Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7/28/2020 - Regular
INVOCATION: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors July 28, 2020 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board." Page 1 of 5 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda July 28, 2020 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for July 28, 2020. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Because of the present state of emergency, and until further notice, members of the public are urged not to attend Board of Supervisor meetings in person. All are encouraged to view and participate in meetings through electronic means. Meetings may be viewed live on RVTV, Channel 3, or on the County's website https://roanokecountyva.gov (and accessed by clicking on the "Watch Board Meetings Online" button). Prior to and during meetings, citizens may share comments by email (to diacks(&roanokecountyva.gov) or by phone (540-776- 7278). When submitting comments, please include your name and address. Comments submitted by email and by phone will be read aloud during meetings, subject to reasonable time limitations. For those individuals who desire to attend meetings in person, please be advised that seating modifications and limits have been established in order to facilitate social distancing; attendees who are not of the same household must sit six feet apart; and attendance at meetings will be limited to 25 individuals. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Page 2 of 5 C. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 1. Resolution Supporting SMART SCALE applications by Roanoke County, the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization, the Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Commission and the City of Roanoke (Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to approve the minutes of the December 3, 2019, Board of Supervisors Meeting (Deborah Jacks, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board) E. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.- 1. ommission: 1. The petition of MCE Owner Occupied, LLP to obtain a special use permit in a C- 1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to allow a multi -family use to account for more than 50 percent of the gross floor area on the site on approximately 1. 116 acres, located at 3220 McVitty Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District 2. The petition of Om Shree Hospitality, LLC to rezone approximately 9.99 acres from AG -1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the construction of a hotel/motel/motor lodge, located near the 2700 block of Wildwood Road and the 1700 block of Skyview Road, Catawba Magisterial District F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance approving dissolution of a lease with Johnson & Elich Roasters, d/b/a Mill Mountain Coffee at South County Library, located at 6303 Merriman Road, Roanoke, Virginia, (Due to the Pandemic Disaster, it is requested, upon a four-fifths vote of the Board, the second reading be waived and the ordinance adopted as an emergency measure) Cave Spring Magisterial District (Rob Light, Director of General Services) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting and appropriating grant funds in the amount of $64,375 from the Washington/Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit (Howard B. Hall, Chief of Police) Page 3 of 5 H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Library Board (appointed by District) 2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism (appointed by District) 3. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — July 14, 2020 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $145,725 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim Witness Fund 3. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $574.75 from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) as reimbursement of County expenses for purchases of equipment to support virtual training 4. Confirmation of appointment to the Social Services Advisory Board (District) J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of June 30, 2020 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of June 30, 2020 5. Accounts Paid — June 30, 2020 L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to discuss amendments to the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority Articles of Incorporation (Daniel R. O'Donnell; Frank Smith, President and CEO of Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority) Page 4 of 5 EVENING SESSION — 7:00 P.M. M. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS N. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution congratulating the Glenvar High School Girls Swim Team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 2 Championship (Martha B. Hooker, Catawba Magisterial District Supervisor) O. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution approving the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Daniel R. O'Donnell, County Administrator; Frank Smith, President and CEO of Roanoke Valley Broadband) P. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 1. Resolution adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia: incorporating the draft (dated March 5, 2020) Hollins Center Plan (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Wild Partners to obtain a special use permit in a C -2S (high intensity commercial) District with special use permit to operate a car wash facility on approximately 1. 152 acres, located at 4065 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) R. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Paul M. Mahoney 2. Martha B. Hooker 3. Phil C. North 4. P. Jason Peters 5. David F. Radford T. ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: July 28, 2020 Resolution Supporting SMART SCALE applications by Roanoke County, the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization, the Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission and the City of Roanoke Megan Cronise Transportation Planning Administrator APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: SMART SCALE applications require a resolution of support from the governing body. Staff will review previous and proposed SMART SCALE applications with the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: The SMART SCALE program provides methods and procedures for scoring and funding transportation projects in the Commonwealth of Virginia. According to the SMART SCALE Technical Guide, "The purpose of SMART SCALE is to fund the right transportation projects through a prioritization process that evaluates each project's merits using key factors including: improvements to safety, congestion reduction, accessibility, land use economic development and the environment. The evaluation focuses on the degree to which a project addresses a problem or need relative to the requested funding for the project." The deadline for submitting SMART SCALE project applications is August 17, 2020. Attached is a PowerPoint presentation outlining projects proposed in Roanoke County, as well as several projects located on Route 460/Orange Avenue in the City of Roanoke. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: SMART SCALE applications require a resolution of support from the governing body. The proposed resolution of support includes not only projects to be submitted by Roanoke County, but also includes projects located in Roanoke County to be submitted by the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization and Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Commission. Additionally, because Route 460 in both the City of Roanoke and in Roanoke County is a critically important corridor, four projects located on Orange Avenue in the City are also included in the resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: The SMART SCALE program provides 100 percent funding for selected applications so no fiscal impact is anticipated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution of support for SMART SCALE applications to be submitted by Roanoke County, the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization, the Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission and the City of Roanoke. Page 2 of 2 El O O m O N O N 00 N D L4pi C) N .� Q _o U _o U U D D N O O ON D O U Q 3 ON D ,� Q c c N ::D ::D O U O Llr) U r O N O 0 0 0 } E E E E N } o c� o� o co cl� CO � o O w -- 0 o ° o > O O Uco O U N 0 O 4- N � Q C U o °' •V CL XLO O N O �o C C ' LU Q QC N } Q 00 - O • • D O �� C C� o �U L- CL �o �E���� >O coO oN N c 00Z J � cl:� 0:� U- O N o � � Q Q U •U •U _N _N Q 0 0 0 0 •O N N O u •+ O O �%O U U r O 0O O • o O o CD CD } CD � �_ CD - � O LQL w -- a� oo 7C) Q'a� o O Q (Y)� �7C) C) •� •U N 0 O w N N Q � N CL • LJ Q i, E O 0 0 O N m O V Q0070 OL �o c" O U N �� c� cz u o �D Q) Q) 0.9) 00 0 Q CD o N N N N 7C) .0 7C) .0 13 C 7C) C 7C) N N Q 'E Q w o w o Q U U N .E .E n n .� 0 o C 0 E.E E 0 LO M N i O � � u N •- ii OCL N U 0 .� M Co �°°' C�,� �U °o N �U 0o o 0 0 = �E� �o �°o N O O 0 U0 ry N O O R.' N s CL E 0 E O� r D LLI Q V) _0 �(D m Quo 0V) U� V) 0•E J � � 0}- - .0 E•E E co �D� U Q0"0 U } LO O c) V) LO o .� N } o bog -OV) � o O } � U r0 LJ O - - O c: cn c: C: N O 0 c: -0 O 0 E 0 '4 E Q N 0 `r' N N O N N p O O 0 �O� ,U O O U ,E O 0 U J O p 0 0- 0 = QcU c: > .������Q � Q0 0 V) 0 0� z�� �V °V'V) >C: .O U N 0 U 0 Nc:O .0 Q� > o H U N E O i E rel u O N N O D O W ilia J U p Q} o U o o�po0 CD �� �U�QL 2)"0 0 U 0 0 •� D c o��o Amo < LO o � co V) o} �o oco U U E� - > U O O O 3 w Q�"0 �U ) J _ _ .3C) _>1 UQ c UQ) � � �o o� � o O � U �m0 Q E p c) ap :�iO U U�� Ver, p 0� O SOU �� QL 2)"0 I -14,k X 000- z D Z� N � U O � •, O O C) ****o O � U o Rik- O U D O � N O � No No i � Q � m m O � � O � O � } O O co � %woo c 42 } U � •O OU � U O � (1) ry �O 0 0 . A� W E W 0 E s v 0 0 0 0 V (A i 04-0 4) CL N .x W co LO NO 4 +; 1` y3�:ss, t u• • ��y = �6 UJ�pIIWU�9 � N •N U •3 o 5 N Q U 7C) O O } � E O 3 •� U � 3 O U 4 � c O D 0 N Q E 0 N E O O W, 0 0 co D 0) 4-=) LU J O U� Q � N CL _(D H x (D D U) D Q Z • • • O JQ O O .c `e od O N AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SMART SCALE APPLICATIONS BY ROANOKE COUNTY, THE ROANOKE VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION, THE ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on July 28, 2020, the Board of Supervisors reviewed proposed SMART SCALE project applications; and WHEREAS, the list of projects includes applications to be submitted by Roanoke County, the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization, the Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Commission and the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to support both local and regional projects to mitigate congestion, promote economic development, increase accessibility, safety, and environmental quality, as well as develop projects consistent with local land use policies; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors particularly wants to support all proposed SMART SCALE projects located on congested Route 460 (Orange Avenue and Challenger Avenue), a Corridor of Statewide Significance that has been the subject of two studies in the past three years: the U.S. 460 Arterial Preservation Program (APP) and the Strategically Targeted Affordable Roadway Solutions (STARS) Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke County application: Page 1 of 3 a. Valleypointe Parkway Realignment b. Route 419 Streetscape Improvements, Phase 2 c. Starkey Road/Buck Mountain Road Intersection Improvements d. Route 460 at Alternate Route 220 Intersection Improvements 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE projects for Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization application: a. Route 460 at West Ruritan Road Intersection Improvements b. Route 460 Intersections from Carson Road to Huntridge Road c. Orange Avenue (Route 460) Improvements from 11th Street to Gus Nicks Boulevard 3. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE project for Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission application: a. 1-581 at Exit 2 Interchange Improvements 4. That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALE projects for City of Roanoke application: a. Orange Avenue (Route 460) at Blue Hills Drive b. Orange Avenue (Route 460) at King Street c. Orange Avenue (Route 460) at Seibel Drive/Hickory Woods 5. That the Clerk to the Board forthwith send a certified copy of this Resolution to Commonwealth Transportation Board member Dr. Ray Smoot, State Delegate Joseph McNamara, State Delegate Chris Head, Page 2 of 3 State Senator David Suetterlein, State Senator John Edwards and State Senator Steve Newman. 6. That this resolution is effective immediately. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Approval of minutes BACKGROUND: July 28, 2020 Request to approve the minutes of the December 3, 2019, Board of Supervisors Meeting Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Supervisor Mahoney has asked that the minutes prior to his time on the Board of Supervisors be approved as a separate item instead of on the Consent Agenda STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the December 3, 2019 minutes. Page 1 of 1 December 3, 2019 483 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December 2019. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES Before the meeting was called to order an invocation was given by Pastor Ethan Callison of Friendship Community Church, North Campus. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman North called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Phil C. North; Supervisors George G. Assaid, Martha B. Hooker, David F. Radford and P. Jason Peters MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Daniel R. O'Donnell, County Administrator; Richard Caywood, Assistant County Administrator; Rebecca Owens, Assistant County Administrator; Peter S. Lubeck, Acting County Attorney; Amy Whittaker, Public Information Officer and Deborah C. Jacks, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS County Administrator, Daniel R. O'Donnell requested the postponement of the Library recognition. There were no objections. Acting County Attorney, Peter Lubeck requested that agenda item E.1 - Resolution declaring Roanoke County a Second Amendment Sanctuary County be moved to item C.1. There were no objections. 484 December 3, 2019 IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution declaring Roanoke County a Second Amendment Sanctuary County (Peter Lubeck, Acting County Attorney) Mr. Lubeck explained the request for resolution. The following citizens spoke on this issue. Susan Edwards of 4121 Gives Road in the Glenvar area of Roanoke County stated "I want to thank you Chairman North and our Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for including this resolution on today's agenda, allowing for citizen comment and the diligence and careful consideration of wording of this resolution as presented. I'd also like to thank our County's Acting Attorney, Peter Lubeck for his background on where we are as a Dillon rule state, as well as the Constitution of Virginia and the Virginia Constitution. As of this morning, I believe there are 30 localities in the Commonwealth that, since the November election, have taken up a resolution, and I think there's about 50 more that are on deck to do likewise with agenda items specifically addressing standing up for what our Constitution and our Bill of Rights recognize. As we all know, we just celebrated the 400th anniversary of the landing in Virginia of colonists, and we recognize as Virginians that our state is the birthplace of this nation, being the home place of many of our founding fathers, notably Thomas Jefferson, George Mason who wrote the Virginia Bill of Rights, George Washington, and our very own Patrick Henry. Our nation was founded on the consent of free individuals recognizing our Creator's liberty that he put in us. We institute government at the consent of the governed. Our history lessons look to what the Constitution spells out, but the preamble tell us that it is, both at the federal level and at the state level, the consent of the government. All government is ultimately accountable to citizens, and I think that's why you have seen people stand up and say, wait a minute, we saw what was introduced earlier this year, and we see what's coming, and we want our rights protected. I'm going to jump ahead real quickly, watching the clock. I want to make a comment that protection of human life is very important to our community and to our nation. However, acting with good intentions without careful wisdom, looking at the unintended consequences of legislation and its application is at least foolish and at worst evil. We need to be careful when we impose on others, just because we have good intention and want to at least do something. I thank you all for your time and thank you very much." The Honorable Chris Head, State Delegate stated, "Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the Board. It's good to be here. It is my great honor to be able to represent about 50% of Roanoke County in my district, the 17th District, and to have been able to represent this area for the last 8 years. In that time, it has been December 3, 2019 485 regular practice that we have had bills come before us, and most of the time that I've served in the House of Delegates, I've served on the Committee of Militia, Police & Public Safety, and most of those bills that would erode the 2nd Amendment came frequently through my subcommittee, and we did everything we could to slow that train down or protect the rights that we are granted in our Constitution. I have taken it as a practice every two years when I'm sworn in, we raise our right we verbally affirm the oath of office and are sworn in. Then there's the document that we have to sign. I take a selfie not of my face but of my hand right after I've signed that oath, with a pen still in it, and my signature on the paper, and then I post that on my Facebook page. Because on there it says I do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. All of you took that same oath. And then faithfully discharging the duties of our office. The concern that I have is that if we as a general assembly now, because the tables have turned, and there are bills that have been filed now that I fear will pass, and my party doesn't have the power any longer to stop it. But I'm concerned that those bills will in fact be in conflict with that United States Constitution. It's fairly unambiguous in the Constitution when it says that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You'd be very hard pressed for that to be less unambiguous, and that is as clear as it gets. And I'm concerned when we pass legislation, if we pass legislation, that becomes Virginia law, that goes into conflict with that, how do we uphold the oath of office that we take, that we will support the Constitution of the United States if that comes into conflict with that laws, that we as a body, have passed? I think that the order of our allegiance has to come in the order that it appears on that oath, and that we have to take those steps. Now what you all can do by passing and adopting this resolution, while it may be seen as symbolic, it does send a very clear message to all of the legislators in Virginia, and I certainly hope that you will take that step and know that at least I'm not speaking for my colleague, but I think that you will find that your representatives here will do everything we can to protect the rights that were granted in our Constitution. Thank you for taking this up and for the opportunity to speak." The Honorable Joe McNamara, State Delegate stated, "Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, thank you very much for the opportunity to be here, thank you for having the courage to hold hearings and look at something you see as very, very bad, very wrong, and take action on it. I would like to say and make it very clear that I stand with you as a Board, I stand with the many, many citizens of Roanoke County in supporting our second amendment rights. Enforcing the laws that we have, laws that keep guns out of the hands of criminals, and punishing those who commit crimes with guns have proven time and again to be the key to reducing gun violence. As Delegate Head mentioned, we still don't know what the Democrats in Richmond will pass, what the governor will sign, but they have made it clear that they intend to infringe on the rights, our rights, in a very significant way. We heard Attorney Lubeck talk about the various laws and authorities and responsibilities, and being a Dillon Rule state, and I would like to reiterate what Delegate Head said, so it may look as though a resolution 486 December 3, 2019 such as this is symbolic on its face, it is extremely, extremely important that we make our feelings known and shared with the General Assembly message. It makes it no less important. Rather than engage in partisan politics, Delegate Head and members on our side of the aisle, we are committed to thoughtful and deliberate response based on facts and evidence, not political talking points. There have been nearly 30 counties that have taken action, and there's many, many more to come. It's sometimes lost in the conversation that Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the nation. In fact, we are fourth best as far as the lowest crime rate, beat only by New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine. You want to look at where the high crime rates are? It's where they've restricted Second Amendment rights: Maryland, Illinois, New York, DC. Our violent crime rate in Virginia is less than half of the national average. What we are doing is working. We want the Virginia that we have, and we want to keep it. Thank you very much for your time." Gary Flora, 4833 Brookwood Dr., SW Roanoke stated, "Blomberg poured huge amounts of money into Northern Virginia down through Tidewater. He did the same thing in Washington State and passed a law, 1594. The people in Washington state were voting on an actual ballot whether they wanted actual background checks in transfers or not. They voted for it, and the law went into effect, it was totally different than what they had advertised. The Washington sheriff said the law turned every gun owner into a criminal and refused to enforce it. If a grandfather wanted to teach his grandchild to shoot, the grandfather would have to run a background check on the child. The child would have to run another background check on the grandfather when he turned the gun back over to him. Every time any gun changed hands, this had to be done. We're talking that they might pass red flag laws here. There was a young school boy, I think down in Georgia, said something about a gun and school. The police showed up, went to the boy's house and confiscated his father's guns immediately. His father was a veteran and a retired police officer. All someone has to do is make an accusation, no proof, just somebody's word, and they remain anonymous. You must get a lawyer, go to court, hopefully win so you can get your property returned. Some states are even charging the owner for the storage of their firearms. They've already prefiled a bill here in the state of Virginia, and that's where I'm getting this information from. Rifles of any kind were used in only 2% of homicides. That includes assault rifles, semi- automatics, bolt rifles, everything. I think the bill they're trying to pass, SB16 prohibits any person from importing, selling, transferring, manufacturing, purchasing, possessing, or transporting an assault firearm. If you violate this you're a class 6 felon. And I had to look up what that was, one to five years in prison. Banned handgun capacity magazines. If you import, sell, bought, or transfer any firearm magazine that holds more than ten rounds, it's a class one misdemeanor, twelve months, $2500 fine. Banned silencers. Supposedly there are 1.3 million in the hands of private citizens. FBI says 44 might be used in a crime in a given year. The myth is that approximately 32,000 or more people are killed every year with guns. Fact says that 61% of these are suicides. Studies have shown that the presence or absence of a firearm does not change the December 3, 2019 487 overall suicide rate. Fifteen percent of the homicides are by law enforcement and are justified in them carrying out their duties. Well, I have just all kinds of information that's incorrect, but I would like to thank all of you all, and I'm proud to be living here in Roanoke County. I think everybody does a wonderful job. Thank you." Robert Cook, address is 4361 Fontaine Dr., Roanoke County stated, "I've been a resident of Roanoke County for 53 years now. Just a little background very quickly, my dad gave me my first little .22 rifle for my 6th birthday. Under the present political climate, he would probably be in jail for child endangerment now. I've shot in pretty much every competition that there is. I was a Roanoke County officer for 10 years, and I was a Roanoke County firearms instructor for 7 of those years. I am currently the president of the largest outdoor shooting facility in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and I say this just to say I know a little bit about guns. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment stands. End of story. That there shouldn't even be any more discussion about it. Under this thing that they're proposing now, Senate Bill 16, 1 own a few guns, nothing exotic, certainly nothing illegal. Not a single gun that I own would be legal if they pass it. They have actually done their homework, which is kind of unusual. Most of the time when they come up with stuff like this, the people who come up with it don't really know which end of the gun the bullet comes out of. But this time they have done their homework, and they have banned pretty much everything except blunder busses like the people on the Mayflower used when they landed here. They are talking about the import, manufacture, purchase, sale, trade, barter, and most importantly, possession of any of the items they are talking about banning. Nothing would be grandfathered. And then Senate Bill 64, which they've prefiled. Our gun club hosts every year at least ten high schools, one at a time. We bring several busloads of kids out for a day of marksmanship and safety training. Under Senate Bill 64, every one of our members who is an instructor there would be guilty of a felony. The men that wrote the Constitution were pretty smart guys. They had just come out from underneath the oppressive thumb of the greatest superpower of their time, and they knew what they were talking about. The Second Amendment protects us from an oppressive government. There's an old saying out there about not poking the sleeping bear. Well, poke the sleeping bear of the gun owners of Virginia, and there's a problem coming. Don't awaken the bear. Pass this resolution. And I thank you for your time." Roxane Christley of 7259 Willow Valley Road stated, "Thank you, Board, appreciate you giving us the chance to speak, making this meeting available to our citizens is what our government is about. I do find it troubling, however, that we had it at 3 o'clock in the afternoon where hard working people are not able to be here. But I do again thank you for making it possible. As stated, there has been a wave of counties who have accepted the adoption of a Second Amendment sanctuary for their counties, and I've worked with several Republican chairs throughout the Commonwealth to draft a resolution that I have sent to all of you. I did read the resolution that was put together by the County Attorney and just had a couple of additions or editing, things that I wanted to bring up. In the County Attorney's Whereas on page 2 of 3, he makes mention of the 488 December 3, 2019 elected officers that we have, local law enforcement, and notes that the sheriff and the Commonwealth's Attorney are independent, elected officers. They truly are the ones who we would speak to, they are the ones who take the oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States and Virginia, and so actually the Chief of Police should not be included in that at all. I also would ask that the resolution that I sent you, there are two points that are emphasized a little bit more that I think should be included, one being on the first page of my resolution where it says Whereas the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to express its intent to stand as a sanctuary county for Second Amendment rights and to oppose within the limits of the Constitution of the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia any efforts to unconstitutionally restrict such rights and to use such legal means at its disposal to protect the right of the citizens of Roanoke County to keep and bear arms, including through legal action the power of appropriation of public funds and the right to petition for redress the grievances and the direction of the law enforcement and the judiciary of Roanoke County to not enforce any unconstitutional law. As a gun owner myself, and a hunter who enjoys that, I find it extremely important that we protect, that I be able to protect my home, my property, and my family, and I encourage this Board to adopt this resolution with the recommendations and exclusions that I added. As well, I thank you all for your service to our county, and I hope that there will be an adoption of this resolution." Janet Scheid of 1453 Wolf Creek Drive stated, "I'm a resident of Roanoke County and also lucky enough to live in the town of Vinton. I am here to oppose this resolution to declare Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary county. In the resolution before you, it states that you are representing the sentiments of the Board and the community as a whole. I am here to clearly state that you are not representing my sentiments. The resolution is an embarrassing waste of time. I believe that Roanoke County and the Board of Supervisors have much more critical and important items to deal with than to discuss and pass a meaningless resolution that is not worth the paper that it's printed on. Does this county really intend to defy whatever state laws might be coming after democrats took control of the General Assembly in January? The resolution says Roanoke County supports the Constitution of the United States of America. That's great. I do too. Common sense gun laws have been upheld in courts across the country and all levels of government. Is anyone really arguing that mentally unstable people should have access to guns? In The District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 Supreme Court case, none other than Justice Scalia said the rights secured by the Second Amendment are not unlimited. People need to realize that not every common sense restriction is an infringement on Constitutional rights. There seems to be a great deal of anger in this room behind me, and that anger seems to grow out of fear. I don't really understand that. Are background checks and red flag laws that are supported by 90% of Virginians, citizens, really that scary? Requiring universal background checks and extreme risk protection orders will do absolutely nothing to infringe on the rights of law abiding, responsible, gun owning citizens of this county. I support their right to own a gun to protect themselves and their homes and to hunt if they so choose. The courts December 3, 2019 489 have routinely held that the right to bear arms is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. The state not only has the right, they have the duty to limit this. It is not a coincidence that all of these rural counties across the state of Virginia are being lobbied to pass this meaningless type of resolution at this point in time. Does Roanoke County really want to jump on this bandwagon? We should be focusing on economic development and tourism, bringing people in from across the state and across the country to do business here and to recreate here. Is this really the image we want to project? We are better than this. And sometimes when we are elected to govern, it's important, and sometimes even necessary, to swim upstream. Thank you for your time." Larry Carver of 4044 Blandfield Drive in Vinton, which is Roanoke County stated, "I'm also a retired law enforcement officer. During my career, I've taken the oath of office for three departments. One local department, which is Roanoke County Sheriff's Office, a state department, and also a federal agency. I'm here today to speak on what I feel is the most important issues facing all of the citizens of Virginia, not just Roanoke County. And this is our precious freedoms that are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and also by the Bill of Rights. Our Virginia government officials are attempting to take away our rights to protect ourselves and our loved ones by taking away our guns. We must fight back. During the years with law enforcement agents, I was issued and carried a semi-automatic pistol. Every one of those guns carried magazines that held more than ten rounds of ammunition. Most law enforcement agents today, Roanoke County police, they all carry handguns that can hold more than ten rounds. It's a standard. So now in 45 years after I became a police officer the first time, all the firearms that I've required to carry as a law enforcement officer to protect myself, my family, citizens of Roanoke County, the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the citizens of the United States of America, now if I carry that gun, I'm going to be a felon. So I've been a police officer all these years, and you're going to make me a felon by having these anti -gun laws. Anti -gun laws do not affect criminals. They only affect good, law abiding citizens. Today we discussed the ground rights of citizens, given to us through the Second Amendment, which I'm not going to repeat, because everybody knows, but the last part of that, shall not be infringed. What part of that don't the politicians realize or don't they understand? We must fight back. They only make criminals out of normal citizens, these gun laws do. Just use the following examples. Would anyone here want to live in Chicago, or DC, or New York City? Strictest gun control laws in the nation and the highest gun control deaths in the nation. Do we want Virginia cities to be like New York and DC? Richmond is bad enough without gun control. It's not a law for citizens, it's a law for the politicians, gun control is. Gun laws only affect and hurt law abiding citizens. Criminals love strict gun laws because all they do is make the citizens into sheep waiting to be slaughtered when we have no protection. Like I said, we must fight back. How do we fight anti -gun politicians? Let all politicians know that we will vote out of office any and all politicians that vote for any type of laws or regulations that violate or change our Constitution or our Second 490 December 3, 2019 Amendment. Our Constitution is strong. It does not permit politicians to be dictators and kings. Politicians are the representatives of us because we are the people and should be working for the people, not for their own interests, which they are. We must fight back. I'm asking you, please declare Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary and make a statement to all Virginia and all U.S. citizens that we will support them. Thank you for your time and support, and God bless our great country." Betty Burke of 6620 Shingle Ridge Road stated, "I've lived there for more than 30 years. When I read that Roanoke County Board of Supervisors would be discussing the adoption of becoming a Second Amendment sanctuary, I immediately wondered exactly what that meant. My understanding is that a Second Amendment sanctuary designation does not exempt a locality from existing or new gun control laws, so I started doing a little internet research which confirmed my understanding. I live in a semi -rural area of Roanoke County where two nearby neighbors periodically target shoot. So I decided to ask one of these community neighbors what this designation would mean and what impact it might have. Now let me preface this neighbor's remark with some background about him. We've been, again, neighbors for more than 30 years. He describes himself as a long time target shooter, hunter, and sportsman. His immediate response to my question was, it's a feel good deal to do nothing, and it's a way for politicians to try to appease their constituents. So my question to the Board is, why is this on the agenda? Doesn't Roanoke County have more critical work to address genuine county needs? How does this designation attract younger people to some of our aging neighborhoods? How does this designation help with solving the traffic problems on major routes? How does this help with reimagining the Tanglewood corridor? I would like to see this Board make good on the changes that attract more citizens and improve the quality of life for all of its citizens rather than adopt a feel good classification that signifies nothing. Thank you for listening to my comments, and I'm glad this is not a popularity contest, since I'm not winning. Thank you." Dan Webb of 4801 Sunnyside Dr. in Cave Spring stated, "I'm a Roanoke County resident and an aide to Roanoke County State Senator David Suetterlein. Senator Suetterlein has legislative commitments in Richmond today and tomorrow and wanted to speak, but he could not attend so he sent me on his behalf. And he wanted to thank the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for considering this step affirming the Second Amendment. And the best way of stopping laws that threaten citizens' rights is by defeating them in the General Assembly in the first place. Senator Suetterlein is working to do that with our colleagues Delegate Joe McNamara, Delegate Head. Senator Suetterlein is working to do that and appreciates all of the engaged citizens that have come out today and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for sharing that goal. Personally as a Roanoke County citizen and as a young person just mentioned, one of the reasons that I moved to Roanoke County is because of the freedoms and ability to not feel judged for my conservatism. Incoming Democratic senate majority leader Dick Saslaw has already introduced a number of bills that are severely concerning to law abiding gun owners, including the ten round magazine ban December 3, 2019 491 that has been mentioned. That same law in California was just recently struck down by a federal judge because it does not comply with the Heller decision in allowing adequate home defense. Another law is in the process of going through the Supreme Court in New York which has the possibility of expanding our freedoms. So not only is the General Assembly going against our Constitutional rights, they are going against recent court precedence by bypassing these gun control laws. The common saying is, preservation of liberty requires eternal vigilance. This resolution is good, and I hope the Board passes it, but it is not enough. This crowd here today is outstanding, but it is not enough. Simply voting for folks who will protect our freedoms is not enough. It is our duty in a government by the people and for the people to take personal responsibility in who writes our laws, and that means organizing to elect individuals who will protect our Constitutional freedoms. Hundreds of people coming here today to support our Second Amendment is amazing. But hundreds of people getting organized, knocking on doors and persuading voters of our ideals is the most effective way for us to preserve our liberties. And I hope that everyone will not just post on Facebook about their feelings but get involved with the Roanoke County Republican Committee, join the Committee, help us elect our Republican members of the senate and the house of delegates and our local supervisors and also show up on January 20 for lobby day in Richmond to have a physical presence there to show our representatives across the state how you feel about their decisions of infringing on our Constitutional rights. Thank you. Lee Anthony of 3779 Carvins Cove Road out in the Bennett Springs area stated, "I was born and raised in the Roanoke area, the Roanoke valley. I've been around for a long time. I would like now to speak in opposition to any further attacks on my Second Amendment rights and particularly those which may be introduced by the General Assembly in the near future. My extended family has fought for liberty and freedom as far back as the French and Indian Wars. My concern right now is twofold. First, there are recent reports of convicted felons being released early by liberal judicial systems. Second, the Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens are threatened by the politicians who meet in Richmond led by a person who has no problem with the murder of babies before or after their birth. I have put together a significant collection of military over the past 45 years, and this collection has been the basis for many of my lectures and museum displays which pass on to the present generation and future generations the importance of our nation's history as well as the sacrifices which have been made by those people, those patriots who have served this state and this nation. Is it going to be necessary for law abiding Virginia citizens to either move out of the state or to relinquish their legally held artifact collections? We know that Botetourt has just passed a resolution to become a Second Amendment sanctuary county. I would urge that Roanoke County also follow suit. Thank you very much for this opportunity to speak." Ron Carlisle of 3464 Colonial Avenue in Roanoke stated, "I'd like to thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Board, for the opportunity to provide input to you today. Why become a Second Amendment sanctuary? Most of the proposed gun 492 December 3, 2019 laws or restrictions are simply an attempt by a few to impose their will and beliefs on the majority who are good, law abiding citizens. As with many laws and restrictions being implemented today, they are an easy simplistic attempt to make the American public think they are safer when in reality, they do not address the core problems which results in the horrific incidents about which we are all aware. Restricting the Second Amendment rights of law abiding, legal gun owners will not have an impact on gun violence. Such restrictions and law will only serve as false, real feel good measures which punish the law abiding, legal gun owners and inappropriately and illegally restrict and deny them their Constitutional rights. Based on Mr. Lubeck's presentation, it seems to me that it would require Constitutional amendments to both the United States and the Virginia Constitutions for any such laws to be passed because there is no doubt they infringe on the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms. We are fast becoming a society in which societal problems are being addressed with sweeping, broad -reaching, quick and easy fixes, quote unquote, which inappropriately restrict and or remove the rights and freedoms of all citizens because of the actions or beliefs of small groups or individuals. This has become routine in schools, at public events, and numerous other venues. The attempts to restrict and or remove the Constitutional rights of law abiding, legal gun owners is just another example of this trend and an effort to erode the rights and freedoms of Americans. The implementation of Second Amendment sanctuary status in Roanoke County will help to prevent this erosion. You as county officials have the responsibility to ensure that the Constitutional rights of Roanoke County citizens are not infringed upon or removed. Please do not shirk or abdicate that responsibility. Implement the measures necessary to make Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary as soon as possible. It is imperative that Roanoke County declare itself a Second Amendment sanctuary and stand in solidarity with the other jurisdictions of southwest Virginia which have done so in order to send a clear and unequivocal message to the politicians in Richmond threatening to codify a misguided and erroneous political ideology. The right to keep and bear arms is not just a United States and Virginia Constitutional right to the citizens of southwest Virginia but rather has been a way of life for centuries and continues to be today. The repercussions of denying those rights will be, not maybe or could be, severe, immediate and unavoidable. Thank YOU." Mary Scanlon of 2970 Brughs Mill Road, Fincastle, Virginia stated, "Thank you, Chair and Supervisors, for listening and allowing me to speak today. I want to emphasize that the safe handling and securing of firearms by women is both a deterrent and an equalizer when a woman is by herself. I am a descendant of a Rockbridge County, Virginia delegate to Richmond, and on June 26, 1788 he voted for Virginia to ratify the United States Constitution. In fact it was only passed by ten votes. Why? Patrick Henry and his impassioned speech on the rights that were not included in our document. There was a second vote here in Virginia which included those rights. Virginia really is the home place of the Bill of Rights, so it is personal. My last point is rather tragic but deals with the recent gun control frenzy. I've read the book Why December 3, 2019 493 Meadow Died written by a grieving father, Andrew Pollack. He pursued on past this tragedy to try and find answers to why did this happen and how can we stop it from happening again. His co-author, Max Eden, is an educational expert, and he described a new educational reform movement that is called "social justice industrial complex." suggest to our media to try and investigate this. There's a quote from the epilogue at the end by Andrew Pollock, "Short of banning guns altogether, nothing in the gun control agenda would have prevented 18-1958 from getting a gun because he looked totally clean on paper. But rather than try to figure out why a student who everyone was saying had committed plenty of crimes had nothing on its record, the media treated the question as a threat to their agenda and marginalized it as a right wing thing." Later Andrew Pollack states, "I hope that this book has shown you there are so many school safety problems that have nothing to do with guns." As a retired educator, I'm looking at this as nothing is simple about this recent tragedy as depicted in the media. I'm suggesting that Virginia citizens and our Virginia lawmakers need to think on their own, pursue the facts, and not draw conclusions quickly. Thank you Roanoke County for suggesting the sanctuary county for the Second Amendment, because it is personal. Thank you." Allen Scanlon of 2970 Brughs Mill Road in Fincastle stated, "I thank you for the opportunity to assemble and express my views today. One may reasonably wonder if the day will come when those rights will also be in danger. I'm here as a Virginian and in support of all Virginians who value the law and our Constitution. I'm fortunate to live in a county where our Board of Supervisors recognizes the U.S. and Virginia Constitutions and pledge to stand by them as the rule of our county. And I am equally happy to no longer live in Roanoke City where the citizens' voice is repeatedly ignored. We are here today because of the effect and consequences of one person who is not a Virginian. One person contributed 3.5 million dollars to influence the last election for our state legislature that averaged $184,000 per seat gained in the Virginia legislature, and gun control was the focus of his efforts. I have addressed many councils and many supervisor meetings over the years in various jurisdictions and in even other states. Sometimes the following decisions were favorable and sometimes they were not. And I've always wondered whether what I had to say or what anybody had to say had any influence on the people that we were speaking to. I really don't know the answer to that. I sent all of you a message Sunday, and it contained the logic of what I feel was a rational position supporting a Second Amendment sanctuary resolution I feel it made many important points based in history blended with the logic of a reasonable person. In hopes that you actually did read my message, I'll forego repeating it, but I'll take the Bloomberg approach today. Politicians hold their position because they seek to be elected and it is clear that the thing that impacts most politicians isn't logic or the law necessarily but what will impact their reelection. I hope the law and logic impact your decision today, and I am confident that it will. My message here is that I pledge to work for the defeat of any candidate for any position, in any jurisdiction who refuses to recognize the U.S. and the Virginia Constitution as the supreme law of the land. 494 December 3, 2019 Concurrently, I pledge to support all candidates in all jurisdictions and in all elections for those that do recognize it. Numerous articles and various publications proclaim this Second Amendment sanctuary matter as a fairy tale or fantasy. We are not living in a fantasy world, thinking this resolution is the end. It is well understood that it is just the beginning. I submit that wealthy high profile people like Mr. Bloomberg are the ones who live in a make believe world. This body has not made and cannot make any law restricting the right to keep and bear arms. I understand that as do my fellow Virginians. I urge you to approve this resolution and let us continue to fight to achieve a resounding defeat of any unconstitutional measures. Yes, it is symbolic and so was the Boston Tea Party." Randolph Jefferson English of 5154 Brittany Road in Roanoke County stated, "The good attorney has explained that you all took an oath of office, lady and gentlemen. I took an oath also. In 1972, on the occasion of enlisting in the United States Coast Guard. Something that has stuck with me since that day is, I was told that it was my responsibility to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America from all threats, foreign or domestic. What is on the docket in Richmond, I feel is a domestic threat. I was released from active duty, but I was not released from my oath. Eight generations ago, the English family was established in Virginia by William English when he stepped off of a boat in Jamestown. Along the way, our family allied with a family named Jefferson. You may have heard of my cousin six times removed. His name was Thomas. In one of his writings, he spoke of the tree of liberty. Some of you may view those words as a cautionary tale. If you decide to stand with patriots, you are welcome to come stand beside me. If you decide to bow down to tyrants, you will be remembered. A line in the sand is just the beginning. The Second Amendment protects all of the others. Give up this one, and kiss the rest of them goodbye. Thank you for your time. Rita Marian of 6375 Boulder Trail Drive, #2085 in Roanoke County stated, "I'm hoping I can make the three minutes, I've timed myself, and I've gone over thirty minutes, so we'll see. Let's consider the future of Roanoke County here. Do we have enough jobs? Enough major employers to ensure steady, reliable, good paying jobs for all? Are residents a tax base that allows for sustainable, local growth, improvement in our schools, in our county services, improvement in the county infrastructure? Take a good hard look around the county. If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are fooling yourselves. Again, consider the future of Roanoke County. What image of our county do we want, no, need to project to the rest of Virginia and the country? What attracts potential employers looking for a place to expand their companies, provide a comfortable, safe, law abiding lifestyle for their employees? Consider the future of Roanoke County. A Second Amendment sanctuary county? What message would that send about Roanoke County? That we only believe in the Second Amendment and nothing else? What about the rest of the Constitution? If anything, we should pass a resolution that makes Roanoke County a Constitutional sanctuary county. That way, the message we send is, we protect all rights under the Constitution and the legitimate rule December 3, 2019 495 of law. Let's explore a bit further what a Second Amendment sanctuary is really intended to communicate. It says, as a county, we will fail to enforce certain legislation we arbitrarily don't agree with and instruct our local law enforcement agencies to look the other way. Hey everybody, you want to break the law? Come on down to Roanoke County. We don't mind. I'll interject here a thought to the Board of Supervisors. Nonpartisan, independent, national polling indicates that 80% of Americans, including gun owners and NRA members, favor common sense gun legislation and not the NRA lobby propaganda. The very people we need to attract to grow Roanoke County are the ones who will not look favorably on such a resolution and by association, Roanoke County. My message this evening is quite simple and clear. To turn the answers to the questions in my opening comments to yes, we must attract sustainable, permanent business to the county. That business will provide jobs, attract more residents to the area, increase the tax base, and fuel healthy growth in the county. To do that, we must have a local government and law enforcement that responsibly follows the law and actively promotes the public safety. Without, the county will continue to flounder, and depending on your actions, may indeed spiral further downhill. For the last time, I ask you to consider the future of Roanoke County. Please vote against the Second Amendment resolution and send a positive message about Roanoke County. One quick thing, there is a gentleman in the back who is for this gun sanctuary resolution, and they asked him why did you sit in the back. And he said, because I'm afraid of gunfire. And he was being truthful, not being funny. So they even are afraid of this, and he said it, and I heard it, so they can laugh all they want." Steven Richards of 6384 Spring Run Drive stated, "Members of the Board of Supervisors, yesterday, this same event took place in Roanoke City. However, the Board, or the Council of Roanoke City administration would not listen. I would pray that you would listen, because there are many here that have much to say, as you have realized. Why should you entertain passing this resolution? Simply stated, it's to send this message to Richmond and to Washington that Roanoke County stands with the Constitutions as we have been talking about. Those who advocate gun control believe that such laws will reduce gun violence and better protect the citizenry, as we may have heard today. However, there is no evidence that doing so will do any more than gun free zones have protected us from mass shootings. In the face of obvious lack of effectiveness as we have seen in violent communities around the United States, Chicago, for example, many have come to realize that this is all a subterfuge for a larger agenda, the gutting and downsizing of the Second Amendment into an empty memory of a former freedom. Why would they want this for America? We know that gun regulations do not perform, but they still want to strip away this larger right by administering death by a thousand cuts, so to speak. It can be for only one reason, and that is to exert government control over a free people. We here today call upon the Roanoke County Board to pass this resolution and send this clarion shout all the way to the General Assembly that this Constitution will be protected and none of it will be disassembled as plotted by those who resent our freedoms and guaranteed by our 496 December 3, 2019 founding fathers and purchased by the blood spilled on many battlefields over the many years. Members of the Board, please dare to stand with all of us against this wave of tyranny that has begun. Bob Crawford, long time Roanoke resident residing at 6620 Shingle Ridge Road in the County stated, "I wrote these brief remarks assuming that your resolution be essentially the same as the one that has been adopted in a few dozen other localities. Now I see that your erstwhile attorney Lubeck has apparently taken out all or possibly most of the illegal aspects of the resolution, which leave it moot. I will still go ahead and read my comments because you are associating yourself with that resolution as it exists in most of those cases if you pass it. We see that in regard to gun safety regulations, some members of the community feel their Constitutional rights are abridged or fear that unconstitutional regulations might be passed in the future. However, because the suggested so-called sanctuary approach calls for legal officials to violate their Constitutional oaths by illegally refusing to carry out their duties, the sanctuary approach clearly fails as a solution for protecting constitutional rights. In other words, the sanctuary approach is in violation of its own stated purpose. I urge you to spare Roanoke County's reputation as a friendly place where culture and commerce thrive in an appealing natural environment. Don't give us a black eye by declaring our county a Second Amendment sanctuary area. Thank you." Julia Crump of 8533 Martins Creek Road in Roanoke County stated, "Lady and gentlemen, thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today on issues very important to me and many other county residents. I would like to thank you for your work helping to make Roanoke County such a wonderful place to live. I'm a firearms instructor, competition safety officer, and hold an armed security license. I've been a Virginian for 72 years and a resident of Roanoke County for 52 years. I share the values of many residents, the right to protect myself and loved ones with legally purchased firearms, hence the Second Amendment. We wish Roanoke County to join many Virginia localities in passing a Second Amendment sanctuary resolution and sending a message to Richmond that we do not agree with their proposed law changes that would make law abiding citizens who wish to keep their firearms into felons. The criminals will never give up their weapons and will continue to attack those who cannot defend themselves. We already have lost to prosecute criminals and some adjustments are necessary in law enforcement agency communication as well as in the mental health realm. This is not a gun control issue but a people control issue. It's become a political issue. Thank you. Please vote to make Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary. David Howutson of 4518 Twelve O'Clock Knob Road, stated "As you can hear, I'm not from around here originally. But having seen these sorts of laws work in Australia, they don't. I used to work at a rifle range outside of Sidney. There would be days where we would have three or four shooters. And I would hear more gunshots from my suburban home in Sidney. As for the way the red flag laws work, yeah, they look great on paper until you realize that someone you annoyed or someone who've December 3, 2019 497 had a relationship with doesn't like you anymore, phones in an anonymous report, and all of a sudden, you've got nine guys banging on your door at 3 a.m. wanting to know where all your guns are. People do not realize how quickly, when politicians get a bug in them and decide they are going to do something, it happens, and it goes downhill very, very fast. And unfortunately any real reply to them goes uphill very, very slow. I urge you to say yes, we are a Second Amendment sanctuary. And as every revolution has been an illegal, unlawful act against someone who is repressing the people rebelling, all of this is saying, we've had enough. No more. If it starts, it starts here, this is the line. Bring it on. That's it. Thank you." Jonathan Mays of 3432 Green Ridge Court stated, "I'm represented by the Hollins District. Thank you Mr. Chairman and fellow board members. I didn't prepare anything, I just hoped I wasn't called first so I could respond to some of the criticisms I heard and what stood out a lot to me, I heard a woman say that there was a lot of fear in the crowd behind her, and I'll speak for myself, but I feel like many people would agree with me. I'm not afraid of a big government man coming to my door to take my guns, because frankly I don't trust the government to execute anything properly. I'm not afraid if Roanoke County is the only county in Virginia that passes a Second Amendment sanctuary law. What I am afraid of the blue flag behind you says sic semper tyrannis, death to tyranny, and I'm afraid that we as Virginians, and more broadly, we as Americans, are starting to fail to recognize what tyranny looks like. We think of tyranny as a fat man with a crown in Europe inflicting laws on a non -consenting people or a middle Eastern oil tycoon gassing his own people in the middle of the night. But tyranny doesn't happen with an armed population. The first step of any tyrant has to be to disarm the general population. So I hope that we as Americans and Virginians recognize tyranny, because if we don't, we'll be stomped under it and we will deserve to be stomped under it. The second thing that I noticed was a woman pointed out that passing a Second Amendment sanctuary law might deter other people and businesses from entering Roanoke County. I've been active duty Navy for just shy of five years now, and I've done a lot of traveling, and every time I come home, it's a different landscape. I'm driving down the road, oh, when did that get there, when did this get there. There's new construction. So I don't see how not, we're currently enforcing Second Amendment laws, and you have the right to 30 round magazines, assault rifles, so how I don't see how continuing to support those would deter any future people from coming to Roanoke County. And if it would, I'd like to talk to someone about how that might happen. Thank you for your time." David Courey of 3419 Ashneade Drive SW stated, "Thank you for affording me the opportunity to speak. Considering the amount of discussion on the subject, it is difficult not to be redundant. However, the subject does bear repetition. We are sickened by the proposals of our socialist government in Richmond wanting to oppose unconstitutional laws infringing upon the rights of citizens to own firearms. It is a fact that the criminals that wish to do harm are not even fazed by gun laws. Criminals buy guns by illegal means. They obtain them through underground and out of reach of 498 December 3, 2019 any government control. It is a sad fact that no gun control law can eliminate this. It is the law abiding citizen that is harmed by these gun control laws by not being allowed the means to self-protection. Let us understand that the Constitution does not say the government will decree the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. The Constitution says that the government shall not infringe upon the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not a right that the government has granted to us. It is an unalienable right that the government is forbidden to take away from us. If our legislature in Richmond is to make arms illegal for citizens to own, the police would be so busy arresting honest citizens, they would have no time to keep criminals from their nefarious deeds. In the words of Charles Dickens, let me offer you a tale of two cities: Houston and Chicago. Houston has very minimal guns laws and a low crime rate. Chicago has strict gun laws and is rife with crime and very high murder rate. Both cities are the same population and demographics. Clearly gun control laws cause crime. Let the word go forth to friend and foe alike that the sleeping giant has been awakened. This is our country and we mean to take it back. We will no longer tolerate attacks upon the United States Constitution and particularly the Second Amendment or the Bill of Rights. I urge you to have the intestinal fortitude to support the people that you serve and not side with the nefarious governor and newly elected legislature in Richmond. You are here, not in Richmond, and you should support the people you represent, not the evil governor that intends to infringe upon our rights granted by the Constitution. Thank you for allowing me to voice my opinion." Max Beyer of 2402 Coachman Drive in Roanoke, Virginia, stated, "Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the Board. I would like to commend the Board for its actions to favorably consider supporting the United States Second Amendment of the Constitution. In a way it's sad to find this action necessary. That patriotism and pride, the very basis of our republic is so lacking. But as President Reagan pointed out, our liberty is just one generation from being destroyed. And it's necessary for each generation to recognize the frailty of our institutions and our obligations to reaffirm its foundation. Our defense and reaffirmation rightly begins in our home and local community. And it is refreshing and entirely appropriate that such recognition has been initiated by this body, our local county government. It should be comforting to you that by this action, you are expressing the views of most of its citizens and that you have been elected to represent. In turn, it is comforting to us, your electors, that we have selected you as representatives who had the personal patriotism and political courage to speak out at a time of national dissention and misguided activism. Be assured in your defense of the Constitution that we are united. There's little space between you and those you represent. Unfortunately, there is a significant difference between most local citizens and our local written press, a business owned and operated, controlled by people who are located physically, morally, and philosophically outside this region. As we citizens have long known, that paper, The Roanoke Times, does not represent us in any meaningful way. And it is anathema to this region and its beliefs and culture. December 3, 2019 499 Accordingly, I would encourage you, Board members, to disregard their opinions on this and any other matter. Thank you for your time. Reverend Dusty Kenyon Fiedler stated, "I am a retired Presbyterian minister. I live at 5313 Cromwell Court. The last time I was here, I came to pray for your meeting just like Reverend Callison did earlier. As a preacher, I know that brevity is of the best, so I am here to be quick. I'm here today not to try to change any minds. I know that I am in the distinct minority, but I am here to let you, the Board of Supervisors, know that there are many of us, believe it or not, in Roanoke County, who would hope that you would not move to make Roanoke County a sanctuary county because, because we have been listening to our children and to our grandchildren who have begged us to keep them safe. We hope that today you will turn down this request just like your colleagues in Roanoke City did yesterday because we do not believe that guns are the answer to our safety and to our peace. The word sanctuary was originally a religious term. Sanctuary meant a sacred place, a haven, a place of safety, free of violence. And that is what we want for everyone, those of us who hope you will act not to accept this movement. Thank you so much." Gail Burruss of 703 North Battery Drive, Hollins district, stated, "I am a native and proud Virginian, a Roanoke County resident who enjoys the gifts of wild game from my hunting friends, someone who knows how to shoot, and I do it responsibly and well. And I'm here today to ask you not to approve a resolution that would declare Roanoke County, meaninglessly, I would say, a Second Amendment sanctuary. There is no legislation that has been prefiled in the General Assembly that is inconsistent with what courts throughout the nation have ruled is Constitutional. They are consistent with the Supreme Court's 2008 Heller decision, which says, and I quote, like most rights, the rights secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. What has been prefiled is bills that would make it less likely that guns would be available to those who are more likely to present a threat to public safety, people who have been convicted of a felony, perpetrators of domestic violence, and people who are at risk of self -harm by gun violence due to a serious mental illness. It's pertinent that 51% of people who commit suicide do so with the use of a firearm. That's from the Federal Department of Justice. Virginia currently has some of the most lax gun laws in the country. We are known as a gun running state with countless guns bought in our state and sold on the streets in other states. We need to limit the number of handguns that a person can buy each month. How can that, or universal background checks, adversely affect a well -regulated militia? This resolution, if approved, would undermine the rule of law. You would actually tell your law enforcement professionals to ignore laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia that may or may not be passed in the 2020 Virginia General Assembly session? Those advocating for this resolution are seeking sanctuary from the law. What would be next? If somebody doesn't like county speed limits, would there be an effort for Roanoke County to become a speed limit sanctuary? While merely symbolic, because of Virginia's Dillon rule, this resolution would undermine the rule of 500 December 3, 2019 law, and I ask you not to embarrass the citizens of our county by approving a resolution that is about histrionics and hysteria. Katherine Cable stated, "I am actually a resident of the city, but some of your county residents felt to come yesterday to my Roanoke City meeting, so I'm returning the favor, and I'll keep it very brief because I'm a city resident. I just want to let you know that I intend to encourage businesses to locate in a safe locale, where gun laws will be respected and enforced, where, if you have a, sorry the echo is a little distracting ... so my point is I intend to encourage businesses, and I'm sure Roanoke City intends to encourage businesses, to locate to the city instead of the county, that we intend to recruit residents and young families on the basis of, you know, you will not be going to school with other school children who will have easy access to firearms to bring to school or to commit violence against your children. In Roanoke County, you've had multiple, you've had multiple, you've had multiple, middle schoolers die by gun suicide, and I know you're aware of this. Gun access amongst our children is a serious problem. And Roanoke City intends to address this serious problem by taking up and following new gun laws on child access prevention and working to prevent children from having access to firearms. These are the kinds of safety and common sense provisions that are being put forth. And I truly believe that Roanoke City has a growing populace. We have a younger, more vibrant city than we ever have for quite some time. Roanoke County is losing residents. You're aging faster than the city. Ask yourself, is this the kind of resolution that will bring young people to your city, or to your county? The very age of this room should tell you something. Thank you. Bill Brown of 3767 Harborwood Road stated, "I appreciate the opportunity to speak. I just got a couple of things that kind of come up with listening to the comments. A lot of people have said that this is a symbolic gesture, which it's really not. What it is that our tax dollars are not going to be used to tear down the Second Amendment, so it's not symbolic at all, it means something, and it's important that our tax dollars are not used for that. And some of the things that they're proposing are just, mean, I don't know who thought these things up, about especially I heard the one gentleman talk about how that if he can't train anybody anymore because it will be a class 6 felony. And, I mean, to get better gun control, you need better knowledge, you need better training. If anything they should pass laws that require better training. They should pass laws that kids in schools are trained with guns. They have driver's ed in school, why not have gun education in schools? So there's a lot of things that people are not looking at that they should look at. One of the other ladies said that she heard that somebody was, somebody had fear. But the only real fear I have is that the working class is not going to be heard anymore. Thank you for your time." Vanetta McAlexander of 1845 Bridle Lane stated, "I shot guns at such a young age, that much to the delight of my brothers, I didn't know the difference between a shotgun and a rifle, nor the resulting kick between the two. I like skeet shooting, I've shot an AR -16 and an M-14. I have taught in school and certified several thousand young folks in hunter safety classes. I am familiar with guns, and I am not against gun December 3, 2019 501 ownership. But just as I'm not a proponent of unregulated access to many things, and I'll just use vehicles as an example, I'm not a proponent of unregulated access to guns. We have people in this room saying they don't want laws passed in Richmond to be followed, but I'll bet I could ask them if they could tell me what those laws are, and I'll bet if we went through with them one by one, they would agree that that law's not bad. Now in the interest of time, let me just do a couple of them. Allowing extreme risk protection orders. So if someone threatens to kill themselves or their wife or children, their guns can be temporarily taken. Making it illegal to recklessly leave loaded firearms around children. Now that's a law that you just couldn't get behind, right? Letting localities regulate whether guns are allowed in government buildings. So this group here, with all the hostility evidenced in this room and the one upstairs, could say that no guns are allowed in that room. Many of us use an illogical argument that if any laws are made, it might lead to our guns being taken away so we can't support any laws. If we did that for other aspects of our life, again, using cars as an example, we're saying that someone continually convicted of drunk driving can't have their license removed because it might lead to all of us losing our licenses. That argument has the same merit as the one we're using with guns. No merit. I'm embarrassed that supervisors and constituents where I live would even agree to consider a resolution encouraging our elected officials to break the law by not enforcing the laws. We're allowing the very organization, the NRA, that began to, the reason it began was to teach marksmanship to the militia, and that more recently sponsored my gun safety classes, and that now only exists to appease the gun manufacturing lobby, we're allowing that organization to use scare tactics to lead us as though it is the pied piper and we are its unthinking followers to bring up resolutions such as this. But we elected you to represent all of us and to be smarter than this. If these folks want to be the rats and unsuspecting children that followed the pied piper, I ask that you not be the sheep bullied by them into passing this ridiculous resolution. Thank you." Connie McKay of 4400 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba District stated, "I also have a home in the Roanoke City which unfortunately was a black mark, as some people are saying, as yesterday's lack of courage to vote on this. My husband is a disabled vet of almost 21 years and I served right along with him. And I believe that this county should be a sanctuary. The reason I believe that is because he fought for the freedoms of all of the Constitution. The Second Amendment is very important, because as soon as you drop this, or you let this not be a sanctuary city, it is a slippery slope before they take your next right away from you. I believe that Roanoke County should be a sanctuary city. There is a lot of people out here with a lot of guns, and I believe that if you think that the schools will not be protected is delusional because there's going to be crime and people that are going to be getting guns all over the place. Why take it away from the law abiding citizens? We deserve better than that. By sitting there having somebody in the north, in Roanoke, I mean in Richmond, sit there and tell us that we can't own our guns, that is just, it's delusional to think that it's going to stop a crime. Taking the guns is only going to bring in more crime. Sorry, I believe that. So for these 502 December 3, 2019 people that sit there and say that the age in this room, it shows wisdom, because there is hundreds of people which the media does not see, is those rooms up there are standing room only for the people that are believing in the sanctuary cities. I believe it is your responsibility as us that had put you there to listen to your people, and we are saying that we want a sanctuary city. Roger Dixon of 3746 Bradshaw Road in Salem, Virginia, in Roanoke County stated, "I want to talk a little bit about the history and what we can learn from history, and what's been forgotten about history. The Roman Empire was one of the greatest of all times. The Roman Empire had the best troops, had the best equipment, had the best leaders, had the best supply line. Due to the politics, the Roman Empire fell apart from the inside, it destructed itself. In 1938 Adolph Hitler informed the German citizens that it would be in their best interests for them to bring their firearms down to the police station, have them register it, and that way if there's any kind of crime committed, that we could find the criminals. By 1943, they had confiscated all the guns. And on his way to confiscating all the guns, he went ahead and almost captured all of Europe with the exception of Switzerland. Switzerland had enacted a law that says all citizens are required by law to own a firearm. Let's go back to why Hitler was elected to his leadership position. People often ask why would somebody elect a man like Adolph Hitler into power. Well, Adolph Hitler didn't sound like a dictator when he was running for office. He sounded like an American politician. I'd like to fast forward to my young years in the 70s, sitting on the front porch on Independence Day. My uncles would come in, and they would tell stories. They took us all around the world, the liberation of France, to the Pacific where my uncle was shot shooting down kamikaze pilots crashing planes into the side of the USS Hornet, it was later shot by a torpedo, sunk to the bottom of the Pacific. My uncle survived the shark infested waters only to come home to Wytheville, Virginia and drink himself to death. I also answered the knock on the door at 3:00 a.m. at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. `Where we going, don't worry about it, you'll get the word, grab your rucksack, discharge, get your weapons out of the armory, we'll let you know.' I did what I had to do to put the stop to Communism, Socialism, with the Russians and the Cubans in the West Indies. I hope that this is not what it's come to in the United States to have to come in here and beg the Board Members to protect our Constitutional rights. God bless our troops in the United States military, God bless our commander in chief, and God bless the United States of America." Thomas Whiter of 6295 Martindale Avenue stated, "I just wanted to, I'm not very well prepared, but I wanted to talk to you all. I'm not originally from here. One of the reasons I chose Virginia was because of the Second Amendment rights that we have. I come from a country where we don't have Second Amendment rights, or if we do, they are very, very hard to get. I think it's very important. I've seen what's happened in the U.K. I've seen violent crime. I was in school when we had a school shooting, not at that school, but I was in school, going to school at the same time, and what they did back in the 70s and the 80s was they made sure that everybody registered their firearms, and then what happened was, is that after we had the school shooting, they December 3, 2019 503 went round and knocked on the doors of everybody who had firearms, and they said, you've got to hand them in in six months, if you don't, we're locking you up. And what happened was violent crime went up 400%. It's a big problem, it's something that's very near and dear to my heart. I've got two little girls. I train with them. I was in the British military. I later worked with the U.S. military as a contractor, a defense contractor. I've been to lots of not so nice countries where they don't have the rights and freedoms that we have to. They are oppressed by the dictators of their countries, and I can see the potential for a country that doesn't have firearms rights for that to be a slow creep. don't think it's something that's just going to happen overnight, but today we'll be talking about 10 rounds, magazine capacity rounds, and then it might be that in my children's generation, they might be standing here trying to defend a five round magazine. Or maybe it will be everybody's down to revolvers. As my daughters grow up, women are lots of fantastic, wonderful attributes that women have. I believe a lot of women are very, very clever. My daughters are a lot smarter than I am, they pick up on a lot of things that I don't. But they are the fairer sex. They are not strong as the average man. And I want them to be able to defend themselves. If somebody were to break in, and it's the middle of the night, I would want them to be able to defend themselves against that. I'm a big guy. A lot of people move out of the way when I walk down the road. When I'm an old man, I want to be able to protect myself because I'm going to become old and frail too. And it might be that I need more than a 10 round magazine. If there's several people that come in and they're hopped up on some kind of drug, should a law abiding citizen not be allowed to protect themselves? Should we not be allowed to train so that we're proficient with those firearms? I think these are all very important things, and hope that you guys consider that today, and I hope that you decide to let this become a sanctuary county. Thank you for your time." Sergeant Matt Surrenant of 8005 Xenon Drive stated, "I'm a combat medic with the United States Army, and I've been faithfully serving my country for the past 14 years. I'm also a licensed personal protection specialist through the DCJS, and I carry a firearm every day for work. I've served in Afghanistan with the 82nd Airborne Division from 2010 to 2011, been deployed all over the world in service to this great country. I'm highly trained and proficient with firearms and as such wish to speak to you today regarding the unconstitutional laws that the Democrats are trying to push upon law abiding citizens. Since our country's founding, the Second Amendment has been interpreted no other way than it was meant to be interpreted. Allow me to recite it for you: "A well -regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I have a very hard time accepting this to be interpreted any other way than what one of our founding fathers James Madison intended it to be. In Federalist Papers No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, a standing army would be opposed by a militia. He argued that state militias would be able to repeal the danger of a federal army. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. He contrasted the federal government 504 December 3, 2019 of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms" and assured that the existence of a subordinate government forms of a barrier against the enterprise of ambition. Knowing this, I have to doubt the mental competence of any elected leader who blatantly disregards these facts and pursues a way to disarm a free people. It fits an evil agenda, and if these laws pass, I assure you many more greater evils will soon follow. These proposals are a slap in the face to the men and women who have fought and died to uphold their oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Today I not only ask that you make Roanoke a safe haven for patriots that believe in our Constitutional rights, I also call upon you to unify against these criminals who would try to disarm us. Send a letter to Richmond and ask for the impeachment of anyone trying to deface our great nation's Constitution. You owe it to your children and all of the citizens who elected you, whether they agree with this stance or not, to uphold your oath to the Constitution. For now, I can only pray that this evil is put to rest and our nation's history of proud firearms owners can continue to freely express their God-given rights. Remember, all that is necessary for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing. Thank you for your time and God bless." Jason Glass of 5212 Sundance Road, Salem, Virginia, stated, "I'm about to go on camera and admit that I am willing to become a Class 6 and Class 5 felon in the near future, which will invoke the Red Flag Law if somebody so sees fit. Under a lot of these regulations, if you take the magazines and the AR15s, if I had grandchildren, they would never get out of jail, if you counted each one. I'm here to tell you why I need an AR15.Genocide is the intentional action to destroy a people. Since 1900, 57 million people have been killed by their governments. Not that I have anything against government; it is a necessary evil. And I think that we do it, but it ought to be restrained. And it ought to be restrained by the Second Amendment. I am a part of the Virginia Militia. Anyone who is in this state who has a gun is considered a part of the Virginia Militia, and I'll read that to you: The militia of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall consist of all able-bodied residents of the Commonwealth who are citizens of the United States and all other able-bodied persons resident in the Commonwealth who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, who are at least 16 years of age and, except as hereinafter provided, not more than 55 years of age. The militia shall be divided into three classes: the National Guard, which includes the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard; the Virginia Defense Force; and the unorganized militia. That would be the 2.5 million gun owners in this state. Now let that sink in. Thirty percent of this state, roughly 25 percent would—all of the guns they own will become illegal under most of these regulations. It's ridiculous. I, for one, will not comply. Period. Don't know what that means for my life, and I have a good one. I live in a wonderful country and in a wonderful state. We live in a place where you can worship whoever you want, where you can whatever you want, where you can be whoever you want to be no matter where you've been at in life. If you decide to, you can make a good life for yourself here. And I think that those things are guarded by the Constitution. And December 3, 2019 505 although I have not been to law school, I am fairly certain that any law passed which goes against the Constitution is null and void. And any person who has sworn their allegiance to and their oath to the Constitution can disregard that law. Thank you very much." Douglas Coordes of 7887 Hollins Court Drive in Roanoke County stated, "As a former military officer, competitive small bore and high-power rifle shooter, and father of four daughters, I urge you to make Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary. By the way, two of my daughters did decrease the deer population over the weekend. The reasons are as follows: 1) The Code of Virginia, 44-1 Composition of a militia. "The militia of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall consist of all able-bodied residents of the Commonwealth who are citizens of the United States and all other able- bodied persons resident in the Commonwealth who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, who are at least 16 years of age and, except as hereinafter provided, not more than 55 years of age. The militia shall be divided into three classes: the National Guard, which includes the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard; the Virginia Defense Force; and the unorganized militia. With the laws which are being proposed by the state legislature, the proper arming of the unorganized militia would be greatly curtailed as historically the militia members were required to provide their own weapons 2) The laws being proposed would only affect law-abiding citizens of the Commonwealth. Those who have evil in their heart to do dastardly deeds will not be concerned with following the laws. 3) Home invasions typically involve multiple intruders against a single homeowner. I do not want my ability to protect myself or my family being hampered by the number of bullets which I may have in my firearm. 4) The provisions in the proposed laws would drastically affect sport shooters and hunters. The AR rifle—which stands ArmaLite rifle and not assault rifle—is used in competitive and sports shooting. The cost to modify such a rifle to meet the proposed laws is equivalent to the cost of a new rifle by the time you pay for parts and gunsmith services. Hunters and shooters have collapsible stocks. It always the firearm to grow as they do. Pistol grips, thumbhole stocks, classical stocks, and flash suppressors are mere cosmetics and do nothing to affect the actual functioning of a firearm. In conclusion, I know that we shall be legally bound by the laws which are passed by the Virginia Legislature. But if Roanoke County joins with other counties in declaring itself a Second Amendment sanctuary will further help send a message that our rights to keep and bear arms should not be infringed upon. Thank you." Randall Horton of 324 10th Street in Vinton stated, "I thank you for the opportunity to come before you today to speak on the concerns of the people of Roanoke County and the town of Vinton. Yesterday, I and many others spoke before the Roanoke City Council. Unfortunately, our words fell on deaf ears having already made the decision before the hearing even started. Before even hearing a single person speak they'd already made their minds up. The major rendered his decision without even a moment's deliberation. His decision was to just not even address it, to do absolutely nothing. And I pray that this is not the case here in Roanoke County. By now 506 December 3, 2019 you've heard people who have presented statistics and facts concerning the Constitution, the rule of law, and the complete and utter ineffectiveness of gun laws on the criminal element, and how such laws only affect and diminish the protection of responsible, honest, and law-abiding gun owners. I come to you today as a minister and representative of our Heavenly Father, as well as the people of Roanoke County and Vinton. I never thought in my lifetime that the citizens of this country would have to turn to local, city, and county governments for the protection against tyranist [sic] and unconstitutional laws imposed by the state. It's been said guns don't create a sanctuary. We seek not to create a sanctuary with guns, but a sanctuary to protect our right to keep and bear them. Set forth by our founding forefathers who knew if we lose our Second Amendments right our First Amendment rights will soon follow. And then others after that. It's been said guns take the lives our children. The guns themselves take the lives of no one. We took prayer and even God Himself out of our schools. We abandoned the teachings of righteousness, respect, responsibility, God, and country, replacing them with a culture where violence is glorified in music, on television and entertainment. And then allow these things to raise and teach our children. But this is what's [unintelligible]. And wonder why they kill each other in school and on the street. Rather than place the blame in the home where it belongs, they blame it on the guns. My daddy gave me my first rifle when I was eight years old. Taught me to use it responsibly. Taught me respect. When I did wrong, he patted my behind. I still have that rifle. And in almost fifty years, that rifle nor any other firearm that I own has ever harmed another person. Thank you. And I ask that God help you in your decision, and God bless you all." Jacob Cochran of 723 Delaware Street stated, "Hello Council, everyone. I'm no public speaker. I'm not good speaking in front of crowds, whatnot. But our Second Amendment clearly states that a well -regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state. The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and infringed, that's actively breaking terms of [unintelligible] agreement. This is unlawful and in direct violation of our constitutional rights. And it is our God-given right. Jesus said, Luke 22:36, "But now whoever has a purse or a bag must take it, and whoever does not have a sword must sell his cloak and buy one." Luke 11:21, "When a strong man fully armed guards his own house, his palace and goods are safe." And I'm going to go back to what George Washington said, "A free people not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them," which would their own government. If y'all do not pass this for Roanoke County to become a Second Amendment sanctuary, y'all would be breaking an oath. Y'all took an oath to protect our laws and our Constitution. It's just kinda crazy that these people have to take time out of their days to come out here and argue this because it's honestly insanity. People need to keep and bear arms. That's all I have to say." Ryan Brook of 5455 Winterset Drive stated, "It's at Cave Spring, part of Supervisor Assad's district. I want to thank the chairman, vice chairman, and December 3, 2019 507 supervisors for allowing us to speak today. I've been a Roanoke County resident since the day I was born. I served in the Army. Currently an Army officer for the last eight years. And more importantly, I'm a citizen of the U.S., though, under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and subject thereto. I've worked with the County before with some of the past County attorneys, Attorney Mahoney and Kuhnel. Worked with Supervisor Assaid on some of these gun issues and tried to get the County to straighten out some of their code that had fallen behind times. I believe the Board has made a lot of corrections to that code and has even reduced the concealed handgun permit fee, thankfully, although not quite to the low level we would have liked. There are so many state and federal laws already on the books. And gun owners are not against illegal uses of firearms by criminals; we want the criminals prosecuted. But that is not on the firearm that caused the crime; it is on the criminal. And criminals do not follow the law. Kneejerk emotional reactions to try and prevent gun violence using some of these, quote, common sense laws, do nothing for actually preventing the shootings, but create more burden on the law-abiding citizens. Usually this wanting to pass more gun laws to help prevent shootings from a good place with good intentions. But when was the last time you saw a criminal follow the law? Inherently they don't; that's what makes them a criminal. There is no statistical evidence to suggest that more gun control laws will lower crime. Many more gun laws have been past and never rescinded. And there are so many on the books already. Any further laws to limit our right to keep and bear arms is simply unacceptable. Every compromise has been gun owners' rights further infringed upon while the Democrats or those wishing for the feel -good laws to be passed get what they wanted. Although some courts have ruled these proposed laws as constitutional, historically those courts have not used strict scrutiny under which many other rights are judged upon. Already proven ineffective and some even ruled in conflict with the Heller decision include assault weapons bans, which was highly cosmic; magazine capacity limits and one -handgun -a -month laws; and gun -free zones. People arguing that back in the day they had muskets not the technological firearms we have today are ill informed because they did have pepper -box revolvers and other high-capacity firearms back in the day. And Adams even said that the Second Amendment was applicable to owning a canon for a normal civilian. Universal background checks do nothing but de facto registration red flag gun laws though well-intentioned do nothing but unlawful confiscation without due process. I'm closing. Second Amendment sanctuaries show Richmond that their level of disconnect with the majority of their state based on their currently proposed gun legislation. Thirty-one counties out of ninety-four in Virginia are now Second Amendment sanctuaries, which is a third of the state just about. That says something. Show you listen to the majority of your constituents who showed up today and honor your oath as an oath keeper not an oath breaker to the Constitution. I took an oath in the Army to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. And so help me God, I will. I implore you to pass this sanctuary resolution and make Roanoke County a Second Amendment sanctuary. Thank you." 508 December 3, 2019 Jonathan Payne of 532 Dexter Road stated, "As an average American citizen, I conduct myself towards my fellow man in kindness and longsuffering, seeking not conflict but harmony in all that I do, believing not in hate of violence as an effective means of resolution, rather in communication and debate. These things being true, I do, however, harbor deeply within my heart and soul for acts of willful injustice a hatred, abhorrence, and righteous anger so great that it is for this specific reason that I speak today. For the Founding Fathers were abundantly clear: The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. In spite of these great words, we stand now on the edge of the greatest injustice any member of mankind can know. Let not the direness of this situation be lost on any among you today. Make no mistake. The Second Amendment does not exist purely for the purpose of hunting or self-defense. These are but mere benefits. The true purpose of our God-given right affirmed by the United States Constitution is outlined in our great Declaration of Independence. Quote, "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." We the American people are being disarmed for one reason and one reason only: because a corrupt government cannot stand while there are good men with the means to resist it. The evil powers that be are not after your guns; they've after your freedoms. For they see absolutely domination and power over you. Your weapons, your courage, and your convictions are all that stand in the way of ultimate evil. If we do not resist now in times of relative peace, we will be powerless to fight in times of absolute tyranny. We have in place a system of government intended to represent the wishes of the people, which is why it is imperative that you, the members of local government, hear now the wishes of the people as we make them known loud and clear. For the truths that we hold to be self-evident are being forcibly taken from us. As public servants of the American people, it is your civic duty to listen to our pleadings and act according to morality and natural law, laws granted to us by God and affirmed by the founding documents of our great nation. True American patriots, of whom there are many amongst us today, stand at the ready, ever watchful. For if our system of government fails to uphold our natural rights by protecting us from wicked usurpations, the security of freedom then falls upon American patriots. For patriots are the true guardians of freedom and the final line of defense against absolute tyranny. And while a Second Amendment resolution now may only postpone the inevitable evil being brought upon us by the traitors in power, it does buy us more time to live peacefully. However, if you fail your God -appointed duties to represent the people whom you serve, then you will have willfully failed the only civil means of the people to reach peaceful resolution. And this is my last paragraph. So I implore you, the members of the Board of Supervisors, you must vote to protect our God-given rights to keep and bear arms. For without a means December 3, 2019 509 of defense, all other rights are subject to removal. For if you fail today, if you stand on the side of evil by allowing the natural rights of every citizen you serve to be stamped out, your dereliction of your duty will be an unmistakable signal to the American people that you have willfully and recklessly abandoned your sacred oath to uphold the true founding law of the land. And in doing so, the responsibility of protection of a free state falls from your hands into the hand of every American patriot. Thank you." RESOLUTION 120319-1 DECLARING ROANOKE COUNTY A SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY COUNTY WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Supervisors have taken an oath to defend and uphold the constitutions of the United States and Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads: "A well -regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"; and WHEREAS, Article I, § 13 of the Virginia Constitution reads: "A well -regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"; and WHEREAS, the Board is concerned that certain legislation pre -filed for introduction in the 2020 Virginia General Assembly, and certain legislation that has been introduced in the United States Congress, may have the effect of infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens to bear arms, as guaranteed by the United States and Virginia Constitutions; and WHEREAS, the Board is concerned that passage of these bills, imposing unnecessary burdens on law-abiding citizens and inviting further regulations and burdens, and if to be enforced by local officials, will impose on the County unfunded mandates, whether as a formal mandate or as a practical requirement of enforcing the law; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has expressed its intent, in Section 15.2-915 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, that rules, regulations, and administrative actions "governing the purchase, possession, transfer, ownership, carrying, storage or transporting of firearms, ammunition, or components or combination thereof," other than workplace rules or other actions "expressly authorized by statute," is an exclusive preserve of State government; and WHEREAS, local law enforcement is the responsibility and preserve of the Chief of Police, the Sheriff and the Commonwealth's Attorney; and the Sheriff and Commonwealth's Attorney are independently elected officers under the Virginia Constitution; and WHEREAS, nevertheless, the Board wishes to express its sentiments, together with the sentiments of the Roanoke County community as a whole, with regard to this 510 December 3, 2019 important matter, and its continuing intent to take lawful action to protect these important rights. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, that: 1. Roanoke County is hereby declared a Second Amendment Sanctuary County, wherein the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for the purposes of lawful self-defense, community defense, and hunting, as protected by the United States and Virginia Constitutions, is part of the fabric of the community since before the foundation of the Republic, and is and must be respected and celebrated; and 2. Roanoke County urges the General Assembly, the United States Congress, and other agencies of State and Federal government not to adopt, accept, or enact any provision, law, or regulation that may infringe, have the tendency to infringe, or place any additional burdens on the right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms; and 3. Roanoke County expresses its intent to continue to take lawful actions to protect and support the rights of its citizens to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the United States and Virginia Constitutions; and 4. Roanoke County opposes, in particular, any provision, law, or regulation that may impose additional regulatory burdens on its citizens or result in mandates, whether mandatory or practical, to expend additional public funds on enforcement or administration of such laws, or to require the constitutional officers of the locality to do so; and 5. The County Administrator is directed to cause true copies of this resolution to be forwarded to the County's representatives in the General Assembly and the United States Congress, and to the Governor of Virginia; and 6. This resolution is effective upon adoption. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Radford and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS IN RE: BRIEFINGS December 3, 2019 511 1. Briefing to discuss with the Board of Supervisors the 2020 Real Estate Assessment and Roanoke Valley Economic Conditions (Kenneth Fay, Director of Real Estate; Meredith Thompson, Budget Division Director; Steve Elliott, Budget Manager) Briefing was given. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the topics and issues addressed herein (Peter Lubeck, Acting County Attorney) Mr. Lubeck introduced Eldon James and went over the changes made after the agenda was published. Chairman North commented with regard to SmartScale funding, we had a dialog with Senator Newman back in August. We need to go back and revisit that. What we are really asking for is a revisit on the calculation. Delegate Thomas was walking encyclopedia of information and hopes that we can get some of that before he goes off to retirement. Mr. James advised he has worked with Delegate Thomas and his spiel from last year that dealt with return on investment and provided it to Delegate McNamara. He is looking really hard at that and we will continue. He will see Delegate Thomas at a meeting tomorrow and he will follow-up. Chairman North stated as far as certain comments our stance in the agenda on SmartScale was a tax increase is incorrect. We are saying there are funds laying around somewhere else and let's put some of them back into SmartScale so that maybe SW Virginia can get a little bit more than we have in the past. Mr. James advised there is nothing in the County's platform that asks for a tax increase. Chairman North agreed and commented that some people read that into and he just wanted to set the record straight. RESOLUTION 120319-2 ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2020 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND PETITIONING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of local and statewide concern to be considered by the 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and 512 December 3, 2019 WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program for the 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following initiatives are submitted as its Legislative Program for the 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly, for its favorable consideration and adoption. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Transportation............................................................................. 2 2. Economic Development.................................................................. 3 3. Health and Human Services........................................................... 3 4. Education.................................................................................... 5 5. Public Safety................................................................................ 6 1. Transportation a. The County supports expedited action to address the causes for declining growth in transportation revenues and to develop recommendations to grow revenue over time to meet increasing demands for new construction and maintenance for existing transportation infrastructure. Such action must address the secondary road needs of counties throughout the Commonwealth, as such funding has been vastly reduced over the past 10 years. b. The County supports directing additional funds to SMART SCALE, as the available funding has decreased almost 40 percent between Round One ($1.4 Billion) and Round 3 ($850 Million). Further, the County supports changes to simplify the Smart Scale process for allocating transportation funds to reduce time and costs to prepare and review applications. c. The County requests continued study and consideration of projects to improve U.S. Route 460. d. The County encourages continued funding of the Capital Improvement Projects identified in the 1-81 Corridor Improvement Plan; completion of this project is imperative to the VDOT Salem District to improve safety, reliability and economic development potential. e. The County opposes any legislation that seeks to increase truck size or weight beyond the current federal standards, thereby stressing the capacity of the Commonwealth's road systems and putting highways, roads, and bridges at risk of increased damage or deterioration. 2. Economic Development a. Broadband i. The County urges the Commonwealth to provide adequate funding assistance to counties to build the necessary telecommunications infrastructure to deploy universal affordable access to the internet for all areas, particularly in underserved rural areas. December 3, 2019 513 ii. The County supports legislation that provides additional tools for counties to finance, build and operate open access networks in partnership with commercial internet service providers. iii. The County encourages the Commonwealth to increase funding for grants provided through the 2020 Virginia Telecommunications Initiative (VATI). 3. Health and Human Services a. Children's Services Act i. The County supports enhancing the ability of local school divisions to serve children with disabilities in their neighborhood schools, to include flexibility in use of state pool funds to serve children with high-level needs in local or regional programs tailored to meet those needs, and additional support for special education wraparound services to help support children in their communities. ii. The County supports legislation to allow public schools to establish and fund (together with the local governing body and school board) special education programs (and related services) within public day schools. iii. In the alternative, the County requests that the Department of Education develop a pilot program, in certain local school divisions, allowing a process for redirecting federal, state and local funds (including CSA funds), for the purpose of providing services currently offered in a private day setting in the public school setting. b. Mental Health i. The County strongly supports a sustained focus by the state on Virginia's mental health services system to ensure, through evaluation and investment, that appropriate and effective outpatient and in-patient services are available across the Commonwealth. ii. The County encourages reforms that provide for alternative placement for local jail inmates with serious mental health issues which should not be left to be addressed by jail personnel. iii. Catawba Hospital currently serves the needs of the local and regional public safety agencies, jails, and community hospitals by providing accessible in inpatient emergency services for community members in crisis. Catawba Hospital's services are unique and essential; it provides geriatric services to approximately half of geographical area of the Commonwealth in addition to the regional needs of adult consumers with serious mental illness. The County supports legislation that would appropriate necessary and vital funding for Catawba Hospital to expand its capacity to meet the ongoing emergent needs of the Commonwealth. 4. Education 514 December 3, 2019 a. The County urges the General Assembly to provide full state funding for public education (k through 12). Full state funding should be achieved without reduction to other parts of state public education budgets or to other core local services. b. The County requests elimination of the Support Staff Funding Cap. The support staff cap, which was implemented during the Great Recession, disproportionately limits local capacity to serve students with special needs, at -risk students, English learners, and other challenged populations. Positions such as Mental Health Specialists, Instructional Assistants, and other classroom supports are a cost-effective way to put caring adults in the lives of our most needy students, but the Support Staff Funding Cap arbitrarily excludes the actual cost of educating challenged populations. The funding for these critical positions currently falls completely to local school divisions. Legislative action is requested to remove the funding cap on such positions. c. The County supports legislation to increase funding for teacher compensation. County schools and school divisions across the Commonwealth face both quantity and quality issues regarding the recruitment and retention of teachers and other professional staff positions. d. The County supports increased licensure flexibility. To assist local school divisions in attracting and retaining qualified and effective teachers and other staff, positions in the Standards of Quality should be funded by function (for example, curriculum development and support, instructional technology, school leadership, student support) rather than individual position title. Division superintendents also need the flexibility to hire effective teachers to teach in hard -to -fill content areas, regardless of rigid state licensure requirements. 5. Public Safety a. The County opposes proposals to extend the time frame during which an emergency custody order remains valid; any extension beyond the present 8 -hour period would be to the detriment of the individual suffering from mental illness (by delaying needed treatment), and would unreasonably burden local law enforcement officers (who would continue to retain custody and provide supervision of the individual). b. The County affirms its commitment to citizens' Second Amendment rights (memorialized in the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia) , and opposes gun -control measures that would unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of County citizens to bear arms. The County's position on this issue is more fully set forth in Resolution 120319-1, considered by the Board on December 3, 2019. December 3, 2019 515 On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None 2. Presentation of Year End Financial Results for June 30, 2019, acceptance of audit report and allocation of year end funds (Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services) A-120319-3 Chris Banta, Partner with Broward Edwards provided an overview of the audit. There was no discussion. Supervisor Peters' motion to accept the June 30, 2019 year-end audit and allocate year-end funds was seconded by Supervisor North and was approved by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES discussion. 1. Ordinance approving a lease with AMC Investors, Inc. for placement of County Communications and Information Technology infrastructure (Bill Hunter, Director of Communications and Information Technology) Mr. Hunter advised no changes since the first reading. There was no ORDINANCE 120319-4 APPROVING A LEASE WITH AMC INVESTORS, INC. FOR PLACEMENT OF COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE WHEREAS, the County provides public safety services to its citizens and needs to place various communications equipment at non -County locations to facilitate communications throughout the County; and WHEREAS, given the topography of the County, such equipment is most effective when placed on elevated locations, such as mountain peaks; and 516 December 3, 2019 WHEREAS, the County has identified Brushy Mountain as a viable spot for placement of Communications and Information Technology (COMM -IT) equipment to support the public safety radio system; WHEREAS, the County has re -negotiated a long-standing contract with a County landowner for a ground lease on Brushy Mountain for such equipment; and WHEREAS, such a lease will provide tangible and intangible benefits to the County as it provides public safety services to persons in the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.03 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the County is authorized to acquire property, including the lease of real estate; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real estate shall be accomplished by ordinance, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 19, 2019, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 3, 2019. 3. That the execution of a Lease Agreement ("Agreement") with AMC Investors, Inc., to lease a certain parcel of land on Brushy Mountain is authorized. 4. That the lease term shall commence on January 1, 2020, and continue through December 31, 2020, unless terminated as provided in the Agreement. 5. That the rent shall be $300 per month during the term of the Agreement. 6. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of the Board of Supervisors in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the lease of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None 2. Ordinance approving the purchase of 30 Chestnut Ridge Road (Tax Map Number 080.00-05-19.02-0000) from Elizabeth Austin Talbott and authorizing the execution of a Contract of Purchase, Vinton Magisterial District (Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) Mr. Blount advised there were no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion. December 3, 2019 517 ORDINANCE 120319-5 APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF 30 CHESTNUT RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NUMBER 080.00-05-19.02- 0000) FROM ELIZABETH AUSTIN TALBOTT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT OF PURCHASE WHEREAS, Elizabeth Austin Talbott owns one parcel of real estate property situated on 30 Chestnut Ridge Road, Roanoke County, Virginia, bearing Official Tax Map Numbers 080.00-05-.02-0000, which contains 2.0 acres; and WHEREAS, Elizabeth Austin Talbott is desirous of selling the Property to the County of Roanoke (the "County") and the County is desirous of acquiring the Property for the purposes of developing, constructing, operating and maintaining a public park and trail system; and WHEREAS, a purchase agreement has been prepared between Elizabeth Austin Talbott and the County, providing for the purchase of the property in "AS IS" condition at a total purchase price of $50,000 for the above-mentioned parcel located at 30 Chestnut Ridge Road; and WHEREAS, this ordinance authorizes the purchase of 30 Chestnut Ridge Road parcel, upon the terms and conditions set out in the above-mentioned Purchase Agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading for this ordinance was held on November 19, 2019. The second reading of this ordinance was held on December 3, 2019. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the purchase of a 2.0 acre parcel located 30 Chestnut Ridge Road (Tax Map Number 080.00-05-19.02-0000) from Elizabeth Austin Talbott, upon certain terms and conditions as set forth in a Purchase Agreement, is hereby approved and authorized; and 2. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None 518 December 3, 2019 IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION 120319-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM H- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December 3, 2019, designated as Item H - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2 inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of appointments to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors (at Large), Roanoke County Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (at Large), Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (at Large), Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority (at Large) 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $42,564 from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) for an Emergency Management Performance Grant On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None A -120319-6.a A -120319-6.b IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Peters moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report IN RE: CLOSED MEETING December 3, 2019 519 At 6:23 p.m., Supervisor North moved to go into closed meeting following the work sessions pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A .1 - Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment; assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body; namely the County Attorney and Section 2.2-3711.A.1 - Discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for employment; assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees of any public body; namely the Commonwealth Attorney The motion was seconded by Supervisor Peters carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None The closed meeting was held from 8:03 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint work session between the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke County Public School Board Chairman North welcomed the School Board members. School Board Chairman Butzer called the Roanoke County School Board to order; all school board members were present with the exception of Mr. Wray. Chairman North stated that he hopes the work session is a productive discussion and meeting that will be beneficial to both the schools as well as the County. Roanoke County School Board Chairman Butzer stated that in July the discussion was opened about the condition of some of the school facilities. The facilities mentioned were the ones the needed significant renovation or a new rebuild. At the last meeting there was a lot of information to digest and a large dollar amount connected to that information. During that period of time several school board members have had discussions with our peers on the other side and have talked through the issue. Daniel R. O'Donnell, County Administrator stated staff has been working through some preliminary budget numbers and are trying to determine what can be done. The preliminary discussion shows what we think we will be able to do and we hope that it will allow to move some of the projects forward. Mr. O'Donnell turned the meeting over to Rebecca Owens, Assistant County Administrator who 520 December 3, 2019 provided a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Mr. O'Donnell stated issues that would impact this year's budget would be compensation, VRS, health insurance and contractual increases. In terms of capital, last year we were waiting on the facilities assessment, so we will need to push up our capital maintenance based on the outcome of the assessment. Also, there were a couple of vehicles that were deferred in order to fund higher increases for the County employees, i.e. a fire truck and trash truck. Additionally, there are staffing needs. Staff is looking at a SAFER grant that would require a County match, but hopefully leverage some federal funds that will help us deal with staffing issues as related to Fire and Rescue. The big piece of the budget last year that we still do not know about are the outside agencies fixed costs, i.e. Authorities and regional entities that we have to pay. For example, tipping fees for the Resource Authority, Western Virginia Regional Jail costs went up. Juvenile detention costs are very high and we have talked about CSA. These costs will have to be faced and one initiative that he would like to put in next year is the rural broadband initiative. We recognize we have some holes in our rural areas. We are trying to budget for matching funds (Virginia Telecommunications Funds) that require a twenty percent (20%) match. There are a lot of unknowns in the budget that makes him cautious. Mr. O'Donnell stated that one of the outcomes of reviewing this information was to never let this go another ten or fifteen years before revisiting. He further added that he would like to see it reviewed every three years for consideration to see if changes need to be made. For example, we really don't know constructions costs. We are working on better cost estimates. Additionally, there is declining enrollment and we might have to look at keeping every single school. School Board Member Tim Greenway asked Mr. O'Donnell if they evaluated why there is declining enrollment. Mr. `Donnell advised not in great detail; we have an aging population. We do have economic growth, but it is marginal. Mr. O'Donnell then reiterated that the recommendation is to allocate $200,000 at year end and in next year's budget to begin funding the 12-12-12 program and to update the comprehensive financial policy to reflect that. School Board Chairman Butzer stated that construction costs is something they pay a lot of attention to. We are trying to get them updated as much as we can. There are several sources that we use, the Virginia Department of Education data, which is a good source. It lists the most recent projects through the State. School Board Chairman Butzer noted that the relationship between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board is top notch. The School Board realizes that they are very lucky to have the relationship they currently have with their December 3, 2019 521 counterparts. Mr. Butzer stated with regard to construction costs, the numbers that we came up with for William Byrd, W. E. Cundiff and Glen Cove, we used $225 a square foot on average. The State average right now for an elementary school is up to $301 and a high school is $329. So, we got the Cave Spring High School for $239. So the escalation that we are seeing in constructions costs are astounding in a good economy. If the economy falls apart, then you will have a better number. He appreciates the progress that we have made here and the offer that is there, but his only concern is that he is not sure we can get these projects done for the money we originally thought. Another thing we have done and will do is to take the budget that we know that we have and work with some contractors, if we can get approval on the procurement side, and see if they can build these schools for that budget. We know we are struggling with construction costs. The other problems is that is suddenly there are some State funds to do school construction, school construction costs will do up. All of the projects are local and we know construction costs are local, so some of the State averages may include areas more expensive. The second is that we will actually take a look at different kinds of construction. We understand that we have to live within what we have. He added that he is especially concerned with Byrd Cundiff and Glen Cove. He believes there is an inequity for those kids. With regard to enrollment, there was a slide that showed population going up. If you look at the enrollment that has declined, what school would anyone suggest that we close. Mr. O'Donnell reiterated that is down the line. Chairman Butzer stated that is something they look at all the time. Glen Cove, because of the condition that it is in, we have a beautiful underutilized school in Masons Cove that is not that far away. This year they moved 50 children from Glen Cove over to Masons Cove. We think we might be able to do more of those adjustments because doing them the way we did them, voluntarily, saves a lot of angst in the community. They will continue to look at enrollments. If we can close a facility that we don't need, we are going to do it. He appreciates the progress that has been made, because it is $2 million more that they had last time, but we need to step back, regroup and actually see how that applies to what we really need or think we need to do. We will work diligently to see if we can work within those numbers and get the schools fixed. Board Member Tim Greenway stated he would like to visit the 12-12- 12 concept. So, if he looks at this from the last 15 year perspective, and used inflation for that $10 million, we would be somewhere near $12.5 or $13. So, they have lost on our 2 to 1 ratio, there is $15 million they did not have for those structures or facilities and we could have incrementally done this in a much easier way to get there. We do appreciate the $12 million, but it is not where we should be. Is there appetite or thought that we put an inflationary factor in there now so that future Boards don't have to deal with it. Chairman North stated it is in our Comphrensive Financial Policy that we look at once or twice every year. This goes along with what Mr. O'Donnell 522 December 3, 2019 stated that we need to look at this more frequently. Second to that, if you borrow more you have to pay more and that is what we are going to do. Unfortunately, we did not save enough in the last four (4) out of five (5) years. If we correct the sins of the past for not funding that debt reserve fund at $2.2. It had a lot more cash at one time and was taken out by the Schools and the County for maintenance. This is a big step to go to a twenty percent (20%) increase. School Board Member Greenway stated if we put the inflationary factor in now, we can still meet two times a year to change it, correct, but it is automatic to the year and you don't have to change the policy every year to add that inflationary factor in. He thinks it is a better way to do things. He just does not want Board to have to go through this again and not have some mechanism to raise that amount. Chairman North stated based on the discussion the Board has had with staff, what we consensus on what we have now, 12-12-12. School Board Chairman Butzer stated they totally agree that if we are asking to borrow money, we have to service that debt. Supervisor Peters stated the problem is that in 2015, we both took out $1 million for maintenance and we never put it back, which has caused the problem we are having today. He does agreed with Mr. Greenway that if inflation protection was put into this in 2004 when it was created, it would have taken care of itself as well. He agrees that it should be addressed as well. Mr. O'Donnell stated the only problem that he sees with that during a recessionary period, we were able to hold the contribution to the schools the same, but on the County side we had to cut services, but to tie to an index like that without looking at it every year, you build an increase in costs and he is concerned about a financial downturn. Supervisor Peters stated there is no inflation during those years and if you tied it to the Federal CPI, there would be no increases in those years. School Board Member Greenway stated the other side of that is that we should be increasing that revenue, so it puts pressure on our counterparts to make sure that we are increasing that revenue, not from a tax structure but as an economic driver. So, in business you do not want to stay stagnant, so that is his only comment. Supervisor Peters stated if you look at any other aspect of our life, nothing has stayed flat since 2004, but yet we have stayed at $10 million and that has been his issue with it for a number of years, whether it is building a library or a school, those costs will continue to go up and we have tried to stay within that same model, which puts projects further and further behind. Ms. Owens stated she feels this is a good start at twenty percent (20%). School Board Chairman Butzer reiterated they really appreciate the twenty percent (20%). We need to go back and take a good hard look at how that December 3, 2019 523 can be applied to the next three projects and what that does to the timetable. He added that they need to take a look at how the additional contribution and debt service impacts. He would suggest that we have another time. Chairman North stated just let us know when the $200,000 has been approved by the School Board. Mr. O'Donnell stated staff is prepared to make a recommendation at the next Board meeting to take the year-end $200,000 and put it in the capital plan. Ms. Owens added to also make the policy change in our Comprehensive Financial Policy to move the debt from $10 million to $12 million. Chairman North then stated going back to the inflation factor, if you borrow more, you have to save more. School Board member Jason Moretz asked if the $200,000 incremental is every year. It is a significant jump to what we are contributing now. Ms. Owens outlined the slide with the ten-year snapshot, we are going to add $200,000 to the already $2.2 and we are making the assumption that we are going to do that each and every year. We could come along in July of 2024 and determine that $12 million is the right amount and that we don't need to add any more funds and would get us back to the $3.2, which is where we were four or five years ago and that number would adequately fund the plan. Supervisor Peters asked if we know what the number to fully fund at $12 million. Ms. Owens responded that the $200,000 fully funds the plan to $12 million in debt through 3038. The work session was held from 6:49 p.m. until 7:42 p.m. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION At 8:39 p.m., Supervisor North moved to return to open session and adopt the certification resolution. RESOLUTION 120319-7 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 524 December 3, 2019 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Assaid, Hooker, Radford, Peters, North NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman North adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board Approved by: David F. Radford Chairman ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 The petition of MCE Owner Occupied, LLP to obtain a special use permit in a C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to allow a multi -family use to account for more than 50 percent of the gross floor area on the site on approximately 1.116 acres, located at 3220 McVitty Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District Philip Thompson Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for August 25, 2020. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of MCE Owner Occupied, LLP to obtain a special use permit in a C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to allow a multi -family use to account for more than 50 percent of the gross floor area on the site on approximately 1.116 acres, located at 3220 McVitty Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 25, 2020. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Ro N Community Development Planning & Zoning Y, 0 z J 1, 5204 Bernard Drive '8a P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 �-RZ -.7d65 on z, For Staff Use Only Date received: r Received by: Applica 'on fee: PUB A dat Placards issued: BOA date: Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning N Special Use 17 Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip Phone: (540) 344-0040 MCE Owner Occupied, LLP Work: 418 First Street, S.W. Cell #: Roanoke, VA 24011 Fax No.: _ (540) 339-9347 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: SAME AS APPLICANT Fax No. #: Property Location Magisterial District: Windsor Hills 3220 McVitty Road Roanoke, VA Community Planning area: Windsor Hills Tax Map No.: 076.20-01-12.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C-] Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.116 Existing Land Use: Former daycare center; building now vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAI VER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C-1 and sewer application Proposed Land Use: N ,,] famti-familily SUP permitting 100% of existing building plus 100% of future Phase 2 building for Adjoining property owners muluse_with or the o LsPagent or contract Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes x No _ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes R No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes -1 No _ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (WW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning O 1 cc in or rt Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin JUN 12 2029 Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the appllcatlan complete? Please check 1f enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BEA E ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. �� R/SIWICP V/AA R/SIW/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA i�0-* Consultation 8 1/2" x 1 V concept plan Application Application E�iWater Metes and bounds descriptionEj� Proffers, if applicable Justification and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner f c too or the o LsPagent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. By: Owner's Signature John Cr. Mc e d, Man - king Partner 2 GLENN FELDMANN GLENN FELDMANN DARBY&GOODLATTE June 12, 2020 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Philip Thompson Roanoke County Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, 2„d Floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 MARYELLEN F. GOODLATTE Direct Dial (540) 224-8018 E-mail nistooc€latte(iZelesiii%ldniami.com Re: Application for Special Use Permit: MCE Owner Occupied, LLP Tax Map Parcel: 076.20-01-12.00-0000 Property Address: 3220 McVitty Road Dear Philip: Enclosed please find the following in connection with the above -referenced application: 1. Special Use Permit Application with its exhibits; 2. Concept Plan; 3. List of adjoining property owners; and 4. Our firm's check in the amount of $154.50 ($150.00 filing fee; $4.50 technology fee). We represent the applicant in connection with this Application. Please let me know what additional information we can provide you as the County reviews this request. Very truly yours, Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:1nn:8308001 Enclosures c: MCE Owner Occupied, LLP (w/enc.) BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 37 Campbell Avenue S.W. I P.O. Box 2887 (24001) I Roanoke, Virginia 24011 , mArN 540 224 8000 l FAX 540 224 8050 I www.glennfeldmann.com Tr 111 MERITAS" LAW HRMS Yva Wlbp dYJS I IFYCATION QR REZONINQ,P1;GIA1r C1S1J P ,+ Rh)<I�T WAIVER QR .QMI' PT�AN (is 2 2232} REVIhiW Applicant MCE Owner Occupied, LLP The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional Space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PIAN (15.2-2332) REVIEW RE, QUESTS Applicant: MCF, Qwner Occupied, LLP Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance, The property at 3220 McVitty Road was last used as a child day care center with an authorized occupancy of up to 150 children. For over a year, the building has been vacant and the target of vandals, as illustrated on the photographs attached as Exhibits A-1 through AT3 (altered to obscure obscenities). The 1.1 acre parcel is zoned C-1. Its immediate McVitty Road adjoiners are commercial properties (zoned C-2) on one side, and residue acreage owned by the Commonwealth (zoned R-1) on the other side. Adjoining the subject parcel on the rear are lots fronting on Rasmont Road, zoned R-1. A significant grade differential (approximately 30 feet) exists between the rear of the subject property and the Rasmont Road parcels. As Phase 1 of the property's redevelopment, the applicant wishes to convert the existing building on the property from its current use as a child day care center to a multi -family apartment building containing 8 apartments. As illustrated on the floor plan attached as Exhibit B, two 2 -bedroom apartments (approximately 750 sf each) and two 1 -bedroom apartments (approximately 630 sf each) would be located on each floor. Except for adding new windows, an ADA entrance at the rear of the building, new exterior lights, and painting, the exterior of the existing building will remain substantially the same. Its footprint will not be enlarged. Exhibit C depicts the front elevation of the renovated building. Interior improvements will include new stairs and the addition of a second interior floor on each side of the existing middle two-story element. The existing paved parking lot would be restriped. The existing entrance would be retained. The scale and approximate location of signage for the development is shown on the illustration attached as Exhibit D. Phase 1 renovation costs are estimated at $350,000. If a special use permit is issued, work is expected to commence promptly. Phase 2 of the redevelopment would see a new two-story building constructed on the property, as located and shown on the concept plan. Like the first building, it would contain a total of 8 apartments, with four apartments on each floor. It is anticipated that all of the apartments in the Phase 2 building would be 2 -bedroom units, as illustrated on the floor plan attached as Exhibit E, A parking lot would be constructed to serve the Phase 2 building as shown on the concept plan. The architectural style of the Phase 2 building would complement the .Phase 1 building, but its exterior materials would not consist of block (as is the case with the Phase 1 building), but likely some combination of brick, hardie plank, and 1 vinyl siding. The existing entrance from McVitty Road would serve the Phase 2 building. The development of the Phase 2 building would commence after the Phase 1 building has been converted and leased. The apartments would be leased at market rates. While multi -family dwellings are permitted by right in the C-1 zoning district, that use is limited to no more than fifty (50%) percent of the gross floor area unless a special use permit is issued. The applicant is requesting the issuance of a special use permit allowing 100% of the gross floor area in both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildings to be developed for multi- family use. Given the continued demand for multi -family residences, the development of this small-scale complex furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance by providing attractive and efficient uses serving both the immediate community and county -wide needs. It also permits the redevelopment of a vacant building which has been the target of vandals, and the return of the property upon which it sits to a productive economic use. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Encouraging the redevelopment of currently unproductive property is an important element of the County's Community Plan, The Plan encourages such redevelopment to be compatible with adjacent land uses. Such is the case here, Although the future land use of the property is designated as neighborhood conservation, its immediate developed adjoiners along McVitty Road are designated as transition land uses. This proposed small- scale multi -family development provides a step-down in intensity from the C-2 adjoiners along McVitty Road and also represents a step-down in intensity from the previous child day care use. The 1.1 acres which is the subject of this application was never developed as single-family residential. In fact, single-family residential is absent in this stretch of McVitty Road. Single-family residential adjoiners along the rear of the parcel are provided a natural and substantial topographical buffer from the subject property. And all those residential adjoiners access their properties from Rasmont Road, not McVitty Road. 01 Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, road, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. No negative impacts are anticipated. To the contrary, returning the property to active and productive use will discourage the vandalism evident in the photographs, Compared to traffic generated by a child day care use, the potential traffic impact from up to 16 apartments will be less. 3 i®rv, /mm KA 'C H EAV A660CIATES 1°--Wtects, J)eslgners. Constructlori Managers -a- j u r �r 4x m _ �wK to I, �f L. orpr-, V16,1111 r �i RAY" CRAIGI-MAD, ARCMTRCT • 3536 BRAMBLUTON A3IEMl?, S.W. - ROANOKV, VA240N - (540) 7745326 EXHIBIT B KA - -'C 'HEAP lixchitecLS. i7es€finers CopsiMMOR Mmagers 6121F. yin RAYCIRMOTBRO, ARCkFLTBG£= 3536 9MLE UNAVEMM, 5.71 =ItOfNQr,U, VA24418 , 7154037174-5326 EXHIBIT C Project Notes comm.#gid Project: IWII ary (.t7llil-7' � �6'�- EXHIBIT D VA'GHEAD 4 ASSOCIATES Aml tWvts Dw2gnere. Cnustmct3oa MaWagers RAST CAAIQ�AD, AIiQMC'fa 3536 D AMBLBTON &MUk3, S.W. , R0A-&0KR VA 2AG18 , (544) 774-5326 EXHIBIT E CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT A PPLICA NTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. MCE OW CUPIED, LP By: G' June 12, 2020 Signature o app 'cant John G. eLeod, Managing Partner Date µGAN � F Community Development A Planning & zoning Division reg POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDDT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses; • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including; financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • when required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date; April 19, 2005 7 pOAlya� F Community Development z Planning & Zoning Division o f NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Nate: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 1-9,2005 MCE Owner Occupied, LLP Name of Petition PqEZ!5��l Petit,? er's Signat4re John G. McLeod, Managing Partner June 12, 2020 Date AH M AmlUteCts, Aesigners, Gansu' rUon Managers JL—1 , 17 . CONCEPT SITE PLAN FOR MCE OWNER OCCUPIED, LLP 3220 McVITTY ROAD r �J� IAO Tax 4 076.20-01-12,00-0000 1" = 40' rvkA-% RAV M -4101 -MAD, ARCHMECT • 3536 B AIABLETON AVENU1% SM • ROANOI{E, VA.2401 a • (54th) 774-5326 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OF MCE OWNER OCCUPIED, LLP TAX MAP PARCEL 076.20-01-12.00-0000 (ROANOKE COUNTY) TAX MAP N0. OWNERS /ADDRESS ZONING 076.20-01-10.00-0000 Commonwealth of Virginia no address on Roanoke Count GIS R1 076.20-01-10.01-0000 J. Jesus B. Arellano P. 0. Box 3 Daleville, Vir inia 24083 R1 076.20-01-09.00-0000 Kathryn B..(Tod) Conway 4727 Barclay Square, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 R1 076.20-01-08.00-0000 Thomas Alfred Miles 3279 Rasmont Road Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 R1 076.20-01-07.00-0000 James Little Jennifer Little 3285 Rasmont Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 R1 076.20-01-13.00-0000 No owner listed on Roanoke County GIS website C2 C1 "076.20-04-22.00-0000 William L. Proffitt, Jr. Linda H. Proffitt 5059 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 R1 *076.20-04-21.00-0000 Carl C. Rosen, Jr. Susan G. Rosen 5053 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 R1 `076.20-04-20.00-0000 William T. Stack Rosina Z. Stack 5047 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 R1 `076.20-04-19.00-0000 Damon S. Daniels R1 Ramona M. Daniels 5039 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Roanoke Vir inia 24018 076.20-04-15.00-0000 Roger L. Baumgardner R1 Carol S. Baumgardner 4903 Cave Spring Circle, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 *076.20-04-02.00-0000 Lanphear Family Trust Agreement R1 Judy A. Lanphear, Trustee 4909 Cave Spring Lane Roanoke, Virginia 24018 *076.20-04-03.00-0000 Lanphear Family Trust Agreement R1 Judy A. Lanphear, Trustee 4909 Cave Spring Lane Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 =3 c ® .. R GR ± y .. g 7 } 2 # 2 (1)> / m / / \\ / 0 0 \/ \ b e $ o\$ LUD �o \ U� 9� J § q o % / % / / g / / O a O .m 2 w O ® / @ \ / / IL . =3 D E 2 •\ ± y ?LO C\- % / / } 3fJ^ d2// Q w e e $ o\$ LO § § q o \ \ 2 =3 Nlr 1 ��I� d2 �I yQ -137VH HAZEL DR -S 0 0 a� Y 0 0 0 00 Q � IL � o N > > a) 0. U wQ U U O O O :�i U N c ~ O (Y) O O �O N O U E N —_ a) a) o 0 p S Q 0 -LN 0 0- r a) 6 r N XC,4 IL o 6 O O c: .N 0 _ N U U — L o 0 O O Coo O N IL C,4> U� � O CO O o O O c: .N 0 _ N U U — L o 0 O H o0 O _LO � .0 I21 O ' N Y Q 30 o U �J N� O(� Y N_ VI) �� � MMock Q) rY IA M U '= c\j� cl) M d• 03 LO co co N c\j L3 Mco N N (D d co 6ERFtY � o -A M Z `t N J -- 'cc Mco N co\ M N M\ ` c Ln \ ��1co M M co M ,i'-��(/ P, co 7Ci M1 1 CO N PJ o� M j co foo � �s M �0�� �� lS �°° tat C O N�m 1 �, 11 °' p�� O N mac,-) \ co CN O 4ee MND It �Mco � �� �cl) °°ab 9 pp c Al��-virZ �,� I Q�� 00 ♦ Mco �. ♦ M'� �� 'o 'D p N� OOZ£ 00. s J . M p N' h7� M N M N M iST'� N OZi4 M � CO O.� J��, N �CV� .�Ww LO o M O0� M � ;:7 M M �� M� �dco,°' -ON, MO -7� CD Qq M d Z 6i\ n n it o �, can �� o .� f A � CAVE b000 LO Lf) Ln CD 0 CD I(Lj 50 0,�, LO LP ,� of c 00 E 0 a Q U � > — _ O U C O) O m O Nt 00 O cc::)) U p Lo O m c 00 E 0 a Q U � > U O m O Nt O O cc::)) U p Lo O m c N � i J N N U O N N EO N 2 Q S N 0>> U ZN N O N D v) (D O i a Q N U Qr o �o �� �� o o �� 0 U� C �NOCL U)� > _° c (") 0 -o z u LL O ■ c 00 caop0 a 10 O N Q U � > U O m O Nt O O O O oq o p Lo O m U N � o � ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 The petition of Om Shree Hospitality, LLC to rezone approximately 9.99 acres from AG -1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the construction of a hotel/motel/motor lodge, located near the 2700 block of Wildwood Road and the 1700 block of Skyview Road, Catawba Magisterial District Philip Thompson Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for August 25, 2020. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Om Shree Hospitality, LLC to rezone approximately 9.99 acres from AG -1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the construction of a hotel/motel/motor lodge, located near the 2700 block of Wildwood Road and the 1700 block of Skyview Road, Catawba Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 25, 2020. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 2, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 Lumsden Associates, P.C. 20.0� ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS June 12, 2020 Ms. Rebecca James Zoning Administrator Roanoke County Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Om Shrec Hospitality, LLC — Rezoning Application Submittal Roanoke County Tax Parcels: 044.04-01-07.00 & 044.04-01-12.00 Lumsden Comm: 2020-064 Dear Ms. James: Please allow this letter to serve as our request for your office to accept the enclosed rezoning application for approval by the Roanoke County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The intent of the rezoning is to revise the associated (2) parcels from AG -1 zoning district to C-2 zoning district in order for the development of a proposed hotel use. The enclosed rezoning application package includes a documentation which describes the request in greater detail. Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the Rezoning Application Package, which include the following items: • Completed Application for Rezoning • Rezoning Justification • Concept Plan and associated Concept Plan Checklist (Exhibit A) • Metes and Bounds Description for the associated properties (Exhibit B) • Water and Sewer Availability Application Request (Exhibit C) • List of Adjoining Property Owners (Exhibit D) • Traffic Impact Analysis for Entrance Analysis (Exhibit E) • Rezoning Fee by Check: ($945 + $32 x 10 acres) x 3% Technology Fee = $1,302.95 Also, included with this submittal is a CD containing the Rezoning Application Package in PDF format. Should you have any questions or concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call or email. Sincerely, LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. Andrew P. Lumsden, P.E. Director of Engineering Copy to: Mr. Amit Patel, Om Shree Hospitality, LLC 4664 Brambleton Avenue I R O. Box 20669 1 Roanoke, VA 240181 Phone (540) 774-4411 I Fax (540) 772-9445 1 www.lumsdenpc.com County of Roanoke fl� 0 A 4 Community Development G Planning & Zoning z 5204 Bernard Drive $3tt P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 z -A00 03 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/BZA da : Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number x ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: O. 5hr-c<-- LLC Work: 10 10 L.,We- Apple, Dave Cell #: 5•F - S/ - l S' fi >7aK �o h VA Z N1 y f Fax No.: g5i5' - Tm A X 7o Af Owner's name/address w/zip Phone 5s-(. -Ssne 3, -- nMot ica Sr. Work: 2611 CryS+al 3p v,Jr,2s Ave, -6•w1 Fax No. #: (?oana6,, vA Z-qa l f Property. Lgcation C)W'�a�w6,C/ Roam r Magisterial District: tQ�✓bQ CommmnityPlannittgarea: 5yvs��. �oQr� Tax Map No.: 012/.0 - of - a?,00 -600-=- 6oOy 0 qAq-O 17, 00 -00©0 Existing Zoning: Ai�-i I3r4k Rtlr-e`S Size of parcel(s): Acres: (¢. 6 y A'c Existing Land Use: Yl1p 1-V e o REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2 --2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/SIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: C — Z Proposed Land Use: Does the parcel meet the minimtun lot area, width, and Frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes P( No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Aiticle IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE I5 REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes C' No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning O ee in o r to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to ,. Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordina ��K 2 2016 Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BEA NY OFT E ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. wsnv/ r v/AA rus/w/ P v/A�, R/SAV/ P V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description A/ [j Proffers, if applicable 7MJustification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners 1 hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prop rty or ie owner's a t r contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-22.32) REVIEW REQUESTS. . Applicant Om Shree Hospitality, LLC Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Orn Shree Hospitality proposes the development of a Hotel business on the subject properties. The location is ideal to serve the those travelling on Interstate 81, particularly those visiting or working in both the Roanoke and New River Valleys. The subject parcels are positioned between an existing Industrially -zoned parcel, which is the site of an inactive quarry, and the commercial uses along US Route 11/460, West Main Street. The proposed building site is approximately I ,000 feet from an existing hotel use in Roanoke County, approximately 700 feet from an existing hotel and approximately 450 feet from a hotel currently under construction, both in the City of Salem. The location of the subject parcels near the Interstate 81 Exit 137 interchange is consistent with the C-2 Zoning District's goal of encouraging commercial development in proximity to major arterial thoroughfares, and the parcels are designated as "Core" Future Land Use. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Glenvar Community Plan identifies the subject parcels as "Core" Future Land Use for commercial and industrial development and use, as are all but one adjoinder, which is identified as "Rural Preserve" (RP). The topography of the subject parcels and the limited developable envelope within the site will provide significant and effective buffering of the RP adjoinder. Rezoning these parcels to the C-2 Zoning District will allow for commercial growth as envisioned by the Community Plan, and the proposed Hotel use is equally consistent with both the Community Plan "Core" designation and County goals for growth in the area. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The topography of the site presents a challenge to commercial development of the site, but the Developer has envisioned an approach that takes advantage of that topography as well. By elevating the building pad, the facility will be visible to travelers on Interstate 81, while minimizing to the extent possible the visual impact on the existing residential uses adjacent to the site. Under the scenario envisioned, there will be more than 350 feet of separation of the development area from the RP Future Land Use parcel. Approximately 4.4 acres of the combined parcels will remain undeveloped due to steep topography and difficult access. There is no expectation that the proposed use or the C-2 District rezoning would have a deleterious effect on the public services and facilities of the area. The hotel use would place no new demands on County schools, nor is it expected to place a burden on local parks and recreation facilities. The site and use should not require any special or unusual service by fire and rescue, and access to the site for those service vehicles has been a primary consideration in the site evaluation. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. . Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adj scent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL IISE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicants Date OAM k G 2 � Community Development Planning & Zoning Division A fi9 POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day .Effective date: April 19, 2005 7 A Community Development z Planning & Zoning Division 1 30 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion. of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note; a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitatefurther study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date. Apr11 99, 2005 Si 1 R t L Ros n r,TT11 1,Ty ILC Name of Petition � . —4-0-C P Petne s S nature 0(' ! 2-1&e) P at� EXHIBIT "A" CONCEPT PLAN zuuo;+-piuz-aiag -concept n rryr rllrr rrr'1i,� SITE AND ZONING TABULATIONS EXHIBIT' A1 TAX MAP ID: 044.04-01-1200-0000 AND 044.04-01-07.00-0000 CURRENT ZONING: AG -1 - OVERLAY DISTRICTS: GLENVAR COMMUNITY PLAN �. IIS°!Ii��17I�JJl✓ �f/// ; e -- - EXISTING USE: UNDEVELOPEDr p i nl 11 ! lrrrrrj /'✓/f! SITE ACREAGE 3.95 ACRES AND 6.04 ACRES (DEEDED) PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: C-2 MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUIRED: 15,000 S.F. (WITH PUBLIC SEWER da WATER) MINIMUM FRONTAGE REQUIRED: 75' (WITH PUBLIC SEWER & WATER) SI >✓ r rrr/i �I% {II� °I 111+��I1 \ yyl�`' - _ f!/� y MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED: UNLIMITED (NOT ADJACENT TO R-1 OR R-2 ZONING DISTRICT) MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: 50X- MAAMUM LOT COVERAGE: 90% r i mfr PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 4.37X (0.4362 ACRES) TAX, ID 044,04-D1 01. f i PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 20.69X 2.0666 ACRES J I VIII 14��1 i11�4 4� \\ ICANE DANNY & SONJA� 1 ( ) - J, I `IOW }11111 y4ly+ }} I QNING Si IICT AG REQUIRED PARKING SPACES: HOTEL/MOTEL/MOTOR LODGE llll�lW}I }4�y�'rtl�ylll�}l } �` SITE TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 1 SPACE PER GUEST ACCOMMODATION PLUS SPACES i}�11\���� �" r AS REQUIRED FOR OTHER USES SITE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 103 SPACES(*) *THREE ILLUSTRATED SPACES WILL BECOME ACCESSIBLE SPACE AISLES 11y : \vC e "Y%akar ��`�- )7) 7 1 i,'�' I+'rl✓1 'Jl �% / �� }���}t61�tit�11114}t�4 \ `��fl �� ��� RETA>N�iG IYALL 11 �r I � Y 1\l 1`}II I I II r j ,err � r rltlrnryil r �f f i� r � 1 1��_ - - l�ll_�D ,�, ri7rjrl�///r„ /✓/j//, >� ,/ / r 1 1 /f/r \ T D: 04-01-12,00Iq ??dn�� \.� ` J r ! / ✓/ r / 1 Z \ > \ \\ ���; `\ STo�uwAr;, f1q'r!'rllJ;lr rJr Ir p' III IfI r I i i I+ � II /���f>l/l!f�llliri�li >.✓` I / !rl I l it l i I I l J I � ' =�',�� �li)) l� 11 I�� 1 l .-� � ✓ _ � AREA �i r � r I i ill I 111 III III f + ��� ¢ly .! • i � v V; full. T �D' 044.04-T-01. - i R. ,y1�111y411j1 F05TER LI1KE PROPOSED }M;�rrr�lrfla HOTEL. lrxu' =YNSMAS6, AMBER AL/ r'illie1+lull UNDISTLIM AREA 1Ir'f'lrh(Iri�r APPROX. 4.4 AC ��J rrtilrr4 v ,1avA i 1� �, ✓� -ter �� R IO oda D4—rn-D1.00 r --'J I- DANNY g 50NJA TAX ID 044.04 01 OIi.00 ONING DISTR1GTrAG-1_ • NORFORO JENNIFER TAX ID: 044.04-01-07.00 ii}'�i ' } CpAR5LEYr DWJETTE \� , _ 1 � �\� w�A• ` ��rr±E / »\g \ ONING DISTRICT: AG-1��j�'�.c�1111 I ♦♦ �\ \ ly _ I 111 I I +ll Louv ��- v��IlV��ti�ti��%�� I I�wll�r 'T" 044.04 * \`•\�\ GflNS1RlICTION.-- (� \. 1 \1 1y uyl�y \� /---i'/�/. %J 11++'l 'illy' �LX'404 01— i ilrf1 I I I � rjr \`\r / f„fjDRFOD JENiF�7i`/, f I I `111y1+r j l t \ G \ o �—� Ja, %/' f�✓/r LUNINUyb)RIILT" AG-' r, r I}i III} !I / 4•L y�l �. I��I _��� 1��.���• r ��J 111��d ��r � 'ti, ��A� — �_—�A 200' 0 200' SCALE: 1' _ 200' DATE: June 11, 2020 SCALE: Lumsden Associates, P.C. 1+' = 200' ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS COMM. NO.: 20-064 4664 BRAMBLETON AVENUE PHONE: (540) 774-4411 P.O. BOX 20669 FAX: (540) 772-9445 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 WWW.LUMSDENPC.COM e: \lapc\autocad\drawi ngs\2020`,2020-064\O1-cad\OI -en gineering\01-pre li mi nary\20064-pl02-bldg.dwg EXHIBIT "B' METES & BOUNDS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "B" Metes and bounds description of Properties being Rezoned: The following is a metes and bounds description of Roanoke County Tax Parcels 044.04-01-07.00 and 044.04-01-12.00. This description is based on the outer deed lines of said parcels as described within Deed dated July 26th, 2015 within the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia as Instrument No. 201506693. BEGINNING at an iron pin set in the easterly right of way line of Skyview Road, said point being the southwesternmost corner of the hereinafter described parcel; thence N 80° 11' 25" W, 34.91 feet to a point; N 410 41' 25" W, 143.89 feet to an iron pin; thence N 35° 18' 20" W passing a highway monument at 16.45 feet, and a total distance of 134.75 feet to a point; thence N 360 29' 20" W, 59.76 feet to an iron pin; thence N 36' 29' 25" W, 545.51 feet to an old pipe; thence S 39' 38'00" W, 187.11 feet to an iron pin; thence N 290 23' 20" W, 208.36 feet to an iron pin; thence N 60' 36'40" E, 177.23 feet to an iron pin; thence S 68' 01' 10" E, 725.60 feet to an iron pin; thence N 790 12' 00" E, 480.00 feet to an old pipe; thence S 07* 01' 00" E, 182.00 feet to an iron pin; thence S 480 23'00" W, 710.90 feet to an iron pin, being the place of beginning, consisting of 10.001 acres (435,644 square feet). EXHIBIT "C" WATER & SEWER AVAILABILITY APPLICATION Zimbra *NEW SUBMISSION* Availability Application From : Western Virginia Water Authority <webmaster@westernvawater.org> Sender :webmaster@westernvawater.org Subject : *NEW SUBMISSION* Availability Application To : alumsden@lumsdenpc.com Availability Application Submission #: 357846 IP Address: 174.79.8.177 Submission Date: 06/11/2020 2:46 PM Survey Time: 6 minutes, 25 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "** "" are marked as sensitive and can be viewed after you login. Property Owner's Information (required information) Date 06/11/2020 12:00 AM Property Owner's Name Fletcher Smoak, Jr. Property Address 0 Skyview Road Roanoke CountyVirginia24153 Tax Map Number 044.04-01-07.00-0000 Owner's Phone Number (540) 815-1345 Owner's Email amit.puja@gmail.com Services Requested Water and Sewer Service Type of Property Commercial Residential Comments (optional): Rezoning for Potential Hotel Development. Information for Property Owner's Representative alumsden@lumsdenpc.com EXHIBIT "C" Thu, .dun 11, 2020 02:46 PM If this form is being completed by a representative for the property owner, please fill out the information below. Representative's Name Andrew Lumsden Representative's Address 4664 Brambleton Avenue RoanokeVirginia24018 Representative's Email Address alumsden@lumsdenpc.com Representative's Phone Number (540) 774-4411 ext. 114 Commercial Property Information Additional forms and plans may be required. A representative of the Water Autority will be in touch with you. Comments (optional): Rezoning for Potential Hotel Development. Please attach any documents you need to share below. Attachment 20054-PL02-BLDGCONCEPT2-Asheet. PDF Attachment 20064-PL02-BLDG-Concept2-D-05.18.2020.pdf Attachment Thank you, Western Virginia Water Authority This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management SystemT". Please do not reply directly to this email. EXHIBIT r r D " ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION EXHIBIT "D" ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Roanoke County Tax Parcels: 044.04-01-01.00-0000 044.04-01-06.00-0000 044.04-01-08.00-0000 044.04-01-09.00-0000 044.04-01-10.00-0000 044.04-01-13.00-0000 044.04-02-35.00-0000 044.04-02-37.05-0000 (ROANOKE COUNTY PARCELS) TAX MAP No. OWNER(S) / ADDRESS ZONING 044.04-01-01.00-0000 Danny R. Kane & AGI Sonja S. Kane 723 Skycoe Drive Salem, VA 24153 044.04-01-06.00-0000 Jennifer Norford AGI 1723 Skyview Road Salem, VA 24153 044.04 -OI -08.00-0000 Jennifer Norford & AG1 Danette Parsley 2782 Wildwood Road Salem, VA 24153 044.04-01-09.00-0000 Monumental Corporation AGI C/O Wilkinson Companies Inc 106 Commerce Street, Suite 110 Lake Mary, FL 32746 044.04-01-10.00-0000 Luke Philip Foster & AGI Amber Nicole Zinsmaster 2768 Wildwood Road Salem, VA 24153 044.04-01-13.00-0000 Sonabank 11 Attn: Accounts Payable P.O. Box 6030 Glen Allen, VA 23058 044.04-02-35.00-0000 Jullian P. King & AGI Jeanie W. King 2715 Brogan Lane Salem, VA 24153 044.04-02-37.05-0000 Dev Om LLC AGI 112 West Main Street, Suite 212 Salem, VA 24153 (CITY OF SALEM PARCELS) TAX MAP No. OWNER(S) / ADDRESS ZONING 94-1-4 Dev Om LLC HBD 112 West Main Street, Suite 212 Salem, VA 24153 EXHIBIT "E" TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT "E" TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CONCEPTUAL HOTEL LAYOUT LOCATED ON TAX PARCEL NO. 044.04-01-12.00 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PREPARED FOR OM S HREE HOSPITALITY, LLC DATE: June 11, 2020 COMM. #2020-064 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Proposed Entrance Analysis for Conceptual Hotel Layout Roanoke County Tax Parcel 044.04-01-12.00 Background Om Shree Hospitality, LLC (developer) is proposing a rezoning for the development of a hotel within Roanoke County Tax Parcels 044.04-01-12.00 and 044.04-01-07.00. This potential entrance is located along Wildwood Road (Rte. 619 —35 mph speed limit) immediately north of Skyview Road and Litchell Road. The proposed hotel development is intended to have approximately 65 rooms and lay on a 16,000 s.f. footprint. Additional improvements include private access drive, parking, utility extensions, drainage improvements and stormwater management. This portion of Wildwood Road (Rte. 619) is considered a major collector and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Proposed Entrance Location Analysis Based on the proposed location of the potential entrance, no adjacent commercial entrances exist on the proposed development's side of Wildwood Road. The closest adjacent entrances/intersections being a vacant quarry entrance to the north (approximately 870 feet of separation) and the intersection with Skyview Road (approximately 820 feet of separation) to the south. This proposed entrance does not anticipate the need for an exception/variance to VDOT's Access Management Regulations. The potential entrance will request the use of a Full Access Commercial Entrance and will utilize the design guidelines/requirements within VDOT Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections (Appendix F). These guidelines will be utilized for site distance verification as well. f=igure 4-9 of Appendix F is the anticipated entrance configuration for this commercial entrance along a highway with shoulders. Crash History A review of available crash data (TREDS) for the most recent years of 2019-2020 show no crashes in the immediate vicinity of the proposed entrance or in any Immediate direction north or south along Wildwood Road. Documentation of these findings is include following this narrative section. Conclusions On the following pages are the trip generation volumes for the referenced hotel use along with the design charts for the left and right turn warrants. We have included trip generation volumes for both the peak hour of the proposed hotel and the peak hour of the adjacent street. Please also note that the left turn warrant chart utilized provides for a left turn percentage of 20f, whereas the left turn volume percentages for the proposed entrance ranges from 16.3% to 20.6%. Based on all of this Information and the minimal crash history for the area, in our opinion, neither a left or right turn lane would be warranted during either the AM or PM peak hours. Existing Traffic Counts for Wildwood Road (2018 VDOT Daily Traffic Volume, Estimates) Average Annual Weekday Traffic (AADT) - 910 vehicles per day Estimate of Peak Hour Percentage (K) Estimate of Peak Direction Volume (Dir, Factor) Existing Wildwood Road Peak Hour Traffic Volume Peak Direction Volume Off -Peak Direction Volume 0.125 = 0.742 = 114 vehicles per hour 85 vehicles per hour = 29 vehicles per hour Trip Generation Information (ITE Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition) -„Using larger of average rate vs, equation Proposed Entrance Volumes Calculated Hotel (310) Rates versus 65 Proposed Total Rooms: AM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) = 40 vehicles per Plot (59% enter, 41% exit) Entrance Split = 24 vehicles (18 from peak direction, 6 from off-peak direction) Exit Split =16 vehicles (12 to peak direction, 4 to off-peak direction) PM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) = 45 vehicles per Plot (51% enter, 49% exit) Entrance Split = 23 vehicles (17 from peak direction, 6 from off-peak direction) Exit Split = 22 vehicles (16 to peak direction, 6 to off-peak direction) AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(65) + 0.12 => 39 vehicles (54% enter, 46% exit) Entrance Split = 21 vehicles (16 from peak direction, 5 from off-peak direction) Exit Split =18 vehicles (13 to peak direction, 5 to off-peak direction) PM Peak Hour = 45 vehicles per Plot (58% enter, 42% exit) Entrance Split = 26 vehicles (19 from peak direction, 7 from off-peak direction) Exit Split = 19 vehicles (14 to peak direction, 5 to off-peak direction) Left Turning Movement Volumes Proposed Entrance AM Peak Hour Advancing Volume = 98 vehicles Left Turn Movements = 16 vehicles (16.3%) Opposing Volume = 34 vehicles PM Peak Hour Advancing Volume = 34 vehicles Left Turn Movements = 7 vehicles (20,69) Opposing Volume = 108 vehicles Right Turning Movement Volumes Proposed Entrance AM Peak Hour Approaching Volume = 34 vehicles Right Turns = 5 vehicles PM Peak Hour Approaching Volume =108 vehicles Right Turns = 23 vehicles AM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) Advancing Volume = 97 vehicles Left Turn Movements =18 vehicles (18.6%) Opposing Volume = 35 vehicles PM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) Advancing Volume = 35 vehicles Left Turn Movements = 6 vehicles (17.1%) Opposing Volume = 102 vehicles AM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) Approaching Volume = 35 vehicles Right Turns = 6 vehicles PM Peak Hour (Adjacent Street) Approaching Volume =102 vehicles Right Turns = 17 vehicles 00 0 r i i1 is— a) a) V s N W s V/ v/ C .y v C L L CD E E O V a Lo ao mo q4n in ro �v 60 5m 4m� �>,�6cc �� w�o riga C� c 2 c wn�.c own' t m w caw chi mu L�a'Q 41 m m �' E.25 v m VOL) wwwa� w�C N�� UIIi N N rMC 'bAt'�wr.Aa a @µ0 ... ww v� a c wgo9a>J3w`ac 'a,"c nuc° nit �4 tL U.. C^l 0 Uryryw���'�"..^^S�S11 8 � ' n„1 7 �.'� ��T"�'i{a'�� e.�/N� t6 N ML L V� w(J aL ��� T3 o �awC w�(� �� w g ao c� m a �a�' m.�� 4�8 0,'0,C n c g ci q1 � c c� a ii�c', ro „� p 0 c wa 3 � � CL qy;5 G! .� CL ++` 4Y n'NN*+' U,C o N C �r w w W w� 9 fl. tnC% wagtuo L unit 71A4YQ1CNCc ` coom' w ?zs j UNC a w� a �� MOD n �i Aw a ao tip° $�9m CLC we w� wc� mao.Nj Rog 002 N Ii) T1 W62 C� pp © 14 4_ C w+ tlldN fgQ1q Uji4 r NDN «flwV(7V M t7 �E0) nWQE 0)0? i44 aoa nuc o 0 Va $' my W �k k �i7 b E' 0'5 c� c Q U u_ (D Z V c 0 c a o w c m,6 $. w co -5. ar Z wn W (D old '00 l c0 'k V1 Z�� rc VJ Nt W� w WZ 4��� — ,�, d :ulN Z c7 ua z c, W U Z -3512 wF � ° � d g z� °E w- Z n "I ° 4 LU E W I — •� co q oz U. U0 xu W D 2 co) H V Z 0 a U) rZ yr W W �QZ hl� I -- Z W J U W V 0) d' W 0 U cu C 81 N O 3a �Q W O N N � W U U m .C: �C: Q L O 0-0 E a U°O 2{} L ..� o �m 0 0 o L N c U� Co (4 C �E �U 4 O z 29+4 = 33 �- 29+5 = 34 85+18 = 103 85+16 = 101 �- AWAY FROM 1-81 / SALEM 85+16 = 101 85+14 = 99 29+6 = 35 29+7 = 36 PROPOSED ENTRANCE 18 16 29+6 = 35 29+5 = 34 85+12 = 97 85+13 = 98 AM PEAK HOUR 6 7 PROPOSED ENTRANCE 85+17 = 102 �- 85+23 = 108 29+6 = 35 29+5 = 34 TO 1-81 / SALEM - AWAY FROM 1-81 / SALEM PM PEAK HOUR TO 1-81 / SALEM --� RED NUMBERS REPRESENT PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET BLACK NUMBERS REPRESENT PEAK HOUR OF GENERATOR PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM (U 0 O O C D t) 0 (A O > SIS m i C y O Oa) FL S w < CU E � ~ O W O.S mm CV (V Z5 � E c ��5 CF O CO cC rota U� CD �r- ro � ro C ~ > a o CC C c 4 U C7 FO N A 0 0 ti LL m 0 V 0 LL 0 U Q a 0 Q C7 0 0 co Q1 z C7 v � � O o z 0 1 �o Q Cp cc O cr 0 U LL 0 O O N u7 0 LL V co 0 0 LL 0 Q a 4 a Q 0 4 0 U LL v � C O { Q ] N i ] d 0 E 6 CJ 0 O O Ir cc � ¢ U'D a 3: C z z U 0 N a) Q U') N r C® N u7 � r• 0 0 LL LL LL W N C) o � 0 0 `D z z 0 0 C) Q 0 0-0 O C7 o Q r o C) o 0 0 O O LA CA z Z o C� a = 3 h CD r IA c 0 O Cl? 0 O 0 C C C 7JL €U U U < � � � 0 c 00 co co CE ¢ 00: 0 0 � i-lF CL N i m N O C E O U d 0 cu Er LL LL LL C? 0 co0 n a m C7 CLO LO Lo m Ln Q 0 Ci LL LL LL m O m 0 0 0 0 0 U LL U 6 0 C] 0 Q 0 0 0 co co O 0 O N N r 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 O O O m rn rn LL LL LL Q u o a z o c n Q 0 co Ci O O Y mCt5 O F O ~ O cr C 0 o a U U U LL 0 0 C) CO m O LL co 0 0 U Q 0 O a 0 O C)) LL l " . O e O ' � C CO CR O cu'0 cuC a 0 Ir 0 U LL Q 0 Q Q r LO O LL Lo Ci) 0 0 LL O C7 0 N O 0 0 O of LL F i 3 p R Q e T C U 0 0 C cu0 cc LL 0 Q 0 r N c-) u7 0 LL a) 0 0 U C7 CN O 0 0 0 m LL i O ' � S i ) T � �o 0 ) EDs 0 C m m cc C O LL 0 C) m m on u7 O LL CO a) Q 0 LL C� CN O 0 0 O CD LL C C 9 O ' c ) � C ) 3 � 3 � i 3 L F m s C 0 Ir cc C D 76 C C6 DIDIDD WARRANT FOR LEFT -TURN STORAGE LANES ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAY = 700 tl v W 600 J 500 0 (D 400 z U) 300 0 a_ 0 200 0 100 800 = 700 w 600 500 0 > 4.00 0 z Q 300 200 0 inn, Peak & Peak Adj 'Street Peak & Peak Adi Street ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ MEMEMEMEMEM MMMMMMMMMMM ■■■■■■■■■M■ t ■■■■■■■■■■■ NONE U 200 400 600 800 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME (VPH) FIGURE 3-7 At -Grade, Unsignalized Intersections L = % Left Turns in VA S = Storage Length Required V = 40 mph (Design Speed) L-20% ■■!■■■■■■■■■\■■■■■■i MEMOS !■ i. �I ■■■■■■■■■■momma■■■■ ■■■■■�■ NNNISAAM E1+■■ll■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E\■■■■■i\■■■■\ ■IJ■0Him ■E■■NONE ■■■■ MEMO MEMO MEMO MEMO M■■■■■OEI 1 II 4I/ .11 :11 1000 VA ADVANCING VOLUME F-63 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 PHV APPROACH TOTAL, VEHICLES PER HOUR Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total C 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow (Vote: An average of 11 % for K x D will suffice. When right turn facilities are warranted, see Figure 3-1 for design criteria.' FIGURE 3-26 WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2 -LANE HIGHWAY) Rev. 1115 Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 29 Average Number of Rooms: 204 Directional Distribution: 59% entering, 41 % exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.53 0,20 - 1.03 0.76 uata Piot and twation z 0 500 400 300 200 100 0 X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X XX X -- - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .......... ............. ............ X X -K X< X X X X 0 100 200 X - Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given Trip Generation, 9th Edition o Institute of Transportation Engineers 300 400 ------ Average Rate R2 = .... 500 Ti I I= Hotel (31 0) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms R6Gm On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 33 Average dumber of Rooms: 200 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 491% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.60 0.21 - 1.06 0.81 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 U) C LU Q 300 _U N C) l� 200 e� 100 0 x x ; - -- --- -- ----------------- ---------- .................. i x x x , x X x-X' X ------------1 ........ :............. Xx ' x X X 0 100 200 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 300 400 500 ------ Average Rate R2**. Trip Generation, 9th Edition o Institute of Transportation Engineers 615 Hotel �310� Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms �R�asJ On a: Weekday, Q.M. Peak dour of Generator Number of Studies: 34 Average Number of Rooms: 279 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 45% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.52 0.16 - 1.42 0.75 Data Plot and Equation Lo W Q N U -G Cll v 0) T Q a 400 300 200 100 0 0 X ;X X X X X ....... ..... ------ X X X; X X X. X" X , -X X---- -,-fes--- ----- ------- X -- -- ... ;.... X 'X , XX X . , X X 100 200 300 X = Number of Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(x) + 0.12 Trip Generation, 9th Edition + institute of Transportation Engineers 400 500 ______ Average Rate R2 = 0.56 600 Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 35 Average Number of Rooms: 294 Directional Distribution: 58% entering, 42% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.61 0.20 - 1,23 0.81 Data Plot and Equation 000 500 400 U.1 !L 4? _U 300 n 12 (D 200 100 E) 0 0 100 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given 200 300 X = Number of Rooms X 400 500 ------ Average Rate R2 = ...� X 600 1 Trip Generation, 9th Edition 9 Institute of Transportation Engineers 2020 T Roanoke CountyTA^ All Crashes V woo6006 RO�.�.�..= TJ Roanoke Gurudwara y _ r � — Intersecting Street -- Mry °Y �jaW b Cole Hallow V 6� 5!9 �nwrr L6 O g`. O SY Gum Springs Church a 4-� Coln sP fin �sF 4 9 yr e W j?oh KE, � arvG1E f3+ssl bt9 ybalord c, aat a Hard Johnsoii by 0r►r Wylidilam SAIII Holel.. r t El - exas �`olio�v Rd Hansplori ]nn Salem �i � �, a n'r'n�q a d Ra � tib � SkY•''� R j b� law I? p�tlT3 �� KiSka Pa r F• SIUFbVE� Lbs, STOP iH BPx Md.— TI. crashes dlspfgy d on the —il are Daly Those wA,h have v,I,d,L,d GPS in —anon Google RMarj dada .RDYC 2059 Roanoke County 1111 Craspes WLD*OD RD r — Intersecting Street -- I I 619 .8tap6i+ln._ t � 0 6o 009 To_ o„ `s 15-1 �kYFTpiv Hampton Inn SaILm �o S�hreiv a� P He $ky'� 4� y Rd Ile tY ylc STOP IN 0p x . Disciaimer. The crashes displayed no the map are only chase +vhi,,h haveuandased GPS Mf --ion Gco�:gle ft6ylaP, damlr"QfiH0 Rra93°r•'� sem° g��ya t � 0 6o 009 To_ o„ `s 15-1 �kYFTpiv Hampton Inn SaILm �o S�hreiv a� P He $ky'� 4� y Rd Ile tY ylc STOP IN 0p x . Disciaimer. The crashes displayed no the map are only chase +vhi,,h haveuandased GPS Mf --ion Gco�:gle ft6ylaP, damlr"QfiH0 I T m■ f{f 2 {o 4 AM I T m■ � * o 0 - O CSU oo � W Q N Q 0 0 0 O� U U OO .� 0= J •� O E 0 0 - N N p O N O N O N Z N cn P-4 O O H N Q-O p > > C'0) C V) Q � � _ u _ C I . . o o w U N N LU Ilf O * o 0 - N 0 X �. 11 p C0 TTSS11 V/ z V c r O IL 00 0 'O o_ _ O o C Cil N N N Ilf O 0 M C o li■ ■ 0 0 ^N` W. N O 0 C) N CD CD CD U .. � cu C 0 cc::)) O U U J E 0 0 N J p= O N c O N �oN Z V) c� N 3 N 3 U p p i > >� > Y NtN O O ' 9 �q C p p U S t LU I o o w U 9 � o 'o 0 o 0 _ € Uo o ❑ r N C) j 0 tll C3 L N N CD y CY v" r iJ LW U O OWW ■ T .*err 3 t o 0. 32 i tip��ly�,a }.T 1n cr V 1 CIO n a W�'` ^N` W. N O 0 C� UCD CD CD CD U .. W �^ 0 cc::)) O U U J E 0 0 N J p= O N c O N �oN Z V) c� N 3 N p VO O p p > >� > p NtN O O ' 9 p p U LU I o o w U W. N O © LLo O TTSS •c c � m o c } 2 9 p U IL 9 � o 'o 0 o 0 _ € Uo o ❑ r N C) j 0 tll C3 L N N o N y CY U0 /� Z r iJ 0 O ■ ■ O � o 0. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: July 28, 2020 Ordinance approving dissolution of a lease with Johnson & Elich Roasters, d/b/a Mill Mountain Coffee at South County Library, located at 6303 Merriman Road, Roanoke, Virginia, Cave Spring Magisterial District Rob Light Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Approval to execute a mutually agreed upon early lease termination agreement for County owned space at the South County Library with Johnson & Elich Roasters, LTD dba Mill Mountain Coffee and Tea. BACKGROUND: The County leases approximately 895 square feet at the South County Library to Johnson & Elich Roasters, LTD dba Mill Mountain Coffee and Tea. The lease includes a drive-through lane and service window. The lease term expires November 30, 2020. The County plans to utilize the space as a satellite location for the County Treasurer's Department that will provide drive-through service. County staff and the tenant have negotiated a mutually agreed upon early lease termination date of August 24, 2020, to allow for the timely reconfiguration of this space for County needs. The Mill Mountain Coffee and Tea location at the South County Library is currently closed due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. DISCUSSION: Identifying and establishing a satellite drive-through location for the Treasurer is a County priority as identified in the June 28, 2020 Board of Supervisors Work Session for Page 1 of 2 the use of Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020 funding. FISCAL IMPACT: The average annual revenue received by the County for fiscal years 2018 and 2019 is $5,885.85 per year. However, the County maintains the interior and exterior of the lease space and provides all utilities and trash removal. The net income for the lease space is minimal. The County will pay the tenant $2,000 for the expedited lease termination and removal of equipment, and will remit the tenant's initial $1,000 lease deposit as specified in the lease agreement. Funding for the expedited lease termination and all design and construction costs associated with space reconfiguration is available from CARES Act funding already appropriated and planned for this purpose. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance and waiving a second reading by a 4/5 vote pursuant to section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Code. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 ORDINANCE APPROVING DISSOLUTION OF A LEASE WITH JOHNSON & ELICH ROASTERS, d/b/a MILL MOUNTAIN COFFEE AT SOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY, LOCATED AT 6303 MERRIMAN ROAD, ROANOKE, VA WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke currently is the lessor of 895 square feet of space on the first floor of the South County Library that is leased by Johnson & Elich Roasters, d/b/a Mill Mountain Coffee ("Lessee"), for use as a coffee shop for library patrons; and WHEREAS, this lease is for a period of three years commencing December 1, 2011 and terminating November 30, 2014, with options to renew for two additional three-year terms; and WHEREAS, Lessee had exercised the option to renew the lease; and WHEREAS, Lessee closed its facility at the outset of COVID-19, in accord with the Governor's Executive Orders 53 and 55; and WHEREAS, in the interest of public safety and social distancing, County has devised a plan to utilize Lessee's leased space, including a drive-through service window as an alternative for County taxpayers to remit taxes and other fees to the County Treasurer; and WHEREAS, Lessee has agreed to vacate the premises and terminate the lease effective August 24, 2020, notwithstanding the expiration date of November 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 2020; and the second reading has been dispensed with, upon an affirmative vote of 4/5ths of the Page 1 of 2 members of the Board, this being deemed to be an emergency measure pursuant to Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.03 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the County is authorized to acquire property, including the lease of real estate; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real estate shall be accomplished by ordinance. 3. That the existing lease of 895 square feet on the first floor of the South County Library at 6303 Merriman Road, between the County and Johnson & Elich Roasters, d/b/a Mill Mountain Coffee is hereby dissolved and terminated. 4. That as consideration of Lessee's agreement to vacate the leased space and dissolve the lease, County shall return Lessee's full security deposit. 5. That Lessee will execute a hold harmless agreement to memorialize its willingness to terminate and dissolve the lease effective July 28, 2020. 6. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is authorized to execute this lease on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Ordinance accepting and appropriating grant funds in the amount of $64,375 from the Washington/Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit Howard B. Hall Chief of Police Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $64,375 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit BACKGROUND: The HIDTA funds were provided to the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit to identify drug trafficking organizations and, when possible, to prosecute the cases as drug trafficking conspiracies. Roanoke County Police Department serves as the lead agency and the Roanoke County Department of Finance and Management Services serves as the fiscal agent. DISCUSSION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit received a commitment of funding from HIDTA in the amount of $64,375 for the 2020 calendar year. These funds will be used to continue to support investigations of drug trafficking organizations that are operating in the greater Roanoke Valley. The first reading of the ordinance occurred on June 9, 2020 and on that date was Page 1 of 2 placed on the consent agenda. We have since realized a second reading is necessary, so the second reading will be held on July 28, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: No matching funds are required by the County. The grant is one hundred percent (100%) federal funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $64,375 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit. Page 2 of 2 Recipient Obligation Form "*All Information MUST be Provided" T - AGENCY: Roanoke Police Department Agency Tax ID: 5 4 _ &,o a is -,a Program: Washington/Baltimore HIDTA : Agency DUNS: OG - a 3 S - 3 (c 10 Performance Period: January 1, 2020 -December 31, 2020 Duration: 12 months Authorized Amount: $ 67,500.00 'Grant Number: G20WB0o04A, 2020 HIDTA FUNDS,' Recipient Point of Contact: St rrv£n (Print Name) s sho A- aroan&EcourhtVa.50V (Email) 99 a5 CoyQ Rout) RonnokE . VA a4019 (Address) Type of Entity (Circle): Non-profit/educational/or government Commercial/For Profit Provide a copy of your Overtime Policy and Hourly/Differential Rates. Agency acknowledges receipt of Washington/Baltimore HIDTA directives and I Agreement? Initial: The appropriate programmatic and administrative personnel involved in this application are aware of applicable sponsor guidelines and pc and are prepared to enter into a recipient agreement consistent with the applicable flow -down requirements. I hereby certify that neither recipient listed above, nor its principals, are presently disbarred, suspended, proposed for disbarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any U.S. Federal department or agency. To the best of my knowledge, the enclosed repr( a true, complete, and accurate representation of work to be performed and costs to be incurred in the performance of the proposed project. Authorized Organization Representative Signature: Print AOR Name:Dater Stsv�n , t�._ Shoe' _ . AOR Title: (iommondEr 2020 GY MASTER BUDGET 2021 Snanezol::1ePM,a Initiative 2021 RVRDI A. Agency: r ICE -Homeland Security Investigations LINE ITEM Last Name of Employee First Name HIDTA Title Reimbursable to agency GMU HIDTA paid UB MU Cost 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ 5 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ - $ - 6 B. Fringes Total by Personnel: $ - LINE ITEM Name of employee First Name HIDTATitle GMU UB MU Cost 7 $ 8 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ • - $ - 12 C. OVERTIME - Must be on roster and full time to group it cap ea. FRINGE TOTAL $ - LINE ITEM TFO Last Name TFO First Name Title P/A P/A P/A P/A Cost 13 $0.00 14 $0.00 15 $0.00 16 $0.00 17 $0.00 18 Total by Parent Agency: $ - $ - $ - $ - 19 D. TRAVEL/TRAINING TOTAL OVERTIME MU $ LINE ITEM Detailed Description Number traveling Cost Each GMU UB MU Cost 20 $ 21 $ 22 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ - $ - 23 Total Travel/Training: $ - E. FACILITIES LINE ITEM Location Cost per square foot Reimbursable to agency GMU HIDTA paid UB MU Cost 24 $ 25 $ 26 27 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ - $ - $ - 28 SERVICES- $ LINE ITEM F. Interagency Detailed Description Agreement Roanoke County PD Cost 7 Copier $ 1,529.00 $ 1,529.00 30 Admin $ 22,252.00 $ 22,252.00 31 GPS and Pole Camera $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00- 32 Cell Phones $ - 8,950.00 $ 8,950.00 33 Purchase of Information; Purchase of Information,Purchse of Service PEPIPS funds $ 19,669.00 $ 19,669.00 34 $ - 35 $ - 36 Total to Agency:1 I 1 1 $ 55,500.00 37 Services Total: $ 55,500.00 F. Services - Vehicle Reimbursement (Musi.be on roster and full time) rr year LINE ITEM TFO Last Name TFO First Name Parent Agency Parent Agency Parent Agency Parent Agency. Cost 38 $0.00 39 $0.00 40 $0.00 41 $0.00 42 $0.00 43 0.00 44 $0.00 45 Total by Parent Agency (P/A) $ - $ - $ - $ - i iri - Vehicle Reimbursement Total to MU $ - LINE ITEM Detailed Description Quantity Price Ea. GMU UB MU Cost 48 $ 49 $ 50 $ 51 $ 52 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ - $ - 53 Equipment total: $ - 5/29/202012:10 PM sal MASTER BUDGET 2021 ,,, I - LINE ITEM Detailed Description Quantity Price ea. GMU UB MU Cost 54 general office supplies $ 8,875.00 $ 8,875.00 55 $ 56 $ 57 $ 58 59 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $, - $ 8,8 ��$8875.00 60 Supplies - 1. Other LINE LINE REM GMU UB MU Cost 61 Administrative Fee $ 62 Indirect UB 32.5% Personnel $ - 63 Indirect GMU 10% Personnel + Fringe $ - 64 PEN Reimbursed through MU $ - 65 Total by Fiduciary: $ - $ - $ - 66 Other Total: $ - Total GMU $ - Total UB' $ - Total MU $64,375:00 TOTAL AGENCY $ 64,375.00 TOTAL RESOURCES BUDGET $ 3,125.00 TOTAL TO FEDERAL AGENCY $ - 2021 BUDGETTOTAL 671500 PEPI Federal A enc Aeencv Name Cost 72 -DEA . - .$ - TOTAL FEDERAL Agency $ - RESOURCES �—ffls —area of touched budget1(. LINE ITEM Facilities: Location 5 uare Foot Pers uare Foot GMUCost 73 - .. $ - 74- 75 $ 76 - $ - TOTAL Facilities Resources $ - Services-Descrintion n Cost Ea. MU Cost 77$0.00 78 . ,. $0.00 79$Q.00 80 $0.00 81 TOTAL Services Resources $ - 82 Other Costs: Quantltv Cost Ea. Cost 83 Mercyhurst Admin Fee 1 $ 3,125.00' -$ 3,125.00 84 85 TOTAL Other Resources $ 3,125.00 TOTAL RESOURCES BUDGET $ 3,125.00 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $64,375 FROM THE WASHINGTON/BALTIMORE HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREAS (HIDTA) PROGRAM TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL DRUG UNIT WHEREAS, HIDTA funds are provided to the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit to identify drug trafficking organizations, and when possible, to prosecute the cases as drug trafficking conspiracies; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department serves as the lead agency and the Roanoke County Department of Finance and Management Services serves as fiscal agents; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit received a commitment of funding from HIDTA in the amount of $64,375 for calendar year 2020; and WHEREAS, these funds will be used to continue to support investigations of drug trafficking organizations that are operating in the greater Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 9, 2020, and the second reading was held on July 28, 2020. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. Page 1 of 2 1. That the sum of $64,375 is hereby appropriated from the Washington/Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Grant to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit. 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Open district appointments. BACKGROUND: 1. Library Board (appointed by District) The following District appointments remains open: Vinton Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District 2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism (appointed by District) Mike Roop's three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District has expired effective June 30, 2019. Open Windsor Hills Magisterial District 3. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) Gwen Vieth's four-year term expires July 31, 2020. Ms. Vieth has served two (2) consecutive terms and cannot be reappointed. Supervisor David F. Radford has recommended the appointment of Teena Wilkin to serve a four-year term to expire July 31, 2024. Confirmation has been added to the Consent Agenda. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 28, 2020, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows.. 1. Approval of minutes — July 14, 2020 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $145,725 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim Witness Fund 3. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $574.75 from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) as reimbursement of County expenses for purchases of equipment to support virtual training 4. Confirmation of appointment to the Social Services Advisory Board (District) Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $145,725 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim Witness Fund Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Acceptance and allocation of $145,725 for the Victim Witness Program from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services BACKGROUND: In 1984, the General Assembly created the victim/witness grant program and designated the Department of Criminal Justice as the administering agency. The grant funds provide financial support to local victim/witness programs designed to provide direct services, information, and assistance required by Virginia's Crime Victim and Witness Rights Act. DISCUSSION: This grant awarded to the Commonwealth Attorney's Office will be utilized to provide a Victim Witness Program for Roanoke County. FISCAL IMPACT: Awarded grant federal funds for the Victim Witness Program total $109,294 and State Special Funds total $36,431. There is no County match required with the acceptance of this grant. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to the Commonwealth Attorney's Office Victim Witness Program in the amount of $145,725. Page 2 of 2 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department cif Criminal Justice Service Shannon Dion Washington Building Director 1100 Bank Street Richmond, Virginia 23249 Megan Peterson (804) 786-400D Chief Deputy Director www.dcjs.virginia.gov June 1, 2020 Mr. Dan O'Donnell County Administrator Roanoke County 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: Victim Witness Program Dear Mr. O'Donnell: Congratulations on being a recipient of the above referenced grant program! Your DCJS grant award number is 21-A8561VW19 and was approved for a total award of $145,725, funded in part through Federal Grant 2018-V2-GX-0011 and 2017-VA-GX-0018. The project period is 07/01/2020 through 06/30/2021. Included with this letter is a Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance (SODA). Please note hard copies of the General Special Conditions, as well as the Reporting Requirements and Projected Due Dates, are no longer included as part of the Grant Award Package. Instead, these documents have been combined and are now referred to as Conditions and Requirements and are posted online at htt s://www.dcis.vir inia. ov/�rantsl rant -re uii,etnents. In addition to the General Special Conditions, there may be Specific Special Conditions related to your Grant Award. You are required to view these conditions online via the Grants Management Information System (GMIS) at https://grants.dcjs.virginia.gov/ under menu item View Status -> Special Conditions. If you have not previously done so, you must obtain a user name and password set up by your Finance Officer in order to use this web -based system. We will be happy to assist you in any way we can to assure your project's success. To indicate your acceptance of the award and conditions, please sign the included SOGA and return it electronically within the next 60 days torantsmgmtO) s.vir inia. ov. If you have questions, contact Chrissy Smith at (804) 371-2638 or via email at christeen.smith@dcjs.virginia.gov. Sincerely, Shannon Dion STATEMENT OF GRANT AWARD (SOCA) Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services 1100 Bank Street, 121h Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Victim Witness Program Subgrantee: Roanoke DUNS Number: 006704316 DCJS GrantNumber: 21-A8561VW19 Grant Start Date: 07/01/2020 Grant End Date: 06/30/2021 Federal Grant Number: 2018-V2-GX-001 I and 2017-VA-GX-0018 Federal Awardee: OVC Federal Catalog Number: 16.575 Project Description: To provide direct services for crime victims. Federal Start Date: 10/1/2017 Indirect Cost Rate: % *If applicable Federal Funds: $ 1.09,294 State General Funds: $ State Special Funds: $ 36,431 Agency Match: $ Total Budget: $ 145,725 Projectbirector Project Administrator Finance Officer. Ms. Anne A. Jones Mr. Dan O'Donnell Ms. Laurie L. Gearheart V/W Program Director County Administrator Director of Finance Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County 305 E. Main Street, Rm 202 5204 Bernard Drive P. O. Box 29800 Salem, VA 24153 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 387-6181 (540) 772-2004 (540) 283-8126 ajones@roanokeeountyva.gov roanokeeountyva.gov administration@roanokecountyva.gov llgearheart@roanokecountyva.gov *Please indicate your ICR in the space provided, if applicable. As the duly authorized representative, the undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Awards (SOGA) and Special Conditions, hereby accepts this grant and agree to the conditions and provisions of all other Federal and State laws and rules and regulations that apply to this award. Signature: Authorized Official (Project Administrator) Title: Date: ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 2020 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $574.75 from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) as reimbursement of County expenses for purchases of equipment to support virtual training SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir Director of Development Services APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $574.75 from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development BACKGROUND: Due to the Governor's orders of social distancing and gathering limits, the Virginia Building Code Academy is now providing certification and continuing education classes online. Recognizing that in order for localities to participate in training through virtual means many localities may be in need of equipment necessary to attend online training. The Department of Housing and Community Development has made funding available through the Virginia Building Code Academy for jurisdictional building departments to purchase equipment needed to attend required virtual certification training and continuing education. Eligible purchases include web -cams and other equipment necessary to participate in remote training for Virginia required certification or continuing education. DISCUSSION: The Department of Development Services is purchasing web -cams and headsets for Page 1 of 2 employees to utilize for remote training opportunities. These will allow employees to obtain certifications as well as maintain continuing education requirements for retaining certifications while improving safety by not attending large gatherings of students and following social distancing guidelines. This action authorizes the acceptance and allocation of $574.75. FISCAL IMPACT: State grant funds awarded by DHCD total $574.75. No County funds are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds in the amount of $574.75 from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. Page 2 of 2 O J Ralph S Northam Governor (31MM NWEALTH of VIRGINIA R. Brian Bell Secretary of Commerce and Trade DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 15, 2020 TO: Robert Morgan Yates Roanoke County FROM: Sandi Morris Director, Vir la wilding Code Academy RE: Virtual Training Support Grant Award Erik C. Johnston Director Congratulations! The Department of Housing and Community Development has reviewed and approved your application to the 2020 Virtual Training Support Grant in the requested amount of $574.75. The check will be mailed separately and should be received within 30 days to the address provided on the W-9 form submitted with your grant application. As indicated by your signature on the application you have agreed to the following terms: I. Use the grant funds only as specified in the approved grant proposal unless otherwise approved by DHCD, 2. All grant -approved expenditures must occur by September 1, 2020 unless otherwise approved by DHCD. 3. Provide expense record and receipts to DHCD to verify grant expenditures and activities no later than September 30, 2020, 4. Account for, report, and repay, if necessary, any portion of the funds not used for the specified purposes unless otherwise approved by DHCD, 5. Refrain from use of the funds for any purpose prohibited by law, 6. Cooperate with any efforts of DHCD to publicize the grant award. Again, awarded funds must be spent by September 1, 2020. The completed Expense Report and receipts/proof of purchase are due to our office by September 30, 2020. If you have any questions please contact Kelly Duggins at kelly.dugeinsCa@dhcd.virginia.gov. Thank you for taking advantage of this training support grant opportunity and we look forward to seeing you at future trainings. '++� Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development I Partners for Better Communities F1.10.92110"En w� Main Street Centre 1 600 East Ma n Street. Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23219 www dhcd virginia gov I Phone 1804) 371-7000 1 Fax (804)371-7090 1 Virginia Relay 7.1-1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Confirmation of appointment to the Social Services Advisory Board (District) Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Confirmation of appointment BACKGROUND: Gwen Vieth's four-year term expires July 31, 2020. Ms. Vieth has served two (2) consecutive terms and cannot be reappointed. Supervisor David F. Radford has recommended the appointment of Teena Wilkin to serve a four-year term to expire July 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the confirmation of this appointment. Page 1 of 1 O M O Ln N 01 lD M O N Ol M L. O M N � 00 OJ v O O '0 Ln O O f6� O O m C O V Vi- Vi- � o O O • O C o � N r -I OJ � O Ln 00 Ln 00 f0 OJ 'i V N M N M Q. a O l0 M l0 M CL m N N CL co C O N M o N N 0 O m N Q0 U O U C l6 C � � � N 0 0 O N � � � O M � � 7 � i N O NO ON O O N � � N f6 Li 0J v Q v0 L � 'a O O L Q a, V y � y CL Q C Q Q Q i0 m COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows $ 176,726,541 $ - Outstanding Deletions July 28, 2020 - $ 948,122 8,546,276 74,515,490 - 81,000,000 8,546,276 156,463,612 - 11,716,653 $ 8,546,276 $ 168,180,265 Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Approved By Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Unaudited Outstanding June 30, 2020 Additions General Obligation Bonds $ 948,122 $ - ; VPSA School Bonds 83,061,766 - Lease Revenue Bonds 81,000,000 - _ Subtotal 165,009,888 - Premiums 11,716,653 - $ 176,726,541 $ - Outstanding Deletions July 28, 2020 - $ 948,122 8,546,276 74,515,490 - 81,000,000 8,546,276 156,463,612 - 11,716,653 $ 8,546,276 $ 168,180,265 Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Approved By Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator N c � o > No � N O Cp co V W Q M CO ® to O -a Z O U) ® CD H 'aLL a) ® m 11 ® m w c Z ® E C7o U CD > � H � N 06 LL e L) f9 c i i CL K 7 c d d it \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 N O O M N «'% I- O M M I- a0 O M O ® O r- LP) V V ItT O co O LO ? O d' 00 a0 00 I- O ItT m O N O N N O Co M N N I� 4 N r M O N r I� M O .4 LP) T V O N r--: r--: co N r M r N N d' N 1:3' Lo 07 V d' r w lf) Co = O O lfi lfi r N O) N a M CO O F N M zT ItT N M a0 LO N w w w Co O V O O m Co n Co co r, Itil O r LQ CO (\ CO M R N M a0 d' N r, CO I, r M -It C� Co O M M 1 LP) m r M M q7 co O V lf') I-� V -Iz 00 M N I-� r-� 00 N L6 N r 00 = N CO CO 00 = LO O U')N O M LO � M N M 00 r c r N `-' L r M CSU N CO N n co.� M CO M r r LO 613 CiN r I- O O O 00 O M .m N CO I- O N r N r M Co N N r O r M zT M O O w O O m O C) (fl LP) O O O 0 0 o 0 o O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 oo O O 0 0 0 0 0 � � CO m 07 Cl)Vol 07 a0 O M O O lf') CO O ItT N N I- O ItT M N O I� r--� O Lq r-� U� a0 -It r r M O LO -tT CO r r, O r a0 W M LO N O N COO co O ® CD I� � � O o0 N L6 o0 I� CO �% -4 00 O M M4 M m CO O a0 O O O w O w O O M r, w r LO N n O O r- w CO M M M N CV I- CO = T = I- M = N CO O w ItT LO O w O n O zT ItT O N N Co Co O w r- LO M N M m m n r- O N r- r- r - N o� m U') LO n _ N N = M O M O r, = O O w r- M a0 W r- r co CO LP) r 7 ^ CO q7 M 00 06 or� I-� CO -Iz O O ^ N N LP) CO N I- N O = 00 CO 00 00 = LO LO LO O O LO CO CO ® LO r I- CO N r CO CO r N M O CO N CO CO M CO M r r LO 613 r I- O O O 00 O M CO 07 N CO I- O N r N r M Co N N r O r M zT M O O w O O m O C) (fl LP) O O O O m O I, O co LO O O O O w u CO O O O O O O ® CD 1:T O O O O m O r- 0 0 ® O O m O O O O O O O ® O m O O O O O O U') CD O w O M N O _O O O O O O O ® O LO O O O Co U) O co O O CD m 00 N Co O N O L6 O O O LO O O O U O M 0� O 00 O O N L -Iz -Iz r-� N I- O LO 00 N LO I- O r- N 00 O M CO = m ® r N CO CO ItT CO V r, r ? N M 00 I- co co LO LO ItT LO LQ LO r CO 07 M M M r M r M CO N r r ta 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o I- 00 co CO M LO M O CO M T CO CO M CO (n V N LO r 00 O 0) r r M N Nr- 00 LO 00 M O O 00 O M r LO 00 I, r, � O M M M LO M M CO CO = M I� N O O = O O O O O O O O ® 07 O O N O O M O o7 O ® O O d' N O O r O M CO r O O T 00 00 d M CO W O LO m O O O O N CO O O MCOMMCDN V T N O O V O lf') a0 N m n N nO N M M r N w O CO z3, N O m N � O w O r- a0 O M CO I- N M M _ LO r- LQ rl� N O N lt: 00 O O M N CO O N m LO n m 00 N m CO 00 CO m oo Co co = Lo co CO I-� CO LO IZ3, co V N 00 Cl) r� N CO N O O CO r, O = 00 00 I, M 00 r .m M O r- r CO IZ3, CO CO LO LO CO O N CO r M r M I-� N r r 4co 613 I- O O O 00 O M O O O I- O O NO r IT Co N O O O a0 O zT O O O w O O m O C) (fl LP) O O O O m O I, O co LO O O O O w u CO O O O N O V O N O N O O CO -li C) It O 00 O 00 LO I, LO OCO M w m M N 00 ? Co -Itr- co Co M m lf') CO C"? N 07 N co r M O r M CO N r r M E9 r O M CO r O O T 00 00 d M CO W O LO m O O O O N CO O O MCOMMCDN V T N O O V O lf') a0 V) N x cc N C x O H CO U) E E O o 0 J H m 0 N J a) m x c6 ~ Oa) t LL CD L L) J N o 2 T x a) c U � .- D_� X F --O E w O as o (q w m N X CO- a) x O � o � O" U � a fn a) w O CO m m J a) a) LL a) LL O U o Y °) U aa) M m T Q 0 p � Q x O cc H co2-1 m O H C H Q oCL w X U .2a H p U J a) U) a) to a) C7 w C: .m 0 " E75 r O M CO r O O T 00 00 d M CO W O LO m O O O O N CO O O MCOMMCDN V T N O O V O lf') a0 V) N C x O H CO U) E E O o 0 J x H~ Y - - N c° 0= 0 m 0 N J a) m x c6 ~ Oa) t LL CD L L) J N o 2 a25 O O O N O X m H x a) c U � .- D_� X F --O E w O as o (q w m N X CO- a) x O m Ci o J O ® o � O" U � a fn a) w O CO m m J �, m a) LL a) LL O U o Y °) U aa) M m T Q 0 p � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® O Cl) ® M LO 00 N U) m M 07 N O O tt) M O V 00 O co O U� N r- 00 m N 1:31 I, r- 00 m O CO O m .c N O M co M � ' �% 00 � LO O N CO co O �% N O I� CO O L6 O CO m QiJ 0 $y O O d7 m r, CO O I, i0 i 0) I r" Itil r N co qT r N 00 CO r- tf') r `-' co ® 00 ... NM O O co O 00 M N O N O ItT O co 0) ? ® 04 W tP) U5 = CO M :I' O = N CO CO = M N 00 = co r t15 T a 7 d7 d � ® N ® O N O 00 VolVolVol*, C� ® 00 O N O O O O ID O o7 r- ? ® 0) O O O N 00 O r O O O O O n Ci O V 1:T N r O cn M M 07 O r- CO O O �;') ? M ® O O a0 N W N O N a0 O O O 07 O o0 I- O CO tf') o0 m O N r tf) r O O O CO O a0 O O 00 00 N 0 �p ®y N T 0) I- O O rl ® ® 00 '31 O r- O 07 t0 U) W O tP) N co ItT O 00 CR m ItT 00 00 Cl) COM r, V r M M r- CO 00 O) r- r- O N v N O M O N O r- co CO ++ C ` 7 C 41 ® Cl) M V CD co c M O N O r ® LO M N M- C- M N � M M 1:3100 00 co t1') o) r N CO M r U5 O 00 -Iz O N V (y V CO r N � N M tf) o) N r V U) O ® O O ® Lf') O O U) V CO Lf') U) O co O co O O O a+ 41 0) M 00 Cl) �_ O Lf') M LO ® U) Cl) �) O O O N O N 0 T ® N 00 M M I- O O LO O O O O I, rl C ® �2 = LO O Lo I- CO LO 0 O It3l r, I, � V o) N M M ® O O N O zt co CO O) N O O O 00 CO 00 CO U5 o) = O O tf) N CO O LO V 0 N t15 V N -Iz ®y 7 0 0) ® N 0 CO CO N N 0 :0 <o N N 0 co N o0 0 CO lzt r--� m 0 Il ® (0 M � 0 N CO V M 0 CO M N r 0 O O O 0 0) 00 0) 0 I- O M r 0 00 CO O n r 0 r- O 4 O r 0 00 N � 0 r, 00 O O r 0 CO zT O r 0 CO V (p7 n 0 I- 00 0) m 0 LO IZ3, CO N r 0 0 O O O O O O m 9 +� 91 co (14 N M co U) d' IZ3, O 00 O r- 00 U) d' m M LO m O O ` M L LO r tS9 r co t1) 00 V ® I- 00 ItT IZT M co CO LO co M 00 N 0(i M IZ3, M r M 00 M V O t1) 41 LO ® CO 07 co 0) CO N N N � r co t!) (M 07 -It® co N 00 N N t1) O t!) 0) co N N t!) n O I- r o7 co O r, V r N � CO -li ® t> r MqT N T M N ® O ® O O ® LO O O L CO LO LO r- O (14 CO ItT O O a+ ®1 -® ® N 0) I® O Lf') d' O '31N ® LO qT ® O O Lf') T O N (O(fl ® N � CO r- � O O O <o rl� co N LO U5 N CO CO O CO O M CO CO M d7 00 r U) cic� LO W N � CO LO CO U o) O LO IZ3, O 00 LO I- r O U) r o) N N CO O O U50) to U v J to LL .E m a H U Y LL•� a m c ii N N - e L` H > ° ° O U)) =� > � N Q 0 O U) c > � p_ o d N o N H U U O m coo U cn U N U O m (cc0 U Q .o m W U d ® to U H E N m y E to O to c 1 > � O � to Y U N ° > OU � O 4 U 5 H(6 a .0 ami CO U Z� Q x w° N O m U N U > U) U) oa Q U ° N C6� L O N U .> (n co U)Q m (o -a -Oa Q LL u' O c .o U L W 0 Vo, $ Vol $ Vol Vol § T 7 / \ / \ ■ R a 0 a 0 t k B � / 0 0 7 ¢ J co o _ e f04 C k � m k Vol 2 Vol 2 Vol Vol $ k $ g \ g \ \ It % 0 0 0 0 $ $ § \ k Q 2 > r, o 0 m ¢ m ƒ 7 k \ k \ � 2 2 % B (14 C14 a $ 0 $ a a Lo y 0 $ 2 § 3C) ci ® \ E e � Cl) 7 \ k§ / q G y e « a a co q J CL it LO LO \ k \ 0 k % % k 2 U $ .0 _ (14 a (14a r, \ $ ® � § k } § $ 75 G 4) j ' $ § / ) k I 2 § F- E E �_ \ ° 7 2 / \ / F- 3 0 e C c O - 0 0 0 0 0 0 o R o 0 o a o a o o a 0 0 0 o a a (0 DO O M M N Cl) CO V N O P W Ln O 00 00 O 00 0 "tM O Cl) N P C9 O 00 O O Cl) ® O O LO W V O9 O P O O of O 't C O CO to N T � h N ® O LO M NM N Cl O V r O 00 O - .@ @ Q @ E C > N _ N N N Q @_ U O N 0 Q F o0E O C Q i0 C7 C -O > N CCO cc N U @ oa a CL ' D o N 2 as v@ o> x n Q N cn 0) O O N LL @ 0 W > O @ O U N @ O i+' N O S Q N O O C £ O Y r @ rte.+ @ U > .N N U N (. @ @ @ C C O C @ Ui N D m P _ O V LO P P V LO O O O 00 (o P P P O m O V In O 00 O W V LO V O P co O CO Cl) m U YO @ @ LO O W (o V P Cl O N V O P V V N _O @ (.7 7 IL @ CL Ln O CL O 00 @ > P V P O O O P P P N O M 00O Uy 0000 O V V N (o LO N O) v O O O V O v ® U) V N 00 V O O Cl) P l0 `-' W 00 N In N In M v r Nr LO Q 0 0 0 o OR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P M 00 r P N LO P U')P N V Ln O W LO 00 M O LO V O O N M V O w O O O co N O O O O N O O SgO O P U 00N 00 C14 00 00 O 00 O C14 M O 00 O O 00 O O ry' r 00 r A r r r r i Lu m � w U CL O 0 W c @ 00 O 00 N P 00 N Cl) O (o O 00 P O P O Cl) O O Cl) O (o M 00 In In ® g0 O r O O) COI P P O O co P P Meq LO O N N r O O O N LO V ® of O N O O O O LO Lf) LU N m r LOgj N LO 00 O O N N W co W O O W N O LO O LO Cl) O LO O O (® } 7 M ((O (NO W N C :� c E O P r r N V T O V V N r C P V C4 co O d G C ' C 7 U W W c ' � ca W CL T cc O W_O N M LO V N 00 O P O N V LO LO O O V O O O 00 Ln O O O to z Q @ U @ 7 P O P r V M 63 P P M LO O M O P O V V M N P 00 Ln O) O P LO P toP r LO M V O O O Co CO U -O F N V Ln O _O 00 Ln O O P P N P P O Cl) P 04 N O O Cq 00 P O O 00 Cry O O 00 N 00 r P A w M ( V Ln P P W M O Co O r O) W N 00 In r O C LL -C r j P 00 r N V O O LO V r r C W V C W m W m z N c Z ® C U O o o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m > 00 M V O O r iA 't N P M N OB O V Cl) O 00 N V W 00 (o O r 00 O O r O r N O O 00 N O O P N LO W9 O V P9 O (o (o Ctm F C r O P O P O P of O O O O P o) O O O co O O ® ® N O O V O V O N O O CO! ® O CO O LO O O O 00 O C+9 E W m r r r r r r 0 ca I, CL O U) W W W @ 00 LO N LO P LO It V P LO P 00 LO LO O MP M o0 Co 00 O O LO O Ln O 00 O O M O M LO co O P O O L12 CL 0) d M In Ln V N (o O P O O N V V M O P V O g O � 0, U N c O O O LO W M 00 LO P V O O (0 LO 00 N P V O LO P LO 00 M V O N O P N O to O CO o0 O O O L) Y M Ln M Ln N P r N O LO LO P O O N O V V N 04 c E 00 r r N O T 00 N Ln Ln N r P V cli O 4 CL 0 W W N O O N O Cl) (o V P O C14O V N O Co m O O C2 MLO LO N V O P NN O 00 V) N o0 O O CO O Co W N N CO! 00 O O Ln N Lfl 00 Cq CO V V (OI M O N 00 (O CO to 63 @� O O W 00 co O P LO P P O (o to P N M O P P LO 00 M C� O V N N O P N 0, M P V L[9 Ln N 00 W V M CO N P O o0 r � In o0 P -O 00 r r N T T 00 CtA V V N r C P V C m � C c O - O (0 C CO N 7�5 c O U O CO C _ U to O C U N Q - .@ @ Q @ E C > N _ N N N Q @_ U O N 0 Q F o0E O C Q i0 C7 C -O > N CCO cc N U @ oa a CL ' D o N 2 as v@ o> x n Q N cn w c O N LL @ 0 W > O @ O U N @ O i+' N O S Q N O O C £ O Y r @ rte.+ @ U > .N N U N (. @ @ @ C C O Q @ Ui @ D m O @ N _ _ U N N to Q C U @ • F `. N N S (D @ = W @ �% @ @ 7 C C N m U YO U @ Q U @ y N N O L j @ J �_ LL_ O 0 C Q 7 IL N (.7 N @ T CL W to @ (.7 7 IL @ CL O (n 0 U CL O @ (n i 0 R 0 3' o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3' a o 0 0 U _M N W O O O OR ,1: O O (n (n O O O M n 00 V N N O (n N O N O 00 N r N M N O u M N M 10 T O O O 0B r O r r U d U C o0 00 V O O 00 O LO (O O 00 O CD M (O NM N (D V O O O O N 63 In O CO O Cl) P l0 N O N N V LQ M 00 (D (n O N C N (L) j v ® N o00vo P m v LO rn co m y P 63 M M (p LO r r (tl Q 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 0 c o o O E P O O r O O 0) ® V (n P V r O O ® co N O V (n V N r O O O O O O N O N O O I M 't 7 U'a d N O N O O W P P O (D O P O O W O O O O 00 O O O 00 P C O 0i 0B T M 0) 00 W 7 m � w Q O W to V P O m (0 O (f) V O O V P O O M 00 P O V M P r (0 N O P CO C O O O C O M (n (0 P P P (0 N (D U00 Qi (D } C m P W (ND CO co W M co N O co � LO O _ M M 7 00 ® a7 V N P N M 0c� 0) C C g N M P r 0) r C4 N O V CD (6 03 Di N Q C 7 U W W W O O P M M V P 0) LOO V LO 00 Cl) P O O (n P O O O O O LO O P C) 0) (0 P P (D 00 00 V P LL7 O N 0B W O O O O 00 P P (D 00 co Cl) O P 00 Cl) LO 0) co (D N LO (D O O N d N LO N V M r r r W L -p N V r P r O M N Cl) M m V O® C 0) m N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 P N N (0 O O 00 P N (D N P LL7 O O 00 O O O P In N N O O O O O O 00 ® N O O O Cl 0) ® r U LO M O (® P O (n O 00 00 O It N O N O N O O O Cl 04 O O O O ® 0) C 0) 0) r T N C) co W 7 � Q O 0 W M V O ON (0 N O (D (0 N (n C) @i N r 00 O O co V O O O O ® M 0) m O P 0) (� N yJ W M P O) (D M O P V W O ® V (0 t�! d U00 C so W � (n CT cN O (n (D (q In O r M ^ 0q LO } c € N V) P r P r M r CD CD V (6 N g IL CL 0 w W` ca V (D O W O M P m O m O 0) ® V (D O O (O 00 O C) O O O O O O ® lf) N (0 O I, N C® M 00 O V (f) V O M 6) 0) O P O O O Lf N O O P _ O V W P (0 N 00 O O O O M Cl) N 00 ® LO f® m Oi W ® O M P V V 00 r 00 00 r W � P 7 N In 0 r P r M N 0 N C) V (ry (F3 m N N C O N C O E O) O 0- Q 2 @ 0 U 7 (O 7 O a O @ N_0 p c U CcV co cc' Cc OHN O O r p £ a O m C(p N p W > N 9 , -0C c Oa) ) WD O CN 0 W ED 2 HNc 0 4D p O N O) @ O QW p -O O N N -C N O O C C O Q N N U � N -p 7 ELL ® C 7 7 pn IL J U a d 0 O W C 0 d W o 2 X F (O w m (p D z E s F C7 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 2020 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - June 2020 SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 06/12/20 Payroll 06/26/20 Manual Checks Grand Total Direct Deposit Checks 1,329,153.33 6,890.97 1,532,147.49 7,219.73 321.88 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Total $ 9,636,405.06 1,336,044.30 1,539,367.22 321.88 $ 12,512,138.46 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Work session to discuss amendments to the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority Articles of Incorporation Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator This time has been set aside to discuss amendments to the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority and answer any questions that the Board of Supervisors may have regarding this issue. Page 1 of 1 GJ 0 +j QJ -�e ca OH O D +j O i, •rl rl L O +.+ O ++ ++ ++ O 0 0 L •rl ++ O r -I O O ca v� u ++ r -I bW N O a) •rl •rl ++ v� O ca ca Vf V L b -A •rl V +j L M Q V1 O Ml � � � ƒ 0 \ C) % — C � E = y � -0 § \ E 0 cc -0 C _ ? 0 % 2 0 _> : Q) E 0 � -0 � -0 0 \ Cc Q)0 E k / a } 'j)- / Co 02 0 2 m ± -0 = 0 ± _ cc c § -0 _ _ 2 \ / 0 ƒ E U) 2 / £ 1c0 t -0 ? / _ _ _ q / ) 3 q D = m _ \ G = m — E = e = g22 / ? ± 3 U c: Cc Q) = o = m m 5 = £ £ / � 0 0 2 \ >, \ ƒ 0::31000 LL 0 2 35 � mƒ = m m § /§ 0 � ® k Z3a) �: _ 2 » e Cc £ £ m a y .2 ® 0 q 2 = Q) cc0 5 £ m 2 \ -0 2 y G Q)Q) = m = «) _ .- CL o m G = > _ E § 2 0 2 g E � % 2 U) _ o @ _ � / 2 « � 0- e m - £ _ V Q O U 9 +- o co +- 4-1 O > O U Q i O > O Q Q �O 4-1 O N Q O +_+4-1 O O O co -0 0c O Q co 70 U) c m O O co (1) co � � Q U4-1 O to o co E _O m o d) to U 4-1 i co 4-1 U E -0.0 E � o �.� Q -0co 1 � � -o_Q O O U > E O }, U O U) O O c U) Oate) co � O >, O (0-0 — U) � U)a=+ �co O (BU Q Z3 O _O (B to +�+ _O Q O U O-0 00 co j co > O 4-1 _0 i �O F- U c op - �+ O U A U .N U U O U ate-+ O j O Q CO C O O O -0� � co O}' Z3C O o m � UA_0 O (B UU) _0m Q co O C� D 0 > c Z W W n O U w ry O U F - Z CW G 0 J a W CW G 0 t; V z W 0 Y 0 H W z k ƒ_ � D £ A § Q 2 Cc$. 00-0 Q w D G � � Q) ƒ ƒ $ CL5 Q) Q) / -i 5 cc ? 2 g 0 F 0 Q _ 0 y 0 C) � Q) E \ cc 0� R � o § ƒ U) Q) cc o \ / kmcc E E CL m�j U) _ �§CL �E k % \ _ > _ m _ 3b2 Q) CL U)'c) --I 0 5\ C) \ \ 2 4� / . =R _ % =o 2 ƒ �� o k CZ - Q) _ §U) _ 0� _ U) 0C- Q)3 0 CL Cc ® k /� 0\ Q)}o g� Oƒ "1 cc 0 cc 3 k) \ _ Q) C / 0 Co � E Q) 0\ /k %/ �k 0_ c2 �£ -0> =0 // /_ \� �2 0 \ )\ o / \ �k k� // // io _ �( U) -00 k= ==e (1) >(D e' X ƒ 3 � LU LO co M N N N N N I Ml �U C6 EL 4-1 m 4-1 c O U c co c O 4-1 4 4-1 c O U co U O 0 co -0 _0 �E O 07L() ,- (13 CO Eo 1--0 o (1) oCO Q-0 U)-0 U) (1) U U E U) EO O U) E :1Q- 0 ocX U)C � •nuo 4-1 U ,_0 O Q co (B tea' CO U Z3 1ap E U) co m O U) _ co a--+ ,0 D .E E }, 0 a=+ coo Lo 4-1 O I 0 W 0- T T O Q > 4 O Q) O Z3 > �EI-- E �O1— (DO —(DO U)OO O (B Q D 4-1 E U) m co c O_ O O U) 4-1 U) O U O U 0 U) a-1 bu0 _O 4 O co U) Q U) 4-1 co Q co c O_ •b�A m m 4-1 c O co co a-1 U) a--+ O bu0 0 a--+ c O 4-1 co O a� m m U)0 p :si� •1 + .� .. 0 4-1m m co c O a--+ co a--+ 4 O 4-1 co a� U) c O U U) +_+ 0 D CO +� -0 0 E O co D � 07 c c (B Z3 E o ,o U) .0 co 1--o 4-1� wo 1O U)� co LL o 4-1 0 Q Q D U) ate-++ co U O U O m N O N N N O }N L.L co U U) E U) co 0 4-10 0 4-1 wo O U MP C O O O N N O O r -I IL r -I O O O N O O LL LU U 0 0 0 z Q O O O 0 0 N LL O Q O O � J Q � LU > 0 O 0 71 U j 0 LO o 0 0 LL ZQ J Q m >' 0 `n a U z 0 o _ 00 Q z 0 m 0 o 0 71 LL 0 0 m 0 O 000 ow rl- 0- 0 LL 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ON 0 00 0 � O N 0 0 O O O N - c c +D M M (3.) O O O m 00 = = Cn O ti O ti � co 00 00 ti c * c ti r -I 00 (D 00 ti 4 o (3.) m N m m 0 m C9 Q U = O Cn i 0 .s O r -I O r -I N co cflmcflti ti * r -I co r -I N (D ri 0 4 o (3.) rI N t 0 m C9 Q U = r Cn i N O U U U N LC) LC) r I I` ti LC) I` ti LC) U (D C� N rI (3.) O C O co .2- 0 U c .s O r -I O r -I N co cflmcflti ti * r -I rn r -I N (D ri rI 4 o (3.) rI N t cfl m C9 Q 00 = r Cn 000000oI;t co cflmcflti ti * ti rn }> ri (D ri i3i 4 o (3.) U o c M U o c M (3.) cfl m C9 C9 00 = r v a OO O O ti -:tti Cb O N O Cl N 0') N Co r -I O 00 O 00 LQ LQ q 00 N N LC) C9 C9 N N N LC) O Cb Cb Cb I;t rI rI rI LC) I` ti ti r -I N N N Cb m m m rn co co O O ON }> o 0 N 4 o (3.) U o c M U o c M (3.) O O O m 00 = = Cn O U c� V'U^^ '! LL M^ 'o^ V! 0 O U L— a) a) ^E W �rnrnrncm om°ti°miO LO Q0 N Q0 N 0 0 0 LO rl O m O Cfl L6 r -;i rF r � cfl ti cfl � (D Q0 0 F N F0 N O O O O O 0 0 Cfl Cfl 0 oLO L o U (D Q0 N y U U O LO m m O ri O LO LO m O rI I;t 00 O 00 N I I;t 00 N U m + 00 Cfl (D Cfl 00 Cfl co O Q0 Q0 Q0 m 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Lo (D N O Co L6 Q0 N O LO 00 Q0 N N LO Co 0 N N co 00 i O 0 L� 00 I` 00 ti 00 ti I;t LO Lfl 0 O O 00 ri 00 ri 00 ri N I;t LO 00 00 co 0 m co 0 ~ O 0 O 0 ON 0 0 0 0 N 0 + 0 0 00 = = Cn 00 = = Cn �i(fl(fl0m O�*m�* �i �i O ti m N 00') Cy) Co 000�icflcfl Orntirn r-- 6 Cd 6 C6 cq 0000mcq L6C6C6(Y ( I` LC) r i N (9 I;t 0') I;t 00 00 ti ti co C9 C9 (9 Cy) 0 N 0 rI �I O O 0 moo m - N (D (D m N N � � co co LO LO O 0 U U o O O C-> � N N 0 0 U U Co 00 N Co C9 LC) C9 r -- LO LO� .LO —I N N Cy I` C6 ;:i N C6 N C6 6 (3.) LC) LC) LC) (D (3.) LC) LC) LC) LO 00000000 0000 0000 co LC) LC) LC) LC) cc O O O O I` N ti ti � 00 Co 00 0')N Co N 00 Z N Co N 00 0 0') 0') 0') 0')00 coo coo coo . i 0 LC) O 00 00 00 LC) i Lf) r- ti r-� (6 Lf) 0 0 0 I` 0 N N N 00 0 ri ri ri m U) U) co co 0 0 OCN ~ rI ~ O N N +_� 0 0CN 0 ON 0 0 0 0 0 o o o c N (3.) c c � co co M M m==cn m==cn MP C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O oD W O O LD O O O O O -i N LL LL O N W J 6) Q ri (n LL W �i LL MF U) C O 00 OU 000 g U W of a W W Z - a U) z O < a L C O O wcr 0 w H oa U z a O a U) U m w N 00 U) ■ ■ ti z C w w c O 0 20- - }� LL O LUJ cr 0-1 w4-1 z J -i Q J 0 a a � 0 0 0 0 U) Q J O O O O O H a 0 0 0 0 0 0 cl _ 0 ate-+ O O O O O O O a U ~ U_ O c 0 < U) O � — a O ■ ■ U a U < U) O O ■ ■ 00 U U O } L.L � cr O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ON O O O O O O ON O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O o m U) C O 00 OU 000 g U W of a W W Z - a U) z O < a L C O O wcr U cr H oa U z a O a U) U m w N ■ ■ ti z C O 0 20- - }� LL LUJ cr J -i Q J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cl z a O O O O O O O a 0 < U) O 00 ~w O wcr m w N cr z C 20- - 0 LUJ J -i Q J a U) O cr H U U C cl z a a 0 < U) O ■ ■ U O U O } L.L cr O O O O O O O O O O O O O ON ON O 000 COO � mo O O 00 U)w w O w Cl) _cr O_ �--� lA to w <-i (n WW a QJ Of z O L C _ Z O o w J� � � z Z O ~ � ■ J a_ O a cr 0 U)O ■ U ■ ■ O w r -i O O E3 z N o 0-1 000000000 W a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 za Ocr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � z S O o U)w Cl) _cr O_ �--� to w <-i (n WW a QJ . O _ Z O o a_ cr a Z a U) U m w N ■ ■ w O E3 z O o 0-1 000000000 W a . Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 za Ocr 0 0 0 0 00 ~ a w 0 0 � z S O a U o ■ ■ O N cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 ri Cl) _cr O_ �--� to w <-i (n WW a QJ W z = O _ Z O o a_ cr a Z a U) U ■ ■ O o 0-1 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 k t \ / _ ��� § §\ \ ©{ƒ�2 00 \\}\\ LLI LLI J:®`5 \!z00ooo \�\\\ \\ �E> ƒ8 0, J) oo /\\ \ \\\ }© ��� E �� \ ©{ƒ�2 \\}\\ J:®`5 .e}{0 \\ �E> ƒ8 0, J) � /\\ \ \\\ }© LU LU i M N E Q _O N N 0 N U O U) N 0 Q O O U N 4-1_ 4- 0 _ v ca (D L- 40- 6 0 a (D L- ED v _ c� 4- 0 4-1 4-1 a� :Lj �3 CD -0 0 V)L-L- C) Co = a� U) N _.0 D � 3 � 00 _U) i 'a c� '> 0 as ac co a� v > c cc o= C � U- cl N O H � a� a 0 0 0 C O M 40 tC M N 3 O N _ 4 U) O 0 A LO N M 40 tC N O v U=o t0 N d O uoo ea _ Z" c O U a� _ ea _ to _ _ a� c 0 O N O *'' N 2 11 _ 0 E rn M a� c`a U �o �' O U a. �h m 03 m m 4- o c t m a a c > > ca co c tao� > c00o n E� E>>+n ;p — �� �aM a So a�0 coCwo ea o �• 4-jV _ c ai y _ `.0 0-0 a *•' m > m aiE'0m p� .0 N a V C o 0 c m r m m E .0_ Ea o=mc tHyo o-• `—" m ET N -- m to o �o =_ �0�0 cna m o a E m 4.1 to +mac r- ca uo m c o m o E=CIOa" N- E to L ,- `-c an y=aQ CIM m m m w n mrM to o it 3 o mNN n m �mo�o c 0 c m= 4-1m0'a m oa o - 4t: M c > o�� om a ya.- r =+ o U C t��C G =�c�c p.0 V 0 c N o=•—(no E-000 N m V p=> ome E0E — p 4-1 0-�3 0 to r -E � N .0 m E m v�v E muom� ���.� O n 0 " �t > M-0 Nt 0 0 0 to vi = m E +r _';� U� m +rEtao ago=m N� 3 Np o a p p o V Cr aE� m �crCl f ) Z c c +j as is >aa`av > c - C' o> d) c 0� O = iaaa�v -a0E Q =Noo -00'�mo U" UO=�C0 �xpp V E d) � d) E --:9 ca UD m= �c.Z� OEm3a � UM�c aEc,oa m >vicv,Z = o. a=v 3t° y ) O tf N md) GJ to UID = 0 =� N ON +0+ 0.0 E ONt0.t0 is �`nmE 0 0 N CL — c a GyJ�=O� U) m +O+ as oc > Maio" '� a O yE p O CL �, O, GJ m GJ OMxEO O t am) cm 0 O L V� GJ d)CD ' N C zv= = Qpm o o o� c as o �a�75 aa= a �+ a �-vim o=+;vca o E C 1W= V y 0 0 N 0 r CLV as +, o 3 U) � 0 m 0 U) U) 0Q+�o+ +� o 3 =C o omo=� v=i Nm Q0 �ox� t � }'=m c'mcoa• oa U) N to to = t = GJ _ •N UD N N to ubE '>� v co �aao a t'— �o�� 0 a �ooEE a o c E o E+o-+vain t° a = as 0M3�C Cj 'ao <n�oe„u QU)'pU) +' m=�ca x Z' a)CD om 3m a+= N N N -p.ub p � E 0 N ca is �0 p tC N 4a N 0 L +' OM®� 4a = > Na.� �c=v z N Nt++D�=> ac=v>E O OC to 3 � t o N ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 Resolution congratulating the Glenvar High School Girls Swim Team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 2 Championship Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator This time has been set aside to recognize the Glenvar High Schools Girls Swim Team as State Champions. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2019 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SWIM TEAM FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) CLASS 2 CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, athletic competitions are an important and integral part of the team curriculum at schools in Roanoke County; teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, teamwork and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Glenvar Highlanders earned their trip to the State championship game by winning the Region 2C championship on February 10, 2020, at the Christiansburg Aquatic Centers by sending a team of eight (8) girls, now known as the "Great Eight", swimming 13 individual events and all three (3) relays; and WHEREAS, the Highlanders achieved the State title by out -pointing runner-up Bruton 242-232 on February 20, 2020, at Swim RVa in Richmond Virginia; and WHEREAS, Individually, Junior Reese Dunkenberger won the 100 yard freestyle championship for the second consecutive year. Reese is also the State record holder in the event and freshman Claire Griffith won the 50 yard freestyle title. The girls also had two individual runner-up swimmers and finished runner-up in two of the three relay events. All totaled the Glenvar girls brought 20 championship medals and the State Championship trophy back to the community. The team represented their school and community with great character, poise and sportsmanship. They are a true asset to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Highlanders are coached under the dedicated leadership of Coach Shannon Hall. Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SWIM TEAM: Seniors, Alyssa Meadows and Meghan Thompson, Juniors - Reese Dunkenberger and Isabelle Pope, Sophomores - Delaney Eller and Carly Wilkes, Freshmen - Claire Griffith and Adrianna Hall; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 0.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: July 28, 2020 Resolution approving the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: The Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority has requested the Board of Supervisors approve Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to include two additional members. BACKGROUND: Currently, the Roanoke Valley Board Band Authority (RVBA) consists of five (5) individual members. Each of the four (4) governing bodies of the participating localities appoints a locality member. These locality members then vote to choose the fifth (5) citizen member, whose membership is confirmed by the governing bodies of the participating localities. DISCUSSION: The Virginia General Assembly recently passed an amendment to the Virginia Wireless Services Authority Act at Virginia Code section 15.2-5431-15.2-3431.37 (the Act) allowing authorities governed by the Act to increase their membership to include up to seven (7) members. In accordance with the aforementioned amendment and the changes to the Act, the RVBA seeks to add two (2) additional citizen members: a sixth (6t") citizen member nominated by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and a seventh (7tn) Page 1 of 2 citizen member nominated by Carilion Clinic. Both the sixth (6th) and seventh (7th) citizen members must be confirmed by the locality members. The RVBA feels adding representatives from these two (2) dynamic and vital institutions will add depth and breadth to the vision and mission of the Authority. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY BROADBAND AUTHORITY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority (the Authority"), is an authority formed and existing in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 54.1 of Title 15.2 of the ode of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Virginia Wireless Services Act §§ 15.2-5431.1- 15.2-5431.37 (the "Act"); and, WHEREAS, by concurrent resolutions adopted October 21, 2013, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia ("Roanoke County"), the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia ("Botetourt County"), the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia ("Roanoke City"), and the Council of the City of Salem, Virginia ("Salem City") adopted Articles of Incorporation (the "Articles") of the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority (the "Authority") pursuant to the provisions of the Act; and, WHEREAS, the Authority has organized itself and operated successfully under the Articles and has established itself as an effective agent in the Roanoke Valley for its primary network infrastructure; and, WHEREAS, the Authority has established its significant network footprint in the Roanoke Valley and now serves major education and research institutions in the Innovation District of the City of Roanoke and mission critical enterprises across all the localities of the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority; and, Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, the Authority's revenues continue to increase with the addition of service providers utilizing its open access carrier grade fiber optic network; and, WHEREAS, the Authority continues to expand its network and serve the Roanoke Valley to support its mission and mandate; and, WHEREAS, the Authority continues to examine and evaluate new service areas and delivery methods to support the economic development and well-being of the Roanoke Valley; and, WHEREAS, the Authority has lobbied the Virginia General Assembly for the ability to increase the number of its Members and has received an amendment to the Act permitting the increase of its Members from five (5) to seven (7); and, WHEREAS, the Authority is considering the addition of Members representing Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Carilion Clinic; and, WHEREAS, the Authority is following the procedure for amendment contained within the current Articles of Incorporation; and, WHEREAS, the Authority, through its Board of Directors, has resolved to amend and restate its Articles of Incorporation so as to allow additional membership in keeping with the recent changes to the Act enacted by the Virginia General Assembly; and, WHEREAS, the Authority now seeks approval from the governing bodies of each of its member localities to amend, restate and file with the Virginia State Corporation Commission its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation substantially in the following form: Page 2 of 10 AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATI ON OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY BROADBAND AUTHORITY The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, the Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Council of the City of Salem. Virginia (the "Locality Members"), have by concurrent resolutions adopted the following Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority, pursuant to the Virginia Wireless Services Authorities Act (Chapter 54.1, Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended), (the "Act"). The Authority shall exist for a term of fifty (50) years from the date of the adoption of the concurrent resolutions as a political subdivision. ARTICLE I NAME AND ADDRESS The name of the Authority is the Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority (the "Authority") and the address of its principal office is 601 South Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Roanoke, VA 24011. The location of the principal office may be changed by the concurrence of three-fourths (3/4ths) of the Authority members present at any regular meeting, provided that the clerk of the governing body of each Locality Member has been notified of the contemplated relocation in writing at least thirty (30) days before such meeting. ARTICLE II CREATING JURISDICTIONS These Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation shall not be further amended Page 3 of 10 or changed without the express agreement of the governing body of each Locality Member. None of the following actions shall be taken or permitted to occur by the Board of the Authority without the affirmative vote of a majority of the Individual Members from each incorporating political subdivision creating the Authority: I. The inclusion of additional political subdivisions in the Authority. 2. Additional agreements with political subdivisions other than Authority members, entities, or persons, local universities and colleges, local hospital systems, the Town of Vinton, and the Western Virginia Water Authority for the expansion of services or network, or wireless infrastructure. ARTICLE III MEMBERS, TERMS OF OFFICE The Authority will be governed by a Board consisting of seven (7) Individual Members, four (4) of which have been appointed or confirmed by the Locality Members. The fifth (5th) Individual Member is a Citizen Member who has been recommended by the Members and confirmed by the Locality Members. The sixth (6th) Individual Member shall be a Citizen Member nominated by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and confirmed by the Locality Members. The seventh (7th) Individual Member shall be a Citizen Member nominated by Carilion Clinic and confirmed by the Locality Members. The term of office of the Authority Members shall be for four (4) years. Members may serve additional terms as appointed or nominated by their governing body. The initial terms of office for the sixth (6t") and seventh (7t") Citizen Members shall be staggered with the initial terms being for approximately 2 and 4 years ending December 12 in the appropriate year. Page 4 of 10 The names and addresses, and terms of office of the current Members of the Board of the Authority and the two (2) new Citizen Members are as follows: Name and address Designator Term expires Jay Taliaferro Salem 12/12/23 City Manager's Office 114 North Broad Street Salem, VA 24153 2. Dan O'Donnell Roanoke County 12/12/21 County Administrator's Office 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 3. Gary Larrowe Botetourt County 12/12/23 County Administrator's Office 1 West Main Street, Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 4. Michael McEvoy Broadband Authority 12/12/21 Western Virginia Water Authority 601 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24011 5. Robert S. Cowell, Jr. Roanoke City 12/12/23 City Manager's Office Room 364, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 6. Scott F. Midkiff, Ph.D Virginia Tech 12/22/22 Vice President for Information Technology and Chief Information Officer Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Vice President for Information Technology (0169 Burrus Hall, Suite 314, Virginia Tech 800 Drillfield Drive Blacksburg, VA 24061 7. Robert K. Perry (Keith) Carillion Clinic 12/12/24 Senior Vice President and CIO Carilion Clinic 451 Kimball Ave. Roanoke, VA 24016 Page 5 of 10 The governing body of each Locality Member shall be empowered to remove, at any time, without cause, the Individual Member appointed by it and appoint a successor Individual Member to fill the unexpired portion of the removed Member's term. Vacancies on the Board shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as the appointment of the Individual Member being removed from or vacating the Board was made. Each Individual Member shall be reimbursed by the Authority for the amount of actual expenses in performance of duties as an Individual Member of the Authority. Each Individual Member of the Board shall have one equal vote in all matters before the Authority. Individual Members may resign at any time. ARTICLE IV PURPOSE The purpose of the Authority is to provide qualifying communication services as authorized by Article 5.1 (§ 56-484.7: 1 et seq.) of Chapter 15 of Title 56 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended and to provide such other services as provided by law and Chapter 54.1 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. Such services are to be provided to the geographic areas of the County of Roanoke, the County of Botetourt, the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, Virginia and to such other service areas as the Board may adopt from time to time to establish local governmental network(s) to meet the communication needs of Locality Members, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Carilion Clinic and their affiliates and subsidiaries and in accordance with the contracts and agreements by and between this Authority and other private or public entities as the Authority may agree in writing upon the terms and conditions established pursuant to such contracts. ARTICLE V POWERS, GENERAL OPERATIONS The Authority shall have all the powers granted by Section 15.2-5431.11 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The general business of the Authority, including the issuance of revenue bonds and refunding bonds as permitted by the Act and the expenditure of funds for general expenses, shall be conducted by the majority action of the Board of the Authority, provided such Board may create an executive committee and such other committees as the Board may direct, including project committees. The Authority is vested with the powers of a body corporate, including the power to sue and be sued in its own name, plead and be impleaded, and adopt and use a common seal and alter the same as may be deemed expedient. Page 6 of 10 ARTICLE VI DISSOLUTION The Board of the Authority may determine that the purposes for which the Authority was created have been completed, or are impractical or impossible to complete, and that all of the obligations have been paid, or have been assumed by one or more political subdivisions or any Authority created thereby, or that cash or United States government securities have been deposited for their payment. In such event, it shall adopt and file with each of the governing bodies a resolution declaring such facts. If the governing bodies adopt a resolution, concurring in such declaration and finding that the Authority should be dissolved, they shall file appropriate articles of dissolution with the State Corporation Commission. ARTICLE VII WITHDRAWAL OF LOCALITY A locality may withdraw from the Authority at any time, provided, that no locality may withdraw from the Authority at any time when bonds are outstanding unless all remaining members approve such withdrawal at such time. Prior to withdrawing, a locality shall provide the Authority and each of the other participating localities with written notice of the locality's intent to withdraw. In the event that a locality withdraws, such locality electing to withdraw shall execute all documents necessary to reflect such withdrawal, the remaining participating localities shall appoint a replacement member to the Board, and file proper amendments to these Articles with the State Corporation Commission. If any of the governing bodies of the remaining participating localities fails to act or are unable to act to appoint a replacement member within sixty (60) days after the locality electing to withdraw provides notice of withdrawal, then the appointment of the replacement member shall be made by the judges of the Circuit Court for the 23rd Judicial Circuit. ARTICLE VIII AUDIT The Authority shall cause an annual audit of its books and records to be made by the State Auditor of Public Accounts or by an independent certified public accountant at the end of each fiscal year and a certified copy thereof to be filed promptly with the governing bodies of each of the incorporating political subdivisions. Page 7 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and the City Council of the City of Salem, Virginia have caused these Articles of Incorporation to be executed in their respective names, and their respective seals have been affixed and attested by the respective clerks of each, this day of , Attest: Deborah C. Jacks, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board SEAL Approved as to Form: County Attorney Attest: Susan Fain, Deputy Clerk to the Board ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA la David F. Radford, Chairman Board of Supervisors BOTETOURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA IN Billy W. Martin, Sr., Chairman Board of Supervisors Page 8 of 10 SEAL Approved as to Form: County Attorney Attest: Cecelia F. McCoy, CMC, Clerk SEAL Approved as to Form: City Attorney CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By: Sherman P. Lea, Sr., Mayor Page 9 of 10 Attest: James Taliaferro, Clerk SEAL Approved as to Form: City Attorney CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA Renee F. Turk, Mayor [End form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation} NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by this Roanoke County Board of Supervisors that the Authority's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation are hereby approved by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and that the two new Citizen Members nominated by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Carilion Clinic are hereby confirmed. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approves the filing of the Authority's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Virginia State Corporation Commission. Page 10 of 10 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: July 28, 2020 Resolution adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia: incorporating the draft (dated March 5, 2020) Hollins Center Plan SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and adoption of a resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating the Hollins Center Plan into the Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Plan is a planning document that is general in nature and reflects the community's goals and visions of what the future might be. It is a blueprint for the future growth and development of the County over the next 20 years. It provides direction and guidance, for both the public and private sectors, in making decisions about land development, public services and resource protection. DISCUSSION: Since 2018, the Planning Commission and staff have developed an area plan in the Hollins area with ample public engagement and input. Over 880 people participated in the Plan's development over the past two years. The draft Hollins Center Plan study area is approximately 465 acres in size located near Hollins University covering Plantation Road from Williamson Road to Interstate 81 and Williamson Road from Hollins University to Peters Creek Road. Page 1 of 2 The draft Hollins Center Plan includes a Plan Summary which highlights the key components of the various sections of the Hollins Center Plan. More detailed information is included in the appendices which include the following sections: Introduction; Existing Conditions; Community Engagement; Vision and Principles; and Plan Implementation and Recommendations. The draft Hollins Center Plan provides an overall vision for a mixed-use, multi -modal area with recommendations on how to achieve this vision. Specific implementation strategies will need to be studied and evaluated prior to any actions taken by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. As this Plan is implemented over time, it will be necessary to review the Plan and its implementation strategies, and make revisions as needed to address changing conditions and any development impacts on existing public services. Keeping residents, businesses and the general public informed will also be critical as progress is made toward implementing this Plan. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to incorporate the draft Hollins Center Plan into the County's Comprehensive Plan on May 5, 2020. The County received public comments on the draft Plan through an online survey (March 6th through May 5th), email and phone calls. The Planning Commission recommends that the draft Hollins Center Plan be incorporated into the County's Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Supervisors held a work session on the draft Hollins Center Plan on July 14, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating the Hollins Center Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. Page 2 of 2 ■ IF ROANOKE COUNTY VA Draft Hollins Center Plan Summary - March 5, 2020 R im 0 0 03 °Q `o > o .5 o D E s o� > ° 0 0 `o o Q) o 0 D- O N o Q � 0 0 0 ° > 0 0 O O C C Q> °a D- E E o a 00 U °'D- 0 0 ° Q)E D- o o._ a a D- o 0 U -0.0 a - of �- �3 a'o 0 0 0 0� �`o 3� 3 E� oS-0. D- 0 0 oar D o o - N - 3 0 0 `o a o o °•S. 0`0 Q) C U � o O U S U O C C ° C D N N .� O ' 0 0� E '`o o o �� 0 a O O o� �E= oU o� Ngo ° 0 0C p 0 0 Q� 0 ° o'� a o 0 3 °.S o 3 0 0 oO ° E ° a° U o . ro 0- E `o U_ °= o >Q)Q) o 0 ap 0> o°>3 0Q 3 (�° O o °�' D- ° U3 Q) 2-6 0 Ewa � � Q.� � � 0 d � E E o � Q) a T ao o 0):6 Qo o a° O ��0 -Q> Nod o 0 0 o �0 0 - 0 3� > Q0 0 0 0 O T i o o O o o E 0 0 0�. .� - 0 Uo o o E y �� •� O O V O - 0`o o c Q aE E o > a ° � �- i E'o o a E 3 V o o 0 3� °' i° = o— T. C 0 E-0 o a 0� �-a p o o-0 � E a o O a 0 � �-0 Q > j C� o ° �C� o) N 0 a� E-0 � E D- �- ° E 080,E o, c aao Q) (D Q)>o c�o a EO N�o0 Q) >° °° 2° cam= '0 "oma XD- Cc) y.E° a3�0 0 0 = 0 . •O •U O O° N 'O 00 o E ° o o m `o '� o a o a 0 o 0 .S o o o '� N 0 Q) c w Q o o ��° �� u% o p a o� > U) o c- N E.S m��x •C N a V O 4) Q) °Q .N �°0 �` p C a°Q° O N O �.s y=�° oo )- _ ° •��� ��° c �� E 3� o E ° o� aQ a 0`a0� O o o.0 o E° Qo Qa U o o 0 a 7 0 E x 5 p 7 a Q 0 3 J O OU ii C S v� `�7i m C Q 0 C9va- U L �a � C o u o Uv 20 D- o N �'o Q p S �a E a E~ 3 O C 00 70 C O d � U N N N N N 0 7 ° U 7 Q0 i O)O CO C C C O L O U C O° O N '0 T 4°, O S U p =, 7 C 0•� 3 aU o BOE E U E ° E Q 0 U 0 C N N �- 0 E O C U S 4 0 C "D' -0 � N 70 >, ° >, E o •� O U 'C 4 O E U7 U N = >� E °' O 0 o O o - o O .Q QS Q� EQ N O O 0 o N 3'0 °'� o� 0- a 0 a0.,o a� �a o p Q N •C E O ° > 0 0 d 0. C >a0— E 00.0 N" � Z _ O 0 ° ° > Q U N 0 OQ) N O O (V Q_C 7 X 0 '� N o O �0c U g- 0 N O ' O O ,N U Z o N N U N O — U 0 0 a U 0 0 0 0 0 'VIII 0 o � C� t ti v a- U Z 0 0 a ®� 000aU°�, • '� � 5 � o a a �*>aU0 U E o o U E o N 0 a O w_ N w ei �.0 _ U O a � a a) 0 � 0 U a 0 � a a a = 0 a °°�o a 0 a o a 3 0 a o 3 Ta a 0 U o Qo o LL a a N– Q D U 6 0> a a) U a _ -- --.o o 0 Y�O —.0 ° 0 'o O 6E C3 a �o0Y0"a \ .F m a a .6 a OQoa 5 a G�o on 0 0 0 0 0 'VIII cq 0 m E Y u ° c S? m O sz � NC. Nay; ODL� s u IL ("9° Ac 04 u o �OC) 0 c DOR rD a •° c < L M w N N a ` ° N 0 N r N m a c OD m o CV ' 1` 3 m o W `/� 0 \ o U •E a o o Q 3 x c >,0 o 1E Z. 0_–00 0). 4a o E0a)o »0 a_ 0 o a T Q U a Q a 0 °oE �TNao' ,��o ID) D - E u OO va)OQ=a�a��°-�.0 o�uU a�`oa°3aw Eoa �oOEE=0—o NO 'oa).0 'o0Po 0 R s 0/�/r 11 –� Q�>��o�a o -uE aoa �-oo'> 0aa . U° a� a S U E Q�° a a� o a) o `a m�� 0 b 2 2�EUoa°>>0o aaa>p0E T as E o �a �0F0=� Roaa)x0�a>a-2 °oo�0 a)Do)o�aaa) 0o0u �0 �5 T) 0 �0 0a�'� t ti v U O of 7` C,)L0 ID US m E o o U E o N o ° E D- o 00Ya-o°ao 0 a a _ U O 0 � 0 U a Ei} a Ta a 0 U o Q D U 6 0> a a) U a _ -- 6 a° a a E �o0Y0"a \ .F m a a .6 a OQoa 5 a G�o on U D O a > > a U Z o a ai4 �` 0_=u �a0_o= 0 a Y .ti 0 0 x 0 o - a a o o U w :,o) a - 6.- a) 30 � wYNN 0 Q D 0. a • 0 0 Jo---� u E -a o 4 0 w wY 0 0 T 0� g a w-6 0`oa Y Y O J O oU 00 O `a f 86 C a U„ °- 0 t o z h�Ez°uv �a°3a�'>U0 cq 0 m E Y u ° c S? m O sz � NC. Nay; ODL� s u IL ("9° Ac 04 u o �OC) 0 c DOR rD a •° c < L M w N N a ` ° N 0 N r N m a c OD m o CV ' 1` 3 m o W `/� 0 \ o U •E a o o Q 3 x c >,0 o 1E Z. 0_–00 0). 4a o E0a)o »0 a_ 0 o a T Q U a Q a 0 °oE �TNao' ,��o ID) D - E u OO va)OQ=a�a��°-�.0 o�uU a�`oa°3aw Eoa �oOEE=0—o NO 'oa).0 'o0Po 0 R s 0/�/r 11 –� Q�>��o�a o -uE aoa �-oo'> 0aa . U° a� a S U E Q�° a a� o a) o `a m�� 0 b 2 2�EUoa°>>0o aaa>p0E T as E o �a �0F0=� Roaa)x0�a>a-2 °oo�0 a)Do)o�aaa) 0o0u �0 �5 T) 0 t ti v -� of 7` C,)L0 ID US m O o o ° E r _ U O cr)— Ei} a cq 0 m E Y u ° c S? m O sz � NC. Nay; ODL� s u IL ("9° Ac 04 u o �OC) 0 c DOR rD a •° c < L M w N N a ` ° N 0 N r N m a c OD m o CV ' 1` 3 m o W `/� 0 \ o U •E a o o Q 3 x c >,0 o 1E Z. 0_–00 0). 4a o E0a)o »0 a_ 0 o a T Q U a Q a 0 °oE �TNao' ,��o ID) D - E u OO va)OQ=a�a��°-�.0 o�uU a�`oa°3aw Eoa �oOEE=0—o NO 'oa).0 'o0Po 0 R s 0/�/r 11 –� Q�>��o�a o -uE aoa �-oo'> 0aa . U° a� a S U E Q�° a a� o a) o `a m�� 0 b 2 2�EUoa°>>0o aaa>p0E T as E o �a �0F0=� Roaa)x0�a>a-2 °oo�0 a)Do)o�aaa) 0o0u �0 �5 LJ a o� a� � a a • 0 a a o a N T a�Q�� Mm- �a _ *, oEo �o Eo- � E oo � o• sao5; E O N o�,zO�a�op�a C 0 C C a p -.0-00. 6 o Y a 0 0 E o a p a�� m�0 a o oo `0 SY as -=ate 5 U a ��o°'c 0 o—, `0 -a�o2U 0 a s E° 3 T a j�a�aQ2-oa0s v 00- � U�aY�- o�OaQaEaa�3��.�vi OU0 ��oM as����a�aE 'o 00:9 " a = a)20u0_o U E E ... U F_ O z° 'muaoa� n� V o o o so o 2) E o E° O N '] . O 0 o w f LJ v - f a o� a� � a a 0 0000 0 a a o a N T as a ` e.. � E oo a) aE�aaaa��,Qa E O N u Q 0 oN o Y a 0 0 E o a ¢¢aa TO o oo `0 0o �E3a-0oa-ao `o a ��o°'c 0 o—, `0 o 0 a s E° 3 T a 6oQ°-a v a0u • u O n m> n o�OaQaEaa�3��.�vi OU0 ��oM " 3 a N -p oma• a�. z° 'muaoa� a o o o so o 2) E o E° O N '] . O 0 f 0 o��� a�� Q a x a a 6 m1) a> O p E EO _S a O e o CS seq� oE• 0_� a�°ja�0a�oa N Q U N 0 0 U O a a) O N N a T •� E Q a 4 a • ` 00 i �IIII M N U v - f a o� a� � a a 0 0000 °0 T as i e.. � E oo E 5 E x E O N u Q 0 oN ¢¢aa TO o oo `0 uo _u a ��o°'c 0 o—, `0 o �•ooa�, 6oQ°-a v a0u • u O n m> n N • Q U u z° 'muaoa� o �o n v'O c • E 5 oa p T 4 a • ` 00 i �IIII M N U K 0 `0 c n or v U � o� a� � a a 0 0000 °0 T as a a a a o a o E- o E 5 E x E O N u Q 0 oN ¢¢aa TO o oo `0 0 a oYmOg a ��o°'c 0 o—, `0 �aOYa �•ooa�, 6oQ°-a _ oma . � a a0u a o a ' E o i° a j? ° 0aoa z° 'muaoa� 0 `0 c n or v U � a _d f i • a N > ,0 0 0 � a aTi w a� E -a a E N a i oa�p- `O a 0-0,0 a E E N N a i a"a0 Qaa��°0 a E D a i 00aacoi>a)>a i m= Ea a 0 0 0 a= 0 41 0,T0 a-0� o�� x 0E06 >a00°o° ao)0•� D �t �aa�sio°) i O'er 0 s° o f a 0 aDa��a)a i 0 o aE3�oUpa C7° 0,000- a�°aaai2) C� T Op o U0 �p)Ma`o Ea aEa)O�Q�°� o Q a aa X 0 0 a p O > 0 o a 3 a � 0 = � a N pao Qa'>o Da NUa E-Oa) m 3 a -E 00 E o a a o'0a3o m a P a -_ 0 ° mEa�aa)aai��uT OREQaE Do �� i a a) ro D- 0 C a O N a a a Q 0 O = L 0 0 3'a a �• oa'0 Qa'ua=v a o 3 ro > In a) E a) O a a 0 p — O O O W N 0 � � U N c a s a � `pa's oQa 0 S 0 o F- a 0 III u t, � �0ro' Y° 0 0 203 . �LLoa a i,o 0-0 0 •� o � o N o a a O E 'o ozo s>0a3 a-) a) ,-=.-, 0„a o 3' .� = Q' E 0, 0 T o° U ooLL0Y0�0 p)a00 i -° 0-05 0oYNaaoa'=` 0-00 D- o N=aa)•pa'EuEsEOs0)0 0— -a• --a s�a0oo. a '0aa) a p aQ 0a Na) aO E o3 a0;E:5 -0 .. Lp�o��a->a)a� _0E0 i EO a> a -E 3:,6 a aa) s 0. 00 E u U EOE a) Q f a) o Z-)- oYETo��E°aa�0=_ p a4 -0 a=' 0 = 'p �_ ID) 0 T° `a 0 0° a E° E a0 T Q o> a 3= a a o o E 000E00 a> O.E 'paEoa��a i,mc-o��a� a�oa3�Qga�� a1NNPp�C�' �M�oo>j ao-p�OT�a)N� s Y a) 0 0> o a) _ 'o a> N p 2 D- o 0 Q O O a) a) a • -a ] OaLL U aaQ0E Q aa)'O Y> Ol mU o c f} IF W \ a1 c y w e zzT".I g �� O U Q i •�0 ao`aa°) •iiii•ii E o aoQ EDaD l�ssa„`aU3ao) as�'% aQ==N a3(D 0aoo°- Uo�00_ _•a •=��a 0 0aE6o o0 o- g.o 'vmE3aaN�3 E iY � �° NEE -�.Ea 3p-- ua0 D- � oU 0 0 E20 OQao0a i a a) ro D- 0 C a O N a a a Q 0 O = L 0 0 3'a a �• oa'0 Qa'ua=v a o 3 ro > In a) E a) O a a 0 p — O O O W N 0 � � U N c a s a � `pa's oQa 0 S 0 o F- a 0 III u t, � �0ro' Y° 0 0 203 . �LLoa a i,o 0-0 0 •� o � o N o a a O E 'o ozo s>0a3 a-) a) ,-=.-, 0„a o 3' .� = Q' E 0, 0 T o° U ooLL0Y0�0 p)a00 i -° 0-05 0oYNaaoa'=` 0-00 D- o N=aa)•pa'EuEsEOs0)0 0— -a• --a s�a0oo. a '0aa) a p aQ 0a Na) aO E o3 a0;E:5 -0 .. Lp�o��a->a)a� _0E0 i EO a> a -E 3:,6 a aa) s 0. 00 E u U EOE a) Q f a) o Z-)- oYETo��E°aa�0=_ p a4 -0 a=' 0 = 'p �_ ID) 0 T° `a 0 0° a E° E a0 T Q o> a 3= a a o o E 000E00 a> O.E 'paEoa��a i,mc-o��a� a�oa3�Qga�� a1NNPp�C�' �M�oo>j ao-p�OT�a)N� s Y a) 0 0> o a) _ 'o a> N p 2 D- o 0 Q O O a) a) a • -a ] OaLL U aaQ0E Q aa)'O Y> Ol mU o c f} IF W \ a1 c y w e zzT".I g �� Y o.-� -° a) a0 `oa•�a o c0i°)a)0o-oo No: D a N •� 0 a o 0 F_a�30 •a - 0 o�aaaQ�Q u a° o o Q a 0- a)¢ �,aa°�a)aa 0 a o o a o u >aa Qa >) a2 as a) Y° E a) a) 0 a `a a o E a `o a) E a a a s D a o E� 0 a) aa) a)� Q o a `a E 1) ° °E a ��"o ' oc° % r t.- s ro =?'�,. � t �� • 'moi, E L J; O d3 n 1>1 � o Y � ID ° a x 0 'O - O G c N y c m 0'D m m Y• a o o Z a) d • � O C Q1 O N a 6 o 5 . N � 1 �. •). r tai?' � - t5 c ami -o .c _ .�' � ° a f5- 3 N t K' .( a Cl l C Zm c i E > ID C E C C CC 0 N a N C vi t a) 0 O m -gyp 0 '�r¢cn� o'v�U ID cm Q - _ § f` 2{¥ _ -\a |! - )/2 _ \) {\\�G (� E E� ®: _t|{\[\ \\} \ : _ 7\) !f{w [§[ e _§§/\B m_ KD \\\�C: _ C: _ \\\ \\(\ \{\ \\j \/\ 7k®/\ af/ c \\ u CD \)§\ {�§ -:\(ƒ}\ x `4 - J ))}{ d[S u��� ID cm cm \\ _ § f` 2{¥ _ -\a |! - )/2 _ \) {\\�G §/ E (\{ ®: _t|{\[\ \\} \ : �P/\ 7\) {§/ - eoa. \2 _§§/\B m_ \\\�C: u\(> C: _ \\\ \(E2 - -/ -\ \\\j | ; \\ u -y) -:\(ƒ}\ x `4 - G 0 \\\(D u��� moo; o = F �o ID cm cm \\ �k 4OE } \ Z3 7k -\a 1 - E E \) C, (��� �( { ; ®: 0 7\) ° X0 \2 \�~ \\!\ _ \\\\ \\\ \0 - -/ -\ \\\j | \\ u §}\ -:\(ƒ}\ x `4 - G \ ID cm \\ �k Z3 7k )�- 0CD - ' ))))\ _ {$ 7\) \9 X0 /ƒ\\} \\!\ _ -\ \\\j \)§ \\ §}\ )j{ \\\ u��� moo; u=_ �:_ �o {»»; \2f 0 //\+j(/j ;\LL b G :\;f/-`» - ;§[»� _ u _ /\ \ -0 E0 e u : ° %{°y2/��� ■■■� \.UO\ \ . _|§\ 2 {{{ y f;( - Eke° !{{ « E {i\{ _ - !��§ ® ® - 2 §!;a - .)I:,/ { { _ a >3{§w -- { ! \f ) _ -#-t ci Glflf { (| k `t` r*;\�;\-) , ]K 7ltF# {§/{f)!3}2 . } ,® 3: u> �- a5�3 \�\\| 2 !#\#f ! ,.a,,. \� 2 | � � ■ E t® OE o \ § § � | [ ■ ( � { � ■ 2 � f 0 a= / 7 ). •��, < § ° %{°y2/��� ■■■� \.UO\ \ . _|§\ 2 {{{ y f;( - Eke° !{{ « E {i\{ _ - !��§ ® ® - 2 §!;a - .)I:,/ { { _ a >3{§w -- { ! \f ) _ -#-t ci Glflf { (| k `t` r*;\�;\-) , ]K 7ltF# {§/{f)!3}2 . } ,® 3: u> �- a5�3 \�\\| 2 !#\#f ! ,.a,,. 2 | } � � f 0 2 - < § a 08. LU k ;- , E 3: § _ cc 8 E - - _( o m U _ \ k k> k $ > - t § ! ;| \ 00. \ k \ \� 00. 3 k ) !{ ! ! ° %{°y2/��� ■■■� \.UO\ \ . _|§\ 2 {{{ y f;( - Eke° !{{ « E {i\{ _ - !��§ ® ® - 2 §!;a - .)I:,/ { { _ a >3{§w -- { ! \f ) _ -#-t ci Glflf { (| k `t` r*;\�;\-) , ]K 7ltF# {§/{f)!3}2 . } ,® 3: u> �- a5�3 \�\\| 2 !#\#f ! ,.a,,. OCA Kt 0 T O 0 O u a� 03 u o v O O c o 0 ° v a c o 0 0 o —_ ~ c � 3 v 0 Q Q ° EE > > U 4 O o U O O U > Z a z° v 2 W ° • 44 0 oo ` U 'O L •c c O ° ai L u W 60 Kw a W O O C 0 c _ c v • a Y c O 4 - -a° � V a • 3 v — o m m o o W o c - =L o O O C C T — O O 3 OI c W c c o 0 Off U O O v W U p O • c Z O U O O O x E E 3 U 0 a D E E o _ a t[F� w � UU o C L�' _ a v a o tr $ ° ° _ Q � t A U T `o 0 m v v E �`m c '0 w w °u c 'O Z v o m a a u U ° p 0.0 'O 'O ° � t c p L c c c c W c O O O O O _ v • m � .°�° u L LL �uu'0 Ig = = U a c W a s a E T v O o u u u v o 0 w u'Ev 0 0 . . . u0 E a U'o c c c 2 c u 13 Ep_ azo U U U c. c • O E O p N O O U O U D► FL Z ' _ W y0 0 U .. w o LU x ±*od #f r F ' 0 �'.{. 1 y. I O _ is NOSVVVI 10 W �C lti Y ` O iti CL c _ c O O �,•, �u 'O In W O w � ' O o O U1 !tr , www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov/Hollins www.Facebook.com/RoCoPlanning www.Twitter.com/RoanokeCounty Draft Hollins Center Plan Summary Draft Hollins Center Plan - March 5, 2020 AltROANOKE gil COUNTY VA TABLE OF CONTENTS Hollins CENTER Page Appendix 1: Introduction 1-1 Appendix 2: Existing Conditions Study Area 2-1 Land Use/Housing 2-7 Environment 2-15 Community Facilities and Infrastructure 2-20 Appendix 3: Community Engagement Engagement Activities 3-1 Engagement Results 3-11 Public Hearings and Adoption 3-17 Appendix 4: Vision and Principles 4-1 Appendix 5: Plan Recommendations and Implementation Strategies 5-1 Appendix 1. Introduction In early 2016, Planning and Economic Development staff identified several centers throughout the County that were appropriate for new commercial and residential redevelopment or infill development. These activity centers present opportunities for investment that will improve their economic viability, aesthetics and value. The Hollins Center study area was chosen for its proximity to Interstate 81 and Hollins University, the highest concentration of employment in the County, as well as for multiple redevelopment opportunities. Plantation Road commercial corridor The Hollins Center study area is approximately 465 acres stretching from Williamson Road, Peters Creek Road and Plantation Road up to Interstate 81. The study area has a variety of businesses that include large employers (Wells Fargo, Elbit Systems of America and Double Envelope), regional shopping retailers (camping, recreational vehicle sales and services, hardware), local commercial (hotels, restaurants, grocery, pharmacy, auto sales and services), office uses (insurance, financial services) any many local industrial businesses. INTRODUCTION Hollins CENTER The Hollins Center Plan started in 2018 and was developed with ample public engagement and input over the past two years. Over 880 people participated in the Plan's development. The Hollins Center Plan will guide future decisions and actions in the Hollins area. Implementation of this Plan will be completed over the next 20 years. �Tr . Williamson Road and Plantation Road intersection Hollins INTRODUCTION CENTER Relationshir) to the Comprehensive Plan The Commonwealth of Virginia requires that every locality adopt a Comprehensive Plan for "guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted and harmonious development of the territory ... which will best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of the inhabitants" (Code of Virginia 15.2-2223) . Roanoke County's Comprehensive Plan states that it "is a blueprint for the future growth and development of the County over the next 10-15 years. It provides direction and guidance for both the public and private sectors in making decisions about land development, public services and resource protection. The Plan allows decision makers to study the long-term consequences of current decisions and recognize that today's actions will impact the County for many years to come." COMMl11VITY MEETINGS SafurtlaY. March 3 q ThuradnY MWI oc �•rTl, - j2 P.m. , 4 p.rn. - 7 P n,. Y'IYII µy;w kq°cCx hPYbll llbroi A community �xiYA�4fI0lflk�^C Ponake, Y4 }�Oi9 Y meeting- Hollins Library The Hollins Center Plan, which is proposed to be adopted into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, will aid decision making for future development in the Hollins Center study area. This Plan is one in a series of area, corridor and community Draft Plan Reveal participants sharing feedback planning studies that aim to provide detailed, area -specific analyses and recommendations for the areas in which they are conducted. Implementation The Hollins Center Plan will be implemented over the next 20 -plus years. Successful implementation depends on the necessary regulatory tools, continued community engagement and appropriate financing policies that can encourage and guide private development along with strategic public investment. This Plan provides an overall vision with recommendations on how to achieve this vision. Specific implementation strategies will need to be studied and evaluated prior to any actions taken by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. It will be necessary to review this Plan and its implementation strategies over time and make any revisions as needed to address changing conditions and any development impacts on existing public services. As progress is made on implementing this Plan, it will be critical to keep residents, businesses and the general public informed. Conceptual Renderinas The Hollins Center Plan includes numerous conceptual renderings that illustrate development and architectural types. These renderings seek to convey the ideas and concepts collected via community engagement strategies. The conceptual renderings represent possibilities; they do not prescribe specific development. Development will happen over time, driven by private investment and economic and environmental realities. Staff will work with property owners, businesses and INTRODUCTION Hollins CENTER developers to incorporate recommended design principles, elements and concepts into each project. Plan Structure The Hollins Center Plan is divided into several sections (appendices) covering a different aspect of the plan and/or its development. Following this Introduction (Appendix 1) is a section on Existing Conditions (Appendix 2). Existing conditions provides information about the study area, its population and demographics, current and future land uses, zoning and redevelopment opportunities. This section also discusses historic and cultural resources, natural resources, community facilities, the transportation network and infrastructure. View of nearby Read Mountain from Interstate 87 Community Engagement (Appendix 3) covers the range of public engagement activities that were conducted during the planning process. This section also shows the amount and results of public input and stakeholder feedback received. Appendix 4 contains the Plan's Vision and Principles. This section provides a vision and four main principles derived from the extensive community engagement. This section sets Hollins INTRODUCTION" CENTER the foundation for the plan recommendations and implementation strategies. The Plan's implementation and recommendations are detailed in Appendix 5. Recommendations include future policy actions as well as physical infrastructure wants and needs. The recommendations are derived from public input and aim to provide a structure for implementation strategies that will serve the health, safety, prosperity and welfare of the community over the next 10 - 20 years. Preceding the appendices is a Plan Summary that highlights the key components of the various sections of the Plan. The Summary is provided in an easy - to -read format with many graphics, maps, tables and charts. Map 2-1 WVWA CARVINS COVE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Fx1T EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER STUDY AREA fif... ' TINKER CREEK Rf1r B GREENWAY lf1i 0 p HOLLINS TRAILHEAD � ��1 AT 'P p 31 � r0 P IPI NO •rrrrC �e lrrrrrrrff �N C, - R,,.. T y 'rr,r f' rlflf WALROND ENVELOPE y� 1 PARK O HOLLYWOOD'S FIRE & RESCUE eQ STATION 115 HOLLINS �RF/V3 LIBRARY KROGER A BURLINGTON S ELEMENTARY �Z 7 �O Q V 3 FY December 2019 0 250 500 1,000 Feet N Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER STUDY AREA Appendix 2. Existing Conditions Study Area Location, Context and Boundary The Hollins Center study area is located in the northeast portion of Roanoke County, adjacent to Interstate 81 (Exit 146) near the Botetourt County boundary. It is roughly bounded by Interstate 81 to the north, Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road to the south, Hollins University to the east, and residential neighborhoods and Walrond Park to the west. Plantation Road splits the study area approximately in half. The study area encompasses over 270 parcels totaling approximately 465 acres and includes residential, commercial and industrial uses. The Hollins Magisterial District has the highest population density in Roanoke County. View of the Hollins Center from Tinker Mountain n Exit 141 xifE `r City of Salem y, Roanoke County, Map 2-2 Exif T 50 �Exii•I4b~�� Boiefourt County 0 10,000 20,000 Feet Hollins Community Welcome Sign Population and Demographics Figure 2-3 Virginia 2017 Population by Age 85+ 75 to84 i 65 to 74 55 to 64 Q 45 to 54 35 to44 25 to 34 20 to 24 15 to 19 0 to 14 5to9 Under 5 14% G% 2% 47 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2017 Estimates Percent of Total Population Figure 2-4 Roanoke County 2017 Population by Age 85+ 75 to 84 - 65 to 74 55 to 64. 45 to 54 Q 35 to 44 0 25 to 34 20 to 24 p 15 to 19 Q 10 to 14 5to9 Under 5 0% 27. 47. 6% Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2017 Estimates Figure 2-5 14.3% 14.1% 8% 10% T2% 14% 16% Percent of Total Population 1.5 Mile Radius 2018 Population by Age e5+ 75 to 84 65 to 74 a 55 to 64 i 0 45 to 54 (� 35 to 44 = 0 25 to 34 Q 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5to9 Under 5 0% 5% 10% Source: U.S. Census Bureau & Esri Forecasts 14.9% 15'/. 20% Percent of Total Population EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER STUDY AREA The nation's current young adult generations are soon expected to surpass older generations in size as they decline. In addition, younger generation numbers continue to grow due to immigration. In Virginia, where the state's largest age group was age 25 to 34 in 2017, younger adult populations have begun to outnumber the population of residents approaching retirement (see Figure 2-3). However, those approaching retirement age make up the largest population in Roanoke County, resulting in an aging population countywide (see Figure 2-4). There are few differences in population age trends in Hollins versus Roanoke County except for the 20 to 24 age group, which is 8% in Hollins and 5.6% countywide. This difference may be attributed to the student population at Hollins University (see Figure 2-5). Total population in the Hollins area increased by less than two percent from 2010 to 2018, while the median age increased by two years to 44.8. Hollins University students Source: Hollins.edu L] Hollins CENTER Figure 2-6 EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY AREA 1322 l 2010-2017 Roanoke County Total Population Change Source: U.S. Census Bureau In keeping with national trends, Roanoke County's population growth in the last seven years was attributed to new population emigrating from foreign countries, while the rest migrated here from other localities in Virginia or from other states. Deaths exceeded births, resulting in a natural decrease in population (see Figure 2-6) . Figure 2-7 41M2& * . 33 average household sine EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER STUDY AREA 4 WK Z� arr Epfelour# Counly 8,435 to" County A 0,rf 146 residents In x,389 �+ households ] $31,410 per capita Income 2,522 owner occupied units i $73,434 average househ V% income 867 82.8% renter occupied White. 9.3 Bla units 4.4% Asian Hollins Center Demographics within a 1.5 mile radius from Elbit Systems of America; 2018 Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS r_ ENTER STUDY AREA To compare the demographics for both Figure 2-8 Hollins and Roanoke County (see Figures lllll� 2-7 and 2-8): • The percentage of owner -occupied and renter -occupied households is the same with 74% owner -occupied, and 26% renter -occupied. • Average household size is also essentially the same with 2.34 for the County and 2.33 for Hollins. • Median age in Hollins is 44.8, only 0.6 years higher than the County median age. • Hollins and Roanoke County are both predominately white at 83% and 89%, respectively. • Hollins has nominally higher diversity with 9% Black and 4% Asian populations, as compared to 6% Black and 3% Asian populations countywide. • Per capita and household incomes are higher countywide at $32,220 and $77,347, respectively. In Hollins they are $31,410 and $73,437. .a 2.34 average household size 94,031 residents in 38,322 households i 28,492: 74% owner -occupied units 9,830: 26% renter -occupied units $32,220 per capita income $77,347 average household income 44.3 median age 89% White 6% Black, 3% Asian, 2% Other Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2016 ACS 5 -year estimates "Household income considers the incomes of all people ages 15 years or older occupying the same housing unit, regardless of relation. Per capita income measures the average income earned by each person in a given area. Therefore, two income earners in the same family or household are counted separately when measuring per capita income." Investopedia.com Source: Moz.com Source: miaminewluxury.condos EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins LAND USE AND HOUSING h N Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS r_ ENTER LAND USE AND HOUSING Land Use and Housing Existina Land Use Williamson and Peters Creek Roads Existing land use refers to the current use of a parcel of land. The commercial areas along Williamson Road are characterized by single -story buildings with parking in front, strip shopping centers, frequent curb cuts, and drive-through restaurants. The northern end of the Plantation Road corridor near Interstate 81 is developed with businesses primarily serving highway travelers such as restaurants, hotels, and gas stations. Roanoke County's largest employment base is located farther south on Plantation Road. Two manufacturing facilities, Double Envelope and Elbit Systems of America, along with a Wells Fargo call center, are situated at the intersection of Plantation Road and Lila Drive. There are also many small scale industrial operations thriving in the Plantation Road area. Many locally owned businesses line Williamson Road, serving the community as well as travelers. Hollins University Apartments are located in the study area across Williamson Road from Hollins University. Williamson Road. Tinker Mountain Of the total 465 acres in the Hollins Center study area, agricultural/vacant are the largest cumulative land uses, accounting for 35.6% of the study area. Industrial establishments account for 16.6% of the study area, and commercial establishments make up 29.7%. Residential uses include 15.7% as single-family homes, and 2.2% as multi -family duplex and triplex. Churches and cemeteries make up 0.20 of the study area (see Figure 2-10) . Figure 2-10 Existing Land Use Percent of Total Area Church, _cemetery, Mortuary 0.2% Industrial 16.7% Agricultural/ Vacant 35.6% Multi -Family Single -Family Residential Residential 2.37. �` 15.7% I HQLLJNS CENTER PLAN - DRAFT Surrounding Neighborhoods The commercial corridors of the Hollins Center study area are adjacent to residential neighborhoods and Hollins University. The Hollins Center study area is surrounded primarily by single-family neighborhoods built between 1950 and 1980. Multi -family and infill subdivisions were built on undeveloped parcels between 1980 and 2015. There are a few multi -family developments in the area. Townhomes on Stonelyn Cottage Court and Peters Creek Apartments are located just outside the study area boundary (see Map 2-11). A single-family home in the Hollins area Source: realtor.com L_= EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER LAND USE AND HOUSING . Botetourt County Hollins { r UnFversFly r r r r ,arrmenrs s f t ~ + y .0 Mountain View] Roanoke; FiFFFs � 1 County Q 2.500 5,000 Feet Peters Creek Apartments Source: apartments.com Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS \LATER LAND USE AND HOUSING Zoning The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is part of the Roanoke County Code. The official zoning map identifies zoning designations for every property in the County. Together, the zoning ordinance and map regulate what kinds of uses are permitted on a property as well as structure location and size, and other site development characteristics. The Hollins Center Zoning Map 2-12 and Figure 2-13 illustrate zoning designations in the study area. Figure 2-13 Zoning Districts Percent of Total Area R-2 C-1 17. 1% R-3 5% R-1 17% I-2 c-2 27. 45%a I-1 29% Collectively, C-1 and C-2 commercial districts and 1-1 and 1-2 industrial districts dominate the study area, making up 46% and 31% of the properties, respectively. The length of Williamson Road, as well as the northern end of Plantation Road near Interstate 81, are lined on both sides by C-2 High Intensity Commercial zoning. C-2 includes a wide variety of retail and service -related uses. 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial includes less intensive industrial activities and employment centers, while EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins LAND USE AND HOUSING CENTER 1-2 High Intensity Industrial includes more intensive industrial uses. 1-1 and 1-2 zones are located in the middle of the study area along Plantation Road and along Interstate 81. Residentially -zoned properties make up 23% of the study area. There are several areas west of Plantation Road, south of Interstate 81, and adjacent to Hollins University that are currently zoned R-1 and R-2. R-1 Low Density Residential includes primarily single-family detached homes, while R-2 Medium Density Residential allows single-family attached and detached homes. There are four parcels zoned R-3 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, which permits single-family attached homes, townhomes, and multi- family homes. One of these R-3 parcels fronts on Williamson Road and is owned by Hollins University. The property is currently used for student apartments. The other three parcels are located south of Milk -A - Way Drive and north of Williamson Road. The Hollins Center study area includes 150 total acres (approximately 32% of the study area) of potentially developable agricultural and vacant land in the study area. Nearly 63 total acres are zoned C-2 High Intensity Commercial, 45.4 total acres are zoned 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial, and 30.4 total acres are zoned R-1 Low Density Residential. 9 total acres are zoned R-3 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential, 2 total acres are zoned C-1 Low Intensity Commercial, and 0.4 acre is zoned R-2 Medium Density Residential (see Figure 2-14) . Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER LAND USE AND HOUSING Figure 2-14 Zoning of Agricultural and Vacant Parcels R-1 R-2 I-1 20%'0 <1 % 30.070 R-3 +6°7011 C-1 C-2 1.3%'0 42°7"0 IF Non -conforming land use refers to uses that were allowed under previous zoning regulations but are no longer allowed by the current zoning regulations. There are several non -conforming uses in the study area including a mobile home park near the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Williamson Road, several single-family homes on Plantation Road and agricultural uses adjacent to Hollins University. Figure 2-15 R-1 Low Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-3 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential ■ C-2 High Intensity Commercial C-1 Low Intensity Commercial 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial Of the total 465 acres in the Hollins Center study area, 61 acres, or 13%, are currently non -conforming uses. The largest non- conforming use type is agriculture, which is located on parcels zoned R-1 Low Density Residential. There are numerous residential uses occurring on parcels zoned for 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial and C-2 High Intensity Commercial (see Figure 2-15). These properties are allowed to have more intensive uses by current zoning than exist at this time. wr I Non -conforming Use IL - Non -Conforming Uses @JW Zoning Parcels 3k M Acres Percent TotallNon- conforming - - nt of StudyArea ..- Acreage -.0. -1 Agriculture Agricult R-1 Low Density Residential 5 43.61 72% 9% Single-family home C-2 High Intensity Commercial 13 9.72 16% 2% Manufactured homes C-2 High Intensity Commercial 1 5.43 9% 1% Single-family home I-1 Low Intensity Industrial 1 1.97 3% <1% Totals 20 60.73 100% 13% EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins LAND USE AND HOUSING \LATER Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER LAND USE AND HOUSING Future Land Use Vacant Properties on Williamson Road The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan includes a Future Land Use Guide and Map. The Guide serves as a reference and policy framework for citizens and policy makers for how the County should develop, and is used for evaluation of requested zoning amendments. Figure 2-17 • High intensity urban development encouraged. • Parallel to business districts in Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. • Appropriate for highway - oriented retail and regional shopping facilities. Land Use Types ❖ General Retail and Personal Services ❖ Office and Institutional ❖ Limited Industrial The Hollins Center Future Land Use Map (see Map 2-16) shows that the study area has three main designations: Core, Principal Industrial and Transition. Core comprises 57% of the study area, Principal Industrial 26%, and Transition 17%. Figure 2- 17 provides additional information regarding these designations. • A variety of industry types are encouraged. • Regional employment centers convenient to residential areas and suitable highway access. Land Use Types ❖ Industrial Parks ❖ Freestanding Industrial ❖ Small Industries/Custom Manufacturing ❖ Mining and Extraction ❖ Agricultural Industries • Orderly development of highway frontage parcels. • Buffers between highways and nearby lower intensity development. • Office, institutional and small- scale coordinated retail. Land Use Types ❖ Office and Institutional Retail ❖ Multifamily Residential ❖ Single -Family Attached Residential Parks EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins ENVIRONMENT \LATER Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER ENVIRONMENT Environment Historic and Cultural Resources The Huffman Farm, Hollins University, Carvins Cove Sources: Roanoke County Economic Development, Hollins University, Western Virginia Water Authority The history of the Hollins community is characterized by agriculture, education, water and transportation. Early settlers in Roanoke County were Scots -Irish and German immigrants who displaced American Indian tribes, establishing an agrarian economy on the relatively flat land with ample water supply. In the 1930s wheat fields, livestock, and dairy farms dominated the Hollins area. The area takes its name from Mr. and Mrs John Hollins of Lynchburg, the first donors E t 1• sS` to Hollins Institute, now named Hollins University. The University's campus was originally a mineral springs resort named Botetourt Springs. The property began first transitioning to an educational use in 1839 and remains a thriving university today. The Hollins College Quadrangle is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Although Hollins is home to the County's largest employment center, there are still remnants of Hollins' agricultural history in the study area. The Huffman farm is comprised of several parcels totaling about 60 acres. Family members raise cattle and cut hay on the farm. The a t r L The Huffman Farm, Hollins University, Carvins Cove Sources: Roanoke County Economic Development, Hollins University, Western Virginia Water Authority The history of the Hollins community is characterized by agriculture, education, water and transportation. Early settlers in Roanoke County were Scots -Irish and German immigrants who displaced American Indian tribes, establishing an agrarian economy on the relatively flat land with ample water supply. In the 1930s wheat fields, livestock, and dairy farms dominated the Hollins area. The area takes its name from Mr. and Mrs John Hollins of Lynchburg, the first donors E t 1• sS` to Hollins Institute, now named Hollins University. The University's campus was originally a mineral springs resort named Botetourt Springs. The property began first transitioning to an educational use in 1839 and remains a thriving university today. The Hollins College Quadrangle is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Although Hollins is home to the County's largest employment center, there are still remnants of Hollins' agricultural history in the study area. The Huffman farm is comprised of several parcels totaling about 60 acres. Family members raise cattle and cut hay on the farm. The original Huffman farmhouse was identified in a 1992 Virginia Department of Historic Resources survey, and sits at the edge of the farm at 7790 Lila Drive. A tombstone listed on the National Register of Historic Places remains in the Old Tombstone Cemetery on Plantation Drive (see Map 2-18). Additional sites identified by the 1992 Virginia Department of Historic Resources survey include two homes located near the study area at 6615 and 6621 Peters Creek Road, several structures on Williamson Road, and the Hollins University campus adjacent to the study area. The remnants of the Green Ridge Baptist Church and Cemetery are located near the intersection of Plantation Road and Milk -A -Way Drive. The church had a cultural affiliation with African-American and Euro -American populations, and operated during the second half of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century. Interstate 81 near Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER ENVIRONMENT .00 Beginning with the Great Wagon Road, a major pioneer route, Hollins has long been an important transportation corridor. The Great Wagon Road became Williamson Road/Route 11, an early macadam -paved road which still operates as a regional and interstate corridor as well as a detour route for Interstate 81. With development of the railroad in 1852, the Hollins railroad station became a busy station for both passengers and for shipping agricultural products and livestock. Over the decades, growth spread from the City of Roanoke north to Hollins, with a gradual conversion of large agricultural lands to suburban and urban developments. The transition from rural to suburban development patterns was hastened by the construction of Interstate 81 between the 1950s and 1970s. During this time several large industries located on Plantation Road, while Williamson Road developed into a commercial corridor. By 1979, Hollins had transformed from a Williamson Road/Route 1 1 Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER ENVIRONMENT sparsely populated agricultural area to a suburban community with residential subdivisions and commercial establishments arranged along major roads. Development followed the same auto -centric pattern in subsequent decades. Natural Resources The Roanoke Valley is located in the Blue Ridge Mountains, in the Valley and Ridge geographical regions of Virginia. Natural resources exist in the form of mountains, forests, caves, rivers and streams, fertile soils, and four distinct seasons. The mountains and forests provide scenic vistas and an abundance of outdoor recreation opportunities. A wide variety of aquatic life thrives in the cool, well -oxygenated water, including Trout and the Roanoke Logperch, an endangered species identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Roanoke River originates in the Jefferson National Forest in Virginia's western mountain highlands, flowing east through Montgomery, Roanoke, Bedford and Franklin Counties, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton, through Southside Virginia, into North Carolina, to the Albemarle Sound and the Atlantic Ocean. The Roanoke Valley was carved by the Roanoke River between the parallel ridges of the Allegheny and Blue Ridge Mountains, resulting in a beautifully scenic, fertile valley ringed by mountains. The geographic location of Hollins affords scenic views of these surrounding mountains, adding significant character to the area. The Roanoke River enters Roanoke County in Glenvar, and picks up many short and steep tributaries as it traverses the Valley. The river is constricted naturally by mountainous topography and also by manmade structures such as bridges, rail embankments, and other floodplain development along the river's route. These characteristics can result in flash flooding and flood damage. Carvins Cove, named after the earliest settler in the Hollins area, William Carvin, is nestled around the base of Brushy Mountain to the north of the study area. Carvins Cove Natural Reserve and Reservoir function as one of the Roanoke Valley's water sources and simultaneously as the second largest municipal park in the nation. 11,363 acres of the reserve are protected by the largest conservation easement in Virginia's history. The City of Roanoke -owned park contains more than 12,000 acres of hardwood and mixed pine forests, a 630 -acre reservoir managed by the Western Virginia Water Authority and 60 miles of trails for hiking, mountain biking and horseback riding. Roanoke County provides emergency services for Carvins Cove, which is located in both Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. The Hollins Center area is relatively flat, with its main source of surface water being Carvin Creek (see Map 2-18). 95 percent of the area's water flows to Carvin Creek, which flows into Tinker Creek and ultimately to the Roanoke River. Flooding occurs during significant rain events, resulting in a floodway designation for the creek channel and 100 -year floodplain designations adjacent to the floodway. These areas are regulated by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Floodplain Overlay District. The length of Carvin Creek has been listed on Virginia's List of Impaired Waters since 2002 due to violations of the fecal coliform bacteria water quality standard. The primary cause of this impairment is surface water runoff from areas such as parking lots and roads. Karst topography featuring caves and sinkholes is found in and around Walrond Park, south of Williamson Road, and to the east of Plantation Road. Tinker Creek Carvins Cove The Roanoke River Source: Roanoke Outside Source: Roanoke Outside EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER ENVIRONMENT Old Tombstone Source: Flickr Tinker Ridge overlooking Carvins Cove Reserve Source: visitroanokeva.com Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS r- ENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Community Facilities and Infrastructure Figure 2-19 Facilities Schools Roanoke County Public Schools serving the Hollins Center area include Burlington Elementary, Mountain View Elementary, Northside Middle and Northside High. None of these schools are located within the Hollins Center study area. Burlington Elementary is just west of the study area boundary on Peters Creek Road (see Map 2-1). Hollins University, a private liberal arts university with graduate and undergraduate academic programs, lies adjacent to the study area on Williamson Road. Enrollment at Hollins University for the 2018-2019 school year is 654 undergraduate women and 145 coed graduate students. Community School, located near the study area on Williamson Road, is a private institution educating children age 3 through middle school. 2018-2019 enrollment at Community School is 150 students. The public schools serving the Hollins area have extra capacity to absorb future growth. These schools are all below capacity now, and are forecasted to be further under capacity through 2026 (see Figure 2-19). Roanoke County Public Schools Enrollment and Capacity 6400 c 1200 -u 1000 8W 400o E; 1' 1 Z 6urlinglon Wur lain View Nurlhr de Northside I ligh Hementnry Fknnc:ntary hAddle, ■ 2018 Enrollrrnenl ■ Foreuusled 2025-2026 Erirnllrnenl Copudly Libraries The Hollins Branch Library is a 17,900 square foot facility that lies just west of the study area at 6624 Peters Creek Road (see Map 2-1). The Hollins University Private Library, located adjacent to the study area, is open to the public for a fee. The Hollins Branch Library is the second busiest library in the Roanoke Valley Consortium, which includes Botetourt County, Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem. Hollins Library circulates 23% of the County's items and averages 600 visitors per day, also 23% of the County's total. Hollins Library restarted Sunday operations in 2018, which has been popular. Hollins is maintaining this high service level without offering the square footage or amenities such as a cafe, multiple study rooms, and the modernized meeting rooms provided by the Vinton and South County Libraries. In 2018, Hollins Library reached capacity and is therefore unable to increase visitors or circulation without a new or modernized building. The popularity of the library is a testament to its value to the community. '.XISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Parks Water Park are located 2.8 miles from the Hollins Center study area. Green Ridge provides strength training and cardiovascular health equipment, personal trainers, group exercise classes, a walking track, indoor swimming pool, gymnasium, and programmed activities for adults and children. Splash Valley is an outdoor aquatic facility featuring water slides, a children's sprayground, and other water play features. Walrond Park lies just west of the study area on Walrond Drive (see Map 2-1). Walrond is a busy, popular 40 -acre public park offering a variety of passive and active recreation as well as beautiful panoramic vistas. Scheduled baseball, soccer, and softball games are held in Walrond Park, which also offers disc golf, picnic shelters, a soap -box derby track, playground, tennis courts and a 2/3 mile walking path around Walrond Pond. Recent upgrades have been completed to field lighting, the soap box derby track, and disc golf course. A wetland boardwalk was recently constructed and a tennis court was converted into four pickleball courts. A new playground was constructed in 2019. Future plans include construction of the Roanoke County North District Maintenance Shop. Many of the people who work at establishments along Plantation Road enjoy walking or picnicking here at lunchtime. Sadler Park is located two miles from Hollins Center, north of Williamson Road near the Botetourt County line. Sadler Park features a basketball court and playground, as well as trees and open lawn. Hollins Park is located on Hollins Road, 3 miles from Hollins Center, featuring soccer fields, a 1/3 mile gravel path and a playground. Potential improvements include paving the parking lot, a new picnic shelter and restroom, playground improvements and paving the existing park trail. Roanoke County's Green Ridge Recreation Center and Splash Valley Public Safety Roanoke County's Fire and Rescue Department is staffed with a combination of career and volunteer personnel operating out of 13 stations and one administrative office. All career personnel are trained to the Virginia Department of Fire Program Firefighter 2 standard, which is the highest standard for firefighters. All career ambulances are staffed as Advance Life Support ambulances. The Hollins Fire and Rescue Station #5 is located on Barrens Road, just west of the study area. Personnel from this station are the first responders to North Roanoke County and to any traffic accidents on Interstate 81 in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. Calls to this station can come from a variety of sources: industrial facilities, residences, commercial businesses, interstate auto accidents, and other emergencies. Call diversity can create a variety of challenges for available equipment and responder expertise (see Figure 2-20). Hollins CENTER Figure 2-20 EXISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE [aciri Roanoke County Fire.nd A.- of Square Age Acreage Footage Original Equipment Structurelk 19L - - Rescue Station staff Tota I Service capacity Tota I Staff Volunteers per shift All hazards Fire Engine, response, Hollins Ambulance, Advance Life F Fire and 2.5 12,208 1981 Brush Truck, Support, medical 5 18 32 Rescue Command response, public Station Truck education, public standbys Source: Roanoke County Fire and Rescue, November 2018 The Hollins Station was the third busiest station by incident in Roanoke County for fiscal year 2018 (see Figure 2-21). At this time the Hollins Station does not have adequate coverage and capacity for growth in the Hollins area. Although call volumes were consistently about 2,200 per year between fiscal years 2014 and 2018, future economic growth will present a challenge for the station to respond to calls within the Hollins District without relying on outside stations and agencies. Figure 2-21 FY 2418 Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Incidents by Station 3.544 31400 2,940 7.504 2.411 2.305 2,062 2.009 2,044 1,500 _ 1,367 1.404 540 1d 1 3 1��1 lib ,g Soynce: Roonoke CoUn}y Fee and Rescue November 2418 The Roanoke County Police Department records reveal that crime in the Hollins area decreased in 2015, 2016 and 2017, and remained stable in 2018. The most prevalent crimes in the area during that time period were related to illegal drug possession (average 16 per year), driving under the influence of alcohol (average 15 per year) and public intoxication (average 11 per year). In 2018, calls for service increased countywide by approximately 8%. While the majority of these calls are not related to crime, there was an increase in shoplifting and theft from vehicles. Hollins Fire Station EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE kA Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS CENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Infrastructure motor vehicle crashes is increasing in the Roads Hollins Center study area (see Figure 2-23). Interstate 81 is the northern boundary of the study area. Portions of three primary roads, Plantation Road (Route 115), Williamson Road (Route 1 1) and Peters Creek Road (Route 117), form the study corridors (see Map 2-22). The 2018 average daily (vehicle) trips for these roads are: • Interstate 81 near Exit 146 (53,000- 63,000) • Peters Creek Road (19,000) • Plantation Road (13,000 to 16,000) • Williamson Road (11,000) There are no road projects planned in the Hollins Center study area; however, Interstate 81 is being studied as part of a state -led Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Plan, which was approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board in December 2018. The General Assembly passed legislation in 2019 to generate revenue for projects identified in the Plan. A currently funded project will provide additional northbound and southbound lanes on 1-81 between Mile Marker 144 (near Interstate 581) and Exit 150 (Route 220 at Troutville). The proposed design will establish a three -lane road in both directions. The Interstate 81 Exit 150 interchange, four miles north in Botetourt County, was rebuilt in 2018-2019 by the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve safety and traffic flow on Routes 220 and 11. The number of Figure 2-23 Motor Vehicle Crashes 2011-2017 60 50 40 U 30 0 20 10 z 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Source: VDOT STARS Data - March 2018 Over the past ten years, both pedestrian and bicycle fatalities have also been documented in and around the Hollins Center study area. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations Currently, people are walking and biking in the Hollins area. Sidewalks are located along Williamson Road between Plantation Road and Hollins Court (south side) and Plantation Road and Marson Drive (north side). Social paths are visible in grassed areas along Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road. Several bicycle and pedestrian projects were sparked by the implementation strategies included in the 2008 Hollins Area Plan. 2014: Pedestrian crosswalks and signals were installed on all four legs of the Williamson Road/Plantation Road intersection. '.XISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 2018: A turnaround was completed at the end of Lila Drive, enabling Roanoke County to request that VDOT accept the formerly private road into its system as a Secondary Street. 2018: Phase 1 of the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Project was completed, which added a ten -foot -wide shared use path to the west side of Plantation Road between Williamson Road and Walrond Drive. Curb, gutter, storm drain, street trees and a "Welcome to the Hollins Community" gateway sign were also a part of the project. Plantation Road Shared Use Path Source: Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV-3) Other Funded Projects: 2020: A new traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Plantation Road and Lila Drive. The project will consolidate entrances at Wells Fargo. Pedestrian signals and crosswalks will also be included. 2021: Phase 2 of the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Hollins CENTER Improvement Project will add sidewalk, curb, gutter and street trees along the west side of Plantation Road between Walrond Drive and Gander Way. The Walrond Drive intersection will also be realigned and pedestrian signals and crosswalks will be added to the Gander Way/Plantation Road intersection. VDOT has also directed safety funds to this area because of recent bicycle and pedestrian fatalities. A pedestrian was hit and killed by a car while crossing Williamson Road near Greenway Drive in the early morning hours of April 18, 2012. A bicyclist traveling northbound was hit and killed by a car at night in the 6900 block of Williamson Road, near North Roanoke Assisted Living, on November 17, 2016. Another pedestrian was hit and killed by a car while walking along Williamson Road at night near the intersection of Hollins Court Drive on April 27, 2017. Three pedestrian safety projects are proposed for Williamson Road: Phase 1: Add pedestrian crosswalks and signals at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Williamson Road; construct sidewalk along the west side of Williamson Road between Peters Creek Road and North Roanoke Assisted Living. Design is underway and construction is anticipated in 2022. Phase 2: Sidewalk will be constructed along the north side of Williamson Road to connect the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Project to the Williamson Road sidewalk Hollins CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE and intersection improvements at Peters Creek Road. Phase 3: Continue sidewalk along the west side of Williamson Road between North Roanoke Assisted Living and Clubhouse Drive/Dent Road. Design is anticipated to begin in 2023. See the Transportation Projects map for project locations. Plantation Road Shared Use Path Phase II Concept Greenways The 2018 Roanoke Valley Greenway Plan (Greenway Plan) shows the proposed route for the Tinker Creek Greenway extending from the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, through Roanoke County to the Botetourt Center at Greenfield in Botetourt County. Two sections of the Tinker Creek Greenway are existing: • Wise Avenue to the Roanoke River Greenway, 1.5 paved miles in the City of Roanoke, completed in 2001. • Trailhead parking lot north of Interstate 81 to Carvins Cove Boat Dock, 2 natural surface miles in Roanoke County and Botetourt County, completed in 2012. The City of Roanoke has obtained funding to design and construct a 1.8 -mile paved segment of the greenway from Wise Avenue to Mason Mill Park. Construction is anticipated in 2022. The Tinker Creek Greenway map shows the conceptual routes identified in the Greenway Plan. Alignments analyzed between the City of Roanoke boundary and Williamson Road are described as: • Road Corridor: Roanoke City/Roanoke County boundary to Hollins Road to Plantation Road to Williamson Road. • Combined Stream -Road Corridor: Roanoke City/Roanoke County boundary along the stream corridor to Mountain View Elementary School connecting to Plantation Road to Williamson Road. • Creek Corridor: Roanoke City/Roanoke County boundary to Williamson Road along Tinker Creek and Carvin Creek. EXISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Hollins h�NTER Hollins CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE The Road Corridor option was most preferred by nearby residents. Sections of Plantation Road have wide right-of-way which could fit a greenway/shared use path. There are three potential routes identified between the intersection of Williamson Road/Plantation Road to reach and continue into Botetourt County: 1) Road Corridor: U.S. 11 /Williamson Road/Lee Highway corridor from Hollins University to Cloverdale and I- 81 underpass at Tinker Creek. 2) Combined Stream -Road Route: U.S. 11 /Williamson Road/Lee Highway corridor but route off the highway where feasible between Williamson Road at Hollins University and the 1-81 underpass at Tinker Creek. 3) Off -Road Corridor: Tinker Mountain option; cross under 1-81 at Hollins University and continue on the northwest side of 1-81, off-road, around the base of the mountain to the Tinker Creek underpass. The ultimate greenway alignment and surface will depend upon where right-of- way and/or easements can be obtained. Botetourt County has also obtained funding for design and construction of the Daleville Greenway, which will connect Lord Botetourt High School with the Botetourt Center at Greenfield. Construction is anticipated in 2020. The Tinker Creek Greenway will connect to the Daleville Greenway at Lord Botetourt High School. Trails Carvins Cove Natural Reserve contains 60 miles of hiking, biking and equestrian trails. In 2019 Roanoke County and Roanoke Valley Greenways opened the Hinchee Trail, a two-mile segment connecting Salem to Hollins via the trails at Carvins Cove. These trails helped contribute to the Roanoke Valley's designation as Mountain Bikers at Carvins Cove Source: Virginia's Blue Ridge Virginia's Blue Ridge Ride Center, an International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) Silver -Level Ride Center. Virginia's Blue Ridge is the only East Coast destination to earn the Silver -Level designation from IMBA. The Appalachian National Scenic Trail passes through Roanoke and Botetourt Counties just north and east of Hollins, including crossing the ridge of Tinker Mountain. The Appalachian Trail is a 2,180 - mile long public footpath that traverses the great diversity of natural and cultural beauty along the Appalachian Mountains. The Appalachian Trail is managed by the '.XISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Appalachian Trail Conservancy, as well as many state agencies and volunteers. These natural resources provide many opportunities for accessing outdoor amenities and culture, while preserving mountain views from the Hollins Center study area. Read Mountain Preserve, a 243 -acre preserve will soon be expanded by an additional 300 acres, further protecting mountains views. Transit There is currently no fixed -route transit service in the Hollins area. The closest Valley Metro routes run from the City of Roanoke north on Plantation Road past Food Lion and Walmart Neighborhood Market, then west on Hershberger Road with a stop at Edinburgh Square apartments and Friendship Health and Living Community, approximately two miles from the study area. Hollins University contracts with RADAR to provide shuttle service Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays to Valley View Mall, Center in the Square (Downtown) and Townside Square shopping center. Regional Transportation Plans Roanoke County is a member of both the Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission (RVARC) and the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (TPO). The TPO boundary includes the Roanoke Valley Urbanized Hollins CENTER Area, which includes most of Roanoke County with the exception of the Catawba and Bent Mountain areas. The Urbanized Area also includes the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, parts of Botetourt County, Bedford County and Montgomery County. Map 2-25 al=o- R TPOMeiropojjW Planning Area , [/ �v'ia�nm ��^vnwmwrv., 1 The 2016 RVARC Roanoke Valley Transit Vision Plan included recommendations for the Hollins area. Short-term recommendations (2016-2022) focused on expanding transit service to employment and residential areas in the North Roanoke County/ Hollins/ Plantation Road area. More specifically, the Plan recommends implementing a new circulator connecting the activity centers of Crossroads, Hollins/Plantation Road, the DMV and other key locations in North Roanoke County. A medium-term recommendation (2022-2030) proposes improving regional connectivity with new peak hour service between Greenfield/Daleville, Plantation Road and Downtown Roanoke providing transit access to key destinations. A long- term recommendation (2030-2040) expands upon this proposal, by providing a Hollins CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE consistent all -day connection between Greenfield/Daleville via Plantation Road to Downtown Roanoke. Additionally, a Small Transit Transfer Facility is another long-term recommendation for the Hollins area. The 2012 Update to the Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Organization identifies Priority and Vision corridors for bicycle accommodations. "Corridors comprising the Priority List generally form the foundation of the current and/or planned bikeway system in the RVAMPO with Vision List corridors supporting the framework of the Priority List and fill in any gaps in connectivity." (Bikeway Plan, p. 1 1 1) Several corridors are identified in the Hollins Center area. Priority List Corridors: • Plantation Road from Interstate 81 to Williamson Road • Plantation Road from Interstate 81 to Crowe Hollow Lane (Botetourt County) Vision List Corridors: • Peters Creek Road from the City of Roanoke to Williamson Road • Williamson Road from Peters Creek Road to Botetourt County • Plantation Road from Williamson Road to the City of Roanoke • Laban Road from North Barrens Road to Webster Road • Webster Road from Laban Road to Dallas Road • Dallas Road between Webster Road and Enon Drive • Enon Drive between Dallas Road and Walrond Drive • Walrond Drive from Walrond Park Road to Plantation Road The Plantation Road shared use path provides bicycle accommodations between Williamson Road and Walrond Drive. The 2015 TPO Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan identifies and prioritizes pedestrian accommodations. Figures 2-26 and 2-27 summarize the high priority and medium priority locality projects and include status updates for each project. Plantation Road Shared Use Path Williamson Road EXISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Figure 2-26 Figure 2-27 015 TPO TPO Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan Locality High Priority Projects ... . Campus Drive to PW 2015 --- None atus Plantation Road Plantation Road to Requested additional proect Williamson Peters Creek Road Hard Surface Pedestrian funding (2018) Road Peters Creek Road to Improvements Preliminary engineering None Greenway Drive underway; Construction 2021 Greenway Drive to Preliminary engineering Middleton Road underway; Construction 2021 Barrens Road to Wood Haven Road Williamson Road Signalized Pedestrian Tinker Creek Completed 2012, Completed 2014 Botetourt County to Interstate 81 1 ntersection Crossing Greenway I I Inatural surface trail Completed 2018 Williamson Williamson Road to Road and Walrond Drive; Plantation Pedestrian Improvements Interstate 81 Construction 2021 Walrond Road Drive to Gander Way Gander Signalized Pedestrian Way/Friendship Lane Construction 2021 Crossing 1 ntersection Williamson Road Signalized Pedestrian Construction 2021 Peters I ntersection Crossing Williamson Road to Hard Surface Pedestrian Creek None Barrens Road Improvements Road Barrens Road Pedestrian Intersection None I ntersection Improvements Hard Surface Pedestrian Plantation Road and Friendship Connection between the (future) tinker None Lane Plantation Road and Creek Greenway Hollins University Figure 2-27 015 TPO Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan Locality Medium Priority Projects -4= ... atus Hard surface pedestrian Williamson Road Botetourt County to Campus Drive None improvements Peters Creek Road Barrens Road to Wood Haven Road Sidewalk None Tinker Creek Completed 2012, Botetourt County to Interstate 81 Greenway hard surface Greenway I I Inatural surface trail Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan, excerpts Source: Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS \LATER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Utilities Water and Sewer '.XISTING CONDITIONS Hollins CENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE The Carvins Cove Water Treatment Facility, located just north of Interstate 81, treats and distributes water from Carvins Cove Reservoir. Two 36 -inch transmission lines run south under Interstate 81. One transmission line runs to and along Plantation Road, then south along Williamson Road. The other transmission line runs east to Hollins University and then south along Carvins Creek to Williamson Road, runs west and south to Dexter Road, then runs behind Kroger to Williamson Road. The two lines run parallel along Williamson Road until the intersection with Florist Road where they The Western Virginia Water Authority owns and manages public water and sewer utilities in most of the Roanoke Valley, including in the Hollins area. In general, public water and sewer infrastructure in the Hollins area is in good condition. Most properties in the Hollins area are served by public water and sewer, with the exception of the North Burlington Heights neighborhood which is located north of Walrond Park and south of the Buckland Forest neighborhood. While there are no water pressure issues, there are some fire flow challenges in locations where water line sizes are small. There are opportunities for upgrading and relocating both water and sewer lines in conjunction with new development. split (see Map 2-28). Sewer mains generally run along streams and creeks. Sewer lines from all over the area flow to an 18 -inch sewer main that runs along Carvins Creek. This sewer main intersects with the Tinker Creek main at the City of Roanoke boundary. From this point, the sewer main follows Tinker Creek to the Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Facility located near the intersection of Tinker Creek and the Roanoke River. The Falls on Carvins Creek 1910 (left) Carvins Creek Dam 2015 (above) Source: Western Virginia Water Authority Hollins EXISTING CONDITIONS r- ENTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Map 2-29 • • � , • rte. f 5�. f • • !I • r• 6 � I � • i r' � a • .i • �a t •. • • • � • i • ■ *�. �. ■fir �►�► � • �} i • • is i i� 2-34 HOLLINS CENTER PLAN - DRAFT 5formwater January 2019 0 Detention Basin o Storm Drain Storm Sewer Streams Study Area 0 250 500 1,000 Feet N XISTING CONDITIONS COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Stormwater Starting with the adoption of the Clean Water Act in 1972, stormwater regulations and requirements have changed several times since the majority of the study area was constructed. As a result, the stormwater infrastructure present is located along major roadways widened in the 1990s and in conjunction with newer development. When combined with poor drainage in several areas, there are many places where stormwater infrastructure could be improved. Since new development and redevelopment will need to conform with current regulations, incremental improvements are possible. Electric Appalachian Power provides electricity to the study area and to the Roanoke Valley Gas Natural gas and propane are available in the area from Roanoke Gas Company. Plantation Road Stormwater Infrastructure (above) Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority (right) Source: Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission map HOLLINS CEN_ Cable Hollins CENTER Several providers offer cable television service, including Cox Cable, Xfinity TV from Comcast, Dish TV and DIRECTV. Phone Land line and cell phone service are available through AT&T and Verizon. Sprint and T -Mobile provide cell phone service in the study area. Internet/Broadband Internet service is available through Cox Cable Internet, Xfinity Internet from Comcast, ViaSat Satellite Internet and Verizon. The Roanoke Valley Broadband Authority was established in 2014 by Roanoke County, Botetourt County, the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem. Fiber-optic internet is now accessible throughout the Roanoke Valley. In the study area, broadband conduit runs along Peters Creek Road, Williamson Road, and along Plantation Road between Williamson Road and the Carvins Cove Water Treatment Facility. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES CENTER Appendix 3. Community Engagement Engagement Activities In order to build a robust plan supported by the Hollins community, staff sought to engage those who live, work and shop in the area as well as those who care about its regional importance. Public input was gathered throughout the planning process to help shape, define and refine the Plan. The Plan's Vision and Principles include input received from the community and stakeholders through meetings, surveys and other outreach. Community Meetings The study kicked off with two community meetings covering the technical context of the study area, which included land use regulations, environmental conditions and current transportation projects. Meeting Attendance Saturday, March 3, 2018: 40 Thursday, March 8, 2018: 56 Participants gave feedback on opportunities and challenges that they as residents, business owners and area employees saw for transportation, development and economic growth in Hollins. Activities were also available for children. Participants examine the study area, March 8, 2018 The meetings were advertised in a news release that was shared by the media, County e -newsletters, the County website, County social media pages (using paid advertising), and emails to members of the public who signed up online or at previous planning meetings. Staff also visited more than 130 businesses within the study area and mailed postcards to addresses within one mile of the study area. Participants provide feedback, March 8, 2018 Source: Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV-3) HOLLINS CENTER PLAN - DRAFTIJ Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT r_ ENTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Stakeholder Feedback Over the course of the study, staff engaged 78 stakeholders at 18 meetings. These in-depth discussions included a wide range of local staff, community advocates, business representatives and other organizations. The discussions generated several overarching themes shared across the groups, available for reference online. Age$ ROANOKE COUNTY VA 'LAM G3EERY ICES BOTETOURT COUNTY OF VIRGINIA SolRoanoke Valley Transportation PLANNING ORGANIZATION REcI&ALcommission Planning Stakeholders 'ROANOKE COUNTY VA i -P IQ I I Q � I I I I � — G R E IN WAYS MENRoanoke Valley Transportation PLANNING ORGANIZATION 1.. REGIbNALCGrnrPYIS510n Transportation Stakeholders 'ROANOKE COUNTY VA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT B O T E T O U R T A Williamson Road Area Business Association ROANOKE REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP CHAMBER I Poe&Cronk VIRGININS EA 1= 11 ao P BLUE RIDGE® H RE/MAX` THALHIMER REGIONAL commission Economic Development Stakeholders o� BLUE RIDGE -- I A N U C 0NSF RbANC 1 HOLLINS U N 1 V E R S I T Y Environmental Stakeholders COKE 00 0 �& 12E.5G Public Safety Stakeholders COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AROANOKE COUNTY VA mp W E S T E R N it I R G 4 N I A WATER AUTHORITY :1 18167-1101 '-fill 0 AUTHORITY Utilities Stakeholders • Double Envelope Hollins CENTER /f41?Rfas Property Owners/Tenants Stakeholders Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT r_ ENTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Online Survey An online survey, open to the public from February 1, 2018, through April 7, 2018, received 393 responses about the Hollins Center area. The survey asked respondents to share opinions and information about their relationship to the study area; their perspectives on how safe, easily accessed, and unique it is; the issues they saw regarding businesses, transportation, housing and land use; and the types of improvements they'd like to see there. The online survey was also translated into Spanish and paper copies in both languages were available at County libraries and at the community meetings. The survey was promoted on social media and advertised in area mailings, County e - newsletters and study fliers. The complete survey results were revealed at the Design Open Houses in May, available for reference online. Community meetings urvey station, March 8, 2018 9 A. Farticipants cast votes on potential study area improvements, May 10, 2018 Design Open Houses The Design Open Houses presented the results of the community meetings and survey and asked questions related to potential future design options for a new Hollins Center. Meeting Attendance: Thursday, May 10, 2018: 37 Saturday, May 19, 2018: 17 Attendees voted on possibilities for commercial and residential redevelopment, new community spaces and multi -modal transportation improvements. They indicated preferred and not preferred improvements in each category. This visual preference survey helped staff identify design recommendations and priorities. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES NTER Map 3-1 r-•. _ - �.:_. - - � � -' w., o fir} W 61 r s"� y • � : �'' rye, r { vn Is •'� ` :'` �c i ' ul� a Mbit' 1Nalrand Park.. _ f 4 A iR, ' P i + Storage ^xx CVS 00r e 4 b 1 Potential Redevelopment Areas and Suggestions for Uses (Based on Spring 2018 Public Feedback) Residential Non -Residential Non -Residential Non -Residential • Townhouses • Bars And Breweries • Library (relocated) • Public Art • Apartments • Entertainment Venues • Sports Complex • Industrial Uses • Single Family Homes • Farmer's Market • Youth Center • Research & Development • Retirement Housing • Specialty Grocery Stores • Fitness Center Note: Color indicates boundaries Non -Residential • Lifestyle Center • Outdoor Public Spaces of potential redevelopment areas • Sit -Down Restaurants • Retail Stores • Dog Park • Coffee Shops/Cafes 0 Hardware Store Art Galleries 0 250 soo iso i,oflo Feer N Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CENTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Soundwall Desired Map 3-2 �0f /0& .....� �O0nO D � CSL/ +fYP C /1/y OG Hollins University Walrond Park \uta 1 0 � t*\ e Loo ot+`o e / Gp,�se S r T C� 10 Fire and Rescue Station #5 Hollins C ov\ge n Dt�ve n�\e't\ f library a� ,ar Qlo 06 0 .r Burlington Elementary School` Transportation Feedback January 2019 \ Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Comments --lo- Vehicular Facility Comments 0 Bus Service Comments Signals and Crosswalks associated with new transportation projects I 11 Existing Sidewalk ° '0 $p° 4Feet f Study Area N COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES CENTER Open House Exhibits A map labeled Potential Redevelopment Areas and Suggestions for Uses (Map 3-1) displayed possible types and sites for development and redevelopment in the study area. The Transportation Feedback map (Map 3-2) showed issues and needs in the study area. Both maps were based on the March meetings' public feedback, survey results and stakeholder interviews. Attendees could also view plans and concepts for several funded multi -modal transportation projects. i. Adfi� , Attendees and staff discuss transportation projects at a Design Open House, May 10, 2018 Another map asked participants where in the Roanoke Valley they wanted to walk or bike to from the study area. A final map of the greater region asked participants where they would like to take the bus from the study area. Participants marked their desired destinations on the map. Participants mark where they want to walk or bike, May 10, 2018 Top Walk/Bike Destinations: • Surrounding neighborhoods • Green Ridge Recreation Center • Hollins Trail head /Carvins Cove • Walrond Park Participants mark where they want to ride the bus, May 10, 2018 Top Bus Destinations: • Downtown Roanoke • Along Plantation Road • Around the study area • Downtown Salem Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT r- ENTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Online Design Survey The meeting exercises were also available online from March 23 to April 26, 2019. In order to increase feedback on the preferred and not preferred future design options, the Design Open House exercise was adapted into an online survey. It was available to the public from June 3, 2018, through July 2, 2018, and received 58 responses. The full results of the visual preference survey, combining the results of the two meetings and the online survey are available online. Draft Plan Reveal Meetinas A final round of meetings asked participants to consider potential projects and design concepts that built on the previous meeting results. Meeting Attendance: Saturday, March 23, 2019: 59 Monday, March 25, 2019: 84 Participants gave feedback on: • Public space and landscaping concepts, various park improvements and a range of multimodal transportation improvements; • Vision and implementation principles for new development and redevelopment; and • Future land use scenarios that would guide the type of development to be encouraged in the area. Participants discuss meeting results, March 23, 2019 Draft Plan Reveal Exhibits The meeting exhibits included a process display showing previous exercises and results. The draft Vision, Principles, and Core Objectives were shared for the first time at this meeting. The interactive exhibits included ranking and comment exercises. ' ��s MrICipM /2: Ifpr�ftlde CanurwniYy faCiTlieS Core Cvncepb Ensure Mal public services and -• . —et the +seeds of the C�ruty. Whot other improvements Would you like to see? iS Park Improvements Exercise COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins Two exercises asked participants to rank six Each exercise included the relevant types of Gateway/Streetscape Principle, Core Concept(s) and Supporting Improvements and Community Amenities. Initiative(s) identified in the draft Plan. The The examples were drawn from previous results of each exercise (combining the engagement exercises where participants results from both meetings and online expressed a desire to "green up" the area surveys) are available online. and create comfortable outdoor gathering spaces. Principle #3: Create a Destination ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES CENTER residents, employees, students and visitors. i dins Supporting Initiative: Update the Future Land Use Map Future Lend U..Designetions "h-1 A combined transportation exercise Finally, a Future Land Use exercise asked showed a map with all potential road, participants to pick which of three land use pedestrian/bicycle and greenway projects scenarios most appealed to them. The and asked participants to rank them within options included a no change scenario, those categories. A parks exercise showed partial mixed use scenario (around the maps of Walrond Park, Hollins Park and intersections of Peters Creek Sadler Park with potential improvements Road/Williamson Road and Plantation and requested comments about other Road/Williamson Road) and full mixed use desired improvements for each park. scenario. Principle #3: Create a Destination Core Concept. Encourage a mix of commercial and residential uses to serve residents, employees, students and visitors. i dins Supporting Initiative: Update the Future Land Use Map Future Lend U..Designetions "h-1 Place dot below future land a your preferred use scenario. ransPrincipesl �,v Pnne� Tition Pransifion Transition Irttlu leoIntlu57�'8fr � r� e Mixed Use ® / � Tronsifian Transition aF t ♦ j� ! ,�v,.l, Pr ncipol . � mixed use � � Intlustriol � Neighborhood Neighborhoatl i 1-.' Meighborhaatl Cnnservofion s Conservation Conaerva}ion \Mixed Use. ^ Mixed Use i 1 1 rran�ifian � Tran:than � r\ ' Tran�ran ~\ Ar y Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood } y Conservation s i .A Conservation, 6 S Conservation Development 4 jDevelopment r Development ii Future Land Use Exercise Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CENTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Planning Commission Work Sessions Staff also promoted the Hollins Center and Staff provided regular updates about the study to the Planning Commission. Presentations included information about upcoming community meetings, other engagement exercises and public input received. The meetings were held in 2018 on February 6, March 20, April 17 and May 15; and in 2019 on March 19, April 16 and May 21. Staff run an input table for customers and employees at a local Goodwill, March 20, 2018 Other Outreach Hoping to engage members of the public who may not have heard of the study, staff planned a lunchtime public input session at the Goodwill on Peters Creek Road on March 20, 2018, from noon to 2 p.m. A table was set up near the front door, offering shoppers and employees a chance to learn about and discuss the study with staff. Paper copies of the spring survey were also available. other planning studies at Tons of Fun at Tanglewood Mall on February 2, 2018. Kids used a table map and cutouts to design their own County park while staff talked with parents about the upcoming study. Table visitors of all ages could also vote on their favorite style of park. Anyone who provided their email address for the study mailing list was entered into a prize drawing for a business at Tanglewood Mall. Ir L11 Kids design their own parks at Tons of Fun event, February 3, 2018 All of the study's engagement activities were promoted on a dedicated webpage and email list, and shared in County e - newsletters, Facebook pages and news releases. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins CENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS Summary of Major Needs and Suggestions from all Engagement Activities • Redevelop commercial areas and repurpose outdated properties into a mix of housing, locally -owned businesses and places to gather; • Install placemaking elements (street trees, benches, pedestrian lighting, etc.) and neighborhood connections to foster community identity, • Enhance corridors with signage, landscaping and multi -modal transportation options including sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes and/or shared -use paths, • Address traffic congestion and lighting to increase safety for all, • Embrace the outdoors by linking to parks or natural resources, and by protecting open space, creeks and mountain views; and • Consider rebuilding the library at a more central, connected location. Engagement Results The survey results, public meeting exercises and stakeholder discussions brought to light many of the same needs and issues in the study area. Feedback highlighted that people who live or work near the study area are not only interested in greater convenience for their daily activities, but also in enhancing the appearance of Hollins. Many agreed that the community and Hollins in general was a desirable place to live, work and raise a family, but were frustrated with the lack of many perceived upgrades still needed to elevate its position in the County. Residents from other areas of the County suggested that very little drew them to the area. Local residents were disappointed to have to go elsewhere in the County for entertainment. Online Survey Half of the Hollins Center Survey respondents did not feel that the area had unique qualities. Those who did believed that the area's natural views, access to I- 81, outdoor recreation opportunities and Hollins University made it distinct from other areas in the Roanoke Valley. Many hoped visual improvements including gateway signage and landscaping, along with commercial area upgrades and new restaurants, could make Hollins a destination for the greater region. Asked to choose three different improvements, 60 percent of respondents Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT r_ ENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS felt that walkability and the aesthetics or character of the study area were important to its future success. Half of respondents desired public outdoor spaces. Nearly all respondents use a car in the study area, whereas only 26 percent walk and 9 percent bike. Asked to choose the three most important transportation issues in the study area, 65 percent chose pedestrian accommodations, 56 percent chose traffic congestion and 37 percent chose bicycle accommodations. Figure 3-3 What do you like best about the study area? (Check all that apply) Convenient ■ Ioapfion 8fi% schools Businesses 2 '. Neighborhood 27% Mountain Views 45% Oiher ■ s% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% am 90%100, Two thirds of survey respondents stated that they appreciate Hollins' convenient location Given the option of three transportation and streetscape improvements, respondents selected sidewalks and crosswalks (58 percent), greenways and shared use paths (50 percent), landscaping (33 percent) and road safety improvements (33 percent). Survey respondents wanted economic improvements to focus on the variety and quantity of restaurants (68 percent) and retail (59 percent) while supporting existing business (37 percent) and encouraging more local events/activities (36 percent) . At the stakeholder meetings, March community meetings, and in the survey results, participants identified a large variety of desired development, including: • Sit-down restaurants • Coffee shops • Bars and breweries • Entertainment venues • Specialty grocery stores • A lifestyle/Town Center • A youth center • A sports complex • Research and development • Apartments • Library (relocated) • Retirement housing Complete results for each exercise and the surveys are available online. Desian Survev Results COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins CENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS preference for town center mixed use development, but did not want to see own more "big box" anchor stores. Of the low- density housing options, standalone patio homes were preferred. Results were mixed about high-density housing, with most respondents showing some interest in multi- nts to family options with fewer floors. The visual preference survey broke d the broad improvements that were recommended by the Hollins Center Survey results into specific options for redevelopment, placemaking and transportation. This enabled participa more clearly convey the changes they wanted to see in the study area. I. Clockwise from top left, the top results of the commercial and housing visual preference survey show a town center, a typical one -floor shopping center, a modern on -street mixed use and an entertainment complex. Community meeting participants and online survey takers cast more votes for the commercial redevelopment options than the high or low-density housing options. Of the commercial redevelopment options, survey respondents showed a strong Clockwise from top left, the top results of the placemaking and outdoor spaces visual preference survey shows restaurant outdoor seating, a natural water and play park, sidewalk rain gardens and street trees. Of the options for landscaping and streetscaping, most survey respondents wanted outdoor seating at restaurants and greener streets. For outdoor recreation, participants liked the idea of a natural water/play park or a large festival and event park for the Hollins Center area. Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS Survey respondents also liked pedestrian- All visual preference survey images and oriented lighting and signs as placemaking results are available online. elements. 0 Clockwise from top left, the top results of the transportation visual preference survey shows paved greenways, separated bike -ped shared path, main street sidewalks and natural surface hiking trails. For pedestrian improvements, survey respondents liked paved greenways, natural surface hiking trails and sidewalks in both public spaces and neighborhoods. The winning choice for bikes was the separated bike and pedestrian shared use paths, with sharrows (bikes share the lane with cars) as the least desired option. Finally, respondents wanted to see an expansion of the Valley Metro bus system or a community trolley to provide transit options. Draft Plan Reveal Results In addition to the 143 participants who attended one of the meetings, 54 participants completed the exercises for the Draft Plan Reveal online. The following results combine all the input received. I 2, Is - 19 II 6 10 xoW� unlwifry \\\ 2 ,! r la 3 0 2 4. 12 03 Transportation projects combined map exhibit Feedback about transportation needs was received at nearly every event. At the Draft Plan Reveal meetings, staff synthesized the results of previous meetings and surveys and asked participants to rank those potential projects. Potential projects were categorized as road projects, bicycle and pedestrian projects, greenway projects and transit projects. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins CENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS Top 3 Road Projects 1. Improve the Williamson Road/Peters Creek Road Intersection 2. Widen Interstate 81 (support regional and statewide efforts) 3. Improve the Plantation Road/Williamson Road intersection Tie 6 WOlra n� �l]fil 3 1 Tie 4 4 Road Project Ranking: Combined Results Top 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects 1. Peters Creek Road from Williamson Road to Barrens Road 2. Williamson Road from Plantation Road to Campus Drive/LaMarre Drive (north side) 3. Plantation Road from Williamson Road to Lila Drive (east side) Top 3 Greenway Projects 1. Construct a greenway segment from the trailhead parking lot under 1-81 to Carvins Creek in collaboration with Hollins University. 2. Continue discussions with Hollins University regarding constructing a greenway segment along Carvins Creek from the Friendship Lane bridge at Carvins Creek to Williamson Road. 3. Construct along Williamson Road from Plantation Road to Campus Drive/LaMarre Drive (north side). Transit Opportunity Question 68 percent of respondents said that Roanoke County should work with area businesses and Hollins University to determine demand and support for potential expansion of mass transit routes. Future Land Use Scenarios Three future land use (FLU) scenarios were presented at the Draft Plan Reveal meetings. Two scenarios recommended changing property within the study area to a Mixed Use FLU designation. The online survey and public meetings results followed the same order (combined here): • Full Mixed Use (56%) • Partial Mixed Use (38%) • No Change (6%) Hollins COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT r_ ENTER ENGAGEMENT RESULTS Gateway and Streetscape Features Community Amenities A final visual preference exercise helped A similar exercise asked about the type of clarify the gateway and streetscape improvements that were suggested at previous meetings. Staff displayed six common examples of streetscape features and asked participants to rank them. Clockwise from top left, the top results of the gateway and streetscape visual preference survey show gateway features, street lighting, street trees and pedestrian sidewalk lighting. The most desired element was gateway signage with landscaping. Roadway lighting was the second highest result. Street trees which separate the sidewalk from the street or line a roadway were third, and pedestrian -scale lighting for sidewalks was fourth. Landscaped medians and street furniture (including fixtures such as benches and trashcans) were fifth and sixth respectively. community amenities (particularly outdoor amenities) that should be incorporated in the plan. These examples also drew on popular requests from previous meetings or survey results. Clockwise from top left, the top results of the community amenities visual preference survey show pedestrian connections, playground equipment, places to gather and places for pets. Participants most liked the idea of pedestrian (and/or bicycle) connections throughout the study area, followed by outdoor play areas. Places to gather was third and places for pets was fourth. Community gardens and public art were fifth and sixth respectively. Complete results for each exercise and the surveys are available online. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hollins CENTER PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ADOPTION Public Hearings and Adoption Planning Commission Public Hearinq The Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 5, 2020 to incorporate the Hollins Center Plan into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The public hearing was advertised between March 5 to May 5, 2020. Summary of Advertisement: • Postcards/Letters Sent: 4,200 (2,100 addresses sent out twice) • Facebook Reach: 13,840 • Twitter Reach: 11,650 • Email Reach: 1,900 Due to the state of emergency associated with the Coronavirus (COVID-19), all Roanoke County buildings were closed to the public. The public hearing was broadcast live, so members of the public could view the meeting on Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV3) - Channel 3 or on the Roanoke County website. Beginning with a public comment period held March 5 to May 5, 2020, citizens shared comments online, by email or by phone. 10 comments were submitted through the Hollins Center webpage prior to the meeting. During the public hearing, staff received one comment by email and two by phone. Staff also received four emails on the Plan prior to the public hearing. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval to incorporate the Hollins Center Plan into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Public comments are available online. VISION AND PRINCIPLES Hollins CENTER Appendix 4. Vision and Principles The vision and principles for the Hollins Center Plan are derived from community feedback, stakeholder interview responses and existing conditions. Together, the vision and principles set the foundation for plan recommendations and implementation strategies in Appendix 5. Principles 1. Create a destination. 2. Continue to improve and expand the multimodal transportation network. 3. Upgrade community facilities. 4. Pursue opportunities for collaboration. 1. Create a destination. Draw people to places where they can spend time engaging in many different kinds of recreational, educational and leisure activities. Figure 4-1 Core Concept Supporting- Determine desired land uses that are consistent with the area's vision. Encourage a mix of commercial Provide alternatives to and residential single-family detached uses to serve homes with a diverse and residents, affordable housing mix for a employees, varied population. students and Consider public-private visitors. partnerships for redevelopment and revitalization opportunities. Review and update Design Create a unique Guidelines for the study sense of place area. through innovative and high quality Create pedestrian scale development. development standards for the study area. Provide multimodal connections to parks and Embrace the natural resources. outdoors. Protect open spaces, creeks and mountain views. Hollins VISION AND PRINCIPLES CENTER 2. Continue to improve and expand the multimodal transportation network. A shared -use path for bicyclists and pedestrians is complete and several more pedestrian projects are slated for construction over the next few years. Build on this momentum to provide safe accommodations for all users on all major corridors. Figure 4-2 Core Concept Supporting- Work with VDOT to address congestion and safety for all users. Plan for and construct times. Develop a safe, accessible pedestrian and efficient and bicycle accommodations accessible throughout the study area. transportation Library as a 21 st Century Construct segments of the network that provides a range Tinker Creek Greenway of choices. and/or other bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Expand transit opportunities when and where feasible. to the study area when and where feasible. 3. Upgrade community facilities. Community facilities in the Hollins area are among the busiest and most visited in the County, and are also some of the oldest facilities with little room for expansion. Roads widened in the 1980s and 1990s were built for cars and did not include aesthetic features, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations desired today. Figure 4-3 Core Concept Supporting- Consider options for the Hollins Fire and Rescue Station to optimize response times. Ensure that the public services and facilities Rebuild the Hollins Branch meet the needs Library as a 21 st Century of the location for learning and community. gathering. Connect public parks (Walrond, Hollins, Sadler) when and where feasible. Construct and install gateway and streetscape improvements (lighting, Enhance major landscaping, signage, street corridors with furniture, etc.) throughout attractive the study area. streetscape features. Ensure the maintenance of landscaping and other streetscape improvements throughout the study area. VISION AND PRINCIPLES 4. Pursue opportunities for collaboration. Partnerships are important to facilitate and achieve meaningful change. It will be vital to increase awareness of the Hollins Center Plan and provide updates about implementation to stakeholders and the public. Figure 4-4 Core Concept Supporting- Actively seek out developer partners interested in and capable of building mixed use projects. Engage and Actively promote the area collaborate with stakeholders to to restaurants, retailers and implement the entertainment businesses. plan's vision. Maintain communication with business and property owners. Continue to Keep residents and the engage the larger area informed about community. progress. Hollins CENTER Hollins Center conceptually shown as a mixed use corridor that is safe for bicyclists and pedestrians. IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Appendix 5. Implementation and Recommendations The Hollins Center Plan presents a vision for the study area in hand with concrete implementation strategies for the next ten years and comprehensive recommendations for the next twenty. The recommendations include future policy actions as well as physical infrastructure desires and needs. Successful implementation depends on continued community engagement, strategic public investment, policy and regulatory tools and financing methods to encourage private development. Design Principles Roanoke County will develop and/or amend guidelines to implement the design principles of the Plan. These guidelines will support the adoption or revision of ordinances dealing with zoning, subdivision of property, and other development matters. Design guidelines and development standards could address: Conceptual rendering of Hollins Center sign Hollins CENTER Roanoke County celebrates a new Hollins business Source: RVTV-3 permitted uses; building location, height, design and coverage; lighting, parking, landscaping, pedestrian/bicycle accommodations, streetscape amenities, open space and gathering space; signage; stormwater management and other development features. Funding Strategies Roanoke County will invest staff resources to create an interdepartmental team to implement the Plan. Staff will leverage local revenue to obtain funding from state and federal sources for all aspects of the Plan, including multi -modal transportation improvements. Any capital projects will be planned and programmed in the County's 10 -year Capital Improvements Program. Staff will also dedicate time to engage current business and land owners while promoting the Hollins area to developers in order to implement the Plan's vision. Hollins IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS CENTER Redevelopment of existing buildings and any new development will depend on private investment, guided by standards that are developed and encouraged by the County. Timing/Phasing The Hollins Center Plan will be implemented over the next 20+ years. The recommendations listed in this Plan are for the first 10 years, while future projects will be implemented in the 10 to 20 -year time horizon. Many of the recommendations will be implemented in phases and will evolve over time. As different components of the plan are implemented, periodic reviews of the Plan will be necessary and adjustments made based on changing conditions. Communication Keeping residents, the business community and the greater area informed about the Plan's progress will be a high priority for Roanoke County. The existing website will be transitioned to both market and communicate about development within the Hollins area. Current email lists will be used to provide updates to interested parties as progress occurs. Additional opportunities for community engagement may be addressed as part of individual projects recommended in this Plan. Any future updates to the Plan document will include community input. A new business under construction in Hollins Accessibility Implementation of the Hollins Center Plan should accommodate and welcome all people through accessible design. Roanoke County will consult with local representatives to recommend improvements that accomplish this goal. A "State of the Corridor" community meeting following the adoption of the 419 Town Center Plan Getting Started Adoption of the Hollins Center Plan is the first step in implementation process. After adoption, Roanoke County will analyze and determine the most appropriate tools and actions to execute the Plan's recommendations. IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Hollins CENTER Plan Recommendations The recommendations in this plan fall under five categories: land use, community facilities, transportation, gateway/streetscape improvements and community engagement. Each recommendation is additionally separated into two phases: those which fall within a realistic ten-year timeframe and "future" recommendations that would occur later. This sequencing was determined based on factors including community priorities, staff priorities, funding availability and coordination of related projects. Land Use Recommendations Amend the County's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map as recommended in this plan (see map on following page). With the adoption of the Hollins Center Plan, the Future Land Use Map will be amended as shown in the Recommended Future Land Use Map. This changes the Core Future Land Use and Transition Future Land Use designations along Williamson Road, Peters Creek Road, and a portion of Plantation Road to the Mixed Use Future Land Use designation. Review and update design guidelines for the study area. Roanoke County will develop design guidelines and standards to implement the design principles of the Plan. This process will involve the development of new design guidelines and/or revision of existing design guidelines. Review and update development standards regarding desired land uses, parking, lighting, landscaping, and others to encourage a pedestrian scale mixed use development pattern. After developing design guidelines, Roanoke County will review these guidelines against existing development regulations (Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, etc.) to determine what changes, if any, need to be made to these regulations. These changes may include, but not be limited to, updates to parking and lighting standards, landscaping and buffering requirements, the placement and orientation of buildings relative to the street, desired land uses including diverse and affordable housing options, and standards for public/private spaces. Target key sites for future economic development opportunities. Roanoke County will continue to work with private property and business owners to identify and support development or redevelopment of potential catalyst sites. • Mix of uses to be preserved and developed. • Allows more choices for [re]development. • High quality design to enhance rural and historic character of the area. • Pedestrian and vehicular connectivity. Land Use Tvpes ❖ Community Activity Centers ❖ Commercial ❖ Retail & Personal Services ❖ Limited Industrial ❖ Mixed Use ❖ Office and Institutional ❖ Residential ❖ Parks & Outdoor Recreation Hollins IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS CENTER IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Hollins CENTER Land Use (Future) Review and update the Hollins Center Plan based on changing conditions. Implementation of the Plan will occur over the next ten years. After that point, and as different components of the plan are implemented, periodic reviews of the Plan will be necessary and adjustments made based on changing conditions. Communitv Facilities Recommendations Rebuild the Hollins Branch Library as a 21St Century library for learning and gathering. Consider building a new library at a more central, connected location or rebuild the library at its current location. The Hollins Branch Library is the second busiest library in the Roanoke Valley Consortium, which includes Botetourt County, Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem. Hollins Library circulates 23% of the County's items and averages 600 visitors per day, 23% of the County's total. Hollins is maintaining this high service level without offering the square footage or amenities such as a cafe, multiple study rooms, and the modernized meeting rooms provided by other County libraries. In 2018 Hollins Library reached capacity and is therefore unable to increase visitors or circulation without a new or modernized building. Consider options for the Hollins Fire and Rescue Station to optimize response times. • Consider building a new Hollins Fire and Rescue Station at a different location to optimize response times. The Hollins Fire and Rescue Station #5 is currently located at 7401 Barrens Road. The personnel at this station are the first responders to North Roanoke County and to any traffic accidents on Interstate 81 in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. Calls to this station can come from a variety of sources: industrial facilities, residences, commercial businesses, interstate auto accidents, and other emergencies. Call diversity can create a variety of challenges for available equipment and responder expertise. The Hollins Station was the third busiest station by incident in Roanoke County for fiscal year 2018. At this time the Hollins Station does not have adequate coverage and capacity for growth in the Hollins area. Although call volumes were consistently about 2,200 per year between fiscal years 2014 and 2018, future economic growth will present a challenge for the station to respond to calls within the Hollins District without relying on outside stations and agencies. Improve the existing playground, basketball court and picnic shelter at Sadler Park. • Sadler Park is located two miles from the Hollins Center, north of Williamson Road near the Botetourt County line. Sadler Park features a basketball court and older playground, as well as trees and an open lawn. Improvements to the basketball court and picnic shelter are currently scheduled in the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department's Capital Maintenance Fund for 2020. The replacement of the playground is scheduled within the next five years. Pave the existing trail at Hollins Park. • Hollins Park is located on Hollins Road, three miles from the Hollins Center, featuring soccer fields, a 1/3 mile gravel path and a playground. The paving of the park trail is currently scheduled in the Parks, Recreation Hollins IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS CENTER and Tourism Department's Capital Transportation Recommendations Maintenance Fund for 2020. Preserve scenic views of the Read Mountain Preserve. Read Mountain Preserve is a 243 -acre preserve located approximately 2 miles southeast from the study area. The Preserve includes a parking area, trailhead and natural surface hiking trail. The County will be purchasing an additional 300 acres adjacent to the Preserve. This purchase will help protect mountain views from the study area and additional natural surface trails will be constructed to increase regional outdoor recreation opportunities. Community Facilities (Future) Implement recommendations from the updated Master Plan for Parks and Recreation. • Roanoke County will be updating its Master Plan for Parks and Recreation in 2020. As part of that planning process, an evaluation on the need for outdoor recreation improvements and amenities in the Hollins Center and nearby parks, including expanded walking paths, restrooms, new picnic areas, shelters, benches, pet stations, improved outdoor play spaces for all ages, and new and accessible playgrounds should be conducted. Any recommended improvements for the Hollins Center area and nearby parks should be implemented as funding becomes available. Improve the Williamson Road/Peters Creek Road Intersection. Roanoke County will request VDOT to study the functionality of the Williamson Road/Peters Creek Road Intersection. Roanoke County will seek funding for any improvements recommended from this study. Improve the Plantation Road/Williamson Road Intersection. Roanoke County will request VDOT to study the functionality of the Plantation Road/Williamson Road intersection, as well as Plantation Road south to its intersection with Dexter Road. Roanoke County will seek funding for any improvements recommended from this study. Construct an additional lane on both sides (northbound and southbound) of Interstate 81 from Mile Marker 144 to Mile Marker 150. This project is part of the Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Plan, which was approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board in December 2018. The proposed design will establish a three - lane road in both directions. The General Assembly passed legislation in 2019 to generate revenue for projects identified in the Plan. The project schedule has not yet been determined. Construct bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on Peters Creek Road from Williamson to Barrens Road. • Construct sidewalk and bike lanes to connect community facilities to the proposed and funded sidewalk project along Williamson Road. IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Hollins CENTER Construct pedestrian accommodations on Peters Creek Road from Williamson Road to Williamson Road from Plantation Road to Interstate 581. Campus Drive/LaMarre Drive (north sideJ. These studies will evaluate the need for • road improvements, bike and pedestrian accommodations, and other transportation Construct pedestrian improvements that will connect Hollins University to the southern end of the shared use path on Plantation Road and the partially funded sidewalk along the north side of Williamson Road to the Peters Creek Road intersection Construct bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on Walrond Drive from Plantation Road to Walrond Park. Construct a multimodal connection or sidewalk/bike lanes along Walrond Drive connecting Walrond Park to the existing pedestrian network. Work with property owners and stakeholders to finalize alignments of the Tinker Creek Greenway through the study area, south of the study area, and east of the study area. The 2018 Roanoke Valley Greenway Plan Update includes multiple alignments for the Tinker Creek Greenway. Future construction of the greenway will require consensus about the most appropriate alignment based on property acquisition. The Greenway Plan identifies connection opportunities such as the Friendship Retirement Community, Mountain View Elementary School, Village at Tinker Creek, Hollins University, the Carvin Creek Greenway, Carvins Cove Natural Reserve, Brookside Park, Hollins Park, Walrond Park, Sadler Park, Community School, Tombstone Cemetery, and to Botetourt County. Conduct transportation corridor studies along Williamson Road from Plantation Road to the City of Roanoke, and along improvements. Expand transit opportunities to the study area when and where feasible. • Transit service is an important amenity for large employers and residents in the area. Staff will work with interested stakeholders to evaluate transit opportunities and funding alternatives. Transportation (Future) Reconstruct Friendship Lane to provide better access to industrial properties, install bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, and to address drainage issues. • Construct improvements to Friendship Lane to accommodate industrial/commercial growth, provide bicycle and pedestrian connections from Plantation Road to the Tinker Creek Greenway, and provide stormwater and drainage infrastructure. Construct bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on the west side of Plantation Road from Gander Way to Days Inn. • Construct a multimodal connection to extend the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Project on the west side of Plantation Road between Williamson Road and Gander Way. Hollins CENTER IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Construct bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on the east side of Plantation Road from Williamson Road to McDonald's. • Construct a multimodal connection or sidewalk/bike lanes to mirror the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Projects that have occurred along the west side of Plantation Road between Williamson Road and Days Inn. Construct pedestrian accommodations on Gander Way from Plantation Road to its terminus. Construct sidewalks extending from the Gander Way/Plantation Road intersection along Gander Way to its terminus. Construct segments of the Tinker Creek Greenway throughout the study area and outside the study area to connect it to the City of Roanoke and Botetourt County. Extend the Tinker Creek Greenway from the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, through Roanoke County to the Botetourt Center at Greenfield in Botetourt County. Conduct a transportation corridor study along Williamson Road/Route I I from Hollins University to Cloverdale. This study will help inform the chosen alignment of the Tinker Creek Greenway, as well as other transportation improvements needed along the corridor. Gateway/Streetscape Improvements Recommendations Construct and install gateway and streetscape improvements throughout the study area. • As a regional gateway to outdoor and urban amenities, many stakeholders and residents would like to see visual improvements including gateway signage and landscaping. Improvements may include, but not be limited to, lighting, landscaping, signage, street furniture, etc. Leverage available state programs for street and gateway improvements. Streetscape improvements may be supported or funded through state programs that create partnerships with localities or local businesses. Ensure the maintenance of landscaping and other streetscape improvements throughout the study area. Existing and new landscaping and streetscape improvements will need to be maintained by Roanoke County, local private property owners, or business partners to guarantee the longevity of any enhancements. IMPLEMENTATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Hollins CENTER Community Engagement Recommendations Consider public-private partnerships for redevelopment and revitalization opportunities. The redevelopment and density patterns called for by the Plan will depend on private investment but be guided by standards developed by the County. Roanoke County may consider financial incentives as part of public/private partnerships. Actively seek out developer partners interested in and capable of building mixed-use projects. Roanoke County will identify potential developers through marketing efforts, networking and requests for qualifications Events and media exposure will be coordinated to recognize and reward successful developers. Maintain communication with business and property owners. Roanoke County will continue communication with business and property owners about development and redevelopment opportunities and implementation of the Plan. Staff will assist area businesses that wish to learn more about the Plan and share public information materials via the website. Keep residents and the larger area informed about progress. • The current website will shift to both market and to communicate about development within the Hollins Center. Email lists will be used to update those interested as progress occurs. The community may also be engaged through branding development, transportation and development projects, and future updates of the Plan. County departments will receive information on preferred locations for investment, good housing design and retail design for businesses. Collaborate with local organizations, business groups, existing farmers markets and festivals to utilize new or existing open space areas for programming. • Roanoke County will encourage public and private organizations to host programs in the Hollins Center area and consider allowing outdoor sales so retailers can "bring the store out into the street." Seek opportunities for public/private outdoor spaces and public art. Temporary and permanent art installations will be considered as part of any redevelopment, events or marketing initiatives. Staff will look for opportunities to add public space in partnership with private redevelopment, and include public space where feasible as part of other public right of way projects. Summary of Comments Received for the Draft Hollins Center Plan March 6, 2020 - May 5, 2020 The following comments are summarized submittals from seventeen individuals; they are organized here by topic. The Plan itself Comments express generous appreciation and gratitude to the Roanoke County Planning Commission and Staff for the extensive planning process, ample community engagement and the quality of the Hollins Center Plan. The Plan is considered to be inclusive, and the document itself attractive and easy to understand. Prioritizing accessibility throughout the public realm in this Plan is appreciated. Comments are overwhelmingly in support of adoption of the Hollins Center Plan as an amendment to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. There is a sense that if attention is not focused on Hollins in the near future the area will be left out of new economic growth and opportunities. Public Amenities and Community Building Comments express excitement about the possibility of Hollins becoming a true community center as well as an enhanced gateway to Roanoke County. There is strong support for building walkability throughout the area with trails and sidewalks to and from residential areas to retail, restaurants and community destinations. A trail connection from the study area to the Carvins Cove trail, extension of the Tinker Creek Greenway, and trail connections linking the public parks and the library are all priorities. Improving parks and playgrounds near the study area is supported. Comments support streetscape amenities including sidewalks, outdoor dining, benches, public art, planters and lighting. Residents consider Hollins to be the County's college town area, and would like Hollins University to collaborate with Roanoke County to build charm and vitality similar to college downtowns. Placemaking elements such as using Northside High School and Hollins University school colors in streetscape elements, as well as enhanced views of the surrounding mountains are desired. Preservation of natural resources countywide is considered vital for tourism and business attraction. Residents state that preserving natural resources and scenic views of the surrounding mountains will improve quality of life in Hollins and attract new businesses and residents. Destinations Residents would like for Hollins to have an expanded grocery, more retail variety, restaurants, apartments and public and private spaces. They would like to see the Williamson Road corridor be home to more local businesses as well as a mixed use development that includes a new library. New infrastructure and incentives could encourage ADA compliant housing for low income people with disabilities. Comments support a more densely developed interchange at Interstate 81 /Exit 146 that boasts trendy local and national chain restaurants to serve both visitors and local residents. The Hollins Public Library is very popular, but patrons note the growing need for a modern facility. Transportation Comments regarding transportation were less in concurrence. There is concern about the need for sound barriers with possible expansion of Interstate 81; some like roundabouts while others do not. Some feel that Williamson Road is too congested while others want to see more activity along the corridor. There is concern about heavy truck traffic using Williamson Road. Comments state that there is lack of traffic enforcement in the area, leading to frequent speeding and running of red lights. Residents would appreciate coordination between the traffic lights in the area. Several commenters stated that public transportation is important to attract new businesses and provide options for employees and residents travelling in and out of the Hollins area. One comment asked for a U.S. Route 1 1 transportation corridor study from Hollins to Cloverdale and beyond. While in support of greenways, one resident expressed opposition to the town center redevelopment concept based on possible increased vehicle congestion. Future Land Use The future land use discussion in the Plan evoked questions about the extent of mixed use and preservation of the surrounding single family neighborhoods. Comments Received for the Draft Hollins Center Plan March 6, 2020 -May 5, 2020 Comments received via Survey Monkey I'm very excited about Hollins being improved. I hope you will consider bringing the improvements/bike/pedestrian paths all the way down to wood Haven road. There are a lot of residential in this area that is part of Hollins but feels left out from the improvements. It would also be great to be able to access the new mixed area without using vehicle. I hope Hollins will encourage a business plan that makes way for Kroger to expand. This store is the anchor to business and needs expansion, not more competition. I'm glad to see ADA in this plan. Why not fix what is not working, before starting new projects? You spent millions of dollars on a walk way that is not used much, but you cannot improve public transportation and low income housing for people with disabilities. I really hope to see more options for disabled individuals in all of these plans. Everything has to be wide enough, and level for wheelchairs. No gravel anywhere! The plan is of professional quality and I appreciate all of the work and research that must have gone into it. I am excited about the possibility of Hollins becoming a true town center, as I think it's what our area desperately needs. I am most interested in the development of greenways and the possibility of having walk -able shop locations and making the community here more of a destination. I think it is ridiculous to put this center in this area. It is already getting too congested with traffic. You sight in the plan that there have been increased traffic and bike accidents in this area. Use common sense. You should go out further on the other side of Hollins College where there is more open land. You should focus on the greenways that everyone enjoys. Professional, high quality work put into this plan. The Summary is informative but user friendly with vibrant, easy to read graphics. Excited for improvements in this portion of the County! It's awesome! Love the graphic -rich "USA Today" version. There should be more direct access to Carvins Cove and there should be a trail from Carvins Cove connecting it to Hollins College, Walrond Park, and Hollins Library. There seems to be a lot of apartments being built off of Airport Road, but it would be nice if some of that development was closer to the college in this center that would bring in shops, restaurants, grocery stores. Don't build any round -a -abouts on the main roads, like at VA Western! The Hollins Community plan offers hope to this area that hasn't been given the attention and development it deserves with its surrounding Mountain View's, university, and proximity to 81. The new sidewalk was a great start by the county but I'd like to see tables with seating and lighting on the next sidewalks if built. I would like to see the new brick welcome sign have a place to advertise community events. The planters at the end of the new sidewalk need some TLC. The planters near Kroger and Dunkin Donuts need TLC too. It would be nice to see the county help attract something to the Aldi grocery store property and help develop the areas from Hollins College to CVS and near 81. Incentives for more local places like Lew's and Hollywood's would be lovely. Incentives to keep our landmark local restaurants like Lew's and Hollywood's open post COVID-19 would be great, too. This is the county's college town area, let's put in some effort to give it charm like Downtown Salem/Radford/Blacksburg. Some flowers and people on the sidewalks would be a nice start. This area should be the best 81 exit from Staunton to Christiansburg. Instead of a new library it would be nice to see a community center that includes a library. The Hollins plan is a well rounded plan that people of all of all ages and backgrounds should comprehend well. The plan "summary" document is beautiful and is a nice outline for folks who didn't and will not follow this whole process. The graphics will help keep peoples attention while reading the document. I would like to see collaboration with Hollins University to make this entire area feel less industrial and more like a college corridor. School pride using all of the greens (green crosswalks in the virtual photos are nice), but more green stoplight posts, street lights, and light pole banners would be pretty and show support to Hollins/Northside. I'd also like to see more Hollins signs, specifically something that doesn't look like you are entering the county like the brick one. Something to make the area feel like home for residents and students, yet something that visitors and parents would want to take photos with. Northside Middle/High and Hollins University all have wonderful art departments, so it would be wonderful to see some art in this area, especially on the new asphalt sidewalk in front of the Envelope plant and near the university entrance. I feel like Botetourt, Salem, and Christiansburg have done a nice job getting people to stop at their 81 exits. It would be nice if Roanoke County could get some local and national chains to develop at the interstate exit to make this area more trendy (Tropical Smoothie, Chick-fil-A, Panera Bread, Chipotlee would be popular with the university students). There seems to be room near the gas stations and McDonalds for plenty of growth. Building housing here would also be closer than Daleville for commuters to drive to downtown. This area is more traveled by out of towners than Valley View and is one of only 2(?) 81 exits in the county. It would be great to expand the tax base here while helping keep the Camping store and hotels in business. Perhaps even a conference center/event venue now that the big one off Hershberger has closed. There's not many options that are easy to get to that aren't downtown. I see landscaping in the virtual photos. It would be nice to have better landscaping near Kroger and CVS. Both of these areas could be really pretty, considering the views provided by our surrounding mountains. Will there ever be easier/more direct roads to Carvins Cove from this "center'? Comments received via Email (Before the Public Hearing) Ed Brennan, Resident I have reviewed the draft Hollins Center Plan (Plan) and I have a few concerns that I did not see addressed in the Plan. Williamson Road is already inadequate for the volume and commercial vehicle use of traffic as it is, and increasing the volume and use will only make the problem worse. The speed limit on Williamson Road is poorly enforced by the Roanoke County Police Department (RCPD). Vehicles traveling from east to west from about St. Philip's Lutheran Church through the intersection with La Marre Drive continually speed through the 45 MPH section, do not decrease speed where the speed limit decreases to 35 MPH, and frequently drive through the red light at the intersection (traveling in both directions). I witness this on a daily basis. RCPD monitors speed from the vacant lot between J Moore & Company PC and Marson Road about 99 percent of the time, and from the Enon Baptist Church parking lot about 1 percent of the time. After I submitted a speed monitoring request online RCPD monitored speed from the median just east of Hollins Court Drive for three mornings. I witnessed multiple vehicles get stopped for speeding each of those three days in just the few minutes that I traveled through this area. Yet, I have not seen the RCPD monitor speed from that location since. The traffic light at the intersection of Williamson Road and La Marre Drive is faulty. A vehicle can be waiting at the red light to exit Hollins University well before another vehicle gets to the same red light from La Marre Drive, yet the light will always turn green first for the vehicle coming from La Marre Drive. On numerous occasions, I have been waiting at the red light to exit Hollins University and the light will not change to green. The Plan makes no allowance for adding a traffic light at Hollins Court Drive. A vehicle turning left (west) from Hollins Court Drive has to cross two lanes of traffic to enter one of the two west bound lanes. This is already unsafe due to the continuous speeding issue described above. Increasing the volume of traffic and not adding a traffic light at Hollins Court Drive will make traveling into and out of this residential street even more unsafe. I trust that my above concerns will be considered and addressed in the final Plan. Valerie Brooke Stephens, Resident I wish to please submit the following comments for the Planning Commission public hearing on May 5, 2020 concerning proposed incorporation of the Hollins Center Plan (Reimagine Hollins) into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please kindly reply to this email and let me know if it has been received and will be referred to all the members of the Planning Commission for consideration of public comments for the public hearing this evening, May 5, 2020. Thank you. I agree with most of the recommendations, and the proposals for implementation of those recommendations, of the Hollins Center Plan, and think that incorporation of the Hollins Center Plan into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan would be an improvement for the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. I would appreciate please just to ask some questions and make the comments below concerning the Hollins Center Plan for a few concerns and questions I have regarding the Hollins Center Plan. Per information on the Hollins Center Plan - Draft 3-15 page concerning Community Engagement/Engagement Results, the following information is stated: "Future Land Use Scenarios Three future land use (FLU) scenarios were presented at the Draft Plan Reveal meetings. Two scenarios recommended changing property within the study area to a Mixed Use FLU designation. The online survey and public meetings results followed the same order (combined here): • Full Mixed Use (56%) • Partial Mixed Use (38%) • No Change (6%)" As noted above, the overwhelming choice (56%) of the participants at the Draft Plan Reveal meetings was for the Full Mixed Use future land use (FLU) designation scenario for property within the study area. However, the recommendations for the Hollins Center Plan to be incorporated into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan would instead implement only the Partial Mixed Use scenario (see maps on Hollins Center Plan - Draft 3-9 page for details) for property within the study area. I have this question: Why is it being recommended to amend the county's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to change only the southern portion of the study area to a Mixed Use designation when it is clear that the overwhelming majority of participants at the Draft Plan Reveal meetings preferred the Full Mixed Use designation for significantly much more of the property within the study area than just only for the southern portion? Please see maps on Hollins Center Plan - Draft 3-9 page for comparison and details. Please also note the following information: "Residentially -zoned properties make up 23% of the study area." See info and details on Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-11 page. Please also see the Map 2-9 for Existing Conditions/Land Use and Housing, on Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-7 page. Please also see Map 2-12 for Existing Conditions/Land Use and Housing, on Hollins Center Plan -Draft 2-10 page. Please note the following information on Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-12 page that: "Non -conforming land use refers to uses that were allowed under previous zoning regulations but are no longer allowed by the current zoning regulations.... There are numerous residential uses occurring on parcels zoned for 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial and C-2 High Intensity Commercial (see Figure 2-15)." There are at least 14 parcels for single family homes that were allowed for residential land use under previous zoning regulations but apparently must have been changed at some point in the past to either C-2 High Intensity Commercial or 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial zoning designations. I have these questions: Would it not be more fair to the property owners of these single family homes to restore the R-1 Residential zoning for their properties? Also, what provisions are there for protection and conservation of residentially zoned properties and neighborhoods in the study area of the Hollins Center Plan and nearby? Please note that, per Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-8 page, for Existing Land Use, that: "Residential uses include 15.7% as single-family homes, and 2.2% as multi -family duplex and triplex." As mentioned above, there are also currently at least 14 single family home parcels, being used for residential uses, that are located on properties that were previously zoned residential in the past but which were changed at some point to commercial or industrial zoning designations (whether these changes were done with or without any input from the single family home owners is not clear). Also, per Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-9 page, regarding surrounding neighborhoods of the study area, "The commercial corridors of the Hollins Center study area are adjacent to residential neighborhoods and Hollins University. The Hollins Center study area is surrounded primarily by single-family neighborhoods..." Please see Map 2-11 on Hollins Center Draft 2-9 page. I have these questions: What provisions and protections will there be for residential home owners in the study area for the Hollins Center Plan and also for the surrounding residential areas of the study area? What will be done to conserve and protect residential neighborhoods in, near, and surrounding the study area of the Hollins Center Plan? I attended and participated in the community engagement meetings and activities regarding "Reimagine Hollins" that were offered to the public, and I thank the Planning Commission and Roanoke County staff and employees who made those meetings and activities possible and available to the public. It was apparent to me from attending the various meetings for public input for the drafting of the Hollins Center Plan, that the overwhelming majority of those persons attending those meetings and activities strongly favored: 1. Increased pedestrian accommodations for safely walking in the study area, such as sidewalks, and greenways, and for pedestrian accommodations so that persons in existing residential neighborhoods in or near the study area could safely walk or bicycle to retail and commercial areas in the study area and to businesses and work places in the study area. 2. Increased public transportation options for the study area, such as buses and public transit, which would help support economic growth in the study area and provide ways to link businesses and work places with the public and with their employees. The Hollins area is the largest employment center in Roanoke County, but lacks public transportation and transit availability, which is crucial for economic growth. See the Hollins Center Plan - Draft 2-29 page which states: "There is currently no fixed -route transit service in the Hollins area." If Roanoke County wants to attract people to live and work in the Hollins area, and to attract new businesses to locate in the Hollins area, then public transportation and transit options are extremely important. 3. Preserve and protect the irreplaceable natural resources in and near the study area, such as Tinker Creek, the mountains, Carvins Cove, the Appalachian Trail, etc. These resources are vital for attracting tourism and businesses that benefit and depend on tourism, and in attracting businesses that promote clean and green technologies, and in attracting the businesses of the future with good paying jobs. We have an obligation to future generations in Roanoke County to preserve and protect these priceless natural resources that are the heritage of all Roanoke County residents and which are so important for the quality of life for everyone in Roanoke County. Preserving these natural resources and preserving scenic views of the surrounding and nearby mountains will make Roanoke County an area that will attract newcomers to come live here and new businesses to locate here. 4. Improve parks and playgrounds in the study area and link parks when possible by greenways, walking paths, trails, etc. Pave the existing walking path/trail at Hollins Park to make it accessible to disabled walkers. 5. Rebuild the Hollins Public Library, which has an aging building that no longer can meet the demands and needs of our citizens and the public, and which is out of date and not energy efficient. There were many days last year that the humidity level in the library indicated that the air conditioning and cooling systems were not working properly, and which not only made the library uncomfortable for patrons and staff, but also risked damaging the materials in the library, such as the books, computers, audiovisual equipment, videos and DVDs, etc., as heat and humidity are not conducive for preserving such items. The usage of the Hollins Public Library is among the highest of all the Roanoke County libraries, and the staff does a great job, but the building is increasingly woefully inadequate to meet the needs of a modern library which the usage of the library requires. 6. Improve the landscaping and visual attractiveness of Williamson Road and Plantation Road to help attract more visitors to the businesses there and also to attract more new businesses. Promote a village center type of development and aesthetic that is pedestrian friendly and walkable and is accessible to walkers and bicyclists. 7. Form partnerships with Hollins University that can benefit the Hollins area and Roanoke County as a whole. This is a potential that is not being utilized. Steve Grammer, Advocate for people with disabilities Everything has to be ADA accessible. What opportunities will this bring, for people with disabilities? Before beginning new projects, you need to fix what is broken first. Liz Belcher, Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator I am in agreement with a lot of the recommendations of the Hollins Center Plan and think that implementation of many of its recommendations will definitely be a great improvement for the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Thank you to the Planning Commission staff and Roanoke County employees for all their hard work, dedication, and service for developing the Hollins Center Plan. I also greatly appreciate the meetings, activities, surveys and opportunities for input that were made available to the public during the development of the Hollins Center Plan and thank everyone who assisted with those and made that possible. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Hollins Center Plan. I attended some, but not all, of the meetings and have discussed the plan with several people. The graphics and layout for the plan are very nicely done, public involvement was extensive, and comments were well incorporated into the plan. 1. 1 support the inclusion of bicycle/pedestrian/greenway facilities in the plan. 2. 1 support the concept of improving the Hollins area to be more of a gateway to Roanoke County. 3. 1 support most of the implementation recommendations, particularly: a. completion of Tinker Creek Greenway, and b. completion of the US. 1 1 transportation corridor study from Hollins to Cloverdale and beyond (p.5-8). I believe the plan could be further improved now or at some future date. 4. Completion of the plan and the focus on the "Hollins Center" appear to be driven by economic development opportunities and concerns. In my mind, the plan could benefit from additional economic analysis. The water and sewer maps are good, but it would be nice to have some additional information, such as are the utilities adequate and are all properties within service range. We have a map of agricultural/vacant lands, but no map of underutilized or empty buildings. We have extensive transportation information, but very little employment data and no list of work force job skills that existing businesses have difficulty filling. We have significant citizen input wanting more restaurants, but no analysis of how many restaurants are in the center and the greater Hollins area. Additional economic and real estate information might reveal opportunities or constraints. 5. The study area is narrowly focused to the Hollins Center, but clearly the public thought of this as an "area" plan, not a plan for a commercial or village center. Thus, it is important in the introduction to frame this plan within the context of other plans. Is the older Hollins Area Plan for a larger geographic area? Are there other neighborhood plans that take into consideration the surrounding residential, university, and park properties? Much of the information, existing conditions, input, and recommendations in this plan are beyond the study area boundaries. In what plan should this outside information be included? 6. The last paragraph on page 2-17 is a good explanation for how Hollins got to be the way it is. It seems like this paragraph would be well included in the introduction - this is how we developed from a rural area to an auto -centric area, which we would like to see become more liveable and sustainable in the future. I encourage you to continue to protect what is good about Hollins - the views, the location, the history, the neighborhoods - so that it can continue to be important to the future of Roanoke County. Comment received via Call (During the Public Hearing) Mary Terry, Property Owner I own property next to Hollins University. Hollins University had been interested in buying our property. I've attended some meetings over the years. I want the Planning Commission to vote for the plan because everything is changing so fast that if they don't vote for their plan they'll be left out. Comment received via Email (During the Public Hearing) Martie and David Byrd, Caroline Byrd, Residents Thanks for the hard work. We are 20+ year residents and have enjoyed seeing the growth. Questions: With expansion of 81, will sound buffers be added for neighborhoods which border 81 in this area? We live in Buckland Forest. How will businesses be incentivized to come to this area? Comment received via Email (After the Public Hearing) Charles Foster As new residents to this area, we are pleased that you have developed a 10 to 20 year vision for the Hollins area. We are currently viewing your meeting online and have read the proposed draft plan. We like what we see. One item we would like for you to consider is a sidewalk on Plantation Road that extends south of the intersection of Plantation and Williamson Roads. My wife and I are both avid walkers and we walk approximately 4 miles on a daily basis; the issue is that we must contend with the traffic without sidewalks. There is a berm but it is narrow and has caused a hazard for us. We have also seen this with walkers and bicyclists who travel past our home on a very frequent basis. Your consideration of this matter would be greatly appreciated. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2020 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: INCORPORATING THE DRAFT HOLLINS CENTER PLAN (DATED MARCH 5, 2020) WHEREAS, § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission of every jurisdiction shall prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical development of their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, § 15.2-2230 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission shall review the comprehensive plan at least once every five years to determine whether it is advisable to amend the plan; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to incorporate the Draft Hollins Center Plan (dated March 5, 2020) into the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Draft Hollins Center Plan was posted on the County's web page on March 6, 2020, and allowed for public comments up to and including the public hearing on May 5, 2020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on May 5, 2020, after posting, advertisement and notices as required by § 15.2-2225 and § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia; I NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) The Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors amend the Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the Draft Hollins Center Plan, dated March 5, 2020, as amended, into the Comprehensive Plan. 2) Pursuant to § 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary to the Planning Commission shall certify this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors by providing a copy of it to the Clerk to the Board. 3) Pursuant to § 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, the Secretary to the Planning Commission shall also post this Resolution on the Commission's website. Commissioners absent None Votes in favor Bower, Henderson, McMurray, Woltz, James Votes against None Abstentions None CERTIFICATION The undersigned secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Commission does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, complete and correct Resolution adopted by a vote of a majority of the Roanoke County Planning Commissioners, present at a regular meeting of the Commission held on May 5, 2020, at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, and that the same has not been amended or rescinded and is in full force and effect as of the date of this certification, May 5, 2020. Philip 7fompson, Secret , Roaryffke County Planning Commission 2 Page 1 of 2 Philip Thompson - [EXTERNAL] - Re: Board of Supervisors to hold Public Hearing for Hollins Center Plan From: Steve <spgkws@yahoo.com> To: Philip Thompson <pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 7/13/2020 1:03 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Board of Supervisors to hold Public Hearing for Hollins Center Plan hello my questions are how has covid delayed this project and what steps are the county doing to protect the disabled community ? Sincerely, Steve Grammer- Graduate of Partners in Policymaking 2013, Advocate for people with disabilities. On Monday, July 13, 2020, 08:00:46 AM EDT, Philip Thompson <pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov> wrote: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 28 to incorporate the Hollins Center Plan into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The public hearing will be broadcast live, so members of the public may view the meeting on Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV3) - Channel 3 or online on the Roanoke County website. Due to the present state of emergency associated with the Coronavirus (COVID-19), we urge you to participate through electronic means rather than attend the meeting in person. Hollins CENTER 41 j Read the Draft Plan file:///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/5F005B 8BPO2_DOMAINM... 7/22/2020 Page 2 of 2 Prior to and during the public hearing, citizens may share comments by email or by phone (540-776-7278). Please include your name and address. Comments will be read aloud during the meeting, subject to reasonable time limitations. Hollins Center Plan Background Since 2018, over 800 people have participated in the Plan's development and helped create the vision of a beautiful, dynamic and inclusive community center in Hollins. The Planning Commission recommended that the Board adopt the Plan at their public hearing on May 5. Image: Hollins Center Plan Recommendations Map County of Roanoke, Virginia 1 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA 24018 Unsubscribe soakws@vahoo.com Update Profile I About Constant Contact Sent by pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov in collaboration with Constant Contactx, .0AV Try email marketing for free today! WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. file:///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/5F005B 8BPO2_DOMAINM... 7/22/2020 Page 1 of 2 Philip Thompson - [EXTERNAL] - Re: Board of Supervisors to hold Public Hearing for Hollins Center Plan From: Steve <spgkws@yahoo.com> To: Philip Thompson <pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 7/13/2020 1:23 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Board of Supervisors to hold Public Hearing for Hollins Center Plan My address is 1817 Westview Ave. SW Roanoke VA 24016. Sincerely, Steve Grammer- Graduate of Partners in Policymaking 2013, Advocate for people with disabilities. On Monday, July 13, 2020, 01:02:51 PM EDT, Steve <spgkws@yahoo.com> wrote: hello my questions are how has covid delayed this project and what steps are the county doing to protect the disabled community ? Sincerely, Steve Grammer- Graduate of Partners in Policymaking 2013, Advocate for people with disabilities. On Monday, July 13, 2020, 08:00:46 AM EDT, Philip Thompson <pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov> wrote: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 28 to incorporate the Hollins Center Plan into the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Hollins CENTER Ill.- file:///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/5FOC606APO2_DOMAINM... 7/22/2020 Page 2 of 2 The public hearing will be broadcast live, so members of the public may view the meeting on Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV3) - Channel 3 or online on the Roanoke County website. Due to the present state of emergency associated with the Coronavirus (COVID-19), we urge you to participate through electronic means rather than attend the meeting in person. Prior to and during the public hearing, citizens may share comments by email or by phone (540-776-7278). Please include your name and address. Comments will be read aloud during the meeting, subject to reasonable time limitations. Read the Draft Plan Hollins Center Plan Background Since 2018, over 800 people have participated in the Plan's development and helped create the vision of a beautiful, dynamic and inclusive community center in Hollins. The Planning Commission recommended that the Board adopt the Plan at their public hearing on May 5. Image: Hollins Center Plan Recommendations Map County of Roanoke, Virginia 1 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA 24018 Unsubscribe spakws@vahoo.com Update Profile I About Constant Contact Sent by pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov in collaboration with Consfant Contact% o 06 Try email marketing for free today! WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. file:///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/5FOC606APO2_DOMAINM... 7/22/2020 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: INCORPORATING THE DRAFT (DATED MARCH 5, 2020) HOLLINS CENTER PLAN WHEREAS, § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia requires that every jurisdiction shall adopt a comprehensive plan for the physical development of their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, § 15.2-2230 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission review the comprehensive plan at least once every five years to determine whether it is advisable to amend the plan; and WHEREAS, the Draft Hollins Center Plan was posted on the County's web page on March 6, 2020, and allowed for public comments up to and during the Planning Commission's public hearing on May 5, 2020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on May 5, 2020, after posting, advertisement and notices as required by § 15.2-2225 and § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission proposed that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to incorporate the Draft Hollins Center Plan (dated March 5, 2020) into the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing with notice as required by § 15.2-2226 and § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, the Board duly considered the Draft Hollins Center Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 1 of 2 1) The Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by incorporating the Draft Hollins Center Plan, dated March 5, 2020, into the Comprehensive Plan, with the following two amendments: a. The future land use map shall be Version 2 labeled "Alternative Future Land Use Map", dated July 2020, and shall replace the future land use map in the Plan Summary's Land Use Recommendations and in Appendix 5 - Plan Recommendations and Implementation Strategies. b. The July 28, 2020 public hearing before the Board shall be included in the Plan's Community Engagement section. 2) That this Resolution is effective from and after July 28, 2020. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. Q.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: July 28, 2020 The petition of Wild Partners to obtain a special use permit in a C -2S (high intensity commercial) District with special use permit to operate a car wash facility on approximately 1. 152 acres, located at 4065 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District Philip Thompson Director of Planning Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance for a special use permit for a car wash. BACKGROUND: A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District The property is located within the study area of the 419 Town Center Plan In 2019, the Board of Supervisors incorporated the 419 Town Center Plan into the County's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of "Core" (where high intensity urban development is encouraged). However, the proposed use is not consistent with the mixed-use town center development type designated on the 419 Town Center Plan. The Comprehensive Plan serves as an advisory "guide" for future development, and does not necessarily bind the Board of Supervisors. Prior Special Use Permit on the Property In 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a special use permit for a fast food Page 1 of 4 restaurant and drive thru (Krispy Kreme) on this property with two conditions (concept plan conformance and landscaping plan conformance). Krispy Kreme never constructed the fast food restaurant and drive-thru on the property. As such, the 1999 special use permit was considered null and void two (2) years later for failure to commence the use contemplated by the special use permit pursuant to Section 30-19-4 of the Roanoke County Code. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on July 7, 2020. A total of four people provided comments on this application (two written comments received prior to the public hearing, one person who spoke at the public hearing, and one phone- in call during the 10 -minute recess period as part of the public hearing). Two people were opposed to the request while the other two had questions or concerns regarding the application. Concerns raised included congested traffic along Route 419 especially during the evening rush hour, difficulty turning left from Fallowater Extension onto Route 419, landscaping, stormwater management, the cross -access easement remaining on the property, the location of an existing car wash adjacent to this property, and that the car wash was not consistent with the 419 Town Center Plan, which calls for bikeable and walkable mixed-use development on the property. The applicant provided information on traffic impacts associated with a car wash, the Ultimate Shine Car Wash business model, the difference between full service car washes and express car washes, other locations in the area where Ultimate Shine Car Washes are located or being considered, other car wash locations in the region, and the property limitations in attracting other commercial uses. The Planning Commission discussed/had questions regarding: hours of operation (8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. - shorter hours during the winter); number of employees, retail component of the business, construction timeline (6 months); the Core future land use designation; and the 419 Town Center Plan. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit request for a car wash with five (5) conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Landscape Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to Page 2 of 4 any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The existing freestanding sign shall be removed. New freestanding signage shall be limited to one (1) monument style sign not to exceed five (5) feet in height and seven (7) feet in width with materials to match the building fagade. The freestanding sign shall not contain any LED, digital faces, or electronic message boards. 4. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 5. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. SAMPLE MOTIONS MOTION APPROVING I find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan's future land use designation of this property as Core (where high intensity urban development is encouraged); and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit with the following conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Landscape Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. Page 3 of 4 3. The existing freestanding sign shall be removed. New freestanding signage shall be limited to one (1) monument style sign not to exceed five (5) feet in height and seven (7) feet in width with materials to match the building fagade. The freestanding sign shall not contain any LED, digital faces, or electronic message boards. 4. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 5. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. MOTION DENYING I find that the proposed petition for a special use permit is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation of Core, but is not consistent with the mixed-use town center development type proposed by the 419 Town Center Plan (which was incorporated into the County's Comprehensive plan in 2019). I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the petition for a special use permit as it has been requested. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors deny the special use permit request for a car wash. Page 4 of 4 �ao� , �F ROANOKE COUNTY «: p Z_ z J a' ,ea8 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Rick James, Chairman Mr. Wayne Bower, Vice -Chairman Mr. Troy Henderson Mr. Kelly McMurray Mr. Jim Woltz Vinton District Hollins District Catawba District Cave Spring District Windsor Hills District TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2020 - 7;00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - WILD PARTNERS - ULTIMATE SHINE CAR WASH CALLER INFORMATION: NAME: kt , STREET ADDRESS: S9()9 �-406U U )(T-),fAIC_ SdtOV14 AI co nix.( u.4 L ,{ COMMENTS: - {'t�� �h "� r .�, A t��-�-- a�4-P,4 6,4 A f) n I + oc_xv-� cc k `- Q 4n Boa ctncou(-c�sqea 6�L_oA� vvc,&ed-ksr, Ir ( I11qa I 2) '�L -- C ca PO Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 * Phone (540) 772-2065 * Fax (540) 776-7155 Michael R. Bell, Manager Tanglewood Autowash Shell 4083 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 540-314-6357 accounting@tanglewood.roacoxmail.com July 6, 2020 Department of Community Development 5204 Bernard Drive SW Roanoke, VA 24018 planning@roanokecountyva.gov RE: Special Use Permit - 4065 Electric Road Dear members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission, We are a family owned and operated business located at 4083 Electric Rd. and have been an upstanding and active member of the Roanoke community for over thirty (30) years. We are addressing the board to express our opposition to the special use permit application for 4065 Electric Rd, which is adjacent to our business. There is a delicate balance of promoting sound economic competition in a fair market environment and protecting existing businesses contractual relations and viability. We understand that healthy competition is good for any free market, however the proposed car wash, within 500 feet of our business, could drastically reduce our customer base resulting in significant damage to our business. Over the years our business has been chipped away by an influx of automated car washes in the Roanoke Valley. There have been seven (7) in the last five (5) years, and three (3) in the last year alone. According to the national carwash industry, the customer base for a carwash is five (5) miles. That radius, with an average occupancy rate will support one (1) carwash, not two (2). There are currently two (2) automated car washes within a four (4) mile radius of our business, Loves Car Care (corner of Electric Rd and Colonial Ave) within two (2) miles and H2O Glo (Electric Rd.) at four (4) miles. The Electric Road corridor is already oversaturated with automated car washes. In addition, the proposed new car wash is positioned to intercept west to east traffic to our business, significantly diluting our customer base. We employ over thirty (30) people in our local community. We pay our business license, real estate, property and sales taxes every year. Our payroll dollars go right back to support the Roanoke Valley. The proposed car wash is based on a model that employs less than ten (10) people. Over the last 30 years we have hired many young people who have started their professional careers with us. We've even had several second generations of families come work for us. They learn the value of a diverse workplace by interacting with people of different ages, races, and nationalities. We have employees that advance their careers and some that stay here and retire. We've had fire fighters, police officers, professional athletes, doctors and nurses, and business owners that have gotten a start here. The longevity of our employees is nearly unprecedented in this industry. We've had cashiers retire after twenty-five (25) years, our manager has been employed for over thirty (30) years, our bookkeeper has been here for eighteen (18) years and several of our employees have been here ten (10) years or longer. We proudly support our local schools, charities, and civic organizations with various fundraisers and donations. We value being a part of this community and we want to be a part of it for a long time to come. We hope you, as board members, will support the vital interests of our long-established business, our loyal employees, and our opposition to this special use permit. Thank you for your consideration, The Tanglewood Autowash Family Brenda Dechow Greg Dechow Lauren Dechow Michael Bell Melanie Brown Makayla Bell Robyn Byrd Dawn Cagle Jonothan Crandall Stuart Ferguson Brandon Gandy Jordan Griffin David Hamblin Fletcher Holland Jacob Holmes Levi Holmes AJ Johnson Kathy Lara Brandon Martin Bethany McCloe Abigail Olvera Marcus Morton Gwen Mowles Jacob Pardon Aaron Porter Adam Richardson Jason Snow Jacob Snow Morgan Stone Greg Story Christian Strom Jackson Tresky Landon Wheeler Samantha Williams STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Wild Partners - Ultimate Shine Car Wash Request: To obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1.15 acres zoned C -2S, High Intensity Commercial, District with special use permit Location: 4065 Electric Road Magisterial District: Cave Spring Suggested Conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash - Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. - Landscape Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The existing freestanding sign shall be removed. New freestanding signage shall be limited to one (1) monument style sign not to exceed five (5) feet in height and seven (7) feet in width with materials to match the building fagade. The freestanding sign shall not contain any LED, digital faces, or electronic message boards. 4. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 5. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Wild Partners - Ultimate Shine Car Wash is requesting to obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1. 15 acres at 4065 Electric Road. The submitted concept plan shows the development of one car wash building with exterior vacuums, parking, and supporting facilities. The existing structures shall be removed. The site is designated Core on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and located within the 419 Town Center Plan area of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway - oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Car washes are an appropriate use within the Core future land use designation. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution to incorporate the 419 Town Center Plan into Roanoke County's Comprehensive Plan on July 23, 2019. The proposed project is in not consistent with the mixed-use town center development type. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a Car Wash as "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self-service car washes." A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2 zoning district. Section 30-85-10 (attached) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains the following use and design standards for a Car Wash: All new car wash facilities, whether conveyor operated or self-service, shall be equipped with a water recycling system for eighty-five (85) percent of the water used. Development of the site would require comprehensive site plan review(s) and building permit review(s). ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — In 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a special use permit for a fast food restaurant and drive- thru (Krispy Kreme) on this property with two conditions (concept plan conformance and landscaping plan conformance). These conditions would not apply to the development of this site for a car wash. Topography/Vegetation — The site rises several feet from the Route 419/Electric Road streetscape and then is a gentle slope away from Route 419 until the back of the property, which has a retaining wall on the Chuck E. Cheese hillside. The property is not in a floodplain overlay district or within a FEMA defined floodway and floodplain. The site has an existing 6,338-sqare foot restaurant building (formerly Rancho Viejo), exterior patio, surrounding asphalt parking lot, minimal landscaping, and two freestanding signs (Rancho Viejo for 4065 Electric Rd and Chuck E. Cheese for 4059 Electric Rd). Surrounding Neighborhood — The surrounding zoning of the subject parcel is C-2 - High Intensity Commercial zoning (along Electric Road — Route 419). Other nearby zoning includes C-1 Low Intensity Commercial zoning (at the end of Emma Lane), and R-3 Medium Density Multi -Family Residential zoning (at the top of the ridge behind Chuck E. Cheese). The surrounding uses include mostly commercial uses, vacant commercial properties, and vacant medium density multi -family properties. The surrounding commercial uses include, but are not limited to, stores, restaurants, gas stations, hotels, offices, and a car wash. Route 419 Widening, Safety, and Multimodal Improvements Project Electric Road - Route 419 has a $6.5 million Widening, Safety, and Multimodal Improvements Phase 1 project beginning this summer (2020) by the Virginia Department of Transportation from the Roanoke County line at Route 220 to Ogden Road. The congested area of Route 419, Electric Road, near Tanglewood Mall will be improved with an additional southbound travel lane, plus bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Improvements include: 1.) Adding one southbound, outside lane from Ogden Road to Route 220, Franklin Road, which will become southbound exit lane. 2.) Adding pedestrian crosswalks and signals at Ogden Road, Elm View Road and South Peak Boulevard. 3.) Adding sidewalks on the opposite side of the street from Ogden Road to South Peak Boulevard. 4.) Adding sidewalks on the Tanglewood Mall side from Ogden Road through the Route 220 underpass. 5.) Consolidating three bus stops into one bus shelter. 6.) Reducing pavement widths and add bicycle lanes to outside of the travel lanes. Phase 2 of the project is proposed from Ogden Road to Starkey Road with improvements that include an additional northbound and southbound travel lane, plus bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. It appears that the proposed Ultimate Shine Car Wash concept plan and concept landscaping plan allows space for Phase 2 of the Route 419 2 Widening, Safety, and Multimodal Improvements Project, including the sidewalks. Fallowater Lane Extension This road project starts at Route 419 and will upgrade the private driveway to Chuck E Cheese to public road standards. A new road segment will be constructed between the end of the private driveway and Almond Road, an existing private road. Almond Road will be rebuilt to public road standards to the intersection with Chevy Road, an existing public road. As future development takes place, an extension from the Fallowater Lane/Almond Road intersection to Elm View Road could be constructed as part of the development plan. The overall project, as recommended in the draft 419 Town Center Plan, proposes to extend Fallowater Lane from its current terminus at Starkey Road and Fallowater Lane (on the Food Lion side of Old Country Plaza) to a new intersection at Route 419. Fallowater Lane will then continue up a private driveway, past Chuck E Cheese, to eventually terminate at Elm View Road. This connection will provide appropriate access to future multifamily development anticipated for the land designated as The Ridges in the draft 419 Town Center Plan. It appears that the proposed Ultimate Shine Car Wash concept plan and concept landscaping plan allows space for the Fallowater Lane Extension project, including the sidewalks. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The submitted concept plan shows one (1) car wash building measuring 3,945 square feet, 30.0' wide, 138.5' in length, and 28.63' tall. The car wash building is located on the Kentucky Fried Chicken (4057 Electric Rd) side of the property and will include one (1) 20' wide drive through lane, and 10' wide of supporting facilities on the side. The car wash pay station is three (3) lanes wide along the Route 419 — Electric Road frontage. There is a paved waiting queue to get into the pay stations at the corner of Electric Road and Fallowater Lane Extension. Also, there is a paved waiting queue in between the pay stations and the car wash building (with a bypass lane to the exit). There are 33 total parking spaces, with 24 being covered vacuum stations (in the center of the property) and 9 being additional and employee parking (in rear of the property against the hillside). A landscaped island is within the queue near the front of the property and landscaped medians surround the parking lot. Access/Traffic Circulation — As shown on the concept plan, there would be two access points to the property. These access points would be off of the existing Chuck E. Cheese private driveway access road (to be transformed into Fallowater Lane Extension), approximately where the existing access points are into the existing Rancho Viejo parking lot. The existing cross access easement linking the Fallowater Lane Extension project to Kentucky Fried Chicken (4057 Electric Rd), Sleep Inn (4045 Electric Road), and Atalantis Blvd will remain in the parking lot (slightly adjusted to the southeast). VDOT has reviewed the application and will require a minor traffic study for possible impacts to the surrounding streets. This would be required for any development on this site regardless of the rezoning. Agency Comments — Various agencies commented on the submitted concept plan. The following comments were provided by the various agencies on this request: Building Safety: The Office of Building Safety stated that the construction will need to meet all the requirements of the current Uniform Statewide Building Code. Solid Waste: Solid Waste indicated they would provide garbage collection to this commercial address, as long as volume does not exceed 3 - 95 gallon containers. The cans would have to be pulled down to Electric Road. If the volume of trash would exceed the limit imposed by the ordinance and therefore the owner will have to acquire a private dumpster. The property's former occupant did not receive Roanoke County Solid Waste service. Fire & Rescue: Fire & Rescue does not object to the project as it will not increase the service they provide and stated it will address access and fire flow requirements during the site plan review process. Economic Development: The Economic Development Department recognizes the current state of the economy and the need for new redevelopment projects along the 419 corridor, and notes that desired uses are in limited demand at this time. The proposed development and special use permit request by Ultimate Shine Car Wash is not in alignment with the vision outlined in the 419 Plan to redevelop the Corridor for a mixed use Town Center, with a diversity of retail uses that support the area's economic interests, market demand and development potential. Further, the proposed use is not the highest and best use of the property, where significant investment in infrastructure is occurring for future development at this intersection. Given that the site is immediately adjacent to an existing car wash, it is anticipated that the project could displace higher value added investment in the corridor, which would strengthen the County's economic base and tax revenues. While economic development encourages redevelopment projects on Route 419, the proposed use and current economic conditions limit the range of possibilities, and as such the department offers neither support or denial for the request. Stormwater Operations: The Stormwater Operations Manager stated that the proposed re -development is not in a special flood hazard area designated by FEMA. VDOT: VDOT had six comments on the request: 1.) A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of-way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2.) The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes but is not limited to commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3.) Sidewalks placed within the right of way must adhere to ADA standards. 4.) A TIA may be required to show how traffic generated by this site will affect traffic flow on Electric Road. 5.) VDOT Project #9999-080-926, C501 is adjacent to this project. This development should plan to coordinate with the project if approved. There is also a potential project planned along Route 419 (Electric Road) along the frontage. This project is not approved or funded but conceptual - plans have been developed. This development should also coordinate as much as possible with the conceptual plans for the potential project. 6.) The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The County's Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger - scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Car washes are an appropriate use within the Core future land use designation. The proposed project is in conformance with the Core future land use designation. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution to incorporate the 419 Town Center Plan into Roanoke County's Comprehensive Plan on July 23, 2019. Over the course of the planning study, a dynamic new urban design framework emerged that calls for a highly walkable and bikeable mixed-use district that connects to the neighborhoods around it. The 419 Town Center Plan has 5 principles: 1.) Harness the power of our location and market strengths to enhance the Town Center's livability. 2.) Create an authentic place. 3.) Improve connectivity. 4.) Celebrate the Town Center's 4 nature and the corridor's natural setting. 5.) Promote a sense of community and inclusion. The 419 Town Center Plan focuses on creating a public realm with the following goals: create new public gathering spaces, add streetscape amenities, activate the public realm, improve lighting, introduce stronger landscape standards, and enhance gateways. The proposed Ultimate Shine Car Wash concept plan and concept landscaping plan will include streetscape landscaping, improve lighting, and introduce a stronger landscape palette on the property. The 419 Town Center Plan incorporates an urban design framework for six development types including auto - oriented, arterial infill, mixed-use office, mall retrofit, mixed-use town center, and multifamily. 4065 Electric Road, the location of the proposed Ultimate Shine Car Wash, is planned for a mixed-use town center development type in the 419 Town Center Plan. The mixed-use town center developments include retail and/or people oriented commercial (for example, a bank or real estate office) on the first floor with housing above. This can also include office space. The development focuses on a public open space. The proposed project is not consistent with the mixed-use town center development type. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Wild Partners — Ultimate Shine Car Wash is requesting to obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1. 15 acres at 4065 Electric Road. The submitted concept plan shows the development of one car wash building with exterior vacuums, parking, and supporting facilities. The proposed use of Car Wash by Wild Partners — Ultimate Shine Car Wash is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation of Core, but is not consistent with the mixed-use town center development type proposed by the 419 Town Center Plan. When reviewing a special use permit adverse impacts shall be considered as well as the design, scale, use and operation of any proposed use and how well the proposed use conforms to the County's Comprehensive Plan as well as the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. Due to the project being inconsistent with the 419 Town Center Plan, staff recommends denying this request; however, if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed project, staff has suggested several conditions for the special use permit dealing with concept plan conformance, landscaping plan conformance, signage, architectural rendering conformance, and dumpster enclosure screening should be considered. CASE NUMBER: 3-7/2020 PREPARED BY: Alexander Jones HEARING DATES: PC: 7/7/20 ATTACHMENTS: Application Landscape Concept Plan 5-8-2020 Aerial Map Utilities Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Photographs C-2 District Standards BOS: 7/28/20 Car Wash Use & Design Standards (Section 30-85-10) Core Future Land Use Description 419 Town Center Plan Sections Public Comments Jonathan Yates Director of Real Estate Acquisitions Ultimate Shine Car Wash (540) 808-7410 jyates@ultimateshinecarwash.com mnAME SHINE I de May 81h, 2020 Department of Community Development — Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 plan n i ng @ roa n c kec ou ntyv a . gov Re: Special Use Application — 4055 Electric Road To whom it may concern: Please find attached herewith our Special Use Application and supporting documents for Tax Parcel No. 087.07-01-50.00-0000. Our request for Special Use is to permit the construction and operation of an automated car wash. The site is currently developed as a full-service sit-down restaurant (currently vacant) of approximately 6,338 square feet. The existing site improvements will be demolished to support the new Car Wash. We are aware of the County's plans to make improvements for Fallowater Lane Extension and have incorporated these proposed improvements into our Concept Plan. We are also aware of the County's 419 Corridor and 419 Town Center Plan and we believe our proposal is compatible with the key components of these comprehensive planning documents. Should there be any questions please give me a call at (540) 808-741.0. Sincerely, Jonathan Yates County of Roanoke oti �o^Noy Community Development Planning & Zoning P 2 a. 2 5204 Bernard Drive P83� P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 �-z-.ac�asool For Staff Use Only Date received: Received y: LRezoning JQSpecial Use []Variance CWaiver DAdministrative Appeal []Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: (423) 581-5639 Application fee: PC/BZA d Morristown, TN 37814 Fax No.: Owner's name/address whip Phone #: (540) 915-3926 Placards issued: BOS date: Roanoke, VA 24012 Property Location Case Number 3 — a ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) LRezoning JQSpecial Use []Variance CWaiver DAdministrative Appeal []Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: (423) 581-5639 Wild Partners Work: 225 W 1 St N Street #102 Cell #: (540) 808-7410 Morristown, TN 37814 Fax No.: Owner's name/address whip Phone #: (540) 915-3926 Electric Fidelity Investments, LLC Work:. 1602 W. Raritan Road Fax No. #: Roanoke, VA 24012 Property Location Magisterial District: Cave Spring 4065 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Community Planning area: 419 Town Center Plan Tax Map No.: 087.07-01-50.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C2S - High Intensity Commercial Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.152 Existing Land Use: Full - Service Restaurant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-22.2) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C2S - High Intensity Commercial W/Special Use Proposed Land Use: Commercial - Car Wash Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No F IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes X No F IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes _1 No ❑ i VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/WICP V/AA R/S/W/CP WAA RIS/WICP V/AA X Consultation X 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application X Metes and bounds description EX Proffers, if applicable Justification N/A Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent Fthe owner. Owner's Signature N JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN .(15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Wild Partners, GP - DBA: Ultimate Shine Car Wash The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The request furthers the purpose of the Roanoke County Ordinance 34-54-1 by locating commercial activity along an established commercial corridor which serves large segments of the county's population. This is furthered by utilizing a property that is currently zoned C2S and has shown historical precedent for acceptance of a drive-through style business at the location. Modena "express" car washing is a retail -related convenience item, primarily done on the way to another destination or activity, e.g. to the grocery store or place of work. Express car washes tend to generate business from existing traffic rather than generate new traffic to the area. The site will be consistent with Roanoke County future land use designation "Core" by locating a proven retail business model along the arterial Electric Road Corridor. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed development will contribute to the redevelopment of the Electric Road Corridor in the vision of the recently adopted 419 Town Center Plan. The proposed improvements reflect a state of the art automated car wash facility in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Modern and environmentally friendly car wash facilities such as proposed play an important role in mixed-use communities of similar design to the 419 Town Center as many multi -family residents do not have access to traditional driveway washing. The proposed development will be in conformance with setback, yard, frontage, signage, and other specifications as specified by Roanoke County zoning code. Building design and finishings will be in conformance with modern retail development and provide an immediate improvement to the aesthetics of the corridor. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed improvements will replace a dated (circa 1978) full-service restaurant considered to be in fair condition and exhibiting numerous items of deferred maintenance. Adjoining properties accessed via the access easement to the eastern limit of the site will be unaffected by the proposed improvements and will benefit from the improvements to Fallowater Lane. The proposed car wash is fully automated and benefits from an environmentally -friendly design that uses modern technology and equipment from the world's largest manufacture of vehicle wash equipment to minimize energy consumption and water per vehicle. Over 90% of wash water is recycled and treated for re -use. As a result of these efforts, minimal impact is realized on existing public water and sewer infrastructure. As shown, the proposed entrance to the subject property is from the proposed Fallowater Lane extension and will have minimal impact on public roadways. Entrance to the proposed improvements and wash queuing lanes have been designed to allow adequate stacking and efficiency. 3 NNgHlll 'AWfW VON/DH Yyµ ;,Sg y.rvpyiy 164E-4lS �Y _. IVl S1S6-Slf B pW^ 66A 41 W NL NVnd ldMNOO YN JB p.u6 b pry :Rg Yxwa SNf5A3M1lIfl9rSN33Nl`JN3 � � E � � � I..j..l B gx nxe 'ONI '5 OZOi 'B AYM } .7 18 11Y lf3N1iNd MM kam" DIMTO MA w AMM 31v"1111 � a �r 1 z �8 gill, 01 [-- .a fA- - - � a lYA�I • Ira 7 �'¢ONNItI / a2i 'S'll OF enOV08 01=113 awsca ucow+ umm� a�sml-------------------------- a na ;. o. s oloeieis s xvo�sYo�ecor�mms�..e� „epee„ - s ; ;.n - ocmr� EXHIBIT SHOWING EXISTING WATER AND SEWER AND TOPOGRAPHY w�M _ m Zyay°' (lJ 52 q p 16 LL W ,Pgggg Uj��at�V �m�4� LU z 0 ch Npill id LO Sill ,4 g $s x� � � •g_y•p_4 Qcai :gin9 . o } a. i 41 gig o t` o iY M.� 'S•jl - I W Li ,a-sz � ,E/I L L/3 '6'PI 0'yl �gg •1 �ya3 rn —AVID 3NISNI �8 31 i� S` ,E -,L U � SJI3 ,E S.il3 E snaM 'aN06 JOsimn '34W io lno os mo mo o1 3ays LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO. 087.07-01-50.00-0000 4065 ELECTRIC ROAD BEGINNING at a point designated as point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned map, said point being on the southeasterly line of Va. Route 9419; thence leaving Route 419 and with the southerly side of a 50 -foot road right-of-way, a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet, a chord bearing of S. 88° 17' 00" E., an arc distance of 37.31 feet to point 2; thence continuing with said road, the following three courses anddistances: 5.45° 32' E.139.70 feetto point 3; thence a curve to the left having a radius of250.00fect, achord bearing of S. 56° 11'44" E., an are distance of 93.05 feet to point 4, thence S 66'51'28"E.77.50 feet to point 5: thence leaving the road right-of-way and with a line through the remaining property of Branch -Shivers, S. 27'35'3 8 " W. 181.20 fect to point 6: thence with the line of the remaining property of Branch - Shivers, the following two new division lines: N. 49° 52' 25" W. 77.50 feet to point 7, and N. 43° 48' 18" W. 307.99 feet to point 8, said point being on the southeasterly line of Route 419, thence with the southeasterly line of Route 419, the following two courses and distances: N. 41° 27' 15" E. 25.09 feet to point 9, and N. 48' 58" E. 76.80 feetto point I,the place o[BEGINNING, and containing 1.152 acres and being more particularly shown on plat showing property being conveyed to Lewis Restaurant Corp., made by BufordT. Lumsden &Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, dated November 23, 1977, or record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and SUBJECT HOWEVER, to an easement across the above described property more fully described and set forth in an easement agreement by and between M- B Properties, Inc., et al., dated. October 8,1981, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1178, page 103, to which reference is here made for a further and more particular description of said easement. SUBJECT ALSO to on easement for a sanitary sewer facility, said easement being located inside and parallel to Route 419, and being more particularly shown on the hereinabove referred to plat. TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive easement over that certain 50-footwide road right-of-way extending from Virginia State Route 419 to the above described property, said easement being for ingress and egress to and from the above described property. I;\4032D - Ultimate Shine - Roanoke Count y\S=vey\Documents14065 Electric - Deed Legal.docx Pertaining to the special use application for: Parcel: 087-07-01-50.00-0000 4065 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 County of Roanoke Community Development -- Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P,O, Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 To Whom It May Concern: Please see the following list of adjacent property owners for the purposes of notifying land owners of the proposed special -use permit. Parcel Owner, Agent, Or Occupant Mailing Address Physical Address 087.07-01-49.00-0000 JRN Chicken Stores, INC P.O. BOX 22845 4057 Electric Road Oklahoma City, OK 73132 Roanoke, VA 24018 087.07-0144.01-0000 Tenth Gate, LLC 4045 Electric Road 4045 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 087.07-01-51.00-0000 National Retail Properties, LP 450 S. Orange Avenue 4059 Electric Road Orlando, FL 32801 Roanoke, VA 24018 087.07-01-51.00-0000 D/O Land and Development, LLC 3001 Bent Ridge Lane 4079 Electric Road Salem, VA 24153 Roanoke, VA 24018 087.07-01-53.00-0000 Roanoke Property 419, LLC 2 Majestic Oaks Drive 4083 Electric Road Signal Mountain, TN 37377 Roanoke, VA 24098 077.19-01-16.00-0000 MMM Investments, LLC 120 Church Ave 4078 —4092 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24011 Roanoke, VA 24098 077.19-01-16.00-0000 Lovelace William Revocable Trust P.O. Box 2629 4060 Electric Road Addison, TX 75001 Roanoke, VA 24018 ONCElE''1 LAN WECKLYST A concept plan orthe proposed project must be submitted with the application, The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising froth the .request. In such cases involving rezoning4,1he applicant may proffer conditions to limit the ruture use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plait should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of it building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless lifnit'ing conditions fire proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed Un a special use Permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plali (15,2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request.. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the i.te►ns or suggest the addition of extra itents, but the following are considered minimum. ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale, and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square loot and dimensions — d. .Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers ofadjoittiog properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. C The ;coning find land use or all adjacent properties g. All property litres and casements h. All buildings, existing Ind proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X– i. Location, widths and names of all existing or plat.tecl streets or outer publ is ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces ddi donal iit(ol motion required for REZONMG rrrrci SPECIAL USE, PERM17' APPLIGI NTS i k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site ?L I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers in, Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals jt. Approximate street grades find site distances fit intersections o. Locations of all adjacentfire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed AA' q. Irproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule fy that all itents required in the checklist above are complete. n�.2 Date Community Development = Planning & Zoning Division x NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONAc.CEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information Prior to the scheftled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This skull allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission, The Planning Coni€xiission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTEN PIAL OF NEN'sD ICOR TwFFic ANALYSES ,AND/m TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County ITaffic Engineer or staff from the virginia Departs tent of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Nate: a list of potential laved arses and situations that wollid necessitate further stied, is provided as part of this application packagre). T1 -11S continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments anal/car suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified Of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Nampa of petition Signature Date AWOOfive dato: April 18, 2005 f kf-'c (-r t'►'a L, �I', i' �� �i, '� �� �� ii �_ I'' �� I� '��' -_ 1 �� —ca' __—___ _—,—,—I I �� � � j i�, �� �, i, ��,'�' �, �` ��,�. �'' � �, l �' i'� i'� i' i'� f i' �'� it f� i' i f� f, �� � �, �, �, ���'�� 'p� � � J pN � � Ji'� �� c r �� vs VINIOM'A1Nf100 3NONtl@1 xe va°oauo �be� sac W") 1 r� e Pa°���a° a�oradia ae�°Nooa Eo 1 Yc° Ndld 1d30N00 3ddOSaNVI e M°°a saonanans•saaa Ni�Na� �\ � oM Btez� �g uza;;ElhI I �A// OZOZai9°Atl% 1V�`�'Ti// ONI 'Saallm 3NMVd 0tl0101710313 — HStlM 7b0 3NIHS Rtlain � o � a c� z EEwAs�::] E%IS�ING BUIL°iNG odor A RNSE° MEDPN owzA/ '6 , u....o ..... a oo _ W v .o > m n L — o N Z C` n m E v'o m V j n c E > n E 2 _ o o O F vcm - U C v m v o —o _ m E o _ _ o m L n'? > roD o c - o£ cm Env 5 u _0 ¢ E 0 0 N � n � � % Q ■ 3 a o LU r _ v .O o m LO LL O� N — F N N m E o.o m e V G c_ncE lo W W W 6 o p w v J O J _ v F w _ a v " O o O c� co co O c� = o .o - c v N L L LO _ b -m E — O O — N cc mL a>>L`o I I I I I - :S m o5 `m Env3v 1 N o No s r m o p LU ^LOo_ _ o lo {:z�m^. : ,. - \ \\\\\}o 2 g - E o - o - . \\\�ww \\�\\}\}\\\\ C) O c - - - j/\/}{\\/)}(\)j( = j Q C� C r D LL O� N 7 J (� O J �• LL 7 H U . ■ m v'O o V L a o W r _ o LL O� N — F N N _ Z ca m v'O o V m> n E > a E o _ - O cc om - vo v ° o = e o �� c m o _ v o _ E — o rn - _ _ m I� N 0 5 `m E n v 3 Hoo. _ r w 2 a D m o p I �1 7k 4 .F ae. t I a I. A r- �•�� tie * � Y � x ��M1i�4. -_ �. �' - _ Y ,�i- _y4 4i(, e` Sr4 i. 1 r. , _ { + .f ��' L•�u�`{ :l p fib 4 i 4 f. I / A .krX2� 5y l } Vd: �•� y t �* -•Vii• � �'�e. ,J !} e' � f I l� -� 0 Vol • t ,'�tr� ',��a Y ,��. fir. _ �.f.. <k � .F �� � . SPI u a� -•— e ,. , 'art �,� ��,: .i f. wbpe� i� a�l 'y: 4� — � � r }��Fw 5' .. • � -r� '-t* L �ir�; ,b: 7 gin• - ?F ,% { q " /t F:. . d ik. �Y• � y n�4a 14 2 _ � ZIA _...r t 1. t. qL taw FViY w`. li t� + 94 y u T WIa— ffP�, �1 ' �.Wl_.l Yti.. 'p� a i � °, � n f �;`.iy �•yS�S .ta � X14 l„L l h5 T e r� u ! Lr } I kt 4 ! xi i �� x�A� ';a .', ., i ° i 1 `�' �+ i •�.. .° fp � Y P°; � s e °. , a � �. j �F� '� � ° yy 4 P R 1�( 5' � � � ' '� a i ���� � _ 1 "��.m'�"° t ' 3 -cam ., -. �, 1: . , j' _ - � +. � �, I. �,. i �� r. �' t '� x � �: ' �3 . �. yF a 4 ie. Yt,' �i. .. f _. r _ _ '� ... l _� `w f � - �' !{I .. 1 1. }K _ _ ._'8 1y H LM . S .S 'i fro '.0 .�' .r y i. � ... _P' � 'tea 1 +444 e. �t }_ a. �+�'_ i P `, ; A i .:- x � C-2 District Regulations SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -Family Dwelling * Two -Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * C-2 District Regulations Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary Family Day Care Home Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Antique Shops Automobile Dealership Automobile Repair Services, Minor Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail Bed and Breakfast * 2 Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General 3 C-2 District Regulations C-2 District Regulations Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Dance Hall S C-2 District Regulations Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213- 15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16) See. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). 61 C-2 District Regulations b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. C7 C-2 District Regulations (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) Use & Design Standards — Commercial Uses See. 30-85-10. Car Wash. (A) General standards: All new car wash facilities, whether conveyor operated or self service, shall be equipped with a water recycling system for eighty-five (85) percent of the water used. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. i 0 O W Q) -0 c u O T co C: (U :3 C cE E C m O Q i .� U cn O -b i 'O s � � 0 + O p c v C +� 1 O oco: O u o M M � M Q -6 O E + NN cQ Cn ° � U p� Cn v � •N �3 -� ,� � •Q 'Z3 N N ° O ct N N p O •N O � �' 'V N � C, � ti R) ;t Cd'�F, ^co r Cd , U � .N gzt V ti NN N z� A •N ,� cL .N CO cL Cd Z �y�,� � `NJ •QN, V � ^ N � VN A P-4 O O W Q) -0 c u O T co C: (U :3 C cE E C m O Q i .� U cn O -b i 'O s � � 0 + O p c v C +� 1 O oco: O u o M M � M Q -6 O E + M N N W u u N O W Y C CL C:4.1 O U (T 4-) O � � O Cd'�F, r Cd , Cd 'Cd Cd .O Cd z� Cd O P-4 O rA ?�I 4—) . +� C) 0 (:) 0 Cd C) W Cd Cd p O J � Cd O V cid N a ri N co Q E 1 O Q 4-1 O O O O Q O C � O Q� OE O [):� O -0OC4-1 Q) m C iU LE U U 0 i C O --a+' 16 4-1U c i > o O Q 3 U .. Q •C F o�� E Ln S V Q —(Z E• +' N aT O c 0 dj o `� •� O +' o +' • v> O > v OLE4-1 M N N W u u N O W Y C CL C:4.1 O U (T c '� c o N E c o c N Q O Q O i-' m N c o o m —,j)E o > � 3 > 0- 0c O o Q)o c QN N u E—CL U (0 N VI •@ N a m �_ 'm -O T D -u C O c U) @ N O 7 c N c c s 3 0 o u °� E E u N U „� @ „� ,@ O cn -o u " 3 c ± 3 c E c m m m o o> > Q m V Y 000000000000 M N N W u u N O N W Y Q) u c �L V u TMI M O S NU s O M 41S M E v E +� s � � .0 � � O o� U 2 O N U U U U N O O O U cn m o �y a 1 'f I �I� i _ - •j r e 1 _ - a N _ r0 N N N TDF- (0 Ul CC O) U O .N N a7 Uvi U= N Q N o E o o a o o CT o N a N _ c -C7N t0 N O _Ol C Q t46 N t0 X C O 4-C N N TD a-' O > Q cB t6 > O N U Ol N N r6 C U C O O N U `� N7:3 Q F CO C O Ol X t0 Old N Q� U C O U X N° i .0 -o = O>- Q F 0 .0 C CO �7 O N Q O A N N T a c o a s 0 0 0 o c c > n 02- m D�-0 W NU U) N — N — — n n n n n n n n n n n n IL =0 co sad, �o*' _0 U .w i +� = ,AA of C �p w Q of O d C M C 0 C a+ d •a N C U C. ao _ d IA - O Y U > d u 1. coUoxcs° i°' M uuCL c aac-W +_=u,du a to o, lW A (, s Lv kt-k es - Ile, I 'r rS�l+e, �-. �y a 1 'f I �I� i _ - •j r e 1 _ - a N _ r0 N N N TDF- (0 Ul CC O) U O .N N a7 Uvi U= N Q N o E o o a o o CT o N a N _ c -C7N t0 N O _Ol C Q t46 N t0 X C O 4-C N N TD a-' O > Q cB t6 > O N U Ol N N r6 C U C O O N U `� N7:3 Q F CO C O Ol X t0 Old N Q� U C O U X N° i .0 -o = O>- Q F 0 .0 C CO �7 O N Q O A N N T a c o a s 0 0 0 o c c > n 02- m D�-0 W NU U) N — N — — n n n n n n n n n n n n IL =0 co sad, �o*' _0 U .w i +� = ,AA of C �p w Q of O d C M C 0 C a+ d •a N C U C. ao _ d IA - O Y U > d u 1. coUoxcs° i°' M uuCL c aac-W +_=u,du a to o, r -a_ VON o� ��1 s � �• Y �71�1 }, U N r6 C N N + N N O F r0 CO fl- N > O1 II1 TD s Q>� =1 X� N _. r6 > O c Q- c L, �� �� E r6 -4 N O ,,-4 r6 O C �' j N F F +� �, N N �_ O O 0 CC Q (0 �7 N E +� N U C Q O N +- N �7 u O O— U O N N u o O O Q Q o N O N N >> c6 fl-'"-_, N N o 0 0> c r6 C = Q W N C (n N O Q r6 U C to .��' n n n n n n n n n 62 c J2i IA O= u M C N °'`-'' u o f L7 d m� o d u %� •_ u d— d— t C d d 10 i c.0 s G1 = w u=i 2 u ofa o� a LA a U \ � 7 � f / _ / a U \ � 7 / _ / \6 j/ \% \ .g ® c 2\jat/%/\\ \ f \/� � �\ \2\\ E�\\ \\�\_ \ +\ -FD -/c®E: ©\dc �ƒ /\ ®^� ®rL /\� /jib /© 5a53 /@o•- '3/§ eom=3\==e=.=x2 -,l) a4 c\ -a e0 of /E . y� %\ y Q) 2 o 21(1)o g yy yob o /2e /s2e/czo2eLu oc=z - » \° m t A A A A s A A c o E ° - 0 ƒ � 2 e 7 •o.ec in 2 2=e � §§■ 0 %- o/ �� . . `�ot�2©= �� ®® ac •�© §�°CL ' ' �2§° k2 U ���§ @oto 4 s c°) . - §�8-0 04)0 CL§ M's 2 w m m m E � I u E a:� a U \ � 7 u I ■ a; I e M U � cw & . § ©4 CLC �u2 ��2 �0c to -'2e S@2 02@2 Sm �m Ic2 uScn-W �2§ato »\2 ©\ L0 \\2 z\\ \ƒ°` j©© \� _\�\ ° /\2 E \-CC »- c4 a n 7\ \\\ `REL / mQ) 3c=\/% %\/% 2F© /\\/2i s/\=0 »©\» ��^^ /o% =22^� _} c-se?� %\. - %0 cc= ®e \.\\%\\« � Ln §==F Q)oz/ 772% / sc\-30 -.=2a} t%=c%Q>)- y\ eccQ) v,= s ea e} e ace=ayes co>=-= /\sect=csz.\2/22\3 /§x237% -coo \/F Lx, /&\/ Eo: // A A A A A A A A A A a; I e M U � cw & . § ©4 CLC �u2 ��2 �0c to -'2e S@2 02@2 Sm �m Ic2 uScn-W �2§ato O�p sit 16. jo U \ � � 7 7 \ U 'a u ( � � �ƒa ƒ) 7 > / ° \ - .) ) [ o / � N .® / .�- . AMM \25smU.U,Uy \U, U\ c- oo®c- \2/\/J\c3=3�c352/ .3%\ %\\2/% 2Q) Q).3%\ E 3` 3 2 ®% \ x: 2 2 >, U \/\/%4,2C)- 2J\®\ tte§©§2y»\\®s»t\� cU/ c/ cae® cs/e® ce/ Q) CL cc c>es c.- es ca =eƒ=c=ac==}9e==eƒ a=�acasee a=ossa=� A A A A A . 0 , 2 � B IM �E2� @� � 1 C M §§ouu J20 CL .E u .-x�o �� ���2 �.E§u vs 0 0 'A E•®c 00 = a�2� U \ � 7 e \ m CL Q) > TD of CL E:0 3»c >cF/accts o cao \./36z/\z 0 0 'A E•®c 00 = a�2� U \ � 7 \ E 0- 0 a � \ � \ � / u 0 � � / P/% k \ Ol 7 U \ � 7 \ � c ) \ \ \ k t � o ± / 3 \ o k � § E / � - _ •c 0 � E $ 0 � ƒ � � \ 0 2 ) � o °° 2' 2 0 c 2 � 3 0 7 \ � � � \ �PY) \ 0 0 $ � $ �7 / e / 0 0\ 0 7 � o \ 9 . 0 $ $ ° � e \ / E / w o 0 \ E 0- 0 a � \ � \ � / u 0 � � / P/% k \ Ol 7 U \ � 7 N E 0. O 0 � pj to U a' > O 41 41 41 0 ts yN (6 > O7 U aS > aN U 4-1 O v> f6 0 -0-6O m m Q (nMQ)O+ Oi > ca 't3 1 Q ooo > O O ca U O u Q Oo O ci ci y O7 f�6 •� N N N Q E U Q V' ,tn U o O4-1 O O > ts -C> > +, .� Q O > v ra O 4-1 os > o o'er o� � � U O T uC ° 0> X N S 0O N a' is >, +' O +' �i O N '�a � +� > s O � �' > W ca - 01 0> o�� �s �� prl �� yM 0 14— M �' w v -0O O O 4-1 vi s > �' O ca > O U O ca ca c�a ov > c�a U U U u'(n iii c�a c�a �" w w v Q iii y v • • • ti • N • ti �, • N 4-1— > A a z C M Zv>i > O� O Q s 4-1 ca >> p p p s ca O s p +' Q N 4 O U v> > U— s s O ca c >> 4-1 0 0 svi 4- is v v ca v p s v p ca Q > ca > > O — > N > U +� to O vi +' v� 4-1 MN U-+, to +, U � 4-1 U > > 07 �v O = Q o7 U c6 >o M c M IL 4141 > U O� I U 41 m � o T a� O +'41 O WH E O N SE d 57 Yl y¢ j� yy W a � O N U U Q f0 N — �_ x 4' m O 0 U - s ■ c°ry�ry m N I rlf,'r •i PON IL0. �► ■"' r a 2 no lip= N U +� Q) u+� 07 U O s O ,,2 (6 U a E --+ U c- E O (6 u (nU U U U S I4-1 S U O U cn cn S U 0) p i D E E U O N_ O a-•— O 0) O ca vi co m O 07 Q— U O � ca s cn �' aj >, U N p Qtn '� O IL 0 m c- O� v- ca O m e U O 1 +� c c- O O O 'v D D � N o c o c U o a>, C U N o =- Qs m U a- O QO v� m m Q� Z Q 0 u W N FAfta - a 0 a a;Li y� got Ire a LU "*!� � F � '+1i r Y �.416ipcn`�nat Y U 41 m � o T a� O +'41 O WH E O N SE d 57 Yl y¢ j� yy W a � O N U U Q f0 N — �_ x 4' m O 0 z ■■■x CL a 3 LL J ■ I r k- .O s ■ a a a. ■ 3 rlf,'r •i PON IL0. �► ■"' r a 2 no lip= N U +� Q) u+� 07 U O s O ,,2 (6 U a E --+ U c- E O (6 u (nU U U U S I4-1 S U O U cn cn S U 0) p i D E E U O N_ O a-•— O 0) O ca vi co m O 07 Q— U O � ca s cn �' aj >, U N p Qtn '� O IL 0 m c- O� v- ca O m e U O 1 +� c c- O O O 'v D D � N o c o c U o a>, C U N o =- Qs m U a- O QO v� m m Q� Z Q 0 u W N FAfta - a 0 a a;Li y� got Ire a LU "*!� � F � '+1i r Y �.416ipcn`�nat Y U 41 � T O +'41 O E O E Q,) U ca E O O N U U Q N — + s m O O Q ca 041 O N Q T O U U +'O vNi NQ O Q > 0 0 Q, 4-14-1O N O •N Q to 0 O > U o a 0 64 0 W d ts N ts O w Id ts i-� o O� � � s m w o N� 4-1 O O o Qv 1 v o IL O U o� o o(� s O O o O 1 v Q IL O U o� o o(� s O O O7 -0 O O ° vi oN�Q�o�� u c M. N�o'�U N 4- U.� s v O & Qs o � v O � O U M O O :3No`s v Nv � +' 4-1 O v a) 4-1'+, cnE Q 0 s IL O U o� � c m m w L N � N C 0 Q n w z io. 10 Y O 3 W Q LL Z 0 N W c Z Q NmN c IL i U o� +' +'0 41 v 0 >, N N41T ° p +' O M 4-1 4-1 0 14- 4-1 Lo c o o° Q o o O s ° E N 4-1 o o � c U O M +' N 41 M O � U coo O +' U (6 U +' f6 U (6 vi O O O +' E ~� ° v v _ �s oU •N O cva .O 4-1 :3 o Q o 3: E O Op O v M •v v> 0 W O 07 ca O U s U 4-1 c M U v ca O ° 1 1 O � 4-1 4-1 4-1 N N s o U 00 o ° ° Q o o � s °o ° u � s 0 o s M u o Q ca v� Q ca c M IL 41° U U o� 41 _ 5 2E 4-1 LU uk, 4-1 j U f6 Z > .- ca O a :314- ca O O X Q ca y O> >, O) s O ,N vi O O uvi ca O N> O U Uu c� :3o O a' C) Q) W Q � c '� k O +' � Q O O +' s +' Q O a= U c�a 1 o 1 Q O Q) o N o M w C ca D +� + , ca ��� U�U �� ����s� _ y v N O O N s > ti IL s Q O ti i/2 Q c�a ca O ILvUi W O .� .� .� c .LD O :3O7 +- O � N M-0 C LU C j U C O U j s O Q >, N � O 3: N = U 4 O m C) p O1S O Q} Q E +� +, QOs +mss u— �s 4-1' O O E ca O 07 VI y 4-U +, o �, 2' +, p >O _ .� p vIn C A N O v� O N +' N N N Q �A+-+ a C y� U �T y� Z4-1 14- � U -k' o vi U vi to M C '+ A O O �_ > O O y N O O c O"" M Q Qs > 'O — O > U N� O ti D 0 +� � U is O Zi O O M • OR c _M IL 41U U U 0 a O0 N ON i U 07 IL cc j N41 � s L u O Oa+ O —Q f6 ILS 0 —E Q _O M o N OO O>O coEO v 0 O E G O O Q O A N v4-1 O E c � O" 4-1 ca -0 14- 0- —_ E O a--+ O O } O +' U E p O > p v > U 4-1 Op O Q O M p °' QO w o E 0 T O N U U U U > _ N U O ++ U p c ca O c T T >, N U u U U u +' f6 U U i Q N f6 U i Q s s 14-Q'x E O +, v (— Q U m a> o .� 42 m '4o o . p v O> O) � U E *'j Q M m Q O (r) L7 2E E O Q>-0 N E O�on_-0pa0 °n3: o U 7 m '(f) 3: C O) U0 c M IL 4141 U o� a O0 N ON U 07 Q j N41 � s ca u O Oa+ O —Q > _O M OO O>O O a)L N E c � O" 0- vo ( } p p Op O Q M p 4-1 _ O I� LJ U � s u c Q o_ o c p O O O U N y O _ ~ S :: O O c u v� O -1 U O U C o ca O O � Q- O O_ OQ } E v N U Q u O ca -Q O 1 fT, }� O� p QQ wft�ca } N > C 0 '>, da ca p 0 +, s O O '� > u U N +� a' N O O N Q O (� O L O O N — N 04-1 Q N N •O s (D O > 'N O Lu N O �� `� O >� O U O a U O U p p' j O O vi U C S 0 0 O to 0 O Q s 0 `� �' O O s Q —_ f6 O O O m s-1 U O— O ca N P E vOi m Q m Q m Q O �O E m Q w U) Q Vis-, O) � 2 w V) .2 0 O T O N U U U U > _ N U O ++ U p c ca O c T T >, N U u U U u +' f6 U U i Q N f6 U i Q s s 14-Q'x E O +, v (— Q U m a> o .� 42 m '4o o . p v O> O) � U E *'j Q M m Q O (r) L7 2E E O Q>-0 N E O�on_-0pa0 °n3: o U 7 m '(f) 3: C O) U0 c M IL 4141 U o� O c 41 O O a -- m p O p Q O U O O L O O U} > O Q(D Q oss °' v >, c _ U +� O 'T O o o �> ca p3: O c c 14- ._ N O +� 41 �41 O o D-.- �� O O O OQ > O s i U 4 Q E O > o QE O O Q c O > U O � s .� N O �1 0 �u�� D o o eZ' O O +' O t0 s c 0� O c6 c6 O U O O Q vii O o s (u. o s m i 4-1 E 0 Q +, s c — E C — c C O O `n U + O `� c v� vi U u Q) O >, v> s O c NO s O U��� �O +' o c C � s Q ca U >4-1 O QQ ca °vy O Q) s�uo O Q 41 o O ML c O > o o) O '� Q N 0 s Q �O c C:O p co Q �' >, O O O in + O N O O p - Q cn `~ co s +' ' co Q Q Qs rO Ec�� ON c ca E 44 O O'- co p 0 - ra N +� O ) Q +' O C: C 0 O +' C: � O•a O —� U O O f M — W�: s O O O� O E C - O 'Q O w Q O + O v� 1�a' M�I - O _O p U (DCD O c O X + v —>' Qs O s c_0 U p O s co Q SIJ p 0 co •� O `� vi Q L c O N � f•) -M O > s o s �' O S S •- U N > o O C C U a p 4% O U _U Q � •N c o a�C � � O -VI-)E'>� O s s O ca c O c— p co w Q ++-1-+ U (n i 0j d� m (Dca i m U 2 J O c 41 O O a -- m p O p Q O U O O L O O U} > O Q(D Q oss °' v >, c _ U +� O 'T O o o �> ca p3: O c c 14- ._ N O +� 41 �41 O o D-.- �� O O O OQ > O s i U 4 Q E O > o QE O O Q c O > U O � s .� N O �1 0 �u�� D o o eZ' O O +' O t0 s c 0� O c6 c6 O U O O Q vii O o s (u. o s m U a i o 0 o 4-1 0 O i� u — E C — +1 C O O `n U + O > vOi c v� vi U u Q) ? O�O Q s 0 U��� vNi a)- p O � xo° ' QQ _0 °vy O Q) s�uo . Q O O E — c +-;(D > o O Pal.�C:-E 14- O O O O U �O p 0 0 U p + ' in O 4-1 N O `� p - Q O cn _O co s +' ' co Q Q Qs rO Ec�� 0 -- U O D p 0 0 N +� O ) +' 4- s C: C 0 O +' O � O O ca O v M x O ca s O O y >, cc: — > O 'Q O o Q O c K Q +' C o C O (DCD M c O X +'c N —>' Qs o � c_0 (n -0E- � c Os ' ti(n(n i o c �, O vi Oi O c O E Q Oi ca -M O > s o s �' Q) O — • - c � s U N > o O .O Q C: m+O O O U --amQ.C- — o a�C � � O -VI-)E'>� (D co Ln U a i o 0 o 4-1 0 O i� u — E O +1 C O O `n U + O > vOi c v� vi O off ? O�O v> s 0 vNi a)- p O � xo° ' 4-1 3: _0 °vy O Q) O . Q �m. �u� — v > Pal.�C:-E o 14- O O O O U �O p 0 O in O O O O p - •� N s14- U cn _O j s N c o O Qs rO O O } O vi 0 (6 c ) O O O � O O > v 0U x O ca OU c O N s >, cc: — O -I co i m-0 � o Ci c Q) Q +' C Q� 1 (DCD O c +'c N —>' S to tf c_0 (n -0E- O E Os ' ti(n(n (n a) s O -M QU o s O CD c O c O p LL � � O (D (D -0 >, O O c— . 0 O 4 `� U p U QQ Q -�C, 2 u) (f) (f) Z, Q Q U a i o 0 o 4-1 0 O i� u — E O +1 s O Oi v O c +�-+ M off ? ������� s > a)- p O T U s O > O a . Q �m. �u� Q v > o 14- O O O O U �O p 0 O in O O O O p - •� N s14- U cn _O j s N c o O Qs L4-1 } O vi 0 (6 c ) O 0 N N v 0U - m m> 0 •�' ME 0> u o vi c > `� C S vi c _O 0� to tf O (n -0E- U ti(n(n (n a) s O -M QU 0 (:n3 U a C: CL L O C O U c H i 0 4-1 0 O i� u — E O +1 s O Oi v O c +�-+ M E ? s eZ' O p � s � U s a' O " O O a Qom Q �m. �u� v c eZ c O O O Q 0� O C: CL L O C O U c H o +1 s O O c M M 4n U O N s o '0c 0 O in O O N p c •� N s14- U cn 0 N c L4-1 v O c 0 (6 c O 4- 0 v 0U - m m> 0 C: CL L O C O U c H f� �- E +1 E 41 Q o o N O C o > ca O O U ' O � Q O X U U o U O o� U O U U S Q - O v vi Q w c O > E O Q C O c 3: .S � o O O O c O Q O N � ca �O U s +� O •� 4-1 U .N U O�� U Z, O UO U s U � O z��a��� v s �E���Q ° �0-50wU U0U>4-1 o �- E +1 E 41 Q o u41 os— o > ca O O U ' O � Q O X U U o o� v U O O Q U O > U O O C O U s ca U U O �O O s +� O •� 4-1 U .N U ca E �Ec E O UO U O U � O z��a��� s U s �- E 41 os— o u° °- o o� U0 O 4-1+� O C N C;7- ° ° � IL N o ° �0-50wU ono 2 L E Q 0 O 0 E 07 E> O p U s a Q in — U U U aS Q) N 0 0 0 �U� Q�� o 7 N N H u W 0 w a N J Q u c IL U o� I\ - his O O � O � bl) C C � N O U) U O x .� C O E F- N _ � N � C Q .O O 5 J ; F- N O -0 -4- J M LO H u W O w a. H N J Q U A v D co Re m w I Cid m u 4 Q • O v► o J {: i• 10 _ O Y{ti � � O N cva v = M E O O U Y > � ci M zTT O h h IL IL LL r Ln r LM IDyl ��d �vLi. ~ l +, c L O Y a a+ O C # N M ° @ N w F � (1) a x = = w cn LU' I w J 0 ol ui 0 4-1 U) c M -4- 0- C) 0 C) u U) C) C) :p X -0 C) C) C) U) X C) E C) C) —J C) C) n 4-1 m C) 0 C) ` F- U LL 0 LO LO p u ui 0 w IL Lo Ai 0.4 ITI 10 Ln u W 0 w a N J Q u D LO r*l M N L O N O ul U O .p LOCD �' v E O is O O cva p N U > O� Z 1 n n n 10 Ln u W 0 w a N J Q u 41 N Ln N U) (10N CD on c u c Lni 4- c c O O u c N u W O w a. H N J Q U A9 ► c m m P E m 2 c O @ Y C Y N Vl � Q i Y u O c m = u m z H U) cn O w w11I10H 00 u W 0 w a u r w m m p m c @ o Y N N Q � L O m OC .c -0-P N xWE O w° c IL L U i V O O N O .41 O 10 N vl O N O � u U n O O) CVO -O o� + O� Nu, O N c U O CD 't O :3 .. 0 pO ca ' a0 QC'j � � 'E � � / R �o 7 4� LC) LC) LC) o ^ ƒ Q 0 o E > 0, / + 4-1 § o— / h \\ LO U-)ƒ 3 2 ± E 3 3 3 ? 4 3 � 2 § 2 c \ + / ƒ \ _ » 2 E S 2: \ \ \ \ I F U \ � 7 f6 0 t •� O 4-1 C: 4-1 Q LE u 0 .0� O cs y o� c o a x I cLo M 3�+� U��c —h�0 y0--aSs0oo� , N U U �� c U c N O c c c 2 u Eu O Q *� C � R Q� O O c o O 4-1 Q s 0 c t6 'X D Q� N 1 m s E o s —Q � E o E M s Q Q 4-1 0-D 4,� o o oU � � � Q o L vs X 2 o'L c c 2) s .c E w U-0 m �� o o oos o='C� C: m CL 4.1C: ^ W U c o` c — O c vOi s c O E +, � s � co u d Q� a- ° — L OO C: 41 o+.,T a=i > ++ Q) O O 14- U O L O o 0 U {� s d Q E V) o m a1 C: E lc E >, a1 s Q. 4-1o °'s 1 ~ o d o o a > = O O O vi +' -0 ca O p i = c: Q) O O s O y • • +' c v> *4--, U I Q Q c O i i C d • U x `� — (6 m Q 7 d • • +-+ a O N 4 >, s X Q� N j +� O >> T�S1 Tt � O O E c c s 0 Q� ca u L L O m E Til nl O 'Ln E c c >( O c O '� c >, O O +' o `o O L o p o v) w c +� O O co N v> O O O 0 c) v> O E O C O L O O a O� O X� — s Lo n� u E � o O }s o 0a Ol c c L l'1 c m ca O 0 ^`}1 '} O W c L O W (n O (D ° �a O v (n Qi � N o Q U Q° 4-1 .0 :3�--� �(n-0 >, L o > o E C: m CL 4.1C: ^ W U c o` 0 O O C) W +, - C m - m p Ec O O O c O s Y C= O O M Q U C Q C C C � U vi O> CO O O Q v> C E O O- +p� v O O 0 E 0-OQ o o N O�QO O+O> � o o�o 4-1 Q O +' $ a--1 C N i C U (6 Q U Q Q O ++ Q 4-1 -C CN&'m� - ) S O 4-1 Ln O� O NC O p .O0 C O UCC +U 44 U Q O C N O U L— O +, +� -0C O QoE o v o�� ° o o� o, Q 41 a) Q Q a Q) O s O p v> U s C s s O p s O ° Q +Y s(a) ° N o o o v E C p N .� Q 4-1 ) O p U in +' � O U °' o> C U ° Q E o �' ° C N~ v 0 0 :3 m > O s cn 14- ol > O cO�O s U � U O o O O r4 O� E O .O C U O O C C M O 0 0 i s 0 N C O C r6 C+ u +� E O 0 N o O� N 0> Q p `p O� > Q ca X o O O C> N Q� Q N 0> Q> O CQ E C ° O sE :3— s O O O N s °' O N C (nO C C +� O�_ O C Q) M.0 Q C O C S Q Q 14- QQ -0 O CQo oC �0Q 4-1 co �O ++ E —�� UoO -0 -0 O .c�o U omC ( _Q. O2i- -0Q O > -:3 :3 s,a� U O O s O O C 0 > C vNi O '� O Z C:p 0 C V o O :3 Ey-0 O O > c6 Q v> aU •� U C o 0 ,�; O O s >, N U �' Q Q._ O O o -0 O +� C •N O �- +, C� O C p., > Q � ��= Cis a� M ( (n 1 N ° C'° 4-1 C 0 o c Q))(n v Q .� o c •� Q c � M° O .2 E O +j '- > +' ° � '� � i O o O s O s p 0 0 O� O Y +, Q O m I- > +� Q 0 U Q A O7 O m O O U O 0 O v> ca 10 Z 0 a Z W W J IL 2 C C:4-1 U C 0` W Z O Z W W W H N Z a W LL a N a LL O Z W a 0 W W W L7 O Z W C: vi O +-' c C O vi i U vi O O O +' O E L O vi 4-1 O c E N c v �' 07 c >p Q ca Q N` v, _O +' ' N p +' u N O ca O y M >, :3 c + O +_ E = a d Q °oca Q° +' ai ms >ao a QV O 1 :3 4- O O m O O ro ca N _O Q +' Q O N N �' Q +' O O c O D U +� s U v v> +� Oc •O c Q C c ra O co c c O O O ( +' O O .+' N p LU Q s w to V) C 0 U Q t6 .E C U° :3 W �C • • • J = • U • Q) O O = O +' O c Q U O +' i U) 0 V)U s (n� d Q c O O O •O O Q O N U Ovi U ° � v> S U c6 Q •+,y '� m O Q O O .- v (CCa UO Q O O U° v o i O UE c O c c v� i •`-' M s 4-1 � O 0 14- p T O O O Q� Q s s :3U+ N O U Q C c s U O +' co Q s U U ca cas U O Q• O O 4-u� c '� O c (D W:(D M K N O 3 U •y Q c ._ ca O Q • O O s c ca N C Qs UO QOv O m -0 O +' °>O UUU (D v 0 c Q U 4-1 0 ° co Q X f6 F- p Q0 -0 OO>O v+O-+ O cc: 4-, Om Occ U) ccOOODOpoQO pO �w v =a N w OQ> � tOo • • W • • • • W • • • -0 O c a 14- E N ca cC c +, O N c vi •L ca 4-1 c +' X c U} U c C +� N (n 3: -C -C . - N •+--, O U C:Q --,z O0 p) N N (na Q (6 S y c ° O c6 S ++ m O O U C c N ca Q c M +, C O (D %£ s ca +L+ + 3 Q) Es ,y mom°' ° m° v c� c o 4-1 c m QT - = N>;%0:3 M UgQc +0,-os0 0 s��o U 4-1 u Eo:3U +, Q� � + 0. _ Q N• • o N • W N • • D • • LO 10 Z 0 a Z W W J IL 2 C: M 0 C:4-1 O U C: o` W a N W H D 1 O 2 H W Z 0 Z a J O 2 W N W V 9 >, t� E O 6 .L O M O� O E X O O O p m> > > s o o O O4-1 ca C Y 4 0 0 0 0 E Q O O 0 O C O i d > > > O E O O O c C lz = w -, w W • • s ° Q += O T o .� Q L O +1 c Up s ra U 4-1O m Q > vpiO >, vi i >, O + i Z v +' O v` )i . E O 2 .2 U O O H 0 0 0 v C U O ,O (6 E S O C O C C Q O O E +' S '� y N O O �_ C U OU ~ +'' R14- ° U p c� U i C O M C O L = ca vi 0 '+� Q O ++ O �� +' 3 ° m -0° U o ° N U 2 > V2- 1(In W • • • V � _ C t6 U �i O v� v> U i U co +� O O ZO - O +� U C;7- U O O C O C N p ° u N 14- O O U in ca O CY) p s p. Q) O O O co U O J +� O 4-1 +� O .0 O U O N > O U E O C s a-- p — M Q C O •� LL p O4-1 O p 4-1 J q- w w U Q • V N C N E U X TO E ca s O 4-1 4-1 U E O U O Q N C O4-1 O p 4-1 wwZ,E Q4-1 `n O O m N O U O U O ,+s_' C C p U M C E t7 O vi C: N U to O N V O O O s p 0 � QU Q T vi O LN O O E C C o O 2 O ++ Q —> O � C E C ,O Q U _O +L+ 0.v O C vi N d N N > p 0 > i to O U '+ d d L O(f)O oC C N i d QD i' O C t0 IM T O O O i u N C s _+- � QU C 0 W :a 4-0 • • O i p-0 O vi -0 U C T p vi C W C vi ca u -0'+� i C O +�O O C C c6 i O O 4-1 . - N� J O O� O C ,O O sO4-1 U O O +' Q O ca ca O co C '' N +' Q 147 C 4-1 d Q— co -ull~ U N .0 O U .E U . M LL � `} .0 Q O O O U o Q)-0 `° N° d �' Q c m Q �� Q o s cCD E Ua O Co O Q O ' C C\j vOi +,} O O O O p U p v)2-, _ s p4-1 p co ani C U> tC O O O O s O O 0 0 C V>+ W v, to ca C U ca O O D U Q ca U Z 0 a Z W W J CL 2 o` N tA W O w CL O a Z W W J CL9 W 2 Z L Z CD G 2 0 W H W a Z W W Z Z 0 i p' N N Q _4-1 C O d C Q Q p = N v> O i v O 4-1 4-1 °>' 4-14-1 v s +� y +2 Q •� C O O co co +s+ Q = O Q Q o N H Q) O IL Q� c d O O 3 Q N O, O Q U Q C O 4-1 •° C O Q Q Q Q O Q Q N > N Q •� L •C: Q Q cn vOi O d >� 00- = Q O O i C i ° c(a v Q N c C 4-1C cam. 0 Q � Fp c 3 O +�CL O -Q vi c O +' ca �O Q Q U sva ON +Cc O Q - C C i+' C +' QO Q NO. �vC ,a Q)++ E Q C 14- C N -0 U O U M Q O viO y�OOQUQ NO CO _Q� d �C Q C. C � +O+ ca O V ca Q C Q `~ c v O O O O O _� Q O O +' O OQ �_ t7 +' Q `� +� Q >,� Q 4-1 E ++ p Q i Q ca +� C E O O Q) R Q Q H d�� o� Q) u v v �w �U C dw o �.c�.�U W • • _ • • W • • W • • �O i i C O N Q Q >, 0 N Q 4-1 Q C + :3 d v O i Q N O N Q C y U 4-1 co N O ra �� L C N i O C C c +, m d+ f6 C to NO c O co C. N E Oi O V= Q Q s C: uQ_c O2 O c O C i Q Q Q C O M N +' C Q Q C C O O u 'X ,N -0 V y vi (6 Q 41V o Q) 41 0CL N- i O Q4-1 Q 0 O C Q p> Q 0 Q DL - 3 +_� Q O O C ,� c O O 1 c C +, Q +, N Q c p +� O 1 C i -c 0C O C cy"Q �> Q (n - K� 0U Qv vpi v IY aQi a °'U-0 m 10 z 0 a z W W J CL 2 C: m CL Q C:4-1 Q U C: o` o� IM >, > c = 3 Im �o u co d N > 0.9 o r o�Wo �C V C 0 V O O Planning Commission RE input special use permit at 4065 electric road on July 7th meeting From david a cummings 3001 bent ridge lane salem,va thank you, concerns: not unusual for back up on electric road from existing Shell Station Car wash,this high intensity use would further cause traffic concerns at the intersection electric road and Fallowater lane ext,recommend de-accelaration lane for right turns onto Fallowater lane ext from electric road now with new high intensity usage and planned further development ask VDOT for stoplight at interchange difficult to take a left turn on fallowater lane extension onto 419,recommend a left turn lane for traffic wishing to return to roanoke county assurance that current right -of-way from Sleep Inn and adjacent properties to Fallowater lane extenstension is maintained and kept in good repair and no standing cars to block access current right-of-way has steep bump onto Fallowater lane ext that causes semi -trucks from Sleep Inn to be beached on the drive,recommend changing the grade consider landscaping along Fallowater lane extn for aesthetic reason,decrease carbon foot print,decrease storm water run off currently strong water run off from Chucky Cheese to rear of current building spilling onto adjacent spillways thank you for listening david cummings AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2020 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN A C -2S (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT, WITH AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT, TO OPERATE A CAR WASH FACILITY ON APPROXIMATELY 1.152 ACRES, LOCATED AT 4065 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 087.07-01-50.00-0000), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Wild Partners, Inc., has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a car wash facility at 4065 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 087.07-01-50.00-0000), in a C -2S (high intensity commercial) district, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance 052799-8 granting a special use permit with two conditions to Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation to construct a fast food restaurant and drive-thru to be located on the parcel subject to this petition; and WHEREAS, the 1999 special use permit is null and void due to Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation's failure to commence the use contemplated by the 1999 special use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 7, 2020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition with conditions, as set forth in the staff report; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 23, 2020; and a second reading and public hearing on this matter on July 28, 2020. Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed special use meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan's designation of this property as Core (where high intensity urban development is encouraged), and with official County policies adopted in relation thereto, including the stated purposes of the zoning ordinance; and that the proposed special use will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The special use permit is hereby APPROVED with the following conditions: a. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash — Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. — Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering -Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. b. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the "Ultimate Shine Car Wash — Electric Road; Wild Partners, Inc. — Landscape Concept Plan" prepared by Mattern & Craig Engineering - Surveyors dated May 8, 2020, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. c. The existing freestanding sign shall be removed. New freestanding signage shall be limited to one (1) monument style sign not to exceed five (5) feet in height and seven (7) feet in width with materials to match the building fagade. The freestanding sign shall not contain any LED, digital faces, or electronic message boards. Page 2 of 3 d. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. e. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building fagade. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. Page 3 of 3