Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/14/2020 - Regular January 14, 2020 1 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of January 2020. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman North called the meeting to order at 2:09 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Supervisors Martha B. Hooker, Paul M. Mahoney, David R. Radford, P. Jason Peters and Phil C. North MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Daniel R. O'Donnell, County Administrator; Richard Caywood, Assistant County Administrator; Rebecca Owens, Assistant County Administrator; Amy Whittaker, Public Information Officer, Peter S. Lubeck, Acting County Attorney and Deborah C. Jacks, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board IN RE: ORGANIZATION OF COUNTY BOARD 1. Election of Officers a. Chairman Supervisor Hooker nominated Supervisor Radford to serve as Chairman. Supervisor North seconded the nomination. Supervisor Radford was elected by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None 2 January 14, 2020 b. Vice Chairman Supervisor Hooker nominated Supervisor North to serve as Vice Chairman. Supervisor Radford seconded the nomination. Supervisor North was elected by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None Chairman Radford recessed the meeting at 2:03 P.M. IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES Before the meeting was called to order, an invocation was provided by Spiritual Growth Pastor Kevin Wilson of Fellowship Community Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. Chairman Radford called the meeting to back into open session at 3:00 p.m. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution appointing the County Attorney and approval of an employment contract (Phil C. North, Supervisor, Hollins Magisterial District) There was no discussion. RESOLUTION 011420-1 APPOINTING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND APPROVAL OF AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Chapter 7 of the Roanoke County Charter provides for the appointment of a County Attorney, his or her powers and duties, compensation and tenure; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-1542 of the Code of Virginia establishes the various duties and responsibilities of the County Attorney; and WHEREAS, an employment agreement between the County Attorney and the Board of Supervisors has been negotiated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: January 14, 2020 3 1. That Peter S. Lubeck, subject to acceptance of the terms and conditions of employment as set forth in the employment agreement, is hereby appointed County Attorney for Roanoke County, and that his tenure shall commence on or before January 14, 2020. 2. That Peter S. Lubeck shall exercise all of the powers and fulfill all of the duties and obligations of County Attorney as provided in the Roanoke County Charter, the position description, the policies and regulations adopted by the Board and the legal directives of the Board. 3. That an employment agreement is hereby approved, and the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute this agreement of behalf the Board. On motion of Supervisor Hooker to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Mahoney and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Mahoney asked to pull the approval of the minutes of the October 22, 2019, Board Meeting for a separate vote as he was not on the Board when this meeting was held. There were no objections. On motion of Supervisor Radford to approve the minutes, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Mahoney A-011420-2 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM H- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for, designated as Item H - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutcs Octobcr 22, 201-9 4 January 14, 2020 2. Request to accept and allocate a $5,000 grant to the Fire and Rescue Department from ADT, LLC 3. Resolution approving an amended and restated employment contract for the County Administrator 4. Confirmation of appointments to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors, Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT), Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission (District), Planning Commission (District) and South Peak Community Development Authority (At-Large) On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution, with the approval of minutes pulled for separate action, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A-011420-3.a RESOLUTION 011420-3.b AMENDING AND RESTATING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT111 WHEREAS, on December 4, 2018, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved the appointment of Daniel R. O'Donnell as County Administrator and executed a contract on that same day by Resolution 120418-5; and WHEREAS, the contract states that any amendment must be by written agreement; and WHEREAS, the Board and Mr. O'Donnell desire to amend the existing contract to amend and clarify certain terms to reflect the current relationship. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The current Employment Agreement of the County Administrator, Daniel R. O'Donnell, is hereby amended to clarify certain benefits and provide for a 2.75% salary increase. 2. The Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to sign the attached Amendment to reflect changes to the original Employment Agreement, which Amendment is hereby made a part of this Resolution. (Attachment) On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A-011420-3.c January 14, 2020 5 IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS William Skaff of 4815 Farmington Place Court stated, "Chairman North provided us with some wonderful news about Roanoke County's economy in his excellent State of the County Address: (1) Announced new business will create 800 new jobs; (2) Unemployment is at 2.2 percent; (3) Innovation industries, such as technology and healthcare, are the focus; (4) Population will increase 3.3 percent in ten years; and (5) Young people ages 25 to 39 are leaving big cities for the suburbs in droves. All of this is happening now to Roanoke County just the way it is, without the completion of a single town center density development project. So, have we run out of reasons yet for ruining our County with density development? We retain our young people by preserving for them the best version of Roanoke County, not by importing an inferior version from urban areas. Amidst the good news there are two ominous notes. First, the admission that "the County's planning studies are long term efforts to discover areas for growth and revitalization across major County corridors." This tells us that the government's Reimagine town center density development program extends beyond the III 12 projects currently contemplated by the Planning and Economic Development Departments. The effort to urbanize Roanoke County is, we now know, intended to be perpetual and will be implemented wherever possible. The second ominous note is the potential of government decisions being influenced by the interests of those with a financial stake in density development: "We encourage interested commercial developers to help us advance these ideas sooner rather than later." The question occurs, to what extent have developer attitudes and preferences helped enshrine density development as public policy, regardless of the source, whether it be developers or the Board, the Planning Commission, and the Economic Development Department themselves? Developers are primarily, if not solely, concerned with development—their business is building, not what and whether we should build. Progress is not building as many buildings as possible as large,as possible as close together as possible. Planners and developers assume that progress is urbanization. True progress is preserving quality of life while the population and the built environment increase. For Roanoke County, it is a balance, a mutual presence, locally as well as regionally, between the natural and the built. The Board has made Constitutionalist decisions, such as approving the Second Amendment Sanctuary Resolution, and socialist decisions, such as the Reimagine 419 Plan, whereby government creates development plans for private property and then compels, or entices, owners into adopting them, all with taxpayer dollars. Constitutionalism limits government in order to preserve and protect the individual's liberty and natural rights. Socialism subsumes the individual under an unlimited government that can control any aspect of life, including private property, through intrusive ordinances and coercive practices. These two political philosophies are diametrically opposed there can be no compromise between them. Respectfully, may I suggest that the Board determine which side it is on." 6 January 14, 2020 IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Hooker moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of November 3, 2019 IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Peters welcomed Mr. Mahoney to the Board, and congratulated Mr. Radford as the new Chairman noted he knew he would do a great job. 2020 will be a great year for our County. Supervisor Mahoney congratulate Mr. Radford and thanked him for contacting him last week so that both of them could attend the winter basketball classic at the Berglund Center. He thanked Mayor Sherman Lea for inviting them and Chris Craft for his help in getting them there. It was a good time and there were four of the School Board members that joined them and thinks it was a very nice event that Mayor Lea has put on and give a lot of credit to Hidden Valley; they played a close back and even went ahead late in the second half and almost one. The other item that he raised was an email he received from Chief Hall that indicated how his department is working with citizens in setting up neighborhood watch meeting. He was using this forum to reach out to citizens in Cave Spring to indicate there is a Cave Spring neighborhood watch meeting on Monday, January 20, 2020, he knows it is Martin Luther King Day, but it is going to be at St. John's Lutheran Church and on.Wednesday, January 22, 2020, a Penn Forest neighborhood watch meeting will be at South County Library. The few neighborhood watch meeting that he has attended did not have a lot of citizens, but he does know from emails, there are a lot of citizens concerned about issues and they are trying to organize neighborhood watch meetings. Supervisor Hooker stated that she too wanted to welcome Mr. Mahoney; it is a pleasure to have him with the rest of the Board. They will appreciate his wisdom in coming years and also want to welcome Peter (Mr. Lubeck). We really are voting in your loyalty, we trust you and welcome. We are happy to have him. The third thing is she had the pleasure of attending the Ft. Lewis Volunteer Firefighter Banquet with Chief Simon last Saturday. It was really a great event. There were three volunteers that cumulatively had 125 years retire and she had the honor of visiting with them briefly at January 14, 2020 7 that banquet and would publically like to thank them again. It is really such an act of service for them to be doing that for that long. We have Mr. David Carroll, 42 years of service; Danny Carroll, 42 years of service and Michael Glass who had 41 years of service. It was a great moment in time with such leadership, such service to the community and they loved it. Thank you again to those gentlemen and for their service. Also, she thanked Mr. North for an outstanding year of service. Thank you for your leadership and chairmanship; we appreciate it. Thank you David (Mr. Radford) for being Chairman this year. Supervisor North welcomed Supervisor Mahoney for your first meeting and many more. We look forward to working with you. Congratulations to Mr. Radford, don't wish for want you want, you might get it. Everything will work out fine, we will be there for your. Mr. Lubeck, we look forward to working with you as well. Not only on everyday legal things as we have from time to time, but also on our legislative agenda coming up this year. As we begin another year, let us build on what we have achieved in the last few years and be mindful of the goals that we will set soon and work on in the coming years. Lastly, there is no end to what we can do if we had endless dollars, but we all know that is not the case, nor will ever be the case. So, we must be mindful of the needs and the wants and acknowledge that everything will be well in the end. If we work our noble diagram, our plan, we will be successful. We do have a meeting coming up in Hollins, updating the Hollins community on all the transportation projects and other things we have going on there. It will be held on January 23, 2020, at 6:30 p.m. at the Hollins Library meeting room. Supervisor Radford stated he too wanted to welcome Mr. Mahoney; looking forward to these next two years and maybe some more basketball games. In his district, Cave Spring High School, is in his district and has students that go their also so is split between Hidden Valley and Cave Spring. He too welcomed Mr. Lubeck and is looking forward to working with him and seeking counsel. He is going to visit, this Thursday, the Fire and Rescue station in his area and is going to be visiting Cave Spring, Bent Mountain, Back Creek and basically is going to spend six (6) hours with them and the other Board members have done in the past. He will get to see how the department operates there and learn a little bit more about them; looking forward to that. Lastly, the Economic Development Department is hosting a workshop, Financing and Business on January 29, 2020, from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. at the South County Library. This is a free workshop that teaches new and existing businesses how to seek financing and the lending process to secure capital for growth opportunities. If you are interested in attending, contact the Economic Development office at 772-2185. Also, the Gauntlet is starting up in a month. Any small businesses interested in getting into that contact Anita Patterson. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING 8 January 14, 2020 At 3:19 p.m., Supervisor Mahoney moved to go into closed meeting following the work sessions pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.2-3711 a .5 — discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community; namely in the Catawba Magisterial District. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None The closed session was held from 6:15 p.m. until 6:47 p.m. At 3:30 p.m. Chairman Radford recessed to the 4th Floor for work session and closed meeting. IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session with the Board of Supervisors: (a) to review proposed changes to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance to provide stream buffers during land development and (b) proposed changes to the Floodplain requirements within the Zoning Ordinance (Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services) In attendance was Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services; David Henderson, County Engineer; Butch Workman, Stormwater Operations Manager and Richard Caywood, Assistant County Administrator. Mr. O'Donnell provided overview. Mr. Henderson and Mr. Moneir went through a PowerPoint presentation. The work session was held from 3:34 p.m. until 4:45 p.m. A break was taken from 4:26 p.m. until 4:34 p.m. January 14, 2020 9 Supervisor Radford stated he had some concerns. Staff mentioned talking to the homebuilders and other consultants. How about other stakeholders around the community; community groups, upper Roanoke River group. Mr. Henderson responded anyone in an environment group would want us to be more restrictive, but staff did not reach out to them. We saw it as more of a development issue. We could reach out to more of those groups. We are trying to "thread the needle" of having reasonable controls. DEQ does not consider a stream buffer a stream buffer until it is one hundred feet (100') wide. Supervisor Radford then asked why science or hydrology did staff use. Mr. Henderson responded it was not hard science; it is known if you have sheet flow that goes through a vegetative buffer, it will help filter out pollutants. Certainly, the wider it is the better from that standpoint. The 25' width was determined as to what we thought was reasonable. Also, his experience shows that where we have had development, we have had steep hill slopes and we have floods. Those are areas that Mr. Workman has issues with, slopes failing, eroding and having property owners call with questions and issues. Supervisor Radford then stated staff stated in the beginning that this is going to cover all the streams so it is like one size fits all. How do you differentiate your buffer? Mr. Henderson stated it would be a 25 buffer. Supervisor Radford inquired regardless of a classification with Mr. Henderson advised that is the way it is written and less than 25 would lose most, if not all, of the benefit. Supervisor Radford asked if they were talking about along the streams not a crossing with Mr. Henderson advising in the negative, along the stream. Supervisor Mahoney asked if staff could guess as to what possible beneficial impact this would have on the waste load allocation. Mr. Henderson responded in the