Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/28/2017 - Adopted Board Records AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY,AUGUST28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-1AMENDING RESOLUTION 062818-1 SUPPORTING SMART SCALEPROJECT APPLICATIONSTO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCOPE FOR THE ROUTE 419 AND ROUTE 221 DIVERGING DIAMOND INTERCHANGE WHEREAS,at a regular meeting on August 28, 2018,the Board of Supervisors reviewed an amended SMART SCALEproject application; and WHEREAS, the scope of the Route 419 and Route 220 Diverging Diamond Interchange has been expanded to analyze the adjacent traffic signal network on Route 419; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County will work with the Virginia Department of Transportation to develop plans for changes to traffic signal operationsalong Route 419 at Ogden Road, Elm View Road and S. Peak Boulevard (Wendy’s)to support the Diverging Diamond Interchangewhich will require the potential modification and/or elimination of some vehicular movements and traffic signalphases; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to support both local and regional projects to mitigate congestion, promote economic development, increase accessibility, safety, and environmental quality, as well as develop projects consistent withlocal land use policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following amended SMART SCALEprojectfor Roanoke County application: Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY,AUGUST28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-2SUPPORTING ASMART SCALE APPLICATION BY THE NEW RIVER VALLEY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION WHEREAS,at a regular meeting on August 28,2018,the Board of Supervisors reviewed aproposed SMART SCALEproject applicationto extend the Smart Road from its current terminus to Interstate 81;and WHEREAS, the Smart Road project is identified in the adopted Regional Study on Transportation Project Prioritization for Economic Development and Growth (TED Study); and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to support both local and regional projects to mitigate congestion, promote economic development, increase accessibility, safety, and environmental quality, as well astodevelop projects consistent with local land use policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the Board of Supervisors hereby supports the following SMART SCALEprojectsubmitted by the New River Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization: a.Extension of the Smart Road to Interstate 81 2.That the Clerk to the Board forthwith send a certified copy of this Resolution to Senator Mark Warner, Senator Timothy Kaine, Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE 082818-3AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF A NEW PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY ERNESTINE SMITHTO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTYON PROPERTY OWNED BY ELLENSMITHRYAN(TAX MAP NO. 087.05-04-17.00) FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING STORM WATER MANAGEMENT WHEREAS, theRoanoke County has requested that EllenSmithRyan(“Ryan”) grant the County a new variable one thousand five hundred twenty-one square foot public drainage easement across Ryan’s propertyin the County(Tax Map No.087.05- 04-17.00) said new drainageeasement to adjoin an existing culvertcurrently located on the same parcel; and WHEREAS, the new public drainage easement will facilitate storm water management along Belle Meade Drive, which is a residential area; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing washeld on August 28, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the County shall acquire a new twenty-foot public drainage easement across property belonging to Ryan, adjacent to Belle Meade Drive,more specifically identified on Tax Map No. 087.05-04-17.00, containing 1,521square feetand shown on the attached plat prepared by Caldwell White Associates, dated May 1, 2018,and such conveyance is hereby authorized and approved. Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE 082818-4AMENDING THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 21 TAXATION, ARTICLE III--REAL ESTATE TAXES, SECTION 21-43-- MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF EXEMPTIONS FROM REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES BY DESIGNATION WHEREAS, Pursuant to section 6(a)(6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia and to § 58.1-3651 of the Code of Virginia, the County by ordinance may by designation exempt from real or personal property taxes, or both, the real or personal property, or both, owned by a non-profit organization that uses such property for certain purposes; and WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors finds the costs of providing municipal services has been continuallyincreasing over the past years; and WHEREAS, The Board further finds that it is the announced policy of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the County of Roanoke to distribute the tax burden uniformly, fairly and upon all property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1.The Code of the County of Roanoke is amended and re-enacted by inserting the following Section into Article III of Chapter 21: Sec21-43. Moratorium on the granting of exemptions from real estate and personal property taxes by designation. (a)After the date of adoption of this ordinance, the Commissioner of Revenueshall not accept or continue to process any applications filed by non-profit Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE082818-5AMENDING THE CODE OF THE COUNTYOF ROANOKEBY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING CHAPTER21 TAXATION, ARTICLE III--REAL ESTATE TAXES,DIVISION 4 -- EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES OF CERTAIN PERSONS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 6-B of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia and to § 58.1-3219.14 of the Code of Virginia, the County by ordinance may exempt from taxation certain real property of the surviving spouse of certain emergency services persons killed in the line of duty. WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing were held on August 28, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1.The Code of the County of Roanoke is amended and re-enacted by inserting the following Division to Article III of Chapter 21: ARTICLE III, DIVISION 4 EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES OF CERTAIN PERSONS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY Sec. 21-90.-Title. This articleshall be known as the "Exemption for Surviving Spouses of Certain Persons Killed in the Line of Duty”. The purpose of this divisionis to provide anexemption from taxationforthe qualifying real property of spouses of any law enforcement officer, firefighter, search and rescue personnel, or emergency medical services personnel who are killed in the line of duty. Page 1of 5 Sec. 21-91.–Authority forarticle. This divisionis authorized by the Code of Virginia, Title 58.1, Chapter 32, Article 2.5, Sections 58.1-3219.13 through 58.1-3219.16. Sec. 21-92.-Definitions. As used in this division, unless the context requires otherwise: "Covered person" means any person set forth in the definition of "deceased person" in Section 9.1-400 of the Code of Virginia whose beneficiary, as defined in Section 9.1-400 of the Code of Virginia, is entitled to receive benefitsunder Section 9.1-402of the Code of Virginia, as determined by the Comptroller prior to July 1, 2017, or as determined by the Virginia Retirement System on and after July 1, 2017. Sec. 21-93.-Exemption from taxes on property of surviving spouses of certain persons killed in the line of duty. (a) Pursuant to Article X, Section 6-B of the Constitution of Virginia, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2017, the Countyexemptsfrom taxation the real property described in subsection (b)of the surviving spouse of any covered person who occupies the real property as his principal place of residence. If the covered person's death occurred on or prior to January 1, 2017, and the surviving spouse has a principal residence on January 1, 2017, eligible for the exemption under this section, then the exemption for the surviving spouse shall begin on January 1, 2017. If the covered person's death occurs after January 1, 2017, and the surviving spouse has a principal residence eligible for the exemption under this section on the date that such covered person dies, then the exemption for the surviving spouse shall begin on the date that such covered person dies. If the surviving spouse acquires the property after January 1, 2017, then the exemption shall begin on the date of acquisition, and the previous owner may be entitled to a refund for a pro rata portion of real property taxes paid pursuant to Section 58.1-3360of the Code of Virginia. The Countyshallnotbe liable for any interest on any refund due to the surviving spouse for taxes paid prior to the surviving spouse's filing of the affidavit or written statement required by Section 58.1-3219.15of the Code of Virginia. (b) Those dwellings in the Countywith assessed values in the most recently ended tax year that are not in excess of the average assessed value for such year of a dwelling situated on property that is zoned as single-family residential shall qualify for a total exemption from real property taxes under this article. If the value of a dwelling is in excess of the average assessed value as described in this subsection, then only that portion of the assessed value in excess of the average assessed value shall be subject to real property taxes, and the portion of the assessed value that is not in excess of the average assessed value shall be exempt from real property