HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/22/2019 - RegularPage 1 of 5
INVOCATION:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG
Disclaimer:
“Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting
shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the
Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been
previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent
the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of
the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such
decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of
the Board.”
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
October 22, 2019
Page 2 of 5
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for October 22, 2019. Regular meetings
are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at
7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be
announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of
Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at
www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are closed-captioned, so it is important for
everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require
assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors
meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in
advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES
1. Roll Call
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of Cmdr. Raymond Torres for receiving the International Association
of Chiefs of Police (IACP) 40 under 40 Award (Howard B. Hall, Chief of Police)
2. Proclamation recognizing November 2019 as National Adoption Month and
November 23, 2019, as National Adoption Day in the County of Roanoke (Ben
Jones, Family Services Supervisor)
D. BRIEFINGS
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
October 22, 2019
Page 3 of 5
E. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING
ORDINANCE-CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate
support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies
procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after
recommendation by the Planning Commission:
1. The petition of Fellowship Community Church to rezone property to remove the
proffered conditions and to obtain a special use permit for a religious assembly
on approximately 3.50 acres zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial, District
with conditions, located near the 6500 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District
2. The petition of Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to obtain a special use permit
for a sanitary landfill on approximately 8.05 acres zoned AG -3, Agricultural/Rural
Preserve, District and to amend the special use permit for an existing sanitary
landfill (Smith Gap Landfill) on approximately 886.80 acres zoned AG -3S,
Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District with a special use permit, located on the
northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap, and Bradshaw Road,
Catawba Magisterial District
3. The petition of David and Stace Todd to obtain a special use permit in a R-1, Low
Density Residential, District to comply with the use and design standards
associated with an accessory apartment in an accessory building on
approximately 0.346 acre, located at 1047 Barrens Village Court, Hollins
Magisterial District
F. APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed by District)
2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFAC) (appointed by District and At -Large)
3. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District)
4. Library Board (appointed by District)
5. Parks, Recreation and Tourism (appointed by District)
G. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY
THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTIO N
IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT
ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE
CONSIDERED SEPARATELY
1. Approval of minutes – September 24, 2019; October 8, 2019; October 10, 2019
Page 4 of 5
2. Designation of voting delegate to the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo)
Conference to be held November 10-12, 2019
3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County to Edith Jones, Custodian, upon her retirement after more than twenty -
eight (28) years of service
4. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $18,609 from the
Commonwealth of Virginia to the Clerk of the Circuit Court
5. Request to accept and allocate a Stormwater Management (SWM) Program
grant in the amount of $600,000 from the Department of Environmental Quality
for restoration of Wolf Creek Stream Restoration Project at Goode Park, Phase I
(Tarek Moneir, Acting Director of Development Services)
6. Resolution petitioning the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virgini a to declare
Roanoke County a drought disaster area
H. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
I. REPORTS
1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves
2. Outstanding Debt Report
3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of Sept ember 30,
2019
4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and
Encumbrances as of September 30, 2019
5. Accounts Paid – September 30, 2019
6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of
September 30, 2019
J. WORK SESSIONS
1. Work session to discuss neighborhood traffic calming and through-truck
restrictions with the Board of Supervisors (Richard Caywood, Assistant County
Administrator)
Page 5 of 5
EVENING SESSION
K. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. The petition of Lewis Gale Medical Center to rezone approximately 1.44 acres
from R-1, Low Density Residential District, District to C-1, Low Intensity
Commercial, District for a medical office – free standing emergency room,
located at 1423 West Ruritan Road, Hollins Magisterial District (Philip Thompson,
Acting Director of Planning)
L. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. David F. Radford
2. P. Jason Peters
3. George G. Assaid
4. Martha B. Hooker
5. Phil C. North
N. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. C.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Cmdr. Raymond Torres for receiving the
International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) 40
under 40 Award
SUBMITTED BY: Howard B. Hall
Chief of Police
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Recognition of Commander Raymond Torres
BACKGROUND:
The annual IACP 40 Under 40 Award recognizes 40 law enforcement professionals
under the age of 40 from around the world who demonstrate leadership and exemplify
commitment to their profession. The dedicated law enforcement professionals selected
for the 2019 IACP 40 Under 40 award are current and up-and-coming leaders. Each
winner was chosen for his or her demonstration of strong values and commitment to the
law enforcement field.
Commander Raymond Torres has been a member of the Police Department since
2006. He is currently the commander of the evening patrol shift, the largest in the
Department. After following in the footsteps of his father, mother, and brother to serve in
the U.S. Army, Commander Torres developed a strong passion for leadership, which he
wanted to bring to his law enforcement career. He has emphasized this value by
mentoring and developing his officers’ abilities. He was instrumental in creating the
department’s leadership development program for new and prospective sergeants and
continuing training for commanders. The leadership skills that Commander Torres
possesses were utilized to implement the Sergeant FTO Program and to create a one -
on-one performance reviews, as well as one-on-one supervisor-employee ride-alongs.
Page 2 of 2
He also supervises the Hostage Negotiation Team, where he has worked to improve
training for the team and update the equipment used by the negotiators.
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. C.2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation recognizing November 2019 as National
Adoption Month and November 23, 2019, as National
Adoption Day in the County of Roanoke
SUBMITTED BY: Joyce Earl
Director of Social Services
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
Adoption Month is celebrated each November and Adoption Day will be recognized on
November 23, 2019. A local committee plans an event to celebrate those families who
have adopted throughout the year, as well as, those who will finalize their adoptions that
morning in Roanoke County Circuit Court. A proclamation is prepared each year as well
that we present to the families.
@nun±\! nf ~nannke
tOC~~~ctf inq
~ . ..------:-11. ;o
C')
~ ~
DECLARING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2019 AS
NATIONAL ADOPTION MONTH IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
WHEREAS, families can provide love and security for children and many children wait
for forever families ; and
WHEREAS, children who need forever families may be young or young adults of any
heritage and may have special needs ; and
WHEREAS, adoption gives children a loving family in which to grow; and
WHEREAS, many families in the Roanoke Valley have chosen adoption as a way to create
or enlarge their families; and
WHEREAS, adoptive families in the Roanoke Valley are recognized and congratulated
for their commitment to children and to children's rights to loving and secure
homes; and
WHEREAS, National Adoption Day, which will be held on November 23, 2019, is
sponsored by a coalition of national partners to draw special attention to foster
children waiting for forever families and to celebrate all loving families who
adopt
NOW, THEREFORE, We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby
proclaim and recognize the month of November 2019 as NATIONAL
ADOPTION MONTH throughout the County of Roanoke; and
FURTHER, by this proclamation, we give notice to our citizens to celebrate the Important
role adoption plays in our society and call upon the citizens of Roanoke
County to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities that
honor adoptive families.
Presented this 22nd day of October 2019
George Assaid
Martha Hooker
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Fellowship Community Church to rezone
property to remove the proffered conditions and to obtain a
special use permit for a religious assembly on approximately
3.50 acres zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial, District
with conditions, located near the 6500 block of Merriman
Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson
Acting Director of Planning
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the
manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public
hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public
hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for November 19, 2019.
The title of this ordinance is as follows:
1. The petition of Fellowship Community Church to rezone property to remove
the proffered conditions and to obtain a special use permit for a religious
assembly on approximately 3.50 acres zoned C -2C, High Intensity
Commercial, District with conditions, located near the 6500 block of Merriman
Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Page 2 of 2
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion on this item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose
of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for November 19, 2019.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Item(s) 2 and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
²
Aerial Image
Roanoke Cou nty, VA 2019, Sou rce: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,
0 295 Feet 590 1,180 CNES/Air bu s DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Commu nity,
Date: 10/3/2019 1:9,028 Roanoke Cou nty 2018
Roanoke Cou nty, Vir ginia
2019
Aerial View
6591 Merriman Road
Roanoke Va 24018
Tax Map Number:
(portion of parcel)
097.01-02-12.00-0000
Portion size: 3.5 acres
Zoning: C2S
Proposed zoning: C2
with Special Use for
religious assembly
Magisterial District:
Cave Spring
Full parcel
Subject portion
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke VA 24018
²
CC22CCSS
Zoning
RR11SS
II22 CC11CC
CC11
CC22SS
CC22CC
CC22
AG3
AR
C1
C2 RR11CC
I1
I2
PRD
R
AARR
RR33CC
II11
RR11
.
PPRRDD
AAGG33
II11SS
RR22
0 295 Feet 590 1,180
Date: 10/3/2019 1:9,028
Roanoke County, Vir ginia
2019
Zoning Map
6591 Merriman Road
Roanoke VA 24018
Zoning: C2S
Proposed zoning: C2
with Special Use for
religious assembly
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
(portion of parcel)
097.01-02-12.00-0000
Portion size: 3.5 acres
TR BASE MAP CO
PI
NC
DE
Future Land Use
Conservation
Rural Preserve
Development
Neighborhood Conservation
Transition
Core RP
Principal Industrial CN
Fe e t 0 295 590 1,180
Date : 10/4/2019 1:9,028
Roanoke County, Virginia
2019
Future Land Use Map
6591 Merriman Road
Roanoke Va 24018
Tax Map Number:
(portion of parcel)
097.01-02-12.00-0000
Portion size: 3.5 acres
Zoning: C2S
Proposed zoning: C2
with Special Use for
religious assembly
Magisterial District:
Cave Spring
Subject parcel
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E.2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to obtain
a special use permit for a sanitary landfill on approximately
8.05 acres zoned AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District
and to amend the special use permit for an existing sanitary
landfill (Smith Gap Landfill) on approximately 886.80 acres
zoned AG-3S, Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District with a
special use permit, located on the northwest side of Fort
Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap, and Bradshaw Road,
Catawba Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson
Acting Director of Planning
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the
manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public
hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public
hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for November 19, 2019.
The title of this ordinance is as follows:
1. The petition of Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to obtain a special use permit
for a sanitary landfill on approximately 8.05 acres zoned AG -3, Agricultural/Rural
Preserve, District and to amend the special use permit for an existing sanitary
Page 2 of 2
landfill (Smith Gap Landfill) on approximately 886.80 acres zoned AG -3S,
Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District with a special use permit, located on the
northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap, and Bradshaw Road,
Catawba Magisterial District.
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion on this item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose
of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for November 19, 2019.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
²
Aerial View
,
0 145 Feet 290 580 ,
Date: 10/2/2019 1:4,51
Roanoke Cou nty, Vir ginia
2019
Aerial View
8484 Bradshaw Road
Smith Gap Landfill
Roanoke Valley
Resource Authority
Existing Zoning: AG3
Proposed Zoning: AG3S
Tax Map Number:
052.00-01-02.08-0000
Parcel size:
8.05 acres
Magisterial District:
Catawba
Subject site
Roanoke Co. Planning
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Dr.
REESE MOUNTAIN
GREY FOX
WILLIBY
BERRYBROOK
SINKER
SADDLESORE
RUBY MILLS
BLUEBIRD
BLACKSBURG
GRACIE
BRADSHAW
REESE MOUNTAIN
GREY FOX
WILLIBY
BERRYBROOK
DOW HOLLOW
BLACKSBURG
GRACIE
Roanoke county, VA 2019
0 0.35 0.7 1.05 1.40.17 5 Miles
Bradshaw Road
Aerial View
Jurisdictions
Streets
Smith G ap L andfill RVRA properties
±
Montgomery County
Roanoke County
Zoning Map
AAGG33SS
AAGG33
Feet 0 145 290 580
Date: 10/2/2019
Roanoke Cou nty, Vir ginia
2019
Zoning Map
8484 Badshaw Road
Smith Gap Landfill
Roanoke Valley
Resource Authority
Zoning:
Tax Map Number:
052.00-01-02.08-0000
Parcel size:
8.05 acres
Magisterial District:
Catawba
Subject site
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Dr.
POOR MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN PARK
REESE MOUNTAIN
INGAL
TOBEY
FORT LEWIS CHURCH
GLENMARY
GREY FOX
GLENVAR HEIGHTS
DOW HOLLOW
TWINE HOLLOW
LAKE FRONT
MEACHAM
WILLIBY
INDIAN HEAD
YALE
BERRYBROOK
HARWICK
PRUNTY
PLEASANT RUN
SUNDANCE
CORPORATE
DAN ROBIN
BOHON HOLLOW
HIDDEN COVE
STANLEY FARM
DEWBERRY
INDIAN HILL
LITTLE BEAR
MALUS
THURMAN
BYDAWYLE
GROVER
TREE TOP CAMP
WESTWARD LAKE
VINTAGE
STARTER
SINKER
WARRIOR
KELLEY
GETTY
GUMWOOD
DEACONESS
CHEROKEE RDG
ARTRIP
FALLBROOKE
FURNACE
CANOE
SADDLESORE
TEE PEE
SCENERY
FULCHER
RIVER BEND
RUBY MILLS
SHICKSHINNY
MINER
WHISPERING WIND
WARBONNET
DOT
WHITE EAGLE
ADEL
NELLIE
MAYWOOD
PINE
EDGEWOOD
81 RAMP
BLUEBIRD
VIEWPOINT
BLACKSBURG
BUCKSKIN
TECHNOLOGY
DOGWOOD
NETA
MAYFAIR
UPHILL
81 RAMP
CARTER
SLEEPY HOLLOW
ELMWOOD
HIDEAWAY
SCOUT
ROGER
HILLCREST
CHEROKEE HILLS
81 RAMP
81 RAMP
ARROWHEAD
GRACIE
AG3
AG3C
PTD
AG3S
R1
I2C
R1S
AR
AG1
I2
C1
C2
I1
R1MH
AV
AVS
R1C
C2SC2CS
I2S
I1C
81
BRADSHAW
MOUNTAIN PARK
REESE MOUNTAIN
BLACKSBURG
GREY FOX
YALE
HARWICK
GRACIE
81
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.40.3 Miles
Bradshaw Road
±
Montgomery County
Roanoke County
Zoning Map
Zoning Districts
Smith Gap Landfill RVRA properties
Streets
AG3AG1
AR
AV
C1
C2
I1
I2PTDR1
Ag ricultural/R ural PreserveAgricultural/R ural Lo w D ensity
Ag ricultural/R eside ntial
Ag ricultural/Villa ge Cen ter
Low In te nsity Co mme rcial
High Intensity Commercial
Low In te nsity Indu stria l
High Intensity Ind ustrial
Planne d Techno log y De velop me ntLow Den sity Residentia l
Montgomery County iGIS Map Portal
Powered by Ovela Constellation GIS Platform
M 1:312600
Zoning Map Montgomery County
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Smith Gap
Landfill
Bradshaw Road
North Fork Road
Fu tu re Land Us e Map
RP
Feet 0 145 290 580
Date: 10/2/2019 1:4,514 Roanoke Cou nty, Virg inia 2019
Roanoke Cou nty, Virg inia
2019
Future Land Use Map
8484 Bradshaw Road
Smith Gap Landfill
Roanoke Valley
Resource Authority
Future Land Use
Designation:
Tax Map Number:
052.00-01-02.08-0000
Parcel size:
8.05 acres
Magisterial District:
Catawba
Subject site
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Dr.
WEST MAIN
POOR MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN PARK
REESE MOUNTAIN
DAUGHERTY
INGAL
TOBEY
FORT LEWIS CHURCH
GLENMARY
GREY FOX
GLENVAR HEIGHTS
DOW HOLLOW
TWINE HOLLOW
LAKE FRONT
MEACHAM
WILLIBY
YALE
BERRYBROOK
PRUNTY
PLEASANT RUN
BEASON
SUNDANCE
CORPORATE
DAN ROBIN
GIVENS TYLER
HIDDEN COVE
STANLEY FARM
DEWBERRY
INDIAN HILL
LITTLE BEAR
MALUS
CROSSMILL
THURMAN
BYDAWYLE
WESTWARD LAKE
VINTAGE
SINKER
WARRIOR
BEAR CLAW FARMS
MARTIN MCNEIL
KELLEY
DEACONESS
CHEROKEE RDG
ARTRIP
POLLY
DIX MILL
SPICEWO OD
WALDON
FALLBROOKE
FURNACE
CANOE
SADDLESORE
TEE PEE KOPPERS
SCENERY
FULCHER
RUBY MILLS
SHICKSHINNY
MINER
WHISPERING WIND
WARBONNET
MORGAN CONNER
IVIE
DOT
WHITE EAGLE
ADEL
LELIA
NELLIE
STANLEY
MAYWOOD
PINE
EDGEWOOD
81 RAMP
BLUEBIRD
BARLEY
VIEWPOINT
BLACKSBURG
BUCKSKIN
TECHNOLOGY
DOGWOOD
NETA
MAYFAIR
UPHILL
81 RAMP
CARTER
GIVENS
SLEEPY HOLLOW
ELMWOOD
GRAVEL HILL
HIDEAWAY
SCOUT
HILLCREST
CHEROKEE HILLS
81 RAMP
81 RAMP
ARROWHEAD
GRACIE
81
BRADSHAW
BLACKSBURG
MOUNTAIN PARK
REESE MOUNTAIN
WEST MAINGREY FOX
GRAVEL HILL
YALE
BEASON
GRACIE
81
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.40.3 Miles
Bradshaw Road
±
Montgomery County
Roanoke County
Futu re Land Use Map
Smith Gap Landfill RVRA properties
Conservation
Core
Development
Glenvar Village
Neighborhood Conservation
Principal Industrial
Rural Preserve
Rural Village
Transition
Montgomery County iGIS Map Portal
Powered by Ovela Constellation GIS Platform
M 1:312600
Future Land Use Map Montgomery County
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Bradshaw Road
Smith Gap
Landfill
North Fork Road
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: The petition of David and Stace Todd to obtain a special use
permit in a R-1, Low Density Residential, District to comply
with the use and design standards associated with an
accessory apartment in an accessory building on
approximately 0.346 acre, located at 1047 Barrens Village
Court, Hollins Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson
Acting Director of Planning
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Consent agenda item for first reading on an ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the
manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public
hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public
hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for November 19, 2019.
The title of this ordinance is as follows:
1. The petition of David and Stace Todd to obtain a special use permit in a R -1,
Low Density Residential, District to comply with the use and design standards
associated with an accessory apartment in an accessory building on
approximately 0.346 acre, located at 1047 Barrens Village Court, Hollins
Magisterial District.
Page 2 of 2
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion on this item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the f irst reading of this ordinance for the purpose
of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for November 19, 2019.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Item(s) 3, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
²
Aerial Map
Ro ano ke Co unty, VA 2019, So ur c e: Esri, DigitalGlo be, Geo Eye, Ear thstar Geo graphic s,
0 15 Feet 30 60 CNES/Air bus DS, USDA, USGS, Aero GRID, IGN, and the GIS User Co mmunity,
Date: 10/2/2019 1:564 Ro ano ke Co unty 2018
Ro ano ke Co unty, Vir ginia
2019
Aerial View
1047 Barrens Village Ct
Roanoke VA 24019
Tax Map Number:
027.09-06-42.00-0000
Parcel Size: .346 acres
Zoning: R-1
Proposed Zoning: R-1S
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Subject Parcel
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke VA 24018
²
Roanoke County, VA 2019, Source : Es ri, DigitalGlobe , Ge oEye , Earths tar Ge ographics ,
0 145 Fe e t 290 580 CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Ae roGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us e r Community,
Date : 10/3/2019 1:4,514 Roanoke County 2018
Roanoke County, Virginia
2019
Aerial View
1047 Barrens Village Ct
Roanoke VA 24019
Tax Map Number:
027.09-06-42.00-0000
Parcel Size: .346 acres
Zoning: R-1
Proposed Zoning: R-1S
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Subject Parcel
Roanoke Co. Planning
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
²
Zoning Map
RR11
Roanoke County, VA 2019, Source: Es r i, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Ear ths tar Geogr ap hics ,
0 145 Feet 290 580 CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Aer oGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us er Community,
Date: 10/2/2019 1:4,514 Roanoke County 2018
Roanoke County, Vir ginia
2019
Zoning Map
1047 Barrens Village Ct
Roanoke VA 24019
Tax Map Number:
027.09-06-42.00-0000
Parcel Size: .346 acres
Subject Parcel
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
²
TR
NC
PI
Roanoke County, VA 2019, Sour ce: Es r i, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Ear ths tar Geograp hics ,
0 295 Feet 590 1,180 CNES/Air bus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS Us er Community,
Date: 10/2/2019 1:9,028 Roanoke County 2018 DE
Roanoke County, Vir ginia
2019
Future Land Use Map
1047 Barrens Village Ct
Roanoke VA 24019
Tax Map Number:
027.09-06-42.00-0000
Parcel Size: .346 acres
Subject Parcel
Roanoke Co. Planning
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke VA 24018
Conservation
Transition
Principal
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. F.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boa rds
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Open district appointments.
BACKGROUND:
1. Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed by District)
Barry Beckner’s five (5) year appointment representing the Cave Spring Magisterial
District expired on June 30, 2019
2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District)
The following District appointments remain open:
Cave Spring Magisterial District
Vinton Magisterial District
Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (At-Large)
Two open appointments
3. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District)
Leon McGhee, representing the Vinton Magisterial District, has resigned from the
EDA effective February 1, 2019. This appointment has a four-year term and will
Page 2 of 2
not expire until September 26, 2021.
Linwood P. Windley, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, has
resigned from the EDA effective January 1, 2019. This appointment has a four-
year term and will not expire until September 26, 2020.
4. Library Board (appointed by District)
The following District appointment remains open:
Vinton Magisterial District
5. Parks, Recreation and Tourism (appointed by District)
Mike Roop’s three (3) year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District has
expired effective June 30, 2019.
Fred W. Corbett’s three (3)-year term representing the Cave Spring Magisterial
District has expired effective June 30, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS
SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM G - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 22,
2019, designated as Item G - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes – September 24, 2019; October 8, 2019; October 10, 2019
2. Designation of voting delegate to the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo)
Conference to be held November 10-12, 2019
3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County to Edith Jones, Custodian, upon her retirement after more than twenty-
eight (28) years of service
4. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $18,609 from the
Commonwealth of Virginia to the Clerk of the Circuit Court
5. Request to accept and allocate a Stormwater Management (SWM) Program
grant in the amount of $600,000 from the Department of Environmental Quality
for restoration of Wolf Creek Stream Restoration – Water Quality Improvement
Project at Goode Park – Phase I
6. Resolution petitioning the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia to declare
Roanoke County a drought disaster area
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Designation of voting delegate to the Virginia Association of
Counties (VACo) Conference to be held November 10-12,
2019
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Designation of voting delegate to VACo
BACKGROUND:
The Virginia Association of Counties' (VACo) annual conference will be held November
10-12, 2019. They have requested that each county designate a representative of its
Board of Supervisors as well as an alternate to cast its votes at the annual business
meeting on Tuesday, November 12, 2019. The voting credentials form must be
submitted to VACo by November 1, 2019.
DISCUSSION:
Chairman Phil C. North will be attending the conference and it is recommended that he
be appointed as Roanoke County's voting representative for 2019. Additionally, it is
recommended that Daniel R. O’Donnell, County Administrator, be designated as the
alternate.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this Board action.
Page 2 of 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appointing Phil C. North and Daniel R. O'Donnell as the voting
representatives for 2019.
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to Edith Jones, Custodian,
upon her retirement after more than twenty-eight (28) years
of service
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Recognition of the retirement of Edith Jones
BACKGROUND:
Edith Jones, Custodian, retired on October 1, 2019, after twenty-eight (28) years and
three (3) months of service with General Services.
Ms. Jones is unable to attend today’s meeting and her quilt and resolution will be mailed
to her home.
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion associated with this agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO EDITH JONES, CUSTODIAN,
UPON HER RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN TWENTY–EIGHT (28)
YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Edith Jones was employed by Roanoke County on June 24, 1991;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones retired on October 1, 2019, after twenty-eight (28) years
and three (3) months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been
instrumental in improving the quality of life and providing services to the citizens of
Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, throughout Ms. Jones’ tenure with Roanoke County, she played an
integral role in the cleanliness and overall quality presentation of County facilities, to
include the Roanoke County Courthouse, Hollins Library, Roanoke County Administration
Center and Roanoke County Public Service Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of
Roanoke County to EDITH JONES for more than twenty-eight (28) years of capable,
loyal, and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and
productive retirement.
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of
$18,609 from the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Clerk of
the Circuit Court
SUBMITTED BY: Jill Camilletti
Deputy Clerk IV
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $18,609 to the Clerk of the
Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia
BACKGROUND:
Technology Trust Funds representing fees collected by the Roanoke County Circuit
Court Clerk's Office, have been received from the State in the amount of $18,609. In
accordance with State of Virginia Code Section 17.1 -279, the Circuit Court Clerks
Office shall assess a $5.00 fee called Technology Trust Fund Fee. Each month, the
Clerk's Office can request the fees that were assessed the previous month. The code
section further states that four of every five dollar fee shall be allocated by the
Compensation Board from the trust fund for the purposes of obtaining and updating
office automation and information technology equipment including software and
conversion services; preserving, maintaining and enhancing court records, including but
not limited to the costs of repairs, maintenance, land records, consulting services,
service contracts, redaction of social security numbers from land records and system
replacement or upgrades and improving public access to court records.
DISCUSSION:
The funds received from the Commonwealth of Virginia have been earmarked for
maintenance needs for the Clerk of Circuit Court, specifically towards the twice yearly
Page 2 of 2
maintenance bill from the Supreme Court for maintaining their records, equipment, etc.
and funds to offset the cost of postage.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All funds are provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia. No County matching funds
are required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends accepting and allocating $18,609 to the Clerk of Circuit Court from
the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate a Stormwater Management
(SWM) Program grant in the amount of $600,000 from the
Department of Environmental Quality for restoration of Wolf
Creek Stream Restoration Project at Goode Park – Phase I
SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir
Acting Director of Development Services
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Accept and allocate a Stormwater Management (SWM) Program grant in the amount of
$600,000 from the Department of Environmental Quality for Stream Restoration of Wolf
Creek at Goode Park - Phase I
BACKGROUND:
The Roanoke River is impaired by excessive sediment. Roanoke County has an
obligation under its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit to lower
discharges of sediment to the Roanoke River towards meeting its Waste Load
Allocation. The staff applied for grant from the Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) for a Water Quality improvement project at Goode Park. The project is to restore
Wolf Creek to a more natural stream condition.
DISCUSSION:
Roanoke County was selected by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality-
Stormwater Local Assistance fund for a grant to facilitate the stream restoration of Wolf
Creek at Goode Park, Phase I. The estimated cost of the project is $600,000 excluding
staff time for administration.
This project will lower sediment discharge to the Roanoke River and it will mitigate
Page 2 of 2
erosion that is occurring in the stream causing damage to the park and the adjacent
Wolf Creek Greenway.
This project will use natural stream restoration methods, including the use of natural
stone and vegetation, to stabilize approximately 1,000 linear feet of Wolf Creek
FISCAL IMPACT:
State grant funds in the amount of $300,000 and local matching funds (50%) in the
amount of $300,000 were appropriated in the 2020-2029 Capital Improvement Program
for the NPDES-MS4 BMP Construction program. These funds need to be allocated
from the NPDES-MS4-BMP project to the Wolf Creek at Goode Park-Phase I stream
restoration project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends accepting the grant from the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality and allocating funds in the amount of $600,000 for the stream restoration of
Wolf Creek at Goode Park-Phase I.
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.6
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution petitioning the Governor of the Commonwealth of
Virginia to declare Roanoke County a drought disaster area
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Consideration of a resolution to petition the Governor of Virginia to declare Roanoke
County a drought disaster area
BACKGROUND:
Per the attached letter, the Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension office has asked that
we consider the attached resolution to petition the Governor to declar e a disaster area
due to the drought. This declaration could provide a means for those affected by the
drought to qualify for relief assistance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Extension is a joint program of Virginia Tech, Virginia State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and state and local governments.
Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, political
affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, veteran status, or any other basis protected by law. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer.
Virginia Cooperative Extension
Botetourt Office
PO Box 217
9 West Main Street
Fincastle, Virginia 24090
Ph: 540-473-8260 Fax: 540-473-8379
email: MCL87@vt.edu
October 4, 2019
TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
SUBJECT: Update on Drought and Agricultural Conditions in Roanoke County
The purpose of this letter is to provide data and information regarding the effects of the lack of
measurable precipitation and above-average temperatures on the agricultural community during
the fall of 2019.
Rainfall levels have been well below average for the months of August and September. August
rainfall in 2019 totaled 3.13 inches and average rainfall for August is 4.18 inches, putting us
over an inch behind. While just one inch behind doesn’t seem significant it should be noted that
almost all of August's rainfall happened before the 15th of the month leaving the last two weeks
of the month very dry. Total September rainfall for 2019 was 0.81 inches and the average is
3.98 inches. This is 20% of our normal precipitation for the month of September.
It is also pertinent to note that daily temperatures have far exceeded our normal fall highs which
leads to drying of the topsoil layer significantly faster, thus what small amounts of rainfall we
have received has done very little to actually alleviate the dry conditions.
Pastures and fall/winter grazing land have deteriorated throughout the recent weeks and many
producers have started feeding hay. This will likely result in producers not having sufficient
supplies to carry their livestock through the winter months. I have spoken with local farmers that
are feeding hay 90 days ahead of when they normally start to utilize their winter reserves.
Because these conditions are not county-specific, I am already seeing a hay shortage in much
of the state making it nearly impossible to find additional hay reserves to be purchased in or out
of our area.
An equal opportunity, affirm ative action institution
There is a high probability that some water sources such as springs have already dried up and
more will follow leaving the producers with even fewer grazing options as water sources
become more scarce.
Crops such as corn and soybeans have not been affected due to the majority of the early
growing season being on target with precipitation levels.
At this time, I believe conditions have deteriorated to an extent that warrants action and
requests the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution asking the Governor to seek
designation of Roanoke County as a disaster area. A disaster declaration could provide a
means for those affected to qualify for relief assistance.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions or require more
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the Roaonke Extension Office,
540/772-7524.
Sincerely,
Kate
Mary Catherine Lawrence
Extension Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources
Roanoke County, Roanoke City, City of Salem
Botetourt County
Leslie Prillaman
Extension Agent, Unit Coordinator
Roanoke County, Roanoke City, City of Salem
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019
RESOLUTION PETITIONING THE GOVERNOR OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO DECLARE ROANOKE COUNTY A
DROUGHT DISASTER AREA
WHEREAS, there continues to be dry conditions throughout the fall of 2019 in
Roanoke County, Virginia, which have caused widespread, substantial grass and grazing
land damage; and
WHEREAS, unseasonably high temperatures are accelerat ing the effects of the
rainfall deficit; and
WHEREAS, livestock water resources are declining; and
WHEREAS, the lack of sufficient pasture has required farmers to use winter feed
reserves; and
WHEREAS, there does not appear to be any significant r elief in the foreseeable
future; and
WHEREAS, these conditions have and continue to cause financial loss to the
farmers in Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors hereby petitions the Honorable Ralph Northam, Governor of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, to declare Roanoke County a drought disaster area in order
to provide the means for those affected to qualify for some relief assistance.
Unappropriated % of Board
Balance Revenues Contingency Reserves
Unaudited balance as of June 30, 2019 22,880,500$ -$ 1,621,518$
Approved Sources:
Appropriated from 2019-20 budget (Ordinance 052819-4)718,298 50,000
Approved Uses:
Appropriated for 2019-20 budget (Ordinance 052819-5)(815,480)
Balance at October 22, 2019 23,598,798$ 12.0%50,000$ 806,038$
General Government
County of Roanoke
Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves
Fiscal Year 2019-2020
Capital
Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows:
Unaudited
Outstanding Outstanding
June 30, 2019 Additions Deletions October 22, 2019
General Obligation Bonds 1,866,987$ -$ -$ 1,866,987$
VPSA School Bonds 91,947,188 - 8,885,422 83,061,766
Lease Revenue Bonds 75,035,000 - 3,060,000 71,975,000
Subtotal 168,849,175 - 11,945,422 156,903,753
Premiums 11,356,389 - - 11,356,389
180,205,564$ -$ 11,945,422$ - 168,260,142$
Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart
Director of Finance and Management Services
Approved By Daniel R. O'Donnell
County Administrator
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT
Revenues Revenues
Budget Revenues % of Budget Budget Revenues % of Budget Actuals % of Variance
Real Estate Taxes $92,945,661 $3,119,877 3.36%$96,420,000 $3,224,989 3.34%$105,111 3.26%
Personal Property Taxes 33,546,384 515,252 1.54%33,675,000 578,222 1.72%62,971 10.89%
Public Service Corp Base 3,210,000 0 0.00%3,400,000 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Penalties & Interest on Property Taxes 800,000 138,835 17.35%750,000 140,905 18.79%2,071 1.47%
Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 180,000 0 0.00%180,000 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Total General Property Taxes 130,682,045 3,773,963 2.89%134,425,000 3,944,116 2.93%170,153 4.31%
Communication Taxes 3,600,000 579,718 16.10%3,250,000 536,749 16.52%(42,969)-8.01%
Local Sales Tax 10,484,945 1,863,207 17.77%11,370,594 2,013,917 17.71%150,710 7.48%
Consumer Utility Tax 3,750,000 563,096 15.02%3,800,000 560,004 14.74%(3,091)-0.55%
Business License Tax 6,372,700 249,942 3.92%6,775,000 283,014 4.18%33,073 11.69%
Franchise Tax 650,000 0 0.00%820,000 (5,455)-0.67%(5,455)100.00%
Motor Vehicle License Fees 2,312,387 247,486 10.70%2,383,600 248,642 10.43%1,156 0.46%
Taxes On Recordation & Wills 1,509,509 244,165 16.18%1,509,509 256,054 16.96%11,889 4.64%
Utility License Tax 510,000 79,406 15.57%530,000 125,148 23.61%45,742 36.55%
Hotel & Motel Room Taxes 1,461,052 133,412 9.13%1,468,357 125,698 8.56%(7,715)-6.14%
Taxes - Prepared Foods 4,616,011 756,037 16.38%4,510,000 776,532 17.22%20,496 2.64%
Other Taxes 94,000 17,202 18.30%90,000 27,497 30.55%10,295 37.44%
Total Other Local Taxes 35,360,604 4,733,670 13.39%36,507,060 4,947,801 13.55%214,131 4.33%
Animal Control Fees 44,500 2,815 6.33%42,500 8,873 20.88%6,058 68.27%
Land and Building Fees 17,625 4,798 27.23%15,850 3,619 22.83%(1,180)-32.60%
Permits 492,365 145,174 29.49%524,225 160,503 30.62%15,329 9.55%
Fees 56,500 16,702 29.56%64,600 17,713 27.42%1,011 5.71%
Clerk of Court Fees 180,000 45,501 25.28%167,000 23,157 13.87%(22,344)-96.49%
Photocopy Charges 210 15 7.14%210 41 19.52%26 63.41%
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues
General Fund - C100
For the Three Months Ending Monday, September 30, 2019
Prior Year Current Year Variances
Revenues Revenues
Budget Revenues % of Budget Budget Revenues % of Budget Actuals % of Variance
Prior Year Current Year Variances
Total Permits, Fees and Licenses 791,200 215,006 27.17%814,385 213,906 26.27%(1,100)-0.51%
Fines and Forfeitures 404,500 81,745 20.21%453,500 56,061 12.36%(25,684)-45.81%
Total Fines and Forfeitures 404,500 81,745 20.21%453,500 56,061 12.36%(25,684)-45.81%
Revenues from Use of Money 125,000 (14,426)-11.54%210,000 38,238 18.21%52,664 137.73%
Revenues From Use of Property 146,200 44,097 30.16%178,200 45,508 25.54%1,411 3.10%
Total Use of Money and Property 271,200 29,671 10.94%388,200 83,746 21.57%54,075 64.57%
Charges for Services 4,176,765 663,544 15.89%4,050,075 711,915 17.58%48,371 6.79%
Charges for Public Services 40,000 14,308 35.77%70,000 9,133 13.05%(5,175)-56.66%
Education Aid-State 38,000 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Total Charges for Services 4,254,765 677,852 15.93%4,120,075 721,048 17.50%43,196 5.99%
Reimb-Shared Programs Salem 625,514 34,045 5.44%750,514 72,395 9.65%38,350 52.97%
Miscellaneous Revenue 306,036 58,356 19.07%408,536 108,718 26.61%50,362 46.32%
Recovered Costs 913,635 140,308 15.36%944,775 141,161 14.94%853 0.60%
Total Miscellaneous 1,845,185 232,709 12.61%2,103,825 322,274 15.32%89,565 27.79%
Non-Categorical Aid 413,000 459,346 111.22%402,000 397,680 98.93%(61,665)-15.51%
Shared Expenses 5,056,707 778,990 15.41%5,249,768 809,159 15.41%30,169 3.73%
Welfare & Social Services-Categorical 4,371,535 709,487 16.23%4,380,000 782,647 17.87%73,160 9.35%
Other State Categorical Aid 2,112,173 553,372 26.20%2,195,683 541,011 24.64%(12,361)-2.28%
Welfare & Social Services 4,462,294 976,458 21.88%4,625,000 1,046,027 22.62%69,569 6.65%
Education Aid-Federal 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Other Categorical Aid 5,000 0 0.00%4,500 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Revenues Revenues
Budget Revenues % of Budget Budget Revenues % of Budget Actuals % of Variance
Prior Year Current Year Variances
Total State and Federal Revenue 16,420,709 3,477,652 21.18%16,856,951 3,576,524 21.22%98,871 2.76%
Other Financing Sources 447,486 0 0.00%1,318,298 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Total Other Financing Sources 447,486 0 0.00%1,318,298 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Transfers 256,894 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Total Transfers 256,894 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Grand Totals 190,734,588 13,222,269 6.93%196,987,294 13,865,477 7.04%643,207 4.64%
Expenditures Exp & Encum Expenditures Exp & Encum % of
Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Actuals Variance
Legislative 325,980 73,262 22.47%339,239 77,926 22.97%2,492 3.29%
General & Financial Administration 8,073,093 1,784,267 22.10%7,653,100 1,636,743 21.39%(203,059)-12.94%
Electoral Board & Officials 414,373 74,873 18.07%409,010 111,610 27.29%37,258 39.94%
Courts 1,588,083 142,646 8.98%1,589,405 346,863 21.82%203,889 58.84%
Other Judicial Support 1,101,738 277,058 25.15%1,173,697 253,360 21.59%(23,698)-9.35%
Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont 14,128,613 3,922,508 27.76%14,685,286 3,955,594 26.94%38,540 0.97%
Fire and Rescue 15,736,470 3,975,079 25.26%16,809,204 4,303,440 25.60%335,919 7.81%
Correction & Detention 8,284,330 1,775,909 21.44%9,259,350 1,933,710 20.88%211,171 11.03%
Animal Control 603,792 139,640 23.13%670,810 180,186 26.86%40,546 22.50%
General Services Administration 583,344 125,477 21.51%614,961 155,531 25.29%29,897 19.24%
Refuse Disposal 4,859,519 1,074,891 22.12%5,146,905 1,131,197 21.98%55,813 4.94%
Maint Buildings & Grounds 4,817,823 1,310,921 27.21%4,965,350 1,283,728 25.85%(32,975)-2.58%
Engineering 1,820,564 524,124 28.79%1,862,851 468,233 25.14%(21,294)-4.72%
Inspections 1,210,101 303,135 25.05%1,193,526 264,227 22.14%(38,908)-14.73%
Garage Complex 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Mental Health 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Public Health 500,358 125,090 25.00%500,358 124,599 24.90%(490)-0.39%
Social Services Administration 6,929,383 1,586,970 22.90%8,109,949 1,795,994 22.15%232,994 12.98%
Comprehensive Services Act 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Public Assistance 4,702,666 1,104,141 23.48%4,718,666 1,210,071 25.64%105,930 8.75%
Social Services Organizations 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances
General Fund - C100
For the Three Months Ending Monday, September 30, 2019
Prior Year Current Year Variances
Expenditures Exp & Encum Expenditures Exp & Encum % of
Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Budget & Encumbrances % of Budget Actuals Variance
Prior Year Current Year Variances
Parks & Recreation 2,394,696 663,123 27.69%2,350,651 587,684 25.00%(92,888)-16.32%
Library 4,255,124 881,144 20.71%4,182,511 959,701 22.95%78,926 8.22%
Cultural Enrichment 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Planning & Zoning 1,037,573 253,514 24.43%1,243,272 232,078 18.67%(23,651)-10.29%
Cooperative Extension Program 87,097 211 0.24%87,097 305 0.35%94 30.71%
Economic Development 533,504 122,115 22.89%452,528 80,094 17.70%(42,021)-52.46%
Contribution to Human Service Organizations 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Employee Benefits 2,552,205 721,516 28.27%2,324,380 589,727 25.37%(164,337)-29.63%
Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup 52,000 4,823 9.27%52,000 7,382 14.20%2,559 34.67%
Miscellaneous 8,701,491 2,765,939 31.79%9,851,975 2,854,168 28.97%145,610 5.10%
Tax Relief/Elderly & Handicapp 850,000 463,294 54.51%960,000 593,685 61.84%130,391 21.96%
Refuse Credit Vinton 670,000 0 0.00%110,000 55,000 50.00%55,000 100.00%
Board Contingency 497,486 0 0.00%768,298 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Unappropriated Balance 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Interfund Transfers Out 89,132,381 23,021,557 25.83%90,125,712 24,451,544 27.13%1,429,987 5.85%
Intrafund Transfers Out 4,290,801 961,324 22.40%4,777,203 2,674,313 55.98%1,712,989 64.05%
ACTION NO.------
ITEM NO. --------
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -September 2019
SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart
Director of Finance and Management Services
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit
Payments to Vendors $
Payroll 09/06/19 1,400,664.64
Payroll 09/20/19 1,509,479.13
Manual Checks
Grand Total
Checks
$
15,205.23
13,129.18
2,246.97
A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
Total
$ 10,435,586.55
1,415,869.87
1,522,608.31
2,246.97
$ 13,376,311.70
ACTION NO.___________________
ITEM NUMBER_______________
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER.
