HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/13/2001 - Regular
March 13, 2001
Roanoke County Administration Center
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
March 13, 2001
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the
Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first
regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 2001.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was
taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice-Chairman Joseph
Butch Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens
A@
(Arrived 3:10 p.m.)
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Supervisor Joseph McNamara
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M.
Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. ODonnell,
=
Assistant County Administrator; Kathie B. Scearce, Community
Relations Director
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County
Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
March 13, 2001
AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Hodge added a report from County Treasurer Alfred Anderson on the
Countys PG&E investment as Item D-1. He also moved citizens comments until after the
=
work session on fire and rescue staffing; and moved Board inquiries to the evening session.
IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of the Department of Economic Development for
winning the Addy Award for the production of the Center for
Research and Technology (CRT) Digital Marketing Piece.
Assistant County Administrator Dan ODonnell announced that the CRT
=
compact disc which was designed to promote the Center as a location for technology
related businesses won the Addy award in the 2000-2001 Western Virginia awards
ceremony sponsored by the Advertising Federation of the Roanoke Valley and the Ad Club
of Central Virginia. Access Advertising Agency, producer of the piece, submitted the award
on the Countys behalf. Advertising companies submitted over 400 submissions in 80
=
categories in the Western Virginia Addy awards program. Assistant Director Jill Barr and
the Economic Development staff consisting of Melinda Cox, Joe Zielinski, and Betty
Stewart were recognized for this achievement.
IN RE: BRIEFINGS
1. Report on repayment of PG&E Commercial Paper Investment.
(Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer)
March 13, 2001
Mr. Anderson advised that at the February 13 meeting, the Board was
informed that the County investment in PG&E did not pay off on their maturity date of
February 1. However the County has now received their $1 million investment plus
$5,734.90 in interest from PG&E, and there was no financial loss for the County.
2. Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development
Partnership. (Phil Sparks, Executive Director)
Mr. Sparks showed a power point presentation. He advised that there are 16
economic development groups in the state including the Roanoke Valley Economic
Development Partnership, which was established in 1983. The annual budget is $803,442,
of which 47% is spent on marketing efforts, 35 % on personnel and 18% on administrative
costs. In 2000, the Partnership received 320 inquiries, there were 35 prospect visits and 3
announcements.
3. Briefing by Delegate Morgan Griffith on the pending state 2001-
2002 budget.
Delegate Morgan Griffith requested time on the agenda to discuss with the
Board the pending state 2001-2002 budget. He advised that in 1999, 1743 bills were
passed, and only 1381 were passed this year. He explained that the Governor has more
than 34 votes in support of reducing the car tax by 70%, therefore, the House and Senate
cannot override the Governor. He also reported that there are not enough funds to give
March 13, 2001
pay rises to teachers, state employees and sheriff deputies if the house and senate go
back in session. In response to questions, he explained that he was also disappointed that
the Senate and House of Delegates could not come to agreement, and that they are
looking at revamping the entire tax structure with additional local tax options beside
personal property, Business, Professional, Occupational Licence(BPOL) tax and real
estate taxes.
Supervisor Johnson pointed out that instead of reducing a state tax, they
reduced a local tax and he was concerned about the lack of funding for teachers, police,
sheriffs and other local offices. Supervisor Minnix pointed out that if the County raises the
=
personal property tax, they will be considered the bad guys.
A@
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Second reading of ordinance amending Chapter 19, Solicitors
and Solicitations of the Roanoke County Code, providing for
additional definitions, revisions to procedures for applications,
investigations, approvals and denials, and prohibitions against
solicitations in public roads. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
O-031301-1
Intern Dana Lazzurri presented the report and advised that this was the
second reading of the ordinance which amends the solicitation ordinance at the request of
the Commonwealths Attorney, Clerk to the Board and the Police Chief.
=
Supervisor Minnix expressed support for the ordinance because road
solicitations which are currently allowed but would be prohibited under the proposed
March 13, 2001
ordinance are causing traffic jams and creating safety hazzards. In response to a question
from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Mahoney advised this ordinance would only apply to active
solicitations.
Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
ORDINANCE 031301-1 AMENDING CHAPTER 19, SOLICITORS AND
SOLICITATIONS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, PROVIDING FOR
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS, REVISIONS TO PROCEDURES FOR
APPLICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, APPROVALS, AND DENIALS, AND
PROHIBITIONS AGAINST SOLICITATIONS IN PUBLIC ROADS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that a dangerous condition has
developed on the public streets and highways in Roanoke County, with solicitors seeking
donations from operators of motor vehicles while in the street, from the curbside or from the
median; and,
WHEREAS, many of these solicitors are children who do not appreciate the
danger from moving vehicles among several lanes of traffic or from the obstruction of traffic
arising from these solicitations; and,
WHEREAS, these solicitations pose a threat to public health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of the County; and,
WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in
Section 15.2-1200, and Section 57-63 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 2.01 of the
Roanoke County Charter; and,
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27,
2001, and the second reading was held on March 13, 2001.
BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
(1) That Chapter 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, is amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 19-1. Definition.
March 13, 2001
For the purpose of this chapter, the term "solicitation" shall mean and include
any one or more of the following activities:
(1) Seeking to obtain orders for the purchase of goods, wares,
merchandise, foodstuffs or services of any kind, character or description.
(2) Seeking to obtain prospective customers for application for, or
purchase of, insurance of any type, kind or character.
(3) Seeking to obtain subscriptions to books, magazines, periodicals,
newspapers or any other type or kind of publication.
(4) Seeking to obtain contributions for charitable nonprofit organizations or
selling any goods, wares, merchandise or other things for the benefit of such an
organization.
(5) Seeking to obtain donations for individual usage by requesting food,
money or any other goods or offering services for these goods.
Sec. 19-4. Soliciting prohibited during certain hours and locations.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation in the
county at any time prior to 9:00 a.m. or after 10:00 9:00 p.m.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation from any
operator or passenger of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public road. A public road
shall include the areas of the median and the public right-of-way along the curbside.
ARTICLE II. PERMIT FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS
Sec. 19-21. Required; exceptions.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation for the
benefit of a charitable nonprofit organization, unless a permit for such solicitation has been
issued pursuant to the provisions of this article. This requirement shall apply to any such
solicitation made on the streets, in any public or private place or by mail or telephone.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any solicitation
conducted only among the members of the organization involved by other members or
officers thereof, voluntarily and without remuneration for such solicitation, or to any
solicitation in the form of collection of contributions as the regular exercises or services of
any church, religious society, lodge, benevolent order or fraternity or similar organization, or
of any branch thereof. Membership drives of any organization, either among active or
prospective members, shall not be considered to be solicitations for the purposes of this
section.
Sec. 19-22. Application.
Any person desiring a permit required by this article shall file a written
application therefor with the county administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors. Such
application shall contain the following information:
March 13, 2001
(1) The applicant's name and address and the name and address of the
organization for the benefit of which the solicitation is to be made.
(2) The name and address of the principal officer or manager of the
applicant, if the applicant is other than an individual.
(3) The purpose for which any receipts derived from the solicitation are to
be used.
(4) The name of the person by whom the receipts of the solicitation will be
received and disbursed.
(5) The name and address of the person who will be in direct charge of
conducting the solicitation.
(6) An outline of the method to be used in conducting the solicitation.
(7) The time during which the solicitation will be made, giving the proposed
dates for the beginning and ending of the solicitation, which time period shall not exceed
sixty (60)ninety (90) days.
(8) A full statement of the character and extent of the charitable,
educational or philanthropic work being done within the county by the organization for the
benefit of which the solicitation is to be made.
(9) The federal tax employer identification number.
(10) State and federal tax-exempt identification numbers.
(11) Such other information as may be required by the county administrator
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors in order for him to fully determine the kind, character and
worthiness of the proposed solicitation and for the security of the county and its inhabitants.
Sec. 19-23. Investigation as to purposes of proposed solicitation.
Upon receipt of an application for a permit under this article, the county
administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors shall make or cause to be made, within a
reasonable period of time, such investigation as he deems necessary in regard thereto to
determine that the proposed solicitation is, in fact, to be conducted for nonprofit purposes.
Sec. 19-24. Issuance or denial.
(a) Upon approval of an application for a permit under this article, the
county administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors shall issue the permit authorizing the
solicitation described in such application.
(b) If the county administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors
disapproves the application, he shall deny the permit. In such case, the applicant shall,
upon request, be granted a hearing by the board of supervisorscounty administrator.
(c) Upon investigation if it has been determined the applicant has
previously violated any section of this code then the application shall automatically be
denied.
(d) If the county administrator still denies the application, the applicant
shall, upon request, be granted a hearing before the Board of Supervisors.
March 13, 2001
Sec. 19-25. Does not constitute endorsement by county or county
administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors.
No permit issued under this article shall, in any case, be construed as, or be
deemed to be, an endorsement by the county or the county administratorClerk to the
Board of Supervisors of any of the solicitation or of the purpose for which the same is
made.
Sec. 19-26. Not transferable.
A permit issued under this article shall be nontransferable; provided, however,
that this shall not prevent any permittee from using such number of solicitors as are
required to conduct the solicitation.
Sec. 19-27. Revocation.
(a) If, upon receipt of written information or upon his own investigation, the
county administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors shall find:
(1) That the holder of a permit issued under this article, or any agent or
representative of such holder, is making or has made misrepresentations or untrue
statements in conducting the authorized solicitation; or
(2) That such solicitation has been or is being conducted in a manner
inconsistent or not in conformity with the intent and purpose of this chapter or in a manner
which endangers the health, life or property of the citizens of the county; or
(3) That any person connected with such solicitation is making or has
made any representation that such permit is an endorsement of the solicitation;
(a) the county administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors shall revoke
such permit and it shall thereafter be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation
pursuant thereto.
(b) Before any permit is revoked under this section, the county
administratorClerk to the Board of Supervisors shall give the permittee a minimum of
twenty-four (24) hours' notice, in writing, that a hearing is to be had before the county
administrator and that, at such hearing, the county administrator shall ascertain the facts,
and if any reason above set forth for revoking the permit is found to exist, the permit shall
be revoked by the county administratorClerk to the Board of the Supervisors.
(c) If the county administrator agrees with revocation of the permit the
permittee shall be allowed to appeal to the Board of Supervisors whereas the Board will
review the facts and determine whether is justification for the permit to be revoked.
(2) That this ordinance is effective from and after the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
March 13, 2001
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
R-031301-2; R-031301-2.h; R-031301-2.i; R-031301-2.j; R-031301-2.k
Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the Consent Resolution after discussion of
Items 9, 10 and 13. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
Mr. Mahoney advised that the abandonment of Arthur Thurman Road is a
two-step process and there may be a public hearing for public comment.
Supervisor Johnson asked if all issues concerning the acceptance of water
and sewer facilities serving Belle Grove, Section 2 have been addressed and if the roads
have been accepted into the State system. Mr. Mahoney advised that the issues have
been addressed and that he will check on the roads.
RESOLUTION 031301-2 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN
ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR
THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for
March 13, 2001 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through
13, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - December 19, 2000, January 23, 2001, January
March 13, 2001
27, 2001.
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley-
Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization.
3. Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Winn Dixie Food
Store.
4. Request from schools for approval of the Roanoke Valley Regional
Board budget amendment for 2000-2001 in the amount of $7,121.
5. Request from schools for acceptance of $700 Grant from the Virginia
Commission for the Arts.
6. Acceptance of $5,000 grant from Virginia Tourism Corporation for
promotion of Valleyfest.
7. Acceptance of $1,000 donation from Fab 5K Race for Green Hill Park
improvements.
8. Appropriation of $24,250 for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families
(TANF) Family Violence Intervention Program.
9. Resolution initiating the abandonment of Arthur Thurman Road from
the Virginia Secondary System of State Highways.
10. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Victoria S. Dillard,
Department of Social Services.
11. Resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting of Roanoke
County.
12. Acceptance of Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail
into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System.
13. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Belle Grove, Section
2.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where
required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such
item pursuant to this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
March 13, 2001
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-2.h OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
INITIATING THE ABANDONMENT OF ARTHUR THURMAN ROAD FROM
THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, safe, efficient, and controlled access is of critical importance to
the proposed Hidden Valley High School slated to open in the Fall of 2002; and,
WHEREAS, using Arthur Thurman Road, (State Secondary Route 1551), as
the route of proposed access to the high school was discussed during the siting of the high
school in 1999; and,
WHEREAS, to achieve safe access to the high schoolSecondary Route
1551, from Pleasant Hill Drive to its western end, a distance of approximately 105 feet,
appears to no longer serve general public conveyance warranting its maintenance at public
expense and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA as follows:
1. The County Administrator is authorized to initiate all necessary steps to
initiate the abandonment of this section of roadway.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Salem District Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-2.i EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE
RETIREMENT OF VICTORIA S. DILLARD, SOCIAL SERVICES, AFTER
TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Victoria S. Dillard was first employed by Roanoke County on
February 1, 1979 in the Social Services Department as a Clerk Typist; and also served as
Clerk III, Eligibility Worker and Senior Eligibility Worker; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard retired from Roanoke County on February 1, 2001 as
a Social Services Aide I after twenty-one years of service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard served all of the Roanoke County residents she
came in contact with while employed as a Social Services Aide or Eligibility Worker with
great care and concern; and
March 13, 2001
WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard was instrumental in the formation of the Case
Management System, a vital tool used by the Department's Eligibility Staff in conducting
their complex duties; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard, through her employment with Roanoke County, has
been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens, as well as her co-workers at
the Department of Social Services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of
Roanoke County to VICTORIA S. DILLARD for twenty-one years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-2.j ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE 2001
REDISTRICTING OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County held a public hearing to receive public comments on developing guidelines for the
redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and
WHEREAS, notice of this public hearing was published in the Roanoke Times
and World News, the Salem Times Register, the Vinton Messenger, and the Roanoke
Tribune; and written notice was sent to numerous civic organizations; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the following procedures shall
guide the 2001 redistricting process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County as follows:
1. That Roanoke County shall continue to be divided into five single-
member election districts; and
2. That the Town of Vinton should be contained entirely within one
district; and
3. That each district will have equal population based upon the 2000
Census, with no more than a plus/minus 5% deviation between districts; and
4. That each district should be compact and contiguous, unusual
elongations or irregularity of boundaries should be avoided; and
5. That each district shall be identified by clearly definable and
distinguishable boundaries such as streets, rivers, streams, drainage features, or other
permanent physical features shown on official maps; and
6. That districts should reflect "communities of interest" taking into
March 13, 2001
consideration rural, suburban and urban interests, as well as income and neighborhood
characteristics; and
7. That the location of racial or language minorities should be identified
for the purpose of establishing districts; and
8. That one or more Roanoke County redistricting plans shall be prepared
by Roanoke County Registrar Diane St. John, County Planner Terry Harrington, and
County Attorney Paul Mahoney.
9. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its
adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-2.k REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF OLD BLACK
HORSE ROAD AND A PORTION OF CAROLINA TRAIL INTO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a),
fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have
entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention
which applies to this request for addition,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form
SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.1-229, Code of
'
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Recorded Vote
Moved By:
Supervisor Minnix
Seconded By:
None Required
Yeas:
Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
Nays:
None
Absent:
Supervisor McNamara
March 13, 2001
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote with Supervisor McNamara absent.
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Future School Capital Reserve
5. Report on solid waste collection
IN RE: WORK SESSIONS
1. Work Session to present the Fire and Rescue staffing plan and
review call statistics
The work session was held from 4:30 p.m. until 6:05 p.m. in the Board
Meeting Room and was presented by Mr. Hodge and Chief Burch.
Mr. Hodge expressed appreciation to the Board for authorizing the addition of
20 career staff. He pointed out that the stations cannot function with just one additional
staff because it takes two people to take an ambulance out and three people to staff a fire
truck. He reported that Phase I is complete and staff is ready to move on to Phase II.
They have focused on the rescue side, placing priority on life over property.
Chief Burch showed a power point presentation. He reported that beginning
on December 11 a new dispatch system was implemented, and a complete analysis of
EMS calls was undertaken. He advised that from December 11, 2000 to January 31, 2001,
March 13, 2001
there were 1456 calls. There are currently 57 career staff with a planned staff of 77. At
this time, the Cave Spring station has enough volunteer support that they can adequately
provide Advanced Life Support (ALS) coverage for their calls. By adding three 24-hour
ALS units at three other high volume stations, it is projected that the County will be able to
provide 71% of the total County call volume with ALS coverage on a 24-hour basis at the
Hollins, Cave Spring, Vinton and Fort Lewis stations. The enhanced system will also allow
for the increase of career coverage to 12-hour shifts during the weekend days at Back
Creek, Masons Cove and Clearbrook. He reported that the other existing needs include
=
additional staffing for Clearbrook Station to enhance the zone ALS ambulance system;
additional staffing for Fort Lewis Station to enhance countywide ladder coverage and
provide second ambulance during peak daytime weekend hours; and provide staffing at
Mount Pleasant and at Bent Mountain.
Joe Coyle, chairman of the Rescue Chiefs Board, was present, and advised
that while this was not a perfect plan, and there are some valid criticisms, the plan is much
improved and the Volunteer Rescue Chiefs Board endorses the recommendations.
It was the consensus of the Board to bring back staffing alternatives and
financing options to move forward with Phase II with funding options to include increasing
the decal fee and the 911 tax. Another work session as scheduled for March 27, 2001.
IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Michael Altizer, 3005 Valley Stream Drive,
1. Mount Pleasant,
requested that the Board move forward with financing for Phase II of the plan and
March 13, 2001
suggested increasing the decal fee by $5.00
Michael Roop, 3033 Bonsall Lane,
2. Mount Pleasant Civic League, felt
that the proposed plan is flawed and presented comments from the civic league meeting
and a petition.
Krochalis, 8428 Patterson Drive,
Annie
Bent Mountain, President of
3.
the Bent Mountain Civic League, expressed concern about the lack of coverage on Bent
Mountain, and advised that the communities of Mount Pleasant, Catawba and Bent
Mountain have joined together to voice their concern.
Bradley Foro, 8235 Poor Mountain Road,
4. Bent Mountain,
complained that the tax rate on motor homes was excessive and asked that the Board
consider Senate Bill 115 which allows motor homes to be taxed at the real estate tax rate of
$1.13 instead of the personal property tax rate of $3.50.
Supervisor Minnix asked Mr. Hodge and Mr. Mahoney to investigate and
report back to the Board.
Brent Riley, 5280 Wade Road
5., presented a proposed resolution that
he asked the Board to consider adopting which supports use of existing pipeline easements
where feasible for the Virginia Gas Pipeline.
Supervisor Minnix asked that the issue be considered at the evening session
when the Board has had time to review the proposed resolution.
IN RE: CLOSED MEETING
At 6:10 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into closed meeting following the
March 13, 2001
work sessions pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (3) acquisition or sale of
publicly held property, i.e. Lloyd Property, Salem Bank and Trust, Salem Office Supply.
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
IN RE: WORK SESSIONS
1. Joint budget work session with the School Board and School
Administration
The work session was held from 6:10 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. in the fourth floor
conference room. School Board members, Michael Stovall, Chairman, Marion Roark,
William Irvin, and Thomas Leggette; School Superintendent Linda Weber, Assistant
Superintendent Jim Gallion, Budget Director Penny Hodge, and Supervisors Lorraine
Lange and Tom Hall were present.
Dr. Weber presented the proposed school budget. There was general
discussion on the loss of state funding. There was consensus to meet again in a work
session format again to discuss budget specifics.
2. Work Session to develop guidelines for zoning approvals of
private and commercial stables
The work session was held from 6:35 p.m. until 6:40 p.m. Ron Smith,
March 13, 2001
representing the Roanoke Valley Horsemens Association, was present.
=
It was the consensus of the Board to make no changes but requested
assistance from Mr. Smith with such issues as manure and odor problems which caused
complaints from neighbors.
3. Proposed amendments to the Street Light Policy
This work session was postponed to March 27, 2001.
IN RE: CLOSED MEETING
The closed meeting was held from 6:45 p.m. until 7:10 p.m.
IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
R-031301-3
At 7:10 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to return to open session and adopt
the Certification Resolution. Mr. Mahoney advised that Supervisor Johnson was absent for
a portion of the Closed Meeting. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-3 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has
convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in
March 13, 2001
accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification
resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion
convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
1. Report and recommendation concerning the acquisition of real
estate located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, known as
the Salem Bank and Trust Building. (Paul Mahoney, County
Attorney)
A-031301-4
Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss reported that the County has
tried to acquire property to relieve part of the space constraints within the Courthouse.
They also currently lease space in several buildings and have a ten year lease for the
Department of Social Services at the Salem Bank and Trust Building.
Staff has negotiated a contract to purchase the Salem Bank and Trust
property in the amount of $2.5 million. The suggested method of financing is a
March 13, 2001
lease/purchase through the Industrial Development Authority (IDA). The building will be
owned by the County, leased to the IDA for a period not to exceed 25 years and leased
back to the County. Mr. Chambliss recommended that the staff be authorized to work with
the IDA to create a financing package for approximately $2.5 million. The first reading of
the ordinance is scheduled for March 27, 2001.
Paul Bell, 2705 Hillbrook Drive S. W.
expressed concern about rising taxes
and questioned what the cost was for the purchase and where the funds were coming from.
Mr. Hodge explained that the purchase will actually save money because we
are currently renting space and it is estimated that the net rental income from the building
will be fairly substantial.
Supervisor Nickens moved to proceed with finalizing the purchase and
financing package. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Second reading of ordinance accepting an offer for and
authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the
City of Salem -The Lloyd Property, Tax Map No. 194-1-1. (Paul
Mahoney, County Attorney) (ACTION CONTINUED FROM 2/13/01
March 13, 2001
AND 2/27/01
This item was continued to March 27, 2001.
IN RE: BUDGET PRESENTATIONS
1. Requests from Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies
for inclusion in the FY2001-2002 budget. (Brent Robertson,
Budget Director)
Forty-eight agencies requested funding from the Roanoke County budget for
fiscal year 2001-2002. They were:
1. Roger Ellmore, Virginias Explore Park, requested $215,000.
=
2. Sigmund Davidson, Center in the Square, requested $75,000 and
presented a petition signed by 159 people.
3. Daren Gunter, Roanoke Valley Interfaith Hospitality Network, requested
$8,000 for emergency homeless shelter for families.
4. Ted Edlich, Total Action Against Poverty, requested $33,500.
5. Ellen Brown, the Transitional Living Center, requested $22,000.
6. William B. Robertson, Camp Virginia Jaycees, requested $70,000 or
$14,000 per year for five years.
7. Pam Irvine, Southwest Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank, requested
$10,000.
8. Dan Brown and Steve Smith, American Red Cross in Roanoke, requested
$4,000 for their disaster program.
March 13, 2001
9. Roger D. Matthews, Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, requested $16,000
to be used for transportation.
10. Dawn Field, Adult Care Center of Roanoke Valley, requested $12,480.
11. Ken Schutz, Science Museum of Western Virginia, requested $25,000 for
capital and $25,000 for operating.
12. Raymond Cobb, LOA Areas Agency on Aging, requested $25,698.
13. Katherine Strickland, Virginia Museum of Transportation, requested
$15,000.
14. Jim Sikkema, Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare, requested $117,755.
15. Karen Michalski-Karney, Blue Ridge Independent Living Center,
requested $10,000.
16. Mary Anne Chamberlain, Bethany Hall, requested $6,600 for their day
program.
17. Beth Poff, Mill Mountain Zoo, requested $12,000 for operation and
$125,000 for capital.
18. Dave Kjolhede, Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau,
requested $125,000.
19. Arlene Murphy, CHIP of Roanoke Valley, requested $21,600.
20. Colleen Carrell, TRUST, requested $12,000 to be used for their
transitional program shelter.
21. Jim Phipps, Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, requested $11,400.
22. Stuart Israel, Good Samaritan Hospice, requested $7,500.
March 13, 2001
23. Peter Lampman, Virginia Amateur Sports, requested $60,000.
24. John Levin, Mill Mountain Theater, requested $7,500.
25. Judy L. Larson, Art Museum of Western Virginia, requested $8,000.
26. Bob Slaughter and Richard Burrow, National D. Day Memorial, requested
$10,000.
27. Shannon Brabham, Prevent Child Abuse Roanoke Valley, requested
$3,850.
28. Aletha Bolden, Harrison Museum of African American Culture, requested
$5,000.
29. Carol Key, Roanoke Valley CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate),
requested $6,000.
30. June House, Big Brothers, Big Sisters of the Roanoke Valley, requested
$5,000.
31. Sandra Simmons, Bradley Free Clinic, requested $3,470.
32. Dr. Bill Krause, Opera Roanoke, requested $1,200.
33. Kent Chrisman, History Museum of Western Virginia, requested $10,000.
34. John Pendarvis, Family Service of Roanoke Valley, requested $6,000.
35. Kathy Ryder, Roanoke Area Ministries, requested $6,000.
36. Wendy Moore, NCCJ, requested $1,000.
37. Christine Poulson, Conflict Resolution Center, requested $6,000.
38. Pam Kestner-Chappelear, Council of Community Services, requested
$3,150.
March 13, 2001
39. Karen Mason, Habitat for Humanity in the Roanoke Valley, requested
$11,000.
40. Rob Logan, To The Rescue Museum, requested $35,000.
41. Treena Fogg, Alzheimers Association, Blue Ridge of Virginia Chapter,
=
requested $1,500.
42. Susan Doyle, Roanoke Symphony, requested $10,000.
43. Brian G. Duvall, Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce,
requested $10,000 for four years.
44. C. Hart Merriam, Young Audiences of Virginia, requested $5,140.
45. Greg Adams, Roanoke Valley Speech and Hearing Center, requested
$1,000.
46. Gene Post, Southwest Virginia Ballet, requested $1,000.
47. Becky Gilles, Smith Mountain Lake 4-H Center, requested $3,000.
48. Michael Chandler, Salem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry,
requested $10,000.
IN RE: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO THE STATE CORPORATION
COMMISSION CONCERNING THE VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE
R-031301-5
Supervisor Minnix moved that staff prepare a resolution to be sent to the
State Corporation Commission. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
March 13, 2001
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
RESOLUTION 031301-5 REQUESTING THAT THE STATE
CORPORATION COMMISSION CONSIDER THE UTILIZATION OF
EXISTING EASEMENTS WHENEVER FEASIBLE IN THE MERGER OF
NUI CORPORATION AND VIRGINIA GAS CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has
previously submitted its comments to the State Corporation Commission on Case No.
PUA000079, the proposed merger of NUI Corporation, VGC Acquisition, Inc., and Virginia
Gas Company; and
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2000, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
Virginia adopted Resolution 080800-4, emphasizing the important of co-location of public
utility facilities wherever feasible, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia continues
to support the co-location of this new natural gas pipeline within the existing natural gas
pipeline easements.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS
FOLLOWS:
1. That the construction plan that will be implemented if the State Corporation
Commission approves the proposed merger of Virginia Gas Company and the NUI
Corporation will not be in the best interests of Roanoke County or its citizens; and
2. That consideration should be given to the feasibility of utilizing the existing
pipeline easement of Duke Energy where it exists within the certificated 1000 foot corridor;
and
3. That the propriety of additional certification should be considered to allow
the use of the existing pipeline easement where it is feasible outside of the current certified
1000 foot corridor for the purpose of preserving and protecting the environment, the
viewshed and scenic integrity of Roanoke County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to
the delegates and senators representing the Roanoke Valley in the General Assembly
requesting their support for the Board=s efforts to preserve the environment, the viewshed
and scenic beautify of the Roanoke Valley by encouraging co-location wherever feasible.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
March 13, 2001
These reports and inquiries were made after the evening session.
Supervisor Johnson:
He expressed concern about the budget dilemma
because of the decreased state funding for localities due to the 70% car tax
reimbursement, and advised that he supported Senator Bo Trumbos assessment of the
=
situation.
Supervisor Church:
(1) He concurred with Supervisor Johnsons concerns
=
about the impact of the state budget on the localities. (2) He announced that the Salem-
Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce recently named Connie Finnerty, Clearbrook
Elementary School, as teacher of the year and Ken Broughman as police officer of the year
and asked Clerk to the Board Mary Allen to schedule recognition of them at a future Board
meeting.
Supervisor Minnix:
He announced that the Street Light Policy Work Session
has been deferred to March 27, 2001.
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 10:52 p.m., Chairman Minnix adjourned the meeting.
Submitted by, Approved by,
__________________ ________________
Mary H. Allen, CMC H. Odell Minnix
Clerk to the Board Chairman