HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/24/2004 - Regular
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
August 24, 2004
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for August 24, 2004. Regular meetings
are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings
are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3,
and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturdays at 4:00 p.m. The
meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special
arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact
the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance.
A.
OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
Reverend Brent Williams
Colonial Presbyterian Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C.
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation declaring August 27,2004 as the fifth annual Hokie Pride Day in
Roanoke County
D.
BRIEFINGS
E.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to approve resolution authorizing the execution of an agreement
between Roanoke County and Roanoke City relocating portions of the
boundary line between said governmental entities, and authorizing that
certain other actions relating to such boundary line be taken as provided by
law. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney)
1
2. Request to appropriate funds from the state for the 2003-2004 fiscal year to
the following departments: (Brent Robertson, Director of Management and
Budget)
(a) Request to appropriate $115,000 from the state for fiscal year 2003-2004
for Public Assistance Programs in the Department of Social Services
(b) Request to accept and appropriate additional state revenues in the
amount of $98,000 to the Sheriff's Office for fiscal year 2003-2004 budget
(c) Request to appropriate $24,810 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the
state for fiscal year 2003-2004
F.
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING
ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not
indicate support for, or judge the merits o~ the requested zoning actions but
satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will
be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.
G.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
H.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
I.
APPOINTMENTS
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by
District)
2. Grievance Panel
3. Industrial Development Authority
4. Library Board (Appointed by District)
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
6. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community
Advisory Committee (CAC)
J.
CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
2
1. Approval of minutes - July 27, 2004
2. Confirmation of committee appointments to Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by District), Grievance Panel, Industrial
Development Authority, and Social Services Advisory Board (Appointed by
District)
3. Resolutions of appreciation upon the retirement of the following individuals:
(a) Ellen A. Hylton, Library, following twenty-eight years of service
(b) Lois J. Spigle, Library, after twenty-five years of service
4. Request to accept Farmhouse Lane and Farmhouse Court into the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System, Hollins Magisterial
District
5. Request from the Library to accept and appropriate literacy grant funds in the
amount of $1 ,250
6. Request from schools to appropriate a drug free communities renewal grant
in the amount of $99,999
7. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $5,120 for the
capital improvement incentive grant for playground safety
8. Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of $75,000 from the
Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation
9. Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of $23,387 from the
Governor's Office of Substance Abuse Prevention
10. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate
grant funds in the amount of $2,743 from the Virginia Department of Health
for the purchase of mass casualty triage equipment
11. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate
grant funds in the amount of $12,997 from the Virginia Department of Health
for the purchase of cardiac monitors
K.
REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.
M.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
3
N.
REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Future Capital Projects
5. Accounts Paid - July 2004
6. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month
ended July 31,2004
O.
7. Statement of Treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy as
of July 31,2004
CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (30)
discussion of the terms or scope of a public contract where discussion in open
session would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of
the County, namely the contract and selection of a vendor for the new public
safety center.
P.
WORK SESSIONS (4th Floor Conference Room)
1. Work session to discuss proposed amendment to Chapter 19, Solicitors and
Solicitations, of the Roanoke County Code, to allow for solicitations in public
roads. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator)
EVENING SESSION
Q.
CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
R.
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
S.
1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 4.83 acres from 11C Industrial
District with conditions to R1 Low Density Residential District for a
development of single family housing located at Tract B 1-A-2 of Mason
Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Balzer &
Associates, Inc. Withdrawn at the reQuest of the petitioner
2. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a
major utility service (stormwater management pond) located at 2820 Byron
4
Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Pinkerton Properties,
LLC. Withdrawn at the reQuest of the petitioner
3. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 7.83 acres from R1 Low Density
Residential District and C2C General Commercial District with conditions to
R3 Medium Density Multi Family District in order to construct townhouses
located at the northerly end of Byron Road, Catawba Magisterial District,
upon the petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC. Continued until September
28. 2004 at the reQuest of the petitioner
4. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a
car wash located at 7443 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon
the petition of Double D Mini-Mart, Inc. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
5. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to conduct
recreational vehicle sales located at 6718 Williamson Road, Hollins
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Douglas Kidd, Inc., Va
Brookside Auto Sales. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
6. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a
telecommunications facility located at 7401 Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Virginia PCS Alliance, LC, d/b/a/ NTELOS.
(Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
7. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to develop and
operate a golf course on 362 acres and to rezone 115 acres from AG-3
Agricultural to AR Agricultural Residential with conditions located at 3687
Pitzer Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of George Golf
Design, Inc. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
8. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 4.514 acres from 12 Industrial
District to R1 Low Density Residential District in order to construct single-
family dwellings located at 5132 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald. (Janet Scheid,
Chief Planner)
9. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a
commercial indoor amusement facility located at 5728 Williamson Road,
Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Star City Comics and Games.
(Janet Scheid, Chief Planner)
T.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
5
U.
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Michael W. Altizer
2. Joseph P. McNamara
3. Joseph B. "Butch" Church
4. Michael A. Wray
5. Richard C. Flora
V.
ADJOURNMENT TO TUESDAY, AUGUST 31 AT 5:00 P.M. FOR THE
PURPOSE OF A WORK SESSION WITH DR. MIKE CHANDLER TO DISCUSS
THE COMMUNITY PLAN, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
5204 BERNARD DRIVE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, 4TH FLOOR TRAINING ROOM
6
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
e-\
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Proclamation declaring August 27, 2004 as the fifth annual
Hokie Pride Day in Roanoke County
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recommend approval
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke Valley Hokie Club and the Roanoke Valley Virginia Tech Alumni Association
have requested that the County issue a proclamation declaring Friday, August 27,2004, as
the fifth annual Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day. Pat Green and Brian Wilson will be present
to accept the proclamation.
c-/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2004
PROCLAMATION DECLARING AUGUST 27,2004 AS THE
FIFTH ANNUAL HOKIE PRIDE DAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley has had a long and mutually beneficial relationship
with Virginia Tech, its alumni, and supporters, and is home to many thousands of Virginia
Tech alumni and friends of the University; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Tech has brought great positive attention to Southwest Virginia
in academics, research and athletics; and the supporters of Virginia Tech feel great pride in
the accomplishments of the University; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Tech Hokie Club and the Virginia Tech Alumni Association,
which extends membership to any and all supporters of Virginia Tech, are promoting
Friday, August 27,2004, as the fifth annual Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day; and
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke wishes to recognize the positive impact of
Virginia Tech on its community and to encourage all supporters of Virginia Tech, both
individuals and businesses, to demonstrate their Hokie pride.
NOW THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do
hereby proclaim Friday, August 27, 2004, as the fifth annual HOKIE PRIDE DAY in the
County of Roanoke, and call its significance to the attention of all of our citizens; and
FURTHER, we extend our best wishes to Virginia Tech, its alumni, friends and
supporters for continued success in future endeavors.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
I:: -I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to approve resolution authorizing the execution of
an agreement between Roanoke County and Roanoke City
relocating portions of the boundary line between said
governmental entities, and authorizing that certain other
actions relating to such boundary line be taken as provided
bylaw
SUBMITTED BY:
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recommend approval
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This resolution authorizes the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to execute, on
behalf of the County, an agreement to relocate portions of the boundary line between
Roanoke County and Roanoke City.
The County Attorney's office has reviewed the boundary line adjustment agreement and
the petition to relocate the boundary line between Roanoke County and Roanoke City
for submission to the Circuit Court. A plat has been prepared by Lumsden Associates
dated June 2, 2004, and the required public notices have been prepared.
The procedure followed is established in Article 2, Chapter 31, Title 15.2 of the 1950
Code of Virginia, as amended.
The corporate boundary lines between Roanoke County and Roanoke City will be
adjusted as follows:
1. A parcel of real estate owned by Roanoke County and containing 53.038 acres
being located along Berkley Road and known as Vinyard Park II (Tax Map
#7020101) and currently located in Roanoke City will be included within the
corporate boundary of Roanoke County. (See Exhibit A for map.)
Ë-I
2. Parcels of real estate owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority containing
33.094 acres (Tax Map No. 70.11-1-1); AP.J., LLC containing 5.131 acres (Tax Map
No. 70.11-1-3), and James R. Chisom containing 0.753 acres (Tax Map No. 70.11-
1-19.1) being located along Underhill Avenue and currently located in Roanoke
County will be included within the corporate boundary of Roanoke City. (See Exhibit
B for map.)
3. A parcel of real estate owned by Rockydale Quarries Corporation and containing
9.024 acres (Tax Map No. 88.03-1-36) being located at the intersection of Draper
Road and Old Rocky Mount Road currently located in Roanoke County will be
included within the corporate boundary of Roanoke City. (See Exhibit C for map.)
Plats showing the proposed boundary line adjustments are incorporated by reference
into the resolution of the Board of Supervisors and will be filed with the petition to
relocate with the Circuit Court. The plats are attached to this report as Exhibits A, B,
and C.
The Zoning Administrator has reviewed this proposed boundary line adjustment and
based upon surrounding land uses, topography, access options, and current use of
these parcels, he supports the transfers as proposed. Further, he recommends that the
Vinyard park parcel of land to be transferred to Roanoke County should be place in the
zoning classification of R-2.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There would be minimal impact upon total assessments and revenues as a result of this
action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the proposed
resolution.
It is further recommended that if the Board adopts this resolution, that this matter will be
referred to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its recommendation with
respect to classifying this property as R-2.
E-I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,2004
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ROANOKE COUNTY AND ROANOKE CITY RELOCATING
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDA Y LINE BETWEEN SAID
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THAT CERTAIN
OTHER ACTIONS RELATING TO SUCH BOUNDARY LINE BE TAKEN
AS PROVIDED BY LAW
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 31, Title 15.2 of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the governing bodies of Roanoke County and
Roanoke City wish to petition the Circuit Court for approval to relocate portions of the
boundary line between the two jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the relocation the boundary line of such governmental entities in the
areas proposed will permit more effective and efficient delivery of municipal services
and promote the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the governing body of Roanoke City has adopted a measure
reflecting its desire to relocate and change portions of the boundary line between the
two localities as required by certain property owners within said areas; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke City and Roanoke County have agreed to the boundary
relocations by action of their respective governing bodies.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that:
1.
The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute
an agreement between Roanoke City and Roanoke County, on a form approved by the
County Attorney, establishing a new boundary line at certain points between said
E-J
jurisdictions, as more particularly shown on plats prepared by Lumsden Associates,
dated June 2, 2004, which are incorporated by reference herein (Exhibits A, B, and C).
2.
The boundary line set forth in said agreement is described as set out in
the Notice of Public Hearing (Exhibit D) which was published as required by §15.2-3107
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
3.
Upon approval of the execution of the agreement between the governing
bodies, the County Attorney is authorized to petition the Circuit Court of one of the
affected jurisdictions to relocate the boundary line in accordance with the plats and the
agreement.
4.
Upon entry of an order by the Circuit Court establishing the new boundary
line, certified copy of such order will be forwarded to the Secretary of the
Commonwealth.
5.
The County Administrator and County Attorney are authorized to take, or
cause to be taken, such other actions, and to execute other documents as may be
required by law to effect the change in the boundary line as set forth herein.
6.
The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to forward an attested
copy of this resolution to the Roanoke City Clerk.
I
Q)
INSTRUMENT #
.0(
:to
..Q
:E
)(
w
¿"
ÆJ~~
-,t
.'
CITY OF ROANOKE
'" '"""'"
......'" '"
~ .. 0_1.
aAM/E1< --
..a_I'!;.""
'~"
"""
Q
è1
It:
). ~ ROANOKE
~ ~ COUNTY
=
!tU ~""'"""
iii /- """""A'" lINE
----
1
, I
'-....../
-----~--\.
NORFOLK -SOUTHERII RAIL'" A Y
I"D'I,I'MJ
CITY OF ROANOKE
.-
r... 'FAIE ~
---
<aI, """"" W1IHC
, == :=~=
, JBJ2"""- """""."
. JBJ2"'."'"' ,-'°,""
, ........""", "O""""""
. ............... '.........<IIro
, ""'"...."", ""..........",
. ,.,".._'" ,..,'.......
. ""'"",,'" """,..0-
.. JIJDIIII"" """'.."',,
" ""IT"""'" """""5."IT
12 JOJIm,,"" "."""',,'"
JJ ""',.....".. ,.."""""""
" ,.",...os." II.""""".
" JBJ2JZJ.JOWI ""'A""'"
.. JOJ2SOZJO'O1 ".""".m..
" ~J2ZJI '10""'.""'"
10"" .... . ...... """
PtA T SHOIMNG
(.5J.(].]8 ".) BEING mANSm?REV
FROIoI
THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
TO
ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA
BEING A CORPORATE f/OUNVARr LINE AV.AJSßlENT SURlIEr
ALONG THE PERIMETER OF
BOARD OF SUPER\/ISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, \/IRGINIA
S/TUATEV ALONG BERKLEY ROAV
CITY OF ROANOKE, \/IRGINIA
---- """'_A""IME
......... """"',.... !ME
- - """"/OlI'"
,,"
~
r'
NØfÐI:
- - - - _-""OCA""'"
"".... ""'" PI.MI
, K""""'IIeSPlA'a"'~ȣ"."'."""IHE_'C"""'_""""'A1""'"
, 1IeS....'IS....."..A"""""'"",,.......,..
J ""....' IllS - "_I. "" ","," '" , """"" ... _I. ... ENCUØ7ANCES OAr ""I.
"""""'IH/!""""'""""""".."",,..r_-
. ___""ArAu._IJO......_'"""
, """"""""'_""""OCIO'NO'rAu.II"""""""""""""-""""""'1f!)
or""" ... _IS"""'" IN......,- '" ȣ 11.011> """'NiCE IA", -.... HAS NO' "'"
...... or AC"" ..." EID\O"'" m .,....."" p,on "..""""", 0, - ,,""aJOZO 0. <DMN'"
P.wn "'O".""" 0 'AP "",,"""'" ... -'" P'IOl """"'" 0 - "II"""" 0 "If!)
0C1QEJ1 " ...,
. ...... '"""""" D.a ",. PÇ. IIJJ
P,B,
-'",
:;:to
;~j
i~!
~ <'
;¿
:.,
~
~
,.¡ ~
~ ~
< <
z ;¡
§~~
~ ~~.
~ao
~"z
"aÇj
~o:~
'rJ>
Uc::
'w
o...z
-z
ifl<
~~
:::¡Q
UO""
0[;;-
ifJ>",
iflc::¡;;
<::0""
rJ>-
ZcJo>
¡""¡c::¡.,¡
Q~5
r.nzz
;¿ ë3..o:
:::>ZO
...Jwo::
i I~
~IH
PG,
-
lÙ
CD
:to
..c
:E
)(
w
-!IF MTA
TAX. 77.-
caf. BEA- !>Sr-
'-Z . ".,.,,' t ,_,,'
,-, '0"""" t 8J.A'
3-4 ,.,.,'..,' t _...'
A-.> , ....'..,' t "",'
'-4 "",'",', "..".
,-r ,.,,"',.. _.o'
,... . ""...... 171."-
0-' ",..,.".. .......
'-HI . ..~"'-. 51...'
Hl-II . ....."". ""..,'
'HZ ".,...".. ,....,'
12-" ,....,"" t uo...,'
13-1' S ..~,.",", 1261f
lA-" S "..,.,,". Z»M'
IS-" . "","'. "',....
10-17 ""..,.-. ,....'
IT-IO .n~. ...,,'
... . ..,,-,;r. 10'" Qt
..... S...,..... ,......
zo..l/ ,.....-,.". ,~'"
lI-n . """'" . .....
12-2J . """.,-. ......
"-,, . "","". ...HI'
"-III . ""...,-. .,.n'
lII-ZO . Oil""'. ,...,.
28-11 . ""12'. ......
21-ZO . "'.)1""'. ...,..
2/1-" ......,'..'. ......
.." ...V>1'. "".
»-.JI """U". .,,'
"-n '2<"""'. ..",'
.Jl-.JJ . .....'..,'. ....
, .J-.JA .-'..,'. ,-
"-.JO ",-,,'A". .......
""-" ",,""". D.'" '"
,,-, . 5S'lJ'..-. ,..,,'
..r...- ....'"~
'1-30 "lV'U. '50""
""-.. .....,U". "",'
, -'" . ..,,'..,". OJ.'"
...." . ....>S', .,..'
AI-" . "","'. ",..'
"-A.J . """,', J:"';'
"'-3' ./D"II1""", ..rAl. Nl£A . '-'0' -.
"-"1£ ..- lDICIH
" , ,.
Cl ""AI' ,
OJ
Çf "U,. 1
_MTA
FAX. n',-
OOIl. ...- .',,-
.>NOA . ""~Z' , "'...
~...... ."...,"", """.'
.JD -,JJC . "...'". , ",...'
-JO ,......,.. £ ,.....'
""-JOE . 51""'" , .....'
JCIfi-JIF ""'3If"-' ""'OI'
JIF-JOI; '51"""". ""...
........... ,"".,...., ;US'"
JDH-JOJ ,..."..'. z.JS.",,'
.JØ>-ZZ . """"- . ".If'
ZZ-J, . 8l""'-. ....'
Z""2< . .."',... """,'
"->3 . ......,- . 8'.'"
n-,. . "'21'19" . ,...,
"-.2' . A75I'U' . .....'
21-211 . "",,""". ".'0'
llI-a . ..........' . ....-
a-" ...V>1'. AI.'"
""........-,...,-.
---- """""".""""'IME
.......... .,.,."" "'" IME
-
£X 'P.
- - """"/'1"'"
,.............
tOCA TIOIIIlAP
..r .. .....
,.. nAg ,...
--..
"""....- ""JIII<
; ~~:: \\:==1
: =.:'. :::~=I
, "ll."""" ,-,.,-1
~ == :==1
8 ,,--, 'HI""""'O1,
I JiDlIUl1lfJt """""""":
" .....w...... II.'...""""':
" ..............' II."""""'"
,,-,""',..-,,'"
" JOlZl4'l1H' ,""""'".-
" JIll"""'" """.",.",
to JWOIJ""" ""'1I.1.1æ»
.. JIll""Z"" 'ID"""'"
IT """""...oo """""'"
" "'- "Z" '10""'.-
" JIl"".""" ".--
.. """'..)1'" ""'AI" ..."
" ",'..",œ.. '10""""""
II ""....."" '10"""""
lJ """""_A ".,_...",
" """"."'M II.,m'.'om
.. "2l/"."'" '1O""".II2, .J
'" JOmOA.2>OJS 'IOmAl."""
" """""""" 'ID"""""
:ill "lZ.J!I2.'- II."""""
a",,"'..'" '10_"""
,. JW"U"" 'ID""""""'"
" ........."""', """""1."'"
.Jl JO22ZlJ.""" """..,...",
, .J JImlI."'" """"""'"
" JOmJlMZ1' ,,"".........
... -..... 11.'»0'."""
~ == ::::=:
..",.........."""""
3' "'"",.,AI, ","""'-
"" """""" """"""'"
, ....,........ 'TO'AI',.."""
... ""'O1~'- ".".,,""'"
AI ""'....'.... ".""..,...
" ....,......... 'IO,AI",_'
" ""...."", .J "'~S2"':
" "".....".. """""'-I
",r", AI£A . 0"'--
,. "'"""Tcr........rlSlI1"""/HE""""""cr1>£PO£JÐIr",.,cr
_""""""IOHUII£.
, ... Pl.AT IS ..... .. A a.-.r '"'" ....In
~ .... IUT.""""'" .lIWr 11£ If"'" cr A QMÐr ""'.....r-
~"""."EI\ST""rum;r ..,.......,rlWŒ(llrf ...rA"'..r-
-..
,. ",__$Cr"",,- """"..........."".
, A PTJII'<JI IT ... IWŒ(IIIY"- ....,.. .... TAlL .- 1.0//1'5 IT A ,.. ..'"
"""""""""""""""""""'A __IS""""""'"""""",
/HE """" """'AHŒ ..u, MAPS A"" ..... "'IIŒH - B' ACnIA' REID
"co.""". ... """"""rf P- ""........ 0 ""P ",,"'œD<Ø .. ..."" ."'-
,.
l1I1
,. IL"" ~ likE co. ... "'" '" ", A"'" ... ro. oa "'" '" 'J< (11£
J '__",.....r,,"'." 1>£' "'"' "'ACT""""" """"'IS"
...... """"",¡
PLAT $HOIMNC
(Ja.978 AC.) 8E1NG 1RANSF[RR[O
FROM
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TO
THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
BEING A CORPORATE BOUNOARY LINE AD.AJSTIIENT SURVEY
ALONG THE: PER!IIE:TER OF
IIIE CITY OF ROANOKE PROPERT~
A.P,J., LLC PROP[RTY AND
JAI/E$ R. CHI$()/of PROPERTY
91\JATEO ALONG UNDERHILL AVENUE
F/OAN()/(E COUNT~ "'RGINIA
ceo>
; ;j;p,
~~::,
~.:::~
~~~
""'~
~~~,
~ i
.:¡
~
~
~ 5
::: ;;
~ ~
~ L
i ~!-
~¡¡~
¡~~
(jiQ
o..:~
</ÍZ
u.¡<
f-~
<:¡}¡
~o;:
uo
o¡:;;:
ifJ>?,.
ifJœ:(3
<:=>o;:
zJ;>
¡:SEi~
ifJ"'o
;¿G~
:::;Jzo
...J¡..¡œ:
I
PG,
----'~.. -""-
NOTES:
P.B,
,
w
()
-
:is
:E
)(
w
CITY OF ROANOKE
TAX """""
""""""'CJF
,.x",.", - a""o'" I'tI/
/IiO. co.) a. "', "" ...
CITY OF ROANOKE
ROANOKE COUNTY
/"
_TESr
,. """""'CJF"""""'IS"""""""'X"""CJFM:"""""'OTl'CJF""""""",""","""""'.
Z ... ptAT IS ...... ... .. ,...."" TElD ""'T
, """"'S""""" ....., "'" 101m' CJF , ..-., ,.. ,""", - """""'..""" ..., "'"
..., Am'" '"' ......", """"'JY ..., .... NO' ...... ........
, ..... -.... SIT AT AIL aRÆIiS; UIUSS 0""115£ ""....
, ","""""IT_"""""""""AIL._""'t;IF, """"'11.""'-"""'-""
"TEll'. !IllS - IS """" '" ,. JOORrI'tl/ t;IF ..., FlDaJ """"AI'" ".. ""... - ",S NO' lED'
...... IT "'""" TElD flfl"","", sa -". PAIoE!. ..'"...... a""'.."'"""," 0 AI., ",""""JY
PAIti ,,'D'f/IJOfn a "'" """1CtJIJ62 .. .,,'" "'1!J f l " ""
" UCA"""""'" aa ..., "" I/IU
INSTRUMENT #
NO"""""
/"
... nAB ........
---
""" ""'.... CAS'"
1 JIll""""" 1IOMZI'.III..
. ,...", """ "......-
J -,... "......-
. ............... "......""""
J -TDl.œ'2J """"">9"
- -..... ',....J4.DJJIf
, '-","""""""""""
-........-,........"'"
I -.",...... ,...........,
10 ........... ,_.""'"
" -- "....,...,...,
1 _"'OI6S1 """".111"
RI'AI. AR£A - Ii... AO1[S
~
~ ,n >:
~~8
g~
Hi
~~~
~ ~
-
---- """""'catPtRA"""""
PfIDPOSlD".""..""'1JtIC
- - """"'" '/0 ....
EXIS1WG .... "'"
EX lp.
.:.
"
1
à'.
~- ~
~ ~
< <
Z L
§§~
~ ~~.
~;¡¡'ž
:b:jð
~" ..
'(J)
Ucz::
o..:~
UÎ~
ú.J.
f-,
'::::12
u~<
Ow-
(/) >- 7'.
(/)CZ::3
-«:::0""
z~>
~~~
(/)wO
;EG~
=>zo
....Jw""
I
il ~~' !
~ I
¥ ,
~ ~
\Ì 12
~ II ~
PG.
PLA T SHOIMNG
(9.024 AC.) BEING TRANSFERRED
ffiO/ol
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TO
THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
BEING A BOUNDARY LINE AD..JJSTIIENT SURVEY
ALONG THE PERIMETER OF
ROCK'TÐALE OUARRIES CORPORA nON PROPERTY
Sl1VATED AT THE INÆRSECTION
OF DRAPffi ROAD AND OLO ROCKY IlOUNT ROAD
ROANOKE COUNTY, VlRQNIA
P.B.
E-I
Exhibit D
NOTICE OF PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE RELOCATIONS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Pursuant to Sections 15.2-3106, et sea, of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, on Tuesday, August 24, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Roanoke County Administration Center, Board Meeting Room, 5204 Bernard Drive,
Roanoke, Virginia, and the City Council of the City of Roanoke, on Monday, August 16,
2004, at 7:00 p.m. in the Roanoke City Council Chambers, Room 450, Noel C. Taylor
Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue Roanoke, Virginia, will consider adoption of an
agreement authorizing the relocation of portions of the boundary line between the two
jurisdictions.
