HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/28/1989 - Regular
February 28, 1989
52 6
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, virginia 24018
February 28, 1989
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County,
Virginia,
met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February,
1989.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:06
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
527
February 28, 1989
-
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk
,
~.
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Sam Crews,
Coopers Cove Baptist Church.
recited by all present.
The Pledge of Allegiance was
IN RE:
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
Item 7, Award of bid for short term borrowing, was
added to New Business.
~ '
Public Hearing 289-2 was continued to March 28, 1989
at the petitioner's request.
IN RE.
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Art Whittaker upon
his retirement from Piedmont Airlines
Chairman Lee Garrett presented the resolution to Mr.
Whittaker who was present.
February 28, 1989
52 8
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared
resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ART
WHITTAKER FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS
COMMUNITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, the service of Piedmont Airlines to the
Roanoke Valley has been important to the residents and businesses
of the area; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has worked for Piedmont Airlines
since August 1948, and spent the last 22 years as Station Manager
at the Roanoke Regional Airport; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been responsible for the
operation of Piedmont's airplanes in and out of Roanoke and has
contributed greatly to the impressive efficiency and safety
record of the company in the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been an active member of the
Cave Spring community in which he resides and has benefited the
citizens of Roanoke County by his involvement.
52 9
February 28, 1989
----
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the
citizens of Roanoke County, and on its own part, expresses
appreciation to Art Whittaker for over 40 years of dedicated
service to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
r
t
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
1. Presentation from the Citizens for Governmental
Excellence of petitions for the proposed consolidation of Roanoke
County and Roanoke City.
The following citizens were present to speak, and to
present to the Board of Supervisors the petitions signed by
Roanoke County citizens, requesting that the Roanoke County
governing body effect a consolidation agreement between the
jurisdictions of Roanoke City and Roanoke County and that a voter
referendum be held on this issue. They also presented a copy of
February 28, 1989
5"3 0
the Notice of Filing in the Circuit Courts of Roanoke City and
Roanoke County.
1. Lee Brooks, 1918 Oxford Avenue S. W., Vice
Chairman of the Citizens for Governmental Excellence, a
valleywide citizens group formed by, and comprised of the Roanoke
Jaycees, the Cave Spring Jaycees, the Northwest Revitalization
Corporation, the Roanoke Valley Board of Realtors and other
concerned citizens. Mr. Brooks advised that this organization
was formed to allow the citizens of Roanoke Valley to have a
voice in their government by means of this petition drive.
2. Mark S. Lawrence, 4410 Summerset Drive, S. W.,
President of the Roanoke Jaycees.
3. Gary Bower, 1410 Lori Drive, Roanoke, representing
the Cave Spring Jaycees.
4. Ed Hall, 2810 Avenham Avenue, representing the
Roanoke Valley Board of Realtors.
5. Brandon Bell, 5268 Golden Eagle Lane.
Supervisors Robers and McGraw thanked the members of
the various organizations for taking the time to collect the
necessary signatures.
2. Approval of 1989-90 Reqional Airport Commission
Budqet.
53 1
February 28, 1989
-
-
There was no discussion of this item.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared
resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-2 APPROVING THE FISCAL
YEAR 1989/90 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE
ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Section 17 of the contract between the City of
Roanoke and Roanoke County, Virginia, requires the Roanoke Region-
al Airport Commission to prepare and submit its operating budget
for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of
the County and the City Council of the City prior to February 15
of each year; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission trans-
mitted its 1989-90 budget to the City of Roanoke and Roanoke
County by letter dated February 14, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
adopted its fiscal year 1989-90 annual operating budget at its
February 14, 1989, meeting; and
WHEREAS, it appears that estimated revenues shall once
again exceed estimated expenses.
February 28, 1989
53 2
-
NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby resolved by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the annual operating budget for fiscal year
1989-90 of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby
approved.
2. That the Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution
to the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and
to Jack Spain Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virgin-
ia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
3. Request from the Registrar for an appropriation of
funds for Primary Election.
A-22889-3
There was no discussion on this item.
Supervisor Nickens moved to appropriate $23,855 for the
State Republican Party primary election on June 13, 1989. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
53 3
February 28, 1989
NAYS:
None
4. Rescheduling of June 13, 1989 meeting date to June
14, 1989, because of Primary Election.
There was no discussion on this item.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared
resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-4 RESCHEDULING A REGULAR
MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 13, 1989
WHEREAS, by Resolution 1489-2 adopted on January 4,
1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County established a
regular meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors for calen-
dar year 1989; and
WHEREAS, a primary election will be held on June 13,
1989, a date previously scheduled for a regular meeting of the
.-
Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 1489-2 establishing a certain regu-
lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
February 28, 1989
534
is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for June 13,
1989; and
2. That the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989, is
hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. at
the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Ave-
nue; and
3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of
this Resolution to be posted at the Roanoke County Courthouse,
the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County
library, and to be advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News
on May 30, 1989, and June 6, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
5. Authorization to initiate a sanitary sewer proiect
for the Hiqhfields/Lakeland Road Area.
A-22889-5
There was no discussion on this item.
Supervisor Garrett moved to establish a special sewer
service area and that staff be authorized to send notice of the
project and agreements to all property owners in the area so that
commitments may be made by the residents. The motion was
535
February 28, 1989
----
-
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
6. Authorization to initiate a water proiect for the
Old Hollins Road Area.
A-22889-6
Supervisor Johnson asked how many people must sign up
to initiate the project. Utility Director Clifford Craig advised
that 46 people must sign up or the cost will be more, either to
the people or to the County.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
7. Award of Bid for $9 Million Revenue Anticipation
Notes
Finance Director Diane Hyatt presented the staff
report announcing that the low bid was Central Fidelity Bank at a
rate of 6.98 percent. She advised that the home and local office
February 28, 1989
536
of all lending institutions in the Roanoke Valley were contacted
to bid.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett
RESOLUTION 22889-7 AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION
NOTES, SERIES 1989A IN THE AMOUNT
$9,000,000
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a resolution on
February 14, 1989, authorizing the County to borrow not to exceed
$17,000,000 and issue its revenue anticipation notes therefor;
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary
and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 and to issue its Revenue
Anticipation Notes, Series 1989A therefor ("Notes") to meet
casual cash flow deficits of the County; and
531
February 28, 1989
-
WHEREAS, bids have been taken for the purchase of the
Notes, and the County desires to specify the form and details of
the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal
results in the lowest interest cost to the County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
1. The Board of the County determines that it is
advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an
aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale
of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the
Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the
County.
2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without
privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially
the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of
the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in
denominations of $25,000 shall be numbered N-1 and upward,
sequentially, shall bear interest at the annual rate of 6.98%
payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1989. The
Notes shall not be subject to paYment or redemption before
maturity.
3 . The County Administrator and Treasurer of the
County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes,
and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the
February 28, 1989
538
seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution,
imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile;
provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator
and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid
until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent.
In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose
signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer
before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such
facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until
such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or
may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its
execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at
the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been
such officers. Upon receipt of paYment therefor, the Treasurer
of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and
deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The
officers and agents of the County are further authorized and
directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this
Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all
things necessary for this borrowing.
4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as
Paying Agents for the Notes. The principal of and interest on
the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States
5:$ 9
February 28, 1989
-
-
upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal
corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia.
5. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested
and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the
County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery
of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants
and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall
comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
6. The Board determines that it is in the best
interest of the County to accept the bid of Central Fidelity Bank
to purchase the Notes and such bid is accepted.
7. The officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and
delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such
officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and
confirmed.
8. The Offering Circular with respect to the sale of
the Notes is hereby approved in substantially the form submitted
at this meeting and the County Administrator is authorized to
execute and deliver the Offering Circular with such changes,
additions and deletions as he deems appropriate.
54 0
February 28, 1989
-
9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the
Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant
to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett
IN RE:
REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
Supervisor McGraw requested a work session on
recycling on March 14, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Hodge reminded the
Board that there was a joint work session scheduled with the
School Board on March 14 at 4:00 p.m., and a work session with
the Fire Chiefs on the same date at 6:30 p.m.
Supervisor Robers moved to request that the Landfill
Citizens Advisory Committee be involved in recycling projects,
with new appointments being made if any member does not wish to
54 1
February 28, 1989
continue to serve.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Nickens requested that Item 2 be removed.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent Agenda
with Item 2 removed. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for February 28, 1989, designated as Item I
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows:
February 28, 1989
54 2
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
2 . A~~£eva~ -e~ -Ra~~~e -PeER:i:~ -~e£ -~Re -eave -S~£:i:R.EJ
JayeeesT
3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the
Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd
Judicial Circuit.
4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian
Power Company.
5. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being
dedicated by Dominion Bank.
6.
Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road
Britany Road in the Va. Department
Transportation Secondary System.
Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle
Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department
Transportation Secondary System.
and
of
7.
and
of
8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Section No.2, Huntridge
9. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of
Tansportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road
b. 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle
c. 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road
d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road
10. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White
Subdivision.
11. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Velma G. Edwards.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
543
February 28, 1989
-
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers with Item 2 removed, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-8.b OF APPRECIATION
TO THE HONORABLE JACK B. COULTER
UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS JUDGE
OF THE 23RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
WHEREAS, The Honorable Jack B. Coulter became judge of the
23rd Judicial Circuit in 1975, and has served the citizens of the
Roanoke Valley with dignity and honor; and
WHEREAS, Judge Coulter not only served the citizens through
his career as a judge, but through membership in many civic
organizations and his interest in youth activities; and
WHEREAS, those activities included President of the Roanoke
Jaycees, Vice Chairman and member of the Roanoke City School
Board, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Chamber of
Commerce, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke
Y.M.C.A., membership in numerous legal organizations, as well as
teaching, lecturing and coaching youth sports activities; and
WHEREAS, in recognitions of these endeavors, he was named
February 28, 1989
5 4 4 1·
Father of the Year for Youth Leadership, received the Jayceee'
Distinguished Service Award, and the Military Order of World
Wars' Patriotic Award; and
WHEREAS, Judge Coulter has distinguished himself throughout
his legal career and sponsored many innovations in the courtroom
designed to ease the responsibilities of jurors, attorneys, and
those whose cases were being heard.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its deepest
appreciation and the appreciation of its citizens to The
Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit,
for his many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to
Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes
for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HUNTRIDGE ROAD AND BRITANEY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
545
February 28, 1989
-
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road
from its intersection with Springer Road to the cul-de-sac for a
distance of 0.32 mile and Britaney road from its intersection
with Springer Road to its intersection with Huntridge Road for a
distance of O. 14 miles to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) to (60) foot right-of-way for said roads have
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section
No. 2 Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
10, Page 12, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 27, 1986 and that by
reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of
Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Huntridge Road and Britaney
Road and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
'.
February 28, 1989
54 6
-
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Departmen~
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 22889-8.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
KILDEER CIRCLE AND FALCON RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kildeer Circle a
section of road extending from Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541)
in a southerly direction to a cuI de sac for a distance of 0.09
miles and Falcon Ridge Road extending from Hawkbill Circle (Rt.
1938) in a westerly direction to Hunting Hills Drive (Rt. 1541)
for a distance of 0.40 miles.
Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1,
Paragraph C-l and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, paragraph
A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia and unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 5 and
? 4.1
...,ß
February 28, 1989
-
Plat Book 8, Page 48, dated December 15, 1971 and June 6, 1973,
respectively, and deeds of later dates, all of record in the
Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that these roads were open
to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to
and used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests
are not involved.
5. That said roads known as Kildeer Circle and Falcon
Ridge Road which are shown on a sketch accompanying this
resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads
to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highways by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
APPROVAL OF RAFFLE PERMIT FOR THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES
February 28, 1989
54 8
Supervisor questioned the legality of this type of
raffle permit under the state code and pointed out that the
activity had already been held prior to this meeting.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney suggested that the item
be tabled so that he may research the legality of the raffle
permit.
Supervisor Nickens moved to table the issue for legal
research. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Robers
PRESENT: Supervisor Johnson
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the Raffle Permit.
There was no second and the motion died. Mr. Mahoney advised he
would research the legality of the raffle permit.
IN RE:
REPORTS
Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the
following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
549
February 28, 1989
-
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid - January 1989
5. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as
of January 31, 1989.
IN RE:
RECESS
Chairman Garrett declared a brief recess until 4: 00
p.m.
IN RE:
WORK SESSIONS
1. Joint Work Session with Parks and Recreation
Advisory Commission.
Mr. Hodge advised that the Commission had been
studying the operations of the Parks and Recreation Department to
suggest cost efficiencies and improvements and that these items
will be brought back to the Board members for approval in the
future.
Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss
introduced the Chairman of the Commission, Yvonne Willis, who
February 28, 1989
55 0
introduced the other members of the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
Ms. Willis reported that the commission formed two
committees, one to study cost efficiencies and one to study
property evaluation. A public assessment survey has also been
conducted. She also informed the board that a parks ordinance
was being drafted.
Director of Parks and Recreation Stephen Carpenter
presented an overview of the department, describing the number of
acres and parks maintained by the Parks division. He reported
that six additional parks have been added as a result of the 1985
bond referendum.
Vince Joyce, vice chairman of the commission,
described the public assessment survey project, and reviewed the
resul ts of the survey. Mr. Joyce and Mr. Carpenter also
presented a summary of the progress on the 1985 bond projects
which included Green Hill Park, Starkey Park, Whispering Pines
Park, Happy Hollow Garden, Vinyard Park and Waldron Park.
There was a discussion on the positive and negative
impacts of a fee structure. Several board members expressed
concern at charging a fee to participate in recreational
activities.
Mr. Joyce outlined recommendations that the commission
had prepared to improve maintenance and efficiencies and raise
55 1
February 28, 1989
funds to be utilized for parks and recreation. They further
requested that the Y -camp at the Spring Hollow Reservoir be
turned over to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize staff to bring
the individual reports back to the Board of Supervisors to
consider action in the future. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE:
RECESS
There was no executive session and Chairman Garrett
declared a dinner recess at 5:20 p.m.
EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.)
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED FROM 3:00 P.M.)
1. Final recommendations on Proposed Landfill Sites.
A-22889-9
February 28, 1989
55 2
Chairman Garrett advised this was not a public hearing
concerning the proposed sites. Public hearings have previously
been held around the county, and at this time, there will be no
opportunity for public input.
Mr. Hodge reported that the search for a new landfill
site for the Roanoke Valley began more than a year ago. Since
that time, staff and consultants have evaluated more than 50
sites and identified six that were the most feasible. Mr. Hodge
stated that following the reports by the Citizens Advisory
Committee and Dr. Olver, the consultant, he will request Board
authorization to forward two sites to the state for Part A
application. After careful review of the consultant's work,
visits to each site, and work sessions, he recommended proceeding
with the Bradshaw and Boones Chapel sites. He reminded the Board
that all six sites have potential, if the Board wishes to choose
other sites. Each Part A application will cost approximately
$46,000. He advised that the top two sites were recommended
because they have the best socio-technical characteristics.
The Bradshaw site with a matrix score of 291 was
considered the best site. An access road should be constructed
so that landfill vehicles will not have to use Bradshaw Road.
The second choice is Boones Chapel with a matrix score of 214.
The Buck Mountain site, with a matrix score'of 224, would have
been second, but due to a projected life of only 15 years, the
55 J.
February 28, 1989
consultant and staff recommend that this site not be recommended
at this time. The Fort Lewis Site and the Mount Pleasant site
are very close in ranking, and the Red Hill received the lowest
score.
Mr. Hodge recommended that while the state performs the
necessary review, the County should conclude the contractual
arrangements with the other participating localities. The
Roanoke Valley should also pursue the possibility of an
additional landfill with Bedford County and increase recycling
throughout the valley.
Carlton Wright, Chairman of the Citizens Landfill
Advisory Committee, explained how the committee was involved with
the process and introduced the other members of the committee.
Their role in the process was to minimize the impact to the
residents in the host community; to assure that the selection was
as objective as possible and that proper emphasis was given to
social issues. The committee is also working on development and
operating standards for the landfill to assure minîmum impact on
the residents in the area. They met with the landfill consultant
and studied the factors, applying weights to them, ensuring that
top priority was given to issues such as proximity to homes, the
number of landowners, traffic impact, visibility of the landfill,
and buffer zones.
~
February 28, 1989
55 4
-
The committee has met every week and had two joint
meetings with the Planning Commission. They will make
recommendated conditions for the Special Exception Permit
approved by the Board of Supervisors. If approved, the
conditions will be binding on the landfill. Some of their
recommendations will include a guarantee that contaminated
groundwater will be replaced at no expense; if property is
devalued, the residents will be reimbursed; that access roads are
safe, and that there are adequate buffer zones. They feel the
host community should be compensated for having a landfill in
their area such as improvement projects, free use of the landfill
services, fire protection, and continued waste reduction measures.
Other recommendations include minimizing of noise and operating
hours, tight security, tipping fees that will encourage recycling
and escrow of funds that will compensate for groundwater
protection and devaluation of property. They will also recommend
environmental monitoring to ensure that the landfill operation
complies with the conditions attached to the Special Exception
Permit.
Mr. Wright reported that the committee plans to present
these recommendations to the Planning Commission in mid-April.
They will also begin to address the specific needs of the
Bradshaw and Boones Chapel sites and ways to reduce the waste
stream.
55 5
February 28, 1989
-
::::=:i::
[-
Dr. Olver, the landfill consultant, presented a slide
~
I
!
,
presentation outlining what was involved in the process. The
primary problems were the large suburban population making it
difficult to find a site that does not impact residents and the
complex geology. He advised that technically the best sites were
tl
located in Bedford and Franklin County. The consultant attempted
to address the technical, social and cost standpoints in using
the matrix system to rank the sites. The state has required that
the present landfill must be closed by July 1, 1992. Dr. Olver
stated he felt that recycling must be a part of the approach, as
well as waste-to-energy.
Dr. Olver advised they chose sites based on acreage and
a minimum life of 20 years. The Buck Mountain site did not meet
the life requirements for a regional landfill.
He reported that
t
I
I
t
r
i
¡
f
¡
I
¡
the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee was the first in the
state and serves as the citizens voice on this project. He
reminded the Board that their recommendations may be very
expensive. The estimated costs the consultants have projected do
not include costs for these recommendations.
Dr. Olver outlined the process that will take place
after Part A application. Part B will include plans and
specification on how the facility will be built. He also
explained the changes from the matrix originally established by
the consultant to the new matrix which included additional issues
~.
February 28, 1989
55 6
outlined by Mr. Wright. The matrix rankings were based on 24%
cost, 23% social and the remainder technical.
Dr. Olver advised that they have estimated the potential costs
for the Bradshaw site, but these costs could change when further
study is complete. Development costs are estimated at $15.6
million. The annual operating costs are estimated at $4.6
million. $100,000 will be set aside for an environmental trust
fund to cover issues such as groundwater contamination.
In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Dr.
Olver advised that the estimated life at Bradshaw is 60 years,
Fort Lewis is 60 years, Buck Mountain is 15 years, Boones Chapel
is 25 years, Mount Pleasant is 30 years and Red Hill is 20 years.
Supervisor Johnson asked about the possibility of a
monofill area for ash from waste-to-energy. Dr. Olver replied
that there is ample space at all but Red Hill and Buck Mountain.
In response to another question from Supervisor Johnson
concerning closing of the private debris landfills, Dr. Olver
responded that these dumps also will be closed in 1992 if they do
not meet the standards.
Supervisor Robers moved that the Board approve the
staff recommendation authorizing the submission of Part A
applications for the Bradshaw Road site and Boones chapel site.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
----r_
557
February 28, 1989
-
-
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
Chairman Garrett asked the County staff, the Citizens
Advisory Committee and the property owners to meet on Tuesday"
March 7th at 1: 00 p.m. at the Administration Center. The
property owners will have an opportunity to speak at that time.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 14, 1989)
289-2
Petition of J. L. Woltz and R. N. Bradley
to rezone a 2.92 acre tract from R-l,
Residential to R-3, Residential to
construct multifamily residences, located
at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
This request was continued until March 28, 1989 at the
request of the petitioner.
~
289-3
Petition of William and Catherine Fortune
for a Use Not Provided for Permit to
operate a dog and cat boarding kennel in
addi tion to a res idence on a 5 .45 acre
tract located at 5647 Lowland Lane in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Planning Director Terry Harrington presented the staff
report. He advised that Lowland is a narrow, gravel private road
with one small bridge with no railings.
The concerns at the
Planning Commission were the safety of the road. The petitioners
February 28, 1989
558
have promised a pickup and delivery service.
They have proffered
six conditions. The Planning Commission recommended approval by
a three to two vote.
The petitioner Kathy Fortune was present to answer
questions and advised that they have maintained the road since
they moved to the property.
In response to a question from
Supervisor McGraw, Ms. Fortune reported that the average turnover
was 4 to 7 days.
Donald Wolthus, attorney for George Janesko, spoke in
opposition to the petition because the petitioner does not own
the property to be rezoned, but only proposed to buy the
additional acreage. He als expressed concern about the traffic
and safety of the road and the bridge.
Following discussion of the traffic and safety factors
and the legalities, Supervisor Robers moved to deny the petition.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
289-4
Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an
approximate 1.2 acre tract from B-1
Business and R-l Residential to B-2,
Business to construct a restaurant, located
on the south side of Peters Creek Road, 280
feet week of its intersection with South
Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District.
55 9
February 28, 1989
-
Mr. Harrington presented the staff report.
reported that this is a in a Transition Land Use category.
He
There
are nine proffered conditions. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the request.
Ed Conner, the petitioner was present to answer
questions. He advised they will serve various sandwiches and
salads and the restaurant will seat 54 people.
Helen Horn, 1112 East Drive, expressed concern about
the potential drainage problems because of a branch on the
property, sewage problems and she wanted assurance of proper
screening.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with
proffered conditions. He also requested staff to investigate the
drainage and sewer problems. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 27.13-5, Lots 2-8, 22-26 and recorded in Deed Book 2,
page 169 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 and R-l
District to B-2 District
February 28, 1989
56 0
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
n· BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive
( 50' wide) 100 ft~ easterly from the east line of Lot 11
of the R.E. nillard Farm Map; Thence leaving East Drive and
with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 degrees 02' W.
308.69 ft~ to a point on the southerly side of Virginia
Highway Route No. 117; Thence with the same, N. 72 degrees
20'E. 227.41 ft. t~ a point; Thence leaving Virginia
·Highway Route No. 117 and with the westerly line of Lot 9,
S. 26 degrees 02' E. 161.50 ft. to a point on the north-
erly line of Lots 25 and ~6, N. 63 degrees 58' E. 50.00 ft.
to a point; Thence with a line thru the center of Lot 26,
S. 26 "degrees 02' E. 150.00 Ft. to a point on the northerly
side of East Drive; Thence with the same, S. 63 degrees 58'
W. 225.00 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and being all of
Lots 2 thru 8, all of Lots 22 thru 25 and the westerly one
half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record
in the Clerks Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia in Plat Book 2 Page 169."
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
(1) Property will not be used for such businesses as
hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, new car dealerships,
barber/beauty shops and flea markets.
(2 ) The building will be a single story.
(3) Restaurant will have no dance hall space.
(4) No flashing signs and no portable signs.
Permanent fixed signs only, limited to 80 sq. ft.
56 1
February 28, 1989
-
-
(5) Lighting will be arranged so as to light only the
lot of the permitted use.
(6) A 10-year stormwater detention facility with a
two-year release shall be constructed.
(7) A maximum of three game machines will be on
premises.
(8) Site development shall occur in compliance with
newly adopted County street and off-street parking design and
specification standards. One entrance only - VA 117.
(9) At a minimum, type C screening and buffering
shall be implemented on eastern, western and southern property
borders.
289-5
Petition of Central Fidelity Bank Inc. to
rezone a 1.02 acre tract from B-2 and B-3,
Business to B-2 Business to construct a
bank, located at 4143 Franklin Road in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Mr. Harrington reported that there were no significant
impact factors. There has been one modification to the proffers
since the Planning Commission heard the request.
The Planning
Commission recommended unanimous approval.
Jim Harvey, Assistant Vice President of Facilities for
Central Fidelity Bank was present to answer questions.
February 28, 1989
56 2
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the request with
proffered conditions.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 77.20-1-40 and recorded in Deed Book 1082, page 454 and
legally described below, be rezoned from B-2 and B-3 Business
District to B-2 Business District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at an existing iron pin on the westerly right-of-way of U.S.
Route 220 (Franklin Road) and being the woutheast corner of the
property of Cleasly St. Clair et ux (Tax Map Number 77.20-1-38),
THENCE leaving sa id St. Clair and wi th said right-of -way S 18 ° 15' 00"
E; 149.64' to a point, the Actual Point of BEGINNING,
THENCE .continuing with said right-of-way S 18°15'00" E, 154.60' to an
existing iroñ pin at the north right-of-way intersection of Valley
Street,
56 3
February 28, 1989
THENCE leaving Rout.e 220 right-of-way and with the right-of-way of-
Valley Street the following 4 courses:
S 14u37'50" W, 42.57' to an existing iron pin,
S 66°04'20" W, 103.00' to an existing iron pin,
S 56°28'33" W, 76.57' to an existing iron pin,
S 42°36'15" W, 25.19' to a point to an existing iron pin,
THENCE leaving said right-of-way of Valley Street and with the west
line of the subject property N 18°15'00" W, 233.03' to a point,
THENCE with a line through the subject property N 71°45'00" E, 221.65'
to the Actual Point of BEGINNING, containing 1.02 acres.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
(1) The site will be developed in substantial
conformity to the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates,
Inc. and dated January 9, 1989. The building may be oriented in
a slightly different manner to improve visibility and drive-thru
access.
(2) Site lighting will be directed downward and will
not exceed 20 feet in height. Signs will not be lighted after
10:00 p.m.
(3) Free standing signs will be limited to 50 square
feet and will not exceed 20 feet in height.
(4) The entrance on U. S. Route 220 will be placed
adjacent to the northern property line to facilitate a shared
entrance between the proposed bank site and the remaining
property to the north.
56 4
February 28, 1989
(5) Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. will coordinate with
Roanoke County to enable the County to upgrade the storm sewer
along the eastern property line (beside U. S. Route 220) prior to
Central Fidelity paving an entrance onto U. S. Route 220, so long
as cooperation does delay paving the entrances to the planned
branch opening on December 1, 1989.
289-6
Petition of Fekas Homes, Inc. to rezone a
3.75 acre tract from RE, Residential
Estates to M-2, Industrial, located at the
northeast corner of the intersection of
16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the
Vinton Magisterial District.
(Petitioner changed to Steve Rossi)
Mr. Harrington reported this petition is now being
submitted on behalf of Mr. Steve Rossi. The staff advised that
if this petition is approved, a land use amendment will be
instituted because the land use is presently Rural Preserve. The
petition plans to use this property for expansion, employee
parking and storage of concrete products.
Staff made several
recommendations concerning access to the site, and the petitioner
recommended that industrial traffic will use Brownlee Avenue.
Heywood Fralin, attorney for the petitioner, was
present and he advised that there will only be one additional
entrance and that the other entrance already exists. He reported
56 5
February 28, 1989
-
that none of the trucks or employees use Carlisle Avenue and are
willing to have that closed.
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the
proposed rezoning because of traffic flow, air pollution, noise
and lowered property values:
1. Joe Bryant, Riverdale Baptist Church.
2. Jennifer Bobbitt, 1601 Gordon Avenue
3. Eddie Bobbitt, 1601 Gordon Avenue
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about the traffic
at the entrances, the park and houses near the property and moved
to deny the petition. There was no second and the motion died.
Supervisor Nickens then moved to continue the petition until
March 28, 1989 so that the board members could personally inspect
and evaluate the site. There was no second and the motion died.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the petition with
conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
February 28, 1989
56 6
as Parcel 70.11-1-22 and 70.11-1-21 and recorded in Deed Book
1031, page 576 and legally described below, be rezoned from RE
Residential District to M-2 Manufacturing District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
:),
8ECI.NINC at an Iron p~n on the aouth aid, of Carl111e Avenue at
..t, euteely teralnul, lai~ point beln9 on t ,e Roanoke City-Roanoke
Co."ty Corponte I.lne and beinv I point c;:\ the 11na of Lot_l,
Rlveellde terraCe recoeded In the Cleek'. Offl:e of the Clecult Court
of :he City of Roanoke ill Kap 800k 1, Pave 2::31 thence 1eavln9 Idd
Point of "vinllll111 and crouin9 Cae1hle Aveiue, th.a followin9 the
euteely aide of an 11 foct alhy, M. 33' 41' E. 403.24 fut to an
old Iron pill on tha eut lide of 16th Stuet, alld cornee to the
Pf~perty pce.ently owned by Stephen C. , Seth Ann ROlli; thence with
·,he ROlai Hne alld the "I:opeety herein ducribed, S. 56' 19' E.
~~4.01 feet to an old iron pin 011 the I1na of·tbe WI Ilia. ,. Villyacd
lat~ter thence with the Vinfard Eltate, s. 31',48' :)' W. 455.99 feet
to ~ Icon pia on the line :f I.ot 6 of Rlveraide terrace; thance with
tb. caae line of Rlvee.l~e ~aerace Subð1vlalcr. t.nd tba Corpoeata Llne
.... ; ......
beh-un !loanoke City and f'oanolte County, II. 48' ?S" ~S·.... ·382.55
feet to the Place of 8£GINN!NG and belnv a pa~cel of 1aad containlnv
"
3.~658 acee. and be1nv a. ., ,ovn on 80undary s;.Ievey for stephen C. ,
;...
.e;h Ann ào..i by t. P. Pa:ltee , Son, Entine.ca and lurveyor.'.Ltd.
;
d.t.ed Deca.bee 21, 1988. a t:opy of vhlc:~ ~. a:~ac:hed hereto and ucSe
. part bereot.
..l, .
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
56 7
February 28, 1989
(1) The property will be used only for concrete production,
storage and related uses;
(2) The Petitioner will substantially comply with the
attached site plan;
(3) The Petitioner will provide screening in accordance
with the existing Zoning Ordinance;
~
(4) Petitioner will not use sígnage exceeding 200 square
feet or exceeding 20 feet in height.
289-7 Petition of William Maas to amend the
proffered conditions dated November 17,
1987 on a 0.56 acre tract to construct,
assembly and sell wooden playground
equipment located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue
in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Mr. Harrington reported that this property was
rezoned in November 1987 from B-2 to M-l. They are now
requesting modifications of the conditions and offering new
proffered conditions. The playground equipment will ue a~sembled
in the building and sold on the site.
There are seven
- conditions and the Planning Commission recommended unanimous
approval.
56 8
February 28, 1989
Mr. Maas was present to answer questions.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the request. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 77.09-4-47 and recorded in Deed Book 1156, page 354 and
legally described below, be rezoned from M-l Conditional District
to M-l Conditional with amended conditions District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a point at the northeast
corner of the property of WADO Corporation
(Deed Book 1198, Page 144); thence N. 58°
00' E. 90.00 feet to a point; thence S.
3 2 0 00' E . 7 0 . 00 fee t to a po i n t; the n c e
S. 580 00' W. 90.00 feet to a point;
thence N. 32° 00' W. 70.00 feet to a
po i n t .
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
56 9
February 28, 1989
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5 )
No business hours after 9 p.m.
No outside storage of excess lumber of any kind.
No large truck delivery (i.e. semi-trucks)
Doors will be shut when saws are in progress.
Outside display area will be in respectable
condition at all times.
(6) No freestanding signage shall be permitted for
this use.
(7) The property shall only be used for the
manufacture and incidental sale of wooden playground equipment.
289-8
Petition of Lingerfelt Development
Corporation to rezone a 2.768 acre tract
from M-2, Industrial to M-l, Industrial and
obtain a Special Exception Permit for
related commercial uses to become part of
Valleypointe, located on the north side of
Kenworth Road 119 feet west of its
intersection with Peters Creek Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District.
There was no discussion of this petition.
Supervisor Nickens moved to grant the petition with
proffered conditions.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ i:
~ 1:
57 0
February 28, 1989
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 37.07-1-6 and recorded in Deed Book 1289, page 1309 and
legally described below, be rezoned from M-2 General Industrial
District to M-l Light Industrial District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a point 'designated as Point 1 on the
hereinafter mentioned plat, said Point being located
on the northwesterly side of Kenworth Road, said
Point being also the southeasterly corner of the
10.78 acre parcel owned by Smithsub, Inc., a Virginia
corporation, as described in Deed dated July 5, 1987,
of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1289, page
1309; thence leaving Kenworth Road and with the
northerly line of the property of Smithsub, Inc., N.
510 37' 39ft W. 736.50 feet to a point designated as
6A, being the ACTUAL PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence with
a new division line through the property of Smithsub,
Inc., S. 52° OQ' 19ft W. 414.89 feet to a point
designated as 3A, said Point being on the line of the
property of Overnight Transportation (Deed-Book 972,
page 569); thence with the northerly line of
Overnight Transportation, N. 37° 03' 21" W. 325.00
feet to Corner 4, said point being on the southerly
line of the property of Lingerfelt Development
Corporation; thence leaving the line of Overnight
Transportation and with the line of Lingerfelt
Development Corporation, N. 52° 33' 19ft E. 330 feet
to Point 5; thence continuing with the Lingerfelt
57 1 ¿:
February 28, 1989
Development Corporation property, the following two
courses and distances: S. 53° 11' 44" E. 54.5 feet
to Corner 6 and thence S. 51° 37' 39" E. 277 feet to
Point 6A, the ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING¡ and
containing 2.768 acres and being as more particularly
shown on Plat of Survey made by Buford T. Lumsden'
Associates, P.C., Engineers & Surveyors, dated August
25, 1988.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. The property will not include permitted uses for:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing,
rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender
work, truck repairing or overhauling, unless
incidential to the user's principal business.
b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other
similar ceramic products;
c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with
exterior runs and yards;
d. Outside flea markets, unless a special exception
has been granted by the Board of Supervisors.
2. That the property will be developed so as to utilize
landscaping and preserve existing vegetation where
possible. No more than 75% of each building site
will be developed for building and parking uses.
3. Outdoor advertising siqns (billboards) will be
prohibi ted.
4. That there will be no outdoor storage except under
the following conditions:
a. that it not be higher than the elevation of the
building¡
b. that it not comprise an area greater than 50% of
the floor area of the building; and
c. that it be screened from view with landscaping
and/or other approved screening materials in
accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke
County Ordinance.
5. That.all Ãtilities will be underground.
6. That ther~ will be no on-street parking.
February 28, 1989
572
7.
That the Petitioner will review the drainage -
situation for Valleypointe and implement a
design for drainage facilities to either retain
or detain the two (2) year storm (as has been
required by Roanoke County) and to consid~r
retention or detention for a ten (10) year
storm.
289-9
Petition of Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors to rezone a 1.03 acre tract
from M-l, Industrial to B-1, Business to
construct a rescue squad building and for
Planning Commission review of the
compatibility of a proposed rescue squad
facility and the Comprehensive Plan,
located at the southeast corner of
Brambleton and Valley Forge Avenues in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
There was no discussion on this petition.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the request with
proffered conditions.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 77.13-3-3 and -4 and recorded in Deed Book 1209, page
369 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-l District to
B-1 District
57 3
February 28, 1989
-
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
IEGINNING .~ . iron pin .e~ .~ the nor~nea.~ ln~er.eC~lon
of Ira.ble~oft Avenue end ~alley Por,e Avenue, ~beftce vi~h
~he ea.t ri,h~-of-way line of Iraable~o. Avenue
. 5.' 00' 00· E 204.20 fee~ to an iron pin ae~ near ~he
end of a 30' hi,h .~one vall and heift9
~he front corner he~...en LoU 4 all4 5.
Sec~ion 4 of Moun~ Vernon lei,ht., thence
leavin, Iraable~on Avenue anð vi~h Lo~
4
200.00 feet to an old iron pin found a~
the corner of Lo~a 4. 5. 1 and '. Sec~ion
4 of MOun~ v.rnon "i,hU, .dd iron pin
loca~ed . .5' 51· 1" W. 35.25 fee~ frOM
the aou~hVe~ corner of ~he Coun~y Ad.ini.~ra~ion
luildin" thence 1.avi.. Lot 4 and vi~h
LoU 1 anð .
S 32" 00· 00' E
· 72' 53· 00' W
· 5 . 55· 00' W
N 31' U· 20' W
· 40' U· 30' W
· 54' 00· u· W
124.14 feet to an iron pin .e~ ont he
norh~ ri,h~-of-way of Valley Por,e Avenue
and a fron~ corner of Lo~. 1 and ., ~hence
leavin, Lo~ . all4 the fron~ of Lot 1 and
.,i~h the nor~h ri,ht-of-way of valley
Por,e Avenue
107.99 feet to an iron pin .et at the
corner of Lot. , and " thence leavin,
Lot 7 all4 cootinuin, vith the north ri,ht-of-~ay
of Val1a7 'or,e Avenue
39.52 fee~ ~o a iron Fin set at the point
wher. the new ri,ht-of-way of Valley 'or,e
he,in., thence .,ith ~he nev ri,h~-of-vay
21.13 f..~ ~o a iron pin ..t, th.nce con~inuin,
wi~h ~he nev ri,h~-of-vay
41.14 f..t ~o a iron pin .et, th.nce continuin,
with ~he new ri9h~-of-vay
II." feet to a iron pin ae~, th.nce continuin,
with the new ri,ht-of-vay
S 17' 07' 00' .
,
t
,
I
¡
t
i
~
I
. 2' 32' 01" E 23." feet to the point of be,innin" containin,
1.03 acre.. ~re or 1.... accordift9 to
a .urvey by luford ~. LGasden , A..ociat..
IEING all of Lot. 5 an4 7 and part of Lot '. Sec~ion 4.
of the MOunt Vernon lei,ht. aubdivi.ion and bein, par~
of the real property conveyed to the Ioard of Supervi.ora
of Roanoke Coun~y by deed dated July 21. 19.3 and recorded
in Deed loOk 1195, Pa,e 'I and a part of the real proper~y
conveyed to the Ioard of Superviaor. of Roanoke County
by deed dated July 1'. 1".. and recorded in Deed loOk
1209. ra,e 3".
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
57 4 ;11
February 28, 1989
( 1) The entrance onto Brambleton Avenue will be a
one-way emergency entrance on and will be denoted by appropriate
signs and pavement markings.
IN RE:
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amendinq Section 21-4 (a) Enhanced
Emergency Telephone Tax, of Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke
County Code reducing the tax on purchases of local telephone
service to fund the E911 Emerqency Telephone System.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney presented the staff
report explaining that the ordinance would reduce the tax to 46
cents per month effective July 1, 1989.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing
the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - well lot on
Route 633, Benois Road.
57 5
February 28, 1989
Mr. Mahoney reported that the County had received an
offer from Alfred E. Wray in the amount of $15,007 and the
proceeds will be allocated to the capital improvement fund.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens,
Utility Director Clifford Craig said that this lot is more
valuable than other well lots because of its value to the
individual.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
3. Ordinance authorizinq the conveyance of a riqht-
of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company.
There was no discussion of this item.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
February 28, 1989
576
4. Ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-151,
Levy of tax; amount of the Roanoke County Code to provide
for the taxation of food that is sold for off-premises
consumption.
Mr. Mahoney reported that the General Assembly
authorized Roanoke County to amend its meals tax ordinance to
apply to food prepared on premises and sold to take out. A
public hearing and second reading will be held March 14, 1989.
The proposed effective date is April 1, 1989, and the
Commissioner of the Revenue will attempt to contact businesses
affected by this ordinance.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn at 9:05 p.m. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
57 7
February 28, 1989
-
-
I?/J~
'~& 2:;7t
ee Garrett, Chairman
....!.. .111
.,
..,1
." ,·f.!
t ,,"Uf'