HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/13/1989 - Regular
-
._------------~
l
)
~
!
I
~
,
\
~
t
¡
¡
f
September 12, 1989
11 1
~
===1
I
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Bramb1eton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
September 12, J: 9 a 9
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County,
Virginia,
met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September,
1989.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3: 05
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
11 2 -~
September 12, 1989
HUbbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk; Anne Marie Fedder, Information
Officer
t:::=::
I:=:::
I
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by John Chambliss, Assistant
County Administrator.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by
all present.
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Bob Archer for his
contributions to small business in the Roanoke Valley.
R-91289-1
Bob Archer of Blue Ridge Beverage Company was present
to receive the resolution. Mr. Archer was also President of the
Virginia Small Business Advisory Board.
Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the prepared
resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 91289-1 OF APPRECIATION TO
BOB ARCHER FOR SUPPORT OF COMMUNITY
LIFE IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY
September 12, 1989
11 J
==
===i
WHEREAS, Bob Archer has contributed to the
economic well-being of the entire Roanoke Valley, serving as the
chairman of the Governor's Small Business Advisory Board, a
member of the Board of Directors of Virginia Organized Industries
for a Clean Environment, a member of the Board of Directors of
the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau, and a member
of the Trade Center Task Force; and
WHEREAS, Bob Archer has been supportive of various
events in Roanoke County,
including the Sesquicentennial
Celebration and the All America City Celebration; and
WHEREAS, Bob Archer has been active in his own
industry, serving as a member of the Boards of Directors of the
Virginia Wine Distribution Association and the Virginia Beer
Wholesale Association.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its appreciation
to BOB ARCHER for his continued support of all aspects of
community life in the Roanoke Valley.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor Johnson, Robers, MCGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Recoqnition of contributors to the All America
City Celebration.
R-91289-2
11 4
September 12, 1989
Vice Chairman RODers recognized members of the County
!:=:=
staff
who
served
on
the
All-America
City
Committee,
representatives of Tanglewood Mall, television station WSLS-10,
and other representatives who contributed to the success of the
All-America City celebration held the weekend of August 25-27.
A resolution of appreciation was presented to George
Becker and Matt Brink from the Paramount Group and Tanglewood
Mall for their special contributions.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared
resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 91289-2 OF APPRECIATION
TO TANGLEWOOD MALL AND THE
PARAMOUNT GROUP
WHEREAS, Tanglewood Mall has provided facilities,
financial support, resources and expertise for County-wide
activities, such as the Sesquicentennial Gala and the all America
City Celebration; and
WHEREAS, the management and staff of Tanglewood
Mall, with their contributions of time, imagination and skill,
have been an integral part of the success of these celebrations;
and
WHEREAS, the generosity and community spirit of
Tanglewood, its staff and its parent group, the Paramount
September 12, 1989
11 5
~
~
Corporation, is an outstanding example of corporate citizenship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself, the County
Staff and the Citizens of the County, does hereby extend its
appreciation and gratitude to the management and staff of
Tanglewood Mall for the assistance and contributions they have
given to Roanoke county; and
FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
wishes to recognize the specific contribution of Tanglewood Mall
in the success of the All America City Celebration held August 25
- 27, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
~ Report on operations for the year ended June 30.
1989.
A-91289-3
Finance Director Diane Hyatt presented the staff
report, advising that Peat, Marwick, Main and Company is in the
process of conducting the final phase of their audit procedures.
The preliminary results show that the County generated additional
funds of approximately $2,026,000 because of revenues collected
in excess of the amount budgeted. Ms. Hyatt reported that when
",4:,
11 6
September 12, 1989
~
the additional funds are added to our existing fund balance of
$2,012,318, the undesignated fund balance will be $4,038,318
which is 6.93% of the general fund. Staff recommended that the
additional $2,026,000 from 1988-89 operations be added to the
I .
existing fund balance.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Ms.
Hyatt advised that the money the County borrowed was invested and
this offset the cost of borrowing.
Chairman Garrett directed County Administrator Elmer
Hodge to study the feasibility of a reduction in real estate
taxes and to poll the citizens on whether they would prefer to
maintain the current level of services with the current tax
rates, reduce the tax rate and therefore the level of services or
increase the level of services even if a tax rate increase is
necessary. He asked Mr. Hodge to bring the results back to the
Board in 39 to 45 days.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Approval of Economic Development Action Plan for
1989-90.
R-91289-4
Economic Development Director Tim Gubala reported that
September 12, 1989
11 7
~
--¡
==9 at previous work sessions, the board members requested an action
plan to establish specific recommendations to improve economic
development opportuni ties in Roanoke County.
Staff now
recommends that the Board take specific action including amending
the Comprehensive Plan to include five sites of approximately 650
acres in the Principal Industrial Category; rezone seven sites of
approximately 560 acres to Industrial District M-1, request the
allocation of VDOT Secondary Road funds in the Six Year Plan to
provide improved access to new sites; and to include water and
sewer extensions in the Capital Improvement Plan for these sites.
Mr. Gubala asked that the Board approve a resolution
initiating the rezoning and plan amendment process with the
Planning Commission, which will then be brought back to the
Board.
Staff would also like continue with pUblic-private
partnerships to develop industrial sites.
Supervisor Robers recommended that a special meeting be
held with the Economic Development Advisory group to receive
their comments.
Supervisor Johnson noted that some of the si tes are
inaccessible and directed staff to study the possibility of the
costs involved, including additional staff, if the County went
forward with "frontending" the access roads and water and sewer.
Supervisor Johnson moved to
approve the staff
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
11 8
September 12, 1989
~
NAYS:
.None
Þ=
RESOLUTION 91289-4 FOR REZONING
SITES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, Economic Development contributes to the
welfare of Roanoke County by creating opportunities, jobs and tax
revenue; and,
WHEREAS, the prospects handled by the Virginia
Department of Economic Development are shown industrial zoned and
.;,.. "ready to go" developed sites; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes the
importance of having developed industrial sites in Roanoke
County; and,
WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general
welfare, or good zoning practice require that the governing body
may by ordinance amend, supplement, or change the regulations,
district boundaries,
or change the regulations,
district
boundaries, or classification or property; and,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors requests the staff to submit the necessary documents
to the Planning Commission in order that potential industrial
sites may be considered for rezoning and development.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution and
approve action plan, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
September 12, 1989
11 9
-
AYES:
Supervisor JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
=
NAYS:
None
~ Recommendations for Stormwater Manaqement Proqram.
A-91289-5
Mr. Hodge reported that at the August 22nd meeting,
Supervisor Johnson requested staff to prepare a report addressing
stormwater management and ways the County can supplement or
expand the current program.
Staff recommended that the current
drainage maintenance program be continued, that the proposed
drainage ordinance be adopted in October, and that a proposal be
brought to the Town of Vinton and Cities of Salem and Roanoke to
develop a regional stormwater management program which will be
the basis for a bond issue.
Mr. Hodge advised that drainage
problems must be addressed on a regional basis.
In response to a question from Supervisor JOhnson, Mr.
Hodge replied that the staff will contact the other localities to
discuss the possibility of a regional stormwater management
program and will bring back to the board a report including cost
figures on an engineering study within the next 30 days.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
L..
Authorization
to
provide
employee
dental
12 0
September 12, 1989
, .
insurance.
==
A-91289-6
Mr. Hodge reported that this request was postponed
during the budget process.
Staff now is requesting a dental
insurance program for both County employees and school employees.
The Plan will be implemented and funded by County administration
for both groups in an effort to begin standardization between
County and school employees.
Mr. Hodge advised that at this
time, staff was only requesting authorization to receive
proposals for coverage to be effective January 1, 1990.
Proposals will be brought back to the Board of Supervisors for
approval. Director of Human Resources Keith Cook described the
coverage of the proposed insurance plan.
He advised that the
cost estimates were based on rates in Roanoke City.
Supervisor Nickens advised he was opposed to going
forward because this should be included in the budget process and
not added in the middle of the year.
Supervisor McGraw moved to go forward with requests for
proposal for dental insurance to be brought back to the Board for
approval.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS:
Supervisor Nickens
~
Acceptance
of
state
matching
grant
for
implementation of a recycl ing proj ect throuqh the State Enerqy
Conservation Proqram.
September 12, 1989
12 1
~
==1 A-9l289-7
General Services Director Gardner Smith reported that
this grant will expand the existing recycling program in West
County.
Supervisor McGraw moved to accept the grant. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Authorization to increase annual leave for county
employees with over 20 years service.
A-91289-8
Mr. Cook advised that when the Employee Handbook was
approved in January 1989, the section on Annual Leave was not
amended although several revisions were suggested by employees
and the Employee Advisory Committee. A survey has been completed
indicting that most localities provide additional annual leave
benefits after twenty or more years of service.
Staff is
recommending an increase from eighteen to twenty-one days of
annual leave for employees with twenty or more years of service.
Supervisor Johnson asked about the additional liability
to the County. Finance Director Diane Hyatt advised there is a
cap on accumulation of annual leave so there should be no
additional funds required.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve
the
staff
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
122
September 12, 1989
~
and carried by the following recorded vote:
F=
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Request for expansion of the Campbell Hills Water
System.
A-91289-9
utility Director Clifford Craig reported that Roanoke
County acquired the Campbell Hills Water System from Thomas
Brothers, Inc. in December 1978 .
The contract requires that
Roanoke County pay 50% of the costs of any expansion.
Thomas
Brothers has made application for the developer of Section II of
Campbell Hills, consisting of 12 lots.
They will be expanding
the existing water system, but the current system does not have
adequate capacity to supply the required fire flow.
They are
requesting a waiver of the request for additional storage. Staff
recommended that the Board approve the waiver with the condition
that full storage facilities be installed prior to any subsequent
development of this subdivision.
Supervisor
McGraw moved
to
approve
the
staff
recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
!L.. Request from Hollins Fire & Rescue for Roanoke
September 12, 1989
12 J
-
~ounty matcninq funds to purchase a heavy squad truck.
-
A-91289-10
Fire and Rescue Chief Tommy Fuqua reported that the
Hollins Fire and Rescue Department is proposing that Roanoke
County provide a $50,000 grant that would be used toward the
purchase of a $200,000 heavy-squad truck. The organization has
received funding commi tments from several businesses and will
raise the additional funds through community and business
solicitations.
Chief Fuqua advised that the Hollins Fire
Department will pay one-half of the total cost upon delivery of
the vehicle and will pay the balance over the following five
years.
Captain Wirt has also requested that Roanoke County
provide $25,000 now and $5,000 per year over the following five
years.
Supervisor McGraw suggested that purchases such as this
could be coordinated among the surrounding jurisdictions so that
there are no duplication of expenses for the same equipment.
Chief Fuqua also updated the Board on plans for the new
Bonsack Fire station.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the matching funds
grant.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF
12 4
September 12, 1989
REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA
t:::::=
Supervisor McGraw requested a separate vote for each
petition.
1. Ordinance to change the zoning classification
of a .409 acre tract of real estate located
at 5449 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 98-02-2-
9) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District
from the zoning classification of B2 to the
zoning classification of B3 with conditions
and a special exception upon the application
of Eagle Equipment Company.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading and
pUblic hearing of the ordinance.
The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
2. Ordinance to change the zoning classification
of a .493 acre tract of real estate located
northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek
Road and Valleypointe Parkway in the Hollins
Magisterial District from the zoning
classification of A-l to the zoning
classification of M-l with conditions and a
special exception upon the application of
Lingerfelt Development Corporation.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading and
public hearing date for the ordinance. The motion was seconded
by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
September 12, 1989
12 5
IN RE:
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
=
k Ordinance requestinq vacation of a 90rtion of a
slope easement. varyinq in width from 30 to 50 feet. Fairway
Forest Estates. Windsor Hills Maqisterial District.
Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey
presented the staff report. There was no discussion and no one
was present to speak.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Ordinance requesting vacation of a 10 foot
waterline easement.
Odgen Professional Park.
Cave Spr ing
Maqisterial District.
Mr. Covey presented the staff report.
There was no
discussion and no one was present to speak.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
~ Ordinance reauesting vacation of a 12 foot public
utility easement. Castle Rock West Subdivision. Windsor Hills
12 6
September 12, 1989
~
Maqisterial District.
Mr. Covey presented the staff report.
==
There was no
discussion and no one was present to speak on the ordinance.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
L.. Ordinance requestinq vacation of a stormwater
manaqement easement and access easement. Montclair Estate
Subdivision. Catawba Maqisterial District.
Mr. Covey presented the staff report. In response to a
question from Supervisor McGraw, Mr. Covey replied this would be
an improved drainage system. No one was present to speak on the
ordinance.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Ordinance amendinq Section 12.34 of the Roanoke
County Code to prevent payment of fines assessed under this
section without proof of purchase of a County license decal.
Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance will require
that violators who have not purchased the required motor vehicle
September 12, 1989
12 7
-:
decal must now provide evidence that the decal has been purchased
which in turn provides proof that personal property tax has been
~
paid.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor MCGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, MCGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Ordinance amendinq and readopting Chapter 12.
Motor Vehicles and Traffic. Section 12-8. of the Roanoke County
Code: adoptinq provisions of Title 46.2 and 18.2 of the Code of
Virqinia.
Mr.
Mahoney
advised
that
this
ordinance will
incorporate into the Roanoke County Code amendments that were
passed in
the 1989 General Assembly session. There was no discussion and
no one was present to speak to the ordinance.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor RObers, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Ordinance amendinq Sections 4-90. 4-97. 4-100 and
4-102. and repealinq Section 4-101 of Article V. Binqo Games and
Raffles of Chapter 4. Amusements.
128';'
September 12, 1989
Mr. Mahoney presented the staff report advising that
these amendments include who can be involved in Bingo and Raffle
activities and accounting certifications for certain Bingo games.
It will bring the County Code into compliance with the state
Code. There was no discussion and no one was present to speak on
the ordinance.
-
===
,
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor JOhnson,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE;
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
~ Public Hearinq and FIrst Readinq of Ordinance
concerninq issuance of not to exceed $1.115.000 qeneral
obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for
school purposes.
Finance Director Diane Hyatt presented the report
advising that the purpose of these bonds is to fund asbestos
abatement and other major renovations. Due to time restrictions
placed by the VPSA calendar, she requested that the Board
dispense with second reading and adopt the ordinance.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading,
dispense with the second reading and adopt the prepared
ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor JOhnson, and
September 12, 1989
12 9
=
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
AN ORDINANCE 91289-11 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
$1,115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS, SERIES
1989,OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary and
expedient to borrow $1,115,000 and to issue its general
obligation bonds therefor ("Bonds") to finance certain capital
projects for school purposes.
The County has held a pUblic hearing on the issuance of
the Bonds in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.1-
171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia
Code").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board
of Supervisors hereby determines that it is advisable to contract
a debt and to issue and sell the Bonds in the amount of
$1,115,000 for the purpose of financing certain capital projects
for school purposes. The issuance and sale of the Bonds upon
terms established pursuant to this Ordinance is authorized.
2 . Sale of Bonds. It is determined to be in the best
interest of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to accept
the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") to
purchase the Bonds at par, upon the terms established pursuant to
this Ordinance. The appropriate officers of the County are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into a bond sale
agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to
the VPSA ("Bond Sale Agreement").
3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in
fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole
multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and
delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "County of Roanoke
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1989", and shall bear
interest payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15,
13 0
September 12, 1989
-
beginning June ~5, 1990, at the rates established in accordance
with paragraph 4 of this Ordinance, and shall mature on December
15 in the years and amounts set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement.
So long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds,
the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten
bond substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A. On 20
days' written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at
its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000
or any integral multiple, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange
for the temporary typewritten Bond.
4. Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby
authorized and directed to accept the maturities and the interest
rate or rates on the Bonds established by VPSA, provided that
such interest rate or rates shall be such that the true interest
cost of the Bonds to the County shall not exceed 9% per annum.
As required by Section 15.1-186 (a) of the Virginia Code, the
estimated interest rate on the Bonds is 7.0% and the estimated
interest charges required to retire the Bonds is $1,014,650.
5. Payment: payinq Aqent and Reqistrar. For so long as the
VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds the following
provisions shall apply:
(a) all paYments of principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available
funds to VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable June 15,
December 15, or redemption date, or if such date is not a
business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of
Virginia, then at or before 11: 00 a.m. on the business day
preceding such payment date;
(b) all overdue payments of principal or interest shall bear
interest at the applicable interest rate on the Bonds; and
(c) Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is designated as Bond
Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds.
=
6. Redemption. The Bonds are subject to optional
redemption upon the terms and at the redemption prices set forth
in the form of Bond attached as Exhibit A. So long as the Bonds
are held by VPSA, the Bonds shall not be subject to redemption
prior to maturity without the prior written consent of the VPSA.
7. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman and the Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors are authorized and directed to execute
appropriate negotiable Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of
$1,115,000 and to affix the seal of the County thereto. The
manner of execution and affixation of the seal may be by
facsimile, provided, however, that if the signatures of the
===¡
===¡
,
September 12, 1989
13 1
Chairman and the Clerk are both by facsimile, the Bonds shall not
be valid until signed at the foot thereof by the manual signature
of the Bond Registrar.
8. Pledqe of Full Faith and Credit. The full faith and
credi t of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged for the
paYment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the
Bonds as the same become due and payable. There shall be levied
and collected annually on all locally taxable property in the
County an ad valorem tax sufficient to pay such principle,
premium, if any, and interest as the same respectively become due
and payable unless other funds are lawfully available and
appropriated for the timely paYment thereof.
9. School Board Approval. The Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors is hereby authorized and directed to cause a
certified copy of this Ordinance to be presented to the School
Board of the County. The Bonds hereby authorized shall not be
issued by the Board of Supervisors until the School Board of the
County shall have adopted an appropriate resolution consenting to
the issuance of the Bonds.
10. Non-Arbitraqe Certificate and Tax Covenants. The
appropriate officers and agents of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate
and Tax Covenants setting forth the expected use and investment
of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may
be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of
Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
applicable regulations relating to "arbitrage bonds." The Board
of Supervisors of the County covenants on behalf of the County
that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be
invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage
Certificate and Tax Covenants and that the County shall comply
with the other covenants and representations contained therein.
11. Proceeds Aqreement. The appropriate officers of the
County are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver
a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment
of proceeds of the Bonds among the County, the other participants
in the VPSA bond sale, the VPSA, Public Financial Management,
Inc., as investment manager and Central Fidelity Bank, as
depository.
12. Filing of Ordinance and Publication of Notice. The
appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this
Ordinance to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County and
within ten days thereafter to câuse to be published once in a
newspaper having general circulation in the County a notice
setting forth ( 1) in brief and general terms the purposes for
13 2
September 12, 1989
WhiCh the Bonds are to be issued and (2) the amount of such
Bonds.
1==
F=
,
13. Further Actions. Each member of the Board of
Supervisors and all other officers, employees and agents of the
County are hereby authorized to take such action as they or any
one of them may consider necessary or desirable in connection
wi th the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action
previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed.
14. Effective Date. The Board of Supervisors, in accordance
with Section 18.04 of the County's Charter dispenses with the
requirement of two readings of this Ordinance. This Ordinance
shall be an emergency measure and shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance and
dispense with the second reading, seconded by Supervisor Johnson,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
~ Ordinance authorizinq the sale of .47+ acres in
Southwest Industrial Park
There was no discussion of the ordinance.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by. Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
ORDINANCE 91289-12 ACCEPTING AN
OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF .47 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE
SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
September 12, 1989
13 3 ~,
==
==9 -
1.
That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01
of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been
declared to be surplus and is being made available for other
pUblic uses, i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04
of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on
August 22, 1989; and a second reading was held on September 12,
1989, concerning the sale and disposition of .47 acre, more or
less, in the Southwest Industrial Park; and
3. That offers having been received for said
property, the offer of Timothy J. Thielecke to purchase .47 acre,
more or less, for $11,750 is hereby accepted and all other offers
are rejected; and
4.
estate are to
and
5.
execute such
That all proceeds from the sale of this real
be allocated to the capital reserves of the County;
That the County Administrator is authorized to
documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion
of
Supervisor
Nickens,
seconded by
Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
~ Ordinance authorizinq sale of 5.039 + acres in
13 4
September 12, 1989
~
~e Southwest Industrial Park.
¡::::=
There was no discussion of this ordinance.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared
ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
ORDINANCE 91289-13 ACCEPTING AN
OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF 5.039 ACRES, HORE OR LESS, IN
THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County,. Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01
of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been
declared to be surplus and is being made available for other
public uses, i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04
of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on
August 22, 1989; and a second reading was held on September 12,
1989, concerning the sale and disposition of 5.039 acres, more or
less, in the Southwest Industrial Park; and
3. That offers having been received for said
property, the offer of Gorman Howell and Sidney Maupin Jr. to
purchase 5.039 acres, more or less, for $144,872 is hereby
accepted and all other offers are rejected; and
September 12, 1989
13 5
---<
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real
estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County.
The expenditure of a portion of these proceeds for road and
utility improvements to Southwest Industrial Park is hereby
authorized; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
~ Adoption of Ordinance amending Article III. Sewer
Use Standards. of Chapter 16. of the Roanoke County Code.
Utility Director Clifford Craig advised that the 1972
Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and Roanoke
County requires the County to adopt the same ordinances and
regulations that conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared
ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ORDINANCE 91289-14 AMENDING AND
13 6 September 12, 1989
REENACTING ORDINANCE 62486-146,
"SEWER USE STANDARDS" OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING CERTAIN EXISTING
PROVISIONS AND ENACTING NEW
PROVISIONS TO IMPROVE AND INCREASE
PROTECTIVE PROGRAMS
¡----
: '
WHEREAS, the ci ty of Roanoke owns and operates the
Roanoke Regional Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County is a user of the Roanoke
Regional Treatment Plant and is required to establish and enforce
a pretreatment program as required by the united states
Environmental Protection Agency; and
WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between
Roanoke City and Roanoke County requires the County to adopt such
ordinances and regulations to conform to those of the City as
required by EPA; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 18 of the recently recodified Roanoke
County Code (1985) incorporates the provisions of Chapter 16 of
the 1971 Roanoke County Code; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Ordinance 62486-146
adopted on June 24, 1986, in order to meet the requirements of
the State Water Control Board, the EPA, and the aforesaid
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on August 22, 1989; the second reading of this ordinance was held
on September 12, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
September 12, 1989
137,_
~
1.
That Article III. Chapter 16 of the Roanoke
-
County Code of 1971 (Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of
1985) be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted to read and
provide as follows:
Chapter 16.
Article III. Sewer Use Standards
Sec. 16-44. Definitions.
For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases
set out in this section shall have the following meanings:
* * * *
Discharqe - Any introduction of substances into the
sanitary sewer.
* * * *
Industrial user - Any govcrnmcntal user of publicly
owned treatment works identified in the Standard Industrial
Classification Manual, ~ 1987, Office of Management and
Budget, as amended and supplemented, under divisions A, B, D, E,
and I, including governmental facilities that discharge
wastewater to the plant.
* * * *
Interference A discharqe which. alone or in
coni unction with a discharqe or discharqes from other sources.
(1) inhibits or disrupts the plant. its treatment processes or
operations. or its sludge processes. use or disposal; or (2)
causes a violation of the plant's VPDES permit.
* * * *
National categorical pretreatment standard or
pretreatment standard means any regulations containing pollutant
discharge limits promulgated by the EPA in accordance with
Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. ~ 1317) and 40
C.F.R. Subchapter N (Parts 401-471) as amended. which applies to
a specific category of industrial users.
"* * * *
Pass throuqh - A discharge which exits the plant into
water of the United states in quantities which may cause a
violation of the plant's VPDES permit.
* * * *
Sec. 16-45. General Requirements.
(a) All discharges into public sewers shall conform
to requirements of this article; however, the federal categorical
13 8
September 12, 1989
-
pretreatment standards or any standards imposed by the state
water control board or its successor in authority are hereby
incorporated by reference where applicable and where such
standards are hi!hcr more strinqent than those set forth in this
article.
1.gl
the approving
authorized to
discharqe.
* * * *
In the event of an emerqency. as determined bY
authority. the approvinq authority shall be
immediately halt any actual or threatened
lhl A person discharqinq in violation of the
provisions of this article. within thirty l30} days of the date
of such discharge. shall sample. analyze and submit the data to
the approvinq authority unless the approvinq authority elects to
perform such sampling.
Sec. 16-52. Discharge of substances capable of imairing, etc.
facilities.
* * * *
1.gl No person shall discharqe into the public sewers
9011utants which cause interference or pass through.
lhl No person shall discharge into the public sewers
pollutants with a hiqh flow rate or concentration of conventional
pollutants as to interfere with the 91ant.
Sec. 16-53. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to
reject discharges.
* * * *
ill No person shall utilize dilution as a means of
treatment.
Sec. 16-56.
discharges.
Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of
* * * *
(b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement,
test, sampling, or analysis required to be made hereunder shall
be made in accordance with the lateot edition of "St;lndard
Methodo for Examination of WAter ;lnd W;lote\iater, " publiohed
jointly by the Amerioûn Publio He;llth Aooooiûtion, the Amerioûn
Water Worko Aooooiûtion and the Water rollution Control
Federation. 40 C.F.R. Part 136. as amended.
* * * *
(e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly
refrigerated and composited in proportion to the flow for a
representative twenty-four (24) hour sample. For oil and qrease.
pH. phenols. cyanide. volatile toxic organic and other
September 12, 1989
13 9
-
appropriate pollutants. property arab sampling shall be
performed. Such sampling shall be repeated on as many days as
necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire
reporting period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in
quantities of wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced
automatically by the flow-measuring device.
* * * *
lil All owners of facilities qoverned by this article
shall COm91Y with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R.
403.12. as amended. which is incorporated bv reference herein.
including. without limitation. the siqnatory: certification and
record keepinq requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12(c). (d). (i)~ and
(1). All records shall be retained for a minimum of three _ears
and this retention period shall be extended durinq litiqation or
upon request of the approvinq authority.
Sec. 16-57. Discharge permits for industrial waste.
(a) The County may, in its sole discretion, grant a
non-transferable permit to discharge to industrial users who meet
the criteria of this chapter, provided that the industry:
* * * *
(5) Complies with the requirements of federal
categorical standards, where applicable, including the
development of any required compliance schedules or the
applicable provisions of this article.
1& The approvinq authority shall have the riqht to
accept or re1ect any increases in flow or pollutants under
existinq or new µermits.
-
Sec. 16-64. Right of entry to enforce article.
(a) The approving authority and other duly authorized
employees of the county bearing proper credentials and
identification shall be authorized to enter any public or private
property at any reasonable time for the purpose of enforcing this
article for sampling purposes. inspect monitorinq equipment and
to inspect and copy all documents relevant to the enforcement of
this article. includinq. without limitation. monitorinq reports.
Anyone acting under this authority shall observe the
establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal
security, and fire protection.
* * * *
1.Ql Appropriate information submitted to the
approving authority pursuant to these regulations excluding any
information utilized in determing effluent limits may be claimed
as confidential by the submitter at the time of submission by
stamping the words "confidential business information" on each
paqe containinq such information. If a claim is asserted. the
information shall be treated in accordance with applicable law.
1 4 0 -~
September 12, 1989
-
-
Sec. 16-66. Notice of violations.
The County shall serve persons discharging in
violation of this article with written notice stating the nature
of the violation and pr~·iãing a time limit of ninety (90) ãaya
for aatiafaotor}· oomplianoe, if no eWJironmantal de~radation
oooura ao a reault of the violation. The appro"Jin~ authority
ohall have the right to reduoe the time required to obtain
oatiofaotory oomplianoe, depending an tho amount of on\·ironmental
de~radntion ooourring ao a reoult of the ....iolation. requiring
immediate satisfactory compliance.
The approving authority shall have the authority to
publish annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or
a news9aper of qeneral circulation in the Roanoke area a list of
persons which were not in compliance with the terms of this
Article at least once during the twelve (12) previous months.
Sec. 16-67. Penalty for violations.
(~) A perDon who oontinueD prohibited dioohnrgeo,
beyond the time preDoribed in tho notioe given purounnt to
seotion 16 66, for the firot time ia guilty of a miodemennor nnd
upon oon\·iotion io puniDhnble by a fine of not more thnn biO
hundred dollarc ($200) for eaoh not of violntion and for onoh dny
of viol~tion. The Deoond nnd DubDequent offenDec are punichable
by a fine of five hundred dollnrc ($500) for each act of
....iolation and for each day of the violation. After the third
offence, the approving authority ahall hn7c the right to
terminate the cewer ~nd water conneotion.
~ A person who violates the provisions of this
article shall be QUilty of a class 1 misdemeanor and upon
conviction is punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars
($1. 000) per violation per day and confinement in j ail for not
more than twelve months. ei ther or both. In the event of a
violation. the approvinq authority shall also have the right to
terminate the sewer and water connection.
(b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-
section (a) of this section, the county is entitled to pursue all
other criminal and civil remedies to which it is entitled under
authority of state statutes or other ordinances of the county
against a person continuing prohibited discharges, includinq.
without limitation. injunctive relief.
Sec. 16-69. Public access to data.
Effluent data
authority's pretreatment
complied
proqram
as part
shall be
of the approving
available to the
September 12, 1989
1" 1
===::j
===j
public.
2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after October 1, 1989.
On motion
of Supervisor
Nickens,
seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor Johnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE;
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: Expressed sYmpathy upon the death
of former Board member May Johnson and directed that the family
be contacted at the appropriate time to attend a board meeting
for appropriate recognition of Mrs. Johnson's contributions.
SUPERVISOR ROBERS: Congratulated the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission on the success of the Airport gala held on
September 8 and on the opening ceremonies of the new terminal.
SUPERVISOR NICIŒNS:
Discussed the impact on the
proposed Police Department on the Town of Vinton.
Supervisor Nickens moved the Board pass a prepared
resolution amended with the inclusion under No. 1 that Roanoke
County will assure the Town of Vinton that there will be no loss
of funding if a Police Department is established, and that the
resolution be sent to Vinton Town Officials.
The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following
recorded vote:
1 4 2 -~
September 12, 1989
~
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
1==
NAYS:
None
R-9l289-l5
RESOLUTION 91289-15 CONCERNING THE IMPACT
OF A POLICE DEPARTMENT ON THE TOWN
OF VINTON
WHEREAS, On August 22, 1989, the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted a resolution requesting the
Circui t Court of Roanoke County to order an election on the
question of establishing a police force in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the Board has also requested that the General
Assembly take the necessary action to ensure that Roanoke County
receives the same level of funding that it receives if a pOlice
department is established; and
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to assure the Town of Vinton
that there will be no negative impact on its law enforcement if a
police department is established.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1.
a.
That the General Assembly be requested to
take the necessary action to ensure that the
Town of Vinton receives the same level of
funding as it currently receives, and
b. that Roanoke County assures the Town of
Vinton that it will lose no funding.
2. That any mutual aid agreements presently in force
September 12, 1989
14 3 ~
-
between the Town of Vinton and the County of
Roanoke will continue.
-
3.
That
the
Roanoke
County
Administrator
be
authorized to negotiate an interjurisdictional
agreement with the appropriate officials in the
Town of Vinton whereby the Roanoke County may
extend law enforcement coverage into the Town of
Vinton and the Town of Vinton may extend law
enforcement coverage into the County of Roanoke.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with inclusion of
amendment #l.b, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW:
Announced he had met with the
Grayson Commission.
He expressed concern that the Commission
will not put forth strong incentives for cooperation and
consolidation.
SUPERVISOR GARRETT: Commended Supervisor McGraw on his
work with the Grayson Commission.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
R-91289-l6
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent Agenda
after discussion on Items 1 and 3.
Supervisor Nickens asked what the limitation was on
14 4
September 12, 1989
~
cash wlnn1ngs ot a raffle permit. He asked that the Oak Grove
Elementary School be informed of the limit for the jackpot.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
-
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, MCGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION NO. 91289-16 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for September 12, 1989, designated as Item L
- consent Agenda, be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated as
Item 1 - 6, inclusive, as follows:
1.
Authorization to begin
proceedings to enforce
Queen's Court Subdivision.
appropriate legal
agreement concerning
2.
Approval of Raffle Permit
School.
Cave Spring High
3. Approval of Raffle Permit - Oak Grove Elementary
School P.T.A.
LETTER TO OAK GROVE PTA SHOULD EMPHASIZE THAT
MAXIMUM JACKPOT SHOULD NOT EXCEED $1,000.
4. Appropriation of federal grant funds to the 1989-
90 Roanoke County Schools' Budget.
5. Acceptance of 0.32 miles of Fallowater Lane, into
the VDOT Secondary System.
September 12, 1989
1" 5
--..
6.
Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Danford M. DeShields, Jr. and Fannie
Hope DeShields.
====;
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Items L-l and L-3
removed for discussion, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisor Johnson, RObers, MCGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN REi
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. Alfred Powell, 3440 Franklin Street, spoke in
opposition to the Police Department referendum.
He expressed
concern about the fact that the issue was not included in the
published agenda which meant that citizens did not have an
opportunity to speak to the issue. He felt that the Board used
dissatisfaction with the current Sheriff to eliminate an elected
officials.
Supervisor Johnson responded to Mr. Powell's comments
and advised that the voters will have an opportunity to determine
what will be best in the referendum to establish a police
department.
The other board members also responded and
Supervisor Nickens expressed appreciation to Mr. Powell for his
interest and participation.
14 6
..
September 12, 1989
-
===
.u" !US;
REPORTS
supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the
following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens~ Garrett
NAYS:
None
1. Board Contingency Fund.
2. Capital fund Unappropriated Balance.
3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance.
4. Statement of Expenditures and Income Analysis for
month of July 3l, 1989.
5. Accounts Paid - August, 1989
6. Report on impact of County Police Department on
the Town of vinton.
IN REi
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 5: 17 p. m. , Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) 7,
to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of
legal advice concerning Consolidation; and 2.1-344 (a) 3, to
discuss the disposition of publicly held real estate for economic
development purposes.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
September 12, 1989
147
-----.
-----.
R-9l289-l7
At 5:45 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to return to Open
Session and adoption of a resolution certificating Executive
Session.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor JOhnson, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION R-9l289-l7 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE
MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF
VIRGINIA
WHEREAS,
the
Board
of
Supervisors
of
Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on
this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in
accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of
Information Act; and
WHEREAS,
Section
2. 1-344.1 of the Code of
Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting were
conducted in conformity with Virginia Law.
NOW, THEREFORE
BE
IT
RESOLVED, that the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that,
to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully
exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were
discussed in the executive meeting which this certification
14 8
September 12, 1989
-
resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion convening the executive meeting
were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote:
, .
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
At 5:17 p.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
. ..r.~:\I,~'
f;':
!':
ga~l(
Garrett, Chairman
-