The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/25/2004 - Regular Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda May 25, 2004 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for May 25, 2004. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturdays at 4:00 p.m. The meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Reverend Tom Cribb Bethel Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS C. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits o~ the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. F. 1. First reading of an ordinance to amend the zoning on Virginia's Explore Park from EP, Explore Park with conditions, to EP, Explore Park with amended conditions, in order to remove a natural area designation, located at 3900 Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. 2. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.24 acres from R1 Low Density Residential District to 12 Industrial District in order to operate a construction yard located at 7314 Wood Haven Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ernest E. Sweetenberg. 3. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to conduct equipment sales and rental on 7.7 acres located near 3902 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of James River Equipment Virginia, LLC. 4. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.35 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District in order to construct a financial institution office located at 4975 Bower Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Member One Federal Credit Union. 5. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.3 acres from AG3 Agricultural Preserve District to PRD Planned Residential District and rezone 97 acres from AR Agricultural Residential District to PRD Planned Residential District, located south of Whistler Drive and Creek Circle and east of Apple Grove Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Sam L. and Mercedes P. Hardy. 6. Kahn Development (Keagy Village) rezoning request will be brought forward as one of the two following options: (a) First reading of an ordinance to rezone 9.85 acres from C1 Office District to C2C General Commercial District with conditions, and rezone 5.1 acres from C1 C Office District with conditions to C2C General Commercial District with conditions, and rezone 1.1 acres from R2 Medium Density Residential District to C2C General Commercial District with conditions in order to construct a general office and retail sales facility located at Route 419 near its intersection with Keagy Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the amended petition of Kahn Development Company. (b) First reading of an ordinance to rezone 9.9 acres from C1 Office District to C2 General Commercial District and 5.8 acres from R1 Low Density Residential District to C2 General Commercial District in order to construct a general office and retail sales facility located at Route 419 near its intersection with Keagy Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kahn Development Company. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2004- 2005 budget. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) 2 H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES APPOINTMENTS I. 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (Appointed by District) 2. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) 3. Court Community Corrections Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) Policy Board 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District) 5. Roanoke County Cable Television Committee 6. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission 7. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community Advisory Committee (CAC) 8. Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau 9. Roanoke Valley Detention Commission 10. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOw. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes - May 11, 2004 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) Board of Directors 3. Request to approve the naming of the Court Services Building (formerly Salem Office Supply Building) 4. Request to approve the naming of the Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center 5. Request from schools to accept and appropriate dual enrollment net revenues in the amount of $2,238.19 3 6. Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $1,000 from the Oracle International Database Competition 7. Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $2,500 from the United Way's Success by 6 Enhancement Grant for the purchase of playground mats 8. Request to approve 1999 Utility Billing bad debt write off 9. Request to appropriate $410,000 to various public assistance programs in the Department of Social Services 10. Request from the Sheriff's Office to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $5,140 for the purchase of bulletproof vests K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule a joint work session with the Planning Commission on June 8, 2004, to discuss revisions to the Community Plan. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 2. Request to schedule a work session on June 22, 2004, to discuss Kahn Development (Keagy Village). (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future Capital Projects 5. Accounts Paid - April 2004 6. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month ended April 30, 2004 7. Statement of Treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of April 30, 2004 4 S. 8. Report from VDOT of changes to the secondary road system in April 2004 O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (3) discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for public purposes. P. WORK SESSIONS (4th Floor Conference Room) - 4:00 p.m. 1. Work session to discuss financing for the public safety building. (Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) 2. Work session to review proffers for the Slate Hill Project, 4486 Summit Street, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) EVENING SESSION Q. R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of congratulations to students at Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkilisUSA Vocational Industrial Clubs of America, Inc. (VICA) awards 2. Resolution of congratulations to the William Byrd High School Girls Swim Team for winning the Group AA State Championship in the 400-meter freestyle relay 3. Certificate of recognition to Kelly Clark, Glenvar High School, for winning the Group A State Championship in cross country 4. Certificates of recognition to the following All-State Band and Chorus Winners: (a) Joe Pirro, Hidden Valley High School (b) Sarah Armstrong, Glenvar High School (c) Prachi Sharma, Glenvar High School (d) Amy Minnix, William Byrd High School PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 4.83 acres from 11 C Industrial District with conditions to R1 Low Density Residential District for a development of single family housing located at Tract B1-A-2 of Mason Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Balzer & 5 '. . .. T. U. V. Associates, Inc. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) PostDoned until June 22. 2004 at the request of the Detitioner 2. Second reading of an ordinance granting tax exemption of property owned by the Salvation Army pursuant to Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone .800 acres from R1 SUP Low Density Residential District with Special Use Permit to C1 Office District in order to construct a public safety building, parking and access road located at 5929 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 4. Second reading of an ordinance to change the zoning classification of a total of 29.98 acres located at 4486 Summit Street from the zoning classifications of C-2 conditional, R-3, and C-1 to the zoning classification of C-2 with conditions, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Slate Hill " LLC, Slate Hill II, LLC, and Woodcliff Investments, LLC. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) PostDoned from ADril 27. 2004 at the request of the Board of SuDervisors CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ADJOURNMENT 6 , ' ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F 1-(" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances- consent agenda SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ "17'" . .-(" BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for June 22. 2004. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. The petition of Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority to amend the zoning on Virginia's Explore Park from EP, Explore Park with conditions to EP, Explore Park with amended conditions in order to remove a natural area designation, located at 3900 Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District. 2. The petition of Ernest E. Sweetenberg to rezone 1.24 acres from R1 Low Density Residential District to 12 Industrial District in order to operate a construction yard located at 7314 Wood Haven Road, Catawba Magisterial District. 3. The petition of James River Equipment Virginia, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit to conduct equipment sales and rental on 7.7 acres, located near 3902 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. Çl-~ 4. The petition of Member One Federal Credit Union, to rezone 1.35 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District in order to construct a financial institution office located at 4975 Bower Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 5. The petition of Sam L. and Mercedes P. Hardy to rezone 1.3 acres from AG3 Agricultural Preserve District to PRD Planned Residential District and rezone 97 acres from AR Agricultural Residential District to PRD Planned Residential District, located south of Whistler Drive and Creek Circle and east of Apple Grove Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 6. Kahn Development (Keagy Village) rezoning request will be brought forward as one of the two following options: a. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 9.85 acres from C1 Office District to C2C General Commercial District with conditions, and rezone 5.1 acres from C1 C Office District with conditions to C2C General Commercial District with conditions, and rezone 1.1 acres from R2 Medium Density Residential District to C2C General Commercial District with conditions in order to construct a general office and retail sales facility located at Route 419 near its intersection with Keagy Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the amended petition of Kahn Development Company. b. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 9.9 acres from C1 Office District to C2 General Commercial District and 5.8 acres from R1 Low Density Residential District to C2 General Commercial District in order to construct a general office and retail sales facility located at Route 419 near its intersection with Keagy Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kahn Development Company. Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for June 22. 2004. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1-6, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 2 Ç-I . County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning Case Number 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 'i~~~~j CJ¡eck type of application med (check all that apply) !SfRezomng a Special Use 0 Variance ~l¡Plicants nam~address wlzip -.' ' . . \!1Rc.iN(P, k'~e.....-1tò,J/..(+-I'c I. +tt."'!" ~-th.~ j 3"100 (j;>",+ec,oc..h 2.c. 1 S~ 0 \i,.. I a Waiver a Administrative Appea1 Phone: 4?"t- /<rx:,o Work: 1\ Cell #: " Fax No.: "" Owner's name/address wlzip Phone #: \ <7AI-I.<-- ~NI€.""-'r'I bx~~t"v¿..1>..-c-Ó'a<:.. Work: \ Fax No. #: \ '\. Existing Zomng: Size ofparcel(s): Acres: --1.J.QQA::R.~ Existing Land Use: ~~öi~;~~~ciw- f!~P M,tW)!~w.~~.~~i~~~~@- u . . -., ProposedZomng: <¿'f..?loe<:..- ¡::,-zo,..,ì).J4 v.J/ AH..~ LÐvP"'¡""¿'P Proposed Land Use: P \2.6 ~ the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST, Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST 1f rezomng request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes "-.""'" --"'--"'--- No 5fiimq~i1im)t ,wp:;i)J~I~ii~~~~iii¡¡i¥iiÆijl." .- ,- _..,c-- ,:~."-.,,."-,,-,_..,,-,,",..,-- VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zomng Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zomng Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zomng Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE \liIISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RlSfW V/AA RlSIW V/AA RlSIW V/AA êå Consultation Eíi g 1/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification WaW! and sewer application AdjoiIUng property owners I bereby certify that I am either the owner of the ~roperty or the owner's agent or contract purc.baser and ~-~g will> the knowledge and' consentoftheowncr. r:!)þ":ðl¡ -IldlY? ¡.{J;Y&t?m Exec ~;"e ,(J6~é?rSi~ture /0 ¡L V r<. F If, - 2 ~I Memo From: Roanoke County Planning Commission '\ r, V .Jt/j Deborah H. Pitts, Interim Executive Director Virginia's Explore Park iJ y.C'A .t Marc Taubman, Chairman Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Tom R. Brock, President River Foundation To: cc: Date: April 23, 2004 Re: Reauest to Amend the Exnlnn> P""' ZQQ!æJQ Remove the Natural Areas Designation In 1991, the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) passed a resolution designating certain areas of the park as Natural Areas. The designated Natural Areas were included with documents submitted for the zoning amendment adopted in 1993. Specifically, the VRFA is requesting that Attachment III, Resolution to Designate Natural Areas within Virginia's Explore Park, be removed from the EP zoning amendment adopted in 1993. In March 2004, the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority passed a resolution to repeal the Natural Areas Resolution, and request that Roanoke County amend the Explore Park zoning district to reflect the change. A copy of the March 2004 Resolution is attached. Purpose of the requested amendment is to allow the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority to move forward with some planned activities within some areas of the park previously designated as Natural Areas and to evaluate other options for park development. f-I RESOLUTION OF THE VRF A BoARD OF DIRECTORS TO REPEAL THE NATURAL AREAS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (the "VRF A"), ar its meeting on October 8, 1991, adopted a Natural Areas Resolution (the "Resolution"), setting aside and conserving 62 percent of the Park's existing real estate; and WHEREAS, the Resolution was never filed with the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, making repeal of the resolution a matttlieft to the sole discretion of the VRF A Board; and WHEREAS, a current assessment of the Natural A1:eas Resolution and the existing real estate with updated technologies not available in 1991 found that some of the properties designated natural areas are not owned the VRFA or have been sold by the VRFA; and WHEREAS, some planned activities are not allowed in areas designated as "natural"; and WHEREAS, on Explore Park's 10th year of operation, the VRF A Board of Directors wishes to review without encumbrance its current asset and development base and re-evaluate other revenue-producing options, such as those discussed at annual retreats and strategic planning sessions, among others, to plan for future growth. N OW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the VRF A Board of Directors wishes to repeal the Natural A1:eas Resolution adopted by this same Board on October 8, 1991; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the VRF A requests that Roanoke County amend its Explore Park District zoning ordinance to reflect this change. This resolution is adopted this 30th day of March 2004. Jl~ubi. c:id--- Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority . . r::-- I Attachment IIT ", ~~~~.p: \9£1¡!':'y~~ ~:¡j!1j .'.' ì~ .:,: ~,Â "~.I, II' '., \\:. VIRGINIA RECREATION/\!. FACILITIES AUTllQf\lTY [lr.f',OLU'rIOI:~ '1'0 DI~SlGI~l\'I'I~ NNI'UIìI\L "","II::; Wl'nlld VIL\CIL~l^OS ¡,::<L'LOIŒ I'AI<I' ~'ht' no,-,rd of Director:.: of the Vir'Jini.õl lh.!cr"'i.ltion,\1 P'leil-Ltl"" Autht,¡:ity (VluoA) i,t i> l[LI..rt"rly ILI,~('ti\l(j 1IL'1<1 on OctobL'r fl, 1'='91, ILldkø:.: the foLl(win~1 ¡{(,cita.L:,: 1. I-n1ec"""." ilt it"., I\pril 11, 19')1 Iilccting, the VIU'A iI'Jcct'd that action ".,hould be t,Ù..",n to û,-",i'jll'<I:" :.:i<]lIitic,'I"II, pi,rcel:.; (,L the.! Explorc' ¡-<;Irk f,it.: not to be LI,-,vùlopcd, La rcillÓdn "1~..tUl:i, t ACc,;-","; õlnd ? ~¡hcr(.'a"., "Naturil1 I\r(.'õ\:::;" ¡H'~ dofinrod ",¡ fire"" wh...c," destructive' 11LIIII;ln ilIlP"Ct i"., to be }:ept to "m.i.nillluill. D"Vo,loplf1,~nt if; pcoì-.ihltcd except [or foot õu1d horse lcail", hi1(ing :,ìl,-,1<.,.,,':, . tiret aid ".,ti1tlo~~, and minor Guppo,t cenrurs for the ator'~III('ntioned. Non-con;;ulllptivc :\ctlviti"f¡ :,lIL.'h a:. ),il<ln'j, birth;;,tchi,vj, ('colo'Jical ;:;tLHJy, and weldllCe or):;.~r.vatÜ), "t:(' "ncoLlle"'F'd. '!'lti~ prc",cl:iptloll on dcvelO!,\IIL'nt doe" 'KIt ¡¡PI,Ly to v",ì,icu1",r ace..";,, rout"" id"IÜ.ifi.".1 i\l bL"d: dot!; on L1,," III"P nere to LL1C r\.Lue Hld'JC p..,,:kway L"i'Jht Dr I¡:,Y '",," tlJ the N01:Loll' i::outhern r i'Jht or ',;õ.oy; 'Illd 3. Wherc"", "ix ¡¡atur"l J\ro)"e have b,~(,n i,1e1'1tll:icd ,elf:. suited to t:lll!; l'Llrpo:Jc in E"p1o,:'-' 1';,,£1<. '!'h,-,ir tlound;Lrlt'" ;,1'" defirl"<'\ on tIlL! ,:,ccùlllpanyin<j \II"p. 'l'I,,'y have, Iw"11 uiven LÚ" lùllowinl.l n;IIII'-'" and nl1\11ìK"'" j/l. it? It3. H. íI~ . ~G. Dou1'1dary Duffce Arua (JOO' ducv IÜv"r Gorgc ~-Illdl i.U, co['ri(1or. DõI~k Crook Wild Area. Hi<Jhland~ Ridge Wild ArCh. ¡.oin" Mount"in H"tur"l AI:e"'. Hilrdy R,}.!lt 11<\tLlr;\l Arc,;,. around CdaD of park). NOH 'rllr~lmFOlU: DR I'f R~~SOLVED, that tho Board at 1)ic,'('l:o,:,; oC tho Virginia 1(",cr..,atioll"l 1""cllitio;; huthorily de,!li'jn.-.U)f; th,-, :;i:< Natun,l J\r"ilS ;'S pr<,viou,;ly d,"l'ined [lnU ,;howlI on lhe: ;,CCOill(_>t.,nyinr¡ map ;)1'1d pcohibits futuro d..,v..1'~p"'L'nt ther<Ün. "xe""pt [L!¡ notc.o' above, wit'" usa of Lhe ar",a,¡ 1iillitüd to non-COr"Õl1I1\ptiv.:: recr(.'ationa1 and educational bctivlti..,!;; and Dr. 11' fUIl'I'llim .IUèSOLVED that tll... VIU'A rl.!que,;t,; Lìw ,;t;d:1' o!: Tne niver 1-'oLinojilt ion to p,\r';L\ü LL\{lh,~r ,.tuo.ly ù[ t.llC'. d,,"-".\1'1;'I.("¡ ...-"--..--- 101 Suulil ('1'Il'I:;L)11 ~;Lll',~l-~:;ixlh I'kl(lrlk1;¡l1ukl', Vilgilli;I:~'loll(;,œ,)?,'lc~'I~:'):; ,° p: Natural ~reas and otner Explore property, including but not limited to a biological inventory by faculty and students of Virginia ¡>olytecnnic II\stitutc. tne aGsessment of ecologic,"tlly sensitive areas, and recommendations concerning boundaries of additional sucn areas; and BE IT PURTHER IU".SOLVRD t11at tne VR¡"A requests the staff of The River Foundation to contact the Virginia Outdoors Foundation and other otnte agencies regarding possible future designations of the parcels as official Natural Areas, registered with tne commonwealth of Virginia, or equivalent status via dedication of conservation or open space easement. Tnis resolution is adopted this 8th day of October, 1991. ~.., ~~~L"'.-~ ---9-~\C=- L.1. Hamlar. Cha~rman Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (-1 W+E S County of Roanoke Explore Park Properties F-I May 3. 2004 Scale: 1" = 2000' . County of Roanoke Community Developmènt Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only Date receive~z.?/ZbbJf Received b~ ~ i? Applicaóon rcc: !£fBZA datel:JJzw+ BOS datetln/zw.f 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 :i~jw:~~f~W$ Placards issued: Case Number ... .. ", , Check type of application filed (check all that apply) R'í Rezonmg 0 Special Use 0 Variance Applicants name/addr~ :",iz.iJ?__- ZR.NE';;r £" ,?~Cf ï;3J4 wbl>þJMVt:N RJWJ fZÞÙ'¡C>IQ{ V',l z.4D/1 Owner's name/address whip ê.R.¡Jr~T E. $VJŒTli'Ni3rRt;¡ 7"?J4 lï./bbþ//AVe/ R,4ó/} IibJ,IJox;:E:. VA 7-/fl)/1 Property Location O.ò3 MiL£' ?,,<iT}/ 61= ~ ¡/.JYØ<5~CiI/ M Magisterial Disnict: c..AtÁ,W/3Ã l/A.J.œYPoi~ P~-tWAY jý- vJbèpJì4VItN ~ CommUllity Planning area: HbLLJ/II5 Tax Map No.: 2.Io,1'1-/-Ç'(¡, Existing Zoning: R,-I Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.2.'1 Existing Land Use: r -/!'~AfìfifP þ,~r~c::¡()'<:> i.t{j~~.~k~Çl& U$~ Mtr#ft~\W~¥1.!glli.iq#fÞA:éf!:!§tVfj , ",' .' . Proposed Zoning: -'- - z.. I¡.JPl.{jTR.,I1'tL I Proposed Land Use: TRqcx ~ ~¡J¡PI1£!.1r ~ /..IE'AI('( ~UJPt>1ENT P~jJ6r 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Phone: ~z. - ,:>?3<15' Work: 7'&:.3 - BL5'7 Cell #: :>.Dq - ""'~ Fax No.: <;6--3- 82. 57 Phone #: AßoVE" Work: 4:ßt>.¡i; Fax No. #: A/5DVE Does the parcel meet the min.imum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the min.imum criteria for the requested Use Type? IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes Yes No No :jfii¥:~~iA1Y~~,Wp#J~iÆ~iiik~~~~i.~iiiii~\¥j~mj~J."".,.'~ '..'....."" .,.,.,c VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zonmg Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zonmg Ordinance ç:.~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEP1ED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLE1E. RlSfW V/AA Rlsrw V/AA RJsrw V/AA § Consultation Eji 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers. if applicable Justification Water and sewer application AdjoinÏng property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or conlract purchaser and am actb1g with the knowledge and' consent of the owner. Owner's SignatUre 2 ", "' ",' " 1~$WîFIçATtON FOR REZONING. SP)J:êlA'Þ )J~'jjJj)~êj~W~',R;ro¡:qpjÊ)$'!! ""'d" """"",.."" ',""""'" F--;}. Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezonmg, special nse permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in tenTIS of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zonmg district classification in the Zonmg Ordinance. ïT-fJ<A"f" 1:7 "'I> PRbft:6,"Ø QMJ.l~ IN -n¡¡;- L¡f,I( DF T1f£ PR.l>PER/Y. r iI4~ /M.þ 7'R).,c¡-'*.? AN!) TR.l/d\~ Z>,\ 'ì1H~ L.ANp :SINer 11/",8. ~tf1z/{.,--m:5 ACJ\ò;>5 V/JJ.l.Ãýf'DINIc. ÞR./~ ,{Nj) WlX>.DMVÐV 1~D4;þ A.R;E z.d-/E'i) INpLfj/R./AL r ),PAN.;; c.oN?TR.LICT7t>N ct::¡'ffPA/Jif TR,U4í.$ RuN ALL þAY AN!) IJItfl-fr (Zt.¡X7) bN Wtbj?HÂ.VÉ'N ..I,.fJj) ýA)..U;:YPDlNrE. 'T¡./.£I{ R~^I AI NI6,1fT IN 71ff" 5íJMA1rR. ~ ND/f>E:: uvtL I¿ TDD HIt;H 'F1>R., /~-( ZL>NINr:r. " Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. íi+f, fR/V"£"-T 15 l..Þc;;n;p "'4 AN INOLt?TRIAL A¡{E"A-c APAM.5' TIÇ/ICKS pA!:¿ 71/1= À~E"A zL.(. y; 7. Ttl-J, FfT5 RI¿;HT 1"1 wl71l c.l5M,P4A/Jt=> IA/ ""TT-I€" ÁR. FA . Please describe the iInpact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities. including waterlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Tfl1iJ~F \A../I1.L I3r "'I> IM.PA.<,T l>!I/ PLlf3LJc.. 'j,~VlLrr5. f"E:R.. V4!<./Â1-JèE ~RA>fiEÐ APRIL 2/) ZDb,!, r 1J.//4. MA1A!Tlt1~ A. 2.5"" -Fb.bT ~èK~ T#t CPN>ïR,Llq-¡DN YJ.RP Mj) MY Áj2J4Ó:ìlT/~/Pom.4¿. L.1Sð ANy pi.AJJr EYER.6,i?li?J.J TR,Er},4Jj) 5~i31> < ~o T1fl; -¿/J:5nN~ Åt:Œ..~:;. þR/~ ~HAl.L /{ÐII<AIN IJJ 4J;ÞrT7t/ý 'TD TIJID H¡FTAL ~1(Ti7 U~ W/flCH ÁJr'( PA~AJ4 DR. ~¡:: ðts:..I.IRRI},/ij ;9IALL ~ c..bA/J>ucl£/l f>D A-~ /D NOr }.t:.C.u/YI,I.//,...qè" þF!Si:.I5 bR... C4UfE" A NtJljJ,Ak.r.. 3 IF~ 1¡#f$~dAfiÖN FOR VARlANCÊ ~~~~. Applicant Th~ining Appeals is re~uired by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a varíànce can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance sball not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property. 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. .4 ¡:::~ I 1~¥?~1iŒ}ê^,fION FOIl rillM)NI$~t#:~~~~~~,~~#.' Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: 2. Evidence supporting clahn: 5 ~~ I If~~~~Ë:#J;'L~ CHECKLIST. A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the reqnest. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to linllt the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan aJld building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless linllting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the iterns or suggest the addition of extra iterns, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties - g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing aJld proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other puhlic ways within or adjacent to the development - j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional informarlon required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed - q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Date Signature of applicant 6 " > " ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Ernest Edward Sweetenberg Proposed Zoning: 1-2 Tax Map No 26.19-1-59 ~ 30. 1.96 Ac ? 7056 50. 1.65 Ac. 0 / ~ ~~ O~ City of Roanoke Pia 37.07-1-5 r::-3 County of Roanoke I) Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-û798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl Date r«cived: Received by: PCIBZA date: - v", e r 2oc'l PIaoanIs issued: Check: type of application filed (check all that apply) - RezOning II Special Use - Variance U Waiver - Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address w/zip ~es RillCrf",;pf'\&t\t Vlrs:/I:a,/.LC 3QO2. ¡,¡est. MO.:" Si:. 54-laM/V... ZI./IS3 C/o j"y t:. 'i~t- G(c.t""llW"\~ .)(,(,,-3'-100 Phone: Work: CellI: Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip S/ltYl& Phone I: Work: Fax No. I: Propeny Location AcJ,¡au..t /:.0 3Qot I.).st 1"\cI.:^ S~. Magisterial District: Co..t£lo!ba. Community Planning area: Glen r Tax Map.,No.:5S.0) -3 - V,tI, tI.1 Existing Zoning: C. 2- Existing land Use: VCl.C4n t Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 7.7 Ac:. Proposed Zoning:C-'2.. Proposed Land Use: C",:pNnt S&lest'R""t;,.1 Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes'þ(. NoD IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? IF NO. A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes D Yes~ NoD NoD Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Secôon(s): Appeal of loterpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roaooke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RlSIW VIAA RlSIW V/AA RlSIW V/AA rn Consultation E§i 8 In" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee Application /' Metes and bounds description Proffers. if applicable Justification Water and sewer application /' Adjoining propeny owners I hereby cenify that I am either the owner of the propeny or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner, ~ f). ~ ~ A,1!t\'I:' Owner's Signature /(ß.ld..,el\ W""tc JlSSOC\oWS 2 .for Jc...e5 R:vt'r £,&u:rt'Wl\t V¡,':";4/ .LC, r,3 Applicant James River Equipment Virginia, LLC The Plaoning Commission will study rezoning, special use pennit or waiver requests to detennine the need and justification for the change in tenDS of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thorouglùy as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthe" the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The stated purpose for the C-2 General Commercial District is to 'provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area... serving large areas of the county' . James River Equipment is a well established equipment rental, sales and service business located on Rte. 11/460 west of Salem. They have been in business at this location for more than 15 years and serve a large portion of southwest Virginia. The purpose of the development is to construct a new, larger building on the parcel adjacent to the existing facility, that will improve service to their customers by updating and expanding the parts inventory and service bays. The existing facility will remain and serve as equipment storage. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed construction will greatly improve the appearance and functionality of parcels currently zoned C-2, but not in use at this time, by constructing a new building that is attractively landscaped. The look of the new building will be an improvement over the existing facility and will be in character with surrounding facilities within the commercial and industrially zoned properties nearby. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Construction of the proposed facility is a substantial improvement over the existing structures currently occupying the project site. There will be little or no impact on adjacent properties. All stormwater will be captured and routed through the pond to be constructed at the back of the lot adjacent to the railroad. Since the existing building will become storage and the number of persons using the facility is not expected to increase, there will be no impact on existing public services. Several of the existing entrances will be consolidated into one entrance constructed to VDOT commercial entrance standards. This will improve access to the site as well as safety on Rle. 11/460 and will also improve the roadside appearance. There will be no impacts on schools, parks/recreation or fire/rescue. 3 f-3 A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan sball graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rewnings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pennitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit. Site plan and building pennit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rewning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the wning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rewning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS L a. Applicant name and name of development ~ b. Date, scale and north arrow £ c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions ./' d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties v e. Physical features sucb as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. /' f. ~g. /' h. /'i. The wning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces ..L j. Additional infonnatlon required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPliCANTS ..L. k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site ,/' 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections /' o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants ..IA p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed ~ q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ~tJ.~ . ~t 19nature ofappl' t . ClLldlJal' IJ~'I-k AsSoc\Q.-Æs for ~1"I.5 RIver [$,,1p,.eitt V1~;,,:a,UC I/m/o'f Date 6 ~~~ ¡ '" f.3 8~1 Bi~~ ~ ~ i ~ !!~t¡ ~ ~r f~ is ~i ~~ g I ¡¡ I;; f' r : II I!! ! ill 1;41 ~I;;i i~i if Io:~ ~I!! ~ '" q I §~I II~ I!! ~~ ~:~ fill ~ i ì ¡:IL ¡~ ~~~~ !!i. Iii ~III 'I' II ~;¡: ~~II"I~ ~ U I. -I ~¿I ~~. l.l~ !¡I: ìi: ~ ~r!~ Iii!: ~ f' "I!! ill ì~~ 8~1 di i i I ~ 1;;1 ~ ~ ~I~ !§~ à II ¡is ¡il ~Š<o i!! II.. ~ g ~ !! !! ~ i ~ ~ !~I t:t:t: !!! 111111 ~n & e :cr î 1 . . z t 8 ."54 \ ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "" Applicants name: James River Equipment VA, LLC Zoning: Rezoning from Special Use (C2) to C2 Tax Map No. 55.03-3-20/21/21.1 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning ~-4 . 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address wlzip Member One Federal Credit Union P. O. Box 12288 Roanoke, Virginia 24024-2288 Phone: (540) 982-8811, Ext. 9130 Work: Cell#: Fax No.: (540) 982-7534 Owner's name/address wlzip William H. Shackelford 2708 East Kings Road Vir inia Beach Vir inia 23452 Property Location Intersection of Route 419 and Bower Road: 4975 Bower Road Tax Map No.: 076.07-03-22 Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Community Planning area: Transition Existing Zoning: R-1 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: ~ Existing Land Use: Residential for financial institution use - Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and ftontage requITements of the requested district? Yes X No 0 IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes Ii IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0 No 0 VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): Appeal ofInterpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RIsrw V/AA RIsrw V/AA RIsrw V/AA E§ Consultation Ei 81/2"xlI"conceptplan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner oftl1el'roperty or the owner's agent or C,ontract urchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent ofthe owner. Mll1BE ONE CREDIT ION B : Owner's Si ature 2 Applicant Member One Federal Credi t Union The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the appJicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The County Zoning Ordinance recognizes that C-1 (Office District) uses are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred or near existing residential development where the C-1 development would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. This proposed office for Member One Federal Credit Union, located at the intersection of Route 419 and Bower Road, is appropriate for the location. Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Comprehensive Plan recomnends transition uses on this property. The proposed office for Member One Federal Credit Union is consistent with the recommendations set forth in the Transition land use category of the ColTlßlmity Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the SUITOunding area, as well as the impacts on pubJic services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parksfrecreation and fire and rescue. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of the developnent of this property. 3 A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pemritting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pemrit. Site plan and building pennit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use pennit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use pennit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staffmav exelI1Pt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minllnum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties - g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces -j. Additional infonnation required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, stonn drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers In. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent [¡re hydrants - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed - q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. MEMBER ONE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION Signatur~an~latte, its attorney rl).:!>iJy Date 6 FY DESCRIPTION OF TAX PARCEL NUMBER 076.07-03-22.00 LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: BEGINNING at a point along the southerly side of Etheridge Road, being the common northerly point between Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, Section 1, City View Heights; thence running in a southerly direction between said Lot 3 and Lot 4, 278.4 feet to a point along the northerly side of Bower Road; thence along the northerly side of Bower Road in a westerly direction, 160 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with a curve to the right, 33.9 feet to a point along the easterly side of Route 419; thence in a northerly direction along the easterly side of Route 419, 240 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with a curve to the right, 22.46 feet to a point on the southerly side of Etheridge Road; thence along the southerly side of Etheridge Road in an easterly direction, 220 feet, more or less, to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and being Part of Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 1, Section 1, City View Heights, being Tax Parcel Number 076.07-03-22.00, containing 1.354 acres, more or less. "'H"~:;. ;;~";;:'~;7~;:""""'~::~:~;3;^"<- urr "~"~T~"~ ~ 'u.,,"~o.,.,., r II ¡ILARRV&W. HUMPHREY 11-- k3 D4'O3t3Cp ShllOOKllllf'ol"d ¡ !I,:, , 770-91>6-2105 , """"'...r.M4'1 15'0;1 II ,' :lll Ii ;' I: ; II, Betty A. 1- - WiDilni H. SbIoIc8JfcH. : Or ROIftOIœ eo- TM MIIP p~ Nq, 076.07-O3-U, which Is t.Iíe 'P'fII*'Y .SIItJiject~ Þù Jlldtl~ ....,. -- to ibis wez",m~ prtiUðlll fiJad '" M...., Qne 'edM1 CJIfít U¡¡d6' ~ ....'", ".,.,.. by the çønrJhions chit ueprom.tlatbilpltlrloo.' :: !.,' r..,.,.,'"",,-, FAGE 02 F-ý p.g p,B2,-æ ! 1- ¡ , I, !: ,. ...lil.W1i\PI~~ 1f1i'\ 11- .1 t H!! \\ I' ij ..."( 1111 ~ ~-- ....-."..... ~uno:¡ aJoueoH 6~" e¡noH °IUn ~!paJ:> auo Jaqwaw \m~11 r. -------------- / 2222 AA90 p..y Banbury Ln. 4480 4460 4440 49. 2230 Rd. Etb,eridge ~ C1> ~ ¿>' C1> 19. 1 21. 20. Z ning -1 4959 4951 4965 'i ~ ~ Rd. 4962 25. 26. ROAN£KE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Member One Federal Credit Union Zoning: Rezoning from Rt to ct Ta.:r: Map No. 76.07-03-22 ¡: - 5 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only Received by: 5204 Bernard Drive P a Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Applicadon fee: PC¡¡¡;¡';'date: Placards issued: 'i~ifi'~~is Che&' type of application f1Ied (check all that apply) r:rRezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance Case Number Applicants name/address whip . 11 . "?AM L. l.t~.1Z.'tN ,:J'R '79'14 Lt\.4D 11£1.) ~ lJIa(Z.cr:.",fi..~ {/ ~Å'\ZO'( 1Z0A.NoICfi:/V.4-. ,-, ,...,. 2401'ê5 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Phone: 114 - t:?'7I'7' ~~~: ~~~o Fax No.: 34'Z..~,41 Owner's name/address w/zip 4.6.1"'\~ Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: <2/ !tt:.u£. Magisterial District: W \ Ñ-p¿;.o12. I.-l \ LL <; Community Planning area: Existing Zorring: A.tl +- A.G. '3 82 z~ï1~(~,,~k~Çl# t!ß1ffßiM£tr~!f.~l:~t4!~4m:~@.§ð¥J... ...:-... Proposed Zoning: pgp Proposed Land Use' 12 ¿Dr! ¡:"D. ,S'IWI:L/t. 19l",(.'r £/UJ1JtrNct£.. . IAJIT'JI ð~"" ~ ¡J,>IT> 3 ð/JTIoJI!l'(I.t:JfLf. Does the pi!ícel meet the minimum lot area, width., and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes'/" No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes./' No IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes" No Existing Land Use: : -'.""""""""'-"""-"-""'0_...,. :iiiJkii~:¡f~~: NvP'1Þ~i4}~fu:j~~ijiiiif{ijrm¡jji,.".:",. ..:. ',., """'- ,.... VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinam:e in order to: Appeal of Zoning Adnrinistrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? PI ease check if encIosed. APPLICATION WlLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. VJSIW V/AA RJSIW VIAA RJSIW V/AA 83 Consultation Eji 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan E8 Applkation fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, jf applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I bereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge ",d' consent of the owner. ~ .9. ø~ I Owner's Signature (-S I {¡:~~?,G~!tP.LAN CIŒCKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with Ibe application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, Ibe plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, Ibe applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan Ibat is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance wilb State and County development regulations and may require changes to Ibe initial 'concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special nse permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to Ibe extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detJlil may Varj, depending on Ibe nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some oflbe items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS .::!.- a. Applicant name and name of development ~ b. Date, scale and north arrow / c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions L d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties -L e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. L f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties ~ g. All property lines and easements ./ h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ....!- 1. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or olber public ways within or adjacent to the development ~ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional infonnatÌon required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANIS clfl. k. ~l. ...:::: m. ~n. ~ o. ZP. rllt.. q. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm draills) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify Ibat all items requITed in the checklist above are complete. ~c.- ~ ø'~ .1- Signature of applicant 4/u../o+ Date 6 (--5 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REZONJNG REQUEST The subject tract of this PRD consists of97 acres of timbered woodland. The timber on about 90% of this tract was cut about 5 years ago. Already, the site is showing positive signs of natural regeneration of the forest. Over 50% of the adjoining boundary is vacant woodland. A large portion of the proposed 36 acre open space was not timbered and has a pristine mountain stream flowing thru. It is the intent to keep this area in an untouched state for all in the development to enjoy. The highlight of the development is the spectular views of the valley and the surrounding mountains and the extensive walking trails thru the 36 acre open space. By limiting the number of home sites we feel this is the highest and best use of the land. - 1 - This request furthers the purpose of the Roanoke County AR zoning ordinance by offering very low density of single family residences utilizing the natural terrain in a gentle way. The site is outside the urban service area ( only 6.5 miles to Cave Spring Comers) but convenient to major retail, office space, restaurants, and major medical facilities. Agriculture will not be encouraged because of the wooded nature of this tract. - 2- The developer will oversee the development by requiring an individual site plan on each lot. The site plan will be developed by an approved landscape architect and will be subject to the developers approval following specific site criteria. That is, houses will be required to use natural exterior materials and colors to blend in with the natural woodland setting. Houses are not to be built on steep slopes. Houses wiIJ have a F'S minimum of 1600 square feet and be limited in height of 45 feet and to be sensitive to the surrounding view sheds. All of the building sites are not visible to any of the adjoining existing homes. Furthermore, no houses will be closer than 150 feet to another house within the development. Yard space wiIJ be limited to allow the forest to regenerate which wiIJ assure privacy between the home sites. No temporary structures shall be used as a residence at any time. 3- There will be no impact on the adjoining properties because the home sites are not in close proximity or visible to them. The home sites wiIJ have private well and septic, underground electric, telephone and cable thus not requiring any public infrastructure. The streets wiIJ be private and maintained by the homeowners association .Because of the low density and targeted market of retirees there will be minimal impact on the schools. Fire and rescue wiIJ not be strained because ofthe low density .Parks and recreation will be provided within the development by the walking trails. Street grades at intersections are 5 %. Site distances are 350 feet or more. Streets in the development are within a 50 foot right of way. See the typical road section for details. ¡¡~ . -!> .~~~~ ~~!>~~ g"~' .iMi! ~In;~ a. ¡h ~. ~~ .~~f~ . Õ,;" ". : >Iiii: ,~~!.: ~I~g !: i i~; I ï iH ~;~~ q Ii ;: H¡II q . !~ ! ;, Iii ' .. . ~~ .~~~;~ , g;~:I: 1~2' < r ~ , ~r . II§~~ , Ii ~ I~ ~. . ;1 ;!~ !~ !~i i" . . œ, "Z.Jf ~ Z f~f ~ ~ ~. ð ~ ~ ~ 'HsS~ ~'5+~ ~. ~i § ~~<>:<:t::ð",~~::1:.'5 '~~ì. "::-;iiJ3~~[(j¡<jo;~ ~ f.' ~~">': .~ '~"i'J"[(j !!~'i ~ ~H "'<l.g~~~ ~~ i~~~* ~~. ~0)~~"8b¡;;~ "~' .~i.:i!~~~~ g",~ I<.! ~~7-.¡tJ~~§JI.'~5! I ~~~ ~~::¡¡~~ ~fÈ~" g I~ò':i::'¡~~~ ~ ~... '" ~ '" ~~ ~~ ~ C'< e:o Q. ~ ~ ;> " I:; k bs- (B ih ~.!. t~:~ !i~g "~~ .~ . ~ :J ~ " . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , 7 .. .&&f~ ,.'~' :l~li~ ~g ., .~¡~ .,~.. . i¡i~ ~~ ~ ".....'c ......" (5 <;¡...,o.'"""""""" ,.,w"",, ",..... ,,-, L...EG¡E.N D - Of~~ ~,.,C!!. ?ci COK'TO""" -t1tA..\IJ~"I>.I~"!> - 1<1""'-KI¡'¡..~\'-S "!<Of""""'" ",........ "~~\.!õ ~u~a 'i\U>;, -.:-<h ME~CEPE~ t20Jo.IJO"-E. COù!-JT,(, ""-"t-e' ,". ZOO' VII<.Go\N\.4. (7..,1:.4,2.\,04 DAN CHITWOOD CERTI'lED lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT '.0.'°"""" "'AND", '^ ,."', ,"O"""""-""" """","""""",,"/WWw.o=Nlwoodoom / - \"/FT - '¡dr"/F-i, . ",.0... . . .'" ~ , I I UI~ 111",*' I Có~P~!ì '5U6~~J I (;ø' MIN. ~' ~11~ DAN CHITWOOD c",""""""""""".oRCKÆC"< f\- ==..';."'- H~"""""'" F5 ~., PjliOlo'tlNOVo;, P.!>.\J5f..tei\.Ji (~.t1» 8.~~ (2\ a\e2IÅ.) 1-4.0..1. ~' '~(kr T1?l CA L Q¡:;þ."Q' <;€c.TtON \-I\E.QCEæ~ H€\Gtl-1TS SHEET NO.: OF: County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning ¡:-iÞ(Q) . 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Check type of application filed (check all that apply) :10 Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address w/zip Kahn Develo¡:ment Company 3321 Forest Drive, Suite 11-3 Columbia, South Carolina 29204 Phone: ~RK(540) 224-8018~FAX (540) 224-8050 GœIkit Maryen F. Goodlatte, Esq. ~x Attorn~ for Applicant Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: See attached Schedule A ~i)- ,fi .Y \"~\ \V ~~ Pr~%~cation ~ parcels located along Route 419/ Keagy Road or-!"" .f: g~:î.:::~ Tax Map No.: 67.18-02-01; 67.18 92 02; Magisterial District: Community Planning area: Existing Zoning: 67 .18-02-01 use (office/retail/aBEi possible .."",lJ"uLldl) developme t Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No D IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the núnimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes IX IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No D NoD V ariance/W aiver of Section( s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation ofSection(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Rlsrw V/AA RlS/W V/AA RJS/W V/AA § Consultation Ei 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner ofthe ¡>ro~ or the owner's a ent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. KAHN- D MPANY B : Owner's Si ature 2 Applicant Kahn DeveloIJIlent CD~any The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the: change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space ifnecessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The CDlmty's zoning ordinance recognizes that C2 (General CDIImercial Districts) are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large se@TIents of the CDlmty's population. This project, located at the intersection of Route 419 and Keagy Road is appropriate for the location. Its mixed use design and nature (office/retail/and possible residential) provides a buffer for the existing residential neighborhoods behind this developnent. Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Mixed use oriented toward Route 419 and Keagy Road promotes the policies contained in the COlmty I s CDlIII11.mity Plan. The proffered conditions in particular are intended to assure a high quality development which will serve the economic and lifestyle needs of the cO!ll!llmity while buffering the existing residential neighborhoods behind the proposed development. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of the development of this property. Necessary turn lanes off Route 419 to provide proper ingress and egress to the facility will be provided. Public sewer will be extended. Improvements to Keagy Road are contemplated. 3 f-~ (0. ) A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising ftom the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, COITeet any deficiencies that may not be manageable by COW1ty pernritting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pernrit. Site plan and building pennit procedures ensure compliance with State and COW1ty development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Uuless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use pernrit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use pernrit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The COW1ty Planning Division staff mav exenmt some of the items or SU22est the addition of ex1ra items, but the followm2 are considered minimwn: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow f. - g. h. - j. c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke COW1ty tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as groW1d cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development i. Dimensions and locations ofall driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. I. Existing utilities (water, sewer, stonn drains) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed - q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. KAHN DEVELOPMENT CŒ1PANY sdk:ft.... r ~~U; Sign eofapplicant ryellen F. Goodlatte, Üs Attorney / 1;)'3/~0Cf/ Date 6 VIRGINIA: INRE: F-t., (a) BEFORE THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS KAHN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY VOLUNTARY PROFFER OF CONDITIONS REZONING OF TAX MAP NUMBERS: 67.18-02-01 (9.8471 acres) Portion of 67.14-02-02 (5.047 acres) Portion of67.14-02-04 (1.076 acres) Applicant, Kahn Development Company, hereby proffers that the above-referenced property, if rezoned to C-2, commercial, will be developed as follows: 1. Concept Plan: The property shall be developed in substantial confonnity with the concept plan dated May 10, 2004, made by DMR Architecture, P.LLc., subject to those changes that are required by the County during comprehensive site plan review and subject to petitioner's right to relocate or reconfigure the buildings, service areas and parking layouts shown on the concept plan. The entire site will include sidewalks connecting all buildings to encourage pedestrian connectivity between all uses and parking areas. 2. All buildings shall be designed to be compatible with one another. All facades of buildings shall be of similar design, compatible materials and similar detailing. 3. Plazas, hardscape, landscaped areas and site amenities shall also be compatible to the established building character and shall include outdoor seating areas, varied paving materials to add contrast and texture, and decorative containers with seasonal landscape. Restaurant tenants will be encouraged to provide outdoor dining areas with tables, chairs and umbrellas. 4. Roofline treatment shall be of compatible design on all buildings. 5. Single, large building masses without articulated facades shall not be pennitted. Large building walls shall be required to incorporate multidimensional design features, such as, changes in plane, canopies, 6. 7. 8. 9. f--~((¡) awnings, dimensional signage, windows, doors, facias, arcades, and changes in texture, material and color or vary in height to add interest. Retaining walls shall be subject to proffers 7 and 8 relating to construction materials or be composed oftextured keystone blocks. Required screening of service and trash areas shall be with finish materials compatible with the adjacent building. The loading area to the west of the proposed 36,000 square foot store shall be screened with a freestanding wall with similar finish as the adjacent building. Acceptable building finishes include: a. b. c. d. brick wood, vinyl or composite wood substitute lap siding and trim glass, with clear glass required in retail storefronts stucco or exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) stone face colored concrete block stone or cast stone standing seam metal, copper, composite slate tile or asphalt shingle on roofs visible to the public e. f. g. The following building finishes are prohibited: a. b. unpainted or bare metal panels 4 x 8 plywood or composite panels bare exposed concrete that is not exposed aggregate, hammered, sandblasted or covered with a cement-based acrylic coating unfinished wood other than cedar, mahogany, teak or redwood. c. d. Site Lighting: a. All lighting near the property lines shall be shielded "cut off' types to internalize illumination and avoid spillover to adjacent sites and public roads. Sidewalks shall be illuminated with decorative pedestrian-scaled pole or building mounted luminaries. Plazas may be illuminated similar to sidewalks but may include additional feature lighting for attractions and outdoor dining. Landscape lighting may be employed to enhance site entrance and feature areas. No exposed neon or fluorescent lighting shall be pennitted. The maximum height of freestanding light fixtures shall be 30 feet. b. c. e. f. g. 2 10. 11. F ~ (I) Site Signage: a. b. Off premises signs (billboards) shall not be allowed on the property. The main freestanding multi-sided project identification sign shall be located on Route 419 and shall be monument style utilizing materials approved as acceptable building materials and shall not exceed 25 feet in height. Minor freestanding entrance signs shall be multi-sided monument style and shall not exceed 10 feet in height. Tenant signage visible to off-site shall be encouraged to be creative in order to add interest and texture and, in addition to letters, may include logos and images. Projecting blade signs and projecting three-dimensional signs are also encouraged. Box signs, exposed raceways and exposed neon are prohibited. Signage may be internally or externally illuminated. c. d. Non-specialty drive-in or fast food restaurants and gasoline stations shall not be pennitted. Establislunents primarily serving specialty foods (such as coffee, baked goods, e.g.) with drive-through windows are not included within this prohibition but would require a special use permit in accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Drive- through windows are not permitted directly facing the street unless they are completely screened. 12. The developer shall comply with all VDOT requirements for improvements to adjoining Route 419 and Keagy Road including any required easements for sight distance as well as the donation of any additional right-of-way along Keagy Road and Route 419. Respectfully submitted, Kahn Development Company 3 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl ¡: - {¡¡ (b') . 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Check type ofapplication filed (check all that apply) :K] Rezoning D Special Use D Variance Applicants name/address wlzip Kahn Developnent Company 3321 Forest Drive, Suite 11-B Columbia, South Carolina 29204 DWaiver D Adnrinistrative Appeal Owner's nameladdress wlzip Phone: :(540) 2~~~~U~/~~~ia~~~~8~~. ~ Attorney for Applicant Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: See attached Schedule A along Route 419/ Magisterial District Proposed Zoning: C2 Proposed Land Use: Mixed llSe (office/retail/and possible residential) developme t Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No D IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the núnimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes IX IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes D NoD NoD VariancelWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Adnrinistrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section( s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WJLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF TIlESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RIS/W V/AA RIS/W V/AA RISIW V/AA ~ Consultation Ei 8112" x II" concept plan E8 Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the ~ or the owner's a ent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. KAHN- D MPANY B : ~ Owner's Si alure 2 f...Io(4) Zoning R2 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Kahn Development Proposed Zoning: C-2 Existing Zoning: C1,R2 and C1C Tax Map No. 67.18-2-1 and Portion Company of 67.14-2-2&:,4 .. -9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M h ~~ ~ Iì "' II! ~~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~~g¡ ! ii ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ <.> - ~ ~~ ,~ ~2§~1 G~ II lil!~n II II dUiU 19 n ~ 5 0 ~ " I ~ ~ - - -.,._u I,:! fi 1:: - ~ Q) E ~ ~ lij¡ , :z ::s e... l- e... W <.) :z 0 <.) I ¡ UJ C)m ::s:~ .-.J~ » >-.: C)~ <c::: UJ 0 ~'" \\ ~I . !iI ¡'I "" .... :I¡ I-<-< ".. 'I "":::' . ¡;¡¡ "" ,¿¡ ¡Hi ',I Q ", ,. ,il~-- ,,' \ ~:"> ~ ;¡ -- COUNTRY EAST u.c 'II> ",,""...-. '\,\ v.;~B£~:::::;;' ~.Æru.C -~ EDWNt>a.... " ...~'tt..""':ä'.m'.., \ // ' ", "~""f"'.A" /p .. I \\./' .,../ """"".. " p CCUH1RY EAST u.c iÆ.V "q-~", "Y'.'\""'""".""""" ","".":;,' 7' ~œ':O' ~ ';,//////;;;:~à"""~~ ", ,//:,' ,:..\.. ...Nt>a.. '""',..."........... >".,' .. ""'"",=-~' . . ,.. ~ ,', ,~ \\;\. '" 0/ ".\,"','" ~ PROPERTY TO REZONED , TO 0-20 , " ... \ ' ' "'\~ " ~\'v: . 1b\ '~ ".J..\ EARLT!"A'~(J/<S "'J.:li':C:'" -_\ fA (í) í; I PROPÈRTY EX HANGE PROI'ERTY ro ED....., B. ...... ......""',"""-- """'-"'.',,1-1 .."OO "'" ,"""- - "..... "'"..,-, ...,,""","""-- """,-"",..H .",,""',"""-- .""""'1",""" .,..,""""""- SKETCH SHO"NG A LANa EXCHANGE BE"'EN KAHN DEVELOPMENT ANa EDWARD B. VIA SlUATE ALOOG VA. RTE. 419 ood KEAGY ROAD -~-"""" ~CWA CALDWELL WHITE ASSOCIATES -,-,- =~~&:.::':;;""I_~ ::-îl.- -:-.t:~ NOl£, EXAC' Mms ANa BOUNOS FOR TIlE PRCf>ERTY EXCHANGE AR£ TO BE VERI~EO BY AN AClUAL me SURm, ""S SKETCH HAS BmI PREPARED "THOOT THE BENEF1T OF A TITLE REPORT ANa "'EREFORE MAY NOT IN~CATE All. ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE PROPERTIES, '. ~ ,,'<' .; :;:5) '.. (\ "\~V HERBER""'I"r' ,j""RIDE """"...., L:;'!.:~;;' "'"" Œ\<UI'W<I ="" ~.. -.. 'rc~ "'f'.ìU' ,."",.,~,.., d"",_~" «r "\ \~ }'" ~.........",. E'::!-: «r m' 0' .... - ,-.«r""""""",-, ; " Applicant Kahn Developnent Company The Planning Connnission will study rezo1Úng, special use permit or waiver requests to detemúne the need and justification for the change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space ifnecessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zo1Úng district classification in the Zo1Úng Ordinance. The Cotmty's zoning ordinance recògnizes that C2 (General Conmercial Districts) are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large se@TIents of the Cotmty's population. This project, located at the intersection of Route 419 and Keagy Road is appropriate for the location. Its mixed use design and nature (office/retail/and possible residential) provides a buffer for the existing residential neighborhoods behind this develoIXDent. Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Mixed use oriented toward Route 419 and Keagy Road promotes the policies contained in the County's Corrmunity Plan. The proffered conditions in particular are intended to assure a high quality development which will serve the economic and lifestyle needs of the comnnrnity while buffering the existing residential neighborhoods behind the proposed development. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoiDing properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fife and rescue. No negative linpacts are anticipated as a result of the development of this property. Necessary turn lanes off Route 419 to provide proper ingress and egress to the facility will be provided. Public sewer will be extended. Improvements to Keagy Road are contemplated. 3 Property and Owner Tax Map Number 67.18-02-01 67.18-02-02 67.18-02-03 67.18-02-04 F-l.lb) SCHEDULE A COUNTY OF ROANOKE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION FOR REZONING Name/Address of Owners Owner/address Existing Zoning Herbert D. McBride 5105 Greenfield Street, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Cl Country East, LLc. P. O. Box 4143 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Rl Country East, LLC. P. O. Box 4143 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Rl Country East, LLC. P. O. Box 4143 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 R1 f-l. (Þ) SCHEDULE B COUNTY OF ROANOKE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION FOR REZONING CommunitY Planning Area Tax Map Parcel 67.18-02-01 is identified as Transition in the 1998 Comprehensive Development Plan. The other three parcels are identified as Development in the 419 Development Plan and Neighborhood Conservation in the 1998 Comprehensive Development Plan. r-b (b) A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shan graphicany depict the land use change, deve10pment or variance that is to be coru;idered. Further, the plan shan address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditioru; to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County deve10pment regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditioru; are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applicatioru;. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff mav exenIDt some of the items or SU22est the addition of extra items, but the fonowin2 are coru;idered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development - g. h. -j. b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimeru;ions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of an adjacent properties An property lines and easements An buildings, existing and proposed, and dimeru;ions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of an existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of an driveways, parking spaces and Ioading spaces i. Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS - p. - q. k. Existing utiIities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site L Þilly driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers In. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locatioru; of an adjacent fife hydrants Þilly proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule o. I certify that an items required in the checklist above are complete. KAHN DEVELOPMENT CŒ1PANY sdt;ft-. r ~'.o&k-'--ú Sign e of applicant ryellen F. Goodlatte, its Attorney / /~3/;:¿0C(I Date 6 r# '" (b) Description of 9.8471 Acre Parcel (Tax Parcel 67.18-2-1) BEGINNING at a concrete right of way monument at the intersection of the westerly right of way of Electric Road (Va. Route 419) and the northerly right of way of Keagy Road (VA Sec. Route 685); thence leaving Electric Road and with the northerly right of way of Keagy Road, S. 20°49'15" W., 79.64 feet to a concrete right of way monument; thence continuing with said right of way, S. 57°25'43" W., 66.62 feet to a concrete right of way monument; thence continuing with said right of way on a curve to the right whose radius is 954.93 feet, whose length is 124.12 feet, and whose chord is S. 61 °36'34" W., 124.03 feet to a concrete right of way monument; thence continuing with said right of way, S. 65°28'00" W., 4.22 feet to a point; thence continuing with said right of way, S. 24°32'00" E., 19.74 feet to a point; thence continuing with said right of way, S. 63°36'48" W., 117.26 feet to a point; thence continuing with said right of way, S. 60°31' 48" W., 302.30 feet to a point; thence leaving the right of way of Keagy Road and with the property of Annie M. Hall (DB 400, Pg. 142), N. 30°06'12" W., 226.70 feet to a point; thence continuing with the property of Annie M. Hall, N. 34°35'12" W., 129.30 feet to a point; thence continuing with the property of Annie M. Hall, N. 45°09'12" W., 269.81 feet to a point, an iron pin found bears S. 34°55'01"W., 0.41 feet £Tom the corner; thence leaving the property of Annie M. Hall and with the property of Edward B. Via (WB 48, Pg. 1100), N. 34°55'01" E., 458.49 feet to an iron pin found; thence continuing with the property of Edward B. Via, S. 54°13'12" E., 433.83 feet to an iron pin found; thence continuing with the property of Edward B. Via, S. 82°01 '12" E., 272.80 feet to an iron pin found in the westerly right of way of Electric Road; thence leaving the Via property and with the right of way of Electric Road on a curve to the left whose radius is 1,712.02 feet, whose length is 194.46 feet, and whose chord is S. 15°18'01" E., 194.35 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 9.8471 acres, being all of the property conveyed to Otis H. and Mary N. McBride in DB 427, Pg. 267 as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke and being as shown on Boundary Survey for Kahn Development Company by Caldwell White Associates dated 18 Nov. 2003. Description of 2.634 Acre Parcel (Tax Parcel 67.18-2-2) BEGINNING at an iron pin found at the southeast comer of the property of Annie M. Hall (DB 400, Pg. 142), and being on the line of the property of Jean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz, and Heather E. Wertz (DB 1613, Pg. 1509) and the northerly right of way of Keagy Road; Thence leaving the right of way of Keagy Road and with the property of Stultz and Wertz, N. 29° 51'20" W., 291.37 feet to a point; Thence continuing with the Stultz and Wertz property N. 45° 09' 25" W., 228.39 feet to a point, an iron pin found bears N. 39° 48' 35" W., 1.94 feet £Tom the comer; Thence leaving the Stultz and Wertz property and with the property of Edward B. Via (WB 48, Pg. 1100) N. 34° 55' 01" E., passing an iron pin found at 200.53 feet, for a total distance of 200.94 feet to a point; Thence leaving the Via property and with the property of Herbert D. McBride (WB 57, F-Io(b) Pg. 18) S. 45° 09'12" E., 269.81 feet to a point; Thence continuing with the McBride property S. 34° 35' 12" E., 129.30 feet to a point; Thence continuing with the McBride property S. 30° 06' 12" E., 226.70 feet to a point in the northerly right of way of Keagy Road; Thence leaving the McBride property and with the right of way of Keagy Road, S. 65° 19' 09" W., 205.17 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 2.634 acres, and being all of the property conveyed to Annie M. Hall in DB 400, Pg. 142 recorded in the Office ofthe Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and being shown on Boundary Survey for Country East LLC, dated 18 November 2003 by Caldwell White Associates. Description of 1.116 Acre Parcel (Tax: Parcel 67.18-2-3) Starting at a point in Keagy Road, said point being the southwest comer of Parcel I of the property conveyed to Jean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz, and Heather E. Wertz (DB 1613, Pg 1509), Thence leaving Keagy Road and with the property of Earle C. and Marcelene Atkins (DB 806 Pg. 579) and Quit Claim DB 892 Pg. 242), S. 28° 39' 25" E. 295.16 feet to a point, the TRUE POJNT OF BEGINN1NG, an iron pin found bears N. 76° 41' II" E. 0.90 feet from the comer; Thence with the property of Atkins and Curtis D. & Ethel V. Peters (DB 844 Pg. 61), N. 60° 36' 39" W., passing and iron pin found at 56.70, for a total of 100.92 feet to an iron pin found; Thence leaving the Peters property and with the property of The Mounfield Family Limited Partnership (DB 1553 Pg. 1691) N. 34° 29' 20" E. 60.06 feet to an iron pin found; Thence leaving the Mounfield property and with the property of Edward B. Via (WB 48 Pg. 1100), N. 34° 55'01" E. 257.23 feet to a point, an iron pin found bears N. 39°48'35" W. 1.94 feet ITom the comer; Thence leaving the Via property and with the property of Annie M. Hall (DB 400 Pg. 142), S. 45°09'25" E. 228.39 feet to a point; Thence leaving the Hall property and with the northerly line of Parcel I of the Stultz and Wertz property, S. 59°44'35" W 295.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 1.1159 acres, being all of Parcel II conveyed to Jean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz, and Heather E. Wertz in DB 1613 Pg. 1509 as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, and being as shown on Boundary Survey for Country East LLC by Caldwell White Associates dated 18 November 2003. Description of 2.0516 Acre Parcel (Tax: Parcel 67.18-2-4) BEGINNING at a point in Keagy Road, said point being the southwest comer of Parcel I of the property conveyed to Jean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz, and Heather E. Wertz (DB 1613, Pg 1509), Thence leaving Keagy Road and with the property of Earle C. and Marcelene Atkins (DB 806 Pg. 579) and Quit Claim DB 892 Pg. 242), S. 28° 39' 25" E. 295.16 feet to a point, an iron pin found bears N. 76° 41' II" E. 0.90 feet from the comer; Thence leaving the Atkins property and with the southerly line of Parcel II of the property ofJean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz and Heather E. Wertz (DB 1613 Pg. 1509), f...{. ( b) N. 59° 44' 35" E. 295.51 feet to a point; Thence leaving the aforesaid Parcel II and with the westerly line of the property of Annie M. Hall (DB 400 Pg. 142), S. 29° 51' 20" E., passing an iron pin found at 291.37 feet, for a total of 303.48 feet to a point in Keagy Road; Thence with Keagy Road S. 61° 20' 35" W. 301.74 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 2.0516 acres, being all of Parcel I conveyed to Jean W. Stultz, Michael B. Wertz, and Heather E. Wertz in DB 1613 Pg. 1509 as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, and being as shown on Boundary Survey for Country East LLC by Caldwell White Associates dated 18 November 2003. 1. f-/'(Þ} PROFFERED CONDITIONS KEAGY VILLAGE January 23, 2004 Concept Plan: a. The property shall be developed in substantial confoI111ity with the concept plan dated January 22, 2004 made by DMR Architecture, P.LLC., subject to those changes that are required by the County during comprehensive site plan review and subject to petitioner's right to relocate or reconfigure the buildings, service areas and parking layouts shown on the concept plan. Buildmg relocation, however, shall not change the overall concept of retail uses oriented toward Route 419 and Keagy Road, and office or residential uses buffering the retail uses nom the adjacent residential properties along Keagy Road. b. A nature/walking trail shall be incorporated into the design of the center. It is anticipated that the trail will be located along the edge of the property, where possible, and will provide walking opportunities for users of Keagy Village as well as neighbors by connecting to on-site sidewalks and street crosswalks. 2. All buildings shall be designed to be compatible with one another. All facades of buildings shall be of similar design, compatible materials and similar detailing. 3. Plazas, hardscape, landscaped areas and site amenities shall also be compatible to the established building character and shall include outdoor seating areas, varied paving materials to add contrast and texture, and decorative containers with seasonal landscape. Restaurant tenants will be encouraged to provide outdoor dining areas with tables, chairs and umbrellas. 4. Roofline treatment shall be of compatible design on all buildings. 5. Single, large building masses without articulated facades shall not be pennitted. Large walls shall be required to incorporate multidimensional design features, such as, changes in plane, canopies, awnings, dimensional signage, windows, doors, facias, arcades, and changes in texture, material and color or vary in height to add interest. 6. Required screening of service and trash areas shall be with finish materials compatible with the adjacent building. 7. 8. 9. F¿{ b) Acceptable building finishes include: a. brick b. wood, vinyl or composite wood substitute lap siding and trim c. glass, with clear glass required in retail storefronts d. stucco or exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) e. stone face colored concrete block f. stone or cast stone g. standing seam metal, copper, composite slate tile or asphalt shingle roof The fonowing building finishes are prohibited: a. unpainted or bare metal panels b. 4 x 8 plywood or composite panels c. bare exposed concrete that is not exposed aggregate, hammered, sandblasted or covered with a cement-based acrylic coating d. unfinished wood other than cedar, mahogany, teak or redwood. Site Lighting: a. An lighting near the property lines shall be shielded "cut off' types to internalize illumination and avoid spillover to adjacent sites and public roads. b. Sidewalks shan be illuminated with decorative pedestrian-scaled pole or building mounted luminaries. c. Plazas may be illuminated similar to sidewalks but may include additional feature lighting for attractions and outdoor dining. e. Landscape lighting may be employed to enhance site entrance and feature areas. f. No exposed neon or fluorescent lighting shall be permitted. 10. Site Signage: a. Off premises signs (billboards) shall not be allowed on the property. b. The main freestanding multi-sided project identification sign shan be at the comer of Keagy Road and Route 419 and shall be monument style utilizing materials approved as acceptable building materials and shall not exceed 25 feet in height. c. Minor freestanding entrance signs shan be multi-sided monument style and shall not exceed 10 feet in height. d. Tenant signage visible to off-site shall be encouraged to be creative in order to add interest and texture and, in addition to letters, may include logos and images. Projecting blade signs and projecting three-dimensional signs are also encouraged. Box signs, exposed raceways and exposed neon are prohibited. Signage may be internany or externally illuminated. 2 11. 12. P;(¡,{b) Non-specialty drive-in or fast food restaurants and gasoline stations shall not be pennitted. Establishments primarily serving specialty foods (such as coffee, baked goods, e.g.) with drive-through windows are not included within this prohibition. Drive-through windows are not pennitted directly facing the street unless they are completely screened. The Concept plan indicates offices uses buffering the retail uses from the adjacent residential properties along Keagy Road. Residential use may be substituted for up to 50% of the office square footage as pennitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Building configurations, building heights, number of buildings and parking layouts may vary to accommodate the residential substitution. 3 Zoning C1C f../,{j} f ~'¡. .,l"J ðy° ,. Existing Zoning C1 7. r ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ Applicants na'me: Kahn Develop'ment Proposed Zoning: C-2 Existing Zoning: C1 and R1 Tax Map No. 67.18-2-1.2.3.4 Co'mpany "'" ~ :~ . I . ¡II . I' . i~m111 .:E iHiÌ,Î Q ,.1," ;--------'-'-, I ~ . , ~ I~~ G' 0 ij I i~~ G' II I III Inn : hi mleR II xl , ~ w hm ~ ... f8~U~ d ~~ I I B i ~m~ ~ ~~~ ~nm n n _n______------_J ¡Ilil 1i11!1 I ¡¡!Iill ¡Ii iI ¡ 1: . ~ <I> ¡. <: E "I ..s::: c..;j, ~J!a ~ e.. l- e.. w u :z 01 ul w C). ::s~ -..I -~ ». >-.:: C)° «: w~ ::::.::: F-¿(b) f-¿{b) " " // .' !I ;\ : \ ='-~ : I I , I : i G'" p,. S ~~ ',.~ 7 n1ìt-l!6' r=ïii~!j tl:iI \ \ --".~ , -. -----~ tí'1. to::¡ / " / ¡ / / / I II~ ~ ~ ~ (j) SUPPLEMENTAL REZONING PLAN for KEAGY VILLAGE SllUATE ELECTRIC ROAD and KEAGY ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA (f) qsr I --" ilícw A CALDWELL WHITE ASSOCIATES ~.~~ "fJii,itm¡¡: "-~ :'..':1=';,"':::"':."== ~G"""'" / .~.. / .~ - ........ ........ NY . P.~ .ox -- . ........ """""" ...,. "") ......... . .~ "") .......... . .-""" ..-.........""" ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2004-05 budget SUBMITTED BY: Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget Elmer C. Hodge ~ /I~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ JØI. ~ ~ ~o.ff- . -:'(~ Æ~ .d .cÆ;f(1 ijo.>J ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The fiscal year 2004-05 budget was presented to the Board of Supervisors on April 27, 2004. A budget public hearing was held on April 27, 2004 to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed budget and FY2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program. Attached for your approval is the 2004-05 fiscal year budget appropriation ordinance. The total County budget is $309,786,992. This includes all inter-fund and intra-fund transfers. The budget net of transfers is $228,416,444. At the April 27, 2004 Board of Supervisor's meeting the County Administrator presented the proposed Roanoke County budget, which included the approved Roanoke County Schools Budget. At that time, a state budget had not been finalized and both County and School administrative staff included conservative estimates of state revenues for inclusion in the proposed budget. At long last the state has adopted a budget and the following information details the projected fiscal impact to Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools: Roanoke County Schools The final state budget included $7,832,955 in additional funds for Roanoke County Schools, an increase of $2,050,955 from the original estimate of $5,782,000. The School Board will incorporate these changes into their budget and will approve an adjusted budget at their meeting on May 26,2004. The adjusted School budget will be brought to the Board of Supervisors at the (;-1 June 8, 2004 meeting for approval. Based on discussions with School staff, it is anticipated that the adjusted Schools budget will include employee raises at 3.5%. Roanoke County Government Compensation Board Raises: Additional state revenue of $98,000 is included for raises for constitutional officers and employees. Sheriff's Department will receive a 4.8% increase and all other constitutional employees will receive 3%. Funding for these raises is effective December 1,2004. Due to the County's supplement of Comp Board salaries, these employees will receive the same raises as general County employees. Jail Per-Diem Reimbursements: Additional funds of $145,000 have been included for the reimbursement of housing state prisoners in the jail. This increase restores much of the state reductions over the last 2 years. Emerqencv Funded Positions - Jail: Additional funding of $95,940 has been allocated for 4 additional emergency funding positions in the jail due to increasing inmate population. These positions are funded for a 12 month period and are reviewed annually by the Comp Board. Based on the additional state funding for both the Schools and County, the operating transfer to schools has been reduced by $944,627. Of these funds, $804,627 has been allocated for future debt service of County capital projects and $190,000 has been allocated to increase employee raises from 3% to 3.5%, consistent with the proposed School salary increases. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The format of the appropriation ordinance conforms to the reporting basis used at year-end in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This presentation allows the same level of budget comparison as is required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for financial reporting purposes. This format will also consistently apply the appropriation on a fund basis for County Funds as has been used to appropriate School funds in the past. Staff recommends approval of the first reading of the 2004-05 fiscal year budget appropriation ordinance. Staff also recommends approval of the attached Classification Plan for fiscal year 2004-05. The second reading and resolution adopting the budget is scheduled for June 8, 2004. (;-t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 2004-05 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on April 27, 2004 concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2004-05; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on June 8, 2004, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 25, 2004, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 8, 2004, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2004, and ending June 30, 2005, for the functions and purposes indicated: County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2004-2005 Budget May 25, 2004 G-I Revenues: General Fund: General Government Comprehensive Services E-911 Maintenance Law Library VJCCCAILife Skills SB & T Building Recreation Fee Class Internal Services County Garage Total General Fund Debt Service Fund - County Capital Projects Fund Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Water Fund Beginning Balance Sewer Fund Beginning Balance School Funds: Operating Cafeteria Capital Debt Regional Alternative School Grant Textbook Total School Fund Total All Funds $ 136,228,566 5,037,171 970,000 41,735 271,669 404,273 981,694 2,974,293 346,392 $ 147,255,793 $ 3,035,130 $ 3,584,345 $ 957,700 $ 10,269,207 2,000,000 12,269,207 $ 6,359,649 2,500,000 8,859,649 $ 112,448,453 3,959,000 1,142,335 10,362,924 396,382 4,588,058 928,016 $ 133,825,168 $ 309,786,992 (;-1 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2004-2005 Budget May 25, 2004 Expenditures: General Government: General Administration Board of Supervisors County Administrator Community Relations Asst. Co. Administrators Human Resources County Attorney Economic Development Total General Administration Constitutional Officers Treasurer Commonwealth Attorney Commissioner of the Revenue Clerk of the Circuit Court Sheriffs Office Care & Confmement of Prisoners Total Constitutional Officers Judicial Administration Circuit Court General District Court Magistrate J & DR Court Court Service Unit Total Judicial Administration Management Services Real Estate Assessments Finance Public Transportation Management and Budget Procurement Services Total Management Services $ 347,485 237,425 206,787 313,073 552,399 453,433 602,226 2,712,828 $ $ 720,643 650,406 687,383 873,333 1,418,184 4,586,578 8,936,527 $ $ 197,068 40,878 1,655 13,429 857,405 1,110,435 $ $ 901,398 1,136,998 273,000 223,138 316,907 2,851,441 $ County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2004-2005 Budget May 25,2004 Public Safety Police $ 8,549,696 Fire and Rescue 8,723,425 Total Public Safety $ 17,273,121 Community Services General Services $ 289,305 Solid Waste 4,590,879 Community Development 4,051,608 Building Maintenance 1,620,726 Total Community Services $ 10,552,518 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 1,826,281 Parks and Recreation 2,497,333 Public Health 459,403 Social Services 6,213,719 Contributions-Human Service, Cultural, Tourism 430,703 Library 2,220,204 VPI Extension 94,129 Elections 272,397 Total Human Services $ 14,014,169 Non-Departmental Employee Benefits $ 2,256,237 Miscellaneous 890,000 Internal Service Charges 2,694,267 Total Non-Departmental $ 5,840,504 ç.. County of Roanoke '~I Adopted FY 2004-2005 Budget May 25, 2004 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt - General & Schools $ 10,589,136 Transfer to Capital 3,584,345 Transfer to Schools 55,071,225 Transfer to Schools - Non Recurring 0 Transfer to Schools - Dental Insurance 347,299 Transfer to Internal Services 957,700 Transfer to Comprehensive Services 2,153,000 Transfer to County Garage 134,318 Total Transfers to Other Funds $ 72,837,023 Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency 100,000 Total General Government $ 136,228,566 Comprehensive Services $ 5,037,171 E-911 Maintenance $ 970,000 Law Library $ 41,735 VJCCCNLife Skills $ 271,669 SB & T Building $ 404,273 Recreation Fee Class $ 981,694 Internal Services Management Information Systems $ 2,494,259 Communications 480,034 County Garage $ 346,392 Total Internal Services $ 3,320,685 Total General Fund $ 147,255,793 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2004-2005 Budget May 25, 2004 Debt Service Fund - County $ 3,035,130 Capital Projects Fund $ 3,584,345 Internal Services Fund - Risk Management $ 957,700 Water Fund $ IO,107,1l0 Unappropriated Balance 2,162,097 12,269,207 Sewer Fund $ 6,853,146 Unappropriated Balance 2,006,503 8,859,649 School Funds: Operating $ 112,448,453 Cafeteria 3,959,000 Capital 1,142,335 Debt 10,362,924 Regional Alternative School 396,382 Grant 4,588,058 Text Book 928,016 Total School Funds $ 133,825,168 Total All Funds $ 309,786,992 G-I G-I 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another within a fund. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 2004, are re-appropriated to the 2004-05 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 2003, and appropriations in the 2004- 05 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 2003-04 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 2004-05. 6. That all General Fund appropriations remaining unexpended at the end of the 2003-04 fiscal year not lapse but shall be re-appropriated as follows: a) 40% of these unexpended appropriations shall be transferred to the un- appropriated Capital Fund Balance; b) 60% of these unexpended appropriations shall be re-appropriated to the same department for expenditure in fiscal year 2004-05 as provided by Resolution 042396-5. 7. That Two Million Dollars from the Unappropriated Fund Balance is hereby appropriated to an Emergency Fund for unanticipated or emergency expenditures that may arise during the 2004-05 fiscal year; and money allocated to the Unappropriated Fund Balance must be appropriated by the Board of Supervisors before such money may be expended. 8. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2004. G.I G- , ~ ~ ~ 0 § ~ ~ ~ lr) ~ u ~ ~ r:â ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ð ~ N~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ \.J ~ ~ .t:.I:¡ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ u Classification Plan FY 2004 - 2005 MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM GRADE HOURLY ANNUAL HOURLY ANNUAL HOURLY ANNUAL 8 7.7992 16,222 9.6719 20,117 11.5447 24,012 9 8.1891 17,033 10.1557 21,123 12.1222 25,214 10 8.5985 17,884 10.6635 22,180 12.7283 26,474 11 9.0284 18,779 11.1966 23,288 13.3647 27,798 12 9.4799 19,718 11.7566 24,453 14.0331 29,188 13 9.9540 20,704 12.3442 25,675 14.7345 30,647 14 10.4518 21,739 12.9617 26,960 15.4714 32,180 15 10.9742 22,826 13.6095 28,307 16.2447 33,788 16 11.5230 23,967 14.2901 29,723 17.0570 35,478 17 12.0991 25,166 15.0045 31,209 17.9098 37,252 18 12.7039 26,424 15.7548 32,769 18.8056 39,115 19 13.3393 27,745 16.5424 34,408 19.7456 41,070 20 14.0062 29,132 17.3697 36,128 20.7331 43,124 21 14.7065 30,589 18.2380 37,935 21.7696 45,280 22 15.4418 32,118 19.1501 39,832 22.8583 47,545 23 16.2140 33,725 20.1077 41,824 24.0013 49,922 24 17.0247 35,411 21.1130 43,915 25.2010 52,418 25 17.8759 37,181 22.1686 46,110 26.4612 55,039 26 18.7696 39,040 23.2770 48,416 27.7843 57,791 27 19.7081 40,992 24.4409 50,837 29.1736 60,681 28 20.6935 43,042 25.6628 53,378 30.6321 63,714 29 21.7281 45,194 26.9461 56,047 32.1639 66,900 30 22.8149 47,454 28.2935 58,850 33.7720 70,245 31 23.9554 49,827 29.7081 61,792 35.4608 73,758 32 25.1532 52,318 31.1935 64,882 37.2337 77,446 33 26.4109 54,934 32.7532 68,126 39.0955 81,318 34 27.7317 57,681 34.3909 71,533 41.0502 85,384 35 29.1181 60,565 36.1104 75,109 43.1027 89,653 36 30.5739 63,593 37.9158 78,864 45.2578 94,136 37 32.1028 66,773 39.8118 82,808 47.5208 98,843 38 33.7079 70,112 41.8024 86,948 49.8967 103,785 39 35.3933 73,618 43.8923 91,295 52.3914 108,974 40 37.1629 77,298 46.0872 95,861 55.0114 114,423 41 39.0211 81,163 48.3915 100,654 57.7619 120,144 42 40.9722 85,222 50.8111 105,687 60.6500 126,152 43 43.0205 89,482 53.3515 110,971 63.6824 132,459 44 45.1716 93,956 56.0191 116,519 66.8665 139,082 '" I Classification Plan and Unclassified Schedule for employees in the service of Roanoke County for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2004, as herein set forth in the following words and figures: CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part I - Classified Positions Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 815 Custodian Nonexempt General Services 5 16,222 20,117 24.012 0 17,033 21,123 25,214 10 614 Clerk Typist Nonexempt Social Services 2 17,884 22,180 26,474 10 618 Courier Nonexempt Finance 1 17,884 22,180 26,474 10 855 Refuse Collector Nonexempt General Services 6 17,884 22,180 26,474 11 885 Utility Maintenance Worker Nonexempt Utility 4 18,779 23,288 27,798 12 608 Civil Process Clerk II Nonexempt Sheriff 1 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 673 Secretary Nonexempt Parks. Recreation & Tourism 1 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 673 Secretary Nonexempt Finance 1 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 685 Tax Clerk I Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 3 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 689 Treasurer Clerk I Nonexempt Treasurer 2 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 840 Motor Equipment Operator I Nonexempt Utility 8 19,718 24.453 29,188 12 850 Parks Maintenance Worker Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 10 19,718 24,453 29,188 12 872 Stormwater Maintenance Worker Nonexempt Community Development 2 19,718 24,453 29,188 13 600 Account Clerk Nonexempt Finance 3 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 600 Account Clerk Nonexempt Utility 1 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 621 Customer Service Representative Nonexempt Finance 4 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 621 Customer Service Representative Nonexempt General Services 2 20.704 25,675 30,647 13 621 Customer Service Representative Nonexempt Real Estate Valuation 2 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 621 Customer Service Representative Nonexempt Social Services 4 20,704 25,675 30.647 13 621 Customer Service Representative Nonexempt Utility 2 20,704 25,675 30.647 13 653 Meter Reader Nonexempt Utility 2 20,704 25,675 30.647 13 661 Police Records Clerk Nonexempt Police 3 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 732 Motor Equipment Operator II Nonexempt Utility 5 20,704 25,675 30,847 13 827 Food Service Technician Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1 20,704 25,675 30,647 13 840 Motor Equipment Operator I Nonexempt Community Development 2 20,704 25,675 30,847 13 840 Motor Equipment Operator I Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 5 20,704 25,675 30,847 14 536 Library Assistant Nonexempt Library 13 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 560 Recreation Technician Nonexempt Parks. Recreation & Tourism 1 21,739 26,960 32,180 (¡) 14 576 Social Services Aide II Nonexempt Social Services 2 21,739 26,960 32,180 I - Page 1 Grade Code Title Status Department No, Emp, Minimum Midpoint Maximum 14 604 Assistant Re9istrar Nonexempt Re9istrar 1 21,739 26,960 32.180 14 626 Deputy Clerk of Circuit Court I Nonexempt Clerk of the Circuit Court 1 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 665 Real Estate Clerk II Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 1 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 686 Tax Clerk II Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 3 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 690 Treasurer Clerk II Nonexempt Treasurer 4 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 752 Utility Line Location Technician Nonexempt Utility 2 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 776 Water Operator IV Nonexempt Utility 1 21,739 26,960 32,180 14 805 Corrections. Food Services Director ExempUCompensatory Sheriff 1 21.739 26,960 32,180 15 622 Customer Service Representative II Nonexempt Community Development 4 22.826 28,307 33.788 15 659 Payroll Clerk Nonexempt Finance 1 22.826 28.307 33,788 15 697 Warrants/Evidence Clerk Nonexempt Police 1 22,826 28.307 33,788 15 732 Motor Equipment Operator II Nonexempt Community Development 1 22.826 28.307 33,788 15 760 Wastewater Maintenance Mechanic Nonexempt Utility 1 22.826 28,307 33,788 16 358 Land Use Compliance Coordinator Nonexempt Real Estate Valuation 1 23.967 29.723 35,478 16 468 Control Room Operator Nonexempt Sheriff 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 564 Senior Library Assistant Nonexempt Library 4 23.967 29,723 35,478 16 602 Accounts Coordinator Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1 23,967 29.723 35,478 16 602 Accounts Coordinator Nonexempt Police 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 602 Accounts Coordinator Nonexempt Social Services 2 23.967 29,723 35,478 16 616 Computer Operator Nonexempt Information Technol09Y 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 643 Income Tax Coordinator Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 1 23,967 29,723 35.478 16 655 Office Support Spedalist Nonexempt Board of Supervisors 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 655 Office Support Spedalist Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 655 Office Support Specialist Nonexempt General Services 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 655 Office Support Specialist Nonexempt Human Services 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 655 Office Support Specialist Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 655 Office Support Spedalist Nonexempt Police 3 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 855 Office Support Specialist Nonexempt Utility 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Program Support Specialist Nonexempt Community Development 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Program Support Specialist Nonexempt Court Services 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Pro9ram Support Spedalist Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Pro9ram Support Specialist Nonexempt Library 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Pro9ram Support Specialist Nonexempt Finance 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 663 Program Support Specialist Nonexempt Sheriff 1 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 687 Tax Clerk III Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 G") , - Page 2 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 16 691 Treasurer Clerk III Nonexempt Treasurer 3 23.967 29.723 35,478 16 724 Laboratory Technician Nonexempt Utility 2 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 744 Solid Waste Equipment Operator Nonexempt General Services 23 23,967 29,723 35,478 16 780 Water Operator III Nonexempt Utility 5 23,967 29,723 35.478 16 810 Crew leader Nonexempt General Services 3 23,967 29,723 35,478 17 249 l~e Skills Mentoring Program Mentor ExempUCompensatory Court Services 3 25.166 31,209 37,252 17 384 Tax Compliance Deputy Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 1 25.166 31.209 37,252 17 452 Communications Officer I Nonexempt Police 6 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 620 Customer Service Coordinator Nonexempt Community Development 1 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 620 Customer Service Coordinator Nonexempt General Services 1 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 620 Customer Service Coordinator Nonexempt Social Services 1 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 627 Deputy Clerk of Circuit Court It Nonexempt Clerk of the Circuit Court 3 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 651 legal Secretary Nonexempt Commonwealth's Attorney 3 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 651 legal Secretary Nonexempt County Attorney 1 25.166 31,209 37,252 17 662 Payroll Technician Nonexempt Finance 2 25.166 31.209 37.252 17 667 Real Estate Clerk Supervisor Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 1 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 700 Automotive Mechanic Nonexempt General Services 4 25,166 31,209 37,252 17 781 Water Operator II Nonexempt Utility 2 25,166 31,209 37,252 18 333 Eligibility Worker Nonexempt Social Services 15 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 345 Equipment Technician Nonexempt General Services 2 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 454 Communications Officer II Nonexempt Police 17 26.424 32,769 39.115 18 528 Human Resources Assistant ExempUCompensatory Human Resources 3 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 558 Recreation Programmer Nonexempt Parks. Recreation & Tourism 9 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 606 Business Ordinance Inspector Nonexempt Commissioner of the Revenue 1 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 624 Deputy Assistant General Registrar Nonexempt Registrar 1 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 631 Deputy Clerk to Itle Board of Supervisors Nonexempt Board of Supervisors 1 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 632 Economic Development Administrative Assistant Nonexempt Economic Development 1 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 671 Risk Management Specialist Nonexempt Finance 1 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 704 Building Maintenance Technician Nonexempt General Services 4 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 708 Electrician Nonexempt Utility 1 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 715 Heavy Truck Mechanic Nonexempt General Services 1 26,424 32,769 39,115 18 716 laboratory Technician Supervisor Nonexempt Utility 1 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 733 Motor Equipment Operator III Nonexempt Utility 2 26.424 32,769 39,115 18 736 Senior Water Operator Nonexempt Utility 2 26.424 32,769 39,115 G\ 18 842 Parks Crew leader Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 7 26,424 32,769 39,115 Page 3 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 18 848 Parns Maintenance Service Specialist Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1 26,424 32.769 39,115 19 324 Electrical Inspector Nonexempt Community Development 1 27,745 34,408 41,070 19 336 Employment Services Worner ExempVCompensatory Social Services 1 27,745 34,408 41.070 19 343 En9ineerin9/GIS Technician I Nonexempt Community Development 2 27.745 34,408 41.070 19 348 Fraud Investi9ator Nonexempt Social Services 1 27,745 34,408 41.070 19 360 Plumbin9 and Mechanical Inspector Nonexempt Community Development 1 27.745 34,408 41.070 19 381 Senior Eli9ibility Worner Nonexempt Social Services 6 27,745 34,408 41.070 19 428 Police Community Services Officer Nonexempt Police 3 27,745 34,408 41,070 19 539 Office Budget Specialist Nonexempt Inlonnation Technology 1 27,745 34,408 41,070 19 628 Deputy Clern 01 Circuit Court III Nonexempt Clerk 01 the Circuit Court 5 27,745 34.408 41,070 19 705 Building Maintenance Technician II Nonexempt General Services 3 27,745 34,408 41,070 20 201 Assistant Cataioger ExempVCompensatory Library 1 29,132 36.128 43,124 20 202 Assistant Relerence Librarian ExempVCompensatory Library 1 29,132 36,128 43,124 20 284 Social Worker ExempVCompensatory Social Services 18 29.132 36,128 43,124 20 344 En9ineerin9/GIS Technician II Nonexempt Community Development 1 29.132 36,128 43.124 20 363 Pollution Abatement Inspector Nonexempt Utility 3 29.132 36,128 43.124 20 383 Social Services Trainer/Case Reader ExempVCompensatory Social Services 1 29,132 36,128 43,124 20 416 Firef¡ghter/EMT Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 33 29,132 36.128 43,124 20 442 Police Officer-Unilonn Division Nonexempt Police 58 29,132 36.128 43,124 20 456 Communications Officer III Nonexempt Police 5 29.132 36,128 43,124 20 470 Deputy Sheriff Nonexempt Sheriff 37 29.132 36,128 43.124 20 532 Legal Assistant Nonexempt County Attomey 1 29,132 36,128 43,124 20 588 VictirnlWitness Coordinator Nonexempt Commonwealth's Attomey 1 29,132 36,128 43,124 20 726 Lead Senior Water Operator Nonexempt Utility 2 29,132 36,128 43,124 20 820 Stonnwater Maintenance Foreman Nonexempt Community Development 2 29,132 36.128 43,124 20 845 Parns Maintenance Foreman Nonexempt Parks, Recreation & Tourism 3 29,132 36.128 43,124 20 865 Solid Waste Collection Foreman Nonexempt General Services 2 29,132 36,128 43.124 20 875 Utility Maintenance Foreman Nonexempt Utility 6 29,132 36,128 43.124 21 265 Recreation Program Supervisor ExempVCompensatory Parns, Recreation & Tourism 4 30.589 37,935 45,280 21 308 Combination Code Compliance Inspector Nonexempt Community Development 9 30,589 37,935 45,280 21 382 Senior Pollution Abatement Inspector Nonexempt Utility 1 30,589 37,935 45,280 21 408 Logistics Technician Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 1 30,589 37.935 45.280 21 426 Crime Analyst ExempVCompensatory Police 1 30,589 37,935 45,280 21 512 Buyer Nonexempt Finance 2 30.589 37,935 45,280 Ç) 21 556 Recreation Marnetin9 Specialist ExempVCompensatory Parns, Recreation & Tourism 1 30.589 37,935 45,280 Page 4 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 22 206 Associate Pianner ExempUCompensatory Community Development 3 32,118 39.832 47.545 22 207 Financial Info Systems Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Finance 1 32,118 39.832 47.545 22 280 Senior Social Worker ExempUCompensatory Social Services 7 32,118 39,832 47.545 22 292 Voiunteer Recruiter/Marketin9 Administrator ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 1 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 300 Appraiser ExempUCompensatory Real Estate Valuation 1 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 321 Development Review Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Community Development 1 32.118 39,832 47,545 22 327 Electronic Services Specialist ExempUCompensatory Library 1 32.118 39,832 47,545 22 327 Electronic Services Specialist ExempUCompensatory Social Services 1 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 346 Engineering/GIS Technicai Supervisor Nonexempt Community Development 1 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 354 Microcomputer Technician ExempUCompensatory Information Technology 2 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 378 Senior Employment Services Worker ExempUCompensatory Social Services 1 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 418 Paramedic/Firefighter Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 42 32,118 39,832 47.545 22 443 Police Officer II . Uniform Div. Nonexempt Police 12 32,118 39,832 47.545 22 446 Police-<;rime Prevention Officer Nonexempt Poiice 1 32.118 39,832 47.545 22 458 Communications Training Officer Nonexempt Police 1 32.118 39,832 47.545 22 460 Lead Communications Officer Nonexempt Police 5 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 476 Deputy Sheriff-Facility Maintenance Supervisor Nonexempt Sheriff 1 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 479 Deputy Sheriff - LIDS Technician Nonexempt Sheriff 1 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 484 Deputy Sheriff - Training Nonexempt Sheriff 1 32.118 39,832 47.545 22 489 Deputy Sheriff-Rehabilitation Nonexempt Sheriff 5 32.118 39,832 47.545 22 490 Deputy Sheriff-Librarian Nonexempt Sheriff 1 32,118 39,832 47.545 22 492 Deputy Sheriff-Medical Nonexempt Sheriff 6 32,118 39,832 47,545 22 493 Deputy Sheriff-Inmate Records Nonexempt Sheriff 1 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 629 Deputy Clerk of Circuit Court IV ExempUCompensatory Clerk of the Circu" Court 4 32,118 39.832 47,545 22 635 Executive Secretary Nonexempt County Administrator 1 32.118 39.832 47,545 22 660 Payroll Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Finance 2 32.118 39,832 47,545 22 870 Solid Waste Operations Supervisor ExempUCompensatory General Services 1 32.118 39,832 47.545 22 880 Utility Maintenance Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Utility 1 32,118 39,832 47.545 23 222 Divisional Librarian ExempUCompensatory Library 2 33,725 41.824 49,922 23 312 Communications Technician Nonexempt Information Technology 5 33,725 41.824 49,922 23 330 Eligibility Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Social Services 3 33.725 41,824 49.922 23 374 Real Estate Technology Support ExempUCompensatory Real Estate Vaiuation 1 33.725 41,824 49.922 23 376 Senior Combination Code Compliance Inspector Nonexempt Community Development 0 33,725 41,824 49.922 23 412 Fire Inspector ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 2 33,725 41,824 49,922 (ì\ 23 414 Fire Lieutenant Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 12 33,725 41.824 49,922 . - Page 5 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 23 438 Poiice Officer.Criminallnvestigator Nonexempt Police 14 33,725 41.824 49.922 23 893 Utility Billing Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Finance 1 33.725 41.824 49.922 23 714 FleeUGarage Supervisor ExempUCompensatory General Services 1 33.725 41.824 49.922 23 764 Water Distribution Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Utility 1 33.725 41.824 49.922 23 784 Water Production Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Utility 1 33.725 41,824 49.922 23 873 Stonnwater Operations Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Community Development 1 33,725 41,824 49.922 24 210 Branch Librarian ExempUCompensatOfy Library 3 35.411 43.915 52.418 24 233 Business Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 1 35,411 43.915 52,418 24 233 Business Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Social Services 1 35,411 43.915 52,418 24 247 Life Skills Mentoring Program Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Court Services 1 35,411 43.915 52.418 24 254 Par1<s Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Parks, Recreation & Tourism 3 35,411 43.915 52,418 24 263 Recreation Program Manager ExempUCompensatory Par1<s. Recreation & Tourism 4 35,411 43,915 52,418 24 351 Geographic Infonnation Systems Coordinator Nonexempt Community Development 1 35,411 43,915 52,418 24 366 Programmer ExempUCompensatory Infonnation Technology 2 35.411 43,915 52.418 24 424 Administrative Analyst ExempUCompensatory Police 1 35,411 43.915 52,418 24 444 Police - Records Unit Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Police 1 35,411 43.915 52,418 24 462 Administrative Analyst ExempUCompensatory Sheriff 1 35,411 43.915 52.418 25 140 Chief Deputy Commissioner of Revenue ExempUCompensatory Commissioner of the Revenue 1 37.181 46.110 55,039 25 144 Chief Deputy Treasurer ExempUCompensatory Treasurer 1 37,181 46,110 55,039 25 232 Financial Analyst ExempUCompensa!ory Finance 2 37.181 48.110 55.039 25 237 Budget Analyst ExempUCompensatory Budget 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 256 Planner ExempUCompensatory Community Development 2 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 266 Reference and Adult Services Coordinator ExempUCompensatory Library 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 282 Social Work Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Social Services 3 37.181 46,110 55,039 25 337 Employment Services Supervisor ExempUCompensatory Social Services 1 37,181 46.110 55.039 25 355 Network Speciaiist ExempUCompensatory Infonnation Technology 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 427 Police Officer - Sgt - Academy Asst Dir/Grants Admin ExempUCompensatory Police 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 436 Police Officer - Sgt - Professional Standards ExempUCompensatory Poiice 1 37.181 46,110 55.039 25 440 PoHce Officer - Sergeant Nonexempt Poiice 12 37.181 46,110 55,039 25 450 Chief Communications Officer ExempUCompensatory Police 1 37,181 46.110 55.039 25 466 Deputy Sheriff - Sgt. ClassificationlTreatment Nonexempt Sheriff 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 477 Deputy Sheriff - Sgt - Inmate/Jail Services Nonexempt Sheriff 1 37.181 46.110 55.039 25 478 Deputy Sheriff. Sg! - Inmate Records Nonexempt Sheriff 1 37.181 46.110 55,039 25 482 Deputy Sheriff - Sergeant Nonexempt Sheriff 10 37,181 46,110 55.039 (¡\ 25 495 Deputy Sheriff - Sgt - investigator Nonexempt Sheriff 1 37,181 46.110 55.039 I - Page 6 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 25 496 Deputy Sheriff - Sgt. Medical Nonexempt Sheriff 1 37,181 46,110 55,039 26 150 Clerk to the Board of Supervisors ExempVCompensatory Board of Supervisors 1 39,040 48,416 57,791 26 212 Budget Administrator ExempVCompensatory Budget 1 39,040 48,416 57,791 26 214 Civil Engineer I ExempVCompensatory Community Development 2 39,040 48,416 57,791 26 242 Human Resources Consultant ExempVCompensatory Human Resources 2 39.040 48,416 57,791 26 289 Tourism/Event Coordinator ExempVCompensatory Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 315 Computer Operations Supervisor ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 1 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 352 IT Project Manager ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 1 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 369 Programmer/Analyst ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 2 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 375 Senior Appraiser ExempVCompensatory Real Estate Valuation 8 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 386 Technical Services Supervisor ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 1 39,040 48,416 57,791 26 410 Fire Captain Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 8 39,040 48,416 57,791 26 411 Fire Captain - Fire Prevention Nonexempt Fire and Rescue 1 39.040 48,416 57,791 26 740 Sewer Operations Manager ExempVCompensatory Utility 1 39,040 48,416 57.791 26 772 Water Operations Manager ExempVCompensatory Utility 1 39,040 48,416 57.791 27 228 Facilities Manager ExempVCompensatory General Services 1 40,992 50.837 60,681 27 250 Network Engineer ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 2 40,992 50,837 60,681 27 286 Solid Waste Manager ExempVCompensatory General Services 1 40.992 50,837 60,681 27 310 Communications Shop Supervisor ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 1 40,992 50,837 60,681 27 432 Police Officer - Lieutenant Nonexempt Police 4 40,992 50,837 60,681 27 434 Police Officer - Lieutenant ServicesiCID Division ExempVCompensatory Police 2 40,992 50.837 60.681 27 480 Deputy Sheriff - Lieutenant ExempVCompensatory Sheriff 6 40,992 50,837 60.681 28 138 Chief Deputy Clerk of the Circuit Court ExempVCompensatory Clerk of the Circuit Court 1 43.042 53,378 63,714 28 164 Public Information Officer ExempVDiscretionary Community Relations 1 43.042 53,378 63,714 28 226 Economic Development Specialist ExempVCompensatory Economic Development 2 43,042 53,378 63,714 28 920 Registrar ExempVDiscretionary Registrar 1 43.042 53.378 63,714 29 191 Finance Manager ExempVDiscretionary Finance 1 45,194 56,047 66.900 29 195 Purchasing Manager ExempVDiscretionary Finance 1 45,194 56,047 66,900 29 216 Civil Engineer II ExempVCompensatory Community Development 2 45,194 56,047 66,900 29 216 Civil Engineer II ExempVCompensatory Utility 2 45.194 56,047 66,900 29 227 Engineer/Plans Examiner ExempVCompensatory Community Development 1 45,194 56.047 66.900 29 231 Database Administrator ExempVCompensatory Information Technology 1 45,194 56.047 66.900 29 270 Risk Manager ExempVDiscretionary Finance 1 45,194 56,047 66,900 29 291 Traffic Engineer ExempVCompensatory Community Development 1 45,194 56,047 66,900 ~ 29 293 System Analyst ExempVCompensatory Intormation Technology 4 45.194 56,047 66,900 - Page 7 Grade Code Title Status Department No, Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 29 402 Battalion Chief-Operations ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 3 45,194 56.047 66,900 29 404 Battalion Chief.Training ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 1 45,194 56,047 66,900 29 405 Battalion Chief - EMS Operations ExempUCompensatory Fire and Rescue 1 45,194 56,047 66,900 30 110 Assistant Director of General Services ExempUDiscretionary General Services 1 47.454 58,850 70,245 30 116 Assistant Director of Library Services ExempUDiscretionary Library 1 47,454 58,850 70,245 30 118 Assistant Director of Parks ExempUDiscretionary Parks. Recreation & Tourism 1 47.454 58,850 70,245 30 124 Assistant Director of Recreation ExempUDiscretionary Parks. Recreation & Tourism 1 47,454 58.850 70,245 30 132 Building Commissioner ExempUCompensatory Community Development 1 47.454 58.850 70,245 30 278 Senior Planner ExempUDiscretionary Community Development 1 47,454 58.850 70,245 30 294 Stonnwater Operations Manager ExempUCompensatory Community Development 1 47,454 58.850 70,245 31 203 Application Services Manager ExempUCompensatory Information Technology 1 49,827 61,792 73,758 31 209 Business Architect ExempUCompensatory Information Technology 1 49,827 61,792 73,758 31 388 Technical Service Manager ExempUCompensatory Information Technology 1 49,827 61,792 73,758 31 430 Police Officer - Captain ExemptlDiscretionary Police 1 49,827 61,792 73.758 31 472 Deputy Sheriff-Captain ExempUDiscretionary Sheriff 2 49.827 61,792 73,758 32 106 Assistant Director of Economic Development ExempUDiscretionary Economic Development 1 52,318 64,882 77,446 32 114 Assistant Director of Human Resources ExempUDiscretionary Human Resources 1 52,318 64.882 77,446 32 122 Assistant Director of Real Estate Valuation ExemptlDiscretionary Real Estate Valuation 1 52,318 64.882 77,446 32 126 Assistant Director of Social Services ExempUDiscretionary Social Services 1 52,318 64.882 77,446 32 215 Chief Planner ExempUDiscretionary Community Development 1 52,318 64,882 77,446 32 400 Division Chief - Support & Community Service ExempUDiscretionary Fire and Rescue 1 52,318 64,882 77.446 32 403 Division Chief - Operations ExempUDiscretionary Fire and Rescue 1 52.318 64,882 77.446 32 422 Division Chief - Administration ExemptlDiscretionary Fire and Rescue 1 52.318 64,882 77.446 33 108 Assistant Director of Finance ExemptlDiscretionary Finance 2 54,934 68.126 81,318 33 128 Assistant Director of Utility ExempUDiscretionary Utility 1 54,934 68.126 81,318 33 142 Chief Deputy Sheriff ExempUDiscretionary Sheriff 1 54,934 68,126 81,318 34 100 Assistant Chief of Police ExempUDiscretionary Police 2 57,681 71,533 85.384 34 104 Assistant Director of Community Development ExempUDiscretionary Community Development 1 57.681 71,533 85.384 34 115 Assistant Director of IT ExempUDiscretionary Information Technology 1 57.681 71,533 85,384 34 130 Budget Director ExempUDiscretionary Budget 1 57,681 71,533 85,384 34 176 Director of Library Services ExempUDiscretionary Library 1 57,681 71.533 85,384 ~ 34 184 Director of Real Estate Valuation ExempUDiscretionary Real Estate Valuation 1 57,681 71,533 85,384 I 34 274 Senior Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney ExernpUCornpensatory Commonwealth's Attorney 3 57,681 71,533 85.384 34 276 Senior Assistant County Attorney ExernpUCornpensatory County Attorney 2 57,681 71,533 85,384 35 136 Chief Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney ExernpUCornpensatory Commonwealth's Attorney 1 60.585 75,109 89,653 Page 8 Grade Code Title Status Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Maximum 36 168 Director of Finance ExempUDiscretionary Finance 1 63,593 78,864 94,136 36 170 Director of General Services ExempUDiscretionary General Services 1 63,593 78,864 94,136 36 180 Director of Parks, Recreation & Tourism ExempUDiscretionary Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1 63,593 78,864 94,136 36 186 Director of Social Services ExempUDiscretionary Social Services 1 63,593 78,864 94,136 37 146 Chief of Fire and Rescue ExempUDiscretionary Fire and Rescue 1 66,773 82,808 98,843 37 148 Chief of Police ExempUDiscretionary Police 1 66,773 82,808 98,843 37 162 Director of Community Development ExempUDiscretionary Community Development 1 66,773 82,808 98,843 37 166 Director of Economic Development ExemptlDiscretionary Economic Development 1 66,773 82,808 98,843 37 174 Director of Human Resources ExempUDiscretionary Human Resources 1 66,773 82.808 98,843 37 178 Director of Information Technology ExempUDiscretionary Information Technology 1 66.773 82.808 98,843 37 166 Director of Utility ExemptlDiscretionary Utility 1 66.773 82.808 98,843 38 145 Chief Financial Officer ExempUDiscretionary County Administrator 1 70.112 66.948 103,785 39 102 Assistant County Administrator ExempUDiscretionary Human Services/Management 2 73.618 91.295 108.974 40 0 77,298 95,861 114.423 41 154 County Attomey ExempUDiscretionary County Attomey 1 81,163 100,654 120.144 42 0 85,222 105,687 126,152 43 0 89,482 110,971 132,459 44 152 County Administrator ExempUDiscretionary County Administrator 1 93.956 116,519 139,082 Total Classified Positions 844 ~ I - Page g CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part II - Unclassified Positions Code 902 908 904 912 924 Till. Board Chairman Board Vice Chairman Number Board Member Commissioner of the Revenue 922 914 910 Treasurer Sheriff Commonwealth's Attomey Clerk of the Circuit Court Total Unclassified Positions 10 Cò - Page 10 Grade 10 Note: 17 Note: 19 Note: 19 Note: CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part III - Grant Funded and Temporary Full-Time Positions with Benefits Code 614 Title Status Nonexempt Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Social Services 1 17,884 22,180 Court Services Court Services Social Services 19 Note: 19 Note: 19 Note: 20 ~: 22 Note: 23 Note: Cierk Typist Social Services Court Services Commonwealth's Attomey Sheriff 19 25 Note: Position funded through CSA and local Funds 235 Court and Mentor Specialist ExempVCompensatory Social Services Police FinancelSocial Services 25,166 31,209 27,745 34,408 27,745 34.408 27.745 34,408 27,745 34,408 27,745 34,408 29,132 36,128 32.118 39,832 33,725 41,824 37,181 46,110 Maximum 26,474 37,252 41,070 41,070 41,070 41,070 41,070 43,124 47,545 49,922 55,039 Unclassified VJCCCA Grant for a period ending June 30, 2005. 229 Community Service/RestiMion Officer ExempVCompensatory Risk Management G'") I VJCCCA Grant lor a period ending June 30. 2005. 284 Social Worker ExempVCompensatory TANF Grantfor a period ending May 31, 2005. 284 Social Worker ExempVCompensatory Title IV-E Funds 548 Probation Officer Aide ExempVCompensatory VJCCCA Grant lor a period ending June 30, 2005. 587 Victim Witness Assistant Coordinator Nonexempt Position funded through the Department 01 Criminal Justice Services until June 30, 2005. 470 Deputy Sheriff Nonexempt Compen~on Bq~rd emergency lundedpositi2rls f<:>~9dol_one year endin!LJune 30, 2005. 217 Comprehensive Services Act Coordinator ExempVCompensatory Position funded through CSA and local Funds 438 Police Officer - Criminal Investigator Nonexempt VSTOP Grant lor a~d_encling December 31, 2004. 232 Financial Analyst ExempVCompensatory Title IV-E Funds 699 Workers Compensation Rehabilitation Worker Nonexempt Total Grant Funded and Temporary Positions Page 11 32 CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part IV - Roanoke Valley Television - Government and Educational Access Grade Code Title 16 390 Television Producer 20 204 Assislant Station Manager 26 134 Cable Television Go",t Access Coordinator Status ExempUCompensatory Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Cable Television 3 23,967 29,723 ~m 35,478 ExempUCompensatory Cable Television 29,132 36,128 43,124 ExempUCompensatory Cable Television 39.040 48,416 57,791 Total Roanoke Valley Television Positions CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part V - Roanoke Valley Greenway Project Grade 25 Code Title 272 Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator Status ExempUDiscrelionary Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Greenway Project 1 37,181 46,110 ~m 55,039 Total Roanoke Valley Greenway Project CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Part VI - Roanoke Area Libraries Grade 25 Code Title 371 RAL Automation Coordinator Status ExempUCompensatory Department No. Emp. Minimum Midpoint Library 1 37,181 46,110 Maximum 55,039 Total Roanoke Area Libraries Total Shared Positions ø I Page 12 Part I Part II Part 111 Part IV Part V Part VI CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2004 - 2005 Total Positions Classified Positions Unclassified Positions 844 10 ..E 886 Grant Funded and Temporary Fuli-Time Positions with Benefits Total County Positions Roanoke Valley Television. Govemment and Educational Access Roanoke Valley Greenway Project Roanoke Area libraries Total Roanoke Valley Television/Greenway ProjecURAL Positions Q) I Page 13 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. T.\-\O AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge t II County Administrator SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (Appointed by District) The five-year term of Kevin T. Barnes, Cave Spring Magisterial District, will expire on June 30, 2004. Mr. Barnes has been contacted and indicated that he would be willing to serve an additional five-year term. 2. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) The three-year term of Rita J. Gliniecki will expire on June 30, 2004. 3. Court Community Corrections Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) Policy Board The two-year term of Ray Lavinder will expire on June 30, 2004. 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District) The following three-year terms will expire on June 30, 2004: Jack W. Griffith, Cave Spring Magisterial District; David A. Thompson, Hollins Magisterial District; and Bobby G. Semones, Vinton Magisterial District. 5. Roanoke County Cable Television Committee :]:1-/6 The three-year term of David R. Jones, member at-large, will expire on June 30, 2004. The appointee to this committee is automatically appointed to serve on the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee. Mr. Jones has been contacted and indicated that he would be willing to serve an additional three-year term. 6. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission The following three-year terms will expire on June 30, 2004: Michael A. Wray and F. Kevin Hutchins, elected representatives. 7. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community Advisory Committee (CAC) The late Lee B. Eddy served on this committee without a term limit. The County has three representatives on this Committee and the Board is asked to appoint a citizen andlor representative of the community, business, education, health care or civic interests rather than staff members. 8. Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau The two-year term of Thomas A. "Pete" Haislip will expire on June 30, 2004. 9. Roanoke Valley Detention Commission The four-year term of John M. Chambliss, Jr. expired on June 30, 2002. At the time Mr. Chambliss was originally appointed in 1998, there were no term limits. Since that time, the Commission has established four-year terms and they have requested that Mr. Chambliss be re-appointed retroactive to June 30, 2002. This term will expire on June 30, 2006. Mr. Chambliss has been contacted and indicated that he would be willing to serve an additional term. 10. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee The three-year term of David R. Jones, member at-large, will expire on June 30, 2004. The appointee to the Roanoke County Cable Television Committee is automatically appointed to fill this vacancy. Mr. Jones has been contacted and indicated that he would be willing to serve an additional three-year term. 2 :fl-IO AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 25, 2004, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes - May 11, 2004 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) Board of Directors 3. Request to approve the naming of the Court Services Building (formerly Salem Office Supply Building) 4. Request to approve the naming of the Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center 5. Request from schools to accept and appropriate dual enrollment net revenues in the amount of $2,238.19 6. Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $1 ,000 from the Oracle International Database Competition 7. Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $2,500 from the United Way's Success by 6 Enhancement Grant for the purchase of playground mats 8. Request to approve 1999 Utility Billing bad debt write off 9. Request to appropriate $410,000 to various public assistance programs in the Department of Social Services 10. Request from the Sheriff's Office to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $5,140 for the purchase of bulletproof vests 1 :)1-/0 That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. :J-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of committee appointment to the Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) Board of Directors SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge I'/,.f County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Total Action AQainst Poverty (TAP) Board of Directors At the May 11,2004 meeting, Supervisor Flora nominated Elizabeth W. Stokes to serve an additional two-year term. This term will expire on May 5, 2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. :f-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the naming of the Court Services Building (formerly Salem Office Supply Building) SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge t¡.l County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRA~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The former Salem Office Supply Building is currently being renovated by the County for use as office space for the Sheriff's Office and the Court Services Unit, a division of Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. During this process, the building has been referred to as the Roanoke County Courthouse Annex. The building is scheduled to be finished by October 1, and as the time for occupancy nears, signs and a plaque will be ordered. Traditionally, plaques on public buildings include the official name of the building, as designated by the Board of Supervisors, and facilities are generally named after an appropriate individual or based on geographic location. In the past, the County has not named facilities after individuals who are still living. This policy was followed in naming Darrell Shell Park and the Clifford E. Craig Dam at Spring Hollow Reservoir. Most County facilities are named after their physical location or purpose, such as Green Hill Park and the Brambleton Center, which may help citizens in locating them. At a work session on May 11, 2004, the Board agreed to name the building "Roanoke County Court Services Building", since it will be occupied by two entities which serve the courts, the Sheriff and the Court Services Unit. T-3 The name needs to be formally confirmed by the Board so that staff can proceed with the appropriate signage for the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board confirm the name chosen in work session, and formally designate this facility as the "Roanoke County Court Services Building." ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 3-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the naming of the Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center SUBMITTED BY: James R. Lavinder Chief of Police APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The new Driver Training Center at Dixie Caverns will open on June 17,2004. This is a joint regional project between the Roanoke County and Roanoke City Police Departments. At a work session held on May 11, staff recommended that the center be named "The Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center" due to the abundance of Mountain Laurel at the Center and the natural beauty of the area. In addition, every effort has been made to keep the project environmentally friendly by replacing the trees cut with seedlings and planting natural mountain plants such as rhododendrons and day lilies. It was the consensus of the Board at the May 11 work session to name the center the Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center, and staff is requesting that this name now be formally confirmed. FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: None "T-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board confirm the name chosen in work session, and formally designate the center as the Laurel Mountain Police Driving Center. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. T-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to accept and appropriate dual enrollment net revenues in the amount of $2,238.19 SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange Assistant Superintendent of Instruction APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge t ¡J- County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~ ~ ....~-fd'- - - SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County schools and Virginia Western Community College (VWCC) have an agreement whereby the college provides college level courses in English, U.S. History, AP Calculus, and certain technical and science subjects. These courses are taught by Roanoke County teachers who meet the college's criteria for adjunct professors. Monies that have been collected exceed the expenses; therefore, there is a request for these additional funds to be appropriated. Roanoke County schools collected $37,400 tuition from 719 students. VWCC will reimburse $105,485.43 for services rendered (teachers, administrative expenses, rooms, utilities, and maintenance). Roanoke County schools owe VWCC $140,647.24 for tuition and technology fees and college service fees. The difference between what was collected and what was spent is $2,238.19. FISCAL IMPACT: The school budget should be increased by $2,238.19 for dual enrollment materials to be purchased from the revenues in excess of program costs. ALTERNATIVES: 3-5 None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that $2,238.19 be appropriated to the instructional program (budget code 797530-6501). ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "3 - {o AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $1,000 from the Oracle International Database Competition SUBMITTED BY: Roger W. Johnson Career and Technical Education Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ell County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A team of four students for Arnold R. Burton Technology Center placed 3rd in the Oracle Corporation's International competition. Oracle provided prizes for the students as an incentive to continue their education and training in database development. They provided $1,000 to be divided equally among the team members. FISCAL IMPACT: A check for $1 ,000 will be deposited by the school system and then paid out to the student winners in equal payments. There is no net fiscal impact on the school system. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of funds in the amount $1 ,000 from the Oracle International Database Competition. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ]"J] AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $2,500 from the United Way's Success by 6 Enhancement Grant for the purchase of playground mats SUBMITTED BY: Sharon K. Sheppard Special Education Region Coordinator and Preschool Program Coordinator Elmer C. Hodge Æ If County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S ~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools' preschool program is currently seeking accreditation through the National Association for the Education of Young Children. The United Way's Success by6 Committee is assisting in the process by offering enhancement grants to those seeking accreditation. The preschool program received $2,500 from United Way for use in purchasing playground mats. Staff is also applying for a matching grant through the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation which would also be used to purchase playground mats. FISCAL IMPACT: The school system will receive $2,500 from United Way for the purchase of playground mats. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 5-7 Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the United Way Success by 6 Enhancement Grant in the amount of $2,500 to be used to purchase playground mats for the preschool program. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J-B AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of 1999 Utility Billing bad debt write off SUBMITTED BY: Geraldine B. Barber Assistant Director of Finance - Operations APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge £(1 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATO~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The policy of writing off delinquent Utility accounts that are five years old is consistent with procedures used by the County Treasurer for write off of delinquent personal property accounts as prescribed by law. Standard utility collection procedures are: 1. sending collection letters requesting payment; 2. filing with the Department of Taxation Debt Set-Off Program; 3. filing Warrants in Debt where a valid address is available; and 4. researching DMV, VEC, and Department of Taxation records to gather information that may help secure payment from the debtor. This request is to write off 26 delinquent utility accounts for 1999 that total $4,052.21. This bad debt represents 0.0312% of the $8,303,788 Water Revenue and $4,669,992 Sewer Revenue billed in 1999. Total billing for 1999 was $12,973,780. The following comparative table shows bad debt write offs for the past five years. Utility Billing Bad Debt Write Off Comparison Number of Delinquency Year Amount Accounts Total Billina % Ava/Acct 1999 $4,052.21 26 $12,973,780.00 0.0312% $155.85 1998 $3,324.34 23 $12,880,250.00 0.0258% $144.54 1997 $5,464.32 43 $12,115,845.00 0.0451 % $127.08 1996 $6,264.59 36 $11,895,402.00 0.0527% $174.02 1995 $8,018.07 41 $11,590,4 75.00 0.0692% $195.56 J-Z FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends writing off the 1999 delinquent Utility Billing accounts. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ]""-9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate $410,000 to various public assistance programs in the Department of Social Services SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Betty R. McCrary Director of Social Services APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge t!/I County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Social Services receives additional appropriations throughout the year for public assistance and services delivery. The State has made available $300,000 in Federal IV-E funds for foster children; $40,000 adoption subsidy; and $70,000 for transitional day care. The Department of Social Services cannot access these funds until the County has appropriated the same. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appropriate $410,000 to the fiscal year 2003-2004 Social Services budget and to appropriate the related revenues from the State FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact - 100% Federal/State reimbursement funds. ALTERNATIVES: None 3-1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the appropriation of $410,000 to the fiscal year 2003-2004 Social Services budget, to be distributed as follows: $300,000 for FederallV-E (602000-5730); $40,000 for adoption subsidy (602000-5771); and $70,000 for transitional day care (602000-5749). In addition, staff recommends the appropriation of the related revenues from the State. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. :f-I() AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Sheriff's Office to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $5,140 for the purchase of bulletproof vests SUBMITTED BY: Gerald S. Holt Sheriff Elmer C. Hodge c!/r County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Sheriff's Office applied to the Bureau of Justice Assistance for funding under the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998. The grant was approved by Internet e-mail to Ms. Margaret Bacon in the Roanoke County Finance Department. This grant will allow the Sheriff's Office to purchase bulletproof vests to provide heightened protection for court bailiffs, transportation deputies, and home electronic monitoring deputies. The Sheriff's Office received an award of $2,570. This amount, when combined with the required 50% cash matching funds, will bring the total amount of the award approved by the Board to $5,140. Funds are available in the Sheriff's Office budget to provide the $2,570 match. FISCAL IMPACT: None - matching funds are available in the Sheriff's Office budget. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $2,570 and appropriation of matching funds from the Sheriff's Office budget in the amount of $2,570. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. K-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to schedule a joint work session with the Planning Commission on June 8, 2004, to discuss revisions to the Community Plan SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ¿ff County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is holding six community meetings throughout the County to gather input on the recommended revisions to the Roanoke County Community Plan. At the conclusion of those meetings, staff requests a joint work session with the Board and Planning Commission to discuss the revised Community Plan. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Schedule a joint work session with the Planning Commission on June 8 to discuss the revised Community Plan. 2. Do not schedule the joint work session on June 8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. K-Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to schedule a work session on June 22, 2004, to discuss Kahn Development (Keagy Village) SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner Elmer C. Hodge ¿11 County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This petition was heard by the Planning Commission on March 2, 2004 and was forwarded to the Board of Supervisors with a unanimous recommendation. On April 27, 2004, the petition was heard by the Board and referred back to the Planning Commission due to the revised concept plan and the intended exchange of property with an adjoining property owner. At this time, the planned exchange of property no longer seems viable. At the work session on June 22, staff will discuss alternative courses of action. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Schedule the work session on June 22. 2. Do not schedule the work session on June 22. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA % of General Amount Fund Revenues Prior Report Balance $8,977,656 6.60% Addition from 2002-03 Operations 1,483,629 Audited Balance at June 30, 2003 10,461,285 July 1, 2003 Explore Park Loan Repayment 25,000 February 10, 2004 Presidential primary for 2004 (24,180) May 11, 2004 Community Policy and Management Team funding (820,000) mandated services for youth with special needs Balance at May 25, 2004 9,642,105 7.09% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $9,642,105 $9,642,105 7.09% N-I Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2003 - 2004 General Fund Revenues $135,971,831 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $8,498,239 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge t ¡.I County Administrator N-Q CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Audited Balance at June 30, 2003 $360,172.56 Transfer from Department Savings 2002-03 274,972.00 Remaining funds from completed projects at June 30, 2003 419.66 10/28/2003 Equipment and software for electronic records management (73,057.00) system for Clerk to the Board of Supervisor's Office 10/28/2003 Reimbursement from Water Fund for debt service payments 11,000,000.00 made related to Spring Hollow Reservoir 2/10/2004 Addition to the Bent Mountain Library (28,057.00) 3/9/2004 Acquisition of Woltz Property (145,000.00) Balance at May 25, 2004 $11,389,450.22 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge êll County Administrator N-3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2003-2004 Original Budget $107,940.00 July 8, 2003 Appropriation towards Roanoke Regional Airport Alliance (8,193.00) July 22, 2003 Appropriation towards Project 50 Capital Campaign (10,000.00) July 22, 2003 Reserve towards Project 50 Capital Campaign (5,000.00) August 12, 2003 Appropriation for debris removal and stablilization (15,000.00) December 16, 2003 Appropriation for Office Support Specialist in the Clerk to (15,000.00) the Board of Supervisor's Office April 27, 2004 Appropriation for Planning and Zoning Work Session (600.00) Balance at May 25, 2004 $54,147.00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge t ¡.,.I County Administrator N-L FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund 321,772.00 FY1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,801,579) 198,421.00 FY 2001-2002 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (465,400) Savings from 2001-02 debt fund 116,594 1,651,194.00 FY 2002-2003 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (2,592,125) (592,125.00) FY 2003-2004 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (2,202,725) (202,725.00) Balance at May 25, 2004 $8,435,088.00 Reserved for Future School Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation $1,500,000.00 July 11, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater (290,000.00) FY2001-2002 Original budget appropriation 1,500,000.00 July 1, 2001 School Budgeted Start-Up Costs HVHS/Glenvar Middle (1,858,135.00) July 1, 2002 School Budgeted Start-Up Costs HVHS/Glenvar Middle (35,047.00) July 1, 2002 Transfer to Operating in original 2002-03 Budget (566,818.00) July 1, 2003 Transfer to Operating in original 2003-04 Budget (250,000.00) Balance at May 25, 2004 - Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge 8 fJ County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N-t:) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - April 2004 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge (If County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total $ $ 5,521,377.09 129,841.13 929,139.94 141,712.72 959,817.33 $ 7,410,334.36 Payments to Vendors Payroll 4/09/04 Payroll 4/23/04 Manual Checks Voids Grand Total $ 799,298.81 818,104.61 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. FINDS) P'g' N4A7AM County of Roanoke, Virginia °'" 5/11/2004 Statement of Estimated and Actna. Revenues Fo,the 10 Month Period Eoded 04130/04 VeutoDate Revenues Moothly Veu to Date Umalized asa "Ioof Fund 100 GenmlFund Budget Revenues Revenues Balanee Budget 010 Real Estate Taxes 60.047.500 2,027.739 32,119.672 27,927,828 53.49 011 Pernonal Property Taxes 24,000,000 1.477.907 1,894,480 22,105,520 7.89 012 Public Service Corp Base 2,300.000 2.533,839 233,839- 110.17 013 Penalities & Interest On Prope 580,000 20,484 376.211 203,789 64.86 014 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 170,700 9.033 99,574 71,126 58.33 020 Local Sales Tax 6.375,000 541.251 4,890,581 1,484,419 76.72 021 Consumers Utility Tax 6,609.136 745,176 5,661,131 948,005 85.66 022 Business License Tax 4,400,000 52,723 4.745,414 345,414- 107.85 023 Franchise Tax 1,315,000 695,803 619.197 52.91 024 Motor Vehicle License Fees 1,740,000 328,670 468.715 1.271.285 26.94 025 Taxes On Recordation & Wills 1.160,000 148.008 939,816 220,184 81.02 026 Utility License Tax 490,000 29,752 443,834 46,166 90.58 027 Hotel & Motel Room Taxes 683,000 75,826 463.267 219,733 67.83 028 Taxes - Prepared Foods 2,675,000 258,411 2,115.288 559,712 79.08 029 Othe, Taxes 110,000 8.091 80.773 29.227 73.43 030 Animal Control Fees 28,177 2,221 21.776 6,401 77.28 031 Land and Building Fees 273.700 31.853 289,656 15,956- 105.83 032 Permits 246,000 25.272 217,462 28,538 88.40 034 Fees 45.810 3,661 39.006 6,804 85.15 037 Clerk of Court Fees 51,928 5,607 38,642 13,285 74.42 038 Photocopy Ch..ges 48,000 227 47,773 .47 039 Fines and Forfeitures 639.400 65,271 488,448 150,952 76.39 040 Revenues from Use of Money 700.288 17,239 290,909 409,379 41.54 041 Revenues From Use of Property 6,530 1.186 9,523 2,993. 145.83 042 Ch..ges for Services 3,040.179 316,416 3,040,661 482- 100.02 048 Ch..ges for Puhlic Sevices 2,549,510 2,184,260 2,350,449 199,061 92.19 050 Reimb-Shared Programs Salem 336,000 13.532 233,858 102.142 69.60 051 Miscellaneous Revenue 46.545 8,934 108,481 61,936- 233.07 056 Recovered Costs 455,816 14,923 99,167 356,649 21.76 060 Non-Categorical Aid 195,659 2,432.386 3.246.005 3,050,346- 1.659.01 061 Shared Expenses 4.684,893 360,166 3,640.990 1,043,903 77.72 064 Welfare & Social Servies-Categ 1.548,000 182,844. 1,200,977 347.023 77.58 067 Education Aid,SIllte 6,391 40.891 34.500- 639.82 073 Other State Categorical Aid 4,219,925 251.835 3,086,331 1,133,594 73.14 080 Welf..e & Social Services 2.876.734 610.627 2,710,863 165,871 94.23 Z 086 Other Categorical Aid 1,138.577 327.533 1,043.121 95,456 91.62 I 090 Sale of Land and Buildings .00 ç 092 Other Financing Sources 17.168.283 11,080. 17,179.363 .07- N ~ ~ ~ . æ Ö ~ = = ~ ~ ~ :ë ~ ~ E ;; -< i ] = ~ ; ¡¡ ~ ~ '<I ., þ ¡;¡ = - = = ð 5 ::: ¡¡ 1 '¡j ~ .:: :¡ " i ~ ~ ~ 'õ ~ E ~ .... ~ :; ~ : ¡; ;:: . ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ :< ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ., ~ ~ J '" . '" .:¡ -g '0 .:: .. . ~ rv--{, ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~. <- ~. M " '" ¡; 00 '" '" ~ N' '" . .:: ~ ~ ê ~ ~ ¡¡ e: '" . .:: '" co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " æ ð :¡ = = ~ .~ == = ;¡ .@' = > ~ .; '0 " = = = = ¡¡ ~ .. - e = ." ~ ~ = = ð ;: ::: ~ - ,š ~ ~ :< < ~ I; ~ ~ ... I .. -ð ,:¡ .. . ~ ;; ~ .. .. .. = .¡: f'I-l, ... ~ i'I t t '" :J ;¡; g ~ ~ :1 ¡:: ~ "l !8 .. J! ~ .. ~ ~ I " ~ ~ i 1 ] 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ i ! ¡ ~ ~ FIN'62 P'go ',47,OJAM County of Roanoke, Virginia D", 5/1112004 Schedule of Expenditures, Encnmbrances and Appropriations Forthe 10 MonthreriodEDded 04/30/04 V",toD." E'l"od E'penditu", & En<omb Monthly Ou"'..dln. & En,nmh"n~ Unmumbmd ...0;.01 FDDd 100 Gen...! FUDd Bud." E'p,nditu", En<omhr,"" V",toD.t, B.I.n~ Bud." 0101 L,gislative 386.204.97 21,673.55 46,222.00 328,460.20 57.744.77 85.05 0102 General & Financial Administra 8.839,981.51 669,921.42 33.679.60 6.784.969.89 2,055,011.62 76.75 0103 Electoral Board & Officials 293,266.47 19,362.55 0.00 232,682.32 60.584.15 79.34 0100 General Government Administrat 9,519,452.95 710,957.52 79,901.60 7,346,112.41 2,173,340.54 77.17 0201 Courts 1.140,921.93 92.651.92 0.00 752,568.40 388.353.53 65.96 0202 Other Judicial Support 866,114.54 53,235.92 975.00 563.364.80 302.749.74 65.05 0200 Judicial 2,007,036.47 145,887.84 975.00 1,315,933.20 691,103.27 65.57 0301 Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont 12.523,037.21 917,659.32 177,108.56 9,137,759.88 3,385,277.33 72.97 0302 Fire and Rescue 9.677,206.49 759,561.27 160,684.42 7,551,775.54 2,125.430.95 78.04 0303 Correction & Detention 5.384,185.25 437,494.79 0.00 4,222,366.94 1.161.818.31 78.42 0304 Animal Control 370,744.47 34,723.17 7,443.00 288.004.10 82,740.37 77.68 0300 Public Safety 27,955,173.42 2,149,438.55 345,235.98 21,199,906.46 6,755,266.96 75.84 0401 General Services 365,023.83 24,485.39 0.00 284.587.00 80,436.83 77.96 0402 Refuse Disposal 5.797,182.20 351,641.31 0.00 4,517,560.10 1.279,622.10 77.93 0403 Maint Buildings & Grounds 3,260,678.3 I 253,440.87 7.311.00 2.631.630.09 629,048.22 80.71 0404 Engineeting 2,410,402.39 147,395.20 2,249.00 1,761,855.99 648.546.40 73.09 0405 Inspections 739,405.96 63,662.02 0.00 679.596.90 59,809.06 91.91 0406 Garage Complex 320,273.93 23,105.19 2.502.22 234.691.14 85,582.79 73.28 0400 Public Works 12,892,966.62 863,729.98 12,062.22 10,109,92\.22 2,783,045.40 78.41 0501 Mental Health 32,475.00 579.99 0.00 28,952.66 3,522.34 89.15 0503 Public Health 459,403.00 0.00 0.00 344,552.25 114,850.75 75.00 0504 Social Services Administrntion 3.632.791.98 264,918.81 0.00 2.831.854.91 800,937.07 77.95 0505 Comprebensive Services Act 2,703,085.00 457,703.37 0.00 2,820,448.3 I 117,363.31- 104.34 0506 Public Assistance 2.167,490.00 325,886.10 0.00 2,378.289.47 210,799.47. 109.73 0507 Institutional Care 31,523.00 0.00 0.00 32.462.66 939.66- 102.98 0508 Social Services Organizations 167,755.00 29,438.75 0.00 167,755.00 0.00 100.00 '< 0500 Healtb and Welfare 9,194,522.98 1,078,527.02 0.00 8,604,3t5.26 590,207.72 93.58 ~ FINl62 7,47,O3AM Fund 100 Cen..al Fnnd County of Roanoke, Virginia Schedule of Expenditures, Eucumbrances and Appropriations Fo, the 10 Month Period Ended 04/30/04 ,." 2 DM' SIIII'O04 Yen '0 Dole E,p,nd E'penditu,.. & En,nmb & En,umb..n" Un,n,nmbnod ","Ionr y", to Dol' B"'n" Bud." 2,656,316.30 1.1l7,132.32 70.40 1,639,707.78 518,446.56 75.98 148,410.00 59.121.00 71.51 4,444,434.08 1,694,699.88 72.40 383.535.61 291.982.65 56.78 26,958.82 62.497.18 30.14 468.919.79 90,111.41 83.88 91,010.00 1,060.00 98.85 970,424.22 445,651.24 68.53 521,691.13 48,491.86 91.50 17,323.66 17,676.34 49.50 2,110,948.80 364.716.20 85.27 426,940.06 173,059.94 71.16 55.000.00 55,000.00 50.00 857.42 58,889.58 1.44 0.00 10,437,105.00 .00 3,132,761.07 11,154,938.92 21.93 48,826,874.52 22,291.969.48 68.66 607.271.50 206,500.00 74.62 49,434,146.02 22,498,469.48 68.72 106,557,953.94 48,786,723.41 68.60 <- , () 0601 0602 0603 0701 0702 0703 0705 0801 0802 0803 0804 0806 0807 0808 0901 0902 P..ks & Recreation Librnry Cullurnl Enrichment 0600 Parks, Reneation & Cullural Planning & Zoning Cooperntive Extension Program Economic Development Contribution to Human SeNice 0700 Community Development Employee Benefits Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Miscellaneous Tax Relief/Elderly & Handicapp Refuse Credit Vinton Contingency Balance Unappropriated Balance 0800 Non-Departmental 1ntertUnd Tnmsfen; Out 1ntrafund Trnnsfen; Out 0900 T..nsfers Out G"nd Total, B.d." Monthly Exp,ndlt.'.. O."..nd;n. En,umb..n« 3,773.448.62 2,158,154.34 207,531.00 215.771.44 143.735.04 1.000.00 12,485.39 6,535.92 0.00 6,139,133.96 360,506.48 19,021.31 675,518.26 89.456.00 559,031.20 92,070.00 35,447.95 690.29 33.987.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,416,075.46 70,125.52 0.00 570,182.99 35.000.00 2,475,665.00 600.000.00 110.000.00 59.747.00 10,437,105.00 5,693.39 4,333.27 2.033,676.60 426.940.06 0.00 557.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,287,699.99 2,471,200.58 0.00 71,118.844.00 813,771.50 5,024,206.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,932,615.50 5,024,206.34 0.00 155,344,677.35 12,874,579.83 457,196.11 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER N-r¡ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of April 30, 2004. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: SUNTRUST CAP 957,153.36 CASH INVESTMENT:: ALEXANDER KEY - LlR 5,295.77 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: ALEXANDER KEY FED BRANCH BANKING & TRUST EVERGREEN MORGAN KEEGAN SUNTRUST SUNTRUST CAP 4,857.23 2,066.67 3,901.65 4,800.83 6,218.06 923,780.55 CORPORATE BONDS ALEXANDER KEY FED EVERGREEN 5,481.75 3,213,306.75 GOVERNMENT: ALEXANDER KEY FED ALEXANDER KEY - Sub Acct EVERGREEN SUNTRUST-CAP 10,995,630.00 4,334,164.30 7,177,957.99 10,211,214.02 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION (G.O.) 6,083,879.25 05/13/04 1 of 2 957,153.36 5,295.77 100,000.00 945,624.99 3,218,788.50 32,718,966.31 6,083,879.25 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER (V-'l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasure~s Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of April 30, 2004. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: MONEY MARKET: ALEXANDER KEY FED EVERGREEN ALEXANDER KEY - Sub Acct SUNTRUST-CAP SUNTRUST - SWEEP WACHOVIA 9,651,930.46 0.07 28,029.05 3,074,274.47 4,878,386.22 2,309,388.05 19,942,008.32 REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: EVERGREEN TOTAL 1,652,988.00 1,652,988.00 65,624,704.50 05/13/04 2 of2 (V-g COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA PHILIP A. SHUCET COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219-2000 May7,2004 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the Director of the Local Assistance Division in April 2004. All changes to the Secondary System, with the exception of legal discontinuances, are effective the day they are approved by the Director of the Local Assistance Division. This date appears in the far right column of the monthly report. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 804-786-7399. Michael Estes 1111. ~ ~ 17 / rZ'$- Director, Local Assistance Division ME/Mil VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Report of Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways 07-May-O4 15 County of Roanoke Street Names grouped by Project/Subdivision Ronte Street Termini Lengtb Date BOS Miles Resolution Effective System Change: Addition Brookfield, Sections 1,4 Valley Stream Drive 01265 From: Sw Intersection OfRollte 1267 Cedarmeade Dr. To: Nw Intersection OfRollte 1267 Cedarmeade Dr. From: Nw Intersection Of Rte 1267 Cedarmeade Dr. To: CllI De Sac 0.17 12116/2003 4/2312004 Valley Stream Drive 01265 0.08 12116/2003 4/23/2004 Total Net Change in Mileage 0.25 --- ---. This document summarizes implemented changes in the secondary system olstate highways that will be reported to the Commonwealth Transportation Board on May 20,2004 "< \ 00 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss financing of the Public Safety Building SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge I'N County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: We recently reviewed our capital program with our financial advisor, Jim Johnson, of Morgan Keegan. Jim has worked with the County for over 14 years, advising us on bond sales beginning with the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. Most recently, Jim helped us structure our water revenue bond refinancing in such a way, that we were able to eliminate the need for much of the reserves, thus allowing us to transfer $11 million to the General Fund, which is now available for capital. Jim feels strongly that the interest rates will continue to increase over the next six to twelve month period, and that we should get our project to the bond market as quickly as possible. He also advises that the County use the $11 million available cash to fund the equipment portion of the Public Safety Center Project, and borrow the entire amount of the building portion. The equipment would have to be amortized over a shorter life, and the interest rates on equipment are usually not as favorable as on buildings. Staff concurs with Jim's recommendations. We learned last week that the Virginia Resources Authority (VRA) is very interested in having us participate in their Spring 2004 pool sale to fund the Public Safety Center, even though we are still piecing together the specifics of the project. We have worked with VRA in the past, including the recent refinancing of the water revenue bonds. Issuing bonds through the VRA Pool offers many advantages, such as no debt service reserve fund, and --P-I the sharing of issuance costs with the other localities in the pool. The Spring Pool sale has the following schedule: June 8 VRA Board of Directors Meeting (potential approval of County application Preliminary Official Statement Mailing Date June 9 June 15/16 Bond pricing June 30 Closing With the current interest rate climate, it is worth trying to make this bond sale. Interest rates are on the rise, and most analysts believe that interest rates will continue to increase in the near future. A 75 basis point increase in rates (+0.75%) would cause an increase of $190,000 in annual debt payments. The next VRA pool sale will price and sell in December 2004. We could sell as a stand-alone issue before then, but we will need to be much more specific in the scope of the project to sell as an individual issue, and it may be several months before we have the needed information. In order to participate, the Board would need to approve the borrowing at the June 8, 2004 meeting. Proposals are due from the vendors on June 1, so we will know if our project is in the range we were expecting, as the proposals will include "not to exceed" cost estimates. The Board will need to be comfortable approving the project and the borrowing, although the specifics of which vendor and the negotiations of the project can be finalized at a later time. With this acceleration of the borrowing of funds for the Public Safety Center, we will need to make interest-only debt payments in 2004-05, and begin payments of principal and interest in 2005-06. The $804,627 additional budget monies can be put toward the 2004- 05 interest payment, along with the $400,000 additional rescue transport fee revenues in that year. We will provide you with additional information, and answer any questions that you may have, at the work session. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. p-6) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss proffers for the Slate Hill project, 4486 Summit Street, Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner ElmerC. Hodge ¿f!+ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: øf,., '" ~-...ýl ~-?~ ~ c-~ ~ ~ ~ -... .u ~ .A.JI~ . ~ ?Jo7~' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to review the proffers submitted by the petitioner for the above-referenced rezoning request. A copy of the proffers is attached. In te gra r- ----- "'--1 1-"~II'i'",(r', r~., f,i'\\,¡/i,:" ',"! ls-;~irì'l ,I" ,\\ liD r--------,----"'--""III',' , " I I, :1((1 MAY 202004 ¡lUll e~==~~~_---_JlWr ?-~ ~ Your Investment Partner. May 20,2004 Ms. Diane Childers, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms, Childers: Delivered herewith at 11 :45 a.m. on May 20, 2004, is a document with the proffers being offered for the Slate Hill project in Roanoke County. Also attached please find a letter from Michael R. Circeo, P. E, together with the geo-technical analysis prepared by Circeo Geotech and a letter from Gene Cress of Mattern & Mattern pertaining to the traffic study. These are being delivered today in order to be distributed with the Board packets. The landowner will continue to work with County Staff for further refinements, as necessary, in order for a submittal copy to be delivered on Tuesday morning, May 25, 2004, for the Board of Supervisors meeting. Respectfully, ~ Hunter Smith HS/pj Enclosures cc: Janet Scheid, Chief Planner Ed Natt, Esquire 4415 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD, S,W" SUITE 303, ROANOKE, VA 24014 Phone: (540) 772-5090 I Fax: (540) 772-0106 E.mail: hsmith@integrallc,com ?-~ PROFFERS REVISED May 20, 2004 Hand delivered to Ms. Scheid & Ms. Childers 11:45 on 20th Address of Subj ect Property: 4486 Summit Street Roanoke, VA 24014 Tax Map No.: 077.20-01-03 077.20-01-04 077.20-01-52 077.20-01-54 077.20-01-55 087.08-03-11 Applicant's/Owner's Name: Slate Hill I, LLC Slate Hill II, LLC WoodcliffInvestments, LLC The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with the rezoning request: 1. Uses a. The C-2 uses set forth on the attached Exhibit A would be prohibited. 2. Slopes a. A geo-technical report from a certified geo-technical engineer shall be required to verify slope stability and stabilization methods, and design values for retaining structures. 3. Buildings a. Height: Building height shall not exceed 50 feet (as measured per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance) unless underground parking is provided Then building height shall not exceed 65 feet, except in Zone 3 where the height shall not exceed 75 feet. b. Size: No retail building base floor area shall exceed 90,000 square feet. No office building base floor area shall exceed 18,000 square feet. Building area shall be calculated as indicated by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. c. Materials: Acceptable building finishes include brick, wood, vinyl or composite wood substitute, glass, stucco or exterior insulated finish system (EIFS), split-face colored concrete block, stone or cast stone. 'P"~ Structures constructed in Zones 1, 2, and 3 will be similar in appearance, materials and design. d. Roofs: Rooflines of the buildings predominantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall be articulated. Acceptable roof materials include standing seam metal, copper, composite slate tile or shingles. e. Building Colors: The predominant building colors shall be tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick, natural stone. f. Facades: The facades of buildings predominantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall have vertical plane relief. 4. Road a. Curbing shall be required throughout the entire road system. The curb and gutter configuration shall be standard VDOT designs for appropriate conditions. b. The roads shall be in the approximate location as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated January 20,2004, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit B. In the event VDOT does not grant pennission to construct a portion ofthe road on the VDOT property as shown on said plan, the approximate road location shall be as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated December 11, 2003, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit C. c. All parking and vehicular circulation surfaces shall have asphalt top. Base and underlayment shall be as detennined by recommendations from geo- technical engineer. d. Roadway widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet from base of curb to base of curb. Maximum road grade shall be 16%. There shall be no on-street parking allowed. e. Minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks shall be installed on at least one side of all internal streets to provide access between buildings in Zone 2. 5. Access a. Petitioner shall make all necessary improvements to Electric Road (Route 419), Valley Avenue and Franklin Road (Route 220) as required by the traffic impact study and by VDOT. 6. Ridgeline a. No building height shall extend beyond the 1394 elevation mark and all building elevations shall be shown on the site plan. 7. Utilities a. All utilities shall be underground from the point of the utility transfonner to the interior of the site. b. Where design parameters allow, all utilities shall share a common trench. 1=>-~ 8. Retaining Walls a. Height: Maximum of IS feet. b. Distance in between walls: Minimum of 4 feet. c. Color and Texture: Tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick, natural stone. Walls shall be textured. d. Landscaping: One medium sized (5-10 feet @ maturity) shrub for every 12 feet oflinear wall. Shrubs shall be a mix of deciduous and evergreen. Shrubs may be grouped together. Landscaping behind retaining walls shall be as indicated by engineering designs for the walls. e. A Professional Engineer shall design all retaining walls. 9. Landscaping a. Trees shall be planted along the private entrance road every 30 feet, minimum 2 1/2- inch caliper, 50% native species. Flowering species that are street and urban conditions tolerant shall be utilized. 10. Site Lighting a. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 22 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, shall be down-lit or shielded so as not to directly glare onto adjoining streets or properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or properties shall not exceed 0.5-foot candles. b. All street lighting shall be designed to complement the architecture of the adjacent buildings. II. Signage a. No more than three (3) business signs shall be permitted for each business. b. Restricted signs: The following signs shall be prohibited: Off-premise signs, portable signs, temporary signs. c. Signage shall complement the buildings' architectural style. Colors shall be in the range acceptable for buildings. d. All freestanding signs shall be monument type, shall not exceed 10 feet in height or 12 feet in width and signs shall be channel lit, ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or adjoining properties. e. All signs shall be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. f. One marquee sign shall be allowed on the Route 220 side of the development. The height of the marquee sign shall be limited to 40 feet. 12. Parking a. No gravel parking areas shall be allowed. All parking in excess of Roanoke County standards shall be constructed of materials as recommended by the geo-technical engineer. T-~ 13. Stonn Water Management a. Outfalls shall be through level spreaders and have a 25-foot riparian buffer as a separation between the discharge point and the concrete culvert. Other design options may be employed if approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department and VDOT. b. Detention Requirements: la-year post development equal to or less than 2-year pre-development and 25-year post equal to or less than 2-year pre- development. Applicant/Owner: SLATE HILL I, LLC By !~ Hunter Smith, Manager SLATE HILL II, LLC By !~ Hunter Smith, Manager WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC By ~ Hunter Smith, Manager q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-\ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to students at Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkilisUSA Vocational Industrial Clubs of America, Inc. (VICA) awards Elmer C. Hodge t ~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~..;.. ø.. A... .~ ~ d -.-' ~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: SkilisUSA-VICA is a student organization comprised of more than 260,000 high school and college students and professional members who are enrolled in training programs in technical, skilled and service occupations. At the state competition held in April 2004, there were 14 gold medal recipients who received awards in the following ten categories: Community Service, Cosmetology, Customer Service, Extemporaneous Speaking, Extemporaneous Writing, Outstanding Chapter, Promotional Bulletin Board, Residential Wiring, State Web Page Design, and Technical Computer Applications. These students were recognized by the School Board at their May 13, 2004, meeting. We regret that School Superintendent Dr. Weber, and Roger Johnson, Career and Technical Education Administrator, are unable to attend this recognition due to their attendance at the school's retirement dinner being held tonight. Ben Helmandollar, Associate Career and Technical Education Administrator, and Joan Farley, Sponsor of the SkilisUSA-VICA Club, will accept the resolution on behalf of the students. ì {j I f\- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CLUBS OF AMERICAN, INC. (VICA) STUDENTS AT A. R. BURTON TECHNOLOGY CENTER FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA SkillsUSA VICA AWARDS WHEREAS, SkilisUSA-VICA is the second largest student organization in the nation, serving more than 260,000 high school and college students and professional members who are enrolled in training programs in technical, skilled and service occupations; and WHEREAS, there are approximately 13,000 VICA members from 203 schools in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, several students from A. R. Burton Technology Center, having achieved first place in local and district level competitions, won gold medals at the Virginia SkilisUSA-VICA state competition held in April, 2004; and WHEREAS, the following awards were received: . Community Service: Jamie Moran and Jessi Mvers. William Byrd HiQh School. Awarded to the school which completes the most thorough and successful community service activity. . CosmetoloQY: Elaine Baldacci, Qraduate of Cave SDrinQ HiQh School. Awarded to the student who demonstrates outstanding ability in all aspects of hair styling and hair cutting. . Customer Service: Rose Parker, William Bvrd HiQh School. Awarded to the student who best addresses simulated customer service scenarios. . ExtemDoraneous SDeakinQ: Jacklvn Howell. Northside HiQh School. Awarded to the student who best develops and delivers a speech on a topic they are given five minutes prior to the time at which they must deliver the speech. . ExtemDoraneous Writina: SteDhen Berrv. Hidden Valley HiQh School. Awarded to the student who best develops a 250-500 word essay on a topic given when they enter the contest room. . OutstandinQ ChaDter: Kristy Allen. Hidden Valley HiQh School. Judy Buzzo, William Byrd Hiah School. and Summer Gladden, Glenvar HiQh School. Awarded to the school in Virginia which has the most successful and thorough SkilisUSA program. . Promotional Bulletin Board: JoseDh Martin, Glenyar HiQh School and Jeremy Mitchell. Northside HiQh School. Awarded to the student designed and constructed bulletin board that does the best job of promoting Career and Technical Education and SkilisUSA-VICA. . Residential Wirina: Steven Tribbett, Qraduate of William Byrd HiQh School. Awarded to the student who best demonstrates the ability to complete a comprehensive residential wiring project. . State Web PaQe DesiQn: Hillarv VanderQrift, Blue RidQe Technical Academy. Awarded to the student who develops the best web page for the state Skills USA organization. . Technical ComDuter ADDlications: Tucker StaDleton. Qraduate of Cave SDrina HiQh School. Awarded to the student who best demonstrates the ability to install, troubleshoot, and repair computer operating systems and applications software. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the students at A. R. Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkilisUSA-VICA awards; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to each of the students in all of their future endeavors. 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. p,-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to the William Byrd High School Girls Swim Team for winning the Group AA State Championship in the 400-meter freestyle relay APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The William Byrd High School Girls Swim Team won the Group AA State Championship in the 400-meter freestyle relay on February 14, 2004, at Radford University's Dedmon Center. The team is comprised of Clare Wooddall-Gainey, Kyndal Spradlin, Erin Tudor and Kristen Escobar. The team's combined time was 3:41.22 which broke the meet record of 3:41.29 set by William Byrd in 2003. In addition to the team members, Coaches Doug Fonder and Melanie Fisher are expected to attend. Principal Richard Turner and School Superintendent Linda Weber are unable to attend due to prior commitments. £-:¿- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2004 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SWIM TEAM FOR WINNING THE GROUP AA STATE CHAMPIONSHIP IN THE 400-METER FREESTYLE RELAY WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Swim Team won the Group AA State 400-Meter Freestyle Relay on February 14, 2004, at Radford University's Dedmon Center; and WHEREAS, the team won the event in 3:41.22 which broke the meet record of 3:41.29 set by William Byrd High School in 2003; and WHEREAS, the team is comprised of Clare Wooddall-Gainey, Kyndal Spradlin, Erin Tudor and Kristen Escobar and is coached by Doug Fonder and Melanie Fisher. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SWIM TEAM for their athletic ability, their commitment, and their team spirit; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-:3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Certificate of recognition to Kelly Clark for winning the Group A State Championship in Girls' Cross Country APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Kelly Clark, a sophomore at Glenvar High School (GHS), won the Group A State Championship in Girls' Cross Country on the 5-kilometer course on Saturday, November 8, 2003. Principal Curtis Hicks and School Superintendent Linda Weber are unable to attend this meeting due to prior commitments. Ms. Clark and members of her family will be present to accept the certificate of recognition. Also present will be Mr. Jamie Soltis, Track Coach. ~untP of l\omto~ P-3 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Kell.y Clark for winning the Group A State Championship in Girls' Cross Country ~ Kelly Clark, a sophomore at Glenvar High School, won the Group A State Championship in Girls Cross Country on the 5-kilometer course on November 8, 2003. ~ Ms. Clark demonstrated outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season. ~ Ms. Clark's accomplishments include the following: . Winning the Group A State Championship in the Girls' 1600 Meter Run . Winning the District and Regional Championships in the 1600 and 800 meters ~ The Board of Supervisors congratulates Ms. Clark upon her athletic achievements and expresses its best wishes for success in her future endeavors at Glenvar High School. Presented this 25th day of May, 2004 ~,ù...S> '- ~_.... Richard C. Flora, Chairman Îh~ Î~. ~ Michael W. Altizer, Vice-C airman ~~Q.W Michael A. Wray ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Certificates of recognition to the following All-State Band and Chorus winners: (a) Joe Pirro, Hidden Valley High School (b) Sarah Armstrong, Glenvar High School (c) Prachi Sharma, Glenvar High School (d) Amy Minnix, William Byrd High School SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Certificates of recognition will be presented to those students who were selected for the Virginia All-State Band and Chorus. Expected to attend the meeting are Joe Pirro, Hidden Valley High School; Sarah Armstrong, Glenvar High School; Prachi Sharma, Glenvar High School; Barry Tucker, Band Director, Hidden Valley High School; and Kristi Vernon, Music Director, Glenvar High School. Amy Minnix and Patricia Clevenger, Music Director, William Byrd High School, have informed us that they are unable to attend the meeting. School Superintendent Linda Weber and Principals Richard Turner, Curtis Hicks, and David Blevins are unable to attend due to prior commitments. (Þunt!' of Jaoano~ ~-~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Joe Pirro Hidden Valley High School For bejng selected for the All-State Band ~ Joe Pirro, a Senior at Hidden Valley High School, plays the bass clarinet and was selected to play in the 2004 Virginia All-State Band held on April 3, 2004, at Blacksburg High School. ~ Students for the Virginia All-State Band are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to pertonn prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. ~ The Board of Supervisors congratulates Joe Pirro for being selected for the Virginia All-State Band and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. Presented this 25th day of May, 2004 ~,ò...J) (. ~-""- Richard C. Flora, Chainnan ~~Î~'~ Michae . Itlzer, Vice-C ainnan J:£; ~ oseph P. McNamara n¡ B. .Mct..'(IJJJA~ ~ "'\Yì~ Q,W Michael A. Wray ~ <to- of l\omrokts ((-If CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Sarah Armstrong Glenvar High School For being selected for the All-State Choms » Sarah Armstrong, a Junior at Glenvar High School, was selected to participate in the 2004 Virginia All-State Chorus held on April 24, 2004, at Mills Godwin High School in Richmond, Virginia. » Students for the Virginia All-State Chorus are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. » The Board of Supervisors congratulates Sarah Armstrong for being selected for the Virginia All-State Chorus and extends its best wishes to her in all of her future endeavors. Presented this 25th day of May, 2004 ~,ò...S> c. ~_.... Richard C. Flora, Chairman Ih~Î¿'~ Michael. Aitizer, Vice-C airman ~~Q.W Michael A. Wray ~ ~ of l\oano~ ((-8 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Prachi S,harma Glenvar High School For being selected for the All-State Choms .. Prachi Shanna, a Senior at Glenvar High School, was selected to participate in the 2004 Virginia All-State Chorus held on April 24, 2004, at Mill Godwin High School in Richmond, Virginia. .. Students for the Virginia All-State Chorus are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to parfonn prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. .. The Board of Supervisors congratulates Prachi Shanna for being selected for the Virginia All-State Chorus and extends its best wishes to her in all of her future endeavors. Presented this 25th day of May, 2004 ~ , ò.. ...s:> (. ~ "'" ... Richard C. Flora, Chainnan Îhuk¿ 71. ~ Michael W. Attizer, Vice-C ainnan ~~ Oosep . McNamara nAol ß. "Aid t(J1md-; ~ ""\Yì~ Q. W Michael A. Wray ~ ",,- of l\oano~ f.-~J CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Am\j Mh1MtX WHH~," Ø,....b HiSI1 Sc11oo1 For being selected for the AIl-State Chorus ~ Amy Minnix, a Senior at William Byrd High School, was selected to participate in the 2004 Virginia All-State Chorus held on April 24, 2004, at Mills Godwin High School in Richmond, Virginia. ~ Students for the Virginia All-State Chorus are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. ~ The Board of Supervisors congratulates Amy Minnix for being selected for the Virginia Ail- State Chorus and extends its best wishes to her in all of her future endeavors. Presented this 25th day of May, 2004 ~\ù,.....9 Co ~_... Richard C. Flora, Chairman Îh~ í{. ~ Michael W. Altizer, Vice-C airman "'\Yì~ a. W Michael A. Wray ~ 5-1 PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Balzer & Associates 12.5/2004 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 1, 2004 (Continued from May 4, 2004) June 22, 2004 (Continued from May 25, 2004) A. REQUEST The petition of Balzer & Associates, Inc. to rezone 4.83 acres from 11C Industrial District with Conditions to R1 Low Density Residential District for a development of single family housing located at Tract B1-A-2 of Mason Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. (Continued at the request of the petitioner) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION D. CONDITIONS E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE G. ATTACHMENTS: - Concept Plan - Staff Report - Vicinity Map - Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission B5/B4/2BB4 BB: B3 54B772BB5B BALZER AND ASSOC ROA PAGE Bl/Bl s- ) BALZER . "<eLECT"'O TOMOÞeCW Job Number:, RO400053.00 Re: McGhee Rezoning Facsimile Cover Sheet Da1e: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: To: Chris Lowe Company: Roanoke County Fax Number: 772-2108 This transmittal is from: Sean Horne Number of Pages (including cover sheet): ¡g¡ Urgent ¡g¡ For Review 0 Please Comment IF THERE IS A PROBLEM IN TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL. . MESSAGE: Chris. Due to the recent discovery of recorded deed restrictions on tax parcel 028.13-01-27.05 (tract 81-A-2 of Mason Subdivision). the owner is requesting a continuance of the rezoning case scheduled to be heard tonight at the planning commission meeting. The requested continuance is for 30 days so the deed restrictions can be worked out. Please call me with any questions. That You ) ,/t.A Sean Horne, C.L.A _..- PLANNERS' ARCHITECTS' ENGINEERS' SURVEYORS ROANOKE, i</CHMOND . NEW RIVER VALLEY' SHENANDOAH VALLEY 1208 Corooro~e Circle' Roanoke. Virginia 24018 . 1540) 772.9580' FAX 1540) 772.8050 . .....~_,...r. Petitioner: STAFFRÊPORT. Chad McGhee C/O Balzer & Associates Roanoke, VA 24018 Request: Rezoning from I-IC to R-l Location: Hollins Road Tract BI-A-2 of Mason Subdivision Magisterial District: Proffers: Hollins EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request to rezone 4.83 acres from I-IC to R-l at the 5,000 block of Hollins Road for a 16 lot single family residential subdivision. The property is designated Principal Industrial in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. Principal Industrial is defined in the 1998 Community Plan as a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. The proposed petition would not fall under any of the land use type designations of Principal Industrial but would fall under the Neighborhood Conservation designation which adjoins the property. The petitioner requests to rezone the entire tract. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site Plan Review Building Permit for Single Family Home Required. V DOT Entrance Approval Required. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - The property is currently zoned II Conditional. In March 1983, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors rezoned this tract as part of the Mountain View Farm Technological Park. The 40+ acre Mountain View Farm property was originally owned by the Roanoke County School Board, and later owned by the Board of Supervisors. In 1983, the Board of Supervisors petitioned to rezone the property for industrial development. During the conceptual design phase of the project, an extensive list of protective covenants were written to control the land use of the property as well as impacts to the surrounding neighborhoods. Many of the restrictive covenants are similar to proffered conditions typically accepted by the Board of Supervisors. The restrictive covenants were referenced in condition # I of the Board of Supervisors proffered conditions. The restrictive covenants will remain whether or not the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone S I the property. Typically, the County of Roanoke does not enforce private restrictive covenants. . But in this case, the covenants were declared by the Board of Supervisors, and the Board would need to be involved in amending the covenants, if the property were rezoned. The Planning Commission's decision for this petition is whether or not to recommend amending the zoning district for the petitioner's property. Ifa favorable recommendation is forwarded to the Board of Supervisors, the Planning Commission may wish to recommend that the Board of Supervisors amend the restrictive covenants, or simply leave the issue as matter for the Board to consider in the future. TopographvN egetation - The property increases in slope from front to back at a slope of approximately 1 to 2%. The property has an existing stonnwater management pond on the southeast comer of the property. This stonnwater management pond will need to be reconfigured to allow detention of the proposed subdivision and existing development. A mutual stonnwater management agreement will be required for the existing and proposed development. According to topography maps there are existing sinkholes on the property and the site is in an area of shrink swell soils. A geotechnical report will be needed to properly site and construct buildings and infrastructure. The use of sinkholes for drainage outfalls is prohibited. Surrounding Neighborhood - This property adjoins an R-l zoned property to the west which is owned by Roanoke County and utilized as a park. R-l single family homes continue north. The proposed property is the fITst property not zoned R-l coming from the north. Access to the park runs along the northern property line of the proposed subdivision and the park adjoins the western property line. Single family homes are also prevalent to the west with single family homes along Quail PI. and Meadwood Dr. The southern property line adjoins the Depaul Family Services property which is zoned 1-1. To the east of the property is Hollins Road, with 1-1 and R-3 properties across the road. Roanoke County also owns a 500' long by 10' wide strip of property between the proposed subdivision and Hollins Road. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Background - The petitioners conceptual plans show a subdivision consisting of 16 lots ranging from 8,000 - 14,000 square feet. Currently the lot is vacant. he conceptual plan shows a main arterial drive with lots placed along this road ending with a cul-de-sac at the rear of the property. No architecture plans have been submitted. Access/Traffic Circulation - V DOT notes that Roanoke County owns a 10' x 500' parcel which separates the proposed property from the state right of way. Access easements may need to be obtained from Roanoke County. V DOT states that the development of this single-family residential subdivision will generate approximately 160 vehicles per day. V DOT also notes that the existing stonnwater management pond will need to be modified and calculations submitted during site plan review. A commercial entrance pennit will be required upon receipt and approval of subdivision plans. This review will address access improvements. Roanoke County Traffic Engineer - Mr. Ford notes that the proposed rezoning falls just outside the limits of the V DOT project that is currently on Roanoke County's Six-Year Plan and should not be impacted by the current project. 2 $'-1 Fire & RescuefUtilities -Fire and rescue services will continue, as they currently exist. Response time to the site is estimated at 6-8 minutes. Public water and sanitary sewer is currently available. This petition does not affect the existing public water and sanitary sewer systems. Department of Economic Development - "The Department of Economic usually opposes the loss of industrial land due to rezoning, however we do not object to the proposed rezoning by Balzer & Associates of certain property located on Hollins Road. We feel that since said property is located along a transition area between industrial and residential land uses, and that the Hollins Road Corridor is currently mixed with industriàl and residential uses, moving the zoning line a few hundred feet is not significant. The Department does feel however, that the best use for the referenced property is not single family residences, but for the expansion of the adjacent county park. Park land used for athletic fields is in short supply in this geographic section ofthe county." Roanoke Parks and Recreation - The Department of Parks and Recreation have several concerns with this rezoning. Currently a project oflighting the adjacent soccer fields is in progress and there is a fear that the lighting may cause resentment from proposed residents and that they would push for lighting restrictions. It is a fairly small park and the activity, traffic, parking, and other nuances from this type of use may also cause a conflict with proposed neighbors. An industrial neighbor may not be impacted by these nuances. There is also a concern with the offset of the two entrances and a fear that this could be a safety problem, but this will be addressed by V DOT during site plan review. Long-Range Impacts - Cumulative long-range impacts of this proposed subdivision as well as others, include impacts on school populations and attendance zones, road improvements, parks and recreation facilities, emergency services and other general services such as trash collection and libraries. The school administration has recently dealt, at least in the short-run, with overcrowding in some of their attendance zones. The schools who would get the children trom the proposed development are Mountain View Elementary, Northside Middle, and Northside High. There is the recognition on the part of staff that continued residential growth has a direct impact on school capacities and other capital improvement needs such as roads and park facilities. These capital improvement needs must be met in order to maintain a high quality of life in Roanoke County. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The site is designated as Principal Industrial in the 1998 Community Plan but is adjoined by Neighborhood Conservation to the north, west, and east property lines. Principal Industrial is defined in the 1998 Community Plan as a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. The proposed petition would not fall under any of the land use type designations of Principal Industrial but would fall under the Neighborhood Conservation designation which adjoins the property. This would include single-family developments in conventional lots, which include attached, detached, and zero lot line housing options. This petition is not consistent with the 3 Principal Industrial designation of the Roanoke County Community ~lan, but considering that th?-I Neighborhood Conservation designation surrounds 3 of the 4 property lines of the proposed project, it would be prudent to consider that the proposed project would not change the land use pattern of this area and could possibly be included in the Neighborhood Conservation Designation in any future revisions of the Roanoke County Community Plan. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request to obtain a rezoning from I-IC to R-l. The request involves a 4.83 acre tract off of Hollins Road. The petitioner's request is not consistent with the policies and guidelines of the Principal Land Use designation but would not change the land use pattern of this area. The site has ample space to conform to all applicable development standards. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: 12-5/2004 Chris Lowe PC: May 4, 2004 BOS: May 25, 2004 4 . County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning ,Ç-I For Staff Use OnI 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ¡If Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance Applicants name/address wlzip C tl...t> t\1 ~G:.\IG" ~.,.. IIÞ? &dL L...",e 13.. va..""'~ ,,~~oc:.""'£'sl..::. I~ ~P"""" r-e CA. ~ú . L,f' /I~ Ie. c! V III' OF- 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Phone: :g1r¡.-~7a"l Work: Cell #: Fax No.: l'6~ê\\\"N D. M,..so"'¡ p.o. i3c>,. (,,335 ~.....c~ Y14 '2<1017 Proposed Zoning: ¡Z-I Proposed Land Use: é~'Dê:1-J7P'Ic. Does the parcel meet the Ìoioimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yesjii!. No D IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED F1RST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes D Owner's name/addreSs w/zip Property Location ¡.bl,...~ (2.0 ~ ~\-"-'L "",ç. MI4Sð¡,J 'S...:.\odill,ClfI'o"J Tax Map NO.:,e: '0 -'Z7.0S-CO Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~ Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Magisterial District: tI ...11 IN Community Plaooing area: I-f.r.(/ 'N~ Existing Zoning: NT Yes D NoD NoJe Variance/Waiver of Section(s) Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. W~V~ W~V~ ~~Wil rn Consultation Eji 8 112" x 11' concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if appJicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I ::;:'.~~t ~~~ :';r am either the owner of~~ o~gen,/ contract :::er and am acting with the knowledge and ~ OWner's Signature 2 $"-1 Applicant ~ BX'T . g 4 (.. í!-t:"n. ~ tJ. 50 ~ 0<:.1 ... :n.-S ¿.it:'. The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. .:=; e'E' A 'T'T>'K.I-It-o Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Se>5 14TT\4.t: 1f1:""() Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Sew A TT'Ac./-h:>::> 3 5-1 A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPUCANTS ~ a. Applicant name and name of development ~b. Date, scale and north arrow ~ Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions ~d. ~e. -.L f. ~g. /h. /". _I. ~j. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional informtltion required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANTS ~ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site -.£ I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers ---L m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour iotervals --=::::.- n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections ~ o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants ~ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed Lq. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule Date 6 J3ALZEQ - REFlECnNG TOMORROW March 26, 2004 S-l Mr. Chris Lowe Department of Community Development 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Hollins Road Rezoning B&A, Inc. Project No. RO4000S3.00 Dear Mr. Lowe: On behalf of Mr. Chad McGhee I am requesting tax parcel 28.13-01-27.05-0 be rezoned fromIlC to Rl to allow for a 16J: lot residential subdivision. It is anticipated that the houses will range in size from 1800 to 2000 SF and will range in price from $180,000 to $240,000. This project will comply with all development standard in the R-I zoning district and it is compatible with the surrounding residential development in the area. The request is consistent with the Hollins Community Planning area because it adds to the balanced mix of business and residential development. This project will be bordered on two sides by residential property, on one side by a county park and on one side by a business. This project will actually serve to buffer some of the existing housing from the existing industrial area. This project is anticipated to have a minimal impact on the surrounding area. Public utilities are available and appear adequate. Stonnwater management will be handled by reconfiguring an existing stonnwater facility currently located on the property. Please feel free to call with any questions you may have. Respectfully Submitted: ¡¡; ~ :L:==' me Project Manager SMHlbs PlANNERS. ARCHITECTS. ENGINEERS. SUMYORS ROANOKE. . "',,\.m',.ffè\,AIiF . :.HNNIl',)AH \;\lIn' 1208 CorporateCircle. Roanol<e. V1rglnIo2~18. (540) 772-9580 FAX (540) 772-8050 \'Jlo.nok..,erverlWornO...\2004 ProJ'\R04000S3\Chris Lowe!.lr 3.26-04,000 ..$- \ Legal Description for Tract B-IA-2 (Tax Map #28.13-1-27.5) Beginning at a point in the westerly line of Roanoke County Tax Map #28.13-1-27.4, property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (plat Book 10, Page 109), and at the intersection of the northeasterly corner of Tract B-1A-1 of the Nonnan D. Mason Resubdivision (plat Book 23, Page 19), being corner number SA on said plat; thence with the northerly line of Tract B-IA-I N68°41 '45"W 624.09 feet to point number 2A, being a point in the easterly line of the property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Deed Book 1460, Page 1284); thence with the easterly line of the Roanoke County property N21 °16'30"E 313.26 feet to point number 3; thence S73°04'25"E 599.09 feet to point number 4; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 25.00 feet, an arc distance of 41.18 feet, and a chord bearing S25°53'05"E 36.68 feet to a point on the westerly line of Roanoke County Tax Map #28.13-1-27.4, property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (plat Book 10, Page 109), being point number 5; thence with the westerly line of Tax Map #28.13-1-27.4 S21 °18'15"W 334.06 feetto point number SA, the point of beginning, containing 4.83 Acres and being Tract B-IA-2 as shown on the Nonnan D. Mason Resubdivision recorded in the clerk's office of the circuit court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Plat Book 23, Page 19. ~ . !~~ ~II ~ ~ I I "'~' , :.. "'","""'-" '~~:;"".:..,'" \ ,or. ::' I \ _::--U-6 I <,,- "'-. -""'" .t"'.:;f, Õ'. r-, ,...,."'., uN' &:</)-.., "" '"'...._, --.. @ ~==.,. ::,~~..., + ---,,--.. m., _.-.~-"..""""'---_..... ___m...__..~_, ::'::' ..:.:. ~ -:=::¡:- ~ ~ ':'::~ =':"'-'-"'--" -.....-- ===:'::'J.o;:,¡~.."'=""'-=-¡;'~m =..====~~'='Tr-':(T:-<;;' ~~--~--~.. - ~ "C:.:;.- ... ...... :......-... -',:::::;=.'~~';" ~'"::;=1!f~rÆ'.. ..~-;;-~;"\ <L L_' 0 ""... GRAPHIC sew: h..p -LU ~ ~ , :"::-:". @ ~EE'" ="'~.;,.r..." P.B. ----, PO. --~ ~ '~:- --- \ -- ~ ~() I :~=~- n""""""""""~-""--"" ...... ~ ~... 4~' --- =-:. a ....,_.......~~ ~ ~~,. ~~=n¡r..:v.....~...._. ~._-_.........-..._- . ~.__.._--~~ PLAT SHOWING THE RESUBOlVlSlON or PROPERTY or NORMAN D. MASON lilli' ~~! ~~a m ! a t ¡¡ . .. M ~;¡f 15~¡¡ M CREA1ING HEREON NEW LOTS NEW TRACT "B-IA-l" (2.33 ACRES) NEW TRACT "B-IA-2" (4.83 ACRES) BEING ORIGINIAL mACT "B-IA" (P.B. 17 PG. 5) SlTUAlED ALONG HOlUNS ROAD (ROUTE ,"04) HOlLINS MAGISTERIAL OlsmlCT ROANOkE COUNTY, VIRGINIA P.B. _.!'_-, Po. _.!.~- I Ii ,II; \1 ~I!I:: J~! IIII IIII! IIII Mill -'.wmo"""""" -=.............."'"""" 8 i ; ~ :1 I~¡¡. HI ill;! NVld !!JJS ~ """"""""" 3Ð\fT11A 3>4OOId8 . I ! ! !:' I I! 1°1 :! ;1 n .1' ¡lilli' 'I ¡ II"" !: ; t 1,,1;1 ¡ii I i mln!l ~ w " f a .' I~ ~I , i ,Lon"" I " :' ,-,. ,- ~J '"-', ~h-, -~~~!:=,:~4J,., 'íl¡~f~'r"III!Ij¡¡ H' '. ;/ .,j"j ""~I" 'l' "I"'~" I j,"" ~ .. ,'.J ';! :s \,' !¡. '¡ t,.::¡t 'Ij" -r-:¡-..,...mulum "Ti' ' :., - - ~ j,.,-, r~.~\--~~¿~~;~..'c:~~~¡~ 'J: + : LT=':~~:1-1 ';" ~h i' ' '\...<Y"""'~h'~\'I,>,~,;",I~.'I' "f I!';!I.' '11>:\,' ,,' ""~ j'..,'\' I," ,L____.;..t.J I ).t~: . ~ , lr' I (!~,,', ' ! .fr', ~L_-¡,,~ -"----, ¡ ;., " " ':I I I ~. , ;1 '1' ~ I " I, " , ,'" '~""'IJ(.-, "I' I"" II ,T I(~~ ~i' ¡ L~-'+-'~'"-\ä'i.f':::::".'~---:' ( , I,' I! : ~ ' ~ I'~ ~\ I' h,'!r -'-'.:'-~---1' r------~', , ... ¡,~, ~ .,"~ ' þ~ '--1,1, ,,~" , dr' ¡!¡ ,,':,1 ", ',', ',' ,I r---¡-,"""'--¡ I ~, S' r 1<', x~&-;¡!'Ij;¡\I,;~",,'11:]':1 ,'r--¡-o~,Ij, [,' ('1,;.,.,,1 "'I,I'~I;! 1;li""1 .1 ~i: '(\ I 1~~1t_.,.....,.-:--t----J , P I I . r¡; !i , r'\; 'I ¡, llh>--.,.::.~---,-< : l : f----,----i ,~ r ~ ~; .~\ ," l' \'~¡i ", : ;1 ".. ri---¡-;';:"--ii ~ I¡ I:'~ :~:',: k !L,r1"""I"I~1 ¡, I~i ,--,-,-,;.1.", ..~.,\<JJ,.l~~t11 ~:~~~~~j.l i ~t',--::.~~-~---1, ,:, ,".' "', i,~ ¡;,;¡! , :""¡ì ",,~"'Y,þ,,~ '" ;'~'L'c.--------, l',,' ~,)' ,',I:' ""'1 ',>, "I~ "1'" , ' '1; ~ I,-r:~"-(.-/ ,~,'\' ï ,1,-"" ( )" ""'""'c, tt;¿ , : Y~::---r'~: ,}' ,/ ~Fmt~-=-¡", "'" ":~ ¡j; 'i~i!: hi;!' ,\ ,,~;.pl 1':.",«;; ",),c"" ",'I', l.--,;.;"I ,II ", '","', 'c!\5,!'\I""'~.),"~~'¿j'>....." ¡,I,"" ' (I), ,,:,f,t( ,r'~-::!'/\<~c'<;<r;,/"~~:-J'í "" ' j j~' ::,",,>p "\ I ¡: .//---~I. "~-'¡'; '),) { ,. f¡¡ , ,,' \ ; A;/ ~\ '. ¡'~'\ '¡: ,i ),i(,I) ~ I l"I.., ~\ .~ I, , ;..h ,\,n~,L ~::.:L;;é.rl- :: ct~:::,~-t,~, _d j ~ r ,<.,~,f'r"! ~!!,I '. (.~,. ~" ,.\) II >. "~o' \. I) I'. ',~" ~' ,.'\. IJ'; ">- :J 'r i)', , l '~ o" " Ç"-) I ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Chad McGhee Proposed Zoning: R-1 Existing Zoning: IIC Tax Map No 28.13-1-27.5 ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 5-8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance granting tax exemption of property owned by the Salvation Army pursuant to Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 2003 and 2004 sessions of the Virginia General Assembly amended the procedure for granting tax exemptions. This legislation implements a constitutional amendment that shifted the responsibility for granting real estate tax exemptions from the General Assembly to the governing body of the locality where the property of the group or organization seeking the exemption is located. This legislation sets out the procedures for granting tax exemptions. In the past the charitable organization requesting tax exempt status for its property by designation would submit a request to the locality for a recommendation based upon statutorily-required findings. Then that request and recommendation would be sent to the General Assembly for approval. As of January 1, 2003, this request must be addressed by the local governing body. It no longer goes to the General Assembly. Under this new legislation, if the local governing body agrees to grant a request for an exemption, it must adopt an ordinance. If the ordinance to grant the exemption is defeated, the property will remain taxable. The ordinance shall state the specific use on which the exemption is based and continuance of the exemption shall be contingent on the continued use of the property in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified or designated. The ordinance exempting property shall be adopted after holding a public hearing. The governing body shall publish notice of the public hearing once in a newspaper of s--~ general circulation in the locality where the real property is located. The notice shall include the assessed value of the real and tangible personal property for which the exemption is requested as well as the property taxes assessed against such property. The public hearing shall not be held until at least five days has elapsed after the notice has been published. The local governing body may collect the cost of publication from the organization requesting the tax exemption. Before adopting any such ordinance the governing body shall consider the factors set out in Section 58.1-3651 B. which is attached to this report as Exhibit 1. This petition by The Salvation Army seeks tax exempt status in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia. The real estate consists of .66 acres located at 5511 Williamson Road. The assessed value of this real estate is $374,300 and the real estate taxes would be $4,192. The Salvation Army will agree to execute an agreement with the County for the payment of a 20% service fee in lieu of taxation. Attached to this Board report is a copy of the tax map showing the location of the property owned by the Petitioner. This property was purchased by The Salvation Army in 2003. A Thrift Store is operated out of this location. The Salvation Army occupies the entire structure and does not lease it out to any other businesses or operations. The Salvation Army has submitted an application to the County for tax exempt status, which is attached. It has also submitted to staff materials which provide a more complete description of its services, which are attached to this report. The Salvation Army is an "international religious and charitable movement organized and operated on a quasi-military pattern and is a branch of the Christian church." It provides food, shelter, clothing and counseling for those in need, provides rent and utility assistance when funds are available, provides worship services, and provides two Thrift Stores so that needy people in the community may receive clothing at a discounted price. The applicable provision of the State Code is Section 58.1-3650: A. The real and personal property of an organization designated by a section within this article and used by such organization exclusively for a religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural or public park and playground purpose as set forth in Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia, the particular purpose for which such organization is classified being specifically set forth within each section, shall be exempt from taxation so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified. In addition, such exemption may be revoked in accordance with the provisions of ' , 58.1-3605. s-~ B. Exemptions of property from taxation under this article shall be strictly construed in accordance with the provisions of Article X, Section 6 (f) of the Constitution of Virginia. FISCAL IMPACT: Tax exempt status will result in a loss of taxable revenue of the value of the land and any structures in the amount of $4,192 per year. This will be offset in part by the 20% service fee. ALTERNATIVES: After the public hearing the Board may decide to grant this exemption by the approval of the attached ordinance; or it may decide to refuse to grant this exemption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This matter is submitted to the Board for its consideration. S'.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 ORDINANCE GRANTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE SALVATION ARMY AND USED FOR ITS CHARITABLE, EDUCATIONAL, AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES ON A NON-PROFIT BASIS WHEREAS, The Salvation Army ("Petitioner") has petitioned this Board for tax exemption for certain of its property from taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia; and WHEREAS, that the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 11, 2004; and the second reading and public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to Petitioner's request was held by the Board on May 25, 2004; and WHEREAS, the provisions of subsection B of Section 58.1-3651 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, have been examined and considered by the Board; and WHEREAS, Petitioner agrees that the property to be exempt from taxation is the property of The Salvation Army. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That, in accordance with Section 58.1-3651 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Board grants an exemption from taxation under Article X, Section 6 (a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia of property owned and used by The Salvation Army for its charitable, educational, and benevolent purposes. This ordinance is adopted by the Board after holding a public hearing with respect hereto as to which public notice was given and at which citizens had an opportunity to be heard. In adopting this ordinance, the Board has examined and considered the provisions of subsection B of Section 58.1-3651 of the 1950 5-) Code of Virginia, as amended. The assessed value of the property owned and used by The Salvation Army is $374,300 and the property tax is $4,192. The Tax Parcel No. of the property owned by The Salvation Army is 38.10-7-28 and said parcel is located at 5511 Williamson Road, Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. That pursuant to Section 58.1-3605, The Salvation Army shall file triennially an application with the County's assessing officer as a requirement for retention of the exempt status of the property. Such application shall show the ownership and usage of such property and shall be filed within the next sixty days preceding the tax year for which such exemption, or the retention thereof, is sought. 3. That The Salvation Army has agreed to enter into a Service Agreement with Roanoke County providing for the payment of an annual service fee in the amount of 20% of the County's real estate tax levies, were The Salvation Army not exempt from local taxation, for so long as Petitioner is exempted from State and local taxation. This service fee shall commence January 1, 2004, and shall continue for succeeding years so long as Petitioner is exempted from State and local taxation. 4. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance. 5. That the Clerk is directed to forward an attested copy of this ordinance to the Commissioner of the Revenue and the Treasurer for Roanoke County, and to The Salvation Army. 6. That the effective date of this ordinance is 2 S-3 PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Board of Supervisors 13-5/2004 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 4, 2004 May 25,2004 A. REQUEST The petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone .800 acres from R1 SUP Low Density Residential District with Special Use Permit to C1 Office District in order to construct a public safety building, parking and access road located at 5929 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION No discussion. D. CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. McNeil then made a favorable recommendation to approve the petition. Motion carried 3-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: - Vicinity Map - Other - Concept Plan - Staff Report Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 STAFF REPORT $"-3 Petitioner: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Request: To rezone .80 acre from R.1, Single Family Residential with Special Use Permit to C.1, Office District. Location: 5929 Cove Road Magisterial District: Catawba ProfferedlSuggested Conditions: None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request to rezone .80 acre from R.1, Single Family Residential with Special Use Permit to operate a group home for girls to C.1, Office. If rezoned, this property will provide access andlor parking for the proposed Roanoke County Public Safety Building. Per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, all access and parking required for a commercial or industrial site must also be zoned appropriately, i.e., either commercial or industrial. The new building (approximately 80,000 square feet) will be constructed on approximately 8 acres that currently surround this small tract on the north, south and east. When these tracts of land are combined, this small tract will form the front corner of the building site. The site is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Roanoke County Community Plan and Land Use Map. This designation encourages Neighborhood Institutional Centers. While the proposed Public Safety Building is a more regional center it does provide some of the attributes of the Neighborhood Conservation district. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The C-1 , Office District allows an array of office uses. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Backaround - The property is currently used as a day use only counseling center for girls and boys. The residential structure has in the past been used as a 24-hour group home for girls, was operated by the County and known as Youth Haven II. TopoaraphvNeaetation - The property fronts on Cove Road. The rear of the property slopes away from the road. Grounds are a combination of parking, buildings and lawn. Surroundina Neiahborhood - The 43-acre tract that surrounds this small .80 tract is the location of both the Roanoke County School Administration Center and Glen Cove Elementary. Adjoining the School Board site and across Cove Road are well-established, single-family residential homes. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - This specific site will be used for the access road andlor parking required for the proposed Public Safety Building. It is estimated that 200 employees will work at the Public Safety Building. Due to the facility being staffed 24/7 it is estimated that 100 employees would be on-site at anyone time. AccesslTraffic Circulation - Access to the proposed Public Safety Building will not be from the driveway currently on this site. The access drive may go through this small parcel of land. A commercial entrance will be required for the Public Safety Building. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - No impacts to fire and rescue services are anticipated from the rezoning of this S - '3 site. Public water and sewer utilities are available. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN This site is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Community Plan. That designation encourages neighborhood scale institutional centers and the preservation of established single-family residential neighborhoods. The use of this small .SO-acre tract of land, subject to this rezoning petition, will not conflict with the Neighborhood Conservation designation. Having said that, it must be recognized that the proposed Public Safety Building would be a more regional center and while it provides some of the advantages of a neighborhood institutional center the size and scale of the proposed facility is much greater than that encouraged in Neighborhood Conservation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This small tract of land is necessary for the construction of the proposed Public Safety Building. While the building itself will not be on this tract, the rezoning is necessary so that the access and parking for the Public Safety Building is zoned consistent with the commercial zoning of the building site itself. DATE: 4/29/04 CASE NUMBER: 13-5/2004 HEARING DATES: PREPARED BY: Janet Scheid PC: May 4, 2004 BOS: May 25, 2004 2 8) County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning $43 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 :ii~Jf1i~:mJÛtgs CJ¡e1:k type of application filed (check all that app1y) r¡fRezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appe.al Applicants name/address w/zip ~<>.CD 0. £..p¿R.",';d:ii ?O. Px>'f ?-"i'òc° e.:, "'- ô\'-{ct8 Phone: Work: -:¡"+~-~(Yi<{ Cell #: . Fax No.: Owner's !WIle/address wlzip <;;ML Phone #: Work: -~:¡'?-';)..CC:¡« Fax No. #: Property Location I ':)'Í~'1 Coyc. í?P. l e.-r. -:t-'ò~ Magisterial Disnict: ~"""'?:60 Community Planning area: TaxMapNo':7ú,IC9-I-I/.1 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: . ~ Existing Zoning: e - I Existing Land Use: ~ii~:~rML1h pM ~,1It~M'tr~.1t~~~Ml.1¥{«~~@~ffijt ,...:: ...' Proposed Zoning: c- \ Proposed Land Use: ~e parce1 meet the ntinhnum 10t area, width, and frontage requiremems of the requested district? ~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQumED FIRST, Does the parcel meet the ntinhnum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ,."., ~...._...".. ........--,_..,......,"", No 5f~~:~~~#vp@~jii.îMM~~i.ii_,ffijiljL,.,""..c,:."... :,... ..-"..:..-,.,.,., Variance/Waiver of Se1:tion(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Admicistrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? P1ease check if enc10sed, APPLICATION WJLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Rlsrw V/AA Rlsrw V/AA Rlsrw VIAA B Consultation Ëíi g 1/2' x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes ami bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justtfication Water and sewer application Adjommg property owners I ~":~~ ~~r: ::.;. ~ either the owner ~ or ,v.-:.:r contract purchaser and am :ting ~: the :OWledge and ~ ~ wners~e 2 If~~~;(}~!i _p,LAN CHECKL1ST . -.' -- ",-,"-"".-'" _n- 5-3 I A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan sbBll graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan sbBll address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings. the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pennitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. UDless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning. special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The CoUD!)' Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or sCU2Ie feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County taX map numbers of adjoinIDg properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties - g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area ~d heights 1. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development - j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional infor71Jlltion requjred for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed - q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ~!I~ Signature of applicant 1!/~4 -Z-?: ¿y' Date / ( 6 11/ ,;) gS- L( 543 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY 0.805 acres located at 5929 Cove Road, Roanoke County: Catawba Magisterial District FINAL ORDER WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, filed with the Zoning Administrator a request for a "use-not-provided-for" permit; and WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission, which, after due legal notice, did hold a public hearing on February 19, 1985, ----==- at which time all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard and continued this matter until April 16, 1985, for further public comment and consideration; and WHEREAS, after full consideration of the merits of said request, the commission did recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the requested permit be approved; and WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County did hold a public hearing on said request on May 14, 1985, at the Roanoke County Administration Center at which time all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration of the merits of the request, the Board is of the opinion that the requested permit should be approved NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that a "use-not-provided-for" permit to allow the operation of Pathways, a girl group home be approved , said permi t to be for 5929 Cove Road, Roanoke County, Virginia, a 0.B05 acre tract of real estate more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on State Route 7BO (Cove Road) at its intersection with a twenty (20) foot asghalt drive; thence in a northerly direction N. 14 56' 15" W. 221.71 feet to a point; thence, N. 51019' 00" E. 116.90 feet to a point; thence, S. 42° 5B' 20" E. 210.05 feet to a point which intersects with a twenty (20) foot asphalt driveway; thence in a southerly direction S. 53° 00' 00. W. 221.98 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 0.805 acres. In addition there is hereby dedicated a twenty (20) foot easement for access for ingress and egress. And being a portion of that same property conveyed to the Roanoke County School Board, Deed Book 967, page 705, and as more particularly described on a plat of survey prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated April 17, 1985. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be forwarded to the County Planner, and that he be, and hereby is, directed to enter this permit into the official zoning records of Roanoke County. This action was adopted on motion of Supervisor Brittle 5-3 and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Nickens, Burton, and McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Minter A copy - teste: OS/lS/8S lr¿f~J!/ /.,~ P-J Donald R. Flanders~ Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File County Assessor County Engineer County Engineer Department of Development' County Attorney 5-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELDATTHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .800- ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5929 COVE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 36.16-1-11.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 SUP LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, OFFICE DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 2004, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 25, 2004; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 4, 2004; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .800 acres, as described herein, and located at 5929 Cove Road (Tax Map Number 36.16-1- 11.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1 SUP, Low Density Residential District with a Special Use Permit, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That the "use-not-provided-for" permit granted by the Board of Supervisors in 1985 to allow the operation of Pathways, a girl group home on this property, is hereby repealed. 3. That this action is taken upon the application ofthe Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. $"-3 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on State Route 780 (Cove Road) at its intersection with a twenty foot asphalt drive; thence in a northerly direction N. 14056' 15" W. 221.71 feet to a point; thence N. 51° 19'00"E.116.90feettoa point; thence S. 42° 58' 20" E. 210.05 feet to a point which intersects with a twenty foot asphalt driveway; thence in a southerly direction S. 531 00' 00" W. 221.98 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 0.805 acres, further identified as Tax Map No. 36.16-1-11.1. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. :--.. ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "- Applicants name: Board oj Supervisors Proposed Zoning: C1 Existing Zoning: R1 Tcu: Map No 36.16-01-11.1 ACTION NO. A-052504-7 ITEM NO. S-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 25, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and second reading of an ordinance to change the zoning classification of a total of 29.98 acres located at 4486 Summit Street upon the petition of Slate Hill " LLC; Slate Hill II, LLC; and Woodcliff Investments, LLC; Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a public hearing on the second reading of an ordinance to rezone 17.01 acres of R-3 property, 8.03 acres of C-1 property and 4.92 ofC-2 conditional property to C-2, General Commercial for an office/retail mixed use commercial development. The parcels have several Future Land Use Designations as outlined in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan for this site. The parcels closer to Electric Road with a C-1 zoning are designated as Core. The R-3 parcels and C-2 conditional parcels are designated as Development. Without additional information that planning staff and VDOT is requiring, planning staff will not support the proposed re-zoning. VOTE: Supervisor Wray motion to continue the matter for a period of 30 days Motion Approved Yes No Absent Mr. McNamara ~ 0 0 Mr. Church 0 ~ 0 Mr. Wray ~ 0 0 Mr. Altizer ~ 0 0 Mr. Flora ~ 0 0 cc: File 2 PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: S-Y Slate Hill 7-3/2004 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 6, 2004 (Continued from March 2, 2004) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 25, 2004 (Continued from April 27, 2004) REQUEST The petition of Slate Hill I, LLC, Slate Hill II, LLC, and Woodcliff Investments, LLC, to rezone 4.92 acres from C2C General Commercial District with Conditions to C2 General Commercial District, 8.03 acres from C1 Office District to C2 General Commercial District, and 17.01 acres from R3 Medium Residential District to C2 General Commercial District in order to construct a general office and retail sales facility located at 4486 Summit Street, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A. CITIZEN COMMENTS Several citizens spoke against the proposed rezoning. They had concerns about the unknown uses, the tree removal and grading, possible storm water runoff concerns, the appearance of the buildings, traffic congestion and access. Several representatives from the Sierra Club spoke against the project. B. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. John Murphy presented the staff report. Ed Natt represented the petitioner. The Commissioners had significant concerns about the unknown uses, appearance of the buildings, and storm water management. There were specific concerns expressed by several commissioners about VDOT's response to the traffic study. The commissioners discussed the size of buildings, the amount of parking, and the grading of the site. There was discussion between the Commissioners and Mr. Natt about the development of the site with the existing zoning. The commissioners repeatedly attempted to have the petitioner clarify the uses and provide more information about the project. C. D. PROFFERS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The C-2 uses set forth on the attached Exhibit A would be prohibited. The square footage of any building located on the property would not exceed 110,000 square feet. No building will be of a butler type building with a metal exterior. The roads shall be in the approximate located as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated January 20, 2004, prepared by Rife+Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit B. In the event VDOT does not grant permission to construct a portion of the road on the VDOT property as shown on said plan: the approximate road location shall be as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated December 11, 2003 prepared by Rife+Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit C. Structures constructed in Zones 1, 2 and 3 will be similar in appearance, materials and design. Structures constructed in Zone 4 may be similar in appearance, materials and design, but will be subject to requirements of specific users. 3 E. COMMISSION ACTlON(S) S-~ Mr. McNeil made a motion to make a negative recommendation on the rezoning. The motion carried 4-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: - Concept Plan - Staff Report - Vicinity Map - Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 4 s-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 25,2004 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A TOTAL OF 29.98-ACRES LOCATED AT 4486 SUMMIT STREET (TAX MAP NOS.77.20-1-3, 77.20-1-4, 77.20-1-52, 77.20-1-54, 77.20-1-55, PART OF TAX MAP NO. 87.08-3-11) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF C-2 CONDITIONAL, R-3, AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF SLATE HILL I, LLC, SLATE HILL II, LLC, AND WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 2004, and the second reading and public hearing were continued from March 23, 2004, and held on April 27, 2004 and continued to May 25,2004; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter which was continued from March 2,004 and held on April 6, 2004; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing a total of 29.98 acres, as described herein, and located at 4486 Summit Street (Tax Map Numbers 77.20-1-3,77.20-1-4,77.20-1-52,77.20-1-54, 77.20-1-55, PartofTax Map No. 87.08-3-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District with conditions, R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential, and C-1, Office District to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 1 $-'-1 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Slate Hill " LLC, Slate Hill II, LLC, and Woodcliff Investments, LLC. 3. That a portion of this property was rezoned to C2C by Ordinance 102897-19 at which time the Petitioner proffered the following conditions which are hereby REPEALED: (1 ) Petitioner proffers to build the Lowe's store in substantial conformity with the preliminary site plan, dated October 7, 1997. Except that Lowe's will flip the location of the garden center and the truck loading docks to the northern property area of the proposed project. (2) Petitioner proffers that if any out parcel that requires C-2 zoning is proposed on this site or the adjoining site of White House Antiques, it will be subject to a special use permit regardless of the C-2 use proposed. This will allow the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors the opportunity to review traffic impacts, circulation and access issues. (3) Petitioner proffers to retain the existing vegetation between the Petitioner's site and the property of Quail Valley condominiums. The only exception to this will be the removal of vegetation that is necessary for improvements to the access road for the existing residential properties. (4) If any of the residential homes on Washington Road remain, Petitioner proffers to upgrade, pave and maintain Washington Road to provide continuous, adequate and safe access to these houses. This upgrade will be to a standard acceptable to the County and reviewed during the site plan review process. 2 $-V 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing conditions attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which is titled "Proffers - Revised May 20,2004", which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 77.20-1-3 - C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-4 - C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-52 - R3 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-54 - C1 to C2C Tax Map No. 77.20-1-55 - C1 to C2C Portion of Tax Map No. 87.08-3-11 - R3 to C2C The metes and bounds of the above-mentioned parcels are further set out on the attached Exhibit 2. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 Integra,___- --, iiD\fl~((':::r~r:'Wi!"i'>i ", II"'---'oé_'_---~:"""--'-'il',i ,l~'i 1III ',:,' " MAY202,G"J4ii:ll: I I ¡IUJI ¡u. ~--==----_.~_J~J s-~ ~ Your Investment Partner. May 20,2004 Ms. Diane Childers, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Childers: Delivered herewith at II :45 a.m. on May 20, 2004, is a document with the proffers being offered for the Slate Hill project in Roanoke County. Also attached please find a letter from Michael R. Circeo, P. E. together with the geo-technical analysis prepared by Circeo Geotech and a letter from Gene Cress of Mattern & Mattern pertaining to the traffic study. These are being delivered today in order to be distributed with the Board packets. The landowner will continue to work with County Staff for further refinements, as necessary, in order for a submittal copy to be delivered on Tuesday morning, May 25, 2004, for the Board of Supervisors meeting. Respectfully, ~ Hunter Smith HS/pj Enclosures cc: Janet Scheid, Chief Planner Ed Natt, Esquire 4415 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD, SW., SUITE 303, ROANOKE, VA 24014 Phone: (540) 772.5090 I Fax: (540) 772.0106 E-mail: hsmith@integrallc.com s-v PROFFERS REVISED May 20, 2004 Hand delivered to Ms. Scheid & Ms. Childers 11 :45 on 20th Address of Subject Property: 4486 Summit Street Roanoke, VA 24014 Tax Map No.: 077.20-01-03 077.20-01-04 077.20-01-52 077.20-01-54 077.20-01-55 087.08-03-11 Applicant's/Owner's Name: Slate Hill I, LLC Slate Hill II, LLC WoodcliffInvestments, LLC The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with the rezoning request: 1. Uses a. The C-2 uses set forth on the attached Exhibit A would be prohibited. 2. Slopes a. A geo-technical report from a certified geo-technical engineer shall be required to verify slope stability and stabilization methods, and design values for retaining structures. 3. Buildings a. Height: Building height shall not exceed 50 feet (as measured per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance) unless underground parking is provided Then building height shall not exceed 65 feet, except in Zone 3 where the height shall not exceed 75 feet. b. Size: No retail building base floor area shall exceed 90,000 square feet. No office building base floor area shall exceed 18,000 square feet. Building area shall be calculated as indicated by the Virginia Unifonn Statewide Building Code. c. Materials: Acceptable building finishes include brick, wood, vinyl or composite wood substitute, glass, stucco or exterior insulated finish system (EIFS), split-face colored concrete block, stone or cast stone. s-~ Structures constructed in Zones 1, 2, and 3 will be similar in appearance, materials and design. d. Roofs: Rooflines of the buildings predominantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall be articulated. Acceptable roof materials include standing seam metal, copper, composite slate tile or shingles. e. Building Colors: The predominant building colors shall be tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick. natural stone. f. Facades: The facades of buildings predominantly visible from Route 220 and Route 419 shall have vertical plane relief. 4. Road a. Curbing shall be required throughout the entire road system. The curb and gutter configuration shall be standard VDOT designs for appropriate conditions. b. The roads shall be in the approximate location as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated January 20,2004, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit B. In the event VDOT does not grant pennission to construct a portion of the road on the VDOT property as shown on said plan, the approximate road location shall be as set forth on the "Slate Hill Proposed Roadway and Development Plan" dated December 11, 2003, prepared by Rife & Wood Architects, attached hereto as Exhibit C. c. All parking and vehicular circulation surfaces shall have asphalt top. Base and underlayment shall be as detennined by recommendations from geo- technical engineer. d. Roadway widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet from base of curb to base of curb. Maximum road grade shall be 16%. There shall be no on-street parking allowed. e. Minimum S-foot wide sidewalks shall be installed on at least one side of all internal streets to provide access between buildings in Zone 2. S. Access a. Petitioner shall make all necessary improvements to Electric Road (Route 419), Valley Avenue and Franklin Road (Route 220) as required by the traffic impact study and by VDOT. 6. Ridgeline a. No building height shall extend beyond the 1394 elevation mark and all building elevations shall be shown on the site plan. 7. Utilities a. All utilities shall be underground from the point of the utility transfonner to the interior ofthe site. b. Where design parameters allow, all utilities shall share a common trench. $-Y 8. Retaining Walls a. Height: Maximum of 15 feet. b. Distance in between walls: Minimum of 4 feet. c. Color and Texture: Tan, brown, gray, beige, natural color brick, natural stone. Walls shall be textured. d. Landscaping: One medium sized (5-10 feet @maturity) shrub for every 12 feet of linear wall. Shrubs shall be a mix of deciduous and evergreen. Shrubs may be grouped together. Landscaping behind retaining walls shall be as indicated by engineering designs for the walls. e. A Professional Engineer shall design all retaining walls. 9. Landscaping a. Trees shall be planted along the private entrance road every 30 feet, minimum 2 1/2- inch caliper, 50% native species. Flowering species that are street and urban conditions tolerant shall be utilized. 10. Site Lighting a. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 22 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, shall be down-lit or shielded so as not to directly glare onto adjoining streets or properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or properties shall not exceed O.5-foot candles. b. All street lighting shall be designed to complement the architecture of the adjacent buildings. 11. Signage a. No more than three (3) business signs shall be pennitted for each business. b. Restricted signs: The following signs shall be prohibited: Off-premise signs, portable signs, temporary signs. c. Signage shall complement the buildings' architectural style. Colors shall be in the range acceptable for buildings. d. All freestanding signs shall be monument type, shall not exceed 10 feet in height or 12 feet in width and signs shall be channel lit, ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or adjoining properties. e. All signs shall be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. f. One marquee sign shall be allowed on the Route 220 side of the development. The height ofthe marquee sign shall be limited to 40 feet. 12. Parking a. No gravel parking areas shall be allowed. All parking in excess of Roanoke County standards shall be constructed of materials as recommended by the geo-technical engineer. s-y 13. Stonn Water Management a. Outfalls shall be through level spreaders and have a 25-foot riparian buffer as a separation between the discharge point and the concrete culvert. Other design options may be employed if approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department and VDOT. b. Detention Requirements: I D-year post development equal to or less than 2-year pre-development and 25-year post equal to or less than 2-year pre- development. Applicant/Owner: SLATE HILL I, LLC By !~ Hunter Smith, Manager SLATE HILL II, LLC By I~ Hunter Smith, Manager WOODCLIFF INVESTMENTS, LLC By ~ Hunter Smith, Manager Exhibit A s-i Slate Hill Proffered-Out Uses PERMITTED USES IN C-2 DISTRICT 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Multi-Familv Dwelling Two-Family Dwelling 2. Civic Uses Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Parks and Recreation Areas Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses None 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Bed and Breakfast Boarding House Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Gasoline Station Pawn Shop Commercial Indoor Sports & Recreation Commercial Outdoor Sports & Recreation 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility I\JOLL YlSYSIUSERSICBaumgardnerlZONINGlSlate HiII.USES-C2.doc Page 1 of2 Exhibit A S-~ Slate Hill Proffered-Out Uses Special Use Permit 1. Civic Uses Halfway House Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership, Used Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash Convenience Store Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rentals Manufactured Home Sales Mini-Warehouse Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service Surplus Sales Truck Stop 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing Landfill, Rubble Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings I\JOLL YlSYSIUSERSICBaumgardnerlZONINGISlale HIII-USES-C2.doc Page2of2 ". ~ I~ ~-y _Ji!a9,.e 1 EXl1IlSIT 2 Metes and Bounds of Slate Hm I and II, LLC to be zoned C-2 from R-3 Total Acreage 17.01791 Jr i- " North: 8681.17167 Line Course: N 23-21-43 W North: 8879.93582 Line Course: N 22-07-52'W North: 9039.75859 Line Course: N 61-50-50 E North: 9224.57256 Line Course: N 79-24-46 E North: 9227.16492 Line Course: N 05-34-1~ E North: 9263.01446 Line Course: N 08-05-10 E North: 9867.13546 Line Course: S 85-46-50 E North: 9848.69262 Course: N 78-12-28 E North: 9883.27889 C6urse: S 13-46-53 E North: 9864.69732 Course: N 78-43-07 E North: 9940.41588 Course: S 19-38-01 E North: 9815.81235 Course: S 78-36-16 W North: 9737.41934 Course: S 08-52-15 E North: 9340.53781 Line Course: N 79-24-46 E North: 9357.29967 Line Course: S 14-28-48 E North: 9110.86458 Line Course: S 66-04-08 W North: 8681.17167 Line Course: N 75-57-50 E North: 8681.17167 I. :::: ~ Line I<..._,ine ~: Line I', Line ~' ~~ I ~ Î I I I' t Iii II !: I:'~ I!C\' I' 11 f' Perimeter: 4602.94 East: 53568.84778 Length: 216.51 East: 53482.99147 Length: 172.53 East: 53417.99308 Length: 391.70 East: 53763.35186 Length: 14.11 East: 53777.22105 Length: 36.02 East: 53780.71689 Length: 610.19 East: 53866.54784 Length: 250.65 East: 54116.52332 Length: 169.24 East: 54282.18971 Length: 19.13 East: 54286.74743 Length: 387.05 East: 54666.31877 Length: 132.30 East: 54710:77080 Length: 396.77 East: 54321.82565 Length: 401. 69 East: 54383.76776 Length: 91.23 East: 54473.44398 Length: 254.52 East: 54537.08498 Length: 1059.30 East: 53568.84778 Length: 0.00 East: 53568.84778 Area: 741,300.31299 sq. ft. 17.01791 acres 5:-':1 page 1 Metes and Bounds of WoodcUff Investments, LLC to be zoned C-2 from C-l Total Acreage 8.0377 North: 9867.13546 East : 53866.54784 Line Course: N 54-37-50 I'/' Length: 468.70 North: 10138.44151 East : 53484.35324 Line Course: N 34-25-50.'1'/' Length: 142.11 North: 10255.65914 East : 53404.00113 Line Course: N 43-35-03 E Length: 323.03 North: 10489.65009 East : 53626.70418 .. Line Course: N 53-51-55 E Length: 161.32 North: 10584.77828 East : 53756.99140 Line Course: 8 35-59-02" E Length: 267.89 North: 10368.00252 East : 53914.39529 Line Course: N 52-37-55 E Length: 12.09 North, 10375.34098 East : 53924.00466 Line Course: 835-56-05 E Length: 196.56 North: 10216.18927 East : 54039.35875 Line Course: N 59-55-25 E Length: 126.69 North: 10279.68178 East : 54148.99276 Line Course: 8 34-12-15 E Length: 99.55 North: 10197.35137 East : 54204.95343 T<ne Course: S B-48-57 E Length: 323.43 North. 9883.27889 East : 54282.18971 _ne Course: S 78-12-28 I'/' Length: 169.24 North: 9848.69262 East : 54116.52332 Line Course: N 85-46-50 W Length: 250.65 North: 9867.13546 East : 53866.54784 Perimeter: 2541.27 Area: 350,122.42769 sq. ft. 8.03770 acres ç- ~ page 1 Metes and Bounds of Cemetery "Not to be Rezoned" Total Acreage .03892 North: 8133.46988 Line course: S 03-35-02 W North: 8072.22719 Course: N 80-12-02:W North: 8077.07905 Line Course, N 03-35-02 E North: 8135.24141 Line Course: S 86-24-58 E . North: 8133.46988 East: 49768.64621 Length: 61.36 East: 49764.81033 Length: 28.51 East: 49736.71935 Length: 58.28 East: 49740.36229 Length: 28.34 East: 49768.64621 Perimeter: 176.49 Area: 1,695.24581 sq. ft. 0.03892 acres Metes and Botlnds of Slate Hill ll, LLC to be zoned C-2 from C-2c Total Acreage 4.92907 "Does not Include Cemetery" Total Acreage Including Cemetery 4.96799 North: 9110.86458 East : 54537.08498 Line Course: S 14-28-48 iii Length: 297.95 North. 8822.37677 East : 54611. 58594 Line Course: S 81-09-09 oW Length: 199.70 North. 8791. 66174 Bast : 54414.26356 Line Course: S 62-53-11 W Length: 316.18 North. 8647.56194 East : 54132.83397 .. Line Course: S 74-08-15 W Length: 148.55 North: 8606.95978 East : 53989.94332 Line Course: N 78-23-39\W Length: 10.00 North: 8608.97197 East : 53980.14581 Line Course: N 28-10-53 W Length: 2.43 North: 8611.11340 East . 53978.99848 Line Course: N 82-35-47 W Length: 68.80 North. 8619.97847 East : 53910.77607 Line Course-. N 09-32-14 E Length: 3.84 North: 8623.76189 East : 53911.41172 Line Course: N 80-27-46 W Length: 100.00 North: 8640.33056 East : 53812.79388 to Course: N 80-29-45 W Length: 247.34 North: 8681.17167 East : 53568.84778 Lrne Course: N'66-04-08 iii Length. 1059.30 North: 9110.86458 East . 54537.08498 Perimeter. 2454.08 Area: 216,405.61596 sq. ft. 4.96799 acres s-~ .w""'.' """ .'.OQ r~. 0.. /Q.. IIlJU"'M .. "KJUb I4JOOZ /MI CeWmltng 25 Yeœs ~ Mattem&Cr~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS'SUlWEYORS $.'1 J. wayne Crai¡¡ - W. Hubœ1I Gone R. Çm¡¡ MJchdoI S. ÑJO" Sloven A. Cam¡t>eU RaM.y W. Becknaf Wm. 1'l'1DInOO AuIën IIradIeV C. Crai¡¡ Dav1d p. WiL<On May 19. 2004 Bam K. Mattern, Jr. (1949-1982) Sam H. MoG1'Iee, m (RatirodJ Mr. Anthony W. Ford Traffic Engineer County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke. VA 24018-0798 RE: Slate Hili DevelOpment Traffic Impact Study M&C Commission No. 2252A Dear Mr. Ford: On behalf of Integra Investments weare writing this letter. To the best of our knowledge we have responded to all concerns and questions raised by the Virginia Department of Transportation wIth respect to the above-referenced study. The Study conclusions reflect LOS F operations during the p.m. peak hour for existing and buildout yeâr at both Electric Road (Route 419) and Franklin Road (Route 220). The recommeDdations included in the report conclude the omy practical mitigation measures for the development concept addressed in the 8Uldy is the addition of a separate right-turn lane into the development for southbound Route 419 traffic; and the lengtheniDg of the separate left-turn lane for northbound traffic on Franklin Road tUrning into Valley Drive. We âre uncertain as to what other traffic issues need to be addressed at this point. We would Uke to request that an itemized list be prepared that specificallY addressed those issues in the report that are still a concern. Thank you for any additional information you can provide regarding this matter. Respectfully yours. MATI'ERN & CRAIG 4~ f. c~ Gene R. Cress GRC/pmi cc: Hunter Smith ~ 701 Fnt Street. S.W.. Roanoke, Vùgjna 24016 K,\22122S2IAIAWPoro-L1r.doo (540) 345-9342 Fax (540) 34s:.7691 Ha~ 11 04 03:08p Hike Circeo 5403662379 p.2_.- Circeo Geotechnical Engineering, P.C. CIRCEO GEOTECH 59156 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Office: (540) 366-2379 Mobile: (540) 354-3260 Fax: (540) 366-2379 s-ý Geotechnical E"1'loratlons - Foundation Evo.luati... - Retaining Wall Design Mr. Hunter Smith Slate Hili II, u.c 4415 Pheasant Ridge Rood Roanoke, Virginia 24014 May 10. 2004 Re: Geotechnical Exploration for Slate Hill Roanoke County, Virginia - CGE Project No. G-021 Dear Hunter: As requ£sted. Circeo Geotechnical Engineering, P.C. (CGE) completed the soil t£st borings on March 5. 2004 to evaluate the subsurfoce conditions for the proposed segmental retaining wall to be constructed olong U.S. Route 220 in Roanoke County, Virginia. Our servic£s were performed for Slate Hill II. LtC in accordance with the proposal agreement, dated November 21, 2003, CGE Proposal No. 136-P. The geotechnical exploration included: Drilling four (4) soil borings along the wall alignment and performing Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) at regular intervals to a maximum depth of 30 feet below existing grades. Conducting laboratory t£sting on repr£sentative soil sompl£s for engineering classification purpos£s including plasticity, expansion (shrink-swell potential), moisture content, Standard Proctor (moisture-density relationship) and direct shear tests. Slope stability analysis and preparation of the geotechnical report. The geotechnical report will be issued by May 12, 2004. The geotechnical engineering report will include the soil boring lags, laboratory test r£sults and allowable soil bearing capacity and global stability analysis (factor of safety against slope failure) for retaining wall d£sign. The report will also include recommendations for subgrade preparation, soil compaction requirements for engineered fill, and minimum requirements for geogrid reinforcement and foundation drainage system behind the wall system. Sincerely, Clrceo Geotechnical E!!9lneerlng, P.C. ÆC~ President 1 5-V ","d 2B6S-t>t>E (Ot>SJ t S.l:J3.lIH:J~~ aOOM 'i 3.:1I~ eSt>:Ot t>0 OE .Jew . APR--øl-2004 11 : 14 OSTERHaJDT PRILLAMAN NAn 154ø'7'74Ø'.361 P.ø9/09 S-¥ w TOTAL P. 1219 Roanoke County Community Development- Plannin. Division ç-Y Memo To: Roanoke County Planning Commission From: John Murphy, Associate Planner Date: March 31, 2004 Re: Slate Hill Rezoning Request On March 3, 2004, the Slate Hill rezoning request was continued for 30 days, to allow the applicant time to complete the VDOT required traffic study and analysis and to develop a set of proffers that planning staff was strongly encouraging. Staff's original request was for a 60 day continuance to allow county staff and VDOT sufficient time to review and comment on the traffic analysis. At the public hearing the applicant assured the planning commission that this could be accomplished in 30 days. The applicant provided a copy of the traffic study and analysis to planning staff at close of business on March 29, 2004. At this time staff has not adequately reviewed the traffic study and has not received comments from the Virginia Department of Transportation. Staff has discussed proffers with the petitioner's attomey but has not received any written proffers. Petitioner: .$TAFE,R~Jf9J~t. . Slate Hill " LLC, Slate Hill II, LLC and Woodcliff Investments, LLC $-Y Request: This is a request to unconditionally rezone a total of 29.98 acres of C-2 conditional, R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential, and C-1, Office District to C-2, General Commercial for retail and office use. Location: The subject parcels are located on the hillside generally between the 4200 block of Electric Road and Valley Avenue adjacent to the Lowe's Home Improvement Store. Magisterial District: Cave Spring Proffered Conditions: None. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request to unconditionally rezone 17.01 acres of R.J property, 8.0J acres of C.1 property and 4.92 of C.2 conditional property to C-2, General Commercial for an officelretail mixed use commercial development. The parcels have several Future Land Use Designations as outlined in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan fo'r this site. The parcels closer to Electric Road with a C.1 zoning are designated as Core. The R.J parcels and C.2 conditional parcels are designated as Development. Without additional information that planning staff and VDOT is requiring, planning staff will not support the proposed rezoning. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site plan review shall be required. VDOT review and entrance approval shall be required. A traffic analysis and study will be required by VDOT to determine access and impacts on Electric Road and Franklin Road and adjoining streets and intersections. C-2, General Commercial, allows many uses including retail sales and office uses. Fast.food restaurant uses will require a Special Use Permit if developed on out parcels within a shopping center. The conditions from the G-2 conditional zoning proposed to be rezoned to C-2 relate to the development of the Lowe's Home Improvement Center. Specifically the conditions require the garden center to be on the northern side of the property, an out parcel will require a Special Use Permit when developed, existing vegetation adjacent to Quail Valley Condominiums will remain and adequate access to houses on Washington Road will be maintained. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Backaround -The developers have been acquiring the subject parcels and several adjoining parcels for over three years. Many of the adjoining parcels fronting on Electric Road already have a G-2, General Commercial zoning in place. During the grading plan submittal phase of the site development in early December 2003, the developers indicated that they had the appropriate zonings they needed to develop S- ~ their project. At that time comments were presented to Community Development staff indicating an interest in an office park complex with some elderly housing facilities. Based on that information a grading permit was issued on January 20, 2004. The entrance to the site from Electric Road is only approved by VDOT as a temporary construction entrance. On January 23, 2004, the applicant filed a rezoning request for an office and retail campus on the subject parcels and several adjoining parcels. The application includes a concept plan that shows the proposed private road curving through the site beginning at the former Woodmaster's site in the 4200 block of Electric Road and terminating near the cul-de-sac on Valley Avenue below the Lowe's property. T opoqraphvNeqetation -The collective total of all parcels subject to rezoning have a thick mature growth of trees and significant slopes. Some of the lower parcels on the Electric Road and Franklin Road sides were once the site of the McNeil Roofing business years ago, prior to a fire. These parcels are already zoned C.2. West of the former McNeil site, or higher up the slopes, are the C-1 parcels owned by Woodcliff Investments, LLC. The R-3 zoned parcels are situated further to the south, generally behind the self storage facility. These slopes are very steep and showing some signs of erosion. These R.3 parcels are owned by Slate Hill II, LLC. The final area subject to rezoning is the Slate Hill I, LLC property that is immediately adjacent to the access driveway into the Lowe's facility and directly north of the Lowe's Garden Center. This area has significant slopes and there has been evidence of past erosion and sloughing of the hillside. Slope map information generated by Roanoke County Community Development Department indicates a large percentage of the R-3 area has slopes in excess of 33 percent. In addition, a significant portion of the Co1 zoned area has slopes in excess of 33 percent. Due to the steep slopes and this location being a gateway to Roanoke County it is critical to insure that if the site is going to be developed, it should be done in a site sensitive design and aesthetically pleasing fashion. The applicant has indicated that retaining walls will be required for this project. These would need to be evaluated to insure slope retention and to indicate the actual area that could potentially be developed. The location and design of these walls could negatively impact adjoining properties below the developed site. Surroundinq Neiqhborhood -The general vicinity from Elmview Road, across from Tanglewood Mall, east to Franklin Road has generally been identified as the Slate Hill neighborhood. There are several homes and small churches on Elmview Road that border the subject site. Roanoke County has a water tank on a parcel above the Elm Park Estates Retirement Community. The properties on Elmview Road are zoned R- 3, Medium Density Multi Family District. The commercial properties on Electric Road are zoned Co2, General Commercial. The adjacent and frontage parcels on Franklin Road are zoned Co2. The Lowe's property is also zoned Co2 conditional. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture -The plan that has been submitted with the application is conceptual, and has not been proffered. No specific information has been supplied related to the size of buildings, site plans, architectural features, retaining wall locations, storm water management or specific uses owners or tenants. Staff has requested this information on several occasions without success. This location is a significant gateway into Roanoke County along the Route 220 Expressway and Electric Road and Business Franklin Road from Roanoke City. The site is as visible to Roanoke City residents as it is to Roanoke County residents and all traveling through the Roanoke Valley on the Route 220 Expressway. Without a proffered plan showing the types and appearances of any buildings, the site may potentially be a big box or a series 2 4. of small office/retail spaces. ~y Access/Traffic Circulation - A traffic impact assessment meeting was held at the Virginia Department of Transportation Office in Salem on February 19, 2004, to address access impacts from the proposed development on Electric Road and Franklin Road. Roanoke County staff, VDOT staff, the applicant and their traffic consultant were present. VDOT is requiring a traffic analysis and study based on this proposal. The traffic consultant will need a minimum of 45 days to complete the study. Once completed the information will require extensive review by Roanoke County staff and VDOT personnel. Without this critical information neither VDOT nor Roanoke County staff can safely evaluate the impacts on already congested stretches of Electric Road and Franklin Road. Preliminary Roanoke County Police Department data on reported traffic accidents show that Electric Road, in this section in the Tanglewood Mall area, is the primary location for traffic accidents in Roanoke County since 2000. For calendar year 2002, 49% of all accidents on Electric Road occurred in this stretch of road. With this type of preliminary data staff is recommending that the Planning Commission continue the petition until the required information is supplied by the applicant and County and VDOT staff have had sufficient time to review the information and respond to the applicant's traffic consultant. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Fire and Rescue services will be provided by Cave Spring and Clearbrook Fire and Rescue. Fire and rescue comments following their review of the proposed concept plan indicates concerns about the extreme traffic congestion at both proposed ingress / egress points presently and in the future. They do not anticipate an extreme increase in the number of rescue or fire calls generated from this proposal. Public water and sewer are not currently available to the subject site. Both public water and sewer, of adequate capacity, may be provided by extensions of public facilities. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The current G-1 zoned parcels are designated as Core in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. Core is the future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger scale highway oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. The centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their design and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. The site is not designated as an Economic Opportunity Area in the Community Plan. The G-2 conditional area of the site and the R-3 zoned area are designated as Development. Development is the future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. This designation also encourages greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. The primary objective of the Development designation is for residential development with a maximum limit set on the retail land. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petition that has been submitted refers to a 'planned campus' and "carefully planned road system which uses existing traffic patterns and traffic lights.' Planning staff does not see the proposed rezoning as either of these. With a C-2 rezoning, without any proffered conditions, this property may be developed from an officelretail complex to several big boxes without any County input on the design features, location of stormwater facilities and ingress/egress for the entire 29.98 acre site. The same reasons the developers wishes to rezone the property for development the high traffic counts, the high visibility from two major highways, the development along a ridge line, are the same reasons Roanoke County must insure that safe access to and from the site as well as safe traffic movements on adjoining highways and intersections is 3 provided. Due to the critical slopes involved with the property, with a substantial portion of the grades over 33%, it is imperative to insure that the development of the property is done in a fashion to protect the S Ii adjoining parcels and water courses below the subject property. The location is a gateway to Roanoke 41 County from multiple directions and highly visible from traveling motorists through the Roanoke Valley. Planning staff will require that the traffic analysis and study be completed and reviewed by County staff and VDOT. Planning staff does not support this petition and recommends that the petition be continued until such time as all necessary information is provided to fairly and completely analyze the petition. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: # 7- 3/2004 J. Murphy PC: March 2, 2004 BOS: March 23, 2004 4 ~ s-' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Philip Shucot COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 3071 SALEM. 24153.5127 March 12,2004 JEFF ECHOL! RESIDENT ENGINEI Mr. Hunter Smith 4415 Pheasant Ridge Rd. SW Suite 303 Roanoke, VA 24014 Subject: Slate Hi!] Development Route 220, Roanoke County Dear Mr. Smith, This is in reference to the proposed grading and erosion & sediment control plan for this development. The traffic impact study update for the commercial development on Franklin Road for Lowe's and others in 1998 commented that" ... consideration should be given to widening Franklin Road" (Route 220) in this area" ... to provide for three thru lanes in each direction", The recently updated long-range transportation plan (2025) for the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization shows this section of Route 220 on the financially constrained list with a recommended improvement to 6 lanes. hnprovements to Route 220 from the current four lane divided roadway to a six lane divided highway would inv01ve needing most of the existing limited access right of way along this section of Route 220. The improvements could also include the interchange with Route 419, the ramps and the median. The grading plan for the Slate Hill proposal shows the placement of fill within the existing limited access right of way. This proposed grading would impact the ability to make improvements to this section of Route 220. The proposed fill is also shown to come to the top of the existing rectangular drainage channel along the southbound on ramp. The integrity of this channel is a concern with the amount of fill shown. Therefore, the proposed plan has a major impact on future improvements to this section of Route 220 and is not acceptable as presented. VDOT would be willing to review and give possible consideration to a proposal that has much less impact to the limited access right way of way. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 714 So"," BOCAD ST, Fu ,..0> "7."07 ç-V Page 2 Hunter Smith Letter March 12, 2004 I am available to meet on items for this development. Please advise if additional information is needed. Sincerely, {" (', r; / 'j¡ (1:,/ /,- u .. Jeff Echols, P.E. Resident Engineer ((~, j),Q \/~!,,-.,;. ,~ Cc: The Honorable Brandon Bell The Honorable Onzlee Ware Mr. Dana Martin Mr. Elmer Hodge Mr. Fred Altizer, Jr. ,P.E. "j., "'í}.~...'/n'j I" ) /;'( -,." '; ¡ ,:' ,"!.. /- ì ;" ~~'l~~::P;4 l.v ¡ LL.. '-.:) \ fY' Þ"~'>r-J ~!E- County of Roanoke Community Development . Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive . POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl Date received: Application fee: Placards issued: Case Number Check type of application filed (check all that apply) E RezoIring 0 Special Use 0 Variance Received by: PCiBZA date: BOSdate: 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address wlzip Slate Hill I, LLC, Slate HUll!, LLC, Woodcliff Investments, LLC 4415 Pheasant Ridge Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Phone: Work: Cell#: Fax No.: Owner's nameladdress w/zip (same as Applicant's information) Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Property Location 4486 Summit Street Roanoke, VA 24014 Tax Map NO.087.08.o3.ll.OO.oOOO. 077.20.01-52, 077.20.01-54, 077.2()'(1.Q4. 077.20.01-55, 077.20.01.03 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Plamring area: Cave Spring Existing ZoIring: C2C, C1, R3 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: C-2C to C-2: 4.92907 C-I to C-2: 8.0377 R-3 to C-2: 17.01791 TOTAL ACRES: 29.98468 Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed ZoIring: C2 Proposed Land Use: Retail and Office Use Does the parcel meet the miIrimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUlRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the miIrimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST IfrezoIring request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 iv~1¡~;i~rt~1{j)f1J$~t~.~., . No 0 No 0 540n72-5090 540n72-5090 540/874-5755 540n72-0106 VariancelWaiver ofSection(s) Dfthe Roanoke County ZoIring Ordinance in order to: Appeal of ZoIring Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section( s): Appeal DfInterpretation ofZoIring Map to Dfthe Roanoke County ZoIring Ordinance -'I Is the opplicatiOll """,Ie"? Please ebeck ifcoclosed, APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RISIW VIM RJSIW VIM RJSIW VIM EE~ Eji"120'IIO"""""P,", EE"","",ion.. -...... M,.....__œ .,.fr=.lr.""""" J",I",""" w.~........- Þ4>;';"¡pn>p<>ty,...... I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the lmowledge and consent of the owner. /?-? - Owner"s Signature 2 Applicant Slate Hill I. LLC. Slate Hilll!. LLC. Wood cliff Investments. LLC The Plamúng Commission will study rezoIring, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space ifnecessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the pmpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoIring district classification in the ZoIring Ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEET Please explain how the proj eet conforms to the genera! guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Slate Hill Project in the Magisterial District of Cave Spring in Roanoke County is in conformance with the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Community Plan designates the area in question as a core area that includes office and retail uses along Routes 419 and 220. The planned use is in conformance with existing adjacent property uses: Lowe's and Rent-A-Space, and Country Store. The ridge line will not be disturbed, and the owner will take every measure available to retain a portion of the natural vegetation. The project does not impact existing Roanoke County parks or the Blue Ridge Parkway. The land owner has experience developing several quality developments in the Roanoke Valley and Southeast US, including Pheasant Ridge in Roanoke. The project will provide for an opportunity to attract several businesses that will provide for white collar employment opportunities. While increasing employment opportunities for the County, the project will enhance the commercial core of Tanglewood Mall and surrounding businesses. It is the opinion of the property owner, that the Slate Hill project will benefit the County and Mall by attracting retailers to the area. The property, which borders Routes 419 and 220, will be landscaped. Please describe the impact( s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoiIring properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including waterlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The project does not include a residential component which would lead to an increase in school enrollment. The project will increase the tax base of Roanoke County to help make improvements to the fire and police departments and the existing school system. The adjoining property owners are existing businesses who will benefit from the new retail and office traffic: Lowe's, Rent-A-Space, and Country Store. All other land that borders the project is landlocked or owned by an entity related to the property owner. It is the lack of commercial development in the County that has contributed to the County's dependence on real estate taxes to provide needed public services. The property owner has built and leased one hundred and fifty thousand square feet of Class A office space less than one mile from the Slate Hill project and several other office projects across Southeast US. It is this type of project that is best suited for the property in question. It is sound community planning to change the current zoning from an unconforming use, C2C, C1, R3, to a use suitable for the County's commercial corridor and the busiest intersection in the Valley. 3 S-\ Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The Slate Hill Project encompasses 29.98468 acres in the magisterial district of Cave Spring in Roanoke County of which a small portion needs to be correctly zoned from C2C, C1, R3. The property owner intends to bring to this area a mixed use of retail and office space in a campus-like development by bringing access to vacant landlocked property. The purpose of Roanoke County's zoning ordinance is to supply the citizens of the Cave Spring District and Roanoke County, of which the developer is a member, a high quality of life. Each provision of the ordinance is answered in an outlined form below. 1. Slate Hill will have two points of access. One point of access will be at Route 220, at an existing traffic light at the intersection of Route 220 and Summit Street. The additional entrance will be used from an existing point of business: fumiture store. The project is less than five miles from the Clearbrook Fire Department and Rescue Squad. 2. The project will be a planned campus. The road improvements for the project include a carefully planned road system which uses existing traffic patterns and traffic lights. 3. Slate Hill is a planned community development that incorporates all uses in a harmonious manner. The property owner has extensive experience building planned communities throughout Southeastem US and the Roanoke Valley, which includes the Pheasant Ridge complex in Roanoke City. The addition of access to the landlocked properties will open a new area of commercially taxable land that was previously vacant residential property in a highly commercial area. 4. The existing public facilities are adequate to serve this project: Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Squad. The expanded tax base for Roanoke County, as a result of this project, will help support areas of need elsewhere in the County. Currently, the property is vacant and inappropriately zoned, which results in it being of little benefit to the County's citizens. 5. The 29.98468 -acre development does not include any historic structures. 6. The project does not include plans for overdevelopment or crowded density. The owner has experience with projects in the Valley and will take the necessary measures to make sure the project conforms to its neighbors and existing developments in the County. 7. The project will include both office and retail uses. 8. Due to topography and location, the land in question is not suitable for agriculture and it is surrounded by over one million square feet of retail space. Any use at this location other than retail or office would result in under utilization of the property. 9. The land owner intends to improve the existing property to be a suitable gateway to the County's commercial area. The use of retaining walls will be employed along Route 220 to maintain the slope in an aesthetically pleasing manner and it will include landscaped areas. 10. Thomas Bros. excavating companies will be responsible for the ground disturbance. Thomas Bros. is a local firm with experience in working with the County staff. Also Thomas Bros. was chosen because of their quality of work and experience with large projects. 11. Thomas Bros. excavating companies will be responsible for the ground disturbance. Thomas Bros. is a local firm with experience in working with the County staff. Also Thomas Bros. was chosen because of their quality of work and experience with large projects. 12. The project before the planning commission does not include a residential use. The purpose of C-2 zoning, General Commercial District, is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service activities in an urban area, which serves a large portion of Roanoke County. The project satisfies this requirement. The area is surrounded by existing retailers: Lowe's, Wal-Mart, Rent-A-Space, Tanglewood Mall, Hunting Hills Square, etc. The immediate area around the Slate Hill development includes over one million square feet of retail space. The project is also located at the busiest intersections in Roanoke County with a traffic count of in excess of 88,000 vehicles daily. There is not a more suitable location for a project of this type in Roanoke County. The adjacent property owners will not be adversely affected by the rezoning of the property in question. The Slate Hill project will increase business for existing retailers and increase their property value. At this time, the neighboring property owners are adversely affected by the current zoning because it is non- conforming and it results in an unattractive environment for retailers. The Slate Hill project will increase the tax base of the County, improve the gateway to the County's commercial corridor, and provide the opportunity for white collar employment. A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the ' land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potenûalland use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. ' The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may . require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. : A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit. waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extta items, but the following ai~ considered r miDimum: ALL ~PUCANTS , ] ..L a. ApplicaDt name and name of development ~ b. Date, scale and north mow ~ Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions '¡ ./' d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Le. Physical fea1UIes such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. : I 7f. ~ zoning and land use of all adjacent properties -Vg. All property lines and easements 1 h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ,; :z i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the /; development ~ - j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces i Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the sile 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour interVals ¡- I - n. Approximate street grades and site distances, at intersections , - o. Locations of an adjacent fire hydrants i - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed - q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule , I certify that all items required in the chec1dist above are complete. ¡ ~~ /" Signature' 0 applicant I/Z~/oY I ,{¡ate' 6 ç -1./ SLATE HILL'S RETAIL NEIGHBORS (Partial Listing of Retail Within 1/4 Mile) Retail Center Square Footage Wal-Mart Store at Huntina Hills Plaza 117,573 Huntina Hills Plaza (StriD of Stores) 47,760 Lowe's 134,641 Play It Aaain SDorts 5,973 First National Exchanae Bank 4,284 Outback Steak House 6,465 Food Lion 31,687 Petland and $1.50 Drv Cleaners 13,740 TanQlewood Mall 393,582 ADDlebees 22,462 First Union Bank 6,298 Firestone 7,876 Kroaer 61,244 Barnes and Noble 25,800 Carmike Cinemas 36,625 Grand Pavilion 98,823 Fashion Floors 12,723 IHOP 5,013 Mac and Maoaies 5,935 Carlos Resturant 5,555 Airlee Cleaners 3,410 Famous AnthonY's 3,100 Wendv's 2,235 Total Retail Square Footage 1,052,804 Integra <5:-V ~ Your Investment Partner. A member of the Roanoke Valley business community... Integra Investments, LLC, specializes in the design, development, financing, marketing, strategic planning and operation of facilities. The chief executive officer is Mr. James R. Smith. Mr. Smith is a Roanoke native, who attended school in Roanoke and graduated ftom Virginia Tech. Mr. Smith has been in business since 1983 building communities throughout the Southeastern United States, communities such as, Pheasant Ridge. Pheasant Ridge, located in Roanoke, Virginia, is a 60-acre campus with on-going development since 1997. The campus includes Integra's corporate headquarters in an 184,000-square-foot office park, a 1O1-bed skilled nursing home, a 90-unit assisted living facility, including a specialized Alzheimer's care unit, and a 128-unit condominium project built in four phases. Phase 3 of the condominium project will be completed in the Spring of 2004. The campus has multiple panoramic views of the downtown Roanoke skyline and the Alleghany Mountains. Mr. Smith has grown his business to be one of the largest development companies in the country, managing more than $30 million new projects annually. These projects include nursing homes, assisted living facilities, medical/office buildings, continuing care retirement communities and mixed use facilities. Integra has been successful because it has provided high-quality, cost-saving development solutions to communities. We have done this by working closely with local community leaders, hospitals, civic groups and families to provide quality services. Over the years we have established solid relationships and have broad-based experience with community agencies. We know the business. Integra's track record speaks for itself. Respectfully, /,t~ Hunter D. Smith 4415 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD, sw., SUITE 303, ROANOKE, VA 24014 Phone: (540) 772-5090 I Fax: (540) 772-0106 E-mail: hsmith@rev.net Integra 5;- ~ ~ Your Investment Partner. January 23, 2004 Dear Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission: The Slate Hill Project is an opportunity for the landowner and Roanoke County to work together to build a commercial area in the County in which everyone can take pride. Currently, the property is vacant, under-zoned, and unsightly to everyone who enters the Roanoke County to work, live, and shop: please see attached photo. We can make it better. The landowner, James R Smith. a Roanoke native, is asking to rezone 29.98468 acres from a vacant residential use to an office and retail center: Slate Hin. The property is located in the core area of the Cave Spring Community Plan and will bring much needed employment to the County. The property's neighbors are retail businesses that total over a million square feet of retail space. Located at the comer of Routes 419 and 220, the Slate Hill property has a traffic count of over 90,000 cars daily. When completed, this $200 million project will generate a minimum of $2,224,000 a year in local tax revenue without placing a burden on public facilities. It will not result in a strain on the school system and be assured that we win not disturb the ridge line. To best serve the County residents, this property needs to be commercial. As we work together, we win build a new neighborhood of service and retail businesses that will make Roanoke County stronger. It is this development that win provide the needed spark to enrich this commercial corridor of the County to a level of higher prosperity. It is sound community planning to support the Slate Hill project as a place for Roanoke County citizens to work and play. We want input from County officials in the initial stages of the project in order to make this a major addition to the economic base of Roanoke County. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 772-5090. I am looking forward to working with you. Respectfully, /v~ Hunter Smith HDS/pj Enclosures 4415 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD, s.w., SUITE 303, ROANOKE, VA 24014 Phone: (540) 772.5090 I Fax: (540) 772-0106 E-mail: hsmith@rev.net Integra s:-y ~ Your Investment Partner. January 23, 2004 Dear Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission: The Slate Hill Project will be built in phases. The first phase of the project will be the rough excavation of the site to allow access throughout the property. Thomas Bros. has been retained for this service, and they will be completed by 260 +/- days ITom January 29,2004. Once the rough excavation is completed, the project will be built in zones in the order corresponding to the attached concept plan. At this time, a timeline has not been established for the construction of the different zones. Roanoke County will be kept apprised of any new information and timelines. Respectfully, ~ Hunter Smith 4415 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD, S.w., SUITE 303, ROANOKE, VA 24014 Phone: (540) 772.5090 I Fax: (540) 772-0106 E-mail: hsmith@rev.net 5:- " UNSIGHTLY APPROACH INTO ROANOKE ON U. S. ROUTE 220 AT SLATE HILL PROPERTY ~-~ SLATE HILL AERIAL WO"",",cswm"',..... """'., ,...-." "," 'xv, "....,.U "," "NO"" "'" ","",,^ "ONVO> """'°'.0.' "",""",NOJ3"""""'" . VINla\llA '3~ONVO\l . S1ßNNV1d-SilOA3A \IOS-Sil33N laN3 .::rd 'S3l.YlJOSSV N3GSV'Jn1 aI ........., Ð- ~ ~ È I ~- i i ~I II I E m ~I;I h'; .iI mnq ~ iii iii II ~~ 0: ¡¡ ¡¡ IV I!s I¡fl; II ~I!~ ~ ~ II¡; Ii ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ I . ¡,¡ j! !â "I' ~ -- " . ç-~ "'" t..:> ~1;1 - ..:¡.!. ~ ~ ¡,¡~ t..:> 'i' t..:> t &i~U~~~~~~~ i ~~ ~~h~~ a::¿~~a" i ~~~~I::I::/:~o;/:~~o;/:~ ¡g ~1O~!í~?~~~~trJ~dtrJ ~ Bc 8_-t..../:t /:11: " tci¡¡~U ~!í ~~~ ~ I C\)~~I:::::S8~~~!I! .. t..:>~ tIj !!i tIj ~ §~ ~ c.. .. ~ Slate i..ill Projeçt~s Phases ...' . . r .f;¡) V\ . I ..c:.. Rilò+Wood An:IJjteçs Røoaolœ, VA': DIIe: llU1U81Y 11). ZOO4 CommiuioD No. OJ03 ". + þ. . Inll ~ lilt! . f..si=> I if 1111111 lIlt 111111 1111111 III I , 1111" , II hi I 111 Will I I IfIll 11111 ..[ I . 11111 1111 I I hili .1-1 ~ìll ...""""O",O1"',IVW"-' ,""'-zu"""xv, """""""3NO"' """ ~N""^ "'ONVO' """OS '0" MS'n",^,NO1318"""""" ~ VIN19111A '3~ONVO1l . S1I3NNVld'S1IO A3A 11 nS-S1I33N 19N3 ';)'d 'S3l.VDOSSV N3aswm ~,-,~~. "" -.' """. ",-to ,"",,',,^"vnHV1' r.. "'." ~" ~"""""" ~c_,--";\"",C""";'f\\~_", . ~, "" ... D ; "\,/ ..., ;i ,....", ... \ ,-""",""'" "'r'\' \... < ~ ,,' ii t ) ... ¡hI Iii Ð'T \\ ! ¡!iB -"--~-" .. \\! il'~tH .-,- <iÍu \... .1 : ~~i¡¡ ~III '. . Ii! <I§~ al '\.. ~;I n..& !:llt~iI ..- .. 1~lh..& I_I! ¡;~ ill ""","',. \::):. git~¡ ~~~iml .. ¡I: /,/ \,'-;;- J= ~~I¡~§~!¡ .. af ,,/ '," :::-/11 i~&~~nl>l ¡u -~-)",,+ I> ¡~ \,,/ hi dl ----.! li~~i \ !: \. = . < ~~ .. r;:c:_J: .. " ,<,--"';~- \\ \\ U¡ ;11.' / \... , ",,-.. a. .. .. ~~ ~.II: .. ,.'- , " ~ \, Iii \,.. \ < II. / U. \, ".""" \.*;- i !; ..-,"- i! \ /"'~,:.'.\"h_.__-.- \, / ~U /\"'r'! ¡I n! il ';:/' I! ~. - , / aI/it. /ii.! i¡¡ II I ¡I¡ '},:~ ¡::-- ~i¡ l)i;';{:'::~--._>:~\,-,. / ,/ 'ill 'II! a. ~ !¡ it;... .'Pr¡//.f. / --/\ .. '!" ! . III " 'I .'ë,t/ll ,/ ~ ,,/ ., !; 't~l':' ~. 1 r¡.' ~i ~ . '" f¡j ~ . " . .~~.õt 1t!11 <!a ( u\ ~7~ ~ ¡ IfJg~~"¡¡ ~~IU~ ! h~tliE~¡ ~!! ;:s: tij. ¡ t s...'l To: John Murphy, Community Development From: Ramona P. Kern, Crime Analyst Date: February 16, 2004 Subject: Electric Rd Traffic Crash Analysis Listed below is an excerpt ITom the 2003 Traffic Crash Analysis Report. Electric Rd has remained the primary location for traffic crashes in Roanoke County since 2000. "Electric Rd runs ITom the Roanoke City line at Franklin Rd to the Salem City line near Keagy Rd and is over 5 miles in length. For the year 2003,17% of reportable traffic crashes occurred on Electric Rd as compared to15% in 2002, while the remaining locations account for 6% or less. Further analysis revealed that of the total 281 crashes on Electric Rd, 44% of the crashes occurred between the intersections of Ogden Rd and Franklin Rd. This stretch of Electric Rd accounts for approximately Yo mile of the total road. For the year 2002, 49% of all crashes on Electric Rd occurred in this same stretch. This area consists of a shopping mall, fast food restaurants, gas stations and other local businesses. Crashes tend to occur on Fridays between 15:00 and 19:00, Tuesday between 11:00 and 15:00 and Saturdays between 11 :00 and 19:00. The primary cause for crashes is Following Too Close (52%) and Driver Inattention (13%). In 76% of the crashes, the driver was charged. 22% of the crashes resulted in some type of personal injury." QInuntlJ nf ~n&nnh <;'-1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS MAPPINGIGIS PERMITS PLANNING & ZONING STORMWATER MANAGEMEI{ DIRECTOR, ARNOLD COVEY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, GEORGE W. SIMPSON,III, P.E. CHIEF PLANNER, JANET SCHEID February 19,2004 Mr. Hunter Smith 4415 Pheasant Ridge Road Building I, Suite 303 Roanoke, Virginia 24014 VIA FAX: 540.772.0106 Dear Mr. Smith: The meeting conducted on February 19, 2004, at the Virginia Department of Transportation Office in SaJem with Roanoke County staff. VDOT staff and your traffic consultant has indicated some significant issues that planning staff feels must be addressed prior to Plamring Commission action on your petition. The discussion focused around the VDOT requirement for a traffic analysis to determine the access impacts on Routes 220 and 419 from your proposed developmenl In addition, there was discuss;on about improvements and/or additions to turning lanes, right turn ü! and right turn out, access at the traffic signal near the Wendy's restau=t and the access close to the south-bound on-ramp to Route 220. In prev;ous discussions, plamring staff has Ü!dicated the need to have design or appearance standards related to proposed buildings within your site. To date, plamring staff has not received any proffered building elevations, site plan, design criteria, retaining wall information, final stormwater management . information or use restrictions on the s;te. Without these criticaJ issues beÜ!g addressed, plamring staff cannot adequately evaJuate 11Ie land use impacts of your petition. Therefore staffwill recommend to the Planning Commission that your petition be continued until such information is received. Please feel free to contact me at 772.2042 if you have any questions related to this letter. Sincerely, ~Å- ì"'-<-f~ John Murphy Associate Planner CC: Janet Scheid, Chief Planner Roanoke County Arnold Covey, Director Community Development Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer VDOT Susan Hammond, Assistant Resident Engineer VDOr Roanoke County Planning Commission Elmer Hodge, County Administtator Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018' PHONE (540) 772-2080' FAX (540) 772.2108 @ Recycled Paper APR. -OS' 04IMON) 13:29 VDOT SALEM RES TEL:540 387 5407 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Philip ShllCDt COI.tMISSIONER AprilS, 2004 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PC BOX 3071 SA~EM, 24153-5127 John Murphy Roanoke Cowny Planning P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 FAX: 540-776-7155 RE: Slate Hill Traffic Impact Study (received 03-29-04) Roanoke Cowny - Routes 419 & 220 Dear Mr. Murphy, We have reviewed the Traffic: Impact Study submitted by Mattern & Craig, Inc. The study, as submitted, is unclear and requires a more comprehensive presentation. Clarification and additional information that addresses the full impact of the entire proposed development is needed for a thorough review. We would like to reserve our comments until the revised study is submitted. A meeting of parties involved may be beneficial for review of comments and traffic: infonnation. Should you have any questions or comments, please advise. ::r~ Susan Hammond Assistant Resident Engineer c:c:: Edward A Natt '714 -- ......... ST. TRANSPORTATION FOR TliE 21ST CENTURY F.. (S"" 887'..07 "'ON" """" 387."" P. 002 S;-i JEFF ECHOLS RESlDõNT ENGINEER APR-05-2004 08'21 D5TERHDU DT PRILLAMAN NATT 15407740951 P.0V01 (~¡c,J 4/t./ôi 5-1 - .-.. --- -- TÓTÅL-P"-ø'1