Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/8/2020 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-1 DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REGULATION OF (1) SHORT-TERM RENTAL PROPERTIES AND (2) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION YARDS FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS WHEREAS, § 30-14 of the Roanoke County Code provides that amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance may be initiated by resolution of the Board; and WHEREAS, during the past year, two issues have been raised to Roanoke County staff that the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance currently does not address adequately, namely the regulation of (1) short-term rental properties and (2) temporary construction yards for public infrastructure projects; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice require consideration of amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the regulation of (1) short-term rental properties and (2) temporary construction yards for public infrastructure projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. That it directs the Planning Commission to review and make recommendations on the regulation of (1) short-term rental properties and (2) temporary construction yards for public infrastructure projects. Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None TESTE: Deborah C. Jadcs�/ Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning Rachel Lower, Senior Assistant County Attorney Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-2 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 1815, LA MARRE DRIVE; HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0011-080-F05, the Route 11 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0011-080-F05; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Mahoney and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A CIO Y TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks' i Chief Deputy Clerk t6 *e Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County of Roanoke ............................................................................................................ By resolution of the governing bq F'gdopted September 8, 2020 The following VDOT Form "-4.3 is hereby attached and i ated as part of t)Ne gaWming body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County O icial Report of Changes in the Secondary System of S e Highways ftlect/Subdivislon 0011 -080 -FOS CS02 Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: =41...,, _ 1,: Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 La NarreDrive. state Route Number 1815 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .42 mi NE of Int of Rtes 11 81863 To: .06 mi S along Rte 1815 to tie-in point, a distance of 0.06 miles. VDOT Forth AM4.3 (4/20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Project/Subdiyision 0011-080-F05 C502 Type ChaM to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The fblkyMng additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested, the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 033.2-705, ❑33.2-334 La Nacre Drive, State Route Number 1815 Old Route Number: 0 --------------------------------------------- e From: .44 mi NE of Int of Rtes 11 & 1863 To: .07 mi S along Rte 1815 to tie in point, a distance of.. 0.07 miles. Recordation Reference: NIA Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Fonn AM4.3 (4/20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 0) N C �O Q C 00 U O.E O) �yd W ja�iOv ETC � oya V; O � N (n �'� O Ln m a cna�m CUNO c O U E o o> L -0 0= a, OO a cu 22 CL-0 E o z E:p LO.0 N C-Ecaoac a � Ocu oute1815 � Q m 0 Q U N tea- OmoONC C LQE a0 m a � O omomoo cu 0 cn rn m om 2c0"00 C-0 JW o C Q-0 (O U V7 � � C N N� O O CU a) i50' N CU � E N3 �c-O'er m� E E p° @ v L, 7 :5.(r0 U E- 22 N f6 Z N � Co +r U f6 'a N a) ¢� _CN NCO Cn fn LN ,r C EL C4? �� a U-0 0 � 0 0 0 VO O CO N LL N U N E E °' m� irk --Immm6kC), *k o m a I I �° O cu 0 0- 04 o 0 0 cu �o J O O O N 0 N C C O O C J N � O p N M CO M M � C C.0 C N 000 000 �p U r N � N Q � � N 0 0 f6 N E N O No0 N00 � 0 O O o 0 12 O � C C C C C - CO O O O � O � Z Z Z U Z m b rt � �v 04 'D �o j. 0 0 0 0 0 0 a, >% � O � O � O LL H LL H LL H m E o 0 0 � m m U m c o � a� LL O C v U) 1a6 3 W tie 0 W = LO LO }, O U) Z E o Q U a � � � Q m 0 Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-3 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 636, GLADE CREEK ROAD; VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0636-080-282, the Route 636 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0636-080-282; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A eOF?Y TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County of Roanoke ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- By resolution of the governing body do ed September 8, 2020 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and Inco rat d as part of the ing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. ! /,,g7 A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Stati Highways ftiect/Subdivision 0636-080-282 C501 Type Change to the Secondary System of State H jghways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Abandonment, VDOT Project Related Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-912 Street Name and/or Route Number Glade Creek Road, State Route Number 636 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- From: .12 mi NE Int Rt 636 & Rt 703 (B) To: .23 mi NE Int Rt 636 & Rt 703 (C), a distance of: 0.11 miles. VDOT Form AM -4.3(420/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page I of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.2-705, X33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Glade Creek Road, State Route Number 636 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- e From: .12 mi NE Int Rt 636 & Rt 703 (B) To: .22 mi NE Int Rt 636 & Rt 703 (C), a distance of: 0.10 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4 20 2007) Maintenance DiN inion Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 N� 3 v � 0 o c ro ��y o Q s ����o LO E U Co fir♦ / ���p 1 2 O.C� C9 (n O N mo CD 15 04 Za CD m Dip a) Z C O 6.r - U y O 0 N c �N > U'+--. ON 0 1 CD O 00 CCC i Or � � U C otS C oc00�+in UN>ir- M O 00 00 OM OC (.6C a c O a UQ QE caa n WW Wcp w>1 a 0 M a co m �a O�O0 U c N UC co N O U@ (n�+C 2f000a NM NN NO m J NN fnC Q O a 0 Om � O 00 O O— C` pON� � O LL H � O LL � � O LL H � O W H ❑W Z . 15 U O L, EE -C p N N < .� U V -O E+� � Q m m f6 f6 0 c° L 3 O N C CD(mcu ONO fn U) O (C60 /1 L.L c Cn C� a� c o 0 0� LL U a �- -a U O � Q N � Q fC '^t Cfl ) N o Q o M c c: E a) Cfl E U w c1— to m co U � 0 tf O N � O m 0 CL O O O O C N (6 L ~ fn O M Cr) CO M CO O 00 00 M O O N C O co N C � a «S � � � � o2S N O O fE M MM MM O O O M tf c(n N � O O O _U � CO CD 0 0 L N Cp '� C t :3 7 M CD I'- O NCO i Y cn 0 Z m O 2 AANkit Q r � M O O W W O _ �. LJ O 00 00 Or � � C otS M O 00 00 OM cpW WW WW Wcp NZ ZZ ZZ ZO ON NM NN NO � rN �N N C � O 00 00 O— � O LL H � O LL � � O LL H � O W H � Q m m U c o c c o a� c c o U a �- -a U Q N � Q fC o Q o AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-4 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 613, MERRIMAN ROAD; ROUTE 907, RANCHCREST DRIVE; CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0613-080-226, the Route 613 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0613-080-226; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A CORY TESTE: Deborah C. Jade � / Chief Deputy Clerk a Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing bodyAopted September 8, 2020 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and in ted as part of the g�rning body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. _ A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Tyoe Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: Street Name and/or Route Number Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 Merriman Road, State Route Number 613 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- a From: New Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (F) To: .09 mi. E to Int of Rte 613 & Rte 1667 (D), a distance of: 0.09 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Merriman Road, State Route Number 613 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (F) To: .01 Mi. N of Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (G), a distance of: 0.01 miles. Ranchcrest Drive, State Route Number 907 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Int of Rte 907 & Rte 1682 (B) To: .09 mi. E to New Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (F), a distance of. 0.09 miles. VDOT Form AM4.3 (4'202007( Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways ftlect/Subdivision 0613-080-226 C501 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.2-705, !33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Ranchcrest Drive, State Route Number 907 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Int. of Rte 907 and Rte 1682 (B) To: .08 Mi. E to New Int of Rte 907 & Rte 613 (C), a distance of: 0.08 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Merriman Road, State Route Number 613 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- 0 From: New Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (C) To: .01 Mi. N of Int of Rte 613 & Rte 907 (G), a distance of: 0.03 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Merriman Road, State Route Number 613 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int. of Rte 907 & 613 (C) To: .08 mi. E of Int. of Rte 613 & Rte 1667 (D), a distance of. 0.08 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDQT Form AM -4.3 (;'20'2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 o� N c %c1) ? VI0. r V UW , Ro64 E morn U cn 0(D a v, C,3) a) Cfl m m am OLN O V)V O L M z C q U 'p 'p ��a) L 0p `1V O O> OST O EC O U) m NN a�� 0 0 �.o OC)w E cc °mm�� E ..Ec U U N j•� �C (� O c 70 UQ dEmp �O a N O_ O O_ C 'p C O T— pa fO VO( O vCo � U) C N Q 'O OO OOL) 1p J O N a)m cu zm L) Z �E OOt� �p 6 f6 y7 =,A? D N N Q N2 '� O c O N 0)O �+' �O (n U)C2 O � Q� �LN0 Ci 0 mN �1 U) Cl U-0 LL O p O _U O M ,;� -;� 2w UCO aD ��. 0 cn C m M °II O L oC) 0 o7 O- O O N / O '( N p� O c ON �� rpOD c co J� E p O O 2' CL OJ�e .0 0) > v ~� 2 O rn a� 0 r kit LL 0 cu w �o �� U) "r0 .p J N coO coO O O � Cl)O O O O O O O O O O Cl) � � O U C7 �p � I� O O O O r O CO � O O) oiS � � � °� otS atS �tS � N � _M _M V M_ �M _MM CO QO r- (D Cl) N O O CO N� O N � _0 O N O N CO ~O � � � � � OC) C M Q' � �' M �' o�j •� rno�3�� �o�o �o�o m °dc°�o wom��c —�Zm r�Z�—M— —�— N � W � � � W �' � CO � d' O � O mW O W —W �nW �W v�W Z �Z O O O N O O �_ EM E C E� E C E� c E O � O � O 0 � O 0- 04 � O � O C O C O Z O C Z O C O Z O Z O L LL LLL• L LL O L LL O L L L �..L O �..L O w r � r w r � r w r w r � m U D W D w C9 (� E o 0 0 0 o a o 0 a°i Q m U m w D U w U) c 0 c c c O � U C C N N .0 C N =o -o a -o a o U -°a U Q m Q Q � � m Q 0 Q Q 0 Q O O O r O r r r r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-5 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 668, YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD; ROUTE 667, MAYLAND ROAD; ROUTE 915, COX HOPKINS ROAD; VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0668-080-229, the Route 668 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0668-080-229; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM- 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None Chief Deputy Clerk cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation Xs In the County of ----------------------------------------------------------- By resolution of the governing body a The following VDOT Form"4.3 is hereby attached and changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County ------------------------------------------- 3eptember 8, 2020 part of the govepgng body's resolution for Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Type Change to the Secondary System of State HoghwMt&L Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Abandonment, VDOT Project Related Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-912 Street Name and/or Route Number Hillside Road (private road entrance), State Route Number 668 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: 0.01 mi E New Int of Rtes 668 & 915 To: 0.02 mi N to tie-in point along Hillside Rd, a distance of: 0.02 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Int of Rtes 220 & 668 To: 0.16 mi. E to New Int of Rtes 668 & 915, a distance of. 0.16 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Mayland Road, State Route Number 667 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Oid Int of Rtes 668 & 667 To: 0.09 mi S to tie-in point along Rte 667, a distance of: 0.09 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rtes 668 & 915 To: 0.74 mi E to Old Int of Rtes 668 & 667, a distance of: 0.74 miles. VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4120/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Street Name and/or Route Number Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Old Int of Rtes 668 & 915 To: 0.06 mi N along Rte 915 to tie-in point, a distance of: 0.06 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number 4 Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Old Int of Rtes 668 & 667 To: 0.09 mi E to be in point along Rte 668, a distance of: 0.09 miles. VDOT Fonn AM -4.3 (4 20 2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 4 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways 12 =7 4TIZU71 Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: L_33.2-705, X33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rtes 668 & 667 To: 0.09 mi E to tie-in point along Rte 668, a distance of: 0.09 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Mayland Road, State Route Number 667 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rtes 668 & 667 To: 0.08 mi S to tie-in point along Rte 667, a distance of: 0.08 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Yellow Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- e From: New Int of Rtes 668 & 915 To: 0.71 mi E to New Int od Rtes 668 & 667, a distance of: 0.71 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Cox Hopkins Road, State Route Number 915 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rtes 668 & 915 To: 0.10 mi N along Rte 915 to tie-in point, a distance of: 0.10 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 'DOT Fonn AM -43 (4!20'2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 3 of 4 'lug- =. it= =. t -. •, i. .t771=1 7741, Yelknw Mountain Road, State Route Number 668 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: Int of Rtes 220 & 668 To: 0.15 mi E to New Int of Rtes 668 & 915, a distance of: 0.15 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Cox Hopkins Rd, State Route Number 915 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: New Int of Rte 915 & Hillside Road To: 0.03 mi E to tie-in point along Hillside Road, a distance of: 0.03 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Forth AM -4.3 (4 202007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 4 of 4 N m � U Q C omo (n O(i Q).9? a3 a) Q as -0 � !q i a COO Uo -dOcn NO co UfA rQ OO•CL n co a�caf6O 0-0 OCUOUi��/�/��'7 EC //L O 0 /C �E U N "= -LE �C N O UQ F _V ui aN CS C5 a) a) UC OC aU a OU UL CU 2aCNapCc0 .