Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5/10/2022 - Regular
Page 1 of 5 INVOCATION: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: “Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board.” Roanoke County Board of Supervisors May 10, 2022 Page 2 of 5 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for May 10, 2022. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Ch annel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are closed-captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the month of May 2022 as Business Appreciation Month in Roanoke County (Marshall Stanley, Economic Development Specialist) 2. Resolution congratulating Evan Rogers, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the Virginia High School (VHSL) Class 3 State Forensics Championship in the Storytelling category (David F. Radford, Windsor Hills Supervisor) 3. Resolution congratulating J. B. Dragovich, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 3A Championship in the 120 lb. Weight Division in Wrestling (David F. Radford, Supervisor, Windsor Hills Magisterial District) Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda May 10, 2022 Page 3 of 5 4. Resolution congratulating the Cave Spring High School Boys Basketball Team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 3A Championship (Paul M. Mahoney, Chairman, Board of Supervisors) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution adopting the fiscal year 2022-2023 operating budget, the fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget, and the fiscal year 2023 -2032 Capital Improvement Program for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools (Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services) E. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance designating Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land (Tax Map Number 076.01-01-07.00-0000) (Lindsay Webb, Parks, Planning and Development Manager) 2. Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $250 from Earle and Glenna Mackenzie for the County of Roanoke Fire & Rescue Department (C. Travis Griffith, Chief of Fire and Rescue) F. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinances to appropriate funds for: (a) Fiscal year 2022-2023 operations budget and approval of the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023 for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (b) Fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (c) Fiscal year 2022-2023 transfer to and on behalf of the Roanoke County Public Schools budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia (d) Fiscal year 2022-2023 operations budget for Roanoke County Public Schools; and (e) Fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget for Roanoke County Public Schools (Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services) 2. Ordinance dissolving a lease with Blue Mountain Huts, LLC to provide camping accommodations in Explore Park (Doug Blount, Assistant County Administrator) 3. Ordinance increasing the technology fee assessed on transactions processed by the Roanoke County Departments of Planning and Zoning and Development Services (Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney) Page 4 of 5 G. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 2 (Administration), Article 1 (In General), Section 2-5 (Library fines and fees) of the Roanoke County Code (Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 7 (Building Regulations), Article V (Fees), Sections 7-73 (Miscellaneous Fees) and 7-75 (Fee for Cross Connection Inspection) of the Roanoke County Code (Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney) 3. The petition of Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 4038, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) 4. The petition of WECO LLC to obtain a special use permit to operate a short -term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R -1, Low Density Residential District, located at 910 Paint Bank Road, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) 5. The petition of Wild Partners to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on 1.03 acres on property zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3250 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Library Board (appointed by District) 2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District) 3. Roanoke County Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) 4. Roanoke County Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes – January 25, 2022 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $101,164.96 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-For-Life" distribution Page 5 of 5 3. Confirmation of appointment to the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA)(At-Large) 4. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Craig V. Pendleton, Firefighter/EMT, upon his retirement after more than nineteen (19) years of service J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 2022 4. Proclamations signed by Chairman – Guillain-Barre Syndrome Awareness Month L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. David F. Radford 2. P. Jason Peters 3. Martha B. Hooker 4. Phil C. North 5. Paul M. Mahoney M. WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint work session with the Roanoke County Planning Commission to discuss Route 419 Town Center Design Guidelines (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) N. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: 1. Section 2.2-3711(A) (3) of the Code of Virginia, to discuss or consider the acquisition of real property, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body. Specifically, the Board will consider the acquisition of potential property in the City of Salem to be used for parking purposes. O. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION P. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation declaring the month of May 2022 as Bus iness Appreciation Month in Roanoke County SUBMITTED BY: Jill Loope Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: The Economic Development Department is requesting the Board of Supervisors declar e the month of May 2022 as Business Appreciation Month in Roanoke County BACKGROUND: This month recognizes all businesses for their contributions to fostering an attractive and prosperous economic environment in Roanoke County DISCUSSION: Dr. Donald W. Kees, Interim Chair, Carilion Clinic Department of Pediatrics will be present to accept the proclamation on behalf of the Roanoke County business community. Carilion Children’s Tanglewood Center is a hub for over 15 pediatric services, providing out-patient care in specialties such as General Pediatrics, Neurology, Gastroenterology, Behavioral Health, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and more. The Tanglewood Center also provides adult services such as Ear, Nose and Throat and Dentistry. Carilion Children’s Tanglewood Center comprises over 150,000 square feet of the former JCPenney space. Approximately 300 Carilion employees work at the center delivering pediatric health services to patients within its 60 -mile radius service territory including Roanoke County. Page 2 of 2 Carilion Children’s is a strong anchor tenant in Tanglewood, which continues to encourage other businesses to join the momentum and bring investment power back to the area. The 419 Town Center has begun to take shape as we see restaurants, office buildings, and redevelopment projects happening along the 419 corridor. We thank Carilion Children’s for helping inspire investment and action in the area. Carilion Children’s is a champion of economic development in Roanoke County, has helped reinvigorate the 419 corridor and serves our community and neighbors who have healthcare needs. Thank you Dr. Kees and your team at Carilion Children’s Tanglewood Center. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proclamation DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY 2022 AS BUSINESS APPRECIATION MONTH IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is proud to have a dynamic base of business and industry which contributes to an emergent local economy: and WHEREAS, these business partners create wealth in the County of Roanoke by capital investment and the creation of essential employment opportunities for Roanoke citizens; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke recognizes that existing businesses play a crucial role in sustaining the economic well-being, and in building a prosperous community through charitable, civic and philanthropic contributions; and WHEREAS, the Board wishes to acknowledge the leadership role embodied by the entire existing business community, express its respect and convey to these business partners the esteem in which they are held. NOW THEREFORE, we, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2022, as BUSINESS APPRECIATION MONTH in the County of Roanoke; and FURTHER, by this proclamation give notice to our citizens that we recognize the accomplishments and resilience of our existing businesses; entrepreneurs; small, minority and women-owned businesses; and the major employers that contribute greatly to our economic vitality and the well-being of our citizens. Presented this 1 oth day of May 2022 Martha B. Hooker Phil C. North ~~ L;~-~#7/ Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution congratulating Evan Rogers, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the Virginia High School (VHSL) Class 3 State Forensics Championship in the Storytelling category SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside to congratulate Evan Rogers for winning the VHSL Class 3 State Forensics Championship in the Storytelling category. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2021 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING EVAN ROGERS, HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL, FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) FORENSICS STORYTELLING CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, athletic competitions are an important and integral part of the team curriculum at schools in Roanoke County; teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, teamwork and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, Evan Rogers won the State Championship in Forensics Storytelling; and WHEREAS, Forensics is considered to be a Virginia High School League sport and entrails competitive public speaking. Students select material for individual performances. Categories include areas such as dramatic performance, formal speeches, impromptu speaking, poetry, and storytelling. The requirements for storytelling include a 10 -minute presentation of a fully memorized children’s story, and is judged based on selection, interpretation, pronunciation, timing, enunciation, eye contact, posture, gestures, voice, poise, appearance, energy level, vocal and facial expressions, appeal to children, characterization, and impact of the message and performance ; and WHEREAS, Ms. Rogers is also a Scholastic Art Award Gold Key Portfolio winner. She was one of less than 30% of entries at the regional level to receive an award for her art portfolio. The Scholastic Art Awards are the longest and most prestigious st udent art awards in the country; and WHEREAS, Ms. Rogers also placed third in the Future Business Leaders of America Digital Video Production category at the state level and will travel to Chicago in Page 2 of 2 June to compete at the national level. WHEREAS, Ms. Rogers is a member of the English Honors Society; a Senior Mentor; starting catcher for the Hidden Valley varsity softball team; member of the High Altitude Balloon Club; Assistant Producer of Senior Video through the Mass Communications program at the Burton Center for Arts & Technology; and upon graduation will receive an Advanced Diploma and will be attending Virginia Tech in the fall, majoring in Cinema. W HEREAS, Ms. Rogers represented her school and community with great character, poise and sportsmanship. She is a true asset to Roanoke County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to EVAN ROGERS, State Champion in Forensics-Storytelling; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Ms. Evans, her coaches and the school in their future endeavors. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution congratulating J. B. Dragovich, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 3A Championship in the 120 lb. Weight Division in Wrestling SUBMITTED BY: David F. Radford Chairman APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside to congratulate J. B. Dragovich for winning the VHSL Class 3A Championship in the 120 lb. Weight Division in Wrestling. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2021 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING J.B. DRAGOVICH, HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL, FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) 3A CHAMPIONSHIP IN WRESTLING IN THE 120 LB. WEIGHT DIVISION WHEREAS, athletic competitions are an important and integral part of the team curriculum at schools in Roanoke County; teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, teamwork and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2022, J. B. Dragovich, completed an undefeated senior season for Hidden Valley after placing second in 2020 and third in two oth er State tournament appearances and became Hidden Valley’s second State champion in school history; and WHEREAS, the 120-pounder came to Salem on a mission, but he was the picture of calm all day, scoring an 11-3 major decision over Rustburg’s Gage Bomar following a critical 11-3 major over New Kent’s Kyle Gibson in a morning semifinal; and WHEREAS, Mr. Dragovich finished his 2022 season with an undefeated overall record of 33-0 and; and WHEREAS, Mr. Dragovich was named one of two high school wrestler of the year by the Roanoke Valley Wrestling Association; and WHEREAS, Mr. Dragovich represented his school and community with great character, poise and sportsmanship. He is a true asset to Roanoke County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to J. B. DRAGOVICH, State 3A Region Wrestling Champion; and Page 2 of 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Mr. Dragovich, his coaches and the school in their future endeavors . Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution congratulating the Cave Spring High Scho ol Boys Basketball Team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Class 3A Championship SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney Board Member-Cave Spring APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: The time has been set aside to recognize and congratulate the Cave Spring High School Boys Basketball Team for winning the VHSL Class 3A Championship. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) CLASS 3 CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, athletic competitions are an important and integral part of the team curriculum at schools in Roanoke County; teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, teamwork and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2022, the Cave Spring High School Boys Basketball Team won the Class 3 State championship at the VCU Siegel Center in Richmond, Virginia with a 76-75 victory over Petersburg; and WHEREAS, the Knights senior guard, Owyn Dawyot scored 29 points, including the game-winning free throw with six seconds to play to lift Cave Spring (29-1) to its fifth overall State championship and the most wins in school history; and WHEREAS, the overall skill and versatility of its team as well as overall athletic ability was highly impressive; and WHEREAS, Owyn Dawyot and Stark Jones were named VHSCA State Co-Players of the Year as well as VHSL 1st Team All State; and WHEREAS, Bryce Cooper was named VHSCA 2nd Team All State and Dylan Saunders VHSCA 2nd Team All State; and W HEREAS, Knights Coach, Jacob Gruse was selected Coach of the Year; and WHEREAS, the team represented their school and community with great character, poise and sportsmanship. They are a true asset to Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Page 2 of 2 County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL TEAM: Seniors Skylor Griffiths, Owyn Dawyot, Bryce Cooper, Jesse Monsour, Tanner Kennedy, Will Childs and Tyler Roche; Juniors Graham Lilley, Bays Bryant, Stark Jones, Dyland Saunders, Joseph Ihlenburg and Coeburn Enyart and Sophmores Kameron Tinsley and Shawn Washington. The manager Thomas Barrow and Head Coach Jacob Gruse and Assistant Coaches Greg Mackey, Derrick Roth and John Sharp. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches and the school in their future endeavors. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution adopting the fiscal year 2022-2023 operating budget, the fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget, and the fiscal year 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program for the County of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution adopting the fiscal year 2022-2023 operating budget, the fiscal year 2022- 2023 capital budget and the fiscal year 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program for Roanoke County, Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools. BACKGROUND: Attached is a resolution approving the fiscal year 2022 -2023 operating budget for Roanoke County, Virginia. This resolution is detailed by fund and includes all transfers between funds. The fiscal year 2022-2023 Roanoke County Public School's operating budget is included in the overall County budget as presented in the attached resolution as part of Schedules 1 and 2. Also included in the resolution for approval and prepared in conjunction with t he fiscal year 2022-2023 operating budget are the fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget and fiscal years 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program for the County and the Schools. A summary of sources of funds and projects included as part of the County and Scho ols’ capital budget and Capital Improvement Program is attached as Schedule 3. Adoption of these documents does not represent an appropriation of funds. The commitment of funds will not occur until the second reading and approval of the fiscal Page 2 of 2 year 2022-2023 budget appropriation ordinance, which is later in the agenda. In regards to the County and Schools Capital Improvement Program, only the fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget will be appropriated as part of the budget appropriation ordinance. Adoption of the ten (10)-year plan does not represent an appropriation of funds for all years of the plan. Years two (2) through ten (10) of the Capital Improvement Plan are presented for informational and planning purposes only. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the budget is being requested to fulfill the County's legal requirements of adopting, and then having a first and second reading of the budget appropriation ordinance before July 1, 2022, and to allow adequate time for County and School staff to prepare and disburse employment contracts, institute pay changes and other administrative tasks necessary for final budget implementation. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the resolution adopting the County and the Schools fiscal year 2022 -2023 operating budget, fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget, and fiscal years 2023 -2032 Capital Improvement program followed by approval of the second reading of the five (5) fiscal year 2022-2023 budget appropriation ordinances provides County and Schools funding effective July 1, 2022. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution adopting the fiscal year 2022 -2023 operating budget, fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget and fiscal year 2023 -2032 Capital Improvement Program for Roanoke County, Virginia and Roanoke Coun ty Public Schools. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 OPERATING BUDGET, THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 CAPITAL BUDGET, AND FISCAL YEARS 2023-2032 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2503 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, provides that the governing body of the County shall prepare and approve an annual budget; and WHEREAS, said budget shall be prepared and approved for informative and fiscal planning purposes only; and WHEREAS, this budget contains a complete itemized and classified plan of all contemplated expenditures and all estimated revenues and borrowings for the ensuing fiscal year; and WHEREAS, a brief synopsis of said budget was published as required by the provisions of Section 15.2-2506 of the State Code, and the public hearings as required thereon were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That there is hereby approved the annual operating budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 for Roanoke County, Virginia, and Roanoke County Public Schools as shown on the attached Schedules 1 and 2. 2. That there is hereby approved the capital budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 and Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2023-2032 for Roanoke County, Virginia, and Roanoke County Public Schools as shown on the attached Schedule 3. Page 2 of 2 3. That the preparation and approval of these budgets is for informative and fiscal planning purposes only. 4. The fees which shall be charged by the County of Roanoke for the following described emergency medical services provided by the Roanoke County owned, operated, funded, housed or permitted emergency vehicles shall be as follows: Advance Life Support (ALS) 1 Emergency $525.00 Advance Life Support (ALS) 2 Emergency $760.00 Basic Life Support (BLS) Emergency $445.00 Mileage (loaded) $11.00/per mile No recipient of ambulance services who cannot afford to pay the ambulance transport fees will be required to do so. 5. The ambulance fees described abo ve in this resolution replace fees approved as part of resolution 052819-1 and shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2022. 6. That there is hereby approved a Fee Compendium which lists all fees and charges imposed by the County for providing specialized programs and services. The Fee Compendium provides details on the type of fee, authority to levy the fee, current fees, and proposed changes to the current fees. Amount $154,247,500 11,867,641 2,650,000 3,750,000 7,225,000 700,000 2,400,000 1,800,000 1,349,568 4,800,000 1,275,000 1,174,267 400,000 269,497 3,859,700 12,339,423 6,288,000 4,221,759 $220,617,355 $176,054 3,380,610 12,772,669 5,452,472 7,901,802 Grants and Other Funds 2,255,549 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - Schools Operations 401,874 Police E-Citation Special Revenue Fund 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee Fund 40,000 Police Special Programs 2,500 Criminal Justice Academy 440,236 $32,883,766 $253,501,121 Schedule #1 County of Roanoke & Roanoke County Public Schools Adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating and Capital Budget Revenues May 10, 2022 Subtotal, Other General Funds Total, General Fund - County Federal Other Subtotal, General Government Public Works Projects Recreation Fee Class Communications & Information Technology Children's Services Act (CSA) Permits, Fees & Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Use of Money and Property Charges for Services Commonwealth Hotel and Motel Room Tax Revenues - County General Fund - County General Government General Property Taxes Sales Tax Communications Sales and Use Tax Consumer Utility Tax Business License Tax Bank Franchise Tax Motor Vehicle License Fees Recordation Taxes Fleet Service Center Tax on Prepared Foods Other Local Taxes Page 1 of 2 Amount $14,438,331 4,125,345 22,570,146 15,194,312 $309,829,255 Amount $172,114,823 2,019,902 1,581,182 5,653,645 2,165,214 School Grant Fund 8,195,007 School Activity Fund 7,369,040 School Nutrition Fund 6,987,508 School Health Insurance Fund 19,943,933 1,690,566 383,500 132,820 $228,237,140 Total: All County and Schools Funds $538,066,395 Less: Transfers (120,410,193) Total Net of Transfers $417,656,202 Total, All Schools Funds School Risk Management Fund School OPEB Trust Fund Total, All County Funds Revenues - Schools School General (Operating) Fund School Fleet Replacement Fund School Technology Replacement Fund School Minor and Major Capital Projects Funds School Dental Insurance Fund Debt Service Fund - from County Internal Service Fund - County Capital Projects Fund - County Debt Service Fund - from Schools School Instructional Resources Fund Page 2 of 2 Amount $3,500,987 17,774,771 971,328 3,556,099 34,363,395 15,310,030 24,533,545 17,439,519 77,561,242 2,859,300 6,594,496 7,668,357 2,154,003 176,054 Transfer to Criminal Justice Academy 204,599 1,934,000 1,879,000 General Government Expenditure Contingency 43,605 Addition to Fund Balance 2,093,025 $220,617,355 $176,054 3,380,610 12,772,669 5,452,472 7,901,802 2,255,549 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - Schools Operations 401,874 Police E-Citation 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee 40,000 2,500 440,236 $32,883,766 $253,501,121 Human Services Non-Departmental Constitutional Officers Judicial Administration Management Services Public Safety Community Services Schedule #2 County of Roanoke & Roanoke County Public Schools Adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating and Capital Budget Expenditures May 10, 2022 Expenditures - County General Fund - County General Government General Administration Communications & Information Technology Transfers to School Operating Fund Transfers to (from) Capital Fund Transfers to Debt Service Fund - County Debt Transfers to Debt Service Fund - Schools Debt Transfers to Internal Services - Risk Management Transfer to Public Works Projects Transfer to Children's Services Act Fund - County Transfer to Children's Services Act Fund - Schools Subtotal, General Government Public Works Projects Fleet Service Center Subtotal, Other General Funds Total, General Fund - County Recreation Fee Class Children's Services Act (CSA) Police Special Programs Grants and Other Funds Criminal Justice Academy Page 1 of 2 Amount $18,563,676 22,570,146 15,194,312 $309,829,255 Amount $172,114,823 2,019,902 1,581,182 5,653,645 2,165,214 8,195,007 7,369,040 6,987,508 19,943,933 1,690,566 383,500 132,820 $228,237,140 Total: All County and Schools Funds $538,066,395 Less: Transfers (120,410,193) Total Net of Transfers $417,656,202 Total, All County Funds Debt Service Fund - County Capital Projects Fund - County Internal Service Fund - County Total, All Schools Funds School Activity Fund School Nutrition Fund School Health Insurance Fund Expenditures - Schools School Dental Insurance Fund School Risk Management Fund School OPEB Trust Fund School Grant Fund School General (Operating) Fund School Instructional Resources Fund School Fleet Replacement Fund School Technology Replacement Fund School Minor and Major Capital Projects Funds Page 2 of 2 Schedule #3 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - FY 2032 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Funding Sources Roanoke County - Unrestricted Cash FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Total General Government Transfer $1,400,000 $2,525,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $24,725,000 Capital Reserves 3,225,059 5,245,394 4,003,945 788,633 759,891 567,358 1,035,584 710,869 2,651,593 708,768 19,697,094 VPSA Refunding Bonds 175,478 157,625 124,750 124,125 125,931 122,831 82,944 82,631 82,631 82,631 1,161,577 Debt Fund - County 279,609 279,609 280,812 276,487 279,309 279,354 143,006 137,366 0 0 1,955,552 Subtotal, Unrestricted Cash $5,080,146 $8,207,628 $7,009,507 $3,789,245 $3,765,131 $3,569,543 $3,861,534 $3,530,866 $5,334,224 $3,391,399 $47,539,223 Roanoke County - Restricted Cash FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Total CommIT Fund Transfer $125,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $8,405,000 Subtotal, Restricted Cash $125,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $8,405,000 Non-County Funding Sources FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Total Transfer from Schools 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Contribution from City of Roanoke 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,000 Subtotal, Non-County Funding Sources $0 $500,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 Roanoke County - Bonds FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Total Lease / Revenue Bonds $13,000,000 $0 $0 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 $68,000,000 Subtotal, Lease / Revenue Bonds $13,000,000 $0 $0 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 $0 $0 $17,000,000 $68,000,000 Total, All County Funding Sources 18,205,146$ 9,627,628$ 8,679,507$ 25,709,245$ 4,685,131$ 4,489,543$ 21,781,534$ 4,450,866$ 6,254,224$ 21,311,399$ 125,194,223$ Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) - All Funding Sources FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Total General Fund Transfer (for CMP)794,857$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 9,794,857$ Major Capital Reserves 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 6,000,000 Debt Fund - Schools 605,164 640,703 676,244 700,833 725,424 752,750 644,694 0 0 0 4,745,812 Grant Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VPSA Refunding Credits 165,193 116,750 116,250 117,931 114,831 74,943 74,631 3,987 4,012 0 788,528 VPSA Bond Issue 0 17,000,000 17,000,000 0 17,000,000 17,000,000 0 17,000,000 17,000,000 0 102,000,000 Total, RCPS Funding Sources $2,165,214 $19,357,453 $19,392,494 $2,418,764 $19,440,255 $19,427,693 $2,319,325 $18,603,987 $18,604,012 $1,600,000 $123,329,197 Total, FY 22-31 County & RCPS Funding Sources $20,370,360 $28,985,081 $28,072,001 $28,128,009 $24,125,386 $23,917,236 $24,100,859 $23,054,853 $24,858,236 $22,911,399 $248,523,420 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - FY 2032 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects Functional Team/Department/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 23-32 Total Public Safety Sheriff Sheriff's Office Capital Maintenance Program $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $150,000 $150,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,000 $1,390,000 Sheriff Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 1,390,000 Police Replacement of Firearms $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Police Total 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Communications & IT Digital Microwave Ring Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Safety Communications Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emergency Medical Dispatch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roanoke Valley Radio System Hardware Upgrade 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 Communications & IT Total 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 Fire & Rescue Fire and Rescue Ballistic Body Armor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diesel Exhaust Removal System 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire and Rescue Messaging System 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 New Bonsack/460 Fire Station 6,825,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,825,000 Fire and Rescue Asessment 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Hollins Fire Station Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 12,000,000 0 0 0 12,100,000 Fire & Rescue Total 7,025,000 150,000 0 0 0 100,000 12,000,000 0 0 0 19,275,000 Courthouse and Court Services Courthouse HVAC Replacement 0 0 2,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,350,000 Courthouse and Court Services Total 0 0 2,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,350,000 Public Safety Total $7,350,000 $275,000 $3,975,000 $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 $12,150,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,000 $24,715,000 Community Services Planning Glade Creek Greenway at Vinyard Park West $130,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,275 New Zoning Ordinance 50,000 250,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program 200,000 350,000 425,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 4,475,000 Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2023-2032 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - FY 2032 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects Functional Team/Department/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 23-32 Total Community Services(Continued) Planning (Continued) 419 Town Center Development Standards $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Route 460/ Challenger Avenue Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fallowater Lane Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buck Mountain / Starkey Rd Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dry Hollow Rd Safety Improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Huffman Lane Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plantation Rd Phase II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Main Street Pedestrian Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Williamson Rd Pedestrian Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Planning Total 380,275 600,000 525,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 5,005,275 Stormwater Management NPDES - MS4 BMP Construction 150,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 1,350,000 Storm Drainage Maintenance of Effort Program 240,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 260,000 265,000 270,000 275,000 280,000 285,000 2,625,000 Stormwater Management Total 390,000 345,000 450,000 355,000 360,000 365,000 470,000 375,000 380,000 485,000 3,975,000 Economic Development Roanoke County Broadband Initiative 384,939 387,149 383,664 383,664 384,983 0 0 0 0 0 1,924,399 Wood Haven Property Acquisition & Improvements 369,932 370,479 370,843 370,581 370,148 369,543 370,534 370,866 369,224 371,399 3,703,549 Economic Development Total 754,871 757,628 754,507 754,245 755,131 369,543 370,534 370,866 369,224 371,399 5,627,948 Communications & IT Rural Broadband Initiative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Communications & IT Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Services Total $1,525,146 $1,702,628 $1,729,507 $1,609,245 $1,615,131 $1,234,543 $1,340,534 $1,245,866 $1,249,224 $1,356,399 $14,608,223 Human Services Library Hollins Library Replacement $200,000 $500,000 $0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,700,000 Public Computer Replacement Plan 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 830,000 Mount Pleasant Library Repairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Library Total 275,000 575,000 100,000 12,100,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 13,530,000 All Projects (Continued) Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2023-2032 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - FY 2032 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects Functional Team/Department/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 23-32 Total Human Services (Continued) Parks and Recreation Explore Park 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 Green Ridge CMP 55,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,130,000 Green Ridge Dehumidification 0 0 250,000 250,000 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 740,000 PRT CMP 725,000 725,000 725,000 725,000 725,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 7,375,000 Sports Field Lighting Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 150,000 0 900,000 East Roanoke River Greenway Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Roanoke River Greenway Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks and Recreation Total 2,180,000 800,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 1,065,000 1,125,000 1,125,000 1,150,000 1,050,000 900,000 11,545,000 Elections Voting Machine Replacement 0 425,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425,000 Elections Total 0 425,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425,000 Human Services Total $2,455,000 $1,800,000 $1,175,000 $13,175,000 $1,145,000 $1,205,000 $1,205,000 $1,230,000 $1,130,000 $980,000 $25,500,000 Internal Services Communications & IT Computer Replacement Program $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $2,700,000 County-Wide Phone Replacement Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 266,000 0 0 0 266,000 Enterprise Storage and Data Backup 0 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,900,000 0 3,200,000 IT Infrastructure Replacement Plan 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 6,500,000 CommIT Total 920,000 2,220,000 920,000 920,000 920,000 920,000 1,186,000 920,000 2,820,000 920,000 12,666,000 Finance/Human Resources Human Resources and Payroll Modules 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 Finance/Human Resources Total 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 All Projects (Continued) Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2023-2032 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2023 - FY 2032 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary of County and Schools Projects Functional Team/Department/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 23-32 Total Internal Services (Continued) General Services Bent Mountain Community Center Upgrade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Services CMP 880,000 880,000 880,000 880,000 880,000 880,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 8,880,000 Public Service Center Replacement 4,775,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,775,000 Cold Storage Building Renovations 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 RCAC Building Evaluation 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 RCAC HVAC Replacement 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 Facilities Assessment 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Future Capital Project 0 0 0 9,000,000 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 17,000,000 31,000,000 General Services Total 5,955,000 2,630,000 880,000 9,880,000 880,000 880,000 5,900,000 900,000 900,000 17,900,000 46,705,000 Internal Services Total $6,875,000 $5,850,000 $1,800,000 $10,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $7,086,000 $1,820,000 $3,720,000 $18,820,000 $60,371,000 Subtotal, Roanoke County Projects $18,205,146 $9,627,628 $8,679,507 $25,709,245 $4,685,131 $4,489,543 $21,781,534 $4,450,866 $6,254,224 $21,311,399 $125,194,223 Functional Team/Department/Project FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 23-32 Total Roanoke County Public Schools Schools Capital Maintenance Program $419,857 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $9,419,857 HR Payroll and Software System 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $500,000 WE Cundiff Elementary 685,178 8,928,727 9,196,247 709,381 7,007,894 0 0 0 0 0 $26,527,427 Glen Cove Elementary 685,179 8,928,726 9,196,247 709,383 3,499,113 0 0 0 0 0 $23,018,648 Burton Center for the Arts & Technology 0 0 0 0 7,933,248 18,427,693 1,319,325 17,603,987 17,604,012 600,000 $63,488,265 Turf Field Renovations 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $150,000 Music Uniforms 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $25,000 Grant Contingency 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $200,000 Schools Total 2,165,214 19,357,453 19,392,494 2,418,764 19,440,255 19,427,693 2,319,325 18,603,987 18,604,012 1,600,000 123,329,197 Total, Roanoke County Public Schools Projects $2,165,214 $19,357,453 $19,392,494 $2,418,764 $19,440,255 $19,427,693 $2,319,325 $18,603,987 $18,604,012 $1,600,000 $123,329,197 Total, FY 22-31 County & Schools Projects $20,370,360 $28,985,081 $28,072,001 $28,128,009 $24,125,386 $23,917,236 $24,100,859 $23,054,853 $24,858,236 $22,911,399 $248,523,420 All Projects (Continued) All Projects (Continued) Note: Projects with $0 in FY 2023-2032 are active projects that have been fully funded in prior fiscal years. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page Number Page Number FY 2022-2023 Roanoke County Fee Changes 1 Fire and Rescue Fees 24 Clerk of Circuit Court Fees 3 Ambulance Fees 24 Booking Fee 3 Fire Marshal Permits and Fees 24 Courthouse Maintenance Fees 3 General Services - Solid Waste Fees 28 Courthouse Security Fees 4 Bear Container Retrofits Fee 28 Other Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court Fees 4 Non-Resident and Premium Solid Waste Collection Fees 28 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees 5 Library Fees 29 Amusement Machine Fee 5 Library Facility and Rental Fees 29 Bondsman License Fee 5 Library Material Fines and Services Fees 32 Business License Fee 5 Passport Fees 34 Carnivals, Circuses and Speedways 6 Planning Fees 35 Fortune-teller, astrologists, etc.6 Planning & Zoning Fees 35 Going out of business sale permit 6 Special Use Permit Fee 36 Massage Parlor License 6 Weed and Trash Abatement Penalty 37 Non-Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses 7 Zoning Verification Fees 38 Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses 7 Police Fees 39 Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums 8 Adult Business Permit Fee 39 Shows and Sales License 8 Animal Boarding Services Fees 39 Solicitor Permit 8 Concealed Handgun Permit 40 Wine, Beer, and Mixed Beverage Licenses 9 Criminal Justice Academy Fees 40 Development Services Fees 12 Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems License Fee 41 Building and Trade Permit Fees 12 False Alarm Fees 41 Certificate of Occupancy Fees 15 Fingerprinting Fee 42 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fees 16 Mopeds Traffic Violations 42 Miscellaneous Development Fees 16 Parade Fees 43 Subdivision Review Fees 17 Parking Tickets 43 Stormwater Management Permit Fees 18 Police E-Citation Fee 45 Finance & Management Services Fees 23 Sale of Records of Arrests, Offenses and Traffic Accident Reports 46 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 23 Table of Contents County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium TC-1 Table of Contents Page Number Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees 47 Recreation Fees, Membership Fees, and Rentals 47 Public Information Fees 53 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Charges 53 Public Transportation (CORTRAN) Fees 55 CORTRAN Fee per Trip 55 Real Estate Valuation Fees 56 Land Use Fees 56 Sheriff and Jail Fees 58 Board of Prisoners - Salem 58 Canteen Fees 58 Daily Jail Fees 58 Fingerprint Cards 58 Home Electronic Monitoring 59 Medical Costs 59 Process Service 59 Sobrieter 60 Weekender Jail Fees 60 Social Services Fees 61 Custody Investigations/Home Studies 61 Guardianship Fee 61 Home Study for Parental Placement Adoptions 61 Treasurer Fees 62 Animal Control - Cat Tags 62 Animal Control - Dog Tags 62 Animal Control - Dangerous Dogs 63 Collection Fee 63 Debt Set-Off Fee 64 Judicial Tax Sale Fees 64 Returned Check Fee 65 Vehicle License Fee 65 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium TC-2 Fee Description FY 2022 FY 2023 Amusement Devices Kiddie rides, circular rides or flat rides, etc. $15.00 for Kiddie rides, $25 for Circular rides or flat rides, $45 for all others devices $35.00 for Kiddie rides, $45 for Circular rides or flat rides, $50 for all others devices Cross connection Any physical connection of arrangement between two otherwise separate piping system $30 $40 Technology Fee Fund 3% fee per any permit issuing fees 3% Charge 5% Charge Fee Description FY 2022 FY 2023 Ambulance Service Fee Basic Life Support Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $400 $445 FY 2022-2023 Roanoke County Fee Changes Development Services Fees Ambulance Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 092804-7 and 051022-TBD Technology Fee Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8 and 051022-TBD County of Roanoke, Virginia Resolution 052819-1 051022-TBD County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 1 of 66 FY 2022-2023 Roanoke County Fee Changes Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 1 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries with the provision of an Advanced Life Support assessment or at least on Advanced Life Support intervention until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $465 $525 Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 2 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries with the provision of more intervention than that of Advanced Life Support 1 until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $700 $760 Fee Description FY 2022 FY 2023 Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for "Adult Books" Overdue fines for adult or children's books or materials. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $0.20 per day Fee Eliminated Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for "In Demand" Books Overdue fines to new or high circulation books. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $1 per day Fee Eliminated Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for Video Materials Overdue fines for video materials including DVDs. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $1 per day Fee Eliminated Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 2-5. Ordinance 052510-12 and 051022-TBD Library Material Fines and Services Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 2 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Booking Fee April 8, 2003 Fee as part of the costs in each criminal or traffic case in which a period of incarceration or confinement in the county jail shall be imposed or served as any part of the sentence for conviction of any statute or ordinance. $25 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Courthouse Maintenance Fees February 9, 2010 Fee on the costs in each civil, criminal and traffic case in the district and circuit courts serving Roanoke County for the construction, renovation and maintenance of the courthouse or jail and court-related facilities and to defray increases in the cost of heating, cooling electricity, and ordinary maintenance. $2 Booking Fee Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-8 Ordinance 040803-10 Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Code of Virginia § 17.1-281 Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-6 Ordinance 020910-4 Courthouse Maintenance Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 3 of 66 Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Courthouse Security Fees July 1, 2007 Fee on each criminal or traffic case in which an individual is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance.$10 Roanoke County Code Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-9 Ordinance 062607-15 Other Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court Fees Information on fees paid to the Roanoke County Clerk of Circuit Court as set by the Commonwealth of Virginia can be found by following the link below: http://webdev.courts.state.va.us/cgi-bin/DJIT/ef_djs_ccfees_calc.cgi Courthouse Security Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 4 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Amusement Machines June 25, 1996 Fee for coin-operated amusement machines or devices. $25 for 3 machines or fewer, $25 for each additional machine up to a maximum of $200 for 10 machines or more. $25 to $200 based on number of machines Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Bondsman License January 1, 1989 or bonds for others, whether as principal or surety.$500 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Business License Fee Gross Receipts less than $135,000 July 1, 2019 occupations, and callings, firms, corporations, or persons with gross receipts less than $135,000. $50 Amusement Machine Fee Bondsman License Fee Business License Fee Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Code of Virginia § 58.1-3703 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article I, Section 10-3, Ordinance 052819-9 Code of Virginia § 58.1-3724 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-40 Code of Virginia § 58.1-3720 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-53 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 5 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Carnivals, Circuses, and Speedways January 1, 1989 License fee per performance for the operation of a carnival, circus, or speedway $250 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Fortune-tellers, astrologists, etc. January 1, 1989 Annual license for every person engaged in business as a fortune-teller, clairvoyant, phrenologist, spirit medium, astrologist, hypnotist, palmist, or handwriting analyst. $1,000 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Going out of business sale permit October 1, 1992 Fee of $65 for a permit to operate a sale to liquidate the goods or assets of business that is closing.$65 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Massage Parlor License January 1, 1989 Annual license to operate a massage parlor.$5,000 Code of Virginia § 58.1-3728 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-57 Carnivals, Circuses, and Speedways Fortune-tellers, astrologists, etc. Going out of business sale permit Massage Parlor License Code of Virginia § 58.1-3706 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-50 Code of Virginia § 18.2-223 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-58, Ordinance 92292-8e. Code of Virginia § 58.1-3726 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-41 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 6 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Peddler of Non Perishable Goods November 10, 2015 Fee for any person who carries from place to place any goods, wares, or general merchandise of a non-perishable nature. Fee is $250 per month, per vehicle, not to exceed $500 per year. $250 per month, per vehicle, not to exceed $500 per year Itinerant Merchant of Non Perishable Goods November 10, 2016 Fee for any person who transacts a business in a location for a period of less than one year to sell goods of a non-perishable nature.$500 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Peddler of Perishable Goods November 10, 2015 Fee for any person who carries from place to place any goods, wares, or merchandise and offer to sell general merchandise of a perishable nature and peddlers of ice, wood, or coal. $50 Itinerant Merchant of Perishable Goods November 10, 2016 Fee for any person who transacts a business in a location for a period of less than one year to sell goods of a perishable nature and merchants of ice, wood, or coal. $50 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-45 Non-Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses Perishable Good Peddler and Itinerant Merchant Licenses Code of Virginia § 58.1-3717 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-45 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 7 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums January 1, 1989 Annual license on every permanent coliseum, arena, and auditorium within the county having a maximum seating capacity of more than 10,000 persons and open to the general public. $1,000 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Shows and Sales License January 1, 1989 License per event of up to a three day period to conduct a show or sale in the county.$30 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Solicitor Permit November 13, 1984 merchandise, foodstuffs or services of any kind, character or description; prospective customers for purchase of insurance; obtain subscriptions to books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers, or other publications. $30 Code of Virginia § 58.1-3729 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-55 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 19 Article I, Sections 19-1 to 19-8 Ordinance 84-194 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-52 Permanent coliseums, arenas, or auditoriums Shows and Sales License Solicitor Permit County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 8 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Wholesale Distributor - Beer January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer wholesale $75 Wholesale Distributor - Wine January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine wholesale $50 Wholesale Distributor - Beer and Wine January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine wholesale $125 On premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer on premises.$25 Off premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer off premises.$25 On premises Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine on premises.$25 Off premises Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine off premises.$25 On premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine on premises.$37.50 Off premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine off premises.$37.50 On and Off premises Beer Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer on and off premises.$50 On and Off premises Beer and Wine Sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer and wine on and off premises.$75 Mixed Beverages and Beer On premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer on premises with seating capacity between 50 and 100 persons.$225 Code of Virginia § 4.1 206.1-240 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 10 Article III, Section 10-49 Wine, Beer, and Mixed Beverage Licenses County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 9 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on premises with seating capacity between 50 and 100 persons.$237.50 Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On & Off premises Sales License with seating between 50 and 100 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on and off premises with seating capacity between 50 and 100 persons.$275 Mixed Beverages and Beer On premises Sales License with seating between 101 and 150 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer on premises with seating capacity between 101 and 150 persons.$387.50 Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating between 101 and 150 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on & off premises with seating capacity between 101 and 150 persons.$425.50 Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On premises Sales License with seating over 151 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on premises with seating capacity over 151 persons $537.50 Mixed Beverages and Beer & Wine On and Off premises Sales License with seating over 151 January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell mixed beverages and beer & wine on and off premises with seating capacity over 151 persons $575 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 10 of 66 Commissioner of the Revenue Fees Private Club Beer on premises sales January 1, 1989 Annual license for private clubs to sell beer on premises.