and discounts and implement tenant rent increases, all without necessarily engaging the onsite manager. (We are not recommending that all functions, such as rent increases, be implemented without manager 'buy -in.) We highly recommend contacting the following companies about their management software programs: • Syrasoft Mark Somers 315-236-5496, www.syrasoft.com • storEdge Austin Jones 913-954-4110, www.storedge.com • WebSelfStorage Toni Colasso 866-693-6683 www.webselfstorage.com • Sitelink Dave McCormack 919-865-0789, ext 1 www.sitelink.com Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 53 of 55 Roanoke VA Bob Copper SELF 141 Self Storage 101 Narrows Point Court j Birmingham, AL 35242 STC? PAGE b We know storage. office: 866-269-1311 Fax: 866-398-5859 www.seIfstorage101.com Consultant Qualifications: 2003 -Present Owner, Partner in Charge, Self Storage 101 i Founder of Self Storage 101, the industry's leading consultancy firm specializing in Development and Market Feasibility, Operational Improvement and Marketing Implementation. Bob has worked with 100's of independent owners and operators to assist in making informed and profitable decisions in all aspects of self -storage. He has developed, own and managed his own facilities and so has a unique perspective that easily relates to those operators he has consulted with over the years. Bob and the Team at Self Storage 101 specialize in: • Market and Feasibility Studies • Acquisition Due Diligence Projects • Facility Operational Auditing • Owner, Operator and Manager Training Bob has authored a number of highly popular books and training manuals related to self storage and is a regular contributor to most of the industry trade journals. He is a regular speaker at national, regional and local self storage meetings and conventions. 2001-2004 Regional Manager, Metro Storage LLC Oversaw three district managers in four states for Metro Storage, one of the largest operators of self storage facilities in the US. Had complete P&L responsibility as well as asset management, portfolio growth, marketing and adding value to the assets. Developed training programs and assisted district managers with personnel decisions and financial statement reviews. 1998-2001 District Manager, Public Storage Successfully managed the largest Public Storage district in the country (17 properties). Took over two under -performing districts and turned them into some of the highest performing districts. Responsible for all personnel management, expense control, manager training, property management and operational reporting. Involved in several acquisitions and new -store openings. Education: Stetson University, 1979-1983 Professional References gladly provided upon request. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 54 of 55 Roanoke VA Bill Copper Self Storage 101 SELF 406 Oliver Approach STQRAGE 101 Johnson City, TN 37601 Cell 828-381-5631 We know storage -www. selfstorage101.com Consultant Qualifications: 2006 -Present Consultant, Self Storage 101 Field Auditor and Data Analyst with Self Storage 101, the industry's leading consultancy firm specializing in Development and Market Feasibility, Operational Improvement, and Marketing Implementation. Bill has worked with dozens of independent owners and operators to assist in making informed and profitable decisions in all aspects of self -storage. Bill has developed and implemented systems for analyzing and collecting relevant data to: • Improve operational efficiency • Measure operational effectiveness • Assist in determining project viability • Measure Capital Rate of Return on acquisition projects Bill has worked closely with clients and industry vendors to aid in market research and development viability for a large number of independent -owner and institutional self storage projects: • Provide comprehensive market data and analysis to determine unmet demand or over -supply in specific markets • Participated in a number of community neighborhood meetings, municipal presentations and investment group conferences to provide anecdotal and empirical evidence regarding market demand and viability of specific self storage projects • Prepared a large number of complete bank package or self storage feasibility studies, documenting "develop or not develop" recommendations Education: Stetson University, 1980-1984 Professional References gladly provided upon request. Prepared by Self Storage 101 for B Delong 02018 Page 55 of 55 Plan Review Comments Project Name Tax Number Date - SME GENERAL: General Notes 1. All construction methods and materials shall conform to the latest WVWA Design and Construction Standards 2. The contractor or developer is required to notify the Western Virginia Water Authority in writing at least three (3) days prior to any construction. Please contact Mark Sink at 537-3460. 3. All work shall be subject to inspection by the Western Virginia Water Authority 4. Field corrections shall be approved by the Western Virginia Water Authority prior to such construction. 5. Please show all existing utilities on the plan. 6. The contractor shall maintain a minimum of 18" clearance vertically and 2' minimum horizontally from outside of pipe to outside of pipe at all water, sanitary sewer crossings of any other utilities. Where this cannot be achieved additional measures in accordance with WVWA standards shall be enforced. 7. Any existing appurtenances should be adjusted to grade and new frame and covers installed where required 8. It is the contractor's responsibility to have all existing utilities located and potholed to verify locations. This plan review does not remove the contractor's responsibility to relocate any existing conflicts found during construction. Sewer Notes — Add the following All sanitary sewer connections to existing lines shall be coordinated with and performed by the Western Virginia Water Authority. 1. All water and sanitary sewer facilities are to be installed according to the Western Virginia Water Authority Design and Construction Standards. • Water Notes — Add the following 1. All water connections to existing lines shall be coordinated with and performed by the Western Virginia Water Authority. 2. All water and sanitary sewer facilities are to be installed according to the Western Virginia Water Authority Design and Construction Standards SHEET X OF X Obtain and availability letter, and include the availability letter number in the space provided under water notes. Please add the following note: "Contractor to furnish and install tapping sleeve and valve, tap to be made by WVWA. Contractor shall be responsible for excavation and shoring per OSHA regulations." Please add the following note: "The water service for this project will require a concrete vault. Please contact Clear Flow at (540) 942-3300 to order the vault. The Applicant is responsible for payment, delivery and coordination of the vault, and installation of the water service between the Authority main and the vault including the tapping sleeve and valve. Contractor to excavate and install tapping sleeve and valve, the wet tap will be made by the Authority upon payment and scheduling." Please add the following note: "Sanitary sewer tap to existing manhole to be made by Contractor. Manhole connection must be cored with a boot installed." Please add the following note: "Contractor to furnish and install tapping sleeve and valve, tap to be made by WVWA. Contractor shall be responsible for excavation and shoring per OSHA regulations." Show at all proposed fire hydrants the static pressure (psi) and fire flow (gpm) with 20 psi residual. Provide a table of lateral elevations at service cleanouts and minimum building sewer elevations. Grease interceptor shall be inspected and approved by Western Virginia Water Authority prior to site receiving water service connection. Forty-eight (48) hours prior to installation, the contractor shall complete the following: 1. Submit shop drawings to Cassie Altice, 601 S. Jefferson Street, Suite 300, Roanoke, VA 24011 2. Call (540) 537-3460 to schedule grease interceptor inspection. The inspection shall occur prior to the contractor covering the grease interceptor. 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY (WVWA) AVAILABLE AT WWW.WESTERNVAWATER.ORG OR BY CONTACTING THE AUTHORITY AT 540-853-5700. THE PROJECT SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION'S STANDARDS AND OTHER AGENCY STANDARDS (E.G., VDOT, DEQ, DCR, VDH, ETC.) WHERE APPLICABLE. Please provide written response to all review comments. Plan Review Comments Review PZ -1802964 Roanoke County 11-28-18 1. All construction methods and materials shall conform to the latest WVWA Design and Construction Standards. 2. Please see a copy of attached standard WVWA comments to include in your plan set. 3. The current building layout is encroaching on the existing sewer main and corresponding easement. The building footprint and any other structures may not be constructed in the existing easement. 4. Based on our as built information, the existing water main does not currently extend to property and will need to be extended by developer. 5. Fixture counts for the proposed building shall be submitted and reviewed to size meter and set any WVWA availability fees. 6. Any fire flow requirements for this facility will need to be properly sized and designed by the developer. 7. All water and sanitary sewer facilities are to be installed according to the Western Virginia Water Authority Design and Construction Standards. 8. Once site plans are submitted, the WVWA will review and additional comments maybe added. C-2 District Regulations SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -Family Dwelling * Two -Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * C-2 District Regulations Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary Family Day Care Home Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Antique Shops Automobile Dealership Automobile Repair Services, Minor Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Bed and Breakfast * 2 Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General 3 C-2 District Regulations C-2 District Regulations Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Dance Hall Cl C-2 District Regulations Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213- 15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16) See. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). 6i C-2 District Regulations b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. Cel C-2 District Regulations (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) Article I — General Provisions SEC. 30-19. SPECIAL USE PERMITS; APPLICABILITY AND PURPOSE. (A) The procedures and standards contained in this section shall apply to all uses specifically permitted as special uses in the district regulations found elsewhere in this ordinance. (B) This category of uses known as special uses is established in recognition that in addition to uses permitted by right, certain uses may, depending upon their scale, design, location, and conditions imposed by the board, be compatible with existing and future uses in a district. (C) The review and subsequent approval or disapproval of a special use permit by the board shall be considered a legislative act, and shall be governed by the procedures thereof. Sec. 30-19-1. General Standards. (A) The administrator shall not accept a special use permit application for a lot or parcel that does not comply with the minimum requirements contained in article IV, use and design standards, for that use. In such situations, the applicant shall first seek a variance from the board of zoning appeals. If a variance is granted, the administrator shall thereafter accept the special use permit application for the consideration of the commission and board. (B) No special use permit shall be issued except upon a finding of the board that in addition to conformity with any standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards, the proposed special use conforms with the following general standards. These standards shall be met either by the proposal made in the original special use permit application, or by the proposal as modified or amended as part of the review of the application by the commission and the board: The proposal as submitted or modified shall conform to the comprehensive plan of the county, or to specific elements of the plan, and to official county policies adopted in relation thereto, including the purposes of the zoning ordinance. 