The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3/24/2026 - RegularPage 1 of 5 Please Note: There is no 6:00 p.m. evening session because there are no public hearings scheduled. INVOCATION: Reverend Mark Mofield, Melrose Baptist Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: “Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board.” Roanoke County Board of Supervisors March 24, 2026 Page 2 of 5 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for March 24, 2026. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 6:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place them on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution to recognize a Roanoke County Employee for exemplary service to Roanoke County. (Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator) D. BRIEFING 1. Presentation of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. (Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator) E. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Community Correction Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) Policy Board: Michael Poindexter – term expires June 30, 2028 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda March 24, 2026 Page 3 of 5 2.Court Community Corrections Regional Drug Court Advisory Board: Eric Orange – term to expire June 30, 2028 3.Court Community Corrections Program - Regional Community Criminal Justice Board (At-Large) Eric Orange – term to expire June 30, 2028 4.Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee (At-Large) David R. Jones – term to expire March 24, 2029 F.CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1.Approval of minutes – March 10, 2026 2.Ordinance Accepting and Appropriating $25,000.00 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, FY2026 Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Grant Program. (Second Reading) 3.Ordinance to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $23,471.79 from Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board for Next Gen 9-1-1 hardware. (Second Reading) 4.The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 5.The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, and 3499 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Page 4 of 5 6. The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 7. Request to accept and allocate $24,673 in grant funds from the Virginia Department of Fire Programs Mini-Grant Program. 8. Resolution Approving the County's Participation in the Proposed Combined Settlement Agreement Resolving Opioid-Related Claims Against Associated Pharmacies, Inc. (and American Associated Pharmacies); JM Smith Corporation; Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc; and United Natural Foods, Inc. (Including its Subsidiaries Supervalu and Advantage Logistics) (Collectively Referred to as the Six Remnant Defendants), and Directing the County Attorney to Execute the Documents Necessary to Effectuate the County's Participation in the Settlement. 9. Request to accept and allocate an additional $35,000 from the Department of Juvenile Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) grant budget for the purpose of detention alternative programs. G. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak H. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of February 28, 2026 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of February 28, 2026 5. Accounts Paid – February 2026 6. Statement of the Treasurer’s Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 2026 Page 5 of 5 I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Martha B. Hooker 2. Paul M. Mahoney 3. David F. Radford 4. Phil C. North 5. Tammy E. Shepherd J. WORK SESSION 1. Joint work session with the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA) Board of Directors. K. CLOSED MEETING 1. Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts. L. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION M. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to recognize a Roanoke County Employee for exemplary service to Roanoke County SUBMITTED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Resolution recognizing a Roanoke County employee for exemplary service to Roanoke County. DISCUSSION: This time has been set aside to recognize a Roanoke County employee for exemplary service to Roanoke County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Presentation of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget process, a balanced operating budget and a balanced 10 year capital improvement program is presented for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. This presentation provides an overview of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 - 2027 Operating Budget and the 10 Year Proposed Fiscal Year 2027 -2036 Capital Improvement Program. DISCUSSION: This time has been scheduled to provide the Board of Supervisors with a presentation on the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this briefing. The fiscal impact of the budget will be determined at budget adoption scheduled for May 26, 2026. Page 2 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors receive information regarding the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027 - 2036 Capital Improvement Program. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the Court Community Correction Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) Policy Board; Court Community Corrections Regional Drug Court Advisory Board; Court-Community Corrections Program - Regional Community Criminal Justice Board (At-Large); and Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee (At - Large) SUBMITTED BY: Rhonda Perdue Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointments. BACKGROUND: Court Community Correction Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) Policy Board: Chief Michael Poindexter’s appointment to this board expired June 30, 2025. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Chief Poindexter to an additional three (3) year term which will expire June 30, 2028. Court Community Corrections Regional Drug Court Advisory Board: Sheriff J. Eric Orange’s appointment to this board expired June 30, 2023. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Sheriff Orange to an additional three (3) year term which will expire June 30, 2028. Court Community Corrections Program - Regional Community Criminal Justice Board (At-Large) Page 2 of 2 Sheriff J. Eric Orange’s appointment to this board expired June 30, 2020. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Sheriff Orange to an additional three (3) year term which will expire June 30, 2028. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee (At-Large) David R. Jones’ (at Large) appointment to this committee expired June 30, 2019. Staff has recommended the reappointment of Mr. Jones to an additional three (3) year term which will expire March 24, 2029. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of these appointments. Page 1 of 2 A T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM F - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 24, 2026, designated as Item F - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9 inclusive, as follows: 1.Approval of minutes – March 10, 2026 2.Ordinance Accepting and Appropriating $25,000.00 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, FY2026 Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Grant Program. (Second Reading) 3.Ordinance to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $23,471.79 from Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board for Next Gen 9-1-1 hardware. (Second Reading) 4.The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2 , Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old M ountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 5.The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, and 3499 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Page 2 of 2 6. The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 7. Request to accept and allocate $24,673 in grant funds from the Virginia Department of Fire Programs Mini-Grant Program. 8. Resolution Approving the County's Participation in the Proposed Combined Settlement Agreement Resolving Opioid-Related Claims Against Associated Pharmacies, Inc. (and American Associated Pharmacies); JM Smith Corporation; Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc; and United Natural Foods, Inc. (Including its Subsidiaries Supervalu and Advantage Logistics) (Collectively Referred to as the Six Remnant Defendants), and Directing the County Attorney to Execute the Documents Necessary to Effectuate the County's Participation in the Settlement. 9. Request to accept and allocate an additional $35,000 from the Department of Juvenile Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) grant budget for the purpose of detention alternative programs. Page 1 of 4 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March 2026. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Before the meeting was called to order, an invocation/a moment of silence was observed. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call Present: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Absent: Supervisor Shepherd Staff Present: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator; Doug Blount, Deputy County Administrator; Madeline Hanlon, Assistant County Administrator, Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney; Amy Whittaker, Public Information Officer and Rhonda D. Perdue, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. BRIEFING 1. Briefing by the Roanoke Regional Partnership. (John Hull, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Partnership) Briefing was given by John Hull. D. PUBLIC HEARING Action No. 031026-1 Item D.1 1. Public hearing for citizen comments on the Real Estate effective tax rate for calendar year 2026. (Steve Elliott, Budget Administrator) No citizens were present. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Minutes March 10, 2026 – 2:00 p.m. Page 2 of 4 E. CONSENT AGENDA Action No. 031026-2.a-e Item E.1-5 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY Action No. 031026-2.a Item E.1 1. Approval of minutes – February 28, 2026 Action No. 031026-2.b Item E.2 2. Ordinance Accepting and Appropriating $25,000.00 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, FY2026 Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Grant Program. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) Action No. 031026-2.c Item E.3 3. Ordinance to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $23,471.19 from Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board for Next Gen 9-1-1 hardware. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) Action No. 031026-2.d Item E.4 4. Resolution authorizing approval of an Agreement for the Purchase of Electricity from Appalachian Power Company. Action No. 031026-2.e Item E.5 5. Library Board Appointment as set forth in the board report for this item. Supervisor Mahoney moved to adopt all matters on the consent agenda. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd F. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak. Page 3 of 4 No citizens were present. G. REPORTS Action No. 031026-3 Item G.1-2 1. Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report Supervisor North moved to receive and file the reports that have been included with the agenda under Item G. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Phil C. North 2. Martha B. Hooker 3. Paul M. Mahoney 4. David F. Radford 5. Tammy E. Shepherd Supervisors were offered the opportunity to share comments and provide updates to their peers and the public on items of interest to them. I. CLOSED MEETING Action No. 031026-4 1. Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts. 2. Section 2.2-3711(A)(3) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion or consideration of the disposition of publicly held real property, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor Radford moved to go to closed session. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Page 4 of 4 Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd J. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION Action No. 031026-5 In the closed session just concluded, nothing was discussed except the matter which was identified in the motion to convene in closed session. Only those matters lawfully permitted to be discussed under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed. Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the certification resolution. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd K. ADJOURNMENT Action No. 031026-6 Supervisor Mahoney moved to adjourn the meeting. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Radford Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Shepherd Submitted by: Approved by: __________________________ __________________________ Richard L. Caywood Tammy E. Shepherd Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Chairman Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.2 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 compliance. The Roanoke County Police Department currently conducts drone operations with unmanned quad-copter style drones equipped with cameras for search and rescue of lost hikers, tracking and locating fleeing/hidden suspects, assistance with K9 and SWAT operations, as well as surveillance during search warrant execution. This new drone is imperative for the continuity of police services to our community. There have been no changes since the first reading held on March 10, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: No local match is required; however, approximately $10,000 of the current fiscal year operating budget of the Police department will be used towards the purchase of this equipment.. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. 1 December 16, 2025 Mr. Richard Caywood County Administrator 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke,Virginia 24018 RE: 560183-CY26 DCJS Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Program Dear Mr. Richard Caywood: We are pleased to inform you that your organization has been awarded a grant under the funding opportunity listed above. Your DCJS grant award number is 560538 and was approved for a total budget of $25,000, through state funding. The project period is 1/1/2026 through 12/31/2026. Included with this letter is your Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA), Special Conditions, Reporting Requirements, and Projected Due Dates. Please review these materials carefully. In addition, there may be Encumbrances, action items related to your grant award, that require your immediate attention. If applicable, these must be addressed and submitted through the On-line Grants Management System (OGMS) at https://ogms.dcjs.virginia.gov. We are committed to supporting you throughout the life of your grant and are available to assist in any way to help ensure your project’s success. To formally accept the award and its conditions, please sign the enclosed Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA) and return it electronically within 60 days to grantsmgmt@dcjs.virginia.gov. If you have questions, contact your DCJS Grant Monitor Carolyn Dellorso at 804-845-1200 or via email at Carolyn.Dellorso@dcjs.virginia.gov. Sincerely, Jackson Miller Director 2 STATEMENT OF GRANT AWARD (SOGA) Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services 1100 Bank Street, 12th Floor Richmond, VA 23219 560183-CY26 DCJS Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Program Please note grant awards are contingent on the availability of funding. Roanoke, County 560538 GX4HPU2KPHE3 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 Mr. Patrick Pascoe Commander 5925 Cove Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 540-777-5258 ppascoe@roanokecountyva.gov County Administrator 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 540-776-7190 Rcaywood@roanokecountyva.gov Financial Analyst 5402 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 540-286-8137 jpegram@roanokecountyva.gov *If applicable, please indicate your ICR in the space provided and attach written documentation. As the duly authorized representative, the undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Awards (SOGA) and reviewing the Special Conditions, hereby accepts this grant and agrees to the conditions and provisions of all other Federal and State laws and rules and regulations that apply to this award. If there has been a change in an authorized official, cross out the information on the document and write the new contact information. Do not electronically alter this document. Authorized Official (Project Administrator) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $25,000 FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES FY2026 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT TRADE AND REPLACE GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department currently conducts drone operations with three unmanned quad-copter style drones equipped with cameras for search and rescue of lost hikers, tracking and locating fleeing/hidden suspects, assistance with K9 and SWAT operations, and surveillance during search warrant execution; and WHEREAS, all three drones are no longer usable under the new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2024; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (VDCJS) has awarded funding to the Roanoke County Police Department in the amount of $25,000 to replace certain unmanned aircraft through the Unmanned Aircraft Trade and Replace Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department will be able to purchase one drone to replace the three that are no longer in compliance with federal security standards; and WHEREAS, no County matching funds are required, however approximately $10,000 of the current fiscal year operating budget of the Police Department will be used toward the purchase of this equipment; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 2026, and the second reading was held on March 24, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the VDCJS grant in the amount of $25,000 is accepted and hereby appropriated to the County’s grant fund for the purchase a replacement drone. 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $23,471.79 from Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board for Next Gen 9-1-1 hardware SUBMITTED BY: Susan Slough Director of Emergency Communications APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $23,471.79 for Virginia 9 -1-1 Service. BACKGROUND: Since 2018 the Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board has been focused on the state-wide implementation of NG9-1-1 in all 124 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) across the state. DISCUSSION: As the state is going through the massive process of closing out the multi -million-dollar NG9-1-1 grant, we received notification that additional funds are available to us for reimbursement. There have been no changes since the first reading held on March 10, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: No County matching funds are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Page 2 of 2 Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Date Submitted by PSAP PSAP Name - FIPS (Dropdown) PSAP EIN PSAP Address *NG911 FUNDING YEAR/ID # Contact Name Contact Email/Telephone # Intrado CHE i3 Services Portion of Intrado CHE Refresh + ESINET work Virginia Department of Emergency Management NG9-1-1 AND TEXT-to-911 FUNDING REIMBURSEMENT FORM (NOT INTENDED FOR PEP or NON-PEP GRANT FUNDING REIMBURSEMENT) 11/25/2025 PLEASE COMPLETE FORM AND SUBMIT IN EDITABLE FORMAT SEPARATE FROM THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATON WITHIN THE SAME EMAIL TO: PSAPGRANTS@VDEM.VIRGINIA.GOV Roanoke County - 161 5925 Cove Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019 54-6001572 NG911-111 Rebekah Craft bcraft@roanokecountyva.gov 540-777-8656 *REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST FUNDING CATEGORY: (*Select only ONE funding category for each form submitted) CHE i3 Services (A) __X_____ CHE Replacement (B) _______ GIS Data (C) _______ Monthly Delta (D) _______ Rack (E) _______ Text-to-911 (F) _______ Voice Logging (G) _______ eCATS (IC) ________ IP Cost Recovery (IP) _______ Vendor Invoice Date Invoice #Total Invoice Amount Comments 9/8/2021 5048147 23,471.79$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ PSC Program Manager Approval: CODING: FUND 09281 PROG 712002 DEPT 98518100 COST CTR 983080 ACCT CODE 5014310 *REQUIRED IN ORDER TO CONSIDER REQUEST COMPLETE IN SUBMISSION EIN - Locality's Tax ID TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT:23,471.79$ VDEM USE ONLY - INVOICE # (fiscal year - date processed - grant ID)NGS COMMENTS: Project quote on file with NGS. Award Balance After Pmt: Balance to Fund: Date Received:Date Processed: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,471.79 FROM VIRGINIA 9-1-1 SERVICES BOARD FOR NEXT GEN 9-1-1 HARDWARE WHEREAS, since 2018, the Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board has been focused on the state-wide implementation of NG9-1-1 in all 124 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) across the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, as the Commonwealth is going through the massive process of closing out the multi-million dollar NG9-1-1 grant, we received notification that additional funds are available to us for reimbursement; and WHEREAS, no County matching funds are required; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 2026, and the second reading was held on March 24, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1.That Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board grant in the amount of $23,471.79 is accepted and hereby appropriated to the County’s grant fund. 2.That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for April 28, 2026. The title of this ordinance is as follows: The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R -1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: . That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 28, 2026. . That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. County of Roanoke Community Develo1,mcnt Planning & Zoning For Starr Use Only P(' BZAdarc 5204 Bernard Drive PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ZOU, Plaards u..,cd ROS Jatc: L/ zg (540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of opphca1ion lil.:d (check all thnt apply) Id Rewning Spcciul Un u V1'riancc Wainr r AdmiDistrativc Ap11cal o Comp Phtn (l�.2 -22JZ) Rc,•il'W Applicants name. address w zip Phone. (540)598-2664 Old Orchard Farm. LLC Cell# (540)596-2664 517 Walnut Ave SE, Roanoke, VA 24014 Lma1l· Conlact for Legal Ads WhllEllefmaa Owner's namc•oddr1 .. ·ss w tip Phone# SAME Ct:11# fma1I: Prop.:rty Location Magist1.-rial DtMrtcl. Hollins 7131 Old Mountain Road. Roanoke, VA 2401 19 Community Plannmg area Holl11s Ta., Maft No.:See a tached list of tax mao numbers Extstmg lomng: R·1/R·2 Size of parccl(s): Acres 240 MOL Ex1�1111g I.and Use: Agricultural REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (l.lJ.11.JJJ REJIIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: AR Proposed Land Use: Agncullural • Horse stables (commercial), gardens, orchards O�s the parcel meet the mmnnum lot area. width, and fronlage requirements of the r«1ucsh:d district? Yes X: No IF NO. A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezonhatt), Does the parcel mccl the nummum l.nlcna for th<.: requ�t«t l 1se Type in Arlicle IV (Sp�ial U� Permit)'? Y1.-s No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are cond11tons bcmg proflcred with this requesl'! YesJ No JI ARIANCE, WA/VER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (JI/WI.AA) Variance/Waiver ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order 10: Appeal of Zoning AdmmtMrator's dect�1on to Appeal l)f lnlcrprctatioo ofSect11)11(s) of the Roonoke County l()lllllg Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation ofZon111g Map 10 Is the applica1io11 compkte? Please check ti enclose d. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. k/S/WICP \'/AA R/S/WICP \'/AA R/Sf\\/C'P \"/AA Consullallon Eli 8 I 2" x 11" concq,1 pion � Applicetiun f.:c Applicahon Metes and bounds dt�nption Prolle1-:o:. if:lwl�ablc Jti.�tilicatroo Wat�'!' and sewer applicauon Adjoining propcny owners I ho:n:byefftify th:11 I am .:11hcr 1ht owner of the ._-..._<>r the own,:r·s agent or conlr.k.1 ptm.:hther ond am acting wi1h the kno\\1.:dgc and co.>n�cnt f 1hc ow1l\.'f 2 2/11/26 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner’s Signature Date Old Orchard Farm, LLC 2/11/26 Old Orchard Farm, LLC Tax Parcel Number Deeded Acreage Estimated Acreage Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 028.03-01-25.00-0000 119.11 122.49 R1 AR 028.03-01-26.00-0000 2.3 1.98 R1 AR 028.00-01-07.00-0000 22.88 22.67 R1 AR 028.03-01-23.00-0000 4.46 5 R1 AR 028.03-01-22.00-0000 56.43 55.59 R1 AR 028.03-01-24.00-0000 2.05 2.07 R1 AR 039.01-01-46.00-0000 42.7 37.86 R2 AR Parcel Areas and Zoning Designations Old Orchard Farm, LLC Rezoning Application Introduction This is an application for the rezoning of seven (7) tax parcels totaling 250 acres more- or-less (collectively, the “Property”) in the Hollins District of Roanoke County from R-1 and R-2 to AR. The change of zoning designation for the Property is consistent with the intent and purpose behind the AR zoning district, fulﬁlls the values of the Hollins Community Planning Area, and reduces the demand on County resources as compared to development of the land consistent with its current designation. Description of Past, Current, and Planned Land Uses In 1939 the Property was owned by the Roanoke Orchard Company. The September 27, 1939 edition of the Roanoke World-News described the land as follows: Somnolent under a hot September sun, the great orchard sprawls over its north- sloping hills. Across the valley, dreamy in the autumnal haze, the Appalachian mountains stand out in blue relief. The scene is one of peace. But it is not one of inactivity. For this is apple picking time in Virginia, as the State’s third largest commercial crop reaches its harvest peak. “Harvesting of Apples, State’s Third Largest Commercial Crop, in Full Swing in this Area,” The Roanoke World-News, September 27, 1939. The article goes on to paint a picture of a vibrant orchard operation, of wagons rolling along farm lanes, moving apples picked by 35 men and women from 5,000 fruit trees to produce between 2,000 and 3,000 bushels of fruit packed per day. Id. Ads from the same paper list apples for sale from the Property as early as 1923, and research shows that the Property held agricultural uses pre-dating the Civil War. Even after the end of the Roanoke Orchard Company’s apple production on the Property, the land has been used for agricultural purposes, including the raising and grazing of cattle by the Andrews and Bradshaw families. We purchased the Property in 2023 with the dream of maintaining this unique bit of land in the way it has been used for generations. In a growing and vibrant urban and suburban community, rural land in such close proximity to an urban center is unusual and special. We care deeply for the heritage of this region, our community, and the Property in particular, and want to ensure its continuation, even if only in this small part. It is our intention to make our home on the Property and to maintain the land in a combination of pasture and forest. Our home is currently under construction, as is a horse barn and pasture, along with hoop houses for year-round vegetable growing. While we 2 could never replicate what once existed with the Roanoke Orchard Company, it is part of our long-term dream to restore at least a small part of the land to apple growing, as a nod to the history of this place. While the current agricultural uses of the land are permissible as pre-existing non- conforming uses, we seek rezoning to allow for the future possibility of certain commercial agricultural uses that would not be permitted under current R-1/-2 zoning. These uses include, but are not limited to commercial stabling of horses (boarding and lessons), fruit and vegetable production and sale, and potential agri-tourism uses or similar events. Rezoning Application Questions and Responses 1.Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classiﬁcation in the Zoning Ordinance. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance characterizes the Agricultural Residential (“AR”) zoning district and sets forth its purpose as follows: These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-34-1(A). The Hollins District of Roanoke County is growing in population and consequently both residential and commercial development. While vibrant residential and commercial centers beneﬁt the community, the County has clearly expressed an intention to maintain certain areas with present and past rural character in that state. Preservation of the Property as rural, agricultural land, and rezoning it to AR to allow for further uses in that tradition, promotes the County’s objective to stay true to its heritage while also supporting future growth and development. 3 2.Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Planning Area Analysis for the Hollins Community Area lists among its “Community Values”: •There are many historic sites in the community that play a key role of providing the links to the past agricultural traditions of the community. •View of Tinker and Read Mountains are important to the residents of the community. Roanoke County Community Plan (2005), Chapter 7: Planning Area Analysis, Hollins Community Planning Area. As currently zoned (R-1 and R-2), the Property could be developed by right into a higher density residential community. While there is undoubtedly need in the Roanoke region for additional housing stock, maintaining the Property as agricultural, and allowing for low- intensity commercial agricultural uses, preserves in small part the rural nature of this part of Roanoke County. It is a stated goal of the County, as set forth in the AR zoning deﬁnition to encourage agricultural uses and to “maintain these areas essentially in their rural state.” The Community Plan also sets out the following statement of value and intention behind preserving rural land and promoting agricultural uses thereon: “In a broader sense, the existence of rural areas, working farms, pastoral views, and open space enhance the quality of life of all residents of the Roanoke Valley. Farming is an important and critical link to our agrarian heritage and culture…” Roanoke County Community Plan (2005), Chapter 5: Resource Preservation, Agricultural Resources. The rezoning of the Property to AR ensures its continued use as agricultural land. This is consistent with and helps to fulﬁll the County’s stated value of maintaining where possible its rural character and agricultural heritage. 3.Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and ﬁre and rescue. Regardless of this change of zoning designation, we have no intention of ever developing the Property to the extent allowable under the R-1 or R-2 designations. That being said, rezoning the Property to AR ensures it will remain rural in character, thereby preserving its long history as farmland and also reducing demand on County services compared to what would exist if put to a more intensive use (e.g. residential or commercial development). The farm operations we plan for the Property will rely on well water and private (septic) sewer systems. As such, it will not add any demand on County utility services. Likewise, unlike a residential development, farm roads within the Property will be privately – not publicly – maintained. There is also no reason to anticipate that the rezoning of the Property would cause any increase demand on ﬁre, police, or emergency services. With two new residential communities under development along Old Mountain Road in close proximity to the Property, vehicle traffic along that corridor will increase in the coming years, as will demand upon schools created by additional residential population. The rezoning and planned uses of the Property will not add to this increased demand on roadways or schools in a meaningful way. The substantially lower intensity agricultural use will not require additional vehicle traffic along Old Mountain Road or adjacent thoroughfares, nor will the limited residential use of the land increase local school censuses as would residential development of the Property. Finally, the rezoning will cause no additional demand on County Parks. Instead, by ensuring that Property remains rural and agricultural in character and use, it will be a beneﬁt to the County’s park and conservation land at Read Mountain. By not developing the Property into a higher-density residential community, we will maintain the natural viewsheds to and from Read Mountain, and also preserve and protect forest and pasturelands used as habitat for wildlife in the Read Mountain Preserve area. Conclusion We ask the County to permit a rezoning of the Property from R-1 and R-2 to AR to allow for continued and expanded agricultural uses of the land. Rezoning the Property to AR creates no additional drain on County resources and is consistent with current and planned land use and development in the Old Mountain Road corridor and Hollins Planning Area. The proposed uses are in keeping with the historic land use of the Property and consistent with the purposes of the AR zoning designation and the County’s stated intention to maintain rural land where possible. This land is a “link to the past agricultural traditions of the community,” and we ask that this rezoning be approved in order to preserve and honor that heritage. Old Mountain Road - Aerial Map Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County, Earthstar Geographics 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 TR PI NC DE CN Old Mountain Road - Future Land Use Map Roanoke County Future Land Use Conservation Development Neighborhood Conservation Transition Principal Industrial 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 AG3R2 R1 I2 R1S C2 R1 I1 I1 I2S R1S R3 I1S R2 C1 R1CR2 C2 R2 I1 I2 I1 R1 R1C R1 C2S I1C R1 R1S AG3 R1 R1 R2 I1 I1C I2 R1 I1C R1 I1S AG3S Old Mountain Road - Zoning Map Roanoke County Zoning AG3 C1 C2 I1 I2 R1 R2 R3 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, and 3499 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for April 28, 2026. The title of this ordinance is as follows: The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R - 1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, and 3499 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: . That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 28, 2026. . That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 Harborwood Road Properties Aerial Map Vantor, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 RV Harborwood Road Properties FLU Map Roanoke County Future Land Use Rural Village 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 AG3 R1R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 Harborwood Road Properties Zoning Map Roanoke County Zoning AG3 R1 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for April 28, 2026. The title of this ordinance is as follows: The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C -2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 There is no discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: . That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 28, 2026. . That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS Date received: '2/f'J/z,oU Application fee: $157 SO Placards issued· C'aseNwnber Received by. ,4c PC'•'BZA date: I{/ b / 2()2{, BOS date· 4/z<g/ZOU Check type of application filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning Jspecial Use □ Variance o Waiver □ Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (IS.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zi p Tina Arcuri 5374 Greggs Landing N Charleston SC 29420 Owner's name/address w/zip PS Southeast 701 Western Ave Glendale, CA 91201 Property Location Phone: (843)604-4114 Cell#: Email: Contact for Legal Ads Phone#: (818)244-8080 Cell#: Email: Magisterial District: Catawba 917 North Electric Rd Salem, VA 241 S3 Community Planning area: Peters Creek Community Plan Tax Map No.: 036.19-01-41.01-0000 Existing Zoning: C2CS Size of parcel(s): Acres: 10.54 Existing Land Use: Comm - lndl REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAI YER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2132) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning:No Change Proposed Land Use: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No IF NO, A V ARJANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning). Docs the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request'? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (YIWIAA) Variance/Waiver of Seclion(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to _____________________ _ Appeal of Interpretation ofSection(s): _____ ofthe Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to _______________________ _ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP VIAA EE Consultation Apphcauon Justification R/S/W/CP V/AA 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan � Application fee Metes and bounds descnptron Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify thal I am either the o\,ner �r rty r the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent r the owner. \l -----4fC-�:.:..._ ______________ O\\ner·s Signature Acting as agent for owner via attached LOA 2 5-4/2026 3 Applicant Tina Arcuri The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS See Attached See Attached See Attached 6 ALL APPLICANTS a.Applicant name and name of development b.Date, scale and north arrow c.Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d.Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e.Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f.The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g.All property lines and easements h.All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i.Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j.Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k.Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site l.Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m.Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n.Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o.Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p.Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q.If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or impos ed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2 -2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: 2/13/26 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner’s Signature Date Tina Arcuri 2/13/26 Project Description Public Storage is a new tenant at 917 North Electric Road in Roanoke County, Virginia. The applicant is requesting approval for installation of new exterior signage identifying the facility. The proposed sign is consistent with Public Storage’s nationally recognized branding standards and is designed to provide clear, professional identiﬁcation of the business while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding commercial corridor. Importantly, the proposed Public Storage sign is signiﬁcantly smaller than the existing SecurStor Self Storage sign previously located on the property. The new signage represents a reduction in overall sign area and visual scale compared to the former tenant’s signage. As such, the request results in a visual improvement and reduced signage impact along the Electric Road corridor. The property is located along Electric Road (Route 419), a major arterial corridor characterized by commercial development, retail establishments, service businesses, and institutional uses. The requested signage will be installed on an existing commercial site and will not involve expansion of the building footprint or any change in land use. 1.How the Request Furthers the Purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the Applicable Zoning District The intent of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community by regulating land use in a manner that: •Encourages orderly development •Protects property values •Enhances visual quality •Promotes economic vitality •Ensures compatibility among land uses The proposed sign directly furthers these purposes in the following ways: A. Orderly and Coordinated Commercial Development Electric Road is a well-established commercial corridor where signage is expected and necessary for business identiﬁcation. The proposed Public Storage sign: •Provides clear identiﬁcation of a lawful commercial use. •Maintains consistency with the commercial character of the corridor. •Contributes to an organized and professional streetscape. •Reduces overall sign mass compared to the previous SecurStor signage. By replacing a larger existing sign with a smaller, professionally designed sign, the applicant supports the Ordinance’s goal of structured and harmonious development. B. Protection of Public Safety The proposed signage will: •Improve wayﬁnding and reduce driver confusion. •Allow motorists to safely identify the business from appropriate distances. •Reduce sudden lane changes or abrupt stops caused by unclear identiﬁcation. Clear identiﬁcation of commercial entrances along an arterial roadway enhances traffic safety. The reduced sign size further minimizes visual clutter while maintaining adequate visibility. C. Protection of Property Values and Visual Quality Because the new sign is signiﬁcantly smaller than the previous SecurStor sign, it: •Reduces visual intensity along the corridor. •Improves proportionality relative to the building façade. •Contributes to a cleaner and more reﬁned streetscape appearance. This reduction in sign area demonstrates sensitivity to corridor aesthetics and reinforces the Ordinance’s intent to enhance visual quality while allowing effective business identiﬁcation. D. Consistency with the Purpose of the Applicable Zoning District The commercial zoning classiﬁcation along Electric Road is intended to: •Provide areas for retail and service establishments. •Accommodate businesses serving the community. •Maintain attractive and functional commercial corridors. •Ensure compatibility with surrounding development. The proposed signage supports these purposes by: •Identifying a permitted commercial use. •Enhancing the operational viability of the site. •Maintaining appropriate scale and compatibility. •Reducing overall signage impact compared to the prior tenant. The request does not increase intensity or alter district character; rather, it represents a visual improvement over previous conditions. 2. Conformance with the Roanoke County Community Plan The Roanoke County Community Plan emphasizes: •Managed growth and reinvestment in existing commercial corridors •Enhancement of arterial corridor aesthetics •Economic development and business retention •Safe and efficient transportation networks A. Reinforcement of Established Commercial Corridors Electric Road (Route 419) is a primary commercial corridor within the County. The Community Plan encourages reinvestment and upgrades within established areas. The proposed signage: •Represents reinvestment by a new national tenant. •Improves building identity while reducing overall sign size. •Supports continued viability of an existing commercial property. B. Corridor Aesthetics and Visual Character The reduced scale of the proposed sign compared to the previous SecurStor sign directly advances the Community Plan’s emphasis on maintaining attractive commercial corridors. The new sign: •Is professionally manufactured. •Is appropriately scaled to the building and roadway. •Reduces visual mass and clutter along Electric Road. This represents a net visual improvement to the corridor. C. Transportation and Access Management Clear signage supports safe travel along Electric Road by allowing motorists to anticipate site access. The project: •Does not alter access points. •Does not increase traffic generation. •Improves wayﬁnding without increasing visual distraction. 3. Impacts of the Request A. Impact on the Subject Property The impact on the property is positive: •Enhances tenant identiﬁcation. •Supports long-term commercial viability. •Reduces signage scale compared to the prior tenant. •Does not increase development footprint or impervious area. B. Impact on Adjoining Properties The adjoining properties consist primarily of commercial uses. The proposed sign: •Is compatible with surrounding commercial signage. •Is smaller than the previous sign on-site. •Will not obstruct views, light, or air. •Will not create glare or nuisance conditions if illuminated in accordance with County standards. Given the reduction in sign area, impacts on adjoining properties are less than those previously experienced under the SecurStor signage. C. Impact on the Surrounding Area The surrounding area is commercial in nature. The proposed signage: •Maintains the commercial character of the corridor. •Reduces overall signage intensity. •Does not increase density or change land use patterns. The request results in a net aesthetic improvement relative to prior conditions. 4.Impacts on Public Services and Facilities Water and Sewer No additional demand is created by the signage. Existing infrastructure remains adequate. Roads and Traffic No increase in traffic beyond the approved commercial use. The signage improves visibility without creating safety concerns. Schools No impact, as the use is non-residential. Parks and Recreation No impact. Fire and Rescue No change in emergency access or service demand. Conclusion The proposed Public Storage signage at 917 North Electric Road: •Furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. •Is consistent with the intent of the applicable commercial zoning district. •Conforms to the Roanoke County Community Plan. •Results in a reduction in overall sign size compared to the previous SecurStor Self Storage signage, thereby improving corridor aesthetics. • Creates no adverse impacts on neighboring properties or public services. For these reasons, approval of the requested signage is respectfully recommended. Budget Signs dba Fastsigns of Salem (VA) Coastal Sign Service 911 N Electric Rd. Salem, VA January 22, 2026 It is the intent and purpose of this color rendering to provide a basic color representation of your sign finish and color. However, digital media and printed colors will vary from actual paint finish and color. Existing painted surfaces will have a perceptible difference in shade and sheen from your sign finish. Providing a sample of the paint you wish to match or a Matthews paint color formula will minimize the differences. © 2025 Image National, Inc. This design is an original work of authorship by Image National, Inc. (image) which owns the copyright protection by the copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code). All rights are reserved by image and, until the use of this design is authorized by image in writing, image owns the exclusive rights to: a) reproduce this design in copies, in graphic form or as a sign; b) prepare derivative works based upon the design; c) distribute copies of the design by sale or other transfer of ownership; and d) display the design publicly. U.S. & P.R. - All signs conform to UL-48/2161 (labeled accordingly) & must comply with UL-41.1 install procedures. Canada - all signs must be CAS compliant. This sign(s) is intended to be installed in accordance with requirements of article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. Site #:File: 16265 Star Rd., Nampa, ID 83687 - toll free: 800.592.8058 - tele: 208.345.4020 imagenational.com PBS-23941-SALEM VA-021826-R623941 911 N. ELECTRIC RD. SALEM, VA 24153 Designer: Account Manager: Date:02/18/26 Page Version:1 RA/MB/AF XX HS Reviewed by: Engineer:XX 2 of 20 SITE MAP SCALE: 1” = 150’-0” SIGN TYPELOCATIONSIGN # DESIGN SIGN STATUS - MAIN ID WALL SIGNS DESIGN SIGN STATUS - FREESTANDING SIGNS ELECTRIC RD.D/F MONUMENT SIGN - NON-ILLUMINATED2 EAST ELEVATION FCO LETTERS - RENTAL OFFICE ON BACKER PANEL3 DESIGN SIGN STATUS - SECONDARY WALL SIGNS / DIRECTIONALS / PANELS WEST ELEVATION CHANNEL LETTERS - ILLUMINATED ON BACKER PANEL1 10 ' - 0 ” P . L . 2 3-4 1 PHOTO SURVEY CHECKLIST FULL WALL ELEVATIONS (STRAIGHT ON) ENSURE ALL PHOTOS ARE: STRAIGHT, HIGH QUALITY & CLEAR. Please include the following: CLOSE UP OF SIGN BAND (STRAIGHT ON) PHOTOS OF ELECTRICAL ACCESS PHOTOS OF WINDOW FOR VINYL (STRAIGHT ON) FULL FREESTANDING SIGNS (STRAIGHT ON) SIDE VIEW FREESTANDING SIGNS INTERIOR PHOTOS OF FREESTANDING SIGN CABINETS EXISTING CONDITION CONCERNS/NOTES: City of Salem TR NCCO 917 North Electric Road - Future Land Use Map Vantor, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi 0 0.2 0.40.1 km 1:9,495 City of Salem Core (CO) Neighborhood Conservation (NC) Transition (TR) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2S R1 R3C R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 I2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 I2 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C2CS R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C2CS R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 917 North Electric Road - Zoning Map Low Intensity Commercial (C-1) High Intensity Commercial (C-2) High Intensity Industrial (I-2) (NC) ZONING DISTRICTS Low Density Residential (R-1) Medium Density Residential (R-2) Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) City of Salem Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Accept and Allocate $24,673 in Grant Funds from the Virginia Department of Fire Programs Mini-Grant Program SUBMITTED BY: C. Travis Griffith Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Request to accept grant funding from the Virginia Department of Fire Programs (VDFP) Mini-Grant Program to purchase particulate-blocking hoods in order to meet updated National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards. The grant award is $24,673, with a total estimated project cost of $59,200 to outfit career and volunteer firefighters. The Fire & Rescue budget will cover the remaining $34,527 using funds from the department’s budgeted personal protective equipment (PPE) account. BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Fire Programs (VDFP) Mini-Grant Program is designed to enhance the capabilities of fire departments by helping reduce their financial burden. Mini-Grant award amounts are determined by the Virginia Fire Services Board based on demonstrated need. The maximum amount that may be awarded through the Mini - Grant Program is $24,673 per jurisdiction per year. DISCUSSION: The Virginia Department of Fire Programs (VDFP) Mini-Grant Program has awarded grant funding to support the purchase of particulate-blocking hoods in accordance with the updated National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard. The acquisition of these hoods for Fire & Rescue career and volunteer personnel will help ensure continued compliance with current NFPA safety standards. These hoods provide an Page 2 of 2 added layer of protection by reducing firefighters’ exposure to harmful particulates during fire suppression operations, thereby improving the overall safety and health of our personnel. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Virginia Department of Fire Programs (VDFP) Mini -Grant award is $24,673. The estimated total cost to outfit Fire & Rescue career and volunteer personnel with particulate-blocking hoods is $59,200. Fire & Rescue will cover the remaining $34,527 using budgeted personal protective equipment (PPE) funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of $24,673 in grant funding from the Virginia Department of Fire Programs Mini-Grant Program to the Fire and Rescue Department to support the purchase of particulate -blocking hoods for career and volunteer personnel. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Approving the County's Participation in the Proposed Combined Settlement Agreement Resolving Opioid-Related Claims Against Associated Pharmacies, Inc. (and American Associated Pharmacies); JM Smith Corporation; Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc; and United Natural Foods, Inc. (Including its Subsidiaries Supervalu and Advantage Logistics) (Collectively Referred to as the Six Remnant Defendants), and Directing the County Attorney to Execute the Documents Necessary to Effectuate the County's Participation in the Settlement SUBMITTED BY: Peter S. Lubeck County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approval of participation in the proposed settlement agreement. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: A new national opioid settlement has been reached with six regional distributors/ dispensers of opioids: •Associated Pharmacies, Inc., •JM Smith Corporation, •Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., •Morris and Dickson Co., •North Carolina Mutual Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., and •United Natural Foods, Inc. There is one settlement agreement covering the combined settlement with these Six “Remnant Defendants.” Page 2 of 2 If effectuated, the proposed Six Remnant Defendants Settlement will result in the six defendants paying a combined $97,625,000 in cash. Disbursements to eligible entities (including Roanoke County) will be made as a one-time settlement payment. This settlement agreement is unique in that it does not include state attorneys general or any amount allocated to a state. Rather, this settlement will be distributed only and directly to the eligible entities. It is estimated that Roanoke County would receive a single payment of approximately $30,112. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, at least 95% of the funds received must be spent on opioid remediation. Our outside opioid counsel recommends that the Board accept the settlement and authorize the County Attorney to sign the necessary participation and release forms. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that Roanoke County would receive a single payment of approximately $30,112. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the resolution approving participation in the settlement. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COUNTY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE PROPOSED COMBINED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RESOLVING OPIOID-RELATED CLAIMS AGAINST ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES, INC. (AND AMERICAN ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES); J M SMITH CORPORATION; LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, INC; MORRIS AND DICKSON CO.; NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, INC.; and UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. (INCLUDING ITS SUBSIDIARIES SUPERVALU AND ADVANTAGE LOGISTICS) (COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS THE SIX REMNANT DEFENDANTS), AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE COUNTY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT There is one settlement agreement covering the combined settlement with the Six Remnant Defendants. WHEREAS, the opioid epidemic that has cost thousands of human lives across the country also impacts the County of Roanoke by adversely impacting the delivery of emergency medical, law enforcement, criminal justice, mental health and substance abuse services, and other services by the County’s various departments and agencies; and WHEREAS, the County has been required and will continue to be required to allocate substantial taxpayer dollars, resources, staff energy and time to address the damage the opioid epidemic has caused and continues to cause the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, a settlement proposal has been negotiated that will cause six opioids defendants, Associated Pharmacies, Inc (and American Associated Pharmacies); J M Smith Corporation; Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.; Morris and Dickson Co.; North Carolina Mutual Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.; and United Natural Foods, Inc. (including its subsidiaries SuperValu and Advantage Logistics) (“Six Remnant Defendants”) to pay approximately $97,625,000 nationwide to resolve opioid-related claims by state subdivisions against it; and WHEREAS, the County will be entitled to a portion of the settlement proceeds despite not having filed suit against any of the Six Remnant Defendants; and WHEREAS, the County seeks recovery of the public funds previously expended and to be expended in the future to abate the consequences and harms of the opioid epidemic; and WHEREAS, the County’s outside opioid litigation counsel has recommended that the County participate in the Six Remnant Defendants settlement in order to recover its share of the funds that the settlement would provide; and WHEREAS, the County Attorney has reviewed the available information about the proposed settlement and concurs with the recommendation of outside counsel. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of March 2026, approves of the County’s participation in the proposed settlement of opioid-related claims against the Six Remnant Defendants and their related corporate entities, and directs the County Attorney to execute the documents necessary to effectuate the County’s participation in the settlement, including the required release of claims against the Six Remnant Defendants. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and allocate an additional $35,000 from the Department of Juvenile Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) grant budget for the purpose of detention alternative programs. SUBMITTED BY: Susan Goad Director of Social Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Accept and allocate an additional $35,000 from the Department of Juvenile Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) grant budget for the purpose of detention alternative programs. BACKGROUND: On July 9, 2024, a resolution was approved by the Board of supervisors supporting participation in the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) Grant Program of the Department of Juvenile Justice for the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 fiscal years. The board report and approved resolution are attached. DISCUSSION: The VJCCCA grant program funds four full-time Roanoke County positions. In FY2024, rising personnel costs resulted in overspending the program budget and required $27,300 in additional local funds from the County. Projecting expenditures to exceed budget again for FY2026, in January 2026, staff applied for $60,000 of additional state funds from the Department of Juvenile Justice. On March 16, the state awarded additional VJCCCA funds in the amount of $35,000 for Page 2 of 2 the purpose of detention alternative programs. The funds will need to be expended by the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 2026 and reported in FY2026 state reporting. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional $35,000 grant award requires no additional local match. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the additional $35,000 from the Department of Juvenile Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) grant. Page 1 of 3 ACTION NO. 070924-4.e ITEM NO. F.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 9, 2024 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution supporting participating in the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) Grant Program of the Department of Juvenile Justice for the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 fiscal years. SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Director of Finance and Management Services APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approve resolution for VJCCCA grant participation. BACKGROUND: In 1995, the Virginia General Assembly passed the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) to allow localities greater flexibility and autonomy to develop programs to better meet the needs of at-risk youth in their communities. VJCCCA is meant to be a community-based system of progressive sanctions and services that hold youth accountable for their actions and decrease risky and criminal behavior in the future. The County of Roanoke has partnered for many years with the City of Salem to operate the Juvenile Intervention Services Program, located in the Court Services Unit, to provide direct services to youth and families. The VJCCCA grant funds four (4), full- time positions for staff who provide intensive monitoring, supervision, and advocacy for youth at risk. DISCUSSION: The Juvenile Intervention Services (JIS) Program serves youth ages 11-18, who are involved in the juvenile justice system in Roanoke County and City of Salem. One of Page 2 of 3 the program’s primary objectives is to maintain youth safely in their home, school and community by offering an alternative to detention. JIS operates two (2) programs to achieve that goal, an Outreach Detention Program and a Home Electronic Monitoring (GPS) Program. Staff engage with youth face-to-face multiple times a week to determine their compliance, supervise their whereabouts and assess their needs in multiple settings. The alternative detention programs have a high rate of successful discharges, higher than the State average, and a recidivism rate lower than that statewide. For the upcoming grant cycle for fiscal year 2024-2025 and fiscal year 2025-2026, the JIS Program will continue offering a relatively new program in response to changing community needs. The new program focuses more resources on prevention services for youth contacting the juvenile justice system for the first time. The new program identifies youth at-risk and provides check-ins, monitoring, referrals and incentives to help youth decrease risky behavior and isolation and increase pro social behavior and practical skills. In addition, the JIS Program also provides other successful alternative detention programs. The City of Salem intends to continue its participation in the Juvenile Intervention Services Program and will continue to dedicate their local and state VJCCCA funds to the operation of the JIS Program. The grant requires the County to contribute $24,644 and the City of Salem to contribute $9,418 for fiscal year 2024-2025 and for fiscal year 2025-2026 as the local maintenance of effort. The Department of Juvenile Justice requires that the attached resolution be adopted by the County of Roanoke allowing participation in the grant program and recognizing that the City of Salem’s grant monies will be used to support the Juvenile Intervention Services Program. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant requires the County to contribute $24,644 for the upcoming two (2) fiscal years as our maintenance of effort. Salem will contribute $9,418 each year. Those local contributions will leverage $232,833 in State funds. There has been no increase in the local maintenance of effort for several years. No appropriation is required as this was included in the fiscal year 2025 approved budget and will be included in the fiscal year 2026 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution to continue participation in the VJCCCA grant for fiscal years 2024-2025 and 2025-2026. Page 3 of 3 VOTE: Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. CC: Laurie Gearheart, Director of Finance and Management Services Joshua Pegram, Finance Mr. Radford Ms. Hooker Mr. Mahoney Ms. Shepherd Mr. North Capital Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves Audited balance as of June 30, 2025 31,213,980$ -$ -$ 613,094$ Approved Sources: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - 50,000 - 1,420,700 Addition from 2024-25 close out and reimbursements of completed projects - - - 147,219 Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 121625-5) 1,448,997 680,479 Approved Uses: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - - - (1,746,047) Items for Brian Epperley memorial - (1,282) - - Huntridge Road Traffic (Resolution 011326-6)(17,643) Deer Culling (25,000) Balance at March 24, 2026 32,662,977$ 12.0% 6,075$ 680,479$ 434,966$ County of Roanoke Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Fiscal Year 2025-2026 General Government Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Audited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2025 Additions Deletions March 24, 2026 Debt type: VPSA School Bonds 109,321,388$ -$ 7,026,556$ 102,294,832$ Lease Revenue Bonds 72,515,000 20,040,000 4,715,000 87,840,000 Temporary Literary Loans*31,674,051 30,132,128 - 