HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/1/1985 - Regular
,
'1
, .'")
;fJ.:
"1;·
I
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
October 1, 1985
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1985.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 4:10 p.m.
I
The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Steven A. McGraw; Supervisors
Harry C. Nickens and Alan H. Brittle
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Vice-Chairman Athena E. Burton (arrived at
4:19 p.m.) and Supervisor Gary J. Minter
(arrived at 4:16 p.m.)
IN RE:
MEETING WITH CONSULTANTS AND STAFF FROM THE CITY OF
ROANOKE TO DISCUSS PROPOSED AIRPORT EXPANSION
Acting County Administrator, Paul Mahoney, reported
that he and the Roanoke County staff had met with Bob Herbert and
Kit Kaiser concerning the airport expansion earlier this morning.
I
Mr. Bob Herbert, Acting Roanoke City Manager, reported
that the purpose of this meeting is to discuss the airport master
plan. Several alternatives have been developed for City Council
to determine in the master plan. The Airport Advisory Commission
has already endorsed one of these concepts. Roanoke City has
¡---
~
r
190
October 1, 1985
also endorsed one concept but feel that it should receive review
and comment by the other governing jurisdictions. Montgomery
Mr. Jack Smith, Chairman of the Airport Commission,
I
County has also endorsed one concept.
reported that a new terminal is needed because it is the first
and last sight seen by many visitors to the area. This terminal
is also needed to bring bigger airlines into the area.
Mr. Kit Kaiser, Director of utilities and Operations of
Roanoke City, reported that 1968 is the base year for the data
used for the current master plan. The master plan contains three
elements: 1) forecast and projections of needs; 2) placement
of facilities; and 3) projection and financial data.
Concept B was approved by the Roanoke City Council,
Airport Advisory Commission and Montgomery County.
Mr. Ed Beale, a member of the design team for Delta
I
Associates in Richmond, virginia, who developed the master plan,
presented the three concepts to the Board of Supervisors.
Concept K - This concepts provides for a two story
addition to the existing terminal and the addition of two gates.
Concept C - Concept C provides the addition of a new
terminal to the old terminal and the addition of four gates. The
old building would be used for commuter airlines. This concepts
calls for a linear plan instead of a pier plan.
Concept CI - This concept moves the old terminal to the
existing parking lot and provides for the addition of seven gates
General Aviation would be housed in the old terminal. This plan
allows the use of the old terminal and building around it. This
Concept B - The new terminal would be built near the
I
also provides for a pier concept instead of a linear.
fire station existing at the airport and provides for the
addition of seven gates.
~
~
,
October 1, 1985
l~ {~
a~
I
Mr. Herbert reported that expansion is needed because
there is a need for a 25 percent increase in space at the
terminal.
I
Supervisor Burton felt that expansion of the terminal
was not needed since the majority of future air service in
Roanoke will be commuter service.
Mr. Beale, of Delta Associates, responded to
Supervisor Burton that Piedmont's flights to Roanoke have
increased. More space is needed at the terminal to attract more
airlines into Roanoke. Mr. Beale felt that bigger airlines
cannot be attracted until terminal facilities are large enough to
accommodate them.
Mr. Herbert reported that expansion will not guarantee
larger air carriers but that the Valley needs to go ahead with
the expansion to compete with other localities. He also felt
that if air carriers do not come into the Valley, it will be hard
to attract corporations to relocate in the Valley.
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor Burton moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-334 (a) (1). The motion
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Burton moved to return to Open Session at
7:00 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
I
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Minter requested that Item I of the Consent
Agenda be removed for separate vote.
Supervisor Minter moved to approve Item 1 concerning
the Hollins Community Development Corporation and Farmers Home
Administration.
~
~
r
I 192.
October I, 1985
Resolution Number 85-169
On notion made by Supervisor Minter, the General Appropriation Resolution
I
of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 11, 1985 be, and is the same hereby
amended as follows to becane effective as of the date of the adoption of this
resolution.
DESCRIPTION
ACCOONT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DEŒFASE)
Class:
Fund:
Object:
Class:
Fund:
Object:
Revenues
Hollins Carmmity Deve10pnent
Area
Camnuni ty Developnent Block
Grant
Farmers' Hane Loan
Farmers' Hane Grant
Virginia - water Projects
Grant
Revenue Sharing - Roanoke
County
Revenue Sharing - Botetourt
County
Virginia Deparbment of
Highways Grant
Local Contribution
$ 700,000
395,700
948,000
90,000
46,132
42,500 I
81,368
87,850
Expenditures
Hollins Carmmity Deve10pnent
Area
Administration
Housing Rehabilitation
Streets
Parks
water and Sewer
60,434
483,836
309,479
96,480
1,441,321
Preliminary appropriation to establish fund for Hollins Camnmity Developnent
Area. Local contributions are charges for fees that will not be charged or for
allocation of costs that have been previously budgeted in other departIœnts.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and upon the following recorded vo e:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
I
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve Items 2, 3, and 4,
of the Consent Agenda.
RESOLUTION 85-170 CANCELING AND
RESCHEDULING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS'
MEETINGS TO BE HELD IN NOVEMBER AND
DECEMBER, 1985
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
~
October 1, 1985
19~
1. That the regular meetings of the Board of
Supervisors scheduled for November 5 and December 24, 1985, be,
I
and hereby are, canceled; and
2. That the regular meeting of the Board of
Supervisors scheduled for November 12, 1985 be, and hereby is,
canceled and rescheduled for November 13, 1985 at the Roanoke
County Administration Center; and
3. That the regular meetings of the Board of
Supervisors for the months of November and December, 1985, be,
and hereby are, scheduled for November 13, November 26, December
3, and December 10, 1985 at the Roanoke County Administration
Center; and
4. That a duly attested copy of this resolution shall
be published in the newspaper having general circulation in
Roanoke County on October 15 and October 22, 1985; and further
I
posted on the front door of the Roanoke County Courthouse and the
Roanoke County Administration Center.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION NO. 85-171 ACCEPTING A BID TO
PAINT THE EXTERIOR OF EIGHT WATER TANKS
LOCATED AT VARIOUS SITES WITHIN THE
COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
I. That that certain bid of B & B Paint Contractors,
Incorporated in the amount of $50,000.00 to paint the exterior of
I
eight water tanks located at various sites within the County,
upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and same
hereby is, ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of
----
r
iL 94
October 1, 1985
"
Roanoke County, all to be upon form approved by the County
Attorney; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby
I
rejected and the Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and
express the County's appreciation for the submission of their
bids.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
RESOLurION 85-172 AMENDING RESOLurION 00. 85-89 ESTABLISHING
A CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN FOR THE 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.
That Resolution No. 85-89 be amended as follows:
Grade 17
I
Code
Title
Dept.
No. Emp.
-
821
Deputy Sheriff
Sheriff/Policing
& Investigation
36 35
Grade 18
Code
Title
Dept.
No. Emp.
-
823
Detective
Sheriff/Policing
& Investigation 8 9
I
2. That this amendment shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
~
October 1, 1985
1 C:, .. ".~
~þ (.j
IN RE:
WORK SESSIONS
I
1. Report on SPCA Request for Increase of Fees - Held
over to October 22, 1985
2. Oral Discussion on Reimbursement to Town of vinton
for Curbside Trash Collection - County Attorney, Paul Mahoney,
reported that the amount in the resolution and the appropriation
resolution will decrease as trash collection becomes more
regular.
Supervisor Nickens requested that Mr. Mahoney make a
correction in paragraph 2 from 1/2 to 1/3.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared
resolutions with the recommended change in paragraph 2.
RESOLUTION 85-173 AUTHORIZING
REIMBURSEMENT TO THE TOWN OF VINTON FOR
THE COSTS OF CURBSIDE COLLECTION SERVICE
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That there is hereby appropriated to the Town of
vinton a sum of money not to exceed $94,000; said reimbursement
to be a grant to the Town of vinton for the costs of curbside
trash collection for residential households in said town; and
2. That one-third of this sum shall be payable in
December of 1985 and that the balance of this sum shall be
payable in June of 1986; and
3. That it is recognized by the Board and the Town
Council that this sum of money is an estimate based upon the best
information available to the parties at this time. This sum of
I
money shall be adjusted as a result of actual audited data and
information, the adjustment for each year to be accomplished in
the following December's payment; and
4. That this reimbursement grant shall be based on
actual costs attributable to curbside trash collection service
based upon actual number of residential households served. At
i---
~
r
196
October I, 1985
the County's option, County shall have the opportunity to adjust
this reimbursement grant to an amount equal to the County's
estimated cost to provide such service in the Town of vinton; and
5. That this reimbursement grant shall be subject to
I
fiscal appropriations by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
Resolution Number 85-174
On notion made by Supervisor Nickens, the General Appropriation Resolution
of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 11, 1985 be, and is the same hereby
amended as follows to becane effective as of the date of the adoption of this
resolution.
rn:::RFASE
DFSCRIPI'ION ACCOONT NUMBER (DEx::RFASE) I
Class: Expenditures
Fund: General
Dept. : Miscellaneous
Object: Refuse Credit - Town of vinton 03-6-09105-0-58010 $ 94,000
Dept. : Unappropriated Balance 03-6-99999-0-99999 (94,000)
To reimburse vinton for refuse collection expenses being paid fran real estate
taxes.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Nickens, Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: None
Supervisor Burton reported that she felt that the
curbside trash collection would prove to be a much better service
and that the costs will be considerably lower. She also reported
that she has received some citizen requests that trash collection
I
remain as it was since they live in areas where it is difficult
to take trash to the curb. Mr. Hubbard is currently working up
cost information that will reflect additional costs for back door
pick up for those areas. She requested that staff bring a cost
-
~
~
October 1, 1985
I l.J ./
. t.,l (~
comparison of back door service and curbside service to the Board
for their review.
I
Mr. Hubbard reported that 90 to 95 percent of the
citizens are taking their trash to the curb. If citizens desire
to change to backdoor service, they should fill out an
application.
Supervisor Minter presented a memo from Elizabeth
Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court, requesting funds to cover a
ceremony to unveil the Judges' portraits at the new Courthouse.
The Board directed that the liaison to the Circuit Court Clerk
contact her and request that she examine her budget for these
funds.
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
I
Supervisor Minter moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-334 (a) (1) (2) (4) and (6).
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Nickens moved to return to Open Session.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
I
-Av C(-/1u-r~
Chairman
~