HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/14/2026 - RegularPage 1 of 5
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
July 14, 2026
Disclaimer:
“Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be
the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views
or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or
approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of
the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or
participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively
participate in the business of the Board.”
Page 2 of 5
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
July 14, 2026
the second and fourth Tuesday at 2:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 6:00 p.m. on the fourth
Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are
broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on
Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 5 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online
through Roanoke County’s website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Individuals who require
assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings
should contact the Clerk at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell
1.Roll Call
B.REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
C.PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1.Recognition of Planning Department staff in collaboration with the Public Library, Parks,
Recreation & Tourism Department, Economic Development Department, and General
Services Department staff for receiving a 2026 Virginia Association of Counties (VACo)
A
D.SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.81 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to
Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (Second Reading
2.The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.20 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to
remove proffered conditions from the property located at 5999 Franklin Road, Cave
Spring Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of Planning) (Second Reading
Page 3 of 5
E. APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals)
James R. Ruhland – term to expire July 29, 2030
2. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT)
Haley Poland – Roanoke County School Representative – no expiration
Dr. Elisabeth Harman-Roanoke County School Representative – no expiration
3. Roanoke County Local Finance Board
Laurie Gearheart – term to expire July 27, 2027
4. Roanoke County Planning Commission (By District)
Christopher C. Newton – term to expire June 30, 2029
5. Social Services Advisory Board (At-Large)
Kristie Shanks – term to expire July 3, 2030
Martha B. Hooker – term to expire July 31, 2030
CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE
IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL
1.Approval of Minutes – June 23, 2026
2.Request to accept and allocate $24,610 from the Virginia Department of Criminal
Justice Services, Byrne-Justice Assistance Grant along with a local match of $8,204
3.Ordinance Approving the Second Amended and Restated Intergovernmental
Agreement Regarding the Roanoke Valley Greenway. (Second Reading)
4.Ordinance Repealing the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement
Establishing the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. (Second Reading)
5.Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a Second Antenna Site
Use Agreement and Ground Lease with the New River Valley 911 Authority for use of
6.Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $19,483.82 to the Clerk of the
Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Page 4 of 5
7. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $102,071.84 from the
Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-for-Life" distribution.
8.The petition of Network Towers II, LLC to obtain a special use permit to construct a
wireless communication facility approximately 199 feet in height on approximately 2.62
acres zoned I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 0 Meacham Road and 6155
9.The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 1.36 acres zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to
remove proffered conditions from the property located at 2222 Electric Road, Windsor
Hills Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public
10.Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept
New Pleasant Way in the Catawba Magisterial District into the VDOT Secondary Road
11.Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $41,527.87 from the U.S.
Department of Justice’s Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) along with
a local match of $48,472.11 for a total of $89,999.98 to the Roanoke County Police
12.Ordinance Accepting and Appropriating $328,811 from the Virginia Department of
Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) for use by the Roanoke County Police Department
13.Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $6,431.40 from the U.S.
Department of Justice’s Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) to the
Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office.
14.Resolution Directing the Roanoke County Planning Commission to Study and Provide
Recommendation Regarding Whether to Amend or Repeal the Provisions of Section
30-
15.Request to approve the holiday schedule for calendar year 2027.
G.CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters
of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke
County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is
limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to
speak.
Page 5 of 5
H.REPORTS
1.Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Report
2.Outstanding Debt Report
3.Accounts Paid – June 2026
I.WORK SESSION
1.Work session with the Board regarding the 2026 Sessions of the General A ssembly.
(Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney and Eldon James, Legislative Liaison)
J.CLOSED MEETING
1.Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective
business or industry or the expansion of an ex isting business or industry where no
previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in
locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential
business location or expansion in the five magisterial districts.
EVENING SESSION – 6:00 PM
on approximately 3.64 acres zoned AG-
located at 6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Philip
2. Phil C. North
3. Martha B. Hooker
4. Paul M. Mahoney
2
6
9
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Isaac Henry, Principal Planner
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
6 of 392
1
2026 VACo Achievement Awards Winners
BEST ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
• HENRICO COUNTY
Combating Ageism Amongst Emergency Service Providers | Read
Submission
BEST SMALL COUNTY ACHIEVEMENT (70,000 or less)
• GREENE COUNTY
Employee Cross-Training Program | Read Submission
BEST LARGE COUNTY ACHIEVEMENT
• PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
Crisis Receiving Center Complex | Read Submission
ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS WINNERS
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
AC44 | Read Submission
AMHERST COUNTY
Amherst County Fair | Read Submission
ARLINGTON COUNTY
Internal Coaching Program | Read Submission
BOTETOURT COUNTY
“Hey Google, Is BOCO Getting a Data Center?” | Read Submission
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Internal Audit – Continuous Monitoring | Read Submission
7 of 392
2
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
ZOMod Conversion Map Interactive Viewer | Read Submission
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
ZOMod – Zoning Ordinance Modernization Project and Subdivision Ordinance
Amendment | Read Submission
CLARKE COUNTY
Clarke County – Reengaging, Reconnecting, and Educating | Read Submission
DINWIDDIE COUNTY
Dinwiddie Emerging Leaders Academy (DELA) | Read Submission
FAIRFAX COUNTY
911 Artificial Intelligence | Read Submission
FAIRFAX COUNTY
Community Engagement Framework for Capital Projects | Read Submission
FAIRFAX COUNTY
Completed Projects Book | Read Submission
FAIRFAX COUNTY
Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) | Read Submission
FAIRFAX COUNTY
Project Labor Agreement | Read Submission
FRANKLIN COUNTY
Virginia Cooperative Extension Franklin County Local Food Guide and
Gardening Directory | Read Submission
HANOVER COUNTY
9/11 Day of Service | Read Submission
HANOVER COUNTY
Reducing Barriers, Saving Lives: Hanover County’s Naloxone By Mail Program
| Read Submission
8 of 392
3
HENRICO COUNTY
Arrive Alive | Read Submission
HENRY COUNTY
Coat Drive for Kids | Read Submission
JAMES CITY COUNTY
Advanced Care Paramedic (ACP) | Read Submission
LANCASTER COUNTY
Windmill Point County Maritime Recreation al Campus | Read Submission
LOUDOUN COUNTY
ADC Service Puppy Program – Pawsitive Change: A Correctional Service Puppy
Program Advancing Rehabilitation and Community Impact | Read Submission
LOUDOUN COUNTY
Locational Clearance Review Mapping Tool | Read Submission
LOUDOUN COUNTY
Tag, You’re Home! | Read Submission
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Coordinated Crisis Response: Montgomery County’s Hurricane Helene Boil
Water Advisory Management | Read Submission
ORANGE COUNTY
Elementary School Flag Football Tournament | Read Submission
POWHATAN COUNTY
Powhatan-Goochland Farmers Market | Read Submission
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
PWC311 – Transforming Public Service Delivery | Read Submission
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
PWC Internship Program | Read Submission
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
Prince William County Sheriff’s Office Senior Safe Program | Read Submission
9 of 392
4
PULASKI COUNTY
From Vacancy to Vitality: Pulaski County’s Adaptive Reuse Initiative | Read
Submission
ROANOKE COUNTY
Roanoke County Placemaking Program | Read Submission
STAFFORD COUNTY
Stafford Legacy Program | Read Submission
SURRY COUNTY
From Legacy to Leadership: Transforming Surry County Government Through
ERP Innovation | Read Submission
WYTHE COUNTY
Launching Wythe County Emergency Services: A Regional Funding and Rural
Response Model | Read Submission
WYTHE COUNTY
The Reed Creek Blueway | Read Submission
YORK COUNTY
From Crisis to Code in Four Hours: York County’s AI Recycling Lookup | Read
Submission
103 Submissions
10 of 392
2
5
1
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
11 of 392
2
5
1
development history of the property, the proffered conditions, proffer removal project
process, the benefit of removing outdated proffered conditions for future development
and redevelopment opportunities, property located on a high traffic volume corridor,
future land use designation, surrounding zoning, and implementing the recommendation
in the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
12 of 392
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County
Request: Rezone approximately 0.81 acre of land from C-2C, High Intensity Commercial
District with conditions, to remove proffered conditions
Location:
Tax Parcels:
3306 West Main Street
#055.02-02-14.00-0000
Existing Proffered
Conditions (To be
Removed):
1. Use of property will be limited to the sale of used automobiles.
2. No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles.
3. Development will be in general accord with submitted concept plan, 5-11-87,
including the landscaping.
4. An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed.
5. No billboards will be constructed on the property.
6. Only signage will be single letters on building frontage.
The Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Roanoke County is petitioning to rezone approximately 0.81 acre of
land zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, to remove proffered conditions associated with
the approval of a 1987 rezoning for the use of a used car dealership.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of this area as Glenvar Village, a future
land use area intended to serve as a focal point for the Glenvar Community. Land use types proposed for the
Glenvar Village designation include community activity centers, commercial, general retail shops and personal
services, limited industrial, mixed use, office and institutional, parks and outdoor recreation/ecotourism, and
residential development. Land use determinants include access from arterial streets, proximity to existing
commercial and industrial land uses and zoning, and areas that are served by utilities.
With only 4%-5% of Roanoke County being zoned for industrial or commercial development, the removal of old and
outdated proffered conditions is necessary to provide for future development and redevelopment opportunities. This
property meets the land use determinants of the Glenvar Village future land use designation and is therefore
consistent. Additionally, the removal of old and outdated proffers aligns with the priorities of the current Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors Strategic Plan and the recommendations of the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
In 1987, Larry D. Fisher filed a petition to rezone this property from B-1, Office District, to B-3, Special
Commercial District, for the purpose of operating a used car dealership. Through adoption of Ordinance
#687-7, the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of this property with six (6) proffered conditions
specific to the proposed use car dealership use.
13 of 392
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background – In 1987, the subject property underwent a rezoning from B-1, Office District, to B-3, Special
Commercial District, for the purpose of operating a used car dealership. The Board of Supervisors approved
the rezoning with proffered conditions related to site use and development, access, and signage, and
granted a Special Exception Permit for the operation of a used car dealership (See Ordinance #687-7 for
additional information). The following proffered conditions were approved as part of the rezoning:
1. Use of the property will be limited to the sale of used automobiles.
2. No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles.
3. Development will be in general accord with the submitted concept plan, 5-11-87, including the
landscaping.
4. An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed.
5. No billboards will be constructed on the property.
6. Only signage will be single letters on building frontage.
A used car dealership was constructed in 1987 in accordance with the proffered conditions and has been
operating as such since that time.
West Main Street to its north. The south end of the property slopes sharply downward approximately 10’ to
the property to the south. The eastern portion of the property has a slight downward slope toward Shawnee
Drive. Most of the property is covered with impervious surfaces, with the dealership building located in the
center of the property, an asphalted parking lot located between the building and the western, northern, and
southern property lines, and a gravel drive between the building and the southern property line. A grass
planting strip is located between the parking lot and West Main Street and Shawnee Drive. On the
downward slope on the southern property line, there is a vegetative buffer of deciduous shrubs and trees.
3,750 square feet in size. The building includes an office area and three garage bays that face to the west.
There is one (1) exterior wall sign facing West Main Street mounted on the mansard roof of the building.
northwest corner of the property and an access point off of Shawnee Drive on the western property line.
Both access points are asphalted and lead to the parking lot which is configured for two-way traffic around
the building. Used cars that are for sale are parked at a 45-degree angle adjacent to West Main Street and
Shawnee Drive. Customer parking is at a 90-degree angle adjacent to the west side of the building.
from the city limits of Salem. The property to the north across West Main Street is zoned C-1, Low Intensity
Commercial District, and is currently vacant. The property to the east is zoned C-2, High Intensity
Commercial District, and is the location of Whitt Carpet One. The property to the south is zoned I-2, High
Intensity Industrial District, and I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District with conditions, and is developed with
a construction yard. The property to the west is zoned C-2 and is developed with a single-family dwelling.
Community Outreach – Approximately twenty (20) letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and
tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit
comments and contact information for staff. No comments have been received to date.
14 of 392
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposal to remove proffered conditions associated with this property would remove use and design
restrictions and allow for future development and redevelopment opportunities on a commercially zoned
property that meets all of the land use determinants of the Glenvar Village future land use designation. The
following is an analysis of why removal of the proffered conditions will not affect the property’s compliance
with current County regulations.
1. Use of property will be limited to the sale of used automobiles: The sale of automobiles
(used and new) is permitted in the C-2 zoning district. Removal of this proffer will not affect
the existing permitted use of the property, while also providing the opportunity for future
permitted uses in the C-2 zoning district to be developed.
2. No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles: Pursuant to Roanoke County
Code §12-124, the provisions of the inoperative motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers
code do not apply to automobile dealerships.
3. Development will be in general accord with submitted concept plan, 5-11-87, including the
landscaping: When the site was developed in 1987, it was developed in general accord with
the submitted concept plan dated 5-11-87. This condition is no longer applicable and any
future site development or landscaping will need to comply with current County regulations.
4. An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed: This additional
access point has been constructed and this proffer is no longer applicable.
5. No billboards will be constructed on the property: Pursuant to Roanoke County Code §30-
93-14, new off-premises signs, which include billboards, would be prohibited at this
location. Any other proposed signage will be required to comply with the provisions of
Roanoke County Code §30-93.
6. Only signage will be single letters on building frontage: Any new proposed signage will be
required to comply with the provision of Roanoke County Code §30-93.
Any future proposals for new development or redevelopment of this property will be reviewed for compliance
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Roanoke County 200 Plan classifies this area’s future land use designation as Glenvar Village, a future
land use area intended to serve as a focal point for the Glenvar Community. Land use types proposed for
the Glenvar Village designation include community activity centers, commercial, general retail shops and
personal services, limited industrial, mixed use, office and institutional, parks and outdoor
recreation/ecotourism, and residential development. Land use determinants include access from arterial
streets, proximity to existing commercial and industrial land uses and zoning, and areas that are served by
utilities.
This property satisfies the land use determinants of the Glenvar Village, and removal of old and outdated
proffers to allow for future development and redevelopment is consistent with this future land use
designation. In addition, this petition will conform with the recommendation of the Roanoke County 200 Plan
to remove outdated proffer conditions on certain properties to promote redevelopment and expedite the
development process.
15 of 392
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The Roanoke County Economic Development Authority is petitioning to rezone this property from C-2C,
High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, to C-2, High Intensity Commercial District, to remove
proffered conditions located at 3306 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. This property satisfies
the land use determinants of the Glenvar Village future land use designation, and the removal of old and
outdated proffers to provide for future new development and redevelopment opportunities is consistent with
the Glenvar Village. Furthermore, this petition conforms with the recommendation of the Roanoke County
200 Plan to remove outdated proffer conditions on certain properties to promote redevelopment and
expedite the development process.
CASE NUMBER: #9-7/2026
PREPARED BY: Sarah Gilmore
HEARING DATES: PC: July 7, 2026 BOS: July 14, 2026
ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials
Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use)
Photographs
Ordinance #687-7
C-2 Regulations
Glenvar Village Land Use Designation
16 of 392
17 of 392
3
Applicant Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW
REQUESTS
See Attached
See Attached
See Attached
18 of 392
PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND
This project involves the removal of proffered conditions from a commercial property in the
Glenvar Area. The property (TM#055.10-01-13.00-0000) was rezoned in June of 1987 from
B-1 Business to B-3 Business for the purpose of operating a used car dealership. As part of
the rezoning, six (6) proffered conditions offered by the property owner were accepted by
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The proffered conditions are:
• Use of the property will be limited to the sale of used automobiles.
• No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles.
• Development will be in general accord with the submitted concept plan, 5-11-87,
including the landscaping.
• An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed.
• No billboards will be constructed on the property.
• Only signage will be single letters on building frontage.
The property was developed in accordance with the proffered conditions and has been a
used car dealership for almost 40 years.
With only 4%-5% of Roanoke County being zoned for industrial or commercial
development, the removal of old and outdated proffered conditions is necessary to provide
for new development and redevelopment opportunities in the future. This strategy is
included in the Board of Supervisors Strategic Plan and the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
NEED & JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONS
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning
district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed request furthers the general purpose statement in the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance to “Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable
employment and enlarge the tax base. The proposed request also furthers the purpose of
the C-2 High Intensity Commercial district which is:
• “to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities
within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or
large areas of the county.”
• “High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major
arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population.”
• “The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses.”
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies
contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
19 of 392
The proposed project complies with the following items in the County’s Comprehensive
Plan:
The Roanoke County 200 Plan includes the following Economic Development goal and
objectives:
Economic Development: Roanoke County recognizes that a strong economy
benefits from partnering with current and potential businesses, cultivating a skilled
workforce, and fostering connectivity to the world.
• Encourage the reuse, redevelopment and occupancy of existing, vacant
commercial and industrial space.
• Provide resources and support to help retain and expand existing businesses.
• Seek new business development and investment in the County.
The Glenvar Community Plan (2012), which is part of the Roanoke County 200 Plan, also
includes the following goals:
Provide a mix of environmentally-sensitive commercial and industrial uses at
appropriate locations in the Glenvar Community that meet the needs of current and
future residents.
Maintain a healthy, safe and sustainable community that ensures opportunities for a
multi-generational community to live, work, recreate and raise a family.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan also includes the following Land Use & Housing
recommendation:
• Remove outdated proffer conditions on certain properties to promote
redevelopment and expedite the development process.
Lastly, the future land use designation for this property in the Roanoke County Plan 200 is
Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-
density residential developments are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may
parallel the central business districts in Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also
be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping
facilities. Appropriate land use types include general retail shops, restaurants, personal
services, offices, institutional uses, limited industrial uses, multi-family residential, and
mixed-use. The proposed rezoning to remove the proffered conditions from the property is
consistent with the Core future land use designation.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining
properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and
facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
20 of 392
The request to remove the proffered conditions from the property at 3306 West Main Street
will have minimal impact on the property and surrounding properties. The property is
zoned C-2 High Intensity Commercial and is currently used for used automobile sales.
Removal of the proffered conditions would allow for future by-right commercial uses in C-2
which would be compatible with surrounding uses. Surrounding uses include industrial
uses and vacant industrial zoned property to the south of the property, commercial and
industrial uses to the west, vacant commercial zoned properties to the north across West
Main Street, and commercial use to the east across Shawnee Drive. West Main Street
contains a variety of commercial, industrial, and civic uses adjacent to it in the Glenvar
area.
The removal of the proffered conditions on this existing commercially developed site will
have no or minimal impact on public services (schools, parks and recreation, police and
fire and rescue). The property is currently adequately served by public water and public
sewer. The property is located at the corner of West Main Street (a four-lane divided
highway) and Shawnee Drive with one entrance on West Main Street and one entrance on
Shawnee Drive. Right- and left-turn lanes to turn onto Shawnee Drive exist on West Main
Street. Any new uses or redevelopment of the property would be adequately served by the
existing roadway infrastructure and VDOT would review entrance permits for any new uses
or redevelopment of the site.
21 of 392
5/8/26
22 of 392
7
Community Development Planning & Zoning Division
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner,
the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application
in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic
study at any time, as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
Retail shop/Shopping center
Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
Regional public facilities
Educational/Recreational facilities
Religious assemblies
Hotel/Motel
Golf course
Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
Industrial site/Factory
Day care center
Bank
Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway
classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc)
For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is
more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
When required to evaluate access issues
Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.)
Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem
Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s)
Substantial departure from the Community Plan
Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of
the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty
(750) trips in an average day
Effective date: April 19, 2005
23 of 392
5/8/26
24 of 392
Gary Ellis Property - 3306 West Main Street
Vantor, Roanoke County
4/8/2026, 1:47:44 PM
0 0.1 0.20.05 mi
0 0.2 0.40.1 km
1:10,190
25 of 392
Gary Ellis Property - 3306 West Main Street
Maxar, Microsoft, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County
7/23/2025, 4:15:26 PM
0 0.01 0.030.01 mi
0 0.03 0.060.01 km
1:1,421
26 of 392
27 of 392
28 of 392
---
-,VIRGINIA:--F-
Page 1 of 2
x&-BEFORE THE BOARD 9F SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
a A3.93~z.acre parcel of land, )
G generally located at the northwest )
intersection of l?oute 460 and Shawnee )
Drivewithin the Catwba)
Magisterial District, and 1
recorded as parcel #55.02-2-14 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
FINAL ORDER
COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner Larry D. Fisher
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-
referenced parcel of land from E-l, Business
District to '1\ B-3, Business District for the purpose
of operatin! a used car dealership
WHEREAS, after due legal notice,the Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing of the petition on June 2 , 193it at which time,
all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHE'REAS,after full consideration,the Board of County
Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffered
conditions and Special Exception Permit on June 23, 1987
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of
land,which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel
55.92-2-14 and recorded in Deed Book 1201 pa% 264 and legally described
below,be rezoned from B-l Business District to
B-3 Business District.
29 of 392
Legal Description of Property:
:.:$:j::;.;
. . . ,.,.,. .,.
: : :: . . .::..-:::
Page 2 of 2
Tract F, containing 0.93 acres,according to the Platof the Fort
Lewis Industxial Park, made by T. P. Parker & Son, dated July 1,
1981, and recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 202, in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Poanoke County, Virginia; and
.~~~~~aportionof the sama propertyconveyedto SalemReady Mix
Concrete, Inc.,by deed dated member 29, 1983, from Joseph C.
Thomas and Susan L. Thomas, his wife, and Lewis P. Thcxnas and I
Minnie B, Thorras, his wife, of record in the Office of the Clerk
..-aforesaid in Deed Book 1201, page 264..1._,..I._.__ -
r.:.I,,: :.'.3>,I : -:..,;<.,,\.$.7...,..;,..-.- ,,,
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a.,copy of this order be transmitted tc
the Secreta& of the Planning Commission and that he be directed tc
reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County.
i e.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw
and upon the following recorded vot'e:
AYES:Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS:
ABSENT:Supervisor Johnson
m 36-M , Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc-i Real Estate Assessor
Development Review Coordinator
Director oE Planning
30 of 392
..:.:.:i:.:<:::::
.
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A--.&L-acre parcel of land,1
generally located 1
&no- ,/' SAA,'.-wrvee- i-It-8 1 PROFFER
5c MA iwe I I 4 A& i&o fr/ncKF \ 1 OF
within the 1 CONDITIONS.
Magisterial District, and 1 e-"
recorded as parcel # .<$-OJ- z- rq 1
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. 1
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:,:
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq;of the Code of
Virginia and Sec.210105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning,i
Ordinance,the Petitioner
/hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of '::'
Roanoke County,Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning
of the above-referenced parcel of land:
9 USE of -y-p--y W'AI be Li,-rED -Jo -(-&HE SlQL.& of LkFo
,&,-m--w&~.tir
3) BCVE.LOPTE~ u'rll be ;J qcl~mrn~Qccorrn wu;ru sda -;nETJ C'dct=pT ?)A J,
s-II-*-l .INCLUDING THE LANDSCAPING.
4) API ADDITIOPJAL POINT OF ACCESS FROi4 SHA!IIPIEE DRIVE !JILL BE CONSTRUCTED.
5) NO BILLBOARDS !JILL BE COriSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY.
6) ONLY SIGNAGE NILL BE SIYGLE LETTERS OF1 BUILDING FRONTAGE.
31 of 392
32 of 392
Adjacent Property Owners
Tax Map Number Property Owner / Address Property Address Zoning Existing Use
055.02-02-08.00-0000 VCD Properties LLC
3170 West Main Street (Whitt Carpet One)
South of the Property
PO Box 1067 (Construction Yard)
5116 Arrowhead Trail
West of the Property
3306 West Main Street
PO Box 908
North of the Property (Across West Main Street)
1510 Innsbrooke Drive
Julia Arthur
6618 Campbell Drive
1510 Innsbrooke Drive
33 of 392
3306 West Main Street - Aerial Map
Vantor, Roanoke County
5/13/2026, 10:44:30 AM
0 0.04 0.070.02 mi
0 0.06 0.120.03 km
1:2,841
34 of 392
R1
I2
C2C
R1
I2
R1
C1
C1
R1
I2
C1 C1
C1
R1
C1
I2
I2C
I2
C1C1
R1
C2
R1 C2
C1
I2
R1
I2
R1
I2
C2
R1
R1
I2
C1
C1
C1
R1R1
C1
C2
R1
I2
I2I2
C1
C1
R1
C1
C1
R1
C1
R1
R1
R1
R1
C1
R1
I2C
C1
C2
R1
I2
C1R1
R1
R1
R1
C1
R1
C2
I2
C1
R1
C1
R1
I2
R1
R1
C1
3306 West Main Street - Zoning
Vantor, Roanoke County
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.06 0.120.03 km
1:2,967ZONING DISRICTS
Low Density Residential
Low Intensity Commercial High Intensity Industrial
High Intensity Commercial 35 of 392
NC
GV
PI
3306 West Main Street - Future Land Use
Vantor, Roanoke County
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.06 0.120.03 km
1:2,967FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Glenvar Village
Principal Industrial
Neighborhood Conservation 36 of 392
37 of 392
38 of 392
39 of 392
40 of 392
41 of 392
42 of 392
43 of 392
44 of 392
45 of 392
46 of 392
47 of 392
---Page 1 of 2
THE BOARD SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
acre parcel of land, )
generally located
within the )
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcel #
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
FINAL ORDER
COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the
referenced parcel of land from
District District for the purpose
of
WHEREAS, after due legal notice,the Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing of the petition on June 2 ,at which time,
all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHE'REAS,after full consideration,the Board of County
Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffered
conditions and Special Exception Permit on June 23, 1987
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of
land,which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel
and recorded in Deed Book and legally described
below,be rezoned from B-l Business District to
B-3 Business District.
48 of 392
Legal Description of Property:
Page 2 of 2
Tract F, containing 0.93 acres,according to the Platof the Fort
Park, made by T. P. Parker Son, dated
1981, and recorded in Book 9, Page 202, in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit of Virginia; and
. the
Concrete, Inc., deed 29, 1983, from Joseph
Thomas and Susan L. his wife, and Lewis and
Minnie his wife, of record in the Office of the Clerk
aforesaid in Deed Book 1201, page 264..
: ,
,
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that of this order be transmitted
the of the Planning Commission and that he be directed
reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw
and upon the following recorded
AYES:Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw,
NAYS:
ABSENT:Supervisor Johnson
, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Real Estate Assessor
Development Review Coordinator
Director Planning
49 of 392
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
acre parcel of land,
generally located
PROFFER
OF
within the CONDITIONS.
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcel
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:,
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et of the Code of
Virginia and Sec. of the Roanoke County Zoning,
Ordinance, Petitioner
hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County,Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning
of the above-referenced parcel of land:
be of
3)
POINT OF DRIVE
BUILDING FRONTAGE.
50 of 392
51 of 392
(A)
(A)
1.
SEC. 30-54. - C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
(Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-54-1. - Purpose.
The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities
within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county.
This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High intensity commercial districts
are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the
county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses
permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and
core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure
compatibility with adjoining land uses.
(Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-54-2. - Permitted Uses.
The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this
ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV,
use and design standards, for those specific uses.
Residential Uses.
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 1/9
52 of 392
2.
Home Occupation, Type I *
Multi-Family Dwelling *
Two-Family Dwelling *
Civic Uses.
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Family Day Care Home *
Guidance Services
Halfway House *
Park and Ride Facility *
Post Office
Public Assembly
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 2/9
53 of 392
3.
4.
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
Office Uses.
Financial Institutions *
General Office
Medical Office
Laboratories
Commercial Uses.
Agricultural Services *
Antique Shops
Automobile Dealership *
Automobile Repair Services, Minor *
Automobile Rental/Leasing
Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail *
Bed and Breakfast *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 3/9
54 of 392
Boarding House
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools *
Commercial Indoor Amusement
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
Communications Services
Construction Sales and Services *
Consumer Repair Services
Convenience Store *
Fuel Center*
Funeral Services
Garden Center *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 4/9
55 of 392
5.
6.
Gasoline Station *
Hospital
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge
Kennel, Commercial *
Pawn Shop
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, Drive-In or Fast Food *
Restaurant, General
Retail Sales *
Short-Term Renal *
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
Industrial Uses.
Recycling Centers and Stations *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 5/9
56 of 392
(B)
1.
2.
Miscellaneous Uses.
Amateur Radio Tower *
Parking Facility *
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1*
The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*)
indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards,
for those specific uses.
Civic Uses.
Adult Care Residences
Life Care Facility
Nursing Home
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major *
Commercial Uses.
Adult Business *
Automobile Repair Services, Major *
Car Wash *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 6/9
57 of 392
3.
4.
Dance Hall
Equipment Sales and Rental *
Manufactured Home Sales *
Mini-Warehouse *
Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center
Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service *
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop *
Industrial Uses.
Custom Manufacturing *
Industry, Type I
Landfill, Rubble *
Transportation Terminal
Miscellaneous Uses.
Broadcasting Tower *
Outdoor Gatherings *
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 7/9
58 of 392
1.
a.
b.
2.
a.
b.
1.
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2*
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3*
(Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-
27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No.
052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-
21; Ord. No. 011023-4, § 1, 1-10-23; Ord. No. 111924-7,§ 1, 11-19-24; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25)
Sec. 30-54-3. - Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and
Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).
Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
Area: 15,000 square feet.
Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
Front yard:
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 8/9
59 of 392
a.
b.
2.
3.
a.
b.
4.
1.
a.
b.
1.
2.
Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line.
Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
Side yard: None.
Rear yard:
Principal structures: 15 feet.
Accessory structures: 3 feet.
Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
Height limitations:
Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop
mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and
rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet.
In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance.
Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure.
(D) Maximum coverage.
Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93)
6/12/26, 10:02 AM Roanoke County, VA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 9/9
60 of 392
Appendices
A future land use area intended to serve as focal point for the Glenvar Community. This stretch of West Main
Street is home to community identifiers such as the new Glenvar Library, Richfield Retirement Community,
Fire and Rescue Station, Fort Lewis Elementary, entrance to Glenvar Schools Complex, Pleasant Grove and
Fort Lewis Baptist Church. Because of the importance to the community, a high degree of architectural
and creative site design is encouraged to enhance the rural and historic character of the area as well as
pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between properties.
Land Use Types
A mix of uses on a parcel and/or along the West Main Street Corridor is encouraged in the Glenvar Village
designation. Land use types for the Glenvar Village designation include:
Community Activity Centers - Public and private facilities serving surrounding residents including parks,
schools, community meeting areas connected to residential areas by sidewalks, bikeways and greenways.
Commercial – Planned small-scale or clustered commercial such as local target area shopping centers
with specialty businesses, personal services and sit-down or family-style restaurants. Such facilities should be
designed to complement the character of the community.
General Retail Shops and Personal Services – Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are
encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian accommodations into
their designs to link to surrounding development.
Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like surroundings are
encouraged. Such developments should be designed to enhance the rural character of the area.
Limited Industrial - Low intensity industrial uses are encouraged to locate south of Route 11/460; such
development should be clustered and should not have an adverse impact on air or water quality, the
natural environment or scenic viewsheds.
Mixed Use – Developments that combine retail, service and other commercial uses with office and/or
residential use in the same building or on the same site.
Parks and Outdoor Recreation/Ecotourism – Public and private recreation from small-scale community-
based facilities to regional attractions with greenway linkages and bike and pedestrian accommodations.
Also encouraged are eco- and sustainable tourism businesses.
Residential - Townhouse, low density multi-family, single-family attached and two-family dwellings. Clustering
and connectivity are encouraged.
Land Use Determinants
Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where commercial or industrial uses have been developed or will likely
be developed.
Existing Zoning - Locations where commercial or industrial zoning exists.
Access - Locations served by arterial street system.
Utility Availability - Locations where water and sewer service exist.
GLENVAR VILLAGE
61 of 392
EDA of Roanoke County
Rezone approximately 0.81 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity
Commercial with Conditions, to remove proffered conditions from
the property
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing
July 14, 2026
Location Map2
Project Site
•3306 West Main Street
•0.81 acre
•Current Use: Used Car Dealership
•Request to rezone approximately 0.81 acre
zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with
Conditions, to remove proffered conditions
associated with a 1987 rezoning.
3
Aerial View4
Photographs5
Photographs6
Photographs7
Photographs8
Photographs9
Photographs10
11 Applicable Regulations
Ordinance #687-7 contains the following existing proffered conditions from a
1987 rezoning:
1.Use of the property will be limited to the sale of used automobiles.
2.No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles.
3.Development will be in general accord with the submitted concept
plan, 5-11-87, including the landscaping.
4.An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed.
5.No billboards will be constructed on the property.
6.Only signage will be single letters on building frontage.
Zoning
Existing Zoning
C-2C, High Intensity
Commercial with
Conditions
12
Surrounding Zoning
North – C-1
South – I-2 & I-2C
East – C-2
West – C-2
Future Land Use13
Glenvar Village
Appropriate land use types in
Glenvar Village include
community activity centers,
commercial uses, general retail
shops and personal services,
limited industrial, mixed use, office
and institutional uses, parks and
outdoor recreation/ecotourism,
and residential uses.
Future Land Use14
Glenvar Village
Land use determinants include
adequate access from arterial
streets, proximity to existing
commercial and industrial zoning
and land uses, and utility
availability.
The proposed rezoning to remove
the proffered conditions from the
property to allow for future
development of by-right C-2 uses
is consistent with the Glenvar
Village future land use
designation.
Planning Commission
Public Hearing – July 7, 2026
15
•No citizens spoke during the public hearing.
•The Planning Commission discussed:
•the development history of the property;
•the proffered conditions and proffer removal project process;
•the benefit of removing outdated proffered conditions for future
development and redevelopment opportunities;
•property located on a high traffic volume corridor;
•future land use designation and surrounding zoning; and
•implementing the recommendation in the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning to remove
the proffered conditions from the property
Questions?
16
ROANOKE COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
TEL: (540) 772-2071
FAX: (540) 772-2089
Peter S. Lubeck
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Rachel W. Lower
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY
ATTORNEYSSAMPLE MOTIONS
The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.81 acre of land from C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with
Conditions) to remove proffered conditions from the property located at 3306 West Main
Street
MOTION TO APPROVE
I find that the proposed rezoning request:
1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive
plan,
2. Is good zoning practice, and
3. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested.
MOTION TO DENY
I find that the proposed rezoning request:
1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive
plan,
2. Is not good zoning practice, and/or
3. Will result in substantial detriment to the community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested.
MOTION TO DELAY ACTION
I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore
MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board
of Supervisors.
62 of 392
Page 1 of 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.81 ACRE OF LAND ZONED C-2C
(HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS) TO REMOVE
PROFFERED CONDITIONS FROM PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3306 WEST MAIN
STREET (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP #055.02-02-14.00-0000), CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
63 of 392
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on July 7, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as
requested; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement have been provided as required by
law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County,
Virginia to rezone approximately 0.81 acre from C-2C (High Intensity
Commercial District with Conditions) to remove proffered conditions
associated with a 1987 rezoning from property located at 3306 West Main
Street (Roanoke County Tax Map #055.02-02-14.00-0000), in the Catawba
Magisterial District, is hereby approved.
2. The Board finds that the request as submitted is in conformance with the
Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Board further finds that approval of the request is good zoning
practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community.
4. The six (6) proffered conditions imposed on the property by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia pursuant to Ordinance #687-7 are
hereby removed.
5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final
passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district
64 of 392
Page 3 of 3
map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this
ordinance.
65 of 392
2
5
2
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
66 of 392
2
5
2
The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the rezoning to remove the
proffered conditions from the property.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of an
ordinance to rezone approximately 0.20 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial
District with Conditions, to remove proffered conditions from the property located at
5999 Franklin Road.
67 of 392
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County
Request: Rezone approximately 0.2 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with
Conditions, to remove proffered conditions from the property
Location:
Tax Parcel:
5999 Franklin Road
# 098.04-02-20.00-0000
Existing Proffered
Conditions (To Be
Removed):
1. Use of the property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the
following: Oriental/Persian rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and
antiques.
2. Signage shall be limited to a maximum of 140 square feet.
3. No off-premises signage shall be installed.
The Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County is requesting to rezone approximately 0.2 acre zoned C-
2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to remove proffered conditions associated with a 2003 rezoning from
the property located at 5999 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject property as Core. Core is a
future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-density residential developments
are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem
and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally
based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for
tax-exempt facilities. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Core future land use designation.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The subject property underwent a rezoning from AVC, Agricultural/Village Center District with conditions, to
C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with conditions, in 2003. This rezoning was approved by the Board
of Supervisors with three (3) proffered conditions. Ordinance #092303-7 contains the information from this
rezoning (ordinance attached).
The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines retail sales as “Sale or rental with incidental service of
commonly used goods and merchandise for personal or household use but excludes those classified more
specifically by these use type classifications.”
Retail sales is permitted by-right in the C-2, High Intensity Commercial District. Section 30-85-24.5 of the
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background – The subject property contains a commercial building. Roanoke County Real Estate Records 68 of 392
indicate that the building was built in 1920.
In 1991, Maxey Homes Incorporated filed a petition to rezone the subject property from B-1, Office District
to B-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions. This rezoning was approved by the Board of
Supervisors in October of 1991. Ordinance #102291-13 contains the information from this rezoning
(ordinance attached). The following proffered condition was approved as part of this rezoning:
1. The use of the property as a B-2 use will be limited to antique shops.
In 1992, Roanoke County underwent a comprehensive rezoning. This resulted in the subject parcel being
rezoned from B-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to AVC, Agricultural/Village Center District
with Conditions.
In 2003, Richard Anderson filed a petition to rezone the subject property from AVC, Agricultural/Village
Center District with Conditions, to C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions. This rezoning
was approved by the Board of Supervisors in September of 2003 (Ordinance #092303-7 attached). The
following proffered conditions were approved as part of this rezoning.
1. Use of the property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the following: Oriental/Persian
rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and antiques.
2. Signage shall be limited to a maximum of 140 square feet.
3. No off-premises signage shall be installed.
Following the 2003 rezoning, Oriental Rugs Gallery operated on the subject property in accordance with the
proffered conditions. In May of 2009, Oriental Rugs Gallery filed a petition to rezone the subject property
from C-2C, High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions to C-2, High Intensity Commercial District and
to obtain a Special Use Permit for equipment sales and rentals, to remove proffered conditions and expand
the existing business to include farm equipment sales. This rezoning request was withdrawn by the
applicant in July of 2009.
The current property owners, Cahas Valley Properties LLC, purchased the property in April of 2020. In
January of 2025, Christy Rutrough applied for a business license for Abide to operate in the existing building
located at 5999 Franklin Road. Abide is a retail establishment that sells home goods, coffee, and baked
goods. Abide has been operating at 5999 Franklin Road since early 2025.
Department of Transportation right-of-way and is paved. This is the location of the majority of the parking for
the site. The area to the south of the building is also paved. To the north of the building is a flat grassy area.
To the west of the building there is a slope with an elevation change of approximately twelve (12) feet. This
slope is grassy and contains several small shrubs. There is a gravel road that leads to the single-family
dwelling located on the parcel directly to the west of the subject property that runs along the western
property line. The subject property is located in the floodplain. Portions of the existing building are in the
flood way, 100-year flood plain, and 500-year flood plain.
Site Layout/Architecture – The subject parcel contains a one-story commercial building that is approximately
2,868 square feet. There is a freestanding sign located to the east of the building. The existing parking for
the site is located to the west of the building in the Virginia Department of Transportation right-of-way
Access/Traffic Circulation – The site is located on Route 220 (Franklin Road). Franklin Road is a major, high
69 of 392
Road.
Surrounding Neighborhood – The subject property is located in south Roanoke County on Franklin Road
approximately a quarter of a mile south of Yellow Mountain Road and a quarter of a mile north of Back
Creek Road. The property is entirely surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by property zoned AV,
Agricultural/Village Center District. Beyond the property zoned AV to the west and east is property zoned
AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District. The subject property is primarily surrounded by large
residential and vacant properties. To the southeast of the property there is a church and a commercial
establishment on Franklin Road.
Community Outreach – Approximately 12 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants
which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions for how to submit comments
and contact information for staff. No citizen comments have been received on this application.
3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposal to remove proffered conditions associated with this property would remove restrictions and
allow for future development and redevelopment opportunities on a commercially zoned property that is
consistent with the Core future land use designation. The following is an analysis of why removal of the
proffered conditions will not affect the property’s compliance with current County regulations.
1. Use of property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the following: Oriental/Persian
rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and antiques: Retail sales is permitted in the C-2
zoning district. Removal of this proffer will not affect the existing use of the property, while
also providing the opportunity for future permitted uses in the C-2 zoning district to be
developed. Site constraints will also limit the type of commercial uses that could be
developed on this property.
2. Signage shall be limited to 140 square feet. Any new proposed signage will be required to
comply with the provision of Roanoke County Code §30-93.
3. No off-premises signage shall be installed: Pursuant to Roanoke County Code §30-93-14,
new off-premises signs, which include billboards, would be prohibited at this location. Any
other proposed signage will be required to comply with the provisions of Roanoke County
Code §30-93.
Any future proposals for new development or redevelopment of this property will be reviewed for compliance
Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application:
Fire and Rescue – Fire and Rescue does not object to this project and it will not increase the services were
provide.
Floodplain – No floodplain objection to proposed zoning changes. It is noted that FEMA’s
PRELIMINARY maps indicate increased flooding risk compared to the current flood maps
for this property.
General Services – I have reviewed this request and do not see any issues, nor do I have comments, for
General Services.
Transportation – It appears that existing parking in front of the retail building may be located entirely within 70 of 392
uses will likely be constrained by the existing parking available for the site.
VDOT – It appears from the information provided that removing proffers for continued retail use on this
property will not adversely impact the VDOT right-of-way. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the
parcel or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting.
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject property as Core.
Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-density residential
developments are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of
Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail
uses and regionally based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not
appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Core future land use
designation.
The recommendations of the Roanoke County 200 Plan include removing outdated proffer conditions on
certain properties to promote redevelopment and expedite the development process.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County is requesting to rezone approximately 0.2 acre
zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to remove proffered conditions associated with a
2003 rezoning from the property located at 5999 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject property as Core.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Core future land use designation.
CASE NUMBER: #10-7/2026
PREPARED BY: Skylar Camerlinck
HEARING DATES: PC: July 7, 2026 BOS: July 14, 2026
ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials
Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use)
Photographs
Ordinance #102291-13
Ordinance #092303-7
C-2 District Regulations
Core Future Land Use Designation
71 of 392
72 of 392
3
Applicant Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW
REQUESTS
See Attached
See Attached
See Attached
73 of 392
PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND
This project involves the removal of proffered conditions from a commercial property along
Route 220 (Franklin Road), south of Yellow Mountain Road, but north of Back Creek Road.
The property (TM#098.04-02-20.00-0000) was rezoned in September of 2004 from AVC,
Agricultural/Village Center District with conditions, to C-2C High Intensity Commercial
District with conditions, for limited retail sales. As part of the rezoning, three (3) proffered
conditions offered by the property owner were accepted by the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors. The proffered conditions are:
• Use of the property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the following:
Oriental/Persian rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and antiques.
• Signage shall be limited to a maximum of 140 square feet.
• No off-premises signage shall be installed.
With only 4%-5% of Roanoke County being zoned for industrial or commercial
development, the removal of old and outdated proffered conditions is necessary to provide
for new development and redevelopment opportunities in the future. This strategy is
included in the Board of Supervisors Strategic Plan and the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
NEED & JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONS
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning
district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed request furthers the general purpose statement in the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance to “Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable
employment and enlarge the tax base. The proposed request also furthers the purpose of
the C-2 High Intensity Commercial district which is:
• “to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities
within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or
large areas of the county.”
• “High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major
arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population.”
• “The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses.”
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies
contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed project complies with the following items in the County’s Comprehensive
Plan:
74 of 392
The Roanoke County 200 Plan includes the following Economic Development goal and
objectives:
Economic Development: Roanoke County recognizes that a strong economy
benefits from partnering with current and potential businesses, cultivating a skilled
workforce, and fostering connectivity to the world.
• Encourage the reuse, redevelopment and occupancy of existing, vacant
commercial and industrial space.
• Provide resources and support to help retain and expand existing businesses.
• Seek new business development and investment in the County.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan also includes the following Land Use & Housing
recommendation:
• Remove outdated proffer conditions on certain properties to promote
redevelopment and expedite the development process.
Lastly, the future land use designation for this property in the Roanoke County Plan 200 is
Core. Core is a future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-
density residential developments are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may
parallel the central business districts in Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core areas may also
be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping
facilities. Appropriate land use types include general retail shops, restaurants, personal
services, offices, institutional uses, limited industrial uses, multi-family residential, and
mixed-use. The removal of the proffered conditions is consistent with the Core future land
use designation.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining
properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and
facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The request to remove the proffered conditions from the property at 5999 Franklin Road will
have minimal impact on the property and surrounding properties. The property is zoned C-
2C High Intensity Commercial with conditions and is currently used for limited retail sales.
Removal of the proffered conditions would allow for future by-right commercial uses in C-
2, but the size of the parcel (0.2 acre) would limit more intensive commercial uses from
locating on the site. Cahas Valley Properties, LLC owns several vacant properties adjacent
to the proposed rezoning on the north, south, and west sides. A residence and a church are
located to the east across Route 220, a four-lane divided highway. Any impacts to these
properties would be minimal.
The removal of the proffered conditions on this existing commercially developed site will
have no or minimal impact on public services (schools, parks and recreation, police and
fire and rescue). The property is currently adequately served by public water and private
sewer. The property is located along Route 220 (a four-lane divided highway) with a median
75 of 392
break along Route 220 to provide access to the site for northbound traffic. Any new uses or
redevelopment of the property would be adequately served by the existing roadway
infrastructure and VDOT would review entrance permits for any new uses or redevelopment
of the site.
76 of 392
77 of 392
7
Community Development Planning & Zoning Division
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner,
the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application
in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic
study at any time, as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
Retail shop/Shopping center
Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
Regional public facilities
Educational/Recreational facilities
Religious assemblies
Hotel/Motel
Golf course
Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
Industrial site/Factory
Day care center
Bank
Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway
classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc)
For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is
more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
When required to evaluate access issues
Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.)
Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem
Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s)
Substantial departure from the Community Plan
Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of
the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty
(750) trips in an average day
Effective date: April 19, 2005
78 of 392
79 of 392
80 of 392
81 of 392
82 of 392
83 of 392
AsM ml4 /qr
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1991
ORDINANCE 102291-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.20 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF US 220, RED
HILL AREA,(TAX MAP NO.98.04-2-20) IN THE
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-l, OFFICE DISTRICT,
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF MAXEY HOMES INCORPORATED
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July
23,1991,and the second reading and public hearing was held
October 22, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as fol lows:
1 .That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 0.20 acre, as described herein, and located on
the west side of US Route 220, Red Hill area,(Tax Map Number
98.04-2-20) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District,is hereby
changed from the zoning classification of B-l, Office District, to
the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District.
2.That this action is taken upon the application of Maxey
Homes Incorporated.
3 .That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
a.The use of the property as a B-2 use will be limited
84 of 392
to antique shops.
4 .That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron on the west side of US Route 220 at
the southerly corner of the 0.20 acre tract being herein
described:thence with a new division line through the
property of Howard T. Campbell estate, N. 63 deg. 35' W.
30 feet to an iron: thence N. 20 deg. 31' W. 30.9 feet
to an iron: thence N. 6 deg. 27' W. 79.7 feet to an iron:
thence N. 15 deg. 26' W. 130 feet to an iron: thence
still with a new division line N. 66 deg. 08' E. 60.8
feet to an iron on the west side of a driveway, which
driveway is not included in the real property hereby
conveyed: thence S. 23 deg.43' E. 93.35 feet to an iron
on the west side of US Route 220; thence with the west
line of US Route 220 S. 3 deg. 37' W. 186.3 feet to the
BEGINNING and containing 0.20 acre and being as more
fully shown on survey made by T. P. Parker, S.C.E. dated
12 June 1965.
5 .That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage.All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS:None
A COPY TESTE:
r;v)*jQ/*-
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc:File
Arnold Covey, Director,Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director,Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney,County Attorney
85 of 392
86 of 392
87 of 392
88 of 392
89 of 392
90 of 392
91 of 392
92 of 392
93 of 392
94 of 392
95 of 392
96 of 392
97 of 392
98 of 392
99 of 392
100 of 392
101 of 392
102 of 392
103 of 392
AsM ml4 /qr
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1991
ORDINANCE 102291-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.20 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF US 220, RED
HILL AREA,(TAX MAP NO.98.04-2-20) IN THE
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-l, OFFICE DISTRICT,
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF MAXEY HOMES INCORPORATED
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July
23,1991,and the second reading and public hearing was held
October 22, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as fol lows:
1 .That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 0.20 acre, as described herein, and located on
the west side of US Route 220, Red Hill area,(Tax Map Number
98.04-2-20) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District,is hereby
changed from the zoning classification of B-l, Office District, to
the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District.
2.That this action is taken upon the application of Maxey
Homes Incorporated.
3 .That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
a.The use of the property as a B-2 use will be limited
104 of 392
to antique shops.
4 .That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron on the west side of US Route 220 at
the southerly corner of the 0.20 acre tract being herein
described:thence with a new division line through the
property of Howard T. Campbell estate, N. 63 deg. 35' W.
30 feet to an iron: thence N. 20 deg. 31' W. 30.9 feet
to an iron: thence N. 6 deg. 27' W. 79.7 feet to an iron:
thence N. 15 deg. 26' W. 130 feet to an iron: thence
still with a new division line N. 66 deg. 08' E. 60.8
feet to an iron on the west side of a driveway, which
driveway is not included in the real property hereby
conveyed: thence S. 23 deg.43' E. 93.35 feet to an iron
on the west side of US Route 220; thence with the west
line of US Route 220 S. 3 deg. 37' W. 186.3 feet to the
BEGINNING and containing 0.20 acre and being as more
fully shown on survey made by T. P. Parker, S.C.E. dated
12 June 1965.
5 .That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage.All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS:None
A COPY TESTE:
r;v)*jQ/*-
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc:File
Arnold Covey, Director,Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director,Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney,County Attorney
105 of 392
1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2004
ORDINANCE 092303-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A .37-ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT 5999 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP
NO.98.04-2-20) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AVC
WITH CONDITIONS TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF
RICHARD ANDERSON
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 26, 2003, and
the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 2003; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on September 2, 2003; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by
law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .37
acres, as described herein, and located at 5999 Franklin Road (Tax Map Number
98.04-2-20) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of AVC, Agricultural Village District, with conditions, to the zoning
classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with conditions.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Richard Anderson.
3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
hereby accepts:
106 of 392
2
(1) Use of the property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the
following: Oriental/Persian rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and antiques.
(2) Signage shall be limited to a maximum of 140 square feet.
(3) No off-premises signage shall be installed.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron on the west side of U. S. Route 220 at the southerly
corner of the .20 acre tract being herein described; thence with a new division line
through the property of Howard T. Campbell estate, N. 63° 35’ W. 30 feet to an iron;
thence N. 6° 27’ W. 79.7 feet to an iron; thence N. 15° 26’ W. 130 feet to an iron; thence
still with a new division line N. 66° 08’ E. 60.8 feet to an iron on the west side of a
driveway, which driveway is not included in the real property hereby conveyed; thence
S. 23° 43’ E. 93.35 feet to an iron on the west side of U. S. Route 220; thence with the
west line of U. S. Route 220, S. 3° 37’ W. 186.3 feet to the Beginning and containing .20
acre and being as more fully shown on survey made by T. P. Parker, SCE, dated 12
June 1965.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
___________________________________
Brenda J. Holton, CMC
Deputy Clerk
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 107 of 392
(A)
(A)
1.
2.
SEC. 30-54. - C-2 HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
(Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-54-1. - Purpose.
The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related
activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large
areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. High
intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares
which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of
retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with
the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the
comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with
adjoining land uses.
(Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
Sec. 30-54-2. - Permitted Uses.
The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained
in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as
listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
Residential Uses.
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Multi-Family Dwelling *
Two-Family Dwelling *
Civic Uses.
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
108 of 392
3.
4.
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Family Day Care Home *
Guidance Services
Halfway House *
Park and Ride Facility *
Post Office
Public Assembly
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
Office Uses.
Financial Institutions *
General Office
Medical Office
Laboratories
Commercial Uses.
Agricultural Services *
Antique Shops
Automobile Dealership *
Automobile Repair Services, Minor *
Automobile Rental/Leasing
Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail *
Bed and Breakfast *
Boarding House
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools *
109 of 392
Commercial Indoor Amusement
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
Communications Services
Construction Sales and Services *
Consumer Repair Services
Convenience Store *
Fuel Center*
Funeral Services
Garden Center *
Gasoline Station *
Hospital
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge
Kennel, Commercial *
Pawn Shop
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, Drive-In or Fast Food *
Restaurant, General
Retail Sales *
Short-Term Renal *
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
110 of 392
5.
6.
(B)
1.
2.
Industrial Uses.
Recycling Centers and Stations *
Miscellaneous Uses.
Amateur Radio Tower *
Parking Facility *
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1*
The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk
(*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and
design standards, for those specific uses.
Civic Uses.
Adult Care Residences
Life Care Facility
Nursing Home
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major *
Commercial Uses.
Adult Business *
Automobile Repair Services, Major *
Car Wash *
Dance Hall
Equipment Sales and Rental *
Manufactured Home Sales *
Mini-Warehouse *
Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center
Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service *
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop *
111 of 392
3.
4.
1.
a.
b.
2.
a.
b.
1.
a.
Industrial Uses.
Custom Manufacturing *
Industry, Type I
Landfill, Rubble *
Transportation Terminal
Miscellaneous Uses.
Broadcasting Tower *
Outdoor Gatherings *
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2*
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3*
(Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-
11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1,
4-22-08; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16;
Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 011023-4, § 1, 1-10-23; Ord. No. 111924-7,§ 1, 11-19-24; Ord. No.
072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25)
Sec. 30-54-3. - Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV,
Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).
Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
Area: 15,000 square feet.
Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
Front yard:
Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front
building line.
112 of 392
b.
2.
3.
a.
b.
4.
1.
a.
b.
1.
2.
Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
Side yard: None.
Rear yard:
Principal structures: 15 feet.
Accessory structures: 3 feet.
Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
Height limitations:
Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop
mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required
side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in
height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by
this ordinance.
Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure.
(D) Maximum coverage.
Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93)
113 of 392
Appendices
A future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-density residential developments
are encouraged. Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem
and Vinton. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally
based shopping facilities. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for
tax-exempt facilities.
Land Use Types
General Retail Shops, Restaurants and Personal Services - Planned shopping centers and clustered retail
uses are encouraged. These centers should incorporate greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into their
designs and link them to surrounding neighborhoods.
Office and Institutional - Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like settings are encouraged.
Limited Industrial – Low intensity industrial uses that should not have an adverse impact on air or water
quality.
Multi-Family Residential – Multi-family residential developments up to 24 units per acre.
Mixed-Use – Developments that combine retail, service and other commercial uses with office and/or
residential uses in the same building or on the same site.
Land Use Determinants
Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where commercial uses have been developed or will likely be
developed.
Existing Zoning - Locations where commercial zoning exists.
Access - Locations served by an arterial street system.
Population Center - Locations within close proximity to the projected population concentrations.
Urban Sector - Locations served by urban services.
CORE
114 of 392
EDA of Roanoke County
Rezone approximately 0.2 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity
Commercial with Conditions, to remove proffered conditions from
the property
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing
July 14, 2026
115 of 392
Location Map2
116 of 392
Project Site
•5999 Franklin Road
•0.2 Acre
•Current Use: Retail Sales
•Request to rezone approximately 0.2
acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity
Commercial with Conditions, to
remove proffered conditions
associated with a 2003 rezoning.
3
117 of 392
Aerial View4
118 of 392
Photographs5
119 of 392
Photographs6
120 of 392
Photographs7
121 of 392
Photographs8
122 of 392
Photographs9
123 of 392
Photographs10
124 of 392
11 Zoning Background
Ordinance 092303-7 contains the following existing proffered conditions from a
2003 rezoning:
1.Use of the property will be restricted to the sale and storage of the
following: Oriental/Persian rugs, area rugs and flooring materials and
antiques.
2.Signage shall be limited to a maximum of 140 square feet.
3.No off-premises signage shall be installed.
125 of 392
Zoning
Existing Zoning
C-2C, High Intensity
Commercial with
Conditions
12
Surrounding Zoning
North – AV, Agricultural/
Village Center District
South – AV
East – AV and AG-1,
Agricultural/Rural Low
Density District
West – AV and AG-1
126 of 392
Future Land Use13
Core
•A future land use area where high intensity urban commercial and high-density residential developments are encouraged.
•Land uses within core areas may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton.
•Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities.
•Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities.
•The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Core future land use designation.
127 of 392
Planning Commission
Public Hearing – July 7, 2026
14
•No citizens spoke during the public hearing.
•The Planning Commission discussed:
•the development history of the property;
•the proffered conditions and proffer removal project process;
•the benefit of removing outdated proffered conditions for future
development and redevelopment opportunities;
•property located on a high traffic volume corridor;
•future land use designation and surrounding zoning; and
•implementing the recommendation in the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning to remove
the proffered conditions from the property
128 of 392
Questions?
15
129 of 392
ROANOKE COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
TEL: (540) 772-2071
FAX: (540) 772-2089
Peter S. Lubeck
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Rachel W. Lower
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY
ATTORNEYSSAMPLE MOTIONS
The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.2 acre zoned C-2C (High Intensity Commercial District with Conditions)
to remove proffered conditions from the property located at 5999 Franklin Road
MOTION TO APPROVE
I find that the proposed rezoning request:
1. Is consistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive
plan,
2. Is good zoning practice, and
3. Will not result in substantial detriment to the community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the rezoning request as it has been requested.
MOTION TO DENY
I find that the proposed rezoning request:
1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive
plan,
2. Is not good zoning practice, and/or
3. Will result in substantial detriment to the community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the rezoning request as it has been requested.
MOTION TO DELAY ACTION
I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore
MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board
of Supervisors.
130 of 392
Page 1 of 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.2 ACRE ZONED C-2C (HIGH
INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS) TO REMOVE
PROFFERED CONDITIONS FROM PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5999 FRANKLIN
ROAD (ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP #098.04-02-20.00-0000), CAVE SPRING
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
131 of 392
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on July 7, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition as
requested; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement have been provided as required by
law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County,
Virginia to rezone approximately 0.2 acre from C-2C (High Intensity
Commercial District with Conditions) to remove proffered conditions
associated with a 2003 rezoning from property located at 5999 Franklin
Road (Roanoke County Tax Map #098.04-02-20.00-0000), in the Cave
Spring Magisterial District, is hereby approved.
2. The Board finds that the request as submitted is in conformance with the
Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Board further finds that approval of the request is good zoning
practice, and will not result in substantial detriment to the community.
4. The three (3) proffered conditions imposed on the property by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia pursuant to Ordinance #092303-
7 are hereby removed.
5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final
passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district
132 of 392
Page 3 of 3
map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this
ordinance.
133 of 392
1
9
3
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Rhonda Perdue, Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals):
Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT):
Roanoke County Local Finance Board:
Roanoke County Planning Commission (By District):
134 of 392
1
9
3
Newton to fulfill the unexpired term of Kelly McMurray representing the Cave Spring
Magisterial District. This term will expire June 30, 2029.
Social Services Advisory Board (At-Large):
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
135 of 392
Page 1 of 2
A T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM F - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 14, 2026,
designated as Item F - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 15 inclusive, as
follows:
1. Approval of minutes – June 23, 2026
2. Request to accept and allocate $24,610 from the Virginia Department of Criminal
Justice Services, Byrne-Justice Assistance Grant along with a local match of $8,204
local match for a total of $32,814.
3. Ordinance Approving the Second Amended and Restated Intergovernmental
Agreement Regarding the Roanoke Valley Greenway. (Second Reading)
4. Ordinance Repealing the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement
Establishing the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. (Second Reading)
5. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a Second Antenna Site
Use Agreement and Ground Lease with the New River Valley 911 Authority for use
of property located at 8449 Honeysuckle Road. (Second Reading)
6. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $19,483.82 to the Clerk of the
Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia.
7. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $102,071.84 from the
Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the "Four-for-Life" distribution.
136 of 392
Page 2 of 2
8. The petition of Network Towers II, LLC to obtain a special use permit to construct a
wireless communication facility approximately 199 feet in height on approximately
2.62 acres zoned I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, located at 0 Meacham Road
and 6155 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (First Reading and
Request for Second Reading and Public Hearing)
9. The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 1.36 acres zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions,
to remove proffered conditions from the property located at 2222 Electric Road,
Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading
and Public Hearing)
10. Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept
New Pleasant Way in the Catawba Magisterial District into the VDOT Secondary
Road System.
11. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $41,527.87 from the
U.S. Department of Justice’s Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) along
with a local match of $48,472.11 for a total of $89,999.98 to the Roanoke County
Police Department.
12. Ordinance Accepting and Appropriating $328,811 from the Virginia Department of
Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) for use by the Roanoke County Police Department
for eight School Resource Officers. (First Reading and Request for Second
Reading)
13. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $6,431.40 from the
U.S. Department of Justice’s Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) to
the Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office.
14. Resolution Directing the Roanoke County Planning Commission to Study and
Provide Recommendation Regarding Whether to Amend or Repeal the Provisions of
Section 30-58 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Which Section Establishes
the Clearbrook Village Overlay District.
15. Request to approve the holiday schedule for calendar year 2027.
137 of 392
Page 1 of 6
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Minutes
June 23, 2026 – 2:00 p.m.
Please Note: There is no 6:00 p.m. evening session because there are no public
hearings scheduled.
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the only regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June
2026. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5)
years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
Before the meeting was called to order, an invocation/a moment of silence was observed. The
1.Roll Call
Present: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Absent: None
Staff Present: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator; Doug Blount, Deputy
County Administrator; Madeline Hanlon, Assistant County
Administrator; Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney; Amy Whittaker,
Public Information Officer and Rhonda D. Perdue, Chief Deputy
Clerk to the Board
B.REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
C.PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
Action No. 062326-1 Item C.1
1.Resolution recognizing Dr. Ken Nicely for his distinguished service to Roanoke County
Public Schools and the Roanoke County Community. (Tammy E. Shepherd, Chair,
Vinton Magisterial District)
Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion.
Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None 138 of 392
Page 2 of 6
D.NEW BUSINESS
Action No. 062326-2 Item D.1
1.Resolution supporting SMART SCALE applications by Roanoke County, the Roanoke
Valley Transportation Planning Organization and the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany
Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion.
Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
Action No. 062326-3 Item D.2
2.Resolution supporting the design and limited access control changes for the Interstate
81 Widening Project from Exit 128 to Exit 137, Catawba Magisterial District. (Megan
Supervisor North moved to adopt the resolution. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion.
Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
E.FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
Action No. 062326-4 Item E.1
Agreement Regarding the Roanoke Valley Greenway. (Richard L. Caywood, County
Supervisor North moved to approve the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling the
second reading for July14, 2026. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion
approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
Action No. 062326-5 Item E.2
2.Ordinance Repealing the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement
Establishing the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. (Richard L. Caywood, County
139 of 392
Page 3 of 6
Supervisor Hooker moved to approve the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling the
second reading for July 14, 2026. Supervisor North seconded the motion. Motion approved.
1.The petition of Travis Bell to obtain a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel
on approximately 2.0 acres zoned AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, located
at 6754 Grubb Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Director of
G.APPOINTMENTS
Action No. 062326-6 Item G.1-5
Deborah George - term to expire June 28, 2030
2. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
Paul M. Mahoney – term to expires June 30, 2029
-Alleghany Regional Commission
David F. Radford - term to expire June 30, 2029
Phil C. North - term to expire June 30, 2029
Richard L. Caywood - term to expire June 30, 2029
Phil C. North - term to expire June 30, 2029
David F. Radford - term to expire June 30, 2029
Tim Rowe - term to expire June 30, 2030
Supervisor Hooker moved to approve all appointments. Supervisor Mahoney seconded the
motion. Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
H.CONSENT AGENDA
Action No. 062326-7.a-f Item H.1-6
140 of 392
Page 4 of 6
BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY
Action No. 062326-7.a Item H.1
1. Approval of minutes – May 26, 2026
Action No. 062326-7.b Item H.2
2.Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $34,446.46 from Virginia
9-1-1 Services Board for NG911 costs.
Action No. 062326-7.c Item H.3
3.Request to accept and allocate an additional $25,000 from the Department of Juvenile
Justice for the FY2026 Virginia Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) grant budget
Action No. 062326-7.d Item H.4
4.The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.81 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to
Catawba Magiste
Action No. 062326-7.e Item H.5
5.Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to enter into a Second Antenna Site
Use Agreement and Ground Lease with the New River Valley 911 Authority for use of
property located at 8449 Honeysuckle Road. (First Reading and Request for Second
Action No. 062326-7.f Item H.6
6.The petition of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County to rezone
approximately 0.20 acre zoned C-2C, High Intensity Commercial with Conditions, to
remove proffered conditions from the property located at 5999 Franklin Road, Cave
Spring Magisterial District. (First Reading and Request for Second Reading and Public
Supervisor Mahoney moved to adopt all matters on the consent agenda. Supervisor Hooker
seconded the motion. Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
I.CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
This time has been set aside for Roanoke County citizens to address the Board on matters
of interest or concern. Roanoke County citizens are defined as current residents of Roanoke
County. While the Board desires to hear from all who desire to speak, this agenda item is
limited to a duration of 30 minutes. Each individual speaker shall be afforded 3 minutes to
speak.
141 of 392
Page 5 of 6
Two (2) citizens spoke against the MVP Boost Project and requested the Board to adopt a
resolution objecting to this project.
Action No. 062326-8 Item J.1-6
1.Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves Report
2.Outstanding Debt Report
3.Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of May 31, 2026
4.Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as
of May 31, 2026
5.Accounts Paid – May 2026
6.Statement of the Treasurer’s Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of
May 31, 2026
Supervisor Mahoney moved to receive and file the reports that have been included with
the agenda under Item J. Supervisor Radford seconded the motion. Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
K.REPORTS AND INQUIRES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Paul M. Mahoney
2. David F. Radford
3. Phil C. North
4. Martha B. Hooker
Supervisors were offered the opportunity to share comments and provide updates to their
peers and the public on items of interest to them.
062326-9
1.Section 2.2-3711(A)(5) of the Code of Virginia, for discussion concerning a prospective
business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no
previous announcement has been made of the business’ or industry’s interest in
locating or expanding its facilities in the community. The Board will discuss potential
2.Section 2.2-3711(A)(1) of the Code of Virginia to conduct the annual performance
evaluations of the County Administrator and County Attorney.142 of 392
Page 6 of 6
Supervisor Shepherd moved to go to closed session. Supervisor North seconded the motion.
Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
M.CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
Action No. 062326-10
In the closed session just concluded, nothing was discussed except the matter which was
identified in the motion to convene in closed session. Only those matters lawfully permitted
to be discussed under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act were discussed.
Mahoney moved to adopt the certification resolution. Supervisor
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
.
Action No. 062326-11
Supervisor North moved to adjourn the meeting. Supervisor Hooker seconded the motion.
Motion approved.
Ayes: Supervisors Radford, Hooker, North, Mahoney, Shepherd
Nays: None
Submitted by: Approved by:
__________________________ __________________________
Richard L. Caywood Tammy E. Shepherd
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Chair
143 of 392
2
2
2
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Michael Poindexter, Chief of Police
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
144 of 392
2
2
2
Fiscal Impact:
The total project funding awarded by the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice
Services is $32,814 which includes a 25% local match of $8,204. The required match
will come from the Police Department’s fiscal year 2026-2027 operating budget.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of the grant funds to the Police
Department in the amount of $24,610 with the required local match of $8,204 for a total
of $32,814 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.
145 of 392
May 27, 2026
Mr. Richard Caywood
County Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
RE: FY26 Byrne Justice Assistance Equip and Training
Dear Mr. Richard Caywood:
We are pleased to inform you that your organization has been awarded a grant under the funding opportunity listed
above. Your DCJS grant award number is 567828 and was approved for a total budget of $32,814, through federal
funding. The project period is 6/1/2026 through 9/30/2026.
Included with this letter is your Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA), Special Conditions, Reporting
Requirements, and Projected Due Dates. Please review these materials carefully. In addition, there may
be Encumbrances, action items related to your grant award, that require your immediate attention. If applicable, these
must be addressed and submitted through the On-line Grants Management System (OGMS) at
https://ogms.dcjs.virginia.gov.
We are committed to supporting you throughout the life of your grant and are available to assist in any way to help
ensure your project’s success. To formally accept the award and its conditions, please sign the enclosed Statement of
Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA) and return it electronically within 60 days to grantsmgmt@dcjs.virginia.gov. If you
have questions, contact your DCJS Grant Monitor Carolyn Dellorso at (804) 845-1200 or via email at
carolyn.dellorso@dcjs.virginia.gov.
Sincerely,
Ashaki McNeil
Director
146 of 392
STATEMENT OF GRANT AWARD (SOGA)
Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services
1100 Bank Street, 12th Floor
Richmond, VA 23219
FY26 Byrne Justice Assistance Equip and Training
Please note grant awards are contingent on the availability of funding.
Roanoke, County 567828
GX4HPU2KPHE3
6/1/2026 9/30/2026
15PBJA-22-GG-00616-MUMU $3,990,366
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program
16.738 BJA 10/1/2021
To strengthen Crime Control.
Mr. Patrick Pascoe
Commander
5925 Cove Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
540-777-5258
ppascoe@roanokecountyva.gov
County Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
540-776-7190
rcaywood@roanokecountyva.gov
Financial Analyst
5402 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
540-286-8137
jpegram@roanokecountyva.gov
*If applicable, please indicate your Indirect Cost Rate in the space provided and attach written documentation if not using the de minimis.
As the duly authorized representative, the undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Awards (SOGA) and reviewing the Special
Conditions, hereby accepts this grant and agrees to the conditions and provisions of all other Federal and State laws and rules and regulations that
apply to this award. If there has been a change in an authorized official, cross out the information on the document and write the new contact
information. Do not electronically alter this document.
Authorized Official (Project Administrator)
147 of 392
2
3
4
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
148 of 392
2
3
4
1.Administrative Shift: RVARC assumes primary responsibility for planning,
supporting, coordinating, and engaging the community regarding the greenway
system. These duties will be incorporated directly into RVARC’s annual Work Plan.
2.Committee Transition: The standalone Greenway Commission will cease to exist
as an independent board. It will be reconstituted as RVARC's Greenway
Committee, serving in an advisory role to assist RVARC with planning updates,
funding solicitations, and public-private partnerships.
3.Locality Ownership: Individual greenways will continue to be owned and
operated by the specific locality in which they are physically located.
4.Funding Structure: The participating localities will fund the RVARC greenway
budget using the same calculation model applied to the Roanoke Valley
Transportation Planning Organization (TPO).
The new contract explicitly replaces and repeals the 2016 agreement. While the original
commission operated under Section 15.2-1300, the new contract is an intergovernmental
agreement executed in accordance with the Regional Cooperation Act and is not intended
to be a joint exercise of powers.
The reorganization will take effect on July 1, 2026.
There have been no changes since the first reading held on June 23, 2026.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the administrative reorganization or the
adoption of this ordinance. Long-term regional greenway planning costs will be
absorbed into the RVARC Work Plan as outlined in the underlying agreement.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
149 of 392
2
1
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING THE ROANOKE
VALLEY GREENWAY
et. seq. of the Code of Virginia); and
150 of 392
2
1
2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Second Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement
Regarding the Roanoke Valley Greenway is hereby approved.
2. The Board authorizes the County Administrator, Deputy County
Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, any of whom may act, to
execute the agreement in such form as is approved by the County Attorney.
3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
151 of 392
2
3
6
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
152 of 392
2
3
6
Approval of the attached ordinance authorizes the first reading on June 23, 2026. The
second reading will be set for July 14, 2026, with the formal repeal taking effect on July
15, 2026.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the administrative reorganization or the
repealing of the independent Commission. Long-term regional greenway planning costs
will be absorbed into the RVARC Work Plan as outlined in the companion agreement.
Staff Recommendation:
153 of 392
2
1
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE REPEALING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE
ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION
154 of 392
2
6
6
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Rachel W. Lower, Deputy County Attorney
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
155 of 392
2
6
6
There have been no changes to this agenda item since the first reading.
Fiscal Impact:
Roanoke County will receive income from the New River Valley 911 Authority in the
amounts indicated above.
Staff Recommendation:
156 of 392
157 of 392
158 of 392
159 of 392
160 of 392
161 of 392
162 of 392
163 of 392
164 of 392
165 of 392
Page 1 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO
ENTER INTO A SECOND ANTENNA SITE USE AGREEMENT AND
GROUND LEASE WITH THE NEW RIVER VALLEY 911 AUTHORITY
FOR USE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8449 HONEYSUCKLE ROAD
166 of 392
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. In the spirit of regional cooperation with regard to public safety matters, it
is in Roanoke County’s best interests to enter into a Second Antenna Site Use
Agreement and Ground Lease with the New River Valley 911 Authority for use of
property located at 8449 Honeysuckle Road.
2. The Second Antenna Site Use Agreement and Ground Lease with the
New River Valley 911 Authority for use of property located at 8449 Honeysuckle Road is
hereby approved with such completions, omissions, insertions, and changes as the
County Administrator or his designee may approve, whose approval shall be evidenced
conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof, all of which shall be approved as to
form by the County Attorney
3. The County Administrator or his designee is hereby authorized and
directed to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia in this matter as are necessary to accomplish
this ordinance, including the Second Antenna Site Use Agreement and Ground Lease,
which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney.
4. This ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption.
167 of 392
2
5
3
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Michael Galliher, Clerk of Court
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
All funds are provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia. No County matching funds are
required.
Staff Recommendation:
168 of 392
2
5
3
from the Commonwealth of Virginia for maintenance and other items in compliance of VA
Code Section 17.1-279.
169 of 392
2
5
6
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Jennifer Sexton, Business Coordinator
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
Acceptance of these funds has no negative fiscal impact. No local match is required.
Staff Recommendation:
170 of 392
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
B. Cameron Webb, MD, JD
State Health Commissioner Department of Health
Office of Emergency Medical Services
Maria Beermann-Foat, PhD, NRP 109 Governor Street 804-888-9100
Director Richmond, VA 23219 1-800-523-6019 (Va. only)
March 16, 2026
COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA
5204 Bernard Dr Roanoke VA 24018-4345
Dear City/County Administrator:
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED
Please return this report within 30 days
Your locality will be receiving the Fiscal Year 2026 "Four-For-Life" payment for Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) in the amount of $102,071.84 . These funds are for the collection period March 01, 2025 through February
28, 2026.
Guidelines for the use of these funds are attached and are available on our website:
http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/emergency-medical-services/return-to-locality/ . Prior to distribution of these funds
to the local government, this office must receive your Report of Expenditures on last year's distribution. The total
amount that must be reported for last year's distribution is annotated on the enclosed report.
The Four-For-Life program, as amended in 2000, stipulates that four additional dollars be charged and collected at
the time of registration of each passenger vehicle, pickup or panel truck. The funds collected, pursuant to Section
46.2-694, Code of Virginia, shall be used only for emergency medical services. The law further states that the
Department of Health shall return twenty-six percent (26%) of the registration fees collected to the locality wherein
such vehicle is registered to provide funding for:
1.Training of volunteer or salaried emergency medical service personnel of licensed, non-profit
emergency medical service agencies; or
2.The purchase of necessary equipment and supplies for licensed, non-profit emergency medical
service agencies.
It is important to recognize two clauses in the Four-For-Life legislation: (1) non-supplanting funds and (2) failure
to report the use of funds by any local governing body will result in funds being retained. The Assistant Attorney
General, at our request has offered the following interpretation for use of the funds. "Any funds received from
Section 46.2-694 by a non-state agency cannot be used to match any other funds derived from Section 46.2-694 by171 of 392
that same non-state agency" Simply put, funds returned to localities cannot be used as the matching share of any
grants offered using Four-For-Life funds.
"Each local governing body shall report to the Board of Health on the use of Four-For-Life funds, which were
returned to it. In any case in which the local governing body grants the funds to a regional emergency medical
council to be distributed to licensed, non-profit emergency medical and rescue services, the local governing body
shall remain responsible for the proper use of the funds. If, at the end of any fiscal year, a report on the use of
Four-For-Life funds for that year has not been received from a local governing body, any funds due to that local
governing body for the next fiscal year shall be retained until such time as the report has been submitted to the
board."
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the Office of Emergency
Medical Services at 804-888-9100.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Berg, MPA, NRP
172 of 392
2
5
4
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
173 of 392
2
5
4
scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 18, 2026.
174 of 392
11-8/2026
175 of 392
176 of 392
177 of 392
7
Community Development Planning & Zoning Division
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner,
the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application
in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic
study at any time, as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
Retail shop/Shopping center
Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
Regional public facilities
Educational/Recreational facilities
Religious assemblies
Hotel/Motel
Golf course
Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
Industrial site/Factory
Day care center
Bank
Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway
classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc)
For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is
more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
When required to evaluate access issues
Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.)
Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem
Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s)
Substantial departure from the Community Plan
Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of
the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty
(750) trips in an average day
Effective date: April 19, 2005
178 of 392
179 of 392
120 Eastshore Drive + Suite 300 + Glen Allen, VA 23059 + 804.548.4079 + www.networkbuilding.com
Sam Averna
Land Use Manager
Network Towers
120 Eastshore Drive, Suite 300
Glen Allen, VA 23059
May 22, 2026
Rebecca James, Zoning Administrator
Roanoke County Zoning Department
5204 Bernard Drive, Second Floor
Roanoke, VA 24018
RE: Special Use Permit Application for New Wireless Telecommunication Facility
Parcel Address: (911 Address TBD) Meacham Road, Salem, VA 24153
Parcel #: 063.04-03-18.00-0000 & 063.04-03-18.03-0000
Dear Ms. James:
The application filed on behalf of the applicant, Network Towers II, LLC., with respect to its proposed
telecommunications facility (monopole tower) on the above referenced property:
• Special Use Permit Application;
• Applicant narrative and associated filing materials
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (571) 340-5493.
Sincerely,
Sam Averna
Land Use and Asset Manager
Network Towers
180 of 392
Network Towers II, LLC.
Site Name: Harwick Dr
SPECIAL USE PERMIT – APPLICANT NARRATIVE
Request
Network Towers II, LLC. (the “Applicant”) proposes to construct and operate a 199-foot monopole telecommunications
tower on a 1.48 acre parcel located off Meachum Road, Salem, VA 24153 (“Property”). The Property is owned by RYT,
LLC. T-Mobile (“TMO”) has a need to maintain and improve coverage in this area and will be the anchor tenant on the
tower.
Design and Compatibility
The proposed tower will have an overall structure height of 199 feet (195 foot monopole with a 4 foot lightning rod),
which will accommodate TMO and at least three (3) other collocators. The overall lease area will be 60’ x 60’ and the
fenced compound will be 50’ x 50’. The tower and associated ground equipment will be compatible with the surrounding
area for the following reasons:
• The tower will be strategically sited as far back from the public right-of-way and adjacent properties as possible to
reduce visibility;
• The tower is strategically sites within existing mature wooded area to reduce visibility;
• The tower will be over 113’ away from Meacham Road;
• The tower will be over 240’ from the nearest offsite residential dwelling;
• The tower will be made of galvanized steel to match the backdrop of the sky, therefore, reducing visibility;
• The ground equipment will be enclosed by a security fence;
• The facility will be unmanned and will only be visited approximately once a month by technicians;
• The facility will not be lit and will not emit any odor, fumes or glare;
• The noises emitted from the ground equipment are not louder than normal residential HVAC equipment
Purpose of Tower
In today’s society, reliable wireless service is a necessity for residents, students, businesses and emergency personnel.
The proposed tower will provide the infrastructure needed for TMO, as well as multiple other wireless carriers, to expand
and improve their networks in this area of Roanoke County. This reliable wireless service will enhance and protect the
local economy and complement economic development by (1) providing citizens the opportunity to work and shop from
home (2) allowing students the ability to utilize the latest online educational opportunities while at home (3) helping
nearby businesses to be more effective and efficient in their everyday operations and (4) providing dependable wireless
service to citizens travelling and emergency services operating on roadways in the area. This tower will specifically
provide the latest wireless technologies to the following:
• Those living in the greater Lafayette and Riverside area;
• Those travelling on Interstate 81, Route 460, Twine Hollow Road, and surrounding neighborhood roads;
• Those working and visiting nearby businesses such as Western Virginia Regional Jail, Eastern Montgomery Park,
Roanoke Urban Fishing Club, Marvin Composites, and surrounding businesses;
181 of 392
• Those attending Big Hill Baptist Church, Gospel Baptist Church, and other surrounding places of worship;
• Emergency personnel operating in the area
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
The subject property is zoned I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District. In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
broadcasting towers are permitted in the I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District with an approved Special Use Permit
“SUP”. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are governed within the Zoning Ordinance, Section 30-87-8. Wireless
Communication Facility, Class 1, Class 2, Class 3. The applicable requirements in these sections are as follows:
§ 30-87-8. Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1, Class 2, Class 3.
Ordinance Section
Ordinance (verbatim):
(A) Intent. The intent of these regulations for wireless communication facilities is:
1. To encourage and promote the colocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county.
Project Response:
The applicant worked in conjunction with TMO RF engineers to find a rawland solution to the ongoing coverage gap.
Existing available structures do not provide the necessary height, coverage capability, or structural capacity to meet
service objectives. As a result, colocation on an existing structure would not resolve the identified coverage gap. The
nearest existing tower is located approximately one mile to the south, where TMO is already co-located. However, this
tower is not structurally capable of supporting the required TMO equipment upgrades or accommodating additional
carriers due to its structural limitations. As a result, the construction of a new tower is required to meet current and
future service and capacity needs.
The proposed 199‑foot monopole represents the minimum height necessary to provide adequate service and is being
designed to accommodate up to three (3) additional future collocators. By supporting multiple users on a single structure,
the project advances the ordinance goal of promoting colocation and minimizing the need for additional towers in the
area.
2. To encourage the location of wireless communication facilities in non-residential areas and minimize the total number
of towers and tower sites throughout the county.
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communication facility is located on an industrially zoned property within an established industrial
area, consistent with the ordinance objective to prioritize non‑residential locations. Siting the tower in this area
minimizes impacts on residential uses, and the proposed multi‑user monopole helps reduce the need for additional towers
elsewhere in the County.
182 of 392
3. To strongly encourage the joint use of new and existing wireless communication facilities, and use of the existing utility
transmission rights-of-way.
Project Response:
The applicant evaluated opportunities for joint use of existing wireless communication facilities and the use of existing
utility transmission rights‑of‑way. No existing facilities or structures within the service area were capable of
accommodating the proposed equipment at the height and location necessary to meet coverage objectives. Transmission
towers are viewed as a one-carrier solution and the nearest AEP transmission tower already has AT&T collocated on it.
The proposed monopole is designed to support future joint use by additional wireless providers where technically
feasible, which will promote colocation over time and reduce the need for additional towers in the surrounding area,
consistent with the ordinance intent.
4. To encourage wireless communication facilities to locate in areas where the adverse impact on the surrounding
community is minimal.
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communication facility is located and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding
community. By siting the tower within an established industrial area and incorporating a monopole design, the facility is
compatible with existing land uses and limits visual and operational impacts on nearby properties.
5. To encourage users of wireless communication facilities to locate, design, and configure them in a way that minimizes
their adverse visual impact, and makes them compatible with surrounding land uses, to the extent possible.
Project Response:
The proposed tower is strategically sited within a mature, wooded area of the property to minimize visibility. As noted in
the submitted photosimulations, the tower was only visible from 1 out of 9 locations further showing minimal adverse
visual impacts to the surrounding area.
6. To strongly encourage the use of monopoles and camouflage/stealth techniques for towers located in or near residential
areas.
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communications tower will be of a monopole design and is sited on an industrial zoned parcel. A
stealth or flush-mount antenna design does not provide the same functionality or effectiveness as a full antenna array.
Specifically, with a stealth or flush-mount design, only three antennas can be located at each rad center; therefore, each
carrier would likely need two rad centers to fit their needed antennas. This could limit the ability of future collocators to
reach their desired height and achieve their coverage objective and could result in more towers being needed in the same
area to achieve the same objective. Furthermore, a stealth or flush-mount design reduces antenna effectiveness by
limiting the ability to tilt antennas and install radio heads behind the antennas. To achieve TMO’s current and future
coverage objective, a full antenna array is required.
183 of 392
7. To expand and improve high-speed broadband access and cell phone service availability in unserved and underserved
areas; and to explore public-private partnerships to implement Roanoke County's Rural Broadband Initiative to bring
high-speed internet to homes without broadband access.
Project Response:
This area of Roanoke County currently experiences limitations in wireless coverage. The proposed wireless
communication facility is intended to address these gaps by expanding and improving cellular and broadband service
availability. The project will provide needed wireless infrastructure to support T‑Mobile and future wireless carriers,
thereby improving service reliability and capacity within this underserved area.
Ordinance Section
Ordinance (verbatim):
(B) Small cell facility.
1. Permitted by right. A small cell facility installed by a wireless service provider on an existing structure or the
installation or construction of a new structure not more than fifty (50) feet above ground level containing a small cell
facility shall be permitted by right.
2. Colocation. The wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider shall obtain permission from the owner of
the existing structure to colocate the small cell facility on the existing structure and to colocate the associated transmission
equipment on or proximate to the existing structure.
3. Permit requests. A wireless services provider or wireless infrastructure provider may submit up to thirty-five (35)
permit requests for small cell facilities on a single application.
4. Review process. The review process and approval or disapproval of an application for small cell facilities shall be in
accordance with section 15.2-2316.4 of the Code of Virginia.
5. Other facilities. Facilities that do not meet the criteria to be deemed a small cell facility are subject to the regulations for
wireless communication facility.
Project Response:
Not applicable. This application is for a new monopole wireless communications tower and facility.
Ordinance Section
Ordinance (verbatim):
(C) General standards for wireless communication facilities.
1. Height. The maximum height of any proposed wireless communication facility and associated antenna shall be made as
a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any wireless communication facility and antenna exceed one
hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest wireless communication facility and antenna
height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives.
184 of 392
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communication facility will consist of a 195‑foot monopole with an additional 4‑foot lightning rod,
resulting in a total height of 199 feet
2. Facility setbacks. The setback for any proposed wireless communication facility shall, at a minimum, conform to the
requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback
from the base of the wireless communication facility to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40)
percent of the height of the tower.
Project Response:
The tower will exceed all required setbacks. The following are the required and proposed setbacks:
Setback
Right Side
Left Side
Nearest 242.4’
Please note that the nearest setback of 83.5’ located to the eastern property line is under the same ownership of the parcel
which this proposed tower is located.
3. Building/structure setbacks. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other
building or structure associated with a wireless communication facility shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures
shall be located at a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line.
Project Response:
Duly noted. The proposed tower complies with this setback provision.
4. Number of towers. More than one (1) wireless communication facility shall be permitted on a lot provided all
applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements.
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communication facility will be the only tower located on the subject parcel.
5. Lighting. Wireless communication facilities shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such
lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. Security lighting, or a down-lighting design, may be installed on buildings
and structures associated with a wireless communication facility.
Project Response:
The proposed monopole tower will not require any lighting per FAA requirements. Please see submitted TOWAIR report
certifying this fact.
185 of 392
6. FAA review. Any proposed wireless communication facility within two (2) miles from any general or commercial
airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to
the appropriate regional office of the FAA.
Project Response:
As noted in the TOWAIR report, there are no airports located within 5 miles of the proposed wireless communications
tower and facility. Additionally, the facility will not exceed 2,000’ AMSL.
7. Zoning overlay districts. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with any additional requirements
established in the airport overlay district and the emergency communications overlay district.
Project Response:
Duly noted. The proposed wireless communications tower and facility is not located within airport overlay district or
emergency communications overlay district.
8. Colocation. Any wireless communication facility approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading to
accommodate additional providers.
Project Response:
T‑Mobile (TMO) will serve as the anchor tenant for the proposed wireless communication facility. The monopole has
been structurally designed to accommodate up to three (3) additional collocators, thereby supporting future shared use of
the facility and reducing the need for additional towers. Structural capacity for multiple users is documented in the
submitted Preliminary Engineering (PE) Design Letter.
9. Design. A monopole wireless communication facility design is recommended.
Project Response:
The proposed wireless communications tower will be of a monopole design.
10. Removal. The applicant and property owner agree to dismantle and remove the facility within ninety (90) days of
abandonment following notice by the County.
Project Response:
In the unlikely event that the wireless communication facility is decommissioned, the applicant, Network Towers II, LLC,
will be solely responsible for the dismantling and removal of the tower and all associated equipment in accordance with
County requirements.
11. Finish. A flat matte finish is recommended for wireless communication facilities.
Project Response:
This proposed monopole will be made of galvanized steel to match the backdrop of the sky.
12. Signs. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of or services offered by any business
associated with the broadcasting tower.
186 of 392
Project Response:
Duly noted. The only proposed signage is what is required by the FCC.
Ordinance Section
Ordinance (verbatim):
(D) Application requirements.
1. All potential applicants shall consult with County planning staff prior to submitting an application. During this
consultation the applicant shall present information on system objectives, coverage areas, and alternative sites considered.
Project Response:
The applicant conducted a pre-application meeting with County planning staff on 3/18/2026.
2. In addition to Section 30-19-2 requirements, applicants shall provide the following:
a. The location of all other proposed wireless communication facility sites considered and rejected, and reasons for
rejection.
Project Response:
The applicant evaluated alternative wireless communication facility sites within the coverage search area, including
existing towers in proximity to the proposed location. T‑Mobile (TMO) is already colocated on the nearest existing
towers, located 3.2 miles East and 3.8 miles West, which are operating at or near capacity and do not provide the
necessary height, location, or coverage geometry to address the identified service gap. As a result, additional colocation
on nearby facilities would not meet the project’s coverage objectives, and those sites were eliminated from further
consideration.
b. The location of all other possible co-location sites considered and rejected, and reasons for rejection.
Project Response:
The applicant evaluated alternative wireless communication facility sites within the coverage search area, including
existing towers in proximity to the proposed location. T‑Mobile (TMO) is already colocated on the nearest existing
towers, located 3.2 miles East and 3.8 miles West, which are operating at or near capacity and do not provide the
necessary height, location, or coverage geometry to address the identified service gap. Additionally, an existing tower
located approximately one mile to the south is not capable of accommodating planned TMO equipment upgrades or
supporting any additional co-locations due to structural limitations. As a result, additional colocation on nearby facilities
would not meet the project’s coverage objectives, and those sites were eliminated from further consideration.
c. Accurate photographic simulations showing the relationship of the facility to its surroundings.
Project Response:
Please see the submitted photosimulations taken on 3/25/2026 where only one (1) out of nine (9) locations where visible.
The applicant worked in conjunction with staff to determine the photosimulation locations.
d. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicant’s existing communication system.
187 of 392
Project Response:
This is the only wireless communication facility currently proposed by Network Towers II, LLC within Roanoke County.
As demonstrated on the submitted propagation maps, the proposed site will integrate with existing T‑Mobile (TMO)
facilities in the surrounding area and directly address an identified coverage gap. The facility will strengthen the overall
network by providing improved continuity and reliability of service between existing sites.
e. An on-site balloon test or comparable test demonstrating visual impact prior to the Planning Commission hearing.
Project Response:
The applicant acknowledges this requirement and will coordinate with County staff to satisfy all notification and
procedural requirements associated with conducting the required public balloon test.
f. Written verification that all required FAA submittals have been completed.
Project Response:
The applicant has conducted all necessary screens with the FAA and FCC. As noted in the submitted TOWAIR and Notice
Criteria reports, lighting and notification with the FAA is not required.
g. Payment of all required application and review fees.
Project Response:
Duly noted.
3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost
of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower.
Project Response:
Duly noted.
15.2-2232 Review
1. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose
found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
Please see the aforementioned § 30-87-8 compliance section.
2. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County
Community Plan.
The proposed wireless communications facility is consistent with the general guidelines and policies of the Roanoke
County Community Plan by supporting the County’s goals for infrastructure investment, public safety, and managed
growth. The Community Plan emphasizes the importance of reliable public and private infrastructure to support existing
development, economic activity, and quality of life for residents and businesses.
188 of 392
As demonstrated by the submitted propagation maps, the project addresses an identified gap in wireless coverage within
the area. The proposed facility will improve access to high-quality wireless communications services, which aligns with
the Community Plan’s objective of enhancing modern infrastructure systems necessary for commerce, emergency
response, and daily community needs.
The project has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding properties and public resources. The facility will not
require water or sewer service, will generate minimal traffic due to infrequent maintenance visits, and will not negatively
affect roads, schools, parks, or other public facilities. Its location and design are consistent with the Community Plan’s
policies encouraging the placement of utility and communications infrastructure in a manner that limits visual,
environmental, and land-use impacts.
In addition, the improved wireless service provided by the facility will support enhanced communication capabilities for
fire, rescue, and other emergency services, further advancing the Community Plan’s public safety objectives. For these
reasons, the proposed project is consistent with and supportive of the goals, guidelines, and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
3. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding
area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools,
parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The proposed wireless communications facility will enhance connectivity for surrounding properties and the broader
area. As demonstrated in the submitted propagation maps, the project area is currently affected by a coverage gap. The
installation of this facility will provide much-needed wireless service improvements for nearby businesses, residences,
and the general public within this portion of Roanoke County.
The facility will not adversely impact public services or facilities, including water and sewer infrastructure, roadways,
schools, parks and recreational facilities, or fire and rescue services. The proposed facility will not require water or
sewer connections. In addition, the site will be accessed infrequently, typically once or twice per month for routine
maintenance or in the event of a power outage—resulting in no measurable impact on local traffic or roadway
conditions.
Finally, the improved wireless coverage provided by the facility will enhance communication capabilities for fire and
rescue personnel, as well as other emergency services, thereby supporting public safety in the surrounding area.
Conclusion
This proposal meets or exceeds the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance regarding towers, meets the criteria for a Special
Use Permit, and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Community Plan.
The proposed Facility is necessary to support the public’s increased use of wireless devices for personal and business
communications as well as convenience and safety communications. The proposed Facility would benefit the general
welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County by improving wireless communications and broadband infrastructure in
compliance with good zoning practices.
189 of 392
190 of 392
191 of 392
192 of 392
193 of 392
194 of 392
195 of 392
196 of 392
197 of 392
198 of 392
199 of 392
8601 Six Forks Road + Suite 540 + Raleigh, NC 27615 + 919.657.9131 + www.networkbuilding.com
Oscar Posada April 14, 2026
Network Towers II, LLC
3095 Marshalee Drive, Suite 300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Subject: Certification of Code Compliance for Proposed Telecommunications Tower
NB+C Project No. 100772
Dear Oscar Posada,
NB+C Engineering Services, LLC (NB+C) is pleased to submit this certification letter outlining the approximate
geometry and design parameters for a proposed telecommunications structure. It is our understanding that Network
Towers II, LLC intends to build a new wireless telecommunications facility at the below-mentioned site to include a
new monopole tower and fenced compound as defined in the preliminary zoning drawings by NB+C dated March 31,
2026.
This letter certifies that the tower will be designed and manufactured to meet all structural requirements and safety
specifications outlined in the codes and standards listed below as well as local code requirements. Please see below
for tower site information, approximate geometry, design parameters, and design loading summary:
Tower Site Information
Tower Owner: Network Towers II
Site Name: Harwick Dr
Site ID: VA-T22.27
Lat: 37° 15’ 16.26” N
Long: 80° 11’ 28.40” W
Address: Meacham Road, Salem, Roanoke County, VA, 24153
Approximate Monopole Tower Geometry
Tower Height: 195 ft
Base Diameter: 6 ft
Anchor Rod Diameter: 2-1/4”
Foundation Type: Drilled Shaft or Pad-Pier/Single Mat
# of Design Carriers: 4
200 of 392
201 of 392
FCC Home | Search | Updates | E-Filing | Initiatives | For Consumers | Find People
Antenna Structure Registration
FCC > WTB > A R > Online ystems > TOWAIR FCC ite Map
TOWAIR Determination Results
New Search Printable Page
*** NOTICE ***
TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are
fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of
the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR
recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR
recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR
participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR
is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further
investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate.
DETERMINATION Results
Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5
miles) of the coordinates you provided.
Your Specifications
NAD83 Coordinates
Latitude 37-15-16.2 north
Longitude 080-11-28.3 west
Measurements (Meters)
Overall Structure Height (AGL)60.7
Support Structure Height (AGL)59.4
Site Elevation (AMSL)436.8
Structure Type
MTOWER - Monopole
Tower Construction Notifications
Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower.
ASR Help FAQ Online Help Documentation Technical Support
ASR Online Systems TOWAIR CORES ASR Online Filing Application Search Registration Search
About ASR Privacy Statement About ASR ASR Home
FCC | Wireless | ULS | CORES Help | Tech Support
Federal Communications Commission
45 L Street NE
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 1-877-480-3201
ASL Videophone:1 844 432 2275
Submit Help Request
4/27/26, 3:48 PM TOWAIR Search Results
https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/towairResult.jsp 1/1
202 of 392
203 of 392
204 of 392
205 of 392
206 of 392
207 of 392
208 of 392
209 of 392
210 of 392
211 of 392
212 of 392
213 of 392
Meacham Road (Tax Parcel #: 063.04-03-18.00-0000 and 063.04-03-18.03-0000)
Aerial Map
Vantor, Roanoke County
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.07 0.130.03 km
1:3,164
214 of 392
I2C
AG3
AR
AR
I1
AR
AVS
AR
AG3
Meacham Road (Tax Parcel #: 063.04-03-18.00-0000 and 063.04-03-18.03-0000)
Zoning Map
Roanoke County
AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District
AR, Agricultural/Residential District
AV, Agricultural/Village Center District
I-1, Low Intensity Industrial District
I-2, High Intensity Industrial District
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.07 0.130.03 km
1:3,164Zoning
215 of 392
RP
RV
PI
Meacham Road (Tax Parcel #: 063.04-03-18.00-0000 and 063.04-03-18.03-0000) -
Future Land Use Map
Roanoke County
Rural Preserve
Rural Village
Principal Industrial
0 0.04 0.080.02 mi
0 0.07 0.130.03 km
1:3,164Future Land Use
216 of 392
2
6
3
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
217 of 392
2
6
3
1.That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this ordinance for the purpose of
scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 18, 2026.
218 of 392
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Date received: (;, 12-z.-',
Received by:
Placards issued: BOS date:
(540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 CaseNumber 'z_ -€ · ()2,_G,
ALL APPLICANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
)(Rezoning o Special Use o Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review
Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540-772-2069
Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County Cell#:
PO Box 29800 Email: econciev@roanolcecountyva.gov
Roanoke, VA 24018 Contact for Legal Ads Me&an Baker
Owner's name/address w/zip Phone#: {540) 556-3389 J &K HTCC LLP Cell#: 418 First Street Email: lkitchens@el1tefiomerentals.net
Roanoke, VA 24011
Property Location Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
2222 Electric Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 Windsor Hills Community Planning area:
Tax Map No.: 076.07-02-50.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C-2C
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1.36 Acres Existing Land Use: Office space
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2212) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP)
Proposed Zoning: C-2; Removal of proffered conditons
Proposed Land Use: Office space
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes p( No L IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST (Rezoning).
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Article IV (Special Use Permit)? YesX No L
IF NO, AV ARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes._ NOL
VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA)
Variance/Waiver ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal oflnterpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the apphcatton complete? Please check 1f enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA
Con sultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan
�
Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property 01· the o r's agent or conlract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and
consent f the owner. 2 219 of 392
3
Applicant Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW
REQUESTS
See Attached
See Attached
See Attached
220 of 392
PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND
This project involves the removal of proffered conditions from a commercial property in the
Oak Grove Area. The property (TM#076.07-02-50.00-0000) was rezoned in September of
1983 from R-3 to B-2 for office use (applicant and other businesses). As part of the
rezoning, the property owner proffered to exclude numerous uses from the property
including certain commercial uses, parking lots, public and nonprofit organization uses,
funeral homes, public amusement uses, public utilities, and animal hospitals and clinics.
The property was developed in accordance with the proffered conditions and has been
used for office space for over 40 years.
With only 4%-5% of Roanoke County being zoned for industrial or commercial
development, the removal of old and outdated proffered conditions is necessary to provide
for new development and redevelopment opportunities in the future. This strategy is
included in the Board of Supervisors Strategic Plan and the Roanoke County 200 Plan.
NEED & JUSTIFICATION QUESTIONS
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning
district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed request furthers the general purpose statement in the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance to “Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable
employment and enlarge the tax base.” The proposed request also furthers the purpose of
the C-2 High Intensity Commercial district which is:
• “to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities
within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or
large areas of the county.”
• “High intensity commercial districts are most appropriately found along major
arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population.”
• “The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses.”
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies
contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed project complies with the following items in the County’s Comprehensive
Plan:
The Roanoke County 200 Plan includes the following Economic Development goal and
objectives:
221 of 392
Economic Development: Roanoke County recognizes that a strong economy
benefits from partnering with current and potential businesses, cultivating a skilled
workforce, and fostering connectivity to the world.
• Encourage the reuse, redevelopment and occupancy of existing, vacant
commercial and industrial space.
• Provide resources and support to help retain and expand existing businesses.
• Seek new business development and investment in the County.
The Oak Grove Center Plan (2021), which is part of the Roanoke County 200 Plan, also
includes the following:
Principle/Core Concept/Supporting Initiative:
Principle: Create a place where people and businesses want to be.
Core Concept: Encourage mixed-use development and a vibrant mix of businesses
in a pedestrian-friendly environment.
Supporting Initiative: Evaluate development ordinances in order to support desired
land uses and development patterns.
Land Use Recommendation
Target key sites for future economic development opportunities.
• Roanoke County and Roanoke City will continue to work with private property
and business owners to identify and support development or redevelopment
of potential catalyst sites.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan also includes the following Land Use & Housing
recommendation:
• Remove outdated proffer conditions on certain properties to promote
redevelopment and expedite the development process.
Lastly, the future land use designation for this property in the Roanoke County Plan 200 is
Transition. Transition is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of
highway frontage parcels. Appropriate land use types include office and institutional uses,
retail, multi-family residential, single family attached residential, and parks.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining
properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and
facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The request to remove the proffered conditions from the property at 2222 Electric Road will
have minimal impact on the property and surrounding properties. The property is zoned C-
222 of 392
2 High Intensity Commercial and is currently used for general office use. Removal of the
proffered conditions would allow for future by-right commercial uses in C-2 which would
be compatible with surrounding uses. Surrounding uses include commercial and
townhouse condominiums to the north, multi-family residential to the east, commercial
and office use to the south, and residential uses across Route 419 to the west. Electric
Road (Route 419) contains a variety of commercial, office, civic, and residential uses
adjacent to it in the Oak Grove area.
The removal of the proffered conditions on this existing commercially developed site will
have no or minimal impact on public services (schools, parks and recreation, police and
fire and rescue). The property is currently adequately served by public water and public
sewer. The property is located along Electric Road, which is a four-lane divided highway at
the entrance to the property. Access to the property is a right-in/right-out due to the
divided highway. Any new uses or redevelopment of the property would be adequately
served by the existing roadway infrastructure and VDOT would review entrance permits for
any new uses or redevelopment of the site.
223 of 392
6/12/26
224 of 392
7
Community Development Planning & Zoning Division
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner,
the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application
in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic
study at any time, as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
Retail shop/Shopping center
Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
Regional public facilities
Educational/Recreational facilities
Religious assemblies
Hotel/Motel
Golf course
Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
Industrial site/Factory
Day care center
Bank
Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway
classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc)
For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is
more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
When required to evaluate access issues
Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.)
Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem
Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s)
Substantial departure from the Community Plan
Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of
the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty
(750) trips in an average day
Effective date: April 19, 2005
225 of 392
6/12/26
226 of 392
2222 Electric Road
Vantor, Roanoke County
6/12/2026, 4:16:15 PM
0 0.1 0.20.05 mi
0 0.15 0.30.07 km
1:8,492
227 of 392
2222 Electric Road
Maxar, Microsoft, Roanoke County, VA 2023, Roanoke County
9/12/2025, 2:11:36 PM
0 0.03 0.050.01 mi
0 0.04 0.070.02 km
1:1,834
228 of 392
Cave Spring, Virginia
Google Street View
Oct 2024 See more dates
2222 VA-419
229 of 392
230 of 392
231 of 392
232 of 392
233 of 392
Adjacent Property Owners
1
North of the Property
2772 Electric Road, Suite 1
2772 Electric Road, Suite 1 (Convenience Store)
Condominium Unti Owners
4730 Glen Heather Circle
Nichols
4721 Glen Heather Circle
Ruby Ratliff
4725 Glen Heather Circle
1106 Smith Street
4733 Glen Heather Circle
4737 Glen Heather Circle
234 of 392
Adjacent Property Owners
2
4745 Glen Heather Circle
East of the Property
Pines Owner 2, LLC
92 River Road
Summit, NJ 07901
(Apartments)
South of the Property
418 First Street
418 First Street
Roanoke, VA 24011
Parking
Credit Union
PO Box 12288
West of the Property (Across Electric Road)
1510 Innsbrooke Drive
4818 Grandin Road
2222 Tannehill Drive
235 of 392
Adjacent Property Owners
3
4818 Grandin Road
236 of 392
Aerial Map 2222 Electric Road
Vantor, Roanoke County
6/22/2026, 2:15:12 PM
0 0.01 0.030.01 mi
0 0.03 0.050.01 km
1:1,311
237 of 392
R1
C1C
C2
R3
R3
R3
R1
R3R3
R1
R1
C2C
C2
C2C
R3
R1
R1
C2
R3
R3
Zoning Map 2222 Electric Road
Roanoke County
Zoning
C1
C2
C2
R1
R3
6/22/2026, 2:17:01 PM
0 0.01 0.030.01 mi
0 0.03 0.050.01 km
1:1,311
238 of 392
NC
TR
FLU Map 2222 Electric Road
Roanoke County
Roanoke County Future Land Use
Neighborhood Conservation
Transition
6/22/2026, 2:18:15 PM
0 0.01 0.030.01 mi
0 0.03 0.050.01 km
1:1,311
239 of 392
1
9
3
ACTION NO. _____________
ITEM NO.__________
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept New
Pleasant Way in the Catawba Magisterial District into the VDOT Secondary Road System.
Submitted By: Tarek Moneir, Director of Development Services
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to accept New
Pleasant Way in the Catawba Magisterial District into the VDOT Secondary Road System.
Background:
The County of Roanoke is requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution
asking the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accept, as described by the AM-
4.3, (See attachment A) 0.21 mile of New Pleasant Way from the intersection with Pleasant
Run Drive (VA SEC. Route # 796) to the end of its cul-de-sac. This road is located within the
Point Pleasant subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District.
Discussion:
The staff have inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of
Transportation and find the road acceptable.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
The staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolution to VDOT requesting
that they accept New Pleasant Way into the Secondary Road System.
240 of 392
Description Length ROW Services
New Pleasant Way; From: Int 796 To: End of its cul -de-sac 0.21 mi 50 ft 20/20 houses
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ACCEPTANCE OF NEW PLEASANT WAY INTO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY SYSTEM
Exhibit “A”
241 of 392
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Form AM 4.3
Form AM 4.3
(Rev 05/28/2026)
by Resolution of the governing body adopted 7/14/2026
In Roanoke County
ICR ID: 43701810
SSAR
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
CHANGE TYPE RTE NUM &
STREET NAME
CHANGE
DESCRIPTION
FROM TERMINI TO TERMINI LENGTH NUMBER OF
LANES
RECORDAT
ION
REFERENC
E
ROW
WIDTH
Addition Rt. 812 - New
Pleasant Way
New subdivision
street §33.2-705
Intersection w/
private road
End of cul-de-sac 0.1760 2 50
Addition Rt. 812 - New
Pleasant Way
New subdivision
street §33.2-705
Intersection with
Pleasant Run
Drive, Route 796
Intersection with
private road
0.0340 2 50
The following VDOT Form AM-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for changes to the
secondary system of state highways.
A Copy Testee Signed (County Official):__________________________________________________________
Project/Subdivision: New Pleasant Way Street Acceptance
242 of 392
2
5
0
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF NEW PLEASANT WAY
IN THE POINT PLEASANT SUBDIVISION IN THE CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (“VDOT”) SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE
HIGHWAYS
243 of 392
2
5
0
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded
to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia guarantees the performance of the street(s) requested herein to become part of
the Secondary System of State Highways for a period of one year from the date of the
acceptance of the referenced street(s) by the Virginia Department of Transportation into
the Secondary System of State Highways. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia will completely reimburse all costs incurred by the Virginia Department of
Transportation to repair any faults in the workmanship or materials of the referenced
street(s) and related drainage facilities as determined exclusively by the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
244 of 392
2
7
1
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Michael Poindexter, Chief of Police
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
The total amount of the grant awarded is $89,999.98, with 46.14% funded by federal
funds and 53.86% provided as matching funds by the Police Department. The required
match will come from the general fund operating budget which has already been
appropriated.
Staff Recommendation:
245 of 392
2
7
1
Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to fiscal year 2026 in the
amount of $41,527.87 to the Roanoke County Police Department from the U.S.
Department of Justice’s Bulletproof Vest Partnership.
246 of 392
247 of 392
2
7
0
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Michael Poindexter, Chief of Police
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
Awarded State funds total $328,811. This award requires a local match of up to
$174,885. This match funding will come from the general fund operating budget which
has already been appropriated. All funds needed to cover the costs for the School
Resource Officers will be deposited within the grant fund.
Staff Recommendation:
248 of 392
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2026
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $328,811 FROM
THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
(DCJS) AND APPROPRIATING SUCH FUNDS FOR USE BY THE
ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR EIGHT SCHOOL
RESOURCE OFFICERS
249 of 392
2. That the sum of $174,885, having already been appropriated in the general
fund, is hereby transferred to the County’s grant fund for the matching
requirement of the salaries and benefits of eight school resource officers.
3. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
250 of 392
May 29, 2026
Mr. Richard Caywood
County Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke,Virginia 24018
RE: 567166-FY27 - School Resource Officer Continuation Grants - SRO
Dear Mr. Richard Caywood:
We are pleased to inform you that your organization has been awarded a grant under the funding opportunity listed
above. Your DCJS grant award number is 27-421-D and was approved for a total budget of $503,696, through state
funding. The project period is 7/1/2026 through 6/30/2027.
Included with this letter is your Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA), Special Conditions, Reporting
Requirements, and Projected Due Dates. Please review these materials carefully. In addition, there may
be Encumbrances, action items related to your grant award, that require your immediate attention. If applicable, these
must be addressed and submitted through the On-line Grants Management System (OGMS) at
https://ogms.dcjs.virginia.gov.
We are committed to supporting you throughout the life of your grant and are available to assist in any way to help
ensure your project’s success. To formally accept the award and its conditions, please sign the enclosed Statement of
Grant Award/Acceptance (SOGA) and return it electronically within 60 days to grantsmgmt@dcjs.virginia.gov. If you
have questions, contact your DCJS Grant Monitor Jordy Nolan at (804) 845-1156 or via email at
jordy.nolan@dcjs.virginia.gov.
Sincerely,
Ashaki McNeil
Director
251 of 392
STATEMENT OF GRANT AWARD (SOGA)
Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services
1100 Bank Street, 12th Floor
Richmond, VA 23219
567166-FY27 - School Resource Officer Continuation Grants - SRO
Please note grant awards are contingent on the availability of funding.
Roanoke, County 27-421-D
GX4HPU2KPHE3
7/1/2026 6/30/2027
Mr. Patrick Pascoe
Commander
5925 Cove Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
540-777-5258
ppascoe@roanokecountyva.gov
County Administrator
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
540-776-7190
rcaywood@roanokecountyva.gov
Financial Analyst
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
540-283-8137
jpegram@roanokecountyva.gov
*If applicable, please indicate your Indirect Cost Rate in the space provided and attach written documentation if not using the de minimis.
As the duly authorized representative, the undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Awards (SOGA) and reviewing the
Special Conditions, hereby accepts this grant and agrees to the conditions and provisions of all other Federal and State laws and rules
and regulations that apply to this award. If there has been a change in an authorized official, cross out the information on the
document and write the new contact information. Do not electronically alter this document.
Authorized Official (Project Administrator)
252 of 392
2
7
5
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Chad Beheler, Deputy Sheriff Lieutenant Colonel
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
The total amount of the grant awarded is $6,431.40, with 46.14% funded by federal
funds and 53.86% provided as matching funds by the Sheriff’s Office. The required
match will come from the general fund operating budget which has already been
appropriated. Acceptance of this grant will allow the Sheriff's Office to offset a portion of
the cost associated with the purchase of ballistic vests for sworn personnel while
meeting the program's local match requirement.
Staff Recommendation:
253 of 392
2
7
5
Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to fiscal year 2026 in the
amount of $2,967.59 to the Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office from the U.S. Department of
Justice’s Bulletproof Vest Partnership.
254 of 392
!"##$ ##" %& '' *+),- .,)/0-12) 3,304 .,)/-*053 *3,6()*7*-*09:9;=
9:9;?@?A9;:BB:CD EFF
G?HI J9KDLC;D JLKBM5/O5+(2)P253,+2QBLNBR7O),3O*5&,32Q :TUMNU9:9T%&VWVXY YZVXW[[W\]#" "^!" 54,P3O*5 _72 "5`*OP20-12) &,32 -*0E
I
= :;U:TU9:9L J9KDLCb? cdEecbf :;UNBU9:9L J9KDLC--2534QE
<
:;UNBU9:9L.,)/Y,6,5P2 gVh]i\--2534Q
255 of 392
1
7
8
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with such a referral to the Planning Commision.
Staff Recommendation:
256 of 392
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION TO STUDY AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING WHETHER TO AMEND OR REPEAL THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 30-58 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING
ORDINANCE, WHICH SECTION ESTABLISHES THE CLEARBROOK
VILLAGE OVERLAY DISTRICT
257 of 392
2
7
9
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Elijah Daly, Director of Human Resources
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
258 of 392
2
7
9
Independence Day
Monday, July 5 (observed)
Labor Day
Monday, September 6
Veteran's Day
Thursday, November 11
Day Before Thanksgiving
Wednesday November 24, Half Day- Offices Close at Noon
Thanksgiving Day
Thursday, November 25
Day After Thanksgiving
Friday, November 26
Christmas Eve
Thursday, December 23 (observed)
Christmas Day
Friday, December 24 (observed)
Fiscal Impact:
No new/additional fiscal impact projected.
Staff Recommendation:
259 of 392
Capital
Unappropriated % of Board Expenditure
Balance Revenues Contingency Contingency Reserves
Unaudited balance as of June 30, 2026 32,662,977$ -$ -$ 458,967$
Approved Sources:
Appropriated from 2026-27 budget (Ordinance 052626-5) - 50,000 712,779 2,486,832
Approved Uses:
Appropriated from 2026-27 budget (Ordinance 052626-5) - - - (2,811,832)
- - -
Balance at July 14, 2026 32,662,977$ 11.5% 50,000$ 712,779$ 133,967$
County of Roanoke
Unappropriated Balance, Board Contingency, and Capital Reserves
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
General Government
260 of 392
Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows:
Unaudited
Outstanding Outstanding
June 30, 2026 Additions Deletions July 14, 2026
Debt type:
VPSA School Bonds 102,294,832$ -$ 9,363,672$ 92,931,160$
Lease Revenue Bonds 87,840,000 - - 87,840,000
Temporary Literary Loans*71,393,192 - - 71,393,192
Subtotal 261,528,024 - 9,363,672 252,164,352
Premiums 13,883,525 - - 13,883,525
275,411,549$ -$ 9,363,672$ 266,047,877$
Summary by entity:
County 93,970,528$ -$ -$ 93,970,528$ 35.32%
Schools 181,441,021 - 9,363,672 172,077,349 64.68%
100.00%
* The County has been approved for $75 million in Literary Loans. This amount will not be turned into permanent
loans until all monies are drawn down for the three school projects approved for funding which are:
Glen Cove and W.E. Cundiff Elementary Schools and the Roanoke County Career and Technology Center
Submitted By Laurie L. Gearheart
Chief Financial Officer
Approved By Richard L. Caywood
County Administrator
261 of 392
ACTION NO. _______________
ITEM NO. __________________
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 14, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid – June 2026
SUBMITTED BY: Laurie L. Gearheart
Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED BY: Richard L. Caywood
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit Checks Total
Payments to Vendors -$ -$ 14,191,822.30$
Payroll 06/05/26 2,120,890.73 17,218.40 2,138,109.13
Payroll 06/18/26 3,635,914.03 16,243.11 3,652,157.14
Manual Checks - - -
Grand Total 19,982,088.57$
A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
262 of 392
1
7
8
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Peter S. Lubeck, County Attorney
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
Staff Recommendation:
263 of 392
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies; and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
264 of 392
2
5
5
ACTION NO. _____________
Meeting Date: July 14, 2026
Agenda Item:
Submitted By: Philip Thompson, Director of Planning
Approved By: Richard L. Caywood, County Administrator
Issue:
Background:
.
Discussion:
265 of 392
2
5
5
The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the special use permit in an
AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, with the following conditions:
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Staff Recommendation:
266 of 392
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Travis Bell
Request: To obtain a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel on approximately
3.64 acres of land zoned AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District
Location:
Tax Parcel:
6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road
# 096.04-04-29.00-0000 and 096.04-04-28.00-0000
Proposed
Conditions:
1. The maximum number of dogs onsite shall be limited to twelve (12) between
the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
2. The maximum number of dogs onsite overnight (after 6:00 p.m. and before
7:30 a.m. the following day) shall be limited to two (2).
3. The setbacks of all outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens
associated with a commercial kennel shall be in substantial conformance
with the “Setback Map” submitted by the applicant.
Travis Bell is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel on approximately 3.64 acres
of land zoned AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, located at 6754 Grubb Road (tax parcel #096.04-04-
29.00-0000) ,and 0 Grubb Road (tax parcel #096.04-04-28.00-0000) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject properties as Rural Village.
Rural Village is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions are generally
stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestal, recreational, and remote rural
residential areas. Appropriate land use types include rural housing, rural community centers, agricultural production
and services, forest and wood products, small scale commercial, and rural parks and outdoor recreation. The
proposed special use permit is consistent with the Rural Village future land use designation.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines kennel, commercial as “the boarding, breeding, raising,
grooming or training of two (2) or more dogs, cats, or other household pets of any age not owned by the
owner or occupant of the premises for commercial gain.” Kennel, commercial requires a special use permit
in the AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District. Section 30-85-18 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance, amended May 26th, 2026, contains the following use and design standards for kennel,
commercial:
(A) General Standards:
1. Each commercial kennel shall install and operate a kennel silencer.
2. Animal waste shall [be] disposed of in a manner acceptable to the department of health.
3. Crematoria or land burial of animals in association with a commercial kennel shall be prohibited.
267 of 392
1. The minimum area required for a commercial kennel shall be two (2) acres.
2. All outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated with a commercial kennel
shall be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any property line. The 100-foot setback
may be reduced by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors during the special use
permit process.
3. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall
be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background – The existing site is comprised of two parcels, the first parcel, 6754 Grubb Road is
approximately two (2) acres and contains a single-family residence and three (3) accessory structures. The
second parcel is approximately 1.64 acre and is vacant and wooded. Roanoke County Real Estate records
indicate the single-family dwelling was built in 1920. The current property owners purchased the property in
December of 2019. In December of 2025, the property owners approached Roanoke County Planning staff
regarding the process for obtaining a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel. It was determined
that under the existing use and design standards for a commercial kennel, the existing structures and
fenced in area would not be able to be associated with the proposed commercial kennel. The Board of
Supervisors approved an amendment to the zoning ordinance in May of 2026. Among other changes, the
updated use and design standards for commercial kennel allow the minimum one hundred (100) foot
setback from any property line for outdoor runs, outdoor training areas, and outdoor pens associated with a
commercial kennel to be reduced by either the zoning administrator or the Planning Commission and the
Board of Supervisors depending on whether the use type requires a special use permit in the zoning district
it is located in. After being made aware of this proposed amendment, the applicant submitted a special use
permit request in March of 2026.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 2nd, 2026, on the original special use permit
request. The original request only included the parcel addressed 6754 Grubb Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the special use permit request at the June 2nd public hearing. There
were concerns raised about whether the parcel addressed 6754 Grubb Road was two (2) acres and would
comply with the use and design standards for commercial kennels. The deeded acreage of 6754 Grubb
Road is two (2) acres, however a plat that was done more recently but has not been recorded was
submitted with the special use permit application that shows the parcel as 1.984 acre. This led to the
submittal of a revised application that includes both 6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road to bring the
acreage total to approximately 3.64 acres and eliminate any issues when applying for a commercial kennel
license if the special use permit request were approved.
single-family dwelling towards the publicly maintained portion of Grubb Road with an elevation change of
approximately 22 feet. There are large shrubs that line both sides of the driveway before it reaches the
single-family dwelling. There is a stream that runs from Grubb Road to the southwest, the area beyond this
stream the southeast of the single-family dwelling is wooded. The driveway continues into another wooded
area in the northwest corner of the property. To the west of the single family dwelling there is a large grassy
area with several scattered trees. The southern property line of 6754 Grubb Road is entirely wooded with a
second concentration of trees at the southwestern corner. There is a second stream that runs from Grubb
Road to the southwest along the northern property line of 6754 Grubb Road. The wooded areas in the
southwest and northwest corners of 6754 Grubb Road property are connected to 0 Grubb Road, the parcel
directly to the west that is also included in this petition and is entirely wooded. There is an elevation change
268 of 392
property line of 6754 Grubb Road. From the western property line of 6754 Grubb Road to the western
property line of 0 Grubb Road, the property continues to slope upward and there is an elevation change of
approximately 35 feet.
The property is zoned AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District and is entirely surrounded to the north,
south, east, and west by property zoned AG-1. The surrounding properties are primarily properties that are
greater than 1 acre in size and contain single-family residences. There are also several vacant parcels in
the vicinity. The Blue Ridge Parkway is approximately half a mile north of the subject property. To the east
and south of the subject property are several small subdivisions zoned AR, Agricultural/Residential District.
These include Cotton Hill, Cotton Hill Estates, and Mason Knob Estates.
Screening & Buffering – A Type C buffer yard would be required at all property lines where the subject
property would adjoin properties that contain residential use types. Per Section 30-92-6(A) of the Roanoke
County Zoning Ordinance, a Type C buffer yard must take one of the following two forms:
Option 1 (Large Buffer, Minimal Landscaping)
40′ buffer
For every 100′ consisting of:
• One row of large evergreen trees (5)
• One row of small deciduous trees (6)
• One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18)
• One row of large deciduous shrubs (22-24)
Option 2 (Smaller Buffer With More Landscaping/Screening)
30′ buffer
For every 100′ consisting of:
• One row of large deciduous trees (3)
• One row of large evergreen shrubs (16-18)
• One row of large deciduous shrubs (22—24)
• 6′ screening
Community Outreach – As part of the original request, approximately 15 letters were mailed to adjoining
property owners and tenants which contained the request, information about the subject parcel, instructions
for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. Staff received six (6) written comments from
citizens with concerns about this petition, these are attached to this report.
Fifteen (15) citizens spoke at the June 2nd Planning Commission public hearing. All speakers spoke in
opposition to the special use permit request. They raised concerns about inaccurate information in the
application, inconsistency with the Rural Village Future Land Use Designation due to lack of local need, lack
of answers to questions on the application including the insufficient addressing of impacts on adjoining
properties, the applications reference to scalability and growth, more suitable commercial locations existing
for a commercial kennel, the petition not being aligned with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance’s
purpose statement due to unique land resources not being protected, the notification process, and the
geographical location of those who signed the neighborhood support survey. Concerns also included limited
access to the neighborhood on the residential road, traffic on the one and a half lane road especially during
pick up and drop off, inability to walk on the road, maintenance of the road, privacy and safety, and missing 269 of 392
application and staff report said will be permitted and the number of dogs that Travis Bell has already been
providing services to, it was alleged that the commercial kennel has been in operation for over two (2) years.
This led to concerns that inspections of the commercial kennel have not been done and the possibility that
there are unpaid taxes from the business. The most prominent concerns included noise and the density of
trees and the ability of the trees to abate the noise, property value drops of 5-15% due to perceived
nuisance, and public health due to drainage of fecal material into waterways and soil and the introduction of
antibiotics and bacteria into well water. There was an issue raised about the discrepancy between the
survey provided by the applicant that shows the property as less than two (2) acres and the application
which states that the property is two (2) acres.
Following the submittal of the revised application after the June 2nd public hearing, approximately 34 letters
were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants and citizens who spoke at the June 2nd Planning
Commission public hearing. These letters contained the new request, information about the subject parcel,
instructions for how to submit comments and contact information for staff. No additional comments have
been received by staff since these letters were mailed.
3.ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture – The submitted concept plan shows the existing single-family dwelling and three
(3) existing accessory structures. There are no proposed changes to the site. The existing single-family
dwelling and the detached garage to the west of the single-family dwelling are proposed to be used in
conjunction with the commercial kennel. There is a fenced area that connects these two (2) structures which
would also be used as part of the commercial kennel. The setback map shows the distances from the
outdoor area and the structures to be used as a part of the commercial kennel to adjacent property lines.
The outdoor area is approximately 46 feet from the northern property line and approximately 90 feet from
the southwestern property line. The commercial kennel is proposed to offer overnight boarding, doggie
daycare, and grooming. The boarding is proposed to have a daily average of two (2) dogs participating per
day, these dogs will occupy two suites that are approximately 275 square feet and are located in the single-
family dwelling. The doggie daycare is proposed to have a daily average of five (5) to ten (10) dogs
participating per day. These dogs would occupy the approximately 1,800 square foot outdoor area and the
240 square foot detached garage. The grooming aspect is proposed to include a weekly average of three (3)
baths and a weekly average of three (3) nail trimmings. The office hours are proposed to be 7:30 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. The drop off for doggie daycare is proposed to be 7:30 a.m. to 9:00
a.m. Monday through Saturday and the pickup is proposed to be 4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. The boarding is proposed to have the same drop-off and pickup hours as doggie daycare with an
additional pick up option for 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sunday. The applicant has indicated that there will be
24/7 on-site supervision.
Access/Traffic Circulation – The subject property is located at the end of the publicly maintained portion of a
residential street, Grubb Road. Access to the site continues as the paved driveway of 6754 Grubb Road.
Beyond the single-family dwelling, the easement is gravel and provides access to 0 Grubb Road, the vacant
property to the west that is included in this petition, and 5788 Grubb Road which contains a single-family
dwelling. The publicly maintained portion of Grubb Road becomes Sugar Rum Ridge Road, a private road,
Agencies Comments: The following agencies provided comments on this application:
Office of Building Safety – Any construction on site will need to meet the requirements of the Virginia
Uniform Statewide Building Code.
270 of 392
Fire and Rescue – Fire and Rescue does not object to this project and it will not increase the services we
provide.
VDOT – It appears that this parcel is located along the private section of Grubb Road. Therefore, VDOT
comments on this SUP request are not required. Please see the attached Google Earth image
and image from VDOT's land use web app showing that it's located past the end of state maintenance.
(attached)
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Roanoke County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject property as Rural
Village. Rural Village is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions
are generally stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestal, recreational,
and remote rural residential areas. Appropriate land use types include rural housing, rural community
centers, agricultural production and services, forest and wood products, small scale commercial, and rural
parks and outdoor recreation. The proposed special use permit is consistent with the Rural Village future
land use designation.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
Travis Bell is petitioning to obtain a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel on approximately
3.64 acres of land zoned AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, located at 6754 Grubb Road and 0
Grubb Road (tax parcel #096.04-04-28.00-0000) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The Roanoke
County 200 Plan indicates the future land use designation of the subject property as Rural Village. The
proposed special use permit is consistent with the Rural Village future land use designation.
If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit for a commercial kennel, staff
suggest the following conditions:
1. The maximum number of dogs onsite shall be limited to twelve (12) between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and
6:00 p.m.
2. The maximum number of dogs onsite overnight (after 6:00 p.m. and before 7:30 a.m. the following day)
shall be limited to two (2).
3. The setbacks of all outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated with a commercial
kennel shall be in substantial conformance with the “Setback Map” submitted by the applicant.
CASE NUMBER: #8-6/2026
PREPARED BY: Skylar Camerlinck
HEARING DATES: PC: July 7, 2026 BOS: July 14, 2026
ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials
Maps (Aerial, Zoning, Future Land Use)
Photographs
AG-1 District Regulations
Kennel, Commercial Use and Design Standards
Rural Village Future Land Use Designation
VDOT Maps
VDOT Comment 6/11/2026
Citizen Comments
County Code – Animal & Fowl – Dogs, Cats & Other Animals
County Code – Noise Ordinance 271 of 392
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Only
0a1�,�•v.x1. J/'3//U Received by x(...C
5204 Bernard Drive Apphcauonft:c il57.SO l'CIBZAdaic: 612126
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018 (540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7l55
ALL APPLICANTS
Placards is.wed
C� N1mbcr 8-6/2026
BOS dille. {)'23/ 26
Check type of,,plication filed (check all that apply)
o Rezoning v'Special Use a Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal o Comp Plan (tS.l-2232) Review
Applicants na me/address w/zip Travis Bell
6754 Grubb Road
Roanoke. VA 24018
Phone:
Cell#:
Owner's name/address w/zip Travis and Cloyse w. Bell6754 Grubb Road Roanoke. VA 24018
Phone#:
Cell ii:
Email:
Property Location
Tax Map No.:
Size ofparce l(s): Acres:
Magisterial Dis trict: Cave Spring
Co mmunity Planning area: Back Creek
Existing Zoning: AG-1
Existing Land Use: Single-Family Residential
REZONING, SPEGAl USE PERMIT, WA/YER AND COMP PLAN (/$.Z.11J1J REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP)
Proposed Zoning: No Change
Proposed Land Use: Small scale home-based commercial kennel
Doest � parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes 'if No L IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST {Rezoning).
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type in Anicle IV (Special Use Permit)? Yes No ✓
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes
VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (YIWIAA)
Variance/Waiver of Section(s) __________ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision lo _____________________ _
Appeal oflnterpretation ofSection(s): _____ ofthe Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal oflnterpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE
ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOl\1PLETE.
R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP VIAA R/S/W/CP \'/AA
Consula11ion §ii 8 112" x 11" concept plan
�
Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property o"ncr.i
I hertby certify th:it I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or con1rae1 purchaser :ind am acting with the knowledge and
consent f the owner. V 1 ,'J _ /'l ,,, </'t \.' (.,/,_ • �-� Owner's Siglllllure
2
3.64
# 096.04-04-29.00-0000 and 096.04-04-28.00-0000
6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road
272 of 392
273 of 392
January 1, 2026
6754 Grubb Road Justification Page 1 of 2
Attachment A
Justification Statement
Request and Justification for Special Use Permit
A.“In general terms the change in use of the property” –
To Include a small, home-based, commercial dog kennel business using existing home, fenced back yard and
detached garage.
B.“The Effect of the changes on the surrounding area” -
No changes to existing structures or landscape.
No changes to public utilities
No changes to street access
Minimal traffic impact
Minimal noise impact
C.“The reasons for the request” –
There is a growing demand for professional pet care services, particularly among busy professionals and
families with demanding schedules and those looking to enrich their pet’s life and wellbeing.
Pet owners are seeking reliable, convenient, and comprehensive services such as boarding, daycare,
grooming, and training, often requiring a convenient, neighborhood provider.
The demand is further supported by the fact that many pet owners are willing to pay for high-quality care,
especially when it includes safety, comfort, convenience and personalized attention.
D.“Consistency of the request with the Community Plan” –
“Most of the land in Back Creek is intended to remain rural and agricultural. 78.4% of land is designated as
Rural Preserve and Rural Village to protect the rural character of the area.”
This request supports the rural nature of this area by making no changes to the existing landscape, no
new construction, no impact to public utilities, and limited impact on local traffic and noise while
providing services for the local community and increasing the tax base.
E.“Consistency of the request with the general purposes of the Zoning Ordinance”
This project supports the stated guidelines for properties in the AG1 zone in the following ways.
1)“The purpose of this district is to encourage these areas to remain in their rural state, and
protect sensitive and unique land resources from degradation, consistent with the
recommendations of the comprehensive plan for the rural preserve areas.”
-This project plans no external changes to existing structures or landscape.
2)“This may be accomplished by maintaining the existing agricultural lands and preventing the
encroachment of incompatible land uses, while allowing development to occur at a
reasonable density.”
-This will be a small home-based business serving the local community. It will not
require any changes to the surrounding land and will not implement any land uses that
conflict with the spirit and intent of the guidelines.
274 of 392
January 1, 2026
6754 Grubb Road Justification Page 2 of 2
3)“This district is also intended to minimize the demand for unanticipated public improvements
and services, such as public sewer and water, by reducing development densities and
discouraging large scale development.”
-No new construction is required.
-No changes to the existing public utilities will be required.
-No changes to the public street access or parking areas will be required.
F.“The purpose stated at the beginning of the applicable district regulations” –
This request is in line with the purposes as stated in Sec. 30-3 of the Zoning Ordinance which is “designed
to give reasonable consideration to each of the following purposes:”
-Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the
tax base
-Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community;
275 of 392
276 of 392
! "## !% !&.12,.13+*4+3)/3.2,,5(.0(362**.780)/)623./0,2/9:1)12/96+29/)3-+7.32<+6)9)32.,)92/2,51.1+*3())=.13./02/946+4+1)9362**.74)63.9.A.1.+/-2.A)6?4:@,.7136))3-2.A)6?+614)7.2,:1)4)6<.36)B:)13CD**3().3)<1+/3())/1:./0,.13?-)6)7+<<)/93(235+:<))3-.3(2E+2**.7)/0./))6?2/9F+6G.60./.2H)4263<)/3+*'62/14+6323.+/132**3+3.+/2,362**.76),23)9./*+6<23.+/3(23<25/))93+@)1:@<.33)9-.3(3(4)9.3)5+:6244,.723.+/46+7)11C/7,:1.A)2/93()E+:/35132**2/9GHK'6)1)6A)3()6.0(9))<)9/)7)11265CLVWXYXRSZNYO[SY\]^X^_NYObXVTScNbdRX^N\XYZNSb^ef\NgN^NhY^ijebZNVTScNbdRX^N\XYZNSbeYNZ^ihRklSRZcXYZ^mSYno\mXbbNYOeYNZ^X^ZSeRSYZqmNZPhRmNZPheZ\RNgXVZPRheOPmNY\hm^rS^^ZSZNhYsthYgXYNXYUX^ZhRXstSRmS^PXZSNb^PhlsaPhllNYOUXYZXRTTNUX^qNYUbe\NYO_TNYSYUNSbNY^ZNZeZNhY^iOXYXRSbicX\NUSbiXZUvrXONhYSblefbNUTSUNbNZNX^w\eUSZNhYSbspXURXSZNhYSbTSUNbNZNX^XbNONhe^S^^XcfbNX^hZXbsjhZXbhbTUheR^XMh^lNZSbsxeR^NYOPhcXstbNYNU\e^ZRNSb^NZXszSUZhRdSdUSRXUXYZXRSY}hYV^lXUNTNUe^XRX~eX^Z^R}aNZeSZNhY^_XgXbhlcXYZS\SUXYZZhsmNZPSUUX^^hYZhsmNZPNYo€€VTZhTNYZXR^XUZNhYhTSbS^^NTNX\S^SYSRZXRNSbRhS\qXvOvipZX i‚ƒi oi niƒ„€i sƒ„€i‚‚€i‚‚ iƒhRYXmlPS^X^hRUPSYOX^ZhS\XgXbhlcXYZmPXRXSlRXgNhe^bd^efcNZZX\ZRSTTNUhRXZPSYZmhq‚rdXSR^hb\SY\shRRhS\mSdUhY\NZNhY^PSgXUPSYOX\^NOYNTNUSYZbdPXYRX~eNRX\ZhXgSbeSZXSUUX^^N^^eX^XgXbhlcXYZmNZPNYORX^^sXORX^^hYRhS\^lbSYYX\hR^UPX\ebX\ThRX‡lSY^NhYimN\lRhgXcXYZ^iXZUvqNvXvhY[hYOpSYOXQRSY^lhRZSZNhYˆbSYiaN‡V‰RphS\ˆbSYiXZUvXgXbhlcXYZNYSYSRXSmPXRXZPXRXN^S}YhmYX‡N^ZNYOZRSTTNUSY\shR^STXZdlRhfbXXgXbhlcXYZmheb\lhZXYZNSbbdYXOSZNgXbdNclSUZX‡N^ZNYOslbSYYX\ZRSTTNU^NOYSbq^ref^ZSYZNSb\XlSRZeRXTRhcZPXthcceYNZdˆbSYYd^NZXZPSZN^X‡lXUZX\ZhOXYXRSZXhgXRhYXPeY\RX\q €€rZRNl^\eRNYOZPXlXSXZRSTTNUOXYXRSZhRhRZPXlXS}PheRhYZPXS\SUXYZ^ZRXXZ^ihRhgXR^XgXYPeYno€rZRNl^NYSYSgXRSOX\Sd
277 of 392
278 of 392
January 2, 2026
6754 Grubb Road – Site Description Page 1 of 1
Site Information
6754 Grubb Road
Owners:
Travis Bell
Cloyse Bell
Property:
6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road
Lot Size - 2 acres and 1.64 acres
Zone – AG1
Parcel ID - 096.04-04-29.00-0000 and 096.04-04-28.00-0000
Neighborhood
-C006 – Sugar Rum Ridge, Cave Spring
-Back Creek
Site Utilities:
Private well
Private Septic system
Oil heat
Driveway - Asphalt/Gravel
Parking - Gravel
Fire Hydrant Location - >1000 feet
Property Description:
These properties contains 3.64 AC of land with a(n) RURAL HOM ESITE / SMALL style building, Built
about 1920, having primary VINYL OR ALUMINUM exterior and CORRUGATED SHEET METAL roof cover,
2 bedroom(s), 1 full bath(s), 0 half bath(s).
Additional buildings include playhouse, old spring house, detached garage and an o ld barn. The garage
and the house are the only two buildings to be used for this business.
The property is bordered on two sides by year-round streams and all sides by tall stands of mature trees
and woodlands with steep slopes.
Tall mature shrubs line both sides of the driveway and across the front of the home.
The distance to all adjacent homes is greater than 200 feet and the steep slopes create significant
elevation differences between this home and the surrounding properties.
All adjoining properties are zoned AG1 and have a minimum acreage of 1.5 acres.
The property boundaries include existing creeks and steep slopes that would present a challenging
environment to add additional building sites adjacent to the property lines.
279 of 392
January 1, 2026
6754 Grubb Road – Project Description Page 1 of 1
Project Description
Providing pet services, including boarding, daycare, grooming, and related services while offering pet owners peace
of mind during their absence will be the focus of this endeavor.
The core services include private indoor suites for boarding, supervised daycare with structured playgroups and
socialization, and basic grooming services. Services can be tailored to specific dog types or age groups such as
puppies and senior dogs.
Safety and comfort are mission critical and the business prioritizes operational excellence through structured daily
schedules, secure fencing, sanitation protocols, security camera monitoring, emergency preparedness, 24/7 on-site
supervision and climate-controlled suites.
Services are designed to meet both daily and long-term care needs, fostering a “home away from home”
environment for the pets while providing peace of mind for their families.
The kennel will generate a minimal amount of various waste streams, including solid waste (fecal matter, cleaning
rags, animal hair), and grey water from grooming activities.
Solid waste, such as trash, paper, and animal feces will be collected in sturdy, leak-proof bags and included with
normal home refuse pickup. There will be no composting of solid waste.
Grey water from grooming services will be discharged into the home septic system.
The kennel will install and operate a kennel silencer.
There will be no crematoria or land burial of animals in association with this kennel.
Services
Boarding
Daily average goal of 2 participants per day
Two climate-controlled suites (approximately 275 total sqft) located in main home
Suites can accommodate multiple dogs from same family
Doggie Daycare
Daily average goal of 5 -10 participants per day
1800 sqft common playground located between house and detached garage
240 sqft detached garage for indoor area and kennels
No individual run
Grooming
Weekly average goal of 3 baths
Weekly average goal of 3 nail trimmings
Hours of Service
Office Hours - Mon-Sat - 7:30 am to 6:00 pm
Sunday - Closed
Doggie Day Care
Drop Off - Mon - Sat - 7:30 am to 9:00 am
Sunday - Closed
Pickup - Mon - Sat - 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm
Sunday - Closed
Boarding
Drop Off - Mon - Sat - 7:30 am to 9:00 am
Sunday - Closed
Pickup - Mon - Sun - 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm 280 of 392
January 2, 2026
6754 Grubb Road – Master Concept Plan Page 1 of 1
Master Concept Plan
For Kennel Business at 6754 Grubb Road
The master concept plan for a small, home-based, commercial dog kennel business centers
on creating a safe, nurturing, and enriching environment that treats dogs as family while
providing peace of mind for pet owners.
The core concept is to move beyond the traditional image of a "kennel" as a restrictive,
cage-based facility and instead position the business as a premium, pet care destination
that emphasizes safety, comfort, personalization, and emotional wellbeing.
This involves offering a variety of integrated services such as overnight boarding with
private indoor suites and a structured, supervised doggie daycare program with playgroups
and socialization.
The business model is based on providing premium value services, focusing on busy
professionals, suburban families, first-time dog owners, and pet parents seeking specialized
care for high-anxiety or special-needs dogs.
Success hinges on offering unique features like private, climate-controlled suites, agility
equipment in play yards, 24/7 on-site supervision, and personalized care routines.
The concept also embraces technology to ensure the safety and monitor the wellbeing of all
participants by utilizing security cameras with two-way communication and also providing
daily video streaming for doggie daycare participants, allowing owners to view their pets
interacting with other participants.
The master concept includes scalability through future expansion, such as adding additional
boarding suites and play areas, enhanced grooming services, obedience training and a retail
section for treats, toys and accessories.
Ultimately, the vision is to become a trusted, community-centered service known for
exceptional care, safety, and personalized attention, fostering strong customer loyalty and
word-of-mouth referrals.
281 of 392
Page 1 of 1 Adjoining Properties
Adjoining Properties for 6754 Grubb Road
Donald W. Cromer
6885 Mason Knob Trl, Roanoke Va, 24018
Tax Parcel ID 096.04-04-24.00-0000
Ray D. Franklin
6720 Grubb Rd, Roanoke Va, 24018
Tax Parcel ID 096.04-04-31.00-0000
Elaine T. Quiroz
0 Sugar Rum Ridge Rd, Roanoke Va, 24018
Tax Parcel ID 096.04-04-34.00-0000
Larry G. and Joyce M. Overstreet
6823 Trelawny Trl, Roanoke Va, 24018
Tax Parcel ID 096.04-04-35.00-0000
William S. and Deidre O. Rea
6820 Sugar Rum Ridge Rd, Roanoke Va, 24018
Tax Parcel ID 096.04-04-54.00-0000
282 of 392
283 of 392
284 of 392
285 of 392
286 of 392
Topographical Map with Elevations for 6754 Grubb Road
p
287 of 392
resentation of Elevation Differences
For 6754 Grubb Road
288 of 392
289 of 392
290 of 392
RV
6754 and 0 Grubb Road - Future Land Use Map
Roanoke County
0 0.05 0.10.03 mi
0 0.08 0.160.04 km
1:3,827
Rural Village
Future Land Use
291 of 392
6754 and 0 Grubb Road - Aerial Map
Vantor, Roanoke County
0 0.05 0.10.03 mi
0 0.08 0.160.04 km
1:3,827
292 of 392
AG1
AG1
AR
AR
AG1
AG1
AG1
6754 and 0 Grubb Road - Zoning Map
Roanoke County
0 0.05 0.10.03 mi
0 0.08 0.160.04 km
1:3,827Zoning
AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density
AR, Agricultural/Residential
AR
293 of 392
294 of 392
295 of 392
296 of 392
297 of 392
298 of 392
299 of 392
300 of 392
301 of 392
302 of 392
303 of 392
304 of 392
305 of 392
306 of 392
307 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 1 of 4
SEC. 30-33. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-33-1. Purpose.
(A) The AG-1, agricultural/rural low density district consists of land primarily used as farmland, woodlands, and
scattered residential development located within the rural service area. Also found in these areas are lands
with steep slopes, and groundwater recharge areas. Many of the county's unique natural and scenic
resources are also found in this district. The purpose of this district is to encourage these areas to remain in
their rural state, and protect sensitive and unique land resources from degradation, consistent with the
recommendations of the comprehensive plan for the rural preserve areas. This may be accomplished by
maintaining the existing agricultural lands and preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses, while
allowing development to occur at a reasonable density. Non-farm residents should recognize that they are
located in an agricultural environment where the right-to-farm has been established as county policy. This
district is also intended to minimize the demand for unanticipated public improvements and services, such as
public sewer and water, by reducing development densities and discouraging large scale development.
(Ord. No. 042799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-33-2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this
ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV,
use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses.
Agriculture
Agritourism *
Farm Brewery *
Farm Distillery *
Farm Employee Housing *
Farm Winery *
Forestry Operations *
Stable, Commercial *
Stable, Private *
Wayside Stand *
2. Residential Uses.
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type II *
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Accessory *
308 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 2 of 4
Manufactured Home, Emergency *
Multiple Dog Permit *
Residential Human Care Facility
Single-Family Dwelling, Detached
3. Civic Uses.
Community Recreation *
Family Day Care Home *
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Religious Assembly *
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
4. Commercial Uses.
Bed and Breakfast *
Short-Term Rental *
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
5. Miscellaneous Uses.
Amateur Radio Tower *
Wind Energy System, Small*
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 1 *
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 2 *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates
additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those
specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses.
Commercial Feedlots *
2. Residential Uses
Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems *
3. Civic Uses.
Camps *
Cemetery *
Day Care Center *
Utility Services, Major *
4. Commercial Uses.
309 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 3 of 4
Agricultural Services *
Antique Shops *
Bed and Breakfast Inn *
Campgrounds *
Country Inn *
Golf Course *
Kennel, Commercial *
Special Events Facility *
Studio, Fine Arts
5. Industrial Uses.
Composting *
Custom Manufacturing *
Landfill, Construction Debris *
Landfill, Sanitary *
Resource Extraction *
6. Miscellaneous Uses.
Aviation Facilities, Private *
Broadcasting Tower *
Outdoor Gatherings *
Shooting Range, Outdoor *
Wind Energy System, Large*
Wind Energy System, Utility*
Wireless Communication Facility, Class 3 *
(Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, § 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 42694-
12, § 7, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05;
Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No.
091311-7, § 1, 9-13-11; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13; Ord. No. 062816-4, § 1, 6-28-16; Ord. No. 082818-8, §
1, 8-28-18; Ord. No. 020921-8, § 1, 2-9-21; Ord. No. 072225-9, § 1, 7-22-25)
Sec. 30-33-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use
and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. All lots, regardless of sewer and water provisions:
a. Area: 1.5 acres (65,340 square feet).
310 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 4 of 4
b. Frontage: 150 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
c. Maximum width to depth ratio: 1 to 5 (W to D) on streets in existence prior to the adoption
of this ordinance.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 20 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 20 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.
5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be
located 150 feet from the street and 20 feet from any side property line.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
1. All structures: 45 feet.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 20 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 40 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13)
311 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 1 of 1
Sec. 30-85-18. Kennel, Commercial.
(A)General standards:
1.Each commercial kennel shall install and operate a kennel silencer.
2.Animal waste shall [be] disposed of in a manner acceptable to the department of health.
3.Crematoria or land burial of animals in association with a commercial kennel shall be prohibited.
(B)Additional standards in the AG-3:
1.The minimum area required for a commercial kennel shall be two (2) acres.
2.All outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated with a commercial kennel shall
be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any property line. The zoning administrator
may allow a reduction in the 100-foot setback. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to provide
documentation in support of such a reduction. The zoning administrator may request additional
materials as necessary. In making such determinations, the zoning administrator shall consider factors
including, but not limited to, (a) topography on site and on adjacent properties, (b) existing vegetation
on site, (c) planting of additional landscaping, (d) size and scope of the proposed kennel operation, and
(e) surrounding land uses.
3.When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be
provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
4.The site shall front on and have direct access to a publicly owned and maintained street.
(C)Additional standards in the AG-3, AG-1, AR and AV districts:
1.The minimum area required for a commercial kennel shall be two (2) acres.
2.All outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated with a commercial kennel shall
be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any property line. The 100-foot setback may be
reduced by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors during the special use permit process.
3.When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be
provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
4.The site shall front on and have direct access to a publicly owned and maintained street.
(D)Additional standards in the C-2 district:
1.All outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated with a commercial kennel shall
be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any property line. The zoning administrator
may allow a reduction in the 100-foot setback. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to provide
documentation in support of such a reduction. The zoning administrator may request additional
materials as necessary. In making such determinations, the zoning administrator shall consider factors
including, but not limited to, (a) topography on site and on adjacent properties, (b) existing vegetation
on site, (c) planting of additional landscaping, (d) size and scope of the proposed kennel operation, and
(e) surrounding land uses.
312 of 392
Appendices
A future land use area where limited development activity has historically occurred and where suburban
or urban development patterns are discouraged. These rural community and farming areas are generally
in between the intense suburban development patterns already established in the County and the
designated Conservation and Rural Preserve areas.
Land Use Types
Rural Housing - Low-density single-family residential generally averaging one unit per acre. Cluster
developments are encouraged.
Rural Community Centers - Nonresidential uses which serve rural residents such as outdoor recreation and
park facilities, religious facilities, schools, fire and rescue stations and clubs.
Agricultural Production and Services - Livestock, orchards and crop productions, landscape and horticultural
services, veterinary services, farm labor and farm management services. Generally including all activities
that support land-based uses.
Forest and Wood Products - Includes the operation of timber tracts, tree farms, forest nurseries and the
gathering of forest products. Excludes sawmills and large-scale timber cutting operations.
Small Scale Commercial - Limited commercial operations that serve the local, rural community. Included
would be personal services and retail convenience stores.
Rural Parks and Outdoor Recreation - Parks and recreational facilities that are designed to preserve the
environmentally sensitive character of the rural landscape.
Land Use Determinants
Existing Land Use Pattern - Locations where very low density residential, institutional and limited agricultural
uses have developed.
Existing Zoning - Locations where rural residential and agricultural zoning have been established.
Rural Residential Expansion Areas - Locations where small scale, very low density rural residential housing is
desirable.
Agricultural - Locations where existing agricultural uses and activities are present.
Access - Locations served by an existing improved rural road and, to a lesser extent, rural arterial highways.
Rural Sector - Locations outside the urban service area.
RURAL VILLAGE
313 of 392
314 of 392
315 of 392
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
731 Harrison Ave.
Salem, VA 24153-0560
June 11, 2026
Ms. Skylar Camerlinck
Roanoke County Community Development Department
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
RE: Planning Commission Request
Special Use— Commercial Kennel in AG-1
Roanoke County
Route 653—Grubb Road
Dear Ms. Camerlinck,
We have reviewed the above-mentioned special use request. It appears from the information
provided that granting use of this property for a residence and commercial kennel will not
adversely impact the VDOT right-of-way. Any future expansions or redevelopment of the parcel
or alteration to the existing drive may require VDOT review, approval, and permitting.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ashley C. Mothena, P.E.
Acting Resident Engineer
VDOT, Salem Residency
ckb/
STEPHEN C. BRICH, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
316 of 392
WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution!
This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system.
Report Suspicious
From:Deirdre Rea
To:Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Bell application for a commercial kennel
Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2026 1:42:52 PM
Mr. Camerlinck,
I am in receipt of a letter regarding Travis Bell's application for a commercial kennel on his
property. I do plan to attend the public hearings but wanted to raise some concerns. While
the Bells may have just under 2 acres of land, only a tiny parcel of that is fenced (approx 8 feet
by 8 feet). They are stating that there will be no changes to the landscape. If that is the case,
the outdoor space is inadequate to serve 4 dogs. Having owned 4 dogs at one time, I had to
maintain at least an acre of fenced land plus a separate fenced enclosure with a dog house
despite the fact that my dogs lived in the house. The application states they will accept dogs
with anxiety problems. Such close confines can increase anxiety - and subsequent barking- for
dogs such as these. Their case is predicated on a need for kennels. There is a large,
commercial kennel with all the same services just down Cotton Hill Road on Branico Rd so
there is no local need for this.
Is he going to be permitted to have outdoor kennels - especially with his planned expansion?
With constant wildlife of deer, raccoons, bear, coyotes, etc., here, the dogs will bark. What are
the regulations once this is approved? Will there be restrictions on the degree of expansion?
Right now, they state they will not make any changes to the landscape or add building
structures. Can they do that once this gets approved? These are questions we need answered.
A major concern is noise. I live in a family residence with 4 bedrooms. Will families with young
children who nap want to hear barking day and night? As a researcher who works from home,
barking will interrupt my ability to work. This is a private, quiet area and our road is a one-lane
road with no accesses or turn-arounds. We are already getting strangers wandering up our
road trying to find this kennel, getting lost and blocking our traffic patterns. All of this affects
my property values.
I would like to know what restrictions will be in place after this is approved as it relates to
expansion.
I would like to know if you have observed the fenced premises yourself.
Thank you,
Dr. Deirdre Rea
6820 Sugar Rum Ridge Rd 317 of 392
Roanoke, VA 24018
318 of 392
WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution!
This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system.
Report Suspicious
From:Glenna Gray
To:Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Proposed Dog Kennel at 6754 Grub Rd.
Date:Sunday, May 31, 2026 10:36:17 AM
INCOMING EMAIL SECURITY WARNING: This message may contain Sensitive
Information. You cannot include the sensitive information in the reply to this message. When
replying to this message, DO NOT include the original message. If the need arises to
communicate sensitive or confidential information outside of the Roanoke County system,
please add the encryption keyword to the subject line to send via SecureMail.
As a county resident who lives nearby, I oppose having a commercial property of this type on
my doorstep. I just found out about this application for a permit and feel it does not benefit or
blend well with our residential neighborhood.
I am a 24/7 care giver and will be unable to attend the hearing on 6/2. I do, however, want to
make my feelings known. I think that the noise, odors, additional traffic and associated
problems are unwelcome in a residential neighborhood. In addition, I believe that property
values, as well as, quality of living in this quiet, family oriented neighborhood will be
negatively impacted. Please deny this application or grant a continuance since we have not
received a timely notice.
Thank you!
Glenna Gray
6700 Mason Knob Trail
Roanoke. VA 24018
(540) 556-6533
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
319 of 392
Roanoke County Planning Commission Board
June 2, 2026
Re: Permit request for commercial kennel at 6754 Grubb Rd.
Dear Planning Commission Board,
As a 20-year resident of Sugar Rum Ridge Rd., I would like to voice several concerns
regarding the application for a special use permit to operate a commercial dog kennel at
6754 Grubb Rd.
First, I will say that I do not have a problem in general with Mr. Bell oAering pet daycare
services to a few friends and family, as I believe he has been doing for several years without
any serious problems.
Approval of expanding their services to a commercial level concerns me for the following
reasons:
1. Setting precedent for additional expanded commercial development in an
otherwise totally residential neighborhood.
2. Safety of neighborhood children and pets as well as wildlife if there was a breach.
3. TraAic impact and increased road wear.
4. Privacy and security for our mail and package delivery as our mail is delivered to a
bank of boxes near the entrance to Mr. Bell’s property.
5. Privacy on our no-outlet road which oAers very little turn-around space at the end of
the road.
6. Noise
7. Potential environmental impact with additional animals and with additional services
including bathing and grooming.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jenna & Frank Giannini
6857 Sugar Rum Ridge Road, Roanoke, VA
320 of 392
WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution!
This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system.
Report Suspicious
From:Mary Clifford Brewer
To:Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Back Creek Kennel
Date:Monday, June 1, 2026 8:53:19 PM
Attachments:Kennel.docx
Thank you for the opportunity to voice questions.
321 of 392
To: Skylar Camerlinck, Roanoke County Planning
Re: Back CreekK-9 Retreat
• Have sanitation requirements and inspections been met? A search did not
reveal any public inspection records.
• How are feces and wastewater handled? Waste runoff can contaminate soil
and water.
• Back Creek K-9 Retreat on Grubb Rd lists the year it was established as
2023, and their Facebook page says they offer overnight boarding.
• Its BBB file opened in 2024, but it is not an accredited BBB business.
• My husband and I have been hearing a pack of dogs barking at night, for
more than a year, but didn’t know where it was coming from.
322 of 392
WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution!
This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system.
Report Suspicious
From:Roger Elkin
To:Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:[EXTERNAL] -
Date:Tuesday, June 2, 2026 4:47:11 PM
My name is Roger Elkin and my wife and I have lived at 6459 Cotton Hill Rd. more
than 30 years. We found out about this application from a neighbor, and not
because we received a notice from the County or because we saw a sign on Cotton
Hill Rd. The only sign is at the end of the driveway of the applicant.
After reviewing the application, I have the following concerns:
1. The distribution of notices is much too limited. It does not include property
owners who will likely be impacted by the operation of a commercial kennel. This
includes the owner of a property less than 500' from the applicant's site. It does not
include property owners who already hear the continuous sound of barking. And it
does not include many of us who, if this business is not managed properly, may
have their property values reduced. I would strongly suggest that the Planning Dept
staff hold a neighborhood meeting where the applicant can explain the project in
person and respond to questions of his neighbors.
2. The minimum lot size for a dog kennel in Roanoke County is 2 acres. Although
the application states that the parcel is 2 acres, the survey provided by the applicant
states that it is 1.984 acres. Complying with the size requirement in code would
likely require a lot line adjustment, at a minimum. This is particularly concerning
as the applicant states his desire to expand the operation in the future.
3. There does not appear to be involvement of the Health Department. Dog
kennels are a potential source of runoff containing E-Coli. As the applicant states,
this property has creeks running on two sides. Based on the photos, it appears that
the rain runoff from the fenced area drains directly into the streams without
barriers.
Per the EPA: "Pet waste is a leading source of nutrient and bacteria pollution
in urban streams and waterways (Wood, 2017)"
The following is a summary of research on dog kennel management practices with
sources:
"Dog kennels and outdoor runs can be significant, nonpoint sources of \(E. coli\)323 of 392
in streams if waste is not properly managed. When left unmanaged, pet waste
and wash water introduce high concentrations of fecal bacteria into surface
waters via stormwater runoff and drainage ditches. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Risk of \(E. coli\) from Kennels
A single gram of dog waste contains an estimated 23 million fecal coliform
colonies. Dogs are frequent carriers of pathogenic \(E. coli\). If an outdoor
kennel, pasture, or dog run drains directly toward a waterway, heavy rain or
snowmelt will wash bacteria-laden soil and waste straight into local creeks.
Additionally, the water used to hose down concrete runs or kennel floors must
be contained; if this wash water enters storm drains, it pollutes watershed
streams without passing through a treatment facility. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
Prevention and Management Strategies
To prevent kennel runoff from contaminating local waterways, facility owners
and pet owners should employ the following best practices:
Vegetated Buffers: Maintain a well-vegetated buffer strip (at least 50 to
100 feet wide, depending on local regulations) between outdoor pet areas
and nearby surface waters to filter runoff. [1]
Proper Waste Disposal: Pick up dog feces daily. Dispose of the waste
properly in the trash, via a permitted pet-waste composting system, or by
flushing it down an indoor toilet (which sends it to a wastewater treatment
plant). Do not leave uncollected waste or bagged poop on the ground
where rain can wash it away. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Kennel Wash-Downs: Ensure wash water from indoor or hosed-down
kennels drains into a municipal sanitary sewer or an approved septic
system. Never route kennel wash water to outdoor ditches or storm
drains. [1, 2, 3, 4]"
It is not clear if any management practices are in practice in this
kennel.
I have reviewed the statement of support signed by several individuals.
Based on the addresses provided, it does not appear that any of the
individuals live within the neighborhood.
I request that the commissioners support a continuance of this application
and direct the staff to seek a neighborhood meeting with the applicant.
Roger Elkin
324 of 392
EPA Source
https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-01/bmp-pet-waste-
management.pdf
325 of 392
326 of 392
327 of 392
328 of 392
329 of 392
330 of 392
331 of 392
332 of 392
PART I - CODE OF THE COUNTY
Chapter 5 - ANIMALS AND FOWL
ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS
Roanoke County, Virginia, Code of Ordinances Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 1 of 18
ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
Sec. 5-21. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by
this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary:
Adequate care or care: The responsible practice of good animal husbandry, handling, production,
management, confinement, feeding, watering, protection, shelter, transportation, treatment, and, when
necessary, euthanasia, appropriate for the age, species, condition, size and type of the animal and the provision of
veterinary care when needed to prevent suffering or impairment of health.
Adequate exercise or exercise: The opportunity for the animal to move sufficiently to maintain normal muscle
tone and mass for the age, species, size, and condition of the animal.
Adequate feed: Access to and the provision of food that is of sufficient quantity and nutritive value to
maintain each animal in good health; is accessible to each animal; is prepared so as to permit ease of consumption
for the age, species, condition, size and type of each animal; is provided in a clean and sanitary manner; is placed
so as to minimize contamination by excrement and pests; and is provided at suitable intervals for the species, age,
and condition of the animal, but at least once daily, except as prescribed by a veterinarian or as dictated by
naturally occurring states of hibernation or fasting normal for the species.
Adequate shelter: Provision of and access to shelter that is suitable for the species, age, condition, size, and type of
each animal; provides adequate space for each animal; is safe and protects each animal from injury, rain, sleet,
snow, hail, direct sunlight, the adverse effects of heat or cold, physical suffering, and impairment of health; is
properly lighted; is properly cleaned; enables each animal to be clean and dry, except when detrimental to the
species; and, for dogs and cats, provides a solid surface, resting platform, pad, floormat, or similar device that is
large enough for the animal to lie on in a normal manner and can be maintained in a sanitary manner. Under this
chapter, shelters whose wire, grid, or slat floors:
(1) Permit the animals' feet to pass through the openings;
(2) Sag under the animals' weight; or
(3) Otherwise do not protect the animals' feet or toes from injury are not adequate shelter.
Adequate space: Sufficient space to allow each animal to:
(1) Easily stand, sit, lie, turn-about, and make all other normal body movements in a comfortable, normal
position for the animal; and
(2) Interact safely with other animals in the enclosure.
When an animal is tethered, "adequate space" means a tether that permits the above actions and is
appropriate to the age and size of the animal; is attached to the animal by a properly applied collar, halter, or
harness configured so as to protect the animal from injury and prevent the animal or tether from becoming
entangled with other objects or animals, or from extending over an object or edge that could result in the
strangulation or injury of the animal; and is at least three (3) times the length of the animal, as measured from the
tip of its nose to the base of its tail, except when the animal is being walked on a leash or is attached by a tether to
333 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 2 of 18
a lead line. When freedom of movement would endanger the animal, temporarily and appropriately restricting
movement of the animal according to professionally accepted standards for the species is considered provision of
adequate space.
Adequate water: Provision of and access to clean, fresh, potable water of a drinkable temperature that is
provided in a suitable manner, in sufficient volume, and at suitable intervals, but at least once every twelve (12)
hours, to maintain normal hydration for the age, species, condition, size and type of each animal, except as
prescribed by a veterinarian or as dictated by naturally occurring states of hibernation or fasting normal for the
species; and is provided in clean, durable receptacles that are accessible to each animal and are placed so as to
minimize contamination of the water by excrement and pests or an alternative source of hydration consistent with
generally accepted husbandry practices.
Animal nuisance: Is created when any companion animal, dog, cat or other domestic animal unreasonably annoys
humans, endangers the life or health of other animals or persons or substantially interferes with the rights of
citizens, other than their owners, to the enjoyment of life or property. Such acts of nuisance shall include, but are
not limited to, the following:
(1) Damages property other than that of the animal's owner;
(2) Attacks or disturbs other animals, persons or vehicles by chasing, barking or biting;
(3) Makes excessive noises including, but not limited to, barking, whining, howling, caterwauling or crying;
(4) Creates noxious or offensive odors;
(5) Defecates upon any public place or upon premises not owned or controlled by the owner unless
promptly removed by the animal's owner; or
(6) Creates an unsanitary condition or insect breeding site due to an accumulation of excreta or filth.
Capon: A neutered male chicken.
Cat: Any member of the animal species Felis catus.
Chicken: A domestic fowl, Gallus domesticus.
Chicken enclosure: A fenced or wire area, in addition to a coop, that provides chickens with a predator-
resistant, outside space.
Coop: A building or enclosed structure that houses chickens and provides shelter from the elements and
from predators.
Companion animal: Any domestic or feral dog, domestic or feral cat, nonhuman primate, guinea pig,
hamster, rabbit not raised for human food or fiber, exotic or native animal, reptile, exotic or native bird, or any
feral animal or any animal under the care, custody, or ownership of a person or any animal that is bought, sold,
traded, or bartered by any person. Agricultural animals, game species, or any animals regulated under federal law
as research animals shall not be considered companion animals for the purposes of this chapter.
Dangerous dog: A canine or canine crossbreed that has bitten, attacked, or inflicted injury on a person or
companion animal that is a dog or cat or killed a companion animal that is a dog or cat; however, when a dog
attacks or bites a companion animal that is a dog or cat, the attacking or biting dog shall not be deemed
dangerous:
(1) If no serious physical injury as determined by a licensed veterinarian has occurred to the dog or cat as a
result of the attack or bite;
(2) Both animals are owned by the same person;
(3) If such attack occurs on the property of the owner or custodian of the attacking or biting dog; or
334 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 3 of 18
(4) For other good cause as determined by the court.
No dog shall be found to be a dangerous dog as a result of biting, attacking or inflicting injury on a dog or cat
while engaged with an owner or custodian as part of lawful hunting or participating in an organized, lawful dog
handling event.
Dog: Every dog or canine, canine crossbreed or hybrid canine, regardless of age.
Domestic animal: Any dog, cat, domesticated sheep, horses, cattle, goats, swine, fowl, ducks, geese, turkeys,
confined domestic hares and rabbits and other birds and animals raised and maintained in confinement.
Hen: A female chicken.
Hybrid canine: Any animal or its offspring which at any time has been or is permitted, registered, licensed,
advertised or otherwise described or represented as a hybrid canine, wolf or coyote by its owner to a licensed
veterinarian, law-enforcement officer, animal warden, humane investigator, official of the department of health,
or compliance officer who is under the direction of the state veterinarian.
Kennel: An enclosure or structure used to house, shelter, restrain, exercise, board, breed, handle or
otherwise keep or care for more than three (3) dogs four (4) months of age or older, from which they cannot
escape. The enclosure or structure shall not mean a dwelling or a fence used to demarcate a property line. For
purposes of this chapter and the license tax, the term "kennel" shall also include "multiple dog permit."
Livestock: Cattle, horses, sheep, goats, swine and enclosed, domesticated rabbits or hares.
Other officer: All persons employed by the county or elected by the people of the county whose duty it is to
preserve the peace, to make arrests or to enforce the law.
Owner: Any person having a right of property in a companion animal, dog or cat, and any person who keeps
or harbors a companion animal, dog or cat or has the companion animal, dog or cat in his care or who acts as its
custodian, and any person who permits a companion animal, dog or cat to remain on or about any premises
occupied by him.
Poultry: All domestic fowl and game birds raised in captivity.
Rooster: A male chicken usually kept for breeding.
To run at large: A domestic or feral dog, exotic or poisonous animal or exotic bird or poultry shall be deemed
to run at large while roaming, running or self-hunting off the property of its owner or custodian and not under its
owner's or custodian's immediate control.
Vicious dog: A canine or canine crossbreed that has:
(1) Killed a person;
(2) Inflicted serious injury to a person, including multiple bites, serious disfigurement, serious impairment
of health, or serious impairment of a bodily function; or
(3) Continued to exhibit the behavior that resulted in a previous finding by a court or on or before July 1,
2006, by an animal control officer as authorized by local ordinance that it is a dangerous dog, provided
that its owner has been given notice of that finding.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-3, 5-10; Ord. No. 3137, § 1, 5-11-82; Ord. No. 84-192, § 1, 11-13-84; Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-
93; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 101497-7, § 1, 10-14-97; Ord. No. 060998-7, 6-23-98; Ord. No.
072605-7, § 2, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No. 082812-7, § 1, 8-28-12)
335 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 4 of 18
Sec. 5-22. Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, adopted December 5, 2006, amended the Code by repealing former § 5-
22 in its entirety. Former § 5-22 pertained to violations of this article, and derived from Ord. No. 41294-7,
adopted April 12, 1994.
Sec. 5-23. Dogs and cats deemed personal property; rights relating thereto.
(a) All dogs and cats in this county shall be deemed personal property and may be the subject of larceny and
malicious or unlawful trespass and the owners thereof may maintain any action for the killing of any such
dogs or cats, or injury thereto, or unlawful detention or use thereof, as in the case of other personal
property. The owner of any dog or cat which is injured or killed contrary to the provisions of this article by
any person shall be entitled to recover the value thereof or the damage done thereto in an appropriate
action at law from such person.
(b) The animal control police officers or other officer finding a stolen dog or cat or a dog or cat held or detained
contrary to law shall have authority to seize and hold such dog or cat pending action before a general district
court or other court. If no such action is instituted within seven (7) days, such officer shall deliver the dog or
cat to its owner. The presence of a dog or cat on the premises of a person other than its legal owner shall
raise no presumption of theft against the owner of such premises, and the animal control police officers may
take such dog or cat in charge and notify its legal owner to remove him. The legal owner of the dog or cat
shall pay the normal boarding fee established by section 5-29 for the keep of such dog or cat while in the
possession of the animal control police officers or other authorized agent of the county.
(Code 1971, § 5-6; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1,
12-16-25)
Sec. 5-24. Limitation on number kept per dwelling unit.
(a) The harboring or keeping of more than three (3) dogs over four (4) months of age per dwelling shall be
unlawful, unless a multiple dog permit has been issued pursuant to this article. The harboring or keeping of
more than six (6) cats over four (4) months of age, of which no more than two (2) may be fertile, per dwelling
shall be unlawful. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any dwelling which is part of an active
agricultural operation or usage as defined by the zoning ordinance for the county.
(b) As of July 26, 2005, allow a sixty-day period to register four (4) dogs if the dogs are owned currently and
upon the death of one (1) of the four (4) dogs, the homeowner would be allowed to maintain three (3) dogs
from that point forward.
(c) Any person participating in a dog foster adoption program sanctioned by the Regional Center for Animal Care
and Protection may be permitted to keep no more than four (4) dogs over four (4) months of age per
dwelling for a period of ninety (90) days, unless an extension is granted by the foster adoption program, so
long as the person is in compliance with all of the regulations in the foster adoption program.
(Ord. No. 3137, § 2, 5-11-82; Ord. No. 52290-7, § 1, 5-22-90; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 101497-7, §
1, 10-14-97; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 2, 7-26-05; Ord No. 111015-7, § 1, 11-10-15)
Sec. 5-25. Sanitary condition of premises where kept.
The structure or building in which any dogs are confined and the lot, compound or enclosure in which they
are penned shall be kept in such sanitary condition as not to cause offensive odors or attract flies or other insects.
336 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 5 of 18
(Code 1971, § 5-9)
Sec. 5-26. Nuisance prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for the owner or harborer of any dog, cat or other wild or domestic animal to cause or
permit such animal to perform, create or engage in any animal nuisance defined in section 5-21. Any animal found
acting in any way forbidden by this article shall hereby be declared a nuisance and its owner or harborer shall be
subject to the penalties provided by section 5-34.
(Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, adopted July 27, 1993, repealed former § 5-26, relative to vicious dogs,
and enacted new §§ 5-26.1—5-26.5 pertaining to similar subject matter. The provisions of former § 5-26
derived from Code 1971, § 5-10.1 and Ord. No. 84-192, § 1, adopted Nov. 13, 1984. Subsequently, Ord. No.
41294-7, § 1, adopted Apr. 12, 1994, enacted new provisions as herein set out.
Sec. 5-26.1. Dangerous dogs; vicious dog; penalties; procedures.
(a) Dangerous dog. It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or
permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known
to be a dangerous dog, as defined by section 5-21, except in strict compliance with section 5-26.3 of this
Code. If any dog previously declared to be a dangerous dog bites a human being or attacks a human being
causing bodily injury, such owner shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
(b) Vicious dog. It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or
permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known
to be a vicious dog, as defined by section 5-21. If, after hearing evidence, the court finds any dog to be a
vicious dog, the court shall, in addition to any other penalties imposed, order the animal control police
officer to euthanize the dog.
(c) Procedures.
(1) Any animal control police and/or police officer who has reason to believe that a canine or canine
crossbreed within the county is a dangerous dog or vicious dog shall apply to a magistrate within the
county for the issuance of a summons requiring the owner or custodian, if known, to appear before the
county general district court at a specified time. The summons shall advise the owner or custodian of
the nature of the proceeding and the matters at issue. When a summons issued pursuant to this
section, the animal control police officer and/or police officer may, in his discretion, confine the dog
until such time as evidence shall be heard and a verdict rendered. Otherwise, the owner or custodian
shall confine the dog until the evidence shall be heard and a verdict rendered. The court may, through
its contempt power, compel the owner, custodian or harborer of any dog to produce it for the animal
control police officer and/or police officer. In the event any dog is found to be a dangerous dog or a
vicious dog, the owner or custodian of such dog shall be responsible for payment to the county of any
expenses of impounding and keeping the dog pending disposition of the case at the rate prescribed by
the county board of supervisors.
(2) If, after hearing the evidence, the court finds that the animal is a dangerous dog, the court shall order
the animal's owner to comply with sections 5-26.2 and 5.26.3 of the county code. If, after hearing the
evidence, the court finds that the animal is a vicious dog, the court shall order the animal euthanized in
accordance with state law.
(d) If the owner or custodian of an animal found to be a dangerous dog is a minor, the custodial parent or legal
guardian shall be responsible for complying with all requirements of this chapter.
337 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 6 of 18
(e) All fees collected pursuant to this section, less the costs incurred by the county in producing and distributing
the licenses and tags required by ordinance, shall be paid into a special dedicated fund for the purpose of
paying the expenses of any training courses required by animal control police officers under section 3.2-6556
of the Code of Virginia or its successor.
(Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 060998-7, 6-23-98; Ord. No.
120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-26.2. Licensure of dangerous dog.
(a) The owner or custodian of any dog found by a court to be a dangerous dog shall, within forty-five (45) days
of such finding, obtain a dangerous dog registration certificate or license from the treasurer by paying the
fee required by section 5-44 of this Code. The treasurer shall provide the owner or custodian with a
uniformly designed tag which identifies the dog as a dangerous dog. The owner or custodian shall affix the
tag to the dog's collar and ensure that the dog wears collar and tag at all times. All certificates or licenses
issued pursuant to this section shall be renewed annually as required by section 5-44 of this Code. The
animal control police officer shall provide a copy of the dangerous dog registration certificate or license and
verification of the owner's compliance with the requirements of this article to the state veterinarian.
(b) No dangerous dog license shall be issued until the applicant has filed with the treasurer the insurance
certificate required by section 5-26.3(c). The treasurer shall immediately forward a copy of such certificate to
the police department and the county's risk manager for review and filing. The risk manager shall
immediately notify the animal control police officer and/or police officer of any noncompliance with the
provisions of section 5-26.3(c) of which the risk manager becomes aware.
(c) Any license or renewal required to be obtained under this section shall only be issued to persons eighteen
(18) years of age or older who present satisfactory evidence:
(1) Of the dog's current rabies vaccination;
(2) That the provisions of subsections (a), (b) and (d) of section 5-26.3 have been complied with; and
(3) That the animal has been neutered or spayed.
(Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 060998-7, 6-23-98; Ord. No.
120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No. 092413-6, § 1, 9-24-13; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-26.3. Keeping dangerous dogs; conditions.
It shall be unlawful for any owner of any dangerous dog to own, keep, or harbor any such dog within the
county except in compliance with each of the following conditions and specifications:
(a) Any dangerous dog shall be securely confined indoors or, if kept outdoors, shall be kept in a securely
enclosed and locked pen or structure adequate to confine the dog and located upon the premises of
the owner of the dog. Any such pen or structure shall have secure sides and a secure top and, if it has
no bottom secured to the sides, the sides shall be imbedded into the ground no less than two (2) feet.
Such pen or structures shall provide any such dog with adequate space and protection from the
elements and shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
(b) The owner of any dangerous dog shall display two (2) signs on his property stating: "Dangerous Dog on
Premises." One (1) sign shall be posted at the front of the property, and the second sign shall be posted
at the rear of the property. Each sign shall be capable of being read from a distance of fifty (50) feet.
338 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 7 of 18
(c) The owner of any dangerous dog shall procure and maintain public liability insurance in the amount of
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) insuring the owner for any injury or damage caused by
such dog. The owner shall maintain a valid policy and certificate of insurance issued by the insurance
carrier or agent as to the coverage required by this subsection at the premises where such dog is kept
and shall, upon request, display such policy and certificate to any animal control police officer or police
officer.
(d) The owner of any dangerous dog shall have such dog permanently identified by means of a tattoo on
an inside thigh, and the owner of any dangerous dog shall provide the animal control police officer with
a color photograph of the dog taken within the last twelve (12) months, suitable for use in identifying
the dog.
(e) If any dangerous dog is taken off the property of its owner, such dog shall be muzzled and restrained
by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length, and such dog shall at all times be
kept under the control of a responsible person. Such muzzle shall be constructed in such a manner that
it will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal, but such that it will not cause injury to the dog
or interfere with its vision or respiration.
(f) The owner of any dangerous dog shall notify the police department immediately once such dog is
discovered to be loose or missing; if such dog has attacked or wounded a human being or another
animal; or if such dog has been sold, leased, given away, died, or custody has been transferred to
another person for more than forty-eight (48) hours. If such dog has been sold, leased, given away, or
custody has been so transferred, the owner shall provide the police department with the name,
address, and telephone number of the new owner, lessee, or custodian who shall be required to
comply with the conditions of this section if the dog is kept within the county. If the owner of a
dangerous dog moves such dog to a different address, such owner shall notify the police department of
such fact and the new address within twenty-four (24) hours.
(g) The animal control police officer and/or police officer shall be permitted the right to inspect the
enclosure in which any dangerous dog is kept at any time.
(h) In addition to the conditions and specifications established by this section with respect to dangerous
dogs, the owner of any dangerous dog shall meet all other requirements established by this article for
keeping any dog.
(i) The animal control police officer and/or police officer shall have the right to seize and impound the dog
if any of the conditions and specifications established by this section for the keeping of a dangerous
dog are not being met.
(Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No.
121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-26.4. Violations.
It shall be a Class 1 misdemeanor for the owner of any dog which has caused a wound to any person to
conceal or cause to be concealed such dog from any animal control police officer or police officer.
(Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-26.5. Exceptions.
(a) No dog shall be deemed or declared to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog if the threat, wound, injury or
damage was caused by any person who, at the time, was (1) assaulting the owner of the dog, (2) committing
339 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 8 of 18
a willful trespass or tort upon the premises of the owner of the dog, or (3) provoking, abusing, or assaulting
the dog or can be shown to have repeatedly provoked, tormented, or abused the dog at other times.
(b) No animal which, at the time of the acts complained of, was responding to pain or injury, or was protecting
itself, its kennel, its offspring, or its owner's property, shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog.
(c) This section shall have no application to any dog owned by a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency.
(d) No dog shall be found to be a dangerous dog or a vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed.
(Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93)
Sec. 5-27. Barking or howling dogs.
(a) The harboring or keeping of any dog that causes any sound or noise such that it is plainly audible at least
once a minute for ten (10) consecutive minutes:
(1) Inside the confines of the dwelling unit, house or apartment of another; or
(2) At fifty (50) or more feet from the animal; is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be
unlawful.
(b) A dog that is in violation of subsection (a) may be impounded by an animal control police officer or other law
enforcement officer under the following circumstances:
(1) If, after reasonable efforts by the officer, the keeper of the animal cannot be located and the noise in
violation of this section persists,
(2) If, after being advised by an officer that the dog is in violation of this section, the keeper of the dog is
unwilling or unable to take steps to stop the dog from barking, or
(3) The keeper of a specific dog has been notified on three (3) or more separate occasions that the dog
was in violation of this section, and the officer again observes the dog to be in violation of this section.
The disposition of any such dog shall be in accordance with section 5-29.
(c) It is requested, upon the first instance that a specific dog creates a public nuisance (as set forth in subsection
(a) above), that the affected citizen first contact the dog's keeper, prior to contacting the county police
department, to attempt to resolve objections with the keeper.
(d) An animal control police officer or other law enforcement officer may institute civil proceedings against any
person that is in violation of this section. Citizens may also institute their own civil proceedings to resolve
barking dog problems.
(Code 1971, § 5-10.2; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 092822-5, § 1, 9-28-22; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, §
1, 12-16-25)
Cross reference(s)—Noise generally, § 13-3.
Sec. 5-28. Running at large—Prohibited.
(a) It shall be unlawful for the owner of any domestic or feral dog, exotic or poisonous animal or exotic bird or
poultry to permit such domestic or feral dog, exotic or poisonous animal or exotic bird or poultry to run at
large in the county at any time during any month of the year.
340 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 9 of 18
(b) This section shall not apply to a companion animal engaged in lawful hunting in open season or when being
trained or exercised and accompanied by its owner or custodian or under the immediate control of its owner
or custodian.
(Code 1971, § 5-10; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06)
Sec. 5-29. Same—Impoundment.
(a) It shall be the duty of the animal control police officer or other officer to cause any dog or animal found
running at large in violation of section 5-28 or any dog or cat creating an animal nuisance in the presence of
the officer as defined by section 5-21 to be caught and confined in the county animal shelter. Every
reasonable effort shall be made on the part of the animal control police officer or other officer to determine
the ownership of an animal so confined if the animal has an identifying collar, tag, license or tattooed
identification or electronic implant and to notify the owner of its whereabouts. Such officer shall make a
reasonable effort within forty-eight (48) hours of the animal's confinement to notify any owner who may be
readily identified of such confinement.
(b) A dog or cat or other domestic animal or companion animal confined under this section or other lawful
authority may be claimed by the rightful owner after displaying proof of ownership, a current dog or cat
license and proof of current rabies inoculation of the animal. No dog, cat, or companion animal shall be
released to any person claiming ownership, unless such license and proof have been displayed.
(c) An owner claiming his animal pursuant to subsection (b) above shall be required to pay the actual expense
incurred by the county in keeping the animal confined. Such payment shall be made to the custodial officer
at the time of the release of the animal. It shall be the duty of the custodial officer to furnish the owner with
a written receipt for such payment, in a form and manner approved by the board of supervisors. Such officer
shall keep a carbon copy of all such receipts in a bound book, which shall be turned over to the county
treasurer when the book is filled and shall be subject to audit by representatives of the board of supervisors
whenever requested. In the event any domestic animal confined at county expense is sold, an amount equal
to the actual expense incurred by the county in keeping the animal confined shall be deducted from the sale
proceeds as funds payable pursuant to this subsection. Any funds collected pursuant to this subsection shall
be remitted to the police department's animal impoundment account. No payment made under this
subsection shall relieve the owner from prosecution for violating section 5-28.
(d) Any animal confined pursuant to this section shall be kept for a period of not less than five (5) days,
commencing on the day immediately following the day such animal is initially confined, unless sooner
claimed by its rightful owner or such owner has surrendered all property rights in such animal, before it may
be disposed of. Any animal whose identity may be readily identified shall be kept for an additional period of
five (5) days, or a total of ten (10) days, before it may be disposed of or delivered to an individual for
adoption and payment of all required fees.
(e) A pickup fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) for the first offense, thirty-five dollars ($35.00) for the second
offense, and fifty dollars ($50.00) for the third offense shall be imposed in addition to the normal board fee
of eight and three quarters dollars ($8.75) per day when any dog or cat or domestic animal is claimed by its
owner or custodian. All such fees shall constitute a civil debt owing to the county and may be enforced
against such owner or custodian by civil warrant, suit or action at law or other legal proceeding.
(f) Feral dogs or cats not bearing identification which exhibits behavior that poses a risk of physical injury to any
person confining the animal will be confined for a period of not less than three (3) days before being
euthanized in accordance with section 3.2-6546 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
341 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:05 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 10 of 18
(Code 1971, §§ 5-11, 5-26; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 52290-7, § 1, 5-22-90; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94;
Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 012699-14, § 1, 1-26-99; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No.
121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-30. Confinement of female dogs while in season.
Every female dog suspected of being in season shall be confined by the owner to a building or structure
properly enclosed, so as to obscure such dog from public view while such dog is known to be in season.
(Code 1971, § 5-13)
Sec. 5-31. Killing, injuring, etc., livestock or poultry—Generally.
(a) It shall be the duty of the animal control police officer or other officer, if he finds a dog in the act of killing,
injuring, worrying or chasing livestock or poultry, to kill such dog forthwith, whether such dog bears a tag or
not, and any person finding a dog committing any of the depredations mentioned in this section shall have
the right to kill such dog on sight.
(b) The general district court or any other court shall have the power to order the community service officer or
other officer to kill any dog known to be a confirmed livestock or poultry killer, and any dog killing poultry for
the third time shall be considered a confirmed poultry killer.
(c) If any person, including the animal control police officer, has reason to believe that any dog is killing livestock
or committing any of the depredations mentioned in this section, he shall apply to a magistrate of the
county, who shall issue a warrant requiring the owner or custodian, if known, to appear before the judge of
the general district court at the time and place named therein, at which time evidence shall be heard, and if
it shall appear that such dog is a livestock killer or has committed any of the depredations mentioned in this
section, the dog shall be ordered killed immediately, which the community service officer or other officer
designated by the judge of the general district court to act, shall do.
(Code 1971, § 5-7; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
State law reference(s)—Dogs killing, injuring, etc., other animals, Code of Virginia, § 3.2-6552.
Sec. 5-32. Same—Investigation of claims against county.
(a) The animal control police officer shall conduct an investigation into any claim made pursuant to section 3.2-
6553 of the Code of Virginia for livestock or poultry killed or injured by a dog prior to the payment of such
claim, to determine if the claimant has exhausted all legal remedies available to him against the owner of the
dog, if known, prior to making such claim to the board of supervisors.
(b) For the purposes of this section, "exhaustion" shall mean a judgment against the owner of the dog upon
which an execution has been returned unsatisfied.
(Code 1971, § 5-13.1; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-27-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-33. Disposal of dead companion animal.
The owner of any companion animal, poultry, or livestock which has died from disease or other cause shall
forthwith cremate or bury the same. If, after notice, the owner fails to do so, any judge of the general district court
shall direct the animal control police officer or other officer to bury or cremate the companion animal, poultry or
livestock and he may recover, on behalf of the county, from the owner his actual cost for the cremation or burial
342 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 11 of 18
and a reasonable fee for this service. All sums recovered under this section shall be deposited to the community
service animal impoundment account.
In addition to recovery of costs and fees, any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a
Class 4 misdemeanor.
(Code 1971, § 5-8; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No. 092711-2, § 1, 9-
27-11; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Cross reference(s)—County solid waste collectors not to pick up dead animals, § 20-27.
Sec. 5-34. Penalties.
A violation of any provision of this article and any "animal nuisance" as defined in section 5-21 may also be
corrected, removed or abated through an appropriate action at law or suit in equity by any person suffering injury
or damage therefrom.
Except as otherwise specifically provided, the penalties for violations of all sections of this chapter shall be as
follows:
(1) For the first offense, a fine of not less than seventy-five dollars ($75.00) nor more than one hundred
fifty dollars ($150.00).
(2) For a second offense within a consecutive twelve-month period, a fine of not less than one hundred
fifty dollars ($150.00) nor more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00).
(3) For a third and all subsequent offenses, a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) nor
more than three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00).
(4) The judge trying case may order any animal permanently removed from the county within twenty-four
(24) hours of such order.
(Ord. No. 52290-7, § 1, 5-22-90; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06; Ord. No. 092822-
5, § 1, 9-28-22)
Sec. 5-35. Responsible animal care.
It shall be unlawful for any owner or harborer of a domestic animal to fail to provide the following for his
animal:
(1) A sufficient quantity of good and wholesome food and water and adequate exercise;
(2) Adequate protection and shelter from the weather;
(3) Veterinary care when needed to prevent suffering or disease transmission;
(4) Adequate care, treatment, and transportation.
(Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-36. Animal control police officers; duties and responsibilities.
There is hereby created the position of animal control police officer within the county police department.
The animal control police officer or his agent or any law enforcement officer shall have the following powers:
343 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 12 of 18
(1) May enter upon private property to apprehend any domestic animal which is in violation of any
provision of this chapter or to apprehend any animal which presents an immediate threat to the safety,
health or welfare of any person, including an animal suspected of being infected with rabies;
(2) May enter upon private property to investigate complaints of inhumane or lack of responsible animal
care;
(3) May seize, impound or dispose of any vicious or dangerous animal of any kind when necessary for the
protection of any person or animal; and
(4) May perform all other acts necessary to carry out the requirements of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, Dec. 16, 2025, repealed the former § 5-36, and enacted a new § 5-36 as set out herein.
The former § 5-36 pertained to community service officers; duties and responsibilities, and derived from Ord.
No. 41294-7, § 1, April 12, 1994; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, Dec. 17, 1996.
Sec. 5-37. Abandonment of animal; penalty.
No person shall abandon or dump any animal. Violation of this section is a Class 3 misdemeanor. Nothing in
this section shall be construed to prohibit the release of an animal by its owner to a pound, animal shelter, or
other releasing agency.
(Ord. No. 120506-2, § 1, 12-5-06)
Sec. 5-38. Standards for residential chicken keeping.
The keeping of female chickens (hens) shall be permitted in non-agriculturally zoned areas of the county
subject to the following standards:
(1) The principal use of the property is a single-family dwelling.
(2) The owner of the chickens must reside on the property on which the chickens are kept.
(3) Chickens shall be kept within a predator-resistant coop or chicken enclosure at all times and shall not
be permitted to run at large.
(4) Coops and chicken enclosures shall be setback at least ten (10) feet from side and rear property lines
and at least thirty-five (35) feet from any residential dwelling on an adjacent lot. Coops and chicken
enclosures shall also be located behind the front building line of the principal structure.
(5) Coops shall provide at least two (2) square feet of interior space per chicken and chicken enclosures
shall provide at least ten (10) square feet of exterior space per chicken with a maximum total area of
two hundred fifty (250) square feet for both the coop and chicken enclosure. Neither the coop nor
chicken enclosure shall exceed ten (10) feet in height.
(6) Coops and chicken enclosures shall be securely constructed, well-ventilated and kept in a clean, dry
and sanitary condition at all times.
(7) Provision shall be made for the storage and removal of chicken waste (manure). Such waste shall not
create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining property owners.
(8) All chicken feed or other material intended for consumption by chickens shall be kept in containers
impenetrable by rodents, insects or predators.
(9) The keeping of roosters, capons, and crowing hens is prohibited.
344 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 13 of 18
(10) The outdoor slaughtering of chickens is prohibited.
(11) The maximum number of female chickens (hens) that may be kept shall be as follows:
(Ord. No. 082812-7, § 1, 8-28-12; Ord. No. 092215-8, § 1, 9-22-15)
Secs. 5-39, 5-40. Reserved.
DIVISION 2. LICENSE
Sec. 5-41. Required.
It shall be unlawful for any person to own, keep, hold, or harbor a dog or cat four (4) months old or over in
this county, unless such dog or cat is currently licensed under the provisions of this division. Such a license shall be
valid only as long as the animal's owner resides in Roanoke County and the animal's rabies vaccination is kept
current.
(Code 1971, § 5-14; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord.
No. 111924-3.c, § 1, 11-19-24)
State law reference(s)—Code of Virginia, § 3.2-6530
Sec. 5-42. License year.
(a) Dog kennel and dangerous dog licenses shall be issued for each calendar year, from January 1 through
December 31.
(b) All other animal licenses issued on or after January 1, 2025, shall be "lifetime" licenses.
(Code 1971, § 5-14; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 111924-3.c, §1, 11-19-24)
Sec. 5-43. Application; applicant to be county resident.
(a) Any resident of this county may obtain a dog or cat license by making oral or written application to the
county treasurer, accompanied by the amount of the license tax and the certificate of vaccination required
by section 5-48. The treasurer shall have authority to license only dogs or cats of resident owners or
custodians who reside within this county and may require information to this effect from any applicant.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make a false statement in order to secure a dog or cat license to which
he is not entitled.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-17, 5-27; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
345 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 14 of 18
Sec. 5-44. Tax imposed.
(a) Commencing on January 1, 2025, a "lifetime" license tax is hereby imposed on dogs or cats required to be
licensed under this division in the following amounts (prior to January 1, 2025, licenses were issued for each
animal on an annual or three-year basis):
(1) The license tax on dogs, for as long as the owner owns the dog, shall be twenty dollars ($20.00).
(2) The license tax on cats, for as long as the owner owns the cat, shall be fifteen dollars ($15.00).
Upon transfer of a dog or a cat to a new owner, the new owner shall likewise pay the license tax.
(b) An annual license tax is hereby imposed on kennels and dangerous dogs required to be licensed under this
division in the following amounts:
(1) Kennel for up to twenty (20) dogs: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(2) Kennel for up to fifty (50) dogs: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00).
(3) Dangerous dog, as declared by any general district court or circuit court of this commonwealth or by an
animal control police officer pursuant to section 5-26.1(c)(2) above: One hundred fifty dollars ($150.00)
(in addition to the other applicable fees herein). All certificates shall be updated and renewed for a fee
of eighty-five dollars ($85.00) and in the same manner as the initial certificate was obtained (in
addition to the other applicable fees herein).
(c) No license tax shall be levied under this section on any dog that is trained and serves as a guide dog for a
blind person or that is trained and serves as a hearing dog for a deaf or hearing impaired person. As used
herein, the term "hearing dog" means a dog trained to alert its owner, by touch, to sounds of danger and
sounds to which the owner should respond.
(d) In no event shall the treasurer pay any refund of the license tax imposed by this section.
(Code 1971, § 5-14; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 52290-7, § 1, 5-22-90; Ord. No. 72793-7, § 1, 7-27-93; Ord.
No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 060998-7, 6-23-98; Ord. No. 042313-7, § 1, 4-23-13; Ord. No. 111924-3.c, § 1,
11-19-24; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-45. When and where tax due and payable.
The license tax on dogs or cats shall be due and payable at the office of the county treasurer as follows:
(1) Within thirty (30) days after the dog or cat reaches four (4) months of age or within thirty (30) days of
acquiring a dog or cat four (4) months of age.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-14, 5-15; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94;
Ord. No. 111924-3.c, § 1, 11-19-24)
Sec. 5-46. Failure to pay tax when due.
It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog or cat to fail to pay the tax imposed by this division when the
same is due. Payment of such tax subsequent to a summons to appear before a court for failure to do so within the
time required by this division shall not operate to relieve such owner from the penalties provided for such failure.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-22, 5-27; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 111924-3.c, § 1, 11-19-24)
346 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 15 of 18
Sec. 5-47. Concealing or harboring dog or cat upon which tax not paid.
It shall be unlawful for any person to conceal or harbor any dog or cat on which the license tax imposed by
this division has not been paid.
(Code 1971, § 5-13; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-48. Issuance, composition and contents.
(a) Upon receipt of a proper application and the prescribed license tax, the county treasurer shall issue a dog or
cat license; provided, however, that such license shall not be issued unless the applicant presents a
certificate meeting the requirements of section 5-67 and showing that the dog or cat in question has been
vaccinated against rabies as required by section 5-66. When the license is issued, such certificate shall be so
marked and returned to the dog's or cat's owner.
(b) A dog or cat license shall consist of a license tax receipt and a tag made of twenty-gauge metal or other
suitable material in a rectangular shape one-half inch in width and two (2) inches in length, with a one-eighth
inch hole at each end.
(c) The receipt issued pursuant to this section shall have recorded thereon the name and address of the owner
or custodian of the dog or cat, the date of payment, the serial number of the tag and whether the license is
for a dog or cat, or for a kennel or a dangerous dog.
(d) The license tag for a dog or cat shall be stamped or otherwise permanently marked, showing: "Roanoke
County, Va. Dog Tag," or "Roanoke County, Va. Cat Tag," and a serial number.
(e) The license tag for a kennel shall consist of a license receipt and a tag made of 20-gauge metal or other
suitable material two and one-half (2½) inches in diameter, stamped or otherwise permanently marked,
showing "Roanoke County, Va. Kennel Tag," the calendar year, or such longer period, for which issued, the
number of dogs and a serial number.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-16, 5-18; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 111924-3.c, § 1, 11-19-
24)
Sec. 5-49. Preservation and exhibition of license receipt.
A dog or cat license receipt shall be carefully preserved by the person to whom it is issued and exhibited
promptly on request for inspection by the animal control police officer or any other officer.
(Code 1971, § 5-25; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1,
12-16-25)
Sec. 5-50. Tag to be worn by dog; exceptions.
(a) A dog license tag shall be securely fastened to a substantial collar by the owner or custodian of the dog and
worn by such dog. It shall be unlawful for the owner or custodian to permit any licensed dog four (4) months
old or over to run at large at any time without a license tag.
(b) The owner of a dog may remove the collar and license tag required by this section when the dog is engaged
in lawful hunting; when the dog is competing in a dog show; when the dog has a skin condition which would
be exacerbated by the wearing of a collar; when the dog is confined; or when the dog is under the immediate
control of its owner.
347 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 16 of 18
(c) Any dog or cat not wearing a collar bearing a license tag of the proper calendar year shall prima facie be
deemed to be unlicensed, and in any proceeding under this article, the burden of proof of the fact that such
dog or cat has been licensed or is otherwise not required to bear a tag at the time shall be on the owner of
the dog or cat.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-23, 5-25; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-51. Unlawful removal of tag.
It shall be unlawful for any person, except the owner or custodian, to remove a legally acquired license tag
from a dog or cat.
(Code 1971, § 5-13; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-52. Duplicate tags.
If a dog or cat license tag shall become lost, destroyed or stolen, the owner or custodian shall at once apply
to the county treasurer for a duplicate license tag, presenting the original license receipt. Upon affidavit of the
owner or custodian before the treasurer that the original license tag has been lost, destroyed or stolen, he shall
issue a duplicate license tag, which the owner or custodian shall immediately affix to the collar of the dog or cat.
The treasurer shall endorse the number of the duplicate and the date issued on the face of the original license
receipt. The fee for a duplicate tag shall be one dollar ($1.00).
(Code 1971, § 5-24; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-53. Records of licenses sold.
A list of all dog or cat licenses and kennel licenses sold shall be made in triplicate, consecutively numbered,
and showing to whom issued; residence address; magisterial district; tag number; year ending; day, month and
year issued; and the signature of the county treasurer. The original copy shall be delivered to the dog or cat owner,
the second copy shall be retained by the treasurer and the third copy shall be delivered to the animal control
police officer unit of the police department.
(Code 1971, § 5-19; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1,
12-16-25)
Sec. 5-54. Disposition of unsold tags.
Unsold dog and cat license tags for the preceding calendar year shall be disposed of by the county treasurer
after verification by a certified public accountant employed by the board of supervisors to audit the records and
accounts of the county for the fiscal year next ending.
(Code 1971, § 5-21; Ord. No. 41294-7, § 1, 4-12-94)
Sec. 5-55. Special provisions as to kennel licenses.
(a) The owner of a kennel shall securely fasten the license tag issued under this division to the kennel enclosure
in full view and keep one (1) of the identification plates provided therewith attached to the collar of each dog
authorized to be kept enclosed in the kennel. Any identification plates not so in use shall be kept by the
owner or custodian and promptly shown to any animal control police officer or other officer upon request. A
348 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 17 of 18
kennel dog shall not be permitted to stray beyond the limits of the enclosure, but this shall not prohibit
removing dogs therefrom temporarily while under the control of the owner or custodian for the purpose of
exercising, hunting, breeding, trial or show. A kennel shall not be operated in such manner as to defraud the
county of the license tax applying to dogs which cannot be legally covered thereunder or to in any manner
violate other provisions of this article.
(b) If a kennel dog is found running and roaming at large at any time of the year in violation of any provision of
this article, the kennel license may be revoked, if the violation appears to the trial court to have resulted
from carelessness or negligence on the part of the owner, who shall thereupon be required to secure an
individual license for each dog.
(Code 1971, § 5-27; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Secs. 5-56—5-65. Reserved.
DIVISION 3. RABIES CONTROL1
Sec. 5-66. Vaccination required.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to own, keep, hold or harbor any dog or cat over the age of four (4)
months within the county, unless the dog or cat has been vaccinated with a vaccine licensed by the United
States Department of Agriculture for use in that species within a period of the immediately preceding thirty-
six (36) months. Such animals shall continue to receive rabies vaccinations so as to not allow their immunity
to expire. If a license has been issued to any dog or cat pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and the
dog's or cat's immunity to rabies expires, the animal's license shall become void within thirty (30) days of the
expiration of immunity. Following such invalidation, the animal's owner or keeper must thereafter provide
proof of current vaccination to the treasurer and again pay the tax amount in order to reinstate the license.
(b) Any person transporting a dog or cat four (4) months of age or over into the county from some other
jurisdiction shall be required to comply with this section within thirty (30) days after bringing the dog or cat
into the county.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-28, 5-29; Ord. No. 51287-4, § 1, 5-12-87; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88; Ord. No. 111924-3.c, §
1, 11-19-24)
Sec. 5-67. Vaccination certificate.
At the time of vaccination of a dog or cat pursuant to section 5-66, a certificate shall be issued to the owner
of the dog or cat, which certificate shall be properly executed and signed by the supervising veterinarian on the
premises, and shall certify that the dog or cat has been vaccinated as required by section 5-66. The certificate shall
show the date of vaccination, a brief description of the dog or cat, and its sex and breed, and the name of the
owner of the dog or cat.
(Code 1971, §§ 5-16, 5-30; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 51287-4, § 1, 5-12-87; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88;
Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96)
1State law reference(s)—Rabies inoculation of dogs and domesticated cats, Code of Virginia, § 3.2-6521.
349 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:06 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 18 of 18
Sec. 5-68. Impoundment of unvaccinated dogs or cats.
(a) Any dog or cat found in the county which is not vaccinated as required in division shall be impounded by the
animal control police officer or other officer. The dog or cat may be returned to its owner, upon proof of
ownership, vaccination of the dog or cat, and payment of the cost of impounding the dog or cat. Such
payment shall not relieve the owner from prosecution for violating section 5-66.
(b) Any animal so impounded shall be held for the number of days required by subsection (d) of section 5-29
above and disposed of in accordance with that section if not claimed by its owner.
(Code 1971, § 5-30; Ord. No. 2135, 9-26-78; Ord. No. 51287-4, § 1, 5-12-87; Ord. No. 72688-11, § 1, 7-26-88; Ord.
No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Sec. 5-69. Vaccination clinics.
The board of supervisors may provide for clinics for the vaccination of dogs and cats under the supervision of
the animal control police officer and the health director and fix fees to be charged for services rendered at such
clinics.
(Code 1971, § 5-31; Ord. No. 51287-4, § 1, 5-12-87; Ord. No. 121796-12.a, § 1, 12-17-96; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1,
12-16-25)
Sec. 5-70. Quarantine in event of rabies epidemic.
When, in the judgment of the health director, an emergency shall be deemed to exist in the county or any
section thereof due to a widespread rabies epidemic, the health director may, for the protection of the public
health, declare a quarantine in the county or such section thereof as may be affected and restrict all dogs and cats
to the owners' premises or to the immediate custody of a responsible person for the duration of such emergency
as it is set forth.
(Code 1971, § 5-32; Ord. No. 51287-4, § 1, 5-12-87)
Sec. 5-71. Quarantine in event of animal bites.
At the discretion of the director of a local health department, any animal which has bitten a person shall be
confined under competent observation for ten (10) days, unless the animal develops active symptoms of rabies or
expires before that time. A seriously injured or sick animal may be humanely euthanized as provided in section 3.2-
6546 of the Code of Virginia and its head sent to the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services of the
Department of General Services, or the local health department, for evaluation.
(Ord. No. 11988-7, § 1, 11-9-88; Ord. No. 121625-9.e, § 1, 12-16-25)
Secs. 5-72—5-90. Reserved.
350 of 392
PART I - CODE OF THE COUNTY
Chapter 13 - OFFENSES—MISCELLANEOUS
ARTICLE II. NOISE
Roanoke County, Virginia, Code of Ordinances Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:13 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 1 of 4
ARTICLE II. NOISE
Sec. 13-16. Short title.
This article shall be known as the "Noise Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, Virginia."
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92)
Sec. 13-17. Declaration of policy.
It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the County of Roanoke to promote an environment for its
citizens free from excessive noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare or degrades the quality of life within
Roanoke County.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92)
Sec. 13-18. Definitions.
The following words and phrases, when used in this article shall have the meaning assigned to them in this
section.
Emergency work shall mean work made necessary to restore property, public or private, to a safe condition
following a state of emergency or a local emergency as defined by the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency
Services and Disaster Law of 1973, Chapter 3.2 of Title 44 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or its
successor, or work required to protect persons or property from immediate exposure to danger, including work
performed by the Western Virginia Water Authority, the Town of Vinton Public Works department, or by public
service companies when emergency inspection, repair of facilities or restoration of services is required for the
immediate health, safety or welfare of the community.
Instrument, machine or device means and refers to any musical instrument, drum, radio, phonograph,
compact disc player, cassette tape player, MP3 player, video player, amplifier or any other machine or device for
producing, reproducing or amplification of sound.
Motor vehicle shall mean a self-propelled vehicle including passenger cars, trucks, truck-trailers, semitrailers,
campers, racing vehicles, and any motorcycles (including, but not limited to, motor scooters, mini-bikes, all-terrain
vehicles and three-wheelers) as defined in section 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia.
Noise disturbance means any sound which (a) endangers or injures the safety or health of any person; (b)
annoys or disturbs humans and which causes or tends to cause an adverse psychological or physiological effect on
humans; or (c) endangers or injures personal or real property.
Person shall mean any individual, corporation, cooperative, partnership, firm, association, trust, estate,
private institution, group, agency or any legal successor, representative, agent or agency thereof.
Plainly audible means any sound that can be heard clearly by a person using his or her unaided hearing
faculties. When music is involved, the detection of rhythmic bass tones shall be sufficient to be considered plainly
audible sound.
351 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:13 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 2 of 4
Public area means any real property owned by the government, including, but not limited to, public rights -of-
way, sidewalks, parks, and buildings.
Residential dwelling means any building or other structure in which one or more persons resides on a
permanent or temporary basis, including, but not limited to, houses, apartments, condominiums, hotels, and
motels.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 052510-13, § 1, 5-25-10)
Sec. 13-19. Exceptions from this article.
The provisions of this article shall not apply to:
(1) The emission of sound for the purpose of alerting persons to the existence of an emergency or to the
emission of sound in the performance of emergency work;
(2) Music, bells, chimes or other sounds which are emanating from a church, temple, synagogue or other
place of worship;
(3) Sound generated from school or county sponsored athletic or recreational events, including band
performances or practices, athletic contests or practices and other school-sponsored activities on the
grounds of public or private schools, colleges, or universities;
(4) Agricultural activities;
(5) Gardening, lawn care, tree maintenance or removal, and other landscaping activities, provided such
exemption shall terminate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day;
(6) Religious or political gatherings to the extent that those activities are protected by the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution;
(7) Sound generated by activities which are an official or approved part of any county or state approved or
licensed parade, festival or activity, provided such exemption shall terminate at 10:00 p.m.;
(8) Sound generated by commercial and industrial uses permitted in the underlying zoning districts or
sounds regulated by a special use permit, proffered condition, variance or approved by the zoning
administrator or which are normal, routine, necessary and in cidental to the uses permitted therein;
and
(9) Sound for which a waiver has been granted in accordance with section 13-23 of this article; and,
(10) Activities for which the regulation of noise has been preempted by federal law.
(11) Locomotives and other railroad equipment, and aircraft.
(12) Lawful discharge of firearms.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 081997-7, § 1, 8-19-97; Ord. No. 052510-13, § 1, 5-25-10)
Sec. 13-20. Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 052510-13, § 1, adopted May 25, 2010, amended the Code by repealing former § 13-20.
Former § 13-20 pertained to a general prohibition, and derived from Ord. No. 102792 -12, adopted October
27, 1992.
352 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:13 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 3 of 4
Sec. 13-21. Specific acts as noise disturbances.
The following acts are declared to be noise disturbances in violation of this article unless specifically
excepted in section 13-19.
(1) Engaging in, or operating or causing to be operated any equipment used in the construction, repair,
alteration or demolition of buildings, streets, roads, alleys or appurtenances thereto between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day.
(2) Repairing, rebuilding or modifying any motor vehicle or other mechanical equipment or device
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day in a manner so as to be plainly
audible at a distance of fifty (50) feet or more from the vehicle.
(3) Loading or unloading trucks outdoors within one hundred (100) yards of a residential dwelling between
the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day.
(4) Sounding the horn or warning device of a vehicle, except when necessary as a warning during the
operation of the vehicle.
(5) Operating or permitting the use or operation of any instrument, , machine or any other device for the
production of sound, at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible through partitions common to two (2)
residences within a building or plainly audible at fifty (50) feet or more from such device or its source.
(6) Using or operating a loudspeaker or other sound amplification devices in a fixed or movable position
exterior to any building, or mounted upon any motor vehicle or mounted in the interior of a building
with the intent of providing service to an exterior area for the purpose of commercial advertising,
giving instruction, information, directions, talks, addresses, lectures, or providing entertainment to any
persons or assemblage of persons on any private or public property, between the hours of 10:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m. the following day.
(7) Using or operating any motor vehicle without factory installed mufflers or their equivalent conforming
to sections 46.2-1047 and 46.1-1049 of the Code of Virginia, on any public street or road in the county
or on private property within a residential zoning district.
(8) Using a radio receiving set, an audio cassette player, a compact disc player, or other device for the
production of sound in a motor vehicle at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible at fifty (50) feet or
more from such vehicle.
(9) Failure to deactivate an alarm system plainly audible at fifty (50) feet or more from such alarm within
such reasonable time as is established by section 16-23 of this Code.
(10) The operation of a trash collection vehicle between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in such a
manner as to be plainly audible at any residence one hundred (100) or more yards away.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 052510-13, § 1, 5-25-10)
Sec. 13-22. Penalties.
(a) A violation of any provisions of this article shall constitute a class 3 misdemeanor. Each separate act on the
part of the person violating this article shall be deemed a separate offense, and each day a violation is
permitted to continue unabated shall constitute a separate offense. Any person who violates a provision of
this article within one (1) year after a previous conviction under this article shall be guilty of a class 2
misdemeanor.
353 of 392
Created: 2026-04-29 14:52:13 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)
Page 4 of 4
(b) The person operating or controlling a noise source shall be guilty of any violation caused by that source. If
that cannot be determined, any owner, tenant, resident or manager physically present on the property
where the violation is occurring is reputably presumed to be operating or controlling the noise source.
(c) In addition to and not in lieu of the penalties prescribed in this section, the county may apply to the circuit
court for an injunction against the continuing violation of any of the provisions of this article and may seek
any other remedy or relief authorized by law.
(d) Citizens of the county believing that a noise disturbance constituting a public nuisance exists may utilize the
procedure set forth in section 48-1 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, or any other legal civil or
criminal remedies that may be available to them.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 052510-13, § 1, 5-25-10)
Sec. 13-23. Undue hardship waiver.
(a) Any person responsible for a noise source may apply to the board of supervisors for a waiver, or partial
waiver, from the provisions of this article. The board of supervisors may grant such waiver, or partial waiver,
upon a finding that either of the following circumstances exists:
(1) The noise does not endanger the public health, safety or welfare; or
(2) Compliance with the provisions of this article from which a waiver is sought would produce serious
economic hardship without producing substantial benefit to the public.
(b) In determining whether to grant such waiver, the board of supervisors shall consider the time of day the
noise will occur, the duration of the noise, whether the noise is intermittent or continuous, its extensiveness,
the technical and economic feasibility of bringing the noise into conformance with this article and such other
matters as are reasonably related to the impact of the noise on the health, safety and welfare of the
community and the degree of hardship which may result from the enforcement of the provisions of this
article.
(c) Except as provided in (d) below, no waiver, or partial waiver, issued pursuant to this article shall be granted
for a period to exceed one (1) year, but any such waiver, or partial waiver may be renewed for successive like
periods if the board of supervisors shall find such renewal is justified after again applying the standards set
forth in this article. No renewal shall be granted except upon written application therefor.
(d) Applications for waivers for noise generated within commercial and industrial zoning districts shall be
considered by the board of supervisors based upon the criteria contained in (a) and (b) above, and upon the
extent to which the noise is necessary and incidental to the commercial and industrial use generating the
sound. In considering such waivers, the board may, but shall not be required to, impose a time limit on any
waiver granted.
(Ord. No. 102792-12, § 1, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 081997-7, § 1, 8-19-97)
Secs. 13-24—13-99. Reserved.
354 of 392
WARNING: This Message Is From an External Sender, Use Caution!
This message was sent from outside the Roanoke County email system.
Report Suspicious
From:Deirdre Rea
To:Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:[EXTERNAL] - Travis Bell application
Date:Monday, July 6, 2026 1:25:56 PM
To be included in paperwork for the Planning Commission as it relates to the statements I will be
making at the public hearing.
From: Deirdre Rea <docr83@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 1:11 PM
To: Deirdre Rea <docr83@outlook.com>
Subject: More kennel
355 of 392
356 of 392
Sent from my iPhone
357 of 392
358 of 392
359 of 392
Rebecca James, CZA | Zoning AdministratorPlanning Department5204 Bernard Drive | Roanoke, VA 24018(O) 540-772-2134 www.roanokecountyva.gov/planning
Rebecca James, CZA | Zoning AdministratorPlanning Department5204 Bernard Drive | Roanoke, VA 24018(O) 540-772-2134 www.roanokecountyva.gov/planning
From:Rebecca James
To:Philip G. Thompson; Skylar E. Camerlinck
Subject:RE: Zoning Violations
Date:Thursday, June 4, 2026 12:26:57 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
She said last 10 years!
From: Philip G. Thompson <PTHOMPSON@roanokecountyva.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 10:48 AM
To: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov>; Skylar E. Camerlinck
<SCAMERLINCK@roanokecountyva.gov>
Subject: RE: Zoning Violations
What was the time period?
From: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 9:52 AM
To: Philip G. Thompson <PTHOMPSON@roanokecountyva.gov>; Skylar E. Camerlinck
<SCAMERLINCK@roanokecountyva.gov>
Subject: FW: Zoning Violations
No dog barking complaints received – see below.
From: Brittni Money <BMONEY@roanokecountyva.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 7:15 AM
To: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov>
Subject: RE: Zoning Violations
Good Morning!
Rebecca James, CZA | Zoning AdministratorPlanning Department5204 Bernard Drive | Roanoke, VA 24018(O) 540-772-2134www.roanokecountyva.gov/planning
We haven’t had any barking dog complaints on Grubb Rd, Sugar Rum Ridge Rd, or Mason Knob
Trail.
Brittni Money | Crime Analyst
Police Department
5925 Cove Road | Roanoke, VA 24019
(O) 540-777-8698
www.roanokecountyva.gov/police
From: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 3:32 PM
To: Brittni Money <BMONEY@roanokecountyva.gov>
Subject: RE: Zoning Violations
Hi! I have a question/need help? Can you provide any information/complaints received related
to dog barking at 6754 Grubb Road?
Thank you!
Becky
From: Brittni Money <BMONEY@roanokecountyva.gov>
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 7:19 AM
To: Rebecca James <RJAMES@roanokecountyva.gov>
Subject: RE: Zoning Violations
Thank you!!
Brittni Money | Crime Analyst
Police Department
5925 Cove Road | Roanoke, VA 24019
(O) 540-777-8698
www.roanokecountyva.gov/police
Travis Bell
Request to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial
kennel on approximately 3.64 acres of land zoned AG-1,
Agricultural/Rural Low Density District
Board of Supervisors Public Hearing
July 14, 2026
361 of 392
Location Map2
362 of 392
Project Site
•6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb
Road
•2 Acres and 1.64 Acres
•Current Use: Single-Family
Dwelling and Vacant
•Proposed Use: Single-Family
Dwelling and Commercial
Kennel
•Request to obtain a Special Use
Permit to operate a
commercial kennel.
3
363 of 392
Community Outreach
•Prior to the June 2nd Planning Commission Public Hearing, approximately
15 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and tenants
containing information about the request.
•6 written comments were submitted to staff.
•Main concerns included:
•Noise
•Property values
•Traffic
•Environmental impacts
4
364 of 392
Background
•Planning Commission public hearing held June 2nd, 2026, on a similar
application
•Planning Commission voted recommend approval of the Special Use Permit
•15 citizens spoke at the public hearing
•All spoke in opposition of the petition
•Raised concerns about inaccurate and insufficient information in the
application, inconsistency with the Rural Village Future Land Use Designation
and the Zoning Ordinance purpose statement, the applications reference to
scalability and growth, more suitable commercial locations existing for this
use, the notification process, the geographical location of those who signed
the neighborhood support survey, traffic, road maintenance, privacy and
safety, the number of dog already receiving service, lack of inspections,
noise, property values, and public health.
5
365 of 392
Background
•There were concerns raised about whether the parcel
addressed 6754 Grubb Road was two (2) acres and would
comply with the use and design standards for commercial
kennels.
•The deeded acreage of 6754 Grubb Road is two (2) acres,
however a plat that was done more recently but has not been
recorded was submitted with the special use permit
application that shows the parcel as 1.984 acre.
•A revised application was submitted that includes both 6754
Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road to bring the acreage total to
approximately 3.64 acres and eliminate any issues when
applying for a commercial kennel license if the special use
permit request were approved.
6
366 of 392
Community Outreach
•Approximately 34 letters were mailed to adjoining property owners and
tenants and citizens who spoke at the June 2nd public hearing containing
information about the revised application.
•2 written comments were submitted to staff.
7
367 of 392
Aerial View8
368 of 392
Photographs9
369 of 392
Photographs10
370 of 392
Photographs11
371 of 392
Photographs12
372 of 392
Photographs13
373 of 392
Photographs14
374 of 392
Photographs15
375 of 392
Photographs16
376 of 392
Photographs17
377 of 392
18 Setbacks 378 of 392
19 Distance to Residences
6720 Grubb Road - 310 Feet
6885 Mason Knob Trail - 242 Feet
6907 Mason Knob Trail - 402 Feet
6788 Grubb Road - 608 Feet
6820 Sugar Rum Ridge Road – 435 Feet
6823 Trelawny Trail - 262 Feet
Distances from Proposed
Commercial Kennel to
Residences:
379 of 392
20 Zoning Background
•The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines kennel, commercial as
“The boarding, breeding, raising, grooming or training of two (2) or more dogs, cats, or
other household pets of any age not owned by the owner or occupant of the premises for
commercial gain.”
•Section 30-85-18 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, amended May
26th, 2026, contains use and design standards for kennel, commercial.
(A) General Standards:
1.Each commercial kennel shall install and operate a kennel silencer.
2.Animal waste shall [be] disposed of in a manner acceptable to the
department of health.
3.Crematoria or land burial of animals in association with a commercial
kennel shall be prohibited.
380 of 392
21 Zoning Background
(C) Additional standards in the AG-1, AR and AV districts:
1.The minimum area required for a commercial kennel shall be two (2)
acres.
2.All outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens associated
with a commercial kennel shall be set back a minimum of one hundred
(100) feet from any property line. The 100-foot setback may be reduced
by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors during the special
use permit process.
3.When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in
accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line
which adjoins the residential use type.
4.The site shall front on and have direct access to a publicly owned and
maintained street.
381 of 392
Services
•Boarding
•Daily average goal of 2 participants per day
•Two climate-controlled suites (approximately 275 total square feet) located in main home
•Suites can accommodate multiple dogs from same family
•Doggie Daycare
•Daily average goal of 5 -10 dogs per day
•1800 square foot common playground located between house and detached garage
•240 square foot detached garage for indoor area and kennels
•Grooming
•Weekly average goal of 3 baths
•Weekly average goal of 3 nail trimmings
Hours of Service
•Office Hours
•Monday - Saturday – 7:30 am to 6:00 pm
•Sunday – Closed
•Doggie Day Care
•Drop Off
•Monday - Saturday – 7:30 am to 9:00 am
•Sunday – Closed
•Pickup
•Monday - Saturday – 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm
•Sunday – Closed
•Boarding
•Drop Off
•Monday - Saturday – 7:30 am to 9:00 am
•Sunday – Closed
•Pickup
•Monday - Sunday – 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm
22 Business Plan 382 of 392
Zoning
Existing Zoning
AG-1, Agricultural/Rural
Low Density District
23
Surrounding Zoning
North – AG-1 and AR,
Agricultural/Residential
District
South – AG-1
East – AG-1 and AR
West – AG-1
383 of 392
Future Land Use24
Rural Village
•A future land use area where
limited development activity has
historically occurred and where
suburban or urban development
patterns are discouraged.
•These rural community and
farming areas are generally in
between the intense suburban
development patterns already
established in the County and the
designated Conservation and
Rural Preserve areas.
•The proposed Special Use Permit is
consistent with the Rural Village
Future Land Use Designation.
384 of 392
Planning Commission
Public Hearing – July 7, 2026
25
•Four (4) citizens spoke during the public hearing (3 opposed, 1 support).
•Concerns raised included:
•regulation changes and compatibility;
•application information inconsistencies;
•setback reduction from property lines;
•existing septic system to handle greywater from grooming services;
•vegetative buffers;
•use not compatible with the neighborhood;
•number of dogs on site;
•environmental issues; and
•noise.
385 of 392
Planning Commission26
•The Planning Commission discussed:
•differences between applications;
•notification process;
•animal code and the number of foster dogs allowed;
•previous zoning complaint;
•zoning ordinance amendment process;
•land use application requirements and process;
•no noise complaints received on this property;
•number of dogs that can be kept on the property;
•special use permit conditions;
•operations of the commercial kennel (waste management, cleaning
and maintenance, safety measures, fencing and screening; and use
of kennel silencer); and
•surrounding zoning and future land use designation.
386 of 392
Planning Commission27
The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the special use
permit in an AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, with the following
conditions:
1.The maximum number of dogs onsite shall be limited to twelve (12)
between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
2.The maximum number of dogs onsite overnight (after 6:00 p.m. and
before 7:30 a.m. the following day) shall be limited to two (2).
3.The setbacks of all outdoor runs, outdoor training areas and outdoor pens
associated with a commercial kennel shall be in substantial
conformance with the “Setback Map” submitted by the applicant.
387 of 392
Questions?
28
388 of 392
ROANOKE COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
TEL: (540) 772-2071
FAX: (540) 772-2089
Peter S. Lubeck
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Rachel W. Lower
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY
ATTORNEYSSAMPLE MOTIONS
The petition of Travis Bell to obtain a special use permit to operate a commercial kennel
on approximately 3.64 acres of land zoned AG-1 (Agricultural/Rural Low Density) District
at 6754 Grubb Road and 0 Grubb Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Roanoke
County Tax Parcel ID # 096.04-04-29.00-0000 and 096.04-04-28.00-0000)
MOTION TO APPROVE
I find that the proposed special use permit request:
1. Meets the requirements of Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that
the proposed special use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use
and design standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance;
2. Is in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and
3. Will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and
community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE APPROVE the petition for a special use permit with the
following conditions:
1. The maximum number of dogs onsite shall be limited to twelve (12) between the
hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
2. The maximum number of dogs onsite overnight (after 6:00 p.m. and before 7:30
a.m. the following day) shall be limited to two (2).
3. The setbacks of all outdoor runs, outdoor training areas, and outdoor pens
associated with a commercial kennel shall be in substantial conformance with the
“Setback Map” submitted by the applicant.
MOTION TO DENY
I find that the proposed special use permit request:
1. Is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the County’s adopted comprehensive
plan,
2. Is inconsistent with good zoning practice, and/or
3. Will result in substantial detriment to the community.
I therefore MOVE THAT WE DENY the request.389 of 392
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
MOTION TO DELAY ACTION
I find that the required information for the submitted proposal is incomplete. I therefore
MOVE TO DELAY action until additional necessary materials are submitted to the Board
of Supervisors.
390 of 392
Page 1 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL
KENNEL ON APPROXIMATELY 3.64 ACRES OF LAND ZONED AG-1
(AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6754 GRUBB
ROAD AND 0 GRUBB ROAD, IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
finds that the special use permit meets the requirements of
Section 30-19-1 of the Roanoke County Code and that the proposed special
use conforms with the standards set forth in article IV, use and design
standards of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance;
391 of 392
Page 2 of 2
2. The Board further finds that the special use permit is in conformance with
the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan;
3. The Board further finds that the special use permit will have a minimum
adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood and community;
4. The petition of Travis Bell to obtain a special use permit to operate a
commercial kennel on approximately 3.64 acres of land zoned AG-1
(Agricultural/Rural Low Density) District, located at 6754 Grubb Road and 0
Grubb Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Roanoke County Tax Parcel
#096.04-04-29.00-0000 and 096.04-04-28.00-0000) is approved with the
following three (3) conditions:
1) The maximum number of dogs onsite shall be limited to twelve (12)
between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
2) The maximum number of dogs onsite overnight (after 6:00 p.m. and
before 7:30 a.m. the following day) shall be limited to two (2).
3) The setbacks of all outdoor runs, outdoor training areas, and outdoor
pens associated with a commercial kennel shall be in substantial
conformance with the “Setback Map” submitted by the applicant.
5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final
passage. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district
map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this
ordinance.
392 of 392