taxes. Single-family homes, Page 2of 5 condominiums, town homes, manufacturedhomes as defined in Section46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia whether or not the wheels and other equipment previously used for mobility have been removed, and other types of dwellings of surviving spouses, whether or not the land on which the single-family home, condominium, town home, manufacturedhome, or other type of dwelling of a surviving spouse is located is owned by someone other than the surviving spouse, that (i) meet this requirement and (ii) are occupied by such persons as their principal place of residence shall qualify for the real property tax exemption. If the land on which the single-family home, condominium, town home, manufactured home, or other type of dwelling is located is not owned by the surviving spouse, then the land is not exempt. For purposes of determining whether a dwelling, or a portion of its value, is exempt from Countyreal property taxes, the average assessed value shall be such average for all dwellings located within the Countythat are situated on property zoned as single-family residential. (c) The surviving spouse shall qualify for the exemption so long as the surviving spouse does notremarry and continues to occupy the real property as his principal place of residence. The exemption applies without any restriction on the spouse's moving to a different principal place of residence. (d) The Countyshall provide for the exemption from real property taxes of (i) the qualifying dwelling, or that portion of the value of such dwelling and land that qualifies for theexemption pursuant to subsection (b), and (ii) with the exception of land not owned by the surviving spouse, the land, not exceeding one acre, upon which it is situated. A real property improvement other than a dwelling, including the land upon which such improvement is situated, shall also be exempt from taxation so long as the principal use of the improvement is (a) to house or cover motor vehicles or household goods and personal effects as classified in subdivision A 14 ofSection 58.1-3503of the Code of Virginiaand as listed in Section 58.1-3504 of the Code of Virginia and (b) for other than a business purpose. (e)For purposes of this exemption, real property of any surviving spouse of a covered personincludes real property (i) held by a surviving spouse as a tenant for life,(ii) held in a revocable inter vivos trust over which the surviving spouse holds the power of revocation, or (iii) held in an irrevocable trust under which the surviving spouse possesses a life estate or enjoys a continuing right of use or support. Such real property does not include any interest held under a leasehold or term of years. (f) (1)In the event that (i) a surviving spouse is entitled to an exemption under this section by virtue of holding the property in any of the three ways set forth in subsection (e)and (ii) one or more other persons have an ownership interest in the property that permits them to occupy the property, then the tax exemption for the property that otherwise would have been provided shall be prorated by multiplying the amount of the exemption by a fraction the numerator ofwhich is 1 and the denominator of which equals the total number of people having an ownership interest that permits them to occupy the property. Page 3of 5 (2)In the event that the principal residence is jointly owned by two ormore individuals including the surviving spouse, and no person is entitled to the exemption under this section by virtue of holding the property in any of the three ways set forth in subsection (e), then theexemption shall be prorated by multiplying the amount of the exemption by a fraction the numerator of which is the percentage of ownership interest in the dwelling held by the surviving spouse and the denominator of which is 100. Sec. 21-94.-Application for exemption. (a) The surviving spouse claiming the exemption under this divisionshall file with the commissioner of the revenue of the Countyon forms to be supplied by the County,an affidavit or written statement (i) setting forth the surviving spouse's name, (ii) indicating any other joint owners of the real property, (iii) certifying that the real property is occupied as the surviving spouse's principal place of residence, and (iv) including evidence of the determination of the Comptroller or the Virginia RetirementSystem pursuant to subsection (a). Thesurviving spouse shall also provide documentation that he is the surviving spouse of a covered person and of the date that the covered person died.The surviving spouse shall be required to refile the information required by this section only if the surviving spouse's principal place of residence changes. (b) The surviving spouse shall promptly notify the commissioner of the revenue of any remarriage. Sec. 21-95.-Absence from residence. The fact that surviving spouses who are otherwise qualified for tax exemption pursuant to this article are residing in hospitals, nursing homes, convalescenthomes, or other facilities for physical or mental care for extended periods of time shall not be construed to mean that the real estate for which tax exemption is sought does not continue to be the sole dwelling of such persons during such extended periods of other residence, so long as such real estate is not used by or leased to others for consideration. 2.That any provision of the Roanoke County Code not specifically amended above shall remain in full force and effect as adopted. 3.That this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage andat that time, shall be retroactive to January 1, 2017. Page 4of 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE 082818-6ACCEPTINGTHE CONVEYANCE OF THREE (3)PARCELS OF UNIMPROVED REAL ESTATE FOR FORT LEWIS CHURCH ROADTO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, two(2)adjacent land owners desired to donate portions of their property in fee simple,to RoanokeCountyfor right-of-way purposestoconstruct a turnaround at the terminusof Fort Lewis Church Road; and WHEREAS, Marie A. Hannabass, Jeno A. Jackson and Marie A. Hannabass, and Jeno A. Jackson and Jay A. Jacksonhave freely and voluntarily entered into deeds to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia,to thus allow the Board of Supervisorsto obtain ownership of each property for purposesofroad construction upon approval of thisordinance and recordation of deeds;and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisitionand conveyance of real estate interests to the County of Roanoke be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance washeldonJuly 24, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 28, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the donationfrom Marie A. Hannabassofapproximately 0.0295acre of real estate for purposes of location and construction of Fort Lewis Church Road turnaroundas shown onexhibitentitled “ExhibitA”showing right-of-way being Roanoke conveyed to Board of Supervisors, Roanoke Countyby Marie A. Hannabass, County Tax MapParcel#054.02-04-69.00situated along Fort Lewis Church Road, Page 1of 3 CatawbaMagisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginiadated October 20, 2017, is hereby authorized and approved. 2.That the donation from Jeno A. Jackson and Marie A. Hannabassof approximately 0.0163acreof real estate for purposes of location and construction of Fort Lewis Church Road turnaround,as shown on exhibitentitled “Exhibit A”showing right-of-waybeing conveyed to Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County by Jeno A. Jackson and Marie A. HannabassRoanoke County Tax MapParcel#054.02-04-69.00 situated along Fort Lewis Church Road,CatawbaMagisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginiadated October 20, 2017, is hereby authorized and approved. 3.That the donation from Jeno A. Jackson and Jay A. Jackson of approximately 0.0560acreof real estate for purposes of location and construction of Fort Lewis Church Road turnaround, as shown on exhibitentitled “Exhibit A” showing right-of-waybeing conveyed to Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County by Jeno A. Jackson and Jay A. JacksonRoanoke County Tax MapParcel#054.04-07-01.00 situated along Fort Lewis Church Road,CatawbaMagisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginiadated October 20, 2017, is hereby authorized and approved. 4.That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the donationof this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. Page 2of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE 082818-7REPEALING AND REPLACINGTHE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE -CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IV, FROM SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAMTO RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, on July 1, 1994, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 61494-6, enacting a Self-Insurance program to reflect the manner in which the County indemnified losses not otherwise covered bycommercial insurance policies, including coverage for injuries to employees, volunteers, and third parties, as well as coverage for other property and casualty claims and further, the Ordinance provided for a claims management system overseen by County Trustees; and WHEREAS, since it was enacted in 1994 and amended only once since then its original enactment to identify coverage for certain volunteers, the County has recognized that its processes for risk management, claims administration, and indemnifyingthose who allege injury or loss have changed; thus, it is necessary to amend this portion of the County Code to reflect the evolution of more efficient and cost- effective risk management, claims administration and insurance coverage; and WHEREAS, the amendments to this Ordinance will not adversely affect the County, its agents, employees, or citizens with regard to any legally mandated insurance coverage or indemnification; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing were held on August 28, 2018; and Page 1of 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYthe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Self-Insurance ordinance for Roanoke County is hereby repealed and amendedas follows: 1 ARTICLE IV. -SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAMRISK MANAGEMENT Sec. 2-80. -ScopeCreation and purpose. The board of supervisors hereby adopts a self-insurance program ("the program"), effective July 1, 1994. The program provides coverage for losses arising after June 30, 1994, which are not covered by commercial insurance policies purchased by the county. This program is not intended to provide any excess coverage above the limits of any insurance policy purchased from any insurance carrier, insurance pool, or program. The program's protection extends to covered persons, defined below as county officers, employees, and volunteers. Coverage is subject to the provisions and exclusions listed in the program. The program is established for the purpose of providing a system through which the county will retain certain risks and manage the claims which emanate from public liability incidents and the legal obligations imposed as the result of injury to employees. The program is created for the purpose of paying all legitimate claims and expenses which arise under the program. This program is not a contract between the county and any person, employee or entity, and it expressly intends not to create any third party beneficiaries under the program. This program creates no vested rights or property interests in anyone except as required by statute and may be amended at any time by the board of supervisors. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) The Countyshall provide for the administration of claimsarising out of accidents and other occurrences ofalleged injury topersons or propertythat may be brought against the County, its officers, agents and employees,and further, shall provide for the administration of any judicially-mandated awards from such claimsin accordance with all applicable provisions of the Dpef!pg!Wjshjojb and/or other applicablestatutes or regulations. The County Administrator, or their designee, shall be responsible for the management and/or oversight of such claims, and all other risk management measures implemented pursuant to these provisions. 1 Section 15.2-1518 sets forth the authority for the County to obtain insurance or self-insure for the risks described herein. Page 2of 13 To the extent that the County elects to enter into contracts of insurance or participate in group self-insurance pools to indemnify the County against such claims, it shall do so in accord with all applicable statutes. The County shall also provide for reasonable risk-management measures and/or services necessary to mitigate the County’s losses and liabilities for such claims. Nothing contained in these risk management provisionsshall be construed to abrogate or waive any defense of sovereign immunity, official immunity, governmental immunity, or any other defense available to the County, or any covered person. These risk management provisions do not create a contract between the County and any person, employee, agent or entity, nor is it intended to create any third-party beneficiaries. These provisions do not create any vested rights or property interests in anyone, except as required by statute. Sec. 2-81. -Definitions. As used in this article, unless the context requires a different meaning: Dmbjn)t*means requests for payment for personal injury or property damage. Dpvouz!pggjdfs means a member of the board of county supervisors, a constitutional officer, an elected official, or a member of a board, commission or authority which is appointed by the board of supervisors or performs functions of the county, e.g., electoral board, board of zoning appeals. Dpwfsfe!qfstpo means a county officer, county employee, or fire and rescue volunteer. Fnqmpzff means a person other than a volunteer or county officer who performs services for the county, is paid wages or a salary by the county in exchange for services, and who is subject to direction by county officers or their designees. The term also includes persons who perform functions of the county, e.g., registrar. The term specifically excludes independent contractors. Pddvssfodf means an event or accident that results in personal injury or property damage. Qfstpobm!jokvsz includes: (1) Death, bodily injury, sickness, shock, intentional infliction of mental anguish or mental injury; (2) False arrest, false imprisonment, wrongful eviction, wrongful detention, malicious prosecution, or humiliation; (3) Libel, slander, defamation, invasion of rights to privacy, infringement of copyright, false service of civil papers, abuse of process; Page 3of 13 (4) Assault and battery; and (5) Deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by state or federal law or by the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of Virginia. Qspqfsuz!ebnbhf means physical injury to or destruction of tangible and/or intangible property and all direct and consequential loss resulting therefrom. Tfmg.jotvsbodf!gvoe/The risk management fund shall be a continuing appropriation, notwithstanding fiscal years, to be used for payment of the administrative costs, expenses, settlements, judgments, and claims of the self-insurance program. The self- insurance fund may also be augmented from time-to-time with transfers from other accounts. Tfmg.jotvsbodf!usvtufft/There is hereby created a self-insurance committee for the purpose of administering, in accordance with the provisions of this article, the self- insurance program with the risk manager. The self-insurance trustees shall be comprised of the county administrator, county attorney, director of finance, and the risk manager, or their designee. Wpmvouffs means a person other than a county officer or employee who performs services for the county without remuneration and who performs them subject to direction by county officers or employees and who is registered as such with the county's department of human resources. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94; Ord. No. 022316-3, 2-23-16) Sec. 2-82. -Limits of liability: $5,000,000 per occurrence. (a) Jo!hfofsbm/The county and the self-insurance program shall defend a covered person against any suit seeking damage covered by the program, even if some or all of the allegations are groundless, false or fraudulent. The program shall not, however, be obligated to pay any claim or judgment or to defend any suit once the limit of the liability coverage has been exhausted. (b) Tqfdjgjd!dptut/The self-insurance program will pay, within the per occurrence limit of liability coverage: (1) All expenses incurred and costs taxed against a covered person in any suit defended by the program and any interest assessed on any judgment, including prejudgment interest as well as interest which accrues after entry of judgment. (2) Any premiums on appeals bonds required by any suit defended by the program. (3) All reasonable expenses incurred in the investigation or defense of any claim or suit. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) Sec. 2-83. -Risks covered by the program. Page 4of 13 (a) In accordance with section 2-82 of this program, the county shall indemnify against personal injury or property damage losses arising from actions or inactions taken or not taken by or on behalf of the county or its related agencies in such amounts as the county shall approve, after it isdetermined that: (1) Indemnifying against such losses would have a beneficial effect on the county's ability to employ and retain qualified employees; or (2) Indemnifying against such losses would otherwise further the county's lawful responsibilities without detrimentally affecting the county's responsibilities as a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (b) In the event the county chooses to limit indemnification, it shall notify the employee of such limitation in a reasonable time following receipt of the claim. (c) Risks covered by the program include: (1) Property damage (including consequential damages when not due to other causes excluded by the program) to or loss of real and personal property owned by the county or property owned by others that is under care, custody or control of the county. a. Property damage shall include: 1. The expense of removing damaged property and debris (other than building foundations) after any covered loss; 2. Expenses incurred to reduce or prevent actual or imminent loss or damage as long as these expenses are less than the loss or damage being reduced or prevented; 3. Expenses incurred due to the demolition of undamaged portions of covered property when required by law, ordinance, code or regulation, including site clearing, replacement of the undamaged portion, and business interruption expenses due to the delay in repair or rebuilding; 4. Architects' fees for consultation arising from covered losses, subject to a limit of seven (7) percent of replacement cost; and 5. Construction or repair expenses required by any law, ordinance, code or regulation which regulates construction, repair, replacement or use of any damaged or undamaged portions of the property. b. Property damage shall not include: 1.Loss by moth, vermin, termites or other insects; wear, tear or gradual deterioration; rust, wet or dry rot or mold, shrinkage, evaporation, loss of weight, or leakage unless caused by fire or firefighting; 2. Loss or damage caused by contamination unless directly resulting from fire or extended coverage perils, such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, windstorms, and hail; Page 5of 13 3. Loss resulting from dampness of atmosphere or variation in temperature unless caused by fire or extended coverage perils, such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, windstorms, and hail; 4. Loss of electrical appliances or devices of any kind, including wiring, arising from electrical injury or disturbance unless as a direct result of loss or damage caused by fire or extended coverage perils, such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, windstorms, and hail; 5. Loss to motor vehicles, aircraft, or watercraft including tires, caused by normal wear or tear, mechanical or electrical breakdown or failure or freezing; 6. Loss to property other than motor vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft by mechanical breakdown, including rupture or bursting by centrifugal force; 7. Loss to aircraft, standing timber, trees, shrubs, lawns, growing crops and livestock; 8. Unexplained loss or mysterious disappearance, or shortage disclosed upon taking inventory; and 9. Loss resulting from normal aging of equipment, buildings, or other property. (2) Workers' compensation. The county will pay workers' compensation benefits to employees and fire and rescue volunteers who are injured by accident or who develop an occupational disease caused by their employment or volunteer service when required by Title 65.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, hereinafter "theAct"). The employee must notify the county of any return to employment, increase in earnings, or recovery for injury from third parties and if the employee fails to so notify the county, the county's obligation to pay benefits will terminate. The county reserves its subrogation rights as provided in the act. Benefits shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of state law and provisions of county administrative regulations as promulgated by the county administrator. To be eligible for workers' compensation benefits, a volunteer firefighter must have been duly certified to the clerk of circuit court as required by section 27-42 of the Code of Virginia. This workers' compensation coverage does not apply to: a. Individuals not employed by the county; b. Persons providing services to the county as independent contractors; and c. Employees receiving medical treatment provided by a physician not listed in the county's physician list, except when (a) the nature of the illness or injury requires emergency medical services or (b) the employee is referred Page 6of 13 by a physician who is on the county's physician list to a physician who is not on the county's physician list; d. County officers, unless they are deemed to be covered "employees" under the Act; and e. All volunteers, except fire and rescue volunteers. (3) Automobile liability. The program will pay claims which a covered person is legally obligated to pay for negligent operation of a motor vehicle in the course of county business. However, if the covered person is driving a non-county owned vehicle on county business and is guilty of negligence, the program will only provide secondary coverage to the covered person's personal liability insurance over and above minimum amounts required by Virginia law, i.e., the program will pay for any claims against the covered person which exceed the limits of the covered person's personal insurance policy up to the program limit of liability. The program will not pay claims for any damage to any non-county owned vehicle operated by a covered person which is due to the negligence or intentional actions of that covered person. The program provides the statutory minimum limits for uninsured motorist coverage and specifically rejects coverage in excess of the statutorily mandated minimum. The limits of liability for uninsured and underinsured motorist liability coverage shall be the minimum amounts required by Virginia law, currently established as follows: twenty-five thousanddollars ($25,000.00) because of bodily injury to or death of any one person in any accident, and subject to the limit for one (1) person, to a limit of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) because of bodily injuries to or death of two (2) or more persons in any one (1) accident, and to a limit of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one (1) accident, or as may be hereafter established by law. The program's uninsured motorist coverage shall be secondary to any such coverage in the covered person's personal liability insurance policy or any other available uninsured motorist coverage. The program provides medical payments coverage only to the extent mandated in Code of Virginia Title 38.2. Theprogram will not pay collision and comprehensive damage claims for county owned or leased motor vehicles. These repair expenses or losses shall be the responsibility of the county department, agency, or officer to which the motor vehicle is assigned. (4)Comprehensive general liability including law enforcement legal liability and public officials' liability. The program will pay claims for liability imposed upon a covered person for personal injuries and property damage or loss because of the acts, errors or omissions of a covered person in the course of his duties on behalf of the county. Not included in this comprehensive general liability coverage are county employees whom the covered person may have injured in the course of their employment (because such employees have coverage under the workers' compensation section). Page 7of 13 (5) Medical services. The program will pay claims, if based solely on error, negligence, omission or mistake, arising out of medical services which were rendered or which should have been rendered by any duly qualified medical practitioner, nurse or technician employed by the county or acting at its request. The program will provide coverage only to the extent that the losses exceed the medical professional's other insurance coverage and to the extent of the program's limit of liability. (6) Faithful performance blanket bond liability. The program will indemnify the county for loss caused through failure of any county officer, volunteer or employee, acting alone or in collusion with others to perform faithfully his duties or to account properly for all monies and property received by virtue of his position or employment. (7) The program may, but is not obligated to, provide for a policy for payment of certain medical expenses incurred by approved volunteers, other than registered fire and rescue volunteers, for bodily injuries that occur during the course of approved volunteer projects in the county. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94; Ord. No. 022316-3, 2-23-16) Sec. 2-84. -Limitations on and exclusions from coverage. (a)Fydftt!dpwfsbhf/In no event shall the county indemnify the amount of any liability or loss for which there is any insurance in effect which covers such loss or which would have covered such loss except for the existence of this program. (b) Fydmvefe!bdut/The program will not pay for liability claims stemming from: (1) Damage to or destruction of property caused by the covered person to his or her own property; (2) Any willful malicious acts or any acts of intentional misconduct; (3) Any acts outside the scope of employment or business of the county; (4) Actions or inactions while under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs or the abuse of legal drugs; (5) Any claims for acts, omissions, or events occurring prior to July 1, 1994; (6) The exercise of eminent domain or condemnation; (7) Judgments for losses covered under the program when covered persons fail to notify the county attorney of court actions against them in sufficient time for the county attorney to file responsive pleadingsor when the covered person fails to cooperate in the preparation or presentation of his or her defense. The program will not pay claims for loss or damage in excess of the cost to repair or replace the damaged or destroyed property in a condition equal to its condition immediately before the loss or damage. If the county decides to replace destroyed or damaged property on another site, the cost of such site is excluded from coverage. Page 8of 13 (c) Mptt!pg!dpwfsbhf/A covered person shall not, except at his own cost and expense, make any payment, admit any liability, settle any claim, assume any obligation, or incur any expense without the written consent of the county risk manager. Any violation of this provision will result in a loss of coverage under the program. (d) Qvojujwf!ebnbhft/The program will not pay punitive damages awarded by a judge or jury against any covered person. (e) Xbjwfst-!bcsphbujpo/Nothing contained in this program shall be construed to abrogate or waive any defense of sovereign immunity, official immunity, governmental immunity, or any other defense available to the county, or any covered person. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) Sec. 2-85. -Procedures. The board of supervisors has authorized the establishment of the self-insurance trustees committee ("the trustees"). The trustees shall provide general oversight to successfully implement the program. The risk manager will administer the program under the following procedures: (1) Sfqpsujoh!pg!dmbjnt<!xsjuufo!opujdf/Upon the happening of any occurrence which may be covered by the county's insurance, written notice containing the identity of the person seeking coverage or indemnification under this program, information regarding the time, place, and circumstances of the occurrence, and the names and addresses of (1) all injured persons, (2) the owner of any damaged property and (3) all witnesses whose identities are known or can be reasonably determined shall be given as soon as practicable by the person seeking coverage or indemnification under this program to the risk manager. Any person seeking coverage or indemnification under this program and who is no longer employed by or otherwise providing service to the county shall also provide the risk manager with his or her name, address and work and home telephone numbers and shall further be required to up-date information on how he or she can be contacted by the risk manager when necessary. (2) Sfqpsujoh!pg!dmbjnt<!tfswjdf!pg!qspdftt/If a claim is made or an action is brought against coverage or person as a result of any occurrence which may be subject to indemnification under the county's insurance or the program, that person shall immediately notify the county attorney in writing and forward to the county attorney every demand, notice, summons, or other process received by the covered person or his representative. (3) Dppqfsbujpo/All persons seeking indemnification under the program shall cooperate with the county and, upon the county's request, assist in making settlements, in the conduct of lawsuits, and in enforcing any right of contribution, subrogation, indemnification, or any other claim which the county or the covered person may have against any other person who may be liable to Page 9of 13 any covered person. That person shall attend hearings, depositions, trials and other proceedings and shall assist in securing and giving evidence and obtaining the attendance of witnesses. No such person shall make any payment, assume any obligation or incur any expense, without prior approval by the county attorney. Such action without county attorney approval shall void any coverageor indemnification under this plan relating to the occurrence. No person may disapprove a proposed settlement of a suit, action, or claim against him if the county attorney determines that such settlement is in the legal or management interests of the county or its officers, employees or volunteers. In the event an employee has the option to disapprove a settlement and disapproves such proposed settlement, any indemnification afforded under this program shall be void for the occurrence for which the settlement was disapproved. (4) Gbjmvsf!up!hjwf!opujdf!ps!dppqfsbuf/The county shall not provide coverage or indemnification for any person with respect to any loss for which that person fails to comply with all provisions of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this section. (5) Efgfotf!pg!dmbjnt/The county attorney shall represent all persons or entities with respect to any claim or causes of action arising from the conduct of such individuals or entities in the discharge of their duties on behalf of the county. (6) Dpogmjdu!pg!joufsftu/In the event of (1) a real or potential conflict of interest involving the county attorney's representation of the county or related entity or any individual under this plan, on any claim, lawsuit or combination of claims or lawsuits or (2) any other ethical consideration, which might impede effective representation and legal defense by the county attorney, the county attorney is authorized to retain outside or additional counsel, to represent any such persons or entities whoshall in his opinion require such counsel. The program shall bear the cost of such counsel. (7) Bvuipsjuz!up!ijsf!fyqfsut/After consulting with each other, the risk manager and county attorney are authorized to retain experts to assist in the investigation, valuation, or settlement of claims, and to testify at the trial of such claims against persons and entities provided coverage or indemnification under the program. The costs and expenses of such experts shall be borne by the program. (8) Tvcsphbujpo!sjhiut!sftfswfe!cz!uif!dpvouz/ a. If a covered person receives a payment from another source for a loss which is also covered by the program, the program has the right to recover from the covered person any amounts paid by the program which have been paid from another source. b. A recovery made pursuant to subrogation will be applied to reduce the loss for which the county has made payment or otherwise incurred expenses. (9) Qvsdibtf!pg!jotvsbodf/The risk manager shall recommend to the trustees the purchase of such insurance or participation in group self-insurance pools as may be appropriate to provide coverage or such additional coverages to the Page 10of 13 extent that loss exposure exceeds the reasonable capacity of the self-insurance fund to afford adequate coverage. The trustees on behalf of the county may contract, subject to the provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, for insurance, reinsurance or participate in group self-insurance pools. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) Sec. 2-86. -Administration of risk management internal service fund. (a) Hfofsbmmz/The department of risk management shall be responsible for administering this program. (b) Dmbjnt!qspdfevsft/The department of risk management shall administratively handle claims made against the county. The county may contract, subject to the provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, with third parties for the provision of claims services. The risk manager shall develop and implement comprehensive claims procedures. (c) Dmbjnt!bekvtunfou-!bvuipsjuz!mfwfm/The risk management department will provide claims administration services through its own staff or through the services of an independent third party claims administration organization. The risk management department will have authority to adjust claims when it is in the best interest of the county for the risk management department to do so. Generally, but not in all cases, it is in the best interest of the county for the risk management department to adjust claims which donot exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) so long as the adjustment of such claim involves no policy or management implications. For claims from ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), the risk manager will obtain prior approval of the trustees prior to adjusting the claim. If any claim involves policy or management issues, the claim will only be adjusted in conjunction with the county attorney and when necessary, the county administrator. The risk management departmentshall not adjust any claim when the county attorney is aware of the claim and believes that administrative adjustment is contrary to the legal or management interests of the county. Claims in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) must be reviewed and approved by the trustees and the board of supervisors. The risk manager will provide the board of supervisors with a quarterly summary of all claims paid from the fund. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) Sec. 2-87. -Management of funds. Recognizing the importance of maintaining the financial integrity of the self- insurance fund, the county hereby establishes the following general procedures regarding the administration of the fund: (1) Jowftunfout-!fbsojoht!po!jowftunfout-!fud/The investment of moneys held in the self-insurance fund is authorized in accordance with the general investment policies and practices of the county. The moneys to be invested may be pooled Page 11of 13 with other county moneys for the purpose of investment. The county treasurer shall make provision for the prompt payment of all liquidated claims, settlements, and final judgments from the self-insurance fund and shall invest the moneys of the fund in a manner that allows access to said moneys for such purposes. (2) Bddpvout!boe!sfdpset!tztufnt/The director of finance, in consultation with the treasurer, shall develop and maintain within the self-insurance fund such accounts and records as will provide a reasonable segregation and determination of assets and liabilities, necessary to sustain accurate and proper accounting practices. The risk manager shall develop and maintain the historical loss data and other information necessary for the management of this program. The accounts and records system shall include development of an appropriate claims reserve procedure. (3) Tvqqmfnfoubm!bqqspqsjbujpot/The board of supervisors shall appropriate and budget sufficient moneys to assure the solvency of the self-insurance fund and the effective management and operation of the self-insurance program. The trustees shall, from time-to-time, recommend such additional appropriations or budget amendments as may be required to assure the solvency of the fund. (4) Usbotgfs!qspijcjufe/No money shall be transferred into or out of the self- insurance fund except as hereby authorized. (5) Fyqfoejuvsft/All authorized and approved payments of covered losses under this program and all premiums for commercial third-party insurance shall be paid from the self-insurance fund. Additionally, all costs and expenses of operating and administering the fund and the department of risk management shall be paid from the fund. (6) Jowftunfou!jodpnf/All income generated by the investment of the monies in the self-insurance fund shall be added to the fund. (7) Sfdpwfsjft/Any amounts recovered on a claim, suit or action by any covered individual recovered through subrogation, indemnification, insurance, or otherwise up to the amount of any covered loss for which the program is liable or which has been covered by the fund shall be immediately paid into the fund. (8) Mptt!qsfwfoujpo/The risk management department will provide loss prevention services through its own staff. The risk management department may also supplement the loss prevention services provided by its staff with the services of an independent loss prevention organization in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. (9) Sftfswft/The program shall establish financial reserves up to the limit of any retention or any excess policies. (Ord. No. 61494-6, § 1, 6-14-94) Secs. 2-88—2-100. -Reserved. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 12of 13 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 ORDINANCE 082818-8AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE (APPENDIX A TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE) DEALING WITH AGRITOURISM ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the 2014 General Assembly of Virginia enacted, and the Governor signed into law, Section 15.2-2288.6of the Code of Virginia, a provision that highlights and protects certain rights of agricultural operations engaged in the bona fide cultivation and harvesting of agricultural products; and WHEREAS, the rights of owners of bona fide agricultural operations include the right to conduct on-site agritourism activities, the sale of certain specified products incidental to the agricultural operation, the preparation, processing of certain specified food productsand activities that are usual and customary on agricultural operations; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County continues to recognize that agricultural activities including agritourism are an integral component of the County’s economy and that maintaining the continued vitality of agriculture is necessary to achieve and preserve a balanced tax base and a diverse, healthy economy benefiting all of the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that, as with any new statutory initiative, a general framework for supporting and addressing agritourism activities will assistCounty Staff andcitizens; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2018, and the second reading and public hearing were held on August 28, 2018. Page 1of 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that 1.Thebelow sections (or portions of sections) of theRoanoke County ZoningOrdinance arehereby amendedto read and provide as follows(all sections or portions of sections not set forth below shall remain in effect without change): ARTICLE II –DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-29. USE TYPES; GENERALLY. Sec. 30-29-1. Agricultural and Forestry Use Types. Bhsjupvsjtn:Any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest- your-own activities, or natural activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity. Gbsn!csfxfsz: An establishment located on one or more lotsin Roanoke County licensed as a limited brewery under Section 4.1-208 of the Code of Virginia. Gbsn!ejtujmmfsz: An establishment locatedon one or more lotsin Roanoke County to which a limited distiller’s license is issued under Section 4.1-206of the Code of Virginia. Gbsn!xjofsz: An establishment located on one or more lotsin Roanoke County licensed as a farm winery under Section 4.1-207of the Code of Virginia. ARTICLE III –DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32. AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT. Sec. 30-32-2. Permitted Uses. (A)The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1.Bhsjdvmuvsbm!boe!Gpsftusz!Vtft Page 2of 7 Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery* Farm Winery * SEC. 30-33. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT. Sec. 30-33-2. Permitted Uses. (A)The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicatesadditional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1.Bhsjdvmuvsbm!boe!Gpsftusz!Vtft Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-2. Permitted Uses. (A)The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1.Bhsjdvmuvsbm!boe!Gpsftusz!Vtft! Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * Page 3of 7 SEC. 30-36. AV AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT. Sec. 30-36-2. Permitted Uses. (A)The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1.Bhsjdvmuvsbm!boe!Gpsftusz!Vtft! Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * ARTICLE IV –USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-81. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES. Sec. 30-81-1.5. Agritourism. (A)Agritourism activities shall be considered by-right usesunless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. If the zoning administrator determines that the agritourism activities will have a substantial impact on the health,safety, or general welfare of the public, a special use permit shall be required. (B)Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by Section 13-21(6) of the County Code (Noise Ordinance). 30-81-2.5. Farm Brewery. (A)Accessory uses may include, but are not limited to, tasting rooms, gift shops, offices,retail sales of alcoholic beverages manufactured on site, food sales and service, and facility tours. (B) Events may be conducted at a farm brewery on one or more days, where the purpose is agritourism or to promote beer sales, and which may be, but is not limited to, festivals; receptions; weddings; reunions; anniversary and birthday celebrations; club meetings and activities; tasting educational seminars; tasting luncheons or dinners; business meetings; corporate gatherings; agritourism promotions; and fundraisers and charity events. Page 4of 7 (C)Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by Section 13-21(6) of the County Code (Noise Ordinance). 30-81-2.6. Farm Distillery. (A)Accessory uses may include, but are not limited to, tasting rooms, gift shops, offices, retail sales of alcoholic beverages manufactured on site, food sales and service, and facility tours. (B) Events may be conducted at a farm distillery on one or more days, where the purpose is agritourism or to promote the sale of distilled spirits, and which may be, but is not limited to, festivals; receptions; weddings; reunions; anniversary and birthday celebrations; club meetings and activities; tasting educational seminars; tasting luncheons or dinners; business meetings; corporate gatherings; agritourism promotions; and fundraisers and charity events. (C)Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by Section 13-21(6) of the County Code (Noise Ordinance). Sec. 30-81-3.5. Farm Winery. (A)Accessory uses may include, but are not limited to, tasting rooms, gift shops, offices, retail sales of alcoholic beverages manufactured on site, food sales and service, and facility tours. (B) Events may be conducted at a farm winery on one or more days, where the purpose is agritourism or to promote wine sales, and which may be, but is not limited to, festivals; receptions; weddings; reunions; anniversary and birthday celebrations; club meetings and activities; tasting educational seminars; tasting luncheons or dinners; business meetings; corporate gatherings; agritourism promotions; and fundraisers and charity events. (C)Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by Section 13-21(6) of the County Code (Noise Ordinance). SEC. 30-85. COMMERCIAL USES Sec. 30-85-24.6. Special Events Facility. (A)General Standards: 1.The site shall front directly on and have direct access to a publicly owned and maintained street. Page 5of 7 2.When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type. 2.Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by Section 13-21(6) of the County Code (Noise Ordinance). ARTICLE V –DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEC. 30-91.OFF STREET PARKING, STACKING AND LOADING. Sec. 30-91-3. Number of Parking Spaces Required. Sec. 30-91-3,3. Minimum Parking Required. USE TYPEPARKING REQUIRED Bhsjdvmuvsbm!boe!Gpsftusz!Vtf!Uzqft (A) AgricultureNo requirement AgritourismNo requirement Commercial FeedlotsNo requirement Farm BrewerySee Schedule B Farm DistillerySee Schedule B Farm Employee Housing2 spaces per dwelling unit Farm WinerySee Schedule B Forestry OperationsNo requirement Stable, PrivateNo requirement Stable, Commmercial1 space per employee, plus 1 space for every 4 animals stabled Wayside Stand1 space per 100 sq. ft., 3 spaces minimum Sec. 30-91-4. Parking Area Design Standards. Sec. 30-91-4.3. Parking Area Surface Standards. (A)All off-street parking and stacking areas, except for those required for single family and two family dwellings or agricultural and forestry use types, shall be graded for drainage and surfaced with concrete, asphalt, bituminous pavement, brick or stone pavers, or a permeable or pervious surface in accordance with the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Where permeable or pervious pavers are used, when required by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code ADA- compliant pavers shall be utilized. 1.Within the Clearbrook village overlay district, any parking areas or parking spaces provided in excess of the minimum requirements of this ordinance, shall be constructed with a permeable or pervious pavement material in Page 6of 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-9ADOPTINGTHE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REVIEW OF AGRITOURISM ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, at Title 15.2, Section 15.2- 2288.6 Agricultural Operations; Local Regulation of Certain Activities addresses the regulatory arrangement in the Commonwealth of Virginia as to agritourism; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County continues to recognize that agricultural activities including agritourism are an integral component of the County’s economy andthat maintaining the continued vitality of agriculture is necessary to achieve and preserve a balanced tax base and a diverse, healthyeconomy benefiting all of the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia has enacted Section 15.2-2286.6 of the Code of Virginia, which prohibits a locality fromregulating 1 the followingactivities at an agricultural operationunless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public: 1.“Agritourism activities,” which are defined in Section3.2-6400 of the Code of Virginiaas “any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest-your-own activities, or 2 ”Bhsjdvmuvsbm!pqfsbujpo•!nfbot!boz!pqfsbujpo!efwpufe!up!uif!cpob!gjef!qspevdujpo!pg!dspqt-!ps!bojnbmt-!ps!gpxm! jodmvejoh!uif!qspevdujpo!pg!gsvjut!boe!wfhfubcmft!pg!bmm!ljoet<!nfbu-!ebjsz-!boe!qpvmusz!qspevdut<!ovut-!upcbddp-! ovstfsz-!boe!gmpsbm!qspevdut<!boe!uif!qspevdujpo!boe!ibswftu!pg!qspevdut!gspn!tjmwjdvmuvsf!bdujwjuz/Dpef!pg!Wjshjojb! Tfd/!4/3.411/! Page 1of 4 natural activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity”; 2.The sale of agricultural or silvicultural products, or the sale of agricultural- related or silvicultural-related items incident to the agricultural operation; 3.The preparation, processing, or sale of food products in compliance with subdivisions A 3, 4, and 5 of § 3.2-5130 or related state laws and regulations; or 4.Other activities or events that are usual and customary at Virginia agricultural operations; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2288.6(A) of the Code ofVirginia further mandates that “any local restriction placed on an activity listed above shall be reasonable and shall take into account the economic impact of the restriction of the agricultural operation and the agricultural nature of the activity”; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2288.6(B) of the Code of Virginia further states that “no locality shall require a special exception or special use permit for any activity listed above on property that is zoned as an agricultural district or classification unless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public”; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2288.6(C) of the Code of Virginia further states that that“except regarding the sound generated by outdoor amplified music, no local ordinance regulating the sound generated by any activity listed above shall be more restrictive than the general noise ordinance of the locality, however in permitting outdoor amplified music at an agricultural operation, the locality shall consider the effect on adjoining property owners and nearby residents”; and Page 2of 4 WHEREAS, presently there are no written factors, mechanism, or procedures for the County’s Zoning Administratorto evaluate whether a specific activity as described above as engaged in by an individual or entity imposes a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public; NOW THEREFORE BE ITRESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanokethat: 1.Roanoke County will request those engaging in agritourism activities to declare theirintent to do so by filing(with the Zoning Administrator)the attached Declarationand DeterminationForm, found at AttachmentAto this Resolution, which form may be updatedfrom time to timeby the County Zoning Administrator. 2.The Zoning Administrator will review these matters administratively on a case-by- case, individual basis in accordance with the factors and criteria set forth on the Declaration andDeterminationForm.The Zoning Administrator will first determine whether the proposed activity constitutes agritourism. If the Zoning Administrator finds that the proposed activity is an agritourism activity, he will then determine whether the proposed agritourism activitywillhave a substantial impact on the health, safety or welfare of the general public. Activities found to have such an impactshall require approval of a specialuse permit in accordance with Section 30-19 fu!tfr.of the Roanoke CountyZoning Ordinance prior to commencing the activity. 3.Recognizing that the scope and impact of activitiesmay change over time,the Zoning Administrator shall have the discretion to reconsider and reverse his prior Page 3of 4 ACTION NO. A-082818-10.a ITEM NO. J-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:August 28, 2018 AGENDA ITEM:Request to accept and allocate grantfunds in the amount of $5,422.30 from the U. S. Department of Justice's Bulletproof Vest Partnership SUBMITTED BY:Eric Orange Sheriff APPROVED BY:Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Acceptance and allocation of $5,422.30 for the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant BACKGROUND: The Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP), created by the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998, is a unique U. S. Department of Justice initiative designed to provide a critical resource to State and local law enforcement. DISCUSSION: The Roanoke County Sheriff's Office applied for and received the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant which provides funding to assist in the purchase of protective vests. Additional grant funds were received in the amountof $5,422.30 and need to be accepted and allocated. FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount of the grant awarded is $5,422.30, which includes a 50% match. U.S. Department of Justice grant funds total $2,711.15 and the County match of $2,711.15 was appropriatedby the Board of Supervisors in the Sheriff's Office budget. No additional appropriation of County funds is required. Page 1of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to the Sheriff's Office in the amount of $5,422.30 from the U.S. Department of Justice's Bulletproof Vest Partnership. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to appropriate funds.Supervisor McNamara seconded the motion. Motion approved. YesNoAbsent Mr. Assaid Mr. North Mr. McNamara Mr. Peters Ms. Hooker cc:Eric Orange, Sheriff Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2of 2 ACTION NO. A-082818-10.b ITEM NO. J-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:August 28, 2018 AGENDA ITEM:Request to donate surplus vehicle tothe Western Virginia Emergency Medical Services (EMS) council SUBMITTED BY:Rob Light Director of General Services APPROVED BY:Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: A request to donate a surplus Roanoke County vehicle to the Western Virginia EMS Council BACKGROUND: From time to time, other local governmental/not for profit agencies have requested the donation of surplus vehicles from Roanoke County, and the County has generally honored these requests. The Western Virginia EMS Councilis a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, which has served the Roanoke Valley since 1975 and is an integral part of Virginia' s comprehensive EMS system. It serves to assess, identify, coordinate, plan and implement efficient and effective regional EMS delivery systems in partnership with Virginia's Office of Emergency Medical Services and EMS Advisory Board. DISCUSSION: The Council uses the Roanoke County Fleet Service Center to repair its vehicles, and is requesting that the County donate a surplus 2010Ford Crown Victoria with over 103,000 miles for its use. It is anticipated that the vehicle will be used for agency staff during the course of daily operations, such as meetings, EMS training programs, drills, exercises, etc., saving the agency the cost of staff using personal vehicles. There is no internal need for the vehicle. Page 1of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: While there is no direct cost to the County, the value of the vehicle at surplus is estimated to be approximately $2,000 to $2,500. Due to the age and mileage ofthis vehicle, there is not a high resale value and that value will not be significantly impacted through the Western Virginia EMS Council's use. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends donation of the 2010 Ford Crown Victoria to the Western Virginia EMS Council. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to surplus the vehicle.Supervisor McNamara seconded the motion. Motion approved. YesNoAbsent Mr. Assaid Mr. North Mr. McNamara Mr. Peters Ms. Hooker cc:Rob Light, Director of General Services Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2of 2 ACTION NO. A-082818-10.c ITEM NO. J.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:August 28, 2018 AGENDA ITEM:Request to accept and appropriate grant funds inthe amount of $60,000 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit SUBMITTED BY:Howard B. Hall Chief of Police APPROVED BY:Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $60,000 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program (HIDTA). BACKGROUND: The HIDTA funds were provided to the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit to identify organized drug trafficking organizations and, when possible, to prosecute the cases as drug trafficking conspiracies. Roanoke County Police Department serves as the lead agency and the Roanoke County Department of Finance serves as fiscal agent. DISCUSSION: TheRoanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit received a commitment of funding from HIDTA in the amount of $60,000 for the 2018 calendar year. These funds will be used to continue to support investigations of drug trafficking organizations that are operating in the greater Roanoke Valley. FISCAL IMPACT: No matching funds are required by the County. Grant is one hundred percent (100%) Federal funds. Page 1of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $60,000 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to appropriate funds.Supervisor McNamara seconded the motion. Motion approved. YesNoAbsent Mr. Assaid Mr. North Mr. McNamara Mr. Peters Ms. Hooker cc:Howard B. Hall, Chief of Police Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2of 2 ACTION NO. A-082818-10.d ITEM NO. J.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:August 28, 2018 AGENDA ITEM:Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $95,540.64 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-For-Life" distribution SUBMITTED BY:Stephen G. Simon Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY:Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Acceptance andallocation of $95,540.64 for the "Four-For-Life" program from the Virginia Department of Health (VDOH) Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS). BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Health (VDOH) Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS), has awarded the Fire and Rescue Department grant funds totaling $95,540.64 as part of the "Four-for-Life" program funding. "Four-for-Life" funding is legislated by the Code of Virginia §46.2-694 and provides various grant programs to be used only for EMS purposes. The "Four-for-Life" program, as amended in 2000, stipulates that four (4) additional dollars be charged and collected at the time of registration of each passenger vehicle, pickup or panel truck. Funds may be utilized for training, equipment and supplies for licensed, non-profit emergency medical service agencies. DISCUSSION: This grant awarded to the Roanoke County Department of Fire and Rescue will be utilized to purchase Emergency Medical Service (EMS) equipment that meets state guidelines. Approval of this grant funding from VDOH is dependent upon appropriate Page 1of 2 and timely submission of required annual reporting. The Roanoke County Department of Fire and Rescue continues to meet those annual requirements to remain eligible for grant funding. FISCAL IMPACT: Awarded grant funds from the "Four-for-Life" program total $95,540.64. There is no County match required with acceptance of this grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to the Fire and Rescue Department in the amount of $95,540.64 from the Virginia Department of Health Office of Emergency Medical Services. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to appropriate funds.Supervisor McNamara seconded the motion. Motion approved. YesNoAbsent Mr. Assaid Mr. North Mr. McNamara Mr. Peters Ms. Hooker cc:Stephen G. Simon, Chief of Fire and Rescue Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY,AUGUST 28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-10.eREQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LILA DRIVE TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS,the Salem Residency Office of the Virginia Department of Transportation recommends that Lila Drive be added to the secondary system of state highways as a no cost rural addition pursuant to Section 33.2-705 and Commonwealth Transportation Board policy, because the street meets current minimum standards, the condition of the existing hard surface is serviceable, and the street has provided continuous public service since its establishment in 1958; and WHEREAS, the Salem Residency Office of the Virginia Department of Transportation confirms that no Department funds are required to improve the street described on the attached additions form AM-4.3 to meet current minimum design or maintenance standards of the Department; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street described on the attached additions form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.2-705, Code of Virginia and Rural Addition Policy of the Commonwealth Transportation Board of the Virginia Department of Transportation Page 1of 2 ACTION NO. A-082818-10.f ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:August 28, 2018 AGENDA ITEM:Confirmation of appointment to the Chief Local Elected Officials Consortium (CLEO) (At-Large); Economic Development Authority (EDA) (District); Social Services Advisory Board (At-Large) SUBMITTED BY:Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY:Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointments DISCUSSION: Chief Local Elected Officials Consortium (CLEO) (At-Large): During the closed session held on August 8, 2018, it was the consensus of the Board of Supervisors to appoint Martha B. Hooker and P. Jason Peters (Alternate) to the above Consortium. There is no term limit to these appointments. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (District): Supervisor Phil C. North has recommended the reappointment of Max Beyer to this Authority for an additional four-year term to expire September 21, 2022. Social Services Advisory Board (At-Large): The consensus of the Board of Supervisors is to recommend the reappointment of Martha B. Hooker to an additional four-year term to expire July 31, 2022. Page 1of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with these appointments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION There is no staff recommendation associated with these appointments. VOTE: Supervisor Peters moved to confirm the appointments.Supervisor McNamara seconded the motion. Motion approved. YesNoAbsent Mr. Assaid Mr. North Mr. McNamara Mr. Peters Ms. Hooker cc:Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development Joyce Earl, Director of Social Services Candace Martin, Virginia Career Works Page 2of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 282018 RESOLUTION 082818-10.gEXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TOBARRY K. AGNEW,HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT,UPON HISRETIREMENT AFTERELEVEN (11)YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS,Mr.Agnew wasemployed by Roanoke County on July 17, 2007; and WHEREAS,Mr.Agnew retiredonAugust 1, 2018, after elevenyearsofdevoted, faithful and expertserviceto Roanoke County; and WHEREAS,during Mr. Agnew’stenure with theHuman ResourcesDepartment, he served as aHuman Resources Consultantand servedwith professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS,Mr. Agnew was responsible for various revisions and maintenance to the County’s classification and compensation systems, ensuring that County employees were rewarded as fairly and equitably as possible for their work on behalf of the citizens, even during times of economic downturn; and WHEREAS, during his time with the County, he assisted with implementation of many initiatives, including a new on-line hiring system, several upgrades of the HR/Payroll System, improvements to the records retention software, application of the Affordable Care Act requirements to the County, and creation of the County’s wellness clinic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County toBARRY K. AGNEWfor eleven years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-10.hEXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TOWILLIAM M. LOUTHIANPOLICE OFFICER,UPON HISRETIREMENT AFTER EIGHTEEN (18)YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS,Mr. Louthianwasemployed by Roanoke County on September 30th, 2000; and WHEREAS,Mr. LouthianretiredonAugust1st, 2018, after eighteen yearsof devoted, faithful and expertserviceto Roanoke County; and WHEREAS,during Mr. Louthian’stenure with the Police Department, he has served as aPolice Officer and as a Community Service Officer, where heservedwith professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; WHEREAS, Mr. Louthianwas a valued employee throughout his tenure at the Police Department. Mr. Louthianserved the community with passion and professionalism that have been recognized by his peers, supervisors, and by citizens that he had interacted with throughout his career. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County toWILLIAM M. LOUTHIAN for eighteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER,the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-10.iEXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TORANDALL S. SPENCE,BATTALION CHIEF-OPERATIONS,UPON HISRETIREMENT AFTER THIRTY (30)YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS,ChiefSpencewasemployed by Roanoke County on May6, 1985; and again on December 10, 2001; and WHEREAS,ChiefSpence retiredonJuly1, 2018,after thirtyyearsand six months ofdevoted, faithful and expertserviceto Roanoke County; and WHEREAS,during ChiefSpence’stenure with Roanoke County’s Fire and Rescue Departmentheserved as aFirefighter, Sergeant, Fire Lieutenant, Fire Inspector, Deputy Fire Marshal, Fire Captain and Battalion Chief-Operations,andservedwith professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; WHEREAS,Chief Spence was a certified law enforcement officer while a Deputy Fire Marshal and was in charge of many significant arson related investigations that he was able to close throughoutstanding investigative work; and WHEREAS, Chief Spence was a trusted member of the Department’s Senior Staff and helped chart the direction of the Department for years to come. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County toRANDALL S. SPENCEfor more than thirtyyears of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER,the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 1of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY,AUGUST 28, 2018 RESOLUTION 082818-10APPROVINGAND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORSAGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J-CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 28, 2018,designated as Item J-Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through10 inclusive, as follows: 1.Approval of minutes –June 12, 2018 2.Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $5,422.30 from the U. S. Department of Justice's Bulletproof Vest Partnership 3.Request to donate surplus vehicle to the Western Virginia Emergency Medical Services (EMS) council 4.Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amountof $60,000 from the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program to the Roanoke County Police Department for the Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Unit 5.Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $95,540.64 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-For-Life" distribution 6.Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Lila Drive to the State Secondary Road System 7.Confirmation of appointment to the Chief Local Elected Officials Consortium (CLEO) (At-Large); Economic Development Authority (EDA) (District); Social Services Advisory Board (At-Large) 8.Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Barry K. Agnew, Human Resources Consultant, upon his retirement after eleven (11) years of service Page 1of 2