HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/27/2004 - Regular
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
July 27, 2004
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for July 27, 2004. Regular meetings are
held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are
held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule
will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturdays at 4:00 p.m. The meetings
are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements
to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the.
Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance.
A.
OPENING CEREMONIES
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
Reverend Audette Fulbright
Unitarian Universalist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C.
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Certificate of recognition to the Department of Economic Development for
being designated as an Accredited Economic Development Organization
(AEDO) by the International Economic Development Council
D.
BRIEFINGS
E.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to authorize the execution of a memorandum of understanding
between the County of Roanoke and Roanoke County Schools for the
transfer of property in order to construct a new public safety center. (Dan R.
O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator)
'"
1
F.
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING
ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not
indicate support for, or judge the merits o~ the requested zoning actions but
satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will
be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.
1. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a car
wash located at 7443 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the
petition of Double D Mini-Mart, Inc.
2. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 7.83 acres from R1 Low Density
Residential District and C2C General Commercial District with Conditions to
R3 Medium Density Multi Family District in order to construct townhouses
located at the northerly end of Byron Road, Catawba Magisterial District,
upon the petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC.
3. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a
major utility service (stormwater management pond) located at 2820 Byron
Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Pinkerton Properties,
LLC.
4. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to conduct
recreational vehicle sales located at 6718 Williamson Road, Hollins
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Douglas Kidd, Inc., t/a
Brookside Auto Sales.
5. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a
telecommunications facility located at 7401 Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Virginia PCS Alliance, LC, d/b/a/ NTELOS.
6. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct and
operate a golf course located at 3687 Pitzer Road, Vinton Magisterial District,
upon the petition of George Golf Design, Inc.
7. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 4.514 acres from 12 Industrial District
to R1 Low Density Residential District in order to construct single family
dwellings located at 5132 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial District,
upon the petition of Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald.
8. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a
commercial indoor amusement facility located at 5728 Williamson Road,
Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Star City Comics and Games.
G.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
H.
'"
2
I.
APPOINTMENTS
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by
District)
2. Library Board (Appointed by District)
3. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
4. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community
Advisory Committee (CAC)
5. Social Services Advisory Board (Appointed by District)
J.
CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of minutes - June 22 and July 13, 2004
2. Request from schools to appropriate laptop fees in the amount of $216,600
for 2004-2005
3. Request to adopt a resolution requesting the Transportation Commissioner
and the Virginia Department of Transportation to review the following street
location for a "Watch for Children" sign, pursuant to Section 33.1-210.2, Code
of Virginia: each end of Starmount Avenue between Barrens Road and
Alpine Road, Hollins Magisterial District
4. Request from the Department of Social Services to appropriate $27,177 from
the state for fiscal year 2004-2005 for the Child Day Care Quality Initiative
Grant
5. Request to amend resolution 062204-4.d to accept and approve the Virginia
Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) grant for fiscal year 2004-
2005 and to allow participation by the City of Salem
K.
REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.
'"
3
O.
P.
Q.
M.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N.
REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Future Capital Projects
5. Accounts Paid - June 2004
6. Report of claims activity for the self-insurance program for the fourth quarter
ended June 30,2004
7. Proclamation signed by the Chairman
SENIOR CITIZENS HALL OF FAME AWARDS AND RECEPTION (4:00 PM)
1. Recognition of the recipients of the 2004 Senior Citizens Hall of Fame
awards. (Richard C. Flora, Chairman)
A reception will be held on the fourth floor of the Administration Center
following the awards ceremony.
CLOSED MEETING
WORK SESSIONS (4th Floor Conference Room)
EVENING SESSION
R.
S.
T.
CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of appreciation to Donald L. Davis, former Mayor of the Town of
Vinton, for services to the Roanoke Valley
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Postponed until Auaust 24. 2004. at the request of the Plannina
Commission Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 4.83 acres from
11 C Industrial District with Conditions to R1 Low Density Residential District
for a development of single family housing located at Tract B 1-A-2 of Mason
'"
4
-.--..-------.--
Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Balzer &
Associates, Inc.
2. Continued until September 28. 2004 at the reQuest of the Planning
Commission Public hearing to receive public comments on a proposal to
adopt a revised Community (Comprehensive) Plan for Roanoke County,
Virginia. The proposed Community Plan is comprised of both text and maps.
Once recommended by the Planning Commission and adopted by the Board
of Supervisors, the plan will serve as a general guide for long-range use and
development of all land within Roanoke County. The proposed plan has been
prepared in accordance with guidelines contained in Sections 15.2-2223 and
2224 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 30-8-1 of the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance.
3. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone a 1.3 acre and a 97 acre tract of
real estate located south of Whistler Drive and Creek Circle and east of Apple
Grove Lane (Tax Map Nos. 95.03-2-19, 19.2, and 33) from AG3 and AR,
respectively, to PRD Planned Residential District with conditions, Windsor
Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Sam L. and Mercedes P. Hardy.
(Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
U.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
V.
W.
ADJOURNMENT
'"
5
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
c - \.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Certificate of recognition to the Department of Economic
Development for being designated as an Accredited Economic
Development Organization (AEDO) by the International
Economic Development Council (IEDC)
Elmer C. Hodge êJ{
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ o-J ~ ...e.1+ c.J!. ~ ~ 0'0 ~ 4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside to recognize the Department of Economic Development for
being designated as an Accredited Economic Development Organization (AEDO) by the
International Economic Development Council (IEDC). There are currently only 25 other
organizations with AEDO status. In addition, Roanoke County's Department of Economic
Development joins the City of Roanoke's Department of Economic Development and the
Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership who have also achieved AEDO status
leading to the creation of the first fully-accredited region in the nation.
The International Economic Development Council's Accredited Economic Development
Organization Program recognizes the professional excellence of economic development
organizations throughout North America through a process of critical evaluation and peer
mentoring by certified professionals regarding internal and external operations.
The initial accreditation period is for three years, after which it will be necessary for the
Department to seek re-accreditation. Re-accreditation will also be for a period of three
years, as will successive periods of re-accreditation.
The accreditation evaluation process consisted of two phases after which a written report
of findings was filed and the determination made. The two phases were:
Þ- Documentation Review. This part of the process helped determine eligibility for
accreditation and consisted of documentation relevant to the mission, goals and activities
'"
1
~- !
of the Department. This documentation was assembled in three binders and sent to the
IEDC.
~ Site Visit. This phase of the process was designed to assess the Department in action.
The site visit team was comprised of economic development professionals who had at least
ten years experience in the economic development profession or were Certified Economic
Developers. The criteria evaluated included internal environment, leadership, external
environment, and financial resources. A community tour was also taken.
e
2
C-\
~UtÚ!' of 3aoano~
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
AWARDED TO
The Department of Economic
Development
for receiving accreditation from the International Economic Development Council
~ The International Economic Development Council's Accredited Economic
Development Organization (AEDO) Program recognizes the professional
excellence of economic development entities throughout North America through a
process of critical evaluation and peer mentoring by certified professionals.
~ Roanoke County's Department of Economic Development has successfully
completed the accreditation evaluation process which is designed to elicit specific
information about the applicant's structure, organization, funding, programs, and
staff and consists of two phases: documentation review to determine eligibility, and
a site visit to assess the organization in action.
~ Roanoke County's Department of Economic Development joins the City of
Roanoke's Department of Economic Development and the Roanoke Valley
Economic Development Partnership in achieving this designation leading to the
creation of the first fully-accredited region in the nation.
Presented this 2th day of July, 2004
~ , c).....5) G. ~ ~ do,.
Richard C. Flora, Chairman
~uki!#.~
Michael W. Altizer, Vice-C airman
'"
r
"""'~ Q. W
Michael A. Wray ~
ACTION NO.
E-I
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to authorize the execution of a memorandum of
understanding between the County of Roanoke and Roanoke
County Schools for the transfer of property in order to construct
a new public safety center
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan R. O'Donnell
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This memorandum of understanding sets up the framework for the transfer of
approximately ten acres of land adjacent to the School Board administrative offices to the
County Board of Supervisors for the location of the new Public Safety
Building/Communications Center. This memorandum does not actually transfer land as the
exact parcel will have to be platted and subdivided based on the final development plans of
the selected development proposal prior to a formal land transfer.
At their meeting on July 15, 2004, the School Board authorized the execution of this
memorandum of understanding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no cash transfer in the proposed agreement. The County will be responsible for
the provision of replacement warehouses and will agree to work with the School Board to
find funding in future budgets to renovate the existing Public Safety Building back into a
facility for use by the School Board.
'"
'ê -
ALTERNATIVES:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the memorandum of understanding.
Memorandum of Understanding
The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding between the Roanoke COWlty Board
of Supervisors (Board of Supervisors) and the Roanoke COWlty School Board (School
Board) is to signify the intent of the School Board to cooperate in the provision of a site
for a Public Safety Building in exchange for the current Roanoke COWlty Public Safety
Building and the construction of a new warehouse adjacent to the School Board
Administrative Offices on Cove Road. This memorandum is intended to establtslí the
framework of future legal agreements to be executed between Board of Supervisors and
the School Board.
The parties agree to proceed with the following;
1) The School Board agrees to transfer the ownership of no more than ten (10) acres of
property at the site of the current School Board Administrative Offices, 5937 Cove Road,
to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for the purposes of construction of a Public
Safety Building of approximately 80,000 square feet. The exact metes and bounds of the
acreage will be detennined by future surveys and site plans and will be the subject of a
future agreement and fonnalland transfer.
2) As soon as practical following the occupancy of the new Public Safety Building at the
Cove Road location by the County, the Board of Supervisors agrees to transfer ownership
of the current Public Safety Building and site located at 5368 Peters Creek Road to the
School Board. The Board of Supervisors furthennore agrees to pursue funds in future
budgets for renovation of the current Public Safety Building back to a school building.
3) The Roanoke COWlty Board of Supervisors agrees to grade an earthen pad on the
School Board's property on Cove Road for the School Board to use for the replacement
of the warehouses that will be demolished as part of the site preparation for the proposed
Public Safety Building and to construct replacement warehouses. The exact location and
design of the replacement warehouses will be detennined mutually by the Board of
Supervisors and the School Board.
4) The School Board agrees to transfer ownership of the current Roanoke County Career
Center, located at 100 Highland Road, Vinton, to the Board of Supervisors if and when
the facility is no longer needed by the School Board.
Approved this day of by the Roanoke COWlty School Board
and the Roanoke COWlty Board of Supervisors.
J eÍTy L. ~anada, Chairman
Roanoke COWlty School Board
Richard C. Flora, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
'"
E-\
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
1=\-8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27, 2004
Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning
ordinances; consent agenda
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Scheid
Chief Planner
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in
the man ner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing
and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these
ordinances is scheduled for Auqust 24. 2004.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1. The petition of Double D Mini-Mart, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a car
wash located at 7443 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
2. The petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC to rezone 7.83 acres from R1 Low Density
Residential District and C2C General Commercial District with Conditions to R3 Medium
Density Multi Family District in order to construct townhouses located at the northerly
end of Byron Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
'"
1
FI-~
3. The petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a
major utility service (stormwater management pond) located at 2820 Byron Drive,
Catawba Magisterial District.
4. The petition of Jerry Douglas Kidd, Inc., t/a Brookside Auto Sales, to obtain a Special
Use Permit to conduct recreational vehicle sales located at 6718 Williamson Road,
Hollins Magisterial District.
5. The petition of Virginia PCS Alliance, LC, d/b/a NTELOS, to obtain a Special Use Permit
to construct a telecommunications facility located at 7401 Barrens Road, Hollins
Magisterial District.
6. The petition of George Golf Design, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct and
operate a golf course located at 3687 Pitzer Road, Vinton Magisterial District.
7. The petition of Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald to rezone 4.514 acres from 12 Industrial
District to R1 Low Density Residential District in order to construct single family
dwellings located at 5132 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
8. The petition of Star City Comics and Games to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a
commercial indoor amusement facility located at 5728 Williamson Road, Hollins
Magisterial District.
Maps are attached and more detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the first readings of these rezoning ordinances for
the purpose of scheduling the second readings and public hearings for AuQust 24.2004.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Items 1-8, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
2
f - \
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zonmg
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
Received by:
Application fee:
PCIBZA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke V A 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
:\~ø.~l~ig~~' .'" ,.H :'.",.':',,"."'.
Check type of application med (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning OtSpecial Use 0 Variance
Placards issued:
BOS dare:
Case Numbc:r
...,~,.,.,.......",.",..,.,...,.._"...,."....,~.......,"'..
, ,
0 Waiver
0 Admmistiarlvc Appeal
Applicants nameladdress w/zip
Double D Mjni~rt, Inc.
c/o Sunnybrook Auto Wash, P. O. Box 7206 24019
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd., 24018
Phone:
Work: 725-8180
Cell #:
Fax No.: 772-0126
Owner's name/address w/zip
Sunnybrook Holdings, Inc.
P. O. Box 7295, Roanoke, VA 24019
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd.,
Property Location
Phone #:
Work: 725-8180
Fax No. #: 77:>-0126
24018
7443 Wi II iamson Road
'.
Magisterial District: Ho II j ns
Community P1annillg area.: \-\ 0 \ \ \ * So
Tax Map No.:
027.11-02-05
Existing Zoning:
C-2
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1 .560 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant
;~~~~~~{f~4t;iffi f{$Æ.ii~~:ii:::t~j~ii~i-ii~ljim..'~, ..~:~'~",-,- :". .,:,.~~:", .'. ~..,~:':: '-'~.....~~~.~-~:_,_:.~~
Proposed Zoning: C- 2
Proposed Land Use: car wash faci I i ty
Does the parcel meet the minimum 1otarea, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
~ No IF NO, A V AlUANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
'tõë"s the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? @ No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST '. ,
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No M
"",-,._"'"".'~""","_."h"'.' '.', ..",.. ,.",."h'.":""""...,,.,.,.~.,...,.,"'_"'.'..""""':'"~"""",:""","""".h.':':"",.".¡""",._"-".,,, ".-. , ......."-."_.,,...,.,,,-".'.,"""'"
"'1i,,;~i;i;i;,.z'>xr-"'" "'¡'-J;T¥,:.,,;i;¡r;.¡..1 ;:'¡~:i',_;':'""'-~"~-=~ ':'.""-1'5.."- 'i1?."'.-il~;i:9?ifrl.rs. 'IT'.f''''''' ~ì ,', -
~.~~~¿~~J~,~ -!Y..'!+i'~~ÛZil§I'M~{tg.!rf,f'.~~~,"'::£:..",,~!.:t;:".," ~!,fN(¿"';..~;;.,:~:",i:.,' J.;~.:",; .:::~. '...:;";':';M'---"'-'-'-"".";'.""""
, -
V8IÍMlcefWaiver of Sectìon(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance irl order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administmor's decision to
Appea.1 of Interpretation of Section(s):
Appea.1 of Interpretation of Zonmg Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enc1osed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RJsrw V/AA RlSIW V/AA RJSIW VIM
00 Consultation Eij. 8 112" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee '
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable
h, X Justification Water and sewer application X~ Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purcltàser and am acting with the knowledge and
consent of the owner. ~~o,^~... ~jngs, Inc. ~1~.i~T(il>{'I~~-Mart, I";:.
Its ~- ~
F-- I
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
DOUBLE D MINI-MART, INC.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The purpose of the C-2 District is to provide for a variety of commercial and service-related activities
within the urban service area serving the community. The car wash facility, at this location, would provide
a service to the residents in the area. The C-2 District provides for general commercial uses.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The fand use designation for the property in the Hollins service area is CORE.
appropriate for highway-oriented uses.
CO RE uses are
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
There should be no negative impact on County facilities, including roads, schools, police and fire.
'"
\\JOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Double D JUSTIFICATION.doc
"""'......... -
......",,",,'" ....
---
,.--
...-.-
c.-z
...""'^ --
-"-""
II, In I
¡aile 111:1 i
,115 111 11
¡It} t- III
~Iq ~II ~tf
tit! I !III} I~k
I'ld I" "11
II 11ï~ nUl ! ¡I~
It.
-'411 -
VINI~/: V\ ::!)lUNVUd
S.LN3V113J\O~dl^Jl 3.LIS
SÐNI010H )!OO~8ANNns
.... .
.... .
",
.~ \
. \.
./ .
.' z
~.
~I
. /' (/)
/~
./
I
ill
~.
~I
~nl
l!il
~I ~
I
. I
.
!
I ! .
I ;
¡ U I
! s I I
~
~
~
¡
bI.u
il f~~f
I .nl
c
-
I
-
.
I
J "HI t ¡Jlt
i i1 I, .11;lflll' . 'I hf'1~ Û t!Rlf ~l
I 1 1l I . 'IJ .ti: 1! ~!J~'1
I 11!1~1 Ilill;¡ t ! II ri¡f¡li !j11 I:~~H 1'1
i H 1- tllll! r.t la Id.Jal I ;ædill'l
~ I ~II 1~li 'I" ïii ¡i!dq¡ f~ I III ~
it I d!i! IwJ,:! ~ ~II ~tiJ ~I f 18,1&.j!
~-I
2;~~
<-':)or-
"""" ....,..
m C\/
l1Jæ<'
C<:(>,
~ u.. w'
t;;;" -7 I
0- ,..- --I
. .O~~
~~ ì:: I
:e~::>:
~~O
~(\ CC
Il)t-
F -I
?
.
.",
~
J ~
pi ~
,..J
7~
It 1-
pi 0
~ '"
Jt~
...
o.",j
u~
b
Z~Je
~~:;t---
(I)~Nc;)
Wa:<1.0
C~~>N
LL. - 0')
Z7~q>
0_-/0
O-V
Cf)!:!2j::BA.
:¡:æ::;:):I:
c(~OCL
-:I&J~.
'"
r - \
~
0
~
1,
0
J~~
UJO....
-~~
"'þ.~
~
D--
I3!i!JWI.O
.:ImZ!'--
~:3~~
cn:;E ~
W rr. « lO
C '.1: > ç:.
u -0)
;z..Wm
0 ~.. ::16
0 - '<:Ì"
(f) ~ > ~1..
:i:2i:!3:r:
..,...«OQ".
...... '""J rc
"""J~I-
)
U1
".
-,
~
"
It
UI
,4
F-
. ., L IJ t()
r.. Z I'
(I) :57 ..-
-.::t"..
. . ~ ,'-! '\-
(f ¡ 0..::: C')
III~«L{)
. fI I
(1.., ~N
l;~ .' -0)
. .,:., f.j 0)
1":, " J I
(",. ....JO
-,...~-'-.t
(/) ~9 r: ';:t')~
, 0...::: r :r:
I.~¿;::>'J
r c:( () u"
c:: .';} i:
. 'C'-! C-
o! ill f-
'"
t= .. I
16.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AppHcants name: Double D. Mini-Mart, Inc.
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2
Tax Map No 27.11-2-5
r--6)
County of Roanoke
Community Developm ênt
PlaIll1mg & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date rcc¡:ived:
Received by:
Application fee:
PCfBZA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
P a Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ,
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Placarcù issued:
BOS date:
Case Number
i~~:iifN.~r$.' ,....,' "." >..'
Chet:k type of application filed (check all that apply)
~ Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance
..,...'--........'..."..".............,........"".._,'.
0 Waiver
0 Administrative Appeal
ApplicantS name/address w/zip Phone:
Pinkerton Properties, LLC. Work: 725-8180
925 N. Electric Rd., Salem, VA 24153 Cell #:
ŒNf,ACf: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd., 24018 Fax No.: 772-0126
Owner's name/addres.S'w/zip
Pinkerton Prope~ties, L.L.C.
925 N. Electric Rd., Salem, VA 24153
ŒNfI>CT: Edward A. Natt 3912 Elec ic
Property Location
Northerly end of Byron Road
Phone #:
Work:' 725-8180
F~.No. #,: 772-0126
Magisterial District: Ca tawba
Community PlaDning area.:
Ho II ins
T~.M~fN8~6:~9-~i-ft~6.19-01-12.01 and E~ringZoning: Rl (12.01}/C2C (40)
Size of parcel(s): Acres:' ~~~o~bre~e I y Existing wd Use: vacant
;:~":"~~:"':~~:~~i~~~ f/$Æ' ¡~lf#fti!ij!jm~~tÌ¥i~~:.iiVjf~L~._:':-":~'._-- ~.- ~:, ~:~:,,'_._'~.~.~,..':_'~,.,,-=~,.,-~~,,:.'-
Proposed Zoning: R-4 (Residential Mllti-Family)
Proposed Land Use: Cons truct i on of 21 townhouses
'boes the parcel meet the IIrlnimum lot area, width, aDd frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the par~l meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rczomng rcquest, are conditions beìng proffered with this request? Yes No
~~i:àú!m~ ~ M£iiiii¡ij[liiii~1.ii.;ii.ijjj§~~' ::~2Œ.¡jý~i::~':~.[~j ,!;:~,.:, '::~" ._:L'.~~::~.~.~~~,~ :-":::,~~',::~
,Yes
No
VarWicefWaiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zotring Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Secticu(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Plcasc chet:k if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THES'
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOWLETE.
RlS/W V/AA Rlsrw V/AA RlSIW V/AA
00 Consultation ~ 8 112. x 11 . concept plan ~ Application fee
, X fpplicarlon X Metes md bounds description X Proffers. if applicable
. X !ustifica.tion Water and sewer application Adjoitring property owners
, I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purctlaser md am acting with the knowledge me:
consent ofehe owner. CMNER: ~nke'rClrlfìlð! L.L.C. ,-, ...,-------------
F-@...
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance. .
The property is presently zoned R-1 (036.19-01-12.01) and C2C (036.19-01-40). The proposed rezoning
to R-4, with proffers, would allow for the development of twenty-one (21) townhouses on the parcel of
land. The R-4 District is to provide for high-density development within the urban service area with
between twelve (12) and twenty-four (24) units per acre. The proposal for twenty-one (21) townhouses
within this parcel of land will fall within that criterion. As stated in the purposes of the R-4, the proposal
would serve as a buffer between less intensive (single-family residential) and more intensive (commercial)
uses. The proposal will provide for the development of twenty-one (21) units within five (5) clusters,
ranging in size from two (2) to five (5) units.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The property, as designated in the Community Plan, falls along the border of transition and neighborhood
conservation. Neighborhood conservation allows for attached housing at reasonable density that is not
significantly higher than the existing neighborhood. This. coupled with the buffer provisions, makes this a
reasonable use. A significant portion of the property remains undisturbed. Transition district provides for
single-family attached residential with not more than six (6) units per acre. The proposal falls within that.
criterion and, thus. is an appropriate use.
Please describe the irnpact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
waterlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
Public utilities are available within the immediate area and no significant burden will be placed upon the
public facilities of the County.
F:\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONiNG\Pinkerton Prop JUSTIFICATION REZONING.doc
f-~
PROFFERS
Address oLfuillíect Property:
Northerly end of Byron Drive
Tax Map No.:
Part of 036.19-01-40; Part of 36.19-01-12-01
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Pinkerton Properties, L.L.C.
PROFFERS
The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction
with the rezoning request: .
1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the
"Townhouse Development Concept Plan: 21 Townhouses With rezoning to R-4-
Townhouses," prepared by T. P. Parker & Son attached hereto.
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
BY
ITS
'"
\\JOll Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton Prop REZONING PROFFERS.doc
Page 1 of 1
8QQress of Subject Property:
Northerly end of Byron Drive
Tax Map No.:
Part of 036.19-01-40; Part of 36.19-01-12-01
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Pinkerton Properties, LLC.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
BEGINNING at a point at the northwest comer of Lot 12,
Block 18, Section 4, Montclair Estates (PB 10, PG 7); said
point being at the northeast corner of Byron Drive; thence S.
65° 00' 30" W. 191.02 feet to a point; thence N. 24° 55' 30" E.
180.31 feet to a point; N. 71° 19' 24" E. 57.68 feet to a point;
thence with a curved line to the right having a chord, bearing
and distance of S. 66° 48' 03" E. 200.26 feet, a distance of
219.26 feet to a point; thence S. 24° 55' 30" E. 7.07 feet to the
point and place of BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2:
BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of Lot 1,
Block 5, Montclair Forest, as said point intersects with the line
of Section 4, Montclair Estates; thence with the line of
Montclair Forest S. 71 ° 03' 00" W. 464.08 feet to a point;
thence with a new division line through the property of
Pinkerton Properties, LLC (Tax Map No. 36.19-01-40)
to a point; thence N. 71 ° 03' 00" E. 364.22
feet to a point; thence S. 24° 55' 30" E. 463.33 feet to the
point and place of BEGINNING.
'"
\\JOlL y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton REZONING lEGALdoc
r-~
,-
Page 1 of 1
1.27
-»8
2Þ211 - 1.4
41.
~
Ik
~
~
~
.~
ø
ì
\
I
\
\
i
I
I
I
I
1
38.
,.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Pinkerton Properties. L.L. C.
Proposed Zoning: Rezoning R4
Existing Zoning: R1 (12.1) / C2C (40)
Tax Map No Pt. of 36.19-1-12.1
and Pt. of 36.19-1-40
'"
~
~
IIf£A FOR ...-wA'IØ - POfI)
""",AI nCE""'" NOTf~'
I. 1HE PRcPOSED """""""IØ ............,., POND. lOCA1EP ON TAX NO. 036-"",,-12.1. - IlEPlAŒ 11IE
DIS1IHC STORWA"" u.oHAŒlŒNT POND. LOCA1ÐJ DN 'AX NO. OJ6.'9-Ð1-".
2. 1HE RELOCAl1CIt or 1HE POND - DECIIEASE 1NE "RAlE or FLOW'" AND 1NE - or 1IA""" lHAT
1RA'oÐS ACIIOSS LOT ... !EC1IDN .. uOll1l:LAlR £$JA1ES. 1NE S1JJRIIWAmt """' caAIfROAL 5I1ES or TAX
Nos. OJ6.1""01-11. ..... 031.1....--1 lOLL BE """""'" AWAY",,", 1>£ DIS1INØ """"""'" I'OINT.
,..,.,.,...,.19.' 11 Þt:f6 Œ RUIIOFf \!ILL BE - FROU 1NE ( p£ 0INtNEL FL"""" - 11£
fI£SII>EH1L'L LOTS. .... ""'" NOT caoS1l1\fÆ"'-- t.s 1NE ~...... IIf,\CH 11£ ...... CUlT""
POINT FOR 1>£ <MIlA!. ... oæ£ ..........., þP£J..
J. 1NE ~ ...-wAD U""""'OO POND. LCICAU Q 03I.1!H11-12." IS RECMR£!> 10 [
aJNSIRUC:I!I> fCO 11£ D<\Ð.!I'IÆHT Œ 1>£ Y" 00. _19-0H2.1 -1I£.IE""""" pe I1IQI or Y"
No. _1"""'" )IO.IOOQ<E tcuITt. II 1\£ PASr. "AS IIE<IJESm) lHAT DE'Æ1Ø'IJIS CQISUOJC1 0EQCtIAL
,"',......"" uNIAŒUENT POND FOR UIA.1P\L DE'ÆLCIPJÆI(1S. .
.. '1!£ """"""'" SttJIOIWAD ............... POND ...... """"""'" 10 AN LN:J<RGR<1,IID IIWOAŒ PFE.
OA1>£R ""'" ÞSCHAROE 10 AN ...... O<NINEL 1>£ PIIOPOSED POID ...... O£T'" .... ""'1£ or FLDW" '0
UŒt 1111: 0JfIIIDC'! - c:øm sr_ARDS. '!HE HJ.DWAIU .....1£ or FL<1fI' IS !!.<SED Q 11£ [JOS1ING
FLOW aJNDI11QIS RAl1O ....... '"' PRDI'CI!D FLOW aJNII11CRs. ..................... 1HE - ,.,..,
1iU _Go: ^' A .AlE c.><.cU.}.1EP 'CII 20 JaŒS or ÐIWIACE (fJaSlINO .......... MfA) RA1NEJt 1}INI
A RAl£ CALQJU.1ÐJ FOR ..... ,. JaŒS or ...........,. (PRa'OS£Ð """"""" N<£J: .
f!JJJfJ$JJm IIf£A ZONE]) R1
"" '" If
....
:zoo' ,- - "'"
........ -..:
EJCHI T Ø'
STORUWA TE:R UANAGÐÆNT POND
fOR
11
...... ø::..J.a.
......----UL.
...... ø .-Nt.
.. , ---
.. --""'L
- --.-L
¡
f)J
T. P. PJ!!DS IE 801<
,.........
--...-
---
"':"" "='"
r- -~
(/)
w
(/)
:J
f- 0
Z I
~ ~
g, F=~.
-' ;:'0
~ (/)'<ta:¡
WZW~
O<{(/)Oll
W-'5f-:
(/)0.. ~
:Jf-Ic..?
0 0.. ~:?; ..
J:WOZ~
~~f-2<{
oo~~g
f-()N~
0
\
\
H H
PI
------
--,
I
I
----
-.--.--.--.--.
--
'"
. ' ,
F-,3
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
Received by:
Applicaûon fee:
PCIBZA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, V A 24018-0798 ,
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
::::~¡iL'~~,:;.;:,:;,::::::,::',.. ,
t,,~APP,dCmTS
J,:~.":::,~~,.:;:,.,,;,':(',:'.'.,.,._',,,,'
Placards issued:
BOS date:
Case Number
, -., .'......'
.,."....".'. ,.",'. - ,'. ..'. ,.' '.,'.
. , ..... ....
..,',. .
. ,..." ... ,
.,'...-..,. '.'
Check type of application flied (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning ~ Special Use 0 Variance
Applicants name/address w/zip .
Pinkerton Properties, L.L.C.
925 N. Electric Rd., Salem, VA 24053
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd.
0 Waiver
0 Admillistrarive Appeal
Phone:
Work: 725-8180
Cell #:
24018 FuNo.: 772-0126
Owner's name/address wlzip
Pinkerton Properiies, L.L.C.
925 N. Electric Rd., Salem, VA 24153
ŒNTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd., 24018
Property Location
2820 Byron Drive Magisterial District: ¿tawba
Phone #:
Work: 725-8180
FaxNo.#-: 772-0126
Community Planning axea.:
, 0
ins
Tax Map No.: Part of 036.19-01-12.01
Existing Zoning:
R1
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1 acre, roore or 'I ess Existmg Land Use: vacant
~:.~:'.~:~"'.':' :;~':¥::¥e~.~fu rt$~:j?~~i1:~:!r.~~~Œ.~i:(#íjjm,,:_.,:': .~'-~:.,.._:,.~,~:.._~,~..:~.:..'.~-'~,...~~-~-~,~,','"
Proposed Zoning: R-1
Proposed Land Use: najor ut i J i ty faci I i ty, i.e., stornwater management pond
'boes the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?
IF NO, A V AlUANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No N I A
i!~1ijji~~ ~~ ~~àiw.~m.j?ii.:~iiiJjij":ii~~~~~.':~';':J .1 ~:~~.,:, .~:~, ,~L~:~,,~ ~.:~~~,.." :":.:,:c:~:':.:~.
Yes
No
-
Va!"ÍMlceIWaiw:r of Secrlon(s)
of the Roanoke County Zomng Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Adminirtrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Secrlon(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please. check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RJSIW V/AA RlSfW V/AA RJSfW V/AA
00 Consultation E§i 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee
. X Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application Adjoilling property owners
. I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the: owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge: aDd
consent of the owner. CMNER: ~~nk on P rt~~ L.L.C. . -.. -----.--..-----.----
ç-- 3
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, LLC.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The provisions of the R-1 District allow for major utility service facilities. The stormwater facility proposed
for this property has been determined to be a major utility facility by the County. The stormwater
detention pond will replace the existing stormwater detention pond on the adjoining tract of Pinkerton
Properties, LL.C. The relocation of the pond will decrease the rate of flow and volume of water traveling
across certain properties within Montclair Estates and, therefore, will be a benefit to the residential
development. Additionally, the stormwater detention will be re-routed away from the existing discharge
point and will benefit a number of residential lots. Such does not constitute diversion, as the run-off will
reach the same out fall point for the overall drainage area.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The proposed use will be in furtherance of the Community Plan in that it will provide for improved
stormwater run-off for residential as well as commercial properties, consolidating stormwater
management for an area into one pond. The Applicant will be responsible for continued maintenance of
the stormwater detention pond in conjunction with its ownership of the properties along Route 419. The
development will be an improvement to the overall stormwater management system within the area and
will provide the opportunity for better utilization of the commercial properties along Route 419.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
There will be no adverse impact on County facilities other than an improvement in stormwater
management for the entire area.
'"
\'JOLl y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton Prop JUSTIFICATION SP USE.doc
8QQress of Subject Property:
2820 Byron Drive
Tax Map No.:
Part of 036.19-01-12.01
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Pinkerton Properties, LLC.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING at a point at the northwest corner of Lot 12,
Block 18, Section 4, Montclair Estates (PB 10, PG 7); said
point being at the northeast corner of Byron Drive; thence N.
24° 55' 30" W. 7.07 feet to a point; thence with a curved line
to the left having a chord, bearing and distance of N. 66° 48'
03" W. 200.26 feet and a distance of 219.26 feet to a point;
thence S. 71° 19' 24"'W. 57.68 feet to a point on the easterly
line of Tax Map No. 36.19-01-12.01; thence with the same N.
24 ° 56' 04" W. 17.65 feet to a point; thence with the lines of
the property of Timothy M. and Jeanna M. Murphy (Tax Map
No. 36.19-01-12) N. 66° 27' 32" E. 188.59 feet to a point;
thence N. 1 r 54' 24" W. 87.94 feet to a point; thence N. 26°
15' 21" E. 26.35 feet to a point on the westerly line of Lot 1,
Block 18, Montclair Estates; thence with the same S. 66° 58'
09" E. 338.59 feet to a point; thence S. 04° 03' 09" E. 33.06
feet to a point; thence S. 65° 00' 06" W. 243.82 feet to the
point and place of BEGINNING.
~
\\JOLL y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton SP USE LEGAL-doc
r- -3
Page 1 of 1
1.27
-ð'/!tf
ð':!S1 -1.4
41.
~
~..
C'I
>
>
1,
1"'-
..
t
40.
Zoning: C2C
~
..
...
<II
I
I
\
\
\
1
\
I
I
¡
!
i
3B.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Pinkerton Properties,
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: R1
Tax Map No Pt. 36.19-1-12.1
L.L. C.
""'"
~
~~
~
F-3 .
(/)
w
(/)
I- :J
Z 0
W :r:
~ I~
0 1-0
...J ~ 1-'
Wi'
> (/)~O
WZWe:::CC
O«(/)
W...J:JOII
(/)0..01-.
:JI-I,-,'-
Oo..;;<:Z
IW~z- ..
ZUOOw
3:ZI- ....J
~8N~~
;0
rI'
..-
U1
(..)
C1\
0
\
0
-
OJ
5
~
(]'I
-
.-
-
-
..,,~
o~
:::0-1
G}P
-I~
:::0
-
-
- - -.--.--.--.--.
-
-.-.-----.-.
, ,
{=-LÌ
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
..., .', u... ,..,..,."..'
Received by:
DH.
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
PC~ date;
~'
:j('"':-"'" /iJ!i~1~iif$ . .
Ch~ck type of applica~n fJled (check all that app1y)
0 Rezoning IIt'Special Us~ 0 Variance
., . ,...'.. .. .. ..,', ..~,.... ,..' ". , ..."','. ..,
....,.. ,...".. ",-,.."...
".>..."'.
. ..,..' .'. ". .....,."--,,..
0 Waiver
0 Administrative Appeal
Owner's name/address whip
/ùJ HÆ/-b Þ4uY/:z{P:£
J.$ 7 g d.4Jl.U f' /) It.
A()AHbP-~ vA ~ /1
Property Location
ß /lc,,¡U:z:J.t. A.;;f77) .sA-lr~
!e7/1 ~.t'"otV A.b.
ð ~ ¥ø
Tax Map No.: ,J.7,J"g-/-/, I /,~
Phone: ~t..14 ¿ - 71.7')
Work: /7vð. .Ja~~1'/fl
Cell #: .
Fax No.: ~) .1~.L-9~<g'~
Phone #: ~6 ..?CJ",-7'l75
Work: ~ .J(j2..~11 J
Fax No. #:ft..6-';¿j!.-'~
Applicants name/address WI. z~a . ^_.,J -A¡(. If/I. .-A.... ^~ 'A.-...
.~f' bo~t,4(! :PJFlJ~.;pye- ff/1 f!J'#CfO~ ~
. ~ 7fY' ~:r4i'J.t C>H tlP., .
,P..."4H.~#'VA :~/f .
Magisterial District:
ff () L t.:r}./..i
Community Planning an:a: Jfð l.-l.:SEN..r
ExLsting Zoning:
d-:2 .Ç
. -;-- - .
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: Existirlg Land Use: AM7P#r~l.JZ:Z.£ b ~ìf-:zP ¡.(,,(j
::-.:'z~'~':;':i~M;,~r~.df# q$~..fßlf!1Jiij!l'!f.Ø!:;~~~~~~~~?m. .:. ..::.;~'~---~.,:,...:,.,.:.:,:'.,.._.~.::.~..:~.~:,....~~:.~.:....~._...".....
..('PEà;:;4-L Jj(P £ 'J:1::!r
Proposed Zoning: J
Proposed Land Use: ,,()..~~'. ~~ ~ 10 (,I1f/t5.
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
~ . No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQumED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? (fiiJ No
IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are condhions being proffered with this request? Yes No N Ý4
~t_1ij,:,i.#ÿ$.~ Ä!è:. m~iYI~.mi~~iÆ~iS~""':':""'-'..if.Œljf~~'.:':...! '\""~~":.'~:~ .._-.,:;~~'._~ ,,~~~:.~~:"'..:..:~;:,:.,~~
flA
VariancelWaiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke Cm1D.ty Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Secûan(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning OrdlnaDce
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION Wll,L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RJSfWV/AA RlSfW V/AA RJS/W V/AA
EE Consultation Eii B 1/2" x 11" concept plan EB Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers. if applicable
Justification Wa.rer and sewer application AdjoiIrlng property owners
. r:::::. = ~~ ~tl", tht 0","" of tho "'"Port¡> ~O~ge",~ pm'clw"... om -. willi tho knowl"'" ""
~ Owner's Signature
')
~~~:~~#~~iON FORl<EZd~G~..~~:~~~Y~'~~~~#'~~..~~~~":.:. ,', :.: .'.::.... '::.~.~~~{:'::..:.."~
--Applicant ~A'-I. j)tlr;.¡;LA.f.1J13:!1J.~;B1L r.-Øl J~tJlð!;f:./JE A-urð ~4--L.-£J
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to dßtermine the need and justification for
the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
AUDWd :z:d <L-.2 2-t:ÞH~~
¡J '/ ~/>Æ.J¿--W/-L- rAS'Æ p¡;JLJ~
D:£f~
\o~rs.. -
<5:> WJ.)f {vJ>-..!.c.~r /\,AJJJ \ (j (.. (y S ~
~ ,¡ -,.
A~. , j",-. I ::L2 (.:;';.~'~.jYS C1 ~r&
u ((;.1<-' l~.."""-. ,
, Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
- Plan.
fJ~~LL dÞ~b1£ 7?J gE
bN' ~rr W~ '7JIÆ ~ ¡:¿fJÞ.)r tÆ.~li'
éJ.F 7;-f¿ Pfl-ð;£p'-rT;;Lé..r J;Z:;// 771~ AfJ.M". .I!T
~L.L f' Or /JJ--V!Z;47£ ¡:::.ÇL¡,M !LaA-r/o¡¿/-
¿'urlr'Ý J' d-ot1 þ/2fJI-f=.NfJJ:.v£ PLA/-h/.,
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoiDing properties, and the surrounding area, as wßll
as the impacts on public services and facilities, including warerlsewer, roads, Sc.hObls, parkslrecreatioD and fire and rescue.
7#£ PM p~ rI ~ LL
M ~JE X::¡Vj P AÂr:r
P ()o ~J A-// /J ~
r1-f/ f II ~ jJ A-d- r ð?l
H4V£
)-If!;
~
C') N 77;;: £. ..s: ~</2tl..ð !.{ N Þ:::CH ~
~ H IJ r I-f--A- V£
PJ111 ~ SÆfl- v~
~
~
rI;#!~~~ifiöN~OR ~~.dt~~~Ä~'.d'-..."-_._.:'.'...~--'..:"'.':' .."."-""".,-'".' .'..".'-"'.'...."'-"'.¥-~'<) ,."".1
'- Applicant
Th~10IDDg Appeals is re~uired by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a
varlånce can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets
each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. ï
1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and, Pi' cse of the
Zoning Ordinance.
I
/
2. The strict appli~ation of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a ha¡;áship that approaches c.oDflscation (as
distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or umea.{onably restrict the use of the property.
3. The hardship is not shared by other properties ÎD the s e zoning district or viciIDty. Such hardships shoul d be addressed
by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zo . g Ordinance.
4. The variance will no!Óe of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district.
Å
-nu,..
l~~i~Ù~~~N FOR AD~~~:~~~~.~~tI~..::_~u..--_u.~~:_, .
......_.u......,,-_..u~.tu~.4. ..
Applicant
Please respond to me following as thoroughly as possib1e. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. Reasons for appeal:
f
/
/
"
2. Evidence supporting claim:
//
/
/
,/
/
/
/'
/
/
. .//-
'"
-)
~----
.",..,_.,-",."_....."..,.,,,~.....,.,f:~.,~J. .,.
I
.--~~'~~~~~!f.~~m,cIrËcn~ST. "~.,...~'.':":.~,:_:.,,._,~_..,.. '~........ -.
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
hmd use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land us or
design. issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to r t the
future use and development of the property and by so doing, COlTect any defic.iencbs that may not be manageable by ounty
pe:rm.itt1ng re gulatio ns.
The CODcept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance f a building
prnnit. Site plan and building permit procedmes ensure compliance with State and County development regu, !ions and may
require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezo . g or imposed on
a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zo' district and other
regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use perinit, waiver and variance applica: ODS. The plan should be
prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the natur of the request. The COUllty
Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, b t the following are considered
minimum:
c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
d. Location, IlaD1~ of owners and Roanoke County tax map n bers of adjoining properties
e. Physical features s'Uch as ground cover, natural waterc ses, floodplain, etc.
f. The zoning and land 'Use of all adjacent properties
- g. All property lines and easements
h. An buildings, existing and proposed, and
i. Location, widths and names of all exis' or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
- j. Dimensions and locations of all dri ways, parking spaces and loading spaces
ALL APPLICANTS
a. Applicant D.211le and name of development
b. Date, scale and north arrow
Additional information requíredfor ONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
- k. ExisÙ1lg utilitie, ~er, storm dnfus) and connectioDS at the ,ite
- 1. Any driveways entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
m. Topograph map in a suitable scale and coD1ollI intervals
D. Appro ate street grades and site distances at intersections
o. Lo tions of all adjacent fire hydrants
- p. AJ1y proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
- q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule
I ceTtìfy that all items required in the checklist above are complete.
