The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8/11/1987 - Regular 060 August 11, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 August 11, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke Count Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and th first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of August, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 2:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Steven A.McGraw <arrived at 2:10 p.m.> STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for 061 August 11, 1987 . __._M_W. _..~ '__~"'.__.""_"_ "....,..... __" .. _..._. __. ._H_. .. _ ~ ~_ _._.._._.____~_ O'___W."..__ _.__,__.,_". ~--_._- _. . ~__,~____,,-,~,__,_,_","_,__~____,~__"____"_~,W_~,_'___',,_._'-W_._··".,__ - Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; James T. Nininger, Chief Building Official, Ron Edwards, Fire & Rescue Department; Reta Busher, Director of Management & Budget; Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities; John Willey, Director of Real Estate Assessment; Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Department IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend David L. Wade, Bonsack United Methodist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Elmer Hodge announced that Linda Lehe, Assistant County County is replacing County Attorney Paul Mahoney who is on vacation. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF GENDA Mr. Hodge announced that Item E-5, Protest of Bid by Valley Communications has been withdrawn. He also added Item E-6, a resolution of support for a direct access road between Blacksburg and the Roanoke Valley, and Item H-5, First Reading of Ordinance concerning the sale of land on Route 11-460. r062 August 11, 1987 ......... IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. A roval of Fundin for Cultural Enrichment Organizations: Supervisor Brittle announced that due to his involvement in the Acting Company, he will abstain from a vote in this matter. Mr. Hodge noted that $20,000 has been included in the budget to fund cultural programs. This year, three agencies have requested funding: Center in the Square, the Arts Council of Roanoke Valley, and the Roanoke Symphony. Representatives were present from all three organizations. Speaking on behalf of these organizations were Susan Cole, Executive Director of the Arts Council of Roanoke Valley, Margarite Fourcroy, General Manager of the Roanoke Symphony, an William S. Hubard, General Manager of Center in the Square. The described the activities and events planned by their groups. Supervisor Nickens moved that $15,000 be allocated to Center in the Square, and $2500 each to the Arts Council and the Roanoke Symphony. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGra and carried by the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Brittle Þ·063 August 11, 1987 -_._----"".--~_._.._"........_.~..~_._---._.--- .~~..._- .'.. .. '. ...__" ~.'.., ______~_ ._.___.__ M______~ _.__ ,_,^_ _.__.._.___.~__.",.._._._.. '._' _'~""" ,., _ '___',___'^" .'~ _...... . . -----.-- - -,..._---,--.- . _._.,---,._-_.._"._,-----,--_.__..._-~."'---~.__..._---- ..._ _.'_W·__··_.'_'"·_··'··_··_·· _...._....__. _ ~ ,. .._,__. 2. Approval to provide off-site water facilities to Appalachian Power Company: Supervisor McGraw announced his intention to abstain from this vote. Director of Utilities Clifford Craig reported that Appalachian Power Company is developing their service center site north of the 4l9-Loch Haven Road intersection. They have drilled a test well for water and found there is not sufficient quality or quantity for their purposes. Therefore, they are requesting county water. The estimated cost of the water facilities is $310,000. Appalachian Power Company has requested that Roanoke County participating in the funding of the water line. Staff has proposed the use of water revenue bonds and the County's share would be $115,540. It is anticipated that within the next five years the County will collect over $500,000 in ff-site facilities fees in this section, and the costs will be ecovered. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff ecommenda tion . The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Nickens, Johnson None BSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw 3. Request for allocation of funds for storm sewer onstruction on 0 den Road (Route 867): Mr. Hodge advised that 064 August 11, 1987 until recently, the Highway Department covered the cost of roa expansion and curb and guttering, if necessary. This polic has changed, and they now require local participation for suc things as curb and guttering. VDOT is requesting that the Count fund their share of the curb and guttering at a cost of $10,200 Supervisor Nickens expressed concern at a procedur that calls for the County to install curb and guttering unles absolutely necessary. Mr. Hodge responded that hopefully, othe road projects will be handle3d differently, but it will b necessary to pay a share for the Odgen Road project because of a lack of shoulder. Supervisor Nickens moved to appropriate $10,200 for the curb and guttering for the Ogden Road project. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: RESOLUTION 81187-3 REQUESTING APPROPRIATION FOR ROANOKE COUNTY SHARE OF STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION, OGDEN ROAD (ROUTE 867) PROJECT WHEREAS, Ogden Road (Route 867) provides an important urban highway link to commercial property in Roanoke County; and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors desires to improve this commercial link; and WHEREAS, Route 867 was placed on the Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan by the Roanoke County Board of 065 August 11, 1987 -----'."--,,.---.....---.-----." --~----,---._.,-- .._-,- .--..-----......-.--..,.-.-.-.., '"~'.- --_._---'---~---- ------- --- - ---- - --- - -" -~------ -- - - - - Supervisors and was assigned a project number of 0867-080-202,C50l, by the Virginia Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, Virginia Department of Transportation Policy Memorandum DPM-8-6 requires participation by localities for portions of storm sewer construction costs if curb and gutter "is desired"; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has determined that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is responsible for $10,200 on Project 0867-080-202,C50l for its portion of storm sewer construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appropriates the sum of $10,200 for its share of the total construction cost for the Ogden Road Project 0867-080-202,C50l. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Request from the School Board to appropriate funding for positions at the Governor's School: Superintendent of Schools Bayes Wilson reported that they have been investigating possible sources of funds for additional positions in the Governor's School. The School Board is requesting that 066 August 11, 1987 the board authorize the use of $18,000 from last year's school budget to carryover and finance the additional positions for the Governor's School. Mr. Wilson also requested that money in the School Bus Fund also be carried over to this year. Supervisor Nickens supported the proposal but expresse concern that the board was amending the school budget a month into the fiscal year. Supervisor Nickens moved to allocate the necessary monies to fund the Governor's School positions, and that any funds remaining be allocated to the School Bus Fund moved. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None 5. Protest of Bid by Valley Communications: item was withdrawn. 6. Re uest from Town of Blacksbur for resolution of support for an access road between Roanoke Valley and VPI&SU: Chairman Johnson announced that he had talked with the Mayor of Blacksburg and Town Manager and they had discussed fully the three options that the town has to alleviate the traffic between the Roanoke Valley and Blacksburg. The plan the board is being asked to support is the shortest route, and there will be very little dislocation of existing homes and businesses. This 067 August 11, 1987 -,---,._._,-,._...__.~.,. -,-. __~._',.".....__._.',..,_.~._ _._, '. " . . "."~ '".. _OÚ' ..__.._.._._..__..__....__"._....__.. _""'~"'___..' _.,. _,.... u___.... -- ---'~'--'-'---'-'- -. -~'-'~-.__._-'_"_- ---r· . --.------.-.....---.- ....--..--......---. ...... -...........-. . ... I Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared resolution supporting the option concerning Route 641. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: RESOLUTION 81187-5 ENDORSING A DIRECT ACCESS ROAD BETWEEN BLACKSBURG AND THE ROANOKE VALLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, The Governor of Virginia has included as part of his economic development strategy for the Commonwealth the improvement of transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the lack of direct access to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University from the Roanoke alley is an obstacle to the continued economic development potential of the region; and WHEREAS, a study commissioned by the Town of Blacksburg IShOWS that a new road leading from the Virginia Tech Corporate ~esearch Center east to a point near the existing intersection of Iroute 641 with Interstate 81 is the best solution to the problems ssociated with the access of the Roanoke Valley to Blacksburg nd Virginia Tech. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors f Roanoke County that: 068 August ll, 1987 --- 1. The Board joins with the Town of Blacksburg an Virginia Tech in requesting that the Commonwealth Transportatio Board and the Virginia Department of Transportation accept th corridor solution the Town of Blacksburg has identified as th best answer to the needs of the Commonwealth, and provide th funds necessary for timely completion of the project; and 2 . The Clerk to the Board is directed to mail copie of this resolution to members of the Commonwealth Transportatio Board. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Superviso Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizin the transfer of Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation: Assistant County Attorney Linda Lehe reported thi ordinance is to facilitate the completion of the Hollins Projec by turning over to the Development Corporation that water system This is necessary in order to receive the grant from the Farmer Home Administration. 069 August 11, 1987 _._----.._._,-~.,._._~-..__.- .. ~ .__.._.._,~. .,.........,____. u.....__""_" . - .__.__._._~~- - ---f ou_______________.____._________.._..__ ---.. -- -.. - .. --. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve --.-'.--.-,.."..-.,,----- . the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson ¡NAYS: None 2. Ordinance authorizing, ratifying and confirming the acquisition and execution of leases for the Enhanced Emergency 911 Communication System: Ms. Lehe stated this ordinance requests board approval to obtain sites to locate 911 communications equipment. The staff has negotiated with the property owners and the sites are suitable for this purpose. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. Supervisor Garrett seconded the motion. Supervisor Nickens was concerned that the report did not specify the costs involved with the acquisitions and leases, such as the cost of the electric bill for the Poor Mountain site and amount of the lease agreement for the Windy Gap acreage. Mr. Hodge responded that the electric bill will cover the blinking lights on the tower and lights for the storage facility. Ron Edwards, Fire and Rescue Department, stated that the lease for the Windy Gap site will be approximately $150 a month, for five years with an automatic renewal. Supervisor Johnson advised that he would prefer a longer lease because of the potential cost in the future. J 070 August 11, 1987 Ms. Lehe stated one of the problems with the Windy Gap lease is a title dispute between two adjacent property owners and the dispute has prevented the staff from finalizing the terms. The two property owners are in the process of settling this dispute. Mr. Edwards added that one of the property owners may not be willing to settle, but the other owner is willing to work with the County. Supervisor Garrett was concerned about the unanswered questions concerning these leases and asked if there were alternatives if these did not work out. Mr. Edwards responded AYES: NAYS: they are investigating other options. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None 3. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of real estate, the remainder of Mountain View Farm Technological Park: Ms. Lehe reported that the County has an offer to purchase the remainder of the land available for sale. The land is currently zoned M-l. Eight acres will be reserved for recreational purposes. John Willey, Director of Real Estate Assessments was present and reaffirmed that the property is surplus. 071 August 11, 1987 --_._--_.._-_.._---,--,.~-- -~..~.__.-."--..'_..,,._.".,.__.--_..,,- ..---...-..-., -.... '"'.'~' '.,- ---..-.-~--.._-.._.,._~_..__._~___,._ _..__ .,."..~.._ "0._' _ ·_,ß...'._.....__,,·..._ ~---_._--_. ._--~,._----- ---'-Jr .. . II I __~_._._."_" ._...._ on Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett an carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Ordinance amendin ter 7 "Buildin of the Roanoke Count Code to ado t a new Article V, "Buildin Numbers": Ms. Lehe advised that this ordinance is essential to the 911 project. It establishes the requirements for homeowners and business to place in a conspicuous location the numbers of their buildings to assist vehicles in responding to ca 11 s . Enforcement of the ordinance is the responsibility of the Chief Building Official, and James Nininger was present to respond to questions. Supervisor Brittle was concerned that the public will not be aware of the requirements of this ordinance, and since the effective date is September 8th, he wanted the issue discussed fully before proceeding to second reading. He also requested assurance that the requirement be advertised so the public will be aware of the ordinance. Supervisor McGraw asked Ms. Lehe what the liability to II the County was if a homeowner installed the proper sign and it I fell off and the fire department could not find the house. Ms. Lehe responded that she felt that by requiring the homeowner to 072 August 11, 1987 affix the number to the house, the County was actually removin themselves from liability. Supervisor Johnson inquired what the fine was. Ms. Leh advised that this ordinance will be part of the County Buildin Code and this would be a Class 1 misdemeanor with a fine up t $1,000. In response to a question from Supervisor Garret concerning whether these numbers could be on mailboxes, Chie Tommy Fuqua stated that in some areas mailboxes are groupe together on one side of the street. He also pointed out tha putting the number on the curb would not suffice because snow, leaves or parked automobiles could obstruct the view. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of th ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. Supervisor Brittle stated he was still concerned abou whether the public will understand, and requested that the effective date be changed to allow ample opportunity to infor the citizens. Supervisor McGraw made a substitute motion to continue the first reading until the next meeting so that these concerns may be addressed. Mr. Hodge reminded the board that there will be two weeks until the next meeting which will give the staff time to answer the board's questions. He also pointed out that information had already been sent to the citizens telling them of 073 August 11, 1987 ----~-" ._~---_.>_.._.'----'.'--' ..._._".,..,,__.,^"_..____>.__'._..___..'.' __.,__".._",__,_._ .,h'_,,_._" __._,,__,,_., _"_.._._.' _..__~__._ ___ <·.__··___·"·.'__'.__.~_._~._.·_.._,,__.·_··+_'_._M_'_~U_·.··_.".·.^,.~_~,_..__'__ --~------_..-_.__.__._,----. -----r ---------------------- -------------- ----.--.-- - - -. - -_.-.--.--- '~he importance of putting numbers on their buildings. The rffective date could also be changed to give the citizens time to pnderstand the ordinance. I Don Reid from C&P Telephone was present and advised the oard that they will be sending inserts with bills through the onth of September and October_reminding their customers of 911. e will check with C&P and see if they could also include 'nformation about the building number ordinance. Supervisor Johnson directed the staff to make the ecessary changes prior to the second reading. Supervisor rittle also directed the staff to advertise these requirements. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None 5. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing he sale of real estate ad'acent to Fort Lewis Fire Station on U. Route 11-460: Ms. Lehe announced that the County has eceived an offer concerning property adjacent to Fort Lewis Fire ta tion . The tract is 3-l/3 acres and is zoned B-l. This offer received too late to include in the prepared agenda. Supervisor Nickens stated this was across from Shamrock and is used in conjunction with the park. He understood hat the County had made a commitment to the residents in the 074 August 11, 1987 ~-_.__..~- -.-.- area not to sell the property until other recreational facilitie Supervisor Nickens moved to table this issue until th would be available for them. He also questioned bringing this u without having proper notice in the public agenda. Mr. Hodg suggested that this item be continued for two weeks to allow fa proper public notice. next meeting. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw an carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance a a reement between the Cit of Salem and the Count of Roanoke annexation of certain territories of Roanoke County: Supervisor Nickens stated that since this was discusse at the last board meeting and there is no opposition, he move approval of the second reading. The motion was seconded b Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 81187-6 APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALEM AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE REGARDING 075 August ll, 1987 _.__._--_.__.~-,.,- ~.,___ ..._____,..~ .".~_~_..._ ___",.._..,'..__"_._.._~.,___..^.._,. ,'_"" _..__m..'__.___'"_ ,...,.-,.....--.-.-<........, ._.. --_.._--,,~-_.._.._..__._,-,-_....._.,~....~_. _.~....,-..--.,-~~"----..,._._",,.-, '._-'.. .-..._,_....., '_.'-"._.,----- ---.-.--------. - --_.~.__. -"--"-r' - . ..---.-..-... ...-..-.------......-.--....---.---..--.........-.......-.....--.... r i ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORIES OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has executed an Agreement dated March 3, 1987, by and between the City of Salem and the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Commission on Local Government; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has advertised its inten- tion to approve this Agreement on July 14, 1987, and July 21, 1987, in the Roanoke Times & World News, a newspaper of general circulation in this jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this rdinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the respective localities are desirous of re- olving these issues. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Super- isors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Memorandum of Agree- ent dated March 3, 1987, a true copy of which is attached hereto nd incorporated herein, is hereby adopted and approved. I The County Attorney is hereby directed to petition the ~ircuit Court for an order establishing the rights of the respec- riVe local governments as set forth under the terms of this Agree- I 076 August 11, 1987 _.._..~ ment, and to take such other action as may be necessary to accomp- lish these purposes. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain water systems: Ms. Lehe stated this ordinance will authorize the acquisition of five water systems and establishes the funding sources to acquire the systems. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 81187-7 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN WATER SYSTEMS WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein be accomplished by ordinance, and that the first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second read- ing on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County can provide a better, more com- plete water system by owning and operating all water systems in 077 August 11, 1987 -.--.--,-.-.-."-.--- .._~---,,- ,-~.. "-'--"-', ~'~..'.'..",-- .'-----..----,.-.---.--".---'.."' _._" .._.~_.¥.__..._._--.._- .."--, ~'_.__..__._-_.__.~---,.__..__.._-_._._- ~---_. ------~_.- - --.--- ---- -------------------------------- - .,._.._-"..,_.,.~.'".__._._,,_._- ~-'.---- --,,---- I the County, and can better satisfy public health, safety and we 1- fare standards and requirements; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County have expressed their support for the acquisition of water systems and wells through their positive votes for the 1985 and 1986 bond referen- da. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition of the following water systems within the funds and funding sources indicated is hereby approved and authorized: Water System Cherokee Hills Forest Edge Carriage Hills/Parker Crescent Heights Sherry Court Cost $ 67,000 131,000 35,000 60,000 6,300 Funding Source 1986 Bonds 1986 Bonds 1986 Bonds 1985 Bonds utility Fund 2. That an additional ten percent (10%) contingency account for legal, engineering, and miscellaneous expenses is hereby authorized. I 3. to take such actions and execute such documents, all upon a form That the County Administrator is hereby authorized approved by the County Attorney, as may be necessary to accomp- lish the purposes and intent of this ordinance. " On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson r 078 August 11, 1987 NAYS: Nickens 3. Ordinance vacatin the Plat of the Rams ate Court Subdivision: Supervisor Nickens advised that since this is the second reading and no one is present to speak in opposition he moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 81187-8 VACATING THE PLAT OF RAMSGATE COURT SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Jerry W. and Janat L. Bush have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the petitioners are the owners of the property constituting this subdivision, except for three (3) lots therein; and WHEREAS, a public hearing and first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivisionrecorded on March 3, 1973, and found in Plat Book 8, 079 August 11, 1987 ---~-_._-~-._._...."_.~.,. _...- -..---.-., ,"-' ~-',._-,_. -.", ..-.,..'..-.....---.,.,--...",.-.-.--"'..... ... .-~"._.._--_.__..- -^ -- -..-,.....- -.. ~ ...,--_._--~_.,----_._-~._--~-~.__.~.__.._~.-..'--. _____._, '_""__"_'"_~__'_'__'W "H_<' _ ,..___...".....,. '.'. " ..-.-"- ---..----.-..-. page 38, among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia is hereby vacated. 2. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court is authorized to take such action as may be necessary to accomplish the purpose and intent of this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor$ Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Ordinance amending Chapter 22 of the 1985 Roanoke County Code "Water" establishing requirements for the construction and testing of wells for public water supplies: No one was present to speak to this ordinance and there was no discussion as this was previously discussed on July 28, 1987. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: I None II I I construction of wells can adversely ORDINANCE NO. 81187-9 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE 1985 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "WATER" ESTABLISHING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTING AND TESTING OF WELLS FOR PUB- LIC WATER SUPPLIES WHEREAS, the Board finds that the improper affect aquifers as t-080 August 11, 1987 ------ groundwater resources in Roanoke County. Consistent with th duty to protect these groundwater resources and to safeguard th public welfare, safety, and health, it is declared to be th policy of Roanoke County to require that the construction an location of wells conform to reasonable requirements; and WHEREAS, the establishment of these requirements ar authorized by Section 15.1-292.2, Section 15.1-299 and Section 15.1-341, et seq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was hel on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance wa held on August 11, 1987. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Chapter 22 of the 1985 Roanoke County Code, "Water" (Chapter 20.1 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code) is hereb amended and reenacted as follows: Section 20.1-9 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code is here by repealed: WellB Bftall ffiee~ B~a~e re~~la~~e"B eR~B~~"~ aB e ~fte da~e e£ ee"B~r~e~~e"õ All wellB Bftall be ela~B ~ er ~~ wellB. ~eea~~eft e£ all well~ Bftall be BfteW" eft a ~la" e£ ~fte By~~effi. Eaeft well ~ftall fta~e ffi~"~ffi~ffi e"e-£e~r~ft ~"eft a~r l~fte ~e~ ~e ~ft de~~ft e£ ~fte ~~ffipõ A lew wa~er le~el eeft~rel Bftall be ~re~~ded. 081 Atl~tlf!l~ !!, !98:;I ,__'___.__,"'" .c'- ,.~ _... "._ ,_._._._.__. ~.,,~_"_."__ ',_' ^__.. ·.....'u __ .~_ . _.·___·m____.. _ ~ .,. _".~. .".._._ _ . _ . ___ -..-.-.--------- -.--.-.--.--....----..-. ._^ "._.._~>._._...".____.. ._"' _.~._.._'. u__'w·_·__·_ _. -----r . _.. '_'-'~-_.-- ~.-- ... -- ._- _ _ ._~u_._·_... '_''''__'..,,__~_ ._.,_...,._...... ,_..~".. ..-...-...-- _, _ ______w -- ,- - -- I A £e~~y-e:k~h~ hetl~ ~tlH\~ ~ef!l~ f!lha!! be reEïtl:kred en a!! we!!f!lõ terdõ Neõ !5!2õt and amended and reenacted: Section 20.1-9. Wells. Wells shall meet state and American Waterworks Associa- tion (A WWA A-lOO-84) regulations/standards existing as of the date of well construction. In addition to the State regulations, the following shall also be required: Location of all wells shall be shown on a plan of the water system. A minimum of two wells must be constructed and placed in service for all public water supply systems. Performance testing of wells shall be in accordance with AWWA A-lOO-84 Standard for water wells, Section 10. The step-drawdown and constant-rate test shall be used to determine the maximum safe yield for 30 days of continuous use. The 48 hour pump test required by the s ta te shall be performed after the A WWA test. The actual well capacity used to determine the maximum equivalent residential connections shall be the lesser of quantity determined by the AWWA step-drawdown/constant rate test or the 48 hour state requirement test. All well pump tests shall be scheduled with and ob- served by the Utility Director or his designated representative. I 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon adoption. !I t 082 August 11, 1987 - McGraw, AYES: NAYS: On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None 5. Ordinance amendina and reenactinq the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to revise the Floodplain Ordinance: Phillip Henry was present to address this ordinance. Supervisor Johnson inquired if this had been discussed with the Homebuilders Association. Mr. Henry responded that amendment was discussed at the Homebuilders meeting and had been heard under the first reading of ordinance on July 28, 1987. Mr. Hodge responded that Mr. Jamison of the Homebuilders Association called to state he had not had an opportunity to review the ordinance. Supervisor Brittle moved to table this issue until it has been discussed with the Homebuilders Association. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None 6. Ordinance amending and reenacting the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance to adopt the Virginia Department of Transportation Drainage Manual and Road and Bridge Standards and t. 083 August ll, 1987 _.._--_.~-,_..,--~-_.._-~.-_._.,--- _____.._,.._~_._~...___._ .w..~_.,_,.._.__.__._~._"..'_~ .._.." ._.,.._....._.. ~.. _" , . __..."__.~__.~. ,'._.."._____'" ..~_ ... ..... _..~. ~_.,__.._m_..... ,...._.~ ,,-.__,' ""_'0 ~"__"""'.. ,_, _ . ------_._-_._----~----_._--- - - _,~_~__ _... _ ..__.,__..__..__~.~____~_.__._______o·______·.~__".._______" _.. ._"_"~____..,>___..._....,.,,.._... Specifications: This ordinance had been previous discussed on July 28, 1987. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 8ll87-l0 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAINAGE MANUAL AND ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a first reading and public hearing concerning this amendment was held on July 28, 1987; the second reading was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County require the adoption of standards and regulations to minimize adverse environmental impacts resulting ¡!from the dangers of flooding and the drainage of surface and Istorm waters; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-292, 15.1-466, and 15.1-489 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorize the county to I. . adopt ord1nances and to exerC1se such general powers to prevent the pollution of water; to make, erect, and construct drains, ¡sewers, and public ducts; to establish reasonable standards for , 084 August ll, 1987 ~-_._--- drainage regulations of subdivisions or developments; and to pro- vide safety from flood, flood protection, and to protect against the loss of life, health, or property from flood and other simi- lar dangers; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County and its citizens have suffered and continue to suffer the harmful effects of flooding and inade- quate drainage of surface waters, and from the volume and velo- city of storm water runoff; and WHEREAS, these hazards and dangers to public health, safety, and welfare are caused in part by climate, topography and the development of land. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: 1. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin- ance, Section 21-104, "Site plan Review," by revising sub-section C, "Site Plan Preparation," to sub-section (u) to read as fol- lows: (u) P~bl~e storm drainage system, desi ned in accordance with the current edition of the of Transportation Drainaqe Manual. 2. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin- ance, Section 21-104, "Site Plan Review," to add a new sub- section (z) to read as follows: 085 August 11, 1987 ..'~'.'-'-"-'..,-~ -. ---~-"'-"~" ~- ,..~ _.-- .- .·..______n·_· ,_.~ -------_.,.._-~_.._..-.._.._.- ...---------.--- .-..._--~...._..,..~ > - ."0 ·___··....··__..___'A ---'--'-"r' - . .---.--.-- .....----.-------.----.----.-----.----........-.- (z) Compliance with the current edition of the Vir- artment of Trans ortation Road and Brid e Standards and 3. Amend Appendix B, the Roanoke County Subdivision rdinance, Article IV, "Improvements," Section 18, "Plans and pecifications generally," by revising sub-section (d) as fol- * * * * (1) All storm drainage facilities including on-tract off-tract drainage and other drainage structures necessary the proper use and drainage of slopes, streets, highways, and edestrian ways and for the public safety, shall be designed to onvey the flow of surface waters without damage to persons and roperty. The system shall insure drainage away from buildings nd on-site waste disposal sites and septic tank facilities with ubsurface disposal fields. The County of Roanoke will require a rimarily underground system to accommodate frequent floods and a surface system to accommodate larger less frequent Drainage plans shall be consistent with local regional torm drainage plans or be designed in accordance with the cur- ent edition of artment of Trans ortation Drain- e Manual. The facilities shall be designed to prevent the dis- harge of excess runoff onto the adjacent properties. 086 August 11, 1987 ---_.-,_. ------ (2) Erosion and sediment control measures including planting. (3) Compliance with the current edition of the Vir- ginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Standards and Specifications. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 12, 1987. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 7. Ordinance amending Chapter 21 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code, "Zoning" and Appendix A of the 1985 County Code by adding certain provision mandated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and requirement that the Zoning Administrator obtain information regarding elevation and other flood-related factors before issuing a zoning permit: This ordinance was discussed at first reading on July 28, 1987. No citizens were present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 087 August 11, 1987 _·,_o_,_·~w____,_··____~.___ ~~.__._.'.._-,.. --..,-....- '---".'_._,...,-~.._".......,_....,-_.. ._.~... ,,'..". ...... .".,-~.,""" .','..-..".."'.~ --.---------".---. .....' -" ,'. .. ··'__'''.~·.~n_ _.,_..._. __... ....... ._,,_.....,.._ .~._.__,._~ -._._----------~._._- . ... .. ,[ .....-. , ORDINANCE 81187-11 AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE 1971 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "ZONING," AND APPENDIX A OF THE 1985 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY ADDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY TO WIT: DEFINITIONS OF "LOWEST FLOOR," "MANUFACTURED HOME," "MANUFACTURED HOME PARK SUBDIVISION," AND "START OF CONSTRUCTION"; AND REQUIREMENT THAT THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OBTAIN INFORMATION REGARDING ELEVATION AND OTHER FLOOD- RELATED FACTORS BEFORE ISSUING A ZONING PERMIT WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordi- nance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County require the adoption of standards and regulations to minimize adverse environmental impacts resulting from the dangers of flooding and the drainage of surface and storm waters; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-292, 15.1-466, 15.1-486, 15.1- 489, and 15.1-490 of the of Virginia, 1950, as amended authorize the county to adopt ordinances and to exercise such general ¡powers to prevent the pollution of water; to make, erect, and construct drains, sewers, and public ducts; to establish reason- able standards for drainage regulations of subdivisions or devel- opments; and to provide safety from flood, flood protection, and to protect against the loss of life, health, or property from flood and other similar dangers; and 088 August 11, 1987 WHEREAS, Roanoke County and its citizens have suffered and continue to suffer the harmful effects of flooding and inade- quate drainage of surface waters, and from the volume and velo- city of storm water runoff; and WHEREAS, these hazards and dangers to public health, safety, and welfare are caused in part by climate, topography and the development of land. WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has mandated that the County follow the procedures contained within these amendments in order to insure continuation of federal flood insurance for certain residents of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as follows: l. Amend and re-enact Appendix A of the 1985 Roanoke County Code, Zoning Ordinance, Article V, "Special Public Inter- est Regulations", as follows: ARTICLE V. SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST REGULATIONS § 21-61. Floodplains. The purpose of these provisions is to prevent the following hazards: the loss of life and property, the creation of health and safety hazards, the disruption of commerce and governmental services, the extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief, and the impairment of the tax base by the means provided here: 089 August 11, 1987 -_._-,._._--._,>-"._-"~"-"-'-~ , ,_..~,..-.-.,._----~.."...."._. "- - -_."-"~-'" ,'--,- ....-..... . _.- _.. _.~----,., ._- ._-,..~.-. -----------._"._--~._----- , - . ~_._.._----_._.....,---_.-.>_..,-_._._"-----_.._-~.....,---,-->_.~ .h' . __'.'___'."_' _ _._M ~._~__._~__~__'._.. I I(a) Regulating uses, activities, and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities, and development, will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities, and frequencies. (b) Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities, and development from locating within areas subject to flood- ing. (c) Requiring all those uses, activities, and developments that do occur in flood-prone areas to be protected and/or flood-proofed against flooding and flood damage. (d) protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards. Applicability. These provisions shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Roanoke County and identified as being flood-prone as stipu- lated in this section. B. Compliance. (a) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated, constructed, reconstructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compli- ance with the terms and provisions of this section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. (b) This ordinance supersedes any regulations currently in effect in flood-prone areas. However, any underlying regu- lations shall remain in full force and effect to the ex- tent that those provisions are more restrictive. Definitions. or the ur ose of the Flood lain Section of this ordinance, hese terms are defined as follows: (a) Development - any man-made change to improved or unim- proved real estate including but not limited to buildings or other structures, the placement of mobile homes, I 090 .-~.-_._-.--- .---.--.-..,-,------ August ll, 1987 (b) (c) (d) (e) ( f) (g) (h) (i) - streets and other pa ving, utilities, filling, grading, excavation, mining, dredging, or drilling operations. Flood - a general and temporary inundation of normally dry land areas. Floodplain - ( 1 ) a relatively flat or low land area adjoin- ing a river, stream, or watercourse which is subject to partial or complete inundation; ( 2 ) an area subject to the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. Floodway - the designated area of the floodplain required to carry and discharge flood waters of a given magnitude. Lowest floor - the lowest floor includes the lowest en- closed area (includinq basement) of anv structure. An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure usable solely for parkinq of vehicles, buildina access, or storaqe, in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a build- inq's lowest floor, provided that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of this ordi- nance. Manufactured home - a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. The term "manu- factured home" also includes park trailers, travel trail- ers, and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. Manufactured home park or subdivision - a parcel (or con- tiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufac- tured home lots for rent or sale. One Hundred Year Flood - a flood that, on the average, is likely to occur once every 100 years (i.e., that has a one percent chance of occurring each year, although the flood may occur in any year) . Start of construction - "start of construction" includes "substantial improvement" and means the date the buildinq permit was issued, provided the actual start of construc- tion, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improve- ment was within 180 davs of the permit date. The "actual start" means either the first placement of permanent con- 091 August 11, 1987 _______~.... _," '___"___'___~_^e._____·'.'__·__·._.·_·~'_·~_·__'______...,...~.,_.~,._.. .'_...__.__...____'"^..~..._ _..,.._~....._--~-".._, -----r- - - ----------- I ". - - .___...__._ _~__,__.,..~...__..~...._.,_,~.....,___....__~.__'._ "0.,.. .._.,_ ,',,_,".__ _,'___ ·.___v·__·__,__·__._~_,___.____.__. .. -'_.._~._-_."'-'---_._',,-,-~ ,--,-,._._~---.,-_. -~._---------- __.·._M'.~"'_'_'._'._>' struction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construc- tion of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excava- tion; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walk- ways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of tempo- rary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. D. Floodplain area. The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to inundation by waters of the one hundred (100) year flood. The primary basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County prepared by the B.S. Be~a~~æeft~ Of HOttB~"g a"d Brbaft Be~e~o~æe"~,Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, dated ee~obe~ ~~, ~9~aDecember 4, 1985 and subsequent amendments. (a) I (b) I I (c) The Floodway is delineated for purposes of this section using the criteria that a certain area within the flood- plain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one hundred (100) year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one (1) foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 2 of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map accompanying that study. The Flood-Fringe shall be that area of the 100-year flood- plain not included in the Floodway. The basis for the outermost boundary of the Flood-Fringe shall be the one hundred (100) year flood elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and as shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map accompany- ing the study. The Approximated Floodplain shall be that floodplain area for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided, but where a one hundred (100) year floodplain boundary has been approximated. Such areas are shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map and Flood Insurance 092 August 11, 1987 Rate Map. Where the specific 100-year flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data such as the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Floodplain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this ele- vation in accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic engi- neering techniques. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly reflect current- ly accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall be related to existing land use and potential development under existing zoning. Studies, analyses, computations, etc., shall be submitted in suffi- cient detail to allow a thorough review by the County Engi- neer. E. Overlay concept. (a) The Floodplain Areas described above shall be overlays to the existing underlying Zoning Districts as shown on th Official Zoning Map, and as such, the provisions for the floodplain areas shall serve as a supplement to the under- lying Zoning District provisions. (b) Where there happens to be any conflict between the provi sions or requirements of any of the Floodplain Areas an those of any underlying Zoning District, the more restric tive provisions shall apply. (c) In the event any provision concerning a Floodplain Area is declared inapplicable as a result of any legislative 0 administrative actions or judicial discretion, the basi underlying Zoning District provisions shall remain appli cable. F. Flood boundary and floodway map. The boundaries of the Floodplain Areas are established as show on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map and Flood Insurance Rate ~which are declared to be a part of this chapter and whic shall be kept on file in the office of the Zoning Administrator. G. Floodplain boundary changes and interpretation. 093 August 11, 1987 ----_._"_._~..."..----~_..__...- .--,----,----- '" ._,~. ..·.._,_~.·_.M.··___.··.,...__.,____·.~"..."__,· ."._,...___ .,. - '__", .,_._.__.~._"'_~__,~__ _.._ .. 'U' _. "__"""_',._""_ -"----,-----_._- - ----- _...--~.._"..~. ~__ ,__.._.____.,._... _·___._._n_'·"'___"·,"..__..._,__._~_..M_~___.._~~.__.~ . ~.__ _^"'_.._ _.__"_"_. _~ _._____" .Ü~ __.__,_.. a) The delineation of any of the floodplain areas may be revised by the Board of Supervisors where natural or man- made changes have occurred and/or made detailed studies conducted or undertaken by the U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers or other qualified agency, or an individual docu- ments the need for such change. However, prior to any such change, approval must be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administra- tion. b) Initial interpretations of the boundaries of the Flood- plain Areas shall be made by the Zoning Administrator. Should a dispute arise concerning the boundaries of any of the floodplain areas, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall make the necessary determination. The person questioning or contesting the location of the floodplain area boundary shall be given an opportunity to present his case to the Board of Zoning Appeals and to submit technical evidence. Floodplain area provisions. 11 uses, activities, and development occurring within any flood- lain area shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a zoning ermit. Such development shall be undertaken only in strict com- liance with the provisions of this section and with all other pplicable codes and ordinances such as the Virginia Uniform tatewide Building Code and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordi- ance. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the Zoning dministrator shall require all applications to include compli- nce with all applicable state and federal laws. nder no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or develop- ent adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways f any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facil- ty or system. rior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels or loodways of any watercourse, stream, etc., within Roanoke ounty, approval shall be obtained from the State Water Control oard. Further notification of the proposal shall be given to 11 affected adjacent jurisdictions. Copies of such notification hall be forwarded to the State Water Control Board, the State epartment of Intergovernmental Affairs, and the Federal Emer- enc Mana ement A enc , Federal Insurance Administration. a) All Floodplain Districts j 094 August 11, 1987 -----.- -- (1) Required Information For all ermits the Zonin Administrator shall (i) obtain the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new or substan tially improved structures, and whether or not such struc tures contain a basement, (ii) obtain, if the structure has been flood roofed, the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure was flood roofed, and (iii) maintain a record of all such information. Where a non-residential structure is intended to be made water tight below the base flood level, (i) a registered profes sional en ineer or architect shall develo and/or review structural design, specifications, and plans for the con struction, and shall certif that the desi n and methods of construction are in accordance with acce ted standards of ractice for meetin the a licable rovisions of the Vir inia Uniform Statewide Buildin Code, and (ii) a record of such certificates which includes the s ecific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structures are flood- roofed shall be maintained b the Zoning Administrator. (2) Zone A The Zoning Administrator shall obtain, review and reason abl utilize an base flood elevation and floodwa data available from a Federal, State, or other source, as cri teria for re uirin that new construction, substantial im rovements or other develo ment in Zone A meets all standards noted in the Floodplain section of this ordi nance. (3) Service Facilities (4) Manufactured Homes 095 August 11, 1987 --_._-----_..~-- ~-_._,,--------- ....w_.·,....._.~._··.___" .... "-"-'."-'-'-"'~---".-._-'---- . .'. _ _. __ .___._ ~..w___~ .-, '-'-'-"-"'--~--"~'" "._--..-.--.-~..._----- .' .~.~.--~_._.-~-. ..~-~-'-~------'-'.----".'.--""-.~-.-.-.'.-.-...-,----- .--'-""^._._._.~--'-"'-.",-_....-.._.__......_.""'--' - tion and shall be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system in accordance with the provi- sions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. This provision shall apply to existing manufactured home parks, subdivisions and lots where an existing manufac- tured home is replaced, any expansion to an existing park or subdivision, and to new parks, subdivisions and instal- lations constructed after the effective date of this ordi- nance. (5) Area Below Lowest Floor For all new construction and substantial im~rovements, fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: a minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings may be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. ( b) Floodway In the Floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such development on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements which have been approved by all appropriate authorities as required above. The placement of any meb~%emanufactured home, except in an existing meb~%emanufactured home park or subdivi- sion, within the Floodway is specifically prohibited. (1) Permitted Uses In the Floodway the following uses and activities are permitted provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying Zoning District and are not prohibited by any other ordinance and provided that they do not require structures, fill, or storage of materials and equipment: 096 August ll, 1987 ----.---.-----.. "(i) Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. (ii) Public and private recreational uses and activities such as parks, day camps, picnic grounds, golf courses, boat launching and swimming areas, hiking, and horseback riding trails, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, trap and skeet game ranges, and hunting and fishing areas. (iii) Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas. (iv) Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as yard areas, parking and loading areas, airport land- ing strips, etc. (2) Uses Permitted by Special Exception The following uses and activities may be permitted by Special Exception of the governing body following a public hearing provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying Zoning District and are not prohibited by this or any other ordinance: (i) Structures (except for mobile manufactured homes) accessory to the uses and activities in (1) above. (ii) Certain utilities and public facilities and improve- ments such as pipe lines, water and sewage treatment plants, and other similar or related uses. (iii) Water-related uses and activities such as marinas, docks, wharves, piers, etc. (iv) Extraction of sand, gravel, and other materials (where no increase in level of flooding or velocity is caused thereby). (v) Storage of materials and equipment provided that they are not flammable or explosive, and are not subject to major damage by flooding, or provided that such material and equipment is firmly anchored to prevent flotation or movement, and/or can be read ily removed from the area within the time available after flood warning. 097 August 11, 1987 ---~._--_.~~~_.__.._,~-'--,_. --_. --_.~._.... --"--~-'---*' -"-'--"'--.-'- .----.--.-..-------- -- __,,___··~_o ..+._._--._- ...__._---_._---_._...__.~.~"---_..'"--_._.,~-. .. .~_...~.."'._ _,.__.._.,._._"__. ....._.. 0'- (vi) Other similar uses and activities provided they cause no increase in flood heights and/or velocities. All uses, activities, and structural development, shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the flood-proofing provisions contained in all appli- cable codes and ordinances. c) Flood-Fringe and Approximated Floodplain In the Flood-Fringe and Approximated Floodplain the devel- opment and/or use of land shall be permitted in accordance with the regulations of the underlying Zoning District provided that all such uses, activities, and/or develop- ment shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the floodproofing and related provisions contained in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and all other applicable codes and ordinances. However, in Approximated Floodplain areas the applicant and/or developer shall evaluate the effects of the pro- posed development and/or use of land on the floodplain with current hydrologic and hydraulic engineering tech- niques. The applicant and/or developer shall submit studies, analysis, computations, etc. to show the delinea- tion of a floodway based on the requirement that all exist- ing and future development not increase the 100- year flood elevation more than one (1) foot at any point. The engineering principle, equal reduction of conveyance, shall be used to make the determination of increased flood height. Procedures for Special Exception in Floodways. a) Any use listed as permitted with a Special Exception in a floodway shall be allowed only after application to the County Board of Supervisors. Such application shall include the following: (1) Plans in triplicate drawn to scale not less than 1" to 100' horizontally showing the location, dimensions, and contours (at 5 foot intervals) of the lot, existing and proposed structures, fill, storage areas, water supply, sanitary facilities, and relationship of the floodway to the proposal. r 098 August 11, 1987 ~'_~·'m__'··_._"_'''_ (2) A typical valley cross-section as necessary to adequately show the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and 100-year flood elevation. (3) A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream. (4) A summary report, prepared by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, evaluating the pro- posed project in relation to flood heights and velocities; the seriousness of flood damage to the use; and other per- tinent technical matters. (5) A list of names and addresses of adjoining property owners. (b) The Board shall refer the complete application including technical evaluation to the Planning Commission. The Plan- ning Commission shall conduct such investigations as it deems necessary and shall conduct a public hearing under Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. (c) In acting upon such applications, the Planning Commission and the County Board of Supervisors shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this chapter and: (1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. No special exception shall be granted for any proposed use, develop- ment, or activity within the Floodway that will cause any increase in flood levels during the one hundred (100) year flood. (2) The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury of others. (3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamina- tion, and unsanitary conditions. (4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its con- tents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners. 099 August 11, 1987 - . -.". -"----.-- ,_..~_._. _ . ,^_ ,,_. '_"0-__- ",._.' __ ._.......____........._ ''''''.'___.m..__ __ __.._ ___".._."__~..^__,,. ',,_ ~ "_^_'"_''A'_~__''' '. ,._._~"~.._._._...,_.".....,- ----- .~_.., __ .~_....._________.___.__,.__________._~_.__.__._..,"~_"._,...~_..,_.. __..~_.,.__., __.'M· ._."'.__'" (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the County. (6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront loca- tion. (7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. (8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing devel- opment and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. (9) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and floodplain management program for the County. (10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. (11) Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of this section. d) The Board shall conduct a public hearing after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission and render a decision. Variances. ariances may be granted for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, r restoration of structures listed on the National Register of istoric Places or a state Inventory of Historic Places without egard to the procedures set forth in this section. ariances may not be considered within any Floodway if any in- rease in flood levels during the 100-year flood would result. ariances may be considered for new construction and substantial mprovements to be erected on a lot contiguous to and surrounded y lots with existing structures constructed below the lOO-year lood level using the guidelines set forth in Part I (c) of this ection above. he Board of Zoning Appeals may refer any application and accompa- ying documentation pertaining to any request for a variance to ny engineer or other qualified person or agency for technical ssistance in evaluating the proposed project in relation to ~lOO August 11, 1987 flood heights and velocities, and the adequacy of the plans for protection and other related matters. Variances shall only be issued after the Board of Zoning Appeals has determined that the granting of such will not result in (a) unacceptable or prohibited increases in flood heights, (b) addi- tional threats to public safety, (c) extraordinary public expense, (d) creation of nuisances (e) fraud or victimization of the public, or (f> conflict with local laws or ordinances. Variances shall only be issued after the Board of Zoning Appeals has determined that the variance will be the minimum relief to any hardship. The Board of Zoning Appeals shall notify the applicant for a vari- ance, in writing, that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the one hundred (100) year flood elevation (a) increases the risks to life and property, and (b) will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance. A record of the above notification as well as all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, shall be maintained and any variances which are issued shall be noted in the annual report submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration. K. Existing structures in floodplain areas. A structure or use of a structure or premises which lawfully existed before the enactment of these provisions, but which is not in conformity with these provisions may be continued subject to the following conditions: (1) Existing structures and/or uses located in the floodway shall not be expanded or enlarged (unless the effect of the proposed expansion or enlargement on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements). (2) Any modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a structure and/or use located in any floodplain to an extent or amount of less than fifty (50) percent of its market value, shall be evaluated and/or floodproofed in accordance with the Virginia Uni- form Statewide Building Code. (3) The modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a structure and/or use regard- 101 August 11, 1987 ________O>.M._ --"'-. .-.-,>.- ".." _ >_..,.. .,_......_.~....___._.,,,.,_,._ "_·'~·_.M·'~_.___,.__~._.+.__.____. '._.___.___.._.____,~......,_._A' -~----._.._------- - , ._.._--_._..'-_._._~_.._--_._,,------~,---_._-,~'"'_."--..,~.,,_.._.,----,.._.._...~~..~_. ~~. .- -",,-,,_. -... less of its location in a floodplain district to an extent or amount of fifty (50) percent or more of its market value shall be undertaken only in full compliance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Liability. he degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this ection is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is ased on acceptable engineering methods of study. Larger floods ay occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by an-made or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings estricted by debris. This section does not imply that areas utside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such reas, will be free from flooding or flood damages. his ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke ounty or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages hat result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative ecision lawfully made thereunder. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be 12, 1987. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor ickens, and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson YS: None RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel: Supervisor Brittle nominated ichard Robers to another two-year term. Mr. Robers' term will pire September 27, 1989. RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS t:} 02 August 11, 1987 M___" ,._ _,_ --,----- - Supervisor McGraw announced he had submitted a report on his activities at the National Association of Counties conference. Chairman Johnson directed that a copy of the report be included in the agenda packet. Supervisor Johnson commended Director of Utilities Clifford Craig for the pamphlet on the North Lakes Interconnection Project. Supervisor Johnson also advised he has received phone calls concerning the "cruising" on Williamson Road. Since part of Williamson Road is in Roanoke City and a portion in the County, he asked board concurrence for County Attorney Paul Mahoney to discuss with Sheriff Foster, and for Roanoke City and the county to proceed on a solution to this problem together. Supervisor Brittle suggested that the Department of Parks and ecreation and Social Services also become involved, because the roblems go beyond that of law enforcement. CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. he motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the ollowing recorded vote: ,·103 August 11, 1987 ""-,__'_",__,,,,,,,,»_,,___,,__,,,_,,,,..._._.___,,.,_..,.. .e_,·_, .."" _~ ... ._._____~ ._,,_......__.._....__..,.._.,.....___... ___.... "W~_·..·__^·_ _..,.__._~._-~_.._.~. ! .__._.,_._,.~,-_.'"--,_._-_._._._--_.._._.- ---r-- I I ._____.___.._____________.__.___^__,,___.~_~_.._.__'..~.._ ··____·~__,_·_.·__·+___...~_._.u .. RESOLUTION NO. 81187-12 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the ard of Supervisors for August 11, 1987, designated as Item L - nsent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to ch item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 rough 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - July 14, 1987 2. Confirmation of Appointment to the Community Corrections Resources Board 3. Acceptance of a donation of a 25' x 20' lot to construct a booster pump station. 4. Approval of a Resolution of Support to bring the World Cup Soccer Matches to the United States 5. Request for increase in Youth Haven II Petty Cash Account. 6. Request for Acceptance into the Secondary System of the following roads: a. Huntridge Road, Springer Road, Britaney Road, Setter Road b. 0.03 miles of Burnham Road c. Summerset Drive, Summerset Circle and Branderwood Drive. d. 0.12 miles of Fernway Drive e. 0.06 miles of Sutherland Circle 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed and a d directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said 104 August 11, 1987 - ~--------- items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None RESOLUTION 81l87-12.c OF SUPPORT TO BRING THE 1994 WORLD CUP SOCCER GAMES TO THE UNITED STATES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Soccer is one of the world's most popular sports, and is the fastest growing team sport in the United ta tes; and WHEREAS, The United states Soccer Federation is an rganization supporting and promoting soccer at all levels; and WHEREAS, Soccer provides an excellent opportunity for ur youth to develop team and individual athletic skills; and WHEREAS, the 1994 World Cup will be a major sporting nd tourism event; and WHEREAS, World-wide interest in the 1994 World Cup will ocus world attention and interest in our nation, and would reatly encourage the continued growth of soccer in the United ta tes . 105 August 11, 1987 ---..-.,------- ___..____..__M_._.".______."._ __. ..·0._..··.__..._ _.__.___.__~_,~_ _,.~ "'. _.___.._.____".__~'u______._.M___... _"_m_.___~.,,_ .._....__.___ .,,_~_.,._.,"_"~" . - ---.'-----.-----,.--.------ -"'--"---'--'-'-'--- -.""-,-..--- ._~_. __x __'_ .___________ ,_~_._._."__~_____.__~__.__ ___.__e"",u____.. M__'_._'___'_"_· "'. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of upervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia declares its full support f the efforts of the United States Soccer Federation in bringing he 1994 World Cup to the United States, and offers it nthusiastic support to the United States Soccer Federation in 11 its actions before the Federation Internationale de Football ssociation, with the goal of bringing the 1994 World Cup to our and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of oanoke County that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The irginia General Assembly and the Virginia Association of ounties requesting their support for this effort. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor arrett, and upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None RESOLUTION 8ll87-l2.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SUTHERLAND CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the roceedings herein, and upon the application of Sutherland Circle 106 August 11, 1987 h_ _ ...__ to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Campbell Hills, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on November 18, 1980 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Sutherland Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 8ll87-l2.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BURNHAM ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM 4- 107 August 11, 1987 ------ ~,- .._-~..__. -- -_.. ~ - "..,~._'. ,-_. ,-,_._~,~-_._.. _ ~.e..·,_·,.._" ·~"'_."_...~..n."" ._. .------ . ...._.._--~-_._---_._.'--~-,-,~._-~_.._-_._._--_..,._.--.----.-.--"-----.....-....-...-----.,- .,.~,,---._.__.._-"-...,_.,-- . _.' ---'........,-,,_.__... BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the roceedings herein, and upon the application of Burnham Road to e accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore eed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as stle Rock West, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Page 319, of the records of the Clerk's Office of Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 15, 1985 d that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from he abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby arantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Burnham Road and which is shown a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the me is hereby established as public road to become a part of the ate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from d after notification of official acceptance of said street or "ghway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 108 August 11, 1987 --- .---.---. . ~- ._-,,--'._-----,- -------- On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 8ll87-l2.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HUNTRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGER ROAD, BRITANEY ROAD AND SETTER ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road, Springer Road, Britaney Road and Setter Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in plat Book 9, Page 200, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 17, 1981 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 109 August 11, 1987 ·___,__·.__._·_T.___._.._.··____.__~"_.._._.. _~__·~_·__'_n.·_·_._..__·.._.__.<_,,_..~._·,. ___,..__.",,__ - "_.'~ ------~.,.--_.__._--_.,._-----_.- ......-..-.-----..-.-., 3. That said road known as Huntridge Road, Springer Road, ritaney Road and Setter Road and which is shown on a certain ketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby stablished as public road to become a part of the State econdary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and fter notification of official acceptance of said street or ighway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor arrett, and upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None RESOLUTION 8ll87-l2.h REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FERNWAY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the roceedings herein, and upon the application of Fernway Drive to e accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State ighways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore eed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as arriage Hills, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in 110 August 11, 1987 ___.___.,·_·__.__._,·.___.__._______w______" "_._------._- plat Book 10, Page 1, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 6, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby uarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Fernway Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the state Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor arrett, and upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None RESOLUTION 8ll87-l2.g REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SUMMERSET CIRCLE AND BRANDERWOOD DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the roceedings herein, and upon the application of Summerset Drive, ummerset Circle and Branderwood Drive to be accepted and made a ,,~., 1 11 August 11, 1987 _., ,,_ _...__ - ._.~.'__.~~... _...__., ._n_ ~""""'---'--'" .~. "~.".. '.. _.. _·"·_,____________"·_·A_·"H~_.~~__~_,~,_·___._____. ..' -. _.,.,-----~-.__.._.~ "--'--'-'-._',--".'," ." art of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 3.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore eed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as randerwood, Sections 1, 2 and 3 Subdivision which map was ecorded in Plat Books 9 and 10, Pages 351, 5 and 19, of the ecords of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke unty, Virginia, on December 4, 1985, May 7, 1986 and July 31, 986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report rom a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way rom the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby arantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Summerset Drive, Summerset and Branderwood Drive and which is shown on a certain etch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby stablished as public road to become a part of the State econdary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and fter notification of official acceptance of said street or 'ghway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor rrett, and upon the following recorded vote: ES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson YS: None r 112 August 11, 1987 . - ...".- - ----~... -.--.--.--- IN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of June 30, 1987. 2. Youth Haven II Status Report. 3. Report on 911 Public Awareness Campaign. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 3:50 Supervisor Brittle moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (1) personnel, and (4) location of a perspective business or industry. he motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson None IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to pen Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and arried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None 113 August 11, 1987 ____,._,_.0_..", _',__._ _, _,", '''__.._~ w.·_·___.~",_ __. ~'_.'_'. '··__··_""'~"____'_"'._.'A'___'~ ... .___.'¥..__._"^___...._..._.__..._".. __ _._._._~,~.__..."_ _._------~~----,---_._~.._-^'-_..._--~._--,-,',.. ,_.'-'-'.__._-_.._.~ -. . -'-'--'--""'-.." .'---"---' N RE: ADJOURNMENT At 5:01 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting.