Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/23/2023 - RegularRoanoke County Board of Supervisors May 23, 2023 INVOCATION: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board." Page 1 of 6 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda May 23, 2023 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for May 23, 2023. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.qov. Our meetings are closed -captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. BRIEFINGS 1. Legislative briefing regarding the 2023 session of the General Assembly (Peter S Lubeck, County Attorney) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution adopting 1) the fiscal year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget Revenues and Expenditures for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools and 2) the fiscal years 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools and 3) the fiscal year 2023-2024 Fee Compendium (Steve Elliott, Budget Administrator) Page 2 of 6 E. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinances to appropriate funds for: (a) Fiscal year 2023-2024 operations budget and approval of the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024 for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (b) Fiscal year 2023-2024 capital budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and (c) Fiscal year 2023-2024 for Roanoke County Public Schools Categories (Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services) F. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Public hearing for citizen comments and second reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 10-3 (Levying of License Fees and Taxes) of the Roanoke County Code, raising the threshold of annual gross receipts for those entities required to pay the County Business License Tax (from $135,000 or more to $150,000 or more); and requiring entities that are below that threshold to pay only an annual $50 license fee (Steve Elliott, Budget Administrator) 2. The petition of Boing US Holdco, Inc. to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and CVOD, Clearbrook Village Overlay District, located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road and 5147 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) 3. The petition of Martie Murphy to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2 (High Intensity Commercial District), and C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with conditions) located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard, Vinton Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) (appointed by District) 2. Roanoke County Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) 3. Roanoke County Library Board (appointed by District) 4. Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District) Page 3 of 6 H. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — February 28, 2023 2. Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $51,000 for fiscal year 2024 for shuttle service to the National Park Service's McAfee Knob Trailhead Parking Lot, Catawba Magisterial District (Second Reading) 3. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $187,242 in Virginia Department of Transportation Open Container Funding for the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 (VDOT UPC No. 97171) Project, Catawba Magisterial District (Second Reading) 4. The petition of Larry and Rhonda Conner to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 1.32 acres of land zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 5859 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hill Magisterial District (First Reading and request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 5. The petition of Parker Design Group, Inc. to obtain a special use permit for religious assembly on approximately 2.91 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located on Oakland Boulevard between 233 Hershberger Road and 4843 Oakland Boulevard, Hollins Magisterial District (First Reading and request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 6. Resolution approving the First Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Agreement 7. Resolution approving the First Amendment to the County Attorney's employment agreement 8. Confirmation of appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) (District); Community Policy & Management Team (CPMT); Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (TPO); Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission; Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee; Virginia Western Community College Board; Western Virginia Water Authority 9. Resolution accepting a donation of a recycling trailer from Cox Communications for additional capacity at Fallowater Lane Page 4 of 6 10. Resolution requesting that the U.S. Department of Transportation fund a Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant to install Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure at Explore Park, Vinton Magisterial District 11. Request to approve fiscal agent agreement for the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection (RCACP) 12. Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority 13. Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority I. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS J. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of April 30, 2023 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of April 30, 2023 5. Accounts Paid — April 30, 2023 K. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to discuss the employee engagement study results (Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator; Judy England -Joseph, Consultant, Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement) EVENING SESSION — 7:00 P.M. L. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Terio and Lisa Comerose to remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS (Agricultural/Village Center District with conditions and special use permit) and AR (Agricultural/Residential District) located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) Page 5 of 6 2. The petition of Hugo Jimenez to 1) rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) to 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District), and to 2) obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard located at 5681 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Phil C. North 2. Paul M. Mahoney 3. David F. Radford 4. P. Jason Peters 5. Martha B. Hooker O. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 of 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Legislative briefing regarding the 2023 session of the General Assembly SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside for Eldon James to review the 2023 session of the General Assembly. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution adopting 1) the fiscal year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget Revenues and Expenditures for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools and 2) the fiscal years 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools and 3) the fiscal year 2023-2024 Fee Compendium SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution adopting the fiscal year 2023-2024 County operating budget, the fiscal year 2023-2024 capital budget, the fiscal year 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program for the Schools and County of Roanoke, Virginia and fiscal year 2023-2024 Roanoke County Public Schools Categories. BACKGROUND: Attached is a resolution approving the fiscal year 2023-2024 operating budget for Roanoke County, Virginia. This resolution is detailed by fund and includes all transfers between funds. The fiscal year 2023-2024 Roanoke County Public School's categories is included in the overall County budget as presented in the attached resolution as part of Schedules 1 and 2. Also included in the resolution for approval and prepared in conjunction with the fiscal year 2023-2024 operating budget are the fiscal year 2023-2024 capital budget and fiscal years 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program for the County and the Schools. A summary of sources of funds and projects included as part of the County capital budget and the County and Schools Capital Improvement Program are attached as Schedule 3. Page 1 of 2 Adoption of these documents does not represent an appropriation of funds. The commitment of funds will not occur until the second reading and approval of the fiscal year 2023-2024 budget appropriation ordinance, which is later in the agenda. In regards to the County and Schools Capital Improvement Program, only the fiscal year 2023-2024 capital budget will be appropriated as part of the budget appropriation ordinance. Adoption of the ten (10)-year plan does not represent an appropriation of funds for all years of the plan. Years two (2) through ten (10) of the Capital Improvement Plan are presented for informational and planning purposes only. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the budget is being requested to fulfill the County's legal requirements of adopting, and then having a first and second reading of the budget appropriation ordinance before July 1, 2023, and to allow adequate time for County and School staff to prepare and disburse employment contracts, institute pay changes and other administrative tasks necessary for final budget implementation. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the resolution provides County and Schools funding effective July 1, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution. Page 2 of 2 Schedule #1 County of Roanoke Adopted Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget Revenues & Roanoke County Public Schools Categories May 23, 2023 Revenues - County Amount General Fund - County General Government General Property Taxes $ 169,552,000 Sales Tax 15,800,000 Communications Sales and Use Tax 2,550,000 Consumer Utility Tax 3,750,000 Business License Tax 7,800,000 Bank Franchise Tax 690,000 Motor Vehicle License Fees 2,450,000 Recordation Taxes 1,650,000 Hotel and Motel Room Tax 1,650,000 Tax on Prepared Foods 6,100,000 Other Local Taxes 1,920,000 Permits, Fees & Licenses 1,174,267 Fines and Forfeitures 558,500 Use of Money and Property 685,414 Charges for Services 3,820,000 Commonwealth 13,835,595 Federal 6,588,000 Other 6,273,498 Subtotal, General Government $ 246,847,274 Public Works Projects $ 175,732 Fleet Service Center 4,086,231 Communications & Information Technology 13,952,894 Recreation Fee Class 5,198,646 Children's Services Act (CSA) 7,948,166 Grants and Other Funds 2,024,936 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - Schools Operations 418,291 Police E-Citation Special Revenue Fund 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee Fund 40,000 Police Special Programs 2,500 Criminal Justice Academy 454,152 Subtotal, Other General Funds $ 34,361,548 Total, General Fund - County $ 281,208,822 Page 1 of 2 Amount Debt Service Fund - from County $ 14,878,894 Debt Service Fund - from Schools 4,125,345 Capital Projects Fund - County 15,137,628 Internal Service Fund - County 15,791,194 Total, All County Funds $ 331,141,883 Categories - Schools Amount Schools Instruction $ 141,100,293 Schools Administration, Attendance, and Health 8,937,355 Schools Pupil Transportation 10,790,025 Schools Operation and Maintenance 19,795,233 Schools Food Service and Other Noninstructional Operations 8,584,234 Schools Facilities 28,299,221 Schools Debt and Fund Transfers 22,605,537 Schools Technology 14,015,177 Schools Non -Categorical Spending 26,862,657 Total, All Schools Categories $ 280,939,732 Total: All County and Schools $ 612,081,615 Less: Transfers (132,026,058) Total Net of Transfers $ 480,055,557 Page 2 of 2 Schedule #2 County of Roanoke Adopted Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget Expenditures & Roanoke County Public Schools Categories May 23, 2023 Expenditures - County Amount General Fund - County General Government General Administration $ 3,977,516 Constitutional Officers 20,197,569 Judicial Administration 1,131,328 Management Services 3,889,755 Public Safety 40,201,627 Community Services 16,362,861 Human Services 26,838,112 Non -Departmental 18,543,547 Transfers to School Operating Fund 86,782,060 Transfers to (from) Capital Fund 4,280,046 Transfers to Debt Service Fund - County Debt 7,610,134 Transfers to Debt Service Fund - Schools Debt 7,095,566 Transfers to Internal Services - Risk Management 2,154,003 Transfer to Public Works Projects 175,732 Transfer to Criminal Justice Academy 212,143 Transfer to Children's Services Act Fund - County 1,934,000 Transfer to Children's Services Act Fund - Schools 1,879,000 General Government Expenditure Contingency 608,162 Addition to Fund Balance 2,974,113 Subtotal, General Government $ 246,847,274 Public Works Projects $ 175,732 Fleet Service Center 4,086,231 Communications & Information Technology 13,952,894 Recreation Fee Class 5,198,646 Children's Services Act (CSA) 7,948,166 Grants and Other Funds 2,024,936 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - Schools Operations 418,291 Police E-Citation 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee 40,000 Police Special Programs 2,500 Criminal Justice Academy 454,152 Subtotal, Other General Funds $ 34,361,548 Total, General Fund - County $ 281,208,822 Page 1 of 2 Amount Debt Service Fund - County $ 19,004,239 Capital Projects Fund - County 15,137,628 Internal Service Fund - County 15,791,194 Total, All County Funds $ 331,141,883 Categories - Schools Amount Schools Instruction $ 141,100,293 Schools Administration, Attendance, and Health 8,937,355 Schools Pupil Transportation 10,790,025 Schools Operation and Maintenance 19,795,233 Schools Food Service and Other Noninstructional Operations 8,534,234 Schools Facilities 28,299,221 Schools Debt and Fund Transfers 22,605,537 Schools Technology 14,015,177 Schools Non -Categorical Spending 26,862,657 Total, All Schools Categories $ 280,939,732 Total: All County and Schools $ 612,081,615 Less: Transfers (132,026,058) Total Net of Transfers $ 480,055,557 Page 2 of 2 Roanoke County - Unrestricted Cash General Government Transfer Capital Reserves VPSA Refunding Bonds Debt Fund - County Reallocation of Completed or Cancelled Projects Schedule #3 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022 - FY 2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Funding Sources FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $2,900,000 $5,150,000 $6,585,000 $8,650,000 $9,500,000 $7,250,000 $7,500,000 $8,000,000 5,925,138 3,083,395 0 0 0 0 0 0 167,625 124,750 124,125 125,931 122,831 82,944 82,631 82,631 280,812 280,812 276,487 279,309 279,354 143,006 137,366 0 306,503 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal, Unrestricted Cash $9,580,078 $8,638,957 $6,985,612 $9,055,240 $9,902,185 $7,475,950 $7,719,997 $8,082,631 Roanoke County - Restricted Cash CommlT Fund Transfer CommlT Fund Balance CommlT Communications Fund Balance Subtotal, Restricted Cash FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $325,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non -County Funding Sources Stormwater Local Assistance Fund Transfer from Schools Contribution from the City of Salem Contribution from the City of Roanoke Subtotal, Non -County Funding Sources FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,550 61,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $517,550 $1,311,750 $250,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 Roanoke County - Bonds Lease / Revenue Bonds FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $0 $0 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 $0 $0 Subtotal, Lease/Revenue Bonds $0 $0 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $20,000,000 $0 $0 Total, All County Funding Sources $ 10,422,628 $ 10,075,707 $ 28,360,612 $ 9,180,240 $ 9,902,185 $ 27,850,950 $ 7,719,997 $ 8,082,631 $ Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) - All Funding Sources Transfer from Schools General Fund Major Capital Reserves Debt Fund - Schools Grant Funds County transfer for cash in MOU VPSA Refunding Credits VPSA Bond Issue FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 640,703 676,244 700,833 725,424 752,750 644,694 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 116,750 116,250 117,931 114,831 74,943 74,631 3,987 4,012 25,000,000 95,000,000 0 0 20,000,000 0 20,000,000 20,000,000 Total, RCPS Funding Sources $29,007,453 $102,892,494 $3,168,764 $3,440,255 $23,677,693 $3,819,325 $23,103,987 $23,104,012 Total, FY 24-33 County & RCPS Funding Sources $39,430,081 $112,968,201 $31,529,376 $12,620,495 $33,579,878 $31,670,275 $30,823,984 $31,186,643 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2021- FY 2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2024-2033 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. Category/Department/Project FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Assessments and Studies Planning New Zoning Ordinance $150,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Housing Study 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Roanoke River Greenway Feasibility Study 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Williamson Road/Peters Creek Road Multimodal Safety Study 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Planning Total 750,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assessments and Studies Total $750,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $o SO $o $o Buildings and Facilities Library Hollins Library Replacement 0 500,000 15,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 Library Total 0 500,000 15,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commomwealth's Attorney Commonwealth's Attorney Office Renovations 0 431,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commomwealth's Attorney Total 0 431,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire and Rescue New Bonsack/460 Fire Station 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hollins Fire Station Replacement 0 0 0 0 600,000 16,000,000 0 0 Fire Station Improvements/Replacement/Additions 0 0 5,400,000 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 Fire and Rescue Total 0 0 5,400,000 0 600,000 20,000,000 0 0 General Services Bent Mtn & Mount Pleasant Library Renovations & Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 2,150,000 Courthouse HVAC Replacement 500,000 800,000 5,100,000 0 0 0 0 Public Safety Center HVAC and UPS Replacements 2,050,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brambleton Center HVAC Replacement 0 0 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 RCAC HVAC Replacement 0 0 0 0 5,200,000 0 0 0 Public Service Center Facility Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Services Total 2,550,000 800,000 525,000 5,100,000 5,200,000 0 160,000 2,150,000 Parks and Recreation Explore Park (Phase II) 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 Green Ridge Dehumidification 0 0 740,000 0 0 0 0 0 Sportsfield Lighting Program 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 250,000 150,000 Parks and Recreation Total 0 0 1,490,000 0 0 500,000 250,000 150,000 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2021- FY 2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects All Projects (Continued) Note: Projects with $0 in FY2O24-2033 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. Category/Department/Project FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Buildings and Facilities (Continued) Sheriff's Office Jail Roof Replacement Sheriff's Office Total 135,000 475,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 135,000 475,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buildings and Facilities Total $2,685,000 $2,206,200 $23,015,000 $5,100,000 $5,800,000 $20,500,000 $410,000 $2,300,000 Capital Maintenance Programs & Recurring Development Services NPDES-M54 BMP Construction $100,000 $200,000 $500,000 $100,000 $150,000 $750,000 $100,000 $100,000 Storm Drainage Maintenance of Effort 0 240,000 510,000 0 240,000 320,000 430,000 340,000 Development Services Total 100,000 440,000 1,010,000 100,000 390,000 1,070,000 530,000 440,000 Parks and Recreation Green Ridge Capital Maintenance Program 75,000 100,000 100,000 75,000 125,000 375,000 400,000 150,000 PRT Capital Maintenance Program 725,000 725,000 725,000 725,000 750,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 750,000 Parks and Recreation Total 800,000 825,000 825,000 800,000 875,000 1,625,000 1,650,000 900,000 Economic Development Roanoke County Broadband Authority Infrastructure 387,149 383,664 383,664 384,983 0 0 0 0 Wood Haven Technology Park 370,479 370,843 370,581 370,148 369,543 370,534 370,866 369,224 Economic Development Total 757,628 754,507 754,245 755,131 369,543 370,534 370,866 369,224 General Services General Services Capital Maintenance Program 880,000 880,000 886,367 865,109 872,642 2,060,416 2,704,131 1,868,407 General Services Total 880,000 880,000 886,367 865,109 872,642 2,060,416 2,704,131 1,868,407 Sheriff's Office Sheriff's Office Capital Maintenance Program 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 155,000 155,000 Sheriff's Office Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 155,000 155,000 Capital Maintenance Programs & Recurring Total $2,662,628 $3,024,507 $3,600,612 $2,645,240 $2,657,185 $5,300,950 $5,409,997 $3,732,631 Computer Infrastructure, Software and Hardware Communications & IT Genesis Operations Bridge $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Radio Systems RF Sites Generator Replacement 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wave Critical Connect Upgrade 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 County -Wide Computer Replacement Program 260,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 County -Wide Cisco Phone Replacement Program 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 Email and Business Productivity Tools Replacement 150,000 200,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 Enterprise GIS Maps and Apps Upgrade 400,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2021- FY 2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects All Projects (Continued) Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2024-2033 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. Category/Department/Project FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Computer Infrastructure, Software and Hardware(Continued) Communications & IT IT Infrastructure Replacement Plan 1,200,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 750,000 800,000 1,200,000 911 Phone and Radio Console Upgrade 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTEK Console Encryption Keying Upgrade 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roanoke Valley Radio System Hardware Upgrade 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rural Broadband Initiative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CommlT Total 2,350,000 4,345,000 1,095,000 920,000 920,000 1,320,000 1,070,000 1,470,000 Finance/Human Resources Global Payroll Module 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Finance/Human Resources Total 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elections Voting Machine Replacement 425,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elections Total 425,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Library Public Computer Replacement 50,000 100,000 100,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Library Total 50,000 100,000 100,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Computer Infrastructure, Software and Hardware Total $3,825,000 $4,445,000 $1,195,000 $985,000 $995,000 $1,400,000 $1,150,000 $1,550,000 Transportation Planning VDOT Revenue Sharing Program $250,000 $300,000 $550,000 $450,000 $450,000 $650,000 $750,000 $500,000 Glade Creek Greenway at Vinyard Park West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Williamson Road Pedestrian Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buck Mountain/ Starkey Rd Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Planning Total 250,000 300,000 550,000 450,000 450,000 650,000 750,000 500,000 Parks and Recreation East Roanoke River Greenway 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Roanoke River Greenway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks and Recreation Total 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation Total $500,000 $300,000 $550,000 $450,000 $450,000 $650,000 $750,000 $500,000 Subtotal, Roanoke County Projects $10,422,628 $10,075,707 $28,360,612 $9,180,240 $9,902,185 $27,850,950 $7,719,997 $8,082,631 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2021- FY 2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects All Projects (Continued) Category/Department/Project FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Roanoke County Public Schools Schools Burton Center for the Arts & Technology 27,257,453 53,864,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Maintenance Program $1,250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 HR Payroll and Software System 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WE Cundiff Elementary 0 23,764,119 0 0 0 0 0 0 Glen Cove Elementary 0 23,764,120 0 0 0 0 0 0 Northside Middle 0 0 1,418,764 1,440,255 21,427,693 1,319,325 13,537,963 0 Hidden Valley Middle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,660,036 Glenvar Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,066,024 10,943,976 Schools Total 29,007,453 102,892,494 3,168,764 3,440,255 23,677,693 3,819,325 23,103,987 23,104,012 Total, Roanoke County Public Schools Projects $29,007,453 $102,892,494 $3,168,764 $3,440,255 $23,677,693 $3,819,325 $23,103,987 $23,104,012 Total, FY 22-31 County & Schools Projects $39,430,081 $112,968,201 $31,529,376 $12,620,495 $33,579,878 $31,670,275 $30,823,984 $31,186,643 FY 2023-2024 Fee Changes Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Booking Fee Courthouse Maintenance Fees Courthouse Security Fees Other Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Amusement Machine Fee Bondsman License Fee Business License Fee Carnivals, Circuses and Speedways Fortune-teller, astrologists, etc. Going out of business sale permit Massage Parlor License Non -Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licensee Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums Shows and Sales License Solicitor Permit Wine, Beer, and Mixed Beverage Licenses Development Services Fees Building and Trade Permit Fees Certificate of Occupancy Fees Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fees Miscellaneous Development Fees Subdivision Review Fees Stormwater Management Permit Fees Finance & Management Services Fees Payment in Lieu of Taxes Table of Contents Page Number I Fire and Rescue Fees 2 Ambulance Fees 2 Fire Marshal Permits and Fees 2 General Services - Solid Waste Fees 3 Bear Container Retrofits Fee 3 Non -Resident and Premium Solid Waste Collectic 4 Library Fees 4 Library Facility and Rental Fees 4 Library Material Fines and Services Fees 4 Passport Fees 5 Planning Fees 5 Planning & Zoning Fees 5 Special Use Permit Fee 5 Weed and Trash Abatement Penalty 6 Zoning Verification Fees 6 Police Fees 7 Adult Business Permit Fee 7 Animal Boarding Services Fees 7 Concealed Handgun Permit 8 Criminal Justice Academy Fees Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems License Fee I I False Alarm Fees 14 Fingerprinting Fee 15 Mopeds Traffic Violations 15 Parade Fees 16 Parking Tickets 17 Police E-Citation Fee 23 Sale of Records of Arrests, Offenses and Traffic A 23 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Table of Contents Page Number Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees 46 Recreation Fees, Membership Fees, and Rentals 46 Public Information Fees 52 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Charges 52 Public Transportation (CORTRAN) Fees 54 CORTRAN Fee per Trip 54 Real Estate Valuation Fees 55 Land Use Fees 55 Sheriff and Jail Fees 57 Board of Prisoners - Salem 57 Canteen Fees 57 Daily Jail Fees 57 Fingerprint Cards 57 Home Electronic Monitoring 58 Medical Costs 58 Process Service 58 Sobrieter 59 Weekender Jail Fees 59 Social Services Fees 60 Custody Investigations/Home Studies 60 Guardianship Fee 60 Home Study for Parental Placement Adoptions 60 Treasurer Fees 61 Animal Control - Cat Tags 61 Animal Control - Dog Tags 61 Animal Control - Dangerous Dogs 62 Collection Fee 62 Debt Set -Off Fee 63 Judicial Tax Sale Fees 63 Returned Check Fee 64 Vehicle License Fee 64 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium FY 2023-2024 Roanoke County Fee Changes Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Business License Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3703 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article 1, Section 10-3, Ordinance -' Fee Description FY 2i Business License Fee Gross Receipts Tess $135,000 Annual license fee for issuance of a license on businesses, trades, professions, occupations, and callings, firms, corporations, or persons with gross receipts Tess $135,000 $150,000. $5( than $150,000 than County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Booking Fee Legislative Authorization Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-8 Ordinance 040803- I 0 Fee Effective Date Description Booking Fee April 8, 2003 Fee as part of the costs in each criminal or traffic case in which a period incarceration or confinement in the county jail shall be imposed or serve any part of the sentence for conviction of any statute or ordinance. Courthouse Maintenance Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 17. I -28I Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-6 Ordinance 0209I0-4 Fee Effective Date Description Courthouse Maintenance Fees February 9, 2010 Fee on the costs in each civil, criminal and traffic case in the district and circuit courts serving Roanoke County for the construction, renovation ; maintenance of the courthouse or jail and court -related facilities and to defray increases in the cost of heating, cooling electricity, and ordinary maintenance. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Courthouse Security Fees Legislative Authorization Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-9 Ordinance 062607- 15 Fee Effective Date Description Courthouse Security Fees July I, 2007 Fee on each criminal or traffic case in which an individual is convicted of violation of any statute or ordinance. Other Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Information on fees paid to the Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court as set by the Commonwealth of Virginia can E the link below: http://webdev.courts.state.va.us/cgi-bin/DJIT/ef djs_ccfees_calc.cgi County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Amusement Machine Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3720 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-53 Fee Effective Date Description Amusement Machines June 25, 1996 Fee for coin -operated amusement machines or devices. $25 for 3 machi or fewer, $25 for each additional machine up to a maximum of $200 for machines or more. Bondsman License Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3724 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-40 Fee Effective Date Description Bondsman License January I, 1989 Annual license for every person who, for compensation, enters into any or bonds for others, whether as principal or surety. Business License Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3703 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article I, Section 10-3, Ordinance Fee Effective Date Description Business License Fee Gross Receipts Tess than $135,000 $150,000 7/1/2019 Annual license fee for issuance of a license on businesses, trades, profess occupations, and callings, firms, corporations, or persons with gross rece Tess $135,000 $150,000. 7/1/2023 than County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Carnivals, Circuses, and Speedways Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3728 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-57 Fee Effective Date Description Carnivals, Circuses, and Speedways January 1, 1989 License fee per performance for the operation of a carnival, circus, or speedway Fortune-tellers, astrologists, etc. Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3726 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-41 Fee Effective Date Description Fortune-tellers, astrologists, etc. January I, 1989 Annual license for every person engaged in business as a fortune-teller, clairvoyant, phrenologist, spirit medium, astrologist, hypnotist, palmist, of handwriting analyst. Going out of business sale permit Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 18.2-223 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-58, Ordinance 5 Fee Effective Date Description Going out of business sale permit October I, 1992 Fee of $65 for a permit to operate a sale to liquidate the goods or assets business that is closing. Massage Parlor License Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3706 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-50 Fee Effective Date Description Massage Parlor License January I, 1989 Annual license to operate a massage parlor. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Non -Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3717 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-45 Fee Effective Date Description Peddler of Non Perishable Goods November 10, 2015 Fee for any person who carries from place to place any goods, wares, or general merchandise of a non-perishable nature. Fee is $250 per month, vehicle, not to exceed $500 per year. Itinerant Merchant of Non Perishable Goods November 10, 2016 Fee for any person who transacts a business in a location for a period of than one year to sell goods of a non-perishable nature. Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-45 Fee Effective Date Description Peddler of Perishable Goods November 10, 2015 Fee for any person who carries from place to place any goods, wares, or merchandise and offer to sell general merchandise of a perishable nature peddlers of ice, wood, or coal. Itinerant Merchant of Perishable Goods November 10, 2016 Fee for any person who transacts a business in a location for a period of than one year to sell goods of a perishable nature and merchants of ice, wood, or coal. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3729 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-55 Fee Effective Date Description Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums January 1, 1989 Annual license on every permanent coliseum, arena, and auditorium with the county having a maximum seating capacity of more than 10,000 persc and open to the general public. Shows and Sales License Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-52 Fee Effective Date Description Shows and Sales License January I, 1989 License per event of up to a three day period to conduct a show or sale the county. Solicitor Permit Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 19 Article I, Sections 19-1 to 19-8 Ordinance 84-194 Fee Effective Date Description Solicitor Permit November 13, 1984 Permit for person seeking to obtain orders for the purchase of goods, w merchandise, foodstuffs or services of any kind, character or description; prospective customers for purchase of insurance; obtain subscriptions to books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers, or other publications. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Wine, Beer, and Mixed Beverage Licenses Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 4.1 206.1-240 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-49 Fee Effective Date Description Wholesale Distributor - Beer January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer wholesale Wholesale Distributor - Wine January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine wholesale Wholesale Distributor - Beer and Wine January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine wholesale On premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer on premises. Off premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer off premises. On premises Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine on premises. Off premises Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine off premises. On premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine on premises. Off premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine off premises. On and Off premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer on and off premises. On and Off premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine on and off premises. Mixed Beverages and Beer On premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer on premises with seatin, capacity between 50 and 100 persons. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on premises wits seating capacity between 50 and 100 persons. Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On & Off premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on and off premi with seating capacity between 50 and 100 persons. Mixed Beverages and Beer On premises Sales License with seating between 101 and 150 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer on premises with seating capacity between 101 and 150 persons. Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating between 101 and 150 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on & off premise with seating capacity between 101 and 150 persons. Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating over 151 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on premises wits seating capacity over 151 persons Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On and Off premises Sales License with seating over 151 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on and off premi with seating capacity over 151 persons County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Private Club Beer on premises sales January I, 1989 Annual license for private clubs to sell beer on premises. Private Club Beer & Wine on and off premises sales January I, 1989 Annual license for private clubs to sell beer & wine on and off premises. Wine off premises sales and beer on premises sales January I, 1989 Annual license to sell wine off premises and beer on premises. Beer & Wine on premises sales and beer off premises sales January I, 1989 Annual license to sell beer & wine on premises and beer off premises. Mixed Beverages sales with seating between 10I - 150, beer & wine sales on premises, and beer off premises. January I, 1989 Annual license for mixed beverage sales with seating capacity between I( and 150 persons and to sell beer & wine on premises and to sell beer off premises. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Building and Trade Permit Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinances 092804-7 and 51022-12 Fee Effective Date Description Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $0 and $5,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu between $0 and $5,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $5,000 and $20,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu between $5,000 and $20,000. Permit fees are determined by calculat value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate vz Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $20,000 and $100,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu between $20,000 and $100,000. Permit fees are determined by calcu value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate v; Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $100,000 and $500,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu between $100,000 and $500,000. Permit fees are determined by calc value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate vz Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $500,000 and $1,000,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu between $500,000 and $1,000,000. Permit fees are determined by co a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Building Permit for structure with estimated value of over $1,000,000 September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated valu $1,000,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of cons as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. Trade permit fees with estimated value of $0 to $1,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of $0 to $1,000. Trade permit fees with estimated value of $1,000.01 to $2,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of $1,000.01 to $2,000. Trade permit fees with estimated value of $2,000.01 to $3,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of $2,000.01 to $3,000. Trade permit fees with estimated value of $3,000.01 to $4,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of $3,000.01 to $4,000. Trade permit fees with estimated value of $4,000.01 to $5,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of $4,000.01 to $5,000. Trade permit fees with estimated value of over $5,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structi with an estimated value of over $5,000 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Amusement Devices July I, 2022 Kiddie rides, circular rides or flat rides, etc. Cross connection July I, 2022 Any physical connection of arrangement between two otherwise sep2 piping system Miscellaneous September 28, 2004 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, reinspection, Elevator periodic inspection September 28, 2004 Process a submittal of Elevator Inspection results Cancellation of project or permit September 28, 2004 An administrative fee of 25% of the actual calculated permit fee will b withheld from any permit or application that is canceled, withdrawn c revoked before issuance of the permit or completion of the project. Pass-thru Fee to State of Virginia July I, 2018 Pass-thru Fee to State of Virginia (2% Charge on all Building, Plumbing Electrical, or Mechanical Permits) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Certificate of Occupancy Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 092804-7 Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary Commercial September 28, 2004 Permit request including but not limited to reinspection, temporary c of occupancies (commercial), etc. Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary Residential September 28, 2004 Permit request including reinspection temporary certificate of occupa (residential), etc. Certificate of Occupancy - Existing Building (Commercial) September 28, 2004 Permit request including inspection and reissuing of certificate of occ' etc. Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 052218-8 Certificate of Occupancy - Commercial July I, 2018 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, temporary ce of occupancies, etc. Certificate of Occupancy - Residential July I, 2018 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, temporary ce of occupancies, etc. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.I-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. Fee Effective Date Description Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July I, 2018 Any land disturbing activities of Tess than 5,000 SQ FT Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July I, 2018 Any land disturbing activities between 5,000 SQ FT and 9,999 SQ FT Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July I, 2018 Any land disturbing activities of 10,000 SQ FT or more Miscellaneous Development Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinances 052218-8 and 051022-10 Fee Effective Date Description Permit Renewal (Annual) July I, 2018 Second and subsequent renewals of annual permits (for erosion and s control, site plan and/or large subdivision development); there will be for the first twelve (12) month renewal of a permit). Technology Fee Fund July I, 2022 3% fee per any permit issuing fees. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Subdivision Review Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 2, Section 7-18; Chapter 7, Ordinance 61290-6. Fee Effective Date Description Small Subdivision Review (Less than 4 lots or parcels) June 12, 1990 Residential land subdivision of creating 4 or less parcels Resubmittal of Plans 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th June 12, 1990 Charges to review the plans following the second review due to chap presented by the owner or their engineer of record. Vacation of Plat & Easements June 1 2, 1 990 Vacating any old plat or removing any easements/right of way ti no longer needed to cloud property deed. Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. Fee Effective Date Description Site Plan Review July I, 2018 Any commercial construction plans or subdivision of any kind. Large Subdivision Review (5 or more Tots or parcels) July I, 2018 Residential land subdivision of creating 5 or more parcels. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Stormwater Management Permit Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia, Section 62.1-44.15:28 Virginia Water Control Board regulations 9VAC25-870-820, 9VAC25-870-825, 9VAC25 Ordinance 042214-12 Stormwater Management Ordinance Resolution 051314-2 Adopting Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Sched Fee Effective Date Description Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) • Single Family Residential 0 to 5 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc single-family detached residential structure within or outside commor development or sale with land disturbance acreage between 0 and 5 2 Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) • Small Construction Tess than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc construction activity/land clearing (areas within common plans of devl or sale with land -disturbance acreage Tess than 1 acre) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) • Small Construction between 1 and 5 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc construction activity/land clearing (areas within common plans of devi or sale with land -disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 acre than 5 acres) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) July I, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common F development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to or great( acres and less than 10 acres) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) • Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common F development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to or great( acres and less than 50 acres) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) Large Construction between 50 and 100 acres July I, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common F development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to or great( acres and less than 100 acres) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Contrc Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common F development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to or great( 100 acres) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) Small Construction Tess than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plat development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre) Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Small Construction between 1 and 5 acres July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within cam plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 1 and Tess than 5 acres) Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Large Construction between 5 and 10 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 5 acres and Tess than 10 acres) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 10 acres and Tess than 50 acres) Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Large Construction between 50 and 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 50 acres and Tess than 100 acres) Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Large Construction greater than 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 100 acres) Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) . Small construction Tess than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plat development or sale with land disturbance acreage Tess than 1 acre) e single family detached residential structures. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) Small construction between 1 and 5 acres %July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within corn plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 1 and Tess than 5 acres) Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) % Large construction between 5 and 10 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 5 acres and Tess than 10 acres) Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) • Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 10 acres and Tess than 50 acres) Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) % Large construction between 50 and 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within com plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 50 acres and Tess than 100 acres) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Development Services Fees Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) Large construction greater than 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within corn plans of development or sale, with land -disturbance acreage equal to greater than 100 acres) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Finance & Management Services Fees Payment In Lieu of Taxes Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3400 and 58.1-340 I Fee Effective Date Description Payment In Lieu of Taxes April 12, 2004 A service fee paid by entities that qualify for tax-exempt status as define( the Commonwealth of Virginia. The fee is used by Roanoke County to c costs associated with providing services to tax-exempt entities. Each payment in lieu of tax for each entity must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Fire and Rescue Fees Ambulance Fees Legislative Authorization County of Roanoke, Virginia Resolution 051022-3 Fee Effective Date Description Ambulance Service Fee Basic Life Support July 1, 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level medical care which is used for victims of life -threatening illnesses or injur until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 1 July 1, 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level medical care which is used for victims of life -threatening illnesses or injur with the provision of an Advanced Life Support assessment or at least or Advanced Life Support intervention until they can be given full medical cz at a hospital. Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 2 July I, 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level medical care which is used for victims of life -threatening illnesses or injur with the provision of more intervention than that of Advanced Life Supp until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. Ambulance Service Fee Rescue Vehicle Mileage July 1, 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle per mile. Fire Marshall Permits and Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 9, Article II, Section 9-10, Article III, Section 9- Ordinance 52488 Fee Effective Date Description Amusement Building Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the operation of an amusement building per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Fire and Rescue Fees Carnival and Fair Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the operation of a carnival or fair per event. The fire marshal issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Combustible Dust - Producing Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses which produce combustible dust during fac operations. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provi of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Compressed Gas Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the use of compressed gas per event. The fire marshal shall i5 all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Covered Mall Building Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for enclosed malls and shopping centers for alarm and fire suppression systems. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Cutting, Welding, and Hot Work Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for welding, cutting, and hot work per event or job. The fire mar shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewid( Prevention Code. Exhibit and Trade Show Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for exhibit or trade show per event. The fire marshal shall issue permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevent Code. Explosives Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for any blasting work per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevent Code. Flammable and Combustible Liquids May 24, 1988 Permit for the storage of and/or removal of a tank per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Fire and Rescue Fees Floor Finishing Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for using chemicals to finish floors per event. The fire marshal sh issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Fruit and Crop Ripening Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses where ethylene gas is introduced into a roc to promote the ripening of fruits, vegetables, and other crops. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Fumigation and Thermal Insecticidal Fogging Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for professional fumigation, thermal, or fogging pesticide use per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Hazardous Materials Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses storing or using hazardous materials. The 1 marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Liquid or Gas Fuel Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for use of liquid or gas fuel vehicles or equipment in buildings dur assembly per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to t provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Open Burning Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for burning materials in open area. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevent Code. Open Flames and Candles Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for flames or candles in open area. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevent Code. Private Fire Hydrant Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for a private fire hydrant. Permit is per hydrant. The fire marsha shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewid( Prevention Code. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Fire and Rescue Fees Pyrotechnic Special Effects Material Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the use of pyrotechnic special effects materials per event. Th marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Storage of Scrap Tires and Tire By -Products Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for the storage of scrap tires and tire by-products. The fi marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Temporary Membrane, Structure, Tent, and Canopy Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the use of a temporary membrane, structure, tent, or canopy event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Waste Handling Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses or individuals to handle waste. The fire ma shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewid( Prevention Code. Place of Assembly Occupancy Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for any business where people may assemble including restaurant theaters, etc... The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Storage of Explosives May 24, 1988 Annual permit per magazine to store explosives. The fire marshal shall i! all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium General Services - Solid Waste Fees Bear Container Retrofits Fee Legislative Authorization Fee set administratively by the Director of General Services Fee Effective Date Description Bear Container Retrofits January 1, 2014 Fee to retrofit existing automated collection containers with device to m them bear resistant. Non -Resident and Premium Solid Waste Collection Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 20, Article 11, Section 20-24. Ordinance 012704-3 Fee Effective Date Description Non -County Resident Waste Collection Fee January 27, 2004 Monthly waste collection fee for Non -County Residents Non -County Resident Container Rental Fee January 27, 2004 Monthly container rental fee for Non -County Residents Premium Waste Collection Fee January 27, 2004 Application fee for optional backyard services may be available to resider customers for household waste. Premium Waste Collection Fee for first 100 feet from Curb January 27, 2004 Optional backyard collection service for first 100 feet from Curb Premium Waste Collection Fee for each additional 100 feet from Curb January 27, 2004 Optional backyard collection service for each additional 100 feet or fract thereof from Curb Container Replacement Fee January 27, 2004 Fee to replace an automated collection container. Per County Code Chapter 20, Article 11, Section 20-24, b: The replacement fee for a conta shall be established by the solid waste manager subject to the approval of county administrator. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Library Fees Library Facility and Rental Fees Legislative Authorization Resolution 12131 1-1 allows the Library Director to establish fees for the use of Library me, upon recommendations from the Library Board and Approval by the County Administrator Fee Effective Date Description South County Library Auditorium and Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental July 1, 2019 Fee to rent the Auditorium with Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 at South Cou Library. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled. South County Library Auditorium July I, 2019 Fee to rent the Auditorium at South County Library. After hours rate South County Library is doubled. South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 or 2 Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 or 2 at South County Library community groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubt South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 or 2 Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 or 2 at South County Library commercial groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubt South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 South County Library community groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubt( South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 South County Library commercial groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubt, South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 at South County Library parties. Must rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup 1 hour cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Library Fees South County Library Business Office 1/2 Day Rental July 1, 2019 Rental fee for the Business office at South County Library for 1/2 day (u 4 hours). South County Library Business Office Full Day Rental July 1, 2019 Rental fee for the Business office at South County Library for full day (o, hours). Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library by commun groups. Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library by commerc groups. Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library for parties. I` rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 houi cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Community) July I, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library by communi groups. Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library by commerc groups. Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library for parties. N rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 houi cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Conference Room (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by commur groups. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Library Fees Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Conference Room (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by commer groups. Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Projector Rental July 1, 2019 Hourly rate to rent a projector for use in a meeting room at Hollins Lib Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library by communi groups. Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Commercial) July I, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library by commerc groups. Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library for parties. N rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 houi cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. Vinton Library Conference Room Fee (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Vinton Library by commur groups. Vinton Library Conference Room Fee (Commercial) Julyl, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by commer groups. Computer Lab Room Fee All Locations Julyl, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of computer lab at all locations. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Library Fees Library Material Fines and Services Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-5. Ordinance 0525 10- 12 Fee Effective Date Description Library Material Fee - Replacement of Library Card July I, 2010 $1 charge for a replacement library card. A person shall be denied Iibrar privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or mor items are overdue. Library Material Fee - Lost Materials July I, 2010 Cost varies per item. A $5 service fee is charged in addition to the replacement cost of the item. A person shall be denied library privileges $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. Library Material Fee - Damaged Materials July I, 2010 Repair cost up to replacement cost per item. A person shall be denied Iil privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or mor items are overdue. Library Service Fee - Copies April 3, 2017 Fee, per page, for photocopy services. Library Service Fee - Printing or Copying (Black and White) July I, 2010 Fee, per page, for printing or copying black and white pages on public lib' printers. Library Service Fee - Printing or Copying (Color) July I, 2010 Fee, per page, for printing or copying color pages on public library printe County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Library Fees Library Service Fee - Interlibrary Loan July 1, 2010 Lender library fee, if applicable, plus postage cost per item. A person sha denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued c 25 or more items are overdue. Library Service Fee - Local Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for local service. Library Service Fee - Long Distance Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for long distance service. Library Service Fee - International Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for international service. Passport Fees Legislative Authorization 22 U.S. Code 214 - Fees for Execution and Issuance of Passports Fee Effective Date Description Passport Execution Fee April 2, 2018 Cost per passport application processed at South County Library. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Planning Fees Planning & Zoning Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 2, Section 7-18; Chapter 7, Ordinance 61290-6. Fee Effective Date Description Subdivision Waiver or Variance June 12, 1990 Any request to review variances or wave certain requirement in resit commercial subdivision due to hardship Zoning Variance June 12, 1990 Application to Board of Zoning Appeals to get relief from zoning rem due to hardship Administrative Appeal June 12, 1990 Application to Board of Zoning Appeals to appeal the Zoning Admini! decision on a zoning matter Land Use Plan Amendment June 12, 1990 Application to amend the County's Future Land Use Plan Map Rezoning: Agricultural/Single Family Residence June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for agricultural uses or for single fami (A- I , RE, R- I ) Rezoning: Multi -Family June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for multi -family housing (R-2, R-3, R-2 MH, R-6) Rezoning: Industrial June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for industrial uses (B-1, B-2, B-3) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Planning Fees Rezoning: Commercial June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for commercial uses Special Use Permit Fee Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinances 061290-6 and 052218-8. Fee Effective Date Description Special Use Permit July I, 2018 Application for a use that is listed as a special use within a particular z district Special Use/Landfill June 12, 1990 Application for a special use permit for a land fill County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Planning Fees Weed and Trash Abatement Penalty Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 13, Sections 13-151 through 13-159 Ordinances 052609-9 and 1 1 1213-16 Fee Effective Date Description Weed Abatement Penalty - First Violation November 12, 2013 First penalty for weeds or grass higher than twelve inches in height w feet of property developed for residential use. Weed Abatement Penalty - Subsequent Violations November 12, 2013 Subsequent penalty within a twelve month period for weeds or grass than twelve inches in height within 250 feet of property developed fo residential use. Trash Abatement Penalty - First Violation November 12, 2013 First penalty for the accumulation of trash on any parcel or property. Trash Abatement Penalty - Subsequent Violations November 12, 2013 Subsequent penalty within a twelve month period for accumulation of any parcel or property. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Planning Fees Zoning Verification Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. Fee Effective Date Description Zoning Verification Letter July 1, 2018 Fee for any verification of zoning required on site or property. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Adult Business Permit Fee Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 13, Article III, Section 13-101 Ordinance 102505-8 Fee Effective Date Description Adult Business Permit Fee October 25, 2005 Permit required by the Chief of Police to run an Adult Business Animal Boarding Services Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 and 5-29 Ordinances 012699-14 and 120506-2 Fee Effective Date Description Daily Boarding Fee for dog, cat, companion animal or other domestic animal January 26, 1999 Daily Boarding fee for any dog, cat, companion animal or other domestic animal for up to five days if identity cannot be verified and up to ten days animals whose identity can be verified before adoption or disposal. Pickup fee for first offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the first violation of Coc of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 through 5-28. Pickup fee for second offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the second violation of Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Section: 23 through 5-28. Pickup fee for third offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the third violation of Cc of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 through 5-28. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Concealed Handgun Permit Legislative Authorization Roanoke County Resolution 092419-1 Code of Virginia § 18.2-308.03 Fee Effective Date Description Concealed Handgun Permit July 1, 2020 Fee for a original or renewal permit to carry a handgun or other firearm concealed fashion for a five year period. Criminal Justice Academy Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 16.1-69.48:1, 17.1-275.2, 17.1-275.3, 17.1-275.4, 17.1-275.7, 17.1-275.8, an Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 2-10 Ordinance 062210-5 Fee Effective Date Description Criminal Justice Academy Fees June 22, 2010 Fee of $5 in every criminal or traffic case in which costs are assessable to support the County's criminal justice training academy County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems License Fee Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16.1, Article III, Section 16.1-31 Ordinance 081 1 15-3 Fee Effective Date Description License for Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems August 11, 2015 Annual License For Dealer Of Precious Metals & Gems False Alarm Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article VIII, Section 16-26 Ordinance 1 1 1991-12 Fee Effective Date Description False Alarm Fee for less than 4 dispatches per year November 19, 1991 Users of alarm services shall be allowed 4 false alarms, without fees, in an calendar year. False Alarm Fee for 5th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 5th dispatch within one calendar year. False Alarm Fee for 6th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 6th dispatch within one calendar year. False Alarm Fee for 7th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 7th dispatch within one calendar year. False Alarm Fee for 8th and subsequent dispatches November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 8th and subsequent dispatches within one calendar year. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Alarm inspection failure November 19, 1991 Following a fourth false alarm within one calendar year, users will be notii by the Police Department within thirty days of the fourth false alarm that alarm system inspection is required. An inspection must be completed within thirty days of the receipt of notice from the alarm system compan; Failure to return the completed inspection form to the Police Departmer within this thirty day period with result in a $100 Administrative fee. Fingerprinting Fee Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article IV, Section 16-1 I Ordinance 62690-10 Fee Effective Date Description Fingerprinting Fee June 26, 1990 Fingerprinting Fee (Per Fingerprint Card) for any individual. Fee does not apply when at the request of another law -enforcement agency or authori; representative of the armed forces of the United States or the Commonwealth. The chief of police is authorized to waive this fee in connection with the fingerprinting of minors conducted by the departmer connection with any public service project or promotion. Mopeds Traffic Violations Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12-137 Ordinance 121 1 12-6 Fee Effective Date Description Mopeds Traffic Violations December I I , 2012 Fine for safety violations for any moped which has an operating speed bel 35 miles per hour. A moped shall be considered a motorcycle when operated at speeds in excess of 35 miles per hour. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Parade Fees Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 14, Article II, Section 14-23 Ordinance 2993-4 Fee Effective Date Description Parade Permit Fee February 2, 1993 Fee for the processing of an application for a parade permit. The chief of police may waive the fee if the parade is to be conducted on behalf of a nonprofit or charitable organization. Not applicable to the Town of Vinti Parade Expenses February 2, 1993 Classes of parades may be established by the chief of police to determine ordinary costs of providing traffic control and other normal administrative costs to the county based upon the time, place, and manner of parades. Parking Tickets Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 12, Article III, Division I, Section 12-51 Chapter 12-54 and 12-54.1 Ordinance 022498- I 0 Fee Effective Date Description Parking Tickets - Double Parking February 24, 1998 Double parking ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Parking Over Allowed Time February 24, 1998 Parking over allowed time ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Unattended Motor in Operation February 24, 1998 Unattended motor in operation ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Parking Tickets - Tractor Semi-Trailer/Recreational Vehicle in Residential Area February 24, 1998 Tractor semi-trailer/recreational vehicle/boat in residential area ($5 penal not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Blocking Traffic February 24, 1998 Blocking traffic ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Parking in a Designated Space on County Property February 24, 1998 Parking in a designated space on county property ($5 penalty if not paid ii days) Parking Tickets - Parking within 500 feet of Accident or Area of Emergency February 24, 1998 Parking within 500 feet of accident or area of emergency ($5 penalty if nc paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Other Violations February 24, 1998 Any other violation ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Parking in Fire Lane or within 15 feet of Hydrant or Fire & Rescue Building February 24, 1998 Parking in fire lane, within 15 feet of hydrant or fire & rescue building ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Parking in areas labeled as "No Parking" February 26, 1991 Parking in a no -parking zone ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Parking Tickets - Parking within 20 Feet of an Intersection February 24, 1998 Parking within 20 feet of an intersection ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Parking Tickets - Parking in Area Designated as Handicapped without proper license plates or placards. February 24, 1998 Parking in area designated as handicapped without proper license plates c placards ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days) Police E-Citation Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 17.1-279. I Ordinance 052218-9 Fee Effective Date Description Police E-Citation Fee July 1, 2018 A $5 fee assessed as part of the costs of each convicted or pre -payable criminal or traffic offense in the Roanoke County district and circuit cour used to fund software, hardware, and associated equipment costs for the implementation and maintenance of electronic summons (E-Citation) syst County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Police Fees Sale of Records of Arrests, Offenses and Traffic Accident Reports Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article IV, Section 16-10 and 16-12 Ordinance 62690-10 Fee Effective Date Description Sale of Records of Arrests and Offenses June 26, 1990 Police Department may charge a fee of $10 to defray the administrative c of searching for and providing any records of arrests and offenses. Traffic Accident Report Requests June 26, 1990 Police Department may charge a fee of $10 to defray the administrative c of searching for and providing any records of accident reports. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Recreation Fees, Membership Fees, and Rentals Legislative Authorization Ordinance 92794-1 1 Authorizes Parks, Recreation & Tourism Director to establish and cha Fee Effective Date Description Advertising Rates - Recreation Magazine January 1, 2017 Advertising Rates for Roanoke County Recreation Magazine. Rates vary, After Hours Splash Valley and Green Ridge Rentals January 1, 2017 After hours rentals for Splash Valley and Green Ridge facilities After School for Kids (ASK) July I, 2019 Bi-Monthly Program Rate for ASK program. $145 bi-monthly for one ch $135 bi-monthly for each additional child. Athletics Camps July 1, 2019 Athletics Camps Athletic Field Rental Rate - 100% County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - 100% County Residents per 2 hour block Athletic Field Rental Rate - 50% or more County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - 50% or more County Residents per 2 hour b Athletic Field Rental Rate - Less than 50% County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - Less than 50% County Residents per 2 hour block Brambleton Center Rentals July 1, 2019 Brambleton Center Room Rental Rates County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Camp Director's Cabin Rental Payment - Camp Roanoke January 1, 2012 Camp Director's Cabin Rental Payment at Camp Roanoke per month. Catawba Recreation Center Rentals January 1, 2000 Per hour cost for Catawba Recreation Center rentals. Cooking Classes Various Cooking Classes - 1-6 week sessions Crafts Classes Various Crafts Classes - 1-6 week sessions Dog Training Classes Various Dog Training Classes - 4-6 week sessions Drawing/Painting Classes Various Drawing/Painting Classes - 1-6 week sessions Educational/ Instructional Classes Various Educational/ Instructional Classes - 1-4 week sessions Equestrian Center Membership Various Equestrian Center Membership cost per year. Explore Park Building or Outdoor Space Weddings and Other Rentals January 1, 2014 Explore Park Building or Outdoor Space Weddings and Other Rentals Explore Park Room Rental - Taubman Upper Floor January 1, 2014 Per hour rental fee for the upper floor of the Arthur Taubman Center ai Explore Park. Explore Park In -House Camps July 1, 2019 Explore Park In -House Camps Explore Park Paddling Camp July 1, 2019 Explore Park Paddling Camp County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Explore Park Mountain Biking Camp July 1, 2019 Explore Park Mountain Biking Camp Full Day Summer Camps November 1, 2018 Full Day Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included. Green Ridge Daily Admission - County Resident January 1, 2010 Green Ridge Daily Admission for County Residents Green Ridge Daily Admission - Non -County Resident July 1, 2018 Green Ridge Daily Admission for Non -County Residents Green Ridge Membership .July County Resident I, 2018 Green Ridge Membership for County Residents including access to gymnasiums, wellness facility, indoor pool, and access to exercise classes. Green Ridge Membership . Non -County Resident July I, 2018 Green Ridge Membership for Non -County Residents including access to gymnasiums, wellness facility, indoor pool, and access to exercise classes. Green Ridge Pool Party Rentals July 1, 2016 Green Ridge pool party rentals per event Green Ridge Room Rentals July 1, 2016 Per hour fee for room rentals at Green Ridge Recreation Center Group Swimming Lessons at Green Ridge January 1, 2015 Group Swimming Lessons at Green Ridge - 4-6 week sessions Half Day Summer Camps November 2, 2018 Half Day Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included. Hobby Classes Various Hobby Classes - 1-6 week sessions Lifeguard Training Classes January 1, 2015 Per class fee for Lifeguard Training Classes. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Lose Big Wellness Class July 1, 2018 Lose Big Wellness Class - 12 week sessions Martial Arts Classes Various Martial Arts Classes - 1-6 week sessions Music & Dance Classes Various Music & Dance Classes - 1-6 week sessions My Fit Class July 1, 2020 My Fit nutrition and fitness class Online Cooking Series July 1, 2020 Cost for all ages for online cooking classes Outdoor Hikes/Environmental Education Programs Various Outdoor Hikes/Environmental Education Programs. Costs vary by progr Outdoor Trips and Excursions Various Parks, Recreation and Tourism provides opportunities for various outdo trips and excursions. Costs vary between $40 and $250 per trip or excursion. Overnight Summer Camps November 1, 2017 Overnight Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included. Park Flyers Membership Various Park Flyers Membership for remote controlled model flying machines. C vary by programs included. Per event cost for Camp Roanoke Custom Outdoor Experiences January 1, 2016 Designed for groups interested in environmental education, team buildin, guided outdoor experiences Per event cost for Camp Roanoke Lodge, Ropes Course and Pavilion Rentals. Cost varies by facility. January 1, 2007 Kiwanis Lodge, Nature Cabin, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Pavilion Rentals County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Personal Training at Green Ridge July I, 2018 Hourly Rate for Personal Training at Green Ridge Picnic Shelter Rentals January 1, 2015 Picnic shelter rental costs vary based on number of guests Pottery/Ceramics Classes September 1, 2014 Pottery/Ceramics Classes - 1-8 week sessions, including firing fees Prepared Food/Concessions Items at Splash Valley Various Prepared Food/Concessions Items at Splash Valley. Costs vary per item Preschool Camps July 1, 2019 Preschool camps (does not include Camp Roanoke) Private Swimming Lessons at Green Ridge October 1, 2017 Private swim lessons at Green Ridge Retail Sales Items at Explore Park Gift Shop, Green Ridge & Splash Valley Various Retail Sales Items at Explore Park Gift Shop, Green Ridge & Splash Valle} Costs vary per item. Senior Van/Bus Excursions Various Van/Bus Excursions for Senior Citizens. Costs vary by program. Snow Day and School's Out Child Care Programs Various Fee for child care programs on snow days and other days during the sch( year when schools are closed. Splash Valley - Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) Splash Valley - Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Splash Valley - Non - Resident/Ages 55 and up July I, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Ages 55 and up Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) Splash Valley - Non - Resident/Ages 55 and up July I, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Ages 55 and up Splash Valley Concessions July 1, 2019 Splash Valley Concessions Splash Valley Season Pass July 1, 2019 Splash Valley Season Pass Treetop Quest Daily Pass July 1, 2019 Full Day Pass for Treetop Quest at Explore Park Treetop Quest Season Pass July I, 2019 Season Pass for Treetop Quest at Explore Park Wellness/Fitness Program July 1, 2019 Wellness/Fitness Program Wellness/Group Exercise Classes Various Wellness/Group Exercise Classes - 1-6 week sessions County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Public Information Fees Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Charges Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 2.2-3700 through 2.2-3714 Resolution 060821-2 Fee Effective Date Description Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests June, 8 2021 Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or Tess. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - black and white copies June, 8 2021 Records printed in black and white. Roanoke County waives all charges requests that total $5.00 or Tess. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - color copies June, 8 2021 Records printed in color. Roanoke County waives all charges for reques that total $5.00 or Tess. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - audio or CDs June, 8 2021 FOIA request for audio or cdS. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or Tess. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - 24 by 36 inch maps June, 8 2021 FOIA request for map records formatted to 24 by 36 inches. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or Tess. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Public Information Fees Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - 36 by 48 inch maps June, 8 2021 FOIA request for map recrds formatted to 36 by 48 inches. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) time - County personnel hourly rate June, 8 2021 FOIA request requiring staff time to complete. Cost varies by staff requi to complete the request. Roanoke County waives all charges for reques that total $5.00 or less. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Public Transportation (CORTRAN) Fees CORTRAN Fee Per Trip Legislative Authorization Ordinance 052819-4 Budget Ordinance Adopting FY 2020 Budget and all Fee Changes Resolution 052819-1 Adopting a Fee Compendium Fee Effective Date Description CORTRAN fee per trip July 1, 2019 CORTRAN provides public demand response transportation to qualified residents of Roanoke County. Charge of $5 is for each one-way trip. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Real Estate Valuation Fees Land Use Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia: Title 58.1, Chapter 32, Article 4 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 21, Article 3, Sections 21-51 through 21 County of Roanoke, Virginia Ordinance Number 091499-8 Fee Effective Date Description Land Use Fee Initial Enrollment Fee September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of Ian while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke Count} For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are require after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. Land Use Fee Additional Fee Per Acre September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of Ian while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke Count} For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are require after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. Land Use Fee Renewal Fee Every 6th year September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of Ian while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke Count} For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are require after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Real Estate Valuation Fees Land Use Fee Renewal Fee Per Additional Acre September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of lane while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke Count} For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are require after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. Land Use Fee Late Filing Penalty September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of lane while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke Count} For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are require after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Sheriff and Jail Fees Board of Prisoners - Salem Legislative Authorization Agreement between the City of Salem and Roanoke County Fee Effective Date Description Board of Prisoners - Salem July 1, 2019 Daily fee charged to the City of Salem, Virginia to board prisoners from jurisdiction in the Roanoke County Jail. Canteen Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-127.1 Fee Effective Date Description Canteen Fees March 5, 2013 The Sheriff may establish a canteen or store for inmates to purchase cer goods and food. Revenue from these fees must be used for educational, recreational, or other purposes for the benefit of the inmates. Daily Jail Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-131.3 Fee Effective Date Description Daily Jail Fees April 11, 2010 Daily fee charged to inmates to offset jail costs. Revenue must be used i jail or sheriff purposes. Indigent inmates with no ability to pay are not charged. Per state code, fee is not to exceed $3 per day. Fingerprint Cards Legislative Authorization Sheriff's Office bases charge on the local average cost of service Fee Effective Date Description Finger Print Cards Provide authorized finger print cards for individuals requesting official fin print cards. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Sheriff and Jail Fees Home Electronic Monitoring Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-13 1.2 Fee Effective Date Description Home Electronic Monitoring April 6, 2020 Fees for home electronic monitoring equipment Medical Costs Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-32 Fee Effective Date Description Medical Costs April 18, 2012 Inmates requiring medical care while in confinement may be charged for portion of the care provided. Indigent inmates with no ability to pay car be denied care. Process Service Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 17.1-272 Fee Effective Date Description In State Process Service March 21, 2019 Fee for process and service for instate residents Out of State Process Service March 21, 2019 Fee for process and service for out of state residents County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Sheriff and Jail Fees Sobrieter Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-131.2 Fee Effective Date Description Sobrieter Fee April 6, 2020 Fee for sobrieter device to be installed on home telephone for post trial offenders Weekender Jail Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 53.1-13 1.1 Fee Effective Date Description Weekender Jail Fees April 6, 2006 Fee for inmates sentenced with the option of serving sentence on non- consecutive days during weekends. State code allows charges to be up t the actual cost of incarceration but shall not exceed the amount charged the Compensation Board for purposes of reimbursement. Drug Test Fee April 6, 2006 Fee for drug test kit for inmates sentenced with the option of serving sentence on non-consecutive days during weekends. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Social Services Fees Custody Investigations/Home Studies Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 16.1-274 Fee Effective Date Description Custody Investigations/Home Studies March 30, 2012 Fee for conducting a home study for individuals seeking custody of a chill Fee based on income to a maximum of $300. Amount established by appropriate Board of Social Services. Guardianship Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 64.2-2020 Fee Effective Date Description Guardianship fee March 6, 2013 Fee for processing the annual Guardianship Report required for court appointed guardians of incapacitated persons. Home Study for Parental Placement Adoptions Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia 63.2-1248 Fee Effective Date Description Home Study for parental placement adoptions April 7, 2002 Fee for conducting a home study for individuals adopting a child through parental placement. Amount established by appropriate Board of Social Services. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Treasurer Fees Animal Control - Cat Tags Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 3.2-6528 County Code Chapter 5, Article II, Div. 2, Sec. 5-44 Fee Effective Date Description Cat Tag, 1 year July 26, 2005 One year license for cats of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per cat and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination Cat Tag, 3 year July 26, 2005 Three year license for cats of owners who reside within Roanoke Count Fees are per cat and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination Animal Control - Dog Tags Legislative Authorization Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: (Chapter 5, Article 2, Divisions 1 - 2). Ordinance No. 042313-7. Fee Effective Date Description Dog Tag, 1 Year April 23, 2013 License for dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees ar per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. Limit c dogs per dwelling without a multiple dog permit. Dog Tag, 3 year April 23, 2013 License for dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees ar per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. Limit c dogs per dwelling without a multiple dog permit. Multiple Dog permit, up to 20 April 23, 2013 License for up to 20 dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccinatioi County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Treasurer Fees Multiple Dog permit, up to 50 April 23, 2013 License for up to 50 dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccinatioi Animal Control - Dangerous Dogs Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 3.2-6540 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 5, Article II, Division 2 , § 5.44 Ordinance No. 072605-7. Dangerous Dog Ordinance No. 092413-6 Fee Effective Date Description Dangerous Dog July 26, 2005 If a dog is legally declared a dangerous dog by any General District Cour Circuit Court in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the license fee is initially $150, then $85 to update and renew. Collection Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3958 County Code Chapter 21, Article 1, Sec. 21-8 Ordinance No. 72891-10 Fee Effective Date Description Collection Fee July 28, 1992 Collection fee to cover the administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. Fee is $20 for taxes collected prior to judgment and $25 for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. Code of Virginia allows $30 before judgment and $35 after judgment. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Treasurer Fees Debt Set -Off Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-520 through 58.1-535 Fee Effective Date Description Debt Set -Off Fee March 10, 2015 Fee for the collection of delinquent taxes or fees owed to the County through the Virginia Department of Taxation. Delinquent taxes or fees i be withheld from Virginia income tax refunds. (Virginia Department of Taxation can deduct up to 25% up to $25 as cost offset). Judicial Tax Sale Fees Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 58.1-3965 Fee Effective Date Description Judicial Tax Sale Fees March 10, 2015 Judicial tax sales may be held on properties which have delinquent taxes or after December 31 following the second anniversary on which such to have become due. Fees for conducting the sale including advertising fees attorney fees, fees for title search, and any administrative fees may be charged as a part of the sale. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Treasurer Fees Returned Check Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 15.2-106 County Code Chapter 2, Article 1, Sec. 2-3 Ordinance No. 092209-4 Fee Effective Date Description Returned Check Fee September 22, 2009 Any check returned to the County due to insufficient funds in the accoui was drawn on or if such account does not exist, a charge of $35 will app Code of Virginia allows up to $50. Vehicle License Fee Legislative Authorization Code of Virginia § 46.2-752 County Code Chapter 12, Article 2, Sec. 12-29 Ordinance No. 031009-9 Fee Effective Date Description Vehicle License Fee - General Vehicles Tess than 4,000 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for general vehicles weighing Tess than 4,000 pounds Vehicle License Fee - General Vehicles more than 4,001 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for general vehicles weighing more than 4,001 pounds Vehicle License Fee - Antique Vehicles January 1, 2009 One-time fee for vehicles registered as an antique vehicle with the Virgin DMV. No additional fees are due as long as antique vehicle registration i maintained. Vehicle License Fee - Boat Trailers January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for boat trailers County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium Treasurer Fees Vehicle License Fee - Farm Use Vehicles January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for vehicles registered for farm use Vehicle License Fee - Motorcycles January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for motorcycles Vehicle License Fee - Trailers less than 1,500 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing less than 1,500 pounds Vehicle License Fee - Trailers between 1,501 and 4,000 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing between 1,501 and 4,000 pounds Vehicle License Fee - Trailers over 4,001 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing more than 4,001 pounds County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - 2024 Fee Compendium AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION ADOPTING 1) THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA AND ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND 2) THE FISCAL YEARS 2024-2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA AND ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND 3) THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 FEE COMPENDIUM WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2503 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, provides that the governing body of the County shall prepare and approve an annual budget; and WHEREAS, said budget shall be prepared and approved for informative and fiscal planning purposes only; and WHEREAS, this budget contains a complete itemized and classified plan of all contemplated expenditures and all estimated revenues and borrowings for the ensuing fiscal year; and WHEREAS, a brief synopsis of said budget was published as required by the provisions of Section 15.2-2506 of the State Code, and the public hearings as required thereon were held on April 25, 2023 and May 9, 2023. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That there is hereby approved the annual operating and capital budget revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 2023-2024 for Roanoke County, Virginia, and Roanoke County Public Schools, as shown on the attached Schedules 1 and 2. Page 1 of 2 2. That there is hereby approved the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2024-2033 for Roanoke County, Virginia, and Roanoke County Public Schools, as shown on the attached Schedule 3. 3. That the preparation and approval of these budgets is for informative and fiscal planning purposes only. 4. That there is hereby approved a Fee Compendium which lists all fees and charges imposed by the County for providing specialized programs and services. The Fee Compendium provides details on the type of fee, authority to levy the fee, current fees, and proposed changes to the current fees. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinances to appropriate funds for: (a) Fiscal year 2023- 2024 operations budget and approval of the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024 for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (b) Fiscal year 2023-2024 capital budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and (c) Fiscal year 2023-2024 for Roanoke County Public Schools Categories SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Conduct second reading of three ordinances to appropriate funds for fiscal year 2023- 2024 County of Roanoke operating and capital budgets, Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) Categories, and approve the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024. BACKGROUND: The fiscal year 2023-2024 operating budget and the fiscal year 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) were presented to the Board of Supervisors on March 28, 2023. Since then, the operating budget has been revised to reflect the tax rates adopted at the Board meeting held on April 11, 2023. The revisions were reflected in the advertisements published in the Roanoke times on April 16, 2023 and April 30, 2023 and are reflected in the attached ordinance. Public hearings on the budget were held on April 25, 2023 and May 9, 2023, to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed fiscal year 2023- 2024 operating budget and the proposed fiscal year 2024-2033 Capital Improvement Program. Page 1 of 2 Attached for your approval are three budget appropriation ordinances for fiscal year 2023-2024 and the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024. In order to separate RCPS funding from County funding and more clearly distinguish the appropriations of the Board of Supervisors, County staff has divided the appropriation into three ordinances. Each ordinance will be voted on separately. DISCUSSION: The total County budget for fiscal year 2023-2024 is $612,081,615 which includes all inter -fund and intra-fund transfers and all Schools categories. The County General Government Fund totals $246.85 million and is appropriated as part of the County's operations ordinance. The budget is recommended to be appropriated in three separate budget ordinances. (a) The first budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $316,004,255 in fiscal year 2023-2024 for the County's operations budget. The ordinance also approves the County's Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024. (b) The second budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $15,137,628 in fiscal year 2023-2024 for the County's capital budget including the first year of the ten-year Capital Improvement Program. (c) The third budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $280,939,732 in fiscal year 2023-2024 for Roanoke County Public Schools categories. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the fiscal year 2023-2024 budget appropriation ordinances provides funding for County and Schools operations, transfers and capital budgets effective July 1, 2023. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the three fiscal year 2023-2024 budget appropriation ordinances. Staff also recommends approval of the attached Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023- 2024 OPERATIONS BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF THE CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 25, 2023 and May 9, 2023 concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2023-2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 9, 2023, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 1 of 7 County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2023-2024 County Operations First Reading May9, 2023; Second Reading May23, 2023 Revenues: General Fund - County: General Government Public Works Projects Fleet Service Center Communications & Information Technology Recreation Fee Class Children's Services Act Grants & Other Funds Parks, Recreation & Tourism - School Operations Police E-Citation Community Development Technology Fee Police Special Programs Criminal Justice Academy Subtotal, General Fund Debt Service Fund - from County Debt Service Fund - from Schools Subtotal, Debt Service Fund Internal Service Fund - Health Insurance Internal Service Fund - Dental Insurance Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Subtotal, Internal Service Funds Appropriation Amount $ 246,847,274 175,732 4,086,231 13, 952, 894 5,198, 646 7,948,166 2,024,936 418,291 60,000 40,000 2,500 454,152 281, 208, 822 14, 878, 894 4,125, 345 19,004,239 13, 365, 987 821,204 1,604,003 15, 791,194 Total Revenue - County Operations Funds $ 316,004,255 Expenditures: General Government - County Operations: General Administration Board of Supervisors $ 496,434 County Administration 1,059,288 Internal Auditor 194,520 Public Information 344,133 County Attorney 752,968 Human Resources 1,130,173 Subtotal, General Administration 3,977,516 Constitutional Officers Commissioner of the Revenue 1,054,580 Commonwealth's Attorney 1,567,615 Sheriffs Office 14,951,433 Treasurer 1,260,683 Clerk of the Circuit Court 1,363,258 Subtotal, Constitutional Officers 20,197,569 Page 2 of 7 Appropriation Amount Judicial Administration Circuit Court $ 257,068 General District Court 103,440 Magistrate 1,590 Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court 39,086 Court Service Unit 670,144 Courthouse Maintenance 60,000 Subtotal, Judicial Administration 1,131,328 Management Services Real Estate Valuation (Assessor) Finance & Management Services Subtotal, Management Services 1,057,944 2,831,811 3,889,755 Public Safety Police 17,152,104 Fire & Rescue 23,049,523 Subtotal, Public Safety 40,201,627 Community Services Economic Development 590,862 Development Services 3,838,282 Planning 2,384,396 General Services 9,549,321 Subtotal, Community Services 16,362,861 Human Services Parks, Recreation, & Tourism 5,838,532 Public Health 579,181 Social Services 14,560,683 Library 4,865,913 Virginia Cooperative Extension 115,391 Elections (Registrar) 878,412 Subtotal, Human Services 26,838,112 Non -Departmental Employee Benefits 2,458,302 Transfer to Communications & Information Technology 11,908,477 Contributions - Discretionary, Contractual, Dues & Memberships 2,480,357 Miscellaneous 1,646,411 Board Contingency 50,000 General Government Expenditure Contingency 608,162 Addition to Fund Balance 2,974,113 Subtotal, Non -Departmental 22,125,822 Page 3 of 7 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to School Operating Fund Transfer to Debt Service - County & Schools Transfer to County Capital Transfer to Children's Services Act - County Transfer to Children's Services Act - Schools Transfer to Internal Services - Risk Management Transfer to Criminal Justice Academy Transfer to Public Works Projects Subtotal, Transfers to Other Funds Appropriation Amount $ 86,782,060 14, 705, 700 4,280,046 1,934,000 1,879,000 2,154,003 212,143 175,732 112,122, 684 Total, General Government - County Operations $ 246,847,274 Public Works Projects $ 175,732 Fleet Service Center 4,086,231 Communications & Information Technology 13,952,894 Recreation Fee Class 5,198,646 Children's Services Act 7,948,166 Grants & Other Funds 2,024,936 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - School Operations 418,291 Police E-Citation 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee 40,000 Police Special Programs 2,500 Criminal Justice Academy 454,152 Total, General Fund - County Operations 281,208,822 Debt Service Fund 19,004,239 Internal Service Fund - Health Insurance Internal Service Fund - Dental Insurance Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Total, Internal Service Funds 13, 365, 987 821,204 1,604,003 15, 791,194 Total Expenditures - All County Operations Funds $ 316,004,255 Page 4 of 7 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another. 3. That all funded outstanding operating encumbrances at June 30, 2023, are re - appropriated to the 2023-2024 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That all General Government Fund unexpended appropriations and all General Government revenues collected in excess of appropriated revenues at the end of any fiscal year not lapse but shall be re -appropriated and presented to the Board of Supervisors for allocation based on guidance provided in Section 10- 1 through 5 of the County of Roanoke Comprehensive Financial Policy as approved by the Board of Supervisors. 5. Account balances remaining in the Fee Class Fund collected by the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department will be allocated to accounts as defined by the Fee Class Accounts Procedure. 6. Account balances remaining in Children's Services Act (C111), Police Confiscated Property (C120), Police Special Programs (C121), Forfeited Asset Sharing (C122), Sheriff Confiscated Property (C123), Sheriff Jail Fees (C124), Inventory Accounts (C125), Criminal Justice Academy (C126), Police Training Facility (C127), Garage - Fleet Service Center (C130), Motor Pool (C132), Grants (C135), Opioid Abatement Settlement Fund (C136), Communications and Information Technology (C141-C144), Fee Class (C150), PRT Schools Ground Maintenance (C151), Public Works Fund (C170), South Peak Page 5 of 7 Community Development Authority (C201), County Debt Fund (C310, C320, C330, C340, C360, C365, C375), County Capital and Economic Development Funds (C420, C421, C425, C428, C440, C445, C451, C455, C475), County Trust Funds (C501, C502), Internal Service Funds (C700, C705, C710), Special Welfare (C810), Regional Fire/Rescue Training Center (C814), Commonwealth Fund (C815), and Economic Development Authority (C818) funds will carry over 100% and be re -appropriated to the individual funds. 7. That the Board of Supervisors anticipates receiving various grants, donations, and other miscellaneous revenues. These anticipated funds are appropriated to the Grants Fund for the various functions and purposes as provided therein, and said appropriation shall be acknowledged and allocated to the appropriate fund upon approval by the Board of Supervisors on the Consent Agenda. 8. That the Board of Supervisors approves the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan. The Classification and Pay Plan included as part of this ordinance is effective July 1, 2023. The County Administrator shall implement the County Classification and Pay Plan pursuant to Board of Supervisors Resolution 082515-1. 9.That the Board of Supervisors recognizes that the General Assembly has presently approved a 5% increase in pay for each of the Commonwealth's elected constitutional officers. The Board desires to further supplement the pay of the County's presently -elected constitutional officers in recognition of the essential services that they perform. Accordingly, in accordance with Section 15.2-1605.1 of the Code of Virginia, the Board appropriates such a supplement Page 6 of 7 to the County's presently -elected 1) Treasurer, 2) Commissioner of Revenue, 3) Clerk of Circuit Court, and 4) Commonwealth's Attorney, in the amount of 13% above the salary set by the General Assembly and State Compensation Board. If, however, the General Assembly amends its proposed budget for fiscal year 203-2024 to adjust the constitutional officers' salary increase to an amount either below or above the presently -approved 5% increase, the supplement provided by the Board of Supervisors will be adjusted so that the compensation received by the County's presently -elected constitutional officers will be commensurate with the Commonwealth's presently- budgeted 5% increase, plus the above -stated 13% County supplement. Such supplement will be provided to each of the presently -elected constitutional officers in future fiscal years, so long as they remain in office, or until the Board of Supervisors takes additional action to reduce, increase, or eliminate such supplement. 10. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2023. Page 7 of 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023- 2024 CAPITAL BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 25, 2023 and May 9, 2023 concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2023-2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 9, 2023 and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 1 of 3 County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2023-2024 County Capital First Reading May 9, 2023; Second Reading May 23, 2023 Revenues: County Capital: Transfer from General Government Fund County Unrestricted Cash (excl. Transfer from General Govt. Fund) County Restricted Cash Non -County Funding Sources Appropriation Amount $ 7,615,000 6,680,078 325,000 517,550 Total Revenue - County Capital $ 15,137,628 Expenditures: County Capital: FY 2024 Capital Fund supported by General Government Fund excluding General Government Transfers to CIP & Fleet Replacement FY 2024 Capital Year Budget - Assessments and Studies FY 2024 Capital Year Budget - Buildings and Facilities FY 2024 Capital Year Budget - Computer Infrastructure, Software and Hardware FY 2024 Capital Year Budget - Capital Maintenance Programs and Recurring FY 2024 Capital Year Budget - Transportation Subtotal, FY 2022 Capital Year Budget $ 4,015,000 750,000 2,685,000 2,662,628 3,825,000 500,000 10,422,628 FY 2024 Fleet Replacement Budget 700,000 Total Expenditures - County Capital $ 15,137,628 Page 2 of 3 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one project to another so as to provide for the completion of a capital project. 3. That all funded outstanding capital encumbrances at June 30, 2023, are re - appropriated to the 2023-2024 fiscal year to the same account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for capital projects at June 30, 2023, and appropriations in the 2023-2024 fiscal year budget. 5. That the Board of Supervisors anticipates receiving various grants, donations, and other miscellaneous revenues. These anticipated funds are appropriated to the Grants Fund for the various functions and purposes as provided therein, and said appropriation shall be acknowledged and allocated to the appropriate fund upon approval by the Board of Supervisors on the Consent Agenda. 6. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2023. Page 3 of 3 Roanoke County Classification Plan Attachment A — Public Safety Step Structures In order to recruit and retain employees in critical public safety positions for Police, Fire & Rescue, Sheriff and Emergency Communications certain positions have been removed from the Classification Plan format which combined all jobs. Each of these departments will have a step pay structure that identifies the employee pay based on rank and step. The Public Safety pay structures are anchored to the starting rate shown at the lowest level and progress with time in job and promotion in rank. The Public Safety pay structures are being implemented over a period of 3 years. The implementation period began in July 2021 and employees should be in their appropriate step as of July 2023, subject to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors. Attachment B — Classification Plan The Classification Plan provides a summary of all Roanoke County jobs, the pay range, the number of employees assigned to each job and identifies the individual departments. The County has moved to a Decision Band Method (DBM) based classification for non-public safety employees. The grading hierarchy of the Decision Band Method is illustrated by an alpha -numeric nomenclature and is determined by the level of decision making required for the job. The Roanoke County handbook (page 21) chapter 6 section B outlines the grievance procedure and identifies positions including Department Heads that serve at the pleasure of the County Administrator and may not use the grievance procedure. The following positions are considered Department Heads irrespective of title and include: Chief of Fire and Rescue, Chief of Police, Director of Planning, Director of Development Services, Director of Economic Development, Director of Finance and Management Services, Director of General Services, Director of Human Resources, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism, Director of Communications and Information Technology, Director of Library Services, Director of Real Estate Valuation, Director of Social Services, Public Information Officer, Internal Auditor, and any additional departmental units that may be created by organizational changes approved by the County Administrator. The County Administrator and the County Attorney are unclassified positions and the employment arrangement is by contract and approved by the Board of Supervisors. Attachment C — Pay Bands The Pay Bands attachment shows the minimum and maximum pay rates assigned to the pay band. Attachment A Public Safety Step Structures p Structures 4 57,584 54,841 5 $ 74,652 $ 58,879 $ 56,075 6 76,331 7 8 9 10 $ 89,756 $ 91,775 $ 93,840 $ 95,013 $ 78,049 $ 64,636 $ 61,558 $ 79,805 $ 66,091 $ 62,944 $ 81,600 $ 67,578 $ 64,360 $ 82,621 $ 68,422 65,164 11 $ 120,251 $ 96,201 $ 83,653 $ 72,742 $ 69,278 12 $ 121,754 $ 97,403 $ 84,699 $ 73,651 $ 70,144 13 MARKET $ 123,276 $ 98,621 $ 85,758 $ 74,572 $ 71,020 $ 65,979 $ 66,804 $ 67,639 14 $ 124,817 $ 99,854 $ 86,830 $ 75,504 71,908 15 $ 126,377 $ 101,102 $ 87,915 $ 76,447 16 $ 127,957 $ 102,366 $ 89,014 $ 77,403 72,807 $ 73,717 111 181 19 $ 129,557 $ 103,646 $ 90,126 $ 78,371 $ 131,176 $ 104,941 $ 91,253 $ 79,350 74,638 $ 75,571 $ 132,816 $ 106,253 $ 92,394 80,342 20 $ 134,476 $ 107,581 $ 93,549 81,347 21 $ 136,157 $ 108,926 $ 94,718 22 $ 137,859 $ 110,287 $ 95,902 $ 82,363 $ 83,393 23 $ 139,582 $ 111,666 $ 97,101 24 $ 141,327 $ 113,062 $ 98,314 $ 84,436 $ 85,491 25 $ 143,093 $ 114,475 $ 99,543 86,560 4 61,405 58 5 6 7 $ 65,926 $ 67,409 $ 68,926 $ 62,786 $ 59,796 $ 64,199 $ 61,142 $ 65,643 $ 62,517 53,652 $ 54,859 $ 56,093 $ 57,355 8 9 10 $ 75,762 $ 77,467 $ 78,435 $ 70,476 $ 72,062 $ 72,963 $ 67,120 $ 68,630 $ 69,a $ 63,924 $ 65,362 $ 66,180 11 12 $ 91,328 $ 92,469 $ 79,416 $ 73,875 $ 80,408 $ 74,798 13 MARKET $ 117,032 $ 93,625 $ 81,413 $ 75,734 14 $ 118,495 $ 94,795 $ 82,431 $ 76 15 $ 119,976 $ 95 $ 83,462 $ 77,639 16 $ 121,476 $ 97,180 $ 84,505 $ 78,609 17 $ 122,994 $ 98,395 $ 85,561 $ 79,592 18 $ 124,532 $ 99,625 $ 86,631 $ 80,587 19 $ 126 $ 100,870 $ 87,714 $ 81,594 20 $ 127,665 $ 102,131 $ 88,810 $ 82,614 70,357 $ 71,237 $ 72,127 $ 73,028 $ 73,941 $ 74,866 $ 75,802 $ 76,749 $ 77,708 $ 78, 21 $ 129,260 $ 103,408 $ 89,920 $ 83,647 22 $ 130,876 $ 104,700 $ 91,044 $ 84,692 23 $ 132,512 $ 106,009 $ 92,182 $ 85,751 24 $ 134,168 $ 107,334 $ 93,334 $ 86,823 $ 79,664 $ 88659 $ 81,667 $ 82, 25 $ 135,845 $ 108,676 $ 94,501 $ 87,908 $ 83,722 S 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER 100:. 80,711 $ 82,527 $ 84,384 $ 86,282 55,085 52,462 $ 103,158 $ 105,479 $ 107,852 $ 56,325 $ 53,643 $ 68,257 $ 60,472 $ 57,592 $ 54,850 69,793 $ 110,279 $ 88,223 $ 76,716 $ 71,364 $ 66,385 $ 112,760 $ 90,208 $ 78,442 $ 72,969 $ 67,878 $ 114,170 $ 91,336 $ 79,423 $ 73,881 $ 68,727 $ 115,597 $ 92,478 $ 80,415 $ 74,805 $ 69,586 $ 117,042 $ 93,634 $ 81,421 $ 75,740 $ 70,456 $ 118,505 $ 94,804 $ 82,438 $ 76,687 $ 71,336 14 $ 119,986 $ 95,989 $ 83,469 $ 77,645 15 $ 121,486 $ 97,189 $ 84,512 $ 78,616 16 $ 123,005 $ 98,404 $ 85,569 $ 79,599 11 $ 124,542 $ 99,634 $ 86,638 $ 80,594 18 $ 126,099 $ 100 $ 87,721 $ 81,601 19 $ 127,675 $ 102,140 $ 88,818 $ 82,621 20 $ 129,271 $ 103,417 $ 89,928 $ 83,654 21 $ 130,887 $ 104,710 $ 91,052 $ 84,699 22 $ 132,523 $ 106,019 $ 92,190 $ 85,758 23 $ 134,180 $ 107,344 $ 93,343 $ 86,830 24 $ 135,857 $ 108,686 $ 94,509 $ 87,916 25 $ 137,556 $ 110,044 $ 95,691 $ 89,014 $ 72,228 $ 73,131 $ 74,045 $ 74,971 $ 75,908 $ 76,857 $ 77,817 $ 78,790 $ 79,775 $ 80,772 $ 81,782 $ 82 $ 61,832 $ 63,223 $ 64,646 $ 65,454 $ 66,272 $ 67,101 $ 67,940 $ 68,789 $ 69,649 $ 58,::: $ 60,213 $ 61,568 $ 62,337 $ 63,116 $ 63,905 $ 64,704 $ 56,084 $ 57,346 $ 58,636 $ 59,369 $ 60,111 4 66,014 57,907 51,245 5 $ 67,499 $ 59,209 6 $ 86,963 $ 69,018 $ 68542 1 $ 88,919 $ 70,571 $ 61,904 8 $ 90,920 $ 72,159 $ 63,297 9 $ 92,966 $ 73,782 $ 64,721 10 $ 94,128 $ 74,705 $ 65,530 11 $ 95,305 $ 75,638 $ 66,349 12 $ 96,496 $ 76,584 $ 67,178 13 $ 97,702 $ 77,541 $ 68,018 14 $ 98,923 $ 78,510 $ 68,868 15 $ 100,160 $ 79,492 $ 69,729 16 $ 101,412 $ 80,485 $ 70,601 17 $ 102,679 $ 81,491 $ 71,483 18 $ 103,963 $ 82,510 $ 72,377 19 $ 105,263 $ 83,542 $ 73,282 10 $ 106,578 $ 84,586 $ 74,198 21 $ 107,911 $ 85,643 $ 75,125 22 $ 109,259 $ 86,714 $ 76,064 23 $ 110,625 $ 87,798 $ 77,015 24 $ 112,008 $ 88,895 $ 77,978 25 $ 113,408 $ 90,006 $ 78,952 $ 52,398 $ 53,577 $ 54,782 $ 56,015 $ 57,275 $ 57,991 $ 58,716 $ 59,450 $ 60,193 $ 60,945 $ 61,707 $ 62,479 $ 63,260 $ 64,050 $ 64,851 $ 65,662 $ 66,482 $ 67,313 $ 68,155 $ 69,007 $ 69,869 $ 63,214 $ 60,204 $ 57,337 $ 58,627 $ 59,946 $ 61,295 Attachment B Classification Plan Fund Legend: CAO: Information Technology Fund; CMS: Communications Shop Fund; CON: Constitutional Officer; CP: Career Path; ECC: Emergency Communications Center Fund; FEE: PRT Fee ClassFund; FSF: Fleet Service Center Fund; GGF: General Government Fund; GNT: Grant Fund; RCA: RCACP; SCH: PRT School Ground Maintenance Fund; SHA: Shared Servcies; UNC: Unclassified Status Legend: NOEX: Non -Exempt from FLSA EXE/Com: Exempt Compensatory EXE/DISC: Exempt Discretionary ATTACHMENT B: DBM CLASSIFICATION JOB LISTING FY 2023 - 2024 EFFECTIVE 7/1/2023 DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P A13 GGF 1-1756 1787 COURIER NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 30,181 $ A13 GGF J-1731 1758 CUSTODIAN NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 4 $ 30,181 $ A13 GGF J-1746 1776 REFUSE COLLECTOR NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 5 $ 30,181 $ B21 GGF J-1277 1242 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT I NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1203 1153 INCOME TAX COORDINATOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1206 1156 TAX CLERK I *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 5 $ 34,927 $ B21 ECC J-1459 1432 E-911 CALL TAKER NOEX COMMIT 2 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1179 1124 SECRETARY NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 CP J-1661 2388 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 $ 34,927 $ B21 CP J-1664 2392 PERMIT TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF 1-1590 1584 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1732 1759 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 2 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1743 1773 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-2037 2144 LIBRARY ASSISTANT NOEX LIBRARY 13 $ 34,927 $ B21 FEE J-1806 1856 AQUATICS SPECIALIST (FEE) NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 SCH 1-1842 1892 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I (SCHOOL) NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 $ 34,927 $ B21 CP J-1841 1891 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 17 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1845 1899 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1853 1906 PARKS & FACILITY SERVICE TECHNICIAN NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1851 1904 PARKS CLERK NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1870 1936 RECREATION TECHNICIAN NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1535 1537 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX POLICE 2 $ 34,927 $ B21 CP J-1536 1540 RECORDS TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX POLICE 6 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1332 1298 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-2081 2207 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX ELECTIONS 1 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1962 2066 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 6 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF 1-1977 2085 SOCIAL SERVICES AIDE NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 $ 34,927 $ B21 GGF J-1351 1321 TREASURER CLERK I NOEX TREASURER 2 $ 34,927 $ B22 GGF J-1278 1243 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT II NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 3 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1204 1154 REAL ESTATE CLERK II NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1206 1157 TAX CLERK II *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE $ 39,659 $ B22 CMS J-1458 1431 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT INSTALLER NOEX COMMIT 3 $ 39,659 $ B22 CAO J-1476 1457 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX COMMIT 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1178 1123 LEGAL SECRETARY NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 3 $ 39,659 $ B22 GNT J-1181 1126 VICTIM/WITNESS ASSISTANTCOORD(GRANT) NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 CP J-1661 2401 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 39,659 $ B22 CP J-1664 2393 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1379 1354 ACCOUNTS REPRESENTATIVE NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 $ 39,659 $ B22 CP J-1727 1752 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH I *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 7 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1755 1786 CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF 1-1734 1761 EQUIPMENT TECHNICIAN NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 0 $ 39,659 $ B22 FSF 1-1739 1767 FLEET MECHANIC I (FSF) NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 8 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1757 1788 FLEET MECHANIC I *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 2 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1742 1772 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 FSF J-1753 1784 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST (FLEET) NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-2034 2139 DEPARTMENT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX LIBRARY 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-2043 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT NOEX LIBRARY 11 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-2043 2150 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT BENT MOUNTAIN NOEX LIBRARY $ 39,659 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P B22 GGF J-2043 2149 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR NOEX LIBRARY $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-2043 2154 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT MATERIALS MANAGEMENT NOEX LIBRARY $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF 1-2043 2151 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT MT PLEASANT NOEX LIBRARY $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-2043 2152 SENIOR LIBRAYASSISTANT (OTHER) NOEX LIBRARY $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1832 1882 HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 SCH J-1842 1894 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II (SCHOOL) NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 39,659 $ B22 CP J-1841 1893 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1895 1961 RECREATION SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 CP J-1536 1538 RECORDS TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX POLICE $ 39,659 $ B22 RCA J-2150 2233 ANIMAL SUPPORT ATTENDANT NOEX RCACP 11 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1239 1192 ACCREDITATION SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1228 1183 CIVIL PROCESS SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1229 1184 CONTROL ROOM OPERATOR NOEX SHERIFF 2 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1950 2050 ACCOUNTS COORDINATOR NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1955 2056 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 32 $ 39,659 $ B22 GNT J-1984 2092 CSA COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1357 1327 COLLECTIONS SPECIALIST NOEX TREASURER 1 $ 39,659 $ B22 GGF J-1352 1322 TREASURER CLERK II NOEX TREASURER 3 $ 39,659 $ B23 GGF J-1279 1244 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT III NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 6 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1200 1150 BUSINESS ORDINANCE INSPECTOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1206 1158 TAX CLERK III *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1207 1160 TAX COMPLIANCE DEPUTY NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 ECC J-1487 1473 TECHNICAL ANALYST I (ECC) NOEX COMMIT 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1481 1463 TECHNICAL ANALYST I *CP NOEX COMMIT 5 $ 44,391 $ B23 GNT J-1182 1127 VICTIM/WITNESS ASST DIRECTOR (GRANT) NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 CP J-1654 2380 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1661 2389 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 44,391 $ B23 CP J-1664 2394 PERMIT TECHNICIAN III *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 44,391 $ B23 CP J-1674 2405 STORMWATER INSPECTOR I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1391 1367 ACCOUNTS REPRESENTATIVE II NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1396 1372 PURCHASING TECHNICIAN NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1597 1604 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 CP J-1727 1753 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH II*CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 44,391 $ B23 FSF J-1739 1766 FLEET MECHANIC II (FSF) NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1757 1789 FLEET MECHANIC II *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1749 1780 SOLID WASTE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 23 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-2044 2153 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COORDINATOR NOEX LIBRARY 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1820 1871 MARKETING & ELECTRONIC SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1841 1895 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III *CP NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 SCH J-1842 1963 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III (SCHOOL) NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1856 1909 PARKS MAINTENANCE SERVICE SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1866 RECREATION PROGRAMMER NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 6 $ 44,391 $ B23 FEE J-1867 1928 RECREATION PROGRAMMER (FEE) NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1866 1926 RECREATION PROGRAMMER ASK NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1866 1925 RECREATION PROGRAMMER BRAMBLETON NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1866 1927 RECREATION PROGRAMMER CAMP ROANOKE NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1866 1929 RECREATION PROGRAMMER THERAPEUTIC REC NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1691 2325 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX PLANNING 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1525 1525 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX POLICE 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 RCA J-2156 2238 FOSTER COORDINATOR NOEX RCACP 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 RCA J-2161 2241 RESCUE & VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR NOEX RCACP 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-2075 2200 ASST GENERAL REGISTRAR NOEX ELECTIONS 1 $ 44,391 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P B23 GGF J-2085 2210 ABSENTEE VOTING & ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ASSISTANT NOEX ELECTIONS 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 SHA J-1152 1102 MULTIMEDIA PRODUCER I NOEX RVTV 2 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1225 1180 ACCREDITATION SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1951 2051 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1965 2069 FAMILY SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 37 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1974 2082 SELF SUFFICIENCY SERVICE INTAKE SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1987 2097 SELF SUFFICIENCY SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 5 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1979 2087 SENIOR BENEFIT PROGRAMS SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 4 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1970 2078 TECHNICAL ANALYST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 44,391 $ B23 GNT J-1301 1271 YOUTH SURVEILLANCE OFFICER (GRANT) NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 3 $ 44,391 $ B23 GGF J-1353 1323 TREASURER CLERK III NOEX TREASURER 3 $ 44,391 $ B24 GGF J-1205 1155 REAL ESTATE CLERK SUPERVISOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1208 1159 TAX CLERK IV NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 CMS J-1463 1440 COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN NOEX COMMIT 3 $ 50,316 $ B24 ECC J-1487 1474 TECHNICAL ANALYST II (ECC) NOEX COMMIT $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1481 1464 TECHNICAL ANALYST II *CP NOEX COMMIT $ 50,316 $ B24 CP J-1654 2379 COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1658 2385 GIS SPECIALIST NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 CP J-1674 2406 STORMWATER INSPECTOR II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 50,316 $ B24 CP J-1383 1358 BUYER *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 3 $ 50,316 $ 824 GGF J-1393 1369 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 3 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1589 1598 FIRE LOGISTICS TECHNICIAN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 FSF J-1739 1768 FLEET MECHANIC III (FSF) NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1757 1790 FLEET MECHANIC III *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1105 1065 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST NOEX HUMAN RESOURCES 2 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1852 1905 PARKS CREW LEADER NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1127 1092 PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST NOEX PIO 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1696 2331 PLANNER I NOEX PLANNING 3 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1534 1532 INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX POLICE 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF 1-2149 2243 ANIMAL HEALTH ATTENDANT NOEX RCACP 2 $ 50,316 $ B24 RCA J-2153 2235 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR NOEX RCACP 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 RCA J-2160 2232 MAINTENANCE TECH/CUSTODIAN NOEX RCACP 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1333 1299 REAL ESTATE & LAND USE COORDINATOR NOEX REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1968 2076 FRAUD INVESTIGATOR NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1985 2094 JUVENILE INTERVENTION SERVICES SPECIALIST (GRANT) NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1964 2068 SR FAMILY SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 8 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1986 2095 FAMILY ASSESSMENT & PLANNING TEAM (FAPT) FACILITATOR NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1980 2088 SR SELF SUFFICIENCY SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 $ 50,316 $ B24 GGF J-1354 1324 TREASURER CLERK SUPERVISOR NOEX TREASURER 2 $ 50,316 $ B25 GNT J-1055 1027 DEPUTY CLERK TO BOS NOEX BOS 1 $ 57,421 $ B25 ECC J-1487 1475 TECHNICAL ANALYST III (ECC) NOEX COMMIT $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1481 1465 TECHNICAL ANALYST III *CP NOEX COMMIT $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1665 2395 PERMIT TECHNICIAN SUPERVISOR NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B25 CP J-1654 2397 SR COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 57,421 $ B25 CP J-1674 2407 STORMWATER INSPECTOR III *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1668 2402 STORMWATER MAINTENANCE FOREMAN NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 $ 57,421 $ B25 CP J-1383 1376 SENIOR BUYER *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1393 1385 SENIOR PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 57,421 $ B25 FSF J-1739 1769 FLEET MECHANIC IV (FSF) NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1757 1791 FLEET MECHANIC IV *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES $ 57,421 $ B25 GGF J-1957 2061 BENEFIT PROGRAMS TRAINER NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B25 CMS J-1488 1476 COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION FOREMAN NOEX COMMIT 1 $ 57,421 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P B25 GGF J-1976 2084 SERVICES TRAINER NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B31 GGF J-1280 1248 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL CHANCERY EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1280 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT IV EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 4 $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1280 1245 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT IV CIVIL LAW EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1280 1246 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT IV CRIMINAL EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1280 1247 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT IV LAND RECORDS EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1730 1756 GENERAL SERVICES CREW LEADER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 2 $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-1748 1778 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FOREMAN EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 2 $ 50,316 $ B31 GGF J-2039 2146 LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 $ 50,316 $ B31 FEE J-1825 BUSINESS SERVICES SUPERVISOR (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 2 $ 50,316 $ B31 FEE J-1825 1950 BUSINESS SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXPLORE PARK (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 50,316 $ B31 FEE J-1825 1875 BUSINESS SERVICES SUPERVISOR GREEN RIDGE (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 50,316 $ B31 FEE J-1840 1890 MEMBERSHIP SUPERVISOR (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 50,316 $ B31 CP J-1325 1290 APPRAISER I *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION 7 $ 50,316 $ B32 GGF J-1000 1000 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP ADMINISTRATION 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1183 1128 VICTIM WITNESS DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1075 1040 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1652 2376 CHIEF INSPECTOR/FIELD SUPV EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1656 2383 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COORDINATOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 FSF J-1754 1785 FLEET SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1741 1771 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1752 1782 WELDING SHOP SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 0 $ 57,421 $ B32 FEE J-1847 1900 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1854 1907 PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 SCH J-1855 1908 PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR (SCHOOL) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1868 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 5 $ 57,421 $ B32 FEE J-1869 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 3 $ 57,421 $ B32 FEE J-1869 1934 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR AQUATICS (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1868 1931 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR ATHLETICS EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1868 1930 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR BRAMBLETON EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1868 1932 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR CAMP ROANOKE EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 FEE J-1869 1951 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR EXPLORE PARK (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 FEE J-1869 1933 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROGRAMS (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1868 1935 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR WELLNESS EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 57,421 $ B32 GGF J-1537 1539 POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP POLICE 1 $ 57,421 $ B32 RCA J-2158 2240 KENNEL MANAGER EXE/COMP RCACP 1 $ 57,421 $ C41 GGF J-1005 1003 ASSISTANT TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP ADMINISTRATION 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1455 1428 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1454 1425 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 13 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1466 1443 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1480 1462 SYSTEMS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1484 1470 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CAO J-1485 1471 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1675 2409 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1135 2305 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST EXE/COMP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1375 1350 BUDGET ANALYST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GNT J-1404 1382 FINANCIAL ANALYST (GRANT) EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CP J-1387 1362 FINANCIAL ANALYST *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1576 1580 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1591 1585 COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATOR EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1579 1581 DATA ANALYST - F & R EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1729 1755 CAPITAL PROJECTS SPECIALIST EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 58,250 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P C41 GGF J-1737 1764 FACILITIES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1740 1770 HOUSEKEEPING SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2026 2131 ADMINISTRATIVE & MARKETING MANAGER EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2031 2137 BRANCH LBRARIAN VINTON EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2031 BRANCH LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2031 2135 BRANCH LIBRARIAN GLENVAR EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2031 2136 BRANCH LIBRARIAN HOLLINS EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2036 DIVISIONAL LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2036 2142 DIVISIONAL LIBRARIAN ADULT EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2036 2141 DIVISIONAL LIBRARIAN CHILDREN EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2036 2143 DIVISIONAL LIBRARIAN YOUNG ADULT EXE/COMP LIBRARY $ 58,250 $ C41 SHA J-2030 2134 INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEMS/TECHNOLOGY COORDINATOR EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF 1-2041 2147 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1810 1861 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1844 1897 MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1126 1091 PIO MANAGER EXE/COMP PIO 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1528 1528 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP POLICE 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 CP J-1325 1300 APPRAISER II *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-2084 2201 ASST DIRECTOR & ELECTION MANAGER EXE/COMP ELECTIONS 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1226 1181 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SHERIFF 1 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1956 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 4 $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1956 2060 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR ADULT A EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1956 2057 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR ADULT B EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1956 2059 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR FAMILY/CHILDREN A EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1956 2058 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR FAMILY/CHILDREN B EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 58,250 $ C41 GGF J-1973 2081 RESOURCE COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 0 $ 58,250 $ C41 GNT J-1981 2089 UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (GRANT) EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 58,250 $ C42 GGF J-1054 1026 CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK TO BOS EXE/COMP BOS 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1275 1240 CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1201 1151 CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF THE REVENUE EXE/COMP COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1454 1426 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 62,601 $ C42 ECC J-1457 1430 COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 CMS J-1461 1435 COMMUNICATIONS SHOP MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1466 1444 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1471 1449 GIS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1480 1461 SYSTEMS ARCHITECT*CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1484 1469 TELECOMMUNICATIONSARCHITECT*CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 62,601 $ C42 CAO J-1485 1472 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 62,601 $ C42 CP J-1653 2377 CIVIL ENGINEER I *CP EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1667 2398 SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER/CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1670 2403 STORMWATER OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1402 1380 FINANCIAL SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1392 1368 PAYROLL SPECIALIST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GNT J-1404 1383 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I (GRANT) EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 62,601 $ C42 CP 1-1387 1377 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1750 1781 DEPARTMENT SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 FSF J-1738 1765 FLEET/GARAGE MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1747 1777 SOLID WASTE MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1109 1068 HR MANAGER- BENEFITS EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 FEE 1-1813 1864 CENTER MANAGER (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1848 1901 PARKS ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC&TOURISM 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1857 PARKS MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 2 $ 62,601 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P C42 GGF J-1857 1912 PARKS MANAGER GROUNDS EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1857 1913 PARKS MANAGER TURF/PROJECTS EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1880 1946 TOURISM/EVENT COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 0 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1697 2332 PLANNER II EXE/COMP PLANNING 3 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1700 2335 TRANSPORTATION PLANNER EXE/COMP PLANNING 2 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1542 1544 DEPARTMENT SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP POLICE 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 RCA J-2154 2236 DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS EXE/COMP RCACP 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 CP J-1325 1297 SENIOR APPRAISER *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 7 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2073 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR ADOPTIONS EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2074 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR ADULT SERVICES EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2070 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR CPS INVESTIGATIONS EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2072 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR FOSTER CARE EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2096 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR FOSTER CARE B EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2093 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR IN HOME SERVICES EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1966 2071 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR PREVENTION EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1975 2083 SELF SUFFICIENCY SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 62,601 $ C42 GGF J-1350 1320 CHIEF DEPUTY TREASURER EXE/COMP TREASURER 1 $ 62,601 $ C43 CAO J-1454 1427 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 66,952 $ C43 CAO J-1467 1445 DATA SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 CAO J-1471 1450 GIS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 66,952 $ C43 CAO J-1475 1456 NETWORK SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 CAO J-1483 1468 TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 CP J-1653 2378 CIVIL ENGINEER II *CP EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1377 1352 BUDGET MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1389 FINANCE MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1389 1365 FINANCE MANAGER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1389 1364 FINANCE MANAGER PAYROLL/RISK EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 66,952 $ C43 GNT J-1404 1384 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II (GRANT) EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 66,952 $ C43 CP J-1387 1378 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1110 1069 HR MANAGER- ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-2025 2130 ADMINISTRATIVE LIBRARIAN - MATERIAL MANAGEMENT EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-2027 2132 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-2042 2148 SENIOR BRANCH LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1865 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1865 1922 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER ASK EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1865 1921 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER ATHLETICS EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1865 1923 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER BRAMBLETON EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1865 1924 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER CAMP ROANOKE EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 66,952 $ C43 SHA J-1826 1876 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY PROJECT COORDINATOR EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1703 2338 TRANSIT PLANNER EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1699 2334 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1532 1531 CRIME ANALYST EXE/COMP POLICE 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 SHA J-1151 1101 MULTIMEDIA PRODUCER II EXE/COMP RVTV 2 $ 66,952 $ C43 GGF J-1952 2052 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 66,952 $ C43 GNT J-1960 2064 COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE ACT COORDINATOR (GRANT) EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 66,952 $ C44 GGF J-1003 1001 INTERNAL AUDITOR EXE/COMP INTERNAL AUDITOR 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 CAO J-1470 1448 ENTERPRISE SERVICES MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1381 1356 ACCOUNTING MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1376 1351 BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1395 1371 PURCHASING DIVISION DIRECTOR EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1736 1763 FACILITIES MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 72,401 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P C44 GGF J-1104 1064 HR MANAGER -GENERALIST EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1890 1957 CAPITAL PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1858 1914 PARKS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1859 1915 PARKS SUPERINTENDENT EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 FEE J-1886 1954 RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT (FEE) EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1698 2333 PRINCIPAL PLANNER EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 $ 72,401 $ C44 GGF J-1701 2336 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 $ 72,401 $ C45 GGF J-1180 1125 SENIOR ASSISANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 6 $ 78,934 $ C45 GGF J-1669 2399 STORMWATER OPERATIONS MANAGER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 78,934 $ C45 GGF J-1671 2400 STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 78,934 $ C45 GGF J-1657 2384 PROJECT ENGINEER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 $ 78,934 $ C45 GGF J-1390 1366 FINANCE MANAGER - SYSTEMS EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 78,934 $ C45 GGF J-1107 1067 HR MANAGER/SYSTEMS EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 78,934 $ C51 CAO J-1452 1422 APPLICATION SERVICES MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 72,401 $ C51 CAO J-1472 1451 GIS MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 72,401 $ C51 CAO J-1473 1454 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES MGR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 $ 72,401 $ C52 GGF J-1176 1121 CHIEF ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COMMWLTHATTORNEY 1 $ 78,934 $ D61 GGF J-1080 1044 SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COUNTY ATTORNEY 2 $ 84,383 $ D61 GGF J-1080 1044 SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 84,383 $ D61 RCA J-2162 2242 VETERINARIAN EXE/COMP RCACP 1 $ 84,383 $ D61 SHA J-1150 1100 DIRECTOR OF CABLE ACCESS EXE/DISC RVTV 1 $ 84,383 $ D62 ECC J-1486 1423 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR COMMUNICATIONS EXE/DISC COMMIT 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 CAO J-1453 1424 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR INFORMATION TECH EXE/DISC COMMIT 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1651 2375 BUILDING COMMISSIONER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1655 2381 COUNTY ENGINEER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1131 2301 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXE/DISC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1382 1357 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE EXE/DISC FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1726 1751 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES EXE/DISC GENERAL SERVICES 0 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1100 1060 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HR EXE/DISC HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-2028 2133 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES EXE/DISC LIBRARY 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1807 1857 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PARKS EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1807 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 3 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1807 1858 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF RECREATION EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1807 1964 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOURISM EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1125 1090 PIO OFFICER EXE/DISC PIO 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1702 2337 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING EXE/DISC PLANNING 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1326 1291 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION EXE/DISC REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1954 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES 2 $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1954 2054 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES BENEFITS EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES $ 88,734 $ D62 GGF J-1954 2055 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD WELFARE EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES $ 88,734 $ E81 GGF J-2035 2140 DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES EXE/DISC LIBRARY 1 $ 110,516 $ E81 RCA J-2155 2237 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF RCACP EXE/DISC RCACP 1 $ 110,516 $ E81 GGF J-1328 1293 DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION EXE/DISC REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 $ 110,516 $ E82 CAO J-1468 1446 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EXE/DISC COMMIT 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1650 2382 DIRECTOR OF DEV SERV EXE/DISC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1133 2303 DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXE/DISC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1733 1760 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES EXE/DISC GENERAL SERVICES 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1102 1062 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES EXE/DISC HUMAN RESOURCES 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1819 1870 DIRECTOR OF PARKS, REC & TOURISM EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1690 2327 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING EXE/DISC PLANNING 1 $ 114,867 $ E82 GGF J-1963 2067 DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES 1 $ 114,867 $ E83 GGF J-1386 1361 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES EXE/DISC FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 $ 119,218 $ DBM Fund JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM P E83 GGF J-1578 1591 CHIEF OF FIRE AND RESCUE EXE/DISC FIRE & RESCUE 1 $ 119,218 $ E83 GGF J-1529 1529 CHIEF OF POLICE EXE/DISC POLICE 1 $ 119,218 $ F101 GGF J-1001 1004 ASST COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EXE/DISC ADMINISTRATION 1 $ 136,649 $ F103 GGF J-1007 1007 DEPUTYCOUNYADMINISTRATOR EXE/DISC ADMINISTRATION 1 $ 145,351 $ UNC GGF J-1002 1006 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION 1 UNC GGF J-1053 1030 BOARD OF SPVRS VICE CHAIRMAN BOS 1 UNC GGF J-1052 1029 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEMBER BOS 3 UNC GGF J-1051 1028 BOS CHAIRMAN BOS 1 UNC GGF J-1276 1241 CLRK OF CIR CT CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 UNC GGF J-1202 1152 COMMISIONER OF REVENUE COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 UNC GGF J-1177 1122 COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY COMMWLTHATTORNEY 1 UNC GGF J-1077 1041 COUNTY ATTORNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 UNC GNT 1-1403 1381 WORKER'S COMP REHAB WORKER (GRANT) NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 UNC GGF J-2082 2208 DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS & GENERAL REGISTRAR EXE/DISC ELECTIONS 1 UNC GGF J-1244 1196 SHERIFF SHERIFF 1 UNC GGF J-1356 1326 TREASURER TREASURER 1 ECC J-1460 1433 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER I *CP NOEX COMMIT 22 Se( ECC J-1460 1434 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER II *CP NOEX COMMIT Se( ECC J-1462 1436 COMMUNICATIONS TEAM SUPERVISOR NOEX COMMIT 5 Se( ECC J-1465 1442 COMMUNICATIONSTRAININGOFFCR NOEX COMMIT 8 Se( ECC J-1469 1447 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 Se( GGF J-1575 1589 BATTALION CHIEF EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 8 Se( GGF J-1580 1592 DEPUTY CHIEF EXE/DISC FIRE & RESCUE 2 Se( GGF J-1577 1590 FIRE CAPTAIN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 29 Se( GGF J-1586 1596 FIRE INSPECTOR NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 2 Se( GGF J-1598 1607 FIRE INSPECTOR CAPTAIN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 Se( GGF J-1588 1597 FIRE LIEUTENANT NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 26 Se( GNT J-1596 1602 FIREFIGHTER (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 15 Se( GGF J-1585 1595 FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 113 Se( GGF J-1585 1599 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE Se( GNT J-1596 1606 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE Se( GGF J-1585 1600 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE Se( GNT J-1596 1605 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE Se( GGF J-1526 1526 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE EXE/DISC POLICE 2 Se( GGF J-1530 1530 POLICE OFFICER - COMMANDER EXE/COMP POLICE 9 Se( GGF J-1540 1542 POLICE OFFICER - SGT NOEX POLICE 16 Se( GGF J-1531 1533 POLICE OFFICER - UNIFORM DIV *CP NOEX POLICE 114 Se( GGF J-1531 1534 POLICE OFFICER II *CP NOEX POLICE Se( GGF J-1531 1535 POLICE OFFICER III *CP NOEX POLICE Se( GGF J-1531 1536 POLICE OFFICER IV *CP NOEX POLICE Se( GGF J-1237 1190 DEPUTY SHERIFF - LT COLONEL EXE/DISC SHERIFF 2 Se( GGF J-1243 1203 DEPUTY SHERIFF - SERGEANT NOEX SHERIFF 15 Se( GGF J-1227 1182 DEPUTY SHERIFF - CAPTAIN EXE/DISC SHERIFF 3 Se( GGF J-1236 1202 DEPUTY SHERIFF - LIEUTENANT NOEX SHERIFF 7 Se( GGF 1-1230 1198 DEPUTY SHERIFF*CP NOEX SHERIFF 56 Se( GGF J-1230 1199 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II *CP NOEX SHERIFF Se( GGF J-1230 1205 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II* CP MEDICAL NOEX SHERIFF Se( GGF J-1230 1200 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF III *CP NOEX SHERIFF Se( GGF J-1230 1201 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF IV *CP NOEX SHERIFF Se( CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2023-2024 CAREER PATHS BAND DBM JOB# POS# POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP B21 J-1206 1156 TAX CLERK I*CP NOEX COMM OF REV B22 J-1206 1157 TAX CLERK IICP NOEX COMM OF REV B23 J-1206 1158 TAX CLERK III *CP NOEX COMM OF REV MINIMUM (DBM) 34,927 39,659 44,391 B22 1-1460 1433 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER I *CP NOEX COMMIT B23 1-1460 1434 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER II *CP NOEX COMMIT 22 39,659 44,391 B23 J-1481 1463 TECHNICAL ANALYST I*CP NOEX COMMIT B24 J-1481 1464 TECHNICAL ANALYST II*CP NOEX COMMIT B25 1-1481 1465 TECHNICAL ANALYST III *CP NOEX COMMIT 44,391 50,316 57,421 B23 1-1487 1473 TECHNICAL ANALYST I (ECC) NOEX COMMIT B24 1-1487 1474 TECHNICAL ANALYST II (ECC) NOEX COMMIT B25 J-1487 1475 TECHNICAL ANALYST III (ECC) NOEX COMMIT 44,391 50,316 $ 57,421 C42 1-1471 1449 GIS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT C43 1-1471 1450 GIS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 62,601 66,952 C41 1-1484 1470 C42 1-1484 1469 C41 J-1454 1425 C42 J-1454 1426 C43 J-1454 1427 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER *CP TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECT *CP BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT EXE/COMP COMMIT 58,250 62,601 EXE/COMP EXE/COMP EXE/COMP COMMIT COMMIT COMMIT 13 58,250 62,601 66,952 C C41 1-1485 1471 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT C42 J-1485 1472 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 58,250 62,601 C C41 1-1466 1443 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT C42 J-1466 1444 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT $ 58,250 62,601 C41 J-1480 1462 SYSTEMS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT C42 1-1480 1461 SYSTEMS ARCHITECT *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 58,250 62,601 B21 1-1661 2388 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX DEV SERV B22 1-1661 2401 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX DEV SERV B23 1-1661 2389 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III *CP NOEX DEV SERV 34,927 39,659 41,487 B21 1-1664 2392 PERMIT TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX DEV SERV B22 J-1664 2393 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX DEV SERV B23 1-1664 2394 PERMIT TECHNICIAN III *CP NOEX DEV SERV 3 34,927 39,659 44,391 B23 1-1654 2380 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR*CP NOEX DEV SERV B24 1-1654 2379 COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE IN NOEX DEV SERV B25 1-1654 2397 SENIOR COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEV SERV $ 44,391 50,316 57,421 B23 1-1674 2405 STORMWATER INSPECTOR I *CP NOEX DEV SERV B24 J-1674 2406 STORMWATER INSPECTOR II *CP NOEX DEV SERV B25 J-1674 2407 STORMWATER INSPECTOR III *CP NOEX DEV SERV 44,391 50,316 57,421 C42 J-1653 2377 CIVIL ENGINEER I *CP EXE/COMP DEV SERV C43 1-1653 2378 CIVIL ENGINEER II *CP EXE/COMP DEV SERV 2 62,601 66,952 B24 1-1393 1369 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV B25 1-1393 1385 SENIOR PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 3 50,316 57,421 B24 1-1383 1358 BUYER*CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV B25 1-1383 1376 SENIOR BUYER *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 3 50,316 57,421 CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2023-2024 CAREER PATHS BAND DBM JOB # POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP C C41 J-1387 1362 FINANCIAL ANALYST *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV C C42 1-1387 1377 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV C C43 1-1387 1378 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 2 MINIMUM (DBM) 58,250 62,601 $ 66,952 C C41 J-1404 1382 FINANCIAL ANALYST (GRANT) EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV C C42 J-1404 1383 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I (GRANT) EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV C C43 J-1404 1384 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II (GRANT) EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 58,250 62,601 66,952 FR STEP J-1585 1595 FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE FR STEP 1-1585 1600 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE FR STEP J-1585 1599 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 113 FR STEP 1-1596 1602 FIREFIGHTER (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE FR STEP J-1596 1605 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE FR STEP J-1596 1606 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT) NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 15 B22 1-1739 B B23 B24 B25 1-1739 1-1739 1739 1767 1766 1768 1769 FLEET MECHANIC I (FSF) FLEET MECHANIC II (FSF) FLEET MECHANIC III (FSF) FLEET MECHANIC IV (FSF) NOEX PRT/GEN SVC NOEX NOEX NOEX PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC 39,659 44,391 50,316 57,421 B B B B22 B23 B24 J-1757 1-1757 J-1757 1788 1789 1790 B B25 1-1757 FLEET MECHANIC I *CP FLEET MECHANIC II *CP FLEET MECHANIC III *CP 791 FLEET MECHANIC IV *CP NOEX NOEX NOEX GEN SVC GEN SVC GEN SVC NOEX GEN SVC 2 $ 37,064 41,486 47,024 53,664 B B22 J-1727 1752 B 823 1-1727 1753 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH I *CP BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH II *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 7 39,659 44,391 B2 B22 B23 J-184 J-184 J-184 891 89 1895 B B B B21 B22 B23 J-1842 J-1842 J-1842 1892 1894 1963 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III *CP MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I(SCHOOL) MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II (SCHOOL) MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III (SCHOOL) NOEX NOEX NOEX PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC 17 34,927 39,659 44,391 NOEX NOEX NOEX PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC PRT/GEN SVC 4 34,927 39,659 44,391 B B21 J-1536 1540 RECORDS TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX POLICE B B22 J-1536 1538 RECORDS TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX POLICE 6 $ 34,927 39,659 PD 5 PD S PD 5 PD S 1-1531 1-1531 1-1531 1-153 1533 1534 1535 1536 B31 C41 C42 J-1325 J-1325 J-1325 1290 1300 1297 POLICE OFFICER UNIFORM DIV *CP POLICE OFFICER II *CP POLICE OFFICER III *CP POLICE OFFICER IV *CP APPRAISER I*CP APPRAISER II *CP SENIOR APPRAISER *CP NOEX POLICE NOEX NOEX NOEX POLICE POLICE POLICE 114 EXE/COMP EXE/COMP EXE/COMP REAL EST VAL REAL EST VAL REAL EST VAL 50,316 58,250 62,601 SHRF 5 1-1230 1198 DEPUTY SHERIFF *CP NOEX SHERIFF 56 SHRF 5 1-1230 1199 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II *CP NOEX SHERIFF SHRF S 1-1230 1205 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II* CP MEDICAL NOEX SHERIFF SHRF 5 1-1230 1200 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF III *CP NOEX SHERIFF SHRF 5 1-1230 1201 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF IV *CP NOEX SHERIFF Attachment C Pay Bands ATTACHMENT C: DBM PAY BANDS HOURLY ANNUAL DBM Min Midpoint Max Min Midpoint Max A13 $14.5101 $17.6790 $20.8479 $30,181 $36,772 $43,364 B21 $16.7918 $20.4591 $24.1263 $34,927 $42,555 $50,183 B22 $19.0668 $23.2308 $27.3948 $39,659 $48,320 $56,981 B23 $21.3417 $26.0025 $30.6633 $44,391 $54,085 $63,780 B24 $24.1905 $29.4735 $34.7564 $50,316 $61,305 $72,293 B25 $27.6063 $33.6353 $39.6643 $57,421 $69,961 $82,502 B31 $24.1905 $29.4735 $34.7564 $50,316 $61,305 $72,293 B32 $27.6063 $33.6353 $39.6643 $57,421 $69,961 $82,502 C41 $28.0047 $36.7562 $45.5076 $58,250 $76,453 $94,656 C42 $30.0965 $39.5017 $48.9069 $62,601 $82,164 $101,726 C43 $32.1885 $42.2474 $52.3062 $66,952 $87,874 $108,797 C44 $34.8081 $45.6856 $56.5630 $72,401 $95,026 $117,651 C45 $37.9489 $49.8080 $61.6671 $78,934 $103,601 $128,268 C51 $34.8081 $45.6856 $56.5630 $72,401 $95,026 $117,651 C52 $37.9489 $49.8080 $61.6671 $78,934 $103,601 $128,268 D61 $40.5686 $53.2463 $65.9239 $84,383 $110,752 $137,122 D62 $42.6605 $55.9920 $69.3234 $88,734 $116,463 $144,193 D63 $44.7523 $58.7375 $72.7227 $93,085 $122,174 $151,263 E81 $53.1325 $69.7364 $86.3403 $110,516 $145,052 $179,588 E82 $55.2244 $72.4820 $89.7396 $114,867 $150,763 $186,658 E83 $57.3163 $75.2276 $93.1389 $119,218 $156,473 $193,729 F101 $65.6964 $86.2266 $106.7567 $136,649 $179,351 $222,054 F103 $69.8802 $91.7178 $113.5554 $145,351 $190,773 $236,195 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2023 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023- 2024 ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CATEGORIES WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 25, 2023 and May 9, 2023 concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2023-2024; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 9, 2023, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 2023, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 1 of 3 County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Roanoke County Public Schools Categories First Reading May9, 2023; Second Reading May23, 2023 Appropriation Amount School Categories Schools Instruction $ 141,100,293 Schools Administration, Attendance, and Health 8,937,355 Schools Pupil Transportation 10,790,025 Schools Operation and Maintenance 19,795,233 Schools Food Service and Other Noninstructional Operations 8,534,234 Schools Facilities 28,299,221 Schools Debt and Fund Transfers 22,605,537 Schools Technology 14,015,177 Schools Non -Categorical Spending: Schools Health Insurance Fund $ 20,722,738 Schools Dental Insurance Fund 1,682,564 Schools Risk Management Fund 383,500 Schools Other Post -Employment Benefits Trust Fund 142,790 Schools Activity Funds 3,931,065 $ 26,862,657 Total - Schools Categories $ 280,939,732 2. That the Non -Categorical Spending represents $20,722,738 for the Schools Health Insurance Fund, $1,682,564 for the Schools Dental Insurance Fund, $383,500 for the Schools Risk Management Fund, $142,790 for the Schools Other Post -Employment Benefits Trust Fund, and $3,931,065 in School Activity Funds. 3. That all funded outstanding categorical encumbrances at June 30, 2023, are re -appropriated to the 2023-2024 fiscal year to the same category for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That all appropriations unexpended and remaining at the end of this fiscal year shall, pursuant to Section 22.1-100 of the Code of Virginia, revert to the fund of the Board of Supervisors from which derived, with the expectation that such Page 2 of 3 funds will be re -appropriated back to Roanoke County Public Schools for use the next year, in accordance with Section 10-6 of the County's Comprehensive Financial Policy. 5. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2023. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing for citizen comments and second reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 10-3 (Levying of License Fees and Taxes) of the Roanoke County Code, raising the threshold of annual gross receipts for those entities required to pay the County Business License Tax (from $135,000 or more to $150,000 or more); and requiring entities that are below that threshold to pay only an annual $50 license fee SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Conduct a public hearing for citizen comment and second reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 10-3 (Levying of License Fees and Taxes) of the Roanoke County Code, raising the threshold of annual gross receipts for those entities required to pay the County Business License Tax (from $135,000 or more to $150,000 or more); and requiring entities that are below that threshold to pay only an annual $50 license fee. BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke currently levies a $50 annual business license fee for entities operating in the County with gross receipts under $135,000. Entities with gross receipts over $135,000 pay an annual business license tax, with rates based on the category of business. During the fiscal year 2023-2024 budget development process, information on the Business, Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax was requested by the Board of Supervisors at a work session held on February 14, 2023 as part of citizen tax relief options. Page 1 of 2 State Code requires a public hearing to receive written and oral comments on changes to County Code. This hearing satisfies that requirement DISCUSSION: The County Administrator's Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Operating Budget included a provision to increase the gross receipts threshold from $135,000 to $150,000 for which only a $50 fee is levied. To make this change, County Code will be required to be amended. The public hearing was advertised on May 9, 2023 and May 16, 2023 as required by State Code. There have been no changes since the first reading of the ordinance on May 9, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Increasing the gross receipts threshold from $135,000 to $150,000 for which only a $50 fee is levied is estimated to reduce BPOL revenue by approximately $50,000. County staff has accounted for that revenue reduction in the proposed fiscal year 2023-2024 County operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conducting the public hearing to satisfy State code requirements and receive citizen comments on the Ordinance Amending Section 10-3 (Levying of License Fees and Taxes), raising the threshold of annual gross receipts and approving the attached ordinance. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10-3 (LEVYING OF LICENSE FEES AND TAXES) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, RAISING THE THRESHOLD OF ANNUAL GROSS RECEIPTS FOR THOSE ENTITIES REQUIRED TO PAY THE COUNTY BUSINESS LICENSE TAX (FROM $135,000 OR MORE TO $150,000 OR MORE); AND REQUIRING ENTITIES THAT ARE BELOW THE THRESHOLD TO PAY ONLY AN ANNUAL $50 LICENSE FEE WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3703 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, authorizes localities to enact an ordinance levying a local license tax and/or fee for issuing a business license; and WHEREAS, Section 10-3(1) of the County Code presently imposes a fifty dollar ($50) annual license fee upon those entities whose annual gross receipts (during the prior year) are less than one hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000); and WHEREAS, Section 10-3(2) of the County Code presently imposes an annual license tax upon those entities whose annual gross receipts (during the prior year) from a business, trade, profession, occupation or calling are one hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000) or greater; and WHEREAS, in order to encourage and benefit small businesses in Roanoke County, it is proposed that the above County Code provisions be amended to 1) raise the threshold of annual gross receipts for those entities required to pay the County business license tax from one hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000) or more to one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) or more, and 2) require that entities below the threshold to pay only the annual fifty dollar ($50) license fee; and Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 2023, and the second reading and public hearing was held on May 23, 2023. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. That Sections 10-3(a)(1) and (2) of the Roanoke County Code are hereby amended as follows: Sec. 10-3. - Levying of license fees and taxes. (a) Subject to the limitations provided in § 58.1-3703.C. of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and except as otherwise specifically provided for in this chapter of the Roanoke County Code, there are hereby imposed and levied for each and every year, beginning with January 1 of each year and ending December 31 following, and there shall be collected the following license fees and taxes upon the privilege of doing business or exercising a profession, trade, occupation or calling, including all phases thereof, in the county, which license fees and taxes shall be for the support of the county government, payment of the county debt, and for other county and public purposes: (1) There is hereby imposed and there shall be collected an annual license fee in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) for issuance of a license on businesses, trades, professions, occupations and callings and upon the persons, firms and corporations engaged therein within the county; provided, however, that this license fee shall not be charged to any person whose gross receipts from a business, trade, profession, occupation or calling are one hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000.00) one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) or greater during the preceding calendar year and who is subject to levy and payment of the annual license taxes as provided in subsection (a)(2) hereof; and (2) There is hereby levied and there shall be collected the annual license taxes at the rates and in the amounts hereinafter set forth in this chapter upon any person, firm, or corporation engaged in a business, trade, profession, occupation or calling subject to licensure in the county. Except as may be otherwise authorized by specific or special provisions of chapter 37 (§ 58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and this chapter of the Roanoke County Code, the annual license taxes shall not be imposed upon any person whose gross receipts from a business, profession, trade, occupation or calling are less than one hundred thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000.00) one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) during the preceding calendar year. Page 2 of 3 2. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2023. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Boing US Holdco, Inc. to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and CVOD, Clearbrook Village Overlay District, located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road and 5147 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance for a special use permit for a car wash in a commercial district. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a car wash as "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self- service car washes." A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2 zoning district. The property is also located in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (CVOD). Development in the CVOD is subject to additional building height limits, lot coverage limits, landscaping requirements, signage regulations, and lighting regulations. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this special use permit application Page 1 of 2 on May 2, 2023. One (1) citizen spoke on this application during the public hearing. Her concerns included: losing a retail store that houses many local vendors, location of car wash could be located on other parcels in the area, and that the car wash would not be visually appealing at this location. The Planning Commission reviewed VDOT's comments on the project. The Planning Commission discussed the project, the surrounding zoning, future land use, and the Clearbrook Village Overlay District regulations. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit to operate a car wash with two (2) conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept site plan and conceptual landscaping plan for Take 5 Car Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. dated March 3, 2023, subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke VA prepared by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance granting a special use permit to operate a car wash in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and CVOD, Clearbrook Village Overlay District, with two (2) conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept site plan and conceptual landscaping plan for Take 5 Car Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. dated March 3, 2023, subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke VA prepared by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Request: Location: Tax Parcel: Magisterial District: Suggested SUP Conditions: Boing US Holdco, Inc. To obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and CVOD, Clearbrook Village Overlay District 3434 Buck Mountain Road & 5147 Franklin Road #088.03-02-01.00-0000 Cave Spring 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept site plan and conceptual landscaping plan for Take 5 Car Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. dated March 3, 2023, subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke VA prepared by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Boing US Holdco, Inc is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and Clearbrook Village Overlay District (CVOD), located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road and 5147 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core. Core is a Future Land Use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a car wash as "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self-service car washes." A car wash is only permitted in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, with an approved special use permit. The use is also subject to use and design standards listed in Sec. 30-85-10 of Roanoke County Code as follows: (A) General standards: 1. All new car wash facilities, whether conveyor operated or self service, shall be equipped with a water recycling system for eighty-five (85) percent of the water used. 1 The subject parcel is also located in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (CVOD). The CVOD was enacted by the Board of Supervisors in 2000 for the purpose of "[promoting] future development that is consistent with the current character of Clearbrook, and with the comprehensive plan future land use map and policies for this area." Development in the CVOD is subject to additional building height limits, lot coverage limits, landscaping requirements, signage regulations, and lighting regulations that are spelled out in Section 30-58 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Development in the CVOD is also encouraged, but not required, to meet the "Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Overlay District," which relate to existing conditions, site layout, parking, site access, architectural treatment, landscaping, parking areas, building plantings, stormwater management, lighting, signage, and utilities. The Design Guidelines are intended to be used by property owners in the development and/or redevelopment of their properties within the Clearbrook Village Area. In addition, the Design Guidelines shall be used by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors during the review of rezonings or special use requests that lie within the Primary or Secondary Areas of the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. If the special use permit is approved, construction of the car wash would require comprehensive building and site plan reviews. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — The site is currently home to two structures which have separate address points. The structure at 3434 Buck Mountain Road is two stories, 20,908 square feet, and was constructed in 1978. This structure is currently home to Willow Tree Antiques & Primitives. The structure at 5147 Franklin Road is one story, 1,288 square feet, and was constructed in 1960. This structure is currently home to Psychic Readings by Mrs. Gordon. Approximately 37,000 square feet of the parcel are paved (43% of the parcel's land area), and the site has one access point off of Buck Mountain Road. Topography/Vegetation — This parcel features multiple steep slopes. A steep slope separates the parking lot used by both existing businesses from Willow Tree's receiving bay. Though they are located only 25 feet apart, the elevation of the receiving bay is 10 feet higher than that of the parking lot. The vegetation on this slope is grass. Another steep slope is located along the southwestern boundary of the parcel. This slope is undeveloped and contains dense vegetation consisting mostly of deciduous trees. Strips of grass separate the developed portions of the parcel from the adjacent roads and parcels to the northwest, north, and northeast, and southeast. Elevations on the parcel range from 1,152 feet in the eastern corner of the parcel to 1,192 feet in the center of the parcel's southwestern boundary. Surrounding Neighborhood — The subject site is located at the intersection of Franklin Road and Buck Mountain Road. Walmart is located directly across Franklin Road from the subject site. The Walmart parcel is zoned C-2S, High Intensity Commercial District with a Special Use Permit. All other adjacent parcels are zoned C-2, High intensity Commercial District. Clearbrook Elementary School is adjacent to subject parcel to the southeast, Clearbrook Park is adjacent to the southwest, and ValleyStar Credit Union is adjacent to the northwest. A densely wooded parcel with two vacant structures is located directly across Buck Mountain Road from the subject parcel. Community Outreach — Approximately 59 letters went out to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, the proposed concept plan, concept information for staff, and instructions for how to submit comments. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The concept plan shows an automated tunnel car wash with four parking spaces 2 and twenty-three vacuum bays. Both the car wash and vacuum bays are located in the east -central portion of the parcel, with the vacuum bays located immediately southwest of the car wash. The applicant is proposing to demolish the two existing structures and existing paved area. Access/Traffic Circulation — The subject parcel has only one vehicular access point, which connects to eastbound Buck Mountain Road. This driveway is located only 30 feet west of the Franklin Road/Buck Mountain Road intersection. Vehicles cannot currently access the subject parcel from Franklin Road or westbound Buck Mountain Road, and the applicant is not proposing to construct any new vehicular access points. Under the applicant's proposal, vehicles that access the site would drive south and will either make a slight left to enter the vacuum area, or continue straight towards the car wash. Vehicles that continue straight to the car wash would be separated into two lanes until they reach the pay stalls, which are proposed to be located approximately 45 feet from the parcel's southeastern boundary. After the pay stalls, the driveway to the car wash would consolidate to one lane and run northeast along the southeastern boundary of the parcel (this section is proposed to have an emergency connection to the vacuum area), before turning 90 degrees to the left (northwest) to the car wash entrance. After exiting the car wash, vehicles would continue straight (northwest) then turn 45 degrees to the left (west) and 90 degrees to the right (north) before exiting onto Buck Mountain Road eastbound. Vehicles that enter the vacuum area would retrace their steps to exit. A sidewalk, with two staircases, runs between Psychic Readings by Mrs. Gordon and Franklin Road, but this sidewalk ends at Franklin Road as no sidewalk currently runs along Franklin Road. The applicant is proposing to construct a sidewalk along the property's frontage with Franklin Road which would connect to the crosswalks which are funded for the Franklin Road/Buck Mountain Road/Stable Road intersection. A sidewalk is also proposed to run along the northeastern side of the vacuum area, and would connect the vacuum area to the car wash. Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety — All demolition and construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Roanoke County Transportation - The subject property is included in the Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan. The Plan indicates that the property is located within the Clearbrook Multimodal District and both Buck Mountain Road and Route 220 are identified as Multimodal Through Corridors with sidewalk indicated along Route 220. Please see the excerpt attached for more info. The Clearbrook Village Design Guidelines also indicate that "Pedestrian circulation shall be provided for and coordinated with that generated from adjacent properties." (Page 10, II.D.) VDOT will be constructing pedestrian signals and crosswalks in 2024 as part of intersection improvements at Buck Mountain Road and Route 220. Please include sidewalk along the Buck Mountain Road and Route 220 frontage of this property and connect the sidewalk to VDOT's pedestrian crosswalk ramp. Stormwater Operations - Please be advised that the FEMA Effective Map Date for this site is March 13, 2014 (LETTER OF MAP REVISION ISSUE DATE October 30, 2013). The proposed finish floor elevation will need to be one foot above Base Flood Elevation or higher. Fire and Rescue — Fire and Rescue does not object to this project and it has the potential to increase call volume minimally for potential vehicle accidents. Fire flow and access requirements will be addressed during the site plan review process. 3 General Services — General Services does not see any issues and has no comments. VDOT —1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of- way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. If any future modifications to existing entrances or installations of new entrances are planned, the VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes, but is not limited to, entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3. A traffic impact analysis will be required to determine traffic impacts to Buck Mountain Road and Franklin Road, SW associated with this development. Previously submitted trip generation calculations for this development have been reviewed by VDOT's Traffic Section and found to be adequate for use in the TIA. 4. The engineer and property owner for this development have been made aware of the Smartscale project that will alter the traffic flow at the intersection of Buck Mountain Road and Franklin Road, SW. 5. The Access Management Exception (AM-E) for this development received VDOT approval on March 27, 2023. Any changes to the concept plan may require the Access Management Exception to be revised or an addendum submitted for review and approval. 6. VDOT will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core. Core is a Future Land Use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Boing US Holdco, Inc. is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The subject parcel is also located in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (CVOD). The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core. The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. Staff suggests two conditions for the special use permit which addresses conformance with the submitted site plan and architectural renderings. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: #6-512023 Isaac Henry PC: May 2, 2023 Application Materials BOS: May 23, 2023 4 Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs C-2 District Regulations CVOD Regulations CVOD Landscaping Provisions CVOD Signage Regulations CVOD Lighting Regulation Clearbrook Village Design Guidelines Core Future Land Use Designation Transportation Comments 5 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive POBox29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only, Date receiadi I‚Ia3 Receiver / Applica a PC Placards issued: BO tticA4 l f ,� Case Number — 5 1 Z07_ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning X Special Use o Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Boing US Holdco, Inc., Attn: Rebecca McAllister 400 S. Church St., Suite 700 Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone: (281) 660-9583 Cell #: Email: Rebecca. McAl lister@ Driven Brands.com Contact for Legal Ads Owner's name/address w/zip Springwood Properties, LLC 2917 Trebark Road Buchanan, Virginia 24066 Phone #: Cell #: Email: Property Location 3434 Buck Mountain Road Roanoke, Virginia Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning area: Clearbrook Tax Map No.: 088.03-02-01.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C-2 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1.97 Existing Land Use: Commercial REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2 2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RIS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C-2 High intensity Commercial with Special Use Proposed Land Use: Commercial - Car Wash Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage Yes IK No C IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this requirements of the requested district? FIRST (Rezoning). Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes ( No L Yes 0 No ❑ request? A� 14 r VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) N. N. Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning ' ance in order to: 0) Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to co Mr1 1 0 2023 c Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordina . Gumll' aiti Developmento Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Sl Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACC ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP VIAA Consultation Application Justification R/SIW/CP V/AA T t IF ANY OF R/S/W/CP V/AA 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. iPe6eccm 711,G411ta.2. Owner's Signature a-3 ca3 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Take 5 Car Wash - Boing US Holdco, Inc. The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The request furthers the purpose of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance by redeveloping an existing commercial site along a major commercial corridor. The proposed car wash can serve a large population along that corridor. The proposed car wash conforms with buildings setbacks, lot and building coverage, frontage, and other requirements . specified in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and it is a use allowed by Special Use Permit in the C-2 High Intensity Commercial District. Furthermore, the car wash will be equipped with a water recycling system that will recycle 85% of the water used, as required by Section 30-85-10 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The future land use designation of the site is "Core". The proposed car wash fits into that designation in that it is a personal -service highway-orlented use that serves the region. Because of the high amount of water recycling for the facility, the car wash has a lower environmental impact than more conventional ways of washing cars, and will thus have a lower impact on the existing public water and sewer system in the area. The building design will offer a modern, clean looking look along the commercial corridor, and will complement the mix of commercial uses in that area. And car washes primarily attract visitors that are already using the road, and therefore do not generally introduce new traffic into an area. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. As mentioned above, the proposed modern car wash replace the older existing commercial building on the site. The car wash can accommodate a high volume of cars, has ample stacking, and contains adequate vacuum stations. These factors result in a positive impact to the many members of the public that will use the facility. Because of the high amount of water recycling for the facility, the car wash will have a low impact on the existing public water and sewer system. And because car washes primarily attract visitors that are already using the road, they do not generally introduce new traffic into an area. This car wash will use an existing entrance on Buck Mountain Road and will not introduce a new entrance onto Franklin Road. No detrimental impact on neighboring businesses/residents are anticipated because of this proposed use. 3 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X g. All property lines and easements X h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development X j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS X k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers X m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants X p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed X q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ecca- 2/27/2023 Signature of applicant Date Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list Is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Depai tuient of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided cis part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Rebecca McAllister Name of Petition .Pe6ecc � 712r�Ae�iatan. Petitioner's Signature 2/27/2023 Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 \ of of SDMH R/M=1162.26 6 + 1166.0 SSWR \ \ \ R/M=1162.49 /NV(NORTH)=1154.66 + 1 Z /NV(SOUTH)=1154.73 /NV(WEST)=1154.74 7 iUCK M �� UNTAIN (S 67• VARIA: •THRAW SDMH o PER INSTR: 200911247 R/M=1161.37 POSTED SPEED = 40 MPH TO OPEN of /NV-1164.58 \ RIP,RAP FLOOE(ZONE\A " FOOD.ONE\X`� + 1166.8\ \ \ \ \ \ ,..14rO TAX PARCEL ID: 088.03-02-02.0d )&11671\ MARTINSVILLE DUPONT \ \ \NI EMPLOYEES CREDIT UN/ON INC. \ c)v, /NSTR: 201611971 \ ®� 3452 BUCK MOUNTAIN RD \. ROANOKE VA 7- /RF IN CONC + 1176.7 7 1.3 SDMH R/M=1160.99 /NV(S E.)=1157.83 /NV(iW)=1158.05 15" RCP- / /NV=115 5.. -1359�� 4-158- OF PAVEMENT of +116264 + 1165 1166- 11G7 --1-168- - + 1166.52 -1469 - - -4174- +-11i7.04 - PAVEMENT _ 1 - + 1172.27 + 1172 36 DECK + 117270FF=7177. f17 + 117 88 +117297 1179.0�� -1179 � � \\ \ r\\ \\ 11843T- TAX PARCEL /D: 098.01-01-77.00 ROANOKE CO BOARD OF SL/PERVISERS 1182.9 \ \ \\ // /// LQQ OF ro + 1173.16 \ \\\\ - -;;,)7// / 1.5+ / 6///l/ 118 (/ / �(, �j/ 6 9 10 1E1 12 13 14 16 17 18 �No-x;b44 3 [ELEVATION O ELEVATION KEYNOTES Q RELEASECCNC WAIETARLE Q SUOOIH FACECMU 0 NTT FACE [MU VENEER O STEEL -FM FRAME AT OWEALTAn 00014, PNNTT0 MATCH SW 1. RACK EGO Q EEO UEMNULRE EOOR sVSTEM. REFER TO ROOT PLAN AX11 G 01W4AGT1ARCRPPOANWOW0 110-r15NS0ALOA U*LCOLLAR. G LOIMGCOMFEff W/0IG FlASHING AN C110511RFSCOrvCEALE0µ51ENEP UEP FlE-NU150Eo AENA, col1NO WITH CONT.Np000WNCLPE ON Q RONi PO 110001E PARAPAATION OAPR EESIEG REFE5105PECIHunONs Or Ea10 01 MORE INF000411N Q 000Nr�. H0L0X,WNC PSOr. GEAUZBATNEI,SABEG ENAMEL ELNGN MID Emirs. slonNALL AT Town To maw LxNwARFIBER GENEErr ® PIRAANTgl:u°, NwB3b« 2.P.'"0MA1[OHyX 4 t 5 SEALANT BEMTFN Gm a1.v 4mrvG G NNES on mum C0NCw4TERrARLE NBrrt SLOPE QR LOEwALL GIWNICSAE F19WISR@09A ownk01NSruLE2 Fuson. G EIFS E+NGINREFER TO SHEET Mooroe000,1I011AL 0ETAA.S. p CANOPY1Vs1.. % 6ENoo* O 5' OAEVC DDWNSPWT, RELEASE NIN 5' ARCA GtaDE NEW, WITH CIN61 O. 10REN9EY050 0 WALL SCONCE, REF. NPNRE SONQULE GENERAL NOTES A. CONTRACTOR 10 C0ORWNAIL WITH ENE UARSNOLI RAE REouIOEMENrs 4. RUILDE. SI6NAGE AMR SEPARATE PERMI, CONTRACTOR T001TNN ANAL STAGE 0RAt YS FOR EUILMNG NONAGE UNOFR SEPARATE PERMIT. CONNNCIOR TO TRW ANAL VGNAGE DRAW1v05 FOR .ONrmiMA1ON OF ELEC LAICAL ROLLO .IH PRIOR TO NU COMMENC£MEN0 OF WORK. FEES ELECTRICAL r RE. TO IOW vOTAGf KAN 1OP IFCUPII0 PLAN.CD0ROEIATE NNA LOCATIONS OPCAMERAS WYIH THE OWNER POOR TO THE CDMMFNCINFNI OFWCRA G UFAF54 NOTED OTHEPWASE, MASONRY CONTROL FONTS SHASEBE LOCATED SUCH r1A1 NO S1RAWM RUN OF MAST. EACEEDS B4'L1 REFEE TO COZEN STRUCTURAL NOTES ON 5011 R Row -roman AND NmencEN vNEcutt TIN Aso, LosnomNC rPAUE E AND FRAME ENSRIES. ND FINISHES AND GLASS EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE N0. AREA COLOR 0 TOWER BY MANUF. MATCH SW B19.15EOA1E GIRT /� lJ METAL PANELS SY MENLOIBLEILIMESTONE 0 ACCENT SW MAICNSW COLOR EMS, GRA5 DARECMU MATCH SW COLOR• BINC, BLAUFOA 1 ARCHITECT OF RECORD' RALPH M. COLEMAN VIRGINIA REGISTERED ARCHITECT v "A OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE COR3 DESIGN. LLC ARCHITECTURE "C COR3 Design, LLC i 125 Rhe4t And L Suite 101 Greenville, SC 29601 14 Phoney 861451.5285 -D : Far:. 8E4 990.3085 8 oma*lcor3design.cnm qW5 SFROCTLIPAL E c PLUMBING� MECHANICAL r.MMyy a I ELE1UTRIYAL 0 6 TAKE 5 CAR WASH G= ROA BUCK MOUNTAINANOKEVRD, ROANOKE, VA S - W H -M 10 12 13 17 8 N A4.00 Itnittla EXTERIOR ELEkW-IONS SW 6252 Ice Cube Locator Number: 257-C3 SW 7020 Black Fax Locator Number: 244-C7 FRONT ELEVATION TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: 4/24/23 I I III IV V Color Key: ❑ PMS2191C PMS 7691 C PMS 107 C 1 PMS 7625 C 1. Black White U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc.• UL File #E225670 Copyright Notice T. drawing and an of Signs Unlimited, inn Inc.nd may of Signs Unlimited, n changed or used inanyway without Sq. Ft. Signage: 39.88 Signage Allowance: Roanoke County Clearbrook Overlay District 1 Sq. Ft. per Linear Ft. Building Frontage, up to 5% Facade Area, 3 Signs Maximum Maximum Sq. Ft.: 45 Sq. Ft. • GENERAL LOCATION OF J-BOXES (BY ELECTRICIAN) • TO BE LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING & ACCESSIBLE FOR HOOKUP TO POWER SUPPLIES. NOTE: IF THE PERMANENT POWER IS NOT RUN BEFORE THE SIGNS ARE INSTALLED, IT IS THE ELECTRICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTIONS WHEN THEY RUN THE LINES DETAIL TRANSFORMER LOW VOLTAGE WIRE MECHANICAL FASTENER 1/4" x 6" MIN MUM OF 3 PER LETTER NORMAL 4 PER LETTER CONDUIT LED LIGHTING .080" ALUMINUM BACI( TRIM ACRYLIC FACE MOUNTING SURFACE Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-8689 UO U 0 0 ALUMINUM CAN T/ BRANDING TOWER_ _ RLEV 6/ CMU OVERHANG ELEV t6'-8" $ T/ELEV 0'-0' FINISHEDFLOOR 0 IMPOSED IMAGERY NOTES: •IF ELECTRICIAL LINE/J-BOX IS WITHIN 6' OF ELECTRICAL, CONNECTION TO BE HANDLED B IF NOT ELECTRICAL HANDLED BY OWNER/GC •IF ROOF PENETRATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THEY ARE TO BE SEALED BY A ROOFER. THIS IS HA • REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING WALL SIGNS HANDLED BY GC/OWNER REAR ELEVATION TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: 4/24/23 II III IV - V U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc.• UL File #E225670 Copyright Notice his drawmy and an eof Signs s Unlimited Inc. and a Sogne t be reproduced, Ia changed or used inanyway ehout PAINT SCHEME SIMILAR PAINT A TVP 17 A 4 2 r",:>1 ,01 Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-8689 SIDE A ELEVATION TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: 4/24/23 I I III IV V Color Key: PMS 2191 C PMS 7691 C PMS 107 C PMS 7625 C • Black White • GENERAL LOCATION OF J-BOXES (BY ELECTRICIAN) • TO BE LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING & ACCESSIBLE FOR HOOKUP TO POWER SUPPLIES. NOTE: IF THE PERMANENT POWER IS NOT RUN BEFORE THE SIGNS ARE INSTALLED, IT IS THE ELECTRICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTIONS WHEN THEY RUN THE LINES DETAIL TRANSFORMER LOW VOLTAGE WIRE MECHANICAL FASTENER 1/4" x 6" MIN MUM OF 3 PER LETTER NORMAL 4 PER LETTER CONDUIT LED LIGHTING .080" ALUMINUM BACI( TRIM ACRYLIC FACE MOUNTING SURFACE Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-8689 UO U 0 0 U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc.• UL File #E225670 Copyright Notice nis d,awmy and an aof Signs Unlimited, Inc. a Signs Unlimited, Inc an changed or used int be anyway ehout nttaneo ent. Sq. Ft. Signage: 70.15 Signage Allowance: Roanoke County Clearbrook Overlay District 1 Sq. Ft. per Linear Ft. Building Frontage, up to 5% Facade Area, 3 Signs Maximum Maximum Sq. Ft.: 110 Sq. Ft. SIGNAGE NEAREST PRIMARY ROADWAY ALUMINUM CAN 1 Lri IMPOSED IMAGERY NOTES: •IF ELECTRICIAL LINE/J-BOX IS WITHIN 6' OF ELECTRICAL, CONNECTION TO BE HANDLED B IF NOT ELECTRICAL HANDLED BY OWNER/GC •IF ROOF PENETRATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THEY ARE TO BE SEALED BY A ROOFER. THIS IS HA • REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING WALL SIGNS HANDLED BY GC/OWNER SIDE B ELEVATION TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: 4/24/23 II III IV - V U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc.• UL File #E225670 Copyright Notice his drawmy and an eof Signs s Unlimited Inc. and a Sogne t be reproduced, Ia changed or used inanyway ehout PAINT SCHEME SIMILAR PAINT A Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-8689 GROUND SIGN (MONUMENT) TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: II III IV V U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc.. UL File #E225670 Copyright Notice O ins and all proSi,.s mlimited ma Inc... Signs Unlimited, . and y not be reproduced, publ.bed, CALCULATION DETAIL 38.38 Sq. Ft. 1/2F & 2" ALUMINUM RETAINER ACRYLIC FACE 1 25 THICK ALUMINUM CABINET POLYCARBONATE FA W/ GRAPHIC PRINT 1/2" THICK, 8" TALL ADDRESS (QTY: 2) MOUNTING POLE INSTALLATION TRACK LED STRIP ALUMINUM BACK Reverse Elevation 79, 50" 42,00" NOTE: • INSTALLER TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTION IF POWER IS RUN TIME OF INSTALLATION, • IF THE PERMANENT POWER IS NOT BEFORE THE SIGNS ARE IT IS THE ELECTRICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THE FINA CONNECTIONS WHEN THEY RUN THE LINE(S) • INSTALLER TO DROP ELECTRICAL LINE TO THE BASE OF THE DRILL HOLE AND LEAVE ACCESS TO THE LINE(S) +/- 20 Degree Angle on Can Side 22,13" 12,00" CABINS SKIRT P, NOTE: HOLE AND FOc TO BE DETERMINED Bi Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-868S DIRECTIONAL/WAYFINDING SIGN TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: REVISIONS: I I III IV V DETAIL April 13, 2023 TRIM ACRYLIC FACE POLE Owner/Landlord Approval U) Underwriters Laboratories Inc. - LPL File #E225670 Copyright Notice T. draw., and all or Signs Unlimited, Inc. and may nor be. reproduced, published, :hanged or used In any way roadoN ALUMINUM CAN r217.00i .00" 3.00" 2.00" Q1Y: 1 2" TUBE W/ HOLLOW CHANNEL (TYP.) 2.00 Sq. Ft. QTY: 1 1700" 2.00" 3i00" 2" TUBE W/ HOLLOW 2.00 Sq. QTY: 1 NOTES: • HOLES TO BE DUG BY HAND TO AVOID DAMAGING UNMARKED UNDERGROUND LINES • ALL WAYFINDING SIGNS MUST BE REINFORCED WITH CONCRETE 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-868c SITE PLAN TAKE 5 CAR WASH 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 INITIAL LAYOUT: April 13, 2023 REVISIONS: 4/24/23 II - U` Underwriters Laboratories Inc.• UL File #E225570 Copyright Notice O This drawing and all praduellane manor are the property of Signs Unlimited, Inc. and may nut bu reprnducod, publish., changed or used In any way without Ex BARBARA 000zoNE +' \ VA TEASVIIL LE DUPONT EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION WC 20611911 3450 BUCK MOUNTAIN ZONE 0, USE- 3ANIE VACUA E ENC^LENT OSURE BUCK MOUNTAIN RD )B R. 679) 1Rl RAN .PER INSTE6200911247 =r OUMPSTER ENCLOSURE J WHEELS -FOP \f ♦ (TYP) \ MIN SPACE STYP, C+NOPY TEO LIGHT 1NPi pArrriAILL 15 Ft. Property ine Setback OAffi 1 3601358 060,018 06r6ox) 600'5Tn3 E IRF. ni,. CAP � 1 4��� 'fi rAie ppP1`\ems _' 11- - s, ,N,5 \\ \ I , PAY STALLS Owner/Landlord Approval 6801 Mount Hermon Church Rd, Ste C, Durham, NC 27705 • (P) 919-552-86W Page 1 of 6 Rebecca James - RE: [EXTERNAL] - Take 5 Car Wash - Buck Mountain Road From: Blake Smith <basmith@pennoni.com> To: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 3/9/2023 11:28 AM Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] - Take 5 Car Wash - Buck Mountain Road Cc: "Douglas R. Kennedy" <dkennedy@Pennoni.com>, Diana Milian <DMilian@Penn... Attachments: DRVBR2022032 SUP Concept Landscape Plan-Rev.pdf; DRVBR2022032 SUP Site Plan - Rev.pdf; 22085 Take 5 CW Roanoke Exterior Elevations 03.09.2023.pdf Rebecca, I think Doug Kennedy copied you on the VDOT Access Management Exception submittal to VDOT yesterday. We have made a couple of adjustments for additional traffic mitigation, including decreasing the size of the existing entrance which moves it a few feet further away from Franklin Road, and decreasing the number of car wash stacking lanes to two instead of 3. Attached is the new SUP Plan and Landscape Plan reflecting those changes. Also attached are the architectural renderings for the car wash building, as requested. Please let me know if we will be on track with the March 10 application schedule. Thanks. -Blake Blake Smith, PE, LEED, AP Principal Engineer S M IT.� DWISICIXOFPEI MQM_ 14901 Bogle Dr Suite 202 I Chantilly, VA 20151 Direct: +1 (703) 956-6204 I Mobile: •fi1.1703) 593-0299 www.oennoni.com l basmith@pennoni.com From: Rebecca lames <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 9:30 AM To: Blake Smith <basmith@pennoni.com> Cc: Douglas R. Kennedy<dkennedy@Pennoni.com>; Diana Milian <DMilian@Pennoni.com>; Ethan Mindrebo <EMindrebo@Pennoni.com>; Greg R. Deubler <GDeubler@Pennoni.com>; Denise Sowder file :///C:/Users/rjames/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/6409C2F9PO2 DOMAINM-Z_P... 3/10/2023 VDEITVirginia of Transportation February 2015 ACCESS MANAGEMENT EXCEPTION REQUEST: AM-E ACCESS MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS 24 VAC 30-73 SECTION 120 Submitted by: Douglas R. Kennedy, PE - Pennoni for the Applicant Boing US Holdco Inc Date: March 13, 2023 Email Address: DKennedy@Pennoni.com Phone: 703-840-4830 Address: 3434 Buck Mountain Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 Project Name: Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke Rte # 679 Locality: Roanoke Co. Description of Project: The applicant proposes to redevelop the Willow Tree Antiques to a one -tunnel automatic car wash and maintain right in/out access to Buck Mt Road. The proposed access is an existing driveway within 70 feet of the US 220 traffic signal. The US 220 signal is to be modified to remove turn conflicts with site access maintained; The proposed use site traffic has minimal change to the overall signal operations and alt. access is not feasible. Mitigation proposed for site signing and entrance design. VDOT District: Salem Area Land Use Engineer: Steven B. Mullins - PE NOTES: (1). Submit this form and any attachments to one of the District's Area Land Use Engineers. (2). See Section 120 of the Regulations for details on the requirements, exceptions, and exception request review process. (3). Attach additional information as necessary to justify the exception request(s). (4). If a traffic engineering study is required, the decision on the request will be based on VDOT engineering judgment. (5). Use the LD-440 Design Exception or the LD-448 Design Waiver forms for design and engineering standards, e.g. radius, grade, sight distance. See IIM-LD-227 on VDOT web site for additional instructions. Select the Exception(s) Being Requested Exception to the shared commercial entrance requirement. (Access M. Regulations Section 120 C.2) Reason for exception: A. An agreement to share the entrance could not be reached with adjoining property owner. Attached: Written evidence that adjoining property owner will not share the entrance. B. Physical constraints: topography, adjacent hazardous land use, stream, wetland, other. Specify constraint: Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. Exception to the vehicular connection to adjoining undeveloped property requirement. (Section 120 C.4) Reason for exception: A. Physical constraints: topography, adjacent hazardous land use, stream, wetland, other. Specify constraint: Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial photo or topographic map. B. Other reason: 1 February 2015 Exception to the commercial entrance shall not be located within the functional area of an intersection requirement. (See Regulation Section 120 C. 1; Appendix F, Rd Design Manual) Attached: A traffic engineering study documenting that the operation of the intersection and public safety will not be adversely impacted. EXCEPTION TO THE SPACING STANDARDS FOR: • Commercial entrances; intersections/median crossovers (Table 2-2); • Commercial entrances/intersections near interchange ramps (Tables 2-3, 2-4); or • Corner clearance (Figure 4-4). Appendix F, Road Design Manual Information on the Exception Request ON A STATE HIGHWAY Functional classification: Principal Arterial: ® Minor Arterial: ® Collector: © Local: Posted speed limit: 40 mph ▪ NEAR AN INTERCHANGE RAMP (Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) ▪ CORNER CLEARANCE (Submittal of a traffic engineering study required) Type of intersection/entrance: Signalized ® Unsignalized ® Full Access ® Partial Access Required spacing distance 250 ft Proposed spacing distance 109 ft Requested exception: Reduction in required spacing 141 ft REASON FOR EXCEPTION: A. To be located on an older, established business corridor along a highway where existing spacing did not meet the standards prior to 7/1/08 or 10/14/09. (Regulation Section 120 C.3.c) Attached: Dated aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location. B. Not enough property frontage to meet spacing standard, but the applicant does not want a partial access right-in/right-out entrance. (Section 120 C.3.f) Attached: A traffic engineering study documenting that left turn movements at the entrance will not have a negative impact on highway operation or safety. C. To be located within a new urbanism mixed use type development. (Section 120 C.3.d) Attached: The design of the development and compliance with intersection sight distance. D. The proposed entrance meets the signal warrants but does not meet the signalized intersection spacing standard. The applicant requests an exception to the spacing standard. Attached: A traffic engineering study that (i) evaluates the location's suitability for a roundabout and (ii) provides documentation that the proposed signal will not impact safety and traffic flow. (Section 120 C.5) 2 February 2015 E. The development's 2nd (or additional) entrance does not meet the spacing standards but is necessary for the streets to be accepted into the secondary system. (Section 120 C.3.e) Attached: Information on the development that identifies the location of entrances. F. To be located within the limits of a VDOT and locality approved access management corridor plan. Attached: Aerial photo of corridor identifying proposed entrance/intersection location. (Sect 120 C.3.b) FOR VDOT USE ONLY Recommendation on Exception Request: Approve Deny' Date: Area Land Use Engineer or: Name Remarks: Exception Request Action: Approved Denied Date: District Administrator or Designee: Name (and position if Designee) Remarks: District Staff: Please email copy to Bradley.Shelton©VDOT.Virginia.gov 3 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING JUSTIFICATION STUDY TAKE 5 CAR WASH ACCESS AT RTE 679 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 3434 BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD, ROANOKE COUNTY, VA 24018 VDOT AM-E REQUEST FOR COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE SPACING WAIVER FOR SPACING ON A COLLECTOR AT LESS THAN 250 FT FOR TYPE 4 ACCESS VA ROUTE 679 (BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD) AND FOR PROXIMITY TO SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (US 220, FRANKLIN RD) Introduction Boing US Holdco, Inc. (The Applicant) is pursuing a Special Use Permit for the existing Willow Tree Antiques site for redevelopment as a Take 5 Car Wash. The total 1.973 acres is proposed in the C-2 (High Intensity Commercial District) for a one tunnel automatic car wash facility, to be operated by the Take 5 Companies. The site includes the Buck Mountain Road (Va. Route 679) frontage southwest of US 220 (Franklin Road) at the Franklin Road/Buck Mountain Road/Stable Drive/Clearbrook Lane traffic signal. The location of the site is shown on Figure 1. For the purposes of the Access Management Exception, the redevelopment is proposed to include up to 5,130 sf facility to accommodate a one -bay automatic car wash, with approximately 23 parking spaces for car service and employees. The Proposed Conceptual site plan would include modifications to the existing commercial entrance on Buck Mt. Road to accommodate a VDOT entrance adjacent to the US 220 signal. The on -site circulation as right in/out is maintained, and traffic circulation includes 2 drive lanes to the pay stalls with counterclockwise access to the wash. The proposed AM-E is submitted for the proposed Take 5 car wash entrance location on Buck Mountain Road within 50 feet of the US 220 signal. The proposed location of the three-legged entrance was established to reflect the existing entrance for the property. In initial discussion with VDOT staff, new access to the Principal Arterial, US 220, was not encouraged, to avoid adding new conflict locations on the 4-lane divided arterial. With the limited length of frontage on Buck Mountain Road, (at 79 Feet) and along US 220 (at app. 310 Feet), alternative access to the site is not available, as outlined in the alternatives section. This Access Management Exception is being submitted for the entrance on Va. Route 679 since the new access is approximately 109 feet from the adjoining US 220 centerline and approximately 141 feet from the Valley Star Credit Union entrance (3452 Buck Mountain Road). Additionally, with the existing/proposed access, the driveway is located within the influence area of the US 220 signal, as the driveway is within the turn lane storage for turns from eastbound Buck Mountain Road to US 220. The VDOT roadway improvements for the corridor are under final design to be implemented in Roanoke County to improve signal efficiency on US 220. The spot safety improvements are part of the VDOT project 0220-960-50 to enhance the traffic operations at the signal and restrict side street throughs at the signal. The project introduced "thru-cut" design concept to redirect side street throughs to turn left or right to increase signal efficiency by reducing side street green times. The project has a total budget of $16.1 million and is expected to commence in late 2023. The technical justification provides documentation of the road context, planned improvements, and previous access conditions. The justification also includes a traffic summary of the existing and Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 2 of 19 future peak hour operations, with the proposed site based on the derived site operations envisioned by the Applicant based on review of average car wash sites operated by Driven Brands. The AM- E also includes review of the safety conditions based on historical crash data, and review of alternatives and site mitigation suggested with the proposed use. The existing site entrance is proposed to be modified with the proposed Take 5 Car Wash development, as shown on the Concept Site Plan on Figure 2. FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION J !� T F —uaFT— f.^ /. r Spa Works i t Tempurar y closed Willow Tree Antiques 8 Primitfves,�' S" Psychic Readings Source: Roanoke Co VA GIS mapping One View & Google Maps Clearbrook Elementary School Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Er ▪ .04400 TAS PARCEL. ID DM ..cU-220 W APIRI/YSYiii EOLta7R1 FAIR 09YEE3 CREC/T IlRk?11 Mx; 941.281E9C110 RTA.W. 09041klYE VA ZONE- a USE BRry:4' VACUUM EQUIPMENT E!fCLosuIE FIGURE 2: CONCEPT SITE PLAN BUCK MOUNTAIN. RD SS.R. ST9I PAR;a(pe IWPIH wrr fERNNSIIi 200910247 • OyMPSTEf ENCLOSURE V+wtEELS OP fTYPj !.,GULIM SPACE ti. ITYPi \l CANOPY-J. MOUNTED LIGHT • :AXP.ARX»iT. p7 0&4L 1-0n. PJP1 !TOWetW£€YIBORRO lW SCOE010SAKS S.iC N▪ x sAa+cRavE BR RaO ME vA mtF r� Page 3 of 19 PAL MARI-14E41 £5: ATEHLIsw£ss rRusr OB2U1i1 101 5% • u�eulc$i dcYEVffisthw I,41KFLAWE .9lTTii RpDVYE NA ZONE D2S y f ALK EVIC1 v. ate: *DAWNS DEP57iG 35 E SA Ki/..WAY. SYKYG tAr r- OSE SCROX Background A traffic statement to develop the range of trips for the commercial uses and compare to national averages and the existing Antiques use was submitted in advance of the AM-E in October 2022 by Pennoni. The conclusions were that the proposed change of use did not substantially change site volumes in relation to existing traffic. The trip generation analysis noted that there is not a large data set for car washes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) for automatic car washes (Land Use Code 948), and the data varies between tunnels and building size. No data for AM and Daily trips is published in ITE for LUC 948, and PM data is limited to 3 studies so the derivation of trips was determined from the Applicant 's sales experience data was used as the basis for the trip generation derivation. Based on the operator's expectations, Pennoni extrapolated the average daily use data in the ITE Trip Generation Manual with other sites analysis performed for Take 5 Express sites in Virginia. The effort included reviewing the ITE trip rate data base from the appropriate land use codes and trip variables and reviewing the hourly traffic trends for 1 car wash site in the ITE Appendix. With the high customer demand of 100 customers, the peak hour and Daily trips were estimated at 6-10 Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 4 of 19 customers per hour. Other similar sites expect 4-8 customer per hour, so Pennoni used the high end of customer trips per day. Take 5 does not yet operate a site in Virginia, so review of nationwide averages for sales at 30 sites was reviewed. The average Saturday data was refined. Pennoni utilized a derived rate per tunnel based on Saturday average sales for a Driven Brands Tier 2 site (i.e. stand-alone car wash without co -branded oil lube and vehicle service activities). The site activities were approximately 200 weekday Daily trips and 350 weekend (Saturday trips) for the subject site, which were comparable to the derived empirical retail and office uses for the Willow Tree Antiques an on -site palm reader. VDOT input and responses were update in February 2023, based on more refined Saturday activities, which highlighted VDOT concerns that access to Buck Mountain Road should not negatively impact the proposed VDOT signal improvements for the US 220 corridor. On initial review, VDOT supported a higher weekend estimate based on review of average sales data and requested the Applicant provide a detailed capacity analysis as part of the AM-E review to quantify the traffic operations with the site. The email correspondence is included as Attachment A. Relevant Design Criteria The relevant VDOT access spacing criteria is summarized in Table 1 from the VDOT Road Design Manual (Table 2-2). The partial access crossing Type 4 would require 250 feet spacing to not require a VDOT AM-E. Additionally, as noted on the AM-E form, the Exception is requested due to the proximity to the adjacent signal, as noted in Section 120.C.1 of the code. TABLE 1: VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F COMMERCIAL ACCESS SPACING Functional Classification Design Speed {See Note 2) Minimum Spacing (Distance) in Feet Type 1 (Signalized) Type 2 {Unsignalizedl Full Crossover) Type 3 (Full Access /Directional Crossover} Type 4 (Partial Access) 5 30 mph 660 440 225 200 Collector 35 to 45 mph 660 440 335 250 2 50 mph 1.050 660 445 360 TABLE 2-2 MINIMUM SPACING STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ACCESSES, INTERSECTIONS AND MEDIAN CROSSOVERS` Road Context Franklin Road (US 220) is a four -lane divided Other Principal Arterial southeast of the Blue Ridge Parkway interchange with signalized median crossovers in the vicinity at Buck Mountain Road/Stable Road and at Indian Grave Road SW/Clearbrook Village Lane. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH and Franklin Road does not have direct access to the adjacent parcels south of Buck Mountain Road signal. VDOT AADT from 2021 has 26,000 VPD (factored) south of the Parkway to the Franklin County line, with 27,000 VPD weekdays. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 5 of 19 Buck Mountain Road (Va. Route 679) is a two-lane Major Collector west of US 220 between the Parkway and US 220 with a 40 MPH speed limit with 9,700 VPD ADT reported in 2021 (factored) and 6,700 vpd west of the Parkway underpass. The road has a raised median adjacent to the site for app. 275 feet which restricts left turns to/from the property and to the adjacent Valley Star Credit Union access. The Credit Union has a separate driveway with a left turn lane approximately 480 feet from the US 220 signal. The Buck Mountain Road existing site entrance is located immediately west of the signal with approximately 45 feet of stacking from the entrance center to the existing painted stop bars. The Buck Mountain Road approach is designated for a separate right turn lane to SB US Rte. 220 and a shared through/left and left for dual turns to northbound US Rte. 200. No pedestrian facilities are provided at the existing signal. VDOT Historical traffic volumes for US 220 and Buck Mountain Road are attached in Appendix B, which show annual growth at less than 2 percent annually prior to COVID-19 in the last 10 years. The VDOT Functional Plan for the study area is shown below in Figure 3, which shows US 220 as an Other Principal Arterial and Buck Mountain Horner Road as major collectors. Site FIGURE 3: VDOT FUNCTIONAL PLAN MAP Clem FC Prime — Interstate — Other Freeways and Expressways — Other Principal Arterial — Minor Arterial — Major Collector Minor Collector — Interstate Rarnp — Other Freeways and Expressways Ramp — Other Principal Arterial Ramp — Minor Arterial Ramp For context the entrance has been used for the Antique shop based on aerials from Google Map before the summer of 2008, as shown in Figure 4, with the raised median added after 2011 for Route 679, before the construction of the Valley Star Credit Union. The aerial was grainy at the signal, but later Google Earth photos confirmed the median was added after April of 2011. The exception to the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F Figure 4-11 spacing is requested based on one (1) of criteria in the Code 24VAC30-73-120: • C.3.c Established Business Corridor: c. On older, established business corridors along a highway in a locality where existing entrances and intersections did not meet the spacing standards prior to July 1, 2008 for Site Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 6 of 19 principal arterials or October 14, 2009 for minor arterials, collectors, or local streets, spacing for new entrances and intersections may be allowed by the district administrator's designee that is consistent with the established spacing along the highway, provided that the permit applicant submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an exception to the spacing standards that includes evidence that reasonable efforts were made to comply with the other access management requirements of this section including restricting entrances within the functional areas of intersections, sharing entrances with and providing vehicular and pedestrian connections between adjoining properties, and physically restricting entrances to right -in or right -out or both movements. Therefore, the justification satisfies the condition that the driveway is located on an older, established business corridor along a highway where existing spacing did not meet the standards prior to October 14, 2009. (Regulation Section 120.C.3.c). Note that since the use is changing, our engineering experience is that the entrance is not `grandfathered', so an AM-E is required. FIGURE 4: 2008 AERIAL CONDITIONS AT BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD Source: Google Earth, October 2008, accessed by Pennoni Planned Improvements VDOT is proceeding with final plan to modify the Buck Mountain Road signal as part of project 0220-960-50 m501 to enhance the traffic operations at the signal and restrict side street throughs at the signal. The generalized plan is shown in Figure 5 to install channelized islands in the S and N quadrants with an island in the median to allow a future pedestrian crosswalk with the signal operation changes. The revision are part of the Route 220 Corridor intersection Improvements in the City of Roanoke and Roanoke, Franklin, and Henry Counties. The project introduced "thru- Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 7 of 19 cut" design concept to redirect side street throughs to turn left or right to increase signal efficiency by reducing side street green times. The project has a total budget of $16.1 million and is expected to commence in late 2023. Both signals adjacent to the site are proposed for upgrades for the VDOT project, which includes 5 other signals locations on US 220 and the 2 median enhancements to the north adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway/US 220 interchange junction. 0 FIGURE 5: VDOT BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD US 220 IMPROVEMENTS Ror WelseeweeMee r yo, E8 "1 h 2 '¢n1 JF'OT'k�- ,die �r iS RCP �4jg-�a... ti V-04 ZA4 ®r j� a --, W J 11 L� Lai ............we _. �_.... �0(0511,10,011 n05Q743J8 •tl33,. Source: VDOT Ica ti4 4 sA `a B, Cisme as _ evil) CCorrs trrlxlion Sams 3e33.4Q Begin Cori/:461mA 5031348 S 40" 2r 44 E CONSTR. -•-•--- _d a r Qom- 159- fr53`� y� ssppy� Ssr+ `• rUnwire stenni. Sir&- SPRONQ bone Ma1,10.rffe e.SMe Na 2+6 7.LO/ry Rq` ea ffrOf,RK. Lf#en dLy� A ua.c r,.lraad ® smais,+Me'1 n vac rrre pi l`Vt A g4.0 L5d NyL • udrsa owt wawa +was Q SraaC+haa sraawcs3 +as srd for (i Fog4 Sre.GNICYlwffd Site The following sections are organized to provide the justification of the proposed Access Management Exception on the basis of Sections C.1 and Section C3.c and include: 1. Existing Spacing 2. Section 110 Application a. Safety b. Use c. Maintenance 3. Section 120 Application a. Six Access Management Criteria 4. Support Materials a. Site Trip Generation Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 8 of 19 b. Existing Volumes c. Traffic Forecasts d. Traffic Operations with Planned Improvements e. Potential Mitigation f. Alternatives g. Impacts to Adjacent Intersections Existing Spacing The existing spacing is summarized in Table 2 for Buck Mountain Road. TABLE 2: ROUTE 679 PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING FOR TAKE 5 CAR WASH Location Ai VDOT Entrance Type Proposed Spacing (1) (ft.) [Existing] AM-E Status (2) 3452 Buck Mt. Rd (Valley Star Credit Union) Type 4 -- -- 3434 Buck Mt. Rd (Subject site) Type 4 141 ft. [146 ft] NO < 250 ft (3) Franklin Rd (4' 5) Type 1 109 ft. [104 ft] NO < 250 ft (1) Spacing per Pennoni measurements (2) Spacing criteria measured from intersection centerline with VDOT 40 MPH Design Collector Road (3) Proposed entrance centerline shifts dimension by 10 feet. (4) For eastbound Route 679, entrance in functional area of signal with raised median at 42 feet from stop bar. (5) With existing signal, stacking from stop bar at 47 feet. Entrance located in right turn lane to SB US 220. Section 110 Application Access management requirements are established by 24VAC30-73, Access Management Regulations (December 5, 2013). Section 110, Paragraphs Al through A3 establish criteria for evaluating the continued feasibility of an existing entrance. Section 110, Paragraph establishes the events at which an existing commercial entrance may be reviewed for continued feasibility, among these is, "... rezoning or other local legislative action involv[ing] a change in use of property (Paragraph C1)." The proposed change of use does not change zoning but would require County approvals. The proposed commercial entrance is therefore noted under the criteria established in Section 110, Paragraph A. A) Safety Utilizing crash data obtained from Virginia Roads (vdot.maps.arcgis.com) and AADT data published by VDOT, Pennoni undertook a crash analysis of Buck Mountain Road (VA Rte. 679) and the US 220 segments adjacent to the Route 679/ between Iron Place and Industrial Drive (VA Rte. 2735). Crash data available from Virginia Road Crash Tableau covers the Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 9 of 19 period 2017 through 2019 (pre COVID-19) and for the most current 3 years (2020-2022) and is presented graphically in Figure 6 with 105 total incidents over the last 3 years. The VDOT Crash Tableau reveals only one crash along the site frontage of Buck Mountain Road, a rear end accident in October 2019 to the west of the site entrance with an afternoon incident with the driver following too close. The US 220 signal and the Buck Mountain Road links do experience high rates of crashes at the signal, but primarily are associated with the mainlines movement on the arterial, and not the Buck Mountain Road approach. The total summaries are shown in the Attachment C. There was one incident reported in February 2022, a sideswipe, without injuries reported west of the subject site, with darkness as a factor at the end of the median at the left turn to the Valley Star Credit Union access. The only reported visible injury was an incident from August 2019, a head on crash adjacent to the median but west of the right in/out access to the Valley Star Credit Union access. FIGURE 6: BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD CRASH DATA HISTORY WNW When 0.0 W.,,..- neh arm .enhen Nazi -a 3434 B!uck,,Mt. Rd Source: Virginia Crash Tableau, last accessed March 2023 Crash Serethy B V%rde OP.). • pmo Prapmr Gwna;x. onir ▪ C Nenviwie InJ,y ✓ A Severe Inky ^v Mashes C CLchSIramtrAsa Impasse ass map The sight distance for the entrance looking west is adequate and will be documented with the site plan submittal. B) Use The proposed commercial entrance is located and designed to support a VDOT Commercial entrance for uses allowed under the C-2 zoning. A separate truck access is not proposed or required. C) Maintenance The proposed commercial entrance location would not change VDOT maintenance obligations. Section 120 Application Access management requirements are established by 24VAC30-73, Access Management Regulations (December 5, 2013). Section 120, Paragraph C3, a through f, establishes the exceptions to the spacing standards for entrances and intersections. These are briefly reviewed with regard to proposed commercial entrance for the subject site; the exception identified as subparagraphs c. and f. are the only applicable exceptions. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 10 of 19 a. Existing Entranced Proffered Prior to October 14, 2009 — Not Applicable. Subject parcel and proposed entrance subject to pending Roanoke County SUP approval. However, the existing entrance has been in place since before 2008 as note in the aerials through Google Maps, creating a right in/only site access. The raised median on Buck Mountain Road were installed after 2011, prior to the Credit Union site plan operations. b. Access Management Corridor Plans — Not Applicable. Subject parcel and proposed entrance are located in an area that is not subject to `grandfathered` access management corridor plans. c. Existing Spacing on Established Business Corridor — APPLICABLE. Existing entrances and entrance spacings pre -date October 2009. Proposed entrance modifies an existing entrance. Proposed entrance is located in the functional area of an intersection, so a technical analysis is performed. Subject site does not have the option to share entrances with adjoining properties, as noted in the alternatives. d. Development within a Designated Urban Development — Not Applicable. Subject parcel is located in a planned C-2 High Intensity Commercial uses and is located out of the 2010 Roanoke Urban Area boundary line (smoothed), which is located north of Buck Mountain Road. e. Acceptance into Secondary System of State Highways — Not applicable. Subject parcel fronts Buck Mountain Road. No new street acceptance is proposed with the use. f. Insufficient Frontage to Meet Spacing Standards — APPLICABLE. The site only has 79 feet of frontage on Buck Mountain Road and 310 feet along US 220. a) Trip Generation To verify trips in relation to the average trip rates in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Using the peak hour activities at approximately 8-10 vehicles on average, and hourly activities occurring from 7 AM to 8 PM, this Take 5 car wash could average 7.7 vehicle per hour, or 100 customers per day. This would equate to 200 trips per day (in + out). Adding the employee traffic at 5 staff would result in 210-215 trips per day in and out. While the derivation is higher than the applicant's expected data, it provides a range of trips to compare for site impacts. For site assignments, Pennoni increased site trip by 15 percent for the AM peak and doubled for the PM peak to assess maximum impacts. The Daily trips reflect approximately 250 weekday and 385 VPD for Saturday. The proposed land use plan submitted with the subject rezoning applications provides for two land bays, designated as Land Bay A for the previous Cowles site and Land Bay B for the Station Plaza property. The site trips are summarized in Table 3. The pass -by trips for the assignments are based on 35 percent of the total trips, to be conservative. Previous submittals had 50 percent pass -by. All trips are assigned to the subject driveway. Saturday trips are increased from the October 2022 statement to reflect the average sales, which results in 28 peak hour trips in and Daily trips of 388, with employees included. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County TABLE 3: PROPOSED TAKE 5 TRIP GENERATION Page 11 of 19 Weekday Saturday Land Use ITE LUC (Land Use Code) Size Variable Notes Daily Trips Daily Vehicles AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips Daily Vehicles SAT Peak Hour Trips Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit PREVIOUS ESTIMATE (1) Oct-22 214 107 6 6 9 9 357 178 19 22 ITE ESTIMATES Autiomated Car Wash 948 1 Tunnel ' (2) N/A N/A N/A N/A 39 39 N/A N/A 21 20 PROPOSED TRIP DERIVIATION Autiomated Car Wash 948 1 Tunnel r (3) 251 125 8 7 18 18 388 194 28 28 PROPOSED USE TOTALS (2) 251 125 8 7 18 18 388 194 28 28 ITE llth Edition Pass -By Percentages (3) 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Pass By -88 -44 -2 -2 -6 -6 -136 -68 -10 -10 Internal Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED PROPOSED USE NEW TRIPS I — 163 81 6 5 12 12 252 126 Calculations by Pennoni, Source ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) (1) October 24, 2022 letter (2) For subject use from LUC 948. See Attacmrnt A for derived Daily trip worksheets. (3) Pass -By not included in 11th Edition Attachments. Used as lowest of in/out trips, Daily % estimated as average from weekday as retail uses. b) Existing Volumes For the existing conditions, Pennoni utilized the long-range forecasts from the US 220 study, which included weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes for a 2040 design year. Volumes are summarized in Attachment D from VDOT with turns for the Route 220 signal. The forecasts are adjusted to reflect the restrictions of side street turns and the right turns were coded in the signal timing as a yield condition. For Saturday operations, Pennoni had Quality Counts LLC, a VDOT certified count firm, to collect 4-hour midday counts for existing conditions at both the signal and the turns at the Willow Tree antiques entrance on Saturday, February 11, 2023. The count summaries are included in Attachment E. The peak hour for the Saturday occurred at the signal between 12:15 and 1:15 PM. Turns ranged from 82 to 153 vehicles per hour on Buck Mountain Road with 257 trips on SB US Route 220 to the east at Stable Road and Clearbrook Lane. The counts also turns for the Willow Tree Antique with approximately 26-31 turns in/out for the midday peak. The counts also noted that some drivers executed a left turn out at the site and turned into the opposite direction on Buck Mountain Road and turned into the Valley Star Credit Union entrance. The turns occurred with gaps to travel in the opposite direction of eastbound Route 679, with one occurring at 11:45 AM during the driveway peak. when no one was approaching on right turn lane on eastbound Mountain Road. Outbound rights also waited for gaps in the US Route 220 signal side street green gaps or until the end of the green phase for lefts to northbound US 220. For existing weekday conditions, Pennoni calculated that the effective growth from VDOT 2019 peak hour link volumes to the projected 2040 volumes was 0.88 percent annually. The existing weekday conditions were calculated by applying a negative annual growth of 0.88% from 2040 to 2023, to determine `existing' volumes with side street throughs restricted. Since weekday counts were not updated, the turns for the site at the Willow Tree Antiques were derived as half of the estimates from the October 2022 calculations as office and retail from ITE. The conservative approach from ITE was used to not over -estimate site trip credits. The effective AM and PM peak hour trips were used as 5 AM (two-way) and 12 PM peak hour trips. The weekend trips used from the 2023 counts with 26 in and 30 outbound trips for the Saturday peak hour. Existing volumes are shown in the top of Figure 7A for the weekday and 7B for Saturday conditions. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 12 of 19 34600 EXISTING VOLUMES 2023 BACKGROUND VOLUMES 2030 WITH GROWTH W/O SITE CHANGES TAKE 5 SITE TRIPS (PASS -BY + NEW TRIPS) W/O CREDIT TOTAL VOLUMES 2030 WITH TAKE 5 SITE 0 00 3]' (399) —. (8) z 140 384 (305) r m 0 00 .— 441 (349) 140 8 (18) Buck Mounts" 2 VA Route 679 250 0 N 0 0 366 (459) — (18) z El 250 445 (359) VA Route 679 0 0 0 00 0 m r1 a M a 00 o In a a m J 1 L a 1 (8) El F r 7 t r 153 (143) —t N m N 0% 00 n 00 168 (265) z 00 LA n M a -I LA 34500 0 N N an N. In In a a -I a -I a -I N. N N 00 N 0 0 0 m 37300 37400 1 (8) a � 0 Lrl 90 il r t r 00 0 a O 0 0 37300 37400 Legend: Peak Hr Volume: AM (PM) Average Daily Traffic: ADT �rPBrrn�r" TAKE 5 ROANOKE AM-E ROANOKE, VIRGINIA WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 7A Project #DRVB R220032 Mar-23 Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 13 of 19 EXISTING VOLUMES 2023 BACKGROUND VOLUMES 2030 WITH GROWTH W/O SITE CHANGES TAKE 5 SITE TRIPS (PASS -BY + NEW TRIPS) W/O CREDIT TOTAL VOLUMES 2030 WITH TAKE 5 SITE 0 00 (260) —. (24) z 690 - (242) M 0 Iry (299) —. (24) z 690 • (274) r m M 0 0 Buck Mountain Rd 500 - (28) VA Route 679 - (278) 0 Buck Mountain Rd 7 VA Route 679 500 0 27600 ▪ N ^l ■ 00 I, N - (4) - (3) J 1 L • (1) i n 7 t r (115) s N o Let m (85) =— (91) z 25000 0 0 29800 a -I N lD O I. I. i (5) 13 ) 1 L • (1) ri 7 t r (130) s r o (199) z 29400 0 oo 00I 0 29600 ■ 15) 13) 1 L (1) 29200 0 7 t r • g 0 Legend: Peak Hr Volume: AM (PM) Average Daily Traffic: ADT �iPBrrn�r" TAKE 5 ROANOKE AM-E ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SATURDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 7B Project #DRVB R220032 Mar-23 Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 14 of 19 c) Traffic Forecasts For the future year conditions Pennoni used a 2030 forecast year (six years after the opening in 2024), and increased traffic at 1 percent per year for the US 220 throughs and 2 percent annual growth on Buck Mountain Road. The higher growth on Route 679 reflects the VDOT historical trends. The future volumes also include modifying the side street turns for the restriction of throughs with the VDOT project. The Saturday volumes on Buck Mountain Road were rerouted as rights and turns to Stable Road. Future volumes without the site are shown in the middle of the figures. For site trips, Pennoni assigned the new peak hour trips in Table 3 with the proposed access as right in/out access. Site trip distributions were derived based on the existing daily traffic links with the distributions in Table 4, recognizing that U-turns are required for site access. Three levels of site assignments were performed: • Credit for existing site trips (as a subtraction of trips in and out to the Willow Tree Antiques and subtraction of turns at US Route 220 for balancing), • Addition of new external site trips with the proposed car wash, • Addition of pass -by trips as new turns at US 220 and subtraction of throughs on Franklin Road. Directional distributions are based on the future US 220 north/south directional volumes. TABLE 4: PROPOSED TAKE 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Direction External Pass -By (3) Buck Mountain Road West (1) 10% 0% US 220 North 40% 60% US 220 North U turn (2) 15% 0% US 220 South 35% 40% Total 100% 100% (1) U-turn outbound shown as rights to SB US 220, U-turn, and NB left at Buck Mt Rd signal; (2) App. 1/4 of trip shown as U-turn outbound shown as rights to SB US 220, U-turn, and NB through at Buck Mt Rd signal; (3) Pass -by trip based on peak hour directional NB/SB splits (i.e., NB AM at 71% NB, 40% PM) The total site trips are shown in the third row of Figure 7 for the weekday peaks and in Figure 7B for Saturday. The total trips with the proposed Take 5 site add the net new site trips to the base conditions, as shown at the bottom of the figure. Note that the effective ADT on US 220 is at 37,300 VPD which is consistent with the long-term forecasts from the VDOT improvement project. The Saturday counts on US 220 are at 74 percent of the weekday PM volumes for Franklin Road and at 73 percent of the PM peak Buck Mountain Road volumes for 2040. Site trips are shown by type in Attachment F. d) Traffic Operations with Planned Improvements The 2030 projected AM and PM peak hour volumes and proposed lane geometry with the site plan were used to calculate the levels of service (LOS) and back of queues for the signalized intersection Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 15 of 19 of Franklin Road/Buck Mountain Road and Stable Road/Clearbrook Lane. The calculations were performed in Synchro 11 with the VDOT improvement project, which eliminates throughs on Buck Mountain Road and restricted left turns to one lane to northbound Route 220. as part of the rezoning review with the delay and LOS results of the analyses are shown in Table 5. Synchro worksheet outputs are included in Attachment G for the weekday peaks and Saturday. LOS grades are color coded with orange at LOS "E" and yellow at LOS "D", based on average delay, using the Highway Capacity Manual thresholds. TABLE 5: BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD US 220 LOS SUMMARY 2030 BACKGROUND 2030 TOTAL # Intersection Traffic ControlLane Storage Lengths (ft.) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec) 95th %Be Queue (ft.) LOS Delay (sec) 95th %Be Queue (ft.) LOS Delay (sec) 95th %Be Queue (ft) LOS Delay (sec.) 95th %Be Queue (ft) LOS Delay (sec.) 95th %Be Queue (ft) LOS Delay (sec.) 95th %Be Queue (ft) Group/ Approach Full- WidthTaper EFFEC 11VE Franklin Road (US 1 220) &Buck Mountain Road/ Stable Road Cycle Length 140s (Actuated Coordinated dwiog Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours; Actuated EB/L - - - E 66.9 246 E 76.7 #264 D 51.0 192 E 66.9 250 E 78.2 #273 D 50.9 188 EB/R 610 100 660 A 0.2 0 A 0.3 0 A 0.2 0 A 0.2 0 A 0.3 0 A 0.2 0 EB Buck Mountain Road LOS C 32.0 - C 27.0 - C 20.3 - C 32.0 - C 27.6 - C 20.2 - WB/LR - - D 50.4 D 53.3 D 43.0 D 50.3 D 53.3 D 42.9 E 56.9 15 - - 6 - - 24 - - 6 - - 24 E 56.7 15 WB Stable Road LOS D 50.4 - D 53.3 - D 50.7 - D 50.3 - D 53.3 - D 50.6 - NB/UL 640 105 690 A 5.7 n52 D 44.4 m152 B 12.4 63 A 5.7 n53 D 45.7 m156 B 12.4 63 NB/T B 12.5 #836 B 12.3 1201 C 26.9 567 B 12.6 #836 B 12.3 rr201 C 26.8 563 NB/LR 1010 - 1010 Uncoordinated assumed for Saturday Peak How)* NB US 220 LOS B 11.7 - B 17.8 - C 25.1 - B 11.7 - B 18.1 - C 25.0 SB/L 425 115 480 C 24.5 56 C 21.4 135 C 30.1 250 C 24.5 55 C 21.5 136 C 29.6 249 SB/1T - - - B 15.3 267 C 30.4 822 B 12.8 228 B 15.4 267 C 30.6 816 B 12.9 226 SB/R 190 155 265 B 12.5 39 B 11.6 35 A 9.9 23 B 12.6 39 B 11.7 35 A 10.0 24 SB US 220 LOS B 15.2 - C 28.0 - B 16.7 - B 15.3 - C 28.1 - B 16.7 - Overall B 15.0 - C 24.5 - C 21.3 - B 15.1 - C 24.8 - C 21.2 - 2 Buck Mountain Road &Site Entrance Unsigpalized EB/P - - - - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 EB/PR 535 100 585 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 EB Buck Mountain Road LOS - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - WB/T I 25 - I 25 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 WB Buck Mountain Road LOS - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - NB/LR I - - I - A 9.5 0 A 9.9 0 A 9.9 0 A 9.5 0 B 10.0 3 A 9.5 3 NB Site Entrance LOS A 9.5 - A 9.9 - A 9.9 - A 9.5 - B 10.0 - A 9.5 - Overall - 0.0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.0 - - 0.2 - - 0.4 - # 95th percentile volume exceeds capa ity, queue may be longer. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. * WeekdayAM/PM Peak Hour Signal Timing Data from VDOT Synchro Files (March 2023). Splits optimized for Saturday Signal Timing while maintaining 140s cycle length. As shown in table, the eastbound Buck Mountain Road left turn to northbound Franklin Road would operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "E" in the AM and PM peak and at a LOS "D" for the Saturday peak in the Background (with no change in site activities) and total conditions. The 95% percent Back of queue is 264 feet in Synchro with the site in the PM peak and 273 feet with the proposed site. Saturday back of queues are at approximately 190 feet. Right turns to Southbound Route 220 operate as a yield result in a LOS "A", so the overall approach grade is a LOS "C" for Buck Mountain Road with and with the Take 5 site. For Franklin Road, the northbound left turns operate at a LOS "D" for the PM peak hour with and without the site development. The overall Route 220 signal operates at a LOS "C" or better for the 3 peak hours, with the revised operation without side street through. However, the effective US 220 mainline queues extend past the available intersection storage. Site turns out of the driveway operate at LOS `B" or better unsignalized in synchro. The 95% back of queue extends back through the existing/proposed driveway. The LOS change in delay and back of queue do not change significantly between the scenarios. Additional modeling as SimTraffic to review the maximum back of queues was not performed for this analysis since the operations are shown as a sensitivity to define the area of influence for the signal operations on Buck Mountain Road. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 16 of 19 e) Potential Mitigation For the Take 5 site at Buck Mountain Road, the development team considered the following mitigation elements in the access design to reduce potential impacts and address the illegal left turns at the existing driveway: 1. Decrease entrance width from the approximately 42 ft driveway to a standard VDOT 30 ft -wide entrance to define travel routes and reduce potential turn confusion. This slightly increased the off -set from the Franklin Road signal by adjusting the entrance west. 2. Provide a minimum 25 ft radius at the entrance returns in and out. 3. To reduce driver decision for outbound trips, install the following signing adjacent to the entrance to provide clear wayfinding, subject to VDOT approval at site plan: i. Add a MUTCD R6-1R (One -Way) right sign in the existing Buck Mountain Road median island, ii. Add a MUTCD Stop sign R1-1 (30"x30") at the exit with a MUTCD R3-2 No left turn sign below, iii. Add a MUTCD R5-1 "Do Not Enter" Sign on the eastbound approach (facing the exit) on Buck Mountain Road west of the driveway 4. Demarcate pavement with paint marking as right turns at the exit 5. For on -site wayfinding, consider if a custom sign can be placed at the car wash exit (away from the entrance) to direct outbound trips "To Rte 679 W 220 N Turn right at Signal, U-Turn at Clearbrook Village" as an option to direct trips to turn right onto US 220 southbound as opposed to vehicles waiting to find a gap to turn out to the left turn lane queue to turn left at to northbound US 220. f) Alternatives As part of the VDOT Access Management spacing review, the Department identifies three components which influences intersection spacing criteria: 1. Functional Classification 2. Design Speed 3. Existing and Proposed Access Types The sensitivity of alternatives to satisfy the VDOT criteria are noted below. For the Take 5 site, we do not expect the functional classification, or design speeds to be changed, and the access type is already restricted as a right in/out access. Therefore, the only other alternative is to review access location for the property. The access scenarios are noted below: • Alternative Access to US 220 — Not Applicable as an alternative without adding turn lanes and introducing a new conflict location. The site frontage would not accommodate a turn lane for deceleration lane for a minimum 100-foot storage and 200 ft deceleration length for rural design speeds at 50 MPH. Adding a new conflict location on US 220 would potentially be possible but generally conflicts with the Franklin Road Corridor Access management goals. Spacing between partial driveways is allowed for a 45 MPH legal speed limit at 305 feet from the Buck Mountain Road centerline but adding a new conflict Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 17 of 19 location would impact the corridor safety. VDOT Access Management Type 4 access spacing is 495 feet for a Principal Arterial for speed limits at 50 MPH. • Alternative access to the south — Not feasible as the Clearbrook School is located immediately to the southeast of the site. No public street access is provided. • Alternative access to the west — Not feasible as the Clearbrook Park has frontage on the property's west side with no vehicular access. The access road to the park does not extend past the turnaround. • Alternative access to the northwest - Not possible with adjacent development. The 3452 Buck Mountain Road site was developed as drive through facility and is operating as the Valley Star Credit Union. The site plan does have a service drive adjacent to Buck Mountain Road, but the drive i used as one way out for the bank's drive through lane and is not wide enough for two-way traffic. And in reviewing the site plans for the adjacent property, the was no interparcel access easements established for the bank uses to allow the subject property at 3434 Buck Mountain Road to have an interparcel access. While interparcel access is desirable, the previous approvals did not provide a mechanism to provide the connection. The aerial site information of the adjacent parcels is shown in Figure 8. FIGURE 8: ADJACENT PROPERTY ACCESS AERIALS Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 18 of 19 g) Impact to Adjacent Intersections The proposed access as a right in/out has included mitigation in the current design concept. As part of the analysis, the site changes do not significantly change since operations for the weekday and weekend peak periods at Franklin Road. As noted in the existing condition, the trips to/from the Willow Tree Antiques site are comparable to the proposed car wash activities for the Take 5 site. The overall site volumes are 4.4 percent of the Buck Mountain Road background 2030 link volumes weekday and only 0.9 percent of the total traffic signal volumes at US 220. For the weekend peaks, site trips are 9.3 percent of the Route 679 link volumes for the Saturday peak and 1.7 percent of the total signal. The location of the driveway within the existing and proposed stacking from the Buck Mountain Road turns to US 220 does add conflicts for drivers to turn in/out of the subject site. However, as observed in the field for the weekends, the site traffic typically queue up and waits for gap in the turn queue before entering the roadway at the signal. Since the left turn storage extends through the entrance, the on - site design accommodates extra stacking in relation to existing parking lot access to reduce on -site circulation conflicts. Conclusions The following conclusions support the proposed entrance for the Take 5 Car Wash on VA Route 679: 1. The entrance at Buck Mountain Road is an existing condition that occurs on a developed corridor and has been in place prior to 2009. 2. The Take 5 Car Wash entrance is located at the same driveway that was proposed to remain with tr VDOT Route 220 corridor improvements for the Buck Mountain Road traffic signal as part of the VDOT Route 220 safety project (0220-960-50, m501). 3. The proposed reconstruction of the entrance slightly improves stacking by providing a narrower commercial entrance off -set to the west in relation to the existing driveway, and shifts the available stacking area from approximately 42 feet to 47 feet. 4. The proposed sit trips for the car wash are consistent with existing uses as antique store. Proposed trips for a Saturday peak are projected at 28 vehicles in and out, which is comparable to the existing trips at 24 in and 31 out for the Saturday peak hour. 5. The crash data at the signal does show an increased incident frequency on US 220, but the Buck Mountain Road eastbound approach crash occurrence have been slight in the last 6 years, with only 1 reported crash near the driveway, which was a rear end incident, not associated with site turns. 6. The traffic operations show minimal change in the back of queue with proposed VDOT improvements and the adjacent site driveway for the weekday and Saturday peak hours, in relation to the existing turns. Therefore, the access location within the functional area of the intersection has been quantified. 7. With the proposed access, additional signing and pavement marking are suggested with the site plan to promote right turns out to the existing right turn lane to southbound US 220. Take 5 Car Wash Buck Mountain Road VDOT Access Management Exception Spacing Traffic Engineering Justification Study Rte. 679, Roanoke County Page 19 of 19 8. Alternative site access for the subject site is not currently feasible with highway, public use, and easement constraints for all property boundaries. Based on the reasons listed above, the Access Management Exception for the proposed Take 5 Car Wash site entrance on Buck Mountain Road (Va. Route 679) should be approved by VDOT for spacing at less than 250 feet. Attachments A: Correspondence B: Historical Growth Trends C: Crash Data D: VDOT 2040 Traffic Volumes E: 2023 Saturday Traffic Counts F: Proposed Site Assignments G: 2030 Synchro Outputs U:\Accounts\DRVBR\DRVBR22032 - Take 5 Car Wash -Roanoke VA\DOC PREP \AM- E\PennoniTake5CarWash BuckMtRdUS220RoanokeCoVDOT AMExcep202303.docx 01N1•••_ verj-\L311 OF I .Ni •'`J �1 l[� • + • • - s 1 -,I I I-1 --I f :-o Lic. No. 21450 ,i t > 03/13/2023 w�� • N%.,(540�N1N�; Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Traffic Engineer Leesburg, VA Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Aerial Map Boing US Holdco, Inc. 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Lot Size: 1.97 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Car Wash —I Subject Site 1earbroo:‹ Park Clearbrook Park Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 3/16/2023 1:1,128 //V�IIJC".VJlll".U.Y.q Lidwr,3Ica, WU:Allld/ © II 660rto- ©o0 War ©io Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Zoning Map Boing US Holdco, Inc. 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Lot Size: 1.97 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Car Wash Subject Site Zoning C2 Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ROANO E Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 3/16/2023 1:1,128 /Clearbro: Park Clearbrook Park 5 35 Clearbrook Park 3434 5147 Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Future Land Use Map Boing US Holdco, Inc. 3434 Buck Mountain Rd Lot Size: 1.97 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Car Wash Subject Site Future Land Use Core Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 ROANOKE O N '�. VA Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 3/16/2023 1:1,128 ,77 /Clearbro. Park Clearbrook Park 5335 Clearbrook Park 3434 5147 iIVIIN11�11011 lllfllflullllllll eigeb - g- _ •- r414,„-- . II).V1. 1.1!"!!0!!"! rirfirn, _ • 4‘.41'j. .101-#.PAIP Aalr_ tree - J1 y - r ' z}'y M. )47 Crow Tree 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances SEC. 30-54. - C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-1. - Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. - Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -Family Dwelling * Two -Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University 1/6 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Automobile Dealership * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast * Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Commercial Indoor Amusement 2/6 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center* Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial * Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General Retail Sales Short-term Renal * Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses 3/6 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Car Wash * Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses 4/6 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799- 11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28- 16; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-54-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 5/6 3/31/22, 1:23 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) 6/6 4/21/23, 5:35 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances SEC. 30-58. - CVOD CLEARBROOK VILLAGE OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 30-58-1. - Purpose. The purpose of the Clearbrook village overlay district is to promote future development that is consistent with the current character of Clearbrook, and with the comprehensive plan future land use map and policies for this area. Future development in this district should respect the character and historical context of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Clearbrook School, and other social and cultural resources in Clearbrook area. The Clearbrook area has adequate public facilities, good road access, suitable topography, and land available for development or redevelopment. Recognizing these factors, the plan, and this district promote the creation of the Village of Clearbrook. Commercial development consistent with these district standards and the community plan design guidelines for the Clearbrook village commercial overlay district is encouraged, but strip commercial patterns of development are discouraged. Thus, the district allows a wide variety of commercial uses, but provides a high degree of emphasis on landscaping, building design, site design, and lighting and signage control. (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-58-2. - Creation of Overlay. (A) The Clearbrook village overlay district is created as an amendment to the official zoning map of the county. All regulations and standards contained herein shall apply to all parcels and land within the designated overlay district. (B) The boundaries of the overlay district as shown on the official zoning map may only be amended by action of the county board of supervisors pursuant to section 30-14 of this ordinance. (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00) Sec. 30-58-3. - Applicability and Administration. (A) The zoning administrator shall have the responsibility for determining compliance with these standards. In making any such determination, the zoning administrator shall consider the purposes of the Clearbrook village overlay district, and shall consider the extent to which the requested use or development substantially complies with the design guidelines for the Clearbrook village commercial overlay district adopted as part of the county community plan. If in the opinion of the zoning administrator, the use or development does not substantially comply with these design guidelines, the requested use or development shall, by decision of the zoning administrator, be considered a special use and shall require a special use permit pursuant to section 30-19 of this ordinance. about:blank 1/4 4/21/23, 5:35 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00) Sec. 30-58-4. - Permitted Uses and Use Restrictions. The uses permitted in the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be governed by the underlying zoning district in which the property is located as shown on the official zoning maps, except as otherwise modified below: (A) The following uses shall be prohibited within the Clearbrook village overlay district: 1. Civic Uses Park and Ride Facility Public Assembly 2. Commercial Uses Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Repair Services, Major Boarding Houses Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Kennel, Commercial Mini -warehouse Pawn Shop Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service 3. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 4. Miscellaneous Uses Parking Facility Broadcasting Towers (B) Unless prohibited in 30-58-4(A) a special use permit shall be required for all uses listed as a special use in the underlying zoning district. In addition, the following uses shall require a special use permit within the Clearbrook village overlay district. An asterisk (*) indicates about:blank 2/4 4/21/23, 5:35 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances additional, modified, or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Multi -Family Dwelling* Two -Family Dwelling* 2. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services* Automobile Repair Services Minor* Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Communication Services Construction Sales and Services* Convenience Store * Fuel Center* Gasoline Station Garden Center* Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Retail Sales* Veterinary Hospital/Clinic (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-58-5. - Site Development Regulations. The site development regulations required in the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be governed by the underlying zoning district in which the property is located as shown on the official zoning maps, except as otherwise modified below: (A) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 35 feet b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. about:blank 3/4 4/21/23, 5:35 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances (B) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 70 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00) Sec. 30-58-6. - Special Regulations in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. The following special regulations shall apply within the Clearbrook village overlay district: (A) Landscaping. Required landscaping within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with the standards contained in section 30-92-5.1 of this ordinance. (B) Signage. Signage within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with C-1 sign district regulations, except as modified by section 30-93-14(F) of this ordinance. (C) Lighting. Lighting within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with the provisions of section 30-94 of this ordinance. (D) Utilities. All new utility lines and services within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be located underground. (E) Residential use types. Residential use types within the Clearbrook village overlay district upon the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall not be deemed to be nonconformities, and may be reconstructed, altered and/or enlarged consistent with the requirements contained in section 30-58-5 of this ordinance. In addition, single family detached dwellings may be developed in the district on lots of record in existence on the effective date of this ordinance. Any dwelling constructed shall not be deemed to be a nonconformity. No new subdivisions for residential purposes shall be allowed within the Clearbrook village overlay district, except that family exemption subdivisions shall be permitted pursuant to section 30-100-11 of this ordinance. (F) Parking. All off-street parking, stacking and loading areas within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with the provisions of 30-91 of this ordinance. (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 1, 12-19-00; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) about:blank 4/4 4/21/23, 5:36 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Sec. 30-92-5.1. - Landscaping Provisions in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. (A) Applicability. 1. The following landscaping provisions shall apply to all property within the Clearbrook village overlay district. 2. These standards shall be deemed to supplement, and be in addition to, standards found in section 30-92 of this ordinance. (B) General standards/specifications. 1. All landscape plans required for uses within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect, or certified nurseryman. 2. All landscaping shall be alive and in good condition at the time of planting. All landscaping shall be maintained, and replaced, as necessary to insure continued compliance with these provisions. 3. Where specified, all deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of two and one-half (2.5) inches at the time of planting. Evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of eight (8) feet at time of planting. 4. Where specified, all shrubs shall have a minimum height of twenty-four (24) inches at time of planting. 5. Native species shall be used for a minimum of fifty (50) percent of required plantings. A listing of acceptable native species is available in the department of planning. (C) Site landscaping. 1. Landscaped areas shall be provided for the side and rear walls of all buildings. The width of these landscaped areas shall be sufficient to accommodate the required plantings. The following plantings shall be required: a. For buildings walls in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height, one (1) tree shall be planted for every twenty (20) lineal feet of building wall. b. For building walls 15 feet or less in height, one tree shall be planted for every 30 lineal feet of building wall. Flexibility in the location of landscaped areas and the placement of the required trees shall be allowed for the purpose of implementing professionally designed landscape plans and for loading, service, or other similar areas. 2. Landscaping shall be provided along the main entrance facade of all buildings, providing a vegetative area between the building and parking areas. The size of the required front landscaped area shall not be less than twenty (20) percent of the square footage of the front about:blank 1/3 4/21/23, 5:36 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances facade of the building. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Undeveloped areas between a building and a public or private right-of-way shall be landscaped with berms, trees, shrubs and groundcover. Landscaping plans for these areas shall incorporate a minimum of one large tree, three small trees and seven shrubs for every thirty (30) feet of lot frontage. 3. All above ground stormwater management areas and facilities shall be landscaped with plant materials that are adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water. The facility shall be landscaped in order to create a seventy-five (75) percent screening of the facility. A minimum of one-third (%) of all provided plantings shall be evergreen. 4. Landscaping shall be provided around the base of any freestanding sign proposed. The size of the landscaped area shall not be less than one and one-half (1.5) times the square footage of the sign. (D) Landscaping of parking areas. 1. Where a new, expanded, or reconfigured parking area is proposed adjacent to a public or private street right-of-way, a planting strip shall be established between the parking area and the adjacent right-of-way. The planting strip shall have a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet. An earthen berm, with an average height of two (2) feet shall be constructed within the planting strip. Within this strip, one (1) large tree, (small if overhead utility lines are present) and nineteen (19) shrubs shall be planted for every thirty (30) feet of frontage. In addition, small trees or groundcovers shall be interspersed within the planting area. One-third (%) of all plantings shall be evergreen materials. No uses shall be permitted within the planting strip except underground utility crossings, pedestrian/bike trails, stormwater management facilities which are an integral part of a landscaping plan, and signs as allowed in the district. 2. All parking areas shall incorporate raised interior landscaped areas for the purpose of visually enhancing parking areas. These areas shall be evenly distributed within the parking area and shall be provided in accordance with the following standards: a. One continuous landscaped median, with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, shall be installed between every four or less rows of parking, or, b. One landscaped peninsula or island with a minimum width of ten (10) feet shall be located between every ten (10) to fifteen (15) parking spaces. One large tree shall be planted for every thirty (30) feet of continuous median, and shall be planted within every landscaped peninsula or island provided. However, at a minimum, one large tree shall be planted within the parking area for each ten (10) parking spaces provided. about:blank 2/3 4/21/23, 5:36 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances In addition, all parking lot landscaped areas shall include deciduous or evergreen shrubs. (Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) about:blank 3/3 4/21/23, 5:37 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances Shopping Centers. Within shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) square feet of gross floor area, businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of one hundred (100) square feet of attached signage. Square footage that existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, new or existing businesses may modify or replace their existing attached signs provided the area of the modified or new signage is equal to or less than the original displayed signage. Modifications to freestanding signs shall be in accord with the district regulations. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of section 30-93-13(E)2., within enclosed shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) gross floor area, businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of one hundred (100) square feet of signage, provided the business has a minimum gross floor area of thirty-two thousand (32,000) square feet, and the sign displayed shall be located a minimum of three hundred (300) feet from the closest public right-of-way. (C) Planned Developments. A signage plan shall be submitted as part of any proposal for a planned residential development (PRD), planned commercial development (PCD), or planned technology development (PTD) as authorized elsewhere in this ordinance. The signage plan shall be part of the required preliminary development plan. All signage plans shall be of sufficient detail to allow the commission and board to judge the compatibility of the proposed signage with the character of the proposed PRD, PCD or PTD. At a minimum, all signage plans shall provide information on the general size, location, style, color, and materials of all signs proposed. In evaluating the PRD, PCD or PTD proposal, the commission and board shall consider the appropriateness of the proposed signage plan in relation to the character of the proposed development, and the surrounding area. (D) Airport Overlay District. The allowable height of signs within any established airport overlay district shall be governed by the height restriction for that district, or the height restriction imposed by the applicable district regulation, whichever is more restrictive. (E) Lots without Public Street Frontage. Lots without public street frontage that existed upon the effective date of this ordinance shall be allowed signage based upon the applicable district regulations as provided for in section 30-93-13 of this ordinance. Permitted signage shall be calculated based upon the frontage width of the lot that parallels the nearest public street. Clearbrook vil/age overlay district. Signage within the Clearbrook village overlay district should be planned, designed and installed to complement a buildings architectural style. All signage within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with C-1 office district regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Lots within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one (1) square foot of sign area per one (1) lineal foot of lot frontage. (F) about:blank 3/4 4/21/23, 5:37 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 2. Signage placed on a building wall shall occupy less than five (5) percent of the facade of that wall. 3. All freestanding signs shall be of a monument design and shall meet the following criteria: a. Monument signs, including their structure, shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height, or ten (10) feet in width. b. Signs shall be channel lit, ground lit, or top lit with a shielded light source so as not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. 4. No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs. 5. A maximum of two (2) directional signs shall be allowed per lot, and no directional sign shall exceed two (2) square feet in size. 6. The following signs shall be prohibited in the Clearbrook village overlay district: a. Off -premises signs. b. Temporary signs. c. Portable signs. d. Roof signs. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 25, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 72595-9, § 1, 7-25-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1 d., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 072721-8 , § 1, 7-27-21) about:blank 4/4 4/21/23, 5:43 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances SEC. 30-94. - EXTERIOR LIGHTING. (A) The following exterior lighting standards shall apply to all uses and developments requiring a site development plan pursuant toSection 30-90of this ordinance. 1. All exterior lighting fixtures shall be designed, located and arranged so as not to direct glare on adjoining streets or residential properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. 2. Within the Clearbrook village overlay district, no freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than eighteen (18) feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, within the district shall be down -lit or shielded so as not to direct glare onto adjoining streets or residential properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. (B) All exterior lighting fixtures within residential zoning districts shall be designed, located and arranged so as not to direct glare on adjoining streets or residential properties. The lighting intensity at adjoining residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. (Ord. No. 121900-11, § 7, 12-19-00) about:blank 1/1 Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District 12/5/00 - CLEARBROOl CLEARBROOK VILLAGE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPIVIENT Purpose and Intent - Background, Character, and Concept for Future Development - Planning Objectives & Conceptual Graphics Design Guidelines — Specifics Existing Conditions Site Layout Architectural Treatment Landscaping Lighting Signage Utilities Overall Design Intent Appendix A: Clearbrook Village Overlay District Maps Appendix B: Approval Process Appendix C: Architectural Examples Appendix D: Native Plants for Landscaping Purpose and Intent This document is prepared as an amendment to the 1998 Community PIan and is created in recognition that the a that result in growth pressures, such as good road access, public water, public sewer, topography suitable for dev underdeveloped areas. It is intended for use by property owners in the development and/or redevelopment of the. Clearbrook Village Area. In addition, this document shall be used by the Planning Commission and Board of Su review of rezonings or special use requests that lie within the Primary or Secondary Areas of the Clearbroolc Vill Maps of the entire Clearbrook Village Area and its Primary and Secondary area designations along with further e designations can be found in Appendix A. The nnain goals of this document are listed below. • To protect and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public, • To enhance the visual appearance of the corridor, • To protect and promote the character, vistas, and economic values along the corridor, and • To prevent unnecessary clutter and congestion associated with unplanned commercial development. Background, Character, and Concept for Future Development Background Historically the Clearbrook area has functioned as a rural residential community with some basic retail services. in this area are made up of4"` and 5' generations and others who enjoy and take pride in the community's rural at character. The recent extension of public water/sewer to the area combined with good road access, high traffic vc undeveloped gentle sloping topography have naturally resulted in growth and development pressures. Recognizing the availability of desirable commercial land in the Clearbrook area, the County designated approxir surrounding Route 220 as Core in the 1998 Community Plan. Core areas are predominately land use areas where development is encouraged. However, in conjunction with the areas core designation, the Community Plan also s areas rural character and provides further guidance as to the type and character of development appropriate. Character The Clearbrook area has unique features that distinguish it from the surrounding area and help to identify its indi rural landscape and views of the ridges and valley are important to the residents of the commmunity. In addition, Parkway and the views associated with it are irreplaceable resources. The preservation of these community resoi maintained into the future. Mountains surround the area and serve to isolate it from surrounding commercial areas, forming a relatively sma the Clearbook area suitable for commercial development. In addition, the Blue Ridge Parkway spans the norther Clearbrook area and as it crosses Route 220 creates a barrier to the commercial strip development forming along The area suitable and designated for core commercial development in the Clearbrook Planning District stretches miles along Route 220 from the boundary of the Blue Ridge Parkway south to Suncrest Drive. Land uses within the Core Clearbrook area are comprised of predominantly vacant and commercial parcels with residential homes. Commercial uses consist of small, mostly uncoordinated, local -serving retail and other conur3 Residences surround the Core area and are comprised of mainly single-family detached homes. The 220 corridor serves a dual purpose as a multi -functional, north -south oriented transportation route. It carries commuter traffic between Franklin County and the Roanoke area. It also functions as the main street of the Clea the commercial and residential uses located on or adjacent to it. Concept for Future Development In the interest of maintaining the rural character of the Clearbrook community, all development within its bounds reflect the sensitive environmental and natural features of the community. The designated core area is envisionec center for the surrounding communities, as well as serving as a focal point in the Clearbrook area. All developmE around the "Village of Clearbrook" area within the community. With in this village area, design guidelines relating to such issues as site plans, architecture, landscaping, signage to ensure development that is compatible with the inherent rural character of the Clearbook area. Together, the fc and guidelines support the creation of a unifying and consistent identity for the Clearbrook area. Planning Objectives for the Clearbrook Village Area Land Use • Implement the Community Plan Future Land Use Map and Policies that advocate creating the "Village of • Plan for quality development, which may include office, retail, nixed -use and institutional uses. • Encourage aesthetic and design excellence in all public and private improvements and developments. De. regarding aesthetic and design excellence is found in the design guidelines located at the end of this plan. revitalization and redevelopment of the Clearbrook area to create attractive, commercially viable, and fun business centers and community focal points. • Encourage designs that produce a desirable relationship between individual sites, the circulation system, a • Encourage consolidation of contiguous parcels to provide for projects that function in a well -designed, eft discouraging traditional strip commercial/industrial development patterns, which have multiple access poi areas, and numerous architecturally unrelated buildings. • Discourage freestanding uses with drive -through facilities and uses that create high traffic volumes to and corridor and that contribute to the strip -commercial character of the highway. • Mitigate the flooding associated with Narrows Branch & associated tributaries that feed into Back Creek, implementation of sub -regional storm water management facilities. • Implement the use of storm water best management practices (BMP's) and techniques to help preserve or quality. Transportation ▪ Provide improved traffic control and safety along Route 220 through the use of stoplights, designated croE roads. • Maintain the long-term function of arterial and collector roadways by limiting accesses and promoting vel between parcels. Urban Design • Promote development that respects the rural character/historical context of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Clear other social and cultural resources in the Clearbrook area. Avoid the negative impacts of uncontrolled sig points, and lack of landscaping. ® Establish Visual Continuity —Provide a uniform right-of-way and a consistent or compatible highway edg unified, attractive visual appearance along the corridor. Place utilities underground in conjunction with a development projects. Place emphasis on signage and landscaping standards. O Establish a Clear Corridor image — Through the use of design guidelines, ensure quality development corn character and establish a strong overall village concept and image for the corridor. e Reduce Impact on Adjacent Residential Communities — Mitigate adverse impacts of commercial activity s and incompatible building forms on adjacent residential uses by effective screening, buffering and designi appropriate scale and height. Conceptual Graphics The graphics on the following three pages are meant to represent the conceptual ideas and specific standards in iiei document. They demonstrate the land use, transportation, and urban design planning objectives in this section an( guidelines located in the subsequent section. The Village Concept Small development nodes separated and defined by features, such as, existing vegetation and natur characterize the Clearbrook Village. Three main signalized intersections along with limited individua Rt. 220 corridor ensure the safety and continual functionality of the vehicular corridor. I./villein Enlry - Sfa nr.anl Y aG eumzilrq l fluid nandatn Cams" It 1 T{ ' al Rnln.rerryal Fnmpnraln nabs[ slresen rand. I. traa9 In ward 4ayabnrneN. PElenaal potter Won mnl:br, 19i. Nslnlar• lrta muss as ' bocternn nb an, Lf Ci.ar1noa ENmen{sy Schell and Pert Pleas., Scp." as a Ixal lanOrraet Emte1laha4 Col real- 13ntiy redays1'latnl tmt la consedrde COCAS) pntnia NtlpaFlrq {aufY,om Conceptual Village Diagram M,Srlan?MO mast AI Ga p b htfdnrsla IS![ tartlet 40001 1,'0p1 hcrt a*idalaq rpm Want.' yvam Proien natural alraem GrMaar Nasnlsra1pa' 0 *0*n 0egelahve nntrr. aPe CenIer Slpnfranr wawa o{ SU.'1WIEmg rrwsrl na • Rural Ravlda00IV SVPrep�ansl alma water ma:fgornem Isenly &ourhmn Entry Caar reln C Cc Naze - 1 slay that traa01 b CaamrtsI/ Cammpr: Site Plan Standards Six toot planting ir strip required.._JJ No building planting required. *qv. t.mt51-€4Mfr.." for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District Slo1141 waler management area t'f interior land 'taping required in amount equal la 7% of the total parking area. Access along primary road Typical development under current County regulations LtILI3IB Utilize building articulation 10 Pia€ break up tong expanses of with buildings. MAC 10-1 aIF kl Atse•it."*46-$0*-4Ete Utilize secondary_ roads for access. 11 Incorporate tree ptanlings Break up large parking along steles and rear el wllh landscaped palest buildings. corridors. Development appl recommends standa Lighting is out of scale with podeslrian. Signege overpowers the building. Pole signs and overhead utility lines dialer and dominate the landscape. Typical development under current County regulations Architectural Standards for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District Trees aid in cooling large - parking areas and add human scale to otherwise vast landscapes. Signage area Is In scale with building iagade. 4 zi Building Architecture. Lighting, and Parking Lot Landscaping Signage and Adjacent Right -of -Way Plantings Utility lines have beer behind buildings or p underground. \i•- (9. ,IL,Arr,T-1;i — ,.... ., i Dew reco Design Guidelines — Specifics This section provides specific requirements intended to achieve the goals and objectives described in previous sec Existing Conditions A. Where significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, and/or signifii natural features shall be reflected in the site layout, to the extent practical. B. hi addition, existing tree masses that currently act as natural buffers of proposed developments shall be preserved. These tree masses function as natural backdrops to proposed buildings. C. Any large native tree in good condition and over 24" in diameter must be protected, preserved and ince site layout, except where such practice severely limits the site's development options. Il. Site Layout — The relationship of the building and other site structures to the corridor street and to other devel corridor shall be as follows: A. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, and pedestrian walks shall guide the layout of the site. B. Multiple buildings in a single development shall be designed and arranged in order to create and define than one building or out parcels are proposed, building placements shall be prearranged and together for the proposed development. Where feasible, orient commercial buildings toward the road with parking to rear. Site buildings to discourage large expanses of parking adjacent to and visible from roadways. Ciu reinforce a neighborhood style or ambience. In addition, site buildings with respect to natural topograpl environmental/historic features. C. Provisions shall be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. Mini access points and provide well -designed and integrated complexes with efficient internal circulation patt D. Pedestrian circulation shall be provided for and coordinated with that generated from adjacent properties E Parking 1. Design parking areas to allow for future interconnections with adjacent parcels. 2. Where more than forty (40) parking spaces are required, break up required parking into smaller ar the site, lessening their visual and environmental impacts. If more than 150 spaces are required, p up by the use of raised landscaped strips with a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet. 3. Any parking in excess of County Requirements shall be constructed with the use of pervious pave gravel shall not be allowed. 4. Site buildings to take advantage of any shared parking opportunities that exist. F. Site Access 1. All uses shall have access designed so as not to impede traffic on a public street intended to carry th such end, access via the following means will be given favorable consideration: a. By the provision of shared entrances, interparcel travel ways, or on -site service drives conne properties. b. By access from a public highway other than along Route 220. c. By the internal streets of a commercial, or office complex. 2. Parcels of land existing at the time the Clearbrook overlay district is created shall not be denied acce highway if no reasonable joint or cooperative access is possible, at the time of development. lIl_ Architectural Treatment A. Architectural treatment of buildings, including materials, color and style, shall be compatible with the selec within the project area. See Appendix C. Compatibility shall be achieved through the use of similar buildi materials, scale, colors and/or other architectural features. B. There shall be no visible flat or shed roofs permitted. Utilize dormers, gables and other variations in roof s that are compatible with the basic facade elements and add interest and scale to the building. Gable roofs, multiple plain roofs are encouraged. C. The maximum height of structures shall not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet or three stories, which( D. Where large buildings are proposed, landscaping and architectural facades shall be used to lessen their iml 1. Avoid vast blank building walls in areas visible from the street or adjacent properties by using fenestn articulation, detailing or landscape plantings. 2. Building frontages shall have offsets, projections, or other distinctive changes in the building facade. E. Select materials for harmony with the chosen buildings located within the project area. Exterior materials standard concrete block, metal, or brightly colored siding will not be allowed. Materials shall be in the rai IV. Landscaping A. Landscape standards and specifications 1. Trees required by the preceding paragraphs shall measure a minimum of 2 % inches in caliper at plat 2. Shrubs required by the preceding paragraphs shall measure a minimum of 24 inches in height at tune 3. The use of native species shall make up a minimum of 50% of the planting materials. See Schedule recommended native species. B. Street frontages shall be devoted to building architecture, landscaping, or public green spaces. Landscapi of properties adjoining any road right-of-way shall include the following: A planting area with a minimum width of 15 feet shall be established outside of any road right -of w easements. This area shall be developed as an open green space. Within this strip, one large shade tree and seven shrubs shall be planted for every 30 feet of frontage planting shall be made up of evergreen materials. Small trees shall be used where overhead utility 1: planting of large trees. 3. In addition, flowering ornamental trees, earth berms and/or ground covers shall be interspersed arno trees. 4. Where parking is located in front of the building, a berm of varying height with an average height o located between the parking area and the adjacent r-o-w. In addition to any other requirements, the with a minimum of two shrubs for every 5 feet. 5. No uses shall be permitted within the planting strip except: permitted entrances, minimal utility cro: pedestrian/bike trails, storrn water management facilities (which are an integral part of a landscape 1 allowed in this district. C. Parking Areas 1. Parking areas shall incorporate raised landscaped islands in order to break up large expanses of pave] landscaped island can be in the form of continuous landscaped strips between every four rows of par] islands located throughout the lot, and/or planting islands between every 10 to 15 spaces. Any raise shall be a minimum of ten feet in width. Islands shall be planted with large shade trees and evergree groundcovers other than grass. 2. Large shade trees shall be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every t spaces and shall be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. D. Building Plantings 1. Trees shall be planted along the side and rear exterior walls of buildings to soften their appearance. planted for every 30 feet of building wall. Flexibility in placement shall be granted where service are are necessary adjacent to the building. 2. Buildings shall incorporate foundation plantings and/or landscaped plazas in an area equal to 20% of area, along main entrance facades, creating a vegetative buffer between the parking area and the built E. Stoiuiwater Management 1. Above ground stormwater management areas and facilities shall be Iandscaped with plants adaptab inundated with water. The facility shall be landscaped in order to create a 75% screening of the fac plantings shall be evergreen. V: Lighting A. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 18 feet above grade. All exterior ligh lighting, shall be down -lit or shielded so as not to direct glare onto adjoining streets or residential pro] adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. B. In addition, the light source from any security lighting shall not be visible from adjoining residential p VI. Signage A. The shared use of signs is encouraged for adjacent businesses. B. Signage shall complement the buildings' architectural style. Materials such as exposed standard cone brightly colored siding will no be allowed. Colors shall be in the range of earth tones. C. Lots shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one (1) square foot of sign area pei lot frontage. D. Signage placed on buildings shall occupy less than 5% of the facade area. E. All freestanding signs shall be monument type (no pole signs) and meet the following criteria: 1. Monument signs shall not exceed 7 feet in height or 10 feet in width; 2. Signs shall be channel lit, ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast ligh traffic or on any adjacent road or property. Signs shall be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. The size of the landscaping plo half times the square footage of the sign. U. No more than three (3) business signs are permitted for each business. H. Entrance and exit signs are limited to two (2) square feet each. No advertising allowed. Restricted signs. The following types of signs shall be prohibited within the district: 1. Off premises signs 2. Portable signs 3. Temporary signs 4. Changeable copy signs 5. Roof signs 6. Pole signs Vu. Utilities F. All new site utilities shall be located underground. G. Where feasible, relocate existing overhead utility lines along Rt. 220 underground or to rear yards of b corridor. Overall Design Intent The previous specific design guidelines were developed to achieve the following overall design intentions. Existing conditions, site layout and site access Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of an c development pattern for the Clearbrook Village area. This may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preser rolling ten-ain typical of the area; planting species of trees along streets and pedestrian ways that reflect the native area; insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape extent practical, existing significant stream corridors which may be located on the site and integrating these feature the surrounding development; and limiting the building mass/height and required parking to a scale that does not setting of the site, or the surrounding area. Architectural Treatment New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of historically significa examples in the Clearbrook area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, which provide important examples along with other existing suitable examples are contained in Appendix C. The examples contained in Appendix C should be used as a guide of building design: the standard of compatibility historic and existing structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new developments. Replicatioi important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of cornpatibility can b building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as tradi Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. Landscaping Landscaping should promote visual order within the corridor and help to integrate buildings into the existing envii corridor. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street. The landscaping of parking areas and entrance pedestrian oriented village concept and feel. Signage, Lighting and Utilities Low signage and lighting fixtures will provide for a uniform and attractive corridor where the viral views and vist by pole signs and light poles. Placing all new and relocated utility lines underground will help reduce the potentia the road corridors and within the village area. Landscaping, building architecture, attractive signage and distant nl characterize the Clearbroolc Village area. Appendix A: Clearbrook Village Overlay District Maps The Clearbrook Village Area is divided into two main area designations. The first is the Primary Area. It is depic on the following maps and represents the area that has been rezoned to C-2 General Commercial District. In addit Village Overlay District (CVOD), adopted as part of the County Zoning Ordinance, has been applied to this area. additional standards and regulations over and above the C-2 General Commercial District regulations. The Secondary Areas are depicted by the salmon color on the following neaps. These areas inay or may not be sui! development and no rezoning is proposed at this time. However, if rezonings are proposed in the future on proper this area they should be evaluated based upon their Conununity Plan designation and their conformance with the p guidelines contained within this document. The Secondary Area designation is used primarily as a safety valve to when those properties are rezoned they are evaluated under the same guidelines as the adjoining properties within 4,40 i 1 BUCK MOU LEGEND PRIMARY AREA SECONDARY AREA PERPARED BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLEARBRC VERLA` ( ORTHEF SCALE: 1 INCH = 1 000 FEET PERPARED BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLEARBRC RVERLA' oL'-' 'EI LE PRIM SEC( SCALE: 1 INCH = 1 000 FEEL Appendix B: Approval Process During the review or proposed projects for either rezonings or special use permits a variety of submissions are recc approval. Preliminnry Conference The Preliminary Conference should be the first step in the rezoning or site plan approval process. This review is e any rezoning or site plan submittal. The planning staff requests a minimum of information and investment for this Submittal recommendations for the preluninaiy conference: a) Sketch or photograph of proposed building, b) Roanoke County Tax Map Number, and c) Any other material, which the applicant believes, will make the preliminary conference more productive. Development Proposal Review During the staff, Planning Commission, and/or Board of Supervisors review, a variety of submittals are recornmenc conformance with the Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District. Submittal recommendations for project review: a) Preliminary site plan showing proposed building and parking lot layouts. Also include any existing natural fer incorporated into the site plan, such as existing vegetation, stream corridors, etc...; b) Elevations of all facades visible from the adjoining road right-of-ways; c) Description of how the proposal complies with the Design Guidelines; d) Justification for any requested deviation from the Design Guidelines. :bitectural Examples .gical Center of Southwest VA Clearbrook Internal Medicine 4 `it rook Elementary School Proposed Land Rover Dealership 21 Appendix D: Native Plants for Landscaping Shrubs Alrurs serrulata Aronia rnelanocarpa Castanea ptunila Ceanothus arnericanus Cephalanthus occidentalis Cornus amomunt Gaultheria pr ocurnbens Gaylussacia baccata Hamarnelis virginiana Ilex ver ticillata Kalrnia latiflia Pieris floribunda Rhododendron caiendulaceuni Rhododendron maximunz Rhododendron prinophyllum Rosa carolina Rubus alleghenzensis Yaccinzum angustifolium Vaccinium corymbosurn Viburnum prunifoliunt Small Trees Anrelanchier arborea Anrelanchier canadensis Anrelanchier laevis Asimina triloba Cercis canadensis Chionanthus virginicus Cornus alternifolia Corpus florida Crataegus crus-galli Ettonymous atropurpureus Halesia tetraptera Mores rubra Common Alder Black Chokeberry Allegheny Chinkapin New Jersey Tea Buttonbush Silky Dogwood Wintergreen Black Huckleberry Witch Hazel Winterberry Mountain Laurel Mountain Pieris Flame Azalea Great Rhododendron Rose Azalea Pasture Rose Allegheny Blackberry Lowbush Blueberry Highbush Blueberry Black -Haw Viburnum Downy Serviceberry Canada Serviceberry Smooth Serviceberry Paw Paw Redbud Fnngetree Alternate -leaf Dogwood Flowering Dogwood Cockspur Hawthorn Wahoo Common Silverbell Red Mulberry Ostrya virginiana Pr�tntts virginiana Rhus glabra Arts hirta Medium to Large Trees Acer rubrunz Acer saccharunl Aesculus (lava Betula alleghaneinsis Betula lenta Carya alba Carys ovata Diospyros virginiana Fagus grandifolia Fraxinus americana Fraxinus pensylvanica Juglans ntgra Juniperus virginiana Luquidanzbar styracfua Liriodendron fulipifera Nyssa sylvatica Oxydendrum arboreunt Pinus strobes Prunus serotina Quercus alba _Quercus coccinea Quercus falcata Quercus iliczfolia QItereus Montana Quercus r ubra _Quercus velutina Thuja occidentalis Tilia americana Chapter 6: Future Land Use Guide Transition: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Land Use Types: Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park -like surroundings are encouraged. A high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design is encouraged. Retail - Small-scale planned and clustered retail uses. Multifamily Residential - Garden apartments at a density of 12 to 24 units per acre. Single -Family Attached Residential - Planned townhouse communities of 6 or more units per acre. Parks - Public and private recreational facilities. These facilities should be linked to residential areas by greenways, bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited commercial uses exist. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. SURROUNDING LAND USE - Locations which serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use patterns. ORIENTATION - Locations which are physically oriented toward the major street. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities Land Use Types: Chapter 6: Future Land Use Guide General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. Principal Industrial: A future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: Agricultural - Industries which involve the manufacturing, storage, marketing and wholesaling of agricultural products. These industries may also be located outside of the Principal Industrial areas, within the rural designations, where agricultural skills may be found. Small Industries and Custom Manufacturing - These industries typically serve a local market and may involve the on -site production of goods by hand manufacturing. Mining and Extraction - These facilities locate according to the availability of natural resources. Industrial - Conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers, storage yards. From: Megan Cronise To: Planning, Planning CC: Thompson, Philip; James, Rebecca; Henry, Isaac Date: 4/5/2023 5:30 PM Subject: Fwd: Comment Review Request - Boing US Holdco Inc. Attachments: Ped Vision Plan Excerpt.pdf Good afternoon, Transportation comments on this application are as follows: The subject property is included in the Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan. The Plan indicates that the property is located within the Clearbrook Multimodal District and both Buck Mountain Road and Route 220 are identified as Multimodal Through Corridors with sidewalk indicated along Route 220. Please see the Excerpt attached for more info. The Clearbrook Village Design Guidelines also indicate that "Pedestrian circulation shall be provided for and coordinated with that generated from adjacent properties." (page 10, II.D.) VDOT will be constructing pedestrian signals and crosswalks in 2024 as part of intersection improvements at Buck Mountain Road and Route 220. Please include sidewalk along the Buck Mountain Road and Route 220 frontage of this property and connect the sidewalk to VDOT's pedestrian crosswalk ramp. Please contact me with questions. Thank you, Megan Megan G. Cronise, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Roanoke County Department of Planning (540) 772-2106 mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov >>> Cecelia Thomas 3/16/2023 4:10 PM >>> Good Afternoon, Please find attached an application packet for the petition mentioned above. The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this petition on Tuesday, May 2, 2023. Please review and email your comments to planning@roanokecountyva.gov by Friday, April 7th, 2023. Thank you, Gu 2Li cv Tko-vwwy Planning Administrative Assistant Department of Planning Phone 540-772-2082 Fax 540-776-7155 cthomas@roanokecountyva.gov M Prepared by the REGIONAL REGIONAL PEDESTI Roanoke County Type Legend: 1 = Intersection, 2 = ID LOCATION TYPE DESCRIPTION LOCAL SOURCE PRIORITY 387 Rt 220 South from 419 to Old Rocky Mtn Rd 2 Pedestrian improvements Low Ped/Transit Pub 388 Rt 220 South from Stable to Will Carter 2 Sidewalk Low Roanoke County 390 Rt 221 from Cotton Hill Rd to Chatsworth 2 Pedestrian connection Low Roanoke County 393 Rt 419 Electric Rd and Grandin Road 1 Pedestrian intersection improvements High Roanoke County 395 Rt 419 Electric Rd and 1-81 2 Sidewalk Low Roanoke County 397 Rt 419 Electric Rd and Keagy Rd 1 Pedestrian intersection improvements Medium Roanoke County 398 Rt 419 Electric Rd and Ogden Rd 1 Pedestrian intersection improvements High Roanoke County 399 Rt 419 Electric Rd and South Peak 1 Pedestrian intersection improvements High Roanoke County 401 Rt 419 Electric Rd and Starkey Rd 1 Pedestrian intersection improvements H gh Roanoke County 402 Rt 419 Electric Rd at Tanglewood area 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub 404 Rt 419 Electric Rd from City Limit to Cove Rd 2 Pedestrian improvements Low Ped/Transit Pub 405 Rt 419 Electric Rd from Colonial to 3600 Electric 2 Pedestrian improvements Medium Ped/Transit Pub 409 Rt 419 Electric Rd from Ogden to city limit 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub 410 Rt 419 Electric Rd from Stoneybrook to Woodmar 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub MP Prepared by the Imp REGIONAL REGIONAL PEDESTI .! I • ew pa d al DEstnct, Legend Basting Hard Sisfaom Existing Transit Stars Existing Natural Surface Conceptual Greerwray Man {2007) jJtrr Genders Muhl -octal Districts = 2040 NIPO Study Ares I Ja'adictional &runtimes, Multimodal Corridors ienue MaioAvenue Boulevard, Off-R cast Tr anspertation Carl:let Niuttiroctlei Through Corridor Recommendations Type Inters eatior a Rani Surface Str' cape AC ,t7r .0 • LIP-L ad'? er 0 25 0.375 0 5 6imM 4 .7* 1019,414 • 1141,/ :11 Clear -brook rialbmodal District 1 at Boing US Holdc Special use permit to operate a c approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned Commercial District, and CVOD, Clec Overlay District Board of Supervisors Public K May 23, 2023 (3:00 p.m. 8.!ue i dtie Parkway National Park Location Ma • 3434 Buck Mountain Road & 5147 Franklin Road • 1.97 Acres • Current Use: Retails Sales (Antique Shop) • Special Use Permit for a Car Wash 3 Project Site 4 Photograph 5 Photograph Mlle, MEM ABUT CA1111 7)819-496 Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Photograph, 9 Photograph Photograph 11 Photograph 12 Photograph • The Roanoke County Zoning OrdinancE wash as: "Washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical i automatic conveyor machines and self-sery • Car washes are only permitted in the C approved special use permit • Use and design standards apply 13 Zoning Backgro • The subject parcel is within the Clea Overlay District (CVOD) • CVOD requirements include: • building height limits • lot coverage limits • landscaping provisions • signage regulations • lighting regulation 14 Zoning Backgro • Development in the CVOD is also encou required, to meet the "Design Guideline Overlay District," which relate to: • Existing conditions • Site layout • Parking • Site access • Architectural treatment • Landscaping • Parking arE • Building plc • Stormwate • Lighting • Signage • Utilities 15 Design Guideli 41.464 LICK s03 ER u • Automated Car Wash Building • 4 Parking Spaces • 23 Vacuum Bays • 2 Pay Stations • Access off Buck Mountain Road (Existing entrance) • Sidewalk along Franklin Road N SOW s Anea sn Mil4EBF,rS 5,4 —4- 555. .�05,9 (+5 FS1,44CPZ raaxa%me .PPIWA2 n5 Ali 8�911N G54iFEA aL i�Pi1F 6? 16 Concept Pla MIMMTP gym — uw.nr ACC0.9.0 a.euK 11 a..LE vs aaaaa+ziwe 1g0k1. AE o tea. r —a—,.— u6EnW.oarrir mr2I �r : : — 4�R116rPRiY�C 01.n40r rt 0 J94wtYr4ProvetrE o to:✓'C MVO* M91M1@WZ GLlR1' 911CR !J_ rr.ni 90 tax OM .wua,r. mw,x rvmarcr,,i, RORK.ro�ie�warm rworcvw $OCB3EULEFL P PER FUTURE .07 1111 wEl.BRa rat 0T1167,9j PROP Landscape PI c c c c c c c 1 I ELEVATION 2 I ELEVATION Ql 3 6 ELEVATION 4 1 ELEVATION 18 Building Rende C rearb rook Park 20 Zoning Core • Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. • Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. • Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. • Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. • The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. Future Land U 21 Public Hearing -May 2, 2023 • One citizen spoke during the public I included losing a retail store that hot. vendors, location of car wash could parcels in the area, and that the car visually appealing at this location. • Planning Commission reviewed VDC project. Planning Commission discus • Proposed Project • Surrounding Zoning • Clearbrook Village Overlay District regu • Future Land Use Designation (Core) 22 Planning Commit Planning Commission recommends special use permit for a car wash w 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantil concept site plan and conceptual landscap Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. c subject to any changes required during the c review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substan- architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wa: by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any change building plan review process. 23 Planning Commit Question 24 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO BOING US HOLDCO, INC. TO OPERATE A CAR WASH ON APPROXIMATELY 1.97 ACRES OF LAND ZONED C-2 (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND CVOD (CLEARBROOK VILLAGE OVERLAY DISTRICT), LOCATED AT 3434 BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD AND 5147 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO: 088.03-02-01.00-0000), IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Boing US Holdco, Inc. has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2 (High Intensity Commercial) District and CVOD (Clearbrook Village Overlay District), located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road and 5147 Franklin Road (Tax Map No: 088.03-02-01.00-0000), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 2023, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 23, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition to obtain a special use permit, with two conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed special use meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Page 1 of 2 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The special use permit is hereby approved, with the following conditions: a. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept site plan and conceptual landscaping plan for Take 5 Car Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. dated March 3, 2023, subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. b. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke VA prepared by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 2 of 2 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 SAMPLE MOTIONS Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS The petition of Boing US Holdco, Inc., to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.97 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and CVOD, Clearbrook Village Overlay District, located at 3434 Buck Mountain Road and 5147 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit with the following conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept site plan and conceptual landscaping plan for Take 5 Car Wash prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. dated March 3, 2023, subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2 The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled Take 5 Car Wash Roanoke VA prepared by COR3 Design, LLC, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed special use permit request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan or good zoning practice, and/or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Martie Murphy to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2 (High Intensity Commercial District), and C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with conditions) located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard, Vinton Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance for a special use permit for a car wash in a commercial district. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a car wash as "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self- service car washes." A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2 zoning district. In 2006, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning of a larger parcel that includes a portion of this property to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions for the construction of a retail sales facility. The proffered conditions from this rezoning do not apply to the development of this site for a car wash. DISCUSSION: Page 1 of 2 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this special use permit application on May 2, 2023. No citizens spoke on this application during the public hearing. The Planning Commission summarized two (2) email comments received which expressed opposition to the car wash and the desire for a different type of development such as a restaurant or retail shops. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed project, the future land use designations, and the proffered conditions from the 2006 rezoning. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit to operate a car wash with two (2) conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plans and landscaping plan for Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc. dated February 3, 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landscaping plan), subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled New Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance granting a special use permit to operate a car wash in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, with two (2) conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plans and landscaping plan for Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc. dated February 3, 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landscaping plan), subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled New Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Request: Location: Tax Parcel: Magisterial District: Existing Proffered Conditions (To Remain): Martie Murphy To obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard #050.01-01-05.06-0000 Vinton 1. Before a certificate of occupancy can be issued for any building constructed along the southern border of the property, a row of staggered evergreen trees will be installed along said southern border at or near the top of the slope above the existing storm water detention facility. Trees will be spaced 12' on center and will extend from one end of the building or buildings along that border to the other end. It is estimated that this would result in the planting of no more than 45 trees. 2. Screening shall be provided for HVAC rooftop units on the building or buildings located along the southern border of the property in order to shield those units from the view of residents situated directly behind the Integrity Windows facility. Screening shall be in the form of covers or parapet walls, and shall be a neutral color. Suggested SUP 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept Conditions: plans and landscaping plan for Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc. dated February 3, 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landscaping plan), subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled New Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Martie Murphy is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard, Vinton Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core and Principal Industrial. Core is a Future Land Use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed car wash 1 is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. Principal Industrial is a Future Land Use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed car wash is not consistent with the Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation; however, the proposed subdivided parcel does not include this land use designation and the development would be located only within the area designated Core. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a car wash as "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self-service car washes." A car wash is only permitted in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, with an approved special use permit. The use is also subject to use and design standards listed in Sec. 30-85-10 of Roanoke County Code as follows: (A) General standards: 1. All new car wash facilities, whether conveyor operated or self-service, shall be equipped with a water recycling system for eighty-five (85) percent of the water used. If the special use permit is approved, construction of the car wash would require comprehensive building and site plan reviews. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — The existing site is currently vacant and undeveloped. A portion of the property was previously part of the adjoining vacant parcel to the south. Before property lines were adjusted, this portion of the property was rezoned as part of the vacant parcel (Tax Map# 050.01-01-05.05-0000). In 2006, Kahn Development Company, Inc. petitioned to rezone the parcel from I-1C, Industrial District with conditions, to C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, for the construction of a retail sales facility. This rezoning removed conditions from a previous 1989 rezoning, and proffered two new conditions which addressed tree plantings along the southern border as well as screening of HVAC rooftop units. The aforementioned southern border is not located on the subject site, but on the adjoining parcel. The applicant is not planning development on the portion of this parcel which contains these conditions. Topography/Vegetation — The existing site is vacant and experiences minor slope changes throughout which total approximately twenty foot change in elevation overall. There are established deciduous and evergreen trees along Challenger Avenue, and plantings that delineate the property line between this parcel and CVS to the southeast. The vegetation consists of mostly grass and overgrowth. Surrounding Neighborhood — The subject site is located at the intersection of Challenger Avenue and Valley Gateway Boulevard. Across Valley Gateway Boulevard to the north and northeast is a commercial complex containing Kroger, Kroger Fuel Center, Pinnacle, Valvoline Instant Oil Change, Zips Car Wash, Firestone, Cafe Asia, Sal's Italian, Express Family Care, and other businesses. These properties are zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and C-2S, High Intensity Commercial District with a Special Use Permit. Integrity Windows and Coca-Cola are located to the southeast and are zoned 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial. To the southwest, the parcel adjoins other C-2, High intensity Commercial District, properties including CVS and The Bank of Botetourt. Directly to the south the site adjoins a vacant parcel zoned C-2C, High Intensity 2 Commercial District with Conditions. Community Outreach — Approximately 151 letters went out to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, the proposed concept plan, concept information for staff, and instructions for how to submit comments. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The concept plan shows an automated tunnel car wash building, pay stations, covered (20 spaces) uncovered parking (10 spaces) with accessible vacuums, and two (2) ADA parking spaces. The applicant is showing a proposed subdivision of the existing parcel and the car wash facility would be located on a parcel approximately 1.74 acres in size. The remaining land from the existing parcel would be sold in the future. Access/Traffic Circulation — The subject site is located off of Valley Gateway Boulevard and Challenger Avenue. One access is shown off of Valley Gateway Boulevard. Valley Gateway Boulevard is currently divided with a concrete median, so this access is only right -in, right -out. This parcel is located within the Route 460 Land Use and Connectivity Study, and the proposed site plan shows that this access is available to utilize for the implementation of a new private roadway labeled "Segment I" in the study. Sidewalk is also shown along Valley Gateway Boulevard and along this new private roadway in conformance with the Route 460 Land Use and Connectivity Study. Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety — All construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Roanoke County Transportation - Roanoke County appreciates the new private roadway to facilitate implementation of Segment "I" in the adopted U.S. Route 460 Land Use and Connectivity Study. We also appreciate the inclusion of sidewalk along Valley Gateway and along the new private roadway. What are the plans for the southern portion of the property between the end of the new private roadway and CVS? We would appreciate discussing where Segment "I" could go from the stub -out to help frame future development on that land and to enable a future connection to adjacent parcels. Stormwater Operations - No comments. Fire and Rescue — Fire and Rescue does not object to the project and it will not increase services. Fire flow and access requirements will be addressed during the site plan review process. General Services — General Services does not see any issues and has no comments. VDOT — 1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of-way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes, but is not limited to, commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum 3 required distances can be met. 3. Trip generation calculations will be required for this development with the first plan submittal, as well as right turn lane warrant calculations. 4. The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core and Principal Industrial. Core is a Future Land Use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally - based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax- exempt facilities. The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. Principal Industrial is a Future Land Use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed car wash is not consistent with the Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation; however, the proposed subdivided parcel does not include this land use designation and the development would be located only within the area designated Core. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Martie Murphy is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, and C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard, Vinton Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designations of this area as Core and Principal Industrial. The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation, but is not consistent with the Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation. If the parcel is subdivided as indicated, the new development would only contain land designated Core. Staff suggests two conditions for the special use permit which addresses conformance with the submitted site plans, landscaping plan and architectural renderings. CASE NUMBER: #8-512023 PREPARED BY: Alyssa Dunbar HEARING DATES: PC: May 2, 2023 BOS: May 23, 2023 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs C-2 District Regulations Ordinance #072506-8 Core Future Land Use Designation Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation 4 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date v I '3 Re �e7• cutteue S Applicati fee: iS'•So PC/BZA M e: �� i ci- Placardsissued: BOS date: a3 GZe Case Number 5 - S 1Z3 a3 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review ❑ Rezoning FA Special Use ❑ Variance n Waiver Applicants name/address w/zip Martie Murphy 124 East Thompson Street Thomaston, GA 30286 Phone: 701;-6 7-na14 Cell #: 708-975-6882 Email: martieRshiconstructuiongroup.com Contact for Legal Ads t-k l tk l t WArpCt� Owner's name/address w/zip LIDL US Operations, LLC 3500 S. Clark Street Arlington, Virginia 22202 Phone #: 844-747-5435 CeI1 #: 844-747-5435 Email: legal@IidLus Property Location At the intersection of Valley Gateway Blvd. and Challenger Avenue US Route 460 Magisterial District: Vinton Community Planning area: Bonsack/Vinton Tax Map No.: PID #50.01-01-05.06 Existing Zoning: C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District Size of parcel(s): Acres: 5.995 Acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Lot REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15 2 2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: Remain C-2C Proposed Land Use: Carwash Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? FIRST (Rezoning). Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? request? Yes Cl No ❑ Yes m No FI Yes I4 No C IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this ta VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Or C cc in order to: 3 Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to co tj \ • 11. Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinanc c° r �sL 4y{ i �p� 'E'�' ,, . Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to s Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPT ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. e/S /CP V/AA Consultation Application ustification R/S/WLCP V/AA I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the consent f the owner. 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application 11/S/W/CP V/AA limil Application fee Proffers, if applicable r/ Adjoining property owners property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and ,_''2t`1-- - -i y.--, Owner's Signature Contract Purchaser 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant TWAS Properties LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed development is for an automated tunnel car wash, the purpose of the C-2 zoning is providing a variety of commercial and service related actives. We feel that a car wash would fall into this category in providing a commercial service to the urban area. The zoning allows for car wash but only with a special use permit approval. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Per the Community Plan the portion of the lot that is being proposed for development is classified as "core" in which the proposed car wash would be in conformance with. Note the rear of the parcel is classified as Principal Industrial designation, the parcel would be subdivided so that the rear of the property could be developed along with the guidelines of Principal industrial. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The current parcel is a vacant lot, the proposed development will have a high end car wash with stone exterior and landscaping to develop the parcel. Access to the parcel will come off of Valley Gateway Blvd, therefore we see no negative impact to the public. Utility services are available In the area, and would be designed to meet the local requirements. 3 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS m a Applicant name and name of development b Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions ® d Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc, f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties ID g. All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces I✓1 Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. 3/2/23 Date Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this fist is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Comrnissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Martie Murphy Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature 3/10/2023 Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 r7.10E SECIII. 1 PER ROL,F INECTNITI 5T.4.0V POTEHEAL ,,ANVORIA IMPRCVENI.T9 CONE EY TNE 111.1.011,9,q7.1..1. Rtt, 5.995°4°cl-07,6106 ZONE.6 A?6,51 C2 1-0 SITE INFORMATION: APORESS AARON DISTRICT ROANONE PROPER,' AREA..6,65 ACRES pitorurrr zoNNc .11.1.51rT sum.. SEIDANS f JO SICE PARKING NOTE- PARNA. RECOPIED 1 SPACES PER 1003 6FA 0.1, SO /1E00 = 9..01 SETS LAYOUT AND STAKING NOT I IF 11. RAMS ARE XOT CLEAR OR 1:11 EMINEERINO VERVICFS, IMC AT 71,10-5. ALI KADIN° WO FASTING ME -TOW I CONTRACTOR S.1.1. CAREFULLY IMNIAI -FIRST 1.101.010WIECGE .81-ING C t SITE SMALL 1. DRESSED TO A A1114.1.1 TOPSOIL LAYER OF FOUR PIC ALL STRIFINO SW1S .1XLI.CONFOI TRARSPORTAT1ON ARO 15...P.AL. P.1.19,1S STALL SIRIPVING TO SE TELL° ALE HANCICAR SPACF3MO. .6.111, ACT CESIGMGOLIEIJMES 7 C11.11510115 MU CURVE RAINI ME GIVE OTREFMASF DIMENSIOUS ARE GIVEN TO ARCI-FECEIRAL FIANSASTC HATCH LEGEND: STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEM STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMEt 3- I-N314 ROLL CURE EXISTING ASPHALT RW&AP[ 0:4 /7 1,ay 'L ---- '! 2023 Microwlt Corporation4n 2022 Maxar CNES (2022) Dlstrtbutior Airbus OS SITE INFORMATION', R0ANONE COUNTY. MGM PROPERTY AR. .915 ACRES SIDE REAR IV PARKING NOTE: PARKING REWIRED SFs, •°..ACEI5) SITE LAYOUT AND STAKING NOt I, THE PLANS ARE NOT EAR OR MSC, ENSIXI£RIH3 SERVICES. NC AT R... 0.1TRACTOR SHALL CAREFIALY EXAM 4 13,TIIRE SITE SHALL BE DRESSED TO UN A NMI. TORSO. LAY. OP FOUR IN STRIAN..0 SIGNS MALL CONK ALL HAMINCRI. P AMONG SPACE NAM WITH TWE ARCHTECTLIPAL FUNS AST. HATCH LEGEND; STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAYER STANDARD DUTY ASPRALTPAYEMEI Y HIGH ROLL CUR EXISTING ASPHAL• fpF -011' dirt' oro.. wow 1P WM eV 1%.3r..„71...e. NOTES 9. Mal= now .1 OPPoi. wo Poor SHFILIE I:LAMING Om-PE, 1Per avo nog no. PLA4ado oats. 41:67 V.Ltt TREE PLANTING 111111.1e PIC t5azi-o.t.os,t5e s'ensAcREs 'ZONED C2 3133303VERREA311333. 333.3 339. 03, ARO Cae9133.133.1313earaaLle 71,4 • gm. 45-?' 31.3 ILL • 7-11-1M." 72- eremplepuaue 3,13P13113,19333.1.319P3193,3013 .310k1oustpot o our KIIVAXIIIMMPAPP,P119 04.141.111 AELLNONPOPLORPURIPPOOOMPOY wcoanno.-InuanwrIr 11.12.1.11PAY1111/114. orralatovyni raw 1011P-91.1114.111 WW1. OIL03110. /161P4POPICLO IdOPOPLIGNIP1,01. 114,..11,41,00PRIPPA .34,APItto .3,933A .93333303.1.....3.3* LI.O.0.311102..13P-LSOLLP 1.110.91:011RONO.I.PPLAs OPOOLF0P.01,1.1. CLOP. 1.12,90 p.pOOPOOT SITE iNFORMATICet F3331.331,133E3.31.33 ACRES P130131RT./ Sagas .3 LANDSCAPE NOTE.. PLLGOOIRPEOPRE081,0,001/ERED EV EMIICIUREIPP.O0O1P092309P101.21.1.LPH SONE/ OMPORPOWHERMLIOAGRAN MOM. WREN SEIZOTEDBY OMER. 2 ..21,2orr nips sw.61,51.11VERIAINVIRIIIMING1PINGP2P1OANDFINF2-0F903.1,... •33,3tiwrni333930.3.311C-(3.911ED. 3. 41.1.191VER POO( LISEOZHALL BE 9,6,101111MINE, 4. ALLS0e.uno.ponpupErm21.1.1-canerr (IF ReelwALTAPPRCPRIATE 9022 . 31.3339331.3.3313111-301333F-13331.131.11.3v3•13.413[3.1331310111391 ¥41111E031419 1.33,333 31-1,3331111553.13.113-7.333333.13,3TEPEOFT311F1.3310SCAPEOOHR4C113131.7711EVAEOF 11131,41/3.3. T. THE POE 1111.1.11.161.1 OPALL DEMOSPHOIRASPIPPOEPOCIOIT11.11.01.4054PLETED. B. NOLAREE1PEE39406.11BEMANTEWEITHIHIOPEETCPAIN OIXOTI.P.OR stow OA.. 131,39,.3. c011110.2-1-. sHALL VEMP/LOOrriati OF 311.3133 PRIOR TO EEONIPIGIOPPOLEISTPLIATIOOL LPNOECAPIAACPPEECTTOPPPROVEPLROVIECPIH7OR.W- LOPATPOPE 1.31.311.3311391T133.31011 MALL BE RESPDX3333.3 301311.313/3.03 UllArry 431E3 WAGED 0(13333113/33ING. 9. ELT (3371313.111.1,3919.133.330.3333 111M,.33,.,310N. 191.393L SHALL MAIMED -RI YOFT9P0313/3131131333331,31.1.13 311.0331131310311301313.11o33T31E3.911111.333313.11..E.41093131333.1.39311113[1333131033 033.131re Cows Na3R39149.3314333.333.430 03133LTY1311111E WM. ESCIRIO OWE RULES FGR ALL ELECTRIC ,3331333,314933,1333.3. ZAMZE CONTPACOMSHOUGOOLOITEE ALL IIMPAXPESHIPPR2P-POrIMPESIAL TO EE HEDY DEMME-PGA A PER= OP ONE .1)150,11.PO4 PPIPLACCEPTANCE OPINE PROM, 0011TR4OTOR .PLACE AMP PLANT MEM. FOLPOPPOEEEGFEL-TIVE OPIEWNE PER100 OP GWYN= 4tnesebtrrsti212onvoli, 2.21.1,121.1. KmacEutprr pecE9902.7.1)BV Wage BY MOO OR OIEBACNIJue TO 9.331Knaorr timatwncon4A7a.290.1ENLE. PAE.OE 14. XL PUNT 1RRTERIV. IOVETMEETAA.EPPOIFICKEOMPPOR 40.1 ORPOE, IRRIGATION NOTES: 3111.111.103031E33649,3101/63393,310.33331.00.33133RFR6A1414C9t STREET5M3331.331.11133, re02.212 • otiGhTIONS16.1.10 11.1JOE.SPLIAVIZAD8,VALVESPAOCONT1011111.2. 3. AV:1.RM METERANDE31:11FLGW 13334133303.133/ BE 303111330(SEELITILITY R,130. LANDSCAPE GRADING NOTES: 1.totrttcrola TO mum ALL PREPS 011 THE LM4.P&PUh MOJI.E.HO 106,11.PFAVAY, 14.14..15) BEEM2 soca.. 2. TOP SOIL MAU- BE =Irmo FROM ALL cur ono PI.L.PRO4.ESOCOPLE0 REOlarlINTED 0415, wow Amos. PROVIDE MOM. MO SE1911.01TATIP11 panto. WM. "WOLFS 111.1i1N6 Otristacnoti 3. TILL BOOTOA DO11.POOPY PESEEL 4. HEMMEN, ROMS SAREERMAN 11PEASORED IN LAPPIEST ERECTION. ORADEP11. AHEM lOWSPEVIIPCOPOYE SLOPEAWAY PROMPPLONO. 0. 31113RADED ARM TO RECEIVE SEM OR 300.1W SOL STRAY AM NAM MEL HEALTHY 31,6610 O P OW. POOBELEJEO. LAWN SODDING NOTES ▪ POKEPPOmPpePOPIWoun roan r3•113313.9.933333.333,m939133...3139.1933133333r33.3 RE31/11317-33 GULLY 19.3611,11.0.11E2,1115.4. PAPASTOPECEIVESEOD. A3EASIORECERESCOMAILBECLE04DFCE00ANDFREEOFWEE68.. 2114...v.m141.11E-21028,111/05111W0F1142.0APANICAT.B.I.Pf,ORRYEAPPEADATA CFR. 7011,21,0044. 2-1.01.01ET10013. 01112£1.1714A0.6.12a2.1,1111.3...20 ESTABUSHEDLAntl. 3. 1131311913303331.LUE3111.1133PATSLY.73133E301110.4/3331331£011.3.13,059331>ulyeen/333.9 1.03STS013333,333EGER13333TION3/10133.333.131,13334331333•TH33333333,333_3333393v3. 33.340711333 3T1.103 OF E0TAEL391E0 L33.119.03.30 THE CORE MOMS. WE. RES 03 GROOM 3.39.33:3,333.9 00 111,,. le 0 30PP.P- tr4 1 11 ij HATCH LEGEND: SOCEED AREAS .110001/19.1.1101.99111,114/.111591. . 911.1.1110,11 n pinw..2,angia 0.411.0P4P .111.01ArleR10.0,011./.18 DROP eurF0111.11, war .3393..31313 1110419.11f otel..1 1100L11.1.90,1 ,3.0.33.1r33.3. 000LOCNOPOrt \mire me..333933./ 9119.1.01.11 9100114.61. 3391133totox MO ROM 0.10110.1111.9 11.1.11,91.4.1 13,33,33.3 W.11010011 1.11114-14.1.19, 33 MIX.. pi. Omit.. Po, 19 10 LEE .11 330 ItrrAf CITISIP V'!" 110 GO 492 LANDSCAPE PLAN PRISIFCT 73.7DIM NAME, _Nair_ DESIGNED.: 0014 511119a1S0 Q. POPP,E,ME, CHECKED BPI SOY. DAM: _FOIBPZID_ SHEET L1.0 OF MARVIN POTENIlALALL.SRMENET — — (3REENWAY PATH OPTIONS — GREENWAYEY OTHERS — • • 209E ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY PLAN — BIKEWAYIPEDESTRIAN PATH I• NEW ROADWAYS • • OPTIONAL ROADWAYS DEVELOPMENT DEPENDENT) S EXISTING CARSON EN IMPROVEMENTS um CROSSINGS - RAILROAD CROSSING OPTIONS mos FUNDED ROADWAYS ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS ion YEAR FLOODPLAIN BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY WAT€RBODIES —STREAMS SASE MAP LEGEND STUDY LIMITS • COUNTY BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARIES —RAILROAD U.S. ROUTE 460 LAND USE AND CONNECTIVITY STUDY POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY, VA — SEPTEMBER 2022 i P °..'TIMMONS GRROUXP DROOMFIAPEi r r'�-- Ise OM WAN1L� _ anN.E1. ! I n,arnl ousHommo mEN ,..""'° HREDEIZNIaNc 91I��I�Ifp��ff11 lF#I��I��I�R�i�Nflf}1If{I�il�ffi�ft�fIfflfffflRlll�l��l�ffl�liAl�tlllfi�� ; ' r.f��ifA�� -------_........._ -r_. P..� rrras�rrn MOH sick. NA SPA- EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE: 1 PUSHED METAL ROOF ILOR - REGAL BLUE SOFFIT, FASCIA, FLASHING R-MATCH ROOF COLOR) UIME IZE CH 5F FRAME COLOR STUCCO SW 9102 $WHOA SPLITFACE WATERTABLE COURSE OLD CASTLE " WHITE SPLIT FACE BLOCK {BELOW WATEATABLE) AL STEEL HM DOORS/FRAMES OLD CASTLE • BEIGE NS, PAINT - PAINT SW 2735 ROCHWEED 4 0 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN M. TODD ALBRITTON ARCHITECT ❑ ❑ ❑ m mstHANTANHATAHIAATAAmm NEW TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA EAST THOME SON STREET THOMASTONNE7N,, Rcw TE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARY PROJECT RATE NM. PROJECT NUMBER EMPAS Sy um LAROMID EQUAL EQUAL �xeM.�,eA ram, 0 FRONT ELEVATION 0 SIDE ELEVATION - ENTRY 0 SIDE ELEVATION - EXIT M. TODDA16HITTON ARCHITECT ❑ ❑ ❑ i�wSeeN., 4faxNce mieoaJlbmm�e u� � @prvamm NEW TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA EAST MPSCN STREET T}CMASTON GEORGIA MOS MARK DATE DESORPTION SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARY PROJECT DATE. O.. PROJECT NiJmaEa. w PR.2 ••• • • vESI. e 1Y.117 4.1r."1,5111r, a .41 Ne: Attractive Facilities Attractive Facilities JUNUNOTED WASH CLUBWash you. ear cia dr, It you want' refill LAMS OF MINS PlItOTKIIIONI 549" MIWITSIMAMWMM - .. .it ,..:. NI; 1 •-ci [ 1;7 E 9 115;1 CI .*: 1:i? tii? . A,1.,.. • zzi i L3 Cil T. ' '(:-.-- - F'.:' - ' -rg-- , , '• - i _:_yut,..L.: OUP FISST WA 516,!_ 5-....— IMMIIIMIAMVOM6AV Professional Landscaping • 111,141/ 46. *"..* ..14 I * /oft, TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA ,'RE LVED! S US APART ;OM S IS OUR ENT TO THE IES THAT WE VE OFFER R.AISING NITIES FOR CHURCHES, JPS, SPORTS & MORE. A TIDAL WAVE E.ms4+fre vacuums DATE December 6 1a 16 P°aAaoea ncT°T„E Upson -Lee North Elementary PTO i$ Two thousand two hundred fifty and no/100 oXLAA 2,250.00 TIDAL AUTO IPA WE GIVE BACK! TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA BELIEVES IN GIVING BACK TO THE CITIES THAT WE CALL HOME. ON THE 3RD FRIDAY OF SEPTEMBER EVERY YEAR, EACH LOCATION DONATES 100% OF ALL SALES MADE THAT DAY TO A CHARITY OR NON-PROFIT GROUP, WITH A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THOSE THAT SERVE CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. OVER THE PAST 11YEARS, TIDAL WAVE AUTO SPA HAS DONATED OVER $500,000 TO CHARITIES WITH PROCEEDS FROM CHARITY DAY ALONE. SOME LOCAL RECIPIENTS INCLUDE: ANNANDALE VILLAGE; BIG BROTHERS/BIG SISTERS; ST. JUDE HOSPITAL; FLORENCE COUNTY DISABILITIES FOUNDATION & AMERICAN RED CROSS AT A REGULAR' MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ;SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2006 ORDINANCE 072506-8 TO REZONE 17.24 ACRES FROM 11-C, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO C2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT" WITH CONDITION, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RETAIL SALES FACILITY LOCATED AT THE 3900 BLOCKOF F CHALLENGER AVENUE NEAR .THE INTERSECTION OF VALLEY GATEWAY BOULEVARD (TAX MAP NO. 60 1-1-5.44, VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF KAHN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 2000, and the cond reading and public hearing were held July 25, 2006; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a pubiic hearing on this matter on July 10, 2006; and legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Vi rginia, as That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 17.24 acres, as described herein, and located at the 3900 block of Challenger Avenue near the intersection of Valley Gateway Boulevard (Tax Map Number 50.01-1-5.5) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I1-C, Industrial District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C2C, General Commercial District 2. That this action is taken upon the appl Company, Inc: cation of Kahn Developrr'rent 3. . That a pardon of this property was included in the 9989 rezoning upon a petition by the Industrial Development Authority of a 105 acre parcel from residential to industrial, at which time the following conditions were placed an the property; which. conditions are now being REMOVED a. The property will not include permitted uses for: i, Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products: ii; Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards: iii. Outside flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. b. That all locational signage (Sec. 21-9 ([))) will be aesthetically pleasing and be not more than forty (40) square feet in sign face and no more than eight (8) feet in height, Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. c. That all utilities will be underground. d. That there will be no on -street parking. e. That there will be sufficient truck loading spaces designed for each building site, as necessary. That the Petitioner will evaluate the drainage situation for the subject tracts and implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two (2) year storm (as required by Roanoke County) and the retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. g. That primary access to the property will be limited to Route 460. h. Building placement and parking will be designed to not impede the future widening of one additional lane along Routes 460 and 758. Should out -parcels be subdivided along Route 460 frontage (Parcel A), access will be provided via an internal road network plan utilizing the existing median cut on Route 460. Type E (Option 2) buffer and screening and requirements will be provided between Parcel "A" and single-family residences. All Roanoke County screening and buffering requirements will be implemented as specific development occurs. k. Existing oak trees on Parcel "A" will be preserved to the extent allowing for. feasible development of the subject parcel. I. All internal thoroughfares will be designed and constructed to'VOOT standards for future dedication. m. Dust mitigation controls will be implemented during site excavation activities. n;,: The developer will cooperate with the Roanoke County Utility Department to provide necessary utility eaments(s) for a sanitary sewer submain along Route 758 (Carson Road) at a mutually agreed upon location: That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Before a certificate of occupancy can be issued for any building constructed along the southern border of the property, a row of staggered evergreen trees will be installed along said southern border at or nearthe top of the slope above the existing storm water detention facility, Trees will be spaced 12' on center and will extend from one end of the building or buildings along that border to the other end. It is estimated that this would result in the planting of no more than 45 trees. (2) Screening shall be provided for HVAC rooftop units on the building or buildings located along the southern border of the property in order to shield those units from the view of residentssituateddirectly behind the Integrity Windows facility. Screening shall be in the form of covers or parapet walls, and shall be a neutral color. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on lntegrity Drive (formerly Woods Farm Road) being the northeastern corner of the hereinafter described parcel as shown on a Plat from Survey', and Records showing Dedication of Right of Way and Easements for Integrity Drive from Tract "B Tract "C" and Tract "D", Valley Gateway Business Park dated September 5, 2003, made by HSMM and recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 27, page 23 (the "Plat"), then along Integrity Drive 914.14 feet to a point marking the southeastern corner of Tract "C" as shown on the Plat; then N. 67 degrees 24' 04" East 781.46' to a point marking the southwest corner of Tract "C" as shown on the Plat; thence N. 01 degrees 29' 30" West 1077.57' to a point marking the northwestern corner of Tract "C" as shown an the Plat; thence N 83 degrees 52' a2" East 783.75' to the point of beginning, being Tract "C" containing 17.2432 Acres as shown on the Plat. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its. final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the sarne hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by On motion of Supervisor Altizerto adopt the ordinance with the proffers dated July 25, 2006, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Altizer, Flora, Wray NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: $4.'6/11"- Brenda J. Heil n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning Janet cheid , Chief Planner William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Aerial Map Martie Murphy 3939 Valley Gateway Blvd Size: 5.995 Acres Magisterial District: Vinton Current Zoning: C2 / C2C Proposed Zoning: C2S / C2CS SUP: Car Wash Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 3 /2 3/2 02 3 1:2 , 2 5 7 - o o ,. o M crAd J r ©jr`Fata Roanokel Count-y�Weriyinia 2019 ,! Zoning Map Martie Murphy 3939 Valley Gateway Blvd Size: 5.995 Acres Magisterial District: Vinton Current Zoning: C2 / C2C Proposed Zoning: C2S / C2CS SUP: Car Wash Zoning C1 C2 11 R1 R3 E Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 PO JOKE Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 3 /2 3/2 02 3 1:2 , 2 5 7 Future Land Use Map Martie Murphy 3939 Valley Gateway Blvd Size: 5.995 Acres Magisterial District: Vinton Current Zoning: C2 / C2C Proposed Zoning: C2S / C2CS SUP: Car Wash Future Land Use Neighborhood Conservation Transition Core Principal Industrial E Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 3 /2 3/2 02 3 1:2 , 2 5 7 w re I f 1 f 1 SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -Family Dwelling * Two -Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Assembly (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 1 of 5 Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Automobile Dealership * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast * Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Commercial Indoor Amusement Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center* Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 2 of 5 Kennel, Commercial * Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General Retail Sales Short-term Renal * Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Car Wash * Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 3 of 5 Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 4 of 5 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 5 of 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2006 ORDINANCE 072506-8 TO REZONE 17.24 ACRES FROM I1-C, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO C2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RETAIL SALES FACILITY LOCATED AT THE 3900 BLOCKOF CHALLENGER AVENUE NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF VALLEY GATEWAY BOULEVARD (TAX MAP NO. 50.01-1-5.5), VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF KAHN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 2006, and the second reading and public hearing were held July 25, 2006; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 10, 2006; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 17.24 acres, as described herein, and located at the 3900 block of Challenger Avenue near the intersection of Valley Gateway Boulevard (Tax Map Number 50.01-1-5.5) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I1-C, Industrial District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C2C, General Commercial District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Kahn Development Company, Inc. 3. That a portion of this property was included in the 1989 rezoning upon a petition by the Industrial Development Authority of a 105 acre parcel from residential to industrial, at which time the following conditions were placed on the property; which conditions are now being REMOVED: a. The property will not include permitted uses for: Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products: ii. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards: iii. Outside flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. b. That all Iocational signage (Sec. 21-93(D)) will be aesthetically pleasing and be not more than forty (40) square feet in sign face and no more than eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. c. That all utilities will be underground. d. That there will be no on -street parking. e. That there will be sufficient truck loading spaces designed for each building site, as necessary. f. That the Petitioner will evaluate the drainage situation for the subject tracts and implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two (2) year storm (as required by Roanoke County) and the retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. g. That primary access to the property will be limited to Route 460. h. Building placement and parking will be designed to not impede the future widening of one additional lane along Routes 460 and 758. i. Should out -parcels be subdivided along Route 460 frontage (Parcel A), access will be provided via an internal road network plan utilizing the existing median cut on Route 460. j. Type E (Option 2) buffer and screening and requirements will be provided between Parcel "A" and single-family residences. All Roanoke County screening and buffering requirements will be implemented as specific development occurs. k. Existing oak trees on Parcel "A" will be preserved to the extent allowing for feasible development of the subject parcel. I. All internal thoroughfares will be designed and constructed to VDOT standards for future dedication. m. Dust mitigation controls will be implemented during site excavation activities. n. The developer will cooperate with the Roanoke County Utility Department to provide necessary utility easements(s) for a sanitary sewer submain along Route 758 (Carson Road) at a mutually agreed upon location. 2 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Before a certificate of occupancy can be issued for any building constructed along the southern border of the property, a row of staggered evergreen trees will be installed along said southern border at or near the top of the slope above the existing storm water detention facility. Trees will be spaced 12' on center and will extend from one end of the building or buildings along that border to the other end. It is estimated that this would result in the planting of no more than 45 trees. (2) Screening shall be provided for HVAC rooftop units on the building or buildings located along the southern border of the property in order to shield those units from the view of residents situated directly behind the Integrity Windows facility. Screening shall be in the form of covers or parapet walls, and shall be a neutral color. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on Integrity Drive (formerly Woods Farm Road) being the northeastern corner of the hereinafter described parcel as shown on a Plat from Survey and Records showing Dedication of Right of Way and Easements for Integrity Drive from Tract "B", Tract "C" and Tract "D", Valley Gateway Business Park dated September 5, 2003, made by HSMM and recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 27, page 23 (the "Plat"), then along Integrity Drive 914.14 feet to a point marking the southeastern corner of Tract "C" as shown on the Plat; then N. 67 degrees 24' 04" East 781.46' to a point marking the southwest corner of Tract "C" as shown on the Plat; thence N. 01 degrees 29' 30" West 1077.57' to a point marking the northwestern corner of Tract "C" as shown on the Plat; thence N 83 degrees 52' 32" East 783.75' to the point of beginning, being Tract "C" containing 17.2432 Acres as shown on the Plat. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the ordinance with the proffers dated July 25, 2006, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Altizer, Flora, Wray NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 4 Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the proj ected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. Principal Industrial: A future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: Agricultural - Industries which involve the manufacturing, storage, marketing and wholesaling of agricultural products. These industries may also be located outside of the Principal Industrial areas, within the rural designations, where agricultural skills may be found. Small Industries and Custom Manufacturing - These industries typically serve a local market and may involve the on -site production of goods by hand manufacturing. Mining and Extraction - These facilities locate according to the availability of natural resources. Industrial - Conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers, storage yards. Industrial Parks - Large tracts of land that are subdivided, developed and designed according to a unified plan. These parks are employment centers and may include mixed land uses including supporting retail services. These types of industries are encouraged to develop in Principal Industrial areas. Planned industrial parks should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian paths into their designs and link these features to surrounding neighborhoods where appropriate. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where industry has historically developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations zoned industrial. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AREAS - Locations identified by Roanoke County as an economic opportunity area. EMPLOYMENT CENTERS - Locations where labor-intensive industries exist. TOPOGRAPHY - Locations that can be developed in an environmentally sensitive manner and that are outside of the designated floodplain. RESOURCE PROTECTION - Locations that can be developed in such a way as not to threaten valuable natural resources. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND SUPPLY - Locations where water and sewer service exist or can be provided in the near future. ACCESS - Locations served by an adequate public street system that does not direct traffic through existing residential neighborhoods. TRANSPORTATION CENTERS - Locations within close proximity to rail, airport and major street systems. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by, or in close proximity to urban services. Martie Murp Special use permit to operate a car wash c acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Con 2C, High Intensity Commercial Distric Board of Supervisors Public May 23, 2023 (3:00 p.r • 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard • 5.995 Acres • Current Use: Vacant • SUP for Car Wash 3 Project Site 4 Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Photograph 7 Photograph • A portion of the subject parcel was previo parcel adjoining to the south (Tax Map# 0 • Before property lines were adjusted, this p( was rezoned in 2006 from 1-1 C, Industrial D C-2C, General Commercial District with cc construction of a retail sales facility. • Two conditions are associated with this re2 plantings and the screening of HVAC roof' adjacent parcel). The applicant is not plat the portion of the parcel which contains ti 8 Zoning Backgr• • The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance d "washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include c and self-service car washes:" • A car wash is only permitted in the C-2, Hi< District, with an approved special use perr and design standards listed in Section 3O- County Code as follows: (A) General standards: 1. All new car wash facilities, whether convel shall be equipped with a water recycling sys percent of the water used. 9 Zoning Backgr• 10 COnl, MCP., r2.11 711C -,11- r.rn—mor C1.171. 114,1,,RIATMEIRTIC,VMSICII ,16../C. GAWP -491 Concept Pia � s f ' /z SHRUB PLANTING 11 Landscaping 43,6" GABLE M•10%. • ======= 11 0 FRONTLEVATION hill'" P.11N111111111111111111111111111111111111 ' 1 0 S ICE ELEVATION - ENTRY IHII 10 11111111111110 0iDELEVATIO - L 12 Architectural Rend ealA6un ' eitimad 13 Photographs in AppIi Existing Zoning • C-2 - High Intensity Commercial • C-2C - High Intensity Commercial with Conditions Surrounding Zoning • North - C-2, C-2S • East - C-2, C-2S, 1-1 • West - C-2, R-1, C-1 C • South - C-2C, 1-1 375 ;221j 14 Zoning Core • Core is a Future Land Use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. • Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. • Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. • Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. • The proposed car wash is consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. Future Land U 1 15 Principal Industrial • Principal Industrial is a Future Land Use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. • Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. • The proposed car wash is not consistent with the Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation. • The proposed subdivided parcel does not include this land use designation and the development would be located only within the area designated Core. Future Land U 16 -< 4 ILSIE FL- Route 460 Stu Public Hearing -May 2, 2023 • No citizens spoke during the public h • Planning Commission summarized tv comments received which expresses car wash and the desire for restaurai • Planning Commission discussed the f • Details of the Proposed Project • Future Land Use Designations (Core & P • Proffered Conditions from 2006 Rezoning 18 Planning Commit Planning Commission recommends special use permit for a car wash w 1. The car wash shall be developed in substar the concept plans and landscaping plan fc prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landsc any changes required during the compreh process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substc with the architectural renderings titled New prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to c during the building plan review process. 19 Planning Commit Question 20 (4/14/2023) Alyssa Dunbar - [EXTERNAL] - Bonsack Area Car Wash Page 1 From: Vera Chitwood <vmchitwood©icloud.com> To: <adunbar©roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 4/13/2023 8:06 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Bonsack Area Car Wash Hi, I live in the Bonsack area of Roanoke and recently saw a posting regarding a permit to operate a car wash in the Kroger Square area of Bonsack. Your name was listed and I wanted to email, as I am unable to attend the public hearings regarding this potential project. If you are not the person I should contact, please let me know or forward my email to whomever it should go to. I would like to strongly encourage the Planning Commission to not approve yet another car wash in the Bonsack area. We already have 2 car washes- one already exists in the Bonsack Kroger square and another one is less than one mile down the road. These car washes are plenty for this area of town. What we need is someone to encourage development of restaurants and family establishments down this way. I have lived in Bonsack for almost 14 years and it seems that all anyone wants to build are fast food restaurants, banks and car washes. We have several Mexican and Italian restaurants that are wonderful, but they are very taste specific, and don't offer a lot of variety. People who live here don't want to drive to Valley View or Tanglewood to get restaurant variety- yet we are forced to sit in traffic on 460 to get there because of our limited selection in our area. I would really like to discourage the car wash plans and encourage people to work on getting businesses to come to Bonsack. Our area is growing and populated, and I know everyone down here would love to see places being built where we could support. Sincerely, Vera Chitwood ********************************************************************** * WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. Page 1 of 1 Alyssa Dunbar - [EXTERNAL] - New Development Proposed - Car Wash From: Sarah Thompson <hansonsm0l@hotmail.com> To: "adunbar@roanokecountyva.gov" <adunbar@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 5/3/2023 1:55 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - New Development Proposed - Car Wash Dear Ms. Dunbar, I am a Roanoke County resident and am writing to you today regarding the new car wash proposed by Martie Murphy at the Kroger Square in Bonsack. I cannot make it to the meetings, but would like to voice my family's opinion on the matter. We are opposed to another car wash in the area. There is another car wash in the same shopping complex. It doesn't make sense. Since undeveloped land along 460 is scarce, please develop it properly. We would like to see nice sit down restaurants, farmers market type stores, or healthy eating options in the area. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, Mrs. Thompson Roanoke County Resident WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. file :///C:/Users/adunbar/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/645267EAP01 _DOMAINA-L_P... 5/3/2023 Page 1 of 1 Philip Thompson - [EXTERNAL] - Nay to the proposed Car wash at valley gateway From: Akea Darb <aprylbutler@gmail.com> To: <rejames@roanokecountyva.gov>, <bos@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 5/7/2023 7:37 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Nay to the proposed Car wash at valley gateway INCOMING EMAIL SECURITY WARNING: This message may contain Sensitive Information. You cannot include the sensitive information in the reply to this message. When replying to this message, DO NOT include the original message. If the need arises to communicate sensitive or confidential information outside of the Roanoke County system, contact your TC. There are currently 2 car washes on 460 near or at the kroger at valley gateway in Bonsack. With the growth rate we are experiencing and the newly proposed new traffic flow another car wash is the last thing we need. The 2 car washes we have hardly have any business and does no business on rainy days. Give the people more sit down and dine food options or more entertainment options so we don't have to go into town near the malls to spend our money to socialize. I have a feeling most people will boycott another carwash, so who wins with that? Join our Bonsack neighborhood Facebook here page https://www.facebook.com/groups/2289411631184717/?ref=share and ask what the people want. We can't all with our busy lives make it out to a meeting in the middle of the day. WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. file : ///C :/Users/pthomp son/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/645 8B 6F CPO2_DOMAINM-... 5/9/2023 Page 1 of 2 Cecelia Thomas - Re: [EXTERNAL] - May 2 (RCPC Forwarded Email) From: Rick James <rjames@adamspaving.com> To: <the5niceiys@gmail.com> Date: 5/1/2023 9:28 PM Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] - May 2 (RCPC Forwarded Email) Cc: Cecelia Thomas <CTHOMAS@roanokecountyva.gov>, Philip Thompson <pthompson... Sherry, Thank you for your email below outlining your concerns regarding the proposed Bonsack car wash. I want to first let you know what my obligation is as a planning commissioner. We are to look at each of the applications based on the current and land use proposed, not concerning ourselves with the need for or whether it's the highest and best use, but looking at it solely as to whether or not, it is an appropriate land use for the parcel of land in question. Ironically, we have for public hearing scheduled for tomorrow night and two of the 4 are for car washes proposed in a C-2 high intensity commercial district. A car wash is not a "by right" use in the C-2 zoning district and they are therefore asking for a special use permit which allows us to apply conditions, should we decide to approve it. Like you, I would much prefer another use, such as a restaurant for this parcel; however, I cannot base my vote on whether or not we need another car wash, but rather is this site zoned and located appropriately for the use as a car wash? I will listen to the applicant intently tomorrow night, and vote accordingly. FYI- Should this application move forward to the board of supervisors with either a positive or negative vote from the planning commission, they will have more latitude to consider other things in addition to land use. I do appreciate your input. Rick On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:54 PM Rick James <REJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov> wrote: Forwarded from rejames@roanokecountyva.gov by rule. Forwarded message From: <the5nicelys a,gmail.com> To: Rick James <REJAMES@,roanokecountyva.gov> Cc: Bcc: Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 20:53:37 -0400 file :lll C:/Users/cmonnin/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/64502EF7PO1_DOMAINA-L_P... 5/2/2023 Page 2 of 2 Subject: [EXTERNAL] - May 2 Hello. I am unable to make the meeting tomorrow night about the plan for a car wash near the Bonsack Kroger. We do not need or want another car wash. Blue Hills, Zips, and the new one at Sheetz are plenty for our area. Plus the ones on 604. We need businesses that will bring people to our area, not just another business to fill up space. Another restaurant option would be great. (McAlister or five guys or Chopt would be great.) Thank you. Sherry Nicely Sent from my iPhone ********************************************************************** * WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. * Rick James Adams Construction Company file:///C :/Users/cmonnin/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/645 02EF7PO l _DOMAINA-L_P... 5/2/2023 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MARTIE MURPHY TO OPERATE A CAR WASH ON APPROXIMATELY 5.995 ACRES OF LAND ZONED C-2 (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND C-2C (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS), LOCATED AT 3939 VALLEY GATEWAY BOULEVARD (TAX MAP NO: 050.01-01-05.06-0000), IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Martie Murphy has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land which is split zoned C-2 (High Intensity Commercial) District and C-2C (High Intensity Commercial) District with existing conditions, located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard (Tax Map No: 050.01-01-05.06- 0000), in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the said property contains the following two (2) conditions imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #072506-8 adopted on July 25, 2006: (1) Before a certificate of occupancy can be issued for any building constructed along the southern border of the property, a row of staggered evergreen trees will be installed along said southern border at or near the top of the slope above the existing storm water detention facility. Trees will be spaced 12' on center and will extend from one end of the building or buildings along that border to the other end. It is estimated that this would result in the planting of no more than 45 trees. (2) Screening shall be provided for HVAC rooftop units on the building or buildings located along the southern border of the property in order to shield those units from the view of residents situated directly behind the Integrity Windows facility. Screening shall be in the form of covers or parapet walls, and shall be a neutral color. WHEREAS, the petitioner has not requested amendment or removal of the two (2) conditions imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #072506-8 adopted on July 25, 2006; and Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 2023, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 23, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition to obtain a special use permit, with two conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed special use meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The special use permit is hereby approved, with the following conditions: a. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plans and landscaping plan for Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc. dated February 3, 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landscaping plan), subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. b. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled New Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. Page 2 of 3 4. The two (2) conditions imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #072506-8 adopted on July 25, 2006 shall remain. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 3 of 3 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 SAMPLE MOTIONS Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS The petition of Martie Murphy to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 5.995 acres of land zoned C-2 (High Intensity Commercial District) and C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with conditions), located at 3939 Valley Gateway Boulevard, Vinton Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit with the following conditions: 1. The car wash shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plans and landscaping plan for Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by EMC Engineering Services, Inc. dated February 3, 2023 (site plans) and March 9, 2023 (landscaping plan), subject to any changes required during the comprehensive site plan review process. 2. The car wash shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the architectural renderings titled New Tidal Wave Auto Spa prepared by M. Todd Albritton, subject to any changes required during the building plan review process. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed special use permit request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan or good zoning practice, and/or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Open district appointments BACKGROUND: 1. Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals: Robert Arthur's five (5) year term representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District expired June 30, 2022. Richard L. Jones, Jr.'s five (5) year term representing the Catawba Magisterial District will expire June 30, 2023. Supervisor Martha Hooker has recommended the reappointment of Mr. Jones to an additional term to expire June 30, 2028. Confirmation has been placed on the Consent Agenda. 2. Roanoke County Economic Development Authority (EDA)(appointed by District): Steve Musselwhite's four-year term on the EDA expired on September 26, 2021 and he does not wish to be reappointed. 3. Roanoke County Library Board (appointed by District): The following District appointments remain open: Page 1 of 2 Vinton Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District 4. Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District): The following appointments remain open: Mike Roop's three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 2019. Rich Tomlinson's three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 2021. Murray Cook's three (3) year term representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District expired June 30, 2020. There is also one open Windsor Hills Magisterial District appointee. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM H- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 23, 2023, designated as Item H - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 13 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — February 28, 2023 2. Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $51,000 for fiscal year 2024 for shuttle service to the National Park Service's McAfee Knob Trailhead Parking Lot, Catawba Magisterial District (Second Reading) 3. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $187,242 in Virginia Department of Transportation Open Container Funding for the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 (VDOT UPC No. 97171) Project, Catawba Magisterial District (Second Reading) 4. The petition of Larry and Rhonda Conner to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 1.32 acres of land zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 5859 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hill Magisterial District (First Reading and request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 5. The petition of Parker Design Group, Inc. to obtain a special use permit for religious assembly on approximately 2.91 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located on Oakland Boulevard between 233 Hershberger Road and 4843 Oakland Boulevard, Hollins Magisterial District (First Reading and request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 6. Resolution approving the first Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Agreement Page 1 of 2 7. Resolution approving the first Amendment to the County Attorney's Employment Agreement 8. Confirmation of appointment to the Community Policy & Management Team (CPMT); Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (TPO); Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission; Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee; Virginia Western Community College Board; Western Virginia Water Authority 9. Resolution accepting a donation of a recycling trailer from Cox Communications for additional capacity at Fallowater Lane 10. Resolution requesting the U.S. Department of Transportation fund a Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant to install Electric Vehicle Chargers in Roanoke 11. Request to approve fiscal agent agreement for the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection (RCACP 12. Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority 13. Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $51,000 for fiscal year 2024 for shuttle service to the National Park Service's McAfee Knob Trailhead Parking Lot, Catawba Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Megan G. Cronise Assistant Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and appropriate funding to operate the McAfee Knob Trailhead Shuttle for fiscal year 2024. BACKGROUND:. McAfee Knob is one of the most photographed locations on the Appalachian National Scenic Trail (AT). The National Park Service (NPS) trailhead parking lot on Route 311 that provides access to McAfee Knob has been insufficient to meet heavy visitor volumes for several years and parking challenges have increased during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The NPS has been studying the AT Triple Crown Area (Dragon's Tooth, McAfee Knob and Tinker Cliffs) since 2017. The U.S. Department of Transportation's Volpe Center completed a Transit Feasibility Study for the NPS in February 2021, which was intended to provide a foundation for a pilot program for shuttle service during the upcoming construction of the AT pedestrian bridge over Route 311, slated to begin in early 2024. When the Transit Feasibility Study was presented to County staff in early 2021, staff contended that shuttle service could be utilized immediately due to the vastly increased visitation rates and parking issues observed in 2020. The DRPT Demonstration Project Assistance grant opportunity offers a means to test Page 1 of 2 shuttle service prior to the pedestrian bridge construction to determine whether the service could be successful both during and after construction. Staff relied on data included in the Transit Feasibility Study for the grant application. The Board of Supervisors approved a resolution of support for the Demonstration Project Assistance grant at the January 25, 2022 meeting. DISCUSSION: The Commonwealth Transportation Board adopted the Six Year Improvement Program on June 21, 2022, which included Demonstration Project Assistance grant funding from DRPT. This state funding provides 80 percent of the net operating costs of the program. The remaining 20 percent of the net operating costs are required local match. The award letter represents funding for fiscal year 2023 in the amount of $57,120 and funding for fiscal year 2024 in the amount of $40,800 for a total award of $97,920. The Board of Supervisors accepted and appropriated $102,200 in funding for fiscal year 2023 at the September 13, 2022 meeting, which was comprised of funds from DRPT, County match and anticipated fare collection. Fiscal year 2024 funds in the amount of $40,800 from DRPT need to be appropriated for the program. There have been no changes since the first reading of this ordinance on May 9, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Required matching funds in the amount of $10,200 are available in the fiscal year 2023 CORTRAN operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. Page 2 of 2 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Jennifer B. DeBruhl DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (804) 786-4440 Director 600 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 2102 FAX (804) 225-3752 RICHMOND, VA 23219-2416 Virginia Relay Center 800-828-1120 (TDD) July 08, 2022 Megan Cronise Roanoke County Assistant Director of Planning Roanoke County Department of Planning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Cronise, On June 21, 2022, the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation's Fiscal Years 2023-2028 Six Year Improvement Program. I am pleased to report that the Board included $97,920 of state Demonstration Grant funds, which covers 80% of the total project cost, to operate transit service from the Interstate 81 Exit 140 Park and Ride Lot to the McAfee Knob Trailhead parking lot. This project will have a positive impact on connecting the citizens of the Commonwealth, and DRPT staff looks forward to working with you on implementing it. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jennifer B. DeBruhl AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 FOR SHUTTLE SERVICE TO THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE'S MCAFEE KNOB TRAILHEAD PARKING LOT IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the National Park Service's McAfee Knob Overlook is one of the most highly visited locations along the Appalachian National Scenic Trail; and WHEREAS, the proposed shuttle service was studied by the National Park Service as the baseline service scenario in the February 2021 Appalachian National Scenic Trail, Triple Crown Area Transit Feasibility Study; and WHEREAS, the proposed shuttle service is included as part of Recommendation 1.Z. in the Roanoke Valley Transit Vision Plan, which was approved by the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization on September 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, the proposed shuttle service to the National Park Service's McAfee Knob Trailhead Parking Lot meets the goals of the Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Demonstration Project Assistance grant by offering a creative approach in determining a new travel market for public transportation, as well as by improving the utilization and productivity of an existing public transportation service with a connection to the Smart Way bus route at the 1-81 Exit 140 Park and Ride; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County received $40,800 in Demonstration Project Assistance grant funding through DRPT for fiscal year 2024, which provides eighty (80) percent of net operating costs to operate the McAfee Knob Trailhead Shuttle; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, Roanoke County agrees to provide $10,200 for fiscal year 2024, which totals twenty (20) percent of net operating costs to match the DRPT operating funding; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 2023, and the second reading was held on May 23, 2023. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sum of $51,000 is accepted and appropriated for the purpose of the McAfee Knob Trailhead Shuttle program. 2. That this ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance accepting and appropriating $187,242 in Virginia Department of Transportation Open Container Funding for the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 (VDOT UPC No. 97171) Project, Catawba Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Megan G. Cronise Assistant Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and appropriate $187,242 in Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Open Container funding for the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 (VDOT UPC No. 97171) Project. BACKGROUND: Roanoke County is developing the West Roanoke River Greenway proposed between Green Hill Park in Roanoke County and West Riverside Drive in the City of Salem. The 1.4-mile section of greenway was phased in September 2022 in order to deliver the portion of the greenway where right-of-way had been obtained and design was complete. Phase 1 is a 0.6-mile section of greenway proposed with a trailhead parking lot on West Riverside Drive and will extend east along the Roanoke River to the existing greenway in the City of Salem across from Kingsmill Drive. Project updates since the last Board action on March 14, 2023, include: Two Agreements have been signed and executed by the City of Salem and Roanoke County (1) for the County to construct the greenway on property owned by Salem and provides for maintenance responsibilities after the construction is Page 1 of 2 complete, and (2) that allows Roanoke County to act as the permitting authority for Erosion and Sediment Control and the Virginia Stormwater Management Program for the entire project (including those areas within the City of Salem); The City of Salem Board of Zoning Appeals approved a variance for greenway project impacts within the floodway; and VDOT certified the right-of-way needed for the project. Staff continue to work with VDOT on remaining action items. Construction advertisement is anticipated in July 2023. DISCUSSION: In reconciling funding on the project in March 2023, it was discovered that VDOT added $187,242 in Open Container funds to this project in September 2022 to satisfy a funding deficit prior to phasing the project. This funding needs to be accepted and appropriated prior to execution of an updated Appendix A document that reflects all project funding. There have been no changes since the first reading of this ordinance on May 9, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Funds are 100 percent State/Federal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached ordinance. Page 2 of 2 West Roanoke River Greenway: Riverside Park to Green Hill Park Legend Parcels Owned by Roanoke County Streets -*-1—f-1 Railroad Tracks • W aterbodies Jurisdiction Boundary Roanoke River Greenway MOD P MOD West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1: West Riverside Drive Trailhead to Kingsmill Drive, UPC 97171 (Construction in 2023) West Riverside Drive Trailhead to be Constructed as Part of Phase 1 West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 2: West Riverside Drive Trailhead to Green Hill Park (Removed from scope in 2022) West Roanoke River Greenway: Riverside Park to Mill Lane (Removed from scope in 2021) c Existing Section October 2022 N A Feet 0 375 750 1,500 Roanoke County, UPC: 97171 CFDA # 20.205 Date: 4/24/2023 Appendix A Revision 4 Project Number: EN08-080-105 Locality: Roanoke County Project Location ZIP+4: 24153-1802 Locality UEI #: GX4HPU2KPHE3 Locality Address (incl ZIP+4): 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 ` Project Narrative Work Description: #HB2.FY17 WRRG Phase 1, Kingsmill Drive to New Trailhead - The Western Roanoke River Greenway that will ultimately provide a connection from Green Hill Park in Roanoke County to Riverside Park in the City of Salem. This project will construct Phase 1, from Kingsmill Drive to a new Trailhead located on West Riverside Drive. This section has 100% federal Open Container funds allocated. From: 2,900' East of Diuguids Lane To: Kingsmill Drive Locality Project Manager Contact info: Lindsay Webb (540) 777-6328 LWEBB@roanokecountvva.gov Department Project Coordinator Contact Info: Jessie Nester (540) 613-4115 Jessie. Nester(alvdot.virginia.gov Project Estimates i Preliminary Engineering Right of Way and Utilities Construction Total Estimated Cost Estimated Locality Project Expenses $1,000,304 $0 $11,431,438 $12,431,742 Estimated VDOT Project Expenses $120,000 $0 $20,000 $140,000 Estimated Total Project Costs $1,120,304 $0 $11,451,438 $12,571,742 Project Cost and Reimbursement Phase Estimated Project Costs Funds type (Choose from drop down box) Local % Participation for Funds Type Local Share Amount Maximum Estimated Reimbursement Reimbursement to (Estimated Cost - Local Locality (Max. Reimbursement - Share) Est. VDOT Expenses) Preliminary Engineering $1,120,304 RSTP 0% $0 $1,120,304 Total PE Right of Way & Utilities $1,120,304 $6,222,925 RSTP 0% $0 $0 $1,120,304 $1,000,304 $0 $6,222,925 Total RW Construction $668,786 Open Container Funds 0% $0 $668,786 $17,622 HSIP 0% $0 $17,622 $4,542,105 Smart Scale 0% $0 $4,542,105 Total CN $11,451,438 $0 $11,451,438 $11,431,438 Total Estimated Cost $12,571,742 $0 $12,571,742 $12,431,742 Total Maximum Reimbursement by VDOT to Locality (Less Local Share) $12,571,742 Estimated Total Reimbursement by VDOT to Locality (Less Local Share and VDOT Expenses) $12,431,742 Project Financing RSTP Smart Scale Open Container Funds HSIP Aggregate Allocations $7,343,229 $4,542,105 $668,786 $17,622 $12,571,742 Program and Project Specific Funding Requirements • This Project shall be administered in accordance with VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Manual • This is a limited funds project. The LOCALITY shall be responsible for any additional funding in excess of $12,571,742 • Reimbursement for eligible expenditures shall not exceed funds allocated each year by the Commonwealth Transportation Board in the Six Year Improvement Program. • All local funds included on this appendix have been formally committed by the local government's board or council resolution subject to appropriation. • Project estimate, schedule and commitment to funding are subject to the requirements established in the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) Policy and Guide for Implementation of the SMART SCALE Project Prioritization Process, Code of Virginia, and VDOT's Instructional and Informational Memorandums. • This Project shall be initiated and at least a portion of the Projects programmed funds expended within one year of the budgeted year of allocation or funding may be subject to reprogramming to other Projects selected through the prioritization process. In the event the Project is not advanced to the next phase of construction when requested by the CTB, the LOCALITY or Metropolitan Planning Organization may be required, pursuant to § 33.2-214 of the Code of Virginia, to reimburse the DEPARTMENT for all state and federal funds expended on the Project. • This Project has been selected through the Smart Scale (HB2) application and selection process and will remain in the SYIP as a funding priority unless certain conditions set forth in the CTB Policy and Guidelines for Implementation of a Project Prioritization Process arise. Pursuant to the CTB Policy and Guidelines for Implementation of a Project Prioritization Process and the SMART SCALE Reevaluation Guide, this Project will be re -scored and/or the funding decision re-evaluated if any of the following conditions apply: a change in the scope, an estimate increase, or a reduction in the locally/regionally leveraged funds. Applications may not be submitted in a subsequent SMART SCALE prioritization cycle to account for a cost increase on a previously selected Project. • This Project is funded with federal -aid Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds. These funds must be obligated within 12 months of allocation and expended within 36 months of the obligation. • This Project is funded with federal -aid Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds. These funds must be obligated within 12 months of allocation and expended within 36 months of the obligation. • This Appendix A supersedes all previous versions signed by VDOT and the LOCALITY. This attachment is certified and made an official attachment to this document by the parties to this agreement. Authorized Locality Official Date Authorized VDOT Official Date Revised: February 1, 2019 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $187,242 I N VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OPEN CONTAINER FUNDING FOR THE WEST ROANOKE RIVER GREENWAY PHASE 1 (VDOT UPC 97171) PROJECT, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County desires to construct segments of the Roanoke River Greenway between Montgomery County and Franklin County to complete the backbone of the Roanoke Valley greenway system; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is administering of the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 (VDOT UPC No. 97171) project proposed along West Riverside Drive in Roanoke County and the City of Salem; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved the re- allocation of $4,524,105 in previously appropriated SMART SCALE funding and the re- allocation of $4,352,469 in previously appropriated Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funding to the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 project grant account; WHEREAS, in September 2022, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) allocated $187,242 in Open Container funds to this project to satisfy a funding deficit prior to project phasing; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 2023, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 2023. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: Page 1 of 2 1. That the sum of $187,242 in Open Container funds is hereby accepted from the Virginia Department of Transportation and appropriated to the West Roanoke River Greenway Phase 1 project grant account; and 2. That Roanoke County hereby agrees to continue fulfilling the project administration agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation to provide the necessary oversight to ensure the project is developed in accordance with all state and federal requirements for design, right of way acquisition and construction of a federally funded transportation project; and 3. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby grants authority for the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator to execute project agreements. 4. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Larry and Rhonda Conner to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 1.32 acres of land zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 5859 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hill Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for June 27, 2023. The title of this ordinance is as follows: The petition of Larry and Rhonda Conner to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 1.32 acres of land zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 5859 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: Page 1 of 2 There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for June 27, 2023. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P o Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date reee. ed: a% a3 Re d ' coiA45 Applic ion fee: PC to" t,., Placards issued: 8Iatc: a Case Number 9 — (p j p.41 3 3 ALL APPLICANTS Check type ofa, placation filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning VSpecial Use o Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Larrvt d-(2.. ,da h [o 5 16 - m ,.iuu-6,2ri RV ad Roam J On, a'-6o [ 9 Owner's name/address w/zip S'ar►rt,e, as Property Location 5 5 5 9 Ste* 'loluel' rP\ef 341 Tax Map No.: Phone: Cell #: Email: Contact for Legal Ads Phone #: Cell #: Email: Magisterial District: j'j '�`k Community Planning area: Existing Zoning: '� kcihr th c Size of parcel(s): Acres: 3 Existing Land Use5Mj [ ) REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: 1..L 5 Proposed Land Use: l 4 ni 1 S Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No f:::I IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes e/No `:.. IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 1 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA Variance/Waiver of Section(s) Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning O ` na 6r Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to s, Is the application complete? PIease check it enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCE.I.ItArISTY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. of the Roanoke County Z 12 ping Ordina 0. er 060 Consultation Application Justification RJS 1 V/AA RZ'S/W/CP V/AA t 8 1/2" x 1 I" concept plan _ Application fee Metes and bounds description /i" Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners tsjA i1 JA- I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the roperty or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. e-r- Q Owner's Signature 2 Plan. 6.49144.1-�,� L JI.M,a.- Cu.rr qke, pAATAnt- Applicant Cz4t'1u?_r[4 1 The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. _ Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. pop.,64.idivA, Se -de (4 oiLikovd tAarbuld k acAL cY. a/1U 6,,,,cada__ bouiLLPAI rauz,246,ku .a a P , Please ex lain how the project conforms to the gener.1 guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Communi ct.. _ i sa..e.itdt; A ! arc ' p �t �-vc ID- iitite AtaklotiLems A l l + + d w .vie i uit/ tuum ,ApAd--6,4s . 0,,mui) w:AjzO k.,_e_Akt,a-LiAr- +0 .,, -( - w,li,A l'avvp/d Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services kot,,a, a d facilities, including water/sewer, roa s, schoAols�,parks/recreation a fire and rescue3 e Tv g fikqpie,,Omplik,e'3414,1- r. 1£oujv- chu` e u i 0 1,,,,, rp l pl4 uIA. h...e_ Zlit-Y MOO- 1 3 A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (152-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required far REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERILIIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule 1 certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. AThutlit&CAAAL€41 Signature of applicant Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Mufti -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19,2005 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. 74011Aa Cps Name of Petition Owl 6x/AALe4---D Petitioner's Signature 3,ag,;3 Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 ee( ippex 3/27/23, 12:47 PM Tax Parcel Viewer Search Tax Parcel Viewer 5859 Bent Mountain Rd, Roanoke 5859 Bent Mountain Rd 3 images: Tax Parcel ID: Launch OneView: Property Report: Demographic & Income Report by Click Here Radius: Business Summary Report by Drive Click Here Time: Traffic Count Report: Click Here Account Number 42737 Card Number 1 of 1 CONNER LARRY ; CONNER RHONDA Windsor Hills Neighborhood: C078-CORNTASSEL/POAGE VALLEY/RAN LYNN Deeded Acreage: 1.32000 AC Estimated Acreage: 1.3092 AC Legal Description: BACK CREEK Year Built: 1945 Structure Type: RANCH WITH BASEMENT Owner Name: Magisterial District: Property 096.01-04-19.00-0000 Click Here Click Here Broadband 1 https://taxview. roa n okecou n tyvagov/TaxVi ew/ 1/1 3/27/23, 1:34 PM Tax Parcel Viewer Search Tax Parcel Viewer 5859 Bent Mountain Rd, Roanoke Split Zoning: No Zoning Code: R1 Description: County-R1 Property Zoning Broadband J ti 4 https://taxview. roanokecountyva.gov/ TaxView/ 111 ...... - . - ,:i • ' 11 3/27/23, 2:40 PM Unique Creekside Cabin. Private yet close to town - Cabins for Rent in Roanoke, Virginia, United States -Airbnb X * 4.93.30 reviews 7-Search reviews Accuracy Communication Location Check -in Value Andrew March 2023 Great place! Have stayed there multiple times. Response from Rhonda March 2023 Always welcome back. Maribell January 2023 4.9 5.0 4.7 5.0 4.6 Enjoyed this cabin so much with our family. The location was perfect. Located in a quiet area, to get that cabin feel but close to the city and different adventures. The house was clean and cozy had everything we needed. Rhonda was a wonder hostess and was easy to communicate with. We will be back soon. Response from Rhonda January 2023 So happy to hear everyone had a great time at the cabin. Looking forward to hosting you again. Amanda December 2022 A perfect place to stay for Christmas! My family loved it and felt right at home! Response from Rhonda https://www.airbnb.corn/roorns/52242126/reviews?preview_for mhtrue&source_impression id=p3_1679942328 gTMoPL%2F3bbC)EPaz0 Aerial Map Larry and Ronda Conner 5859 Bent Mountain Rd. 096.01-04-19.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.32 acres Current Zoning: R-1 Proposes Zoning: R-1S Proposed SUP for Short - Term Rental Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ri®ANOKE Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 4/19/2023 1:1,128 G3.TAt TI�� Li:J.JG o l o Aar N © I - e`"4i-" o 91M0 ;.j�'j� O Jr ©jrcakla Zoning Map Larry and Ronda Conner 5859 Bent Mountain Rd. 096.01-04-19.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.32 acres Current Zoning: R-1 Proposes Zoning: R-1S Proposed SUP for Short - Term Rental Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Zoning AR R1 Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 ROANOKE ..C}XN,v VA 0 70 140 Date: 4/19/2023 Feet 280 1:2,257 Roanoke County,:Virginia 2019 FLU Map Larry and Ronda Conner 5859 Bent Mountain Rd. 096.01-04-19.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.32 acres Current Zoning: R-1 Proposes Zoning: R-1S Proposed SUP for Short - Term Rental Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Future Land Use Development Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. rioAsioKE Roanoke VA 24018 vq Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 4/ 19/2 023 1:2 , 25 7 ;918i` 1 7 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Parker Design Group, Inc. to obtain a special use permit for religious assembly on approximately 2.91 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located on Oakland Boulevard between 233 Hershberger Road and 4843 Oakland Boulevard, Hollins Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for June 27, 2023. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Parker Design Group, Inc. to obtain a special use permit for religious assembly on approximately 2.91 acres of land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located on Oakland Boulevard between 233 Hershberger Road and 4843 Oakland Boulevard, Hollins Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for June 27, 2023. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: u1t41Z3 Received by: --i--)c,rvi S Application fee: 1 6—l. • CD b PC/BZA date: 1 U 17,3 Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number I() - % 1 1.:3 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning I Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Parker Design Group, Inc. Jack Ellinwood, LA 2122 Carolina Avenue Roanoke, Virginina 24014 Phone: 540-387-1153 Cell #: 540-588-3311 Email: jellinwood@parkerdg.com Contact for Legal Ads Jack Ellinwood, LA Owner's name/address w/zip Chua Phat Son - Buddha Mountain Center C,Q. Pham Duc 5535 Florist Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Phone #: 540-999-5353 CeI1 #: 757-305-7498 Email: thichchucdo@gmail.com Property Location 0 Oakland Boulevard Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning area: Peters Creek Tax MapNo.: OS 4S-of- 038.15-01 -06.01 -000C+ Qret-0000 Existing Zoning: C2 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 2.63 Acres 4 OI ac‘ Existing Land Use: Vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C2S Proposed Land Use: Religious Assembly Does t e parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes V No C IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes VNo L IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes El • i VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) ���� Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zo ., Ordin;., . elkit drier t o 4 Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to toS41 gym Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Or. i ' I A r<+ : . 4 Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCENAUFAVerroF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SIW/CP V/AA Consultation Application Justification R/S/WICP V/AA WM Ell NIA R'S/W/CP VIAA 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan V Application fee Metes and bounds description NIA Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application V Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent fthe owner. c-Ve.it.c.v.49,$d' agent Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Parker Design Group, Inc. - Jack Ellinwood L.A. The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The subject tract of land has been vacant for 40 years (+\-). The purchase of property for development of a new Buddhist Temple, will provide for a needed civic use which will meet the needs of the growing Buddhist community in Roanoke and surrounding areas. This site will replace the existing temple location on Florist Road which has limited the expansion potential of facilities over the long-term. The development of this property as a temple meets the Religious Assembly, Article IV - Use and Design Standards found in the zoning ordinance. Although the property is zoned for commercial development, the unusual shape of the tract has likely resulted in the continuing vacancy. Lack of adequate space to accommodate higher intensity use types and associated supporting amenities including parking, vehicle maneuvering and building footprint are likely a few of the reasons. A new Buddhist Temple will provide an attractive and harmonious transition within the neighborhood. The development of the grounds will concentrate on integration of landscaping and manicured grounds conducive to the Buddhist belief of natural beauty inspiring meditative practices. The treatment of runoff will be handled on site in a natural manner that adds to the enhancement of wildlife habitat and groundwater recharge. The temple use will not create undue burdens on the existing transportation or utility infrastructure as there are no regimented service schedules as typical with other religious facilities. Members come and go on their own scheduled to reflect and mediate. There are two celebrations held during the year that the are organized for all members to attend. The grounds and facilities are also open to anyone seeking a quiet escape and community use is encouraged and welcomed. Temple members are also active through community service and to others in need. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Although the proposed use is within the C2 - High Intensity Commercial District, the allowance of the proposed Religious Assembly by SUP conforms to the Community Plan by allowing a long vacant and unused parcel of land to form a transitional buffer between adjacent commercial uses and medium density residential uses to the east and the Friendship Manor Apartment Village campus to the west. The existing adjacent commercial businesses are not used as high intensity commercial facilities and are typical of service type small businesses, including daycare, telecommunications warehousing \ office, and safety and compliance office space. The proposed Buddhist temple will fit into the surrounding community by offering nonindustrial architectural styles more compatible with the adjacent business facilities and surrounding residential uses. Overall, the proposed development of a Buddhist temple in a High Intensity Commercial District is consistent with the Roanoke County Community Plan's recognition of the need for flexibility in land use, its emphasis on economic development, and its commitment to protecting the environment. While a Buddhist temple may not generate as much tax revenue as a commercial development, it could provide intangible benefits to the community, such as promoting cultural diversity and providing a peaceful space for reflection and contemplation. For example, the Buddhist temple will attract visitors from outside the area, which will generate economic activity in the form of tourism and spending at local businesses. The proposed development of a Buddhist temple could help to meet the needs of the community and add to the cultural diversity of the area. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The request for Religious Assembly use at this location will not significantly impact public facilities as the temple use will be limited to the occasional gathering of temple members. Membership in the temple will be from the surrounding regional area and will likely not exceed 160 congregants. Traffic generation at the property will be very low compared to high intensity commercial or residential uses which will help limit impact to road infrastructure. This facility is very compatible with adjacent businesses and property uses and will use building materials more typically seen in residential areas. Water and sewer use will be low volume and will not tax existing infrastructures. The temple will not negatively impact emergency services as adequate access to the facility will developed and fire suppression designs will meet the requirements of the Fire marshal's office. The proposed development of a Buddhist temple could help to meet the needs of the community and add to the cultural diversity of the area. Pages 4 and 5 following were omitted from application -- not applicable 3 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum. ALL APPLICANTS V a. Applicant name and name of development V b. Date, scale and north arrow • c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. • f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements • h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights • i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site • 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals • n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants N\A p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Cigo-uArt9-ed'' April 10, 2023 Signatut`? of applicant Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. CHUA PHAT SON - BUDDHA MOUNTAIN TEMPLE Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature APRIL 10, 2023 Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 NTIO 280' LINE OF SIGHT I EXISTING WATER METER AND 2" WATER LINE SERVING ADJOINER NEW DOMESTIC WATER AND METER OWNER FITZGERALD FAMILY INVESTMENTS INC ZONING C2 250' LINE OF SIGHT TO NT'X. HERSHBERGER ROAD BLDG PHASE TWO BLDG FF -,oz s l OWNTX:ITAT11:45griA NC ZONING: II PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION 0.9 ACRES (.) GUEST HOUSE EXISTING TREE COVER TO REMAIN F1 NEW 6 SANITARY LAI tRAL EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURNAROUND EXISTING MANHOLE 04C-0033.0 WITH 30" CONNECTING SANITARY SEWER LINE ' I EXISTING MANHOLE 04C-1396.0 WITH B" SANITARY SEWER LINE su+-- SAN SAN T SAN - NAN - NAN - NAN - NAN SAN SAN STORAGE SHECG \ IJ� PLACE AT EDGE �, ■ OF DRIVE ON EXISTING TREE COVER ADJACENT PRPERTV PROPOSED RETAINING WALL AHHHOXIMATE LENGTH =180' MAX. HEIGHT =4' PROPOSED STONE STATUE 18' TALL ()SWAN YIN) PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION 1.3 ACRES (-A) OWNER FRIENDSHIP PROPERTIES INC ZONING C2 ZONING C2 LEXISTING 30" SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING MANHOLE 04C-0032.0 'EXISTING MANHOLE 04C-0030.0 GRAPHIC SCALE D DELI OWNER EDINBURGH SO FOUNDATION ZONING R3 2122 Card,. Ave. SW Roanoke. VA 29014 mone.vnx3220 804-358-2.7 REVISIONS JOE JOE & IBM JOE 22-0335 XEET TITLE CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT C01 01 OF 01 CHLA PFLAT SON TEMPLE . Y::'NY..ffin RrR�R'NIZN'd'lIR'�II:.'YB" IN NINI'ZIW'Z'll.'YII.'IYI.WM-4 -111 —` n I"" "'" "I`I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII L�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII " I I _ EXTERIOR ELEVATION = l,_D„ EIFS ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES, MATCH EXIST EXIST WORSHIP HALL PVC COLUMNS AND DECORATIVE TRIM BRICK VENEER PAINTED WD RAILING APPROX FIN GRADE NRTYRTYP,nNAYIWRNYRNYRN11MU RTNYTYYTYAP'NY'IWR'IWRNYTYRT'YRTYRTNAPIIYYNYREIIHNRTYRTYRT'YRTYAYNAYIIR4IWRd To ami'r T 7'"sam°�'fJr 7 7 "��'7iMW! 7 7 7'" 'fir 7 7" 1111111IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIijIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII1IIII IIIIIII�!""I" EXTERIOR ELEVATION I/8" = I'-0" ;4105 i'4"'�'Y " takomunnou I `ii11110111111 nnungllnnll Ilningllnnll Illlllllljlllllllllll00i:!1IIIIIIIIII ,yFtNC —III, I111IIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIII EIFG ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES, MATCH EXIST PVC COLUMNS AND DECORATIVE TRIM BRICK VENEER WOOD STAIRS APPROX FIN GRADE PAINTED WD RAILING EXIST WORSHIP HALL PROGRESS PRll T 09-04-23 NNNN CHUA PHAT SON - BUDDHA MOUNTAIN CENTER ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HERSHBERGER RD AND OAKLAND BLVD EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LEMOLE ARCHITECTS A-2.1 PHIOTOGRAPH OF KWAN YIN STATUTE TO BE RELOCATED FROM FLORIST ROAD TEMPLE TO NEW SITE. STATUE HEIGHT IS APPROXIMATELY 18 FEET. KITCHEN 241 x401 TENT OR PRO 401 x801 STORAGE SHED 101x151 TYP OF 3 GRAPHVC SCALES 1 /16 -0 0 4' 8' 16' 32' 4B' =1 PROGRESS PRINT 04-04-23 NNNi CHUA PHAT SON - BUDDHA MOUNTAIN CENTER ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HERSHBERGER RD AND OAKLAND BLVD ARCHITECTURAL PLAN LEMOLE ARCHITECTS A-1.1 Aerial Map Parker Design Group 0 Oakland Boulevard Tax map numbers: 038.15-01-06.01-0000 and 038.15-01-07.01-0000 Size: 2.91 Acres Magisterial District: Hollins Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Religious Assembly Subject Sites Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 4/ 18/2 023 1:2 , 25 7 ©avo i2200 R3©,]thd ©' Ike o r ©a111uiha1 e Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Flood Map Parker Design Group 0 Oakland Boulevard Tax map numbers: 038.15-01-06.01-0000 and 038.15-01-07.01-0000 Size: 2.91 Acres Magisterial District: Hollins Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Religious Assembly Subject Sites Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 0 70 140 ROANOKE Feet 280 Date: 4/ 18/2 023 1:2 , 25 7 Rl°JC'dhec�.U�.6 caji ilia L5 "IXLo INV.:VIIIIJIn`Aq ©:JI e o `T4i-101 o Jr ©jr`attlIGq Zoning Map Parker Design Group 0 Oakland Boulevard Tax map numbers: 038.15-01-06.01-0000 and 038.15-01-07.01-0000 Size: 2.91 Acres Magisterial District: Hollins Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Religious Assembly Subject Sites Zoning C2 11 R1 R3 Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ROANOKE Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 4/ 18/2 023 1:2 , 25 7 HERSHBERGER RD 1,0 HE Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Future Land Use Map Parker Design Group 0 Oakland Boulevard Tax map numbers: 038.15-01-06.01-0000 and 038.15-01-07.01-0000 Size: 2.91 Acres Magisterial District: Hollins Current Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S SUP: Religious Assembly Subject Sites Future Land Use Neighborhood Conservation Transition Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 4/ 18/2 023 1:2 , 25 7 HERSHBERGER RD 743 HE ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution approving the First Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Agreement SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution approving the First Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Agreement. Page 1 of 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT This First Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Contract is made this 23rd day of May 2023. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board") and Richard L. Caywood ("Mr. Caywood" or the "County Administrator") entered into an employment agreement on December 14, 2021. It is the desire of the Board and Mr. Caywood to amend this agreement in order to compensate Mr. Caywood in an amount commensurate with the salaries of County Administrators in comparable localities throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Accordingly, it is hereby agreed that the December 14, 2021 agreement is amended; Mr. Caywood's current salary, as of May 22, 2023, shall be increased by the amount of $12,927, annually. All other provisions of the December 14, 2021 agreement shall remain in effect. This amendment shall be effective immediately. Attest: Chief Deputy Clerk BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By Chairman Richard L. Caywood AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors and Richard L. Caywood entered into an employment agreement on December 14, 2021; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board and Mr. Caywood to amend the agreement dated December 14, 2021 in order to compensate Mr. Caywood in an amount commensurate with the salaries of County Administrators in comparable localities throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. The proposed First Amendment to the County Administrator's Employment Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, which is hereby attached to this Resolution, is approved; the Chairman is authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the Board. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution approving the First Amendment to the County Attorney's employment agreement SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: First Amendment to the County Attorney's employment agreement. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors and Peter S. Lubeck entered into an employment agreement on January 14, 2020, and subsequently entered into a second, revised agreement on June 8, 2021, which replaced the prior agreement; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board and Mr. Lubeck to amend the agreement dated June 8, 2021 in order to compensate Mr. Lubeck in an amount commensurate with the salaries of County Attorneys in comparable localities throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. The proposed First Amendment to the County Attorney's Employment Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, which is hereby attached to this Resolution, is approved; the Chairman is authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the Board. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Page 1 of 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT This First Amendment to the County Attorney's Employment Contract is made this 23'd day of May 2023. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board") and Peter S. Lubeck ("Mr. Lubeck" or the "County Attorney") entered into an employment agreement on January 14, 2020, and subsequently entered into a second, revised agreement on June 8, 2021, which replaced the prior agreement. It is the desire of the Board and Mr. Lubeck to amend the agreement dated June 8, 2021 in order to compensate Mr. Lubeck in an amount commensurate with the salaries of County Attorneys in comparable localities throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Accordingly, it is hereby agreed that the June 8, 2021 agreement is amended; Mr. Lubeck's current salary, as of May 22, 2023, shall be increased by the amount of $13,271, annually. All other provisions of the June 8, 2021 contract shall remain in effect. This amendment shall be effective immediately. Attest: Chief Deputy Clerk BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By Chairman Peter S. Lubeck ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) (District); Community Policy & Management Team (CPMT); Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (TPO); Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission; Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee; Virginia Western Community College Board; Western Virginia Water Authority SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointments. BACKGROUND: Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) (District): Supervisor Martha Hooker has recommended the reappointment of Richard L. Jones, Jr. to represent the Catawba Magisterial District for an additional five-year term to expire June 30, 2028. Community Policy & Management Team (CPMT): In accordance with the Bylaws of the CPMT, a representative of a private organization or association of providers of children or family services, or its designee shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors for a three-year term. Renee Brown (Primary) and Trista Thompson (Alternate), with DePaul Community Page 1 of 3 Resources, terms will expire June 30, 2023. Staff has recommended the reappointment of both to an additional term of three (3) years to expire June 30, 2026. The Bylaws of the CPMT requires that all designees shall be ratified by the Board of Supervisors. Staff has appointed the following and must be ratified by the Board. There are no term limits: Community Services Board: Leigh Frazier, Mark Chadwick, Sarah Watkins, Howard Shumate, Courtney Alleyne and Chris Park (alternates) Court Services Unit: Kevin Meeks (Primary); Jasmin Lawson and Joshua Vaught (alternates) Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization (TPO): Phil C. North and David F. Radford's appointments will expire June 30, 2020. The Board has recommended both be reappointed to a three-year term, which will expire June 30, 2026. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission: Phil C. North, David F. Radford and Richard Caywood's (alternate) appointments will expire June 30, 2023. The Board has recommended both be reappointed to a three- year term, which will expire June 30, 2026. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee: Paul M. Mahoney's appointment will expire June 30, 2023. The Board has recommended that Paul M. Mahoney be reappointed to a three-year term, which will expire June 30, 2026. Virginia Western Community College Board: Penny Hodge's appointment will expire June 30, 2023. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Ms. Hodge to a four-year term to expire June 30, 2027 Dr. Ken Nicely's four-year term will expire June 30, 2023. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Dr. Nicely to an additional four-year term to expire June 30, 2026. Western Virginia Water Authority: Richard L. Caywood's four-year term will expire June 30, 2023. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Mr. Caywood to an additional four-year term, which will expire Page 2 of 3 June 30, 2027. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of all referenced appointments. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution accepting a donation of a recycling trailer from Cox Communications for additional capacity at Fallowater Lane SUBMITTED BY: Ashley King Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution to accept donation of a recycle trailer from Cox Communications. BACKGROUND: In 2005, Roanoke County initiated a mobile drop-off recycling program through a cooperative agreement with Hollins University. Roanoke County citizens' participation in the mobile drop-off program has grown since its inception to include trailers at the Brambleton Center, Cox Communications, William Byrd Middle School and Glenvar Middle School. The expanded recycling program was due in part to the provision of a drop-off location and donation of trailers to the County by Cox Communications as a part of their Cox Conserves environmental program. This program prioritizes positive environmental change both within their company and the communities they serve. Cox Communications has corporately invested over one hundred million dollars in sustainability and conservation projects, to include initiatives related to emissions, water conservation and landfill impacts. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: Cox Communications continues their partnership and investment in recycling by providing use of their property on Fallowater Lane as a drop-off location for all County citizens. We currently have three trailers there, and Cox Communications would like to donate another trailer to handle the heavy flow of traffic at this site. The price of the new trailer is $21,220. Solid Waste employees will continue to be responsible for hauling the recyclable materials to the processor and maintenance of the trailer and site. The trailer matches the specification requirements of the County. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the donated trailer reduces capital investment by the County for a trailer that would be necessary in order to continue providing comparable recycling drop-off opportunities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donated recycling trailer from Cox Communications. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF A RECYCLING TRAILER FROM COX COMMUNICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL CAPACITY AT FALLOWATER LANE WHEREAS, in 2005, Roanoke County initiated a mobile drop-off recycling program which has grown since its inception to include trailers at the Brambleton Center, Cox Communications, William Byrd Middle School and Glenvar Middle School; and WHEREAS, the expanded recycling program was due in part to the provision of a drop-off location and donation of trailers to the County by Cox Communications as a part of their Cox Conserves environmental program —Cox Communications has corporately invested over one hundred million dollars in sustainability and conservation projects, to include initiatives related to emissions, water conservation and landfill impacts; and WHEREAS, Cox Communications continues their partnership and investment in recycling by providing use of their property on Fallowater Lane as a drop-off location for all County citizens, where the County currently has three trailers; and WHEREAS, Cox Communications would like to donate another trailer to handle the heavy flow of traffic at this site. The price of the new trailer is $21,220 and matches the specification requirements of the County; and WHEREAS, Solid Waste employees will continue to be responsible for hauling the recyclable materials to the processor and maintenance of the trailer and site. Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. The Board hereby accepts the donation of the recycling trailer. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.10 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution requesting that the U.S. Department of Transportation fund a Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant to install Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure at Explore Park, Vinton Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Megan G. Cronise Assistant Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: A resolution of support is requested from the Board of Supervisors to apply for a Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant through the U.S. Department of Transportation to install Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in Explore Park. BACKGROUND: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has made available $700 million in funding through the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant (CFI) Program in two (2) separate grant categories: 1) Up to $350 million for the Community Charging and Fueling Program Grants (Community Program); and 2) Up to $350 million for the Alternative Fuel Corridor Grants (Corridor Program). This Program is intended to strategically deploy electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, hydrogen, propane and natural gas fueling infrastructure located on public roads or in other publicly accessible locations. Facilities must be accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. The CFI Program provides eighty percent (80%) federal funding for a twenty percent (20%) local match. The application is due June 13, 2023. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: Staff recommends applying through the Community Program for EV charging infrastructure at Explore Park to include four (4) charging ports capable of charging simultaneously at a minimum of 150 kilowatts each (Direct Current Fast Charger, DCFC) for 600 kilowatts total, a contactless payment method, four parking spaces and one freestanding parking lot light fixture. One parking space will meet ADA requirements for accessibility. Supporting infrastructure at Explore Park includes: Three-phase power; Fiber connectivity; Restrooms at the Blue Ridge Parkway Visitor Center; Twin Creeks Brew Pub at Brugh Tavern; and Security cameras. Once installed and functional, charging facilities must be operational for a minimum of five years. Regular reporting requirements are part of this funding opportunity. In addition to electricity, recurring costs are anticipated to include maintenance and network services. The fee charged to users will be calculated to recover these costs. FISCAL IMPACT: The twenty percent (20%) match not to exceed $200,000 will be submitted as a fiscal year 2025 Capital Improvement Program request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution of support. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FUND A CHARGING AND FUELING INFRASTRUCTURE DISCRETIONARY GRANT TO INSTALL ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AT EXPLORE PARK, VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is committed to advocating for and improving transportation infrastructure in both the County and in the region; and WHEREAS, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funded the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Discretionary Grant Opportunity to strategically deploy charging and alternative fueling infrastructure to accelerate an electrified and alternative fuel transportation system that is convenient, affordable, reliable, equitable, accessible and safe; and WHEREAS, locating electric vehicle charging stations at Explore Park meets the requirements of the CFI Community Program; and WHEREAS, installing electric vehicle charging stations at Explore Park will provide a needed charging station along the Blue Ridge Parkway and in the rural area of Roanoke County that will also be beneficial for visitors to Explore Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requests the U.S. Department of Transportation fund a CFI Discretionary Grant through the Community Program to locate electric vehicle charging stations at Explore Park. Page 1 of 2 2. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby commits to provide a twenty percent (20%) matching contribution for a CFI Discretionary Grant, up to and not to exceed $200,000. 3. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby grants authority for the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator of Assistant County Administrator to execute project agreements for an approved CFI Discretionary Grant. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.11 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve fiscal agent agreement for the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection (RCACP) SUBMITTED BY: Jessica Beemer Assistant Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke has served as the fiscal agent for the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection (RCACP) since December 2012. DISCUSSION: The current agreement expires on June 30, 2023, and is recommended for renewal through June 30, 2026. Fiscal agent responsibilities include Accounting, Accounts Payable, Payroll and Purchasing and are outlined on the attached agreement. The RCACP approved this agreement during their budget process. FISCAL IMPACT: The RCACP will pay the County of Roanoke $63,141.00, $65,035.20 and $66,986.16 for fiscal years ending June 30, 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively to provide fiscal agent services. The annual revenue received for providing this service was included as a recovered cost in the County General Government Budget. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached fiscal agent agreement with the Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection, in substantially the format submitted, and authorizing the County Administrator to sign the agreement. Page 2 of 2 Fiscal Agent Agreement Between The County of Roanoke, And The Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection This agreement is made the 23rd day of May, 2023, by and between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ("County"), a political subdivision and county of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and The Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection, an intergovernmental agreement between the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, and Botetourt County. RECITALS 1. The Regional Center for Animal Care and Protection (Regional Animal Shelter) was created by an intergovernmental agreement dated December 11, 2012 between the charter members of the City of Roanoke, County of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, and Botetourt County pursuant to code section 3.2-6546 of the Code of Virginia which requires the governing body of each county or city to maintain or cause to be maintained a public animal shelter and allows one or more local governing bodies to operate a single "animal shelter" in conjunction with one another. 2. Section 3.2 of the intergovernmental agreement designates the County of Roanoke to be the fiscal agent until otherwise agreed to by a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors, and the fiscal agent is required to maintain a program account for the receipt of funds paid by the Participating Localities and fees paid by the general public, and for payment expenses for the operation, maintenance, repairs, and capital improvements to the Regional Animal Shelter. AGREEMENT The County is hereby authorized to serve as Fiscal Agent for the Regional Animal Shelter as set forth herein. As such, the Regional Animal Shelter and the County agree to the provisions outlined below: 1. Maintenance of Books. The County will establish a separate fund(s) on the County financial system to maintain the financial records of the Regional Animal Shelter. 2. Pooled Cash. As part of the overall pooled cash concept that is used by the County, the cash of the Regional Animal Shelter will be accounted for separately but may be pooled with the cash of the County and other agencies that the County serves as fiscal agent. As such, the Treasurer of the County is authorized to make investments for the pooled cash in accordance with applicable law, including, without limitation, the Investment of Public Funds Act, 2.2-4500 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, 1 and the Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, 2.2-4400 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. Negative Cash. As a participant in the pooled cash concept of the County, the Regional Animal Shelter may have a negative cash balance from time to time. The Regional Animal Shelter agrees to minimize the negative cash to the extent possible. The cash balance must be positive at the end of the fiscal year. 4. Interest Income. At the end of each month, the County allocates interest income earned during that month to all of the funds based upon the percentage participation on the pooled cash. If the net interest income is negative at the end of a month, then negative interest will be allocated to the fund. 5. Loss on Investments. In the unlikely event that the County pooled cash has a loss on an investment through default, market decline, or other reason except for negligence, theft, or legal violations by the County and/or its agents, the Regional Animal Shelter will share in the loss using the methodology described in paragraph 4. 6. Revenues. All revenues of the Regional Animal Shelter will be deposited with the County Treasurer. 7. Payment of Vendors. The County will make vendor payments for the Regional Animal Shelter. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures. These payments will be combined into the normal County vendor payment process, and as such the check stock used will be the County of Roanoke, and will be signed electronically with the signatures that appear on County checks. Reference to the Regional Animal Shelter may be made on the description line of the check. 8. Payment of Payroll. The County will process the payroll for the Regional Animal Shelter. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures and follow the County payroll cycle. 9. Processing of Payroll Taxes. The County will file all payroll taxes for the Regional Animal Shelter. 10. Procurement. The County is available for consulting on Procurement activities as requested by the Regional Animal Shelter. 11. Risk Management. The County is available for consulting on insurance coverage as requested by the Regional Animal Shelter. The Regional Animal Shelter will be charged directly for the costs associated with worker's compensation, insurance for property and equipment, and the cost of health insurance not covered by premiums. 12. Financial Reports. The County will work with the Regional Animal Shelter staff and Board of Directors to provide meaningful financial reports, as needed, for the Regional Animal Shelter on a mutually convenient schedule. This will include monthly 2 and annual financial reports prepared for the Regional Animal Shelter's scheduled Board meetings. 13. Systems. The County will provide access to the County's Financial System. 14. Audit. The County will assemble a review team that will include staff of the Regional Animal Shelter and the County. This team will procure an audit firm to conduct the Regional Animal Shelter's annual audit. The County will work with the auditors selected to prepare the audit of the Regional Animal Shelter. The Regional Animal Shelter will maintain overall responsibility for the integrity of the Regional Animal Shelter's financial records that are provided to the County and the auditor. The Regional Animal Shelter will be charged for the cost of the audit. 15. Errors and Omissions. It is the responsibility of the Regional Animal Shelter to ensure that all of the Regional Animal Shelter's financial information which shall be provided to the County and\or any audit firm procured by the County on behalf of the Regional Animal Shelter is correct, accurate, and complete. 16. Ownership. All funds and obligations of the Regional Animal Shelter are the property of the Regional Animal Shelter. Upon termination of this Agreement, all funds and obligations will be remitted to the Regional Animal Shelter, or its new fiscal agent. 17. Cost. The fiscal agent services outlined above will be provided to the Regional Animal Shelter for a fee of $5,261.75 a month ($63,141.00 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, a fee of $5,419.60 a month ($65,035.20 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, and a fee of $5,582.18 a month ($66,986.16annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The County has permission to transfer funds from the Regional Animal Shelter funds to the County funds by journal entry to pay for this service. 18. Term. This agreement shall begin on July 1, 2023 and shall terminate on June 30, 2026. Further, either the County or the Regional Animal Shelter may terminate at any time with one year written notice to the other. 3 In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Fiscal Agent Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY By: Its: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Its: COUNTY ATTORNEY REGIONAL CENTER FOR ANIMAL CARE AND PROTECTION By: Its: DIRECTOR Approved as to form: By: Its: GENERAL COUNSEL 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.12 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUBMITTED BY: Jessica Beemer Assistant Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke has served as the fiscal agent for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) since 1992. DISCUSSION: The current agreement expires on June 30, 2023, and is recommended for renewal through June 30, 2026. Fiscal agent responsibilities include Accounting, Accounts Payable and Payroll and are outlined on the attached agreement. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Board approved this agreement during the budget process. FISCAL IMPACT: RVRA will pay the County of Roanoke $61,182.00, $63,017.40 and $64,908.00 for fiscal years ending June 30, 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively to provide fiscal agent services. The annual revenue received for providing this service is included as a recovered cost in the County General Government Budget. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached fiscal agent agreement with the Roanoke Valley Resources Authority, in substantially the format submitted, and authorizing the County Administrator to sign the agreement. Page 2 of 2 Fiscal Agent Agreement Between The County of Roanoke, And The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority This agreement is made the 23rd day of May 2023, by and between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ("County"), a political subdivision and county of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority ("Authority"), a tax exempt public body of the Commonwealth of Virginia. RECITALS 1. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority was created by an agreement dated October 23, 1991 between the charter members of the City of Roanoke, County of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton pursuant to the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act as predecessor to the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, ("Act"). 2. Section 15.2-5114 (11) of the Act authorizes the Authority to enter into contracts and the Authority adopted By -Laws effective February 4, 1992, Article III, Section 8 of which authorizes the Authority to contract with a participating political subdivision for services to produce warrants or checks for expenditures of the Authority. AGREEMENT The County is hereby authorized to serve as Fiscal Agent for the Authority as set forth herein. As such, the Authority and the County agree to the provisions outlined below: 1. Maintenance of Books. The County will establish a separate fund(s) on the County financial system to maintain the financial records of the Authority. 2. Pooled Cash. As part of the overall pooled cash concept that is used by the County, the cash of the Authority will be accounted for separately but may be pooled with the cash of the County and other agencies that the County serves as fiscal agent. As such, the Treasurer of the County is authorized to make investments for the pooled cash in accordance with applicable law, including, without limitation, the Investment of Public Funds Act, 2.2-4500 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and the Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, 2.2-4400 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. Negative Cash. As a participant in the pooled cash concept of the County, the Authority may have a negative cash balance from time to time. The Authority agrees to Page 1 of 4 minimize the negative cash to the extent possible. The cash balance must be positive at the end of the fiscal year. 4. Interest Income. At the end of each month, the County allocates interest income earned during that month to all of the funds based upon the percentage participation on the pooled cash. If the net interest income is negative at the end of a month, then negative interest will be allocated to the fund. 5. Loss on Investments. In the unlikely event that the County pooled cash has a loss on an investment through default, market decline, or other reason except for negligence, theft, or legal violations by the County and/or its agents, the Authority will share in the loss using the methodology described in paragraph 4. 6. Revenues. All revenues of the Authority will be deposited with the County Treasurer except as required by Authority's Revenue Bond Master Indenture and related documents and applicable law. 7. Payment of Vendors. The County will make vendor payments for the Authority. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures. These payments will be combined into the normal County vendor payment process, and as such the check stock used will be the County of Roanoke, and will be signed electronically with the signatures that appear on County checks. Reference to the Authority may be made on the description line of the check. 8. Payment of Payroll. The County will process the payroll for the Authority. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures and follow the County payroll cycle. 9. Processing of Payroll Taxes. The County will file all payroll taxes for the Authority. 10. Procurement. The County is available for consulting on Procurement activities as requested by the Authority. 11. Risk Management. The County is available for consulting on insurance coverage as requested by the Authority. 12. Financial Reports. The County will work with the Authority staff and Board to provide meaningful financial reports, as needed, for the Authority on a mutually convenient schedule. This will include monthly and annual financial reports prepared for the Authority's scheduled Board meetings. 13. Systems. The County will provide access to the County's Financial System. Page 2 of 4 14. Audit. The County will assemble a review team that will include staff of the Authority and the County. This team will procure an audit firm to conduct the Authority's annual audit. The County will work with the auditors selected to prepare the audit of the Authority. The Authority will maintain overall responsibility for the integrity of the Authority's financial records that are provided to the County and the auditor. The Authority will be charged for the cost of the audit. 15. Errors and Omissions. It is the responsibility of the Authority to ensure that all of the Authority's financial information which shall be provided to the County and\or any audit firm procured by the County on behalf of the Authority is correct, accurate, and complete. 16. Ownership. All funds and obligations of the Authority are the property of the Authority. Upon termination of this Agreement, all funds and obligations will be remitted to the Authority, or its new fiscal agent. 17. Cost. The fiscal agent services outlined above will be provided to the Authority for a fee of $5,098.50 a month ($61,182.00 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, a fee of $5,251.45 a month ($63,017.40 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, and a fee of $5,409.00 a month ($64,908.00 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The County has permission to transfer funds from the Authority funds to the County funds by journal entry each month to pay for this service. 18. Term. This agreement shall begin on July 1, 2023 and shall terminate on June 30, 2026. Further, either the County or the Authority may terminate the Agreement at any time with one year written notice to the other. In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Fiscal Agent Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers. Page 3 of 4 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Its: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Its: COUNTY ATTORNEY ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY By: Its: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Approved as to form: By: Its: GENERAL COUNSEL Page 4 of 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.13 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority SUBMITTED BY: Jessica Beemer Assistant Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approve a fiscal agent agreement with the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke has served as the fiscal agent for the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority (WVRJA) since 2005. DISCUSSION: The current agreement expires on June 30, 2023, and is recommended for renewal through June 30, 2026. Fiscal agent responsibilities include Accounting, Accounts Payable, Payroll and Purchasing and are outlined on the attached agreement. The Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority approved this agreement during their budget process. FISCAL IMPACT: The WVRJA will pay the County of Roanoke $134,400, $138,432 and $142,584 for fiscal years ending June 30, 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively to provide fiscal agent services. The annual revenue received for providing this service is included as a recovered cost in the County General Government Budget. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached fiscal agent agreement with the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority, in substantially the format submitted, and authorizing the County Administrator to sign the agreement. Page 2 of 2 Fiscal Agent Agreement Between The County of Roanoke, And The Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority This agreement is made the _th day of month, 2023, by and between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ("County"), a political subdivision and county of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and The Western Virginia Jail Authority ("Authority"), a regional jail authority, created pursuant to Section 53.1-95.2 of the Code of Virginia. RECITALS 1. The Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority was created by an agreement dated June 24, 2005 between the County of Franklin, Virginia; the County of Montgomery, Virginia; the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the City of Salem, Virginia. The Authority has all the powers granted a jail authority by law and by the provisions of Articles 3, 3.1, Title 53.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 2. The Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority adopted By -Laws effective August 4, 2005. Article VII, Section 2 of these By -Laws allows the Authority to designate a fiscal agent and enter into a contract with such agent for this purpose. AGREEMENT The County is hereby authorized to serve as Fiscal Agent for The Authority. As such, The Authority and the County agree to the provisions outlined below: 1. Maintenance of Books. The County will establish a separate fund(s) on the County financial system to maintain the financial records of the Authority. 2. Pooled Cash. As part of the overall pooled cash concept that is used by the County, the cash of the Authority will be pooled with the cash of the County and other agencies that the County serves as fiscal agent. As such, the Treasurer of the County is authorized to make investments for the pooled cash. 3. Negative Cash. As a participant in the pooled cash concept of the County, the Authority may have a negative cash balance from time to time. The Authority agrees to Page 1 of 4 minimize the negative cash to the extent possible. The cash balance must be positive at the end of the fiscal year. 4. Interest Income. At the end of each month, the County allocates interest income earned during that month to all of the funds based upon the percentage participation on the pooled cash. If cash is negative at the end of a month, as described in paragraph 3, then negative interest will be allocated to the fund. 5. Loss on Investments. In the unlikely event that the County pooled cash has a loss on an investment through default, market decline, or other reason, the Authority will share in the loss using the methodology described in paragraph 4. 6. Revenues. All revenues of the Authority, except for inmate funds, will be deposited with the County Treasurer. 7. Payment of Vendors. The County will make vendor payments for the Authority. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures. These payments will be combined into the normal County vendor payment process, and as such the check stock used will be the County of Roanoke, and will be signed electronically with the signatures that appear on County checks. Reference to the Authority may be made on the description line of the check. 8. Payment of Payroll. The County will process the payroll for the Authority. These payments will be made in a manner consistent with County procedures, follow the County payroll cycle, and be a separate payroll process. 9. Processing of Payroll Taxes. The County will file all payroll taxes for the Authority. 10. Procurement. The County will assist the Authority with Procurement activities as requested by the Authority. 11. Risk Management. The County is available for consulting on insurance coverage as requested by the Authority. 12. Financial Reports. The County will work with the Authority staff and Board to provide meaningful financial reports on a convenient schedule. This will include financial reports to the Authority Board meeting. 13. Systems. The County will provide the access of the County's Financial System and Human Resource/Payroll System. 14. Audit. The County will procure an audit firm for the Authority audit as part of the overall procurement process for the County audit. The firm selected may or may Page 2 of 4 not be the same firm that is selected to do the County audit. The County will work with the auditors selected to prepare the audit of the Authority. The Authority will maintain overall responsibility for the integrity of the financial records. The Authority will be charged for the cost of the audit. 15. Errors and Omissions. It is the responsibility of the Authority to make sure that all financial information is correct, accurate, and complete. 16. Ownership. All funds and obligations of the Authority are the property and responsibility of the Authority. Upon termination of this Agreement, all funds and obligations will be remitted to the Authority, or its new fiscal agent. 17. Cost. The fiscal agent services outlined above will be provided the Authority for a fee of $11,200.00 a month ($134,400 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, a fee of $11,536.00 a month ($138,432 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, and a fee of $11,882.00 a month ($142,584 annually) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The County has permission to transfer funds from the Authority funds to the County funds by journal entry each month to pay for this service. 18. Term. This agreement shall begin on July 1, 2023 and shall terminate on June 30, 2026. Further, either the County or the Authority may terminate the Agreement at any time with one year written notice to the other. Page 3 of 4 In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Fiscal Agent Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY By: Its: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Its: COUNTY ATTORNEY WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY By: Its: SUPERINTENDENT By: Its: LEGAL COUNSEL Page 4 of 4 County of Roanoke Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Fiscal Year 2022-2023 General Government Capital Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves $ 24,124,662 $ - $ 502,597 $ 7,923,936 :lose out of completed projects 35,604 (Ordinance 051022-4) 2,093,025 50,000 43,605 is - December 13, 2022 7,547,689 bulances and fire arms(Ordinance 02283-4) 216,832 Ordinance 051022-5) (3,225,059) res at Read Mountain Preserve (Ordinance 101122-1) (75,000) ire arms (Ordinance 022823-4) (613,339) $ 26,217,687 12.0% $ 50,000 $ 546,202 $ 11,810,663 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: VPSA School Bonds Lease Revenue Bonds Subtotal Premiums Audited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2022 Additions Deletions May 23, 2023 $ 85,873,052 $ $ 8,043,501 $ 77,829,551 73,900,000 12,660,000 3,800,000 82,760,000 159,773,052 12,384,805 12,660,000 812,376 11,843,501 160,589,551 13,197,181 $ 172,157,857 $ 13,472,376 $ 11,843,501 $ 173,786,732 Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Approved By Richard L. Caywood County Administrator Real Estate Taxes Personal Property Taxes Public Service Corp Base Penalties & Interest on Property Taxes Payment In Lieu Of Taxes Total General Property Taxes COUNTY OF ROANOKE Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues General Fund - C100 For the Ten Months Ending Sunday, April 30, 2023 Prior Year Current Year Revenues Revenues Budget Revenues %® of Budget Budget Revenues %® of Budget A $102,084,564 $52,600,487 51.53% $112,535,000 $56,002,817 49.76% $ 33,500,000 2,721,805 8.12% 40,812,500 3,252,650 7.97% 3,710,928 3,858,439 103.98% 4,040,928 3,926,815 97.18% 529,072 723,097 136.67% 529,072 699,265 132.17% 180,000 92,291 51.27% 180,000 183,992 102.22% 140,004,564 59,996,120 42.85% 158,097,500 64,065,538 40.52% Communication Taxes 2,900,000 2,106,797 72.65% 2,650,000 2,067,341 78.01% Local Sales Tax 12,200,000 10,459,410 85.73% 14,967,641 11,308,315 75.55% Consumer Utility Tax 3,650,000 2,845,336 77.95% 3,750,000 2,856,666 76.18% Business License Tax 6,364,000 7,354,508 115.56% 7,575,000 7,812,503 103.14% Franchise Tax 660,000 9,365 1.42% 700,000 47,595 6.80% Motor Vehicle License Fees 2,400,000 489,584 20.40% 2,400,000 556,864 23.20% Taxes On Recordation & Wills 1,400,000 1,262,112 90.15% 1,800,000 897,171 49.84% Utility License Tax 725,000 387,694 53.48% 600,000 461,346 76.89% Hotel & Motel Room Taxes 807,597 1,178,129 145.88% 1,349,568 1,277,136 94.63% Taxes - Prepared Foods 4,270,750 3,839,601 89.90% 5,400,000 4,365,894 80.85% Other Taxes 275,000 524,437 190.70% 1,175,000 990,611 84.31% Total Other Local Taxes 35,652,347 30,456,974 85.43% 42,367,209 32,641,443 77.04% Animal Control Fees 42,500 40,620 95.58% 42,500 41,861 98.50% Land and Building Fees 15,850 75,634 477.18% 15,850 9,055 57.13% Permits 549,840 524,633 95.42% 924,107 477,050 51.62% Prior Year Current Year Revenues Revenues Budget Revenues % of Budget Budget Revenues % of Budget A Fees 64,600 66,540 103.00% 64,600 86,999 134.67% Clerk of Court Fees 127,000 113,707 89.53% 127,000 110,837 87.27% Photocopy Charges 210 0 0.00% 210 0 0.00% Total Permits, Fees and Licenses 800,000 821,134 102.64% 1,174,267 725,802 61.81% Fines and Forfeitures 353,500 367,903 104.07% 400,000 336,167 84.04% Total Fines and Forfeitures 353,500 367,903 104.07% 400,000 336,167 84.04% Revenues from Use of Money 125,000 26,626 21.30% 90,897 476,121 523.80% Revenues From Use of Property 178,200 160,227 89.91 % 178,200 152,684 85.68% Total Use of Money and Property 303,200 186,853 61.63% 269,097 628,805 233.67% Charges for Services 3,773,400 2,862,104 75.85% 3,790,100 2,660,878 70.21% Charges for Public Services 70,000 200 0.29% 70,000 (120) -0.17% Education Aid -State 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Total Charges for Services 3,843,400 2,862,304 74.47% 3,860,100 2,660,758 68.93% Reimb-Shared Programs Salem 771,464 535,600 69.43% 996,464 695,271 69.77% Miscellaneous Revenue 317,302 292,994 92.34% 314,836 350,342 111.28% Recovered Costs 875,000 431,995 49.37% 800,129 519,739 64.96% Total Miscellaneous 1,963,766 1,260,590 64.19% 2,111,429 1,565,352 74.14% Non -Categorical Aid 402,000 1,045,614 260.10% 402,000 1,045,562 260.09% Shared Expenses 5,523,431 4,377,270 79.25% 5,772,874 4,621,435 80.05% Prior Year Current Year Revenues Revenues Budget Revenues % of Budget Budget Revenues % of Budget A Welfare & Social Services -Categorical 4,448,865 2,923,357 65.71% 4,000,727 2,892,509 72.30% Other State Categorical Aid 2,320,569 1,680,477 72.42% 2,468,805 1,853,934 75.09% Welfare & Social Services 5,495,953 4,342,099 79.01% 6,250,000 4,533,166 72.53% Education Aid -Federal 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Other Categorical Aid 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Total State and Federal Revenue 18,190,818 14,368,818 78.99% 18,894,406 14,946,606 79.11% Other Financing Sources 38,711,874 0 0.00% 39,426,765 0 0.00% Total Other Financing Sources 38,711,874 0 0.00% 39,426,765 0 0.00% Transfers 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Total Transfers 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Grand Totals 239,823,468 110,320,697 46.00% 266,600,773 117,570,471 44.10% COUNTY OF ROANOKE Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrar General Fund - C100 For the Ten Months Ending Sunday, April 30, 2023 Prior Year Current Year Expenditures Exp & Encum Expenditures Exp Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Budget & Encumbrances % c Legislative 331,603 320,792 96.74% 398,981 307,597 General & Financial Administration 7,904,251 6,307,509 79.80% 8,809,620 7,373,172 Electoral Board & Officials 471,516 485,052 102.87% 820,131 584,247 General Government Administration 8,707,370 7,113,354 81.69% 10,028,732 8,265,016 Courts Other Judicial Support 1,650,781 1,344,243 1,153,537 1,186,041 69.88% 88.23% 1,715,404 1,461,425 1,212,834 1,268,516 Judicial 2,995,024 2,339,578 78.12% 3,176,829 2,481,350 Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont Fire and Rescue Correction & Detention Animal Control Public Safety 14,991,033 17,360,251 9,679,077 837,711 12,494,914 14, 936, 649 7,408,539 688,546 83.35% 86.04% 76.54% 82.19% 16,914,417 20,140,445 10,862,582 1,124,393 14, 357, 342 17,129,159 8,573,470 847,779 42,868,072 35,528,648 82.88% 49,041,837 40,907,749 General Services Administration 797,665 933,041 116.97% 949,179 781,311 Refuse Disposal 5,441,462 4,196,570 77.12% 5,646,669 4,871,146 Maint Buildings & Grounds 5,049,229 4,338,620 85.93% 5,424,601 4,493,618 Engineering 1,664,905 1,555,970 93.46% 2,329,994 2,017,471 Inspections 1,569,358 1,004,452 64.00% 1,117,938 884,980 Garage Complex 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Public Works Prior Year Current Year Expenditures Exp & Encum Expenditures Exp Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Budget & Encumbrances % c 14,522,619 12,028,653 82.83% 15,468,381 13,048,526 Mental Health 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Public Health 515,902 551,601 106.92% 579,181 610,508 Social Services Administration 8,818,788 6,885,279 78.08% 8,651,519 6,689,536 Comprehensive Services Act 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Public Assistance 4,918,666 3,786,972 76.99% 4,918,666 3,713,323 Social Services Organizations 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Health and Welfare 14,253,356 11,223,852 78.75% 14,149,366 11,013,367 Parks & Recreation 2,390,260 1,747,788 73.12% 2,546,009 2,005,993 Library 4,356,057 3,279,062 75.28% 4,656,191 3,656,039 Cultural Enrichment 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Parks, Recreation & Cultural 6,746,317 5,026,850 74.51% 7,202,200 5,662,033 Planning & Zoning 1,304,878 978,856 75.02% 1,557,390 1,233,016 Cooperative Extension Program 87,097 25,009 28.71% 87,097 84,168 Economic Development 529,257 415,120 78.43% 563,335 423,275 Public Transportation 0 0 0.00% 766,930 166,941 Contribution to Human Service Organizations 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Planning 1,921,232 1,418,985 73.86% 2,974,752 1,907,400 Employee Benefits Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup 3,368,937 3,140,121 52,000 21,770 93.21 % 41.86% 1,666,434 1,059,635 67,000 51,460 Prior Year Current Year Expenditures Exp & Encum Expenditures Exp Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Budget & Encumbrances % c Miscellaneous 10,844,343 8,196,038 75.58% 10,494,982 8,776,369 Tax Relief/Elderly & Handicapp 1,110,000 728,560 65.64% 1,610,000 734,408 Refuse Credit Vinton 110,000 110,000 100.00% 225,000 168,750 Board Contingency 24,677,259 0 0.00% 29,813,889 0 Unappropriated Balance 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Non -Departmental 40,162,539 12,196,488 30.37% 43,877,305 10,790,622 Interfund Transfers Out Intrafund Transfers Out Transfers Out 101,497,037 88,906,537 87.60% 114,864,921 100,169,756 6,149,901 5,732,471 93.21% 5,816,452 5,332,676 107,646,938 94,639,008 87.92% 120,681,373 105,502,432 Grand Totals 239,823,467 181,515,416 75.69% 266,600,775 199,578,493 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid — April 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors $ $ $ 11,027,236.99 Payroll 04/14/23 1,727,191.71 13,532.06 1,740,723.77 Payroll 04/28/23 1,848,792.81 11,800.08 1,860,592.89 Manual Checks Grand Total $ 14,628,553.65 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. K.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss the employee engagement study results SUBMITTED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside to discuss the employee engagement study results with Judy England -Joseph, Consultant for the Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Terio and Lisa Comerose to remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS (Agricultural/Village Center District with conditions and special use permit) and AR (Agricultural/Residential District) located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance to remove proffer conditions from properties in an agricultural district. BACKGROUND: In 2011, the subject properties were rezoned from AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to AVC, Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions. In addition, a special use permit was granted for a convenience store. This petition was made by the previous owner, Glenn Reed, with the intention of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps, an office building, and a private school on the site. This rezoning was approved with a proffered condition that the site should be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted site plan and architectural renderings. This concept was never developed and the properties remain vacant. The special use permit is still valid under Section 15.2-2209.1 of the Code of Virginia. The General Assembly of Virginia has extended special use permit approvals and other governmental approvals related addressing the housing Page 1 of 3 crisis and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic. The applicants are seeking to construct single family dwellings on two of the three parcels. A single family dwelling is permitted by right in both AV (Agricultural/Village Center District) and AR (Agricultural/Residential District). However, since the existing proffered condition states that the site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan (and architectural renderings), and the site plan shows a convenience store, an office building, and a private school and no residential units, the proffered condition must be removed in order for the applicants to be able to construct single family homes. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on May 2, 2023. Three (3) citizens spoke during the public hearing regarding a potential grocery store / convenience store. Concerns raised regarding a grocery store/convenience store included: wanting limited development on Bent Mountain; speeding; whether turn lanes will be required; the lack of demand for a grocery store/convenience store due to existing businesses; and concerns over staffing at the Bent Mountain Fire and Rescue Station if a convenience store is constructed. The applicant's representative discussed the previous conditions on the property and stated that the intention of the parcel is to build two single family dwellings. He stated that the applicant is not asking for the existing special use permit for the convenience store to be rescinded so they may keep this open as an option in the future. He said that, at this time, there are no concrete plans to develop a convenience store and the applicant does not want to pursue that without more feedback from the community. The Planning Commission clarified: that this petition is to remove proffered conditions to allow for the construction of two single family homes; that the special use permit for a convenience store is still valid; that a grocery store would be classified as retail sales and would require a special use permit in the AV (Agricultural / Village Center) District: and that a convenience store is limited in size (3,000 square feet) in the AV District. The Planning Commission discussed that the construction of two residential homes was consistent with the Rural Preserve Future Land Use Designation and the County's Comprehensive Plan, and that the applicants should be able to build the single family residences. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request to remove the existing proffered conditions from the properties. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. Page 2 of 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance removing the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS, Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions and Special Use Permit, and AR, Agricultural/Residential District. Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Request: Location: Tax Parcels: Magisterial District: Existing Proffered Conditions (To Be Removed): EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Terio and Lisa Comerose Remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS, AgriculturalNillage Center District with Conditions and Special Use Permit, and AR, Agricultural/Residential District 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, 9786 Tinsley Lane #103.00-00-02-21.00-0000; 103.00-02-21.01-0000; 103.00-02-23.00-0000 Windsor Hills 1. The sitc shall be developed in substantial conformance with the sitc play} prepared by Pierson Engineering and Surveying, dated November 28, 2011, and 18, 2011. Terio and Lisa Comerose are petitioning to remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS, Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions and Special Use Permit, and AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The proffered condition is from a 2011 rezoning and states that the site shall be developed in conformance with the concept plan and architectural renderings for a proposed convenience store, private school and office building. The applicants' intent is to construct a single family dwelling on each of the two parcels fronting on Tinsley Lane. The existing Special Use Permit for a convenience store on the parcel fronting on Bent Mountain Road would remain and could be built in the future. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use designation of this area as Rural Preserve. Rural Preserve is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions are generally stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestall, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. Single family dwelling is an accepted use type at a density of one unit per three acres. The proposed single family dwellings are consistent with the Rural Preserve Future Land Use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a single family dwelling as "a site built or modular building designed for or used exclusively as one (1) dwelling unit for permanent occupancy." A single family dwelling is permitted by right in both the AV, Agricultural/Village Center District, and the AR, Agricultural/Residential District. However, since the existing proffered condition states that the site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan (and architectural renderings), and the site plan shows a convenience store, and office building, and a private school and no residential units, the proffer condition must be removed in order for the applicants to be able to construct single family homes. 1 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — In 2011, the subject properties were rezoned from AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to AVC, Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions. In addition, a special use permit was granted for a convenience store. This petition was made by the previous owner, Glenn Reed, with the intention of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps, an office building, and a private school on the site. This rezoning was approved with a proffered condition that the site should be developed in substantial conformance with the submitted site plan and architectural renderings. This concept was never developed and the properties remain vacant. The special use permit is still valid under Section 15.2-2209.1 of the Code of Virginia. The General Assembly of Virginia has extended special use permit approvals and other governmental approvals related addressing the housing crisis and most recently the COVID-19 pandemic. Topography/Vegetation — The subject parcels are flat and experience very little change in grade. The site is undeveloped open grassland with no established trees or other vegetation. Surrounding Neighborhood — The property is located off of both Bent Mountain Road and Tinsley Lane. To the north, it adjoins other properties zoned AV, Agricultural/Village Center District. To the northwest, south, and east the site adjoins properties zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential District. The property is less than two hundred yards south of the Bent Mountain Fire and Rescue Station, and is located directly across Bent Mountain Road from a VDOT maintenance facility. Bent Mountain Branch Library, Park, and Post Office are located in close proximity to the south of the subject site. Community Outreach — Approximately 45 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, and instructions for how to submit comments, and contact information for staff. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - No concept plan was submitted with this project. Before development of either the single family dwellings or convenience store could occur, comprehensive site and building plan reviews would be required. These reviews involve multiple agencies including, but not limited to, Roanoke County Building, Engineering, Planning and Zoning, VDOT, Fire and Rescue, and the Virginia Department of Health. Access/Traffic Circulation — The subject sites are located off of Tinsley Lane and Bent Mountain Road. Both roads are public right-of-ways maintained by VDOT. Any new entrances off of these roads would require review and approval by both VDOT and Roanoke County staff before construction. Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety — All construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Roanoke County Transportation - The 2020 Rural Bikeway Plan (attached) recommends a bike lane on Route 221/Bent Mountain Road adjacent to the subject parcels. As the Blue Ridge Parkway is a popular route for cyclists, the Roanoke County 200 Plan draft recommendations also include exploring potential bicycle connections to the Blue Ridge Parkway. For these reasons, please consider placing bike racks on the property to accommodate cyclists passing through Bent Mountain. Many cyclists already pass through Bent Mountain on a daily basis, and this number will likely increase in the future. 2 The Roanoke County 200 Plan draft recommendations (attached) also include evaluating potential pedestrian connections to businesses and destinations in the Bent Mountain community. Please consider constructing sidewalks or shared -use paths along the Bent Mountain and/or Tinsley Lane frontage of the subject parcels. Full comment with attachments is included with this report. Stormwater Operations - No comments. Fire and Rescue — Fire and Rescue does not object to the project and it will not increase the provided services. Fire flow and access requirements would be addressed during the site plan review process where applicable. General Services — General Services does not see any issues and has no comments. VDOT — 1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of-way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for private and commercial entrances. This includes, but is not limited to, commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3. Trip generation calculations will be required for this development with the first plan submittal, as well as right and left turn lane warrant calculations. 4. The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use designation of this area as Rural Preserve. Rural Preserve is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions are generally stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestall, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. Single family dwelling is an accepted use type at a density of one unit per three acres. The proposed single family dwellings are consistent with the Rural Preserve Future Land Use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Terio and Lisa Comerose are petitioning to remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS, Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions and Special Use Permit, and AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The intent is to construct a single family dwelling on each of the two parcels fronting on Tinsley Lane and to retain the existing Special Use Permit to construct a convenience store on the parcel fronting on Bent Mountain Road. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use designation of this area as Rural Preserve. The single- 3 family dwellings are consistent with the Rural Preserve Future Land Use Designation. CASE NUMBER: #5-512023 PREPARED BY: Alyssa Dunbar HEARING DATES: PC: May 2, 2023 BOS: May 23, 2023 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs AR District Regulations AV District Regulations Ordinance #121311-12 Proffered Site Plan Proffered Architectural Renderings Full Transportation Comments with Attachments Rural Preserve Future Land Use Designation 4 13 .1 AcC2cd) County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS For Staff Use Only Date receive: y ! �3 R �or e� s ' -I PC/BZA d : S a�a eJ Placards issued: BOS date: a Case Number 5 - 5 r< UR 3 3 Check type of application filed (check all that apply) t%oning o Special Use o Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip T l0 # V 1-1 CA L4M Ly'G$Lphane: (5-40) 7 j— i f g 3 / WWV7: /t)tr-44'Ga./ ,e . S4D vzi , . Cell #: --- 3//1/41 t✓1(/t1/ere.+4 f/r,✓d., 1,s,i%`4.2-GTi—G- Email: t f wi-eboritiaPli, ttitl A s tad ice./ yA- . flit Contact for Legal Ads 722 rte 1 air1 t-o5.- liOW • Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: !' '71 r i p k. t.em eety S-G akin i-45 f P . M4Aep.' z., Cell #: (g4 813 ' &r' 4 4 P, r,, Las; 654-0 Email: Gts ri 0 ID Old tin am 61 �-,cl 41 f.e A/ t VA ? 3-45 4 Property Location /6 4oc t B.6. t j m Er- +i N /7.-I'/ti/ ,_O�t. Magisterial District: y� l d1,Fit• rt17 r }� / �(, $ I, C, 6G/t' t-hi bliv. v. tv' 1V%A ? 4-Qsri Community Planning area: /ems f M 1S7/41/7_,/'AJ Tax Map No: 16 3 , 071- 0 a -- 1, t-v- a�1 ,• Existing Zoning: ��S Size ofparcel(s): Acres: j b , �:::)Z Existing Land Use: V REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RIS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: /rV-5 Proposed Land Use: i/tii✓ lc" Does tliyparccl meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ✓ No 1F NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). / Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes V l�io IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No v VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (Y/W/AA) Q4 Z Variance/Waiver of Section(s)'� of the Roanoke County Zoning Or ce in or�er ta: b., Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to ,-- C Appeal of interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinan�, 1 ��(123 �._.,W.',110111 Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to ,'( C Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/WICP V/AA R/SIW/CP VIAA 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application I hereby certify thal I am either the owner of the property or the owntr's age consent f the owner. Consultation Application Justification R/S/WICP V/AA Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and Owner's Signature 2 Application Requirements Consultation with the County Planning staff to review the feasibility of the proposal and to obtain recommended procedures and technical assistance. Applicant is encouraged to contact adjoining property owners to inform them of the proposal. Application must be legible and signed by property owner, contract purchaser, or owner's agent. Justification stating in general terms the change in use of the property, the effect of the changes on the surrounding area, the reasons for the request, the consistency of the request with the Community Plan, and the consistency of the request with the general purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose stated at the beginning of the applicable district regulations. Concept Plan of the proposed project and the concept plan checklist must be submitted with the applications. Plan must be 8.5" x 11". Metes and hounds description must accompany rezoning application. Water and sewer application and planimetric maps must accompany rezoning and special use permit application, if applicable. List of adjoining property owners including owner's names, addresses (mailing address including zip code) and tax map numbers of all adjoining properties and those directly across any public right-of-way must accompany application, including those in adjacent jurisdictions. Refer to tax records in the County Assessor's office. Application fees must accompany application and are as follows: Rezoning — Agri/Single/Two Rezoning— Multi -family Rezoning — Industrial Rezoning — Commercial Land Use Plan Amendment Special Use B Landfill Special Use B Other Variance Waiver Administrative Appeal Technology Fee $415 + $20/acre or portion thereof $860 + $25/acre or portion thereof $840 + $30/acre or portion thereof $945 + $32/acre or portion thereof $710 $1,875 $150 $190 $190 $275 5% fee on all permit issuing fees In addition, the applicant must pay legal advertisement fees. Staff will prepare ad for the applicant and deliver ad to The Roanoke Times. The applicant will be billed by The Roanoke Times for the ad. Please include email and phone number Public Hearing Notices must be posted at clearly visible locations along the street frontage or property lines of the subject property. Notices will be issued by Planning & Zoning following receipt of the completed application. For further information or assistance, please contact: Department of Planning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone (540) 772-2068 - Fax (540)776-7155 E-Mail: planning tc roanokecountvva.tov All required items must be submitted before the application deadline. 1 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive F O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/BZA date: Placards issued: BOS date:. Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Che5Jt type of application filed (check all that apply) ezoning o Special Use ❑ Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip "T•et+6 dih4(L-14A C8 IT; ft1144r44.P P. 't'CYr/J ‘ 4 4 CC- Phone: (5-'-0 72 C ) IS Cell #: , -1/4-11 l' irpatrr$ / Al ivy, s4.c i-c,ZCD--s: PL(, AND* VA •a 4-b j a Email: A.S47t:V1.1''+@O/V bliV.CAM, Contact for Legal Ads ar it c ,11Aprl 5c., ,4 ow. Owner's name/address w/zip T 'o fr. Gtrn, i -e- e.nrk L, t.64... ie c,ory,L.s-r1 P. a ) »( G 54 G f e.--A, ,4fl . lv . V4 .J 3 5 8 Phone #: `.' cell it: (0 4 Vb -(a2.03 Email: Cetvr i d Ottf iCt, Gt,M Property Location xArts t+ L4-M,e, OGMV l alA tetI' , Vu1 0 53 Magisterial District: tir iike2W ' hi 1 ill Community Planning area: at f' 4 m ,fir fici /\f Tax Map No.: Existing Zoning: 4 vG. -C (0 3 • o-0 , 2 '" 1- I - Q , - Q u G'T! Size of parcel(s): Acres: I • C 8. a' Existing Land Use: VA (,v t- REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN{15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/'W/CP) Proposed Zoning: A \6S Proposed Land Use: ,s' /hL1 G—1r1FMi % P1/� 14 i A-b ci ft i—ei Does thsHa reel tneet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ✓ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes V No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST / If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No ✓ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) VariancefWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to , Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x I 1"concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's age t r contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. Owner's Signature 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/DZA date: Placards issued: DOS date: Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) vftezoning a Special Use o Variance o Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip /. i f0 A✓ LI0 t ASe- Phone: ( 540) 72.5-- 8 1 e 3 /r6C / ,f /171r4Y(4W f • Vbs./ Cell #: _3i it GA.Aptrot/ prwe— l44/ 1`� Email: J1r k1vv.J-A4 Pam, if4- VA a-..o Contact for Legal Ads "2ji'� tl1.c?-Cy ,rrt low Owner's name/address iv/zip / Phone #: rgykieS-'/'- t4/nG/1Sc_ ex- 1i/501 -, • qrrwrireell #: (104)117 34,2- t) f?o X W 5 40 Email: (.r.`f 0 en fiIow, GOP( 6rf Alai/ 1,4 ? ,_ Property Location q f R Magisterial District: Pyr /4/ 0.. / hi Atli/ lA ?- y,�5-±' 1 Community Planning area: in CV 1T—J¢ / Tax Map No.: ' 3, co- b • roExisting I 1 �23 .�U J Zoning:_S� / / Ap / "I ✓t%� Size of parcel(s): Acres: D.1 03 Existing Land Use: V"itretArT REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN 05.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RJS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: _5P i / E /1-X / .4 VS Proposed Land Use: _SjA,yi - Fitly? jL-cj VI,Y.I . jt,l"A/6 i ck.- _i(z..d. Does thcjAircel meet the minimum tot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes V No 1 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes V" No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes , No ✓ 1 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to . Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SIW/CP V/AA RJS/W/CP V/AA 3 I/2" x 11"concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application I j Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agenyPontract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and Consent f the owner. Consultation Application Justification RJSI W/CP V/AA Application fee Proffers, if applicable Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant .L� i' i,L% _1C r �arf�.t ��`t /1 t;a` ,t.r, C rn'*- The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. 3 Roanoke County Rezoning Application to remove proffered condition applicable to 9651 Bent Mountain Road, Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 (Tax Map No. 103.00-02- 21.00-0000) ("Parcel 1"), 9744 Tinsley Lane, Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 (Tax Map No. 103.00-02-21.01-0000) ("Parcel 2"), and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 (Tax Map No. 103.00-02-23.00-0000) ("Parcel 3") (collectively, the "Properties"): Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zo ing district classification in the Zoning Ordinance, This request to remove the proffered conditions applicable to the Properties furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purposes found at the beginning of the AR and AV zoning district classifications. In 2011, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance No. 121311-12 (the "Ordinance"), which rezoned current Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and about one- half (1/2) of Parcel 3 from Agricultural/Residential District ("AR") to Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions and Special Use ("AVCS"). The Ordinance approved a special use permit for a convenience store and contained one condition ...that " tlhe site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan prepared by Pierson Engineering and Surveying, dated November 28, 2011, and the architectural renderings prepared by Interactive Design Group dated July 18, 2011 [(the "Original Plan")]." The Original Plan, attached hereto, contemplates a "convenience store with hardware, deli, and gas pumps" off Bent Mountain Road on current Parcel 1, a one-story "school area for 100 students K-12th grade" with an entrance off Tinsley Lane on each of current Parcels 1, 2, and 3, and a twenty -foot landscaping buffer of evergreens in between the school and the convenience store that traverses each of current Parcels 1, 2, and 3. The property subject to the Ordinance was never developed, however, and it was ultimately sold to the current owner in a substantially similar state as that prior to the passing of the Ordinance. The current owner of the properties subject to the Ordinance purchased the remaining land that makes up the current application and subdivided it to create what is now being referred to as current "Parcel 1," "Parcel 2," and "Parcel 3," or collectively the "Properties." The owner's intent by doing so is to construct a single-family detached dwelling on Parcel 2 as well as a single-family detached dwelling on Parcel 3. The owner is also open to the possibility of constructing a convenience store on Parcel 1, as many in the Bent Mountain community have reached out to the owner to show their support in doing so. As the Ordinance requires development in substantial conformance with the 100401855-1 } Original Plan, this rezoning application to remove the proffered condition applicable to the Properties is necessary to allow for the construction of a convenience store on Parcel 1, a single-family detached dwelling on Parcel 2, and a single-family detached dwelling on Parcel 3. One of the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance is to implement the comprehensive plan of Roanoke County (the "Plan"). This request to remove the proffered condition applicable to the Properties furthers this purpose by allowing development in such a way that is otherwise permitted by right in the underlying zoning districts and that is contemplated in the Plan. As the developer of the Original Plan abandoned the project and sold the land, the proffered condition applicable to the Properties will prevent their development and result in the Properties remaining vacant for the foreseeable future. in a similar vein, this request to remove the proffered condition applicable to the Properties furthers the purposes of both the AR and Agricultural/Village Center ("AV") ,Districts in particular. It furthers the purposes of the AR District by providing a path for low density residential and institutional uses and an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. It furthers the purposes of the AV District by contributing to the sense of community in the surrounding rural areas and by providing a path for the development of small service and personal service businesses. In both the AR and the AV Districts, single-family detached dwellings are allowed by right and use as a convenience store is permitted by special use permit. Please explain how the project conforms to the generalguidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. General guidelines and policies contained in the Plan include encouraging sustainable economic growth that enhances the quality of life and fosters economic health, encouraging land use development patterns that reflect community values and desires while recognizing the uniqueness of the community, and allowing flexibility in site design to encourage the preservation of unique natural resources and open space. The project conforms to each of these general guidelines and policies by allowing otherwise vacant property to be put to use in a way that is both contemplated by the Plan and permitted in the underlying zoning district. The project contributes to the economic growth of the Bent Mountain community and provides a path forward for use of Parcel 1 in such a way that would enhance the quality of life and foster economic health for the residents of Bent Mountain. As the proffered condition limits development of the Properties to the Original Plan, its removal provides the flexibility in site design needed to put the Properties to economical use. {00401855-1 Please describe the impacts) of the request on the property itself, the adjoininc) properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The impact of this request on the Properties themselves, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area is to allow the Properties' development and to do so in such a way that does not require substantial conformance with the Original Plan's contemplation of use as a school. As the developer of the Original Plan abandoned the project, the Properties are prevented from use at all except in a very limited way. Without this request and the removal of the proffered condition, the Properties will remain vacant unless and until a subsequent owner thereof is ready, willing, and able to develop the Properties in substantial conformance with Original Plan. Vis-a-vis the Original Plan, the request provides a path forward for a much less intense use of the Properties than that contemplated by the Original Plan. The impact of this request on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue, is much less than that contemplated by the Original Plan. As stated above, the request provides a path forward for a much less intense use of the Properties than that contemplated by the Original Plan, which will naturally result in Tess demand and strain on the existing public services and facilities that service the area. {OO40 855-1 ) JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the Folio •ing factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, dcscri how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with tit mended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 2, The variance will not be of a substantial detri era to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. 3. Evidence s sporting claim: 4 JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheep of paper. I. Reasons for appeal: 2. Evidence supporting claim: 5 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall grap -ally depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any ► ential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer onditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not • manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required tar to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and Couy development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered nd accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent crmitled by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, c=.mmunity plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site plann` The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exem^ some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensio d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke ' unty tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, atural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjac tt properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and pro scd, and dimensions, floor area and heights i, Location, widths and names all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and location. Fall driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information require for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utiliti- - (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site I. Any drivew s, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topograpl map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approx. nate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Loca ons of all adjacent fire hydrants p. A proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certif that all items required in the checklist above are complete, gnature of applicant Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash ▪ Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Petition s Signature °01 3 Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 List of Adjoining Property Owners (names, mailing addresses, and tax map numbers, including those directly across public rights of way): David A. Deel and Larhonda L. Deel 9615 Bent Mountain Road Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Tax Map No. 103,00-02-16.00-0000 Bent Mountain Point, LLC 23 Franklin Road Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Tax Map No. 103.00-02-17.00-0000 Site address: 9607 Bent Mountain Road Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Bent Mountain Point, LLC 23 Franklin Road Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Tax Map No. 103.00-02-18.00-0000 Site address: 9732 Tinsley Lane Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Amelia A. Molitoriss 9759 Bent Mountain Road Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Tax Map No, 103.00-02-22.00-0000 Bent Mountain Farms, LLC Attn: David Higginbotham 5315 Fox Den Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Tax Map No, 103.00-02-24.00-0000 Site address: 0 Tinsley Lane Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 (00401936-1 } Bent Mountain Farms, LLC Attn: David Higginbotham 5315 Fox Den Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Tax Map No. 103.00-02-25.01-0000 Site address: 9809 Tinsley Lane Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Bent Mountain Farms, LLC Attn: David Higginbotham 5315 Fox Den Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Tax Map No. 103.00-02-20.00-0000 Site address: 0 Tinsley Lane Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Carson L. King and Sylvia P. King 9755 Tinsley Lane Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Tax Map No. 103.00-02-19.00-0000 Commonwealth of Virginia 9700 Bent Mountain Road Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Tax Map No. 103.00-03-48.00-0000 William D. Carlisle and Lisa A. Carlisle 9736 Bent Mountain Road Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Tax Map No. 103.00-03-50.00-0000 {00401936-1 } f, K I QW ALL MEN BY THESE PINT 70 MIT- 7NA7 Ego eau aI MOSE AND USA RENEE COi6a75E ARE ME FIX SMPLE COWERS OF LAND S1fo1NM HEREON BONDED 8Y CORNERS 6, 7, e, 77, 5 TO 6, ellatarW AND BEING Ate OF DE LAND CON4EY 10 soD OWI23 8Y DEED RECORDED IN IRE aE01$ aTIC£ OF 71E 00101T couR7 CF 71 COUNTY aF RoA7M MR INTA RI I6717II6917 MASER 222210.312 THAT T6d0 N71f q * ,BTU AND USA RIME COICTOFE ARE TEE FEE SIRE PRIERS OF DIE LAND SNOW HEREON BOWED BY colitis S 1 2 2 4. ;s H. 6, & 10, 70 1, 0N(IFf9YE AND BANG ALL NE LAND COf 01590 TD SAID 01RERS BY DEED RECEND D IN I E =Des LF71LF <F THE f7RCLlr 001017 OF 0E COUNTY OF ROANOKE room Af 807180 F7i7 FARANY 232210372 7!E SAD MOE1a7ESY COMP 778AT 1H4T NAME SJR .1UD 7F:E LAND AS MOW liEEa1 Meal of DEN 0WM FREE EL AND AM ACG{77DAHCE NTH EECDoN 7s2-2710 1HRt7DCif 152-2279 a= 71E 6:OtE MR076A 1950 (As AN97mED to DAZE) Am N17H 7HE 9Usuirs f CROAfAHCE GF THE =NIT CF MANOR& AMNIA (AS ALEMS@ TOME) II NEAES WERE01 ARE HQ0BY PLACED THE FE LO'AWNG SA7UT7I ES AND SEALs 72301078 DATE 0LS4 RE7AE LL'1ffRCg BOUNDARY COORDINATES Poor 74177NIHG EASTNG 5 3556170.43 11011357.42 1 3587717.35 11012038.84 10 3587741.35 11011974,04 2 3559790.13 11E11760 37 3 359703723 11011592E9 4 35E637745 11011471.70 6 3537526_35 11911231.76 7 35E7545.46 11011214.80 APPROVED: APPROVAL FIESDF 8Y 1)E RLWSOE stuffy SLEVM5OF AOENTiS FOR FL9R'OSES OF &sew ccoiPLLANLE NF1N THE 9048106E COUNTY = MEAN CRDINAN0F mum MA77= SUED! AS COMAS MIX WITH 5501000NI£ QOI0HAN75 DR ODFIER TF1LE ROZARE141917& APFI2CABIE 1D 11E FIMGVFRTY SHORN 1R 363N. ARE NOT R0ZEMEO OR AFFRONED NUTS REGARD TO TENS SA3PMS0H 0R RESVOCIRSION CANE O1 0 STATE OF STATE LT OF A NOTARY AMC IN AND Fre THE AFORESAID STA7E DO IffFiF.SY lill15FY 1NA71Fnr0 7(AN MORO', I NOSE NAME AS 9IEN 70 THE F INFIRLINDIT HAS PEtSOW[LY APPEARED 8ET0FE WAND AODIORREDGED l E SUE ON TH3 _ Cur OF 2022 ( A NOTARY PUBLIC AN AND FUR R6E AMMO STATE. I FEREBT cER8F1' THAT r7.cA IMArr•' Ct>1F61701 MNv5E NAME is sae TC 71E FOREG 6i6 OFSTRUME 6T HAS PE W:WALLY APPEARED LEFWE ME AND AQONNIEDCED TFE SANE ON 71A5 _ DAY OF 0222 MY t, 9I9ori Ei7APE+' ON: RECM7R'AT@1 NO: INY COINS T CORES ONE RERSIRADON NIL: NOTARY PUBIC N34-4.a34'E NCrARr-Role IlitE EY LASE - VA. MC. RiE ¢711 AO' .'yam , (Y3'.FRUCRIFTIVE iT-cF-HAY1 ftt-7"5' a?` fr 1. Q .-J FBITAX - N 12` 51'- 14 E .6A1,06' — •eT- el �4�: 01 r \� ,, TRACT BI-A CRWN J - +0979 ACRES Fo o Coo. TRACT al . t A, FIEND l +1.1? FRic- T�IaE: OF 1 / ,.: evez,, (NEW ill0 1ER O K. CD.IEROSE & • USA R. COMEROSE [NST. 8202210313 TRACT 'Cl" 03.713 AC,) {NSt i20U912915 TAX PARCEL 6703.00-02-21.00-6000 1 & $ LV1A P. Y1I00 II157, 1200216856 PARa1 1y103.00-112-43,00-• r• 1 AL- @i111E o 15.si 1 1RACT CI-8 T.5Sl ACRPS TAX PARCEL " 7103.00-fr2-21d11-0000 ti rQom' ,1 s 7 i y F • DI ro - 5 TRACT C1-A 13.713 ACRES SURVEYED - 1524 ACRES TO TRACT B1-A -- 1,532 ACRES TO TRACT CI-S ..5011 AU1f5-1WE11 06ic 'PIK":.Bq 10.228 ACRES • 5 10 56341'00'E 60.10' 1Rr SXOtNS N ADENr Fur ROANGNE 079071, FLANMM comissoN DATE AM ERE amCs CFFILE 0? IRE craw &NAV or 1FE CRIFTY CF 6OVl1N7; 5MAK DMS MAP XAS AA®VlED WIN THE CFi71FTCA7E Cr 4004011[IDCIENT 77EE7D A7TAL7ffD ADYF1ED 70 FEccED A7 OLLOL7C 1L OF MIS DAY OF . 2022. 6[slht 51ELE MCGRAW BY• CLEW .5:16' 43' co' 74, 96g14' BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD- U.S. R1E 221 (5o' RIGHT--CF-8AY) LE : IRS • -, ROD SET IRFC) - RRON ROD F7IJN0 E - 578.00LA1EO PO'Rr - POWER POI! FD - FOUND vAC - 181FBY VACATx'7J AC - AEA' -K—a- FU(Li LINE —E— - OVERHEAD EEECT IC 1 HEREBY 0ER11FY THAT THIS PRATE FROM A CURRENT FIELD SIRYEY AND IS CORRECT TO 'NE REST OF NY 614044230E AND BELIEF, 1I101HY FL CALDISFLL 0 rr 061011E 0611611 i700' 70 9JNG5 GAP HMI) 0 50' 130' 200' SCALE: = 11C' DAVID A LAIC -CND. !NSF. 321 TAX PARTS iy107. Matter tic Crai 701 FIRST M0100, 5.1 0011YAE . 1M1fi1 Sl 2401 (540) 345-934 FAX EA 345-764 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 ORDINANCE 121311-12 REZONING 13.7 ACRES FROM AR, AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO AV, AGRICULTURAL/ VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT, FOR PRIMARY/SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AND GENERAL OFFICE USE AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED AT 9651 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 103.00-02-21.00), UPON THE APPLICATION OF GLENN REED WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 2011, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 13, 2011; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on this matter on October 4, 2011 and December 5, 2011; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Glenn Reed for a convenience store located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved. 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 13.7 acres, as described herein, and located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road (Tax Map Number 103.00-02-21.00) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to the zoning Page 1 of 3 classification of AV, AgriculturalNillage Center District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of Glenn Reed. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan prepared by Pierson Engineering and Surveying, dated November 28, 2011, and the architectural renderings prepared by Interactive Design Group dated July 18, 2011, 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Being 13.7 acres of real estate located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road and further described as Tax Map No. 103.00-02-21.00. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full farce and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Elswick to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: rah C. Jack Clerk to the Board o upervisors cc: Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Page 2 of 3 William Driver, Director of Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Murphy, Zoning Administrator Page 3 of 3 ulotion or connection ond office buildings, eed -twenty (20) feet In arcerce ond materials espy shall be recessed e slte. fixhires. shall be ,e grade. my or grayish -brown. Ical be oe Mr ihis doveloprnent. to generally match the architecture osesed seuen (7) feel In signs shall be eitonnet• lit, ground so res to to cost t:gtn onto the' oroperty. eupy less Than five (5) percent number of signs shall be limited iehind buildings. ;torts of Section Zcancite County Zoning Ordtnanco Tx* IDDADI-62-24.D. Ea. Dr, 111,ninalhan lbounvowS: i501'DOM tate .evni Sag xt.1.00-02-25,D1 WAD D, xnecteei Zent. lend U, Vcioni 2744 • t'gr0:74.7:1 ATE711.1 ▪ \• . I ask, z -1--7P:1 laYi t i / = , =/ "1-1- i I. i 01 1 / i . qi.• Ee•1,4. F.N1CR ,IP. OV1ri ' .......' ----, ....-r1 ,/ ''',........ i 1 : verntr. ' ..: a. 1. tocelkm. , -........_ 1 sera uouiruem F:VAD / US fiClitt..#221 319 KIN / 7.0 ID4M-132-/M11 Dend 14.06.19ent ItteSJ 2DOM. Zen-.52 LDre De. Van., - rixact•LJNE w. SEC. WI. 7'1 • Tor, 147..CC-R-111-= ikmalrun.r...2001111,54, 2..16 *I. it. VP 0,41 Lone um: PultronDel Imo 10.124-CD-11oD D.:. L. coo.o 111025.34 bp. Ar 2001307 u:a. Caiumnsi. 1114,41 re' unease:A% Ihritm ,,`"" 5.4winK Cworsom. Buffer Yard Da In... Venn , WO, ; / alas Building. Cen.lne1.4. ,q.AP}IaC SCAIZ 11111212-112-16.00 I0=4' 1T:04Z Lend 1114g5 14..1141 a. 4s EA PIERSON ENGINEERING SURVEYING P-U BOX 511 44 iSTAVRCAD DAL£VILIS., VA 24Ce3 403 344-3127 000. C.C. 9.46-5906 MX c_ Li Is/ 4.1 71 CC >— < z L.! 15 z E-77 > 1. 0 0 0 BELL TOWER /�- ALUMINUM FINISH METAL ROOF WHITE WINDOWS DARK RED SIDING EARTH BERM ON SIDES STONE BASE- FRUNT 3ROUP 3-342.7S3M 1-842-7526 '.I DGARCHITECTURE.COM PROJECT NAME: GLEN REED PROPERTIES SKETCH NAME: E W 1,A" DATE: 7-18-2112 JOBNUUADft 1123 SHEET nwmaxA-1 O 1 ALUMINUM FINISH METAL ROOF WHITE WINDOW AND DORMER PAGE WHITE COLUMNS & TRIM WHITE WINDOWS DARK RED SIDING PROJECT NAME: GROUP o•342.7534 D-342.7536 l l aaAR£H ITFCTU R E.£A M GLEN REED PROPERTIES SKETCH NAME: 1/8" _ 1_D" BRTE 7--lawn SCALE 11B""1'-0' 3033 NUMBER 1123 SHEET HUNTER A-10 2 PROJECT NAME ROUP 342-7534 142.7536 )GARCHRECTURE.COM GLEN REED PROPERTIES SKETCH NAME `i AWMINUM FINISH METAL ROOF -'-^� WHITE WINDOW AND DORMER FACE WHITE WINDOWS DARK RED SIDING 1/8" =1'-0" MITE 7-111.20u SC LE 1/B'. 1,0. ER 2123 2A-103 9796 Aerial Map Terio and Lisa Comerose 9651 Bent Mountain Rd Lot Size: 10.228 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS 9786 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 2.903 Acres Existing Zoning: AR / AVCS Proposed Zoning: AR / AVS 9744 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 1.582 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS Total Lot Size:14.7 Acres Total AVCS Area:13.7 Acres Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Subject Sites Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ROANOKE Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 145 290 580 Date: 3/ 16/2 023 1:4,514 S�avir�o i 0 Rook Co rim W ©ga r �JfdnlGu��l ■f _.� JJ Roanoke County :Virginia 2019 Zoning Map Terio and Lisa Comerose 9651 Bent Mountain Rd Lot Size: 10.228 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS 9786 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 2.903 Acres Existing Zoning: AR / AVCS Proposed Zoning: AR / AVS 9744 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 1.582 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS Total Lot Size: 14.7 Acres Total AVCS Area: 13.7Acres Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Zoning AR AV Subject Sites Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 4 ROANOKE CCLN VA Feet 0 145 290 580 Date: 3/ 16/2 023 1:4,514 J J i 22t 41 21 #8 Bent Fire Rescue RoanokeCounty, Virginia 2019 } Future Land Use Map Terio and Lisa Comerose 9651 Bent Mountain Rd Lot Size: 10.228 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS 9786 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 2.903 Acres Existing Zoning: AR / AVCS Proposed Zoning: AR / AVS 9744 Tinsley Ln Lot Size: 1.582 Acres Existing Zoning: AVCS Proposed Zoning: AVS Total Lot Size: 14.7 Acres Total AVCS Area: 13.7Acres Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Future Land Use ■ Conservation Rural Preserve Rural Village Village Center F 1 Subject Sites Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ROANOKE Roanoke VA 24018 Feet 0 145 290 580 Date: 3/ 16/2 023 1:4,514 696 9 w 0) J 9619 960 ''C' J J \,J 12 O97z6 #8 Bent Fire Rescue J L -I L i L. T �, �:. ��`s. 1 SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-1. Purpose. (A) These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. (Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-34-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture * Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * Forestry Operations * Stable, Commercial * Stable, Private * Wayside Stand * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type II * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 1 of 4 Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * Short -Term Rental * Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems * 2. Civic Uses Camps * Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Safety Services * Utility Services, Major * 3. Commercial Uses Antique Shops * Golf Course Kennel, Commercial * Special Events Facility * Studio, Fine Arts 4. Industrial Uses (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 2 of 4 Custom Manufacturing * Resource Extraction * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 7, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 62795- 10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 082818-8 , § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 091019-4 , § 1, 9-24-20; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-34-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system: a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet) b. Frontage: 110 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 30,000 square feet b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. Lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 25,000 square feet b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet b. Accessory structures: 15 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet b. Accessory structures: 10 feet 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 3 of 4 5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 20 feet from any side property line. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. All structures: 45 feet (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 25 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 4 of 4 SEC. 30-36. AV AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT. Sec. 30-36-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the AV, agricultural/village center district is to establish areas which will serve as the focal point for cultural and commercial activity of the rural service areas of the county, as envisioned in the comprehensive plan land use category of the same name. The density recommended for these areas is intended to average between one (1) and three (3) units per acre. Small country stores, family restaurants, and similar small service and personal service businesses, in addition to public and institutional buildings such as schools, post offices and places of religious assembly, are commonly found at these crossroad locations. These areas bring a sense of community to the surrounding rural areas, with an emphasis on providing the essential goods and services to rural residents, but are not intended as employment destinations for urban residents. New development should therefore be carefully considered for its compatibility with the surrounding development and the purpose and intent of this district. Any expansion of these areas should be contiguous to existing village center areas to avoid leap -frog commercial development. Similarly additional development may warrant additional public services, such as community sewer and water systems. (Ord. No. 042799-11, §§ 1f., 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-36-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture * Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * Stable, Private * Wayside Stand * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type II * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * Residential Human Care Facility (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 1 of 5 Single -Family Dwelling, Attached * Single -Family Dwelling, Detached Two -Family Dwelling * 3. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs * Community Recreation * Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Religious Assembly * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 4. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office * Medical Office * 5. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops * Bed and Breakfast * Consumer Repair Services Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, General * Short -Term Rental * Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 2 of 5 Wind Energy System, Small* (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Commercial * 2. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems * Multi -family Dwelling * Townhouse * 3. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Cemetery * Crisis Center Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Utility Services, Major * 4. Commercial Uses Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast Inn * Boarding House Business Support Services Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Construction Sales and Services * Convenience Store * Country Inn * Equipment Sales and Rental * Fuel Center* Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Kennel, Commercial * Mini -warehouse * (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 3 of 5 Restaurant, Drive In or Fast Food * Retail Sales * Special Events Facility * 5. Industrial Uses Construction Yards * Custom Manufacturing * Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 082818-8 , § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-36-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 25,000 square feet b. Frontage: 85 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. Lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 15,000 square feet b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 4 of 5 a. Principal structures: 25 feet b. Accessory structures: 3 feet 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. All structures: 45 feet (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 75 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:13 [EST] Page 5 of 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 ORDINANCE 121311-12 REZONING 13.7 ACRES FROM AR, AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO AV, AGRICULTURAL/ VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT, FOR PRIMARY/SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AND GENERAL OFFICE USE AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED AT 9651 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 103.00-02-21.00), UPON THE APPLICATION OF GLENN REED WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September27, 2011, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 13, 2011; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on this matter on October 4, 2011 and December 5, 2011; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Glenn Reed for a convenience store located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved. 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 13.7 acres, as described herein, and located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road (Tax Map Number 103.00-02-21.00) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to the zoning Page 1 of 3 classification of AV, AgriculturalNillage Center District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of Glenn Reed. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan prepared by Pierson Engineering and Surveying, dated November 28, 2011, and the architectural renderings prepared by Interactive Design Group dated July 18, 2011. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Being 13.7 acres of real estate located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road and further described as Tax Map No. 103.00-02-21.00. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Elswick to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: eborah C. Jack Clerk to the Board oUZupervisors cc: Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Page 2 of 3 William Driver, Director of Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Murphy, Zoning Administrator Page 3 of 3 General Notes: 1. There will be no vehicular or pedestrian circulati between the school and the convenience store c 2. The convenience store canopy shall not exceed height. The canopy shall match the appearan the convenience store. Lighting in the canopy and directed downward and inward into the sii 3. All proposed freestanding light poles, including less than eighteen (18) feet in height above g Light poles and fixtures shall be black, gray c 4. Two (2) free standing monument signs shall k The monument sign shall be constructed to c and material of the buildings and shall not height or ten (10) feet in width. These sign lit, or tip lit with a shielded light source so path of traffic or any adjacent road or prop 5. Signage placed on a building wall shall occupy of the facade of the wall. The maximum nur to three (3) signs per business. 6. Dumpsters shall be screened and located behin 7. All landscaping shall comply with the provisions Clearbrook Village Overlay District, of the Roan Tax# David Insturn Lan SCHOOL HOUSE ‘140 INTERACTIVE DESIGN GROUP 3016TH STREET ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 29016 3016TH STREET ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 (P) saoaaz-�saa (F)540d42-7536 WWW.IDGARCHITECTURE.COM W.IDGARCHITE 540-342-7534 540-342-7536 W W W.IDGARCHITECTURE.COM PROJECT NAME: GLEN REED PROPERTIES II MI COUNTRY STORE INTERACTIVE DESIGN GROUP 301 6TH STREET ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 (P) 540-342-7534 (F) 540-342-7536 WWW.IDGARCHITECTURE.COM PROJECT NAME: GLEN REED PROPERTIES OFFICE / RETAIL INTERACTIVE DESIGN GROUP 301 6TH STREET ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 (P) 540-342-7534 (F) 540-342-7536 W W W. I DGARCH ITECTU RE.COM PROJECT NAME: GLEN REED PROPERTIES Page 1 of 2 Cecelia Thomas Fwd: Review Comment Requested -- Terio and Usa Comerose c From: Megan Cronise To: Planning, Planning Date: 4/5/2023 1.1.:00 AM Subject: Fwd: Review Comment Requested -- Terio and Lisa Comerose Cc: Thompson, Philip; James, Rebecca; Dunbar, Alyssa; Henry, Isaac Attachments: Terio and Lisa Comerose - Original Submission with maps.pdf; Rural Bikeway Plan - Comerose Excerpt.pdf; Roanoke County 200 Plan - Comerose Excerpt.pdf Good morning, Transportation comments are as follows: The 2020 Rural Bikeway Plan (attached) recommends a bike lane on Route 221/Bent Mountain Road adjacent to the subject parcels. As the Blue Ridge Parkway is a popular route for cyclists, the Roanoke County 200 Plan draft recommendations also include exploring potential bicycle connections to the Blue Ridge Parkway. For these reasons, please consider placing bike racks on the property to accommodate cyclists passing through Bent Mountain. Many cyclists already pass through Bent Mountain on a daily basis, and this number will likely increase in the future. The Roanoke County 200 Plan draft recommendations (attached) also include evaluating potential pedestrian connections to businesses and destinations in the Bent Mountain community. Please consider constructing sidewalks or shared -use paths along the Bent Mountain and/or Tinsley Lane frontage of the subject parcels. Please contact me with questions. Thank you, Megan Megan G. Cronise, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Roanoke County Department of Planning (540) 772-2106 mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov »> Cecelia Thomas 3/16/2023 4:07 PM »> Good Afternoon, Please find attached an application packet for the petition mentioned above. The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this petition on Tuesday, May 2, 2023. Please review and email your comments to planning@roanokecountyva.gov by Friday, April 7th, 2023. Thank you, file:///C:/Useis/cmormin/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/642D54BDPO1 DOMAINA-L_... 4/5/2023 Page 2 of 2 Gec e-(.i.a ha may Planning Administrative Assistant Department of Planning Phone 540-772-2082 Fax 540-776-7155 cthomas( roanokecountyvagov file:///C:/Users/cmonnin/AppDatalLocal/Temp/XPgrpwise/642D54BDPO1 DOMAINA-L_... 4/5/2023 Roanoke Valley-Alleghany REGIONAL commission Figure 21: Roanoke County Recommendations Map Legend VDOT Roads Gravel Roads Appalachian Trail Other Built Trails Blue Ridge Parkway TPO 2Q40 Boundary Conservation Easements Public Lands Recommendations Bike Lane Paved Shoulders Signage Only - Widen Lanes .. - Improved Data 0 1 2 4 6 8 Miles a) 'O 113 ,v rr� O T 1 0 CO 1011 0 CO 0 Np1 W is L COm Paved Shoulder Paved Shoulder Paved Shoulder Paved Shoulder Bike Lanes Paved Shoulder P- PPICOwo'o !P aved Shoulder Paved Shoulder z Improved Data Needed Improved Data Needed Improved Data Needed Improved Data Needed Paved Shoulder Paved Shoulder z z 111 r t34, s�,• RTE 711.NORTH 'f , . RTE 708(IVY RIDGE RD) RTE 697 RTE 311 aIT,0 rx w RTE622, RTE 873 BOTETOURT:CL RTE 320 RTE 864 NORTH RTE 785 CRAIG CL .I8MINORTH RTE779 ISANDYRIDGERD; RTE 697 . (RTE 620 (RTE 311 (Bradshaw Road (622) tl 0 01 1 'rJ 6 '3 Tinsley Lane (711) - Bent Mountain Road (221) z N c4 u. Poage Valley Road (690) 1 "d .1 yy O a4 ISegrtte t. From _ ......._ .... . _ RTE-708 , RIDGE;RD ; FLOYD CL MONTGOMERY CL RTE 697 RTE699 RTE 873 RTE 311 . MONTOGOMERY CL RTE 320 RTE 311 .46 MI MORTHRTE 419 . .18 MI NORTH RTE 779 RTE 785 RTE 864 NORTH WCLMONTGOMERY CO RTE 697 RTE 620 Catawba Valley Road (311) Roanoke CountyLimit Sugar Camp Creek Road (690) Urbanized Boundary Bottom Creek Lane (607) RTE:785 .. -. BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD Slings Gap Road (612) } Dutch Oven Road (863) !Beat Mountain Road N(221) 0 tif Q N fii PIV1 V] GO m 1 VI 1 4 CA Vi 53 W IA 5i CA CA Sa S V1 CA Al CA S con EA 1 m v! 1 53 Col v] F3 -m W 8 71 Si S ill O .,,CIUUUU a 0 0 0 0 0 0 aa tltl 0 0 0 0 c4a'c4 Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County 0 0 0 0 a a0 a 4Ag Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County: Roanoke County (Roanoke County'- Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County C)6 a o a xc4 X 0 O 00221 00785 00785 00622 00622 00864 00622 00779 00779 00311 00311 00311 00311 00624 00624 00624 00864 00669 00690 00612 00144 100697 00612 0 0 01404 00711 Road Name _,. Bent MouatainRoad'(221 Bent Mountain Road (221) BlacksbutgRoad (735) ,- 0 0 A (Bradshaw Road (622) Bradshaw Road (622) Bradshaw Road (622) Catawba Creek Road (779) Catawba Creek Road (779) Catawba Valley Drive (311) in In qq A Lafa › .› 1a a a.a 4-4 CA qq d� °tl a 0 S 0z Newport Road (624) Newport Road (624) Old Catawba Road (864) Patterson Drive {669) Poage Valley Road (690) Poor Mountain Road (6I2) Rocky Road (144) Sandyridge Rd (697) Slings Gap Rd (612) Sugar Camp Creek Road (690): C't �"�" v le I Rural Preserve: A future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions are generally stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestal, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. Land Use Types: Agricultural Production - The production of crops, plants, vines, trees, livestock, poultry and eggs. Agricultural Services - Services that support agricultural production such as soil and crop preparation, veterinary services and landscape and horticultural care. Forest and Wood Products - Tree farms, forest nurseries and reforestation services. Parks and Outdoor Recreation Facilities - Large regional parks and other recreation facilities that are designed to preserve environmentally sensitive lands and protect them from more intense land uses. Rural Residential - Single-family residential generally averaging a gross density of one unit per three acres. Cluster developments are encouraged. Rural Institutional - Limited intensity uses such as religious assembly facilities and clubs serving the local rural population base. Mining and Extraction Operations - Those uses that locate according to the availability of natural resources. There are strict limitations on these industries in the Rural Preserve designation due to potentially harmful effects on housing, farming and resource protection and conservation areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where agricultural, recreational, and forestal uses are predominant and are encouraged to expand. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where agricultural zoning is in effect. RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL AREAS - Locations where limited, very low density residential and institutional uses are allowed. RESOURCE PROTECTION - Locations where valuable and irreplaceable resources such as open space, public water supply impoundments, rivers, streams, lakes, productive agricultural land, woodlands, critical slopes, ridgelines, historical and archeological sites and unique natural areas exist. ACCESS - Locations that are accessible by existing improved or unimproved rural roads and, to a lesser extent, rural arterial highways. RURAL SECTOR - Locations outside the urban service area. Terry and Lisa Cc Request to remove the existing profferE approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AV Center District with Conditions and Special Agricultural/Residential Dis Board of Supervisors Public Hi May 23, 2023 • 9744 & 9786 Tinsley Lane, 9651 Bent Mountain Road • 14.713 Acres • Current Use: Vacant • Rezoning request to remove existing proffered conditions 3 Project Site 4 Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Photograph 7 Photograph • Property rezoned from AR, Agricultural/Rey Agricultural/Village Center District with Co • Special use permit granted for a convenie • Proffered conditions require development conformance with site plan and architect 2011 rezoning. • Special use permit is still valid under Sectio Code of Virginia (extended approvals relc housing crisis and most recently the COVI[ 8 Zoning Backgr• • The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defin dwelling as: "a site built or modular building designed for or used exclusi\ permanent occupancy." • A single family dwelling is permitted by right ir Agricultural/Village Center District, and the Al District • Existing proffered conditions state developmE conformance with the site plan (and architec site plan shows a convenience store, office b school with no residential units. The proffered removed in order for the applicants to constrt 9 Zoning Backgr• �-- AWMINUM FINISH METAL ROOF SD-0' BELL TOWER — AWMINUM FINISH METAL ROOF WHITE WINDOWS DARK RED SIDING EARTH BERM ON SIDES STONE BASE - FRONT 111 11 111 ; J EO.0 sill NIL WHITE WINDOW AND DORMER PACE WHITE COLUMNS & TRW WHITE WINDOWS DARE RED SIDING AIUMI NUM FINISH METAL ROOF WHITE WINDOW AND DORMER FACE WHITE WINDOWS DARN RED SIDING pedestrian circa lUtiOn Or connection convenience Blare and office buildings. ay shall not earceed twenty {24 Nil I rnfeh the appearance and me trials el hting In the canopy shall be rscesaed I Inward Into ifs site. Rht pcles, including fixtures, shall be to height above grade, all Les black, gray or grvyieh-brawn. •u mead signs shall Os allowed far this development. be constructed to generally match the architecture ngs and shall not exceed seven (7) feet In rldlh_ These signs shall be channel IM, ground ed light source so as to to cost light onto the scent road nr propertT- Ig -,all occupy leas than fire (A) percent The m• • number of signs shall Be limited ! and located behind bu wi+h the pro -visions of Section 30— Distrtet, of the Roanoke County Zoning Dr w ayaaee - -a ,P. HISC¢-S1..en IniNx,w.M%: ie110 1E mama Al va uew veer repo 10 Existing Proffered Site Plan/ Ren „ Residential Concept Existing Zoning • AVCS • AR Surrounding Zoning • North - AV • East - AR • West - AR • South - AR 12 Zoning Rural Preserve • Rural Preserve is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. • These rural regions are generally d stable anrequire a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestall, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. • Single family dwelling is an accepteuse type at a density d of one unit per three acres. • The proposed single family dwellings are consistent with the Rural Preserve Future Land Use designation. 1 Future Land U 1 13 Public Hearing -May 2, 2023 • Three (3) citizens spoke during the public hi potential grocery store/convenience store • Concerns raised regarding a grocery store included: • Wanting limited development on Bent Mountaii • Speeding; • Will turn lanes be required on Route 221; • No need for a grocery store/convenience store • Concerns over staffing at the Bent Mountain Fir( convenience store is constructed. 14 Planning Commit • The applicant's representative discus conditions on the property and state the parcel is to build two single famill that the applicant is not asking for th permit for the convenience store to I may keep this open as an option in t that, at this time, there are no concn a convenience store and the applici pursue that without more feedback 1 15 Planning Commit • The Planning Commission clarified: • That this petition is to remove proffered conditions two single family homes; • That the special use permit for a convenience storE • That a grocery store would be classified as retail sa use permit in the AV (Agricultural / Village Center) • That a convenience store is limited in size (3,000 sop • The Planning Commission discussed that the c residential homes was consistent with the Run Designation and the County's Comprehensiv( applicants should be able to build the single 1 16 Planning Commit Planning Commission recommends request to remove the proffered co three parcels. 17 Planning Commit Question 18 I am here this evening to address the current proposal to have the zoning changed for the property purchased by the Comeroses to be changed to accommodate a grocery store. I would like to start out by saying this is not personal to the Comeroses. I have never met them. It is my understanding they do not yet live on the mountain. To visit the mountain is great but to live and interact in the community is quite special. Perhaps they were not at any of the Roanoke County 200 meetings. If they had been, they would know the community had requested little to no development and instead the community asked to protect and improve our natural resources and for things like walking trails to enjoy the natural beauty of the mountain. It was not in the 200 plan that the community wanted retail space or a grocery store. The home I share with my husband stretches from Tinsley to 221, the same as the Comerose property. I work from home and every single day I see folks biking, running, walking their dog, or walking for exercise. I have enjoyed some of the local hiking trails and never have I been on a trail when I didn't see at least one other person. This is the spirit Bent Mountain; people come for the natural resources we have to offer. We know from the pipeline how passionate Bent Mountain people are about the land, air, and water. What value would a grocery store add to any of that? That particular stretch of 221 is flat and straight and cars and motorcycles often speed through there, passing other vehicles when it's not always safe to do so. How will traffic be affected by the slow -down of vehicles turning in or of vehicles pulling out into traffic? Will this cause an additional lane to be needed? Within the limits of Bent Mountain, we already have Grateful Mountain Mercantile that sells fresh and local produce, local meats, local eggs, local breads and treats, and a variety of other local made foods. They have recently expanded to selling prepared foods for take-out. We have B&$ Market, a convenience store for grab and go items and gas. More than just a convenience store, it's also a place where some of the retired gentleman of the community can come together in the mornings and enjoy fellowship with one another while drinking coffee. We also have the Treehouse Tavern, a great restaurant we were very happy to see fill an otherwise vacant building and they have plans for continuing to make the restaurant even better. In nearby Copper Hill we have Smith's Grocery. A true country store that sells a little bit of everything, including local produce and meats and prepared food for take-out. They are a busy hub as they sell gas and are a good resource to farmers for things I'm sure I know nothing about. A few more minutes down the road is The Floyd Soup Shop. She also sells local eggs and local made food using local produce when she can. She participates in cooking and baking workshops at the Bent Mountain Center. Do we really need another source for local foods? According to Roanoke County, there are 820 people on the mountain. If a grocery store is built, how will we be able to sustain all these businesses. If we are not able to sustain them, what will it leave in the wake? Possibly one or more shuttered businesses left to fall into disrepair and just be another eyesore. Within 15 min down the mountain there are 2 Krogers; another 5 min in either direction from the Krogers are 2 Food Lions. The only purpose a grocery store on the mountain would serve would be for convenience. But people generally move to the mountain to get away from the hustle and bustle of the city, not for the convenience of retail stores. I ask that the Planning Commission and the Comerose's will carefully consider that when a grocery store has been built, a parking lot has been paved, lights turn on in the parking lot and a sign goes up, then the landscape of Bent Mountain will have been changed forever. Thank you for your time AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE REMOVING THE EXISTING PROFFERED CONDITION ON APPROXIMATELY 14.713 ACRES OF LAND ZONED AVCS (AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT) AND AR (AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT), LOCATED AT 9651 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD, 9744 TINSLEY LANE, AND 9786 TINSLEY LANE, LOCATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NOS: 103.00-02- 21.00-0000, 103.00-02-21.01-0000, AND 103.00-02-23.00-0000) WHEREAS, Terio and Lisa Comerose have filed a petition to remove a proffered condition on approximately 14.713 acres (three separate parcels) located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the said property contains the following one (1) condition imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #121311-12 adopted on December 13, 2011: (1) The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan prepared by Pierson Engineering and Surveying, dated November 28, 2011, and the architectural renderings prepared by Interactive Design Group dated July 18, 2011. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning as requested to remove the one (1) proffered condition currently existing on the property; and WHEREAS, the second reading and public hearing were held on May 23, 2023. Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning request is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan, is good zoning practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 2. Accordingly, the Board approves the rezoning request; the following condition imposed by Ordinance #121311-12 adopted on December 13, 2011 is hereby removed as follows: (1) The sitc shall be developed in substantial conformancc with the sitc plan prcparcd by Pierson Enginccring and Surveying, datcd f� oyembber 28 201 1 and �architec al renrlp gs prepar by rv�rP cry zvrr-•rn-rc� ar rc-crrrcrra"' " ' y "�rc�ur Interactive Design Group datcd July 18, 2011. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 2 of 2 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 SAMPLE MOTIONS Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS The petition of Terio and Lisa Comerose to remove the existing proffered conditions on approximately 14.713 acres of land zoned AVCS (Agricultural/Village Center District with Conditions and Special Use Permit), and AR (Agricultural/Residential District), located at 9651 Bent Mountain Road, 9744 Tinsley Lane, and 9786 Tinsley Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, and 2. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested, and remove the one proffered condition existing on the properties. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Hugo Jimenez to 1) rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) to 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District), and to 2) obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard located at 5681 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance to rezone property from commercial to industrial and to obtain a special use permit for a construction yard. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking to relocate his landscaping business from Starkey Lane to 5681 Starkey Road. Since the County's Zoning Ordinance does not have landscaping business as a separate use, the closest comparable use type in the County's Zoning Ordinance is a construction yard. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines Construction Yards as "establishments housing facilities of business primarily engaged in construction activities, including outside storage of materials and equipment. Typical uses are building contractor yards." A construction yard is only allowed as a special use in an AV (Agricultural/Village Center District) and an 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District), and as a by -right use in 1-2 (High Intensity Industrial District). Page 1 of 3 The property owner has proffered that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden Center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic. In addition to the uses listed above, the property owner proffers that a Construction Yard may be allowed on the property with an approved special use permit. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning and special use permit application on May 2, 2023. Seven (7) citizens spoke during the public hearing (6 in opposition, and 1 in support). Concerns raised included: project not being in compliance with the limited industrial use type being in an economic opportunity area under the Core Future Land Use Designation in the County's Comprehensive Plan; the flood -prone nature of the parcel does not align with the purpose statement of the 1-1 zoning district; potential increase in traffic; noise levels; pollution; stockpiling of materials in a floodplain; and the number of vehicles and equipment to be parked on the property. The property owner spoke on behalf of the applicant. She focused on the quality of work and the character of the applicant. She affirmed that the applicant has been providing services to the local community for over two decades and does not maintain any debris or landscaping materials on the premises. Furthermore, she asserted that the applicant's business, will not result in an influx of traffic, as there are no plans for expansion. The applicant outlined his intention to relocate his business, "Enchanted Lawns," to the parcel. He emphasized that despite the change in location, the fundamental nature of his business would remain largely unchanged. He also stressed that his current business premises, situated at 5123 Starkey Lane off Starkey Road, already utilizes Starkey Road, negating any substantial increase in traffic. His business is primarily engaged in landscaping, planting, demolition, and irrigation work. The applicant confirmed that he would not be storing mulch or gravel/stone on the property. He also explained that they make daily trips to the landfill to dispose of any waste generated by their operations. The Planning Commission discussed: floodplain regulations; zoning districts where a construction yard is allowed; the nature of the landscaping business; the stockpiling of materials; economic opportunity areas in the 2005 Comprehensive Plan; the purpose statement of the 1-1 Industrial District; visibility from Starkey Road; proposed buffers; and the surrounding zoning and impact of zoning this parcel 1-1. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District, to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, with the following proffered condition: Page 2 of 3 1. The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden Center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic. In addition to the uses listed above, the property owner proffers that a Construction Yard may be allowed on the property with an approved special use permit. The Planning Commission also recommends approval of the special use permit for a construction yard with one condition: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance approving the rezoning from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) to 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District), with the following proffered condition: 1. The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden Center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic. In addition to the uses listed above, the property owner proffers that a Construction Yard may be allowed on the property with an approved special use permit. Staff also recommends approving the special use permit for a construction yard with one condition: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Request: Location: Tax Parcel: Magisterial District: Proposed Proffered Condition: Suggested SUP Conditions: Hugo Jimenez Rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, and to obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard 5681 Starkey Road #087.18-01-40.00-0000 Cave Spring 1. "The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden Center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic." 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Hugo Jimenez is requesting to rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, and to obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard located at 5681 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Appropriate land use types include general retail shops and personal services, office and institutional uses, and limited industrial uses. The proposed rezoning and special use permit are in general conformance with the Core future land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines Construction Yards as "establishments housing facilities of business primarily engaged in construction activities, including outside storage of materials and equipment. Typical uses are building contractor yards." Section 30-86-2. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains the following use and design standards for Construction Yards: (A) General standards: 1. In the 1-2 district, all materials stored on the premises overnight shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from surrounding views in accordance with Section 30-92, and shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining residential district. 1 (B) In the AV district, the following standards shall apply: 1. The maintenance and repair of all vehicles and equipment shall be conducted within an enclosed building. 2. In considering a special use permit request for a construction yard, in addition to the above standards and the general standards contained in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, the board may consider and set standards for the following: a. The provisions for screening of any vehicles, equipment, materials and storage yard, and screening and buffering, in accordance with Section 30-91, of the entire construction yard. b. The maximum height of any structure and any additional setback requirements necessary to compensate for any increased height. c. Specific measures to control dust on the site. d. Specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property lines. e. Limit the hours of operation. If this land use application (rezoning and special use permit) is approved, comprehensive building and site plan review and approval is required prior to construction. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — There have been numerous land use actions on this property over the years. On March 1, 1989, there was an action taken to rezone the tract of land from R-1 to B-1 zoning classification for the purpose of office use. This rezoning included several conditions that were attached to the property (see attached Ordinance 389-6 for additional information.) On August 28, 2001, there was a change of zoning classification from C-1 Office District with conditions to C-1, Office District with conditions. This change was initiated by the application of RA -DE DIV., LTD., T/A Perfect Touch (see attached Ordinance 082801-13 for additional information.) On October 28, 2008, the existing proffered conditions were modified on the tract of land. This modification was requested by Starkey Medical and included the addition of seven proffered conditions (see attached Ordinance 102808-10 for additional information.) On February 25, 2020, there was an action taken to remove the proffered conditions on the parcel of land. The property owner requested the removal of these conditions so that the property could be redeveloped for all permitted uses in the C-1 zoned district (see attached Ordinance 022520-6 for additional information.) The property is currently not being used; however, the previous use was a language club. Topography/Vegetation — Despite its gentle slope along Starkey Road, the site is relatively flat. The southern boundary is adjacent to a small creek, with most of the site being designated as a floodway and floodplain. There is a high risk of flooding during both 100-year and 500-year flood events. Along the western property line, there is a thick, lush vegetation of trees and shrubs. In addition, there are mixed trees and shrubs surrounding the main building and parking area. Surrounding Neighborhood — To the north, northwest and west are vacant properties owned by Friendship Apartment Village Corporation and zoned C-2CS (High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions and Special Use Permit). Adjacent to these parcels to the north is Friendship Health & Rehab South which is a nursing home and life care facility. To the south is an existing single family residence zoned C-1 C (Low 2 Intensity Commercial with Conditions). Immediately located across Starkey Road are single-family residential properties, both zoned R-3 (Medium Density Multi -Family Residential). Adjoining Properties — Approximately 64 letters were mailed out to adjoining property owners. The letters contained the application information, hearing dates, and aerial map along with direct contact information for staff and instructions on how to submit comments. Comments received to date are attached to this staff report. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The property being considered currently has two existing buildings- a main building approximately 2,047 square feet in size, and a detached garage approximately 1,725 square feet in size located at the rear of the property. Currently, the site has six parking spaces. The proposed concept plan shows the addition of a 50-foot long evergreen tree buffer along a portion of its Starkey Road frontage. Additionally, the concept plan includes the use of crushed gravel paving towards the rear of the site, supplemented by a 10-foot wide crushed gravel access drive tie-in that connects with the existing gravel access towards the northeast section of the property. Furthermore, the concept plan clearly identifies the location of commercial vehicle parking on the site, ensuring compliance with relevant zoning ordinances. Per the concept plan, the existing free-standing sign shall remain in use with a new 7-foot x 4-foot sign panel. It is worth noting that there are no plans for additional lighting on the property. Notably, the proposed concept plan does not entail any alterations to established structures or any new construction, therefore ensuring the conservation of the current site conditions while implementing the proposed enhancements. Access/Traffic Circulation — The subject site is located off Starkey Road. There are two existing access drives for the property, both of which are off Starkey Road. The main entrance is a paved asphalt road that runs through the middle of the site. A secondary entrance is a crushed gravel access, which is located in the northeast corner of the property. Screening & Buffering —A type B buffer would be required wherever 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District adjoins a C-1, Low Density Commercial District (southern property line). A type B buffer can consist of either of the following options: Option 1: A 30-foot buffer. For every 100 feet consisting of one row of large evergreen trees (5), one row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18), and one row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24) Option 2: A 20-foot buffer. For every 100 feet consisting of one row of large deciduous trees (3), one row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18), one row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24), and six-foot screening. Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety — All construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Any Building Code changes of use will need to meet all requirements as well. Fire and Rescue — Fire and Rescue does not object to the project and it will not increase the services we provide. If any of the structures are considered a building code change of use, fire flow, and access requirements may apply. 3 General Services — I have reviewed this request and do not see any issues, nor do I have comments, for General Services. Roanoke County Stormwater — Please be aware that in accordance with Section 30-74 FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance: 1. Any change to the referenced property within the flood boundary will require a floodplain permit. 2. All trucks and trailers must be operative to remove prior to flooding. Flash flooding is more of a concern in this watershed verses the Roanoke River. 3. Stockpiling of materials in the Floodway is prohibited. VDOT — "We have reviewed the above -mentioned rezoning and special use request and have the following comments:" 1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right -of way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes, but is not limited to, commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3. Trip generation calculations will be required for this development with the first plan submittal, as well as right and left turn lane warrant calculations. 4. The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. Roanoke County Transportation- Transportation comments on this case are as follows: Starkey Road in this location is included in the RVARC Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan. This portion is included in the high priority recommendation for sidewalk along Starkey Road from Hunting Hills Drive to Merriman Road. Please see the attached excerpts for more information. A roundabout is under construction at the intersection of Starkey Road and Buck Mountain Road. Sidewalks are included with this project along the frontage of 5701 Starkey Road. While we would appreciate construction of sidewalk along the frontage of the subject parcel, we understand that it would require a bridge over the Back Creek tributary which makes it likely infeasible. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Appropriate land use types include general retail shops and personal services, office and institutional uses, and limited industrial uses. The proposed rezoning and special use permit are in general conformance with the Core future land use designation. 4 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Hugo Jimenez is requesting to rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, and to obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard located at 5681 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Core. The proposed rezoning and special use permit are in general conformance with the Core future land use designation. The applicant, Hugo Jimenez, has submitted the following proffered condition (signed by the property owner): 1. The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden Center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed project, staff has suggested the following condition for the special use permit: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: 7-5/2023 Lionel Cruz -Cruz PC: 512123 Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Floodplain, Zoning, FLU) C-1 Zoning District Standards 1-1 Zoning District Standards Floodplain Overlay District Standards Ordinance 389-6 Ordinance 082801-13 Ordinance 102808-10 Ordinance 022520-6 Core Future Land Designation Transportation Comments Public Comments BOS: 05/23/23 5 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P0Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date re l /.....3CI :DI Rece i AP 1elonf •50 r` � a-la3 Placards issued: 1305 d..% ..3 ,3 Case Number -1 — 5 / 215-7.7,2 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) it<Rezoning3siSpecial Use o Variance ri Waiver o Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (1S.2-2232) Review Applic nts name/address w/zip Phone: �� 03a Pi 2- t 1f i'S� n G Ce1I #: 5110 cO I /- C`/ /3 e&co- aeiDk'� d Email: MctjThu 790hmfrna•i Caf'i C1ttS+Eorl VA. 2c44$4 Contact for Legal Ads /-iv/Sc) `rimeoC'Z Owner's name/address wlzip phone #: e iL �lt�F \OC"t t'`lCtl1e Cell#: 5YC '3/`1- Cgc-f3 eL� 1.,,, t,.f 11 !AY -eel- Email:/��-Jl it u] f3" ED.'G, m,70;, -eo,---p .berm V ci 15 3 Location Property6,E3 5 tom, E3! 5`T 14 e, e7 X C om}© op Oft C- V V Zc-f o , FS Magisterial District: C aif ,Sp R i ao C-r Community Planning area: Cn \ e, S p ( F;,3 0, Tax Map No.: Q p • , ( .©/ , eta.. �1 • Lab (5 C� } 1 Existing Zoning: C — Size ofparcel(s): Acres: L.::::'. 4,1 ACie 5 Existing Land Use: / AG cciA6 6. C%UB REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEWI APPLICANTS (RJS/WICP) Proposed Zoning: C 0 Y) S'�'r -I c - l o't , Vvir d -L ! - .' W/SU f Proposed Land Use: - — Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements ofthe requested district? 3 -1 63:l''i Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). S? C-; h0 Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes % No (.)-` IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST ,'a12---h- ' I - If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes X No _ . 00 S f RU c.-11(;1;J VARIANCE, WAIVER AND AYMINLRRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordi .., ,, Er' r Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to 61 Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County + . • u Ordina' Appeal of interpretation of Zoning Map to of r'.? a a ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE RIS/W/CP WA& }t/S/W/CP V/AA RJS/W/CP VIAA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11"concept plan Applicat�+: Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, ifapp 1C. Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the l<iiowledge and consent I'the owner. Owner's Signature 7 Application Requirements Consultation with the County Planning staff to review the feasibility of the proposal and to obtain recommended procedures and technical assistance. Applicant is encouraged to contact adjoining property owners to inform them of the proposal. Application must be legible and signed by property owner, contract purchaser, or owner's agent. Justification stating in general terms the change in use of the property, the effect of the changes on the surrounding area, the reasons for the request, the consistency of the request with the Community Plan, and the consistency of the request with the general purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose stated at the beginning of the applicable district regulations. Concept Plan of the proposed project and the concept plan checklist must be submitted with the applications. Plan must be 8.5" x 1 1 ". Metes and bounds description must accompany rezoning application. Water and sewer application and planimetric maps must accompany rezoning and special use permit application, if applicable. List of adjoining property owners including owner's names, addresses (mailing address including zip code) and tax map numbers of all adjoining properties and those directly across any public right-of-way must accompany application, including those in adjacent jurisdictions. Refer to tax records in the County Assessor's office. Application fees must accompany application and are as follows: Rezoning — Agri/Single/Two Rezoning — Multi -family ezoning — Industrial Rezoning — Commercial Land Use Plan Amendment Special Use B Landfill �pecial Use B Other Variance Waiver Administrative Appeal .. 'echnology Fee $415 + $20/acre or portion thereof $860 + $25/acre or portion thereof $8442+ $30/acre or portion thereof $945 + $32/acre or portion thereof $710 $1,875 $19 $190 $275 on all permit issuing fees In addition, the applicant must pay legal advertisement fees. Staff will prepare ad for the applicant and deliver ad to The Roanoke Times. The applicant will be billed by The Roanoke Times for the ad. Please include email and phone number Public Hearing Notices must be posted at clearly visible locations along the street frontage or property lines of the subject property. Notices will be issued by Planning & Zoning following receipt of the completed application. For r1hcr, information or assistance, please contact: Department of Planning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone (540) 772-2068 - Fax (540)776-7155 E-Mail: planning(7a,roanokecountyva.gov All required items must be submitted before the application deadline. 1 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant 0 1-Ao,r1ivelie 2 2-we Inez The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determinethe need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible, Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classi cation in the oning Ordinance. Lal)d I5 orr ed N C-IC +0 he SoV•1i1 C.- V acctr14 4m. he No(4dh, I ?rope, 3 +0 * wre eciz4 . Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. 3~l h S De 5 i rrc ecl a. S u uTe LCkVVd - u u re \cn k%t c reo` l)a�ere j S �'ti .eNi l -amen IS ercoura9ece ta nd U j r-thrn CO re atets fV ar Para Ile4 * cev'14r^ck C bog rserr s c Ream:Are,SoIev1 Vri4oti Corc CAY trek. al COW 0,?propric or lay cjese .otciy a("1+jrrra( Ue.s aAd i'etto'r' l !�, — b ctseck p i c t I ill el Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services apd facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. -�)M kxv u , Be3e1) St inn I (00(1 .+0 now Lor * h + e cep' t M (' vtICa r q.01 loovael Wook Se oi. t Qc1 .S S h00 1 , ?av .5 e Vc. Sho rlD Nc be IY1pled o c. 7) e t 0-41 S- rock- rt s u w Val uvvkle -\faC1 L nAck ; e.YNA pfr j c 3 3 CONCEPT PLAN CJIECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensuu-e compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A. concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signae of applicant 03- 0 Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Name of Petition ,14 3 d v. Petitioner's Signature lO ° Z Date Effective date;. April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive -through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc, (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date; April 19,2005 7 ' ADJACENT PROPERTY 0 Friendship Apartment Village G2 G5 i Leaf Box <1 Leaf Box Troller Trailer Existing >- Trailer Concrete Pad c„; `"-A Trailer N Troller Troller Troller Trailer Troller PROPOSED CON NEW CRUSHED GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE TIE-IN (}IO' wide} CLEAR BRUSH AT BACK RIGHT PROPERTY CORNER FOR VE- HICLE PARKING (screened) —NEW CRUSHED GRAVEL PAVING FOR VEHICLE PARKING/ACCESS GARAGE (±SO'x30°' size) Indoor Storage: Small Tools Mulch Blower Air Compressor Icemelt 0 Pick-up/ Troller Pick-up/ Troller Pick-up Trucks Pumptruck — Approximate Property Lin/ (per Roanoke County G.I online tax mapping information •-.I�iIIIt� • 1 • :• 4 V Pick-up Trucks e o Dum truck xi.6tirig Ash p / ' (kith b Gnrlc Dumptrurk_ • . t WNv . : b :EIE'LOYE�"f'Q -NNW GRf HEI? &RAV1 L-.PAYING: : ....FORVEFHCLE PARKING/ACC 55:: -y; 'C,LEAf' BRUSH AT BACK OF ' • • ...•PRC1f?ER'1Y.GORNER FOR V'E- • •• ; fl GL• E PARKING (screened) ADJAGEN1 5bc5 Starkey Roc Uyen Ng C H',PTUAL PLAN: Intended Site Use (prepared PROFFER STATEMENT Applicant: Hugo Jimenez Property Owner: Michele Meinhart Magisterial District: Cave Spring Tax Map Parcel: 087.18-01-40.00-0000 Property Address: 5681 Starkey Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 Acreage: Approximately 1.24 acres "Pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, and Section 30-15 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and subject to the Board of Supervisors' approval of Hugo Jimenez"s request to rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C- 1 Low Intensity Commercial District to 1-1 Low Intensity Industrial District hereby offers the following proffered condition: 1. "The property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: General Office, Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, Communication Services, Garden center, Personal Improvement Services, and Veterinary Hospital/Clinic." Owner's Signature 46. r4 ;a Printed Name Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Aerial Map Hugo Jimenez 5681 Starky Rd 087.18-01-40.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.24 Existing Zoning: Cl Proposed Zoning: 1-1 Proposed SUP for Construction Yard Magisterial District: Cave Spring Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 d ROANOKE Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 3/22/2023 1:1,128 \Roanoke County, Va 2022, Roanoke Cot Geographics, and the GIS User Commun Flood Plain Map 500 year Floodplain Flood Plain Floodway Not in Flood Plain I Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 ROANOKE Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 4 /2 0/2 02 3 1:2 , 2 5 7 Roanoke County :Virginia 2019 FLU Map Hugo Jimenez 5681 Starky Rd 087.18-01-40.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.24 Existing Zoning: Cl Proposed Zoning: 1-1 Proposed SUP for Construction Yard Magisterial District: Cave Spring Future Land Use Neighborhood Conservation Transition Core I I Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 41 R©ANORE 0 70 140 Date: 3/22/2023 Feet 280 1:2,257 0 m cP G 577 ®5745 \_\5733 5 904 568( 569'6 1f'1! 11A 471 4715 i 4711 196 IVY GREEN Cr Roanoke County, Virginia 2019 Zoning Map Hugo Jimenez 5681 Starky Rd 087.18-01-40.00-0000 Lot Size: 1.24 Existing Zoning: Cl Proposed Zoning: I-1 Proposed SUP for Construction Yard Magisterial District: Cave Spring Zoning C1 C2 R1 R3 Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. ROANOKE VA Roanoke VA 24018 FLAN.. Feet 0 35 70 140 Date: 3/22/2023 1:1,128 SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-53-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the C-1 low intensity commercial district is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county -wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office and commercial development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office and commercial uses. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -family Dwelling * Two-family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas * (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 1 of 4 Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Bed and Breakfast * Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Communications Services Consumer Repair Services Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Short -Term Rental * Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 2. Office Uses Laboratories 3. Commercial Uses Automobile Rental/Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 2 of 4 Retail Sales 4. Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble * Recycling Centers and Stations * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, § 1, 4-22-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-53-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one (1) street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two (2) feet (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 3 of 4 for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 4 of 4 SEC. 30-61. 1-1 LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-61-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the 1-1, low intensity industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service area which are suitable for less intensive industrial activities. These areas are primarily designated based on the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from flooding, as well as the availability of adequate sewer and water capacity, access to arterial road network, and proximity to rail and airport facilities or the interstate highway system. This district generally coincides with the recommendations for the principal industrial land use category contained in the comprehensive plan, and particularly those areas unsuitable for more intensive or potentially hazardous industrial uses. Distributing these areas around the county in a planned manner to create employment centers within close proximity to residential growth areas and reduce heavy traffic generation of industrial uses is encouraged. Since land with suitable characteristics for less intensive industrial development is limited in the county, a high degree of protection is promoted where industrial development is located adjacent to existing or future residential areas. The conversion and/or redevelopment of existing non -conforming uses in this district which are unrelated to industrial needs is also encouraged. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture Agritourism * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Day Care Center * Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Maintenance and Service Facilities Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services Utility Services, Major * Utility Services, Minor Guidance Services 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 1 of 4 General Office Laboratories Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Communication Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Equipment Sales and Rental * Garden Center * Laundry Personal Improvement Services Restaurant, General Retail Sales Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Recycling Centers and Stations * Transportation Terminal Truck Terminal Warehousing and Distribution 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * Wind Energy System, Small * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 2 of 4 1. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership * Automobile Rental/Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Gasoline Station * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini -warehouse * Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 2. Industrial Uses Composting * Construction Yards * Resource Extraction * Transfer Station * 3. Miscellaneous Uses Aviation Facilities, Private * Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * Wind Energy System, Large * Wind Energy System, Utility * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042297, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 082807- 18, § 1, 8-28-07; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24- 11; Ord. No. 091311-7 , § 1, 9-13-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord No. 092215-9 , § 1, 9-22-15; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 062717-4 , § 1, 6-27-17; Ord. No. 072721-8 , § 1, 7-27-21) Sec. 30-61-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 3 of 4 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: behind front building line and 3 feet from side line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. All structures: When adjoining property zoned residential, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required side and/or rear yard adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 9, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:14 [EST] Page 4 of 4 SEC. 30-74. FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT.' Sec. 30-74-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the Floodplain Overlay (FO) District is to provide mandatory floodplain restrictions for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) compliance. The purpose of these floodplain provisions is to prevent the following: 1. The loss of life, health or property; 2. The creation of health and safety hazards; 3. The disruption of commerce and governmental services; 4. The extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief; and 5. The impairment of the tax base. (B) These provisions are designed to accomplish the above purposes by: 1. Regulating uses, activities, and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities, and development, will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities, and frequencies; 2. Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities, and development from locating within areas subject to flooding; 3. Requiring all those uses, activities, and developments that do occur in flood -prone areas to be protected and/or flood -proofed against flooding and flood damage; and 4. Protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-2. Applicability and Administration. (A) These provisions shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Roanoke County and identified as special flood hazard areas (SFHAs), shown on the flood insurance rate map (FIRM) or included in the flood insurance study (FIS) provided to Roanoke County by FEMA. (B) These provisions shall supersede any regulations currently in effect in floodplain areas. Where conflict exists between these provisions and those of any underlying zoning district, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. 'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, adopted September 8, 2020, in effect, repealed § 30-74, §§ 30-74-1- 30-74-13 and enacted a new § 30-74 as set out herein. Former § 30-74 pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 92893-18, § 1, adopted September 28, 1993; Ord. No. 42694-12, §§ 10, 11, adopted April 26, 1994; Ord. No. 92695-18, § 1, adopted September 26, 1995; Ord. No. 042799-11, §§ lc., lf, adopted April 27, 1999; Ord. No. 012505-4, § 1, adopted January 25, 2005; and Ord. No. 082807-19, § 1, adopted August 28, 2007. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 1 of 15 (C) In the event any provision concerning a floodplain area is declared inapplicable as a result of any legislative or administrative actions or judicial discretion, the basic underlying zoning district provisions shall remain applicable. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-3. Compliance. (A) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated, constructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compliance with the terms and provisions of this section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. (B) The degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this section is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on acceptable engineering methods of study, but does not imply total flood protection. Larger floods may occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. This section does not imply that areas outside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such areas, will be free from flooding or flood damages. (C) This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke County or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance shall be declared invalid for any reason whatever, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. The remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect; and for this purpose, the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-5. Designation of the Floodplain Administrator. The county administrator shall designate the floodplain administrator for Roanoke County. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-6. Duties and Responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator. The duties and responsibilities of the floodplain administrator shall include but are not limited to: (A) Review applications for permits to determine whether proposed activities will be located in the special flood hazard area (SFHA). (B) Interpret floodplain boundaries and provide available base flood elevation and flood hazard information. (C) Review applications to determine whether proposed activities will be reasonably safe from flooding and require new construction and substantial improvements to meet the requirements of these regulations. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 2 of 15 (D) Review applications to determine whether all necessary permits have been obtained from the federal, state or local agencies from which prior or concurrent approval is required; in particular, permits from state agencies for any construction, reconstruction, repair, or alteration of a dam, reservoir, or waterway obstruction (including bridges, culverts, structures), any alteration of a watercourse, or any change of the course, current, or cross section of a stream or body of water, including any change to the one hundred -year frequency floodplain of free -flowing non -tidal waters of the state. (E) Verify that applicants proposing an alteration of a watercourse have notified adjacent communities, the Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management), and other appropriate agencies (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)) and have submitted copies of such notifications to FEMA. (F) Approve applications and issue permits to develop in flood hazard areas if the provisions of these regulations have been met, or disapprove applications if the provisions of these regulations have not been met. (G) Inspect or cause to be inspected, buildings, structures, and other development for which permits have been issued to determine compliance with these regulations or to determine if non-compliance has occurred or violations have been committed. (H) Review elevation certificates and require incomplete or deficient certificates to be corrected. (I) Submit to FEMA, or require applicants to submit to FEMA, data and information necessary to maintain the FIRM, including hydrologic and hydraulic engineering analyses prepared by or for Roanoke County, within six (6) months after such data and information becomes available if the analyses indicate changes in base flood elevations. (J) Maintain and permanently keep records that are necessary for the administration of these regulations, including: 1. Flood insurance studies, flood insurance rate maps (including historic studies and maps and current effective studies and maps) and letters of map change (LOMC); and 2. Documentation supporting issuance and denial of permits, elevation certificates, documentation of the elevation (in relation to the datum on the FIRM) to which structures have been flood - proofed, inspection records, other required design certifications, variances, and records of enforcement actions taken to correct violations of these regulations. (K) Enforce the provisions of these regulations, investigate violations, issue notices of violations or stop work orders and require permit holders to take corrective action. (L) Advise the board of zoning appeals (BZA) regarding the intent of these regulations and, for each application for a variance, prepare a staff report and recommendation. (M) Administer the requirements related to proposed work on existing buildings: 1. Make determinations in consultation with the building official as to whether buildings and structures that are located in flood hazard areas and that are damaged by any cause have been substantially damaged. 2. Make reasonable efforts to notify owners of substantially damaged structures of the need to obtain a permit to repair, rehabilitate, or reconstruct. Prohibit the non -compliant repair of substantially damaged buildings except for temporary emergency protective measures necessary to secure a property or stabilize a building or structure to prevent additional damage. (N) Undertake other actions which may include but are not limited to: issuing press releases, public service announcements, and other public information materials related to permit requests and repair of damaged structures; coordinating with other federal, state, and local agencies to assist with substantial (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 3 of 15 damage determinations; providing owners of damaged structures information related to the proper repair of damaged structures in special flood hazard areas; and assisting property owners with documentation necessary to file claims for increased cost of compliance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) flood insurance policies. (0) Notify FEMA when the corporate boundaries of Roanoke County have been modified and: 1. Provide a map that clearly delineates the new corporate boundaries or the new area for which the authority to regulate pursuant to these regulations has either been assumed or relinquished through annexation; and 2. If the FIRM for any annexed area includes special flood hazard areas that have flood zones that have regulatory requirements that are not set forth in these regulations, prepare amendments to these regulations to adopt the FIRM and appropriate requirements, and submit the amendments to the governing body for adoption; such adoption shall take place at the same time as or prior to the date of annexation and a copy of the amended regulations shall be provided to Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management) and FEMA. Upon the request of FEMA, complete and submit a report concerning participation in the NFIP which may request information regarding the number of buildings in the SFHA, number of permits issued for development in the SFHA, and number of variances issued for development in the SFHA. It is the duty of the floodplain administrator to take into account flood, mudslide and flood -related erosion hazards, to the extent that they are known, in all official actions relating to land management and use throughout the entire jurisdictional area of the community, whether or not those hazards have been specifically delineated geographically (e.g. via mapping or surveying). (P) (Q) (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-7. Use and Interpretation of FIRMS. The floodplain administrator shall make interpretations, where needed, as to the exact location of SFHAs, floodplain boundaries, and floodway boundaries. The following shall apply to the use and interpretation of FIRMs and data: (A) Where field surveyed topography indicates that adjacent ground elevations: 1. Are below the base flood elevation in riverine SFHAs, even in areas not delineated as a special flood hazard area on a FIRM, the area shall be considered as SFHA and subject to the requirements of these regulations; 2. Are above the base flood elevation and the area is labelled as a SFHA on the FIRM, the area shall be regulated as SFHA unless the applicant obtains a letter of map change that removes the area from the SFHA. (B) In FEMA-identified SFHAs where base flood elevation and floodway data have not been identified and in areas where FEMA has not identified SFHAs, any other flood hazard data available from a federal, state, or other source shall be reviewed and reasonably used. (C) Base flood elevations and designated floodway boundaries on the FIRM and in the FIS shall take precedence over base flood elevations and floodway boundaries by any other sources if such sources show reduced floodway widths and/or lower base flood elevations. (D) Other sources of data shall be reasonably used if such sources show increased base flood elevations and/or larger floodway areas than are shown on the FIRM and in the FIS. (E) If a preliminary FIRM and/or a preliminary FIS has been provided by FEMA: (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 4 of 15 1. Upon the issuance of a letter of final determination by FEMA, the preliminary flood hazard data shall be used and shall replace the flood hazard data previously provided from FEMA for the purposes of administering these regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of a letter of final determination by FEMA, the use of preliminary flood hazard data shall be deemed the best available data pursuant to Section 30-74-8(A)3 and used where no base flood elevations and/or floodway areas are provided on the effective FIRM. 3. Prior to issuance of a letter of final determination by FEMA, the use of preliminary flood hazard data is permitted where the preliminary base flood elevations or floodway areas exceed the base flood elevations and/or designated floodway widths in existing flood hazard data provided by FEMA. Such preliminary data may be subject to change and/or appeal to FEMA. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-8. Delineation of Areas. (A) The various special flood hazard areas shall include the SFHAs. The basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the FIS and the FIRM for Roanoke County prepared by FEMA, dated September 28, 2007, as amended, and any subsequent revisions or amendments thereto. Roanoke County may identify and regulate local flood hazard and ponding areas that are not delineated on the FIRM. These areas may be noted on a "Local Flood Hazard Map" using the best available topographic data and locally derived information such as flood of record, historic high water marks or approximate study methodologies. The boundaries of the SFHAs are established as shown on the FIRM which is declared to be a part of this ordinance and which shall be kept on file at the Roanoke County offices. These areas are more specifically defined as follows: 1. The floodway is part of an AE Zone and is delineated, for purposes of this section, using the criteria that a certain area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one percent annual chance flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any point. These floodways are specifically defined in Table 5 of the above referenced FIS and shown on the accompanying FIRM. The following provisions shall apply within the floodway of an AE zone: a. Within any floodway area, no encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, or other development shall be permitted unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analysis performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly reflect currently -accepted technical concepts. Studies, analyses, computations and other required information shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the floodplain administrator. Development activities which increase the water surface elevation of the base flood may be allowed, provided that the applicant first applies —with Roanoke County's endorsement —for a conditional letter of map revision (CLOMR), and receives the approval of the FEMA. Once approved by FEMA, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Sections 30-74-13 and 30-74-15. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 5 of 15 b. The placement of manufactured homes (mobile homes) is prohibited, except in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision. A replacement manufactured home may be placed on a lot in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision provided the anchoring, elevation, and encroachment standards are met. 2. The AE or AH Zones that are designated as AE or AH Zones on the FIRM accompanying the FIS shall be the areas for which one percent annual chance flood elevations have been provided and the floodway has not been delineated. The following provisions shall apply within an AE or AH zone where FEMA has provided base flood elevations: a. Until a regulatory floodway is designated, no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within the SFHA, designated as Zones AE or AH on the FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within Roanoke County. Development activities in Zones AE or AH on the County of Roanoke's FIRM which increase the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than one foot may be allowed, provided that the applicant first applies —with Roanoke County's endorsement —for a CLOMR, and receives the approval of FEMA. 3. The A Zone, or approximated floodplain, on the FIRM accompanying the FIS, shall be those floodplain areas for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided, but the one percent annual chance floodplain boundary has been approximated, and all other floodplain areas where the drainage area is greater than one hundred (100) acres. For these areas, the following provisions shall apply: a. The base flood elevations and floodway information from federal, state, and other acceptable sources shall be used, when available. Where the specific one percent annual chance flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data, such as the USACE Floodplain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood -Prone Quadrangles, and similar sources, then the applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this base flood elevation. For development proposed in the approximate floodplain the applicant must use technical methods that correctly reflect currently accepted practices, such as point on boundary, high water marks, or detailed methodologies hydrologic and hydraulic analyses. Studies, analyses, computations, and other information shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the floodplain administrator. b. The floodplain administrator reserves the right to require a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for any development. When such base flood elevation data is utilized, the lowest floor shall be elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches for non-residential structures and twenty-four (24) inches for residential structures. c. During the permitting process, the floodplain administrator shall obtain: i. The elevation of the lowest floor (in relation to mean sea level), including the basement, of all new and substantially improved structures; and, ii. If the structure has been flood -proofed in accordance with the requirements of Section 30- 74, the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure has been flood - proofed. Base flood elevation data shall be obtained from other sources or developed using detailed methodologies comparable to those contained in a FIS for subdivision proposals and other proposed development proposals (including manufactured home parks and subdivisions) that exceed fifty (50) lots or five (5) acres, whichever is the lesser. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 6 of 15 4. The AO Zone, shall be those areas of shallow flooding identified as AO on the FIRM accompanying the FIS. For these areas, the following provisions shall apply: a. All new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the flood depth specified on the FIRM, above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM. If no flood depth number is specified, the lowest floor, including basement, shall be elevated no less than two (2) feet above the highest adjacent grade. b. All new construction and substantial improvements of non-residential structures shall: i. Have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the flood depth specified on the FIRM, above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM. If no flood depth number is specified, the lowest floor, including basement, shall be elevated at least two (2) feet above the highest adjacent grade; or, ii. Together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities be completely flood -proofed to the specified flood level so that any space below that level is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. c. Adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes shall be provided to guide floodwaters around and away from proposed structures. (B) The mapped floodplain, includes all of the above regions and also the regions designated as having a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding on any flood map or flood insurance study. In this area, no new emergency service, medical service, or governmental records storage shall be allowed except through the variance process. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-9. Creation of Overlay. (A) The floodplain areas described above shall be an overlay to the existing underlying zoning districts as shown on the official zoning map, and as such, the provisions for the floodplain areas shall serve as a supplement to the underlying zoning district provisions. (B) The boundaries of the floodplain areas are established as shown on the FIRM which is declared to be part of this chapter and which shall be kept on file in the office of the floodplain administrator. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-10. Floodplain Boundary Changes and Interpretation. (A) In regards to jurisdictional boundary changes, the county floodplain ordinance in effect on the date of annexation shall remain in effect and shall be enforced by the municipality for all annexed areas until the municipality adopts and enforces an ordinance which meets the requirements for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. Municipalities with existing floodplain ordinances shall pass a resolution acknowledging and accepting responsibility for enforcing floodplain ordinance standards prior to annexation of any area containing identified flood hazards. If the FIRM for any annexed area includes special flood hazard areas that have flood zones that have regulatory requirements that are not set forth in these regulations, prepare amendments to these regulations to adopt the FIRM and appropriate requirements, and submit the amendments to the governing body for adoption; such adoption shall take place at the same time (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 7 of 15 as or prior to the date of annexation and a copy of the amended regulations shall be provided to Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management) and FEMA. In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44 Subpart (B) Section 59.22(a)(9)(v) all NFIP participating communities must notify the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) and optionally the State Coordinating Office in writing whenever the boundaries of the community have been modified by annexation or the community has otherwise assumed or no longer has authority to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations for a particular area. In order that the FIRM accurately represent the community's boundaries, a copy of a map of the community suitable for reproduction, clearly delineating the new corporate limits or new area for which the community has assumed or relinquished floodplain management regulatory authority must be included with the notification. (B) The delineation of any of the floodplain areas may be revised by Roanoke County where natural or man- made changes have occurred and/or where more detailed studies have been conducted or undertaken by USACE or other qualified agency, or an individual documents the need for such change. However, prior to any such change, approval must be obtained from FEMA. A completed LOMR is a record of this approval. (C) Initial interpretations of the boundaries of the floodplain areas shall be made by the floodplain administrator. Should a dispute arise concerning the boundaries of any of the floodplain areas, the BZA shall make the necessary determination. The person questioning or contesting the location of the floodplain area boundary shall be given an opportunity to present his case to the BZA and to submit technical evidence. Procedures for such appeals shall be as outlined in Section 30-24 of this ordinance. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-11. Submitting Model Backed Technical Data. A community's base flood elevations may increase or decrease resulting from physical changes affecting flooding conditions. As soon as practicable, but not later than six (6) months after the date such information becomes available, a community shall notify FEMA of the changes by submitting technical or scientific data. Such a submission is necessary so that upon confirmation of those physical changes affecting flooding conditions, risk premium rates and floodplain management requirements will be based upon current data. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-12. Letters of Map Revision (LOMR). (A) When development in the floodplain will cause or causes a change in the base flood elevation, the applicant, including state agencies, must notify FEMA by applying for a CLOMR and then a LOMR. Example cases may include, but not be limited to: 1. Any development within the floodway that causes a rise in the base flood elevations. 2. Any development occurring in Zones A1-30 and AE without a designated floodway, which will cause a rise of more than one foot in the base flood elevation. 3. Alteration or relocation of a stream (including, but not limited to, installing culverts and bridges) 44 Code of Federal Regulations §65.3 and §65.6(a)(12). (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 8 of 15 Sec. 30-74-13. Floodplain Area Provisions, Generally. (A) All uses, activities, and development occurring within any floodplain area, including placement of manufactured homes, shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a permit. Such development shall be undertaken only in strict compliance with the provisions of this section and with all other applicable codes and ordinances such as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (VA USBC) and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the floodplain administrator shall require all applications to include compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and shall review all sites to assure they are reasonably safe from flooding. Under no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or development adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways or any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. (B) All applications for development in the floodplain district and all building permits issued for the floodplain shall incorporate the following information: 1. For structures to be elevated, the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement). 2. For structures to be flood -proofed (non-residential only), the elevation to which the structure will be flood -proofed. 3. The elevation of the base flood at the site. 4. Topographic information showing existing and proposed ground elevations. (C) For all new subdivisions which adjoin or include floodplain areas identified in the FIS, the base flood elevation shall be shown on the final record plat. (D) The following provisions shall apply to all permits: 1. New construction and substantial improvements shall be built according to Section 30-74-8 of this ordinance and the VA USBC, and anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure. 2. Manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This standard shall be in addition to and consistent with applicable state anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. 3. New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. 4. New construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage. 5. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment and other service facilities, including duct work, shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 6. New and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system. 7. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters. 8. On -site waste disposal systems shall be located and constructed to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 9 of 15 9. Prior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels or of any watercourse, stream, or other water feature, within this jurisdiction a permit shall be obtained from the USACE, the VADEQ, and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (a joint permit application is available from any of these organizations). Furthermore, in riverine areas, notification of the proposal shall be given by the applicant to all affected adjacent jurisdictions, the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (Division of Dam Safety and Floodplain Management), other required agencies, and FEMA. 10. The flood carrying capacity within an altered or relocated portion of any watercourse shall be maintained. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-14. Floodway Development Regulations. (A) In the floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such development on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements which have been approved by all appropriate authorities as required above. (B) The placement of any manufactured home, except in an existing manufactured home park within the floodway is specifically prohibited. (C) In the floodway, the following uses, types and activities are permitted provided that (1) they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying zoning district, (2) are not prohibited by any other ordinance and (3) no specific land use requires any type of structure, fill, or storage of materials and equipment: 1. Agricultural; 2. Public parks and recreational areas; 3. Outdoor sports and recreation; 4. Golf courses; 5. Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas; 6. Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as, but not limited to, yard areas, parking and loading areas, and airport landing strips. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-15. Elevation and Construction Standards. In all identified flood hazard areas where base flood elevations have been provided in the FIS or generated by a certified professional in accordance with Section 30-74-8, the following provisions shall apply: (A) Residential construction. New construction or substantial improvement of any residential structure (including manufactured homes) in Zones AE, AH and A with detailed base flood elevations shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood level plus twenty-four (24) inches. Equipment or mechanical items for all residential buildings constructed, substantially improved, and/or reconstructed due to substantial damage shall be elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches. (B) Non-residential construction. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 10 of 15 1. New construction or substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or non-residential building (or manufactured home) shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood level plus twelve (12) inches. 2. Non-residential buildings located in all AE, and AH zones may be flood -proofed in lieu of being elevated provided that all areas of the building components below the elevation corresponding to the BFE plus two (2) feet are water tight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water, and use structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effect of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certification, including the specific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structures are flood -proofed, shall be maintained by the floodplain administrator. (C) Space below the lowest floor. In zones A, AE, AH, and AO, fully enclosed areas, of new construction or substantially improved structures, which are below the regulatory flood protection elevation shall: 1. Not be designed or used for human habitation, but shall be used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or limited storage of maintenance equipment used in connection with the premises. Access to the enclosed area shall be the minimum necessary to allow for parking of vehicles (garage door) or limited storage of maintenance equipment (standard exterior door), or entry to the living area (stairway or elevator); 2. Be constructed entirely of flood resistant materials below the regulatory flood protection elevation; 3. Include measures to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. To meet this requirement, the openings must either be certified by a professional engineer or architect or meet the following minimum design criteria: a. Provide a minimum of two (2) openings on different sides of each enclosed area subject to flooding. b. The total net area of all openings must be at least one square inch for each square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. c. If a building has more than one enclosed area, each area must have openings to allow floodwaters to automatically enter and exit. d. The bottom of all required openings shall be no higher than one foot above the adjacent grade. e. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other opening coverings or devices, provided they permit the automatic flow of floodwaters in both directions. f. Foundation enclosures made of flexible skirting are not considered enclosures for regulatory purposes, and, therefore, do not require openings. Masonry or wood underpinning, regardless of structural status, is considered an enclosure and requires openings as outlined above. (D) Accessory structures. Accessory structures in the SFHA shall comply with the elevation requirements and other requirements of 30-74-15(B) or, if not elevated or dry flood -proofed, shall: 1. Not be used for human habitation; 2. Be limited to no more than six hundred (600) square feet in total floor area; 3. Be useable only for parking of vehicles or limited storage; 4. Be constructed with flood damage -resistant materials below the base flood elevation; (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 11 of 15 5. Be constructed and placed to offer the minimum resistance to the flow of floodwaters; 6. Be anchored to prevent flotation; 7. Have electrical service and mechanical equipment elevated to or above the base flood elevation; 8. Shall be provided with flood openings which shall meet the following criteria: a. There shall be a minimum of two (2) flood openings on different sides of each enclosed area; if a building has more than one enclosure below the lowest floor, each such enclosure shall have flood openings on exterior walls. b. The total net area of all flood openings shall be at least one square inch for each square foot of enclosed area (non -engineered flood openings), or the flood openings shall be engineered flood openings that are designed and certified by a licensed professional engineer to automatically allow entry and exit of floodwaters; the certification requirement may be satisfied by an individual certification or an evaluation report issued by the ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. c. The bottom of each flood opening shall be one foot or less above the higher of the interior floor or grade, or the exterior grade, immediately below the opening. d. Any louvers, screens or other covers for the flood openings shall allow the automatic flow of floodwaters into and out of the enclosed area. (E) Standards for manufactured homes and recreational vehicles. 1. All manufactured homes placed, or substantially improved, on individual lots or parcels, must meet all the requirements for new construction, including the elevation and anchoring requirements in Section 30-74-13 and Section 30-74-15. 2. All recreational vehicles located in a FEMA designated floodplain shall either: a. Be on site for fewer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, be fully licensed and inspected, and ready for highway use; or b. Meet the minimum requirements for placement and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes as contained in the VA USBC; or c. Be fully licensed and highway ready. A recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and has no permanently attached additions. (F) Standards for subdivision proposals. 1. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; 2. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage; 3. All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards; and 4. When the FIS does not provide detailed base flood elevations, base flood elevation data shall be obtained from other sources or developed using detailed methodologies, hydraulic and hydrologic analysis, comparable to those contained in a flood insurance study for subdivision proposals and other proposed development proposals (including manufactured home parks and subdivisions) that exceed fifty (5) lots or five (5) acres, whichever is the lesser. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 12 of 15 Sec. 30-74-16. Existing Structures in Floodplain Areas. (A) Any structure or use of a structure or premises must be brought into conformity with these provisions when it is changed, repaired, or improved unless one of the following exceptions is established before the change: 1. The floodplain administrator has determined that: a. Change is not a substantial repair or substantial improvement; and b. No new square footage is being built in the floodplain that is not compliant; and c. No new square footage is being built in the floodway; and d. The change complies with the zoning ordinance and the VA USBC. 2. The changes are required to comply with a citation for a health and safety violation. 3. The structure is a historic structure and the change requires would impair the historic nature of the structure. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-17. Variances. (A) Variances shall be issued only upon a showing of good and sufficient cause, and after the BZA has determined that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. While the granting of variances generally is limited to a lot size less than one-half (1/2) acre, deviations from that limitation may occur. However, as the lot size increases beyond one-half (1/2) acre, the technical justification required for issuing a variance increases. Variances may be issued by the BZA for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half (%) acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, in conformance with the provisions of this section. Variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the criteria of this section are met, and the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. In passing upon applications for variances, the BZA shall satisfy all relevant factors and procedures set forth in Section 30-24-1 et seq. of the zoning ordinance and consider the following additional factors: 1. The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. No variance shall be granted for any proposed use, development, or activity within any floodway district that will cause any increase in the one percent chance flood elevation. 2. The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury of others. 3. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. 4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners. 5. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the county. 6. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. 7. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 13 of 15 8. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. 9. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for the county. 10. The safety of access by ordinary and emergency vehicles to the property in time of flood. 11. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 12. The historic nature of a structure. Variances for repair or rehabilitation of historic structures may be granted upon a determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. 13. No variance shall be granted for an accessory structure exceeding six hundred (600) square feet. 14. Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this Ordinance. (B) The BZA may refer any application and accompanying documentation pertaining to any request for a variance to any engineer or other qualified person or agency for technical assistance in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, and the adequacy of the plans for protection and other related matters. Variances shall only be issued after the BZA has determined that the granting of such will not result in: 1. Unacceptable or prohibited increases in flood heights; 2. Additional threats to public safety; 3. Extraordinary public expense; 4. Creation of nuisances; 5. Fraud or victimization of the public; or 6. Conflict with local laws or ordinances. Variances shall only be issued after the BZA has determined that the variance will be the minimum to provide relief. (C) The BZA shall notify the applicant for a variance, in writing, that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the one percent flood elevation (a) increases the risks to life and property, and (b) will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance. A record of the above notification as well as all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, shall be maintained and any variances which are issued shall be noted in the annual report submitted to the FIA. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-18. Records. Records of actions associated with administering this ordinance shall be kept on file and maintained by or under the direction of the floodplain administrator in perpetuity. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 14 of 15 Sec. 30-74-19. Violations. The failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the county's floodplain management regulations shall be considered a violation. A structure or other development without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in Sections 30-74-13(9), 30-74-15(B)2, 30-74-15(E)4, and 30-74-16(A) is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) Sec. 30-74-20. Penalty for violations. Section 30-22 of the zoning ordinance contains provisions for enforcement of this section and penalties that apply for violations. (Ord. No. 090820-14 , § 1, 9-8-20) (Supp. No. 36) Created: 2022-09-29 13:43:15 [EST] Page 15 of 15 01 CO 0 OSTERHOUOT, FERGUSON NATT. AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 14018-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE gHE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPEP {I§ORS OF ROANOKE COUN IN RE: ) ) , .,NAL ORDER A 1.13 acre parcel of land, generally 1) located on the westerly side of Starkey)p Road, near its intersection with Buck Mountain Road within the Cave Spring Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #87.18-1-40, in the Roanoke County Tax Records. MAC;' 31 TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Pet i t ioners, STEPHEN and MICHELL WIKE, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezc the above -referenced parcel of land from R-I District to District, for the purpose of office use. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planninc Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on March 7, 1989, at which time, all parties in interest we given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after ful I consideration, the Board c County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approv with the proffered conditions., on 3/28/89. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned, parcel of land, which is contained in till Roanoke County Tax Maps as 87.18-1-40 and legally describ below, be rezoned from R-I District to B-I District. OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON N A T T , AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Virginia Secondary Rt. 904 at the Southeasterly corner of the property now or formerly known as the Baptist Parsonage; thence with the westerly side of Starkey Road South 24° 16' West 154 feet to a point in the center of a dry branch; thence leaving Starkey Road North 73° 30' West 310.6 feet to a point; thence North 21° 37' East 191.75 feet to a point; thence South 66° 33' East 316.6 feet to the point and place of beginning. with the following conditions: 1. That the existing residence on the property would be used for the office use with no additions with thl exception of improving the parking on the property. 2. That there wi I I be no printing in connection with the business operation. 3. That existing structure will be utilized without enlargement. 4. The square footage of signs sha I I not exceec 24 square feet. No portable or temporary signs shall be installed. 5. The cinder block garage to the rear of the existing dwel I ing wi I I be used only in connection with the operation of the business on the property and wi II not be leased to outside businesses. 6. 'All on -site parking shall occur to the rear c the front line of the existing dwelling. cc: OSTERHOUOT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-1699 3go? — BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Robers seconded by Supervisor _ a McGraw _ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens DeputClerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors R4.n9.e File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Barrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment CORRECTED - 9128101 (SEE ITALICS1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2001 ORDINANCE 082801-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.13-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5681 STARKEY ROAD, (TAX MAP NO. 87.18-1-40) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-I OFFICE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-I WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF RA -DE DIV., LTD., T/A PERFECT TOUCH. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 28, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1. 13 acres, as described herein, and located at 5681 Starkey Road (Tax Map Number 87.18-1- 40) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-I Office District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-I, Office District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of RA -DE Div., Ltd., T/A Perfect Touch. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: GABOARD120011Aug2818-28RA•DE Div#13,doe 1 (1) That the existing residence on the property would be used for the office use with no additions with the exception of improving the pang on -the Mittert`. (2) That there will be no printing in connection with the business operation. (3) nt The existing house structure is limited to future enlargement not to exceed 100 square feet and shall be built behind the front line of the existing house. (4) . Signage shall'be limited to 24 square feet, 5 feet in height. Monument style sign shall be required. (5) The cinder block garage to the rear of the a&isting dwelling will be used only in connection with the operation of the business on the property and will not be leased to outside businesses, (6) All on -site parking shall occur to the rear of the front line of the existing dwelling. If petitioners choose to construct additional parking, that parking shall be of a pervious surface. (7) Landscaping is to be planted to provide a visual buffer between the existing parking lot and Starkey Road. Landscaping shall include at a minimum, 1-2 Leyland Cyprus or other evergreen type tree, not to include white pine, and 3-4 deciduous or evergreen bushes planted along the eastern side of the parking lot. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Virginia Secondary Rt. 904 at the Southeasterly corner of the property now or formerly known as the Baptist Parsonage; thence with the westerly side of Starkey Road South 24 ° 16' West 154 feet to a point in the center of a dry branch; thence leaving Starkey Road North 73° 30' West 310.6 feet to a point; thence North 21 b 37' East 191.75 feet to a point; thence South 66° 33' East 316.6 feet to the point and place of beginning 5, That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed G:\BOARD \2001 \Aug2818.28RA-DE 17iv# 13.doc 2 to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Alien, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Senior Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney G:\BOARD\20011Aug2818-28RA-DB Div#13.doc MAP UPDATED VERIFIED BY--- BY_,_,_.,_. DATEDATE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2008 ORDINANCE 102808-10 TO MODIFY EXISTING PROFFERED CONDITIONS IN A C-1C, OFFICE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, ON 1.241 ACRES LOCATED AT 5681 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 87.18-1-40), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE APPLICATION OF STARKEY MEDICAL, PC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 26, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing were held October 28, 2008, and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 2008 and October 7, 2008, and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1., That the proffered conditions in a C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, on a certain tract of real estate containing 1.241 acres, as described herein, and located at 5681 Starkey Road (Tax Map Number 87.18-1-40) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, are hereby amended as set out below. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Starkey Medical, PC.. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan prepared by Craighead and Associates, dated September 29, 2008. (2) No more than 5,600 square feet of medical office shall be constructed, and no more than 2,464 square feet of general office shall be constructed including the existing structure,. (3) The proposed building shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the Starkey Road Elevation (East) prepared by Craighead and Associates, dated August 10, 2008. (4) The proposed landscaping shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the Landscape Plan prepared by Craighead and Associates, dated September 29, 2008. (5) If a new freestanding sign is proposed, it shall be monument in style, and constructed with materials to compliment the proposed budding elevation. The monument sign shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height and contain no more than fifty (50) total square feet. (6) All exterior lighting poles shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in total height inclusive of the base. (7) The proposed uses on -site shall be limited to General Office, Medical Office, Business or trade schools and Guidance Services. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows. Beginning at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Virginia Secondary Route 904 at the southeasterly corner of the property now or formerly known as the Baptist Parsonage; thence with the westerly side of Starkey Road South 24° 16' West 154 feet to a point in the center of a dry branch; thence leaving Starkey Road North 73° 30' West 310.6 feet to a point; thence North 21° 37' East 191.75 feet to a point; thence South 66° 33' East 316.6 feet to the point of beginning. 2 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Altizer, McNamara, Flora NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: auat, Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board c Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director, Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning John Murphy, Zoning Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2020 ORDINANCE 022520-6 GRANTING PETITION TO REMOVE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON 1.24 ACRE PARCEL OWNED BY MICHELE MEINHART LOCATED AT 5681 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO 87.18-01-40.00-0000) WHEREAS, Michele Meinhart is the owner of a 1.24 acre parcel of land located at 5681 Starkey Road (Tax Map No. 87.18-01-40.00-0000); and WHEREAS, during a re -zoning process in 2008, the property was re -zoned with seven proffered conditions; and WHEREAS, Meinhart has requested that those conditions be removed so that the property could be redeveloped for all permitted uses in the C-1 zoned district; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the petition; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 28, 2020, and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 25, 2020; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the proffered conditions on property identified as 5681 Starkey Road, in the CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (Tax Map No. 087.18-01- 40.00-0000) are hereby removed as follows: Page 1 of 3 a. Thc property shall bc developed in substantial conformancc with thc site b. No more than 5,600 square feet of medical office shall be constructed, and no morc than 2/16/1 squarc fcct of gcncral office shall be constructed including thc existing structure. c. Thc proposed building shall bc constructed in substantial conformancc with the Starkey Road Elevation (Gast) prepared by Craighead and Associatcs, datcd August 10, 2008. d. Thc proposed landscaping plan shall bc constructed in substantial conformancc with thc Landscape Plan preparcd by Craighcad and Associates, datcd Scptcmber 29, 2008. e. If a-new-frces and+pg ,ign is p�-propos it shall be moni iment i Zaannd constructed with materials to complimcnt the proposed building elcvation. Thc monument sign shall not cxcccd tcn (10) fect in hcight and contain no morc than fifty (50) total squarc fcct. f. All extcrior lighting poles shall not cxcced fiftccn (15) fcct in total hcight inclusive of thc base. Office, Busincss or tradc schools and Guidance Services. 2. The Board finds that removal of the formerly proffered conditions is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice, and will not be a substantial detriment to the community. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 3 On motion of Supervisor Hooker to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Hooker, North, Peters, Radford ABSENT: Supervisor Mahoney NAYS: None ACJ TESTE: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk t e Board of Supervisors cc: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services Kenneth Fay, Director of Real Estate Valuation Mary Beth Nash, Senior Assistant County Attorney Rebecca James, Acting Zoning Administrator Page 3 of 3 Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger -scale highway -oriented retail uses and regionally -based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the proj ected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. From: Megan Cronise To: Planning, Planning CC: Thompson, Philip; James, Rebecca; Cruz -Cruz, Lionel Date: 4/6/2023 12:05 PM Subject: Fwd: Comment Review Request for Hugo Jimenez Attachments: Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan Excerpt.pdf Good afternoon, Transportation comments on this case are as follows: Starkey Road in this location is included in the RVARC Regional Pedestrian Vision Plan. This portion is included in the high priority recommendation for sidewalk along Starkey Road from Hunting Hills Drive to Merriman Road. Please see the attached excerpts for more information. A roundabout is under construction at the intersection of Starkey Road and Buck Mountain Road. Sidewalks are included with this project along the frontage of 5701 Starkey Road. While we would appreciate construction of sidewalk along the frontage of the subject parcel, we understand that it would require a bridge over the Back Creek tributary which makes it likely infeasible. Please contact me with questions. Thank you, Megan Megan G. Cronise, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Roanoke County Department of Planning (540) 772-2106 mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov >>> Cecelia Thomas 3/23/2023 2:07 PM >>> Good Afternoon, Please find attached an application packet for the petition of Hugo Jimenez. The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on this petition on Tuesday, May 2, 2023. Please review and email your comments to planning@roanokecountyva.gov by Friday, April 7th, 2023. Thank you, Gu 2Li cv Tko-vwwy Planning Administrative Assistant Department of Planning Phone 540-772-2082 Fax 540-776-7155 cthomas@roanokecountyva.gov M Prepared by the REGIONAL REGIONAL PEDESTI Roanoke County Type Legend: 1 = Intersection, 2 = ID LOCATION TYPE DESCRIPTION LOCAL SOURCE PRIORITY 451 Starkey Rd from Electric Rd to Hunting Hills Dr 2 Sidewalk High Roanoke County 452 Starkey Rd from Hunting Hills Dr to Merriman 2 Sidewalk High Roanoke County 453 Starkey Rd from Ogden Rd to 419 2 Pedestrian improvements Medium Ped/Transit Pub 458 Thirlane Rd from existing sidewalk to Wood Haven 2 Sidewalk Low Roanoke County 459 Thompson Memorial - Mtn Heights Dr to Rt 311 2 Sidewalk Low Roanoke County 460 Thompson Memorial - Mtn Heights Dr to Salem Limits 2 Sidewalk High Roanoke County 462 Tinker Creek Greenway county line to 1-81 2 Greenway hard surface Medium Roanoke Valley i 2007 493 Washington Ave - Goode Park Rd to William Byrd HS 2 Pedestrian improvements Medium Ped/Transit Pub 503 West Main from Ft Lewis to Technology 2 Sidewalk Medium Roanoke County 518 Williamson Rd from Abney to Clubhouse 2 Pedestrian improvements Medium Ped/Transit Pub 519 Williamson Rd from Abney to Roanoke City 2 Pedestrian improvements Medium Ped/Transit Pub 520 Williamson Rd from Clubhouse to Middleton 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub 521 Williamson Rd from Hollins Campus to Plantation Rd 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub 522 Williamson Rd from Middleton to Greenway Dr 2 Pedestrian improvements High Ped/Transit Pub 011.11 Prepared by the REGIONAL' ` REGIONAL PEDESTR Central gu Iti mod al Qj t1ict *44, G • Legend Existing Transit Stops Existing Harp Surface. Existing Natural Surface Conceptual Greerrway 'Plan (2307) Ultimo -clef Centers MuMurndal D61rats 2040 WO StudyArww L__J Jurisdictions! di es MulModal Corridors Avenue Major Avenue Boulevard Off -Road Transportation Corridor Muitirnodel Through Corridor Recommendations Type Inter secticr Hard Surface Streets cape ic Srr.•r�, •'• 1 1 ,,,.„,, at1` 1c 1 1 0 1 * Rt • s • •• s ie 4 . O ... ' .. l * , Ggtrearx lo **♦ f et t• � ! • •• • I. South County $ Library $ • <r„ $` • sa k. I. 411111.9. .,yam From: dennis brown <dennisbrowncwp@gmail.com> To: <Icruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov> CC: Linda Kolnok <kolnok75@yahoo.com> Date: 4/13/2023 12:04 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Starkey Rd Mr Cruz -Cruz, As a resident of Rockbridge Ct, I received notice that a company has asked for rezoning of 5681 Starkey Rd for a construction yard.. These properties were zoned C-1 for a reason! Starkey road cannot support the traffic for any large business on this end. Friendship Manor was built on Starkey Road and we were assured that traffic would not increase because residents were there for rehab and visitors would not be in and out regularly but that is not true, now they house long term residents and vendors, employees and visitors are in and out constantly causing issues on this 2 lane portion of starkey rd. Traffic backs up regularly on a daily basis past Friendship Manor. There is work being done in the future to put in a roundabout at the intersection of Starkey and Buck Mountain Road. This will not decrease the traffic but might alleviate the chaos at that intersection but this work is a good while away. Large trucks speed up and down this portion of Starkey rd day and night trying to use the shortcut to rt 220 and there is NO shoulder anywhere on this portion of Starkey rd and someone is eventually going to be killed. There are plenty of other properties in Roanoke county this company can purchase for their business but allowing it here just because they found a great price and they asked for rezoning is ludicrous. We do NOT need heavy trucks and bulldozers going up and down this narrow portion of Starkey rd. As our liazon to Roanoke County please put an end to this request. I look forward to hearing back from you personally. Thank you, Dennis Brown 5635 Rockbridge Ct WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. Hugo Jimer Rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land frc Commercial District to 1-1, Low Intensity Inds obtain a special use permit to operate a Board of Supervisors Public HE May 23, 2023 Location Ma • 5681 Starkey Rd • 1.24 Acres • Property is currently not being used - previous use was for a language club • Proposed Rezoning & SUP for a Construction Yard (Landscaping Business) 3 Project Site 4 Flood Plain M • 5 Photograph Photograph 8 Photograph, Photograph 10 Photograph 11 Photographs • : • vq4,4 r • • ' • 111-, !Yr- • -‘5f7J : " • krthiYtitir Photograph • The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance d Yard as "Establishments housing facilities < engaged in construction activities, includ materials and equipment. Typical uses arE yards." • The Construction Yard use type is only per with an approved Special Use Permit. 13 Zoning Backgr• ADJACENT PROPERTY Friercip Apartment Village C2-65 r t1 Trbiler I 1' I= Troller _r1k, 1.ex1 Fox Leaf Lox Troller Trailer ›=3;,-,i 6A1R.A6! (Wx30'' size) ' Indat Storaop mall Tools Vulch Blower Jr Compressor IcenvIt V't Existing Asphalt. 7•••• Access ILK up irvk': Citmptrtick NEVI CR1151fJ7 GRAVEL ACCE55 DRIVE TIE-IN (±101 Nue) BLEAR ifol4 AT 5ACK RIGHT PROPERTY CORNER FOR VE- HICLE PARKIN& (screened) gEIN CMFED GRAVEL PAVING FOR VEHICLE PAIRKINMV4E55 7 • • •''. " . . t • .'" , . —Approximate Property Doe (pr Roc Goiit online tax wing infornution) e•-• Tree ADJACENT PROFERTY 5665 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virghla Friendship Apartment village L2--C,5 Existing Gravel Access Drive %al Starkey Rood -Roanoke, Virginia • Cvinptruck • • LE)06t164iikns.PhoIt Pdric.;n4Areq• • • •••. •. / . . . . . • •;•($0.6 %rete.fiheitki Lops): 'to9tUsTaNis eARKwikREAYOR"-,. bkltIN.,•• • • • - - • • •--• • • • . , . : .:‘, ,.. . ... x.-----.1/4.::\, • ) •:. ....F VEHICLE PARKi '-`• -"..-±< / 1,..?kill'i — ; '','. ";•.FWPERTY'.C,4 K ---,•-t,;,,- \ _ \ fr• . / ..., . ,-• ,,, /- 1-liq_E-PAKING (scree - • ., '-•-..., .....--7.. •- , — ' -- \-'• '' -' -V \ ,,/,______ i. — ---7--- ADJACENT PROPERTY 56,15 Starkey Road, Rocrioke, Llyen hIgujen, CI-C E.dtIn Tree0. • • •` ' • • , , EvezcAlfuliier .. re tAtaluipke 'S.5":aL• 'eet,Vo re 11 _ .PAttf:.„46E J. NTH. LONA ' Siqr 011-.641/x 1.:ssat,:p .'loacl=to I rOnVentrt EX15t1lig ASPflait ALC..B55 Drive opc 1‘6.4" DOR 14 Concept Pia Existing Zoning • C-1 Low Intensity Commercial District Surrounding Zoning • North —C-2CS • East — C-1, R-3 • West — C-2CS • South—C-1C 15 Zoning Core • Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. • Intense retail and highway - oriented commercial uses are appropriate in core areas. • Appropriate land use types include general retail shops and personal services, office and institutional uses, and limited industrial uses. • The proposed Rezoning and Special Use are consistent with the Core Future Land Use Designation. 01-0 () Q -632 16 Future Land U Public Hearing -May 2, 2023 • Seven (7) citizens spoke during the public and 1 in support). • Concerns raised included: • Project not being in compliance with the limit an economic opportunity area under the Cor in the County's Comprehensive Plan; • The flood -prone nature of the parcel does no statement of the 1-1 zoning district; • Potential increase in traffic; • Noise levels; • Pollution; • Stockpiling of materials in a floodplain; and • The number of vehicles and equipment to be 17 Planning Commit Twelve' Knob a'Clock Legend ▪ Commercial ® Industrial C] Other No Seale 18 Planning Commit Public Hearing -May 2, 2023 • The property owner spoke on behalf of tr • She focused on the quality of work and ti applicant. • She affirmed that the applicant has beer local community for over two decades a debris or landscaping materials on the pr • Furthermore, she asserted that the applic result in an influx of traffic, as there are nc 19 Planning Commit • The applicant outlined his intention to reloc "Enchanted Lawns," to the parcel. • He emphasized that despite the change ir fundamental nature of his business would r unchanged. • He also stressed that his current business pr 5123 Starkey Lane off Starkey Road, alreac Road, negating any substantial increase ir • His business is primarily engage in Iandscar demolition, and irrigation work. • The applicant confirmed that he would no gravel/stone on the property. • He also explained that they make daily trip dispose of any waste generated by their o 20 Planning Commit • The Planning Commission discussed: • Floodplain regulations; • Zoning districts where a construction yard • The nature of the landscaping business; • The stockpiling of materials; • Economic opportunity areas in the 2005 C • The purpose statement of the 1-1 Industrial • Visibility from Starkey Road; • Proposed buffers; and • The surrounding zoning and impact of zon 21 Planning Commit The Planning Commission recommends ar from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial Distric Industrial District, with the following proffer 1. The Property owner hereby proffers that the developed and used for the following pulp( Medical Office, Business or Trade Schools, C Garden Center, Personal Improvement Sery Hospital/Clinic. In addition to the uses listed owner proffers that a Construction Yard ma property with an approved special use perr 22 Planning Commit The Planning Commission also recomm the special use permit for a constructio condition: 1. The site shall be developed in substant the concept plan titled "Conceptu prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape dated March 20, 2023. 23 Planning Commit Question 24 IS' Twelve. O'Clock Knob 49 From: Charlotte Kidd <kiddca@vt.edu> To: <Icruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov>, <pmahoney@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 4/18/2023 5:19 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Rezoning of 5682 Starkey Road Gentlemen, I am writing to you about my concern with rezoning of the property at 5681 Starkey Road from commercial to industrial. I live up the street at Chantilly Place (Rockbridge Court) and the traffic on Starkey Road is already very heavy. We have tanker trucks going up and down this road all day and night many of which use this road as a cut through from Electric Road to Buck Mountain and then Rt 220. I happen to live fairly close to the road and this noise gets worse all the time. Between 4 and 5pm the traffic on Starkey is often backed up from Buck Mountain to Woods Crossings and having big dump trucks entering the road will make this worse. According to the info we received from the department of planning the owner wants to put in a commercial construction yard on this property. They are working on a roundabout at the end of Starkey and Buck Mountain which will help the traffic situation but having heavy equipment, big dump trucks and other vehicles added to the already heavy traffic use will only make the situation worse, even with a roundabout not to mention an increase in noise by big trucks and equipment. Our street would like to remain a quiet and peaceful place to live and I fear this new commercial venture will interrupt our quality of life. I am asking you to vote against this rezoning request. Thank You, Charlotte Kidd 5608 Rockbridge Court Roanoke, Va. 24018 WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. From: TOMMY SMITH <pappytom@cox.net> To: <Icruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov> CC: Tommy Smith <pappytom@cox.net> Date: 4/17/2023 1:17 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Rezoning request for 5681 Starkey Rd. I strongly oppose the proposed rezoning request for 5681 Starkey Road for a number of reasons: 1. The proposed construction facility would result in an unsightly mass of construction vehicles that will adversely effect the property values for nearby property owners. 2. The proliferation of additional dump trucks will further entangle traffic in the area and negate the positive advantages of the new traffic circle being constructed nearby. One can only imagine the level of noise, pollution and traffic jam these vehicles will create! 3. It is my understanding that Friendship Retirement has plans to construct Senior Housing Units on property adjacent to the one in question. I am quit certain that they will not move forward with those plans. Any tax revenue gained by the addition of the proposed construction company would be largely offset by the revenue lost by the cancellation of Friendship's expansion. My wife and I, along with many of our neighbors, plan to attend the May 2nd hearing in order to express our profound opposition to this disastrous request. Tommy Smith 5627 Rockbridge Court pappytom@cox.net WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. From: dennis brown <dennisbrowncwp@gmail.com> To: <Icruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov> CC: Linda Kolnok <kolnok75@yahoo.com> Date: 4/13/2023 12:04 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Starkey Rd Mr Cruz -Cruz, As a resident of Rockbridge Ct, I received notice that a company has asked for rezoning of 5681 Starkey Rd for a construction yard.. These properties were zoned C-1 for a reason! Starkey road cannot support the traffic for any large business on this end. Friendship Manor was built on Starkey Road and we were assured that traffic would not increase because residents were there for rehab and visitors would not be in and out regularly but that is not true, now they house long term residents and vendors, employees and visitors are in and out constantly causing issues on this 2 lane portion of starkey rd. Traffic backs up regularly on a daily basis past Friendship Manor. There is work being done in the future to put in a roundabout at the intersection of Starkey and Buck Mountain Road. This will not decrease the traffic but might alleviate the chaos at that intersection but this work is a good while away. Large trucks speed up and down this portion of Starkey rd day and night trying to use the shortcut to rt 220 and there is NO shoulder anywhere on this portion of Starkey rd and someone is eventually going to be killed. There are plenty of other properties in Roanoke county this company can purchase for their business but allowing it here just because they found a great price and they asked for rezoning is ludicrous. We do NOT need heavy trucks and bulldozers going up and down this narrow portion of Starkey rd. As our liazon to Roanoke County please put an end to this request. I look forward to hearing back from you personally. Thank you, Dennis Brown 5635 Rockbridge Ct WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. From: David Flora Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 9:51 PM To: David Flora Subject: Fwd: 5681 Starkey Road Zoning Change Proposal Sent! Forwarded message From: David Rota < Date: Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:49 PM Subject: 5681 Starkey Road Zoning Change Proposal To: < Dear Mr McMurray, I am writing for the upcoming zoning change proposed for 5681 Starkey Road. I have lived within a half a mile of this location, on both Crescent Boulevard and Kings Chase Drive, all my life. The traffic in this area has increased dramatically over recent years. Truck traffic in particular on Buck Mountain Road is already at a very high level. This proposal calls for employee and work vehicle traffic in an already congested area. also have the following questions/concerns: -Will changing the zoning to light industrial make it easier for other nearby properties to be made Tight industrial or more industrial? -Will mulch, stone, tree trimmings or old leaves from cleanup be stockpiled in an unsightly manner? -Will old unusable equipment be left on the property and make it look unsightly? -Will the house (office) also be used for housing at any time? -Traffic on Starkey Road often backs up beyond this property at peak travel hours. There are already large trucks going to Bandy Landfill. Gasoline tankers are coming and going from 220 to Terminal Road, Steel Service trucks, grain trailers going to Mennel Mill and tankers hauling flour from there. Trucks from the Rockydale Plant. Then there are also trucks on and out of the Starkey Industrial Park (Commonwealth Drive). It seems there are other areas already zoned for this purpose that would be more appropriate for this project. The surrounding neighborhoods of Crescent Heights, Branderwood, and Kings Chase are good family neighborhoods. Please do not vote yes for any proposals that increase truck traffic and noise for these families. I appreciate your review and consideration of this important aecz:: Kind Regards, Good evening! I am Linda Kolnok and my husband and I live at 5644 Rockbridge Court and I am President of Chantilly Place Homeowners Association. Our little street is made up of 17 condos and our street is directly across from Friendship Rehab on Starkey Road. I am here to represent the people that live on this quiet street. I would like everyone that lives on Rockbridge Court to put their hands up to show that we are concerned .about this rezoning. We do not want to see this property rezoned from the Commercial District to Industrial District so that a special use permit to operate a construction yard can be obtained. The main concern is letting a construction landscape company move in across the bridge from the much -needed roundabout that the government is putting in at Starkey and Buck Mountain Road to relief the traffic congestion. This business is going to cause traffic problems when Dump trucks, pickup trucks with trailers, and pickups with equipment try to turn left onto property after they have come through the roundabout from Buck Mountain. This could also cause backup to traffic going down Starkey towards the roundabout. This property is sitting in a floodplain and is relatively flat. #3 of Section 30-74 FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance states: Stockpiling of materials in the Floodway is prohibited. How can you have a construction landscape company without stored mulch, gravel, and dirt for its jobs. We have a lot of small to large vehicle traffic noise, traffic backs up to our street several times a day, and speeding vehicles. We don't need more large vehicle traffic to cause problems on Starkey Road. Also, our concerns are pollution, equipment Teaks especially into nearby creek, noise, dust and being eye sore. The plan shows trees being planted but this lot is open so it will be eye sore when passing it no matter how many trees are planted. This is a residential area from our street up Starkey, and we would like to see most of it stay that way south of us. Thank you! Page 1 of 3 Philip Thompson - Fwd: [EXTERNAL] - Rezoning of Parcel at 5681 Starkey Road From: Debbie Jacks To: Board (Debbie Jacks); Thompson, Philip Date: 5/17/2023 10:48 AM Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] - Rezoning of Parcel at 5681 Starkey Road Deborah C. Jacks County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2003 (540) 772-2005 (540) 772-2193 - fax (540) 494-2627 - cell djacks©roa nokecou ntyva.gov >>> Kathy Vanness <kathyvanness@outlook.com> 5/17/2023 10:47 AM >>> Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Dear Members of the Board: My name is Kathy Vanness, and I recently purchased a home in Chantilly Place at 5615 Rockbridge Court. My husband and I were welcomed warmly by our new Roanoke County neighborhood, and immediately informed of their concern of a zoning request that in all probability will disrupt the quiet enjoyment of our new home. I was previously a resident and registered voter in the City of Roanoke and have now registered to vote in Roanoke County. This is to note that I am interested and engaged in the local governance of the area in which I live. I am writing with regards to Hugo Jimenez's request to rezone the property at 5681 Starkey Road from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District, to 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, and the related request to obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard at this location. This request will be considered at your May 23rd meeting. 1 attended, listened, and spoke at the zoning commission's public hearing on May 2nd. After hearing both the interests of Mr. Jimenez and his one supporter (the current owner of the property in question who would also personally benefit from the rezoning) 1 reiterate my strong opposition to Mr. Jimenez's request for the following reasons: • This section of Starkey Road, from Crescent Boulevard to Buck Mountain Road, is two lane and mostly residential. Operation of a construction yard would be completely out of character with this area, and negatively impact the quality of life and property values of residents in this area. During the public hearing, 1 learned that many residents have made this area their home for many years, even for multiple generations. A duty to protect these County residents, including the ill and elderly living in Friendship South, lies with their elected representatives. • A construction yard operation with 11 trailers, 7 pickup trucks, 3 dump trucks and excavators (as described by the staff report) would bring additional traffic, noise and dust file :///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/6464B112P02_DOMAINM-... 5/18/2023 Page 2 of 3 to this section of Starkey Road. It was noted during the hearing as a point of support for the request that the equipment will only be moved in and out of the construction yard twice a day. However, these timeframes are during peak commuting hours, the very worst time to slow traffic. • The County is currently constructing a much -needed and welcome roundabout to improve traffic flow at the intersection of Starkey and Buck Mountain Roads, at an estimated expense of $3.1 million according to a recent Roanoke Times report. A construction yard operation right at the Starkey Road entrance to the new roundabout, adding slow moving dump trucks, trailers and heavy equipment traffic during commuting hours, will be dangerous and totally undermine the planned benefits of the new roundabout. • Construction and landscaping equipment like that planned by Mr. Jimenez invariably leaks diesel fuel and hydraulic oils. The property at 5681 Starkey Road is in a designated floodplain and abuts Back Creek, which is a tributary of Smith Mountain Lake. In addition to its recreational benefits, Smith Mountain Lake is also a source of drinking water. A construction yard on this site creates the very real possibility of hazardous runoff finding its way into the water supply. Given the fragile state of our waters, why would the County purposely endorse a known risk if it could be completely avoided? • Related to environmental concerns, during the hearing, it was noted that no stockpiles of landscaping materials (mulch, dirt, ice melt, etc.) would be kept on site. When asked how this would be monitored, no clear answer was provided. I do not think it possible that such materials would never be stored on site by a landscaping company — a quick visual inspection of other similar landscape construction yards on Starkey Lane clearly show such materials on site at least on a temporary basis between jobs. How will this be addressed? • During the hearing, I learned that Mr. Jimenez currently operates a similar construction yard off a different section of Starkey. This was noted to support the application. However, trading a current site which is apparently already zoned for his type of business for a different site within a short distance not currently appropriate for his business makes no financial sense for the County. There is no net gain of revenue for the County in terms of business tax revenue if Mr. Jimenez simply trades one site for another within the County, though it was not clear to me where his business is registered, as Mr. Jimenez stated that his personal residence is in Elliston. • I would also point out that Mr. Jimenez is not a resident or voter in Roanoke County. Approving this action will assist one business owner who does not even live in the area, to the detriment of a multitude of tax -paying residents who have chosen this part of the County in which to make their permanent homes. As elected officials serving at the pleasure of voters whom they are supposed to represent, I feel it is your fiduciary responsibility to act in the residents' best interest. I would appreciate a direct response addressing the questions I've raised, but barring that, at the very least would like to see these issues addressed at the May 23rd meeting. In sum, this rezoning request should not be approved because of the multiple real and potential problems it will bring to the nearby residents who will suffer the consequences of a construction yard operation next to their homes. The draft Roanoke County 200 Plan for the Cave Spring CPA states that 1-1 Industrial zones "...are regulated in a manner to protect surrounding properties and natural resources from potential negative impacts commonly associated with industrial activity." 1 ask that you please protect our neighborhood in the manner called for in Roanoke County's 200 Plan. file :///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/6464B 112P02_DOMAINM-... 5/18/2023 Page 3 of 3 Thank you for the opportunity to share my concerns with you. Kathryn A. Vanness 5615 Rockbridge Court Roanoke, VA 24018 540-312-6371 WARNING: This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. DO NOT CLICK any links or downloaded attachments unless you know the content is from a trusted source. file :///C:/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/6464B 112P02_DOMAINM-... 5/18/2023 Page 1 of 2 Philip Thompson - [EXTERNAL] - Enchanted Lawns From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Jeff Frayser <jfrayser@fwmgmt.com> "lcruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov"<lcruz-cruz@roanokecountyva.gov> 5/5/2023 9:56 AM [EXTERNAL] - Enchanted Lawns TMEIC Building.jpg; untitled-19.jpg; untitled-2.jpg To whom it may concern, Enchanted Lawns and Hugo Martinez has been a vital asset to the F&W Management company and our office park for many years. This company goes above and beyond to keep our grounds in excellent manicured shape. This company takes pride in their work and they are prompt in handling any situation that may arise. Enchanted Lawns and their employees are very respectful and have treated our property as their own. We can not vouch enough for the integrity and class A work this company and Hugo Martinez does for us. I have attached several pictures of just a portion of the care they provide to our properties. I have personally been to their current place of business and it has always been kept neat and everything in its place. Their place has a professional appearance and I would expect nothing less from them moving forward. Thank you for your consideration Jeff Frayser 1 Managing Member F+W Real Estate Group 1 F&W Management 3130 Chaparral Dr, S.W., Suite 200 1 Roanoke, VA 24018 T 540 725 8119 1 F 540 776 8680 IC 804 720-5235 jfrayser@fwmgmt.com f±w fwrealestategroup.com This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. file:///C :/Users/pthompson/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/6464A54APO2_DOMAINM... 5/18/2023 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2023 ORDINANCE 1) REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.24 ACRES OF LAND FROM C-1 (LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO I-1C (LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WITH A CONDITION) AND 2) GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A CONSTRUCTION YARD LOCATED AT 5681 STARKEY ROAD, IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO: 087.18-01-40.00-0000) WHEREAS, Hugo Jimenez is requesting to rezone approximately 1.24 acres from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial) District to I-1 C (Low Intensity Industrial) District with one condition on approximately 1.24 acres of land located at 5681 Starkey Road, identified as Roanoke County Tax Map No: 087.18-01-40.00-0000 (hereinafter referred to as the "subject property"); and WHEREAS, Hugo Jimenez is also requesting a special use permit to operate a construction yard on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 2023, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 23, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as requested, with one condition associated with the requested special use permit; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 1 of 2 1 The petition of Hugo Jimenez to rezone the subject property from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) to I-1 C (Low Intensity Industrial District with one condition) is approved, with the following proffered condition: a. The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: general office, medical office, business or trade schools, communication services, garden center, personal improvement services, and veterinary hospital/clinic. In addition to the uses listed above, the property owner proffers that a construction yard may be allowed on the property with an approved special use permit. 2. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning request is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan, is good zoning practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 3. The petition of Hugo Jimenez to obtain a special use permit on the subject property to operate a construction yard is approved, with the following condition: a. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. 4. The Board further finds that the proposed special use permit meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code, that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV (use and design standards) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 2 of 2 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 SAMPLE MOTIONS Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS The petition of Hugo Jimenez to 1) rezone approximately 1.24 acres of land from C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial District) to 1-1 (Low Intensity Industrial District), and to 2) obtain a special use permit to operate a construction yard located at 5681 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, and 2. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested, with the following proffered condition: 1. The Property owner hereby proffers that the property shall only be developed and used for the following purposes: general office, medical office, business or trade schools, communication services, garden center, personal improvement services, and veterinary hospital/clinic. In addition to the uses listed above, the property owner proffers that a construction yard may be allowed on the property with an approved special use permit. I further find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit with the following condition: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan titled "Conceptual Landscape Plan" prepared by Fiddlehead Landscape & Garden Design, dated March 20, 2023. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed rezoning / (and / or) special use permit request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County's adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798