'"
Signature of appl1cant
Date
r:.
. ,6'~'
I 39.24 . ~
I ---
I . .---
. ---
. ..-.
1._--
r '\13.5'
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, --
, 21 -.6. ----- ,
, ----- ~
<.0- --r - - . "-.J
\ \ 1 7 "20 . ~ " .
~ '\ ~
y~ \ '
, " , 7 '
" \ ' . 6704 ,
16 ' 8 '\ '
" . ,
\, ',18', ~
\, \ ,55 ....
\ , ' -- ,
121' , , ' -----
\' , 6 \ ..--- .
'\ ' - - - .
. ~. ~ ...--~ /'
~\:>, .....,- ,53 31.42 ,
'\ . ~.'" \ 1 (") 6630 ~
, ,
\ '
, \
I '
,
\ \
} \
I
)
~./..
\ \, \ \
\ ,\ .
" \ ~
.
\ l\ ~
'\ ~
. ,
\ ,
, ,
I ~
.
I ~
\ ~
,_.
.
,
,
3
5
\
1.
--
. ---
--
--
--
--
--
15
6811
2
~
~
--
--
--
~------0 !
3.
4
6717
6.
6711
"
\
1.
-'
--
, --
->---¡
U' 6707
/
I
~9. :? <f. --------
10
"21 3.
:1 1:1
2. 13.
6!l1:1 2
18 128
12.
1:J2
6!l1l5 1. 1A
Deer
1.
~Q
""-$
/4:J
3.
4.
~
~
,
'a
~
!J
i.
Føød /Jon
66/6
15.
14.
,.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Jerry Douglas
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2C
Tax Map No 27.tB-t-q.t,5.2
Kidd. Inc.
\...
1 '.
(
(,,';
\=-5
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Cue Number
..~o- ,~.._....... " , "..",d.. """""""""-""""""""""""""""""""",..",,,~
';,¡.'~~' " ':,:~_::~,,~-:o,'o-'~":""':",:.,1,::t;';.'~,.,,~.'o,:o,:,':00,:'"~'." "-. ,, '
-.. .. ' ."", ",',,', ',.. .-, " ',:"..." .., """, " .."."..,.. ,..
Appüc:arloIl fee:
ð .ðÒ
Placards issued:
,,',"',' ",... "",
, ., ' .... ,"'"
Check type of applica.~on filed (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning ItSpecial Use 0 Variance:
Applicants name/addr~ss w/zip i. ,- - :<.' '
Virl¡Ík'\ìa.- p(;.s. AlI(Clr'\l~), f....,(;.. ðb~ NæUí,. ,
\lø .s\'\I~n{'lndc,Q{k "¡\\~~~', Ç)~ ,
\r.Jc. <\(s.~~ý~ ,vA ~V~ ~ C- I) Jt>sìt..- \!~¡\y\o'\e.r-
0 Waiver
0 Administrative Appeal
Phone: ,>'"'10 .îQ I . b~i b - ,
Work: 5Ctmc..' '" , "
Cell #: 51-10. 24,( --.$~Ci "
'"
, FuND.: 'PfC-"J32. -:Z-2,./c
Owner's n.ameladdress w/zip, - Phone #: 5t-Io - 381- (:02. c Ù
~(1f\f \!.e.-- ect.l.J\+t (]ðc::tl--cL C"f- 5..) p<,rl!'l~OIi Work: f)t'\I"-'<'- '
r.o.ß~f l--4¡'OÓ I 1\ d, t- . FuNa. #: 5Llo-.3-Bl--(¿;,/I ~
l2,oC¡i1c:~e \/ A z.y' 0 (.. (;.. ,D . I\r,\¿' V\m", t. v¡rt¿1î .!
Property Location . Ma' 'a1 D" IL î \. <;
ftv'l\i n f:. Rt '7C.t-1 c.. S~~ f¡ é-"l-:¡ì- S- glSten !SIDet: '1ìL \ Y\.
1tiOr 1Þc,¡m~\.s RJ . CommUDity pI"....;,.,.. area:
12..o~n.ðl..t A 2. 0.11 ~
Tax Map No.: tl":L'"'t-,lb -t:.ti -ól ,bO.-DeOo ExistingZomng: C7-
Size ofpaxcel(s): Acres; -z.,.>1 t(c.-- Existing LandUse: p¡,t\., l ¡ v -R.e. S~(.A. e- S-þ,,-\-) ~.~
:'~6.~~;:::~;":'-;;':"::':m",.'~,,~RMtriiii~,~,,~,~:'-"~-â~&>'::',:,"::..,,' """","'.'-"'., '-'00"",",-"'" ,,""
X§F.};;.;l¡!§li.:§l:~,þ~, :.:: Hß.Æ. r~o ';.~7; ,:::,~~;:;;:"~~,:¿'~~~':.::l~,,:;,;,:;:,;~,",~qE~~û¥1. -..:':..:- ""'" ..:,.,.._~.,..,._.. .,-_.,--'._.,-~-"--_.._~ .
Proposed Zoning: NiA
Proposed Land Use: iZe let C-tt'V'\u\.t \-e-! e. co~ 1")'\ u I1l LC>I-h~f\ s fv¡,c.t II
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and froDtage requirements of the: requested district?
@ 'No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST, . .
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? 6J' . No , .
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoDing request, are con~hions being proffered with this request? ' Yes No ' '. '
""-""'1".,.,..._-" -"..',-.".., ," ".",' """'-""'-"""'~"',^,-"",,"'."""~""""--"""""""">":""",,,,,~,,:""""""""""""'o" "'0' -0"""".."'-"""0 ",_,,""h."'"
>~: " ~i,:,}~;,W'~~~:M?œm~~{f~/~liid'Iw.m(~. :::,~ol:'~'~':~~"_:;o~';.o~-~_",,<.~i~"¿~~>:
, '
, '
Variance/Waiver of Sectíon(s)
of the Roanoke CO'UIlty Zoning OrdinaDce in order to: '
, Appeal of Zonm.g Adnún.istrator's decision to
. Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):
Appeal of InterpretAtion of Zoning Map to
oithe Roanoke County Zonm.g Ordlnmce
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLlCA TION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RiSfW V/AA RiSIW VIM 'RlSIW V/AA. '
m CoIlSllltation ~ 8 1/2. x 11. conc:pt plan ~ Applica.tion fee " '
Application" Metts and bounds œscription ;.¡ f\' Proffers, if a.pplicable ' :
</ JUStification WatM and sewer application Adjommg property owners
I hereby certify that I un either the D~r of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the blowledge and'
CDDEent of the owner. C\~v- ¿, LA)£t-....<..A.. Owner' s Sign.a.tUr~
/
.,
", , .
J;j::;':,;.',.i... ,.~. -'...,.
BROADCASTING TOWERS AND ASSOCIATED ANTENNA PERMITTED BY RI(;HT:
. New and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in, height
and located within any commercial or industrial zoning dis1rict provided: .
a) the proposed tower is a monopole type design: . .
b) the general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including
electric power and telephone poles: and
c) all other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated
facilities are met. '. .' '. '
'" Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the' County provided said , antenna qoes not meet
the definition of á broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing strucfuie more Ülan'ten
(10) feet, and does notresuIt in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that
zoning district. , . .
". Tern 0 towers erected for a eriod not to exceed twen -one da 's.
The following information shall be required as part of the Special Use Permit for a Broadcast Tower in
addition to standard application requirements. J, .
Proposed Site Qualities
Utilities that are current! resent on site:
Utilities required that are not currently present on site:
Ex ected route of linka e:
-~
~
~
Estimated noise level in decibels:
Broadcast Tower
Structure Type: ~oPole
0 Other (descri tion)
Proposed height of tower excluding antenna:
mattice Tower
dJ]Guyed Tower
¡tj]Ste~lth Design (description)
i q q (
Existing height of s1mounding tree canopy and/or buildings:
Construction material and finish of tower: Specific tower location
Material: b,J. L/I\M. t"-z,e.,; Finish: thcJ1íe... Longitude: 0 "
Ground Elevation in mean sea level of the proposed tower site:
Latitude:
,0
"
Tower has structural ability to accommodate:
s s of Antenna or Other Devices Attached to Tower
Omni-Directional Antenna Directional Panel Parabolic Antenna
0 Other
Material and finish ofthe proposed antenna(s).
Material: Finish:
dJ]Whip Ant~a
Dimensions of Antenna(s)-heightJwidthl epth
/ I '
1
...." .
(-,. (:
The following information must be submitted separately in either a written oi rnapped format. f - 5
OJ Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicant's existing communication system including
number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site.
0 A map designating the specific coverage area(s) desired with any overflow areas denoted separately.
0 A list, with a map, of all the alternative sites considered or evalUated to serve the area ofthis proposed tower,
including other existing tower sites in the vicinity. This should include any co-locations considered and the
. specific technical, legal or other reasons the other site(s) were rejected.
õI Provide conceptual site plan drawn to scale, depicting the location of support structures, equipment enclosures,
landscaped areas, fences, lighting, access, limits of disturbed land, average slope of the site, ownership and use of
adjoining properties, etc.
0 Provide accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the'relationship of the proposed broadcast tower
and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations should include the relationships of any new.
or modified road or utility corridors necessary to servè the' proposed broadcast tower site. ' '
õI Provide computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the prop~sed broadcast tower and antenna at
the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility conidors are proposed, the terrain
analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. .
õlProvide detail sheet for broadcast tower structure. .f'
õI Provide an accurate description and photograph of the proposed tower structure, fu.c1uding antenna.
0 Provide detail sheet of any antenna or devises attached to toyver including elec1rical and mechanical
specifications for antenna systems. '
Notes:
-ell Sw({~ fr~ ~ 1
~ 'YI( (,'v~h
1tJ +-'ek s ..y -T f"M¡ ~ ¡ ( ~
{de-. $ f rr-, I ~i 7 sv'- "- ~
W1V.}. & e,. ~ - '7f l:"A.7 > , w-tfi.1<- --I-t.~)
Cr. rr ì 4"' , f / v.f, (;.0 v d \ de."... Iv-- ¿
..., t¡(CVlt~ ~~"'~'1 w.-e.æ.;.(
I hereby certify that:
ø All required submittals to the FAA, as required by Zoning Ordinance Section 30-87-2D. 6, have been
submitted.
II' A required on-site balloon or comparable test will be peiformed on the dates of
Planning Commi:;sion public hearing scheduledfor , and on the dates of
for the Board of Supervisors public hearing scheduled for
ø I, the applicant, shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application, including !he
reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the County to verify the need for the new
broadcast tower.
for the
Signature:
Date:
'"
2
--
)=-5
1150 Shenandoah Vntage Drive
Waynesboro, Virginia 22980
Fax (540) 932-2210
June 21,2004
County of Roanoke
Department of Community Development
Mr. David Holladay, Zoning Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
RE: Special Use Pennit application - RN322 Peters Creek telecommunications facility
Dear Mr. Holladay:
Please accept the attached application for special use permit by Virginia PCS Alliance,
LC. (dba "NTELOS") for a new telecommunications facility located at the Hollins
Rescue Station #5, 7401 Barrens Road, Roanoke (tax parcel 27.13-04-01.00-000) on
property owned by the Board of SupeI:Visors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. The
parcel contains 2.51 acres and is zoned C2. NTELOS is requesting approval to construct
a 199 foot monopole and a telecommunications facility compound. Currently, there is an
existing 100 foot monopole located on the property and used by Roanoke County. If
approved, NTELOS will remove the existing monopole and relocate the Roanoke County
communications equipment ITom the existing monopole and from the building to the new
monopole and within the compound. T Mobile has also committed to NTELOS to
collocate on the new monopole and within the compound.
Below are explanations addressing the provisions outlined in the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance as well as the Pre-Application Checklist.
The following are Application Standards set forth in Section 30-87 -2 (C)2 of the Zoning
Ordinance:
A & B) The search ring objective for NTELOS is to provide fill-in coverage
along Rt. 117 (peters Creek Rd.), south of the intersection of Rt. 11 (Williamson
Rd.) and Peters Creek Rd. The sites considered and rejected by NTELOS
included collocating on the existing Hollins Rescue Station monopole which was
not structurally capable of the additional loading and did not meet height
requirements. Other sites rejected included a new monopole at the First Team
Auto Mall property, the Gary L. Johns property (027.10-07-04.00-0000) which is
a small vacant lot behind the old Pizza Den, and the industrial area along Hitech
Rd. All these sites would meet our coverage objectives at the proposed height of
199 feet; however, NTELOS took into consideration the County's goal of
'"
F-5
reducing the number of tower sites and decided to work with Roanoke County at
the Hollins Rescue Station to replace the existing 100 foot monopole with a new
monopole. Thereby benefiting the County's communications network, as well as
allowing the collocation possibility to other interested carriers. NTELOS also
contacted the Roanoke Regional Airport regarding the possibility of collocating
antennas on its new radio control tower, but they were not interested in working
with telecommunications carriers.
C) Attached are photo simulations of the proposed monopole. Photos were taken
from Oakley's Funeral Home property and across from First Team Auto Mall.
The proposed monopole site location will not require any new or modified road,
access or utility coITidor from BaITens Rd. The monopole will be accessed by the
existing parking lot used by the Rescue Station.
D) Attached is a computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the
proposed tower at the requested height and location. No additional road, access
or utility conidors are proposed.
E) The proposed site will provide coverage along Rt. 117 (Peters Creek Rd.)
from the intersection ofRt. 117 and Rt. 11 (Williamson Rd.) south to Interstate
581 and to the Roanoke Regional Airport. This site is sandwiched between the
NTELOS site at Tinker Mountain to the north, its AEP collocation site on
Interstate 81 to the south and the Friendship Manor Retirement Home rooftop
collocation to the southeast. NTELOS currently has ninety-seven (97) sites
within its Roanoke Market (from Wytheville to Lexington) including twenty-nine
(29) sites in Roanoke County and Roanoke City.
F) NTELOS and T Mobile will conduct on-site balloon tests prior to the planning
commission and board of supervisor hearings on the special use pennit on dates
provided by Roanoke County Zoning.
G) Attached is the FAA detennination in which the proposed site received a
determination of "No Hazard to Air Navigation" and will not require marking or
lighting.
The following are General Standards requirements set forth in Section 30-87-2 (D) of
the Zoning Ordinance:
1. The maximum heiwt of the proposed monopole and antenna shall not exceed
199 ft. in height. Propagation maps showing coverage intervals of 25 ft are
included for NTELOS and T Mobile. The 195 ft. antenna rad center for NTELOS
and 185 ft. antenna rad center for T Mobile clearly show the needed height to
provide adequate coverage. Roanoke County will be moving their
communications equipment from the existing monopole to the 165-175 ft and
145-155 ft levels on the new monopole thus increasing their height. The County
requires the proposed monopole must accommodate an additional 3
'"
F-5
carriers/vendors besides the applicant. Additional carrier/vendor collocation
opportunities at the proposed site will be available.
2. & 3. The monopole site compound meets the fifty (50) foot front yard setback
along Barrens Rd. and the twenty five (25) foot setback along all other property
lines. The proposed monopole is more than the 40% (79.6 ft.) of the height of the
monopole away from the nearest residence on the adjoining lot to the NW of the
rescue station property.
4. The existing monopole on the property is to be dismantled and removed per
the County's request.
5. A determination of "No Hazard to- Air Navigation" was received £rom the
FAA and is attached. No marking or lighting is required.
6. The detennination received £rom the FAA has been routed through local
regional offices of the FAA prior to issuing the "No Hazard" determination.
7. The proposed site does not lie within the airport overlay or emergency
communications overlay districts.
8. The monopole will be designed to accommodate at least three (3) other
carriers/vendors in addition to the applicant. Attached is a Letter of Intent from T
Mobile to collocate at the 185 ft. level and Roanoke County will be located on
this tower at the 145-155 ft. and 165-175 ft. levels. Additional lease/collocation
opportunities are available.
9. The proposed site will be a monopole design.
10. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and NEPA Checklist has been
completed on the proposed site. A copy of the reports may be submitted,if
needed.
11. In the event ofterminationlabandonment of the proposed site, NTELOS
agrees to remove the monopole and facilities from the property. However, in the
event ofterminationlabandonment by NTELOS, the proposed lease between
Roanoke County and NTELOS allows for the purchase of the monopole site by
the County. NTELOS requests that if the Special Use Permit is approved, the
permit be transferable.
12. The proposed monopole shall be flat matte finished galvanized steel. The
compound will be fenced and landscaped.
13. No business signs will be located on the property except those required by
the FCC to properly identify the tower owner and those signs to identify
individual carrier equipment.
'"
F-5
In conclusion, NTELOS feels the approval of a special use permit for a new monopole
telecommunications facility at this location not only demonstrates the willingness of
cairiers to work together on collocation opportunities, but also allows for improvement to
the Roanoke County communication system by increasing their opportunities for future
growth by moving its equipment from the existing monopole and building roof to the new
monopole location. The County will also receive revenue from the proposed site.
Although a new monopole is proposed, NTELOS will remove the existing monopole
from the property allowing for an even exchange for the number of tower sites in the
vicinity, while creating collocation opportunities for other carriers. NTELOS has proven
that it makes its best effort to find collocation opportunities. Of the twenty-nine (29)
NTELOS telecommunications sites in Roanoke County and Roanoke City, only one (1)
tower is owned by NTELOS. We have demonstrated a history of choosing collocation
sites over building new sites if available - 5 rooftops, 8 transmission tower collocations,
1 billboard, 3 water tanks and 11 collocations on other carrier/vendors towers. The site
will be served by the existing parking lot of the rescue station and will be served by
utilities at Barrens Road. There were no other available structures within the vicinity of
suitable height, design and location to provide NTELDS or T Mobile needed service in
this area. The Peters Creek Road corridor has been developed largely by commercial
activity keeping the proposed site consistent with the commercial and service related
development already occurring in this area.
Please accept this application submittal along with required attachments. Please feel free
to contact me at 540-941-3610 or by email at wilmerj@ntelos.com if you have any
questions or concerns. I look forward to working with you.
Sincerely, -.
~LJ~
Jessica 1. Wilmer
NTELOS Network Coordinator
Enclosures
'"
\
Zoning C2
C.O.
2.
8")(5.
REDUCER
~2.
'"
Applicants name:Virginia PCS Alliance,
L.C. dba .Ntelos
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2
Tax Map No 27.13-4-1
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
----Jr./
/?-
~@
.....
""'~.fl)-
"-!.~
.....
"
"
~
.....
.....
pAJIICING LOT
I
I
!'-/
/7
Iì
I
0 ~~1~~~
/
~
"
.....
~
.....
.....
l
~
.r
I
I
b/ 1 T-Uoeu 87ETS
12' . 18' T-UOOl!
l£AS£ AREA I
'T-IIOI!IU:
4' PVC tQNDLI1 pþ¡o
r PIIC C,~~1Ð.CO
T-UOIIl£ ocr ï
I
I
/
*
"fl"r'
~ ~
_EST PCCNT WITII
$:':;~A~iii5O"
$~V~~~'1
Nmos ANTENNAS
T-I (JIllLE ANTENNAS
( IIOAHOIŒ COUNTY EllEf!C;£NC'I
5 SE.A"C£ ..... ANTENNAS
ELEYAT1QN 1089.50"
2 MONOPOLE ELEVATION
5-2 SCAL[, N.T.S
"
~~,..._...
\T8101 I =:t -
4
4 .14;
4r ~f
¡Md.
.c
~
~
~
¡
..
t
oj
11
III
.os ..
" Ë
~t'lt
0: 4111
! :1,
:. !Ii;
'" .................- .....
...... ME" -.oN"""'"
..,..",""""......."'-
...... .. ....... ...... .. .... . .
~
~
......
a~Ji..... PEl ""...
-"....-..-..
... "" " .. .... ... lIS ..........
"""""""""""......-...,
.. """"...- ...,-
..... .. ...... -.. .....
- .. J. FlAXMAN
""""" '" J RENO
I""'" -
PETER'S
CREEK
[...-
RN322
1- .......
HOlliNS FIRESTAtJON
7401 BARRENS RO~
ROANOKE, VA. 24018
ISMŒf 1m!
SITE PLAN
AND ELEVATION
SMŒf .......
5-2
[P.o, Wûo
,.,.
Ç"-LP
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
For Staff Use Dmy
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108
Date received: Received by:
Application fee: PCIBZA date:
Placards issued: BOS date:
Case Number
ALL APPLICANTS ,
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning ø Special Use 0 Variance
Applicants name/address whip Phone:
George Golf Design, Inc.
Lester George, President Work: 804-272-4700
609 Twinridge Lane Cell #:
Richmond, VA 23235 Fax No.: 804-272-4771
Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: 540-312-7712
NBO Associates, c/o Ronald C. Brooks
46 I 6 PhyJ!is Road, Roanoke, VA 24012 Fax No. #:
Propç:rty Location Magisterial District: Vinton
3687 Pitzer Road
Mt. Pleasant. VA Community Planning area.: Mt. Pleasant
Tax Map No.: Existing Zozùng: AR, AG3
079.04-02-10.00-0000 079.04-02-11.00-0000
079.04-02-12.00-0000 079.00-01-01.00-0000
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 361.74 Existing Land Use: Rural Preserve
REZÒNING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT$ (RiS)
Proposed Zoning: N/ A
Proposed Land Use: Golf Course w/ Residual Parcels for Future Development
Does the parcel meet the minÌInUm lot area, width, and fi:ontage requirements of the requested district? NA
Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes 0 No 0 NA
IF NOt A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0 NA
. . ,
VARIANCE APPLICANTS (V) . . ..
Variance of Section( s) of the Roanoke County Zoning OrdiDance in order to:
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLlCA.TION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR
INCOMPLETE.
RISV R/S V RlSV
rn Consultation ~ 8 112" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, ifapplicable
Justification Water and sewer appJication Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner=s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the Jmowledge and
consent of the owner.
Owner's Signature
'"
I JUSTIFICATION FÖRREzONING OR SPECIAL USE ;P~~REQUEST.
\
'i--lo
Applicant
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to detemùne the need and justification for the change
in terms of public health., safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use
additional space ifnecessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the ZoIÚllg Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the
begiDning of the applicable zoning district classification in the ZoIÚllg Ordinance.
The FountainHead Golf Club will further the purpose of the Roanoke County Ordinance by meeting the creation of a
convenient, attractive and harmonious community and by facilitating the provision of adequate recreational areas within
Roanoke County.
Specific to the Rural Preserve classification, The FountainHead Golf Club will maintain a rural appearance and offer a much.
needed recreátional facility for people in the Roanoke area. It also enhances the county's economic development opportunities by
providing the premier golf facility in Southwest Virginia.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
The FountainHead Golf Club meets and exceeds the requirements of Community Plan by preserving approximately 70% (guideline
requests 50%) of its property in open space.
The course provides for an innovative yet unobtrusive addition to the community by preserving open space which creates habitat
and protects wildlife, enhances environmental protection and limits future types of development
Please descn"be the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The course will generate little to no impact to school systems while it will increase tax revenue to Roanoke County.
FountaiDHead will be served by Mt Pleasant Fire and Rescue station as it is currently. Adjacent and nearby property
values will be enhanced with the introduction of an upscale golf community and the rural nature of the community will be
preserved. .
The golf course will be served by well and septic under this proposal and necessary permits will be obtained from the
health department The golf course will utilize integrated pest management practices to maintain the course and the
proposed lakes will serve as stormwater best management practices. The impervious cover of the proj ect will be very low
and overall water quality of the receiving waters should be improved by removing cattle from streams and adjacent land.
Access to the property will occur via a commercial entrance along Pitzer Road.
I JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
Applicant
The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance
can be granted. Please re"ad the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If
additional space is need~d, use additional sheets of paper.
1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in hannony 'with the intended spirit and purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance. t:' - It:,
NA
2. The strict application of the zonmg ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as
distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property.
NA
3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by
the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zonmg Ordinance.
NA
4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district
NA
, CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potentia1land use or
design issues arising from the request In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by Countypermitring
regulations.
~O^NO
c';.,""~,l~
,,-ì:{"'~ £:.~
....~:--..;;.,
2. .,_.".-~~" Þ_.
~c¡: :'4:.t.~" '~;.i?
V?:'_~:~ ; k
183ß
f- L:,
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a
professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request The County Planning Division
staff ma exe t some of the items or su est the addition of extra items, but the followin are considered minimum:
ALL APPLICANTS
ø a. Applicant name and name of development
ø b. Date, scale and north arrow
c.
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
L
Location. names of O'WD.ers and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adj oining properties
Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain. etc.
The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
All property lines and easements
All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
Location. widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
ø d.
ø e.
ø f.
ø g.
h.
- j.
Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
ø 1. A1:Jy driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
ø m Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
- p. A1:Jy proffered conditions at the si~e and how they are addressed
- q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule
¡tf ~~tP ef
Date
, '"
'"
Zoning; AR
"
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: George Golf Design, Inc.
Proposed Zoning: Special, Use
Existing Zoning: AR, AG3
Tax Map No Pt. 79.04-2-10,11.12 AND 79.00-1-1
~ - r-¡
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
Received by:
Applieë.cion fee:
PCIBZA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2Q68 FAX (540) 776-7155
Placards issued:
Bas date:
Case Number
.,.:~'¡¿'<~:::,,:~:'~;.::"'.~:.:,'-'"
t:-ifl!iJ5.~ðJ? P, IJ CmTS
.',:.':1"""'"',:.':-;,:,0,'0,,";,"'.',..,,"'"
, ' .,' "."
"", .' ",' -,,'
. """". '-,' ~: . 0"""" . . .', '0' ,
",..,_..,....,.,."...~.., """",'..
, . ,.., -"
",',,', , ","'.."
Check type of application filed (check all thAt apply)
~ R~zocing 0 Special Use 0 Variance
0 Waiver
0 Administrativ~ Appeal
Applicants name/address whip
Barry M. & Janet B. Fitzgerald
4644 Q.mvood Drive, Salem, VA 24153
, a:NfACf: Edward A. Natt 3912 Electric Road 240 8
Owner's nameladdn:sfw/zip
Barry M. & Janet.B. Fitzgerald
4644 Gumwood Drive, Salem, VA 24153
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt 3912 Elec
Property Location
5132 Poor tv'ountain Road
Phone:
Work: 72 5-8 180
Cell #:
Fax No.: 772-0126
Phone #:
Work: . 725-8180
F~.No. #~ 772-0126
Magisterial District:
Catawba
CommUDity PJ.a.ncing ar~a:
Catawba
Tax Map No.:
Part of 064.04-01-08 Existing Zoning: 1-2
Size of parcel(s): Acres: 4.514 I Existing La.nd Use: vacant
;~ì¿i~~:,~r~,~w. rt~Æ' !~i¥)i!~f~~~~~~~~~Jm.:., .;-~'.- -- .'. ~,. ,~, "_:,....: ~.~,~:'~'~'~.'...=~~~.~~. :,~'-
Proposed Zoning: R-1
Proposed Land Use: Singl e-fami Iy heme '
"boes the parcel meet the mmimum lot area, width, aDd frontage requ.irements of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the mí.D.imum criteria for the requested Use Type?
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If r~zoDing request, are conditioDS beìng proffered with this request? Yes ~
:'~~f.r%~;~.iej';W;;R~~ÂMii:öiiifijiiFi;¿'¡;i.iii;"ij~i1iiM~;;';;;;iiÂ\~-:""".~~.-'~ -: .':...-..'......-. ...-.,"'".."'--
~,l,;=!::¿,A?=:',J.J:;',:; ;'-' ": "'~"';', ""'-".o..t.,=~<,:::~,;::=,;':':-~'::l.:;,:,>"~,,~~~,,~'.,,:.,;~,~~,,,,~~" ~!,!;.J!;¿~':...~.o~~,:";:.j , o'..._~..J.;:~"',._:,:¡;..:...,--".w",,-'-,'_':",~,:...."
Yes
No
VaIJ.aJ:1celWaiver of Sectlon(s)
of the Roanóke COUJlty Zonmg Ordinanc:c in order to:
Appeal of ZoDing Admin.ist:rator's decision to
Appeal ofInterpr~tation of Section(s):
Appeal of Int~rpretation of Zoning Map to
of the RoaDoke COUJlty Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION Wll.L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THES:
ITEl\:fS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
Rlsrw V/AA FJSfW V/AA RJS/W V/AA
m Consultation E9i 8 1/2' x 11. concl;pt plan ~ Application f~
Application Metes aDd bounds description Proffers. if applicable
'Justification Watt:r and sewer application X Adjommg property owners
. I hereby certify that I am either the owner °hthe property or the owner's agent or contra has aDd am a~g .th the ~~~Iedge_~~
consent of the owner. œNERS: Ú Il,"" ø IJ
D."....." M- Fitzaerald Janet B. Fitzgerald
f-7
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald
Part of Tax Map No. 064-04-01-08
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The property is currently zoned as Industrial 2. However, the configuration of the property and its location
make it impractical for any additional industrial use. A major portion of the road frontage is located within
the 1 OO-year flood plain and there is already an existing use on the 1-2 property. The proposed rezoning
will aI/ow for the subdivision of a minor portion of the property and the creation of one single-family
residence to the rear. The family subdivision cannot be used because of the zoning of the tract.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The general area where the home is to be located is aU residential. The property owner would like to
subdivide the property and allow one of his children to construct a house on this parcel. The rezoning will
allow for an additional buffer between the residential property and the industrial use.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation and fire and rescue.
The rezoning of the property and the construction of a single-family home will have no impact on the
services provided by the County.
'"
\\..IOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Fitzgerald JUSTI FICA TION .doc
Address of Subject Property:
5132 Poor Mountain Road
Tax Map No.:
Part of 064.04-01-08
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald
'"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of West River
Road (Va. Sec. Rt. 629) on the easterly line of the property of
the Norfolk Southern Railway (formerly N & W Railway/Old
Virginia Railway); thence with the line of West River Road S.
69° 35' 42" E. 68.38 feet to a point; thence with new lines to
the property of the Applicant and with a curved line to the right
having a chord, bearing and distance of S. 20° 17' 13" E.
381.89 feet, and a length of 382.41 feet to a point; thence S.
25° 26' 53" W. 326.65 feet to a point; thence S. 52° 05'05" E.
646.68 feet to a point on the property of Norfolk Southern
Railway (formerly N & W Railway/Old Virginia Railway) right-
of-way; thence with the same S. 26° 50' 00" W. 230.00 feet to
a point on the northerly line of the property of Roger A. and
Shelia R. Harrison (Tax Map No. 64.04-01-09); thence with
the same N. 45° 13' 21" W. 716.24 feet to a point on the
easterly line of the property of Norfolk Southern Railway
(formerly N & W Railway/Old Virginia Railway) N. 25° 26' 53"
E. 448.06 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the left
having a chord, bearing and distance of N. 20° 10' 10" E.
372.16 feet, an arc distance of 372.69 feet to the point and
place of BEGINNING; and containing 4.514 acres.
\\JOll Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Filzgerald LEGALdoc
F- --I
Page 1 of 1
\
/'
"v/
~-7
1.
,,"
~
~
.-"""""
.....
cf
~
~
Q;
:S
:¡
)
1;1-.
519';
14.1
&
~
.-"""""
.....
,..ö
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
"--
Applicants name: Barry M. &- Janet B. Fitzgerald~
Proposed Zoning: Rezoning to R- 1
Existing Zoning: [-2
Tax Map No Part OF 64.04-1-8
'"
~
,
INST. NO. -------
lIT:
~ A NOTARY PUBlIC It AND f'(JI 11£
AfaŒSo\ID STAlE DO - CERm lHAT BMRY II. FI1ZŒRAIJ) AND .wET ø.
FI12OOIAlD IHO5E HAIlES NI£ SGNED 10 1HE f'OIIEIØIG IIRßItG HA\'E
PtIISØtALL Y N'PEAIIED I!EF'tIIE lIE AND ACICIIOIUDGED 11£ SAllE It lIT AfaŒSo\ID
.ARDC1JQI (IN 1115 - DAY CF 11»1.
lIT CQIISSI(II fJII'IRES:
J.ßiWJ2
¡; _~~NE t
wI-WIllI
APPROX. - APPROXIMA lE
- X- EXISTING FENCE
~ 1"
0 ,~ 1>ø
~ .k "'<...., .¿ ... ... ~\~ \\
f .t>: 10 ~/""~II . S.J.TJY. 4Z"E :ë.ot-JEt> SIiE
¡:f ¡¡¡It PI! If If ;:-...: !lð.51 I"")
:;! * v~? SET ~:;Þ~<- ->=- ~ ~_UI.
cr ~';.~':¡ rO1; I: 12
0 ',I' ., . " 1--
~ ~ ; U "!k . 6-44"01"Ð5" -
! ~ .~ l ~,¡f¡ÕI' 't.t. ~:= I? r'=:.."
!ii I ¡:'" . 'i1 ¥ ,.. ~ f ~ QÐo S Jr4S"OO'" E. 412.88' VICINITY UAP
,."t ,,'" ..., '\~. ~
~ ,¡ t_~. r ...."" ,
.... $ - PIN if ~ "'ð ..~ ~ J ;ç... \ '!>. "-
1ft; ¥ ø SET '/.æ'r- :¡.. \, '\ CENERAl NO1E!t
Aø."" ~ @ ~~ ~ ":'= -I? \. ~~ ~ I. 1IIS PlAT WAS I'RD'ARED 1I1IKJIT IIÐIÐIT CF A 1I1lE REPOIT AND IS .
~' ~ ~ \ . SlJB.£CT 1HER£1D. lIÐIEF1JR[, 11DE !lAY EXIST ~ 11101
1 ..... /' ...- '" AFF£CT1HE PIICI'ER1Y NOT - IIEREIIIL
.. ~ ~ 'ì - , '" 2. M: SIJI ,£CT PRIJ'fR1Y IS 1I1HII 11£ lIII1S Of ZONE "'Ir AND . AE" AS
II~ '~n.... CT -.- ,4... SHOIIN (IN 11£ FEIIA FI.OOD INSIIIANŒ RAlE IIAP NO. 51111C00J8 D.
I '"V 1JI'A " ':A'»' EFFEC1I'/E DAlE CCJœER 1!1, IIIt3. 1IIS ~1DI IS BA5ED (IN SAIl
'" . 7S17 ÞA - 1":\ !lAP AND lIAS NOT BEEN \'ERIÆD BY AC'II/Þ.L ÆLD ELEVAlDIS.
.. BIIIIIED BY CXØIERS -- MEA 1-.!.1 3. PIN SET BY lPPaslS 1/2 ItCH DIMIE1tR BY 18 INCHS LONG
... ,..1,. i" 1. 2. 3. ... 14. 13. 10, 1i~ RDnRCIIC RIXI DRMN 10 2 IIQ£S NiJNE.. IiROUND II1H A PlAS1IC
~ lie {f M 11.12, 10 1 1ICWS'tE.)."~ 'ItllOII CAP (IN 1tP II1H "T.P. PARKER PRIJÓ. CQR." ÐeOSSED. A 3-4
/l¡ 1 J""TJ V TAX NO. OM.O4-OI-oII ~-q; 'Ø-I....... rOOT IIOAl FENCE POST IS _lODE callIER PI!.
1. r" ~ \ /I~
ORICINAl12.J91 AC lRACT~ IIi ./
cO ORIGINAl TAX NO. 084.04-01-08 ~ (. "",¿. 11'l
- CCUNTY NOIES:. 1 ~P N to,.I.e. ~ Iï. ~
~SET .lJ1 ~ I. ~
1. - IÐECF BY 11£ - CCUN1Y SU8IJMSI(IN AŒIIT IS f'(JI (9 p7 ~ ~!!ff 'I r¡f!
P\JRPOSES Of EIISIIIIIG COIIPlIAIIŒ IfIH 11£ ROANCICE CCUN1Y SIJI!DMSI(J 6 IRON PI! '" ';! E . II <:J'
aIDIIIANŒ. PRlYAlE!lATIERS. SUOI AS CCIIP\JAIIŒ IfIH RESTRJCII'IE '" FCUNO wI .. II ¡., ........
COVÐIAII1S ell 011ÐI 1I1lE IIECUIIEIIÐI1S. API'\JCAIII 10 11£ PROPER1Y StOIIN '!Ð.lDW lPPa5 II ¡;y
~ NOT IIE'«IÐI III APPIIIMD 8lH RtCARlllO 1IIS SIJI!DMSI(J OR ¡<. ~ ~~C}. ~ CAP /r -1--.."'::::...--.. // t ;1
:z. 11£ 10 FOOT GIIA'ÆL ROIÐIIAY 1IIiQUQI LØT ell PARŒI. AND $EIMIC , oft¡' S >.: ""'~ 4' ~ 1 -- -::J ~Ift .... ~
AO.ICIIJIÇ PROPÐrnES IS A PllYAlE ROAOIIo\Y (SlE DEDI BOOK 1m PAŒ %40). ,'" .¡ f .... t< .,
W~~~~:O~AST~~ "q,;~~~f~ ~ ~. /1/ ~ ~~~ II/!
FtIR IIAII1ÐIANŒ UIIII. SUC111ME AS IT IS COIS1JIUÇJ[ ) NIl) crnÐIYISE 'q¡ 'D ~. CZI tI// \!t I"" q,. ¡ ~.
COIIPlES 11111 ALL REWIRÐ1ÐI1S Œ 11£ WlGHA ŒPAR'1IIÐIT CF "",.,... ;r. I .""'-, ~ ;
1IINIS'CI!TA1DI f'(JI 11£ ADIII1J(IN CF 5UBDIIISI(IN S1IŒEIS CURIŒMT AT 11£ , . "" tfJ/...,. IŸ'\
~ =~~ ~Rt= s:ro. ~ ~ ~ 8tH ~. ~~6.", ..¿¡ .
fUN)$ 01IIER 1HAN 1IIOæ APINIS1ERE\I BY 1HE - DEPARlIIENT CF . ~~ ~~/ "Ii' IRON PtoI ,.'"
1IINIS'CI!TAlICIN. D"" ..r...h °1 ~ FOUND WI
"\ EQVES1eb ~~~"..;-V A^'/' $; Î ~ow 1PP~
~ R Ere t\\ \~~ ~.~ ~h'> 1/ ~ ~
'fOR - \ ,~ ~¥/ II PtoIG).
- CCUNTY SUBDMSICN AŒIIT DAlE. ~ 4!dt/ / . SET ï..~
I'RŒ'EIfTY CF )\ // ß
IICfIR A. . HUA R. IWR5CII //.1. ~
TAX. NO. œ-UI4..DI-Dt / ~I ..
D.B. 1228, PG.1197 APPRDØIAlE , ~
~ '
6..œ2%'J4"
11-1142.86"
La JI.W
OÐ- S 71'1"OCI" E
JI.W
- ALL lIEN BY 1HESE fR£SÐI1S 10 lIT:
lHAT BMRY III f11ZGfJ1AlD AND JANET I\. FTIZŒRAID ARE OWNERS OF 11£ lRACT Of lAND
SHOIN I£RE(IN COITAitING 1:ut1 A.cIIES, BOUNDED BY taHRS I 11RI 12 10 1 1tClUSM. IÐIG
AIL Of 11£ lAND caM'IÐI 10 SAID O'IIŒRS IJ'lIIIAIICH . ASSOCIA 1D\. IIICORPORA lED. A
VIIQIIIA CORPIJRA1DI BY DEED DAlEO AUGUST J. 18117 AND RECCI!DED IN 11£ C1ERK's cmœ: CF
11£ CIRCUIT COURT Of ROANCICE CCUNTY. WIGINIA .. DEED BOOK 1%71. PAGE 240.
1HE SAIl ONŒRS IIEREBY CERlFY 1HA1 1HEY HA\'E 5IÆ!DI'IIDED 11£ PRQPERTY AS SHOll!
-(IN EN1Rl Y CF 11EIR OIl! fIŒE IRL AND ¡\caJiI) AS REQUIRED BY 5:CJ1ONS 15.%-%240
lHRU 15.2-2278 CF 11£ 11150 cœE CF WIGINIA AS AMENDED 10 DAlE AND 11£ ROANOŒ COUNTY
SUBDI\1SION ORDINNICE AS AIIENDED 10 DAlE.
KIII£SS 11£ $IGNA lURES AND SEAlS Œ 11£ SAIl 0NiERS:
BARITY I/. FiTZGERAlD. DINER
D.B. 1m. PG. 240
DAlE
JANET ø. FITZŒRAlD. 0IItIER DAlE
D.B. 1m. PG. 240
STAlE Π-
WIT:
\ A NOTARY I'UBlIC II NIl) f'(JI 11£
Af'aŒSAID STAlE DO - CER1FY lHAT BMRY II. FllZGERAlD AND JANET ø.
F\TZCERAlO - HAIlES NI£ SGNED 10 1HE FIJREGaNÇ - HA \'E
PtIISØtALL Y APPEARED I!EF'tIIE lIE AND AOOIOIIlEDCED 1HE SAllE .. lIT AfaŒSo\ID
.ARDC1JQI (IN 1115 - DAY CF 11»1.
CF
MY CQIIIISSI(IN EXI'IŒS:
NOTARY PUBlIC
STAlE CF -
CF
NOTARY I'UBlIC
COORD/NA TFS
IIf¿ JU:IIJlIlI.fl EADli!i
1 1S/KJ:I.:J2 1SI3I.41
2 545C1Ø2 41/.52.19
J 1UOS78 _1.4;,
4 i5UB.t4 4el.51
5 ~11I 4847.14
6 ð!JZ7.4tJ 4JJI1.:J2
1 fJ!J31.,g 4ð..'.Ø5
II UBI.JJ 4f6D.!1
9 821I.0fJ _4T
IÒ 6241.22 41lU.!55
II 62Q1<U -»
12 61:111.41 41114.21
1 1S/KJ:I.:J2 5131.41
13
14
-02
!S5H.0fJ
4622.14
44/11.76
PARlIAl SURVEY AND
SUBDIVISION PlAT FOR
BARRY M. &: JANEJ~IZGERALD
CLOSED BY PJB. 1RACT -A" AMI "'II'" ON .AJNE 18. 2004.
GRAPHIC sc.w:
R~b\l LEt:;)
SHO'MNG 1HE SUIIDI'IISIQI 01' A 12.391 ACRE lRACT
CREAlI1tÇ HERE(IN lRACT -A" (J.877 ACRE)
AM) lRACT "8" (4.514 ACRE)
SllUAlE ON POOR 1l0000AIN ROAD (VA. 5:c. RlE. 812)
AND ' £$T RIVER ROAD (VA. 5Ec. RlE. 6JIJ)
CATAMIA MAGImRIAl DlSlRICT
ROANOKE CQJNlY. VIRGINIA
.. 1HE tURK"S cmCE CF 11£ CIRCUIT COORT CF ROAJ Q(E tOONiY. WIGNA,
'IllS IIAP WAS PR£SÐIlEO WllH 11£ CER1IFJCA 1E CF AO<NOWI.EDCEIIE lHERElD
ATTAOIEI) ADIIIT1ED 10 RECORD AT _o"a.oac ----II. (IN 'IllS - DAY
CF ZOD4.
Ø"f'.
DEPurt C1ERK
100' 5Cf o' 100' '2.DO'
~~.:~- .,"=100'
NEW lHS 1(}-13-14-4 ARE BASm (IN A CIJIRÐIT f1Ð.I
SlIMY. RE1IAIIIING PROPERTY IS PlAl1ED FRQI RECORDS.
BARRY I/. AND .wET ø. fI1ZGERALD
ARE 11£ 0I1IERS CF RECORD.
DEED BOOK 1271. PAΠ24Q.
TAX , 64.04-01-08 SCALE: I" - 100'
DRAWN: .r.II/pJB DATE: .AlNE 16. 2004
CAlC: PJB W.O. 04-0278
N.B. .R-2J11 D.N. 04-0218-REV.DWG
~ TPP&S T. P. PAIIXD . IIOJI T1
~ ~:'.::: ::. -=-- . ,
"~N"',,". --- . )
_n.. ""-1
P.B.__. PG._-
lESJE;
$IEVEII A. -.
C1ERK
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
F-g
"
Date received:
Received by:
",".., """,' .."',' .'"
Application fee:
, b.oð
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
J'"'~'~'\,¥i.fiJJ~¡¡jrs' , .
., ,,"'.', ' ..',' -'" , '..' .,...'.', ..
",. "c""'"
, ".".'" ."'" '." .. "" .." .." .. '," ..,' "','."
"'.,,, ..."
....', "'" ..."'"
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning )áSpecial Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal
Applicants name/address wlzip Pé:.T¿ HO{;F?IYJ Of, P/'?CSIOE,flT Phone: ~o. 7,..,.'f2.n
. STAR C,TY C()IY/IC:S f G.ðI'J1!.'S Work: S.4m~
S'2.3 W,1114fY/son R().lJO Cell #: $'2. '-GGPO '
RO"noKe. VA. :J.Vøt1. Fax No.: 2.5-0$1('1
Owner's name/address whip D4vIO tv, Lony e~T/JT~
fe.ðrm~ 1'1. L.ðnj
$"9~ Nv"'¡-""111I1JJ C I~
I2()AMlflI. V4 )yþ "
Phone #:
Work: 563-2633
Fax No. #:
Property Location
572..~ W"'I.lJI1?~Ofl Ro
RO~nD/«., VA. 2. 'fOI:z..
Tax Map No.: 31./0 - b'" J2.d ~ 19,'¡-2.0
Magisterial District:' j.lÞII¡¡"'s
Community Planning area: 1./()t.L IMS
Existing Zoning: C .2...
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 2.23 Exisring Land Use: f(ë,,(ÁiL...,. W¿Æ/:/;{II/lff:,. (,4cce:;sðr'r
::'~"':"~~~;.~k~çfAL. P$Jf:f~l[1fl~1ij~~MŸ~J~~~~~lq~i:~~lm, ..,,;":' ,'~'--"_: ....:_,~'~.~,~,,--~..~,:':'~-'--~.....~.~:.,.,-',':_".
Proposed Zoning: C-2. (NO C lJ.6fÞ9c)
Proposed Land Use: l?éTAi,- ., Cornmé:RC1/J'- In
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
f!l.i¡) No IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum. criteria for the requested Use Type? @ No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FmST
If rezomng request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No
Q!1S~'~ "'~:~:;'~~~ ~:.~~Ü.~.j~~:~iil._ijE1iii~:~;~.:',..::J .,.~~~:.~ .'~::: .:_'..~~~~,:~~ ,,~~~,.~;~.~"~,~'.:":~~
Variance!Waiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Î11 order to:
~{A
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of ZoIJing Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSmG OR INCOMPLETE.
RlSfW V/AA RISIW V/AA RlSfW V/AA
m Consultation :iC 81/2. xII. concept plan ~ Application fee
>< Application )( Metes and bounds description N A Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application X Adjoining property O'WDers
. I hereby ceftify that I am either the owner of property or owner' agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge aDd
consent of the owner. u,f5( ,
@~ '!1~. . <> Slë;.4>:t'Jre
CD" TPAcT PfJn::..¡.tJJ'l!,~
2
~~~~~~~~ON FOR lŒZÖ~G;.~~:~~~,þ~':!~~î,:?~'~~-~~~~".',..'..,'- .':.: .'..'_.:~ .'.,' .'.]:,::..,".':..'.'--.
Applicant
Pê. TC ¡.Joef/..JYJj - ~TA~ CITy Com/c.r T G4mCS
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for
the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County OrdIDance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
P/tAre. ,Ça. ,4TTACWu' .rn.foR~n~n
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
P Le,/Jre. See. !JrrtJcue rJ. In for I'm rlOl1
Please descnce the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjommg properties, and the surrounding area, as well
as the impacts on public services and facilities, including wa:œrlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
PI(.(JS~ Sœ. tJrr"cuev! ,J:Y\rORYfI,oTfÔ/v
.3
~-8
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Ph: 540.767.GAME (4263)
David R. Holladay
Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator
County of Roanoke
5204 Bernard Drive
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018~0798
June 25, 2004
Dear David,
On behalf of Star City Comics and Games Inc., please accept our attached application for a
Special Use Permit (SUP). Per our previous conversations and your subsequent
determination, we are requesting a SUP for a commercial indoor amusement land use at
5728 Williamson Road.. Four tax. parcels are a part of this request. All are zoned C-2
Commercial.
Our letter to you dated June 16, 2004 provided detailed information on the nature and scale
of our current and proposed business. I have attached a copy of this letter to our application
for the review of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. As requested on the
application, I have also provided detailed information on the relationship of our proposed
land use to the county zoning ordinance, community plan, and surrounding land uses. This
information is presented below.
1. Please explain how the request {ùrthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance
(Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning
district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed use will be located in a C-2 zoning district in an existing building now
being used as a retail furniture store and warehouse. This portion of Williamson Road is
developed with a wide variety of retail and business activities. Our request furthers the
purposes contained in Section 30-3 of the zoning ordinance in the following ways:
. Our proposed location is on a primary highway, and generates very little
weekday traffic. The traffic associated with our business will not occur
during weekday AM and PM peak hours. Truck traffic associated with
our business will also be considerably less than that generated by the
furniture store.
'"
--~
~-~
- Weare currently located on Williamson Road, and wish to remain in the
county. Our reuse of an existing building in a commercial area preserves
vacant and undeveloped land within the county, and will not require the
expansion of existing public services. Services currently available to us at
our CUlTent location and available to the furniture store (police,
fire/rescue, utilities etc,) will be used by us at our new location.
. The employment we now provide, and the taxes we currently contribute,
will continue to benefit the county's economic development base.
The purpose of the C-2 district, as stated in Section 30-54.1 of the zoning ordinance is to
pennit a wide variety of retail and service related activities. Our use of a parcel
cun-ently zoned C-2 is consistent with this purpose.
2. please explain how the lJroiect conforms to the general guidelines and policies
contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan.
The future land use map contained in the 1998 Community Plan designates this portion
of Williamson Road for "Core" development. High intensity urban development is
encouraged in Core areas, as are highway oriented commercial uses. Our proposed use
is consistent with recommended land use types and detenninants for Core areas.
3. Please describe the imvact(s) of the request on the property itself. the ad;oining
properties. and the surroundinf! area. as well as the impacts on public services and
facilities. including water/sewer. roads. schools. varlcs/recreation and fire and rescue.
Our intent is to reuse the existing building and the twenty-one space parking area on the
site. We do not envision any building expansions at this time. The interior of the
building will be upgraded to meet our business needs and to comply with any applicable
building code requiIements. Tax parcel 38.10- 6- 20 is cun-ently undeveloped, but could
be developed for additional parking if requITed to meet the future demands of our
customers. We will not have any outdoor storage of materials or products.
Our proposed use of this property will not have a negative land use impact on
Williamson Road or the surrounding area. Land uses along Williamson Road are
cUlTently a mixture of high intensity retail, commercial service and office uses. Specific
uses in the area include a used car lot, a bowling alley, convenience stores, fast food
restaurants and a large flea market. Our site is adjacent to a small strip commercial
shopping and office center (to the south), and a truck accessory business (to the north).
Parcels across Williamson Road are zoned C-2 and are currently vacant. The rear of our
proposed site is adjacent to an unimproved right-of-way (alley) and R-l zoned
properties within the Boxley Hills Subdivision. A privacy fence and dense vegetation
currently screen the site from these R-I areas.
Finally, our proposed use will have no impact on public services such as schools and
parks and recreation. The site is currently served by public water and sewer, and is
'"
~-~
located within existing police and fire and rescue service areas. Our proposed use will
not place unusually or heavy demands on these utility) or public safety services.
I hope this information has help to further clarify the nature of our request and its
conformance with comprehensive plan guidelines and zoning ordinance requirements.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or need additional information as
a part of this request... I and/or my representatives will plan on attending the anticipated
August 3rd and 24th public hearings on this request
I can be contacted using the information listed below) and will do my best to answer any
questions which may arise.
Thank you for your assistance with these matters.
Pete Hoefling) Sr.
Star City Game Center
www.starcitygames.com
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd NW
Roanoke) VA 24012
ph:(540)767-GAME (4263)
fax:(540)265-0544
e-mail: outpost!@starcitygames.com
';-~
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Ph: 540.767.GAME (4263)
David R. Holladay
Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator
County of Roanoke
5204 Bernard Drive
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
June 16, 2004
Dear David,
As per on conversation, we are currently seeking to expand the Star City Game Center
from our existing location (a 5,500 sq. ft. building located at 5623 Williamson Rd. N.W.)
to a much larger location (a 24,000 sq. ft. building location at 5728 Williamson Rd. N.W.).
I am writing to:
a) Ensure that we will be able to move our existing business, in its entirety, to this
new property.
and
b) Find out if any specific pennits will be required in order to do so.
What is the Star City Game Center?
The Star City Game Center is owned and operated by Star City Comics & Games, Inc., a
Roanoke, Virginia based corporation. Star City Comics & Games, Inc. is considered to be
a world leader in sales of Collectable Card Games (CCGs). Some examples of CCGs
include.. .
Pokemon (http://www.pokemon-tcg.com) - manufactured by Nintendo
Yu-Gi-Oh! (bttp://www.upperdec!œntertainmentcomlyu2ioh/) -manufactured by Upper
Deck Entertainment
Marvel (http://www.upperqeckentertainmentcomfmarvel/) - manufactured by Upper Deck
Entertainment
'"
" ",.....
1-"" "6
Magic: the Gathering (http://www.magicthegathering.com) - manufactured by Wizards of
the Coast, a subsidiary ofHasbro
Each of the aforementioned manufacturers has created multi-million dollar organized play
(OP) programs in order to drive sales of their games at the retail level.
What do we do?
The Star City Game Center generates approximately 90% of its income through mail order
sales of the aforementioned games. The remaining 10% is generated through retail sales
and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments (as an accessory to those retail sales) at its
physical location. An example of one such tournament is the JSS (Junior Super Series)
qualifier; an event which we host 2-4 times per year. These qualifier tournaments are only
open to children under the age of fifteen years old and award a $1,000 college scholarship
(provided by the game manufacturer) to the winner. The winner also qualifies for the JSS
Championship; an annual tournament which awards $100,000 in college scholarships
amongst its top finishers.
Why do we need more space?
Despite the fact that 90% of our revenue is derived fÌom mail order sales, in-store
tournaments generally have to accommodate dozens to hundreds of players. This requires
plenty of seating, along with ample space for players to safely move about. Below, I have
provided a more detailed explanation.
Our current 5.500 sq. ft. location at 5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
3,100 sq. ft. (upstairs) - retail sales and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments
2,400 sq. ft. (downstairs) - mail order sales
Our new 24.000 sq. ft. location at 5728 Williamson Rd. N.W.
9,000 sq. ft. - retail sales and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments
As we discussed, our current space is too small to accommodate many of the larger
events/tournaments that we have the opportunity to run. Although we still run many
smaller local events/tournaments at our existing location, we are often forced to host the
larger events/tournaments in cities such as Greensboro, NC or Richmond, VA. This costs
us money, since many participants often purchase other merchandise while visiting our
Game Center. It also costs other local businesses money, particularly the numerous fast
food restaurants, pizza delivery businesses and "7-11" type convenient stores scattered
along Williamson Road.
Since the majority of our Collectable Card Game business is done on the weekends, having
this additional space will also allow us to set aside weeknights to accommodate bingo
'"
}:: ..~ .~
activities, something we have been licensed to do for years. On these nights, we will
simply be leasing a portion of our space to local organizations/charities so that they have a
site from which to run their fundraisers. The fundraisers themselves will be run entirely by
the licensed organizations/charities and our only income will be generated from renting
them a portion of our space in which to do so.
5,000 sq. ft. - mail order sales
As you saw, we have become quite cramped in our current warehouse/office and need the
increased space in order to accommodate our continued growth in this segment of our
business
10,000 sq. ft. - warehouse space for rent
This is an attached, but basically independent, warehouse at the back end of the building.
We plan on renting this space, preferably to a company that compliments our existing
business. Current prospects include authorized distributors (those who supply businesses
like ours with the games that we stock, but don't sell direct to the public) and smaller game
manufacturers. Nothing has yet been confirmed.
Additional information
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. I can be contacted using the
information listed below, and will do my best to answer any questions which may arise.
Thank you for your assistance with these matters.
Best wishes,
Pete Hoefling
President, Star City Game Center
www.starcitygames.com
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd NW
Roanoke, VA 24012
ph:(540)767-GAME (4263)
fax: ( 540)265-0544
e-mail: outpost!@starcitygames.com
ç-~
Special Use Permit Application of
. Star City Comics and Games Inc.
Tax Parcel #'s: 38.10 - 6 -12
38.10 - 6 - 18
38.10 - 6 - 19
38.10 - 6 - 20
..
June 25, 2004
t
i
.
.
I
I
+- I
.
I
I
It"
..
.
~
I
.
..
ô
~
if
cg -4
.
'I
~
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
I
~
~
IjI)
po.
@
21.'
,.27 At:.
57J6
ï
'I
'I
'I
I
'I
'I
'I
.
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
'I
I
'I
I
I
:á
....
~.
~
ø
~
,
'I
I
'I
'I
I
I
,
eo
~
t
~
?
..
;.
,
~
~
;....
-
7.
'"
'"
ó
..,
.
.
.
.
.
. :
.
.
.
!
s~,o
.(
,'ff~~46'~ ' ,
. 5".:( t'l J(. ~ k.)¡,aJ.
.¡(Á:,Þ t£'; ~¥íÞ/f .'
, /1-;-,
t -'S
S~1.110~ Pl~£: 213
~:Is DEE!) made ~d entered into this' 'f¡"'~ day
of september, 1978, by ~d ~tween aAROLD T. LONG and
ELIZABETH T. LONG, his wife, på.rties of the first part, à,nd
DÂVID W. LONG, party of th~. second part.
...
: WITNESSETH:
,-;'--------:--
'mAT FOR AND IN CONSIDEAATION of the sum of ONE
HUNDRED 'l'WEN'l'Y-rIVÉ THOUSANt> DOLLARS ($125,000.00), cash in
, ' ,
hand paid by th~,party.of the seèond p~rt unto the parties of
" ,'" " , '
the first part, the receipt of Whic~ is hereby acknowledged,
the parties 'of th8: first part do hereby 'BARGAIN; SELL; GRANT
and CONVEY with General Warranty and English cov~nants ~f
, '
.. Title unto the sald party of the second part, David W. Long,
his heirs and assign~ forever, all of their right, title and
..'
interest in ~he' following lots or parcels of la~d, with
. , ' '
appurtenances tþereto belonging, lying'ånd,being in the County
.
'of Roanoke, State of Virginia, and more particularly 'described
AI fo110W8~ to-wit:
1'ARCEL I
B!GINNING at a point On the westerly side of
Williamson Road (D. S. Route No. 11) 30$.0 '
feet northerly as measureð a~ong the westerly
side of Williamson Roa~ from the westerly side
of Williamson Road and the norther1y side of
Abney Road, þoth extended, thenc~ leaving
Williamson'Road and with the northerly line of ,
the prop~rty conveyed to R. W. Bowers construction
corporation in Deeët Book 742, pac¡e 424, S. 79° ,
29' 30. W. 250.0 feet to an iron,'the"ce N. 11.
58 1/2' W. 125.0 feet: to an iron, thence N. 79.'
29' 30. E. 250~0 feet to an iron on the weste'rly
side of Williamson RQad; thence with the
westerly side of Williamson Road,' S. 11.
58 1/2' E. 125.0 fe~t to the place of
BEGIHN~G, and, ,"
._a &, -rra
..:-......, '
-~
.COkfAINING 0.71 acre. and being more
particularly shown on a' plat of survey made
þy'1'. P.Parker, S.C.E., October 27,1965,
attAchecl 1:0 and made a part hereof; and
'"
"
~ .. 8MrtW.
...- .,. .....
.......... ~
1;
i
3¿¡~~1102 u~:214
f--~
- 2 -
BEmG the same property C\;,;.1veyed' to Harold
T" Lon9' and 'David W. Lon9' from Greenland
Development Corporation, Valley Lumber, .
Corporation and C. 'F. ttefauver ana Irene C.
Kefauver, his wife, by deed da~ed October 28, ,
19'65, of re~ord in the Clerk's Office of the
Cir~it Cour1; foi: the County o'f Roanoke,
Virginia, in Deed Book 788, page 514.
PARCEL II "
, " ,
S!øt~I~G at an iton'åt ,th~ $o~tbwest COrner
of the Barold '1'. Ipne¡ and David W. Lone¡,
pro'pe-rty, being 'also corner to R. W. Bowers
Constructton Corp. property, thence wii;.n the
north line of Bowers property S.19° 29' 40.
1f. 190.0S' to an iron~ thence with the east'
side of a strip reserved for widenine¡ the
alley as shown on map N. SO, 401 W. 88.40,ft.
to a point, thence with the orie¡inal east
line of the alley N.'go lS' W. 36.86 ft.,to
a point, thence with a new d~vision line
through the property of C.' F. Kefauver, et
ala, N. 7go 29' 30., E. ,17$.61 ft. to an
,iron at the' northwest; corner of the Lone¡
property; tþence with the west line of the,
Long propertý S. 11.° 5S' 30. E. 125.0 ft.
to thè BEGINNING and containing 0,52 acres
and being as shown on the map made by T. P.
Pa~ker, C. E., dated January 15, 19~8,
attached to and made a part hereof, and
BEING the sarne property conveyed to Harold
T. Long 'and David W. Long, from Valley ,x,U!T\ber
'Corporation, Co' t. Kefauver and Irence C.
'Kefauver, his wife; and Greenland Develo~ent,
Corpor~tion, 'by deed dated January 24, :.968,
of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, in neecS Book 854, page 1.
PARCEL III
BEGINNING at a. point on the west 51,de of
Williamson Road being the north~asterly
corner of an 0.71 acre tract owned'by,~arold
'1". and David, W. Long', thence with a line
~etween the Long and C. F. Kefauver, et ala
properties, S. 79-~9~30 w. 428~61 to, a point
on an alley, th~nce with the line of the
alley and the C. F. Kefauver property N.
9-18, W. 13.14', to a point, "thence with
alley S. 80. 42' W. 65.10 ft. to a point
on the rear line of Lot 3, Block 12, Boxley
. Rills, thence with the line of Lot 3 and the
C. F~ Xefauver property N. 16° 48' W. '
45.75 ft. to a point, thence, leaving Lot ,3,
with a new line" throuCfh o;he C. F. Kefauver,
et ala property N. 7ge 29' 3Q., E. '496.89 ft.' ,
, j
]
]
,J'
\
i
Ir
[
,....,~....""
t=-~
.'
- J ,-
",.ll";,),.:,"!:"")
...., - '- .
~O ~ ?c~nt o~ ~he west side of williamson
Rcaå, ~en~a'~ith Williamson Road S. 11°
SS' 30" E. 60.0 ft. to the SEGIloi"NING and
co~t~ini~g 0.67 acrei ~nd baing as shown'on ,
'nap þ: T. P. p~rker. S.Ç.E., d~ted Januar~ 15.
~96e. revised April 21,,1970, attached hereto:
a~ë, ' "
E::n¡û the same pro?ert:r' conve:,'ed to"Harold T.
:c~ç and'D~vid W. Long from C. F. Kefauver and
!renc~ C:.. Kefauver, husband and wife, Valley
Lumber Cor?oration' and Greenland Development
Corporation, by deed dated April 24, 1970, of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court for the county of Roanoke" virginia, in
~eed Book 897, Page 20.
TO- n;"\TE A1':D TO HOLD unto the' party of the second
::.1r':, D.a..'id "-'. Long. his heirs and assigns forever.
Thi:; geed is made ,subject to ali easements,
t'c:;tri:tion,; o:I.nd conditions of record affecHhq the title
t~ t~~ prore~ty her~in conveyed.
IHT~ESS the following signatures and Boals:
'-71 ;,¡; :; ':t:Cf
~. r,cng,
(SEAL)
~~~~,¿,~-ZZ:{~~,.~,r. '
E_~Zaëth .T. Long" " ï.'
, (SEAL)
~7AT~'OF VIRGINIA,
.:: IT':." Or RbA~ olœ" To-wi t:
,The foregoing i~strument was acknowledged before ma
"';~P; "".: ',jo1" of hpto¡$er, 1978, by Harold T. Lo~q and
E¡izac~t~ T. Lo~g. hi5 wife.
, 1 ¿,,¡! , d9, /9;ý()
p, .;
.(:~'- ".'.~~1¿,~t~~-'-4~,
~/,~ S"'ll'.tÌ'..:--"""1jt', , , No ryPub11c:
; ~~ ' 0 . ~,.: ~1.(',.'t)1 t~ .!~I(t¡:lt r~Jt1Jor thl! Ç"'tP'ltf of Ro.'no"'~. v; . Int~
: ,;:,~., .,.A::?#. _lt1/J'r~,...r,',.r::""":",'!;r.r',(:~ :C-:;)'1d
/l,- ":',""'...~~,:.-:.".",~.",...,, .."..,'":.,,
/.~ ....~I t~.' ,"., , .' ' . (
7'"\.' ., '" -, , , . , . . ",'"... ":;
~I.)\H- ' .-::':' .:'-..,..I.dJt../~'
. . :. ' t-r.' ~ .... -vi '<:;1#-'1 (' rf
. '." '.. ... ':', ~~-~U,t.c'~'" II ,ÿ~;-;:': :':¡; ::;;.,.
,~J cOmmission expires
~""""'I'-r'k'
. ',.
'"
"
, ,.
00
......
,~
&.1
"O,
,~.
"-,
~ I~'
......
'10<
g
10
"
7
.
,'("""""""'4 ~.F. I(~,."..~r I"r.I"~¡
,.~- /'o,.,ø
,.
N79':.Z9'" a-Eo - -.
"e.w I'he 17~. ~I' "."
ð.52, Acres
/'YO. ",::;,0 ' Ir."
-S,79'z""4ð'oW '
. k:W; °tYl'ers'
t;'lIslr. c.'p-
0.44 A-.
<IV],? "-2 .,:.,go.e:
49€>.89'
""'"
q..¿;7 ~cre
42.8.4>'. -S7':2.9:'3o'"W
2$0.0'
-, .0
"~It ~ .
fñ~
~ ~.
'q°
e.
~
~.
I
í, °.°
PrV6r!y ,~ .
/1.,..// T: L."..:JI D.v,"" IV. L,'t: ,
'.".7/ .A¿r
, ro
.' ~~
Q ,
. \i ~
0, ~ .~
"\i; ~
.~:
I,
'~
\It
}.
""" . I
~ \'~ ~I
... . '"
". ."!...I
~. ~, .,
I)" \ 0'" 1"'841':"1 -r ~
~ .. I "s.~4I' '~.~:i
J '\ \ . ~~:
. -' ..'Ó
,- . ~ '"
~ ." .¡.
- ~ ",~.,..'I.,.
, \ . ~,ß ~~. '
, """', .J;. ~
o~. II It '. 't., Q V-
4", "t..,,~
'II t't). .....
' \ ~.~,,~
II) ,....¡~"" .
. - ~"'
, \- p-
o () \ ' '
. "0' 0 .~ ".,.
... ~ \
. ~ ~" .~ ~ -
. 'I Q...,,:v °
5 ~ ~" '\. .:: .. ~
~' " "'JK "'-'0
'~ -1~ .~[~~.
, ,.,:~ ~
~ .... ':'I-,
- . ",:",.\,.
1ft.
" ' ~
,\... ,~,.,'l --
". .' ",. ,~y -.sI':z'~~ln'/
. . o. . "'\ "'we", ~ F.it"".
. -\0 . , ~"'$"" 1:'",.
' .. ~ '. .
~'
- .)...
, ...... ",
\ ",. ~
"""
. ". t\a ~ .
\ .:
--. .,
, .
0'
r~o.o'
J Æ~W.D.~e~;~~s¡;'. ~';'r'
I 0.410 Re. ,
,0
0 .sUI?VEY
: .
FOR'
c. 0 F. K'EFRUVEI<,.~,l "04
01=. o..sZOAe.eJ!; r~.,qCT.
,TO 8:E &ONYEY~D, TO 0
H/7ROlD "I.' ,LÌ)NG" ç DAviD ~ lÒM6
O£,/NG .A POE'r,/IJN()F st.O~~ /3
~Ap "r" éioxL.~Y H/.l.L. ... .P:S.S,JI'.Z1l>
'". /!rOANOKe COc/'V7V, YR-
. , . .:5cø/e: r".' "O~ Ja'). /5 JrJ~
.e~",'$ t"': Ap"" ~ 19tø '. c: e,./lf¡~¿ 0 C."t!~/' ,. ,
, Þ.¡;7A~. ¡:ri~r ,ç./hotl'... "1:3. P.P.:A"¿'..J
~ Sl-.'T~ C ~,.I. l!,-;tt.l:
'.
,';-'-"' '.'-:-':'::'0 '---r: ":---
-.'-.---., .
...~
!
'0
-J
:":-:7"" -=::::.:::::::=----""'---
~C)
~ ~,
: CI¿'
.,~!
~~
,,~
~~
~~
';:::!
o~
.
I...--
---'-
'0
.'.
-t1
¡
tXJ
-. ". . ~ ...~.......
&- Ga:mes
15.
605
Rt.1844
5.
626
624 -
6.
5626
~Wl ~
'1""'"
1. <:&:'>11 ~
630
3.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants naTne: Star City CoTnics
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2
Tax Map No 38.10-6- t 2,18, t 9,20
~
~
i;:::'.
~
{/1
0
';j
~
p..
::u
;to
,....
.....
i
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
XI-f)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge tH
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by District)
The following one-year terms will expire on August 31, 2004: Barbara Fasnacht,
Catawba Magisterial District; Dawn Erdman, Cave Spring Magisterial District; Jason
Perdue, Hollins Magisterial District; Mike Roop, Vinton Magisterial District; the late Lee
B. Eddy, Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
2. Library Board (Appointed by District)
Ms. Connie Goodman, who represents the Vinton Magisterial District, has resigned.
Her four-year term will expire December 31,2004.
3. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
The following three-year terms expired on June 30, 2004: David A. Thompson, Hollins
Magisterial District, and Bobby G. Semones, Vinton Magisterial District.
'"
II-5
4. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community Advisory
Committee (CAC)
The late Lee B. Eddy served on this committee without a term limit. The County has
three representatives on this Committee and the Board is asked to appoint a citizen
and/or representative of the community, business, education, health care or civic
interests rather than staff members.
5. Social Services Advisory Board (Appointed by District)
The four-year term of Janet Green, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, will expire August
1,2004.
'"
2
J\-5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27,2004
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN
CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED
AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 27,
2004, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes - June 22 and July 13, 2004
2. Request from schools to appropriate laptop fees in the amount of $216,600 for
2004-2005
3. Request to adopt a resolution requesting the Transportation Commissioner and
the Virginia Department of Transportation to review the following street location
for a "Watch for Children" sign, pursuant to Section 33.1-210.2, Code of Virginia:
each end of StarmountAvenue between Barrens Road and Alpine Road, Hollins
Magisterial District
4. Request from the Department of Social Services to appropriate $27,177 from the
state for fiscal year 2004-2005 for the Child Day Care Quality Initiative Grant
5. Request to amend resolution 062204-4.d to accept and approve the Virginia
Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) grant for fiscal year 2004-
2005 and to allow participation by the City of Salem
That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law
to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant
to this resolution.
'"
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
:r-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from schools to appropriate laptop fees in the amount.
of $216,600 for 2004-2005
Dr. Jane James
Director of Technology
Elmer C. Hodge I'N
County Administrator
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Last year, students participating in the laptop program paid an annual fee according to the
following fee structure:
Annual fee for use of laptop
Annual fee for student on reduced lunch
Annual fee for student on free lunch
$85
$40
$20
Students who needed to do so were allowed to make quarterly or semi-annual payments of
the above fees.
This fee structure continues to meet the needs of the laptop program and no changes are
recommended for the 2004-05 school year. Revenue is anticipated to be approximately
$216,600. The following budget allocation is recommended:
New and replacement laptop cases
Minor equipment replacement (batteries
and printers)
Student laptops - small parts
Teacher laptops - small parts
Insurance reserve
$56,000
$98,000
$ 8,000
$ 5,000
$49,600
'"
~-~
"
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will add $216,600 to the laptop budget for 2004-2005. In addition, there is
approximately $100,000 available to roll to the insurance reserve from 2003-2004.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the appropriation of $216,600 to the laptop budget for 2004-2005.
2. Do not approve the appropriation of funds to the laptop budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1, appropriation of $216,600 to the laptop budget for 2004-
2005.
'"
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
3-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution requesting the Transportation Commissioner and
the Virginia Department of Transportation to review the
following street location for a "Watch for Children" sign,
pursuant to Section 33.1-210.2, Code of Virginia: each end of
Starmount Avenue between Barrens Road and Alpine Road,
Hollins Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY:
Anthony W. Ford, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
Elmer C. Hodge (II
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Residents along Starmount Avenue, specifically the section between Barrens Road and
Alpine Road, have submitted a petition to the County staff requesting that a "Watch for
Children" sign be installed at each end of their street (see attached photo). The road does
meet criteria set forth in the County's "Watch for Children" sign policy, such as: this section
of Starmount Avenue is classified as Urban Local, the road length is approximately 1,200-ft,
and the traffic count is approximately 250 vehicles per day; all qualifying facts.
There are 21 homes along this section of Starmount Avenue and under the County's policy,
the submitted petition must include 75% of the property owners along said street. The
residents submitted 14 signatures, or 67% of the property owners. While the number of
submitted signatures is 2 short of the County's policy, the residents have made a concerted
effort to obtain signatures and determine if there were any objections to the sign
installation. To this date, the main point of contact, Ms. Dru Chocklett, has not received
any notification of opposition or disapproval of the sign installation. Of importance is the
fact that the submitted petition does include the signatures of those property owners
adjacent to the proposed sign location.
'"
1
~'-3
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the County. The residents along said street have agreed to pay
100% of the necessary amount for purchase and installation of the sign.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the request and forward the resolution to the Virginia Department of
Transportation to review the aforementioned street location for a "Watch for Children"
sign; final determination and installation of the signs based on Virginia Department of
Transportation's approval.
2. Do not approve the request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
2
:}"-3
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING
ON THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2004, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING:
RESOLUTION TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER
WHEREAS, the General Assembly enacted an amendment to the Code of Virginia,
adding Section 33.1-210.2 regarding the installation and maintenance of signs alerting
motorists that children may be at play nearby, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors along with the Virginia Department of
Transportation staff institute a local policy, and
WHEREAS, a petition has been received that meets both Roanoke County and the
Virginia Department of Transportation guidelines, and
WHEREAS, the property owners along Starmount Avenue (between Barrens Road
and Alpine Road) have agreed to fund the installation of the sign, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street
location to be reviewed for a "Watch for Children"sign, pursuant to Section 33.1-210.2,
Code of Virginia:
Sign location: Intersection of Starmount Avenue and Barrens Road and the
intersection of Starmount Avenue and Alpine Road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded
to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Recorded Vote
Moved By:
Seconded By:
Yeas:
Nays:
A Copy Teste:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
'"
, W+E
S
J-..
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
:J-L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from the Department of Social Services to appropriate
$27,177 from the state for fiscal year 2004-2005 for the Child
Day Care Quality Initiative Grant
SUBMITTED BY:
Dr. Betty R. McCrary
Director of Social Services
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge t H
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke County Department of Social Services receives, throughout the year,
additional appropriations for public assistance and services delivery. The state has made
available $27,177 in federal funds for the Child Day Care Quality Initiative Grant. The
Department of Social Services cannot access these funds until the County has
appropriated the same.
The Board of Supervisors is requested to appropriate $27,177 to the 2004-2005 Social
Services budget, line 60-51000, and to appropriate the same revenues from the state.
This is the seventh year the department has received this grant.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact; 100% federal and state reimbursement funds
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the acceptance of $27,177 for the Child Day Care Quality Initiative Grant
(budget line 60-5100) and appropriate same revenues from the state.
2. Do not approve the acceptance and appropriation of funds.
~-i
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
'"
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
J-5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to amend resolution 062204-4.d to accept and
approve the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act
(VJCCCA) grant for fiscal year 2004-2005 and to allow
participation by the City of Salem
SUBMITTED BY:
John M. Chambliss, Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge t /I
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On June 22, 2004, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County to participate in the
Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) program for FY 2004-05,
appropriated funding in the amount of $276,170, and authorized staffing of the grant
program for the fiscal year.
The City of Salem has requested to participate in the Life Skills Mentoring Program, which
is the major program operated by the Court Services Unit of the Juvenile Court utilizing
V JCCCA grant and related monies, and has approved their resolution to the Department of
Juvenile Justice requesting that their VJCCCA monies be used in that manner. This work
load can be assumed by the staff of the Life Skills Mentoring Program, and the additional
case load will be funded through Salem's grant funds.
The Department of Juvenile Justice has requested that a revised resolution be adopted
recognizing that the City of Salem's grant monies will be used to support the Life Skills
Mentoring Program. As operator of this program, the County of Roanoke will oversee the
fiscal responsibilities of the grant.
'"
~-5
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. The Board of Supervisors has already appropriated County
monies for the grant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution which will allow the Life Skills
Mentoring Program to be administered by the County's Court Service Unit, utilizing the
VJCCCA funds from both the City of Salem and County of Roanoke, to serve the youth
from both jurisdictions.
'"
~-5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TH BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY,VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON JULY 27,2004
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 062204-4.d AUTHORIZING
THE ACCEPTANCE OF VJCCCA FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-
2005 AND TO ALLOW PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY OF SALEM
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has participated in the Virginia Juvenile
Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) program in the past allowing the Court Service
Unit to provide direct services, treatment programs, substance abuse services and
probation activities associated with the Juvenile Court, and
WHEREAS, through the Life Skills Mentoring Program of our Court Services
Unit, the grant funds have been administered to assist the court by providing counseling
services, drug screens, intensive supervision, community service, restitution and other
needed services, and
WHEREAS, the Court Services Unit of the Juvenile Court serves the youth of
both the County of Roanoke and the City of Salem, and
WHEREAS, the Court Services Unit desires to provide services through the Life
Skills Mentoring Program to serve the youth of both the County of Roanoke and the City
of Salem utilizing the funding from the VJCCCA grant and other appropriate funds.
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County will participate in the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act
for Fiscal Year 2004-05 and will accept said funds, appropriating them for the purpose
set forth in this Act until it notifies the Department of Juvenile Justice, in writing, that it
no longer wishes to participate in the program.
'"
s-~
Be it further resolved that the County Administrator or the Assistant County
Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a local plan on behalf of the County of
Roanoke and City of Salem, and
Be it further resolved that the County of Roanoke will combine services and grant
resources with the City of Salem, and the County, as operator of the Life Skills
Mentoring Program, will serve as fiscal agent for these localities.
'"
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
N -,
% of General
Amount Fund
$9.758,688
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2004
July 1,2004
Explore Park Loan Repayment
20,000
Balance at July 27,2004
9,778,688
Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only.
Balance from above $9,778,688
$9,778,688
6.64%
6.64%
Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the
General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues
2004 - 2005 General Fund Revenues $147,255,793
6.25% of General Fund Revenues $9,203,487
Submitted By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By
Elmer C. Hodge t J/
County Administrator
'"
N~J
I CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Amount
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2004 $11,389,450.22
Balance at July 27,2004 $11,389,450.22
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By
Elmer C. Hodge t 1/
County Administrator
N-3
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Amount
From 2004-2005 Original Budget $100,000.00
Balance at July 27, 2004 $100,000.00
Submitted By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By
Elmer C. Hodge t#
County Administrator
'"
N-~
FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget
Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund
FY1997-1998 Original budget appropriation
Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund
FY1998-1999 Original budget appropriation
FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund
FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2001-2002 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Savings from 2001-02 debt fund
FY 2002-2003 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2003-2004 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2004-2005 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Balance at July 27, 2004
$ 670,000
1,113,043
2,000,000
321,772
2,000,000
2,000,000
(1,219,855) 780,145
495,363
2,000,000
(1,801,579) 198,421
2,000,000
(465,400)
116,594 1,651,194
2,000,000
(2,592,125) (592,125)
2,000,000
(2,202,725) (202,725)
2,000,000
(4,192,701) (2,192,701)
$ 6,242,387
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge ¿If
County Administrator
'"
ACTION NO.
N-f)
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Accounts Paid - June 2004
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge elf
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit Checks Total
Payments to Vendors $ $ $ 5,626,532.18
Payroll 6/4/2004 793,996.58 157,144.69 951 ,141 .27
Payroll 6/18/2004 823,074.16 155,856.69 978,930.85
Manual Checks 681.73 681 .73
Voids (10.57) (10.57).
Grand Total $ 7,557,275.46
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of SupeNisors.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
~-i.o
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Report of claims activity for the self-insurance program for the
fourth quarter ended June 30, 2004
SUBMITTED BY:
Robert C. Jernigan
Risk Manager
Elmer C. Hodge êR
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In accordance with the self-insurance program, Ordinance #61494-4, Section 2-86.C,
attached is the fiscal year-to-date claims activity report including the fourth quarter that
ended June 30, 2004. Attachment A - Auto; Attachment B - General Liability.
'"
SELF-INSURANCE TRUSTEES REPORT
FISCAL YEAR TO DATE: JULY 01,2003 - JUNE 30, 2004
AUTO
c'
Page 1 of 2
Attachment A
<
\
ã'
"
SELF-INSURANCE TRUSTEES REPORT
FISCAL YEAR TO DATE: JULY 01,2003 - JUNE 30, 2004
AUTO
3/4-138 I 05/16/04 I Police I Entering parking lot, struck other vehicle VACo Closed 1,136.40
3/4-140 I 05/18/04 ISolid Waste I Backing, struck other vehicle VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-154 I 06/14/04 I Police I Passing, collided with other vehicle VACo Closed 1,191.00
3/4-161 I 06/29/04 ¡Solid Waste ¡ Backing, struck other vehicle VACo Closed I I 750.00
<.::
I
<S"
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
SELF-INSURANCE TRUSTEES REPORT
FISCAL YEAR TO DATE: JULY 01, 2003 - JUNE 30, 2004
GENERAL LIABILITY
3/4-005 7/14/2003 Utility Water damage - 534 Ingal Blvd. VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-011 8/02/2003 Building Maintenanc Slip & fall on floor - Salem Bank & Trust Bldg. VACo Closed 0.00
. 2/3-143 I 5/02/2003 I Social Services Slip & fall in restroom VACo Closed 250.87
3/4-031 I 9/09/2003 IUtility Plumbing damaged - 5712 Spring Meadow Court, SW VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-046 I 10/06/2003 ¡Utility Water leak - 3444 Manassas Dr. VACo Closed 375.00
3/4-047 I 8/11/2003 ¡Utility Damaged buried cable - Verizon VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-059 I 11/13/2003 I Solid Waste Damaged fence rail - 8359 Brubaker Dr. VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-069 I 12/02/2003 ISolid Waste I Bikes picked up - 3935 Skylark Circle VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-083 I 1102/2004 ISolid Waste I Truck damaged - 6628 Wendover Rd. Risk Manager Closed 50.00
3/4-094 I 1/06/2004 IUtility Damaged buried cable - Verizon VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-104 I 12/09/2003 I Library Slip & fall on parking lot - Headquarters Library VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-121 I 4/12/2004 I Library Citizen struck curb in Headquarters parking lot and damaged vehicle VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-124 I 4/19/2004 ¡Solid Waste Trash cart struck parked vehicle - 5406 Flintlock Ln. VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-125 I 4/17/2004 I Parks/Recreation I Wind blown tent struck parked vehicles - Green Hill Park VACo Closed 6,419.76
3/4-131 ¡ 4/29/2004 I Utility Water damage - 6225 Nell Circle VACo Open 6,000.00 0.00
3/4-136 I 11/19/2003 I Building Maintenanc Slip & fall on open walkway entering Roanoke County Courthouse VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-142 I 5/11/2004 ISolid Waste Building materials picked up - 920 Charwood Circle VACo Closed 0.00
3/4-143 I 5/25/2004 I Solid Waste ITrash cart rolled, struck & damaged vehicle - 7737 Bent Mtn Rd. VACo Closed 2,081.89
3/4-156 5/27/2004 RCAC Trip and fall in Administration building VACo Closed 0.00
"
.
-<
a--
Page 1 of 1 Attachment B
N --1
DECLARING SEPTEMBER 27, 2004, AS
FAMILY DAY - A DAY TO EAT DINNER WITH YOUR CHILDREN
IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
WHEREAS, the use of illegal drugs and the abuse of alcohol and nicotine
constitute the greatest threats to the well-being of America's
children; and
WHEREAS, surveys have found that children and teenagers who routinely eat
dinner with their families are less likely to use illegal drugs, alcohol
and cigarettes; and
WHEREAS, these surveys found that teenagers who rarely eat dinner with their
families are 72 percent more likely than the average teenager to use
illegal drugs, alcohol and cigarettes; and
WHEREAS, teenagers who almost always eat dinner with their families are 31
percent less likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs,
alcohol and cigarettes; and
WHEREAS, the correlation between family dinners and reduced risk for teen
substance abuse are well documented, and parental. influence is
known as one of the most crucial factors in determining the
likelihood of substance abuse by teenagers; and
WHEREAS, Family Day, which was established in 2001 by the National Center on
Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University and is
celebrated on the fourth Monday of September, emphasizes the
importance of regular family activities in parent-child communication
and encourages Americans to make family dinners a regular feature
of their lives.
NOW THEREFORE, I, Richard C. Flora, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim and recognize
September 27,2004, as FAMILY DAY - A DAY TO EAT DINNER WITH
YOUR CHILDREN in the County of Roanoke; and
FURTHER urge all citizens to observe Family Day by making family dinners a
regular part of their children's lives.
~J.~
¡Jders, Clerk
~ ,ù-..s> c. ~ <:N "-
Richard C. Flora, Chairman
&~ If ~y--
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
~
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
0-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Senior Citizens Hall of Fame Awards
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge l II
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 7~ ~ ~ ~
""\~~~.?t:~1~~~ ~
~ ~J.d; ~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside to recognize senior citizens for their contributions to the
community. This is the 19th year of the Hall of Fame awards, and the eighth time that the
awards have been presented at a Board of Supervisors meeting. The Board members
have been given information about the presentation and recipients. The many contributions
of these volunteers are always impressive, and we are grateful for their work in Roanoke
County.
The Hall of Fame was established to give recognition to Roanoke County residents, who
are 60 years of age or older, for their volunteer efforts that have improved the quality of life
in our community. A Special Award Category was also established to recognize one
community-minded business, agency or organization that operates for profit, non-profit or
on a volunteer basis. This nominee must provide a service to the senior citizen population
or have as a statement of purpose, the inclusion of community betterment in some form.
The ceremony is coordinated by the Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department, under the
direction of Myra Sellers. Following the awards ceremony, there will be a reception on the
fourth floor of the Administration Center honoring this year's award recipients.
'"
0'- (
Senior Citizens Hall of Fame Awards
The 18th annual Roanoke County Senior Citizens Hall of Fame will be held on
July 27, 2004 following the Board of Supervisors meeting. There will be three
awards presented in the individual category, two of which are for groups that
have done significant work at Camp Roanoke. There were no nominations for
the special category.
There will be a reception on the 4th floor of the Administration Center after the
awards presentations to recognize the following individuals:
Judith Ashcraft
Judith has devoted her life in service to others. As an educator, she was named
"A Child Advocate of Virginia" by Governor Charles Robb for her tireless work on
behalf of children with learning disabilities. In 1978, Ms. Ashcraft was named
"Mother of the Year Professional".
She has dedicated the same energy in her work to benefit the low-income,
uninsured population. As a volunteer for the Bradley Free Clinic, Ms. Ashcraft
has contributed many hours creating awareness of and raising funds to support
the Clinic. Each week, she volunteers at the Clinic in a staff support role more
than any other administrative volunteer.
Recently, a Free Clinic diabetic patient was diagnosed with advanced Charcot
joint disease in the left foot and early Charcot disease in the right foot which
rendered him unable to walk without severe pain. A doctor at the Clinic ordered
orthopedic diabetic shoes and custom made orthodics which the patient could
not afford. Upon learning of this patient's circumstances, Ms. Ashcraft made
arrangements to have the patient fitted and donated the cost for the equipment.
Nearly 40 % of the uninsured have no regular source of health care, and,
coupled with the fear of high medical bills, many may delay or forego needed
care. These decisions can lead to more serious illness and avoidable health
problems. The Bradley Free Clinic provides free access to free healthcare
services for low-income, uninsured families in the Roanoke Valley to give
patients better health outcomes and avoid medical bad debt.
The Bradley Free Clinic provides $3.2 million annually in value of services and
relies heavily on individual donations as they receive no federal funding. Without
volunteers like Judith, the Clinic would be hard pressed to do as much as they do
to make Roanoke Valley a healthier community and help maintain a healthy
workforce.
'"
\)- \
Phillip Boqqs
Phillip retired from the JC Penney Company just as the Rescue Mission began
planning its new Thrift Store. Phil spent countless hours meeting with the
Mission staff and volunteers to draw and layout the new store. Phil begged and
borrowed (the Mission had to draw the line at stealing) in order to put together a
thrift store that could compete with retail stores in the local malls. Due to his
connections, vision, marketing ability and experience, he was able to recycle
racks, dump tables, cash registers, etc. to get the store ready for opening day.
He accomplished this task working with a volunteer crew as they worked in and
around the construction crew who were also trying to finish on time.
After the building was completed, Phil recruited and led a dynamite crew of
volunteers to set up the new store in a department store style, taking the Thrift
Store to a new level in our community. As the Thrift Store continues to grow and
expand, Phil has been there on a daily basis to help set up systems for
distribution, loading, pick-up and deliveries. He has been involved in helping to
market the store to potential donors. He has developed systems to recruit and
maintain volunteers as well as make the best use of staff time. He is inspired with
new ideas almost daily to make this operation trim and fit and profitable without
losing its charitable character and mission.
Phil's spirit of volunteerism is contagious. This is evident in the loyal band of
volunteers he leads at the Thrift Store. The Rescue Mission is blessed to have
someone of Phil's caliber in this key leadership volunteer position.
In addition to the Rescue Mission Thrift Store, Phil was the key man for two other
charitable projects: The Discovery Store for the American Cancer Society, and
the Art on a Mission Store at Tanglewood Mall, a store handling art on
consignment from more than 300 local artists to benefit the free clinic at the
Rescue Mission.
During the past year Phil has faced a number of health challenges, but he
continues to think and plan and mentor the staff of the Thrift Store. The staff at
the Rescue Mission is thankful to know and work with this man and his lovely
wife Geneva, who probably deserves an award too. With each project Phil takes
on, Geneva works with him and does so with a smile and a cheerful word for
everyone.
James J. Grimes
James has lived in Roanoke County for 43 years. He was a Scoutmaster of
Troop 236 and District Scout Commissioner. He served twice as a Big Brother
and also served on the Board of Directors of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. He
secured a $24,000 grant from the GE Foundation to provide the first computer
lab in the County for Glen Cove Elementary School.
'"
0-\
He initiated the project "Computers for School" in 1993, and has been Project
Leader since its inception. This project procures unwanted PCs from local
businesses, cleans them up, and repairs them as necessary, before placing them
in school systems. Most County schools have been recipients and several
networked labs have also been installed.
From 1993 to 2004 a total of over 5000 computers have been placed in seven
school districts, as well as in most non-profit organizations in the valley.
Under his leadership, the GE Elfun Volunteers provided 120 computers for 10
local schools in 2002. In 2003, 140 computers were provided for 22 non-profit
organizations, 7 of which are devoted to education. Local recipients are: Apple
Ridge Farms, Act /I Friendship House, Veterans Facility, LOA, Turning Point, and
the Rescue Mission. Thirty computers were placed with a laboratory at Oak Hill
Academy in North Carolina.
Mr. Grimes has also served as Project Administrator for the Regional Chamber of
Commerce's "Project 2000 Technology Upgrade Program", which had similar
goals to those of the "Computers for Schools" project.
Since he retired from GE nine years ago, he has also been an Instructor and Site
Chief with TaxAid for the elderly, which helps older Americans with their Income
Tax Forms.
The importance of participation in TaxAid, Boy Scouts, and Big Brothers is well-
known, but Mr. Grimes' initiatives are of particular significance in his efforts to
provide individual computers and to establish computer labs. He and his fellow
GE retirees recognized that the changes in technology in recent years made it
imperative to educate our children in computer technology. They have spared no
effort to make the necessary equipment available to them.
As a result of Mr. Grimes' efforts, literally thousands of children, and adults as
well, have received a better education and have been better equipped to meet
not only the demands of the work force but also those of higher education.
Roanoke Valley Community Band: (Wilbur Grant, Conductor)
The Community Band is a 50 piece Orchestra style band that performs for
retirement and nursing homes and other groups at no charge. They present very
professional performances and have a lot of fun doing so.
It is great to have this level of professional entertainment for the residents of
retirement and nursing homes. Good music can be enjoyed by everyone, no
matter what your physical condition.
'"
a-I
The Community Band usually has a patriotic program they perform in the
summer and a Holiday Program they present in December. Professional
performances do not come without practice and this group devotes a lot of time
to practice. The performing comes from the heart and each member takes joy
from giving pleasure to their audiences. It is obvious to the residents of the
homes that the band enjoys what they do.
Sue Hodqe
Sue has given much of her time as a volunteer Director of choirs and choral
groups in the area. She directs the Caroloa Choir and the Simplicity Singers
from the local Mormon Church. They perform all around the Roanoke Valley for
free.
The various choirs she directs perform for many nursing homes, retirement
homes, and other groups. Both choirs are very professional and brighten the
lives of so many people.
Sue is upbeat, vivacious and creative. She helps the performers provide very
entertaining and professional quality shows. The choirs benefit from her
knowledge and her positive attitude. The folks who come to the programs
thoroughly enjoy them and their day is made a little more special. Brandon Oaks
is one of the homes that the Caroloa Choir and the Simplicity Singers visit
several times each year. The residents love and appreciate them very much.
Sue also volunteers at Explore Park doing any number of jobs, for several days a
week.
James (Jim) Deaton
Jim Deaton is always ready to lend a helping hand to Habitat and does so in
many ways. This past year he was the house leader on 3 houses. He helped
build a Habitat Float which was entered in two Christmas parades. He helped
retrofit a new trailer which will be used at work sites to store supplies and tools.
He helped build the base for a Plexiglas house which is situated outside Sears at
Valley View Mall. The house is a donation point for the community to assist
Habitat in sponsoring another house.
Habitat for Humanity in the Roanoke Valley works to improve the lives of God's
families in need by providing affordable quality homes in partnership with
homeowners and volunteers for the enhancement of our community. Habitat
helps rid our community of substandard housing by building decent homes and
communities for those who might not otherwise be able to qualify for a loan to
buy a house.
'"
(J-(
Through all Jim's volunteer projects, he works closely with the homeowners and
volunteers, including TAP youth, to build a quality home and teach construction
skills they can use in the future. He also makes sure all are conscious of
Habitat's Christian mission in whatever they are doing. Jim not only helps
change the lives of the homeowners but also the lives of the volunteers.
Mike Harvey
On an almost daily basis, Mike Harvey gives time, effort and attention to friends,
family, the elderly and those shut-in or sick. When he hears of those in need of a
visit or help with a task, Mike is there. He will frequently bring flowers in a small
vase and simply leave them on a kitchen or family room table. If Mike learns that
someone is sick in the hospital or at home, he will stop by for a visit and words of
comfort and sometimes will leave a small treat, cookie or snack. When flowers
are left from an event at Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church, Mike arranges them
for the elderly, shut-ins, and friends and has even taken his creations to the
Carillon Breast Care Center and Cancer Center.
Mike also has a passion and talent for flower gardening and has planted literally
hundreds of flowers for elderly friends who otherwise would not have a garden.
He also waters and nurtures each garden throughout the season.
There is a story about a man on a beach littered with many starfish. The man is
picking up the starfish and throwing them back into the ocean before they die. A
young boy sees him and asks him what he is doing. The man replies that he is
trying to save the starfish before the sun comes up and kills them. The boy says
that there are so many that are going to die that what he is doing won't make a
difference. The man replies "It made a difference to that one".
Mike sees each person as a starfish and makes them a priority, one at a time,
face to face, and lets them know they are special and someone cares. He
believes that giving to others and making a difference in even one life is
important.
'"
K
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 27,2004
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
'"
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
C?J- \
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 27,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution of appreciation to Donald L. Davis, former Mayor of
the Town of Vinton, for services to the Roanoke Valley
Elmer C. Hodge t /~
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside to present a resolution of appreciation to Donald L. Davis for
his 15 years of public service in the Town of Vinton. Former Mayor Davis was first elected
to the Vinton Town Council in 1986; serving two terms from July 1, 1986, through June 30,
1994. He was then appointed to fill the unexpired term of a deceased Council Member in
1997. Mr. Davis was elected as Mayor of Vinton in 2000 and retired from that office on
June 30, 2004.
Former Mayor Davis was a proponent of regional cooperation and worked with Roanoke
County on various joint projects including the Gain Sharing Agreement, development of the
Vinton Business Center, and viewshed protection for the Blue Ridge Parkway. He also
served on various regional committees as well as taking an active role in the Vinton
Chamber of Commerce, the Vinton Lions Club, and the Vinton Dogwood Festival
Committee.
Former Mayor Davis is expected to be present to receive his resolution.
'"
1
S-I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27,2004
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRI;CIA TION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO DONALD L. DAVIS,
FORMER MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF VINTON, FOR SERVICES TO THE
ROANOKE VALLEY
WHEREAS, Donald L. Davis was elected to the Vinton Town Council in 1986
and served two terms as Council Member from July 1, 1986, through June 3D, 1994; and
was appointed to complete a third term in 1997; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Davis was elected Mayor of Vinton in 2000, serving from
July 1, 2000, until he retired from office at the end of his term on June 30, 2004; and
WHEREAS, during his terms of office, Mayor Davis served with dedication
and distinction working to create a better quality of life not only for the citizens of the Town
of Vinton but for all citizens of the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Davis actively promoted regional cooperation and worked
with Roanoke County officials on joint projects to the benefit of both localities including:
~ the Gain Sharing Agreement between the County and Town,
~ development of the Vinton Business Center,
~ viewshed protection for the Blue Ridge Parkway; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Davis served on various committees including Chairman
of the Roanoke Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, Vice-Chairman of the Roanoke
Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Executive Committee, the Fifth Planning District
Regional Alliance, and the Explore Technical Committee; and
'"
1
&)
WHEREAS, in addition to his public service, Mayor Davis is a past president
and current board member of the Vinton Chamber of Commerce, a member and past
president of the Vinton Lions Club, and past president of the Vinton Dogwood Festival
Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke
County, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation to DONALD L. DAVIS for his years of
service and for his dedication to maintaining the high quality of life for all the people of the
Roanoke Valley; and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does hereby
extend its best wishes to Mr. Davis for continued success in his future endeavors.
2
T-I
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Balzer & Associates
12-5/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2004 (Continued from May 4, 2004)
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 24, 2004 (Continued from May 25, 2004)
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Balzer & Associates, Inc. to rezone 4.83 acres from 11 C Industrial
District with Conditions to R 1 Low Density Residential District for a development of
single family housing located at Tract B1-A-2 of Mason Subdivision, Hollins
Magisterial District. (Continued at the request of the Planning Commission)
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D.
CONDITIONS
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
A IT ACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
'"
\-d
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Comprehensive Plan
7/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 7, 2004(Continued from July 6,2004)
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 28, 2004 (Continued from July 27,
2004)
A.
REQUEST
Public Hearing to receive public comments on a proposal to adopt a revised
Community (Comprehensive) Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia. The proposed
Community Plan is comprised of both text and maps. Once recommended by the
Planning Commission and adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the plan will serve as
a general guide for a long range use and development of all land within Roanoke
County. The proposed plan has been prepared in accordance with guidelines
contained in Sections 15.2-2223 and 2224 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 30-8-1
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Eight citizens spoke. Concerns were expressed regarding the following: 1) rural
densities should be increased; 2) Section 2232 review should not be required; 3) need
more residential development; 4) need more specific information and more time to
review it; 5) need more citizen participation; 6) transportation section needs to be
more closely linked to growth management section; 7) rural areas need to be
preserved.
In addition, Mr. Bob Flynn spoke representing the Roanoke Regional Home Builders
Association. He expressed concern that the areas projected for growth will not be
areas where land is available for sale or that the land may not be developable. His
organization is concerned with any form of an urban service boundary.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission expressed thanks to citizens for their continued participation in the
process.
D.
CONDITIONS
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Voted to continue this petition for 60 days.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
'"
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
3
\-3
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Sam & Mercedes Hardy
18-6/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
July 6,2004 (Continued from June 1, 2004)
July 27,2004 (Continued from June 22, 2004)
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Sam L. and Mercedes P. Hardy to rezone 1.3 acres from AG3
Agricultural Preserve District to PRD Planned Residential District and rezone 97 acres
from AR Agricultural Residential District to PRD Planned Residential District, located
south of Whistler Drive and Creek Circle and east of Apple Grove Lane, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Ms. Amy Murray, 7131 Lodi Lane asked if anymore homes than the proposed plan
would be allowed to be developed on the site. Mr. Lowe said no because the site plan
would be proffered. No other citizens spoke.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. Chris Lowe presented the petition and explained that each planning commissioner
visited the site. Mr. Lowe explained that the area does not fall under the Blue Ridge
Parkway View shed. Mr. Lowe said he along with Ms. Scheid visited the parkway
overlooks and felt that the homes proposed would not be seen from the parkway
during summer conditions (full foliage) and that he could not say if they would be
visible during the winter. Mr. Lowe explained what Mr. Hardy could do by right with
the current zoning and explained that this is an actual downzoning that would be
reducing the amount of homes that would typically be allowed on this property.
D.
D. CONDITIONS
1. Minimum of 18' paved width with 2' shoulders for private road.
2. Maximum 16% grade for private road.
3. Development must be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan
dated, 4/21/2004.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. AI Thomason made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request.
Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
2
\-3
. ':è;f:,'kx~;,;,":?"::'-:,W;:~:¡;~:~'S3Xttijl~:r""'~""~"~!¡,1~,;~"
Petitioner:
Sam L. Hardy Jr. & Mercedes P. Hardy
5954 Landview Drive
Roanoke~ VA 24018
Request:
Rezoning from AR & AG-3 to PRD
Magisterial District:
Proffers:
Whistler Creek Circle - Applegrove
Windsor Hills
Location:
1. Minimum of 18' paved width for private road.
2. Maximum of 16% grade for private road.
3. Development must be developed in substantial conformity with the
concept plan dated, 4/21/2004;
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a rezoning request from AR & AG-3 to PRD for 97.543 acres, at Whistler Creek Circle &
Applegrove. The majority of the property, approximately 96 acres is zoned AR, Agriculture
Residential and the remaining acreage (approximately 1-1 Yz) is zoned AG-3. The property is
designated as Rural Preserve in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The petitioner
requests to rezone the entire tract.
1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Building Permits for Single Family Homes Required.
V DOT Entrance Approval Required.
Site Plan Approval. .
Floodplain study may be required during site plan review.
Current AR zoning allows 1 Acre Lots with private well and sewer.
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Topo~aphvN egetation - The property consists of 90% timbered woodland. The tract was cut
approximately 5 years ago. The topography is generally steep and rolling. Because of the size of
the tract it has a few ridgelines as well as varying degrees of slopes. A stream runs through
approximately 36 acres of the property which is being designated as open space. A floodplain
study may be required during site plan review.
Surrounding Neighborhood - Approximately 50% of the adjoining properties are vacant
woodlands. AG-3 zoned properties adjoin to the west~ south~ and east~ and AR zoned properties
adjoin to the north.
'"
1
\=-3
3.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Background - Current conceptual plans show a subdivision of 12 lots with 1;ìingle family
residences, approximately 36 acres of open space, and 3 out parcels. Anticipated use is single-
. family homes utilizing the natural terrain and specific site criteria for design. The petitioner
proposes that site plans for each individual lot will be required and must be developed by a
certified landscape architect, and will be subject to the developer's approval. The petitioner also
proposes that natural exterior materials and colors are to blend in with the natural woodland
setting, houses will not be built on steep slopes and houses will have a minimum of 1600 square
feet and be limited in height of 45 feet and shall be sensitive to the surrounding view sheds.
Site Layout/Architecture - No building site is visible to any of the existing adjoining homes. No
houses will be closer than 150 feet to one another within the development. The conceptual plan
shows a private road which serves the 12 single family lots.
Access/Traffic Circulation - V DOT states that the development of this single-family residential
subdivision will increase the traffic from this site. A minimum sight distance of 390 feet on
Route 937 will be required in either direction and will be addressed during site plan review.
Roanoke County Traffic Engineer - Mr. Ford does not feel that the increase of traffic
(approximately 120 trips per day) is significant enough to cause a point of concern. Mr. Ford
does recommend that the proposed 16-ft- private road be increased to 18-ft to allow for easier
passage ofvehic1es that may meet on this private road. Mr. Ford also recommends that the
applicant meet all county standards set forth in the "Public Street and Parking Design Standards
and Specifications". These specifications require an 18-ft paved road with 2' shoulders and a
maximum grade of 16%.
Fire & RescuelUtilities -Fire and rescue services will continue, as they currently exist and should
not adversely impact Fire and Rescue call volume at this time. Fire and Rescue does have
concerns with the plans only showing one means of entry and exit into this subdivision because
of it's location in a wildland/interface area and is heavily wooded. Fire and Rescue recommends
building materials for roofbe asphalt or "Fire Retardant" wood shake shingles because of the
possibility of a wildland fIre in this area. Fire and Rescue also recommend brick or stucco
exterior walls for the same reasons. Fire and Rescue also recommend driveways that would be
wide enough for a Fire and Rescue Apparatus to get up and down without difficulty.
Public water and sanitary sewer is not currently available. This petition does not affect the
existing public water and sanitary sewer systems.
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The site is designated as Rural Preserve in the 1998 Community Plan. Rural Preserve designated
land use areas are where preservation options and certain design strategies can be followed which
would allow future development but leave land available for productive agricultural acivities and
open space, and preserve rural views and vistas.
This petition is consistent with the Rural Preserve designation of the' Roanoke County
Community Plan. '"
2
T-3
5.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
This is a request to obtain a rezoning from AR & AG-3 to PRD for the construction of 12 single
family homes and 3 outparce1s. The request involves a 97.543 acre tract off of Whistler Creek
Circle. . The petitioner's request is consistent with the policies and guidelines of the Roanoke
County Community Plan. The site has ample space to confonn to all applicable development
standards.
CASE NUMBER: 18-6/2004
PREPARED BY: Chris Lowe
HEARING PC: June 1, 2004
DATES:
BOS: June 22, 2004
'"
3
, .
~-3
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
P]aw-ds issued:
~c~ivcd by:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoket VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Casl: Number
ì,":::'~'.-"':~":"'-:':""""""" """""""""".."..., ",-"',"""""',
\~ ;'~:fl?f~~r:s. ..,....."..",-,..,..::,'~,..,:,',~....,..."".."""",_...."......,..'..".."..",
Chæk type of applicmon f11ed (check all that appJy)
ffRezonmg 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Admin.istrarlve Appeal
Applicants name/address w/zip . Phone: ..,,4 -C:¡C;I,
~\V\ L. \-\.M2.1:)"( :m. ~'74 Lt\w4D~1~ ~ ~~~: :;¿z.: ~7ÍG.°
KfZ(Z.CtZ.:Ptt.~ ? HA'iZO"{ ~oA.NÞ"t= ~4Óig Fax No.: 34'2.- ~,41
Application fcl::
Owner's nam~address w/zip
4A.M~
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No. #:
Property Lot:mon , . \
WI4IIrLli./l. - C!~ft£1£ (2l1tC.LrG.. Magisterial District: w \ ~"'V~o'2.. t4.\LL S
Af'ftli~¡t,OIlf: Community PlaIming area:
Tax Map No.: A
.03 - 2- 1'1 ¡C/.! $3 Existing Zomng: ,..{Z ~ A.Ga 3-
Size ofparce1(s): Acres: '17,'543 (ez Existmg Land Use:
::~~~:"::~':;-":~'~g.P.k¿tß usip.~kMtriijj)wiiii~iiÌr&73¡lii¡:l6~í§ÍW1 ,,'" ,....,' . ..~" -"".. -.... ", , ": '-P"', ,,' '"
'. :;¿~:,:!:",-,~-~; ;:: ": ,'-;, :""":-~::'-"'-" ;:.i~..;:.', :':'-':<.t'J.¿f\'!:'.! "':::::::~'Lf::r"- ",,,"'i',;;.r~:V:Z1..::~..:'~'L -,"':":"':-,--.....-..:..-....,...-" ---,--.----.. '
Proposed Zoning: P!<'P ,"
Proposed Land Use: 12 £~~ 'â'jJ%~ ':¡,gI'1 ðMf¡;fl1:£'l:-
Does the p~cel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requiremems of the requested district?
Yes r/' No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQumED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes /' No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST ...dÁ.
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ No
,..--"-~,~,-,.o,.."."",,-,, .'.0"'," """'-"'.'-"'-i'~,"'~"'.""'_"""-"._".'---'-'"-.,.."'"'~"',"_."-"""..."--..._".,--,,... "_-".""""'..--'-""""'-'¥'..,.,""-
~::~imtJf.~~ ~,J@-~~¡@f.~~~tt_w.Œ~~L~,..~J J.,~.~~;~, '-';~~'- "..~-~-i..:..:.",~:
Varl.anceIWaivCT ofSecrlon(s) of the RoanDke Cow!)' Zomng OrdinaDCe in order to:
Appeal of Zoning AdministratOr's decisiOJl to
Appeal of Interpretation of Secrlon(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning OrdiDmce
Is the application complete? Please check if encJosed. APPLICATION WJLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF TEESE
ITEMS .ARE MIS5mG OR INCOMPLETE.
"VSfW V/}...A Rlsrw V/A..J... IUS/W V/AA
~ Consultation g 1/2. x 11. ~ODcept plan E8 Application fee
. Application Metes aDd beu:cds description' Proffers. if applicable:
Jusrlficmon Water and. sewer a.ppJic:ation I AdjoiIún.g property O'WDcTs
. I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the O'WI1e.r's agent or comract purcluser and am ¡u;ting with the knowledge aDd'
cement of the Dwn:r. ~, .9. ø~ I Owner's Signature
-- -------
, '~3
r-""'-""':""" ,... '-"""..,"..-.." ,..-..,...., ""","""""",""""'-"""'.- "",,'.,..,.. """"""""'1
~,oo'N(fË:WJ; 'PLAN'- CHECKLISt . : .
~,,:':':::.;':':':.:",,:"..:',,-',,' .,:, "",:.".,.....,~.....,.._...."..."-,,..¡-- '-......-.:.., """"""""""-'--"'-'---"-""'...,...-.........."""'"""..,.'
A toncept plan of th~ proposed project must be submitted with. the application. The concc:pt plan shall grapmcally depict th~
land use change, development or variance that is tD be considered. F1U1her, the plan sh.a11 address any potential land use or
design issues arismg from the request. In ruch cases involving rezonings, the app1i~t may proffer c:onditions to limit the
future use and development of the property and by so doing, c:orrect any deficiencies that may not be maDageable by COUDty
permitting regulatioDS.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site p1ID1 or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building
p~it. Site plan and building permit procedures emure compliance with State and County development regc1ations and may
require cha.Dges to the 1Dítial'concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted m a rezoning or imposed on
a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pemútted by the zonmg district and other
reguWioDS.
A concept plan is required with all rezonmg, special use perinÏt, waiver and va.riance applications. The plan should be
prepared by a professjonal site planner. The level of detail. my vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County
Planning Division. staff may exempt some of the: items or roggest the addition of extra it~, but the following are comidered
minimum.: '
ALL APPUCANTS
./ a. Applicant name and Dame of development
/ b. Date. ~aJ.e and north arrow
/' c. Lot sÎ.ZC; in acres or square feet and dimensioILS
L d. Location, æmes of owners and Roalloke CO\JJlty tax mzp munbers of adjoinIDg properties
/ c. Physical features such as ground cover, natural wa1erCO1JI'ses, floodplaiD., etc.
/ f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properrles
/ g. All property line$ and easements
./ h. All buildlDgs, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area ~ heights
/ i. Location, widths aDd names of all ex1sting or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the developmem
/ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPliCANTS
W! k.
JL'L
/m.
~n.
1--4. {tJ. o.
ZP.
Þ:LIP: q.
E1:ÍStiDg utilities (water, sewer, storm drams) and connecrloILS at the site
A11y driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and CrDssovers
Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
Approximate street grades and site distances a.t intersections
Locations of all adjacent me hydrants
Ally proffer~ conditions at the site and how they are addressed
If project is to be phased, pj~e show phase schedule
I certify tha.t all items requiTed in the checklist a.bove are complete.
)<::7~ ~ 41~ ~I
Signature of applicant
4/1.7..-/64-
Dà.te
\-3
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REZONING REQUEST
The subject tract of this PRD consists of97 acres oftimbered woodland. The timber
on about 90% of this trac.1 was cut about 5 years ago. Already, the site is showing positive
signs ofœtural regeneration of the forest. Over 50% of the adjoining boundary is vacant
woodland. A large portion of the proposed 36 acre open space was not timbered and has a
pristine mountain stream floWing thru. It is the intent to keep this area in an untouched
state for all in the development to enjoy. The highlight of the development is the
spectular views of the valley and the surrounding mountains and the extensive walking
trails thru the 36 acre open space. By limiting the number of home sites we feel this is
the highest and best use of the land.
- 1-
This request furthers the purpose of the Roanok~ County AR zoning ordinance by
offering very low density of single family residences utilizing the natural terrain in a
gentle way. The site is outside the urban service area ( only 6.5 miles to Cave Spring
Corners) but convenient to major retail, office space, restaurants, and major medical
facilities, Agriculture will not be encouraged because of the wooded nature ofthis tract.
- 2-
The developer will oversee the development by requiring an individual site plan on
each lot. The site plan will be developed by an approved landscape architect and will be
subject to the developers approval fonowing specific site criteria. That is, houses will
be required to use natural exterior materials and colors to blend in with the natural
'"
\-3
woodland setting. Houses are not to be built on steep slopes. Hous~s will have a
minimum of 1600 square feet and be limited in height of 45 feet and to be sensitive to the
surrounding view sheds. All of the building sites are not visible to any of the
adjoining existing homes. Furthermore, no houses will be closer than 150 feet to another
house within the development. Yard space will be limited to allow the forest to
regenera.te which will assure privacy between the home sites. No temporary structures
shall be used as a residence at any time.
3-
There will be no impact on the adjoining properties because the home sites are not
in close proximity or visible to them. The home sites will have private well and septic,
underground electric, telephone and cable thus not requiring any public infrastructure.
The streets will be private and maintained by the homeowners association .Because of the
low density and targeted market of retirees there will be minimal impact on the schools.
Fire and rescue will not be strained because of the low density .Parks and recreation will
be provided within the de,:elopment by the walking trails.
Street grades at intersections are 5 %. Site distances are 350 feet or more. Streets in the
development are within a 50 foot right of way. See the typical road section for details.
'"
T-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 27,2004
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.3-
ACRE AND A 97-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED SOUTH
OF WHISTLER DRIVE AND CREEK CIRCLE AND EAST OF APPLE
GROVE LANE (TAX MAP NOS. 95.03-2-19, 19.2, AND 33) IN THE
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF AG3 AND AR, RESPECTIVELY, TO THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PRD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF SAM L. AND MERCEDES P. HARDY
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 25, 2004, and the
second reading and public hearing were held June 22, 2004 and continued to July 27,
2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on July 6, 2004; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by
law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.
That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.3
acres and 97 acres, as described herein, and located south of Whistler Drive and Creek
Circle and east of Apple Grove Lane (Tax Map Numbers 95.03-2-19, 19.1, and 33) in
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of
AG3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District and AR, Agriculture/Residential District, to the
zoning classification of PRD, Planned Residential District.
2.
That this action is taken upon the application of Sam L. and Mercedes P.
Hardy.
'"
T-3
3.
That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
hereby accepts:
Minimum of 18' paved width with 2' shoulders for private road.
(1 )
(2)
Maximum 16% grade for private road.
(3)
Development must be developed in substantial conformity with the
concept plan dated, 4/21/2004.
4.
That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
1.237 acres being a portion of Tax Map No. 95.03-2-33 - AG3 to PRD
Tract A containing 45.277 acres and being Tax Map No. 95.03-2-33 - AR to PRD
Tract B containing 26.877 acres and being Tax Map No. 95.03-2-19 - AR to PRD
Tract C containing 25.389 acres and being Tax Map No. 95.03-2-19.1 - AR to
PRD
5.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
'"
NOID
I. _PlA,~_IIIfA""""'"
RW> -.
:r. "".""',---
mcft1lmrorA-OIlE
-r.
~ $1JI!JCÇT I'IItJI'VfFY A' """'" 0f1fJ
NO' ",,-. """'" III( .OOB ~ A
H.O.'" I/UICII'OIIlØ n- ...-
ZOflC trIlS 0(IlIIII""""" /J lIMED
OH III!" nooo - - """ ....
IIOrBWfl'VlRllør-fJEU1
....,."""
~ "'" NI"""""'" '" I'IL""""-
or-.,or_~f1F-.
O. "",..-.r /J - - " Nt
~
~~
¡~
I!
::I
,
J-rl(jY- WdiO/.3t.g
'r
p1IOf'£1frr or
IUZI _AOW ,,"'"
-l~':l:år'J'tí.HII
"""""""""""",,,/ION
"... . 0. I ".OJ-l-2O
.. III( a_os omŒ" "'" III( CIIICVI' """", ~ ~ """"'"'
......... --""__IH[_"""'I£~_-
lSIGfIIÆII' - M1IIQ [p """'..... IV - A' /8: ¥30"CI.QÇK
IIIf .....lit 1M' or van . zo.Ji:/-.
STEVEN A. MCGRAW. cte'" ~~ ~
."..
PIIO_FY QF
mnrrsrttf n_r -
-l~'::'~"'-'tíJ"
I'fOIIII'OOOCI7IIt'I7IM"""
... . ... I ,..I1J-I-II1.'
'r
_FY or
.- _If .......0
oaø.~';¡~~.JI11f
""""""""""""""-
r... l o. I fI.I1J-I-1.ØJ.
'<1"
-"" or
¡mmr I. II&V>I: /If,
- /'. 1IVJJIf
ømr - ,n, 1'oIG£ ",
.0... '.I,m"",,"'"
-'-"""
1M . 0. I "'I1J-I-I'
.. .0'0""""""""""""""""""""'"
....- Al' m>tO. /IIONfS-or-"'" - I'lL
........."..Ms. ,~'""",,>JI1(or"lL
"""""" uvu.
~
JlIJ" - 1M1Dmmnr
øcnotf '. UJ'" , - to
PIA"- '.. ...... J'
-.,.or
DWfr If. .fIIIÇt3
..... .OOK "... ...... rm
- .. ..... """" .... ~ IJ'
.... ø. I "'OJ-I-"
( \
\
\
,
\ /""" - ..- .....
""...."FY..... - ~ 1IttØ'ID'- - --
.,.
"""""" Ute (.1UMtUI} _rr ~
I'IU.Wl If. nmr
- AS ouaøøm . DD.Dmr II. nmr
Drn1 IIOIIIC '.'. ~ 50'
... l ø. I "'aJ-Z-ZJ
.It"
_OF
IWfrrtr r. /.Hf/C
1<f/f1rtmð r. UlrIC
om> /1QO1( "'30 ....... JJ,
... l ... I "'I1J-t-"
'C-
_rr or
II"," If. GrAMS'
/JW} BOOK "", ....r ..'
... . ø. I "'DJ-O-JD
'If'
""""..... or
n.rm. .w.rr """"""'" IITC.
""" .r,,'" IJOJ, ....... ,"'.
strPlA'- ,.........-
... . ... I "'I1J-,-J/
'..'
-.,.or
D"""'" It. /III"""
I'AØlA r. IWIIA"
oø,"...'l""'ø. i'~...:.'1-'::"
'go
',.
'If'
_rr "
II1WAN If. nmr
ÞD/ff1rRT"111t"IC
"'~ '/.T /r:;.::..::ø
j!---
:;0..- .. e"õ1~
3'\~.""'--
. \ {;'í~ .. '--
.~""""'.....- W"-M!-
w,,- if ~
\"'" .~ _....m
ll" D."""" ~."
",." .. .
,," _rr
\'-':" ,",',,'" ""18 ..~' ~P'~"'~EØ
I. \. ..... ..- \ PIA' I1OCIf ,.. __18'
S ,,""13'. -- ..... ø. , ,..~cr.,
--~ - \ -. ~-.
..g-~-=.""""""'" \ --,-,
SΠ3";::" ...cr ,>6 \
TAX lD. I .:.::::~" \
c
¡'C ;;;,~: ::..:~" - .
I --
c- ¡----c-------
--.....
rrÆl'VII1IM:,u--" .J/H rr<r11lŒ....AM1<tII<Jenr-
Iff nCCOl'lf1N'C!" ..,. JHIi DUrIIEJ " JH£ ..........- """'" - ..
COMPl....,.. "',. stI:I!Orf 15.'-11" """' 'u-"" OF ..... "'" .-
or ........ AS -- "' IMII;
"'~.. JH£ ",tI.- SÐOU AMI ,.",..nmu "" - -d.1... Ø4'. OF
",,"""""OF
moNAI U"""'"
"""D~ - ...""'..,.
..... /lOOK .- "'""'OJ
"""<no-"
.... . ø. I ""~-Z-J'
I'I.)IT 80'
. "Acr -------
! -
I-
::fW\unr ~ ' ""'.
~.><7--- D -1'~. ø
~
, fÁ<¡"
"""""" ,.. ........
PLAT S/lCIII'INC IHr
COIoIBlNAnQN AN() RC;UBDMSIQN or TN! PARCas
195.03-Z-33. 195.03-Z- 19. 195.OJ-4-3
SAM L. HARDY. JR. /](
MERCEDES P. HARDY
97,543 ACRES ( TOTAL) LOCATED ON
VA. SEC. RTE. 698
WINDSOR HILLS MAGfSTERIAL DISTIDcr
ROANOKE COUNTY. YIRGINIA
SCALE: l' - 300' DATE: 11-6-2003
DAVID B. SCOTT L.S. 1931
HlLLSYfUE, YIRGfNfA
II/( '0' II¡1V . ......" . . IS M/VAIF AND "., """-
IV<4I\tt "'I. /J NO' A I'VI1UC øEJPOIt-. IT
JH'tL NO' ..,.. """ ..... ."'IF ~
.IJ"" "'" JIICII lIME" AS IT /J CONSrrwcmJ AND
o~ ~OFJH£--"'-
II/JfT or """.!t'I1/I"'11ØY "'" .- .man-
"""""" ., JH( "'" " $1ICH w.m- """""'" '" C4I1SC
... .mrrr '" 9[CO!I! ElICIlIlC IV III( srAff mJ(Jl
StlAlL 11£ PIIOMI1W """ f1J/tDJ IHOSC A"""'rvrrv '" JH(
---ror_"""'"
-
,..
J"" .".
, .
'¡QB NQ. 7669
t \"..-. 0 'P.lnnl<.n,l...'n . """'"r I'III/l'" (It AND"",
...~ DO"""" œl""" "..,
So", L. HQr~'. '\ muud." P .I-IClrdu
__IS "' mrr~"""'" ""HrÞm..........r
-_",,_~JH£$UI£ON""
~~zJ, .'oo.
Mr ,-- ..- ~
AmI" /lEWfENCtJ 'NO NO'A"""',
..-sm.:r~l=' ~f.;....r i~¡;'JI
.... 'D.# ".DJ-'-», ".OJ-Z-". .... '.D.I ".DJ-'-J
1OnI3"" Il-(6-Z00J. '-'-lD.'
-, HERf.O(' Br "'" /f<TANO«£ COIJ1(1I" JUIIVMS"," ...".. /J "'"
PU("'O'" """""""" """"WlCr orPH III( Rrw«RCC cournr .""-
O't""'" ",.",..,..,... """"'~ ...,.,.,., $1ICH AS """",-14HCC or"
R"- ~ or< OJHlilf nIlE ..............,. """-",,mc "'
me ,.,.",."rc """"" HE""",, - - """"'" ..., '""""'""
or,. - IV rIIIO ".",.""". IIIf 8£-""""""'"
--
-,~~~~ -_om
SDuna: "" mc:
"""" 'll 0' rr<r swr M"""'FY c;vIM1t1I "' SAM I. _or'NII
I<ÐIŒIÆ' ... ......, ""'" 1nJOO$ OIIP LA"" .. "'111m. LLC.. Br
~.s;.m2:;'~7¡,,}""J~ ~W.:='r~f~
- cou:m; ""-
(-1.1,.,
...."
~
. - - - --..
-¡I
Lu
no
f) a. rr7
{)¡;.1:("
I
\."..3
'I'!>"'~ !-,....e. 'E~
1
i
OUTPA\2CE.L. @
t I~ At:..
...
.~,
'"
".'~u>a.\~i"'5 tr..t"
e
('
. OOrpÅlZ.Ce:L (%)
, : :!.: 1.7 .&-c..
I (\..OT?
, 1 t-'\1c,T-r I"Ol!e"T)
. .
~
l-EG1E..N D
~_..::& Of'E1-t sr~C!:.
--......-- '2.C;; C~I{TOt.>I:t<;:,
þo D~l~~ ~~"('!t
W,,",I..KI\.tG¡ ~"'\l..S
r~Ot"E.It."r'1' 1.o1~e.'!:Þ
r~!>\..e. \o4Ou~& ....n..~
./
-' OUrp~E!...<D
~Q.r.."".
~
æ
I %.1:>0.' J
~-"'\C su..s....
MEr¿CEDE~
120AI-lO¡.tE. COl}¡..¡T't'"
SCÅ\...e: \". ZOO'
I
ø'
/
-1-<
......)
'2. t\ ~ïO¡..t I NOU~ PA.\l5M,SUf «ð .(?)
a- e&..~ (2\ a~ 2.( A.)
MlN.
~.
'7hdi.er
\'ïFf ..,..
\J¡ oJ I
~'
5~lIQ
\À\tJ. I'Z I'
\I l)'~~~. .
Ott-~
DAN CHITWOOD
CEmIFIB> IJI\NDSCAI't! .o.ncHI1õCT
f\ p.o. b21W12
I '" RøInoke, VirI:InIa 24D11
"'- vø.9!Í40
Home ~ VBJ.6œ
TY?lCAL Q/)þ\D.'~€GTtON
~eQCEœ<; t4B\~~T~
SCALE: \J.o~i DATE:
DRWN BY:
SHEET NO.: OF: