Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/8/2025 - RegularPage 1 of 4 anokeCounty PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: “Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board.” Roanoke County Board of Supervisors July 8, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for July 8, 2025. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 6:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place them on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of Roanoke County’s VDOT Salem District Locality of the Year award. (Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator) D. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance amending Articles I, II, III, IV and V of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) E. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda July 8, 2025 Page 3 of 4 1. Approval of minutes – June 24, 2025 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Stormwater Management Program) of the Roanoke County Code, to incorporate new lot drainage requirements on site plans and plot plans. (Second Reading) 3. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a lease agreement with Ride Source to lease two (2) parking spaces at the General Services Building on Kessler Mill Drive. (Second Reading) 4. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement at 7415 Wood Haven Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for construction of the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project, Hollins Magisterial District. (Second Reading) 5. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $19,184.82 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia for Technology Trust Funds. F. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens, County property owners, and County business owners to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes, Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak. G. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Tammy E. Shepherd 2. Phil C. North 3. Martha B. Hooker 4. Paul M. Mahoney 5. David F. Radford I. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: 1. Section 2.2-3711(A)(1) of the Code of Virginia to conduct the annual performance evaluations of the County Administrator and County Attorney. Page 4 of 4 J. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION K. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 8, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Roanoke County’s VDOT Salem District Locality of the Year award. SUBMITTED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside to recognize Roanoke County's VDOT Salem District Locality of the Year award. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 8, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Articles I, II, III, IV and V of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: First reading of an ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance regarding wireless communication facilities, broadcast towers, accessory apartments, mini-warehouses, temporary portable storage units, solar energy systems, and official zoning map. BACKGROUND: As part of its work plan for 2025, the Planning Commission has an on-going process to review, evaluate, and develop appropriate amendments to the County's Zoning Ordinance. These amendments generally: correct inconsistencies; clarify issues or standards; add or amend definitions and uses; add or amend uses within certain zoning districts; develop or amend standards for existing or new uses; and create or revise development standards dealing with landscaping, parking, signage, lighting, or other development regulations. These amendments are typically developed over several months (usually 6 months) before going through the public hearing and adoption process. This is the first process of two amendment processes proposed for 2025 DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance on July 1, 2025. The proposed amendments would: amend Sec. 30 -1 (Authority and Citation) in Article I (General Provisions); add or amend definitions Page 2 of 2 dealing with broadcast tower, wireless communication facility, and temporary portable storage containers in Sec. 30-28 (Definitions) and Sec. 30-29 (Use Types; Generally) in Article II (Definitions and Use Types); amend Article III (District Regulations) by adding wireless communication facility, Class 1, Class 2, and/or Class 3 as a permitted use and/or as a special use in agricultural zoning districts (AG-3, AG-1, AR, AV), residential zoning districts (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4), commercial zoning districts (C-1, C-2), industrial zoning districts (I-1, I-2), and the EP (Explore Park) zoning district, and amend the site development regulations of the EP zoning district; amend and/or add use and design standards for accessory apartments, mini-warehouse, broadcasting tower, wireless communication facility, class 1, class 2, and class 3, and temporary portable storage containers as a residential accessory use in Article IV (Use and Design Standards); and amend the development standards for ground-mounted and pole-mounted solar energy systems in Sec. 30-100-13 (Solar energy systems) in Article V (Development Standards). No citizens spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission had a general discussion on the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance amendments. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of an ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and schedule the second reading of the ordinance and public hearing for the Board's July 22, 2025, meeting. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 1 ARTICLE I – GENERAL PROVISIONS SEC. 30-1. AUTHORITY AND CITATION. (A) The provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to sections 15.2-2280 and 15.2- 2281, of the Code of Virginia, as amended. This ordinance, and all provisions contained herein, together with the official zoning map, a copy of which is on file in the department of development services, shall be known as the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and may be cited as such, or as the "Zoning Ordinance." The ordinance and official zoning map may be kept in either hardcopy or digital form. ARTICLE II – DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28. DEFINITIONS. (C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section shall have the meanings described below. Above ground level (AGL): When referring to a support structure or tower, the distance measured from ground level at the base of the structure to an object or point on the structure such as an antenna, lightning rod or the top of the structure or tower. Antenna: Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic, radio, or television communications through the sending and/or receiving of electromagnetic waves. Antenna types include, but are not limited to, omni-directional "whip" antenna, directional panel antenna, parabolic antenna and other ancillary antenna designs. An antenna does not include the broadcasting tower or other support structure to which it is attached. Balloon test: A technique utilizing a balloon to demonstrate the height of a proposed support structure or tower. Colocate: To locate with another user on an existing structure such as a tower, power, phone or light pole; water tank or standpipe, building or steeple, billboard sign or similar structure. Micro-wireless facility: A small cell facility that is not larger in dimension than 24 inches in length, 15 inches in width, and 12 inches in height and that has an exterior antenna, if any, not longer than 11 inches. Small cell facility: A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet in volume, or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all of its exposed elements could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the facility has a cumulative volume of not more than 28 cubic feet, or such higher limit as is established by the Federal Communications Commission. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 2 The following types of associated equipment are not included in the calculation of equipment volume: electric meter, concealment, telecommunications demarcation boxes, back-up power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cut-off switches, and vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services. Temporary portable storage containers: A purpose-built, fully enclosed, box-like container with or without signage on one (1) or more of its outer surfaces that is designed for temporary storage of household goods and/or equipment. Such containers are uniquely designed for ease of loading to and from a transport vehicle. SEC. 30-29. USE TYPES; GENERALLY. Sec. 30-29-7. Miscellaneous Use Types. Broadcasting tower: Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one (1) or more antennas on which an antenna or dish is installed for the transmission, broadcasting or receiving of radio, television, radar, or microwaves, and similar types of devices. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common-carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers and wireless communication facilities, which are described separately. Wireless communication facility (WCF): All infrastructure and equipment including, but not limited to, antenna support structures, antennas, transmission cables, equipment shelters, equipment cabinets, utility pedestals, ground equipment, fencing, signage and other ancillary equipment associated with the transmission or reception of wireless communications. Class 1 – Wireless communication facilities with a height less than or equal to eighty (80) feet above ground level (AGL). Class 2 – Wireless communication facilities with a height greater than eighty (80) feet but less than or equal to one hundred twenty (120) feet above ground level (AGL). Class 3 – Wireless communication facilities with a height greater than one hundred twenty (120) feet but less than or equal to one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet above ground level (AGL). ARTICLE III – DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32. AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT. Sec. 30-32-2. Permitted Uses. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 3 (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-33. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT. Sec. 30-33-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-2. Permitted Uses. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 4 (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-36. AV AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT. Sec. 30-36-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 5 (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-42. R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-42-2. Permitted Uses. (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-45. R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-45-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 6 SEC. 30-46. R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-46-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 7 Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-61. I-1 LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-62. I-2 HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 8 Sec. 30-62-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-71. EP EXPLORE PARK DISTRICT. Sec. 30-71-3. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * Sec. 30-71-4. Site Development Regulations. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 9 General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (B) Height. Maximum structure height shall be 45 feet including rooftop mechanical. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (front, side, rear, or buffer) from an exterior property line is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet, up to a maximum height of 125 feet. Zip line towers, and observation towers, and wireless communication facilities shall be exempt from this section. ARTICLE IV – USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-82. RESIDENTIAL USES. Sec. 30-82-1. Accessory Apartments. (C) General standards in the C-1 and C-2 districts, independent of the general standards above: 1. The accessory apartment shall be allowed in conjunction with a civic, office, or commercial, or industrial use type. 2. The civic, office, or commercial, or industrial use type must occupy at least fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area on the site. SEC. 30-85. COMMERCIAL USES. Sec. 30-85-19. Mini-warehouse. (A) General standards: 5. No door openings for any cubicle shall be constructed facing any residentially zoned property. Reserved. SEC. 30-87. MISCELLANEOUS USES. Sec. 30-87-2. Broadcasting Tower. (A) Intent: The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting alternative broadcasting tower sites and DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 10 broadcasting tower designs within the county. In addition, the county staff, planning commission and board of supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the Roanoke County community plan and the general special use permit criteria found in section 30-19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the county to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the county, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the county, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the county, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources. To this end, the county will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the county to encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. To achieve this end, the county encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures. Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the county to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. (A) General standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 11 the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading including any additional equipment necessary from other vendors/providers who collocate on the broadcasting tower. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being used for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 12 shall only be required after notice by the County. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 11. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 12. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. 13. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 14. Any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (21) days shall be permitted. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (B) Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 13 unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (21) days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (CB) Application requirements: 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with county planning staff at least thirty (30) days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible collocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section CB.1. above. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 14 d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. ed. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. fe. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre-application consultation. gf. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by section 30-87-2(DA)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre-application conference. (D) General standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 15 feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre-approved by the board of supervisors. In DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 16 addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the board of supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (EC) General review policies: All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, planning commission and board of supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 17 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. Sec. 30-87-8. Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1, Class 2, Class 3. (A) Intent. The intent of these regulations for wireless communication facilities is: To encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. To encourage the location of wireless communication facilities in non-residential areas and minimize the total number of towers and tower sites throughout the county. To strongly encourage the joint use of new and existing wireless communication facilities, and use of the existing utility transmission rights-of-way To encourage wireless communication facilities to locate in areas where the adverse impact on the surrounding community is minimal. To encourage users of wireless communication facilities to locate, design, and configure them in a way that minimizes their adverse visual impact, and makes them compatible with surrounding land uses, to the extent possible. To strongly encourage the use of monopoles and camouflage/stealth techniques for towers located in or near residential areas. To expand and improve high-speed broadband access and cell phone service availability in unserved and underserved areas; and to explore public-private partnerships to implement Roanoke County’s Rural Broadband Initiative to bring high-speed internet to homes without broadband access. (B) Small cell facility: 1. Permitted by right. A small cell facility installed by a wireless service provider on an existing structure or the installation or construction of a new structure not DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 18 more than 50 feet above ground level containing a small cell facility shall be permitted by right. 2. Colocation. The wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider shall obtain permission from the owner of the existing structure to colocate the small cell facility on the existing structure and to colocate the associated transmission equipment on or proximate to the existing structure. 3. Permit Requests. A wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider may submit up to 35 permit requests for small cell facilities on a single application. 4. Review process. The review process and approval or disapproval of an application for small cell facilities shall be in accordance with Sec. 15.2-2316.4 of the Code of Virginia. 5. Other facilities. Facilities that do not meet the criteria to be deemed a small cell facility are subject to the regulations for wireless communication facility. (C) General Standards for wireless communication facilities: 1. Height. The maximum height of any proposed wireless communication facility and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any wireless communication facility and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest wireless communication facility and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. Facility setbacks. The setback for any proposed wireless communication facility shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the wireless communication facility to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the wireless communication facility. 3. Building/structure setbacks. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a wireless communication facility shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located at a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. Number of Towers. More than one (1) wireless communication facility shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 19 5. Lighting. Wireless communication facilities shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a wireless communication facility. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. FAA Review. Any proposed wireless communication facility within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. Zoning Overlay Districts. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Colocation. Any wireless communication facility approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the facility approved shall be sized to accommodate any additional equipment necessary for other vendors/providers of communications services, if possible, to minimize the proliferation of new wireless communication facilities in the vicinity of the requested facility. The colocation of antennas and equipment on an existing wireless communication facility shall be permitted by right. 9. Design. A monopole wireless communication facility design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative wireless communication facility design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. 10. Removal. By applying for and being granted a special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the wireless communication facility and associated facilities from the site within ninety (90) days of the wireless communication facility no longer being used for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the county. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the wireless communication facility and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 11. Finish. A flat matte finish is recommended for wireless communication facilities and its associated hardware, antennas, and facilities so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 20 12. Signs. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (D) Application requirements: 1. All potential applicants for wireless communication facilities shall consult with county planning staff prior to submitting an application for a proposed wireless communication facility. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant with information on Roanoke County policies and standards for wireless communication facilities and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to wireless communication facility construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for wireless communication facilities shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed wireless communication facility sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible colocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed wireless communication facility and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed wireless communication facility site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared shall be established with the staff at the pre-application meeting. d. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants’ existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. e. All wireless communication facility applicants shall be required, at their expense, to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission hearing on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed facility. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre-application meeting. DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 21 f. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. SEC. 30-88. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. Sec. 30-88-2. Accessory Uses: Residential Use Types. (A) Residential use types may include the following accessory uses, activities or structures on the same site or lot: 11. Temporary portable storage containers provided that they meet the following standards: (c) All temporary portable storage containers shall may display the container provider's contact information. Signs shall not contain any other advertising for any other product or services. (e) Temporary portable storage containers should be located on a property in accordance with section 30-100-8, and shall not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or be located within any required landscaped area. Placement on Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) right of way property shall require written approval from VDOT. ARTICLE V – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEC. 30-100. MISCELLANEOUS. Sec. 30-100-13. Solar energy systems. (B) Solar energy systems are permitted in any zoning district and may be installed upon receipt of the necessary permit(s) from the County and subject to the following use and design standards: 3. Ground-Mounted and Pole-Mounted Solar Energy Systems: b. The surface area of a ground- or pole-mounted system, regardless of the mounted angle, shall be calculated as part of the overall lot coverage and accessory building coverage. The maximum surface area of a ground- or pole-mounted system shall not constitute more than ten (10) percent of the allowable lot coverage or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is less. be allowed as follows: DRAFT Zoning Ordinance Amendments – PC Recommended (July 2025) 22 One acre or less: 1,000 square feet Over one acre to five acres: 1,500 square feet Over five acres: 2,000 square feet AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLES I, II, III, IV AND V OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, as part of its work plan for 2025, the Planning Commission has an on-going process to review, evaluate, and develop appropriate amendments to the County's Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, these amendments generally correct inconsistencies, clarify issues or standards, add or amend definitions and uses, add or amend uses within certain zoning districts, develop or amend standards for existing or new uses, and create or revise development standards dealing with landscaping, parking, signage, lighting, or other development regulations; and WHEREAS, County staff have identified several proposed amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in consultation with the Roanoke County Planning Commission which would: amend Sec. 30-1 (Authority and Citation) in Article I (General Provisions); add or amend definitions dealing with broadcast tower, wireless communication facility, and temporary portable storage containers in Sec. 30-28 (Definitions) and Sec. 30-29 (Use Types; Generally) in Article II (Definitions and Use Types); amend Article III (District Regulations) by adding wireless communication facility, Class 1, Class 2, and/or Class 3 as a permitted use and/or as a special use in agricultural zoning districts (AG-3, AG-1, AR, AV), residential zoning districts (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4), commercial zoning districts (C-1, C-2), industrial zoning districts (I-1, I-2), and the EP (Explore Park) zoning district, and amend the site development regulations of the EP zoning district; amend and/or add use and design standards for accessory apartments, mini-warehouse, broadcasting tower, wireless communication facility, class 1, class 2, and class 3, and temporary portable storage containers as a residential accessory use in Article IV (Use and Design Standards); Page 2 of 23 and amend the development standards for ground-mounted and pole-mounted solar energy systems in Sec. 30-100-13 (Solar energy systems) in Article V (Development Standards); and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendments; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice are valid public purposes for such recommendations by the Planning Commission and action by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 8, 2025, and the second reading and public hearing were held on July 22, 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke as follows: 1. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: ARTICLE I – GENERAL PROVISIONS SEC. 30-1. AUTHORITY AND CITATION. (A) The provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to sections 15.2-2280 and 15.2- 2281, of the Code of Virginia, as amended. This ordinance, and all provisions contained herein, together with the official zoning map, a copy of which is on file in the department of development services, shall be known as the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and may be cited as such, or as the "Zoning Ordinance." The ordinance and official zoning map may be kept in either hardcopy or digital form. ARTICLE II – DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28. DEFINITIONS. (C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section shall have the meanings described below. Page 3 of 23 Above ground level (AGL): When referring to a support structure or tower, the distance measured from ground level at the base of the structure to an object or point on the structure such as an antenna, lightning rod or the top of the structure or tower. Antenna: Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic, radio, or television communications through the sending and/or receiving of electromagnetic waves. Antenna types include, but are not limited to, omni-directional "whip" antenna, directional panel antenna, parabolic antenna and other ancillary antenna designs. An antenna does not include the broadcasting tower or other support structure to which it is attached. Balloon test: A technique utilizing a balloon to demonstrate the height of a proposed support structure or tower. Colocate: To locate with another user on an existing structure such as a tower, power, phone or light pole; water tank or standpipe, building or steeple, billboard sign or similar structure. Micro-wireless facility: A small cell facility that is not larger in dimension than 24 inches in length, 15 inches in width, and 12 inches in height and that has an exterior antenna, if any, not longer than 11 inches. Small cell facility: A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet in volume, or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all of its exposed elements could fit within an imaginary enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the facility has a cumulative volume of not more than 28 cubic feet, or such higher limit as is established by the Federal Communications Commission. The following types of associated equipment are not included in the calculation of equipment volume: electric meter, concealment, telecommunications demarcation boxes, back-up power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cut-off switches, and vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services. Temporary portable storage containers: A purpose-built, fully enclosed, box-like container with or without signage on one (1) or more of its outer surfaces that is designed for temporary storage of household goods and/or equipment. Such containers are uniquely designed for ease of loading to and from a transport vehicle. SEC. 30-29. USE TYPES; GENERALLY. Sec. 30-29-7. Miscellaneous Use Types. Broadcasting tower: Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one (1) or more antennas on which an antenna or dish is installed for the transmission, broadcasting or receiving of radio, television, radar, or microwaves, and similar types of devices. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission Page 4 of 23 towers, microwave towers, common-carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers and wireless communication facilities, which are described separately. Wireless communication facility (WCF): All infrastructure and equipment including, but not limited to, antenna support structures, antennas, transmission cables, equipment shelters, equipment cabinets, utility pedestals, ground equipment, fencing, signage and other ancillary equipment associated with the transmission or reception of wireless communications. Class 1 – Wireless communication facilities with a height less than or equal to eighty (80) feet above ground level (AGL). Class 2 – Wireless communication facilities with a height greater than eighty (80) feet but less than or equal to one hundred twenty (120) feet above ground level (AGL). Class 3 – Wireless communication facilities with a height greater than one hundred twenty (120) feet but less than or equal to one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet above ground level (AGL). ARTICLE III – DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32. AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT. Sec. 30-32-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-33. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT. Page 5 of 23 Sec. 30-33-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * Page 6 of 23 SEC. 30-36. AV AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT. Sec. 30-36-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-42. R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-42-2. Permitted Uses. (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Page 7 of 23 Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-45. R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-45-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * SEC. 30-46. R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-46-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * Page 8 of 23 SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 5. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-54. C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * Page 9 of 23 SEC. 30-61. I-1 LOW INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 3. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * SEC. 30-62. I-2 HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-62-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * Page 10 of 23 SEC. 30-71. EP EXPLORE PARK DISTRICT. Sec. 30-71-3. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 6. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Miscellaneous Uses Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * Sec. 30-71-4. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (B) Height. Maximum structure height shall be 45 feet including rooftop mechanical. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (front, side, rear, or buffer) from an exterior property line is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet, up to a maximum height of 125 feet. Zip line towers, and observation towers, and wireless communication facilities shall be exempt from this section. ARTICLE IV – USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-82. RESIDENTIAL USES. Sec. 30-82-1. Accessory Apartments. (C) General standards in the C-1 and C-2 districts, independent of the general standards above: Page 11 of 23 1. The accessory apartment shall be allowed in conjunction with a civic, office, or commercial, or industrial use type. 2. The civic, office, or commercial, or industrial use type must occupy at least fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area on the site. SEC. 30-85. COMMERCIAL USES. Sec. 30-85-19. Mini-warehouse. (A) General standards: 5. No door openings for any cubicle shall be constructed facing any residentially zoned property. Reserved. SEC. 30-87. MISCELLANEOUS USES. Sec. 30-87-2. Broadcasting Tower. (A) Intent: The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting alternative broadcasting tower sites and broadcasting tower designs within the county. In addition, the county staff, planning commission and board of supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the Roanoke County community plan and the general special use permit criteria found in section 30-19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the county to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the county, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the county, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the county, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources. To this end, the county will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the county to encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. To achieve this end, the county encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures. Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. Page 12 of 23 When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the county to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. (A) General standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. Page 13 of 23 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading including any additional equipment necessary from other vendors/providers who collocate on the broadcasting tower. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being used for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 11. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 12. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. 13. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. Page 14 of 23 14. Any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (21) days shall be permitted. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (B) Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (21) days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (CB) Application requirements: Page 15 of 23 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with county planning staff at least thirty (30) days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible collocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section CB.1. above. d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. ed. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. fe. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre-application consultation. gf. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by section 30-87-2(DA)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. Page 16 of 23 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre-application conference. (D) General standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. Page 17 of 23 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre-approved by the board of supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the board of supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. Page 18 of 23 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (EC) General review policies: All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, planning commission and board of supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. Sec. 30-87-8. Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1, Class 2, Class 3. (A) Intent. The intent of these regulations for wireless communication facilities is: To encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. Page 19 of 23 To encourage the location of wireless communication facilities in non-residential areas and minimize the total number of towers and tower sites throughout the county. To strongly encourage the joint use of new and existing wireless communication facilities, and use of the existing utility transmission rights-of-way To encourage wireless communication facilities to locate in areas where the adverse impact on the surrounding community is minimal. To encourage users of wireless communication facilities to locate, design, and configure them in a way that minimizes their adverse visual impact, and makes them compatible with surrounding land uses, to the extent possible. To strongly encourage the use of monopoles and camouflage/stealth techniques for towers located in or near residential areas. To expand and improve high-speed broadband access and cell phone service availability in unserved and underserved areas; and to explore public-private partnerships to implement Roanoke County’s Rural Broadband Initiative to bring high-speed internet to homes without broadband access. (B) Small cell facility: 1. Permitted by right. A small cell facility installed by a wireless service provider on an existing structure or the installation or construction of a new structure not more than 50 feet above ground level containing a small cell facility shall be permitted by right. 2. Colocation. The wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider shall obtain permission from the owner of the existing structure to colocate the small cell facility on the existing structure and to colocate the associated transmission equipment on or proximate to the existing structure. 3. Permit Requests. A wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider may submit up to 35 permit requests for small cell facilities on a single application. 4. Review process. The review process and approval or disapproval of an application for small cell facilities shall be in accordance with Sec. 15.2-2316.4 of the Code of Virginia. 5. Other facilities. Facilities that do not meet the criteria to be deemed a small cell facility are subject to the regulations for wireless communication facility. (C) General Standards for wireless communication facilities: Page 20 of 23 1. Height. The maximum height of any proposed wireless communication facility and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any wireless communication facility and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest wireless communication facility and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. Facility setbacks. The setback for any proposed wireless communication facility shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the wireless communication facility to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the wireless communication facility. 3. Building/structure setbacks. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a wireless communication facility shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located at a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. Number of Towers. More than one (1) wireless communication facility shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Lighting. Wireless communication facilities shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a wireless communication facility. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. FAA Review. Any proposed wireless communication facility within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. Zoning Overlay Districts. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Colocation. Any wireless communication facility approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the facility approved shall be sized to accommodate any additional equipment necessary for other vendors/providers of communications services, if possible, to minimize the proliferation of new Page 21 of 23 wireless communication facilities in the vicinity of the requested facility. The colocation of antennas and equipment on an existing wireless communication facility shall be permitted by right. 9. Design. A monopole wireless communication facility design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative wireless communication facility design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. 10. Removal. By applying for and being granted a special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the wireless communication facility and associated facilities from the site within ninety (90) days of the wireless communication facility no longer being used for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the county. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the wireless communication facility and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 11. Finish. A flat matte finish is recommended for wireless communication facilities and its associated hardware, antennas, and facilities so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 12. Signs. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (D) Application requirements: 1. All potential applicants for wireless communication facilities shall consult with county planning staff prior to submitting an application for a proposed wireless communication facility. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant with information on Roanoke County policies and standards for wireless communication facilities and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to wireless communication facility construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for wireless communication facilities shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed wireless communication facility sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. Page 22 of 23 b. The location of all other possible colocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed wireless communication facility and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed wireless communication facility site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared shall be established with the staff at the pre-application meeting. d. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants’ existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. e. All wireless communication facility applicants shall be required, at their expense, to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission hearing on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed facility. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre-application meeting. f. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. SEC. 30-88. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. Sec. 30-88-2. Accessory Uses: Residential Use Types. (A) Residential use types may include the following accessory uses, activities or structures on the same site or lot: 11. Temporary portable storage containers provided that they meet the following standards: (c) All temporary portable storage containers shall may display the container provider's contact information. Signs shall not contain any other advertising for any other product or services. Page 23 of 23 (e) Temporary portable storage containers should be located on a property in accordance with section 30-100-8, and shall not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or be located within any required landscaped area. Placement on Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) right of way property shall require written approval from VDOT. ARTICLE V – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEC. 30-100. MISCELLANEOUS. Sec. 30-100-13. Solar energy systems. (B) Solar energy systems are permitted in any zoning district and may be installed upon receipt of the necessary permit(s) from the County and subject to the following use and design standards: 3. Ground-Mounted and Pole-Mounted Solar Energy Systems: b. The surface area of a ground- or pole-mounted system, regardless of the mounted angle, shall be calculated as part of the overall lot coverage and accessory building coverage. The maximum surface area of a ground- or pole-mounted system shall not constitute more than ten (10) percent of the allowable lot coverage or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is less. be allowed as follows: One acre or less: 1,000 square feet Over one acre to five acres: 1,500 square feet Over five acres: 2,000 square feet 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Page 1 of 1 A T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM E - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 8, 2025, designated as Item E - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes – June 24, 2025 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Stormwater Management Program) of the Roanoke County Code, to incorporate new lot drainage requirements on site plans and plot plans. (Second Reading) 3. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a lease agreement with Ride Source to lease two (2) parking spaces at the General Services Building on Kessler Mill Drive. (Second Reading) 4. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement at 7415 Wood Haven Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for construction of the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project, Hollins Magisterial District. (Second Reading) 5. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $19,184.82 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia for Technology Trust Funds. Page 1 of 8 Please Note: there is no 6:00 p.m. evening session because there are no public hearings scheduled. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June 2025. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Before the meeting was called to order, an invocation/a moment of silence was observed. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Remote Participation Approval It was confirmed that Supervisor Shepherd and Supervisor Mahoney’s request for remote participation were in accordance with the Roanoke County Policy and their request for remote participation was approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Radford Nays: None Abstain/No Vote: Supervisors Shepherd, Mahoney 2. Roll Call Present: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Absent: None Staff Present: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator; Rebecca Owens, Deputy County Administrator; Doug Blount, Assistant County Administrator; Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney; Madeline Hanlon, Community Engagement Director; Amy Whittaker, Public Information Officer and Rhonda D. Perdue, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board Staff Absent: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Minutes June 24, 2025 – 2:00 p.m. Page 2 of 8 B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS Action No. 062425-1 Item C.1 1. Resolution congratulating Matthew Neale for being named the 2026 Virginia Teacher of the Year. (David F. Radford, Supervisor, Windsor Hills Magisterial District) Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None Action No. 062425-2 Item C.2 2. Proclamation declaring June 16 through 24, 2025 as National Waste and Recycling Workers Week in the County of Roanoke. (Ashley King, Director of General Services) Supervisor North moved to approve the proclamation. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None D. PUBLIC HEARING Action No. 062425-3 Item D.1 1. Public Hearing to receive comments on the proposals submitted for the redevelopment of the Hollins Library located at 6624 Peters Creek Road in the County of Roanoke (Tax Id: 27.14-01-03.00-0000). (Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney) No citizens were present. E. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE Action No. 062425-4 Item E.1 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Stormwater Management Program) of the Roanoke County Code, to incorporate new lot drainage requirements on site plans and plot plans (Doug Blount, Assistant County Administrator and Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services) (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) Page 3 of 8 Supervisor Hooker moved to approve the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling the second reading for July 8, 2025. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None F. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE Action No. 062425-5 Item F.1 1. Ordinance Authorizing employee bonuses totaling $1,082,392 funded from reimbursements from the Commonwealth of Virginia and amending the General Fund Fiscal Year 2025 And 2026 Operating Revenues and Expenditures. (Richard Caywood, County Administrator) (Second Reading) Supervisor North moved to approve the ordinance. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None G. SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS Action No. 062425-6 Item G.1 1. Ordinance to adjust the salaries of the Members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County by applying a three percent inflation factor, pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 15.2-1414.3 of the Code of Virginia. (Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) No speakers were present. Supervisor Mahoney moved to approve the ordinance. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: Supervisor Hooker Action No. 062425-7 Item G.2 2. Ordinance amending Article V (Development Standards) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance regarding lot drainage requirements on site plans and plot plans. (Doug Blount, Assistant County Administrator and Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) No speakers were present. Page 4 of 8 Supervisor North moved to approve the ordinance. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None H. APPOINTMENTS Action No. 062425-8 Item H.1 1. Roanoke County Towing Advisory Board Commander Pat Pascoe, Sgt. Spencer Hoopes, Charles Brown and Jeffrey Robertson, Joseph Wood, and P. Jason Peters all to four (4) year terms to expire June 30, 2029. Supervisor Hooker moved to approve all appointments. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Abstain: Supervisor Shepherd I. CONSENT AGENDA Action No. 062425-9.a-m Item I.1-13 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY Action No. 062425-9.a Item I.1 1. Approval of minutes – June 10, 2025 Action No. 062425-9.b Item I.2 2. Ordinance appropriating new funds in the amount of $1,514,496 to Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) for a Bonus from the Commonwealth of Virginia and authorizing a transfer of funds between categories within the RCPS Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget. (Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.c Item I.3 3. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $328,811 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) for use by the Roanoke County Police Department for eight School Resource Officers. (Second Reading) Page 5 of 8 Action No. 062425-9.d Item I.4 4. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $322,675 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) for use by the Roanoke County Police Department for eight School Resource Officers. (Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.e Item I.5 5. Ordinance to appropriate funds in the amount of $48,272 from the Commonwealth of Virginia for the County of Roanoke Clerk of the Circuit Court for fiscal year 2026 and adding one Deputy Clerk position to the Compensation and Pay Plan. (Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.f Item I.6 6. Ordinance authorizing the execution of a lease agreement with Tinker Top, LLC for property to locate communication towers upon which is situated on Tinker Mountain approximately 3.7 miles north of Roanoke, Virginia in the County of Botetourt, Virginia. (Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.g Item I.7 7. Ordinance approving an agreement with the City of Salem, Virginia for the continuation of the McAfee Knob Trailhead Shuttle. (Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.h Item I.8 8. Resolution requesting the U.S. Department of Transportation fund an application to Implement the Roanoke County Safe Streets and Roads for All Comprehensive Safety Action Plan. Action No. 062425-9.i Item I.9 9. The petition of Shelley Friend to rezone approximately 4.51 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, to allow for a private stable located at 1709 Mayfield Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Action No. 062425-9.j Item I.10 10. The petition of Craighead & Associates to obtain a special use permit to operate a car wash on approximately 0.71 acre on land zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, located at 3664 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Page 6 of 8 Action No. 062425-9.k Item I.11 11. The petition of Challenge, LLC to obtain a special use permit to construct 28 townhouses on approximately 3.0 acres of land zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential District, located at 5811 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Action No. 062425-9.l Item I.12 12. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a lease agreement with Ride Source to lease two (2) parking spaces at the General Services Building on Kessler Mill Drive. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) Action No. 062425-9.m Item I.13 13. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement at 7415 Wood Haven Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for construction of the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project, Hollins Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) Supervisor North moved to adopt all matters on the consent agenda. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens, County property owners, and County business owners to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes, Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak. No citizens were present. K. REPORTS Action No. 062425-10 Item K.1-6 1. Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of May 31, 2025 Page 7 of 8 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of May 31, 2025 5. Accounts Paid – May 2025 6. Statement of the Treasurer’s Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 2025 Supervisor Hooker moved to receive and file the reports that have been included with the agenda under Item K. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Paul M. Mahoney 2. Tammy E. Shepherd 3. Phil C. North 4. Martha B. Hooker 5. David F. Radford Supervisors were offered the opportunity to share comments and provide updates to their peers and the public on items of interest to them. M. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to review key economic development partners and their roles in supporting Roanoke County businesses. (Megan Baker, Director of Economic Development) 2. Work session to discuss maintenance and beautification of Roanoke County’s Gateways. (Doug Blount, Assistant County Administrator) N. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: Action No. 062425-11 1. Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community. Specifically, the Board will discuss potential business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts. Supervisor Radford moved to go to closed session. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Page 8 of 8 Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford Nays: None Supervisor Shepherd departed the meeting. Supervisor Mahoney did not participate in the work session but rejoined the meeting and participated in the closed session. O. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION Action No. 062425-12 In the closed session just concluded, nothing was discussed except the matter which was identified in the motion to convene in closed session. Only those matters lawfully permitted to be discussed under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed. Supervisor Radford moved to adopt the certification resolution. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd P. ADJOURNMENT Action No. 062425-13 Supervisor North moved to adjourn the meeting. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd Submitted by: Approved by: __________________________ __________________________ Richard L. Caywood David F. Radford Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Chairman Page 1 of 3 ACTION NO. _________ ITEM NO. E.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 8, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Stormwater Management Program) of the Roanoke County Code, to incorporate new lot drainage requirements on site plans and plot plans SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir Director of Development Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Second Reading to amend Chapter 8.1 of Roanoke County Erosion and Stormwater Management (ESWM) Ordinance to incorporate lot drainage requirements for site plans and plot plans. BACKGROUND: On July 9, 2024, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 of the Roanoke County Code and repealed Chapter 23, creating a consolidated Erosion and Stormwater Management Program Ordinance. At that time, the Board requested staff to collaborate with the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association (RRHBA) and the development community to draft language addressing common citizen complaints related to lot drainage. On June 24, 2025, the Board of Supervisors approved a first reading of this ordinance and established July 8, 2025, for a second reading of this ordinance. There have been no changes since the first reading held on June 24, 2025. DISCUSSION: Following a work session about lot drainage on July 9, 2024, the Board asked staff to Page 2 of 3 work with RRHBA to revise existing lot drainage requirements. Staff collaborated over several months to develop changes that will benefit homeowners and remain reasonable for builders. The main focus has been on plot plan development, especially addressing drainage issues in neighborhoods and on lots with steep slopes. While subdivision drainage has improved over the past three years, challenges persist with the development of single lots in established neighborhoods; particularly on lots with steep slopes. Proposed changes: 1. Finished Floor Elevation • Must be documented on the site plan or plot plan. 2. Plot Plans • Shall demonstrate positive drainage away from permanent structures. • Shall require an adequate and current field survey: • If the development disturbs more than 5,000 sq. ft., plans must be prepared by a licensed professional (engineer, architect, land surveyor, or landscape architect registered in Virginia). • Developments disturbing 10,000 sq. ft. or more on parcels ≥1 acre are exempt from this survey requirement unless otherwise directed by the Director of Development Services. 