negative. Is this the best remedy we can come up with? Mr. Henderson responded it depends on how you define best. One of the remedies could be a more stringent dog waste ordinance and show that we enforce it. There is a whole laundry list that the State has. Supervisor Mahoney stated in terms of trying the issue of sediment in streams. Mr. Henderson stated there were other ways to do it. We could do more capital projects. His thought has been that the best way to address our sediment discharge issues is to trying to keep it from being discharged in the first place and by doing this, he believes it would help. In the upper reaches it would help our stream banks and our over banks to have less erosion issues overall. I have not quantified it, but in twenty-four months he will have to quantify it for the State. Supervisor Mahoney stated he has seen alternatives, put big rocks on the bank. He knows folks that live at the lake have some affirmative obligations to do all kind of planting right along the bank leading into the lake. There you can go right up to the edge of the water. So, he is trying to think of what other realistic alternatives other than this. I 0 January 14, 2020 Mr. Henderson responded that stream buffer met a couple of different things and at the lake you are going right up to the water's edge because you are really not worrying about storage. This would benefit the actual property by lessening erosion, but it would also benefit downstream properties by maintaining any existing flood storage that might be on that lot instead of allowing it to be completely filled in all the way to the edge of the stream. There would be some storm storage. Supervisor Mahoney then asked who comes up with the high-water mark. Is that something that the feds give us? Mr. Henderson advised there is a definition in the ordinance and frankly for these smaller streams he does not feel there would be much conflict. Basically, the design engineer will come and look at in the field. Supervisor Mahoney asked if this was similar to what the State has required in those jurisdictions that are subject to the Chesapeake Bay provisions where if you are a farmer and have agricultural property there are certain buffers you have to adhere to. Mr. Henderson states it is similar, but much less; with the Chesapeake Bay you have a fifty-foot (50') wide initial buffer and then it extends another one hundred and fifty feet (150') beyond that So, some of the language is similar, but it much more geographically constrained. Mr. Moneir commented that when they started looking at this, they took into consideration the impact on the developers. Supervisor Mahoney responded he was going to get to that and did staff have a gestimate as to what that cost is with Mr. Moneir responding in the negative. Anytime you touch erosion and sediment ordinance, you are going to get emotion from the developer, i.e. it is going to add costs that transfer into the cost of housing. He does not know how to remedy that. DEQ seems to be happy with what we are doing; they did not object. Supervisor Mahoney stated his concern is with localities are struggling to come up with affordable housing and we add another $10,000 to the cost of a single- family home or $5,000, how many citizens are we cutting out of an opportunity to buy a home. If he is a developer and because of this he has 18 lots instead of 20, is that a problem. He thinks it is. The other issue he has is he has a problem with intermittent streams and know in his prior life there was a lot of debate and discussion over what is an intermittent stream and what do we do with them. He has a problem with it, but the County Attorney is going to provide him with case decisions from other jurisdictions that indicate is not a problem. He thinks there are some mind fields here, while he likes the idea of trying to satisfy our MS4 requirements and thinks we have to do something with the sediment and everything else that goes into the streams. He has some concerns about impacts that we have not considered and really has a problem with intermittents. January 14, 2020 11 Mr. Caywood responded he likes the idea of using the drainage area as a way to get out of the debate. If you use the 100 acre cut off is helpful and finally, he thinks this gets at some of the things that Mr. Workman spends a lot of time correcting after the fact. Having a buffer and getting the fill away from the edge of streams does help with the erosion you see after storms and we spend a lot of money "after the fact." In addition to the environmental benefit, he does think you get benefits from the storm maintenance program. So there is the flood piece, the erosion prevention piece, which is the environmental piece that work together. He does think we have a lot of ability, through our definition define with our whole universe of streams determine where we want to make the cut off. The further upstream you get, the benefits start to go down. Supervisor Mahoney commented if you use the 100 acre drainage as an alternative, for example, if I am a developer and come in with only five (5) lots, this would not apply with Mr. Caywood confirming. Mr. Henderson commented he thinks Supervisor Mahoney is missing something. It is the whole drainage area of the stream, not the area .of the development. Mr. Mahoney added he did not know if there were other alternatives such as rip wrap and plantings other than a buffer area that would accomplish the same goals. Mr. Moneir stated when staff started talking about this, we did not get into the taking issue. So some of the discussion we had with the development community is that any development that has already received approval, you cannot hold back. Secondly, if you put it in the zoning ordinance, it becomes a requirement and comes with the property versus when you have it in the erosion and sediment control, we have the flexibility to provide some remedies for specific conditions of lots. Mr. Mahoney then asked if the proposed ordinance include other alternatives other than a buffer. Mr. Moneir responded in the negative, but will work with the developer depending on the condition of the property. Supervisor North asked for a timeline from this day forward, going back to the folks that provided input, going over the changes that you proposed and then bringing it back to the Board. Mr. Moneir responded probably by the spring or early summer. We have to get this done before we make the next report to the State. Mr. Henderson advised the original TMDL action plan done back in 2015, we got a new permit that became active last year and one of those requirements was the new TMDL requirements for action plans that have to be rewritten and also have an opportunity for public comment and they have to be complete no later than the first part of May of this year. Mr. Moneir provided an overview of the flood plain ordinance, which Mr. Workman provided through a PowerPoint presentation. 12 January 14, 2020 Supervisor Mahoney commented that this is one of the initiatives we have to do if we want to provide flood insurance for our citizens. Yes, let's go full speed ahead. Second, please talk more about the recommended component about critical facilities and the 50 years flood plan. He commented he is worried there is so little land left in Roanoke County and if we need to put a fire station someplace, he is afraid of tying our hands without an alternative, i.e. raise it ten feet or some other failsafe mechanism to still be able to do it but have to build something extra or higher. Mr. Workman advised South County Library is an example and staff required it to be elevated a foot. So, theoretically is out of the 500 years flood plan. This kinds of things can be tweaked. There are options out there and usually it is a smaller strip of property. Another area that comes to mind is the Regional Jail. A small part is in the 500 years flood plan, but were able to get it high enough. Supervisor Mahoney stated the Board recently approved the church at Plastics One. He cannot remember if any part was in the 500 year plan. Mr. Philip Thompson, Director of Planning, indicated it was the 100 year plan on that particular property, but the thing is you can build in the 100 years flood plan with elevation. Supervisor Mahoney asked about the variance procedure built into the ordinance and asked who to go to with Mr. Workman responding the Board of Zoning Appeals Board. Supervisor Mahoney asked if we did what David is recommending, a 25 foot buffer, do I measure the buffer from the fringe or from the flood way. Mr. Henderson responded the edge of the water. In addition, most of the small streams do not have designated flood plans right now, but that is another reason to have a buffer because right now we do not have anything. Mr. O'Donnell asked if staff had identified how many acres or where this 500 foot issue would prevent critical facilities. Mr. Henderson advised it would not prevent, you would have to elevate above. Supervisor Radford stated with regard to Garst Mill, he is hearing the City is buying homes, why does the County not do that. Mr. Workman advise that would fall under the Community Rating System and our repetitive loss plan. We have purchased 25 homes since he has been here. We can continue that, but money needs to be allocated. It is a Federal, State and local program. Supervisor Radford then inquired if we had bought any properties in that area with Mr. Workman responding in the negative. Mr. O'Donnell stated we have not budgeted that for several year. We do not have an active program now. The work session was held from 3:34 p.m. until 4:45 p.m. The Board recessed for five minutes. January 14, 2020 13 2. Work session on Economic Development, Planning, Transportation, Explore Park and Greenways with the Board of Supervisors (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning; Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development; Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator and Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) County Administrator Daniel R. O'Donnell provided an overview and turned the meeting over to Jill Loope, who provided the Economic Development section of the PowerPoint presentation. Supervisor Mahoney inquired as to what VFP does with Ms. Loope advising they make the huts that protect telecommunication equipment. Supervisor North stated we need to keep the momentum going. Supervisor Mahoney asked if there were any numbers on occupancy with Cook or Byrd. Ms. Loope responded Cook was 100%, but does not know about Byrd. Supervisor Peters stated Byrd is a phased opening with 23 moving in the weekend after opening. Mr. Thompson then reviewed the Planning section of the PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Cronise reviewed the Transportation section and Mr. Blount reviewed the Explore Park and Greenways section of the powerpoint. Supervisor Radford inquired about kayaks and canoes. Mr. Blount advised staff has been talking with Blue Mountain Adventures, which is one of the services they can provide. Mr. O'Donnell provided the closing presentation. The work session was held from 4:50 p.m. until 6:09 p.m. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION At 6:49 p.m., Supervisor Radford moved to return to open session and adopt the certification resolution. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman Radford adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m. mitted by: Approved by: / ji.of pL • - •orah C. ip David F. Radford 1/1 Chief Depu erk to the Board Chairman 14 January 14, 2020 PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY