Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/12/2019 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION NO. A-031219-1 ITEM NO. E_1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: March 12, 2019 Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $1,500 from the 2018 Mud Run from Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 of the Marine Corps League to Camp Roanoke Doug Blount Director of Parks Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Acceptance and allocation of $1,500 from the 2018 Mud Run and recognize Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 of the Marine Corp League for its donation to Camp Roanoke BACKGROUND: In its 23rd year, the Marine Corp Mud Run continues to be one of the Roanoke Valley's signature running and fundraising events. This event draws the interest of many individuals and its team competition has been popular with school groups, athletic teams, friends, neighbors and companies. The event represents a long standing partnership among Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 of the Marine Corp League, Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism and many local corporate sponsors. The beneficiaries of this event are the nationally recognized Marine Toys for Tots program and Camp Roanoke. The Mud Run is held annually at Green Hill Park. DISCUSSION: Funds will be used to replace the commercial stove in the cafeteria at Camp Roanoke. This year's $1,500 donation brings the total amount contributed for the twenty-three year period to over $163,000. Page 1 of 2 A presentation will be made by Michael V. Shepherd -Commandant, Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 Marine Corps League FISCAL IMPACT: The donation in the amount of $1,500 will be used to replace the commercial stove at Camp Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and allocation of the $1,500 donation to Camp Roanoke from Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 of the Marine Corps League VOTE: Supervisor Hooker moved to accept the funds. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. A-031219-2 ITEM NO. E_2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 12, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: Request to authorize the County Administrator to accept the terms and conditions of the Section 106 Treatment plan for the Bent Mountain Center Preservation Fund as promulgated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Richard Caywood Assistant County Administrator Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Request to authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement on behalf of Roanoke County to accept $500,000 in Section 106 mitigation funds to establish the Bent Mountain Center Preservation Fund. BACKGROUND: On October 13, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC for the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline project between Webster, West Virginia and Pittsylvania County, Virginia. A condition of this certificate, FERC required the completion of the processes related to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NEPA) prior to construction in areas of historical significance. Through the Section 106 process in Roanoke County, three historic districts were identified: Bent Mountain (080-5677), Bent Mountain Apple Orchard (080-5731), and Coles -Terry (080-5689) Rural Historic Districts. The Section 106 process requires the evaluation of impacts to the identified historic districts and requires mitigation efforts to help offset these impacts. MVP developed and proposed mitigation for the historic districts in Roanoke County to Page 1 of 3 include: 1) 1.8 miles of enhanced right of way restoration treatment to lessen the visual impact of the project to the surrounding properties 2) $500,000 to support the preservation of the Bent Mountains Center 3) Preparation of a PIF (Preliminary Information Form) resource information sheet for the Bent Mountain Rural Historic District and NRHP (National Register of Historic Places) nomination for the Bent Mountain and Coles -Terry Rural Historic Districts. Roanoke County staff worked with outside legal counsel, MPV, and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) in an effort to enhance the mitigation effort that MVP would be required to offer as part of the project's approval. These efforts included negotiations with MVP as well as informal and formal comment to FERC and DHR. We were successful in securing additional right of way treatment from what was originally proposed by MVP. We were unsuccessful in securing additional funding for the Bent Mountain Community Center. On March 8, 2018, the proposed treatment plan was approved by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. On March 13, 2018, the treatment plan was approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In order to establish the Bent Mountain Center Preservation Fund, Roanoke County is required to formally accept the terms and conditions set forth in the treatment plan. The conditions establish the Virginia Department of Historic Resources as the lead agency for compliance with the parameters of the Section 106 treatment plan. DISCUSSION: The County's acceptance or refusal of the $500,000 in mitigation funds to establish the Bent Mountain Center Preservation Fund does not affect FERC's approval of the MVP project. If Roanoke County does not accept these funds for use in the Bent Mountain Rural Historic District, it is our understanding that FERC will require that MVP provide these funds to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources for utilization in other historic districts impacted by the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The $500,000 associated with this agreement is indicated as a "Private Capital Contribution" on pages 116-117 of the fiscal year 2020 - fiscal year 2029 Capital Improvement Program for the Bent Mountain Center Repairs and Renovations project. If this agreement is not executed by the Board of Supervisors, the project will be under - Page 2 of 3 funded by $500,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached terms and conditions. VOTE: Supervisor Radford moved to accept the terms of the Treatment Plan. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Richard L. Caywood, Assistant County Administrator Ruth Ellen Kuhnel, County Attorney Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Page 3 of 3 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Richard L. Caywood, Assistant County Administrator Ruth Ellen Kuhnel, County Attorney Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. A-031219-3 ITEM NO. E-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 12, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the Cable Television budget for fiscal year 2019-2020 SUBMITTED BY: Elaine Bays -Murphy Director of Cable Access APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Approval of the Cable Television budget for fiscal year 2019-2020 BACKGROUND: Roanoke Valley Television, RVTV-3, serves Roanoke County, Roanoke City, the Town of Vinton and their respective school systems. RVTV-3 was created in 1993 as an agreement between the three localities to form a Government & Educational Access Station. The station is located at the Jefferson Center, and is staffed by five full time staff members. RVTV-3 produces original video productions, monthly television shows, and covers live government meetings. Programming is cablecast on Cox Communications, Channel 3 and Comcast, Channel 3, in the West County area. RVTV-3 is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the County, the City, and the Town. Mr. Jason Peters represents the Board of Supervisors, Ms. Amy Whittaker represents Roanoke County Administration and Mr. David Jones is the Member at Large. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three local governments, and is funded through the Virginia Communications Sales and Use Tax paid by Cox Communications. The budget amount paid by each locality is based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. Roanoke County's share of the cable budget is 44%. RVTV-3 staff are included in the County's payroll and benefit system. Page 1 of 3 DISCUSSION: Last year, Roanoke Valley Television produced a total of 163 video productions for the three localities and their school systems. RVTV produced the following for the County: (40) Television Shows, (34) Stand Alone Video Productions, and (22) Live Board Meetings. RVTV also provides the Live Board Meeting signal for Web Streaming. RVTV television shows include: "Roanoke County Today," "Accent Excellence," "Roanoke County Business Partners," & "Recreation Television." An entire list of video productions is included in the Budget Packet. RVTV-3 programming is uploaded to the RVTV website and social media sources. Additionally, RVTV-3 programming is posted to the websites and social media sources for Roanoke County, Roanoke City, Town of Vinton and their School Systems. The fiscal year 2019-2020 total Operating Budget is $463,413. Roanoke County's share is based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. Roanoke County's share of the cable budget is 44%. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County's share of the cable budget for fiscal year 2019-2020 is $203,902. This is an increase of $6,991 over the prior year. The County Administrator has included the County's share of funding the proposed fiscal year 2019-2020 operating budget. County staff will review the entire RVTV budget as presented to the Board of Supervisors and if deemed appropriate, recommend a technical correction to the County Administrator's budget before first reading of the budget ordinance scheduled for May 14, 2019. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee recommends approval of the fiscal year 2019-2020 RVTV Operating Budget. Page 2 of 3 VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to approve the Cable TV budget for fiscal 2019-2020. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Elaine Bays -Murphy, Director of Cable Access Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 3 of 3 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Elaine Bays -Murphy, Director of Cable Access Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 3 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 ORDINANCE 031219-4 GRANTING AND AUTHORIZING A DEED OF RELEASE OF REVERTER AND RESTRICTION TO RICHFIELD LIVING FOR A 10.31 ACRE PARCEL AND A 14.93 ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY (TAX MAP N Os . #055.09-01-19.00-0000; 055.13-01-02.01- 0000; 055.09-01-20.02-0000; and 055.09-01-15.00-0000) WHEREAS, by Deed dated September 20, 1954, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Clerk's Office"), in Deed Book 513, page 240, Grantor conveyed unto Mercy House, Incorporated a certain parcel located in Roanoke County, Virginia containing approximately 10.31 acres and more particularly described therein; and WHEREAS, by Deed dated November 21, 1955, recorded in the Clerk's Office in Deed Book 543, page 255, Grantor conveyed unto Mercy House, Incorporated a certain parcel located in Roanoke County, Virginia containing approximately 14.93 acres and more particularly described therein (both deeds are hereinafter referred to as the "Deeds" and both parcels are hereinafter referred to as the "Properties"); and WHEREAS, each of the Deeds contains provisions that each of the Properties would revert to and title thereto would be vested in the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia in the event that Mercy House, Incorporated, its successors or assigns, for any reason discontinued or ceased to operate as a non -stock, non-profit corporation (and as a convalescent home) (the "Reverter Right"). Each of the Deeds further states that the grantee needs the consent and approval of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia and the Judge of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia to sell any part of the Properties or any improvements thereon (the "Deed Restriction"); and Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, Mercy House, Incorporated has changed its corporate name several times but has continuously operated as a non -stock, non-profit corporation (and as a convalescent home) since it acquired the Properties. Richfield Living is the current name of the corporation, and Richfield Living is the sole owner of the Properties; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to release the Deed Restriction and the Reverter Right created in each of the Deeds; and WHEREAS, the request for the release of the Deed Restriction and the Reverter Right is to facilitate growth and expansion of Richfield Living, and said expansion will benefit the County by providing jobs, and necessary medical and rehabilitation facilities, such release is in the County's best interests; and WHEREAS, an emergency exists to ensure that Richfield Living can meet requisite deadlines to obtain necessary financing for such expansion and growth; and WHEREAS, a first and reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 2019, a second reading having been waived by a four-fifths vote of the Board due to an emergency; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; WHEREAS, the County has provided notice of this real estate transaction to the public by posting a legal ad and holding a public hearing. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. Page 2 of 4 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the herein -described real estate was held on March 12, 2019; the second reading and public hearing are waived due to an emergency; and 2. That County has posted the appropriate legal notice and conducted a public hearing regarding this interest in real estate; and 3. That for the reasons set forth herein, the Board deems this release of its reverter to be in the County's best interests and therefore does hereby release, revoke and terminate the Reverter Right and the Deed Restriction regarding each of the Properties in each of the Deeds for the parcels referenced herein (including, without limitation, the consent and approval right that County gave to the Judge of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in the Deeds), such Richfield Living, Inc., as a successor in interest to Mercy House, Inc., shall hereafter forever have and hold title to the Properties free and clear of the Reverter Right and Deed Restriction; and County does hereby grant, release, quitclaim and convey unto Richfield Living all of its right, title, and interest in and any claims upon each of the Properties contained in the Deeds. 4. That the County Administrator, or his designee, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Hooker to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Page 3 of 4 Peters, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A)COPY TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Cler tohe Board of Supervisors cc: Ruth Ellen Kuhnel, County Attorney Page 4 of 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 ORDINANCE 031219-5 APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $187,000 FROM COUNTY CAPITAL RESERVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE COUNTY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, Section 5-3 of the Comprehensive Financial Policy directs County staff to obtain "... an independent, professional, and comprehensive facilities assessment to ascertain the present condition of each facility ..." every seven to ten years; and WHEREAS, County staff has completed contract negotiations to complete the initial facilities assessment and held a work session to discuss the facilities assessment with the Board of Supervisors on February 12, 2019; and WHEREAS, funding for completion of the assessment is now being requested by County staff; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance before they are expended; and WHERAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 26, 2019, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 2019. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $187,000 is hereby appropriated from Capital Reserves for fiscal year 2018-2019 for the purpose of providing funding for the County Facilities Assessment. 2. This ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor Assaid to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Radford, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None Chief Deputy C cc: Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Rob Light, Director of General Services Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 yrs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 ORDINANCE 031219-6 AMENDING ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE II, SECTION 30-28, DEFINITIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted the County Zoning Ordinance, including definitions to be applied and since the enactment of that Ordinance, judicial guidance and best practices for local governments warrant changes to the County Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed and vetted through work sessions of the Planning Commission and input from stakeholders; and WHEREAS, the proposed revisions are consistent with judicial mandates and best practices; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 26, 2019, and the second reading and public hearing were held on March 12, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended as follows: SEC. 30-28. DEFINITIONS. (C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section shall have the meanings described below. Page 1 of 18 Banner. A sign applied te nlnfh paper flexible PlaStiG, nr fabFin of any Lind and geReFally i..Rte ed-te-be-displaledna-t " temporary sign of flexible materials affixed to a framework or flat surface. Illegal signs: A sign erected without a required permit or which otherwise does not comply with any provisions of this Ordinance. Minor sign: A permanent wall mounted or freestanding sign not exceeding three (3) square feet in area, not exceeding four (4) feet in height, and not illuminated. Public art: Items expressing creative skill or imagination in a visual form, such as painting or sculpture, which are intended to beautify or provide aesthetic influences to public areas which are visible from the public realm. Wvr.R.� ""`l� (96t lig"m , gsGG16; S��e,GF aot+V ifs Any object, device, display, or structure, or part thereof, visible from a public right-of-way open to use by the general public which is designed and used to attract attention to an institution, organization, business, product, service, event, or location by any means involving words, letters, Page 2 of 18 figures, design, symbol, fixtures, logos, colors, illumination, or projected images. The term does not include public art, architectural elements incorporated into the style or function of a building, or flags of any nation, state, or other geopolitical entity. The term "sign" also does not include the display of merchandise for sale on the site of the display. Sign face: The portion of a sign structure bearing the message. Temporary sign when displayed ssE?G . A sign constructed of cloth, canvas, vinyl, paper, plywood, fabric, or other lightweight material not well suited to provide a durable substrate or, if made of some other material, is neither permanently installed in the ground nor permanently affixed to a building or structure which is permanently installed in the ground. ARTICLE V — DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEC. 30-93. SIGNS. Sec. 30-93-1. Purpose. Finding, purpose and intent; interpretation. Page 3 of 18 (A) Signs obstruct views, distract motorists, displace alternative uses for land, and pose other problems that legitimately call for regulation. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the size, color, illumination, movement, materials, location, height and condition of all signs placed on private property for exterior observation, thus ensuring the protection of property values, the character of the various neighborhoods, the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community, protection against destruction of or encroachment upon historic areas, and the safety and welfare of pedestrians and wheeled traffic while providing convenience to citizens and encouraging economic development. This ordinance allows adequate communication through signage while encouraging aesthetic quality in the design, location, size and purpose of all signs. This ordinance shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. If any provision of this article is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such finding shall not affect the validity of other provisions of this article which can be given effect without the invalid provision. (B) Signs not expressly permitted as being allowed by right or by special use permit under this ordinance, by specific requirements in another portion of this ordinance, or otherwise expressly allowed by the Board of Supervisors are forbidden. (C) A sign placed on land or on a building for the purpose of identification, protection or directing persons to a use conducted therein shall be deemed to be an integral but accessory and subordinate part of the principal use of land or building. Therefore, the intent of this ordinance is to establish limitations on signs in order to ensure they are appropriate to the land, building or use to which they are appurtenant and are adequate for their intended purpose while balancing the individual and community interests identified in subsection (A) of this section. Page 4 of 18 (D) These regulations are intended to promote signs that are compatible with the use of the property to which they are appurtenant, landscape and architecture of surrounding buildings, are legible and appropriate to the activity to which they pertain, are not distracting to motorists, and are constructed and maintained in a structurally sound and attractive condition. (E) These regulations distinguish between portions of the County designed for primarily vehicular access and portions of the County designed for primarily pedestrian access. (F) These regulations do not regulate every form and instance of visual speech that may be displayed anywhere within the jurisdictional limits of the County. Rather, they are intended to regulate those forms and instances that are most likely to meaningfully affect one or more of the purposes set forth above. (G) These regulations do not entirely eliminate all of the harms that may be created by the installation and display of signs. Rather, they strike an appropriate balance that preserves ample channels of communication by means of visual display while still reducing and mitigating the extent of the harms caused by signs. Sec. 30-93-3. Exempted Signs. (A) The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within the county without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service: gevemmental bedy7Signs erected by a governmental body or required by Page 5 of 18 -5-.2. Street address signs, not exceeding ten (10) square feet in size. display aRY ethep message. 44-3. Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-way; are erected or constructed in accordance with the structural and safety requirements of the building code, if applicable; are not located in the sight distance triangle at a road intersection; do not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian travel; and do not obstruct the view of the property street address and street name. 4-3-.4. Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in sections 30-93-4(A)5. and 7., which shall not be excluded. Page 6 of 18 5. Temporary signs as follows: a. Any signs no more than 96 square feet, located on property where a building permit is active. b. On any property for sale, rent or lease in residential and agricultural zoned districts, one of more signs with a total area up to 32 square feet in total size. All other zoning districts shall be limited up to 60 square feet in size. c. Official notices or advertisements posted or displayed by or under the direction of any public or court officer in the performance of his official or directed duties; provided, that all such signs shall be removed no more than ten (10) days after their purpose has been accomplished. d. On residential zoned property, one or more, temporary signs with a total area of no more than 16 square feet, and which are removed within 30 days of being erected. 6. Not more than two minor signs per parcel. Additional minor signs are permitted in certain districts with a permit. Sec. 30-93-4. Prohibited Signs. (A) The following signs are prohibited within the county: 1 .R. st.R,r__t. A.s nr ,-liror+inns Signs simulating, or which are likely to be confused with, a traffic control sign or any other sign displayed by a public authority. Any such sign is subject to immediate removal and disposal by an authorized County official as a nuisance. Page 7 of 18 Any sign or portion thereof that rotates, or otherwise moves through the use of electrical or wind power. This prohibition does not include the changing of messages on electronic message boards. Signs advertising activities or products that are illegal under federal, state, or county law. Any sign that obstructs any building door, window, or other means of egress. 4$�-' Any electrical sign that does not display the UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC label, unless such sign is constructed, installed, and inspected in accordance with section 30-93-9(B). 44-.10. Signs or sign structures that are erected on, or extend over, a piece of property without the expressed written permission of the property owner or the owner's agent. 411. Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering a public right-of-way from private property. 412. Portable signs. 4413. Roof signs. 45-14. Any temporary sign(s) displayed on a stationary motor vehicle or trailer when the vehicle or trailer is parked or oriented for the purpose of serving the function of a sign, except when such vehicle or trailer is parked in the operator's driveway or when the vehicle is parked to the side or rear of a commercial building and is not visible from adjacent public roads or is loading or unloading. Sec. 30-93-8. Temporary Signs. (A) Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant to section 30-93-5 and 30-93-15. EXGE?p+ aG nrn„ided in cr nc�on+inns /R\ anrd (G) be!G , nortaininn +n Foal A -Rd nnnc+rr rn+inn Signe +Temporary signs shall comply with the following standards: Each business or non-residential use on a lot shall be allowed to display one (1) temporary sign at any time during a calendar year. Any temporary sign secured to a temporary fixture or post must meet the minimum sign setback, per Section 30- 93-15, from the property line, adjacent to the right-of-way. Each business or non - Page 8 of 18 residential use wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a temporary sign permit. Temporary sign permits shall expire at the end of each calendar year. Sec. 30-93-12. Damaged or Neglected Signs. (A) The building commissioner of county shall have the authority to order the removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses an steer immediate and imminent danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. (B) All signs shall be constructed and mounted in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (C) All signs and components thereof shall be maintained in good repair and in a safe, neat and clean condition. (D) The owner of any advertising sign, other than a permitted off -premises sign, located on commercial property where the use or business has ceased operating shall, within 60 days of the cessation of use or business operation, replace the sign with a blank face until such time as a use or business has resumed operating on the property. Page 9 of 18 (E) Any sign which becomes a safety hazard of which is not kept in a reasonably good state of repair shall be put in a safe and good state of repair within 30 days of a written notice to the owner and permit holder. (F) Any sign which constitutes a nuisance may be abated by the County of Roanoke under the requirements of Virginia Code §§ 15.2-900, 15.2-906, and/or 15.2-1115. Sec. 30-93-13. District Regulations. Page 10 of 18 Page 11 of 18 Page 12 of 18 Page 13 of 18 Page 14 of 18 Page 15 of 18 Generally, signage regulations, including allowable square footage, maximum number of signs, minimum setback and height, based on zoning districts, shall comply with the following table Maximum total square footage based on road frontage: District Type Permitted Size (each/total s.f. max) Maximum Sign Area Minimum Setback Maximum Height Location Temporary 1 maximum/ 32 s.f. 32 s.f. AG -3 5 feet 15 feet Freestanding and or Attached AG -1 0.25 s.f per 1 I.f. Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet of lot or Attached frontage Page 16 of 18 Page 17 of 18 Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/32 s.f. 32 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet or Attached AV 1 s.f. per Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/400 s.f. 1 Lf. of lot 5 feet 15 feet or Attached frontage Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/ 32 s.f. 32 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet AR, R- or Attached 1, R-2, R-3, R- 4 and 0.5 s.f. R -MH per 1 Lf. Freestanding Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet of lot or Attached frontage Freestanding Temporary 1 maximum/ 60 s.f. 60 s.f. 5 feet 15 feet or Attached C-1, C- 2, 1-1 and 1-2 1.5 s.f. Proposed: per 1 I.f. **See **See Freestanding Permanent Options 5 maximum/500 s.f. of lot Below: Options or Attached frontage Below: Options for sign setbacks and height in the C-1, C-2, 1-1 and 1-2 zoned districts: Option 1 **This option can only be used in the freestanding sign meets the definition of a monument sign, per Section 30-28. Minimum sign setback from front property line: five (5) feet. Maximum sign height: seven (7) feet. Option 2 Minimum sign setback from front property line: ten (10) feet. Page 17 of 18 Maximum sign height: fifteen (15) feet. Option 3 Minimum sign setback from front property line: fifteen (15) feet. Maximum sign height: twenty-five (25) feet. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet of signage. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Hooker, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A VOPY TESTE: Deborah C. JacksX / Chief Deputy Clerk td the! Board of Supervisors cc: Philip Thompson, Acting Director of Planning John Murphy, Zoning Administrator Page 18 of 18 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-7.b EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO CHARLES R. HILL, ACCOUNTS COORDINATOR, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER THIRTY-ONE (31) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Mr. Hill was employed by Roanoke County on a part-time basis from October 1987 through June of 1988 and on a full-time basis from November 7, 1988 through February 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hill retired on March 1, 2019, after thirty-one (31) years of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Hill's tenure, he has served as an Account Clerk II in the Commissioner of the Revenue's Department; Tax Clerk I in the Commissioner of the Revenue's Department; Account Clerk in the Finance Department, and Accounts Coordinator in the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department and WHEREAS, throughout Mr. Hill's tenure, he served with an extensive level of knowledge in accounting and budgeting practices that earned the respect and admiration of his colleagues throughout Roanoke County, and served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to CHARLES R. HILL II for thirty-one (31) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Assaid, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None PY TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks; Chief Deputy Clerk t e Board of Supervisors Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. A -031219-7.d ITEM NO. K_5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 12, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept audited financial results for Roanoke County Public Schools for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Rebecca Owens Assistant County Administrator Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Accept audited financial results for the Roanoke County Public Schools for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. BACKGROUND: Historically, the School year end information is provided to the Board as part of the County of Roanoke year-end report. However, the timing of the report presentation this year did allow this to occur. This report is being provided for the Board's information and acceptance of the audited financial results for June 30, 2018. DISCUSSION: The Schools ended the year with revenues $1.12 million more than final budget and expenditure savings of $5.11 million, net of outstanding purchase orders. Attached is the year-end report the School Board approved at their Board meeting on December 13, 2018. No action is required by the Board of Supervisors for the allocation of year end funds. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Comprehensive Financial Policy designates the allocation of year end funds. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board accept the audited financial results for Roanoke County Public Schools for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to accept the audited financial results. Supervisor Assaid seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Rebecca Owens, Assistant County Administrator Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Rebecca Owens, Assistant County Administrator Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. A -031219-7.e ITEM NO. K-6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 12, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $3,000 for the Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) Educational Grant Program SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Susan Slough Assistant Director of Communications and Technology Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $3,000 in grant funding from the Virginia Information Technology Agency Public Safety Access Point (PSAP) program. BACKGROUND: The Virginia Information Technologies Agency awards grant funds from 911 user taxes. The purpose of the program is to financially assist Virginia primary Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) with the purchase of equipment, services and training that support the continuity and enhancement of wireless E-911. DISCUSSION: Each year the Roanoke County E-911 Center has applied for, and been awarded, an educational grant, provided by the Virginia E-911 Services Board. This grant is used to offset the expense of training. FISCAL IMPACT: Awarded grant funds total $3,000. No local matching funds are required. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting and allocating $3,000 for the Public Safety Access Point grant program. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to accept and allocate the funds. Supervisor Assaid seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Susan Slough, Assistant Director of Communications and Information Technology Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Susan Slough, Assistant Director of Communications and Information Technology Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Laurie Gearheart, Acting Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-7.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LEIGHBURN DRIVE OF BUCKLAND SOUTH INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of State highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Assaid, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A PY TESTE: Deb ah C. Jac s Chief Deputy Clerkto a Board of Supervisors cc: Tarek Moneir, Acting Director of Development Services Virginia Department of Transportation Page 2 of 2 Exhibit «p„' VICINITYMAP. r I 2a i iY NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF I.EIGHBURN DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SYSTEM S of ,, ® 79 5 ; f e © a3 ` Q O 4 i PROPOSED ADDITION(S) SHOWN IN BLUE RIGHT ROADWAY DESCRIPTION LENGTH OF WAY WIDTH SERVICES Miles Feet Feet Houses [_eighburn Drive from the intersection with Barrens Rd (UA SEC. Route # 797) to the cul-de-sac. 0.15 40 30 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SYSTEM S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SCONDARY COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SYSTEM In the County of Roanoke ...... ..........•........................................................................................... By resolution of the governing bodLtedFePbmaryf1 6, 2019 The following MOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incothe g vernr g body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Q,(j'ici Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Stati Aghways BoiecHSubdivision auckiand South Subdivision Iypa Change to the Secondary System of State HlgbVMnL Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginla Statute: §33.2.705 1.eighbum 0", Stals Route Mumt►er 2027 Old Route ttwnber. 0 —..._—_--... ---._..._.w...._,._.. -- — - s From: Interaedon wRh Barrens RoadlRoute 787 Tv End of Cube -sac on LeVWn Driv% a distance of, 045 miles. Reconklon Rebrence: Instnment #201411876 Right of Way wk2h (feet) = 0 VD0T Fmro AMAJ (QW007) MainkrwWc Division Date of Resolution: February 26, 2019 Page I of I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-7.g REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 1110, LOCUST GROVE LANE; ROUTE 1374 (UNNAMED); ROUTE 645, CROSSMILL LANE; ROUTE 612, BARLEY DRIVE; GLENVAR MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0011-080-108, C-501, the Route 11/460 Widening Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketches and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, define adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0011-080-108, C-501; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - Page 1 of 2 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Assaid, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None TESTE: Deborah C. Jacksl / Chief Deputy Clerk fo t e Board of Supervisors cc: David Holladay, Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation Page 2 of 2 11 460 0.03 miles Rte. 1110 Secondary Abandonment 0.05 miles m s Virginia Department of Tronsporlation \DOT OFFICE OF LAND USE p�na> January 16,2019 Rte. 1110 Secondary Addition 0.06 miles UPC -- 17698 SHEET 1 OF 3 Salem District Salem Residency Lege nd ROANOKE COUNTY Changes in the Secondary Systems due to relocation and construction on Project: 0011-080-108, C-501 - Segment(s) of Secondary Road location to be abandoned. Segment(s) of new location to be added to the Secondary System. Data Correction - Adjustment to correct RIMS records also applies to Route Re -Numbering, an Administrative change. In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing body adopted March 12, 2019 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and inco71" raled as part of the gorning body's resolution for changes in the secondary system ofstate highways. 17 A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Secondary System of StaWHighways Project/Subdivision 0011-080-108, C-501 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: Street Name and/or Route Number Barley Drive, State Route Number 612 Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT ROUTE 11/460 To: 0.06 MI S INT ROUTE 830, a distance of: 0.06 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Locust Grove Lane, State Route Number 1110 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- 0 From: INT ROUTE 11/460 To: 0.05 MI NORTH INT ROUTE 11/460, a distance of: 0.05 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Crossmill Lane, State Route Number 645 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT ROUTE 11/460 To: 0.06 MI N INT ROUTE 11/460, a distance of: 0.06 miles. VDOT Fonn AM -4.3 (4/20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: March 12, 2019 Page I of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Project/Subdivision 0011-080-108, C-501 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705 Street Name and/or Route Number Crossmill Lane, State Route Number 645 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT ROUTE 11/460 To: 0.07 MI N INT ROUTE 11/460, a distance of: 0.07 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Locust Grove Lane, State Route Number 1110 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT ROUTE 11/460 To: 0.06 MI NORTH INT ROUTE 11/460, a distance of: 0.06 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number , State Route Number 1374 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT RTE 1170 To: END, T -Turnaround, a distance of: 0.09 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Barley Drive, State Route Number 612 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: INT ROUTE 830 To: 0.11 MI N INT ROUTE 830, a distance of: 0.11 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4/20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. A -031219-7.h ITEM NO. K_9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 12, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointments to the Economic Development Authority (EDA) SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointment to the EDAs BACKGROUND: Steve Anderson's appointment to the EDA, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District expired September 26, 2017. Kyle Richardson's appointment to the EDA, representing the Catawba Magisterial District expired September 26, 2018. DISCUSSION: Supervisor George Assaid has recommended the appointment of Steve Anderson to a four-year term to expire September 26, 2023. Supervisor Martha Hooker has recommended the appointment of Kyle Richardson to a four-year term to expire September 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the recommendation to reappoint Steve Anderson to represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District for an additional four-year term and Kyle Richardson to represent the Catawba Magisterial District for an additional four-year term. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to confirm the appointments. Supervisor Assaid seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development Page 2 of 2 Yes No Absent Mr. Assaid ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Ms. North ® ❑ ❑ cc: Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-7.a EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO VICKI L. BENNINGER, BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III, UPON HER RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN TWENTY-NINE (29) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Ms. Benninger was employed by Roanoke County on May 1, 1989; and WHEREAS, Ms. Benninger retired on March 1, 2019, after twenty-nine (29) years and ten (10) months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Ms. Benninger's tenure, she has served as a Systems Analyst, Programmer Analyst and Business Systems Analyst III on the Application Services Team in the Communications and Information Technology Department and has served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; WHEREAS, Ms. Benninger worked with Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools' Finance departments to support and assist them with FIN, KPMG Performance, Microsoft Dynamics AX and other systems providing General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, General Billing, Budget, Payroll, Purchasing, Credit Card Payments, and Check Security. She provided thorough system documentation, installation, data conversion, testing, analysis and business models needed for system requirements, training, user support and reporting. Her interface skills were invaluable in connecting multiple internal and external systems, reducing duplication of data and effort and providing enhanced data for organizing, reviewing and analyzing all types of financial data. WHEREAS, Ms. Benninger began her Roanoke County career developing programs with Microfocus Cobol for small systems such as Cashiering and FIN, she progressed to Page 1 of 2 skillfully supporting many types of newer technologies. She provided support for the first relational database installation at Roanoke County, Sybase, and the first client/server based application; these technologies were the framework for KPMG's Performance Financials modules. She advanced to very complex system support for the Microsoft Dynamics AX multi -tiered Microsoft environment with SQL, Remote Desktop Servers, SharePoint and virtual servers. She worked alongside technology and financial teams to develop a detailed and thorough knowledge for functional and technical areas; and developed multiple interfaces and integration methods for Payroll and Financial systems; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to VICKI L. BENNINGER for more than twenty-nine (29) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Assaid, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to th Page 2 of 2 Board of Supervisors AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — November 20, 2018 2. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Vicki L. Benninger, Business Systems Analyst 111, upon her retirement after more than twenty-nine (29) years of service 3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Charles R. Hill, Accounts Coordinator, upon his retirement afterthirty- one (31) years of service 4. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Melba L. McGhee, Family Services Specialist, upon her retirement after more than twelve (12) years of service 5. Request to accept audited financial results for Roanoke County Public Schools for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 6. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $3,000 for the Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) Educational Grant Program 7. Resolution requesting acceptance of Leighburn Drive of Buckland South into the Virginia Department of Transportation System 8. Resolution requesting changes in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of State Highways, Route 1110, Locust Grove Lane, Route 1374 (unnamed), Route 645, Crossmill Lane, and Route 612, Barley Drive 9. Confirmation of appointment to the Economic Development Authority (EDA) (District) Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Assaid, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 RESOLUTION 031219-8 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker, the motion was carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None Chief Deputy Page 1 of 1 of Supervisors