3. Steep Slopes • Development on steep slopes must adhere to the Stormwater Management Design Manual. • An as-built survey by a licensed professional is required for all steep slopes with: a) A vertical height of 20 feet or more. b) A slope of 2:1 or steeper (regardless of height). ⦁ Stormwater management on steep slopes must include: a) Water diversions at the slope top to keep stormwater off steep slopes. b) Collection of runoff through reverse benches (installed at intervals not exceeding 20 ft of vertical height). c) Conveyance systems directing stormwater to an appropriate outfall. ⦁ There shall be no more than two reverse benches per parcel. In support of these changes: • RRHBA supports these proposed changes. Page 3 of 3 • The lot drainage standards are integrated into the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 30-90 and Sec. 30-100). • The Board of Supervisors approved the corresponding Zoning Ordinance amendment on June 24, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance to amend Chapter 8.1 of Roanoke County Erosion and Stormwater Management Ordinance with the effective date August 1, 2025. 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.1 (EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING LOT DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS ON SITE PLANS AND PLOT PLANS WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff have worked with the Planning Commission and the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association in developing proposed amendments to the Roanoke County Code, dealing with site plans and plot plans; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would amend the information required on site plans and plot plans to address individual lot drainage, stormwater management, and erosion and sediment control; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendments with minor changes; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice are valid public purposes for such recommendations by the Planning Commission and action by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of the proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance was held on June 10, 2025, and the second reading and public hearing were held on June 24, 2025; and WHEREAS, in addition to amending the zoning ordinance, companion provisions in Chapter 8.1 (Erosion and Sediment Control Program) of the County Code also must be amended in order to be consistent with the proposed changes to the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 24, 2025 and the second reading was held on July 8, 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke that: 1. Chapter 8.1 of the Roanoke County Code is amended as follows: 2 CHAPTER 8.1 - EROSION AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:27 of the Code of Virginia, this ordinance is adopted as part of an initiative to integrate the County of Roanoke stormwater management requirements with the County of Roanoke erosion and sediment control requirements into a consolidated erosion and stormwater management program. The erosion and stormwater management program is intended to facilitate the submission and approval of plans, issuance of permits, payment of fees, and coordination of inspection and enforcement activities for land-disturbing activities into a more convenient and efficient manner for both the County of Roanoke and those responsible for compliance with these programs. Section 8.1-1 TITLE, PURPOSE, AND AUTHORITY. A.This ordinance shall be known as the “Erosion and Stormwater Management Ordinance of the County of Roanoke.” B.The purpose of this ordinance is to ensure the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the County of Roanoke to protect the quality and quantity of state waters from the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater and soil erosion, including protection from a land disturbing activity causing unreasonable degradation of properties, water quality, stream channels, steep slopes, and other natural resources, and to establish procedures whereby stormwater requirements related to water quality and quantity shall be administered and enforced. C.This ordinance is authorized by § 62.1-44.15:27 of the Code of Virginia. D.Applicability of chapter in Town of Vinton: The provisions of this chapter shall be applicable within the corporate limits of the Town of Vinton. Administrative procedures and review fees may be established to accommodate the review of plans for development located within the Town. Section 8.1-2 DEFINITIONS. The following words and terms, when used in this ordinance, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. “Adequate channel” means a channel that will convey the designated frequency storm event without overtopping the channel bank nor causing erosive damage to the channel bed or banks. “Agreement in lieu of a plan” means a contract between the County of Roanoke and the owner or permittee that specifies methods that shall be implemented to comply with the requirements of the VESMA and this ordinance for the construction of a (i) single-family detached residential structure or (ii) farm building or structure on a parcel of land with a total impervious cover 3 percentage, including the impervious cover from the farm building or structure to be constructed, of less than five percent, or (iii) other regulated land disturbing activities that disturb less than 10,000 square feet; such contract may be executed by the County of Roanoke in lieu of a soil erosion control and stormwater management plan. “Administrator” means the County of Roanoke’s County Administrator or his or her designee who shall administer the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program established by this Ordinance. “Applicant” means any person submitting a soil erosion control and stormwater management plan to a VESMP authority for approval to obtain authorization to commence a land-disturbing activity. “Best management practice” or “BMP” means schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices, including both structural and nonstructural practices, to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and groundwater systems. 1.“Nonproprietary best management practice” means both structural and nonstructural practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and groundwater systems that are in the public domain and are not protected by trademark, patent, or copyright. 2.“Proprietary best management practice” means both structural and nonstructural practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and groundwater systems that are privately owned and controlled and may be protected by trademark , patent, or copyright. “Board” means the State Water Control Board. “Causeway” means a temporary structural span constructed across a flowing watercourse or wetland to allow construction traffic to access the area without causing erosion damage. “Channel” means a natural stream or manmade waterway. “Clean Water Act” or “CWA” means the federal Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1251 et seq.), formerly referred to as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, as amended by Public Law 95-217, Public Law 95- 576, Public Law 96-483, and Public Law 97-117, or any subsequent revisions thereto. “Cofferdam” means a watertight temporary structure in a river, lake, etc., for keeping the water from an enclosed area that has been pumped dry so that bridge foundations, dams, etc., may be constructed. “Common plan of development or sale” means a contiguous area where separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules. 4 “Comprehensive stormwater management plan” means a plan, which may be integrated with other land use plans or regulations that specifies how the stormwater quality components, quantity components, or both are to be managed based on an entire watershed or a portion thereof. The plan may also provide for the remediation of erosion, flooding, and water quality and quantity problems caused by prior development. “Constructed Ssteep Sslopes” means steep slopes that are created, or made steeper, by construction activities. “Construction activity” means any clearing, grading, or excavation associated with large construction activity or associated with small construction activity. “Control measure” means any BMP, stormwater facility, or other method used to minimize the discharge of pollutants to state waters. “CWA and regulations” mean the Clean Water Act and applicable regulations published in the Code of Federal Regulations promulgated thereunder. For the purposes of this ordinance, it includes state program requirements. “Dam” means a barrier to confine or raise water for storage or diversion, to create a hydraulic head, to prevent gully erosion, or to retain soil, rock, or other debris. “Denuded” means land that has been physically disturbed and no longer supports vegetative cover. “Department” or “DEQ” means the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. “Development” means land disturbance and the resulting landform associated with the construction of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational, transportation- related, or utility facilities or structures or the clearing of land for non-agricultural or non- silvicultural purposes. The regulation of discharges from development, for purposes of stormwater management, does not include the exclusions found in 9VAC25-875-860. “Dike” [or “levee”] means an earthen embankment constructed to confine or control water, especially one built along the banks of a river to prevent overflow of lowlands. “Discharge” when used without qualification, means the discharge of a pollutant. “Discharge of a pollutant” means: 1.Any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to state waters from any point source; or 2.Any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to the waters of the contiguous zone or the ocean from any point source other than a vessel or other floating craft which is being used as a means of transportation. 5 This definition includes addition of pollutants into surface waters from: surface runoff that is collected or channeled by man; discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances owned by a state, municipality, or other person that do not lead to a treatment works; and discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading into privately owned treatment works. This term does not include an addition of pollutants by any indirect discharger. “District” or “soil and water conservation district” means a political subdivision of the Commonwealth organized in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 (§ 10.1 -506 et seq.) of Chapter 5 of Title 10.1 of the Code of Virginia. “Diversion” means a channel with a supporting ridge on the lower side constructed across or at the bottom of a slope for the purpose of intercepting surface runoff. “Dormant” means denuded land that is not actively being brought to a desired grade or condition. “Drainage area” means a land area, water area, or both from which runoff flows to a common point. “Energy dissipator” means a non-erodible structure which reduces the velocity of concentrated flow to reduce its erosive effects. “Environmental Protection Agency” or “EPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Erosion and sediment control plan” means a document containing material for the conservation of soil and water resources of a unit or group of units of land. It may include appropriate maps, an appropriate soil and water plan inventory and management information with needed interpretations, and a record of decisions contributing to conservation treatment. The plan shall contain all major conservation decisions to ensure that the entire unit or units of land will be so treated to achieve the conservation objectives. “Erosion impact area” means an area of land that is not associated with a current land- disturbing activity but is subject to persistent soil erosion resulting in the delivery of sediment onto neighboring properties or into state waters. This definition shall not apply to any lot or parcel of land of 10,000 square feet or less used for residential purposes or to shorelines where the erosion results from wave action or other coastal processes. “ESC” means erosion and sediment control. “ESM plan” means a soil erosion control and stormwater management plan, commonly referred to as the erosion control and stormwater management plan. 6 “Farm building or structure” means the same as defined in § 36-97 of the Code of Virginia and includes any building or structure used for an agritourism activity, as defined in § 3.2-6400 of the Code of Virginia, and any related impervious services including roads, driveways, and parking areas. “Flood fringe” means the portion of the floodplain outside the floodway that is usually covered with water from the 100-year flood or storm event. This includes the flood or floodway fringe designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Flooding” means a volume of water that is too great to be confined within the banks or walls of the stream, water body, or conveyance system and that overflows onto adjacent lands, thereby causing or threatening damage. “Floodplain” means the area adjacent to a channel, river, stream, or other water body that is susceptible to being inundated by water normally associated with the 100-year flood or storm event. This includes the floodplain designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Flood-prone area” means the component of a natural or restored stormwater conveyance system that is outside the main channel. Flood -prone areas may include the floodplain, the floodway, the flood fringe, wetlands, riparian buffers, or other areas adjacent to the main channel. “Floodway” means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas, usually associated with flowing water, that must be reserved to discharge the 100-year flood or storm event without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. This includes the floodway designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Flume” means a constructed device lined with erosion-resistant materials intended to convey water on steep grades. “General permit” means a permit authorizing a category of discharges under the CWA and the VESMA within a geographical area. “Geotechnical Report” means a report prepared by a professional engineer that communicates site conditions; and recommends design, construction methods, and construction inspection. 1. The geotechnical report shall include information as determined by thea professional engineer, or as required by the Aadministrator, as follows: a. Summary of all subsurface exploration data, including subsurface soil profile;, b. exploration logs, laboratory or in situ test results, and groundwater information; c. Interpretation and analysis of the subsurface data; d. Specific engineering recommendations for design, construction, and construction inspection; 7 e. Discussion of conditions for solution of anticipated problems; and f. Recommended geotechnical special provisions. 2. The professional engineer may refer to the applicable sections of the “Checklist and Guidelines for Review of Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Pl ans and Specifications” contained in the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Publication No. FHWA ED-88-053, latest edition. 3. When required by the Administrator, the geotechnical report shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a permit. “Hydrologic Unit Code” or “HUC” means a watershed unit established in the most recent version of Virginia's 6th Order National Watershed Boundary Dataset unless specifically identified as another order. “Impervious cover” means a surface composed of material that significantly impedes or prevents natural infiltration of water into soil. “Incorporated place” means a city, town, township, or village that is incorporated under the Code of Virginia. “Inspection” means an on-site review of the project’s compliance with any applicable design criteria, or an on-site review to obtain information or conduct surveys or investigations necessary in the implementation or enforcement of the VESMA and applicable regulations. “Karst area” means any land area predominantly underlain at the surface or shallow subsurface by limestone, dolomite, or other soluble bedrock regardless of any obvious surface karst features. “Karst features” means sinkholes, sinking and losing streams, caves, large flow springs, and other such landscape features found in karst areas. “Land disturbance” or “land-disturbing activity” means a manmade change to the land surface that may result in soil erosion or has the potential to change its runoff characteristics, including construction activity such as the clearing, grading, excavating, or filling of land. “Land-disturbance approval” means an approval allowing a land-disturbing activity to commence as issued by the VESMP authority after the requirements of § 62.1-44.15:34 of the Code of Virginia have been met. “Large construction activity” means construction activity including clearing, grading, and excavating, except operations that result in the disturbance of less than five acres of total land area. Large construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than five acres of total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will 8 ultimately disturb five acres or more. Large construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. “Linear development project” means a land-disturbing activity that is linear in nature such as, but not limited to, (i) the construction of electric and telephone utility lines, and natural gas pipelines; (ii) construction of tracks, rights-of-way, bridges, communication facilities and other related structures of a railroad company; (iii) highway construction projects; (iv) construction of stormwater channels and stream restoration activities; and (v) water and sewer lines. Private subdivision roads or streets shall not be considered linear development projects. “Live watercourse” means a definite channel with bed and banks within which concentrated water continuously flows. “Locality” means the County of Roanoke. “Localized flooding” means smaller scale flooding that may occur outside of a stormwater conveyance system. This may include high water, ponding, or standing water from stormwater runoff, which is likely to cause property damage or unsafe conditions. “Main channel” means the portion of the stormwater conveyance system that contains the base flow and small frequent storm events. “Manmade” means constructed by man. “Minimize” means to reduce or eliminate the discharge of pollutants to the extent achievable using stormwater controls that are technologically available and economically practicable. “Minor modification” means modifications and amendments not requiring extensive review and evaluation including changes in EPA promulgated test protocols, increasing monitoring frequency requirements, changes in sampling locations, and changes to compliance dates within the overall compliance schedules. A minor permit modification or amendment does not substantially alter permit conditions, substantially increase or decrease the amount of surface water impacts, increase the size of the operation, or reduce the capacity of the facility to protect human health or the environment. “Natural channel design concepts” means the utilization of engineering analysis and fluvial geomorphic processes to create, rehabilitate, restore, or stabilize an open conveyance system for the purpose of creating or recreating a stream that conveys its bank-full storm event within its banks and allows larger flows to access its bank-full bench and its floodplain. “Natural stream” means a tidal or nontidal watercourse that is part of the natural topography. It usually maintains a continuous or seasonal flow during the year and is characterized as being irregular in cross-section with a meandering course. Constructed channels such as drainage ditches or swales shall not be considered natural streams; however, channels designed utilizing natural channel design concepts may be considered natural streams. 9 “Non-erodible” means a material that will not experience surface wear due to natural forces, such as riprap, concrete, plastic, etc. “Nonpoint source pollution” means pollution such as sediment, nitrogen, phosphorous, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and toxics whose sources cannot be pinpointed but rather are washed from the land surface in a diffuse manner by stormwater. “Operator” means the owner or operator of any facility or activity subject to the VESMA and this ordinance. In the context of stormwater associated with a large or small construction activity, operator means any person associated with a construction project that meets either of the following two criteria: (i) the person has direct operational control over construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to those plans and specifications or (ii) the person has day-to-day operational control of those activities at a project that are necessary to ensure compliance with a stormwater pollution prevention plan for the site or other permit or VESMP authority permit conditions (i.e., they are authorized to direct workers at a site to carry out activities required by the stormwater pollution prevention plan or comply with other permit conditions). “Owner” means the same as defined in § 62.1-44.3 of the Code of Virginia. For a regulated land-disturbing activity that does not require a permit, “owner” also means the owner or owners of the freehold of the premises or lesser estate therein, mortgagee or vendee in possession, assignee of rents, receiver, executor, trustee, lessee, or other person, firm, or corporation in control of a property. “Peak flow rate” means the maximum instantaneous flow from a prescribed design storm at a particular location. “Percent impervious” means the impervious area within the site divided by the area of the site multiplied by 100. “Permit” or “Construction General Permit (CGP)” means the General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities found at 9VAC25-880-70. Coverage under this permit is issued by the Department pursuant to § 62.1-44.15 of the Code of Virginia for stormwater discharges from a land-disturbing activity. “Permittee” means the person to whom the permit is issued. “Person” means any applicant, owner, individual, partnership, firm, association, joint venture, public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative, county, city, town, or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth, governmental body, including a federal or state entity as applicable, any interstate body, or any other legal entity. “Plot plan” means a detailed drawing that shows the existing layout of a property and any proposed improvements and meets the requirements of the County of Roanoke’s Zoning Ordinance (County of Roanoke Code Section 30-100-1). 10 “Point of discharge” means a location at which concentrated stormwater runoff is released. “Point source” means any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance including any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, landfill leachate collection system, vessel, or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture or agricultural stormwater runoff. “Pollutant discharge” means the average amount of a particular pollutant measured in pounds per year or another standard reportable unit as appropriate, delivered by stormwater runoff. “Pollution” means such alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological properties of any state waters as will or is likely to create a nuisance or render such waters (a) harmful or detrimental or injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare, or to the health of animals, fish, or aquatic life; (b) unsuitable with reasonable treatment for use as present or possible future sources of public water supply; or (c) unsuitable for recreational, commercial, industrial, agricultural, or other reasonable uses, provided that (i) an alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological property of state waters, or a discharge or deposit of sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes to state waters by any owner which by itself is not sufficient to cause pollution, but which, in combination with such alteration of, or discharge or deposit to state waters by other owners, is sufficient to cause pollution; (ii) the discharge of untreated sewage by any owner into state waters; and (iii) contributing to the contravention of standards of water quality duly established by the State Water Control Board, are “pollution” for the terms and purposes of this ordinance. “Post-development” refers to conditions that reasonably may be expected or anticipated to exist after completion of the land development activity on a specific site or tract of land. “Predevelopment” refers to the conditions that exist at the time that plans for the land- disturbing activity are submitted to the VESMP authority. Where phased development or plan approval occurs (preliminary grading, demolition of existing structures, roads, and utilities, etc.), the existing conditions at the time prior to the commencement of land-disturbing activity shall establish predevelopment conditions. “Prior developed land” means land that has been previously utilized for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational, transportation-related, or utility facilities or structures, and that will have the impervious areas associated with those uses altered during a land- disturbing activity. “Qualified personnel” means a person knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control and stormwater management who possesses the skills to assess conditions at the construction site for the operator that could impact stormwater quality and quantity and to assess the effectiveness of any erosion and sediment control measures or stormwater management facilities selected to control the quality and quantity of stormwater discharges from the construction activity. 11 “Responsible land disturber” or “RLD” means an individual holding a certificate issued by the department who is responsible for carrying out the land-disturbing activity in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan or ESM plan. The RLD may be the owner, applicant, permittee, designer, superintendent, project manager, contractor, or any other project or development team member. The RLD must be designated on the erosion and sediment control plan, ESM plan, or permit as defined in this ordinance as a prerequisite for engaging in land disturbance. “Runoff” or “stormwater runoff” means that portion of precipitation that is discharged across the land surface or through conveyances to one or more waterways. “Runoff characteristics” includes maximum velocity, peak flow rate, volume, and flow duration. “Runoff volume” means the volume of water that runs off the land development project from a prescribed storm event. “Sediment basin” means a temporary impoundment built to retain stormwater, sediment, and debris with a controlled stormwater release structure. “Sediment trap” means a temporary impoundment built to retain stormwater, sediment, and debris which is formed by constructing an earthen embankment with a stone outlet. “Sheet flow” (also called “overland flow”) means shallow, unconcentrated, and irregular flow down a slope. Overland flow usually does not exceed 200 feet under natural conditions. “Shoreline erosion control project” means an erosion control project approved by local wetlands boards, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, the Department, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers and located on tidal waters and within non-vegetated or vegetated wetlands as defined in Title 28.2 of the Code of Virginia. “Site” means the land or water area where any facility or land-disturbing activity is physically located or conducted, including adjacent land used or preserved in connection with the facility or land-disturbing activity. Areas channelward of mean low water in tidal Virginia shall not be considered part of a site. “Site hydrology” means the movement of water on, across, through, and off the site as determined by parameters including soil types, soil permeability, vegetative cover, seasonal water tables, slopes, land cover, and impervious cover. “Slope drain” means a pipe, tube, or conduit made of nonerosive material extending from the top to the bottom of a cut or fill slope with an energy dissipator at the outlet end for the purpose of carrying stormwater down the slope in a non-erosive manner. “Small construction activity” means: 12 1. Construction activities including clearing, grading, and excavating that result in land disturbance that is equal to or greater than one acre and less than five acres. Small construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five acres. Small construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. The department may waive the otherwise applicable requirements in a general permit for a stormwater discharge from construction activities that disturb less than five acres where stormwater controls are not needed based on an approved “total maximum daily load” (TMDL) that addresses the pollutants of concern or, for nonimpaired waters that do not require TMDLs, an equivalent analysis that determines allocations for small construction sites for the pollutants of concern or that determines that such allocations are not needed to protect water quality based on consideration of existing in-stream concentrations, expected growth in pollutant contributions from all sources, and a margin of safety. The pollutants of concern include sediment or a parameter that addresses sediment (such as total suspended solids, turbidity, or siltation) and any other pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body that will receive a discharge from the construction activity. The operator shall certify to the Department that the construction activity will take place, and stormwater discharges will occur, within the drainage area addressed by the TMDL or provide an equivalent analysis. As of the start date in Table 1 of 9VAC25-31-1020, all certifications submitted in support of the waiver shall be submitted electronically by the owner or operator to the Department in compliance with this subdivision and 40 CFR Part 3 (including, in all cases, 40 CFR Part 3 Subpart D), 9VAC25-875-940, and Part XI (9VAC25-31-950 et seq.) of the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permit Regulation. Part XI of 9VAC25-31 is not intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of Part XI of 9VAC25-31, permittees may be required to report electronically if specified by a particular permit. 2. Any other construction activity designated by either the Department or the EPA regional administrator, based on the potential for contribution to a violation of a water quality standard or for significant contribution of pollutants to surface waters. “Soil erosion” means the movement of soil by wind or water into state waters or onto lands in the Commonwealth. “Soil erosion control and stormwater management plan,” commonly referred to as the erosion control and stormwater management plan, or “ESM plan” means a document describing methods for controlling soil erosion and managing stormwater in accordance with the requirements adopted pursuant to the VESMA. The ESM plan may consist of aspects of the erosion and sediment control plan and the stormwater management plan as each is described in this ordinance. “Stabilized” means land that has been treated or protected to withstand normal exposure to natural forces without incurring erosion damage. 13 “State” means the Commonwealth of Virginia. “State application” or “application” means the standard form or forms, including any additions, revisions, or modifications to the forms, approved by the Administrator and the Department for applying for a permit. “State Water Control Law” means Chapter 3.1 (§ 62.1-44.2 et seq.) of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia. “State waters” means all water, on the surface and under the ground, wholly or partially within or bordering the Commonwealth or within its jurisdiction, including wetlands. “Steep slope” means a slope greater than 3:1, or thirty-three and one-third (33.3) percent. “Storm sewer inlet” or “storm drainage inlet” means a structure through which stormwater is introduced into an underground conveyance system. “Stormwater,” for the purposes of the VESMA, means precipitation that is discharged across the land surface or through conveyances to one or more waterways and that may include stormwater runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage. “Stormwater conveyance system” means a combination of drainage components that are used to convey stormwater discharge, either within or downstream of the land-disturbing activity. This includes: 1. “Manmade stormwater conveyance system” means a pipe, ditch, vegetated swale, or other stormwater conveyance system constructed by man except for restored stormwater conveyance systems; 2. “Natural stormwater conveyance system” means the main channel of a natural stream and the flood-prone area adjacent to the main channel; or 3. “Restored stormwater conveyance system” means a stormwater conveyance system that has been designed and constructed using natural channel design concepts. Restored stormwater conveyance systems include the main channel and the flood-prone area adjacent to the main channel. “Stormwater detention” means the process of temporarily impounding runoff and discharging it through a hydraulic outlet structure to a downstream conveyance system. “Stormwater management facility” means a control measure that controls stormwater runoff and changes the characteristics of that runoff including the quantity and quality, the period of release, or the velocity of flow. 14 “Stormwater management plan” means a document containing material describing methods for complying with the requirements of the VESMP. “Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan” or “SWPPP” means a document that is prepared in accordance with good engineering practices and that identifies potential sources of pollutants that may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges. A SWPPP required under the VESMP for construction activities shall identify and require the implementation of control measures and shall include or incorporate by reference an approved erosion and sediment control plan, an approved stormwater management plan, and a pollution prevention plan. “Subdivision” means the same as defined in § 15.2-2201 of the Code of Virginia. “Surface waters” means: 1. All waters that are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; 2. All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; 3. All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds for which the use, degradation, or destruction would affect or could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: a. That are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; b. From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or c. That are used or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce; 4. All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as surface waters under this definition; 5. Tributaries of waters identified in subdivisions 1 through 4 of this definition; 6. The territorial sea; and 7. Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in subdivisions 1 through 6 of this definition. Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of the CWA and the law, are not surface waters. Surface waters do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior 15 converted cropland by any other agency, for the purposes of the CWA, the final authority regarding the CWA jurisdiction remains with the EPA. “SWM” means stormwater management. “Temporary vehicular stream crossing” means a temporary non-erodible structural span installed across a flowing watercourse for use by construction traffic. Structures may include bridges, round pipes, or pipe arches constructed on or through non-erodible material. “Ten-year storm” means a storm that can produce rainfall expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average of once in 10 years. It may also be expressed as an exceedance probability with a 10% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. “Total maximum daily load” or “TMDL” means the sum of the individual wasteload allocations for point sources, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources, natural background loading, and a margin of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in terms of either mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. The TMDL process provides for point versus nonpoint source trade- offs. “Town” means an incorporated town. “Two-year storm” means a storm that can produce rainfall expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average of once in two years. It may also be expressed as an exceedance probability with a 50% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. “Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Act” or “VESMA” means Article 2.3 (§ 62.1- 44.15:24 et seq.) of Chapter 3.1, State Water Control Law, of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia. “Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program” or “VESMP” means a program established by the VESMP authority for the effective control of soil erosion and sediment deposition and the management of the quality and quantity of runoff resulting from land-disturbing activities to prevent the unreasonable degradation of properties, stream channels, waters, and other natural resources. The program shall include such items as local ordinances, rules, requirements for permits and land-disturbance approvals, policies and guidelines, technical materials, and requirements for plan review, inspection, and enforcement consistent with the requirements of the VESMA. “Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program Authority” or “VESMP Authority” means the County of Roanoke as approved by the Department to operate the VESMP. “Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit” or “VPDES permit” means a document issued by the department pursuant to the State Water Control Law authorizing, under prescribed conditions, the potential or actual discharge of pollutants from a point source to surface waters. 16 “Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse” means a website collection that contains detailed design standards and specifications for control measures that may be used in Virginia to comply with the requirements of the VESMA and associated regulations. “Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook” means a book collection of pertinent information that provides general guidance for compliance with the VESMA and associated regulations and is developed by the Department with advice from a stakeholder advisory committee. “Wasteload allocation” or “wasteload” means the portion of a receiving surface water’s loading or assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources of pollution. Wasteload allocation is a type of water quality-based effluent limitation. “Water quality technical criteria” means standards set forth in regulations adopted pursuant to the VESMA that establish minimum design criteria for measures to control nonpoint source pollution. “Water quantity technical criteria” means standards set forth in regulations adopted pursuant to the VESMA that establish minimum design criteria for measures to control localized flooding and stream channel erosion. “Watershed” means a defined land area drained by a river or stream, karst system, or system of connecting rivers or streams such that all surface water within the area flows through a single outlet. In karst areas, the karst feature to which water drains may be consi dered the single outlet for the watershed. “Wetlands” means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Section 8.1-3 ADMINISTRATION OF CHAPTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH SUBDIVISION AND ZONING ORDINANCES. This chapter shall be administered, where applicable, in conjunction with the County of Roanoke’s subdivision and zoning ordinances wherein such apply to the development and subdivision of land within the County of Roanoke or where such apply to development on previously subdivided land within the County of Roanoke. Section 8.1-4 VIRGINIA EROSION AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ESTABLISHED. Pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:27 of the Code of Virginia, the County of Roanoke hereby establishes a Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program for land-disturbing activities and adopts the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Regulation that specifies standards and specifications for VESMPs promulgated by the State Water Control Board for the purposes set 17 out in Section 1.1 of this Ordinance. The County of Roanoke hereby designates the County Administrator or his or her designee as the Administrator of the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program established by this Ordinance. The County of Roanoke will utilize the policies, criteria, and information contained within the County of Roanokeits Stormwater Management Design Manual for proper implementation of the requirements of this chapter. This manual will be periodically updated subject to the authorization and approval of the Board of Supervisors by resolution. Section 8.1-5 REGULATED LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. A. Land-disturbing activities that meet one of the criteria below are regulated as follows: 1. Land-disturbing activity that disturbs 2,500 square feet or more, is less than one acre, and is subject to criteria defined in Article 2 (9VAC25-875-540 et seq.) and Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V unless Article 4 (9VAC25-875-670 et seq) of Part V of the Regulation is applicable, as determined in accordance with 9VAC25 -875-480 and 9VAC25-875-490. 2. Land-disturbing activity that disturbs less than one acre, but is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that disturbs one acre or more, is subject to criteria defined in Article 2 (9VAC25-875-540 et seq.) and Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V unless Article 4 (9VAC25-875-670 et seq) of Part V of the Regulation is applicable, as determined in accordance with 9VAC25-875-480 and 9VAC25-875-490. 3. Land-disturbing activity that disturbs one acre or more is subject to criteria defined in Article 2 (9VAC25-875-540 et seq.) and Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V unless Article 4 (9VAC25-875-670 et seq.) of Part V is applicable, as determined in accordance with 9VAC25-875-480 and 9VAC25-875-490. B. Land-disturbing activities exempt per 9VAC25-875-90 are not required to comply with the requirements of the VESMA unless otherwise required by federal law. Section 8.1-6 REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PLANS; PROHIBITIONS. A. A person who wishes to conduct a land-disturbing activity in the County of Roanoke shall submit a soil erosion control and stormwater management plan (ESM) that is consistent with the requirements of the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Act (VESMA). Activities not required to comply with the VESMA are defined in 9VAC25-875-90. B. A person shall not conduct any land-disturbing activity in the County of Roanoke until: 1. Such person submits an application that includes a permit registration statement, if required, a soil erosion control and stormwater management plan or an executed agreement in lieu of a plan, if required, to the County of Roanoke; 18 2.Such person submits the name of the individual who will be assisting them in carrying out the activity and this individual shall hold a Responsible Land Disturber certificate pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:30 of the Code of Virginia. Failure to provide the name of an individual holding a Responsible Land Disturber certificate prior to engaging in land- disturbing activities may result in revocation of the land-disturbance approval and shall subject the owner to the penalties provided by the VESMA; and 3.The County of Roanoke has issued its land-disturbance approval. C.The County of Roanoke may require changes to an approved ESM plan in the following cases: 1.Where inspection has revealed that the plan is inadequate to satisfy applicable regulations or ordinances; or 2.Where the owner finds that because of changed circumstances or for other reasons the plan cannot be effectively carried out, and proposed amendments to the plan, consistent with the requirements of the Act, are agreed to by the VESMP authority and the owner. D.To prevent further erosion, the County of Roanoke may require approval of an erosion and sediment control plan and a stormwater management plan for any land it identifies as an erosion impact area, pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:34 of the Code of Virginia. E.As a part of the land-disturbance approval process, the County of Roanoke may require the applicant to submit a reasonable performance bond with surety, cash escrow, letter of credit, any combination thereof, or such other legal arrangement acceptable to the County of Roanoke, to ensure that it can take measures at the applicant’s expense should he/she fail, after proper notice, within the time specified to comply with the conditions it imposes as a result of his/her land-disturbing activity. If the County of Roanoke takes such action upon such failure by the applicant, it may collect from the applicant the difference should the amount of the reasonable cost of such action exceed the amount of the security held. If the applicant fulfills the VESMP authority’s conditions, the County of Roanoke will refund to the applicant or terminate, as applicable, such bond, cash escrow, letter of credit, or other legal arrangement, or the unexpended or unobligated portion thereof. F.Exceptions 1.The applicant may request the County of Roanoke to grant an exception to waive or modify any of the erosion and sediment control requirements of Article 2 (9VAC25- 875-540 et seq.) of Part V (9VAC25-875-470 et seq.) that are deemed inappropriate or too restrictive for site conditions under these conditions: a.At the time of plan submission, an applicant may request an exception to become part of the approved erosion and sediment control plan. The applicant shall explain the reasons for requesting exceptions in writing and shall provide adequate studies 19 or other documentation. Specific exceptions which are allowed by the County of Roanoke shall be documented in the plan. b. During construction, the person responsible for implementing the approved plan may request an exception in writing from the County of Roanoke. If the County of Roanoke does not approve an exception in writing within 10 days of receipt of the request, the request shall be disapproved. Following disapproval, the applicant may resubmit an exception request with additional studies or other documentation. 2. The applicant may request the County of Roanoke to grant an exception to the provisions of Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V. An exception may be granted by the County of Roanoke provided that (i) the exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief, (ii) reasonable and appropriate conditions shall be imposed as necessary upon any exception granted so that the intent of the VESMA is preserved, (iii) granting the exception will not confer any special privileges that are denied in other similar circumstances, and (iv) exception requests are not based upon conditions or circumstances that are self-imposed or self-created. 3. Economic hardship alone is not a sufficient reason to grant an exception from the requirements of this chapter. 4. Under no circumstance shall the applicant be granted an exception (i) to the requirement that the land-disturbing activity obtain required permits, or (ii) for the use of a BMP not found through the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse, except as allowed under Article 4 (9VAC25-875-670 et seq.) of Part V of this chapter. 5. No exception to or waiver of post-development nonpoint source nutrient runoff compliance requirements shall be granted unless offsite options have been considered and found not available in accordance with subsection D of § 62.1-44.15:35 of the Code of Virginia. 6. A record of all exceptions granted shall be maintained by the County of Roanoke in accordance with allwith all applicable laws. Section 8.1-7 STORMWATER PERMIT REQUIREMENT; EXEMPTIONS. A. Except as provided herein, no person may engage in any land-disturbing activity until the County of Roanoke has granted land disturbance approval in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance and the Regulation. B. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this ordinance, the following activities are not required to comply with the requirements of this ordinance unless otherwise required by federal law: 1. Minor land-disturbing activities, including home gardens and individual home landscaping, repairs, and maintenance work; 20 2. Installation, maintenance, or repair of any individual service connection; 3. Installation, maintenance, or repair of any underground utility line when such activity occurs on an existing hard surfaced road, street, or sidewalk, provided the land- disturbing activity is confined to the area of the road, street, or sidewalk that is hard surfaced; 4. Installation, maintenance, or repair of any septic tank line or drainage field unless included in an overall plan for land-disturbing activity relating to construction of the building to be served by the septic tank system; 5. Permitted surface or deep mining operations and projects, or oil and gas operations and projects conducted pursuant to Title 45.2 of the Code of Virginia; 6. Clearing of lands specifically for bona fide agricultural purposes; the management, tilling, planting, or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural, or forest crops; livestock feedlot operations; agricultural engineering operations, including construction of terraces, terrace outlets, check dams, desilting basins, dikes, ponds, ditches, strip cropping, lister furrowing, contour cultivating, contour furrowing, land drainage, and land irrigation; or as additionally set forth by the Board in regulations. However, this exception shall not apply to harvesting of forest crops unless the area on which harvesting occurs is reforested artificially or naturally in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11 (§ 10.1-1100 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) or is converted to bona fide agricultural or improved pasture use as described in subsection B of § 10.1-1163 of the Code of Virginia; 7. Installation of fence and signposts or telephone and electric poles and other kinds of posts or poles; 8. Shoreline erosion control projects on tidal waters when all of the land-disturbing activities are within the regulatory authority of and approved by local wetlands boards, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers; however, any associated land that is disturbed outside of this exempted area shall remain subject to the VESMA and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto; 9. Repair or rebuilding of the tracks, rights-of-way, bridges, communication facilities, and other related structures and facilities of a railroad company; 10. Land-disturbing activities in response to a public emergency where the related work requires immediate authorization to avoid imminent endangerment to human health or the environment. In such situations, the person conducting the land-disturbing activity shall advise the County of Roanoke of the disturbance within seven days of commencing the land-disturbing activity and shall comply with the administrative requirements of subsection A within 30 days of commencing the land-disturbing activity; and 21 11.Discharges to a sanitary sewer or a combined sewer system that are not from a land - disturbing activity. C.Notwithstanding this ordinance and in accordance with the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Act, Article 2.3 (§ 62.1-44.15:24 et seq.) of Chapter 3.1 of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia, the following activities are required to comply with the soil erosion control requirements but are not required to comply with the water quantity and water quality technical criteria, unless otherwise required by federal law: 1.Activities under a state or federal reclamation program to return an abandoned property to an agricultural or open land use; 2.Routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original construction of the project. The paving of an existing road with a compacted or impervious surface and reestablishment of existing associated ditches and shoulders shall be deemed routine maintenance if performed in accordance with this subsection; and 3.Discharges from a land-disturbing activity to a sanitary sewer or a combined sewer system. Section 8.1-8 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN; CONTENTS OF PLANS. A.A stormwater pollution prevention plan shall include, but not be limited to, an approved erosion and sediment control plan, an approved stormwater management plan, a pollution prevention plan for regulated land-disturbing activities, and a description of any additional control measures necessary to address a TMDL pursuant to subsection D of this section. B.A soil erosion control and stormwater management (ESM) plan consistent with the requirements of the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Act (VESMA) and regulations must be designed and submitted to and approved by the County of Roanoke prior to land disturbance in accordance with the VESMA, this ordinance, and attendant regulations. This plan shall be implemented during construction as approved or modified by the County of Roanoke. C.A stormwater pollution prevention plan that identifies potential sources of pollutants that may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges from the construction site and describe control measures that will be used to minimize pollutants in stormwater discharges from the construction site must be developed before land disturbance commences. D.In addition to the other requirements of thisof this section, if a specific wasteload allocation for a pollutant has been established in an approved TMDL and is assigned to stormwater discharges from a construction activity, additional control measures must be identified and 22 implemented by the operator so that discharges are consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the wasteload allocation. E. The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must address the following requirements as specified in 40 CFR 450.21, to the extent otherwise required by state law or regulations and any applicable requirements of a state permit: 1. Control stormwater volume and velocity within the site to minimize soil erosion; 2. Control stormwater discharges, including both peak flow rates and total stormwater volume, to minimize erosion at outlets and to minimize downstream channel and stream bank erosion; 3. Minimize the amount of soil exposed during construction activity; 4. Minimize the disturbance of steep slopes; 5. Minimize sediment discharges from the site. The design, installation, and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls must address factors such as the amount, frequency, intensity and duration of precipitation, the nature of resulting stormwater runoff, and soil characteristics, including the range of soil particle sizes expected to be present on the site; 6. Provide and maintain natural buffers around surface waters, direct stormwater to vegetated areas to increase sediment removal and maximize stormwater infiltration, unless infeasible; 7. Minimize soil compaction and, unless infeasible, preserve topsoil; 8. Stabilization of disturbed areas must, at a minimum, be initiated immediately whenever any clearing, grading, excavating, or other earth disturbing activities have permanently ceased on any portion of the site, or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 calendar days. Stabilization must be completed within a time frame determined by the VESMP authority. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas where initiating vegetative stabilization measures immediately is infeasible, alternative stabilization measures must be employed as specified by the County of Roanoke; and 9. Utilize outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface, unless infeasible, when discharging from basins and impoundments. F. The SWPPP shall be amended whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to state waters and that has not been previously addressed in the SWPPP. The SWPPP must be maintained at a central location onsite. If an onsite location is unavailable, notice of the SWPPP’s location must be posted near the main entrance at the construction site. 23 Section 8.1-9 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN; CONTENTS OF PLAN. A. A stormwater management plan shall be developed and submitted to the County of Roanoke. The stormwater management plan shall be implemented as approved or modified by the County of Roanoke and shall be developed in accordance with the following: 1. A stormwater management plan for a land-disturbing activity shall apply the stormwater management technical criteria set forth in this ordinance and Article 4 (9VAC25-875-670 et seq) of Part V of the Regulation to the entire land-disturbing activity. Individual lots in new residential, commercial, or industrial developments, including those developed under subsequent owners, shall not be considered separate land-disturbing activities. 2. A stormwater management plan shall consider all sources of surface runoff and all sources of subsurface and groundwater flows converted to surface runoff. B. A complete stormwater management plan shall include the following elements: 1. Information on the type of and location of stormwater discharges, information on the features to which stormwater is being discharged including surface waters or karst features, if present, and predevelopment and post-development drainage areas; 2. Contact information including the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the owner and the tax reference number and parcel number of the property or properties affected; 3. A narrative that includes a description of current site conditions and final site conditions or if allowed by the VESMP authority, the information provided and documented during the review process that addresses the current and final site conditions; 4. A general description of the proposed stormwater management facilities and the mechanism through which the facilities will be operated and maintained after construction is complete; 5. Information on the proposed stormwater management facilities, including (i) detailed narrative on the conversion to a long-term stormwater management facility if the facility was used as a temporary ESC measure; (ii) the type of facilities; (iii) location, including geographic coordinates; (iv) acres treated; and (v) the surface waters or karst features into which the facility will discharge; 6. Hydrologic and hydraulic computations, including runoff characteristics; 7. Documentation and calculations verifying compliance with the water quality and quantity requirements of these regulations; 24 8. A map of the site that depicts the topography of the site and includes: a. All contributing drainage areas; b. Existing streams, ponds, culverts, ditches, wetlands, other water bodies, and floodplains; c. Soil types, geologic formations if karst features are present in the area, forest cover, and other vegetative areas; d. Current land use including existing structures, roads, and locations of known utilities and easements; e. Sufficient information on adjoining parcels to assess the impacts of stormwater from the site on these parcels and to assess the impacts of stormwater from the adjoining parcels on the site; f. The limits of clearing and grading, and the proposed drainage patterns on the site; g. Proposed buildings, roads, parking areas, utilities, and stormwater management facilities; and h. Proposed land use with tabulation of the percentage of surface area to be adapted to various uses, including planned locations of utilities, roads, and easements; 9. Plans and plot plans shall be designed from a current topographic field survey that is referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1988 and North American Datum 1983, and such plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional. The survey must meet the minimum requirements of the Roanoke County of Roanoke Stormwater Management Design Manual. Plot plans whose associated with site development plans that were previously approved using a different survey datum shall use the datums of the approved site development plans. Plot plans for development that disturbs less than 10,000 square feet on lots of one acre or larger are exempt from the requirement to provide a topographic field survey, unless required by the aAdministrator. 9.10. If an operator intends to meet the requirements established in 9VAC25-875-580 or 9VAC25-875-600 using off-site compliance options, where applicable, then a letter of availability from the off-site provider must be included; and. 10.11. If the County of Roanoke requires payment of a fee with the stormwater management plan submission, the fee and the required fee form in accordance with Section 5-8 of this ordinance must have been submitted. C. All final plan elements, specifications, or calculations of the stormwater management plans whose preparation requires a license under Chapter 4 (§ 54.1-400 et seq.) or Chapter 22 (§ 54.1- 2200 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia shall be appropriately signed and 25 sealed by a professional who is licensed to engage in practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Nothing in this subsection shall authorize any person to engage in practice outside his area of professional competence. Section 8.1-10 POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN; CONTENTS OF PLANS. A. A plan for implementing pollution prevention measures during construction activities shall be developed, implemented, and updated as necessary. The pollution prevention plan shall detail the design, installation, implementation, and maintenance of effective pollution prevention measures as specified in 40 CFR 450.21(c) to address dewatering requirements and in 40 CFR 450.21(d) to minimize the discharge of pollutants. At a minimum, such measures must be designed, installed, implemented, and maintained to: 1. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from equipment and vehicle washing, wheel wash water, and other wash waters. Wash waters must be treated in a sediment basin or alternative control that provides equivalent or better treatment prior to discharge; 2. Minimize the exposure of building materials, building products, construction wastes, trash, landscape materials, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, detergents, sanitary waste, and other materials present on the site to precipitation and to stormwater; and 3. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from spills and leaks and implement chemical spill and leak prevention and response procedures. B. The pollution prevention plan shall include effective best management practices to prohibit the following discharges in accordance with 40 CFR 450.21(e): 1. Wastewater from washout of concrete, unless managed by an appropriate control; 2. Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds, and other construction materials; 3. Fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance; and 4. Soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing. C. The pollution prevention plan shall include appropriate controls for the discharge from dewatering activities, including discharges from dewatering trenches in accordance with 40 CFR 450.21(c). Section 8.1-11 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN; CONTENTS OF PLANS A. An erosion and sediment control plan, which is a component of the ESM plan, shall be filed for a development and the buildings constructed within, regardless of the phasing of construction. The erosion and sediment control plan shall contain all major conservation decisions to ensure that the entire unit or units of land will be so treated to achieve the 26 erosion and sediment control criteria, techniques, and methods (i.e., the minimum standards) in 9VAC25-875-560. The erosion and sediment control plan may shall include: 1. PAll plans and plot plans shall be shall be designed from a current topographic field survey that is referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1988 and North American Datum 1983, and such plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional. The survey must meet the minimum requirements of the Roanoke County of Roanoke Stormwater Management Design Manual. Plot plans whose associated with site development plans that were previously approved using a different survey datum shall use the datums of the approved site development plans. Plot plans for development that disturbs less than 10,000 square feet on lots of one acre or larger are exempt from the requirement to provide a topographic field survey, unless required by the aAdministrator;. 1.2.Appropriate maps; 2.3.An appropriate soil and water plan inventory and management information with needed interpretations; and 3.4.A record of decisions contributing to conservation treatment. B. The person responsible for carrying out the plan shall provide the name of an individual holding a Responsible Land Disturber (RLD) certificate who will oversee and be responsible for carrying out the land-disturbing activity to the County of Roanoke. C. If individual lots or sections in a residential development are being developed by different property owners, all land-disturbing activities related to the building construction shall be covered by an erosion and sediment control plan or an "Agreement in Lieu of a Plan" signed by the property owners. Section 8.1-12 TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR REGULATED LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. A. To protect the quality and quantity of state waters from the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater runoff resulting from land-disturbing activities, the County of Roanoke hereby adopts the technical criteria for regulated land-disturbing activities set forth in Part V of 9VAC25-875 expressly to include 9VAC25-875-580 (water quality design criteria requirements); 9VAC25-875-590 (water quality compliance); 9VAC25-875-600 (water quantity); 9VAC25-875-610 (offsite compliance options); 9VAC25-875-620 (design storms and hydrologic methods); 9VAC25-875-630 (stormwater harvesting); 9VAC25- 875-640 (linear development projects); 9VAC25-875-650 (stormwater management impoundment structures or facilities), the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, as amended, and those more stringent local criteria which the County Board of Supervisors may adopt by resolution and incorporate into the manual of regulations and policies entitled “Stormwater Management Design Manual” and “Design and Construction Standards Manual,” which shall apply to all land-disturbing activities regulated pursuant to this ordinance, except as expressly set forth in Subsection B of this Section. 27 B. Steep Slopes; Positive Drainage. 1. All development that requires an erosion and sediment control plan or an Agreement in Lieu of a Plan shall address the following requirements: a. If the grade of a site is more than thirty-three and one-third (33.3) percent, the site design must comply with the International Building Code, Chapter 18, as amended, for foundation clearances from slopes. b. Development on steep slopes shall meet the requirements contained in the Countgy County of Roanoke Stormwater Management Design Manual. b. Concentrated stormwater flows shall be kept off of steep slopes by water diversions placed at the top of the slope , or by other means. Constructed steep slopes shall collect stormnwaterstormwater runoff on the slope by the provision of reverse benches placed at intervals not to exceed twenty (20) vertical feet with an adequate stormwater conveyance system to collect the stormwater and convey it to an adequate outfall at the bottom of the slope. No more than two reverse benches shall be required on any one parcel. .Cut slopes or fill slopes shall not be greater than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical), unless a geotechnical report is provided for the proposed slopes. c. Cut slopes or fill slopes shall not be greater than twenty-five (25) vertical feet in height, unless a geotechnical report is provided for the proposed slopes. Cut slopes or fill slopes less than or equal to 3:1 (horizontal: vertical) may exceed twenty-five (25) vertical feet in height and shall not require a geotechnical report. c. d. An aAs-built plans consisting of a field survey certified by thean appropriate design professional , shall be submitted to the County of Roanoke for all constructed steep slopes that have a vertical height of twenty (20) feet or more. Additionally, Additionall, all constructed steep slopes with a slope of 2:1 or steeper shall providehave a certified as-built plan , regardless of vertical height, ; and constructed steep slopes with a slope of 2:5:1 or steeper, but less than 2:1 shall providehave a certified as-built plan , if the vertical height is five (5) feet or greater.For any cut slopes or fill slopes greater than or equal to 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or greater than or equal to twenty-five (25) vertical feet in height with a slope greater than 3:1 (horizontal: vertical), an as-built plan showing that the finished geometry, based on a field survey performed by a licensed surveyor, is in substantial conformity with the design shall be provided to the County of Roanoke. d. e. Fill materials, compaction methods, and density specifications shall be indicated on the plan. Fill areas intended to support structures shall also be indicated on the plan. 28 2.Any plan for a new subdivision shall show proposed lot grades to ensure positive drainage away from all permanent structures. C.Stream buffers. 1.Except as provided in this section, each regulated land-disturbing activity shall provide for stream buffers for the purposes of retarding runoff, preventing stream bank erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from runoff. 2.The stream buffer on existing undeveloped land shall extend a minimum of 25 feet on each side of any perennial stream or contiguous wetlands, measured horizontally from the edge of the contiguous wetlands or from the ordinary high-water mark if no wetlands exist. 3.The stream buffer on previously developed land shall either meet the requirements of (ii) above or extend from the side of any perennial stream or contiguous wetlands, measured horizontally from the edge of the contiguous wetlands or from the ordinary high-water mark if no wetlands exist to the edge of existing paved surfaces, structures, or other hardscape, whichever is less. 4.Each stream buffer shall be retained in as natural a condition as possible. Natural ground contours and native vegetation shall be preserved to the fullest possible extent. 5.The following types of improvements and activities shall not be required to retain, establish, or manage a stream buffer, provided that the requirements of this section are satisfied: 1.The construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of electric, gas and telephone transmission lines, railroads, and activities of the Virginia Department of Transportation and their appurtenant structures, which are accomplished in compliance with § 62.1-44.15:27 (Virginia Programs for Erosion Control and Stormwater Management) or an erosion and sediment control plan approved by the Board. 2.The construction, installation, and maintenance by public agencies of storm drainage, water, and sewer lines. 3.The construction and installation of water and sewer lines constructed by private interests for dedication to public agencies, if all the following are satisfied: i.To the extent practical, as determined by the Administrator, the location of the water or sewer lines, shall be outside of all stream buffer areas. ii.No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to construct, install and maintain the water or sewer lines. 29 iii. All construction and installation of the water or sewer lines shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements and permits and be conducted in a manner that protects water quality. 6. The following types of structures, control measures, and activities shall be allowed in a stream buffer, provided that the requirements of this section are satisfied: 1. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures, provided that to the extent practical, as determined by the Administrator, the control measures shall be located outside of the stream buffer and disturbance impacts are minimized. Upon removal of the temporary measures, grading and plantings shall be provided to reestablish the stream buffer by restoring pre-development grades and providing appropriate plantings. 2. Water-dependent facilities, water wells, passive recreation access, such as pedestrian trails and multi-use paths, historic preservation, and archaeological activities provided that all applicable federal, state, and local permits are obtained. 3. Storm drainage facilities necessary to drain to the stream, and stormwater management best management practices, provided that the disturbance to the buffer is minimized. 4. Roads, streets, and driveways if disturbance to the natural stream channel and buffer is limited to the minimum reasonably required to develop the site. Whenever practical, roads, streets, and driveways shall not be constructed parallel to a stream within the buffer. 5. Selective removal of invasive plants and reestablishment of vegetative buffer using native plants. 6. Stream drainage improvements that comply with all federal and state permitting requirements. Where channel improvements are made, stream buffers shall be reestablished on both sides of the improved channel. There shall be no stream buffer requirements where streams are replaced with storm drainage pipes. 7. Stream buffers shall be indicated on erosion and sediment control plans and plot plans, and they shall be physically marked and protected in the field with safety fencing or other appropriate means prior to the commencement of clearing or grading. 8. Any lot that was platted prior to July 27, 2021, and any land disturbance with an erosion and sediment control plan that was submitted to the County of Roanoke for review prior to July 27, 2021, are exempt from the requirements to protect and establish stream buffers. 30 D. Finished floor elevations shall be included on all building plans submitted to the County. The County will verify finished floor elevations prior to building footing inspections and will submit in writing to the developer confirming compliance before the footing inspection takes place. D.E. Nothing in this section shall preclude an operator from constructing to a more stringent standard at his/her discretion. Section 8.1-13 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT DISTURB LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET. A. Land-disturbing activity of less than 2,500 square feet on individual lots in a residential development shall not be considered exempt from the provisions of this chapter, if the total land-disturbing activity in the development is equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet. B. Land-disturbing activities shall meet all the requirements of this chapter, except that the technical provisions contained in 9VAC25-875-560 shall not apply to land disturbing activities that meet the requirements of this section. These include: 1. The adequacy of downstream channels and pipes are not required to be analyzed and verified. 2. No stormwater management measures to address any flow rate capacity or velocity requirements for downstream natural or man-made channels shall be required. C. An agreement in lieu of a plan may, at the discretion of the County of Roanoke, be substituted for an erosion and sediment control plan if executed by the County of Roanoke. All the requirements of section 5.1 shall apply. This provision expands the use of an agreement in lieu of a plan to all land-disturbing activities that disturb less than ten thousand 10,000 square feet. Additional requirements include: 1. Where the land-disturbing activity from the construction of a single-family residence results in less than five thousand (5,000) square feet of disturbed area, an “agreement in lieu of a plan” shall be accompanied by a plot plan that complies with Section 30-90 of the County of Roanoke’s Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 8 of theits Stormwater Management Design Manualmeets the County building permit plot plan requirements. 2. Where the land-disturbing activity from the construction of a single-family residence results in 5,000 square feet or more of disturbed area, an “agreement in lieu of a plan” shall be accompanied by a plot plan that complies with Section 30-90 of the County of Roanoke’s Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 8 of theits Stormwater Management Design Manualmeets the County building permit plot plan requirements, and it shall be prepared by a responsible land disturber, Virginia professional engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, architect, or professional soil scientist. A responsible land disturber must also be provided and identified. 31 3. Plot plans shall show positive drainage away from permanent structures and they shall be designed from a topographic field survey that indicates current site conditions. The field survey shall be referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1988 and North American Datum 1983 and shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional. The survey must meet the minimum requirements of the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Design Manual. Development that disturbs less than 10,000 square feet on parcels of one acre or larger are exempted from the requirement to provide a field survey, unless the Administrator determines that a field survey is required. 3.4.The County of Roanoke may require additional information or may decline to execute an agreement in lieu of a plan and may require an erosion and sediment control plan in instances where, in the County of Roanoke’sAdministrator’s opinion, it is necessary to properly protect downstream properties or the environment. Section 8.1-14 LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORMWATER FACILITIES. A. The operator shall submit a construction record drawing for permanent stormwater management facilities to the County of Roanoke in accordance with 9VAC25-875-535. The record drawing shall contain a statement signed by a professional registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia pursuant to Chapter 4 of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia, stating that to the best of their knowledge, the construction record drawing shows all adjustments and revisions to the Stormwater Management Plan made during construction, and it shall serve as a permanent record of the actual location of all constructed elements. B. The operator shall submit a “Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement” that provides for the long-term responsibility and maintenance of stormwater management facilities and other techniques specified to manage the quality and quantity of runoff. Such requirements shall be set forth in an instrument recorded in the local land records prior to general permit termination or earlier as required by the County of Roanoke and shall at a minimum: 1. Be submitted to the County of Roanoke for review and approval prior to the approval of the stormwater management plan; 2. Be stated to run with the land; 3. Provide for all necessary access to the property for purposes of maintenance and regulatory inspections; 4. Provide for inspections and maintenance and the submission of inspection and maintenance reports to the County of Roanoke and 5. Be enforceable by all appropriate governmental parties. C. At the discretion of the County of Roanoke such recorded instruments need not be required 32 for stormwater management facilities designed to treat stormwater runoff primarily from an individual residential lot on which they are located, provided it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County of Roanoke that future maintenance for those facilities will be addressed through an enforceable mechanism at the discretion of the County of Roanoke. Section 8.1-15 MONITORING AND INSPECTIONS. A. The land-disturbing activity is subject to monitoring and inspections by the County of Roanoke. These inspections will be used to determine if there is: 1. Compliance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan; 2. Compliance with the approved stormwater management plan; 3. Development, updating, and implementation of a pollution prevention plan; and 4. Development and implementation of any additional control measures necessary to address a TMDL. B. The land-disturbing activity is subject to periodic and documented inspections by the County of Roanoke in accordance with its Department-approved alternative inspection program. C. Permanent stormwater management facilities are subject to periodic and documented inspections by the County of Roanoke to determine if such facilities are adequately maintained and functioning, as designed. D. The County of Roanoke may utilize the inspection reports of the owner of a stormwater management facility as part of an inspection program established in subsection B of this section if the inspection is conducted by a person who is licensed as a professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor pursuant to Article 1 (§ 54.1-400 et seq.) of Chapter 4 of Title 54.1; a person who works under the direction and oversight of the licensed professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor; or a person who holds an appropriate certificate of competence from the Department. E. Stormwater management facilities designed to treat stormwater runoff primarily from an individual residential lot on which they are located and for which a recorded instrument is not required pursuant to 9VAC25-875-130, may be subject to periodic inspections by the County of Roanoke, or the County of Roanoke may conduct homeowner outreach and education or employ other methods targeted at promoting the long-term maintenance of such facilities. Section 8.1-16 HEARINGS. A. Any applicant or operator, or person subject to the requirements of this ordinance, 33 aggrieved by any action of the County of Roanoke taken without a formal hearing, or by inaction of the County of Roanoke, may demand in writing a formal hearing by the County Administrator or his or her designee, provided a petition requesting such hearing is filed with the Administrator within 30 days after notice of such action is given by the Administrator. B.The hearings held under this Section shall be conducted by the County Administrator or his or her designee on behalf of the County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors atSupervisors at any time and place authorized by the County Administrator or his or her designee, and such hearings shall be held in a manner consistent with local hearing procedures. In the event the County Administrator does not designate another individual to be the Administrator of this Ordinance, then the County Administrator shall designate someone other than the County Administrator to conduct the hearings held under this Section. C.A verbatim record of the proceedings of such hearings shall be taken and filed with the Clerk to the County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors. Depositions may be taken and read as in actions at law. D.The County Administrator or his or her designee shall have power to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, and at the request of any party shall issue such subpoenas. The failure of a witness without legal excuse to appear or to testify or to produce documents shall be acted upon by the County Administrator or his or her designee, whose action may include the procurement of an order of enforcement from the circuit court. Witnesses who are subpoenaed shall receive the same fees and reimbursement for mile age as in civil actions. E.During the review, the County Administrator or his or her designee shall consider evidence presented by all parties. After considering the evidence, the County Administrator’s (or his or her designee’s) decision shall be final. Section 8.1-17 APPEALS. Final decisions of the County Administrator or his or her designee, under this chapter, shall be conducted in accordance with local appeal procedures and shall be subject to judicial review by the Roanoke County Circuit Court, provided an appeal is filed within thirty (30) days from the date of any written decision adversely affecting the rights, duties, or privileges of any permit applicant, permittee, or person subject to any enforcement action under this chapter. Section 8.1-18 RIGHT OF ENTRY. A.Pursuant to all applicable law, the County of Roanoke or any duly authorized agent thereof, bearing proper credentials and identification, may, at reasonable times and under reasonable circumstances, enter any establishment or upon any property, public or private, which has a permit or a maintenance agreement, for the purpose of obtaining information 34 or conducting surveys or investigations necessary in the enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance. B. If the Administrator has cause to believe an activity regulated under this ordinance is occurring without a permit, or if the person in charge of the property refuses to allow the Administrator to enter in accordance with subsection (A), then the Administrator may present sworn testimony to a magistrate or court of competent jurisdiction and request the issuance of an inspection warrant to enter the property for the purpose of making such inspection and investigation. The Administrator shall make a reasonable effort to obtain consent from the owner or person in charge of the property prior to seeking the issuance of an inspection warrant under this section. C. Pursuant to all applicable law, and in accordance with a performance bond with surety, cash escrow, letter of credit, any combination thereof, or such other legal arrangement, the County of Roanoke or any duly authorized agent thereof, bearing proper credentials and identification, may, at reasonable times and under reasonable circumstances, also enter any establishment or upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of initiating or maintaining appropriate actions that are required by conditions imposed by the County of Roanoke on a land-disturbing activity when an owner, after proper notice, has failed to take acceptable action within the time specified. Section 8.1-19 ENFORCEMENT. A. If the Administrator determines that there is a failure to comply with the land disturbance approval or determines there is an unauthorized discharge, notice shall be served upon the operator or person responsible for carrying out the conditions of the land disturbance approval by any of the following: verbal warnings and inspection reports, notices of corrective action, consent special orders, and notices to comply. Written notices shall be served by registered or certified mail to the address specified in the application or by delivery at the site of the development activities to the agent or employee supervising such activities. 1. The notice shall specify the measures needed to comply with the conditions of the land disturbance approval and shall specify the time within which such measures shall be completed. Upon failure to comply within the time specified, a stop work order may be issued in accordance with Subsection 2 or the permit may be revoked by the Administrator. 2. If an operator or person responsible for carrying out the conditions of the land- disturbance approval fails to comply with a notice issued in accordance with this Section within the time specified, the Administrator may issue a stop work order requiring the owner, operator, person responsible for carrying out an approved plan, or the person conducting the land-disturbing activities without an approved plan or required land disturbance approval to cease all land-disturbing activities until the violation has ceased, or an approved plan and required land-disturbance approval are obtained, and specified corrective measures have been completed. 