2. The proposal as submitted or modified shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community. Adverse impact shall be evaluated with consideration to items such as, but not limited to, traffic congestion, noise, lights, dust, drainage, water quality, air quality, odor, fumes and vibrations. In considering impacts, due regard shall be given to the timing of the operation, site design, access, screening, or other matters which might be regulated to mitigate adverse impact. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 1, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1£, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-19-2. Application Requirements. (A) An application for a special use permit may be initiated by: Article I — General Provisions Resolution of the board, or; 2. Motion of the commission, or; Petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's written consent, or the owner's agent, of the property for which a special use permit is requested. (B) The applicant for a special use permit shall provide at the time of application, information and or data to demonstrate that the proposed use will be in harmony with the purposes of the specific zoning district in which it will be located. Further, the applicant shall have the responsibility to demonstrate that the proposed use will have minimum adverse impact on adjoining property and the surrounding neighborhood in terms of public health, safety, or general welfare. (C) All applications submitted for special use permits shall show the nature and extent of the proposed use and development. If the proposed development is to be constructed in phases, all phases shall be shown at the time of the original application. The applicant shall have the responsibility to show that the proposal meets all of the applicable specific and general standards for the use. (D) The administrator shall establish and maintain the special use permit application materials. At a minimum these materials shall require the submittal of a concept plan. Standards for concept plans are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the department of community development. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § ld., 4-27-99) Sec. 30-19-3. Review and Action. (A) The department of community development shall review all special use permit applications submitted. This review shall evaluate the proposal against the comprehensive plan and the specific and general standards for the requested use. The department shall make a report of its findings to the commission. This report shall contain all information pertinent to the evaluation of the request. (B) The commission shall review and make recommendations to the board concerning the approval or disapproval of any special use permit. No such recommendation shall be made until after a public hearing is held in accordance with section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. Posting of the property shall be in accord with section 30- 14-3 of this ordinance. The commission shall base its recommendation upon the review of the submitted application materials, the specific and general criteria for the special use, public comment received at the hearing, and the information and evaluation of the department of community development. In making a recommendation to the board, the commission may recommend any conditions necessary to insure that the proposal meets the specific and general standards for the proposed use. Any such conditions shall be 2 Article I — General Provisions related to the design, scale, use, or operation of the proposed special use. Where warranted, for the purpose of compliance with the general standards for special uses, such conditions may exceed the specific standards for the use found elsewhere in this ordinance. (C) The board may grant or deny any applicant a special use permit after notice is given and a public hearing is held in accordance with section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. No action on any special use permit shall be taken until the board has received the recommendation of the planning commission. In granting a special use permit, the board may attach any conditions necessary to insure that the proposal meets the specific and general standards for the proposed use. Any such conditions shall be related to the: (1) Design, (2) Scale, (3) Use, or (4) Operation of the proposed special use. Where warranted, for the purpose of compliance with the general standards for special uses, such conditions may exceed the specific standards for the use found elsewhere in this ordinance. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § la., d., e., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) See. 30-19-4. Time Limitations. (A) Within ninety (90) days from the date that the proposed special use permit application is referred to the commission, unless a longer period shall have been established by mutual agreement between the board and the commission in a particular case, the commission shall review the proposed application and report its findings and recommendation to the board along with any appropriate explanatory materials. Failure of the commission to report to the board within ninety (90) days shall be deemed a recommendation of approval. If the commission does not report within ninety (90) days, the board may act on the application without the recommendation of the commission. (B) The board shall hold a public hearing and approve or deny any special use permit application within twelve (12) months after receiving the commission's recommendation. Failure to act on any permit within this twelve-month period shall be deemed denial of the permit. (C) A special use permit application may be put on hold upon written request of the applicant at any time. This hold shall not exceed six (6) months. The applicant shall make a written request to the zoning administrator to reactivate the special use permit application. Should the application not be reactivated, it shall be considered withdrawn and subject to the requirements of (F) below. Article I — General Provisions (D) Any special use permit granted shall be null and void two (2) years after approval by the board if the use or development authorized by the permit is not commenced to a degree that, in the opinion of the administrator, clearly establishes the intent to utilize the granted special use permit in a period of time deemed reasonable for the type and scope of improvements involved. (E) Special uses which are approved by the board shall run with the land, except that Activities or uses approved by a special use permit which are discontinued for a period of more than two (2) consecutive years shall not be reestablished on the same property unless a new special use permit is issued in accord with this ordinance. 2. A special use permit shall be void, if at the time of the commencement of the authorized use, activity, or structure, the site for which the permit has been granted contains other uses or activities not in place at the time of the issuance of the special use permit. (F) If any special use permit application is withdrawn at the request of the applicant subsequent to the commission's recommendation on the permit, or if the board denies any application submitted for its review, the county shall not consider any application for the same special use, on the same property, within one year of the permit withdrawal or the board's action. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) M Article I — General Provisions SEC. 30-3. PURPOSE. (A) The zoning regulations and districts set forth in this ordinance are for the general purpose of implementing the comprehensive plan of Roanoke County. They are designed to achieve the general purposes of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, and of further accomplishing the objectives of Section 15.2-2200 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. To these ends, this ordinance is designed to give reasonable consideration to each of the following purposes: Provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety from fire, flood and other dangers; 2. Reduce or prevent congestion in the public streets; Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; 4. Facilitate the provision of adequate police, fire protection, disaster evacuation, civil defense, transportation, water, sewer, flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds, recreational facilities, airports and other public requirements; Protect against destruction of, or encroachment upon historic buildings or areas; 6. Protect against one or more of the following: overcrowding of land, undue density of population in relation to the community facilities existing or available, obstruction of light or air, hazards and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss of life, health, or property from fire, flood, panic, or other hazards; 7. Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; 8. Provide for the preservation of agricultural and forestal lands; 9. Protect approach slopes and other safety areas of licensed airports; 10. Protect surface and groundwater resources, and; 11. Promote the creation and preservation of affordable housing suitable for meeting the current and future needs for the locality as well as a reasonable proportion of the current and future needs of the planning district where the locality is situated. (Ord. No. 042799-11, §§ la., £, 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. I Rif, IN, lQT w Y - 9 ESTATES AT SOUTH PEAK, LLC November 15, 2018 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2' Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of Estates at South Peak, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self= storage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, l respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely ter D. Smith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator SOUTH PEAK. RESIDENCES, LLC November 15, 2018 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2"d Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of South Peak Residences, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self - storage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, I respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely, H trDSmith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator W©ODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC November 15, 2418 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2 Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of Woodcliff Investments, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self- storage elfstorage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, 1 respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely, HuntKD. ith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator MCNEIL PROPERTIES, LLC November 15, 2018 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2"d Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of McNeil Properties, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self - storage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, I respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely, unter D. Smith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator SLATE HILL II, LLC November 15, 2018 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2nd Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of Slate Hill II, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self - storage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, I respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely, /Unter D. Smith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator SOUTH PEAK HOTEL, LLC November 15, 2018 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND EMAIL Mr. Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr., 2°d Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Venture Storage Group -- South Peak Development Project Dear Mr. Thompson, I am writing on behalf of South Peak Hotel, LLC to express our full support of Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed multi -story mini storage facility located at South Peak. We believe that the development project will meet the Roanoke Valley's growing mini -storage needs and will provide numerous economic benefits to Roanoke County, including a number of local employment opportunities, both through the design and construction phases of the project, and thereafter once the self -storage facility is operational. In addition, we believe the development project will provide convenience to local residents who are in need of a climate controlled self - storage facility positioned where it can be easily accessed on their way home from work or on their way to the grocery store. As an adjacent property owner, we have a substantial interest in the overall success of the South Peak community and its future development. We believe that Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development will only serve to strengthen South Peak overall and will be a great addition to the area. Therefore, on behalf of our organization, I respectfully request that the County support and approve Venture Storage Group, LLC's proposed development. Sincerely, Jut r D. Smith Vice Chairman Manager cc: John Murphy, Roanoke County Zoning Administrator December 31, 2018 Mr. Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning 5204 Bernard Drive Second Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 Mr. Thompson: Our company has become aware of the pending rezoning matter of the proposed South Peak storage facility with a planning commission date of January 2nd, 2019. We have reviewed the rezoning application, includ- ing staff comments and Roanoke County's overall summary. We have also researched the current and pro- posed zoning and the Community Development Authority arrangement that governs the spirit and intent of South Peak development. We are not zoning experts and will leave that matter to relevant parties and the professionals. However, as a 30 -year old homegrown business with five storage locations and a major moving company, we have as strong a grasp on storage demand as anyone in this area. Frankly, another planned storage property, especially one that would become the largest in this part of the state and inordinately large, when so much storage product is already on the way, was quite surprising. Our business recently completed a successful rezoning for our Virginia Varsity Self Storage- Starkey location that we opened in 1999. As part of our due diligence, we conducted extensive research on our own property and the southern Roanoke storage market. In learning about this proposed project, we were very surprised that yet another storage project was potentially in the pipeline after announcements of three new projects for Southern Roanoke (including one of our own). We understand the developer to be legitimate and well-regarded, but it seems unthinkable that an accurate market study was conducted to fully determine supply and demand in this market. There are no fewer than four significant new projects or expansions within close proximity to South Peak. The Pheonix Group is planning an 86,000 sf Kmart conversion within one mile of South Peak; Ft. Knox Self Storage is planning a new 72,000 sf property near Old Southwest; we are about to begin a 53,000 sf expansion of our Starkey prop- erty and will launch our first phase of a massive project at the old Graves Humphreys building on Franklin Road. This represents almost 300,000 sf of new storage product, without the South Peak storage. Zoning matters aside, if there is an overabundance of storage supply, there is a very real likelihood that this project will struggle, or worse. Contrary to popular belief, a storage business is not pre -ordained to succeed and can struggle and fail. In closing, it is our intention only to ensure that you are aware of the significant amount of new storage product that will begin hitting the market shortly. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, John D. Lugar, President Virginia Varsity Transfer and Storage 540-915-3086 2087 Apperson Drive Salem, VA 24153 2 3 u a ua U y a w *t ° waQ wd Si u - a 3S �; Uot5y4aka s o w p �rsb rs oAAet�rJ Wpee� Bandy Rd a � � rh o a ""hd unng4s w U Z } o < w YC N J f^ 0 4. xQSv�'- F -jUJ J �� 9 s� x 0 L i � -- W 3 ry 3s aAy b g i'�d p o u u u 0%Fv llaf S .m .4 nt aQ. a CJ = j } A ca -M OP� t O g3 c YJ H y .- pm a QO +R g [0 Z S N > Q O C }+ , m G a °� n394141H 5ui1 'h' cs m m a � +r in a e L Y tf. N J Cn [n N ( t!O r.. uJ Q J a } Ij as C? W 6 14 11 43 V! O X s a n LU LL N J Uun S UQ 7 z— m� UJ s C Y co �E IE x Ma °a a " O J J .SSC w .�. U S - ^T CL: 'ri.T1551h14 9° C 4 11. Z Q,d LU a a S a m ° u z ima� + m O Z a G� C j U w U w W y v 3 1. Virginia Vrit SelfStorage- Starkey Recently dose on 31acre purchase from Greenbrier Nurseries fo£expansion of this poet Theex- pansion - rasion wm begin by mid-January and include 5&000s of additional spaw or almost doubling the/z of this pop£ty. r L-11. \ ] _t� . a P) a m ;� §k 2. Kmart - Phoenix Partners have successfully rezoned the Franklin Road Kmart and plan to convert the entire 86,000 sf building into storage. Permits are pending, and preliminary construction has already begun. Projected completion- late 2019. 5 Z J° Z 1p3 I--1 N II Lrl aiI z�o��> 'T, s � W v L — — — — --- ---�-7��1'� �i I, � A•s� � I I� a w ioilll Ln o z 5 \a.w � I I (IIII 1 a � � j I I liilll I .. z 00 0 � � I I IIII a � \ cnLLJ \ I III I y1 z 559' `�- W m \\o II I I Z) I Z�� I III w I ! I I\` YV I IIII a Z x Z \ I I IIII I z ' LLJ o I III o 0 I I LL. I I IIII CO `° > i Qw ���I c QQi coca o u 0 Q \LLJ U, l I I II ,F I I III ll1 I - x I i I III II(I II II I I II Illi`l liilll I I -1� m - Hill r I / /I llljiill � � 71d Zo-des-99-ZOIdBbT8T 6MP'Q4-ZOId8bi8T\hue\Sbi8T\SIQZ\s6u nne�P\PennTna\ndel\:a n. UOISJOAUOO 2co A - CD 0 0 Cl) LL jJeAN a�oueo�j co VA'O��l C\jOueOLL dnojE) IsAluluo AljodOJd Jo -A mwG Aa N s I ALL k ap gjp k k yZ E R t - It", A, MR 411 t al" al U 1-1 1 El El 0 El El El El El I al" AR R I I I I '9 elI & 41 All I AR N' 411 11 YA, 1-1 4; 1, ap N; 11a gla 1 C4 I AR I 4" 9 10 LO LO 11 LO LO 1* C, 'a 1AR I -IR I I a el A, -11 11 1" 1 LO c2n, C'Dl .1k 11" 43; C Q 11 1; M AR I -IA I I to m Lo -IA ;I, E I,, 1 -1 -11 IN 1-1 AA I C C I I -�LL� Aa yZ "' THE RoANoKE TIMES rciairflQ.�ortr 4it News Sports Business Weather Life & Entertainment opinion In depth Customer Care obituaries Jobs Classifieds flnd4' Permit OK'd to convert former Roanoke Kmart into indoor self -storage facility By Matt Chittum matt,chittum@roanokexom 981.3331 Aug a, 701 a ft spomp" The former Kmart on Franklin Road In Roanoke was among other pig box stare locations that closed in 7017- Buy Now The Roanoke Times l kite 2017 i a Q A group of developers plans to convert the former Kmart store on Franklin Road in Roanoke to a climate -controlled indoor self -storage facility, Phoenlx Partners ULC, made up of}oe Thompson, B. Painter and Bland Painter, won approval from the Roanoke Board of Zoning Appeals on Wednesday for a special -exception permit needed to change the use of the 84,000 -square -foot building. The Kmart there, the last in Roanoke, closed in the fall. Attorney Cooper Youell, representing the developers, said they bought the property hoping to return it to use as a big box retail space or perhaps a grocery store. But, Youell said, they learned that potential tenants weren't interested because of limited market growth in the area, online sales continuing to undermine brick and mortar retail, and the fact that the bullding's front door isn't oriented toward Franklin Road. In its plans, Phoenix shows the main entrance moved to the side of the building that faces Franklin Road. The group promised dramatic facade improvements to update its 1970s architecture, along with landscaping upgrades, According to Phoenix's application, no outdoor storage will be permitted. Instead, all storage units will be accessed from the interior. Entry will be controlled by a security system that documents who comes In, and access in almost all cases will be limited to between 5 a.m. and 10 p.m., according to the application. Youell told the BZAthat because the business will require far less parking than a retail store, more than a third of the 11 -acre site could be used for outparcel development. w�llrnalii - L-�;,sz Sa. ►iceAFM Storefront • Business Intel: Wasena welcomes design studio and online shop • Busmems Intel, Subway restaurant leaves downtown Roanoke coke • Business Intel: Roanoke StarTankseeks applicants • First Baptist Church buys WSLS building in downtown Roanoke • Business Intel: Mexican restaurant opens in former fondue spot in Roanoke MedBeat ■ Med Beat Hey, Santa, check out Virginia Tech's list of naughty and nice bike helmets • Med Beat: Carillon's Code Kringle to collect gifts Sunday for children being treated for mental Illnesses • Med Beat: Harrington named interim dean of VTC medical school Med Beat: Sowhat is universal health care or 9ociahzed medicine? ■ Med Beat. Tech wins 31 million to study head injuries in women athletes M 3. Graves Humphreys - Virginia Varsity Storage, Inc. has a contract and plans to develop a major, mixed-use property with office, retail, residential and storage. The storage component will be significant and bring 83,000 sf to the market. Construction to begin in 2019. mow' y • " v k. , 'I� 3 aye 4M 9 `e VINI`IIIIA 3NONVOa dO ALO U m m n p a m a R v Noiion?J1SN00 iiOd lON b g r ,d., NVId 311S lVflld3ONOO o AHVNIVVIl32id B ONIC17inS SA3?JHdvinH S3Wd9 4 f uiSbVA VINISMA p W n 3NIl -Old SNIAIK3 O WLCL- X O wl8 s�0 =goy Z. 8 ¢ C) 0 XIX � I--cn oI'll ---------------------------- 0 (18 NIIANV8j � �l 10 I �_ m z 0 no _ O LL1 I I 96 --0 I oI'll ---------------------------- 0 (18 NIIANV8j � �l 10 F_ au �'* THE ROANOKE TIMES roanoke.tam 4F News Sports Business Weather Life&Entertainment Opinion In depth Customer Care obituaries Jobs Classifieds finditi A conceptual rendering of the Graves-Hamphrcys building on Franklin Road. Virginia Varsity has plans to acquire the buildingand convert parts of it into residential, office and self -storage space. Photo is courtesy of Virginia Varsity Self Storage. f V Z a Q Virginia Varsity Self Storage and its sister moving company, Virginia Varsity Transfer, are in the process of expanding several locations and will be adding a mixed-use property to their portfolio. Owner john Lugar confirmed that Virginia Varsity has the Graves -Humphreys building on Franklin Road in Roanoke under contract with plans to add self -storage, office space and residential units. The 93,000 -square -foot property is owned by Triple 5 Realty and is used as for office space, with several businesses leasing spots throughout the building- The property formerly housed 6raves- Humphreys Hardware to. Inc., a tool and hardware distributor. It sits at I W Franklin Road Southwest across more than two acres and five buildings.. Lugar's long-term vision for the property includes building updates and construction of a new multiple -story storage facility and residential complex. He hopes the purchase will close at the beginning of next year and will immediately get to work renovating the main building that faces Franklin Road. The third floor of the main property is almost entirely vacant, he said, and he plans to convert that level into self -storage and renovate some space on the ground level for commercial storefronts. Tentative plans call for tearing down two of the property's buildings to create a more accessible entrance from Franklin Road, as well as constructing a new four-story building in the parking lot that will house 50 apartments and more self -storage space. Parking will be moved to an area underneath the building, which is in a flood plain. NOW PLAYING ( 1 U1 2d: DWI MISS! - 12127 phwlew NEXT Ow1't WWI, 12127 Storefront • Business Intel: Roanoke Star Tank seeks applicants • Business Intel: Wasena welcomes design studio and online shop • Business Intel: Subway restaurant leaves downtown Roanoke • First Baptist Church buys WSLS building in downtown Roanoke ■ Business Intel: Mexican restaurant opens in former fondue spot in Roanoke MedBeat • Med Beat: Hey, Santa, check out Virginia Tech's list of naughty and nice bike helmets • Med Beat: Carilion's Code Kringle to eollectgifts Sunday for children being treated for mental illnesses • Med Beat: Harrington named interim dean of VTC medical school • Med Beat: So what is universal health care or socialized medicine? • Med Beat: Tech wins $1 million to study head injuries in women athletes "We have a long-term vision and are deeply invested and interested in contributing to our community's quality of life," Lugar said. "This mixed-use project, embracing the live, work, play ethos, will bring a new life and energy to this property where the River's Fdge Sports Complex and the Stocks greenways are in our backyard." This is one of several expansions the locally based company has been involved in recently. Equities Commoditles Bonds Forex 1M 3m 1y 5y max Virginia Varsity is also expanding its first storage property on Starkey Road in Roanoke County, — adding more than two acres and nearly doubling in size over the next few years with an additional 50,000 square feet of self -storage planned. Its Botetourt County location also recently finished a nearly 13,1100 -square -foot expansion with more planned in the next five years. Additionally, Virginia Varsity Transfer constructed 10,000 square feet of climatized warehouse an its headquarters property in Salem. 11 4. Ft. Knox Storage - Construction plans are pending for this already- approved Williamson Road project, located between Old Southwest and Downtown. Plans are for a multi -story, modern storage property with 72,000 sf. RE�.hSTIJDIO-y CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS OPTION - 1 3rd Floor 17,881 sf 2nd Floor 17,881 sf El I I st Floor 16,909 sf El 1, 71,751 sf Total Gross Building Area Home Local Article Roanoke City Council approves rezoning for proposed self storage facility By Logan 5herrdl I Posted: Tue 12:45 AM. Mar 21, 2017 1 Updated: Tue 8:18 AM. Mar 21, 2017 fflulmacg. ROANOKE, Va. (WDBJ7) The proposed self storage units on Williamson Road in downtown Roanoke moved one step closer to reality tonight after city council voted 5-1 to rezone the current property. Currently this land is occupied by the old Shepherd Auto Supply building, which has been vacant for several years. Developer Jim Cherney wants a three-story, climate -controlled, self storage units building. City Council held a public forum to hear from citizens and business owners before their vote to rezone this from D, Downtown District to 1-1, Light Industrial District. Homeowners in the area seethe storage facility as a catalyst for more development. "The neighborhood will only be improved by this change," said Nicole Harris who lives near the proposed site. Cherney Development Company said they've constructed other storage properties in North Carolina but that wasn't enough to persuade a unanimous vote. The 5-1 vote in favor of the rezoning gives Cherney a green light that he believes will only improve the area. "It's a $5 million project so the tax base goes up and I think it will make quite an improvement;' said Cherney. Cherney added he has his eye on a few other properties in Roanoke saying, "We have two other locations in mind." 13 14 POST OFFICE BOX 1776 MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA 24115-1776 January 31, 2019 Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator County of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Venture Storage Group, LLC Dear Administrator O'Donnell: I am writing on behalf of Carter Bank & Trust ("Carter Bank") in support of the recent application of Venture Storage Group, LLC ("Venture") to develop a climate -controlled storage facility at South Peak (the "Project"). As you are aware, Carter Bank is the holder of the Special Assessment Revenue Note dated December 21, 2012 (the "CDA Note") issued by the South Peak Community Development Authority (the "CDA"). The funds advanced under the CDA Note were used to finance the public infrastructure at South Peak. As the holder of the CDA Note and as an active lender in the Roanoke Valley in general, we closely reviewed Venture's application (the "Application") and the report issued by Roanoke County's Planning Department (the "Staff Report"). After reading the Application and the Staff Report, it is clear that Venture proposes developing an attractive and high-quality project. It appears that the Project would be a compliment and benefit to the surrounding area and South Peak. With respect to the CDA, the Project would provide employment opportunities_ strengthen the economic base and increase tax revenues. In those regards, the Project will help further the very goals that the CDA was designed to promote. It will also strengthen the CDA and South Peak by diversifying and adding to the financial stakeholders within the CDA taxing district. Finally, increasing the tax revenues generated within the CDA district will increase the coverage ratio of tax revenues against the payments due on the CDA Note. In that regard, it will enhance the financial performance of the CDA. Carter Bank, the County and the Developer have worked together on the CDA for many years. Despite changing and challenging market conditions, the development has been successful. We view the Venture Project as the next step in that success. Accordingly, and as stated above, Carter Bank & Trust supports the Project. I'd greatly appreciate you sharing copies of this letter with the CDA Board members, the County Planning Staff, the County Planning Commission and the County Board of Supervisors. Sincere y, Andy Meece Vice President and Senior Finance Officer AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN A C-2 (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT A MINI WAREHOUSE STORAGE FACILITY ON 3.10 ACRES, LOCATED NEAR THE 4400 BLOCK OF SOUTH PEAK BOULEVARD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, in 2004 the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors rezoned approximately 30 acres of the South Peak Development (then called Slate Hill) from CO2C, R-3, and C-1 to C -2C. As part of the rezoning, there were a set of proffers that addressed uses, slopes, buildings, roads, access, ridgeline, utilities, retaining walls, landscaping, site lighting, signage, parking and storm water management. Also included with the application was a set of exhibits showing the general road and development pattern for South Peak; and WHEREAS, in 2010, Roanoke County formed the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA) to assist in financing the infrastructure, improvements and services in connection with the development of the land into a mixed-use development proposed to include commercial, retail and residential component; and WHEREAS, in 2012, the South Peak Condominium Project and Estates at South Peak rezoning was approved. In 2014, construction was completed for the South Peak Hilton Garden Inn. This property is zoned C -2C and was subject to the 2004 proffers. In 2016, the construction of the Texas Roadhouse restaurant was completed; and WHEREAS, three separate parcels are included as part of this special use permit request. All of the parcels are currently owned by McNeil Properties, LLC with Venture Storage Group, LLC as the contract purchaser. The properties were not part of the 2004 Page 1 of 4 rezoning request but are adjacent to those properties and are part of the same overall development. Until this project request, staff is unaware of any development plans associated with South Peak that have included a mini-warehouse/indoor self -storage use; and WHEREAS, the submitted concept plan by Venture Storage Group, LLC shows a three story building approximately 105,000 square feet in size; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 5, 2019 and subsequently denied the request, with a 4-1 vote of denial; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 12, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 26, 2019; and law. WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board hereby grants a special use permit to allow construction of a mini - warehouse storage facility on 3.10 acres zoned C-2 (high intensity commercial district), located near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard (including all or portions of Tax Map Nos. 077.20-01-21.00-0000, 077.20-01- 22.00-0000, and 077.20-01-24.00-0000) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled South Peak Self Storage Venture Storage Group, LLC Page 2 of 4 Concept Site Plan prepared by Mattern & Craig, dated November 6, 2018 subject to special use permit conditions and those changes which may be required by Roanoke County during site plan review. b. The building shall be developed in general conformance to the architectural renderings titled South Peak Self Storage prepared by McMillan Pazdan Smith Architecture, submitted with the application. c. Landscaping shall be provided for the front, sides and rear walls of the building. The size of the landscaped area shall be twenty (20) percent of the square footage of each wall fagade of the building. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of large and small evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs and ground cover. d. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. 2. The Board finds that the granting of the special use permit meets with the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code. The proposed use conforms with the standards set forth in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, and further conforms with the following general standards: a. The proposed use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan of the County and with official County policies adopted in relation thereto, including the stated purposes of the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed use will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community; the Planning Commission Page 3 of 4 has evaluated adverse use with consideration to items such as, but not limited to, traffic congestion, noise, lights, dust, drainage, water quality, odor, fumes and vibrations; and c. In considering impacts, the Planning Commission has given due regard to the timing of the operation, site design, access, screening, and other matters which might be regulated to mitigate adverse impact. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 4 of 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: February 26, 2019 The petition of Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for a commercial outdoor sports and recreation facility, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive, Vinton Magisterial District Philip Thompson Acting Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances to rezone property from residential to commercial. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking to use the property for commercial outdoor sports and recreation (two softball fields and associated facilities). Commercial outdoor sports and recreation is not a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district, but is a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on February 5, 2019. Four citizens spoke in opposition to the rezoning request during the public hearing. The major concerns expressed were an increase in traffic and related traffic issues on Bonsack Road and in the neighborhood, access location, hours of operation, exterior lighting, noise, access to the property by Glade Creek Road/Pioneer Drive, required landscaping buffers, and the architectural style/color of the field house/press box Page 1 of 2 building. The Planning Commission discussed the changes to the revised concept plan based on public comments received during the community meeting including access to the site and the moving of facilities further away from neighboring residential properties. The Planning Commission also discussed exterior lighting in proximity to Route 460, the location of parking, the traffic impact study, Pioneer Drive right-of-way, property maintenance, parking along Pioneer Drive and Glade Creek, and fencing. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1 to C- 2 with one proffered condition: 1. Concept Plan Conformance. The owner hereby proffers general conformance with the "Scrappers Softball Fields - Development Plan" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated January 30, 2019 subject to any changes required by the applicable review agencies during the site plan review process. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1 to C-2 with the one proffered condition. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Virginia Class Action Softball Club Request: To rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for a Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation facility Location: 4774 Pioneer Drive Magisterial District: Vinton Proffered Conditions 1. The owner hereby proffers general conformance with the "Scrappers Softball (proposed): Fields — Development Plan" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated January 30, 2019 subject to any changes required by the applicable review agencies during the site plan review process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Virginia Class Action Softball Club is requesting to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District with a proffered condition, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive. The submitted concept plan shows the development of two softball fields with exterior lighting and supporting facilities. The existing structures shall be removed. The proposed use of Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation by the Scrapper Softball Club will allow for the phased development of a recreational softball facility for the local team to practice, play games, and potentially host softball tournaments at full build out. This site is designated Transition on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highways oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas. Parks (public and private recreational facilities) are an appropriate use within the Transition future land use designation. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation as "predominantly participant uses conducted in open or partially enclosed or screened facilities. Typical uses include driving ranges, miniature golf, swimming pools, tennis courts, outdoor racquetball courts, motorized cart and motorcycle tracks, and motorized model airplane flying facilities." Commercial outdoor sports and recreation is not a permitted use in the R- 1 zoning district, but is a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Topography/Vegetation — The site slopes down from Route 460/Challenger Avenue, then is generally flat. The flat portion of the site sits approximately 30'-35' below Route 460/Challenge Avenue and is in a floodplain overlay district. A majority of the site is located within a FEMA defined floodway and floodplain. The 100 Year Floodplain is generally identified on-site ranging from approximate elevations of 998 to 995. There is a moderately wooded natural buffer on the northern slope from Route 460 with Appalachian Power electric poles on the hillside. On the southern side of the property is Pioneer Drive, a VDOT state maintained road, a wooded natural buffer, and Glade Creek which acts as a buffer. On the opposite side of Glade Creek from the property there are two sets of railroad tracks. Surrounding Neighborhood — The surrounding zoning of the subject parcels include I -1C — Low Intensity Industrial District zoning with conditions, C -2S - High Intensity Commercial with special use permit, R-3 - Medium Density Multi -family Residential zoning, R-1 - Low Density Residential zoning, AR — Agricultural/Residential zoning, and Botetourt County's Al — Agricultural zoning. In Roanoke County, the surrounding uses include mostly single family homes with some agriculture south of Route 460. The single family homes are located to the south and east along Bonsack Road and Glade Creek Road. To the north and west of the site across Route 460 is Home Shopping Network's industrial facility and Bonsack Baptist Church parking. There are large commercial and restaurant uses along Route 460. In Botetourt County, there is nearby industrial and a public library on the opposite north side of Route 460. On the south side of Route 460 there is a commercial bank, single family homes, and agricultural uses near the parcel. The Blue Ridge Parkway is within a mile of the parcel. At its closest point, the Parkway is set over 2,000 feet away and is located on a ridge. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The submitted concept plan shows two softball fields measuring approximately 200' from home plate on each. The softball fields will include dugouts, bleachers, and a scoreboard for each field, as well as fencing and lighting. Eight (8) light poles (four for each field) approximately 80 -feet in height are proposed. A proposed field house with press box measuring 80 feet by 100 feet is located in between the two softball fields (approximately 16,000 square feet). Architectural renderings of the proposed building are not included in the application. Additional facilities shown on the concept plan include a warm up area, a picnic shelter, and a playground. The concept plan also shows approximately 128 parking spaces and the required buffer yard (Type C - 40') along the southern property line. All improvements will be installed in phases as Club funding allows. Access/Traffic Circulation — As shown on the concept plan, there would only be one access to the property. That access would be off of Bonsack Road, approximately where the power lines cross Bonsack Road. VDOT has reviewed the application and will require a minor traffic study for possible impacts to Bonsack Road. This would be required for any development on this site regardless of the rezoning. Community Meeting —A Community Meeting was held on Thursday, January 24, 2019 in the cafeteria at Bonsack Elementary School to review the original concept submission. Twenty-one (21) people attended the meeting including the applicants and their agent. The major concerns/comments included the following: 1. Schedule of practices, games, and tournaments 2. Maximum number of people using the facility at once 3. Concerned about lack of parking and that overflow will be pushed to Glade Creek Road - Possibility for "No Parking" signs along Glade Creek Road 4. Questioned whether access could be changed to Bonsack Road, Challenger Avenue, or share an entrance with the neighboring bank (in Botetourt County) 5. Glade Creek Road being too narrow for heavy volume of traffic 6. Traffic causing Glade Creek Road congestion/backup onto the Norfolk and Southern railroad tracks 2 7. Change to real estate property values 8. Evening exterior lighting and noise — referenced the light design and Roanoke County Noise Ordinance 9. Flooding concerns downstream with more pervious pavement/less woods on the property — also the spring box. Concerned about the change in flow of the creek. 10. Security fence and press box building architectural style — will they be visually appealing to the neighborhood? 11. Which other leagues will have access to rent the facility? How often? 12. Overall construction schedule and timeline Based on the comments received at the community meeting, the applicants revised its concept plan submission. Notable changes include: moving the entrance from Glade Creek Road to Bonsack Road; moving the fields further away from the neighborhood; re -orienting the supporting facilities (Field house/pressbox, picnic shelter, and warm up area) to be further from the property line; and adding approximately 30 parking spaces and moving parking away from the residential neighborhood and Glade Creek Road. Agency Comments — Various agencies commented on the original concept plan. Most of these comments would be consistent with the revised concept plan, except VDOT's. The following comments were provided by the various agencies on this request: Building Safety: The Office of Building Safety stated that the construction will need to meet all the requirements of the current Uniform Statewide Building Code. Solid Waste: Solid Waste indicated the volume of trash would exceed the limit imposed by the ordinance and therefore they will have to acquire a private dumpster. Fire & Rescue: Fire & Rescue does not object to the project, however did state: "it would be subjected to access and fire flow requirements during the site plan review process". Fire & Rescue also noted that the project could increase emergency medical calls to the complex as well as create vehicle accidents when vehicles leave the facility and enter on Challenger Avenue. Economic Development: Economic Development offers no objection to the Virginia Class Action Softball Club rezoning request to develop two softball fields at Glade Creek Road and Challenger Ave. The subject property is bordered by the railroad and Challenger Avenue, a high traffic commercial corridor. The site is appropriate for recreational uses given its significant development constraints including topography, floodplain and access. Stormwater Operations: The property located at Tax Map No. 040.02-01-02.00 is located in the FEMA designated floodplain. As such, the following requirements/comments will apply: 1. Grading within the floodway - Flood carrying capacity maintained with no rise certification is required. 2. Structure located in the floodplain - Commercial construction standards apply, lowest enclosed area 1 ft above BFE. 3. Will need to address wet lands with DEQ and USACE. VDOT: VDOT had six comments on the request: 1.) The second paragraph of section one of the Statement of Justification should be revised to state that the subject parcel is located along Pioneer Drive (Route 703) but also has public road frontage along Glade Creek Road (Route 636), Bonsack Road (Route 603), and Challenger Road (Route 460). 2.) VDOT may require the proposed development plan to provide recommended traffic mitigations for the frontage of the property along Pioneer Drive, Route 703. Any proposed realignment or abandonment request for Pioneer Drive will require involvement of VDOT's Central Office and the County of Roanoke. 3.) A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of-way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 4.) The VDOT Road Design Manual. Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes but is not limited to commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 5.) VDOT concurs with the findings of the TIA submitted with this rezoning application. Please note that 2017 traffic data for Pioneer Drive, Route 703, is provided on the VDOT website in the same location where the data for Glade Creek Road, Route 636, was obtained. 6.) The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The County's Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Transition. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Parks - public and private recreational facilities — are an appropriate use within the Transition future land use designation. The proposed project is in conformance with the Transition future land use designation. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Virginia Class Action Softball Club is requesting to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, with a proffered condition, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive adjacent to Route 460, Bonsack Road, and Glade Creek Road. The submitted concept plan shows the development of two softball fields with exterior lighting and supporting facilities. The proposed use of Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation by the Scrapper Softball Club will allow for the phased development of a recreational softball facility that is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation of Transition. CASE NUMBER: 5-212019 PREPARED BY: Alexander Jones HEARING DATES: PC: 215119 BOS: 2126119 ATTACHMENTS: Application Aerial Map Floodplain Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Photographs R-1 District Standards C-2 District Standards Transition Future Land Use Description Public Comments E County of Roanoke OF PQ0./J RF Community Development Planning & Zoning z ° ' A 5204 Bernard Drive '$3$ P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 1'�-1(?�,c P1 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: iI.-H-it Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540.330.6151 Application fee: PC,1 date: ROANOKE, VA 24018 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Placards issued: BOS date: ROANOKE, VA 24018 Property Location Case Number a ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) [3 Rezoning D Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal D Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540.330.6151 Virginia Class Action Softball Club c/o Richard Ewers Work: n/a P.O. Box 21361 Cell #: n/a ROANOKE, VA 24018 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: _540.676.2982 Robert McGuffin / Richard McGuffin Work: n/a 5271 Flintlock Road Fax No. #: n/a ROANOKE, VA 24018 Property Location Magisterial District: Vinton 4774 PIONEER DRIVE Community Planning area: $onsack ROANOKE, VA 24018 Tax Map No. Portion of 040.02-01-02.00-0000 Sin le Family Residential Existing Zoning: g y Size of parcel(s): Acres: 11.03 acres Existing Land Use: Residential REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed zoning: C2 (High Intensity Commercial District) w/conditions Proposed Land Use: Commerical Outdoor Sports and Recreation Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes x No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article 1V (Special Use Permit)? Yes I No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning O e ' order Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordilae Appeal Interpretation Zoning Map Z0 of of to A Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE Ep MAj# p�V SE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. C4 R/SfW/CP VlAA R/S1W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA '9 S, Consultation J 8 1/2" x I V concept plan Applica f Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that 1 am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. 1til C[',i%O Owner's Signature (fAueur) 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE. PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS, Applicant SCRAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See attached Narrative Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. e See attached Narrative Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. See attached narrative SCRAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS REZONING REQUEST: Statement of Justification 1) The purpose of this zoning request is to allow for the development of (2) two softball fields with supporting improvements and infrastructure on a portion of the existing tax parcel 040.02-01-02.00-0000 for the Scrapper Softball Club (contract purchaser). The softball club currently practices at multiple locations within the County of Roanoke and Botetourt, however they are interested in creating their own facilities or home fields for practice and games. The proposed use of Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation by the Scrappers Softball Club will allow for the phased development of a recreational softball facility for the local team to practice, play games, and potentially softball tournaments at full build out. The existing parcel being rezoned is currently zoned as R1- Residential. This request is being made to rezone the property to C2- (High Intensity Commercial District) with proffered conditions. The subject parcel is located along Pioneer Drive (Route 703 but also has public road frontage along Glade Creek Road (Route 636), Bonsack Road (Route 603), and Challenger Road (Route 460) The subject property is unique in that much of the available `buildable' land is located within the floodway of Glade Creek. The proposed development area is located approximately 30' to 35' below Challenger Avenue and is in a floodplain overlay district. Due to the topographical and floodplain challenges of the site, a recreational use provides a viable option for this currently vacant property. This request furthers the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance by providing an appropriate recreational use within an urban service area which serve the community and county wide recreational needs. The proposed location along Challenger Avenue provides adequate access while maintain appropriate distances from adjacent residential/agricultural property. The subject property is bordered by the public right of way and urban principal arterial highway of Challenger Avenue to the north, Glade Creek and Norfolk Southern rail lines to the south, commercial bank owned property to the east, and public right of way of Glade Creek Road and Bonsack Road to the west. The proffered civil development plan indicates the proposed improvements including (2) softball fields, a two-story press box/field house with indoor practice facilities, dugouts, warm-up areas, bleachers, picnic shelter, playground, and associated drive aisles/parking areas. These improvements will be installed in phases as Club funding allows. 2) The proposed uses conform to the general guidelines and policies contained within the Roanoke County Community Plan, which encourages commercial growth in appropriate locations. This recreational use will serve the community within an urban service area while providing a low intensity use on a parcel with frontage on major arterial thoroughfare, but restricted due to unique site challenges. The proposed project is located within the Bonsack Community Planning District and will promote and enhance the intent of this community by providing additional recreational opportunities while preserving and protecting existing vegetation and waterways on-site. 3) No negative impacts to the county infrastructure are anticipated with this development as outlined with specifics below. Exterior field lighting as shown on the photometric plan is 60' tall with a maximum overall limited height of 80'. Extensive and complimentary landscaping will be provided to ensure an appealing facility along with appropriate buffers from adjacent land uses. A 40' wide Type C will be provided along the southern and western property lines to supplement the vegetation in place as applicable. Fire and Rescue will be served from Glade Creek Road and the proposed site provides adequate access for emergency operations. All improvements will be planned and constructed in accordance with Roanoke County, Western Virginia Water Authority (W.V.W.A.), and Virginia Department of Transportation (V.D.O.T.) standards as applicable. CONCEPT ELAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations, A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development x b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions x d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties x e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. x f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties x g. All property lines and easements x h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development x j, Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS x k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site x 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers x m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections x o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants x p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed n/a q, If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Z0a� 41at, 6 o' -X X o � q X X I a I I I I I 1 I I I I ; I I i I i 1 O I I I I j o / I �iLLJ O UI i OfOmLL.1I 0 0 �- LSI LL. o % I o O °a ani v'`i p O X X I a I I I I I 1 I I I I ; I I i I i 1 O I I I I j o / I �iLLJ O UI i n =0_ ~ it - J Q v U .on b J J of LL, W_ J LL. Iz o OfOmLL.1I , LSI LL. p (n : % I o Z o Imo\ /� O �\ I LLI N \ � p Z Z 0 ryr n =0_ ~ it - J Q v U .on b J J of LL, W_ J LL. Iz o Imo\ /� O �\ I LLI N \ � p Z Z 0 ryr n =0_ ~ it - J Q v U .on b J J of LL, W_ J LL. Iz o SCRAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS REZONING REQUEST: The following proffered conditions is provided for the above referenced Zoning Rett nest Proffered Condition: 1. The owner hereby proffers general conformance with the "Scrappers Softball Fields -- Development Pian" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated January 30, 2019 subject to any changes required by the applicable review agencies during the site plan review process. Property Owner: 4774 Pioneer Drive Printed:����- Signed- - -� �'`--_� C\,`� Title . �''�" ` L Date Printed: --�) G H A -RMC6`'v- pe-- P1,4 / t� � Signed: g Title����L Date : F613. ' , Z�7 L onrr � Community Development' a Planning & zoning Division rasa POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDQT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 --ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 400, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day ,Effective date: April 79, 2005 7 o� ROAryd�� Community Development z Planning & Zoning Division a l896 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. ,Effective dater April 1-9,2005 SCRAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature Date TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY x•10 SCRAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS 4774 PIONEER DRIVE County of Roanoke, VA 24012 B&A PROJECT #04180070.00 DATE: December 14, 2018 REVISED: January 29, 2019 BAUER St ASSOCIATES PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone (540) 772-9580 Introduction: This traffic study is being provided to analyze the projected traffic generation for A recreational softball complex located at 4774 Pioneer Drive within the County of Roanoke, Virginia. The proposed Scrappers Softball fields project will consist of the construction of 2 softball fields and miscellaneous support improvements. Existing Daily and Peak Hour Traffic: 2017 VDOT published data (please see Attachment 1): Bonsack Road (Route 603) AADT = 600 Directional Factor = n/a K Factor = n/a Existing and Proposed Site Generated Traffic: The trip generation calculations were based on the proposed land use shown on the civil site plan prepared by Balzer and Associates (please see Attachment 2). The policies and procedures found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, were employed to determine the potential site generated traffic volumes for the proposed development. Traffic volumes for the average weekday and weekday peak hours of the adjacent street traffic are provided and illustrated in the Table and Figure below, respectively. Proposed Trip Generation: Recreational Softball Fields (2) TRIP GENERATION LAND USE AM PEAK HR PM PEAK HOUR DAILY Proposed ITE Independent Develo ment Code Variable Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Soccer LU:488 2 Fields 2 0 2 16 16 32 143 Complex 2 32 143 TOTAL 2 Summary: Based on the data provided, the assumptions made, and the potential site generated traffic, the results of the analysis are: • No turn lanes or tapers are required due to low volumes of trip generation from the site and existing traffic on Bonsack Road. o The soccer complex Land Use as it is closest to the proposed use and may closely match the anticipated trip generation at full build out. The traffic summary has been provided to analyze the background traffic regarding the proposed improvements with the proposed development of the Scrappers Softball Fields. 3 Virqinia Department of Transportation ATTACHMENT #1 Traffic Engineering Division 2017 Annual Averaqe Daily Traffic Volume Estimates By Section of Route Roanoke Maintenance Area 4/9/2018 28 --------------Truck-------------- K Dir Route Length AADT QA 4Tire Bus QC OK AAWDT OW Year Roanoke County 2Axle 3+Axle 1Trail 2Trail Factor Factor US 460 S, Challenger Ave 603 Bonsack Rd 0.28 750 R NA NA 12/06/2012 tea: 80-1096 Stoney Ride Dr 603 Bonsack Rd 0.25 660 R NA NA 12/06/2012 80-606 Layman Rd 603 Bonsack Rd 0.12 600 R NA NA 12/06/2012 80-631 Cook Creek Rd 603 Bonsack Rd 0.06 580 R NA NA 12/06/2012 80-636 Glade Creek Rd 603 Bonsack Rd 0.23 600 R NA NA 12/06/2012 T°' US 460 N, Challenger Ave "°°11 NCL Roanoke 605 Old Mountain Rd 1.07 3200 G 98% 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% C 0.115 0.512 3400 G 2017 80-621 Beaumont Rd 605 Old Mountain Rd 1.10 2800 G 98% 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% F 0.117 0.539 3000 G 2017 T° 80-627 Sanderson Dr 80-627 Shadwell Dr 605 Sanderson Dr 0.20 5900 N 98% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% N 0.119 0.710 6300 N 2017 T° Botetourt County Line 80-603 Bonsack Rd 606 Layman Rd 0.53 140 R NA NA 12/06/2012 T° Dead End 80-669 Patterson Dr 607 Bottom Creek Rd 1.63 40 R NA NA 12/27/2012 80-744 Rocky Rd 607 Bottom Creek Rd 0.20 70 R NA NA 12/27/2012 80-637 Bottom Creek Lane 607 Bottom Creek Rd 2.40 240 R NA NA 12/27/2012 T° 80-711 Tinsley Lane Alt SR 220 Cloverdale Rd 608 Kingsman Rd 0.30 260 R NA NA 02/26/2013 T° Botetourt County Line 80-610 West Ruritan Rd 609 Ruritan Rd 0.19 310 R NA NA 06/16/2015 �m 50-1049 Donabale Dr 609 East Ruritan Rd 1.14 1200 R 0.108 0.637 NA 06/16/2015 T° US 460 Challenger Ave Cul -de -Sac 610 Coachman Dr 0.35 130 R NA NA 12/04/2012 80-1051 Sourwood St 610 Coachman Dr 0.22 a 270 R NA NA 12/04/2012 80-609 Ruritan Rd 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.07 630 R 0.126 0.699 NA 06/16/2015 tea: 80-1050 Jeana Lane 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.24 960 R 0.107 0.613 NA 06/16/2015 ��. 80-1054 Broyles Lane 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.38 1400 R 0.102 0.635 NA 06/16/2015 80-1211 Summer Field Dr 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.09 m: 2300 R NA NA 12/04/2012 80-1072 Ashbury Court 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.18 2700 R NA NA 12/04/2012 a : 80-1022 Mockin Bird Hill Rd 610 W Ruritan Rd 0.10 3000 R NA NA 06/16/2015 T° 80-1021 Blueview Rd 4/9/2018 28 Land Use: 488 Soccer Complex Description ATTACHMENT #2 A soccer complex is an outdoor facility that is used for non-professional soccer games. It may consist of multiple fields. The size of each field within the land use may vary to accommodate games for different age groups. Ancillary amenities may include stadium seating, a fitness trail, an activities shelter, aquatic center, picnic grounds, basketball and tennis courts, and a playground. Public park (Land Use 411) is a related use. Additional Data Caution should be used when applying these data. Peaking at soccer complexes typically occurred in time periods shorter than one hour. These peaking periods may have durations of 10 to 13 minutes. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important to collect driveway counts in 10 -minute intervals. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the one site with data, the peak hours for site trips on a weekday, Saturday, and Sunday were between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m., 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m., and 10:15 and 11:15 a.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1990s and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Indiana, and Washington. Source Numbers 377, 519. 565, 722, 856, 908, 952, 956 Soccer Complex (488) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Fields On a: Weekday SettinglLocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. Num. of Fields: 10 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50 exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Field Average Rate Range of Rates 71 33 42.86 - 90 81 Data Plot and Equation Standard Deviation 81.06 Caution — Small Sample Size N 1,000 w 500 - X X I 00 5 10 15 X - Number of Fields X Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given X - - - -- Average Rate R'= .r. Soccer Complex (488 ) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Fields Can a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies- 5 Avg. Num. of Fields: 14 Directional Distribution: 61% entering, 39% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Field Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.99 0.29- 1.88 0.62 Data Plot and Equation Caution — Small Sample Size 3a X 2s 20 LU vy Q r 15 X' X 10 X s X a0 5 10 15 20 X = Number of Fields X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R'= "" Soccer Complex (488) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Fields On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. Num. of Fields: 14 Directional Distribution: 66% entering, 34% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Field Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 16.43 8.71 -24.88 6.36 Data Plot and Equation Caution— Small Sample Size 400 X 300 -c LIJ X a u F 200 X 100 X 00 5 10 15 20 X = Number of Fields X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 13.92(X) + 35.13 R'= 0.53 IGINATE FROM EACH FIELD'S LAYING SURFACE 0, 0 0. 0 0, 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. C 0. 0 0, 0 D 0, U U. D 0.0 0. 0 U. 0 0, 0 ND. AVG PCIN7S 0. 0 0. 0 0, 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. C 0. 0 0, n 3 0, p 0.0 0. 0 0, 0 0.0 U. U L 59 D. 0 0, n o, 0 0.0 C. 0 0. 0 0. C 0. C 0.0 0. n 0. 0 U. 0 0.0 3'0 0, 0 63 30. 2 D. 0 0, 0 0, 0 0.0 0. 0 0. C 0, C U. C D. 0 1 0, 0 0, 0 p, p 0,0 0, 0 0, 0 +INF Q, Q 0, 0 0, 0 0.0 C. 0 0, 0 0, a 0. C 0. 0 0.0 C. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0, 0 0. 0 010 0, 0 0. 0 0.0 C. 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0 0. 0 OLD n. 0 n. 0 G. 0 0.0 n. 0 0. D 0.0 0. 0 0, 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 D. C 0. C i. 0 C. 0 0. C C. 0 0. 0 0.0 0, 0 0, 0 0. D U. 0 0, 0 3 0. 0 . 0 0. 0 D. 0 0. 0 O. C 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0, 0 0. 0 0. D 0. 0 10.0 3 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 U. 0 a. 0 )'0 U. 03`66_0 0 0, 0 0,0 0. 0 D. 0 0.0 0,C U. U 0. 0 0. 0 U. 0 3 010 o0.�0 1), 0 0..-x,0. 0_ 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 a Q 0. 0 a. n 0.0 0.1) 7 0, 0 0. 0 6-0--s-CL-0, 0TH 00.. D of 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 a 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0, 0 7 0, 0 d.-U-QQ.0. 0 0, CI' 0. 01 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. Q 0, 0 0. 0 D. 0 0.0 0, n D 0. 0 0, 0 U. 0 D. 0 0, 0• 0. P 0. 0 0. C U. 0 0. 0 n, 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 1 0.0 I U. D 0. 0 0, 0 0, 0 0.0 Q.❑ n,0 0.n 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.a 0,0 a,0 0.n n,0: p, p 1110 0, n 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 1 1 0, Q 0. n 0, 0 q. 0 0, a n, n� n. 0 0.0 D. 0 0.0 D. 0 0.0 0, 0 D. 1 0, 1 1 0, 1 D. 0 0. C 0. 0 D..O 0. Oi n. 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 D, 0 0.0 0, 0 0, 1 0, I I 0. 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0, n' D. 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0, 0 0.0 D. 0 D. 1 D. 1 1 0. 1 D. C o. 0 0-0 D. o D. p D. 0 0.0 0, D D. 0 0, 0 0.0 D. 0 D. 1 D. 1 1 D. 1 C, 1 0. D 010 C. 0 0. D o, 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 01 D 0.0 u.0 o. I U. 1 I D. 1 0, 1 0.0 0.0 0. D 0 a D, 0 0. D D. 0 0.0 91 D D. a D. 0 O. 0 D, 1 I„ n.1 0, D "o, 0 0.0 0, 0 0, o 00 0.0 0.0 D.0 00 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.CI 0.1 0.0 D.0 C.0 0.0 0.0�z IJ 1 0.0 D.D D.0 0,0 n,0 D,a 0,0 0.D 0.D I O.D U.D 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.01 a n_ 0.0 a.0 1). 1) 0.0 D,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.q3 DD U.0 D,0 U, a,n o.D 0.D 0.0 DC 0.0 an 0.0 0.0 a, o o. D 0. 0 0.0 D. C 0. D 0, D 0. o D. D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o D.D o.D G.a3 nn a.a p. r) p an an ILLUI GRID I[d-,fledforcom',bb,h[y with the m-lingwith the wi,o IC' Ihot could_ Serio us injury yr property damage. W ARE REP=ONLY AS A SpWM7[ON (PULE LIICATD7NS,ic 5 IC TflLSRANCES OF LAMP, EH 7B ELL ICEN7A77VE I ' 12-12-18 I'[ FPwv Hubbell Lighilno, In E. ! to 701 MILLENNIUM BLVD 1 2 3 2 4 2 B 29607VILLE, SC ILLUMINANCE SUMMARY TARGET PLANE, ILLUMINANCE, X -Y SHORIX, ) HDRIZ13NTAL FC A7 X = 3.00' NAME ND. AVG PCIN7S MAX MIN A/M M/M l FGRID FIELD A -I C46.7 25 5D,1 67.5 35,2 1,42 1.92 1. FI AC 63 30. 2 46. 7 19, G L 59 2. 46 1. TARGET PLANE, ILLUMINANCE, X -Y CHORIZ, ) HORIZONTAL FC A7 X = 3.00' FIELD B -I 25 5D, 1 67, 5 35, 2 1142 1. 92 1, FIELD B -p 63 30. 2 46, 7 19, 0 J,_39_L2._4G_j 1, TARGET PLANEX-Y ILLUMINANCE, CHORIZ. ) HORIZONTAL FC A7 Z - 0.00' SPILL 1203 1 0, 4 1 20, 0 0, 0 j +INF ILLUI GRID I[d-,fledforcom',bb,h[y with the m-lingwith the wi,o IC' Ihot could_ Serio us injury yr property damage. W ARE REP=ONLY AS A SpWM7[ON (PULE LIICATD7NS,ic 5 IC TflLSRANCES OF LAMP, EH 7B ELL ICEN7A77VE I ' 12-12-18 I'[ FPwv Hubbell Lighilno, In E. ! to 701 MILLENNIUM BLVD 1 2 3 2 4 2 B 29607VILLE, SC SCAPPERS SOFTBALL FIELDS REZONING REQUEST: Adjacent Property Owners of the subjectparcel: Tax Map #: 040.02-01-02.00-0000 Roanoke County Parcels: N/F Owner: Juanita R Pack & Robert A. Pack Jr. Property Address: 4738 Glade Creek Road Tax Parcel: 040.02-01-01.00-0000 Zoning: C3/R1 N/F Owner: Charles M. Wimmer IV Property Address: 4822 Sidetrack Road Tax Parcel: 040.04-01-06.00-0000 Zoning: R1 N/F Owner: Robert Lee Smelser Property Address: 4830 Sidetrack Road Tax Parcel: 040.04-01-07.00-0000 Zoning: R1 N/F Owner: Charles W. Jennings Property Address: 4840 GIade Creek Road Tax Parcel: 040.02-01-04.00-0000 Zoning: AR N/F Owner: Charles W. Jennings Property Address: 0 Pioneer Drive Tax Parcel: 040.02-01-03.00-0000 Zoning: Rl N/F Owner: Shihua Zheng Property Address: 4860 Glade Creek Road Tax Parcel: 040.02-01-05.00-0000 Zoning: AR N/F Owner: BIue Ridge Associates Property Address: 1 Avery Row Tax Parcel: 040.01-01-17.02-0000 Zoning: I1 C N/F Owner: Blue Ridge Associates Property Address: 0 Challenger Avenue Tax Parcel • 040.01-01-17.01-0000 Zoning: l 1 C N/F Owner: Bonsack Baptist Church Trustees Property Address: 4850 Kingsmen Road Tax Parcel: 040.01-01-17.00-0000 Zoning: C2C Botetourt County Parcels: N/F Owner: Bank of Fincastle Property Address: Blue Ridge Boulevard Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax Parcel: 112-8 Zoning: Al N/F Owner: Shihua Zheng Property Address: Glade Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax Parcel: 1.12-10 Zoning: Al Parcel 1: Balzer & Associates, Inc. 04180070.00 BEGINNING at a point an the easterly right of way of Challenger Ave (RTE. 460), said point being the south westerly corner of the land of Bank of Fincastle (Tax Map #112-8 Botetourt County); thence S 66°14'51" E 295.54 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of Glade Creek; thence S 25010'57" W 577.17 feet more or less to a point, said point being the north easterly corner of the land of Charles W. Denton Jennings (Tax Map #040.02-01-03.00 Roanoke County); thence N 65°33'30" W 23.00 feet more or less to a point, said point being the north westerly corner of the ]and of said owner; thence S 32°26'57" W 201.04 feet more or less to a point along the westerly side of said lands; thence 5 37°21'40" W 102.24 feet more or less to a point along the westerly side of said lands; thence S 25°01'57" W 237.00 feet more or less to a point, said point being the south westerly corner of the land of said owner; thence S 68°11'37" W 186.64 feet more or less to a point; thence S 3118'01" W 157.98 feet more or less to a point, said point being a point on the northerly side of the lands of Robert A. Pack, Jr. & Juanita R. Pack (Tax Map #040.02-01-01.00 Roanoke County); thence N 70'28'31" W 121.85 feet more or less to a corner along the northerly side of said lands and on the easterly right of way of Bonsack Road (RTE. 603); thence N 1315'04" E 202.29 feet more or less to point along the right of way of said road; thence N 68'38'09" W 13.19 feet more or less to point along the right of way of said road; thence on a curve to the left, said curve having a chord bearing and distance of S 05°55'23" E 247.94 feet more or less to point along the right of way of said road; thence on a curve to the right, said curve having a chord bearing and distance of S 08°09'35" W 51.52 feet more or less to a point, said point being the right of way intersection of Bonsack Road (RTE. 603) & Challenger Ave (RTE. 460); thence N 39°10'09" E 339.91 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence S 72°02'24" E 71.87 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence N 3627'44" E 99.03 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence N 28°20'22" E 81.61 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence N 30°22'50" E 130.46 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence N 36°40'03" E 162.19 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road; thence N 3124'37" E 147.97 feet more or less to the point of BEGINNING, containing 11.032 acres more or less. Located on Challenger Ave (RTE. 460) in Roanoke County Virginia. Parcel 2: Balzer & Associates, Inc. 04180070.00 BEGINNING at a point, said point being the right of way intersection of the easterly right of way of Challenger Ave (RTE. 460) and the westerly right of way of Bonsack Road (RTE. 603); thence S 50°49'51" E 35.00 feet more or less to a point along the westerly right of way of Bonsack Road (RTE. 603); thence S 03°40'24" W 221.33 feet more or less to a point along the right of way of said road, thence S 27°34'50" W 44.71 feet more or less to a point, said point being the north westerly corner of the land of Robert A. Pack, Jr. & Juanita R. Pack (Tax Map #040.02-01-01.00 Roanoke County) and the north easterly corner of the land of the Bonsack Cemetery (Tax Map #040.14-02-16.00 Roanoke County); thence N 88005'21" W 191.60 feet more or less to a point passing the common corner of the Bonsack Cemetery and Michael D. Collins, said point being the north easterly corner of the land of Michael D. Collins (Tax Map #040.02-01-01.00 Roanoke County) and on the easterly right of way of Challenger Ave (RTE. 460); thence with the east right of way of Challenger Ave (RTE. 460) N 35°48'10" E 340.59 feet more or less to the point of BEGINNING, containing 0.727 acres more or less. Located on Challenger Ave (RTE. 460) in Roanoke County, Virginia. } z Cl? 6 5 0 \ S 6 0 $co o § g �§i 5 \ g [ o>! 3\` & a \ 4 \ 2 C) oo > y .O E < ® 0 \ 2 e 6 E / \ c/ e 0 E 0/ R\ e— \ o \ < D / U / / \ E \ / z § =z =x 3\ ER '7.. / 20 / / 'z� /� 3c= // �� 32 = U s s ®.oQL o \ / z m m m <<\o«� zz U c / 2 �C) \� OL \\_\ /\ f\ a ' \\ \ \ \ 0 7 \ 0 » \ \ \ _ / z z \ \ y 2 � \ \ r.. �t a W v U o>g o O O Lu O O �Z., O U CC) 0 �, u 0 CIO Z c N E E O O i n O _ N U E o N _ O O1 O 0 0 o O �? U N O J p Q N 9O U} -0 CD E`� N E c Q O �� 'O - O ON OX p O Q o G �� 0— Q O N An- 3 0 0) 0` xo C) o v > w_ ODf� o Q LL- i� O 00 O N N N E N U N p 00 00 10 O p N N N Q CDL �C) O O IL p o -2 O o a� Om cIq 0 0 ry � " i r �I r F 4rE Ate. .•e .� .5r� �'� k � �' :� ' .� ' �,... �. t 4 _ �: ... ,, ,., ,. — ' k . ,� ^. ,,.y j' .. � 1 z. ,e.. 4 o,. � r ; ., 4 �' � a _ � r�r _ �. —�� _ — � __ - o 4 4 °� � } F a .a _ d � •'� _ ." m .� _ 6 � �. � ' .F }. � � � "," f 4_., �. - � -.� I — .. �. "* ,� � s - .. '�{1--' ' .. � � i 1 ` sti .a • _ s. 4 1 ' � .. s � ?� - 'h- -. �_'... � r � .. •. a _ ,-. _ _. _ � �. .. _ e e � �. e _ 1. � � r, ' �. i � a � e w ` } t°' z � r _ + � � r � J yy 4• • f 9 _•. �, -• y -. 1 TJ* ! IL0 Ili . m r " � r � it � � �'��` ' .� 1 '• t � 4 •' _ �. k °"' y �6. , - F � '� ',- pp wt lit al� 40 id ' b '" '�' r 7' 1 • Y �' r - I i �'� {,� : tl, r�i''k` � - y �� I � ``•`i .. . 'I q� ! Yb �*'1 V �IA�r 5 I Iy P' •4 ' 1 � I , yy ! — , l 11' b y y I y• !4 �SLY� IL , ,• g 7•' 't. � r � " .t Aa'I. L + k � # a• i` IF `� ,1 1_ AP kI '" `L r+, ,� , , by y " I !1 • � . � ! � •� •� , � . '4 ,I 1 I � I 3. h y i4 ."5 �4 4 a; n � II � � � r!e'Y6 � �• �,! •-�Y f f �I'1i , Aji � :a" +eeyk! 4 � ,�Mf 7,lI tii, 5G ,�, 1 }I••1 iii � .5 b��» a, � �t"i � y y f ''�''ld . •� may' •� t "Ta �. r •� �, ,� •"'.: , + tet. �4�, "� ll �� ���_. f �� �. •,. L - rtes � i�• • •i r °� ' i�-�•i' ,;' '�.� �.� � -�,�� pr -, _amu -�• e5r u4,. }. � .� ,�'-- , '�Po�-' �� �� .,� +��i r +� f � ® -• �-,. •° �.��rt'�"z.. �' ' •• .fir �vr 'I zar'Ta'' .�. -. ate,.. ;�'',' �, .'�.• +� 6 T � � '� y �r�. d x m ... 4 ,. � , _ .. a :-Rr� }•' •�' � �n 1 � , § ' � � WWI rw at �� 1 . � 1 . i �� C 7 + • I� �P P do LAO a . — _ M . {: } 7�z � t ��.r. k • � 4 1 AMR ikLA . +7 �• - — '� ��� a •• f a � P * • �. �' �yF°•, -.�. .. � , all .WO IN i ��• , IL •'- ,r. d q ISP -, f k , a kk 1` j ' r la '- �••• �. Ai �.. a IP ' h. . .. - r 'fir• 1 , 1 0`. ti k `Lr I � � ��•c •��e" . � 1 , . I a rp' + 1 I� 1 r1 e F t rit - $ J +ka •'1 F y• 1: 1p rp-.ei � I 5 Y� � � i�F��.!��'" r p i i ;x Y`'" •� �, `. - � ,1 1 � �. ' =o� e � - 4. ,_�.. F �� I •, E. '' i rte. -i ,', ' ' Px Z� �4!• fi ��,44 ``mss �'ee �• ` � 1 ✓' _ � ' P y�s� "r� � _ i f d • r I ��}�,d� - Q ,+ ,baa i v f�. • 1 r Y 4 _ R.. 1- 1. `�' 11-L- 5 �} Aydr Id Tr 1.1- pk, 9• dd �� i �. � ' T r' .. A •�A q i _ I . I 1•TI� I Flb py L v c L5 + r p u N � r• t °r qr+ ae ep _ _ ` meq+ ��±` '�'�,+�' .r• �F'ti�'.,�ln _.a,A r rL r Ida IL 4 d I I •'. P e Ir LF x6I . ��'..., 1. �° A _ _ of ! + ti _ ,� '• � = 5 4 i + F -a , k•�• ,�,�� . c y • MJF' � _ +a - : d.. '�� �r�' �+�: � _ r � [ < r •� a 'S ~ . � ° , °' � a* T 5 �R �.. ... - a . �a, r - _ �y�`'. • k i a M, , S IhL, �'. fir_• �,`"s.y+'; �I ' �, ��"� _ � o ti's '� 'a _ � �. �+'' ' '� � .� � ° �,. T AW or IK 5 _ a °o it ,I r 4. ti��a iJ' F�'� r✓i � ,�,qd� . � �}' I I4.5.I , y I,, `•�.� �'^r 'IL 5 ° � # '• 'Ar" E 4k r . Al F •° i , 1 5 • h —�„ , c a s �' v • •s F .'•5 dl � r :L L • r any' 4 e � l I I , I f Hm ��� .10-,` q.•' M s..� rr '_ �.., v � f -" `'�' i I'd .. ' �-� ,{. �•, , . • _ '.. _y�s,_4,' •� -. ° tea' r t � lop ,. — y re - "rJ-. L' 1IL ILEW z ,- � �, as � . ° _: � �"° 1 • • F �. • -yT _ - 44 fNo r e ! a ,sf'• r ' gym:. � �'-y�yl5. � F,. 3�JrFM�,�}+°w.v •�y-• �' J +a� °°I , -.�. ,. a� x �'� S •P ' v " Am 'R ati Rg. • � �.: 1 _ 'i•I , 6tmi 45 — •�' _ _ �.. wt _ ,fir .- "�-�.. s J 1G+9i, .Q' F L rT-:' " k• ' Ap •i "35. . ®�, .' L - R-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose. (A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low -middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § I£, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * R -I District Regulations Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * 2. Civic Uses Cemetery * 2 R -I District Regulations Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Golf Course * 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-41-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. K R -I District Regulations b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) El C-2 District Regulations SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -Family Dwelling * Two -Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * C-2 District Regulations Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary Family Day Care Home Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Antique Shops Automobile Dealership Automobile Repair Services, Minor Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Bed and Breakfast * 2 Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General 3 C-2 District Regulations C-2 District Regulations Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Dance Hall Cl C-2 District Regulations Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213- 15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16) See. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). 6i C-2 District Regulations b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. Cel C-2 District Regulations (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) Transition: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Land Use Types: Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings are encouraged. A high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design is encouraged. Retail - Small-scale planned and clustered retail uses. Multifamily Residential - Garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. Single -Family Attached Residential - Planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre. Parks - Public and private recreational facilities. These facilities should be linked to residential areas by greenways, bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited commercial uses exist. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. SURROUNDING LAND USE - Locations which serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use patterns. ORIENTATION - Locations which are physically oriented toward the major street. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. From: Tara Scott <ami.sunset@yahoo.com> To: <amjones@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 1/16/2019 2:10 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Application for rezoning 4774 Pioneer Drive Mr. Jones, I received a letter today regarding the application to rezone this property for High Intensity Commercial District C2. Although I am in support of growth in the eastern area of Roanoke County, this rezoning raises some issues for the safety of those in the Bonsack community. The diagram of the property design shows all the traffic exiting the proposed softball field on to Glade Creek Rd. then on to Bonsack Rd. The old Bonsack community is a quiet, small community tucked in between the Blue Ridge Parkway and Challenger Ave. It is a historical community. We already have traffic issues with people driving above the speed limit on Bonsack Rd to bypass the lights at Walmart/Lowe's entrance and Cloverdale intersection. It is also QUITE DIFFICULT NOW to enter Challenger Ave from either end of Bonsack Rd in this RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. The additional traffic through this area will increase the safety risks of residents and visitors alike. I am also not sure the residents down Glad Creek Rd will be excited about having stadium lights in their backyards. The time will come when we will need a traffic light at the western end of Bonsack Rd even WITHOUT a softball complex being built. Has there been any consideration for that? Thank you. Tara Scott 4656 Afton Lane Roanoke, VA, 24012 ********************************************************************** WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. ` L. T. MCGHEE & CO.. REALTQRe P. O. BOX 667, 1211 HARDY ROAD, VINTON, VA 24179, PH 343-5718 "One of the Most Successful Real Estate Companies" WE BUY HOUSES January 16, 2019 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Planning Commission 5204 Bernard Dr Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Board Members: This letter concerns the request by Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone the 11 acres off of Rt. 46G am the developer of April's Meadow Subdivision, an exclusive subdivision in the Rt. 460 area, and I currently live there. April's Meadow is the closest subdivision to the property to be rezoned. Also, my companies own approximately 200 acres within a % mile of the property to be rezoned. We are In favor of the rezoning. We feel that it is a good use of the property and would fit better than some other commercial business. Part of this property is in the flood zone, hence, residential use is not feasible. Sincerely, Leon T. McGhee AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 ORDINANCE TO REZONE 11.03+/- ACRES FROM R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO C-2 (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT FOR A COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR SPORTS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED AT 4774 PIONEER DRIVE IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, upon the petition of Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to C-2 (High Intensity Commercial) with a proffered condition, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 5, 2019 and recommended approval of this application; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on February 12, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board approves the rezoning requested by petition of Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone the parcel located at 4774 Pioneer Drive (Tax Map No. 040.02-01-02.00-0000) from R-1 to C-2. 2. The Board accepts the voluntary proffered condition of general conformance with the "Scrappers Softball Fields -Development Plan" prepared by Balzar and Associates, Inc. dated January 30, 2019, subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. 3. The Board further finds that the proffered conditions: Page 1 of 2 a. Have a reasonable relation to the rezoning; b. Are in conformity with the comprehensive plan; c. Are clearly understood and enforceable; and d. Do not require or allow a design or standards that are less restrictive than are now covered under the County's current development regulations. 4. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice, and will not be a substantial detriment to the community. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2