The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8/23/2005 - Regular Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda August 23, 2005 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for August 23, 2005. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. The meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Reverend Barbara Gill St. John's AME Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring Friday, August 26, 2005, as the sixth annual Hokie Pride Day in Roanoke County D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to appropriate $156,000 to add two (2) additional Animal Control Officers with vehicles and equipment. (Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police) 2. Request to approve change order for sewer line replacement for Public Safety Building. (Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator) 1 F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 375.±. acres from ARCS, Agricultural Residential with conditions and a special use permit, and ARS, Agricultural Residential with a special use permit, to Planned Residential District, for the purpose of developing a golf course resort and residential community with other uses per Section 30-47-2 B such as a clubhouse, restaurant, and overnight cottage accommodations, and to develop a maximum of 89 single family residences on 375.±. acres for a density of .24 residential units per acre, on property located at 3687 Pitzer Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Lester George. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance to approve the second amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Joint Public Safety Radio System to provide authority to hire a consultant for lire-banding" of the 800 MHz system. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. First reading of an ordinance amending a lease with Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. for a communications antenna tower at Catawba Fire Station, Catawba Magisterial District. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes - August 9, 2005 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee 2 3. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $75,000 from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation 4. Request from the schools to appropriate dual enrollment revenues in the amount of $1,847.88 5. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $43,698.44 from the Universal Services (E-Rate) Program 6. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $885 from Moss in the Valley for the P. Buckley Moss Conference 7. Request from the schools to appropriate fees in the amount of $800 collected from the Dance and Theatre Techniques Summer Camp 8. Request to contribute donated funds in the amount of $17,000 to the Knights Booster Foundation 9. Request from the Police Department to accept and appropriate a Division of Motor Vehicle mini-grant in the amount of $2,000 to conduct DUI check points K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Future Capital Projects 5. Accounts Paid - July 2005 6. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month ended July 31,2005 7. Public Safety Center Building Project Budget Report 8. Public Safety Center Building Project Change Order Report 3 9. Jail Study Costs Report 10. Preliminary unaudited results of operations for the year ended June 30, 2005 O. CLOSED MEETING P. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room - 4th floor) 1. Joint work session with the Planning Commission to provide an update on development of the master plan for public facilities. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator; Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development; and Joel Shelton, Administration Intern) 2. Work session to discuss proposed new County vehicle maintenance facility. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator, and Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of Roanoke County preschool programs for earning accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young Children S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Continued until November 15 at the reauest of the petitioner. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone .98 acres from C1, Office District, to C2, General Commercial District, and to obtain a special use permit on 2.22 acres for the operation of a fast food restaurant and drive-thru located at the intersections of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue, and Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Seaside Heights, LLC (Bojangles). (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 2. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone .156 acres from R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to C-1, Office District, for the construction of a parking area in conjunction with an office located at 5604 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Caveness Properties, LLC. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 4 3. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a convenience store on approximately 1.9 acres located at 6044 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vision Builders, LLC. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 4. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 9.95 acres from R- 1, Single Family Residential District, to PRD, Planned Residential District with conditions, to construct 60 townhomes at a density not to exceed 6.1 units per acre located at the corner of Newland Road and Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of R. Fralin Development Corporation. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Richard C. Flora 2. Joseph P. McNamara 3. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 4. Michael A. Wray 5. Michael W. Altizer V. ADJOURNMENT 5 ..¡. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C·· t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation declaring August 26, 2005 as the sixth annual Hokie Pride Day in Roanoke County Elmer C. Hodge /'11 County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Hokie Club and the Roanoke Valley Virginia Tech Alumni Association have requested that the County issue a proclamation declaring Friday, August 26,2005, as the sixth annual Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day. Pat Green and Brian Wilson, Board members of the Roanoke Valley Hokie Club, will be present to accept the proclamation. .. -~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 PROCLAMATION DECLARING AUGUST 26, 2005 AS THE SIXTH ANNUAL HOKIE PRIDE DAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley has had a long and mutually beneficial relationship with Virginia Tech, its alumni, and supporters, and is home to many thousands of Virginia Tech alumni and friends of the University; and WHEREAS, Virginia Tech has brought great positive attention to Southwest Virginia in academics, research and athletics; and the supporters of Virginia Tech feel great pride in the accomplishments of the University; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Tech Hokie Club and the Virginia Tech Alumni Association, which extends membership to any and all supporters of Virginia Tech, are promoting Friday, August 26,2005, as the sixth annual Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke wishes to recognize the positive impact of Virginia Tech on its community and to encourage all supporters of Virginia Tech, both individuals and businesses, to demonstrate their Hokie pride. NOW THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim Friday, August 26, 2005, as the sixth annual HOKIE PRIDE DAY in the County of Roanoke, and call its significance to the attention of all of our citizens; and FURTHER, we extend our best wishes to Virginia Tech, its alumni, friends and supporters for continued success in future endeavors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. l::. - \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 Request to appropriate $156,000 to add two (2) additional Animal Control Officers with vehicles and equipment AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Ray Lavinder Chief of Police Elmer C. Hodge ø..- ~ County Administrator (" ) APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The animal control function was established and operated out of the County Administrator's Office until it was transferred to the Police Department in 1994. For more than 25 years the County has functioned with three animal control officers. During this time period, the number of calls for service and the population has increased substantially. In the five year period from 1999 to 2004, animal control calls increased from 2,009 to 3,071, an increase of over 34%. The three officers are scheduled so that there is available coverage from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, and one officer is scheduled each weekend from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. For the times that there is not an officer on duty, there is always one officer available on call. The average response time for animal control officers who are on duty is forty three (43) minutes. Currently, there are approximately 3,000 animal control-related calls per year. Because of the shortage in staffing, about 35% of animal control calls are being handled by uniform patrol officers, who do not have the equipment and are not trained in humane and safe capture techniques. Without the equipment and the training to handle these calls, most cases require a follow-up call by an animal control officer at a later time. These follow-up calls are not counted in the statistical data. ¿-I Wild animals are the responsibility of the Virginia Game Commission; however, the Police Department has a practice of responding to calls from citizens dealing with wild animals, in addition to handling domestic animals. This is done to ensure the safety of citizens who cannot receive a timely response from the Virginia Game Commission. The City of Salem has four personnel assigned to the animal control function and the City of Roanoke has eight persons assigned. Travel time with a captured animal is insignificant with both of these cities, while it consumes a significant portion of the Roanoke County Animal Control Officer's work day. Vinton has one animal control officer. As evidenced by the statistics outlined above, it is essential that Roanoke County increase the number of Animal Control Officers by two to a total of five positions. We will also need to increase the Department's vehicle count by two and include funds to purchase the necessary vehicles and equipment. The additional two positions will allow for scheduling full coverage from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, and to have two officers working on the weekends. It is important to hire these officers immediately because the next Police Academy starts October 3, 2005. These officers will spend 27 weeks in the Academy, and graduate in early April 2006. They will then have 12-16 weeks of field training before their training is complete. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of increasing staffing by two positions is approximately $156,000. This will include the salary, benefits and equipment for both positions. Of this amount, $70,460 is a recurring cost related to salaries and benefits. The remaining $85,540 is a one-time cost for vehicles, training, uniforms, and equipment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: According to the Budget Department, based upon preliminary year end projections, real estate taxes will exceed the budgeted amount for 2005-06 by this amount. Staff recommends increasing the real estate revenue budget by $156,000 and appropriating these funds to the two new animal control officers, their vehicles and equipment. 2 , ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E-8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve change order for sewer line replacement for the Public Safety Building SUBMITTED BY: Dan O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge ~ fl4 County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~crf~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As previously discussed with the Board at the June 24, 2005, Board of Supervisor's meeting, analysis of the existing sewer line which serves the school administration building and served the old school warehouses shows that it is in very poor condition and does not meet Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) standards. Therefore it must be replaced. The old line is a 6" terra cotta line and has many cracks and leaks. The replacement line will be 8" PVC and will be constructed in accordance with WVWA standards. Upon completion of the project, it will be turned over to the WVWA and will become a public sewer line. This line will serve the existing school administration building as well as the new public safety building. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for the change order is $124,519. The original change order proposal from Northrop-Grumman was $146,000. However, Construction Dynamics Group, the County's construction management firm, was successful in working to improve the alignment in order to shorten the length of the line. This resulted in a savings of $21 ,481. 4 \C- (~) Funds for the sewer line will come from the contingency account. The current balance of the contingency account is $492,211. Upon execution of this change order, the balance of the contingency will be $367,692. ALTERNATIVES: Staff worked with the WVWA to investigate the possibility of running the line behind the school administration building through two private properties to connect with the public line along Green Ridge Road. This alternative would have provided a better route for private property owners along Ponderosa Drive to connect to public sewer. However, the largest property owner does not plan to develop her property in the future and does not want the line to pass through her property. Therefore this alternative was dropped from consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the change order to provide for approximately 1,605 linear feet of 8" sewer line and five manholes at the cost of $124,519 to be paid from the contingency account. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. \= - \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances - consent agenda SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner Elmer C. Hodge e /1 County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for September 27, 2005. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. The petition of Lester George to rezone 375.±. acres from ARCS, Agricultural Residential with conditions and a special use permit and ARS, Agricultural Residential with special use permit to Planned Residential District. The property is located at 3687 Pitzer Road, Vinton Magisterial District. The purpose of the Planned Residential District petition is to develop a golf course resort and residential community with other uses per Section 30-47-2 B such as a clubhouse, restaurant and overnight cottage accommodations, and to develop a maximum of 89 single family residences on 375.±. acres for a density of .24 residential units per acre. Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. 1 '\.. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for September 27. 2005. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 2 ,- County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl Date received: Received by: 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX 776-7155 Application fee: PC/BZA dale: Placards issued: BOS date: Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance o Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Phone: (804) 272-4700 Work: Cell #: Fax No.: Applicants name/address w/zip Lester George 609 Twin Ridge Lane Owner's name/address w/zip NBO Associates 4616 Phyllis Road Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Property Location Property located on both sides of Pitzer Road. T!x Map No.: 7-. .. oL/-- ~D - iQ 100). 0/ ).. 0 J f ... D - - D ¡ . Db . Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 1 ri 1 -:2 + / -~,.. Magisterial District: Vinton Community Planning area: Mt. pleasant Existing Zoning: AR Proposed Zoning: PRD-Planned Residential Development Proposed Land Use: Golf Course/Residential Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes OC No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST I f rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? No 0 VarianceIWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY 0 F THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W V/AA R/S/W V/AA R/S/W V/AA rn Consultation Eii 8 1/2" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner' agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. 4~,~~-f ~ ~ k I4-C-r ¡Cvr., c.. f.h4COV<- Owner's Signature 2 Applicant Lester George The Plamúng Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to detennine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 1. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning ofthe applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. This project furthers the PRD Section of the Zoning Ordinance by providing a planned residential golf course community. The site incorporates commercial uses including a golf course & associated restaurant within the property, along with a variety of housing options including lodging & single family residences. These varied uses of the land create an opportunity for ingenuity & quality design to promote a superior living environment to the residents of this planned community. The overall community plan including the golf course promotes preservation of the area by providing approximately 50% open space in the total development. 2. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The property currently possesses a special use permit for the golf course. All on site housing will be per AR regulations, which in general complies with the rural preservation designation in the community plan. 3. Please describe the impact(s) ofthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. This project will have no impact on public utilities because all water and sewer services will be provided by well3and septic. The parcels located within the development will mostly remain open space except for the housing along the golf course. The adjoining properties will see limited impact from the development since the site'stopography works well with the proposed concept plan. 3 · . I A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use pennit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exemot some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the followin!! are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS l a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces X e. X f. X g. X h. X I. - X J. Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS X k. - X 1. - X m. --1L n. X o. X p. X q. Existing utilities (water, sewer, stonn drains) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all 'tems required in the checklist above are complete_ Si e·/7·ó( Date 6 Planning Commission Application Acceptance Procedure The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if the new or additional infonnation is presented at the public hearing. Ifit is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional infonnation prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional infonnation and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to detennine if a continuance may be warranted. Name of Petition: 1iJw.hA/~ ~ 10 ~ 6c/f ;2S~T ¡ilk-,. ,J ~ Petitioner's Signature: Date: ¿>·)ì. ÞS-- 8 '- ì ¡-- .... Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICA TION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. ~~ f'¡u¡J µ ~If ts¡.,¿ / Name of Petition ~ Á/i,J ~f - ~. /7. P5 Date ï--- y- - Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reselVe the right to request a traffic study at any time~ as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: · Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units · Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) · Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash · Retail shop/Shopping center · Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) · Regional public facilities · Educational/Recreational facilities · Religious assemblies · Hotel/Motel · Golf course · Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic · Industrial site/Factory · Day care center · Ba n k · Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: · Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) · For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly · When required to evaluate access issues · Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) · Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem · Development would potentially negatively impact eXisting/planned traffic signal(s) · Substantial departure from the Community Plan · Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Zoning .AG3 .EP .AGI AIi .AV CI .C2 . C2CVOD I~ ~ 12 . ¡>CD PR[) .PTD R1 R2 Ii;) R4 Slfeel Cenlarllne. I 1 - Applicants Name: N B 0 Associates Existing Zoning: AR Proposed Zoning: PRO Tax Map Number: 79.00-1-1,79.04-2-10,10.1,10.2,11,12 Magisterial District: Vinton Area: 364.32 Acres August 18, 2005 1 inch equals 1,000 feet Roanoke County Department of Community Development ACTION NO. " ITEM NO. .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 First reading of ordinance approving the second amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement for Joint Public Safety Radio System to authorize hiring a consultant for "re- banding" of the 800 MHz system AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Rebanding or migration of frequencies for the County and City's 800 MHz public safety radio system has been mandated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on a nationwide basis due to frequent problems with interference from commercial wireless communications providers. Starting in April 2005, Virginia localities including Roanoke County and Roanoke City are in the first wave of a four-tiered rebanding process. The FCC has required Nextel to set aside $2 billion to pay for this 800 MHz re-banding process nationwide and has established an independent agency, the Transition Administrator (T A), to oversee this massive undertaking. Proceeding jointly, the County and City are moving forward with the procurement process to hire a consultant to advise our localities on the many technical and legal issues involved in negotiations with Nextel to cover the costs of reprogramming the frequencies on all the public safety radios. In order to avoid any cost to our localities from this federally mandated process, Roanoke County and Roanoke City, acting jointly, must enter into an agreement with Nextel for the reimbursement of all expenses related to the rebanding process before incurring any expenses. The proposed second amendment to the existing Intergovernmental Agreement for Public Safety Radio System, originally entered into in 1997, provides legal authority for the County and City to act jointly through the Roanoke County Purchasing Department to obtain a qualified consultant in compliance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. A joint committee of County and City employees has been working to keep this major undertaking on schedule. Consistent with current established practice, any costs to the localities would be shared on an equal 50/50 percentage basis. Roanoke City Council will act upon this measure at its meeting on September 6, 2005. The first reading of this ordinance is scheduled for August 23, 2005. The second reading is scheduled for September 13, 2005. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance approving the second amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement to provide legal authority for joint action for hiring a consultant to assist Roanoke County and Roanoke City in the 800 MHz rebanding process. The amendment also reflects the ongoing joint nature of our combined public safety radio systems and provides authorization for further cooperative actions to implement the 800 MHz reconfiguration. 2 /r j '-,::::> '- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 ORDINANCE APPROVING AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AJOINT PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM WHEREAS, §15.2-1300, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes agreements for the joint exercise of powers by political subdivisions of the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, by Agreement dated December 17,1997, amended October 1,2001, the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement for the establishment of a joint Public Safety Radio System; and, WHEREAS, from that date forward, the City and County have effectively operated their E-911 public safety radio systems as a joint, unified system for the protection and benefit of the citizens of both localities on an equal cost-sharing basis; and WHEREAS, as a result of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to address nation-wide problems of interference from wireless communications systems with public safety radio frequencies in the 800 MHz band, the City and County's joint radio system will be required to carry out a reconfiguration or "rebanding" of its 800 MHz radio which will require substantial technical assistance, time and potential cost; and WHEREAS, the FCC has required Nextel corporation to pay for all costs, direct and indirect, associated with this "rebanding" process on a nation-wide basis, but with the further condition that localities enter into contracts with Nextel defining the scope of their responsibilities prior to incurring these costs in order to legally obligate Nextel to pay for or reimburse localities for their "rebanding" expenses; and, r::"_ _ \.:1 -~ 'I WHEREAS, because of the complex technical and potential legal issues which our two localities will face during the "rebanding" process, requires that the City and County hire a consultant to negotiate with Nextel for a contract and to assist with supervision of this "rebanding" process; and WHEREAS, an amendment to our localities existing Intergovernmental Agreement is needed to clarify the authority of the City and County to act jointly and cooperatively in procurement of appropriate technical assistance in this legally mandated process and confirm the currently existing practice of equal cost-sharing of expenses related to our joint public safety radio system; and WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, will be requested to approve this Amendment Number Two to the existing Intergovernmental Agreement and the appropriate administrative departments of Roanoke County have requested approval of this Agreement by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 23,2005, and the second reading was held on September 13, 2005. BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That the Amendment Number Two to the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Establishment of a Joint Public Safety Radio System, originally dated the 1 yth day of December, 1997, between Roanoke County and the City of Roanoke, for the joint procurement of technical services for the "rebanding" of the 800 MHz public safety radio system and the equal cost sharing of expenses and equipment related to this "rebanding" 2 " process and future operations of this system is approved and ratified on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized and directed to execute this Amendment Number Two to the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Establishment of a Joint Public Safety Radio System, on behalf of Roanoke County, upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. 3 · -"' AMENDMENT TWO TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA This Amendment Number Two to the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Establishment of a Joint Public Safety Radio System ("Agreement") is dated this day of , 2005, by and between the CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "City") a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, by action of their respective governing bodies, the City and County entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement dated December 17, 1997, for the purpose of expanding the County's existing 800 MHz trunked radio communications system ("System") to be expanded and upgraded in order to serve the present and future needs of both the City and the County's for fire, police, emergency and other radio communications, pursuant to Section 15.2- 1300, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended; and WHEREAS, this Intergovernmental Agreement has been amended by subsequent agreement dated October 1, 2001, for the purpose of providing further details governing the operation of this joint System and the relationship among the City and County; and WHEREAS, interference to 800 MHz public safety communications systems around the country has resulted from the increasing number of commercial wireless systems that also operate in the 800 MHZ frequency band, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has imposed a nationwide requirement that all public safety communications systems and private commercial wireless systems be reconfigured or "rebanded" so that both public and private systems be separated at different parts of the 800 MHZ spectrum; and WHEREAS, the FCC has imposed upon Nextel ("Nextel") the financial obligation to pay for all direct and indirect costs associated with this "rebanding" frequency reconfiguration and, further, has established an independent agency, the Transition Administrator ("TA"), to supervise this process nationwide; and WHEREAS, each locality which holds 800 MHz frequency licenses from the FCC must negotiate a contract with Nextel in order to obtain comparable facilities in the new frequency of the 800 MHz spectrum for its public safety system and to be reimbursed for the cost of implementing such reconfiguration; and " " .....- '-~ WHEREAS, the City and County desire to further amend their Intergovernmental Agreement for the purpose of providing details related to the operation and implementation of the required reconfiguration of the 800 MHz band and to authorize the issuance of a joint RFP between the City and the County for the purpose of hiring a consultant and/or legal counsel to assist with contract negotiations with Nextel in connection with such reconfiguration. THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-1300 of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, do covenant and agree to the following: 1. The Agreement is hereby amended to authorize the County to issue a Request for Proposals (URFP") and for the County and the City to jointly utilize the Request for Proposals (URFP") for the purpose of hiring a consultant and/or legal counsel to negotiate a contract with Nextel in connection with the 800 MHz band reconfiguration, such reconfiguration being more fully described in the materials attached hereto as Exhibit A, which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 2. The City and the County hereby agree to cooperate fully in all necessary actions required to implement the aforementioned 800 MHz reconfiguration. Notwithstanding the provisions in the Agreement that provide for the sharing of the System's cost between the parties, all costs incurred by the City and the County to implement the required reconfiguration shall be shared equally. 3. Except as changed or modified herein, the conditions, terms and obligations of the Agreement, and any amendments thereto, except to the extent as changed or modified by this Amendment No. Two, shall remain in full force and effect as if fully stated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, each duly authorized, have hereunto affixed their signatures and seals to this Amendment No. Two. CITY OF ROANOKE ATTEST: By: By: Title: Title: 2 .' Date: ATTEST: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: City Attorney Approved as to form: Cou nty Attorney Date: COUNTY OF ROANOKE By: Title: Date: Approved as to execution: City Attorney Approved as to execution: County Attorney 3 --i --I ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -'\ '" ~-;z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance amending a lease with Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. for a communications antenna tower at Catawba Fire Station SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services Elmer C. Hodge ¿ fd County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~-1Ý--4 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1997, the Board of Supervisors approved a lease allowing Ohio State Cellular, d/b/a/ United States Cellular, to locate a tower at the Catawba Fire Station. Ohio State Cellular agreed to pay rent in the amount of $500/month, with annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index. The lease expires on March 31, 2013, and the current rent is $573.98. The County has requested space on that tower for an antenna for the new fire and rescue paging system, along with space for the associated equipment on the ground. Ohio State Cellular has agreed to this request, in return for a reduction of rent in the amount of $100/month. Calculation of the rent increases based on the Consumer Price Index will also change from March, 25, 1998 to March 25, 2005. There are no other towers available in that area which are suitable for providing the necessary coverage for the paging system. '---- -) FISCAL IMPACT: Rent received from Ohio State Cellular will be reduced by $1 ,200/year for the first year, and a new base rent of $473.98 will be used for future adjustments calculated using the Consumer Price Index. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the first reading of this ordinance and place it on the agenda for a second reading at the next meeting of the Board of Supervisors. 2. Direct staff to find other alternatives for an antenna site for the fire and rescue paging system. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative One. Since there are no other towers in the vicinity to provide comparable coverage, and based on the cost to the County of erecting a tower and cabinet sufficient for this purpose, it is more economical and efficient to amend the lease with Ohio State Cellular in order to improve the public safety response system. 2 '\ J (.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIN CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 ORDINANCE AMENDING A LEASE WITH OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE COMPANY, INC. FOR A COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA TOWER AT CATAWBA FIRE STATION, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ordinance 102897-6 approved and authorized the execution of a lease with Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. for a communications antenna tower at Catawba Fire Station, Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Ohio State Cellular executed a Ground Lease in March of 1998 providing for a fifteen year term expiring on March 31, 2013 and base rent of $500 per month with annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index; the base rent as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index is currently $573.98; and WHERAS, Roanoke County has requested space on the tower for an antenna for the new fire and rescue paging system, along with space for the associated equipment on the ground; Ohio State Cellular has agreed to this request in return for a reduction of the base rent payment of $100 per month; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 23, 2005, and the second reading was held on September 13, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Amendment Number One to Ground Lease dated March 24, 1998, (1) allowing Roanoke County to locate an antenna for the new fire and rescue paging system, along with space for the associated equipment on the ground; (2) providing for a new base rent effective July 1, 2005 of $473.98 per month; and (3) changing the /' / ('C- .¿' .1 I j adjustment date for the Consumer Price Index calculations to March 25, 2005 be, and hereby is, approved; and 2. That the County Administrator, or assistant county administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this action, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2 ~.; .-:-' Catawba 764307 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE to GROUND LEASE dated March 24, 1998 THIS AMENDMENT, made the _ day of , 2005 modifies that certain GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT (the "LEASE") dated March 24, 1998 by and between County of Roanoke Virginia, 5204 Bernard Drive, P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798, ("Lessor") and Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. a Florida corporation, d/bla United States Cellular Wireless Communications ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, Virginia RSA #4, Inc., a Virginia corporation, (U. S. Cellular) is successor in interest to Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. a Florida corporation: WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to modify certain portions of provisions of said LEASE AGREEMENT (the "LEASE"); NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree that the LEASE is now modified as follows: 1. Under Provision 5 captioned Use of the Premises subparagraph (a) is added as follows: Lessee does hereby grant Lessor the right to attach to said communications antenna tower one (1) Decibel DB 222 antenna at the 150' center of said tower and to attach one (1) line of 7/8" coax to the tower to service said antenna as specified on attached Exhibit B. In addition, Lessee does hereby grant to Lessor the right to place an equipment cabinet/or shelter within said Leasehold Parcel as more particularly depicted and/or described on attached Exhibit C. No other modification, replacement, substitution or addition of antennas and/or equipment cabinet or shelter shall be allowed without Lessee's express written approval and in Lessee's sole and absolute discretion. 2. Effective July 1, 2005 and Lessee's Base Rent payment amount shall decrease to four hundred seventy three dollars and ninety eight cents ($473.98) per month. Thereafter rent in the amount of four hundred seventy three dollars and ninety eight cents ($473.98) shall be due as of the first day of each month. 3. The historical month used as a basis for Consumer Price Index calculations as stated in Article 10 of the Lease is hereby changed from March 25, 1998 to March 25, 2005. 4. In the event of any inconsistencies between the LEASE and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control. 5. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the LEASE otherwise is unmodified, remains in full force and effect and is incorporated and restated herein as if fully set forth at length. Each reference in the LEASE to itself shall be deemed also to refer to this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be duly subscribed and are bound as of the day and year first above written. [END OF AMENDMENT] [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] :~)- Signature Page LESSOR: County of Roanoke Virginia, By: Printed: Title: Date: LESSEE: Virginia RSA #4, Inc. By: Printed: Title: Date: STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) ) I, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that , known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO GROUND LEASE, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he/she signed the said Amendment as hislher free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and seal this _ day of ,2005. Notary Public My commission expires STATE OF ) ) ) COUNTY OF I, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that , known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO GROUND LEASE, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that, pursuant to his authority, he signed the said Amendment as his free and voluntary act on behalf of the named Lessee corporation, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and seal this _ day of ,2005. Notary Public My commission expires ......, \ '~'T",*,:_~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. S- \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge [fJ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee The following one-year terms will expire on August 31, 2005: Barbara Bushnell, Windsor Hills District; Jason B. Perdue, Hollins District; and Mike Roop, Vinton District. There is also a vacancy in the Catawba District for a one-year term that will expire on August 31,2005. I\ - (r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,2005 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 23, 2005, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes - August 9, 2005 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee 3. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $75,000 from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation 4. Request from the schools to appropriate dual enrollment revenues in the amount of $1,847.88 5. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $43,698.44 from the Universal Services (E-Rate) Program 6. Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $885 from Moss in the Valley for the P. Buckley Moss Conference 7. Request from the schools to appropriate fees in the amount of $800 collected from the Dance and Theatre Techniques Summer Camp 8. Request to contribute donated funds in the amount of $17,000 to the Knights Booster Foundation 9. Request from the Police Department to accept and appropriate a Division of Motor Vehicle mini-grant in the amount of $2,000 to conduct DUI check points 1 ,; \. ...~1' ~ \ 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,.J, J, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 2005 Confirmation of appointment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge ê(J County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee At the August 9, 2005, meeting, Supervisor Wray nominated Pam Berberich, Cave Spring District, to serve an additional one-year term that will expire on August 31,2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Advisory Committee be confirmed. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -J-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 2005 Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $75,000 from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange Deputy Superintendent Elmer C. Hodge f If County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~---c SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools has received a grant from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation in the amount of $75,000. The grant will fund 50 percent of the salaries for three full-time elementary student assistance program coordinator positions. The positions instruct the Life Skills Prevention Curriculum which includes alcohol and other drugs and non-violence resolution methods as well as other support services. FISCAL IMPACT: The elementary student assistance program budget will be increased by $75,000. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the $75,000 grant from the Virginia Tobacco Settlement Foundation be appropriated as requested. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 3-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 Request from schools to appropriate dual enrollment revenues in the amount of $1,847.88 AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange Deputy Superintendent APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge C/1 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools and Virginia Western Community College have an agreement whereby the college provides college level courses in English, US History, and certain vocational subjects. The courses are taught by Roanoke County teachers who meet the college's criteria for adjunct professors. Monies that have been collected exceed the expenses. Roanoke County Schools added students to the Dual Enrollment count for second semester. VWCC reimbursed the school system $1,847.88 for services rendered. FISCAL IMPACT: The instructional budget will be increased by $1,847.88. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended that the reimbursement of $1,847.88 by VWCC be appropriated to the instructional program. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. .J-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $43,698.44 from the Universal Services (E-Rate) Program SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Jane James Director of Technology Elmer C. Hodge ¿, H County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Since the inception of the E-Rate Program for Schools, the reimbursements received have been used for instructional equipment. Roanoke County Schools has been approved to receive a reimbursement from the Universal Services Corporation (E-Rate Program) in the amount of $43,698.44. The school division requests appropriation of the funding for the purchase of instructional equipment (laptop computers for middle school teachers and desktop computers for technology education). FISCAL IMPACT: The technology budget will be increased by $43,698.44 for the purchase of middle school laptop and desktop computers. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended that the $43,698.44 in reimbursements from the E-Rate Program be appropriated to the technology budget to be used as stated. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -..-' .., AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $885 from Moss in the Valley for the P. Buckley Moss Conference SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange Deputy Superintendent Elmer C. Hodge ,¿¡;J' County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools has received scholarship funds in the amount of $885 from Moss in the Valley. The funds will be used to send teachers to the P. Buckley Moss Annual Conference. FISCAL IMPACT: The instruction budget will be increased by $885. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended that the $885 in scholarship funds be appropriated to the instruction budget. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the schools to appropriate fees in the amount of $800 collected from the Dance and Theatre Techniques Summer Camp SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange Deputy Superintendent Elmer C. Hodge t:E f5 County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A summer camp for dance and theatre techniques was offered to Roanoke County Students. The tuition per student was $50. A total of sixteen students attended and a total of $800 was collected to be used for teacher salaries and instructional materials. FISCAL IMPACT: The instruction budget will be increased by $800. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended that the $800 in tuition fees be appropriated to the instruction budget. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,J:.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request to contribute donated funds to the Knights Booster Foundation SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Elmer C. Hodge ~ If County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Knights Booster Club at Cave Spring High School recently went through a reorganization. As part of this reorganization, they gave the County $17,000 to hold while the necessary forms were filed and approved. The Knights Booster Club has now received its Section 501 (c)(3) designation as a charity organization under the Internal Revenue Code. At this time, the club has requested that the County return to it the $17,000. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact to the County. The funds have been held temporarily with the understanding that they would be returned to the club once it completed its application for tax exempt status. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends returning the $17,000 to the Knights Booster Club from funds that had previously been given to the County from the club. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. :,- ·1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Police Department to accept and appropriate a Division of Motor Vehicle Mini-Grant in the amount of $2,000 to conduct DUI check points SUBMITTED BY: James R. Lavinder Chief of Police APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge f /1 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The funds will be used to support the Roanoke County Police Department's efforts in reducing drivers operating motor vehicle's while under the influence of alcohol. These funds will pay officers overtime to conduct DUI check points in Roanoke County. FISCAL IMPACT: No matching funds are required. ALTERNATIVES: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this Division of Motor Vehicle grant in the amount of $2,000.00 GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2005 Amount $11,808,285 Unallocated revenue 2005-2006 350,000 Balance at August 23,2005 12,158,285 N -\ % of General Fund Revenues 7.57% 7.79% Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for 2005-06 at a range of 7.5%-8.5% of General Fund Revenues 2005 - 2006 General Fund Revenues $156,020,489 7.5% of General Fund Revenues $11,701,537 8.5% of General Fund Revenues $13,261,742 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator N-º COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Amount Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2005 $5,268,848.06 7/26/2005 Appropriation for construction of new school warehouse (117,000.00) Balance at August 23, 2005 $5,151,848.06 $5,000,000 of this balance will be reserved for radio purchases in the planned CIP funding Major County Capital Reserve (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2005 $1,416,838.00 7/1/2005 Capital Improvement Program funding for 2005-06 (Library) (1,416,838.00) Balance at August 23, 2005 $0.00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator N-3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2005-2006 Original Budget $100,000.00 August9,2005 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison ($15,000.00) Balance at August 23,2005 $85,000.00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator N-Y FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2005 FY 2005-2006 Original budget appropriation Less increase in debt service Add Economic Development Dropoff FY 2005-2006 Annual Capital Contribution County Schools Balance at August 23, 2005 2,000,000 (3,424,615) 524,000 300,000 300,000 $ 6,242,387 (900,615) 600,000 $ 5,941,772 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1/- ., ¡ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid-July 2005 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors $ $ $ 5,528,284.84 Payroll 7/1/2005 859,118.70 165,287.12 1,024,405.82 Payroll 7/15/2005 857,123.53 145,157.16 1,002,280.69 Payroll 7/29/2005 824,265.88 148,073.81 972,339.69 Manual Checks 2,376.16 2,376.16 Voids 721.92 721.92 Grand Total $ 8,530,409.12 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ,'-y '~ ~ ~ ,.Q V) \C N I/') '" '" .... M 0 M 00 ~ \C 0 N '<t 00 0 ~ 0 0 '" I'- 0 ° a-. ... .. ~ S c .... \C '" 0 = '" I'- I'- N V) \C CO .... '" '" I'- I'- I'- V) '<t CO CO M \C CO CO N v; Q c = ~ .. M r-: -.i oci >D 00 r-: 0 0\ >D 00 ~ >D >D >D '<t r-: >D ~ r-: M or) S '" ... . ~ 0 Q, C 0 ... ... ¡.¡ .. = !:' ¡.¡ ., == 0 ¡:¡ o!J .. 00 ;.. ~ . '" I'- 00 IX> 00 IX> I'- I'- 00 ,.., 0 \C N \C '" a-. 0 '<t V) 0 0 I/') " " ... M 0 \C V) g> '" 0 CO 0 .... I'- "'1 = \C 0 \C or. ~ ~ I'- I'- \C M = M 0 ~ V) 0 CO a-. 8 ,.Q >D v1 ..¡ oó N 0 -.i oó -.i r-: N N r-: 0 ,..¡ oó oó >D 0 oci 0- S 1:1 M M M V) N V) V) = c '" '<t \C = '" '<t '<t 00 N V) I'- N 00 \C '" I'- V) a-. '" \C 00 N N 0 00 IX> ... .. 0, 00 .... '<t I'- "i- N. c: M V) .... '" V) 00 '" '<to \C '<t \C N \C "'!. V) ,.., c -; Ó N' v:) Ñ oci N Ó r-: oó Ñ 0\ 1'-' 0\ = 0\ '<to -D .,.¡ M oó = '" M .... M C == 0 \C \C N I'- 0 IX> 00 V) '<t IX> \C '" '<t V) I'- N I'- '" I'- \C \C M \C a-. ;;;. M I'- N ,.., c: I'- I'-~ M I'- \C M = M N N. '<t 00 M or~ '<t "', '<t N ,.., oó a\ .... Ó oci .,.¡ or. .,¡: M Ñ .... M .,.¡ Ñ Ñ N .... .... '" ... I'- N N 0 N N '" N I'- 0 '<t '<t 00 '<t .... V) 0 '" \C V) 0 0 I/') C M M M ., .. .. ~ '" ~ IX> M \C a-. M 00 '" M '<t '<t CO N N M \C C') M 0 ex: "'1 '<t 0 0 = '" ... ... N r-: -.i oci N r-: >D oó ~ N 0 >D r-: .... oci 0 -.i 0 0 oci ... ,.Q N M M N M .: s Q ° N 00 = I'- 00 ~ V) M N ,.., I- M M 0 I'- '" '<t 00 I'- a-. :; = S '" '" '" IX> V) N IX> V) 00 I'- '" ~ \C N N M ~ '" IX> I'- V) ~ C ... r-"' r-:. Ó v:) Ó OÓ aó M OÓ oci 0\ .... r-: OÓ .,¡: N' M Ñ aó 0\ M Ó 00' .... C ... .... '<t ,.., a-. a-. '" ¡.¡ '<t V) 00 \C 00 '" N N M N I'- N V) Q, .. IX> .... or. I'- ~ ... o!J .. I'- -, '" M Ñ M N M M ¡.¡ ;.. '" = .S! .. 0 0 0 0 = 00 0 0 0 N a-. ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 = - ... N N 0 V) ,.., 00 '<t V) c 0 \C 0 ~ 0 0 = N 00 ~ ° I'- 0 V) 00 0 00 ,.., 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 = '" .. .. ï: c ... 0 >D 0 ~ 0 0 é -.i -.i 0 é 0 V) >D OÓ 0 -.i or) 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N Q, :; ,.Q N N I'- I'- N V) 0 IX> '" '<t V) 0 = V) I/') C S - '" a-. I'- 00 '" '<t 00 M, 00 0, .... '" a-. 0 ~ C .,.¡ or; .,.¡ or. -D Ñ >D v:) .,.¡ .,¡: ,..¡ V)' or. 100 I/') ... Q, ~ C 00 IX> \C IX> I'- M N :; ¡.¡ M N or. N Q, .... 0 < ~ '" "0 I'- = ï: = '6iI '" '" 100 ~ ;; '"' = .¡ '" "0 ., 100 .. '" ..:.:: "0 ... I'- N = 0 N N M 00 N '<t 0 \C 0 M '<t '" N V) 0 '" \C V) 0 0 I/') 0 .c c » ~ ~ M ~ ~ M \C a-. ~ "'1 M I'- ~ '<t ~ M I'- or. "'1 ° 00 M '<t 0 0 = = e ¡.;¡ :c :; N >D .... -.i oci N ,..¡ 00 V) OÓ or) M >D >D >D N ~ 00 0 0\ M -.i 0 0 ~ '" ::I "0 :; c 0 '" 00 IX> I'- a-. M I'- N I/') I'- 00 I'- 0 ~ '" 00 00 I'- '<t " '" '" I'- '" ~ V) M IX> 00 '" oc: '" or. \C M 00 '<t V) "', I'- I'- V) I'- 0 '"' ï: c Q, r--" Ñ Ó Ó Ñ Ñ -.D v1 0\ '<t- 1'-' Ñ Ñ r--" M or. ",' r-: ó 00· or. c.:: = ~ ... - ¡,.¡¡ .. ¡.¡ '<t I'- ,.., 00 \C '<t \C V) '" N '<t N '<t 0 ° I'- N I'- 0 V) IX> ... =- \C I'- .... 00 \C M C). N I/') M M ~ 0 ~ ..c .... >. ~ ;: - 100 " = ::I ~ ::I - 0 :e u = .... ~ = Q, .. ~ .; ¡,.¡¡ .... ... ... 0 0 0 = 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = " .. 0 0 0 = 0 0 = CO 0 0 0 = 0 0 CO CO 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO = 0 ... ~ 0\ >D r-: N N or) OÓ ..¡ r-: OÓ -.i OÓ or) 0 OÓ OÓ >D 0 0 r-: = M 00 V) M V) M V) ~ == '" \C '<t .... I'- M = \C '<t 00 - M V) '" N 00 \C ~ \C N 0 0 0 00 IX> -= '" I'- a-. ° 0 .... I'- "'. 0, '<t N V) 00 0 M '" V) ,.., \C 0 N V) V) = "'0 0 OÓ M ~ M r-: = '<to Ó ~ -.D Ó '<to 0' .,¡: Ñ a\ '<to 0' -D 0\ M OÓ Ñ ~ V) I'- V) I'- ,.., \C I'- I'- '" 00 00 '<t V) ~ '" '" I'- M \C IX> -= M V) N .... -, I'- C). ~ \C 0 M ~ M \C '<t, V) '" M ,.., '<t N '<t \C = '"' 0\ = - 0\ -.D r-: .,¡: M Ñ Ñ '<t' .,.¡ N' ,..¡ rJ:¡ .... - N .... - <¿; .t: '" 'ë ïæ "C 1:: g ~ 0 t: en ë u .g ... en '2 en t: ... en ... U "0 u ,!:; 'ã :§ ë !¡:: c o:s ~ ... <i-< ::I .;:: õ;í ~ C '" en en "0 U ... ... t: 0 '2 !) N .. ~ !¡:: .. t:: E- ,!:; ... ~ u ï: ~ <i-< .. 0 .è' 0 'ã ';: -¡¡¡ 0 o(! 1:: '" <:> 0.. ~ o(! ... ... t>O "C ë::¡ o(! e,:¡ 0.. E <:> "0 !) ... ::I E 0:1 ~ ~ r:/J !) !) 0 C t: !) en en X 0:1 '" 'E -; r:/J -; !) !) Q "2 r:/J !) -¡¡¡ t>O !) !) u ... E ::I u en t: o:s '" "0 C '" ... -; .;:¡ u .!:! 'E en t: P.. .!:! -S !) .. .s u !) -= c ¡ï: .. !) o(! 1:: o ,- :E u ë¡:j u 0 C '(3 :a u '" :is 0..:::2 t>O E :is -¡¡¡ "E en ";;j ';;: -¡;¡ = !) co .. ... !) 0 !) en ,_ t: en '" ::: '¡¡:j ... ,~ o(! ;a ::I <2 "' t: ::I is ::I t: 0 ::I !) !) !) t: ... .. e,:¡ ,;2 u :. r:/J 'C U :. ::r: !) en !) := -¡;¡ -¡¡¡ ::I ~ CO .g ::r: ..c ~ ,!:; 11 -¡¡¡ ... ..... ::: "0 Ü -¡¡¡ -¡¡¡ !) !) r:/J !) r:/J ... ... .s en t.IJ t: ... !) !) u -¡¡¡ ,:,! ... .~ .. en !) t:: ... '" !) E !) en 1:: t: !) 0() E ";;j 0.. ,:,! ";;j = .~ t: u = ::I !) = ~ ... = t: <B .~ 0.. o:s = ::D '(3 e - '(3 = .. ..c !) ... "2 .¡; ... !) !) !) = 0 = ... 0 = !) en o:s = !) 0.0 en = " Õ o:s !) t: ::I 0 0 ..J 0 ~ .... U N ..J ¡ï: U ~ ,.., v "' ~ t.IJ .5 0 '<t ~ 0... r:/J u¿: .5 r:/J I/') ~ = = = = = = = 0.. ... 0 N N "0 N M - '" ô< N N M '<t N M '<t V) \C M '<t V) \C I'- 00 ~ = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = N N M M M M '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t V) V) V) V) V) V) V) "-"-..., " ,.Q .... 00 M .-¡ Ir) 0 Ir) .-¡ \D M 0 0 0 0 .-¡ N 0-, r- - = .... e " ... ~ N 0 00 Ir) c: 0 00 0\ ~ c: Ir) c: c: c: 00 N = 111 '" Q = = 'ò'< .. M 0' -D N M 00 N 0\ 00 ,.¡ r-: ..,t r-: r-: N ~ " " .... M - N M - 0 c. = 0 .. ... ¡,,¡¡ .. = N .. = Õ .. ¡,,¡¡ ~ .. " ÔÕ ;.. .... " " ~ '<t 0 111 '<t 0 0 111 \D 0 M 0 0 0 0\ N .-¡ 111 OIJ " M N c: 111 Ir) 0 c: ° "'? N 0-, 00 0 0 0 ~ c: - = oj ¿¡ ,.Q 00 0' OÖ ..,t 0' or) 0' 0' N 0 0 0 N r-: or. "- e " M - - Ir) " '<t Ir) - 0 N I,Q '<t 00 r- ° 0 0 - 0 - - = = " .. Ir) N 0\ M r- N .-¡ M 0-, 0 Ir) 0 = r- r- ..,. - = .. Ir)^ ~ Ir)^ ~ or) ..,¡ Ó ~ 0\ r-.:' ..,¡ ~ Ó Ó ,.) ..,t r-: N r-: " = = M Ir) N - 0-, Ir) \D M 0-, M \D 0 Ir) Ir) = ° r- OO 00 ;;¡ o. .-¡ \D '<t "i 0, r- \D N '<t M '<t. 111 ..,. M N' .,j M N' r-: 0' ¿ ..; \D r- ..,. - " " \D 0-, 0 111 \D 0 0-, 0 111 '<t S r- ° 0 0 - 00 0-, r- 111 = .. .. ;!: \D r- ° "": '<t 0 0\ 0 ..,. r- ° 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 0\ " .. 0 0 0 - 0' 0 0' 0 0\ 00 0 N 0 0 0 - 0\ OÖ .. ,.Q .. M Ir) S e Q Ir) Ir) 0 = 0-, M 0 .-¡ 0-, r- OO '<t '<t 00 00 '6 = "'l 00 Ir) r- M r- OO 0\ 0-, 0 = \D N 00 00 = " ~ M OÔ o· N ~ or) M .,j 0-,' r-.:' r-: ~ ~ .,j OÓ = .. 00 = 00 I,Q " ¡,,¡¡ 0\ r- 0\ r- M N Ir) 0-, \D M c. .. r- .-¡ M .-¡ r-: ... ~ " '<t N N N .,j ¡,,¡¡ ;.. or) - - '" = 0 " .-: " 0 M 0 .-¡ r- ° 0 ° r- ° 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = ..,. '" .. = Ir) Ir) 0 = N 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = = .. N 0' 0 N N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = 0\ .¡: = .. '6 ,.Q 0 M ..,. M .-¡ = Q. = e \D r- .-¡ - ~ 0 111 ~ = '<t^ r-^ N N' N - .. " Q. e = N .-¡ ..,. Q. - ;; ¡,,¡¡ 0\ -< .-¡ 0 r::: '" "C = ï: = ';j¡ '" '" .. I, ;; e.- = ø; '" ~ .. .. " " ~ ~ .. \D \D 0 M 0\ 0 0-, 0 00 '<t 0 r- ° 0 0 - 00 0\ r- - 0 .c = ... Ë "'! ° ..,. 0 0-, 0 - r- ° 0 0 ~ 00 0-, 00 0\ = e ¡,,¡¡ :¡; .... 00 0 0\ r-: 0 0' 0 r-: 00 0 N 0 0 0 - M or) 0\ 0\ '" = ~ ë = '<t 0 111 \D M 0 = 0\ r- OO '<t '<t 00 r- 0 e.- " " r- Ir) .-¡ N r-, OO^ 00 0\ 0 = \D N 00 r- ï: " c. 00 ...:; ó ¿ ..,¡ ,.) ~ r-.:' r-: ~ .,j r-: ~ = ~ ... Ir) M ~ f;¡i¡ " ¡,,¡¡ 00 0\ r- 111 0-, r- M = N Ir) 00 0-, \D I,Q 00 .... =- '<t r- .-¡ N M "'!, .-¡ r- 0 ,;; ..c .,j ¿ ;;., I, ;: Ir) - - .. " = = ~ = - 0 :s u = = I, Q. " >< -= f;¡i¡ ... .. 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = = .... " .. 0 0 c: = 0 0 c: 0 ~ 0 0 c: 0 0 0 = 0 c: = = 0 .... ... = 0' 0 = ..,t 0' M or) - 00 0 Ir) 0 0 0 ,.¡ -D r-: ~ I, = 0\ r- Ir) M 0 N Ir) = '<t 0 '<t 0 0 0 0\ Ir) Ir) = = :i 00 0 \D I,Q r-, '<t 0, .-¡ M 0 N 0 '" 0 = M 0\, .-¡ = "C oo^ or) or) 0\ ..,¡ ~ M .,j r-^ or) ~ Ó 0 ¿ '<t' M OÓ ~ I, N r- 0\ Q\ 0\ N 0 .-¡ N M N 0 Ir) Ir) 0\ 0 '<t '<t ..c '" M = r- \D 111~ c:. \D N '<t '<t '<t '" 0\ M e.- M N^ ~ M M r-: '<t' .,j ~ rL;¡ r- r- 111 - '" ] " E-< ;; ~ = ... .. .E ... -= ë " E .. 0. 0. U <> S 0. 0; u ;:j 0; o¡ .... .;; Q. c: u ~ Q 0; :a c: 0 .... .. <> ;; .... <> ü æ ~ Cl.. C/J .. ë c: c: .. ::J: OJ "5 "5 '" c: <> 0; ~ § :; .. 0 E E l;:: o(j C <> 0 0 c: c: ... .¡¡; ~ "'0 0 u 0 .. ~ 0. ;:j '" c: c: c ... '" '" .~ <> .. C c: 0 ï: Œ: ;>-. 0; '" .... .... '" § <> ::J: 0; -;: ~ ~ ê¡j CI: '2 ~ Õ = ,....:¡ :> -;¡; Q. ... .8 <> <> .. '" '" ~ ~ <> ~ ,;; 0 µ,:¡ .. S c '" '" "'0 ~ o:¡ ~ æ c '" .... N <> <> c ;:j t:i3 0; = u t: ~ <> Q c S o:¡ .... 0 :a ;>-. I .... .... = = <> .. o(j .. .~ <> <> <:;::; ~ u = f-; f-; '" ... i::G µ,:¡ '" ""ª u Q <> ;;. c: .!:! c: Q ... õi =- ~ 'ê "5 u <> 0; 0; U <> "Z "'0 "'0 ,.. o(j è -;¡; c .... .D ð'U õ ~ c c: ... .... <> õ <> c a a " '2 0 ï: i::G '" '" '" 2 0. c: - <> u = .:.: .... = æ 0 c: = 0. .- a c: = .... ~ = " .... ::: "3 0 E .~ '" fd <> " '" = 0 u 0 = ~ <> 0 = .5 ] = Cl.. ,....:¡ U I,Q ~ U µ,:¡ U r- µ,:¡Q f-; i::G U 00 0\ ::E co = = = = co 0- - 0 '" N ~ N M N \D '" ¿,; M Ir) N M '<t r- N = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :::; = \D \D \D r- r- r- r- oo 00 00 00 00 00 0-, 0-, .-........, '" 0 0 N , Õ V) 0 M -.D 0 0 M V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 t- '.D t- N 0 0 t- '<t 0\ N '<t ~ 0 <6 00 t- N N 0 N 0 0 00 ~ .. ... '.D ~ ~ '.D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N '.D 0\ ~ ~ '"': 0\ 0\ '<t 00 0 M '<t r-: ~ t- ~ ~ ~ V) .. .. <= - N N ....; r-: 0\ 00 0\ 0\ ..t N 00 V) V) -.6 -.6 M N N Q = 'fe .. N = OJ) " " .s .. e "0 "" ;;¡ .. .. = '" 0- 0 ... .. .. = .. g:: .. .. ... t- '<t 0\ t- O 0 N 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0\ 0\ 0 t- OO 0 V) 'D 0 '<t t- t- 0\ 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 "0 M '<t 00 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t 00 M '<t 0 M V) M N 00 N M M 0\ M 0 0\ M 0 0\ .. 00 0\ 0 0 M 0\" 0 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 '.D N ~ '.D" 0 V) N N. M t- M '<t" 00 0 V) t- V) t- O 0 '<t .!:! .. 00" '<t. v) v) O· r-: 0" N" v) O· Ó O· O· '<t" ....; '.D" v) 0" 0" '<t" O· '.D" 00" V)" 0\. N· v) ....; O· OÔ .. .. - M - M = 0 M N M V) '.D '<t M t- t- M 0 00 0 N 00 M M '<t N t- 'D - t- '.D t- V) 0 '<t V) V) '<t 0 N V) .. .. 0 0 t- '.D t- O N" t-" N" V) '.D 0\ N N '.D M 00 M '.D N 00 0\" 00 V) 0" ... .. r-: '.D. N· r-: r-: V). Ñ '<t. N" '<t. v) ....; = M ;¡ = '.D N M '.D r.:. 0\ 0\ N 0 M V) 0\ '<t t- r.:. M d-- <6 0 0 <6 t- ~ '.D V) N N t- OO 0\ V) N '.D '.D '<t 00 0 t- N M 0\ 0\ 0 N 0\ N .. 00 00 0\ O. 0 00. 0\ '<t '<t. '<t t- 0\. '<t 0 M 00 0 0 M M N '.D V) Q .. M ....; v) O· M r-: OÔ N· M N" 0\ O· '<t" O· N" v) v) 0" 0\" 0\" OÔ .s .. N '.D M N N N M 0\ 'D N 00 0\ V) t- = = 00. N '.D ... .. .. .. .. .. ... g:: '" ~ 111 = S2 '.D r.:. 0\ 0\ N 0 M V) 0\ '<t t- r.:. M d-- <6 0 0 <6 t- = .. M ~ - .. '.D V) N N t- OO 0\ V) N '.D '.D '<t 00 0 t- N M 0\ 0\ 0 N 0\ N .. ~ ... = 00. 00 0\ O. 0 00" 0\ '<t '<t" '<t t- 0\. '<t 0 M 00 0 0 M M N '.D V) ~ t- :¡;¡ = M - v) Ó M t-. 00" N" M N· 0\. Ó '<t. O· N" v) v) 0" 0\ 0\" OÔ cz:: Q ë .. N '.D M N N N M 0\ 'D N 00 0\ V) t- C\ .. ·C <= .. 00. N '.D -; ~ g:: 'ÕÌJ = ... .... r.¡ ;; -< "0 .. ~ ~ "0 = .:I: = ¡.;¡ Q C\ "0 = ~ <= C\ ~ ï: ~ .... .. C\ =- ... .5 ..c Q .... ë - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 t- '<t 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0\ 0 00 .... '" <= .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 N '.D 0 V) 0 0 N 0 t- N 0 ¡,.¡¡ ~ OJ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 '<t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.D t- o. ~ o. 0 0 N. t- oo 0 N 00. o. 0\ 0 M t- t- o 0 .... "0 V). o· v) Ó V). o· r-: v) ó ó v) o· Ó o· o· ..¿ N· oô ..¿ 0" 0" 00" o· ..¿ v) o· ....; v) N" o· t-" = ... = V) V) M M = Q = N '<t N 0 M V) N t- M 0 t- M 0 00 0 N V) '<t '<t N t- o '.D N V) V) N M '<t '.D 00 0 M M - 00 0 t- '.D t- N o. N. 00. N. V) '.D 0\ M N '.D '<t N M V) N o. 0\. V) Q .... Q 00" '.D. N· r-: r-: Ñ '<t" v) ....; u = V) M V) M ~ '.D N E .. ~ -= .... ... C\ <= .... .... rn <:> ;:; <!) '" '" <!) ta ~ ¡:r¡ E- e- '" .... 0 <!) 1::: U ~ & ~ E- 0 ._ Ë 0: 5 rnëdrJJ µ.:¡ § .~ ëa '" :õ ~æo: '" <!) ~ E- -<..., ~ 0 <!) ~ :>( _t:: 0 ro :.:3E- ~ ..5 ~ :Ë Ë ~ ëaaëa ~ ~ g 0...0.......J Õ b '" c:: <!) 0 ~ U E-ëa ~ a -5 "is 0-< '" <!) '" <!) <!) u... '" <!) öIJ <!) u... c:: <!) :§ u... ·a <g ¡:r¡ 0 -0 ~ æ ~ 0 ] .~ ~ ] ....Jo...u...u '" ~ ~ öIJB .... .- ta ~ ..c:: .... U 0 ....u... c..-o o c:: u ta o '" - <!) o c:: ..c:: ._ 0... u... .... ....1::: <!) <!) c:: c.. o 0 ::E 0': <...,<"" o 0 ~ ~ ;:¡;:¡ a a o 2 <./::u... '" '" <!) <!) ~ ~ c:: c:: <!) <!) .. .. <!) <!) ~~ a <!) ëa ~ ¡z¡ .~ E <!) <!) ta g -0 ~¡z¡ 5¡¡~ :.:;: u .::! 0 <!) ...... .;; :õ 0': ~ ~ t¡:S"'Orn~ ¡z¡o...<!)~u '""' '""' æ 0 <E<E..c:: <!)-o rnrnrJJ]~ ~~};;o~ æ æ .5 ~ 8 ÕÕ~~~ öIJ <!) t¡¡ y-o ~:¿ .;; .... <!) ¡z¡ '" <!) '" u <!) ·E -0 e ~ :¿ g ëa ëaëa¡Z¡ _ _ u öIJ "g .g"§.§ ¡z¡ ¡z¡ öIJ c:: o:¿ o:¿ B ê ~ ~ ~ð~~ ~t¡~ rn õ)..c::õ) ã ~õ~ ¡:; ëa u .¡:: o öIJ <!) t¡¡ U <!) t¡¡ cñ "0 = = .... .. ... .. = .. í-' <!) c.. o .... 0... c:: o :>( ta E- § :5 ~ ~~ <!) u...o:¿ :>( ~ c:: ta c::.s E- ~ t¡¡ ~ :.:3"E c:: <!) 0 ~ ~ ü ~ ~:.:3E-:.ë~ ë~]>ö ~ ~ u a ~ s:: .r¡; æ õ :< 8Æ~::E~ '" <!) :>( ta E- a ~ g E-~ ~o 5 õ :J~ ..0_ o:¿ '" E (l) ::::: 0 fd ;:¡:r:E- '" -0 o o u... -0 <!) .... ta c.. <!) .... 0... ëa u .¡:: o öIJ <!) t¡¡ U s!: o Z '" <!) '" c:: <!) c.. :>( µ.:¡ -0 ~ ta ..c:: ¡z¡ .... .... <!) <!) ..c:: ..c:: ÕÕ ::E 0- 00 "0 = = .... M :3 00 ~ 0- NM'<tO NM'<tV)'Dt-ooO\o N'<tt-ooO\O-NooO '.DO '<tMO'.DNM NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM'<t'<t'<t'<tV)V)V)'.D'.D'.Dt-ooooO\O\ r '~ "'" -~ N v; o o C:' o 00 .. .... Q .E '" ... ,.j = ~ ~ ~ t; = :¡ =: .... 1i, " ~ Ö '" .. ~ .. Q .E .. '" Q, := 111 = ~ Q, .... .. ~ ... .... ~ r- :¡;; .". eo: = \C> ·c -; ë r-:- 'S¡¡ = Q\ := ::it ~ ... - ;; <.J .... -< ." c; "C .. ." ~ = = Q eo: "" = "C ." eo: Q, = ~ - ï: eo: .. ... .5 =- Q .c - ë ~ '" ¡;¡¡¡ = .". = ... ::it = := Q = Q - Õ \fS U = .... Q, N ~ .. \fS -= 111 - .... eo: .. - = 00. .. N :! r<) \C> r<) as .... r<) ..; 111 .... ~ \C> r-:- Q\ 00 ...; '" .. Õ E-- ." = .. .. " ." = = v; .. '2 .. <:> '-0 .. 0 t- o .. 0 0 = 1 N .. ] .;j " ~ c ~ ~ ~ = "€ " 0lJ :; õ 8 .5 :¿ "" 1:: c ~ ] 0 ~ 0.. ." ¡¡. :; '"' 00 = 0:: ~ ~ = '" .. 0 6ò ] ~ 0:: N-rJ PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER BUILDING PROJECT BUDGET REPORT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Northrop-Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Continqency 12/03/04 Opening Balance $ 26,030,769 $ 780,923 01/27/05 Change Order (001) 21 ,065 (21,065) 01/27/05 Change Order (002) * 53,835 - 01/28/05 Progress Payment #1 (1 ,456,157) - 02/24/05 Progress Payment #2 (403,222) - 03/24/05 Progress Payment #3 (375,678) - 05/13/05 Progress Payment #4 (855,272) - 06/10/05 Progress Payment #5 (401,210) - 06/20/05 Change Order (003) - Establish Guaranteed Maximum Price (51,387) 51,387 06/28/05 Change Order (004) - Foundation change 319,034 (319,034) 07/14/05 Progress Payment #6 (378,417) 07/27/05 Progress Payment #7 (445,669) 08/10/05 Progress Payment #8 (759,513) Balance at August 11, 2005 $ 21,298,178 $ 492,211 * The funds to be used for change order #002 were taken from departmental E911 funds. Submitted By, Rebecca Owens Director of Finance Approved By, . If. Elmer C. Hodge £p County Administrator N-8 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER BUILDING PROJECT CHANGE ORDER REPORT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA hanqe Order Number Date Approved Description of Change Order Amount 001 January 27,2005 6 GHz Microwave and Vinton Related Costs $ 21,065 002 January 27, 2005 Delete several CAD servers, add CAD and related CAD software (paid from departmental E911 funds) 53,835 003 June 20, 2005 Establish Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) (51,387) 004 June 28, 2005 Revised foundation due to soft soils 319,034 Total as of August 11,2005 $ 342,547 Submitted By, Rebecca Owens Director of Finance Approved By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator '.1-' ....... -- o z E Q) ...... ~I.O o 0 c.~ () ('f) D::N rn if) ... :J rn C) o :J ()4: ~2 "'C co ::::J 0 ... C) tJ) c:: :p == Q) ns Q) .,::E >. -e .0 Q) "'C~~ Iii .:: Z a..~E Q) ..... .- ",,::JQ) ......«0::: (3. 0 ~ ~ Q)I o ..... ...J1tI ..r:::. QjC/) ..r:::. Õ >. "E ::J 8 ~I Q) ItI ~..r:::. 0C/) c:: ItI o 0::: _"E ItI ::J .....0 o E 1-« ...- I'- co Ll) ...- I'- N (J) ~ ...- v (J) v ...- o o o o ...- N V ...- Q) õ Z I I c:: ItI ã: UI c:: o t5 Q)- .....- ..... Q) o 3= üo -ea.. !J Q)-e (I) UI-e oltlw 000>. >..?:-.o 'tJc::-e ~ ::J Q) ... E ..... enE~ :: 0 Q) ~üct o o N ...- v r-: I'- o o co co Ll) N V o o o o o o N ...- ...- Q) õ Z ~ c::~ .!!!C/) a.. I E >. 1tI.o .....-e OJQ) o ..... ..... ItI a..c. = Q) ItI ..... """)a.. o (J) o ~ o (J) o N v_ (J) co Ll) N co o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 v Ll) as 0 N (J) ...- UI c:: o ~ -e c:: o U :~~ OJ:>, .ç: E 00 ::J .- 0 ~ ~ü~ 0~C/) :>,0 I -e c:: >. ::J ItI .0 00 &. >. w -g <Šû5 ...- I'- o I'- Ll) V o ...- o - . VUI o.~ o -e N::J -00 ~Q) ..... UI Q) Q) .o..r:::. 0..... 1:)0 OQ) -em Q)..r:::. roC/) ï:::::: >. c. ..... o c:: ..... ::J c.o c.ü ItI Q) N~ NO (J)c:: Lñ¡g ~O::: Q) £ - o UI 00 o U Q) £ - o Q)- ..... >. 1tI-e -;;.a .= C/) Q)w £;:¡: 0- - c:: UI ItI Q)- ._ a.. 5 E E ~ c:: OJ 3= e o a.. .....- Iii Iii ..r:::. """) ;Q) Q)£ ro-e ï:::::: c: c.1tI e c:: c.1tI fij-ã: Q) UI > 5 1tI·- ..r:::.1:) UI Q) Q) ::: :õJ0 ~ü U-e o Q) -;:UI ::J ItI 000 ->. Q)~ ..r:::.c:: ..... ::J oE ..r:::.E U 0 &Jü ...- Q) õ Z v Ll) 0 0 ~I 0 0 N N N ...- ...- ...- ..... ~ Q) .0 ItI 0 ::J 1:) c:: 0 ItI """) 00 0 00 0 00 C') 00 N 00 N 00 M ...-N ...- 00 00 00 00 00 cici ...-N (I) c:: o ;:¡ c. o 'tJ c:: ca ....I 'tJ c:: ca (I) .!!! 'tJ ~ ... en Q ... Cñ ë; ""') Ll) o o N Q) c:: ::J Q)""") :'!:C: C/) .- -e E Iii 1tIc. £Q) 0.0 .00 c::..... 'ÕJ c:: OJO Iß. c::0 0-e c:: c:: 28 c.Q) OC/) .f"... )'\;.' '........, . _;1.". :~ ". <.¡ 8::f c..;Z N N C') ...- Q) ."!: Q) C/)~ EC/) ItI E ..r:::.1tI .......r:::. 0..... .00 c::.o .- c:: OJ._ OJ OJ .- OJ I·- _I 0_ >.0 -e>. ::J-e ..... ::J C/)..... -C/) 1tI_ ..... ItI c:: U Q).- E c:: c::..r:::. o U ..... Q) .:;; Õ c:: Q) wC> > '---, >- -e .c Q) "D~~ ë¡¡ ï:: E c...~E Q) +-' .- cc::JQ) <Co::: o "- I- 0 ~ ~ Q)I o "- ...J ro ,,-£ Q)C/) £ Õ >- 1: ð Q)I ü"- Q) ro ..1<:£ 0C/) c:: ro o 0::: _1: ro ::J -0 o E I-<c I ~I o o Ii) N 0) N o o o o o a:i 'V o o Ili N 0) N o o o o o a:i 'V I/) Q) U .~ Q) C/) c¡¡ C) Q) ...J Q) I/) ::J Q) "- ::J ::; - "- 0- - >- Q)ë: ~O C/)_ =:g ~U C).z:. c:: c:: ~ð 'x ü UJQ) -..I<: o 0 >-c:: -ero ::J 0 -0::: C/)_ - - -c:: o 2- Ii) o o N ..- ..- ~ ro ::J c:: ro . I/) Q) U .~ :ß Q).!:2 I/) C/)~iij "- Q) 0 ~C/)Ü '> ãj ~ ~~æ c¡¡ð¡¡¡ .- ü I/) u _ æ-g:ë .!: 0 Q) LLCCO o o CO 'V ..- cD 'V o o o o o CO 'V o o ex) 'V ..- 'V 0) N Q) Õ z iij o Ü c:: o :æ .!:2 C. a. <c -e c:: ro I/) .~ -e ::J èñ - o iij o Ü N Q) Õ z Q) £ - .z:. 0~Q)_c:: iijro£O::J O£"->-O u~.E:!:ü Q) ::J >-15 Q) £c...-gëñ-ð "-o_c::c:: Q)-I/)oro ð§c¡¡g.o U:¡::¡UQ)O::: 0.'- "- .9o.ÉQ).9 C)Q)u£-e ,!: £ l\! -; ~ - +-' 0'- ..... æOQ)>-::J E';C)2E ~ iij -g C/) '~ 08ro.z:.,,- NQ)ãj:=O .,...:£"-,Q:ß ~ - "'C en ._ Ciic::ro~ ~>ro~c¡¡ ro 0 Q) U êU:¡¡¡~.2 ~.9Q):::::~ Q)O£O:¡::¡ ..ctn,+-_rn - c¡¡ 0 :g ,Q. ro -e ~ U ,!:2 c:: t ~ro~~ro O=rol-o. I/)ro£ "- '~ · e::.. en ~ Q)E_Q)I/)õ o.Q)c:: ::IC¡¡Q)gQ) C/)C/)E"-£ ___1/)0.>- o>-I/)C::.c "E 1: ~ ,Q -e ro::ll/)roQ) oo<cu(¡¡ ccüc¡¡'E.£ .z:. Q) - 0. I/) c:: ..I<: ffi ro Q) ðgEQ).c Ü ro c:: £ >- oo-ro Q)"",,,-"-E ..I<: LL.. '>.E 0C)c::-~ æ ..§ UJ :g :g o,~ Q) U U o:::x£-e-e Q)Q)-Q)Q) £Q)Ororo -£ü)Cüëi) >-a,+- 0 ..... ..... .cou>-"- -eQ)Q)C::Q) ~:!:::..c:ca£ rol/)--eO '~~ .2[ æ ~ e:::::i:ñiñl-::>, 0.0 I/) :!: o.>-EQ)::>'o ro-erog1:£ rJJ:J£.....:J"S ~èñ.8 o.0<c >>-c::c::ü= 8 :!::: ·51·Q Q) ro = C)ro..l<:· O_,Q ._ U 0 Q) fÈgjI'E.æ£ N Q)~ 0.,9 >- ~LL_roLL...c N-9 "- o ro "- ~ c:: E -e <c >- 1: ::J o ü N 1: ro iij ëñ I/) <c ui ,~ :D E ro £ ü c:: £ o . >- .c -e ~ E .c ::J C/) ACTION NO. N - \0 ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Preliminary unaudited results of operations for the year-ended June 30, 2005 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge êlf County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Finance is currently working through the year end process and preparing for the annual audit for June 30, 2005. Preliminary unaudited revenues for the County operations for the year ended June 30, 2005 are projected to exceed budgeted revenues by $1.9 million (or 1.4% of general fund operating revenues). The additional revenues collected were primarily from increased tax collections in the areas of real estate, recordation and conveyance tax, bank franchise tax and cellular phone tax. This is attributed to a more positive economic climate. A detailed analysis of the general fund revenues is outlined in Attachment I. Based on the Policy for Use of General Fund Revenue in Excess of Budget at Year End as approved during 2004-2005, revenues in excess of budget will be allocated first to the General Fund Unappropriated Balance, until the maximum amount for the current year is met which is 8.5% of general fund revenues as specified in the General Fund Unappropriated Balance Policy. Of the $1.9 million of excess revenues projected, $1.1 million will be added to the General Fund Unappropriated Balance and the remaining $805,911 allocated to the Major County Capital Reserve. Most of these revenues were anticipated during the 2005-2006 budget preparation, were discussed with the Board, and included in the current year's budget. 1 (\'\ I i/ -/ ) Based on the Policy for Use of Unspent Expenditure Appropriations at Year End departments are able to request up to 60% of the savings within their own department for special purchases and programs approved by the County Administrator and the remaining 40% reverts to the Minor County Capital Reserve for future capital projects. For the year ended June 30, 2005 it is estimated that $782,550 will be available to transfer to the County Minor Capital Reserve based on the rollover policy approved by the Board. Of this amount, $310,325 was a one time savings on the first year principal debt payment of the Public Safety Center Building. Below is a preliminary unaudited summary of the General Operating Fund Revenues and Expenditures: County of Roanoke, Virginia Summary of General Operating Fund Revenues and Expenditures For the Year Ended June 30, 2005 Budget Actual Revenues: Revenues $ 137,353,349 $ 139,317,110 $ Transfers In 3,392 3,392 137,356,741 139,320,502 Amount 1,963,761 1,963,761 Estimated Transfer to Major Capital Reserve per policy Excess Rescue Fees( Requires board action for appropriation) (805,911 ) (54,393) Addition to General Fund Unappropriated Balance 1,103,457 Preliminary General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2005 Adjusted General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2005 11,808,285 $ 12,911,742 Expenditures: Budget Actual Amount Expenditures and encumbrances Transfers Out $ (65,185,348.00) $ (64,147,472.00) $ 1,037,876.00 (76,179,087) (75,823,750) 355,337 (141,364,435) (139,971,222) 1,393,213 Uses of unspent expenditure appropriations: Estimated Departmental rollover per policy Estimated Transfer to Minor Capital Reserve per rollover policy (610,663) (782,550) (1,393,213) The Finance Department will continue to work through the year end process and will provide the next preliminary report at the September 27, 2005 Board meeting. A final report is expected at the end of October. 2 E " E .J;;; u '" to: « 1/1 ïii ~ cv ~ ~~ g cvE Q cv :J o E I: ~ :J ~ .....CI)Q OQ~ ~:JLO 1:;0 :J>o OQ~ UD::~ o N >- U. II) 1: II) ..... Q "È.~.§ .... Q II) J¡z" 'c « ~~:g æ~CD ~ Q. ~ o::::);g -c ~Ù).w -c "È..g " .... Q ~J¡c ::) _II') iij ~9 c:-c;g ¡¡">- caLL II') ",0 ,a"; UO «>- LL 211') '01'0 ~it LL CD CII ;.2'01' .cMO 00>- ~itLL .. III ':'.2<') S~~ >-LL =11.. >- .2N ... 0 0>- tLL ~m06·~N~~_~~~m~li~~o~ N ("') Co 1- 1-. N CO 0 CO L() LO CO CO r--- 0 <D I>!, en N -.::r I£) Q (",1 N LO cry N CO N 1.0 (J) (1:'1 CO ..... 01 "oo.. ~ cD l!~: ç.j ,-"": a) ~ ci w- u) ri M \.í.i- ri ,..: I:-~~ a.ñ comC·J~~~MNML()MIDON~MNo~ _ b9 ':'.J '.....::. L"""') W N b9 N b9 b9 ,...- b9 VJ tß ..... ..--' tIJ. b9 Œ-~0 b9 b9 b9 - ~m ~ CO " M (oj ö C.t 0> (....Jl.¡r') -=-(1') ,i~,- '<I" (J r- '~L() 1.1':' l.i) '-'W --·W 08.0000'0·00 o "î 0 0 0 Ci C, 0 0 O:)jOOOC¡'~oo Ó "7': ui ci ui l:.-; u-; Ò 0 LOQ:ICJ)I.OM"""'--"":t"C')C() M"- N u") '-' 0000MOOOOlt') C,OQOf'--OOLOOCO c· 0 0 0 lD c") <.D LO L() J'.. i..;.-) LÕ 0 Ô ,......- ,......- Ñ cñ (""""J(!)l{)(J')......c.c <ON ('\ ,.- I~·_·O 0 :2 It')O N (J) ('\It') u-i~ M It') W ("o. 0" 6-: cO" r- 1.0 ..- L() L() .q CD 0 ..- - 0 CD o rJ ;..... r·- co 0 co l() 1.0 co co 0 0 (c M (J') -,0 C; ,-, c- It') M ('\ CO ('\ It') (J) CO ~ r- It') ('\ C~ (".j C~; r ~ -..:;Ç ~ ci T"""- Ó M M ~ ~ ....: 0- ~ ··J(""·lt'.....i"-CO(!)C'1 C'}I.O- ON<Df'- .~ - -:J _ ("') ,.... ("')..... CD ~ -L'11"'- '"''<I" ..-r"J" ci ("-j ...... .-.It') O(DOOOOOOoooooooooo-~-O O'<l"OOOOOOOOOOO'<l"OO~lt')N~lt')O OCOOOOOOOOOOOOr-N(J)(J)<')('\(J)(J)O ~~OO~O~O~~ôô~~m~~~~~~O r-~lt')Or-lt')('\~(J)(,\~O(J)~(J)Olt')CO~COWr- V~N~~OV"""'.....IDroOM~~~ro~N~Œ~ ....¡lO~""'I'-..¿LÓ ~ ~ N~r-~ CÓ('")r- W('\ W ~~roOr-N~lOr-~~~~Or-r-O~lO~~M ~~~~~~~gæ~~~~~g~~~~~~~ O~m~~Nm~~IDöMro('")Ó~~Ñ,,",ro~~ ~W~r-mr-ONNN(J)lt')OWOM~W(J)lt')lt')('\ O~r-M~~~ro~~mM~~~~Œ~r-Nm~ u1~~C'1I'--'¢~~ ~ ~ Ñr-~~ mM-r- W('\ W ~~~~~***~*~~~*~~**~~~~ ~mONN~M~~~Nr-OŒm~mWO~I'-M ~~~MID~ÓNŒ~~~~~N~~~mÓ~~ I I I'- I ~ N I N I ~ ***~~*****~~~~~~~*~~** O~OI'-MroO~OMN~O~M~mr-r-~m~ ~~~6~~MM~9MOO~m~~~~~~~~ ,*,*,*cfl.#cfl.?fi,*,** COWr-Mlt')Olt')W'<I"W tOMLOL06còMOmN ~ ""; '*?ft.cfl.cficficfi*- Olt')r-MWr-~ ~~~6~a>6 MI~~"'fC'1 ~~~~~ ~~~~~ a¡>~C'1""";U:; ****# ,....M~N 0 c.ó""':O";Lri *~'$.*-**'$.*~~** 1'-~l'-aN~C'1M~~Nm "¿'C"'ÏNNMM"¿'c.riccicóo~ IN NLl{V '$.*?ft'$. r- 0'> CD ro c.óu?~ui >< ~ ro 0 ~ Ñ Q u ~ ><æ £ Q) :g ~ãJ :g ~ Q) ë >< Q» U) 0" Q) ~~ ~~><ê§ ~~~~~ ~ I£~~~Q)~~O ~~~~~~~U) ~ @Q)~@IDêU)Q)~~~ ~)(~~æ~O::ø~ E ~g.t:~E~:E.!!!ro~ ¡g~U)'t:>-(/)g¡8:;¡¡ U) ~~W~~·-UUC_ o-~~~~o ~ w ro~g..!!!§;æ~B~~&~~~oS¡g~~ ~ ~ê~~o:g~>~~~~32æ~~ªIDOEroQ) ~ 0 \- ;::;. C ~ ~ - t.J) - ~.- t.J) 0 C') Q) > ~:J C ~~ID~='~~B8!~ªQ)~ww~u8E~~ CI) Q) Q) -£ 0 'Z :J ~ 0 WOW Q) :5 Q) C t.J) ..c .~ Q) 0 Q) Q) ~ ~~O~~mm~~I~OO~~~O~~O~~ 0:: "TM ('... 0'> ,···M I~:-~ 10 <') N ,.: o .... ... <ð II') N II') cD II') CO <ð ... 10 r-:. <') 10 O!. ... .,. N CO q ... N "1- "" M .... .,. ~ CO .,f CO N ai <') ... .,. ~ ... II'i ::e ~ ..¡ ::e ~ II'i ::e ~ ..; CD " r::: CD > CD 0:: iij Õ I- o o o (J) It') W It') M (J) It') W It') M U) ~ c " ~ ID ~ Õ E o ~ ~ U) c: œ ~ 10 <') N "" o .... ... .,. '" N It) cD '" CO .,. ... IQ r- M ~o ~ .... ~/} .... '01' "". IQ II') <') ,.: M ... .,. N <:> II') Ó N <') ai <') ... .,. iij õ ~ -c c: ~ C) M (J) ~ '<I" It') Eß o M (J) M i o o ~ o r- "è M (J) ~ '<I" ('\ W. ~ Q Q) ~ Q) ::! U U) Q ~ Q) u .~ Q) (/) .... S Q Q) ~ u; U) Q ~ ~ CO Ñ '" o ... <ð '" N It) cD II') CO .,. CO 10 <') ai <:> 01. ... .,. :; "" cD CO "" .n <') .... .,. 01 o .... cD 01 IQ r..: <') .... .,. </I CD Q) LL CD " U II) Q) 0:: C) c: ~ " ü )( Q) '" õ ~ -c c: ~ C) èñ -g* ~~ 'õ;N .... >- m]! Q '" '?'E :E 'X E e £!R <D '" ~ C '0 <D II) <D OIL> ~ <D .... > 01 '" Q~ >-'0 53 ~~ <D II) ~ <D - ~ £!~ "ª ~ 01-1 E-¡( Sea c: ,~ Q)~ ~~ II) e ~ 0> '" . ~~ ¡(~ ea '- _ <D o II) ,Q £ 1)3 ~ 0 ..u..c: II)Q);: .2!C(~ o z~ l' . Æ- ii . o ~ ~ .i2, ~ 0: u c ¡ ~ >' :g o N õ¡ Õj ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P- \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Joint work session with the Planning Commission to provide an update on development of the master plan for public facilities SUBMITTED BY: Elmer C. Hodge t11 County Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the July 12, 2005 work session, the Board agreed to begin the process of creating a master plan for Roanoke County public facilities and services. This work session will continue the discussion and will focus on the participants, scope, and organization of this process. Staff will discuss scheduling of future meetings. Staff will present the completed Roanoke County Facilities Inventory which provides detailed information on each County facility, as well as topographical and aerial maps of County properties. Members of the Planning Commission have been invited to attend this meeting. Table of Contents A. Administration 1. Administration Center B. Facilities in Salem 2. Roanoke County Courthouse 3. Salem/Roanoke County Jail 4. Court Services Building 5. County Garage 6. Salem Bank and Trust Building C. Kessler Mill Complex 7. Public Service Center Wash Bay 8. Roanoke Valley Regional Fire and EMS Training Center Tower/Burn Building D. Libraries 9. HQ/419 Library 10. Bent Mountain Branch Library 11. Glenvar Branch Library 12. Hollins Branch Library 13. Mt. Pleasant Branch Library 14. Vinton Branch Library 15. Blue Ridge Library E. Public Safety 16. Public Safety Center (Peter's Creek Rd.) F. Fire and Rescue Stations 17. Vinton Fire Station 18. Vinton First Aid Station 19. Cave Spring Fire Station 20. Cave Spring Rescue Squad 21. Catawba Fire Station 22. Hollins Fire and Rescue Station 23. Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station 24. Bent Mtn. Fire and Rescue Station 25. Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Station 26. Fort Lewis Fire Station 27. Masons Cove Fire and Rescue Station 28. Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station 29. Read Mountain Fire and Rescue Station G. Parks and Recreation H. Other Facilities/Properties 30. Old William Byrd School (Roanoke County Career Center) 31. Taylor Tract (Merriman Rd.) Roanoke County Administration Center BUILDING PROFILE Address: 5204 Bernard Drive Year of Original Construction: 1978 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1993 Square Footage of Current Building: 64,520 Acreage of Site: 3.39 Tax Map Number: 087.07-03-08.00-0000 Zoning: C2C Current Use: Administration, Board of Supervisors, Community Development, Commissioner of the Revenue, County Attorney, Economic Development, Finance, Human Resources, Management and Budget, Payroll, Purchasing, Public Information, Real Estate Valuation, Risk Manager, Treasurer, Registrar Department of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Roanoke County Administration Center o 25 50 I I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties J"". , " F & W OFFICE PARK II o 7J Ac. GORIA JOSEPH B 1.57 Ae , ..1 . 7 S&s HEALTH CARE INC 0,45 Ac " ','") lUTINS HARVEY S 0.92 I\c 087.07 -03-08.00-0000 5204 BERNARD DR 3_39 Ac i' ,:;' STRAUSS MAURY l 0.43 At: ~, ~- " - ~-,;",_ _ ~_ _ _ ~E_N~ ~OREST BL VD . ~"n . 0reo;l l=,lvC!~---- --._ COMMONWEALTH OF VA 1.17 Ae RAINY DAY PROPERTIES lLC OAe , - E~~gT~/~ /'{O , . '. ER 1 INVESTMENTS LLC ()86Ac '".(," .'- . ~} c. ARS PROPERTIESlC 0,35 Ac " ,-. ¡ 0: ,: 0, 0:' 0:,' "1i Q:' ,: W, C/J;, 8 August, 2005 tJepartment of Community Development Roanoke County Administration Center o 25 50 I I 100 Feel I I .on ,.,., ','AODON llC 0.93 Ac ~'.J ',1,; J.: C; ~(J' LAI<:EVIEW PROPERTIES L C ¿.. ~2"47 Ac ~' ~, Cfl , ,; I r FRANCO TAMEA LWlND$OR INVESTMENT GROUP LLC WINDSOR INVESTMENT GROUP LLC . OAe' OAe OAe FRANCO TAMEA L OAe' D Roanoke County Properties Roanoke County Courthouse I , ì ' -------------.....:...~ ...' íit~. BUILDING PROFILE Address: 305 East Main Street, Salem Year of Original Construction: 1985 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 71,531 Acreage of Site: 1. 77 Tax Map Number: 106-12-1 Zoning: DBD Current Use: Court and Court Services ~t- -io;) 0", ..>.0 >). 'YO ()-4~ þ.. 0"5) 'y , 'I . I. I ". --. '. , '-'-··-Y·· ---·--\-S \.Ú~ÇiÐ)3~'; . ": 1: '. \, t\ t;\ y"" 1-:," '., ,.,~·\.--:i',:- - 4.', W'" (j : y', " (j ..I " ~ \ :}, .:t!., .-~(- , 'uJ'" -i'. o ,,«-. -z" ~,I-', ',!J:', " - '4- <\,' (j, .;,(.. 'Õ' ". <t', ',~\ ~'. \ ~\ "'--'~' / 'er,,-' '" t\ "ú\ .~ "ìa" 01 \S}"Þ' t)" '-.\.$\-'\1:'t\S 4., ~\ ,- -' ---..-9._.....___. ...ri-?~ . ~ss " \ - I ""3;\';¡-B31,nß)\ \.--- :'~ -' -' .:( .", ""ý " - .-- -'I39\riiÎ"3 I- "'~-" 3!\'I;f \-\ __.- ' (/) I ___-.-.....-, 0', --,- ';J'S\ONn~\ :¡: ,,31\'v ',_ ,-,- g\ - -' ' - . ._" .n·t.~~~ëjN~ ?~~Ir.,': . ,n. " ' ,'/A¡ NÎ 3~\f' .-_ --"ï-',' .. -.-- '-:isii\NÎ'<1Mõ:.\ : .~ :';þ. . ;~ I '\ ,n__~' ..- -' -3f-~;"¡\N\D~\^ ~\ ~I. ù , " . , \ ;- .... I · I I I . I I I lee~ 009 oor oœ 0 900G '¡sn6n\f 8 ¡uawdola^ao ^¡!unwwo:) }O ¡uaWµeda0 sa!1JadoJd pa¡e:J0l wales 1...-'--: . . " , ~. :1 I,", ... i " , " Y'. , ..c·... - ~, '-.-. ~ 'i'"i.~ni-\i~3f\3~ ":. i. I I I, .!' I", '-l'S'3c?BÑþl1 I , ' , 1S' QNVl13 . 1 ,¡ .0 '.b. '~ .,' Jrj ... ". cO ~ . ~f\.'<I r; ~ 7~ . 7). '"1t-. ',>" þ.. 1-. ' 1-' ~,~ z., 7t- < þ.,' 'í: ....: ð '1t. 1-0 ~ o~., %-'"Z; '., ,-_:,-~',; ,_..~~')(\g oe( ". ',1:~'. Q..', "'. ' ' '·0', "\" \\ ..\ ,:,-,\-,,:",'-' , , Ø'J, " 0': ~ ~\ 0'\ W" ~, ~, ,*', ..I', 0\ _:, -)~Li"Ó? 3" :,~\ "\l . Ç') .1.S " ", ... Q', ' ~ ': ' "y', 0'. '~" - ~" 1/1"- '-. o Q.' " ...I.' .-' [,3'0-8\\-\1:', "'~ ~>&. ,'d.",., \ 'f' ,;))-y-.' , 01l~ -- \ Dc!-:'. 1-' .' ([)' ... ~\ , w' ", 1/1 '. ". (/'j\ ~ uJ', " "'." \, ~ ". - . .c, '~Ü\,j ". ~ ". ", l~ . " 'I ... \. t;" '. I- ". W', ::t., - It' d. " ~". ([)\ " 'H'Nö~IM\S }..ï'l;fS ", .._..>:,' _ ._, _. _ _':".:-'.. -~~ ~~,~~,~~ ~~~lti&n:'H-> _ ';' }..'1'dÐ' " ' ,.---,_ O.:iM- ~ ,H "~ l'\i~:~:¡\ , ~', ~3;';"i.~ "''''7' ù '. « >- ' ~... ._\'",' ._.- .~\ ~\ ~'" \'" /:', "_0 þ' 0, ~\ Z\ '--. is 1:5't\\:;\ ~ ~ wI., ~, 0'. I 1m 'i\, ...""-'-""-'- \..... ~\,. '1-< . ,>"',,.- . Î't!'3)\Î'dN\ U ". I ' "\'I '. '. " 1 " I. ' 3'~'t\Ç\e N\ , Ü;ÎÎ ': 1 ,,' 't\-...-- ·;.\~ôi4i~~'M I '"Y', 1-S \" , ' '-~s'-~ñO~:;¡;;¡Ó 3' ~\ ._ . -"r/'.isÑ\~~-M \ ,-''..is ~NÔ~3S':., ~~t.- t>¡~ . ~) ~-1' :.t,s>-16 , !YO~ ~~ Q <JI ~ 'ÝíJ '. ~, " ", 1:~;p;;B,:;\"3 ':, -- \t..~n~ ~ ,iO- "\1"3 '. },"J :' 1.- .,-" :: / xaldwo~ lIer pUB 'S8::>!AJeS J..lnOJ 'aSnOln.m0J ;' 'CD ::~ ,z ,'0 ~' ~ ;m ig 10 Iz I> - -< -... - - 1m 1 , ~ } .~ .'(' ,.... ~ .1 '- - -- 3^~-NÕSIi!HVI-l '.--i .' :J: o i:¡:- ::u ;1'/). '0 :z :' ;: ,m 's: "--. .'0 ':¡' "j; ,... tJ .~ :x 'Q " :r ,'en .'--i '3t..\f GN'vß^31::> , , , " , . .. '-. \. ¡SnJl. pue )tueS wales - 'I ij'-,....i'':J"3 I I , , I _," ", N13Ð,31ïo~ . _, : .' - -' l :"N'I;f100 ·'.H'" - ''}J'</ S,!'''',., . . '~~~~~~ð\~S . w' ',1 '. ~. 1-::' It ". I 1/1.. 0\ It, ~' ~\ ~. cP.' 1-"" ~. : ~' "" "/.,0" , ~. " "e.' ~ 7, ~. V, 1;4'" ~: <à" tl· v,' Q.' :it 0' ~ .'1- I j 1(j1". 'Z- \ " ~', w' 0', '-", u.!' ~", ci\ :.{ , ~ z" ~~ ·'1.rJ') }, is '?> . ., l~NN~ . 'N~01"\ C'I;L Salem/Roanoke County J ail 'I ". - -----..:..~ ~ BUILDING PROFILE Address: 401 East Main Street, Salem Year of Original Construction: 1980 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 67,834 Acreage of Site: 0.78 Tax Map Number: 107-4-1 Zoning: DBD Current Use: Jail I " I : II CLEVELAND AVe.:; ; -,.~ - - --(i-- I 'Jf. 'If: ø ! -c. . S' vC\~ ~~ . i ~'O \'\¡>"'1'J,ì~O~~' .' 'Z- \~ ,~ \\ ....'8 'm " r- .....\ ",'Z- ""~ , I /-: U)~ J:: t:>, r: -¡, .~ o 1b .~ ~ '¿ ~ .~.... ,~ " ',~ ~. - .-- '.~ ; ". ;, g: -i, $: 0:,' 0, u___~: w' ~i z, 0' (I): ~, :E' 0: :c: ~ ~ '11: .~ ,~ ,~ ...\ '... () ~ \~ '.,.... ',11 ,0 '. (/I '11 ,;.. "'~ .... \\'1'1 '. , '. ¡>..L'< S~\P~!':~,.-" . '. '~,_lJ-I!'.N-'!~:~~~?1 ~;~\, . E c).~"''{ ,~} .. -,,- ~,~m Ban~and T~st\-)\..\ ..', .",,""~, .~¡>..\NSì.'.p, '-". -- -' \ ' W w~ . --' - ,:¡::, Sí ..- \ ~ C¡\Lt\O~!"-,.-- . . . " \. ~ I, E., _0" _....-.- :, I OiJ~ s: - -' .~ c.~~~.-,; ,-' \~ : 'Ir':LLS1 " I BljaW"-. --" I IN <"..... I ... " L~ '-;, I ,',n \N¡\U<'~-~-,,-'-- (:2. - ,- , ,c. '.:¡:: ..-"'-.- " '.::I:.;" >-1 \? iF(¡ ',-::¡ , w, '0 '.~ '.\'1'1 " " , ' j J flRS1 S~.-,.. ·',z:.Y ... \0 '. " .'p s1.-", « ¡\N _.' ,- -, ' . \ (J) ", Z '< .'. 'P- S(;~<?'..~. - .-, ':, 9\.,' " "" \~ \~ - j,~ ---- '-'-""~-'- ,.~;. --'.-' . ;" "-ù ,» ',Ç.: . -:ž. '.-.' - , p..LLE'i' . }>:", '. :;¡¡ ".~ __~'I'I'-\"-;~'!.' '. .-,,- ",0 '·.m-·:'I'I '(/I 1 :;.. .\<11 . \ ~ \ -<. \1 \, "~___', - -' ,;..¡ Ir.f!', 'S','~ ' --,J~~~'~~F~L~;~:c~__ _ -'- - --.".- - \, ..ISf>,I,..'< s\~1\ft9,\"'-- "\ ; - _00. :,..,. '. L' ~~ ': \'J e.....-. E BIj~ .,'.n .-.---... \ ~ ....¡ ,).. ~' ¡!, j' H~~~!~~~ !'Y5:__. - -. I I W, >.1 « un zl 0' -- ~I æl QJ: WI >: <. 0'- z: ~ ~' QJ: , ~LA";JD ST , , , , , !' Mq~~9_~,~~':,-- Courthouse, Court Services, and Jail Complex I .' -·-'l ·,i,: . , ., I: , \ , " .1. \ r !.: n ',@ :!Š; \IIR~I\'I~fI.,"~~~-.-n-"-~·· - " /-, U)J -<..... 1 ... 1 " 05:í, $ .... Ef\~.-,,",: , \~ '. (I-s.: \~ .¢ . ~ ~1'. O..q.¡,-- ~.s'r. '; ~ (~ . ~q -1V(¡ .,?~ , ~0--t . " .~~ ...... , " ,: qt./.-. ~ "",WI'~'?- \?1.-- \r- -.\ Õ ¿y' .- " ,(J) "';, :.- .,~ 'n ',-<., , " lJ.· ) 0', , ' '1'" <II ". ',<II"" \'; '. E f;Ç>Ij~:~§,,--'-' , \,.\"" ---"~"'''-j._\\~--:-''-'' ", " ", -:;c;' .O,~ "~ ...~ ",-;0 \~ \\'1'1 '. _I.. '.'ß ~--<. " ", 'ß¡\ \;',% ~;. '\ ,,~'. \~ .... ' \0', " \ '. '\j', ....H S1 ' ". þ> SI){' _' . .", '. \'::(,"":'-' '., .... " , \ \ \ J! :¡ , 'tom" s!_. _', ¡:::.- '" 5E\I,t,. -"',,' ",f\} .., -' -.. .' , . . _-' I ~''1a ólo ~ 9z, ~ Q ?- ~ 'ý~'"1¿" , 1: '1;. --'¡ß ~ <'.... "1¿., '(.l-' ~').. ~. Salem Located Properties LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 200 400 I I I I I I 800 Feet I I ..' 'I \ \. :g1¡'Jf>,~t-1~;'.~~:;, .- _-' ,-.- :', ~._- \<.\i-AE~~ : .M~;L AÑ() ~Y'?~- -.- .--,,' - --"'~- -, . ,-n'.---'-"---~· -'\.~ -,- \{LlNq~S-!"y---.-\o _._' ,,--' '. (/I f..... -~~IZABE.~H..~'!~----\-\ ~..' :: - - . - ---'>-"~ \ ð, -' .-' --.-.-- -'I .r... " Ke.RNER_A.~¥:', 1__".- -".. I. SS~ "-fr .' ~y. " " '. " LlS':í ' - - \-\ " flf:ír~_ ,,---..' - -, \'<1.--- .,~"'_:,.-.-..... , ... "~ \,~ "\"", ;, 0"" \"S.-~ s~:~ s~, --"",: I" .\.~....::; ...- ", -a \ 'i _'. " '>~"":;'- ",~ 'i ',0 \ ',.Z \ . ,'J". '..J:' ".J" ',12 '. ' " \;n', "'~ ',,- "~ "''''-'''''0 " J>: ',1"1', ' " Ç.._. _', y' -.- ¡- " z '. ~ ,(/) ,,-_...... \.<'. ..,....., ¿ ~ 11\ ',~-..'. -' ," '. ; ~ "~ ',P _.I,_~__,. I \ i,. \ '1, \~ ;" 1: \ -=. 'I~ ' \ \ '-; ~~\G\'\~-~~' '....~"_."._.,,- '; " \ \ I %& ~Q v'2 "oS'J' ~~ . ú'v Q.. -1«.... 0#'. '90 "'J.- . -Vt-, . ~. n , , , , , ", Court Services Building· BUILDING PROFILE Address: 400 East Main Street, Salem Year of Original Construction: unknown Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 2004 Square Footage of Current Building: 19,460 Acreage of Site: 0.408 AC Tax Map Number: 107-6-1 Zonin~: DBD Current Use: Court Services, Social Services .' .:. 'i' ' -';'1.H'J~3~\", ~Sn ,-,' 1 - '1 I; ;({'; ì ";, )-"; =. ..",.- _35 I-: \ ....~" ", " , ,i!-! '" ---.'\-\Ü~3(\ (J , '" ¡.-', ',', _)-: ,''', .-~ "'" 1-5, , \ 4.\ :W': (/)\ - -.¡.-- W,', ',4,", ' ~', :..I',,, d.", ~,\. , ", (/)', ~\ O :.! -..':-s' , "W', 4,,, "I, '...", _':-,;¡:C., '4\ :J:, t>'., I, 0:,',', "',', -'''''''''":;.1-",,;'' " 'Õ "4. d. " ',<! " ',' '" "s' \Ú:)lJS 4. \ , .... ~""'" \ g'" ',i'-- . '" ~:" ,,1 \ ,,'6:, 't" "-.:) , , , '. - 0" -' .,~ W", ',,£ " ' \, "fh ", " ~,O,,,', (/)' ", ëõ..', \;;.",,--'5- ;"'1.)(1'5 u.- ',' "" 'f!. \, .." ... n ..... ,,""I¡ñ', ' , 4,.', ' "",?;' "0' \. ~'" ~\ '..,' -",-"tl\ """'... \, ,,-;,:, ~.~--- --'''-- - 9., -____ is I-\.L~I:!, ¡.-, ~ \ ~\ % '¡', W \ ~', ...!\ 'ô" ",.~', \ ", .... ",,/ "" ,,' .:._~\-~.'\ 'g'"~-",,,,!\ , -"., \-\1.1:If'O~ 3" :1" (/) " " -.- 015 ", " "', 0\ ' " ", " iP "" ", ~\ û"" '.,- '~ " .--.",....: (/), - ',- . 1-' tf;5- Q':"" -:i\ . -i5 CB\I-\ ", C, ~ì-& ',~ ',', 'Y"~...y, " 0""'''''0 ' ~""-' S cy,,,.-', SCNO,?3 " 1: \ ' , I I" I ~ ~'1f¡.. -1..y 060 . ,»,,0 J). 'Ib ()-4 ~ 1>- ~'ï¡ Y .(J' ,,~ '10 ~ IS/~ , "~~ ~Ss..¡i:. I __. - . '., 3(\';¡~3N~3~ " '.h ' ,~ .±'" ;', ,'Pi \.-.- --'ã'iiííi r- ¡. .- 3(\'11 \·U3' .__ (/) , . .-,_.... 0',·-- .-' ,,-.ïS\OÑn"}\ :I: , 3Í\V ". ~\-_. .-' ,__", \ ",,' _ __,.n --'\f,~^\r'ãÑ\i~.{~VÞ¡i~ Ni '31t'11)1 "" ....._.., ~_:,_,.' ',-n" ",;S.LÕN1'11MÖ: \ ,'" ' I, ~, ", ' -,» ;tf) ,~ \ I¿ñ.. .-' ,-';~~\ï.ÙÐ'!:I\(\ ,"- a: ", 3[\ " 4.', ~\ o J \ ", I I I I I . I , I laa=, ()()g ()()p OOl 0 900;:: '¡sn6m¡ B ¡uawdOlaMJO ^¡!unwwo:::> JO ¡uawµedan sarµadoJd pa¡e:::>ol wales ", Q.Ò~ -~f\.'<.It-' .;y T.. 71. "7", \»-~" .;y v) ,,--t:h þ.. , "7.6- "'i ~ v~ ð 't;¡ ~I-õ ~ 0<>, %,';- ., "~~~\5 /-.1:' S .',-- , .... ."-"-, ~SHi~n(:,} '-"'_ ." ,,- M..ts 114.&-'-. ',-.-- Ñ=1 j..~Ð ... " .... " ~"", nb:i~:: in'" -'-"j ~;,,~,,\,;\\\~l)\· i\, "'~i.i~S);ï:i Mi ~ -=t' 1-< ~"" i, ,,-- "- -- '(j¡': 2'" /-.31~'II '(ñ') %\_ _.-..-'~, ":t,', - -' rJi', (/) 4" , z, 0\ ' 4i" \,U, ~" Ii, ------·-1', '~-',,--~~;¡;¡3~\>;JM 0\" ~-1,... hr~ ~ -'Y "" _ ~S'1t, _.1.þ.- 0 -- '1t.;)! ~ t;t ~, 'io \ ~\ ", , """;'s'':'''\~? -.:. is.... ,0 '" , 1 !' ," ~"tl(\'d I'f\; 15113 ! ,,: ')-'" \ _. ... ._ - - _. I :~ . .:ai., P'---riô~l'11:) M , ....', 1.5 N , I ~, ' ~ ' , ~\ ... ,,---' , G" 15- ¡:¡\;;,r M ¡ \, , , -"" .....,:.;a3 -'-\131'f\0' , :, ~s , ,u - ' ", ... " .' , , - , JsnJl. pue )lues wales , - , :-.LŠ'~\t-1b3 I I - ,.' -'3110:) ", ',N13Ð, ".' "",.- , , - -- 'Iflf\Q 'P.';~1\¡ SJ..3f \ ~~~~~'\I-Id\~S ",:" ' u.I '''' ~', 'Zñ" It ex: , S" "-', ')::, '5, <i, t!}" Y"" " ~\ -- X91dw08 I!ef pue 'Se~!AJ9S lJno:) 'aSnOllJno:) ,i , " OJ i'~ :z :0 ,:~ im '00 i~ I~ -",0 ,z -- ----",-~------ ,m , , I - - '. - 3AV Ñ-OSH:!B\fH !ß ,:J ..1:. ~ "'" ,.... ~ ""-1~;3Òii-NOW " , ' , I , .~ II '0 "s:' 11,""0 ,{¡) ,:~ " B: 'm : 3:---,,-, ,:0 ';;JJ ,'j; ,r-- '6 ~ V. 'i.' g, ~. -z- - ---- Y: "" ú\ ~ ~ z.. "i is ONVl8 .. , ~, 7; ", <!." 'Z- " 0\ ... "t:', , ï» ", 7 ~', ¡ if) .À" ~: 'I 'Q " I 'tf) I:....... , , ¡.-' ' rJ>" ~\ '0', 0" ~~ W" ê2, \. It" " 4" , ~' " -:z.\ , 0"'¡\'\ ?\'J ,)..S - ¡3m ONVl3^:3iJ- --- : , I , a~"¡1:io~~t-f\~\-\ Roanoke County Garage I ~ ~ i I: \ "~~ ,,' L.. ',. ,-," ,'t:~ ~ ....." . ì" 0:. ; , ~.~t _ .. ' '.. - -.=...............,.-----.., . ~ f , . , . . . , "', - \ ..... Çl" r \.~ 'i J ..~ .--- " .' r-- .1 :. '1 I"!I - , _ _. ..-r'';''~ J ---- .__-....~ ._ :.....:. -=:,." r . ":".- -.l ~ ..; ~':'--..... :.- ~-- ... ". .- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 702 S. Market Street, Salem Year of Original Construction: 1967 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 14,460 Acreage of Site: 1.15 Tax Map Number: 160-7-1 Zoninf!: LM Current Use: maintenance, repair, inspection of County vehicles · S" cF"\{;' ~ . '~O. '. r\þ,\Nír\O~~. .' .' 1- '~ '0 Ö 'ú).. z "~ ". Y- . -;0 " ';0 . \1'1 \ 1', ",d \~ ,r '(f) . -z. ", ~ , CLEVELA~m A~E! , J¡, . "'. ~ g -~ ~ .).., <-.' ¡!. ~, ~ HARRI_S_O~ .A'!5_ ,. _, /-' u¡.: ::c: Q: ::C. "0 ~ ~ ,:;¿. ú).. ,~ L .~ .~ .Q' .,. " ,~ '. ".1"1' ': '. g -.J $: 0:; . 0,' '- - --,:E .' OJ' :E ,: 2 ' ~LA":m ST Q; (fJ, 0..' :E! O~ ::c' ~' . " Courthouse, Court Services, and Jail Complex 1-" , UJ -> ' - ' ,-- « ._," , 2;' ~ ¡ - ~ ,I IIJ' UJ' >; «, 0: 2,' èi :' 00; '. -I. '., OJ .~ \~ \t"" ',';0 ',0 '13 ".~ ',~ '1"1' ~ Þ,L '( Sr\IP~~ ','" .,n . , , , '" ' v'S þo,L'<' ';jI.NE.' .,' .~\}..,,,-,:-, - -~L~"GE ~N ; ,CO _ ..' . ...-' I I , . , I I ~ MciNRÒ_~-~~ '..... 1_- _ _ _" .".__. -" . Salem Bank and Trust ' S:í ' Clp.,'{ .-' ---- E..., , , , .." 1_' i\ " '1 i " i , , .~þ,IN £1', () -.' - ,,' '''. .- .:t ~'.-" ,('11 I \'~ U~S:",_:..c..-- I I \N Cþ,\~<?·--- J: I ' ,.-' ,-' " " Co( ; E.\.\.' ~ i \"J p,IJR'i'J, /, I"',G \~, ~~~~~R.-l.~·\t >-1 I ',;' ,!ó ~ !JJ, :'( ',0 ",~ ".('11 j. f'~S~~_., '.? 'Y' ' '0 « ¡\N. "n·. . -..., , 'Y- - ~ 'Z , ({ ,}>: r: .~,.,~ ..,--' "î" '-'\:~ \, Q\.~ ",.G ...."", ,\-\",.,~\.\r...~ '~"::,-,~' \.i I , j\ \ ç :.¡1í.. ,í ,,~LL~~ \.j 'fT1'.:C1'1 '. (J) '. . -;..¡. _ \.~ . !fJ ',-< ',~', \11'1 " :.!fJ '" '?. ',W -''-.. ,Cf)' ,c... .~ " '-t ". ',..-\, \ _.' '. -. : \ (P. , ,.' , '. . , ,~, ' '. ' , \.H ' W""O "'n' -' '. , '. "p.;...'{ ,.-' .r, u.' ,..., - " -' , -:, .F?T,:U~.,W ',-.-'. ".' '-, _ , . ¡l:'OURTHS1 ,'- _':_ _'-' --', -'·--.::'.~c:-.-;· '---.. 1'1$ f'o,\-'{ '. 5IMI-h~- -,,- o _ \ R$1'SI "E. ¡;, ,..--'. ...~ ". C'~ '. ~ A ~ ~1;-'O It'- "k.. . -.. ¡".!\ "'Jz . '" ~I\I.' 'I"f"tt-:. ~ \J\RG~N\-",.~~E..., .. '"I '. o B ';,50 ._ (f)'h' .4 /-, (1)1 -« , OIJN ~1, . . ,-S1 <:C.II.·..l.,._.'r'\.., _..-'" ".,-'" ': IJo"IEL" I;- ,., E. e.<'~~·. .' . " I , 1_', I l I' . . , 1 ';,:2\NÄl!'lI)}:~- ", _n'- -.' 'm-' --" K\~\E~N 111. . n '-' :," '1~Yl.^ND ¡\_Y.~.'~--,· -' .-- ': t"\ .;--.. I I., "'p~Gq~'9-'~~'-- --.... i?Q , ~ItO " . :t'~ ~ .',', . S<v. 0 ": ....'BO sT,. ",(!---' C ¿Y ,1~.,' ",!fJ .r- ',- . ,.:) " ,.0 ...~... "" l" . ' ',Or:"'" IJc",..... 51 . - , ',,(f)', ·,.r " "'0 <'. '._<-' . .-' , ',(f') \ "0' "\'1'1 ,E.r..., . '. \* "'\9-"':i>: .....~,'. -' \' "';.~,~':"" \ ~ \ ~ .., ~"'" . "1" .... '.; "~ \\1'1 \-1.', flf"l'r\5,,-.· :,~ \,. ',0, ". "-.i--\; ".... -., \ ....~...-.. . 1m '."" sr~1\-\.~i- .....g}.... '\,(fI,<& """'" '\...,~_..,..".. _ ;.5- _ \,'!l.o \" '.', ." r- ,-;0 . ''''', ·'S"'\. i,~_""""'.,~\ \0', .~.... . . v......,'· , z, ''P' ,0· '. " "P 51!' ,.~,' . -.--' , " ~ \ ", ",):J " -~" ',_ ,_.',.r;- ....' . '..... \';!;!, "', .':.'1 'r,'JI''''Q -- \, ,- I" , ',r- '-'-'r: "z i, \. \=- ',(f')' " . .' - \~- ... ~ '" ~ '. 1l' ". \,Y- '. " ¡1'\ '.~" :4 -< . , ':'(, r: '. -..' . ;.(. . ..... '. ". ~ SS\JE.~, í~, ~, '-":,~" '. \, ". Y- ". I .... -- r-, '51 .'-- \~£iG'rI1f1.- .'. _¿.. -. . ," - 'I I, ... --' -.," \~ .'.....- S þ,'JE ... ~ \I-\.\NO\__-~--n'" ° -,.' - ,_._,-- \~ v-eE.ír\ þ,\J,§_, "'. -~~~ .-- .-.--' \ I-. " 0' ': ,t-. C;), Q: '" .' KE.RÑE.~ !"':!§,\ .... SS'\ , o!.,Y:."µ-; .. ~ I h ~ ~Q'~ 01- ~ (;\ :;. ~ "YA·-Vt, ~,<", ~ , "1<:y - .-z, . <'~ '9't, -\.l- 'J- ~ , - ';Õ-- .~ \1l' '(fI "~ %-& \5'0 Ü-? "oS'..... ,:/ ~-\ v~ . 0.... "1((0<if. '.>'/0 f)_ "1¿..~ ." .,-.' Salem Located Properties lJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 200 400 800 Feet I I I I I I I I I Salem Bank and Trust Building I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 220 East Main Street, Salem Year of Original Construction: 1977 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 35,550 Acreage of Site: 0.323 Tax Map Number: 106-13-6 Zoning-: DBD Current Use: Social Services Dept., rental space I I I I I I I I I ¡aa,¡ om:¡ ()()~ OOl 0 900~ '¡sn6n'q' B ¡U8WdOI8^80 fi.¡!Unwwo:::> )0 ¡uawµeda(l sarµadoJd pa¡e:::>0l wales ~¿.. -(~ 0", ~C) )>. ¡,yo f)~V ~ C:>~ ''y , i ': .--'--i-: 1 . 'is ,-,Ú'-IÐ~3~\, ;', \\ " ",, "', 4:"5",-', H1t;¡3~3S ~\" ~..." t,",., ':, _"< ,- _~, . r-', ~'.: - '., 'i.... 1.5 , , ~I ..I'. ..('_.W,·-' , <J)" ~, '. , ' O'·.--'i.',.-· 2-', ..I'. 'Ø.... ", ~" 4'.\ \.', .__.__.-~'" .-' - \ ", ~', -2.' ..{' ',« , " "', l._"S-tÙ)(\~ ~ ' "'" Ç;;_\, \ O· '. 3;'1', _':.-r-(f)." ".. &-', -."" '0 a:-. ... ..-,' " \).1\ . '. "J: I"~, ....._. ___'. - 0,'.,,'-' ~- W'; ';" \ " If) __ . 0', ''tj¡" ... . - . '''\5 u. ' ". '/:', ":, ~ '. ¡j) I¡¡¡\-' .L5\-11"" ~ L 4. " " -z.', .... 6\. ',r- '. " ~ .... " :', -\ J '-- t3 ", 0 ' '. (1·. .nn__n___.Q.j____ '---is\-l1,;;,:J, r"'" w", "S', ~", ',\î¡\ ~ "*', ..I'. 0' ',-s-,:,... s;.n.~ " .w.'",- ~ \: -g",,~-, \~'\ ~s " . ,- 'üJ' 0-" ~-, ',,^;;;BN~3;; l' ji~ "'~"(r ~:, %\ ' ""_ : '" \.,_---,-,.:,:,;-u'-·3"·ñi{Úi.3- "'!:l f)<::' -,-, :f (/)\- - o~\¡.J.1.·· 3,,'1 .......'" '. ,''>j Q-1l ',- « ". is , " t)',. - .--,-' -" ~. &!) ", " ' 0",- ,- .-.- :is\ONn:'1 !:Y0'\t ' . \ ~... 3('\ ,'.. I>-Q "" _ .'"-,,-,"'~,:,o~35,, é',-·-- ~ .,~ .LSo,~" " __~,,- .._.- --·--'v.~¡"\t-â~;'h~~I1'" ~-1b-' , ...-\'3~1)\_ _1).1.('--,--' ~~b:: ,... , - . - . - ~. -z. . . . '1 ì: "",,·,1.SIf\NWI¥''6. """" ".", ~ 1oS'4; .1¡,.- 0>. :-tt~ ::>'! t;¡' ~, " Ÿ0 ' 'ft.\. :1 , 6"3 ....1 }..O: ~",... . ~ -r~ I 7). '7,s.. A -$> z,. .1-: '7>- ' '7,s..' { ~ ...: "ð ~ 10 ~ 019' ~. ~ -..>- <>5' '& ;-')0 \í'; \S"'%- .Ls",iS~\:i ?'. ~'¡šti>~~~S_ . _ . _ . x, -ii~ xiÐ\~ H~~'¡~d~~"1,j~j" , I. (J) I, " 'r I; 'I t-(f)', -..-,.\lJ,',. ?: " '. ~'",-- ; , --~,~:;,-- '\,:.~\,-~'\~:"':,-, . õ " ,:31"\~ ',")-- ! 7, ,U" ,~, r- ct: ; -' W' ',' ,,-, ' Uî\ ø:I;...-,.- -fñ"" '\:1.\ '\ , , .... -""a', ' '(j¡ '" tí)\ 4. ". ... "- ,--'- .-: , ;.. o ... ~\, -z.\ ....- "'-1' Š 'lS):J\~ N\ r . lU". ~ ". 0\ : f;; 1;::.\ '. 0;...':::; " -< :r: ' ""'L ' "", . ~~>'--l'il'B3';¡1~~ ù\ ?.... I ". I, "-" '.-' ..... N\~\\'d ... . .lS "'\13 , ~'. 1_,-; ,;i\;,.;s-~;~O~-\'<I'J r-J- ")-- ,'" , . -. -- -So 3 ,It, ~ ' -,- ---"S' ~r.O\-\Î"¡ , ~\ .~,-" ...." -' -ð'1.5N\.,¡~M . ) \ 'ì .. - 3i\'.t..jlt,Ú0'd1/\ ',þ..- : '" . ;-; J ~ '" - -ct:, " 4.' " D' , u.I 0- -"'93 '"'\13N'-'c\1'\ . ~S ' - ... . .--' 'I ~S'~~~63 ,..--. '. . .. ¡SrlJ1 pu~ )lues wales ~ '. . ..' ... \---3~3'-\O':)\ L'-' '. tfl _', __"" _ -~t#1\\o. .. ,}..1.,¡S.J- '" ... , .~ I, .'_ _ ._,' --'~~~di~S ¡...-\;,¡ ", " u,}, ~. '<ñ '; a:. , ·0 ct', ..I 3" ~ ¡p'. r·, , ' .. " .. -' ! '-" . J \.nf xaldwoJ I!er pue 'sa:>!AJas :µnoJ 'asnoljJ.moJ , ,,...¡ 1 'I - -- - - - -- -: -is' 3ÕB~\?VII:' :: £ 'lJ 'G/) :0 15 ON.. \ilå ' ;;: ;~ .'m .~--- - :0 ':<) 'j; :r- g \, 'm ;'~ :~ ':þ ~< '01 :"l - _u 0 'z -------'~----_. '111 ~ j <- ~ t- -<- ", .,µ', '-'-:, ~' . -z..., 0\ "Z-,. ~. 7 \':. ~, y; '. If! ~" 't ~.' 9L - --. .() .¡¡ ·is ,'l. ': 'f7f :; ,I 'ê) ':1: ,'m ;- ~... -z.. r\ .J\ W'· 0, ~. ~" tL... .... '. ;,,(, " .e' " z.'" ' "d1. . c:¿, 0,.. ~. -t- .. - - 3^V NÕ~(HMVH -r ,3N;f ClNVl3^=!':J :: I ! .' -N\~' Ò~ ~~0\-\1. # '>i)') \oS . Public Service Center I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 1206 Kessler Mill Rd. Year of Original Construction: 1950 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1984 Square Footage of Current Building: 70,000 Acreage of Site: 13.31 Tax Map Number: 036.03-01-01.00-0000 Zonin~: 12 Current Use: General Services Adm., Parks & Recreation Adm. Wash Bay ., " ., ;=1 I ~, - ---- --- - ---.. ... ~?' - ~ .., .. .., I~· ~,,\; . . ~( -.,'.0;.;". ~ '.'-~ ~ -.' [L'~ ".~- ~....-_. . ~... :':-.: .. . , .... .-. . , '_ ~..ri":: ~ .-. .........:¿...-... ..~~. . .. .........~\,..... _ _,~_o<~_~~: BUILDING PROFILE Address: 1206 Kessler Mill Rd. Year of Original Construction: 1996 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 1,512 Acreage of Site: 13.31 Tax Map Number: 036.03·01-01.00-0000 Zonin~: 12 Current Use: Car Wash for County Vehicles -?" -, LJepartment of Community Development Kessler Mill Complex 8 August, 2005 o 5() 100 200 Feet I I I I J I I I I D Roanoke County Properties THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKER & 522 f>£ FIELDS CAUDLE & BETTY :0 O.71/V:; ï . ROSELAWN FOREST INC 021 Ac '" THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKE-< & 1.94Ac THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKER & 32.22 Ac LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 45 9ü 180 Feel I Þ I I I I I I I . , . ~OWERlBURN BUILDING I \ : \ '. ~. \ '" " , " \ EMS TRAINING BUILDING I \ "c. 036.03-01-01.02-000 1310 KESSLER MIL 0 , 6.07 Ac '. ~ ~\ ,. ." ~ \ ,. .' r- . , '.; "".\ .... . '\ -'. \ '\ \ 036.0]', Dl-6~,OO-qooo o KESS",:ERfJILL RD 31;6 À2" \' \ . ~ /' \ \ \ \ \ 036.03-01 ~01.00-0000 1206 KESSLER MILL RD 13,31Ac , \ " ' \ "'. ~ ,. \.. "~'. Kessler Mill Complex HINCHEE RAYMOND DYER TR OF MA 36.9 Ac PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER " ".¡. I'· .\ " \ . "< ' \\ " " " , . . \ -;1.. " \., \\ 036,p3-Þ'.}~'(J1.0\;0. 000, o KËf?SL B,MIL~ ~D \ \0.0 ,Pop " . , .... , \ "".... \ .... \, ."\.......\:.- ., i.." '" .... _'ò.... \ 'J.'- \- . "\ 'õ ~. ", ^' . ,., '\. ."A , ;/ 'ò.... \ " \ D Roanoke County Properties Roanoke Valley Regional Fire and EMS Training Center BUILDING PROFILE Address: 1320 Kessler Mill Rd. Year of Original Construction: 2000 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 15,677 Acreage of Site: 6.07 Tax Map Number: 036.03-01-01.02-0000 Zoning: 12 Current Use: Fire and EMS Education and Training Tower/Burn Building I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 1310 Kessler Mill Rd. Year of Original Construction: 1988 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 2,428 Acreage of Site: 6.07 Tax Map Number: 036.03-01-01.02-0000 Zoning: 12 Current Use: Fire Training ....o\~partment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Kessler Mill Complex o 50 100 200 Feel I I I I I I I I I D Roanoke County Properties THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKER Ii 522 At; .. FIELDS CAUDLE & BETTY .<:J 071 At; .~" ROSELAWN FOREST INC 0.21 At; . THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKE:.t & 1.94Ac '; - THORNHILL SUZANNE PARKER Ii 32.22 Ac ....Æpartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 45 90 180 Feel 1 I I I I I I I ~ TOWER/BURN BUILDING: I 036,03-01-01,02-000 131û KESSLER Mil 0 ", 6,07 Ac ',. ~. \ \. ~.." " \. \ EMS TRAINING BUILDING \: , ' '. , \ " ,. \". , , .. HINCHEE RAYMOND DVER TR OF MA 36.9Ac PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER \.~.. \ '\ ,<\ 036.03\01-6';':00-0000 o KESS:.ERfo1ILLRD 3';;:6 Ac~, \- \'.\ "if: \.~ \ .~ "''? .~ ......, .-/ \ 036,03-01c01.00..QÒOO 1206 KESSLER MILL RO 13,31Ac , , \ ,,' Kessler Mill Complex \" \ " , ,,' ". "J, " \ . " \ \ \'. ", \ \ '. \ \ \ \1..- ",::,,; \ ., ....-:-. I, ~3~~~\~1dlt~~og\ . '.0.0 . , ~\.. \ "\ ~ \~ ".\,\ -.-,.,:.- ,.\~ . \. \}., \.,\ 'ò' / 'ò' ~. '. ., ,. . D Roanoke County Properties HQ/419 Library BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3131 Electric Road Year of Original Construction: 1972 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1988 Square Footage of Current Building: 21,012 Acreage of Site: 2.52 Tax Map Number: 076.16'02-08.00·0000 Zonin~: C1 Current Use: Library Administration, South County Library '-'fi ùepartment of Community Development HQ/419 Library 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 Feel Ii I I.. I I D Roanoke County Properties i ~-,Ù CERTIFIED MEDICAl REPRESENTATI 3.775 Ac H.~ÇTR.I~¡:¡D 076.1&-02-07,00-0000 o LEDGEWOOD AV 0.939 Ae SNAPP MARY F aAc ( ~_ CU HOKE STEVEN 1=1 & OAc BODY RUTH G TR UIRUTH G eODY OAc CROTTS TODD P & KATHERINE D ·OAe PHELPS HUGH e & AUDREY H OAe O"\1:~O. ~~.\~. - ....~.:{,.::, I ", -"I ) RHODES'ALAN L & FRANCES H OAc. ùepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 Fee! I. I . I. I I I FIRST NATIONAl EXCHANGE BANK 1.34Ac MURRAY PANSIE L OAe <. . WILHELM WILLARD B \ aAc \ SWIM AMV M 0,,0,1' \ 076.16-02-08.00-0000 3131 ELECTRIC RD OAe - j ,.:.. i. ..' -'.: BRITTQfII MICHAHA&LlSAM· CAc ' HQ/419 Library CAVE SPRING OFFICE PARK PROP 0 O.89Ae - ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 2,05 Ac .. , . -' ~.:::~ c "/? í'CI?D ."--c.. ~. ':- ~.~ '.~ ~ % ,56 \'i¡;=v¿ '-'\J.-;-,.:{\"o \ -.:"c. MCMAHON M~CHA£l ù & REBECCA 1-1 \ ~ OAc '. ~, \ \ \ 'f"_ \ \,WEBB WILLIAM D & BONNIE M GRE OAc ' ,- I . . I Ct:DAR POINT ASSOCiATES II L P 11.27 AI; , -'" \ \ " .,' ..' n n:n. ¿ \, -, ~ oCQ q <;: .¡ .:., ,~ ~.p- ) .~ ''f>. '11 .~ \ , \. D Roanoke County Properties Bent Mountain Branch Library I w BUILDING PROFILE Address: 10148 Tinsley Lane Year of Original Construction: 1987 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 2005 Square Footage of Current Building: 650 Acreage of Site: 5.33 acres (school parcel - library shares a wall with B.M. school) Tax Map Number: 111.00-01-08.00-0000 Zoning: AV Current Use: !:õo'" .~ .. - .:.. "0 -* -'"Q' ~ ,~.. '\ .."" WALDRON I H & SETTY K 292M " , ",: . "7.1 ~ '\.. .. ... COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE . t ., 5.33 Ac ~~ . , .. '... \ , BROWN ROBERT L & HAZEL4 9Ac . . , \ , 'j ~ '-- ... LJepartment of Community Development Bent Mountain Library 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 Feel I. I I I. I I I .... ~ , I't. , , r· r -.. "'. ' D Roanoke County Properties DEAN BARNEY E & DONNA F 335 Ac . MITCHElL THOMAS B 0.85 Ac BROWN ROBERT L & HAZEL T 9Ac uepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 Feel I I ~ I I . I I I LAWRENCE MEMORIAL METHODIST CH 2.07 Ac .....¡. ....~, ....9, '.1- "',~ COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 5.33 Ac 111.00-01-08.00-0000 10148 TINSLEY LN 5,33 Ac " TERRY GRACE MINOR 116Ac . Bent Mountain Library WALDRON I H & BETTY K 2 92 A<; COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 3.82 Ac ", ,._-9 STONE GEORGE A & RUBY E 107 Ac D Roanoke County Properties Glenvar Branch Library I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3917 Daugherty Road Year of Original Construction: 1978 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 5,114 Acreage of Site: 3.93 Tax Map Number: 055.13-01-02.02-0000 Zoning: C1 Current Use: Library · - .. .. ,- ..(. .;. 8 August, 2005 o.Jepartment of Community Development Glenvar Library o 15 30 60 Feel I. I I I. I .1 D Roanoke County Propertìes .,,:' . \, \ \ RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 575 "" RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OAc " ,I. (I ,. RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 8.77 Ac 0. " 1>: C 'Q .,*, ' '. -p. .1 \~ ''-:0\\ ", \.,\ . COMMONWEALTH OF VA OAc ',. R l R INVESTMENTS l l C ~,12.o.:: ." 055.13-01-02.02-0000 3917 DAUGHERTY RD 3.93 Ac MINI WORLD CHILD CAR~ CENTER I \ .i 5ð,Ac. l .i-· .. . . ,. '.. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE 11 Ac ' . Ò55.13-01-02.00-0000 3915 WEST MAIN ST 3.52 Ac CROUSE R061;RT 6 TR OF THE 0.87 Ac .\; :¡ AARON J CONNER MAc. /<&~ /r-\~ ' .,~~ ,-. ROANOKE EQUIPMENT CO 325 Ac BI':"LBOARD JRE RQANOKE LlC 4.45 Ac ..;epartment of Community Development Glenvar Library 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 Feel I I I II I I I I D Roanoke County Properties Hollins Branch Library I '~"<:::: ~ BUILDING PROFILE Address: 6624 Peters Creek Rd. Year of Original Construction: 1971 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1981, 1992 Square Footage of Current Building: 17,671 Acreage of Site: 1.96 Tax Map Number: 027.14-01-03.00-0000 Zoning: C2 Current Use: Library ....epartment of Community Development Hollins Library 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Propertíes GLAD TIDINGS ASSEMBLY OF GOD C 3.5Ac ". -.:.0 . r'J C' ,/ . I!), -.( .. C.; " ','i . .',¡ " ¡, . / ,. ,< f . . '- - " LEWIS-GIBBS CORPORATION 9A5 Ac ' ". ..~~ '._--J. ~ " "<-y:, TR OF GLAD TIDINGS ASSEMBLY OF. 3.51 Iv:; , , ." ,,- " ..... ;. (, " -·v_, 027.14-01-03.00-0000 6624 PETERS CREEK RD . 1.96Ac '" STRITESKY EDWARD W & DELORES STRITESKY. EDWARD W & JEAN M " 0.45 Ac ' 037 At:. / ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 10 186 Ac .. II .' ). ''': HITE BEVERLY M 0.91 Iv:; ..;epartment of Community Development Hollins Library 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I 100 Feet I I .,". " ~ '¡. s ,(.,.--~."" , ~Q~~2 , - ~.f:"t¿'f. -- ~sG - \'(\~ ". ./ '. , ) .: _. -"/ ., '.:> CI 0. % ,~ \ '-'- \ -z,. \\C¿ \~ 'þ \«\ '. 0.. \ HITEBIEVERLY M \ 1.31 AI; / / \ JOHN M OAKEY INC 3,645 Ac '< ':y..:~- 'i:.t¿v...~? ' ~sc~ \,t¿'\'i:. . ' MECHANICAL DEV CO INC 5.14 Iv:; , \\ MICHAEL JAMES W SR (¡FE ESTAT 1.32 Ac . D Roanoke County Properties Mt. Pleasant Branch Library I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3218 Mt. Pleasant Blvd. Year of Original Construction: 1950 (school - library inside school opened in 1985) Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): refurbished in 2001 Square Footage of Current Building: 529 Acreage of Site: 6.5 (school parcel) Tax Map Number: 079.02-01-68.00·0000 Zoning: AV Current Use: Library MOUNT,Pl'ËASAIIIT eAP1~5T C~Q:'~S .... _ . Ð !Ie '-'t" - '. '....._ ..:r ~~-. ¡·k-.. -... I;:) - ...~ O¡. }. """ .. I ;II fI:;.J .... ~~ .' "Io',.~ : . 'RI...tAI1D~ON CATHERINE'NEIGHBOR 239At: .. ....=*--- . , . ! ./ I I I '~I" " MT PLEASANT MET~ot~H~"""," · . ' · }' "1',{. .. : , .~ ~ ~ 4 ,-;" ¡ " ~ l'. " ii',"tI/M '¡ \~E:i1TER"> " ~~-;..:/t .. . 1.75 A<: '" ! i - . ~; . .' . f · . ! : "I i .". . '. ~... . ~.. ".! " ; ". f'~-"~-~'! 'it ') ~._--_.~-,.' --:-;'- .. '.(:(..itj. :,' ~(. -.~ .<'- '." .". \ -:'. '", "'\ " \ ~~ \_~-t, . i .. . .... \... ~~?~J ~. \' . ~-~'.~¡- ' \ "'" Cll9.,02-01-68.00.0000, '\ "..;'4 o~, V: ~...._ '~ ~ 3216 MOUN6T PLEASANT B1. \.:....&O~.lINTV~~H9,.?~~~~,0f,'ROANOIiE_ ~ _ .5 Ac' ~.....- .....,.-.~. ... -" , +-::.-: 5' - -'\'t ~ . ... I 11:. . ~\..-\.-~': ~. ~'\ .1+_ ~.: :- ~ ' . :/'~. ,"""'"' .J ~ ..RI. - n" . ' t:' A ,-' .'W~ .i( \ "'(.~ ~ . .J! \ BA'iftÄM '<YALT~ B.JR&JENNY R .... a k;: -"" .. ~.)~ H¿~~. CHARL~S l..~ VICKIE L . - Óé8 A-:- lJepartment of Community Development B August, 2005 Mount Pleasant Library o 15 30 60 Feet I I I I I. I t I D Roanoke County Properties MOUNT PLEASANT BAPTIST CrQ:'~S OAe :l/ ""uu & o -.J SAUNDERS VIRGINIA G 0.46Ae _PI.T?E~ RD WOOD HENRY C JR & DOLLY 0 0.98 Ae £t'. Q' ;:...; R§'~ÄRDSON CATHERINE NEIGHBOR <i 2J.9Ae Q:'i Ii MT PLEASANT METHODIST CHURCH T OAe CEMETERY 1.75Ae " ,; 079.02-01-68.00-0000 3216 MOUNT PLEASANT BL 6.5Ac COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 6.5Ae ~\.\.~ ~\~ . '. . ; '. ., BASHAM WALT~ B JR & JENNY R \ . CÀ: , ..~ i'" I ,/ ... " ., ., ALDERSON THOMAS & MIC~~'.LLE OAe .., " NOVIA WILLIAM 0 & 0.29 Ae '·ro ',ç. \~ ',~ ".0 \Z .1}') \.:...0. \. . -?:.~ . O¿..,. "'V' ~, 1, .<;. ~, ~. .<t~ 079.02-01-67.00-0000 3071 PITZER RD 9.13 Ac . ALDERSON THOMA!¡ & MICHELLE OAe NOBLE JAMES W & LOREnA M OAe '. HEATH CHARLES W JR & VICKIE L - 0913 Ae COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 0.23 Ae \..... " NOVIA WilliAM 0 & OAe HA'.I ROBERT 0 & MARIE M , 0.25Ae COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 9.18Ac HAM ROBERT 0 & MARIE M OAe IJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Mount Pleasant Library o 15 30 6(] Faat I I I I I I I I I D Roanoke County Properties Vinton Branch Library I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 800 Washington Avenue Year of Original Construction: 1969 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1984 Square Footage of Current Building: 9,292 Acreage of Site: 1.27 Tax Map Number: 060.16-06-32.00-0000 Zoning: RB Current Use: Library uepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Vinton Library o 25 50 100 Feel I I I I I I I I I D Roanoke County Properties T JS LLC OAe HAWKS CECIL DUANE & OAe e;," ,:So. _\-.1 'y ~'è<!'--:" Oo-\~" <Q/ ,'''' «" BOOTH SARAH M 0.18Ae DREW TIMOTHY S & KIMBERLY N 0.21 Ae 1;-0 .' :-¡..~ O~ FOUTZ WILEY E & CAROLYN J. "1,,?:- OAe CALLAHAN THOMAS W & ZELMA T OAe BARBER ROGER MATTHEW & OAe AGEE GREGORY LOUIS & OAe DONAHUE CARMEN R OAe STAR VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC OAe '..., . ·1WEEDY BRENDA P & EDGAR T OAe PARK JACKSON M WADE &' DONNA L OAe GREENWAY CONSTRUCTION INC OAe ECHOLS JUANITA G OAe ClARK EDWARDWJR O~'Õ " WICKERSTY JOSEPH P OAe ECHOLS JUANITAG OAe WHEELING DENNIS D OAe HIXSON JUDITH G OAe '- ') ,"~J ,.~ ,,: -,-, ..... .; '.' .:;J ..... ,) COPENHAVER DOROTHY B OAe BUSHNELL GARY E & SHERRIE H OAe c} ð ~ ~ TOWN OF VINTON 1127 Ac COPENHAVER DOROTHY B OAe :¿, ; ARTHUR LARRY D OAe HOUFF JAMES R OAe ~ ,-' . . MAIJISON AVENUE PROPERTIES LLC OAe OPS LLC OAe ROMIQKE COONTY BOARD OF SUPERV 1.27Ae ' OPS LLC OAe ,,\" 060.16-06-32.00-0000 800 WASHINGTON AV 1.27 Ac :.J. ',' PARK -~ -. ~ . ..r4SH1NGro ··~A\I~ PLAY GROUND I- .t? '!JJ .' ~' if. '<;;;'\.~ BI.-U~.~\~ . TOWN OF V~NTON om .o>.c THRASHER MEM UNITED METHODIST OAe ., THRASHER MEM UNITED'METI-tODIST OAe ~ .IR OF THRASHER MEM UNITED METH . OAe ' 1HRASHËR MEMORIAL: UNITED THRASHER MEM UNITED METHOQIST OAe' OAe' THRASHER MEM UNITED METHODIST OAe ./, I ¡ I THRASHER MEM UNITED METHODIST 0.22 Ac I FULLER D CLYDE & MARIE 0.25 Ae DIVERSIFIED INTERESTS L L L C 1.288Ae '.' THRAsHER MEM UNITED METHODIST , OAe MORGAN JOSEPH A & HELEN W MOR HALDREN STEVEN D & ANGELA C .... OAe OAe STCLAIR THOMAS W & DOROTHY W' OAe ,y LJepartment of Community Development Vinton Library 8 August, 2005 25 50 I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties Blue Ridge Library I ".t· ~~ BUILDING PROFILE Address: 28 Avery Row; Botetourt County, 24090 Year of Original Construction: 1987 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 8,000 Acreage of Site: 2.172 Tax Map Number: 112-4C Zoning: Current Use: Library (co·owned with Botetourt County) Public Safety Center I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3568 Peters Creek Road Year of Original Construction: 1933 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1991 Square Footage of Current Building: 38,041 Acreage of Site: 3.72 Tax Map Number: 037.10-01-21.02-0000 Zoning: C1 Current Use: Police Adm., Fire and Rescue Adm., Dispatch Center, IT Department uepartment of Community Development Pu blic Safety - Peter's Creek Site 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I I I I 100 F~~I I I D Roanoke County Propertìes ", '..Y FIRST WESLEYAN METHODIST CH TR OAc COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 4.442 Ac . VIRGINIA PUBLIC BUILDING AUTHO 2281 Ac ,', '. '~>:1-Q <\~~ < . ',y, u~,-<iS/Q . .j~L <' 'oY,', ~;;:.Q1- . . '-'~ lS'a ,'\,1-Q . \' q. "t~ -9ð 0,. , "- . . y "- ...~... ' . \, LAYMAN MARIE W TR OF THE GLEN 3.21 Ac . -" FIRST WESLEYAN METHODIST CH TR 7.1BAc ".,f. -c'<,,- ..\~,,~..- " '¿' "', "-<"':\ 'I:! . i; , '.'\ . 'y"" .'" ", . J " . ' 037.10-01-21.02-0000 " 3568 PETERS CREEK RD 3.723 Ac . . "-"}, / "~I " '..) . " r--' '. / / " .'.- <{-Q :v*" «-'<:- . (.ì , 9:-i? l~ q t., :..) "'. MELROSE BAPTIST CHURCH TRS 19.1 Ac / . /?' " ':". .(: .,,..¿'{' " ,. <:(-Q (y*". ... '9;-'<:- . . l. / C, (.ì ~ . ...«.: , (¿' « .....j ,,^>' f .' / ]. v LJepartment of Community Development Public Safety - Peter's Creek Site 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I 100 Fe"t I I D Roanoke County Properties Vinton Fire Station (owned by Town of Vinton) ~ 1 I ~- --,," ~ --- . , , , '1 'i ¡ I "I ~ ~ ----- -------. ~" " '.. .--' 1" ~ -'f'-' · ~~'~:.-:.; .... ' - ' ~" " I '" I' ·i~'~ I t"" ~- ~I i1 : I 11 I I I II tl ~ -,,, :: I, ,_ I:.L '''~ ~'~'I"-- .: .. ...-.: .. J .-- " - - 1 ~~.._,., - ' ' " , .,.....-. :..... ~--- - ----'---- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 120 West Jackson Avenue Year of Original Construction: 1976 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 14,912 Acreage of Site: 1 LT Tax Map Number: 060.15·07·24.00-0000 Zoning: CB Current Use: Fire Company # 2 :'1" ~ , f '1 Vinton Fire Station Uepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o I 25 50 I '00 Feel I D Roanoke County Properties WINTER PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP 0.78 Ae HOME SOURCE LLC 0.48 Ae ADKINS JOSEF STEVEN TRUSSLER LEE EDWARD & MYRNA L OAc OAc KNOX CLIFTON 611 JOHNSON MILTON E OAc OAc RADFORD IlOR S TOWN OF VINTŒi OAc 0.31"1'10 VINTON IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION 'OAe o' TOWI'! OF VINTON 0.16Ac c' WL~~'¿¡II~ TOWN OF VINTON . 0.34 Ae Co TOWN OF VINTON OAc HENDRICKS WlllARDEEN H & OAe TOWN OF VHfiOO OAc MCCLUNG DAVID S II & MARGARET OAe STONE RICHARD FRANK & JANINE OAe ~. ¡';~f~ i-t.·'.'·r~.._ DUNMAN B WAYNE & RE8ECCA G 0.93 Ae . STOI\tE RICHARD FRÞ.'NK & JANINE MATTOX LARRY S & CAROL G . . . 0 Ac 0 Ae ,MAZEIKA EOWA:RO J I!. SANDIFER WALTER R & LlNDAK OJJ2Ac OAe OHM ENTERPRISES LLC OAe MAZEIKA EDWARD J & THERESA K , OAc DORAN sA~ & JANET / OAc .'-'J DUNMAN FLORAL SUPPLY INe 0.34 Ac / MT TRUST BANK OF ROANOKE I OAe . ..' ~TOWN OF VINTON OAe ; " . ./. DUNMAN B WAYNE & REBECCA G 0.88 Ae ., 060.15-07-24.00-0000 120 JACKSON AV OAe '0 . '., " TOWN OF VINTON OAe SWISHER FRED L OAc "'.-,. TOWN OF VINTON OAe TOWN OF VINTON OAe TOIMJ OF VINTON OAe . VII JAC . 0 _ 'k:SO'/y - _ . -;-0 ",liE" TOWN OF VINTON OAe 1-' CI), "0 ". Q:" . '.:r " 0' 0: .' G(), ~<v .~"i' è ~~ TOWN OF VINTON 0.09 Ac TOWN OF VINTON OAe ;: "j:2;' "1':- , TOWN OF VINTON REED STREET BAPTIST CHURCH TRS ¡j 24 k \ OAe . ,. TOWN OF VINTON OAc . LEWIS INsÚrUTE.INC THE "-'. É'~c .: . -. J..¡C.... ADAMS GERALD W & VIi;lGIN'},.,S'Dtv STAR OF BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CH V 0 Ae ' OAc "'"1 ADAMS GERALD W & VIRGINIA G 0,23 Ac WEST GENE L OAc TOWN OF VINTON OAe LINARES ANGEL K.\ ELVIA ltNAR TOWN OF VINTON 0 Ae ¿;, o Ae SYNERGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Ll OAe "., ~.( ", ., f'-.', WEST GENE L R~ED STREET ~^;;¡/~T CHURCH TRS OAc ' I I- (J) 1-. ~ I wEST GENE l]J , Q,OßIIAG TOWN OF VINTON OAc TOWN OF VINTON OAc ) (', J (.) WEST GENE L 0,19Ac WEST GENE L 0.41\e " TAl WADE INC 0.45Ae TOWN OF VINTON OAe GUTHRIE PERCY E & SUSIE P TAl WADE IHC o Ac 0.45 Ac WEST GENE L ' 0.1 Ae 'MLKINSON PATRICK C & SUSAN H 013Ac . TAZ WADE INC 0,34 Ac TAZ WADE INC 079 Ae Vinton Fire Station cJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o lS 30 60 Feel II I I II I I I D Roanoke County Properties Vinton First Aid Station (owned by Town of Vinton) "- . - ,.-~- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 110 West Jackson Avenue Year of Original Construction: 1960 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 9,850 Acreage of Site: 1 LT Tax Map Number: 060.15-07-38.00-0000 Zoning: CB Current Use: Vinton First Aid Crew TAl WA.DE INC 0:45 Ñ. ," ........... '. . .... W CLEVELÄNDAVE .. , .. .. ,J 1 1€~<i:'M'~74'N 01t,11J'E 8 August, 2005 uepartment of Community Development Vinton First Aid Station o 2S so I I 1 00 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties STONE RICHARD FRANK &.JANINE OAe MAZEIKA EDWARD J &. PAGANS LUTHER C &. LOIS N 0.02 Ae OAe PULLER WILLIAM E &. PATRICIA F OAe C -< l _ ..J _ , -_ SANDIFER WALTER R &. LINDAK DORAN SAM &.JANET OAe OAe MATIOX LARRY S &. CAROL G MAZEIKA EDWARD J &. THERESA K Ok Ok GREENWAY TIMOTHY D OAe / WRAY DONALD LEE JR &. RHONDA T OAe / MT TRUST BANK OF ROANOKE OAe -f.--,) Cíb , SA S S PROPERTIES 0.06 Ae "- .j 'td ~~ '?J ,.,'-{ r-fi Ó CI.¡ SA S S PROPERTIES 0.07 Ae r~) CI .) _. L _.' '. .c.- ..~ THOMAS WILLIAME&.ROBINA Milk ( ,I) TOWN OF VINTON OAe SWISHER FRED L OAe NOELL ETHEL W OAe . I' /0..., ~' Q: ~' 5i ,..j.' 0' .:¡. !:?: MEADOR EVERETT E EST OAe ;. " ¡ TOWN OF VINTON OAe .~- SOUTHERN PROPER1Y iNVESTMENTS OA~ TOWN OF VINTON OAe WJ-. -~EkSO -. ~ -4 Vi: JONESS WILLIAM W &. JUDI1} ANN CAe " , ". LEWIS INSTITUTe I'~Ç THE OAe ADAMS GERALD W &. VIRGINIA G OAe STAR OF BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CH V OAe € '. . J.4¡Ck, -'-. So . - - ·-~.<1[;B ADAMS GERALD W &. VIRGINIA G 0.23k '- DUNMAN B WAYNE &. REBECCAG OAe TOWN OF VINTON OAe LINARES ANGEL H &. ELVIA LINAR OAe '0 SYNERGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LL OAe --/...:J u,j DUNMAN B WAYNE &. REBECCA G 0.65 Ae Vinton First Aid Station uepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 10 20 I I I I I 40 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties Cave Spring Fire Station I a u --- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 4212 Old Cave Spring Road Year of Original Construction: 1970 Years of Major Renovation(s)1 Addition(s): 1981 (2 bay addition), 1988 (living area, 4 bay addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 15,575 Acreage of Site: 1.25 Tax Map Number: 077.17-06-02.00·0000 Zoning: C2 Current Use: Fire Company # 3 uepartment of Community Development Cave Spring Fire Station 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I I 100 Feet I I D Roanoke County Properties CEDAR POINT ASSOCIATES II L P , 1U7Ae PLYMALE SHIRLEYW OAe IY..¡ &. ' '!to , ~;.. '?() COX JAMIE D & MARTHAW TRS UI . ~,58Ae', . ~G Ro,. , ":\1- 51'8.\, -- O~p Cp\_.\:: - ,H PORTER DANIEL B 0,74 Ac MARTIN ALBERT AKERS 0.71 Ac EL RODEO ASSOCIÃÍ"ES 0,:14 Ac JOHN M OAKEY INC 6,77 Ac " .I .---- ~,/ EGERTON DORIS I /I. 1.19Ac 8 August, 2005 uepartment of Community Development o 25 50 I I 100 Fe,,¡ I I ; r ~ . ENTERPRISE INVESTMENTS LTD 4,22 Ac , ·'bbi '?:'r-.;. J. -' "". '-:-.'.\ 'ç" ,¡~ <5'j-' c i:"'~_ - C\S :C'),- ù"iÒ . " 077.17-06-02.00-0000 'J 4212 pLD CAVE SPRING RD . ' \ 1.25 Ac ." "- ~'- : . ""..,...{v ,!~"< ~^'O :--..0 / # /' #'/ H . "'.1 . . A ENTERPRISES L P 1,21 Ae \..... ) .-1 / ~<v ~"i" ^,O ;y $ # ROSEWOOD LLC . 0,39 Ac Cave Spring Fire Station NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE 141 Ae / / / SUB APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY 3.29Ac SAUL EDITH M 0:: I OAe 0, ....), I,UI ~~'RAOFORO SILAS W & MARY E ': OAG D Roanoke County Properties Cave Spring Rescue Squad I -... ..~.....:......--" ...- ......_- -.......- ... ..--_. ..._-~-... _.___-:a....._---........---. 'Co_T - _.~. ............-'._- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3206 Valley Forge Avenue Year of Original Construction: 1990-1991 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 9,482 Acreage of Site: 1.00 LT Tax Map Number: 077.13-03-04.00-0000 Zonin~: CIC Current Use: Rescue Squad # 3 F&DLANDCO OAS A<: , ~ .. ~' ~. 'b /' ~# $ ,.. it.' ~ " .' , " " LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Cave Spring Rescue Squad o 15 30 60 Feel I I. I I I I. I D Roanoke County Properties F & 0 LAND CO 045 k- F & 0 LAND CO 0.44 k- BODDIE-NOELL ENTERPRISES INe 0.57 Ac PENNINGTON LARRY K & ELlZABET 0.12Ac CHS IHC 196 Ac B N E RESTAURANT GROUP III LLC PENNINGTON LARRY K & ELlZABET . .093 Ac . 0,56 Ac 3743 BRAMBLETON PROPERTIES O.SAc. .\ .¡.4'<- :'\o~ 9.>,,'<- <Q~ ., :"!;'.I F & D LAND CO O.OB Ai::. Q\ ~\ 01,.-\\ ~'. C'"(" ~. ð F & D LAND CO . 0.66 Ac ,. ~','" , '\"': '\. : . t:" ~'<- :'\o~ ~'<- . 't-~'?) <Q~ \\:, 077,13-03-02.00-0000 . 3738 BRAMBLETONAV 2,06Ae WHITING OIL CO INC OAc ,,".' ~.' WHITING OIL eo INC 0.08 Ac ~ . J ("- '\!17 .13-03'-03 ,OO-OOOÒ\ (;.;BRAMBLETONÀV \ . . \' ". OAe '. 077.13-03-04,00-0000\"- "03206 VALLEY FORGE AV " '. . OÄc n-.,., . ø) "'. '. Di·t.<~,~.~,Ó3-95.0JJk~~)" 077.1 ;3-03-Ö6.00¡OOOO o VALLE:~,·.J'0RGE liìk'l:?6 VALLEY FORGE AV '. o Ac °tro' 0 Ae /; . ", ~ A/vf77 .1.3"()3-07 .qo-oooo 3~30 VALLEY F0RGE AV OAe ,. WHITING OIL co INC 055 Ac, / -. ./ ., '.. , . f) PERDUE RICHARD H 0.14Ac ~ PERDUE RICHARD H O. 19 Ac LOCHNER LEROY G'8o ANN W 03Ac ' . , (",". K80 RENTALSLLC OAc '';. iEMPLETON VEST LTO TEMPLETON VEST L TO TEMPLETON VEST LTD OAc' OAc . OAc ' TEMPLETON VESTLTD O~c~ CAMPER 'LARRY K & LINDA B OAe. - ..I... ( \ .l: lOCHNER LEROY G SOWDER A RAY OAe PERDUE RICHARD HERMAN ,0 Ae o Ac' SOWDER A RAY OAc STOCKER DAVID G TR OF DAVID G 0.13k- . CON~ORDPL ---- STOCKER DAVID G TR OF DAVID G 01SAc TACOMA INC 074 Ac WILSON TROY E & MARTHA SUSAN . . , OAe PLACONA MICHAEL J & PATRICIA OAc PI.ACONA MICHAEL J & PATRICIA KING B J CONTRACTOR INC 'OAc OAe KING BJCONTRACTORINCJOHN$ON LAWRENCEDJR80MARGA OAc \QAc '. JOHNSON LAWRENCE 0 JR & MARGA . '. OAc MANNING MAYNARD 0 0.19Ac RICKMAN RANDYA80 MARY A OAc PLACONA' MICHAEL J & PATRICIA o Ac TINKOFF MAX M & SHEILA F OAc STQÇKER THERESIA C TR OF THE . 0.23 Ac uepartment of Community Development Cave Spring Rescue Squad 8 August, 2005 o 15 30 60 F"et I. I I I. I I I D Roanoke County Properties Catawba Fire Station I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive Year of Original Construction: 1972 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1986 (single bay addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 4,355 Acreage of Site: 4.06 Tax Map Number: 007.00'01-29.00-0000 Zoning: ARS Current Use: Fire Company # 4 uepartment of Community Development Catawba Fire Station 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 100 Feel I I I I I I I I D Roanoke County Properties " L..Jepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 100 Feel I I I I I I I I I " .' 007.00-01-29.00-0000 5585 CATAWBA HOSPITAL DR 4.06 Ac ./ ~ «"Q:- f<.'< 4;-'<J FORREN JAMES D & MARYLIN B 1.25Ac Catawba Fire Station CO~MONWEALTH OF VA 732 03 Ac '" Cc a· .' _0' ~:' s: \%) o :C' c§" S', !! ..' <J MARSHALL ALICE SUE MOORE 1,58Ac D Roanoke County Properties Hollins Fire and Rescue Station I " ,I ~' , .-. _ - _. ... .-.~. t} BUILDING PROFILE I Address: 7401 Barrens Road Year of Original Construction: 1981 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1999 (sleeping area/bunk room addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 12,244 Acreage of Site: 2.51 Tax Map Number: 027.13-04-01.00-0000 Zoning: C2S Current Use: Fire Company # 5, Rescue Squad ~ y ~., .F .-" 'l~ ~- --., ~~ ~ uepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Hollins Fire and Rescue Station o 25 50 I I 100 F8i>1 I I D Roanoke County Properties GLAD TIDINGS ASSEMBLY OF GOD C 3.5Ac CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLlA 6.15Ae --~. ,. LEWIS-GIBBS CORPORATION 9A5 Ae ,." '-::.. \J ,. " ~.. ._/~. .,' CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLlA 0,99 Ac HONAKER EUGENE S II & JOYCE S. . 0.995 Ac " ç, , ~ :'.' ,~:;. .' j " 027.13-04-01.00-0000 7401 BARRENS RD 2.51 Ac ./ ../ MELLOR LETlY OFELIAALONSO~' OAc . /" . ....: .. HYLTON STEVEN W OAc fl' . >1J¡>}?,. .&q~~I\iS' ", . ~0;1!J f?D - lie¡ .' ...... NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH T . OAc /, r) ..::.,V':A f... "', > &'- > HILLIARD JAMES 0 JR & CAROLYN ~~ OAc f,; O<ç- .,~ NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHUF>CH T OAc . . ': . < .:.... . " .. 'NDRTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH T NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH T O~ O~ FERNATT THOMAS R & BRENDA G OAc NQRTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH T OAc , '. A F UNITE!) LLC A F UNIT",!) LLC o Ac 0.56 Ac. " SOUTHERN AIR ¡NC OAc- NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH T! OAe Hollins Fire and Rescue Station L..lepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I I 100 Fsel I I D Roanoke County Properties Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station BUILDING PROFILE Address: 2909 Jae Valley Road Year of Original Construction: 1975 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1990 (single bay addition), 2002 (bunk room addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 9,348 Acreage of Site: 1.08 Tax Map Number: 079.01-03-24.00-0000, 079.01-03-25.00-0000 Zoning: AV Current Use: Fire Company # 6, Rescue Squad WERLE LYNN D & REBEKAH S 0.26 Ac: j' .Mo<.J~."t, " '1_ ~·Ät.., . I!~'" I~ i'r-~' . . '. It.. t , ..., ' ~ ~ ...1 .,i', .' "'-. - .. '!' '~:1i~Y BARKER DALE&KIMBER~y.·4 '.- Jt. ' . 0'41'¡,;z. 'rr"'~ MI~.CH-E~~ ~N~l?j'\~SHIRLEY C", y B' .~.,:." .....~ .¿.. 029.'>'~1 / ,.1;.'.: - _0' ~~ . . ~i . -..i.'. ROBERTS BRIAN.¿'&TRACEY D -.'.,..' ," . "'.c... O;34'ÂC" - ~..., · t.(L¿"G~ER BESSIE A.' " " "., ';{" -, < " . 't4ÎL- . -~I'-, . /,"~6rs~~N~~&FI.OBIIÜ" .HU~N·tHONÚ'''SHAWND~ \S'-t,~-t ,>..-~c:.~;~~ ~ 039Ac: ,~~ ~", '~-'; . --JI' " .Þ'" \S'~ V ,~ · '. i&. . . , ,Q~ "". T.......: '. " ~V. .. , .}..?" .~,:..., ~ .. , . r-.<VV-.' .. 6UUCK OERECKC&JEt-¡NIFERM G~A"!Y DANIE~.w & ;JOYCE F v . . 04þ"A<; .. a ...... 031·Ac: ., . - . .' ~, .~.. ; . ~~()íZ ·~ITCHEL~D'}ŠHAWN.AH . 4', ~ ., . ,O.:r3Ac ~~ .. ' . . II...{ .. ~--"t. .... , A ., ORSINGI;;R JACKA'''' O€BOI'1Af-I J ~ 0.3Š Ac WARD MICHAELW&MCr S - O.32'Ac . - TARTER ROBERTA8.'MJ,RY.M , ~ 0.45'';(: .' " .,.. <1"- \. , \ -~~,. . '. . , ~ ~ . ~l ;; ,\ : F , . ~(J. ªt.- '- \ , ~ ) I ! (, . , ,.' ,..¡; ~.. ~~ jM.ERTC , ........... G\{ERTIN"MICHAE,~& ~ I" . . 0.23 Ac "II' . '; ,f ~. - ). ~ ,._,,~<~ . ~. ~. ., .: , ..... ..~ . ,() ~ ~ ~ ; ('II ~ 'J, . ; ~~ . '---- 'c. \ GleSON' CHARtESL II 'Hi~'¡Ì" . . .~ ...' . - ;,' ~. p; . ... ~ r :" .,o ~..,. \,~. ~ . I ~.'I "')~'~.\..' f.r ~ l ~ ,'~ .' 1 , LEONARD THOMAS 0 & JI;;RRY L HO 1.87 Ac .~'. , . , '" ¡..tJ\ OR Ø3.-'f SíR...,· ,6 \l¡"\'O=- 1#1'1 ."Z-' . ..~, ~ PAJ..MER~D~\'lqA &,cONN!ËM~ . r '., 0.37/A<: 1.;. . . -0>&.. ~ ... .....L I" LJepartment of Community Development Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 100 Fee! D Roanoke County Properties I I I I I I . I I \ 1'\ WERLE LYNN D & REBEKAH S 0.26 Ac " TARTER ROBERT A & MARY M 045 Ac BARKER DALE & KIMBERLY 047 Ac J_ U 7 () MITCHELL RONALD R & SHIRLEY C 0.29 Ac KIM OKSON & WON LEE & SE JOON 0.26 Ac I ~ ROBERTS BRIAN 0 &-TRACEY D 0.34 Ac ... GALLAGHER BESSIE A 0.3Ac ~ ~ ARD BRIAN F 1\ ROBIN L 0.31 Ac HUGHES ANTHONY S & SHAWN D LO 0.39 Ac i: '.t.- " f;, I~ ;r ,r \~ '" ';:0 I ' GIBSON CHARLES L II 1.99Ac I \S'~ 01:; ~ ~ú\ ~(\ ;>. \:~ '?-~ fv'v~ Ç> :. () ';.'::' . . ~ GEARY DANIEL W & JOYCE F 0.31 At; BUUCK DERECK C & JENNIFER M 0.49 Ac . ~ KOTZ MITCHELL D & SHAWNA H 0.23 Ac ORSINGER JACK A & DEBORAH J 0.35 Ac DUDLEY JAMES C 0.43 Ac WARD MICHAEL W & MON.~ S 0.32 Ac . ',', PASCOE VAlINDA KAE 0.23 Ac SCOTT JOHN G 0.34 Ac HANKINS JONATHAN K 1\ PAMELA D 029 Ac 079.0 1 ~03-24 .00-0000 2909 JAE VALLEY RD 1.08 Ac MINNIX ROBERT C 0.45 Ac '.'." LEONARD T~OMAS 0 & JERRY L HO - 1.87 Ac GUERTIN' MICHAEL JAMES & 0.23 Ac ') MATZUGA ROBERT C & 0.22 Ac HARTIN CHARLES W JR & AMANDA 0.41 Ac 079.01-03-25.00-0000 o JAE VALLEY.RD; 0.76 Ac ... PERKINS DAVID S 1\ KAREN A 0.23 Ac CHASTAIN DENNIS W 1\ BRENDA M 0.28 Ac ROBERTSON GLENN L & RUTH KING 0.45 Ac . "._ì STUART CONSTANCE S 0.37 Ac SEXTON DANNY T & LUCY A 0.33 Ac '0 ,f!' ;0 I.:; ,';. ""~ ·0 'm .0 \13 HOLLAND ERNEST WAYNE 1\ JACQUE 0.42 Ac .. ("; KARKENNV IBNi;INA& SAMAR D 115 Ac . BARTLETT LARRY ALLE:-I' 0.34 Ac , . ROBERTS JOYCE M 0.39Ac' -ro'r:.f>-tJI O~ ,_ tJ}<:'{ S \" .' ...- . 'J_~~~::' -' -' - .(/) \,?- PALMER DAVID A 1\ CONNIE M 0.37 Ac V I I. I úepartment of Community Development Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station 8 August, 2005 o 2S 50 I I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties Bent Mountain Fire and Rescue Station 1 I n~_=----- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 9606 Bent Mountain Road Year of Original Construction: 1980 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 7,320 Acreage of Site: 1.92 Tax Map Number: 103.00-03-47.00-0000 Zoning: AV Current Use: Fire Company # 8, Rescue Squad BL.ANKENSHIP'E~RT ~& DOROTH S.24·Ac .. ~ " .;A ! .. ~ '.KING CARSON - tI 48.61 f><; ~ ~ I . !~ .. ....... " " SINK D RONALD 025 Ai:; .' .. .. ~ - .'1. .~ . fA- - ~ I I .:. of'" .s.u,I:I(3,~ GAP RD .. - .. ,,' 103.00-03-47.00-0000 9608 BEÑT'M0l!.1N[AIN RD ~' 1.92 Ac - --. WALTERS CARLTON WlllARD'& CLA _6.25 Ai:; "-. - ~~ -.. --;, .. ............ . --- , '~.. . .. , ,'1 , 0 Q::"' I~ ;5-- ~, .~.... , ! §-. J -7. l- I <-. " f#' " I MONTUORI ANTONIO & LENORA W 31.29Ac Bent Mountain Fire and Rescue Station ùepartment of Community Development 8 August. 2005 o 25 50 100 Fee! I . i ~ I I . i I D Roanoke County Properties BLANKENSHIP ELBERT L & DOROTH 5.24 Ac SINK 0 RONALD 0.25 Ac WALTERS CARLTON WILLARD & CLA 5.25 Ac REED GLENN L 1 Ac ANGLE SUE TINSLEY 17 Ac CL 11::: ~ ~. ~. ::::J, 0: ~. ¡.... <' IJ.¡: f1J COMMONWfALTH OF VA 14.16 A<: 8 August, 2005 uepartment of Community Development o 25 50 100 Feet I I I I ~ I I I I KING CARSON 48.61 Ac 103.00-03-47.00-0000 9606 BENT MOUNTAIN RD 1.92 Ac MONTUORI ANTONIO & LENORA W 31.29 Ac Bent Mountain Fire and Rescue Station D Roanoke County Properties Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Station I ry.':' -'- '.' -' ...~ '-: ..'.... _..~~~. - BUILDING PROFILE Address: 5342 Indian Grave Rd. Year of Original Construction: 1975 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 2002 (addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 10,725 Acreage of Site: 1.98 Tax Map Number: 098.01-01-01.00-0000 Zoning: C2CVOD Current Use: Fire Company # 7, Rescue Squad ,.('¡Ç)- ~~ "'~"¡"k; , . ',<q.- ~() ,. ~ ,,' ~ tf ,. .0 < ;[ i .§ .. " '. ,~ !~ ,'" '''0, ", . . ! " ,. , ... ....<........ :trt "- . ""'.\~ .. a!::__._. ""~ ". ... ~." ---. '-' J. l , ;; ~ ........... ., .. , . . ~ .' .' "'-J 098.Ó1-01-01.90-<J..gOo:T . ... 5342 INDIAN G~/D . ~ 1.98.1/ , ~. !- ~j !J_ ~~ . LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Station o 25 50 I I I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties MILLER J MILTON 115 lie ,.<') ~/, q; ?LAG ^'~ -11: ~/ ,~1- .(', ,~ 'rb <..~-. .. \.- .",;.. f~\J CÖUNTV SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 0.81 Ac INDIAN GRAVE PARTNERSHIP 0713 Ac .,' ..; """,.': ,. .' ~ fLAG ~ i~.1 SHEPHERD JOEL R &ANN CLAJRE 6.675 Ac 098.01-01-01.00-0000 . 5342 INDIAN GRAVE RD' 1.98 Ac ,. HARTMAN ALVIN G & PEGGY H . 0.58 Ac . ~. -i') HARTMAN ALVIN G & PEGGY H 0.07 Ac MCBROOM JOHN W 7.31 At;; PRESSON. RUSSELL D&MARSHA H 0..51 Ac . ~ -." . '. ~ WEBB TONY ALLEN O.49'AC LEIGH NATHAN T &ARMIDAJ -1.17 lie , -(', WEBB SAM R & MYRTLE H 2.78 Ac WEBB NATHAN TODD & OIANA G OWAc WEBB NATHAN TODD & DANA S 1.05Ac EVANGEL FOURSQUARE CHURCH TRUS 48,65 Ac l-UMSDEN NEWTON DENVER & MARY 2.89 Ac Uepartment of Community Development Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Station 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 J I 100 Feet I I D Roanoke County Properties Fort Lewis Fire Station I -~~- ----. --- - - - - - --- - - ---- ~ - - ---~- ------.- - - - -- -- - ---~-- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3915 West Main Street Year of Original Construction: 1980-1981 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1999 (sleeping area/bunk room addition) Square Footage of Current Building: 12,244 Acreage of Site: 3.52 Tax Map Number: 055.13-01-02.00-0000 Zoning: Cl Current Use: Fire Company # 9 LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 I . I I I '00 Feet I I Fort Lewis Fire Station D Roanoke County Properties R L R INVESTMENTS L L C 26.72 Ae "-. FRITO LAY INC 705 Ac " 'I,:.....-.:,,':...Oi'~ o \ SWlTzm CALVIN M LIFE ESTATE ., 1.1Ae KING ROBERT JOHN 1.6Ae \~:\) \. MINI WORLD CHILD CARE CENTER I' t.58Ac .' ~ :. r; < ~ ", -' , '~- ..,:...-.- -",' JRE ROANOKE LLC 1.1 Ac Department of Community Development 8 August, 2005 o 25 50 TOO Feel I I I I I It. I 055.13-01-02.00-0000 3915 WEST MAIN ST 3.52 Ac '. si. -,§.' \t-~~, ~ f·~; ~ .' ..~·v \, JRE ROANOKE LlC 445 ~e , , . I.,..; . / Fort Lewis Fire Station ". Q RICHFIELD RETJR.EMENT COMMUNITY ',t B.nAe (j) ~ ",1) :l_ 1)(: o " .. \ \ 055.13-01-02.02-0000 3917 DAUGHERTY RD 3.93Ac ''/ ..' .7 ,. \ " , , BILLBOARD ROANOKE EQUIPMENT CO 3.25 Ac . , D Roanoke County Properties Masons Cove Fire and Rescue Station I ""/ /" /" / BUILDING PROFILE Address: 3810 Bradshaw Road Year of Original Construction: 1969 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1987-1988 (additional bay, living area) Square Footage of Current Building: 9,552 Acreage of Site: 1.00 Tax Map Number: 015.02-04-01.00-0000, 015.02-01-34.01-0000 Zoning-: AR Current Use: Fire Company # 10, Catawba-Masons Cove Rescue Squad .> - ." "- ~ . .... . . . . , ... .. I ¡~_~:,,~.J ",. Q 88,Aí:"""-" .,~ ~--- 1-, - .... ¡ ,;...~ I " --..: ~._- \J"t 01.~_)' - 3810 ßRAD8HA~I"" 1 Ac " , .~- '. t.JR ". :.<1DSL .... 'y..qf1,r RO " '-..4 --7 l ¡ .i / i .. .' - í / ,~ \' . \ t¥15.02-01-34.0 1-0000 /' p93 BRADSHAW RCi " O.72Ac ( " GllLlS\:i IE CHARLES EDWAJ1 L\ II ," - . / 0.51 Ac ',,J' I - J t . .. r ~lA~STEVEN.C D~9~"'" - If BANDY STEVEIII C 2'Âc - ~ .f r :i - '"" I ~. - .. , " . j f .' / .:j - ~ .. ... BANDY STEVEN C 0.56 "c' MASONS COVE CIV1C CLÙB IIIIC 0.36Ac ' ....... , . .. RICE PAUL S JR 1.64 Ac GILLISPIE CHARLE'STEDWARO & 1.24Ac - .. ... .~~ .. GllUSPIEtQ..UANE BENNETT 21t36 Ac . GilLISPIE DUANE BENNETT 28.36Ac Department of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Masons Cove Fire and Rescue Station o 25 50 100 Feel I I I I I I I . I D Roanoke County Properties BANDY PHilLIP ANDREW & RHONDA 274 Ae BANDY WALTER G & BRENDA M 441 Ae GilLISPIE DUANE BENNETT OAe GilLISPIE DUANE BENNETT 1352 Ac MillER CARL F & LINDSAY A PRI 088 Ae ·&fV4Ds ·1j~W . - f?D BANDY STEVEN C 0.98 Ae 015.02-04-01.00-0000 3810 BRADSHAW RD 1 Ac SHELTON ROGER l & llNDA 8 1.04 Ac . BANDY STEVEN C 2Ae .~: C'ft 5.02-01-34.01-0000·': 2793 BRADSHAW Rr::' , 0.72 Ac .:; GllLl:;Ç'IE CHARLES EDWARD & : 0.51 Ae GilliSPIE CHARLES EDWARD & 1.61 Ae BANDY STEVEN C 0.56 Ae MASONS COVE CIVIC CLUB INC 0.36 Ac RICE PAUL S JR 1.64 Ac GilliSPIE CHARLES EDWARD & 1.24Ae GilLISPIE DUANE BENNETT 28.36 Ac GilliSPIE DUANE BENNETT 28.36 Ac Department of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Masons Cove Fire and Rescue Station o 2S 50 I I 100 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station I BUILDING PROFILE Address: 7125 Bent Mountain Road Year of Original Construction: 1989 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): Square Footage of Current Building: 9,440 Acreage of Site: 5.17 Tax Map Number: 095.01-01-04.01-0000 Zoning: AV Current Use: Fire Company # 11, Rescue Squad uepartment of Community Development Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station 8 August, 2005 o 50 100 I I I I 200 F""t I I D Roanoke County Properties RICHARDS CHARLES E 1 Ae TAYLOR GLORIA T 9.51 Ae I\.IARTIN ROBERT R & DOROTHY W M RIALL JAMES D & KATHRYN M PARRISH THOMAS G & RANDALL G 1.7SAe I.G6Ae 1.01Ae FIVE PRINCESSES LLC 0.12Ae FIVE PRINCESSES LLC 84.2 Ae SMITH RICHARD W & DONNA K 2.13Ae KESSING STEPHEN L80 BARBARA A JELLERSON JEFFREY K & VALORIE 106 Ac 1.07 Ae POLLOCK DONALD R 8. DENISE M 2.22 Ae _ ':i~~ F.!E_LDS FARM DR NASH STEVEN L 8. DEBORAH P 2.93 Ae TATE JAMES Pili 8. KATHLEEN M SIMMONS NANCY C 1Ae 1.02Ae FIVE PRINCESSES LLC 6.33 Ae ~ ~(I-: ~ °O( .·.OOIf .' '. tJ\lO , , ,~ Ii'~ KIT'f ;~10ER RICHARD.J ·"f,õ'[i k. '\-. BOSCHE NEAL E & KIMBERLY W 2Ae FINKLER BETH R 1.17 Ac BOSCHE NEAl E 8. KIMBERLY W 1.7 Ac !"OFF ALVIN D & PATRICIAA 1.16 Ae FELIX STEVEN 8. RACHEL ANN . 2.87 Ac -"'.. 095.01-01-04.01-0000- 7125 BENT MOUNTAIN RD 5.17 Ac COHEN ADAM J 8. 1.91 Ac ., 'KITTINGER CLAUDE D III 8. -. 132Ae ,I LEWIS GALE BUILDING cCAPORATIO 1.41 Ac UNKNOWI'IOWNER O.9Ac DRISCOLL TIM J 8. NORMA L 8.66 Ae SHEARER LAWRENCE E & MARTHAA 12Ac: BOWMAN TROY L&ALMAJ~N¡'.·· 08Ac . ~o ~"I:¡Io.\~ 0o - ~>¡.1\ ~~~ COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE . 7 Ae . \ HAYNES FRED L SF! & GALE C LIEB~ RODERICK K 0.59 Ac 0.63 Ac , LEWIS WILLIAM R 8. 0.57 Ac AKERS LAARV T & TEQUITA 0 0.57 Ae MUSE EMMETT M SR & JOSEPHINE 0.59 Ae CLAUSE HARRY PAULJR OAe uepartment of Community Development Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station 8 August, 2005 o I so 100 I I I 200 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties Read Mountain Fire and Rescue Station ) . ......,; ". .-~... ..u~- BUILDING PROFILE Address: 43 East Park Drive; Botetourt County, 24090 Year of Original Construction: 1991 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 2004 (2 bay addition) Square Footage of Current Building: Acreage of Site: 2.225 Tax Map Number: 108(13)1 Zoning: Current Use: Fire Company # 12, Rescue Squad Roanoke County Career Center (Old William Byrd School) BUILDING PROFILE Address: 100 Highland Road Year of Original Construction: 1930-1932 Years of Major Renovation(s)/Addition(s): 1935; 1938; 1953; 1955; 1959 Square Footage of Current Building: 52,841 Acreage of Site: 17.16 Tax Map Number: 060.11-04-20.00-0000 Zoning: R2 Current Use: Roanoke County Career Center LJepartment of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Old William Byrd School o I 50 100 I I 200 Feel I I D Roanoke County Properties ?~' (, ~~ '. 0. ~i' I/. ~~ .%-- ~~. <.1',.. .,;;~ Q -OE'~~!:V~_- ~<v <v~ ~"?-\; ~ ~OWN 'OF VINTON" " 0.5Ac \" '~ """ ... ''', "'- -'........ '-... ". '. .... . " "'" ',TOWN OF VINTON . "~ OAe "~ \,. -.;, '\" " . '~. , \, ,. '" ". I. .:. . , .'~ ,HOLDREN$ COUNTRY. STORE INC \, \ " 1.15Ac"""" '< . ..... ... \ ," ,~ , HOLDRENS COUNTRY STORE INC ,. 0:1~ .'. . J¡"',xÒiSON'AVE. W IV>_ "UAc - ". ". \ 'b ~ '. ~~ ~ . Ò~ '<t-, ,<:> c} , o*" ~ <ö ¡ j ( \ ~ , , f ". \, CJ. .' ,~. ò~ '. \$\,.. f 060.11-04-20.00-0000 ' 100 HIGHLAND RD COUNTY SCI-fOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE 17 Ac 17 Ac ~,~ , '\<>¿ tP " .-t. '\' '..~, LESLIE CI-fARLES E , () 0.$9 Ac '. <S! '; 'Ç:,. ''.0\ \ , :" ~ ~<v ~~ +-<v~ . '. ~ r ~ 'TOWN OF VINTON 0.15Ac .~ MIL~~ OREA. MAWIMMER /'~.,. ~~ OAe . \ '\ / "\ TOWN ~F VINTON /\ OAe / \-/' -, ,~ .. ...::' STCLAIR ,THOMAS S & TERRI E, " ,,' \'0,87Ae \ r~iJNTY SC~(")Ol. BOAAì~. OF ROANOKE .....:. HODGES~:~ACK D &'-M KIM TOWN ~~~INTON ,. . ,.\ O,:¡¡¡ Ac '\ ,",I -- DAWKINS JESSE C 0..34 Ac " MOUNTAIN CREST LANÓ COMPAN~'CÚU~+~:' SCHOOL BOARD OF\-DANOKF \.. .'. 'DAWKINS JESSIE CALVIN & OAe o Ae - "'. 0,94 lie '.' c··- 0 Ae / ~ . i-\ MOUNTAIN CREST LAND eOM~'?(" "VJ- ", YOUNG JEFFREY S & JOYCE B o Ae ¡yO HALE ALAN D & i<A1'~' ':! J~~!",S HO,,-,",ARD W & LINDA M 128 Ac MOUNTAINCR~STLANDCf"~~NY OAe 15'-;",,' 'O,O:Ae \ o Ae ~ BRALLEY VICTOR L JAMES HOWARD W & LINDA M CROCKETT MATTIE L ' OAe Q.79AG 'OAe HODGES JONTHAN M & ROBINSON AUDLEY C JR 088 Ae 0.28 Ae '<. -' MOUNTAIN CREST LAND (,"¡.Ii"ANY· OAt' -'. COUNTY 5CHOQL~~<J_~'j:D OF ROANOKE, -.. 0'Àc " ~ '[fe', ::(fiD 1':' ' ,__, ,'{&0'!' .... DAWKINS JESSE ç OAe OAe TOWN OF VINTON 6.81 Ac ~ HOME SOURCE LLC \ 0.48 Ac DAWKINS JESSIE CALVIN & HATCHER JACKIE BOYD & SUSAN P WINTER PROPERTIES PARTNERS~IP 'OAe OAe 0.78Ac JOHNSON MILTONE BRYANT WALLACE B &AVONDAA HODGES JONTHAN M & KNOX CLIFTON BII OAe OAe OAe OAe TOWN OF VINTON SOLOMON STEVEN M &ANGElIA C ,RADFORD ¡LOR S 0,31 Ac MCCOYSHENANM OAe EASTWILLIAME '- ~oAd1lL OAe OAe ".. _l:£'~'~NOFVINTON WALDRON MARK S & PRISCILLA F FULLER ROBERT GARLAND '. £".16 Ac PALMER JEAN C OAe 0 Ae MCCLUNG DAVID S II & MARGARET 1.14Ac OAe YOUNG JEFFREY S & JOYCE B OAe uepartment of Community Development Old William Byrd School 8 August, 2005 o 50 100 , I i I 200 Feet I I D Roanoke County Properties 60·-- .I.' ,., - . l .' " \ KIDO' DIWIDE &VIRGlNIAL . 6A~ r ¥ ~'\'.'" ~, Department of Community Development Taylor Tract 8 August, 2005 o 50 100 I I I I 200 Fae! I I D Roanoke County Properties GREGORY JEfFREY N & CORY B C.34 At;: .. HARRELL EARL G JR &. NANCY ~ "--- CAe' SWEENEY JERRY E & DENISE W OAe MCGARRY RICHARD J & LORETTA M OAe TESTER BRENDAW . OAe' J? '. MAGEE CHRIS E & MARGARET G k --, - OAe I . LAn Q." " HARTMAN ROGER ._~.k. elf? ;s i' OAe / AROCA ARTURO C & EVELYN _ .r~TER CAREY E & BEfTY C OAe' Q-.: OAej PARKER LARRY D MONTGOMERY' El AAB:E'ÌH A CAe OAe ~, .' CARLTON MICHAEL W & KATHERINE CALDWELL MARGARET T OAe i OAe I HOSS GARY R CAe PROCTOR JOSEPH E JR & EMILY H OAe SPRUCEWOOD ASSOCIATES INC 028 Ac PULLEN BETTY R MCG1J~RE MICHAEL M & DENISE M OAe .0 Ae VARELA ~CTOfI EDUARDO TAMEl & OAe DONALDSON'RAQUELL . OAc J0DGE ROBERT J & GINA M DANIELS JAMES A LACASSE THOMAS l.' , OAe OAc . QAe I :OR : ,RAUCH LUZZI MARGUERITI; M & 1.J\!>i\\NGO_""NE/>,L. RICHARD 0 & MARY ELLE Me . . OAC CURRIER KÉNNETH L &CHINAE A OAe PAYNE JOHN A JR & LYNN P OAe ...... , '< .-"<" ....--,. '. .. , \' ' ,\ \ '. \ ~. . ." '. ., COUNTY SCHOOL t.oARD OF ROANOKE 80\~ \ \ \ \~ \ .~ \ ,'8: ,,?- '"% ~ \ \ \ \ !~. TAYlOR JEAN MOYLÀN 2.5JAc > '.. \ 097.05-01-26.00-0000 5690 MERRIMAN RD 28.71 Ac ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 28.71 Ac ..," ,. MORR~ON. JAMESA \~59 Ac \ . STANLEY KENNETH H \ 0.49"'" HARTMAN SONIA 0.5Ac TA;lOR FREDERICK ELWOOD JR ~ 8.82 Ac ..:""" " ._~. . "....Y. '~.... "', ""' 0{~ ~.':.t.~ (\,'S'" . ,,/:>' ,".'j1,tf- (:':"'I¡-., . Vi: SN1(Ç¡O:c(~ONNIE IRENE I<JNGERY J /" O.H"'" '.' '. . -,¡.~ - ........ ,~ ' WILLIAMS ,~",'j:¡REN'W & HELEN B SPRADLIN GRACE M ,,"0.31 Ac .. \ 028 Ac \\ SWEENEY DENISE W COVENANT REFORMED EPISCOPAL CH , . '0.28 Ac OA 7 Ac . ~YDER BONNIE IRENE KINGERY J . \ W~ WESTERN V1RGIN.A WATER AUTHORI 0.248 Ac\.. GUTHRIE BILLY B & BARBARA B . 1263 Ac " ROANOKE COUNTYSC¡';(:;{)L BOARD OAc '\" ' '-;... " KIDD DAVID E & VI¡:¡OINIAJ 6.73 Ac 097.05-01-24.00-0000 5737 CRYSTAL CREEK DR 9.847 Ac ',. KIDD DAVID E & VIRGINIA l V7Ac .'. 097.05~01-01 ,00-0000 6461 MERRIMAN RD \ . 1 "\1 Ac STARKEY PROPERTiES LLC OAc KIDD. DAVID E & VIRGINIA L 6Ae Department of Community Development 8 August, 2005 Taylor Tract 50 100 I I I 200 Feet I I D Roanoke County Properties ACTION NO. ITEM NO. r-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August23,2005 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss proposed new County vehicle maintenance facility SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services Elmer C. Hodge ê jt County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to update the Board on plans for a new vehicle maintenance facility. This project was ranked highly by the CIP review committee, and due to the load on our current facility, it is becoming increasingly important to County operations. .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,2005 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. R- \ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 2005 Recognition of Roanoke County preschool programs for earning accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young Children Elmer C. Hodge ~ )f~ County Administrator AGENDA ITEM: APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County preschools at Back Creek, Bonsack, Burlington, Green Valley, and W. E. Cundiff elementary schools are the first preschools in the state to be accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children. The accreditation lasts for five years. The schools began working toward accreditation in April 2003 by conducting a self study. Surveys were completed and the preschools were observed by independent, professional validators and reviewed by a national panel. Some of the criteria for accreditation included: (1) interactions among teachers and children; (2) physical environment; (3) nutrition and food services; and (4) staff qualifications and professional development. The County's 17 preschool classrooms currently serve 197 children who are receiving special education services, who qualify for the Virginia Preschool Initiative Program, or whose parents are Roanoke County employees and pay tuition. All the teachers are endorsed in early children special education. The preschools are supported by grants from the Roanoke Valley United Way Success By Six Program and the County's Parks and Recreation Department. Ms. Sharon Sheppard, the County's preschool program coordinator and special education regional coordinator for East County, will be present at the meeting. The following preschool teachers will be present: Robin Vest from Back Creek; Ashley Jones from Bonsack; Jamie Harvey from Burlington; Leigh-Anne Williams from Green Valley; and Lynne Thrasher from W. E. Cundiff. We have also invited the principals from the elementary schools, the School Board members, and School Superintendent Weber to attend. .. (,ount!' of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO THE Preschool Programs at Back Creek. Bonsack. Burlington. Green Valley and w. E. Cundiff Elementary Schools ~ The Preschool Programs at Back Creek, Bonsack, Burlington, Green Valley, and W. E. Cundiff Elementary Schools have earned accreditation from the National Association for the Education of Young People. ~ These County Preschool Programs are the first preschools in the state to be accredited which is a significant achievement. ~ Some of the criteria for accreditation included: (1) interactions among teachers and children; (2) physical environment; (3) nutrition and food services; and (4) staff qualifications and professional development. ~ The Board of Supervisors expresses its appreciation to the preschool teachers, instructional assistants, and support staff at each school for their dedication in making the program successful and meeting the needs of the students. Presented this 23th day of August, 2005.£ 'l't)' Î1. Michael W. Altizer, Chai \Yl~Q. W Michael A. Wray, Vice-Chai~ ~ß. "~Id. .(Jk~ oseph B. "Butch" Church ~,~-.S> G. ~ c:w .... Richard C. Flora cw ~_.u__ t!/"ePh P. McNamara S-I PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Seaside Heights, LLC (Bojangles) 32-12/2004 (Rezoning) & 33-12/2004 (SUP) Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 16, 2005 (Rescheduled from August 2, 2005; Continued from December 7, 2004) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 15, 2005 (Continued from August 23, 2005 and December 21, 2004) A. REQUEST The petition of Seaside Heights, LLC, to rezone .98 acres from C1, Office District to C-2, General Commercial District and to obtain a Special Use Permit on 2.22 acres for the operation of a fast food restaurant and drive- thru located at the intersections of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Eight citizens spoke. John Thompson, 5224 Springlawn Avenue, voiced concerns about the driveway access from Merriman Road, and suggested not using that driveway. Cindy Webster, 4714 Colonial Avenue, stated that proffer #4 does not help Colonial Avenue traffic, and suggested the petitioners explore some type of frontage road access along Brambleton Avenue from the traffic signal at Pleasant Hill Drive. Steven Wade Sutherland, 4810 Colonial Avenue, commented on statistical discrepancies in the traffic impact study. Margaret Jones, 5202 Merriman Road, asked that neither the rezoning or special use permit be approved. Kevin Clifford, 5103 Springlawn Avenue, voiced concerns about existing traffic using Spring lawn Avenue as a cut-through from Brambleton Ave to Colonial Ave. Charlie Parker, 4956 Merriman Road, commented that the proposed driveway access plan won't work, and that cut-through traffic on Springlawn Avenue was already a problem. Gloria Christen, 5123 Spring lawn Avenue, voiced concerns about speeding and cut-through traffic on Springlawn Avenue, and asked the County to please solve the existing traffic situation first before approving this use. Ray Jamison, 3621 Colonial Avenue, stated the need to slow traffic on Merriman Road, and that the idea of a frontage road access to the project from Brambleton Avenue was the only way for it to work. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Holladay presented the staff report. Maryellen Goodlatte, counsel for the petitioner, followed with additional presentation. Mr. McNeil asked Mr. Ford if any improvements to the Brambleton Ave and Colonial Ave intersections were on the VDOT six-year plan. Mr. Azar asked Mr. Ford for clarification of some information in the traffic study, and about some broader issues of traffic flow in the vicinity. Mr. Ford responded that no 8-2 improvements to the intersection were on the six-year plan, reviewed the traffic study information, and discussed potential ideas for better coordinating traffic flow in the vicinity. Mr. Azar and Mr. McNeil asked the petitioner how they anticipated achieving proffer #4 to prohibit right turns onto Merriman Road. The petitioner presented several possible engineering solutions to restrict turning movements. Mr. McNeil and staff discussed challenges and methods of enforcing proffer #4. Mr. Azar voiced concerns about the project's impacts to "level of service" at nearby intersections, and suggested eliminating the Merriman Road driveway. Mr. Jarrell voiced concerns about proffer #4 functioning, and with potential cut- through traffic on the site. Mr. Thomason stated he was not convinced the access would work. When making a motion to recommend denial of the petitions, Mr. McNeil cited traffic on Colonial Avenue, problems with the Merriman Road driveway access and cut-through traffic. D. CONDITIONS 1. The development of the property shall substantially conform with the site plan entitled "Site Layout and Grading Plan for RoBo, LLC., dated July 12, 2005, attached as Exhibit A, with driveway access only from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, subject to those changes required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2. The exterior of the fast food restaurant to be constructed on the Property shall substantially conform to the photographs attached as Exhibit B. 3. All buildings exterior walls shall be brick from grade to eave. 4. The Merriman Road driveway shall be designed to prohibit right turns onto Merriman Road. 5. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 6. Any freestanding sign shall be a monument style not to exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width, and shall have brick construction to match the buildings. 7. The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 8. The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. 9. Dumpsters shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. 2 8-1 10. Portions of the front yards along Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road rights-of-way designated on the concept plan for landscaping shall remain as open green spaces, and landscaped with any combination of flowers, shrubs, ground cover or trees. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. McNeil made a motion to recommend denial of the rezoning, followed by a motion to recommend denial of the special use permit. Both motions carried 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 3 GLENN FELDMANN r:.,(;') DARBY /0",:" ~'~~':-../ ------ GOODLATIE 210 1st Street S.W Suite 200 Post Office Box 2887 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 540.2248000 Fax 540.224.8050 gfdg@gfdg.com *S VVn ,<-'~~?( ~/ . .__ '\,6...- ~(-~~~f)'5 "\:'1.', ,'" - ., ,1 9 / ~;J~. /~l,¡;,:? ,"'r ~~J ~ ,,-,¡: -,' 8-1 MARYELLENF. GOODLATIE Direct Dial (540) 224-8018 E-mail mgoodlatte@gfdg.com August 18, 2005 The Honorable Michael W. Altizer Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Re: Seaside Heights, LLC: Rezoning and Special Exception Permit Dear Chairman Altizer: We represent Seaside Heights, LLC, which has applied for a rezoning and special exception for property located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The petition is scheduled to be considered by the Board this Tuesday, August 23. Earlier this week, the Planning Commission considered our request and recommended denial of that request to the Board. The petitioner would like the opportunity to explore options associated with the development. Accordingly, we would respectfully request that the hearing scheduled for this Tuesday be continued. Rather than continuing the hearing on a month-to-month basis, which can be difficult for citizens, we request that it be continued to a date certain - to November 15. That should allow us enough time to analyze options with respect to site development. I will attend next Tuesday evening's Board meeting should there be any questions about this request for a continuance. Very truly yours, ~ Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:lnh:5798000 c: The Honorable Michael A. Wray Mr. Stan Seymour 8-1 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INRE: SEASIDE HEIGHTS, LLC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VOLUNTARY PROFFER OF CONDITIONS REZONING OF TAX MAP NUMBERS: 086.08-03-36.01 (.68 acres) and 086.08-03-35.01 (.298 acres) Applicant, Seaside Heights, LLC, hereby proffers that the above-referenced property, if rezoned to C-2, commercial, will be developed as follows: 1. The development of the property shall substantially confonn with the site plan entitled "Site Layout and Grading Plan for RoBo, LLC," dated July 28 2005, attached as Exhibit A, with driveway access only from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, subj ect to those changes required by Roanoke County during its comprehensive site plan review. 2. The exterior of the fast food restaurant to be constructed on the Property shall substantially confonn to the photographs attached as Exhibit B. 3. All building exterior walls shall be brick from grade to eave. 4. The Merriman Road driveway shall be designed to prohibit right turns onto Merriman Road. 5. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 6. Any freestanding sign shall be a monument style not to exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width, and shall have brick construction to match the buildings 7. The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 8. The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. 9. Dumpsters shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 8-1 10. Portions of the front yards along the Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road rights-of-way designated on the concept plan for landscaping shall remain as open green spaces, and landscaped with any combination of flowers, shrubs, ground cover or trees. Respectfully submitted, By: 2 ~! ~ J~ ~ ~¡ ~ ~ "'.,,, ~ f>il è<, ~ ~!~ : ~i ~i ""'I ;: :.o.~ ~ it~1 ~,' ~ ~~ !2 ¡~. ~ i:?; ¿- ~S-1 ::¡ i;j Î I I I~ ;;~ I ¡~:: ¡, ~ I ~¡I ê:~1 Ii:!!!' Œ & 0"-,,, ~i~'I"'¡ li'l ¡I¡ii'r . I ..' _/ ,i r . _ ,TI'!~ ; ,_.... 1,:.1 , . , : " ! . . . /;ê'-'CI\'" 1!J~rj'~:;lu~ .. _~. "",'" ~ w.,:" I ~vj¡~1~~"":'~'\ \\ \ <~- ,i. '-'l 'r. ,_."". . I' I __-"-~":~ "",' ~/\ j' // \' ~, I \ I I /' ó</' l" "," \~'" S;,:~\ \ \ ! I f (~f~~ ~~~ ~<." .y'~' ,\\'-'" .J<' f:~~ I \' I \ :. ¡ \ ',\ i¡¡ ,/" ,,' \}I j' 'I, Ii ..' ' ' , ,/' ,'(" \ ' .~ \ \t~~\ ~._ . ,,->,~</ ~~:~~ ;.:< '~'\ \ I ~ "". - ~- ' ", ' I ,.' ) \~h ~"'r-'ì:Y'" ' "~! ;.^ -)-,\ 'i'\ ¡' , " ',0 .Y' """, > , 'r- ,., ~ ,'" ",\ "~,. ' ! ,.7'''' , " e· "\' " V· ... " .-/,/ , ' , ,. ".,' ' ri'. " ' \ ,.\, " \ \, , "/:: ':1 ,j, ~\\" ¡ ,I), \ '\ ' '~.~)' \, ~ ,-, \ '7; I ~i \ " ' ~I/À"'" , \ \ /\.-.:r; ;'<:y" í " \~ ,~'f.~\ .)._,---,,,,-- í ý~.:" ;;\ý \ \ \ I * 'I ' \ '.\1;)" \, \ UII ,-( \ \ \ \.' ',\.j..v \ 1 ". ., ÿ' ",^,-", , ' I f~\ " \ '. '. \. )./~.-. " \ \,' " { , " ...' " ',-C''''-\ \ \, 'o®\ \ ,'\ ¡ I ' , r' '\, , , ... , ., \ ' ,"'1 ",\\ ,/ "":~ \ ' \ \ ' ' ' \' ' /'~." I¡ C:," .",I --.J \. \\ \ i I ~t~ " ' , \ ' \ ~?! ¡ I';,~';;;-~ ' \ ' \. i I" f "',' . .-~ \ '., \6\ ' " ÿ;:"-'-.':";: j , ,. ' I 'l" ¡¡G"~' \~/ .,\ \ í I if li~ ;;'=I'rf~~:~(//\ "", I ! J ì fr= f~~1 i··LI ,\ \ , .... . Æ--'''' . ' '-'I!~"r/~' .::;; Xf "". -'j ,i I :' \ \\ r-..._ -,.....: ,,~"--_. -1, -.~~ ! r- - -.--.--.. - i \ ¡;> I '¡," . j! ,I ..-- ..L ..~.J ~_\ic~B I ' J \ LI !1~;~j I \ ;¡ -- :¡___. .,-_. I ! --------- . J' ._-~--. ;I¡! ~~~ /'" ....."""~..,~'-_....--......__...--...:~-- .-.....,=........_...."""""r~-~,..--- Ii¡-¡- ¡ / ! i ¡ ; ! I ! I I / I ! ¡ / II/I ¡ ! , ¡ I' / ! / ! ! I I / YI;'.¡]I.\,' ¡!';''''¡;~;-t;-t; .~¡;j .' ¡ / ¡ I I ¡ f ¡ ! , l ! , I ! I i ¡ I I !) i' / 1 I ! " I ' I I ,,: , I.r I I ,.,' , !~!! i ,{ Ii I , ,(~; I i;¿ I I i I i I ! I I I : I ! ( I \ \ __....-2 i__ I~ ;.' i ,¡: ;, ~ i~;I~!i¡,! \ i,.~,~- --J .-~ ,..,,~' It..! ~t' _ s:';~ ;:::i~'¡:;¡¡~¡ , a ~"'., \' ~ ¡ TF' ~ cg t ~ ~ r.:~,: .! I!!;!~~ ~~ Q:: ~.' ,_ ~~ 'fEI, .J. _ ,t , i ~~"~ ¡:{~¡¡~ ~ I ¡~, Ii " h I}! ¡ ~~ !'¡1,j~~ J'd." - ~.~:....-,:~ -, i I I I I ¡ i i I I I ! ¡ I ¡ ....._'w-""...-"""""...~.._"'-_............__"'.~ Irn--r-- ,;~:'---'--- I , ; , . '- c" ,,;;~-- " f I / I . ,-' -r; / ! I I r-- .\~[I : r_ I ; , ' I ""I"'" . ;/ I .' ~ ~. ,," , i : I ¡ ,..~~~\;~\ . ! : / I ,¡ /" ~~:. ~ ""'\ \" ' I / , I ,I ,."y" ~. ~~-....\ '\ ~,.~)\ \ '\ " 8 ; I ;/ / I /" ",-s-<-;;-"--""" :\\'!, -\ \~ \- ,..;\ \, \ I "~I ,I ; , l _--... ,- ,.." . '" ~ \ --ë.' '\' '.1" I / .-"" ,- .' 1 [¡j¡ ! ! / / / <\";,:~,',.i",,,J ( \ or' if ::)\Î/v" \\ J\ \ ", , ' \, ,~~; _" .-?"" ~.....,././)I <.,- 'f~;' ' I ! ! I ,;~ \) ~\..~~ ~ \'< \',. '\\' i ,J /<i--.. Þr,' 'f~£Y'" ~ \'i\"',"'\~ \\ I I ", ,><,' ,/'" '\' '" \ v ',. / i //' .i0 <r,j ....., \,%,\,I,\I,\\(~7\ í"~ I ,:- '1\;;," \ ' \ ' I,Po'} ",Y í'-, t·; >¡:): > '\ f .f I I ",," \ '. \9\ \ >- 'it'" \ \ ,,-)' , \ \ , " f..-:-\" \ \ .. \ - ~~C-\~ \ ' , ' \ \ ",,-,./ {' " j:. I ¡,,,: " -\ '. ".-' .-f''\ '\ \ \,@\\\"I \ , 's, ,... I,' -( , ' " í I .,' I'· ~' .,,' "\ I ' " \' ,\ f : / ¿~ \(-, \\ '\, \ \ \ /" \,\ ' ! ,',' ':: "i~" ' ,,',\ \ \ \ I ," I I ,....:;~ : \ , \ "e:;;,,;! ':' ' \ I ,f I II -: :~' /. t~ ,_ ~ .;,: ~~ (~:;"»7"-' ~\ \ \, \'" \ \, \j.. "IfL"""'~ 7 .. \ '\ , , f>",C" ,~"" ' ,~/" \ J, j, ¡=" ;~"'j'~:':;':':'\"J'~':~"'" ", ! I ¡tl r- =-~~h ~ --~~~:-l' : --d '-:=-I:d_,r \ \\' ,r f ~._-- ' \ \ iií t - (~I I' ; \ ~'-:11!l:~j2.::ii; [;','-~: '~¡1; ~~ 11-, :\ \\ .... I " , ,I r--·'·...>....,·J (T/1 i~H I ' I \ ~:L~.J;:JL I J I :' ,,~ ' ,J,,___ ~ I, _,__ __, I ~-'- - "--- j' - ----.-- ì "-, ~ ~1 r.i~] ~ ~~i ~ ~I ~,- '~,." ~ ~I ~", ~ - ~~ § ~¡ ~i f~ ~ ~ ~ I., ~ ¡;; ¡!II L I I I I I I I I :¡ I \ \ I J .___ ----- ~--- +--_. <!- ß-1 J: ¿¡; J Ej~i b/+- .§-1 " ~. _.-~~ ~~.:..:--:- ~ - - , I 8-1 ~--ï 'I \ 8-1 Petitioner: STAFF REPORT Seaside Heights, LLC Request: Rezone .98 acres from Cl to C2C, and Special Use Permit on 2.22 acres for a fast food/drive through restaurant Location: Intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring Proffered/Suggested Conditions: 1. The development of the property shall substantially conform with the site plan entitled "Site Layout and Grading Plan for RoBo, LLC., dated July 12,2005, attached as Exhibit A, with driveway access only from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, subject to those changes required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2. The exterior of the fast food restaurant to be constructed on the Property shall substantially conform to the photographs attached as Exhibit B. 3. All buildings exterior walls shall be brick from grade to eave. 4. The Merriman Road driveway shall be designed to prohibit right turns onto Merriman Road. 5. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% ofthe building façade area. 6. Any freestanding sign shall be a monument style not to exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width, and shall have brick construction to match the buildings. 7. The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 8. The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. 9. Dumpsters shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. 10. Portions of the front yards along Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road rights-of-way designated on the concept plan for landscaping shall remain as open green spaces, and landscaped with any combination of flowers, shrubs, ground cover or trees. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Seaside Heights, LLC proposes to rezone .98 acres from Cl, Office District to C2C, General Commercial District with Conditions and obtain a Special Use Permit on 2.2 acres in order to construct a Bojangle's Restaurant. The property is located at the intersections of Bramble ton 1 8-1 Avenue, Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road and is zoned C 1 and C2. The petitioner also plans a 6,500 square foot retail building designed to house four tenants. The site is designated Core in the 2005 Roanoke County Community Plan, as well as the Colonial Avenue Corridor Study. Areas designated Core are where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses_ The proposed development conforms with the policies and guidelines of the Community Plan. The property lies within the Colonial Avenue Corridor as defined in the 1999- 2000 Colonial A venue Corridor Study. The study focused primarily on the residential areas along Colonial Avenue, and issues relating to conversion of residential land to commercial uses. Rather than conversion of single family homes to commercial use, this petition is for a redevelopment of two commercial properties and vacant commercial land. The study also addressed the street connections with Electric Road and Brambleton A venue, recognizing the existing and future commercial land use of these intersections. The site lies along the entrance to the Colonial A venue corridor, and the petitioner has proffered conditions addressing issues such as the building exterior appearance, access from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, lighting, signage, dumpster location and service hours, and general conformance with the site plan. The site lies at a busy intersection of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road. Any development of the property will have challenges with respect to vehicle access. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) proposes to limit the access driveway on Brambleton Avenue to rights in and out only. And the petitioner has proffered restricting right turns exiting onto Merriman Road. These measures would not solve the traffic volume concerns, but would aid in avoiding potential traffic conflicts on Brambleton A venue and cut-through traffic onto Merriman Road. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Fast Food / Drive-In Restaurants are allowed by special use permit in the C2 zoning district. Site development review by Roanoke County staff is required. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) approval is required for new driveway entrances. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - The properties owned by Seaside Heights consist of four parcels fronting on Brambleton A venue, Colonial A venue and Merriman Road. The northern parcel was originally VDOT right of way for Colonial Avenue. When the Brambleton A venue/Colonial Avenue intersection was reconstructed, a wide right of way remained on the south side of Colonial Avenue. The Commonwealth of Virginia sold this right-of-way property to Seaside Heights in 2003, with a deed restriction prohibiting driveway access from Colonial Avenue. The parcel fronting on Merriman Road was subdivided and purchased from the Lion's Club. Lester's Garage was located on one of the Brambleton Avenue parcels. TopographyNegetation - The property was graded to the current topography in 2003. The soil was stabilized with grass seed. A sediment trap remains from the grading operation. A steep slope rises on the south side of the property toward the Lion's Club. 2 8-1 Surrounding Neighborhood - Property to the north, across Colonial Avenue is zoned C2 Conditional, and contains a Kroger and CVS. Property to the east is zoned C2, and contains the Verizon office. The Lion's Club property adjoins to the south and is zoned Cl. Other property to the south which fronts on Brambleton A venue is zoned C2 and contains retail shops and a cleaners. Across Brambleton A venue to the west is the Brambleton Commons office and retail center, on property zoned C2. A vacant 4.3 acre tract lies to the northwest, across Brambleton A venue, and is zoned R3 Conditional. The Commonwealth of Virginia owns several properties along Old Cave Spring Road, that are zoned C2 and II, and contain a street maintenance storage area. A vacant C2-zoned tract lies to the north, across the signalized intersection. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - The concept plan shows the proposed Bojangles restaurant located at the northern end ofthe site. A drive through service lane begins on the south side ofthe proposed building and circles counter-clockwise around the restaurant. The service lane ends with a pick- up window on the north side of the building. A second "bypass" lane is located outside the drive- through lane. The zoning ordinance requires the vehicle stacking spaces and drive through lanes to be separated from the interior parking areas, and designed so as not to create a potentially unsafe condition where crossed by pedestrian access to the building. Six 20-foot-Iong stacking spaces, measured from the order board, are required. The drive through lane is separated from the interior parking, but the main pedestrian access crosses the drive through lane, per the concept plan. The order board would need to be shifted to the north in order to separate the required 6 stacking spaces from the pedestrian access. On the south side of the site, the petitioner plans a 6,500 square foot retail building designed to house four tenants. Parking spaces for the Boangles and retail shops are located between the two buildings and also to the west of the retail shops. Sixty parking spaces are shown on the concept plan. The retail building would require 33 parking spaces, and the remaining 27 spaces would be available for Bojangles. With 90 seats, and a staff of 10 employees on a major shift, the Bojangles restaurant would require 27 parking spaces, as well as 6 stacking spaces in the drive through lane. On the concept plan, a dumpster is shown adjacent to the east side of the retail building. Accessffraffic Circulation - Two driveway entrances are shown on the concept plan. One entrance connects from Brambleton Avenue to the southwestern comer ofthe site. This entrance is located as far as possible from the signalized intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial A venue, and beyond the start of the right turn lane for eastbound Colonial A venue. VDOT has indicated to the developer that the turning movements for this entrance would be restricted to right turns in and out only. This entrance design will be required in order to eliminate crossover traffic interfering with the left turn lane on Brambleton Ave onto Old Cave Spring Road. A second entrance would connect from Merriman Road at the existing driveway to the Lion's Club. This entrance would be rebuilt to current VDOT standards, and the Lion's Club entrance would connect to the new site entrance, and not directly to Merriman Road. The petitioner has proffered to design the Merriman Road driveway to prohibit right turns out, thus forcing exiting traffic to Colonial Avenue. No entrance is proposed from Colonial Avenue, and deed restrictions on the land prohibit driveway access from Colonial A venue. 3 8-1 2003 VDOT traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Brambleton Avenue: 23,000 vehicles per day Colonial Avenue: 7,800 vehicles per day Merriman Road: 880 vehicles per day VDOT staff required a traffic impact analysis of proposed use in relation to the adjacent streets. Consultants for the petitioner studied the proposed site development, traffic counts in the vicinity, intersection functions and vehicle turning movements on the streets as well as in and out of the proposed development. The executive summary ofthe traffic study is attached for your reference. Additional data from the study is available for your review in the Department of Community Development. The consultants found that the existing conditions at the nearby intersections show vehicle delays of 30 - 76 seconds. Projected conditions without any development on the property show increased background traffic, and associated increases in vehicle delays. With the proposed development, the greatest increase in traffic delays would be felt at the Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road intersections. At that intersection, morning peak traffic delays would increase by 51 seconds, and evening peak delay would increase by 71 seconds. Resulting level of service "F" is projected at both the Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road intersection and the Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue intersection. Please see attached "Summary Table 2" on page 2 of the Traffic Impact Study. The table shows existing and projected traffic delays at nearby intersections during the PM peak traffic, and resulting effects on the level of service. Mr. Ford, Roanoke County Traffic Engineer, has commented on the Traffic Impact Study, and is awaiting a response from the consultants. He will also be available at the Planning Commission Public Hearing to review the traffic study and answer questions from the Commission. Community Meeting - The petitioners held a community meeting on November 29,2004, at the Brambleton Center. Approximately 25 people attended the meeting. Attendance was a mix of nearby residents, interested business persons, the petitioner and their legal counsel and engineers, and county staff. Questions and discussion involved the proposed site plan, other commercial land uses on the site, building appearance and signage. Access to the development and traffic impacts were also discussed. Some residents voiced concerns about traffic impacts and access from Merriman Road. Some offered suggestions about building exterior design, monument signs, light fixture height, and dumpster service times. On July 19,2005, a second community meeting was held at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Approximately 15 residents attended the meeting. The petitioners presented a slightly revised site plan and pictures of the prototype building they wish to construct. Other design issues such as lighting, signage and landscaping were discussed. Traffic impacts from the development, as well as existing traffic concerns in the vicinity were a focus of discussion. Colonial A venue Corridor - The property lies within the Colonial A venue Corridor as defined in the 1999- 2000 Colonial Avenue Corridor Study. The study focused primarily on the residential areas along Colonial Avenue, and issues relating to conversion of residential land to commercial uses. The study also addressed the street connections with Electric Road and Brambleton Avenue, recognizing the existing and future commercial land use of these intersections. 4 8-1 The site is designated Core in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan, as well as the Colonial Avenue study. Both the Community Plan and the Colonial Avenue study recognize the properties at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue as important commercial locations where general commercial land use is anticipated and encouraged. Rather than conversion of single family homes to commercial use, this petition is for a redevelopment of two commercial properties and vacant commercial land. The site lies along the entrance to the Colonial Avenue corridor, and the planning staff and petitioner have discussed conditions addressing issues such as the building exterior appearance, access from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, lighting, signage, dumpster location and service hours, and general conformance with the site plan. Fire & RescuelUtilities - Fire and Rescue services will continue as currently provided from the Cave Spring stations. Public water is available from a 10" water line in Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. Sanitary sewer service is available through an 8" sewer line in Merriman Road and Brambleton Avenue. An 8" sewer line crosses the site and would be relocated as necessary during the site development. Stormwater would be managed with an underground system. In addition, a drainage pipe would be extended approximately 240' to convey a small water course along the western boundary. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The site is designated Core in the 2005 Roanoke County Community Plan, as well as the Colonial Avenue Corridor Study. Areas designated Core are where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses. The proposed development conforms with the policies and guidelines of the Community Plan. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The site is designated Core in the 2005 Roanoke County Community Plan, as well as the Colonial Avenue Corridor Study. Areas designated Core are where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may also be appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses. The proposed development conforms with the policies and guidelines of the Community Plan. The property lies within the Colonial Avenue Corridor as defined in the 1999- 2000 Colonial Avenue Corridor Study. The study focused primarily on the residential areas along Colonial Avenue, and issues relating to conversion of residential land to commercial uses. Rather than conversion of single family homes to commercial use, this petition is for a redevelopment of two commercial properties and vacant commercial land. The study also addressed the street connections with Electric Road and Brambleton Avenue, recognizing the existing and future commercial land use of these intersections. The site lies along the entrance to the Colonial A venue corridor, and the petitioner has proffered conditions addressing issues such as the 5 8-1 building exterior appearance, access from Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road, lighting, signage, dumpster location and service hours, and general conformance with the site plan. The site lies at a busy intersection of Brambleton A venue, Colonial A venue and Merriman Road_ Any development of the property will have challenges with respect to vehicle access. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) proposes to limit the access driveway on Brambleton Avenue to rights in and out only. And the petitioner has proffered restricting right turns exiting onto Merriman Road. These measures would not solve the traffic volume concerns, but would aid in avoiding potential traffic conflicts on Brambleton A venue and cut-through traffic onto Merriman Road. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: 32-1212004 and 33-12/2004 David Holladay PC: 7/5/05 BOS: 7/26/05 6 County of Roanoke Community Developmént Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 )ij~~:iÆkji~;iii$ Placards issued: Case Number 3~ - . .-. . . ...... . ~.. .- .." . .. .", ~. ,. .... .... , . '.", -, . Check type of application ñled (check all that apply) XJ Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver Applicants name/ address w {Zip P-.o fa" ( L- Lei '> -r fÅo"-, 5 ¿ 11-- 0 ~~ne: :)9 to (;.phÝ\->..a",- ¡¿J Work: Sea side He i gh t s, LLC 1<.::> v.A 6? r-rAn::.&--.... [cJv¡ard- A N;"ll, [ c:<-v.-./.Cc:- ;Z<--(O{' Cell #: ~ . sq. r) Fax No.: Owner's name/address wlzi l' ( 2. 5 b-a- ~ -rt-... ~ (2...J Seaside Heights, LL.C G-t'<-t:n" e-rJ ~""7 /.'11 Ò aNTACT: -&..Jwö rQ A. t J.a t t , Esq . ~o 37 .., ~ C, Reðnoke, vA 1Q018 8-1 0'-( ....... ",_." ; o Administrative Appeal :J ) 7 - ,{, I ?f?( 546 725 818i) 5~ 77'1 0951 Phone #: 5""57 - b ( '7'7' Work: 540 725-81-80 Fax No. #:SJt<T- ,7'1-u-961 Property Location Intersection of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road Magisterial District: Cave Spr i ng Community Planning area: Cave Spr i ng Tax Ma.p No.:f086,.08-03-36.01 and l..- í,.'J ) portron 0 080.08-03-35.01 (, À...t?') Existing Zoning: C-1 Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~ Existing Land Use: Vacant ijjj¡~ì#i~~;.§'k~_Ç.1A+ [J$~ tßt01f1~:'Ïf:~J!¡.M~~{qiit~:é#l§/Ji). ...::: " _.,.: ....-._. " ._.~ ~-'''''-'''- ~_._~-,..-... -- -............,.,-.,- ~.....~. Proposed Zoning: C- 2 Proposed Land Use: fast food restaurant w/drive-thru& 6600 sq ft retail space the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ ® L··-·'~~~:,~5:::~~:..~1.iŸ~R ~'@Miilt.~i~~1fiilj?iij/JR.É~i~~ifim;~i;:~~~:..·.~.;-, .!:.~~~'....:-:_ "_'-H';';~'~'_~'~~~;" VariancerWaiver of Section(s) No ........,'.......- of the Roanoke County Zonmg Ordinance in order to: . _J.:..-"....',.-....:~-.:;_.. Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appe.al of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSWG OR INCOMPLETE. RJSfW V/AA RJSfW V/AA RJSIW V/AA m Consultation X 81/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner~~ wnï:.C¿gent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and' consent of the owner. ' Owner's Signature 8-1 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Applicant SEASIDE HEIGHTS, LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general wefar~. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the C-2 District is to provide for a variety of commercial and service-related activities within the urban service area serving the community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the County. These commercial districts are generally found along maj, , . " i II thoroughfares which serve large segments of the County population. The use as a mixed retail ancj res~aurant meets these criterions and those uses are specifically permitted within the County's Zoning Ordinance and within the County Comprehensive Plan. Retail uses are specifically allowed by right and the restaurant, drive-in and fast food is allowed with a Special Use Permit. A significant portion of the subject property is already zoned C-2 and, thus, the rezoning effort is a small extension of the existing Zoning District. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The subject property is designated as "transition" within the County's Land Use Plan. The "transition" category recognizes that certain roadways have the potential of becoming primary corridors where strip development pressures exist. Certainly this is true with the subject property with the adjoining uses on Brambleton Avenue. The guidelines for "transition" promote planned development nodes and major road junctions in redevelopment of existing strip developments. The former uses on the subject property have been eliminated and, with the appropriate grading plan, the proposed use as retail and restaurant, fast food with a drive-thru, subject to a Special Use Permit, are appropriate in this area. All of the adjoining properties along Brambleton are similar retail uses. Thus, the proposed use meets the objective of the "transition district" which is to provide for development along design£.,' ":," 'oad corridors in the County. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed development will have no negative impact upon public services and facilities. The property is already zoned Commercial, a portion being C-1 and a portion being C-2. The rezoning from C-1 to C-2 will allow for the appropriate development of a significant portion of the property with one owner, thereby assuring limited access and a well-designed and coordinated plan of development. F:\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Seaside Heights JUSTI FICA TION.doc 8-1 L"- IT ! '" ~ ~ " ~ c.-:..::.".:'~ A... A!I:-U ~ Zoning _AG3 ~ _EP _AG1 AR ~ _AV Ct _C2 _ C2CVOD It ã;i 12 ~ _PCO PRO .PTD ~ R1 R2 R3 '~ R4 ~ ( ../r., N Roanoke County A Department of Community Development 5 JJJl Ii Applicants Name: Seaside Heights, LLC Existing Zoning: C-1 Proposed Zoning: C-2S Tax Map Number: 86.08-3-36.1 Portion of 86. 08-3-35.1 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.98 acres October 25, 2004 No Scale 8-1 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Application fee: ¿'). ÐD Placards issued: BOS date: Check type of application filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning IXSpecial Use 0 Variance [J Waiver R,;ß L-LL-- {'-f~ e¡ "-(7'-" 6 Q Applicants name/addr wYzip 51 G ~ Ú¡ (t~ Phone: r) 7 - 1,'1 SEASIDE HEIOffS, LLC ¡¿.oP'tAA-o~7VA ::1-<.-('::'>(? Work: S4A 111\-R1RO aNfACT: Edw.,;Ird A. 14,;0 II. ~=i. ( Cell #: 3114:9 a IGlI 'Ell I Ell DI., Su i l-\l 21H) C, R.\.,~·Ü.òlœ, -.. "JItO lAx No.: ..,UII , 7 (I U9& 1 Owner's name/address w/~ 9 1:2..3 G-C<-l-H-.J>~ 12-rJ Phone #: S] 7 - G/ 'l~ SEASIDE HEIOffS LLC G-ú-/(t.. enl:h".n; /M Ò Work: 540-.,.,23 U-80 , f ( aNfACT: [dV/al d A. tlstt. ~<:q ~Of?7 '7 Fax No. #: ~tI 77'[ ø!Mr 3-1 Sull.e-.2-Q.{ C,RVQIIURt!, -fA 2"'19H3 Property Location o Colonial Avenue 4510 Brambleton Avenue o Administrative Appeal Magisterial District: Cave Spr i ng Community Planning area: Cave Spr i ng Existing Zoning: C- 2 Proposed Zoning: C- 2 Proposed Land Use: fast food restaurant w/drive-thru Does t~rCel meet the minimum Jot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yesý' No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. /'" Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yespr No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes IJ No IJ Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SIW V / AA RISIW V / AA RIS/W V / AA m Consultation § 8 1/2" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicabJe Justification Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the pr e r th owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. SEAS I BY. Owner's Signature 2 8-1 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Applicant SEASIDE HEIGHTS, LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the C-2 District is to provide for a variety of commercial and service-related activities within the urban service area serving the community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the County. These commercial districts are generally found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the County population. The use as a mixed retail and restaurant meets these criterions and those uses are specifically permitted within the County's Zoning Ordinance and within the County Comprehensive Plan. Retail uses are specifically allowed by right and the restaurant, drive-in and fast food is allowed with a Special Use Permit. A significant portion of the subject property is already zoned C-2 and, thus, the rezoning effort is a small extension of the existing Zoning District. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The subject property is designated as "transition" within the County's Land Use Plan. The "transition" category recognizes that certain roadways have the potential of becoming primary corridors where strip development pressures exist. Certainly this is true with the subject property with the adjoining uses on Brambleton Avenue. The guidelines for "transition" promote planned development nodes and major road junctions in redevelopment of existing strip developments. The former uses on the subject property have been eliminated and, with the appropriate grading plan, the proposed use as retail and restaurant, fast food with a drive-thru, subject to a Special Use Permit, are appropriate in this area. All of the adjoining properties along Brambleton are similar retail uses. Thus, the proposed use meets the objective of the "transition district" which is to provide for development along designated key road corridors in the County. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed development will have no negative impact upon public services and facilities. The property is already zoned Commercial, a portion being C-1 and a portion being C-2. The rezoning from C-1 to C-2 will allow for the appropriate development of a significant portion of the property with one owner, thereby assuring limited access and a well-designed and coordinated plan of development. \\JOLL Y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Seaside Heights JUSTIFICA TION.doc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-.... (~ Zoning 8-1 IT ~ ~ " !1 o ~ ~ Cr-0.:."..1' A... ¡::j1!jo'!.T _AG3 _EP _AGI AR _AV C! _C2 _ C2CVOO 11 0, _12 - !~ .PCO PRO .PTD R1 R2 R3 R4 Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Á Applicants Name: Seaside Heights, LLC Existing Zoning: C-1/C-2 Proposed Zoning: C·2S Tax Map Number: 86.08-3-34 86.08-3-35 86.08-3-35.1 86.08-3-36.1 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 2.22 Acres October 25, 2004 No Scale 8-1 ~, SCHEDULE "A" PARCEL I: BEGINNING AT AN OLD IRON PIN AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF COLONIAL AVENUE AND MERRIMAN ROAD; THENCE WITH THE WEST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD S. 4° 49' 00" W. 104.63 FEET TO A RAILROAD SPIKE' THENCE WITII A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 1HAT HAS AN ARC DISTANCE OF 126.81 FEET, A RADIUS OF 681. 20 FEET;AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF S. 10° 08' 58" W. 126.62 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE WEST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD; THENCE LEAVING SAID ROAD AND WITH A NEW LINE N. 70° 58' 35" W. 147.56 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY OF THE LIONS CLUB OF CAVE SPRlNG DISTRlCT, INC. PROPERTY; THENCE WITH THE SAME N. 24° 43' 16" E. 6.53 FEET TO AN OLD PIPE; THENCE N. 24° 43' 16" E. 6.53 FEET TO AN OLD PIPE; THENCE N. 24 DEGREES 54' 13" E. 120·.91 FEET TO AN OLD IRON PIN; THENCE S. 77° 35' 26" W. 66.70 FEET TO AN OLD IRON PIN; THENCE N. 3°51' 34" W. 69.40 FEET TO AN OLD IRON PIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COLONIAL AVENUE; THENCE WITH TIlE SAME N. 89° 42' 26" E. 22.26 FEET TO AN OLD IRON PIN; THENCE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT THAT HAS AN ARC DISTANCE OF 164.91 FEET, A RADIUS OF 1,457.39 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARlNG AND DISTANCE OF N. 86° 27' 31" E. 164.82 FEET TO TIIE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.689 ACRES AND BEING KNOWN AS LOT I, PLAT OF SUBDMSION MADE FOR LIONS CLUB OF CAVE SPRING DISTRICT, INC., ,BY DAVID A. BESS, L.S_, DATED FEBRUARY 16,2001, AND RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 24, PAGE 63, IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT'S OFFICE. PARCEL n BEGINNING AT CORNER NO.1, A STAKE 6 FEET NORTHERLY FROM A MARKED 30" ASH TREE, SAID BEGINNmG POINT BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY OUTSIDE BOUNDARY LINE CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN 97 Y.t ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO S. H. C. GREENWOOD BY DEED OF RECORD IN DEED BOOK "F" PAGE 690, ALL REFERENCES HEREIN BEING TO THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE; THENCE LEAVING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BEGINNING POINT, AND WITH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID ORIGINAL GREENWOOD TRACT, NORTH 12 DEGREES 10' WEST, 119 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS CORNER NO.2, WIllCR IS A POINT, IN THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. RIGHW A Y NO. 221, AND STATE SECONDARY ROUTE ___ NO. 687; THENCE LEAVING THE INTERSECTION OF SAID ROADS, AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STATE SECONDARY ROUTE 687 (KNOWN 8-1 ALSO AS THE POOR HOUSE ROAD), SOUTH 88° 41' EAST, PASSING THROUGH THE CENTER OF A BRIDGE OVER A BRANCH AT 111.3 FEET, IN ALL A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 127.3 FEET TO POINT DESIGNATED AS CORNER NO.3, THENCE LEAVING THE CENTER OF SAID STATE SECONDARY ROUTE 687, AND WITH A NEW DIVISION LINE THROUGH THE PROPERTY OF A. P. GREENWOOD. SOlITH 0 DEGREES 34' WEST, PASSING BY THE WESTERLY SIDE OF A. E. P_ CO'S. ELECTRIC POLE AT 12 FEET AND PASSING BY THE WESTERLY SIDE OF AN APPLE TREE AT 35 FEET, IN ALL A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 95.6 FEET TO A STAKE AT CORNER NO.4; THENCE WIlli THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY OF J. L. HOBACK, PURCHASED FROM H. H. BOWLING, SOUfH 79 DEGREES 53' WEST, CROSSING THE CENTER OF A BRANCH AT 68.8 FEET, IN ALL A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 102.3 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINJNG 0.29 ACRE, AND BEING THE EXTREME SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION, OR CORNER OF THE 11.58 ÂCRE TRACT CONVEYED TO A. P. GREENWOOD BY H. W. GREENWOOD AND WIFE, BY DEED DATED NOVBMBER 3, 1928, AND RECORDED NOVEMBER 8, 1928, IN DEED BOOK 181,PAGE297. PARCELID BEGINNING AT AN OLD IRON PIPE BEING CORNER NO.1 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ORIGINAL CA VB SPRING BAPTIST CHUJiCH LOT; THENCE ALONG WESTERLY BOUNDARY LJNE OF THE SAID CA VB SPRING BAPTIST CHURCH PROPERTY S. 26° 45' W. 115 FT. TO AN OLD IRON PIPE AT CORNER NO.2; THENCE S. 26° 10' W. 107.59 FT. TO AN IRON ON LINE OF PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY SOLD TO BLAIR PITZER, ET UX; THENCE WITH LINE OF SAID LOT N. 59° 19' W. 171.47 FT. TO ANOTHER IRON, ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 221; THENCE WITII SAME N. 26° 49' E.70 FT. TO A POINT; THENCE CONTINUING N. 34° 23' 30" E. 80.91 FT. TO A POINT. CORNER TO LAND NOW OWNED BY R. A. LESTER; THENCE WITH TH.E LESTER LINE S. 12° 10' E. 47.00 FT. TO A POINT, A CORNER; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE LINE OF LESTER, ET AL, N. 79° 53' E. 162.0 FT. TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; AND CONTAINING 0.623 ACRES AS SHOWN ON A MAP PREPARED BY T.P. PARKER, DATED OCTÖBER 18,1974, AND OF RECORD IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, IN DEED BOOK 1035, PAGE 694 PARCEL IV BEING AS SHOWN oN SHEET 1 OF 1 OF THE PLAT ENTITLED "PRELIMINARY RECORD PLAT SHO\VmG RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION AT THE __ INTERBECTION OF COLONIAL A VBN1Æ (RT. 687) AND BRAMBLETON AVENUE (RT. 221), PREPARED FOR SEASIDE HEIGHTS, LLC SITIJATED IN ¡. -- 8-1 THE CAVE SPRlNG MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VŒ.GINIA" DATED JUNE 11, 2002, PREPARED BY LUNSDEN ASSOCIATES, P .C., ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS, ROANOKE, VŒ.GINIA, WITH THE· POINT OF BEGINNING LYING AT tHE CORNER FORMED BY THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RT. 221 (BRAMBLETON A VENUE) AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RT. 687' (COLONIAL AVENUE) THENCE, ALONG THE FOLLOWING COURSES: ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIDS OF 591.25 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 158.11 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S. 62°53 '02''E AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 157.64 FEET; THENCE, SI4°39'39"E. 26.04 FEET; THENCE, S04°01 '45"W. 40.69 FEET; THENCE, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1457.39 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 164.90 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF S85°40'16"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 164,82 FEET; THENCE S89°02'06" W, 96.26 FEET; THENCE, N31°56'45"E. 159.67 FEET; THENCE, N63°11 '03"E, 35.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 0.58 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. -- 3i'IN.Þ,v 1...rNO~ ---- - - 1911.lL1f - ~ to') - ~ .. ~ ~;:; ~;; ~ : \2 ~ .,~,¡ OJ- I¡¡ ~ _~Q! ~ ~ I i)¡ .., -.J Ij!l:lg<c""'; O\~ -.J ~,,~ ,,<I:: i,¡'¡ )........ ... ~ 'O(~ ~ frJ : ::.:~ . ~ ~ H~ ü ~ q!æ . ";¡ C) i eè L", ! 1;1;: ~ iìi CI::: " ~ ''Ii! ':; ~ (j'; ~ Cl ~~ ~¡'¡. ;. ~ ~ ~ ¡ . u .J .. U \ \ \ \ \ , \ ' ~ ¡.._n_ ! n I lL. .~ 0 I I '\ ~ .~..~._..~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I J - - - - - - - --- 8-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 ORDINANCE TO REZONE .98 ACRES FROM C1, OFFICE DISTRICT, TO C2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON 2.22 ACRES FOR THE OPERATION OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND DRIVE-THRU LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE, COLONIAL AVENUE, AND MERRIMAN ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE PETITION OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS LLC (BOJANGLES) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 21 , 2004, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23,2005; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 16, 2005; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .98 acres, as described herein, and located at the intersections of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue, and Merriman Road (Part of Tax Map No. 86.08-3-35.1 and all of 86.08-3-36.1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C1 , Office District, to the zoning classification of C2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Seaside Heights, LLC. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The development of the property shall substantially conform with the site plan entitled "Site Layout and Grading Plan for RoBo, LLC," dated July 28, 2005, attached as Exhibit A, with driveway access only from Brambleton Avenue and 1 8-1 Merriman Road, subject to those changes required by Roanoke County during its comprehensive site plan review. (2) The exterior of the fast food restaurant to be constructed on the Property shall substantially conform to the photographs attached as Exhibit B. (3) All building exterior walls shall be brick from grad to eave. (4) The Merriman Road driveway shall be designed to prohibit right turns onto Merriman Road. (5) Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. (6) Any freestanding sign shall be a monument type not to exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width, and shall have brick construction to match the buildings. (7) The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. (8) The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. (9) Dumpsters shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (10) Portions of the front yards along the Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road rights-of-way designated on the concept plan for landscaping shall remain as open green spaces, and landscaped with any combination of flower, shrubs, ground cover or trees. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Part of Tax MaD No. 86.08-3-35.1 - .298 acres Being as shown on Sheet 1 of 1 of the plat entitled "Preliminary Record Plat Showing Right-of-Way Vacation at the intersection of Colonial Avenue (Rt. 687) and Brambleton Avenue (Rt. 221), prepared for Seaside Heights, LLC situated in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" dated June 11,2002, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., with the point of beginning lying at the corner formed by the intersection of the east right-of-way line of Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) and the south right-of-way line of Route 687 (Colonial Avenue); thence, along the following courses: along a curve to the left, having a radius of 591.25 feet, an arc length of 158.11 feet, a chord bearing of S. 62053' 02" E. and a chord length of 157.64 feet; thence, S. 140 39' 39" E. 26.04 feet; thence, S. 040 01' 45" W. 40.69 feet; thence, along a curve to the right, having a radius of 1457.39 feet, an arc length of 164.90 feet, a chord bearing of S. 85040' 16" W. and 2 8-1 a chord length of 164.82 feet; thence, S. 89° 02' 06" W. 96.26 feet; thence, N. 31° 56' 45" E. 159.67 feet; thence, N. 63° 11' 03" E. 35.93 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.58 acre, more or less. All of Tax MaD No. 86.08-3-36.1 - .68 acres Beginning at an old iron pin at the southwest intersection of Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road; thence, with the west side of Merriman Road S. 4° 49' 00" W. 104.63 feet to a railroad spike; thence, with a curve to the right that has an arc distance of 126.81 feet, a radius of 681.20 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of S. 10° 08' 58" W. 126.62 feet to an iron pin set on the west side of Merriman Road; thence, leaving said road and with a new line N. 70° 58' 35" W. 147.56 feet to an iron pin set on the outside boundary of the Lions Club of Cave Spring District, Inc. property; thence with the same N. 24° 43' 16" E. 6.53 feet to an old pipe; thence, N. 24° 54' 13" E. 120.91 feet to an old iron pin; thence, S. 77° 35' 26" W. 66.70 feet to an old iron pin; thence, N. 3° 51' 34" W. 69.40 feet to an old iron pin on the south side of Colonial Avenue; thence, with the same N. 89° 42' 26" E. 22.26 feet to an iron pin; thence with a curve to the left that has an arc distance of 164.91 feet, a radius of 1,457 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of N. 86° 27' 31" E. 164.82 feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.689 acres and being known as Lot 1, Plat of Subdivision made for Lions Club of Cave Spring District, Inc. by David A. Bess, L.S., dated February 16, 2001, and recorded in Plat Book 24 at page 63 in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 5. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Seaside Heights, LLC to operate a fast food restaurant and drive-thru to be located on 2.22 acres at the intersections of Brambleton Avenue, Colonial Avenue, and Merriman Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is hereby approved. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 8-1 PRELIMINARY Traffic Impact Study Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue Roanoke, Virginia ,~- Prepared for: Caldwell White Associates Roanoke, VA May 04, 2005 ,O,{\ Anderson & Associates, Inc. ,YAU Blacksburg, VA 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Table of Contents Executive Summary ........... ................................. ....... ................................ 2 Analysis of Pre-Development Conditions...... ................... ....................... 4 Analysis of Buildout Conditions ............................................................... 7 Conclusions and Recommendations .....................................................11 Tables.. ........ ...." ..." .... ..." ...".." .... ..... "11" ..... ...". II' ..11...." .... '...1. 1'1 ..... II II II II II" .... ... 12 Figures ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A... ... II I..... I'" ..... ..... .... .... ..... ........ ..........1. ........... ....1.... .... """'" ... ...... 14 Appendix B... .....".1" ........" ..." .... .... II II .... ... ......1" ..." ......." ..." II" ... ....." ... .... .... ...." 15 Appendix C ".... ...." "" ........ ... ..... ... .... .......... ... .... .... .... .... ............ ....... ........ .... 16 Appendix D . ..... ... ..... .... ... ..... ............ ............ ........ ............." II............. ... ........ 17 ,--. Ii£. Anderson & Associates, Inc. 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County. Virqinia Executive Summary Overview This report was prepared by Anderson & Associates, Inc. (A&A) for Caldwell White Associates to evaluate the possible traffic impacts which may result from the construction of a Bojangles' Restaurant with a drive through window and retail shopping area located in the Old Cave Springs area of Roanoke County, Virginia. The proposed site is specifically located at the southeast comer of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. This study is based on a proposed site plan for the development prepared by Caldwell Whìte Associates, for RoBo, LLC and has an anticipated buildout of 2006. Existing access to the site is located at the comer of Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road, one block east of Brambleton Avenue. There are two proposed entrances to the site located on Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road. Discussion Based on traffic counts collected by A&A and site traffic provided by the developer, analyses were perfonned to determine the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent roadways and intersections. The site traffic used in the analyses were based on actual counts taken from four local Bojangles' Restaurants and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Yearly traffic growth was determined to be 3.16% per year, based on a growth trend established by using Historical Average Daily Traffic (ADT) obtained by VDOT from 1995 and 2003. Based on a review of traffic volumes, it was detennined that PM Peak Hour traffic results in the highest traffic volumes for the intersections. Summary Table 1 shows PM analysis results based on the above traffic: ....UltI;I=F.'riI ;(.1,..11111.. m ¡ 1_ Summa Table 1* 2005 Existing Traffic 2006 Buildout Traffic Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road 20.8 C 22.9 C 33.6 D Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue 50.9 D 55.6 E 60.4 E Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill 34.8 C 38.5 D 41.1 D In comparing traffic counts collected by A&A with VDOT count information, it was discovered that the VDOT counts grown by the 3.16% historical growth factor were approximately 15% higher than the counts collected by A&A The difference in volumes was discussed with VDOT and while not normally done, it was decided that the counts collected by A&A should be increased to coincide with the 2005 volumes as projected by the historical growth information. It was also determined that site volumes provided by the developer were lower than site trips generated using ITE. Therefore, the PM analysis was also performed using this information and corresponding results are shown in Summary Table 2: . . - II. :.. II. : Intersection LOS Deja LOS Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road D 105.7 F '-..- Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue E 93.8 F Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill D 62.3 E Conclusions Results depicted in Summary Table 1 show that increase in delays due to the proposed development range from 2.6 seconds at the Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive intersection to 10.7 seconds at the unsignalized intersection of Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road. The increases in the delay times are minimal compared to the delays existing and anticipated background delays already being experienced at these intersections. At the signalized intersections of Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive, the background traffic is providing a Level of Service (LOS) below C. Since these intersections are part of a coordinated system that was not in the scope of this study, the LOS for these intersections could not be accurately determined. We anticipate that the effects of platooning from the coordinated system will decrease the delays at these intersections. The increases in delays due to the proposed development are minimal at these intersections and should not have an adverse effect on the overall LOS. 2006 Background Traffic volumes show that a dual- left turn lane from Colonial Avenue onto southbound Brambleton Avenue is desirable. However, based on the existing topography, roadway alignment, and existing development adjacent to the intersection, it may not be feasible. VDOTs Land Development Guidelines does not specify a minimum level of service at unsignalized intersections. MUTCD signal warrants were checked for the Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road intersection and it was determined that no warrants for a signal were met. The minor roadway approach at his intersection will experience an increase in the delay of less 11 seconds, therefore no changes to the intersection are recommended. Results from Summary Table 2 show a minimal increase in the overall delays due to the proposed development at the signalized intersections of Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive. As stated above, these intersections are part of a coordinated system that was not in the scope of this study, therefore the levels of service for these intersections could not be accurately determined. We anticipate that the effects of platooning from the coordinated system will decrease the delays at these intersections. The increases in the delays due to the proposed development are minimal at these intersections and should not have an adverse effect on the overall LOS. The additional traffic due to the 15% increase in the counts recommended by VDOT and the use of the higher ITE trip generation instead of the counts taken at local Bojangles' Restaurants, increases the volume of traffic going through the Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road intersection. The result in this increase in delay along Merriman Road is slightly greater than one minute. :Result. shown are based on Synchro Analy.i. for the signalized ¡nteroeclion. 01 Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue and Bramblelon Avenue & Pleasanl Hill Dri..... Results for ColonIal Avenue & Merriman Road are based on HCS Unsignalized Analysis. "'--. 4\ -Anderson 8. Associat~s, I-~c: - Page 2 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Introduction This report was prepared by Anderson & Associates, Inc. (A&A) for Caldwell White Associates to evaluate the possible traffic impacts that may result from the construction of a fast food restaurant and retail shopping area. This study was performed in accordance with the Land Development Guidelines (Virginia Department of Transportation, 1995) and the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000 edition). Site Description The site to be developed is a parcel of land in the Old Cave Springs area of Roanoke County, Virginia and is specifically located at the southeast corner of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. The property is adjacent to Brambleton Avenue on the west, Colonial Avenue on the north, and Merriman Road on the east, as shown in Figure 1: Site Location Map. The anticipated buildout for the development is 2006 ("Design Year"). Currently the land is undeveloped. This study is based on the Site Plan for the development prepared by Caldwell White Associates, for RoBo, LLC. Existing access to the site is located at the corner of Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road, one block east of Brambleton Avenue. This study assumes that the proposed development will consist of a 6,515 fe retail shopping area and a 3,839 ff restaurant facility with a drive through window. Proposed access to the site will be at the following locations and can be seen in Figure 2: Site Layout: 1. Brambleton Avenue south of the Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Intersection. 2. Merriman Road south of the Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road Intersection. Adjacent to the site, Colonial Avenue is a four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction with an additional left turn lane at the Brambleton-Colonial Intersection) and a posted speed limit of 25-mph. Brambleton Avenue is a five-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction and a center turn lane) with a 45-mph posted speed limit. Merriman Road is a two-lane road with an additional left turn lane at the Colonial Avenue intersection. Traffic generators in the area include a variety of land use types such as single-family residential, multi-family residential, general commercial, and schools. Based on discussions between Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Caldwell White Associates, and A&A, it was -. agreed for the following intersections to be included as part of the traffic study: Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue, '. Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road, and Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive. It is our understanding from conversations with VDOT during preparation of this report that the signalized intersections at Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive are part of a coordinated signal system, which consists of multiple signals along Brambleton Avenue. The intersection of Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road is presently unsignalized with the minor approaches being stop controlled. See Figure 3: Existing Lane Configuration. Analysis MethodoloClV Recommendations for improvements are based on requirements outlined in the following resources: · Acceptable traffic performance is LOS ·C" for signalized intersections as well as each lane group as defined in the VDOT Land Development Guidelines (1995). The VDOT Land Development Guidelines do not define an Acceptable traffic LOS for unsignalized intersections. · Turn Lane Warrants are based on the VDOT Road Design Manual (2001). · Signal Warrants, if required, are based on the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Millennium Edition. · Capacity analysis was performed using Highway Capacity Software 2000, version 4.1e (HCS)_ HCS is a product of the McTrans Center, University of Florida, and is based on principles of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000 edition). The Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection modules were used for analysis of signalized and unsignalized intersections. Please see Table 2 and Table 3 for Intersection LOS. · Signalized Intersection Analysis was also performed using Synchro 5 Traffic Signal Coordination Software (Synchro). Synchro is a product of Trafficware Corporation of Albany, California. Please see Table 3 for a comparison of HCS and Synchro analysis results. · Both Highway Capacity Software 2000, version 4.1 e (HCS) and Synchro 5 Traffic Signal Coordination Software (Synchro) were used for traffic analysis performed and included in this report. Even though HCS is the software recogniced by FHWA, in our opinion Synchro is better suited for analyzing signalized intersections and specifically gives a more accurate representation of the delays occurring at the analyzed intersections in this study. HCS is incapable of handling calculations for optimizing green times, the number of cars turning right on red, coordinated system analysis, and determining queue lengths. Synchro has the ability to optimize effected green times, analyze actuated signals, calculate vehicles turning right on red, determine estimated queue lengths, and optimize coordinated signal timings and \__ signal offsets. J'£. Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Analysis of Pre-Development Conditions The VDOT Land Development Guidelines require analysis of Existing Year and Design Year traffic conditions to determine the scope of improvements warranted by future traffic alone. without considering the impact of additional site traffic. Analysis of 2005 Existing Conditions is addressed in this section. The analysis results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Development of Traffic Conditions without Development Continuous 48-hour tube counts were performed on Brambfeton Avenue and Colonial Avenue from February 1, 2005 through February 3, 2005. To our knowledge the counts obtained are representative of typical traffic conditions in the area and there were no extenuating circumstances that would affect traffic during this time period. Manual turning movement counts were collected at the intersections of Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive on Tuesday, February 2, 2005 from 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM. Due to equipment malfunction, turning movement counts for Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road were collected on February 8,2005. To our knowledge these counts are representative of a typical day of traffic conditions in the area and there were no other extenuating circumstances that would affect traffic during this time period. Existing 2005 AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes for the intersections are shown in Figures 4 through 9. Historical Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for 1995 and 2003 were obtained from VDOT for Brambleton Avenue near the proposed site location. A growth factor of 3.16% per year was determined by calculating the percent difference per year between the 1995 and 2003 ADT volumes and is shown graphically in Figure 16. The counts obtained by A&A in February of 2005 were grown by 3.16% per year to estimate traffic volumes for the Design Year 2006. Design Year AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes for the intersections are shown in Figures 17 through 22. A comparison of the traffic counts collected in 2005 was performed by applying the growth factor of 3.16% per year to the - VDOT 2003 ADT volumes to obtain projected VDOT 2005 ADT volumes. The comparison showed that the projected VDOT '- ADT counts were 15% higher than the counts collected by A&A. The difference in volumes was discussed with VDOT and it was recommended by VDOT that an analysis be performed using traffic volumes that coincide with the 2005 ADT volumes. Existing 2005 AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes (increased by 15%) for the intersections are shown in Figures 10 through 15. Based on this recommendation, the traffic volumes were increased by an additional 3.16% to provide Design Year 2006 AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes with the 15% increase. These volumes are shown in Figures 23 through 28. To provide a thorough analysis and per VDOT recommendation the data was increased by 15% and analysis performed on the above listed intersections. Results show a significant difference in LOS and delay between the two sets of data. Brambleton Avenue Capacity Analvsis Analysis can not be performed on Brambleton Avenue as a multi-lane highway since the posted speed limit is 45 mph and will result in a free flow speed of less than 45 mph. This speed is outside the scope of the Highway Capacity Manual's methodology for Multi-Lane Highways; therefore, recommendations and capacity analysis for Brambleton Avenue are based on intersection analyses. "- i/&l Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 of 17 5104105 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Intersection Analysis The table below summarizes overall delay and LOS results based on Synchro analysis: AM PM D F Based on VDOT Land Development Guidelines, a LOS C or better is acceptable for each approach lane group as well as overall intersection LOS. In reviewing the results summarized above, this intersection is presently functioning at levels that exceed the desirable capacity of the intersection. Methods by which LOS can be improved include the addition of through lanes as well as turn lanes, optimization of signal timings, and coordination of multiple signals. VDOT recommends that dual left turn lanes be considered when hourly left-turn volumes exceed 300 vehicles per hour (vph). It also states that dual left turn lanes are desirable where left-turn movements exceed 350 vph. Based on these criteria, the peak hourly volume for -left-turn movements of traffic turning from WB Colonial Avenue to SB Brambleton Avenue exceeds the amount recommended for a single left turn lane. However, based on the existing topography, roadway alignment, and existing development adjacent to the intersection, it may not be feasible to provide additional lanes as a means of improving LOS. This recommendation is based on traffic volumes without additional site trips from the proposed development. It is our understanding from conversations with VDOT during preparation of this report that the signal at this intersection is one of several traffic signals along Brambleton Avenue that are part of a coordinated system. It is further our understanding - that the signals included in this coordinated system are located to both the north and south of this intersection. The coordinated system is designed to platoon vehicles along Brambleton Avenue to decrease the delay time at each " intersection. In order to obtain a more precise LOS for this intersection. it would be necessary to perform an analysis of thè entire system; however this is outside the scope of this study. Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive Intersection Analysis The table below summarizes overall delay and LOS results based on Synchro analysis: AM PM C E Based on VDOT Land Development Guidelines, a LOS C or better is acceptable for each approach lane group as well as overall intersection LOS. In reviewing the results summarized above, this intersection is presently functioning at levels, which exceed the desirable capacity of the intersection. Methods by which LOS can be improved include the addition of through lanes as well as turn lanes, optimization of signal timings, and coordination of multiple signals. In reviewing the existing topography, roadway alignment, and existing development adjacent to the intersection, it may not be feasible to provide additional lanes as a mean of improving LOS. It is our understanding from conversations with VDOT that this signal is one of several traffic signals along Brambleton Avenue that are part of a coordinated system. It is further our understanding that the signals included in this coordinated system are located to both the north and south of this intersection. The coordinated system is designed to platoon vehicles 310ng Brambleton Avenue to decrease the delay time at each intersection. In order to obtain a more precise LOS for this '--- /Jij, Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 5 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia intersection, it would be necessary to perform an analysis of the entire system; however this is outside the scope of this 5tudy. Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road Intersection Analvsis The table below summarizes maximum delay and LOS results based on HCS Unsignalized analysis: AM PM D D VDOT Land Development Guidelines do not provide an acceptable LOS for an unsignalized intersection. The LOS results summarized are a result of significant through movement volumes on the major approach (Colonial Avenue) and the inability of traffic to make left-turn movements from the minor approaches. Based on analysis results, AM delays are controlled by the northbound approach, while PM delays are controlled by the southbound approach. Queue lengths from analysis of the Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue intersection show that the intersection generates queues in the Existing Year (2005) that extend past the Colonial Avenue & Merriman intersection. This was also observed while obtaining traffic counts for the intersection. This will cause delays that will be higher than those given by the HCS analysis. VDOT's Land Development guidelines does not specify a minimum LOS at unsignalized intersections. A review of MUTCD signalization warrants does not necessitate a need for signalization. In reviewing the close proximity of this intersection with the intersection at Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue, spacing is less that the minimum recommended by MUTCD. The only way in which a signalized intersection could properly function would be to provide a signal coordinated - with the system along Brambleton Avenue. This would minimize queues on Colonial Avenue between Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road as well as allow the minor approaches to make left-turn movements. In order to obtain a more precise '- LOS for this intersection, it would be necessary to perform a signalized íntersection analysis for this intersection along with the existing coordinated system; however, this is outside the scope of this study. '- i£ Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 6 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Analysis of Buildout Conditions Based on the VDOT Land Development Guidelines. analysis of Buildout traffic conditions may be used to determine what specific improvements the additional site traffic warrants on the local roads above and beyond the improvements necessary to accommodate the projected background traffic. The developer shall only be responsible for any improvements to the intersection that are required due to the proposed generated traffic from the site as stated in the VDOT Land Development Guidelines. This would not include additional improvements required to bring the Design Year (2006) Background Traffic to a LOS C or better. Analysis of Buildout Conditions is addressed in this section and the analysis results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Development of Site Generated Traffic The Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. provided traffic volumes for the proposed restaurant based on actual cash register receipts generated at four nearby Bojangles' restaurants. A copy of the traffic volumes is included in Appendix D. Traffic volumes anticipated by the Colonial Avenue Site Development were also generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (Seventh Edition) and are shown in Table 1. Below are Trip Generation Assumptions used in obtain site traffic volumes: Trip Generation Assumptions: · ITE Land Use Type 820 (Shopping Center) was used for the proposed 6,515 fe retail shop. · ITE Land Use Type 934 (Fast Food Restaurant with a Drive through window) was used for the proposed 3,839 fe Restaurant. A comparison of actual counts from Bojangles' to trips generated by ITE for the proposed restaurant shows that the traffic ~ generated by the Trip Generation Manual were on average 80% higher than actual traffic volumes for the proposed _. restaurant. The comparison also shows that the PM peak restaurant traffic does not occur at the same time as the adjacent roadway peak hour. Based on this comparison, we have performed analysis for Buildout conditions using both of the following criteria: · Actual restaurant volumes for the highest AM and PM hours and traffic generated using ITE Land Use Type 820. · Traffic generated by ITE Land Use Type 934 and ITE Land Use Type 820. Traffic Assianment to Adjacent Roadways The distribution of traffic entering and exiting the site was based on the percentage of vehicles approaching and departing the area from each direction. The percentages and site-generated volumes are shown in Figures 29 through 40. Based on the two proposed site access locations and the amount of traffic entering the site from each direction, the following was assumed for analysis purposes: · Access to the site from Brambleton Avenue was analyzed as a right-in right-out intersection. · All other site traffic including vehicles traveling southbound on Brambleton Avenue will access and exit the site via MerrÎman road. Overall Design Year (2006) Traffic, as shown in Figures 41 through 52, was calculated by adding the Design Year (2006) Background traffic volumes for the peak hours and the site generated traffic. Design Year (2006) Buildout Traffic volumes were then analyzed for each scenario to determine roadway improvements required by the new development. '--- ilil Anderson & Associates, Inc_ Page 7 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Brambleton Avenue Capacitv Analvsis Analysis can not be performed on Brambleton Avenue as a multi-lane highway since the posted speed limit is 45 mph and this will result in a free flow speed of less than 45 mph. This speed is outside the scope of the Highway Capacity Manual's methodology for Multi-Lane Highways; therefore, recommendations and capacity analysis for Brambleton Avenue are based on intersection analyses. Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Intersection Analysis Below is a table, which summarizes overall delay and LOS results based on Synchro analysis: AM PM E F Based on the analysis results, overall maximum delay using Bojangles' site trips is increased by approximately 4.6 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. Based on the analysis results using ITE Generated Trips, the overall maximum delay is increased by approximately 8.3 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive Intersection Analvsis Below is a table, which summarizes overall delay and LOS results based on Synchro analysis: AM PM C E Based on the analysis results, overall maximum delay using Bojangles' site trips is increased by approximately 2_6 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. Based on the analysis results using ITE Generated Trips, the overall maximum delay is increased by approximately 4.6 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. f£ Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 8 of 17 5104105 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road Intersection Analysis Below is a table, which summarizes maximum delay and LOS results based on HCS Unsignalized analysis: AM PM LOS C C LOS D D LOS F F I 2006 Background Traffic 2006 Background Traffic (15% increase per VDOT Based on the analysis results, maximum delay using Bojangles' site trips is increased by approximately 10.7 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. Based on the analysis results using JTE Generated Trips, the overall maximum delay is increased by approximately 72.1 seconds due to the additional site traffic from the proposed development. The increase in delays from Existing Year (2005) to Design Year (2006) with traffic generated by the proposed development are due to the majority of site traffic utilizing the entrance located on Merriman Road. VDOT's Land Development Guidelines does not specify a minimum LOS at unsignalized intersections. A review of MUTCD signalization warrants does not necessitate a need for signalization. In reviewing the close proximity of this intersection with the intersection at Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue intersection, spacing is less that the minimum recommended by MUTCD. The only way in which a signalized intersection could properly function would be to provide a signal coordinated with the system along Brambleton Avenue. This would minimize queues on Colonial Avenue between Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road as well as allow the minor approaches to make left-turn movements. In order to obtain a more precise LOS for this intersection, it would be necessary to perform a signalized intersection analysis for this intersection along with the existing coordinated system; however, this is outside the scope of this study. -- ~- DJj. Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 9 of 17 5104105 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia ---- Discussion To be thorough in our investigation of Existing Traffic at the above listed intersections we have analyzed the data collected by A&A as well as the data increased by 15% per VDOT request. There is considerable difference between the two sets of data when analyzed. Analysis shows that counts obtained by A&A result in an overall LOS C or better for all intersections with the exception of the Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Intersection, which results in an overall LOS D for the PM peak hour. Analysis of the data that was increased to coincide with VDOT's ADT results in a LOS D or below for all intersections during both AM and PM peak hours with the exception of the Brambleton-Pleasant Hill Intersection which is a LOS B during the AM peak hour. It is our opinion that this development will have minimal impact to the surrounding intersections and the LOS shown in our analysis is overly conservative due to the following factors: . In talking with people that frequently travel through this area and observation of the traffic while obtaining traffic counts; in our opinion the data increased 15% per VDOT request does not accurately represent the actual traffic volumes in this area and that these volumes are overly conservative. . In our opinion, trips made to and from the site will be predominantly from vehicles already driving through the area and the development will not generate significant traffic that would otherwise not be in the area. According to VDOT Land Development Guidelines, VDOT Policy on Pass-by Trips, the generated traffic volumes onto adjacent roadways can be reduced by 15% for retail shops and 25% for fast food restaurants. To be conservative in our analysis we did not use the reduction in generated trips however, utilizing this reduction this would also significantly decrease the impact of the development on the intersections in the Design Year. Through our analysis it was determined that the generated traffic from the proposed development of the three intersections analyzed will have the greatest impact on the unsignalized Merriman Road & Colonial Avenue Intersection. However, a review of MUTCD signalization warrants does not indicate a need for a signal. The distance between this intersection and """=- Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue intersection is less than the minimum recommended by MUTCD. Analysis performed with Synchro of the Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Intersection shows that the queue length in the Existing Year "--. (2005) extends past the Colonial Avenue & Merriman intersection. This was also observed while obtaining traffic counts for the intersection. Based on the queuing lengths from the analysis and from observations, a signalized intersection coordinated with the system along Brambleton Avenue could be used in order to minimize queues on Colonial Avenue between Brambleton Avenue and Merriman Road. To obtain a more precise LOS for this intersection, it would be necessary to perform a signalized intersection analysis for this intersection along with the existing coordinated system. However this is beyond the original scope agreed upon by VDOT for this study. Anderson & Associate attempted to obtain the traffic signal timings as well as turning movement counts from VDOT for the remaining intersections in the coordinated system as well as the Brambleton Avenue & Route 419 intersection. VDOT was able to provide the traffic signal timings, but did not have the turning movement volumes required to analyze the system. '--~ .. f&. Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 10 of 17 5/04/05 8-1 IN 23639 Colonial Avenue Traffic Impact Study - Roanoke County, Virginia r Conclusions and Recommendations Existing Year 2005 and Design Year 2006 Background Traffic (Excluding Site Generated Traffic): Based on analysis results, the intersections analyzed as part of this study do not meet the desired LOS C as required by VDOT Land Development Guidelines without traffic generated by the proposed development. In reviewing the existing topography, roadway alignment, and existing developments adjacent to the intersections, it is not feasible to provide additional lanes as a mean of improving LOS. To provide a true representation of the actual LOS for the intersections, it would be necessary to perform a study to include the entire coordinated system as previously discussed. Based on traffic delays observed while obtaining turning movement counts as well as conversations with people who frequently travel through the study area, the analysis results shown in this study appear to be overly conservative. This could be due in part to the fact that intersections in this study were analyzed as individual actuated signals when in reality, they are part of a coordinated system of multiple signals. Design Year 2006 Buildout Traffic (Including Site Generated Traffic): Brambleton Avenue & Colonial Avenue Results of analysis of 2006 Background Traffic in the area combined with traffic generated by the proposed development show that increased delays from traffic utilizing the proposed site are minimal and should not significantly affect the overall LOS of the intersection. Overall Average Delays increase 13.2 seconds in the AM peak hour and 8.3 seconds in the PM peak hour. Brambleton Avenue & Pleasant Hill Drive Results of analysis of 2006 Background Traffic in the area combined with traffic generated by the proposed development show that increased delays from traffic utilizing the proposed site are minimal and should not significantly affect the overall LOS of the intersection. Overall Average Delays increase 3.7 seconds in the AM peak hour and 4.6 seconds in the PM peak .~ hour. Colonial Avenue & Merriman Road Results of analysis of 2006 Background Traffic in the area combined with traffic generated by the proposed development show that increased delays from traffic utilizing the proposed site are minimal and should not significantly affect the overall LOS of the intersection. Overall Average Delays increase 10.3 seconds in the AM peak hour and 10.7 seconds in the PM peak hour. VDOT's Land Development Guidelines does not specify a minimum level of service at un signalized intersections. MUTCD signal warrants were checked for the Colonial Avenue and Merriman Road intersection and it was determined that none of the warrants for a signal were met. The minor roadway approach will experience an increase in the delay by less 10 seconds, therefore no changes to the intersection are recommended. The increase in the volumes with the use of the 15% increase recommended by VDOT and the use of the ITE trip generation increases the delays. The MUTCD signal warrants are still not met and since the increase in delays are slightly greater than one minute. Brambleton Avenue Site Entrance Based on traffic utilizing Brambleton Avenue during peak hours, it is recommended that the entrance on Brambleton Avenue only allow right turns in and out of the site. A 50-foot right turn lane is required with a 100 foot taper on Brambleton Avenue to provide a deceleration lane for traffic entering the site. Merriman Road Site Entrance Based on turning movement volumes of traffic entering the site from Merriman Road, a right turn taper of 100 feet is recommended. No left turn lane is required. A review of sight distance requirements is also recommended to verify that the proposed site entrance maintains minimum sight distance requirements. However, it is our understanding that sight distance requirements will be addressed as part of the site plans. '-- . Jiß. Anderson & Associates, Inc. Page 11 of 17 5/04/05 (' ..::,-~ PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Caveness Properties, LLC 14-8/2005 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 16, 2005 (Rescheduled from August 2, 2005) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 23, 2005 A. REQUEST The petition of Caveness Properties, LLC to rezone .156 acres from R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District to C-1, Office District for the construction of a parking area in conjunction with an office, located at 5604 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Karen Rose, the former Board President of Woods Crossing Home Owners Association spoke and relayed the continued support of the HOA for the purchase and rezoning of the .156 acres. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Kate Youngbluth presented the staff report. Mr. Edward Natt spoke on behalf of the project stating that the property owner had purchased the land from the HOA to accommodate additional parking on the site. The owner wanted to reconfigure the parking on site so that the front of the property did not contain the majority of parking spaces. In addition he addressed deed restrictions that insured existing vegetation would remain and that the owner would plant additional trees along the property line between Woods Crossing and the Caveness property. Mr. McNeil inquired about Zoning Ordinance parking requirements and Mr. Natt responded that the parking would exceed County standards at 19 spaces. Mr. McNeil also asked how much traffic would be generated by the site. Mr. Natt responded that it would be primarily employees with infrequent client visits. Mr. Azar asked if the parking on the backside of the property would be primarily employee and Mr. Natt agreed. Mr. Jarrell inquired as to an entrance off of Woods Crossing Drive and Mr. Natt said that no entrance would be constructed in that area. D. CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. McNeil made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the rezoning request. Motion carried 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 8-2 8-2 Petitioner: Caveness Properties LLC Request: This is a request to rezone .156 acres on 5604 Starkey Road from R-3 to C-1 in order to construct a parking lot for an office building. 5604 Starkey Road Cave Spring None Location: Magisterial District: Proffered/Suggested Conditions: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request by Christopher Caveness to rezone .156 acres on Starkey Road from R-3 to C-1. The applicant recently bought this parcel from the Woods Crossing Home Owners Association. The property would accommodate additional parking for the office building that will be constructed. The .154 acre area is located in a Transition designated area as shown by the Land Use Map of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. A Transition designation is defined as follows by the Land Use Map: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Rezoning the property to C-1 would be in substantial accord with the Transition designation of the Land Use Map of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS · The Zoning Ordinance requires that parking for C-1 use be in a C-1 zoning district. · The site and building plans must go through the Roanoke County plan review process prior to construction. · The commercial entrance for the site must be meet VDOT's standards. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS BackQround - The office property was rezoned from R-3 to C-1 during the 1992 Zoning Ordinance update. Until the Caveness LLC bought the property in December of 2004 the site had been used as a single family residence. Caveness LLC is in the process of converting the residence into an office. Site evaluation has shown that additional acreage is needed to accommodate the Zoning Ordinance's parking requirements. Caveness LLC purchased .154 acres of R-3 zoned land from the Woods Crossing Home Owner's Association to comply with regulations. 1 8-2 TopoqraphvlVeqetation - The eastern and northern portions of the property contain the majority of vegetation. The east side has a number of mature trees; beyond the trees the property slopes into an intermittent stream and grass field. The northern portion contains large trees and shrubs along Woods Crossing Drive. Surroundinq Neiqhborhood - The property is backed by a R-3 zoned area that is governed by the Woods Crossing Home Owners Association. On the southwest portion of the property lies a R-3C zoned area that contains townhomes. To the north of the property lies a vacant C-1 zoned property. Finally, the property to the northwest-west area is R-1. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site LavouUArchitecture - The subject property will only contain a portion of the required parking area for office use. Ten parking spaces (including one handicapped) will be placed on the additional acreage. Existing vegetation meets the Zoning Ordinance buffering requirements between the C-1 and the R-3 zoned areas. This area contains a number of mature trees and an intermittent stream. AccessfTraffic Circulation - Access to the parking lot will be through the office site. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - There are no significant impacts to Fire and Rescue services. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The .154 acre area is located in aT ransition designated area in accordance with the Land Use Map of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Map definition of a Transition area is as follows: A future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Rezoning the property to C-1 would be in substantial accord with the Transition definition of the Land Use Map of the 2005 Comprehensive plan. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Rezoning this property from R-3 to C-1 properly matches the C-1 use with the C-1 zoning designation. The existing vegetation serves as a sufficient buffer between the R-3 and the C-1 zones. In conclusion the proposed rezoning from R-3 to C-1 is in conformance with the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: 14-8/2005 Katherine D. Youngbluth PC: 8/2105 BOS: 8/23/05 2 8-2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl Date received: Received by: 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX 776-7155 Application fee: <\"1"1.0 PC/BZA date: Placards issued: BOS date: Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance o Waiver o Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address wlzip C'AVENESS ffiOPERTl ES, L. L.C. Contact: Edward A. Natt, Esq. 3140 Cha arral Dr., Suite 200 C, Rke 24018 Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No.: 725-8180 725-8180 Owner's name/address wlzip C'AVENESS PRDPERrI ES, L. L.C. Contact: Edward A. Natt, Esq. 31QO Chaparral Dr., Suite 200~, Property Location 5604 Starkey Road (fonmerly a part of Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: '174-0961 725-8180 725-8180 774-0961 Rke 24018 Magisterial District: Cave S Tax Map No.: . 087.19-03-33 ( ortion) Community Planning area: Cave Spr i ng Existing Zoning: R-3 Proposed Zoning: C-1 Proposed Land Use: Park i ng area in conjunct i on wi th off i ce Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VariancefWaiver ~f Section(s) \ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RISfW V/AA R/S/W V/AA R/S/W V/AA m Consultation Ei 8 1/2" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee X Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner ofJht:..p.IDPJ r ' 2fôD.tor qmtrjlct p,urchaser and am acting with the knowJedge and consent of the owner. LAVEN II::::>, L. L.L.. BY: Owner's Signature Its ~M~ 1-1 B }'k.~4I\ f!.:r 2 8-2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Applicant CAVENESS PROPERTIES, L.L.C. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The rezoning of this parcel will enable the property owner to place additional parking for its office in the rear rather than along the stone wall at the entrance of Woods Crossing Drive on the side of the subject property. Adequate screening will be provided from adjoining properties for this parking area. It is to be noted that this property was secured after approval from the Woods Crossing Homeowners Association for the transfer in order to enable parking to be placed in the rear rather than along the stone wall at the entrance of Woods Crossing Drive on the side of the subject property so as not to affect the view upon entrance into Woods Crossing Subdivision. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The project will conform to the policies contained in the Community Plan by putting additional parking in the rear rather than along the stone wall at the entrance of Woods Crossing Drive on the side of the subject property. Adequate screening will be provided from the adjoining property of Woods Crossing. Again, this property has been acquired for this sole purpose after consultation and approval from the Woods Crossing Board of Directors and general Membership. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. There will be no impact on public facilities. F:\USERS\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Caveness Prop JUSTIFICATION REZONING.doc Community Development 8-2 Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICA nON ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff andJ'or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. C øver'\e~S 141Je,-t'es' LL C ~ Name of petl~. Q~ ~;gnatu,.p D5 Date 8-2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Address of Subject Property: Tax Map No.: 5604 Starkey Road Part of 087.19-03-33 Applicant/Owner's Name: Caveness Properties ==================================================================== BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Starkey Road and the southerly side of Woods Crossing Drive (private road), said point being designated as Point 1 on the PLAT OF SURVEY FOR CA VENESS PROPERTIES, LLC, 5604 STARKEY ROAD, SHOWING THE CONVEYANCE AND COMBINATION OF A 0.156 ACRE PORTION OF EXISTING TAX PARCEL 87.19-3-33, BEING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY OF THE WOODS CROSSING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, CREATING A NEW 0.590 ACRE PARCEL, prepared by ACS Design under date of April 29, 2005; thence with the southerly line of Woods Crossing Drive S. 65° 55' 00" E. 142.68 feet to the actual place of BEGINNING, being designated as Point 2 on said plat; thence S. 65° 55' 00" E. 36.28 feet to Point 3 on said plat, said point being on the southerly line of Woods Crossing Drive; thence leaving Woods Crossing Drive through the property of Woods Crossing Homeowners Association (DB 1299, PG 1657) the following courses and distances: S. 04° 25' 00" W. 27.78 feet to Point 4; thence S. 13° 56' 36" W. 105.48 feet to Point 5; thence N. 65° 55' 00" W. 64.20 feet to Point 6; thence with the easterly line of the former tract of Caveness Properties, L.L.C. N. 24° 05' 00" E. 130 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING, and containing 0.156 acre. \\JOLL y\SYS\USERS\CBaumgardner\zONING\Caveness Prop LEGAL.doc Page 1 of 1 8-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,2005 ORDINANCE TO REZONE .156 ACRES FROM R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO C-1, OFFICE DISTRICT, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING AREA IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN OFFICE LOCATED AT 5604 STARKEY ROAD (PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 87.19-3-32), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE APPLICATION OF CAVENESS PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 2005, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 2005; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 16, 2005; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .156 acres, as described herein, and located at 5604 Starkey Road (Part of Tax Map Number 87.19-3-32) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Caveness Properties, LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly side of Starkey Road and the southerly side of Woods Crossing Drive (private road), said point being designated as Point 1 on the Plat of Survey for Caveness Properties, LLC, 5604 Starkey Road, Showing the Conveyance and Combination of a 0.156 Acre Portion of Existing Tax Parcel 87.19- 3-33, Being a Portion of the Property of the Woods Crossing Homeowners Association, Creating a New 0.590 Acre Parcel, prepared by ACS Design under date of April 29, 2005; thence with the southerly line of Woods Crossing Drive S. 65° 1 8-2 55' 00" E. 142.68 feet to the actual place of beginning, being designated as Point 2 on said plat; thence S. 65° 55' 00" E. 36.28 feet to Point 3 on said plat, said point being on the southerly line of Woods Crossing Drive; thence leaving Woods Crossing Drive through the property of Woods Crossing Homeowners Association (DB 1299, PG 1657) the following courses and distances: S. 04° 25' 00" W. 27.78 feet to Point 4; thence S. 13° 56' 36" W. 105.48 feet to Point 5; thence N. 65° 55' 00" W. 64.20 feet to Point 6; thence with the easterly line of the former tract of Caveness Properties, LLC, N. 24° 05' 00" E. 130 feet to the point and place of beginning, and containing 0.156 acre. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 z (j) U1 dt ci1 ~ q ~ :E N N ICS DESIGN Engileemg· Plannilg· SuT\'e)ing Construction MCI'Iogement - N ~ VJ ~ N --I o --I » r '-'" ~/: TARKY ROAD VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTE 904 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WA Y N2T21'14"E EXISTING LOT 0.434 AC. 30.18' 95.16' 0'> to U1 -0 ;;0 o -0 o (J "T1 o OJ ~ ï o Z C> S24·05'OO"W 130.00' tv co. ____ ED LAND TO PURCHASE PROPO:6774.19 sa.FT. ........-;""oO·~ ---= --- 0.156 AC. oft]...":>. ___ 2~\)ff(R S ']...1 :1ß '{ þ..RO --- .''tJ -t,or;:þ' :;6 S'.J . ,05. A-B (j) ~ N o 2203 Peters Creek Road, NW Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Phone: 540 562 2345 Fax: 540 562 2344 Eman: infoOacsdesignDc.com www.acsdesignllc.com EXIST. DECELERATION LANE N25"53'50"E 35.02' 0'> CO to 34.07' 0__ ~(J ï-t'T COx z;;o- c>-<~ "*!:OJz U1;;oc> 01- 0('") ~^ 30' 0' ~ GRAPHIC SCALE (f) (j) U1 ~J o 0: 'T\ ~ ~ N 0'> co. - ~ -.....J (X) to 0'> --I o --I » r '-'" VJ 30' ~ a a CJ U) ~ C') -- ~ :::0 ~ ::0 a a U) :J:,. tJ U) - <: C) CJ :::0 - ~ r"Y1 60' I 1" = 30' ü <> ¡;¡ "" '" f5 '-' g~ ::; :j~~~~~ I:::'!'~~..',~ J:::C:::r:I'IIi( f5~~(.)~~ ~Q;C~Q)~ 6:c:tfgò- <0 '" 2; 5 :q¡ VJQ..I..J a..õ ~~~8~'" ~,,<e;~,,<~ (j~~ ~~ <t is ~ ~ <> <> .... is ~ 13 ~ 0:: § '-' .;; ~ 15 ~ .... ... ~I§ '" ..: .... .... ~'" '" ~~~ð "'''' '" :t~~~ ~!!!I::O:: c~~~ ~a: '- ;¡;"'", ~~!::!5 :5-ô~ ~~H~g ~~R~~ .....<::pz C'.I '. [S ~ <> ~ 8 ~ ~..:~~ '" ~~~"'~ :? it"''''eJe¡ :!;<>S'....'" '-'Ì Vi'-').. v Š .... "J",II:~", 15 ~o~ .... II) '" - '" ~a¡ L.,¡ ì!:"''''' '" it ",2~~~ L.,¡ ;:-~§~ !:J :jæ'-'",;: ¡:: !jg~ì!: ì!: r::: "'C t,p;~:t: ~ ~ rs~e;;~ ,ðfS¡¡:ê¡¡:j .g:i!....~Qj ~ "'~~o~ ...., ~)..~:35 ...., :z:: tD t) I.,:,I:~. -q: ~QQ~~ ~ <.5 ::;:5'-' ¡:: <:)....~ ::';ï!: ~ ;~i¡!§5 "" "'''''''''-'-' ,'"'?<~ "\~...~ ~ 'b ~ ....., '&- !!i ~~~ "'ö ~~~ ...~~...:. i5e&i~ 1S"'0::\!: ~~~~ CS::::OO) ""''''Q~ h~; ~~eg ~:Sê ~¡g~~ !Q~§~ ~'-'tt1 ~)..Þ::¡:¡: "(O'JI.Uë;, Ceð", ~~a:~ "'C::::q",,~ iQiÈì!:Ö ~~~~ ='" >0 ~H~ "'~~'" t,)õ~~ u",Ï!: ~t~~ i'3rs¡¡¡e ",&",0 so::!t§ ~~~t! ....ì!:iSe h~~ " '" ~~ ~"" Q~ ,,'" =~ i3::; ",,,,, "'>- ~~ I:{;~ "'!>- e~ ....'" ~~ §'" "'>- ",,,, ~~ ~3 u,~ ;£5 " ~ §ê ~ c:. " ~;;; ~ êê ~ ~~ ~ .... fi (,) ~Q 'IIi( t'" '" rs·"" ';) [!;."< ~ 5.t=~ ~ :::~ - ~'" ;: ~~ ~ "'~ ì!:~ ~ '" 'i .... /: ~ (' : e ð ~~~ Lu<l(~7 ~lt)Lu'" ~f5(.)~ l:3i~;;: ""COJQ:) ~~~o ~"'5~ ~~<>... L.J~D::I~ D:::V)Q),¡;: ~~~ !\ \ , ~ ~ Q~~ ~5"'C \;~t!e ~Oif¡¡'" ¡;¡""'~ ~~"G: u"'~'" "'~e}jì( ~"'C~ c:,.¡ 5~2: ~ QD::I'IIi(þ::L.,j "'C ~G::::2~ i3 r.,,) ¡.",¡ æ: Q 'II{ if¡ ~~~~ã ~ ¡j,,:¡¡:é g ~~~~~ ~ ~~cc~ c: ~~"''''5 ~ o.:-¡¡¡"'III '" ~)..~~~ i;J~ì!:iSè: § §~~h ~ ()>-;::.",5 >- [Q~"'{<.J æ ~~I!§~~ rs i;Jd~~ '" Ë~~~~ '" 'C I::\i¡ 0:: ~ ~g~~~ ~ ~!:!dì!: IS fb "'!'> !Ii: ¡ Q:~~:g¡,." ~~t~~ ~ ~8~~~ ~ "'~~>-ð ~::tQ..Q'Ju ~ ,~ '" f;j <> ~ '" ~~ d II. ~I~ t:~ :ïE ¡:;:> .. .... u 0 s: '" ~ ~ <:'3(§) §e &i§ ~~ ",::¡ ",8 ~~~ k;;.!, <>8' I:!..~ ~ " £Octl ö~o ~iS~ )...~"'{ ~e;:; ","< 3:~ I I~ I I I" I:::~ 12", "-~ ~~ gt1 ~ffi t30:: §~ t5~ N65'5S'OO"W tí! .... .1l9"ZYI (7'fJ-DlJ .96'8/.1 31tltia CJYO/J 3j,(I\//J=I 9NISSOtiJ I;! ;§ ~ '" ;! ß VI"> ~~ ~~ ~~ <> ~~ °is ~~ eo: ¡Eo.: ~~ 8~ "'~ I "'<:'3 ~>- ~ ~Q'J " ~ I ~ æt:) r'] '" ~~ ~>- f?ë§ ~ I '..> ~ >- 0:: :!; o '" I~ 1<3 0:: I~ ~ì!: ...... ....~ !š'" ò~ ~" t-~ c~ I~ !!; ~ ~ 1;; I! ~ I::: '" ~ ",v; ~~ ~~ 1¡!~ ~8 ~~ e~ .,,'" 01;; ~:g <>5 ~if¡ ,;~ :).. ....111 ~ I ~¡¡; ~ ]~ <> '" ~~~ o::>-iS o"'{~ "'''0:: "' 1"- 2: I¡;' ~ '" ~ e:. i2 ,~ I~ ~ '" i '" i;J § <:'3 ~ '" "" 5 ¡;¡ '" '" is ~ §~' ~~ ~èi ~y) ~~n~ ~~ VI.... ,~~ Ii:"" ~ ~ì!: >-.... ....'C ~~ ~~ tð Co ~ '" ~ ~ '" l!t Ii! ~ "" g I~ I~ ß ð '" ~ ~ I~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ 1;; '" :¡ § )... '" ~ is ¡[tjì!:", §"'o~ o.:~êš ~~~~ <>",0 ~~~~ ~1;;~'" ¡:s!:<>0: ""§j'-'ì!: ~~~!E ~è:~~ ë5~V)C ~81¡;'~ ~~ì!:'" ",~!E~ §~~~ \u",:>~ ð~ërL.J ~...ðQ: 01::(.,,)'- <C!E",~ ~t5""i¡! )..~g~ ~~V)~ i55"ÏiS !iH§~ !.iju....Q: "'",,,,,-;¡; ""fE~5g §ii!I;!i¡!~ Œ~~~~ ';¡~~:;'¡;: '-' ~ ::> ;;: ~ o '" 3.DO.Ç!;S9S saOOM ,., o ~ ~ '" '" i .; .... I~ '''' "" ~ <:s.... ~iS~ éh ",e " 5'È '-'~Q ðð9 ~~~I 0:: I;! ~<S ~~~ 5f5Q '-'\..)~.; 53!~g (",)t=:ct::N !§¡?:2 ~;Eê ~... ~"'{~ "'ê"" ~ ~iS!::!~ ~ ëst"Jß>- ~ ~g:~~ ~ ß\Q ~ I ~ ö~", :;; ~~t ~ 1-1.1) fž t.o') ;¡;;£ì!:;£ ¡:¡ 1>- I~ 115 '.> ¡ I~ ,0:: '~~ ~~ ,. " ~~ I~~ i~~ I"'" ~~ ~ '" <c ~ '" '0 .2 ~ õ J; :\ i ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ") ~ ~ Ë I \..... l ,~~ ¡ /1 /j . P~~_:f' / g'; y/ !!-... "" ~= ? ~~ '<? a>g' rc.. 0) [:,Q- £"E o~~:z; :!i] U :z;r-.¡..;g ~! -a oQEir..(-.ì~ ... ¡::tà°~~.... .. :!!u:..ol>;!;¿ fIi .....~¡..;g¡~ e: III ~""f3"':r.:¡!!2~~ g¡¡:c::. O><!Q"tf.¡¡¡;c::.i3O. "-Q:è§u~~~~;¡!~",~ >-IU<I::~ "":2:; - QÌ w.. :... ~ t) r.:¡!i::i g ei >-_'" n >... 41 :z;...o"" "'.... . :r.... "" r.:¡!::¡:::r.:¡ .lI')~::::!- =>..., Q;: Ull') :::!!o <:3:::><1:: 1I1~i:!::z;~r.,OIk",o!i\:4i ~Q;lrl¡::;r.:¡O::t:r.:¡::;¡u -.J I-fI)~~r.,:Z;t):Z;~~~~ <!f4g2:°g~..:¡:¡:o:;;:lI') ë: h. I/) O:z; ~ g¡ t) Cl ~ tt:: ... uOoo~(Jjoc::. ~ r.:¡!::Q,,¡J¡..; \.u0:: ::a¡; ¡::g;..:tf.¡~ ~ ""t)~A:. ~ t)r.:¡:>-ou U 1!¡¡¡;;;:¡o It:ur.:ilk o...:J:t¡ ~ro "" ..... Q ~ ¡of x ~ ... ::~ ~~ I, ~~ "" .,,,, Co ... "''''~ 0.:0.: ... He "'" ~:!; !! , I .. I:::t;: 13 55 "II: "'Coca ;;~ a. "';"": In o~ d Ñ .... ~ I ,6119 '" is Ö ~ ::> ;¡. ~ So: II: " ::. ö 8.-2 o '" <- o g o I ~ .,; :z' ¡¡j ò 5 N Ii) '-' ~ '" f3 ò I ~ " ~I i5 <> co .... ~ 0.: . c .2 I I \~ I c(!;>- I O::"'~ ~~ ~¿ :>-.~ª ",,0:: t..J~ì!: ~~~ Q:~~ """" ~~ii: I-~~ ."'Zåi ~§"~I§ ...., =- ' I Ji~~ { c:.:»¡;¡I ~E:¡~ i __1M. h.;:;~~ _1:1 ~UHE 8-2 cnZI ;¡¡~: I~I . ]'~~.' CD . ""Nt" ....- f ]i~~j! .....rn-: K:,,:;~t1 -... :..~.~ ....= ¡ ~WH I ~I ~II ~I ~I. C'! ~~ ~II _~~~ -r-hO : Ii :5 .. ~ i ~ (.) ~~ ~ a ¡; 11 ~ ~ ~ ¡;¡!! I YINI~~I^ 'A.lNnO:l3)ONYO~ S31~~3dO~d SS3N3^Y:I ~O:! NV1d 3.US Z 3SYHd ei -:' h "'C =¡ ~ il ~ ;! 1 I: ~ .8 I) . . . ~ i~ i~ w . ~~ ··1 h· l~i;1 ~ ~~ dr~~ j l!! ~i~~~ i~ ~ I' ife~~ i& '" =~ ~~~h u ¡ { i;i~~ ~S Ie ; .;:f~I·~ ~. ..t:",ft: ¡~ ~ L: ¡a.·~ h ,:;I) ~t'~¡ ~. H~~ 5 ",. ~~. ø ø!ul ~ ê~.·~ ;~A~ ~ .~/ I .... r C-.& "o·s ~ 5 I ~~ r~ ~ ~ ::i ! ~ .. c i!:!' '" 11: '" 2 ,.,,, "" <! ~ ~ ~ g ~.. In ~ J h ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ . - ~ :; .. ~ ¡¡ ( ~ < ~ . J .~ s ~ 5 5 . ~ ~ ~ ~ . b ~ i ~~ ~ ii I ~~ t =~ . ~N h~ . I :G H .. ~: .. h "" ;= !i ; 8 ~ b ¡ ~I~ k .~; i ~;' ., fii t i 1,,5 ei1 ~~ .~~~ ~~ ., §Q~~!I ~~ :~i! .~f Ë;. I ~ ¡g~~ ~ ~~~ I: . Lis i '" ~: . i~I'~~~U~ -: ".5 ~. 5 ~ ~ j ='S ð"~tt'!t ii'I 8' - . ... ¡ .~t'IA ..' ;.. J I!'~ ~~il ~ ... "', ~ ¡d·5 ~ ¡'g~"e~ "'I) 1-... ,;;'~"~'Ip ~'.'5i.I!:I",. :/::__ ... "'f ~ . i ~ '\. 7 ~ ~ .I ' · i!i '\.j" äh ~¡: .. rt !ì~ ~ ~æ ~ ~= ~ t! ~ "( -ë ~ Ø;: ~ ~~;, : i 2& I) ~ Q ;, u· ~ "'..!~ I '" . 1 0 1 " ~ .6 , <.>- , , ~ " ~~ . -""""'" "- ! ~ ~ ; ~ i l ~ ~ ~ <: ! i "'< 2 . ct ~ i ~ i~ ... q~ ~ J'd S ~" '" e- .. ~~ a ~P5 2, 2. f iiil) .. . !I e = . ~ N " ! dp § I) ~ " n ~ ä , i.. . .. Îeb T ~¡~ ;11 ;~ bg . hi ~ . ~~ r @ ¡¡is .W· m ~t: ...... i~j ~., ~~ ~.. .b t!!: a It E! §Ii! U' liII II!¡: ij"~b ~2~ i:;1 i~1 ~"ij. I 'N ~ ~ ~ ¡;it I b~ ~ E ~ ' i~~.!:; ¡~ " ~ ~ rl~~~ \ =~ d ~~ !~iI~ I Q~h ).. G . ~ ~2" <>:: ~" ;~ir~ ~.fi ~ i~ ä ,~ .t' "I ¡= ¡I~ ~ ~"il: ".~ ~ "i~ iiI ~~~u !' - g I~ ~ :¡ . ' :c~ ~ ~" I b~ ¡Ii fi :,. ·ii ' .¡ ~i ;¡~, ¡It" 5 =.: = . I;; :!' :~t" ~~; ~.! ~. ~ I~ 'r ~~~ ,,~~ I" t ð W ~. ...~I :0' "0 ~~i :It ~S ~~... ~h ~ ~ ... ."" ai" .~~ b ~n I ~I i~ ~ ~ ~t ~ .. 'b b~~ ,~ ~" Ri ~ ~ I! ¡ ~ ä , ~ ~ ' D ~.ø· \\ \: -. ~ ~ ~~h ' ¡Ii! II \ II t53· \ 81 ;:S~g \ \ i \ ~~h \ d \ "I,I. =' '--+'-1 ~2~¡ \ .¡ ii~¡¡ \ \ ~. ~~n \ '8 a n ~~. \ ~.~ ~¡~~ \ h ~,; ~~~~ \ ~tJ ~.. \ ~¡~~ 5 I '\ fi i ~r=,.c ~~ä~~~ II ~8 I' Ir~&"~; i ~~. .,1 ~.. 5.~=' , I :;Ii;~! \, \ ' ¡,~.~.. ,., , ~!I $" .t '.~!ì ì!dig I~!~~~ '. ""''''''''' AlOUIHI AOf' ow 11'" 'N077 ... "....., .·f('-rø---.I~"lR'l .. Øt'OIt .II:"IUW 31R1O ::JN1SSOH:J SOOOff / ~ Zoning ~ _AG3 _EP _AG. AR _AV C, .C2 _ C2CVOO 11 [~12 .PCO PRO _PTO R1 R:! R3 R4 Street Centerlines Roanoke County Department of Community Development 8-2 / s~ ( . ''''OI.J},t'',</~ D~ ~ - Applicants Name: Caveness Properties, L.L.G. Existing Zoning: R-3 Proposed Zoning: C-1 Tax Map Number,' 87.19-3-32 (portion) Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.156 Acres June 27,2005 1 inch equals 100 feet 5-3 PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Vision Builders, LLC 15-8/2005 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 16, 2005 (Rescheduled from August 2, 2005) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 23, 2005 A. REQUEST The petition of Vision Builders, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store on approximately 1.9 acres, located at 6044 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Four citizens spoke. They had concerns regarding environmental issues with the gasoline station, who would be paying for traffic improvements, rodents in the existing buildings, drainage, need to anchor the gasoline tanks, need to remove the old house and barn. One citizen stated that the area for the planned regional storm water detention facility had been filled, many years ago, with debris from the airport tunnel and the old dinner theatre. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Janet Scheid presented the staff report. Mrs. Hooker stated concerns for what the gasoline canopy would look like. Mr. Jarrell expressed concerns for the hours of operation and future connections to Vivian Avenue and Nover Avenue. D. CONDITIONS 1. All building, including gas island canopy, exterior walls shall be brick, horizontal slate or vertical board and batten siding (materials shall be either wood, fiber cement or vinyl material) from grade to eave. 2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers, cupola or similar designs. 3. Colors used in all exterior building materials including the canopy will be subdued and will not be bright. 4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear, unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches. 5. Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy. 6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed 8-3 downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site. 7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet. 8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. 9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument style not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feet in width, and shall be constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy. Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 11. Dumpster - The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy. 12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of 1 0:00pm and 7:00am. 13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet wide along the entire length of the northeast property boundary. 14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site. 15. Building(s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet. 16. Hours of operation shall be between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m. 17. No access shall be allowed from Nover Avenue or Vivian Avenue. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Jarrell made a motion to make a favorable recommendation for the special use permit request. Motion carried 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 8-3 Petitioner: Vision Builders LLC Request: Special Use Permit to Construct a Convenience Store Location: 6044 Peters Creek Road Magisterial District: Hollins ProfferedlSuggested Conditions: 1. All building exterior walls shall be brick from grade to eave. 2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers, cupola or similar designs. 3. Colors used in all exterior building materials including the canopy will be subdued and will not be bright. 4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear, unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches. 5. Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy. 6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site. 7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet. 8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. 9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument style not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feet in width, and shall be brick construction to match the buildings. Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 11. Dumpster - The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. 12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00pm and 7:00am. 13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet wide along the entire length of the northeast property boundary. 14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site. 15. Building{s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners propose to develop these 1.9 acres as a convenience store. The property is zoned C-2, General Commercial. The convenience store land use requires a Special Use Permit. The property is designated Transition in the 2005 Community Plan. This designation encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels so as to provide a buffer between highways and adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are generally more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale retail uses. 1 8-3 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A. The Use and Design Standards contained in Section 30-85-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance state: 1. Limited sale of foods prepared on the premises may be allowed provided no more than twenty (20) percent of the floor areas are devoted to seating facilities. Seating areas in excess of this shall constitute a fast food restaurant. 2. Exterior display of merchandise for sale is allowed under the following conditions: a. On a paved walkway within three (3) feet of the building. b. Ice machines and soft drink vending machines, in operating condition, shall be stored under roofed areas. 3. The display of vehicles "for sale" is prohibited. B. Site plan review will be required. C. VDOT will be responsible for issuing a Commercial Entrance permit. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Backqround - This 1.9-acre site is part of a larger 16-acre site known as the Jones Farm. The property has not been utilized as a farm for many years. TopoqraphyNeqetation - This 1.9-acre site is mostly rolling fields with a few trees along the northeast boundary. Surroundinq Neiqhborhood - This 1.9-acre site adjoins C-2 zoned property to the north that is developed as a dentist office. It adjoins Peters Creek Road on the east and other portions of the C-2 zoned Jones Farm on the south and west. Directly to the north it adjoins R-1 residential property that fronts on Nover Avenue. The general area to the north, once off the Peters Creek frontage, is developed as long established single- family residential properties. The general area is commercial on Peters Creek Road and residential- either single-family or multi-family town homes - further off Peters Creek Road. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - Petitioners are seeking a Special Use Permit for a convenience store. They have stated that they are in discussions with several types of convenience stores including Sheetz and PM!. They are proposing to subdivide a 1.9 acre parcel off from the rest of the Jones Farm to develop the convenience store at the corner of Peters Creek Road and what would become an extension of Airport Road. It is proposed that the new convenience store would front on the new Airport Road extension, therefore the right side of the store would front on Peters Creek Road. The convenience store would include gas pumps with a gas pump island canopy structure. An architectural style has not been proposed by the petitioners as a specific user has not been identified. An architectural rendering has been submitted and discussed at the community meeting showing a Sheetz store with a brick facade, tall glass windows, subdued colors, outdoor seating, awnings and an articulated roof line. Submitted concept plan for the store shows the gas island and canopy to the front of the proposed store with parking spaces along the Peters Creek frontage and around the store site. 2 8-3 Access/Traffic Circulation - The submitted concept plan shows access directly from Peters Creek Road on the northeast side of the site. In addition, the extension of Airport Road would necessitate the change of the 3-way traffic signal to a 4-way traffic signal and additional site access is shown from the new extension of Airport Road. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance standards require that this new road be a public road in order to subdivide individual lots off of the road. The VDOT has provided staff comments on the proposed Special Use Permit. They include the following points: 1 )Strongly recommend that a Traffic Impact Analysis be submitted to determine the need for turn lanes, tapers, modifications to the existing traffic signal, right of way and easement issues; 2)No access should be allowed from either Vivian or Nover Avenues; 3)Alllots within the proposed development should have internal access from Airport Road Extension only with no direct access from Peters Creek Road; 4)The proposed extension of Airport Road should be aligned with Peters Creek Road rather than offset as shown on the concept plan. Anthony Ford, Roanoke County Traffic Engineer, concurs with the comments of VDOT and is prepared to review any submitted Traffic Impact Analysis and provide comments to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as requested. Prior to SUP application submission, the applicant was made aware of the potential need for traffic analysis and the possibility of delay in the SUP request. The traffic volume on this section of Peters Creek Road is 21,867 vehicles per day and the Level of Service on this section is classified as "B" - very good. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - This site is 0.6 miles from the Hollins Fire Station and no significant impacts on fire and rescue services are anticipated. Community Meetinq - A community meeting was held on Tuesday, July 19, 2005. Approximately 30 citizens attended the meeting and expressed the following concerns with the petitioners' application: lighting, noise, trash, need for another convenience store, screening and buffering, stormwater, traffic impacts including costs and questions about who pays for them, incentives, elevation of site relative to Nover, Vivian and Peters Creek, property values, rodents in the old farm house and proximity to residential neighborhoods. The petitioners presented their architectural rendering of the Sheetz store, discussed the concept plan, explained their project and answered questions. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The site is designated Transition in the Roanoke County Land Use Plan. As such, there is the possibility that the proposed use would not fit well in that designation. In addition to multifamily residential and town homes the Transition land use designation encourages office and institutional uses and small-scale planned and clustered retail uses. With appropriate site design, appropriate mass, volume and scale of buildings and appropriate architectural designs the convenience store could be a suitable use. On the other hand, without these controls the convenience store could be an inappropriate use in the Transition category. 3 8-3 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this Special Use Permit, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. All building exterior walls shaH be brick from grade to eave. 2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers, cupola or similar designs. 3. Colors used in all exterior building materials including the canopy, will be subdued and will not be bright. 4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear, unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches. 5. Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy. 6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site. 7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet. 8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. 9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument style not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feet in width, and shall be brick construction to match the buildings. Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 11. Dumpster - The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be brick construction to match the buildings. 12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00pm and 7:00am. 13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet wide along the entire length of the northeast property boundary. 14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site. 15. Building(s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet. DATE: August 2, 2005 CASE NUMBER: 15-8/2005 HEARING DATES: 8/2105 PC PREPARED BY: Janet Scheid 8/23/05 BOS 4 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl Dale r eived: ú Application fee: L) . c:Ð 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX 776-7155 Placards issued: Case Number 540 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) í Rezoning ::z Special Use ;-¡ Variance Waiver Applicants name/address w/zip Vision Builders LLC 3959 Electric Road, Suite 100 Roanoke VA 24018 Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip \ Phone #: . ~Ob ~J~~ .)l9h~l v.(ëA~t..~..J~ Work: eve _1~ns ~H.' f.L..A_.1 D~xN #: 7~ Coe I~ \\.....\,.). ð Ct),.:) Property Location 6044 Peters Creek Road Magisterial District: Community Planning area: 8-3 - cf:;, Received by: PClBZA dale: Ave.. ~ - Administrative Appeal Same 540-776-0606 54u 537-.L173 540-776-2848 Same Hollins Size ofparcel(s): Acres: + 1. 9 AC. Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: C - 2 Residential (land use) REZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND WAIVER APPLICANTS (RJS/W) Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: SUP C- 2 Convience Store Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~x No; IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes XX No ' IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No_ V ARlANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TlVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIWIAA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to ofthe Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SfW v / AA RIS/W V / AA R/S/W V / AA E§ Consultation Eíi 8 1/2" X II" concept plan Application Metes and bounds description Justification Water and sewer application I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the o~' g or con ra of the owner. ./' §E Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners urchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent er's Signature 2 8-3 JUS TlFICA TlON FOR REWNING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR WAIVER REQUEST Applicant Vision Builders, LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms ofpublic health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 1. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The development of this ±15 acre tract as proposed by the concept plan would afford the North County area a unique shopping and dining opportunity. Peters Creek and Airport Roads, both major arterials intersect at this location. Fully developed this property (currently in land use) will no doubt provide the county much needed tax revenue. The developers are also proposing to donate approximately 6 acres to the county for a regional storm water detention pond. 2. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Roanoke County Community Plan as a mission statement under section six (6) states "to attract and retain to the county quality jobs and investment that diversify the economy, broaden the tax base, and provide long-term employment opportunities for area residents." We feel our master plan for this site comports with the mission statement and brings to fruit at ion the county's land use plan for this parcel. 3. Please describe the impact(s) ofthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The property in question is currently zoned C2, this SUP request is for a convience store at the southeastern portion of the property contigieous to Peter~s Creek Road. The site will be lowered ±25ft. below the current elevation of the adjouring properties. Appropriate screening & buffering will be proffered so as to mitigate any noise or site issues. We see little or no impact on basic county services. Water & Sewer are on the property. (See attached maps) 3 8-3 I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development ofthe property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staffmav exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS ---1L- a. Applicant name and name of development Date, scale and north arrow Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces ---1L- b. X c. X d. X e. X f. 2L g. X h. X 1. X J. Additional infom¡ation required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS -1L k. ---X-- I. X m. 2L n. X o. 2L p. -1L q. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule 'red in the checklist above are complete. ûc, -d-<-{ -O~ Date 6 / \/', , - - ---- --~ (si;!mI1hJ ¿II I .!WJDa"YA - WDa J!XiII:) S-az..rZd Ï ¡¡ ... ii ----- ~ ~ i M>.Q¡I ZI2.'£UTmON ~~ ~~ . I ~"'" ~~ t,)... ~..: t,)"'" ~:l ¡ ~ ~ ... ii i ~ ~ lÎ~ ~ m ~ I;¡ ... ii . ~ ~~ t,)"'" ~~ \ i ... ii ¡-.-. ... ... ! I '<t o o C\J a;- m .D E Q) > o Z ...... b C\J 0 J, ~ o ~ 8-3 ó z Iii ~ I- ~ -< 0 c 0 Iii ...J -< o UJ ~U"\:::E :;~o ~o->u ~NU ............CI.. ............z ~~o ~~~ z~3 O~@¡ J: -' CI.. <: :::E .:.; <: =? w => "" z 0 w ~ > N < ~ z z 20->5 ..,,,,0:: äS~5 :::E N ..,- ~§~ ~Qð ~Cl..0:: c.j(l) . 0::: CL.t..LJ -z C/)z C,.LJ < E--J -<'7- _(I) u~ 0>-< C/)t..LJ - C/»z -<0:::(3 ::::>0::: Z(l)- C,.LJcn> CO:::w C/) tj ::.:::: ~zo ~_z ~CJ< .....Jzo t..LJ0::: 6MP'WIIElJdlZ¡!:O\6UEI\LZ¡!:O\!:OOZ\'¡ 8-3 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION ApPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Pennit petition if new or additional infonnation is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to detennine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Pennit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Date 8-3 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: · Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units · Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) · Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash · Retail shop/Shopping center · Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) · Regional public facilities · Educational/Recreational facilities · Religious assemblies · Hotel/Motel · Golf course · Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic · Industrial site/Factory · Day care center · Bank · Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: · Development adjacent to/with access onto/within Soo-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) · For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly · When required to evaluate access issues · Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) · Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem · Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) · Substantial departure from the Community Plan · Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day 8-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,2005 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A CONVENIENCE STORE ON APPROXIMATELY 1.9 ACRES LOCATED AT 6044 PETERS CREEK ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 26.16-2-14) HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF VISION BUILDERS, LLC WHEREAS, Vision Builders, LLC has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate a convenience store on approximately 1.9 acres located at 6044 Peters Creek Road (Part of Tax Map No. 26.16-2-14) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 16,2005; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 26, 2005; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 23, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Vision Builders, LLC to operate a convenience store on approximately 1.9 acres located at 6044 Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. All building, including gas island canopy, exterior walls shall be brick, horizontal slate or vertical board and batten siding (materials shall be either wood, fiber cement or vinyl material) from grade to eave. 1 8-3 2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers, cupola or similar designs. 3. Colors used in all exterior building materials including the canopy will be subdued and will not be bright. 4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear, unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches. 5. Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy. 6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site. 7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet. 8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached. 9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument style not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feet in width, and shall be constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy. Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the building façade area. 10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet. 11. Dumpster - The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy. 12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00pm and 7:00am. 13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet wide along the entire length of the northeast property boundary. 2 8-3 14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site. 15. Building(s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet. 16. Hours of operation shall be between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m. 17. No access shall be allowed from Nover Avenue or Vivian Avenue. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 8-3 _AG3 .EP _AG1 2 AA _AV C1 .C:! / _ C2CVOD 11 ~ !~)j2 .PCD PRO .PTO L R1 ~ R:l ~ R:J ~ } WOe A ~<v 1"-! /"' R4 s~ 0 Street Center1ines '}-~ \ «>~ - Applicants Name: Vision Builders, LLC Existing Zoning: C-2 Proposed Zoning: C-2S Tax Map Number: 26.16-2-14 (portion of) Magisten"al District: Hollins Area: 1.9 Acres June 29, 2005 Scale: 1" ;;;; 400' Roanoke County Department of Community Development S-y PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: R. Fralin Development Corporation 16 - 8/2005 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 16, 2005 (Rescheduled from August 2, 2005) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 23, 2005 A. REQUEST To rezone approximately 9.95 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential to PRD Planned Residential Development with conditions to construct 60 town homes at a density not to exceed 6.1 units per acre located northwest of the corner of Newland Road and Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS The following eight citizens spoke in opposition to the request: Pat Hammond; Emily Hamilton; David Alderman; Virgil Decker; Christine Decker; Garland Chambers; Jayne Vest; Susan Quist. Two separate petitions were also presented opposing the project. The primary reason stated for opposing the request was extending Crosstimbers Trail which would add traffic, possibly reduce the amount of on-street parking currently enjoyed by Crosstimbers Trail residents and force children now playing in the street to seek safer play areas. The developer was asked to provide access from the proposed convenience store/gas station site via an extension of Airport Road. Sean Horne (Balzer & Associates) noted that such a scenario would involve the unrealistic construction of a bridge over the future regional stormwater management pond north of the proposed townhouse project. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Tim Beard presented the staff report focusing on requirements applicable to planned residential developments, the master plan for "Villas of the Valley", proposed site layout and architecture, neighborhood compatibility, public school impact, fire and rescue service delivery, the proposed adjacent regional stormwater management facility and traffic. Mr. McNeil asked if parallel (or other) parking would be prohibited on the project's private road system. Mr. Fralin stated that signage prohibiting such parking and fines for motorists who impede traffic would be utilized. Sean Horne explained that vehicular access options were studied in-depth at Crosstimbers Trail, Peters Creek Road and Newland Road. The developer is of the opinion that the optimum access alternatives are proposed. Mrs. Hooker asked if Newland Road could safely sustain traffic under this access design and Mr. Horne replied that it can for the "one-way" entrance proposed into the project site. Mr. Thomason and Mr. Azar suggested engineering a full access location from Newland Drive and doing away with access from Crosstimbers Trail altogether. Mr. Horne and Mr. Ford (Roanoke County Traffic Engineer) noted that grades required to make such an access functionally safe would be difficult, if not impossible without acquisition of additional (occupied) property uphill on Newland Drive. Although explored, no safe entrance/exit location from Peters Creek Road has been found. The entrance-only access proposed from 8-4 Newland Road is estimated to handle approximately 25 percent to 30 percent of total daily generated by the project. Mr. Azar inquired about the 45-foot maximum townhouse height stated in the master plan compared to elevation drawings also in the master plan. Mr. Fralin replied that maximum heights would probably not exceed 35 feet, but that in rare instances, two-story homes with walk-out basements may be taller when viewed from the rear yards. D. CONDITIONS 1) The property shall be developed in substantial compliance with document titled "Villas of the Valley, A Planned Residential Retirement Community" prepared by Salzer and Associates, Inc. dated June 24, 2005, revised July 12, 2005 and revised July 16, 2005. 2) Not more than 60 total residential units shall be constructed on this site. 3) A fee simple donation of property or a stormwater management easement for the creation of a regional stormwater management facility shall be granted to the County of Roanoke. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. Jarrell offered the petitioner a continuance to further explore access options in lieu of a motion to deny the request. Mr. Fralin asked for a vote. Mr. Jarrell made a motion to deny the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried 4-1. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mrs. Hooker G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 8-4 Petitioner: R. Fralin Development Corporation Request: To rezone approximately 9.95 acres from R-l, Low Density Residential District to PRD Planned Residential Development with conditions to construct a maximum of 60 townhomes Northwest of the intersection of Newland Road and Peters Creek Road Location: Magisterial District: Hollins Proffered/Suggested Conditions: 1. Substantial compliance with document titled "Villas of the Valley, A Planned Residential Retirement Community" prepared by Bal2;er and Associates, Inc. dated 6-24-2005, revised July 12, 2005, revised July 26, 2005. 2. Not more than 60 total residential units shall be constructed on this site. 3. The developer/contract purchaser shall make a fee simple donation of property toward the creation of a regional stormwater management facility. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This petition requests the rezoning of approximately 9.95 acres from R-l to Planned Residential. The applicant is proffering a maximum of 60 townhouse units within an overall master plan that preserves 40 percent of the total site area in open space. The proffered master plan includes home construction utilizing brick and vinyl exterior materials in natural earth tone colors. The number of school children projected to live in this development will be less than current zoning would project by an approximate 1:5 ratio. Also suggested is a proffer donating property that would provide a portion of a long-anticipated regional drainage facility. The overall site (made up of four contiguous parcels) is designated Neighborhood Conservation and Transition by the Roanoke County 2005 Community Plan. The proposed residential project is consistent with those designations. The main vehicular access to the proposed project is through existing Crosstimbers Trail; an "exit only" access onto Newland Road is also proposed, subject to Virginia Department of Traansportation approval. Staff supports the concept of a second access. However if that access is from Newland Road, an "enter only" one way drive should provide more safety and efficiency. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-47-5(B) of the zoning ordinance requires that all written and graphic infonnation submitted as part of a PRD rezoning request constitutes proffered conditions. Site plan review will be required. Commercial entrance pennit(s) will be required from the Virginia Department of Transportation. Local and state stonnwater management regulations are also applicable. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 8-4 Background - The largest of the subject properties has been developed at least since 1948 per county records. Currently one single family home, one accessory manufactured home and a series of outbuildings occupy most of the eastern portion of the site owned by James Wallace Cates II. Robert Fralin is the contract purchaser. Per master plan design guidelines, the development intent is to "offer a pedestrian scale neighborhood that will cater to the needs of Roanoke's retirement community. The project will also provide a natural transition between adjacent single family residences and commercially zoned property." A homeowners' association will be established for maintenance. TopographyNegetation-Most ofthe 9.95 acres is forested and includes steep topography facing downhill along the site's northeast border. The western half ofthe parcel is moderately sloped in the same direction. Elevations range approximately from 1060 feet to 1104 feet. Slope ranges vary from 10 percent and under on most of the southeast area of the site to 11 - 25 percent in the west central area to greater than 26 percent along the parcel's north and east boundaries. Surrounding Neighborhood - The subject tracts are bordered by R-l zoned single family residential homes to the south and west, the R-3 zoned Waterford townhouse development on the northwest, an undeveloped C-2 zoned tract now under consideration for retail uses and R-l zoned single family homes east across Peters Creek Road. 3. ANAL YSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout! Architecture - 60 Townhouses and private road access are proposed for the central and southeast portions of the overall 9.95 acres resulting in a density of 6.1 units per acre. No more than seven abutting townhouse units shall be grouped together per block with no more than two units having the same building line. Exterior materials shall include a mixture of brick and vinyl siding. Natural earth tones shall be used for all vinyl siding with complimentary brick and trim colors. Perimeter vegetative buffering is slated for the entire site with the north and northwest sections to remain as green open space. Sidewalks and walking trails are proposed. One vehicular access from publicly-maintained Crosstimbers Trail in the west central portion of the site is proposed. One-story townhouse units are planned at a minimum building size of 1,150 square feet (including garage) and two-story units will comprise at least 1900 square feet. All units will be at least 22 feet wide and not more than 45 feet high. Utilities shall be installed underground and exterior lighting shall be post-mounted not to exceed 10 feet in height. Public Schools - School age children generated by this development would attend Glen Cove Elementary, Northside Middle and Northside High Schools. Glen Cove Elementary has a current enrollment of 475 (500 potentially by the fall, 2005) with a maximum capacity of 600 children. Northside Middle School's current enrollment is 750 children with an approximate capacity of 800 students. Northside High is at capacity with its existing enrollment of 1050 students. All figures are per individual school staff. Based on the housing type proffered, approximately 0.2 school child per dwelling unit is projected yielding a total of 12 school children at completion of the development. Access/Traffic Circulation & Generation - VDOT staff reports that the posted speed limit on Crosstimbers Trail (VA 1438) is 25 miles per hour and that minimum sight distance for an entrance is 280 feet. An estimated 600 trips per day could be generated by the 60 townhouses. A Newland Road or Peters Creek Road connection would need to be evaluated for items such as sight distance and turn lanes. An excessive number of vehicle trips on Crosstimbers Trail could impact roadway width and pavement structure. The plat for Section 3 of The Woodlands notes 2 8-4 that "segments of turnaround outside the 50-foot RfW of Crosstimbers Trail shall revert to adjoining owners when street is extended." If the proposed street extension is to be private, the existing cul-de-sac and its right-of-way would need to remain as is. A commercial entrance permit will be required. Balzer & Associates (representing the petitioner) estimates maximum traffic generation at 390 trips per day based on approximately six trips per residential unit. The Crosstimbers Trail access was planned for in developing the Woodlands subdivision and a 50-foot right-of-way was platted to allow future access to the subject property. As reported by the Roanoke County traffic engineer, Crosstimbers Trail's 2003 vehicle count was 1,700 trips per day. Road width narrows from approximately 40 feet at the Woodhaven Road intersection to about 28 feet near the access point to the proposed development. Many Crosstimbers Trail residents parallel park on both sides of the street, narrowing the traveled way substantially. Restricting parking to one side of the road where width is minimal may be needed. If nearly a third again of existing traffic is added to Crosstimbers Trail, property owners will be negatively impacted. In regard to the proposed private road(s) associated with this project, Roanoke County is in an extension period recognized by VDOT on possible revisions to the county ordinance that could prohibit private roads, including those in Planned Residential Developments. It is noted that sidewalks are proposed and, in that regard, a five-foot wide sidewalk or walking trail would be desirable. Also heavy load-bearing capacities of vehicles such as trash trucks should be accounted for when designing pavement structure and a turnaround for such vehicles should be shown. Fire & RescuelUtilities - Emergency vehicle travel distance for the Hollins Fire & Rescue Squads will be 1.8 miles using the Crosstimbers Trail access. Fire Department staff also states that cluster type development per building and fire codes should not significantly impact services. Public water and sanitary sewer are available by extension of existing lines. Stormwater Management - Staff has requested (per proffer) and the petitioner has expressed a willingness to make a fee simple donation to Roanoke County of floodway and floodplain property along the northeast boundary ofthe subject site towards the creation of a regional stormwater management facility. This future regional stormwater management pond would help relieve downstream drainage and flooding problems along the West Fork of Carvin Creek, particularly along Dent Road, Williamson Road, Vemdale Road and Palm Valley Road. Community Meeting - A community meeting was held on July 18, 2005. Approximately 40 citizens attended. The predominant concerns expressed were additional traffic onto Crosstimbers Trail (the only access proposed at that time) and to a lesser extent, proposed building density. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Community Plan has designated the eastern one-third of the site Transition (paralleling Peters Creek Road) and the remainder Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation policy encourages conservation ofthe existing development pattern in addition to attached and detached residential housing at a "reasonable density not significantly higher than the existing neighborhood." Greenways, bike and pedestrian trails should be included and cluster developments are encouraged. Infill development that complements existing land uses are also encouraged. 3 8-4 Transition policy advocates orderly development of highway frontage tracts. Although generally more applicable to commercial areas, single-family attached residential uses such as planned townhouse communities of six or more units per acre are encouraged. The proposed project is consistent with each designation. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed "Villas of the Valley" provides a development configuration that suits the existing topography and preserves 40 percent of green space on the 9.95 acre site. A proffered density of 6.1 units per acre is slightly higher than a conventionally developed single family detached neighborhood, but far less that the number of units permitted under the open space bonus density allowance provided for in PRD regulations. The proposal offers an opportunity to mitigate longstanding stormwater management problems in the general area as well as provide appropriate infill development. If the additional daily traffic load projected for Crosstimbers Trail can be mitigated by constructing at least one additional public vehicular access at either Peters Creek Road or Newland Road, the proposal would be strengthened. Reiterating, county staff supports - subject to VDOT approval- an "enter only" access point on Newland Road in lieu of the "one way out driveway" indicated on the master plan graphic. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: 16 - 8/05 PC: 08/02/05 BOS: 08/23/05 4 8-4 July 29, 2005 We, the residents of Brooklawn subdivision, respectfully submit our names in opposition to the proposed optional entrance from Newland Road into the planned development proposed between Newland and Airport Road, "Villas of the Valley," The main area of concern is the safety of existing and new homeowners when trying to exit onto Peters Creek Road from Newland Road. Typically, in severe weather, because of the steepness of the hill on Newland, it is usually 3 to 4 days before a snowplow will attempt to plow the street. During times of severe weather, vehicles traveling down the hill from Brooklawn have no way to stop once started down the hill. This currently is a very unsafe situation for current residents trying to exit Brooklawn without sliding into Peters Creek Road blindly, The additional number of cars would at least triple the risk current residents already are facing, not to mention the potential hazard to new homeowners who would be as risk of being hit. Printed Name .£J#¿¿- /(, ~~ , IJ ~'fJ to. ÍaLf;t ¡JíC(~1L- tU, [c;-.5-t: \ ' '\ {ß /¡i c¿.~/-eCj~o' r~~~ /J~~ , ., f' . "'(~ ~uI¿n ~¿/Ad ~(lÆl1d()i1 ,Kc\ f'r J .' 1/. )) /;1 ({). J ( nú-·¿l _ . A 0(2 J' f.¡i/2/è . /1 /J /~ ¿ -6 ~~<:.. ~~~'" '- ,"'Y,,\ ±:. \:'~--~'::'~\/\ t/~ rf IttMl l' l; /~~ PfJíflJ . ~IIJ' LU1 J>tnJ Æ JI í;{Il/~ Wi! L Ùm Lea k-e 8-4 ~~JÚ i;JJk' ~ J tj-j _..), {/r,1n '. '''~''V /'\ C\ t~«. C CU~.AU.JJ- .~7~ ~~ ~ 7í1. /- '. ~~~, ~i 5.4 þ( úJ¡(~._K-//'u.sò/0 [1,4' ell TI-f-f µ~4J ~1J Ghe.t&eP... L. Ci-,Clfìne..\\ ()~.-~~ ~ (r-~~-.e ~ . . (.J .~ /¡//lXI tile uJ¡:; ,e R.e;J- Id c.uer<-'S 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning COllli11ission to deny the request by R. Fralin Developl11ent Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Trail at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be necessary to insure the , safety of our residents. 12. 13. 14. 'Té:')JL 72?7 C€2C1;:~"'tWVlØZ~'-\~ '-7" /.. ':¡" -"., IÅ 2,. (" ¡ r..t)<?J(:.~'2ð() ,,. , ,. ( . ' 1'2- -: -¿ L01.~)\,e_.~f Or ¡ ..;C l C{ ~. c(20S:5ìirf"rr5tP,S t" t (12 ~Slfj-¡~l-¡ l)tf'tfL-) 4'S ¿:: ~:2 /(ý~.~(':~.');·-:~5·'~ 2lv5"~(ð-j(i~ . .r.:¡;';'2>-8r?~ '36:, Z.- ) ~'-C}~ ~~ -C¡Ö3 ~7 5-27..1 017 S 2l- Z Ml 5 ¿,. 3··· '-/ t.j <f L( ", ", ~2 l ~ l I"" "') t., "-') ....- !'1 !), I,'"> .,' _. ~. I it;", Þ)fu1j-6 C) U,' .' '1, ,:((J,r.~ , ; /11 rJ ;/ I~ ¡J:i :;::5? ,... ~f ,J, i2. ,. . /j.,/., )f) L;/ -5 <.y< - - --U'41 i( ..;)(t;2...- ....J..- ) {(f~l55 J~>I/I be(') '1-". 5[3" '(3 S .:;-- 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning Conm1ission to deny the request by R. Fralin Development Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Trail at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be necessary to insure the ("IF').f,c,,+.....r ......£' ___..... _......_..: ...1____L_ ADDRESS PHONE 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning Conl1llission to deny the request by R. Fralin Development Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Trail at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be necessary to insure the safety of our residents. '''''''"';''''''''';''?~'" ",...,..--.,-.. PHONE I. 7, 8. ~Ç""G :J - 9/ $" .- 6G~ 2 f/6 Ç-6 J --I (,21 L/V ~~l.'~~ "f .3 I -- 08~ 2-J....~ - LOßcl '"3(,.4..-f1L/ Y ~- ¿1d-I<,., 31.o,~ - 5 ;).~' ;). 3(;, (7 - 8G89 { '" 24. :!5. 19. 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning Commission to deny the request by R. Fralin Development Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Tråil at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be necessary to insure the safety of our residents. ,. .__.., _, ._'.. .,..- ,·;_,__",;_""~,,,""~"_i"'~~:·"--'-'· ,,~,;.--\- "--'"~'"".,,-~,,""'''~:·I'I'~.''~:.'''''-<''''''''·'~'or:-n'''''''''~f''''-'';~~ "''''''.~1,,,,..~'',~t.'II...~r~':1:''1ÜI'!\;~'1;.,-f'''-·'·,,,,,,-·,; 5lPS· {l! 5 ç;' ft:;:3 -¡ y., ç 5· (i~!¿;';i'j1 '1r~~ Cn.> ~ ~ \. '^" \UL fj \ r. '"562... ~ 9~'3 <, 10'\";'-'1 .)~b~ \).)~ 3(.'- gj:ç7 - - (I ~3bc;¡_'.Jt4~ ~ ') - '-('-I' () :)U)~_· ... ð c' f" i~ .JJ'-- -1 tr;rL t),¡ r ,;. '-rc -112 , C f\,("/lð-i;'.v¿'~,-<Þ 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning Commission to deny the request by R. Fralin Development Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Trail at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be necessary to insure the _....J:",..,+...~ _+ _......_ __M~...:I__f-M NAME ADDRESS I. L.,C, ßI'VeJ\S II (;t Cros~~m/~JlJ 7rL . 2.·K' ~ ßèG~ 71 31 t~ ~&:'7:;[' RJ) 3.1/~ å?Jf7f 1a:2(p (Wrl? FVrLs PL <1'~1.11 r'àYL .f:n¿'--PLcrfJ- 1,13;) 'f LÙ J Y") (ó-c k:-s D ~' s r, " 5 ~Tt ( T r" w..,~ n'-l~ ¡,;".. ~~ 6.~l·' e~G t ~efrl '1J.TW¡N pv{\L<; Ðf. . I, i,;,7.&~f"~tt~:;rn~~!~··IT<f1 Cm\:\~v\.£be¡(\ l' R , ' ,(,- '.'k'û,,:. !.,"! --\"' j , A \ !"1 I '1 'I \ L....J (; H'\ I, IW V"I. I J 0 ii! (/,1)5~ h,Þl1 )'¡?4'-S '-r;- , 9.!I).' ,~~ H-L \J)(~ ')~ "10l{ () CrÛ1<J·t ¡ rfìt>WY:J 'ly~ . ,::: r' r. ( ·7' '7 'r) 11.. , .' , 10. . ./ .12;'_'" Lr· .~ ef:. (;, \.../¡ (,-,9 .-¡' fr' hr" i ..-:-- /1 ""1 . -' .- II. '/;::y~,. c: c/èð ' " ""7dc/Q C¿C?'£r77~:j:~/?f.zç-;,;p 12, .- f ; fY). 5ra (oCf3l.( j-Ù~'01~' VJ oòi L¡\J 13.-1 ~Ÿ¡/11;of{.tf\ {ól?C~ A-ü~'Or'í\(\\AjCCC\ L.N -"'14.. ~" - "'.ha ( /1- '7 CìtY5';S~7¡i'd1,.q/S; j tr, ' 'J' ¡ //7/- ~/a / Ôj.,·--¿J l, J. ',. '-lJ 1\ .,.. «- . (~ 25 0' i '. ~ U ¡¡:;C¡)l)] ill ¿J ,7.. II i/. ( 'J . (\" '(,' ,-6dE' ;;r,~) 'lfJ' . It ;.,~.. ~ - ,.. 1 ~i . 17. PHONE .3 (0 ;;1 - 8'£1 S-S- 3b<--OI0~ 3&)' d.-1Ò-c¿ ;;2i.JJ5 -:")5;10 &è:,~ <"" aú%: :> ~ l - Ó '7 l. L -s-al-ðO Vl 3C,,;l ~ If' c I- '3lo ¿ S I., I'D Z6 )/ 0--b 10 :~2". J 6/6 c..3~ (0 -1 ltJ (.a I "3Le L,~ Î (-12. ('-º_ , Z to. 5-~-' (]UZ-ð /!l.-1.,:) ~'I'{?:<-Z:l ,.2 I:f' - . 1-/, ~Y;jr;; - [J7t.IC)' 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27- 28. 29. 8-4 We, the undersigned residents of the Woodlands and living either on or adjacent to, Crosstimbers Trail, do hereby petition the Roanoke County Planning Commission to deny the request by R. Fralin Development Corporation to extend Crosstimbers Trail at the 7300 block, where it now ends in a cul-de-sac. We believe such action to be neceSSalY to insure the safety of our residents. ADDRESS 7Dft1 ~M5~ltJIl(¡4 ~&ill ~,,1,'t{1 '""IN"", C""'y...,.J;~"s \r"~ \ .. , dj 7. ]'t/[:· Z j:{} 'f ,:~ip :) - ~Â ~[î If 11. ..,'".,..'r._....~·...,.,"-_·~-'-~ 14. 15. 20. 21. ,.', S"b 3 - TÝ3 Ù 8-4 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use OnI Received by: 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX 776-7155 Application fee: PC~ date: Placards issued: BOS date: Check type of application filed (check all that apply) XI Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance o Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address whip R. Fralin D8velopment Corporation P. O.Box 6244 Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No.: *381-9700 293-3234 i81 3871 II Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Road & Magisterial District: H 011 ins Tax Map No.: 26.¿0-04-01.00 2.00 Community Planning area: Ho 11 i ns Existing Zoning: R - 1 Proposed Zoning: PRO Proposed Land Use: esidential Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ex No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes IX No 0 Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): Appeal ofInterpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY 0 F THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SIW V/AA R/SIW V/AA R/SIW V/AA ~ Consultation §i 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan EE Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either llie owner of the property or llie own's agent or contract purchaser and am acting willi the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 8-4 l~-;~'>-i?\ - i1~, '~ i_:i:,!~~~~ièiÙt: ,~â-ç-; ~~i:-.~:&!;~~:1}i1~>i~~-~~~~~~:~X(~~;~Ú~~~~~~~;;~,-~,X:-~",~_ ~~~~-::: - :: j Applicant R. Fralin Development Corporation The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 1. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes ofthe Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district cl~ssification in the Zoning Ordinance. This project furthers the PRO Section of the zoning ordinance by providing a variety of housing that meets the need of many in Roanoke County. It takes advantage of the flexibility found in the PRO Section by utilizing the buildable area of the site and preserving the remaining 40% of the site in green space. This project will provide a superior living environment to the resident~ of this community. 2. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. This area is designated as Transition and Neighborhood Conservatior. This project is in compliance with this designation because it provides a natural transition between the existing single family properties and the commercially zoned properties along Peters Creek Road. The project is also being developed at a density already allowed by R-1 zoning. 3. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. This project will have less impact on public services than a normal development of this density. The nature of the. development suggests that fewer than normal school children ~ill be living in the development thus. greatly reducing the impact on schools and parks. This project will have the normal impact on public utlities of any residential development of this size. Water and sewer availability has been confirmed. The adjoining woodland subdivision will see the most impact from traffic, however our connection to Cross Timbers Trail was accounted for i ht of wa . 3 8-4 A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff ma exem t some of the items or su est the addition of extra items, but the followin are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development Date, scale and north arrow Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces ----2L b. ~ c. X d. ~ e. X f X g. X h. X 1. X J. Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS --.L k. --L 1. --L m. X n. --L o. --X- p. ..L q. Existing utilities (water, sewer, stonn drains) and connections at the site Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I~~' "qui",¡ in th, "'~kli" ,boy, '" <omplot<. Signature of applicant 6- Z~""~ Date 6 8-4 Community Development . Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDMSION W AIVE~ PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL ûSE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION ,ApPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Plamúng Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,. Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition ifnew or additional informa.tion is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners presênt at the scheduled public bearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an .outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.. This. continuance shall allow sufficíen.t time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new 01' additional information and provide written comments and. suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine ifa continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning. Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use PemlÎt petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic ÌInpact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses. and situations that would necessitate further study is pravided as ]Ja1't of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient rime for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate: the required tmffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Comwission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Roí:HA] P Mft-L'ft'\J h,ol If!... lIJ/H..--LN DE-i/5t.o(.'VI-i/i.Jr (ù.Z<,;J, Name of PetitIOn ·~~l.Âo1r ( ~r¡'-' //"o:.-!(.·~I Petltiaaer"$ Signature I ~:r /~ )'- Date £13/£0 39\1d S31\1I~OSS~~l\1a 0g08ZLL0þg Þ£:00 gØ0Z/8Z/90 07/25/2005 04:45 5407728050 BALZER&ASSOCIATES PAGE 02/02 8-4 Legal Description for Tax Map Parcel Number 026.20-04-01.00 Beginning at a point now within the right-of-way of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) at the northeasterly corner of Lot 16, Brooklawn (Plat Book 3, Page 99), being the southeasterly corner of James Wallace Cates II (Deed Book 294, Page 48, Tax Map #026.20-04-01.00- 0000); thence with the easterly line of Lot 16 534 °09'50'W, 322.48 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of Newland Road (Route 1825), thence N46°10'40"VV, 91.49 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 239.99 feet, an arc distance of 143.57 feet, and a chord bearing N63°18'50" W, 141.43 feet to a point at the southwesterly corner of Lot 14, Brooklawn; thence 1eaving the right-of-way line of Newland Road and continuing with the westerly line of said Lot 14 N9°33'00'W, 200.00 feet to a point on the southerly line of James Wallace Cates II (Will Book 61, Page 1071); thence with the southerly line of Cates and Lots 13, 12, 11 & 10, Brooklawn, N80027'W, 429.09 feet to a point at the northerly corner of Lots 9 & 10, Brooklawn and the easterly corner of Lot 15, liThe Wood lawns" Section 3(Plat Book 9, Page 55); thence with the northeasterly line of Lots 15 and 16 liThe Woodlawn" and the line of Strauss Development Corporation (Plat Book 16, Page 9) N31°33'E, 730 feet to a point at the southwesterly corner of Strauss Development Corporation (Plat Book 22, Page 153); thence with Strauss (Plat Book 22. Page 153) and the property of Jesse N. Jones, Jr. (Will Book 57, Page 454) N68°59'W 1465.3 feet to a point now being in the right-of-way of Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117); thence N39°30'E , 297.3 feet to the point of beginning containing 11.58 acres and being Lots 14, 15 & 16 Brooklawn (Plat Book 3, Page 99) and the property of James Wallace Cates II (Will Book 61, Page 1071, Tax Map #026.20- 04-01.00-0000). LESS AND EXCEPT right-ot-way taken by Commonwealth of Virginia along Peters Creek Road, State Route 117 as shown on plans entitled "Roanoke County & City of Roanoke from: Int. Rte 11 (North of Roanoke) to: Int. Rte. 460 (In City ot Roanoke)". lØ/lØ 39~d PETITIONER: REQUEST: PROPERTY: 8-4 PROFFERED CONDITIONS R. Fralin Development Corp. (Conn-act Purchaser) Rezoning from R-I Residential to PRD Planned R~sidentia} PROPERTY OWNER: JaIT1¢$ Wallace Cates, (I 9.95 acrc=S - Tax Map #26.20-4-1,2,3,4 The followil'ig ilre proffered conditions for the abov~ referenced rezoning request: 1. 2. 3. The property shall be developed in substantial compliance with document tided "Villas of the Vaney, A Plan~ Residential Retirement Community" prepared by Balzer and Associates, inc. dated June 24, 2005, revised July 12,2005, revised July 16, 2005. Not more than 60 total residential units shall be constructed on this site. A f~e simple donation of property or a stormwater management easement for the creation of a regional stonnwater management facility shall be granted to the County of R.oanoke. Petitioner I Contract Purchaser: Itk4U Robert P. Fralin I R. Fralin Development Corp. G .... S31~I30SS~~~3Z1~ 139138lLLØÞO::; ~~:77 C~~7/CT/cn 8-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005 ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 9.95 ACRES FROM R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO PRD, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS, TO CONSTRUCT 60 TOWNHOMES AT A DENSITY NOT TO EXCEED 6.1 UNITS PER ACRE LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE CORNER OF NEWLAND ROAD AND PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 26.20-4-1, 2, 3, AND 4), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF R. FRALIN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 2005, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23,2005; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 16, 2005; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 9.95 acres, as described herein, and located northwest of the corner of Newland Road and Peters Creek Road (Tax Map Numbers 26.20-4-1,2,3, and 4) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of PRD, Planned Residential Development. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of R. Fralin Development Corporation. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1 8-4 (1) The property shall be developed in substantial compliance with document titled "Villas of the Valley, A Planned Residential Retirement Community" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated June 24,2005, revised July 12, 2005 and revised July 26,2005. (2) Not more than 60 total residential units shall be constructed on this site. (3) A fee simple donation of property or a stormwater management easement for the creation of a regional stormwater management facility shall be granted to the County of Roanoke. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map Nos. 26.20-4-1,2,3, and 4 containing approximately 9.95 acres 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 Planning and Design Documents for: VILLAS OF THE VALLEY A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ROANOKE COUNTY, VA HOLLINS MAGESTERIAL DISTRICT Prepared for: R. Fralin Development Corporation P.O. Box 6244 Christiansburg, VA 24068 Prepared by: Balzer and Associates, Inc. 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Project # R0500134.00 Date: June 24th, 2005 Revised July lih 2005 Revised July 26th 2005 REFLECTING TOMORROW 8-4 Balzer and Associates I 8-4 Table of Contents: I. Table of Contents Page 2 II. Introduction Page 3 III. Vicinity Map Page 4 IV. Site Summary Page 5 V. Existing Conditions Map Page 7 VI. Slope Analysis Map Page 8 VII. Site Design Guidelines Page 9 VIII. Architectural Requirements Page 12 IX. Master Plan Rendering Page 13 X. Architectural Renderings Page 14 XI. Adjacent Property Owners Page 16 Balzer and Associates 2 8-4 VILLAS OF THE VALLEY DESIGN GUIDLINES INTRODUCTION Villas of the Valley is a 9.95 acre Planned Residential Development located at the intersection of Newland Road and Peters Creek Road in Roanoke County, Virginia. The intent of the project is to offer a pedestrian scale neighborhood that will cater to the needs of Roanoke's retirement community. This project will also provide a natural transition between the adjacent single family residences and commercially zoned property. The housing provided will be a mixture of one and two story townhomes, most of which provide master bedrooms on the first floor. Many of the units will have attached garages on the main level. The home sizes, including the garage, will vary from 1,150 sf for one level homes, up to 1,480 sf for two level homes. The site layout clusters the townhomes to allow for greater preservation of open space. The project will include such amenities as sidewalks, a walking trail and gazebo while maintaining a minimum of 40% of open space on site. Balzer and Associates 3 Vicinity Map: 8-4 ROANh¡{rE -I Site Location Indicated in Black above, adjacent to Peters Creek Road. Balzer and Associates 4 8-4 VILLAS OF THE VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES SITE SUMMARY Site Data The site consists of tax parcel #'s 26.20-04-01.00 (8.77ac.), 26.20-04-02.00 (0.215 ac.), 26.20-04-03.00 (0.497ac.), and 26.20-04-04.00 (0.471ac.). The total site area is 9.953 acres. The current zoning is R-l and would currently allow up to 75 units under the by right lot line option. Existing Conditions The site consists of 25% open areas and 75% wooded areas. There are two existing residences with associated out buildings on the property that will be removed. The site has slopes on the property ranging from 1 % to 50+ %. West Carvins Creek and associated floodplain runs through the northern side ofthe property. Adjacent Properties Adjacent properties to the north are undeveloped R-3 lots and a property zoned C- 2 which is currently used as a single-family residence. The property to the west consists of an undeveloped R-3 lot and the adjacent Woodlands subdivision. Eastern properties are zoned R-l with single-family residential lots along Newland Road. The southern portion of the property fronts on Peters Creek Road. Preservation Area The development of this property will be limited to the flatter areas of the site. By limiting the development to the flatter portions, this project provides a design that is both sensitive to the needs of the retirement community and to that of the existing environmental ecosystems. By preserving the existing steep slopes, floodplains and woodlands, there will be less of an impact on the existing wildlife and natural habitat. The total preserved area will be a minimum of 40% of the total site area. Balzer and Associates 5 8-4 Buffer Yard A 15' buffer yard shall be established along the southern property line to help reduce any minimal impact this project may have on the adjacent homeowners. A 25' building setback will be in place along the northern property line, along with a 30' front yard along Peters Creek Road and Newland Road Utilities Both water and sewer are available to the property and have been con finned with the WVW A. The water service will be provided by extending an 8" water line from a 10" water main located at the northern property line. There is an existing blow off valve on site where the connection will be made. The sewer service will be provided by extending an 8" sewer line from the sewer main located in the northwestern portion or the property. Both water and sewer services and easements will be designed and installed in accordance with the WVW A standards. Access Access to the property will be through the end of Crosstimbers Trail that currently serves the Woodlands Subdivision. A second exit only connection to Newland Road is also proposed subject to VDOT approval. The maximum traffic generation from this site will be 390 trips per day based on 6 trips per residential unit. The trip generation infonnation is based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The access point of Crosstimbers Trail was planned for in the development of Woodlands Subdivision and a 50 ft. Right of Way was platted with the subdivision to allow future access to this property. Balzer and Associates 6 ó ( /- _.":'-""'\ . '... \ \, -- ~ '. I /:<:. /(/ 1//?;¿¿;;/~~~";;'</~:'-"-::~~-<0'-</ / J ')''<'', '\\'l<;'1~'~--' ',~I 0'(" ....' I \ '. . .... \ : I', . / '111,//' '-"'/',/>:.-..:0 g.:-;~j / ), I/}I I),: /1 \ '-'. r 7, i: '.,}--" _ .'_' _ !. '.. ~\..... \,.' I .' /./ ,/ /// //;/ ¡0Ç~; :.~::~~:::; ¿. .:=;::.-::::~ ..~.../ ¡ / / I" ((I ):' " ¡ I'· ,,) . - .:. \ \ ~.." -~~- \ i . ./.. / \ (ill' / " , . '/:. :--=-~: .:::::-::::.... -- '~::::'::--,-;- "<~:-.,-,._- ,,,/ )) \.. " I \ '" \ - '\ '-. '.. " . ,. ) I S J f J ;" { ¡'" ( \ ----. ~::.:.- -~--..:~~-"\ & .........\ \ -.... 0.. ~~ \' ,J l ¡ \ J " \ , ") ì ... , .', \ I' ' , " "... ---,,- --.... ", 21 "'-. \ \ \ >- --..','.. \ " \ '" " I', f\") ¡ '... \ J", \, \, 1j. \ \\\ IÀ ~_~__~_....~...., \" 'P"§ .. \ ", ; '\ ~ (. .: /.... ') ( \. \ ',\ \ '" I ,')- '.,.:' I \ \. ¡,\ \\ \ \ '.. ~ '\\'\\\ \k....::..::-·-," ::::.<,.., ',..<,,,, \ \. \. '1\ '. ì '\ ' ('/>/) ( \ ~.:":( \ ~,,'" " '. \ ~~-~""- ....,....... ì \ \\.:·CJ.~\\"~;?,a':;:·'·'\~\\\'~·I.c-- .---,<..:~...~\>~\\ 'n \ \ I '\\'"'.lÍ'~/ ( ", j '~\ ' ~' " ", '-.... 0 ì \ ~ ,"'", '~,. ~.' '''.\ \\,~" .'....\ \ \ \1 \X\ \ \ ¡ I II ì)1 , '. l J', " ,-\-(, - " ,) ""\ ~ \ ~." \ ,.'~\ % ~ . . \ . \, . \\,.,~.....-". ~ ---. '..... \ \ \ \....~ l \ \ 1 ~ / / /,.... í l; , ' \ '1 I ~ .... , .' ~"~r \ (j ....... . " \ ......... ........ \ '.. \ \ \ I \ I J.~i:!í/ I I ~\ 0~j j,-< ':I..'~·': \ -1"<~,ll1~, "''i.. 1-'·"""';~1)/1. '/..>k',\ ~:.. ~\\'\%i:~·ï:::--.:~,··2;'< '·~·~tk.;.::~=·_-,---\W"·\ \.~\') ))) j ¡ II j ~ ~~:a~/"jS ;\1/ .~. ,\ 'I,'.... I' ",>-, ,'. 7-. \', ',,' q,,;\, '-~·-..,-ä ~~'o 'I _~ " ;:1, I II ''''~~,,// jlr~ ':.-< J J<,' i '~, {( 0' '. \'V-)\.. '¡ ... II ..,.\ ,?>....:'jI¡ \ =t \, ~, ') I i / !! (/ / /¡ .//11 I /1 / if~ -' ~ .~)¡'f)3 / \... ¡ ¡', LA""" .'>~ f, \ ~ .,\ ,~ ~ \ /'" ¡ . J i ! / j j / .' i ! J / / 1/ III . !): -- . . .' I l\ i ,(. ;)' .' f , ~! \ I !', .: \ J '~./ I J i \ -- I 'i I.' 1.1 /,1 i / / I II" I ,~,\~ ª' /1? /,') ./ " ·r; /: ." '''.''.\ "'\. , ,.~.~ I ~ I I Ii, 11,1 I /': /,1 I /. 1\\ '\\ ill. 1.( '/,) ..' (", ! I '~t Yl' .. \ V,.... . l f" r / ' I I I f J I J /, I I \ \ \ \ I I \ ..-) / ;' ,~>'..Jj--/ i /.......~ " '\--:.' ',,_ ,§¡;¡.--i:J.~.' '-" _ \ í-A-rr I ! I i I II I/! / 'I' I: / ¡ f /' I¡I\\\ \ '\'~ ' . '.' . / '",,' ~' "\'. ---. j!!ZI:;* ~ '. rVl;.""" I I I I· I ) I II \ \ '~ . ~ .:' i.' .--..- "-\",~ /! :!'-<-~~, \ .. "-J1, '. ~~ -- -=-.~~ -: ),J.--< ' /, ,.-' I / i .',... / / .I :' / /1/: J/ i 1/ / I, I, I j¡!!' \ \/'..('" :-"oì , í" '~b....-~!:"n't<\ .-<" E!~ T '~,--<" I I /" -/1, J './1' ,/ I J I // J'/I' '/ , \) 8 g1 . .,' .~'. -; ,1( ,t!:~~r~\\..l~~(·\.. ,:L~ ·'Jtr //~/,/> I <::··~;::.'í!;>~:,::·:/(/>l/ //// )JI:/t(~;, /!I'/!\~~ V¥: -'. -- , ~ ~~ ~~. ~- '->\ ,,\-ÿ-,:..-ç-r/ . !!-ºj~ 5,~///1 //...//.I//,I///~ I í /,//ï//, (', ,- ,~ ~')'''' '\ / ~ ",.1(,." "'/1' ./.' ...:! i'~ ;. /71' 1/('1". s-::; :::,:-:"/.".»,./ <~/ !.t'// I II 1'1 ,) ,. :. . . \ "" '1' 'f; /1 , 't' .;1...... :'):'.' ,/./,/ 7 /,,' ~/ 1/ ~ \.... {(f=-==::~:."¿"':~.::::""~'::...::::::"~~"'"/ / / / / I . I ')'. 1fi1~ , ~., il. ',. -ñ.' II 1.1 . .'.'.' I ..' /1 If: 1 \\\\,.....(.-....;_.;:;.__:_...M_..._...;~;~::...,.~// /).. 1~ I~ ... " " \/' .' /" <.Aot~ .. /1' i I ... : ../ / / /, ,I: I· ,.y,~~~\\~!~~¿,::;~_::;:.~:f i /, j 'I' J J ¡')" ,f { I· . '. ,\ ~ þ' " /ON'-2\ '. \_:( !. . ..... /,' " I .':' I I ,'; i ':'\ .,':. " - < ~'(,,/':>///!. 1/ jl) 'v í ') I ... .' .:. ... \ . _..r:!.....?,--. ........ç::.; ./ ... j'~9'¡¡¡ "',.... ~-;í: " /./ ,/ /' ,/ / / / / i ; Iii I! í ! \ "ì'\'-\~\ -"~::'::::'\\\ - /" -' A if.) {\ 'II .'.,-': . .-."- , '\ -c¡·'~;?::.ill--· ~,,- ,". '.' ~~.~:z. ¥,/ (\:,:7:/ ....../ ,....... //./ / /1' ! (/ ! d! " I :J i \ \ '\ \····I\\)~\'\~~\(\ / J (I'I f,.., ~ III/{ I , " ; ",.\<::::.:::"'" i ..... '" "'.6 i\--Þ ,) ... ' i /" I : ¡ I I ' I ·1 ".. I 1;'\\ I', I,) ',," () / ' . . \ ~'-- . " " ¡'...."" ¡¡¡....,..., (;1 ' /,. / I . .' / .I / ! I ! ! I I' [ I I \] I / Ii' \ r Æ ; x- J , -0 /0" <.":". .-...:\';í-:'<'" :':-'/~' ~·~i~¡-'</.Jl~,;'.·//~ li/.'»; ,//./ ¡ii! ! ;, )! j / j.~ /A/.~/I /'/'/1 (, .j ~]! j \ (/ ft.¡ .,r--'--.---.j .. ,~-l,~~.~;;;;~,/:'-:<--:}::// /.:...r' :"//~"/..///J' .. / ./,/ /)///1/// i ,~~ I V. I Xl -'-'''-ì~~;Ï /IIJ)1 ¡ 4-~~ ~'~:.;. --.' ,/(."" ,-·----Ø~)1·· "/....'" ~ 11.-/ "./ / // / / / ,/ 1 / / 1 / ¡II~'J: i I Y /)1..... lilt ~\1115 '" . -'- :- "~---.- ',>:':';;;'-- .,' - ". ..' .,' ---- ",/ /,/ . /' .' / I,.,... /.'.'" 1,/ .... / I ,I I I I j" .,Þ!.~~Æ~' I!' ", II' I ' \. \ . _ ;0. .~_ ~- .'~' ..' ~ .,~ ~. ~. I . 1 / .'. 1 I J 1,1 / I I r.ß I II'" ... 1 I, ) no . ,,-- u"u-_..- ,,/ /"1/ , ,- /' ., . ',1, / /, . / / / ' I I ) ('" , I) .\ I' .,,~ I ' \ .... ". ·1···:·······/·:·· ......; ...··~.~/..C1N 0> ~"""':4 ..... ..~~"'./ .'~ .///.../..../~...../J/ ,., ",' ~/. ///1// I /7i:~ ,) , \ll\ .~ \\..........-:: \\ . '. ¡'\ ~ '., /' [l.... '.' ,·/·/,;;,,!:;tl1;¡ V····.,···-/'{..···· -' ..--...../::-/<...-,.:.....-.-.../.- /./// ";0'// /~ //~/IIì1A I 10 '. \\ \\ ':--"- \ -"'-' I ;;;:¿ /' // %~'iz,,,~/.,,/ / /¡ /' -...... / _' ____. /// / .-' / .-- 1/ /.' . _.' //' II /,II/ "" \! \ ,,<:::---. / IV' -S-,f" I {/ 'Y' . or/.' -.' ./.." ..' /// // ~.,., '///1,/ I '\\ ._____ .-- \. I ,(Jl _,-' .r /~ >~/'/ ..- __ .-~ --' /--..... /' /-- / ,--.><,..-,//; . """,..../,_ ,/.,/' I \ . _-... """ I.... t. _~... I.: 01, iIr~ ..:t/ ' ,/....ç;!' ~ 1"'/ .... ..1 ~/...../:..<.......:--;-:::=~~,:--;/.:;......;:;--.._.. ~../............. J ....~......::--.__..::::-.:: '--.I . . '. 'f-" -' - . .,- ! ~l!:¡; y¡,/ / [, . ..' :z /,.. /., ../,;,., ,/ .,/ .-.-//:-...~-.;/ c;: 0" 'iZ<-::-'-: //.:;::--~,,</// '-- -'" ..-'--. --- -' ~.:~....;.,~ __./_./',~J./ (:,' /:/' C)/:( :'(,.,.../.~"...<////...;.../( ..........':..... ~...... ;1;' /....-::......:......../1. \ .........--_ \. .' . -. ":. -,.--.-:-.. 7u·:";-7ãi;~ .~:;..5::1,i"J:S1,' g ) ....,\ I,,\'.\:\<:,(~:.:--':~~::<SS:'-'\\ )))/~)J.) ) . ~.Ä~ ~\-'--._..,_..._._._ Q.--~.~-:~~ .: 1/(':1" IJ,"-' Ir~d,~.',··q 1"'-' :-. ,~ '¡ .:\\:\;,;;;.:~¡-~'...\\<\),,ljjlil'~I/ / J ;øft .... ,.rf-rr\""\-.... ....-..-. :c-, .-J.)~~~2.. .J>- 1/ -,;-p--"'(\.....- --\ :"\'¡I/'~'//,jlí'j.III I 1 ."" 1-- ." .. " _r ...)----:--: _ .. . ili°Î.o¿'·· rt.J.. ,-'. . <.>-.,'- " ~-...__ '. ". N.o. (f ~ I. !I 'll~//I I 1,/ _ J \i ¡¡;.: .,' .:' < ...~ -··I4..:..:.-·...........>:,¥¿f:,·~~:~/'·/...:-·-·,--'-~ .-' .,..;;-' ./.. "1 ..,-"\ \ ~\~U 1.~1-~/' ~~; I ,/~/ J /....,..\ {J )....~ ""jr(i ....11 ----~.-..:. . 'O~:-~." ".-:::::.....~...) .~ J -,/ ." .-' / b t:'l.~},·~ill.ll~';;"/// I ~ ('. r/'''-::::'' ': .\ -. 1/. ._õ- ·-t·.--'·· _....-'.'{r.-1~~oi-~~qj-'/~¡r¡····-J·-·· ': .... ),"f'Ý"Y .~::;ß41//i/1 \, ï;í t"C ( ~~\; J:!> ~. \. .~~ -9 r .. I . ..... ... .-..,' I /.0';1.: I . . / l ¿.~ . ~ ----- ! ..' - \:: -".' --' \:"., ¡;,)' !J./'" --,." r /--- -"c'- ... r'· : I /1/":" .~~' -.-.....) , oJ' J /",- . .~..,/,''''' I ...../..... .__ .~r· / ../.'.. -~ T r_~r -- . ':::--"""" .,:r.. . : \...L-...~0.y.j'l './ / ,.:........ ..... . J.... ~_........... ~}....I'-.,... ) h~ ~:~ ,,,,_.' /','/Î'-- ~·'ß.-;r...· -. ~I. ,-' /··'t/:f;g ,t..." I Þ6;~... """. .."......-..,. í f /',.,. /I~~Ø·/( ~,J1- )x ~~,.~ '. - ,./ ///...-. ..... I ." "" -: {; I / /' fj.'.. ~ /-- "'.[;1 ..' ,,' ..::¡,,,,... -~ . ¡ IIJ; 5JW:/.~. _ ".t-""" r:Vt f' -'''---'''-;(-/1/.-' "- -' '. -,"',":';;",",z:!.;;:5t!:>E-5f!:/ 1,.'/ " '"Y~'''::'':Æ;~'''-'''---;'::r''' '-. -'-,< i... 1/ /,1,';, j7i// ... .,~ " \ ! ~Y¡, ¡ /tY)·~··///;.·····..···-..~·~/.;":.... "':.'.:;.r;,~~~ r~_·r.:..~.!·~I'(:__""" ?......t>.. ¡~ /~I/////\)..,i / \ ~ ,J::'ð! .-.,/~~/~" "- .,(, "-"'-"/-''''''''.'/'-~- N~o·d- .>,'-,-"'r"'- "".,-l' :;¡ ·1 .(¡fI III ,',f' ! \ ,-C j.j-;,... .9., , "l A ..-' ,... ,. /,' . .' ~:¡:- E'::' ... '?ú'" ::;. .... ! . " lý r l";Ý' ,',' _,i":::'~-- --'- .....' -;.,.<.-- .::'.:~:-:,:..>/-, - ,,' ~ž::;'!.ø¡~/-· ! _ i... .J." ~¡;¡ --' ,/ \, ¡ij! ( ; I I,) " I c ~{--;-"" /" / / ..-...".. ).>/-, . " . ........ ....~................. 4~P.......j;s...- f!"P;" ~......~.;:; :-- ~ ~\ '- T Z! \' I j~ /\ / 1...~ .{]/ // ·/..:<:.:'--;.~__..'r-Jf.--<--..>.-;>~..-.--::>'" a__)t~J)-o'~ï~" ,'.__.>:._.~ /': \, 0 !! \,\\~\ :Ii')/.... I "" (( J?' /.;/ :~;:-/'~,,;.Ç~f, ..,~' :~1<.;-->:>.:,-:-..'.:~-,:"/~-.·..,~'-~--;::,¡~~ tn ! §"¡)' ~\:1 ; \ \ \\\I\~ \. \\\\\3 í ... _I -"-----. -/-"') ~'vY\~.",,;(( ~f"-f:':' ,/?,tf-') . 'f~"L-t.>.- . - f':>- .' - - -.-..>J.>--/'-' ______n'" '\f .' >- ~), \1\', \ \ \' I ¡),. 'rr """'.:t" .,/ t' ~..--·:¡1:>;:"'. --~-. . ,',:"-,..;.-'- --..---;..1"- 0 ~ ë1,...,. -' Q;') "i .\ '\\'~" '1\'\ 'I ;:\ ¡' ) I:J' ..,JJþ":/ -y>-,,-~ " ~'·r/.':'-:·"4 \1..,_.. .'~ . ~'....,.IJ _... ..., ,., ~....... A z. I I II' ~\ . I! i)) I '.,1. }... .....- '7 4/ ~"-+ ,--::y':::;:.: -·'r· '-- . i·-,-.-",:,:,~·::}""J(Y><-- ~ /"'1 ¡¡¡o~· . J '1 / ¡ í 'r\ I'll 'I': ~ I /( >- /- .' 01'/^ "-... v/..",,'>" ...' _ --'.- ~ ¥-- =' ".." ~ H / . 1'\' ""I') ,( >'.' ':~/:b"''\.7 ~fj: .,.>~ '=~?'-'-':-'. . ... // :~~f~~ / ~~ (.¡./ /;' i / \\\\ \ \, }\(, i Þ .r / If ~/:: <('//+"'»<)~ ~ # -- .>~"'.. --_/ '1è¡~tìy:..·'-··&I! ..'- ¡;¡,., I íi ,[11 1¡'¡\',\:9 " ~'" " ,-<{ ";J:;"---r- f ~ .~.~.......... '. " / _or·.......... ~~fOii ..~ -} ;',' g~~ / J I ¡ \ \ .\\\1\. ./" ,,···._._LMõ- ...."': .~:..// \ .........,. _ _..~ <... !2j.~Q~..... .../, /ª I ~. ". ~;z:z: f '\\,\\ \.,~.~~.-,..:~... \. J " .' . '\... J:I~~.~'/ ¡ _-) . . ";." /' I \All ".-'-'lC-..-"'~ \ ! .-.--'- ··,,····,,-.:;ð~i' ~·--_/'..~-.-··i!!-I.~><~·~:!ì .\ .1," (--"./i)}\\¡ :.(,<.';-' fl \ '.-- :~-'·:·::.!t~"~';--· .--. ..... ~ "~~"" 0 ~,Wf .... .'-" m~ r-'-'-....·('¡ I ~iJ ~'I¡" ..,...-.----- '., \ I:' "':' '--. '.. - .: F)- - ...t~.:·:'.'....,-.._'''''--,-_5I c....::I L "/A I ~:..-',' - .',. - " \/ , ,~i. .) \ \!. Ii,' '. ,- \ 't' " I .. ... ~ ~. ::--'C"""W)o Z III .£:],.... =:J .' . '.' I t I I I' . I ( . ........ I '..... I ' , ~....<. .-, ...::~:«~.$':¡P^'-~·.-...~~· ~///:" i a'~ ( )' / {, il¡1 \'. :: ,\/ "2·'d.... l)j. i / ,...- ~..~ ....~......11"'i!:f.... .....0'1;; '.. 'I .}. J'" III" . NOI01,.,i:! 'l, ¡'I : .' ~::" s .(··:-;.;r,<;'\t~~....·.~~..·\' . -··!-,'h., "/, /~,... /!) ) :·ltI1î1.I~¡~\ \'i. ~~~~~~ L ;'\.,. ./ / ;' :' ~'::"~J, " '. ~·~iiit.'~<·,<·5"·Y r.,,,, "¡y,--'("'" ........-... )...' 'j /1-/ í)) .!!:II Iii! ~~ ~ \ 1~Þ:~1!:~ I ''\ ·t~ ,.. / ,~ ....' ~.~ -.... A"¡. '.. ,.~ ::I ;, \ \ ,,{~\ ~~ ), /°1 i //.þ' ¡¿, ."11:\, \\\~. ih} ~'\i ~:;- ~~ß I .~I 'J.{ / ./ ..... ~_.;--........., :............. \ z¡, \ .-\,,'-.(' z £J I II' (II ¡'.JII,.!! I:;j.l\ I vl nlTll J " I....... I ¡ ~~......-.... ' I Þ ~ "'.,', ,; 'o\:: \ ..... " .)' /:: 11/(/' 'JliJ;h :~'\: " J õ ¡¡¡¡;j:;:. I I L, 'i. /-- .<::- ...~.;.-: . .. c)': -~.~.. " ~ \ .... ~ /) / 10....... ! ! I ~l "1¡¡¡ IJd :~ \. \\ r ~ ';!?D' ..-. 1 / ....-"-1... 'Y"""'~ ~ .~=:::~:;::t:%~~~ . ~.f>J',,::?:S.~~;>.._._ \\"-~l-l..< "',..._~ __-~'f' / ¡!i,lY..::...-I/I·/·I/íl¡ii!I"~J:·:j! % ~'ª \ ~ / ¡ / "'J'jlj". ,------""..."'..,.,;..:'--....' ~-_ c...f>ê.'-....--.~-.,_~' \ '-l... ::I .I... ''1/'"' ~ u!¡/!J,I'õ'/I/ , L , 0 I '.' c:: / - _' ,.::·--:~~·'·:·I'<~-::-:'-:'" ~ .-:: ~k- 0>"';'-"'~~~'~'" \. '-'..".~ yJ /j J:/ J!///rÇ,':;;-.~· '''11'¡( III ~ ~ ì ) /' ./ ...- / '" .' "3l/'" '\¡:¡}',"' )...~ "" ~j"\ '~~.~"";.~~'S'" ". ..............,... ,{711, IJ ':0, 0t(; . ·IJ '. VI _I ( / / / c::, " .. .-'. " """ \.. " -.... .... VLlO' -,<.,;.""~""~ & [/" I, /"/ c::) '.J "I' ',1 J '. .-'-- ~/ / I . I .' / .':'¡", '~"I .............- ........ ...... .." ..... ~""~'~~-~~::~". ~ .',1/.//' _ .J.. J II , . ./ ~., / l ,I ( "//1..··: ",', '...~- .' ~i;:R;~,::.,." . ~ 1/ A/ '////1/1/1/. c')rKiJ/ I" I 'fJ'.. / ./ / / I ( , //1 ~ !//,' // ........- .... . :....:--- ~~~~::~~.~.... Z / -.~II /;¿¿I/ ////////~:"',/./ [oJ ')/. /t/ ;0 \ ¡ r .' ',' ", ,,' ¡'!ii ¡'¡'! ," . ',,_. ,_ ~>, --...... :,;, ~~'i';':~~~"'~ 'I,r~>;;<.....~;//?¡../"..r/;/'!'.{/..¡-:/ ~ i / / / / I""\) '/ /' :...\ \"'il I',"~ '--'-~,,_--...... -...; .--" j ...~ì'::". . ,_¡/~./)r..,///,.///'I.,/ ;·æ.lI'NJ Ii! ::J./ / J ;' ! \ 'w' ~,\\~' .... ";-\--~ - "--""" ..' ~,:, '/"':-<"-~':>%'////' J. 'I'/f/ Iii ' I ¡ I· I ..-.(;/! \\\\ ". - "~'I, "'" '-, '. ... ~ ~-'~<-< /// // I/-:/,/, I) /. . ,¡ If ~ I I, I, " ',:,.' "\" '., '.... -.... ""'" """ .~;:..;>.>' ./.// /'l::~// ¿j¡". .1' r 1'" 'I': ' 'II' I \ ..:.....\ :" "', ....1_, !'-":." / ~..... ..... .0:::.::~~?f<:::?·::/.>2;->' ..j\//(¡'.::,'L ----f---.----. ! I '\ / ( 1\..." \\'\\:~ -_ .:~",------- -"";;':~::_......./ ..,," l........~...:,....~~{<l~..J;I:./;'..~ I ~·¡¡f , " " _...,--.....~~ ~/' (./.. rj; ! "\ .' '\ /,6. -~~:f;~~~··~:- /' ,V.. _/"." -M0- '.I['..-./'~'~?>:.::.-::>:::'.:---';~~~... .. to'J .' -' / .,--~. .~<;~ ~¡j£~~~¿:¡¡gll/(~~\ " ... . / )'7 " ' - . / .' ': l:i. ~"'" . ~\- ._. ......../.....;.:...r;' ../ / \"¡\~\.. I: I : I"--~:::: :::-... ... " ,". / / / \ .. \, , I I I ). --.. -. ;,!~.¡ ./ :' c.: / /., ,,'. \ .. "- ..1 I ) '" ()..-.i. / ,( " I ;'!. . ,,\\\ .... I j--.J ~-..... i.--.... .' y.; ,fl \ '. -'\\', \\ ". '").. ..~ I ..' ,/' ,.:.~ !1'0. \.', \\\\ \"\... ~, .~./ .~. ".. " \ /)... ,.. \.. '.' .y., \ ", \"~'--. 0 IUT---------.--··)-'"'" -.... / . . ¡'" , i '. ". .... ,\, "":<~'_ .'.-..... I ï r'hL ,,=' " \ \. -'-'''.. . / ........ , ....., ') í I .// ../ \. " \ , ') / / I / / l / " I ...._----.. /, ¡ "'., I i, \ : I 8-4 VILLAS OF THE VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES Site Desi2:n Guidelines Intent These design guidelines are written with the intent to guide the development of Villas of the Valley. They are intended to develop the overall character of the community. These guidelines are not meant to cover all site-specific issues or alterations and should be applied as a guide to meet the development goals of the project. Association All property owners at Villas of the Valley will automatically be members of a Homeowners Association for this development. The Homeowners Association will be established to maintain the entire development including the exterior of the town homes. Parking and Internal Drives All internal parking and drive aisles will be in accordance with Roanoke County Design Standards. This includes parking requirements, dimensions and landscaping. All internal parking areas and drives will be privately maintained by the Homeowners Association. Sidewalks and Trails Concrete or stamped concrete sidewalks will be provided to each unit from the parking area serving that unit. The minimum sidewalk width shall be 3 feet. A wa.1king trail shall be provided to the proposed gazebos and any other site amenities. The trail surface shall be mulch or pea gravel and shall be a minimum of 3 feet wide. Landscaping and Buffers The 15' landscaped buffer along the southern and western property line shall be developed in accordance with Sect 30-92-5 (A) Type A, Option 2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. This landscape buffer specifies a 15 ft. buffer with one large tree and 3 small trees for every 75'. Also required is a 6 ft evergreen screening and 2 large shrubs for every 10ft. Balzer and Associates 9 8-4 Landscaping along Peters Creek Road and Newland Road will consist of a planting strip containing a minimum of one large deciduous tree for every 30 linear feet along the public street right of way. Small trees planted every 20 linear feet may be used where an overhead power line or other obstruction is present. In addition, a minimum of two shrubs shall be placed in the planting strip for every five linear feet of frontage. This should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be unifonnly planted. Undulating benns a minimum of 3 ft. high will also be provided. All other landscaping and the landscaping internal to the parking area shall be in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Each unit will be professionally landscaped with sufficient foundation landscaping and additional trees where sufficient growing space is available. Lot Size The minimum lot width shall be 22 feet and the minimum lot area shall be 1,000 sf. The lots shall encompass the entire unit including any porches, overhangs and/or decks. Minimum Building Size The minimum building size shall be 1,150 sf for one story units (including the garage), and 1,408 sf for two story units. The minimum townhouse unit width shall be 22 feet. Maximum Building Height The maximum building height for the townhouse units is 45 ft. Accessory Buildings There will no accessory buildings pennitted for residential use. Setbacks There shall be no required setbacks for the units from internal lots, except that no group of townhomes shall be closer than 10 feet to any other group of town homes. Balzer and Associates 10 8-4 The minimum setback for any unit rrom Peters Creek Road and Newland Road shall be 30 feet. The minimum setback for any unit rrom all other property lines shall be 15 feet. Density The proffered maximum number of townhouse units shall be 60. Density Calculation: 5 Units per Acre + 12.5 Units per Acre for open space bonus 17.5 Units per Acre or 174 Units Total 174 Units are allowed as a maximum. 60 Units are being proffered Open Space The minimum contiguous open space provided for the development shall be 40% in the undeveloped portion of the site. This does not include areas within the parking areas. The only disturbance to the open space or preserved area will be the installation of the water, sanitary sewer, stonn sewer, and stonnwater management, and/or any other necessary utilities. The utilities will be installed with as little impact as possible. Lighting All lighting shall be residential in scale and style (i.e. post mounted lighting) and shall not exceed 10' in height. The lighting shall be arranged so it does not cast glare on adjacent properties nor does more than 0.5-foot candles cross any adjacent property line. Utilities All utilities shall be placed underground and all heat pumps and other appurtenances shall be screened rrom view rrom the front ofthe unit. Trash Collection Trash collection shall be can pick up. Balzer and Associates I I 8-4 Architectural Requirements The developer has supplied townhouse plans and elevations representing the style proposed for this development. Examples of the elevations can be found on the following pages. Exterior Materials: Siding shall be a mixture of brick and vinyl siding, except that the rear foundation wall of any unit shall have a minimum of a parged coating. Roofing shall be a minimum of an architectural style shingle. Grouping: No more than 7 townhouse units shall be grouped together in a single block. No more than 2 abutting town houses shall have the same front building line. The minimum variation in front building lines shall be 3 feet. Balzer and Associates 12 >- W --.J --.J « > w :r: f- LI- e v: « > Q w V) o 0- o 0;:: 0..0 1- µ !jl -;t -1 C) - 1 ~ ~ U> \ ::> > .... ù\ Q ;±: ...1 "2 ))l \.\\ ~ \ ~-- tr- -r" ~ t- >- ~ tl- ..LL .L\- .ç) , tF· A ) . ~ \J' \» ~ ( --:1: '> A- < ~ ~ -1 t)...- -1 - > ,/ ;::. ~ I ~ - t. <III: \ ~ f \ --l \J)<S ) ".~~ ~) Q .1J -:t::" - ",~~.,-r :z ~ ~ ) -~ ~t ~ )0-' ~ cLllJ - 1.1 ~ '- \f\ ~ <- .Q \.\ ...J ~ oJ cf. --l II;: * ;;: 0. 8-4 ~ \ Zonif1g 1 _AGJ ~ _EP ,(- $~ 0 .Am ð,l:- 'Z rPl ) ~ AA ~ _All <f'~ ~1 ~ .C2 q,4.t . C2CVOD ( 11 ~12 -< .PCO PRO .PTO F!, / R2 R'3 R4 ~ RCL - Applicants Name: R. Fralin Development Corp. Existing Zoning: R-1 Proposed Zoning: Rezoning Tax Map Number: 26.20-4-1,2,3 & 4 Magisterial District: Hollins Area: 9.95 Acres June 27, 2005 Scale: 1";;;; 200' Roanoke County Department of Community Development