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of
30-Sep-19
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
CASH INVESTMENT:
SUNTRUST CON 2,786,560.02 2,786,560.02
GOVERNMENT:
SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA (3,658.00)
SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 28,003,374.24
WELLS FARGO 2,000,000.00
WELLS FARGO CONTRA (1,480.00)29,998,236.24
LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL:
GENERAL OPERATION 27,532,712.52 27,532,712.52
MONEY MARKET:
ATLANTIC UNION BANK 2,013,898.60
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 2,064,501.64
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 96,861.82
HOMETRUST BANK 11,643.42
SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 22,730,809.89
WELLS FARGO 3,239,253.51
BANK OF THE JAMES 511,668.05 30,668,636.93
TOTAL 90,986,145.71
10/22/19
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. J.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss neighborhood traffic calming and
through-truck restrictions with the Board of Supervisors
SUBMITTED BY: Richard Caywood
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
This time has been set aside to discuss neighborhood traffic calming and through-truck
restrictions with the Board of Supervisors.
Traffic Calming and
Thru Truck Restrictions
Board of Supervisors Work Session
October 22, 2019
Traffic Calming Overview
•Background
•Roanoke County Speed Enforcement
•Neighborhood Speeding Concerns
•Citizen Requests for Traffic Calming
•VDOT Neighborhood Traffic Programs
•Henrico County Traffic Calming Program
•Recommendation
2
Background
•Concerns about “speeding” on residential streets are a frequently
raised citizen issue
•Roanoke County Police conducted 61 speed studies in 2019
•Most residential streets are posted for 25 mph
•Neighborhood speeding is a quality of life issue, few traffic crashes
occur on residential streets
•Like speeding, “cut-through traffic” is a common concern of citizens
3
Neighborhood Speeding Concerns
4
2019 Speed Surveys (85th Percentile Greater Than or Equal to 7 mph Over Speed Limit)
Road District Date of Speed Survey Average Speed 85th %Daily Traffic Count
Hardy Road (35 mph)V Jan-19 44 49 1297
Roselawn Road WH Jan-19 33 37 720
Canter Drive WH Sep-19 31 35 689
Mayfield Drive V Jul-19 31 35 482
View Avenue CS May-19 30 35 470
Hunting Hills Drive CS May-19 29 33 1381
Meadowlark Road CS Aug-19 28 33 572
Alleghany Drive C Jul-19 29 33 474
Texas Hollow Road C Aug-19 29 32 1331
Castle Rock Road WH Sep-19 28 32 1025
Thirlane Road C Jul-19 28 32 288
5
Enforcement Data over the Past Three Years
Neighborhood Speeding Concerns
Street Name District Warning Ticket Total
Hunting Hills Drive CS 36 359 395
Hardy Road V 74 245 319
Thirlane Road C 73 177 250
Roselawn Road WH 31 151 182
View Avenue CS 42 126 168
Castle Rock Road WH 36 108 144
Mayfield Drive V 5 101 106
Meadowlark Road CS 31 32 63
Alleghany Drive C 3 21 24
Canter Drive WH 4 10 14
Texas Hollow Road C 4 4 8
Citizen Requests for Traffic CalmingCanter Drive
•Posted Speed Limit: 25 mph
•85th percentile:
•36 mph (4/2014)
•35 mph (9/2019)
•Traffic counts (VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic):
•Roselawn Road to Squires Court: 2,300 (2014); 2,700 (2018)
•Squires Court to Cromwell Court: 2,000 (2014); 2,200 (2018)
•Cromwell Court to Cavalier Drive: 1,900 (2014); 2,100 (2018)
6
Citizen Requests for Traffic CalmingMeadowlark Road
•Posted Speed Limit: 25 mph
•85th percentile:
•32 mph (2/2014)
•33 mph (8/2019)
•Traffic counts (VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic):
•Merriman Road to Blue Bird Circle: 820 (2014); 990 (2018)
7
VDOT Neighborhood Traffic Programs
•Through Truck restrictions
•Traffic Calming
•“Watch for Children” Signs
•Enhanced Speeding Fines
8
VDOT Traffic Calming Measures (2018 Guide)
Non-Intrusive Measures
•Community education
•Community gateways
•Pavement marking changes
•Speed display signs
•Additional $200 Fine signs
Horizontal, Vertical and
Narrowing Devices
•Speed Hump, Lump, Table
•Raised Intersections, Crosswalks,
Median Islands
•Crosswalk Refuge
•Chicane
•Choker
•Curb Extension
9
VDOT Traffic Calming Guide for Neighborhood Streets (2018)
Process
1.Community members contact the locality; staff coordinates with VDOT to determine
eligibility (State system, in a neighborhood where houses face the street, 25 mph
speed limit or less).
2.Homeowners’ Association or Civic Association requests approval from the Board of
Supervisors to pursue traffic calming on the proposed street, conduct an engineering
review and pursue a traffic calming study.
3.Locality conducts an engineering review, traffic count and speed study; VDOT reviews
results.
10
VDOT Traffic Calming Guide for Neighborhood Streets (2018)
4.Locality and VDOT develop a conceptual traffic calming plan; agreement must be
secured for each affected property owner of a residence or business where the
physical location of a proposed traffic calming device or some portion lies within the
roadway frontage of the property boundary.
5.The proposed traffic calming plan and supporting information is presented or
provided to the community located within the identified survey area for review
(community meeting, mailing or other means to inform the community). Community
support is measured and documented through a petition, survey or other process.
•Only occupied residences or businesses in the study area are measured and counted;
•Each residence or business address gets a single signature or vote; and
•More than 50% of the occupied residences or businesses in the survey area must support the traffic calming
plan in order for it to be implemented.
11
VDOT Traffic Calming Guide for Neighborhood Streets (2018)
6.If the community approves, the Board of Supervisors endorses the plan by a
resolution.
7.VDOT will review the proposed plan, resolution and survey results to consider
implementation through VDOT contract forces or the Locality. Funding sources
typically include secondary or locality funds.
8.VDOT will inspect the project when construction is complete. A follow-up evaluation
may be conducted to determine effectiveness.
12
Henrico County Traffic Calming Program
1.Implemented in 2004
2.Speed studies performed based on citizen requests. Standard for action is an 85th
percentile speed that is 7 mph or more over the posted speed limit.
3.With required signatures, implement $200 enhanced fine speed zone signs.
4.Perform speed study after one year if citizens continue to report speeding issues.
5.If follow up study indicates continued speeding problem, evaluation for suitability
of speed humps is performed. Installed if engineering requirements are met and
required signatures obtained.
13
Recommendation
•Consider installing Pole Mounted Speed Boards as a
Pilot Project.
•Collect and evaluate speed data before and one year
after implementation.
•Receive citizen input on results of pilot.
•Based on evidence, consider expansion of program to
other areas.
•If warranted, develop County-wide policy for traffic
calming modeled after the Henrico County program.
14
Through Truck Restrictions
Through Truck Restrictions Overview
•Background
•Through Truck Restrictions Existing and Under Review
•Enforcement Challenges
•Wood Haven Road-Area Analysis
•Old Mountain Road Analysis
•Recommendation
16
Background
Through Truck: A truck that traverses a roadway on which it has
neither an origin nor destination.
A truck is not considered to be a Through Truck when it has
either an origin or a destination on a particular roadway.
17
Background
Unless prohibited, trucks are permitted to travel all public streets.
Process to restrict through trucks on a secondary street:
1.Local governing body holds a public hearing and adopts a resolution formally requesting VDOT place a restriction on a given section of roadway.
2.Request is forwarded to the VDOT Resident Administrator for review and processing.
3.VDOT Commissioner approves requests on secondary roadways.
Roanoke County can initiate this process at any time.
18
9 month
process
Background
VDOT Considerations:
1.A reasonable alternative route is provided
2.Character/frequency of the truck traffic on the route is not compatible with the affected area
3.Roadway is residential in nature
4.Roadway must be functionally classified as either local or collector
If 1, 2 and 3 or 1, 2 and 4 are not satisfied, then the request will be denied.
19
Through Truck Restrictions: Existing and Under Review
Under Review
Existing
Enforcement Challenges
1.Route 116 Existing Restriction
(established December 2010)
•VDOT counts just south of Sterling Road:
•95 tractor trailers over four days (10/31/18
to 11/3/18)
•Fail to Obey Signs Penalty:
•$30 ticket + $71 court costs = $101
•Some trucks go to Aerospace Testing
Corporation and are not “through” trucks
21
Existing Sign at Mount Pleasant Fire Station
Enforcement Challenges
2.GPS routing
•Dedicated truck GPS units include limitations such as through truck restrictions.
•Inappropriate GPS routing is an issue; County Police have found that many truckers do not use truck GPS units and may use Google Maps or other automobile-focused apps for routing instead.
22
Garmin dezl includes customized truck routing
Enforcement Challenges
3.Safe pull over locations suitable for trucks are hard to find
4.Staffing
23
Wood Haven Road-Area Analysis
2013 –September 2019 Roanoke County Vehicle Crash Data
1.61 total crashes on Wood Haven Road, Thirlane Road,
Valleypointe Parkway and a portion of Green Ridge Road
2.Crash types:
•Property Damage = 47
•Personal Injury = 14
•Fatalities = 0
3.There have been no truck crashes on the routes under review.
24
2019 VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume Estimates & Truck Counts
Old Mountain Road Analysis
2013 –September 2019 Roanoke County Vehicle Crash Data
1.14 crashes on Old Mountain Road
2.Crash types:
•Property Damage = 8
•Personal Injury = 6
•Fatalities = 0
3.There have been no truck crashes on the route under review.
26
27
2018 VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume Estimates & 2019 Truck Counts
Recommendation
If there is an identified safety/geometry issue on a roadway
and there are documented significant truck volumes with very
few likely destinations on that roadway
and VDOT’s through truck restriction considerations are met,
then the Board of Supervisors could consider requesting
through truck restrictions for that roadway.
28
Questions
29
30
Page 1 of 3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. K.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE RVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Lewis Gale Medical Center to rezone
approximately 1.44 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential
District, District to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District for
a medical office – free standing emergency room, located at
1423 West Ruritan Road, Hollins Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson
Acting Director of Planning
APPROVED BY: Daniel R. O’Donnell
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances to rezone property
from residential to commercial.
BACKGROUND:
· Lewis Gale Medical Center is seeking to construct a 9,410 square foot
freestanding emergency room at 1423 West Ruritan Road.
· The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance classifies this use as a medical office.
Medical office is not a permitted use in the R-1, Low Density Residential, District,
but is a permitted use in the C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District.
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on October 1, 2019.
Ten citizens spoke on the rezoning request during the public hearing. Eight citizens
spoke in opposition to the request. Their concerns included the location of bedrock
near the surface, location of the borings from the geotechnical study, blasting during
construction and damage to adjacent homes, site location, traffic concerns including
traffic congestion, traffic accidents, U-turns at the traffic light, and sight distance issues
Page 2 of 3
on West Ruritan, noise from ambulance sirens, dumpster location, 24/7 operation, and
continued encroachment into a residential area.
Two citizens spoke in support of the rezoning request during the public hearing. Their
comments included that this use would be a benefit to the Bonsack area, and that the
medical center would not generate a lot of traffic compared to other uses.
The Planning Commission discussed the geotechnical study including different boring
locations and results, stormwater management, the traffic impact study, the added right -
turn lane on West Ruritan, traffic accidents, the number of ambulance trips, the
anticipated service area for the medical center, noise associated with ambulance sirens,
wastes, C-1 uses, use is consistent with the Transition land use designation, and the
minimal impact associated with this use.
The applicant agreed to proffer that the re would be no blasting associated with the
construction of this site.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1 to C-
1 with proffered conditions dealing with substantial conformance with the concept plan
and architectural rendering, private ambulance service to transport patients from the
medical center to the hospital, and that no blasting will be utilized in development of the
site.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to
rezone approximately 1.44 acres from R-1 to C-1 with the following four proffered
conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Lewis -Gale FSED
Rezoning Concept Plan prepared by Crunk Engineering, LLC and dated August 9,
2019, subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site
plan review process.
2. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance with th e architectural
rendering for the Lewis-Gale Freestanding Emergency Room filed with the
application subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the
building plan review process.
Page 3 of 3
3. The applicant shall have an agreement with a private a mbulance company to
provide transportation for patients of the facility who require transfer to a hospital
when the free-standing emergency facility is open to the public and operating.
4. No blasting will be conducted on the property during the excavatio n, grading and
preparation of the site and the construction of the building and other improvements.
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Crunk Engineering – Lewis Gale Medical Center
Request: To rezone approximately 1.44 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to
C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District, to construct a medical office (freestanding
emergency room)
Conditions: accordance with the Layout Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan and Architectural
Rendering which are filed with and made a part of this Application to Rezone.
2. The Applicant will contract with a private ambulance company to maintain an
ambulance to be immediately available, at all of the times during which the free-
standing emergency department is open to the public and operating, to provide
transportation for patients of the facility who require transfer to a hospital.
Lewis Gale Medical Center is seeking to construct a 9,410 square foot freestanding emergency room at 1423 West
Ruritan Road. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance classifies this use as a medical office. The property is at the
corner of West Ruritan Road and Challenger Avenue and is currently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District.
This site is designated as Transition on the future land use map in the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. The Transition
designation is an area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas
generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development.
Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for
office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
provide diagnoses, minor surgical care and outpatient care on a routine basis, but which does not provide
overnight care or serve as a base for an ambulance service. Medical offices are operated by doctors,
dentists, or similar practitioners licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia.”
Medical office is not a permitted use in the R-1, Low Density Residential, District’ but is a permitted use in
the C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District.
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background – There is currently an existing vacant single-family dwelling centered on the property. The
Topography/Vegetation – The site rises in elevation approximately 40 feet (1030 feet to 1070 feet) from the
front of the property along Challenger Avenue to the rear of the property. The site is generally open with a
grass lawn and approximately 12-15 trees scattered throughout the site. There is a significant drainage
Surrounding Neighborhood – Surrounding land uses include single family residences to the north and west
(across West Ruritan Road), commercial uses (Chick-fil-A Restaurant and a dry cleaner) to the southwest
across West Ruritan Road, a commercial use (CVS Pharmacy) to the south across Challenger Avenue, and
vacant commercial property to the east. Properties to the north and west are zoned R-1, Low Density
Commercial, properties to the southwest, south and east are zoned C-1, Low Density Commercial, and C-2,
High Density Commercial.
3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture – The submitted plans and rendering show a proposed a one-story building
approximately 9,410 square feet in size. The building is situated perpendicular to West Ruritan Road. The
proposed parking area includes 47 spaces. The concept plan also shows extensive landscaping, including
the required Type B buffer with a 6-foot privacy fence on the side and rear property lines along the adjacent
residential properties. The property will also include numerous retaining walls and a dumpster. Underground
stormwater management is also proposed and shown on the submitted site plans. The proposed building in
similar in design to the Cave Spring Lewis Gale Freestanding Emergency Room based on the submitted
architectural rendering. The applicant has proffered substantial accordance with the layout plan, grading
Access/Traffic Circulation – The site is designed with one main access point off of West Ruritan Road. A
right turn lane is proposed on West Ruritan, to extend to the proposed entrance of the site, approximately
50 feet north of the existing Chick-fil-A entrance. The one lane drive thru lane, for patient drop off and pick
up, follows the outer perimeter of the layout with majority of the parking in the center and adjacent to West
Ruritan Road and Challenger Avenue.
VDOT - A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) was required as part of this application. The study area
encompassed the section of Route 460 from just west of the signalized intersection at Blue Hills
Drive/Mexico Way to east of the intersection at Valley Gateway Boulevard. The study area also included the
section of West Ruritan Road from south of the intersection at Route 460 to north of the existing Chick-fil-A
entrance. The analysis included a description of the proposed medical office development, discussion of the
existing and projected traffic volumes in the above-mentioned study area, quantification of the number of
trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed development, level of service and queuing analyses, and
an investigation of potential geometric improvements. In addition, AM and PM weekday peak hour periods
were analyzed. The TIA recommends the construction of a right turn lane and taper along West Ruritan
Road to tie into the proposed entrance. VDOT has reviewed the TIA and issued a concurrence letter on
Western VA Water Authority – No comments were received.
Office of Building Safety – The Office of Building Safety indicated: “All construction will need to meet the
requirements of the applicable Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code”.
Fire & Rescue - The Roanoke County Fire Marshal, Brian Simmons, has the following comments:
“1. The addition of a new free standing ER has the potential to increase 911 emergency responses to this
hospital. An increase in emergency calls does have an impact for the community as it will require additional
services to maintain current service levels.
2. Added traffic at this intersection has the potential to create more vehicle accidents and could increase
calls for service.
3. I have received a letter from Ron Roop, who lives at 1431 West Ruritan Road, who has objected to any
blasting that may occur. There is a potential that rock is on site and blasting would have to occur. An
objection to blasting would not be grounds to not let it occur, but if blasting is needed, added measures and
meetings to discuss the procedures would need to be put into place to ensure compliance and handle any
complaints.
4. All site access and fire flow requirements would need to be addressed.”
consistent with the transition future land use designation, and is appropriately located at a signalized
intersection on a high traffic commercial corridor. Lewis Gale is a taxable corporate entity, and this project
represents a significant contribution to the County’s economic and employment base. Lewis Gale has
previously demonstrated the quality of their development with the launch of their first standalone facility on
Route 419, providing a benchmark for this rezoning. Further, this project will bring needed high-quality
emergency care to a growing residential and commercial area of Roanoke County”.
Community Meeting - A community meeting was held September 16, 2019 at Bonsack Elementary School.
Approximately 30 citizens attended the meeting as well as a number of Lewis Gale representatives. County
staff, the engineer for the petitioner, and an engineer from VDOT were available for questions. Majority of
the questions involved traffic concerns and access issues off of West Ruritan Road. Additional concerns
raised were location questions/other properties considered, as well as noise concerns from the ambulance
sirens. Concerns were also raised about the potential of shale rock/bed rock on the property and specific
questions regarding construction of the site, if the petition is approved.
Additional information was requested by staff as a result of this meeting and is provided as part of this
application packet. This includes VDOT accident data near the intersection of West Ruritan Road and
Challenger Avenue as well as a geotechnical report.
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
This site is in conformance with the Transition area of the Future Land Use Map from the 2005 Community
Plan. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway parcels.
Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower
intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition
areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses.
Across Challenger Avenue from this site, the future land use designation is Core, which is appropriate for
larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based shopping facilities and includes the Bonsack
Kroger and CVS Pharmacy.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
Lewis Gale Medical Center is seeking to construct a 9,410 square foot freestanding emergency room at
Use designation of the property. The proposed site layout shows location of the building, circulation
patterns, parking and the required landscaping and screening. The proposed landscaping and screening
shown on the plan should mitigate most of the visual impact of the facility on the adjacent property owners.
Traffic was a major concern raised by the citizens at the Community Meeting. A traffic impact analysis was
prepared for this rezoning request. The TIA recommends a right turning lane and taper along West Ruritan
Road which has been incorporated into the concept plan. VDOT has issued a concurrence letter on the
traffic impact analysis. The issue of bedrock being on site and the possibility of blasting during construction
was raised during the community meeting. A geotechnical report was submitted on September 26, 2019,
and is included as an attachment to this report. The applicant has submitted two proffered conditions. The
first one deals with developing the site in substantial conformance with the plans and rendering that were
submitted with the application. The second proffer deals with providing ambulance service during operating
hours to transport patients from the freestanding emergency room to the hospital.
Application
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
Future Land Use Map
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Summary
R-1, Low Density Residential District Standards
C-1, Low Intensity General Commercial District Standards
Route 460 and Route 11 Collision Diagram, dated 9/17/2019
Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Analysis
1423 W. Rur itan Ro ad
Ro ano ke Co unty, Va 2019, So ur c e: Esri, DigitalGlo be, Geo Eye, Ear thstar Geo gr aphic s,
0 145 Feet 290 580 CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Aer o GRID, IGN, and the GIS User Co mmunity,
Date: 8/27/2019 1:4,514 Ro ano ke Co unty 2018
Aerial View
Lewis Gale Emergency
Room
1423 W. Ruritan Road
Roanoke, VA 24012
Existing Zoning: R-1
Proposed Zoning: C-1
Tax Map Number:
050.05-01-06.00-0000
Existing lot size: 1.44
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Subject Site
(540) 772-2068
5204 Bernard Dr.
Kroger
CVS
Chick-fil-A
RR33CC
RR11
1423 W. Ruritan Road
CC22SS
CC22
Zoning
CC11SS
CC22CCSS
C1
C2
CC22CC
I1
R1
R3
R4
Feet 0 145 290 580 RR44CC
Date: 8/27/2019 1:4,514 Roanoke County, Virginia 2019
II11
Zoning Map
Lewis Gale Emergency
Room
1423 W. Ruritan Road
Roanoke, VA 24012
Existing Zoning: R-1
Proposed Zoning: C-1
Tax Map Number:
050.05-01-06.00-0000
Existing lot size: 1.44
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Subject Site
1423 W. Ru r itan Road
NC
TR
CO
Future Land Use
Neighborhood Conservation
Transition
Core PI
Pr incipa l Industr ial
Feet 0 145 290 580
Date: 8/27/2019 1:4,514 Roanoke Cou nty, Vir ginia 2019
Future Land Use Map
Lewis Gale Emergency
Room
1423 W. Ruritan Road
Roanoke, VA 24012
Existing Zoning: R-1
Proposed Zoning: C-1
Tax Map Number:
050.05-01-06.00-0000
Existing lot size: 1.44
Magisterial District:
Hollins
Subject Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
For Lewis-Gale FSED Facility
on W. Ruritan Drive at US 460
in Roanoke County, Virgina
Prepared for: Crunk Engineering, LLC
July 19, 2019
Revised: August 2, 2019
Commission No.: 3982
CONTACT:
Wm. Thomas Austin, P.E., Principal in Charge
540.345.9342 wtaustin@matternandcraig.com
CONTACT:
Michael S. Agee, P.E., Principal in Charge
540.345.9342 msagee@matternandcraig.com
701 First St., S.W., Roanoke, VA 24016 matternandcraig.com.
.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Lewis-Gale FSED Facility Development
On Route 460
Roanoke County, VA
Prepared For: Crunk Engineering, LLC
1894 General George Patton Drive, Ste. 600
Franklin, TN 37067
July 19, 2019
Revised: August 2, 2019
Commission No. 3982
701 FIRST STREET, S.W.
ROANOKE, VA 24016
(540) 345-9342
FAX: (540) 345-7691
msagee@matternandcraig.com
8-2-2019
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering
DEVELOPMENT OF LEWIS-GALE FSED FACILITY
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document presents the results of the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed development
located in the northeast corner of the existing signalized intersection of Route 460 (Challenger Avenue)
and W. Ruritan Road in east Roanoke County, VA. Route 460 is a four-lane divided highway serving as
the main thoroughfare for daily commuters to and from the City of Roanoke. Existing W. Ruritan Road is
a two lane collector street with a right turn lane at the southbound approach to the intersection of W.
Ruritan Road and Route 460.
Lewis-Gale Regional Health System proposes to construct a 9,410 square foot Free-Standing Emergency
Department (FSED) facility on the 1.45 Ac site on W. Ruritan Road. Access will be from W. Ruritan
Road, opposite and approximately 50 feet north of the existing Chick-fil-A entrance. The proposed
development is assumed to be completed in 2020. This study analyzes the traffic impacts the proposed
development will have on the surrounding roadway network. The study area network to be analyzed
includes the intersections of Route 460 at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way, Route 460 at Valley Gateway
Boulevard, Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road, W. Ruritan Road at the existing Chick-fil-A entrance, and W.
Ruritan Road at the proposed site entrance.
The study analyzes 2019 Existing traffic volumes, 2020 Background traffic volumes, and 2020 Buildout
traffic volumes. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) provided existing traffic volume
data, dated April 2017, for the Route 460 intersections at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way, W. Ruritan
Road, and Valley Gateway Boulevard. Additionally, 12-hour traffic counts were collected in May 2019 at
the Route 460 intersection with W. Ruritan Road and at the existing W. Ruritan Road Chick-fil-A
entrance. Trip generation for this study was determined using the ITE Trip Generation Manual values.
Due to the small number of trips generated by the proposed development, the 2020 Buildout Year and
Design Year conditions are considered to be equivalent.
Additionally, the study analyzes all scenarios assuming that a coordinated traffic signal system is in
operation within the Route 460 corridor, which includes the three signalized intersections analyzed in the
study area. VDOT provided the traffic signal system analysis models for the corridor; including both the
existing conditions model and the future conditions model upon implementation of the corridor signal
coordination system. Per VDOT request, the signal coordination system is assumed to be in place in the
corridor for the analyses in this report.
After analyzing the study network as described above, the following recommendation is offered:
1. Consider constructing a right turn lane/taper at the northbound approach to the proposed entrance
on W. Ruritan Road. A potential right turn taper should begin at the end of the Route 460 corner
radius and a potential right turn lane should extend to the proposed entrance to the FSED facility.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering
RESPONSE TO VDOT COMMENTS – July 24, 2019
COMMENT 1.) Tables 6.2 & 6.3 - it is VDOT's recommended practice to use methodologies that are
pulled from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) guidelines. With the split phasing at the intersection of Route
460 and W Ruritan Road, it is recommended to use HCM 2000 methodology throughout. The Lanes, Volumes,
Timings methodology is not a recommended or approved practice to obtain delays and level of service for the
intersection. For unsignalized intersections, it is recommended to utilize HCM 2000 methodology to keep the reports
consistent.
RESPONSE:
The Lanes, Volumes, Timings Methodology, used for the TIA report dated 7/19/19, was selected based on
the PDF reports provided with VDOT Synchro files. Synchro report methodology has been changed to
HCM 2000 throughout for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. New Synchro and SimTraffic
reports have been generated. Appendices and appropriate tables have been updated accordingly.
COMMENT 2.) Tables 7.1 & 7.2 - SimTraffic Analysis - the tables only looked at the northbound approach of the
intersection of W Ruritan Road and the Chick-fil-A entrance. It has been suggested to add the intersections of Route
460 at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way, Route 460 at W Ruritan Road and Route 460 at Valley Gateway Blvd and also
the intersection of W Ruritan Road at the site entrance. It is generally VDOT's preference to obtain the maximum
queues instead of the 95th percentile queues when analyzing the approaches to see if the queues back up through the
upstream intersections.
RESPONSE:
Table numbering has been revised. Table 7.1 and Table 7.2 have become Table 7.2 and Table 7.3,
respectively. A new table has been inserted as Table 7.1 listing locations for queuing to be analyzed,
including the VDOT requested intersections. For the Route 460 intersections, only those movements that
experience an increase in traffic due to the proposed development are included.
Per VDOT request, appropriate tables have been updated to reflect maximum queue lengths.
COMMENT 3.) It is generally VDOT's preference to utilize the Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Manual
(TOSAM) methodology when obtaining the queues in SimTraffic. There shall be a 15-minute seeding period and
four 15-minute recording intervals. One interval should be set to Yes for PHF Adjust and three intervals should be
set to Yes for AntiPHF Adjust. Revise the tables.
RESPONSE:
The Calibration settings utilized previously correctly reflect the PHF Adjust and AntiPHF Adjust settings
described. The seeding interval durations that were utilized were developed based on network travel times
during each peak hour in accordance with TOSAM guidance. Per VDOT request, the seeding interval
duration was updated to 15 minutes and the simulations were re-run. New SimTraffic reports have been
generated. Appendices and appropriate tables are updated accordingly.
COMMENT 4.) There should be a note on the report stating that the signal at the intersection of Route 460 and W
Ruritan Road is currently operating freely and the queues on W Ruritan Road approach will not be an issue. But as
VDOT is working to implement the coordination throughout the network on Route 460, the queues on W Ruritan
Road will back up through the Chick-fil-A entrance. With the additional volumes from the development, the queues
will only increase by several feet during the peak hours based on the coordinated network throughout Route 460 and
are not adversely affected by the development.
RESPONSE:
The requested information has been added to section 7.1.1.1. Based on the results of the analysis, it is
noted that the queues remain virtually unchanged.
Vanessa T. W. Hobson
From:Blevins, Brian <brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent:Thursday, August 1, 2019 3:06 PM
To:Michael S. Agee; Vanessa T. W. Hobson
Cc:Philip Thompson; Crunk Will (will@crunkeng.com); Catherine Bowman
Subject:Fwd: 3982 - Revised Lewis-Gale FSED TIA
Mike/Vanessa,
Please see the e-mail from our traffic operations group below. As noted, the report does not require any
additional review based on the comments.
Please send two hard copies to my office for our files. I will send a concurrence letter as soon as the hard
copy has been received.
Thanks,
Brian K. Blevins, P.E.
Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use
Salem Residency
Virginia Department of Transportation
714 South Broad Street
Salem, VA 24153
e-mail: brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov
Phone: 540-387-5502
Cell: 540-491-3774
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Rodgers, James <james.rodgers@vdot.virginia.gov>
Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: 3982 - Revised Lewis-Gale FSED TIA
To: Blevins, Brian <brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov>
Cc: John Bisnett <john.bisnett@vdot.virginia.gov>, Catherine Bowman <catherine.bowman@vdot.virginia.gov>,
Philip Thompson <PTHOMPSON@roanokecountyva.gov>
Brian,
The Specialty Services Group has reviewed the 2nd submission and have a couple of minor comments that will not
affect the report. Therefore, no resubmission is required on our end.
In the SimTraffic reports, there are queues exceeding link distances at the westbound approach of Route 460 at the
intersection of Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way and the queues are provided at the bend area. Please add in the queues
from the bend to provide realistic queues.
Tables 7.2 & 7.3 – the tables need to add the SimTraffic queues for all critical movements for the existing AM & PM
scenarios for the purposes of comparison.
Also, please do not hesitate to let me or John Bisnett know if the consultant has any further questions on our comments.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:14 AM Blevins, Brian <brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov> wrote:
John,
Please see the revised report in the link and attachments below for your second review. Please let me
know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Brian K. Blevins, P.E.
Assistant Resident Engineer/Land Use
Salem Residency
Virginia Department of Transportation
714 South Broad Street
Salem, VA 24153
e-mail: brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov
Phone: 540-387-5502
Cell: 540-491-3774
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Brian Blevins <bkb1975@cox.net>
Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:11 AM
Subject: Fwd: 3982 - Revised Lewis-Gale FSED TIA
To: <brian.blevins@vdot.virginia.gov>
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Vanessa T. W. Hobson" <vthobson@matternandcraig.com>
Date: Jul 30, 2019 3:28 PM
Subject: 3982 - Revised Lewis-Gale FSED TIA
To: Brian Blevins <bkb1975@cox.net>
Cc: "'will@crunkeng.com'" <will@crunkeng.com>,"Michael S. Agee " <msagee@matternandcraig.com>
Brian,
Please find below a link to download the Revised Lewis-Gale FSED TIA report. The revised report addresses your
previously provided comments, dated 7/24/2019. The comments and response to comments are included within the
TIA report following the Executive Summary.
Revised TIA download link:
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A9c4572ec-2bd6-48b4-b39d-
56c55e933fe1
Please find attached the Synchro and SimTraffic files used for the analysis.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering
RESPONSE TO VDOT COMMENTS – August 1, 2019
COMMENT 1.) In the SimTraffic reports, there are queues exceeding link distances at the westbound approach of
Route 460 at the intersection of Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way and the queues are provided at the bend area.
Please add in the queues from the bend to provide realistic queues.
RESPONSE:
Appendices and appropriate tables have been updated accordingly.
COMMENT 2.) Tables 7.2 & 7.3 – the tables need to add the SimTraffic queues for all critical movements for the
existing AM & PM scenarios for the purposes of comparison.