35 Such orders shall be issued in accordance with the County of Roanoke’s enforcement procedures and this ordinance. Such orders shall become effective upon service on the person by certified mail, return receipt requested, sent to his/her address specified in the land records of the locality, or by personal delivery by an agent of the Administrator. However, if the Administrator finds that any such violation is grossly affecting or presents an imminent and substantial danger of causing harmful erosion of lands or sediment deposition in waters within the watersheds of the Commonwealth or otherwise substantially impacting water quality, the Administrator may issue, without advance notice or hearing, an emergency order directing such person to cease immediately all land-disturbing activities on the site and shall provide an opportunity for a hearing, after reasonable notice as to the time and place thereof, to such person, to affirm, modify, amend, or cancel such emergency order. If a person who has been issued an order is not complying with the terms thereof, the Administrator mayAdministrator may institute a proceeding for an injunction, mandamus, or other appropriate remedy in accordance with Subsection 5.7.C. B.In addition to any other remedy provided by this Ordinance, if the Administrator or his designee determines that there is a failure to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance, they may initiate such informal and/or formal administrative enforcement procedures in a manner that is consistent with the County of Roanoke’s enforcement procedures and this ordinance. C.Any person violating or failing, neglecting, or refusing to obey any rule, regulation, ordinance, order, approved standard or specification, or any condition of the land- disturbance approval by the Administrator may be compelled in a proceeding instituted in the Circuit Court of Roanoke County by the County of Roanoke to obey same and to comply therewith by injunction, mandamus, or other appropriate remedy. Section 8.1-20 PENALTIES, INJUNCTIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ACTIONS. A.A civil penalty may be imposed and a summons issued for violations that include but are not limited to the following, in accordance with § 62.1-44.15:63: 1.Commencement of land disturbing activity without Construction General Permit coverage from Department (i.e., no permit registration statement submitted) ($1,000 per day); 2.Commencement of land disturbing activity without preparation of a SWPPP ($500 per day); 3.Commencement of land disturbing activity with an incomplete SWPPP, or failure to properly amend a SWPPP to reflect changes in design, construction, operation, or maintenance that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters and has not been previously addressed in the SWPPP ($300 per day); 36 4. State permit registration statement not posted or SWPPP not available for review ($300 per day); 5. Failure to comply with SWPPP requirements ($300 per day); 6. Commencement of land-disturbing activity without an approved erosion and sediment control plan or land-disturbance approval pursuant to Section 3.2 ($1,000 per day); 7. Failure to install stormwater BMPs or erosion and sediment controls ($300 per day); 8. Failure to comply with the minimum standards in 9VAC25-875-560 ($300 per day); 9. Improperly installed or improperly maintained stormwater BMPs or erosion and sediment controls ($300 per day); 10. Operational deficiencies ($300 per day); 11. Failure to conduct and document required inspections ($300 per day); 12. Incomplete, improper, or missed inspections, including lack of proper signature ($300 per day); 13. Discharges not in compliance with the requirements of Section 9VAC25-880-70 of the Construction General Permit ($300 per day); 14. Failure to obey a Stop Work Order ($1,000 per day); and 15. Failure to stop work when permit is revoked ($1,000 per day). B. Each day during which the violation is found to have existed shall constitute a separate offense. However, in no event shall a series of specified violations arising from the same operative set of facts result in civil penalties which exceed a total of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), except that a series of violations arising from the commencement of land- disturbing activities without an approved plan for any site shall not result in civil penalties which exceed a total of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). The assessment of civil penalties according to this schedule shall be in lieu of criminal sanctions and shall preclude the prosecution of such violation as a misdemeanor under subsection (a) of this section. C. The Administrator may issue a summons for collection of the civil penalty and the action may be prosecuted in the appropriate court. 1. The Administrator, or his or her assignee, shall serve upon any owner or permittee in violation of this chapter, a summons notifying the owner or permittee of said violation. If unable to serve the owner or permittee in person, the County may notify by summons an owner or permittee committing or suffering the existence of a violation by certified, 37 return receipt requested mail, of the infraction. The Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office may also deliver the summons. The summons shall contain the following information: i. The name and address of the person charged. ii. The nature of the violation and chapter provision(s) being violated. iii. The location, date, and time that the violation occurred, or was observed. iv. The amount of the civil penalty assessed for the violation. v. The manner, location, and time that the civil penalty may be paid to the County of Roanoke. vi. The right of the recipient of the summons to elect to stand trial for the infraction. 2. The summons shall provide that any person summoned for a violation may, within five (5) days of actual receipt of the summons or, within ten (10) days from the date of mailing of the summons, elect to pay the civil penalty by making an appearance in person, or in writing by mail to the County of Roanoke Treasurer's Office and, by such appearance, may enter a waiver of trial, admit liability, and pay the civil penalty established for the violation charged and provide that a signature to an admission of liability shall have the same force and effect as a judgment in court; however, an admission shall not be deemed a criminal conviction for any purpose. 3. If a person charged with a violation does not elect to enter a waiver of trial and admit liability, the County of Roanoke shall cause the sheriff of the County of Roanoke to serve the summons on the person charged in the manner prescribed by law. The violation shall be tried in General District Court in the same manner and with the same right of appeal as provided for in Title 8.01 of the Code of Virginia. In any trial for a scheduled violation authorized by this section, it shall be the burden of the County of Roanoke to show the liability of the violator by the preponderance of the evidence. Any admission of liability or finding of liability shall not be a criminal conviction for any purpose. 4. The remedies provided for in this section are cumulative, and are not exclusive and, except as provided above, shall be in addition to any other remedies by law. 5. The owner or permittee may pay the civil penalty to the treasurer prior to the trial date, provided he also pays necessary court costs in addition to the civil penalty. 6. Within the period prescribed in (c), above, the owner or permittee, may contest the violation by presenting it to Administrator, who shall certify the contest in writing, on an appropriate form, to the General District Court. 38 7. Failure to pay the civil penalty, or to contest the violation, within the time period prescribed in (c), above, shall result in the immediate issuance of a stop work order and the revocation of the permit, if any. D. The owner of property which has sustained damage, or which is in imminent danger of being damaged, may apply to the Roanoke County Circuit Court to enjoin a violation or a threatened violation of Va. Code §§ 62.1-44.15:55, 62.1-44.15:56, without the necessity of showing that an adequate remedy at law does not exist. E. Civil penalty enumerated. Without limiting the remedies which may be obtained in this section, any person violating or failing, neglecting, or refusing to obey any injunction, mandamus or other remedy obtained pursuant to this section shall be subject, in the discretion of the court, to a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each violation. A civil action for such violation or failure may be brought by the County of Roanoke. Any civil penalties assessed by a court shall be paid into the treasury of the County of Roanoke, except that where the violator is the locality itself, or its agent, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid into the state treasury F. With the consent of any person who has violated or failed, neglected, or refused to obey any regulation or condition of a permit or any provision of this chapter, the County of Roanoke may provide for the payment of civil charges for violations in specific sums, not to exceed the limit specified in subsection (b)(2) of this section. Such civil charges shall be instead of any appropriate civil penalty which could be imposed under subsection (b) or (e). G. In addition to the penalties provided under this chapter, any person who violates any provision of this chapter may be liable to the County of Roanoke in a civil action for damages. H. In imposing a civil penalty pursuant to this Subsection, the court may consider the degree of harm caused by the violation and the economic benefit to the violator from noncompliance. I. Any civil penalties assessed by a court because of a summons issued by the County of Roanoke shall be paid into the treasury of the County of Roanoke to be used for the purpose of minimizing, preventing, managing, or mitigating pollution of the waters of the locality and abating environmental pollution therein in such manner as the court may, by order, direct. J. Notwithstanding any other civil or equitable remedy provided by this ordinance or by law, any person who willfully or negligently violates any provision of this ordinance, any order of the Administrator, any condition of the land-disturbance approval, or any order of a court shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by confinement in jail for not more than 12 months or a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $32,500, or both. Section 8.1-21 FEES. 39 A. Fees to cover costs associated with implementation of a VESMP related to land disturbing activities and issuance of general permit coverage and VESMP authority permits shall be imposed in accordance with Table 1. [NOTE: Such fee attributes include the costs associated with plan review, VESMP registration statement review, permit issuance, state-coverage verification, inspections, reporting, and compliance activities associated with land-disturbing activities as well as state program oversight costs.] When a site or sites has/have been purchased for development within a previously permitted common plan of development or sale, the applicant shall be subject to fees (“total fee to be paid by applicant” column) in accordance with the disturbed acreage of their site or sites according to Table 1. Table 1: Fees for permit issuance Fee type Total fee to be paid by applicant (includes both the County of Roanoke and Department portions, where applicable) Department portion of “total fee to be paid by applicant” (based on 28% of total fee paid*) Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Land-Disturbing Activity (not subject to General Permit coverage; sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act localities with land- disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet and less than 1 acre) $290 $0 General/Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre.) $290 $81 General /Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 acre and less than 5 Acres) $2,700 $756 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $3,400 $952 40 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $4,500 $1,260 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $6,100 $1,708 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) $9,600 $2,688 *If the project is completely administered by the Department, such as may be the case for a state or federal project or projects covered by individual permits, then the entire applicant fee shall be paid to the Department. B.Fees for the modification or transfer of registration statements from the general permit issued by the department shall be imposed in accordance with Table 2. If the general permit modifications result in changes to stormwater management plans that require additional review by [Locality], such reviews shall be subject to the fees set out in Table 2. The fee assessed shall be based on the total disturbed acreage of the site. In addition to the general permit modification fee, modifications resulting in an increase in total disturbed acreage shall pay the difference in the initial permit fee paid and the permit fee that would have applied for the total disturbed acreage in Table 1. Table 2: Fees for the modification or transfer of registration statements for the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities Type of Permit Fee Amount General/Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre) $20 General/Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 1 and less than 5 acres) $200 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $250 41 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $300 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $450 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) $700 C. The following annual permit maintenance shall be imposed in accordance with Table 3, including fees imposed on expired permits that have been administratively continued. With respect to the general permit, these fees shall apply until the permit coverage is terminated. [NOTE: Fees specified in this Subsection go to the County of Roanoke.] Table 3: Permit Maintenance Fees Type of Permit Fee Amount Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act - Land-Disturbing Activity (not subject to General Permit coverage; sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet and less than 1 acre) $50 General/Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage less than 1 acre) $50 General/Stormwater Management - Small Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance equal to or greater than 1 acre and less than 5 acres) $400 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 10 acres) $500 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less than 50 acres) $650 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than 100 acres) $900 General/Stormwater Management - Large Construction Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater 100 acres) $1,400 42 General permit coverage maintenance fees shall be paid annually to the County of Roanoke by the anniversary date of general permit coverage. No permit will be reissued or automaticall y continued without payment of the required fee. General permit coverage maintenance fees shall be applied until a Notice of Termination is effective. D. The fees set forth in Subsections A through C of this section, shall apply to: 1. All persons seeking coverage under the general permit. 2. All permittees who request modifications to or transfers of their existing registration statement for coverage under a general permit. 3. Persons whose coverage under the general permit has been revoked shall apply to the Department for an Individual Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities. E. Permit and permit coverage maintenance fees outlined under Section 5.8 may apply to each general permit holder. F. No general permit application fees will be assessed to: 1. Permittees who request minor modifications to general permits as defined in Section 1.2 of this ordinance. Permit modifications at the request of the permittee resulting in changes to stormwater management plans that require additional review by the County of Roanoke shall not be exempt pursuant to this Section. 2. Permittees whose general permits are modified or amended at the initiative of the Department, excluding errors in the registration statement identified by the County of Roanoke orRoanoke or errors related to the acreage of the site. G. All incomplete payments will be deemed as non-payments, and the applicant shall be notified of any incomplete payments. Interest may be charged for late payments at the underpayment rate set forth in § 58.1-15 of the Code of Virginia and is calculated monthly at the applicable periodic rate. A 10% late payment fee shall be charged to any delinquent (over 90 days past due) account. The County of Roanoke shallRoanoke shall be entitled to all remedies available under the Code of Virginia in collecting any past due amount. Section 8.1-22 PERFORMANCE BOND. A. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall be required to submit a reasonable performance bond with surety, cash escrow, letter of credit, any combination thereof, or such other legal arrangement acceptable to the County of Roanoke Attorney, to ensure that measures could be taken by the County of Roanoke at the applicant’s expense should he/she fail, after proper notice, within the time specified to initiate or maintain appropriate actions which may be required of him/her by the permit conditions as a result of his/her land disturbing activity. If the County of Roanoke takes such action upon such 43 failure by the applicant, the County of Roanoke mayRoanoke may collect from the applicant for the difference should the amount of the reasonable cost of such action exceed the amount of the security held, if any. Within 60 days of the completion of the requirements of the permit conditions, such bond, cash escrow, letter of credit or other legal arrangement, or the unexpended or unobligated portion thereof, shall be refunded to the applicant or terminated. 2. This ordinance shall be effective on August 1, 2025. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.3 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 Knob Trailhead shuttle service. No vehicles for sale or additional parking is permitted. The term of the lease is for one (1) year with renewals permitted. The County can expand or diminish the number of leased spaces at each renewal. Ride Source will pay rent of $50 per month to lease the parking spaces. Either party can terminate the lease with 30 days written notice to the other party. There have been no changes since the first reading held on June 24, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, Roanoke County will receive $600 annually for the lease. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Page 1 of 3 This LEASE AGREEMENT made and entered into this _____ day of __________ 2025, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, its successors and assigns, Grantor, hereinafter referred to as “Landlord” and RIDE SOURCE, Grantee, hereinafter referred to as “Tenant”. W I T N E S S E T H That for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1.Leased Premises – Landlord hereby rents and leases to Tenant, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease Agreement, the following real property, herein referred to as the “premises”, to-wit: Two (2) parking spaces across a portion of that tract or parcel of real estate located at 1204 Kessler Mill Road, Salem, Virginia, said parcel designated as Roanoke County Tax Map # 036.03-01-00.00-0000, and specifically those two (2) parking spaces shown on an Exhibit A attached hereto titled “Kessler Mill Parking.” 2.Term of Lease – The term of this Lease Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning on August 01, 2025, and terminating on August 01, 2026. Tenant shall have the option to renew this Lease Agreement for additional one (1) year lease terms by providing written notice to Landlord at least sixty (60) days before each annual termination date. The Landlord reserves the right to expand or diminish the number of leased parking spaces upon each renewal period. Either party may terminate this lease by providing thirty (30) days written notice as provided in Section 9. 3.Rent – Tenant shall pay as rent the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per month, payable each month in advance by Tenant to Landlord by the 1st of each month. 4.Permitted Uses – It is understood and agreed by the parties that the leased premises are to be used by Tenant, during the term of this lease, solely for the purpose of parking the two vehicles that provide the McAfee Knob Trailhead shuttle service. The parking spaces shall not be used to park motor vehicles for sale by Tenant and shall not be used for customer parking. Tenant shall have access to occupy and use no more than those agreed upon parking spaces at any given time. Tenant shall have access to occupy and use the parking spaces twenty-four hours a day. 5.Condition – Tenant has examined and knows the condition of the premises and accepts the same in its current condition. Tenant acknowledges that no representation as to the condition or repair of the premises thereof has been made by Landlord, except as provided for herein. The premises shall be returned to Landlord at the expiration of this lease in its current condition and state of repair, with allowance for ordinary wear and tear. Page 2 of 3 6.Limitation of Liability – Tenant agrees to hold Landlord harmless for any damages or injuries caused to any person, vehicle or any personal property left in any vehicle and hereby specifically agrees that Landlord shall not be responsible for any damage. Tenant hereby acknowledges and agrees that Landlord is not liable for any special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or relating to this Lease Agreement in any way. 7.Insurance – Tenant covenants that it shall, during the term of this Lease Agreement, keep in full force and affect a policy of general liability insurance or such comparable self-insurance as may be authorized by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia with limits of at least $1,000,000.00 for personal injury to or death of any one person and $2,000,000.00 for injury to or death of more than one person in any one occurrence and $100,000.00 for property damage. 8.Sale of Premises – Landlord may sell or otherwise dispose of the leased premises for future economic development purposes. The parties agree that in the event of such a sale that this Lease Agreement shall terminate. 9.Notices – All written notices required or permitted by this Lease Agreement may be delivered in person or shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested (postage prepaid) to Landlord or Tenant at the following addresses: Landlord: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Attn: Director of General Services, Parks, Recreation & Tourism 1216 Kessler Mill Road Salem, VA 24153 Tenant: Ride Source 1337 Hardy Road Suite 18 Vinton, VA 24179 10.Modification – This Lease Agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by the parties. 11.Governing Law – This Lease Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 12.Authority – This Lease Agreement is executed by the County Administrator of Roanoke County by authority and on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to Ordinance ___________________ adopted by said Board on the __st day of ______________ 2025. 13.Execution – This Lease Agreement shall be executed in duplicate, each of which shall constitute an original. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Page 3 of 3 RIDE SOURCE By___________________________________________________(Seal) Name: ______________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________ State of Virginia, __________ of Roanoke, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________________________ 2025, by ____________________________________________ on behalf of Ride Source, Tenant. _________________________________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: _____________________________________ Approved as to form: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY _________________________________________ By______________________________________________________ County Attorney Richard Caywood County Administrator State of Virginia, __________ of Roanoke, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________________________ 2025, by Richard Caywood, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, Landlord. _________________________________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: _____________________________________ Kessler Mill Parking X X X - Two parking spaces to be leased. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors General Services AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH RIDE SOURCE, LLC, TO LEASE TWO PARKING SPACES AT THE GENERAL SERVICES FACILITY AT 1204 KESSLER MILL ROAD, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ride Source, LLC began a contract with the County in September 2022 to provide transportation services for the McAfee Knob Trailhead Shuttle; and WHEREAS, in May 2025, Ride Source, LLC, approached County Staff with a request to park two (2) vehicles at 1204 Kessler Mill Road in Salem, Virginia, County- owned property which formerly housed the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department; and WHEREAS, the County has negotiated an agreement with Ride Source, LLC, for the lease of two (2) parking spaces for vehicles used to operate the McAfee Knob Trailhead shuttle services; and WHEREAS, § 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that the conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 24, 2025, and the second reading was held on July 8, 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That the execution of a Lease Agreement for property located at 1204 Kessler Mill Road, Salem, Virginia, as shown on Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved. 2.That the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such documents, including but not limited to the Lease Agreement (with any changes as approved by the County Attorney’s Office). 3.That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.4 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: Page 2 of 2 with the goals of: • Realigning Valleypointe Parkway with the entrance to Green Ridge Recreation Center; • Widening Valleypointe Parkway to four lanes; and • Providing sidewalk along Valleypointe Parkway from North Concourse Drive to connect to the existing sidewalk located at the intersection of Wood Haven Road and the entrance road to Green Ridge Recreation Center. The project was submitted for SMART SCALE Round 4 funding in 2020 and was included in the fiscal year 2022 Six Year Improvement Program in June 2021. VDOT began preliminary engineering in 2023. The project is currently in the right -of-way phase with construction anticipated in fiscal year 2026. DISCUSSION: VDOT contacted Roanoke County on May 30, 2025, with an offer package of $22,500 for the following components at 7415 Wood Haven Road (Green Ridge Recreation Center) along the property's Wood Haven Road frontage to facilitate the project: • Permanent easement for VDOT utilities; • Temporary easement for construction; and • Landscaping to be removed. The proposed easements and landscaping removal are not anticipated to have an impact on operations at Green Ridge Recreation Center. There have been no changes since the first reading of the ordinance on June 24, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: VDOT is offering the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors $22,500 for a permanent easement, a temporary easement and for landscaping to be removed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 731 Harrison Avenue Commissioner Salem, Virginia (540) 387-5228 May 30, 2025 Transportation Facility: Route: 1947 State Project: 1947-080-952, R201 Federal Project: STP-5128(527) County: Roanoke UPC: 119468 RIGHT OF WAY - Property of Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Parcel 010 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County PO BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Landowner: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is in the process of acquiring rights of way for the construction, maintenance and/or operation of the above referenced public transportation facility, specifically, Route 1947 in Roanoke County, Virginia. The final project plans show that your property is needed for this transportation facility, and VDOT hereby offers to acquire the property that is needed, as shown on the enclosed plan sheets. VDOT seeks to acquire your property to use for the construction, maintenance and/or operation of the referenced public transportation facility including any components thereof such as, but not limited to, storm water management systems, drainage systems, traffic control equipment, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and bike trails. If it is necessary for the construction, maintenance and/or operation of the referenced transportation facility, your property may be used for the relocation, installation, improvement or maintenance of a utility service provided by a public utility provider, or for the relocation, installation, improvement or maintenance of railroad facilities. Pursuant to Section 25.1-204(B) of the Code of Virginia, the undersigned hereby certifies that the acquisition of your property has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Highways for purposes of complying with Section 1-219.1 of the Code of Virginia. VDOT hereby offers to acquire the property and/or property rights needed, as shown on the enclosed plan sheets, for the total sum of $22,500.00. This offer is based solely upon the valuation referenced below and in the enclosed valuation report. VDOT made a study of the real estate market in your area to determine the value of the area needed. This study is the basis for our offer. After careful inspection and with full consideration of the impact of the proposed transportation facility on your property, the market value was established at $22,500.00. A breakdown of this value is as follows: Letter to The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia Page 2 May 30, 2025 Category Description Link Units Size Value Permanent Easement VDOT Utility Easement SF 5,295 12,900 Temporary Easement Temporary Construction Easement SF 4,816 5,100 Other Improvements Landscaping 4,500.00 Total Offer $ 22,500.00 Enclosed is a complete copy of the approved evaluation report and a copy of the title examination of your property. Plan Sheets 5, 5RW, 5A, 6, 6RW and 6A are enclosed showing specific features highlighted in the following colors: PINK to represent VDOT Utility Easement and ORANGE to represent Temporary Construction Easement. Other documents enclosed include a Commonwealth of Virginia Substitute W-9 form (Form W-9) that asks for your Social Security Number or Taxpayer ID and Form N28, an authorization for your mortgage company allowing us to obtain mortgage lien information on your property. This information is necessary to expedite closing and our payment to you of money owed. At your specific request, I am sending these documents to you in advance of our meeting together in person. When we meet, I will discuss the offer with you, answer any questions, and address any concerns you may have about the acquisition. A description of the areas needed are as follows: The proposed VDOT Permanent Utility easement acquisition, outlined in PINK and containing 5,295 square feet is irregular in shape. This acquisition runs approximately 200 feet along Route 628 and is approximately 32 feet into the subject property from the existing State Right of Way. The proposed Temporary Construction Easement outlined in ORANGE and containing 4,816 square feet is irregular in shape. The proposed temporary construction easement is approximately 320 feet in length along the property frontage and approximately 43 feet into the subject property from the existing State Right of Way. The easement is for construction purposes and ceases to exist when construction is complete. You may be entitled to a reimbursement or reduction of your real estate taxes, depending on the circumstances at the time the transfer is concluded. Should you have any questions pertaining to this, please contact your local treasurer for further details. Thank you for your consideration of our offer to purchase the needed rights of way. Through your cooperation, Virginia’s transportation system will remain among the nation’s finest. Sincerely, Whitney Proutey Right of Way Agent Enclosures cc: Ms. Lori A. Snider, State Right of Way & Utilities Director AP1 Rev. 09/21 BASIC ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT (BAR) RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION Project, Parcel and Ownership Information Parcel No. 010 Project No. 1947-080-952, R201 County: Roanoke Federal Project No. STP-5128(527) UPC No. 119468 Parcel Address 7415 Wood Haven Rd Parcel City, State and Zip Roanoke, VA 24019 Owner Name The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia Owner Address PO Box 29800 Owner City, State and Zip Roanoke, VA 24018 Agent Name Amy Hartman Zoning, Use and Assessment Information Tax Map # 026.18-01-15.00-0000 Assessed Land $ 1,507,600.00 Zoning I2C Industrial Assessed Improv. $ 15,637,500.00 Current Use Industrial Total Assessed Value $ 18,656,300.00 Parcel Size Before Acquisition 11.965 AC Parcel Size After Acquisition 11.965 AC ITEM UNIT SIZE UNIT VALUE % OF VALUE APPLIED ESTIMATED VALUE PERMANENT EASE (Util)SF 5295 3.48$ 70%12,900$ TEMPORARY EASEMENT SF 4816 3.48$ 30%5,100$ 0 -$ 0%-$ 0 -$ 0%-$ 0 -$ 0%-$ 0 -$ 0%-$ 18,000$ 4,500$ 22,500$ TOTAL ESTIMATED COMPENSATION ESTIMATE OF JUST COMPENSATION Value of Land and Easements Value of Improvements (List and Comment Below) Cost to Cure Items (Explanation and Calculation Below) Comments, Explanations and Calculations (e.g. if any, area of residue acquired) Utility Easement: $12,900; Temporary Easement $5,100; Landscaping: $4,500 Signatures and Date Approved for Acquisition Agent Signature Effective Date 5/21/2025 Manager Signature Date Approved for Acquisition Land prices are based on a range of values derived from property transfers in your neighborhood. AP1 1/04 Parcel: 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 2 of 6 AP1 1/04 Parcel: 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 3 of 6 AP1 1/04 Parcel: 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 4 of 6 AP1 1/04 Parcel: 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 5 of 6 AP1 1/04 Parcel: 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 6 of 6 REV. 07/2012 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORITY I, ___________________________________________, first being duly sworn, do swear or affirm that the following statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief: 1. That the property, depicted in the attached plan sheet or plat, is owned by ____________________________________, (the “Business Entity.”) 2. That I am ________________________________ of said Business Entity. 3. That I warrant and represent that by virtue of my position I have the full and unrestricted authority to execute all documents binding upon the Business Entity described and to waive or claim any rights to which it may be entitled ____________________________ (SEAL) Date: ________________________ City/County of __________________ ) State of _ ) to-wit Subscribed and sworn to before me this ______ day of _________________________________, 20__ by , its___________________________________ ________________________________ _____________________________ _________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: _____________________ Registration #: ___________________ -1- TAX MAP #026.18-01-15.00-0000 SF-39 Rev. 8/23 UPC 119468 Parcel 010 PREPARED BY VDOT UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Exempted from recordation taxes and fees under Sections 58.1-811(A)(3), 58.1-811(C)(5), 58.1-3315, 25.1-418, 42.1-70, 17.1-266, and 17.1-279(E) THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this _______ day of _________, 2025, by and between THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VA, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia its successors or assigns, Grantor, and the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Transportation, 731 Harrison Avenue, Salem, VA 24153, Grantee, WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, it is proposed by the Commonwealth to widen or improve State Highway Route 1947, Project 1947-080-952, R201, from 0.005 Miles South of Route 5088 to Route 628 in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, in the improvement it is necessary that the Grantee enter upon the lands of the Grantor located in the aforesaid county to establish and/or relocate utility facilities on the lands herein conveyed. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid by the Grantee to the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors and assigns, the perpetual right and easement, to install, construct, UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 2 - operate, maintain, inspect, improve, relocate, alter, replace or remove one or more of the following, which shall collectively be referred to as “Utility Facilities”: (a)communication systems, including, but not limited to telephone, cable television and high speed internet services, consisting of buried cables, buried wires, posts, terminals, pedestals, vaults, conduits, manholes, handholes, and related above-ground facilities including, but not limited to, cables, wires, poles, posts, terminals, location markers, cabinets, equipment housings, remote terminal units, and other appurtenances as may be from time to time required; (b)electrical systems for transmitting and distributing electric power by one or more circuits, telephone and other communications systems relating thereto, and street lighting, consisting of wires, conduits, poles, cables, transformers, transformer enclosures, concrete pads, manholes, handholes, connection boxes, accessories and appurtenances desirable in connection therewith; over, under, through, upon and across the lands and property of the Grantor adjacent to Route 1947, situated in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and including the right of reasonable egress and ingress to these Utility Facilities, said easement being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Being as shown on sheets 6, and 6RW of the plans for Route 628, Project 1947-080- 952, R201, beginning on the Northwest (left) side of the Rte. 628 Wood Haven Rd. Const. BL from a point in the lands of the Grantor opposite Station 36+02.82 to a point in the lands of the Grantor opposite approximate Station 38+10, containing 5,295 square feet in proposed utility easement, a copy of which is attached hereto to be recorded herewith in State Highway Plat Book , Page __________. Being a part of the same land acquired by the Grantor from English Construction Company, Inc., a Virginia corporation, by Deed dated March 5, 2008, and recorded on March 7, UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 3 - 2008 as Instrument Number 200803144 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. The utility easements and all utility facilities installed thereon as hereinabove described are subject to the following conditions: 1. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the respective owners of the utility facilities (“Utility Owners”) shall have full and free use of the said easement and right of way for the purposes named, and shall have all rights and privileges reasonably necessary to exercise use of the easement and right of way as their interests are set forth herein, including the right of reasonable ingress to and egress from this easement over the remaining land of Grantor by such private roads as may now or hereafter exist on the property of Grantor. The right, however, is reserved to Grantor to shift, relocate, close or abandon such private roads at any time. If there are no public or private roads reasonably convenient to the easement, then the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners shall have such right of reasonable ingress and egress over the lands of the Grantor adjacent to the easement. 2. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors and assigns, and the Utility Owners shall each conduct their operations within the easement area in a manner that does not materially interfere with or is otherwise inconsistent with the other easements, rights of way or interests in land acquired hereunder. Any material interference or inconsistency between users of any joint utility easement created hereunder that is not otherwise resolved by the text of this deed shall be resolved in favor of the entity that held, prior to the recording date of this deed, the first in UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 4 - time easement, right of way, other interest in land or occupancy of land under a claim of right or with the apparent acquiescence of the Grantor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the operations of the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns necessitate material interference with the easements, rights of way or interests of land acquired hereunder, the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns shall, in accord with applicable law, have the right and obligation to provide a replacement easement to, or pay the relocation costs of, the affected entity, to the extent necessary to resolve such interference, provided the affected entity held an easement, right of way, other interest in land or occupancy of land under a claim of right or with the apparent acquiescence of the Grantor prior to the recording date of this deed. 3. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors and assigns, and the Utility Owners shall have the right to trim, cut and remove trees, shrubbery, fences, structures, or other obstructions or facilities inside and outside the boundaries of the easement deemed to interfere with the proper and efficient use of the easement for the purposes named and/or the safe and proper operation of the utility facilities; provided, however, the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners, at their own expense, shall restore, as nearly as possible, the property to its original condition, including the back-filling of trenches, the replacement of curbing and asphalt pavement, and the reseeding of grass areas, but not the replacement of structures, trees, or other obstructions. The right to trim, cut and remove trees or shrubbery inside the boundaries of the easement shall be in accordance with each Utility Owner’s trimming specification, UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 5 - e.g., in compliance with the National Electric Safety Code; Virginia State Corporation Commission Guidelines on Tree-Trimming; the Virginia Overhead High Voltage Safety Act, Va. Code §§ 59.1-406 - 59.1-414; ANSI A-300 and ANSI Z-133. Outside the boundaries of the easement, the Utility Owners may only trim, cut and remove trees or shrubbery (including but not limited to weak, diseased and/or dead vegetation) that pose a danger to the safe and reliable operation of the utility facilities in order to eliminate the hazard. All trees and limbs cut by the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors and assigns, or the Utility Owners shall remain the property of Grantor. 4. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners shall, consistent with the purposes named, have the right to inspect, rebuild, repair, remove and relocate their respective utility facilities or any part thereof, within the easement area, and may make such changes, alterations, substitutions, additions in and to, or extensions of its facilities as it deems advisable, and consistent with the purposes named, without the prior consent of the Grantor. 5. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners shall, subject to the rights acquired herein, repair damage to roads, fences, or other improvements (a) inside the boundaries of the easement and right of way and (b) outside the boundaries of the easement caused by the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners in the process of the construction, inspection, and maintenance of facilities by the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners, or in the exercise of their right of ingress and egress, provided that Grantor gives written UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 6 - notice thereof to Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners, as appropriate, within sixty (60) days after such damage occurs. 6.The communications and electrical systems constructed hereunder are and shall remain the property of the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners. The Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners shall, consistent with the purposes named, have the right to inspect, rebuild, repair, remove and relocate their individual utility facilities or any part thereof, within the easement area, and may make such changes, alterations, substitutions, additions in and to, or extensions of their facilities as they deem advisable, and consistent with the purposes named, without the prior consent of the Grantor. In making any such changes, alterations, substitutions, additions in and to, or extensions of its utility facilities after the initial installations for the Project herein described, the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors and assigns, and the Utility Owners shall not install any above ground pole, cabinet, transformer, fence or appurtenance within any existing paved parking area or entrance way without the prior consent of the Grantor; such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Manholes, vaults, handholes and similar types of appurtenances can be installed under paved areas and sidewalks provided they are load-bearing and are set flush with the existing pavement or sidewalk. 7. The Grantor, his successors and assigns, may use the easement for any reasonable purpose not inconsistent with the rights hereby acquired , provided such use does not interfere with the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 7 - or assigns, or the Utility Owners, in their exercise of any of the rights acquired hereunder. Grantor shall not have the right to construct any building, structure, or other above-ground obstruction or to change the existing ground elevation, or to impound any water, on the easement; provided, however, Grantor may construct on the easement fences, landscaping (subject, however to the tree trimming rights in Paragraph 3 hereof), paving, sidewalks, curbing, gutters, street signs, and below-ground obstructions as long as said fences, landscaping, paving, sidewalks, curbing, gutters, street signs and below-ground obstructions do not interfere with the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners, in their exercise of any of its rights acquired hereunder. In the event such use by the Grantor does interfere with the exercise of any of the rights acquired by the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners hereunder, the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners may, in their reasonable discretion, relocate such of its utility facilities as may be practicable to a new site designated by Grantor and acceptable to the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owner. In the event any such facilities are so relocated, Grantor shall reimburse the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, or the Utility Owners for the cost thereof and convey to the Grantee, its agents, permittees, successors or assigns, and the Utility Owners an equivalent easement at the new site. UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 8 - Grantee shall have the right to assign or permit usage of this easement, or portions thereof, said assignment and usage to be only for the purposes and subject to the limitations set forth herein. The Grantor by the execution of this instrument acknowledges that the plans for the aforesaid project as they affect Grantor’s property have been fully explained to Grantor or Grantor’s authorized representative. Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of the property and has the right to convey the easement and the rights and privileges herein conveyed to Grantee and that Grantee shall have quiet and peaceable possession, use and enjoyment of the aforesaid easement and the rights and privileges hereby granted. The Grantor covenants and agrees for Grantor, Grantor’s heirs, successors and assigns that Grantor been made aware of Grantor’s right to receive just compensation for the easement herein conveyed, and that the considerations aforementioned and paid to Grantor shall be in lieu of any and all claims to compensation and damages, if any, by reason of the location, construction, operation and maintenance of the utility facilities described herein. SIGNATURE AND NOTARY CERTIFICATE ON FOLLOWING PAGE UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 9 - WITNESS the following signature and seal: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By (SEAL) Title STATE OF ______________________________ CITY/COUNTY OF _____________________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of__________, 2025, by ______________________, _______________________________, The Board of (Name) (Title) Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on behalf of the company. My Commission expires ___________ Notary Registration No.: ________________ Notary Public -1- TAX MAP #026.18-01-15.00-0000 RW-29 Revised 8/23 UPC 119468 Parcel 010 PREPARED BY VDOT UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Exempted from recordation taxes and fees under Sections 58.1-811(A)(3), 58.1-811(C)(5), 58.1-3315, 25.1-418, 42.1-70, 17.1-266, and 17.1-279(E) THIS AGREEMENT, made this _____ day of ______________ 2025, by and between THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, its successors or assigns, Grantor, and the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Transportation, 731 Harrison Avenue, Salem, VA 24153, Grantee, WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, it is proposed by the Commonwealth to widen or improve State Highway Route 1947, Project 1947-080-952, R201, from 0.005 Miles South of Route 5088 to Route 628 to Route 628 in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, in the improvement it is necessary that the Grantee enter upon the lands of the Grantor located in the aforesaid county to extend the road slopes, grading and/or other construction onto the lands, from opposite Station 34+76.82 to opposite Station 37+96.04 as shown on Sheets 5, 5RW, 6 and 6RW of the plans for the above project on file in the office of the Department of Transportation, Richmond, Virginia; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the benefits accruing or to accrue to the Grantor by reason of such improvement, and for the further consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid to the Grantor, receipt of which is hereby UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 2 - acknowledged, the Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee the temporary right and easement to use the areas from opposite Station 34+76.82 to opposite Station 37+96.04, containing 4,816 square feet, more or less, and as shown outlined in ORANGE on a photocopy of Sheets 5, 5RW, 6, and 6RW for the proper execution of the work, which photocopies are hereto attached as a part hereof and recorded simultaneously herewith in the State Highway Plat Book ________, Page ________. This temporary easement will terminate at such time as the construction of the project is completed. Being a part of the same land acquired by the Grantor from English Construction Company, Inc., a Virginia corporation, by Deed dated March 5, 2008, and recorded on March 7, 2008 as Instrument Number 200803144 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION: $22,500.00 in full for temporary construction easement, VDOT permanent utility easement, any and all appurtenances thereon, any and all damages. The Grantor by the execution of this instrument acknowledges that the plans for the project as they affect Grantor’s property have been fully explained to Grantor or Grantor’s authorized representative. The Grantor covenants and agrees that the consideration mentioned above and paid to Grantor shall be in lieu of any and all claims to compensation, including all costs to cure and all incurable damages to the value of the Grantor’s remaining property caused by this acquisition, if any. SIGNATURE AND NOTARY CERTIFICATE ON FOLLOWING PAGE UPC 119468 Parcel 010 - 3 - WITNESS the following signature and seal: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By (SEAL) Title STATE OF ______________________________ CITY/COUNTY OF _____________________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of__________, 2025, by ______________________, _______________________________, The Board of (Name) (Title) Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on behalf of the company. My Commission expires ___________ Notary Registration No.: ________________ Notary Public N28 Project No.1947-080-952, R201 UPC No. 119468 Parcel No. 010 Landowner: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Property Address: 7415 Wood Haven Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019 Landowner Address: PO Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 Name of Bank/Mortgage Co.: Property Address: Property Owner(s)/Mortgagee(s): Loan No.: Lender’s Mailing Address: Contact Person at Lender: Phone No.: Are you currently in bankruptcy? (Circle one) Yes No To Whom It May Concern: The above-described property is currently encumbered by an existing mortgage that is held by your institution. We, the undersigned property owners, hereby authorize the Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”) and its employees to seek, obtain and review any and all information in your possession or under your control pertaining to the above referenced mortgage. Please consider this letter as our official request and authorization for you to disclose and provide all requested information (including copies) concerning this mortgage transaction to VDOT as they may request. Copies of this authorization shall be valid as if an original. SIGNATURE AND NOTARY CERTIFICATE ON FOLLOWING PAGE N28 WITNESS the following signature and seal: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia By (SEAL) Title STATE OF ______________________________ CITY/COUNTY OF _____________________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2025, by ______________________, _______________________________ (Name) (Title) The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on behalf of the company. My Commission expires ___ __________ Notary Registration No.: __________________ Notary Public RIGHT OF WAY SURVEY FORM Pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related nondiscrimination authorities, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) collects responses to the questions below in order to ascertain the general composition of communities affected by right of way acquisition on highway construction projects. Disclosure of this information is strictly voluntary and anonymous. Project Number: 1947-080-952, R201 UPC: 119468 1. Please check the block(s) for the racial or ethnic group with which you identify: White/Caucasian Black/African-American Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Indian Other _______________________________ 2. Please indicate your sex: Male Female 3. Please check the appropriate age group(s): 18-25 26-39 40-65 Over 65 4. Please indicate the number of individuals living in this household: 1-2 3-4 5 and above 5. Please indicate your average annual household income: Under $10,000 $10,000 - $30,000 Over $30,000 6. Are you limited English proficient? Yes No 7. If this is a business, please indicate the ethnicity/race of board: Woman owned Minority owned All other owned Not a business 8257 1257.45 FNC E 8257 1257.45 FNC E 010 002 For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement REFERENCES ( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. ) BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. d11946805.dgn Plotted By: BHENDRIC9:59:30 PM 5/6/2025 PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE PROJECT MANAGER 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 1947-080-952 HYDRAULIC ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia Mattern & Craig ROADWAY ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia HDR Engineering, Inc. THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. R/W PLANS DENOTES MILLING AND RESURFACING DENOTES DEMOLITION OF PAVEMENT DENOTES PROPOSED ASPHALT 1 6 4 5 St'd. CG-6 Req'd. St'd. Radial CG-6 Req'd. St'd. CG-12 Type B Req'd. Saw Cut Full Depth Req'd. Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts Denotes Construction Limits in Fills C F Dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements. Dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.Note: DENOTES PROPOSED SIDEWALK Plug and Abandon Existing Drainage Structure Remove Existing DraInage Structure A R Clean Out Existing Drainage StructureC 7 Proposed 5' Sidewalk St'd. Radial CG-2 Req'd. St'd. CG-2 Req'd.2 3 0 SCALE 25'50' 5 5 Wood Haven XS E&S Control Plan Drainage Description Entrance Profile Mainline Profile X021-X026 5C 3B 8 5A MATCH LINE STA. 35+50 SEE SHEET 6 8 Remove Existing Guardrail 4/23/2025 D(1) (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) Wood Haven Rd. Asphalt Guardrail Guardrail Metal Sign Metal Sign Me t a l S i g n Metal Water Tank Rip=Rap 8' Chain Link Fence Pines Me t a l S i g n Me t a l S i g n Me t a l S i g n 2 - Sty. Br. Dwl. #7414 Conc. Patio Planter Planter 1 - Sty. Br. Dwl./Bmt. #7406 Conc. Walk Wooden Deck Conc. Patio 12" Stone Wall 12" Stone Wall Barbed Wire Fence Small Hardwoods And Brush Small Hardwoods And Brush Small Hardwoods And Brush Planter Conc. Walk Me t a l S i g n Me t a l S i g n Me t a l S i g n (7) 0 25'50' Conc. Ditch GrassGrass Grass Hardwoods And Mixed Brush Hardwoods And Mixed Brush 6" Dogwood Asphalt Asphalt Grass Grass Grass Grass Asphalt 8' Chain Link Fence 6" Maple 6" Maple Asphalt Broken Conc. Broken Conc. 4' Woven And Barbed Wire Fence D D 4" PVC Outfall From Po o l D r a i n s With Valve Box Inv. Out= 1245. 24' 4" PVC Outfall From Po o l D r a i n s With Valve Box Inv. Out= 1247. 94' Conc. Ent. Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And DB 983 PG 579 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200708598 Ip Ip Ip Ip Ip ( N 39°53'21" W ( N 39°53'21" W ( S 68°35'40" W ( S 66°57'29" W ( N 40°01'11" W ( N 38°23'00" W ( N 38°23'00" W ( N 35°19'58" W ( N 40°01'11" W ( S 39°29'50" E ( S 40°57'27" E ( S 36°19'58" E 635. 39' ) 671. 64' ) 223. 18' ) 222. 13' ) 207. 57' ) 207. 57' )346. 92' ) 347. 87' ) 50. 00' ) 40. 00' ) 41. 62' ) Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200803143 [80-0002] WM AEP No # WM WM WM AEP No # AEP #181-23 AEP #181-2251 E EE E No # VZN #27 Pole Cut (RVB) S S Inv. Out = 1245.97' No # No # No # (RVB)(RVB)(RVB) AEP #181-7699 FO1 E2 E3 TV1 E1 E4 E4 E4 E5 TV1 E1 FO1 E1 W1 TV1 FO1 T W AEP #181-2237 FO3 S3 S3 G3 T2 T1 W1 G3 T1 T2 AEP #181-323 T2 In Pl. SMH Rim = 1253.39' Inv. In = 1244.09' Inv. In (6") = 1244.11' Inv. Out =1244.09' In P l . S M H Rim = 1253.62' Inv. In = 1245.10' Inv. Out = 1245.15' Tax Map # 026.18-01-06.00 DB 1663 PG 1295 (Parcel 5) 2. 52 AC Tax Map # 026.18-01-04.00 3. 834 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 2) Instr.# 200906027 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.18-01-05.00 0. 54 AC Instr.# 201905734 DB 985 PG 577 (PLAT) Instr.# 200803144 Tax Map # 026.18-01-15.00 11.965 AC Tax Map # 026.18-01-04.00 3. 834 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 2) Instr.# 200906027 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-59.00 0. 91 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 7) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-58.00 1. 46 Acres Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 6) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) WM AEP No # WM WM WM AEP No # AEP #181-23 AEP #181-2251 E EE E No # VZN #27 Pole Cut (RVB) S S Inv. Out = 1245.97' No # No # No # (RVB)(RVB)(RVB) AEP #181-7699 FO1 E2 E3 TV1 E1 E4 E4 E4 E5 TV1 E1 FO1 E1 W1 TV1 FO1 T W AEP #181-2237 FO3 S3 S3 G3 T2 T1 W1 G3 T1 T2 AEP #181-323 T2 In Pl. SMH Rim = 1253.39' Inv. In = 1244.09' Inv. In (6") = 1244.11' Inv. Out =1244.09' In P l . S M H Rim = 1253.62' Inv. In = 1245.10' Inv. Out = 1245.15' RVP DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ENGLISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC.ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF DAYLIGHT WITH PROPOSED GRADE MODIFY EXIST. 4" PVC POOL DRAIN TO 1 1 Wood Haven Road Constr. BL PI = 32+59.24 DELTA = 04°51'56.22" (LT) D = 01°24'47" T = 172.28' L = 344.35' R = 4,055.00' PC = 30+86.96 PT = 34+31.31 e = Match Existing V = 35 MPH STA. 32+01.99 BEGIN MILLING AND RESURFACING BEGIN CONSTRUCTION Existing R/W R/W Existing Sta. 34+51.58 Taper Channelizing Begin Sta. 32+01.99 Taper End Channelizing (Route 626) To Thirlane Rd. C C Rte. 628 Wood Haven Rd. N64°12'51"E Sta. 35+ 51.00 Begin 100' Taper N69°04'48"E 30+ 86.96 PC 34+ 31.31 PT 32+ 59.24 PI 30 31 32 33 34 35 30+ 00.00 PO T d119468pro.dgn Plotted By: BHENDRIC1:12:42 PM 2/19/2025 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT PROJECT SHEET NO. SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 Cell Revised 12/11/12 BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) PROJECT MANAGER HYDRAULIC ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia Mattern & Craig 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 ROADWAY ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia HDR Engineering, Inc. 1947-080-952 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. R/W PLANS 1200 1200 1205 1205 1210 1210 1215 1215 1220 1220 1225 1225 1230 1230 1235 1235 1240 1240 1245 1245 1250 1250 1255 1255 1260 1260 1265 1265 1270 1270 1275 1275 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 Ground Existing STA. 32+01.99 BEGIN CONSTR. / BEGIN MILLING AND RESURFACING Milling and Resurfacing Match Existing St a . 3 2 + 0 1 . 9 9 Spline Grade 12 4 6 . 0 6 12 4 6 . 4 0 12 4 6 . 7 7 12 4 7 . 2 5 12 4 7 . 8 2 12 4 8 . 4 7 12 4 9 . 1 9 12 4 9 . 8 6 12 5 0 . 5 2 12 5 1 . 2 5 12 5 2 . 0 0 12 5 2 . 7 5 12 5 3 . 5 2 12 5 4 . 3 6 12 4 5 . 7 4 12 4 6 . 0 6 12 4 6 . 4 0 12 4 6 . 7 7 12 4 7 . 2 5 12 4 7 . 8 2 12 4 8 . 4 7 12 4 9 . 1 9 12 4 9 . 8 6 12 5 0 . 5 2 12 5 1 . 2 5 12 5 2 . 0 0 12 5 2 . 7 5 12 5 3 . 5 2 12 5 4 . 3 6 +1.14%+1.27%+1.37%+1.47%+1.94%+2.27%+2.59%+2.88%+2.70%+2.64%+2.93%+2.99%+2.99%+3.09%+3.35% 12 4 3 . 5 7 12 4 3 . 8 1 12 4 4 . 0 5 12 4 4 . 3 6 12 4 4 . 6 7 12 4 4 . 9 4 12 4 5 . 1 9 12 4 5 . 4 5 12 4 5 . 7 4 12 4 6 . 0 6 12 4 6 . 4 0 12 4 6 . 7 7 12 4 7 . 2 5 12 4 7 . 8 2 12 4 8 . 4 7 12 4 9 . 1 9 12 4 9 . 8 6 12 5 0 . 5 2 12 5 1 . 2 5 12 5 2 . 0 0 12 5 2 . 7 5 12 5 3 . 5 2 12 5 4 . 3 6 5A 5A MA T C H L I N E S T A . 3 5 + 5 0 S E E S H E E T 6 A ( 1 ) WOOD HAVEN ROAD 010 002 50.81' +76.82 37.91' +89.48 49.85' +92.48 For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And DB 983 PG 579 Ip Ip Ip Ip ( N 39°53'21" W ( N 39°53'21" W ( S 68°35'40" W ( S 66°57'29" W ( N 40°01'11" W ( N 38°23'00" W ( N 38°23'00" W ( N 35°19'58" W ( N 40°01'11" W ( S 39°29'50" E ( S 40°57'27" E ( S 36°19'58" E 635. 39' ) 671. 64' ) 223. 18' ) 222. 13' ) 207. 57' ) 207. 57' )346. 92' ) 347. 87' ) 50. 00' ) 40. 00' ) 41. 62' ) Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200803143 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200708598 56.74' +77.78 42.76' +20.86 43.33' +47.62 42.84' +20.83 Tax Map # 026.18-01-06.00 DB 1663 PG 1295 (Parcel 5) 2. 52 AC Tax Map # 026.18-01-04.00 3. 834 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 2) Instr.# 200906027 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.18-01-05.00 0. 54 AC Instr.# 201905734 DB 985 PG 577 (PLAT) Instr.# 200803144 Tax Map # 026.18-01-15.00 11.965 AC Tax Map # 026.18-01-04.00 3. 834 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 2) Instr.# 200906027 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-59.00 0. 91 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 7) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-58.00 1. 46 Acres Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 6) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) N 69°04'48" E PI = 32+59.24 DELTA = 04°51'56.22" (LT) D = 01°24'47" T = 172.28' L = 344.35' R = 4,055.00' PC = 30+86.96 PT = 34+31.31 PC 30+86.96 PT 34+31.31 POT 30+00.00 31 32 33 34 35 N 64°12'51" E PARCEL 002 (026.19-01-58.00) Proposed Right-Of-Way Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Easement For Grading 010 1, 889 SF 4, 816 SF 5, 295 SF Rte. 628 Wood Haven Rd. Const. BL (N=3649910. 296) (E=11049700. 589) N=3649512. 170 E=11048495. 308 (N=3650129. 434) (E=11050204. 734) N=3649731. 285 E=11048999. 399 Tax Map # BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. r11946805rw.dgn Plotted By: rshelor3:38:05 PM 4/23/2025 PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE PROJECT MANAGER 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 1947-080-952 0 SCALE 25'50' 5RW 5RW MATCH LINE STA. 35+50 SEE SHEET 6RW Off Of The Valleypointe Parkway Constr. BL Shown Hereon. 8. All Proposed Easement Offset/Stations & Existing Monumentation Station/Offsets Are Based 7. This Plan Sheet (5RW) Represents The Easement Computations for Parcels 004 And 010. Does Not Preclude Their Existence. 6. No Cemetery Sites Were Observed On The Subject Properties Shown On This Plan Sheet. This 5. Survey Datum Based On VDOT Project 1947-080-952, RW-201, M-501. 4. Proposed Easements Are Derived From Design Files Provided By VDOT. The Properties Shown Hereon. 3. This Compiled Plan Sheet Was Assembled Without The Benefit Of Title Reports Which May Affect Boundary Survey. Limited Field Measurements. This Compiled Map Of Record Parcels Does Not Represent A 2. The Property Line Information Shown On This Plan Sheet Is Compiled From Record Data And On Compiled Data. All Areas Shown For Easements Are Approximate Only. Do Not Represent A Field Run Survey of The Adjoining Properties And Are A Best Fit Based Field Monumentation, Metes And Bounds Descriptions, And Recorded Plats. The Adjoining Lines OtherAdjoining/Departing Boundary Lines Shown Are Compiled From Various Sources, Found 1. This Right Of Way Sheet Represents A Field Run Perimeter Survey Of The Proposed Limits. All General Notes: LICENSED SURVEYOR Blacksburg, Virginia HURT AND PROFFITT CHRISTOPHER B. KAKNIS ROYEVRUSDNAL AINIGRIVFOHTLAEWNOMMOC No.2359Lic. EASEMENT PROP. TEMP. Utility Easement Temp. Constr. Easement & Temp. Figures In Parenthesis And Dot - Dot - Dashed Lines Denote 00.00' +00.00 Temporary Property Corner Temp. Easement Construction Esmt. Const. South Zone Coordinate VA State Plane, VDOT Project Coordinate E=10000000. 000 N=3000000. 000 (E=2000000. 000) (N=400000. 000) EASEMENT PROP. UTILITY Utility Easement Figures In Double Brackets And Dot - Dashed Lines Denote +00.00 00.00' Proposed Right Of Way Prop. R/W Proposed Right-Of-Way Monument (RM-2) RM-2 With Cap Set 5/8" Iron Rod Exist. R/W Denote Existing Right of Way Figures And Dashed Lines 00.00' +00.00 BaselineB Prop. R/W00.00' +00.00 Denote Proposed Right of Way Figures And Continuous Lines I. P. L 04/23/25 RVP DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ENGLISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC.ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 12 " C h e r r y 6" O a k 6" O a k 6" O a k 8" O a k (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21)(22) (47) 4" Ornamental Trees (x4) 4" Ornamental Tree (x9) Asphalt Small Hardwoods Small Hardwoods And Brush 0.5 Conc Curb 0.5 Conc Curb 0.5 Conc Curb 2.5 Conc. C&G 0.5 Conc Curb 2.5 Conc. C&G 2.5 Conc. C&G 0.5 Conc Curb 0.5 Conc Curb Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign Landscaped Sign "Green Ridge Recreation Center" Planter Conc. Walk Conc. Walk Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign Metal Sign BrushGrass Grass Grass Asphalt Asphalt Small Hardwoods And Brush Metal Sign (48)(49) Metal Sign Rte. 1947 "Valleypointe Parkway" Rte. 1542 "Poindexter Lane" Rte. 628 "Wood Haven Road" Grass Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Grass4" M a p l e 6" M a p l e 6" M a p l e 6" M a p l e Asphalt Grass Asphalt Asphalt So i l Metal Sign CURVE DELTA LENGTH RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING C1 36°14'57"411.23 650.00 404.41 S 05°11'23" E Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200803143 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200803143 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200708598 Ip Ip Existing R/W Per Inst.# 200708598 Existing R/W Per Inst.# 200805931 ( S 39°53' E ( S 41°48'28" E 438. 82' ) 438. 02' ) 154. 78' ) 34. 84' ) ( N 20°26'48" E ( N 23°18'51" W C1 Ingress/Egress Easement Over Existing Road For Tax Map 026. 18-01-15. 01 Area Of Overlap Between Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200805931 Area Of Overlap Between Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And DB 759 PG 498 Existing Permanent Utility Easement Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 Existing Permanent Utility Easement Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 BM " B " Chiseled Square In Conc. Elev=1257. 73' 002 010 011 006 006 008 Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed VDOT Utility Easement For Grading Easement Temporary Proposed R/W Proposed For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement Proposed R/W DENOTES MILLING AND RESURFACING DENOTES DEMOLITION OF PAVEMENT DENOTES PROPOSED ASPHALT 1 6 4 5 St'd. CG-6 Req'd. St'd. Radial CG-6 Req'd. St'd. CG-12 Type B Req'd. Saw Cut Full Depth Req'd. Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts Denotes Construction Limits in Fills C F Dot - dashed lines denote Permanent Easements. Dot - dot - dashed lines denote Temporary Easements.Note: DENOTES PROPOSED SIDEWALK Plug and Abandon Existing Drainage Structure Remove Existing DraInage Structure A R Clean Out Existing Drainage StructureC 7 Proposed 5' Sidewalk St'd. Radial CG-2 Req'd. St'd. CG-2 Req'd.2 3 6 6 0 SCALE 25'50' Wood Haven XS Valleypointe XS E&S Control Plan Drainage Description Valleypointe Profile Wood Haven Profile X026-X034 X017-X020 6C 3B 6A(2) 6A(1) MA T C H L I N E S T A . 4 1 + 5 0 S E E S H E E T 7 MATCH LINE STA. 18+00 SEE SHEET 4 MATCH LINE STA. 35+50 SEE SHEET 5 8 Remove Existing Guardrail PE-101 (REF. NO.) LOCATION PARKWAY VALLEYPOINTE ROAD WOOD HAVEN LENGTH RADIUS LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CURVE SHEET - ITEM STATION FEET FEET FEETOFFSETSTATIONOFFSET 6-1 19+15.42 24.00' Rt 39+00.05 12.80' Rt 50.00 70.28 77.94 6-2 19+02.42 24.00' Lt 37+51.90 24.00' Rt 50.00 71.14 79.15 RADIAL OFFSETS 4/23/2025 T AEP #181-2515 F RVB Marker No # F TV T VZ N # 2 4 WM F CRN Marker No # AEP #181-26 VZN #23 AEP #181-7687 AEP #181-7688 (CRN) (CRN) (CRN) (CRN) S S T AEP No # VZN #SS RVB Marker No # In Pl. SMHRim = 1257.90' Inv. In = 1241.40' Inv. Out =1241.20' In P l . S M H Rim = 1260.06' Inv. In = 1242.66' Inv. Out =1242.66' (CRN) VZN #F7393 AE P N o # VZN #22 1/2 (RVB) (RVB) TV1 E2 TV2 E1 FO2 G2 E1 FO2 G1 FO2 W3 FO1 S1 W2 E1 VZN No # VZN #1 TV4 E2 T1 G3 S10 WM Air Vent Rim = 1254.14' Instr.# 201501254 Tax Map # 026.15-01-01.00 Tax Map # 026.19-01-33.00 178.106 AC 1. 75 AC DB 1551 PG 1040 DB 939 PG 308 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-55.00 0. 37 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 5) Instr.# 200805931 (PLAT) Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 6) Tax Map # 026.19-01-58.00 1. 46 Acres Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 6) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) Instr.# 200803144 Tax Map # 026.18-01-15.00 11.965 AC Tax Map # 026.19-01-54.00 1. 08 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 5) Instr.# 200805931 (PLAT) Instr.# 201603844 Tax Map # 026.19-01-53.00 0.99 AC T AEP #181-2515 F RVB Marker No # F TV T VZ N # 2 4 WM F CRN Marker No # AEP #181-26 VZN #23 AEP #181-7687 AEP #181-7688 (CRN) (CRN) (CRN) (CRN) S S T AEP No # VZN #SS RVB Marker No # In Pl. SMHRim = 1257.90' Inv. In = 1241.40' Inv. Out =1241.20' In P l . S M H Rim = 1260.06' Inv. In = 1242.66' Inv. Out =1242.66' (CRN) VZN #F7393 AE P N o # VZN #22 1/2 (RVB) (RVB) TV1 E2 TV2 E1 FO2 G2 E1 FO2 G1 FO2 W3 FO1 S1 W2 E1 VZN No # VZN #1 TV4 E2 T1 G3 S10 WM Air Vent Rim = 1254.14' ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THELMA D. GOBBLE GEORGE R. GOBBLE & ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. RODNEY T. MALONE TRUSTEE ENGLISH HOLDING ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ROLAND H. MALONE SR., LIVING TRUST RODNEY T. MALONE TRUSTEE 6-1 15" 15" 15" 15 " 6-3 15" 6-2 6-5 6-4 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 2 2 LValleypointe Parkway Constr. B LWood Haven Road Constr. B Δ = 90° 41' 45" Rt. P.O.T. 19+77.32 Valleypointe Parkway Constr. BL P.O.T 38+26.80 Wood Haven Road Const. BL = Existing R/W Existing R/W Existing R/W R/W Existing Existing R/W R/W Existing STA. 19+67.52 END CONSTR./ END PROJ. 1947-080-952, M-501, PE-101, RW-201 Sta. 41+00.05 Taper End Channelizing C F C C F C F C F C Rte. 1542 Poindexter Ln. Curve 6-2 R=50' Curve 6-1 R=50' R RRRR C C R N25°05'23"W N64°12'51"E F C to Sta. 19+40 Approx. Sta. 13+40 roadbed. Obscure existing St a . 3 5 + 5 1 . 0 0 Be g i n 1 0 0 ' T a p e r St a . 3 6 + 5 1 . 0 0 En d 1 0 0 ' T a p e r Be g i n 1 0 0 ' S t o r a g e St a . 3 7 + 5 1 . 0 0 En d 1 0 0 ' S t o r a g e St a . 4 1 + 0 0 . 0 5 Be g i n 1 0 0 ' T a p e r St a . 4 0 + 0 0 . 0 5 En d 1 0 0 ' T a p e r Be g i n 1 0 0 ' S t o r a g e St a . 3 9 + 0 0 . 0 5 En d 1 0 0 ' S t o r a g e N64°12'51"E 36 37 38 39 40 41 18 19 19+77.32POT C F CF F C REFERENCES ( PROFILES, DETAIL & DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION SHEETS, ETC. ) BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. d11946806.dgn Plotted By: BHENDRIC9:59:55 PM 5/6/2025 PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE PROJECT MANAGER 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 1947-080-952 HYDRAULIC ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia Mattern & Craig ROADWAY ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia HDR Engineering, Inc. THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. R/W PLANS d119468pro.dgn Plotted By: BHENDRIC1:13:51 PM 2/19/2025 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT PROJECT SHEET NO. SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 Cell Revised 12/11/12 BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) PROJECT MANAGER HYDRAULIC ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia Mattern & Craig 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 ROADWAY ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia HDR Engineering, Inc. 1947-080-952 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. R/W PLANS 1215 1215 1220 1220 1225 1225 1230 1230 1235 1235 1240 1240 1245 1245 1250 1250 1255 1255 1260 1260 1265 1265 1270 1270 1275 1275 1280 1280 1285 1285 1290 1290 1295 1295 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 Ground Existing STA. 38+26.80 BASELINE VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY INTERSECTION WITH Milling and Resurfacing Match Existing Spline Grade 12 5 4 . 3 6 12 5 5 . 2 0 12 5 6 . 0 5 12 5 6 . 8 8 12 5 7 . 7 1 12 5 8 . 5 3 12 5 9 . 3 5 12 6 0 . 1 5 12 6 0 . 9 4 12 6 1 . 6 9 12 6 2 . 4 4 12 6 3 . 2 8 12 6 4 . 2 2 12 6 5 . 1 5 12 6 6 . 1 9 12 6 7 . 3 2 12 6 8 . 4 2 12 6 9 . 5 2 12 7 0 . 6 5 12 7 1 . 8 1 12 7 2 . 9 5 12 7 3 . 9 5 12 7 4 . 9 4 12 7 5 . 8 6 12 7 6 . 7 9 12 5 4 . 3 6 12 5 5 . 2 0 12 5 6 . 0 5 12 5 6 . 8 8 12 5 7 . 7 1 12 5 8 . 5 3 12 5 9 . 3 5 12 6 0 . 1 5 12 6 0 . 9 4 12 6 1 . 6 9 12 6 2 . 4 4 12 6 3 . 2 8 12 6 4 . 2 2 12 6 5 . 1 5 12 6 6 . 1 9 12 6 7 . 3 2 12 6 8 . 4 2 12 6 9 . 5 2 12 7 0 . 6 5 12 7 1 . 8 1 12 7 2 . 9 5 12 7 3 . 9 5 12 7 4 . 9 4 12 7 5 . 8 6 12 7 6 . 7 9 +3.35%+3.35%+3.41%+3.32%+3.32%+3.30%+3.28%+3.21%+3.12%+3.00%+3.00%+3.38%+3.73%+3.74%+4.17%+4.51%+4.40%+4.41%+4.54%+4.61%+4.59%+3.97%+3.99%+3.66%+3.74%+3.74% 12 5 4 . 3 6 12 5 5 . 2 0 12 5 6 . 0 5 12 5 6 . 8 8 12 5 7 . 7 1 12 5 8 . 5 3 12 5 9 . 3 5 12 6 0 . 1 5 12 6 0 . 9 4 12 6 1 . 6 9 12 6 2 . 4 4 12 6 3 . 2 8 12 6 4 . 2 2 12 6 5 . 1 5 12 6 6 . 1 9 12 6 7 . 3 2 12 6 8 . 4 2 12 6 9 . 5 2 12 7 0 . 6 5 12 7 1 . 8 1 12 7 2 . 9 5 12 7 3 . 9 5 12 7 4 . 9 4 12 7 5 . 8 6 12 7 6 . 7 9 6A(1) 6A(1) MA T C H L I N E S T A . 4 1 + 5 0 S E E S H E E T 7 A MA T C H L I N E S T A . 3 5 + 5 0 S E E S H E E T 5 A WOOD HAVEN ROAD d119468pro.dgn Plotted By: BHENDRIC1:13:52 PM 2/19/2025 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT PROJECT SHEET NO. SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 Cell Revised 12/11/12 BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) PROJECT MANAGER HYDRAULIC ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia Mattern & Craig 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 ROADWAY ENGINEER Roanoke, Virginia HDR Engineering, Inc. 1947-080-952 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 THESE PLANS ARE UNFINISHED AND UNAPPROVED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. R/W PLANS 1210 1210 1215 1215 1220 1220 1225 1225 1230 1230 1235 1235 1240 1240 1245 1245 1250 1250 1255 1255 1260 1260 1265 1265 1270 1270 1275 1275 1280 1280 1285 1285 1290 1290 1295 1295 1300 1300 18+00 19+00 Proposed Grade Ground Existing STA. 19+77.32 WOOD HAVEN ROAD BASELINE INTERSECTION WITH Sta. 19+67.52 Tie to Wood Haven Road St a . 1 9 + 6 7 . 5 2 H a v e n R o a d Ma t c h W o o d St a . 1 9 + 0 0 . 0 0 LT=-2.00% RT=3.71% LT=-4.08% STA. 19+67.52 1947-080-952, PE-101, M-501, RW-201 END CONSTR. / END PROJ. 12 5 3 . 5 2 12 5 4 . 2 6 12 5 6 . 6 9 12 5 9 . 5 5 12 6 1 . 1 1 12 6 1 . 8 1 12 6 2 . 3 5 12 6 3 . 2 9 +3.73%+2.35% ex = ___ft V = 40 MPH 401.68ftSD = 144.10L = 44K = 1,259.32EL = 18+65.38STA = 12 5 4 . 7 3 12 5 6 . 3 7 12 5 7 . 8 7 12 5 9 . 2 3 12 6 0 . 4 5 12 6 1 . 5 2 12 6 2 . 4 7 12 6 3 . 3 0 6A(2) 6A(2) MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 8 + 0 0 S E E S H E E T 4 A VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY PE-101 002 010 011 006 006 008 50.81' +46.04 80.49' +46.04 80.49' +96.04 37.58' +96.04 47.74' +15.61 52.63' +89.09 57.63' +89.09 52.63' +89.09 37.63' +89.09 24.60' +21.93 34.61' +21.84 34.83' +08.74 24.43' +31.93 44.44' +31.76 44.79' +11.60 78.98' +51.87 64.36' +25.89 46.39' +89.02 50.89' +31.65 Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed VDOT Utility Easement 37.48' +03.91 67.33' +02.82 24.23' +43.33 54.05' +21.23 For Grading Easement Temporary Proposed R/W Proposed For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Easement Proposed Temporary For Grading Proposed Temporary Easement Proposed R/W (VP B)L (VP B)L 44.44' +65.64 CHORD BEARING 36°14'57"411.23 650.00 404.41 S 05°11'23" E Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200803143 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200803143 Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0081-080-001 And Inst.# 200708598 Ip Existing R/W Per Inst.# 200805931 Existing R/W Per PB 939 PG 308 ( S 39°53' E ( S 41°48'28" E 438. 82' ) 438. 02' ) 154. 78' ) ( N 20°26'48" E ( N 23°18'51" W Ingress/Egress Easement Over Existing Road For Tax Map 026. 18-01-15. 01 Area Of Overlap Between Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And Inst.# 200805931 Area Of Overlap Between Existing R/W Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 And DB 759 PG 498 Existing Permanent Utility Easement Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 Existing Permanent Utility Easement Per VDOT Proj. 0628-080-232 ( S 39°25' E 835. 0' ) 34. 84' ) 37 . 7 7 ' +8 2 . 4 7 Instr.# 201501254 Tax Map # 026.15-01-01.00 Tax Map # 026.19-01-33.00 178.106 AC 1. 75 AC DB 1551 PG 1040 DB 939 PG 308 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-58.00 1. 46 Acres Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 6) Instr.# 200708598 (PLAT) Instr.# 200803144 Tax Map # 026.18-01-15.00 11.965 AC Instr.# 201603844 Tax Map # 026.19-01-53.00 0.99 AC Tax Map # 026.19-01-55.00 0. 37 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 5) Instr.# 200805931 (PLAT) Tax Map # 026.19-01-54.00 1. 08 AC Instr.# 201501254 (Tract 5) Instr.# 200805931 (PLAT) N 64°12'51" E 36 37 38 39 40 41 N 25°05'23" W 18 19 18 41 + 5 0 41 + 5 0 PA R C E L 002 (026.19-01-58.00) Proposed Right-Of-Way Proposed VDOT Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Easement For Grading 006 (026.19-01-54.00) 008 006 (026.19-01-55.00) 010 011 1, 889 SF 10, 312 SF 14, 819 SF 15, 390 SF 146 SF 316 SF 584 SF 16, 135 SF 4, 816 SF 5, 295 SF 4, 517 AF 3, 959 AF 20 1 . 5 3 42.87 33.62 13.11 10.00 15.00 76.99 230.24 N 25°47'9" W N 70°19'18" E N 64°34'24" E S 25°17'53" E S 63°13'9" W S 44°17'38" W S 19°3'57" E S 26°2'31" E L3 L4 L5 L3 L4 L5 END PROJ. 1947-080-952, M-501, PE-101, RW-201 STA. 19+67.52 Rte. 628 Wood Haven Rd. Const. BL P.O.T 38+26.80 Wood Haven Road Const. BL = P.O.T. 19+77.32 Valleypointe Parkway Constr. BL = 90° 41' 45" Rt. (N=3650129. 434) (E=11050204. 734) (N=3650089. 254) (E=11050529. 164) N=3649691. 110 E=11049323. 793 N=3649731. 285 E=11048999. 399 (N=3650390. 438) (E=11050744. 990) N=3649992. 260 E=11049539. 596 8, 171 SF Valleypointe Parkway Const. BL BRIAN HENDRICKS, P.E., (540) 278-2400 (HDR ENGINEERING, INC.) GARY CAMPBELL, P.E., (757) 499-1895 (JMT, INC.), 11/10/2022 CHRIS HARRAH, L.S. (540) 387-5395 (SALEM DISTRICT) CHRIS KAKNIS, L.S. (540) 552-5592 (HURT & PROFFITT, INC.) 10/12/2022 VA. STATE ROUTE PROJECT VA. REVISED STATE STATE ROUTE PROJECT SHEET NO. r11946806rw.dgn Plotted By: rshelor3:41:12 PM 4/23/2025 PROJECT SHEET NO. DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT SURVEYED BY, DATE DESIGN BY SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE PROJECT MANAGER 1947 M-501 1947-080-952, RW-201 1947-080-952 6RW 6RW 0 SCALE 25'50' MA T C H L I N E S T A . 4 1 + 5 0 S E E S H E E T 7 R W MATCH LINE STA. 18+00 SEE SHEET 4RW MATCH LINE STA. 35+50 SEE SHEET 5RW PE-101 EASEMENT PROP. TEMP. Utility Easement Temp. Constr. Easement & Temp. Figures In Parenthesis And Dot - Dot - Dashed Lines Denote 00.00' +00.00 Temporary Property Corner Temp. Easement Construction Esmt. Const. South Zone Coordinate VA State Plane, VDOT Project Coordinate E=10000000. 000 N=3000000. 000 (E=2000000. 000) (N=400000. 000) EASEMENT PROP. UTILITY Utility Easement Figures In Double Brackets And Dot - Dashed Lines Denote +00.00 00.00' Proposed Right Of Way Prop. R/W Proposed Right-Of-Way Monument (RM-2) RM-2 With Cap Set 5/8" Iron Rod Exist. R/W Denote Existing Right of Way Figures And Dashed Lines 00.00' +00.00 BaselineBL Prop. R/W00.00' +00.00 Denote Proposed Right of Way Figures And Continuous Lines I. P. Rte. 628 Wood Haven Rd. Contr. BL Shown Hereon. 8. All Proposed Easement Offset/Stations & Existing Monumentation Station/Offsets Are Based Off Of The Valleypointe Parkway Constr. BL And The 7. This Plan Sheet (6RW) Represents The Easement Computations for Parcels 004, 007, 008, 009, 010 And 011. 6. No Cemetery Sites Were Observed On The Subject Properties Shown On This Plan Sheet. This Does Not Preclude Their Existence. 5. Survey Datum Based On VDOT Project 1947-080-952, RW-201, M-501. 4. Proposed Easements Are Derived From Design Files Provided By VDOT. 3. This Compiled Plan Sheet Was Assembled Without The Benefit Of Title Reports Which May Affect The Properties Shown Hereon. Record Parcels Does Not Represent A Boundary Survey. 2. The Property Line Information Shown On This Plan Sheet Is Compiled From Record Data And Limited Field Measurements. This Compiled Map Of Approximate Only. Represent A Field Run Survey of The Adjoining Properties And Are A Best Fit Based On Compiled Data. All Areas Shown For Easements Are Are Compiled From Various Sources, Found Field Monumentation, Metes And Bounds Descriptions, And Recorded Plats. The Adjoining Lines Do Not 1. This Right Of Way Sheet Represents A Field Run Perimeter Survey Of The Proposed Limits. All OtherAdjoining/Departing Boundary Lines Shown General Notes: LICENSED SURVEYOR Blacksburg, Virginia HURT AND PROFFITT CHRISTOPHER B. KAKNIS ROYEVRUSDNAL AINIGRIVFOHTLAEWNOMMOC No.2359Lic. 04/23/25 ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THELMA D. GOBBLE GEORGE R. GOBBLE & ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ROLAND H. MALONE SR., LIVING TRUST RODNEY T. MALONE TRUSTEE ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. ENGLISH HOLDING COMPANY, INC. RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 RM-2 Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT 7415 WOOD HAVEN ROAD TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (VDOT) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY REALIGNMENT PROJECT, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the City of Salem collectively began purchasing property along Wood Haven Road, bounded by Interstate 81 and Interstate 581, for the Wood Haven Technology Park through the Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority around 2016; and WHEREAS, the property was rezoned to Planned Technology District (PTD) in 2018 and rezoned again in 2020 when new property was purchased and added to the park; and WHEREAS, staff have been investigating ways to improve the preferred route to Wood Haven Technology Park since the property was first purchased; this route includes Interstate 81, Interstate 581, the Exit 2 Peters Creek Road interchange, Peters Creek Road, Valleypointe Parkway and Wood Haven Road; and WHEREAS, the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project was conceptually designed in-house with the goals of (i) realigning Valleypointe Parkway with the entrance to Green Ridge Recreation Center, (ii) widening Valleypointe Parkway to four lanes; and (iii) providing sidewalk along Valleypointe Parkway from North Concourse Drive to connect to the existing sidewalk located at the intersection of Wood Haven Road and the entrance road to Green Ridge Recreation Center; and Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project was submitted for SMART SCALE Round 4 funding in 2020 and was included in the fiscal year 2022 Six Year Improvement Program in June 2021; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) began preliminary engineering for the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project in 2023; the project is currently in the right-of-way phase with construction anticipated in fiscal year 2026; and WHEREAS, as part of the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project, VDOT has requested easements at 7415 Wood Haven Road (Green Ridge Recreation Center) along the property's Wood Haven Road frontage to construct roadway and pedestrian improvements; and WHEREAS, VDOT contacted Roanoke County on May 30, 2025, with an offer package of $22,500 for the following components at 7415 Wood Haven Road (Green Ridge Recreation Center) along the property's Wood Haven Road frontage to facilitate the project: (i) permanent easement for VDOT utilities, (ii) temporary easement for construction; and (iii) landscaping to be removed; and WHEREAS, the proposed easements and landscaping removal are not anticipated to have an impact on operations at Green Ridge Recreation Center; and WHEREAS, § 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 24, 2025, and the second reading was held on July 8, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 3 of 3 1. The interest in real estate to be conveyed is hereby declared to be surplus, and is hereby made available for conveyance to VDOT for the Valleypointe Parkway Realignment project. 2. That conveyance to VDOT of the interest in real estate included on the attached Deed of Easement which is attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, any of whom may act, are authorized to execute, deliver, and record the Deeds of Easement, and any other documents, on behalf of the County, and to take such further actions as any of them may deem necessary or desirable in connection with this project. The form of the Deeds of Easement are hereby approved with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as the County Administrator may approve, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That the County accepts and appropriates the payment of $22,500 as fair market value compensation for the (i) permanent easement for VDOT utilities, (ii) temporary easement for construction; and (iii) landscaping to be removed. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.5 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 maintenance bill from the Supreme Court for maintaining their records, offset the cost of postage, equipment, etc. FISCAL IMPACT: All funds are provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia. No County matching funds are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting and allocating $19,184.82 to the Clerk of Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia that was requested in the May 2025 reimbursement from the Commonwealth of Virginia for maintenance and other items in compliance of VA Code Section 17.1-279. Capital Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves Unaudited balance as of June 30, 2025 31,213,980$ -$ -$ 613,094$ Approved Sources: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - 50,000 - 1,420,700 Approved Uses: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - - - (1,746,047) Balance at July 8, 2025 31,213,980$ 11.5% 50,000$ -$ 287,747$ County of Roanoke Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Fiscal Year 2025-2026 General Government Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Unaudited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2025 Additions Deletions July 8, 2025 VPSA School Bonds 109,321,388$ -$ -$ 109,321,388$ Lease Revenue Bonds 73,765,000 - - 73,765,000 Temporary Literary Loans*31,674,051 - - 31,674,051 Subtotal 214,760,439 - - 214,760,439 Premiums 13,337,299 - - 13,337,299 228,097,738$ -$ -$ 228,097,738$ * The County has been approved for $75 million in Literary Loans. This amount will not be turned into permanent loans until all monies are drawn down for the three school projects approved for funding which are: Glen Cove and W.E. Cundiff Elementary Schools and the Roanoke County Career and Technology Center Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services Approved By Richard L. Caywood County Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2025 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.