$387.50 on and off premises sales January 1, 1989 Annual license for private clubs to sell beer & wine on and off premises.$400 Wine off premises sales and beer on premises sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell wine off premises and beer on premises.$50 sales and beer off premises sales January 1, 1989 Annual license to sell beer & wine on premises and beer off premises.$62.50 Mixed Beverages sales with seating between 101- premises, and beer off premises. January 1, 1989 Annual license for mixed beverage sales with seating capacity between 101 and 150 persons and to sell beer & wine on premises and to sell beer off premises. $412.50 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 11 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $0 and $5,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of between $0 and $5,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $30 Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $5,000 and $20,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of between $5,000 and $20,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $30 + $6 per thousand Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $20,000 and $100,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of between $20,000 and $100,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $120 + $5 per thousand Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $100,000 and $500,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of between $100,000 and $500,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $520 + $2 per thousand Building Permit for structure with estimated value of between $500,000 and $1,000,000. September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of between $500,000 and $1,000,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $1,320 + $1 per thousand Development Services Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 092804-7 and 051022-TBD Building and Trade Permit Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 12 of 66 Development Services Fees Building Permit for structure with estimated value of over $1,000,000 September 28, 2004 Any building permit application for new structure with estimated value of over $1,000,000. Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction as adjusted annually by the county real estate valuation. $1,820 +$0.50 per thousand Trade permit fees with estimated value of $0 to $1,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of $0 to $1,000.$30 Trade permit fees with estimated value of $1,000.01 to $2,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of $1,000.01 to $2,000.$40 Trade permit fees with estimated value of $2,000.01 to $3,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of $2,000.01 to $3,000.$50 Trade permit fees with estimated value of $3,000.01 to $4,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of $3,000.01 to $4,000.$60 Trade permit fees with estimated value of $4,000.01 to $5,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of $4,000.01 to $5,000.$75 Trade permit fees with estimated value of over $5,000 September 28, 2004 Any trade permit for Heating, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Structure, etc. with an estimated value of over $5,000 $75 + $4 per each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 13 of 66 Development Services Fees Amusement Devices September 28, 2004 July 1, 2022 Kiddie rides, circular rides or flat rides, etc. $15 $35 for Kiddie rides, $25 $45 for Circular rides or flat rides, $45 $50 for all other devices Cross connection September 28 2004 July 1, 2022 Any physical connection of arrangement between two otherwise separate piping system $30 $40 Miscellaneous September 28, 2004 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, reinspection, etc.$50 Elevator periodic inspection September 28, 2004 Process a submittal of Elevator Inspection results $35 Cancellation of project or permit September 28, 2004 An administrative fee of 25% of the actual calculated permit fee will be withheld from any permit or application that is canceled, withdrawn or revoked before issuance of the permit or completion of the project. Varies Pass-thru Fee to State of Virginia July 1, 2018 Pass-thru Fee to State of Virginia (2% Charge on all Building, Plumbing, Electrical, or Mechanical Permits)2% Charge County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 14 of 66 Development Services Fees Legislative Authorization Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary Commercial September 28, 2004 Permit request including but not limited to reinspection, temporary certificate of occupancies (commercial), etc.$25 Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary Residential September 28, 2004 Permit request including reinspection temporary certificate of occupancies (residential), etc.$10 Certificate of Occupancy - Existing Building (Commercial) September 28, 2004 Permit request including inspection and reissuing of certificate of occupancies, etc.$35 Legislative Authorization Certificate of Occupancy - Commercial July 1, 2018 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, temporary certificate of occupancies, etc.$50 Certificate of Occupancy - Residential July 1, 2018 Permit request including but not limited to reinsertion, temporary certificate of occupancies, etc.$25 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 052218-8 Certificate of Occupancy Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 7-71 to 7-79 Roanoke County Ordinance 092804-7 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 15 of 66 Development Services Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July 1, 2018 Any land disturbing activities of less than 5,000 SQ FT $25 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July 1, 2018 Any land disturbing activities between 5,000 SQ FT and 9,999 SQ FT $50 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fee July 1, 2018 Any land disturbing activities of 10,000 SQ FT or more $350 + $75/acre or portion thereof Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Permit Renewal (Annual)July 1, 2018 Second and subsequent renewals of annual permits (for erosion and sediment control, site plan and/or large subdivision development); there will be no fee for the first twelve (12) month renewal of a permit). $750 Technology Fee Fund July 1, 2018 2022 3% 5% fee per any permit issuing fees.3% 5% Charge Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Review/Permit Fees Miscellaneous Development Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8 and 051022-TBD Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 16 of 66 Development Services Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Small Subdivision Review (Less than 4 lots or parcels)June 12, 1990 Residential land subdivision of creating 4 or less parcels $25 Resubmittal of Plans 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th June 12, 1990 Charges to review the plans following the second review due to changes presented by the owner or their engineer of record. $350 per submittal Vacation of Plat & Easements June 12, 1990 Vacating any old plat or removing any easements/right of way that are no longer needed to cloud property deed.$188 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Site Plan Review July 1, 2018 Any commercial construction plans or subdivision of any kind.$755 + $75/acre Large Subdivision Review (5 or more lots or parcels)July 1, 2018 Residential land subdivision of creating 5 or more parcels.$350 + $75/lot or parcel Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 2, Section 7-18; Chapter 7, Article 5 Ordinance 61290-6. Subdivision Review Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 17 of 66 Development Services Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Single Family Residential 0 to 5 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. For single-family detached residential structure within or outside common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage between 0 and 5 acres $209 Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small Construction less than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Small construction activity/land clearing (areas within common plans of development or sale with land-disturbance acreage less than 1 acre) $290 ($209 to Roanoke County, $81 to State) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small Construction between 1 and 5 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Small construction activity/land clearing (areas within common plans of development or sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 acre and less than 5 acres) $2,700 ($1,944 to Roanoke County, $756 to State) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP)July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $3,400 ($2,448 to Roanoke County, $952 to State) Code of Virginia, Section 62.1-44.15:28 Virginia Water Control Board regulations 9VAC25-870-820, 9VAC25-870-825, 9VAC25-870-830 Ordinance 042214-12 Stormwater Management Ordinance Resolution 051314-2 Adopting Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Schedule of Fees Stormwater Management Permit Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 18 of 66 Development Services Fees Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $4,500 ($3,240 to Roanoke County, $1,260 to State) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 50 and 100 acres July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $6,100 ($4,392 to Roanoke County, $1,708 to State) Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP)July 1, 2014 Statewide permit fee established by the State Board of Water Control. Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) $9,600 ($6,912 to Roanoke County, $2,688 to State) Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small Construction less than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre)$20 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 19 of 66 Development Services Fees Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small Construction between 1 and 5 acres July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 and less than 5 acres) $200 Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 5 and 10 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $250 Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $300 Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 50 and 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $450 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 20 of 66 Development Services Fees Modification or Transfer of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction greater than 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) $700 Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small construction less than 1 acre July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre) except for single family detached residential structures. $50 Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Small construction between 1 and 5 acres July 1, 2014 Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 and less than 5 acres) $400 Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large construction between 5 and 10 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $500 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 21 of 66 Development Services Fees Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large Construction between 10 and 50 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $650 Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large construction between 50 and 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $900 Annual Maintenance Fee of Virginia Stormwater Management General Coverage Permit (VSMP) - Large construction greater than 100 acres July 1, 2014 Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites, or areas within common plans of development or sale, with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) $1,400 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 22 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Payment In Lieu of Taxes April 12, 2004 A service fee paid by entities that qualify for tax-exempt status as defined by costs associated with providing services to tax-exempt entities. Each payment in lieu of tax for each entity must be approved by the Board of Supervisors. 20% of Assessed Real Estate Taxes Finance & Management Services Fees Code of Virginia § 58.1-3400 and 58.1-3401 Payment In Lieu of Taxes County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 23 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Ambulance Service Fee Basic Life Support July 1, 2019 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $400 $445 Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 1 July 1, 2019 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries with the provision of an Advanced Life Support assessment or at least on Advanced Life Support intervention until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $465 $525 Ambulance Service Fee Advanced Life Support 2 July 1, 2019 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle for providing a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. $700 $760 Ambulance Service Fee Rescue Vehicle Mileage July 1, 2019 2022 Fee for ground transportation by ambulance vehicle per mile.$11 per mile Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Amusement Building Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the operation of an amusement building per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Fire and Rescue Fees Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 9, Article II, Section 9-10, Article III, Section 9-19 Ordinance 52488 County of Roanoke, Virginia Resolution 052819-1 051022-TBD Fire Marshall Permits and Fees Ambulance Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 24 of 66 Fire and Rescue Fees Carnival and Fair Permit May 24, 1988 issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Combustible Dust- Producing Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses which produce combustible dust during facility of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Compressed Gas Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the use of compressed gas per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Covered Mall Building Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for enclosed malls and shopping centers for alarm and fire suppression systems. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Cutting, Welding, and Hot Work Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for welding, cutting, and hot work per event or job. The fire marshal Prevention Code. $25 Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for exhibit or trade show per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Explosives Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for any blasting work per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Flammable and Combustible Liquids May 24, 1988 Permit for the storage of and/or removal of a tank per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 25 of 66 Fire and Rescue Fees Floor Finishing Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for using chemicals to finish floors per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Fruit and Crop Ripening Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses where ethylene gas is introduced into a room to promote the ripening of fruits, vegetables, and other crops. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Thermal Insecticidal May 24, 1988 Permit for professional fumigation, thermal, or fogging pesticide use per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Hazardous Materials Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for businesses storing or using hazardous materials. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings May 24, 1988 Permit for use of liquid or gas fuel vehicles or equipment in buildings during assembly per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Open Burning Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for burning materials in open area. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $0 Open Flames and Candles Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for flames or candles in open area. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $0 Private Fire Hydrant Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for a private fire hydrant. Permit is per hydrant. The fire marshal Prevention Code. $25 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 26 of 66 Fire and Rescue Fees Pyrotechnic Special Effects Material Permit May 24, 1988 marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Storage of Scrap Tires and Tire By-Products Permit May 24, 1988 Annual permit for the storage of scrap tires and tire by-products. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Temporary Membrane, Structure, Tent, and Canopy Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for the use of a temporary membrane, structure, tent, or canopy per event. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Waste Handling Permit May 24, 1988 Prevention Code. $25 Place of Assembly Occupancy Permit May 24, 1988 Permit for any business where people may assemble including restaurants, theaters, etc… The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 Storage of Explosives May 24, 1988 Annual permit per magazine to store explosives. The fire marshal shall issue all permits pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. $25 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 27 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Bear Container Retrofits January 1, 2014 Fee to retrofit existing automated collection containers with device to make them bear resistant.$30 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Non-County Resident Waste Collection Fee January 27, 2004 Monthly waste collection fee for Non-County Residents $20 Non-County Resident Container Rental Fee January 27, 2004 Monthly container rental fee for Non-County Residents $1 Premium Waste Collection Fee January 27, 2004 Application fee for optional backyard services may be available to residential customers for household waste.$20 Premium Waste Collection Fee for first 100 feet from Curb January 27, 2004 Optional backyard collection service for first 100 feet from Curb $15 Collection Fee for each additional 100 feet from January 27, 2004 Optional backyard collection service for each additional 100 feet or fraction thereof from Curb $10 Container Replacement Fee January 27, 2004 Chapter 20, Article II, Section 20-24, b: The replacement fee for a container $65 Fee set administratively by the Director of General Services General Services - Solid Waste Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 20, Article II, Section 20-24. Ordinance 012704-3 Bear Container Retrofits Fee Non-Resident and Premium Solid Waste Collection Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 28 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Amount South County Library Auditorium and Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental July 1, 2019 Fee to rent the Auditorium with Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 at South County Library. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$125 South County Library Auditorium July 1, 2019 Fee to rent the Auditorium at South County Library. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$75 per hour South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 or 2 Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 or 2 at South County Library by community groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$10 per hour South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 or 2 Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 or 2 at South County Library by commercial groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$25 per hour South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 South County Library by community groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$20 per hour South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 South County Library by commercial groups. After hours rate at South County Library is doubled.$40 per hour South County Library Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms 1 and 2 at South County Library for parties. Must rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 hour cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. $25 per hour Library Fees Library Facility and Rental Fees Resolution 121311-1 allows the Library Director to establish fees for the use of Library meeting rooms based upon recommendations from the Library Board and Approval by the County Administrator. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 29 of 66 Library Fees South County Library Business Office 1/2 Day Rental July 1, 2019 Rental fee for the Business office at South County Library for 1/2 day (up to 4 hours).$50 South County Library Business Office Full Day Rental July 1, 2019 Rental fee for the Business office at South County Library for full day (over 4 hours).$100 Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library by community groups. $10 per hour Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library by commercial groups. $40 per hour Glenvar Library Meeting Room Rental (Party Rentals) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Glenvar Library for parties. Must rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 hour cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. $25 per hour Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Community)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library by community groups.$10 per hour Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Commercial)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library by commercial groups.$40 per hour Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee (Party Rentals)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Hollins Library for parties. Must rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 hour cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. $25 per hour Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Conference Room (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by community groups.$10 per hour County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 30 of 66 Library Fees Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Conference Room (Commercial) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by commercial groups.$25 per hour Hollins Library Meeting Room Fee - Projector Rental July 1, 2019 Hourly rate to rent a projector for use in a meeting room at Hollins Library $5 per hour Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Community)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library by community groups.$10 per hour Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Commercial)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library by commercial groups.$40 per hour Vinton Library Meeting Room Fee (Party Rentals)July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of meeting rooms at Vinton Library for parties. Must rent for a minimum of 3 hours that includes 1 hour setup and 1 hour cleanup. Non refundable $50 deposit. $25 per hour Vinton Library Conference Room Fee (Community) July 1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Vinton Library by community groups.$10 per hour Vinton Library Conference Room Fee (Commercial) July1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of conference room at Hollins Library by commercial groups.$25 per hour Computer Lab Room Fee All Locations July1, 2019 Hourly rate for rent of computer lab at all locations.$125 per hour County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 31 of 66 Library Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Amount Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for "Adult Books" July 1, 2010 2022 Overdue fines for adult or children's books or materials. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $0.20 per day Fee Eliminated Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for "In Demand" Books July 1, 2010 2022 Overdue fines to new or high circulation books. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $1 per day Fee Eliminated Library Material Fee - Overdue Fines for Video Materials July 1, 2010 2022 Overdue fines for video materials including DVDs. $5.00 maximum fine per item. $1.00 maximum fine per item for children's book or material. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $1 per day Fee Eliminated Library Material Fee - Replacement of Library Card July 1, 2010 $1 charge for a replacement library card. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $1 Library Material Fee - Lost Materials July 1, 2010 Cost varies per item. A $5 service fee is charged in addition to the replacement cost of the item. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. $5 service charge + item replacement cost Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 2-5. Ordinance 052510-12 and 051022-TBD Library Material Fines and Services Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 32 of 66 Library Fees Library Material Fee - Damaged Materials July 1, 2010 Repair cost up to replacement cost per item. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. Repair cost up to replacement cost per item Library Service Fee - Copies April 3, 2017 Fee, per page, for photocopy services.$0.15 per page Library Service Fee - Printing or Copying (Black and White) July 1, 2010 Fee, per page, for printing or copying black and white pages on public library printers.$0.10 per page Library Service Fee - Printing or Copying (Color) July 1, 2010 Fee, per page, for printing or copying color pages on public library printers.$0.25 per page Library Service Fee - Interlibrary Loan July 1, 2010 Lender library fee, if applicable, plus postage cost per item. A person shall be denied library privileges if $10.00 in fines, fees, or charges have accrued or if 25 or more items are overdue. Lender fee, if any, plus postage cost Library Service Fee - Local Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for local service. $2 first page, $1 additional page, $0.50 receiving page County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 33 of 66 Library Fees Library Service Fee - Long Distance Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for long distance service. $3 first page, $1 additional page, $0.50 receiving page Library Service Fee - International Fax Service July 1, 2010 Cost per page for fax machine use for international service. $6 first page, $1.50 additional page, $0.50 receiving page Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Amount Passport Execution Fee April 2, 2018 Cost per passport application processed at South County Library.$35 Passport Fees 22 U.S. Code 214 - Fees for Execution and Issuance of Passports County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 34 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Subdivision Waiver or Variance June 12, 1990 Any request to review variances or wave certain requirement in residential or commercial subdivision due to hardship $238 Zoning Variance June 12, 1990 Application to Board of Zoning Appeals to get relief from zoning requirement due to hardship $190 Administrative Appeal June 12, 1990 Application to Board of Zoning Appeals to appeal the Zoning Administrator's decision on a zoning matter $275 Land Use Plan Amendment June 12, 1990 Application to amend the County's Future Land Use Plan Map $710 Rezoning: Agricultural/Single Family Residence June 12, 1990 (A-1, RE, R-1) $415 + $20/acre or portion thereof Rezoning: Multi-Family June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for multi-family housing (R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, R- MH, R-6) $860 + $25/acre or portion thereof Rezoning: Industrial June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for industrial uses (B-1, B-2, B-3) $840 + $30/acre or portion thereof Planning Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 7, Article 2, Section 7-18; Chapter 7, Article 5 Ordinance 61290-6. Planning & Zoning Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 35 of 66 Planning Fees Rezoning: Commercial June 12, 1990 Application to rezone property for commercial uses $945 + $32/acre or portion thereof Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Special Use Permit July 1, 2018 Application for a use that is listed as a special use within a particular zoning district $150 Special Use/Landfill June 12, 1990 Application for a special use permit for a land fill $1,875 Special Use Permit Fee Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinances 061290-6 and 052218-8. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 36 of 66 Planning Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fine Amount Weed Abatement Penalty - First Violation November 12, 2013 First penalty for weeds or grass higher than twelve inches in height within 250 feet of property developed for residential use. $50 and cost to cut grass and weeds if applicable Weed Abatement Penalty - Subsequent Violations November 12, 2013 Subsequent penalty within a twelve month period for weeds or grass higher than twelve inches in height within 250 feet of property developed for residential use. to cut grass and weeds if applicable Trash Abatement Penalty - First Violation November 12, 2013 First penalty for the accumulation of trash on any parcel or property. $50 and cost to remove trash Trash Abatement Penalty - Subsequent Violations November 12, 2013 Subsequent penalty within a twelve month period for accumulation of trash on any parcel or property.to remove trash Weed and Trash Abatement Penalty Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 13, Sections 13-151 through 13-159 Ordinances 052609-9 and 111213-16 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 37 of 66 Planning Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Zoning Verification Letter July 1, 2018 Fee for any verification of zoning required on site or property.$50 Zoning Verification Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 8.1, Section 8.1-8(c) Ordinance 052218-8. County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 38 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Adult Business Permit Fee October 25, 2005 Permit required by the Chief of Police to run an Adult Business $500 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Daily Boarding Fee for dog, cat, companion animal or other domestic animal January 26, 1999 Daily Boarding fee for any dog, cat, companion animal or other domestic animal for up to five days if identity cannot be verified and up to ten days for animals whose identity can be verified before adoption or disposal. $8.75 per day Pickup fee for first offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the first violation of Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 through 5-28. $20 Pickup fee for second offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the second violation of Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5- 23 through 5-28. $35 Pickup fee for third offense January 26, 1999 Fee for pickup by community service officers for the third violation of Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 through 5-28. $50 Police Fees Animal Boarding Services Fees Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 5, Article II, Sections 5-23 and 5-29 Ordinances 012699-14 and 120506-2 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 13, Article III, Section 13-101 Ordinance 102505-8 Adult Business Permit Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 39 of 66 Police Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Concealed Handgun Permit July 1, 2020 Fee for a original or renewal permit to carry a handgun or other firearm in a concealed fashion for a five year period. $40 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Criminal Justice Academy Fees June 22, 2010 Fee of $5 in every criminal or traffic case in which costs are assessable to support the County's criminal justice training academy $5 Code of Virginia §16.1-69.48:1, 17.1-275.2, 17.1-275.3, 17.1-275.4, 17.1-275.7, 17.1-275.8, and 17.1-275.9 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 2, Article I, Section 2-10 Ordinance 062210-5 Concealed Handgun Permit Roanoke County Resolution 092419-1 Code of Virginia §18.2-308.03 Criminal Justice Academy Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 40 of 66 Police Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount License for Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems August 11, 2015 Annual License For Dealer Of Precious Metals & Gems $200 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount False Alarm Fee for less than 4 dispatches per year November 19, 1991 Users of alarm services shall be allowed 4 false alarms, without fees, in any calendar year. $0 False Alarm Fee for 5th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 5th dispatch within one calendar year.$25 False Alarm Fee for 6th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 6th dispatch within one calendar year.$50 False Alarm Fee for 7th dispatch November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 7th dispatch within one calendar year.$100 False Alarm Fee for 8th and subsequent dispatches November 19, 1991 False alarm fee for the 8th and subsequent dispatches within one calendar year.$150 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article VIII, Section 16-26 Ordinance 111991-12 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16.1, Article III, Section 16.1-31 Ordinance 081115-3 Dealers of Precious Metals & Gems License Fee False Alarm Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 41 of 66 Police Fees Alarm inspection failure November 19, 1991 Following a fourth false alarm within one calendar year, users will be notified by the Police Department within thirty days of the fourth false alarm that an alarm system inspection is required. An inspection must be completed within thirty days of the receipt of notice from the alarm system company. Failure to return the completed inspection form to the Police Department within this thirty day period with result in a $100 Administrative fee. $100 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Fingerprinting Fee June 26, 1990 Fingerprinting Fee (Per Fingerprint Card) for any individual. Fee does not apply when at the request of another law-enforcement agency or authorized representative of the armed forces of the United States or the Commonwealth. The chief of police is authorized to waive this fee in connection with the fingerprinting of minors conducted by the department in connection with any public service project or promotion. $10 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Mopeds Traffic Violations December 11, 2012 Fine for safety violations for any moped which has an operating speed below 35 miles per hour. A moped shall be considered a motorcycle when operated at speeds in excess of 35 miles per hour. $50 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12-137 Ordinance 121112-6 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article IV, Section 16-11 Ordinance 62690-10 Fingerprinting Fee Mopeds Traffic Violations County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 42 of 66 Police Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Parade Permit Fee February 2, 1993 Fee for the processing of an application for a parade permit. The chief of police may waive the fee if the parade is to be conducted on behalf of a nonprofit or charitable organization. Not applicable to the Town of Vinton. $25 Parade Expenses February 2, 1993 Classes of parades may be established by the chief of police to determine ordinary costs of providing traffic control and other normal administrative costs to the county based upon the time, place, and manner of parades. Varies Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Parking Tickets - Double Parking February 24, 1998 Double parking ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Parking Over Allowed Time February 24, 1998 Parking over allowed time ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Unattended Motor in Operation February 24, 1998 Unattended motor in operation ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 14, Article II, Section 14-23 Ordinance 2993-4 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 12, Article III, Division 1, Section 12-51 Chapter 12-54 and 12-54.1 Ordinance 022498-10 Parking Tickets Parade Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 43 of 66 Police Fees Parking Tickets - Tractor Semi-Trailer/Recreational Vehicle in Residential Area February 24, 1998 Tractor semi-trailer/recreational vehicle/boat in residential area ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$5 Parking Tickets - Blocking Traffic February 24, 1998 Blocking traffic ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Parking in a Designated Space on County Property February 24, 1998 Parking in a designated space on county property ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Parking within 500 feet of Accident or Area of Emergency February 24, 1998 Parking within 500 feet of accident or area of emergency ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$25 Parking Tickets - Other Violations February 24, 1998 Any other violation ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Parking in Fire Lane or within 15 feet of Hydrant or Fire & Rescue Building February 24, 1998 Parking in fire lane, within 15 feet of hydrant or fire & rescue building ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$50 Parking Tickets - Parking in areas labeled as "No Parking" February 26, 1991 Parking in a no-parking zone ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 Parking Tickets - Parking within 20 Feet of an Intersection February 24, 1998 Parking within 20 feet of an intersection ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$15 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 44 of 66 Police Fees Parking Tickets - Parking in Area Designated as Handicapped without proper license plates or placards. February 24, 1998 Parking in area designated as handicapped without proper license plates or placards ($5 penalty if not paid in 10 days)$100 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Police E-Citation Fee July 1, 2018 A $5 fee assessed as part of the costs of each convicted or pre-payable criminal or traffic offense in the Roanoke County district and circuit courts used to fund software, hardware, and associated equipment costs for the implementation and maintenance of electronic summons (E-Citation) system. $5 Code of Virginia §17.1-279.1 Ordinance 052218-9 Police E-Citation Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 45 of 66 Police Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Sale of Records of Arrests and Offenses June 26, 1990 Police Department may charge a fee of $10 to defray the administrative cost of searching for and providing any records of arrests and offenses.$10 Traffic Accident Report Requests June 26, 1990 Police Department may charge a fee of $10 to defray the administrative cost of searching for and providing any records of accident reports.$10 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Chapter 16, Article IV, Section 16-10 and 16-12 Ordinance 62690-10 Sale of Records of Arrests, Offenses and Traffic Accident Reports County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 46 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Advertising Rates - Recreation Magazine January 1, 2017 Advertising Rates for Roanoke County Recreation Magazine. Rates vary.$350-$1800 per ad After Hours Splash Valley and Green Ridge Rentals January 1, 2017 After hours rentals for Splash Valley and Green Ridge facilities $600-$950 per event + $200-$375 extra hours After School for Kids (ASK)July 1, 2019 Bi-Monthly Program Rate for ASK program. $145 bi-monthly for one child, $135 bi-monthly for each additional child.$135 each additional child Athletics Camps July 1, 2019 Athletics Camps $99 100% County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - 100% County Residents per 2 hour block $40 50% or more County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - 50% or more County Residents per 2 hour block $50 Less than 50% County Residents July 1, 2019 Athletic Field Rental Rate - Less than 50% County Residents per 2 hour block $80 Brambleton Center Rentals July 1, 2019 Brambleton Center Room Rental Rates $35 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Ordinance 92794-11 Authorizes Parks, Recreation & Tourism Director to establish and change fees. Recreation Fees, Membership Fees, and Rentals County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 47 of 66 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Camp Director's Cabin Rental Payment - Camp Roanoke January 1, 2012 Camp Director's Cabin Rental Payment at Camp Roanoke per month.$400 per month Catawba Recreation Center Rentals January 1, 2000 Per hour cost for Catawba Recreation Center rentals.$25 per hour Cooking Classes Various Cooking Classes - 1-6 week sessions $15-$40 per class Crafts Classes Various Crafts Classes - 1-6 week sessions $25-$75 per class Dog Training Classes Various Dog Training Classes - 4-6 week sessions $140-$160 per class Drawing/Painting Classes Various Drawing/Painting Classes - 1-6 week sessions $25-$90 per class Educational/ Instructional Classes Various Educational/ Instructional Classes - 1-4 week sessions $10-$75 per class Equestrian Center Membership Various Equestrian Center Membership cost per year.$40-$80 per year Explore Park Building or and Other Rentals January 1, 2014 Explore Park Building or Outdoor Space Weddings and Other Rentals $600-$2200 per event Explore Park Room Rental - Taubman Upper Floor January 1, 2014 Per hour rental fee for the upper floor of the Arthur Taubman Center at Explore Park. $100 per hour Explore Park In-House Camps July 1, 2019 Explore Park In-House Camps $245 Explore Park Paddling Camp July 1, 2019 Explore Park Paddling Camp $340 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 48 of 66 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Explore Park Mountain Biking Camp July 1, 2019 Explore Park Mountain Biking Camp $340 Full Day Summer Camps November 1, 2018 Full Day Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included.$185-$330 per week Green Ridge Daily Admission - County Resident January 1, 2010 Green Ridge Daily Admission for County Residents $5-$7 per visit Green Ridge Daily Admission - Non-County Resident July 1, 2018 Green Ridge Daily Admission for Non-County Residents $11-$13 per visit County Resident July 1, 2018 Green Ridge Membership for County Residents including access to gymnasiums, wellness facility, indoor pool, and access to exercise classes. $19-$70 per month Non-County Resident July 1, 2018 Green Ridge Membership for Non-County Residents including access to gymnasiums, wellness facility, indoor pool, and access to exercise classes. $27-$81 per month Green Ridge Pool Party Rentals July 1, 2016 Green Ridge pool party rentals per event $160-$250 per event Green Ridge Room Rentals July 1, 2016 Per hour fee for room rentals at Green Ridge Recreation Center $60-$145 per hour at Green Ridge January 1, 2015 Group Swimming Lessons at Green Ridge - 4-6 week sessions $49-$70 per class Half Day Summer Camps November 2, 2018 Half Day Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included.$80-$155 per week Hobby Classes Various Hobby Classes - 1-6 week sessions $10-$60 per class Lifeguard Training Classes January 1, 2015 Per class fee for Lifeguard Training Classes.$200 per class County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 49 of 66 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Lose Big Wellness Class July 1, 2018 Lose Big Wellness Class - 12 week sessions $325-$450 per class Martial Arts Classes Various Martial Arts Classes - 1-6 week sessions $30-$60 per class Music & Dance Classes Various Music & Dance Classes - 1-6 week sessions $5-$60 per class My Fit Class July 1, 2020 My Fit nutrition and fitness class $145 Online Cooking Series July 1, 2020 Cost for all ages for online cooking classes $25 per class Outdoor Hikes/Environmental Education Programs Various Outdoor Hikes/Environmental Education Programs. Costs vary by program.$5-$45 per class Outdoor Trips and Excursions Various Parks, Recreation and Tourism provides opportunities for various outdoor trips and excursions. Costs vary between $40 and $250 per trip or excursion. $40-$250 per trip Overnight Summer Camps November 1, 2017 Overnight Summer Camps. Costs vary by programs included.$215-$600 per week Park Flyers Membership Various Park Flyers Membership for remote controlled model flying machines. Costs vary by programs included. $25-$50 per year Per event cost for Camp Roanoke Custom Outdoor Experiences January 1, 2016 Designed for groups interested in environmental education, team building or guided outdoor experiences $27.50-$40.00 per person Per event cost for Camp Roanoke Lodge, Ropes Course and Pavilion Rentals. Cost varies by facility. January 1, 2007 Kiwanis Lodge, Nature Cabin, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Pavilion Rentals $50-$300 per event County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 50 of 66 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Personal Training at Green Ridge July 1, 2018 Hourly Rate for Personal Training at Green Ridge $30-$50 per session Picnic Shelter Rentals January 1, 2015 Picnic shelter rental costs vary based on number of guests per event Pottery/Ceramics Classes September 1, 2014 Pottery/Ceramics Classes - 1-8 week sessions, including firing fees $50-$250 per class Prepared Food/Concessions Items at Splash Valley Various Prepared Food/Concessions Items at Splash Valley. Costs vary per item.$0.25-$16 per item Preschool Camps July 1, 2019 Preschool camps (does not include Camp Roanoke)$125 at Green Ridge October 1, 2017 Private swim lessons at Green Ridge session Retail Sales Items at Explore Park Gift Shop, Green Ridge & Splash Valley Various Retail Sales Items at Explore Park Gift Shop, Green Ridge & Splash Valley. Costs vary per item. $0.50-$400 per item Senior Van/Bus Excursions Various Van/Bus Excursions for Senior Citizens. Costs vary by program.$30-$400 per class Snow Day and School's Out Child Care Programs Various Fee for child care programs on snow days and other days during the school year when schools are closed. $30-$40 per class/day Splash Valley - Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17)$9 Splash Valley - Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54)$11 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 51 of 66 Parks, Recreation & Tourism Fees Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Ages 55 and up July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Ages 55 and up $7 Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Child (ages 3 to 17)$11 Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54) July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Adult (ages 18 to 54)$13 Splash Valley - Non- Resident/Ages 55 and up July 1, 2019 Splash Valley - Non-Resident/Ages 55 and up $9 Splash Valley Concessions July 1, 2019 Splash Valley Concessions Varies Splash Valley Season Pass July 1, 2019 Splash Valley Season Pass $75 to $95 Treetop Quest Daily Pass July 1, 2019 Full Day Pass for Treetop Quest at Explore Park $15 to $44 Treetop Quest Season Pass July 1, 2019 Season Pass for Treetop Quest at Explore Park $105 to $245 Wellness/Fitness Program July 1, 2019 Wellness/Fitness Program $51 Wellness/Group Exercise Classes Various Wellness/Group Exercise Classes - 1-6 week sessions $25-$75 per class County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 52 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests June, 8 2021 Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less.$0 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - black and white copies June, 8 2021 Records printed in black and white. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less. $0.10 per one- sided page $0.20 per double-sided page Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - color copies June, 8 2021 Records printed in color. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less. $0.16 per one- sided page $0.32 per double-sided page Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - audio or CDs June, 8 2021 FOIA request for audio or cdS. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less.$5 per CD Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - 24 by 36 inch maps June, 8 2021 FOIA request for map records formatted to 24 by 36 inches. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less.$7.00 per map Public Information Fees Code of Virginia § 2.2-3700 through 2.2-3714 Resolution 060821-2 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Charges County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 53 of 66 Public Information Fees Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - 36 by 48 inch maps June, 8 2021 FOIA request for map recrds formatted to 36 by 48 inches. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less.$10.00 per map Freedom of Information personnel hourly rate June, 8 2021 FOIA request requiring staff time to complete. Cost varies by staff required to complete the request. Roanoke County waives all charges for requests that total $5.00 or less. Varies County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 54 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount CORTRAN fee per trip July 1, 2019 CORTRAN provides public demand response transportation to qualified residents of Roanoke County. Charge of $5 is for each one-way trip. $5 one-way trip Public Transportation (CORTRAN) Fees Ordinance 052819-4 Budget Ordinance Adopting FY 2020 Budget and all Fee Changes Resolution 052819-1 Adopting a Fee Compendium CORTRAN Fee Per Trip County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 55 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Land Use Fee Initial Enrollment Fee September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of land, while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke County. For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are required after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. $30 Land Use Fee Additional Fee Per Acre September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of land, while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke County. For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are required after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. $0.30 per acre Land Use Fee Renewal Fee Every 6th year September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of land, while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke County. For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are required after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. $30 Real Estate Valuation Fees Code of Virginia: Title 58.1, Chapter 32, Article 4 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 21, Article 3, Sections 21-51 through 21-60 County of Roanoke, Virginia Ordinance Number 091499-8 Land Use Fees County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 56 of 66 Real Estate Valuation Fees Land Use Fee Renewal Fee Per Additional Acre September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of land, while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke County. For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are required after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. $0.30 per acre Land Use Fee Late Filing Penalty September 14, 1999 The Land Use Program is designed to encourage the preservation of land, while conserving natural beauty and open spaces within Roanoke County. For landowners that qualify for this program, enrollment fees are required after submission of a land use plan (Land Use Plan fee is $710). Annual revalidation is mandatory for landowners already participating in the program. $40 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 57 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Board of Prisoners - Salem July 1, 2019 Daily fee charged to the City of Salem, Virginia to board prisoners from that jurisdiction in the Roanoke County Jail. $50.94 per day Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Canteen Fees March 5, 2013 The Sheriff may establish a canteen or store for inmates to purchase certain goods and food. Revenue from these fees must be used for educational, recreational, or other purposes for the benefit of the inmates. Varies Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Daily Jail Fees April 11, 2010 Daily fee charged to inmates to offset jail costs. Revenue must be used for jail or sheriff purposes. Indigent inmates with no ability to pay are not charged. Per state code, fee is not to exceed $3 per day. $1 per day Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Finger Print Cards Provide authorized finger print cards for individuals requesting official finger print cards.$5 Sheriff and Jail Fees Code of Virginia 53.1-131.3 Daily Jail Fees Agreement between the City of Salem and Roanoke County Canteen Fees Board of Prisoners - Salem Fingerprint Cards Sheriff's Office bases charge on the local average cost of service Code of Virginia 53.1-127.1 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 58 of 66 Sheriff and Jail Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Home Electronic Monitoring April 6, 2020 Fees for home electronic monitoring equipment $129 first week, $91 each following week Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Medical Costs April 18, 2012 Inmates requiring medical care while in confinement may be charged for a portion of the care provided. Indigent inmates with no ability to pay cannot be denied care. Varies Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount In State Process Service March 21, 2019 Fee for process and service for instate residents $12 Out of State Process Service March 21, 2019 Fee for process and service for out of state residents $75 Medical Costs Code of Virginia 53.1-32 Process Service Code of Virginia 17.1-272 Home Electronic Monitoring Code of Virginia 53.1-131.2 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 59 of 66 Sheriff and Jail Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Sobrieter Fee April 6, 2020 Fee for sobrieter device to be installed on home telephone for post trial offenders $157 first week, $119 each following week Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Weekender Jail Fees April 6, 2006 Fee for inmates sentenced with the option of serving sentence on non- consecutive days during weekends. State code allows charges to be up to the actual cost of incarceration but shall not exceed the amount charged to the Compensation Board for purposes of reimbursement. $4 per day Drug Test Fee April 6, 2006 Fee for drug test kit for inmates sentenced with the option of serving sentence on non-consecutive days during weekends. $4 Weekender Jail Fees Code of Virginia 53.1-131.1 Sobrieter Code of Virginia 53.1-131.2 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 60 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Custody Investigations/Home Studies March 30, 2012 Fee for conducting a home study for individuals seeking custody of a child. Fee based on income to a maximum of $300. Amount established by appropriate Board of Social Services. Income based $0 to $300 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Guardianship fee March 6, 2013 Fee for processing the annual Guardianship Report required for court appointed guardians of incapacitated persons.$5 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Home Study for parental placement adoptions April 7, 2002 Fee for conducting a home study for individuals adopting a child through a parental placement. Amount established by appropriate Board of Social Services. $800 Code of Virginia 64.2-2020 Social Services Fees Code of Virginia 63.2-1248 Code of Virginia 16.1-274 Home Study for Parental Placement Adoptions Custody Investigations/Home Studies Guardianship Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 61 of 66 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Cat Tag, 1 year July 26, 2005 One year license for cats of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per cat and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. $10, $5 if neutered Cat Tag, 3 year July 26, 2005 Three year license for cats of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per cat and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. $27, $13.50 if neutered Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Dog Tag, 1 Year April 23, 2013 License for dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. Limit of 3 dogs per dwelling without a multiple dog permit. $10, $5 if neutered Dog Tag, 3 year April 23, 2013 License for dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. Limit of 3 dogs per dwelling without a multiple dog permit. $27, $13.50 if neutered Multiple Dog permit, up to 20 April 23, 2013 License for up to 20 dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. $67.50 for 3 years Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: (Chapter 5, Article 2, Divisions 1 - 2). Ordinance No. 042313-7. Animal Control - Dog Tags Treasurer Fees Code of Virginia § 3.2-6528 County Code Chapter 5, Article I1, Div. 2, Sec. 5-44 Animal Control - Cat Tags County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 62 of 66 Treasurer Fees Multiple Dog permit, up to 50 April 23, 2013 License for up to 50 dogs of owners who reside within Roanoke County. Fees are per dog and must be accompanied by proof of rabies vaccination. $94.50 for 3 years Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Dangerous Dog July 26, 2005 If a dog is legally declared a dangerous dog by any General District Court or Circuit Court in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the license fee is initially $150, then $85 to update and renew. $85 each subsequent year Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Collection Fee July 28, 1992 Collection fee to cover the administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. Fee is $20 for taxes collected prior to judgment and $25 for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. Code of Virginia allows $30 before judgment and $35 after judgment. $20 before judgment; $25 after judgment Code of Virginia § 58.1-3958 County Code Chapter 21, Article 1, Sec. 21-8 Ordinance No. 72891-10 Code of Virginia § 3.2-6540 Code of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: Chapter 5, Article II, Division 2 , § 5.44 Ordinance No. 072605-7. Dangerous Dog Ordinance No. 092413-6 Animal Control - Dangerous Dogs Collection Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 63 of 66 Treasurer Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Debt Set-Off Fee March 10, 2015 Fee for the collection of delinquent taxes or fees owed to the County through the Virginia Department of Taxation. Delinquent taxes or fees can be withheld from Virginia income tax refunds. (Virginia Department of Taxation can deduct up to 25% up to $25 as cost offset). Up to $25 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Judicial Tax Sale Fees March 10, 2015 Judicial tax sales may be held on properties which have delinquent taxes on or after December 31 following the second anniversary on which such taxes have become due. Fees for conducting the sale including advertising fees, any attorney fees, fees for title search, and any administrative fees may be charged as a part of the sale. Varies by judicial tax sale Code of Virginia § 58.1-3965 Code of Virginia § 58.1-520 through 58.1-535 Judicial Tax Sale Fees Debt Set-Off Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 64 of 66 Treasurer Fees Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Returned Check Fee September 22, 2009 Any check returned to the County due to insufficient funds in the account it was drawn on or if such account does not exist, a charge of $35 will apply. Code of Virginia allows up to $50. $35 Legislative Authorization Fee Effective Date Description Fee Amount Vehicle License Fee - 4,000 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for general vehicles weighing less than 4,000 pounds $20 Vehicle License Fee - General Vehicles more than 4,001 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for general vehicles weighing more than 4,001 pounds $25 Vehicle License Fee - Antique Vehicles January 1, 2009 One-time fee for vehicles registered as an antique vehicle with the Virginia DMV. No additional fees are due as long as antique vehicle registration is maintained. $5 Trailers January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for boat trailers $6.50 Code of Virginia § 46.2-752 County Code Chapter 12, Article 2, Sec. 12-29 Ordinance No. 031009-9 Code of Virginia § 15.2-106 County Code Chapter 2, Article 1, Sec. 2-3 Ordinance No. 092209-4 Returned Check Fee Vehicle License Fee County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 65 of 66 Treasurer Fees Vehicle License Fee - Farm Use Vehicles January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for vehicles registered for farm use $15 Vehicle License Fee - Motorcycles January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for motorcycles $15 Vehicle License Fee - Trailers less than 1,500 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing less than 1,500 pounds $8 Vehicle License Fee - Trailers between 1,501 and 4,000 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing between 1,501 and 4,000 pounds $18.50 Vehicle License Fee - Trailers over 4,001 pounds January 1, 2009 Annual license fee for trailers weighing more than 4,001 pounds $20 County of Roanoke, Virginia FY 2022-2023 Fee Compendium Page 66 of 66 Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $250 from Earle and Glenna Mackenzie for the County of Roanoke Fire & Rescue Department SUBMITTED BY: C. Travis Griffith Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Acceptance and appropriation of funds in the amount of $250 from Earle and Glenna Mackenzie to be used at Vinton Fire & Rescue Station #2 for EMS equipment. BACKGROUND: Earle and Glenna Mackenzie donated $250 to the County of Roanoke Fire & Rescue Department for rescue equipment at Vinton Station #2. The Mackenzies live in the Vinton area of Roanoke County and made a donation in memory of James Cecil. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $250 received from Earle and Glenna Mackenzie will be allocated to purchase EMS equipment at Vinton Station #2. No match is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance and setting the second reading for May 24, 2022. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $250 FROM EARLE AND GLENNA MACKENZIE FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT IN MEMORY OF JAMES CECIL WHEREAS, Earle and Glenna Mackenzie, citizens of the Vinton area, donated $250 to the County Fire and Rescue Department in memory of James Cecil; and WHEREAS, the funds received will be allocated to purchase rescue equipment at Vinton Station No. 2; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022, and the second reading was held on May 24, 2022. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sum of $250 made available to the Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department is accepted and appropriated to the general fund. 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance designating Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land (Tax Map Number 076.01-01-07.00-0000) SUBMITTED BY: Lindsay B. Webb Parks Planning and Development Manager APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Ordinance designating Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land (Tax Map Number 076.01-01-07.00-0000) BACKGROUND: Roanoke County possesses a parcel of real estate containing approximately 46.31 acres located at 5624 Longridge Drive, more commonly known as Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and further designated as Roanoke County Tax Map Number 076.01 -01-07.00-0000. Acquired in 1995, the property is forested, steep and undeveloped with a stream that crosses through the northern portion of the property. The property is currently m anaged and maintained as forested open space. County staff are proposing to place the parcel into a Stormwater Forest/Open Space Conservation Easement, as discussed below. DISCUSSION: Virginia Code § 10.1-1701 specifically authorizes the County, as a “public body” defined in Virginia Code § 10.1-1700, to designate any real property in which it has an interest of not less than five years duration to be retained and used for the preservation and Page 2 of 3 provision of open-space land, so long as the use of the real property for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the property is located. The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan encourages resource protection to preserve open space, stream, woodlands, critical slopes, and ridgelines. Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve is located within the Windsor Hill Community Planning Area, and it is identified as a key natural resource feature. The Future Land Use Designation for the property is Rural Preserve; however, the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement recommends it for Conservation due to the steep slopes. The northern portion of the property is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, and the southern portion of the property is zoned AG-3 Agricultural/Rural Preserve. The property is also adjacent and south of a Wellhead Protection Overlay District. These zoning designations support the preservation of remote rural residential, forested, and recreational areas. The use of Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the property is located. County staff recommend protecting and preserving Sugarloaf Mountain Nature Preserve by providing for open-space land on the property by restricting the use of the property, as set forth on the attached Deed Restriction. Once the Deed Restriction is recorded, and pursuant to Virginia Code § 10.1-1700, Sugarloaf Mountain Nature Preserve may continue to be used for (i) park or recreational purposes, (ii) conservation of land or other natural resources, (iii) historic or scenic purposes, (iv) assisting in the shaping of the character, direction, and timing of community development, (v) wetlands, or (vi) agricultural and forestal production. The purpose of this request is to provide water quality offsets for regulated land disturbing activities that occur, or will occur, on other lands owned by the County of Roanoke, in order to satisfy water quality requirements of Virginia’s Stormwater Management Regulations. Under these stormwater regulations, the County may utilize offsite stormwater management facilities located on Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve to meet the required phosphorus nutrient reductions from other off -site land- disturbing activities elsewhere in the County, on County owned lands. With the development of mountain bike trails, greenways and other recreational park amenities, Parks, Recreation and Tourism needs additional water quality offsets to satisfy water quality requirements. This deed restriction can be transf erred to another Roanoke County parcel in the future if a change in use for Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve was needed. The stormwater forest/open space at Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve will be available for use as soon as the Deed Restriction is recorded amongst the land records. Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling of the second reading on May 24, 2022. Prepared by: Rachel W. Lower Sr. Assistant County Attorney VSB: 88094 Office of the Roanoke County Attorney 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 This instrument is exempt from the imposition of recordation taxes and fees pursuant to Virginia Code §§ 58.1-811, 17.1-266, and 17.1-279 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia 5624 Longridge Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 076.01-01-07.00-0000 DEED RESTRICTION THIS DEED RESTRICTION is made this ___ day of ____________, 2022, by the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the “Owner”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner possesses a parcel of real estate containing approximately 46.31 acres, more commonly known as Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and further designated as Roanoke County Tax Map Number 076.01-01-07.00-0000 (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, Virginia Code § 10.1-1701 specifically authorizes the Owner, as a “public body” defined in Virginia Code § 10.1-1700, to designate any real property in which it has an interest of not less than five years’ duration to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land, so long as the use of the real property for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the property is located; and WHEREAS, the Owner intends to protect and preserve, in perpetuity, the entire Property as open-space land, as specifically set forth on the “EXHIBIT SHOWING STORMWATER FOREST/OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION EASEMENT (2,017,263.60 SF) BEING RESERVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY” dated February 23, 2022 and prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Development Services, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and 2 WHEREAS, the use of the Property for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the Property is located; and WHEREAS, the Owner intends to accomplish the protection and preservation of the entire Property, as fully depicted on the attached exhibit, for the purpose of (1) providing water quality offsets for regulated land disturbing activities that occur, or will occur, on other lands owned by the County of Roanoke (in order to satisfy water quality requirements of the State of Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations), and (2) providing for open-space land on the Property by restricting the use of the Property, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to create a public record of the intended formal designation of these enumerated areas by recordation of a deed restriction with the attached exhibit of the Property amongst the official land records maintained by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of the foregoing expressed purposes and in consideration of the public benefit to the citizens of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, which shall result from this public deed restriction, the Owner does hereby designate the Property, as specifically set forth on the attached exhibit, to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land; and The Owner retains the right to use the Property for those purposes enumerated in Virginia Code § 10.1-1700, including for (i) park or recreational purposes, (ii) conservation of land or other natural resources, (iii) historic or scenic purposes, (iv) assisting in the shaping of the character, direction, and timing of community development, (v) wetlands as defined in Virginia Code § 28.2-1300, or (vi) agricultural and forestal production; and The designations and restrictions contained in this Deed Restriction shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors in interest, and any subsequent purchaser or grantee of this Property; and The designations and restrictions contained in this Deed Restriction shall continue as a servitude running with the Property, and shall be included in any subsequent deed or conveyance of all or any part of the Property; and The Owner reserves the right to amend and rescind the designations and restrictions set forth in this Deed Restriction; and 3 Although it is the Owner’s intention that this Deed Restriction will benefit the public as described above, nothing contained herein shall be construed to convey to the public, or any member thereof, a right of access to or use of the Property without the express written consent of the Owner, and the Owner retains the exclusive right to such access and use, subject to the terms hereof; and This Deed Restriction is executed by Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator, on the ___ day of ____________, 2022, pursuant to the authority granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE AND SEAL: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY: _______________________________(SEAL) Richard L. Caywood County Administrator Approved as to form: __________________________________ County Attorney COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, to-wit: The foregoing Deed Restriction was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ______________, 2022, by Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. My Commission expires: __________________ ________________________________________ Notary Public West Mudlick Creek SUGARLOAFMOUNTAINMOUNT LAUREL DORSET CAROLYN MIDWAY LONGRIDGE Roanoke County Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve: Aerial Map ²Date: 4/22/2022 1 inch = 463 feet Intermittent StreamSugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve 0 210 420 630 840105Feet West Mudlick Creek SUGARLOAFMOUNTAIN BRAHMA WINNBROOK MOUNTLAUREL PELHAM SMOKEYRIDGE CAROLYN ELBERT WHIPPLETREE DORSETLONGRIDGE CASTLEVIEW MIDWAY Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve: Zoning Map ²Date: 4/19/2022 1 inch = 623 feet AG3ARR1R2Wellhead Protection OverlayIntermittent StreamSugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve 0 280 560 840 1,120140Feet Back Creek Cave Spring City of Roanoke City of Salem £¤221 UV419 2 1 3 3 3 7 6 4 5 8 Glenvar SUGARLOAF MTN. RD ELECTRIC GRANDIN GRANDIN ROAD ROSELAWN VIEW MUD LICK COLONIAL TWELVE OCLOCK KNOB MT CHESTNUT BOWERBRIDLE KEAGY CHAPARRAL LAKE CANYON GARST MILL CLUB LEVI DEYERLE 2 FORD MERRIMAN CRESTHILL KENWICK CASTLE ROCK CANTER CORDELLPELHAM KENTLAND MCVITTY PENN FOREST BRANDON POWELL CANTLE TITAN MANASSAS WINDSOR LAKELAND AVENEL PENGUIN IVY MOUNTAIN WARWOOD NORTHVIEW HAZEL LEE HI LUWANA BROOKFIELD CYNTHIA LARSON OVERBROOK CHESTERTON BEVERLY STONEY POINT POPLAR HILL POPLAR FAIRWAY FOREST WADE NORWOOD TILLETTCIRCLE GIESER CEDAR BEARING GLEN HEATHER VAUXHALL CAVALIER ETON POFF WALTONLEIGH POAGES MILL SCOTFORD OVERHILL DAVIS OAK CREST CLARA GIRARD BALSAM BRYMOOR DAWN PAR DOVER KELLY BOND GLENMONT DEAN HOMEWOOD VERONA BURNHAM BELLE AIRE RED OAK LILLY HILL JULIET EAGLE BEECHNUT HASTINGS KIPLING MEDMONT BLACKHORSE MEADOW CREEK CLEARVIEW SANDHURST PENNY LYTHAM FORE TALLWOOD CLUB CANTER ÜApril 21, 2022 Windsor Hills Future Land Use - Proposed Conservation - Sugar Loaf Mtn. (WVWA) Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature PreserveNeighborhood ConservationRural PreserveDevelopmentTransitionCore Proposed ConservationProposed TransitionProposed CoreProposed Neighborhood Conservation Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE DESIGNATING SUGAR LOAF MOUNTAIN NATURE PRESERVE, LOCATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, TO BE RETAINED AND USED FOR THE PRESERVATION AND PROVISION OF OPEN-SPACE LAND (TAX MAP NUMBER: 076.01- 01-07.00-0000) WHEREAS, the County owns a parcel of real estate containing approximately 46.31 acres, more commonly known as Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and further designated as Roanoke County Tax Map Number 076.01-01-07.00-0000 (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, Virginia Code § 10.1-1701 specifically authorizes the County, as a “public body” defined in Virginia Code § 10.1-1700, to designate any real property in which it has an interest of not less than five years’ duration to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open-space land, so long as the use of the real property for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the property is located; and WHEREAS, the County intends to protect and preserve, in perpetuity, the entire Property as open-space land, as specifically set forth on the “EXHIBIT SHOWING STORMWATER FOREST/OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION EASEMENT (2,017,263.60 SF) BEING RESERVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY” dated February 23, 2022, and prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Development Services, which is attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the use of the Property for open-space land conforms to the official comprehensive plan for the area in which the Property is located; and Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the County intends to accomplish the protection and preservation of the entire Property, as fully depicted on the attached exhibit, for the purpose of (1) providing water quality offsets for regulated land disturbing activities that occur, or will occur, on other lands owned by the County of Roanoke (in order to satisfy water quality requirements of the State of Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations), and (2) providing for open-space land on the Property by restricting the use of the Property, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the County desires to create a public record of the intended formal designation of these enumerated areas by recordation of a deed restriction with the attached exhibit of the Property amongst the official land records maintained by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the deed restriction be authorized by ordinance; and WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022 and the second reading was held on May 24, 2022; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sugar Loaf Mountain Nature Preserve is hereby designated as open- space land, and is to be retained and used for the preservation and provision of open- space land pursuant to Virginia Code § 10.1-1700 et seq. 2. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute the deed restriction, and any other such documents and Page 3 of 3 take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this item, all of which shall be on a form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 1 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinances to appropriate funds for: (a) Fiscal yea r 2022- 2023 operations budget and approval of the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023 for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (b) Fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; (c) Fiscal year 2022- 2023 transfer to and on behalf of the Roanoke County Public Schools budget for the County of Roanoke, Virginia (d) Fiscal year 2022-2023 operations budget for Roanoke County Public Schools; and (e) Fiscal year 2022-2023 capital budget for Roanoke County Public Schools SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Conduct second reading of five ordinances to appropriate funds for fiscal year 2022 - 2023 County of Roanoke and Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) operating and capital budgets, and approve the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023. BACKGROUND: The fiscal year 2022-2023 operating budget was presented to the Board of Supervisors on March 8, 2022. The fiscal year 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was presented to the Board of Supervisors on January 25, 2022. Public hearings on the budget were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022, to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed fiscal year 2022 - 2023 budget and the proposed fiscal year 2023-2032 Capital Improvement Program. Page 2 of 3 Attached for your approval are five budget appropriation ordinances for fiscal year 2022 - 2023 and the Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023. In order to separate RCPS funding from County funding and more clearly distinguish the appropriations of the Board of Supervisors, County staff has divided the appropriation into five ordinances. Each ordinance will be voted on separately. DISCUSSION: The total County budget for fiscal year 2022-2023 is $538,066,395 which includes all inter-fund and intra-fund transfers and all Schools funds. The County General Government Fund totals $220.62 million and is appropr iated as part of the County's operations ordinance ($154.25 million) and the transfers to and on behalf of Schools ordinance ($79.44 million). The budget is recommended to be appropriated in five separate budget ordinances. (a) The first budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $207,818,867 in fiscal year 2022-2023 for the County’s operations budget excluding transfers to and on behalf of the Schools. The ordinance also approves the County's Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023. (b) The second budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $22,570,146 in fiscal year 2022-2023 for the County's capital budget including the first year of the ten-year Capital Improvement Program. (c) The third budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $79,440,242 in fiscal year 2022-2023 for transfer to and on behalf of Roanoke County Public Schools. Transfers include operating funding as part of the County and Schools revenue sharing agreement, and transfers on behalf of the Schools to the Children's Services Act Fund. (d) The fourth budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $226,071,926 in fiscal year 2022-2023 for Schools operations. (e) The fifth budget ordinance provides funding in the amount of $2,165,214 in fiscal year 2022-2023 for the Schools' capital budget including the first year of the ten - year Capital Improvement Program. There have been no changes since the first reading of this ordinance on April 26, 2022. Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the fiscal year 2022-2023 budget appropriation ordinances provides funding for County and Schools operations, transfers and capital budgets effective July 1, 2022. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the five fiscal year 2022 -2023 budget appropriation ordinances. Staff also recommends approval of the attached Classification and Pay Plan for fiscal year 2022-2023. Page 1 of 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 OPERATIONS BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF THE CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022 concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was he ld on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 2 of 6 Appropriation Amount Revenues: 141,177,113$ 12,772,669 7,901,802 176,054 5,452,472 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - School Operations 401,874 Police E-Citation 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee 40,000 2,255,549 2,500 440,236 3,380,610 174,060,879 14,438,331 4,125,345 18,563,676 12,815,987 774,322 1,604,003 15,194,312 207,818,867$ Expenditures: 395,565$ 946,847 158,499 290,008 688,609 1,021,459 3,500,987 940,791 1,444,805 13,040,287 1,097,968 1,250,920 17,774,771 Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth's Attorney Sheriff's Office Treasurer Clerk of the Circuit Court Total Revenue - County Operations Funds Subtotal, Internal Service Funds General Administration General Government - County Operations: Subtotal, Constitutional Officers Constitutional Officers Board of Supervisors County Administration Internal Auditor Public Information Human Resources County Attorney Subtotal, General Administration General Government Communications & Information Technology Children's Services Act General Fund - County: County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2022-2023 County Operations First Reading April 26, 2022; Second Reading May 10, 2022 Public Works Projects Recreation Fee Class Grants & Other Funds Police Special Programs Criminal Justice Academy Internal Service Fund - Health Insurance Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Fleet Service Center Subtotal, General Fund Internal Service Fund - Dental Insurance Debt Service Fund - from County Debt Service Fund - from Schools Subtotal, Debt Service Fund Page 3 of 6 Appropriation Amount 257,068$ 103,440 1,590 39,086 520,144 50,000 971,328 954,541 2,601,558 3,556,099 14,797,883 19,565,512 34,363,395 557,437 Development Services 3,467,602 Planning 2,294,836 8,990,155 15,310,030 5,415,664 579,181 13,365,450 4,534,330 87,097 551,823 24,533,545 2,724,380 10,742,753 2,290,243 1,632,143 50,000 43,605 2,093,025 19,576,149 Transfer to Communications & Information Technology Miscellaneous Board Contingency Addition to Fund Balance Subtotal, Non-Departmental Contributions - Discretionary, Contractual, Dues & Memberships General Government Expenditure Contingency Library Elections (Registrar) Subtotal, Human Services Non-Departmental Employee Benefits Virginia Cooperative Extension Social Services Subtotal, Public Safety Community Services Economic Development Subtotal, Management Services Public Safety Police Fire & Rescue General Services Subtotal, Community Services Human Services Parks, Recreation, & Tourism Public Health Management Services Real Estate Valuation (Assessor) Finance & Management Services General District Court Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court Court Service Unit Courthouse Maintenance Subtotal, Judicial Administration Magistrate Circuit Court Judicial Administration Page 4 of 6 Appropriation Amount 14,262,853$ 2,859,300 1,934,000 2,154,003 Transfer to Criminal Justice Academy 204,599 176,054 21,590,809 141,177,113$ Communications & Information Technology 12,772,669$ Children's Services Act 7,901,802 Public Works Projects 176,054 Recreation Fee Class 5,452,472 Parks, Recreation & Tourism - School Operations 401,874 Police E-Citation 60,000 Community Development Technology Fee 40,000 Grants & Other Funds 2,255,549 Police Special Programs 2,500 Criminal Justice Academy 440,236 Fleet Service Center 3,380,610 174,060,879 18,563,676 12,815,987 774,322 1,604,003 15,194,312 207,818,867$ Transfer to Public Works Projects Subtotal, Transfers to Other Funds Total, General Government - County Operations Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt Service - County & Schools Transfer to County Capital Transfer to Children's Services Act - County Transfer to Internal Services - Risk Management Total Expenditures - All County Operations Funds Total, General Fund - County Operations Debt Service Fund Internal Service Fund - Health Insurance Internal Service Fund - Dental Insurance Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Total, Internal Service Funds Page 5 of 6 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another. 3. That all funded outstanding operating encumbrances at June 30, 2022, are re- appropriated to the 2022-2023 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That all General Government Fund unexpended appropriations and all General Government revenues collected in excess of appropriated revenues at the end of any fiscal year not lapse but shall be re-appropriated and presented to the Board of Supervisors for allocation based on guidance provided in Section 10- 1 through 5 of the County of Roanoke Comprehensive Financial Policy as approved by the Board of Supervisors. 5. Account balances remaining in the Fee Class Fund collected by the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department will be allocated to accounts as defined by the Fee Class Accounts Procedure. 6. Account balances remaining in Children’s Services Act (C111), Police Confiscated Property (C120), Police Special Programs (C121), Forfeited Asset Sharing (C122), Sheriff Confiscated Property (C123), Sheriff Jail Fees (C124), Inventory Accounts (C125), Criminal Justice Academy (C126), Police Training Facility (C127), Garage - Fleet Service Center (C130), Motor Pool (C132), Grants (C135), Communications and Information Technology (C141-C144), Fee Class (C150), PRT Schools Ground Maintenance (C151), Public Works Fund (C170), South Peak Community Development Authority (C201), County Page 6 of 6 Debt Fund (C310, C320, C330, C340, C360, C365, C375), County Capital and Economic Development Funds (C420, C421, C425, C428, C440, C445, C451, C455, C475), County Trust Funds (C501, C502), Internal Service Funds (C700, C705, C710), Special Welfare (C810), Regional Fire/Rescue Training Center (C814), Commonwealth Fund (C815), and Economic Development Authority (C818) funds will carry over 100% and be re-appropriated to the individual funds. 7. That the Board of Supervisors anticipates receiving various grants, donations, and other miscellaneous revenues. These anticipated funds are appropriated to the Grants Fund for the various functions and purposes as provided therein, and said appropriation shall be acknowledged and allocated to the appropriate fund upon approval by the Board of Supervisors on the Consent Agenda. 8. That the Board of Supervisors approves the County of Roanoke Classificatio n and Pay Plan. The Classification and Pay Plan included as part of this ordinance is effective July 1, 2022. The County Administrator shall implement the County Classification and Pay Plan pursuant to Board of Supervisors Resolution 082515-1. 9. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 CAPITAL BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 26, 2022 and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 2 of 3 Appropriation Amount Revenues: 5,765,000$ 3,680,146 125,000 13,000,000 22,570,146$ Expenditures: 3,665,000$ 7,350,000 1,525,146 2,455,000 6,875,000 18,205,146 700,000 22,570,146$ Lease / Revenue Bonds Total Expenditures - County Capital FY 2022 Capital Year Budget - Internal Services County Capital: FY 2022 Capital Fund supported by General Government Fund excluding General Government Transfers to CIP & Fleet Replacement Subtotal, FY 2022 Capital Year Budget Total Revenue - County Capital FY 2022 Capital Year Budget - Public Safety FY 2022 Fleet Replacement Budget FY 2022 Capital Year Budget - Community Services FY 2022 Capital Year Budget - Human Services County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2022-2023 County Capital First Reading April 26, 2022; Second Reading May 10, 2022 County Capital: Transfer from General Government Fund County Unrestricted Cash (excl. Transfer from General Govt. Fund) County Restricted Cash Page 3 of 3 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one project to another so as to provide for the completion of a capital project. 3. That all funded outstanding capital encumbrances at June 30, 2022, are re- appropriated to the 2022-2023 fiscal year to the same account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for capital projects at June 30, 2022, and appropriations in the 2022-2023 fiscal year budget. 5. That the Board of Supervisors anticipates receiving various grants, donations, and other miscellaneous revenues. These anticipated funds are appropriated to the Grants Fund for the various functions and purposes as provided therein, and said appropriation shall be acknowledged and allocated to the appropriate fund upon approval by the Board of Supervisors on the Consent Agenda. 6. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 TRANSFERS TO AND ON BEHALF OF ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, publ ic hearings were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of th e 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 2 of 3 Appropriation Amount Revenues: 79,440,242$ 79,440,242$ Expenditures: 77,561,242$ 1,879,000 79,440,242$ County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Schools Revenue Sharing Transfer and Children's Services Act Transfer First Reading April 26, 2022; Second Reading May 10, 2022 General Government Fund Total Expenditures - Schools Transfers General Government Fund Transfer to Schools Operations Transfer to Children's Services Act on behalf of Schools Total Revenue - Schools Transfers Page 3 of 3 2. That the transfer to Roanoke County Public Schools for operating per the County and School revenue sharing agreement shall be transferred in its entirety. 3. That the transfers made by Roanoke County on behalf of Roanoke County Public Schools to the Children’s Services Act Fund shall be transferred in its entirety. 4. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 OPERATIONS BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, publ ic hearings were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Ch arter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 2 of 3 Appropriation Amount Revenues: 172,114,823$ 2,019,902 1,581,182 5,653,645 8,195,007 7,369,040 6,987,508 Health Insurance 19,943,933 Dental Insurance 1,690,566 Risk Management 383,500 OPEB Trust 132,820 226,071,926$ Expenditures: 172,114,823$ 2,019,902$ Fleet Replacement 1,581,182$ Technology Replacement 5,653,645$ Grants 8,195,007$ Student Activity Fund 7,369,040$ 6,987,508$ 19,943,933$ 1,690,566$ 383,500$ 132,820$ 226,071,926$ Student Activity Fund OPEB Trust Instructional Resources Fleet Replacement Technology Replacement County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Roanoke County Public Schools Operations First Reading April 26, 2022; Second Reading May 10, 2022 General Nutrition Grants Schools Operating Funds: Total Expenditures - Schools Operating Funds Total Revenue - Schools Operating Funds Schools Operating Funds: General Nutrition Nutrition Health Insurance Dental Insurance Risk Management Page 3 of 3 2. That all funded outstanding operating encumbrances at June 30, 2022, are re- appropriated to the 2022-2023 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 3. That all appropriations unexpended and remaining at the end of this fiscal year shall, pursuant to Section 22.1-100 of the Code of Virginia, revert to the fund of the Board of Supervisors from which derived, with the expectation that such funds will be re-appropriated back to Roanoke County Public Schools for use the next year, in accordance with Section 10 -6 of the County’s Comprehensive Financial Policy. 4. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023 CAPITAL BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, public hearings were held on April 12, 2022 and April 26, 2022, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, for the functions and purposes indicated: Page 2 of 3 Appropriation Amount Revenues: 2,165,214 2,165,214$ Expenditures: 685,179 685,178 Capital Maintenance Plan 419,857 375,000 2,165,214$ County of Roanoke, Virginia Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Roanoke County Public Schools Capital First Reading April 26, 2022; Second Reading May 10, 2022 Schools Cash Sources Schools Capital Schools Capital Total Revenue - Schools Capital Total Expenditures - Schools Capital Glen Cove Elementary School Renovation Other Minor Capital Items & Contingency W.E. Cundiff Elementary School Renovation Page 3 of 3 2. That all funded outstanding capital encumbrances at June 30, 2022, are re- appropriated to the 2022-2023 fiscal year to the same account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 3. That all appropriations unexpended and remaining at the end of this fiscal year shall, pursuant to Section 22.1-100 of the Code of Virginia, revert to the fund of the Board of Supervisors from which derived, with the expectation that such funds will be re-appropriated back to Roanoke County Public Schools for use the next year, in accordance with Section 10 -6 of the County’s Comprehensive Financial Policy. 4. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for capital projects at June 30, 2022, and appropriations in the 2022-2023 fiscal year budget. 5. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2022. Roanoke County Classification Plan Attachment A – Public Safety Step Structures In order to recruit and retain employees in critical public safety positions for Police, Fire & Rescue, Sheriff and Emergency Communications, certain positions have been removed from the Classification Plan format which combines all other jobs. Each of these departments will have a step pay structure that identifies the employee pay based on rank and step. The Public Safety pay structures are anchored to the starting rate shown at the lowest level and progress with time in job and promotion in rank. The Public Safety pay structures is being implemented over a period of 3 years. The implementation period began July 2021 and employees will be in their appropriate step as of July 2023, subject to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors. Attachment B – Classification Plan The Classification Plan provides a summary of all Roanoke County jobs, the pay range and number of employees assigned to each job. The County transitioned to the attached Classification Plan, which includes step structures for public safety and a Decision Band Method (DBM) based classification for non-public safety employees. The grading hierarchy of the Decision Band Method is illustrated by an alpha-numeric nomenclature and is determined by the level of decision making required for the job. Attachment C – Pay Bands The Pay Bands attachment shows the minimum and maximum pay rates assigned to the pay band. Attachment A Public Safety Step Structures Attachment A: Roanoke County Classification Plan - Public Safety Step Structures Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Step 15 Step 16 Step 17 Step 18 Step 19 Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 Step 23 Step 24 Step 25 CHIEF ASST CHIEF $87,770 $89,745 $91,764 $93,829 $95,940 $98,098 $100,306 $102,563 $104,870 $106,181 $107,508 $108,852 $110,213 $111,590 $112,985 $114,398 $115,828 $117,276 $118,741 $120,226 $121,729 $123,250 $124,791 $126,351 $127,930 COMMANDER $70,216 $71,796 $73,411 $75,063 $76,752 $78,479 $80,245 $82,050 $83,896 $84,945 $86,007 $87,082 $88,170 $89,272 $90,388 $91,518 $92,662 $93,820 $94,993 $96,181 $97,383 $98,600 $99,833 $101,081 $102,344 SERGEANT $61,057 $62,431 $63,836 $65,272 $66,741 $68,242 $69,778 $71,348 $72,953 $73,865 $74,788 $75,723 $76,670 $77,628 $78,599 $79,581 $80,576 $81,583 $82,603 $83,635 $84,681 $85,739 $86,811 $87,896 $88,995 PO IV $53,093 $54,288 $55,509 $56,758 $58,035 $59,341 $60,676 $62,042 $63,438 $64,231 $65,033 $65,846 $66,669 $67,503 $68,347 $69,201 $70,066 $70,942 $71,828 $72,726 $73,635 $74,556 $75,488 $76,431 $77,387 PO III $50,565 $51,703 $52,866 $54,056 $55,272 $56,515 $57,787 $59,087 $60,417 $61,172 $61,937 $62,711 $63,495 $64,288 $65,092 $65,906 $66,729 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 $67,564 PO II $48,157 $49,241 $50,349 $51,481 $52,640 $53,824 $55,035 $56,274 $57,540 $58,259 $58,987 $59,725 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 $60,471 PO I $45,864 $46,896 $47,951 $49,030 $50,133 $51,261 $52,415 $53,594 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 $54,800 RECRUIT $44,100 Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Step 15 Step 16 Step 17 Step 18 Step 19 Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 Step 23 Step 24 Step 25 CHIEF DEPUTY CHIEF $83,143 $85,014 $86,927 $88,883 $90,883 $92,928 $95,018 $97,156 $99,342 $100,584 $101,841 $103,114 $104,403 $105,708 $107,030 $108,368 $109,722 $111,094 $112,482 $113,888 $115,312 $116,753 $118,213 $119,691 $121,187 BATTLN CHIEF $66,515 $68,011 $69,542 $71,106 $72,706 $74,342 $76,015 $77,725 $79,474 $80,467 $81,473 $82,492 $83,523 $84,567 $85,624 $86,694 $87,778 $88,875 $89,986 $91,111 $92,250 $93,403 $94,570 $95,752 $96,949 CAPTAIN $57,839 $59,140 $60,471 $61,832 $63,223 $64,645 $66,100 $67,587 $69,108 $69,972 $70,846 $71,732 $72,628 $73,536 $74,455 $75,386 $76,329 $77,283 $78,249 $79,227 $80,217 $81,220 $82,235 $83,263 $84,304 LIEUTENANT $53,804 $55,014 $56,252 $57,518 $58,812 $60,135 $61,488 $62,872 $64,286 $65,090 $65,903 $66,727 $67,561 $68,406 $69,261 $70,127 $71,003 $71,891 $72,789 $73,699 $74,621 $75,553 $76,498 $77,454 $78,422 MSTR PARA/FF $51,242 $52,394 $53,573 $54,779 $56,011 $57,272 $58,560 $59,878 $61,225 $61,990 $62,765 $63,550 $64,344 $65,148 $65,963 $66,787 $67,622 $68,467 $69,323 $70,190 $71,067 $71,956 $72,855 $73,766 $74,688 PARAMEDIC/FF $48,801 $49,900 $51,022 $52,170 $53,344 $54,544 $55,772 $57,026 $58,310 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 $59,038 FF/EMT $44,772 $45,779 $46,809 $47,863 $48,940 $50,041 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 $51,167 Recruit $43,050 Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Step 15 Step 16 Step 17 Step 18 Step 19 Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 Step 23 Step 24 Step 25 SHERIFF LT Colonel $83,999 $85,889 $87,822 $89,798 $91,818 $93,884 $95,996 $98,156 $100,365 $101,619 $102,890 $104,176 $105,478 $106,796 $108,131 $109,483 $110,852 $112,237 $113,640 $115,061 $116,499 $117,955 $119,430 $120,923 $122,434 Captain $67,199 $68,711 $70,257 $71,838 $73,455 $75,107 $76,797 $78,525 $80,292 $81,296 $82,312 $83,341 $84,382 $85,437 $86,505 $87,586 $88,681 $89,790 $90,912 $92,049 $93,199 $94,364 $95,544 $96,738 $97,947 Lieutenant $58,434 $59,749 $61,093 $62,468 $63,874 $65,311 $66,780 $68,283 $69,819 $70,692 $71,575 $72,470 $73,376 $74,293 $75,222 $76,162 $77,114 $78,078 $79,054 $80,042 $81,043 $82,056 $83,082 $84,120 $85,172 Sergeant $54,357 $55,580 $56,831 $58,110 $59,417 $60,754 $62,121 $63,519 $64,948 $65,760 $66,582 $67,414 $68,257 $69,110 $69,974 $70,849 $71,734 $72,631 $73,539 $74,458 $75,389 $76,331 $77,285 $78,251 $79,229 Master Deputy IV $50,565 $51,703 $52,866 $54,056 $55,272 $56,515 $57,787 $59,087 $60,417 $61,172 $61,937 $62,711 $63,495 $64,288 $65,092 $65,906 $66,729 $67,564 $68,408 $69,263 $70,129 $71,006 $71,893 $72,792 $73,702 Master Deputy III $48,157 $49,241 $50,349 $51,481 $52,640 $53,824 $55,035 $56,274 $57,540 $58,259 $58,987 $59,725 $60,471 $61,227 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 $61,992 Master Deputy II $45,864 $46,896 $47,951 $49,030 $50,133 $51,261 $52,415 $53,594 $54,800 $55,485 $56,178 $56,881 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 $57,592 Deputy Sheriff $43,680 $44,663 $45,668 $46,695 $47,746 $48,820 $49,919 $51,042 $52,190 $52,843 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 $53,503 Recruit $42,000 Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Step 15 Step 16 Step 17 Step 18 Step 19 Step 20 Step 21 Step 22 Step 23 Step 24 Step 25 ECC MANAGER $69,080 $70,635 $72,224 $73,849 $75,511 $77,210 $78,947 $80,723 $82,540 $83,571 $84,616 $85,674 $86,745 $87,829 $88,927 $90,038 $91,164 $92,303 $93,457 $94,625 $95,808 $97,006 $98,218 $99,446 $100,689 SUPERVISOR $54,826 $56,059 $57,321 $58,610 $59,929 $61,278 $62,656 $64,066 $65,508 $66,326 $67,155 $67,995 $68,845 $69,705 $70,577 $71,459 $72,352 $73,257 $74,172 $75,099 $76,038 $76,989 $77,951 $78,925 $79,912 TRAINING OFFICER $48,093 $49,175 $50,281 $51,413 $52,569 $53,752 $54,962 $56,198 $57,463 $58,181 $58,908 $59,645 $60,390 $61,145 $61,909 $62,683 $63,467 $64,260 $65,063 $65,877 $66,700 $67,534 $68,378 $69,233 $70,098 CO II $42,560 $43,518 $44,497 $45,498 $46,522 $47,568 $48,639 $49,733 $50,852 $51,488 $52,131 $52,783 $53,443 $54,111 $54,787 $55,472 $56,165 $56,867 $57,578 $58,298 $59,027 $59,765 $60,512 $61,268 $62,034 CO I $38,000 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 $38,855 Emergency Communications POLICE MARKET FIRE & RESCUE MARKET SHERIFF CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER Attachment B Classification Plan Fund Legend: CAO: Information Technology Fund; CMS: Communications Shop Fund; CON: Constitutional Officer; CP: Career Path; ECC: Emergency Communications Center Fund; FEE: PRT Fee ClassFund; FSF: Fleet Service Center Fund; GGF: General Government Fund; GNT: Grant Fund; RCA: RCACP; SCH: PRT School Ground Maintenance Fund; SHA: Shared Servcies; UNC: Unclassified Status Legend: NOEX: Non-Exempt from FLSA EXE/Com: Exempt Compensatory EXE/DISC: Exempt Discretionary DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM A13 GGF J-1385 1360 COURIER NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 27,940.35$ 34,042.34$ 40,144.32$ A13 GGF J-1731 1758 CUSTODIAN NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 4 27,940.35$ 34,042.34$ 40,144.32$ A13 GGF J-1746 1776 REFUSE COLLECTOR NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 5 27,940.35$ 34,042.34$ 40,144.32$ B21 FEE J-1806 1856 AQUATICS SPECIALIST (FEE)NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1732 1759 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 2 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1962 2066 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 6 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1277 1242 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT I NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 ECC J-1459 1432 E-911 CALL TAKER NOEX COMMIT 2 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1203 1153 INCOME TAX COORDINATOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-2037 2144 LIBRARY ASSISTANT NOEX LIBRARY 13 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 SCH J-1842 1892 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I (SCHOOL)NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 CP J-1661 2388 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 4 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 CP J-1841 1891 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 13 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1590 1584 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1743 1773 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1845 1899 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1535 1537 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX POLICE 2 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1332 1298 OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1853 1906 PARKS & FACILITY SERVICE TECHNICIAN NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1851 1904 PARKS CLERK NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 CP J-1664 2392 PERMIT TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 CP J-1536 1540 RECORDS TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX POLICE 6 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1870 1936 RECREATION TECHNICIAN NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1179 1124 SECRETARY NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1977 2085 SOCIAL SERVICES AIDE NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1206 1156 TAX CLERK I *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 5 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B21 GGF J-1351 1321 TREASURER CLERK I NOEX TREASURER 2 32,334.12$ 39,395.65$ 46,457.18$ B22 GGF J-1950 2050 ACCOUNTS COORDINATOR NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1379 1354 ACCOUNTS REPRESENTATIVE NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1239 1192 ACCREDITATION SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 RCA J-2150 2233 ANIMAL SUPPORT ATTENDANT NOEX RCACP 11 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1955 2056 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 28 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CP J-1727 1752 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH I *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 7 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1228 1183 CIVIL PROCESS SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1357 1327 COLLECTIONS SPECIALIST NOEX TREASURER 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CMS J-1458 1431 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT INSTALLER NOEX COMMIT 2 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1229 1184 CONTROL ROOM OPERATOR NOEX SHERIFF 2 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GNT J-1984 2092 CSA COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ Attachment B: DBM Classification Job Listing FY 2022 - 2023 DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM B22 GGF J-1755 1786 CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-2034 2139 DEPARTMENT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX LIBRARY 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1278 1243 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT II NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 3 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1734 1761 EQUIPMENT TECHNICIAN NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 FSF J-1739 1767 FLEET MECHANIC I *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 8 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1832 1882 HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1178 1123 LEGAL SECRETARY NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 3 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 SCH J-1842 1894 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II (SCHOOL)NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CP J-1661 2401 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CP J-1841 1893 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CAO J-1476 1457 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX COMMIT 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1662 2390 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1742 1772 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 FSF J-1753 1784 OFFICE COORD/DEPT BUDGET SPECIALIST (FLEET)NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CP J-1664 2393 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1204 1154 REAL ESTATE CLERK II NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 CP J-1536 1538 RECORDS TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX POLICE 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1895 1961 RECREATION SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-2043 SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT NOEX LIBRARY 11 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1206 1157 TAX CLERK II *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GGF J-1352 1322 TREASURER CLERK II NOEX TREASURER 3 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B22 GNT J-1181 1126 VICTIM/WITNESS ASSISTANT COORD (GRANT)NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 36,714.78$ 44,732.90$ 52,751.02$ B23 GGF J-1391 1367 ACCOUNTS REPRESENTATIVE II NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1225 1180 ACCREDITATION SPECIALIST NOEX SHERIFF 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1597 1604 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1691 2325 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX PLANNING 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1525 1525 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX POLICE 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1951 2051 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-2075 2200 ASST GENERAL REGISTRAR NOEX REGISTRAR 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 CP J-1727 1753 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH II *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1200 1150 BUSINESS ORDINANCE INSPECTOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1279 1244 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT III NOEX CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 6 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1965 2069 FAMILY SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 33 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 FSF J-1739 1766 FLEET MECHANIC II *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 RCA J-2156 2238 FOSTER COORDINATOR NOEX RCACP 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 CP J-1654 2380 INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1820 1871 MARKETING & ELECTRONIC SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1672 2389 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1887 1895 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1856 1909 PARKS MAINTENANCE SERVICE SPECIALIST NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 CP J-1664 2394 PERMIT TECHNICIAN III *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1396 1372 PURCHASING TECHNICIAN NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM B23 GGF J-1866 RECREATION PROGRAMMER NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 6 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 FEE J-1867 1928 RECREATION PROGRAMMER (FEE)NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 RCA J-2161 2241 RESCUE & VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR NOEX RCACP 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1974 2082 SELF SUFFICIENCY SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 6 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1979 2087 SENIOR BENEFIT PROGRAMS SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 4 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1749 1780 SOLID WASTE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 23 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 CP J-1674 2405 STORMWATER INSPECTOR I *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 5 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1206 1158 TAX CLERK III *CP NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1207 1160 TAX COMPLIANCE DEPUTY NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1970 2078 TECHNICAL ANALYST I NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 ECC J-1487 1473 TECHNICAL ANALYST I (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1481 1463 TECHNICAL ANALYST I *CP NOEX COMMIT 5 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-2044 2153 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES COORDINATOR NOEX LIBRARY 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 SHA J-1152 1102 TELEVISION PRODUCER NOEX RVTV 3 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GGF J-1353 1323 TREASURER CLERK III NOEX TREASURER 3 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GNT J-1182 1127 VICTIM/WITNESS ASST DIRECTOR (GRANT)NOEX COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B23 GNT J-1301 1271 YOUTH SURVEILLANCE OFFICER (GRANT)NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 2 41,095.24$ 50,070.06$ 59,044.88$ B24 GGF J-2149 2243 ANIMAL HEALTH ATTENDANT NOEX RCACP 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 CP J-1383 1358 BUYER *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 3 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 CP J-1654 2379 COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 CMS J-1463 1440 COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN NOEX COMMIT 4 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 RCA J-2153 2235 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR NOEX RCACP 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1589 1598 FIRE LOGISTICS TECHNICIAN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 FSF J-1739 1768 FLEET MECHANIC III *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1968 2076 FRAUD INVESTIGATOR NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1658 2385 GIS SPECIALIST NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1105 1065 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST I NOEX HUMAN RESOURCES 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1534 1532 INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT SPECIALIST NOEX POLICE 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1985 2094 JUVENILE INTERVENTION SERVICES SPECIALIST (GRANT)NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 RCA J-2160 2232 MAINTENANCE TECH/CUSTODIAN NOEX RCACP 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1852 1905 PARKS CREW LEADER NOEX PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1393 1369 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 3 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1696 2331 PLANNER I NOEX PLANNING 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1333 1299 REAL ESTATE & LAND USE COORDINATOR NOEX REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1205 1155 REAL ESTATE CLERK SUPERVISOR NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1964 2068 SR FAMILY SERVICES SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 6 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1980 2088 SR SELF SUFFICIENCY SPECIALIST NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 CP J-1674 2406 STORMWATER INSPECTOR II *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1208 1159 TAX CLERK IV NOEX COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 ECC J-1487 1474 TECHNICAL ANALYST II (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1481 1464 TECHNICAL ANALYST II *CP NOEX COMMIT 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B24 GGF J-1354 1324 TREASURER CLERK SUPERVISOR NOEX TREASURER 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM B25 GGF J-1957 2061 BENEFIT PROGRAMS TRAINER NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 FSF J-1739 1769 FLEET MECHANIC IV *CP NOEX GENERAL SERVICES 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1106 1066 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST II NOEX HUMAN RESOURCES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1665 2395 PERMIT TECHNICIAN SUPERVISOR NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 CP J-1383 1376 SENIOR BUYER *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1393 1385 SENIOR PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1976 2084 SERVICES TRAINER NOEX SOCIAL SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 CP J-1654 2397 SR COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 CP J-1674 2407 STORMWATER INSPECTOR III *CP NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1668 2402 STORMWATER MAINTENANCE FOREMAN NOEX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 ECC J-1487 1475 TECHNICAL ANALYST III (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B25 GGF J-1481 1465 TECHNICAL ANALYST III *CP NOEX COMMIT 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B31 CP J-1325 1290 APPRAISER I *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION 7 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 FEE J-1825 BUSINESS SERVICES SUPERVISOR (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 GGF J-1280 DEPUTY CLERK CIRCUIT COURT IV EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 4 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 GGF J-1656 2383 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COORDINATOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 GGF J-1730 1756 GENERAL SERVICES CREW LEADER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 GGF J-2039 2146 LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 FEE J-1840 1890 MEMBERSHIP SUPERVISOR (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B31 GGF J-1748 1778 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FOREMAN EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 2 46,580.79$ 56,753.64$ 66,926.50$ B32 GGF J-1652 2376 CHIEF INSPECTOR/FIELD SUPV EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1000 1000 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP ADMINISTRATION 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1075 1040 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 FSF J-1754 1785 FLEET SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 RCA J-2158 2240 KENNEL MANAGER EXE/COMP RCACP 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 FEE J-1847 1900 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1854 1907 PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 SCH J-1855 1908 PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR (SCHOOL)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1537 1539 POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP POLICE 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1868 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 5 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 FEE J-1869 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 3 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1741 1771 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1183 1128 VICTIM WITNESS DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT EXE/COMP COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ B32 GGF J-1752 1782 WELDING SHOP SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,158.34$ 64,767.61$ 76,376.88$ C41 GGF J-2026 2131 ADMINISTRATIVE & MARKETING MANAGER EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CP J-1325 1300 APPRAISER II *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1005 1003 ASSISTANT TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP ADMINISTRATION 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-2084 2201 ASST DIRECTOR & ELECTION MANAGER EXE/COMP REGISTRAR 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1956 BENEFIT PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 4 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-2031 BRANCH LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1375 1350 BUDGET ANALYST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1455 1428 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM C41 GGF J-1576 1580 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1810 1861 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1528 1528 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP POLICE 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1226 1181 BUSINESS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SHERIFF 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1454 1425 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 13 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1729 1755 CAPITAL PROJECTS SPECIALIST EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1591 1585 COMMUNITY OUTREACH COORDINATOR EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1579 1581 DATA ANALYST - F & R EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1466 1443 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-2036 DIVISIONAL LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 3 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1135 2305 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST EXE/COMP ECONOMIC SERVICES 2 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1737 1764 FACILITIES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GNT J-1404 1382 FINANCIAL ANALYST (GRANT)EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CP J-1387 1362 FINANCIAL ANALYST *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1740 1770 HOUSEKEEPING SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 SHA J-2030 2134 INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEMS/TECHNOLOGY COORDINATOREXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 SHA J-1151 1101 MANAGER OF CABLE ACCESS EXE/COMP RVTV 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1844 1897 MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1126 1091 PIO MANAGER EXE/COMP PIO 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1971 2079 PROGRAM COORDINATOR - CORTRAN EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-2041 2147 PUBLIC SERVICES LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GGF J-1973 2081 RESOURCE COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1480 1462 SYSTEMS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1484 1470 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 GNT J-1981 2089 UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (GRANT)EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C41 CAO J-1485 1471 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 53,925.36$ 70,777.11$ 87,628.85$ C42 CAO J-1454 1426 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 FEE J-1813 1864 CENTER MANAGER (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1275 1240 CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT EXE/COMP CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1054 1026 CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK TO BOS EXE/COMP BOS 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1201 1151 CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF THE REVENUE EXE/COMP COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1350 1320 CHIEF DEPUTY TREASURER EXE/COMP TREASURER 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CP J-1653 2377 CIVIL ENGINEER I *CP EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 ECC J-1457 1430 COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CMS J-1461 1435 COMMUNICATIONS SHOP SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CAO J-1466 1444 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1750 1781 DEPARTMENT SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1542 1544 DEPARTMENT SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP POLICE 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 RCA J-2154 2236 DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS EXE/COMP RCACP 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1966 FAMILY SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 6 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1402 1380 FINANCIAL SYSTEMS ANALYST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 FSF J-1738 1765 FLEET/GARAGE MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM C42 CAO J-1471 1449 GIS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 4 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1848 1901 PARKS ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1857 PARKS MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 2 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1392 1368 PAYROLL SPECIALIST EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1697 2332 PLANNER II EXE/COMP PLANNING 3 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1975 2083 SELF SUFFICIENCY SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CP J-1325 1297 SENIOR APPRAISER *CP EXE/COMP REAL ESTATE VALUATION 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GNT J-1404 1383 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I (GRANT)EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CP J-1387 1377 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1667 2398 SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER/CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1747 1777 SOLID WASTE MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1670 2403 STORMWATER OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CAO J-1480 1461 SYSTEMS ARCHITECT *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CAO J-1484 1469 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECT *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1880 1946 TOURISM/EVENT COORDINATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 GGF J-1700 2335 TRANSPORTATION PLANNER EXE/COMP PLANNING 2 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C42 CAO J-1485 1472 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,953.53$ 76,064.03$ 94,174.52$ C43 SHA J-1826 1876 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY PROJECT COORDINATOR EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-2025 2130 ADMINISTRATIVE LIBRARIAN - MATERIAL MANAGEMENT EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-2027 2132 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1952 2052 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1377 1352 BUDGET MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CAO J-1454 1427 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CP J-1653 2378 CIVIL ENGINEER II *CP EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GNT J-1960 2064 COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE ACT COORDINATOR (GRANT)EXE/COMP SOCIAL SERVICES 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1532 1531 CRIME ANALYST EXE/COMP POLICE 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CAO J-1467 1445 DATA SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1389 FINANCE MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CAO J-1471 1450 GIS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CAO J-1475 1456 NETWORK SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1865 RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 4 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-2042 2148 SENIOR BRANCH LIBRARIAN EXE/COMP LIBRARY 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GNT J-1404 1384 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II (GRANT)EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CP J-1387 1378 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 CAO J-1483 1468 TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C43 GGF J-1699 2334 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 61,981.70$ 81,350.94$ 100,720.18$ C44 GGF J-1381 1356 ACCOUNTING MANAGER EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1376 1351 BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1890 1957 CAPITAL PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 CAO J-1470 1448 ENTERPRISE SERVICES MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1736 1763 FACILITIES MANAGER EXE/COMP GENERAL SERVICES 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1104 1064 HR MANAGER EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 2 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM C44 GGF J-1003 1001 INTERNAL AUDITOR EXE/COMP ADMINISTRATION 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1858 1914 PARKS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MANAGER EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1859 1915 PARKS SUPERINTENDENT EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1698 2333 PRINCIPAL PLANNER EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1657 2384 PROJECT ENGINEER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1395 1371 PURCHASING DIVISION DIRECTOR EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 FEE J-1886 1954 RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT (FEE)EXE/COMP PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C44 GGF J-1701 2336 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C45 GGF J-1390 1366 FINANCE MANAGER - SYSTEMS EXE/COMP FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C45 GGF J-1107 1067 HR MANAGER/SYSTEMS EXE/COMP HUMAN RESOURCES 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C45 GGF J-1180 1125 SENIOR ASSISANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 6 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C45 GGF J-1669 2399 STORMWATER OPERATIONS MANAGER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C45 GGF J-1671 2400 STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C51 CAO J-1452 1422 APPLICATION SERVICES MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C51 CAO J-1472 1451 GIS MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C51 CAO J-1473 1454 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES MGR EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 67,025.87$ 87,971.41$ 108,916.95$ C52 GGF J-1176 1121 CHIEF ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ C52 GGF J-1693 2328 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR EXE/COMP PLANNING 1 73,074.02$ 95,909.70$ 118,745.39$ D61 SHA J-1150 1100 DIRECTOR OF CABLE ACCESS EXE/DISC RVTV 1 78,118.40$ 102,530.28$ 126,942.17$ D61 GGF J-1080 1044 SENIOR ASSISTANT COOUNTY ATTORNEY EXE/COMP COUNTY ATTORNEY 3 78,118.40$ 102,530.28$ 126,942.17$ D61 RCA J-2162 2242 VETERINARIAN EXE/COMP RCACP 1 78,118.40$ 102,530.28$ 126,942.17$ D62 GGF J-1131 2301 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXE/DISC ECONOMIC SERVICES 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1326 1291 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION EXE/DISC REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 ECC J-1486 1423 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR COMMUNICATIONS EXE/DISC COMMIT 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 CAO J-1453 1424 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR INFORMATION TECH EXE/DISC COMMIT 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1382 1357 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE EXE/DISC FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1100 1060 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HR EXE/DISC HUMAN RESOURCES 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-2028 2133 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES EXE/DISC LIBRARY 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1807 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1954 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES 2 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1125 1090 PIO OFFICER EXE/DISC PIO 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1651 2375 BUILDING COMMISSIONER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ D62 GGF J-1655 2381 COUNTY ENGINEER EXE/COMP DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 82,146.35$ 107,817.20$ 133,488.04$ E81 GGF J-2035 2140 DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES EXE/DISC LIBRARY 1 102,311.22$ 134,283.46$ 166,255.69$ E81 GGF J-1328 1293 DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION EXE/DISC REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 102,311.22$ 134,283.46$ 166,255.69$ E81 RCA J-2155 2237 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF RCACP EXE/DISC RCACP 1 102,311.22$ 134,283.46$ 166,255.69$ E82 CAO J-1468 1446 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYEXE/DISC COMMIT 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1650 2382 DIRECTOR OF DEV SERV EXE/DISC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1133 2303 DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXE/DISC ECONOMIC SERVICES 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1733 1760 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES EXE/DISC GENERAL SERVICES 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1102 1062 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES EXE/DISC HUMAN RESOURCES 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1819 1870 DIRECTOR OF PARKS, REC & TOURISM EXE/DISC PARKS, REC & TOURISM 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM E82 GGF J-1690 2327 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING EXE/DISC PLANNING 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E82 GGF J-1963 2067 DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES EXE/DISC SOCIAL SERVICES 1 106,339.40$ 139,570.38$ 172,801.36$ E83 GGF J-1578 1591 CHIEF OF FIRE AND RESCUE EXE/DISC FIRE & RESCUE 1 110,367.35$ 144,857.19$ 179,347.02$ E83 GGF J-1529 1529 CHIEF OF POLICE EXE/DISC POLICE 1 110,367.35$ 144,857.19$ 179,347.02$ E83 GGF J-1386 1361 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES EXE/DISC FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 1 110,367.35$ 144,857.19$ 179,347.02$ F101 GGF J-1001 1004 ASST COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EXE/DISC ADMINISTRATION 1 126,504.05$ 166,036.64$ 205,569.22$ F103 GGF J-1007 1007 DEPUTY COUNY ADMINISTRATOR EXE/DISC ADMINISTRATION 1 134,560.39$ 176,610.47$ 218,660.55$ UNC GNT J-1403 1381 WORKER'S COMP REHAB WORKER (GRANT)NOEX FINANCE & MGMT SERVCS 2 UNC GGF J-2082 2208 REGISTRAR EXE/DISC REGISTRAR 1 UNC GGF J-1053 1030 BOARD OF SPVRS VICE CHAIRMAN BOS 1 UNC GGF J-1052 1029 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEMBER BOS 3 UNC GGF J-1051 1028 BOS CHAIRMAN BOS 1 UNC GGF J-1276 1241 CLRK OF CIR CT CLERK CIRCUIT COURT 1 UNC GGF J-1202 1152 COMMISIONER OF REVENUE COMMISSIONER REVENUE 1 UNC GGF J-1177 1122 COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY COMMWLTH ATTORNEY 1 UNC GGF J-1002 1006 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION 1 UNC GGF J-1077 1041 COUNTY ATTORNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 UNC GGF J-1244 1196 SHERIFF SHERIFF 1 UNC GGF J-1356 1326 TREASURER TREASURER 1 ECC J-1460 1433 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER I *CP NOEX COMMIT 23 ECC J-1460 1434 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER II *CP NOEX COMMIT ECC J-1465 1442 COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFCR NOEX COMMIT 8 ECC J-1462 1436 COMMUNICATIONS TEAM SUPERVISOR NOEX COMMIT 5 ECC J-1469 1447 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER EXE/COMP COMMIT 1 GGF J-1243 1203 DEPUTY SHERIFF - SERGEANT NOEX SHERIFF 15 GGF J-1236 1202 DEPUTY SHERIFF - LIEUTENANT NOEX SHERIFF 7 GGF J-1230 1198 DEPUTY SHERIFF *CP NOEX SHERIFF 55 GGF J-1577 1590 FIRE CAPTAIN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 29 GGF J-1586 1596 FIRE INSPECTOR NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 2 GGF J-1598 1607 FIRE INSPECTOR CAPTAIN NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 1 GGF J-1588 1597 FIRE LIEUTENANT NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 26 GNT J-1596 1602 FIREFIGHTER (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 15 GGF J-1585 1595 FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE 113 GGF J-1230 1199 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF J-1230 1205 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II* CP MEDICAL NOEX SHERIFF GGF J-1230 1200 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF III *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF J-1230 1201 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF IV *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF J-1585 1599 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GNT J-1596 1606 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GGF J-1585 1600 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GNT J-1596 1605 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GGF J-1540 1542 POLICE OFFICER - SGT NOEX POLICE 16 See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans DBM Fund JOB #POS #POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM GGF J-1531 1533 POLICE OFFICER - UNIFORM DIV *CP NOEX POLICE 114 GGF J-1531 1534 POLICE OFFICER II *CP NOEX POLICE GGF J-1531 1535 POLICE OFFICER III *CP NOEX POLICE GGF J-1531 1536 POLICE OFFICER IV *CP NOEX POLICE GGF J-1526 1526 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE EXE/DISC POLICE 2 GGF J-1580 1592 DEPUTY CHIEF EXE/DISC FIRE & RESCUE 2 GGF J-1237 1190 DEPUTY SHERIFF - LT COLONEL EXE/DISC SHERIFF 2 GGF J-1227 1182 DEPUTY SHERIFF - CAPTAIN EXE/DISC SHERIFF 3 GGF J-1575 1589 BATTALION CHIEF EXE/COMP FIRE & RESCUE 8 GGF J-1530 1530 POLICE OFFICER - COMMANDER EXE/COMP POLICE 9 See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans See Step Plans AMENDMENTGRADE BAND DBM JOB #POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM (DBM)MARKET TARGET MAXIMUM (DBM)FUND 12 B B21 J-1206 1156 TAX CLERK I *CP NOEX COMM OF REV 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 14 B B22 J-1206 1157 TAX CLERK II *CP NOEX COMM OF REV 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 16 B B23 J-1206 1158 TAX CLERK III *CP NOEX COMM OF REV 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF 18 B B22 J-1460 1433 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER I *CP NOEX COMMIT 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ ECC 19 B B23 J-1460 1434 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER II *CP NOEX COMMIT 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ ECC 20 B J-1481 1467 TECHNNOLOGY SUPPORT TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX COMMIT 22 B B23 J-1481 1463 TECHNICAL ANALYST I *CP NOEX COMMIT 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF 24 B B24 J-1481 1464 TECHNICAL ANALYST II *CP NOEX COMMIT 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 26 B B25 J-1481 1465 TECHNICAL ANALYST III *CP NOEX COMMIT 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ GGF 22 B B23 J-1487 1473 TECHNICAL ANALYST I (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ ECC 24 B B24 J-1487 1474 TECHNICAL ANALYST II (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ ECC 26 B B25 J-1487 1475 TECHNICAL ANALYST III (ECC)NOEX COMMIT 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ ECC 2122-06 24 B B24 J-1471 1452 GIS SPECIALIST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ CAO 2122-06 26 C C41 J-1471 1453 GIS SPECIALIST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 27 C C42 J-1471 1449 GIS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 29 C C43 J-1471 1450 GIS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 61,982$ 77,477$ 100,720$ CAO 27 C C41 J-1484 1470 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 28 C C42 J-1484 1469 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECT *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 27 C C41 J-1454 1425 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 28 C C42 J-1454 1426 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 29 C C43 J-1454 1427 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 61,982$ 77,477$ 100,720$ CAO 27 C C41 J-1485 1471 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 28 C C42 J-1485 1472 WEB SYSTEMS ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 28 C C41 J-1466 1443 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST I *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 29 C C42 J-1466 1444 DATA INTEGRATION SPECIALIST II *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 27 C C41 J-1480 1462 SYSTEMS ENGINEER *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ CAO 28 C C42 J-1480 1461 SYSTEMS ARCHITECT *CP EXE/COMP COMMIT 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ CAO 13 B B21 J-1661 2388 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX DEV SERV 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 15 B B22 J-1661 2401 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX DEV SERV 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 16 B B21 J-1664 2392 PERMIT TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX DEV SERV 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 17 B B22 J-1664 2393 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX DEV SERV 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 18 B B23 J-1664 2394 PERMIT TECHNICIAN III *CP NOEX DEV SERV 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF CLASSIFICATION PLAN FY 2022-2023 CAREER PATHS 1 4 4 5 1 4 1 13 1 3 5 23 AMENDMENTGRADE BAND DBM JOB #POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM (DBM)MARKET TARGET MAXIMUM (DBM)FUND 19 B B23 J-1654 2380 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEV SERV 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF 21 B B24 J-1654 2379 COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE IN NOEX DEV SERV 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 23 B B25 J-1654 2397 SENIOR COMBINATION CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR *CP NOEX DEV SERV 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ GGF 21 B B23 J-1674 2405 STORMWATER INSPECTOR I *CP NOEX DEV SERV 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF 23 B B24 J-1674 2406 STORMWATER INSPECTOR II *CP NOEX DEV SERV 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 25 B B25 J-1674 2407 STORMWATER INSPECTOR III *CP NOEX DEV SERV 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ GGF 26 C C42 J-1653 2377 CIVIL ENGINEER I *CP EXE/COMP DEV SERV 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ GGF 29 C C43 J-1653 2378 CIVIL ENGINEER II *CP EXE/COMP DEV SERV 61,982$ 77,477$ 100,720$ GGF 17 B B24 J-1393 1369 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 19 B B25 J-1393 1385 SENIOR PAYROLL TECHNICIAN *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ GGF 21 B B24 J-1383 1358 BUYER *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 23 B B25 J-1383 1376 SENIOR BUYER *CP NOEX FIN&MGMT SERV 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ GGF 25 C C41 J-1387 1362 FINANCIAL ANALYST *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ GGF 26 C C42 J-1387 1377 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ GGF 27 C C43 J-1387 1378 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II *CP EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 61,982$ 77,477$ 100,720$ GGF 25 C C41 J-1404 1382 FINANCIAL ANALYST (GRANT)EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ GNT 26 C C42 J-1404 1383 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST I (GRANT)EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ GNT 27 C C43 J-1404 1384 SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST II (GRANT)EXE/COMP FIN&MGMT SERV 61,982$ 77,477$ 100,720$ GNT 20 FR STEP J-1585 1595 FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GGF 23 FR STEP J-1585 1600 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GGF 24 FR STEP J-1585 1599 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GGF 20 FR STEP J-1596 1602 FIREFIGHTER (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GNT 23 FR STEP J-1596 1605 PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GNT 24 FR STEP J-1596 1606 MASTER PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER *CP (GRANT)NOEX FIRE & RESCUE GNT 16 B B22 J-1739 1767 FLEET MECHANIC I *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ FSF 18 B B23 J-1739 1766 FLEET MECHANIC II *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ FSF 20 B B24 J-1739 1768 FLEET MECHANIC III *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ FSF 22 B B25 J-1739 1769 FLEET MECHANIC IV *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 53,158$ 61,102$ 76,377$ FSF 18 B B22 J-1727 1752 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH I *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 19 B B23 J-1727 1753 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH II *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 41,095$ 47,236$ 59,045$ GGF 2122-08 12 B B21 J-1841 1910 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 13 B B21 J-1841 1891 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 15 B B22 J-1841 1893 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *CP NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 2122-08 12 B B21 J-1842 1911 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER (SCHOOL)NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ SCH 5 8 13 4 3 2 1 113 7 5 2 15 3 AMENDMENTGRADE BAND DBM JOB #POS # POSITION STATUS DEPARTMENT NO. EMP MINIMUM (DBM)MARKET TARGET MAXIMUM (DBM)FUND 13 B B21 J-1842 1892 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I (SCHOOL)NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ SCH 15 B B22 J-1842 1894 MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II (SCHOOL)NOEX PRT/GEN SVC 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ SCH 14 B B21 J-1536 1540 RECORDS TECHNICIAN I *CP NOEX POLICE 32,334$ 37,166$ 46,457$ GGF 16 B B22 J-1536 1538 RECORDS TECHNICIAN II *CP NOEX POLICE 36,715$ 42,201$ 52,751$ GGF 20 PD S J-1531 1533 POLICE OFFICER UNIFORM DIV *CP NOEX POLICE GGF 22 PD S J-1531 1534 POLICE OFFICER II *CP NOEX POLICE GGF 23 PD S J-1531 1535 POLICE OFFICER III *CP NOEX POLICE GGF 24 PD S J-1531 1536 POLICE OFFICER IV *CP NOEX POLICE GGF 2122-07 22 B B31 J-1325 1290 APPRAISER I *CP EXE/COMP REAL EST VAL 46,581$ 53,541$ 66,926$ GGF 2122-07 24 C C41 J-1325 1300 APPRAISER II *CP EXE/COMP REAL EST VAL 53,925$ 67,407$ 87,629$ 26 C C42 J-1325 1297 SENIOR APPRAISER *CP EXE/COMP REAL EST VAL 57,954$ 72,442$ 94,175$ GGF 20 SHRF S J-1230 1198 DEPUTY SHERIFF *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF 22 SHRF S J-1230 1199 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF 22 SHRF S J-1230 1205 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF II* CP MEDICAL NOEX SHERIFF GGF 23 SHRF S J-1230 1200 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF III *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF 24 SHRF S J-1230 1201 MASTER DEPUTY SHERIFF IV *CP NOEX SHERIFF GGF 4 55 6 #N/A 7 Attachment C Pay Bands DBM Min Midpoint Max Min Midpoint Max A13 $13.4329 $16.3666 $19.3002 $27,940 $34,042 $40,144 B21 $15.5453 $18.9402 $22.3352 $32,334 $39,396 $46,457 B22 $17.6513 $21.5062 $25.3611 $36,715 $44,733 $52,751 B23 $19.7573 $24.0722 $28.3870 $41,095 $50,070 $59,045 B24 $22.3946 $27.2854 $32.1762 $46,581 $56,754 $66,926 B25 $25.5569 $31.1383 $36.7197 $53,158 $64,768 $76,377 B31 $22.3946 $27.2854 $32.1762 $46,581 $56,754 $66,926 B32 $25.5569 $31.1383 $36.7197 $53,158 $64,768 $76,377 C41 $25.9257 $34.0275 $42.1293 $53,925 $70,777 $87,629 C42 $27.8623 $36.5693 $45.2762 $57,954 $76,064 $94,175 C43 $29.7989 $39.1110 $48.4232 $61,982 $81,351 $100,720 C44 $32.2240 $42.2940 $52.3639 $67,026 $87,971 $108,917 C45 $35.1317 $46.1104 $57.0891 $73,074 $95,910 $118,745 C51 $32.2240 $42.2940 $52.3639 $67,026 $87,971 $108,917 C52 $35.1317 $46.1104 $57.0891 $73,074 $95,910 $118,745 D61 $37.5569 $49.2934 $61.0299 $78,118 $102,530 $126,942 D62 $39.4934 $51.8352 $64.1769 $82,146 $107,817 $133,488 D63 $41.4301 $54.3770 $67.3239 $86,175 $113,104 $140,034 E81 $49.1881 $64.5594 $79.9306 $102,311 $134,283 $166,256 E82 $51.1247 $67.1012 $83.0776 $106,339 $139,570 $172,801 E83 $53.0612 $69.6429 $86.2245 $110,367 $144,857 $179,347 F101 $60.8193 $79.8253 $98.8314 $126,504 $166,037 $205,569 F103 $64.6925 $84.9089 $105.1253 $134,560 $176,610 $218,661 HOURLY ANNUAL Attachment C: DBM Pay Bands Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance dissolving a lease with Blue Mountain Huts, LLC to provide camping accommodations in Explore Park SUBMITTED BY: Doug Blount Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Blue Mountain Huts, LLC has requested to dissolve the lease agreemen t with Roanoke County to provide recreation services at Explore Park BACKGROUND: In 2016 the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved the Adventure Plan for Explore Park, which outlined the direction for the park's development. As a part of the Adventure Plan and Business Plan for Explore Park, it outlined the public -private partnerships that were necessary for the park to develop into a destination facility. One of the services identified in the Adventure Plan was providing equestrian services. Roanoke County issued Request for Proposal 2017-097: Programs for Explore Park on March 22, 2017, and proposals were due on May 17, 2017. Roanoke County received one proposal to provide primitive camping, retail and rental equipment from Blue Mountain Huts, LLC. On January 23, 2018, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a land lease with Blue Mountain Huts, LLC to operate recreation services for primitive camping, retail and rental equipment. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 Blue Mountain Huts, LLC has requested to dissolve the lease with Roanoke County to provide camping, retail and rental services at Explore Park. Blue Mountain has decided to close their business. Parks, Recreation and Tourism will offer primitive camping and retail services at Explore Park for the 2022 operating season. Currently, the Blue Ridge Parkway Visitor Center offers a camp store as a part of its gift shop operation. In addition, an online reservation system for camping will be launched in April. The Visitor Center staff currently check campers in and provide welcome packets as part of their services so there will be no change to our customer service operations. Campsites will start at $25 per night for 2022 season. A variety of camping experiences will be offered with small and medium sized campsites, raised platforms and group camping sites. There have been no changes since the first reading of the ordinance on April 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact by dissolving the lease. The revenue generated from camping rentals will fund the maintenance of the camp sites. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE DISSOLVING A LEASE WITH BLUE MOUNTAIN HUTS, LLC TO PROVIDE CAMPING ACCOMMODATIONS IN EXPLORE PARK WHEREAS, the County is the Lessee of a ninety-nine year lease for Explore Park, property owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (“VRFA”), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Department of Parks, Recreation & Tourism (“PRT”) has devised a master plan (“Adventure Plan”) for the land leased by the County in Explore Park to achieve the purpose of the County / VRFA Lease; and WHEREAS, the County has solicited and negotiated contracts with various vendors for ground leases and event contracts to implement the Adventure Plan ; and WHEREAS, Blue Mountain Huts, Inc. (“Blue Mountain”), was the responsive bidder for the County’s RFP for, among other things, providing camping accommodations and associated services for visitors to Explore Park; and WHEREAS, the County entered into a ground lease agreement (“lease”) with Blue Mountain; and WHEREAS, due to various market factors, Blue Mountain avers that it is in their best interests to dissolve their current business; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County will continue to provide camping accommodations and associated services on the site leased to Blue Mountain and such uses are consistent with the Adventure Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 2 of 2 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01 and 2.03 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the County is authorized to acquire property, including the lease of real estate; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real estate shall be accomplished by ordinance, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022. 3. That the current Agreement with Blue Mountain for certain parcels of land in Explore Park is hereby dissolved. 4. That the lease term shall end May 10, 2022. 5. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of the Board of Supervisors in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the dissolution of this Lease Agreement, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance increasing the technology fee assessed on transactions processed by the Roanoke County Departments of Planning and Zoning and Development Services SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Amend Ordinance 052218-8, which established the technology fee of three percent (3%) on all permit issuing fees on March 22, 2018. BACKGROUND: Ordinance 052218-8 established a three percent (3%) “technology fee” on all permit issuing fees (which fees were imposed upon every transaction processed by the departments that are today known as the Departments of Planning, Zoning and Development Services), which fees are used to partially cover the costs of the County’s computer programming and equipment used to process applications and proj ects on May 22, 2018. DISCUSSION: The technology fee was established to recover costs associated with the issuing of permits by the Departments of Planning, Zoning and Development services. As costs related to technology and other operating expenses have increased since the fee was established, increasing the fee from three to five percent (3% to 5%) is prudent. Revenues generated from this fee are used to update and improve technology used by these. Page 2 of 2 There have been no changes since the first reading of this ordinance on April 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Annual impact of this fee change is estimated at approximately $27,000 of additional revenue and has been included in the fiscal year 2022 -2023 proposed operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this ordinance along with changes to other fees and adoption of the annual Fee Compendium. Page 1 of 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 ORDINANCE 052218-8 IMPOSING OR INCREASING CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND INSPECTIONS, PLANNING AND ZONING, AND REPEALING PRIOR ACTIONS CONCERNING SAME WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear the cost thereof while eliminating unintentional general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2241. A (9) of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, authorizes localities to impose reasonable fees and charges for the review of plats and plans and the inspection of facilities; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2286 A (6) of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, authorizes the collection of fees to cover the costs of making inspections, issuing permits, advertising of notices and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance or to the filing or processing of any appeal or amendment thereto; and WHEREAS, in 1990, by Ordinance 61290-6, the Board established certain fees for public services provided by and through the Roanoke County Department of Development and Inspections (which is now the Department of Community Development) relating to development services rendered for and on behalf of citizens; and WHEREAS, since 1990, such fees have remained the same; they have not increased in response to increases in the County’s costs to provide such services; and WHEREAS, other miscellaneous fees related to services provided by the Department of Community Development are set forth in the Roanoke County Code; and Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development recommends that the following fees that have previously been approved by this Board be increased: 1. Erosion and sediment control fees, 2. Site plan review fees, 3. Large subdivision review fees, 4. Certificate of occupancy fees for commercial or residential planned unit development, and 5. Special use permit fee; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development further recommends the imposition of the following new fees: 1. Certificate of occupancy fee for residential development, 2. Permit renewal fee (for erosion and sediment control, commercial site plan and/ or large subdivision development): this renewal fee will be imposed upon the second renewal of the permit and for each subsequent annual renewal; there will be no fee for the first twelve (12) month renewal of a permit, and 3. Zoning verification fee: this fee will cover the cost of preparing a zoning verification letter (a document that informs property owners, lenders, and prospective buyers of zoning laws related to a particular property based on the County’s current zoning ordinance and past history of the site), 4. Commonwealth Building Code Academy fee: pursuant to Sections 36-137(7) and 36-105 of the Code of Virginia, (in which the Commonwealth of Virginia imposes a levy of 2% of permit fees collected by the County to support training programs of the Building Code Academy), the Department of Community Development further proposes to impose an additional 2% fee on the issuance of all building, Page 3 of 6 plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits (for remittance to the Commonwealth). The County has been paying this levy to the Commonwealth, but has not been collecting it from its applicants (which has decreased the funds available to the County to cover costs), and 5. Technology fee: pursuant to Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia, it is proposed that an additional technology fee in the amount of 3% (of all permit issuing fees), be imposed upon every transaction processed by the Roanoke County Department of Community Development (which may include County development services and County planning and zoning services), related to applications for development, rezoning, construction, etc. The fees collected will be used to partially cover costs of County’s computer programming and equipment used to process applications and projects; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-107 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, directs the advertising, public hearing, and enactment of certain fees and levies, said requirements having been satisfied as required by law; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on May 8, 2018, and the second reading was held on May 22, 2018. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. That Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Sediment Control), Section 8.1-8(c) of the County Code is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: Section 8.1-8. - Permits; fees; surety; etc. (c) Fees. An applicant requesting permission to begin land-disturbing activity pursuant to this article shall pay the following fees to cover the administrative expense of review, permitting, and inspection. Page 4 of 6 Disturbed Area (Square Feet) Fee or portion of an acre $350.00 + $75.00 per disturbed acre 2. That the Chapter 7 (Building Regulations), Section 7-73 of the County Code is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: Section 7-73 Miscellaneous fees There is hereby established the following schedule of miscellaneous fees: Reinspection on construction: $50.00 (applies on third re-inspection of same item) Certificate of occupancy: Commercial: $25.00 $50.00 Temporary—single-family: $10.00 Temporary—commercial: $25.00 Existing building CO: $35.00 Elevator periodic inspection: $35.00 Amusement devices: Kiddie rides: $15.00 Circular rides or flat rides that can be inspected from less than 20 feet above ground: $25.00 All other types of devices: $45.00 Page 5 of 6 Amusement device fees reduced fifty (50) percent when a private inspector is used. 3. That there are hereby established certain fees for public services provided by and through the Roanoke County Department of Community Development: Review site plans acre + the Virginia storm-water management permit fee (hereafter Review large subdivisions Application for special use permit Issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residential building $25 annual permits renewal of a permit. Zoning verification fee Building Code Academy fee remittance to the Commonwealth) 2% fee on all permit issuing fees (to be imposed upon every transaction processed by the Roanoke County Department of Community Development (which may in Technology fee D 4. To the extent that provisions of any prior ordinances of the County are in conflict with this ordinance, the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are superseded and repealed. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance and for the imposition of the fees and charges contained herein shall be July 1, 2018. On motion of Supervisor Peters to adopt the ordinance, seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors North, McNamara, Peters, Hooker NAYS: Supervisor Assaid cc: Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Page 6of6 e Board of Supervisors Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE INCREASING THE TECHNOLOGY FEE ASSESSED ON TRANSACTIONS PROCESSED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING AND ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear the cost thereof while eliminating unintentional general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2286(A)(6) of the Code of Virginia authorizes the collection of fees to cover the costs of issuing permits, and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, in 1990, by Ordinance 61290-6, the Board established certain fees for public services provided by and through the Roanoke County Department of Development and Inspections (which is now comprised of the Departments of Planning and Zoning and Development Services); and WHEREAS, in 2018, by Ordinance 052218 -8, and pursuant to Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia, the Board updated the schedule of fees and imposed a 3% “technology fee” on all permit issuing fees (which fees were imposed upon every transaction processed by the departments that are today known as the Departments of Planning and Zoning and Development Services), which fees are used to partially cover the costs of the County’s computer programming and equipment used to process applications and projects; and WHEREAS, it has been proposed that due to increased technology costs incurred by the County, that the technology fee be increased to 5% of all permit issuing fees; and Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: 1. That a technology fee of 5% shall be imposed on all permit issuing fees (to be imposed upon every transaction processed by the Roanoke County Departments of Development Services and Planning and Zoning), related to applications for development, rezoning, construction, etc. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately. 2. That this ordinance shall become effective on July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 2 (Administration), Article 1 (In General), Section 2-5 (Library fines and fees) of the Roanoke County Code SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Amend Section 2-5 (Library fines and fees) of the Roanoke County Code in order to eliminate library late-fee fines. BACKGROUND: Ordinance 052510-12 which was adopted on May 25, 2010 amended the Code of Roanoke County, Virginia Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 2 -5 to set fees for overdue fines for library items including books and video materials. This ordinance also set fines and fees for lost and damaged items. DISCUSSION: After study and consideration of a local and national trend to eliminate library late -fee fines, library staff has shared data that suggest that the elimination of library late -fee fines will lead to a higher rate of returned items. Overdue fees can serve as a barrier to library resources as vulnerable populations, including children, who have limited acce ss to the internet, digital devices, and transportation are most at risk of accruing late fees. There have been no changes since the first reading on April 26, 2022. Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The Roanoke Valley Library Consortium has suspended the collection of la te fee fines since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March of 2022 and revenues related to these late fee fines were reduced. Based on trends, fiscal impact is minimal. Based on research of other library systems, replacement costs for lost items may d ecrease as an increase in return of items deemed lost should increase. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends eliminating library late-fee fines. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 (ADMINISTRATION), ARTICLE 1 (IN GENERAL), SECTION 2-5 (LIBRARY FINES AND FEES) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, after study and consideration of a local and national trend to eliminate library late-fee fines, library staff has shared data that suggest that the elimination of library late-fee fines will lead to a higher rate of returned items; accordingly, it is proposed that library late-fee fines be discontinued; and WHEREAS, insofar as such fines are codified in Chapter 2 (Administration), Article 1 (In General), Section 2-5 (Library fines and fees) of the Roanoke County Code, it is proposed that Section 2-5 be amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: 1. That Chapter 2 (Administration), Article I (In General), Section 2-5 (Library fines and fees) of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows (all portions of Section 2-5 not specifically amended or deleted below shall remain without amendment): Sec. 2-5. – Library fines and fees. There is hereby established the following schedule of fines and fees for overdue, damaged or lost public library items or materials: Overdue Fines Adult or children’s books or materials, per day …… $0.20 Page 2 of 2 Video materials, per day …… 1.00 Items specifically designated as in-demand, per day …… 1.00 Maximum fine per item …… 5.00 Maximum fine per item for children’s book or material …… 1.00 2. That this ordinance shall be effective on July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 7 (Building Regulations), Article V (Fees), Sections 7-73 (Miscellaneous Fees) and 7- 75 (Fee for Cross Connection Inspection) of the Roanoke County Code SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Amendment of Sections 7-73 and 7-75 to increase certain inspection fees BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Section 15.2-2286(A)(6) of the Code of Virginia authorizes the collection of fees to cover the costs of issuing permits, and other expenses incident to the admin istration of a zoning ordinance. Section 15.2-2241(A)(9) of the Code of Virginia authorizes localities to impose reasonable fees and charges for the review of plats and plans and the inspection of facilities. In 2004, the Board adopted Ordinance 092804 -7 which, inter alia, amended section 7- 73. Miscellaneous fees of the Roanoke County Code. Section 7-75, which sets the fee for cross connection inspections, has not been amended since 1988. It is proposed that Sections 7-73 and 7-75 be amended to more fully recover costs incurred by the County in providing such services. Page 2 of 2 Specifically, it is proposed that the fee for the inspection of kiddie rides be increased from $15 to $30; the fee for the inspection of circular rides be increased from $25 to $45; and the fee for inspection of all other amusement devices be increased from $45 to $50. It is further proposed that the fee for inspection of a cross connection (any physical connection of arrangement between two otherwise separate piping systems) be increased from $30 to $40. There have been no changes since the first reading held on April 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact is estimated to be $10,000 in additional revenue from increasing these fees and has been included in the fiscal year 2022-2023 proposed operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 (BUILDING REGULATIONS), ARTICLE V (FEES), SECTIONS 7-73 (MISCELLANEOUS FEES) AND 7- 75 (FEE FOR CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2286(A)(6) of the Code of Virginia authorizes the collection of fees to cover the costs of issuing permits, and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2241(A)(9) of the Code of Virginia authorizes localities to impose reasonable fees and charges for the review of plats and plans and the inspection of facilities; and WHEREAS, in 2004, the Board adopted Ordinance 092804-7 which, inter alia, amended section 7-73. Miscellaneous fees of the Roanoke County Code; and WHEREAS, Section 7-75, which sets the fee for cross connection inspections, has not been amended since 1988; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that Sections 7-73 and 7-75 be amended to more fully recover costs incurred by the County in providing such services; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2022, and the second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on May 10, 2022. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: 1. That Chapter 7 (Building Regulations), Article V (Fees), Sections 7-73 (Miscellaneous fees) and 7-75 (Fee for cross connection) of the Roanoke County Page 2 of 2 Code are hereby amended as follows (all portions of Sections 7-73 and 7-75 not specifically amended or deleted below shall remain without amendment): Sec. 7-73. – Miscellaneous fees. There is hereby established the following schedule of miscellaneous fees: Amusement devices: Kiddie rides: $15.00$35.00 Circular rides that can be inspected from less than 20 feet above ground: $25.00$45.00 All other types of devices: $45.00$50.00 Sec. 7-75.- Fee for cross connection inspection. Effective January 26, 1988July 1, 2022, a fee of thirty forty dollars ($30.00$40.00) for each cross connection inspection shall be imposed. 2. That this ordinance shall become effective on July 1, 2022. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 4038, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane, Catawba Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance to rezone property from low density residential to industrial. BACKGROUND: · Rezoning request involves four (4) parcels - two (2) entire parcels and portions of two (2) parcels - totaling 3.145 acres. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning application on April 5, 2022. One citizen spoke during the public hearing. Her concerns inclu ded: the types of uses proposed; noise; hours of operation; buffers; lighting; and property values. The Planning Discussion discussed proposed uses, access, noise; construction phasing and schedule if approved; buffers; hours of operation; lighting; surro unding uses; and the future land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District. Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance rezoning 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton Request: Rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District 43.00-0000), 4056 Crossmill Lane (TM# 055.03-03-42.00-0000), and 4066 Crossmill Lane (TM# 055.03-03-41.00-0000) Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton are petitioning to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane in the Catawba Magisterial District. 4038 and 0 Crossmill Lane are owned by Ronald and Trina Moran, while 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane are owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton. The entirety of 4038 and 0 Crossmill Lane are proposed to be rezoned from R-1 to I-1, as well as a 0.62-acre portion of 4056 Crossmill Lane and a 0.565-acre portion of 4066 Crossmill Lane. The 3.145 acres included in the petition would be split into two new lots, a 1.77-acre lot that would be owned by Ronald and Trina Moran and a 1.375-acre lot that would be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton. On the 1.77- acre lot, Mr. Moran is proposing to construct a 13,500 square foot building, and on the 1.375-acre lot, Mr. Boynton is proposing to construct a 6,000 square foot building. In these two new buildings, Mr. Moran and Mr. Boynton would operate industrial uses that are allowed in the I-1 zoning district and conform with all relevant use and design standards. The remaining 0.775 acres of 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane that are not included in the petition will remain zoned R-1 and two new residential parcels that would be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton are proposed to be created: one parcel of 0.43 acre and one parcel of 0.345 acre. The existing single-family dwellings on 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane would remain on these two new parcels. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan (as amended by the 2012 Glenvar Community Plan) indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Glenvar Village, a future land use area for the Glenvar community that calls for a mix of uses along the West Main Street Corridor. Limited industrial uses are encouraged within the Glenvar Village future land use area, and these limited industrial uses are encouraged to be clustered. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Glenvar Village land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-61-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance states that: “The purpose of the I-1, low intensity industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service area which are suitable for less intensive industrial activities. These areas are primarily designated based on the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from flooding, as well as the rail and airport facilities or the interstate highway system. This district generally coincides with the recommendations for the principal industrial land use category contained in the comprehensive plan, and particularly those areas unsuitable for more intensive or potentially hazardous industrial uses. Distributing these areas around the county in a planned manner to create employment centers within close proximity to residential growth areas and reduce heavy traffic generation of industrial uses is encouraged.” The industrial uses allowed by right in the I-1 zoning district are: Custom Manufacturing; Industry, Type I; Landfill, Rubble; Recycling Centers and Stations; Transportation Terminal; Truck Terminal; and Warehousing and Distribution. Of these uses, Custom Manufacturing, Landfill, Rubble, and Recycling Centers and Stations are subject to additional use and design standards. Construction of the two new industrial buildings will require site plan review(s) and commercial building permit review(s). 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – The four parcels included in the petition - 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane – are each 0.98 acres in size. There is an existing single-family dwelling, built in 1892, and a small storage shed on 4038 Crossmill Lane, both of which would be demolished if the proposed rezoning is approved. 0 Crossmill Lane is vacant. There is an existing single-family dwelling, built in 1948, a detached garage, and a small storage shed on 4056 Crossmill Lane. The existing storage shed and detached garage would be demolished if the proposed rezoning is approved. The existing single-family dwelling will remain, as it is not in the area that is proposed to be rezoned. There is an existing single-family dwelling, built in 1978, and a small storage shed on 4066 Crossmill Lane. The existing single-family dwelling and storage shed will remain even if the proposed rezoning is approved, as they are not in the area that is proposed to be rezoned. slopes up to the north towards Interstate 81. Elevations on these two parcels range from 1,091 feet in the southeast corner of 4038 Crossmill Lane to 1,097 feet in the northwest corner of 0 Crossmill Lane. The hill begins in earnest on the eastern (front) half of 4056 Crossmill Lane, though the western (rear) half of the parcel – the portion that is proposed to be rezoned - is still mostly flat. Elevations on 4056 Crossmill Lane range from 1,095 feet along the southern property line with 0 Crossmill Lane to 1,104 feet in the northeast corner of the parcel. The hill steepens on 4066 Crossmill Lane, and elevations on this parcel range from 1,099 feet in the southwest corner of the parcel to 1,119 feet along a small portion of the northern property line with 4076 Crossmill Lane. 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane consist entirely of open field, save for most of the western half of 4038, which has been surfaced with gravel and is used as a parking area for the adjacent industrial uses. The western (rear) half of 4066 Crossmill Lane – the portion that is proposed to be rezoned - was formerly wooded but was recently cleared of trees. (across Crossmill Lane) by parcels zoned I-1. The parcels immediately adjacent to the west (4123 and 4125 West Main Street) are owned by Ronald and Trina Moran and house buildings and uses similar to the ones proposed for the parcels included in the petition. To the north of 4066 Crossmill Lane (the northernmost parcel included in the petition) are four more parcels zoned R-1, and to the north of these parcels is Interstate 81. Generally, the surrounding neighborhood (south of Interstate 81) is composed almost entirely of industrial and commercial uses. The vast majority of the parcels in the surrounding neighborhood are zoned I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, I-2, High Intensity Industrial District, or C-2, High Intensity 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture – If the proposed rezoning is approved, the 3.145 acres included in the petition will be split into two new lots, a 1.77-acre lot that would be owned by Ronald and Trina Moran (“Proposed Lot A” on the Concept Plan dated February 18, 2022 prepared by Balzer & Associates), and a 1.375-acre lot that would be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton (“Proposed Lot B” on the Concept Plan). On Proposed Lot A, Mr. Moran is proposing to construct a 13,500 square foot building (“Proposed Building A” on the Concept Plan), and on Proposed Lot B, Mr. Boynton is proposing to construct a 6,000 square foot building (“Proposed Building B” on the Concept Plan). Proposed Buildings A and B would be similar in appearance and structure to the existing buildings on the lots immediately adjacent to the west that are owned by Ronald and Trina Moran (4123 and 4125 West Main Street). The uses proposed for Proposed Buildings A and B would be similar to the uses currently operated on 4123 and 4125 West Main Street, which would be allowed in the I-1 zoning district, and would conform with all relevant use and design standards. A 35-foot Type D Buffer Yard consisting of small evergreen trees, large deciduous trees, and a 6-foot-tall screening fence would be constructed to separate Proposed Lots A and B from the portions of 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane that are not included in the petition. Section 30-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, which outlines requirements for screening, landscaping, and buffer yards, is attached to the staff report. The 0.775 acre of 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane that are not included in the petition will remain zoned R-1 and two new residential parcels that would be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton are proposed to be created: one parcel of 0.43 acre and one parcel of 0.345 acre. The existing single-family dwellings on 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane would remain on these two new parcels. serve Proposed Building A. In addition, the existing 12,400-square foot (0.285 acre) gravel parking area on the western (rear) side of 4038 Crossmill Lane would be paved and expanded to approximately 30,000 square feet (0.689 acre) to serve Proposed Building A. The existing 17-foot-wide paved driveway on the western (rear) side of 4038 Crossmill Lane that currently serves as access to the existing gravel parking area from 4123 West Main Street would be repaved and expanded to 30 feet, and would provide direct access from 4123 West Main Street to the paved parking area that is proposed to serve Proposed Building A. A 20-foot-wide paved driveway would be constructed, straddling the property line of Proposed Lots A and B, to serve Proposed Building B. In addition, a 10,600 square foot paved parking area would be constructed on Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety – All construction on site will be required to meet the requirements of the applicable Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Engineering - Engineering has no comments. Specific design requirements and details will be addressed during normal site plan submittal and review process. services already provided. Fire flow and access requirements will have to be met for any new building. General Services – General Services does not see any issues and does not have comments. Parks, Recreation and Tourism - Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism has no comments on this land use application, as there are no foreseeable impacts to operations. Stormwater – No comments received. Roanoke County Transportation – After reviewing the Pedestrian Vision Plan, Greenway Plan, and Regional Bicycle Map it does not appear these properties are adjacent to any future projects related to these plans. The 2012 Glenvar Community Plan calls for improved pedestrian connectivity in the Glenvar community. Roanoke County staff have had numerous conversations with business owners in the West Main Street corridor who are concerned about the lack of transportation options for their employees who do not have access to a car. Roanoke County recently constructed a sidewalk on the south side of West Main Street between the City of Salem and Technology Drive and we are currently in the process of applying for funding to construct sidewalk on the north side of West Main Street. Please consider constructing sidewalk along the frontage of 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane, as sidewalk in this location could eventually connect to the planned sidewalk on the north side of West Main Street. VDOT – 1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of- way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections must be adhered to where applicable for commercial entrances. This includes but is not limited to commercial entrance spacing and intersection sight distance. The intersection sight distance must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3. A traffic impact analysis will be required to determine if there are any turn lane or taper warrants with this project. 4. The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. Western Virginia Water Authority - Fire flow for this use type has not been provided with this submittal. Roanoke Fire Marshall will set requirements and it is the responsibility of the developer to meet this requirement. Water and sewer extension should allow for future water and sewer extensions to Crossmill lane by providing public easements. Additional design comments will be provided at the time of plan submittal. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan (as amended by the 2012 Glenvar Community Plan) indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Glenvar Village, a future land use area that is calls for a mix of uses along the West Main Street Corridor, including community activity centers, commercial uses, general retail shops and personal services, limited industrial uses, mixed use developments, office and institutional uses, parks and outdoor recreation/ecotourism facilities, and residential uses. Limited industrial uses are encouraged to be clustered in the Glenvar Village future land use area. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Glenvar Village land use designation. In addition, one of the economic development goals of the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan is “[t]o create and maintain a marketable inventory of quality industrial/commercial real property sufficient to meet market demand.” By creating new industrial property, the proposed rezoning would help to implement this goal. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton are petitioning to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane, Catawba Magisterial District. The area that is proposed to be rezoned would be redrawn into two new lots: one 1.77-acre lot to be owned by Ronald and Trina Moran, and one 1.375-acre lot to be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton. The remaining 0.775 acre of 4056 and 4066 Crossmill Lane would retain R-1 zoning and would be redrawn into two new lots that would be owned by Michael and Shirley Boynton, one of 0.43 acre and one of 0.345 acre. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan (as amended by the 2012 Glenvar Community Plan) indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel as Glenvar Village, a future land use area for the Glenvar community that calls for a mix of uses along the West Main Street Corridor. Limited industrial uses are encouraged within the Glenvar Village future land use area, and these limited industrial uses are encouraged to be clustered. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Glenvar Village land use designation. CASE NUMBER: #3-4/2022 PREPARED BY: Isaac Henry HEARING DATES: PC: April 5, 2022 BOS: April 26, 2022 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs R-1 District Regulations I-1 District Regulations Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yard Regulations Glenvar Village Land Use Designation CROSSMILL LN PROPOSED BUILDING A 13,500 SF PROPOSED BUILDING B 6,000 SF PROPOSED LOT C ±18,750 SF PROPOSED LOT B ±1.40 AC PROPOSED LOT A ±1.67 AC PROPOSED LOT D ±15,000 SF PROJECT NO. REVISIONS SCALE DATE CHECKED BY DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY www.balzer.cc Roanoke / Richmond Shenandoah Valley New River Valley / Lynchburg P L A N N E R S / A R C H I T E C T S E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S J: \ 2 1 \ 0 0 \ 0 4 \ 0 4 2 1 0 0 6 3 . 0 0 C R O S S M I L L L A N E W A T E R & S E W E R E X T E N S I O N \ C I V I L \ d w g \ 0 4 2 1 0 0 6 3 . 0 0 B a s e 2 0 2 2 - 0 1 - 1 3 . d w g P L O T T E D : 2/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 3 : 1 0 : 3 0 P M 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772.9580 KAM CPB CPB 2/18/2022 1" = 30' CR O S S M I L L L A N E CO N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N 43 0 8 C R O S S M I L L L A N E SA L E M , V A 2 4 1 5 3 EX-A 04210063.00 PRE L I M I N A R Y Source: Es ri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earths tar Geograp hics , CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us er Community, Roanoke County, Va 2021, RoanokeCounty 0 140 28070 Feet Date: 2/22/2022 1:2,257 Aerial Map Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton 4038 Crossmill Ln, 0 Crossmill Ln, 4056 Crossmill Ln, 4066 Crossmill Ln, Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map:055.03-03-44.00-0000, 055.03-03-43.00-0000, 055.03-03-42.00-0000, 055.03-03-41.00-0000 Area to be rezoned: 3.145 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: I-1 Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Ro ano ke Co unty, Vriginia2019Ro ano ke Co unty, Vriginia2019 I1I1 R1R1 I2I2 I1SI1S C2C2 So urc e: Esri, Maxar, Geo Eye, Earthstar Geo graphic s, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,Aero GRID, IGN, and the GIS User Co mmunity, Ro ano ke Co unty, Va 2021, Ro ano keCo unty Ro ano ke Co unty, Virginia2019 1:2,257 Zoning C2 I1 I2 R1 Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Zoning Map Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton 4038 Crossmill Ln, 0 Crossmill Ln, 4056 Crossmill Ln, 4066 Crossmill Ln, Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map:055.03-03-44.00-0000,055.03-03-43.00-0000,055.03-03-42.00-0000,055.03-03-41.00-0000 Area to be rezoned: 3.145 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: I-1 Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site 0 140 28070 Feet GVGV NCNC So urc e: Esri, Maxar, Geo Eye, Earthstar Geo graphic s, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,Aero GRID, IGN, and the GIS User Co mmunity, Ro ano ke Co unty, Va 2021, Ro ano keCo unty Future Land Use Glenvar Village Neighbo rho o d Co nservatio n Ro ano ke Co unty, Vriginia2019 Future Land Use Map Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton 4038 Crossmill Ln, 0 Crossmill Ln, 4056 Crossmill Ln, 4066 Crossmill Ln, Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map:055.03-03-44.00-0000, 055.03-03-43.00-0000, 055.03-03-42.00-0000, 055.03-03-41.00-0000 Area to be rezoned: 3.145 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: I-1 Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site Date: 2/22/2022 1:2,257 Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 0 140 28070 Feet 3/10/22, 2:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 1/4 (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-41. - R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. - Purpose. The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low-middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private* Residential Uses Accessory Apartment* Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit* Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * 3/10/22, 2:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 2/4 3. 4. 5. (B) 1. 2. Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * Civic Uses Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * 3/10/22, 2:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 3/4 3. 4. (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses Golf Course * Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1 , § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-41-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 20,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. All lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 7,200 square feet. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: Principal structures: 10 feet. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: 3/10/22, 2:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 4/4 a. b. 4. (C) 1. a. b. (D) 1. 2. Principal structures: 25 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: Principal structures: 45 feet. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) 3/28/22, 9:38 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 1/5 (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-61. - I-1 LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-61-1. - Purpose. The purpose of the I-1, low intensity industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service area which are suitable for less intensive industrial activities. These areas are primarily designated based on the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from flooding, as well as the availability of adequate sewer and water capacity, access to arterial road network, and proximity to rail and airport facilities or the interstate highway system. This district generally coincides with the recommendations for the principal industrial land use category contained in the comprehensive plan, and particularly those areas unsuitable for more intensive or potentially hazardous industrial uses. Distributing these areas around the county in a planned manner to create employment centers within close proximity to residential growth areas and reduce heavy traffic generation of industrial uses is encouraged. Since land with suitable characteristics for less intensive industrial development is limited in the county, a high degree of protection is promoted where industrial development is located adjacent to existing or future residential areas. The conversion and/or redevelopment of existing non- conforming uses in this district which are unrelated to industrial needs is also encouraged. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-61-2. - Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture Agritourism * Civic Uses Administrative Services Day Care Center * Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Maintenance and Service Facilities 3/28/22, 9:38 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 2/5 3. 4. Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services Utility Services, Major * Utility Services, Minor Guidance Services Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Laboratories Medical Office Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Communication Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Equipment Sales and Rental * Garden Center * Laundry Personal Improvement Services Restaurant, General Retail Sales 3/28/22, 9:38 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 3/5 5. 6. (B) 1. Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Recycling Centers and Stations * Transportation Terminal Truck Terminal Warehousing and Distribution Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * Wind Energy System, Small * The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership * Automobile Rental/Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Gasoline Station * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini-warehouse * Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales 3/28/22, 9:38 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 4/5 2. 3. (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. (B) 1. 2. Truck Stop * Industrial Uses Composting * Construction Yards * Resource Extraction * Transfer Station * Miscellaneous Uses Aviation Facilities, Private * Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * Wind Energy System, Large * Wind Energy System, Utility * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042297, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 082807-18, § 1, 8-28-07; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 030811-1 , § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 091311-7 , § 1, 9-13-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord No. 092215-9 , § 1, 9- 22-15; Ord. No. 062816-4 , § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 062717-4 , § 1, 6-27-17; Ord. No. 072721-8 , § 1, 7-27-21) Sec. 30-61-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: Area: 15,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. Side yard: 3/28/22, 9:38 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 5/5 a. b. 3. a. b. 4. (C) 1. a. (D) 1. 2. Principal structures: 10 feet. Accessory structures: behind front building line and 3 feet from side line. Rear yard: Principal structures: 15 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: All structures: When adjoining property zoned residential, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required side and/or rear yard adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited. Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 9, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 1/9 (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) SEC. 30-92. - SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, AND BUFFER YARDS. Footnotes: --- (5) --- Editor's note— Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, adopted May 26, 2009, amended the Code by repealing former § 30-92. Former § 30-92 pertained to similar subject matter, and derived from Ord. No. 111301-10, adopted November 13, 2001; and Ord. No. 042208-16, adopted April 22, 2008. Sec. 30-92-1. - Intent. It is the intent of these provisions to: Set minimum standards that will ease the transition between zoning districts of different intensities. Provide visual and noise buffers between certain land uses and adjoining activities. Promote the protection of the natural environment through plantings that absorb gaseous emissions and improve air quality. Encourage the incorporation of existing vegetation into new developments. Encourage attractively landscaped areas in new developments. Improve the quality of the environment within the county and to provide a certain and predictable review and approval process for landscape plans by establishing minimum standards for planting in new developments. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01) Sec. 30-92-2. - Administration. These provisions and requirements shall apply to buildings and developments requiring a site development plan pursuant to section 30-90 of this ordinance. The board shall also have the authority to apply any of these requirements as a condition of a special use permit approved by the board. Landscaping required by this ordinance shall be planted during an opportune planting season, and shall be in place and in good condition prior to a final certificate of zoning compliance being issued for the site. The property owner in accordance with the existing landscape ordinance shall immediately replace landscaping which dies. After the issuance of a final certificate of zoning compliance for a site, it shall be the property owner(s) responsibility to maintain required screening, landscaping and buffer yards. Temporary irrigation must be provided to insure establishment. A description of the type of irrigation system used to establish the landscape is required to accompany the site plan. Irrigation systems are encouraged with landscape materials, which cannot survive on native precipitation. All plant material must meet American Association of Nurserymen Specifications for no. 1 grade. Native plantings are encouraged when compatible with the surrounding land use. Every effort should be made to incorporate healthy existing trees into the landscaping plan. For native plant listings refer to the department of conservation and recreation(s) publication entitled "Native Plants for Conservation, Restoration, and Landscaping-Western Virginia-Mountain Region." These regulations supplement screening, landscaping or buffer yard requirements for specific land uses as may be described in article IV, use and design standards. Where a conflict may exist between standards, the more stringent standard shall apply. Written decisions of the administrator regarding these provisions may be appealed to the board of zoning appeals pursuant to section 30-24 of this ordinance. Appeals shall be made within thirty (30) days of the 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 2/9 (F) (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) administrator(s written decision. The approval of a site development plan shall constitute a written decision of the administrator. Any required vegetation that has died must be replaced within thirty (30) days. If during an inopportune planting season, time will be expanded to within thirty (30) days after the start of the opportune planting season. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-92-3. - Modi cations. Screening, landscaping and buffer yards required by this section shall be applied equally to all similarly situated properties. Modifications to these standards may be granted in writing by the administrator if the administrator finds any of the following circumstances exist on the proposed building site, or surrounding properties: Natural land characteristics such as topography or existing vegetation on the proposed building site would achieve the same intent of this section; Innovative landscaping or architectural design is employed on the building site to achieve an equivalent screening or buffering effect. The required screening would be ineffective at maturity due to the proposed topography of the site, and/or the location of the improvements on the site. The topography of adjacent and surrounding sites is such as to render required screening ineffective at maturity. The size or character of the area or equipment to be screened is such that screening may be ineffective in carrying out the intention of this section. When the acreage of a site is significantly larger than the area proposed for physical improvements or active usage, buffer yards shall be reserved as required by the section. However, to achieve the intent of this section, the administrator may approve an alternative location and design for required screening and plantings. When property lines abut an adjacent jurisdiction, the administrator shall determine the specific screening and buffering requirements along that property line(s) after consideration of the zoning designation and/or land use of the adjacent property. Requirements shall not exceed those that would be required for similarly situated/zoned property within the county. When a site plan is submitted to modify or expand an existing building or site improvements, or accommodate a change in land use, buffer yard and screening requirements shall only be applied to those portions of the site that are directly affected by the proposed improvements, or change in land use, as determined by the administrator. The areas of any required buffer yard shall not be required to exceed fifteen (15) percent of the site proposed for development. In such cases, the administrator shall allow the width or location of certain buffer yards to be reduced or eliminated. The administrator shall require additional landscaping and/or screening within the remaining buffer yards, or elsewhere on the site. No landscaping or screening shall be required which in the opinion of the administrator interferes with traffic safety, or which violates the provisions of section 30-100-8 of this ordinance. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01) Sec. 30-92-4. - Enforcement Procedures and Penalties. 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 3/9 (A) (B) (A) 1. 2. 3. (B) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. All landscaping must be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance. In situations where a buildin structure, or property, must be occupied or used prior to completion of landscaping requirements, the county may temporary or partial certificate of zoning compliance. A bond in the amount of forty (40) percent of the total cost of landscaping shall be held until final zoning approval. Any violations shall be subject to section 30-22 of Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01) Sec. 30-92-4.1. - Reserved. Editor's note— Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, adopted November 12, 2013, amended the Code by repealing former § 30-92-4.1 in its entirety. Former § 30-92-4.1 pertained to landscaping provisions in the Clearbrook village overlay district, and derived from Ord. No. 121900-11, adopted December 19, 2000. Similar provisions can now be found in § 30-92-5.1. Sec. 30-92-5. - Standards and Speci cations. General. All landscape plans shall be prepared by either a registered landscape architect, certified nurseryman, arborist, or professional engineer. At a minimum, fifty (50) percent of all plantings shall be native and every effort should be made to incorporate healthy existing vegetation into the landscaping plan. No vegetation greater than thirty (30) inches in height shall be allowed in the clear sight triangle. For each tree removed from the disturbed area with a trunk diameter of twenty-four (24) inches or greater at five (5) feet above ground level, shall be replaced with one (1) of similar species or characteristics unless otherwise approved by the administrator. Buffer Yards. Buffer yards shall be reserved solely for screening and landscaping. No proposed building, building addition, structure, parking area or any other type of physical land improvement shall be located in a buffer yard. Not withstanding the above, a driveway entrance or a public road may cross a buffer yard if it is necessary for safe and convenient access to the building site. In addition, buffer yards may be used for greenways. When a proposed buffer yard has a variation in elevation of greater than six (6) vertical feet at any point, the required screening or landscaping within the yard shall be placed to maximize the effectiveness of the screening or landscaping, as determined by the administrator. The maximum slope of any required buffer yard shall be 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). Sufficient vegetation and ground cover shall be established and maintained on any slope to ensure stabilization and re-vegetation. In areas where extreme slopes exist, retaining walls no greater than four (4) feet in height may be used. If more than one (1) retaining wall is used, a planting area at least six (6) feet wide with a slope no greater than 3:1 must be left between the retaining walls. Existing vegetation within buffer yards shall be considered as a substitute for otherwise required screening, if in the opinion of the administrator, the type, size, and density of the existing vegetation complies with the following standards and the intent of this section. Any existing trees to be incorporated into the landscape must be adequately protected during construction to insure their survival (fencing around the drip line perimeter). Where deemed appropriate by the county zoning administrator, buffer yards may be allocated for the 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 4/9 (C) 1. 2. (D) 1. (E) 1. 2. 3. (F) 1. present or future use as a greenway. Screening. Screening shall be visually opaque, and constructed of a durable material. It shall be installed within a required buffer yard and shall be continuously maintained so as to meet the intent of this section. Acceptable screening materials include stockade fences, decorative masonry walls, brick walls, earth berms, and/or a mix of evergreen/deciduous vegetation. See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for examples of these screening materials. Alternative materials may be approved, if in the opinion of the administrator, their characteristics and design meet the intent and standards of this section. Berms. Berm height shall be measured from grade elevation to the top of the berm. (See diagrams in the Roanoke County Design Handbook for more detail.) Where a berm is located between different grades, the berm height shall be measured from the base of the higher grade elevation. Landscaping. Existing vegetation shall be considered as a substitute for otherwise required landscaping, if in the opinion of the administrator, the type, size, and density of the existing vegetation complies with the following standards and the intent of this section. Any existing vegetation to be preserved and incorporated into the landscape must be adequately protected during construction to insure their survival, as specified in the protection and preservation methods section (Section 30-92-4(E)). All plant material must meet American Association of Nurserymen Specifications for No. 1 grade. Native plantings are encouraged when compatible with the surrounding land use. Every effort should be made to incorporate healthy existing trees into the landscape and avoid the use of highly invasive species. (See Recommended Native/Naturalized Plant List in the Roanoke County Design Handbook.) All plant species chosen shall be suitable for planting and growth within the proposed environment and shall meet the size requirements in the following table. Plants used for screening purposes shall be planted in accordance with the on-center requirements of the table. If spacing requirements are not specified, required landscaping shall be arranged within a buffer yard to achieve the intent of this section. Size/Spacing/Number/Minimums Height At Planting Final Height Screening and Spacing Requirements Small shrubs 12″2′ minimum 2′ on center Large shrubs (evergreen or deciduous) 24″6′ minimum 5′ on center Small evergreen trees 5′15′ minimum 15′ on center Large evergreen trees 6—8′50′ minimum 20′ on center Small deciduous trees 1½″ caliper 15′ minimum 15′ on center Large deciduous trees 2″ caliper 50′ minimum 30′ on center Protection and preservation methods. Vegetation designated for protection and/or preservation shall be enclosed in a protection zone which establishes limits of construction disturbance to the root area of designated plant material. All protection zones and measures shall be established to the satisfaction of the zoning administrator. During construction, 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 5/9 * 2. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. 3. (A) 1. 2. 3. plastic or wood fencing shall be installed at the perimeter of all protection zones. Vegetation of specimen quality, historic designation or cultural value: Provide extraordinary measures to ensure complete protection/preservation Type of material specified may vary due to site-specific determinants. Silt, erosion control, or geotechnical fabric materials are not acceptable for use as vegetation protection. Areas designated for protection and/or preservation shall not be violated throughout the entire construction period by actions including, but not limited to: Placing, storing, or stockpiling backfill or construction related supplies. Felling trees into the designated area. Burning within or in close proximity. Modifying site topography in a manner which causes damage by collection/ponding or flow characteristics of site drainage. Trenching or grading operations. Operating equipment or machinery. Parking of construction vehicles. Temporary or permanent paving or impervious surface installation. Temporary or permanent utility construction installation. Disposal of construction debris or chemical pollutants. Work or construction related activities within areas designated for protection and/or preservation of existing vegetation shall be accomplished only with prior approval of the zoning administrator. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 111213- 15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-92-6. - Applicability of Regulations and Requirements. Screening, landscaping and buffer yards. Requirements of screening, landscaping and buffer yards between zoning districts shall be determined by using the following charts. See the buffer yard illustrations in the Roanoke County Design Handbook for more detail. The zoning administrator shall have final review of all buffer yards and will determine whether more screening is necessary based on site specific information such as terrain. If the buffer yard area is smaller than the typical buffer yard section denoted in the following illustrations, the landscaping required shall equal a proportion of the typical buffer yard landscaping. Where a fraction is calculated, the number shall be rounded up to the next whole number. Adjoining Zoning Site Zoning R-3 R-4 C-1 C-2 I-1 I-2 AG-3 D D D D D E AG-1 D D D D D E AR B B B or C B or C D E AV A A A A D E R-1 A A B C D E 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 6/9 R-2 A A B C D E R-3 B B B D E R-4 A B D E PRD D E NC B C C-1 B C C-2 B Type Option 1 (Large Bu er, Minimal Landscaping)Option 2 (Smaller Bu er With More Landscaping/Screening) A 20′ bu er For every 75′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12—14) One row of large deciduous shrubs (16-18) 15′ bu er For every 75′ consisting of: One row of small deciduous trees (5) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12—14) 6′ screening B 30′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16—18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24) 20′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (4) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16—18) 6′ screening C 40′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of small deciduous trees (6) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16—18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22—24) 30′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16—18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22—24) 6′ screening D 50′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) Two rows of small deciduous trees, two di erent species (6—7 per row) 35′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small evergreen trees (6—7) 6′ screening 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 7/9 (B) 1. 2. (C) 1. 2. 3. a. b. c. E 75′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of small deciduous trees (7) 50′ bu er For every 100′ consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small evergreen trees (6) One row of small deciduous trees (6—7) 6′ screening Adjacent right-of-way/street side plantings. Where a new or expanded development, or reconfigured parking area is proposed adjacent to a public street right-of-way, a planting strip shall be established between the parking areas and the adjacent right-of-way. The planting strip shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet. Within this planting strip a minimum of one (1) large deciduous tree shall be planted every thirty (30) linear feet along the public street right-of-way. Small trees planted every twenty (20) linear feet, may be used where an overhead power line or other obstruction is present. In addition, a minimum of two (2) large shrubs shall be placed in the planting strip for every five (5) linear feet of frontage. This should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for illustrations. Parking areas. New parking areas shall include planting islands and landscaped medians in combination with low impact design techniques that are planned, designed and located to channel traffic, facilitate storm water management, improve the appearance of parking areas and define and separate parking areas and aisles. In addition to accommodating vehicles, parking areas shall also provide for safe pedestrian and bicycle circulation. The integration of low impact design alternatives, including but not limited to bioretention areas, infiltration devices, grass swales, vegetated filter strips and permeable or pervious pavers are encouraged to address stormwater quality and quantity and to improve the appearance of the parking area, in accordance with the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Design Manual, as amended. Islands. (See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for additional detail) Rows of parking shall be separated by a planting island or bioretention planting island at least every fifteen (15) spaces and islands shall also be placed at the end of each row. Islands shall be spaced throughout the parking area and have a minimum dimension of nine (9) feet in width by nineteen (19) feet in length of planting area. To protect the plant material from vehicular damage, the island must be delineated by a clear physical barrier such as concrete curbs or set landscaping timbers. A minimum of one (1) small deciduous tree with surrounding turf grass or other ground cover shall be required in all planting islands. At the intersection of two (2) or more aisles, required trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained so as to preserve sight distance as determined by the zoning administrator. In making such determinations, the zoning administrator shall consider factors including, but not limited to, (a) seasonal 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 8/9 4. a. b. c. d. 5. 6. 7. a. b. (D) 1. 2. a. b. (E) 1. foliage or lack thereof, and (b) maximum and minimum sight distances, taking into consideration different sizes of vehicles, and shall conclude that safety and visibility will not be adversely affected by such trees and shrubs. Landscaped medians. (See the Roanoke County Design Handbook for additional detail) Where double rows of parking are planned, large parking areas shall have one landscaped median for every fifty (50) parking spaces to provide visual relief. Each landscaped median shall run the length of a parking aisle and shall measure at least fifteen (15) feet wide. Where possible, landscaped medians shall be designed for every other parking aisle. Each landscaped median shall be planted with one (1) small deciduous tree and six large shrubs per 30 linear feet with a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at the time of planting. Landscaped medians shall include sidewalks measuring at least five (5) feet wide to facilitate safe pedestrian circulation to and from destination(s). Wherever possible, parking area lighting shall be installed in landscaped medians. Lighting shall not conflict with required trees. Additional landscaping. In addition to the above requirements, three (3) large shrubs for every fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be planted around the perimeter of and/or adjacent to the parking area. Large paved areas. Paved areas greater than five hundred (500) square feet such as loading areas, that are not necessarily striped parking lots shall place one (1) planting island, as specified above for every seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of area and at least one (1) landscaped median. Landscaped medians and planting islands shall be located to screen the paved area from the public right-of-way or from adjacent properties, to channel traffic, and/or to define separate parking areas. The landscaped median shall not be required to have a sidewalk. Parking area expansions. Any expansion of a parking area shall require compliance with the requirements above for both the existing parking area and the proposed parking expansion. Exceptions are listed as follows: Expansions of ten (10) percent or less calculated by existing parking area square footage. The existing parking area may remain unchanged if all proposed parking spaces meet the landscaping requirements and are constructed of permeable or pervious pavers. See the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Design Manual for standards and specifications. Parking structures. Parking structures located underground shall not be required to provide planting islands or landscaped medians within the parking structure. Parking structures located above-ground shall not be required to provide planting islands or landscaped medians within the parking structure but shall provide: Landscaping around all sides of the structure for screening, or Integrate landscaping into all exposed structure walls. Landscaping requirements for new and expanded developments. Adequate minimum landscaping shall be provided as follows: The area coverage of trees and shrubs to be planted, together with the existing crown area of those retained shall occupy at least thirty-five (35) percent of the total land area of the proposed project. Total land area for 1/7/22, 1:42 PM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 9/9 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. (F) 1. 2. 3. purposes of this paragraph shall be the area shown on the site plan as the area of the site plan under consideration. The approved crown coverage allowances are listed below. They are based upon the anticipated size at maturity when located in a built environment. Type Minimum Height at Maturity Crown Coverage Allowance Large deciduous trees 50′ min. height 1,250 square feet each (35′) Large evergreen trees 30′ min. height 500 square feet each (22′) Small deciduous trees 15′ min. height 250 square feet each (15′) Small evergreen trees 15′ min. height 250 square feet each (15′) Large shrubs 5′ min. height 10 square feet each (3′) Small shrubs 2′ min. height 5 square feet each (2′) Shrub planting which apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements shall not exceed more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total crown coverage allowance requirements. Shrub plantings proposed for use as screen plantings (such as related to refuse service areas, outdoor storage areas, mechanical equipment, etc.) do not apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements. Groundcovers, perennial plantings, or turf grass do not apply toward crown coverage allowance requirements. Trees and shrubs used in bioretention areas and in other low impact design alternatives may be used to count towards crown coverage requirements. Landscaping shall be provided around the base of any freestanding sign proposed. The size of the landscaped area shall not be less than one and one-half (1.5) times the square footage of the sign. Landscaping shall be provided along the main entrance façade of all buildings, providing a vegetative area between the building and parking areas. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of small trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Additional screening requirements. All refuse service (dumpsters/containers) and outdoor storage areas in all zoning districts shall be screened from surrounding views per section 30-92-5 and as shown in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Height of screening must be a minimum of six (6) feet. Ground level and roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened or landscaped per section 30-92-5 and as shown in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Commercial and industrial use types shall screen from surrounding views all articles and materials being stored, maintained, repaired, processed, erected, fabricated, dismantled, or salvaged. Articles and materials available for retail sale by a commercial use type shall be exempt from this requirement. (Ord. No. 111301-10, §§ 1, 2, 11-13-01; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 052411- 9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 091019-4 , § 1, 9-24-20; Ord. No. 072721-8 , § 1, 7-27-21) Glenvar Community Plan A Component of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Adopted January 24, 2012 Glenvar Community Plan Plan Recommendations 8-5 restaurants. Also included are small, highway- oriented retail establishments providing goods and services to passing motorists. Such facilities should be designed to complement the character of the community; • General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian accommodations into their designs to link to surrounding development; • Limited Industrial - Low intensity industrial uses are encouraged. Such development should be clustered and should not have an adverse impact on air or water quality, the natural environment or scenic viewsheds; • Mixed Use – Developments that combine retail, service or other commercial uses with office and/ or residential use in the same building or on the same site; • Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like surroundings are encouraged. Such developments should be designed to enhance the rural and historic character of the area; • Parks and Outdoor Recreation/Ecotourism – Public and private recreation from small-scale community based facilities to regional attractions with greenway linkages and bike and pedestrian accommodations. Also encouraged are eco- and sustainable tourism businesses; and • Residential - Townhouse, low density multi-family, single-family attached and two-family dwellings are appropriate. Clustering and connectivity are encouraged. Land use determinants for this designation are: • Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where commercial or industrial uses have been developed or will likely be developed; • Existing Zoning - Locations where commercial or industrial zoning exists; • Access - Locations served by collector street system; and • Utility Availability - Locations where water and sewer service exist or can be provided. West Main Street Scenario 2 West Main Street Corridor Scenario 2 calls for area between Technology Drive and the City of Salem line to be changed from Principal Industrial and Transition to the proposed Glenvar Village future land use designation as shown in Graphic 8.03 below. The proposed Glenvar Village designation, identified by bright green on the map, is intended to serve as focal point for the Glenvar Community. This stretch of West Main Street is home to community identifiers such as the new Glenvar Library, Richfield Retirement Community, Fort Lewis Fire and Rescue Station, Fort Lewis Elementary, entrance to Glenvar Schools Complex, Pleasant Grove and Fort Lewis Baptist Church. Because of the area’s importance to the community, a high degree of architectural and creative site design is encouraged to enhance the rural and historic character of the area as well as pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between properties. A mix of uses on a parcel and/or along the West Main Street corridor is encouraged in the Glenvar Village designation. Graphic 8.03 West Main Street Scenario 2 Glenvar Community Plan Plan Recommendations 8-6 Land use types proposed for the Glenvar Village designation include: • Community Activity Centers - Public and private facilities serving surrounding residents including parks, schools, community clubs and meeting areas connected to residential areas by sidewalks, bikeways and/or greenways; • Commercial – Planned small-scale or clustered commercial such as local target area shopping centers with specialty businesses, personal services and sit-down or family-style restaurants. Such facilities should be designed to complement the character of the community; • General Retail Shops and Personal Services – Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian accommodations into their designs to link to surrounding development; • Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like surroundings are encouraged. Such developments should be designed to enhance the rural and historic character of the area; • Limited Industrial - Low intensity industrial uses are encouraged to locate south of Route 11/460; such development should be clustered and should not have an adverse impact on air or water quality, the natural environment or scenic viewsheds; • Mixed Use – Developments that combine retail, service and other commercial uses with office and/ or residential use in the same building or on the same site; • Parks and Outdoor Recreation/Ecotourism – Public and private recreation from small-scale community based facilities to regional attractions with greenway linkages and bike and pedestrian accommodations. Also encouraged are eco- and sustainable tourism businesses; • Residential - Townhouse, low density multi-family, single-family attached and two-family dwellings. Clustering and connectivity are encouraged. Land use determinants for the Glenvar Village include: • Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where commercial or industrial uses have been developed or will likely be developed; • Existing Zoning - Locations where commercial or industrial zoning exists; • Access - Locations served by collector street system; and • Utility Availability - Locations where water and sewer service exist. West Main Street Scenario 3 The proposed future land use change along the West Main Street corridor in Scenario 3 are shown below in Graphic 8.04 and include: • Changing the future land use designation of parcels from the former City of Salem water treatment plant to Crossmill Lane from Principal Industrial to Core; • Changing the future land use designation of parcels north of West Main Street from Daugherty Road to Alleghany Drive from Transition to Core; and • Changing the future land use designation of parcels south of West Main Street from Hawley Drive to the City of Salem line from Transition to Core. Graphic 8.04 West Main Street Scenario 3 Ronald Moran & Michael Boynton Rezone Approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial Board of Supervisors Public Hearing May 10, 2022 Location Map2 James River Equipment Glenvar Schools Fort Lewis Baptist Church Koppers Roanoke Plant R & L Carriers Terminal Frito-Lay Distribution Center Project Site •4038, 4056, 4066 Crossmill Lane •3.145 Acres •Residential homes and one vacant lot •Construct 2 buildings for industrial uses 3 4 Photographs 5 Photographs 6 Photographs 7 Photographs 8 Photographs 9 Photographs •Two Lots •Lot A –1.77 Acres •Lot B –1.375 Acres •Two Buildings •Building A –13,500 sf on Lot A •Building B –6,000 sf on Lot B •Two access points off Crossmill Lane •Type D Buffer •35 Feet •Small Evergreen Trees •Large Deciduous Trees •6-foot tall Screening Fence •Parking and SWM 10 Concept Plan Zoning Existing Zoning •R-1 –Low Density Residential District 11 Surrounding Zoning •North –R-1, I-1 •East –I-1 •West –I-1 •South –I-1 Future Land Use12 Glenvar Village •A future land use area intended to serve as focal point for the Glenvar Community. •Appropriate land uses include: •Community Activity Centers •Commercial •General Retail Shops and Personal Services •Limited Industrial •Mixed Use Office and Institutional •Parks and Outdoor Recreation/Ecotourism •Residential Planning Commission Public Hearing –April 5, 2022 •One (1) citizen spoke during the public hearing •Citizen Comments/Concerns •Types of uses proposed •Noise •Hours of operation •Buffers •Lighting •Property values 13 Planning Commission •Planning Commission Discussion •Proposed uses •Access •Noise •Construction phasing and schedule if approved •Buffers •Hours of operation •Lighting •Surrounding uses •Future land use designation 14 Planning Commission Planning Commission recommends approval to rezone 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial 15 Questions? 16 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 4038, 0, 4056, and 4066 Crossmill Lane, in the Catawba Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, and 2. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan and good zoning practice, or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 3.145 ACRES FROM R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO I-1 (LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4038 CROSSMILL LANE (TAX MAP NO: 055.03-03-44.00-0000), 0 CROSSMILL LANE (TAX MAP NO: 055.03-03-43.00-0000), 4056 CROSSMILL LANE (TAX MAP NO: 055.03 - 03-42.00-0000), AND 4066 CROSSMILL LANE (TAX MAP NO: 055.03 - 03-41.00-0000), IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton are requesting to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) District to I-1 (Low Intensity Industrial) District located at 4038 Crossmill Lane (Tax Map No: 055.03-03- 44.00-0000), 0 Crossmill Lane (Tax Map No: 055.03 -03-43.00-0000), 4056 Crossmill Lane (Tax Map No: 055.03-03-42.00-0000), and 4066 Crossmill Lane (Tax Map No: 055.03-03-41.00-0000), in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 2022, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 10, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as requested; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 2 of 2 1. The petition of Ronald Moran and Michael Boynton to rezone approximately 3.145 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) District to I-1 (Low Intensity Industrial) District, is approved. 2. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning of approximately 3.145 acres is consistent with the Future Land Use Designation of the properties as “Glenvar Village”. 3. The Board further finds that the proposed rezoning of approximately 3.145 acres is consistent with good zoning practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of WECO LLC to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 910 Paint Bank Road, Catawba Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance for a special use permit for a short term rental in a residential district. BACKGROUND: · The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a short-term rental as “the provision of a room or space that is suitable or intended for occupancy for dwelling, sleeping, or lodging purposes, for a period of fewer than 30 consecutive days, in exchange for a charge for the occupancy. This use does not in clude existing uses defined in this ordinance including bed and breakfast, bed and breakfast inn, boarding house, country inn, and hotel/motel/motor lodge.” · A short-term rental has several use and design standards. In the R -1 and R-2 zoning districts, a special use permit is required for a short-term rental on lots less than five (5) acres in size. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on April 5, 2022. No citizens spoke at the public hearing. Staff and the ap plicant provided the following information: there have been no complaints from neighboring property owners; the use Page 2 of 2 is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation; no changes are proposed to the house and property; the property has been rented as a long-term rental (more than 30 days) in the past; the applicant operates other short -term rentals; and the applicant is aware of the zoning permit requirement and the use and design standards. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance for a special use permit to operate a short -term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: WECO LLC Request: Obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: WECO LLC is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 910 Paint Bank Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The proposed special use permit is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a short-term rental as “the provision of a room or space that is suitable or intended for occupancy for dwelling, sleeping, or lodging purposes, for a period of fewer than 30 consecutive days, in exchange for a charge for the occupancy. This use does not include existing uses defined in this ordinance including bed and breakfast, bed and breakfast inn, boarding house, country inn, and hotel/motel/motor lodge.” Section 30-85-24.55 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains the following use and design standards for short-term rentals: (A) General Standards: 1. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit prior to the occupation of a room or dwelling for short- term rental. The zoning permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: a. All relevant parcel information including tax map number, zoning district, address, and magisterial district. b. The applicant’s name, address, and personal contact information. c. The name, address, and personal contact information of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints, if different from the applicant. 2. The County shall be notified within thirty (30) days of any change in the applicant’s address or of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints. 3. A short-term rental zoning permit expires upon any change in ownership of the property. 4. A short-term rental zoning permit may be revoked by the Zoning Administrator due to the failure of the applicant to comply with all applicable regulations set forth in this section or elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance or County Code. (B) In the R-1 and R-2 zoning district, the following standard shall apply: 1. A special use permit shall be required on lots less than five (5) acres. Lots that are five (5) acres or greater in size, a short-term rental shall be considered a use permitted by right. Since the property for this proposed short-term rental is zoned R-1 and is not five (5) acres or greater, a 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – This property contains a single family residence. The Roanoke County assessment records have estimated that this residence was built around 1930. The applicant purchased the home approximately twenty years ago and has rented the property on a long-term basis since 2006. The home has three bedrooms and two full bathrooms. parcel is entirely wooded and contains steep topography and a stream - Paint Bank Branch. The main portion (southwestern portion) of the parcel contains the home and an accessory structure. This portion of the property is flat with a very gradual slope that increases from the road to the western corner of the property. This portion of the property has several large deciduous trees as well as several evergreen trees and bushes. Road contains single family residences. 3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture – There are no proposed changes to the site. entrance from Paint Bank Road, which is a state maintained road. Adjoining Properties – Approximately 36 letters were mailed out to adjoining property owners. The letters contained the application information, hearing dates, and aerial map along with direct contact information for staff and instructions for how to submit comments. Agencies Comments Office of Building Safety – No comments. Roanoke County Transportation – No comments. Fire and Rescue – “Fire and Rescue does not object to this project and it will not increase the services provided.” Solid Waste – Solid Waste has “reviewed this request and do not see any issues. However, they would need to fill out a commercial application for trash collection since the home will be used for a business and not full-time residential use.” Western Virginia Water Authority – No comments. Roanoke County Engineering – No comments. VDOT – 1. A Land Use Permit will be required if a new entrance is needed from the VDOT right-of- way or for the change in use of an existing entrance. 2. The VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for entrances and intersections must be adhered to for private entrances. This includes, but is not limited to, stopping sight distance, which must be field verified and measures taken to ensure the minimum required distances can be met. 3. The department will not issue an approval of the plans or any necessary Land Use Permits until the locality approves this request. In addition, information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. Parks, Recreation, and Tourism - No impacts are foreseen to Parks, Recreation, and Tourism operations. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The proposed special use permit is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS WECO LLC is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a short term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 910 Paint Bank Road, Catawba Magisterial District. The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan indicates the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation is a future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The proposed special use permit is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. CASE NUMBER: # 1-4/2022 PREPARED BY: Alyssa Dunbar HEARING DATES: PC: April 5, 2022 BOS: April 26, 2022 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs R-1 District Regulations Neighborhood Conservation Land Use Designation Source: Es ri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earths tar Geograp hics , CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us er Community, Roanoke County, Va 2021, RoanokeCounty Roanoke County, Virginia2019 0 Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Aerial Map WECO LLC 910 Paint Bank Rd Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map: 044.03-05-39.00-0000 Lot Size: 2.28 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: R-1S SUP for Short-term Rental Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site Roanoke County, Virginia2019 0 Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Zoning Map WECO LLC 910 Paint Bank Rd Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map: 044.03-05-39.00-0000 Lot Size: 2.28 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: R-1S SUP for Short-term Rental Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site Source: Es ri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earths tar Geograp hics , CNES/Aribus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us er Communtiy, Roanoke County, Va 2021, Roanoke County Zoning Roanoke County, Virginia2019 0 Roanoke Co. Planning (540)772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 Future Land Use Map WECO LLC 910 Paint Bank Rd Salem, VA 24153 Tax Map: 044.03-05-39.00-0000 Lot Size: 2.28 Acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: R-1S SUP for Short-term Rental Magisterial District: Catawba Subject Site Future Land Use Neighborhood Conservation Source: Es ri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earth s tar Geogra p hic s , CNES/Aribus DS, USDA, USGS , AeroGRID, IGN, an d the GIS U s er Communtiy, Roanoke County, Va 2021, Roanok e County Rural Preserve 3/30/22, 7:55 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 1/4 (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-41. - R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. - Purpose. The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low-middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private* Residential Uses Accessory Apartment* Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit* Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * 3/30/22, 7:55 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 2/4 3. 4. 5. (B) 1. 2. Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * Civic Uses Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * 3/30/22, 7:55 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 3/4 3. 4. (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses Golf Course * Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22 , § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1 , § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9 , § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 020921-8 , § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-41-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 20,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. All lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 7,200 square feet. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: Principal structures: 10 feet. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: 3/30/22, 7:55 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances 4/4 a. b. 4. (C) 1. a. b. (D) 1. 2. Principal structures: 25 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: Principal structures: 45 feet. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15 , § 1, 11-12-13) Neighborhood Conservation: A future land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Land Use Types: Single-Family Residential - Attached and detached housing at a reasonable density that is not significantly higher than the existing neighborhood. Infill lots or community re-development should be designed to be sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood but can be at reasonably higher density. New single-family residential developments should incorporate greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Cluster developments are encouraged. Neighborhood Institutional Centers - Uses that serve the neighborhood residents including parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, recreational and park facilities, community meeting areas and clubs. These facilities should be linked to the residential areas by greenways, bike trails and pedestrian paths. Neighborhood Commercial - Low impact services to serve the local neighborhood that are consistent with the Community Plan design guidelines. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where limited density residential subdivisions have been platted and developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where limited density residential zoning has been established. EXPANSION AREAS - Locations where the expansion of the existing development pattern is logical. INFILL DEVELOPMENT - Locations where infill areas complement the surrounding development pattern. ACCESS - Locations served by a local street system. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. WECO LLC Special Use Permit for a Short-term Rental Board of Supervisors Public Hearing May 10, 2022 Location Map2 Project Site •910 Paint Bank Road •2.28 Acres •Single Family Home •Short-term Rental 3 4 Photographs Photographs5 Photographs6 7 Zoning Ordinance A short-term rental is defined as “the provision of a room or space that is suitable or intended for occupancy for dwelling, sleeping, or lodging purposes, for a period of fewer than 30 consecutive days, in exchange for a charge for the occupancy. This use does not include existing uses defined in this ordinance including bed and breakfast, bed and breakfast inn, boarding house, country inn, and hotel/motel/motor lodge.” 8 Zoning Ordinance (A)General Standards: 1. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit prior to the occupation of a room or dwelling for short-term rental. The zoning permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: a. All relevant parcel information including tax map number, zoning district, address, and magisterial district. b. The applicant’s name, address, and personal contact information. c. The name, address, and personal contact information of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints, if different from the applicant. 9 Zoning Ordinance 2.The County shall be notified within thirty (30) days of any change in the applicant’s address or personal contact information, or any change in the name, address or personal contact information of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints. 3.A short-term rental zoning permit expires upon any change in ownership of the property. 4.A short-term rental zoning permit may be revoked by the Zoning Administrator due to the failure of the applicant to comply with all applicable regulations set forth in this section or elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance or County Code. 10 Zoning Ordinance (B)In the R-1 and R-2 zoning district, the following standard shall apply: 1.A special use permit shall be required on lots less than five (5) acres. Lots that are five (5) acres or greater in size, a short-term rental shall be considered a use permitted by right. Zoning Existing Zoning •R-1 –Low Density Residential 11 Surrounding Zoning •North –R-1 •East –R-1 •West –R-1 •South –R-1 Future Land Use12 Neighborhood Conservation •Established Single-Family Residential neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Planning Commission Public Hearing –April 5, 2022 •No citizens spoke during the public hearing •Staff and applicant provided the following information: •there have been no complaints from neighboring property owners; •the use is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation; •no changes are proposed to the house and property; •the property has been rented as a long-term rental (more than 30 days) in the past; •the applicant operates other short-term rentals; and •the applicant is aware of the zoning permit requirement and the use and design standards. 13 Planning Commission Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit for a short-term rental 14 Questions? 15 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of W ECO LLC to obtain a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on approximately 2.28 acres on property zoned R -1 (Low Density Residential) District, located at 910 Paint Bank Road (Tax Map No: 044.03-05-39.00-0000), in the Catawba Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed special use permit request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan or good zoning practice, and/or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO WECO LLC TO OPERATE A SHORT-TERM RENTAL ON APPROXIMATELY 2.28 ACRES ON PROPERTY ZONED R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 910 PAINT BANK ROAD (TAX MAP NO: 044.03-05-39.00-0000), IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, W ECO LLC has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a short-term rental on property zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) District containing approximately 2.28 acres, located at 910 Paint Bank Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 2022, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 10, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed special use meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Page 2 of 2 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a m inimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The special use permit is hereby approved. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 1 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Wild Partners to obtain a special u se permit to operate a car wash on 1.03 acres on property zoned C - 2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3250 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinance for a special use permit for a car wash in a commercial district. BACKGROUND: · The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a car wash as “washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self - service car washes.” · A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2 zoning district. · In 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning of a larger parcel that included this property to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions and granted a Special Use Permit to operate a fast food restaurant and drive -thru on this property with 12 proffered conditions. · Most of the proffered conditions do not apply to the development of this site for a car wash. Those proffered conditions that do apply will be complied with in the development of the site. Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this special use permit application on April 5, 2022. No citizens spoke on this application during the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed the proffered conditions, traffic flow on the site, traffic counts on Route 419, construction timeline, water filtration s ystem, hours of operation, surrounding commercial uses, and consistency with the County's future land use designation of Core. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit to operate a car wash with four (4) conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash - Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash - Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 4. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building facade. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance granting a special use permit to operate a car wash in a C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, with four (4) conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash - Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. Page 3 of 3 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash - Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 4. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building facade. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Wild Partners - Ultimate Shine Car Wash Request: Obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1.03 acres zoned C- 2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions Car Wash – Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash – Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 4. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building façade. Wild Partners – Ultimate Shine Car Wash is requesting to obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1.03 acres at 3250 Electric Road. The submitted concept plan shows the development of one car wash building with exterior vacuums, parking, and supporting facilities. The existing structures shall be removed. The site is designated Core on the future land use map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger- scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally- designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Car washes are an appropriate use within the Core future land use designation. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a Car Wash as “washing and cleaning of vehicles. Typical uses include automatic conveyor machines and self-service car washes.” A car wash requires a special use permit in the C-2 zoning district. Section 30-85-10 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains the following use and design standards for a Car Wash: water recycling system for eighty-five (85) percent of the water used. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – In 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning of this property to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions and granted a Special Use Permit to operate a fast food restaurant and drive- thru on this property with 12 proffered conditions. Most of these conditions would not apply to the development of this site for a car wash. See attached ordinance 032399-8 for details. property is not in a floodplain overlay district or within a FEMA defined floodway and floodplain. The site has an existing restaurant building (formerly Ruby Tuesday), surrounding asphalt parking lot, minimal landscaping, and a freestanding sign (Ruby Tuesday). C-2C - High Intensity Commercial District with conditions. Other nearby zoning to the east is R-2 Medium Density Residential District and to the south across Route 419 is R-1 Low Density Residential. The surrounding uses include mostly commercial uses, and single family housing. The surrounding commercial uses include, but are not limited to; stores, restaurants, a gym, and a bank. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT feet, 36.5’ wide, 110’ in length, and 28.63’ tall. The car wash building is located on the east side of the property and will include one (1) drive through lane and supporting facilities on the side. The car wash pay station is three (3) lanes wide along the western portion of the property, perpendicular to Route 419. These three (3) lanes extend back along the property line allowing roughly 19 spaces for queuing. There is also a paved waiting queue in between the pay stations and the car wash building. There are 18 total parking spaces, all of which are vacuum stations (in the center of the property). Access/Traffic Circulation – As seen on the concept plan, there would be one access point to the property located at the northwest corner furthest from the carwash building. This access point would be made via Springwood Park Drive. The proposed exit would also be through the northern portion of the property, more centrally located, just north of the parking/vacuum stations. The current exit at the south of the property would be closed. According tho the traffic summary submitted by Balzer & Associates, the car wash use is expected to generate less traffic during the weekday PM peak hour than the previous restaurant use. Trip generation information was not available in the ITE Manual for the AM peak hour for the car wash use. However, it is expected that the AM trip generation will be lower than the PM trip generation and, therefore, lower than the AM trip generation for the restaurant. Please see the attachment “Traffic Summary” for additional details. Agency Comments – Various agencies commented on the submitted concept plan. The following comments were provided by the various agencies on this request: Building Safety: The Office of Building Safety stated that all construction shall meet the requirements of the applicable Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. long as volume does not exceed 3 - 95 gallon containers. The cans would have to be pulled down to Electric Road. If the volume of trash would exceed the limit imposed by the ordinance and therefore the owner will have to acquire a private dumpster. The property’s former occupant did not receive Roanoke County Solid Waste service. Fire & Rescue: Fire & Rescue does not object to the project as it will not increase the service they provide and stated it will address access and fire flow requirements during the site plan review process. Economic Development: Economic Development does not support the Special Use permit request by Ultimate Shine Car Wash because the proposed use is not the highest and best use for this property. The property is located at a highly desirable signalized intersection in a prime commercial corridor of Roanoke County, which is extremely limited or unavailable for commercial uses. A good faith effort to market the property as available for sale could have resulted in attracting other commercial tenants for this prime location. Economic Development has been marketing this property as available for lease only over the past year, with the understanding that it was not available for sale. As such, the property may have been dismissed by other potential users/buyers that may have otherwise considered this location for a use allowed by the current zoning. Economic Development's position is based upon the desire to attract a higher and better use to this highly desirable location that is consistent with the existing zoning. See the “Real Estate Listings” attachment for more details Engineering Department: There is an existing SWM facility serving the site that transfers with the property. The facility may be applicable to provide a portion of necessary SWM for the proposed development and existing conditions. Specific design requirements and details will be addressed during normal site plan submittal and review process. VDOT: The Department has no comments on this request. It appears from the information provided that redevelopment of this parcel as an automatic car wash will not adversely impact the VDOT right of way. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the parcel or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger- scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Car washes are an appropriate use within the Core future land use designation. The proposed project is in conformance with the Core future land use designation. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Wild Partners – Ultimate Shine Car Wash is requesting to obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1.03 acres at 3250 Electric Road. The submitted concept plan shows the development of one car wash building with exterior vacuums, parking, and supporting facilities. The proposed use of Car Wash by Wild Partners – Ultimate Shine Car Wash is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation of Core. CASE NUMBER: #4-4/2022 PREPARED BY: Will Crawford HEARING DATES: PC: April 5, 2022 BOS: April 26, 2022 ATTACHMENTS: Application Traffic Summary Aerial Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Photographs Ordinance 032399-8 C-2 District Standards Core Future Land Use Description Real Estate Listings Jonathan Yates Director of Real Estate Acquisitions Ultimate Shine Car Wash (540) 808-7410 jyates@ultimateshinecarwash.com February 11th, 2022 Department of Community Development – Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 planning@roanokecountyva.gov Re: Special Use Application – 3250 Electric Road To whom it may concern: Please find attached herewith our Special Use Application and supporting documents for Tax Parcel No. 077.13-05-49.00-0000. Our request for Special Use is to permit the construction and operation of an automated car wash facility. The site is currently developed as a full-service sit-down restaurant (vacated in June of 2020) of approximately 4,850 square feet. This vacant property had been openly marketed by Colliers International for over a year prior to contract inception. The existing site improvements will be demolished to support the new car wash improvements. We believe the use is consistent with Roanoke County’s future land use “Core” designation and plays an important role in serving the needs of our community. Should there be any questions please give me a call at (540) 808-7410. Sincerely, Jonathan Yates 1 Application Requirements Consultation with the County Planning staff to review the feasibility of the proposal and to obtain recommended procedures and technical assistance. Applicant is encouraged to contact adjoining property owners to inform them of the proposal. Application must be legible and signed by property owner, contract purchaser, or owner’s agent. Justification stating in general terms the change in use of the property, the effect of the changes on the surrounding area, the reasons for the request, the consistency of the request with the Community Plan, and the consistency of the request with the general purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose stated at the beginning of the applicable district regulations. Concept Plan of the proposed project and the concept plan checklist must be submitted with the applications. Plan must be 8.5” x 11”. Metes and bounds description must accompany rezoning application. Water and sewer application and planimetric maps must accompany rezoning and special use permit application, if applicable. List of adjoining property owners including owner’s names, addresses (mailing address including zip code) and tax map numbers of all adjoining properties and those directly across any public right-of-way must accompany application, including those in adjacent jurisdictions. Refer to tax records in the County Assessor’s office. Application fees must accompany application and are as follows: Rezoning − Agri/Single/Two $415 + $20/acre or portion thereof Rezoning − Multi-family $860 + $25/acre or portion thereof Rezoning − Industrial $840 + $30/acre or portion thereof Rezoning − Commercial $945 + $32/acre or portion thereof Land Use Plan Amendment $710 Special Use Β Landfill $1,875 Special Use Β Other $150 Variance $190 Waiver $190 Administrative Appeal $275 Technology Fee 3% fee on all permit issuing fees In addition, the applicant must pay legal advertisement fees. Staff will prepare ad for the applicant and deliver ad to The Roanoke Times. The applicant will be billed by The Roanoke Times for the ad. Public Hearing Notices must be posted at clearly visible locations along the street frontage or property lines of the subject property. Notices will be issued by Planning & Zoning following receipt of the completed application. For further information or assistance, please contact: Department of Community Development - Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone (540) 772-2068 - Fax (540)776-7155 E-Mail: planning@roanokecountyva.gov All required items must be submitted before the application deadline. 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: Received by: Application fee: PC/BZA date: Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning Ξ Special Use Variance Waiver Administrative Appeal Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: Work: _______________________ Cell #: Fax No.: ______________________ Owner’s name/address w/zip Phone #: ______________________ Work: _______________________ Fax No. #: _______________________ Magisterial District: Community Planning area: Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: ________ Existing Land Use: REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) ________________________ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: _____________________________________________________________________________________________. Appeal of Zoning Administrator’s decision to _______________________________________________________. Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):_____________ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to __________________________________________________________. Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner’s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. Owner’s Signature 423-581-2005 540-808-7410 Wild Partners 225 W1st N Street Suite 102 Morristown, TN 37814 National Retail Properties 450 S. Orange Avenue Orlando, FL 32801 407-650-3643 423-585-4353 321-206-2139 3250 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Cave Spring Full Service Restaurant C2C - General Commercial Cave Spring 077.13-05-49.00-0000 1.03 C2S - High Intensity Commercial W/Special Use Commercial - Car Wash X X X X X N/A X X X Jonathan Yates - On Behalf of Wild Partners 3 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Wild Partners - DBA Ultimate Shine Car Wash Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The request furthers the purpose of the Roanoke County Ordinance by locating commercial activity along an established commercial corridor which serves large segments of the county's population. This is furthered by re-developing a vacant commercial structure that has been unsuccessfully marketed for current restaurant use. The property is currently zoned C2C. Modern "express" car washing is a retail-related convenience item, primarily done on the way to another destination or activity, e.g. to the grocery store or place of work. Express car washes tend to generate business from existing traffic rather than generate new traffic to the area. The site will be consistent with Roanoke County future land use designation "Core" by locating a proven retail business model along the arterial Electric Road Corridor. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed development will be in conformance with setback, yard, frontage, signage, and other specifications as specified by Roanoke County zoning code. As shown in the attached rendering and elevations, building design and finishings will be high-quality and in conformance with modern retail development. Furthermore, proposed improvements are in conformance with the existing development conditions attached to the parcel. Modern and environmentally friendly car wash facilities such as proposed play an important role in mixed-use districts such as the subject . Express wash facilities such as our proposed project is the least environmentally impactful way to wash a vehicle and prevents harmful runoff to local storm water that is present in driveway washing. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed improvements will replace a vacant full-service restaurant. Daily trip generation is similar between the former use and the proposed use. Given the proposed stacking area , the throughput capability of the wash, and the adequate vacuum station parking spaces, no impact on neighboring businesses/residential should be realized. Our concept benefits from an environmentally-friendly design that uses modern technology and equipment from the world's largest manufacture of vehicle wash equipment to minimize energy consumption and water per vehicle. Over 90% of wash water is recycled and treated for re-use. As a result of these efforts, minimal impact is realized on existing public water and sewer infrastructure. The proposed entrance to the subject property is from Springwood Park Drive (signalized) and will have minimal impact on public roadways. Entrance to the proposed improvements and wash queuing lanes have been designed to allow adequate stacking and efficiency. No modification to the existing right of way is required to promote safe ingress/egress to the site. Ex h i b i t S h o w i n g W a t e r /S e w e r T o p o g ra p h y A-201 ELEVATIONS A1 SOUTH (OFFICE) ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" C1 NORTH (TUNNEL) ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" A5 EAST (ENTRY) ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" C5 WEST (EXIT) ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR FINISHES 1607 E. MAIN STREET SALEM, VA 24153 ULTIMATE SHINE CARWASH n Fax Phone faldesco@gmail.com 4622 Chambliss Avenue K copyright 2020 584 584 865 865 le,T N . . vixo l © 97 . . 3 9 3139 7868 1 FALCONNIER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 5/8/20 FIN A L A P P R O V E D C O P Y A-301 BUILDING SECTIONS A1 BUILDING SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0" 1607 E. MAIN STREET SALEM, VA 24153 ULTIMATE SHINE CARWASH n Fax Phone faldesco@gmail.com 4622 Chambliss Avenue K copyright 2020 584 584 865 865 le,T N . . vixo l © 97 . . 3 9 3139 7868 1 FALCONNIER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 5/8/20 D5 PARTIAL ROOF SECTION AT TUNNEL DOORS 1/2" = 1'-0" FIN A L A P P R O V E D C O P Y Pertaining to the special use application for: Parcel: 077.13-05-49.00-0000 3250 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 County of Roanoke Community Development – Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 To Whom It May Concern: Please see the following list of adjacent property owners for the purposes of notifying land owners of the proposed special -use permit. Parcel Owner, Agent, Or Occupant Mailing Address Physical Address 077.13-05-43.02-0000 Bank of Botetourt P.O. BOX 450 Troutville, VA 24175 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24014 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24014 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Beane, Mechelina 1324 PW Almere Roanoke, VA 24018 Sanders, Connie Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Williams, Freddie Elwood Jr Roanoke, VA 24019 Roanoke, VA 24018 6 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra ALL APPLICANTS a.Applicant name and name of development b.Date, scale and north arrow c.Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d.Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e.Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f.The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g.All property lines and easements h.All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i.Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j.Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k.Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site l.Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m.Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n.Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o.Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p.Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q.If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N/A N/A 0022/11/20222022 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: •Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units •Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) •Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash •Retail shop/Shopping center •Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) •Regional public facilities •Educational/Recreational facilities •Religious assemblies •Hotel/Motel •Golf course •Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic •Industrial site/Factory •Day care center •Bank •Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: •Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) •For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly •When required to evaluate access issues •Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) •Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem •Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) •Substantial departure from the Community Plan •Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Wild Partners - DBA Ultimate Shine Name of Petition ____________________________________ Petitione’s Signature ______02/11/2022_______ Date 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 540.772. March 22, 2022 Ms. Rebecca James, Zoning Administrator County of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: S.U.P. Request for Ultimate Shine Car Wash – Traffic Summary Balzer & Associates, Inc. Project Number: 04220014.00 The purpose of this document is to summarize the anticipated trip generation and to provide discussion of anticipated traffic impacts for the Ultimate Shine Car Wash project located at 3250 Electric Road in Roanoke County (Tax Parcel #077.13-05-49.00-0000). The subject property currently consists of a vacant restaurant building and associated parking area. The building was previously the site of a Ruby Tuesday sit-down restaurant that consisted of 200 seats. Our client has applied for a Special Use Permit to allow for a 3,950 s.f. automated car wash to be constructed on the property. The property is currently zoned C2 – High Intensity Commercial and consists of approximately 1.03 acres. Trip generation calculations are provided below for the proposed car wash use, as well as for the previous restaurant use, based on the formulas provided within the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, 11th Edition, which is the widely accepted method for estimating trip generation. ITE Code 948 – Automated Car Wash 3,950 s.f. Weekday AM Peak Hour: N/A Weekday PM Peak Hour: 28 Enter, 28 Exit, 56 Total Trips ITE Code 932 – High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 200 seats Weekday AM Peak Hour: 55 Enter, 50 Exit, 105 Total Trips Weekday PM Peak Hour: 44 Enter, 34 Exit, 78 Total Trips It should be noted that calculations have been provided for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, as these are generally accepted to be the most critical times when overall traffic volumes and traffic congestion are highest. These peak times represent the portions of the day when the most vehicles are on the road when people are traveling to and from school, work, etc. It is likely that both the restaurant and the car wash will generate higher volumes of traffic on their own at different days or times of the week. For example, the restaurant would likely have generated higher volumes of traffic at mealtimes and on weekends. Likewise, the car wash will likely generate higher volumes on the weekends as well. However, because this will not correlate with the peak traffic on the roadway, this is not generally analyzed or studied. En v i s i o n i n g T o m o r r o w , D e s i g n i n g T o d a y As shown in the calculations above, the car wash use is expected to generate less traffic during the weekday PM peak hour than the previous restaurant use. Trip generation information was not available in the ITE Manual for the AM peak hour for the car wash use. However, it is expected that the AM trip generation will be lower than the PM trip generation and, therefore, lower than the AM trip generation for the restaurant. In addition to the information cited above, it should also be noted that there are many by- right commercial uses that could be developed on this site without a Special Use Permit that would generate much higher traffic volumes than the proposed car wash use. Based on the information provided in this letter, the proposed development is not anticipated to have a significant traffic impact and no further analysis is warranted. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any concerns and/or questions. Sincerely, BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher Burns, P.E. Associate Automated Car Wash (948) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Car Wash Tunnels On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. Num. of Car Wash Tunnels: 1 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Car Wash Tunnel Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 77.50 50.00 - 104.50 33.07 Data Plot and Equation 0 1 2 30 100 200 300 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = Number of Car Wash Tunnels T = T r i p s E n d s 929General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 1 Avg. Num. of Seats: 148 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.37 4.37 - 4.37 *** Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size 0 100 2000 200 400 600 800 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = Number of Seats T = T r i p s E n d s 685General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. Num. of Seats: 159 Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.45 0.30 - 0.65 0.13 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 2000 100 200 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.81(X) - 57.37 R²= 0.58 X = Number of Seats T = T r i p s E n d s 686 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 14 Avg. Num. of Seats: 142 Directional Distribution: 57% entering, 43% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.39 0.16 - 1.73 0.39 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 200 3000 100 200 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = Number of Seats T = T r i p s E n d s 687General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 0 145 290 2 Aerial Map Wild Partners Total Acreage: 1.03 Acres Existing Zoning: C-2C Proposed Zoning: C-2C Future Land Use: Core Magisterial District: Cave Spring Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 580 F eeeet aD te: 2/17/2022 0 145 290 2 Zoning Map Wild Partners Total Acreage: 1.03 Acres Existing Zoning: C-2C Proposed Zoning: C-2C Future Land Use: Core Magisterial District: Cave Spring Zoning C-2 C R-1 Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 580 F eeeet aD te: 2/17/2022 R-2 R2 R1 C-1 0 145 290 2 Future Land Use Map Wild Partners Total Acreage: 1.03 Acres Existing Zoning: C-2C Proposed Zoning: C-2C Future Land Use: Core Magisterial District: Cave Spring Core Neighborhood Conservation Roanoke Co. Planning (540) 772-2068 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke VA 24018 580 F eeeet aD te: 2/17/2022 Future Land Use Rev i s ed t o c o r r ec t T ax Ma p an d Mag i s t er i al Di s t r i c t Rev i s ed t o c o r r ec t C-2 t o C-2 w i t h c o n d i t i o n s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY IO-ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ALL OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13- 5-43.2; 77.13-547; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 AND C-2 WITH CONDITIONS TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE-THRUS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately acres, as described herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road (All of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-39; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-51) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and C-2, General Commercial District with 1 conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District with conditions. 2.That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates LLC. 3.That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Springwood Associates LLC to operate fast food restaurants and drive-thrus to be located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road on three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 4.That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. A buffer strip, as shown on the March 22, 1999 plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22’ above grade. No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop; Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. (9)The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. (10)The exterior of all buildings will be constructed of brick, drivit and/or masonry on all sides of buildings.All buildings will be finished to grade with said materials. (1 The property may be developed in substantial conformity with the conceptual development plan prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. (12)The three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the plans prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto, may be developed either for one, two or three fast food restaurants with traffic flow patterns in substantial accordance with the plans attached hereto if Special Use Permits are issued for the same, or should any or all of said sites not be used for fast food restaurants, those portions of the property may be used for any use permitted in a C-2 district other than those which are prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel by the provisions of these proffers. 5.That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419, Electric Road, at the southwesterly corner of the Rite Aid property; thence leaving Route 419 and with the Rite Aid property and proceeding N. 01 deg. 50 sec. 26 min. W. 111.57 feet to a point; thence N. 13 deg. 23 sec. 34 min. E. 116.17 feet to a point; thence N. 82 deg. 29 min. 30 sec. E. 58.55 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 40 min. 25 sec. E. 313.06 feet to a point; thence S. 76 deg. 56 min. 51 sec. E. 1.54 feet to a point; thence N. 23 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. E. 166.11 feet to a point; thence S. 74 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. E. 110.78 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 35 min. 55 sec. E. 519.51 feet to a point; thence s. 38 deg. 31 min. 50 sec. W. 344.09 feet to a point; thence S. 53 deg. 23 min. 02 sec. E. 236.76 feet to a point; thence S. 64 deg. 49 min. 34 sec. W. 101.93 feet to a point; thence S. 55 deg. 31 min. 06 sec. E. 34.13 feet to a point; thence S. 20 deg. 06 min. 28 sec. W. 136.88 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03 min. 14 sec. W. 359.12 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 54 min. 15 sec. W. 298.98 feet to the point of beginning. 6.That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES:Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS:None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney C-2 District Regulations 1 SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi-Family Dwelling * Two-Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * C-2 District Regulations 2 Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Automobile Dealership * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast * C-2 District Regulations 3 Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center * Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial * Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food * Restaurant, General C-2 District Regulations 4 Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Dance Hall C-2 District Regulations 5 Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini-warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213- 15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16) Sec. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). C-2 District Regulations 6 b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. C-2 District Regulations 7 (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) Core: A future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types: General Retail Shops and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional Uses - Planned developments are encouraged. Limited Industrial Uses - Planned uses in areas designated as economic opportunity areas. Land Use Determinants: EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. EXISTING ZONING - Locations where commercial zoning exists. ACCESS - Locations served by an arterial street system. POPULATION CENTER - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations. URBAN SECTOR - Locations served by urban services. 3/22/22, 9:28 AM 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 - Ruby Tuesday | LoopNet https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3250-Electric-Rd-Roanoke-VA/22220097/1/5 Retail Space / Virginia / Roanoke / 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 RUBY TUESDAY 3250 Electric Rd Roanoke, VA 24018 Ruby Tuesday · Retail Property For Lease Proper ty Type Retail Year Built 2001 Proper ty Restaurant Parking 1 1.26/1,000 Help 3/22/22, 9:28 AM 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 - Ruby Tuesday | LoopNet https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3250-Electric-Rd-Roanoke-VA/22220097/2/5 NEARBY MAJOR RETAILERS Subtype Ratio SF Gross Leasable Area 5,106 SF ABOUT THE PROPERT Y • 4,860 SF • ±1.03 acres • Excellent location with great visibility and access • Zoned C2-C • 80 parking spaces • Built in 2001 • $22.00 PSF Pylon Sign Help 3/22/22, 9:28 AM 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 - Ruby Tuesday | LoopNet https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3250-Electric-Rd-Roanoke-VA/22220097/3/5 More public record information on 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 The Cave Spring Retail Proper ty at 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 is currently available. Contact Colliers | Virginia for more information. YOU MAY ALSO LIKE Listing ID: 22220097 Date Created: 2/11/2021 Last Updated: 3/14 /2022 Address: 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA RETAIL PROPERTIES IN NE ARBY NEIGHBORHO ODS Cave Spring Retail Space Downtown Roanoke City Retail Space Hollins Retail Space Norwich Retail Space Colonial Avenue Area Retail Space South Jef ferson Retail Space Hur t Park Retail Space West End Retail Space Williamson Road Retail Space Roundhill Retail Space Hollins-Roanoke City Retail Space Eastgate Retail Space 125 N Main St - Town Centre 11,135 SF Available Help 3/22/22, 9:28 AM 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 - Ruby Tuesday | LoopNet https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3250-Electric-Rd-Roanoke-VA/22220097/4/5 Downtown Salem Retail Space Deyerle Retail Space Miller Cour t-Arrowood Retail Space NE ARBY LISTINGS 5051 Benois Rd, Roanoke VA 2033 Cook Dr, Salem VA 3524 Brambleton Ave, Roanoke VA 200 Rowan St, Salem VA 801-805 Norfolk Ave SW, Roanoke VA 619 Centre Ave Centre Avenue NW, Roanoke VA 1501 Roanoke Blvd, Salem VA 4633 Brambleton Ave, Roanoke VA 130 Church Ave SW, Roanoke VA 4335 Brambleton Ave, Roanoke VA 2224 Buford Ave, Roanoke VA 27 Church Ave SW, Roanoke VA 513 Salem Ave SW, Roanoke VA 351 Campbell Ave SW, Roanoke VA 541 Luck Ave SW, Roanoke VA The LoopNet service and information provided therein, while believed to be accurate, are provided "as is". LoopNet disclaims any and all representations, warranties, or guarantees of any kind. About Us Contact Us Search Find a Broker Help 3/22/22, 9:28 AM 3250 Electric Rd, Roanoke, VA 24018 - Ruby Tuesday | LoopNet https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3250-Electric-Rd-Roanoke-VA/22220097/5/5 Connect with us © 2022 CoStar Group Product Over view Mobile Terms of Use Privacy Policy Help 3/22/22, 9:27 AM Retail For Lease — Virginia | United States | USA1088703 | Colliers https://www.colliers.com/en/properties/3250-electric-road/usa-3250-electric-road-roanoke-va-24018/usa1088703#RelatedDocs 1/2 Learn more about this property online at: https://www.colliers.com/p-usa1088703 3250 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 3250 Electric Road Retail | For Lease: 4,860 SF Retail Opportunity Property Details Property Types Retail Features •4,860 SF •±1.03 acres •Excellent location with great visibility and access •Zoned C2-C •80 parking spaces •Built in 2001 •$22.00 PSF 3/22/22, 9:27 AM Retail For Lease — Virginia | United States | USA1088703 | Colliers https://www.colliers.com/en/properties/3250-electric-road/usa-3250-electric-road-roanoke-va-24018/usa1088703#RelatedDocs 2/2 Location Map data ©2022 Google Rob Black Senior Vice President Richmond - North License #: 225157168 +1 804 267 7203 Robby Brownfield Senior Vice President Richmond - North License #: 225042738 +1 804 267 7227 Wild Partners Special Use Permit for a Car Wash Board of Supervisors Public Hearing May 10, 2022 Location Map2 Johnson Orthodontics Bank of Botetourt El Rodeo Goodwill Truist Crunch Fitness Shopping Center Shopping Center Project Site •3250 Electric Road •1.03 Acres •Vacant Restaurant (Ruby Tuesday) •Proposed Car Wash 3 Photographs4 Photographs5 Photographs6 Photographs7 Photographs8 Photographs9 10 Zoning Background •In 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning of this property to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions and granted a Special Use Permit to operate a fast food restaurant and drive-thru on this property with 12 proffered conditions. 11 Proffered Conditions 1.The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. 2.A buffer strip, as shown on the March 22, 1999 plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. 3.No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22’ above grade. 4.No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. 5.All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. 6.The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. 12 Proffered Conditions 7.The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. 8.The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop; Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. 9.The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. 13 Proffered Conditions 10.The exterior of all buildings will be constructed of brick, drivitand/or masonry on all sides of buildings. All buildings will be finished to grade with said materials. 11.The property may be developed in substantial conformity with the conceptual development plan prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 12.The three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the plans prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto, may be developed either for one, two or three fast food restaurants with traffic flow patterns in substantial accordance with the plans attached hereto if Special Use Permits are issued for the same, or should any or all of said sites not be used for fast food restaurants, those portions of the property may be used for any use permitted in a C-2 district other than those which are prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel by the provisions of these proffers. •Car Wash Building •3,950 square feet •110’ long x 36.5’ wide •28.63 feet in height •Pay Stations •3 lanes wide •19 spaces for queuing •18 Parking Spaces with Vacuum Stations •Screened Dumpster 14 Concept Plan 15 Landscaping Plan 16 Architectural Rendering 17 Architectural Rendering Zoning Existing Zoning •C-2C –High Intensity Commercial with Conditions 18 Surrounding Zoning •North –C-2C, R-2 •East –C-2C, R-2 •West –C-2C •South –R-1 (across 419) Future Land Use19 Core •Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban development is encouraged. •Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. •Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based shopping facilities. •Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Planning Commission Public Hearing –April 5, 2022 •No citizens spoke during the public hearing •Planning Commission Discussion •Proffered conditions •Traffic flow on the site •Traffic counts on Route 419 •Construction timeline •Water filtration system •Hours of operation •Surrounding commercial uses •Consistency with the County's Core future land use designation 20 Planning Commission Planning Commission recommends approval of the Special Use Permit for a car wash with four (4) conditions: •The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash -Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. •Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash -Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. •The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. •The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building facade. 21 Questions? 22 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Mary Beth Nash Rachel W. Lower Marta J. Anderson SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of Wild Partners to obtain a special use permit for a car wash on approximately 1.03 acres on property zoned C -2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3250 Electric Road (Tax Map No: 077.13-05-49.00-0000), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed special use permit: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to obtain a special use permit, with the following conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash – Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 2. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash – Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. 3. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. 4. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building façade. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed special use permit request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan or good zoning practice, and/or OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO WILD PARTNERS TO OPERATE A CAR WASH ON APPROXIMATELY 1.03 ACRES ON PROPERTY ZONED C-2C (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, LOCATED AT 3250 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO: 077.13-05-49.00-0000), IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Wild Partners has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 1.03 acres on property zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, located at 3250 Electric Road (Tax Map No: 077.13-05-49.00-0000), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 2022, and the second reading and public hearing were held on May 10, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition to obtain a special use permit, with four conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed special use meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Page 2 of 2 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The special use permit is hereby approved, with the following conditions: a. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash – Conceptual Site Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. b. Landscaping on the property shall be in substantial conformance with the “Proposed Car Wash – Conceptual Landscape Plan” prepared by Site, Incorporated Civil Engineers & Surveyors dated February 11, 2022, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. c. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance to the architectural renderings submitted with the application dated May 8, 2020. d. The dumpster enclosure shall be constructed with masonry materials and colors that match those used on the building façade. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Open district appointments BACKGROUND: 1. Library Board (appointed by District) The following District appointments remain open: Vinton Magisterial District 2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District) The following appointments remain open: Mike Roop’s three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 2019. Rich Tomlinson's three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 2021. Murray Cook's three (3) year term representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District expired June 30, 2020. There is also one open Windsor Hills Magisterial District appointee. Page 2 of 2 3. Roanoke County Economic Development Authority (EDA)(appointed by District) Steve Musselwhite’s four-year term on the EDA expired on September 26, 2021 and he does not wish to be reappointed. 4. Roanoke County Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) Kathryn Sowers’ three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District expired July 31, 2021. Ms. Sowers has served two (2) terms and cannot be reappointed. Catherine Nugent’s three (3) year term representing the Catawba Magisterial District expired July 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 10, 2022, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes – January 25, 2022 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $101,164.96 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-For-Life" distribution 3. Confirmation of appointment to the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA)(At-Large) 4. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Craig V. Pendleton, Firefighter/EMT, upon his retirement after more than nineteen (19) years of service Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $101,164.96 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-For-Life" distribution SUBMITTED BY: C. Travis Griffith Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and allocate funds in the amount of $101,164.96 for the "Four -For-Life" program from the Virginia Department of Health (VDOH) Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS). BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Health (VDOH) Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS), has awarded the Fire and Rescue Department grant funds totaling $101,164.96 as part of the "Four-for-Life" program funding. "Four-for-Life" funding is legislated by the Code of Virginia §46.2-694 and provides various grant programs to be used only for emergency medical service purposes. The "Four-for-Life" program, as amended in 2000, stipulates that four (4) additional dollars be charged and collected at the time of registration of each passenger vehicle, pickup, or panel truck. Funds may be u tilized for training, equipment, and supplies for licensed, non-profit emergency medical service agencies. DISCUSSION: This grant awarded to the Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department will be utilized to purchase Emergency Medical Service (EMS) equipment that meets state guidelines. Page 2 of 2 Approval of this grant funding from VDOH is dependent upon appropriate and timely submission of required annual reporting. The Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department continues to meet those annual requirements to remain elig ible for grant funding. FISCAL IMPACT: Awarded grant funds from the "Four-for-Life" program total $101,164.96. There is no County match required with acceptance of this grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of gran t funds to the Fire and Rescue Department in the amount of $101,164.96 from the Virginia Department of Health Office of Emergency Medical Services. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA)(At-Large) SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointment to the South Peak CDA BACKGROUND: Rick Pevarski currently serves as the founding President and Chief Executive Officer of VA811, Inc. in Roanoke, Virginia, which provides the one-call notification services for the Commonwealth of Virginia. VA811 was a startup organization that Rick cre ated from the original business plan to fruition as a functioning organization. Prior to this, Rick was a 17-year employee of Roanoke Gas Company in Roanoke, Virginia where he served as Vice-President of Operations & Marketing. Attached is the bio for Mr. Pevarski. Staff has recommended the appointment of Rick Pevarski to this CDA. This appointment has a four-year term and will expire May 10, 2026. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of this appointment. Rick Pevarski President & CEO VA811, Inc. Rick Pevarski currently served as the founding President & Chief Executive Officer of VA811, Inc. in Roanoke, Virginia, which provides the one-call notification services for the Commonwealth of Virginia. VA811 was a startup organization that Rick created from the original business plan to fruition as a functioning organization. Prior to this, Rick was a 17-year employee of Roanoke Gas Company in Roanoke, Virginia where he served as Vice-President of Operations & Marketing. Board positions held: Lead Virginia Class of 2011 and Board of Directors – (Board Chair, 2020) Norfield Development Partners, LLC – (Initial Board Chair) Virginia Geographical Information Network (VGIN) Advisory Board State Corporation Commission Damage Prevention Advisory Board – (Vice-Chair) Common Ground Alliance – Board of Directors (Executive Committee – Secretary) Southeastern Gas Association – Board of Directors Virginia Underground Utility Protection Service, LLC – Board of Directors Junior Achievement of the Roanoke Valley – Board of Directors – (Executive Committee) Conflict Resolution Center – Board of Directors Prevention of Child Abuse of the Roanoke Valley – Board of Directors – (Board Chair) Cooper’s Cove Community Center – Board President Professional and community involvement: US DOT Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee Southwest Business Development Association One Calls of America FEMA “Project Impact” Committee Virginia Western Community College Advisory Committee One Call Systems International – Past Chair Joint Industry & S.C.C. Committee for the Regulation of Underground Gas Storage Virginia Gas Operators Virginia Oil & Gas Association American Gas Association, ANSI / GPTC Z380 Gas Pipeline Technology Committee American Gas Association Best Practices Committee Virginia Underground Utility Coordinating Committee American Gas Association Strategic Marketing Committee City of Salem Site Plan Review Committee Rotary Club Downtown Roanoke Southwest Business Development Association (SWBDA) B.A., Petroleum Engineering, Montana School of Mines M.B.A., Business Administration, Averett College Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Craig V. Pendleton, Firefighter/EMT, upon his retirement after more than nineteen (19) years of service SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Recognition of Craig V. Pendleton's retirement. BACKGROUND: Craig V. Pendleton, Firefighter/EMT, retired on March 1, 2021, after nineteen (19) years and two (2) months of service with Roanoke County. DISCUSSION: Mr. Pendleton is unable to attend today’s Board meeting and his resolution and quilt will be mailed to his home. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO CRAIG V. PENDLETON, FIREFIGHTER/EMT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN NINETEEN (19) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Craig V. Pendleton was employed by Roanoke County on January 14, 2002; and WHEREAS, Mr. Pendleton retired on March 1, 2021, after nineteen (19) years and two (2) months of devoted, faithful, and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Pendleton, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life and providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, throughout Mr. Pendleton’s tenure with Roanoke County, he served on a number of significant fires and medical incidents; and suffered a severe injury on a structure fire in 2016, but after months of challenging rehabilitation, he returned to service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to CRAIG V. PENDLETON for more than nineteen (19) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Capital Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves Audited balance as of June 30, 2021 23,632,859$ ‐$ 250,000$ 2,511,151$ Addition of 2020‐21 operations and close out of completed projects 27,056 Approved Sources: Appropriated from 2021‐22 budget (Ordinance 051121‐5) 491,803 50,000 252,597 Allocated from year end designations‐December 14, 2021 7,910,896 Approved Uses: Appropriated for 2021‐22 budget (Ordinance 051121‐6)(2,525,167) Balance at May 10, 2022 24,124,662$ 12.3% 50,000$ 502,597$ 7,923,936$ County of Roanoke Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Fiscal Year 2021‐2022 General Government Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Audited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2021 Additions Deletions May 10, 2022 VPSA School Bonds 74,515,490$ 19,910,000$ 8,552,438$ 85,873,052$ Lease Revenue Bonds 77,530,000 - 3,630,000 73,900,000 Subtotal 152,045,490 19,910,000 12,182,438 159,773,052 Premiums 10,777,149 2,543,232 - 13,320,381 162,822,639$ 22,453,232$ 12,182,438$ 173,093,433$ Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Approved By Richard L. Caywood County Administrator 04-26-22 ACTION NO.___________________ ITEM NUMBER_______________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. : May 10, 2022 : Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 31-Mar-22 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASH INVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 6,204,404.19 6,204,404.19 GOVERNMENT: SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA (942,330.00) SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 51,500,860.21 WELLS FARGO 0.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA 0.00 50,558,530.21 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION 17,818,234.19 17,818,234.19 MONEY MARKET: ATLANTIC UNION BANK 4,543,666.77 HOMETRUST BANK 4,042,133.38 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 10,088.02 WELLS FARGO 5,288,587.42 13,884,475.59 PUBLIC FUNDS: BANK OF BOTETOURT 2,000,416.38 2,000,416.38 TOTAL 90,466,060.56 Oiounty of ~oanokr ~,,. ~ /.... . . .,, z G'> ::::> -0 ~ u ~ DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY 2022 TO BE GUILLIAN-BARRE SYNDROME (GBS) AND CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DEMYLELINATING POLYNEUROPATHY (CIDP) AWARENESS MONTH IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the month of May 2022 has been designated as "GBS and CIDP Awareness Month" to educate the public and to focus attention on Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) , which are rare, paralyzing and potentially catastrophic disorders of the peripheral nerves; and WHEREAS, the cause of GBS and CIDP is unknown. The length of the illness is unpredictable. It is characterized by the rapid onset of weakness and often, paralysis of the legs, arms, breathing muscles and face. Usually months of hospital care are required with patients and families facing an uncertain future, not knowing if and when recovery will occur. Some may face long-term disabilities of varying degrees. GBS and CIDP can develop in any person at any age, regardless of gender or ethnic background; and WHEREAS, in 1980, the Guillian-Barre Syndrome Foundation International (now the GBS/CIDP Foundation International), was founded to provide a support network to patients and ~heir families through the national office headquarters in Philadelphia and its 174 chapters with more than 30,000 members throughout the United States, Canada, Asia, Europe, South America and Sou~h Africa; and Whereas, Rick Forney is the Liaison for the local area chapter serving as the link between the patients, physicians, nurses, and the families. The Foundation provides educational materials including a comprehensive booklet, "GBS, an Overview for the Layperson," and newsletters as well as funding medical research and conducting symposia; and WHEREAS, the Foundations Medical Advisory board includes prominent neurologists active in GBS and CIDP research, leading physicians in rehabilitation medicine, and physicians who, themselves, have had the disorder. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Paul M. Mahoney, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM the month of MAY as "GBS/CIDP AWARENESS MONTH" in the County of Roanoke and encourage all citizens to recognize the importance of raising public awareness of GBS and CIDP Presented this 10th day of May 2022 Paul M. Mahoney, Chairman Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 10, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Joint work session with the Roanoke County Planning Commission to discuss Route 419 Town Center Design Guidelines SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside to hold a joint work session with the P lanning Commission to discuss the Route 419 Town Center Design Guidelines. Consultants Nick Britton of Michael Baker International and Mike Callahan of Renaissance Planning will be in attendance to review the attached PowerPoint presentation and answer any questions. ROANOKE COUNTY 419 TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES APRIL 2022 DRAFTPrepared for Roanoke County Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 2 419 TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES ROANOKE COUNTY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Philip Thompson • Roanoke County,Director of Planning Megan Cronise • Roanoke County, Transportation Planning Administrator Bailey Howard-DuBois • Roanoke County, Principal Planner (former) Rebecca James • Roanoke County, Zoning Administrator Alexander Jones • Roanoke County, Planner II Jill Loope • Roanoke County, Director of Economic Development Cecile Newcomb • Roanoke County, Planner II Cecelia Thomas• Roanoke County, Planning Administrative Assistant ABOUT GAP-TA The following study was conducted under a Growth and Accessibility Planning (GAP) technical assistance grant. Administered by Virginia’s Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI), GAP technical assistance projects seek to align infrastructure development with designated and emerging growth areas to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Visit vtrans.org/about/GAP-TA for information about the Growth and Accessibility Planning Technical Assistance program. CONTACT INFORMATION Philip Thompson Director of Planning 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov (540) 772 - 2065 The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI). OIPI does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers’ names that appear herein are solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report. Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 3 CONTENTS Introduction 6 Existing Zoning 7 Framework Plan 8 Site Planning 17 Building Design 23 Public Realm 26 Implementation 31 Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. 419 Town Center Framework Plan 9 Figure 2. Character District: Mixed Use 10 Figure 3. Character District: Town Center Core 11 Figure 4. Character District: Arterial Infill 12 Figure 5. Character District: Residential 13 Figure 6. Regional Greenway and Bicycle Connection Opportunities 16 Figure 7. Street Design for Mixed Use and Town Center Frontages 27 Figure 8. Street Design for Multimodal Thoroughfare Frontages 28 Figure 9. Street Design for Multimodal Thoroughfare Frontages 29 Table 1. Recommended Allowable Land Uses by District Type 14 LIST OF TABLES Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 5 GLOSSARY OR LIST OF ACRONYMS CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design GAP Growth and Accessibility Planning GIS Geographic information systems LID Low impact development OIPI Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment VDOT Virginia Department of Transportation Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 6 INTRODUCTION GAP Technical Assistance The following study was conducted under a Growth and Accessibility Planning (GAP) technical assistance grant. Administered by Virginia’s Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment (OIPI), GAP technical assistance projects seek to align infrastructure development with designated and emerging growth areas to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Organized under four program components, Roanoke County applied for planning assistance to explore improvements necessary to further the implementation of the 419 Town Center Plan. Purpose and Intent These design guidelines are proposed as an accompaniment to the 419 Town Center Plan to provide further guidance on the design of both public and private investments and improvements in the study area to help shape the built environment, meet community expectations, provide a vibrant public realm, and maintain a consistent character and high quality of design and aesthetic over the long-term future. Relationship to 419 Town Center Plan The 419 Town Center Plan provides a basic framework for the planning and development of the study area. In addition to laying out a foundation for land use, transportation, and sustainability, the Plan also presents a vision for the study area in terms of design character. However, that vision is necessarily broad, as it relates to different catalyst development areas, as well as existing neighborhoods and businesses, and the transitions from one to the other. As developers, investors, companies, institutions, and other stakeholders begin to participate in the study area’s evolution, they will be looking for the additional guidance provided by the design guidelines to execute projects that advance the 419 Town Center Plan vision. Guiding Principles While the creation and evolution of mixed-use development over time can involve many unknowns, there are several overarching guiding principles that should be followed as a basis for successful projects: Placemaking Natural topography and landscaping, as well as the context of the surrounding built form, should be considered during site design. Every site should be thought of as an opportunity to enhance the character and quality of the study area through thoughtful and appropriate design. Diversity of Uses and Densities Increasing the diversity and density of uses and facilities provides opportunities for activities and street presence at different times of the day and housing options for a wide range of individuals. Pedestrian Orientation Create pedestrian-friendly site design with direct walking and biking connections within the study area and to surrounding areas with pedestrian-oriented buildings, well-defined streetscapes, active ground floor uses and an interesting public realm. Flexible Transportation Network Creative solutions, such as shared parking, reduced parking requirements, and multimodal transportation facilities and opportunities, should be explored to reflect the less car-dependent nature of mixed-use development in the study area. Environmental Sustainability Reduce the environmental impacts of site design, building design, construction, and operation wherever possible by incorporating state-of-the-art “best practices”, green building techniques, recycling, and upcycling. 419 Town Center Plan (source: www.roanokecountyva.gov) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 7 EXISTING ZONING Existing Zoning Currently, the study area is a mix of both commercial and residential zoning districts. Approximately two-thirds (63 percent) of the land is zoned C2 (High Intensity Commercial), which includes a majority of the Electric Road corridor and the land along US 220 on the east side of the study area. The other commercial zone found in the study area is C1 (Low Intensity Commercial), which accounts for only four percent of the zoning and is found just north of Hunting Hills Drive. The remaining zoning in the district is residential, with R3 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential) accounting for 25 percent of the zoning in the study area and R4 (High Density Multifamily Residential) accounting for another eight percent. The R3 zoning is found entirely on the south side the study area on mostly undeveloped land in an area with significant topographical limitations. The R4 zoning is found in three spots: the South Peak development, Copper Croft Apartments, and the Windy Hill Key Apartments. Commercial Zoning Districts The C-1 Low-Intensity Commercial district aims to support the development of office and commercial spaces within the urban service area that will meet the needs of the community and county. They are located along arterial thoroughfares where there is existing commercial or residential development. They also serve as a buffer between different land-use types. The C2 High- Intensity Commercial district provides for the development of commercial and service-related uses in the urban service area for multiple neighborhoods or larger regions in the county. This district allows for a broad range of retail and service activities. The land uses of both the C1 and C2 districts are consistent with the land use recommendations in the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are established so that adjacent land uses are compatible. Residential Zoning Districts The purpose of the R3 Medium Density Multifamily Residential districts is to support the development of middle-high density residential areas of 6 to 12 units/acre in areas where this development is already existing and in areas that seem appropriate for this activity. The R4 High-Density Multifamily Residential District similarly supports the development of residential areas but for high densities of 12-24 units/acre. Both districts act as a buffer between less dense residential regions and more dense office, commercial, and industrial areas. The R3 and R4 districts promote different housing styles and densities to create a diverse design and layout. More dense developments in both districts have additional standards established for providing the appropriate amenities. The districts are appointed according to proximity to major streets, sewer systems, water systems, and schools that allow for development at a specified density. The site development regulations for these four districts include three categories: minimum lot requirements, minimum setback requirements, maximum height, and maximum coverage. The minimum lot requirements specify the necessary proximity to private wells, sewage disposal systems, public water systems. It also specifies lot size and density requirements. Setbacks are required for both principal and accessory structures in the front yard, side yard, and rear yard. These distances are included in the minimum setback requirements. Height limitations also exist for both the principal and accessory structures. Finally, the maximum coverage requirements include building coverage and lot coverage requirements. Building coverage is 50% for the C1 and C2 districts and 35% for the R3 and R4 districts. An aerial view of the Route 419 corridor at the Bernard Drive intersection Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 8 FRAMEWORK PLAN General The Framework Plan for the 419 Town Center study area (see Figure 1) is organized around an interwoven and loosely gridded street network that runs both parallel and perpendicular to SR 419. This proposed network, in conjunction with existing streets such as Ogden Road and Starkey Road, will form the nexus of the public realm and provide connectivity for residents, workers, and visitors alike. New streets will be narrower than those currently existing in the study area and more pedestrian-oriented, designed to slow vehicular traffic and encourage safe and efficient travel for all modes of movement. The Framework Plan reflects the vision of the 419 Town Center Plan; it represents desired locations and design for the street network with a goal of creating a more connected and walkable place. However, implementation of the Plan will occur over time and these design guidelines provide flexibility so that development proposals can respond to opportunities from both the public and private in terms of capital improvements, funding, and project design. Circulation and Connectivity The streets and blocks of the Framework Plan form a network that organizes activity within the public realm. Frequent intersections and mid-block pass-throughs provide numerous travel options and alternative routes, creating the basis for easy and efficient movement throughout the 419 Town Center study area. To encourage the development of a comfortable, walkable environment for visitors, pedestrian-oriented design should be encouraged. Block lengths should be around 300-400’ and any blocks over 500’ should provide mid-block crossings. To help break up larger blocks, street-front public spaces can be incorporated where possible. Larger blocks will also include pedestrian-only pass- throughs for increased access and parking will be located in the rear with vehicle access from alleys and service roads. Street Types Arterial Thoroughfares Thoroughfares support longer distance trips and connect the 419 Town Center area to the goods, services, recreation, and destinations of the larger region. Main Streets Main streets feature buildings oriented to the sidewalk or other public spaces such as plazas. They have a wide mix of land uses that prioritize ground floor retail with prominent entryways and windows, wide sidewalks, pedestrian activity, and open spaces that support gatherings and community events. General Urban Streets General urban streets support a wide mix of land uses and provide multimodal connections within the transportation network. Access/Service Streets Access/service streets provide access to parking areas, as well as the loading and service areas associated with business activities. Residential Streets Residential streets are flanked with single- and multi-family uses of varying sizes and densities, along with smaller scale neighborhood uses such as parks and churches. Public vs. Private Streets Public streets are preferred in the 419 Town Center area. However, private streets built to the standards described in these design guidelines may be appropriate, particularly on large parcels with a master plan for redevelopment or where specific site conditions dictate that public standards may not be able to be met. Character Districts General The 419 Town Center Plan proposes different development types and form within the study area based on the location, setting, and existing land uses. These different areas, called Character Districts, are described in more detail below. Mixed-Use District The Mixed-Use District (see Figure 2) includes customer-oriented retail and service uses, office, and residential uses in a pedestrian- priority environment. Mixed use development can be either vertical or horizontal. This district is primarily west of Route 419, with a small portion to the south on either side of Starkey Road. Town Center Core District The Town Center Core District (see Figure 3) is the most intense mixed-use area with the highest pedestrian-priority and most expansive public realm. This district is centered on the intersection of Starkey Road and Fallowater Lane. Arterial Infill District The Arterial Infill District (see Figure 4) provides smaller-scale commercial development and redevelopment opportunities along Route 419. This development will likely remain more auto-oriented given the frontage onto Route 419. Residential District The Residential District (see Figure 5) includes primarily housing, which may consist of single-family and/or multi-family development, along with adjacent open spaces for use by the residents. Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 9 Figure 1. 419 Town Center Framework Plan Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 10 Figure 2. Character District: Mixed Use Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 11 Figure 3. Character District: Town Center Core Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 12 Figure 4. Character District: Arterial Infill Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 13 Figure 5. Character District: Residential Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 14 Land Uses General Land uses for any parcel shall come from those indicated in Section 2.5.2 for the District applied to that parcel on the Framework Plan. A parcel located in more than one District may utilize the land uses allowed in the applicable Districts, provided the uses are compatible with surrounding development. Multiple uses may be appropriate within a single parcel, as described and/or shown on development plans. Similar and compatible uses not specifically listed in Section 2.5.2 may be allowed by staff upon review. Land Use District Town Center Core Mixed-Use Arterial Infill Residential RESIDENTIAL USES Home occupation x x Multi-family dwelling x x x Single Family Dwelling x Townhouse x x COMMERCIAL USES Bar/Nightclub x x x Bed and breakfast inn x Commercial indoor entertainment x x Communication services x x x Convenience store x x x Hospital x x x Hotel/motel/motor lodge x x x Mini-warehouses x Personal improvement services x x x Restaurant, drive-in, or fast food x x x x Restaurant, general x x x Retail Sales x x x Studio, fine arts x x x Land Use District Town Center Core Mixed-Use Arterial Infill Residential CIVIC USES Clubs (meeting facility)x x x x Community recreation x x x Cultural services x x Day care center x x x Educational facilities x x x x Public parks and recreational areas (parks/plaza)x x x Public parks and recreational areas (playground)x x x Religous Assembly x x x x Safety services x x x OFFICE USES Financial institutions x x x General offices x x x Laboratories x x x Medical Office x x x MISCELLANEOUS USES Parking Facility (deck/garage)x x Parking Facility (surface lot)x x x Transportation terminal x x x x Table 1. Recommended Allowable Land Uses by District Type Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 15 Open Space Network Open spaces should be located and designed to frame views and create a network of accessible public places that engage people in multiple ways. Trees will enhance the visual character of the urban environment and provide a streetscape that enhances walkability, buffers pedestrians from vehicular traffic, enriches the public realm, and visually frames architectural elements and entrances. Elements of the open space network are illustrated on the Framework Plan (see Figure 1). Open space should be a key social and gathering place element within the Town Center Core District and should be located within a ¼ mile radius walkshed of residential and office areas in other Districts. Stormwater Management Wherever possible, use stormwater capture, storage, and conveyance systems as an opportunity to provide additional design value to the landscape - facilities and ponds should have public access, be integrated as open space, and be connected to green spaces and trails where possible. Low Impact Development (LID) features for stormwater management are encouraged to use water as a resource. Multimodal Network Connectivity The 419 Town Center area is centrally located to several notable outdoor recreation assets within the Roanoke Valley. Strengthening the connections to these areas can help increase the attractiveness of the 419 Town Center over time as a place to live, work, and play. Development projects should work with the County to include design provisions that provide, extend or encourage pedestrian and bicycle connections and access to existing trails, parks, and urban spaces such as the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke River Greenway, Garst Mill Greenway, Tinker Creek Greenway, Mill Mountain Park and Greenway, River’s Edge Sports Complex, Starkey Park, Clearbrook Park, Explore Park, and other local parks and recreation centers. Figure 6 provides context for the study area within the larger region and its major multimodal networks. Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 16 Figure 6. Regional Greenway and Bicycle Connection Opportunities Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 17 SITE PLANNING Block Configuration A well-designed block network promotes pedestrian activity and encourages walking in place of driving for local trips by making connections between destinations accessible and convenient. Compact blocks facilitate an interconnected street network and provide the framework for mixed-use development and a greater diversity of building types within proximity. Increased street connectivity also disperses traffic flows, subsequently helping to transform the street into a comfortable space for pedestrians. Interconnected transportation networks provide advantages such as enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access, reduced traffic congestion, and more timely response for emergency vehicles. Shorter block lengths are encouraged, with a length of 250’ - 400’ in all directions where possible in the Town Center Core and 500’ or less in other Districts. This provides opportunities for multiple circulation routes and creates a finer-scaled and diverse pedestrian experience. Mid-block pass-throughs or plazas should be provided to facilitate pedestrian access to parking areas and surrounding uses and to create pedestrian gathering spaces, especially in areas where existing development creates larger blocks. This helps promote pedestrian activity and provide access to a variety of destinations. Use pedestrian amenities, such as curb extensions and textured paving to delineate key pedestrian crossing locations. One way that Roanoke County can develop walkability through block configuration is to encourage shorter block lengths, with a length of 250’-400’ in all directions, especially where possible in the Town Center Core. Districts outside of the town center core can be encouraged to have a block length of 500’ or less. Another element that can be considered are mid-block pass throughs or plazas that will facilitate pedestrian access to parking areas and surrounding uses and create pedestrian gathering spaces, especially in areas where existing development creates larger blocks. Building Location and Street Orientation Proper building location and orientation can reduce walking distances from the sidewalk and make streets more accessible for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders. Main building entries should border the primary streets that the building façade fronts to foster a vibrant, walkable environment. Buildings on corner lots may have a primary entrance facing the intersection. Secondary and residential entrances can be connected to interior courtyards and parking areas. Smaller blocks provide greater connection opportunities (source: https://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/) Primary building facades should front pedestrian-oriented streets (source: www.ccgreenbuildinc.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 18 Within the town center core, the site development review process can encourage the orientation of building frontage along a gridded network of internal streets, rather than the main roadways. For instance, in Mashpee, Massachusetts one way walkability was achieved in the Commons was through orienting the building frontage along a gridded network of internal streets, rather than the main roadways. Streets were required to have wide roadways and setbacks. To work around this, the landowner labeled the new internal roadway network, which brought walkability, as driveways and alleyways to design a more appropriate width that would accommodate pedestrians. Roanoke County can consider implementing a similar internal roadway network for increased walkability. In the mixed-use character district, buildings should help activate the sidewalk and the building frontage should contribute to the street’s character. Buildings are important in outlining the edge of the sidewalk. When sidewalks are narrow, Roanoke can consider setting back buildings to allow for sufficient pedestrian space. Building Entries Building entries should be clearly demarcated and accessible from the street and pedestrian corridors. They should be open, inviting, and highly visible. Entries should engage and activate the public realm. In mixed-use buildings, there should be a clear separation and hierarchy between retail storefronts and secondary entries for upper floor uses. Roanoke County can consider requiring main building entries to border the primary streets that the building facade fronts to foster a walkable environment. For residential districts, entrances can be connected to interior courtyards and parking areas. The building’s entries should activate the edge of the street. For the mixed-use character district, requirements should encourage a clear distinction between entries to retail and secondary entries to the upper floors. Loading and Service Areas Loading and service areas should be concealed from view within the building envelope or should be located to the rear of the site and designed for minimal visual impacts and circulation conflicts. When trash enclosures, loading docks, utility equipment, or similar uses are visible from a side street or neighboring property, they should be screened using materials, colors, and landscaping that complement the site design and building architecture. Utilities Utilities and equipment should be contained within buildings or located to minimize the visual and functional impact of systems and equipment on streets, sidewalks, and the public realm. Infrastructure should be consolidated where possible and integrated into adjacent development to be as inconspicuous as possible. Parking Parking can be a major factor limiting the walkability of a place. Providing an overabundance of parking encourages driving and, if located in front of buildings, may serve as a barrier between pedestrians and their destinations. Parking requirements should be reduced where possible and appropriate to reflect the walkable nature of mixed-use development proposed in the 419 Town Center Plan. Parking consolidation and cross-access is encouraged to reduce the number of access drives. Parking areas should be designed with a clear hierarchy of circulation for both vehicles and pedestrians. Building entries along sidewalks are easily accessible (source: https://i.pinimg.com) On-street parking enhances pedestrian-priority streets (source: https://arlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 19 Types Structured Parking Structured parking or parking garages are most appropriate in higher density mixed-use areas. They provide a reduced footprint and can fit well into an urban environment while maintaining scale and façade articulation. Garages should be located within block interiors wrapped by perimeter liner buildings or as standalone structures that can integrate first floor retail. The proportion, style, and massing of a garage should reflect that of surrounding buildings. Surface Parking Surface parking should be located to the rear of buildings wherever possible. Any off-street parking adjacent to the public right- of-way should be screened with landscaping or fencing, but in such a way that it does not create a barrier to adjacent sites or blocks. Long aisles of parking bays should be broken up with landscaped islands. Pedestrian access should be designed around the perimeter of on-site parking and between parking aisles. On-Street Parking On-street parking occurs within the right-of-way and is an important factor contributing to public realm activity and business vitality. Section 5.0 provides additional information regarding design of the public realm. Roanoke County can consider encouraging on-street parking and limiting requirements for off-street parking by allowing on-street parking spaces to contribute towards parking minimums. The county can also consider additional reductions to parking minimums throughout character districts. Roanoke County could also consider development of a parking garage, and using some sort of shared parking calculations, allowing developers to use the parking garage to meet some of their off-street parking needs. Additionally, Roanoke County should consider developing a new shared use parking worksheet that would allow developers to meet needed parking (if required due to financing regulations) while ensuring developments are not being overparked. Location Off-street parking should be located behind or beside buildings. Building facades that open directly onto the sidewalk without parking are more inviting to pedestrians. Shared Parking Shared parking allows neighboring land uses with different peak times for parking demand to use the same parking spaces. Wherever possible, shared parking should be provided for adjacent uses with staggered parking demands, to reduce the overall number of parking spaces required for multi-tenant or mixed-use buildings. Generally, the amount of parking required should be based on the maximum demand at any time across all land uses present. Roanoke County’s zoning can incentivize a decrease in the size of parking lots and encourage shared parking. The county can also consider building a parking garage as a way of meeting parking needs. Bicycle Parking Bicycle parking is a low cost yet effective way to encourage bicycling. Racks should be provided for short-term visitor parking and lockers should be provided for long-term visitor and/or employee parking. Bicycle racks should be located near building entrances or along direct paths to building entrances in highly visible areas but should not interfere with pedestrian access or be further from the building entrance than the nearest non-handicapped vehicle parking space. Innovative and creative bicycle rack designs should be encouraged, especially those that form a theme throughout the 419 Town Center area or complement building architecture. Bicycle lockers should be in secure, well-lit, covered areas. Bike parking requirements should be developed across the arterial infill, mixed-use, residential, and town-center core districts. This should include all public parking garages in the character districts. This would involve developing requirements for short-term and long-term bike parking. Roanoke County can consider implementing bike parking minimums that can be met through bike parking in the right-of-way or on-site. Along with bike parking, the county should also consider providing facilities such as a bicycle maintenance/repair station, especially for long-term parking spaces. Transitions Scale Compatible scale should be considered in terms of building dimensions, building placement, and orientation. Where practicable, similar sized buildings should face each other across local streets, but not to the detriment of achieving an appropriate mix of uses at the edges of Districts or neighborhoods. Transitions of development scale are best accomplished across rear lot lines, alleys, open space, or collector and arterial streets. New development should relate to other existing or proposed development on adjoining properties to maximize useful interconnection and shared efficiencies. Views Important views and vistas, both natural and man-made, should be used as opportunities to create edges or to align public spaces and corridors to enhance the quality of the public realm experience. Buffering and Screening Where incompatible scale or activities cannot be mitigated through adequate transitions, buffering and screening should be required. Buffering and screening strategies should consider building and parking placement, building orientation, walls, fencing, and landscaping. Bicycle parking encourages people to ride (source: https://cyclesafe.com) Top: Buildings with compatible scale (source: www.tndtownpaper.com); Middle: View lines can create interest (source: https://www.pinterest.com/); Bottom: Design with materials appropriate to the region and use (source: https://urbannext.net) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 20 Landscaping and Hardscaping Materials Plant materials should be selected that are appropriate for the regional climate and provide seasonal interest. Street trees should be deciduous – coniferous trees should not be used for this public realm feature. Decorative paving should be used to identify special areas of the streetscape such as intersections, pedestrian building entrances, crosswalks, and plazas and help differentiate functional zones on a sidewalk or street. Special pavement surfaces should be designed for urban traffic and meet the requirements set forth within the Americans with Disabilities Act. The use of permeable pavement systems is encouraged as appropriate. Roanoke County can consider emphasizing sustainable development methods for landscaping and hardscaping across character districts. A landscaping guide can be developed to promote water quality protection, thoughtful sustainable design, and native plant materials for landscaping and screening. Developers can also be required to complete a worksheet as a part of a landscaping plan that outlines how the project will include sustainable landscaping techniques. Requirements for the minimum percentage of landscaping can be developed for the character districts. For residential districts, landscaping can be used within common open space areas, and along the property’s perimeter to increase the visual appeal and outlook of residential units. For commercial districts, a minimum percentage of landscaping can also be developed for parking areas based on the number of parking spaces. Additionally, the county can encourage trees to be placed along the street right-of-way, entries, and focal points within commercial districts. Large trees can also be used to separate commercial uses from residential uses in areas where they might be adjacent. For mixed-use districts, landscaping is especially important within large parking areas, along the streetscape, and in common open spaces. Landscaping is beneficial in a mixed-use district as it can define and separate areas that allow these spaces to be more pedestrian-oriented. Screening The design and materials for walls and fences should be coordinated with the design and materials of nearby and adjacent buildings in terms of color, quality, scale, and detail. They should not necessarily be identical, but should be high quality, decorative rather than utilitarian, and be substantial in appearance appropriate with the urban environment. Rooftop mechanical equipment (except for solar panels) should be concealed from street-level public vantage points. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terms of color, shape, and size. Ladders for roof access should be hidden and/or integrated into the building design. If the developer proposes a landscape screening, the screening plan can be included in the developer’s landscape plan to ensure screening requirements are met. This can include screening for trash bins, mechanical equipment, parking areas, and existing screening. Service Areas Service and utility areas should be concealed as much as possible from the public view by employing means such as enclosing walls, fences, screening and/or landscaping of sufficient height, structure, and density for year round cover to provide an opaque screen. Safety and Security Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) measures, as appropriate, to provide safer environments. CPTED measures should use elements of the environment to control access, provide opportunities to see and be seen, define ownership, and encourage the maintenance of territory. [Note: reference www.safenow.org for additional CPTED information.] Exterior Lighting General Lighting has a strong effect on the character of a place. This includes both the distribution of the light and the character of the fixture/ pole itself. A variety of lighting types should be used to address the different needs of civic spaces, pedestrian-oriented streets, buildings, and parking areas. Exterior lighting for pedestrian areas should be provided at all points of decision such as intersections, crossings, steps, and arrival points. It should illuminate pedestrian pathways, drives, buildings, signage, landscaping, and other appropriate areas. All lighting should be aimed, located, designed, fitted, and maintained so as not to present a hazard to drivers or pedestrians by impairing their ability to safely traverse and so as not to create a nuisance through light trespass. Lighting design should implement energy conservation, including automatic cut-off controls, and maintain dark skies. [Note: reference www.darksky.org for additional information from the International Dark Sky Association.] Site, building, and parking lighting fixtures should be coordinated and compatible with the architecture of adjacent buildings and streetscape. Simpler fixture styles are recommended to be compatible with different architectural styles. Exterior lighting on private property is typically handled through zoning ordinance, whether generally speaking (applicable to all types of development) or with regulations specific to certain types of land uses (e.g., outdoor recreation or parking structures). Regulations tend to focus on mitigating the impact of lighting on neighboring properties, the extent and brightness of the lights, or the height of freestanding light poles. Specific design elements can be evaluated and approved through any number of other processes, such as planned development review or additional regulations via overlay districts. Further, the code could be modified to address lighting, but this would then apply to all other properties with the same zoning. For a development review process, Roanoke County may want to consider putting together a primer on lighting techniques, guidelines, and/or requirements if lighting requirements for the 419 Town Center districts are going to be different than other areas of the county. For example, Dutchess County, New York, has a primer on LED lighting for site plan review that outlines all the parameters they consider when looking at lighting plans (link). Street Streetlights are used for overall illumination of roadways and sidewalks and should enhance security of the street while minimizing negative impacts on private properties. They should be pedestrian scale and apply adequate illumination for both pedestrian use of the sidewalk and street, and vehicular use of the street. Placement of fixtures should provide a coordinated and organized appearance that contributes to the overall continuity of areas. Lighting influences design character (source: www.designplan.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 21 Generally, all streetlights should be located to provide safe clearance for pedestrians and adjacent vehicles. The setback for each pole from the curb edge should be consistent to create visual alignment. Poles should be intentionally placed in relation to on-street parking spaces to prevent conflicts with vehicle doors. Streetlights should be spaced consistently based on the width of the street and the length of the given block. Mature tree canopies should be considered when spacing streetlights and should be centered between trees whenever feasible. Spacing should strive to achieve a consistent look. Building Building lighting design should highlight primary building entrances, light specific usable exterior spaces such as balconies or terraces, complement adjacent streetscapes, and accentuate adjacent plazas and open spaces. Building lighting should be integrated into the architecture through concealment or through materials, detailing, form, and spacing that complements the building elements. Building lighting fixtures, whether exposed or concealed, should not have power sources, conduit runs, junction boxes, or other unfinished elements exposed to view. Architectural accent lighting should be limited to indirect lighting only. Building Signs Illuminated signs should be oriented to the public right-of-way and should avoid facing residential uses and publicly accessible open spaces or plazas whenever practical. They should have tops to prevent light from escaping upward. Pulsating, flashing, running or rotating lights are generally not compatible with pedestrian-oriented areas and should be avoided. Power sources, conduit runs, junction boxes, or other unfinished elements should be concealed to minimize their visual impact. Open Space Open space lighting should create a comfortable and safe nighttime ambience in publicly accessible open spaces and plaza areas and provide continuity of light levels with adjacent streetscapes. It should provide the lowest levels necessary to achieve safety and efficient wayfinding. Appropriate elements of plazas such as gazebos, art, and fountains should be highlighted to aid in orientation, provide visual interest, and become an inviting nighttime presence. Pedestrian lighting may be used to illuminate primary walking pathways or accented paved areas. Illumination sources that are low to the ground or integral with pavement such as bollards and walkway lights are encouraged. High power and general illumination of entire open spaces from remotely mounted fixtures are strongly discouraged. Parking Areas Parking areas should include adequate lighting levels to create a safe and secure environment. Fixtures should be installed at illumination levels to provide safety for vehicles and pedestrians, while minimizing glare or spillage onto adjacent properties. The entrances and exits to parking areas should be well lit. Poles should be placed to provide a unified, organized appearance throughout the parking area and provide reasonably even and uniform light distribution without hot spots or dark spots. Accent Accent lighting should highlight appropriate design elements. It may be either ground mounted or mounted on buildings, and light levels should be low or background in appearance. Flood lighting is prohibited. Landscape lighting should be subtle and should be carefully shielded to avoid view of the source. Up lighting of landscaping should be limited to a select few elements and should be designed to minimize sky glow. Signage General Signage helps identify places, provide direction, and advertise businesses. Along with communicating that information, signage should be used across the study area to establish a consistent character and reinforce the sense of place. Roanoke County may want to consider developing a wayfinding signage system that will provide directional information for transportation modes to public facilities, businesses, and points of interest across character districts and especially within the Town Center Core. Directional signage will allow people to identify the Town Center and draw them toward the area. A consistent way-finding design will be important throughout the character districts. This can be regulated in the site development review process which should take into consideration the gateway, area, site/building, and materials/design elements. Light fixtures should be pedestrian-scale and complement design character of the street (source: https://harriman.com) Signage helps create sense of place (source: www.imoveisnadisney.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 22 Gateway Gateways serve to announce arrival to the study area. Their main purpose is to create a sense of place and boundary. Gateways not only serve as an introduction to the area itself, but to the style, mood, and branding of the 419 Town Center and the primary visual elements of the streetscape and architecture. The county can consider encouraging the construction of entry and directional signage to help identify entrance/gateways to the Residential district. These signs should be clearly visible to both pedestrians and automobile traffic. Area Public signage can serve to announce arrival into a special destination. This is particularly significant at intersections that serve as gateways to a District or transitions between Districts. Signs and their text should be scaled for legibility by both pedestrian and automobile traffic. Site and Building The size, location, and design of site and building signage should relate to the location and character of the building. Monument signage should be placed along the road with the purpose of identifying entry and/or commercial tenants. Primary building- mounted signage is intended to direct vehicular traffic, while secondary building-mounted signage is intended to be smaller in size and provide direction for pedestrians. Signage should be located so that it reinforces an orientation to the primary street on which the buildings are located. Materials and Design Based on the speed of the viewer, sign materials and design may vary from simple to more complex. Signs oriented toward higher speed vehicles should use simple colors and text so that they can be easily understood from a distance. Pedestrian-oriented signs, or those viewed at slower speeds, may incorporate multiple colors, sign shapes, varying and smaller fonts, as well as images and other design elements. Sign materials and design should be proportional and compatible with building architecture. Signs with movable text or electronic messaging signs, signs with movable parts, tall mast signage, over-scaled signage, and blinking signs are strongly discouraged. Roanoke County can encourage partnerships with local artists to develop the design for the wayfinding system. Public Art General Public art and cultural amenities are strongly recommended throughout the study area to establish identity, stimulate public spaces, and celebrate regional history and the local art community. They enrich the physical environment and are an investment in placemaking. Public art and cultural amenities come in many forms - sculptures, paintings, murals, mosaics, pavement treatments, banners, and even landscapes or earthwork. Roanoke County can encourage developers to contribute to Roanoke’s public art through building permit applications or as part of a development review points system (see Implementation). Applications for construction or building improvements for multi-dwelling, mixed-use, or non-residential developments that have a construction value of more than a certain value could be required to contribute a certain percentage of the costs to a public art fund specifically for 419 Town Center area. The location of the artwork should be carefully considered. Public art should be located in an area clearly visible and easily accessible to the public. The county should consider implementing a design review process that will evaluate the artwork’s design, the location, and the artist’s qualifications. The application could also include a maintenance plan along with the final design of the artwork for approval. The location of the artwork should also be identified on the site plan, development plan, and other related documents for the approval process. Location Public art should be placed in highly visible locations, such as centers of open spaces, along walkways, at building approaches and entries, and as the terminus to roads and/or viewsheds. Design Considerations Any art piece introduced into the public realm should be constructed of durable materials, easily maintained, free of safety hazards, and located to maintain clearances (both vertically and horizontally) with pedestrian walk spaces. Art installations liven public spaces (source: https://i.pinimg.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 23 BUILDING DESIGN Build-to Lines and Setbacks Building setbacks should be regulated to reinforce the desired District character and streetwall. Minimal front setbacks are recommended to encourage pedestrian activity along the sidewalk. Building entries that border main streets and public thoroughfares foster vibrant, walkable streetscapes and allow for clear pedestrian access and circulation. Wider setbacks may be used where necessary for outdoor seating, on-street markets, courtyards, or plazas. In mixed-use or high- density residential areas, minimal side setbacks and/or use of party walls help reinforce pedestrian activity. In less intense areas, larger setbacks may be suitable, especially when residential uses are on the first floor. Where build-to lines apply, at least 70 percent of the primary building façade and 50 percent of the secondary building facade should be maintained within those limits. The remaining façade may be set back to allow amenities such as outdoor seating, plazas, landscaping, and art. Lot Coverage Lot coverage helps control the scale and massing of a building and ensures that a given parcel, and its adjacent parcels, have suitable access to sunlight and air. The maximum lot coverage by a building footprint should not exceed 75 percent of the overall lot area. Mass, Form, and Scale Mass Massing describes the physical form and shape of a building or group of buildings. Massing should be compatible with surrounding buildings to create a streetscape that maintains a consistent scale while allowing unique articulation between and within buildings. Building location and frontage should generally match that of adjacent structures to create a unified streetscape. However, breaking the established pattern of spacing and building form of a street wall may be used to emphasize a circulation pathway or a transition to a different use. Front facades should avoid monotonous and plain facades and instead be divided into modular bays with widths of approximately 25 to 50 feet to reflect a small-scale street frontage; variations should incorporate elements to help break down the mass of the façade wall, limit blank walls, and help reduce its apparent scale at the pedestrian level. These elements include recesses and projections of the wall plane; entryways or storefront windows; changes in texture, material, or color; arcades; and balconies. Blank walls on other facades should be avoided by incorporating treatments that use colors, materials, landscape, or openings to create interest. Form The ground floor should be defined by architectural features that help to enhance the pedestrian space and provide a comfortable sense of scale, or landscape materials such as street trees and foundation planting. Retail spaces should have a ground-floor entryway fronting the public street and visible to pedestrians, and transparent storefront windows that integrate the interior space with street activity. At least 70 percent of the ground floor façade of retail spaces should be devoted to transparent windows and/or doors. Glass shall be clear to allow a view through to the sales floor for customers to easily see whether the shop is open and to entice shoppers with merchandise. Scale Variations in height, horizontal divisions, window treatments, and façade materials should be used to create façade articulation and break up the perceived mass of a building, relate it to the scale of a pedestrian, and provide appropriate transitions. Outdoor spaces add interest to the streetwall (source: www.bostonmagazine.com) Site design and form should complement surrounding buildings (source: https://www.realestaterama. com/) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 24 Facade Treatments/Articulation and Composition Building facades are the interface between the public street and the building interior. The placement and size of the façade elements is critical to the way a building is perceived in its scale and character. In general, the larger the expanse of blank wall on a building, the larger the structure appears to be to the pedestrian on the street, thus limiting the desirability to walk along these blocks. At the scale of an entire block, building widths, recesses, and storefronts should generally be uniformly spaced and scaled to create visual unity in the street wall. At the scale of a building façade, form and aesthetics should be established through the repetition of elements such as windows, columns, recesses and projections, color, and materials. Building facades may be vertically articulated to identify a base, body, and a top. The floor-to-ceiling height of the ground floor should be greater than that of upper floors to accommodate retail space where permitted. Upper stories may be slightly set back from the ground floor and treated with different materials and colors to reinforce the contrast with the base of the building. A single, unarticulated building mass should be avoided. The middle portion of a building should have evenly spaced bays of windows, reflecting either a residential or office use. The top of a building may be defined by roof form, eaves, and cornices. Character and Materials All buildings should be constructed or clad with materials that are durable, economically maintained, and of a quality that will retain their appearance over time. Variations in materials and colors are important for creating a vibrant and interesting streetscape. All sides of a building visible from the public street should have a consistency in architectural detail and character. Colors should be skillfully used to complement building architecture and contribute to the façade articulation along the street wall. Entryways, openings, roof trim, and other architectural details should be highlighted with a change in texture and color. Colors should be compatible with other buildings in the area. Color and texture for architectural finishes should be selected to provide visual unity. Entry Locations Building entries that border main streets and other urban streets help to create vibrant, walkable streetscapes and provide clear pedestrian access and circulation. The primary building entrance should be oriented toward the principal pedestrian accessway, typically the public sidewalk or an interior sidewalk where the majority of pedestrian traffic is expected to be coming from within the site. Additional entrances should be oriented towards on-site parking or outdoor gathering areas. Vertical Step-Backs Buildings exceeding 35’ in height in Mixed-Use Districts should maintain no more than three floors without horizontal moderation in the vertical surface plane to reduce the perception of building mass from the street and allow sunlight into the public realm. A step-back should be provided above the third floor, which may serve as a balcony or outdoor living space for residential or office uses. The step-back should occur on the building side facing the primary street but may also be added on building sides facing residential neighborhoods. The step-back should be between 8’ and 12’ in depth from building face to building face. Façade articulation adds interest and scale (source: https://i.pinimg.com) Vertical step-backs reduce the perception of building mass (source: https:cdnassets.hw.net) Building entries should be easily identified and accessed from pedestri- an walkways (source: https://bdcnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 25 Rooftop Details Roofline ridges and parapets should not run unbroken for more than 75-feet. Roof-mounted utility and communication equipment shall be screened from view by structural features that are an integral part of the building’s architectural design. Where practical, rooftops are encouraged to accommodate usable outdoor space, including sun decks, seating areas, roof gardens, outdoor cafes, grilling areas, or recreation areas. Green/Sustainable Design Green building techniques and renewable energy infrastructure should be incorporated into both site and building design to encourage the efficient use of energy, water, waste reduction, and construction materials. Rooftops can be used for a variety of activities (source: https://i.pinimg.co Green building elements can be integrated into all areas of site design (source: www.craftontull.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 26 PUBLIC REALM Context Zones General Successful public realm design provides efficient movement for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. Street function and appearance, balanced with the design of the built environment, creates a pleasant and safe experience for travelers, residents, and business owners. An interconnected street network disperses vehicle traffic, allowing for narrower streets and a more comfortable pedestrian environment. In general, the design of the public realm can help to define and enhance the overall character of the study area. The public realm adjacent to building frontages is the primary area of occupation by the pedestrian and, as such, has significant power to shape the walking experience. It should provide a comfortable, attractive, and maintainable environment that encourages pedestrian use, reinforces movement and activity, and promotes coordination and access with private sector investments. Frontage conditions are key to establishing the mixed-use and walkable character envisioned in the 419 Town Center Plan. Context zones will vary by District, street type, pedestrian activity level, and the speed and volume of traffic. The public realm is shown in Figures 7 – 9 and described in more detail below. The cross-sections shown provide general configurations and minimum dimensions for streetscape elements; however, these elements will vary depending on street type, location, and purpose. Although the Thoroughfare Frontage Street Design (see Figure 9) indicates that the shown cross-section does not apply to Route 419, it should be noted that potential changes to Route 419 west of Starkey Road have been discussed by the County. These enhancements could potentially include a cross-section with two travel lanes each direction and a buffered bike lane, with a landscaped strip separating sidewalks from the roadway. Building Frontage Zone The building frontage zone is the space directly adjacent to buildings, often located within the building setback. This area affects how buildings relate to both pedestrians and motorists. When this zone is small, pedestrians interact with the buildings more easily. Buildings that are closer to the sidewalk are easier to enter. Windows close to the sidewalk invite pedestrians to look in. This zone can include space for street activities like café tables, sidewalk sales, and other extensions of building activity. These activities should be kept within the building frontage zone and should not encroach on the space for the pedestrian through zone. The building frontage zone may also be a landscaped area that provides a separation between the sidewalk and the entrance area to the building. Pedestrian Through Zone The pedestrian through zone is the space where pedestrians walk. It is one of the most important elements contributing to an active and vibrant streetscape and should be free of obstacles and accessible to all users. Promoting a walkable environment requires safe and connected sidewalks that unite the pedestrian with their desired destination or activity. Furnishing Zone The furnishing zone acts as a buffer between moving traffic and pedestrians on the sidewalk. It includes a planting strip for street trees or has trees in grates. It may also contain street furniture, bicycle racks, utilities, wayfinding, and other elements. The design and location of furniture should be visually coordinated and support its function; often, street furniture can be consolidated in high use areas to keep them from being obstacles for pedestrians. Street trees should be aligned with breaks in on-street parking or delineations of spaces to avoid conflicts with vehicle loading and unloading. Curb Zone The curb zone provides a clear distance from the back of curb to streetscape elements to avoid conflicts with vehicle doors and mirrors. Roadway Zone The roadway zone is the space between curb lines (or edges of asphalt pavement). It includes the vehicle travel lanes, bus lanes, bike lanes, on-street parking spaces, and medians. Intersection Zones Corner Clear Zone: This intersection zone is an obstruction-free space between the curb and the lines created by extending the inside sidewalk line to the curb face. Priority use of this zone shall be for curb ramps, accessible pedestrian signals, and other pedestrian call buttons. Corner clear zones accommodate the higher pedestrian volumes that congregate at intersections and provide safe viewing sightlines for both pedestrians and motorists. Corner Public Use Zone: This zone is the portion of the furnishings zone immediately adjacent to the corner clear zone generally designed for public utilities and signs, including fire hydrants, traffic signals, streetlights, and service cabinets. Corner clear zones provide pedestrian visibility (source: https://rdgusa.com) An active public realm encourages pedestrian activity (source: www.designworkshop.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 27 Figure 7. Street Design for Mixed Use and Town Center Frontages Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 28 Figure 8. Street Design for Multimodal Thoroughfare Frontages Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 29 Figure 9. Street Design for Multimodal Thoroughfare Frontages Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 30 Open Spaces General Open space is a broad classification for public spaces. Carefully planned open space is necessary for the richness of mixed-use development and the vitality of the public realm. The scale, enclosure, and density of the surrounding urban environment determine the appropriate type of open space - areas designed as outdoor rooms that can be used for play, recreation, social interaction, and/ or cultural activities. Types Plaza: The most formal public space, a plaza is generally less than half the size of a block and often located at the intersection of important thoroughfares. It is devoted to civic uses and commercial activity and surrounded by buildings on most sides. Its landscape is composed primarily of durable pavement and formally planted trees. Features such as fountains, statues, and other vertical elements help mark the civic prominence of the plaza. These features are most successful when planned in accordance with a strong visual axis, allowing the plaza to be seen from a distance. Urban Park: An urban park may occupy a full urban block. Its landscape consists of lawns, paved walks, and shade trees. Formal fountains and public art are often incorporated. Landscape elements can help to organize the park into a series of smaller spaces that offer diverse qualities and uses. Urban parks may be surrounded by civic buildings or residential uses. Urban parks provide an excellent terminus for greenways and bicycle routes originating outside the area. In most cases, it is appropriate to frame the park with a visual axis. Pocket Park: A pocket park is a small park that often occupies an undeveloped space between buildings. Typically, no longer than one hundred feet of frontage, pocket parks provide vegetation, shade, and open space within commercial or mixed-use areas. Due to their small scale, pocket parks predominantly serve immediately adjacent buildings. These small, informal breaks in the urban fabric provide alternatives to more prominent civic spaces. Neighborhood Park: A neighborhood park is an open public space serving a residential area. The space may be used for either (or both) passive and active recreation. Neighborhood parks provide a safe open area free from moving traffic for children and other neighborhood residents. They may be bound by residences or small-scale institutional or civic buildings to form a common green. Where possible, they should be tied into trail networks. Location Public spaces should be located in visually prominent, accessible, and safe locations that promote year-round activity in both day and evening hours. Scattered green features that do not relate to each other or create connections within the public realm should be avoided. Design Considerations Well-shaped public spaces help create meaningful places for people to gather and contribute to an inviting pedestrian environment that connects different Districts within the study area. Design elements to consider while creating open spaces includes: §Design open space to maximize circulation opportunities between adjacent uses and/or areas. §Where possible, open spaces should be designed to take advantage of prevailing breezes in the summer and sun in the winter. Provide filtered shade by using deciduous trees that reduce temperatures in summer and allow sun in winter. §Open spaces are the places where people gather to relax and socialize. The most important element in encouraging use is through seating. Provide a variety of seating locations in both shaded and sunny areas that accommodates the needs of various users. Place seating where sitters can watch passersby. At least half of seating options should be secondary, in the form of steps, planter seats, retaining walls, grass mounds, or other site features. Open spaces can provide recreation for children and families (Source: https:// cityviking.com/) Open spaces can host community events (https://www.visitroanokeva.com/) Open spaces provide areas for social gathering (source: https://i.pinimg.com) Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 31 IMPLEMENTATION Context These design guidelines provide a framework to ensure that the implementation of projects within the study area will be of a high design quality and character. Ultimately, they are about helping provide consistency and preserving investments. These guidelines are not intended to supplant existing policies and procedures regarding planning and development, but instead to provide additional guidance and flexibility to help both public and private projects achieve the vision of the 419 Town Center Plan. Phasing Depending on market conditions, development and/or redevelopment may occur in multiple Districts at the same time. Independent projects should be designed and built to ensure that, at completion, there are no unsafe or unsightly temporary conditions and that pedestrian connections to and through the project are maintained and/or restored, and functionality of vehicle access and circulation is maintained. Public Realm Design Figures 7-9 illustrate typical cross-sections to achieve the public realm associated with each District for the desired character and land uses. However, some existing streets may not fit these templates; in those cases, easements beyond the limits of existing rights-of-way may be required to achieve the desired design elements. Mall Retrofit Tanglewood Mall may, over time, be redeveloped with mixed-use development and outdoor public spaces. Key design elements that should be considered during this conversion include: §Place new mixed-use buildings on corners and along street edges to hide parking lots and create a well-defined public realm. §Convert primary parking aisles into internal streets to better balance the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. §Maintain a walkable block size (no more than 500 feet). §Connect adjacent parking lots to avoid unnecessary curb cuts. §Prioritize entrances from Route 419 to reduce excess turning movements and reduce curb cuts. Private Sector Participation The strategies listed below are intended to encourage and facilitate the creation of high quality private development and investment in the study area through implementation of the design guidelines: Outreach to developers and lenders Sharing these design guidelines with the development community can provide benefits in two ways. First, the guidelines help create policy transparency by clearly laying out County expectations for the overall development character and form that is desired for projects in the study area. This helps developers and their lenders know what will be expected of them as they begin projects and allows them to plan for these expectations ahead of time. Second, the guidelines can help investors in a project understand that there is a community vision and commitment to quality building so that future development can protect prior investments made in the study area by ensuring a consistent design character. Educating Potential Developers The type of mixed-use development shown on the 419 Town Center Plan is often a fairly new concept, and some developers may be unfamiliar with the specific details of these design concepts. It will likely be necessary to promote these concepts with developers to familiarize them on the opportunities they represent and the differences with traditional suburban development practices. The illustrations and narrative in the 419 Town Center Plan will be useful in introducing these concepts and telling the story of these development opportunities. Public Sector Participation The strategies listed below include some of the ways that the public sector can incorporate the intent of the design guidelines into public projects and policies: Modifying Policy Existing regulatory policy may contain requirements that unintentionally present barriers to the development form proposed for the study area, such as excessive setbacks, separation of individual land uses, or overparking. The design guidelines can be used as a basis for reviewing and updating current development codes and standards to make sure policies are aligned with the intent of the 419 Town Center Plan. Aiding Development Review The design guidelines can be shared with developers or applicants at the pre-application stage of a project so that the design intent of the 419 Town Center Plan is clearly expressed up front. Subsequently, they should be used as a resource by County staff in reviewing development projects to ensure that the design character and details of the project have carried that intent forward. Supporting Public/Private Improvement Projects The guidelines can be used to support public/private initiatives by providing a unifying framework for the quality and design character of improvements in these projects and informing the overall site planning, building design, and siting of improvements to ensure a harmonious character of individual projects within the study area. Providing Funding Opportunities and Capital Investments Funding improvements in the study area will likely require multiple revenue sources and planning for different work programs within multiple time periods. By having the Framework Plan available as a resource, it may allow the County to piggyback projects or take advantage of unexpected opportunities that arise over time. County investment in the 419 Town Center area will be crucial to its success. Public streets with wide right of ways currently dedicated to vehicles that can be reallocated to the pedestrian realm should be an early priority. Starkey Road between 419 and Ogden Drive is an early opportunity to implement the intention of the 419 Town Center plan. Rebuilding this segment of road as a complete street that is prepared to accommodate the type of walkable future development envisioned in the 419 Town Center will demonstrate the County’s commitment to the area. Future opportunities to site County facilities – such as administrative offices, libraries, structured parking facilities, and public parks – are also key investments that will support redevelopment. Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 32 Zoning and Policy Considerations & Recommendations There are three general approaches to codifying a set of design guidelines, particularly when those guidelines are intended to apply to a limited zoning district and/or geographic area. Each method has unique benefits and limitations that impact the approach the County and developers must take in order to develop properties. Those general approaches are implementation of overlay districts, development review standards, and adoption of policies that encourage more by-right development. Overlay Districts Use of overlay districts is a regulatory tool that creates a special zoning district that is placed “over” an existing base zone. This overlying zone identifies special provisions in addition to those in the underlying base zone. This strategy is most commonly used when there are specific needs in certain areas that require additional regulation that would not apply to the same uses elsewhere. Overlay zones based on floodplain proximity or topography are common and they don’t change the uses that are allowed but they may change how those uses are developed. Overlay zones, however, also allow jurisdictions to add additional regulations to base zones that are based more on character or neighborhood-specific goals. Regulations that may be included in this type of overlay could relate to lighting, signage, or parking, for example. Roanoke County has employed overlay districts in the past. A majority of the overlay districts are based on practical needs, such as the AO Airport Overlay District and the FO Floodplain Overlay District. However, there is a character-based overlay district for the Clearbrook Village (the CVOD district). However, based on conversations with County staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors, there is little appetite for using overlay districts to implement the 419 Town Center Plan. Planned Development/Development Review One strategy for implementation is the creation of a specialized planned development process for all development within the 419 Town Center boundaries. This would require every development with the district to go through a specific planning review. This would also require the establishment of new zoning districts that require that additional review to ensure it is limited to the 419 Town Center area. While this would introduce an additional administrative burden on Roanoke County, it has the benefit of providing the County some regulatory control over elements that are not required elsewhere in the County without the need of an overlay district. It would also provide an opportunity for the County to offer developers some flexibility in how they approve the development because they can use the additional level of review to introduce some type of scoring or points system for development. In essence, a developer can provide certain desired elements that are not explicitly required by code in exchange for modifications to other regulations. The incentives will make a significant difference in how a program like this would work. The goal is to ensure that there is a continuum of possibilities in how new developments are designed. There are the regulatory requirements which meet the minimum goals of the district and the resulting development will be consistent with the goals of the 419 Town Center Master Plan. However, the desired outcome is to encourage developers to go beyond the regulatory requirements. For this reason, the incentives need to be carefully thought out and balanced with the district goals. Further, there needs to be some equivalence between the exemptions or exceptions being requested and the additional steps being taken by the developer. One method of implementing a review system like this is to “score” developments based on certain factors. When a development proposal comes in, the project is automatically scored based on adherence to the regulations and then rewarded additional points for certain elements of the proposal that may go above and beyond the minimum regulations. Developments that score over a certain value can be approved administratively without additional input from the Planning Commission. Developments with scores that fall under that threshold would be required to go to Planning Commission to ensure that there is some consistency between what is being asked for (incentive program usage, modification to the requirements) and what is being included with the proposal. By-Right A third option for implementation is to establish new zoning districts where a majority of the development that is desired is allowed by-right. This would certainly make the new zoning districts more appealing for developers as it introduces far more flexibility in the process of design and site development. This approach can be applied to uses, setbacks, heights, and any other characteristics of development; further, certain elements can be receive by-right treatment in favor of additional regulations in other areas. Streamlining the zoning, however, makes it difficult to administer multiple goals and provides little opportunity for phasing or other tiered or stepped approaches. Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines 33419 Town Center Design Guidelines GROWTH AND ACCESSIBILITY PLANNING (GAP) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM May 10, 2022 Roanoke County 419 Town Center Design Guidelines Roanoke County Board of Supervisors/Planning Commission Work Session •Introductions •Background •Engagement •Key Design Principles •Regional Greenway Opportunities •419 Town Center Framework Plan •Street Design •Character Districts •Design Intent •Regulatory Framework and Implementation •Questions 2 AGENDA •Funding for project through the Virginia Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment’s (OIPI) GAP-TA program •Project Goals: •This project has been about implementation support. •Translate the vision & plan into design guidelines that shape development and inform updates to Roanoke County’s development codes. •Outcomes: •Recommendations for an approach to zoning/development code for the area 3 BACKGROUND •September 7 •Board of Supervisors Work Session •September 20 •Planning Commission Work Session •March 10 •Public open house 4 ENGAGEMENT 1.Safe travel for people of all ages and abilities 2.Connected streets and short blocks 3.Building forms and streetscapes that create vibrant places 4.Mix of land uses and densities 5.Strive for a "park once" walkable districts 5 KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES REGIONAL GREENWAY OPPORTUNITIES 419 TOWN CENTER FRAMEWORK PLAN STREET DESIGN STREET DESIGN STREET DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICTS CHARACTER DISTRICTS CHARACTER DISTRICTS CHARACTER DISTRICTS DESIGN INTENT 1.Integration of vertical and horizontal mix of land uses. 2.Scaled to create a functional, walkable, pedestrian-friendly urban environment. 3.Compact development with access to public gathering and open spaces. 4.Spaces for local community events and daily socializing. Site design and form should complement surrounding buildings (source: https://www.realestaterama.com/) Smaller blocks provide greater connection opportunities (source: https://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/) DESIGN INTENT 1.Sustainable development that reduces consumption of land, energy, and resources. 2.Distinctive and attractive architecture that encourages creativity and diversity. 3.Environmental best practices, including green building elements. 4.Coordinates a variety of development strategies to accommodate both short-and long-term transitions. Green building elements can be integrated into all areas of site design (source: www.craftontull.com) An active public realm encourages pedestrian activity (source: www.designworkshop.com) Open spaces can provide recreation for children and families (Source:https://cityviking.com/) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION •Look at phasing implementation of zoning regulations based on: •Regulation type: prioritize certain elements to “launch” in first phase •Geographic area/district type: Certain areas of the study area may be ready before others •Consider developer feedback, market conditions, anchor uses •Private sector and public sector participation •Look at priorities •What can be done in base zoning or by-right? •Planned Development / Development Review Process •Creation of a tiered system of review •Gives staff and/or Planning Commission some flexibility in how design guidelines apply based on developer buy-in •Allows for a menu of incentives for developers to use Contact Us Nick Britton –jnick.britton@mbakerintl.com Mike Callahan –mcallahan@citiesthatwork.com QUESTIONS Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment 1221 E. Broad Street, 2nd Floor Richmond, VA 23219 GAP-TA@vtrans.org Visit vtrans.org/about/GAP-TA for information about the Growth and Accessibility Planning Technical Assistance Program Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.