61,806,179 Subtotal 213,510,439 50,172,128 11,741,556 251,941,011 Premiums 13,244,796 1,709,584 - 14,954,380 226,755,235$ 51,881,712$ 11,741,556$ 266,895,391$ Summary by entity: County 77,345,868$ 21,749,584$ 4,715,000$ 94,380,452$ 35.36% Schools 149,409,367 30,132,128 7,026,556 172,514,939 64.64% 100.00% * The County has been approved for $75 million in Literary Loans. This amount will not be turned into permanent loans until all monies are drawn down for the three school projects approved for funding which are: Glen Cove and W.E. Cundiff Elementary Schools and the Roanoke County Career and Technology Center Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Chief Financial Officer Approved By Richard L. Caywood County Administrator Real Estate Taxes $129,080,327 $63,329,912 49.06% $135,025,000 $66,164,286 49.00% $2,834,374 4.28% Personal Property Taxes 44,500,000 3,580,536 8.05% 48,000,000 3,704,570 7.72% 124,034 3.35% Public Service Corp Base 5,500,000 5,812,954 105.69% 6,000,000 8,242,978 137.38% 2,430,024 29.48% Penalties & Interest on Property Taxes 1,350,000 775,871 57.47% 1,330,000 833,575 62.67% 57,704 6.92% Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 225,000 44,775 19.90% 170,000 35,372 20.81% (9,404) -26.59% Communication Taxes 2,625,000 1,483,016 56.50% 2,500,000 1,454,208 58.17% (28,808) -1.98% Local Sales Tax 17,000,000 9,733,570 57.26% 17,242,500 10,311,444 59.80% 577,874 5.60% Consumer Utility Tax 3,750,000 2,109,363 56.25% 3,750,000 2,125,232 56.67% 15,869 0.75% Business License Tax 9,100,000 4,007,754 44.04% 9,614,000 4,673,297 48.61% 665,543 14.24% Franchise Tax 750,000 0 0.00% 850,000 112 0.01% 112 100.00% Motor Vehicle License Fees 2,450,000 443,893 18.12% 2,475,000 475,740 19.22% 31,846 6.69% Taxes On Recordation & Wills 1,550,000 838,107 54.07% 1,450,000 1,000,983 69.03% 162,875 16.27% Utility License Tax 565,000 186,593 33.03% 555,000 240,840 43.39% 54,247 22.52% Hotel & Motel Room Taxes 2,050,000 1,185,451 57.83% 2,250,000 1,170,995 52.04% (14,456) -1.23% Taxes - Prepared Foods 6,450,000 3,487,430 54.07% 6,700,000 3,966,139 59.20% 478,709 12.07% Other Taxes 1,355,000 539,356 39.80% 1,180,000 475,814 40.32% (63,543) -13.35% Animal Control Fees 42,500 39,679 93.36% 42,500 38,151 89.77% (1,528) -4.01% Land and Building Fees 18,000 9,225 51.25% 18,650 17,168 92.05% 7,943 46.27% Permits 1,112,872 546,389 49.10% 1,119,040 566,305 50.61% 19,916 3.52% Fees 64,600 27,848 43.11% 64,600 44,054 68.19% 16,205 36.79% Clerk of Court Fees 127,000 89,315 70.33% 155,000 78,535 50.67% (10,780) -13.73% Photocopy Charges 210 0 0.00% 210 0 0.00%0 0.00% Fines and Forfeitures 558,500 266,103 47.65% 500,000 207,830 41.57% (58,274) -28.04% Revenues from Use of Money 1,229,586 862,903 70.18% 1,184,745 581,600 49.09% (281,303) -48.37% Revenues From Use of Property 185,014 139,661 75.49% 165,254 125,697 76.06% (13,964) -11.11% General Fund - C100 For the Eight Months Ending Saturday, February 28, 2026 Charges for Services 4,145,100 2,851,918 68.80% 4,725,100 2,615,409 55.35% (236,509) -9.04% Charges for Public Services 80,000 80 0.10% 80,000 (1,822) -2.28% (1,902) 104.39% Education Aid-State 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Reimb-Shared Programs Salem 1,396,800 681,627 48.80% 1,663,301 628,997 37.82% (52,630) -8.37% Miscellaneous Revenue 304,200 273,365 89.86% 361,050 334,074 92.53% 60,709 18.17% Recovered Costs 1,050,000 692,990 66.00% 975,000 657,320 67.42% (35,670) -5.43% Non-Categorical Aid 418,000 1,095,825 262.16% 418,000 1,136,033 271.78% 40,208 3.54% Shared Expenses 6,371,084 3,948,656 61.98% 7,077,599 4,263,432 60.24% 314,776 7.38% Welfare & Social Services-Categorical 5,425,000 2,665,917 49.14% 5,035,263 1,893,964 37.61% (771,953) -40.76% Other State Categorical Aid 2,523,710 2,000,779 79.28% 2,659,630 1,999,147 75.17% (1,633) -0.08% Welfare & Social Services 6,765,000 4,351,006 64.32% 6,950,000 4,759,268 68.48% 408,262 8.58% Education Aid-Federal 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Other Categorical Aid 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Other Financing Sources 33,487,987 0 0.00% 36,047,419 0 0.00%0 0.00% Transfers 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% General Fund - C100 For the Eight Months Ending Saturday, February 28, 2026 Legislative 275,874 219,127 79.43% 304,690 196,051 64.34% (23,076) -11.77% General & Financial Administration 10,707,832 7,211,840 67.35% 11,439,911 7,717,862 67.46% 458,504 5.99% Electoral Board & Officials 1,038,250 599,705 57.76% 1,068,158 556,250 52.08% (45,085) -8.13% Courts 1,937,153 1,141,271 58.91% 1,984,352 1,358,284 68.45% 215,016 15.85% Other Judicial Support 1,821,753 1,262,386 69.30% 1,903,611 1,346,425 70.73% 84,480 6.27% Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont 20,591,508 14,556,840 70.69% 22,472,008 15,103,018 67.21% 566,738 3.75% Fire and Rescue 25,972,455 18,451,669 71.04% 28,060,371 20,016,877 71.34% 1,644,558 8.24% Correction & Detention 12,868,428 7,836,331 60.90% 12,979,109 7,906,312 60.92% 58,668 0.74% Animal Control 1,307,776 855,676 65.43% 1,409,415 828,085 58.75% (27,591) -3.33% General Services Administration 1,431,285 1,005,960 70.28% 1,541,806 1,035,816 67.18% 35,602 3.44% Refuse Disposal 6,233,165 4,214,521 67.61% 6,403,636 4,192,014 65.46% (27,971) -0.67% Maint Buildings & Grounds 5,884,371 3,942,405 67.00% 6,278,903 4,055,799 64.59% 107,972 2.67% Engineering 2,862,027 1,744,493 60.95% 2,965,376 2,036,528 68.68% 291,438 14.32% Inspections 1,135,510 823,395 72.51% 1,211,315 782,622 64.61% (40,773) -5.21% Garage Complex 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Mental Health 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Public Health 767,419 551,276 71.84% 805,790 589,143 73.11% 37,867 6.43% Social Services Administration 10,890,884 7,030,097 64.55% 11,165,323 8,136,248 72.87% 1,107,003 13.61% Comprehensive Services Act 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Public Assistance 4,918,666 3,180,147 64.65% 5,187,550 3,169,335 61.10% (10,812) -0.34% Social Services Organizations 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Parks & Recreation 3,099,387 2,174,538 70.16% 3,138,600 2,295,553 73.14% 97,841 4.33% Library 5,230,613 3,317,041 63.42% 5,425,510 3,560,160 65.62% 237,209 6.71% Cultural Enrichment 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Planning & Zoning 2,007,941 1,171,141 58.33% 2,013,760 1,180,558 58.62% 12,581 1.10% Cooperative Extension Program 145,391 47,417 32.61% 145,391 21,596 14.85% (25,822) -119.57% Economic Development 718,907 523,299 72.79% 753,620 580,353 77.01% 30,773 5.68% Public Transportation 510,000 203,144 39.83% 510,000 53,449 10.48% (149,694) -280.07% Contribution to Human Service Organizations 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% General Fund - C100 For the Eight Months Ending Saturday, February 28, 2026 Employee Benefits 2,925,437 1,051,489 35.94% 2,974,648 1,165,666 39.19% 137,455 11.79% Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup 62,700 35,667 56.89% 62,700 31,276 49.88% (4,391) -14.04% Miscellaneous 10,683,516 7,896,282 73.91% 11,324,859 7,664,446 67.68% (231,836) -3.02% Tax Relief/Elderly & Handicapp 1,694,060 1,091,533 64.43%0 0 0.00% (1,091,533) 0.00% Refuse Credit Vinton 225,000 112,500 50.00% 225,000 116,915 51.96% 4,415 3.78% Board Contingency 32,542,525 0 0.00% 33,502,534 0 0.00%0 0.00% Unappropriated Balance 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Interfund Transfers Out 116,861,844 82,312,408 70.44% 122,709,078 86,401,130 70.41% 4,088,722 4.73% Intrafund Transfers Out 6,253,812 5,044,392 80.66% 8,366,836 7,133,799 85.26% 2,089,407 29.29% General Fund - C100 For the Eight Months Ending Saturday, February 28, 2026 ACTION NO. _______________ ITEM NO. __________________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid – February 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors -$ -$ 10,958,982.29$ Payroll 02/13/26 2,109,992.88 12,310.71 2,122,303.59 Payroll 02/27/26 2,299,303.89 10,507.17 2,309,811.06 Manual Checks - - - Grand Total 15,391,096.94$ A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO.___________________ ITEM NUMBER_______________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. : March 24, 2026 : Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 28-Feb-26 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASH INVESTMENT: JP MORGAN 10,303,552.30 HOMETRUST 2,670,637.71 12,974,190.01 GOVERNMENT: TRUIST CONTRA 2,980.00 TRUIST 2,000,000.00 ROCKEFELLER CONTRA (13,960.00) ROCKEFELLER 8,000,000.00 9,989,020.00 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION 28,003,585.53 ROCO EMA PORTFOLIO 1,144,481.88 ROCO EMA PORTFOLIO CONTRA 29,256.22 VA MINT 10,138,229.41 39,315,553.04 MONEY MARKET: ATLANTIC UNION BANK 0.00 HOMETRUST BANK 4,539,265.45 TRUIST 4,011,189.21 ROCKEFELLER 16,938,940.31 25,489,394.97 PUBLIC FUNDS: BANK OF BOTETOURT 8,045,073.86 8,045,073.86 TOTAL 95,813,231.88 03-24-2026 Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Work session with the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA) Board of Directors SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: This time has been set aside for the Board of Supervisors and South Peak CDA Board of Directors to discuss a project proposal. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.