RESPONSE:
Table 7.2 and Table 7.3 have been revised and Appendix E has been updated accordingly. Please note that
page numbering has been revised starting on page 22.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering
Contents
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Proposed Development ..................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Existing Volumes .............................................................................................................................. 2
4.0 Background Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................ 9
5.0 Projected Development Volumes ...................................................................................................... 9
5.1 Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................................... 9
5.2 Buildout Year Volumes ................................................................................................................ 9
6.0 Traffic Operations Analysis ............................................................................................................ 18
6.1 Level of Service .......................................................................................................................... 18
6.2 Specific Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................... 20
6.2.1 Coordinated Signal Network Analysis ................................................................................ 20
6.2.2 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Mexico Way/Blue Hills Drive ............................. 21
6.2.3 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road .................................................. 21
6.2.4 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Valley Gateway Boulevard .................................. 21
6.2.5 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at Chick-fil-A Entrance ............................. 21
6.2.6 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at FSED Entrance ..................................... 21
7.0 SimTraffic Queue Length Analyses ................................................................................................ 22
7.1 Scenario Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 25
7.1.1 Background and Buildout Intersection Analysis ................................................................. 25
8.0 Geometric Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 26
8.1 Sight Distance ............................................................................................................................. 26
8.2 Corner Clearance ........................................................................................................................ 30
8.3 Turn Lane Warrants .................................................................................................................... 30
8.3.1 Left Turn Lane Warrants ..................................................................................................... 30
8.3.2 Right Turn Lane Warrants .................................................................................................. 30
9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................... 31
9.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 31
9.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 31
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 - Site Specific Location Map ....................................................................................................... 1
Figure 3.1 – 2017 Counts Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour………………………………………………..3
Figure 3.2 – 2017 Counts Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour………………………………………………...4
Figure 3.3 – 2019 Counts Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour………………………………………………..5
Figure 3.4 – 2019 Counts Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour………………………………………………...6
Figure 3.5 – Existing Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour...……..……………………………………………7
Figure 3.6 – Existing Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour……..………………………………………………8
Figure 4.1 - Background AM Peak Hour Traffic…………………………………………………………. 10
Figure 4.2 - Background PM Peak Hour Traffic ……………………………………………………….... 11
Figure 5.1 - Trip Distribution AM Peak Hour …………………………………………………………… 12
Figure 5.2 - Trip Distribution PM Peak Hour ….………………………………………………………… 13
Figure 5.3 - Trip Generation AM Peak Hour …..………………………………………………………… 14
Figure 5.4 - Trip Generation PM Peak Hour …...…………………………………………………………15
Figure 5.5 - 2020 Buildout Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour …….……………………………………… 16
Figure 5.6 - 2020 Buildout Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour …….……………………………………… 17
Figure 8.1 – Intersection Sight Distance – Exiting ………….…………………………………………… 27
Figure 8.2 – Intersection Sight Distance – Entering ………….………………………………………..… 28
Figure 8.3 – Stopping Sight Distance – Entering ………….…………………………………………..… 29
List of Tables
Table 5.1 - Trip Generation Summary .......................................................................................................... 9
Table 6.1 - Level of Service (LOS) and Delay ........................................................................................... 18
Table 6.2 –Level of Service and Delay AM Peak Hour ............................................................................. 19
Table 6.3 –Level of Service and Delay PM Peak Hour .............................................................................. 20
Table 7.1 – Critical Locations for Queue Analysis ..................................................................................... 22
Table 7.2 – Queue Lengths AM Peak Hour ................................................................................................ 23
Table 7.3 – Queue Lengths PM Peak Hour ................................................................................................ 24
Appendices
Appendix A – Preliminary Site Plan
Appendix B – Traffic Count Data
Appendix C – Trip Generation
Appendix D – Synchro Reports
Appendix E – SimTraffic Reports
Appendix F – Excerpts
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 1
1.0 Introduction
Mattern & Craig, Inc. was commissioned by Crunk Engineering, LLC, the site development engineer, to
perform a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the redevelopment and rezoning of the site located in the
northeast corner of the intersection of Route 460 (Challenger Avenue) and W. Ruritan Road in Roanoke
County, VA. Figure 1.1 depicts the location of the proposed development and the surrounding area.
The study area encompasses the section of Route 460 from just west of the signalized intersection at Blue
Hills Drive/Mexico Way to east of the intersection at Valley Gateway Boulevard. The study area also
includes the section of W. Ruritan Road from south of the intersection at Route 460 to north of the
existing Chick-fil-A entrance, including an existing full-access entrance to the site. This section of Route
460 is a principal arterial consisting of a four-lane section with a divided median and has a posted speed
limit of 45 mph except in the vicinity of the Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way intersection where the posted
speed limit is 40 mph. W. Ruritan Road consists of two lanes, with a separate right-turn lane onto Route
460, and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The surrounding area is a combination of commercial and
residential developments.
Figure 1.1 - Site Specific Location Map
This report includes a description of the proposed development, discussion of existing and projected
traffic volumes in the study area, quantification of the number of trips anticipated to be generated by the
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 2
proposed development, level of service and queuing analyses, and an investigation of potential geometric
improvements. This study will analyze two weekday peak hour periods: AM and PM.
2.0 Proposed Development
The proposed development is a Free-Standing Emergency Department (FSED) facility. The FSED facility
will have a gross floor area of 9,410 square feet. The development will have one site access point on W.
Ruritan Road just north of the existing Chick-fil-A entrance. The development is assumed to be
completed in year 2020. The preliminary site plan is included in Appendix A.
3.0 Existing Volumes
Turning movement counts were collected on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 between the hours of 7:00 AM –
7:00 PM at the signalized intersections of Route 460 at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way, W. Ruritan Road,
and Valley Gateway Boulevard. These turning movement counts, included in Appendix B, were collected
by Peggy Malone & Associates and were provided to Mattern & Craig by VDOT. The 2017 turning
movement counts were utilized by VDOT to develop a corridor signal system model utilizing Synchro
traffic analysis software. VDOT used the corridor signal system model to determine traffic signal design
modifications to coordinate and optimize the Route 460 corridor, including the three signalized
intersections in the study area. Per VDOT request, the coordinated traffic signal system design that is to
be implemented is assumed to be in place under both existing and proposed conditions for the purpose of
this study. The corridor signal system model established an AM peak hour of 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM and a
PM peak hour of 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. For the purposes of this report, the corridor peak hours will be
used as the AM and PM peak hours at each study intersection. Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 depict the
turning movements in the AM and PM peak hours from the 2017 traffic counts.
Additional turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, May 9, 2019 between the hours of 6:30
AM – 6:30 PM at the signalized intersection of Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road and at the unsignalized
partial-access Chick-fil-A entrance on W. Ruritan Road. These turning movement counts were collected
by The Traffic Group, a sub-consultant to Mattern & Craig. The 2019 traffic counts are included in
Appendix B. For consistency with the VDOT synchro model, U-turns are combined with left turns for a
total left turning volume except at the Valley Gateway Boulevard intersection where eastbound U-turns
are the only permitted left turn movement. Figure 3.3 and Figure 3.4 depict the turning movements in the
AM and PM peak hours from the 2019 traffic counts.
A process was established to incorporate the 2019 traffic data and the 2017 traffic data into updated
Existing traffic data. At the Route 460/W. Ruritan Road intersection and at the W. Ruritan Road/Chick-
fil-A entrance, the 2019 traffic counts were utilized as the Existing volumes. It should be noted that the
prohibited left turns out of the Chick-fil-A entrance during the peak hours were redistributed as right
turns. Volume balancing was used to distribute the 2019 traffic data volumes through the adjacent Route
460 intersections at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way and Valley Gateway Boulevard, adjusting the 2017
traffic counts as required. The updated turning movements in the AM and PM peak hours, used as the
Existing volumes for the purposes of this report, are depicted in Figure 3.5 and Figure 3.6.
69
93
863
909
217
13
7 7 17 64 10
43
1536
12
2010
3
0
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
7:15AM - 8:15AM
0
AM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
16
5
0 84 81
1381
1
90
863
4
2 1 0
1390
2017 COUNTS
3. 1
FIGURE
3
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:27 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
1076
1371
1593
23
44 4 56 42
18
1126
40
26
6
10
144
14
9256
1
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
4:30PM - 5:30PM
89
95
PM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
79 1 92 111
1076
10
208
1504
30
16 3 23
2017 COUNTS
3. 2
FIGURE
4
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:28 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
7:15AM - 8:15AM
AM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
82
30
49
96
2019 COUNTS
3. 3
FIGURE
10
0
0
1
74
96 33
1471
0
16
6
1
905
3
2 0 0
19
1
5
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:30 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
4:30PM - 5:30PM
PM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
2019 COUNTS
1 96
0
0
121841 95
1234
10
1
1
1
86
10
9
14
7
21
142
1
26 3 321494
50
3. 4
FIGURE
6
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:31 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
1480
69
93
917
939
217
13
7 7 17 64 10
43
1628
12
2010
3
0
3. 5
FIGURE
0
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EXISTING
7:15AM - 8:15AM
0
AM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
10 19
1
0
8216
7
1 96
1471
0
75
96 33
79
2 0 0905
3
7
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:32 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
1245
1373
1558
23
44 4 56 42
18
1302
40
26
6
10
3. 6
FIGURE
144
14
9256
1
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EXISTING
4:30PM - 5:30PM
89
95
PM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
1 96
0
0
121861 95
1234
11
88
10
9
14
7
163
27 3 321494
50
8
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 1:29:34 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 9
4.0 Background Traffic Volumes
As mentioned previously, the proposed development is assumed to be completed in 2020. Therefore, the
2020 design year is used for analysis of impacts to the intersections in the development area. Background
traffic is that which would be anticipated to utilize the existing street network at the time the proposed
development is expected to be completed and occupied, but without the traffic generated by the new
development. A 0.5% annual traffic growth rate is used for this analysis. This growth rate was applied to
the intersections in the study area to calculate the background traffic volumes for the 2020 design year.
Background traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4.1 for the AM peak hour and Figure 4.2 for the PM
peak hour.
5.0 Projected Development Volumes
Trip generation was performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual, 10th Edition. As previously mentioned, the proposed development will consist of a Free-Standing
Emergency Department (Medical-Dental Office Building – Land Use Code 720). The FSED will have a
gross floor area of 9,410 square feet. The AM and PM peak hour trips for this land use are determined
using the fitted curve equations. These trips are summarized in Table 5.1 for the site and are detailed in
Appendix C.
Table 5.1 - Trip Generation Summary
Peak Hour Entering Exiting Total
Weekday AM (7:15 – 8:15) 21 (78%) 6 (22%) 27
Weekday PM (4:30 – 5:30) 10 (28%) 24 (72%) 34
5.1 Trip Distribution
Based on the geographical location of the proposed FSED, which will primarily serve east Roanoke
County and west Botetourt County, it is assumed the site generated traffic will come primarily from the
east in both the AM and PM peak hours. It is assumed that approximately 60% of site generated traffic
will come from the east along Route 460 and the remaining 40% will come from the west along Route
460. All traffic is assumed to enter the site from Route 460. An occasional trip may enter from the north
on W. Ruritan Road but will have insignificant impact on operations. Trip assignment throughout the
remainder of the network distributes site generated traffic along eastbound and westbound Route 460.
Trip distribution is depicted in Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2.
By combining the information from Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2 with Table 5.1, the resulting trips can be
assigned to the street network. These trips are depicted in Figure 5.3 for the AM peak hour and Figure
5.4 for the PM peak hour.
5.2 Buildout Year Volumes
The 2020 Buildout traffic volumes are determined by summing the site generated trips (Figure 5.3 and
Figure 5.4) with the Background traffic (Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2) for the weekday AM and PM peak
hours. The 2020 Buildout weekday peak hour traffic volumes are presented in Figure 5.5 for the AM
peak hour and Figure 5.6 for the PM peak hour.
4. 1
FIGURE
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
7:15AM - 8:15AM
BACKGROUND
AM PEAK HOUR
64 1093
69
2 0 0
79
3
16
8
1 96 82
1478
0
96 33
75
0
0
10
7 7 17
218
944
13
10
4
0 20 43
1636
12
910
19
2
1487
922
0
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
NOTES:
10
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:44 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
4. 2
FIGURE
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
SITE
Driveway
Exist.
44 4 56
95
23
10 89 18
40
1 96
0
0
11
86 1 95
50
27 3 32
1
42
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
4:30PM - 5:30PM
BACKGROUND
PM PEAK HOUR
26
7
1309
1566
122
1240
1501
164
1251
145
15
0257
1380
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
NOTES:
88
14
8110
11
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:45 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
47%
31%
NOTES:
5. 1
FIGURE
22%
78
%
13
%
31%13%
47%
9%
9%
CHICK-FIL-A
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
7:15AM - 8:15AM
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
AM PEAK HOUR
Land Use Code 720 Medical-Dental Office Building, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic
2. Exiting and Entering percentages based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th edition
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
12
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:47 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
17%
11%
5. 2
FIGURE
72%
28
%
29
%
43
%
11%
29%
43%
17%
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
CHICK-FIL-A
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
4:30PM - 5:30PM
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
PM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
Land Use Code 720 Medical-Dental Office Building, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic
2. Exiting and Entering percentages based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th edition
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
13
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:48 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
5. 3
FIGURE
21
6
8
13
42
2
8 4
13
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
7:15AM - 8:15AM
TRIP GENERATION
AM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
Land Use Code 720 Medical-Dental Office Building, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic
2. Trips Generated, Exiting and Entering percentages based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th edition
14
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:50 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
5. 4
FIGURE
10 14
6
4
10
24
10
4
6
14
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
4:30PM - 5:30PM
TRIP GENERATION
PM PEAK HOUR
NOTES:
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
Land Use Code 720 Medical-Dental Office Building, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic
2. Trips Generated, Exiting and Entering percentages based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th edition
15
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:51 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
5. 5
FIGURE
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
64 1093
69
2 0 0
87
3
1 95
0
75
10
7 7 17
13
0 20 43
12
96 33
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
7:15AM - 8:15AM
AM PEAK HOUR
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
NOTES:
10
4
1638
952
218
17
0
10
0
1478
910
19
2
6
0
1500
926
0
21
2020 BUILDOUT
16
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:53 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
5. 6
FIGURE
R0AD
W. RURITAN
RTE. 460
CHALLENGER AVE.
VA
LL
E
Y GA
TE
WAY
BLVD
.
CVS
MEXICO WAY
CHALLENGER AVE.
RTE. 460
BLUE HILL
S DRIVE
CHICK-FIL-A
Entrance
Prop.
SITE
44 4 56
95
23
10 89 18
40
1 96
11
96 1
50
27 3 32
1
42
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
4:30PM - 5:30PM
PM PEAK HOUR
1. Peak Hours based on VDOT corridor model
NOTES:
26
7
1319
1570
10
9 128
1240
1501
168
24
0
14
8110
88
1257
145
15
0257
1394
10
2020 BUILDOUT
17
Signalized Intersection
Legend
Unsignalized Intersection NTS 3982
COMM. NO.
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEWIS-GALE FSED
7/15/2019 2:06:54 PM
3982 Figs turning movements.dgn
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 18
6.0 Traffic Operations Analysis
Synchro traffic software was used to analyze the operational conditions for the study area for the 2019
Existing, 2020 Background, and 2020 Buildout weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions. SimTraffic
simulation software was used in conjunction with Synchro to analyze vehicle queues. The procedures
used by Synchro and SimTraffic are in accordance with the methodologies stated in the Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) for intersection analysis. Due to the split phasing at the Route 460 intersection
with W. Ruritan Road, HCM 2000 methodology was utilized throughout the analysis. SimTraffic analysis
results are summarized in Section 7.0.
As previously discussed, the coordinated traffic signal system design that VDOT is in the process of
implementing is assumed to be in place under both existing and proposed conditions for the purpose of
this study. The VDOT Synchro model for Alternative 4, the alternative being implemented, was used to
as the basis for the analysis.
6.1 Level of Service
Synchro reports operational Level of Service (LOS) at an intersection with a letter designation and with
an average delay time in seconds for vehicles stopped at the intersection. Level of service is a
quantitative measure of driver perception of delay (waiting time) experienced at an intersection, and LOS
is based on the delay thresholds specified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). LOS conditions
range from “A” (little delay) to “F” (very long delay). Table 6.1 reflects the delay ranges in seconds
drivers may experience for a corresponding level of service for both signalized and unsignalized
intersections. The criteria used to measure LOS for signalized intersections are different from the criteria
used for unsignalized intersections. LOS for signalized intersections is based on control delay per vehicle.
Control delay, as defined by HCM, includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay
and final acceleration delay. According to this definition the minimum design acceptable delay is “D” for
design purposes, particularly in a more developed area. For signalized intersections, LOS “F” indicates
that more than one signal change cycle may be required for a driver to pass through the intersection. For
unsignalized intersections, levels of service are based on critical gap, the minimum time interval in the
major street traffic stream that allows entry for one minor street vehicle from an intersection, particularly
the left turn vehicles. LOS “E” is generally considered to be the minimum design standard. At an
unsignalized intersection, LOS “F” occurs when there are not enough minimum gaps to allow the
movements on the minor street to enter the major street in a "reasonable" amount of time.
Table 6.1 - Level of Service (LOS) and Delay
Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection
LOS
Average Control Delay
per Vehicle
(seconds)
LOS
Average Control Delay
per Vehicle
(seconds)
A 0-10 A 0-10
B 10-15 B 10-20
C 15-25 C 20-35
D 25-35 D 35-55
E 35-50 E 55-80
F >50 F >80
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 19
Analysis results for signalized intersections provide level of service calculations for all approaches as well
as an overall intersection level of service. Please note that analysis results for two-way stop-controlled
unsignalized intersections do not provide level of service results for all approaches or an overall
intersection level of service, but rather a level of service for minor street movements and/or approaches
that have a conflicting major street movement. In this study, level of service is the basis for the
evaluation of existing traffic conditions and the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed site on
the study network roadways.
HCM 2000 LOS and delay for the 2019 Existing, 2020 Background, and 2020 Buildout scenarios per
intersection are tabulated in Table 6.2 and Table 6.3.
Table 6.2 –Level of Service and Delay AM Peak Hour
LOS per Movement by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Intersection Type Scenario Overall
LOS L T R L T R L T R L T R
Bl
u
e
H
i
l
l
s
D
r
.
/
Me
x
i
c
o
W
a
y
(
N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 AM
Existing
C
(23.4)
D
53.2
B
16.8
A
7.2
A
8.4
C
20.9
A
7.4 - E
62.8
E
60.3
E
55.1
E
61.6
D
42.9
C (23.4) C (20.5) E (61.5) D (52.6)
2020 AM
Background
C
(23.7)
D
(54.3)
B
(16.8)
A
(7.2)
A
(8.4)
C
(21.4)
A
(7.4) - E
(62.8)
E
(60.3)
E
(55.1)
E
(62.1)
D
(42.9)
C (23.7) C (20.9) E (61.5) D (52.9)
2020 AM
Buildout
C
(23.3)
D
(54.5)
B
(16.9)
A
(7.2)
A
(8.4)
C
(20.6)
A
(7.4) - E
(62.8)
E
(60.3)
E
(55.1)
E
(62.1)
D
(42.9)
C (23.7) C (20.1) E (61.5) D (52.9)
W.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 AM
Existing
B
(11.8)
B
19.5
A
4.3
A
6.7 - A
7.9
B
12.5 - E
66.6 - - E
59.6
D
53.3
A (5.5) A (8.2) E (66.6) E (55.6)
2020 AM
Background
B
(11.9)
B
(19.7)
A
(4.4)
A
(6.7) - A
(8.1)
B
(12.5) - E
(66.6) - - E
(59.6)
D
(53.3)
A (5.6) A (8.4) E (66.6) E (55.6)
2020 AM
Buildout
B
(12.7)
C
(21.6)
A
(4.3)
A
(6.9) - A
(9.5)
B
(13.6) - E
(66.6) - - E
(58.9)
D
(52.8)
A (5.9) A (9.7) E (66.6) E (55.1)
Va
l
l
e
y
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
B
l
v
d
.
(N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 AM
Existing
B
(10.1)
- A
5.1
A
2.6
E
67.5
A
8.6 - E
58.6 - D
49.6 - - -
A (4.9) B (11.2) E (57.4) -
2020 AM
Background
B
(10.1)
- A
(5.1)
A
(2.6)
E
(67.6)
A
(8.6) - E
(58.6) - D
(49.6) - - -
A (4.9) B (11.3) E (57.4) -
2020 AM
Buildout
B
(10.2)
- A
(4.9)
A
(3.1)
E
(68.1)
A
(8.9) - E
(58.6) - D
(49.6) - - -
A (4.7) B (11.5) E (57.4) -
Ch
i
c
k
-
f
i
l
-
A
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
(E
/
W
)
At
W
.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
Un
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 AM
Existing
A
(3.7)
- - - - - - A
9.8 - - - - A
6.0
- - A (9.8) n./a (6.0)
2020 AM
Background
A
(3.7)
- - - - - - A
(9.8) - - - - A
(6.0)
- - A (9.8) n/a (6.0)
2020 AM
Buildout
A
(3.6)
- - - - - - A
(9.8) - - - - A
(5.3)
- - A (9.8) n/a (5.3)
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
S
i
t
e
En
t
r
a
n
c
e
(
E
/
W
)
At
W
.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
Un
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 AM
Existing N/A - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
2020 AM
Background N/A - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
2020 AM
Buildout
A
(0.2)
- - - - - - - B
(10.0) - - - -
- - B (10.0) -
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 20
Table 6.3 –Level of Service and Delay PM Peak Hour
LOS per Movement by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Intersection Type Scenario Overall
LOS L T R L T R L T R L T R
Bl
u
e
H
i
l
l
s
D
r
.
/
Me
x
i
c
o
W
a
y
(
N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 PM
Existing
C
(21.9)
D
35.9
B
10.0
B
10.2
D
41.0
B
19.6
B
14.2 - F
80.1
E
64.1
E
56.4
E
76.2
D
50.7
B (11.5) C (20.1) E (71.5) E (62.0)
2020 PM
Background
C
(22.0)
D
(36.4)
B
(10.2)
B
(10.2)
D
(41.9)
B
(19.7)
B
(14.2) - F
(80.1)
E
(64.1)
E
(56.4)
E
(76.2)
D
(50.7)
B (11.7) C (20.3) E (71.5) E (62.0)
2020 PM
Buildout
C
(22.1)
D
(37.0)
B
(10.3)
B
(10.2)
D
(42.8)
B
(19.8)
B
(14.2) - F
(80.1)
E
(64.1)
E
(56.4)
E
(76.2)
D
(50.7)
B (11.8) C (20.4) E (71.5) E (62.0)
W.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 PM
Existing
B
(15.1)
B
15.4
A
8.7
A
8.8
B
12.9
B
14.8
A
0.9 - E
69.3
E
64.2 - E
67.7
E
58.3
A (9.3) B (13.5) E (66.6) E (63.2)
2020 PM
Background
B
(15.1)
B
(15.4)
A
(8.6)
A
(8.8)
B
(12.9)
B
(14.9)
A
(0.9) - E
(69.5)
E
(64.3) - E
(67.7)
E
(58.3)
A (9.2) B (13.6) E (66.8) E (63.2)
2020 PM
Buildout
B
(15.6)
B
(15.8)
A
(8.7)
A
(9.0)
B
(13.1)
B
(15.2)
A
(0.7) - E
(69.5)
E
(64.3) - E
(70.0)
E
(57.8)
A (9.4) B (13.8) E (66.8) E (64.3)
Va
l
l
e
y
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
B
l
v
d
.
(N
/
S
)
At
R
o
u
t
e
4
6
0
(
E
/
W
)
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 PM
Existing
B
(10.3)
E
57.0
A
4.3
A
1.3
F
87.6
A
2.3 - E
63.0 - D
48.6 - - -
A (3.9) B (11.1) E (59.9) -
2020 PM
Background
B
(10.3)
E
(55.8)
A
(4.2)
A
(1.2)
F
(87.1)
A
(2.3) - E
(63.1) - D
(48.6) - - -
A (3.8) B (11.1) E (59.9) -
2020 PM
Buildout
B
(10.2)
E
(58.3)
A
(4.2)
A
(1.3)
F
(85.8)
A
(2.4) - E
(63.1) - D
(48.6) - - -
A (3.8) B (11.0) E (59.9) -
Ch
i
c
k
-
f
i
l
-
A
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
(E
/
W
)
At
W
.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
Un
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 PM
Existing
A
(3.9)
- - - - - - A
9.2 - - - - A
3.6
- - A (9.2) n/a (3.6)
2020 PM
Background
A
(4.0)
- - - - - - A
(9.2) - - - - A
(3.7)
- - A (9.2) n/a (3.7)
2020 PM
Buildout
A
(3.9)
- - - - - - A
(9.2) - - - - A
(3.5)
- - A (9.2) n/a (3.5)
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
S
i
t
e
En
t
r
a
n
c
e
(
E
/
W
)
At
W
.
R
u
r
i
t
a
n
R
o
a
d
(N
/
S
)
Un
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
2019 PM
Existing N/A - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
2020 PM
Background N/A - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
2020 PM
Buildout
A
(0.9)
- - - - - - - B
(10.2) - - - -
- - B (10.2) -
See Appendix D for detailed Synchro LOS Reports for all analyses.
6.2 Specific Intersection Analysis
The following subsections discuss the data presented in Table 6.2 and Table 6.3.
6.2.1 Coordinated Signal Network Analysis
The coordinated signalized intersection network requires the intersections within the network to have
cycle lengths that may be different than their individual natural cycle lengths. Each of the three
signalized intersections must have cycle lengths that are either equal or twice as long as the adjacent
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 21
intersection for coordination. The goal of the coordinated system is to facilitate the major movement
during each peak hour. In doing so, traffic on the minor approaches are sacrificed and experience lower
LOS. The approaches are timed so that the dominant direction experiences the greater free-flow through
the system. As mentioned previously, the existing, background and buildout scenarios represent the
operation of the intersections with the implementation of the VDOT signal modification project.
Synchro .syn files accompany this report for each analysis. Additionally, PDF files of the Synchro and
SimTraffic reports accompany this report for each analysis in Appendix D and Appendix E, respectively.
6.2.2 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Mexico Way/Blue Hills Drive
The signalized intersection of Route 460 at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way experiences poor LOS under
the 2019 Existing conditions and subsequently under the 2020 Background conditions. Under Existing
conditions, the intersection is over capacity (LOS E) for the northbound approach in the AM peak hour
and for both the northbound and southbound approaches in the PM peak hour. It should be noted that site
generated traffic is not expected to affect the northbound and southbound approaches. Delay times at this
intersection increase slightly with the addition of the site generated traffic, but site generated traffic has
little overall effect on this intersection. The intersection experiences an overall LOS of C in both the AM
and PM peak hours under Existing, Background, and Buildout conditions.
6.2.3 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road
The signalized intersection of Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road experiences poor LOS under the 2019
Existing conditions and subsequently under the 2020 Background conditions. Under Existing conditions,
the intersection is over capacity (LOS E) for both the northbound and southbound approaches in both the
AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that site generated traffic is not expected to affect the
northbound approach. Delay times at this intersection increase slightly with the addition of the site
generated traffic, but site generated traffic has little overall effect on this intersection. The intersection
experiences an overall LOS of B in both the AM and PM peak hours under Existing, Background, and
Buildout conditions.
6.2.4 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Valley Gateway Boulevard
The signalized intersection of Route 460 at Valley Gateway Boulevard experiences poor LOS under the
2019 Existing conditions and subsequently under the 2020 Background conditions. Under Existing
conditions, the intersection is over capacity (LOS E) for the northbound approach in both the AM and PM
peak hours. It should be noted that site generated traffic is not expected to affect the northbound
approach. Delay times increase slightly with the addition of the site generated traffic, but overall, the site
generated traffic has little effect on this intersection. The intersection experiences an overall LOS of B in
both the AM and PM peak hours under Existing, Background, and Buildout conditions.
6.2.5 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at Chick‐fil‐A Entrance
The unsignalized intersection of W. Ruritan Road at the Chick-fil-A Entrance experiences an acceptable
LOS in both the AM and PM peak hours under the 2019 Existing, 2020 Background, and 2020 Buildout
conditions.
6.2.6 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at FSED Entrance
The unsignalized intersection of W. Ruritan Road at the proposed FSED Entrance experiences an
acceptable LOS for both AM and PM peak hours under the 2020 Buildout conditions.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 22
7.0 SimTraffic Queue Length Analyses
Queue lengths were analyzed at critical locations within the study area. Outside of the immediate vicinity
of the proposed FSED entrance, only those movements that experience an increase in traffic due to the
proposed development are included as critical locations. The critical locations considered for this study
are shown below in Table 7.1. See Appendix E for detailed SimTraffic queue reports.
Table 7.1 – Critical Locations for Queue Analysis
Intersection Movement
Route 460 at
Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way
Eastbound Thru (EB T)
Westbound Thru (WB T)
Route 460 at Bend
East of Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way Westbound Thru (WB T)
Route 460 at
W. Ruritan Road
Eastbound Left (EB L)
Westbound Right (WB R)
Southbound Left-Thru (SB LT)
Southbound Right (SB R)
Route 460 at
Valley Gateway Blvd
Eastbound Thru (EB T)
Westbound Thru (WB T)
W. Ruritan Road at
Chick-fil-A Entrance
Northbound Left-Thru (NB LT)
Southbound Thru-Right (SB TR)
W. Ruritan Road at
Proposed FSED Entrance
Southbound Left-Thru (SB LT)
Westbound Left-Right (WB LR)
Table 7.2 and Table 7.3 provide a summary of the critical movement’s resultant maximum queue length
in relation to the storage length available at each location for all existing, background, and buildout traffic
scenarios. The results displayed are the average results across 10 microsimulation runs.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 23
Table 7.2 – Queue Lengths AM Peak Hour
Intersection Movement Scenario Queue Length
(ft)
Available Storage
Length (ft)
Route 460 at
Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way
EB T
2019 Existing 348 2253L
2020 Background 319 2253L
2020 Buildout 343 2253 L
WB T
2019 Existing 557 B+ 507 B
2020 Background 688 B+ 507 B
2020 Buildout 652 B+ 507 B
Route 460 at
W. Ruritan Road
EB L
2019 Existing 134 415 SB
2020 Background 133 415 SB
2020 Buildout 148 415 SB
WB R
2019 Existing 176 232 SB
2020 Background 195 232 SB
2020 Buildout 176 232 SB
SB LT
2019 Existing 180 173 L
2020 Background 185 173 L
2020 Buildout 184 173 L
SB R
2019 Existing 163 165 SB
2020 Background 164 165 SB
2020 Buildout 163 165 SB
Route 460 at
Valley Gateway Boulevard
EB T
2019 Existing 246 754 L
2020 Background 257 754 L
2020 Buildout 282 754 L
WB T
2019 Existing 202 5103 L
2020 Background 217 5103 L
2020 Buildout 206 5103 L
W. Ruritan Road at
Chick-fil-A Entrance
SB TR
2019 Existing 52 1462 L
2020 Background 45 1462 L
2020 Buildout 36 1462 L
NB LT
2019 Existing 75 190
2020 Background 90 190
2020 Buildout 102 190
W. Ruritan Road at
Proposed FSED Entrance
SB LT 2020 Buildout 45 1405 L
WB LR 2020 Buildout 30 110
NOTES: L – SimTraffic Link Distance
B+ – SimTraffic Bend queue added B –SimTraffic Link Distance to Bend
SB – SimTraffic Storage Bay Dist
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 24
Table 7.3 – Queue Lengths PM Peak Hour
Intersection Movement Scenario Queue Length
(ft)
Available Storage
Length (ft)
Route 460 at
Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way
EB T
2019 Existing 467 2282L
2020 Background 536 2282L
2020 Buildout 508 2282 L
WB T
2019 Existing 616 B+ 551 B
2020 Background 612 B+ 551 B
2020 Buildout 625 B+ 551 B
Route 460 at
W. Ruritan Road
EB L
2019 Existing 251 415 SB
2020 Background 241 415 SB
2020 Buildout 238 415 SB
WB R
2019 Existing 232 232 SB
2020 Background 232 232 SB
2020 Buildout 232 232 SB
SB LT
2019 Existing 172 174 L
2020 Background 163 174 L
2020 Buildout 174 174 L
SB R
2019 Existing 162 165 SB
2020 Background 133 165 SB
2020 Buildout 158 165 SB
Route 460 at
Valley Gateway Boulevard
EB T
2019 Existing 320 749 L
2020 Background 322 749 L
2020 Buildout 338 749 L
WB T
2019 Existing 235 5095 L
2020 Background 226 5095 L
2020 Buildout 231 5095 L
W. Ruritan Road at
Chick-fil-A Entrance
SB TR
2019 Existing 17 1462 L
2020 Background 7 1462 L
2020 Buildout 31 1462 L
NB LT
2019 Existing 108 190
2020 Background 104 190
2020 Buildout 83 190
W. Ruritan Road at
Proposed FSED Entrance
SB LT 2020 Buildout 22 1405 L
WB LR 2020 Buildout 37 110
NOTES: L – SimTraffic Link Distance
B+ – includes SimTraffic Bend queue B –SimTraffic Link Distance to Bend
SB – SimTraffic Storage Bay Dist
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 25
7.1 Scenario Analysis
The following subsection discuss the scenarios and queue lengths reported in Table 7.2 and Table 7.3.
7.1.1 Background and Buildout Intersection Analysis
A SimTraffic model was developed to simulate year 2020 geometric configurations. For the purpose of
this analysis the VDOT SimTraffic model was utilized as the starting point.
7.1.1.1 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Mexico Way/Blue Hills Drive
There is insufficient available storage for the westbound thru movement at the Route 460 intersection
with Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way in both the AM and PM peak hours for both the 2020 Background and
2020 Buildout scenarios. Site generated traffic increases westbound thru traffic by 0.1% during the AM
peak hour and 0.8% during the PM peak hour and does not adversely affect traffic at this intersection.
7.1.1.2 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road
There is insufficient available storage for the southbound left-thru movement at the Route 460
intersection with W. Ruritan Road in the AM peak hour for both the 2020 Background and 2020 Buildout
scenarios. According to VDOT, the signal at the intersection of Route 460 and W Ruritan Road is
currently operating freely and the queues on W Ruritan Road approach will not be an issue. But as VDOT
is working to implement the coordination throughout the network on Route 460, the queues on W Ruritan
Road will back up through the Chick-fil-A entrance. With the additional volumes from the development,
the queues will remain virtually unchanged during the peak hours based on the coordinated network
throughout Route 460 and are not adversely affected by the development.
7.1.1.3 Signalized Intersection of Route 460 at Valley Gateway Boulevard
The available storage length provides ample storage for both scenarios and both peak hours for the Route
460 intersection with Valley Gateway Boulevard. The reported queue lengths do not exceed the available
storage.
7.1.1.4 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at Chick‐fil‐A Entrance
The available storage length provides ample storage for both scenarios and both peak hours for the W.
Ruritan Road intersection with the Chick-fil-A Entrance. The reported queue lengths do not exceed the
available storage.
7.1.1.5 Unsignalized Intersection of W. Ruritan Road at FSED Entrance
The available storage length provides ample storage for the 2020 Buildout scenario during both peak
hours for the W. Ruritan Road intersection with the proposed FSED Entrance. The reported queue lengths
do not exceed the available storage.
Due to the proximity of the existing Chick-fil-A entrance to the proposed FSED Entrance, on the opposite
side of W. Ruritan Road, and the large number of northbound left turns into the Chick-fil-A entrance
during certain times of day, such as the mid-day lunch hour, it is recommended that construction of a right
turn lane and taper be strongly considered to allow northbound right turn ingress trips into the FSED
facility. The addition of a right turn lane at this location would allow ambulances to have access to the
FSED facility from Route 460 when vehicles waiting to turn left into Chick-fil-A might obstruct ingress.
The geometrics of a potential right turn lane are discussed is Section 8.3.2.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 26
8.0 Geometric Analysis
This section analyzes the existing geometric conditions and warranted improvements necessary for the
2020 Buildout condition. Section 8.3 analyses the warrant for a turn lane at the proposed intersection of
W. Ruritan Road and the proposed FSED site entrance.
8.1 Sight Distance
The size of the development site limits the distance from Route 460 an entrance can be constructed. Sight
distance requirements at intersections assume that the vehicle traveling on the road does not slow down
when the driver sees a vehicle pulling out of an entrance. The car in the entrance or side street must judge
the full speed of the vehicle, therefore, the long sight distance requirements.
The location of the Chick-fil-A entrance provides less than desirable sight distance to the north for cars
entering and exiting the site. The location of this entrance was constrained by the property limits and
buffer requirements at the Chick-fil-A site. The location of the proposed FSED entrance is also
constrained by the property limits and buffer requirements at the Chick-fil-A site. The property for the
FSED site extends further north along W. Ruritan Road allowing the proposed entrance to be positioned
further north than the existing Chick-fil-A entrance. At the VDOT Pre-Scoping Meeting it was
established that an offset entrance location would be beneficial if adequate sight distance can be provided
for left-turning vehicles exiting the FSED facility onto southbound W. Ruritan Road. Left turns out of the
Chick-fil-A entrance are restricted, addressing the issue of left turn conflicts at the offset entrance
locations. Mattern & Craig performed a profile survey of W. Ruritan Road from the stop bar at the Route
460 intersection to a location approximately 675’ along W. Ruritan Road in order to obtain a Design
Waiver for the Chick-fil-A entrance. This same survey profile for the Chick-fil-A entrance was used to
evaluate the sight distance for the proposed FSED entrance.
An evaluation of the existing conditions was performed to determine if adequate Intersection Sight
Distance (ISD) is available. Per AASHTO, the ISD requirement for 35 mph is 390’. Figure 8.1 provides
a plan and profile of the existing and required intersection sight distance right for a vehicle exiting the
proposed site and turning left onto W. Ruritan Road. The required sight distance right is 390’and the
available sight distance right is greater than 390’. Figure 8.2 provides a plan and profile of the existing
and required intersection sight distance for a vehicle entering the site via a left turn from W. Ruritan
Road. The required intersection sight distance is 390’ and the existing sight distance is greater than 390’.
The required intersection sight distances are based on 35 mph.
An evaluation of the existing conditions was performed to determine if adequate Stopping Sight Distance
(SSD) is available. Per AASHTO, the SSD requirement for 35 mph is 250’. Figure 8.3 indicates 250’ of
existing sight distance is available and a car can stop or slow down in time to avoid a vehicle exiting the
site.
Available Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) and Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) at the proposed
entrance location exceed requirements for 35mph, the posted speed on W. Ruritan Road.
A speed study performed during the preparation of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Chick-fil-A site
provided no justification for lowering the speed limit.
27
28
29
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 30
8.2 Corner Clearance
The existing southbound approach to the signalized intersection of W. Ruritan Road and Route 460 is a
two lane road with an additional southbound right turn lane between the existing Chick-fil-A entrance and
Route 460. The southern edge of pavement of the proposed development entrance is located
approximately 242’ from the north edge of pavement of Route 460. The VDOT Road Design Manual,
Appendix F, Figure 4-5 (page F-100), requires 225’ of corner clearance to the nearest entrance or street. .
(For reference, see Appendix E of this report for excerpts of Figure 4-5 from the VDOT Road Design
Manual.)
8.3 Turn Lane Warrants
On two-lane roads, vehicles slowing or stopping to turn create a hazard for other vehicles. This hazard
increases as the number of turning vehicles increases. The VDOT Road Design Manual provides
guidelines for turn lanes on two-lane roads. These guidelines are based on the design speed, turning
volume, approach volume, and opposing volume.
8.3.1 Left Turn Lane Warrants
In Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual, Figure 3-5 (page F-62), was used to determine if a
southbound left turn lane is warranted on W. Ruritan Road at the site’s proposed entrance. (For reference,
see Appendix E of this report for excerpts of Figure 3-5 from the VDOT Road Design Manual.) With an
advancing volume of 202 and an opposing volume of 150 in the AM peak hour a storage lane is not
warranted. With an advancing volume of 97 and an opposing volume of 268 in the PM peak hour a
storage lane is not warranted. It is worth noting that the left turn volume percentage is 0% in both the AM
and PM peak hours.
8.3.2 Right Turn Lane Warrants
In Appendix F of the VDOT Road Design Manual, Figure 3-26 (page F-80), was used to determine if a
right turn lane is warranted on W. Ruritan Road at the site’s proposed entrance. With a northbound
approach volume of 150 and a turning volume of 21 in the AM peak hour a right turn storage lane is not
warranted. With a northbound approach volume of 268 and a turning volume of 10 in the PM peak hour a
right turn storage lane is not warranted. (For reference, see Appendix F of this report for excerpts of
Figure 3-26 from the VDOT Road Design Manual.)
As discussed in Section 7.1.1, construction of a right turn lane allowing northbound right turn ingress
trips into the FSED facility should be considered to allow ambulances to have access to the FSED facility
from Route 460 during mid-day peak hours for Chick-fil-A when vehicles on W. Ruritan Road waiting to
turn left into Chick-fil-A might obstruct ingress. A potential right turn taper should begin at the end of the
Route 460 corner radius and the right turn lane should not extend beyond the proposed entrance location.
A preliminary assessment determined that a ±130’ right turn lane with a ±50’ taper can be accommodated
within the existing space.
M&C COMM. No. 3982
Lewis-Gale FSED Development T.I.A - For: Crunk Engineering 31
9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
9.1 Conclusions
This study analyzes Existing and Background traffic operations at the intersections of of Route 460 at
Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way, Route 460 at Valley Gateway Boulevard, Route 460 at W. Ruritan Road,
W. Ruritan Road at the existing Chick-fil-A entrance, and W. Ruritan Road at the proposed site entrance,
as well as impacts to traffic operation that might be expected upon completion of the proposed
development. This study evaluates impacts to vehicle level of service and delays, queue lengths, and the
feasibility of geometric improvements that may be warranted by the development.
Although some intersections in the study area experience unacceptable LOS and delays, the addition of
the site generated traffic has little effect on the LOS and delays at these intersections. The less than
optimal LOS experienced by some of the minor approaches may be mitigated by a detailed signal timing
study (post construction) to further optimize the operations of the signals.
This study also analyzes the queue lengths for critical turning movements at all of the intersections in the
study area. Although some approaches experience queue lengths that do not exceed the available storage
length, the addition of the site generated traffic has little effect on these queue lengths.
9.2 Recommendations
The following recommendations are offered to accompany implementation of the proposed development:
1. At the intersection of W. Ruritan Road and the proposed site entrance, consider providing a single
northbound right turn lane and taper beginning at the end of the Route 460 corner radius. The
potential right turn lane should not extend beyond the proposed entrance location. A preliminary
assessment determined that ±130’ right turn lane with a ±50’ right turn taper can be
accommodated within the existing space.
APPENDIX A
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 4010
18
9
4
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
G
E
O
R
G
E
P
A
T
T
O
N
D
R
.
SU
I
T
E
6
0
0
FR
A
N
K
L
I
N
,
T
N
3
7
0
6
7
(
6
1
5
)
8
7
3
-
1
7
9
5
WW
W
.
C
R
U
N
K
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
CR
U
N
K
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
L
L
C
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
P
a
t
h
:
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
1
9
\
1
9
0
1
3
-
R
o
a
n
o
k
e
V
A
F
S
E
D
\
D
w
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
x
r
e
f
\
s
p
b
a
s
e
.
d
w
g
APPENDIX B
• 2017 Existing Traffic Counts
• 2019 Existing Traffic Counts
2017 Existing Traffic Counts
• Route 460 (Challenger Ave.) at Blue Hills Drive/Mexico Way
• Route 460 (Challenger Ave.) at W. Ruritan Road
• Route 460 (Challenger Ave.) at Valley Gateway Boulevard
These turning movement counts were collected by Peggy Malone & Associates and provided
by VDOT.
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Car
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 20 1 4 0 25 6 369 2 0 377 2 1 2 0 5 0 137 49 0 186 593
07:15 AM 15 0 4 0 19 8 400 4 0 412 2 0 1 0 3 2 170 36 0 208 642
07:30 AM 27 0 6 0 33 9 375 3 0 387 5 1 2 0 8 4 241 50 0 295 723
07:45 AM 17 0 4 0 21 15 344 1 0 360 2 1 3 0 6 4 197 67 0 268 655
Total 79 1 18 0 98 38 1488 10 0 1536 11 3 8 0 22 10 745 202 0 957 2613
08:00 AM 16 0 0 0 16 9 334 4 0 347 6 5 1 0 12 2 208 57 0 267 642
08:15 AM 16 0 6 0 22 12 271 5 0 288 6 1 1 0 8 1 206 47 0 254 572
08:30 AM 5 0 2 0 7 9 289 4 0 302 4 0 2 0 6 4 183 24 0 211 526
08:45 AM 8 0 4 0 12 9 239 10 0 258 4 0 1 0 5 1 190 36 0 227 502
Total 45 0 12 0 57 39 1133 23 0 1195 20 6 5 0 31 8 787 164 0 959 2242
09:00 AM 10 0 5 1 16 0 215 10 0 225 11 1 9 0 21 6 175 26 0 207 469
09:15 AM 9 0 2 0 11 5 247 6 0 258 7 0 8 0 15 4 180 20 0 204 488
09:30 AM 14 0 3 0 17 4 259 3 0 266 8 0 5 0 13 4 177 32 0 213 509
09:45 AM 17 0 2 0 19 9 234 8 0 251 6 0 3 0 9 5 227 23 0 255 534
Total 50 0 12 1 63 18 955 27 0 1000 32 1 25 0 58 19 759 101 0 879 2000
10:00 AM 12 0 4 0 16 5 257 6 0 268 10 1 6 0 17 4 183 19 0 206 507
10:15 AM 10 1 2 0 13 2 225 14 0 241 6 0 12 0 18 4 223 18 0 245 517
10:30 AM 17 1 5 0 23 8 215 9 0 232 6 0 8 0 14 4 199 17 0 220 489
10:45 AM 16 1 3 0 20 3 244 6 0 253 5 0 5 0 10 6 212 20 0 238 521
Total 55 3 14 0 72 18 941 35 0 994 27 1 31 0 59 18 817 74 0 909 2034
11:00 AM 39 1 10 0 50 2 252 10 0 264 8 1 5 0 14 2 209 14 0 225 553
11:15 AM 20 2 9 0 31 5 212 14 0 231 7 4 13 0 24 4 198 25 0 227 513
11:30 AM 52 7 15 0 74 2 275 14 0 291 12 0 10 0 22 4 237 20 0 261 648
11:45 AM 24 2 13 0 39 7 259 19 0 285 17 6 10 0 33 3 250 49 0 302 659
Total 135 12 47 0 194 16 998 57 0 1071 44 11 38 0 93 13 894 108 0 1015 2373
12:00 PM 46 5 23 1 75 6 271 12 0 289 15 2 12 0 29 2 257 19 0 278 671
12:15 PM 38 2 18 0 58 8 255 13 0 276 18 3 12 0 33 7 254 42 0 303 670
12:30 PM 29 3 11 0 43 9 271 21 0 301 27 1 12 0 40 9 251 32 0 292 676
12:45 PM 22 2 12 0 36 11 271 8 0 290 21 3 23 0 47 5 275 41 0 321 694
Total 135 12 64 1 212 34 1068 54 0 1156 81 9 59 0 149 23 1037 134 0 1194 2711
01:00 PM 29 1 17 0 47 4 268 8 0 280 15 1 8 0 24 1 242 23 0 266 617
01:15 PM 19 0 11 0 30 7 254 6 0 267 8 1 8 1 18 3 296 31 0 330 645
01:30 PM 45 0 13 0 58 6 244 11 0 261 16 1 7 0 24 2 260 25 0 287 630
01:45 PM 15 2 5 0 22 7 242 5 0 254 6 1 13 0 20 9 293 29 0 331 627
Total 108 3 46 0 157 24 1008 30 0 1062 45 4 36 1 86 15 1091 108 0 1214 2519
02:00 PM 29 5 11 0 45 5 281 9 0 295 11 3 13 0 27 9 246 24 0 279 646
02:15 PM 33 2 14 0 49 1 277 14 0 292 13 2 11 1 27 6 304 39 0 349 717
02:30 PM 62 1 19 0 82 5 300 9 0 314 10 1 6 0 17 3 305 17 0 325 738
02:45 PM 34 1 12 0 47 7 230 4 0 241 9 2 7 0 18 8 326 46 0 380 686
Total 158 9 56 0 223 18 1088 36 0 1142 43 8 37 1 89 26 1181 126 0 1333 2787
03:00 PM 99 3 18 0 120 5 240 7 0 252 9 1 4 0 14 5 313 31 0 349 735
03:15 PM 55 2 19 0 76 6 283 4 0 293 10 3 6 0 19 5 348 38 0 391 779
03:30 PM 202 7 35 0 244 1 291 5 0 297 9 0 9 0 18 4 343 27 0 374 933
03:45 PM 56 5 33 2 96 2 325 16 0 343 10 1 10 0 21 2 338 26 0 366 826
Total 412 17 105 2 536 14 1139 32 0 1185 38 5 29 0 72 16 1342 122 0 1480 3273
04:00 PM 47 2 24 0 73 2 276 9 0 287 17 1 8 0 26 0 334 15 0 349 735
04:15 PM 39 0 12 0 51 5 267 9 0 281 6 1 4 0 11 13 351 23 0 387 730
04:30 PM 51 2 22 1 76 2 282 12 0 296 13 0 16 0 29 6 361 17 0 384 785
04:45 PM 49 0 16 0 65 4 271 9 0 284 17 0 6 0 23 6 382 29 0 417 789
Total 186 4 74 1 265 13 1096 39 0 1148 53 2 34 0 89 25 1428 84 0 1537 3039
05:00 PM 104 8 24 0 136 3 251 11 0 265 9 3 16 0 28 7 408 9 0 424 853
05:15 PM 55 0 25 0 80 0 251 8 0 259 17 1 6 0 24 4 393 18 0 415 778
05:30 PM 38 2 23 0 63 2 241 13 0 256 11 0 10 0 21 5 366 32 0 403 743
05:45 PM 25 1 18 0 44 2 274 12 0 288 6 2 6 0 14 4 413 25 0 442 788
Total 222 11 90 0 323 7 1017 44 0 1068 43 6 38 0 87 20 1580 84 0 1684 3162
06:00 PM 29 2 12 0 43 2 322 8 0 332 11 0 13 0 24 7 343 19 0 369 768
06:15 PM 24 1 11 0 36 0 290 11 0 301 8 0 7 0 15 9 320 18 0 347 699
06:30 PM 35 0 12 0 47 2 214 9 0 225 8 1 10 0 19 7 325 26 0 358 649
06:45 PM 19 0 6 0 25 2 208 3 0 213 5 1 5 0 11 3 250 30 0 283 532
Total 107 3 41 0 151 6 1034 31 0 1071 32 2 35 0 69 26 1238 93 0 1357 2648
Grand Total 1692 75 579 5 2351 245 12965 418 0 13628 469 58 375 2 904 219 12899 1400 0 14518 31401
Apprch %72 3.2 24.6 0.2 1.8 95.1 3.1 0 51.9 6.4 41.5 0.2 1.5 88.8 9.6 0
Total %5.4 0.2 1.8 0 7.5 0.8 41.3 1.3 0 43.4 1.5 0.2 1.2 0 2.9 0.7 41.1 4.5 0 46.2
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 15 0 4 19 8 400 4 412 2 0 1 3 2 170 36 208 642
07:30 AM 27 0 6 33 9 375 3 387 5 1 2 8 4 241 50 295 723
07:45 AM 17 0 4 21 15 344 1 360 2 1 3 6 4 197 67 268 655
08:00 AM 16 0 0 16 9 334 4 347 6 5 1 12 2 208 57 267 642
Total Volume 75 0 14 89 41 1453 12 1506 15 7 7 29 12 816 210 1038 2662
% App. Total 84.3 0 15.7 2.7 96.5 0.8 51.7 24.1 24.1 1.2 78.6 20.2
PHF .694 .000 .583 .674 .683 .908 .750 .914 .625 .350 .583 .604 .750 .846 .784 .880 .920
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM
12:00 PM 46 5 23 74 6 271 12 289 15 2 12 29 2 257 19 278 670
12:15 PM 38 2 18 58 8 255 13 276 18 3 12 33 7 254 42 303 670
12:30 PM 29 3 11 43 9 271 21 301 27 1 12 40 9 251 32 292 676
12:45 PM 22 2 12 36 11 271 8 290 21 3 23 47 5 275 41 321 694
Total Volume 135 12 64 211 34 1068 54 1156 81 9 59 149 23 1037 134 1194 2710
% App. Total 64 5.7 30.3 2.9 92.4 4.7 54.4 6 39.6 1.9 86.9 11.2
PHF .734 .600 .696 .713 .773 .985 .643 .960 .750 .750 .641 .793 .639 .943 .798 .930 .976
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 99 3 18 120 5 240 7 252 9 1 4 14 5 313 31 349 735
03:15 PM 55 2 19 76 6 283 4 293 10 3 6 19 5 348 38 391 779
03:30 PM 202 7 35 244 1 291 5 297 9 0 9 18 4 343 27 374 933
03:45 PM 56 5 33 94 2 325 16 343 10 1 10 21 2 338 26 366 824
Total Volume 412 17 105 534 14 1139 32 1185 38 5 29 72 16 1342 122 1480 3271
% App. Total 77.2 3.2 19.7 1.2 96.1 2.7 52.8 6.9 40.3 1.1 90.7 8.2
PHF .510 .607 .750 .547 .583 .876 .500 .864 .950 .417 .725 .857 .800 .964 .803 .946 .876
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Truck
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 1 0 1 0 2 1 14 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 47
07:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 20 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 14 37
07:30 AM 4 0 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 0 31 50
07:45 AM 7 0 1 0 8 1 23 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 2 0 26 58
Total 14 0 2 0 16 3 72 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 1 92 8 0 101 192
08:00 AM 15 0 5 0 20 0 25 0 0 25 2 0 0 0 2 0 29 1 0 30 77
08:15 AM 10 0 5 0 15 2 19 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 2 0 33 69
08:30 AM 5 0 5 0 10 1 20 0 0 21 1 0 0 0 1 0 22 2 0 24 56
08:45 AM 4 0 2 0 6 1 29 0 0 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 36 1 0 37 74
Total 34 0 17 0 51 4 93 0 0 97 3 0 1 0 4 0 118 6 0 124 276
09:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 3 0 31 53
09:15 AM 2 0 1 0 3 1 14 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 7 0 33 51
09:30 AM 2 0 4 0 6 3 19 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 1 0 31 5 0 36 65
09:45 AM 2 0 1 0 3 1 28 1 0 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 2 0 19 53
Total 7 0 6 0 13 5 82 1 0 88 1 0 1 0 2 0 102 17 0 119 222
10:00 AM 4 0 5 0 9 0 34 0 0 34 0 0 1 0 1 0 27 1 0 28 72
10:15 AM 4 0 5 0 9 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 4 0 36 67
10:30 AM 2 0 2 0 4 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 3 0 23 44
10:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 3 24 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 4 0 37 65
Total 11 0 12 0 23 3 97 0 0 100 0 0 1 0 1 1 111 12 0 124 248
11:00 AM 1 0 3 0 4 1 25 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 5 0 37 67
11:15 AM 2 0 2 0 4 1 29 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 5 0 32 66
11:30 AM 9 0 1 0 10 0 26 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 6 0 34 70
11:45 AM 5 0 2 0 7 2 17 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 4 0 30 56
Total 17 0 8 0 25 4 97 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 1 112 20 0 133 259
12:00 PM 5 0 2 0 7 3 29 0 0 32 1 0 0 0 1 0 26 1 0 27 67
12:15 PM 3 0 0 0 3 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 1 0 25 4 0 29 53
12:30 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 0 32 51
12:45 PM 4 0 1 0 5 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 0 31 55
Total 13 0 4 0 17 3 85 0 0 88 1 0 1 0 2 0 112 7 0 119 226
01:00 PM 0 0 2 0 2 2 32 0 0 34 1 0 0 0 1 0 18 4 0 22 59
01:15 PM 9 0 2 0 11 1 26 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 3 0 25 63
01:30 PM 2 0 2 0 4 0 15 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 1 0 27 3 0 30 50
01:45 PM 4 0 0 0 4 2 21 0 0 23 0 0 1 0 1 0 27 4 0 31 59
Total 15 0 6 0 21 5 94 0 0 99 2 0 1 0 3 1 93 14 0 108 231
02:00 PM 4 0 1 0 5 3 21 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 1 0 37 66
02:15 PM 2 0 3 0 5 3 19 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 1 1 18 5 0 24 52
02:30 PM 5 0 0 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 2 0 27 53
02:45 PM 7 0 2 0 9 2 22 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 19 52
Total 18 0 6 0 24 8 83 0 0 91 1 0 0 0 1 1 97 9 0 107 223
03:00 PM 5 0 2 0 7 1 29 0 0 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 26 3 0 29 67
03:15 PM 3 0 1 0 4 6 27 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 4 0 28 65
03:30 PM 1 0 2 0 3 1 15 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 0 20 39
03:45 PM 5 0 1 0 6 1 30 0 0 31 0 0 1 0 1 1 26 8 0 35 73
Total 14 0 6 0 20 9 101 0 0 110 0 0 2 0 2 1 93 18 0 112 244
04:00 PM 3 1 3 0 7 0 16 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 1 1 14 3 0 18 42
04:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 1 26 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 0 21 50
04:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 4 0 20 38
04:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 3 16 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8 0 22 42
Total 6 1 5 0 12 4 74 0 0 78 1 0 0 0 1 1 61 19 0 81 172
05:00 PM 3 0 1 0 4 2 19 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3 0 18 43
05:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 4 20 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 11 37
05:30 PM 3 0 2 0 5 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 16 37
05:45 PM 3 0 1 0 4 2 17 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 17 40
Total 11 0 4 0 15 8 72 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 17 0 62 157
06:00 PM 6 0 1 0 7 2 8 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 16 33
06:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 1 14 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 17 33
06:30 PM 5 0 0 0 5 1 17 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7 0 19 42
06:45 PM 3 1 0 0 4 2 10 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6 0 16 32
Total 14 1 2 0 17 6 49 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 21 0 68 140
Grand Total 174 2 78 0 254 62 999 1 0 1062 9 0 7 0 16 7 1083 168 0 1258 2590
Apprch %68.5 0.8 30.7 0 5.8 94.1 0.1 0 56.2 0 43.8 0 0.6 86.1 13.4 0
Total %6.7 0.1 3 0 9.8 2.4 38.6 0 0 41 0.3 0 0.3 0 0.6 0.3 41.8 6.5 0 48.6
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 15 0 5 20 0 25 0 25 2 0 0 2 0 29 1 30 77
08:15 AM 10 0 5 15 2 19 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 31 2 33 69
08:30 AM 5 0 5 10 1 20 0 21 1 0 0 1 0 22 2 24 56
08:45 AM 4 0 2 6 1 29 0 30 0 0 1 1 0 36 1 37 74
Total Volume 34 0 17 51 4 93 0 97 3 0 1 4 0 118 6 124 276
% App. Total 66.7 0 33.3 4.1 95.9 0 75 0 25 0 95.2 4.8
PHF .567 .000 .850 .638 .500 .802 .000 .808 .375 .000 .250 .500 .000 .819 .750 .838 .896
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 10:45 AM
10:45 AM 1 0 0 1 3 24 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 33 4 37 65
11:00 AM 1 0 3 4 1 25 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 32 5 37 67
11:15 AM 2 0 2 4 1 29 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 27 5 32 66
11:30 AM 9 0 1 10 0 26 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 28 6 34 70
Total Volume 13 0 6 19 5 104 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 120 20 140 268
% App. Total 68.4 0 31.6 4.6 95.4 0 0 0 0 0 85.7 14.3
PHF .361 .000 .500 .475 .417 .897 .000 .908 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .909 .833 .946 .957
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 5 0 2 7 1 29 0 30 0 0 1 1 0 26 3 29 67
03:15 PM 3 0 1 4 6 27 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 24 4 28 65
03:30 PM 1 0 2 3 1 15 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 20 39
03:45 PM 5 0 1 6 1 30 0 31 0 0 1 1 1 26 8 35 73
Total Volume 14 0 6 20 9 101 0 110 0 0 2 2 1 93 18 112 244
% App. Total 70 0 30 8.2 91.8 0 0 0 100 0.9 83 16.1
PHF .700 .000 .750 .714 .375 .842 .000 .833 .000 .000 .500 .500 .250 .894 .563 .800 .836
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Combined
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 21 1 5 0 27 7 383 2 0 392 2 1 2 0 5 0 165 51 0 216 640
07:15 AM 17 0 4 0 21 9 420 4 0 433 2 0 1 0 3 2 182 38 0 222 679
07:30 AM 31 0 6 0 37 9 390 3 0 402 5 1 2 0 8 4 270 52 0 326 773
07:45 AM 24 0 5 0 29 16 367 1 0 384 2 1 3 0 6 5 220 69 0 294 713
Total 93 1 20 0 114 41 1560 10 0 1611 11 3 8 0 22 11 837 210 0 1058 2805
08:00 AM 31 0 5 0 36 9 359 4 0 372 8 5 1 0 14 2 237 58 0 297 719
08:15 AM 26 0 11 0 37 14 290 5 0 309 6 1 1 0 8 1 237 49 0 287 641
08:30 AM 10 0 7 0 17 10 309 4 0 323 5 0 2 0 7 4 205 26 0 235 582
08:45 AM 12 0 6 0 18 10 268 10 0 288 4 0 2 0 6 1 226 37 0 264 576
Total 79 0 29 0 108 43 1226 23 0 1292 23 6 6 0 35 8 905 170 0 1083 2518
09:00 AM 11 0 5 1 17 0 236 10 0 246 11 1 9 0 21 6 203 29 0 238 522
09:15 AM 11 0 3 0 14 6 261 6 0 273 7 0 8 0 15 4 206 27 0 237 539
09:30 AM 16 0 7 0 23 7 278 3 0 288 9 0 5 0 14 4 208 37 0 249 574
09:45 AM 19 0 3 0 22 10 262 9 0 281 6 0 4 0 10 5 244 25 0 274 587
Total 57 0 18 1 76 23 1037 28 0 1088 33 1 26 0 60 19 861 118 0 998 2222
10:00 AM 16 0 9 0 25 5 291 6 0 302 10 1 7 0 18 4 210 20 0 234 579
10:15 AM 14 1 7 0 22 2 247 14 0 263 6 0 12 0 18 5 254 22 0 281 584
10:30 AM 19 1 7 0 27 8 232 9 0 249 6 0 8 0 14 4 219 20 0 243 533
10:45 AM 17 1 3 0 21 6 268 6 0 280 5 0 5 0 10 6 245 24 0 275 586
Total 66 3 26 0 95 21 1038 35 0 1094 27 1 32 0 60 19 928 86 0 1033 2282
11:00 AM 40 1 13 0 54 3 277 10 0 290 8 1 5 0 14 2 241 19 0 262 620
11:15 AM 22 2 11 0 35 6 241 14 0 261 7 4 13 0 24 4 225 30 0 259 579
11:30 AM 61 7 16 0 84 2 301 14 0 317 12 0 10 0 22 4 265 26 0 295 718
11:45 AM 29 2 15 0 46 9 276 19 0 304 17 6 10 0 33 4 275 53 0 332 715
Total 152 12 55 0 219 20 1095 57 0 1172 44 11 38 0 93 14 1006 128 0 1148 2632
12:00 PM 51 5 25 1 82 9 300 12 0 321 16 2 12 0 30 2 283 20 0 305 738
12:15 PM 41 2 18 0 61 8 275 13 0 296 18 3 13 0 34 7 279 46 0 332 723
12:30 PM 30 3 12 0 45 9 288 21 0 318 27 1 12 0 40 9 282 33 0 324 727
12:45 PM 26 2 13 0 41 11 290 8 0 309 21 3 23 0 47 5 305 42 0 352 749
Total 148 12 68 1 229 37 1153 54 0 1244 82 9 60 0 151 23 1149 141 0 1313 2937
01:00 PM 29 1 19 0 49 6 300 8 0 314 16 1 8 0 25 1 260 27 0 288 676
01:15 PM 28 0 13 0 41 8 280 6 0 294 8 1 8 1 18 4 317 34 0 355 708
01:30 PM 47 0 15 0 62 6 259 11 0 276 17 1 7 0 25 2 287 28 0 317 680
01:45 PM 19 2 5 0 26 9 263 5 0 277 6 1 14 0 21 9 320 33 0 362 686
Total 123 3 52 0 178 29 1102 30 0 1161 47 4 37 1 89 16 1184 122 0 1322 2750
02:00 PM 33 5 12 0 50 8 302 9 0 319 11 3 13 0 27 9 282 25 0 316 712
02:15 PM 35 2 17 0 54 4 296 14 0 314 14 2 11 1 28 7 322 44 0 373 769
02:30 PM 67 1 19 0 87 5 321 9 0 335 10 1 6 0 17 3 330 19 0 352 791
02:45 PM 41 1 14 0 56 9 252 4 0 265 9 2 7 0 18 8 344 47 0 399 738
Total 176 9 62 0 247 26 1171 36 0 1233 44 8 37 1 90 27 1278 135 0 1440 3010
03:00 PM 104 3 20 0 127 6 269 7 0 282 9 1 5 0 15 5 339 34 0 378 802
03:15 PM 58 2 20 0 80 12 310 4 0 326 10 3 6 0 19 5 372 42 0 419 844
03:30 PM 203 7 37 0 247 2 306 5 0 313 9 0 9 0 18 4 360 30 0 394 972
03:45 PM 61 5 34 2 102 3 355 16 0 374 10 1 11 0 22 3 364 34 0 401 899
Total 426 17 111 2 556 23 1240 32 0 1295 38 5 31 0 74 17 1435 140 0 1592 3517
04:00 PM 50 3 27 0 80 2 292 9 0 303 18 1 8 0 27 1 348 18 0 367 777
04:15 PM 40 0 13 0 53 6 293 9 0 308 6 1 4 0 11 13 368 27 0 408 780
04:30 PM 53 2 22 1 78 2 298 12 0 312 13 0 16 0 29 6 377 21 0 404 823
04:45 PM 49 0 17 0 66 7 287 9 0 303 17 0 6 0 23 6 396 37 0 439 831
Total 192 5 79 1 277 17 1170 39 0 1226 54 2 34 0 90 26 1489 103 0 1618 3211
05:00 PM 107 8 25 0 140 5 270 11 0 286 9 3 16 0 28 7 423 12 0 442 896
05:15 PM 57 0 25 0 82 4 271 8 0 283 17 1 6 0 24 4 397 25 0 426 815
05:30 PM 41 2 25 0 68 2 257 13 0 272 11 0 10 0 21 5 377 37 0 419 780
05:45 PM 28 1 19 0 48 4 291 12 0 307 6 2 6 0 14 4 428 27 0 459 828
Total 233 11 94 0 338 15 1089 44 0 1148 43 6 38 0 87 20 1625 101 0 1746 3319
06:00 PM 35 2 13 0 50 4 330 8 0 342 11 0 13 0 24 7 354 24 0 385 801
06:15 PM 24 1 12 0 37 1 304 11 0 316 8 0 7 0 15 9 334 21 0 364 732
06:30 PM 40 0 12 0 52 3 231 9 0 243 8 1 10 0 19 7 337 33 0 377 691
06:45 PM 22 1 6 0 29 4 218 3 0 225 5 1 5 0 11 3 260 36 0 299 564
Total 121 4 43 0 168 12 1083 31 0 1126 32 2 35 0 69 26 1285 114 0 1425 2788
Grand Total 1866 77 657 5 2605 307 13964 419 0 14690 478 58 382 2 920 226 13982 1568 0 15776 33991
Apprch %71.6 3 25.2 0.2 2.1 95.1 2.9 0 52 6.3 41.5 0.2 1.4 88.6 9.9 0
Total %5.5 0.2 1.9 0 7.7 0.9 41.1 1.2 0 43.2 1.4 0.2 1.1 0 2.7 0.7 41.1 4.6 0 46.4
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 9-Mexico Way_Blue Hills Dr and Orange Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Blue Hills Dr
Southbound
Orange Ave
W estbound
Mexico Way
Northbound
Orange Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 17 0 4 21 9 420 4 433 2 0 1 3 2 182 38 222 679
07:30 AM 31 0 6 37 9 390 3 402 5 1 2 8 4 270 52 326 773
07:45 AM 24 0 5 29 16 367 1 384 2 1 3 6 5 220 69 294 713
08:00 AM 31 0 5 36 9 359 4 372 8 5 1 14 2 237 58 297 719
Total Volume 103 0 20 123 43 1536 12 1591 17 7 7 31 13 909 217 1139 2884
% App. Total 83.7 0 16.3 2.7 96.5 0.8 54.8 22.6 22.6 1.1 79.8 19.1
PHF .831 .000 .833 .831 .672 .914 .750 .919 .531 .350 .583 .554 .650 .842 .786 .873 .933
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM
12:00 PM 51 5 25 81 9 300 12 321 16 2 12 30 2 283 20 305 737
12:15 PM 41 2 18 61 8 275 13 296 18 3 13 34 7 279 46 332 723
12:30 PM 30 3 12 45 9 288 21 318 27 1 12 40 9 282 33 324 727
12:45 PM 26 2 13 41 11 290 8 309 21 3 23 47 5 305 42 352 749
Total Volume 148 12 68 228 37 1153 54 1244 82 9 60 151 23 1149 141 1313 2936
% App. Total 64.9 5.3 29.8 3 92.7 4.3 54.3 6 39.7 1.8 87.5 10.7
PHF .725 .600 .680 .704 .841 .961 .643 .969 .759 .750 .652 .803 .639 .942 .766 .933 .980
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 104 3 20 127 6 269 7 282 9 1 5 15 5 339 34 378 802
03:15 PM 58 2 20 80 12 310 4 326 10 3 6 19 5 372 42 419 844
03:30 PM 203 7 37 247 2 306 5 313 9 0 9 18 4 360 30 394 972
03:45 PM 61 5 34 100 3 355 16 374 10 1 11 22 3 364 34 401 897
Total Volume 426 17 111 554 23 1240 32 1295 38 5 31 74 17 1435 140 1592 3515
% App. Total 76.9 3.1 20 1.8 95.8 2.5 51.4 6.8 41.9 1.1 90.1 8.8
PHF .525 .607 .750 .561 .479 .873 .500 .866 .950 .417 .705 .841 .850 .964 .833 .950 .904
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Car
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 47 0 13 0 60 14 329 2 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 1 134 18 0 153 558
07:15 AM 36 0 20 0 56 28 376 0 0 404 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 18 0 192 652
07:30 AM 34 0 27 0 61 13 341 0 0 354 0 0 1 0 1 1 206 22 0 229 645
07:45 AM 47 0 20 0 67 27 308 1 0 336 0 1 0 0 1 2 188 29 0 219 623
Total 164 0 80 0 244 82 1354 3 0 1439 0 1 1 0 2 4 702 87 0 793 2478
08:00 AM 44 0 15 0 59 6 277 0 0 283 0 0 1 0 1 1 189 20 0 210 553
08:15 AM 32 0 13 0 45 15 268 0 0 283 1 0 1 0 2 2 190 27 0 219 549
08:30 AM 33 0 8 0 41 17 256 1 0 274 0 0 0 0 0 1 184 14 0 199 514
08:45 AM 29 0 13 0 42 6 214 2 0 222 0 0 1 1 2 1 158 21 0 180 446
Total 138 0 49 0 187 44 1015 3 0 1062 1 0 3 1 5 5 721 82 0 808 2062
09:00 AM 18 0 16 0 34 10 200 2 0 212 2 0 1 0 3 3 188 23 0 214 463
09:15 AM 22 0 15 0 37 11 254 3 0 268 1 1 1 0 3 1 161 19 0 181 489
09:30 AM 32 0 14 0 46 9 212 1 0 222 1 0 3 0 4 2 196 20 0 218 490
09:45 AM 11 0 10 0 21 16 250 2 0 268 1 1 1 0 3 7 204 10 0 221 513
Total 83 0 55 0 138 46 916 8 0 970 5 2 6 0 13 13 749 72 0 834 1955
10:00 AM 25 0 11 0 36 14 238 2 0 254 6 1 1 0 8 2 173 25 0 200 498
10:15 AM 19 0 13 0 32 13 217 3 0 233 3 0 1 0 4 3 206 19 0 228 497
10:30 AM 14 0 19 0 33 11 217 3 0 231 3 1 3 0 7 5 211 24 0 240 511
10:45 AM 18 1 11 0 30 17 228 7 0 252 4 0 3 0 7 5 173 13 0 191 480
Total 76 1 54 0 131 55 900 15 0 970 16 2 8 0 26 15 763 81 0 859 1986
11:00 AM 28 0 15 0 43 14 230 4 0 248 8 1 3 0 12 4 190 27 0 221 524
11:15 AM 18 1 19 0 38 15 228 1 0 244 6 1 1 0 8 6 198 30 0 234 524
11:30 AM 15 0 14 0 29 26 264 7 0 297 2 0 2 0 4 5 209 48 0 262 592
11:45 AM 24 1 23 0 48 31 269 0 0 300 5 0 3 0 8 5 263 37 0 305 661
Total 85 2 71 0 158 86 991 12 0 1089 21 2 9 0 32 20 860 142 0 1022 2301
12:00 PM 29 1 21 0 51 20 248 3 0 271 6 2 1 1 10 7 234 51 0 292 624
12:15 PM 26 0 27 0 53 26 249 3 0 278 7 1 3 0 11 4 239 52 0 295 637
12:30 PM 25 1 26 0 52 26 268 1 0 295 6 0 2 0 8 8 247 34 0 289 644
12:45 PM 28 0 30 0 58 22 266 0 0 288 3 1 1 1 6 7 252 33 0 292 644
Total 108 2 104 0 214 94 1031 7 0 1132 22 4 7 2 35 26 972 170 0 1168 2549
01:00 PM 31 0 24 0 55 27 233 2 0 262 5 0 3 0 8 5 232 51 0 288 613
01:15 PM 29 1 28 0 58 29 227 3 0 259 5 1 3 0 9 4 266 30 0 300 626
01:30 PM 30 0 21 1 52 21 227 1 0 249 5 1 1 0 7 4 248 49 0 301 609
01:45 PM 24 0 27 0 51 28 244 3 0 275 6 0 1 0 7 0 274 34 0 308 641
Total 114 1 100 1 216 105 931 9 0 1045 21 2 8 0 31 13 1020 164 0 1197 2489
02:00 PM 20 1 22 0 43 18 256 4 0 278 4 2 2 0 8 6 274 34 0 314 643
02:15 PM 17 1 14 1 33 27 260 1 0 288 1 0 2 0 3 1 297 35 0 333 657
02:30 PM 22 1 15 0 38 30 289 1 0 320 2 1 2 0 5 5 302 21 0 328 691
02:45 PM 23 0 24 0 47 18 214 3 0 235 6 2 5 0 13 10 308 28 0 346 641
Total 82 3 75 1 161 93 1019 9 0 1121 13 5 11 0 29 22 1181 118 0 1321 2632
03:00 PM 32 0 15 0 47 18 227 0 0 245 4 1 5 0 10 6 317 34 0 357 659