The boundary line adjustments are described as follows:
(1) A parcel of real estate owned by Roanoke County and containing 53.038
acres being located along Berkley Road and known as Vinyard Park II (Tax Map #70201 01)
and currently located in Roanoke City will be included within the corporate boundary of
Roanoke County.
(2) Parcels of real estate owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority
containing 33.094 acres (Tax Map No. 70.11-1-1); AP.J., LLC containing 5.131 acres (Tax
Map No. 70.11-1-3), and James R. Chisom containing 0.753 acres (Tax Map No. 70.11-1-
19.1) being located along Underhill Avenue and currently located in Roanoke County will be
included within the corporate boundary of Roanoke City.
(3) A parcel of real estate owned by Rockydale Quarries Corporation and
containing 9.024 acres (Tax Map No. 88.03-1-36) being located at the intersection of
Draper Road and Old Rocky Mount Road currently located in Roanoke County will be
included within the corporate boundary of Roanoke City.
A copy of the proposed agreement between the City and the County and the "Plat
Showing Corporate Boundary Line Adjustment Surveys of Rockydale Quarries Corporation
Draper Road Site (9.024 acres), County of Roanoke Vinyard Park Site (53.038 acres),
Western Virginia Water Authority Sewage Disposal Plant (33.094 acres), AP .J, LLC (5.131
acres), and James R. Chisom (0.753 acres)" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. and
e-l
Exhibit D
dated June 2,2004, can be viewed at the Clerks' Office of the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors located at 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, and at the Clerk's Office of
the Roanoke City Council at 215 Church Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, during normal
business hours.
Mary F. Parker
Roanoke City Clerk
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Of Roanoke County
Please publish on:
August 2, 2004
August 9, 2004
Please send the bill to:
Diane S. Childers, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
ACTION NO.
E-~,Q
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to appropriate $115,000 to the Aid to Dependent
Children program in the Department of Social Services for
fiscal year 2003-2004 budget
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent Robertson
Director of Management and Budget
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Department of Social Services receives additional appropriations throughout the year
for public assistance and services delivery. During FY03-04, the department provided
services for various programs including transitional day care, aid to foster children, and
adoption subsidy that are 100% reimbursable from the federal government. The
Department of Social Services cannot access these funds until the County has
appropriated the departmental budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact - 100% state funds
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends an appropriation to recognize an additional $115,000 of FederallV-E
revenues for FY 2003-2004 and to appropriate $115,000 to the expenditure budget of
Social Services to cover the costs of the related services.
ACTION NO.
E-~.b
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to accept and appropriate additional state revenues in
the amount of $98,000 to the Sheriff's Office for fiscal year
2003-2004 budget
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent Robertson
Director of Management and Budget
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
During FY 2003-2004, as in previous years, the inmate population at the Roanoke County
jail has remained above capacity. In addition, the average daily inmate population
increased from 240 to 259 through FY 2004, an increase of 8% over the prior fiscal year.
The average population for the final quarter for FY 2004 was approximately 268. As a
result, operational costs such as food, utilities, medical costs, etc. continue to consume a
substantial portion of the jail's budget. Due to the increased inmate population, the Sheriff
is projecting expenditures related to inmate care to exceed original budget allocations by
$98,000 for FY 2003-2004. For comparative purposes, the year-end adjustment approved
by the Board for the prior year was $147,000.
Roanoke County is reimbursed by the state for salaries, mileage, office expenses, and for
housing state prisoners. The reimbursement for state responsible inmates varies between
a rate of $6 and $8/day. In addition, the City of Salem reimburses the County for housing
its prisoners on a per diem basis.
State reimbursement for commonwealth responsible prisoners is subject to state prisoner
population, general assembly appropriations, and political factors, variables difficult to
consider in revenue projections.
E --:). b
During previous fiscal years, state revenue receipts have exceeded the conservative state
budget projections by an amount that would cover increased jail expenditures caused by
higher than normal inmate populations. The mid-year reductions employed by the state in
the prior and current fiscal years have greatly reduced these additional funds. Based on
the revenue estimates versus the projected revenues anticipated to be collected from the
state and from the City of Salem for the Sheriff's Department for FY 2003-2004, revenues
in excess of budget for these categories should total approximately $110,000. The FY
2004-2005 expenditure budget for the jail has been adjusted to reflect the increased inmate
population that has steadily grown over the last several years; therefore, if additional
appropriations are needed at the end of the current fiscal year the addition should be
minimal.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact - 100% state funds
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends an appropriation adjustment to recognize an additional $98,000 of
revenue for FY 2003-2004 for personnel and operations reimbursement and increasing the
FY 2003-2004 care and confinement budget within the Sheriffs department by $98,000 to
cover increased operational costs of the jail caused by increased inmate population,
staffing requirements, and capital reimbursements.
ACTION NO.
E-~. c
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to appropriate $24,810 to the Clerk of the Circuit
Court from the state for fiscal year 2003-2004
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent Robertson
Director of Management and Budget
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
During 2003-04, the Clerk of the Circuit Court incurred expenses relating to the purchase of
software, hardware, maintenance, and related upgrades to the indexing software utilized by
the courts. These expenses were reimbursed by the state through technology funds
earmarked for this purpose and now need to be appropriated to the Clerk of Circuit Court.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact-100% state funds
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriating $24,810 to the Clerk of Circuit Court for fiscal year 2003-
2004.
ACTION NO.
I --.ld I)
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by District)
The following one-year terms will expire on August 31, 2004: Barbara Fasnacht,
Catawba Magisterial District; Dawn Erdman, Cave Spring Magisterial District; and the
late Lee B. Eddy, Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Supervisor McNamara has requested that Barbara Bushnell, Windsor Hills Magisterial
District, be added to the consent agenda for confirmation at this meeting.
2. Grievance Panel
The three-year term of R. Vincent Reynolds will expire on September 10, 2004.
Supervisor Flora has requested that Mr. Reynolds' name be added to the consent
agenda for confirmation at this meeting.
3. Industrial Development Authority
The four-year term of Linwood P. Windley will expire on September 26, 2004. Mr.
Windley lives in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Supervisor Flora has requested
that Mr. Windley's name be added to the consent agenda for confirmation at this
meeting.
1
I I-to
4. Library Board (Appointed by District)
Ms. Connie Goodman, who represents the Vinton Magisterial District, has resigned.
Her four-year term will expire December 31, 2004.
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
The following three-year terms expired on June 30, 2004: David A. Thompson, Hollins
Magisterial District, and Bobby G. Semones, Vinton Magisterial District.
6. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Community Advisory
Committee (CAC)
The late Lee B. Eddy served on this committee without a term limit. The County has
three representatives on this Committee and the Board is asked to appoint a citizen
and/or representative of the community, business, education, health care or civic
interests rather than staff members.
2
J\ - \ \
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,2004
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN
CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED
AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 24,
2004, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes - July 27,2004
2. Confirmation of committee appointments to Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Review Committee (Appointed by District) and Social Services Advisory Board
(Appointed by District)
3. Resolutions of appreciation upon the retirement of the following individuals:
(a) Ellen A. Hylton, Library, following twenty-eight years of service
(b) Lois J. Spigle, Library, after twenty-five years of service
4. Request to accept Farmhouse Lane and Farmhouse Court into the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System, Hollins Magisterial
District
5. Request from the Library to accept and appropriate literacy grant funds in the
amount of $1,250
6. Request from schools to appropriate a drug free communities renewal grant in
the amount of $99,999
7. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $5,120 for the
capital improvement incentive grant for playground safety
8. Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of $75,000 from the
Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation
1
.J-\- \ \
9. Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of $23,387 from the
Governor's Office of Substance Abuse Prevention
10. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate grant
funds in the amount of $2,743 from the Virginia Department of Health for the
purchase of mass casualty triage equipment
11. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate grant
funds in the amount of $12,997 from the Virginia Department of Health for the
purchase of cardiac monitors
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
J-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Confirmation of committee appointments to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by
District), Grievance Panel, Industrial Development Authority,
and Social Services Advisory Board (Appointed by District)
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the July 27, 2004 Board meeting, Supervisor Flora nominated Jason Perdue, Hollins
Magisterial District, to serve an additional one-year term that will expire on August 31,
2005.
At the July 27, 2004 Board meeting, Supervisor Altizer nominated Mike Roop, Vinton
Magisterial District, to serve an additional one-year term that will expire on August 31,
2005.
Supervisor McNamara has requested that Barbara Bushnell, Windsor Hills Magisterial
District, be added to the consent agenda for confirmation at this meeting. This term will
expire on August 31, 2005.
1
J-~
Grievance Panel
Supervisor Flora has requested that R. Vincent Reynolds' name be added to the consent
agenda for confirmation at this meeting. His three-year term will expire on September 10,
2007.
Industrial Development Authority
Supervisor Flora has requested that Linwood P. Windley's name be added to the consent
agenda for confirmation at this meeting. His four-year term will expire on September 26,
2004. Mr. Windley lives in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Social Services Adviso
Supervisor McNamara nominated Janet Green to serve an additional four-year term that
will expire on August 1 , 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
S 3lCt... b)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolutions of appreciation upon the retirement of the following
individuals:
(a) Ellen A. Hylton, Library, after twenty-eight years of service
(b) Lois J. Spigle, Library, after twenty-five years of service
SUBMITTED BY:
Brenda J. Holton
Deputy Clerk to the Board
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Ms. Ellen A. Hylton retired on July 1, 2004, after twenty-eight years and ten months of
service, and Ms. Lois J. Spigle retired on August 1,2004, after twenty-five years of service
with theCounty Library. They have requested that their resolutions be mailed since they
are unable to attend a Board meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board approve the attached resolutions and direct the Deputy
Clerk to mail them to the retirees with the appreciation of the Board members for their many
years of service to the County.
-y- S. G.J
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 10, 2004
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF
ELLEN A. HYLTON, LIBRARY, AFTER TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS OF
SERVICE
WHEREAS, Ellen A. Hylton was first employed by Roanoke County on
August 18, 1975, as a librarian; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Hylton was branch librarian at the Vinton Library in 1983
when the building was heavily damaged by a structural failure, yet she and her staff worked
tirelessly to insure that services to the patrons were never interrupted; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Hylton later became head of Technical Services and was
responsible for accurately cataloging more than 23,000 items annually, making new
materials immediately available to the public; and,
WHEREAS, Ms. Hylton led the process to convert the library's catalog from
paper records to an electronic format, which became the basis of the online catalog and
opened up the system's resources to citizens across the valley; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Hylton retired from Roanoke County as a Divisional Librarian
on July 1, 2004, after twenty-eight years and ten months of service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Hylton, through her employment with Roanoke County, has
been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the
~-~.Û-I
citizens of Roanoke County to ELLEN A. HYLTON for more than twenty-eight years of
capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy and productive retirement.
2
3-~,b
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2004
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF
LOIS J. SPIGLE, LIBRARY, AFTER TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Lois J. Spigle was first employed by Roanoke County on August
16, 1979, as a library assistant at the Glenvar Branch Library; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Spigle initiated a popular book club and assisted with other
special programs which helped establish the library as a vital part of its community; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Spigle later transferred to the Headquarters/419 Library
where she became an integral part of the circulation team, providing knowledgeable
guidance on authors and books to thousands of library patrons; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Spigle always exemplified the highest standards of calm,
courteous, reliable, and positive public service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Spigle retired from Roanoke County on August 1,2004, after
twenty-five years of service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Spigle, through her employment with Roanoke County, has
been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the
citizens of Roanoke County to LOIS J. SPIGLE for twenty-five years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
:f-~ . b
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy and productive retirement.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
J-4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to accep Farmhouse Lane and Farmhouse Court into
the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Secondary
System, Hollins Magisterial District.
SUBMITTED BY:
Arnold Covey
Director of Community Development
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
F&W Community Development Corporation, the developer of Orchard Park, Section 3 and
Orchard Park, Section 4, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requesting that they accept 0.10 mile of
Farmhouse Lane from its intersection with Huntridge Road to its cul-de-sac and 0.08 mile
of Farmhouse Court from its intersection with Farmhouse Lane to its cul-de-sac.
Staff has inspected these roads, along with representatives ofVDOT, and finds the roads
are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept
Farmhouse Lane and Farmhouse Court into the Secondary Road System.
3-~
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR
MEETING ON THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2004, ADOPTED THE FOllOWING:
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FARMHOUSE lANE AND
FARMHOUSE COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM.
WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Addition Form SR-5(A), fully
incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation,
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered
into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies
to this request for addition,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form
SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements. and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-
of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Recorded Vote
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Yeas:
Nays:
A Copy Teste:
Diane S. Childers, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
pc:
Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development
Virginia Department of Transportation
File
Form SR-S(^)' (2/1/93)
.l1ffi?
ADDITIONS FOAM SA-5eA) - Proposed Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways
AtI4chment to (check one only) IX! Board 01 SUpervilorl Aeeoluöon 0 Surety Instrumenl Daled: ~jSJi.J. Attachment
-L 01 ...1.-
'~COHDMlY ROADS DIY,
.Name of SubdivisIon: ORCHARD PARK. SECTION 3 & 4
ROANOKE'
County
Ael. NlII11e 01 Street Street Addition Termini R-O- W Mlscellan8QtlJ Notes AddiUon Length
No. WIdth (II) Centerline MillS
From: I 11\1 Y.7T'Tl-I" I-IIIN"~ 11(;1<' "ROboT)
t FARMHOUSE lANE To: ITS CUL-DE-SAC 40 0.10
Plat Recorded Date: 8/2/99 ~Book: 22 Page: 63
Fran:
To:
Plat Aecorded Dale: 10/16/00 ~Book: 23 Page: 165
From: INTERSECTION WITH FARMHOUSE lANE
2 FARMHOUSE COURT To: 1'1's r.m-nF.-SAr. 40 0.08
Plat Aecorded Dale: 10/16/00~uuBook: 23 Page: 165
Fran:
~ To:
Pial Aecorded Dale: Deed Book: Page:
Fran:
5 To:
Plat Recorded Dale: Deed Book: Page:
Fran:
6 To:
Pial Aecorded Dale: Deed Book: Paoe:
Fran: .
7 To:
Pial Aecorded Dale: Deed Book:. Page:
Noles: Gulltanleed width 01 righl of way exclusive 01 any necessary easements lor cuts. fills, and dreJnage. To"'" Mileage ()1A
CEATIFICATION OF ATTACHMENT
this el\echmenlls certified lIS a perl 01 (he documeollndlcaled above:
L--\
~
t
~
~-~
NORTH
'. '.v,'
">~.
~.
. ;.~
------- / . .
~ ß---- //:
-<. 'ZI' _w, .-
~ '
'"
\
- ~
,. ,
/
/'
\.
<òl
~..
r,;.V
-~
.l
.'~
. r7" \.
.pi 'rJ:> 'i
/ ":~
........
Orchard Park, Section 3
-"""'" . - ----
-, " I
-Àì Ji
.rí".~~!ì :--;.
/
. .
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY
DESCRIPTION
LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY ROADWAY WIDTH SERVICES
Miles Feet Feet Houses
0.1 40 28 8
Farmhouse Lane from the intersection with Huntridge Road
to its cul-de-sac.
Farmhouse Court from the intersection with Farmhouse
Lane to its cul-de-sac.
0.08
40
28
8
ROANOKE COURTY .
DEP.Þ..RTMENT OF
C 01£MFlNITY. DE.VE.LOp'MENT
. , .
ACCEPTANCE OF FARMHOUSE LANE
AND FARMHOUSE COURT INTO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORT AnON SECONDARY SYSTEM. .
ACTION NO.
:r-~
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from the Library to accept and appropriate literacy
grant funds in the amount of $1 ,250
SUBMITTED BY:
Diana L. Rosapepe
Director of Library Services
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County Public Library applied to the Wal-MartlSAM'S CLUB Foundation for a
community literacy grant from the Foundation's new program, "Help a Friend on the Road
to Reading." With the support of Wal-Mart Store #1301 (Franklin Road), the Library was
awarded $1 ,250 for the Summer Reading Program, which encourages children from across
the valley to maintain or improve their reading skills. If accepted and appropriated, the
funds will be used to purchase supplies and provide special children's programs and
services throughout the system.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funds would be needed.
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $1 ,250.
ACTION NO.
T~{P
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from schools to appropriate a drug free communities
renewal grant in the amount of $99,999
SUBMITTED BY:
JoAnn Burkholder
Student Assistance Program Administrator, Safe and Drug-
Free Schools Coordinator, Roanoke County Prevention Council
Project Director
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In March 2004, the Roanoke County Community/School Prevention Council applied for the
drug-free communities renewal grant from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention. This grant application embraces the March 2003 resolution adopted by the
School Board and Board of Supervisors supporting the Council's efforts to foster the
healthy development of the youth in Roanoke County through prevention and intervention
efforts of high risk behaviors. The Council works to enhance collaborative efforts among
students, parents, community agencies, law enforcement and schools based on a data
driven strategic plan.
On July 13, 2004, the schools were notified that the renewal grant was accepted for the full
award of $99,999. The funds will support the efforts of the Roanoke County Prevention
Council from October 1,2004 to September 30,2005. The grant can be renewed for five
years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Roanoke County serves as the fiscal agent for the grant at a reimbursement of 5% ($5,000)
of the grant funds.
:r-~
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the appropriation of drug free communities renewal grant funds in the amount
of $99,999.
2. Do not approve the appropriation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1, appropriation of the drug free communities renewal grant
in the amount of $99,999.
ACTION NO.
u
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of
$5,120 for the capital improvement incentive grant for
playground safety
SUBMITTED BY:
Sharon Sheppard
Special Education Coordinator
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County Public Schools' (RCPS) preschool program received an enhancement
grant from the United Way's Success by 6 committee in the amount of $2,500 to be used to
help meet state standards specifically in the area of playground safety. RCPS then applied
with the County of Roanoke for the capital improvement incentive grant to obtain matching
funds necessary to purchase playground mats for the high use areas in each of the
elementary school playgrounds.
RCPS has been awarded funding in the amount of $5,120 from the County of Roanoke
capital improvement incentive fund to be used for Project Safe Surface. The goal of this
project is to install playground mats on RCPS playgrounds to stabilize and limit the loss or
displacement of loose-fill material in areas of high traffic and/or kick-out to consistently
meet the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications for surface
material. The target areas will be slide exits and the area immediately under swings.
There are 17 elementary schools in Roanoke County with playgrounds, eight of which host
the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation After School for Kids (ASK) programs. There
are 16 schools which host preschool programs. Both programs are inspected on a regular
basis by a licensing specialist from the Virginia Social Services Department. The
playgrounds have been cited in the past for insufficient surface material, most often in the
target areas mentioned above. Mats of this type were installed at Glenvar Elementary
School (three at slide exits) and Mount Pleasant Elementary School (one under single axis
swing) in spring 2003 and have proven to be very effective.
J~1
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of the mats will be covered by the United Way and CIIF grants. Installation
will be done in-house.
Cost of the project:
. Mats
.. Installation
$7,678
In-Kind
Funding for the project:
In-Kind:
CIIF matching grant
$2,500
2.620
$5,120
5,120
.. United Way grant to preschool program
.. In-Kind for installation (estimated value)
Total
$10,240
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $5,120 for the capital incentive
grant for playground safety.
2. Do not approve the appropriation of funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1, appropriation of funds in the amount of $5,120 for the
capital improvement incentive grant for playground safety.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
]""-8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of
$75,000 from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation
SUBMITTED BY:
JoAnn Burkholder
Student Assistance Program Administrator, Safe and Drug-
Free Schools Coordinator, Roanoke County Prevention Council
Project Director
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This is the second year of a five-year grant from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement
Foundation. The grant is for the amount of $75,000 to fund three part-time elementary
student assistance program (ESAP) coordinator positions. The ESAP instructs the life
skills prevention curriculum, which includes alcohol and other drugs and non-violence
resolution methods, as well as other support services.
Grant funding in the amount of $75,000 has been awarded to Roanoke County Public
Schools to continue to fund three part-time elementary student assistance program
positions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
J-Z
1. Approve the appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $75,000 from the Virginia
Tobacco Settlement Foundation.
2. Do not approve the appropriation of funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1, appropriation of the Virginia Tobacco Settlement
Foundation grant in the amount of $75,000.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
:f-9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from schools to appropriate grant in the amount of
$23,387 from the Governor's Office of Substance Abuse
Prevention
SUBMITTED BY:
JoAnn Burkholder
Student Assistance Program Administrator, Safe and Drug-
Free Schools Coordinator, Roanoke County Prevention Council
Project Director
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This is the third year of a four year grant from the Governor's Office of Substance Abuse
Prevention. The grant is for the amount of $23,387 to fund the student assistance program
coordinator position at Glenvar High and Middle schools. The funding is a four year cycle
with a decrease of twenty-five percent each year.
Grant funding in the amount of $23,387 has been awarded to Roanoke County Public
Schools for the continued funding of the full-time student assistance program position at
Glenvar High and Middle schools.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding was approved in the budget to match the twenty-five percent decrease
allocation.
3-~
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $23,387 from the Governor's
Office of Substance Abuse Prevention.
2. Do not approve the appropriation of funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1, appropriation of the Governor's Office of Substance Abuse
Prevention Grant in the amount of $23,387.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
3"-\0
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and
appropriate grant funds in the amount of $2,743.00 from the
Virginia Department of Health for the purchase of mass
casualty triage equipment
SUBMITTED BY:
Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, awarded the
Fire and Rescue Department a 50% matching grant totaling $2,743.00 to purchase mass
casualty triage equipment. The triage equipment is being placed in a regional mass
casualty trailer to provide emergency medical assistance to citizens or visitors along the 1-
81 corridor or those involved in auto accidents and industrial/manufacturing emergencies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The department has budgeted funds for the 50% match that the state requires for the grant.
ALTERNATIVES:
The department will not be able to purchase the triage equipment without the matching
funds from the state.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the grant funds in the amount of
$2,743.00 into the Fire and Rescue Department's budget.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
3-LI
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from Fire and Rescue Department to accept and
appropriate grant funds in the amount of $12,997 from the
Virginia Department of Health for the purchase of cardiac
monitors
SUBMITTED BY:
Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, awarded the
Fire and Rescue Department a 50% matching grant totaling $12,997.00 to purchase
cardiac monitors. The cardiac monitors are being placed on first run ambulances to provide
cardiac monitoring and defibrillation to cardiac arrest emergencies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The department has budgeted funds for the 50% match that the state requires for the grant.
ALTERNATIVES:
The department will not be able to purchase the cardiac monitors without the matching
funds from the state.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the grant funds in the amount of
$12,997.00 into the Fire and Rescue Department's budget.
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2004
Amount
$9,738,285
July 1, 2004
Explore Park Loan Repayment
20,000
Balance at August 24, 2004
9,758,285
Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only.
Balance from above $9,758,285
$9,758,285
N-I
% of General
Fund Revenues
6.61%
6.63%
6.63%
Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the
General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues
2004 - 2005 General Fund Revenues $147,255,793
6.25% of General Fund Revenues $9,203,487
Submitted By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Submitted By
Approved By
N-d
CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Unaudited Balance at June 30,2004
Amount
$11,389,450.22
Balance at August 24, 2004
$11,389,450.22
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
N-3
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Amount
From 2004-2005 Original Budget $100,000.00
Balance at August 24, 2004 $100,000.00
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
N _L)
FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget
Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund
FY1997 -1998 Original budget appropriation
Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund
FY1998-1999 Original budget appropriation
FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund
FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2001-2002 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Savings from 2001-02 debt fund
FY 2002-2003 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2003-2004 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
FY 2004-2005 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Balance at August 24, 2004
$ 670,000
1,113,043
2,000,000
321,772
2,000,000
2,000,000
(1,219,855) 780,145
495,363
2,000,000
(1,801,579) 198,421
2,000,000
(465,400)
116,594 1,651,194
2,000,000
(2,592,125) (592,125)
2,000,000
(2,202,725) (202,725)
2,000,000
(4,192,701) (2,192,701)
$ 6,242,387
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION NO.
~-~
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Accounts Paid - July 2004
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Payments to Vendors
Payroll 7/2/2004
Payroll 7/16/2004
Payroll 7/30/2004
Manual Checks
Voids
Grand Total
Direct Deposit Checks Total
$ $ $ 6,063,456.26
879,914.21 174,213.33 1,054,127.54
830,876.61 174,250.56 1,005,127.17
780,455.98 134,834.84 915,290.82
10,206.71 10,206.71
$ 9,048,208.50
FINI62 Page
7:54:12AM County of Roanoke, Virginia Date 8/10/2004
Schedult: of Expenditures, Encumbrances and Appropriations
For the 01 Month Period Ended 07/31/04 Year to Date
Expend
Expenditures & Encumb
Monthly Outstanding & Encumbrance Unencumbered asa%of
Fund 100 General Fund Budget Expenditures Encumbrance Year to Date Balance Budget
0101 Legislative 336,720.00 46,153.38 37,809.50 83,962.88 252,757.12 24.94
0102 General & Financial Administra 9,007,642.00 807,287.78 41,300.55 848,588.33 8,159,053.67 9.42
0103 Electoral Board & Officials 272,397.00 13,264.09 0.00 13,264.09 259,132.91 4.87
0100 General Government Administrat 9,616,759.00 866,705.25 79,110.05 945,815.30 8,670,943.70 9.84
0201 Courts 1,126,363.00 88,400.96 0.00 88,400.96 1,037,962.04 7.85
0202 Other Judicial Support 729,685.00 57,792.19 0.00 57,792.19 671,892.81 7.92
0200 Judicial 1,856,048.00 146,193.15 0.00 146,193.15 1,709,854.85 7.88
0301 Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont 10,535,393.00 851,013.00 178,977.00 1,029,990.00 9,505,403.00 9.78
0302 Fire and Rescue 8,723,425.00 621,913.48 127,881.36 749,794.84 7,973,630.16 8.60
0303 Correction & Detention 5,804,127.00 358,399.91 0.00 358,399.91 5,445,727.09 6.18
0304 Animal Control 402,487.00 30,716.79 3,505.60 34,222.39 368,264.61 8.50
0300 Public Safety 25,465,432.00 1,862,043.18 310,363.96 2,172,407.14 23,293,024.86 8.53
0401 General Services 383,977.00 28,130.03 14,000.00 42,130.03 341,846.97 10.97
0402 Refuse Disposal 4,580,879.00 123,748.11 0.00 123,748.11 4,457,130.89 2.70
0403 Maint Buildings & Grounds 3,362,335.00 217,956.31 23,259.73 241,216.04 3,121,118.96 7.17
0404 Engineering 2,523,624.00 107,479.02 3.00 107,482.02 2,416,141.98 4.26
0405 Inspections 895,497.00 74,206.53 0.00 74,206.53 821,290.47 8.29
0406 Garage Complex 346,392.00 102.95- 1,200.00 1,097.05 345,294.95 .32
0400 Public Works 12,092,704.00 551,417.05 38,462.73 589,879.78 11,502,824.22 4.88
0501 Mental Health 0.00 9,080.35 0.00 9,080.35 9,080.35- .00
0503 Public Health 459,403.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 459,403.00 .00
0504 Social Services Administration 3,769,212.00 322,257.06 0.00 322,257.06 3,446,954.94 8.55
0505 Comprehensive Services Act 5,037,171.00 11,491.76 0.00 11,491.76 5,025,679.24 .23
0506 Public Assistance 2,619,500.00 272,582.13 0.00 272,582.13 2,346,917.87 10.41
0507 Institutional Care 33, I 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33, I 00.00 .00
0508 Social Services Organizations 168,585.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 168,585.00 .00
0500 Health and Welfare 12,086,971.00 615,411.30 0.00 615,411.30 11,471,559.70 5.09 Z
I
b
FINI62 Page 2
7:54:12AM County of Roanoke, Virginia Date 811 012004
Schedule of Expenditures, Encumbrances and Appropriations
For the 01 Month Period Ended 07/31/04 Year to Date
Expend
Expenditures & Encumb
Monthly Outstanding & Encumbrance Unencumbered asa%of
Fund 100 General Fund Budget Expenditures Encumbrance Year to Date Balance Budget
0601 Parks & Recreation 3,479,027.00 409,218.29 0.00 409,218.29 3,069,808.71 11.76
0602 Library 2,220,204.00 160,604.62 0.00 160,604.62 2,059,599.38 7.23
0603 Cultural Enrichment 167,068.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 167,068.00 .00
0600 Parks, Recreation & Cultural 5,866,299.00 569,822.91 0.00 569,822.91 5,296,476.09 9.71
0701 Planning & Zoning 597,487.00 33,281.01 0.00 33,281.0 I 564,205.99 5.57
0702 Cooperative Extension Program 94,129.00 816.37 0.00 816.37 93,312.63 .87
0703 Economic Development 602,226.00 39,111.51 0.00 39,111.51 563,114.49 6.49
0705 Contribution to Human Service 95,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,050.00 .00
0700 Community Development 1,388,892.00 73,208.89 0.00 73,208.89 1,315,683.11 5.27
0801 Employee Benefits 2,256,237.00 31,472.05 0.00 31,472.05 2,224,764.95 1.40
0802 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup 35,000.00 67.27 0.00 67.27 34,932.73 .19
0803 Miscellaneous 2,744,267.00 217,705.72 0.00 217,705.72 2,526,561.28 7.93
0804 Tax RelieflElderly & Handicapp 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,000.00 .00
0806 Refuse Credit Vinton 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000.00 .00
0807 Contingency Balance 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 .00
0800 Non-Departmental 5,975,504.00 249,245.04 0.00 249,245.04 5,726,258.96 4.17
0901 Interfund Transfers Out 71,848,705.00 198,309.84 0.00 198,309.84 71,650,395.16 .28
0902 Intrafund Transfers Out 988,318.00 11,193.13 0.00 11,193.13 977,124.87 1.13
0900 Transfers Out 72,837,023.00 209,502.97 0.00 209,502.97 72,627,520.03 .29
Grand Totals 147,185,632.00 5,143,549.74 427,936.74 5,571,486.48 141,614,145.52 3.79
-::2
\
6"""
FINO53
7:53:12AM
Page 1
County of Roanoke, Virginia Date 8/10/2004
Statement of Estimated and Actual Revenues
For the 01 Month Period Ended 07/31/04 Year to Date
Revenues
Monthly Year to Date Unrealized as a % of
Budget Revenues Revenues Balance Budget
64,475,000 392,023 392,023 64,082,977 .61
25,464,846 260,011 260,011 25,204,835 1.02
2,530,000 2,530,000 .00
600,000 36,366 36,366 563,634 6.06
120,000 120,000 .00
7,400,000 7,400,000 .00
6,745,000 250,085 250,085 6,494,915 3.71
5,050,000 46,933 46,933 5,003,067 .93
1,240,000 440,977 440,977 799,023 35.56
1,760,000 33,306 33,306 1,726,694 1.89
1,195,000 1,195,000 .00
470,000 23,795 23,795 446,205 5.06
625,000 22,123 22,123 602,877 3.54
2,860,000 225 225 2,859,775 .01
110,000 6 6 109,994 .01
28,177 1,780 1,780 26,397 6.32
293,700 22,210 22,210 271,490 7.56
243,650 30,570 30,570 213,080 12.55
43,050 7,390 7,390 35,660 17.17
41,735 41,735 .00
25,000 25,000 .00
599,200 1.360 1,360 597,840 .23
400,000 60,337- 60,337- 460,337 15.08-
2,400 1,760 1,760 640 73.34
3,486,554 73,412 73,412 3,413,142 2.11
2,694,267 254,284 254,284 2,439,983 9.44
319,000 143,865- 143,865- 462,865 45.10-
52,000 3,275 3,275 48,725 6.30
750,189 1,499 1,499 748,690 .20
233,000 230,562 230,562 2,438 98.95
4,879,037 196,092 196,092 4,682,945 4.02
1,960,000 321,960 321,960 1,638,040 16.43
4,978,781 75,035 75,035 4,903,746 1.51
2,678,250 321,960- 321,960- 3,000,210 12.02-
179,843 280 280 179,563 .16
2,652,953 24,358 24,358 2,628,595 .92 ""<
\
~
Fund 100
General Fund
010
011
012
013
014
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
034
037
038
039
040
041
042
048
050
051
056
060
061
064
073
080
086
093
Real Estate Taxes
Personal Property Taxes
Public Service Corp Base
Penalities & Interest On Prope
Payment In Lieu Of Taxes
Local Sales Tax
Consumers Utility Tax
Business License Tax
Franchise Tax
Motor Vehicle License Fees
Taxes On Recordation & Wills
Utility License Tax
Hotel & Motel Room Taxes
Taxes - Prepared Foods
Other Taxes
Animal Control Fees
Land and Building Fees
Permits
Fees
Clerk of Court Fees
Photocopy Charges
Fines and Forfeitures
Revenues from Use of Money
Revenues From Use of Property
Charges for Services
Charges for Public Sevices
Reimb-Shared Programs Salem
Miscellaneous Revenue
Recovered Costs
Non-Categorical Aid
Shared Expenses
Welfare & Social Servies-Categ
Other State Categorical Aid
Welfare & Social Services
Other Categorical Aid
Transfers
FINDS3
7:53:12AM
Fund 100
General Fund
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Statement of Estimated and Actual Revenues
For the 01 Month Period Ended 07/31/04
Monthly
Budget Revenues
147,185,632 2,225,514
Grand Totals
Reoort Parameters
Fiscal Month Entered: 01
Report Date Entered: 07/3\104
Fiscal Year Ending Entered: 2005
Year to Date
Revenues
2,225,514
Unrealized
Balance
144,960,118
Page
Date
Year to Date
Revenues
as a % of
Budget
2
8/10/2004
1.51
~
\
~
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER.
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2004.
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of
July 31, 2004.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE:
SUNTRUST CAP
894,933.89
894,933.89
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS:
SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN
100,000.00
100,000.00
COMMERICAL PAPER:
SUNTRUST CAP
548,111.75
548,111.75
CORPORATE BONDS
WACHOVIA CAP
3,156,528.00
3,156,528.00
GOVERNMENT:
ALEXANDER KEY FED
ALEXANDER KEY - Sub Acct
WACHOVIA CAP
SUNTRUST-CAP
40,718,426.66
4,073,287.50
7,997,052.65
11,149,874.33
63,938,641.14
LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL:
GENERAL OPERATION
16,111,278.98
16,111,278.98
MONEY MARKET:
ALEXANDER KEY FED
ALEXANDER KEY - Sub Acct
SUNTRUST - CAP
SUNTRUST - SWEEP
WACHOVIA CAP
WACHOVIA
7,917,095.25
296,290.66
2,569,400.98
4,776,768.60
79,385.88
2,314,424.24
17,953,365.61
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT:
WACHOVIA CAP
654,409.88
654,409.88
TOTAL
103,357,269.25
08/06/04
1 of 1
ACTION NO.
~
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August24,2004
AGENDA ITEM:
Work session to discuss proposed amendment to Chapter 19,
Solicitors and Solicitations, of the Roanoke County Code, to
allow for solicitations in public roads
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In March 2001, Chapter 19 of the Roanoke County Code, Solicitors and Solicitations, was
amended to prohibit solicitations in public roads. The primary consideration at the time of
the amendment was the safety of individuals soliciting in roadways. Since that time, there
have been requests by various non-profit organizations to allow solicitation along roadways
under certain conditions.
This work session has been scheduled for the Board to discuss proposed amendments to
the solicitation ordinance. It is recommended that if changes to the ordinance are deemed
appropriate at this time, that they be structured in a manner that will ensure a fair and
equitable process for all organizations, provide the County the ability to tightly control the
circumstances under which solicitation in public roads will be allowed, and will be easily
administered.
If the Board wishes to proceed with amendments to the ordinance, a first reading will be
held on September 14 and a second reading and public hearing will be held on September
28.
Q
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2004
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
S~1
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Balzer & Associates
12-5/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2004 (Continued from May 4, 2004)
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 24, 2004 (Continued from May 25, 2004)
A.
REQUEST.
The petition of Balzer & Associates, Inc. to rezone 4.83 acres from 11 C Industrial
District with Conditions to R1 Low Density Residential District for a development of
single family housing located at Tract 81-A-2 of Mason Subdivision, Hollins
Magisterial District. (Withdrawn by Petitioner)
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D.
CONDITIONS
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Vicinity Map
- Other
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
11
07/29/2004 23:18
5407728050
BALZER AND ASSOC ROA
PAGE 01/01
BALZER
-
REFI..ECïINC; TOMORRC.W
Job Number: RO400043.00
Re: MCGHEE REZONING
s-
Facsimile Cover Sheet
Date:
Friday, July 30, 2004
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO:
To:
Company:
Fax Number:
CHRIS LOWE
ROANOKE COUTNY
772-2108
This transmittal is from:
Sean Horne
Number of Pages (including cover sheet):
0 Urgent ~ For Review 0 Please Comment
IF THERE IS A PROBLEM IN TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL.
. MESSAGE:
Chris,
On behlaf of Chad Mcghee we are withdrawing the request to rezone Tract B1-A-2 of Mason
Subdivison (taX# 28.13-01-27.05) from 1-1 C to R-1. Please call me with any questions you may
have.
Thanks
Sean Horne
PLANNERS. ARCHITECTS. ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS
ROANO.I(E . RIC¡-IMOND . Né:W RIVI:t< VALLEY. SHENANDOAH VALLE~'
1208 Corporate Circle. Roanoke. Virginia 24018. (540) 7ì2-9580. FAX (5-10) 772-8050
WVvW.hnI7t='.rC"'.r-.
5'-Q
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Pinkerton Properties, LLC (SUP)
21-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 3, 2004
August 24, 2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a
major utility service (stormwater management pond), located at 2820 Byron Drive,
Catawba Magisterial District. (Withdrawn by Petitioner)
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D. CONDITIONS
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
3
LAW OFFIOES
S-à
Edward A. Natt
Please reply to:
P. O. Box 20487
Roanoke, VA24016
Direct: (540) 725-6180
Fax: (540) 772-0126
E-mail: enatt@opnlaw.com
OSTERHOUDT, PRILLAMAN, N ATT, HELSCHER,
YOST, MAXWELL & FERGUSON, PLC
3912 ELECTRIC ROAD, S.W.
P. O. Box 20487
FAX (540) 772-0126
SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153
P. O. Box 279
10~ N. COLORADO STREET
(~40) 389-2349
FAX ("40) 389.9"60
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018.0049
(54-0) 980-0000
July 27, 2004
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Chris Lowe
County of Roanoke
Dept. of Community Development
5204 Bernard Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke,VA 24018
Re:
Pinkerton Properties - Special Use Permit
Stormwater Management Pond
Dear Chris:
This letter is written to withdraw the request to construct a major utility service
(stormwater management pond) heretofore filed by Pinkerton Properties. My client no
longer desires to proceed with said request.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT. PRILLAMAN, NATT, HELSCHER,
YOST, MAXWELL & FERGUSON, P.L.C.
f~D G ~
Edward A. Natt
EAN/csb
pc: VIA FACSIMILE: 562-3211
Mr. Bill Pinkerton
Pinkerton Chevrolet
VIA FACSIMILE: 389-5767
Paul Brown
T. P. Parker & Son
5"'3
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Pinkerton Properties LLC (Rezoning)
20-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
September 7,2004 (Continued from 8/3/04)
September 28, 2004 (Continued from 8/24/04)
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Pinkerton Properties, LLC to rezone 7.83 acres from R1 Low Density
Residential District and C2C General Commercial District with Conditions to R3 Medium
Density Multi Family District in order to construct townhouses, located at the northerly end
of Byron Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D.
CONDITIONS
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
2
~-3
LAW OFFIGES
Edward A. Natt
Please reply to:
P. O. Box 20487
Roanoke. VA 24018
Direct: (540) 725-8180
Fax: (540) 772-0126
E-mail: enatt@opnlaw.com
OSTERHOUDT, PRILLAMAN, N ATT, HELSCHER,
YOST, MAXWELL & FERGUSON, PLC
3912 ELEOTRIO ROAD, S.W.
P. O. Box 20487
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0049
(540) 989-0000
FAX (540) 772-0126
SALEM. VmGINIA 24153
P. O. Box 279
10" N. GOLORADO STREET
("40) 369-2349
FAX ("40) 369-9"60
July 27 2004
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Chris Lowe
County of Roanoke
Dept. of Community Development
5204 Bernard Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Re:
Pinkerton Properties - R-4 Zoning
Dear Chris:
This letter will serve as a request to continue the above matter for one month on
the Planning Commission agenda. As you know, my client is withdrawing the request
for the Special Use Permit for the regional stormwater management facility and, in lieu
thereof, will submit a revised site plan for the multi-family zoning which will include
additional land and additional units. We plan to present this conceptually to the
neighborhood at the meeting on Thursday night with the idea of receiving comments
and revising the plan to formally submit.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, PRILLAMAN, NATT, HELSCHER,
YOST, MAXWELL & FERGUSON, P.L.C.
~[)O~
Edward A. Natt
EAN/csb
pc: VIA FACSIMilE: 562-3211
Mr. Bill Pinkerton
Pinkerton Chevrolet
pc:
s- 3
VIA FACSIMilE: 389-5767
Paul Brown
T. P. Parker & Son
~-3
County of Roanoke
Community DeveIopmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
~eiv~ by:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2Q68 FAX (540) 776-7155
Application fee:
PCIBZA dati::
Placards issued:
Bas dati::
Case Number
.ít~!~i~~ii ' .
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
XJ Rezomng 0 Special Use 0 Varianc~
"." ,,"'" ".'
'.""-:"""""""""""""""""""""-""'".'...'.
.. .'
..:>... "', ':"'" .
. "',,-_.' "'"
0 Waiver
a Administrative Appeal
Applicants" Dame/address whip Phone:
Pinkerton Properties, LL.C. Work: 725-8180
925 N.Electri c Rd., Sa 1E5Tl, VA 24153 Cell if:
a:NfPCT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd., 24018 Fax No.: 772-0126
Owner's name/addresS" wfzip
Pinkerton Properties, L.L.C.
925 N. Electric Rd., SalE5Tl, VA 24153
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt 3912 Electri
Property Location
Northerly end of Byron Road
Rd
Phone #:
Work:' 725-8180
F~_No. iI.: 772-0126
Magisterial DistriCt: &tavba
..
CommUDity Planning axea:
Ho II ins
TM ~~fN8i6~h-gf-gg6. 19-01-12.01 and Existing Zoning: R1 (12.01) IC2C (40)
. f ( , . ~~ço~~rrately ~..:-=- T --d U
SIZe 0 parcel s): Acres: res LõAl.)WJ.g J..4JJ se: vacant
;l¡'~""~:~~~~~i.~ ll~t.t~~~,~j~ii~f.(ii~fm_~~._;":' .'._',-~~.- ~.~.~:.:__:~.:,~,:.'~~.:'--== -"'.,,:,'~
ProposcdZoDing: R-4 (Residential Wulti-Family)
Proposed Land Use: Construct ion of 21 townhouses
'Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, aDd frontage requirements of the req1Jestcd distriCt?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQtJIlŒDFIRST.
"'1:5õës the parcel m=t the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?
IF NO, A V ARIAN ex IS RE Q UIRED FmST
If rezonmg request, are conditions being proffered witl1 this request? Yes No
;~_)11~~¡~~ ~;@~~iiöiii!.;iJ.1Jl~ii;Ji¿~i.= ~-~'~¡~ .!;:~.i .~:~. ,_~L=~~~,.~~~.'=':~;.~'.~=~
. - .
of the RoaDoke County ZoDing OrdinaDCe m order to:
. Yes
No
V3IÎMcclWUVel of Scction(s)
Appeal of ZoDÏI1g Admmistrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Scction(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the applicmon complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF ~
ITEMS ARE MrSS1NG OR INCOMPLETE.
IUS/W V/AA. RlSfW VfAA RJSIW VIM
§E3 Consultation ˧i B In. x 11" concept plan ~ Application f=
. X Application X Metes aDd botItlds description X Proffers, if applicable
Justification Waœr IDd sewer application Adjoitùng property owners
. I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the o-..roer's agent or contract purcha.ser and am acting with the knowledge ax
consentofthCOWDer. O\NER: ~nke~~lr2J~ LLC.-------------
<;- ~
--J
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance. .
The property is presently zoned R-.1 (036.19-01-12.01) and C2C (036.19-01-40). The proposed rezoning
to R-4, with proffers, would allow for the development of twenty-one (21) townhouses on the parcel of
land. The R-4 District is to provide for high-density development within the urban service area with
between twelve (12) and twenty-four (24) units per acre. The proposal for twenty-one (21) townhouses
within this parcel of land will fall within that criterion. As stated in the purposes of the R-4, the proposal
would selVe as a buffer between less intensive (single-family residential) and more intensive (commercial)
uses. The proposal will provide for the development of twenty-one (21) units within five (5) clusters,
ranging in size from two (2) to five (5) units.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The property, as designated in the Community Plan, falls along the border of transition and neighborhood
conservation. Neighborhood conservation allows for attached housing at reasonable density that is not
significantly higher than the existing neighborhood. This, coupled with the buffer provisions, makes this a
reasonable use. A significant portion of the property remains undisturbed. Transition district provides for
single-family attached residential with not more than six (6) units per acre. The proposal falls within that.
criterion and, thus, is an appropriate use.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
Public utilities are available within the immediate area and no significant burden will be placed upon the
public facilities of the County.
F:\U5ERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton Prop JUSTIFICATION REZONING.doc
~-- :;>
~
PROFFERS
Address of Su!2ject Property:
Northerly end of Byron Drive
Tax Map No.:
Part of 036.19-01-40; Part of 36.19-01-12-01
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Pinkerton Properties, L.L.C.
PROFFERS
The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction
with the rezoning request: .
1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the
"Townhouse Development Concept Plan: 21 Townhouses With rezoning to R-4-
Townhouses," prepared by T. P. Parker & Son attached hereto.
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PINKERTON PROPERTIES, LLC.
BY
ITS
\\.IOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton Prop REZONING PROFFERS.doc
Page 1 of 1
S-:2
j
Address of Subject Property:
Northerly end of Byron Drive
Tax Map No.:
Part of 036.19-01-40; Part of 36.19-01-12-01
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Pinkerton Properties, LLC.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
BEGINNING at a point at the northwest comer of Lot 12,
Block 18, Section 4, Montclair Estates (PB 10, PG 7); said
point being at the northeast comer of Byron Drive; thence S.
65° 00' 30" W. 191.02 feet to a point; thence N. 24° 55' 30" E.
180.31 feet to a point; N. 71° 19' 24" E. 57.68 feet to a point;
thence with a curved line to the right having a chord, bearing
and distance of S. 66° 48' 03" E. 200.26 feet, a distance of
219.26 feet to a point; thence S. 24° 55' 30" E. 7.07 feet to the
point and place of BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2:
BEGINNING at a point at the northeast comer of Lot 1,
Block 5, Montclair Forest, as said point intersects with the line
of Section 4, Montclair Estates; thence with the line of
Montclair Forest S. 71 ° 03' 00" W. 464.08 feet to a point;
thence with a new division line through the property of
Pinkerton Properties, LLC (Tax Map No. 36.19-01-40)
to a point; thence N. 71 ° 03' 00" E. 364.22
feet to a point; thence S. 24° 55' 30" E. 463.33 feet to the
point and place of BEGINNING.
\\JOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Pinkerton REZONING LEGAL.doc
Page 1 of 1
1.27
- 2Il28
~
41.
1.28
'e
c:.,
~
~
Zoning: C2C
,
~
01)
i
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
38.
,.
Applicants na.me: Pinkerton Properties, L.L. C.
Proposed Zoning: Rezoning R4
Existing Zoning: R1 (12.1) / C2C (40)
Tax Map No Pt. of 36.19-1-12.1
and Pt. 01 36.19-1-40
""'"
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
'"'"
A
III
I"" ......... -
'"" -.--
.. -_.
- -- \,..
---/ \0".
_00
\\
. -....
MIA PQI _1111 ..-r PQÐ
5PFaAi £JC,,",11C]N NO1£S'
'. - PIICPOSÐI SlalUWA"IÐI I/NWXJÆIfT - LOCA1m 011 TAX NO. O_'...OI-t2.'. 1IIU. IIÐ'I.-Œ 1I<E
DaS1IMO STOIIIIWA'IIJI _T PGIID. LOCA1ÐI 011 TAX IfO. IDII.I...at-.'.
2. .... IlELOC""'1GII OF '8<£ PQÐ 1IIU. DECIIEASE 1HE "lrA1E f1f n.0II" NOD 1HE -.u.UIÆ OF IlAtER" _T
1RA\ÆU oaIO$I LOT ,5, !E~ L ~ mAID. - -"IÐI ""'" c:aø.oEIICIAl. SIttS OF TAX
NOS. ""'.......-n. NOD ....t_...., .... IE IIEROII1EII AllAY""" 'tIC DIS1IIIØ""'- PQNT.
-1Ð.Y 11 AcIIU ~ - -.¡, I[ IIÐIQI1ED ~ 'K OÆII CIWN1. n.- 1MICMII1H£
IŒSIDDI1IAL I.ØIS. 1HI!I1IOES - ClJlSII1\I1t "þ\OlSlCJ " AI ' I[ - -.¡, IIEAOt lit[ - OUtFAlL
PaIIT PQI lItE CMIIAU. 284 - ..- N5A
1 lit[ - SIOIIIIIIA1ØI1INtAŒJIÐOT PGIID. LOCA1m GII 1131.1"'01-'2.'. IS II£QUII[D to f![
COHS1RIICIUI "'" 1HE oaÐ.CPIEIIT ~ 1H! TAX NO. IDII.,...at-,2.' NOD 1H! 1IESŒN1IAI. """110< OF TAX
NIl 1DIL,..I11-411. - CXUln. II 11€ PAST. lIAS [IIJESIQ 1HAT IIEIinŒERs CIICSJII\ ÇT II£QGIIAI.
~1EII IIAIWÐÆIIT PQÐ PQI II1II.18'1£ DElÐ.CI'IÆIftS. .
~ø;;;;~~
¡"""~~'!~ MIA - III
.. lit[ - S1IIIIIYA'IIJI IWIAŒllDIT PIHI .... - 10 NO - DR- PIPE,
UIHEII - - 10 NO II'Ot OIA*O.. 1M: PIItIPOSED PQCI -.¡, DETAIl 111£ "lrA1E OF rIJNf' 10
IIŒT '1H!: Q IOIIEJIT - CI1IIfTY sr_NIDS. 11« IWIIIAILE "lrA1E or n.0II" IS IAS[II GII lHE DIStIll.
n.ow c:ooøIIIIIS RAIHEII - - PllII'OISED n.aw CGIIOI11OIIS. II GÐIEIIIOL - 1HE PIKI'OSED PCHD
-.¡, - AT A M1t CALCLV\1ED FOR :¡o IQIO OF - (Þ$1IIQ - AREA) RA1IÐI 1HNt
A MI1: Clll.CLU1DI nil 0\0 II AaIO or CII- (PIIoPoSm - AREA~
~~
~ "" ..
........ "
LARIIT c:. c:aIIIEII. ET VI
-... --
....-.....
en
JJ
,........ .... ...
11.--- . ,'0"'"
-oc.ou:
DHIIIT Œ
S1t¥i'AfWA 'fER MANAGEJ./ENT POND
FOR
PlNKœ7rW ~JUIES. UC
IIEHõ A PCR1IIII or 'lAX ItQ. 0JI0.It-Ot-I2.1
lItE FIIIIUER IICIITQI, R ESTA1£S SIIU Q.UI
CATAIIEIA MAQS7ÐII.4L lIIS71IJCT
ROANaΠauvn: IIRQf/IA
"II>_~~~ """"rOo"'"
-- ..-..LIL.
- .. ----U..
- .. -..LIL.
-,--.
0& ---...
- ---"""'"'"-
48Þ
TPP&S
ENGINEERS
SUR\€YCRS
PLANNERS
--
----
--....
---
--
T. P. P~_. SO"
¡:;>¡
lfJ
t- :J
Z 0
i.J.I ::t:
¿. ~~
a.. ¡.-O
Oct-'
ld :so I .
> lfJ..¡-ß
i.J.IzW~
°:5'gou
i.J.Ia..ot-,
gt-:J:C""
oa..Zz
~w~z .-
i~~2~
oo...wu
t-UC'l~lfJ
;0
~
.~
'"
Q
H
-.-
-.--.--.--.
-,
\
\
'"
~
I>
III
~
';f
<
'"
0
c-~
() J
5&q
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Double D Mini-Mart
19-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2004
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 24,2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Double D Mini-Mart, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a
car wash, located at 7443 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. John Murphy presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker, Mr. McNeil and Mr. Azar
had discussion over the access locations on Williamson Road and Plantation Road.
Mr. Natt represented the applicant and presented a revised site plan at the public
hearing. Staff and Commission members discussed the zoning ordinance
requirement of no more than one (1) access point every 500 feet on a Primary
Highway. Mr. Natt agreed to comply with county and VDOT entrance requirements.
D.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall be developed in general conformity with the Williamson Road Hollins
Masterplan Design Guidelines, to be administered by planning staff.
2. The site shall have one access point on Williamson Road and one access point on
Plantation Road both of which shall include an entrance and exit lane. The access
points shall be in compliance with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and
VDOT standards.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Jarrell made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the special use
permit request. Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Petitioner:
81 AFF"REPORl "
" "
Double D Mini-Mart, Inc.
S-Lf.
Request:
Request for a Special Use Permit for a car wash on 1.560 acre parcel in a C.2,
General Commercial Zoning District.
7443 Williamson Road (Williamson Road and Plantation Road)
Hollins
location:
Magisterial District:
Suggested
Conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in general conformity with the Williamson Road.
Hollins Village Masterplan Design Guidelines, to be administered by planning staff.
2. The only access for the site shall be located near the southern end of the site on
Williamson Road.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The request for a Special Use Permit for a car wash is supported by the Roanoke County Community Plan if
developed within the framework of the design guidelines that were developed in July 1996 for the
Williamson Road. Hollins Village Masterplan.
1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Site plan review shall be required.
VDOT entrance approval shall be required. A re-evaluation of existing entrances will be conducted by
VDOT during the site plan review process.
A car wash is permitted in the C-2, General Commercial Zoning District, with a Special Use Permit.
The Use and Design Standards in Section 30-85-10 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance require all
new car wash facilities, whether conveyor operated or self service, to be equipped with a water recycling
system for seventy-five (75) percent of the water used.
The subject property is located within the Williamson Road - Hollins Village Masterplan area.
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backoround - The site has been used as the Sunnybrook Garage and Service Station for many years. From
August 11, 2000 until March 30, 2002 the site housed the Sunnybrook Car Care. In 2000 a Special Use
Permit was also required for a car wash. More than two (2) years has passed since that operatíon was
discontinued and the Zoning Administrator has determined that a Special Use Permit wi!! be required for this
site.
Topoqraphy- The site is generally flat.
Surroundinq Neiqhborhood -The subject property is located on Williamson Road at the southwest corner of
Williamson Road and Plantation Road. The properties along both sides of Williamson Road in this area are
zoned C-2. The parcels to the rear of the site are also zoned C-2. The buildings on Dexter Road behind
the site are zoned C-2, General Commercial, but have been and are being used as single family residences.
3.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site LavouUArchitecture - The building is sited to the rear of the property. The applicant and their engineer
have been made aware of the design guidelines of the Williamson Road - Hollins Village Masterplan as
1
£-1
they apply to the appearance of the building and development of the site.
AccessfTraffic Circulation - The site plan submitted with the application shows traffic accessing from
Williamson Road. The stacking spaces are parallel to Williamson Road feeding into the bay on the side of
the building closest to Plantation Road. The proposal has been reviewed by the Roanoke County Traffic
Engineer. The Traffic Engineer is recommending no access from Plantation Road and only one access
point from Williamson Road near the southern end of the site. There is not a left turn lane on this section of
Williamson Road to access this site. This section of Williamson Road is classified as Urban Principal Arterial
and has an estimated daily traffic count of 14, 000 vehicles. Plantation Road adjacent to the site is
classified as Urban Minor Arterial and has an estimated daily traffic count of 9,400 vehicles. The zoning
ordinance only allows one access point at a minimum of 500 feet. The existing site has two access points
on Plantation Road and several on Williamson Road. The Virginia Department of Transportation will
evaluate the existing entrances as a part of site plan review.
Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Fire and Rescue service wi I! continue as presently served. Public utilities are
available to the site.
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The site is designated as Core in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The Core future land use
designation is an area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. land uses within Core areas
may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may be appropriate
for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. This corner site is
identified as a Commercial Economic Opportunity Area in the 1998 Community Plan. These areas are
designated for development or redevelopment for commercial purposes. The site is located within the limits
of the Williamson Road - Hollins Village Masterplan. This plan identifies design guidelines established in
1996 to enhance the appearance of buildings and properties including building materials and facades,
signage, and landscaping that improve the appearance of the corridor.
5.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The subject parcel is designated as Core in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed use
is generally consistent with the Community Plan if developed in compliance with the Williamson Road-
Hollins Village Masterplan Design Guidelines. Staff supports the request with the recommended condition.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING DATES:
#19.8/2004
J. Murphy
PC: August 3, 2004
80S:
August 24, 2004
2
5-1-1
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
~iv~ by:
Application fee:
PCIBZA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Placards issued:
BOS date:
Cue Numb~
\;~ ii!u.g~ -
, - ,,- -,-- , ---,-, ,"---, ""
, , -~ - -:-' -,-""- .,- , ,..-, - ,- , -
,-,- '-, -. -,-" - - - " -,...." '--
. , ".
, --'" -- .
, -., - ,-, -, ,-
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
a Rezoning ¡XSpecial Use 0 Variance
0 Waiver
0 Administrative Appeal
bPplicants name/address w/zip
Double D Mini~rt, Inc.
cia Sunnybrook Auto Wash, P. O. Box 7206 24019
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd., 24018
Phone:
Work: 725-8180
Cell #:
Fax No.: 772-0126
Owner's name/address wJzip
Sunnybrook Ho I d ~ngs, I nc .
P. O. Box 7295, ROanoke, VA 24019
CONTACT: Edward A. Natt, 3912 Electric Rd.,
Property LocanoD
Phone #:
Work: 725-8180
Fax No. #: "'-0126
24018
"
Magisterial District: Ho I I i ns
7443 Wi II iamson Road
Community Plalming area: H, 0 \ \ \ ~ s-
Tax Map No.:
027 .11-02-05
ExistÏJlg Zoning:
C-2
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1.560 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant
;ii~~~~;§~iii4. P$~:,i~~t~jMi:iüi:'j¿~~_'~. ,-;:~~-._- :,'-~,~'_:..._,~..~:',:'-~:"-_.-==~>~~,:.',~-
Proposed Zoning: C- 2
Proposed LaDd Use: car wash faci Ii ty
Does the parcel meet the minimum lotarca, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
"t5õ"es the parcel meet the miDimum criteria for the requested Use Typ~? @ No
IF NO, A V AlUANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST -, -
If rezonmg request, are cond.itions being proffered with this request? Yes No M . .
i!t~ji~j¡~~ ~~_@._.jjf!iiii:i.iiliifjjr.~ii~~i~.~~;~: .;~~,~ _:¿, ._,~~~~~~~=~," ~~'-::~_:=
. -
VariancelWaiver of Sect:ion(s)
of the Roanoke County Zonmg OrdinaDCe in order to:
Appeal of Zonmg Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enc]osed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RJsrw V/AA RIsrw V/AA RJSfW V/AA
00 Consultation Eii' 8 112- x 11- concept plan ~ Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers. if applicable
'. X Justification W mer aDd sewer application X: ~ Adjoining property owners
. I hereby cenify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the lmowledge and
consemoftheowœr. ~~Æ':~~O,^~ings, Inc. ~1~:-'------Tä.D()~i-Mart, InC::.
~ Its
, . ~
S-¿f
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
DOUBLE D MINI-MART, INC.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The purpose of the C-2 District is to provide for a variety of commercial and service-related activities
within the urban service area serving the community. The car wash facility, at this location, would provide
a service to the residents in the area. The C-2 District provides for general commercial uses.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The land use designation for the property in the Hollins service area is CORE.
appropriate for highway-oriented uses.
CORE uses are
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
There should be no negative impact on County facilities, including roads, schools, police and fire.
\\.IOLL Y\SYs\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Double D JUSTIFICA TION.doc
c; - Lf
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,2004
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DOUBLE D
MINI-MART, INC. TO OPERATE A CAR WASH TO BE LOCATED AT
7443 WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-2-5) HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Double D Mini-Mart, Inc. has filed a petition for a special use permit
to operate a car wash to be located at 7443 Williamson Road (Tax Map No. 27.11-2-5)
in the Hollins Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on July 27, 2004; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 24,2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.
That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Double D
Mini-Mart, Inc. to operate a car wash to be located at 7443 Williamson Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community
Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions:
(1 )
The site shall be developed in general conformity with the
Williamson Road Hollins Masterplan Design Guidelines, to be administered by
planning staff.
1
S'- ¿.¡
(2)
The site shall have one access point on Williamson Road and one
access point on Plantation Road both of which shall include an entrance and exit
lane. The access points shall be in compliance with the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance and VDOT standards.
2.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
~...-
.................. ....
~=.;:;;
-.-
VlNIÐ~I^ '3>10NVO~
Sl.N31^131\O'ddVIII 3.l1S
SÐNIO10H >lOO'd8ANNOS
!I~-
_-r-
Co.oo'K .
--
-......-...,
\
.~ ~
' \
./ .
.' Z
~ .
¡g.
,/ rn
I ! .
I ~
i ,- I
! II I
i
~
I
M~~
I ~II
c
J 'i~1 I ~u
ì 11 I. .IJ QI' . - It't<t!, :1 flgl' ml
I 1» 1'1 I . -I Ui .h..1
J l'lt! ~1f' r I II ri¡ljJl ~ "Ii I.
il I HIli II:I:!! I ~t It I:J!.I:I ~ !III ~k'!i 'Iii
:. 11;11 ~'IlltJ 1... iii fCt q. If! 'htib hi
k ! dG! I!II~I.:! ~ ~II ~Illii ~I f !n./i; ..1
I!
I
¡
..
I
-
II"'!..."
~.. ,
. ~I
¡.
¡,-I
<s- ~{
~
~
1-
0
J~~
...1 0 ~
~~,
~ ...~
~
J
2: !;g It'.
"<L~
C::11-1~
cn¿C"\
LUo::<:¡
C<c>
~LL .
..... -7 W
0 '--"""
enD=:!
-~ç
:æ~:J
--«0
~-;'a:
-=;,ml--
S-'I
?
.
-'
~
J ~
pi ~
."..J
70-
,
~~
;t ~
Jt~
0-",
u~
b
ZWrn
zr-.;;
CJ~~......
--IN..-
(1),,<::: C")
W"=::«1l)
-$>c\i
...... t..i:: -0>
..., Wm
"'Z-l
Oo:::!~
cnf!:!~1R
-~::>:r:
:æ~oD-
C-;)a:
'fð~
S-'-I
~
0
tt:
"
0
J~~
~~~
,....~
,J
D--
z~¥-?
~s~~
CI)~ ~
W rr-: ~ to
C ~.I: > ('"../
11 w-O)
:z . ..J cp
O<.,.~o
O-'<:Ì"
CJ)~>~l
-~~::r:
:E<oQ.
c(Ja:
-"~t-a
~- Lf
)
III
,
7
~
-"
rt
UI
4.
. ., lIJ It)
ï-"'- Z ,.....
(I) S7 ~
-.;tt--
. . - (\1..-
(I, ? N
II r rf: « 1[")
, > I
() ..J.... N
l' "Jo,O)
'," '0)
t", " J .
("0' "JD
<""'~-V
(Î} ~Q ~ '!t
. 0..:::' . - ::r:
~.~:;Jb..
c:.:- .. .;> 0
:.. r1:
. j (\11-
~ 1[1
21.
20.
~-¡l
26.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Double D. Mini-Mart, Inc.
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2
Tax Map No 27.11-2-5
«
-..............
"'-i
I
W
EXISTING DROP INLET
RIM ELEV-1057.8
INV.-1055.3 -
EXISTING 68'-15-, PIPE (CONC)
INLET ELEV.-1055.3
OUTLET ELEV-1053.8
EXISTING WATER
liNE, TV? -
EXISTING SEWER
UNE, TV?
WOT SlO
CG-6
REMOVE, EXISTING
CURB CUTS
NEW WOT SlO.
CG-11 ENTR.
WOT SlO
CG-6
REMOVE, EXISTING
CURB CUTS
---
-
--
------
/(',;;5,(;:-;;"':: r~;.":,""-','
q, . ' . c' ":/
/ / ' ~:;,;;'
/,<' /~"'" "
f, ~, '
"i.,.' Dr/ rc~
" ~p;.>
i/ Co o.irtlr)e'
---- " Dell. ílJfJ}lJ/J ,1)1 of
&/OÞf fly
fJe/Jt
--
" X10S1.o
00
C!>oo«
ZI--
OZZ
..JW-
O~C)
J:WO::
~»
0 0 a
Oo::~
o::D..O
m:Ez
>-W«
Zl-O
Z-a:
~OO
00
5-5
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Brookside Auto Sales
22-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 3, 2004
August 24, 2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Jerry Douglas Kidd, Inc. tla Brookside Auto Sales, to obtain a Special Use
Permit to conduct recreational vehicle sales, located at 6718 Williamson Road, Hollins
District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. David Holladay presented the staff report. Mr. Jarrell asked for clarification about
service areas and outside storage of any parts or damaged vehicles. The petitioner
replied that there would be no such outside storage.
D.
CONDITIONS
1. Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service shall be allowed only as an accessory use
to Automobile Dealership, Used.
2. No more than five (5) recreational vehicles will be displayed for sale at anyone
time.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Jarrell made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the special use
permit request, with the two conditions. Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
4
S-5
Petitioner:
Brookside Auto Sales
Request:
To obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service
business on .348 acres, located adjacent to 6718 Williamson Road, Hollins
Magisterial District.
Location:
0 Williamson Road, adjacent to (north of) 6718 Williamson RD
Hollins
Magisterial District:
Proffered/Suggested
Conditions:
1. Recreational Vehicle sales and service shall be allowed only as an accessory use
to Automobile Dealership, Used.
2. No more than five (5) recreational vehicles will be displayed for sale at anyone
time.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request by Mr. Jerry Douglas Kidd to apply for a Special Use PellTlit to operate a Recreational Vehicle
Sales and Service business as an accessory business to his Used Automobile Dealership business at Brookside
Auto Sales. This Special Use permit request consists of one parcel consisting of a total of .348 acres.
The proposed special use permit conforms to the policies and guidelines of the Core future land use designation,
which encourages high intensity urban development uses.
As long as the business continues operating as a used automobile dealership with recreational sales and service as
an accessory, no negative impacts are anticipated. If the Planning Commission wishes to place conditions on the
special use pellTlit, the above-mentioned conditions are suggested.
Recreational vehicle sales and service is defined as Recreational vehicle sales and service in the zoning
ordinance. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a recreational vehicle which can be towed,
hauled or driven, designed and used as temporary living accommodations for recreational, camping travel
uses only. Recreational vehicles shall include travel trailers, pick-up campers, motor homes, tent trailers or
similar devices used for temporary mobile housing and shall also include boats.
A recreational vehicle sales and service business is permitted in a C2 General Commercial zoning district
with a special use permit. Per Section 30-85-21. Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service, of the Zoning
Ordinance:
1. A ten-foot plating strip shall be provided adjacent to any public street right-of-way. Within this planting
strip one deciduous, large evergreen or small deciduous tree shall be plated every thirty (30) linear feet.
Such plating materials shall otherwise comply with the landscaping requirements contained in Section
30-92. (Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards)
2. The storage and/or display of recreational vehicles in the planting strip required above shall be
prohibited.
3. Any recreational vehicle which is missing major mechanical or body parts or has been substantially
damaged shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from public view
and shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining residential district.
1
~-s
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backqround - The Brookside Auto Sales business has been in business in the Roanoke Valley for a total of
10 years at the present Roanoke location. The business operated the first five years as the Shelor Motor
Mile and the last five years to present as Brookside Auto Sales.
10poqraphvNeqetation - The proposed use would not change the site. The site is wooded on the north and
west sides. Williamson Road fronts the site on the east side. The south side of the property is adjacent to
the remainder of the Brookside Auto Sales business parking lot and office.
3.
Surroundinq Neighborhood - The proposed use would not impose an additional impact on the adjacent
properties.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site LavouUArchitecture - There will be no changes in the site or the buildings on the property
Access/Traffic Circulation - The proposed use would not impact local traffic. Vehicular access for the
proposed use would continue to be from the existing used automobile dealership on the adjoining property.
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The site is designated as Core in the 1998 Community Plan. Core land use encourages high density urban
development which is appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based
shopping facilities. The proposed special use permit conforms to the policies and guidelines of the Core
future land use designation.
5.
S1 AFF CONCLUSIONS
The proposed use would not change the site, or impact local traffic, or adjacent properties. The petitioner
supports a condition that limits the Recreational Sales and Service as an accessory use to the current used
automobile dealership businesses as well as the display of no more than five (5) recreational vehicles at any
one time. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider the following conditions for the Special Use
Permit:
1. Recreational Vehicle sales and service shall be allowed only as an accessory use to Automobile
Dealership, Used.
2. No more than five (5) recreational vehicles will be displayed for sale at anyone time.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING DATES:
22.8/2004
Tammi L. Wood
PC: 8/3/04
BOS: 8/24/04
2
, .
C, k
.....;-..)
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
, ,.' .'" "'. .".'. . "'...' ..,'
Received by:
DH,
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
PCfI!.bA. dare:
~
"".... .",'. "-'" '" ...,.. . ,..'...' .'..
,..,.. .. ,..,." ..
. .
, ... . .....' -" .. _..
,".L . ,.. ...'
. """"" "".,-.....
Check type of applicarljln med (check all that apply)
0 ~zoning IQ"'Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appe:a1
Applicants name/address w/z!n. ^ __,r 7'/"~ r¿t1:z:.f¥: ~ Phone:~..1t¿ -""n7:J
..~t /)ol/.GM-f'.:~~~7/rt~" ~ Work: ~..lt,~-'1/IJ
~ 7/"'Z' ~I L~ oH tll>.. ' Cell #: .
,P.ø#l~JIi;'VÁ :~I 'Fax No.: cN.ð) ';¿;.z..-9?Y~
~~:: #::ø5 jg;:J/;jd
Fax No. #: ..f\Jð-$ ¿~_.9iritV-
Magisterial District:
Jf 0 L t...::QIr
Cornmll1lÏty P1amili:1g area: jfð L-L.:;I:)j..1
..r;,,2.
Existing Zoning:
d-:z. r .
. ---
Size of parcel(s): Acres: Existing Land Use: ~ "t~ .sz:z.£ b J ¡,{-"..
"""'~~'.,:"::;:'};"~.-;;:~'~ :t4.t.".-"'~RMti:J'~~;~~'~""ff',-::-,~":~'~:i":::~-":'~' ,'.""""'._,. -"""'-'-'" ,.'
:':;:::iJ:rl.:ßl'Æ.Ç-.. ,: ~ ..: H~W r~"';':~:'::i~;::~~l~~;~§L;:::'WJg~¿gf{~fYtì... ':..:-'-_'.m....._.-.......-,,'. ,-,-"",'-_-'h-~_'.""
~pEJ.:t;4-L J¡(f I!i
Proposed Zoning: .
Proposed Land Use: L:"p.~~ ~ 10 {,Itf115.
Does the parcel meet the min.imum lot area. width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
~ No IF NO, A V AlUANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the mirümum criteria for the requested Use Type? tfiS> No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezomng request, are conditioDS being proffered with this request? Yes No N. ~
f-':~ '~",'~~~Ji!.:#m~~ ~:'#JM-ijil¡m!.M.~~';iiii~iiiiiŒ;iJ¡,.."~:~'~-~-; .,'~.~-;.;~:~ "-':"~~~"~~ ~~~~,,' '.-"':,:.~;.':.:~~
JlÁ
VariancelWaiver of Section(s)
of the Ro.anoke County Zoning Ordin31lCe in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WJLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RJSfW'V/AA RJS/W V/AA RJSIW V/AA
rn Consultation Eii 8 1/2" X 11. concept plan EB Applicarlon f~e
Application Metts ami bounds description Proffers. if applicable
Justification Wa1J:.r and sewer application Adjo.irúng prop~rty owners
, I::;'::; ::;,~ =- Ib' 0","" of "'" P"'P"': ~o~ ~ pw<IwOT and"" >Cting with "', knowledg, ..d
~ Owner's S1gnAture
f')
----- -~-
C-- r-
~ >-:.;
t.~~.~9~~ON-FOR.~ZdNiN~'.~~:~?,~:~~"~~;.~:#'#~_~3#.~~'",,~' _.:.:.' '-'._..-'.:~:':.:'~'.-~'.'.~,~'-'-::'.:'.'--:
Applicant
-:J1;)jL~J. ~/)/J¡;.ClAf1~~"m£' r.-ðl J~o/ð!d£ A-ur2' £4-L£J
The Planning Commission will stUdy rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for
the change Îll tenns ofpllblic health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
begimring of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
AL/-£J wd :L;'/'I J.-- .2.. 2-ð)./:J:H (;
¡) 'I ~;Æk--'-/I-L- US'£. PE¡t¡~
ð:z::r~
j() ~rs. . -
'5 W.Jjf /V.,þ1..!v-r t\.J.JJ \ (j !..- ((
r-o(.::rJ~¿..çc-t- ~~. :"¡f\"S, 0. :zi¡
Please explam how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained m the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
fJ~ ~t-L lÞH-7:Q/lA£ 7?J i¿
MN' ~r VV'r:D7/I 771£. ~ /l.flÞ.)r lA..fli'
ð ¡: 7lfÆ PP () ;£(1. '7< ~.é. .r ~/ 77I.Æ AfJEA " 23T
~£.L f¡! Or /J.l--t/!;L:;4-7£ ~)IJ ~t5>A-llt1)L/-
do úl'lr'l 1" d-o t11>~JI.Þ.N f!:z= v£ P LA/-AI.
,
Please desCD'be the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjommg propemes, and the surrounding area, as well
as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation and fire and reSC1le.
7#£ j)/)ð PS¿ rl V\-Z L L
A-/J ~-(E I:14 P ~
p{lo~ A-11 /) ~
¡ff/ f .!:L~ jJ A-d-r ð ,N
)/4- ~ )oJ /!J
é')/Ý 77~.£ ~(:M()I.{Hþ~r;
Vv:r' ,Þ l. H IJ r I-IA- V £
/JPlJì /'rd ~.dlv~
;o.'
(--. r:'
~-J
ü'."""".---' .o. """-"""--""""",,-,,,,,,'o."'o..o...o.....,....o..o."""'o.o.,.-.'.."'.",.,,,',.,'-,.....','0"""""""'..'0_".,,0.'."I
I~:~~~~~ÖNFOR~~GË~~~:~~,'~,'.""........."" """',""" ,
Applicant
Th~~Oning Appeals is re~ed by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a
varlánce can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your OWIl words, describe how the request meets
each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and sIDùl be in harmony with the intended spirit and Pïose of the
Zoning Ordinance.
/
2. The strict applicaûon of the zoning ordirumce would produce undue hardship; a ha1'CÍship that approaches confiscation (as
distinguished from a spe:cial privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreatoIUbly restrict the use of the property.
3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the s e zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed
by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zo . g Ordinance.
e of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district.
, .,
C"' ¡-.
,~- --,)
f~~~Ù~~ÖNFORAD~~~:~~~~.~~~~,~:.'.:...__._..." ,..._~.~.,'~.-........,..,...~._..................
'..." ,.....
Applicant
Please respond to the fenewing as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. Reasons for appeal:
!
i
/
/
,/
,/
//
//
//
/
/
/
. //
2. Eyidence supporting claim:
, ..
s-s
. , . ... ,.. ,"" .. I
"""""-"-"'-"""'--""',,-"""""..,,~,..,-... ......................'., .'
'r~~~~!#..~~i\N.?HËc~x~f',:.~..",~:""".."~~.......'._..:.:~.-.-....'-......... '.
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphlcally depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potcntia1land us or
design issues arisíng ftom the request. In such cases involving rezoniD.gs, the applicant may proffer conditions to r t the
future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by ounty
permitting regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance f a building
pennit. Site plan and building permit procedl1Ics ensure compliance with State and County development regu, . ODS and may
require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezo . g or imposed on
a special use permit or variance, the concept plan mRY be altered to the extent permitted by the zo' disnict and other
regulations .
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use peimit, waiver and variance applica ons. The plan should be
prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the Datur of the request. The Cowrty
PlamùDg Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, b t the following are considered
mUrl.m:um:
i.
The ZD1ÚJ1g and land use of all adjacent properties
All property line$ and easements
All buildings, exisûng md proposed, and . ensions, floor area and heights
Location, widtl:1s and names of all exis' or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
Dimensions and locations of all dri ways, parking spaces and loading spaces
ALL APPUCANTS
a. AppHcant name and name of development
b. Date, scale and north arrow
c.
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
d. Location, names of O'WDers and Roanoke County tax IIlap
e. Physical features such as ground cover, natur::l1 water
f.
- g.
h.
- j.
ONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANTS
Additional information required for
k. Existing uillities (w cr, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
1. Any driveways ntrances/exits, curb openiD.gs and crossovers
m. Topograph map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
n. Appro ate street grades and site distances at intersections
o. La tions of all adjacent fire hydra:nts
- p. ÁIly proffered eùnditions at the site and how they are addressed
- q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule
I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete.
Signature of appljcant
Date
it:'
5'S
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2004
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JERRY
DOUGLAS KIDD, INC. TIA BROOKSIDE AUTO SALES TO CONDUCT
RECREATIONAL VEHICLES SALES TO BE LOCATED AT 6718
WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.18-1-5.1 AND 5.2) HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Jerry Douglas Kidd, Inc. Va Brookside Auto Sales has filed a petition
for a special use permit to conduct recreational vehicles sales to be located at 6718
Williamson Road (Tax Map Nos. 27.18-1-5.1 and 5.2) in the Hollins Magisterial District;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on July 27, 2004; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 24, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.
That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Jerry
Douglas Kidd, Inc. Va Brookside Auto Sales to conduct recreational vehicles sales to be
located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in
accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section
15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
1
~-5
(1 )
Recreational Vehicles Sales and Service shall be allowed only as
an accessory use to Automobile Dealership, Used.
(2)
No more than five (5) recreational vehicles will be displayed for sale
at anyone time.
2.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
----- ------------
. \ \ \ \. .
\ 0 °0 \ ~
i '.. \,'\ ~
0 0 0 . .
\ \ 00 \ '\ ~
j \ \ \ ~. \
'" ,
I '\ ~
J \ i \
. .
\ ~
\ ~
.-.
~
--0
--- ("'" 5
--- :",,:)-
-'" --
0 --
-:!.----
->
vi
5
J
1.
--
-- 0
-----
--
--
--
15
6811
2
1
1
~
~
3.
4
6717
6.
6711
..........
\
1
(;921
3.
10
3
t.s
12
6913
2.
13.
12.
2
11
1,]2
69U5 1. IA
18
1.1
116
128
Deer
1.
4.0.
'>t'.s
IQ
3.
4
..
a
¡
%
~
F- /.iøn
""
15.
14.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Jerry Douglas Kidd., Inc.
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2C
Tax Map No 27.18-1-5.1,5.2
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Virginia PCS Alliance, PC dba NTELOS
23-8/2004
5-~
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 3, 2004
August 24, 2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Virginia PCS Alliance, LC dba NTELOS, to obtain a Special Use Permit
to construct a telecommunications facility, located at 7401 Barrens Road, Hollins
District
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Antonio Edmonds, 6415 Garrett Lane, spoke in favor of the request. Mr. Edmonds is
also an employee of NTELOS.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. Tim Beard presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker inquired about the possibilities
of installing the proposed tower at a height less than the requested 199 feet and the
likelihood of minimizing the proliferation of the new broadcast towers in the vicinity if
the subject request is granted. NTELOS staff replied that, if approved at 199 feet with
antenna attachments, loading capacity and vendor equipment as indicated, this
project would provide for an unspecified period into the future. General Services staff
stated that public safety radio communications should be boosted by the higher tower
height. Mr. McNeil asked if the county would be protected if the petitioner abandoned
the site and the old communication tower had already been removed. NTELOS staff
replied that the county could purchase the tower in the event of abandonment by the
carrier(s).
D.
CONDITIONS
1. The site and location of the broadcast tower shall be in conformity with the concept
plan prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associates PC, revision dated June 18,
2004.
2. The broadcast tower shall be constructed only in conjunction with the facility
compound shown on sheet S-2 of the concept plan.
3. The maximum height of the broadcast tower shall be 199 feet.
4. Per Federal Aviation Administration review, no marking or lighting of the proposed
antenna tower is required and none shall be installed.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Jarrell made a motion to make a favorable recommendation, reading from a
finding of facts, for the special use permit request. Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
ATTACHMENTS:
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
5
S -l-)
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner:
Virginia PCS Alliance (NTELOS)
Request:
This is a Special Use Permit for the construction of a 199-foot high
monopole broadcast tower as part of a telecommunications facility
proposed within a compound containing up to five lease areas on
property zoned C-2 General Commercial. '
Location:
7401 Barrens Road - Hollins Fire & Rescue Station
Magisterial District: Hollins
Suggested
Conditions: 1) The site and location of the broadcast tower shall be in substantial
conformity with the concept plan prepared by Patton Harris Rust &
Associates PC, revision dated June 18, 2004.
2) The maximum height of the broadcast tower shall be 199 feet.
3) The broadcast tower shall be constructed only in conjunction with
the facility compound shown on Sheet S-2 of the concept plan.
4) Per Federal Aviation Administration review, no marking or lighting
of the proposed antenna tower is required and none shall be installed.
Executive Summary:
Virginia PCS Alliance is requesting this Special Use Permit for a 195-foot high monopole
broadcast tower plus four-foot high lightning rod to be constructed within a 3,400-square foot
compound at the Hollins Fire & Rescue station on a C-2 zoned tract. The proposed tower
and compound would replace an existing lOa-foot county communications tower. The site is
designated Neighborhood Conservation by the 1998 Community Plan. The proposed facility
does not conform to Neighborhood Conservation guidelines.
1.
Applicable Regulations
Broadcast towers are permitted in the C-2, General Commercial District only by SUP.
Site plan review and review for compliance with Emergency Communication Overlay
District regulations are required. VDOT has stated that no impact on site access is
anticipated. The project is subject to FCC licensing requirements and FAA approval.
2.
Analysis of Existing Conditions
Background - The petitioner reports that no available structures exist within the area
of suitable height, design and location to provide needed infill cellular communications
on Peters Creek Road south of its intersection with Williamson Road. Among the site
options considered before choosing the subject parcel were the following: the existing
[lIe station monopole; First Team Auto Mall property; vacant land behind Pizza Den,
industrial properties along Hitech Road in addition to Roanoke Regional Airport. Site
rejections were generally due to coverage limitations and leasing issues. The100-foot
high existing tower will be dismantled and removed. The proposed project has been
determined "no hazard to air navigation" per the FAA and will not require marking or
~- ~)
lighting. No new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed.
Topography/Vegetation - The project site is generally level facing Barrens Road and
Peters Creek Road 300 feet to the south. The proposed compound's specific location is
east of and behind the station composed of approximately 3,400 square feet that is now
gently rolling grass with scattered deciduous trees adjoining First Team Auto Mall. The
tract's remaining roughly 2.4 acres is mostly brick and asphalt with side and rear
perimeter landscaping. Per Sheet S-2 (site plan and elevation) submitted by the
applicant, the ground elevation of the proposed tower is 1089.5 feet above mean sea
level; the maximum tower height would be 1288.5 feet above mean sea level.
Comparatively, the height of the south peak of Tinker Mountain (three miles northeast) is
2274 feet and the peak of Green Ridge (1.4 miles northwest) is 1724 feet. Read
Mountain peaks at 2353 feet three and one-half miles east ofthe subject parcel. Zone X
FEMA floodplain designation applies - determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain.
Surrounding Neighborhood - The property fronts on Barrens Road approximately 300
feet north of its intersection with Peters Creek Road. Adjoining on the east and north is a
C-2 zoned auto dealer. To the west and south across Barrens Road stand R-l zoned
residences whose occupants would be the most affected neighbors. Beyond these
adjacent uses are a variety of retail and service commercial, institutional and higher-
densi ty residential uses.
3.
Analysis of Proposed Development
Site Layout / Appearance - The proposed concept plan indicates a 199-foot high new
monopole broadcast tower within a fenced compound containing lease areas for business
commurications providers NTELOS and T-MOBILE and relocated Roanoke County
equipment in addition to two other future lease areas. The tower will be of galvanized
steel with flat matte finish and will have attached directional panel, omni-directional anå
whip antennas. The facility will be accessed by the existing Hollins station dual entrances
on Barrens Road. Utilities for the proposed tower are to be underground; the general area
is served by overhead power lines. This property is located in close proximity to
commercial/economic opportunity areas adjoining the south side of Peters Creek Road
as illustrated in the 1998 Community Plan. The 1998 Plan also states that Hollins
Community Planning Area residents advocate respect for the viewsheds of Read and
Tinker Mountains by requiring future communication and transmission towers to be
unobtrusive and aesthetically pleasing.
Potential Site Limitations - The proposed 199-foot height of the replacement tower
represents the maximum permitted by the Federal Aviation Administration without
lighting and is the maximum permitted by ordinance section 30-87-2(D)1. Additionally,
the proposed tower height is twice that of the existing county communications tower
standing at the rear (northwest) corner of the fire & rescue building. By letter dated May
18, 2004, the FAA informed the applicant that the proposed structure does not exceed
obstruction standards per its aeronautical study an.d issued a "determination of no hazard
to air navigation." The same letter also noted that the petitioner is not relieved of
compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance or regulation of any federal,
c; -~. /p
state or local government body.
Neighborhood Meeting - On July 14, 2004, a citizens' meeting was held at the Hollins
Library with representatives from NTELOS in order to provide information about the
request to neighbors. Although more than 200 invitations were sent to property owners
within a one-quarter mile radius of the station, only county officials, staff and NTELOS
representatives attended.
Access / Traffic Circulation - Access to the proposed tower will be from existing points
on Barrens Road. The facility will not include employees and no significant traffic
impacts are expected per VDOT and county engineering staff. The posted speed limit on
this segment of Barrens Road is 35 miles per hour.
Fire & Rescue / Utilities - Public water and sewer currently serves the property. Fire and
Rescue services are onsite.
4.
Conformance with Roanoke County Community Plan
The 2.5 acre subject property is designated Neighborhood Conservation by the 1998
Community Plan. This designation delineates areas where established single-fan1ily
residential neighborhoods exist and where conservation of the development pattern is
encouraged. Land use types are normally limited to residential and small-scale
institutional and low-impact commercial uses in Neighborhood Conservation consistent
with adopted design guidelines. Communications towers are not discussed within this
land use category. As noted previously, natural resource policy within the Hollins
community calls for respect of the Read and Tinker Mountain view sheds by requiring
that communication towers be unobtrusive and aesthetically pleasing. The im.rnediate
potential for visual impact will be on nearby homes. However, it is Roanoke County's
intent to comply with applicable provisions of the Federal Telecommunications Act of
1996 and other applicable laws pern1itting communications businesses the opportunity
to provide services within their designated areas.
5.
Staff Conclusions
The site contains an existing community facility which has utilized a communications
tower at one-half the height of this proposed structure. Although zoned C-2, the future
land use designation is Neighborhood Conservation at this location. The proposed tower
is a monopole design with multiple antennas and is not on or near a ridge line. The
proposal confonns generally to broadcast tower requirements as outlined in the zoI1ing
ordinance. In consideration of this request, staff suggests that the petitioner exhaust all
design options, particularly alternatives to lower the height of the proposed monopole, in
order to construct the new tower in the most unobtrusive manner possible should the
Planning Cormnission choose to make a favorable recommendation on this petition.
Case Number:
Prepared By:
Hearing Dates:
23 - 8/2004
T. Beard
PC - August 3, 2004
BOS - August 24, 2004
, '.
- ._-------~- ---_._---~------
(
(~- ';
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
S--I.o
P1acards is.roed:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Case Number
.,,-.-,. ,~,,"-""""-"'" ',.' .." ',,-,', ",....,..' .- ..,-......-.'0"_"'-"""""""., .. ""-"-"""---,""'.," -~ -'..-....,""", '-,
:,¡,:;~.:~'_:'-; "\~p-'~~,::~..~..,'.,~t::-.. ',--~,,_:,-~) - ,
~.._. ,..",....",..",_...-....,~.'."..;,':._...--.., ""'-""'-"""-"'-
Check type of app~on fiJed (cbec;k all that apply)
a RezoDÌng /1Í.special Use (J VariaDce a Waiver (J Administra1Îve Appeal -
Applicants mune/addr~ss w/zip ~.r ~UJ:S . Phone: ,$'t/6 -ii/ t . 3l,¿;IC - ,
Virlj\n,c\" ptS AlllanlT-', t....c..: òb~ I~ ' -Work: S"I')1'- - - - -. "
\I 50 5h eY'\{'\.nlJc.~ h \f ¡\ \~ l~ , pt'" . ' Cell #: 54 o. l..tf¡ .-S't!U;D ' ..
\rJc. "t'S\,~ýC ,vA ~-z...ø¡ ~ c. 0 Jt>sìt.. \!~¡\t~H:.Y- 'FaxNo.: 'S'tO-'~3Z -:z,2,..lc,
Owner's name/address wlzip.. Phone #: '}1Ic.. 381-- ~'l.c Ö
~Œf"Ib\Le-- (p1J..'{\+¡ a6Cl.~~ c"t- $:JrL'rv"lso-ri Work: f:)t\~-c,..
P-o,ß~¡. z...q'i(OÓ ^ \.J' r- . Fax No. #: $'4().-3.Br--CöIt z..:
12.~C{ c'(e VA z.4Clf t:.v. y\t'\¿ v,aW"lt.. \; rttn ..
Property Location . Ma.' rial D' '. tL i \ ' S .
fttl lit'\ '> gc '7(,&.{ c..- S~" ~ Cof'\ -:t s- g1Ste lSttict., fll; 1"-
1(.jOI ßCòrrtf'\S iZJ Community p1"....:.... area:
~f'\.6'U 1. 014 ~
Tax Map No.: 6'2.')-. Ib - eLf -e( . tIC - 0000 Existing Zoning: (,2-
Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~..51 ç.,C- Existing L:md Use: Pi-lb Ii l/ - 'Re S¿Lt é.- S~.i1 ~.~
.:-'~~""'-'.':"~;.::)j¡~S';~~~~~ ~ ;-¡SE.,'~:n¡:~~:;~1~"~;;';'B.:~""."-,;'~:;~~,;::;~~>:.~~S;:~' ..-'."" --.., "',' --','" ---,',"',-' ',""""""-' ., ""..
'. .- '~~:,f:f'.~.+1ft- g".- C', ~f.~'~~1¥. !f.~r~~Mf:t'4~:f&.\RJ. :-~..'-! L ---:~- --" .--,-,-- -.' ,",-" .~-, --'.. ---~-.. '
Proposed ZoDÏI1g: N/A
Proposed Land Use: j(e let c:t M U\. t \--e.l t COrn ." U Y) (' u..-h ~ f\ ~ -Th-c.d l
Do~ the parcel m~ the minimum lot area, width. and fromage requirements of the: requested district?
@. No IF NOt A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST" '
Does the parcel meet the miT1imum criteria for the requested Use Type? ~ No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoDing request, are c:on9itions being proffered with tbjs request? ' Yes No ,
,~,-",,"-""""" .....'.-,-.,." ,-' ,-,--,' ' "-,,,,_,,:,,~,,-{,'-'-<'^""""-'-"'--"'--"'--"'-""""'.":""""".,-,-"..,...""_"...-,..,,.. ",-"""',,,,-..---,-....--. .-,.-.,--:"",.,.
~:'~~:,Jt4!m~~:M?,_mm~t~!.~lJfif~i~~lfY.~i~~~:...~. !:,~'~~::~, '_:'~~~ ~-_W"~".-:.~~.
Appnca.óOD fee;
ð .óÒ
Vari.a.ncelWaivcr of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning OrdÏnancl: in order to: '
, Appeal of Zoning Admmistrator's decision to
. Appeal of Interpretation of Secnon(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordimnce
Is 1he application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY' OF THESE;
I'IEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RlSfW V/AA Rlsrw V/AA RJsrw VIM, '
Ern Consultation [äi 8 1/2' x 11" concept plan ~ Applicarlon fee', .
Ap~licari.on , Metes and bounds des.c~tion W '" ~~e~. ü a.pplicable . : .
Ý JustificafiOD . WatI:r and ~ewer application AdJommg property owners
I hereby certify tbat I am either the owna of ~ p~r1y or ~ oWDer'~ agent or coIJ!ract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and'
consent of the owner. Cì~~ rt (;6..e~ -. Owncc's Signature -
I
"", ,.
BROADCASTING TOWERS AND ASSOCIATED ANTENNA PERMITTED BY RIGHT:
. New and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height
and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district provided: "
a) the proposed tower is a monopole type design: " " "
b) the general area of the proposed tower is cUITently served by above ground utilities including
electric power and telephone poles: and
c) all other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated
facilities are met. " " " . ." :. . "
. Antennas may be installed on any existing structtu"e within the. County pro~ded Sald.åntenná Qoes not meëi
the definition of à broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing stIuctui'e more than"ten
(10) feet, and does notresuIt in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that
zoning district.. "".
. "Tern 0 towers erected for a
The following information shall be required as part of the Special Use Permit for a Bro"adcaSt Tower in "
addition to standard application requirements. I ..
Proposed Site Qualities
Utilities that are currentl esent on site:
Utilities required that are not currently present on site:
Ex ected route oflînka e:
-~
~
~
Estimated noise level in decibels:
Broadcast Tower
~tructure Type: ~OPOle
0 Other (description)
Proposed height of tower excluding antenna:
0 Lattice Tower
0 Guyed Tower
0 Stealth Désign (description)
lq q t
Existing height of sUrrounding tree canopy and/or buildings: .
Construction material and finish of tower: Specific tower location
Material: ~ l/AM t;'£.¡j Finish: ~e.. Longitude: 0 "
Ground Elevation in mean sea level of the proposed tower site:
Latitude:
.0
..
Tower has structural ability to accommodate:
DOne
ŒJ Two
5 s of Antenna or Other Devices Attached to Tower
Omni-Directional Antenna Directional Panel 0 Parabolic Antenna
0 Other
Material and finish of the proposed antenna(s).
Material: Finish:
0 Whip Antenna.
Dimensi ODS of Antexma( s )-height/widthl depth
I I "
1
..." .
(-~. ~
The following information must be submitted separately in either a written or mapped format. S -to
01 Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicant's existing communication system including
number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site.
0 A map designating the specific coverage area(s) desired with any overflow areas denoted separately.
0 A list, with a map, of all the alternative sites considered or evalUated to serve the area of this proposed tower,
including other existing tower sites in the vicinity. llis should include any co-locations considered and the
specific technical, legal or other reasons the other site(s) were rejected.
OJ Provide conceptual site plan drawn to scale, depicting the location of support stnlctures, equipment enclosures,
landscaped areas, fences, lighting, access, limits of disturbed land, average slope of the site, ownership and use of
adjoining properties, etc.
0 Provide accmate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the'relationship of the proposed broadcast tower '
and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations should include the relàtionships of any new. '
or modified Toad or utiliß' corridors necessary to servè the proposed broadcast tower site.' ' .'
, .
0 Provide computerized te~in analysis shoWing the visibility of the pro~sed broadcast tower and antenna at
the requested height and location. Ii new or modified road, access or utility corridors are propo,sed, the terrain
analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. '.
0 Provide detail sheet for broadcast tower structure.
I
0 Provide an accurate description and photograph of the proposed tower structure, ~cludIDg antenna.
0 Provide detail sheet of any antenna or devises attached to to~er including electrical and mechanical
specifications for antenna systems. '
Notes:
-c!í sw({~ +L~ ~ 1
-fv.r 'YV l c' ~ h.
IV +-'e.k ~ ..v' -( ~b ¡/ t!.--
I de.. $ fJ rat I ~í1 ,Sv;.-#o- e.;
IAflh,t ~ ~ e.- Ct - '7f l: t.-A..7 s: I w'tft. ,;¡... -f1,. ~ J
Ci.ffì4'" I flolJ' Co¡..I'Í\ ~~v...¿
.- J. ¡ (CJ; IJ r.,J.. V()")-.. Vt-.¡; ..::d '1 w.. eo e>f-.:.. (
I hereby certify that:
. All required submittals to the FAA, as required by Zoning Ordinance Section 30-87-2D.6. have been
submitted.
. A required on-site balloon or comparable test will be performed on the dates of
Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for . , and on the dates of
for the Board of Supervisors public hearing scheduled for .
. L the applicant, shall be responsible for a/lfees associated with the filing of the application, including !he
reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the County to verify the need for the new
broadcast tower.
for the
Signature:
Date:
2
s-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORSAT A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY,
AUGUST 24, 2004
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VIRGINIA PCS
ALLIANCE, LC dba NTELOS TO CONSTRUCT A
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY TO BE LOCATED AT 7401
BARRENS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-4-1) HOLLIINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Virginia PCS Alliance, LC dba NTELOS has filed a petition for a
special use permit to construct a telecommunications facility to be located at 7401
Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.13-4-1) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on July 27, 2004; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 24, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.
That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Virginia
PCS Alliance, LC dba NTELOS
to construct a telecommunications facility to be
located at 7401 Barrens Road in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord
with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is hereby
approved with the following conditions:
1
s~-~
(1 )
The site and location of the broadcast tower shall be in conformity
with the concept plan prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC, revision
dated June 18, 2004.
(2)
The broadcast tower shall be constructed only in conjunction with
the facility compound as shown on sheet S-2 of the concept plan.
(3)
(4)
The maximum height of the broadcast tower shall be 199 feet.
Per Federal Aviation Administration review, no marking or lighting
of the proposed antenna tower is required and none shall be installed.
2.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
-------------- --- -
\
Zoning C2
c.o.
2.
8")(6"
REDUCER
S2.
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants nam.e:Virginia PCS Alliance,
L.C. dba Ntelos
Proposed Zoning: Special Use -
Existing Zoning: C-2
Ta:r: Map No 27.13-4-1
s
S-b
~l
:.J
'\
P:lProjocll"D52!l-3qlEngt\Pfans\constructJon D"IMngslsllepllns,dwg, 0612'12004 01:35:38 PM
~
p
::u
:: >-
;-~ '1:
<> - ::r:
::r:z:
II ~ .-
()
~~ en
? . ()
0 >-
~
i
¡¡
/
/~
..'/ /
I
I
I
0
II>
1-
..
I;cn
~~
-. "U
;s:
'Z
""'~".
~
.....
.....
~
/
I
I
, i ~~¡ s-
, ¡fj¡fj~rt
'-.... : ~ ~!õ~ i'
'I--"~ ~i' !
~t ,I .
"'i /
~"v
/
~
n I
! I
/
I':S:;:
~~
1"0
=-0
0
r-
m
m
r-
m
~
::t
0
z
IH'-D" 'lIP IF IJGIf1HINI¡ IICD
"S'-D" 'lIP OF 1IONDPaL. lAD ŒJI1D IF N1ElOS A/ItEMIAS. SEC'ItIIS .. .. - c
II5'-Ð' lAD CDnEII IF 1-IID8L[ A/I'IENNAS
170'-Ð' IOAIIDlC[ c:DUN'N - AH1ÐINA5
ISQ'-D" IOAIIDlC[ c:DUN'N - AN1EIINAS
II>
I ..
..
~
~I
;j
Is
;
i
~
,.
i'ö
~ :I: g ~ ~ g :11"% !I :u ~ (')"U. II l~i:1 I~; I I i lil~ PHR~Á ~
ri I z I ~~ I om-
~ i em! f§ , II,S~ ~".I ~.... æ.
m"U ~h ~:Q ~.. liar. i I in! _:::..... II
_.k
~~ f/) "-'"
~ í II=!! " îJ~iI
'":II" I
~~I .Iio PIl\ola Huria - ok __leo.po - r(
::t ! I -'11 -.;- .... . --..-,.- ;~¡¡
0 .üel ml "...--
õ I _._--
X z I ¡Ø~ -- ..., 11m-I-'" II
5--'1
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
George Golf Design
24-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 10, 2004 (Continued from 8/3/04)
August 24, 2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of George Golf Design, Inc. to conditionally rezone 115 acres from AG-3,
Agricultural to AR, Agricultural Residential and to obtain a Special Use Permit to
develop and operate a golf course on 362 acres, located at 3687 Pitzer Road,
Vinton Magisterial District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Janet Corcoran, 3852 Pitzer Road, spoke in favor of the golf course. Ms. Ona Early,
3387 Mount Pleasant Blvd. spoke on behalf of the Mt. Pleasant Civic League and
expressed the civic league's unanimous support of the golf course proposal. Ms.
Shelby Cundiff, 316 Chestnut Mountain Drive, expressed support of the golf course
proposal but stated concerns that there were so many unknown factors dealing with
future residential development. Ms. Elizabeth Abe, 6909 Mary B Place, expressed
concerns with wetlands and creeks on the property in addition to potential traffic on
Pitzer Road.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Ms. Janet Scheid presented the staff report. Mr. McNeil stated that he thought the
project should be presented as one package with the golf course proposal and the
residential development together. He expressed concern regarding future residential
density on the residual property. Ms. Hooker inquired as to the type of golf course the
petitioner proposed and plans for future residential development.
D.
CONDITIONS
Rezoning:
1. Residential density on tax maps #79.04-2-10, #79.04-2-10.1,
#79.04-2-10.2, #79.04-2-11 and #79.04-2-12 will be no
greater than 1 house per 3 acres (as currently allowed under
AG-3 zoning) unless a subsequent rezoning to Planned
Residential Development, per the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance, is approved.
SUP:
1. The chemicals used on the golf course shall minimize the
effect on ground water pollution.
2. The club house shall be constructed primarily of the
following exterior materials: stone, brick and wood.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. McNeil made the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning with conditions.
Motion carried 4-0.
Mr. McNeil made the motion to recommend approval of the SUP with conditions.
Motion carried 4-0.
6
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
(~ ,." -, ~7'
::;\....
7
'"',
~7
.;
Petitioner: George Golf Design, Inc.
Request: Rezone 115 acres from AG-3, Agricultural to AR, Agricultural Residential with condition and
obtain a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a golf course on 362 acres.
Location: 3687 Pitzer Road
Magisterial District: Vinton
Rezoning Proffer: 1. Residential density on tax maps #79.04-2-10, #79.04-2-10.1, #79.04-2-10.2, #79.04-2-11
and #79.04-2-12 will be no greater than 1 house per 3 acres (as currently allowed under AG-3 zoning) unless
a subsequent rezoning to Planned Residential Development, per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, is
approved.
Special Use Permit Conditions: 1. The chemicals used on the golf course shall minimize the effect on
ground water pollution. 2. The club house shall be constructed primarily of the following exterior
materials: stone, brick and wood.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request for a conditional rezoning from AG-3 to AR and a Special Use Permit for the purpose of
constructing and operating an 18-hole golf course. The golf course will occupy approximately 250 acres of
the larger 362 acre property. The proffered condition on the rezoning limits the residential density on the
AG-3 portion of the site to one house per 3 acres. The site is designated Rural Preserve in the 1998
Community Plan and the golf course proposal is compatible with that designation. Staff believes this is a
unique opportunity to preserve 250 acres of open space while providing recreational opportunities to
citizens and visitors.
1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
1. AG-3 zoning allows 1 house per 3 acres.
AR zoning allows 1 house per acre without public water and sewer.
AR zoning allows 1 house per 30,000 square feet (one acre equals 43,560 sq. ft.) with either
public water or public sewer.
AR zoning allows 1 house per 25,000 square feet with both public water and public sewer.
2. Golf course is allowed with approved Special Use Permit in AR zoning district.
3. VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required. In addition, VDOT approval is required
for pedestrian/golf cart crossing of Pitzer Road.
4. Site plan review will be required.
5. Well and septic permit approval is required by the Virginia Department of Health.
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backaround: The subject property is locally known as the Saul Farm and has been used for agricultural
production for many years. The property is divided by Pitzer Road. The portion of the property to the north
of Pitzer Road slopes towards the road. The property levels out near Horseshoe Branch where wetlands
can be found along the stream. On the far side of the stream the land slopes upward to the tree line. On
1
C;-7
this side of the road the property has been cleared and utilized for crops and pasture land. Thick vegetation
exists along the stream. The property is currently served by a farm road.
The portion of the property on the south side of the road slopes gently down from Pitzer Road and rises
steeply towards the rear property line. While the land is primarily pasture there are some groves of mature
trees. A brick silo and 3 barns are on this side of the property.
Surroundina Neiahborhood: The surrounding neighborhood consists of AG-3 and AR zoned properties.
Properties consist of either residential home sites or vacant land that is utilized for farming. To the west of
the proposed golf course is the Blue Ridge Parkway and rural residential properties ranging in size from 4-6
acres. To the west, directly across the Parkway is a rural residential property consisting of approximately 90
acres. To the south of the site are large acreage parcels some of which have homes on them and some
that do not. To the east of the site, further down Pitzer Road, are residential homes on 1-acre lots. To the
north of the proposed golf course are undeveloped properties consisting of mature woodlands.
3.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout: The conceptual plan provided by the petitioner shows the layout of the golf course covering
approximately 250 acres with the remaining 112 acres being reserved for future residential development.
The course will span both sides of Pitzer Road and utilize a pedestrian/golf cart crossing of the road. The
conceptual plan depicts the future residential development in three separate areas of the site: the northwest
corner, the southwest corner and the southeast corner on the east side of Saul Lane.
The proposal is for an 18-hole golf course, a club house and a maintenance facility. The type of golf course
- whether it will be a private equity golf course, a private membership golf course, or a public golf course-
has not been determined yet by the petitioner.
Buildina Desian and Architecture: The club house could range in size from 5,000 to 25,000 square feet
depending on the type of course built. For instance, a public daily fee course would call for a club house
towards the smaller end of the size}ange - it would likely have a small pro shop. a small snack bar, an
eating and gathering area and an outdoor pavilion area. On the other hand. a private course would
necessitate a club house towards the upper end of the size range. This type of club house would provide
member services such as locker rooms, shower facilities, golf bag storage areas and would have a more
complete dining facility. In either case, the club house would typically operate the same daily hours as the
golf course - in other words from daylight to dark. The food service facility would be primarily for patrons of
the golf course.
The design of the club house will be architecturally compatible with the rural nature of the proposed site and
the exterior will primarily be constructed of stone, brick and wood. It is the petitioner's intent that the club
house be an attractive attribute to the golf course and appear to belong on the site.
Golf cart storage will be indoors. This provides protection to the equipment, convenience to the customers
and improves site aesthetics.
As stated earlier the golf course is proposed to be constructed on both sides of Pitzer Road and a golf cart
crossing of Pitzer Road is shown on the conceptual plan. VDOT will review the request for this crossing and
determine necessary safety features. Petitioner has stated that typically those features include marked
pedestrian cross walks, caution signs and/or "slow golf cart crossing" signs.
2
Ç-7
The petitioner, a golf course architect, desires to retain some of the existing barns and silo on the property
and incorporate them into the site design and architecture of the new buildings. At this point in time, the
details of the site plan have not been finalized so it is not certain that this will occur.
A maintenance facility will be required for the operation of the golf course. This facility needs road access
and will have parking for approximately 15 employees. This building will range in size from 5,000 to 12,000
square feet and will be single story. It will consist of equipment storage, repair shop, storage of chemicals,
fertilizer and grass seed. Approximately 3 tractor trailers will off-load at this location per year. The design of
this facility will be integrated and blended into the site. The building facade will be appropriate for the rural
location.
Chemical Use on the Golf Course: The petitioner has stated that he will use primarily organic chemicals
and all chemicals will be within the guidelines of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A professional
golf course superintendent, experienced in chemical application, will manage the golf course maintenance
operation.
The petitioner will apply for and seek certification of the golf course from Audubon International. This is an
organization that works in cooperation with the U.S. Golf Association to designate golf courses as Audubon
Cooperative Sanctuaries. The organization is not affiliated with the National Audubon Society.
Project Phasina: the petitioner plans to begin construction of the golf course by the end of 2004 with an
anticipated opening date of spring to summer 2006.
AccesslTraffic: Access to this site will be from Pitzer Road, State Route 617. A minimum 24 foot paved
driveway will serve the club house area. Pitzer Road has a statutory speed limit of 55 mph in this location.
Upon review by the Roanoke County Traffic Engineer and the VDOT Assistant Resident Engineer it is
estimated that approximately 650-730 vehicle trips per day could be generated by the golf course alone.
(Note: these traffic projections are based on national averages and studies of municipal courses, private
country clubs and public courses with driving ranges, clubhouses, banquet facilities, etc. These projections
may be high and the type of course will determine the actual number of trips generated by the site). The
traffic projections do not take into consideration any future development of the 112 acres of residual
property. The most recent traffic count (year 2000) for this section of Pitzer Road (Route 617) is 600 vehicle
trips per day.
Approximately 100 parking spaces will be required at the club house per Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance. This parking lot or lots will be required to be paved and landscaped according to Roanoke
County ordinances.
Fire & Rescue/Utilities: This site is located within the 6-8 minute response time from Mt. Pleasant station.
No hydrants are available in this area.
Blue Ridae Parkway: The United States Department of Interior, National Park Service has stated that the
golf course will not be visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway and therefore they have no visual impact
concerns with the proposed golf course. They have also stated that they would like the opportunity to
review any proposed housing on this site to ensure that the scenic quality of this view area is not
compromised.
3
~-" 7
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The site is designated as Rural Preserve in the 1998 Community Plan. The golf course is consistent with
the Community Plan designation and will provide a rural, recreational facility.
Any future housing planned for the site will either be allowed by right or will require a rezoning action and
review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of Supervisors. As exists today and under
the proposed AR and conditional AG-3 zoning, approximately 84 houses could be built on the residual 112
acres, without public water or sewer service. That number of houses would increase to approximately 135
homes with public water and sewer service. The Community Plan encourages the clustering of homes in
Rural Preserve designations. If petitioner proposes a future rezoning to increase the residential density
allowed on the residual land, staff would encourage rezoning to a Planned Residential Development, thus
the language in the proffered condition limiting rezoning to Planned Residential Development. This would
provide the opportunity to utilize clustering, private roads and flexible lot configurations to preserve
important environmental and visual resources on this property.
5.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
This is a request to rezone approximately 115 acres of land from AG-3 to AR with a proffered condition
limiting the residential density to what is currently allowed under AG-3 and to obtain a Special Use Permit
on 362 acres to operate a golf course. The property is designated Rural Preserve in the 1998 Community
Plan and the proposed plan is consistent and compatible with the policies and guidelines of that
designation.
The proposal provides a unique opportunity to provide a recreational facility while preserving 250 acres of
open space.
DATE: August 5,2004
CASE NUMBER: 24.8/2004
HEARING DATES:
PREPARED BY: J. Scheid
PC: 8/10/04
BOS: 8/24/04
4
County of Roanoke
Conununity Development
Planning & Zoning
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108
For Staff Use Only
s-.~. -(
Case Number
ALL APPUCANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
0 Rezoning 121 Special Use 0 Variance
Applicants nameladdress w/zip Phone:
George Golf Design, Inc.
Lester George, President Work: 804-272-4700
609 Twinridgc Lane Cell #:
Richmond, VA 23235 Fax No.: 804-272-4771
Owner's n.ame/address wlzip Phone #: 540-312-7712
NBO Associates, c/o Ronald C. Brooks
4616 Phyllis Road, Roanoke, VA 24012 Fax No. #:
Prop~ Location Magisterial District Vinton
3687 Pitu;r Road
Ml Pleasant, VA Community Plamrlng area: Mt. Pleasant
Tax Map No.: Existing Zoning: AR, AG3
079.04..{)2-IO.OO-OOOO 079.04..{)2-11.00-O000
079.04-02-12.00.0000 079.0O-QI-OI.OO-OOOO
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 361.74 Existing Land Use: Rural Preserve
.' .
REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPUCANT$ (Risr
Proposed Zoning: NI A
Proposed Land Use: Golf Course wI Residual Parcels for Future Development
Does the parcel meet the m;n;mnm lot area., width, and frontage requirements of the requested district'? NA
Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the min;Tmlm criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes 0 No 0 NA
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0 NA
.,
VARIANCE APPLICANTS (J? .,
Variance ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning OrdiDance in order to:
Is the applic:anon complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR
INCOMPLETE.
RIS V RIS V RlS Y
~ Consultation ~ 8 112" x II" concept pIan ~ Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, ifapplicable
Justification Wa1rif and sewer application Adjoining propcr1y owners
1 hereby certify that 1 am either the owner of the property or the owner=s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know1edge and
consent of the owner. .
Owner's Signature
I.mS~CA1iON' ~R REZONING OR SPECIAL U~p,~ IŒQUEST,
Applicant
ç._- 7
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change
in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use
additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the
begimúng of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The FountainHead Golf Club will further the purpose of the Roanoke County Ordinance by meeting the creation ora
convenient, attractive and harmonious community and by facilitating the provision of adequate recreational areas within
Roanoke County.
Specific to the Rural Preserve classification, The FountainHead Golf Club will maintain a rural appearance and offer a rnnch-
needed recreational facility for people in the Roanoke area. It also enhances the county's economic development opportunities by
providing the premier golf facility in Southwest Virginia.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
The FountainHead Golf Oub meets and exceeds the requirements of Community Plan by preserving approximately 70% (guideline
requests 50%) of its property in open space.
The cours'e provides for an innovative yet unobtrusive addition to the community by preserving open space which creates habitat
and protects wildlife, eDhances environmental protection and limits future types of development
Please descn"be the impact( s) of the request on the property itse1f, the adjoining properties, and the sun-ounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The course will generate little to no impact to school systems while it will increase tax revenue to Roanoke County.
FountainHead will be served by Mt Pleasant Fire and Rescue station as it is cun-ently. Adjacent and nearby property
values will be enhanced with the introduction of an upscale golf community and the rural nature of the community will be
preserved. .
The golf course will be served by well and septic under this proposal and necessary permits will be obtained from the
health department The golf course will utilize integrated pest management practices to maintain the course and the
proposed lakes will serve as stonnwater best management practices. The impervious cover of the proj ect will be very low
and overall water quality of the receiving waters should be improved by removing cattle from streams and adjacent land.
Access to the property will occur via a commercial entrance along Pitzer Road.
I JUS'fJ!ICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
Applicant
The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2.2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance
can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, descn"be how the request meets each factor. If
additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
'~ ?-OAtllO,,¡,
I'¡O.,..LtI.;,o.JI.p<"
~~... -~ t..:,L
i""IPJ:-4Yt.~
,;2' "-"£içP:>;"".
?"~..!.!f- "t.;~
~....~--",~;: ;P£-
183i\
5-7
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennil
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance. the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all r~zoning. special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a
professional site planner. The level of detail may vary. depending on the nature of the request The County Planning Division
staff ma exe t some of the items or su est the addition of extra items, but the followin are considered ]TI;nimlllT\;
AIL APPLICANTS
~ a. Applicant name and name of development
EI b. Date, scale and north arrow
c.
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
EI d.
~ e.
EI f.
~ g.
h.
i
Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain. etc.
The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
All property lines and easements
All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions. floor area and heights
Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
Dimensions and locations of all driveways. parmg spaces and loading spaces
- j.
Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
~ k. Existing utilities (water. sewer. stonn drains) and connections at the site
~ 1.
A1:J.y driveways. entrances/exits. curb openings and crossovers
~ m.
~n.
~ o.
~p.
- q.
Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
A1:J.y proffered conditions at the si~ and how they are addressed
If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule
~
5'."'-7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,2004
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 115
ACRES (TAX MAP NOS. 79.04-2-10,10.1,10.2,11, AND 12) FROM AG-
3 TO AR, WITH CONDITIONS, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A GOLF
COURSE ON 362 ACRES (TAX MAP NOS. 79.04-2-10, 10.1, 10.2, 11,
12, AND 79.01-1-1) ALL LOCATED AT 3687 PITZER ROAD, VINTON
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF GEORGE
GOLF DESIGN, INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 2004, and the
second reading and public hearing were held August 24,2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on August 1O, 2004, having been continued from August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by
law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.
That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing
115 acres, as described herein, and located at 3687 Pitzer Road (Tax Map Numbers
79.04-2-10, 10.1, 10.2, 11, and 12) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural District, to the zoning classification of
AR, Agricultural Residential District, with conditions.
2.
That this action is taken upon the application of George Golf Design, Inc.
3.
That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby
accepts:
1
S.-- ~!
(1) Residential density on Tax Map Numbers 79.04-2-10, 10.1, 10.2,
11, and 12 will be no greater than one (1) house per three (3) acres (as currently
allowed under AG-3 zoning) unless a subsequent rezoning to Planned
Residential Development, per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, is
approved.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
115 acres being made up of Tax Map Nos. 79.04-2-10, 79.04-2-10.1, 79.04-2-
10.2, 79.04-2-11, and 79.04-2-12
5.
That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to George
Golf Design, Inc. to develop and operate a golf course on 362 acres (Tax Map Numbers
79.04-2-10,10.1,10.2,11,12, and 79.01-1-1) located at 3687 Pitzer Road in the Vinton
Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan
pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions:
(1) The chemicals used on the golf course shall minimize the effect on
ground water pollution.
(2) The club house shall be constructed primarily of the following
exterior materials: stone, brick, and wood.
6.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
?
.........
'"
,
Applicants name: George Golf Design, Inc.
Proposed Zoning: Special Use I AG:a-~ -roA.~
Existing Zoning: AR, AG3
Tax Map No Pt. 79.04-2-10,11.12,10.1,10.2
AND 79.00-1-1
~
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
\...
~
5-8
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Barry & Janet Fitzgerald
25-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 3, 2004
August 24,2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald to rezone 4.514 acres from 12
Industrial District to R1 Low Density Residential District in order to construct a single
family dwelling, located at 5132 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. John Murphy presented the staff report. Mr. Natt represented the petitioner. Ms.
Hooker asked if this was only for one house.
D.
CONDITIONS
None.
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Ms. Hooker made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the rezoning
request. Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
7
Petitioner:
STAFF REPORT
Barry M. & Janet B. Fitzgerald
~ ~
-)S
Location:
Magisterial District:
Request for a rezoning on a 4.514 acre portion of a 12.391 acre parcel from 1-2,
Industrial District, to R-1, Low Density Residential District, for the construction of a
single-family house for a family member.
5100 Block of Poor Mountain Road
Request:
Catawba
Proffered Conditions: None.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property is designated as Development in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The
rezoning is supported by the Community Plan.
1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Single family houses are permitted in the R-1 zoning district.
A subdivision plat would be required to be submitted, reviewed and approved in order allow for the
proposed subdivision of the subject lot.
VDOT approval for any entrances from a public road shall be required.
A building permit will be required to address all requirements for applicable building codes. The site is
located within a potential shrink - swell soils area and will require a geotechnical engineer to evaluate the
soils for building code compliance.
The existing use of the 1-2 zoned portion of the site is a Construction Yard. The Use and Design Standards
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance outline additional separation requirements. In the 1-2 district, all
materials stored on the premises overnight shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully
screened from surrounding views in accordance with Section 30-92, and then be setback at least 100 feet
from any adjoining residential district. Within this 100 foot buffer yard plantings and screen fencing will be
required on the industrial site.
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backqround -The subject property has been zoned industrial (manufacturing) even prior to the 1992
comprehensive rezoning of the county. The adjoining parcels were actually changes from M-2 to R-1 as a
part of the 1992 comprehensive county rezoning process.
TopoqraphvNeqetation -The site is heavily wooded with mature vegetation. The contractor's business is
barely visible from Poor Mountain Road due to the thick vegetation.
Surroundinq Neiqhborhood -The subject property is surrounded by railway right of way on the east and
west, Poor Mountain Road to the north. The immediate property to the south is zoned R-1 and the parcels
beyond the railway right of way are also zoned R-1.
1
s-~
3.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Access/Traffic Circulation - There is an existing access easement to the site crossing the Norfolk Southern
Railway right of way.
Fire & Rescue/Utilities -Fire and rescue services will continue as presently served. The site is shown to be
served by a private well and private septic system. A 24 inch main water line is on the opposite side of the
railway right of way. Private well and septic permits have been obtained for this site from the Roanoke
County Health Department.
Economic Development - The Roanoke County Department of Economic Development is not opposed to
this rezoning due to restricted access to the site.
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The subject parcel and surrounding parcels are all designated as Development in the 1998 Roanoke County
Community Plan. This is the future land use designation where most new neighborhood development will
occur, including large-scale planned developments and mix residential with retail and office uses. Typical
land uses that are encouraged include conventional residential and cluster residential.
5.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The proposed rezoning from Industrial to residential is supported by the Community Plan. The Department
of Economic Development is not opposed to this rezoning due to restricted access to the site. Staff is not
opposed to this request due to conformance with the Community Plan and the restricted access does not
support extensive industrial activity.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING DATES:
#25 - 8/2004
J. Murphy
PC: August 3, 2004
BOS:
August 24, 2004
2
t-:::"'" ~
,,'::;;"" (~
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
~ejvcd by:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2Q68 FAX (54ù) 776-7155
i{f#~iÆl~ifii!.r~' :'" ,", '"..":'
Check type of application filed (ch~k all that apply)
)t} Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Vmance
AppIiC2.lion fee;
PCffiZA date:
Placards issued:
BOS dale:
Case Number
'.."" ",-"""",,',""'.' """"""""""'....-.." """",'..
, .. '¡
,'",--" ,.'.. ,
0 Waiver
0 Administrative Appeal
Applicants name/address whip .
Barry M. & Janet B. Fitzgerald
4644 ~ Drive, Salem, VA 24153
. a:NTACT: Edward A. Natt 3912 EJectri c Road 2 0
Owner's namcfaddresŠ-wlzip
Barry M. & Janet.B. Fitzgerald
4644 G.mNood Drive, Salem, VA 24153
<INfÞCf: Edward A. Natt 3912 Ele
Property Location
5132 Poor Mounta in Road
Phone:
Work: 725-8180
Cell #:
Fax No.: ~72-0126
Phone #:
Work: . 725-8180
FVS.No. #~ 772-0126
Magisterial District:
-.,
Ca t aOOa
CcmmUDity Pl.amÜD.g area.:
, Catawba
Tv;: Map No.:
Part of 064.04-01-08 Existing ZoniDg: 1-2
Siu of parcel(s): Acr~: 4.514 I Existing !.aDd Use: vacant
;~i!l~!it.~~:~ii~ P$~' ,~~jj~i~~~~~}i~~~,~~~?m, ,.:., -~.:' :.- -~ ~'. ~.~, '.~,:.. -' ~,:,~::~ ~'~'-=~~:_.~'. ,::~~
Proposed Zoning: R-1
Proposed Land Use: S i fY::J I e- f am i I Y hare .
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirem.ents of thc rcquest~ district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?
IF NOt A VARIANCE IS RE Q'UIRED FIRST
Ifrezomng request, are conditions be1ng proffered with. this request? Yes No
""_'.""Y"'~"""'--"~"" .." """"",-""""-"",~"-"..~."..,...,..........,,...,,.,....__.,'-"-."-"'~"-_"'_"'.""..........,_.., ..,...-..".............., '.""",,'-"
:":~~~"ÎF.'W~RÅfyt.t.'ADMm1S~~ñW.nPËÄJ/bpti~:&m.~l" ,'" "." '., ',"" ""
-¡" .:.,.;t:':~.:..,::i~!:;'...;-..:.,,\ -..'.":':' :;""': "':"':.\,c.,.~.,."-,~=.::........-i';.:.:"l::::.~~::~;';';",~"~:~",,,,,~~,~~-,:;""r.~_..:.::1>'..~",.~.1.....,~:~,:~w".'.:.....::.,.~,;::~:,_:~;:....:...,--".u""":-'.,.':,:....,:,,-:,,
, . .
Yes
No
YarlancelWaiVCf of Section(s)
of the :R.oa.nõke County ZoDÏDg Ordina.nec in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
App~ of Jnterpretation of Scctíon(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THE
ITE!vIS ARE l\1ISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
Rlsrw V/AA RlS/W V/AA RIsrw V/AA
m Consulærlon ~ 8 112M X 11 M concept plan ~ Application f=
Application Metes aDd bounds description Proffers. if applicable
'Justification Water aDd sewer application X Adjoœg property owners
. I hereby certify !fat I am either the owner 0 th= property or the owner's agent or contra. and am a.cting .tb the knowledge a:
consent of the owner. CMNERS: fl,'jt (þIJ' -----
Ral"rvM. Fitzgeral Janet B. Fitzgerald
3-. 8
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant
Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald
Part of Tax Map No. 064-04-01-08
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as
well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The property is currently zoned as Industrial 2. However, the configuration of the property and its location
make it impractical for any additional industrial use. A major portion of the road frontage is located within
the 1 DO-year flood plain and there is already an existing use on the 1-2 property. The proposed rezoning
will allow for the subdivision of a minor portion of the property and the creation of one single-family
residence to the rear. The family subdivision cannot be used because of the zoning of the tract.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The general area where the home is to be located is all residential. The property owner would like to
subdivide the property and allow one of his children to construct a house on this parcel. The rezoning will
allow for an additional buffer between the residential property and the industrial use.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The rezoning of the property and the construction of a single-family home will have no impact on the
services provided by the County.
\\JOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONI NG\Filzgerald JUSTIFICATION .doc
S-;?
Address of Subject Property:
5132 Poor Mountain Road
Tax Map No.:
Part of 064.04-01-08
Applicant/Owner's Name:
Barry M. and Janet B. Fitzgerald
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of West River
Road CJa. Sec. Rt. 629) on the easterly line of the property of
the Norfolk Southern Railway (formerly N & W Railway/Old
Virginia Railway); thence with the line of West River Road S.
69° 35' 42" E. 68.38 feet to a point; thence with new lines to
the property of the Applicant and with a curved line to the right
having a chord, bearing and distance of S. 20° 17' 13" E.
381.89 feet, and a length of 382.41 feet to a point; thence S.
25° 26' 53" W. 326.65 feet to a point; thence S. 52° 05' 05" E.
646.68 feet to a point on the property of Norfolk Southern
Railway (formerly N & W Railway/Old Virginia Railway) right-
of-way; thence with the same S. 26° 50' 00" W. 230.00 feet to
a point on the northerly line of the property of Roger A. and
Shelia R. Harrison (Tax Map No. 64.04-01-09); thence with
the same N. 45° 13' 21" W. 716.24 feet to a point on the
easterly line of the property of Norfolk Southern Railway
(formerly N & W Railway/Old Virginia Railway) N. 25° 26' 53"
E. 448.06 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the left
having a chord, bearing and distance of N. 20° 10' 10" E.
372.16 feet, an arc distance of 372.69 feet to the point and
place of BEGINNING; and containing 4.514 acres.
\\JOll Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Rtzgerald LEGAl.doc
Page 1 of 1
c
.~"'K
....,J' '"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,2004
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A
4.514-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5132 POOR
MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 64.04-1-8) IN THE CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 12
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON
THE APPLICATION OF BARRY M. AND JANET B. FITZGERALD
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 2004, and the
second reading and public hearing were held August 24, 2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by
law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.
That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing
4.514 acres, as described herein, and located 5132 Poor Mountain Road (Tax Map
Number 64.04-1-8) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the
zoning classification of 12, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R1, Low
Density Residential District.
2.
That this action is taken upon the application of Barry M. and Janet B.
Fitzgerald.
3.
That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southerly line of West River Road (Va. Sec. Rt. 629)
on the easterly line of the property of the Norfolk Southern Railway; thence with
the line of West River Road S. 69° 35' 42" E. 68.38 feet to a point; thence with
1
~-)?
new lines to the property of the Applicant and with a curved line to the right
having a chord, bearing and distance of S. 200 17' 13" E. 381.89 feet, and a
length of 382.41 feet to a point; thence S. 250 26' 53" W. 326.65 feet to a point;
thence S. 520 05' 05" E. 646.68 feet to a point on the property of Norfolk
Southern Railway right-of-way; thence with the same S. 260 50' 00" W. 230.00
feet to a point on the northerly line of the property of Roger A. and Shelia R.
Harrison (Tax Map No. 64.04-1-9); thence with the same N. 450 13' 21" W.
716.24 feet to a point on the easterly line of the property of Norfolk Southern
Railway N. 250 26' 53" E. 448.06 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the
left having a chord, bearing and distance of N. 200 10' 10" E. 372.16 feet, an arc
distance of 372.69 feet to the point and place of Beginning, and containing 4.514
acres.
4.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
\
/
'\,/
c ~)
:)- ð
1.
f>R/
~
~
."-
èi
CJ::
~
r:
QJ
:S
:::;
)
1:1-.
5193
14.1
~
¿
'......
~ö
Applicants name: Barry M. &:- Janet B. Fitzgeral:l'
Proposed Zoning: Rezoning to R- 1
Existing Zoning: 1-2
Tax Map No Part OF 64.04- 1-8
~
,
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
'"'-
INST. NO. ------
LCŒND.
~¿- .~:N[ t
w/--
APPIIOX. - APPRO GIIA lE
-1- DO51IHG f'tNŒ
~ ...~
0 ,~ ,.r~ ~.
0 '"'-.. ""'~ ~
.. """"t ~) ~ -
.wIET 8. fmGERAIJ).OINEII DAlE! i¡::J ~~ ~, .. I~þ ~ \\
D.B. 1271. PG. 240 1l ~ ö ' ---7 ~" '~, 4t' [ ~...o f"'" S1'Œ -,
§ ~ !(! ~ ~~~~ ~~1 >:- '2. ~.....~
:I I'Ï¿':/ 1"0" i" 1
'/.b.. ... ~ ~-
¡¡¡- IS ~ ¡ tl t. ,}l:! ~ Ä-44111'œ" -
"', pi 'V ,Ii ,,1-...11 I
lit}"" '" ' L - 4ZU1' .¡. ""'"
I. if iI" ~;~f;1 '\ 01)-1 ~r4$'DO" L 41188' VICINITY UAP .., ="'"
~ ~K~r\' ~
~ i' '-:I ~ - -.¡; ~ .... ,...
J: / ... PIN'¡ (..~jr ~Ott ..... J .:v \ or.. '"
ðl' ø ~ /#, )0 \ '\ ŒlÐAl.IIO1E!II
A~~ @ ~ IS:=' J(' \ ~' 11.. 1. 'IllS PlAT WAS PIIIP.va II1HCIIT IIIIØIT (I A 1111.( IO'CIIT AlII 15
'e¡ .. ,,~ + \ 'f SlJ8.(CT 1HEJI[1O. 1NERO1." HJI[ lIAr EJIIS1" ÐlCllØAIIŒS 8Iat
0' ........ 1 ..... - "' ;A. ~ AFf[CJ H I'IIOPEJrIY IIOT - IØEIII.
'" ~ I ~ ,~ 2. lIE 5UIJ[CT PRII'ÐI1Y 15 ... 111[ LIllIS (I ZONE "7(' AlII °1<1." AS
~ - - ,4t. - 1J11II[ fÐIA f\ØD -- RA1E 11M' 110. 1i1.lama D.
L A IIOTARY PIØJC II AND fCR 111[ Cb- JlrACT :4 'J('Þ UfEC1N[ DAlE 0C1œD 111. 18111 HlII[1DIIIIIA1IIJI IS BASED IJI SAIl
AFIIIESAII STA1E 110 IEREIIY aJllFY '!HAT - II. f11ZŒIIAIJ) AMI .wIET 8. I .../ _...z...m7BY~.=r- "- r"ì' 11M' AMI lIAS IIOT IIEÐI \ØIfDI1T AC'NAL fÐJ MYA'UIS.
fTIZŒIIAU) - IIAIIES NIl. SIGNED TO 111[ F_- - HA~ . ~ ---""""" ~ ~ '-V J. PIlI lET IT .....15 15 1 lICIt DWIE1DI IT II IIICIÐ L.OIIO
_AlLY AI'P(AIIUI - 101: AMI AOI~ 111[ SollIE II lIT AFIII£SAII ~. /,¡,,!¡, .. i 1. ", ~ 4" 14" ,~ 111. --~ -- RIll - ~ IÐÐ -- 810IIII - A PI.ASTIC
.uaø:1IIJI IJI 1115 - DAY IE 2004. i!, ;- ~ 'I ~lic ,~ ~ .~ I: ~ \.. 'IEI!.œ CAI' IJI 111' - 'P. P- I'ROP. QIl" £IIIOSB. 1.,)-4
lIT CCiIIIISSCIII œRS< 1'" .¡: I b,."q;" ~ FIIOT II[1Al fDIŒ POST 15 D8\iE111U11[ COINER PIlI.
IIOTAII\' PIØJC ... ~ \ Y I:! COORDINA 7FS
ClllGINAL 12.391 N:.1RACT~ III1 IIß lIœ1JIti/l EIØIfl
IIIIGlNAI. TAX No. 1184.114-01-08 . /..... 1.'/1 1 5IIO.'UZ $1:11.47
1 ¡<;)¡ ~ I.. 11" or. 2 54:/0.n 4852.11
ROAM*[ aIOOY NO1D: ~~ ". '.<r "?; II~ ;I -,., lID4l.4.J
1 ~AI. IEJIE f' IT 111[ - aIOOY SWJMSIOII AGÐIT 15 fCR "" al '" 4 aua /4 4IJ! U7
PÌIIPosEs Œ ÐI5I.IRIIG CCIIPUANŒ 11114 111[ JIDAN(JI[ aIOOY SJIIÐM5IIJI r;.. - PI! ~ ð. TI Il.ltIl~ 1/ 6lJZZ,Ø/ 4lH7.74
OIIJI/WIŒ. PRlVAlE IlATI[II5, Slat AS c:oII'UANŒ _1IES1RIC1M I.V 01' FOUNO'il/" ~ '1",0 .... ' _7.411 4»11:J2
CO\ÐIAN1S (JI II1NEII 11M 1I(tIJR[II~ APPIJCAIIlL TO 111[ I'IIQP[IITY - YEl1DW lPPoIIS " {I¡"" 7 5fI31." ßJI.611
HEJ[IJI, IIIf. NOT II[';I[W[D (JI AI'PIIQ\ÐI 11114 1[- TO 1115 SIØJMSIIJI OR 1 ~;:, ~, ~^" ~ CAP, -:="'................ /.'1 ~ I / 1 IZlI.JJ - ! 7
RfSIØJM5ItII, 'ff ~t~ !f'¡" "'l Ir ,.............. " ð / I 1271." 4/11/0.47
2. 111[ ID fOOT GRA'«l.IIIWIMY 1IIIOUGIILOT (JI PARCD. AND 5ERWIG , oftl ~ .>4):....~ 4' ~ -- -:J ~ 10 1247.22 47:KM
~IIIG JIIIIIIÐnD 15 A PllVA1E IIIWIMY (E DUD IOQIlm PAGE 240). , 4.".... ..,. Ii ... II 82Ø0.4l -»
I"IS IIAII1ÐWiCE, INWJDIIG SIIOW IIDIOVAI. IS IIOT A PUaIC ~. ""( " " 12 ".41 411"'21
n 5tAI.l. MDT IE n-.r: FIJI N:;Cf I /IJIIX 1110 1M[ STA1E SECOIIIIAII'I smDI '- '~~ ~ ~. III t::\ ~)~ li'I:! 1 -» 1/1:11.47
~~~IEAS~~~C::- " ~ ~ ~ If// \.!Jlq¡ Cbo ¡l~
1IINISPORTA1IIJI fCR H ADDI1IIJI (I SUllQIIIIIJI S1RŒlS CURRENT AT 111[ , I' ;;J, Cb. i" 1.1 _02 4/lZZ.14
1IIIE 01' SUCH REWEST. AI« CO5lS REIllIIfJI1O CAlfS[ 'INS S1RŒT TO ~,.. (1// ry. 14 5!JH./JI _.71
Ø[CI] [ EUGIIIt£ FIJI ADDI11IJI 10 111[ STA1E smDI 5tAI.l. IE PRIMJED 11114 4t:t.l \:!.I .
fUNDS OlNER 1HAN 1HO!it ADIIII$1ERED BY IN[ IIIRGINIA DEPAR1IIÐIT IE 4.l: ~~I !o. ~ IIIJI PI! ~. PARl1Al SUR\€'( AND
lRAHSPORTAlIIJI. DCl"':\ -n::t<.. + ~ ]!~~~ '91 ~ FCUND 'II/ SUBDIVISION PLAT fOR
"\ ~ues 14' ~ '<>... ~I ~ "Æl.LOW lPPoIIS
API'IKI'otD: 'R lD t\\ \W~ ~~~ 4) /1 ,. CAP BARRY M. &; JANET B. FITZGERALD
E: .~ \ ~"~~-i"> '/ P110 .. 5HOIING H SI8OIVISIIJI IE A 12.:111 ACRE 1RACT
IIOAHQ([ aIOOY SUBOMSION AŒ111 DA1E '"\0 - '~4'~/ "II, 5ET '/,.å CREA11NC HEREIJI 'IRACT "A" (7.177 ACRE)
PRII'Ð!I'I Œ // a ANO 1RACT "II" (4.514 ACIIQ
ROCEI A. . HIlA LIWII!iIII // & J: Sl1\JAlE IJI POOR 1l0000AIN ROAD (VA. SEe. RT[. 112)
TAX. 1«1. 1114.CH-DI-IJ8 / ~~I .. AND lEST RMR ROM (VA. SEe. R1'[. 1311)
0.8. 1228. PG. 1117 -'IE
ÐRAtIÆ1Þ I CATA18A IIAGlS1EIIIAI. DISTRICT
~l1IJH I ROANOIC£ CCUN'IY. WlG8IIA
TAX , 14.04-01-08 seAl£: 1" - 100'
DIIA": oUI/P.II DA1E: .IJN[ 18. 2004
CAlC: P.II '1.0. 04-0271
N.B. .11-231 D.N. D4-027I-REV.DWG
~ TPP&ST....ma.-
~ ::::-.=:: ::. =-- .
"LANNPl8 - - -
-.........
..'!!
KNOW AIL IIÐI IT 1NtSE PRE'SÐITS TO .....
lNAT IlARIIY II. f11ZŒIIAIJ) AMI .wcr L nT2GÐIAID NIl. OWNERS IE 111[ 1RACT IE LAllI
SHOWN -(II COITAINING 11.381 ACRE$. IIOIJIIŒI) IY CORNERS 1 1IIIU 12 10 1 IICI.JJ5M. IIEINC
AIL IE 111[ I.AHO COM'/ED TO SAIl QIIIERS n IIIAHOI .. ASSOOAU 1IICQRPCIIA1Q), A
- COIIPORA1DI n DEID DAD AUGUST ~ 11117 AMI I[CQRO[D II lIE QØI('S 0ffU IE
1HE CllCUT aun IE IIOAHOIΠCOIJIITY" WlI:IIIA II DEID IlOl* 1271. PAGE 240.
IN[ SAIl OINERS HEREBY aJlTfY '!HAT MY HAW: S8IMŒD 1M[ PRa'ÐI'IY ~ -
-(II EJI1II[I. Y IE 1IÐR ( I f1IŒ taL AMI NÞ1IIO AS REIIIIIED n 5EC1IOIIS 15.2-2240
1IIIU 15.2-2271 IE 111[ 1~ CCIΠIE ~ AS A11END1111O DA1E AMI 111[ 10AH0C[ COIJNTY
SIJ8DMSIQII III_a; AS _OED TO DA1E.
IllNESS 1M[ 1IGIIA1IJI£S AMI SEAlS Œ 1N[ SAIl -
Ä-æ"lr"'"
.. 114116"
L- ~1.1"
011- S ",1IIa" E
31.1"
IWIRY II. mzÓÐIAID. DIllER
D.B. 1%11. PG. 240
OA1E
STA1E IE \'lIGNA
IE
L A IIOTARY PIØJC II AND FIJI 111[
AFIIIESAII STA1E 110 IEJIEI '/ aJI1fY '!HAT IIARI!Y II. f11ZŒIIAIJ) AMI .wIET 8.
f1T2ŒIIAIJ) - MAIIES ARE SIGNED TO IN[ fOREGI]8III - HAVE
PtJlSQlAIL Y AfI'EAREII - 101: AlII ~ 111[ SAIl[ II lIT AfOR[5AIO
.AJRI5DIC1IOII IJI 1115 - DAYlE :zGQ4..
lIT CQAIISSIOI mws:
IICITAII\' PIØJC
STAn: IE \'lIGNA
IE
tilT:
II 111[ a..ERII'S cmœ IE 111[ CIIQJIT aun Œ ROAHOC[ aIOOY. \IIICIIIA,
1115 IIAP .,AS P11C1)11QI 11114 111[ aJl1IIICA1E (I ACXNOM.£DGÐIÐIT 1NEJI[1O
ATTACHED ADIITTI1I1O RECORD AT -O'a.ocx -110 IJI'IIIS - DAY
Π2QO4.
ClD5m IY P.II. 1RACT "A" ANO "II" ON .AJHE IS. 21104.
GRAPHIC SCAU:
Re~\J L\!.\/
1m£:
S1t'ÆII A. 1IoÇRA.,
QDIIC
II'/',
0EPÜ1Y CI£III(
1011' SO' O' 100' 200'
P\."'..V.. "'- ' I" - 1110'
NEW 1.K5 16-13-14-4 ARE IA5EIIIJI A CURAÐIT FIElD
$UIMY. IlÐlAllINO PRQP[IIJY IS PLATTED fR(I R[CCROS.
IAIIIIY II. AlII .wIET 8. mzCEJUIJI
ARE 111[ _5 IE RECORD.
DEID QØC 1271. PACE 240.
P.8._-_.
PG._=
(/)
I
0()
5-9
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Star City Comics & Games
26-8/2004
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:
August 3,2004
August 24, 2004
A.
REQUEST
The petition of Star City Comics and Games to obtain a Special Use Permit to
operate a commercial indoor amusement facility located at 5728 Williamson Road,
Hollins Magisterial District.
B.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C.
SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Mr. David Holladay presented the staff report. Mr. McNeil asked about any food and
beverage service, and whether the business would have an ABC license. The
petitioner responded that a small snack bar may be included, but no ABC sales.
D.
CONDITIONS
1. Parking shall be provided at one space per three persons, based on maximum
building occupancy load.
2. The site shall be limited to one entrance from U.S. 11, Williamson Road
E.
COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Jarrell made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the special use
permit request. Motion carried 5-0.
F.
DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Concept Plan
- Staff Report
- Vicinity Map
- Other
Janet Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
8
~-~
Petitioner:
Star City Comics & Games
Request:
Special Use Permit for Commercial Indoor Amusement
Location:
5728 Williamson Road
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Suggested Conditions:
1. Parking shall be provided at one,space per three persons, based on
maximum building occupancy load.
2. The site shall be limited to one entrance from U.S. 11, Williamson
Road.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Star City Game Center wishes to move a growing business to a larger space. They plan to reuse
an existing retail building across the street from their current location. The card game play,
tournament play, and bingo are the aspects of their business expansion that require a Special Use
Permit. The other sales and office components are pennitted by right. The area is designated
Core in the 1998 Community Plan, and has adequate existing public services. With the
expansion to additional space, some additional parking may be necessary. Staff suggests
conditions addressing additional parking needs, and limiting access to one driveway to
Williamson Road.
1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Commercial Indoor Amusement is allowed by Special Use Pennit in the C2, General Commercial
District.
Interior renovations and upgrades shall comply with applicable building codes.
Site development review will be required if any additions are made to the parking areas.
Per Section 30-91-5 of the zoning ordinance, the site shall be limited to one entrance to the
arterial highway, u.S. 11, Williamson Road.
2.
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background - Star City Game Center operates at 5623 Williamson Road. Originally opened as a
comic book store, the business has grown to a combination of retail and mail order sales of
collectable card games. The center also provides space for card game play and manufacturer-
sanctioned tournaments. According to the petitioner Mr. Pete Hoefling, one such tournament is
open to children under age 15, and offers a $1,000 college scholarship prize to the winner. In
addition to the card game play, the center provides rental space for local charities to operate
fundraiser bingo games.
The current business location is approximately 5,500 square feet, with 3,100 square feet devoted
to retail sales and card playing, and 2,400 square feet for mail order sales inventory and office
space. The petitioner wishes to relocate in order to offer a larger card playing area for
tournaments. In addition, the mail order business has grown to the point of needing more space.
For additional details on the petitioner's business, please see the infonnation attached to their
special use pennit application.
I
s-,
TopographyN egetation - The property is flat and developed with a building and parking lot.
DaLong's Furniture has operated fÌ'om the site for a number of years, and is going out of
business. Areas to the west and north of the building are undeveloped, and being considered by
the petitioner for additional parking space.
Surrounding Neighborhood - All adjoining properties are zoned C2, General Commercial
District. A truck accessory business operates from property to the north. Land to the east across
Williamson Road is vacant. A small commercial/office park adjoins to the south. An
unimproved alley right of way adjoins to the west, and separates the property ITom residences
along Darby Road.
3.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture - Mr. Hoefling plans to move his business to a 24,000 square foot
building at 5728 Williamson Road. In the front portion of the building, approximately 9,000
square feet would be used by Star City Games for retail sales, card playing and manufacturer-
sanctioned tournaments, as well as rental space for local charities to operate fundraiser bingo
games. Leasing space for bingo would occur during weeknights, and would not conflict with
weekend card playing tournaments. Approximately 5,000 square feet would be used for mail
order sales. The remaining 10,000 square feet, in the rear portion of the building, would be
leased to other commercial tenants.
Access/Traffic Circulation - Approximately 24 parking spaces are provided along the south side
of the building. Some additional parallel parking spaces could possibly be delineated along the
edge of this parking lot, if sufficient space remained for a two-way travel aisle. During nonnal
business hours, the existing parking will be sufficient. But during some tournament events, the
parking needs would increase. In order to adequately serve the parking needs for tournaments
and bingo players, the petitioners wi1llikely need to construct additional parking around the
building. Zoning ordinance parking requirements for commercial indoor amusement are
calculated at 1 space per 3 persons, based on maximum building occupancy load. Staff suggests
a condition ofthe special use pennit to support this requirement.
If additional parking is constructed, access to the undeveloped rear and side of the property would
have to be via the travel aisle along the south ofthe building, or possibly through the front yard.
A second driveway entrance ftom u.S. 11, Williamson Road would not be allowed per Section
30-91-5 ofthe zoning ordinance. Staff suggests a condition supporting this requirement.
Fire & RescuelUtilities - Fire and rescue service will continue as currently provided from the
Hollins station. The building is served by public water and sanitary sewer.
4.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The property is designated Core commercial in Future Land Use Guide of the 1998 Roanoke
County Community Plan. The Core designation is for areas where high intensity urban
development is encouraged. The property is served by public water and sanitary sewer, and has
direct access to an urban arterial highway. The proposal confonns with the policies and
guidelines of the 1998 Community Plan.
2
C;-9
5.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
Star City Game Center wishes to move a growing business to a larger space. They plan to reuse
an existing retail building across the street from their current location. The card game play,
tournament play, and bingo are the aspects of their business expansion that require a Special Use
Permit. The other sales and office components are pennitted by right. The area is designated
Core in the 1998 Community Plan, and has adequate existing public services. With the
expansion to additional space, some additional parking may be necessary. Staff suggests
conditions addressing additional parking needs, and limiting access to one driveway to
Williamson Road.
CASE NUMBER:
PREP ARED BY:
HEARING
DATES:
26-08/2004
David Holladay
PC: 8/3/04
BOS: 8/24/04
3
--------
-----
C, _C1
.:;; I
.'
County of Roanoke
Community Developmént
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
Date received:
'¡"~" '~.m~~~ß'
,...'",.."......'......,,"..,
Applic:ation fee:
. b.oò
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
.". .".,."..
. . ' ,
.. . ..' .'" . .. -..., "" ",.. ... ..., -'.'...' .
"""'.",','"...-..'........."'.' ......"'"
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
0 Rewning )lí Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative App~
Applicants name/address w/zip P~Te.. ¡'¡OCF~m ci. P/?CjlOf£nr Phone: S"'fo. 767-Y2n
STAR C,TY CØ""CH G4nJl:.~ Work: S.,ð1'J1 ~
5"'2.3 WIII14""~on ROAD Cell #: S1. '-G~I'O .
ROAnD/(f!. VA. ~"Ø/1. Fax No.: 2.Ç5-o~t¡«
Owner's nameladdress wlzip DAvID u,. /."111 r!:$TJlT,-
f~n~ I'1.Lðn,
~9't. NVnT ".., Yo's CIA
!2fJ41I'14. VA ,,/11'
Phone #:
Work: 5&3-2633
Fax No. #:
Property Location
572..g W"II.ðrnSM Ro
RO~nfJ~,VA.1VO/~
Tax Map No.: 3lJ./o,,~ p /2., 1'1,/'1,-1-2,0
Magisterial District:' IIDIII~s
Community Planning area: /Iou ¡MS
Existing ZoDing: C - z..
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 2.23 Existing LaDd Use: R~7",ßit... 1- W~~.li.IJI/!t:. {4Cc~s"r.,
. --~;,:., :"'.', ~' ~.~r~ fWt. q$!f' r~tt#1J::iifiJ~ tf~~ni:g~~~:~!m ... ..~~-----,' .' .. ~,. ~. ~~ ~.- ~.,~:'~ ~~~-'._~-~ ~". L'_":'~"'
Propos~ Zoning: C -2. (^'O C þ.,fh't:.)
Propos~ Land Use: !?ETÛ,- .,. CD/'7 me.~C':.o~
Does the parcel m~et the min.imum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
((i;) No IF NOt A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? @ No
IF NO, A V ARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoIring request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No
:/ ~'~~';~'~:~:~j;;ji~~; ~:M?iijii.ii.jèiiiil._$jÊiÆijJ~.,,;~.:'"-~;.,!.::~~,;:'~:: .,.-.....":- - . "."~~,,'~=~~,, ~,:.:~~.
VariancelWaiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
~IA
Appeal of Zoning AdmiDistratOr's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Sectìon(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION W1LL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR JNCOMPLETE.
RISfW V/AA RlSIW V/AA RJSfW V/AA
m Consultation :i( 8 lIr x II" concept plan ~ Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description N :A Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application x: Adjoining property owners
. I hereby certify that I am either the owner of property or owner' agent or coDtract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and
coœent of the owner. Uø( .
~h\D~." ~î~~
CfJ1ITPAG-T p"rc.¡J.ð,ett..
....
s,-c¡
t.#.~;~~~~~rtON FOR IŒi()~q;..~.!:~~~~~~~!~~~::§~'!~~-~~~~:~',-_.-...:.---' -'.:'~-_.'.~".'..'-'..: .:.:..-.:.-:::...'
Applicant Pë. Tf:. f/()~r/.Jnj - ~T.t~ CITy COWlIC-!;'¡' G,¡fJmcs
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for
the change in terms of public health, safety. and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zonmg Ordimnce.
P/~" !'eL ATTAcuecl .:rn.f'oR.moTJ'r",
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County CommUDity
Plan.
PLe,tJre. See. ¡:JrrAcue r/. .rnrorfT»Tlö"
Please descn"be the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties. and the surrounding area, as well
as the ÎIDpacts on public services and facilities. includiDg water/sewer. roads, schools. parkslrecreation and fire and rescue.
PltðS-G Sell, /Jrr4c J(!~ .¡:,.rORm..oífö¡V
3
5-(.1
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Ph: 540.767.GAME (4263)
David R. Holladay
Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator
County of Roanoke
5204 Bernard Drive
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
June 25, 2004
Dear David,
On behalf of Star City Comics and Games Inc., please accept our attached application for a
Special Use Permit (SUP). Per our previous conversations and your subsequent
determination, we are requesting a SUP for a commercial indoor amusement land use at
5728 Williamson Road.. Four tax parcels are a part of this request. All are zoned C-2
Commercial.
Our letter to you dated June 16,2004 provided detailed information on the nature and scale
of our current and proposed business. I have attached a copy of this letter to our application
for the review of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. As requested on the
application, I have also provided detailed information on the relationship of our proposed
land use to the county zoning ordinance, community plan, and surrounding land uses. This
information is presented below.
1. Please explain how the request fùrthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance
(Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the bef!inning of the applicable zoning
district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed use will be located in a C-2 zoning district in an existing building now
being used as a retail furniture store and warehouse. This portion of Williamson Road is
developed with a wide variety of retail and business activities. Our request furthers the
purposes contained in Section 30-3 of the zoning ordinance in the following ways:
. Our proposed location is on a primary highway, and generates very little
weekday traffic. The traffic associated with our business will not occur
during weekday AM: and PM peak hours. Truck traffic associated with
our business will also be considerably less than that generated by the
furniture store.
'3-9
. Weare currently located on Williamson Road, and wish to remain in the
county. Our reuse of an existing building in a commercial area preserves
vacant and undeveloped land within the county, and will not require the
expansion of existing public services. Services cUlTently available to us at
our current location and available to the furniture store (police,
fire/rescue, utilities etc,) will be used by us at our new location.
. The employment we now provide, and the taxes we currently contribute,
will continue to benefit the county's economic development base.
The purpose of the C-2 district, as stated in Section 30-54.1 of the zoning ordinance is to
permit a wide variety of retail and service related activities. Our use of a parcel
currently zoned C-2 is consistent with this purpose.
. .
2. Please explain how the proiect conforms to the f!eneral guidelines and policies
contained in the RoanoTœ County CommunitY Plan.
The future land use map contained in the 1998 Community Plan designates this portion
of Williamson Road for "Core" development. High intensity urban development is
encouraged in Core areas, as are highway oriented commercial uses. Our proposed use
is consistent with recommended land use types and detenninants for Core areas.
3. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the prolJertv itself. the ad;oining
properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on vublic services and
facilities, including water/sewer. roads, schools. parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
Our intent is to reuse the existing building and the twenty-one space parking area on the
site. We do not envision any building expansions at this time. The interior of the
building will be upgraded to meet our business needs and to comply with any applicable
building code requirements. Tax parcel 38.10- 6- 20 is currently undeveloped, but could
be developed for additional parking if required to meet the future demands of our
customers. We will not have any outdoor storage of materials or products.
Our proposed use of this property will not have a negative land use impact on
Williamson Road or the surrounding area. Land uses along Williamson Road are
currently a mixture of high intensity retail, commercial service and office uses. Specific
uses in the area include a used car lot, a bowling alley, convenience stores, fast food
restaurants and a large flea market. Our site is adjacent to a small strip commercial
shopping and office center (to the south), and a truck accessory business (to the north).
Parcels across Williamson Road are zoned C-2 and are currently vacant. The rear of our
proposed site is adjacent to an unimproved right-of-way (alley) and R-l zoned
properties within the Boxley Hills Subdivision. A privacy fence and dense vegetation
currently screen the site from these R-l areas.
Finally, our proposed use will have no impact on public services such as schools and
parks and recreation. The site is currently served by public water and sewer, and is
S-Cf
located within existing police and fire and rescue service areas. Our proposed use will
not place unusually or heavy demands on these utility, or public safety services.
I hope this information has help to further clarify the nature of our request and its
confonnance with comprehensive plan guidelines and zoning ordinance requirements.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or need additional information as
a part of this request... I and/or my representatives will plan on attending the anticipated
August 3rd and 24th public hearings on this request
I can be contacted using the information listed below, and will do my best to answer any
questions which may arise.
Thank you for your assistance with these matters.
Pete Hoefling, Sr.
Star City Game Center
www.starcitygames.com
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd NW
Roanoke, VA 24012
ph:(540)767-GAME (4263)
fax:(540)265-0544 .
e-mail: outpostl@starcitvgames.com
s-,
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
Roanoke,Vkgûúa24012
Ph: 540.767.GAME (4263)
David R. Holladay
Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator
County of Roanoke
5204 Bernard Drive
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
June 16, 2004
Dear David,
As per on conversation, we are currently seeking to expand the Star City Game Center
from our existing location (a 5,500 sq. ft. building located at 5623 Williamson Rd. N.W.)
to a much larger location (a 24,000 sq. ft. building location at 5728 Williamson Rd. N.W.).
I am writing to:
a) Ensure that we will be able to move our existing business, in its entirety, to this
new property.
and
b) Find out if any specific permits will be required in order to do so.
What is the Star City Game Center?
The Star City Game Center is owned and operated by Star City Comics & Games, Inc., a
Roanoke, Virginia based corporation. Star City Comics & Games, Inc. is considered to be
a world leader in sales of Collectable Card Games (CCGs). Some examples of CCGs
include...
Pokemon (http://www.pokemon-tcg.com) - manufactured by Nintendo
Yu-Gi-Oh! (http://www.upperdeckentertainmentcom/yugioh/) - manufactured by Upper
Deck Entertainment
Marvel (http://www.up\,erdeckentertaimnentcomlmarvelJ) - manufactured by Upper Deck
Entertainment
s-cr
Magic: the Gathering (bttp://www.magicthegatherin~.com) - manufactured by Wizards of
the Coast, a subsidiary of Hasbro
Each of the aforementioned manufacturers has created multi-million dollar organized play
(OP) programs in order to drive sales of their games at the retail level.
What do we do?
The Star City Game Center generates approximately 90% of its income through mail order
sales of the aforementioned games. The remaining 10% is generated through retail sal es
and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments (as an accessory to those retail sales) at its
physical location. An example of one such tournament is the JSS (Junior Super Series)
qualifier; an event which we host 2-4 times per year. These qualifier tournaments are only
open to children under the age of fifteen years 9ld and award a $1,000 college scholarship
(provided by the game manufacturer) to the winner. The winner also qualifies for the JSS
Championship; an annual tournament which awards $100,000 in college scholarships
amongst its top finishers.
Why do we need more space?
Despite the fact that 90% of our revenue is derived from mail order sales, in-store
tournaments generally have to accommodate dozens to hundreds of players. This requires
plenty of seating, along with ample space for players to safely move about. Below, I have
provided a more detailed explanation.
Our current 5.500 sq. ft. location at 5623 Williamson Rd N.W.
3,100 sq. ft. (upstairs) - retail sales and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments
2,400 sq. ft. (downstairs) - mail order sales
Our new 24.000 sq. ft. location at 5728 Williamson Rd. N.W.
9,000 sq. ft. - retail sales and manufacturer-sanctioned tournaments
As we discussed, our current space is too small to accommodate many of the larger
events/tournaments that we have the opportunity to run. Although we still run many
smaller local events/tournaments at our existing locatio~ we are often forced to host the
larger events/tournaments in cities such as Greensboro, NC or Richmond, VA. This costs
us money, since many participants often purchase other merchandise while visiting our
Game Center. It also costs other local businesses money, particularly the numerous fast
food restaurants, pizza delivery businesses and "7-11" type convenient stores scattered
along Williamson Road.
Since the majority of our Collectable Card Game business is done on the weekends, having
this additional space will also allow us to set aside weeknights to accommodate bingo
s-~
activities, something we have been licensed to do for years. On these nights, we will
simply be leasing a portion of our space to local organizations/charities so that they have a
site nom which to run their fundraisers. The fundraisers themselves will be run entirely by
the licensed organizations/charities and our olÙy income will be generated nom renting
them a portion of our space in which to do so.
5,000 sq. ft. - mail order sales
As you saw, we have become quite cramped in our cun-ent warehouse/office and need the
increased space in order to accommodate our continued growth in this segment of our
business
10,000 sq. ft. - warehouse space for rent
This is an attached, but basically independent, warehouse at the back end of the building.
We plan on renting this space, preferably to a company that compliments our existing
business. Current prospects include authorized distributors (those who supply businesses
like ours with the games that we stock, but don't sell direct to the public) and smaller game
manufacturers. Nothing has yet been confirmed.
Additional information
Please let me know if you have any additional questions. I can be contacted using the
information listed below, and will do my best to answer any questions which may arise.
Thank: you for your assistance with these matters.
Best wishes,
Pete Hoefling
President, Star City Game Center
www.starcitygames.com
Star City Game Center
5623 Williamson Rd NW
Roanoke, VA 24012
ph:(540)767-GAME (4263)
fax:(540)265-0544
e-mail: outpost}@Starcitvgames.com
~~-\
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2004
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO STAR CITY
COMICS & GAMES TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL INDOOR
AMUSEMENT FACILITY TO BE lOCATED AT 5728 WilLIAMSON
ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 38.10-6-12, 18, 19, AND 20) HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Star City Comics and Games has filed a petition for a special use
permit to operate a commercial indoor amusement facility to be located at 5728
Williamson Road (Tax Map Nos. 38.10-6-12, 18, 19, and 20) in the Hollins Magisterial
District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
August 3, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on July 27, 2004; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 24, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.
That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Star City
Comics and Games to operate a commercial indoor amusement facility to be located at
5728 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with
the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of
the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is hereby approved
with the following conditions:
1
'3-9
(1 )
Parking shall be provided at one space per three persons, based
on maximum building occupancy load.
(2)
The site shall be limited to one entrance from U. S. 11, Williamson
Road.
2.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
5,-'1
Special Use Permit Application of
, Star City Comics and Games Inc.
Tax Parcel #'s: 38.10 - 6 ..12 ,
38.10 - 6 -18
38.10 - 6 - 19
38.10 - 6 - 20
..
June 25, 2004
t
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
,.
.
.
.
.
,
.
d
~
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~
'i
.
.
.
21.' .
57J~ I
1 Z7 At:. .
@ .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
19. -:á
....
18,. ~.
57211 Š
{/1
~
16. ,
.
.
17. .
.
.
.
,
15. ~
1.00 !<.c.
605
13... "
9
,
6Jf
::.I
~
-
-
7.
'"
QI
~
.
.
I
.
.
. :
.
.
.
!
i
.(
r
~ î~A'~~ .
.¡(A~ ~ ~¥í?/f .
. """ . . , /ÝÞ-"'
. s~l110l Pl~E 213
.';-4'
'1'BZS DEED made ~cl entered into this "~ day
of .sep~. 1978, by and bøtween W-ROLD '1'. LONG and
ELlZABm ~. LONG, hi~ wife, parties of the first part, and
DÃVID W. LONG, party of the¡f second part.
...
. .
.
WX'1'NESS&'1'H :
~--------:'-
"lHA'1' FOR AND IN CONSXDERA'l'ION of the sum of om;
HUNDRED TWENTY...FIVB THOUSAND DOLLARS ($125,000.00), çasb in
. . .
h-.nd paid by the". Party' of the seèond p~rt unto the parties of
. " .
the first Part,.th~ "receip.t of Which" is h~reb"y ~~oWled~~d,
the parties "of th-: first part do hereby"BARGAm, SELL; GRAN'l'
and CONVE~ with General Warranty. and Englisb Covenants of .
. .
..'
. ..
" '1'itl. unto the said party of the second put, David W. Long,
his heirs and assi9U~ forev~~, all of their right, title and
interest in ~e. following 10t8 or pårcels of la~d, with
" . ". .
. appurtenances thereto belonging, lying"and.being in the County
f
.of Roanoke, State of Virginia, ~nd more particularly "described
a. follow.~ to-viti
.~ARCEL I
BEGINNXNG at. point On the westerly stde of
Williamson Road (U. S. Route No. 11) 305.0"
feet northerly as measured a~ong the westerly
side of Williamson Roa~ fram the westerly side
of Wil1iamso~ Road and th~ northerly sido of
Abney Road, both extended, thence leaving
Williamson Road and with the northerly line of .
the prop~rty conveyed to R. W. Bowers Construction
Corporation in Deed Book" 742, P8:c¡e 424, s. 79. ""
29' 30. W. 250.0 feet to an iron,. the~\ce N. 11.
58 LIZ' W. 125.0 feet to an iron, thence N. 79."
29' 30. E. 250~O feet to an iron on ~he westerly
side of Williamson Road, thence with the
westerly 8ida of Wi¡liamson Road,. s. 11-
58 1/2' E. 125.0 fe~t to the place of
BEGIHN~G, and, "
AIIftI1f8 IlL -~
...w-. &, .... .
-..- ""-
. coH'1'ÁDfING 0.71 acre. and being more ..
particularly shown on a" plat of survey made
þy If. P.Parker, S.C.E., October 27, 1965,
atUchec! m and made a part hereo!, and
~ .. 8ant'a
.- .w SA"
......... ~
I'
,
i
110"") . ';>1 a
3n:)~ - f'\~:..., 'i
c- C'"
~-" 1
- 2 -
. .
BEmG the same proþèrty Q..:.2veyed. to Harold
T" Long and David w. Lo21q frozit G:reenland
D$velopment. corporation, Valley Lumber, .
Corporation ~ c. . !". ~efaUver and Irene C.
Xefatr.ier, his wife, by deed da~ed October .28,
19.65, of re~ord in the Clerk's Office of the
Cir~:i.t Court;, fo~ the County o.f Roanoke,
Virginia, in need Boqk 788, page S14.
PARCEL II
B!Ø¡mr~G at an ito~ åtp~.' ,o~thwest corner
of the Hùold T. t.ong and David W. Lonq,
property, being 'also corner to R. W. Bowers
Cons~c:tJ.O1\ Corp. property, ~~c:e wit;.h the .
north line of Bo~rs property S.798 29' .0.
tf. 190.05' to an iron, thence with the east.
side of a strip reserved for widening the
alley as shown on map N. 58,40' W. 88.40.ft.
to a point' thenc:e with the original east
line of the ålley N..9. 18' w. 36.86 ft.,to
a point, thence with a new d~vision line'
throug~ the property of C.' F. Kefauver, et
als, N. '98 29' 30-,£, .17$.61 ft. to an
. ,iron at the. northwest corner of the Long
property, tÞenc:e with the west 1,ine of the.
Long p:,ope~ý S. 118 58' 30- E. 125.0 ft.
to the BEGINNING and containing 0.52 ac:res
and be1:ng as shown Oft the map made by T. P.
Parker, C. E., dated January 15,1968,
attached to and ~de a part hereof. and
. ,
BEING the same property conveyecl to Harold
T. tong' and Davi4 W~ Long, from Valley ,x,UJnber
'Corporation, C.. t. Kefauver and Irenc:e c.
. Kefauver, his wife; and Greenland Develo~ent,
corporation, . by deed dated January 24, :.968,
of reeòrd in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, in Dee4 Book 854, page 1.
P ARCEt II I
BEGDlNINÿ at a pOint on the west ai-de of
Williamson Ro~d being the north~ast;.erly
corner of an 0.71 acre trac:t owned by.~arold
T. and DAvi~ W. Lon9, thenc:e with a line
~etween the LOng and C. F. Kefauver, et als
prop~rties, S. 79-:;t9;'30 w. .U8~U to-, a point
on an alley, th.nc:e with the line of the
alley and the c. P. Kefauver property N.
9-18 W. 13.14' to a point, ~hence with
alley S. 80. 42' W. 65.10 ft. to a pøint
on the rear line of Lot 3, BIQCk 12, Boxley
. Hills, thence with the line of Lot 3 and the
C. F. Jt.efauver property H. 168 48' W. .
45.. 75 ft. to a point, thence, leaving LOt .3,
with a new line., throuqh ~he C. F. Kefauver,
et als property ø. 79° 29' 3Q-,.E.'U6.89 ft., .
. I
]
]
,J'
[
~
I
~',
,[
"""M""""
S-1
- ;~-
, : ", 11':,) :"-: ')1~
. - . '- 'J
~ ù ~C1~t o~ ~he west side of Williamson
Rcaå. thence'~ith Williamson Road S. 11°
sa' 30" E. 60.0 !to to the 5EGniNING and.
co~t3ini~g 0.67 a~r~~ ~nd beinq a$ shown'on ,
'n3p Þr T. P. P~rker. S.Ç.E.. dated January 15.
~96!. revised April 21,,1970, attached hereto:
a~ë, "
ë::I~G the same' pro;;ert:t çonveyed to"Harold T.
, ~~~ç and'D3vid W. Long ftom C. F. Kefauver and
!renc~ C. Xe~auver, busband and wife. Valley
~~ber Cor?oratio~ an4 Greenland Development
Corpor3tion, by deed dated April 24. 197G, of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Co~rt fer the County of Roanoke,. virginia, in
~eed Book 897, p~ge 20. ' '
TO- nAVE AND TQ HOLD unto the' party of the second
:;,U':. D.1\'id W. Lo:lg, his heirs and assiqns forever.
Thj,:¡ deed is made 's1.1bjeet: to all e3:5ement~,
rc¡;tri.::t.io~.. <lnd conditions of record affect,Lng the tLtle
:~ :~~ prop6rty herein conveyed.
IU~ESS, the following siqnat1.1rœs and soals:
'-7l ¡./; J.. ~<f'
~. lenci,
(SEAL)
-. ' ,
: ' ~'l,¿,~~{~,';r::
£- . Z ,.t..T. Lonq '. " í.
, (SEAL)
~7AT~'OF VIRGINIA
-: 11',', Of' RbA.~lORE" To-wit:
,T~e fore~oinq ic~trum~nt was acknowl~dged before me
~;~p; ,S"':'~<1'iof E'epta¡1lbèr. 1978, by Harold T, r.o~9 and
E¡i:~~c:~ T. Locq, his wife.
~J ~OMmissio~ expires
..
, 0 £.c¿ ,d~ ,,'IRe)
" ,"J
$I:¡;r~I"~-'M"'~""" '.i¿~-rL~'
~ \""tJ >1 0 ~,.. ",t.c,.~ the Fift...t rO'MJor thl! O'oIlfItf of ~o.ll'1Ol!~. v.'). fhlS
: Ic..~ ' ~~#. _1.7/f"1~,...r."r","'n:"'5r':I('~"C".1'1cf
1,-- - ","'_""'...~~,:.-.....",.. '". '..., ..,'.:'.: .'.,.,.
,,~;. ....', , (".1, ~,u..' .' ., .
'T~"" " -,',". ...,o.,!..":;
ill~ ..~ ' 0 ~:: ':' '-')'~ Jt../~ '
. ..'..'.,,- ,;" t!;;~-.èu-"'- -..I.~'rl---:-_(.:.,r,
. -.. ,c.£o~~'! ~~c- ,"'1' ',~...
.""""','.r..,
. ',.
..
i
.
"
00
, .....c
',~, 7
L"
,~"
"l
, '0 ..
.....c
.....
'III:
8
""
.
,'~ni""";"4 c.,- I(rl'-,.~r r"-I'~¡
,.~- 1'.'...
ol'~ .,
~ ~
iii'"
~ ~'
~.
..
~
~,
00 ' II
IV". 'J.:!J Ir."
-S79'Z?~4ð"'" .
IJ.S 2 ' ,q~n:S
R:W". Dr wl!rs .
t;.,.s¡'. C'.'p-
ø.44 A-,
N 79 '-Z 1:.3 o' e:
49G.89'
Q o,tP7 .q~re
~
-.",.".,a
"'II ..- I!",e,
~ \ ) ~I
,... -..
~ ;!..I
~,~,
,..' 0" k'B.~t'.1'l' :,
~ \ ", "$.~.' .~,~ ~ ""1"O:Z9'.
'~\ .~~,.. 1Ie..",I,~CI "'~.('I'
. , ..
'-" ."'fi
-":'\' " ~ Ita
~ ." 'to
I ~ ... ;Jo1. '" ,
, \'~ -i',
, ~ ~ ~ ,~.
"~",.lto (Q;
4" "+v,~
,. ""'Vt, ~
IQ, -" ~I'~ ~ .
~-- ~, j
. ,\i'" ~ ~ ¡',.
N ,~,.
." ~o .~ ~ ,
"', l.
5' ('1 Q;.::e'..,
~' 0 ~~ I. fI'I
~ ' \ ...'~
'~ ~ ,'tIi'
~ ~.. ~"O~'
, , :1111""'" ....
--- '... '1\ i¡
.... ..' \1'
. .. '"
, " ~~'
, 0 '\
..\. .~ '~Il --
c". '0"" " --.sI'1fz,~",,-,,/
. ' , ' .. ,"\ 4...,/:",,' ~ '-it"",
~: I "~',,'I'... ('.'"
, ",~", r
- ~ ~ 0
, '~, ~
'\ .... ...
., I.\I~
\, ,'~'
".",
42,8,&,0 -S7':2.'1:'3¡;l"W
ZSð.ø
~~,
~~
~ "I
: Q( \
.,~I
~-.:
~~
~~
...,
~I
'~I
I, '.'
, 'rø;Cf'r7"
8.,.,1,' r. L.".3,1 Dflv,¡1 Hl.l.u '
"'.7/ .A~l'= ..'
0 '0
, r.
.' i~
Q .
, '" ~
'. ~.~
... ~,
-"
!:~
\It
'I,
, ,
.'
r !:o,O'
1,Ii!~W'8'~.~¿~.k ~';f'
O.'l.ø ,t:J<. ,
. '
.
. -fU.eVEY
FOR "
to'.
.
C. .' F. K'EFRUVE¡;Z, e,l ~4
OF, o,.sZ 'Ae.e¿; r.e.f'u:r.
TO B:E ÇOAlYE Y~D , TO . .
H~ROlD 1."/.ÒN6-" DAviD W. lÒMtS
ðEING ,A PoeT/oN 'OF SI.I)C~ 13
A4Ap' op", 8DXL..t!Y H.I¿,l, ... P:ð.s".Z70
. " ~ORNðlt:!!! COv.VTY; yn. '
" '..::s-cø/e: rea' ,O~ JQI'I.. /5- J!Jt:.
e~"."s ~,: Ap"" ~ l'lttl " C "¡,'Fi~J' t::."tJ~¡;
, 1).(,7 Ac. 11;I~,t ¿u!¿(N.. .. 81".:7 . Po P.~.t;,'J
sl..l'e c eo,../' ~r.",1'.
"
.'~-'-M' 0 ','-:"':.~., "--';0; '-
'.
-..-----.. 0
l/)
j
-0
.'
!
.
. .
--~
--...,. .........
,---------
',. --
--
County of R\. .oke
Long Property, 5728 Williamson Road
f)f':n~rtmellt of COlmnunitv Development
July 12, 2004
N,
u)
i
-0
15.
605
Rt.1B44
5.
626
624 -
6.
5626
~\tð. ~
~
1. <:c?n C2
630
3.
;0
co+-
...
....
I
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Applicants name: Star City Comics
Proposed Zoning: Special Use
Existing Zoning: C-2
Tax Map No 38.10-6-12,18,19,20
&- Cames