`-p "O a 0oCJ oa Q-0 fE U OC/) In N ).0 0 CU a)=3 O ❑� z EE C'r C C UNCC a) a) Q Na) O a) CN E+' cu cuO U) U O 1p Q� (nLa)o ❑°tea ON c U) CSN O0 0-00 0 o Uo co v N 0O (0 C C O a� a) E o E U `D ai ci � o �= (A to 0 cu C a) U m m U U LLI � a I ' 0 0 0 0 o a o ao'i ❑ Q L ❑ c 0 t7 C7 W U J O � � O � I O O O CL c O O O O O O O C a) E C E rn rn N F 13 E j N C � C o o �n � �n a -oa 06 06 .O .� o O c o coco N C a U a0 C7 00 a0 C C O N W N C a Ldco a �. 00 � � N N °�_ °�2 �2 � ap DD �O N N O O U a3 � o� a3 � O O (00 � (00 C S C N a a3 � 7 N>�04 Q cN LO Q O Q mai O po�o�c=c 0 co =a- p � � � U ot) a) � N � � � O off$ �O c � o � I I � opcfl3co�ao�o� oZS a) oZS a) � co c � c � � O> LL c � oZ oZ �n o ai o 3 g 3� a� � O CN —0 N�� a3 � a3 Z a) Z O W' O O W W � W � W � Z O Z W Z W Z O W s� E O .� •� � •� � •� r g ' a�� �� o0 or m 30 � N �c� ao 00 pd' a) 00 �o co co 0o po Zco 00 0o Zci '.LL o � o � o �� ��o L-: LL N U- U- O © T- U) W 22p vse O W a--� O Z ci � o C a) m m m U U LLI � L� E o 0 0 0 0 o a o ao'i ❑ Q Q ❑ m t7 C7 W U c g c N E C E c m E c C � C O C O ` C O U a a a Q a3 a3 � Q a3 � Q f6 a3 � Q o Q Q o Q O I I \\ \\ §\ 0) ���CD 2k { &g % � c \f± f f «f P § § u = o> In i / E I § §\ a: f R m# ��k§ �k - - �E \7»2 bk 2 .2 tJ keGk p° _0 # @_ Eta)§ & 2 §� 0 §E ® � / _ c & ¥% ± = 3 6 f e c \\\/ 7 f/ f 7m o§ a I $t 9 b of 2 # = 7� /§ 22 ��� / 2pz \ d d 0 E£ $ ) \� 0 =a£ � Q¥ » » 0k 3 3 k% \\ a) c = ek / m G% / U ° - / # % ƒ § % CN =o 0 CD ©®� � `� E » t � ca cl 2 .§ _ \ _ ■ 0 /\ .�� . N L 0 cu N 0 U) W 0 W 4-1� � IN z 5 � k k k § k k 2 � / E S E E a a a 6 6 a � k 11-1 \ \ k ® 4 � e � e k 2 E � � � $ 2 § S § § m�m�w52222w2 �»�®2Z=?of22 � 4-40 04242 0 � c � c 2 ® _ _ ® 2 2 �2 = $� 2� $� 2 g m 2 X06 K o k o$\ k\ k\ k\ �-�---�-I--- \w2w�m%n%I�w f/f///f/f/// %Q 2//323§ESS zazaoazazdoa �/�/�/�/�/�/ 7 I _ --3 � � � E 3 3 £ a a � � / / / E E § d d t § \ \ \ / � k k � � k < < < } \ \ \ \ k \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-6 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 670, LOST MOUNTAIN ROAD; WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0670-080-284, the Route 670 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0670-080-284; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and I A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Radford to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor Mahoney and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: DebdFah C. Jacky Chief Deputy Clerk o e Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County -------------------------------------------------------- By resolution of the governing" The following MOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and i, changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County ----------------------------------------------- ?ted September 8, 2020 as part of the g*Wrning body's resolution for Report of Changes in the Secondary System of St tiKHighways Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Abandonment, VDOT Project Related Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-912 Street Name and/or Route Number Lost Mountain Road, State Route Number 670 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .37 mi W of Int of Rtes 694 & 1780 To: .04 mi S to be -in point along Ex Rte 670, a distance of: 0.04 miles. VDOT Form AM -43 (4.20'2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways ftlectlSubdivision 0670-080-284 M501 Lyue Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Action The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.2-705, ❑33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Canyon Road, State Route Number 670 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .36 mi W to Int of Rtes 694 & 1780 To: >.01 mi N to tie-in point along Rte 670, a distance of: 0.01 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Lost Mountain Road, State Route Number 670 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .36 mi W to Int of Rtes 694 & 1780 To: .03 mi S to tie-in point along Rte 670, a distance of: 0.03 miles. Recordation Reference: WA Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Fonn AM -4.3 W20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 C � U Q C Et O 0 0 y ON O 0 V N j T- O U) N 0 0 O Q N N_ ��`- j O L.0m C 0 m y -O C�3 X00 c fn0 C G 0 N c N U'�'- 0 O E C 0O 0 m c`o fn oCCC m°vi y - cn2 co N o 0 (n �. Uc O C �� 0Na) O �N C N O UQ QE m-0 a m❑ -C '0() �O C° 00 O O � 0 �° o C m�OV V 0 cOiC O 0 0 'O Vm U)N 2mOO L a O J LU 0 m fnC .0 O m0 0 0 .` Q-pmU 0 N (D O C 0� Ocu C 0� m CVO .2 � EE 7 o O N N O N N O C 7Z U= V O in in z 0 i c'o N 3 v Q� tq O O �'0 O ,/ GI` L N 3 •O L C :n C:2 O O�0 U o 0 7 ami v ami j w O: � ami 0)i a fn U) ❑ m 0 0 MENEM c O m O ''Ocu o ° MECL O J O O O � cu cn O O O A O O O ° C N O m CN O O O CD O (�O O O 0 J N � O O O W T � � 0 � o � � O 0 T O � � °� m V otS �2S otS oZj C N � C C O rn w � 0 O (m 0) rn 0 0 m CO C° CO m CO m (O . m U) C N� N O cn C C A-) - - O °>Oo>00>0 >o E E E E E E Er SCO r-- "I �pM x,00 M�'? co CD c) Cl MO O O O O O O O� -- LL � LL � LL � w F- a� E o 0 0 0 0) � m m U U m c L � LL a� a°i E � � O L C v a Q Q CO m Q 0 w 0 w C) }' � ° o z 0 0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-7 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 715, PINE NEEDLE DRIVE; CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 6220-080-111, the Route 220 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 6220-080-111; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None TESTE: Deborah C. Jack/ / Chief Deputy Cle to the Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing botW-34opted September 8, 2020 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and inorp ated as part of tVego ruing body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. n t j� _ A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: Street Name and/or Route Number Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 Pine Needle Drive, State Route Number 715 Old Route Number: 0 --------------------------------------------- • From: .54 mi S of Int of Rtes 220 & 657 To: .06 mi W along Rte 657 to tie in point, a distance of: 0.06 miles. VDOT Donn AM -43 14"_020071 Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways PrQject/Subdivision 6220-080-111 C501 The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: L33.2-705, L33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Pine Needle Drive, State Route Number 715 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .55 mi S of Int of Rtes 220 & 657 To: .06 mi W along Rte 715 to tie in point, a distance of: 0.06 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Fonn AM4.3 (4202007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 qE �5 \k Et k* o \ /� ƒ =g C. ƒ S k ��LO co \ alf \ / - \ k\ CCC \\ _§/ \/E� fk I f \ EE gm%k EEa 0 bk 00 k § 2/ E2/§ & 2 CU_ ® �� m� / E & 7% O ± $ /6 3 cu-0 3 7 ���/ � = f} -0 co 9e £g 0 @ Km %�� ?/ �'� � \ % \� SIS if t# Q 2 m :(D m m z c& .� f\ a \// k \\ L— \ \ �\ Cl) 3 k% � { \ \y E E ff U) � \ / U 4-1 � - § / / CL 2 k q \j k ¥ E 0 \ / ƒ < � 2 0 ./ co Ap U) s \_ 0 ■ �� � kit / LO � �E %2 + LL 5N /\ w} ®�0 � � � W 2 0 U) z LMMJ % k k k \ O S S a e a \ \ 2 2 2: 2: c=ca�6 <44�®� 000&oa qR �m �f )/@� 2� §\J %_ 55» o �f/ZEfE 2®5 \\\�$� y�ttt� �n�=ro rofRm= aaooda �/�/�/ 7 O = ❑ \ 3 3 a / co = O \ � � 2 § / / � k \ � / < R < § o r o � q � � qE �5 \k Et k* o \ /� ƒ =g C. ƒ S k ��LO co \ alf \ / - \ k\ CCC \\ _§/ \/E� fk I f \ EE gm%k EEa 0 bk 00 k § 2/ E2/§ & 2 CU_ ® �� m� / E & 7% O ± $ /6 3 cu-0 3 7 ���/ � = f} -0 co 9e £g 0 @ Km %�� ?/ �'� � \ % \� SIS if t# Q 2 m :(D m m z c& .� f\ a \// k \\ L— \ \ �\ Cl) 3 k% � { \ \y E E ff U) � \ / U 4-1 � - § / / CL 2 k q \j k ¥ E 0 \ / ƒ < � 2 0 ./ co Ap U) s \_ 0 ■ �� � kit / LO � �E %2 + LL 5N /\ w} ®�0 � � � W 2 0 U) z LMMJ % k k k \ O S S a e a \ \ 2 2 2: 2: c=ca�6 <44�®� 000&oa qR �m �f )/@� 2� §\J %_ 55» o �f/ZEfE 2®5 \\\�$� y�ttt� �n�=ro rofRm= aaooda �/�/�/ 7 O = ❑ \ 3 3 a / co AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-8 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 628, WOOD HAVEN ROAD; CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0628-080-232, the Route 628 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0628-080-232; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM - 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Hooker to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None Chief Deputy Clerk cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation )rs In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing body adgpted September 8, 2020 The following MOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incotOoratd as part ofZ11- verning body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. II r ^ A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Secondary System of Highways �•.- di'fTiTZ'1 =-1rl'TTS&Mnm fly . •_ 1 - iu = 1 The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: Street Name and/or Route Number Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 Wood Haven Road, State Route Number 628 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .14 mi E Int Rt 628 & Rt 1542 (B) To: .11 mi W Int Rt 628 & Rt 1440 (C), a distance of: 0.12 miles. VDOT Fenn AM -43 (4 20 2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways ft4ectJSubdivision 0628-080-232 C501 The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.2-705, L33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Wood Haven Road, State Route Number 628 Old Route Number: 0 --------------------------------------------- • From: .14 mi E Int Rt 628 & Rt 1542 (B) To:. 11 mi W Int Rt 628 & Rt 1440 (C), a distance of: 0.12 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Fonn AM -43 (4420"2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 2 \f 0 O �� e� > D �2 ` U . /� 0 oa :3 c� M 2 § ¢% § / R k k\ �CL �ww�w�\ƒ 2cn p I a_� 0 k3 ob / R m9 P-Ec �] - . 2 2 �E EE \\/ '&E �/�/�/// ¢/ J / \2 ' ewe =o�c 2 % 2 W = c° a m 7 §_ CUmeo E E o � u c $ o= = o of n� / L) § £ p f ¥% p = ] a 7 07 � n I / \ 2/ ° �t � \ 3 R $ U � �f //2C O �& � tt ��2 22 .� $ § .a u-§ - 22 o $ f± ca) a-mo m m c& cu a) § = m c$ =3£ §¥ \ » 0G \ a C%4 \ \ 0 0 \ \3-0- \ � � ƒ ƒ /E U � >� � O � § � k k k k / f 2 2 � 2 a e a a _ k 2 = o 00 00 00 OC) \ 3 \ � & � � / co 5 4%/%/k U����? \ / 73 \f7274# X } M / � � � � � \ � � � ��/4 \ g 21 . \ �\/3 . �. f=- >^ » � �� O` co F- i LU 2 ) O 4-0 �� O � 2 / z Lj oQoS� �ww�w�\ƒ �y///{y\ »f/Q/Q% %deeded% �/�/�/// 7 E Q Q 2 % & R a a < E E o $ § £ § \ k § / � \ / \ \ � < 3 � < 3 R $ � � � � � � � AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-9 REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, ROUTE 720, COLONIAL AVENUE; ROUTE 687, PENN FOREST BOULEVARD; ROUTE 1693, VEST DRIVE; ROUTE 1991; COLONIAL PLACE DRIVE; ROUTE 1521, GIRARD DRIVE; CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has completed Project 0720-080-299, the Route 720 Realignment Project; and WHEREAS, the project sketch and VDOT Form AM -4.3, attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution, defines adjustments necessary in the Secondary System of State Highways as a result of Project 0720-080-299; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 appear to no longer serve public convenience and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways; and WHEREAS, certain segments identified in the incorporated Form AM -4.3 are ready to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to take the necessary action to abandon those segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM -4.3 as part of the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-912, Code of Virginia, and 2. The Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the segments identified on the attached project sketch and Form AM- 4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to §33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and 3. A certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Residency, by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Deborah C. JacM ; Chief Deputy Clerk t� t e Board of Supervisors cc: Megan Cronise, Transportation Planning Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation In the County of Roanoke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ By resolution of the governing body adopted September 8, 2020 The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and in ted ted as part of the gererstling body's resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. f- �" A Copy Testee Signed (County Report of Changes in the Seleondar3�System of St* Highways Tyoe Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Abandonment The following facilities of the Secondary System of State Highways are hereby ordered abandoned, pursuant to the statutory authority cited: Reason for Change: Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: .i.. .1S- " Girard Drive, State Route Number 1521 Abandonment, VDOT Project Related §33.2-912 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .27 mi W of Int of Rtes 720 & 419 To: .03 mi N to tie-in point along Rte 1521, a distance of: 0.03 miles. Street Name and/or Route Number Colonial Avenue, State Route Number 720 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .03 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: .03 mi W of Int of Rtes 720 & 419, a distance of: 0.53 miles. Penn Forest Boulevard, State Route Number 687 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .07 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: .07 mi S to tie-in pant along Rte 687, a distance of: 0.07 miles. VDOT Fonn AM -43 (4%20/2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: September 8, 2020 Page 1 of 3 Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways ProjecVSubdivision 0720-080-299 C501 Tyne Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 033.2-705, X33.2-334 Street Name and/or Route Number Colonial Place Drive, State Route Number 1991 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .22 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: >.01 mi S to New Int Rtes 720 & 1991, a distance of: 0.01 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Vest Drive, State Route Number 1693 Old Route Number. 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .15 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: >.01 mi S to New Int Rtes 720 & 1693, a distance of: 0.01 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Girard Drive, State Route Number 1521 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .28 mi W of Int of Rtes 720 & 419 To: .04 mi N to tie-in point along Rte 1521, a distance of: 0.04 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 Street Name and/or Route Number Colonial Avenue, State Route Number 720 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .03 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: .03 mi W of Int of Rtes 720 & 419, a distance of: 0.52 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT form AM -4.3 (4'_02007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 2 of 3 Penn Forest Boulevard, State Route Number 687 Old Route Number: 0 -------------------------------------------- • From: .08 mi E of Int of Rtes 720 & 1620 To: .07 mi S to tie-in point along Rte 687, a distance of: 0.06 miles. Recordation Reference: N/A Right of Way width (feet) = 0 VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4 2W2007) Maintenance Division Date of Resolution: Page 3 of 3 N O C C M N CO O O U Q C J � � O O O O O U O O O O O A A a) Cl)M � '_FcQ O L, Q a) O O O O O O O O O O O� O� CO m _ N r N r N N N N N a) Not$ Nor$ COQ COQ O� COQ COQ 00 COO C C 'SOL V a) a) u) O C a) �a)a) o2S O o2S O o2S °� o2S C °tS C °2S � ot$ � O NO a) 'w pCL O N O N O O O O O O O O O N E C (n O N (L6 N n N� N N— N— N }N, N N a) 0C C C tq a) to a) N � a) •p � •p N C a) C N U O .L..1 C �- E c U LIC O UQ a) �:� QE m-p � O° O° O 0 0� O •C O� O N ' O O � a) a @ �� QCnQC� Cl)� Z Z c� c� c � c � c•� c O N U 0 C mea) V o � o O>° O>° O O O� O� O O U U"O O-0 O O Uca m� c =m-00 W> W> W W W W� W•� W•� m L a 0) a)m mC N a o ow Q-O m 0 •EE•EE•EE•EE•EE•E� E� in CD w o c a�i.0 Oma) oO+U COMM MM ti� �� a0� ln� N� C) �w m O o � EE O� O� O� O� C5 � O N O O +' c =z v�C O O O O O O O O O O O O� O� a) a) �� V O O a N C'ami E" E O H O � O� O � O � O � O mO)o Z N 3 v Q� N m wH wH wH LL LL wH LL CO CO C(0 •� a) N �° n Q U� ;= °ry C O c OM o o 0o CD of U � N � .o 0 0 O .s iO p a a ��// LL N a°) a) U m Q a Q Q E E cn co O w � 4-1 M r � � � ti U a CO O I I �w O o O C O O M vm) ,egg C:) ° 0 O m N cam^ C J Ch O N JPO � >, _U 7 O N � O � OCD m 0 N LL m O N O v ~ w O w Route 1620 � � � � Q O }' � = U) z a) D w w C7 — E o 0 0 0 0 p 0 m m U U 0 w = ;= C O c o O � U � N � .o 0 0 O .s O p a a Q� a �� Q a Q Q � Q � M r � � � ti O CO O CO / E/ o 4 ±9 ƒ_% C) I � % o(D /\ \ff § § �§ C: - U S 72 c CD m o> 0> Ca k ( C § \ / -Ec W/ N \ �E %f§/ _ _ _ (D Z, >_ L/ O \ 2-0 =®moo t 7 7\ O \ 0 = c 2 �M _ ] 2 cm \�\/ / / f k // ® £g f 7$ � =E� o c§ O 2 a Em /k/§ / / v = / c #§ EE �f / $ z $7 23 ® ( \ƒ \}f k .@ \ L) 0 �j 0 k% 3 3 \ \ N E E /y =f � \\ CD p U R � m � 0 Of § / _ ƒ k k k \ O S 3 / k o C) d d \ \ N q_ ° E 5 \ _q c==cce m ƒ ƒ / n 4 k 4 k _ 0 000coc �����2 ED w w w n w= $/$2 $2 : § o � o > / 5%»�5g ®727/7/ »%»3»a %\ z�z 2 2\ y2y#y2 00 � � ° §�§�\� l2ia o o/o\o\ ..��o�o m \ �e�e�e � � 3 a R 7 � N / � � � k k 0 . $ § N U) W R < 0 W � R � � � C-4 O � � Z / / ACTION NO. A-090820-10 ITEM NO. C-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 8, 2020 AGENDA ITEM: Request to affirm the recommendation of the County Administrator to transfer funds in the amount of $1,345,000 to the Public Service Center capital project and award separate contracts to Thor Construction for the base bid related to the Hollins Road scope of work and to S. Lewis Lionberger Construction for the base bid related to the Pre-engineered scope of work as bid per Roanoke County Invitation to Bid #2020-065 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Rob Light Director of General Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Affirm the recommendation of the County Administrator to award two separate contracts and the transfer of funds in the amount of $1,345,000 to the Public Service Center capital project BACKGROUND: The Public Service Center replacement project was initiated in the County's approved capital improvement plan in fiscal year 2017 with the authorization to conduct a building planning study to identify cost and operational options for the relocation of functions at the County's existing Public Service Center on Kessler Mill Road in Salem. Subsequently, the multi-year plan was developed to utilize the limited remaining site for the existing Center to relocate the Storm Water operations, and disperse the remaining functions to existing County locations and properties to be determined. The existing complex is mostly located in the 100 -year flood plain and has significant storm water capacity infrastructure issues that result in regular related impacts to the building and operations. The site houses: offices, warehouse needs, equipment, and Page 1 of 4 multiple district shops for the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism (PRT); offices, solid waste functions, facilities maintenance operations, and welding/small engine shops for General Services; shop and tower maintenance functions for the Communications Division of the Comm/IT Department; the Storm Water Division functions of the Development Services Department; County surplus warehouse needs for the Finance and Management Services Department; and various support needs for all County Departments to include a fuel center and wash bay. In fiscal years 2019 and 2020, key properties contiguous to the County's Fleet Service Center on Hollins Road were purchased to facilitate the project and Architectural and Engineering work commenced for all portions of the Phase I work with CJMW Architects. Phase I authorized in 2020 consists of all project components except work related to the Storm Water facility, construction of a district shop at Green Hill Park, expansion of the Fleet Center for all General Services functions, relocation of the Communications shop and surplus warehouse, and necessary fueling and wash bay support needs. Phase II is currently planned for fiscal year 2023 and will include the relocation of PRT offices, warehouse, equipment, and remaining district shop needs. DISCUSSION: The design work for all Phase I work has been completed, the formal invitation to bid issued and bids were received August 5, 2020. The Phase I scope was bid as two (2) projects in that the Stormwater and Green Hill shop portions will be pre-engineered buildings, while the remaining work on Hollins Road consists of typical commercial renovations and construction. Contractors were able to submit bids for one or both projects and the County reserved the option to award together or separately. Multiple bids were received for both projects and for a single project. The pricing received for accepted bids resulted in limited variance among the costs provided, thus reflecting a reasonable reflection of market costs for the work. Based on the bids received, staff would recommend awarding the base bid for the Hollins Road project to Thor Construction and the pre-engineered base bid to S. Lewis Lionberger Construction. The base bid from Thor Construction for the Hollins Road project was $6,722,000 and the base bid from Lionberger for the pre-engineered project was $2,823,000. The total combined bid costs are $9,545,000. While the contract with CJMW Architects was structured for their design to a fixed limit agreed upon construction amount, the lowest accepted bid combination noted above exceeds existing available funds. One of the County's options in this case is to provide Page 2 of 4 redesign work at no additional cost to the County. CJMW utilized multiple third -party construction estimating firms to establish and update this fixed limit amount at specified design milestones. Estimates from these third -party firms varied throughout the project and construction market pricing volatility and regional impacts were escalated due to the COVID pandemic. The utilitarian nature of all of the project components limits redesign options that may result in any tangible savings to subsequently rebid. While delaying a component(s) until fiscal year 2023 is an option, such costs will likely exceed the current bid amounts based on the historically inflationary nature of construction. FISCAL IMPACT: Total combined low bids costs for the project total $9,545,000. After land purchases, remaining funds available for the project totals $8,300,000. In order to complete the Phase I work authorized in fiscal year 2020, an additional $1,345,000 will need to be allocated to the project to cover the bids and a project contingency. Staff reviewed all capital accounts and recommends the reallocation of $1,045,000 from the Center for Research and Technology account and $300,000 from the Edward Rose account to the Public Service Center Project for a total of $1,345,000. Year-end savings for fiscal year 2020 are estimated at $3.5 million. Staff recommends that funding for the Center for Research and Technology account be restored from year- end funds later this fall with the final year-end report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board to affirm the recommendation of the County Administrator to transfer funds in the amount of $1,345,000 to the Public Service Center capital project and award separate contracts to Thor Construction for the base bid related to the Hollins Road scope of work and to S. Lewis Lionberger Construction for the base bid related to the Pre-engineered scope of work as bid per Roanoke County Invitation to Bid #2020- 065. Page 3 of 4 VOTE: Supervisor North moved to approve the staff recommendations. Supervisor Mahoney seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Rob Light, Director of General Services Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Meredith Thompson, Budget Division Director Page 4 of 4 Yes No Abstain Mr. Mahoney ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. North ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ cc: Rob Light, Director of General Services Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Meredith Thompson, Budget Division Director Page 4 of 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 ORDINANCE 090820-11 ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,217,365 FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR THE LOCALITY -BASED ALLOCATION DISTRIBUTED AS A COMPONENT OF THE CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITY (CARES) ACT OF 2020 WHEREAS, in response to the present Coronavirus pandemic, on March 17, 2020, the Board of Supervisors confirmed the County Administrator's declaration of state of emergency effective March 16, 2020, subsequent to declarations of states of emergency by the President of the United States and the Governor of Virginia; and WHEREAS, following such declarations of emergency, the United States Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which established a $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) to assist state, local, territorial and tribal governments with direct costs associated with the Coronavirus pandemic; and WHEREAS, Virginia's allocation of these funds is $3.1 billion; and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020, the Virginia Secretary of Finance notified the County that its second allocation of funds made available through the CARES Act is $8,217,365; and WHEREAS, these funds may be used only for qualifying expenses; the CARES Act provides that payments from the CRF may only be used to cover costs that 1) are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus disease; 2) were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as Page 1 of 2 of March 27, 2020 (the date of enactment of the CARES Act); and 3) were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 2020; and because County Administration would like to make such funds immediately available for County use, the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with since an emergency exists, upon a 4/5ths vote of the members of the Board. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sum of $8,217,365, made available to the County through the Commonwealth of Virginia from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, is accepted. 2. The sum of $8,217,365 is hereby appropriated to the County's Grant Fund, to be used for those purposes allowable under the Act. 3. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. On motion of Supervisor North to adopt the ordinance as an emergency measure and subject to future Board consensus regarding the unallocated $3.3 million amount; seconded by Supervisor Peters and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None cc: Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney Page 2 of 2 Drs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 EMERGENCY 090820-12 ORDINANCE READOPTING ORDINANCE 033120-1, TO EFFECTUATE TEMPORARY CHANGES IN CERTAIN DEADLINES AND TO MODIFY PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH PANDEMIC DISASTER WHEREAS, on March 31, 2020, the Board adopted emergency Ordinance 033120-1, to effectuate temporary changes in certain deadlines and to modify public meeting and public hearing practices and procedures to address continuity of operations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic disaster; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.2-1427 of the Code of Virginia, emergency ordinances shall not be enforced for more than sixty (60) days unless readopted; and WHEREAS, the Board readopted the ordinance on May 26, 2020 and July 14, 2020 -land WHEREAS, due to the ongoing nature of the COVID -19 pandemic, it is again proposed that the Board readopt Ordinance 033120-1; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 2020; and the second reading has been dispensed with, upon an affirmative vote of 4/5ths of the members of the Board, this being deemed to be an emergency measure pursuant to Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. That Ordinance 033120-1 is hereby readopted. Page 1 of 2 2. An emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None cc: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney A COFI'iC TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks J Chief Deputy Clerk 0 jKe Board of Supervisors Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 ORDINANCE 090820-13 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A TWENTY (20) -FOOT, SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND GRANTING OF A NEW TWENTY (20) -FOOT, SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY ROANOKE COUNTY TO FACILITATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AT THE COUNTY'S GENERAL SERVICES LOCATION ON KESSLER MILL ROAD (TAX MAP NO 036.03-01- 01.00.0000) WHEREAS, Roanoke County is undertaking a series of capital improvement projects, including a construction project at its General Services Facility at 1206 and 1216 Kessler Mill Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 ("Kessler Mill"); and WHEREAS such construction project will otherwise encroach upon an existing sanitary, sewer easement on Kessler Mill; and WHEREAS, for purposes of long-term planning, it is necessary to have a sanitary, sewer easement on the Kessler Mill property; and WHEREAS, such vacating the existing easement and granting a new easement will not have an adverse impact on the County's public right of way; and WHEREAS, the vacation of the existing sanitary sewer easement and grant of new sanitary sewer easement is more fully depicted on the attached plat and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 2020, and the second reading and public hearing was held on September 8, 2020. Page 1 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County shall vacate the existing twenty -foot, sanitary sewer easement and grant a new twenty -foot sanitary, sewer easement to the Western Virginia Water Authority on the County's Kessler Mill property, located at 1206 and 1216 Kessler Mill Road, Salem, Virginia 24153, which parcel is more specifically identified on Tax Map No. 036.03-01-01.00.0000, and the vacated easement and new easement are shown on the attached plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., and such conveyance is hereby authorized and approved. 2. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrators, either of whom may act, are authorized to execute, deliver and record the deeds, and any other documents on behalf of the County and to take all such further action as any of them may deem necessary or desirable in connection with this project. The form of the deed is hereby approved with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as the County Administrator may approve, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. Page 2of3 On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Hooker and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None A COPY-TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Cleric t e Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Light, Director of General Services Mary Beth Nash, Senior Assistant County Attorney Page 3 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 ORDINANCE 090820-14 AMENDING ARTICLE I (GENERAL PROVISIONS), ARTICLE II (DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES), AND ARTICLE III (DISTRICT REGULATIONS) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Roanoke County staff have reviewed and prepared amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding floodplain management; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's model ordinance, which complies with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's National Flood Insurance Program regulations; and WHEREAS, on March 5, 2020, after proper notice, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and recommended said amendments to the Board of Supervisors for adoption; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice are valid public purposes for such recommendations by the Planning Commission and action by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 2020, and the second reading and public hearing was held on September 8, 2020. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: Page 1 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through ARTICLE I — GENERAL PROVISIONS SEC. 30-5. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR; POWERS AND DUTIES. (A) The zoning administrator shall serve as the administrator of this ordinance otherwise specified. ARTICLE II — DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28. DEFINITIONS. (C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section shall have the meanings described below. Accessory building or structure: A building or structure detached from a principal building on the same lot and customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal building or use. Where an accessory building or structure is attached to the principal building in a substantial manner, as by a wall or roof, such accessory building shall be considered a part of the principal building. Accessory structures shall not exceed 600 square feet in special flood hazard areas. Base flood: The flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Base flood elevation (BFE): The water surface elevation of the base flood, that is, the flood level that has a one percent or greater chance of occurrence in any given year. ." The water surface elevation of the base flood in relation to the datum specified on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map. For the purpose of this ordinance, the base flood is the 1 % annual chance flood. Board of zoning appeals (BZA). The term board of zoning appeals will refer to the Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals, ^'"^ Y^{ 1YY,ncl in .Y +h„Y. 11Y IIN N , ^c QUA This board is appointed to review appeals made by individuals with regard to decisions of the zoning administrator, and in special flood hazard areas the decisions of the floodplain administrator, in the interpretation of this ordinance. In addition, the BZA is responsible for granting variances from local zoning regulations. Conditional letter of map revision (CLOMR): A formal review and comment as to whether a proposed flood protection project or other project complies with the minimum National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements for such projects with respect to Page 2 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through delineation of special flood hazard areas. A CLOMR does not revise the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) or Flood Insurance Study (FIS). Development: Any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate including but not limited to buildings or other structures, temporary structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or other land -disturbing activities, or permanent or temporary storage of equipment or materials. Elevated building: A non -basement building built to have the lowest floor elevated above the ground level by means of solid foundation perimeter walls, pilings, or columns (posts and piers). Encroachment: The advance or infringement of uses, plant growth, fill, excavation, buildings, permanent structures or development into a floodplain, which may impede or alter the flow capacity of a floodplain. Existing construction: For the purpose of the flood insurance program, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced before the effective date of the FIRM for that location, or before October 17, 1978, for FIRMs effective before that date. "Existing construction" may also be referred to as "existing structures" and "pre -FIRM." Flood or flooding: (1) A general or temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from: (a) the overflow of inland or tidal waters; or, (b) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. (c) Mudflows which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in paragraph (1)(b) of this definition and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current. (2) The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in paragraph 1 (a) of this definition. Flood insurance rate map (FIRM): An official map of a community, on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). Page 3 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Flood insurance study (FIS): A report by FEMA that examines, evaluates and determines flood hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of mudflow and/or flood -related erosion hazards. Floodplain administrator: The Floodplain Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia. The floodplain administrator shall be responsible for administering the floodplain regulations on behalf of the county. Floodproofing: Any combination of structural and non-structural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures and their contents. Floodway: The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot at any point within the community. Freeboard: A factor of safety usually expressed in feet above a flood level for purposes of floodplain management. "Freeboard" tends to compensate for the many unknown factors that could contribute to flood heights greater than the height calculated for a selected size flood and floodway conditions, such as wave action, bridge openings, and the hydrological effect of urbanization in the watershed. Highest adjacent grade: The highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. Hydrologic and hydraulic engineering analysis: Analyses performed by a licensed professional engineer, in accordance with standard engineering practices that are accepted by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation and FEMA, used to determine the base flood, other frequency floods, flood elevations, floodway information and boundaries, and flood profiles. Letter of map amendment (LOMA): An amendment based on technical data showing that a property was incorrectly included in a designated special flood hazard area. A LOMA amends the current effective Flood Insurance Rate Map and establishes that a Land as defined by metes and bounds or structure is not located in a special flood hazard area. Letters of map change (LOMC): A Letter of Map Change is an official FEMA Page 4 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through determination, by letter, that amends or revises an effective Flood Insurance Rate Map or Flood Insurance Study. Letters of Map Change include Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA), Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), and Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). Letter of map revision (LOMR): A revision based on technical data that may show changes to flood zones, flood elevations, floodplain and floodway delineations, and planimetric features. A Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMB -F) is a determination that a structure or parcel of land has been elevated by fill above the base flood elevation and is, therefore, no longer exposed to flooding associated with the base flood. In order to qualify for this determination, the fill must have been permitted and placed in accordance with the community's floodplain management regulations. Lowest adjacent grade: The lowest natural elevation of the ground surface next to the walls of a structure. New construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of an initial FIRM for that location, or after October 17, 1978, whichever is later, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. For floodplain management purposes, new construction means structures for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. Post -FIRM structures: A structure for which construction or substantial improvement occurred on or after the effective date of the initial FIRM for that location, or on or after October 17, 1978. Pre -FIRM structures: A structure forwhich construction or substantial improvement occurred before the effective date of the initial FIRM for that location, or before October 17, 1978. Recreational vehicle: A vehicle, built on a single chassis and measuring 400 square feet or less at the largest horizontal projection, which can be towed, hauled or driven, designed and used as temporary living accommodations for recreational, camping or travel uses only. Recreational vehicles shall include travel trailers, pick-up campers, motor homes, tent trailers or similar devices used for temporary mobile housing, boats and personal watercraft. Repetitive loss structure: A building covered by a contract for flood insurance that has incurred flood -related damages on two occasions in a 10 -year period, in which the cost of the repair, on the average, equaled or exceeded 25 percent of the market value of the structure at the time of each such flood event; and at the time of the second incidence of flood -related damage, the contract for flood insurance contains increased cost of compliance coverage. Page 5 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Severe repetitive loss structure: A structure that: (a) Is covered under a contract for flood insurance made available under the NFIP; and (b) Has incurred flood related damage — (i) For which 4 or more separate claims payments have been made under flood insurance coverage with the amount of each such claim exceeding $5,000, and with the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeding $20,000; or (ii) For which at least 2 separate claims payments have been made under such coverage, with the cumulative amount of such claims exceeding the market value of the insured structure. Shallow flooding area: A special flood hazard area with base flood depths from one to three feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate, and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. Special flood hazard area: The land in the floodplain subject to a one (1 %) percent or greater chance of being flooded in any given year as determined in Section 30-74-8 of this ordinance. Start of construction: For other than new construction and substantial improvement, start of construction means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, substantial improvement or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit date. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of the construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. Structure: Anything that is constructed or erected with a fixed location on the ground, or attached to something having a fixed location on the ground, including but not limited to buildings, signs, manufactured homes and swimming pools. Walls and fences shall not be deemed structures except as otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. For floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. Substantial damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed fifty (50) percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. It also means flood -related damages sustained by a structure on two occasions in a 10 -year Page 6 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through period, in which the cost of repair, on average, equals or exceeds 25 percent of the market value of the structure at the time of each such flood event. Substantial improvement. Any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) percent of the market value of the structure before the start of construction of the improvement. This term includes structures which have incurred repetitive loss or substantial damage regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include (1) Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions; or (2) Any alteration of a historic structure provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure; or (3) Historic structures undergoing repair or rehabilitation that would constitute a substantial improvement as defined above, must comply with all ordinance requirements that do not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure. Documentation that a specific ordinance requirement will cause removal of the structure from the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic places must be obtained from the Secretary of the Interior or the State Historic Preservation Officer. Any exemption from ordinance requirements will be the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. SEC. 30-29. USE TYPES; GENERALLY. Sec. 30-29-2. Residential Use Types. Manufactured home: A structure subject to federal regulation, which is transportable in one (1) or more sections: is eight (8) body feet or more in width and forty (40) body feet or more in length in the traveling mode, or is three hundred twenty (320) or more square feet when erected on site; is built on a permanent chassis; is designed to be used as a single-family dwelling, with or without a permanent foundation, when connected to the required utilities; and includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained in the structure. For floodplain management purposes also included are park trailers, travel trailers, and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. ARTICLE III — DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-74. FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT. Sec. 30-74-1. Purpose. Page 7 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (A) The purpose of the Floodplain Overlay (FO) District is to provide mandatory floodplain restrictions for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) compliance. The purpose of these floodplain provisions is to prevent the following 1. The loss of life, health, or property; 2. The creation of health and safety hazards; 3. The disruption of commerce and governmental services; 4. The extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief; and 5. The impairment of the tax base. (B) These provisions are designed to accomplish the above purposes by: Regulating uses, activities, and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities, and development, will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities, and frequencies; 2. Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities, and development from locating within areas subject to flooding; 3. Requiring all those uses, activities, and developments that do occur in flood - prone areas to be protected and/or flood -proofed against flooding and flood damage; 4. Protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards. Sec. 30-74-2. Applicability and Administration. (A) These provisions shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Roanoke County and identified as special flood hazard areas (SFHAs), shown on the flood insurance rate map (FIRM) or included in the flood insurance study (FIS) provided to Roanoke County by FEMA. (B) These provisions shall supersede any regulations currently in effect in floodplain areas. Where conflict exists between these provisions and those of any underlying zoning district, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. Page 8 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (C) In the event any provision concerning a floodplain area is declared inapplicable as a result of any legislative or administrative actions or judicial discretion, the basic underlying zoning district provisions shall remain applicable. Sec. 30-74-3. Compliance. (A) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated, constructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compliance with the terms and provisions of this section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. (B) The degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this section is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on acceptable engineering methods of study, but does not imply total flood protection. Larger floods may occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man- made or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. This section does not imply that areas outside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such areas, will be free from flooding or flood damages. (C) This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke County or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. Sec. 30-74-4. Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance shall be declared invalid for any reason whatever, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. The remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect; and for this purpose, the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Sec. 30-74-5. Designation of the Floodplain Administrator The County Administrator shall designate the Floodplain Administrator for Roanoke County. Sec. 30-74-6. Duties and Responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator The duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include but are not limited to: (A) Review applications for permits to determine whether proposed activities will be located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). (B) Interpret floodplain boundaries and provide available base flood elevation and flood hazard information. Page 9 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (C) Review applications to determine whether proposed activities will be reasonably safe from flooding and require new construction and substantial improvements to meet the requirements of these regulations. (D) Review applications to determine whether all necessary permits have been obtained from the Federal, State or local agencies from which prior or concurrent approval is required; in particular, permits from state agencies for any construction, reconstruction, repair, or alteration of a dam, reservoir, or waterway obstruction (including bridges, culverts, structures), any alteration of a watercourse, or any change of the course, current, or cross section of a stream or body of water, including any change to the one hundred year frequency floodplain of free-flowing non -tidal waters of the State. (E) Verify that applicants proposing an alteration of a watercourse have notified adjacent communities, the Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management), and other appropriate agencies (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)) and have submitted copies of such notifications to FEMA. (F) Approve applications and issue permits to develop in flood hazard areas if the provisions of these regulations have been met, or disapprove applications if the provisions of these regulations have not been met. (G) Inspect or cause to be inspected, buildings, structures, and other development for which permits have been issued to determine compliance with these regulations orto determine if non-compliance has occurred or violations have been committed. (H) Review Elevation Certificates and require incomplete or deficient certificates to be corrected. (1) Submit to FEMA, or require applicants to submit to FEMA, data and information necessary to maintain the FIRM, including hydrologic and hydraulic engineering analyses prepared by or for Roanoke County, within six months after such data and information becomes available if the analyses indicate changes in base flood elevations. (J) Maintain and permanently keep records that are necessary for the administration of these regulations, including: Flood Insurance Studies, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (including historic studies and maps and current effective studies and maps) and Letters of Map Change (LOMC); and 2. Documentation supporting issuance and denial of permits, Elevation Certificates, documentation of the elevation (in relation to the datum on the Page 10 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through FIRM) to which structures have been flood -proofed, inspection records, other required design certifications, variances, and records of enforcement actions taken to correct violations of these regulations. (K) Enforce the provisions of these regulations, investigate violations, issue notices of violations or stop work orders and require permit holders to take corrective action. (L) Advise the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) regarding the intent of these regulations and, for each application for a variance, prepare a staff report and recommendation. (M) Administer the requirements related to proposed work on existing buildings: Make determinations in consultation with the building official as to whether buildings and structures that are located in flood hazard areas and that are damaged by any cause have been substantially damaged. 2. Make reasonable efforts to notify owners of substantially damaged structures of the need to obtain a permit to repair, rehabilitate, or reconstruct. Prohibit the non-compliant repair of substantially damaged buildings except for temporary emergency protective measures necessary to secure a property or stabilize a building or structure to prevent additional damage. (N) Undertake other actions which may include but are not limited to: issuing press releases, public service announcements, and other public information materials related to permit requests and repair of damaged structures; coordinating with other Federal, State, and local agencies to assist with substantial damage determinations; providing owners of damaged structures information related to the proper repair of damaged structures in special flood hazard areas; and assisting property owners with documentation necessary to file claims for Increased Cost of Compliance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) flood insurance policies. (0) Notify FEMA when the corporate boundaries of Roanoke County have been modified and: Provide a map that clearly delineates the new corporate boundaries or the new area for which the authority to regulate pursuant to these regulations has either been assumed or relinquished through annexation; and 2. If the FIRM for any annexed area includes special flood hazard areas that have flood zones that have regulatory requirements that are not set forth in these regulations, prepare amendments to these regulations to adopt the FIRM and appropriate requirements, and submit the amendments to the governing body for adoption; such adoption shall take place at the same Page 11 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through time as or prior to the date of annexation and a copy of the amended regulations shall be provided to Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management) and FEMA. (P) Upon the request of FEMA, complete and submit a report concerning participation in the NFIP which may request information regarding the number of buildings in the SFHA, number of permits issued for development in the SFHA, and number of variances issued for development in the SFHA. (Q) It is the duty of the Floodplain Administrator to take into account flood, mudslide and flood -related erosion hazards, to the extent that they are known, in all official actions relating to land management and use throughout the entire jurisdictional area of the community, whether or not those hazards have been specifically delineated geographically (e.g. via mapping or surveying). Sec. 30-74-7. Use and Interpretation of FIRMs The Floodplain Administrator shall make interpretations, where needed, as to the exact location of SFHAs, floodplain boundaries, and floodway boundaries. The following shall apply to the use and interpretation of FIRMs and data: (A) Where field surveyed topography indicates that adjacent ground elevations: Are below the base flood elevation in riverine SFHAs, even in areas not delineated as a special flood hazard area on a FIRM, the area shall be considered as SFHA and subject to the requirements of these regulations; 2. Are above the base flood elevation and the area is labelled as a SFHA on the FIRM, the area shall be regulated as SFHA unless the applicant obtains a Letter of Map Change that removes the area from the SFHA. (B) In FEMA -identified SFHAs where base flood elevation and floodway data have not been identified and in areas where FEMA has not identified SFHAs, any other flood hazard data available from a Federal, State, or other source shall be reviewed and reasonably used. (C) Base flood elevations and designated floodway boundaries on the FIRM and in the FIS shall take precedence over base flood elevations and floodway boundaries by any other sources if such sources show reduced floodway widths and/or lower base flood elevations. (D) Other sources of data shall be reasonably used if such sources show increased base flood elevations and/or larger floodway areas than are shown on the FIRM and in the FIS. Page 12 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (E) If a Preliminary FIRM and/or a Preliminary FIS has been provided by FEMA: Upon the issuance of a Letter of preliminary flood hazard data shall hazard data previously provided administering these regulations. Final Determination by FEMA, the be used and shall replace the flood from FEMA for the purposes of 2. Prior to the issuance of a Letter of Final Determination by FEMA, the use of preliminary flood hazard data shall be deemed the best available data pursuant to Section 30-74-8(A)3 and used where no base flood elevations and/or floodway areas are provided on the effective FIRM. 3. Prior to issuance of a Letter of Final Determination by FEMA, the use of preliminary flood hazard data is permitted where the preliminary base flood elevations or floodway areas exceed the base flood elevations and/or designated floodway widths in existing flood hazard data provided by FEMA. Such preliminary data may be subject to change and/or appeal to FEMA. Sec. 30-74-48. Delineation of Areas. (A) The various special floods hazard areas shall include the SFHAs areas r, 60 by The basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the FIS and the FIRM for the Roanoke County prepared by ManageffieRt FEMA, dated September 28, 2007, as amended, and any subsequent revisions or amendments thereto. Roanoke County may identify and regulate local flood hazard and ponding areas that are not delineated on the FIRM. These areas may be noted on a "Local Flood Hazard Map" using the best available topographic data and locally derived information such as flood of record, historic high water marks or approximate study methodologies. The boundaries of the SFHAs are established as shown on the FIRM which is declared to be a part of this ordinance and which shall be kept on file at the Roanoke County offices. These areas are more specifically defined as follows: 1. The Floodway is part of an AE Zone and is delineated, for purposes of this section, using the criteria that a certain area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one percent annual chance flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 45 of the above referenced FIS and shown on the accompanying FIRM Page 13 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through The following provisions shall apply within the Floodway of an AE zone: a. Within any floodway area, no encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, or other development shall be permitted unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analysis performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly reflect currently -accepted technical concepts. Studies, analyses, computations and other required information shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the Floodplain Administrator. Development activities which increase the water surface elevation of the base flood may be allowed, provided that the applicant first applies — with Roanoke County's endorsement — for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR), and receives the approval of the FEMA. Once approved by FEMA, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Sections 30-74-13 and 30-74-15. b. The placement of manufactured homes (mobile homes) is prohibited, except in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision. A replacement manufactured home may be placed on a lot in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision provided the anchoring, elevation, and encroachment standards are met. n thin 4 Thin hz=mc fi= thin hi�, nalz= 4 �f thin F_L�,�d F-ropog 32. The AE or AH Zones that are designated as AE or AH Zones on the FIRM accompanying the FIS shall be the areas for which one percent annual chance flood elevations have been provided 6 --it {or v.,h " wand the floodway has not been delineated. The following provisions shall apply within an AE or AH zone where FEMA has provided base flood elevations: Page 14 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through a. Until a regulatory floodway is designated, no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within the SFHA, designated as Zones AE or AH on the FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within Roanoke County. Development activities in Zones AE or AH on the County of Roanoke's FIRM which increase the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than one foot may be allowed, provided that the applicant first applies - with Roanoke County's endorsement - for a CLOMR, and receives the approval of FEMA. 43. The A Zone, or Approximated Floodplain, on the FIRM accompanying the FIS, shall be those floodplain area for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided, but the one percent annual chance floodplain boundary has been approximated, and all other floodplain areas where the drainage area is greater than 100 acres. For these areas, the following provisions shall apply: a. The base flood elevations and floodway information from federal, state, and other acceptable sources shall be used, when available. Where the specific one percent annual chance flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data such as the-, USACE Floodplain Information Reports, U. S. Geological Survey Flood -Prone Quadrangles, et&= and similar sources, then the applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this base flood elevation 0190 EO) P For development proposed in the approximate floodplain the applicant must use technical methods that correctly reflect currently accepted practices, such as point on boundary, high water marks, or detailed methodologies hydrologic and hydraulic analyses. Studies, analyses, computations, and other information shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the Floodplain Administrator. Page 15 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through b. The Floodplain Administrator reserves the right to require a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for any development. When such base flood elevation data is utilized, the lowest floor shall be elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches for non- residential structures and twenty-four (24) inches for residential structures. C. During the permitting process, the Floodplain Administrator shall obtain: The elevation of the lowest floor (in relation to mean sea level), including the basement, of all new and substantially improved structures; and, ii. If the structure has been flood -proofed in accordance with the requirements of Section 30-74, the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure has been flood - proofed. Base flood elevation data shall be obtained from other sources or developed using detailed methodologies comparable to those contained in a FIS for subdivision proposals and other proposed development proposals (including manufactured home parks and subdivisions) that exceed fifty lots or five acres, whichever is the lesser. 4. The AO Zone, shall be those areas of shallow flooding identified as AO on the FIRM accompanying the FIS. For these areas, the following provisions shall apply: a. All new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the flood depth specified on the FIRM, above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM. If no flood depth number is specified, the lowest floor, including basement, shall be elevated no less than two feet above the highest adjacent grade. b. All new construction and substantial improvements of non-residential structures shall: Have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the flood depth specified on the FIRM, above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM. If no flood depth number is specified, the lowest floor, including basement, shall be Page 16 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through elevated at least two feet above the highest adjacent grade; or, ii.. Together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities be completely flood -proofed to the specified flood level so that any space below that level is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. C. Adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes shall be provided to guide floodwaters around and away from proposed structures. (B) The mapped floodplain, includes all of the above regions and also the regions designated as having a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding on any flood map or flood insurance study. In this area, no new emergency service, medical service, or governmental records storage shall be allowed except through the variance process. Sec. 30-74-69. Creation of Overlay. (A) The floodplain areas described above shall be an overlay to the existing underlying zoning districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, and as such, the provisions for the floodplain areas shall serve as a supplement to the underlying zoning district provisions. (B) The boundaries of the floodplain areas are established as shown on the FIRM which is declared to be part of this chapter and which shall be kept on file in the office of the Floodplain Administrator. Sec. 30-74-610. Floodplain Boundary Changes and Interpretation (A) In regards to jurisdictional boundary changes, the County Floodplain Ordinance in effect on the date of annexation shall remain in effect and shall be enforced by the municipality for all annexed areas until the municipality adopts and enforces an ordinance which meets the requirements for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. Municipalities with existing Floodplain Ordinances shall pass a resolution acknowledging and accepting responsibility for enforcing Floodplain Ordinance standards prior to annexation of any area containing identified flood hazards. If the FIRM for any annexed area includes special flood hazard areas that have flood zones that have regulatory requirements that are not set forth in these regulations, prepare amendments to these regulations to adopt the FIRM and appropriate requirements, and submit the amendments to the governing body for adoption; such adoption shall take place at the same time as or prior to the date of annexation and a copy of the amended regulations shall be provided to Page 17 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management) and FEMA. In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44 Subpart (B) Section 59.22 (a) (9) (v) all NFIP participating communities must notify the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) and optionally the State Coordinating Office in writing whenever the boundaries of the community have been modified by annexation or the community has otherwise assumed or no longer has authority to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations for a particular area. In order that the FIRM accurately represent the community's boundaries, a copy of a map of the community suitable for reproduction, clearly delineating the new corporate limits or new area for which the community has assumed or relinquished floodplain management regulatory authority must be included with the notification. (AB) The delineation of any of the floodplain areas may be revised by Roanoke County where natural or man-made changes have occurred and/or where more detailed studies have been conducted or undertaken by USACE or other qualified agency, or an individual documents the need for such change. However, prior to any such change, approval must be obtained from FEMA. A completed LOMR is a record of this approval. (IBC) Initial interpretations of the boundaries of the floodplain areas shall be made by the Floodplain Administrator. Should a dispute arise concerning the boundaries of any of the floodplain areas, the BZA shall make the necessary determination. The person questioning or contesting the location of the floodplain area boundary shall be given an opportunity to present his case to the hic)nrd of =E)- appeals BZA and to submit technical evidence. Procedures for such appeals shall be as outlined in Section 30-24 of this ordinance. Sec. 30-74-11. Submitting Model Backed Technical Data A community's base flood elevations may increase or decrease resulting from physical changes affecting flooding conditions. As soon as practicable, but not later than six (6) months after the date such information becomes available, a community shall notify FEMA of the changes by submitting technical or scientific data. Such a submission is necessary so that upon confirmation of those physical changes affecting flooding conditions, risk premium rates and floodplain management requirements will be based upon current data. Sec. 30-74-12. Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) (A) When development in the floodplain will cause or causes a change in the base flood elevation, the applicant, including state agencies, must notify FEMA by Page 18 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through applying for a CLOMR and then a LOMR. Example cases may include, but not be limited to: Any development within the floodway that causes a rise in the base flood elevations. 2. Any development occurring in Zones Al -30 and AE without a designated floodway, which will cause a rise of more than one foot in the base flood elevation. 3. Alteration or relocation of a stream (including but not limited to installing culverts and bridges) 44 Code of Federal Regulations §65.3 and §65.6(x)(12). Sec. 30-74413. Floodplain Area Provisions, Generally. (A) All uses, activities, and development occurring within any floodplain area, including placement of manufactured homes, shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a permit. Such development shall be undertaken only in strict compliance with the provisions of this section and with all other applicable codes and ordinances such as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (VA USBC) and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the Floodplain Aadministrator shall require all applications to include compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and shall review all sites to assure they are reasonably safe from flooding. Under no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or development adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways or any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. Page 19 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through ( ) All applications for development in the floodplain district and all building permits issued for the floodplain shall incorporate the following information: 1. For structures to be elevated, the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement). 2. For structures to be flood proofed (non residential only), the elevation to which the structure will be flood proofed. 3. The elevation of the ene h, pdrnd yea base flood at the site. 4. Topographic information showing existing and proposed ground elevations. ( ) For all new subdivisions which adjoin or include floodplain areas identified in the FIS, the base flood elevation shall be shown on the final record plat. (D) The following provisions shall apply to all permits: New construction and substantial improvements shall be built according to Section 30-74-8 of this ordinance and the VA USBC, and anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure. 2. Manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This standard shall be in addition to and consistent with applicable state anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. 3. New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. 4. New construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage. 5. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment and other service facilities, including duct work, shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 6. New and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system. Page 20 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through 7. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters. 8. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located and constructed to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. 9. Prior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels or of any watercourse, stream, or other water feature, within this jurisdiction a permit shall be obtained from the USACE, the VADEQ, and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (a joint permit application is available from any of these organizations). Furthermore, in riverine areas, notification of the proposal shall be given by the applicant to all affected adjacent jurisdictions, the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management), other required agencies, and FEMA. 10. The flood carrying capacity within an altered or relocated portion of any watercourse shall be maintained. Sec. 30-74--14. Floodway Development Regulations. (A) In the floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such development on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements which have been approved by all appropriate authorities as required above. (B) The placement of any manufactured home, except in an existing manufactured home park within the floodway is specifically prohibited. (C) In the floodway, the following uses, types and activities are permitted provided that (1) they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district, (2) are not prohibited by any other ordinance and (3) no specific land use requires any type of structure, fill, or storage of materials and equipment: Page 21 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through 1. Agricultural 2. Public Parks and Recreational Areas 3. Outdoor Sports and Recreation 4. Golf Courses 5. Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas. 6. Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as, but not limited to, yard areas, parking and loading areas, and airport landing strips€. Sec. 30-74-15. Elevation and Construction Standards In all identified flood hazard areas where base flood elevations have been provided in the FIS or generated by a certified professional in accordance with Section 30-74-8, the following provisions shall apply: Page 22 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (A) Residential Construction New construction or substantial improvement of any residential structure (including manufactured homes) in Zones AE, AH and A with detailed base flood elevations shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood level plus twenty-four (24) inches. Equipment or mechanical items for all residential buildings constructed, substantially improved, and/or reconstructed due to substantial damage shall be elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches. (B) Non -Residential Construction New construction or substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or non-residential building (or manufactured home) shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches. 2. Non-residential buildings located in all AE, and AH zones may be flood - proofed in lieu of being elevated provided that all areas of the building components below the elevation corresponding to the BFE plus two feet are water tight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water, and use structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effect of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certification, including the specific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structures are flood -proofed, shall be maintained by the Floodplain Administrator. (C) Space below the Lowest Floor In zones A, AE, AH, and AO, fully enclosed areas, of new construction or substantially improved structures, which are below the regulatory flood protection elevation shall: Not be designed or used for human habitation, but shall be used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or limited storage of maintenance equipment used in connection with the premises. Access to the enclosed area shall be the minimum necessary to allow for parking of vehicles (garage door) or limited storage of maintenance equipment (standard exterior door), or entry to the living area (stairway or elevator). 2. Be constructed entirely of flood resistant materials below the regulatory flood protection elevation; Page 23 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through 3. Include measures to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. To meet this requirement, the openings must either be certified by a professional engineer or architect or meet the following minimum design criteria: a. Provide a minimum of two openings on different sides of each enclosed area subject to flooding. b. The total net area of all openings must be at least one (1) square inch for each square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. C. If a building has more than one enclosed area, each area must have openings to allow floodwaters to automatically enter and exit. d. The bottom of all required openings shall be no higher than one (1) foot above the adjacent grade. e. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other opening coverings or devices, provided they permit the automatic flow of floodwaters in both directions. f. Foundation enclosures made of flexible skirting are not considered enclosures for regulatory purposes, and, therefore, do not require openings. Masonry or wood underpinning, regardless of structural status, is considered an enclosure and requires openings as outlined above. (D) Accessory Structures Accessory structures in the SFHA shall comply with the elevation requirements and other requirements of 30-74-15(B) or, if not elevated or dry flood -proofed, shall: 1 Not be used for human habitation; 2 Be limited to no more than 600 square feet in total floor area; 3 Be useable only for parking of vehicles or limited storage; 4 Be constructed with flood damage -resistant materials below the base flood elevation; rJ Be constructed and placed to offer the minimum resistance to the flow of floodwaters; 6 Be anchored to prevent flotation; 7. Have electrical service and mechanical equipment elevated to or above the base flood elevation; Page 24 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through $ Shall be provided with flood openings which shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be a minimum of two flood openings on different sides of each enclosed area; if a building has more than one enclosure below the lowest floor, each such enclosure shall have flood openings on exterior walls. b. The total net area of all flood openings shall be at least 1 square inch for each square foot of enclosed area (non -engineered flood openings), or the flood openings shall be engineered flood openings that are designed and certified by a licensed professional engineer to automatically allow entry and exit of floodwaters; the certification requirement may be satisfied by an individual certification or an Evaluation Report issued by the ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. C. The bottom of each flood opening shall be 1 foot or less above the higher of the interior floor or grade, or the exterior grade, immediately below the opening. d. Any louvers, screens or other covers for the flood openings shall allow the automatic flow of floodwaters into and out of the enclosed area. (E) Standards for Manufactured Homes and Recreational Vehicles All manufactured homes placed, or substantially improved, on individual lots or parcels, must meet all the requirements for new construction, including the elevation and anchoring requirements in Section 30-74-13 and Section 30-74-15. 2. All recreational vehicles located in a FEMA designated floodplain shall either: a. Be on site for fewer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, be fully licensed and inspected, and ready for highway use; or b. Meet the minimum requirements for placement and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes as contained in the VA USBC; or C. Be fully licensed and highway ready. A recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and has no permanently attached additions. Page 25 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through (F) Standards for Subdivision Proposals All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; 2. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage; 3. All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards; and 4. When the FIS does not provide detailed base flood elevations, base flood elevation data shall be obtained from other sources or developed using detailed methodologies, hydraulic and hydrologic analysis, comparable to those contained in a Flood Insurance Study for subdivision proposals and other proposed development proposals (including manufactured home parks and subdivisions) that exceed fifty lots or five acres, whichever is the lesser. Sec. 30-74-126. Existing Structures in Floodplain Areas. (A) Any structure or use of a structure or premises must be brought into Page 26 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through conformity with these provisions when it is changed, repaired, or improved unless one of the following exceptions is established before the change: The Floodplain Administrator has determined that: a. Change is not a substantial repair or substantial improvement; and b. No new square footage is being built in the floodplain that is not compliant; and C. No new square footage is being built in the floodway; and d. The change complies with the zoning ordinance and the VA USBC. 2. , QP The changes are required to comply with a citation for a health and safety violation. 3. The structure is a historic structure and the change requires would impair the historic nature of the structure. SMINVITMIN­ Z ; 7m; Page 27 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Page 28 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Sec. 30-74-147. Variances. (A) Variances shall be issued only upon a showing of good and sufficient cause, and after the BZA has determined that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. While the granting of variances generally is limited to a lot size less than one-half acre, deviations from that limitation may occur. However, as the lot size increases beyond one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing a variance increases. Variances may be issued by the BZA for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, in conformance with the provisions of this Section. Variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the criteria of this Section are met, and the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. In passing upon applications for variances, the BZA shall satisfy all relevant factors and procedures set forth in Section 30-24-1 et seq. of the zoning ordinance and consider the following additional factors: The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. No variance shall be granted for any proposed use, development, or activity within any Floodway District that will cause any increase in the one percent (1 %) chance flood elevation. Page 29 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through 2. The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury of others. 3. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. 4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners. 5. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the county. 6. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. 7. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. 8. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. 9. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for the county. 10. The safety of access by ordinary and emergency vehicles to the property in time of flood. 11. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 12. The historic nature of a structure. Variances for repair or rehabilitation of historic structures may be granted upon a determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. 13. No variance shall be granted for an accessory structure exceeding 600 square feet. 14. Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this Ordinance. (B) The BZA may refer any application and accompanying documentation pertaining to any request for a variance to any engineer or other qualified person or agency for technical assistance in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, and the adequacy of the plans for protection and other related matters. Variances shall only be issued after the Z=0000 nl:�I:�Innlc BZA has determined that the granting of such will not result in: Page 30 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through Unacceptable or prohibited increases in flood heights; 2. Additional threats to public safety; 3. Extraordinary public expense; 4. Creation of nuisances; 5. Fraud or victimization of the public; or, 6. Conflict with local laws or ordinances. Variances shall only be issued after the BZA has determined that the variance will be the minimum to provide relief . (C) The BZA shall notify the applicant for a variance, in writing, that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the one percent (1 %) flood elevation (a) increases the risks to life and property, and (b) will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance. A record of the above notification as well as all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, shall be maintained and any variances which are issued shall be noted in the annual report submitted to the FIA. Sec. 30-74-18. Records. Records of actions associated with administering this ordinance shall be kept on file and maintained by or under the direction of the Floodplain Administrator in perpetuity. Sec. 30-74-19. Violations. The failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the county's floodplain management regulations shall be considered a violation. A structure or other development without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in Sections 30-74-13 (9), 30-74-15 (B) 2, 30-74-15 (E) 4, and 30-74- 16 (A) is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. Sec. 30-74-20. Penalty for Violations Section 30-22 of the Zoning Ordinance contains provisions for enforcement of this section and penalties that apply for violations. Page 31 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Mahoney and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None TESTS: D6borah C. Jades /' T Chief Deputy Clerl� to he Board of Supervisors cc: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning Rachel Lower, Senior Assistant County Attorney Rebecca James, Zoning Administrator Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services Page 32 of 32 Note: Text additions are in red font. Text deletions are in red font and are struck through ACTION NO. A -090820-15.a ITEM NO. 1-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: September 8, 2020 Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission (At -Large) Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Confirmation of appointment BACKGROUND: Don Witt has served on the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission since 1997 and has decided to retire. His appointment expired April 7, 2020. DISCUSSION: The Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission has recommended the appointment of Barry Trent for a three-year term to expire September 8, 2023. It is the consensus of the Board to appointment Mr. Trent. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of this appointment. Page 1 of 2 VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to confirm the appointment. Supervisor Mahoney seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Doug Blount, Director of Parks Recreation and Tourism Lindsay Webb, Parks Planning and Development Manager Liz Belcher, Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator Page 2 of 2 Yes No Abstain Mr. Mahoney ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. North ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ cc: Doug Blount, Director of Parks Recreation and Tourism Lindsay Webb, Parks Planning and Development Manager Liz Belcher, Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. A -090820-15.b ITEM NO. 1-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: September 8, 2020 Request to approve the Board of Supervisors budget development calendar for fiscal year 2021-2022 Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Daniel R. O'Donnell County Administrator Planning for the fiscal year 2021-2022 operating and capital budgets is underway. Attachment A is the budget development calendar detailing required Board of Supervisors actions, public hearings, budget work sessions, and briefings associated with both the operating and capital budgets. BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget development process, the Department of Finance and Management Services prepares a budget development calendar for approval by the Board of Supervisors. While the calendar is subject to change, it provides the Board of Supervisors and County staff a clear timeline to meet all legal obligations associated with both the operating and capital budgets. The budget calendar also adheres to requirements set forth within the Comprehensive Financial Policy. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the budget development calendar. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget development calendar. Page 1 of 2 VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to approve the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget development calendar. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. cc: Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Meredith Thompson, Budget Division Director Page 2 of 2 Yes No Abstain Mr. Mahoney ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Hooker ® ❑ ❑ Mr. North ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Peters ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Radford ® ❑ ❑ cc: Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Meredith Thompson, Budget Division Director Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT A Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget Development Calendar (dates subject to change) IofI Date Board Actions Public Hearings Briefings/Work Sessions 8 -Sep -20 Approval of FY 2021-2022 budget development calendar (consent agenda) 22 -Sep -20 Work Session: Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Preliminary and Unaudited Year -End Overview 20 -Oct -20 Work Session: Capital Projects Status Update (General Services, PRT, Finance & Management Services) 4 -Nov -20 Work Session: Review of Fiscal Year 2020-2021 First Quarter Revenue & Expenditure Update (Administration / Finance & Management Services) 1 -Dec -20 Presentation of Year End Financial Briefing: 2021 Assessment & Regional Results for June 30, 2020, Economic Conditions (Assessor, acceptance of audit report and Economic Development, Finance & allocation of year end funds Management Services) 12 -Jan -21 Work Session: County Financial Polices Review - if necessary 26 -Jan -21 Approval of updated County Briefing: County Administrator's financial policies - if necessary Proposed FY 2022-2031 Capital (resolution) Improvement Program Presentation Work Session: FY 2020-2021 Mid -Year Revenue and Expenditure Update; Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget Issues 9 -Feb -21 Work Session: FY 2021-2022 Revenue Outlook; County Fees & Charges Compendium 23 -Feb -21 Work Session: FY 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program; Capital Projects Status Update § 9 -Mar -21 Briefing: County Administrator's Proposed FY 2021-2022 Operating Budget Presentation 23 -Mar -21 Adoption of 2021 maximum tax rates Public Hearing: Effective Tax Work Session: Proposed FY 2021-2022 (resolution) Rate (if necessary) Operating Budget Information Public Hearing: Maximum Tax Rate 13 -Apr -21 Adoption of 2021 tax rates (order) Public Hearing: Tax Rate Work Session: Proposed FY 2021-2022 Adoption Operating Budget Information Public Hearing: Operating and Capital Budgets (first of two) 27 -Apr -21 First reading of budget ordinances Public Hearing: Operating and (total of five ordinances) Capital Budgets (two of two) 11 -May -21 Second reading of budget ordinances (total of five ordinances) Approval of operating and capital budgets, revenues and expenditures For County and Schools (resolution) IofI AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER S, 2020 RESOLUTION 09 2 -15 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for, designated as item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3 inclusive, as follows: Approval of minutes — August 25, 2020 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission (At -Large) 3. Request to approve the Board of Supervisors budget development calendar for fiscal year 2021-2022 On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Mahaney and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Peters, Radford NAYS: None TESTE: DeD+erah G. Jas/ � Chief Deputy a the Board of Supervisors Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 RESOLUTION 090820-16 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Page 1 of 2 On motion of Supervisor Radford to adopt the resolution, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, North, Peters NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Hooker, Peters A CORY TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks / Chief Deputy Clerk t4 the oard of Supervisors Page 2 of 2