03:15 PM 20 0 15 0 35 13 243 3 0 259 3 0 1 0 4 8 349 41 0 398 696
03:30 PM 24 0 19 0 43 18 321 1 0 340 4 1 3 1 9 3 311 33 0 347 739
03:45 PM 17 0 21 0 38 28 281 0 0 309 9 1 5 1 16 10 333 44 0 387 750
Total 93 0 70 0 163 77 1072 4 0 1153 20 3 14 2 39 27 1310 152 0 1489 2844
04:00 PM 25 0 15 0 40 21 265 0 0 286 8 1 2 0 11 7 350 55 0 412 749
04:15 PM 23 1 28 0 52 14 247 4 0 265 4 0 1 0 5 3 326 31 0 360 682
04:30 PM 25 0 11 0 36 27 264 4 0 295 5 0 5 0 10 7 351 46 0 404 745
04:45 PM 11 0 26 0 37 20 272 1 0 293 5 2 4 0 11 7 369 51 0 427 768
Total 84 1 80 0 165 82 1048 9 0 1139 22 3 12 0 37 24 1396 183 0 1603 2944
05:00 PM 17 1 28 0 46 31 230 0 0 261 6 0 4 0 10 10 376 53 0 439 756
05:15 PM 26 0 27 0 53 33 230 4 0 267 7 1 3 0 11 6 362 56 0 424 755
05:30 PM 24 0 19 0 43 38 237 6 0 281 4 0 11 0 15 9 318 47 0 374 713
05:45 PM 22 1 23 0 46 24 232 4 0 260 5 2 10 0 17 14 390 53 0 457 780
Total 89 2 97 0 188 126 929 14 0 1069 22 3 28 0 53 39 1446 209 0 1694 3004
06:00 PM 43 2 25 0 70 26 269 2 0 297 9 0 5 0 14 5 327 71 0 403 784
06:15 PM 35 0 28 0 63 27 268 1 0 296 7 3 0 0 10 8 309 43 0 360 729
06:30 PM 36 0 31 0 67 20 185 2 0 207 2 0 1 0 3 0 275 42 0 317 594
06:45 PM 20 0 23 0 43 22 193 2 0 217 1 0 2 0 3 4 246 37 0 287 550
Total 134 2 107 0 243 95 915 7 0 1017 19 3 8 0 30 17 1157 193 0 1367 2657
Grand Total 1250 14 942 2 2208 985 12121 100 0 13206 182 30 115 5 332 225 12277 1653 0 14155 29901
Apprch %56.6 0.6 42.7 0.1 7.5 91.8 0.8 0 54.8 9 34.6 1.5 1.6 86.7 11.7 0
Total %4.2 0 3.2 0 7.4 3.3 40.5 0.3 0 44.2 0.6 0.1 0.4 0 1.1 0.8 41.1 5.5 0 47.3
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 47 0 13 60 14 329 2 345 0 0 0 0 1 134 18 153 558
07:15 AM 36 0 20 56 28 376 0 404 0 0 0 0 0 174 18 192 652
07:30 AM 34 0 27 61 13 341 0 354 0 0 1 1 1 206 22 229 645
07:45 AM 47 0 20 67 27 308 1 336 0 1 0 1 2 188 29 219 623
Total Volume 164 0 80 244 82 1354 3 1439 0 1 1 2 4 702 87 793 2478
% App. Total 67.2 0 32.8 5.7 94.1 0.2 0 50 50 0.5 88.5 11
PHF .872 .000 .741 .910 .732 .900 .375 .890 .000 .250 .250 .500 .500 .852 .750 .866 .950
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM
11:45 AM 24 1 23 48 31 269 0 300 5 0 3 8 5 263 37 305 661
12:00 PM 29 1 21 51 20 248 3 271 6 2 1 9 7 234 51 292 623
12:15 PM 26 0 27 53 26 249 3 278 7 1 3 11 4 239 52 295 637
12:30 PM 25 1 26 52 26 268 1 295 6 0 2 8 8 247 34 289 644
Total Volume 104 3 97 204 103 1034 7 1144 24 3 9 36 24 983 174 1181 2565
% App. Total 51 1.5 47.5 9 90.4 0.6 66.7 8.3 25 2 83.2 14.7
PHF .897 .750 .898 .962 .831 .961 .583 .953 .857 .375 .750 .818 .750 .934 .837 .968 .970
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 26 0 27 53 33 230 4 267 7 1 3 11 6 362 56 424 755
05:30 PM 24 0 19 43 38 237 6 281 4 0 11 15 9 318 47 374 713
05:45 PM 22 1 23 46 24 232 4 260 5 2 10 17 14 390 53 457 780
06:00 PM 43 2 25 70 26 269 2 297 9 0 5 14 5 327 71 403 784
Total Volume 115 3 94 212 121 968 16 1105 25 3 29 57 34 1397 227 1658 3032
% App. Total 54.2 1.4 44.3 11 87.6 1.4 43.9 5.3 50.9 2.1 84.3 13.7
PHF .669 .375 .870 .757 .796 .900 .667 .930 .694 .375 .659 .838 .607 .896 .799 .907 .967
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Truck
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 33
07:15 AM 1 0 1 0 2 3 19 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 40
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 32 47
07:45 AM 3 0 0 0 3 1 21 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 0 30 55
Total 4 0 2 0 6 6 67 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 1 0 96 175
08:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 26 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 57
08:15 AM 3 0 0 0 3 1 18 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 42 64
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 57
08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 1 1 26 0 0 27 57
Total 4 0 1 0 5 2 92 0 0 94 0 0 1 0 1 1 134 0 0 135 235
09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 33 52
09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 46
09:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 38 55
09:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 1 22 0 0 23 51
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 78 0 0 1 0 1 1 124 0 0 125 204
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 0 35 69
10:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 34 57
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 1 0 29 47
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 27 1 0 0 0 1 0 34 1 0 35 63
Total 0 0 1 0 1 2 99 0 0 101 1 0 0 0 1 2 127 4 0 133 236
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 1 0 1 0 31 0 0 31 52
11:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 31 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 57
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 0 27 52
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 0 34 58
Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 1 0 1 0 115 2 0 117 219
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 1 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 22 51
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 25 46
12:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 1 0 28 2 0 30 49
12:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 22 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 27 52
Total 2 0 0 0 2 2 88 0 0 90 2 0 0 0 2 1 101 2 0 104 198
01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 21 49
01:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 24 49
01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 28 41
01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 63
Total 1 0 0 0 1 1 90 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 1 0 110 202
02:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 0 31 54
02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 0 20 43
02:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 22 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 1 0 18 43
02:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 25 0 0 25 1 0 1 0 2 0 27 0 0 27 55
Total 2 0 1 0 3 2 92 0 0 94 1 0 1 0 2 1 91 4 0 96 195
03:00 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 1 0 1 0 16 0 0 16 52
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 53
03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 39
03:45 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 29 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 26 58
Total 3 0 1 0 4 2 115 0 0 117 0 0 1 0 1 0 80 0 0 80 202
04:00 PM 2 0 2 0 4 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 41
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 41
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 18 32
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 36
Total 2 0 2 0 4 0 82 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 0 64 150
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 14 32
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 29
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 16 35
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 35
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 1 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 1 0 52 131
06:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 25
06:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 34
06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 27
06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 25
Total 1 0 1 0 2 1 60 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 48 111
Grand Total 20 0 9 0 29 18 1041 1 0 1060 4 0 5 0 9 6 1138 16 0 1160 2258
Apprch %69 0 31 0 1.7 98.2 0.1 0 44.4 0 55.6 0 0.5 98.1 1.4 0
Total %0.9 0 0.4 0 1.3 0.8 46.1 0 0 46.9 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.4 0.3 50.4 0.7 0 51.4
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 0 1 1 1 26 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 57
08:15 AM 3 0 0 3 1 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 42 64
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 37 57
08:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 28 0 28 0 0 1 1 1 26 0 27 57
Total Volume 4 0 1 5 2 92 0 94 0 0 1 1 1 134 0 135 235
% App. Total 80 0 20 2.1 97.9 0 0 0 100 0.7 99.3 0
PHF .333 .000 .250 .417 .500 .821 .000 .839 .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .798 .000 .804 .918
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 10:00 AM
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 32 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 35 69
10:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 57
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 2 26 1 29 47
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 27 1 0 0 1 0 34 1 35 63
Total Volume 0 0 1 1 2 99 0 101 1 0 0 1 2 127 4 133 236
% App. Total 0 0 100 2 98 0 100 0 0 1.5 95.5 3
PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .250 .773 .000 .743 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .934 .500 .950 .855
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 02:30 PM
02:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2 22 0 24 0 0 0 0 1 16 1 18 43
02:45 PM 1 0 0 1 0 25 0 25 1 0 1 2 0 27 0 27 55
03:00 PM 1 0 1 2 0 33 0 33 0 0 1 1 0 16 0 16 52
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 53
Total Volume 3 0 1 4 2 113 0 115 1 0 2 3 1 79 1 81 203
% App. Total 75 0 25 1.7 98.3 0 33.3 0 66.7 1.2 97.5 1.2
PHF .750 .000 .250 .500 .250 .856 .000 .871 .250 .000 .500 .375 .250 .731 .250 .750 .923
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Combined
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 47 0 14 0 61 14 343 2 0 359 0 0 0 0 0 1 152 18 0 171 591
07:15 AM 37 0 21 0 58 31 395 0 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 18 0 208 692
07:30 AM 34 0 27 0 61 15 354 0 0 369 0 0 1 0 1 1 238 22 0 261 692
07:45 AM 50 0 20 0 70 28 329 1 0 358 0 1 0 0 1 2 217 30 0 249 678
Total 168 0 82 0 250 88 1421 3 0 1512 0 1 1 0 2 4 797 88 0 889 2653
08:00 AM 44 0 16 0 60 7 303 0 0 310 0 0 1 0 1 1 218 20 0 239 610
08:15 AM 35 0 13 0 48 16 286 0 0 302 1 0 1 0 2 2 232 27 0 261 613
08:30 AM 33 0 8 0 41 17 276 1 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 1 221 14 0 236 571
08:45 AM 30 0 13 0 43 6 242 2 0 250 0 0 2 1 3 2 184 21 0 207 503
Total 142 0 50 0 192 46 1107 3 0 1156 1 0 4 1 6 6 855 82 0 943 2297
09:00 AM 18 0 16 0 34 10 219 2 0 231 2 0 1 0 3 3 221 23 0 247 515
09:15 AM 22 0 15 0 37 11 269 3 0 283 1 1 1 0 3 1 192 19 0 212 535
09:30 AM 32 0 14 0 46 9 229 1 0 239 1 0 3 0 4 2 234 20 0 256 545
09:45 AM 11 0 10 0 21 16 277 2 0 295 1 1 2 0 4 8 226 10 0 244 564
Total 83 0 55 0 138 46 994 8 0 1048 5 2 7 0 14 14 873 72 0 959 2159
10:00 AM 25 0 11 0 36 16 270 2 0 288 6 1 1 0 8 2 206 27 0 235 567
10:15 AM 19 0 14 0 33 13 239 3 0 255 3 0 1 0 4 3 240 19 0 262 554
10:30 AM 14 0 19 0 33 11 235 3 0 249 3 1 3 0 7 7 237 25 0 269 558
10:45 AM 18 1 11 0 30 17 255 7 0 279 5 0 3 0 8 5 207 14 0 226 543
Total 76 1 55 0 132 57 999 15 0 1071 17 2 8 0 27 17 890 85 0 992 2222
11:00 AM 28 0 15 0 43 14 250 4 0 268 8 1 4 0 13 4 221 27 0 252 576
11:15 AM 19 1 19 0 39 15 259 1 0 275 6 1 1 0 8 6 223 30 0 259 581
11:30 AM 15 0 14 0 29 26 289 7 0 322 2 0 2 0 4 5 235 49 0 289 644
11:45 AM 24 1 23 0 48 31 293 0 0 324 5 0 3 0 8 5 296 38 0 339 719
Total 86 2 71 0 159 86 1091 12 0 1189 21 2 10 0 33 20 975 144 0 1139 2520
12:00 PM 29 1 21 0 51 20 276 3 0 299 7 2 1 1 11 7 256 51 0 314 675
12:15 PM 26 0 27 0 53 26 270 3 0 299 7 1 3 0 11 5 263 52 0 320 683
12:30 PM 26 1 26 0 53 26 285 1 0 312 7 0 2 0 9 8 275 36 0 319 693
12:45 PM 29 0 30 0 59 24 288 0 0 312 3 1 1 1 6 7 279 33 0 319 696
Total 110 2 104 0 216 96 1119 7 0 1222 24 4 7 2 37 27 1073 172 0 1272 2747
01:00 PM 31 0 24 0 55 27 261 2 0 290 5 0 3 0 8 5 253 51 0 309 662
01:15 PM 30 1 28 0 59 29 251 3 0 283 5 1 3 0 9 4 290 30 0 324 675
01:30 PM 30 0 21 1 52 21 240 1 0 262 5 1 1 0 7 4 275 50 0 329 650
01:45 PM 24 0 27 0 51 29 269 3 0 301 6 0 1 0 7 0 311 34 0 345 704
Total 115 1 100 1 217 106 1021 9 0 1136 21 2 8 0 31 13 1129 165 0 1307 2691
02:00 PM 20 1 23 0 44 18 278 4 0 300 4 2 2 0 8 6 304 35 0 345 697
02:15 PM 17 1 14 1 33 27 283 1 0 311 1 0 2 0 3 1 315 37 0 353 700
02:30 PM 23 1 15 0 39 32 311 1 0 344 2 1 2 0 5 6 318 22 0 346 734
02:45 PM 24 0 24 0 48 18 239 3 0 260 7 2 6 0 15 10 335 28 0 373 696
Total 84 3 76 1 164 95 1111 9 0 1215 14 5 12 0 31 23 1272 122 0 1417 2827
03:00 PM 33 0 16 0 49 18 260 0 0 278 4 1 6 0 11 6 333 34 0 373 711
03:15 PM 20 0 15 0 35 13 276 3 0 292 3 0 1 0 4 8 369 41 0 418 749
03:30 PM 24 0 19 0 43 19 341 1 0 361 4 1 3 1 9 3 329 33 0 365 778
03:45 PM 19 0 21 0 40 29 310 0 0 339 9 1 5 1 16 10 359 44 0 413 808
Total 96 0 71 0 167 79 1187 4 0 1270 20 3 15 2 40 27 1390 152 0 1569 3046
04:00 PM 27 0 17 0 44 21 282 0 0 303 8 1 2 0 11 7 370 55 0 432 790
04:15 PM 23 1 28 0 52 14 274 4 0 292 4 0 1 0 5 3 340 31 0 374 723
04:30 PM 25 0 11 0 36 27 278 4 0 309 5 0 5 0 10 7 368 47 0 422 777
04:45 PM 11 0 26 0 37 20 296 1 0 317 5 2 4 0 11 7 381 51 0 439 804
Total 86 1 82 0 169 82 1130 9 0 1221 22 3 12 0 37 24 1459 184 0 1667 3094
05:00 PM 17 1 28 0 46 31 247 1 0 279 6 0 4 0 10 10 389 54 0 453 788
05:15 PM 26 0 27 0 53 33 255 4 0 292 7 1 3 0 11 6 366 56 0 428 784
05:30 PM 24 0 19 0 43 38 256 6 0 300 4 0 11 0 15 9 334 47 0 390 748
05:45 PM 22 1 23 0 46 24 249 4 0 277 5 2 10 0 17 14 408 53 0 475 815
Total 89 2 97 0 188 126 1007 15 0 1148 22 3 28 0 53 39 1497 210 0 1746 3135
06:00 PM 43 2 26 0 71 26 283 2 0 311 9 0 5 0 14 5 337 71 0 413 809
06:15 PM 36 0 28 0 64 27 284 1 0 312 7 3 0 0 10 8 326 43 0 377 763
06:30 PM 36 0 31 0 67 20 203 2 0 225 2 0 1 0 3 0 284 42 0 326 621
06:45 PM 20 0 23 0 43 23 205 2 0 230 1 0 2 0 3 4 258 37 0 299 575
Total 135 2 108 0 245 96 975 7 0 1078 19 3 8 0 30 17 1205 193 0 1415 2768
Grand Total 1270 14 951 2 2237 1003 13162 101 0 14266 186 30 120 5 341 231 13415 1669 0 15315 32159
Apprch %56.8 0.6 42.5 0.1 7 92.3 0.7 0 54.5 8.8 35.2 1.5 1.5 87.6 10.9 0
Total %3.9 0 3 0 7 3.1 40.9 0.3 0 44.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0 1.1 0.7 41.7 5.2 0 47.6
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 10-Ruritan Rd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Ruritan Rd
Southbound
Challenger Ave
W estbound
CVS
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 37 0 21 58 31 395 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 190 18 208 692
07:30 AM 34 0 27 61 15 354 0 369 0 0 1 1 1 238 22 261 692
07:45 AM 50 0 20 70 28 329 1 358 0 1 0 1 2 217 30 249 678
08:00 AM 44 0 16 60 7 303 0 310 0 0 1 1 1 218 20 239 610
Total Volume 165 0 84 249 81 1381 1 1463 0 1 2 3 4 863 90 957 2672
% App. Total 66.3 0 33.7 5.5 94.4 0.1 0 33.3 66.7 0.4 90.2 9.4
PHF .825 .000 .778 .889 .653 .874 .250 .859 .000 .250 .500 .750 .500 .907 .750 .917 .965
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM
11:45 AM 24 1 23 48 31 293 0 324 5 0 3 8 5 296 38 339 719
12:00 PM 29 1 21 51 20 276 3 299 7 2 1 10 7 256 51 314 674
12:15 PM 26 0 27 53 26 270 3 299 7 1 3 11 5 263 52 320 683
12:30 PM 26 1 26 53 26 285 1 312 7 0 2 9 8 275 36 319 693
Total Volume 105 3 97 205 103 1124 7 1234 26 3 9 38 25 1090 177 1292 2769
% App. Total 51.2 1.5 47.3 8.3 91.1 0.6 68.4 7.9 23.7 1.9 84.4 13.7
PHF .905 .750 .898 .967 .831 .959 .583 .952 .929 .375 .750 .864 .781 .921 .851 .953 .963
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 26 0 27 53 33 255 4 292 7 1 3 11 6 366 56 428 784
05:30 PM 24 0 19 43 38 256 6 300 4 0 11 15 9 334 47 390 748
05:45 PM 22 1 23 46 24 249 4 277 5 2 10 17 14 408 53 475 815
06:00 PM 43 2 26 71 26 283 2 311 9 0 5 14 5 337 71 413 809
Total Volume 115 3 95 213 121 1043 16 1180 25 3 29 57 34 1445 227 1706 3156
% App. Total 54 1.4 44.6 10.3 88.4 1.4 43.9 5.3 50.9 2 84.7 13.3
PHF .669 .375 .880 .750 .796 .921 .667 .949 .694 .375 .659 .838 .607 .885 .799 .898 .968
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Car
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 349 18 0 367 4 13 0 17 22 118 0 0 140 524
07:15 AM 367 12 0 379 6 16 0 22 19 178 0 0 197 598
07:30 AM 359 18 0 377 1 14 0 15 25 208 0 0 233 625
07:45 AM 323 22 0 345 0 10 0 10 23 197 0 0 220 575
Total 1398 70 0 1468 11 53 0 64 89 701 0 0 790 2322
08:00 AM 272 16 0 288 2 15 0 17 22 181 0 0 203 508
08:15 AM 277 13 0 290 2 15 0 17 22 179 0 0 201 508
08:30 AM 253 10 0 263 1 11 0 12 20 177 0 0 197 472
08:45 AM 222 24 0 246 1 11 1 13 20 162 0 0 182 441
Total 1024 63 0 1087 6 52 1 59 84 699 0 0 783 1929
09:00 AM 192 17 0 209 3 16 0 19 21 182 0 0 203 431
09:15 AM 236 20 0 256 4 15 0 19 26 142 0 0 168 443
09:30 AM 204 15 0 219 2 21 0 23 38 184 0 0 222 464
09:45 AM 228 31 0 259 4 26 0 30 35 181 0 0 216 505
Total 860 83 0 943 13 78 0 91 120 689 0 0 809 1843
10:00 AM 246 25 0 271 3 25 0 28 26 159 0 0 185 484
10:15 AM 212 22 0 234 6 17 0 23 41 181 1 0 223 480
10:30 AM 222 24 0 246 6 23 0 29 38 190 1 0 229 504
10:45 AM 221 30 0 251 8 28 0 36 28 165 0 0 193 480
Total 901 101 0 1002 23 93 0 116 133 695 2 0 830 1948
11:00 AM 220 25 0 245 5 28 0 33 28 184 0 0 212 490
11:15 AM 203 31 0 234 4 24 0 28 24 198 0 0 222 484
11:30 AM 277 34 0 311 2 35 0 37 48 178 0 0 226 574
11:45 AM 260 39 0 299 7 36 0 43 45 242 2 0 289 631
Total 960 129 0 1089 18 123 0 141 145 802 2 0 949 2179
12:00 PM 245 44 0 289 6 41 0 47 43 223 0 0 266 602
12:15 PM 243 42 0 285 9 46 0 55 58 213 1 0 272 612
12:30 PM 234 34 0 268 13 44 0 57 36 248 0 0 284 609
12:45 PM 243 29 0 272 12 42 0 54 55 245 1 0 301 627
Total 965 149 0 1114 40 173 0 213 192 929 2 0 1123 2450
01:00 PM 248 22 0 270 4 35 0 39 34 215 0 0 249 558
01:15 PM 230 34 0 264 7 33 0 40 46 267 1 0 314 618
01:30 PM 200 27 0 227 7 40 0 47 40 243 0 0 283 557
01:45 PM 239 29 0 268 3 36 0 39 47 258 1 0 306 613
Total 917 112 0 1029 21 144 0 165 167 983 2 0 1152 2346
02:00 PM 254 35 0 289 5 29 0 34 50 234 0 0 284 607
02:15 PM 246 25 0 271 5 27 0 32 49 268 2 0 319 622
02:30 PM 287 42 0 329 5 36 0 41 43 252 0 0 295 665
02:45 PM 195 29 0 224 4 41 0 45 51 287 0 0 338 607
Total 982 131 0 1113 19 133 0 152 193 1041 2 0 1236 2501
03:00 PM 225 48 0 273 8 33 0 41 49 270 0 0 319 633
03:15 PM 227 35 0 262 5 36 1 42 58 315 0 0 373 677
03:30 PM 234 33 0 267 32 96 1 129 54 269 2 0 325 721
03:45 PM 233 40 0 273 30 92 0 122 72 284 0 0 356 751
Total 919 156 0 1075 75 257 2 334 233 1138 2 0 1373 2782
04:00 PM 250 30 0 280 14 46 0 60 85 288 0 0 373 713
04:15 PM 218 39 0 257 7 47 0 54 56 291 0 0 347 658
04:30 PM 262 33 0 295 8 41 0 49 57 311 1 0 369 713
04:45 PM 264 35 0 299 6 36 0 42 63 334 0 0 397 738
Total 994 137 0 1131 35 170 0 205 261 1224 1 0 1486 2822
05:00 PM 239 27 0 266 12 32 0 44 64 349 0 0 413 723
05:15 PM 228 45 0 273 14 39 0 53 67 338 0 0 405 731
05:30 PM 266 38 0 304 6 33 0 39 60 286 0 0 346 689
05:45 PM 220 53 0 273 9 49 0 58 46 347 0 0 393 724
Total 953 163 0 1116 41 153 0 194 237 1320 0 0 1557 2867
06:00 PM 266 31 0 297 10 35 0 45 65 303 1 0 369 711
06:15 PM 258 35 0 293 3 37 0 40 56 284 0 0 340 673
06:30 PM 172 34 0 206 5 38 0 43 49 264 0 0 313 562
06:45 PM 181 40 0 221 7 40 0 47 28 226 0 0 254 522
Total 877 140 0 1017 25 150 0 175 198 1077 1 0 1276 2468
Grand Total 11750 1434 0 13184 327 1579 3 1909 2052 11298 14 0 13364 28457
Apprch %89.1 10.9 0 17.1 82.7 0.2 15.4 84.5 0.1 0
Total %41.3 5 0 46.3 1.1 5.5 0 6.7 7.2 39.7 0 0 47
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 349 18 367 4 13 17 22 118 0 140 524
07:15 AM 367 12 379 6 16 22 19 178 0 197 598
07:30 AM 359 18 377 1 14 15 25 208 0 233 625
07:45 AM 323 22 345 0 10 10 23 197 0 220 575
Total Volume 1398 70 1468 11 53 64 89 701 0 790 2322
% App. Total 95.2 4.8 17.2 82.8 11.3 88.7 0
PHF .952 .795 .968 .458 .828 .727 .890 .843 .000 .848 .929
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM
11:45 AM 260 39 299 7 36 43 45 242 2 289 631
12:00 PM 245 44 289 6 41 47 43 223 0 266 602
12:15 PM 243 42 285 9 46 55 58 213 1 272 612
12:30 PM 234 34 268 13 44 57 36 248 0 284 609
Total Volume 982 159 1141 35 167 202 182 926 3 1111 2454
% App. Total 86.1 13.9 17.3 82.7 16.4 83.3 0.3
PHF .944 .903 .954 .673 .908 .886 .784 .933 .375 .961 .972
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 262 33 295 8 41 49 57 311 1 369 713
04:45 PM 264 35 299 6 36 42 63 334 0 397 738
05:00 PM 239 27 266 12 32 44 64 349 0 413 723
05:15 PM 228 45 273 14 39 53 67 338 0 405 731
Total Volume 993 140 1133 40 148 188 251 1332 1 1584 2905
% App. Total 87.6 12.4 21.3 78.7 15.8 84.1 0.1
PHF .940 .778 .947 .714 .902 .887 .937 .954 .250 .959 .984
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Truck
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 14 0 0 14 0 2 0 2 0 25 0 0 25 41
07:15 AM 13 0 0 13 1 7 0 8 1 13 0 0 14 35
07:30 AM 13 0 0 13 0 2 0 2 2 31 0 0 33 48
07:45 AM 19 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 25 45
Total 59 1 0 60 1 11 0 12 4 93 0 0 97 169
08:00 AM 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 55
08:15 AM 18 1 0 19 0 2 0 2 2 36 0 0 38 59
08:30 AM 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 2 30 0 0 32 53
08:45 AM 27 1 0 28 1 1 0 2 0 26 0 0 26 56
Total 90 2 0 92 1 3 0 4 4 123 0 0 127 223
09:00 AM 19 0 0 19 0 2 0 2 5 28 0 0 33 54
09:15 AM 16 0 0 16 0 1 0 1 0 28 0 0 28 45
09:30 AM 18 1 0 19 0 1 0 1 0 35 0 0 35 55
09:45 AM 25 0 0 25 1 1 0 2 1 22 0 0 23 50
Total 78 1 0 79 1 5 0 6 6 113 0 0 119 204
10:00 AM 35 1 0 36 0 1 0 1 4 30 0 0 34 71
10:15 AM 20 0 0 20 2 1 0 3 1 31 0 0 32 55
10:30 AM 14 2 0 16 0 3 0 3 0 19 0 0 19 38
10:45 AM 22 2 0 24 2 1 0 3 0 31 0 0 31 58
Total 91 5 0 96 4 6 0 10 5 111 0 0 116 222
11:00 AM 27 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 6 28 0 0 34 61
11:15 AM 29 0 0 29 0 3 0 3 1 25 0 0 26 58
11:30 AM 25 1 0 26 0 2 0 2 2 24 0 0 26 54
11:45 AM 20 2 0 22 2 1 0 3 0 35 0 0 35 60
Total 101 3 0 104 2 6 0 8 9 112 0 0 121 233
12:00 PM 29 0 0 29 0 1 0 1 2 22 0 0 24 54
12:15 PM 19 0 0 19 0 3 0 3 1 24 0 0 25 47
12:30 PM 14 0 0 14 1 1 0 2 0 31 0 0 31 47
12:45 PM 20 0 0 20 1 1 0 2 2 23 0 0 25 47
Total 82 0 0 82 2 6 0 8 5 100 0 0 105 195
01:00 PM 29 3 0 32 1 2 0 3 3 16 0 0 19 54
01:15 PM 19 0 0 19 0 5 0 5 2 21 0 0 23 47
01:30 PM 9 0 0 9 0 3 0 3 3 21 0 0 24 36
01:45 PM 23 1 0 24 0 2 0 2 0 32 0 0 32 58
Total 80 4 0 84 1 12 0 13 8 90 0 0 98 195
02:00 PM 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 34 47
02:15 PM 20 0 0 20 0 1 0 1 1 21 0 0 22 43
02:30 PM 19 4 0 23 0 1 0 1 1 17 0 0 18 42
02:45 PM 21 2 0 23 1 1 0 2 5 25 0 0 30 55
Total 73 6 0 79 1 3 0 4 8 96 0 0 104 187
03:00 PM 28 1 0 29 0 2 0 2 1 17 0 0 18 49
03:15 PM 26 1 0 27 0 3 0 3 2 24 0 0 26 56
03:30 PM 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 18 40
03:45 PM 22 1 0 23 1 1 0 2 1 27 0 0 28 53
Total 98 3 0 101 1 6 0 7 6 84 0 0 90 198
04:00 PM 17 1 0 18 0 2 0 2 2 17 0 0 19 39
04:15 PM 24 2 0 26 1 2 0 3 0 12 0 0 12 41
04:30 PM 18 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 18 37
04:45 PM 18 3 0 21 1 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 10 32
Total 77 7 0 84 2 4 0 6 4 55 0 0 59 149
05:00 PM 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 12 36
05:15 PM 23 0 0 23 1 1 0 2 1 3 0 0 4 29
05:30 PM 22 1 0 23 1 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 15 39
05:45 PM 15 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 11 0 0 15 31
Total 84 2 0 86 2 1 0 3 7 39 0 0 46 135
06:00 PM 13 0 0 13 1 2 0 3 3 7 0 0 10 26
06:15 PM 14 0 0 14 1 2 0 3 1 14 0 0 15 32
06:30 PM 17 1 0 18 0 2 0 2 2 6 0 0 8 28
06:45 PM 11 2 0 13 1 0 0 1 2 10 0 0 12 26
Total 55 3 0 58 3 6 0 9 8 37 0 0 45 112
Grand Total 968 37 0 1005 21 69 0 90 74 1053 0 0 1127 2222
Apprch %96.3 3.7 0 23.3 76.7 0 6.6 93.4 0 0
Total %43.6 1.7 0 45.2 0.9 3.1 0 4.1 3.3 47.4 0 0 50.7
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 31 0 31 55
08:15 AM 18 1 19 0 2 2 2 36 0 38 59
08:30 AM 21 0 21 0 0 0 2 30 0 32 53
08:45 AM 27 1 28 1 1 2 0 26 0 26 56
Total Volume 90 2 92 1 3 4 4 123 0 127 223
% App. Total 97.8 2.2 25 75 3.1 96.9 0
PHF .833 .500 .821 .250 .375 .500 .500 .854 .000 .836 .945
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:00 AM
11:00 AM 27 0 27 0 0 0 6 28 0 34 61
11:15 AM 29 0 29 0 3 3 1 25 0 26 58
11:30 AM 25 1 26 0 2 2 2 24 0 26 54
11:45 AM 20 2 22 2 1 3 0 35 0 35 60
Total Volume 101 3 104 2 6 8 9 112 0 121 233
% App. Total 97.1 2.9 25 75 7.4 92.6 0
PHF .871 .375 .897 .250 .500 .667 .375 .800 .000 .864 .955
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 02:30 PM
02:30 PM 19 4 23 0 1 1 1 17 0 18 42
02:45 PM 21 2 23 1 1 2 5 25 0 30 55
03:00 PM 28 1 29 0 2 2 1 17 0 18 49
03:15 PM 26 1 27 0 3 3 2 24 0 26 56
Total Volume 94 8 102 1 7 8 9 83 0 92 202
% App. Total 92.2 7.8 12.5 87.5 9.8 90.2 0
PHF .839 .500 .879 .250 .583 .667 .450 .830 .000 .767 .902
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Combined
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 363 18 0 381 4 15 0 19 22 143 0 0 165 565
07:15 AM 380 12 0 392 7 23 0 30 20 191 0 0 211 633
07:30 AM 372 18 0 390 1 16 0 17 27 239 0 0 266 673
07:45 AM 342 23 0 365 0 10 0 10 24 221 0 0 245 620
Total 1457 71 0 1528 12 64 0 76 93 794 0 0 887 2491
08:00 AM 296 16 0 312 2 15 0 17 22 212 0 0 234 563
08:15 AM 295 14 0 309 2 17 0 19 24 215 0 0 239 567
08:30 AM 274 10 0 284 1 11 0 12 22 207 0 0 229 525
08:45 AM 249 25 0 274 2 12 1 15 20 188 0 0 208 497
Total 1114 65 0 1179 7 55 1 63 88 822 0 0 910 2152
09:00 AM 211 17 0 228 3 18 0 21 26 210 0 0 236 485
09:15 AM 252 20 0 272 4 16 0 20 26 170 0 0 196 488
09:30 AM 222 16 0 238 2 22 0 24 38 219 0 0 257 519
09:45 AM 253 31 0 284 5 27 0 32 36 203 0 0 239 555
Total 938 84 0 1022 14 83 0 97 126 802 0 0 928 2047
10:00 AM 281 26 0 307 3 26 0 29 30 189 0 0 219 555
10:15 AM 232 22 0 254 8 18 0 26 42 212 1 0 255 535
10:30 AM 236 26 0 262 6 26 0 32 38 209 1 0 248 542
10:45 AM 243 32 0 275 10 29 0 39 28 196 0 0 224 538
Total 992 106 0 1098 27 99 0 126 138 806 2 0 946 2170
11:00 AM 247 25 0 272 5 28 0 33 34 212 0 0 246 551
11:15 AM 232 31 0 263 4 27 0 31 25 223 0 0 248 542
11:30 AM 302 35 0 337 2 37 0 39 50 202 0 0 252 628
11:45 AM 280 41 0 321 9 37 0 46 45 277 2 0 324 691
Total 1061 132 0 1193 20 129 0 149 154 914 2 0 1070 2412
12:00 PM 274 44 0 318 6 42 0 48 45 245 0 0 290 656
12:15 PM 262 42 0 304 9 49 0 58 59 237 1 0 297 659
12:30 PM 248 34 0 282 14 45 0 59 36 279 0 0 315 656
12:45 PM 263 29 0 292 13 43 0 56 57 268 1 0 326 674
Total 1047 149 0 1196 42 179 0 221 197 1029 2 0 1228 2645
01:00 PM 277 25 0 302 5 37 0 42 37 231 0 0 268 612
01:15 PM 249 34 0 283 7 38 0 45 48 288 1 0 337 665
01:30 PM 209 27 0 236 7 43 0 50 43 264 0 0 307 593
01:45 PM 262 30 0 292 3 38 0 41 47 290 1 0 338 671
Total 997 116 0 1113 22 156 0 178 175 1073 2 0 1250 2541
02:00 PM 267 35 0 302 5 29 0 34 51 267 0 0 318 654
02:15 PM 266 25 0 291 5 28 0 33 50 289 2 0 341 665
02:30 PM 306 46 0 352 5 37 0 42 44 269 0 0 313 707
02:45 PM 216 31 0 247 5 42 0 47 56 312 0 0 368 662
Total 1055 137 0 1192 20 136 0 156 201 1137 2 0 1340 2688
03:00 PM 253 49 0 302 8 35 0 43 50 287 0 0 337 682
03:15 PM 253 36 0 289 5 39 1 45 60 339 0 0 399 733
03:30 PM 256 33 0 289 32 96 1 129 56 285 2 0 343 761
03:45 PM 255 41 0 296 31 93 0 124 73 311 0 0 384 804
Total 1017 159 0 1176 76 263 2 341 239 1222 2 0 1463 2980
04:00 PM 267 31 0 298 14 48 0 62 87 305 0 0 392 752
04:15 PM 242 41 0 283 8 49 0 57 56 303 0 0 359 699
04:30 PM 280 34 0 314 8 41 0 49 59 327 1 0 387 750
04:45 PM 282 38 0 320 7 36 0 43 63 344 0 0 407 770
Total 1071 144 0 1215 37 174 0 211 265 1279 1 0 1545 2971
05:00 PM 263 27 0 290 12 32 0 44 66 359 0 0 425 759
05:15 PM 251 45 0 296 15 40 0 55 68 341 0 0 409 760
05:30 PM 288 39 0 327 7 33 0 40 60 301 0 0 361 728
05:45 PM 235 54 0 289 9 49 0 58 50 358 0 0 408 755
Total 1037 165 0 1202 43 154 0 197 244 1359 0 0 1603 3002
06:00 PM 279 31 0 310 11 37 0 48 68 310 1 0 379 737
06:15 PM 272 35 0 307 4 39 0 43 57 298 0 0 355 705
06:30 PM 189 35 0 224 5 40 0 45 51 270 0 0 321 590
06:45 PM 192 42 0 234 8 40 0 48 30 236 0 0 266 548
Total 932 143 0 1075 28 156 0 184 206 1114 1 0 1321 2580
Grand Total 12718 1471 0 14189 348 1648 3 1999 2126 12351 14 0 14491 30679
Apprch %89.6 10.4 0 17.4 82.4 0.2 14.7 85.2 0.1 0
Total %41.5 4.8 0 46.2 1.1 5.4 0 6.5 6.9 40.3 0 0 47.2
Peggy Malone & Associates
File Name : 11-Valley Gateway Blvd and Challenger Ave
Site Code :
Start Date : 4/12/2017
Page No : 2
Challenger Ave
W estbound
Valley Gateway Blvd
Northbound
Challenger Ave
Eastbound
Start Time Thru Left App. Total Right Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 363 18 381 4 15 19 22 143 0 165 565
07:15 AM 380 12 392 7 23 30 20 191 0 211 633
07:30 AM 372 18 390 1 16 17 27 239 0 266 673
07:45 AM 342 23 365 0 10 10 24 221 0 245 620
Total Volume 1457 71 1528 12 64 76 93 794 0 887 2491
% App. Total 95.4 4.6 15.8 84.2 10.5 89.5 0
PHF .959 .772 .974 .429 .696 .633 .861 .831 .000 .834 .925
Peak Hour Analysis From 10:00 AM to 01:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM
11:45 AM 280 41 321 9 37 46 45 277 2 324 691
12:00 PM 274 44 318 6 42 48 45 245 0 290 656
12:15 PM 262 42 304 9 49 58 59 237 1 297 659
12:30 PM 248 34 282 14 45 59 36 279 0 315 656
Total Volume 1064 161 1225 38 173 211 185 1038 3 1226 2662
% App. Total 86.9 13.1 18 82 15.1 84.7 0.2
PHF .950 .915 .954 .679 .883 .894 .784 .930 .375 .946 .963
Peak Hour Analysis From 02:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 253 36 289 5 39 44 60 339 0 399 732
03:30 PM 256 33 289 32 96 128 56 285 2 343 760
03:45 PM 255 41 296 31 93 124 73 311 0 384 804
04:00 PM 267 31 298 14 48 62 87 305 0 392 752
Total Volume 1031 141 1172 82 276 358 276 1240 2 1518 3048
% App. Total 88 12 22.9 77.1 18.2 81.7 0.1
PHF .965 .860 .983 .641 .719 .699 .793 .914 .250 .951 .948
Peggy Malone & Associates
2019 Existing Traffic Counts
• Route 460 (Challenger Ave.) at W. Ruritan Road
• W. Ruritan Road at Chick-fil-a Entrance
These turning movement counts were collected by The Traffic Group, a sub-consultant to
Mattern & Craig.
TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY
Counted by: VCU
Intersection of: US 460/220 Challenger Rd Date: May 9, 2019 Thursday
and: W. Ruritan Rd.Weather: Warm, Cloudy
Location: Roanoke County, Virginia Entered by: JBl Star Rating: 4
TOTAL
on: W. Ruritan Rd on: W. Ruritan Rd on: US 460/220 on: US 460/220 N + S
TIME +
RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E +
AM
6:30-6:45 24 0 10 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 10 292 0 0 302 0 205 14 7 226 562
6:45-7:00 32 0 25 0 57 1 0 0 0 1 15 348 0 0 363 2 223 13 3 241 662
7:00-7:15 34 0 22 0 56 0 0 1 0 1 20 396 0 0 416 1 185 13 3 202 675
7:15-7:30 42 0 29 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 22 409 0 0 431 0 216 9 6 231 733
7:30-7:45 57 0 31 0 88 0 0 2 0 2 24 361 0 0 385 3 254 17 5 279 754
7:45-8:00 29 0 18 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 21 370 0 0 391 0 239 11 14 264 702
8:00-8:15 38 1 18 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 15 331 0 0 346 0 196 12 5 213 616
8:15-8:30 25 0 16 0 41 1 0 2 0 3 15 305 0 0 320 1 247 19 5 272 636
8:30-8:45 33 1 22 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 18 259 1 0 278 2 222 12 2 238 573
8:45-9:00 26 0 12 0 38 0 0 2 0 2 16 271 1 2 290 4 232 13 9 258 588
9:00-9:15 15 0 19 0 34 2 0 3 0 5 10 249 1 0 260 4 217 12 5 238 537
9:15-9:30 16 2 23 0 41 4 0 1 0 5 18 244 5 0 267 1 210 21 6 238 551
9:30-9:45 20 1 14 0 35 5 0 4 0 9 16 257 1 0 274 7 215 18 2 242 560
9:45-10:00 21 2 11 0 34 3 0 3 0 6 15 245 6 1 267 7 206 19 6 238 545
10:00-10:15 14 1 15 0 30 5 1 5 0 11 13 278 2 0 293 1 264 22 6 293 627
10:15-10:30 19 1 15 0 35 2 1 0 0 3 13 228 0 0 241 0 220 21 6 247 526
10:30-10:45 22 1 11 0 34 5 0 0 0 5 19 244 4 1 268 6 223 19 3 251 558
10:45-11:00 32 0 18 0 50 7 1 2 0 10 17 254 3 0 274 3 243 17 4 267 601
11:00-11:15 30 1 18 0 49 5 2 3 0 10 25 230 3 0 258 5 219 24 7 255 572
11:15-11:30 22 0 20 0 42 6 1 5 0 12 25 252 4 0 281 8 265 25 5 303 638
11:30-11:45 14 0 20 0 34 6 1 2 0 9 28 269 0 0 297 8 251 39 5 303 643
11:45-12:00 27 0 24 0 51 9 0 1 0 10 31 257 2 0 290 8 269 38 5 320 671
12:00-12:15 31 0 24 0 55 9 1 3 0 13 36 267 2 0 305 5 283 38 8 334 707
12:15-12:30 31 0 23 0 54 5 1 4 0 10 42 291 3 0 336 6 260 30 10 306 706
12:30-12:45 25 1 24 0 50 4 1 3 0 8 37 249 1 0 287 4 268 39 7 318 663
12:45-1:00 24 0 23 0 47 4 1 2 0 7 33 268 1 0 302 5 285 24 7 321 677
1:00-1:15 26 1 28 0 55 4 0 3 0 7 36 255 5 0 296 5 264 28 3 300 658
1:15-1:30 21 2 35 0 58 3 0 4 0 7 29 230 1 0 260 3 261 31 4 299 624
1:30-1:45 29 1 19 0 49 4 3 2 0 9 23 241 3 2 269 4 265 23 3 295 622
1:45-2:00 29 0 25 0 54 5 1 2 0 8 19 220 1 0 240 9 314 31 5 359 661
2:00-2:15 17 0 26 0 43 3 1 0 0 4 18 289 2 0 309 4 307 19 5 335 691
2:15-2:30 16 0 24 0 40 5 0 4 0 9 23 263 0 0 286 7 312 14 1 334 669
2:30-2:45 22 0 17 0 39 6 0 3 0 9 28 295 2 0 325 5 362 28 6 401 774
2:45-3:00 21 2 19 0 42 4 0 3 0 7 26 270 0 0 296 5 322 35 2 364 709
3:00-3:15 20 1 14 0 35 7 1 3 0 11 27 338 3 0 368 6 324 26 6 362 776
3:15-3:30 18 1 26 0 45 6 1 2 0 9 17 289 7 0 313 5 333 32 6 376 743
3:30-3:45 20 0 26 0 46 7 3 3 0 13 32 288 0 0 320 12 328 28 4 372 751
3:45-4:00 32 0 17 0 49 9 1 1 0 11 25 290 4 1 320 9 371 41 5 426 806
4:00-4:15 28 0 19 0 47 8 1 5 0 14 24 273 3 0 300 7 353 16 11 387 748
4:15-4:30 16 0 19 0 35 8 2 5 0 15 28 314 0 1 343 11 371 47 4 433 826
4:30-4:45 27 1 22 0 50 5 1 2 1 9 23 309 1 0 333 12 336 30 3 381 773
4:45-5:00 15 0 28 0 43 6 2 12 0 20 29 261 3 1 294 14 387 34 5 440 797
5:00-5:15 21 0 20 0 41 13 0 7 0 20 36 315 4 0 355 11 436 38 5 490 906
5:15-5:30 21 0 25 0 46 8 0 5 0 13 33 349 2 0 384 13 335 40 8 396 839
5:30-5:45 24 1 31 0 56 6 2 10 1 19 34 271 2 0 307 11 379 39 6 435 817
5:45-6:00 46 3 34 0 83 10 0 7 0 17 28 269 3 0 300 7 380 54 6 447 847
6:00-6:15 20 0 30 0 50 3 3 4 0 10 30 267 2 0 299 6 333 39 5 383 742
6:15-6:30 26 0 29 0 55 7 2 2 0 11 32 243 1 0 276 6 254 29 7 296 638
12 Hr Totals 1218 25 1038 0 2281 221 35 137 2 395 1154 13563 89 9 14815 263 13444 1241 261 15209 32700
TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST
TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY
Counted by: VCU
Intersection of: US 460/220 Challenger Rd Date: May 9, 2019 Thursday
and: W. Ruritan Rd.Weather: Warm, Cloudy
Location: Roanoke County, Virginia Entered by: JBl Star Rating: 4
TOTAL
on: W. Ruritan Rd on: W. Ruritan Rd on: US 460/220 on: US 460/220 N + S
TIME +
RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E +
TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST
1 Hr Totals
6:30-7:30 132 0 86 0 218 1 0 1 0 2 67 1445 0 0 1512 3 829 49 19 900 2632
6:45-7:45 165 0 107 0 272 1 0 3 0 4 81 1514 0 0 1595 6 878 52 17 953 2824
7:00-8:00 162 0 100 0 262 0 0 3 0 3 87 1536 0 0 1623 4 894 50 28 976 2864
7:15-8:15 166 1 96 0 263 0 0 2 0 2 82 1471 0 0 1553 3 905 49 30 987 2805
7:30-8:30 149 1 83 0 233 1 0 4 0 5 75 1367 0 0 1442 4 936 59 29 1028 2708
7:45-8:45 125 2 74 0 201 2 0 2 0 4 69 1265 1 0 1335 3 904 54 26 987 2527
8:00-9:00 122 2 68 0 192 2 0 4 0 6 64 1166 2 2 1234 7 897 56 21 981 2413
8:15-9:15 99 1 69 0 169 4 0 7 0 11 59 1084 3 2 1148 11 918 56 21 1006 2334
8:30-9:30 90 3 76 0 169 7 0 6 0 13 62 1023 8 2 1095 11 881 58 22 972 2249
8:45-9:45 77 3 68 0 148 11 0 10 0 21 60 1021 8 2 1091 16 874 64 22 976 2236
9:00-10:00 72 5 67 0 144 14 0 11 0 25 59 995 13 1 1068 19 848 70 19 956 2193
9:15-10:15 71 6 63 0 140 17 1 13 0 31 62 1024 14 1 1101 16 895 80 20 1011 2283
9:30-10:30 74 5 55 0 134 15 2 12 0 29 57 1008 9 1 1075 15 905 80 20 1020 2258
9:45-10:45 76 5 52 0 133 15 2 8 0 25 60 995 12 2 1069 14 913 81 21 1029 2256
10:00-11:00 87 3 59 0 149 19 3 7 0 29 62 1004 9 1 1076 10 950 79 19 1058 2312
10:15-11:15 103 3 62 0 168 19 4 5 0 28 74 956 10 1 1041 14 905 81 20 1020 2257
10:30-11:30 106 2 67 0 175 23 4 10 0 37 86 980 14 1 1081 22 950 85 19 1076 2369
10:45-11:45 98 1 76 0 175 24 5 12 0 41 95 1005 10 0 1110 24 978 105 21 1128 2454
11:00-12:00 93 1 82 0 176 26 4 11 0 41 109 1008 9 0 1126 29 1004 126 22 1181 2524
11:15-12:15 94 0 88 0 182 30 3 11 0 44 120 1045 8 0 1173 29 1068 140 23 1260 2659
11:30-12:30 103 0 91 0 194 29 3 10 0 42 137 1084 7 0 1228 27 1063 145 28 1263 2727
11:45-12:45 114 1 95 0 210 27 3 11 0 41 146 1064 8 0 1218 23 1080 145 30 1278 2747
12:00-1:00 111 1 94 0 206 22 4 12 0 38 148 1075 7 0 1230 20 1096 131 32 1279 2753
12:15-1:15 106 2 98 0 206 17 3 12 0 32 148 1063 10 0 1221 20 1077 121 27 1245 2704
12:30-1:30 96 4 110 0 210 15 2 12 0 29 135 1002 8 0 1145 17 1078 122 21 1238 2622
12:45-1:45 100 4 105 0 209 15 4 11 0 30 121 994 10 2 1127 17 1075 106 17 1215 2581
1:00-2:00 105 4 107 0 216 16 4 11 0 31 107 946 10 2 1065 21 1104 113 15 1253 2565
1:15-2:15 96 3 105 0 204 15 5 8 0 28 89 980 7 2 1078 20 1147 104 17 1288 2598
1:30-2:30 91 1 94 0 186 17 5 8 0 30 83 1013 6 2 1104 24 1198 87 14 1323 2643
1:45-2:45 84 0 92 0 176 19 2 9 0 30 88 1067 5 0 1160 25 1295 92 17 1429 2795
2:00-3:00 76 2 86 0 164 18 1 10 0 29 95 1117 4 0 1216 21 1303 96 14 1434 2843
2:15-3:15 79 3 74 0 156 22 1 13 0 36 104 1166 5 0 1275 23 1320 103 15 1461 2928
2:30-3:30 81 4 76 0 161 23 2 11 0 36 98 1192 12 0 1302 21 1341 121 20 1503 3002
2:45-3:45 79 4 85 0 168 24 5 11 0 40 102 1185 10 0 1297 28 1307 121 18 1474 2979
3:00-4:00 90 2 83 0 175 29 6 9 0 44 101 1205 14 1 1321 32 1356 127 21 1536 3076
3:15-4:15 98 1 88 0 187 30 6 11 0 47 98 1140 14 1 1253 33 1385 117 26 1561 3048
3:30-4:30 96 0 81 0 177 32 7 14 0 53 109 1165 7 2 1283 39 1423 132 24 1618 3131
3:45-4:45 103 1 77 0 181 30 5 13 1 49 100 1186 8 2 1296 39 1431 134 23 1627 3153
4:00-5:00 86 1 88 0 175 27 6 24 1 58 104 1157 7 2 1270 44 1447 127 23 1641 3144
4:15-5:15 79 1 89 0 169 32 5 26 1 64 116 1199 8 2 1325 48 1530 149 17 1744 3302
4:30-5:30 84 1 95 0 180 32 3 26 1 62 121 1234 10 1 1366 50 1494 142 21 1707 3315
4:45-5:45 81 1 104 0 186 33 4 34 1 72 132 1196 11 1 1340 49 1537 151 24 1761 3359
5:00-6:00 112 4 110 0 226 37 2 29 1 69 131 1204 11 0 1346 42 1530 171 25 1768 3409
5:15-6:15 111 4 120 0 235 27 5 26 1 59 125 1156 9 0 1290 37 1427 172 25 1661 3245
5:30-6:30 116 4 124 0 244 26 7 23 1 57 124 1050 8 0 1182 30 1346 161 24 1561 3044
PEAK HOUR
7:00-8:00 162 0 100 0 262 0 0 3 0 3 87 1536 0 0 1623 4 894 50 28 976 2864
5:00-6:00 112 4 110 0 226 37 2 29 1 69 131 1204 11 0 1346 42 1530 171 25 1768 3409
TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY
Counted by: VCU
Intersection of: W. Ruritan Rd.Date: May 9, 2019 Thursday
and: Side Entrance to Chick-fil-A Weather: Warm, Cloudy
Location: Roanoke County, Virginia Entered by: JBl Star Rating: 4
TOTAL
on: W. Ruritan Rd on: W. Ruritan Rd on: Drivewa on: Chick-fil-A Side Entrance N + S
TIME +
RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E +
AM
6:30-6:45 1 26 0 0 27 0 2 23 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 66
6:45-7:00 4 32 0 0 36 0 6 21 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 23 86
7:00-7:15 0 35 0 0 35 0 8 27 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 88
7:15-7:30 6 56 0 0 62 0 4 26 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 112
7:30-7:45 1 62 0 0 63 0 11 29 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 24 127
7:45-8:00 2 35 0 0 37 0 11 21 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 14 83
8:00-8:15 1 38 0 0 39 0 7 20 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 83
8:15-8:30 1 25 0 0 26 0 12 23 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 1 0 19 80
8:30-8:45 1 37 0 0 38 0 8 22 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 15 83
8:45-9:00 2 23 0 0 25 0 8 21 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 70
9:00-9:15 0 28 0 0 28 0 5 19 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 11 63
9:15-9:30 3 15 0 0 18 0 18 24 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 21 81
9:30-9:45 0 20 0 0 20 0 11 23 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 71
9:45-10:00 2 18 0 0 20 0 13 20 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 17 70
10:00-10:15 1 20 0 0 21 0 14 22 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 66
10:15-10:30 2 21 0 0 23 0 16 19 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 1 0 16 74
10:30-10:45 0 23 0 0 23 0 16 23 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 75
10:45-11:00 3 21 0 0 24 0 22 14 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 88
11:00-11:15 5 27 0 0 32 0 18 31 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 24 105
11:15-11:30 1 17 1 0 19 0 16 36 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 1 0 26 97
11:30-11:45 0 9 0 0 9 0 26 48 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 22 105
11:45-12:00 0 26 0 0 26 0 16 48 0 64 0 0 1 0 1 30 0 0 0 30 121
12:00-12:15 3 22 0 0 25 0 22 51 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 36 134
12:15-12:30 1 12 0 0 13 0 19 55 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 42 129
12:30-12:45 1 13 0 0 14 0 26 51 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 36 127
12:45-1:00 2 12 0 0 14 0 16 46 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 33 109
1:00-1:15 2 19 0 0 21 0 20 45 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 1 0 42 128
1:15-1:30 1 26 0 0 27 0 24 33 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 1 0 32 116
1:30-1:45 1 23 0 0 24 0 25 26 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 103
1:45-2:00 1 21 0 0 22 0 18 31 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 0 33 104
2:00-2:15 4 25 0 0 29 0 12 26 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 90
2:15-2:30 0 21 0 0 21 0 21 19 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 23 84
2:30-2:45 1 20 0 0 21 0 31 25 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 0 23 100
2:45-3:00 0 19 0 0 19 0 31 30 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 99
3:00-3:15 2 21 0 0 23 0 27 27 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 94
3:15-3:30 1 18 0 0 19 0 26 28 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 25 98
3:30-3:45 2 22 0 0 24 0 42 28 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 117
3:45-4:00 1 29 0 0 30 1 39 24 0 64 0 1 0 0 1 22 0 1 0 23 118
4:00-4:15 0 26 0 0 26 0 19 23 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 86
4:15-4:30 2 17 0 0 19 0 45 28 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 112
4:30-4:45 0 35 0 0 35 0 30 18 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 17 100
4:45-5:00 0 21 0 0 21 0 34 33 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 108
5:00-5:15 0 17 0 0 17 0 38 32 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 1 26 113
5:15-5:30 1 23 0 0 24 0 45 26 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 25 120
5:30-5:45 0 28 0 0 28 0 44 29 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 1 0 28 129
5:45-6:00 1 41 0 0 42 0 37 41 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 40 160
6:00-6:15 1 22 0 0 23 0 37 35 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 123
6:15-6:30 0 27 0 0 27 0 29 33 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1 0 25 114
12 Hr Totals 64 1194 1 0 1259 1 1025 1403 0 2429 0 1 1 0 2 1102 0 16 1 1119 4809
TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST
TOTALS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT - SUMMARY
Counted by: VCU
Intersection of: W. Ruritan Rd.Date: May 9, 2019 Thursday
and: Side Entrance to Chick-fil-A Weather: Warm, Cloudy
Location: Roanoke County, Virginia Entered by: JBl Star Rating: 4
TOTAL
on: W. Ruritan Rd on: W. Ruritan Rd on: Drivewa on: Chick-fil-A Side Entrance N + S
TIME +
RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL RIGHT THRU LEFT U-TN TOTAL E +
TRAFFIC FROM NORTH TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TRAFFIC FROM EAST TRAFFIC FROM WEST
1 Hr Totals
6:30-7:30 11 149 0 0 160 0 20 97 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 1 0 75 352
6:45-7:45 11 185 0 0 196 0 29 103 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 1 0 85 413
7:00-8:00 9 188 0 0 197 0 34 103 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 1 0 76 410
7:15-8:15 10 191 0 0 201 0 33 96 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 1 0 75 405
7:30-8:30 5 160 0 0 165 0 41 93 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 2 0 74 373
7:45-8:45 5 135 0 0 140 0 38 86 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 2 0 65 329
8:00-9:00 5 123 0 0 128 0 35 86 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 1 0 67 316
8:15-9:15 4 113 0 0 117 0 33 85 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 1 0 61 296
8:30-9:30 6 103 0 0 109 0 39 86 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 63 297
8:45-9:45 5 86 0 0 91 0 42 87 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 65 285
9:00-10:00 5 81 0 0 86 0 47 86 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 1 0 66 285
9:15-10:15 6 73 0 0 79 0 56 89 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 1 0 64 288
9:30-10:30 5 79 0 0 84 0 54 84 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 2 0 59 281
9:45-10:45 5 82 0 0 87 0 59 84 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 2 0 55 285
10:00-11:00 6 85 0 0 91 0 68 78 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 1 0 66 303
10:15-11:15 10 92 0 0 102 0 72 87 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 1 0 81 342
10:30-11:30 9 88 1 0 98 0 72 104 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 1 0 91 365
10:45-11:45 9 74 1 0 84 0 82 129 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 1 0 100 395
11:00-12:00 6 79 1 0 86 0 76 163 0 239 0 0 1 0 1 101 0 1 0 102 428
11:15-12:15 4 74 1 0 79 0 80 183 0 263 0 0 1 0 1 113 0 1 0 114 457
11:30-12:30 4 69 0 0 73 0 83 202 0 285 0 0 1 0 1 130 0 0 0 130 489
11:45-12:45 5 73 0 0 78 0 83 205 0 288 0 0 1 0 1 144 0 0 0 144 511
12:00-1:00 7 59 0 0 66 0 83 203 0 286 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 147 499
12:15-1:15 6 56 0 0 62 0 81 197 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 1 0 153 493
12:30-1:30 6 70 0 0 76 0 86 175 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 2 0 143 480
12:45-1:45 6 80 0 0 86 0 85 150 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 2 0 135 456
1:00-2:00 5 89 0 0 94 0 87 135 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 3 0 135 451
1:15-2:15 7 95 0 0 102 0 79 116 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 2 0 116 413
1:30-2:30 6 90 0 0 96 0 76 102 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 2 0 107 381
1:45-2:45 6 87 0 0 93 0 82 101 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 4 0 102 378
2:00-3:00 5 85 0 0 90 0 95 100 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 3 0 88 373
2:15-3:15 3 81 0 0 84 0 110 101 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 3 0 82 377
2:30-3:30 4 78 0 0 82 0 115 110 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 2 0 84 391
2:45-3:45 5 80 0 0 85 0 126 113 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 84 408
3:00-4:00 6 90 0 0 96 1 134 107 0 242 0 1 0 0 1 87 0 1 0 88 427
3:15-4:15 4 95 0 0 99 1 126 103 0 230 0 1 0 0 1 88 0 1 0 89 419
3:30-4:30 5 94 0 0 99 1 145 103 0 249 0 1 0 0 1 83 0 1 0 84 433
3:45-4:45 3 107 0 0 110 1 133 93 0 227 0 1 0 0 1 76 0 2 0 78 416
4:00-5:00 2 99 0 0 101 0 128 102 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 1 0 75 406
4:15-5:15 2 90 0 0 92 0 147 111 0 258 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 1 1 83 433
4:30-5:30 1 96 0 0 97 0 147 109 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 1 1 88 441
4:45-5:45 1 89 0 0 90 0 161 120 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 1 1 99 470
5:00-6:00 2 109 0 0 111 0 164 128 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 1 1 119 522
5:15-6:15 3 114 0 0 117 0 163 131 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 1 0 121 532
5:30-6:30 2 118 0 0 120 0 147 138 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 2 0 121 526
PEAK HOUR
11:45-12:45 5 73 0 0 78 0 83 205 0 288 0 0 1 0 1 144 0 0 0 144 511
5:15-6:15 3 114 0 0 117 0 163 131 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 1 0 121 532
APPENDIX C
6/24/2019 https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=720&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=9.41&edition=385&locationCode=General Urba…
https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=720&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=9.41&edition=385&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&…1/1
Medical-Dental Office Building(720)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 44
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 32
Directional Distribution: 78% entering, 22% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
2.78 0.85 - 14.30 1.28
Data Plot and Equation
T
=
T
r
i
p
E
n
d
s
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Average RateFitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) + 1.31 R²= 0.80
Trip Generation Manual,10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers
0 50 100 150 2000
100
200
300
400
500
926
27
6/24/2019 https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=720&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=9.41&edition=385&locationCode=General Urba…
https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=720&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=9.41&edition=385&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban&…1/1
Medical-Dental Office Building(720)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 65
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 28
Directional Distribution: 28% entering, 72% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
3.46 0.25 - 8.86 1.58
Data Plot and Equation
T
=
T
r
i
p
E
n
d
s
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Study Site Average RateFitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 3.39(X) + 2.02 R²= 0.73
Trip Generation Manual,10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers
0 50 100 150 2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
933
34
APPENDIX D
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing AM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 217 939 13 12 1628 43 7 7 17 20 0 103
Future Volume (vph) 217 939 13 12 1628 43 7 7 17 20 0 103
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1752 3282 1495 1805 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)97 3282 1495 531 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 233 1010 14 13 1751 46 8 8 18 22 0 111
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 233 1010 9 13 1751 46 0 16 1 20 56 57
Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 10% 8% 0% 5% 5% 0% 0% 12% 30% 0% 27%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Effective Green, g (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.63 0.67 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.21
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 262 2070 1000 329 1848 826 71 55 123 108 255
v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.31 0.00 0.00 c0.51 c0.01 0.02 c0.05 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.49 0.01 0.04 0.95 0.06 0.23 0.01 0.16 0.52 0.22
Uniform Delay, d1 43.5 12.8 7.2 12.5 28.3 14.3 60.6 60.1 54.2 56.1 42.4
Progression Factor 0.62 1.25 1.00 0.67 0.39 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 26.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.9 5.5 0.5
Delay (s)53.2 16.8 7.2 8.4 20.9 7.4 62.8 60.3 55.1 61.6 42.9
Level of Service D B A A C A E E E E D
Approach Delay (s)23.4 20.5 61.5 52.6
Approach LOS C C E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing AM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)79 905 3 0 1471 82 2 0 0 96 1 167
Future Volume (vph)79 905 3 0 1471 82 2 0 0 96 1 167
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)181 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 81 933 3 0 1516 85 2 0 0 99 1 172
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 1 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 154
Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 933 2 0 1516 48 0 2 0 0 100 18
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 12% 0% 0% 6% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2%
Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 3 4 4
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 3 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 74.1 74.1 1.5 13.4 13.4
Effective Green, g (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 74.1 74.1 1.5 13.4 13.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.57 0.57 0.01 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 2186 1095 1941 844 20 182 163
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.29 c0.45 c0.00 c0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.00 0.03 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.43 0.00 0.78 0.06 0.10 0.55 0.11
Uniform Delay, d1 31.1 9.5 6.7 21.7 12.4 63.6 55.4 52.9
Progression Factor 0.57 0.39 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.6 0.0 2.7 0.1 3.0 4.2 0.4
Delay (s)19.5 4.3 6.7 7.9 12.5 66.6 59.6 53.3
Level of Service B A A A B E E D
Approach Delay (s)5.5 8.2 66.6 55.6
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)35.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing AM
19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 917 93 69 1480 64 10
Future Volume (vph)0 917 93 69 1480 64 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 997 101 75 1609 70 11
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 0 0 10
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 997 79 75 1609 70 1
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 11% 4% 1% 5% 14% 10%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 5
Permitted Phases 6 3
Actuated Green, G (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Effective Green, g (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.78 0.06 0.83 0.07 0.13
Clearance Time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s)4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)2316 1214 197 2840 215 186
v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.00 0.02 c0.47 c0.02 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.07 0.38 0.57 0.33 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 7.8 3.2 59.1 3.7 57.5 49.6
Progression Factor 0.59 0.79 1.12 2.12 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.7 1.0 0.0
Delay (s)5.1 2.6 67.5 8.6 58.6 49.6
Level of Service A A E A E D
Approach Delay (s)4.9 11.2 57.4
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing AM
28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 191 10 96 33 0 75
Future Volume (Veh/h) 191 10 96 33 0 75
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 208 11 104 36 0 82
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 274
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 219 458 214
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 219 458 214
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1350 518 827
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 219 140 82
Volume Left 0 104 0
Volume Right 11 0 82
cSH 1700 1350 827
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 6 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 6.0 9.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 6.0 9.8
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background AM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 218 944 13 12 1636 43 7 7 17 20 0 104
Future Volume (vph) 218 944 13 12 1636 43 7 7 17 20 0 104
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1752 3282 1495 1805 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)97 3282 1495 528 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 234 1015 14 13 1759 46 8 8 18 22 0 112
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 1015 9 13 1759 46 0 16 1 20 57 57
Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 10% 8% 0% 5% 5% 0% 0% 12% 30% 0% 27%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Effective Green, g (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.63 0.67 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.21
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 262 2070 1000 328 1848 826 71 55 123 108 255
v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.31 0.00 0.00 c0.51 c0.01 0.02 c0.05 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.49 0.01 0.04 0.95 0.06 0.23 0.01 0.16 0.53 0.22
Uniform Delay, d1 43.7 12.8 7.2 12.5 28.5 14.3 60.6 60.1 54.2 56.2 42.4
Progression Factor 0.62 1.26 1.00 0.67 0.39 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 27.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.9 5.9 0.5
Delay (s)54.3 16.8 7.2 8.4 21.4 7.4 62.8 60.3 55.1 62.1 42.9
Level of Service D B A A C A E E E E D
Approach Delay (s)23.7 20.9 61.5 52.9
Approach LOS C C E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background AM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)79 910 3 0 1478 82 2 0 0 96 1 168
Future Volume (vph)79 910 3 0 1478 82 2 0 0 96 1 168
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)178 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 81 938 3 0 1524 85 2 0 0 99 1 173
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 1 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 155
Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 938 2 0 1524 48 0 2 0 0 100 18
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 12% 0% 0% 6% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2%
Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 3 4 4
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 3 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 74.1 74.1 1.5 13.4 13.4
Effective Green, g (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 74.1 74.1 1.5 13.4 13.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.57 0.57 0.01 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 190 2186 1095 1941 844 20 182 163
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.29 c0.45 c0.00 c0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.00 0.03 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.79 0.06 0.10 0.55 0.11
Uniform Delay, d1 31.6 9.5 6.7 21.8 12.4 63.6 55.4 52.9
Progression Factor 0.57 0.40 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.6 0.0 2.8 0.1 3.0 4.2 0.4
Delay (s)19.7 4.4 6.7 8.1 12.5 66.6 59.6 53.3
Level of Service B A A A B E E D
Approach Delay (s)5.6 8.4 66.6 55.6
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)35.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background AM
19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 922 93 69 1487 64 10
Future Volume (vph)0 922 93 69 1487 64 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1002 101 75 1616 70 11
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 0 0 10
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1002 79 75 1616 70 1
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 11% 4% 1% 5% 14% 10%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 5
Permitted Phases 6 3
Actuated Green, G (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Effective Green, g (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.78 0.06 0.83 0.07 0.13
Clearance Time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s)4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)2316 1214 197 2840 215 186
v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.00 0.02 c0.47 c0.02 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.07 0.38 0.57 0.33 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 7.8 3.2 59.1 3.7 57.5 49.6
Progression Factor 0.59 0.78 1.12 2.14 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.7 1.0 0.0
Delay (s)5.1 2.6 67.6 8.6 58.6 49.6
Level of Service A A E A E D
Approach Delay (s)4.9 11.3 57.4
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background AM
28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 10 96 33 0 75
Future Volume (Veh/h) 192 10 96 33 0 75
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 209 11 104 36 0 82
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 273
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 220 458 214
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 220 458 214
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1349 517 825
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 220 140 82
Volume Left 0 104 0
Volume Right 11 0 82
cSH 1700 1349 825
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 6 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 6.0 9.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 6.0 9.8
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Description: Chick-fil-A
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout AM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 218 952 13 12 1638 43 7 7 17 20 0 104
Future Volume (vph) 218 952 13 12 1638 43 7 7 17 20 0 104
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1752 3282 1495 1805 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)97 3282 1495 521 3438 1538 1854 1442 1319 1161 1208
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 234 1024 14 13 1761 46 8 8 18 22 0 112
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 1024 9 13 1761 46 0 16 1 20 57 57
Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 10% 8% 0% 5% 5% 0% 0% 12% 30% 0% 27%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Effective Green, g (s) 91.2 82.0 87.0 73.1 69.9 69.9 5.0 5.0 12.2 12.2 27.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.63 0.67 0.56 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.21
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 262 2070 1000 324 1848 826 71 55 123 108 255
v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.31 0.00 0.00 c0.51 c0.01 0.02 c0.05 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.49 0.01 0.04 0.95 0.06 0.23 0.01 0.16 0.53 0.22
Uniform Delay, d1 43.7 12.9 7.2 12.6 28.5 14.3 60.6 60.1 54.2 56.2 42.4
Progression Factor 0.62 1.26 1.00 0.67 0.37 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 27.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.9 5.9 0.5
Delay (s)54.5 16.9 7.2 8.4 20.6 7.4 62.8 60.3 55.1 62.1 42.9
Level of Service D B A A C A E E E E D
Approach Delay (s)23.7 20.1 61.5 52.9
Approach LOS C C E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout AM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)87 910 3 0 1478 95 2 0 0 100 1 170
Future Volume (vph)87 910 3 0 1478 95 2 0 0 100 1 170
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)168 3223 1615 3406 1482 1805 1775 1583
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 90 938 3 0 1524 98 2 0 0 103 1 175
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 1 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 156
Lane Group Flow (vph) 90 938 2 0 1524 54 0 2 0 0 104 19
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 12% 0% 0% 6% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2%
Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 3 4 4
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 3 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 87.6 87.6 87.6 72.0 72.0 1.5 14.0 14.0
Effective Green, g (s) 87.6 87.6 87.6 72.0 72.0 1.5 14.0 14.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.11 0.11
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 9.2
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 201 2171 1088 1886 820 20 191 170
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.29 c0.45 c0.00 c0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.00 0.04 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.43 0.00 0.81 0.07 0.10 0.54 0.11
Uniform Delay, d1 34.8 9.8 6.9 23.4 13.4 63.6 55.0 52.4
Progression Factor 0.57 0.38 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.6 0.0 3.2 0.1 3.0 3.9 0.4
Delay (s)21.6 4.3 6.9 9.5 13.6 66.6 58.9 52.8
Level of Service C A A A B E E D
Approach Delay (s)5.9 9.7 66.6 55.1
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 12.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)35.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.8% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout AM
19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 926 93 69 1500 64 10
Future Volume (vph)0 926 93 69 1500 64 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)3252 1553 3467 3438 3072 1468
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1007 101 75 1630 70 11
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 0 0 10
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1007 79 75 1630 70 1
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 11% 4% 1% 5% 14% 10%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 3 5
Permitted Phases 6 3
Actuated Green, G (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Effective Green, g (s)92.6 101.7 7.4 107.4 9.1 16.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.78 0.06 0.83 0.07 0.13
Clearance Time (s)5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s)4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)2316 1214 197 2840 215 186
v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.00 0.02 c0.47 c0.02 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.07 0.38 0.57 0.33 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 7.8 3.2 59.1 3.7 57.5 49.6
Progression Factor 0.55 0.95 1.13 2.19 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.0
Delay (s)4.9 3.1 68.1 8.9 58.6 49.6
Level of Service A A E A E D
Approach Delay (s)4.7 11.5 57.4
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout AM
28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 10 96 54 0 75
Future Volume (Veh/h) 192 10 96 54 0 75
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 209 11 104 59 0 82
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 273
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 220 482 214
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 220 482 214
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1349 502 825
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 220 163 82
Volume Left 0 104 0
Volume Right 11 0 82
cSH 1700 1349 825
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 6 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 5.3 9.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 5.3 9.8
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Description: Chick-fil-A
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout AM
29: W Ruritan Rd & Site 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 AM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 202 33 21 6 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 202 33 21 6 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0%0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 220 36 23 7 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 332
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 59 268 48
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 59 268 48
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %100 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1545 722 1022
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 SW 1
Volume Total 220 59 7
Volume Left 0 0 7
Volume Right 0 23 0
cSH 1545 1700 722
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.0
Lane LOS B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.0
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing PM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)95 1558 23 40 1302 18 44 4 56 89 10 266
Future Volume (vph)95 1558 23 40 1302 18 44 4 56 89 10 266
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1467 3505 1615 1805 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)156 3505 1615 115 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1657 24 43 1385 19 47 4 60 95 11 283
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 57 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 1657 15 43 1385 10 0 51 3 85 154 150
Heavy Vehicles (%) 23% 3% 0% 0% 6% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 3%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Effective Green, g (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.55 0.55 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.20
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 190 2015 1002 146 1880 594 83 73 229 199 305
v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.47 0.00 0.01 0.41 c0.03 0.05 c0.11 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.82 0.01 0.29 0.74 0.02 0.61 0.04 0.37 0.77 0.49
Uniform Delay, d1 17.7 24.0 10.2 20.4 23.7 14.2 65.6 63.9 55.0 58.4 49.2
Progression Factor 1.92 0.31 1.00 1.96 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.5 0.0 1.1 2.1 0.0 14.5 0.3 1.4 17.9 1.5
Delay (s)35.9 10.0 10.2 41.0 19.6 14.2 80.1 64.1 56.4 76.2 50.7
Level of Service D B B D B B F E E E D
Approach Delay (s)11.5 20.1 71.5 62.0
Approach LOS B C E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing PM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 163 1494 50 11 1234 121 27 3 32 95 1 86
Future Volume (vph) 163 1494 50 11 1234 121 27 3 32 95 1 86
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3505 1615 1641 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)286 3505 1615 103 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adj. Flow (vph) 166 1524 51 11 1259 123 28 3 33 97 1 88
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 50 0 0 32 0 0 80
Lane Group Flow (vph) 166 1524 33 11 1259 73 0 31 1 0 98 8
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 0% 10% 7% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 8 7 7 8 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 84.7 84.7 90.9 70.0 70.0 82.8 6.2 6.2 12.8 12.8
Effective Green, g (s) 84.7 84.7 90.9 70.0 70.0 82.8 6.2 6.2 12.8 12.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.65 0.50 0.50 0.59 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 360 2120 1048 82 1687 944 80 71 165 147
v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.43 0.00 0.00 c0.37 0.01 c0.02 c0.05
v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.02 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.46 0.72 0.03 0.13 0.75 0.08 0.39 0.02 0.59 0.05
Uniform Delay, d1 33.6 19.3 8.8 24.9 27.9 12.2 65.1 64.0 61.1 58.1
Progression Factor 0.44 0.38 1.00 0.48 0.43 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.4 0.0 0.8 2.8 0.0 4.2 0.2 6.6 0.2
Delay (s)15.4 8.7 8.8 12.9 14.8 0.9 69.3 64.2 67.7 58.3
Level of Service B A A B B A E E E E
Approach Delay (s)9.3 13.5 66.6 63.2
Approach LOS A B E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)33.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.4% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing PM
20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)1 1373 256 144 1245 149 42
Future Volume (vph)1 1373 256 144 1245 149 42
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1387 259 145 1258 151 42
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 41 0 0 0 35
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1387 218 145 1258 151 7
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 3% 2% 3% 8% 1% 5%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 5
Permitted Phases 6 7
Actuated Green, G (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Effective Green, g (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.68 0.77 0.08 0.75 0.09 0.17
Clearance Time (s) 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)28 2388 1213 286 2507 294 260
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.40 0.02 0.04 c0.38 c0.04 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.58 0.18 0.51 0.50 0.51 0.03
Uniform Delay, d1 67.9 11.8 4.4 61.3 7.0 61.3 48.5
Progression Factor 0.83 0.30 0.27 1.40 0.23 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.8 0.1 1.6 0.7 1.8 0.1
Delay (s)57.0 4.3 1.3 87.6 2.3 63.0 48.6
Level of Service E A A F A E D
Approach Delay (s)3.9 11.1 59.9
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 Existing PM
29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 1 109 147 0 88
Future Volume (Veh/h) 96 1 109 147 0 88
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 104 1 118 160 0 96
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 278
pX, platoon unblocked 0.97
vC, conflicting volume 105 500 104
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 105 465 104
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1486 494 950
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 105 278 96
Volume Left 0 118 0
Volume Right 1 0 96
cSH 1700 1486 950
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 6 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.6 9.2
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 3.6 9.2
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Description: Chick-fil-A
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background PM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)95 1566 23 40 1309 18 44 4 56 89 10 267
Future Volume (vph)95 1566 23 40 1309 18 44 4 56 89 10 267
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1467 3505 1615 1805 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)153 3505 1615 111 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1666 24 43 1393 19 47 4 60 95 11 284
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 57 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 1666 15 43 1393 10 0 51 3 85 154 151
Heavy Vehicles (%) 23% 3% 0% 0% 6% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 3%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Effective Green, g (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.55 0.55 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.20
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 2015 1002 143 1880 594 83 73 229 199 305
v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.48 0.00 0.01 0.41 c0.03 0.05 c0.11 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.83 0.01 0.30 0.74 0.02 0.61 0.04 0.37 0.77 0.50
Uniform Delay, d1 17.9 24.1 10.2 20.7 23.8 14.2 65.6 63.9 55.0 58.4 49.2
Progression Factor 1.92 0.32 1.00 1.98 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 2.6 0.0 1.1 2.1 0.0 14.5 0.3 1.4 17.9 1.5
Delay (s)36.4 10.2 10.2 41.9 19.7 14.2 80.1 64.1 56.4 76.2 50.7
Level of Service D B B D B B F E E E D
Approach Delay (s)11.7 20.3 71.5 62.0
Approach LOS B C E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background PM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 164 1501 50 11 1240 122 27 3 32 95 1 86
Future Volume (vph) 164 1501 50 11 1240 122 27 3 32 95 1 86
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3505 1615 1641 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)283 3505 1615 103 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adj. Flow (vph) 167 1532 51 11 1265 124 28 3 33 97 1 88
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 51 0 0 32 0 0 80
Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 1532 33 11 1265 73 0 31 1 0 98 8
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 0% 10% 7% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 8 7 7 8 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 84.8 84.8 90.9 70.1 70.1 82.9 6.1 6.1 12.8 12.8
Effective Green, g (s) 84.8 84.8 90.9 70.1 70.1 82.9 6.1 6.1 12.8 12.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.65 0.50 0.50 0.59 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 359 2123 1048 82 1689 945 79 70 165 147
v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.44 0.00 0.00 c0.37 0.01 c0.02 c0.05
v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.02 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.72 0.03 0.13 0.75 0.08 0.39 0.02 0.59 0.05
Uniform Delay, d1 33.6 19.3 8.8 25.0 27.9 12.2 65.1 64.1 61.1 58.1
Progression Factor 0.44 0.37 1.00 0.48 0.43 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.4 0.0 0.8 2.8 0.0 4.3 0.2 6.6 0.2
Delay (s)15.4 8.6 8.8 12.9 14.9 0.9 69.5 64.3 67.7 58.3
Level of Service B A A B B A E E E E
Approach Delay (s)9.2 13.6 66.8 63.2
Approach LOS A B E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)33.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background PM
20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)1 1380 257 145 1251 150 42
Future Volume (vph)1 1380 257 145 1251 150 42
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1394 260 146 1264 152 42
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 0 35
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1394 220 146 1264 152 7
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 3% 2% 3% 8% 1% 5%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 5
Permitted Phases 6 7
Actuated Green, G (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Effective Green, g (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.68 0.77 0.08 0.75 0.09 0.17
Clearance Time (s) 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)28 2388 1213 286 2507 294 260
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.40 0.02 0.04 c0.38 c0.04 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.58 0.18 0.51 0.50 0.52 0.03
Uniform Delay, d1 67.9 11.8 4.4 61.3 7.0 61.3 48.5
Progression Factor 0.82 0.29 0.27 1.39 0.23 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.8 0.1 1.7 0.7 1.8 0.1
Delay (s)55.8 4.2 1.2 87.1 2.3 63.1 48.6
Level of Service E A A F A E D
Approach Delay (s)3.8 11.1 59.9
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Background PM
29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 4
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 1 110 148 0 88
Future Volume (Veh/h) 96 1 110 148 0 88
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 104 1 120 161 0 96
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 278
pX, platoon unblocked 0.97
vC, conflicting volume 105 506 104
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 105 470 104
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1486 490 950
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 105 281 96
Volume Left 0 120 0
Volume Right 1 0 96
cSH 1700 1486 950
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 7 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.7 9.2
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 3.7 9.2
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Description: Chick-fil-A
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout PM
55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)95 1570 23 40 1319 18 44 4 56 89 10 267
Future Volume (vph)95 1570 23 40 1319 18 44 4 56 89 10 267
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1467 3505 1615 1805 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)149 3505 1615 110 3406 1077 1816 1615 1681 1460 1490
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1670 24 43 1403 19 47 4 60 95 11 284
RTOR Reduction (vph)0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 57 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 1670 15 43 1403 10 0 51 3 85 154 151
Heavy Vehicles (%) 23% 3% 0% 0% 6% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 3%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 7 8 8 1
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Effective Green, g (s) 90.1 80.5 86.9 83.7 77.3 77.3 6.4 6.4 19.1 19.1 28.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.55 0.55 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.20
Clearance Time (s)6.0 7.0 6.4 6.0 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.4 8.2 8.2 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 8.0 4.0 3.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 2015 1002 143 1880 594 83 73 229 199 305
v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.48 0.00 0.01 0.41 c0.03 0.05 c0.11 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.83 0.01 0.30 0.75 0.02 0.61 0.04 0.37 0.77 0.50
Uniform Delay, d1 18.2 24.2 10.2 20.8 23.9 14.2 65.6 63.9 55.0 58.4 49.2
Progression Factor 1.91 0.32 1.00 2.01 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.7 0.0 1.1 2.2 0.0 14.5 0.3 1.4 17.9 1.5
Delay (s)37.0 10.3 10.2 42.8 19.8 14.2 80.1 64.1 56.4 76.2 50.7
Level of Service D B B D B B F E E E D
Approach Delay (s)11.8 20.4 71.5 62.0
Approach LOS B C E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)27.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout PM
1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 168 1501 50 11 1240 128 27 3 32 109 1 96
Future Volume (vph) 168 1501 50 11 1240 128 27 3 32 109 1 96
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1787 3505 1615 1641 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)280 3505 1615 104 3374 1468 1818 1615 1810 1615
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adj. Flow (vph) 171 1532 51 11 1265 131 28 3 33 111 1 98
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 53 0 0 32 0 0 89
Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 1532 33 11 1265 78 0 31 1 0 112 9
Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 0% 10% 7% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 8 7 7 8 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 7 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 84.2 84.2 90.3 69.5 69.5 82.9 6.1 6.1 13.4 13.4
Effective Green, g (s) 84.2 84.2 90.3 69.5 69.5 82.9 6.1 6.1 13.4 13.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.50 0.50 0.59 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s)8.5 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 9.2 9.2 7.3 7.3
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 2108 1041 82 1674 945 79 70 173 154
v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.44 0.00 0.00 c0.37 0.01 c0.02 c0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.02 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.73 0.03 0.13 0.76 0.08 0.39 0.02 0.65 0.06
Uniform Delay, d1 34.1 19.8 9.0 25.5 28.4 12.2 65.1 64.1 61.0 57.6
Progression Factor 0.44 0.37 1.00 0.48 0.43 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.4 0.0 0.8 2.9 0.0 4.3 0.2 9.0 0.2
Delay (s)15.8 8.7 9.0 13.1 15.2 0.7 69.5 64.3 70.0 57.8
Level of Service B A A B B A E E E E
Approach Delay (s)9.4 13.8 66.8 64.3
Approach LOS A B E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)33.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.3% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout PM
20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)1 1394 257 145 1257 150 42
Future Volume (vph)1 1394 257 145 1257 150 42
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s)7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1805 3505 1583 3400 3343 3467 1538
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1408 260 146 1270 152 42
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 0 35
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1408 220 146 1270 152 7
Heavy Vehicles (%)0% 3% 2% 3% 8% 1% 5%
Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot pm+ov
Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 5
Permitted Phases 6 7
Actuated Green, G (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Effective Green, g (s) 2.2 95.4 107.3 11.8 105.0 11.9 23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.68 0.77 0.08 0.75 0.09 0.17
Clearance Time (s) 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4 5.6 7.9 7.4
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
Lane Grp Cap (vph)28 2388 1213 286 2507 294 260
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.40 0.02 0.04 c0.38 c0.04 0.00
v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.59 0.18 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.03
Uniform Delay, d1 67.9 11.9 4.4 61.3 7.1 61.3 48.5
Progression Factor 0.85 0.28 0.29 1.37 0.24 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.8 0.1 1.7 0.7 1.8 0.1
Delay (s)58.3 4.2 1.3 85.8 2.4 63.1 48.6
Level of Service E A A F A E D
Approach Delay (s)3.8 11.0 59.9
Approach LOS A B E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)20.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout PM
29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 1 110 158 0 88
Future Volume (Veh/h) 96 1 110 158 0 88
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0%0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 104 1 120 172 0 96
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 278
pX, platoon unblocked 0.96
vC, conflicting volume 105 516 104
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 105 479 104
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %92 100 90
cM capacity (veh/h)1486 483 950
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 NE 1
Volume Total 105 292 96
Volume Left 0 120 0
Volume Right 1 0 96
cSH 1700 1486 950
Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.08 0.10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 7 8
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.5 9.2
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s)0.0 3.5 9.2
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Description: Chick-fil-A
HCM 2000 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 Buildout PM
16: W Ruritan Rd & Site 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County 05/09/2019 Alt 4 PM - updated volumes Synchro 10 Report
vtwh Page 5
Movement SEL SET NWT NWR SWL SWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 97 148 10 24 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 97 148 10 24 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0%0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 105 161 11 26 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 337
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 172 272 166
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 172 272 166
tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free %100 96 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1405 718 878
Direction, Lane #SE 1 NW 1 SW 1
Volume Total 105 172 26
Volume Left 0 0 26
Volume Right 0 11 0
cSH 1405 1700 718
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.10 0.04
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.2
Lane LOS B
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.2
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
APPENDIX E
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9780 9882 9871 9826 9703 9793 9859
Vehs Exited 9756 9934 9880 9799 9681 9755 9862
Starting Vehs 859 946 905 879 886 858 894
Ending Vehs 883 894 896 906 908 896 891
Travel Distance (mi)21674 22111 22100 21652 21316 21657 21658
Travel Time (hr)910.4 940.4 946.8 923.8 892.6 923.0 923.1
Total Delay (hr)296.1 313.8 320.2 308.7 285.2 308.6 308.2
Total Stops 17223 17913 17803 17770 16712 17716 17576
Fuel Used (gal)736.1 755.1 754.2 736.4 719.4 737.8 739.4
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9861 9718 9856 9813
Vehs Exited 9863 9774 9841 9817
Starting Vehs 881 928 941 894
Ending Vehs 879 872 956 888
Travel Distance (mi)21786 21698 21665 21732
Travel Time (hr)930.9 916.0 942.0 924.9
Total Delay (hr)311.8 302.2 326.0 308.1
Total Stops 17901 17482 18419 17650
Fuel Used (gal)743.0 737.3 743.3 740.2
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:00
End Time 7:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2618 2654 2629 2569 2546 2582 2666
Vehs Exited 2508 2610 2542 2500 2527 2460 2588
Starting Vehs 859 946 905 879 886 858 894
Ending Vehs 969 990 992 948 905 980 972
Travel Distance (mi)5638 5873 5845 5586 5523 5556 5552
Travel Time (hr)239.0 250.2 248.1 242.6 231.1 237.9 240.3
Total Delay (hr)79.4 84.1 82.8 84.0 74.3 80.3 82.0
Total Stops 4564 4664 4602 4637 4299 4716 4734
Fuel Used (gal) 192.3 201.7 199.4 192.3 186.2 189.8 190.0
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2645 2619 2633 2613
Vehs Exited 2524 2573 2561 2538
Starting Vehs 881 928 941 894
Ending Vehs 1002 974 1013 970
Travel Distance (mi) 5543 5667 5578 5636
Travel Time (hr)238.3 242.4 240.2 241.0
Total Delay (hr)80.7 81.9 82.0 81.2
Total Stops 4640 4692 4800 4638
Fuel Used (gal) 189.5 194.1 191.2 192.6
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2421 2350 2369 2317 2369 2466 2357
Vehs Exited 2507 2438 2487 2422 2425 2536 2427
Starting Vehs 969 990 992 948 905 980 972
Ending Vehs 883 902 874 843 849 910 902
Travel Distance (mi)5605 5404 5377 5325 5347 5533 5458
Travel Time (hr)237.9 229.8 231.9 227.3 221.3 241.3 232.9
Total Delay (hr)78.7 76.8 78.8 75.7 68.8 84.1 78.5
Total Stops 4464 4372 4360 4406 4029 4615 4316
Fuel Used (gal) 190.8 184.3 183.9 179.7 179.1 191.0 186.4
Interval #2 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2434 2328 2482 0
Vehs Exited 2521 2426 2538 0
Starting Vehs 1002 974 1013 0
Ending Vehs 915 876 957 0
Travel Distance (mi)5573 5365 5637 0
Travel Time (hr)237.6 225.7 246.4 0.0
Total Delay (hr)79.2 73.7 86.6 0.0
Total Stops 4450 4106 4729 0
Fuel Used (gal) 190.1 182.9 195.3 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2368 2456 2484 2490 2404 2371 2405
Vehs Exited 2366 2427 2389 2437 2376 2416 2426
Starting Vehs 883 902 874 843 849 910 902
Ending Vehs 885 931 969 896 877 865 881
Travel Distance (mi)5133 5427 5431 5365 5110 5384 5294
Travel Time (hr)210.7 230.3 230.8 226.9 216.6 224.4 221.5
Total Delay (hr)65.1 76.2 77.0 74.2 70.6 72.1 71.1
Total Stops 3971 4446 4409 4299 4230 4164 4125
Fuel Used (gal) 172.5 185.1 184.1 181.4 173.0 181.3 179.6
Interval #3 Information Recording
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2370 2423 2323 0
Vehs Exited 2415 2364 2403 0
Starting Vehs 915 876 957 0
Ending Vehs 870 935 877 0
Travel Distance (mi)5415 5413 5290 0
Travel Time (hr)233.1 225.7 229.8 0.0
Total Delay (hr)79.4 73.5 79.3 0.0
Total Stops 4546 4339 4533 0
Fuel Used (gal) 184.2 182.6 181.3 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2373 2422 2389 2450 2384 2374 2431
Vehs Exited 2375 2459 2462 2440 2353 2343 2421
Starting Vehs 885 931 969 896 877 865 881
Ending Vehs 883 894 896 906 908 896 891
Travel Distance (mi)5298 5406 5447 5375 5336 5185 5354
Travel Time (hr)222.9 230.1 236.0 227.0 223.6 219.4 228.4
Total Delay (hr)72.9 76.8 81.7 74.9 71.4 72.0 76.5
Total Stops 4224 4431 4432 4428 4154 4221 4401
Fuel Used (gal) 180.4 183.9 186.9 183.0 181.1 175.7 183.4
Interval #4 Information Recording
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2412 2348 2418 0
Vehs Exited 2403 2411 2339 0
Starting Vehs 870 935 877 0
Ending Vehs 879 872 956 0
Travel Distance (mi)5255 5253 5160 0
Travel Time (hr)221.9 222.2 225.6 0.0
Total Delay (hr)72.6 73.1 78.0 0.0
Total Stops 4265 4345 4357 0
Fuel Used (gal) 179.3 177.7 175.6 0.0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B25 B25 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 291 325 348 22 166 499 520 390 21 37 58 63
Average Queue (ft) 142 101 119 3 15 277 290 24 2 3 15 15
95th Queue (ft)252 247 272 15 78 493 502 178 27 38 44 46
Link Distance (ft)2253 2253 507 507 1298 1298 740 740
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)7 9
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 23 5 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 3 2 0
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 116 180 148
Average Queue (ft) 24 86 41
95th Queue (ft)74 158 111
Link Distance (ft)1155 1155
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 134 198 209 9 55 372 372 176 22 180 163
Average Queue (ft) 48 54 64 0 2 122 121 17 3 85 85
95th Queue (ft)101 139 152 5 35 267 267 91 16 160 152
Link Distance (ft)1298 1298 754 754 832 173
Upstream Blk Time (%)2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)5 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 310 232 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 2 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 2 0 3 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 227 246 75 57 80 202 198 61 113 41
Average Queue (ft) 68 66 11 16 39 65 63 12 38 6
95th Queue (ft)162 164 51 44 72 156 154 40 89 25
Link Distance (ft)754 754 5103 5103 996 996
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 AM Exist
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 08/02/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)52 75 64
Average Queue (ft)4 19 33
95th Queue (ft)32 56 54
Link Distance (ft)1462 173 182
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9901 9934 9976 9807 9966 9764 9759
Vehs Exited 9908 9993 9931 9843 9891 9795 9827
Starting Vehs 840 982 927 904 886 927 941
Ending Vehs 833 923 972 868 961 896 873
Travel Distance (mi)21621 21953 22010 21503 22063 21723 21720
Travel Time (hr)919.6 970.1 942.9 925.5 946.1 922.8 935.6
Total Delay (hr)307.3 345.9 320.3 316.5 320.0 307.4 319.9
Total Stops 17621 18341 18282 17763 18096 17726 18014
Fuel Used (gal)737.9 753.7 751.4 735.8 751.5 740.8 744.5
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9Gale FSED Facility)\SYNCHRO\3982_AM_2020_Background Avg
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9823 9791 9690 9883 9840
Vehs Exited 9840 9869 9683 9890 9857
Starting Vehs 895 977 896 951 914
Ending Vehs 878 899 903 944 895
Travel Distance (mi)21834 21719 21563 22010 21793
Travel Time (hr)917.5 935.8 902.1 944.2 932.9
Total Delay (hr)300.4 318.0 291.2 321.3 315.3
Total Stops 17038 17759 16669 18222 17774
Fuel Used (gal)742.5 739.4 731.0 753.8 743.8
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:00
End Time 7:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2684 2733 2646 2649 2621 2610 2648
Vehs Exited 2533 2694 2608 2578 2556 2564 2567
Starting Vehs 840 982 927 904 886 927 941
Ending Vehs 991 1021 965 975 951 973 1022
Travel Distance (mi)5585 5779 5749 5612 5614 5698 5703
Travel Time (hr)238.7 257.0 241.9 245.4 240.6 246.0 243.0
Total Delay (hr)80.5 92.4 79.3 86.8 81.1 84.5 82.0
Total Stops 4674 5018 4485 4822 4588 4883 4590
Fuel Used (gal) 190.5 198.5 195.8 193.0 191.0 195.7 196.6
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9Gale FSED Facility)\SYNCHRO\3982_AM_2020_Background Avg
Vehs Entered 2675 2624 2571 2647 2644
Vehs Exited 2552 2619 2517 2578 2576
Starting Vehs 895 977 896 951 914
Ending Vehs 1018 982 950 1020 986
Travel Distance (mi) 5715 5617 5545 5741 5669
Travel Time (hr)247.2 245.3 233.1 251.9 244.6
Total Delay (hr)85.6 85.6 76.0 88.8 83.9
Total Stops 4759 4699 4497 4856 4710
Fuel Used (gal) 197.1 192.4 188.8 197.4 194.3
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2480 2382 2369 2411 2440 2445 2418
Vehs Exited 2522 2471 2466 2497 2469 2541 2524
Starting Vehs 991 1021 965 975 951 973 1022
Ending Vehs 949 932 868 889 922 877 916
Travel Distance (mi)5562 5479 5357 5393 5495 5527 5393
Travel Time (hr)243.4 242.9 229.6 235.6 234.1 232.2 242.6
Total Delay (hr)85.8 87.5 78.3 82.5 77.7 75.6 89.5
Total Stops 4681 4400 4339 4433 4392 4294 4833
Fuel Used (gal) 191.4 189.0 182.7 185.5 186.2 188.4 187.0
Interval #2 Information Recording
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9Gale FSED Facility)\SYNCHRO\3982_AM_2020_Background Avg
Vehs Entered 2362 2360 2405 2418 2403
Vehs Exited 2544 2477 2474 2545 2503
Starting Vehs 1018 982 950 1020 986
Ending Vehs 836 865 881 893 890
Travel Distance (mi)5560 5437 5475 5653 5485
Travel Time (hr)239.0 228.3 231.3 237.8 236.1
Total Delay (hr)81.8 74.2 76.3 78.4 80.7
Total Stops 4507 4201 4253 4459 4433
Fuel Used (gal) 190.9 184.0 186.2 193.4 187.7
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2366 2423 2469 2347 2447 2347 2348
Vehs Exited 2473 2445 2387 2356 2431 2325 2403
Starting Vehs 949 932 868 889 922 877 916
Ending Vehs 842 910 950 880 938 899 861
Travel Distance (mi)5281 5310 5400 5155 5360 5285 5333
Travel Time (hr)222.6 233.5 234.2 220.7 232.9 220.5 226.9
Total Delay (hr)73.0 82.2 81.1 74.6 80.6 71.5 75.5
Total Stops 4285 4450 4770 4359 4554 4153 4198
Fuel Used (gal) 180.2 181.4 184.7 176.6 183.4 180.0 181.5
Interval #3 Information Recording
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9Gale FSED Facility)\SYNCHRO\3982_AM_2020_Background Avg
Vehs Entered 2404 2391 2306 2384 2386
Vehs Exited 2385 2347 2365 2406 2392
Starting Vehs 836 865 881 893 890
Ending Vehs 855 909 822 871 885
Travel Distance (mi)5300 5347 5248 5286 5300
Travel Time (hr)215.2 230.1 217.0 219.3 224.8
Total Delay (hr)65.6 77.7 68.1 70.1 74.5
Total Stops 3857 4349 3896 3983 4257
Fuel Used (gal) 178.6 181.3 175.9 178.4 180.2
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2371 2396 2492 2400 2458 2362 2345
Vehs Exited 2380 2383 2470 2412 2435 2365 2333
Starting Vehs 842 910 950 880 938 899 861
Ending Vehs 833 923 972 868 961 896 873
Travel Distance (mi)5193 5385 5505 5343 5594 5212 5290
Travel Time (hr)214.8 236.7 237.2 223.8 238.4 224.1 223.0
Total Delay (hr)68.1 83.9 81.6 72.6 80.6 75.8 73.0
Total Stops 3981 4473 4688 4149 4562 4396 4393
Fuel Used (gal) 175.7 184.7 188.2 180.8 190.8 176.7 179.4
Interval #4 Information Recording
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9Gale FSED Facility)\SYNCHRO\3982_AM_2020_Background Avg
Vehs Entered 2382 2416 2408 2434 2406
Vehs Exited 2359 2426 2327 2361 2387
Starting Vehs 855 909 822 871 885
Ending Vehs 878 899 903 944 895
Travel Distance (mi)5259 5318 5295 5330 5339
Travel Time (hr)216.1 232.1 220.8 235.2 227.5
Total Delay (hr)67.4 80.5 70.8 84.1 76.2
Total Stops 3915 4510 4023 4924 4365
Fuel Used (gal) 175.9 181.6 180.1 184.6 181.7
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B25 B25 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 322 301 319 23 164 551 556 249 130 132 58 56
Average Queue (ft) 154 102 121 2 17 296 306 20 10 12 14 16
95th Queue (ft)273 242 267 15 79 525 532 163 90 96 44 46
Link Distance (ft)2253 2253 507 507 1298 1298 740 740
Upstream Blk Time (%)3 3
Queuing Penalty (veh)23 28
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 25 7 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 3 0
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft)84 186 160
Average Queue (ft)24 84 41
95th Queue (ft)66 155 115
Link Distance (ft)1155 1155
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R T T R LT LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 133 259 282 6 440 444 195 34 185 164
Average Queue (ft) 51 57 68 0 133 133 19 3 85 86
95th Queue (ft)109 158 173 3 313 319 105 17 162 153
Link Distance (ft)1298 1298 754 754 832 173
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)4 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 232 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 3 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 2 0 3 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 249 257 129 66 86 216 217 53 102 32
Average Queue (ft) 74 72 12 15 40 69 65 10 39 5
95th Queue (ft)178 182 70 47 77 166 164 36 81 19
Link Distance (ft)754 754 5103 5103 996 996
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Background
Alt 4 AM - updated BACKGROUND 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)45 90 66
Average Queue (ft)3 20 32
95th Queue (ft)23 61 54
Link Distance (ft)1462 173 182
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9975 9926 9851 9949 9719 10013 9776
Vehs Exited 9882 9899 9904 9887 9748 10098 9815
Starting Vehs 864 928 930 898 909 974 926
Ending Vehs 957 955 877 960 880 889 887
Travel Distance (mi)21646 21902 21810 21944 21445 22379 21706
Travel Time (hr)938.4 940.5 932.4 944.4 917.5 991.9 930.7
Total Delay (hr)322.4 318.6 313.8 321.6 309.3 356.7 315.8
Total Stops 18485 18084 18112 18436 17769 19691 17940
Fuel Used (gal)740.0 747.9 743.4 749.8 731.8 775.4 741.0
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Start Time 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00
End Time 8:15 8:15 8:15 8:15
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 9706 9729 9733 9836
Vehs Exited 9721 9759 9692 9840
Starting Vehs 880 903 894 902
Ending Vehs 865 873 935 905
Travel Distance (mi)21657 21427 21205 21712
Travel Time (hr)914.9 908.6 895.6 931.5
Total Delay (hr)300.4 299.9 294.9 315.3
Total Stops 17282 17436 17317 18059
Fuel Used (gal)736.6 726.3 723.4 741.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:00
End Time 7:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2718 2672 2670 2619 2573 2622 2640
Vehs Exited 2558 2574 2613 2500 2547 2545 2554
Starting Vehs 864 928 930 898 909 974 926
Ending Vehs 1024 1026 987 1017 935 1051 1012
Travel Distance (mi) 5735 5668 5745 5651 5650 5685 5460
Travel Time (hr)249.4 244.9 249.4 245.3 244.5 252.6 240.6
Total Delay (hr)86.6 83.8 86.9 85.2 84.6 91.3 85.1
Total Stops 4909 4666 4792 4872 4733 5194 4843
Fuel Used (gal) 196.4 193.3 197.5 193.4 193.6 197.7 188.5
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 7:15
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2580 2635 2529 2624
Vehs Exited 2502 2540 2507 2540
Starting Vehs 880 903 894 902
Ending Vehs 958 998 916 985
Travel Distance (mi)5679 5664 5390 5633
Travel Time (hr)242.3 243.4 226.9 243.9
Total Delay (hr)81.4 83.2 74.2 84.2
Total Stops 4478 4676 4375 4755
Fuel Used (gal) 194.4 194.2 183.9 193.3
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2375 2315 2347 2422 2364 2524 2390
Vehs Exited 2553 2455 2435 2518 2386 2568 2507
Starting Vehs 1024 1026 987 1017 935 1051 1012
Ending Vehs 846 886 899 921 913 1007 895
Travel Distance (mi)5440 5382 5241 5454 5253 5688 5569
Travel Time (hr)235.2 233.0 223.1 233.7 230.8 256.6 242.6
Total Delay (hr)80.7 80.8 74.4 78.2 82.2 95.3 85.5
Total Stops 4375 4542 4393 4541 4587 5193 4711
Fuel Used (gal) 185.2 184.9 180.1 185.6 181.1 198.7 191.4
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 7:30
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2325 2354 2429 0
Vehs Exited 2412 2479 2500 0
Starting Vehs 958 998 916 0
Ending Vehs 871 873 845 0
Travel Distance (mi)5291 5471 5340 0
Travel Time (hr)222.7 234.9 230.5 0.0
Total Delay (hr)72.6 79.9 78.5 0.0
Total Stops 4344 4454 4455 0
Fuel Used (gal) 178.8 187.2 183.1 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2443 2427 2424 2450 2364 2492 2334
Vehs Exited 2395 2452 2451 2416 2393 2574 2369
Starting Vehs 846 886 899 921 913 1007 895
Ending Vehs 894 861 872 955 884 925 860
Travel Distance (mi)5218 5327 5456 5274 5307 5691 5309
Travel Time (hr)219.8 223.6 227.4 226.9 225.7 246.5 222.5
Total Delay (hr)70.7 72.2 72.6 76.8 75.1 85.3 72.6
Total Stops 4194 4212 4191 4535 4407 4737 4152
Fuel Used (gal) 176.8 180.9 183.0 179.1 181.4 195.7 179.7
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 7:45
End Time 8:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2393 2330 2307 0
Vehs Exited 2404 2392 2284 0
Starting Vehs 871 873 845 0
Ending Vehs 860 811 868 0
Travel Distance (mi)5422 5131 5142 0
Travel Time (hr)229.0 212.0 212.0 0.0
Total Delay (hr)74.7 65.8 66.5 0.0
Total Stops 4259 4038 3972 0
Fuel Used (gal) 184.9 170.9 173.7 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2439 2512 2410 2458 2418 2375 2412
Vehs Exited 2376 2418 2405 2453 2422 2411 2385
Starting Vehs 894 861 872 955 884 925 860
Ending Vehs 957 955 877 960 880 889 887
Travel Distance (mi)5253 5525 5369 5566 5236 5315 5368
Travel Time (hr)234.0 239.0 232.4 238.5 216.5 236.3 225.1
Total Delay (hr)84.4 81.8 80.0 81.4 67.4 84.8 72.5
Total Stops 5007 4664 4736 4488 4042 4567 4234
Fuel Used (gal) 181.5 188.8 182.9 191.7 175.7 183.2 181.4
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 8:00
End Time 8:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2408 2410 2468 0
Vehs Exited 2403 2348 2401 0
Starting Vehs 860 811 868 0
Ending Vehs 865 873 935 0
Travel Distance (mi)5265 5161 5334 0
Travel Time (hr)220.8 218.3 226.2 0.0
Total Delay (hr)71.7 71.0 75.7 0.0
Total Stops 4201 4268 4515 0
Fuel Used (gal) 178.5 174.0 182.7 0.0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B25 B25 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 340 328 343 19 170 549 551 314 78 101 58 63
Average Queue (ft) 153 96 114 1 23 316 325 31 9 10 15 14
95th Queue (ft)283 238 250 10 100 566 574 204 63 75 45 43
Link Distance (ft)2253 2253 507 507 1298 1298 740 740
Upstream Blk Time (%)4 4
Queuing Penalty (veh)34 35
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 25 9 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 3 4 1
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft)89 185 153
Average Queue (ft)21 88 41
95th Queue (ft)63 157 115
Link Distance (ft)1155 1155
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB B25 WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R T L T T R LT LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 148 245 240 4 2 33 459 477 176 25 184 163
Average Queue (ft) 61 63 69 0 0 1 157 155 28 2 84 86
95th Queue (ft)125 166 165 3 2 26 357 366 130 14 158 153
Link Distance (ft)1298 1298 507 754 754 832 173
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 310 232 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 2 4 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0 4 1 2 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 19: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 282 269 108 55 80 197 206 64 96 37
Average Queue (ft) 74 73 14 16 40 68 68 12 42 6
95th Queue (ft)187 183 74 46 75 158 165 40 85 23
Link Distance (ft)754 754 5103 5103 996 996
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 28: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)36 102 69
Average Queue (ft)2 23 33
95th Queue (ft)16 69 57
Link Distance (ft)7 173 182
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 AM Buildout
Alt 4 AM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke City & County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 29: W Ruritan Rd & Site
Movement SE SW
Directions Served LT LR
Maximum Queue (ft)45 30
Average Queue (ft)2 6
95th Queue (ft)29 25
Link Distance (ft)1405 84
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11285 11392 11444 11241 11198 11338 11450
Vehs Exited 11235 11295 11420 11217 11164 11427 11454
Starting Vehs 1086 1037 1129 1086 1034 1096 1078
Ending Vehs 1136 1134 1153 1110 1068 1007 1074
Travel Distance (mi) 23800 24056 24276 23823 23279 23886 24011
Travel Time (hr)1108.9 1137.7 1193.2 1117.2 1054.9 1123.2 1113.4
Total Delay (hr)424.4 446.4 495.9 432.4 385.1 436.1 423.8
Total Stops 22223 23279 25195 22500 20794 22657 22049
Fuel Used (gal)837.8 852.0 870.5 845.8 812.3 844.0 843.2
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11374 11275 11258 11319
Vehs Exited 11455 11159 11275 11309
Starting Vehs 1107 995 1079 1071
Ending Vehs 1026 1111 1062 1080
Travel Distance (mi) 24050 23662 23814 23866
Travel Time (hr)1123.3 1122.1 1143.4 1123.7
Total Delay (hr)431.4 441.5 458.5 437.6
Total Stops 22844 22664 23569 22772
Fuel Used (gal)847.9 839.0 850.1 844.3
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:15
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2919 3030 3064 3014 2924 3107 3073
Vehs Exited 2834 2891 2944 2910 2872 2933 2927
Starting Vehs 1086 1037 1129 1086 1034 1096 1078
Ending Vehs 1171 1176 1249 1190 1086 1270 1224
Travel Distance (mi) 5945 6135 6309 6188 5956 6224 6238
Travel Time (hr)280.2 280.0 304.9 294.4 270.6 294.6 283.2
Total Delay (hr)108.2 103.0 124.0 116.3 98.6 116.0 104.7
Total Stops 5854 5476 6310 6119 5261 5967 5581
Fuel Used (gal) 208.6 214.9 227.1 219.3 208.7 219.4 216.2
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 3056 3047 3036 3018
Vehs Exited 2917 2808 2942 2896
Starting Vehs 1107 995 1079 1071
Ending Vehs 1246 1234 1173 1196
Travel Distance (mi) 6270 6056 6110 6143
Travel Time (hr)300.5 282.9 290.1 288.1
Total Delay (hr)120.5 108.5 114.3 111.4
Total Stops 6241 5726 5991 5850
Fuel Used (gal) 221.9 213.3 217.5 216.7
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2856 2852 2708 2752 2691 2807 2838
Vehs Exited 2908 2827 2847 2868 2795 2980 2891
Starting Vehs 1171 1176 1249 1190 1086 1270 1224
Ending Vehs 1119 1201 1110 1074 982 1097 1171
Travel Distance (mi) 6084 6005 5932 5831 5754 6125 6055
Travel Time (hr)280.2 292.0 289.3 279.2 257.2 296.6 288.4
Total Delay (hr)105.7 119.5 118.6 110.9 92.2 120.7 114.5
Total Stops 5557 6211 5901 5576 4928 6111 5770
Fuel Used (gal) 213.1 214.1 211.9 208.1 200.2 220.7 215.6
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2826 2690 2714 2770
Vehs Exited 2959 2837 2775 2869
Starting Vehs 1246 1234 1173 1196
Ending Vehs 1113 1087 1112 1099
Travel Distance (mi) 5988 5804 5895 5947
Travel Time (hr)285.3 274.1 287.6 283.0
Total Delay (hr)112.6 106.8 117.7 111.9
Total Stops 5964 5515 5967 5751
Fuel Used (gal) 213.4 205.6 210.6 211.3
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2732 2712 2840 2669 2732 2746 2753
Vehs Exited 2730 2785 2793 2716 2649 2756 2873
Starting Vehs 1119 1201 1110 1074 982 1097 1171
Ending Vehs 1121 1128 1157 1027 1065 1087 1051
Travel Distance (mi) 5869 5927 5992 5928 5533 5867 5815
Travel Time (hr)265.6 280.9 298.4 271.3 247.3 266.3 267.9
Total Delay (hr)96.8 110.6 126.2 101.9 87.7 97.7 100.1
Total Stops 5098 5806 6539 5324 4882 5169 5314
Fuel Used (gal) 205.6 210.3 214.7 210.1 191.2 205.5 203.7
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2760 2785 2734 2741
Vehs Exited 2797 2705 2720 2751
Starting Vehs 1113 1087 1112 1099
Ending Vehs 1076 1167 1126 1091
Travel Distance (mi) 5996 5902 5882 5871
Travel Time (hr)274.9 281.5 288.9 274.3
Total Delay (hr)101.9 111.9 119.4 105.4
Total Stops 5488 5702 6084 5542
Fuel Used (gal) 210.3 209.9 211.7 207.3
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2778 2798 2832 2806 2851 2678 2786
Vehs Exited 2763 2792 2836 2723 2848 2758 2763
Starting Vehs 1121 1128 1157 1027 1065 1087 1051
Ending Vehs 1136 1134 1153 1110 1068 1007 1074
Travel Distance (mi) 5902 5988 6043 5876 6036 5670 5904
Travel Time (hr)282.9 284.8 300.5 272.3 279.7 265.7 273.9
Total Delay (hr)113.7 113.2 127.1 103.3 106.6 101.7 104.5
Total Stops 5714 5786 6445 5481 5723 5410 5384
Fuel Used (gal) 210.6 212.7 216.9 208.3 212.3 198.4 207.7
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2732 2753 2774 2776
Vehs Exited 2782 2809 2838 2795
Starting Vehs 1076 1167 1126 1091
Ending Vehs 1026 1111 1062 1080
Travel Distance (mi) 5797 5900 5928 5904
Travel Time (hr)262.6 283.7 276.8 278.3
Total Delay (hr)96.3 114.3 107.0 108.8
Total Stops 5151 5721 5527 5633
Fuel Used (gal) 202.3 210.3 210.3 209.0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B26 B26 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 251 466 467 20 170 568 583 274 25 33 111 89
Average Queue (ft) 75 187 204 2 45 302 309 13 1 1 42 32
95th Queue (ft)165 362 376 12 124 566 574 126 16 20 89 67
Link Distance (ft)2282 2282 551 551 1278 1278 496 496
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)5 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 22 8 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 9 2 0
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 173 249 227
Average Queue (ft) 64 164 126
95th Queue (ft)132 235 219
Link Distance (ft)1078 1078
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 251 323 341 184 161 678 688 232 76 61 172 162
Average Queue (ft) 105 118 138 14 17 294 306 78 23 15 78 42
95th Queue (ft)201 248 269 86 88 596 618 231 59 41 142 101
Link Distance (ft)1278 1278 749 749 624 174
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 2 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 310 232 106 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1 0 0 1 22 2 0 0 1 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served U T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft)30 310 320 139 120 137 215 235 118 143 69
Average Queue (ft)2 99 99 26 57 73 60 58 42 75 17
95th Queue (ft)20 227 230 78 105 119 153 159 98 131 46
Link Distance (ft)749 749 5095 5095 1123 1123
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 172 330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2019 PM Exist
Alt 4 PM - with updated volumes 08/01/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)17 108 70
Average Queue (ft)1 19 34
95th Queue (ft)8 67 57
Link Distance (ft) 1462 174 181
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11312 11424 11349 11427 11324 11376 11462
Vehs Exited 11259 11385 11364 11485 11254 11379 11442
Starting Vehs 1014 1061 1076 1113 1038 1114 1114
Ending Vehs 1067 1100 1061 1055 1108 1111 1134
Travel Distance (mi) 24158 24115 23981 24153 23694 24238 24269
Travel Time (hr)1162.0 1128.3 1115.5 1146.1 1105.9 1139.9 1161.6
Total Delay (hr)468.8 435.7 426.5 452.7 424.1 445.5 464.0
Total Stops 24430 22869 22586 23617 22437 23219 24154
Fuel Used (gal)858.8 854.3 843.8 860.2 837.5 860.6 863.4
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11431 11311 11366 11373
Vehs Exited 11414 11371 11367 11372
Starting Vehs 1076 1086 1078 1079
Ending Vehs 1093 1026 1077 1081
Travel Distance (mi) 23649 24094 24004 24035
Travel Time (hr)1122.9 1120.6 1148.1 1135.1
Total Delay (hr)440.9 427.9 457.5 444.4
Total Stops 22887 22815 23882 23285
Fuel Used (gal)837.2 846.7 853.1 851.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:15
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information RecordinRecording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 3003 3121 3042 3126 3047 2982 2998
Vehs Exited 2843 2882 2912 2910 2933 2872 2916
Starting Vehs 1014 1061 1076 1113 1038 1114 1114
Ending Vehs 1174 1300 1206 1329 1152 1224 1196
Travel Distance (mi) 6092 6191 6144 6310 6133 6142 6169
Travel Time (hr)290.8 292.9 290.2 305.8 281.3 300.1 285.6
Total Delay (hr)116.3 114.6 113.4 124.7 104.8 123.8 108.5
Total Stops 5962 6134 5984 6486 5724 6369 5674
Fuel Used (gal) 217.0 221.4 218.1 226.2 215.5 220.6 218.4
Interval #1 Information RecordinRecording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 3078 3075 3018 3045
Vehs Exited 2933 2943 2852 2901
Starting Vehs 1076 1086 1078 1079
Ending Vehs 1221 1218 1244 1220
Travel Distance (mi) 6112 6321 6064 6168
Travel Time (hr)286.5 299.5 296.7 292.9
Total Delay (hr)110.6 118.2 122.6 115.7
Total Stops 5854 6257 6561 6102
Fuel Used (gal) 215.9 224.8 216.3 219.4
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2848 2779 2725 2778 2742 2796 2827
Vehs Exited 2875 2951 2850 2978 2841 2928 2847
Starting Vehs 1174 1300 1206 1329 1152 1224 1196
Ending Vehs 1147 1128 1081 1129 1053 1092 1176
Travel Distance (mi) 6100 6119 5953 6165 5885 6183 6053
Travel Time (hr)293.9 293.5 276.0 298.2 274.4 290.7 290.0
Total Delay (hr)119.0 117.7 105.1 120.8 105.0 113.9 116.3
Total Stops 6256 5938 5565 6095 5596 5989 6075
Fuel Used (gal) 214.3 219.9 209.1 220.2 208.4 220.0 214.2
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2761 2785 2765 2780
Vehs Exited 2879 2913 2914 2899
Starting Vehs 1221 1218 1244 1220
Ending Vehs 1103 1090 1095 1101
Travel Distance (mi) 5859 6020 6114 6045
Travel Time (hr)286.0 283.9 296.2 288.3
Total Delay (hr)116.8 110.8 120.4 114.6
Total Stops 6039 5804 6242 5959
Fuel Used (gal) 210.9 212.0 218.7 214.8
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2770 2733 2795 2706 2771 2764 2801
Vehs Exited 2744 2756 2707 2799 2729 2796 2838
Starting Vehs 1147 1128 1081 1129 1053 1092 1176
Ending Vehs 1173 1105 1169 1036 1095 1060 1139
Travel Distance (mi) 6041 5984 5895 5864 5735 5995 6048
Travel Time (hr)295.8 275.8 270.7 273.3 268.9 275.1 296.4
Total Delay (hr)122.3 104.3 101.4 105.2 103.5 103.7 122.4
Total Stops 6401 5536 5393 5631 5383 5405 6243
Fuel Used (gal) 216.7 210.2 206.7 208.4 202.7 210.4 218.0
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2782 2767 2789 2769
Vehs Exited 2812 2731 2816 2773
Starting Vehs 1103 1090 1095 1101
Ending Vehs 1073 1126 1068 1098
Travel Distance (mi) 5841 5898 5977 5928
Travel Time (hr)282.2 270.5 278.0 278.7
Total Delay (hr)113.5 100.8 106.1 108.3
Total Stops 5670 5521 5491 5667
Fuel Used (gal) 206.2 205.3 210.1 209.5
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2691 2791 2787 2817 2764 2834 2836
Vehs Exited 2797 2796 2895 2798 2751 2783 2841
Starting Vehs 1173 1105 1169 1036 1095 1060 1139
Ending Vehs 1067 1100 1061 1055 1108 1111 1134
Travel Distance (mi) 5926 5821 5988 5814 5941 5918 6000
Travel Time (hr)281.4 266.1 278.6 268.9 281.3 274.1 289.7
Total Delay (hr)111.3 99.1 106.6 102.0 110.8 104.1 116.8
Total Stops 5811 5261 5644 5405 5734 5456 6162
Fuel Used (gal) 210.8 202.8 210.0 205.5 210.8 209.6 212.7
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2810 2684 2794 2780
Vehs Exited 2790 2784 2785 2800
Starting Vehs 1073 1126 1068 1098
Ending Vehs 1093 1026 1077 1081
Travel Distance (mi) 5838 5855 5849 5895
Travel Time (hr)268.2 266.7 277.2 275.2
Total Delay (hr)100.0 98.1 108.4 105.7
Total Stops 5324 5233 5588 5568
Fuel Used (gal) 204.3 204.5 207.9 207.9
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B26 B26 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 219 536 525 18 171 572 580 274 30 32 105 102
Average Queue (ft) 74 200 216 2 47 313 320 8 1 1 43 32
95th Queue (ft)157 374 380 11 125 589 598 102 19 20 89 73
Link Distance (ft)2282 2282 551 551 1278 1278 496 496
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)7 8
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 22 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 9 2 0
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 274 235
Average Queue (ft) 68 170 127
95th Queue (ft)137 243 224
Link Distance (ft)1078 1078
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 241 324 334 182 207 717 723 232 90 68 163 133
Average Queue (ft) 101 120 137 14 17 320 327 78 25 16 79 44
95th Queue (ft)190 249 271 83 88 624 639 224 65 43 142 99
Link Distance (ft)1278 1278 749 749 624 174
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 1 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 310 232 106 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 2 0 0 15 21 0 0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 1 0 0 2 25 2 0 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served U T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft)14 322 321 157 124 136 221 226 134 158 66
Average Queue (ft)1 100 102 29 62 79 74 65 47 79 17
95th Queue (ft)9 232 234 106 112 126 177 174 105 135 45
Link Distance (ft) 749 749 5095 5095 1123 1123
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 172 330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Background
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)7 104 71
Average Queue (ft) 0 16 35
95th Queue (ft)8 61 59
Link Distance (ft) 1462 174 181
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11397 11493 11240 11325 11582 11416 11488
Vehs Exited 11452 11330 11161 11370 11448 11496 11476
Starting Vehs 1056 1059 1025 1097 976 1099 1094
Ending Vehs 1001 1222 1104 1052 1110 1019 1106
Travel Distance (mi) 24360 24135 23408 23635 23862 24026 24190
Travel Time (hr)1148.6 1147.3 1080.3 1096.7 1134.0 1122.5 1127.4
Total Delay (hr)448.5 453.3 406.9 416.5 448.0 431.3 433.3
Total Stops 23340 23501 21357 22025 23557 22589 23061
Fuel Used (gal)865.9 855.4 822.4 831.3 845.6 848.3 856.1
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Start Time 4:15 4:15 4:15 4:15
End Time 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30
Total Time (min)75 75 75 75
Time Recorded (min)60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 5 5 5 5
# of Recorded Intervals 4 4 4 4
Vehs Entered 11295 11278 11461 11398
Vehs Exited 11281 11243 11425 11367
Starting Vehs 1097 1082 1015 1057
Ending Vehs 1111 1117 1051 1085
Travel Distance (mi) 23936 23879 24095 23953
Travel Time (hr)1116.2 1147.7 1132.8 1125.4
Total Delay (hr)430.1 461.4 441.3 437.0
Total Stops 22625 24025 23266 22936
Fuel Used (gal)843.6 849.2 852.5 847.0
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:15
End Time 4:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 2
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 3072 3030 2991 3102 3139 3026 3091
Vehs Exited 2913 2859 2904 2970 2901 2931 2957
Starting Vehs 1056 1059 1025 1097 976 1099 1094
Ending Vehs 1215 1230 1112 1229 1214 1194 1228
Travel Distance (mi) 6280 6089 6060 6165 6201 6262 6226
Travel Time (hr)301.5 292.0 277.6 298.5 293.8 288.3 294.1
Total Delay (hr)120.9 116.7 103.6 120.7 115.7 108.8 115.2
Total Stops 6311 6111 5475 6238 6086 5669 6094
Fuel Used (gal) 224.3 217.2 212.8 219.6 220.3 220.2 221.4
Interval #1 Information Recording1
Start Time 4:30
End Time 4:45
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2990 3116 3076 0
Vehs Exited 2935 2952 2921 0
Starting Vehs 1097 1082 1015 0
Ending Vehs 1152 1246 1170 0
Travel Distance (mi) 6181 6257 6145 0
Travel Time (hr)294.2 301.1 287.9 0.0
Total Delay (hr)116.9 120.8 111.2 0.0
Total Stops 6089 6393 5901 0
Fuel Used (gal) 220.6 222.6 217.7 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 3
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2855 2775 2721 2708 2812 2841 2819
Vehs Exited 2918 2920 2744 2901 2899 2903 2934
Starting Vehs 1215 1230 1112 1229 1214 1194 1228
Ending Vehs 1152 1085 1089 1036 1127 1132 1113
Travel Distance (mi) 6153 5996 5808 5916 5982 6104 6034
Travel Time (hr)292.8 282.8 268.2 278.1 285.1 289.1 285.3
Total Delay (hr)116.3 110.5 101.5 107.7 113.2 113.9 112.0
Total Stops 5967 5604 5296 5595 5871 5903 5826
Fuel Used (gal) 219.4 212.9 204.5 208.2 212.4 217.4 215.1
Interval #2 Information Recording2
Start Time 4:45
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2710 2757 2807 0
Vehs Exited 2847 2860 2912 0
Starting Vehs 1152 1246 1170 0
Ending Vehs 1015 1143 1065 0
Travel Distance (mi) 5908 5951 6031 0
Travel Time (hr)268.6 291.7 284.1 0.0
Total Delay (hr)99.9 120.9 110.3 0.0
Total Stops 5232 6355 5854 0
Fuel Used (gal) 206.4 213.4 213.8 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 4
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2699 2858 2739 2729 2827 2840 2786
Vehs Exited 2749 2764 2740 2732 2803 2879 2797
Starting Vehs 1152 1085 1089 1036 1127 1132 1113
Ending Vehs 1102 1179 1088 1033 1151 1093 1102
Travel Distance (mi) 6054 5953 5833 5760 5798 5928 6022
Travel Time (hr)284.7 278.1 270.2 259.0 272.7 277.3 276.0
Total Delay (hr)111.2 106.6 102.0 93.4 105.9 106.6 104.0
Total Stops 5746 5659 5458 5087 5663 5617 5609
Fuel Used (gal) 215.5 209.2 204.9 201.2 203.7 209.6 211.5
Interval #3 Information Recording3
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:15
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2763 2639 2796 0
Vehs Exited 2667 2642 2755 0
Starting Vehs 1015 1143 1065 0
Ending Vehs 1111 1140 1106 0
Travel Distance (mi) 5827 5750 5950 0
Travel Time (hr)265.5 275.8 277.2 0.0
Total Delay (hr)98.2 110.8 107.1 0.0
Total Stops 5292 5666 5649 0
Fuel Used (gal) 203.1 204.9 209.0 0.0
SimTraffic Simulation Summary 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 5
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 1 10 2 3 4 5 6
Vehs Entered 2771 2830 2789 2786 2804 2709 2792
Vehs Exited 2872 2787 2773 2767 2845 2783 2788
Starting Vehs 1102 1179 1088 1033 1151 1093 1102
Ending Vehs 1001 1222 1104 1052 1110 1019 1106
Travel Distance (mi) 5873 6096 5707 5794 5881 5731 5909
Travel Time (hr)269.5 294.5 264.3 261.0 282.4 267.8 271.9
Total Delay (hr)100.1 119.5 99.7 94.7 113.2 101.9 102.1
Total Stops 5316 6127 5128 5105 5937 5400 5532
Fuel Used (gal) 206.6 216.2 200.2 202.3 209.2 201.1 208.1
Interval #4 Information Recording4
Start Time 5:15
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min)15
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF.
Run Number 7 8 9 Avg
Vehs Entered 2832 2766 2782 0
Vehs Exited 2832 2789 2837 0
Starting Vehs 1111 1140 1106 0
Ending Vehs 1111 1117 1051 0
Travel Distance (mi) 6020 5921 5969 0
Travel Time (hr)287.9 279.1 283.6 0.0
Total Delay (hr)115.0 108.8 112.6 0.0
Total Stops 6012 5611 5862 0
Fuel Used (gal) 213.5 208.3 212.0 0.0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B26 B26 NB NB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R T T LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 285 497 508 16 170 570 574 195 47 51 109 80
Average Queue (ft) 74 192 207 3 44 296 302 8 3 3 46 30
95th Queue (ft)181 372 380 12 120 561 562 101 38 46 95 66
Link Distance (ft)2282 2282 551 551 1278 1278 496 496
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)4 4
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 405 612 172 392
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 0 21 8 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 0 8 2 0
Intersection: 55: Mexico Way NE/Blue Hills Dr NE & Route 460
Movement SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 164 252 219
Average Queue (ft) 66 163 122
95th Queue (ft)132 228 211
Link Distance (ft)1078 1078
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)410
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 1: CVS Entrance/W Ruritan Rd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 238 399 408 182 148 650 677 232 91 68 174 158
Average Queue (ft) 105 128 147 18 14 295 308 82 26 15 88 48
95th Queue (ft)196 296 317 104 77 580 603 234 69 44 155 107
Link Distance (ft)1278 1278 749 749 624 174
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 415 248 310 232 106 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1 0 0 1 22 2 0 0 2 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 20: Valley Gateway Blvd & Route 460
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served U T T R L L T T L L R
Maximum Queue (ft)14 338 330 176 138 151 221 231 129 146 74
Average Queue (ft)1 107 104 29 63 79 64 62 44 72 16
95th Queue (ft)8 249 246 110 115 129 163 164 99 129 47
Link Distance (ft) 749 749 5095 5095 1123 1123
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 172 330 525 525 250
Storage Blk Time (%)3 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 29: Chick-fil-A & W Ruritan Rd
Movement SE NW NE
Directions Served TR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)31 83 77
Average Queue (ft)2 11 33
95th Queue (ft)16 46 60
Link Distance (ft)7 174 181
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report 2020 PM Buildout
Alt 4 PM - updated volumes 07/29/2019
Route 460 - Roanoke County SimTraffic Report
vtwh Page 6
Intersection: 16: W Ruritan Rd & Site
Movement SE SW
Directions Served LT LR
Maximum Queue (ft)22 37
Average Queue (ft)1 17
95th Queue (ft)16 42
Link Distance (ft)1405 84
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
APPENDIX F
202, 150
97, 268
NB 2020 Buildout AM Peak Hour
NB 2020 Buildout PM Peak Hour
268, 10
150, 21
NB 2020 Buildout AM Peak Hour
NB 2020 Buildout PM Peak Hour
F-100
It is important to note that the Table 2-2 entrance and intersection spacing standards are
measured from the centerlines of the intersection and the entrance rather than edge of
pavement. As a result, the Table 2-2 spacing measurement may result in a distance that
is less than the corner clearance. The corner clearance distance will apply where it is
greater than the Table 2-2 spacing standard to protect intersection operation.
Similar to the placement of an entrance on the main roadway, conflicts for the existing
vehicles for the side street entrance must be considered. Figure 4-5 illustrates the
concept of corner clearance.
For the right turn out of the side street entrance (flow A), the vehicle approaching from
the left (flow C) must be considered. The greater the radius (R) for right turning vehicles
from the main roadway, the faster they will be approaching the side street entrance.
For the driver exiting the side street entrance to go left (flow B) or right (Flow F) or to
enter the opposite entrance (Flow E), the length of the queue at the main intersection
must be considered to assure there is enough room that the entrance will not be
blocked by queue D.
The downstream corner clearance is 225’ minimum*, which equals the intersection
sight distance for 20 mph (see Table 2-5). Additional length will be required as directed by
the Engineer at the Residency or District.
The minimum upstream corner clearance is the greater of 225’ + W or the queue D.
FIGURE 4-5 CORNER CLEARANCE
* Rev. 7/17
R-1 District Regulations
1
SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose.
(A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the
urban service area with existing low-middle density residential development, with an
average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears
appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the
neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive
plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services
warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan.
This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially
incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or
scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of
existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a
community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district.
This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood
activities.
(Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more
stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific
uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Stable, Private *
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Emergency *
Multiple Dog Permit *
R-1 District Regulations
2
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Attached *
Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) *
Single Family Dwelling, Detached
Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) *
Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) *
3. Civic Uses
Community Recreation *
Family Day Care Home *
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Utility Services, Minor
4. Commercial Uses
Bed and Breakfast *
5. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower *
Wind Energy System, Small *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article
IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Alternative Discharging Sewage System *
2. Civic Uses
Cemetery *
R-1 District Regulations
3
Crisis Center
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major *
3. Commercial Uses
Golf Course *
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings *
(Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2,
8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, §
II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No.
052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord.
No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-41-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet).
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
3. All lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
R-1 District Regulations
4
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind
rear building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the
setback requirements for principal structures.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent
for accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1,
4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
C-1 District Regulations
1
SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-53-1. Purpose.
(A) The purpose of the C-1 low intensity commercial district is to provide for the
development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service
area which serve both community and county-wide needs. The C-1 district allows for
varying intensities of office and commercial development as part of either a planned
office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office and commercial uses. The C-1
districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing
commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been
established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical
buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are
generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land
use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to
ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses.
(Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more
stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific
uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Multi-family Dwelling *
Two-family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
C-1 District Regulations
2
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Guidance Services
Park and Ride Facility *
Post Office
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
3. Office Uses
Financial Institutions *
General Office
Medical Office
4. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services *
Antique Shops
Bed and Breakfast *
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools *
Communications Services
Consumer Repair Services
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
C-1 District Regulations
3
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
5. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower *
Parking Facility *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article
IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Civic Uses
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major *
2. Office Uses
Laboratories
3. Commercial Uses
Automobile Rental/Leasing
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food *
Restaurant, General
Retail Sales
4. Industrial Uses
Landfill, Rubble *
Recycling Centers and Stations *
5. Miscellaneous Uses
Broadcasting Tower *
C-1 District Regulations
4
Outdoor Gatherings *
(Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, § 1, 4-
22-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13, Ord. No. 062816-
4, § 1, 6-28-16)
Sec. 30-53-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).
b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
a. Area: 15,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind
the front building line.
b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line.
2. Side yard: None.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one (1) street, front yard setbacks shall apply to
all streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
C-1 District Regulations
5
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, forty-five
(45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height
may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the
R-1 or R-2 district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over
forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless
otherwise restricted by this ordinance.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11)
NORTH
W
Ruritan Rd
Challenger Ave NE
Challenger Ave NE
2014 - (141695210) (O)
2015 - (150505154) (C)
2014 - (141895113) (O)
2014 - (142035148) (O)
2014 - (142195204) (O)
2014 - (142605089) (C)
2014 - (142965237) (C)
2014 - (143225107) (O)
2014 - (143495406) (O)
2015 - (150645075) (O)
2015 - (150645109) (O)
2015 - (151275224) (O)
2015 - (152025125) (O)
2015 - (152305134) (O)
2015 - (152225116) (O)
2015 - (152645311) (O)
2015 - (152455180) (O)
2015 - (153355375) (O)
2015 - (160065179) (O)
2016 - (160195249) (O)
2014 - (143645195) (O)
2016 - (160305058) (B)
2016 - (160545362) (O)
2016 - (161035058) (O)
2016 - (161445298) (B)
2016 - (161665132) (O)
2016 - (161795282) (C)
2016 - (162045221) (C)
2016 - (162255086) (O)
2016 - (162155136) (C)
2016 - (162245217) (O)
2016 - (162385133) (C)
2016 - (162435142) (O)
2016 - (162575206) (O)
2016 - (162925459) (O)
2016 - (163285079) (C)
2016 - (163005351) (O)
2016 - (163165153) (B)
2016 - (163205269) (O)
2016 - (163335277) (O)
2016 - (163555278) (O)
2016 - (163565323) (O)
2016 - (163645164) (O)
2017 - (170095197) (O)
2017 - (170095198) (O)
2017 - (170255129) (C)
2016 - (162785187) (O)
2017 - (170655136) (O)
2017 - (170585105) (O)
2017 - (170875195) (O)
2017 - (170945169) (B)
2017 - (171235193) (O)
2017 - (171515235) (O)
2017 - (171325126) (B)
2017 - (172275149) (O)
2017 - (172025227) (O)
2017 - (172895342) (O)
2017 - (172865330) (C)
2017 - (173035389) (A)
2017 - (173105343) (C)
2017 - (180185427) (O)
2018 - (180195253) (O)
2018 - (180195143) (O)
2018 - (180305137) (C)
2018 - (180755140) (O)
2018 - (181575145) (O)
2018 - (180805270) (C)
2018 - (180735193) (C)
2018 - (180735192) (C)
2018 - (180795172) (C)
2018 - (181135238) (O)
2018 - (181135271) (A)
2018 - (181095225) (C)
2018 - (181365146) (O)
2018 - (182065134) (C)
2018 - (182325334) (O)
2018 - (182505187) (O)
2018 - (182485171) (O)
2018 - (182995277) (O)
2018 - (183615154) (O)
2018 - (183625116) (C)
2018 - (190315211) (O)
2019 - (190165197) (O)
2019 - (190225358) (O)
2019 - (190565213) (B)
2019 - (190675141) (O)
2019 - (190795148) (A)
2019 - (190935097) (A)
2019 - (190925211) (C)
2019 - (191565138) (C)
2017 - (170185221) (O)
460
460
610
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
Left Turn Crash
Right Turn Crash
Left Side Swipe Crash
Right Side Swipe Crash
Rear End Crash
Angle Crash
LEGEND
#
Head On Crash
Backed Into Crash
Collision With Parked Car
Collision With Pedestrian
Collision With Bicycle
Fixed Object
#
#
#
#
#
Run Off The Road Crash
Other
Indication of Fault
Indication of Non Fault
Animal Crash
#Number of Crashes
#Fatality Crash
#
#
YEAR - (FR-300) (KABCO) NCD = No Crash Diagram
22
19
5
1
3
1
14
1
4
5
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
Description Date Period Figure
09-17-2019 06-01-14 to 05-31-19
Collision Diagram
Operation Center(SWRO)
South Western Regional
Salem, VA 24153
1596 Deborah Lane
ROANOKE COUNTY
Routes 460 (Challenger Avenue NE)
and 610 (W Ruritan Road)
Ron W. Roop
1431 West Ruritan Rd.
Roanoke, VA 24012
July 1, 2019
Certificate of Mailing
Brian Simmons, Roanoke County Fire Marshal
5925 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Subject: Blasting near the vicinity of my property
Dear Fire Marshal Simmons,
As you are aware there is a formation of shale that runs from the east of Valley Gateway Plaza (i.e.
Kroger off of Challenger Ave.) to my home at 1431 West Ruritan Rd. When West Ruritan Rd. was
lowered considerably in the 1980’s, it effectively created a ground level terminal-end for the shale
formation at the southwest corner of my house. Not good considering the following:
Back in 2008 when the contractor was b lasting during the Plaza excavation, the blasts shook my
house and caused cracks in the garage ceiling and several pieces of stucco to become dislodged
from the house foundation above the basement stairwell door. I called Virginia Blasting and they
wouldn’t repair the damage unless I permitt ed them to subsequently install a seismic recorder for what
they said were “legal purposes” since they alleged “the 12/20 blast was well under the reg’s.” Since
this would be subsequent to the blast that caused the damage, I cited the following example : Take a
2 x 4 x 18” long and lay it on the ground. Put a n 8 oz. cup of water on one end of the board and strike
the other end hard with a hammer. Right much of an effect don’t you think? Now set the 8 oz. cup
holding the same amount of water on the board and strike the other end with a feather duster –
virtually no effect. The point is, you can make the seismic reading anything you want by: the amount
of charge you put in the hole; by drilling the hole through the bed rock into mud or a softer layer;
drilling and blasting in another location; or any number of ways to “cheat the test”. Since a test
subsequent to the one causing the damage could be manipulated to provide whatever results they
desired, I wouldn’t agree to any result they came up with, and they didn’t repair the damage.
Essentially the same scenario occurred in 2017 when Lidl Grocery was developing an adjacent
property, except closer to my home. This produced ceiling cracks in the den ceil ing, in a bedroom
ceiling, stucco dislodgment from the front porch, cracks in the concrete deck of the swimming pool
and pieces of concrete falling from the edges of the pool deck . After several calls to the blasting
company by me that were unreturned, Deputy Tim Webster had the blasting company call me to
make an appointment to meet me, but they never called back to set a firm date - - frustrating.
It’s our understanding a commercial enterprise is planning on developing the property (next to me) on
the corner of Challenger Ave. and West Ruritan Rd. (across West Ruritan from Chick –fil-A).
We respectfully request you to deny any permit involving any degree of blasting for that project and
any plans they have for excavation equipment of such size and configuration that would cause any
ground vibrations to be transmitted to our property.
Sincerely,
Ron W. Roop
Ron W. Roop
1431 West Ruritan Rd.
Roanoke, VA 24012
September 09, 2019
Hand Delivered
Brian Simmons, Roanoke County Fire Marshal
5925 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Subject: Update - Blasting adjacent to our home
References: 1) Land use application & rezoning petition filed by Lewis Gale Medical Center
(copy attached)
2) My July 1, 2019 letter to you (copy attached)
Dear Fire Marshal Simmons,
On September 7th we received a notice of a community meeting scheduled for September 16th concerning a
rezoning petition and land use application as referenced above.
The notice also states the petition is scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on
Tuesday, October 1, 2019, then a public hearing before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday October 22,
2019.
For years, the County proffered that there would be a “buffer zone” between commercial development and
existing residential along the corridor. It’s apparent they laid that aside when they approved the Chick-fil-A
development on the corner of West Ruritan Rd. and Challenger Ave.
While we don’t have a problem with the proposed Lewis Gale entity in and of itself, our main concern (as stated
in our July 1st letter to you) is damage to our property during the excavation phase of the development. An
additional concern which your office may or may not have jurisdiction over is the amount of airborne dust and
dirt created during the excavation. For example, neither the excavation contractor on the Chick-fil-A
development or Lidl Grocery development made or used any provision to control airborne dust, and we were
covered with it which created additional vehicle and property maintenance expense on our part.
We would appreciate your office notifying the Planning Commission in advance of their hearing that blasting
will not be permitted and a firm plan must be implemented by all development contractors to control airborne
dust (air pollution). This would allow the Planning Commission to insist on a proffer by the petitioner that
blasting shall not occur under any circumstances, no excavation equipment of such size and configuration shall
be used that would cause any ground vibrations to be transmitted to our property, and methods shall be
employed to control airborne dust. As you can see from our July 1st letter, the mere fact that the
blasting/excavation contractor(s) may have liability insurance is of little consequence when they want to “cheat
the system” (after property damage has been done) to “prove” they were within the “guidelines”.
You and/or your staff are welcome to visit our property and review the shale formation terminal end as
mentioned in our July 1st letter.
Sincerely,
Ron W. Roop
Enclosures: Community Meeting Notice
My letter dated July 1, 2019
Page 1 of 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019
ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.44 ACRES FROM R-1,
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TO C-1, LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT, FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE, FREE-STANDING EMERGENCY
ROOM, LOCATED AT 1423 WEST RURITAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO.
050.05-01-06.00-0000), IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, upon the petition of Lewis Gale Medical Center, as contract purchaser
of the property at issue, to rezone approximately 1.44 acres from R -1 (Low Density
Residential) to C-1 (Low Intensity Commercial) with proffered conditions, located at 1423
West Ruritan Road to develop a medical office, free-standing emergency room, for
medical use; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on October 1, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the petition; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 2019,
and the second reading and public hearing were held on October 22, 2019; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. The Board approves the rezoning requested by petition of Lewis Gale Medical
Center to rezone the parcel located at 1423 West Ruritan Road, Tax Map No.
050.05-01-06.00-0000), IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT from R-1
to C-1 for construction of a 9,410 square foot office building for medical use.
Page 2 of 3
2. The Board accepts the voluntary proffered conditions offered by the petitioner
as:
a. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Lewis-Gale
FSED Rezoning Concept Plan prepared by Crunk Engineering, LLC and
dated August 9, 2019, subject to any changes required by the County of
Roanoke during the site plan review process.
b. The building shall be developed in substantial conformance with the
architectural rendering for the Lewis-Gale Freestanding Emergency Room
filed with the application subject to any changes required by the County of
Roanoke during the building plan review process.
c. The applicant shall have an agreement with a private ambulance company
to provide transportation for patients of the facility who require transfer to a
hospital when the free-standing emergency facility is open to the public
and operating.
d. No blasting will be conducted on the property during the excavation, grading
and preparation of the site and the construction of the building and other
improvements.
3. The Board further finds that the proffered conditions:
a. Have a reasonable relation to the rezoning;
b. Are in conformity with the comprehensive plan;
c. Are clearly understood and enforceable; and
d. Do not require or allow a design or standards that are less restrictive than
are now covered under the County’s current development regulations.
Page 3 of 3
4. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the purpose and
intent of the County’s Comprehensive Plan and good zoning practice, and will
not be a substantial detriment to the community.
5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final
passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map
to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance.