Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/28/2026 - RegularPage 1 of 5 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: “Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board.” Roanoke County Board of Supervisors April 28, 2026 Page 2 of 5 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for April 28, 2026. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 6:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place them on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. BRIEFING 1. Briefing to discuss with the Board of Supervisors the Roanoke County Public Schools proposed fiscal year 2026-2027 budget. (Susan Peterson, Director of Finance, Roanoke County Public Schools) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution approving an interim Agreement between Roanoke County and G&H Contracting, Inc., regarding pre-construction services for the Hollins Fire Station. (George Assaid, Capital Projects Administrator) E. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public hearing for citizen comments on the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 -2036 Capital Improvement Program. (Steve Elliott, Budget Administrator) Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda April 28, 2026 Page 3 of 5 F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance amending the Code of the County of Roanoke by amending and re - enacting Chapter 2 Administration, Article VIII – Disaster and Emergency Management. (Doug Barber, Senior Assistant County Attorney) (First Reading and Request for Second Reading) G. SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Ordinance approving the disposition of real estate located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000). (Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) 2. Ordinance approving the disposition of real estate located at 3319 Westmoreland Drive, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 077.13 -05- 31.00-0000) and 3323 Westmoreland Drive, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 077.13-05-30.00-0000). (Rachel Lower, Deputy County Attorney) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) Larry Waldron – term to expire April 28, 2030 2. South Peak Community Development Authority Rick Pevarski – term to expire May 10, 2030 I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes – April 7, 2026 2. Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept a portion of Glenmary Drive (Route 778) into the VDOT Secondary Road System, Catawba Magisterial District. 3. The petition of Michelle and Brian Ellison to rezone approximately 5.06 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3169, and 3225 Bandy Road, Vinton Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Page 4 of 5 4.Request to amend the Board of Supervisors 2026 Meeting Calendar. 5.Resolution approving a third amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement between the County and G&H Contracting, Inc., regarding construction services for the Bonsack Fire Station. J.CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak. K.REPORTS 1.Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2.Outstanding Debt Report 3.Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of March 31, 2026 4.Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of March 31, 2026 5.Accounts Paid – March 2026 6. Statement of the Treasurer’s Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 2026 L.CLOSED MEETING 1.Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts. EVENING SESSION – 6:00 PM M.CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION N. SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Page 5 of 5 Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) 2. The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, and 3499 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) 3. The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (Second Reading and Public Hearing) O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. David F. Radford 2. Phil C. North 3. Martha B. Hooker 4. Paul M. Mahoney 5. Tammy E. Shepherd P. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing to discuss with the Board of Supervisors the Roanoke County Public Schools proposed fiscal year 2026 - 2027 budget SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Briefing for the Board of Supervisors regarding the Roanoke County Public Schools Proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budgets BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget process, the Roanoke County Public Schools presents a balanced budget for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. This briefing provides an overview of the Roanoke County Public Schools Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Budget. DISCUSSION: This time has been scheduled to provide the Board of Supervisors with a briefing on the Roanoke County Public Schools Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Budget. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this briefing. The budget approval and appropriation of funds will occur at a later meeting. Page 2 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors receive information regarding the Roanoke County Public Schools Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and Proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 During the March 31, 2026 School Board Meeting, the Roanoke County School Board received the following report on the Annual Budget for 2026-2 027 and voted to approve the 2026-2027 Annual Budget. Background The FY2026–2027 budget was developed through a series of work sessions focused on aligning available resources with the division’s operational needs and long-term financial sustainability. Early discussions centered on replacement planning and establishing a clear understanding of projected revenues, including state and local funding updates. As we progressed through the planning stages, the School Board reviewed key cost drivers, with particular emphasis on employee compensation and rising health insurance costs. Updated revenue projections and expenditure requirements were incorporated throughout the process to ensure the budgets were balanced and responsive to changing assumptions. A public hearing was held to provide the community with an opportunity to offer input prior to finalizing the proposed budget. Priority List Throughout the budget development process, a priority list was used to evaluate potential additions and reductions in a structured and transparent manner. The priority list served as a decision-making tool to help the School Board weigh competing needs against available funding. Items on the priority list included compensation adjustments, operational needs, and planned investments such as textbook adoption and equipment replacement. As revenue constraints became clearer, the list was refined to identify items that could be deferred, reduced, or removed to maintain a balanced budget. This approach allowed the School Board to make informed decisions by clearly understanding the financial impact of each option and the trade-offs required. The final proposed budget reflects those priorities that best support the division’s core instructional mission while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 The priorities result in the following changes and final budget for 2026-2027. Funds 2026 2027 Change I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the Finance team, our Directors, Dr. Nicely, and Dr. Soltis for their collaboration and support throughout this budget. Their collective efforts were instrumental in developing a thoughtful and balanced budget, and I am truly grateful for their partnership. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Priority List Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 State revenue (updated based on VDOE worksheet)8,381,507 Roanoke County revenue sharing (updated for population posted on Weldon Cooper 2/24) 3,724,914 Roanoke County revenue sharing CSA (offset by transfer to County)500,000 Roanoke County revenue reduced outside revenue sharing agreement (3,000,000) Church revenue (no impact, offset by payment to schools)114,921 Nonresident tuition increased due to participation 35,000 Fingerprinting fees 5,000 Health insurance (10.00% premium increase for employee)1 3,706,062 485,645 Employee raise (4.50% raise, including one step increase)1 3,649,789 VRS savings for teacher contribution rate reduction from 14.21% to 12.20% (based on 4.50% 1 (2,022,586) EEWP (Employee Extended Work Plan)1 409,070 Teacher substitute increase 1 - 200,000 Employees at top or over the scale longevity stipend of $1,000 1 132,500 Employees at top or over the scale longevity stipend VRS cost to include in creditable compensation 1 14,763 Middle school cross country stipends 1 17,750 Payroll lapse 1 (410,387) Online academy additional stipends 2 62,000 A-STEP teacher (2 FTE) (1 FTE moved from All-In VA grant ending 6/30/26)1 195,111 Payment to schools for church revenue (no impact, offset by equal revenue)1 114,921 Arbiter sports software package 2 34,239 Truancy and intervention specialist (1 FTE) (1 FTE moved from All-In VA grant ending 6/30/26)3 Administration 344,271 104,132 Payroll estimates are based on midrange and include VRS and FICA benefits. Items in green have a net zero budget impact. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Priority List Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 SEL program for elementary and middle schools 1 55,400 New REAP class behavior coaches (5 FTE)1 265,655 New FAACTS class instructional assistant (2 FTE)1 102,112 Speech language pathology assistant (1 FTE)1 67,291 Additional PKAT teacher in VPI grant (1 FTE)1 83,430 Move 1 preschool instructional assistant from local to VPI grant 1 (54,309) 54,309 Board certified behavior analysts (2 funded FTE and 1 unfunded FTE)2 179,888 89,944 Instructional assistant for PREP FAACTS (1 FTE)2 51,056 Preschool program manager contract extension from 240 to 260 days 2 11,349 PKAT teacher contract extension from 220 to 240 days 2 8,449 Elementary assistant principal (1 FTE)2 108,370 Math coach (2 FTE) (2 FTE moved from All-In VA grant ending 6/30/26)2 190,197 Division wide literacy coach (1 FTE) (1 FTE moved from All-In VA grant ending 6/30/26) 70% General Fund and 30% Grant Fund 2 60,051 25,736 Grade level coordinators 3 34,500 Middle school reading coaches (5 FTE) (5 FTE moved from All-In VA grant ending 6/30/26)2 455,317 Opportunity ready portfolio platform 2 40,000 Choral music resources 3 10,000 Student advisory council 3 500 Payroll estimates are based on midrange and include VRS and FICA benefits. Items in green have a net zero budget impact. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Priority List Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 Gifted resource teachers (1 FTE)2 83,430 Data aggregation software 2 75,000 Work based learning coordinator contract extension from 200 to 210 days 1 4,977 Allotment cost increase for inflation 1 1,972 CTE supervisor contract extension from 240 to 260 days 2 11,927 RCCTC uniforms for staff and students 3 41,200 Program stipend for industry career switchers (2 FTE, if needed)3 24,000 Custodial contract price increase 1 335,565 RCCTC operating costs for January through June 2027 1 86,000 Water Authority rate increases 1 80,000 Move the HVAC lead and technicians to a higher placement on the pay plan 1 72,042 Mowing contract price increase 1 10,998 Fire extinguisher replacements 2 50,000 HVAC parts price increases 2 50,000 - Door part price increases 2 20,000 Building material part price increases 2 20,000 Payroll estimates are based on midrange and include VRS and FICA benefits. Items in green have a net zero budget impact. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Priority List Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 Contribution to future capital projects fund 1 530,000 OPEB contribution 1 518,885 CSA transfer to County (offset by Roanoke County revenue sharing CSA)1 500,000 Insurance 1 60,000 Textbook Adoption Plan (English adoption)1 - 500,000 Fleet Replacement Fund Transfer 2 2,475,000 Capital Maintenance Program 2 250,000 Computer lease replacement for grades 9, middle school teachers and administrators, library circulation, and nutrition managers (move 6th grade to extended warranties and Technology 692,468 1,575,385 Superintendent - - School board 25,000 - Payroll estimates are based on midrange and include VRS and FICA benefits. Items in green have a net zero budget impact. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Priority List Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 State revenue 8,381,507 County revenue 1,224,914 Other miscellaneous local revenue 154,921 Priority request tier 1 8,540,052 725,496 1,994,490 Priority request tier 2 1,221,290 76,792 3,580,221 Priority request tier 3 - - 487,762 Payroll estimates are based on midrange and include VRS and FICA benefits. Items in green have a net zero budget impact. Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Expenditures by Fund and Functional Category Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 Administration, attendance,Pupil and School and Contingency Non-Fund General 152,463,823$ 9,501,340$ 10,587,217$ 21,263,427$ 71,620$ 357,917$ 19,580,245$ 14,888,862$ -$ -$ 228,714,451$ Fleet Replacement - - 50,759 - - - - 9,241 - 60,000 Instructional Resources 2,038,325 - - - - - - 1,125,650 - 3,163,975 Grant 9,412,168 75,900 22,200 22,200 - 22,200 - 365,850 4,391,134 - 14,311,652 Nutrition Services - - - - 8,628,655 - - 51,426 - 8,680,081 Student Activity 1,418,301 - - - - - 91,600 - 6,059,303 7,569,204 Major Projects - - - - - 840,255 - - - 840,255 Minor Projects 30,000 - - 1,600,000 - 200,000 - 100,000 - 1,930,000 Health Insurance - - - - - - - - 33,352,915 33,352,915 Dental Insurance - - - - - - - - 1,922,899 1,922,899 Risk Management - - - - - - - - 408,203 408,203 OPEB Trust - - - - - - - - 50,500 50,500 Roanoke County Public Schools 2026-2027 Annual Budget Capital Improvement Plan 2027 - 2040 Adopted by Roanoke County School Board March 31, 2026 Prior 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Major capital special projects -$ -$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 1,800,964$ 7,200,964$ County allocation for future bonds - - 20,000,000 - 20,000,000 20,000,000 - 20,000,000 20,000,000 - 20,000,000 45,946,000 165,946,000 700,833 725,424 752,750 644,694 - - - - - - - - 2,823,701 117,931 114,831 74,943 74,631 3,987 4,012 - - - - - - 390,335 Total funding sources 818,764$ 2,340,255$ 23,177,693$ 3,319,325$ 22,853,987$ 23,104,012$ 3,350,000$ 23,600,000$ 23,850,000$ 4,100,000$ 24,600,000$ 47,746,964$ 202,861,000$ Capital projects Project Fully Funded in Fiscal Year ↆ Total capital projects 818,764$ 2,340,255$ 23,177,693$ 3,319,325$ 22,853,987$ 23,104,012$ 3,350,000$ 23,600,000$ 23,850,000$ 4,100,000$ 24,600,000$ 47,746,964$ 202,861,000$ Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution approving an interim Agreement between Roanoke County and G&H Contracting, Inc., regarding pre- construction services for the Hollins Fire Station SUBMITTED BY: George G. Assaid Capital Projects Administrator APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Approval of an interim agreement with G&H Contracting, Inc., regarding pre-construction services for the Hollins Fire Station. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the County's adopted Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA) Guidelines, the Board of Supervisors must approve any interim or comprehensive agreement entered into pursuant to the PPEA between the County and a private entity. DISCUSSION: It is proposed that the County enter into an interim agreement with G&H Contracting, Inc. for pre-construction services (which include, among other services, site plan design, site permitting review and approvals, and building design development) for the Hollins Fire Station. The interim agreement, along with Exhibit 4, which provides further detail regarding the scope of services and corresponding values, is attached to this report for the Board's review. The entire interim agreement, with all attachments, exceeds 130 pages in length and can be reviewed at the following website: Page 2 of 2 <https://www.roanokecountyva.gov/bids.aspx?bidID=1308> FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, over the course of the agreement, the County will pay G&H Contracting, Inc. $221,275.00 for the agreed-upon pre-construction services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution, authorizing the execution of the interim Agreement. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA INTERIM AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR REGARDING PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE HOLLINS FIRE STATION THIS INTERIM AGREEMENT (the "Contract") is dated and effective as of this --- day of 2026 (the "Effective Date"), by and between County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the "County" or "Owner," and G&H Contracting, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor." RECITALS A. This Contract is entered into pursuant to Virginia's Public Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002 ("PPEA" or "the Act"), as set forth in Chapter 22.1, Title 56 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the County's PPEA guidelines (the "Guidelines") which have been adopted pursuant to the Act. B. The County accepted an unsolicited proposal for review and simultaneously solicited competing proposals pursuant to the PPEA and the Guidelines, for the design and redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station. C. After reviewing the proposals, the County selected the Contractor for pre- construction services, which services are the subject of this Contract. D. It is anticipated that the Parties will enter into a subsequent agreement for construction services. E. The legal address for the Owner and for the Contractor and the addresses for delivery of Notices and other project documents are as follows: Owner: County of Roanoke, Virginia Attn: Doug Blount, Deputy County Administrator Address: 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA 24018 Telephone: (540) 777-6321 Email: dblount@roanokecountyva.gov Contractor: G&H Contacting, Inc. Attn: Troy Henderson, Vice President Address: 1383 Southside Drive, Salem, VA 24153 Telephone: (540) 387-5059 Email: thenderson@ghcontracting.com Contractor's Virginia License#: 2705023767A FEIN 54-1504314 F. The Project is identified as and is entitled: Pre-construction Services for the Hollins Fire Station. General Project Description - Design of an approximately 16,420 sf. fire station building located on property owned by the County of Roanoke, containing 2.51 acres, located at 7401 Barrens Road, Roanoke, Virginia (Tax Map No. 27.13-04-01.00-0000). G. The Virginia licensed Architect/Engineer who has been employed by the Contractor to assist in the Project is identified as: Architect/Engineer: Hughes Associates Architects & Engineers Attn: Mike Woolwine Architect's Address: 3800 Electric Road, Suite 300, Roanoke, VA 24018 Telephone: (540) 342-4002 Email: mwoolwine@hughesae.com Civil Engineer: Caldwell White Associates Attn: Corbin White Engineer’s Address: 4203 Melrose Avenue, NW, Roanoke, VA 24017 Telephone: (540) 366-3400 Email: cwaroanoke@aol.com H. The Project Title indicated above is required to be shown for identification purposes on all project-related material and documents, including, but not limited to, Notices, Change Orders, Submittals, Requests for Information, Requests for Quotes, Field Orders, minutes of meetings, correspondence, Schedule of Values and Certificate for Payment, test reports, and related material. I. Unless otherwise stated, capitalized terms in this Contract shall have the meaning given them in the General Conditions of the PPEA Contract set forth in Exhibit 2 (the "General Conditions"). NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, and subject to the conditions herein set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by reference. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK: The Contractor agrees to furnish the pre-construction services required for the redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station for a subsequently agreed-upon Guaranteed Maximum Price (which will be set forth in a future agreement); the scope of such pre-construction services is further set forth in Exhibit 4. The pre-construction services provided by the Contractor include, but are not limited to, the development of Plans for the redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station, cost estimating, value engineering, scheduling, construction phasing, constructability review, confirming the Owner's program, schematic design, design development, development of construction documents, holding design review meetings with the Owner, receiving input from subcontractors as to building systems, means and methods of construction, site plan review and approval, and project review meetings with the Owner and regulatory review agencies. 3. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: This Contract shall consist of the following attached as Appendix A and are incorporated by reference: Exhibit 1 RFP 2026-050 Unsolicited PPEA Notice – Hollins Fire Station No. 5 Conceptual Phase PPEA Proposal, dated September 4, 2025 Exhibit 2 General Conditions of the PPEA Contract Exhibit 3 GMP Detailed Pricing (Dated 4/6/2026). The Parties acknowledge, however, that the pricing set forth in this exhibit will guide the development of the GMP, which will be finalized and agreed upon in a future agreement. Exhibit 4 Scope of Pre-Construction Services and Corresponding Schedule of Values Exhibit 5 Project Schedule THE GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS INTERIM AGREEMENT SHALL, IN ALL CASES, PREVAIL OVER ANY AND ALL INCONSISTENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 2025, NOTWITHSTANDING THEIR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE HEREIN-ABOVE. ANY AMBIGUITIES BETWEEN SUCH INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS AND THIS INTERIM AGREEMENT SHALL BE RESOLVED BY REFERENCE TO AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS INTERIM AGREEMENT. 4. TIME FOR COMPLETION: Design work and pre-construction coordination and permitting will be completed in accordance with the Project schedule (Exhibit 5). 5. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR: The County shall pay to the Contractor the total amount of two hundred and twenty-one thousand, two hundred seventy-five dollars ($221,275.00) for the Contractor's performance of the design services (as detailed on Exhibit 4). These services include, but are not limited to: (a) Schematic Design (SD) (b) Design Development (DD) (c) Construction Documents (CD) (d) Amended Schedule of Value at each above Phase (e) Amended Project Schedule, if needed Contractor will submit bills to the Owner on a monthly basis for the services completed. Monthly bills shall be calculated on a percentage basis, based upon the percentage of the phase(s) completed and the value assigned to each phase, as set forth in Exhibit 4. As noted above, at the completion of this Interim Agreement, the Parties intend to enter into a Comprehensive Agreement for the performance of all construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents for a guaranteed maximum contract price. 6. RECORDS MAINTENANCE: The Contractor and its subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and any other evidence, showing information of actual time devoted to and supporting the costs incurred. Such information shall be made available at their respective offices during the normal business hours during the Contract period and for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment from the Owner to the Contractor, for audit and inspection. Copies of such information shall be furnished to the Owner upon request. 7. AUDIT AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS: The Contractor and its subcontractors shall permit the authorized representatives of the Owner to inspect and audit all data and records of the Contractor in its subcontractors, relating to the performance of this Contract. 8. CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS: Any contractual claims shall be submitted in accordance with the contractual dispute procedures set forth in Section 47 of the General Conditions. 9. FAIR EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTING ACT: The Contractor, its agents, employees, assigns or successors, and any persons, firm, or agency of whatever nature with whom it may contract or make an agreement, shall comply with the provisions of the Virginia Fair Employment Contracting Act (Sec. 2.1-374 through Sec. 2.1-376 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended), the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. 10. NON-WAIYER: The failure of the Owner at any time to insist upon a strict performance of any of the terms, conditions, and covenants herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default in the terms, conditions, and covenants herein contained. 11. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT: (a) The Owner may terminate this Contract at any time for cause or convenience provided that it gives written notice of sixty (60) days to Contractor of such termination, which shall specify the effective date of such notice. In the event of such termination, Contactor shall be compensated for allowable costs through the date of written notification from the Owner to terminate. (b) The Contractor may at any time, by giving sixty (60) days written notice specifying the effective date, terminate this Contract for cause. Cause may include, but shall not be limited to, failure by the Owner to provide payment in a timely and proper manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, on the day and year written below, have executed this agreement in three (3) counterparts, each of which shall, without proof or accountancy for the other counterparts, be deemed an original thereof. CONTRACTOR: By: OWNER: COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By: Date: Date: Name: Name: Title: Title: Signature: Phone: Email: Signature: Phone: Email: Approved as to form: County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERIM AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROANOKE COUNTY AND G&H CONTRACTING, INC. REGARDING PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE HOLLINS FIRE STATION WHEREAS, the County accepted an unsolicited proposal for review and simultaneously solicited competing proposals pursuant to the Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA) for the design and redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station located at 7401 Barrens Road in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, following the receipt of proposals, the Board held a public hearing on February 24, 2026, to receive citizen comments on such proposals, as required by the County's adopted PPEA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, following the process of competitive negotiation, County staff selected G&H Contracting, Inc. as the party with whom to pursue the design and redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the County enter into an interim agreement with G&H Contracting, Inc. for pre-construction services, which includes, among other services, site plan design, site permitting review and approvals, and building design development for the Hollins Fire Station; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the County's adopted PPEA Guidelines, the Board of Supervisors must approve any interim or comprehensive agreement entered into pursuant to the PPEA between the County and a private entity; and WHEREAS, if approved, over the course of the agreement, the County will pay G&H Contracting, Inc. $221,275.00 for the agreed-upon pre-construction services; and WHEREAS, following the completion of the services outlined in the interim agreement, it is expected that the Board will again be asked to approve a comprehensive agreement for the redevelopment of the Hollins Fire Station. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that 1. The County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator is authorized to execute the proposed interim agreement with G&H Contracting, Inc. for pre-construction services for the Hollins Fire Station, which shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto as Attachment A, subject to any changes that may be approved by the County Attorney. 2. This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing for citizen comments on the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Operating Budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program SUBMITTED BY: Laurie Gearheart Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Conduct a public hearing for citizen comment on the proposed fiscal year 2026 -2027 Operating Budget and the fiscal year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. BACKGROUND: State Code requires a public hearing to receive written and oral comments on the proposed fiscal year 2026-2027 Operating Budget and the proposed fiscal year 2027 - 2036 Capital Improvement Program. This public hearing satisfies that requirement. DISCUSSION: This time has been set aside for a public hearing on the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 2026-2027 and the fiscal year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. A summary of the proposed budget was advertised in the Roanoke Times on April 21, 2026 and online in the Roanoke Rambler and in the Cardinal News on April 21, 2026. Budget documents can be found on the Roanoke County website at www.roanokecountyva.gov Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conducting the public hearing to satisfy State code requirements and receive citizen comments on the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 2026-2027 and the fiscal year 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Code of The County of Roanoke by Adding a New Article VIII - Disaster and Emergency Management SUBMITTED BY: Doug Barber Sr. Assistant County Attorney APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Amendment of Chapter 2 of the Roanoke County Code to include a new Article VIII - Disaster and Emergency Management BACKGROUND: As required by law, the Board adopted an Emergency Operations Plan (“EOP”) in July 2023, which includes an emergency management organizational structure with associated duties and responsibilities. However, the EOP is not activated until there is an official declaration of a state of emergency, and until that official declaration, the organizational structure and duties detailed in the EOP are not explicitly in place. DISCUSSION: By adding this proposed Disaster and Emergency Management Article to Chapter 2 of the County Code, the organizational structure and duties articulated in the EOP will be permanently implemented. In addition, the new Article will allow for planning and some emergency management actions to be taken before a state of emergency is declared, as early as when a “disaster threatens.” This Article will thus enhance the County’s ability to prepare for and react to emergency situations. FISCAL IMPACT: Page 2 of 2 There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of this ordinance and schedule a second reading for May 12, 2026 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2026 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE VIII – DISASTER AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT WHEREAS, as required by law, the Board adopted an Emergency Operations Plan (“EOP”) in July 2023, which includes an emergency management organizational structure with associated duties and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the EOP is not activated until there is an official declaration of a state of emergency, and until then the organizational structure and duties detailed in the EOP are not explicitly in place; and WHEREAS, by adding this proposed Disaster and Emergency Management Article to Chapter 2 of the County Code, the organizational structure and duties articulated in the EOP will be implemented and will allow for planning and some emergency management actions to be taken before a state of emergency is declared, as early as when a “disaster threatens”; and WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 28, 2026, and a second reading was held on May 12, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1. The Code of the County of Roanoke is amended by inserting the following Article VIII into Chapter 2: Chapter 2 - ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE VIII. - DISASTER AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Sec. 2-155. Short title. This article shall be known and referred to as the “Emergency Services and Disaster Ordinance of the County of Roanoke." Sec. 2-156. Purpose. (a) In accordance with Code of Virginia, § 44-146.19, Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 2000, Chapter 3.2, as amended, the purpose of this article is to establish an office that will ensure the complete and efficient utilization of all of the county's facilities to combat disasters which are defined in this article. (b) The department of emergency services established in this Article, shall be the county department charged with disaster and emergency management for the County of Roanoke and will be the coordinating department for all disaster and emergency management and services activities encompassed within the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 2000; it will be the working force through which the board of supervisors exercises the authority and discharges responsibilities for the County of Roanoke with regard to such law. (c) This article will not relieve any county department of the responsibilities or authority given to it in the Roanoke County emergency operations plan. Sec. 2-157. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation of this article: (1) Emergency services means the preparation for and the carrying out of functions, other than functions for which military forces are primarily responsible, to prevent, minimize and repair injury and damage resulting from disasters, together with all other activities necessary or incidental to the preparation for and carrying out of the foregoing functions. These functions include, without limitation, fire-fighting services, medical and health services, rescue, law enforcement coordination, engineering, warning services, communications, radiological, chemical and other special weapons defense, evacuation of persons from stricken areas, emergency welfare services, emergency transportation, emergency resource management, existing or properly assigned functions of plant protection, temporary restoration of public utility services, and other functions related to civilian protection. These functions also include the administration of approved state and federal disaster recovery and assistance programs. (2) Disaster means (i) any man-made disaster including any condition following an attack by any enemy or foreign nation upon the United States resulting in substantial damage of property or injury to persons in the United States and may be by use of bombs, missiles, shell fire, nuclear, radiological, chemical, or biological means or other weapons or by overt paramilitary actions; terrorism, foreign and domestic; also any industrial, nuclear, or transportation accident, explosion, conflagration, power failure, resources shortage, or other condition such as sabotage, oil spills, and other injurious environmental contaminations that threaten or cause damage to property, human suffering, hardship, or loss of life; and (ii) any natural disaster including any hurricane, tornado, storm, flood, high water, wind-driven water, tidal wave, earthquake, drought, fire, communicable disease or public health threat, or other natural catastrophe resulting in damage, hardship, suffering, or possible loss of life. (3) Director of disaster and emergency management ("director") shall mean the County Administrator of the County of Roanoke. (4) Coordinator of disaster and emergency management ("coordinator") shall mean the designated Fire & Rescue Department Deputy Chief, or the person appointed by the County Administrator of Roanoke County to fulfill those responsibilities. (5) Regulations shall include plans, programs and other emergency procedures deemed essential to disaster and emergency management services. Sec. 2-158. Organization and appointments. (a) The director has the authority to create an organization for disaster and emergency management utilizing, to the fullest extent, the existing departments within the county. The county administrator shall be the director of disaster and emergency management of this county and shall be responsible for their organization, administration and operation. (b) The organization shall consist of the following: (1) The department of emergency services shall be the county's office of disaster and emergency management under authority of the director. There shall be an executive head of the department of emergency services who shall be the director of the department of emergency services, who shall be known as the coordinator of disaster and emergency management for purposes of this article, and such assistants and other employees as are deemed necessary for the organization. The director has the authority to designate the existing Fire & Rescue Department as the department of emergency services contemplated herein. The director also has the authority to designated a Fire & Rescue Department Deputy Chief as the coordinator of disaster and emergency management contemplated herein. (2) The employees, equipment and facilities of all county departments will participate in the emergency services activity. Duties assigned to a county department shall normally be the same or similar to routine duties of the department. (3) Volunteer persons and agencies offering services to, and accepted by, the county. (c) The county administrator shall appoint a coordinator and a deputy coordinator as defined herein, and they shall be well versed and trained in planning operations involving the activities of many different agencies which will operate to protect the public health, safety and welfare in the event of danger from enemy action or disaster as defined in this article. (d) The director of disaster and emergency management shall appoint a deputy director to assume emergency duties in the event of his or her absence. Sec. 2-159. Emergency powers and duties. (a) Director of disaster and emergency management: (1) The director of disaster and emergency management may exercise the emergency powers and authority necessary to fulfill his or her general powers and duties as vested in him as chief administrative officer. The board of supervisors may convene to perform the legislative powers as the situation demands and shall receive reports relative to disaster and emergency management activities. Nothing in this article shall be construed as abridging or curtailing the powers or restrictions of the board of supervisors. (2) During any period when disaster threatens or when the county has been struck by disaster within the definition of this article, the director may promulgate such regulations as he deems necessary to protect life and property and preserve critical resources. Such regulations may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: a. Regulations prohibiting or restricting the movement of vehicles in order to facilitate the work of emergency services forces or to facilitate the mass movement of persons from critical areas within the county. b. Regulations pertaining to the movement of persons from areas deemed to be hazardous or vulnerable to disaster. c. Such other regulations necessary to preserve public peace, health and safety. (3) The director of disaster and emergency management shall order emergency services forces to the aid of other communities when required in accordance with mutual support agreements or state statutes; and he may request the state or political subdivision of the state to send aid to the county in case of disaster when conditions in the county are beyond the control of the local emergency services forces. (4) The director of disaster and emergency management may obtain vital supplies, equipment and other properties found lacking and needed for the protection of health, life and property of people; and bind the county for the fair value thereof. (5) The director of disaster and emergency management may require emergency services of any county officer or employee. If regular county forces are determined inadequate, the director may require the services of such other personnel as he can obtain and are available, including citizen volunteers. All duly authorized persons rendering emergency services shall be entitled to the privileges and immunities for regular county employees and other registered and identified emergency services and disaster workers. (6) The director of disaster and emergency management shall cause to be prepared a county emergency operations plan. (b) Coordinator of disaster and emergency management: The coordinator of disaster and emergency management shall be responsible to the director in regard to all phases of emergency services activities. Under the supervision of the director, the coordinator shall be responsible for the planning, coordination and operation of the disaster and emergency management activities in the county. His or her duties shall include, but will not be limited to, the following: (1) Development and coordination of plans for immediate use of all facilities, equipment, manpower and other resources of the county for the purpose of minimizing or preventing damage to persons and property and protecting and restoring to usefulness governmental services and public utilities necessary for the public health, safety and welfare. (2) Liaison with state and federal authorities and nearby political subdivisions as necessary to ensure most effective disaster preparedness and response capabilities. (3) Coordinating the recruitment of volunteer personnel and agencies to augment the personnel and facilities of the county for emergency management purposes. (4) Negotiating and concluding agreements with owners or persons in control of buildings or other property for use of such buildings as public shelters. (5) Through public information programs, educating the public in all disaster and emergency management matters pertaining to the protection of life and property. (6) Coordinating the activity of all other public and private agencies engaged in disaster and emergency management activities. (7) Assuming such activity as the director may direct to promote and execute county disaster and emergency management plans and programs. (8) Assuming all powers and functions of the director in the event of the director's and deputy director's absence, unavailability, or incapacity. Sec. 2-160. Emergency operations plan. A comprehensive emergency operations plan shall be developed for adoption by the board of supervisors and maintained under authority of the director. In the preparation of this plan, it is the intent that the services, equipment, facilities and personnel of all departments shall be utilized to the fullest extent. Each department assigned responsibilities in the basic plan shall be responsible for carrying out all duties and functions assigned to them. Each department shall formulate the operational plan for this service which, when approved, shall be an annex and a part of the basic emergency operations plan. 2. Any provision of the Roanoke County Code not specifically amended above shall remain in full force and effect as adopted. 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6697 MOUNT CHESTNUT ROAD, ROANOKE VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 075.00-02-36.00-0000) SUBMITTED BY: Allen Hayes Parks, Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors owns a 1.0 acre parcel with a residential cabin at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00 - 02-36.00-0000) that is currently vacant and not used for public purposes. BACKGROUND: As part of the acquisition of Happy Hollow Gardens, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors acquired a parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000). The parcel is 1.0 acre in size, and includes a vacant cabin, multiple outbuildings, a carport and a gazebo. The property is not used for public purposes. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors leased the property in the past, but the cabin is currently unoccupied. DISCUSSION: In an effort to dispose of the parcel, Roanoke County staff solicited bids from the public by advertisement in February 2026. Three bids were received. There has been a change to the draft deed (amended to a quitclaim deed) since the first reading on April 7, 2026. Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There are no costs to Roanoke County to sell the parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road. Assuming a sale of the property is finalized, Roanoke County would receive approximately $181,500.00 from the sale. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve this ordinance. 1 PREPARED BY: Rachel W. Lower, Deputy County Attorney VSB # 88094 Office of the County Attorney 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RETURN TO: Office of the County Attorney 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Consideration: $181,500.00 Assessed Value: $178,300.00 Title Insurance: ___________ Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Numbers: 075.00-02-36.00-0000 This instrument is exempt from the imposition of recordation taxes pursuant to Virginia Code § 58.1- 811(C)(4), and exempt from the imposition of fees for services rendered by a clerk or other court officer pursuant to Virginia Code § 17.1-266 THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, made and entered into the_____ day of ________________, 2026, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Grantor, and LINDA CORY, as Grantee; W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Grantor owns a parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000); and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Grantor to convey the said parcel of land to the Grantee. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) cash in hand paid by Grantee unto Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, QUITCLAIM, AND RELEASE unto Grantee, all of Grantor’s right, title, and Th i s d e e d h a s b e e n p r e p a r e d w i t h o u t t h e b e n e f i t o f a n e x a m i n a t i o n o f t i t l e . 2 interest in and to the hereinafter described property, lying in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: [insert legal description] TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever. This deed is made subject to all easements, reservations, restrictions, and conditions of record affecting title to the property herein conveyed. In compliance with the provisions of § 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approved the disposition of the properties subject to this Deed by Ordinance #_______________ adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia on _______________. In compliance with the provisions of Virginia Code § 15.2-1803, this deed is in a form approved by the attorney for the County of Roanoke, and furthermore is executed by a person authorized to act on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia pursuant to Ordinance #_______________ adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia on _______________. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: [Signatures and Notary Acknowledgement on Following Page] 3 GRANTOR: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: _________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Title: ________________________________ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________________, 2026, by _______________________________ on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public Commission Expires: Registration Number: Approved as to form: _____________________ County Attorney Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6697 MOUNT CHESTNUT ROAD, ROANOKE VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 075.00-02-36.00- 0000) WHEREAS, as part of the acquisition of Happy Hollow Gardens, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors acquired a parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000); and WHEREAS, the parcel is 1.0 acre in size, and includes a vacant cabin, multiple outbuildings, a carport and a gazebo; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors leased the property in the past, but the cabin is currently unoccupied, and the property is not used for public purposes; and WHEREAS, in an effort to dispose of the parcel, Roanoke County staff solicited bids from the public by advertisement in February 2026 and three bids were received; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 7, 2026, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 28, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 2 of 2 1. That the parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000) is hereby declared to be surplus and serves no ongoing public purpose. 2. That the sale of the parcel of land located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Number 075.00-02-36.00-0000) is hereby authorized in an amount no less than $181,500.00. 3. That the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in this matter as are necessary to accomplish this ordinance, including a deed, with such changes as approved by the County Attorney, and all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3319 WESTMORELAND DRIVE, ROANOKE, VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 077.13-05-31.00-0000) AND 3323 WESTMORELAND DRIVE, ROANOKE, VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 077.13- 05-30.00-0000) SUBMITTED BY: Allen Hayes Parks, Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors owns two parcels on Westmoreland Drive in Roanoke County. The parcels and undeveloped, and are not used for public purposes. BACKGROUND: Roanoke County purchased two adjacent parcels of land: (1) 3319 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-31.00-0000) pursuant to Ordinance #101398-6 and (2) 3323 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13- 05-30.00-0000) pursuant to Ordinance #090898-9. The parcels were originally purchased for the public purpose of facilitating an economic development project which never materialized. The parcels have remained undeveloped, and are not used for public purposes. In an effort to explore disposing of the two parcels, Roanoke County staff solicited bids from the public by advertisement in February 2026. No bids were received for either of the two parcels. Page 2 of 2 DISCUSSION: Roanoke County staff have proposed to transfer the two parcels to the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (hereinafter referred to as "the EDA"). This would allow the EDA's real estate broker to advertise and sell the two parcels on the private market. If the two parcels are sold, any funds received by the EDA would be returned to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. There has been a change to the draft deed (amended to a quitclaim deed) since the first reading on April 7, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no costs to Roanoke County to transfer the two parcels to the EDA. If the parcels are sold by the EDA on the private market, any funds from that sale would be returned to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors would need to appropriate those funds at a later date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve this ordinance. 1 PREPARED BY: Rachel W. Lower, Deputy County Attorney VSB # 88094 Office of the County Attorney 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RETURN TO: Office of the County Attorney 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Consideration: $0.00 Assessed Value: $81,000.00 Title Insurance: None Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID Numbers: 077.13-05-31.00-0000 & 077.13-05-30.00-0000 This instrument is exempt from the imposition of recordation taxes pursuant to Virginia Code § 58.1- 811(A)(3) and § 58.1-811(C)(4), and exempt from the imposition of fees for services rendered by a clerk or other court officer pursuant to Virginia Code § 17.1-266 THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, made and entered into the_____ day of ________________ 2026, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Grantor, and the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, as Grantee; W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Grantor owns two parcels of land located at 3319 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-31.00-0000) and 3323 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-30.00-0000); and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Grantor to convey the two parcels of land to the Grantee. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) cash in hand paid by Grantee unto Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby GRANT, Th i s d e e d h a s b e e n p r e p a r e d w i t h o u t t h e b e n e f i t o f a n e x a m i n a t i o n o f t i t l e . 2 CONVEY, QUITCLAIM, AND RELEASE unto Grantee, all of Grantor’s right, title, and interest in and to the hereinafter described properties, lying in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: PARCEL 1: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive, which point of BEGINNING is common corner to Lot 1 and Lot 4, Section 6, as shown on the map of Mount Vernon Heights, recorded in Plat Book 2, page 67, of the records of the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence leaving Mount Vernon Heights and along and with the west line of Lot 4, S. 10° 03′ W. 254.38 feet to a point; thence S. 72° 32′ E. 31.65 feet to a point; thence along and with a new division line through Lot 4, N. 15° 48′ 51″ E. 247.99 feet to a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive; thence along and with the south side of Westmoreland Drive, N. 68° 11′ W. 57.5 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and being the western portion of Lot 4, Section 6, of said Mount Vernon Heights Subdivision, and designated as New Lot 4-A as shown on plat of survey made by Jack G. Bess, Certified Land Surveyor, dated January 3, 1991, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk’s Office in Deed Book 1335, page 1524. Said real estate being further shown and described upon ‘Plat Showing Property of Kenneth A. Keeney & Catherine L. Keeney—being the Westerly Portion of Original Lot 4, Section #6, Survey #1, Mt. Vernon Heights (P.B. 2, Pg. 67), dated August 13, 1998, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Deed Book 1600, Page 1647. The property hereinabove conveyed is designated upon the Roanoke County Land Records as Parcel ID Number 077.13-05-31.00-0000, and has a street address of 3319 Westmoreland Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. This being all of the same real estate acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia from Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney by deed dated November 18, 1998, and recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Deed Book 1600, Page 1644. 3 PARCEL 2: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, containing 0.251 acres, more or less, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive, which point of beginning is the common corner to Lots 4 and 5 of Section 6 of Mount Vernon Heights, marked by an iron; thence leaving Westmoreland Drive and with the dividing line between Lots 4 and 5, S. 21 deg. 49′ W. 244.24 feet to a point; thence N. 72 deg. 32′ W. 31.66 feet (erroneously referred to in prior deed as 31.65 feet) to a point; thence N. 15 deg. 48′ 51″ E. 247.99 feet to a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive (said course having been identified as N. 15 deg. 56′ E. 249.3 feet in the deed of conveyance unto the Grantor herein); thence with the south side of Westmoreland Drive, S. 68 deg. 11′ E. 57.5 feet to the point of Beginning, and being the eastern portion of Lot 4, Section 6 as shown by the Map of Mount Vernon Heights, of record in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 2, page 67. Said real estate being further shown and described upon ‘Plat Showing Property of Michael W. Rose, Being Easterly Portion of Original Lot 4, Section #6, Survey #1, Mount Vernon Heights (P.B. 2, Pg. 67), dated August 13, 1998, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., Engineers- Surveyors-Planners, a copy of which is recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Deed Book 1594, Page 1151. The property hereinabove conveyed is designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Parcel ID Number 077.13-05-30.00-0000, and has a street address of 3323 Westmoreland Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. This being all of the same real estate acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia from Michael W. Rose and Traci Y. Rose by deed dated September 29, 1998, and recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Deed Book 1594, Page 1147. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever. This deed is made subject to all easements, reservations, restrictions, and conditions of record affecting title to the properties herein conveyed. In compliance with the provisions of § 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approved the disposition of the properties 4 subject to this Deed by Ordinance #_______________ adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia on _______________. In compliance with the provisions of Virginia Code § 15.2-1803, this deed is in a form approved by the attorney for the County of Roanoke, and furthermore is executed by a person authorized to act on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia pursuant to Ordinance #_______________ adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia on _______________. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: [Signatures and Notary Acknowledgement on Following Page] 5 GRANTOR: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: _________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Title: ________________________________ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________________ 2026, by _______________________________ on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public Commission Expires: Registration Number: Approved as to form: _____________________ County Attorney [Signatures and Notary Acknowledgement on Following Page] 6 GRANTEE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: _____________ Linwood P. Windley, Chairman STATE OF ____________________ CITY/COUNTY OF ________________, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________________ 2026, by Linwood P. Windley, Chairman of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia on behalf of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public Commission Expires: Registration Number: Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3319 WESTMORELAND DRIVE, ROANOKE, VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 077.13-05-31.00- 0000) AND 3323 WESTMORELAND DRIVE, ROANOKE, VA 24018 (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX PARCEL ID NUMBER 077.13-05-30.00- 0000) WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors owns two parcels of land on Westmoreland Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the first parcel is located at 3319 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-31.00-0000), and the purchase of this parcel was authorized by Ordinance #101398-6 (hereinafter referred to as “3319 Westmoreland Drive”); and WHEREAS, the second parcel is located at 3323 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-30.00-0000), and the purchase of this parcel was authorized by Ordinance #090898-9 (hereinafter referred to as “3323 Westmoreland Drive”); and WHEREAS, both parcels were originally purchased for the public purpose of facilitating an economic development project which never materialized; and WHEREAS, the parcels have remained undeveloped, and are not used for public purposes; and WHEREAS, to explore disposing of the two parcels, Roanoke County staff solicited bids from the public by advertisement in February 2026, and no bids were received for either of the two parcels; and Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff have proposed to transfer the two parcels to the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (hereinafter referred to as “the EDA”) to allow the EDA’s real estate broker to advertise and sell the two parcels on the private market; and WHEREAS, if the two parcels are sold, any funds received by the EDA would be returned to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 7, 2026, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 28, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That two parcels identified as 3319 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-31.00-0000) and 3323 Westmoreland Drive (Roanoke County Tax Parcel ID # 077.13-05-30.00-0000) are hereby declared to be surplus and serve no ongoing public purpose. 2. That transfer of the two parcels identified as 3319 Westmoreland Drive and 3323 Westmoreland Drive to the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia for $0.00 to allow the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia’s real estate broker to advertise and sell the two parcels on the private market is hereby authorized. 3. That the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents Page 3 of 3 and take such actions on behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in this matter as are necessary to accomplish this ordinance, including a deed or multiple deeds, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) and South Peak Community Development Authority SUBMITTED BY: Rhonda Perdue Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Confirmation of appointments BACKGROUND: Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals): Staff recommends Larry Waldron (alternate) for a four-year term to expire April 28, 2030. South Peak Community Development Authority: Rick Pevarski’s four-year term on this Authority expires May 10, 2026. It is the consensus of the Board to reappoint Mr. Pevarski for an additional four (4) year term which will expire May 10, 2030. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of all appointments. Page 1 of 1 A T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 28, 2026, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes – April 7, 2026 2. Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept a portion of Glenmary Drive (Route 778) into the VDOT Secondary Road System, Catawba Magisterial District. 3. The petition of Michelle and Brian Ellison to rezone approximately 5.06 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3169, and 3225 Bandy Road, Vinton Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) 4. Request to amend the Board of Supervisors 2026 Meeting Calendar. 5. Resolution approving a third amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement between the County and G&H Contracting, Inc., regarding construction services for the Bonsack Fire Station. Page 1 of 6 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of April 2026. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Before the meeting was called to order, an invocation/a moment of silence was observed. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call Present: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Absent: None Staff Present: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator; Doug Blount, Deputy County Administrator; Madeline Hanlon, Assistant County Administrator, Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney; Amy Whittaker, Public Information Officer and Rhonda D. Perdue, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. NEW BUSINESS Action No. 040726-1 Item C.1 1. Resolution approving the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) budget for fiscal year 2026-2027. (Jon Lanford, CEO, RVRA) Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Minutes April 7, 2026 Page 2 of 6 Action No. 040726-2 Item C.2 2. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for fiscal year 2026-2027. (Mike Stewart, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission) Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Action No. 040726-3 Item C.3 3. Resolution setting the allocation percentage for Personal Property Tax Relief in Roanoke County for the 2026 tax year. (Jessica Beemer, Director of Finance and Management Services) Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Action No. 040726-4 Item C.4 4. Resolution Authorizing Economic Development Incentive Agreements with (1) the County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and Elbit Systems of America - Night Vision LLC; and (2) the County of Roanoke, the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and Elbit Systems of America - Night Vision LLC. (Megan Baker, Director of Economic Development) Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Mahoney seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None D. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS Action No. 040726-5 Item D.1 1. Public hearing for citizen comments on the following items: Calendar Year 2026 Real Estate, Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. (Steve Elliott, Budget Administrator) Page 3 of 6 One (1) citizen was present and requested a decrease in the real estate tax rate. Action No. 040726-6.a-c Item D.2a-c 2. Request to adopt the following taxes rates: Action No. 040726-6.a Item D.2a (a) Resolution setting the tax rate on Real Estate in the County of Roanoke for the calendar year 2026 at $1.03 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation; Supervisor Mahoney moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Action No. 040726-6.b Item D.2b (b) Resolution setting the tax levy on Personal Property situate in the County of Roanoke for the calendar year 2026 at $3.40 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation; Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Mahoney seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Action No. 040726-6.c Item D.2c (c) Resolution setting the tax levy on a classification of personal property - Machinery and Tools - situate in the County of Roanoke for calendar year 2026 at $2.80 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation Supervisor Radford moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None E. CONSENT AGENDA Action No. 040726-7.a-e Item E.1-5 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY Page 4 of 6 THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY Action No. 040726-7.a Item E.1 1. Approval of minutes – March 24, 2026 Action No. 040726-7.b Item E.2 2. Observance and Proclamation of Thursday, April 23, 2026, as National Arbor Day in Roanoke County. Action No. 040726-7.c Item E.3 3. Ordinance approving the disposition of real estate located at 6697 Mount Chestnut Road, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 075.00-02- 36.00-0000). (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Action No. 040726-7.d Item E.4 4. Ordinance approving the disposition of real estate located at 3319 Westmoreland Drive, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 077.13-05- 31.00-0000) and 3323 Westmoreland Drive, Roanoke VA 24018 (Roanoke County Tax Parcel Id Number 077.13-05-30.00-0000). (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing) Action No. 040726-7.e Item E.5 5. Proclamation declaring April 12-18, 2026, as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week in the County of Roanoke. Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt all matters on the consent agenda. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None F. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to speak. No citizens were present. Page 5 of 6 G. REPORTS Action No. 040726-8 Item G.1-2 1. Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report Supervisor Radford moved to receive and file the reports that have been included with the agenda under Item G. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Paul M. Mahoney 2. David F. Radford 3. Phil C. North 4. Martha B. Hooker 5. Tammy E. Shepherd Supervisors were offered the opportunity to share comments and provide updates to their peers and the public on items of interest to them. I. WORK SESSION 1. Work session with the Board of Supervisors to provide Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) training. (Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney) J. CLOSED MEETING Action No. 040729-9 1. Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts. Supervisor Shepherd moved to go to closed session. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None K. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION Action No. 040726-10 Page 6 of 6 In the closed session just concluded, nothing was discussed except the matter which was identified in the motion to convene in closed session. Only those matters lawfully permitted to be discussed under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed. Supervisor Hooker moved to adopt the certification resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None L. ADJOURNMENT Action No. 040726-11 Supervisor Mahoney moved to adjourn the meeting. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved. Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd Nays: None Submitted by: Approved by: __________________________ __________________________ Richard L. Caywood Tammy E. Shepherd Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Chair Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.2 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: Page 2 of 2 2025 to Salem Realty LLC; Frito Realty LLC. County staff inspected the County-owned portion of Glenmary Drive with VDOT staff in late 2024 and determined that repairs were needed to bring the roadway up to VDOT standards. Roanoke County completed repairs in 2025. DISCUSSION: The facility located at 5374 Glenmary Drive was occupied on April 1, 2026, and now meets VDOT trip generation requirements for acceptance into the Secondary System of State Highways. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Once the roadway is accepted by VDOT, Roanoke County will no longer need to maintain this portion of Glenmary Drive. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolution requesting that VDOT accept a portion of Glenmary Drive into the Secondary System of State Highways. Appalachian Power Company Novozymes Biologicals Tecton Products Salem Realty LLC; Frito Realty LLCRoanoke County EDA Roanoke County Economic Development Authority Glenmary Drive Vicinity Map Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Catawba Magisterial District NApril 2026 Roadway proposed for acceptance COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Form AM 4.3 Form AM 4.3 (Rev 03/31/2026) by Resolution of the governing body adopted 4/28/2026 In Roanoke County ICR ID: 43496466 SSR Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways CHANGE TYPE RTE NUM & STREET NAME CHANGE DESCRIPTION FROM TERMINI TO TERMINI LENGTH NUMBER OF LANES RECORDAT ION REFERENC E ROW WIDTH Addition Rt. 778 - Glenmary Drive Local Government Facility §33.2-705 Intersection with private side street End of Cul-de-sac 0.0970 2 60 Addition Rt. 778 - Glenmary Drive Local Government Facility §33.2-705 Corporate Circle, Route 1448 Intersection with private side street 0.3020 2 60 The following VDOT Form AM-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes to the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Official):__________________________________________________________ Project/Subdivision: Glenmary Drive Extension 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF A PORTION OF GLENMARY DRIVE IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (VDOT) SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a representative of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has advised this Board that the street meets the requirements established by VDOT’s Subdivision Street Requirements; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1)The Board hereby requests that VDOT add the street described on the attached Form AM-4.3 to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to Virginia Code § 33.2-705. 2)The Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right -of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills, and drainage. 3)The Board guarantees the performance of the street requested herein to become part of the Secondary System of State Highways for a period of one year from the date of the acceptance of the referenced street by the VDOT into the Secondary System of State Highways. The Board will completely reimburse all costs incurred by 2 VDOT, up to $16,000.00, to repair any faults in the workmanship or materials of the referenced street and related drainage facilities as determined exclusively by VDOT. 4) A certified copy of this resolution shall be forwarded to the VDOT Salem Resident Engineer. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.3 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: . That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for May 26, 2026. . That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 6-5/2026 3 Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. No major change to the property would take place outside of location of minimal sheds/stable structures and fencing. There is no impact on public services, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and or fire and rescue. Michelle Ellison We are requesting to rezone our property from residential to agricultural. This rezoning will be more in line with the immediate community and long term preservation of the areas historically agricultural and rural land use. This will ensure that the properties in the area remain spaced out providing ample space for forestry and open land preservation. This zoning is also more in character with the property and surrounding neighborhood. Our intent upon purchasing a home in rural Roanoke and this property in particular was to provide preservation to a historical home and area while providing an open and diverse space for our children to develop skills and characteristics not provided to them in todays standard society. Our purchase of this 100+ year old home has already provided beautification to the area. We intend to continue to nurture and develop the land, bringing back more character and historical use to the property. Historical use of the land has included goats and chickens. Future plans are to use a portion of the land for orchards and crop and floral growth. Create a mini farm for our growing children with chickens, a horse barn, a small amount of sheep and goats. The land provides ample space for grazing through the forested acres. Lands surrounding the property are already in use for agricultural purposes and this continued preservation of this land will keep in line with the surrounding character and charm of the Mount Pleasant area. As the property's unique terrain and power line path does not align with development of additional homes, this does not impact future development on the land. 6 ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site l. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: 3/6/26 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner’s Signature Date Michelle Ellison 3/6/26 SCALE CONCEPT PLAN Power line access Septic system and drainfield Topography Local Zoning PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 3169 and 3225 Bandy Road - Aerial Map Vantor, Roanoke County 0 0.04 0.090.02 mi 0 0.07 0.140.04 km 1:3,413 NC DE 3169 and 3225 Bandy Road - Future Land Use Map Roanoke CountyDevelopment Neighborhood Conservation Future Land Use 0 0.04 0.090.02 mi 0 0.07 0.140.04 km 1:3,413 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 AR R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S AR R1 R1 ARR2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R2 AR R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1R1 3169 and 3225 Bandy Road - Zoning Map Roanoke County Zoning AR R1 R2 0 0.04 0.090.02 mi 0 0.07 0.140.04 km 1:3,413 Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.4 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: FISCAL IMPACT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RO Regular meetings of the Board of Supervisors are held at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, SW, Roanoke, VA 24018. The meeting dates are set forth below with public hearings scheduled for 6:00 p.m. unless otherwise advertised. Any change to this schedule will be advertised at least two weeks in advance. Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 1:00 pm (Organizational Meeting) Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, January 27, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, February 10, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, March 10, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, April 7, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, June 23, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, July 14, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, August 18, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, September 8, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, October 13, 2026, at 2 pm Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, November 17, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Tuesday, December 15, 2026, at 2 pm and 6 pm Organizational Meeting Tuesday, January 12, 2027, at 1 pm Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Amended 2026 Meeting Schedule Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I.5 MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: BACKGROUND: Page 2 of 2 services. On October 10, 2023, the Board approved a comprehensive agreement with G&H for construction services, which included site development, building construction, and off - site stormwater and signalization improvements for the Bonsack Fire Station. Under the comprehensive agreement, the County paid G&H $8,012,308 for the agreed -upon construction services. On December 17, 2024, the Board approved an amendment to the comprehensive agreement with G&H to design and install a stormwater pump from the detention facility to an existing on-site drainage ditch. Under the comprehensive agreement, the County paid G&H $58,213.00 for the agreed-upon design and construction services. On April 8, 2025, the Board approved an amendment to the comprehensive agreement with G&H to return unused allowances. Under the comprehensive agreement, G&H credited the County $7,223.23. DISCUSSION: During construction, G&H made concrete slab repairs requiring the County to incur additional third-party testing expenses. G&H has agreed to a $3,000.00 reduction in the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) to reimburse the County for these costs. The GMP is decreased to $8,060,297.77. FISCAL IMPACT: The associated deductive change order for $3,000.00 will be returned to the project's contingency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board, by resolution, approve the amended agreement. 4.2.2026 John R. Garrett liH (Jo~ G. & H. Contracting, Inc. 1383 Southside Drive Salem, Virginia 241 53 Phone: (540) 387-5059 Fax: (540) 387-3394 PCCO #003 Proj ect: 23-2063 -Bonsack Fire Station #12 1485 Mexico Way Roanoke, Virginia 240 12 Prime Contract Change Order #003: F&R Cone. lnsp Credit TO: DATE CREATED: CONTRACT STATUS: DESIGNATED REVIEWER: DUE DATE: INVOICED DATE: SCHEDULE IMPACT: REVISED SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE: C ONTRACT FOR: DESCRIPTION: Roanoke County 4/0212026 Approved 23-2063:Bonsack Fire Station #12 FROM: CREATED BY: REVISION : REVIEWED BY: REVIEW DATE: PAID DATE: EXECUTED: SIGNED CHANGE ORDER RECEIVED DATE : TOTAL AM OUNT: G & H Cont.ractlng, Inc. 1383 Southside Drive S alem , Virginia 24 153 Riley Kennedy (G & H Contracting, Inc.) 0 04/02/2026 No ($3,000.00) This CO is a deduct PCCO to B onsack Fire Station #12 for ($3,000.00) for F&R Concrete Repair inspections. ATTACHMENTS: POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDERS IN THIS CHANGE ORDER· PCO# I Title I Schedule Impact Amount 003 I F&R Concrete Repair lnsp I ($3,000.00) Total: ($3,000.00) CHANGE ORDER LINE ITEMS: PCO # 003· F&R Concrete Reoair lnsp # I Budget Code I Description Amount 1 I 0 1-030.0 ArchitecUEngineer Fees.Other I Deduct to Roanoke County $(3,000.00) T he original (Contract Sum) Net change by previously authori zed Change Orders The contract sum prior to this Change Order was The contract sum will be decreased by this Change Ord er in the amount of The new contract sum including this Change Order will be The contract time will not be ch anged by this Change Order. (Hughes Assoc Arch. & Roanoke County Engineers) DATE OWNER SIGNATURE G . & H. Contracting , Inc. P age 1 of 1 DATE Grand Total: G & H Contracting, Inc. 1383 Southside Drive $(3,000.00) $8,012,308.00 $50,989.77 $8,063,297.77 ($3,000.00) $8,060,297.77 Print ed On: 4/2/2026 12:39 PM EXHIBIT 1 1 THIRD AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT (the “Change Order”) is made and entered into as of April ___, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the “County” or “Owner,” and G&H Contracting, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor” and modifies the scope of the Work, which term is defined in the Comprehensive Agreements dated October 10, 2023, between the County and the Contractor (the “Comprehensive Agreement”). Terms not defined in the Amendment have the meaning given to them in the Comprehensive Agreement. RECITALS: A.The County has directed the Contractor to perform the scope of the Work as described in Potential Change Order #003, which is attached to and made part of this Change Order as Exhibit 1. B.The Guaranteed Maximum Price shall be decreased by $3,000.00 for the Work described in Exhibit 1. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the Parties and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1.The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by reference. 2.The scope of the Work described in Exhibit 1 is added to the scope of the Work under the Contract Documents. 3.The Guaranteed Maximum Price shall be decreased by $3,000.00 with the new Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) of $8,060,297.77. 4.Except as amended herein, the Comprehensive Agreement remains in full force and effect. [Signatures appear on the following page.] 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, on the day and year written below, have executed this Amendment in three (3) counterparts, each of which shall, without proof or accountancy for the other counterpart, be deemed an original thereof. CONTRACTOR: OWNER: COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By: G&H Contracting, Inc. By: County of Roanoke Date: Date: Name: Troy Henderson Name: Richard L. Caywood Title: Vice President Title: County Administrator Signature: Signature: Phone: 540-387-5059 Phone: 540-772-2004 Email: thenderson@ghcntracting.com Email: rcaywood@roanokecountyva.gov Approved as to form: County Attorney Page 1 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 RESOLUTION APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND G&H CONTRACTING, INC. REGARDING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE BONSACK FIRE STATION WHEREAS, at the County Administrator's direction, a request for proposals pursuant to the Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA) was issued for the construction of a new County fire station, which will be located at 1465 Mexico Way, NE, in the City of Roanoke. The fire station shall be known as the Bonsack Fire Station; and WHEREAS, following the receipt of proposals, the Board held a public hearing on October 20, 2022, to receive citizen comments on such proposals, as required by the County's adopted PPEA guidelines. After the public hearing and the competitive negotiation process, County purchasing staff selected G&H Contracting, Inc. (G&H) as the party with whom to pursue the design and construction of the Bonsack Fire Station ; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023, the Board approved an interim agreement with G&H for pre-construction services, including site plan design, site permitting review and approvals, and building design development for the Bonsack Fire Station. Pursuant to the interim agreement, the County paid G&H $367,950 for the agreed -upon pre- construction services; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2023, the Board approved a comprehensive agreement with G&H for construction services, which included site development, building construction, and off-site stormwater and signalization improvements for the Page 2 of 3 Bonsack Fire Station. Under the comprehensive agreement, the County paid G&H $8,012,308 for the agreed-upon construction services; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2024, the Board approved an amendment to the comprehensive agreement with G&H to design and install a stormwater pump from the detention facility to an existing on-site draining ditch; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 2025, the Board approved an amendment to the comprehensive agreement with G&H to return to the County the remaining allowance funds; and WHEREAS, during construction, G&H made concrete slab repairs requiring the County to incur additional third-party testing expenses. G&H has agreed to reimburse the county for additional testing expenses; and WHEREAS, the proposed third amendment to the comprehensive agreement reimburses the County in the amount of $3,000.00. The Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) is decreased to $8,060,297.77; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Board approve this third amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement, such approval being required pursuant to Section VIII of the County’s adopted PPEA guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. The proposed third amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement is hereby approved. 2. The Board authorizes the County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, any of whom may act, to Page 3 of 3 execute the agreement in such form as is approved by the County Attorney. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Mahoney to adopt the resolution; seconded by Supervisor North and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd, Radford NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Richard L. Caywood, P.E. County Administrator / Clerk to the Board of Supervisors CC: George G. Assaid, Capital Projects Administrator Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney Capital Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves Audited balance as of June 30, 2025 31,213,980 $ -$ -$613,094 $ Approved Sources: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - 50,000 - 1,420,700 Addition from 2024-25 close out and reimbursements of completed projects - - - 147,219 Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 121625-5) 1,448,997 680,479 Approved Uses: Appropriated from 2025-26 budget (Ordinance 052725-2) - - - (1,746,047) Items for Brian Epperley memorial - (1,282) - - Huntridge Road Traffic (Resolution 011326-6) (17,643) Deer Culling (25,000) Balance at April 28, 2026 32,662,977 $ 12.0% 6,075 $ 680,479 $ 434,966 $ County of Roanoke Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Fiscal Year 2025-2026 General Government Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Audited Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2025 Additions Deletions April 28, 2026 Debt type: VPSA School Bonds 109,321,388$ -$ 7,026,556$ 102,294,832$ Lease Revenue Bonds 72,515,000 20,040,000 4,715,000 87,840,000 Temporary Literary Loans*31,674,051 31,581,511 - 63,255,562 Subtotal 213,510,439 51,621,511 11,741,556 253,390,394 Premiums 13,244,796 1,709,584 - 14,954,380 226,755,235$ 53,331,095$ 11,741,556$ 268,344,774$ Summary by entity: County 77,345,868$ 21,749,584$ 4,715,000$ 94,380,452$ 35.17% Schools 149,409,367 31,581,511 7,026,556 173,964,322 64.83% 100.00% * The County has been approved for $75 million in Literary Loans. This amount will not be turned into permanent loans until all monies are drawn down for the three school projects approved for funding which are: Glen Cove and W.E. Cundiff Elementary Schools and the Roanoke County Career and Technology Center Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart Chief Financial Officer Approved By Richard L. Caywood County Administrator Real Estate Taxes $129,080,327 $63,502,696 49.20% $135,025,000 $66,388,435 49.17% $2,885,739 4.35% Personal Property Taxes 44,500,000 3,788,648 8.51% 48,000,000 3,986,331 8.30% 197,683 4.96% Public Service Corp Base 5,500,000 5,812,954 105.69% 6,000,000 8,242,978 137.38% 2,430,024 29.48% Penalties & Interest on Property Taxes 1,350,000 825,736 61.17% 1,330,000 914,682 68.77% 88,946 9.72% Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 225,000 44,775 19.90% 170,000 35,372 20.81% (9,404) -26.59% Communication Taxes 2,625,000 1,697,423 64.66% 2,500,000 1,653,819 66.15% (43,604) -2.64% Local Sales Tax 17,000,000 10,907,600 64.16% 17,242,500 11,507,927 66.74% 600,327 5.22% Consumer Utility Tax 3,750,000 2,666,031 71.09% 3,750,000 2,634,812 70.26% (31,219) -1.18% Business License Tax 9,100,000 8,354,359 91.81% 9,614,000 8,647,945 89.95% 293,586 3.39% Franchise Tax 750,000 0 0.00% 850,000 112 0.01% 112 100.00% Motor Vehicle License Fees 2,450,000 478,543 19.53% 2,475,000 515,295 20.82% 36,752 7.13% Taxes On Recordation & Wills 1,550,000 918,019 59.23% 1,450,000 1,111,116 76.63% 193,097 17.38% Utility License Tax 565,000 344,291 60.94% 555,000 365,754 65.90% 21,464 5.87% Hotel & Motel Room Taxes 2,050,000 1,317,165 64.25% 2,250,000 1,205,027 53.56% (112,138) -9.31% Taxes - Prepared Foods 6,450,000 4,140,044 64.19% 6,700,000 4,507,700 67.28% 367,656 8.16% Other Taxes 1,355,000 643,601 47.50% 1,180,000 546,482 46.31% (97,119) -17.77% Animal Control Fees 42,500 55,651 130.94% 42,500 42,154 99.19% (13,497) -32.02% Land and Building Fees 18,000 9,578 53.21% 18,650 18,114 97.12% 8,535 47.12% Permits 1,112,872 597,003 53.65% 1,119,040 632,722 56.54% 35,719 5.65% Fees 64,600 56,424 87.34% 64,600 65,397 101.23% 8,973 13.72% Clerk of Court Fees 127,000 100,328 79.00% 155,000 89,075 57.47% (11,253) -12.63% Photocopy Charges 210 0 0.00% 210 0 0.00%0 0.00% Fines and Forfeitures 558,500 303,221 54.29% 500,000 229,735 45.95% (73,486) -31.99% Revenues from Use of Money 1,229,586 914,854 74.40% 1,184,745 603,385 50.93% (311,469) -51.62% Revenues From Use of Property 185,014 154,306 83.40% 165,254 137,099 82.96% (17,207) -12.55% General Fund - C100 For the Nine Months Ending Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Charges for Services 4,145,100 3,285,589 79.26% 4,725,100 3,050,203 64.55% (235,386) -7.72% Charges for Public Services 80,000 80 0.10% 80,000 (1,822) -2.28% (1,902) 104.39% Education Aid-State 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Reimb-Shared Programs Salem 1,396,800 858,360 61.45% 1,663,301 1,115,873 67.09% 257,513 23.08% Miscellaneous Revenue 304,200 318,733 104.78% 361,050 357,914 99.13% 39,182 10.95% Recovered Costs 1,050,000 821,834 78.27% 975,000 789,169 80.94% (32,664) -4.14% Non-Categorical Aid 418,000 1,121,541 268.31% 418,000 1,165,637 278.86% 44,096 3.78% Shared Expenses 6,390,718 4,595,289 71.91% 7,077,599 4,873,472 68.86% 278,183 5.71% Welfare & Social Services-Categorical 5,425,000 2,887,401 53.22% 5,035,263 2,988,719 59.36% 101,318 3.39% Other State Categorical Aid 2,523,710 2,000,779 79.28% 2,659,630 1,999,147 75.17% (1,633) -0.08% Welfare & Social Services 6,765,000 4,801,673 70.98% 6,950,000 5,256,525 75.63% 454,852 8.65% Education Aid-Federal 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Other Categorical Aid 0 0 0.00%0 0 0.00%0 0.00% Other Financing Sources 33,487,987 0 0.00% 36,047,419 0 0.00%0 0.00% Transfers 0 0 0.00% 50,000 50,000 100.00% 50,000 100.00% General Fund - C100 For the Nine Months Ending Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Legislative 275,874 232,723 84.36% 304,690 212,146 69.63% (20,577) -9.70% General & Financial Administration 10,707,832 8,003,864 74.75% 11,439,911 8,526,805 74.54% 499,929 5.89% Electoral Board & Officials 1,038,250 638,156 61.46% 1,068,158 643,274 60.22% 3,488 0.54% Courts 1,937,153 1,270,317 65.58% 1,984,352 1,485,948 74.88% 213,635 14.40% Other Judicial Support 1,821,753 1,417,250 77.80% 1,903,611 1,498,945 78.74% 91,541 6.11% Law Enforcement & Traffic Cont 20,591,508 16,187,244 78.61% 22,472,008 16,768,394 74.62% 581,311 3.47% Fire and Rescue 25,972,455 20,583,103 79.25% 28,060,371 22,156,981 78.96% 1,662,160 7.52% Correction & Detention 12,868,428 8,727,659 67.82% 12,979,109 8,658,087 66.71% (79,035) -0.92% Animal Control 1,307,776 955,976 73.10% 1,409,415 931,362 66.08% (24,614) -2.64% General Services Administration 1,431,285 1,119,069 78.19% 1,541,806 1,152,235 74.73% 38,882 3.37% Refuse Disposal 6,233,165 4,700,109 75.40% 6,403,636 4,679,508 73.08% (17,786) -0.38% Maint Buildings & Grounds 5,896,871 4,378,385 74.25% 6,278,903 4,491,524 71.53% 106,077 2.37% Engineering 2,862,027 1,969,602 68.82% 2,965,376 2,262,162 76.29% 292,560 12.94% Inspections 1,135,510 916,451 80.71% 1,211,315 878,249 72.50% (38,202) -4.35% Garage Complex 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Mental Health 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Public Health 767,419 747,343 97.38% 805,790 794,577 98.61% 47,234 5.94% Social Services Administration 10,890,884 7,837,040 71.96% 11,165,323 9,111,087 81.60% 1,257,454 13.83% Comprehensive Services Act 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Public Assistance 4,918,666 3,550,865 72.19% 5,187,550 3,575,291 68.92% 24,426 0.68% Social Services Organizations 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Parks & Recreation 3,086,887 2,410,436 78.09% 3,138,600 2,561,194 81.60% 137,089 5.41% Library 5,230,613 3,722,369 71.17% 5,425,510 3,970,417 73.18% 231,851 5.88% Cultural Enrichment 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Planning & Zoning 2,007,941 1,295,729 64.53% 2,066,760 1,387,751 67.15% 20,435 1.61% Cooperative Extension Program 145,391 47,441 32.63% 145,391 21,625 14.87% (25,816) -119.38% Economic Development 718,907 584,143 81.25% 753,620 633,411 84.05% 51,439 8.30% Public Transportation 510,000 203,469 39.90% 510,000 53,651 10.52% (149,817) -279.24% Contribution to Human Service Organizations 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% General Fund - C100 For the Nine Months Ending Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Employee Benefits 2,925,437 1,202,891 41.12% 2,974,648 1,342,668 45.14% 149,479 11.13% Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup 62,700 39,294 62.67% 62,700 33,398 53.27% (5,896) -17.65% Miscellaneous 10,683,516 8,750,367 81.91% 11,324,859 9,003,980 79.51% 253,613 2.82% Tax Relief/Elderly & Handicapp 1,694,060 1,091,533 64.43% 0 0 0.00% (1,091,533) 0.00% Refuse Credit Vinton 225,000 168,750 75.00% 225,000 116,915 51.96% (51,835) -44.34% Board Contingency 32,542,525 0 0.00% 33,499,534 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Unappropriated Balance 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Interfund Transfers Out 116,881,478 91,441,513 78.23% 122,709,078 95,858,451 78.12% 4,416,938 4.61% Intrafund Transfers Out 6,253,812 5,346,747 85.50% 8,366,836 7,442,058 88.95% 2,095,311 28.15% General Fund - C100 For the Nine Months Ending Tuesday, March 31, 2026 ACTION NO. _______________ ITEM NO. __________________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid – March 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors -$ -$ 11,462,369.34 $ Payroll 03/13/26 2,149,182.30 14,396.15 2,163,578.45 Payroll 03/27/26 2,270,885.49 11,244.03 2,282,129.52 Manual Checks - - - Grand Total 15,908,077.31 $ A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO.___________________ ITEM NUMBER_______________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. : April 28, 2026 : Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 31-Mar-26 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASH INVESTMENT: JP MORGAN 4,922,383.11 HOMETRUST 3,366,992.42 8,289,375.53 GOVERNMENT: TRUIST CONTRA (14,280.00) TRUIST 2,000,000.00 ROCKEFELLER CONTRA (52,460.00) ROCKEFELLER 12,000,000.00 13,933,260.00 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION 28,093,318.34 ROCO EMA PORTFOLIO 1,148,358.80 ROCO EMA PORTFOLIO CONTRA 25,766.41 VA MINT 10,172,138.76 39,439,582.31 MONEY MARKET: HOMETRUST BANK 4,552,758.88 TRUIST 4,016,608.83 ROCKEFELLER 8,971,666.78 17,541,034.49 PUBLIC FUNDS: BANK OF BOTETOURT 8,070,943.14 8,070,943.14 TOTAL 87,274,195.47 4-28-26 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, April 28, 2026 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 250 acres from residential to agricultural. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agriculture as “[t]he use of land for the production of food and fiber, including farming, dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry. A garden and residential chicken keeping, accessory to a residence, shall not be considered agriculture.” The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a commercial stable as “[t]he boarding, breeding or raising of horses or ponies not owned by the owner or occupant of the property or riding of horses by other than the owner or occupant of the property and their non-paying guests. Included in this definition are riding academies.” The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agritourism as “[a]ny activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest -your-own activities, or natural Page 2 of 2 activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity.” Agriculture, commercial stables, and agritourism are permitted by -right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential District. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this petition on April 6, 2026. Two citizens spoke in support of the rezoning request during the public hearing. They stated: that the Ellermans have enhanced the property since purchasing it; there were several concerns by neighbors of a residential development on this site and there are already many subdivisions in the area; supports keeping the property in its natural state; neighbors had a lot of anxiety when the property was for sale and were against a residential development on the property; neighbors are happy with what has been done since the Ellermans purchased the property and are supportive of the rezoning and keeping the property agricultural. The Planning Commission discussed: the properties' rural setting; the historic agricultural uses on the property; the proposed uses by the applicant; community support for the project and rezoning; topography of the site; properties are rated good (Tier 3) in the draft Housing Study; housing needs in the County; surrounding zoning and land uses; and future land use designations. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1 and R-2 to AR. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Old Orchard Farm, LLC Request: Rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District (207 acres), and R-2, Medium Density Residential District (43 acres), to AR, Location: Tax Parcel: 7131 Old Mountain Road, 7015 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, and 0 Williamson Road # 028.03-01-26.00-0000, # 028.03-01-25.00-0000, # 028.03-01-23.00-0000, # 028.03-01- 22.00-0000, # 028.03-01-24.00-0000, # 039.01-01-46.00-0000, and # 028.00-01-07.00- 0000 Proposed Proffered Conditions None Old Orchard Farm, LLC is petitioning to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District (207 acres), and R-2, Medium Density Residential District (43 acres), to AR, Agricultural/Residential District to expand the existing underlying agricultural uses on the property. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the eastern portion of the subject property that directly abuts Read Mountain Preserve, approximately 32% of the property, as Conservation. Conservation is a future land use area of environmental sensitivity due to topography (greater than 33%), existence of unique land characteristics, conservation/open space/greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Conservation future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the center portion and the southwestern portion of the subject, approximately 44% of the property, as Development. Development is a future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Clustered developments are encouraged as is the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Since conventional residential and cluster residential are allowed in AR, the proposed rezoning would be consistent with the Development future land use designation; however, the proposed uses indicated by the applicant would not be consistent with the Development future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the northwestern portion of the subject property along Old Mountain Road, approximately 24% of the property, as Principal Industrial. Principal Industrial is a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial future land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agriculture as “The use of land for the production of food and fiber, including farming, dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry. A garden and residential chicken keeping, accessory to a residence, shall not be considered agriculture.” The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a commercial stable as “The boarding, breeding or raising of horses or ponies not owned by the owner or occupant of the property or riding of horses by other than the owner or occupant of the property and their non-paying guests. Included in this definition are riding academies.” The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agritourism as “Any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest-your-own activities, or natural activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity.” Agriculture, commercial stables, and agritourism are permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential District. All development and use of the property must be in conformance with Section 30-34 (AR development standards) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Section 30-81-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for agriculture (standards attached). Section 30-81-6 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for commercial stables (standards attached). Section 30-81-1.5 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for agritourism (standards attached). If the rezoning was approved, comprehensive site plan and building plan reviews would be required before any construction could take place. In the R-1, Low Density Residential zoning district single-family dwelling, attached, single-family dwelling, attached (cluster subdivision option), single-family dwelling, detached, single-family dwelling, detached (cluster subdivision option), and single-family dwelling, detached (zero lot line option) uses are all permitted. The minimum lot size for a lot with public water and sewer availability is 7,200 square feet with 60 feet of public road frontage. In the AR, Agricultural/Residential zoning district, single family dwelling, detached and single-family dwelling, attached (cluster subdivision option) are permitted uses including all of the same single-family dwelling, detached options that are permitted in R-1. In AR, the minimum lot size for a lot with public water and sewer availability is 25,000 square feet with 90 feet of public road frontage. Depending on the amount of open space conserved (25% to 45%), the allowable density for cluster subdivisions ranges 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – There are seven (7) parcels involved in this petition totaling approximately 250 acres. The applicant included news articles from 1939 in their application that identify the property as part of an orchard owned by Roanoke Orchard Company that had the third largest commercial crop in Virginia. Prior to being purchased by the current owner, these parcels were owned by the Bradshaw family and used for unoccupied residential structures on the property that were determined not to be structurally sound that have been removed by the current owners of the property. There were also several agricultural related accessory structures that have been removed. The agricultural use of the property has been continued by the current property owners. Since purchasing the property in 2023, the current property owner has constructed three (3) agricultural accessory structures in the northernmost area. Construction has begun of a new single-family dwelling in the northeastern area of the property and a horse barn towards the center of the parcel addressed 7015 Old Mountain Road. The agricultural use of the property has continued since the properties were used as an orchard. Prior to the 1992 comprehensive rezoning, six (6) of the parcels were zoned RE, Residential Estate District and one (1) of the parcels was zoned A-1, Agricultural District. The agricultural use of the parcels has not been discontinued for more than two (2) years; therefore, the agricultural use of the land is permitted to continue as a non-conforming use under Roanoke County Code section 30-23-2 (attached). The proposed rezoning would bring the current use of the property into compliance with the current standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The proposed rezoning would also allow for the expansion into other agricultural uses that the property owner has proposed in their application, including a commercial stable and the potential for agritourism. Road. The northernmost parcel addressed 7015 Old Mountain Road is mostly clear of trees and grassy in its western portion with a group of trees around the primary entrance. The existing entrance is located on the parcel addressed 7131 Old Mountain Road. This parcel is lined with trees on the northern and southern property lines and has scattered trees throughout. The property slopes upward to the east where the single- family dwelling is being constructed. There is approximately a 160-foot elevation change from Old Mountain Road to the single-family dwelling. To the east of the single-family dwelling, the property slopes steeply and is entirely wooded. The elevation change from the single-family dwelling to the eastern property line is approximately 280 feet. The topography on the southern half of the property is extreme. There is approximate a 300-foot elevation change from Old Mountain Road to the eastern property line on the southern portion of the property. The eastern and western portions of this property are primarily wooded with a clearer section in the middle. There are two drainage channels that come down from Read Mountain through the southern portion of the property that are shown on the concept plan. There are cleared pathways that lead around the property, many of which are not traversable in a vehicle. Road. Directly to the north of the subject property is Bellevue Gardens and Bellevue Estates, these subdivisions contain approximately 68 parcels and are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. Beyond Bellevue Gardens is Stonegate, a subdivision that is partially in Roanoke County and partially in Botetourt County. The jurisdictional line that separates Roanoke County and Botetourt County is approximately a quarter of a mile north of the subject property. Directly to the east of the subject property is Read Mountain Preserve. The portion of Read Mountain Preserve directly adjoining the property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District and the remainder of the preserve is zoned AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District. To the south of the subject properties are parcels zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District and R-2, Medium Density Residential District. There are a mix of larger and smaller lots that mostly contain single-family dwellings or are vacant. The jurisdictional line that separates Roanoke County and the City of Roanoke is approximately a quarter of a mile south of the subject property. To the west of the southern portion of the subject property are three (3) neighborhoods, Old Mountain Estates, Cedar Hill, and Burnette Heights. These parcels are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District and R-2, Medium Density Residential District. Community Outreach – Approximately 99 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. This letter also included the date, time, and location for the planned community meeting which was held on Monday, March 16th at the Hollins Library from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Roanoke County Planning staff and the applicant were in attendance. Approximately twenty-nine (29) citizens attended. Three citizen comments were submitted, all in support of the proposed rezoning. 3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture – The submitted concept plan shows the existing primary entrance off of Old Mountain Road and the secondary utility entrance. The existing agricultural structures are shown in the northeastern area of the property. The property owner is creating a garden in this area as well. The single- family dwelling that is currently under construction is shown toward the east of the property and the horse barn that is under construction is shown to the west of the single-family dwelling. The horse barn is permitted for personal use as a private stable under the existing zoning. The property owner is proposing boarding horses that do not belong to them in the barn which would make the horse barn a commercial stable and require the property to be agriculturally zoned, if this rezoning were approved, the AR, Agricultural/Residential zoning designation would allow for the commercial stable use. All active development of the property has been approved by Roanoke County and there is an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan that shows the development of the property. There is a pond directly west of the single-family dwelling. The property owner has indicated they may have a small orchard to the east of the horse barn. There are fenced in areas for the horses to the east and north of the horse barn. There is a powerline that runs through the two easternmost parcels from north to south. Access/Traffic Circulation – There are three (3) existing entrances to the site off of Old Mountain Road. The primary entrance is located on the parcel addressed 7131 Old Mountain Road. This entrance currently serves as a construction entrance and is gated when it is not in use. The applicant has indicated that no changes to this entrance are proposed, therefore, it will be sufficient to accommodate anticipated commercial and agricultural vehicle types including horse trailers and farm equipment. The gravel road that leads from this entrance provides access to the existing agricultural structures, the single-family dwelling, and the horse barn. There is a utility entrance to the south of the primary entrance, this entrance is gated and there are no proposed changes. There is a third access to the site for a utility easement that is not used Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Fire and Rescue – Fire and Rescue does not object to this project, and it will not increase the services we provide. General Services – Do not see any issues and do not have comments. VDOT – We have reviewed the above-mentioned rezoning request. It appears from the information provided that allowing single family and farm use on this property will not adversely impact the VDOT right-of-way. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the parcel or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting. Transportation – 1. Please provide anticipated daily vehicle trips for proposed commercial agricultural uses. 2. Please show how existing and/or proposed entrances to the property from Old Mountain Road will accommodate the anticipated commercial and agricultural vehicle types (for example, trucks towing horse trailers, large farming equipment, etc.). 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the eastern portion of the subject property that directly abuts Read Mountain Preserve, approximately 32% of the property, as Conservation. Conservation is a future land use area of environmental sensitivity due to topography (greater than 33%), existence of unique land characteristics, conservation/open space/greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Conservation future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the center portion and the southwestern portion of the subject, approximately 44% of the property, as Development. Development is a future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Clustered developments are encouraged as is the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Since conventional residential and cluster residential are allowed in AR, the proposed rezoning would be consistent with the Development future land use designation; however, the proposed uses indicated by the applicant would not be consistent with the Development future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the northwestern portion of the subject property along Old Mountain Road, approximately 24% of the property, as Principal Industrial. Principal Industrial is a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Old Orchard Farm, LLC is petitioning to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District (207 acres), and R-2, Medium Density Residential District (43 acres), to AR, Agricultural/Residential District to expand the existing underlying agricultural use. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of approximately 32% of the subject property as Conservation. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Conservation future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of approximately 44% of the subject property as Development. Since conventional residential and cluster residential are allowed in AR, the proposed rezoning would be consistent with the Development future land use designation; however, the proposed uses indicated by the applicant would not be consistent with the Development future land use designation. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of approximately 24% of the subject property as Principal Industrial. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation. CASE NUMBER: #3-4/2026 PREPARED BY: Skylar Camerlinck HEARING DATES: PC: April 6, 2026 BOS: April 28, 2026 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs R-1 District Regulations R-2 District Regulations AR District Regulations Agriculture Use and Design Standards Stable, Commercial Use and Design Standards Agritourism Use and Design Standards Code Section 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land Conservation Future Land Use Designation Development Future Land Use Designation Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation Citizen Comments County of Roanoke Community Develo1,mcnt Planning & Zoning For Starr Use Only P(' BZAdarc 5204 Bernard Drive PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ZOU, Plaards u..,cd ROS Jatc: L/ zg (540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of opphca1ion lil.:d (check all thnt apply) Id Rewning Spcciul Un u V1'riancc Wainr r AdmiDistrativc Ap11cal o Comp Phtn (l�.2 -22JZ) Rc,•il'W Applicants name. address w zip Phone. (540)598-2664 Old Orchard Farm. LLC Cell# (540)596-2664 517 Walnut Ave SE, Roanoke, VA 24014 Lma1l· Conlact for Legal Ads WhllEllefmaa Owner's namc•oddr1 .. ·ss w tip Phone# SAME Ct:11# fma1I: Prop.:rty Location Magist1.-rial DtMrtcl. Hollins 7131 Old Mountain Road. Roanoke, VA 2401 19 Community Plannmg area Holl11s Ta., Maft No.:See a tached list of tax mao numbers Extstmg lomng: R·1/R·2 Size of parccl(s): Acres 240 MOL Ex1�1111g I.and Use: Agricultural REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (l.lJ.11.JJJ REJIIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: AR Proposed Land Use: Agncullural • Horse stables (commercial), gardens, orchards O�s the parcel meet the mmnnum lot area. width, and fronlage requirements of the r«1ucsh:d district? Yes X: No IF NO. A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezonhatt), Does the parcel mccl the nummum l.nlcna for th<.: requ�t«t l 1se Type in Arlicle IV (Sp�ial U� Permit)'? Y1.-s No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are cond11tons bcmg proflcred with this requesl'! YesJ No JI ARIANCE, WA/VER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (JI/WI.AA) Variance/Waiver ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order 10: Appeal of Zoning AdmmtMrator's dect�1on to Appeal l)f lnlcrprctatioo ofSect11)11(s) of the Roonoke County l()lllllg Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation ofZon111g Map 10 Is the applica1io11 compkte? Please check ti enclose d. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. k/S/WICP \'/AA R/S/WICP \'/AA R/Sf\\/C'P \"/AA Consullallon Eli 8 I 2" x 11" concq,1 pion � Applicetiun f.:c Applicahon Metes and bounds dt�nption Prolle1-:o:. if:lwl�ablc Jti.�tilicatroo Wat�'!' and sewer applicauon Adjoining propcny owners I ho:n:byefftify th:11 I am .:11hcr 1ht owner of the ._-..._<>r the own,:r·s agent or conlr.k.1 ptm.:hther ond am acting wi1h the kno\\1.:dgc and co.>n�cnt f 1hc ow1l\.'f 2 2/11/26 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner’s Signature Date Old Orchard Farm, LLC 2/11/26 Old Orchard Farm, LLC Tax Parcel Number Deeded Acreage Estimated Acreage Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 028.03-01-25.00-0000 119.11 122.49 R1 AR 028.03-01-26.00-0000 2.3 1.98 R1 AR 028.00-01-07.00-0000 22.88 22.67 R1 AR 028.03-01-23.00-0000 4.46 5 R1 AR 028.03-01-22.00-0000 56.43 55.59 R1 AR 028.03-01-24.00-0000 2.05 2.07 R1 AR 039.01-01-46.00-0000 42.7 37.86 R2 AR Parcel Areas and Zoning Designations Old Orchard Farm, LLC Rezoning Application Introduction This is an application for the rezoning of seven (7) tax parcels totaling 250 acres more- or-less (collectively, the “Property”) in the Hollins District of Roanoke County from R-1 and R-2 to AR. The change of zoning designation for the Property is consistent with the intent and purpose behind the AR zoning district, fulfills the values of the Hollins Community Planning Area, and reduces the demand on County resources as compared to development of the land consistent with its current designation. Description of Past, Current, and Planned Land Uses In 1939 the Property was owned by the Roanoke Orchard Company. The September 27, 1939 edition of the Roanoke World-News described the land as follows: Somnolent under a hot September sun, the great orchard sprawls over its north- sloping hills. Across the valley, dreamy in the autumnal haze, the Appalachian mountains stand out in blue relief. The scene is one of peace. But it is not one of inactivity. For this is apple picking time in Virginia, as the State’s third largest commercial crop reaches its harvest peak. “Harvesting of Apples, State’s Third Largest Commercial Crop, in Full Swing in this Area,” The Roanoke World-News, September 27, 1939. The article goes on to paint a picture of a vibrant orchard operation, of wagons rolling along farm lanes, moving apples picked by 35 men and women from 5,000 fruit trees to produce between 2,000 and 3,000 bushels of fruit packed per day. Id. Ads from the same paper list apples for sale from the Property as early as 1923, and research shows that the Property held agricultural uses pre-dating the Civil War. Even after the end of the Roanoke Orchard Company’s apple production on the Property, the land has been used for agricultural purposes, including the raising and grazing of cattle by the Andrews and Bradshaw families. We purchased the Property in 2023 with the dream of maintaining this unique bit of land in the way it has been used for generations. In a growing and vibrant urban and suburban community, rural land in such close proximity to an urban center is unusual and special. We care deeply for the heritage of this region, our community, and the Property in particular, and want to ensure its continuation, even if only in this small part. It is our intention to make our home on the Property and to maintain the land in a combination of pasture and forest. Our home is currently under construction, as is a horse barn and pasture, along with hoop houses for year-round vegetable growing. While we could never replicate what once existed with the Roanoke Orchard Company, it is part of our long-term dream to restore at least a small part of the land to apple growing, as a nod to the history of this place. While the current agricultural uses of the land are permissible as pre-existing non- conforming uses, we seek rezoning to allow for the future possibility of certain commercial agricultural uses that would not be permitted under current R-1/-2 zoning. These uses include, but are not limited to commercial stabling of horses (boarding and lessons), fruit and vegetable production and sale, and potential agri-tourism uses or similar events. Rezoning Application Questions and Responses 1. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance characterizes the Agricultural Residential (“AR”) zoning district and sets forth its purpose as follows: These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-34-1(A). The Hollins District of Roanoke County is growing in population and consequently both residential and commercial development. While vibrant residential and commercial centers benefit the community, the County has clearly expressed an intention to maintain certain areas with present and past rural character in that state. Preservation of the Property as rural, agricultural land, and rezoning it to AR to allow for further uses in that tradition, promotes the County’s objective to stay true to its heritage while also supporting future growth and development. 2. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Planning Area Analysis for the Hollins Community Area lists among its “Community Values”: • There are many historic sites in the community that play a key role of providing the links to the past agricultural traditions of the community. • View of Tinker and Read Mountains are important to the residents of the community. Roanoke County Community Plan (2005), Chapter 7: Planning Area Analysis, Hollins Community Planning Area. As currently zoned (R-1 and R-2), the Property could be developed by right into a higher density residential community. While there is undoubtedly need in the Roanoke region for additional housing stock, maintaining the Property as agricultural, and allowing for low- intensity commercial agricultural uses, preserves in small part the rural nature of this part of Roanoke County. It is a stated goal of the County, as set forth in the AR zoning definition to encourage agricultural uses and to “maintain these areas essentially in their rural state.” The Community Plan also sets out the following statement of value and intention behind preserving rural land and promoting agricultural uses thereon: “In a broader sense, the existence of rural areas, working farms, pastoral views, and open space enhance the quality of life of all residents of the Roanoke Valley. Farming is an important and critical link to our agrarian heritage and culture…” Roanoke County Community Plan (2005), Chapter 5: Resource Preservation, Agricultural Resources. The updated Comprehensive Plan – the Roanoke County 200 Plan – carries this vision forward, setting five goals pertinent to this rezoning request: • Protect natural resource amenities, including air and water resources, forests, soils, wildlife habitat, open space, and viewsheds. • Beautify public areas, viewsheds and roadways. • Protect steep slope areas. • Prioritize preservation of historic and cultural resources, including historic buildings and landscapes, archaeological sites, and heritage resources and traditions. • Protect viewsheds and scenic resources from the ridges and from the valleys. Roanoke County 200 Plan, Vision and Goals, Chapter 9.5: Natural and Cultural Resources. The rezoning of the Property to AR ensures its continued use as agricultural land. This is consistent with and helps to fulfill the County’s stated value of maintaining, where possible, its rural character and agricultural heritage. Furthermore, the rezoning fulfills County goals applicable to protecting natural resources and the County’s cultural heritage of agriculture and land protection. As agricultural land with our proposed uses, rather than potential high-density residential development, the Land will offer wildlife, viewshed, and forest protection and beautification, it will stabilize and preserve the steep lower slopes of Read Mountain, all while maintaining the tradition of agriculture that runs deep to the County’s roots. 3. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Regardless of this change of zoning designation, we have no intention of ever developing the Property to the extent allowable under the R-1 or R-2 designations. That being said, rezoning the Property to AR ensures it will remain rural in character, thereby preserving its long history as farmland and also reducing demand on County services compared to what would exist if put to a more intensive use (e.g. residential or commercial development). The farm operations we plan for the Property will rely on well water and private (septic) sewer systems. As such, it will not add any demand on County utility services. Likewise, unlike a residential development, farm roads within the Property will be privately – not publicly – maintained. There is also no reason to anticipate that the rezoning of the Property would cause any increase demand on fire, police, or emergency services. With two new residential communities under development along Old Mountain Road in close proximity to the Property, vehicle traffic along that corridor will increase in the coming years, as will demand upon schools created by additional residential population. The rezoning and planned uses of the Property will not add to this increased demand on roadways or schools in a meaningful way. The substantially lower intensity agricultural use will not require additional vehicle traffic along Old Mountain Road or adjacent thoroughfares, nor will the limited residential use of the land increase local school censuses as would residential development of the Property. Finally, the rezoning will cause no additional demand on County Parks. Instead, by ensuring that Property remains rural and agricultural in character and use, it will be a benefit to the County’s park and conservation land at Read Mountain. By not developing the Property into a higher-density residential community, we will maintain the natural viewsheds to and from Read Mountain, and also preserve and protect forest and pasturelands used as habitat for wildlife in the Read Mountain Preserve area. Conclusion We ask the County to permit a rezoning of the Property from R-1 and R-2 to AR to allow for continued and expanded agricultural uses of the land. Rezoning the Property to AR creates no additional drain on County resources and is consistent with current and planned land use and development in the Old Mountain Road corridor and Hollins Planning Area. The proposed uses are in keeping with the historic land use of the Property and consistent with the purposes of the AR zoning designation and the County’s stated intention to maintain rural land where possible. This land is a “link to the past agricultural traditions of the community,” and we ask that this rezoning be approved in order to preserve and honor that heritage. Old Mountain Road - Aerial Map Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County, Earthstar Geographics 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 TR PI NC DE CN Old Mountain Road - Future Land Use Map Roanoke County Future Land Use Conservation Development Neighborhood Conservation Transition Principal Industrial 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 AG3R2 R1 I2 R1S C2 R1 I1 I1 I2S R1S R3 I1S R2 C1 R1CR2 C2 R2 I1 I2 I1 R1 R1C R1 C2S I1C R1 R1S AG3 R1 R1 R2 I1 I1C I2 R1 I1C R1 I1S AG3S Old Mountain Road - Zoning Map Roanoke County Zoning AG3 C1 C2 I1 I2 R1 R2 R3 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:19,001 (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-41. - R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. - Purpose. The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low-middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses. Stable, Private* Residential Uses. Accessory Apartment* Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit* Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * 3. 4. 5. (B) 1. 2. Single-Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Civic Uses. Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor Commercial Uses. Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Alternative Discharging Sewage System * Civic Uses. Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Halfway House * 3. 4. (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses. Golf Course * Miscellaneous Uses. Outdoor Gatherings * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 011023-4, § 1, 1-10-23; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25) Sec. 30-41-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 20,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. All lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 7,200 square feet. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. 4. (C) 1. a. b. (D) 1. 2. (A) Side yard: Principal structures: 10 feet. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: Principal structures: 25 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: Principal structures: 45 feet. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) SEC. 30-42. - R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-42-1. - Purpose. The purpose of the R-2, medium density district is to establish areas in the county within the urban service area where existing low-middle to middle density residential development (one (1) to six (6) units per acre) is primarily located and land areas which appear generally appropriate for such development. These areas are consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category, and where public services warrant, the development land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. This district is intended to provide reasonable protection to existing single family residential neighborhoods, while accommodating a diversity of alternative housing options. These areas are designated based on access to roads, sewer and water, and schools with suitable capacity to accommodate development at the stated density. Older neighborhoods where smaller platted lot sizes exist are also included where opportunities exist for additional in-fill development. (A) 1. 2. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-42-2. - Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit* Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * Single-Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Two-Family Dwelling * Civic Uses. Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Minor 3. 4. (B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Commercial Uses. Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Miscellaneous Uses. Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small * The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Townhouse * Civic Uses. Adult Care Residences Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Halfway House * Utility Services, Major * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Commercial Uses. Boarding House Golf Course * Miscellaneous Uses. Outdoor Gatherings * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. 4. 5. (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609- 22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11- 12-13; Ord No. 092215-9, § 1, 9-22-15; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 011023-4, § 1, 1-10-23; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25) Sec. 30-42-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 20,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 7,200 square feet. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: Principal structures: 10 feet. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: Principal structures: 25 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. The expansion of a legally established nonconforming structure into the required side or rear yard shall be permitted provided the expansion does not encroach into the required yard any greater than the existing encroachment. (C) 1. a. b. (D) 1. 2. Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: Principal structures: 45 feet. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-34. - AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-1. - Purpose. These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. (Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-34-2. - Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses. Agriculture * Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * Forestry Operations * Stable, Commercial * Stable, Private * Wayside Stand * Residential Uses. Accessory Apartment * 3. 4. 5. Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type II * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Civic Uses. Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Minor Commercial Uses. Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Miscellaneous Uses. Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems * Civic Uses. Camps * Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Safety Services * Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses. Antique Shops * Golf Course Kennel, Commercial * Special Events Facility * Studio, Fine Arts Industrial Uses. Custom Manufacturing * Resource Extraction * Miscellaneous Uses. Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. 4. 5. (C) (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 7, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12- 13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 082818-8, § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 091019-4, § 1, 9-24-20; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 062723-3, § 1, 6-27-23; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25) Sec. 30-34-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system: Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet) Frontage: 110 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 30,000 square feet Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 25,000 square feet Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: Principal structures: 15 feet Accessory structures: 15 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: Principal structures: 25 feet Accessory structures: 10 feet Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 20 feet from any side property line. Maximum height of structures. 1. (D) 1. 2. All structures: 45 feet Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 25 percent of the total lot area. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-81-1. - Agriculture. (A) In the AR and AV districts, the keeping of swine for commercial purposes shall be prohibited. (B) Commercial uses such as gift shops and restaurants associated with viticulture operations shall be allowed only by special use permit. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sec. 30-81-6. - Stable, Commercial. (A) General standards: Minimum lot size: Five (5) acres. Minimum setback for stables and riding arenas: Fifty (50) feet from all property lines. Accessory tack shops not exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet are permitted in conjunction with commercial stables. Commercial stables shall prepare and follow a management plan for responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan shall be approved, when required by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water. Animal waste shall not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining property owners. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 11, 4-26-94) Sec. 30-81-1.5. - Agritourism. (A) Agritourism activities shall be considered by-right uses unless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. If the zoning administrator determines that the agritourism activities will have a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public, a special use permit shall be required. (B) Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by section 13-21(6) of the County Code (noise ordinance). (C) In the I-1 and I-2 zoning districts, the principal use of the property shall be agriculture. (Ord. No. 082818-8, § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 072721-8, § 1, 7-27-21) (A) 1. 2. 3. (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) a. b. c. Sec. 30-23-2. - Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land. Where, at the effective date of this ordinance, or amendment thereto, lawful use exists of buildings, structures or land, individually or in combination, which use is no longer permissible under the terms of this ordinance as enacted or amended, such use may be continued provided: The use is not discontinued for more than two (2) years, or; The use is not converted or replaced, in whole or in part, by a use permitted in the district regulations, or; The buildings or structures containing the nonconforming use are maintained in their then structural condition. No nonconforming use shall be enlarged, intensified or increased, nor intensified to occupy a larger structure or building than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or subsequent amendment of this ordinance, with the exception that an existing, nonconforming, single-family residential structure and use in a commercial or industrial zoning district shall be allowed a 50 percent increase (either one time or cumulative) in the square footage of the use or structure in existence at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any portion of the lot or parcel unoccupied by such use at the time of the adoption or subsequent amendment of this ordinance. No building or structure not conforming to the requirements of this ordinance shall be erected in connection with the nonconforming use of land. Where nonconforming use status applies to a building or structure, removal of the building or structure shall eliminate the nonconforming status of the building or structure or land. Any legally established use which existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, or any subsequent amendments, shall not be considered a nonconforming use where a special use permit is now required for establishment of such use. The use shall be allowed to continue operation, as well as reconstruct or structurally alter the building or structure without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit. However, approval of a special use permit shall be required, in accordance with Section 30-19, when either of the conditions below are present, in the opinion of the zoning administrator. There is a ten (10) percent or greater net increase in the square footage of the use or structure proposed for expansion or enlargement; or The expansion or enlargement will substantially alter the site design and layout as it relates to circulation, parking or other site characteristics so as to adversely affect surrounding properties. This section shall not apply to broadcasting towers and associated antenna allowed by right as set forth in section 30-87-2(B). (G) (H) (1) (2) (3) (I) A manufactured home park legally established prior to June 1, 1986 that is not designated with the R-MH overlay district shall be allowed to continue operation in conformance with the provisions contained in section 30-82-9(L) provided the use as a park has not been discontinued for a period of more than two (2) years. Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six (6) months may be replaced with another manufactured home provided: The replacement home is installed on the lot within two (2) years of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the district setback regulations for principal structures, and; The installation of the replacement home complies with the use and design standards for manufactured homes contained in section 30-82-5(B). If a non-conforming residential or commercial building or structure is damaged or destroyed by a natural disaster or other act of God, such building or structure may be repaired, rebuilt or replaced to eliminate or reduce the non-conforming features to the extent possible without the need to obtain a variance. If such building or structure is damaged greater than fifty (50) percent and cannot be repaired, rebuilt or replaced except to restore it to its original non-conforming condition, then the owner shall have the right to do so. The owner shall apply for a building permit and any work done to repair, rebuild or replace such building or structure shall be in compliance with the Uniform Statewide Building Code and the County's floodplain regulations. Unless such building or structure is repaired, rebuilt or replaced within two (2) years of the date of natural disaster or other act of God, such building or structure shall only be repaired, rebuilt or replaced in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. If the non-conforming building is in an area under federal disaster declaration and it has been damaged or destroyed as of a direct result of conditions that gave rise to the declaration, then the owner shall have an additional two (2) years to repair, rebuild or replace the building or structure. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 1, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 1, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 82394-10, § 1, 8-23-94; Ord. No. 62795-10, § 1, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 111301-11, § 1, 11-13-01; Ord. No. 042208- 16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 101210-4, § 1, 10-12-10; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11) Appendices A future land use area of environmental sensitivity due to topography (greater than 33%), existence of unique land characteristics, conservation/open space/greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. Land Use Types Agricultural Production - Production of crops, plants, vines, trees, livestock, poultry and eggs and associated services such as soil and crop preparation, landscape and horticultural care. Forest and Wood Products - Tree farms, forest nurseries and reforestation services. Parks - Large regional park facilities that are designed and developed to preserve the environmentally sensitive nature of the land. Public Lands - Includes land that is owned by a public entity. Examples include, but are not limited to, Haven’s Wildlife Management Area, Spring Hollow Reservoir, Carvin’s Cove watershed, Appalachian Trail, Blue Ridge Parkway, Forest Service lands and publicly owned land on Green Ridge Mountain. Activities on these sites should be in accordance with their appropriate management plan. Conservation Easements - Includes private lands that are protected by a conservation easement (includes scenic, agricultural, greenway and open space easements) held either by a private land trust or a state agency. Rural Residential - Low density single-family homes in accordance with the underlying zoning. Land Use Determinants Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where unique and important natural, agricultural, historical and cultural resources exist that deserve to have the highest level of protection. Resource Protection - Locations where valuable and irreplaceable resources such as open space, public water supply impoundments, rivers, streams, lakes, productive agricultural land, woodlands, critical slopes, ridgelines, historical and archeological sites and unique natural areas exist. Access - Locations that are accessible by existing improved or unimproved rural roads. Rural Sector - Locations not served by urban services. CONSERVATION Appendices A future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Clustered developments are encouraged as is the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Types Conventional Residential - Single-family developments in conventional lots. Includes attached, detached and zero-lot line housing options. Greenways and bike and pedestrian trails are encouraged. Cluster Residential - Single family developments with similar gross density of conventional subdivisions but individual lot sizes may be reduced to accommodate the clustering of housing while allocating common open space. Includes attached, detached and zero-lot line housing options. Greenways and bike and pedestrian trails are encouraged. Multi-family - Developments of 6-12 units per acre. Clustering is encouraged as are greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. Planned Residential Development - Mixed housing types at a gross density range of 4-8 units per acre. Includes conventional housing, cluster housing, zero lot-line housing, townhouses and garden apartments. Greenways and bike and pedestrian trails are encouraged. Planned Community Development - Planned residential development mixed with office parks, neighborhood shopping centers and supporting retail development. The majority of the development is residential with a maximum limit set on the retail land. Greenways and bike and pedestrian trails are encouraged. Community Activity Centers - Facilities which serve the neighboring residents including parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, parks and recreational facilities and community clubs and meeting areas. These activity centers should be linked to residential areas by greenways, bike and pedestrian trails. Land Use Determinants Public Facilities Capacity - Locations where public facilities are adequate to handle the increased population concentration. This includes schools, parks and recreation facilities and fire and rescue facilities. Utility Availability - Locations where water and sewer services exist or are scheduled to serve the area Environmental Capacity - Locations where natural land features, including topography, provide optimum opportunity for urban residential development. Access - Locations which have or can provide direct access to a major street. Urban Sector - Locations served by urban services. DEVELOPMENT Appendices A future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types Agricultural - Industries which involve the manufacturing, storage, marketing and wholesaling of agricultural products. These industries may also be located outside of the Principal Industrial areas, within the rural designations, where agricultural skills may be found. Small Industries and Custom Manufacturing - These industries typically serve a local market and may involve the on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing. Mining and Extraction - These facilities locate according to the availability of natural resources. Industrial - Conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers, storage yards. Industrial Parks - Large tracts of land that are subdivided, developed and designed according to a unified plan. These parks are employment centers and may include mixed land uses including supporting retail services. These types of industries are encouraged to develop in Principal Industrial areas. Planned industrial parks should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian paths into their designs and link these features to surrounding neighborhoods where appropriate. Land Use Determinants Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where industry has historically developed. Existing Zoning - Locations zoned industrial. Economic Opportunity Areas - Locations identified by Roanoke County as an economic opportunity area. Employment Centers - Locations where labor-intensive industries exist. Topography - Locations that can be developed in an environmentally sensitive manner and that are outside of the designated floodplain. Resource Protection - Locations that can be developed in such a way as not to threaten valuable natural resources. Water And Sewer Service and Supply - Locations where water and sewer service exist or can be provided in the near future. Access - Locations served by an adequate public street system that does not direct traffic through existing residential neighborhoods. Transportation Centers - Locations within close proximity to rail, airport and major street systems. Urban Sector - Locations served by, or in close proximity to urban services. PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution! This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. Report Suspicious ‌ From:Caley Sturgill To:Board of Supervisors; Hollins District Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Public Comment to Encourage Rezoning Date:Monday, April 6, 2026 5:40:14 PM Hi there, Hope your team is well! I’m emailing to submit my support for this rezoning on Old Mountain Road in Roanoke: The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC, to reone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 7015 and 7131 Old Mountain Road, Hollins Magisterial District. I am a nearby neighbor who has had my home for years since childhood, and I very much support this rezoning. Myself and many of our other neighbors encourage the board to allow this rezoning for agricultural use. Thank you! WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution! This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system. Report Suspicious ‌ From:Lori Mulford To:Hollins District Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Farm Re-zoning Date:Monday, April 6, 2026 5:51:57 PM Hello Unfortunately, it turns out that I cannot attend tonight's meeting and I hope it's not too late, but I would like to urge you to support re-zoning the farm on Old Mountain Road for agricultural use. It would be a great benefit to the surrounding area. Thank you Lori Mulford Old Orchard Farm, LLC Rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District (207 acres), and R-2, Medium Density Residential District (43 acres), to AR, Agricultural/Residential District Board of Supervisors Public Hearing April 28, 2026 Location Map2 Project Site •Seven (7) Parcels •7131 Old Mountain Road (TM#028.03-01-26.00-0000) •119.11 Acres zoned R-1 •7015 Old Mountain Road (TM#028.03-01-25.00-0000) •2.3 Acres zoned R-1 •0 Williamson Road (TM# 028.00-01-07.00-0000) •22.88 Acres zoned R-1 •0 Old Mountain Road (TM# 028.03-01-23.00-0000) •4.46 Acres zoned R-1 •0 Old Mountain Road (TM# 028.03-01-22.00-0000) •56.43 Acres zoned R-1 •0 Old Mountain Road (TM# 028.03-01-24.00-0000) •2.05 Acres zoned R-1 •0 Old Mountain Road (TM# 039.01-01-46.00-0000) •42.7 Acres zoned R-2 3 Community Outreach4 •Approximately 99 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. •Community meeting held on Monday, March 16th at the Hollins Library from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. •The applicant and Roanoke County staff were in attendance •Approximately 29 citizens attended •3 comment forms were submitted by citizens, all in support of the proposed rezoning Aerial View5 Topographic Map6 Photographs7 Photographs8 Photographs9 Photographs10 Photographs11 Photographs12 Photographs13 Photographs14 Photographs15 Photographs16 Photographs17 18 Property Background •The applicant included news articles from 1939 in their application that identify the property as part of an orchard owned by Roanoke Orchard Company. •Prior to being purchased by the current owner, these parcels were owned by the Bradshaw family and used for agriculture. •Old Orchard Farm, LLC purchased the property in July of 2023 and has continued the agricultural use of the property. •The agricultural use of the parcels has not been discontinued for more than two (2) years; therefore, the agricultural use of the land is permitted to continue as a non- conforming use under Roanoke County Code section 30-23-2. 19 Property Background •There were previously two residential structures and several agricultural accessory structures that have been removed. •Several agricultural accessory structures have been built. •There is a single-family dwelling and a horse barn that are currently under construction. •The horse barn is permitted for personal use as a private stable under the existing zoning. •The property owner is proposing boarding horses not owned by the owner or occupant of the property in the barn which classifies the horse barn as a commercial stable and requires the property to be agriculturally zoned. 20 Zoning Background •The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agriculture as “The use of land for the production of food and fiber, including farming, dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry. A garden and residential chicken keeping, accessory to a residence, shall not be considered agriculture.” •The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a commercial stable as “The boarding, breeding or raising of horses or ponies not owned by the owner or occupant of the property or riding of horses by other than the owner or occupant of the property and their non-paying guests. Included in this definition are riding academies.” •The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agritourism as “Any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest-your-own activities, or natural activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity.” 21 Zoning Background •Agriculture, commercial stables, and agritourism are permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential District •Section 30-81-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for agriculture •Section 30-81-6 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for commercial stables •Section 30-81-1.5 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides use and design standards for agritourism 22 Concept Plan 23 Concept Plan 24 Concept Plan 25 Concept Elevations Zoning Existing Zoning R-1, Low Density Residential and R-2, Medium Density Residential 26 Surrounding Zoning North – R-1 and Botetourt County South – R-1, R-2, City of Roanoke East – R-1 and AG-3 West – I-1, I-1S, R-1, and R-2 Future Land Use27 Conservation •A future land use area of environmental sensitivity due to topography (greater than 33%), existence of unique land characteristics, conservation/open space/greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. •Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. •The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Conservation future land use designation Future Land Use28 Development •A future land use area where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. •Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Clustered developments are encouraged as is the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails. •The proposed rezoning is partially consistent with the Development future land use designation. Future Land Use29 Principal Industrial •A future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. •Due to limited availability, areas designated as Principal Industrial are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. •The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation Planning Commission Public Hearing – April 6, 2026 30 •Two (2) citizens spoke in support of the rezoning during the public hearing. •They stated: •that the Ellermans have enhanced the property since purchasing it; •there were several concerns by neighbors of a residential development on this site and there are already many subdivisions in the area; •supports keeping the property in its natural state; •neighbors had a lot of anxiety when the property was for sale and were against a residential development on the property; and •neighbors are happy with what has been done since the Ellermans purchased the property and are supportive of the rezoning and keeping the property agricultural. Planning Commission31 •Planning Commission discussed: •the properties' rural setting; •the historic agricultural uses on the property; •the proposed uses by the applicant; •community support for the project and rezoning; •topography of the site; •properties are rated good (Tier 3) in the draft Housing Study; •housing needs in the County; •surrounding zoning and land uses; and •future land use designations. Planning Commission Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to AR, Agricultural / Residential District. 32 Questions? 33 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Rachel W. Lower DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Douglas P. Barber, Jr. Kathryn Thomas SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) District (207 acres) and R-2 (Medium Density Residential) District (43 acres) to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District, in the Hollins Magisterial District MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is partly consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan, and partly inconsistent, 2. Is good zoning practice, and 3. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is not fully consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan and/or good zoning practice, and/or 2. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 250 ACRES FROM R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND R-2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO AR (AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7131 OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD, 7015 OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD, 0 OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD, AND 0 WILLIAMSON ROAD, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBERS: 028.03-01-26.00-0000, 028.03-01-25.00-0000, 028.03-01-23.00-0000, 028.03-01-22.00-0000, 028.03-01-24.00-0000, 039.01-01-46.00-0000, AND 028.00-01- 07.00-0000) WHEREAS, Old Orchard Farm, LLC is requesting to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) District and R-2 (Medium Density Residential) District to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District located at 7131 Old Mountain Road, 7015 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, and 0 Williamson Road (Roanoke County Tax Map Numbers: 028.03-01-26.00-0000, 028.03-01-25.00-0000, 028.03-01-23.00-0000, 028.03-01-22.00-0000, 028.03-01-24.00-0000, 039.01-01-46.00-0000, and 028.00-01- 07.00-0000), in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 24, 2026, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 28, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as requested; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 2 of 2 1. The petition of Old Orchard Farm, LLC to rezone approximately 250 acres from R-1 (Low Density Residential) District and R-2 (Medium Density Residential) District to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District located at 7131 Old Mountain Road, 7015 Old Mountain Road, 0 Old Mountain Road, and 0 Williamson Road (Roanoke County Tax Map Numbers: 028.03 -01-26.00- 0000, 028.03-01-25.00-0000, 028.03-01-23.00-0000, 028.03-01-22.00- 0000, 028.03-01-24.00-0000, 039.01-01-46.00-0000, and 028.00-01- 07.00-0000), in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby approved. 2. The Board finds that the request as submitted is partly consistent with the purpose and intent of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and partly inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Board further finds that approval of the request is good zoning practice and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with a special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3525, 3529, 3499, and 0 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from residential to agricultural. BACKGROUND: This application involves three adjacent parcels. Prior to the comprehensive rezoning in 1992, all three parcels were zoned A-1, Agricultural, District. During the comprehensive rezoning, the subject parcels were rezoned to R-1, Low Density Residential, District. In April 2011 the Board of Supervisors approved a special use permit on all three parcels for a private stable use type with two conditions. The first condition is that no more than one (1) horse or pony shall be permitted for every two (2) acres of pasture area, and the second is that a maximum of eight (8) horses shall be permitted with the private stable. The applicants are petitioning to rezone their properties from R-1S to AR in order to operate agricultural and associated agritourism use types in addition to the existing uses on the property (single family dwelling, short-term rental, private stable). DISCUSSION: Page 2 of 2 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this petition on April 6, 2026. Two citizens spoke during the public hearing. Their concerns included: existing traffic issues on Harborwood Road including visibility, speed and the road being backed up if traffic is re-routed due to accidents on Interstate 81; the marking of any trails so horse riding would not occur on adjoining properties creating liability issues; the one -lane bridge entrance into the property being unsafe for drivers; and frustration on the notification process. The Planning Commission discussed: property improvements; property entrance; parking; notification requirements (letters sent and signs posted on the property); riding trails; comprehensive rezoning in 1992; surrounding agricultural uses and zoning; by - right uses in R-1; traffic generated by agricultural uses versus residential uses; and the future land use designation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning as proposed. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with a special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Scott & Heather Thompson Request: To rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District. Location: Tax Parcels: 3499, 3525, and 3529 Harborwood Road #065.00-01-62.00-0000; 065.00-01-62.02-0000; 065.00-01-63.00-0000 Proposed Proffered Conditions: None Scott & Heather Thompson are petitioning to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3499, 3525, and 3529 Harborwood Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District in order to operate agricultural and associated agritourism use types in addition to the existing uses on the property (single family dwelling, short-term rental, private stable). The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use area of this parcel as Rural Village. Rural Village is a future land use area where limited development activity has historically occurred and where suburban or urban development patterns are discouraged. These rural community and farming areas are generally in between the intense suburban development patterns already established in the County and the designated Conservation and Rural Preserve areas. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Rural Village future land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a single-family dwelling as “a site built or modular building designed for or used exclusively as one (1) dwelling unit for permanent occupancy.” Single family dwellings are permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District. There are no changes proposed to the existing single-family dwelling. A short-term rental is defined as “the provision of a room or space that is suitable or intended for occupancy for dwelling, sleeping, or lodging purposes, for a period of fewer than thirty (30) consecutive days, in exchange for a charge for the occupancy. This use does not include existing uses defined in this ordinance including bed and breakfast, bed and breakfast inn, boarding house, country inn, and hotel/motel/motor lodge.” A short-term rental is a commercial use type which is permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District subject to use and design standards listed in Section 30-85-24.55 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. There are no changes proposed to the existing short-term rental use on the property. Agriculture is defined as “the use of land for the production of food and fiber, including farming, dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry. A garden and residential agricultural and forestry use type permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District subject to use and design standards listed in Section 30-81-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Agritourism is defined as “any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy rural activities, including farming, wineries, ranching, historical, cultural, harvest-your-own activities, or natural activities and attractions. An activity is an agritourism activity whether or not the participant paid to participate in the activity.” Agritourism is an agricultural and forestry use type permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District subject to use and design standards listed in Section 30-81-1.5 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. A stable, commercial, is defined as “the boarding, breeding or raising of horses or ponies not owned by the owner or occupant of the property or riding of horses by other than the owner or occupant of the property and their non-paying guests. Included in this definition are riding academies.” A stable, commercial, is an agricultural and forestry use type which is permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District subject to use and design standards listed in Section 30-81-6 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. A bed and breakfast is defined as “a dwelling in which not more than five (5) bedrooms are provided for overnight guests for compensation, on daily or weekly basis, with or without meals.” A bed and breakfast is a commercial use type which is permitted by-right in the AR, Agricultural/Residential, District subject to use and design standards listed in Section 30-85-8 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. All development and use of the property would be required to conform to Section 30-34-3, AR Site Development Regulations, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Comprehensive site plan and building 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – The subject properties consist of three parcels. Prior to the comprehensive rezoning in 1992, all three parcels were zoned A-1, Agricultural, District. During the comprehensive rezoning, the subject parcels were rezoned to R-1, Low Density Residential, District. The first parcel is addressed 3499 Harborwood Road and contains a farmhouse constructed around 1829 as well as two accessory structures. The second parcel is 0 Harborwood Road (Tax Parcel #065.00-01-63.00-0000) and contains a detached garage. The largest parcel has two addresses: 3525 Harborwood Road (main house) and 3529 Harborwood Road (short-term rental). The home was constructed around 2001 and the short-term rental guest house was constructed in 2022. In April, 2011 the Board of Supervisors approved a special use permit on all three parcels for a private stable use type with two conditions. The first condition is that no more than one (1) horse or pony shall be permitted for every two (2) acres of pasture area, and the second is that a maximum of eight (8) horses shall be permitted with the private stable. elevation from the lowest point at Harborwood Road to the highest point where the existing single-family dwelling is located. The property consists of cleared pasture area for the horses as well as grassy fields; however, a majority of the property is wooded area which covers over twenty-five acres of the property. A stream runs along the property frontage at Harborwood Road which runs into the Roanoke River at Green Hill Park. There is currently no mapped floodplain on the property, but the preliminary updated FEMA maps do show an increase of the 100-year-floodplain on the property immediately along this streambed. Density Residential with one property to the south being zoned AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve. The surrounding neighborhood is almost entirely single-family dwellings with some existing agricultural use types. Community Outreach – Approximately thirty-three (33) letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. At the time of this report, two calls have been received by staff with general questions about the application. One caller expressed concerns related to existing traffic issues on Harborwood Road. 3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture – The submitted concept plan shows the proposed plans for the subject properties. No changes are currently being proposed to the existing entrance, horse pasture, primary dwelling, guest residence, or wooded areas on the property. The proposed changes to the property include creating a vegetable farm, orchard, and replacing the existing farmhouse with a new farmhouse for additional guest accommodations with five bedrooms. goes over the stream running parallel to Harborwood Road. This access road connects to all portions of the subject properties and is approximately fourteen-feet wide. After the bridge, the main drive is paved but branches off to the left and right as smaller gravel access ways. To the left, the gravel drive goes to the detached garage. To the right, another gravel drive goes to the farmhouse, future garden area, and existing accessory structures. The main paved drive goes from the bridge to the top of the hill and the primary dwelling. There is another gravel drive that branches off this road and connects to the guest house / short- term rental to form a loop driveway. The application states that the traffic generated by the rezoning will be minimal and mostly daytime arrivals and departures being anticipated on the weekends. No large scale events are planned, but instead small group farm experiences would be offered for team building or Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Roanoke County Transportation - Please provide anticipated daily vehicle trips for Agritourism and guest lodging activities, including what expected vehicle volumes will be during peak seasons. Fire and Rescue – Fire and Rescue does not object to the project, and it will not increase the provided services. General Services – General Services does not see any issues and has no comments. VDOT – It appears from the information provided that allowing single family and short-term rental use on this property will not adversely impact the VDOT right-of-way. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the parcel or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use area of this parcel as Rural Village. Rural Village is a future land use area where limited development activity has historically occurred and where suburban or urban development patterns are discouraged. These rural community and farming areas are designated Conservation and Rural Preserve areas. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Rural Village future land use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Scott & Heather Thompson are petitioning to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District, located at 3499, 3525, and 3529 Harborwood Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District in order to operate agricultural and agrotourism use types. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use area of this property as CASE NUMBER: #4-4/2026 PREPARED BY: Alyssa Dunbar HEARING DATES: PC: April 6, 2026 BOS: April 28, 2026 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use, Current Flood, Preliminary New Flood) Photographs Ordinance 042611-8 Section 30-81-1, Agriculture Use and Design Standards Section 30-81-1.5, Agritourism Use and Design Standards Section 30-81-6, Stable, Commercial Use and Design Standards Section 30-85-8, Bed and Breakfast Use and Design Standards Section 30-85-24.55, Short-Term Rental Use and Design Standards AR District Regulations Rural Village Future Land Use Designation 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 Harborwood Road Properties Aerial Map Vantor, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 AG3 R1R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 Harborwood Road Properties Zoning Map Roanoke County Zoning AG3 R1 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 RV Harborwood Road Properties FLU Map Roanoke County Future Land Use Rural Village 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.180.04 km 1:4,264 Current Flood Map - Thompson Properties Vantor, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County 3/11/2026, 10:18:29 AM 0 0.04 0.070.02 mi 0 0.06 0.110.03 km 1:2,684 Preliminary New Flood Map - Thompson Properties Vantor, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County Special Flood Hazard Area Change Special Flood Hazard Area Increase 3/11/2026, 11:06:09 AM 0 0.04 0.070.02 mi 0 0.06 0.110.03 km 1:2,684 1. 2. 3. 4. (A) 1. Sec. 30-81-1. - Agriculture. (A) In the AR and AV districts, the keeping of swine for commercial purposes shall be prohibited. (B) Commercial uses such as gift shops and restaurants associated with viticulture operations shall be allowed only by special use permit. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99) Sec. 30-81-1.5. - Agritourism. (A) Agritourism activities shall be considered by-right uses unless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. If the zoning administrator determines that the agritourism activities will have a substantial impact on the health, safety, or general welfare of the public, a special use permit shall be required. (B) Outdoor amplified music shall be regulated by section 13-21(6) of the County Code (noise ordinance). (C) In the I-1 and I-2 zoning districts, the principal use of the property shall be agriculture. (Ord. No. 082818-8, § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 072721-8, § 1, 7-27-21) Sec. 30-81-6. - Stable, Commercial. (A) General standards: Minimum lot size: Five (5) acres. Minimum setback for stables and riding arenas: Fifty (50) feet from all property lines. Accessory tack shops not exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet are permitted in conjunction with commercial stables. Commercial stables shall prepare and follow a management plan for responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan shall be approved, when required by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water. Animal waste shall not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining property owners. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 11, 4-26-94) Sec. 30-85-8. - Bed and Breakfast. General standards: The owner or owner's family shall reside on the same parcel occupied by the bed and breakfast establishment. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. (B) 1. 2. (A) 1. a. b. c. No more than five (5) guest sleeping rooms shall be utilized for a bed and breakfast establishment. The maximum number of guest occupants shall not exceed sixteen (16) guests. Any building erected, enlarged or modified to accommodate a bed and breakfast shall maintain the appearance of a single family residence. No rooms shall have direct entrance or exit to the outside of the building, except that emergency exits when required by the fire marshal may be provided for emergency purposes only. Guests may stay no more than thirty (30) consecutive nights in any one (1) calendar year. The operator of the bed and breakfast shall maintain a log of all guests, including their name, address, license plate number, and length of stay, and shall make the log available to county staff upon request. Meals shall be provided only to overnight guests and no cooking shall be permitted in guest rooms. Required parking areas for guests and employees shall be provided on-site. Health department approval for sewage disposal, water supply and kitchen facilities shall be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance. The site shall front directly on and have direct access to a publicly owned and maintained street. In the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts, the following additional standards shall apply: One (1) guest sleeping room or accommodation shall be allowed as a by-right use provided the maximum number of guest occupants shall not exceed four (4) guests. For two (2) or more guest sleeping rooms, a special use permit shall be required on lots less than five (5) acres. Lots that are five (5) acres or greater in size, a bed and breakfast shall be considered a by-right use. (Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 092215-9, § 1, 9-22-15) Sec. 30-85-24.55. - Short-Term Rental. General standards: The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit prior to the occupation of a room or dwelling for short-term rental. The zoning permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: All relevant parcel information including tax map number, zoning district, address, and magisterial district. The applicant's name, address, and personal contact information. 2. 3. 4. (B) 1. The name, address, and personal contact information of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints, if different from the applicant. The county shall be notified within thirty (30) days of any change in the applicant's address or personal contact information, or any change in the name, address or personal contact information of the authorized party responsible for resolving complaints. A short-term rental zoning permit expires upon any change in ownership of the property. A short-term rental zoning permit may be revoked by the zoning administrator due to the failure of the applicant to comply with all applicable regulations set forth in this section or elsewhere in the zoning ordinance or County Code. In the R-1 and R-2 zoning district, the following standard shall apply: A special use permit shall be required on lots less than five (5) acres. Lots that are five (5) acres or greater in size, a short-term rental shall be considered a use permitted by right. (Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21) (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-34. - AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-34-1. - Purpose. These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. (Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-34-2. - Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses. Agriculture * Agritourism * Farm Brewery * Farm Distillery * Farm Winery * Forestry Operations * Stable, Commercial * Stable, Private * Wayside Stand * Residential Uses. Accessory Apartment * 3. 4. 5. Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type II * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) * Single-Family Dwelling, Detached Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) * Civic Uses. Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Minor Commercial Uses. Bed and Breakfast * Short-Term Rental * Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Miscellaneous Uses. Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 * (B) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems * Civic Uses. Camps * Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Safety Services * Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses. Antique Shops * Golf Course Kennel, Commercial * Special Events Facility * Studio, Fine Arts Industrial Uses. Custom Manufacturing * Resource Extraction * Miscellaneous Uses. Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 * (A) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. (B) 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 3. a. b. 4. 5. (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 7, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12- 13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 082818-8, § 1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 091019-4, § 1, 9-24-20; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 062723-3, § 1, 6-27-23; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25) Sec. 30-34-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. Minimum lot requirements Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system: Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet) Frontage: 110 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water: Area: 30,000 square feet Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by both public sewer and water: Area: 25,000 square feet Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: Principal structures: 15 feet Accessory structures: 15 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line. Rear yard: Principal structures: 25 feet Accessory structures: 10 feet Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 20 feet from any side property line. (C) 1. (D) 1. 2. Maximum height of structures. All structures: 45 feet Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 25 percent of the total lot area. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Appendices A future land use area where limited development activity has historically occurred and where suburban or urban development patterns are discouraged. These rural community and farming areas are generally in between the intense suburban development patterns already established in the County and the designated Conservation and Rural Preserve areas. Land Use Types Rural Housing - Low-density single-family residential generally averaging one unit per acre. Cluster developments are encouraged. Rural Community Centers - Nonresidential uses which serve rural residents such as outdoor recreation and park facilities, religious facilities, schools, fire and rescue stations and clubs. Agricultural Production and Services - Livestock, orchards and crop productions, landscape and horticultural services, veterinary services, farm labor and farm management services. Generally including all activities that support land-based uses. Forest and Wood Products - Includes the operation of timber tracts, tree farms, forest nurseries and the gathering of forest products. Excludes sawmills and large-scale timber cutting operations. Small Scale Commercial - Limited commercial operations that serve the local, rural community. Included would be personal services and retail convenience stores. Rural Parks and Outdoor Recreation - Parks and recreational facilities that are designed to preserve the environmentally sensitive character of the rural landscape. Land Use Determinants Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where very low density residential, institutional and limited agricultural uses have developed. Existing Zoning - Locations where rural residential and agricultural zoning have been established. Rural Residential Expansion Areas - Locations where small scale, very low density rural residential housing is desirable. Agricultural - Locations where existing agricultural uses and activities are present. Access - Locations served by an existing improved rural road and, to a lesser extent, rural arterial highways. Rural Sector - Locations outside the urban service area. RURAL VILLAGE Scott & Heather Thompson Rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District Board of Supervisors Public Hearing April 28, 2026 Location Map2 Project Site •3525, 3529, 3499 Harborwood Road •44.33 Acres •Request to rezone from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural/Residential District •Existing SUP issued in April 2011 for a Private Stable 3 Flood Maps4 Current FEMA Flood Data Map: No Flood Zones FEMA Preliminary Map Changes: 100 Year Floodplain (yellow) Photographs5 Photographs6 Photographs7 Photographs8 Photographs9 Photographs10 Photographs11 Photographs12 Photographs13 Photographs14 15 Property Background •Farmhouse was constructed on 3499 Harborwood Road parcel around 1829 •All 3 parcels were zoned A-1, Agricultural, prior to the comprehensive rezoning in 1992. Properties were rezoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, during this comprehensive rezoning. •Primary dwelling on 3525 Harborwood Road was constructed around 2001 •SUP for a stable, private, was issued in 2011 with conditions •Short-term rental guest home constructed in 2022 16 Zoning Background •Proposed uses (existing): •Single-Family Dwelling, Detached, permitted by-right in the AR District. No proposed changes to this use •Short-Term Rental, permitted by –right subject to use and design standards in the AR District. No proposed changes to this use •Proposed Uses (new): •Agriculture, permitted by-right subject to use and design standards in the AR District. •Agritourism, permitted by-right subject to use and design standards in the AR District. •Bed and Breakfast, permitted by-right subject to use and design standards in the AR District. •Stable, Commercial, permitted by-right subject to use and design standards in the AR District. 17 Concept Plan 18 Concept Elevations Zoning Existing Zoning R-1S- Low Density Residential District with Special Use 19 Surrounding Zoning North- R-1 South- R-1, AG-3 East- R-1 West- R1 Future Land Use20 Rural Village •A future land use area where limited development activity has historically occurred and where suburban or urban development patterns are discouraged. •These rural community and farming areas are generally in between the intense suburban development patterns already established in the County and the designated Conservation and Rural Preserve areas. •The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Rural Village future land use designation Planning Commission Public Hearing – April 6, 2026 21 •Two (2) citizens spoke in opposition to the request during the public hearing. •The concerns/issues raised included: •existing traffic issues on Harborwood Road including visibility, speed and the road being backed up if traffic is re-routed due to accidents on Interstate 81; •the marking of any trails so horses would not be ridden on adjoining properties creating liability issues; •the one-lane bridge entrance into the property being unsafe for drivers; and •frustration on the notification process. Planning Commission22 •Planning Commission discussed: •property improvements; •property entrance; parking; •notification requirements (letters sent and signs posted on the property); •riding trails; •comprehensive rezoning in 1992; •surrounding agricultural uses and zoning; •by-right uses in R-1; •traffic generated by agricultural uses versus residential uses; and •the future land use designation. Planning Commission Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1S, Low Density Residential District with special use permit, to AR, Agricultural / Residential District. 23 Questions? 24 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Rachel W. Lower DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Douglas P. Barber, Jr. Kathryn Thomas SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of Scott & Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R - 1S (Low Density Residential) District with a special use permit to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District, in the Catawba Magisterial District MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan, and 2. Is good zoning practice, and 3. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed rezoning request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan, and/or 2. Is not good zoning practice, and/or 3. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 44.33 ACRES FROM R-1S (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT WITH A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AR (AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 3499, 3525, 3529 , and 0 HARBORWOOD ROAD, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBERS: 065.00-01-62.00-0000, 065.00-01-62.02-0000, AND 065.00-01- 63.00-0000) WHEREAS, Scott and Heather Thompson are requesting to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S (Low Density Residential) District with a special use permit to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District located at 3499, 3525, 3529 , and 0 Harborwood Road (Roanoke County Tax Map Numbers 065.00-01-62.00-0000, 065.00-01-62.02-0000, and 065.00-01-63.00-0000), in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 24, 2026, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 28, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as requested; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The petition of Scott and Heather Thompson to rezone approximately 44.33 acres from R-1S (Low Density Residential) District with a special use permit to AR (Agricultural/Residential) District located at 3499, 3525, 3529, and 0 Harborwood Road (Roanoke County Tax Map Numbers 065.00-01-62.00- Page 2 of 2 0000, 065.00-01-62.02-0000, and 065.00-01-63.00-0000), in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby approved. 2. The Board finds that the request as submitted is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Board further finds that approval of the request is good zoning practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 28, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Tina Arcuri to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and a special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood County Administrator ISSUE: Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage. BACKGROUND: In 2021, Secure Storage, LLC filed a petition to remove four (4) proffered conditions affecting this property, and to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. Through adoption of Ordinance #062221-8, the Board of Supervisors approved the removal of four (4) proffered conditions and the request for a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. The approved special use permit included five (5) conditions, one of which requires that, “freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width and shall be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021”. After the mini-warehouse facility was constructed in August 2025, the facility changed ownership in November 2025. The applicant, on behalf of the new owner, is proposing to replace the existing freestanding sign with a new freestanding sign that is not in Page 2 of 2 conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021. Therefore, the applicant is petitioning to amend the special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this petition on April 6, 2026. No citizens spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed the project, the special use permit condition regarding signage, and that no public comments have been received on this application. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the special use permit amending the condition regarding freestanding signage as follows: . Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an ordinance to amend a special use permit for freestanding signage as follows: . Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) Request: Amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District Location: Tax Parcels: 917 North Electric Road #036.19-01-41.01-0000 Suggested Amended Condition: Note: d. Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. All other special use permit conditions would remain in place. Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) is petitioning to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. Amendment of this condition would allow for the existing mini-warehouse facility’s freestanding sign to be replaced with a new freestanding sign advertising the new facility owner. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of this area as Core. Core areas are where high-intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. The petition to amend the special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage for the existing mini-warehouse facility would not affect the use of the property and is consistent with the Core future land use designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In 2021, Secure Storage, LLC filed a petition to remove four (4) proffered conditions affecting this property, and to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. Through adoption of Ordinance #062221-8, the Board of Supervisors approved the removal of four (4) proffered conditions and the request for a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. The approved special use permit included five (5) conditions, one of which requires that, “freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021”. After the mini-warehouse facility was constructed in August 2025, the facility changed ownership in November 2025. The applicant, on behalf of the new owner, is proposing to replace the existing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021. Therefore, the applicant is petitioning to amend the special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background – In 1984, the subject property (previously three (3) parcels prior to a 2022 small plat application combining the parcels into one) and the parcel to the north underwent a rezoning from R-1, Residential District, to B-2C, Business District with conditions for the purpose of constructing a “new car dealership” (see attached Ordinance #1283-46 for additional information). A new car dealership was constructed on the parcel to the north, with the subject property remaining vacant. In 1998, the middle portion of the subject property (previously a separate parcel) was rezoned from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial District, to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, for the purpose of constructing ARK Medical Center. The proffered conditions in this rezoning related to the building design, landscaping, lighting, and signage (see Ordinance #081898-10 for additional information). ARK Medical Center was never constructed. In 2002, the middle and southern portion of the subject property (previously two separate parcels) were rezoned to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, for the purpose of constructing the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant. The approval of this rezoning proffered conditions related to the general building design, access, landscaping, lighting and signage, and effectively revoked all previously proffered conditions (see Ordinance #082702-11 for additional information). The Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant was never constructed. In 2021, Secure Store, LLC petitioned to rezone the subject property (previously three separate parcels) to remove proffered conditions associated with the 1984 and 2002 rezonings and to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. Both the request to rezone the subject property and obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility were approved (see Ordinance #062221-8 for additional information). Through approval of the rezoning, the 1984 proffered condition requiring that the northern portion of the subject property be used only as a “new car dealership” was removed, and three (3) of the 2002 proffered conditions affecting the middle and southern portion of the subject property specific to construction of the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant were removed. The subsequent approval of the special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility imposed the following five (5) conditions on the subject property. a. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled “Concept Plan’ prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc., dated May 26, 2021, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. b. Landscaping on site shall be installed in general conformance to the concept plan titled “Concept Plan” prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc., dated May 26, 2021, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. c. Lighting on site shall be limited to lighting fixtures on the proposed buildings. There shall be no freestanding light poles on site. d. Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021. e. The building shall be constructed in general conformance with the architectural rendering submitted by the applicant dated June 10, 2021. In 2022, a small plat application was made to combine the subject property (previously three parcels) and a recordation of this plat established the current 10.54 acres of the subject property. In 2023, Secure Store Salem, LLC, bought the subject property and applied for permits for the construction of a mini-warehouse facility and installation of signage. The construction of the mini-warehouse facility and installation of signage were completed by August 2025. In November 2025, PS Southeast One, LLC, bought the subject property with the intent to replace the existing freestanding sign with a new sign reflecting the new facility owner. Considering condition ‘d’ of the special use permit approved for the mini-warehouse facility requires that freestanding signage shall be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021, amendment of this special use permit condition is required prior to replacing the freestanding sign. portion of the property at an elevation of approximately 1,210 feet, and the southernmost portion of the property at an elevation of approximately 1,136 feet. To the west, the landscape slopes sharply upward approximately 30 feet to the top of a berm and then slopes back down approximately 8 feet to North Electric Road, partially shielding the facility from the roadway. To the east, the landscape slopes downward between the facility and residential neighborhoods. The vegetation between the facility and property lines is primarily maintained grass and a mix of landscaping, including trees and shrubs. Some of the previously established deciduous vegetation has been maintained on the eastern and southern property edges. Salem located directly across North Electric Road and less than a quarter mile to the south. The property to the North is zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, and is the location of Pinkerton Chevrolet car dealership. To the east, parcels are primarily zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, and are developed with single-family dwellings, with one 6.14 acre parcel zoned R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, that is vacant. The parcel to the south is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, and is developed with a church. Parcels to the west across North Electric Road located in the City of Salem and primarily zoned BCD, Business Commerce District, with a few parcels zoned RSD, Residential Single Family District. The BCD zoned parcels are vacant except for the Department of Environmental Quality building. The RSD parcels contain single-family dwellings. Community Outreach – Approximately twenty (20) letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. No comments have been received to date. 3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture – The site has an existing mini-warehouse facility with four (4) separate buildings and gated security fencing enclosing the entire facility. The existing freestanding sign is located on the west side of the property on the elevated berm between the facility and North Electric Road. The concept plans show that the proposed freestanding sign will replace the existing sign in its exact location. The proposed sign will be slightly smaller in size at 9’-3” in height rather than 12” in height, with the face designed to read ‘Public Storage’ in white text over an orange background, and with directional information and the site address on the base of the sign below this text. Pinkerton Chevrolet car dealership to the north and the subject property. The entirety of this access easement is asphalted until it reaches the entrance to the mini-warehouse facility. At this point, the drive buildings until reaching a circular turnaround point at the southern end of the facility. Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application: Office of Building Safety: All construction will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Fire and Rescue: Fire and Rescue does not object to the installation of new signage. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of this area as Core. Core areas are where high-intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. The petition to amend the special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage for the existing mini-warehouse facility would not affect the use of the property and is consistent with the Core future land use designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) is petitioning to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designations of this area as Core. The petition to amend the special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage for the existing mini-warehouse facility would not affect the use of this property and is consistent with the Core future land use designation. A Sign Permit will be required prior to installation of the new freestanding sign, at which point the proposed sign will be reviewed for compliance with the special use permit conditions affecting this property. CASE NUMBER: #5-4/2026 PREPARED BY: Sarah Gilmore HEARING DATES: PC: April 6, 2026 BOS: April 28, 2026 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use) Photographs Ordinance #1283-46 Ordinance #081898-10 Ordinance #082702-11 Ordinance #062221-8 C-2 Regulations Sign Regulations Core Future Land Use Designation 5-4/2026 3 Applicant Tina Arcuri The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS See Attached See Attached See Attached 6 ALL APPLICANTS a.Applicant name and name of development b.Date, scale and north arrow c.Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d.Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e.Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f.The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g.All property lines and easements h.All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i.Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j.Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k.Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site l.Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m.Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n.Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o.Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p.Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q.If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or impos ed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2 -2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: 2/13/26 7 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash Retail shop/Shopping center Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) Regional public facilities Educational/Recreational facilities Religious assemblies Hotel/Motel Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory Day care center Bank Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly When required to evaluate access issues Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) Substantial departure from the Community Plan Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Name of Petition Petitioner’s Signature Date Tina Arcuri 2/13/26 Project Description Public Storage is a new tenant at 917 North Electric Road in Roanoke County, Virginia. The applicant is requesting approval for installation of new exterior signage identifying the facility. The proposed sign is consistent with Public Storage’s nationally recognized branding standards and is designed to provide clear, professional identification of the business while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding commercial corridor. Importantly, the proposed Public Storage sign is significantly smaller than the existing SecurStor Self Storage sign previously located on the property. The new signage represents a reduction in overall sign area and visual scale compared to the former tenant’s signage. As such, the request results in a visual improvement and reduced signage impact along the Electric Road corridor. The property is located along Electric Road (Route 419), a major arterial corridor characterized by commercial development, retail establishments, service businesses, and institutional uses. The requested signage will be installed on an existing commercial site and will not involve expansion of the building footprint or any change in land use. 1.How the Request Furthers the Purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the Applicable Zoning District The intent of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community by regulating land use in a manner that: •Encourages orderly development •Protects property values •Enhances visual quality •Promotes economic vitality •Ensures compatibility among land uses The proposed sign directly furthers these purposes in the following ways: A. Orderly and Coordinated Commercial Development Electric Road is a well-established commercial corridor where signage is expected and necessary for business identification. The proposed Public Storage sign: •Provides clear identification of a lawful commercial use. •Maintains consistency with the commercial character of the corridor. •Contributes to an organized and professional streetscape. •Reduces overall sign mass compared to the previous SecurStor signage. By replacing a larger existing sign with a smaller, professionally designed sign, the applicant supports the Ordinance’s goal of structured and harmonious development. B. Protection of Public Safety The proposed signage will: •Improve wayfinding and reduce driver confusion. •Allow motorists to safely identify the business from appropriate distances. •Reduce sudden lane changes or abrupt stops caused by unclear identification. Clear identification of commercial entrances along an arterial roadway enhances traffic safety. The reduced sign size further minimizes visual clutter while maintaining adequate visibility. C. Protection of Property Values and Visual Quality Because the new sign is significantly smaller than the previous SecurStor sign, it: •Reduces visual intensity along the corridor. •Improves proportionality relative to the building façade. •Contributes to a cleaner and more refined streetscape appearance. This reduction in sign area demonstrates sensitivity to corridor aesthetics and reinforces the Ordinance’s intent to enhance visual quality while allowing effective business identification. D. Consistency with the Purpose of the Applicable Zoning District The commercial zoning classification along Electric Road is intended to: •Provide areas for retail and service establishments. •Accommodate businesses serving the community. •Maintain attractive and functional commercial corridors. •Ensure compatibility with surrounding development. The proposed signage supports these purposes by: •Identifying a permitted commercial use. •Enhancing the operational viability of the site. •Maintaining appropriate scale and compatibility. •Reducing overall signage impact compared to the prior tenant. The request does not increase intensity or alter district character; rather, it represents a visual improvement over previous conditions. 2. Conformance with the Roanoke County Community Plan The Roanoke County Community Plan emphasizes: •Managed growth and reinvestment in existing commercial corridors •Enhancement of arterial corridor aesthetics •Economic development and business retention •Safe and efficient transportation networks A. Reinforcement of Established Commercial Corridors Electric Road (Route 419) is a primary commercial corridor within the County. The Community Plan encourages reinvestment and upgrades within established areas. The proposed signage: •Represents reinvestment by a new national tenant. •Improves building identity while reducing overall sign size. •Supports continued viability of an existing commercial property. B. Corridor Aesthetics and Visual Character The reduced scale of the proposed sign compared to the previous SecurStor sign directly advances the Community Plan’s emphasis on maintaining attractive commercial corridors. The new sign: •Is professionally manufactured. •Is appropriately scaled to the building and roadway. •Reduces visual mass and clutter along Electric Road. This represents a net visual improvement to the corridor. C. Transportation and Access Management Clear signage supports safe travel along Electric Road by allowing motorists to anticipate site access. The project: •Does not alter access points. •Does not increase traffic generation. •Improves wayfinding without increasing visual distraction. 3. Impacts of the Request A. Impact on the Subject Property The impact on the property is positive: •Enhances tenant identification. •Supports long-term commercial viability. •Reduces signage scale compared to the prior tenant. •Does not increase development footprint or impervious area. B. Impact on Adjoining Properties The adjoining properties consist primarily of commercial uses. The proposed sign: •Is compatible with surrounding commercial signage. •Is smaller than the previous sign on-site. •Will not obstruct views, light, or air. •Will not create glare or nuisance conditions if illuminated in accordance with County standards. Given the reduction in sign area, impacts on adjoining properties are less than those previously experienced under the SecurStor signage. C. Impact on the Surrounding Area The surrounding area is commercial in nature. The proposed signage: •Maintains the commercial character of the corridor. •Reduces overall signage intensity. •Does not increase density or change land use patterns. The request results in a net aesthetic improvement relative to prior conditions. 4.Impacts on Public Services and Facilities Water and Sewer No additional demand is created by the signage. Existing infrastructure remains adequate. Roads and Traffic No increase in traffic beyond the approved commercial use. The signage improves visibility without creating safety concerns. Schools No impact, as the use is non-residential. Parks and Recreation No impact. Fire and Rescue No change in emergency access or service demand. Conclusion The proposed Public Storage signage at 917 North Electric Road: •Furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. •Is consistent with the intent of the applicable commercial zoning district. •Conforms to the Roanoke County Community Plan. •Results in a reduction in overall sign size compared to the previous SecurStor Self Storage signage, thereby improving corridor aesthetics. • Creates no adverse impacts on neighboring properties or public services. For these reasons, approval of the requested signage is respectfully recommended. Budget Signs dba Fastsigns of Salem (VA) Coastal Sign Service 911 N Electric Rd. Salem, VA January 22, 2026 It is the intent and purpose of this color rendering to provide a basic color representation of your sign finish and color. However, digital media and printed colors will vary from actual paint finish and color. Existing painted surfaces will have a perceptible difference in shade and sheen from your sign finish. Providing a sample of the paint you wish to match or a Matthews paint color formula will minimize the differences. © 2025 Image National, Inc. This design is an original work of authorship by Image National, Inc. (image) which owns the copyright protection by the copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code). All rights are reserved by image and, until the use of this design is authorized by image in writing, image owns the exclusive rights to: a) reproduce this design in copies, in graphic form or as a sign; b) prepare derivative works based upon the design; c) distribute copies of the design by sale or other transfer of ownership; and d) display the design publicly. U.S. & P.R. - All signs conform to UL-48/2161 (labeled accordingly) & must comply with UL-41.1 install procedures. Canada - all signs must be CAS compliant. This sign(s) is intended to be installed in accordance with requirements of article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. Site #:File: 16265 Star Rd., Nampa, ID 83687 - toll free: 800.592.8058 - tele: 208.345.4020 imagenational.com PBS-23941-SALEM VA-021826-R623941 911 N. ELECTRIC RD. SALEM, VA 24153 Designer: Account Manager: Date:02/18/26 Page Version:1 RA/MB/AF XX HS Reviewed by: Engineer:XX 2 of 20 SITE MAP SCALE: 1” = 150’-0” SIGN TYPELOCATIONSIGN # DESIGN SIGN STATUS - MAIN ID WALL SIGNS DESIGN SIGN STATUS - FREESTANDING SIGNS ELECTRIC RD.D/F MONUMENT SIGN - NON-ILLUMINATED2 EAST ELEVATION FCO LETTERS - RENTAL OFFICE ON BACKER PANEL3 DESIGN SIGN STATUS - SECONDARY WALL SIGNS / DIRECTIONALS / PANELS WEST ELEVATION CHANNEL LETTERS - ILLUMINATED ON BACKER PANEL1 10 ' - 0 ” P . L . 2 3-4 1 PHOTO SURVEY CHECKLIST FULL WALL ELEVATIONS (STRAIGHT ON) ENSURE ALL PHOTOS ARE: STRAIGHT, HIGH QUALITY & CLEAR. Please include the following: CLOSE UP OF SIGN BAND (STRAIGHT ON) PHOTOS OF ELECTRICAL ACCESS PHOTOS OF WINDOW FOR VINYL (STRAIGHT ON) FULL FREESTANDING SIGNS (STRAIGHT ON) SIDE VIEW FREESTANDING SIGNS INTERIOR PHOTOS OF FREESTANDING SIGN CABINETS EXISTING CONDITION CONCERNS/NOTES: 917 North Electric Road - Aerial Map Vantor, Roanoke County 3/24/2026, 10:36:26 AM 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi 0 0.2 0.40.1 km 1:10,221 City of Salem R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 C1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R3C R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R3C R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C2CS R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 C2CS R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 C2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 I2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 I2 C1 R1 R1 R1 I2 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2S R1 AG1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R2S R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1S R1 R1 R1 R2 R1 R1 917 North Electric Road - Zoning Map ZONING DISTRICTS City of Salem NCCO TR 917 North Electric Road - Future Land Use Map City of Salem JTENSCHLAGER AT LAW 24153 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF IN RE:18.566 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE STATE ROUTE AND ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE SECTIONS 8 AND 9, MONTCLAIR ESTATES, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA ) WHEREAS,your petitioner, Chevrolet, Inc., did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone a tract of land located in the Catawba Magisterial District and containing 18.566 acres(s),more or less, from Residential District to Business District (B2) in order to build and conduct a new car dealership. WHEREAS,after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said request on December 1983 and January 17,1984, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard.; and WHEREAS, after full consideration of said request, the Planning Commission did recommend to the Board of County Supervisors that the request be approved with proffered conditions; and, WHEREAS,after due legal notice, the Board of County Supervisors did hold a public hearing on said request on February 14, 5984 at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleto Avenue,Roanoke,Virginia, at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should be W L A U T E N S C H L A G E RA TT O AN M A T L A WSALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 NOW, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of land,more particularly described below, be rezoned from Residential (Ri) District to Business (B2) District: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.. BE IT FURTHER that a copy of this order be trans- mitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor and upon the foliowing recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Board of Supervisors EDWARD W ATTORNEY AT LAW SALEM. VIRGINIA VIRGINIA: THE BOARD OF OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF ROUTE 419 AND THE NORTHWEST PROFFER OF CONDITIONS SIDE OF SECTIONS 8 AND 9, MONTCLAIR ESTATES, IN THE DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA The petitioner, Chevrolet, Inc., hereby voluntaril proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following condition(s) to the zoning request hereinabove set forth: That the real property which is the subject of the rezoning request be used only as a "new car dealership". CHEVROLET, INC. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1998 ORDINANCE 081898-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.830 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 419 ACROSS FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH LOCKE STREET (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 36.19-1-40) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF NORTH ROANOKE DEVELOPMENT CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.830 acres, as described herein, and located on the east side of Route 419 across from its intersection with Locke Street (Part of Tax Map Number 36.19-1-40) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of North Roanoke Development Corp. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby 1 accepts: 1) The final site plan shall generally conform with the Master Site Development Plan for ARK Medical Center, prepared by Jerome Donald Henschel, dated June 5, 1998. 2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive. 3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36.19-1-36 and 36.19-1-37 shall be Type D, Option 1, buffer yard with a 6 -foot stockade fence plus Type E, buffer yard planting. In all other areas, screening and buffering shall comply with the provisions of the Ordinance. 4) Building height shall be a maximum of 35 feet. 5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit. The poles, including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. 6) Freestanding signs shall be monument style and limited to two. No freestanding sign shall exceed 15 feet above grade. Combined square footage shall not exceed .5 feet for every 1 foot of road frontage. A Sign Allocation Plan shall be submitted for approval in conjunction with site plan review. Lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in -ground units or back lit. 05 7) Building materials and architecture shall be coordinated throughout the entire complex. 8) A minimum of one medium to large 1'/" caliper tree for every ten parking spaces shall be planted. Trees shall be planted within landscaped medians, peninsulas or planter islands designed in a way as to channel traffic, facilitate storm water management, and break up long expanses of parking areas. 9) No off premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly right-of-way of Virginia Route 419; said point being at the southwesterly comer of the property of Pinkerton Properties (Tax Map No. 36.19-1-41); thence N. 71 deg. 03' E. 323.51 feet to a point; thence S. 10 deg. 37' 15" E. 465.73 feet to a point; thence S. 71 deg. 03'W. 386.45 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way of Virginia Route 419; thence proceeding with the easterly right-of-way of Route 419 and with a curved line to the left having a chord bearing and distance of N. 5 deg. 18' 02" W. 474.21 feet, an arc distance of 474.72 feet to the point and place of beginning, and containing 3.830 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson 3 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Ae. (j -AJJ22' Brenda J. Holt , CMC cc: File Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 x 11245 1 13 - Is Job — i ° } 1 1. pt 1.TT Ac N sio let 261 z 25 0 S 40 274 r O's 7 3 Ae f 28 24rp1 t30 33, 4 32-6 34 p3535 .o 14 , •. w so° 3 2 t ,tT3 i 1 moo+ 15 13 t g p ' d 298 3io"° to3° $ So t 3 3 a ' o I f6 jp los3 YZ ° 4 1' t ptl I• i? tp34 11 • q L Q=71`s43t ,, tr, Z51 Ae31 t ptD 4 N • 18p 6 a g $ t 26 • 's 19 9 q, tDj g 25 a tOIi ' f f i 1 gf VQ t'o y IA O 24 is . 20 100! 100 so 23 ,. 21 s R4 t l Off - 42411 t 22 70 Q• 4. 3 SpfD ( j i p9 "'ov, DEPARTMENrI' OF PLANNING NORTH ROANOKE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION t AND ZONING TAX MAP # 36.19-1-40 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2002 ORDINANCE 082702-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 3.9 ACRES FROM C -2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS TO C -2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO REZONE 2.620 ACRES FROM C-1, OFFICE DISTRICT TO C -2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS TO CONSTRUCT A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT, LOCATED ON NORTH ELECTRIC ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 36.19-1-40 AND 36.19-1-38) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF 419 PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 2002, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 27, 2002; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 2002; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.9 acres, as described herein, and located on North Electric Road (Part of Tax Map #36.19-1- 40 ) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C -2C, General Commercial District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C -2C, General Commercial District with AMENDED conditions. That the conditions imposed by Ordinance 081898-10 adopted on August 18, 1998, are hereby removed as follows: 1 DGRald eR Ghel, wed Alfie 5,1—, 998. and 36.19 1 37 shall be Type D, QptlE)R 1, buffeF yaFd with a 6 foot 9 ase. a:_-..._::...:...-.::..,:...:._.e..'- 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.620 acres, as described herein, and located on North Electric Road (Tax Map #36.19-1-38 ) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C -2C, General Commercial District with conditions; and 3. That this action is taken upon the application of 419 Properties, LLC. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1) The site plan shall generally conform to the Master Site Development Plan for the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant Plan presented on August 6, 2002. 2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive and only one access shall be allowed from Route 419 to serve both parcels. 3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36.19-1-36, 36.19-1-37 and 36.19-2-30 shall be Type C, Option 2 (30' Buffer, One 3 large tree for every 30', 6' screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10'). All screening and buffering must be evergreen. 4) Building height shall be a maximum of 45 feet. 5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit and consists of High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lighting. The poles including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. 6) Signage shall follow the Roanoke County Sign Regulations with the exception of Square Footage per Linear Foot of Frontage. Instead of the allowable 1.5 sq. ft. of signage per linear foot of frontage, the applicant shall design for 1.0 sq. ft. of signage per linear foot of frontage and lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in -ground units or back lit. 7) No off -premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. 8) Screening and buffering in that area around where camper and recreational vehicle parking occurs shall be Type C, Option 2 (30' Buffer, One large tree for every 30'. 6' screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10') 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly right-of-way of VA Route 419; said point being at the southwesterly corner of the property of Pinkerton Properties (Tax Map #39.19-1-41); thence N. 69 deg. 42' 12" E. 296.00+/ - feet to a point; thence S. 10 deg. 37' 15" E. 469.00+/- feet to a point; thence S. 26 deg. 38' 57" E. 311.63 feet to a point; thence S. 42 deg. 52' 18" W. 479.87 feet to the easterly right-of-way of VA Route 419; thence proceeding with the northerly right-of-way 103.18 feet of Route 419 and with a curved line to the left having a chord bearing of N. 5 deg. 18'02" W. 2,944.79 feet to the point and place of beginning and containing 3.830 acres for Parcel A (p/o Tax Map #36.19-1-40) and 2.620 acres for Parcel B (Tax Map #36.19-1-38) 4 for a total of 6.450 acres. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance with addition of Condition 8 to provide additional buffering, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Church NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Ljaj\ 1— Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 5 ev sass 8 g, 63 Emeas59 9t 2Y41 29J1.5 2929 —1.4 1.2 1.3 6. 2979 5571 7. 5575 6. ao 5681 .a 2807 24. 3, 27JO 4272a 5— ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants Name: 0. M. Enterprises LLC / DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Rezoning C-2 wingate Inn COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: C-2- Amend conditions Tax Map No. Portion of 36.19-1-38 & 40 Page 1 of 8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2021 ORDINANCE 062221-8 GRANTING THE PETITION OF SECURE STORE, LLC TO REMOVE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON APPROXIMATELY 10.064 ACRES ZONED C-2C (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS), AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MINI-WAREHOUSE FACILITY, LOCATED ADJACENT TO AND SOUTH OF 925 NORTH ELECTRIC ROAD, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NOS: 036.19- 01-41.01-0000; 036.19-01-40.01-0000; AND 036.19-01-38.00-0000) WHEREAS, Secure Store, LLC has filed a petition to remove proffered conditions on approximately 10.064 acres (three separate parcels), and also to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility on the three separate parcels, located adjacent to and south of 925 North Electric Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, “Parcel 1” is made up of approximately 4.00 acres, is identified as Tax Map No: 036.19-01-41.01-0000, and contains the following one (1) condition imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #1283-46 adopted on February 14, 1984: (1) That the real property which is the subject of the rezoning request be used only as a “new car dealership”; and WHEREAS, Secure Store, LLC has petitioned to remove the one (1) existing condition imposed upon Parcel 1 by Ordinance #1283-46 adopted on February 14, 1984, and also to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility on Parcel 1; and WHEREAS, “Parcel 2” is made up of approximately 3.45 acres, is identified as Tax Map No: 036.19-01-40.01-0000, and contains the following eight (8) amended conditions imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, 2002: Page 2 of 8 (1) The site plan shall generally conform to the Master Site Development Plan for the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant Plan presented on August 6, 2002. (2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive and only one access shall be allowed from Route 419 to serve both parcels. (3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36-19-1-36, 36.19-1-37 and 36.19-2-30 shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). All screening and buffering must be evergreen. (4) Building height shall be a maximum of 45 feet. (5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit and consist of high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting. The poles including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. (6) Signage shall follow the Roanoke County sign regulations with the exception of square footage per linear foot of frontage. Instead of the allowable 1.5 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage, the applicant shall design for 1.0 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage and lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in- ground units or back lit. (7) No off-premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. (8) Screening and buffering in that area around where camper and recreational vehicle parking occurs shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). WHEREAS, Secure Store, LLC has petitioned to remove three (3) of the existing conditions imposed upon Parcel 2 by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, 2002 (Condition #1, #5, and #8 above), and also to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility on Parcel 2; and Page 3 of 8 WHEREAS, “Parcel 3” is made up of approximately 2.60 acres, is identified as Tax Map No: 036.19-01-38.00-0000, and contains the following eight (8) conditions imposed upon the parcel by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, 2002: (1) The site plan shall generally conform to the Master Site Development Plan for the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant Plan presented on August 6, 2002. (2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive and only one access shall be allowed from Route 419 to serve both parcels. (3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36-19-1-36, 36.19-1-37 and 36.19-2-30 shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). All screening and buffering must be evergreen. (4) Building height shall be a maximum of 45 feet. (5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit and consist of high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting. The poles including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. (6) Signage shall follow the Roanoke County sign regulations with the exception of square footage per linear foot of frontage. Instead of the allowable 1.5 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage, the applicant shall design for 1.0 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage and lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in- ground units or back lit. (7) No off-premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. (8) Screening and buffering in that area around where camper and recreational vehicle parking occurs shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). WHEREAS, Secure Store, LLC has petitioned to remove three (3) of the existing conditions imposed upon Parcel 3 by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, Page 4 of 8 2002 (Condition #1, #5, and #8 above), and also to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility on Parcel 3; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 25, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning as requested to remove proffered conditions, and approval of the special use permit with five (5) conditions; and WHEREAS, the second reading and public hearing were held on June 22, 2021; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board finds that the proposed rezoning request is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan, is good zoning practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community. 2. The Board further finds that the proposed special use permit meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code, conforms with the standards set forth in article IV - use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. 3. The request to change the zoning classification of Parcel 1 is hereby APPROVED, and the zoning classification of Parcel 1 is hereby changed from C-2C Page 5 of 8 (High Intensity Commercial District with conditions), to C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District), and the following condition imposed by Ordinance #1283-46 adopted on February 14, 1984 is hereby removed as follows: (1) That the real property which is the subject of the rezoning request be used only as a “new car dealership”. 4. The request to change the zoning classification of Parcel 2 is hereby APPROVED, and the zoning classification of Parcel 2 is hereby changed from C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with AMENDED conditions), to C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with SECOND AMENDED conditions), and the following conditions imposed by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, 2002 are hereby removed as follows: (1) The site plan shall generally conform to the Master Site Development Plan for the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant Plan presented on August 6, 2002. (2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive and only one access shall be allowed from Route 419 to serve both parcels. (3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36-19-1-36, 36.19-1-37 and 36.19-2-30 shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). All screening and buffering must be evergreen. (4) Building height shall be a maximum of 45 feet. (5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit and consist of high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting. The poles including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. (6) Signage shall follow the Roanoke County sign regulations with the exception of square footage per linear foot of frontage. Instead of the allowable 1.5 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage, the applicant shall design for 1.0 square foot of signage per linear Page 6 of 8 foot of frontage and lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in- ground units or back lit. (7) No off-premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. (8) Screening and buffering in that area around where camper and recreational vehicle parking occurs shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). 5. The request to change the zoning classification of Parcel 3 is hereby APPROVED, and the zoning classification of Parcel 3 is hereby changed from C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with conditions), to C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with AMENDED conditions), and the following conditions imposed by Ordinance #082702-11 adopted on August 27, 2002 are hereby removed as follows: (1) The site plan shall generally conform to the Master Site Development Plan for the Country Inn & Suites and Family Restaurant Plan presented on August 6, 2002. (2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive and only one access shall be allowed from Route 419 to serve both parcels. (3) Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining Tax Map Nos. 36-19-1-36, 36.19-1-37 and 36.19-2-30 shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). All screening and buffering must be evergreen. (4) Building height shall be a maximum of 45 feet. (5) All parking lot lighting shall be down lit and consist of high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting. The poles including fixtures for the parking lot lighting shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. (6) Signage shall follow the Roanoke County sign regulations with the exception of square footage per linear foot of frontage. Instead of the allowable 1.5 square foot of signage per linear foot of frontage, the applicant shall design for 1.0 square foot of signage per linear Page 7 of 8 foot of frontage and lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in- ground units or back lit. (7) No off-premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. (8) Screening and buffering in that area around where camper and recreational vehicle parking occurs shall be Type C, Option 2 (30’ buffer, one large tree for every 30’, 6’ screening, and 6 shrubs for every 10’). 6. The special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility located on Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and Parcel 3 is hereby APPROVED with the following conditions: a. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan titled “Concept Plan” prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc., dated May 26, 2021, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. b. Landscaping on the site shall be installed in general conformance to the concept plan titled “Concept Plan” prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc., dated May 26, 2021, subject to any changes required during the site plan review process. c. Lighting on site shall be limited to lighting fixtures on the proposed buildings. There shall be no freestanding light poles on site. d. Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021. e. The building shall be constructed in general conformance with the architectural rendering submitted by the applicant dated June 10, 2021. 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. On motion of Supervisor Hooker to adopt the ordinance in accordance with the staff recommendation, seconded by Supervisor Radford and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Mahoney, Hooker, North, Radford NAYS: Supervisor Peters eb'Q@h C. Jack Chief Deputy Clerk to th cc: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Rebecca James, Zoning Administrator Kenneth Fay, Director of Real Estate Rachel Lower, Senior Assistant County Attorney Page 8 of 8 (A) (A) 1. 2. SEC. 30-54. - C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-1. - Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-54-2. - Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses. Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi-Family Dwelling * Two-Family Dwelling * Civic Uses. Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 1/6 3. 4. Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Guidance Services Halfway House * Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor Office Uses. Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office Laboratories Commercial Uses. Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Automobile Dealership * Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast * Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools * 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 2/6 Commercial Indoor Amusement Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Convenience Store * Fuel Center* Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial * Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, Drive-In or Fast Food * Restaurant, General Retail Sales * Short-Term Renal * Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 3/6 5. 6. (B) 1. 2. Industrial Uses. Recycling Centers and Stations * Miscellaneous Uses. Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1* The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Civic Uses. Adult Care Residences Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * Commercial Uses. Adult Business * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Car Wash * Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Home Sales * Mini-Warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service * Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 4/6 3. 4. 1. a. b. 2. a. b. 1. a. Industrial Uses. Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal Miscellaneous Uses. Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2* Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3* (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799- 11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 011023-4, § 1, 1-10-23; Ord. No. 111924-7,§ 1, 11-19-24; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25) Sec. 30-54-3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: Area: 15,000 square feet. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. Front yard: Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 5/6 b. 2. 3. a. b. 4. 1. a. b. 1. 2. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. Side yard: None. Rear yard: Principal structures: 15 feet. Accessory structures: 3 feet. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. Height limitations: Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) 3/24/26, 10:24 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 6/6 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) SEC. 30-93. - Signs Sec. 30-93-1. - Finding, purpose and intent; interpretation. Signs obstruct views, distract motorists, displace alternative uses for land, and pose other problems that legitimately call for regulation. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the size, color, illumination, movement, materials, location, height and condition of all signs placed on private property for exterior observation, thus ensuring the protection of property values, the character of the various neighborhoods, the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community, protection against destruction of or encroachment upon historic areas, and the safety and welfare of pedestrians and wheeled traffic while providing convenience to citizens and encouraging economic development. This ordinance allows adequate communication through signage while encouraging aesthetic quality in the design, location, size and purpose of all signs. This ordinance shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. If any provision of this article is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such finding shall not affect the validity of other provisions of this article which can be given effect without the invalid provision. Signs not expressly permitted as being allowed by right or by special use permit under this ordinance, by specific requirements in another portion of this ordinance, or otherwise expressly allowed by the Board of Supervisors are forbidden. A sign placed on land or on a building for the purpose of identification, protection or directing persons to a use conducted therein shall be deemed to be an integral but accessory and subordinate part of the principal use of land or building. Therefore, the intent of this ordinance is to establish limitations on signs in order to ensure they are appropriate to the land, building or use to which they are appurtenant and are adequate for their intended purpose while balancing the individual and community interests identified in subsection (A) of this section. These regulations are intended to promote signs that are compatible with the use of the property to which they are appurtenant, landscape and architecture of surrounding buildings, are legible and appropriate to the activity to which they pertain, are not distracting to motorists, and are constructed and maintained in a structurally sound and attractive condition. These regulations distinguish between portions of the County designed for primarily vehicular access and portions of the County designed for primarily pedestrian access. These regulations do not regulate every form and instance of visual speech that may be displayed anywhere within the jurisdictional limits of the County. Rather, they are intended to regulate those forms and instances that are most likely to meaningfully affect one or more of the purposes set forth above. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 1/14 (A) 1. 2. 3. (B) (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. a. b. These regulations do not entirely eliminate all of the harms that may be created by the installation and display of signs. Rather, they strike an appropriate balance that preserves ample channels of communication by means of visual display while still reducing and mitigating the extent of the harms caused by signs. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03) Editor's note— Ord. No. 031219-6, adopted March 12, 2019, in effect, repealed § 30-93-1. Former § 30-93-1 pertained to purpose and derived from Ord. No. 092303-8, adopted September 23, 2003. Sec. 30-93-2. - Permitted Signs. Any sign displayed in the county shall be comply with: All provisions of the county zoning ordinance; and, All applicable provisions of the county building code and all amendments thereto; and All state and federal regulations pertaining to the display of signage. If any two (2) or more sections of the above referenced regulations are in conflict, the provision that provides the most restrictive standard shall apply. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-93-3. - Exempted Signs. The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within the county without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service: Signs erected by a governmental body or required by law. Street address signs, not exceeding ten (10) square feet in size. Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-way; are erected or constructed in accordance with the structural and safety requirements of the building code, if applicable; are not located in the sight distance triangle at a road intersection; do not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian travel; and do not obstruct the view of the property street address and street name. Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in sections 30-93-4(A)5. and 7., which shall not be excluded. Temporary signs as follows: Any signs no more than ninety-six (96) square feet, located on property where a building permit is active. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 2/14 c. d. 6. (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. On any property for sale, rent or lease in residential and agricultural zoned districts, one or more signs with a total area up to thirty-two (32) square feet in total size. All other zoning districts shall be limited up to sixty (60) square feet in size. Official notices or advertisements posted or displayed by or under the direction of any public or court officer in the performance of his official or directed duties; provided, that all such signs shall be removed no more than ten (10) days after their purpose has been accomplished. On residential zoned property, one or more, temporary signs with a total area of no more than sixteen (16) square feet, and which are removed within 30 days of being erected. Not more than two (2) minor signs per parcel. Additional minor signs are permitted in certain districts with a permit. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 031219-6, 3-12-19) Sec. 30-93-4. - Prohibited Signs. The following signs are prohibited within the county: Signs simulating, or which are likely to be confused with, a traffic control sign or any other sign displayed by a public authority. Any such sign is subject to immediate removal and disposal by an authorized County official as a nuisance. Any sign that contains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, inflatable or other similar moving devices. Any sign, except an official public notice, which is nailed, tacked, posted, or in any other manner attached to any utility pole, or structure supporting wire, cable, or pipe; or to public property of any description. Any sign located within a public right-of-way, except for signs displayed by a duly constituted governmental authority. Flashing or revolving lights, or beacons intended to direct attention to a location, building or service, or any similar device otherwise displayed that imitates by its design or use, emergency service vehicles or equipment. Any sign or portion thereof that rotates, or otherwise moves through the use of electrical or wind power. This prohibition does not include the changing of messages on electronic message boards. Signs advertising activities or products that are illegal under federal, state, or county law. Any sign that obstructs any building door, window, or other means of egress. Any electrical sign that does not display the UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC label, unless such sign is constructed, installed, and inspected in accordance with section 30-93-9(B). 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 3/14 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Signs or sign structures that are erected on, or extend over, a piece of property without the expressed written permission of the property owner or the owner's agent. Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering a public right-of-way from private property. Portable signs. Roof signs. Any temporary sign(s) displayed on a stationary motor vehicle or trailer when the vehicle or trailer is parked or oriented for the purpose of serving the function of a sign, except when such vehicle or trailer is parked in the operator's driveway or when the vehicle is parked to the side or rear of a commercial building and is not visible from adjacent public roads or is loading or unloading. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 031219-6, 3-12-19) Sec. 30-93-5. - Sign Permits. Except as provided in section 30-93-3, no sign may be erected or displayed in the county without an approved sign permit. Applications for a sign permit may be obtained from the county department of development services. Signs that are not visible from a public right-of-way do not have to conform to the provisions of section 30-93-13, district regulations, and the square footage of such signs shall not be included when calculating allowable signage on a lot. Any owner of a parcel of land upon which a sign is to be displayed, or any authorized agent of such owner may apply for a sign permit. Every application for a sign permit shall include a sketch of the property indicating the lot frontage. The application shall also indicate the square footage of all existing signs on the property, and the area, size, structure, design, location, lighting, and materials for the proposed signs. In addition, the administrator may require that the application contain any other information that is necessary to ensure compliance with, or effectively administer, these regulations. A non-refundable sign permit fee is due and payable with the filing of a sign permit application. More than one (1) sign on one (1) building or group of buildings located on the same parcel of land may be included on one (1) application provided that all such signs be applied for at one (1) time. After the issuance of an approved sign permit, the applicant may install and display any such sign or signs approved. Once installed, the administrator may inspect the sign(s) for conformance with the approved sign permit and this ordinance. If the displayed sign(s), due to size, location, height, 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 4/14 (F) (G) (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. (B) (C) or number do not conform to the information on the approved sign permit, or the applicable standards of this ordinance, the administrator shall notify the applicant in accordance with section 30-21. Any sign permit issued shall be null and void if any sign for which the permit was issued is not installed in accordance with the permit within six (6) months of the date the permit was approved. Maintenance, repair, or restoration of nonconforming signs shall be in accordance with section 30-93-11. If the value of such work exceeds fifty (50) percent of its replacement value, it shall only be authorized after the approval of a sign permit application. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1d., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-93-6. - Measurement of Sign Area and Distances. Sign area shall be calculated as follows: The area of a suspended, attached, or projecting sign, where the letters, numerals, or symbols are on a sign surface which is hung or affixed to a structure, shall be the total area of the hung or affixed surfaces. The area of an attached sign where the sign consists of words, symbols, or numerals painted on or affixed to a wall, fence, or other building element shall be the entire area within a continuous perimeter enclosing the extreme limits of each word, group of words, symbol, numeral, groups of symbols, or groups of numerals, where the symbols or numbers are meant to be read as a unit. The area of a freestanding sign shall be the total area of all surfaces (excluding poles or other support structures) visible from the public right-of-way. For double or multi-faced signs, only the area of surfaces visible at any one (1) time, at any one (1) point on the public right-of-way shall be measured when calculating sign area. The area of monument-type freestanding signs shall be determined by (1) the size of the copy area, (2) visual breaks in the structural components of the sign, and/or (3) variation in the monuments color scheme. The minimum separation between freestanding signs shall be the shortest distance between two (2) signs, measured in a straight line. In situations where these criteria do not provide guidance in determining sign area or minimum separation the administrator shall make the determination. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03) Sec. 30-93-7. - Calculation of Allowable Sign Area on Corner Lots. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 5/14 (A) (B) (C) 1. 2. (A) (A) 1. 2. 3. 4. On corner lots, the front shall be either (a) the side fronting the street providing major access, or (b) the side which the main entrance of the structure faces. In situations where neither of these methods clearly distinguishes the front, the administrator shall make a determination. For commercial or industrial uses, the front shall not be a primarily residential street. On corner lots where a building or buildings face more than one (1) street, sign area shall be allowed for front lineal footage as indicated in the district regulations, and for one-half (½) the side street frontage, provided: The side street does not front on a primarily residential area; Shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) square feet of gross floor area shall be exempt from this regulation. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 072721-8, § 1, 7-27-21) Sec. 30-93-8. - Temporary Signs. Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant to section 30-93-5 and 30-93-15. Temporary signs shall comply with the following standard: Each business or non-residential use on a lot shall be allowed to display one temporary sign at any time during a calendar year. Any temporary sign secured to a temporary fixture or post must meet the minimum sign setback, per Section 30-93-15, from the property line, adjacent to the right-of-way. Each business or non-residential use wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a temporary sign permit. Temporary sign permits shall expire at the end of each calendar year. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 031219-6, 3-12-19) Sec. 30-93-9. - Illuminated Signs. Unless otherwise prohibited, signs may be illuminated either through the use of backlighting or direct lighting provided the following standards are met: Any new or refurbished sign containing electrical components shall be required to have electrical permit approval from the development services office. Information on any illumination proposed as part of a sign must be provided by the applicant on the sign permit application. No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare into or upon any building other than the building to which the sign is related. No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare on to any adjoining piece of property, or any adjoining right-of-way. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 6/14 (B) (A) (B) (C) (A) (B) (C) Any sign containing electrical components shall conform to current UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC standards and display a label from one (1) of these recognized testing labs; or as an alternative, shall be designed and constructed to standards that would allow one (1) of the above referenced labels to be affixed and thereafter inspected by the county to insure compliance with these standards. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21) Sec. 30-93-10. - Projecting and Suspended Signs. No projecting or suspended sign shall extend more than six (6) feet from any wall or other structure to which it is affixed, nor shall any such sign have a setback of less than fifteen (15) feet from the nearest public right-of-way. The bottom edge of any projecting or suspended sign must be at least seven (7) feet above the ground if located above any publicly accessible walkway or driveway. No projecting or suspended sign shall project or suspend over an adjoining lot, without the expressed written consent of the adjoining property owner. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03) Sec. 30-93-11. - Repairs of Nonconforming Signs. Any sign which was lawfully in existence at the time of the effective date of this ordinance which does not conform to the provisions herein, and any sign which is accessory to a nonconforming use, shall be deemed a nonconforming sign and may remain except as qualified in subsection (C), below. No nonconforming sign shall be enlarged, extended, structurally reconstructed, or altered in any manner; except a sign head may be changed so long as the new head is equal to, or reduced in height, sign area, and/or projection, and so long as the sign is not changed from an on-premises sign to an off-premises sign. The addition of lighting or illumination to a nonconforming sign, shall constitute an expansion of a nonconforming structure, and shall not be permitted under these regulations. Off-premises nonconforming signs may remain, provided they are kept in good repair. For purposes of this ordinance, "good repair" of an off-premises sign subject to Chapter 7 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia, means compliance with the "Criteria for Maintenance and Continuance of a Nonconforming Sign," set out in 24VAC30-120-170 of the outdoor advertising sign regulations. Off-premises signs are defined as "outdoor advertising signs" under Chapter 7 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia. Failure of the owner of a nonconforming off premises sign subject to Chapter 7 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia to keep the off-premises sign in "good repair" shall subject the 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 7/14 (D) (E) (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) owner to revocation of the state outdoor advertising permit and the county sign permit for the sign structure. However, the provisions of subparagraph (E) of this section shall control in the event of destruction of, or damage to, an off-premises nonconforming sign. On-premises nonconforming signs may remain, provided they are kept in good repair but shall be removed if the structure or use to which it is accessory is destroyed or demolished to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of the principal structure's value. Whenever a change of zoning occurs by petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's consent, or the owner's agent upon a lot which contains a nonconforming on-premises sign, such sign shall not be permitted without being modified in such a manner as to be in full compliance with these sign regulations. On-premises and off-premises nonconforming signs may remain, provided they are kept in good repair, except that an off-premise or on-premise nonconforming sign which is destroyed or damaged to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of the current replacement cost new of the entire sign or structure shall not be altered, replaced or reinstalled unless it is in conformance with these sign regulations. If the damage or destruction is fifty (50) percent or less of the current replacement cost new of the entire sign or structure, the sign may be restored within ninety (90) days of the damage or destruction, but shall not be enlarged or extended in any manner. For purposes of this section, "current replacement cost new" means the current replacement cost new of similar building materials as were used in construction of the destroyed or damaged sign structure. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03) Sec. 30-93-12. - Damaged or Neglected Signs. The building commissioner of county shall have the authority to order the removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses an immediate and imminent danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. All signs shall be constructed and mounted in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. All signs and components thereof shall be maintained in good repair and in a safe, neat and clean condition. The owner of any advertising sign, other than a permitted off-premises sign, located on commercial property where the use or business has ceased operating shall, within sixty (60) days of the cessation of use or business operation, replace the sign with a blank face until such time as a use or business has resumed operating on the property. Any sign which becomes a safety hazard of which is not kept in a reasonably good state of repair shall be put in a safe and good state of repair within thirty (30) days of a written notice to the owner and permit holder. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 8/14 (F)Any sign which constitutes a nuisance may be abated by the County of Roanoke under the requirements of Virginia Code §§ 15.2-900, 15.2-906, and/or 15.2-1115. (Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 031219-6, 3-12-19) Sec. 30-93-13. - District Regulations. Generally, signage regulations, including allowable square footage, maximum number of signs, minimum setback and height, based on zoning districts, shall comply with the following table Maximum total square footage based on road frontage: District Type Permitted Size (each/total s.f. max) Maximum Sign Area Minimum Setback Maximum Height Location AG-3 and AG- 1 Temporary 1 maximum/32 s.f. 32 s.f.5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 0.25 s.f. per 1 l.f. of lot frontage 5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached AV Temporary 1 maximum/32 s.f. 32 s.f.5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached Permanent 4 maximum/400 s.f. 1 s.f. per 1 l.f. of lot frontage 5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached AR, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-MH Temporary 1 maximum/32 s.f. 32 s.f.5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached Permanent 4 maximum/64 s.f. 0.5 s.f. per 1 l.f. of lot frontage 5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 9/14 (A) 1. C-1, C-2, I-1 and I- 2 Temporary 1 maximum/60 s.f. 60 s.f.5 feet 15 feet Freestanding or Attached Permanent Proposed: 5 maximum/500 s.f. 1.5 s.f. per 1 l.f. of lot frontage **See Options Below: **See Options Below: Freestanding or Attached Options for sign setbacks and height in the C-1, C-2, I-1 and I-2 zoned districts: Option 1 **This option can only be used in the freestanding sign meets the definition of a monument sign, per Section 30-28. Minimum sign setback from front property line: five (5) feet. Maximum sign height: seven (7) feet. Option 2 Minimum sign setback from front property line: ten (10) feet. Maximum sign height: fifteen (15) feet. Option 3 Minimum sign setback from front property line: fifteen (15) feet. Maximum sign height: twenty-five (25) feet. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet of signage. (Ord. No. 052300-14, § 1, 5-23-00; Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 031219-6, 3-12-19) Sec. 30-93-14. - Special Signage Districts and Regulations. Off-premises signs. As of September 23, 2003, a cap shall be placed on the total number of off- premises sign structures in the county, including all conforming or nonconforming off-premises signs, as defined in this section. Consolidation; reconstruction of existing nonconforming sign structures. Existing off-premise sign structures that are nonconforming may be consolidated and reconstructed only in accordance with this section. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 10/14 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. 2. a. b. Applications to consolidate or reconstruct an existing off-premises sign structure shall be made to the department of development services. Applications to consolidate and reconstruct an existing nonconforming off-premises sign structure will be approved if approval of the building permit application will result in a reduction of the number of total off-premises sign structures in the county, thereby reducing the cap on the total number of off-premise sign structures in the county by the number of the nonconforming off-premise sign structures being removed. The applicant for a building permit application may consolidate two (2) single-faced billboard structures into one double-faced structure, which may be a monopole structure. No building permit application for the consolidation and reconstruction of an off-premises sign that is nonconforming will be approved unless it is accompanied by a demolition permit for an existing nonconforming off-premises sign, or combination of nonconforming off-premises signs, of at least equal sign area. No permit for a consolidated and reconstructed off-premises sign that is nonconforming shall be issued until the existing off-premises sign(s), on the above mentioned demolition permit, are removed. The department of planning and the department of development services will review each application submitted under this section to confirm that the square footage of sign area of any consolidated and reconstructed sign structure does not exceed the square footage of the sign area on the sign structure being demolished pursuant to this section, however, the department shall consider the size of the existing sign face on the consolidated and reconstructed sign structure so that the second sign face being added is approximately the same size as the existing sign face on the consolidated and reconstructed sign structure. If the existing sign structure is being converted into a double faced monopole, the sign area of the consolidated and reconstructed sign shall not exceed three hundred seventy-eight (378) square feet, plus ten (10) percent for embellishments, and the height and setback of the sign shall remain the same, or be made more conforming. A permit issued by the county to consolidate and reconstruct a nonconforming off- premise sign structure in accordance with this section shall expire five (5) years from the date of issuance. Conforming Off-Premises Signs. Legally established off-premises signs, located within the C-2, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts, which meet the location and design standards in this section shall be considered conforming off-premises signs. All other off-premises signs shall be considered non- conforming. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 11/14 c. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. d. e. (B) Tri-vision changeable messages shall be allowed on existing and replaced off-premises signs, located within the C-2, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts, which meet the location and design standards in this section. The minimum dwell time that an image must remain visible shall be ten (10) seconds. The maximum twirl time between image changes shall be three (3) seconds. Off-premises signs shall be conforming and be allowed in the C-2, I-1, and I-2 Districts provided the following location and design standards are met: No off-premises sign shall be located within a five hundred-foot radius of an existing off-premises sign, or an off-premises sign for which a valid permit has been obtained, but has not yet been erected. No off-premises sign shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of any residential zoning district, public square, park, school, library, or religious assembly property. No off-premises sign shall be allowed to be installed on any roof structure, nor shall any such sign exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height above the elevation of the nearest edge of the abutting road, from which the sign is visible. Side by side, double and multi-decker off-premises signs shall not be permitted. Any off-premises sign must have a minimum sign setback of forty (40) feet from the centerline of any public right-of-way, or fifteen (15) feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. Any off-premises sign shall have a minimum side and/or rear yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. The maximum size of any off-premises sign on a lot shall be three hundred seventy- eight (378) square feet plus ten (10) percent for embellishments. No application for construction of a conforming off-premises sign will be approved unless it is accompanied by a demolition permit for an existing conforming or nonconforming off-premises sign, or combination of off-premises signs, of at least equal sign area. No permit for a conforming off-premises sign will be issued until the existing off-premises sign(s) on the above-mentioned demolition permit, are removed. Shopping Centers. Within shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) square feet of gross floor area, businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of one hundred (100) square feet of attached signage. Square footage that existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, new or existing businesses may modify or replace their existing attached signs provided the area of the modified or new signage is equal to or less than the original displayed signage. Modifications to freestanding signs shall be in accord with the district regulations. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of section 30-93-13(E)2., within enclosed shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) gross floor area, businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 12/14 (C) (D) (E) (F) 1. 2. 3. a. b. 4. 5. maximum of one hundred (100) square feet of signage, provided the business has a minimum gross floor area of thirty-two thousand (32,000) square feet, and the sign displayed shall be located a minimum of three hundred (300) feet from the closest public right-of-way. Planned Developments. A signage plan shall be submitted as part of any proposal for a planned residential development (PRD), planned commercial development (PCD), or planned technology development (PTD) as authorized elsewhere in this ordinance. The signage plan shall be part of the required preliminary development plan. All signage plans shall be of sufficient detail to allow the commission and board to judge the compatibility of the proposed signage with the character of the proposed PRD, PCD or PTD. At a minimum, all signage plans shall provide information on the general size, location, style, color, and materials of all signs proposed. In evaluating the PRD, PCD or PTD proposal, the commission and board shall consider the appropriateness of the proposed signage plan in relation to the character of the proposed development, and the surrounding area. Airport Overlay District. The allowable height of signs within any established airport overlay district shall be governed by the height restriction for that district, or the height restriction imposed by the applicable district regulation, whichever is more restrictive. Lots without Public Street Frontage. Lots without public street frontage that existed upon the effective date of this ordinance shall be allowed signage based upon the applicable district regulations as provided for in section 30-93-13 of this ordinance. Permitted signage shall be calculated based upon the frontage width of the lot that parallels the nearest public street. Clearbrook village overlay district. Signage within the Clearbrook village overlay district should be planned, designed and installed to complement a buildings architectural style. All signage within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall comply with C-1 office district regulations with the following exceptions: Lots within the Clearbrook village overlay district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one (1) square foot of sign area per one (1) lineal foot of lot frontage. Signage placed on a building wall shall occupy less than five (5) percent of the facade of that wall. All freestanding signs shall be of a monument design and shall meet the following criteria: Monument signs, including their structure, shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height, or ten (10) feet in width. Signs shall be channel lit, ground lit, or top lit with a shielded light source so as not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs. 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 13/14 6. a. b. c. d. (A) A maximum of two (2) directional signs shall be allowed per lot, and no directional sign shall exceed two (2) square feet in size. The following signs shall be prohibited in the Clearbrook village overlay district: Off-premises signs. Temporary signs. Portable signs. Roof signs. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 25, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 72595-9, § 1, 7-25-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1d., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 072721-8, § 1, 7-27-21) Sec. 30-93-15. - Variances. Requests for variances to these sign regulations shall follow the procedures outlined in section 30-24 of the zoning ordinance. The board of zoning appeals, in considering any variance request, shall follow the guidelines of this section, and section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The power to grant variances does not extend to an economic hardship related to the cost, size or location of a new sign, or to the convenience of an applicant, nor should it be extended to the convenience of regional or national businesses which propose to use a standard sign when it does not conform to the provisions of this section. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1a., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 092303-8, § 1, 9-23-03) 3/24/26, 10:22 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances about:blank 14/14 Appendices A future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-density residential developments are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. Land Use Types General Retail Shops, Restaurants and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods. Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like settings are encouraged. Limited Industrial – Low intensity industrial uses that should not have an adverse impact on air or water quality. Multi-Family Residential – Multi-family residential developments up to 24 units per acre. Mixed-Use – Developments that combine retail, service and other commercial uses with office and/or residential uses in the same building or on the same site. Land Use Determinants Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be developed. Existing Zoning - Locations where commercial zoning exists. Access - Locations served by an arterial street system. Population Center - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations. Urban Sector - Locations served by urban services. CORE Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) Amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions and special use permit Board of Supervisors Public Hearing April 28, 2026 Location Map2 Project Site Property Address 917 North Electric Road Site Size 10.54 acres Current Use Mini-warehouse Facility Proposed Project (SUP) Amend SUP condition regarding freestanding signage to replace the existing freestanding signage with new signage reflecting the facility’s new owner. 3 Existing Signage 2021 Secure Store, LLC petitioned to rezone the subject property to remove proffered conditions associated with the 1984 and 2002 rezonings and to obtain a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility. The SUP was approved with 5 conditions (Ordinance # 062221-8), which included freestanding signage being limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet high by 10 feet wide and in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021. Background4 2023 Secure Store Salem, LLC, bought the subject property and applied for permits for the construction of a mini-warehouse facility and installation of signage. The construction of the mini-warehouse facility and installation of signage was completed by August 2025. 2025 PS Southeast One, LLC bought the subject property with the intent to replace the existing freestanding sign with a new sign reflecting the new facility owner. Considering the SUP approved for construction of the mini-warehouse facility required the freestanding sign to be in conformance with the concept drawings provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021, amendment of this SUP condition is required prior to replacing the freestanding sign. Background5 Community Outreach6 Approximately 20 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. No comments were received. Photographs7 Photographs8 9 Existing Freestanding Signage 10 Proposed Freestanding Signage 11 Proposed Freestanding Signage Zoning Existing Zoning C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions and Special Use Permit 12 Surrounding Zoning North – C-2CS South – R-1 East – R-1 and R-3C West – City of Salem Future Land Use13 Core A future land use area where high-intensity urban developments are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. The petition to amend the special use permit regarding freestanding signage for the existing mini-warehouse facility would not affect the use of the property and is consistent with the Core FLU designation. Planning Commission Public Hearing – April 6, 2026 14 •No citizens spoke during the public hearing. •The Planning Commission discussed: •the project; •the special use permit condition regarding signage; and •that no public comments have been received on this application. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit amending the condition regarding freestanding signage as follows: •Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. Questions? 15 ROANOKE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2071 FAX: (540) 772-2089 Peter S. Lubeck COUNTY ATTORNEY Rachel W. Lower DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Douglas P. Barber, Jr. Kathryn Thomas SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAMPLE MOTIONS The petition of Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) to amend a special use permit condition regarding freestanding signage on approximately 10.54 acres of land zoned C - 2CS (High Intensity Commercial) District with conditions and a special use permit, located at 917 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District MOTION TO APPROVE I find that the proposed special use permit amendment request: 1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition to amend the existing special use permit as follows: d. Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021 Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. All other special use permit conditions shall remain in place. MOTION TO DENY I find that the proposed special use permit amendment request: 1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive plan, and/or 2. Is inconsistent with good zoning practice, and/or 3. Will result in substantial detriment to the community. I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800  Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 MOTION TO DELAY ACTION I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 ORDINANCE AMENDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONDITION REGARDING FREESTANDING SIGNAGE ON APPROXIMATELY 10.54 ACRES OF LAND ZONED C-2CS (HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, LOCATED AT 917 NORTH ELECTRIC ROAD, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ordinance 062221-8 adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia on June 22, 2021 approved a special use permit for a mini-warehouse facility located at 917 North Electric Road in the Catawba Magisterial District (Roanoke County Tax Map Number 036.19-01-41.01-0000); and WHEREAS, Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) has petitioned to amend a special use permit condition imposed by Ordinance 062221 -8 regarding freestanding signage on the above referenced property; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 24, 2026, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 28, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as originally requested; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement ha ve been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 2 of 2 1. The Board finds that the special use permit amendment meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Board further finds that the special use permit amendment is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; 3. The Board further finds that the special use permit amendment will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community; 4. The petition of Tina Arcuri (on behalf of Public Storage) to amend a special use permit condition imposed by Ordinance 062221 -8 regarding freestanding signage on property located at 917 North Electric Road in the Catawba Magisterial District (Roanoke County Tax Map Number 036.19 - 01-41.01-0000), is hereby approved, and the condition regarding freestanding signage is amended as follows: d. Freestanding signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign approximately 12 feet in height and 10 feet in width, and shall be in conformance with the concept drawing provided by Blink Signs dated April 13, 2021 Image National Signs dated January 15, 2026. 5. All other special use permit conditions imposed by Ordinance 062221-8 shall remain in place. 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance.