Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/1984 - Regular ~ 32~ I Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24015 December 18, 1984 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December, 1984. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Vice-Chairman Burton called the meeting to order at I 3:10 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairman Athena E. Burton, Supervisors Gary J. Minter, Steven A. McGraw, Alan H. Brittle MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION Supervisor McGraw moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a), (1), (2), (4), and (6). The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Chairman Harry C. Nickens arrived during Executive Session. I IN RE: OPEN SESSION Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session at 4:00 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Work Session - Fire Hydrant Policy - John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, and Tom Fuqua, Coordinator of Fire and Emergency Services presented a report to the Board of ----- ~ ~ ~}~9 t,-' ~. December 18, 1984 Supervisors regarding the placement of fire hydrants. For insurance purposes, all fire hydrants must be within 1,000 feet of all structures in residential areas and greater distances than I 600 feet require relay pumping by the Fire Department. Mr. Fuqua and Mr. Hubbard suggested an incentive program for the installation of fire hydrants. They suggested having funds from their budget or capital improvement fund set aside each year to enable the County to participate in a 50/50 share program with communities to place fire hydrants. Mr. Hubbard and Mr. Fuqua also suggested a policy on new development whereas developers will be required to furnish the needed water flow and provide the right size main. Supervisor Burton requested the staff to report back to the Board on including this suggestion into the fire ordinance. Supervisor Minter suggested color coding buildings that contain hazardous materials. Mr. Fuqua reported that any I organization or individual storing such materials are required to have a permit. The Board concurred with all recommendations of the staff. Staff is to start evaluations. County Administrator, Donald R. Flanders, reported that he would like to have a work session on January 8, 1985, to discuss using Capital funds to allocate funds for fire hydrants and color coding. Work Session - Carvin Creek Flood Control Program - John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, reported on this program. The Army Corps of Engineers reported that this area would qualify for a study under their program. A letter or resolution is required to get a Recon study started. The study will be done at no cost. Supervisor Minter moved to request a regarding this study. Supervisor Nickens asked if Roanoke County I Recon report as soon as possible and to have a resolution spread should hire their own engineering firm to parallel the Army Corps of Engineers' study. Mr. Hubbard felt that this would not be necessary. ----- L .., 330 December 18, 1984 Report on Progress of Reassessment Project and Need to Extend Completion Date - John Chambliss, Superintendent of Fiscal I Management, updated the Board on the 1985 Reassessment Program. The County Assessor and staff have completed the review of all property in Roanoke County for the property values and have made the first assignment of values to properties. There are, however, a few commercial properties and close up items that are still being reviewed for accuracy and being loaded into the computer system. The appraisal staff is currently reviewing the new construction during the last six months of 1984. Mr. Chambliss requested an extension for up to ninety (90) days. He anticipates that all field work, including building permits, will be completed by January 15, 1985, and notices will be sent to property owners approximately January 31, 1985. The month of I February has been set aside for informal hearings. The Board of Equalization will convene their hearings for formal appeals in mid-March and citizens will have until June 30, 1985, to resolve any disputes in values of property. Supervisor McGraw moved for approval of the prepared resolution. RESOLUTION 84-219 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PETITION THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE DUE DATE OF THE COMPLETION OF THE 1984 REASSESSMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to petition the Circuit Court of Roanoke County for an extension of time for completing the reassessment for a period of I three months from December 31, 1984 until March 31, 1985 pursuant to Section 58-792 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, Minter, and Nickens. NAYS: None. ~ ~ ,...- 331 December 18, 1984 IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Burton - No Report. I Supervisor Brittle - Presented a request from the Clearbrook PTA for a Bingo/Raffle permit. Mr. Brittle moved that the request for the permit be accepted and the $25 fee be returned to the Clearbrook PTA. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Brittle also presented a prepared resolution relating to the advancement of the hiring date of the Bailiff's position for the new Courthouse from February 1, 1985 to January 1, 1985. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the prepared resolution. RESOLUTION 84-220 AMENDING RESOLUTION 84-101 APPROVING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE 1984-85 FISCAL YEAR I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 84-101 approving the classification plan for the 1984-85 fiscal year be amended to read and provide as follows: Grade 17 Code - Title Dept. No. Emp. 820 Court Bailiff Sheriff/Policing & Investigation 10 9 Grade 19 - Code Title Dept. No. Emp. - 824 Deputy Sheriff Sergeant Sheriff/Policing & Investigation 10 ~:I: 2. That this amendment shall take effect January 1, I 1985. On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None - ~ 1- .., December 18, 1984 332 Supervisor Brittle also reported that Roanoke County has been identified by the Department of Energy as a possible site to locate nuclear dumps and moved that a resolution be I prepared and placed in the minutes of the January 8, 1985 Board of Supervisors meeting to be forwarded to the Department of Energy opposing the placement of that dump. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Brittle asked Mr. Hubbard about leaf collection throughout the County. Mr. Hubbard reported that leaves will be collected through the first or second week of January, 1985. Supervisor McGraw - No Report. Supervisor Minter - No Report. Supervisor Nickens - No Report. I IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA County Administrator, Donald R. Flanders, requested that the resolution concerning Item 25 on the Consent Agenda be changed to read "or his designee" on item 1 on first line. Chairman Nickens requested a work session on Item 10 on the Consent Agenda, Audit for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1984. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the Consent Agenda with the above listed changes. RESOLUTION NO. 84-223 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM F - CONSENT AGENDA I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December 18, 1984, designated as Item F - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as ~ ~ ,...- 00'3'. M ~ ~ ~ December 18, 1984 to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 25, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - September 11, 1984. I 2. Memorandum from George E. Calvert, Jr., State Administrator, Industrial Bond Program dated November 26, 1984 concerning year-end close-out of industrial development bonds. 3. Letter from Oscar K. Mabry, Department of Highways and Transportation dated November 20, 1984 pertaining to Secondary System Additions to Roanoke County. 4. Letter dated November 26, 1984 from J. T. Shropshire, Compensation Board to Sheriff o. S. Foster acknowledging receipt of Order of Dismissal for 1984/85 Statutory Appeal. 5. Letter dated December 3, 1984 from Jack Smith, Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce thanking Roanoke County for their assistance on Sandlot Super Bowl #1. 6. Approval of Change Order No. 4 for the Vinton Branch Library. - Resolution. 7. Report on revenues from surplus auction. I 8. Letter dated December 5, 1984 from John V. Jackson, Department of Conservation & Economic Development concerning funding for the Clean Valley Committee. Highway road submittal to 9. Highway road submittal to Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation of Canter Drive and Cromwell Court in the Canterbury subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. - Order. 10. Transmittal of audit for fiscal year ending June 30, 1984. 11. Accounts paid for November 1984. 12. Financial statements for November 1984. 13. Bid Reports for the following: a. Paving of Bent Mountain Refuse Center. b. Radio equipment for the fire department. c. furnishing for Mt. Pleasant library. - Resolution. I 14. Memorandum dated November 28, 1984 from Jill M. Pope, Virginia Association of Counties concerning legislative meetings and public hearings on Antitrust. 15. Raffle Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose, No. 284. Fee is paid. - ~ ~ December 18, 1984 334 16. Audit Report for the Clerk of Circuit Court from 1/1/82 to 6/30/82 and years ending June 30, 1983 and 1984. I 17. 18. 19. 20. Approval of payment for easements in Big Hill water line. - Resolution. Status report on closing of Knowles Road to through truck traffic. .. Status report on Hollins Park Grant. Letter dated November 9, 1984 froITl Senator Paul Trible regarding water resource problem in the Roanoke River Basin. 21. Letter dated December 5, 1984 from Becky Shaffer, Virginia Skyline Girl Scout Council regarding the flag raising at the Roanoke County Administration Center. 22. Letter dated December 5, 1984 from Fred Altizer, Jr., Department of Highways and Transportation concerning traffic problems on View Avenue and culverts at Carvin Creek. I 23. Letter dated November 29, 1984 from State Senator Dudley J. Emick, Jr. pertaining to the Joint Legislative meeting on December 13, 1984. 24. Report on cost-sharing agreement for the reconstruction of Lantern Drive - Resolution. 25. Authorization for acquisition of 206.09 acres owned by J. Armstrong Cross, et al., for $600,000 - Resolution. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None I RESOLUTION 84-223.A APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO THE COUNTY'S CONTRACT WITH Q. M. TOMLINSON, INCORPORATED FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE VINTON BRANCH LIBRARY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: ----- ~ "...- Q3~ .J ~ ~) December 18, 1984 1. That Change Order No.4 to the County's contract with Q. M. Tomlinson, Incorporated for reconstruction of the vinton Branch Library be, and hereby is, approved as set out below: I 1. 2. 3. 4. Repair and re-insulate damaged water pipes Furnish and install faucet in workroom sink Furnish and install faucet in men's toilet Unstop and repair clogged roof drains 2. That the County Administrator is ADD $611.75 ADD 105.25 ADD 112.50 ADD 330.50 TOTAL $1160.00 hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No. 4 on behalf of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-223.B ACCEPTING CERTAIN BIDS MADE TO ROANOKE COUNTY SET FORTH AS FOLLOWS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That those certain bids set forth as follows in the following words and figures be, and hereby are, accepted, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, to-wit: A. Surface treating of the parking lot and entrance road at the Bent Mountain Refuse Site - awarded to Roanoke Valley Paving, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $2,625.08. B. Various radio equipment for use by various fire departments - awarded to Motorola C & E, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $17,675.00. C. Purchase contract for oak wood shelving delivered and installed at the Mount Pleasant Public Library - awarded to J. H. Pence Company for an amount not to exceed $5,792.00. I 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of Roanoke County upon a form approved by the County Attorney; and - ~ December 18, 1984 336 l I I I 3. That all other bids are hereby rejected and the Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the I County's appreciation for the submission of their bids. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None. RESOLUTION 84-223.C AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN WATER LINE AND ACCESS ROAD EASEMENTS FOR THE BIG HILL WATER LINE PROJECT WHEREAS, it is the intention of Roanoke County to acquire certain real estate and easements in connection with the construction of a water supply system including a water tank, booster station, water lines, and access easements in that portion of the County known as "Big Hill"; and I WHEREAS, this acquisition is part of the County response to a serious environmental problem involving Matthews Electroplating and a portion of this solution is being funded by means of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency's "Super Fund" program; and WHEREAS, the County staff has successfully negotiated a fair and reasonable price for the acquisition of easements for the construction of said water lines and for an access road. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County authorizes the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such steps necessary in order to acquire certain water line and access road easements from the following individuals and for the amounts indicated: I John Willis Bryant, Sr. and Gladys R. Bryant - $2,500.00 John Willis Bryant, Jr. and Frances Rider Bryant - $1,289.00. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None ----- ~ ~ 337 December 18, 1984 RESOLUTION 84-223.D AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COST-SHARING AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO LANTERN DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute an agreement with Fralin & Waldron for the reconstruction of Lantern Drive from Lamplighter Drive to Twilight Drive; the purpose of this agreement is to complete certain road improvements for submittal to and acceptance by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation as part of the state's secondary road system; and 2. That the total cost of this project shall be $13,006; 70% of which cost shall be paid by the County and 30% of which cost shall be paid by Fralin & Waldron. The County's share shall be $9,104.20; and 3. This agreement shall be upon a form to be approved I by the County Attorney; and 4. That money is available in Road Approvement Account #16-6-60181-00000. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None. RESOLUTION 84-223.E AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 206.09 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator or his designee is I authorized to execute such documents necessary to acquire ownership of approximately 206.09 acres of real estate owned by J. Armstrong Cross, et al., for a purchase price of $600,000; and 2. That excepted from this property is a 75 foot strip on the southwestern boundary of this property; however, the - ~ ~ 338 December 18, 1984 County shall acquire easement rights for purposes of access and utilities across and along said 75 foot strip; and I 3. That the purchase price shall be paid as follows: 50% shall be paid at closing which shall occur on or before December 31, 1984, and the remaining 50% shall be paid on January 2, 1985; and 4. That the General Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 12, 1984, be, and same hereby is, amended as follows to become effective December 18, 1984: DESCRIPTION Class: Fund: Object: I Fund: Object: Class: Fund: Object: ACCOUNT NUMBER INCREASE (DECREASE) Expenditure Capital Property Acquisitiion 16-6-60177-00000 $600,000 General Transfer to Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 03-6-09316-90016 $600,000 ($600,000) 03-6-99999-99999 Revenues Capital Transfer from General Fund 16-5-51030-000000 $600,000 On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote with the addition "or his designee" to paragraph 1: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION I Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a), (1), (2), (4), and (6). The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: OPEN SESSION Supervisor McGraw moved to return to Open Session at 5:35 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. f---- ~ ".- 339 December 18, 1984 IN RE: RECESS Chairman Nickens called for a dinner recess at 5:40 I p.m. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Harry C. Nickens; Vice-Chairman Athena E. Burton; Supervisors Alan H. Brittle Steven A. McGraw, and Gary J. Minter MEMBERS ABSENT: None IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Chairman Harry C. Nickens. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS, AND COMMITTEES I 1. Industrial Development Authority - Mr. Robert Glenn was present to answer any of the questions the Board may have about requests for approval of Industrial Development bonds. Ten of the eleven requests were made by George Preas for a office development on Starkey Road. This project is to be closed by the end of the year with the approval of the Board. The eleventh request is made by Mr. Gallagher, whose property has been rezoned. Mr. Gallagher's request provides for final approval by the County Administrator since his public hearing will not be held until Friday before the Industrial Development Authority. Supervisor Minter moved for approval of each of the prepared resolutions. I RESOLUTION 84-237 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF STEPHEN MUSSELWHITE WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the ----- ~ ~ December 18, 1984 ~40 application of Stephen Musselwhite (the "Company"), 2706 Ogden Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the I Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $395,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and I WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. ~ ~ ~ ~41 December 18, 1984 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 I a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None I RESOLUTION 84-238 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF WILLIAM P. SWANN WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of William P. Swann (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $143,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from the Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in I Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and ---- over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of ~ ~ 34,2 December 18, 1984 I industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident I thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the ~ommonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged ~hereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon ~ts adoption. Dn motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: ~ ~ ~ 343 December 18, 1984 AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-239 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF SHERRILL W. STOCKTON I WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of Sherrill W. Stockton (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $260,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of I public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of I Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. ----- ~ ~ 344 0, ..,hør lR. lQOA County, Virginia, as follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I I I 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident I thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: ~YES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-240 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROBERT S. KIDDER WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the ~ounty of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the I pplication of Robert S. Kidder (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey oad, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the uthority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount stimated at $135,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of he Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an (ffice facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey J oad across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood ----- ~ ~ ::\ 4 ~) r.. ,- lQ lQQ,4 Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. I I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide I that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and ----- ~ ~ December 18, 1984 346 neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged I thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-241 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF W. H. FRAZIER, III WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of W. H. Fraizer (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the I Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $150,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance I of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and ----- ~ "..- 34'i1 December 18, 1984 WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, I and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement tc a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 I of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens RESOLUTION 84-242 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF GEORGE R. PREAS I NAYS: None WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the ---- application of George R. Preas (the "Developer") P. O. Box 4338, ~ ~ 348 December 18, 1984 Roanoke, Virginia 24015, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount I estimated at $150,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and I WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: I 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to I I ~ I J "..- 349 December 18, 1984 a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide I that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-243 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF CHRIS G. SCORDAS AND ROBERT V. KINNEY I WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of Chris G. Scordas and Robert V. Kinney, as partners, 4502 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $255,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and I WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of ----- ~ .., December 18, 1984 350 industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and I WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident I thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: I-- ~ ~ ~-~ ~) 1 ... December 18, 1984 AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-244 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF MICHAEL A. ABBOTT, JOSEPH BLACKSTOCK, WALTER A. GOLD, MILES J. NEWMAN, G. BRUCE NUSSBAUM, AND RONALD L. BLUM I WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of Michael A. Abbott, Joseph Blackstock, Walter A. Gold, Miles J. Newman, G. Bruce Nussbaum, and Ronald L. Blum, as partners, (the "Company"), 1940 Braeburn Drive, Salem, Virginia 24153, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $300,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project") Square Shopping Center in Tanglewood Professional Center in I on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County I of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving ----- the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, ~ ~ 352 December 18, 1984 and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to I pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None RESOLUTION 84-245 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOMAS C. SCORDAS I WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the application of Thomas C. Scordas (the "Company"), 3420 Electric Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24018, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $135,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an ~ ~ r i '".1 53 t) t. December 18, 1984 office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a I public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of I the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of I Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the Board. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as I required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to ----- ~ ~ December 18, 1984 354 I pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens NAYS: None 2. Department of Public Facilities - John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, requested that Item a, the report on Cherokee Hills Water Supply be removed from the agenda until further notice. Supervisor McGraw asked Mr. Hubbard and his staff to contact the people involved with this project more I often. Mr. Hubbard requested that the Board approve the order concerning Lantern Drive to be submitted to the Highway Department. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the order of Lantern Drive. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Hubbard also reported to the Board that the lighting is now complete at the Mt. Pleasant Park Development and the entire project should be completed by spring. 3. Department of Development - Timothy Gubala, Superintendent of Development, presented a report on the Industrial Development Bond Allocations. Mr. Gubala reported that all industrial development projects must be closed by December 31, 1984, or the funds provided will be returned to the I State allocation. 6. County Attorney - Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the prepared resolution concerning the legal aspects of the Finance Board recommendation for Bank Services. RESOLUTION 84-221 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PROPOSAL FOR BANK SERVICES FOR ROANOKE COUNTY I--- ~ "..- n~5 ~.~ ~) . December 18, 1984 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain proposal of Dominion Bankshares I in the amount of $1,460.90 for bank services for Roanoke County, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and same hereby is, ACCEPTED; and 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of ! Roanoke County, all to be upon form approved by the County Attorney; and 3. That all other proposals for this service are I hereby rejected and the Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's appreciation for the submission I of their proposals. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None 7. County Administrator - Mr. Flanders requested that the Board accept the donation of 40 acres of land from Mr. Darnell Vineyard. The land is currently located in Roanoke City and Mr. Vineyard has requested that the land be developed as a park if at all possible. Supervisor Brittle moved to accept the donation of this land and to have the County Attorney draft the necessary documents for the transfer. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the resolution I accepting the donation of water and sewer lines installed at the development of winterset South, Section 1, and authorizing Roanoke County to authenticate such acceptance. I--- RESOLUTION 84-222 ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ~ ~ 356 December 18, 1984 I INSTALLED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF WINTERSET SOUTH, SECTION 1, AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO DULY AUTHENTICATE SUCH ACCEPTANCE AS MADE AND PROVIDED BY LAW BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the offer of F & B Developer, Inc., developers of winter set South, Section 1, to donate the water and sewer lines installed with the development of winterset South, Section 1, in Roanoke County to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That upon receipt of a duly executed deed upon a form approved by the County Attorney, from F & B Developer, Inc. conveying the hereinabove mentioned water and sewer lines to the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator is hereby authorized to authenticate the acceptance thereof, as made and I provided by Section 15.1-286 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None. Mr. Flanders advise the Board the he will appoint Timothy Gubala, Superintendent of Department of Development, to be acting County Administrator while Mr. Flanders is on vacation from December 20 through December 31, 1984. This appointment was approved unanimously. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS I Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the following prepared resolution expressing appreciation to Dorothy Butler for her service to Roanoke County. RESOLUTION 84-224 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO DOROTHY BUTLER FOR FORTY YEARS SERVICE TO THE COUNTY ----- ~ r ~~7 December 18, 1984 WHEREAS, Dorothy Butler was first employed by the County of Roanoke in August, 1944, in the office of Treasurer A. M Bowman, Jr. and whereas during her period of service she did serve as Chief Deputy Treasurer from 1969 until the present; and I WHEREAS, Dorothy Butler has been a good and faithful employee in the Treasurer's Office of Roanoke County having served with five of Roanoke County's ten Treasurers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its heartfelt appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Dorothy Butler for her loyal and dedicated service of forty years in the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an attested copy of this I resolution duly authenticated be forthwith presented to Dorothy Butler. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, Minter, and Nickens. NAYS: None Chairman Nickens presented the approved resolution to Dorothy Butler and also presented her with a certificate of appreciation and a $100 series EE United States Savings Bond. Chairman Nickens presented a resolution to Rescue Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. and Fire Fighter Samuel D. Robinson. Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the prepared RESOLUTION 84-225 COMMENDING FIRE FIGHTER SAMUEL D. ROBINSON OF ROANOKE COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND RESCUE SQUAD #5 I resolutions. WHEREAS, on November 21, 1983, at approximately 5:30 p.m. the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Department and Rescue Squad #5 responded to an emergency at the Carvins Cove Recreation ----- . l .~ December 18, 1984 3 5 8 area involving a boating accident and possible drowning. It was a cold, dark evening and neither the boat nor the victims could I be immediately located. Despite visibility problems, a rescue boat was immediately launched with Fire Fighter Samuel D. Robinson and Rescue Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. aboard; however, the outboard motor malfunctioned. In order to save valuable time Mr. Robinson and Mr. Lindsey proceeded to row the boat by hand to the location of the capsized boat where they rescued two live victims from the water. These victims were treated at the scene for hypothermia and transported to the hospital. WHEREAS, this accident was unfortunate and the loss of one life tragic but the two survivors were fortunate. Fire Fighter Robinson and Squadsman Lindsey responded as quickly as possible to this emergency, located the victims quickly and I rescued them from the water. Their actions exemplify the dedication and professionalism of the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Fighters and Rescue Squadsmen. WHEREAS, Samuel D. Robinson has been a member of the Roanoke County Fire Department #5 since 1976 and has been very active in the operation of the department, serving on the training committee which is responsible for the planning of all fire fighter training. He currently resides at Bent Creek Apartments with his wife and two children and is employed by Viking Jet-Away. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors commends Samuel D. Robinson for his heroic and I special efforts in this rescue operation and hereby awards Samuel D. Robinson with the Medal of Valor. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: None ----- I~ r 359 December 18, 1984 RESOLUTION 84-226 COMMENDING RESCUE SQUADSMAN DAVID G. LINDSEY, JR., OF ROANOKE COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND RESCUE SQUAD #5 WHEREAS, on November 21, 1983, at approximately 5:30 I p.m. the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Department and Rescue Squad #5 responded to an emergency at the Carvins Cove Recreation area involving a boating accident and possible drowning. It was a cold, dark evening and neither the boat nor the victims could be immediately located. Despite visibility problems, a rescue boat was immediately launched with Fire Fighter Samuel D. Robinson and Rescue Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. aboard; however, the outboard motor malfunctioned. In order to save valuable time Mr. Robinson and Mr. Lindsey proceeded to row the boat by hand to the location of the capsized boat where they rescued two live victims from the water. These victims were treated at the scene for hypothermia and transported to the I hospital. WHEREAS, this accident was unfortunate and the loss of one life tragic but the two survivors were fortunate. Fire Fighter Robinson and Squadsman Lindsey responded as quickly as possible to this emergency, located the victims quickly and rescued them from the water. Their actions exemplify the dedication and professionalism of the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Fighters and Rescue Squadsmen. WHEREAS, David G. Lindsey, Jr. has been a member of the Roanoke County Rescue Squad #5 since 1982 and has been very active in the operation of the department and has pursued training to the Shock Trauma Technician Level of the Advanced I Life Support Program. He currently resides on Fairway Forest Drive in Salem, Virginia, and is employed by Roanoke Ready Mix. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors commends David G. Lindsey, Jr. for his heroic and special efforts in this rescue operation and hereby awards David G. Lindsey, Jr. with the Medal of Valor. ----- l ~ December 18, 1984 360 On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. I NAYS: None. Chairman Nickens presented the resolutions to David G. Lindsey and Samuel D. Robinson. Chairman Nickens also presented a Roanoke County Medal of Valor to each rescuer. Mr. Robinson'sand Mr. Lindsey's names will be placed on the Medal of Valor plaque to be placed at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Chairman Nickens presented a resolution thanking Mrs. Mabel Smith for her service on the Roanoke County Planning Commission. Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the prepared resolution. I RESOLUTION 84-227 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO MRS. MABEL SMITH FOR NINE YEARS SERVICE ON THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, Mabel Smith was appointed to serve as the Windsor Hills Magisterial District representative to the Roanoke County Planning Commission in 1975 to fill an unexpired term; she was reappointed again in 1976 and 1980, serving a total of nine years with perfect attendance; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Smith has served on committees for the improvement of the appearance of Roanoke County through the establishment of the junk car ordinance, sign ordinance, and satellite dish ordinance; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Smith has also served on many civic commissions and was instrumental in the acquisition and location I of the new Southwest County Postal Office; and WHEREAS, Mabel Smith was instrumental in reasserting the planning movement in Roanoke County during her era on the Planning Commission and was adamant in her request for increased staff committment to the planning and zoning function. ----- ~ r361 December 18, 1984 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the Board does hereby on behalf of its members and former Board members who served and I worked with Mabel Smith and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County express to Mabel Smith its heartfelt appreciation for her dedication and efforts expended in addressing the needs and solving the problems of the citizens of Roanoke County over the many years she devoted to Roanoke County government; and FURTHER that an attested copy duly authenticated be forthwith presented to Mrs. Mabel Smith. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None. Chairman Nickens presented the resolution to Mrs. Mabel Smith. Chairman Nickens presented a resolution congratulating I Roanoke County 4-H club members for winning national and state 4-H competitions. RESOLUTION 84-228 CONGRATULATING 4-H MEMBERS, ROBIN SILVER AND JULIE BOLT FOR BEING SELECTED STATE AND NATIONAL WINNERS IN 4-H COMPETITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That congratulations be extended to Roanoke County 4-H members, Robin Silver for being selected first place winner in State 4-H Achievement and first alternate to a $1,000 scholarship in national competition, also to Julie Bolt for being selected first place in State 4-H Fashion Revue competition and I third alternate to a $1,000 scholarship in national competition; and 2. That the Roanoke County 4-H program be acknowledged for providing training and leadership opportunities for growth ----- ~ ~ 362 December 18, 1984 and development of Roanoke County youth as exhibited by Robin Silver and Julie Bolt. I On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None Chairman Nickens presented the resolution to Lowell Gobble, VPI & SU Extension Agent. Chairman Nickens and Mr. Flanders presented Julie Bolt and Robin Silvers with Roanoke County pins and certificates of appreciation. IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS I Mr. G. L. McFarland spoke on the Albert Farm property (Diuguids Lane). He reported that the neighborhood wants to support the Board and has appointed Scott and Anita Large as contacts. I Ms. Elizabeth Patterson spoke on behalf of the Big Hill area citizens requesting a Community Center and a park within their area. The citizens feel that the Community Center should be first since it can be used all year. Chairman Nickens reported to Ms. Patterson that this area will be considered in the park study. Mr. James Smith, President, Catawba Valley Ruritan Club, spoke regarding the use of the Catawba School as a Community Center. Mr. Smith requested a resolution to finalize the decision on the Community Center and to receive some sort of response from the Board of Supervisors. Harold Wingate also spoke before the Board on behalf of the Catawba citizens. Mr. Wingate reported that he had made efforts to meet with the architect at the Catawba School but was not successful. Mr. Wingate reported that he had two roofing contractors appraise the roof and both feel that the roof does not need to be replaced. Mr. Wingate reported that a retired - ~ r 3 {~~ 3 , '\..,.,. December 18, 1984 electrical contractor within the community that has expressed a willingness to help out as much as he can. Supervisor McGraw reported that he had received an estimate from the architect to I renovate the building as should be done in excess of $40,000. Supervisor Brittle suggested that the matter be referred to staff to look into selling the property to the Catawba Community. Chairman Nickens suggested that Mr. Wingate, Mr. Smith, and others from the community meet with two members of the Board with a representative from the School Board, and the architect who performed the evaluation and come back to the Board at the second meeting in January, January 22, 1985. Supervisor Minter suggested a matching arrangement wherein the County would match the funds donated by the citizens. Supervisor Brittle volunteered to serve on the committee but requested that they come before the Board at the February 12, 1985, meeting. Mr. Leo B. Trenor, 543 Petty Avenue, NE, Roanoke, I Virginia, spoke to the Board concerning the sale of alcoholic beverages. Mr. Trenor requested that the Board and other members of committees to go to the legislators and request a law to be passed requiring all persons selling alcoholic beverages (convenience stores and bars) to have an individual license. Chairman Nickens requested Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, to check into the legal ramifications of requiring these licenses. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Nickens announced that Marshall Harris, Petitioner, requested that the public hearing Item K-l, the Petition of Marshall Harris requesting rezoning from R-l to I R-5 of a tract containing 10 acres located east of Old Manor Drive and adjacent to the south boundary of the Mountain View Elementary School and located in the Hollins Magisterial District, on the agenda be postponed to a later date. - ~ ~ 364 December 18, 1984 I Petition of Larson Oaks Associates requesting rezoning from Residential R-l to Residential R-6 of a tract containing 18.3 acres located off Larson Lane, SW, bordered on the north by Adamson Road and located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. APPROVED Sam Lionberger, builder/developer of the property, was present to answer any questions of the Board. Mr. Roy Jarrett, owner of the property, was also present as were Mr. Gordon Late, syndicator and developer, and Buford Lumsden, engineer. Mr. Lionberger reported that there would be seven or eight lots developed with townhomes and the access would be off Adamson Road. The other sixteen lots would have a primary entrance and exit off Tamaranne Drive and Larson Lane. Traffic impact is estimated at I II I I I 470 vehicular trips per day. Mr. Ray Robrecht was present representing the opposition to this development. Mr. Robrecht and his clients feel that these townhomes should not be developed between two subdivisions and feel that it would be disruptive in the community. The citizens opposing this development have been told by the developer that the land could be and would develop the land as single family. The citizens are willing to accept this but oppose the townhomes. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, legally described below, be rezoned from Residential R-l District to Residential R-6 District. I BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Tomaranne Drive, said point being located S. 430 45' E. 10.0 feet and S. 360 10' 10" E. 41.66 feet from the southwesterly corner of Lot 30, Block 2, Section 1, Melody Acres (Plat Book 4, page 55); thence with the easterly side of Tomaranne Drive along the arc of a circle to the left whose radius is 157.89 feet and whose chord is N. 360 10' 10" W. 41.66 feet an arc distance of 41.78 feet to a point; thence N. 430 45' W. 10 feet to a point; thence N. 380 07' E. 141.42 feet to a point; thence N. 430 45' W. 712.90 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence N. 840 46' E. 242.54 feet to a point marked by an old iron, thence N. 720 46' E. 335.0 ----- ~ ~ I I or~)' .~ iP ~. December 18, 1984 feet to a point in the center of Greenview Road; thence S. 410 OS' E. 428.91 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 390 37' E. 653.36 feet to a point; thence S. 770 02' 30" E. 396.0 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 620 36' 30" E. 99.0 feet to a point on the boundary of Oak Grove Development Corporation; thence S. 30 la' 30" W. 362.26 feet to a point; thence N. 760 29' W. 480.0 feet to a point; thence N. 780 17' W. 340.0 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 870 51' W. 110.93 feet to a point; being the Southeast corner of Tract "B" on the Plat hereinafter referred to; thence with the easterly boundary of Tract "B" N. 50 18' 25" W. 139.53 feet to a point, being the southeast corner of Tract "A" on said Plat; thence with the easterly boundary of Tract "a" N. 50 18' 25" W. 334.69 feet to a point; thence S. 380 07' W. 171.34 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and containing 18.30 acres, and being designated as Tract "CD on the Plat of the Survey made for Herman F. Larson Estate by T. P. Parker and Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated December 1, 1974. I BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote: I AYES: Supervisors Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Burton and Minter Petition of Gaby Karim for a Special Use Permit to operate a landfill on a 45-acre tract, located on the southside of State Route 1404 approximately 0.8 miles from State Route 311 in the Catawba Magisterial District DENIED Mr. Gaby Karim was present before the Board to answer any questions. Mr. Karim reported that the land was used for dumping earlier and that he intended to use the area to dump rocks, concrete slabs, and brush but that all dumped materials would be covered. Sheldon Rosenbloom, Route 2, Box 294, Roanoke, I Virginia, 24019, was present to oppose the petition. Mr. Sheldon asked that Mr. J. F. Tobey, Jr., Route 2, Box 293B, Roanoke, Virginia, 24019, speak for him. Mr. Tobey opposes this petition because there was no definitive plan, no completion date, the landfill is not needed, the effect of property value, ----- ~ , 366 December 18, 1984 interference with the natural topography and drainage patterns, the inability of the road to support heavy trucks or an increase I in traffic, air and water pollution potential, and the location of the landfill as it is adjacent to the roadway which leads to an increase of and attraction for illegal dumping. Mr. Sheldon Rosenbloom reported on the traffic conditions that will be created by this landfill. Mr. Rosenbloom reported that there are no sidewalks along the roads and there any many children who walk on that road. Mr. Rosenbloom also reported that parts of the road are only 13 feet wide and creates no room for traffic to pass especially for a school bus. Mr. Newson E. Via, Jr., Route 2, Box 294-G, Roanoke, Virginia, 24019, reported on the problems the neighborhood has had regarding dumping. Raymond J. Hickman, 2729 Montvale Road, SW, Roanoke, I Virginia, was also present in opposition of the petition. Mr. Gerald Hollamon, 1993 Boulevard, Salem, Virginia, Pastor of the Valley World Ministries Church, was present in opposition representing the membership of that Church which has purchased 20 acres of land along Loch Haven Road. Mr. Karim reported that he is not trying to change the creek bed. He also reported that he did clean up the area after the County instructed him to do so and posted the area. Supervisor McGraw moved to deny the request of the petitioner. Mrs. Burton reported to Mr. Karim that if this petition is granted it would not be in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and would not be compatible with the I surrounding area. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Supervisor McGraw directed staff to have area cleaned up since it could possibly be a health hazard. Petition of Paul E. Durham for a Special Exception Permit to place a mobile home on a 1.75 acre tract located on the south side of Route 688 approximately 600 feet from the intersection of State Route 688 and ---- ~ ~ 367 December 18, 1984 613 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 8, 1985 I Mr. Durham was present to answer any questions of the Board. Mr. Durham reported that the land was given to them by their mother-in-law and his mother-in-law needs them near her for help since she has recently been sick. Mr. Durham has already looked into dozing the land. Mr. Durham reported that the mobile home will be placed 500 to 600 feet away from the road. Mr. Cecil Meador, adjacent property owner to Mr. Durham's land, was present in opposition of this rezoning request. Supervisor Burton requested a sketch of the profile of the slope involved in the grading. Supervisor Brittle moved to table this public hearing to January 8, 1985. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. I Petition of Barry L. and Brenda J. Ward requesting rezoning from Residential Estates of two tracts of land containing a total of 2.102 acres and located at 426 Crestland Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. Planning Commission recommends approval. APPROVED Maryellen F. Goodlatte of Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby was present on behalf of Barry and Brenda Ward. They are requesting rezoning to maintain horses and construction of a barn Charles Osterhoudt, the immediate next door neighbor of the Wards, was present in support of the rezoning request. Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the rezoning I request. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from R-l to RE, subject to the conditions proffered by the Petitioners f---- and attached to this Order. ~ ~ December 18, 1984 36~ All that certain tract or parcel of land located in Roanoke County, Virginia situated on the northern line of I Crestland Drive and more particularly described in accordance with a plat of survey by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Salem, Virginia, dated June 27, 1978, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the northern line of Crestland Drive corner with the property of Barry L. Ward hence South 840 OS' 24" W., a distance of 80 feet to an iron pin. Hence a new line extending North 090 54' 28" W., a distance of 379.04 feet to a point marked by an iron pin set in the center line of Carvins Creek thence North 840 36' E., a distance of 7.50 feet to a point, thence North 880 25' E., a distance of 55 feet to a point corner with Barry L. Ward property. Thence South 120 38' E., a distance of 376.50 feet to the point and place of beginning. Being the same property conveyed to Barry L. Ward and Brenda J. Ward, husband and wife by deed dated July 24, 1978, from Dorothy L. Cocke, widow, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1104, page 528. I BEGINNING at an iron stake on the north side of Crestland Drive (40 feet wide), a corner of the property of John W. Neikirk; thence leaving Crestland Drive and running with said Neikirk, N. 120 38' W., passing an iron pipe on line at 351.10 feet, in all a total distance of 376.50 feet to a point in Carvins Creek in the line of Section No.1, Sunnybrook; thence with same and up said Carvins Creek, N. 880 25' E. 50.96 feet to a point; thence N. 800 IS' E. 50.60 feet to a point; thence S. 880 16' E. 74.72 feet to a point; thence leaving Carvins Creek and with a new division line through the property of Matilda K. Peck, S. 120 38' E., passing an iron stake on line at 71.77 feet, in all a total distance of 371.71 feet to an iron stake on the north side of Crestland Drive; thence with same S. 880 121 W. 78.60 feet to an iron stake; thence S. 840 OS' W 96.40 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 1.486 Acres; and Being the same property conveyed to Barry L. Ward and Brenda Joyce Ward, husband and wife, by deed dated January 19, 1976 from Matilda K. Peck and Homer S. Peck, husband and wife, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1036, page 420. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is I directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County, and that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County, and that a copy of this order be transmitted to Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby, attorneys for the Petitioners. ----- ~ r I 36~ December 18, 1984 The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of Supervisor Minter and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and I Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: None PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the zoning request hereinabove set forth: 1. The barn to be constructed on the subject property shall be located behind the dwelling house. 2. The proposed fence to be erected on the subject property shall be placed north of an imaginary line connecting the rear corner of the residence on the subject property with the rear corner of the adjoining residence of Charles and Beverly I Osterhoudt. 3. No more than three horses shall be maintained on the subject property. Petition of Olympia Motor Inns, Inc. requesting rezoning from R-l, Residential to B-2 Business District, of a tract containing 2.066 acres located at 7887 Carvins Street the Hollins Magisterial District APPROVED Jennings T. Bird of Bird, Kinder & Huffman, was present on behalf of Olympia Motor Inns, Inc. Olympia Motor Inns, Inc. is requesting rezoning to construct and operate a motel with a Charles Osterhoudt of Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, I restaurant. Aheron & Agee, representing citizens opposing this request. The citizens oppose this rezoning because of the screening and buffering condition imposed. They feel that although trees will be planted along the boundary, there will be no way for them to ---- ~ , 370 December 18, 1984 block light and noise as they will not be grown trees. The citizens feel that the residential district will eventually be I done away with in this area. Supervisor Minter moved to deny the request of the petitioner. The motion failed by a 4-1 vote as follows: AYES: Supervisor Minter NAYS: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the request of the petitioner. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from R-l to B-2. I BEING all that parcel situate in Roanoke County, Virginia, consisting of Lots 10-12 Section 1, Walrond Court, identified in the Roanoke County Property Identification Maps as Parcels 27.06-4-5, 27.06-4-6 and 27.06-4-7 and being further known as 7887 Carvins Street, NW. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: None. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The Petitioner, Olympia Motor Inns, Inc., hereby I voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the zoning request hereinabove set forth: 1. There shall be no street entrances from the property onto Carvins Street except as required by State or local governmental ordinances and codes. ----- ~ ".. ~3ì71 December 18, 1984 2. There shall be no more than five (5) building entrances or doors facing adjoining property that is zoned for single-family residential use except as required by State or local governmental ordinances and codes or as reasonably required to provide access for installation or maintenance of equipment, fixtures and similar items. 3. There will be no windows from motel rooms or rental units facing adjoining property that is zoned for single-family residential use. 4. A landscaped buffer zone will be established and maintained around the perimeter of the property in accordance with all applicable requirements of Roanoke County Ordinances, including but not limited to Draft 7, Screening and Buffering Provisions, Zoning Text Amendment. 5. Development of a motel and restaurant on the property will be in general accord with the Preliminary Site Plan prepared by Richard H. Gregory and Associates and filed with the rezoning Petition. 6. The number of motel rooms or units will not exceed one hundred one (101). 7. The property will not be used for the following purposes which are otherwise allowed in the B-2, Business District: I I (a) Home appliance sales and services; (b) Coin-operated laundries and coin-operated dry-cleaning establishments; (c) New car dealerships with related facilities; (d) Public billiard parlors and poolrooms, bowling alleys, dance halls, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement. 8. The foregoing conditions shall remain in full force and effect for as long as any of the adjoining property on the west side of Carvins Street (the easterly 250 feet of Lot 3 and I - ~ ,., 879 low December 18, 1984 all of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Section 2, Walrond Court) and the adjoining property to the north (Lot 13, Section 1, Walrond I Court) are zoned for single-family residential use. Petition of W. H. Fralin and K. W. Lester for rezoning from Residential District R-3 and Business District B-2 to Manufacturing District M-l, property containing approximately 7.6 acres and located near the intersection of u. S. Route 220 and Valley Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. APPROVED Mr. Fralin was present to answer any questions the Board may have. There were no citizens present in opposition to the rezoning. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the rezoning petition. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned I tract of land, more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A, be rezoned from B-2 and R-3 to M-l, subject to the following restrictions and conditions: 1. The site plan presented will be substantially complied with at the time of building and developing of the land. 2. No signs will be placed on top of building(s) next to Valley Avenue. 3. In the event the sale of the property is not consummated to Mr. Gallagher, or his assigns, the property zoning will revert to its existing zoning. 4. In addition to the proposed landscaping presented, all County Code requirements for landscaping will be met. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is I directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: None. - ~ r I I 3'7 3 December 18, 1984 EXHIBIT A Description of property of Heywood Fralin and Karen Lester located on Valley Avenue, just west of U. S. Route 220, Roanoke County, Virginia, containing 7.60 acres, more or less: BEGINNING at a point on the north side of Valley Avenue, being the southwesterly corner of the property owned by Heywood Fralin and Karen Lester, said point being on the line of the property of Dorothy V. and Elonza L. Nye; thence leaving Valley Avenue and following a line between the Fralin, et al property and the Nye property, N. 150 35' 35" W. 654.03 feet to a point; thence continuing with said property, S. 820 51' W. 91.34 feet to a point; thence continuing with said property, N. 80 50' W. 396.0 feet to a point, corner to the property of Mary C. Jordan Heirs; thence with the property of the Jordan Heirs, N. 790 47' E. 271.53 feet to a point; thence with a new line through the Fralin, et al property, S. 150 50' E. 132.05 feet to a point; thence N. 810 00' E. 69.94 feet to a point corner to the property of American Motor Inn, Inc.; thence S. 180 00' E. 60.90 feet to a point; thence N. 800 45' E. 44.0 feet to a point; thence leaving the American Motor Inn, Inc. property and following the line of Allen Moran Property, S. 50 00' E. 60.0 feet to a point; thence N. 800 50' E. 49.50 feet to a point; thence S. 50 00' E. 64.0 feet to a point, corner to the property of Kenneth E. Lucas; thence with the Lucas property, S. 810 00' W. 48.25 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Lucas property, S. 60 04' E. 79.29 feet to a point, corner to the Moran property; thence S. 110 34' 20" E. 127.64 feet to a point; thence with new lines through the Fralin, et al property, S. 770 48' W. 51.86 feet to a point; thence S. 200 55' E. 427.5 feet, more or less, to a point on the north side of Valley Avenue; thence with the same, S. 390 52' 55" W. 37.5 feet, more or less, to a point on same; thence with a curve to the right, whose chord is S. 500 10' 30" W. 203.60 feet to a point; thence continuing with Valley Avenue, S. 650 57' 30" W. 44.67 feet to a point; thence S. 240 02' 30" E. 10 feet to a point; thence continuing with Valley Avenue, S. 630 52' 30" W. 125.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and containing 7.60 acres, more or less, and being as shown on map platted from records for Heywood Fralin, dated April 9, 1982. I I Public Hearing on Ordinance amending Section 19-8 of the Roanoke County Code "Exemption of Real Property Tax on Property of Certain Elderly or Disabled Persons" by increasing certain income and net worth dollar limits. APPROVED Mr. Mahoney, County Attorney, reported that the approval of this ordinance would increase the dollar amounts in the existing County ordinance concerning the tax relief for the I elderly. Specifically this would increase from $15,000 to $18,000 on the combined income provision and increase the combined net worth provision from $55,000 to $65,000. ~ ~ ., 374 December 18, 1984 Mr. F. G. Stephenson, 5608 Merriman Road, Chairman of the Advisory Council of the League of Older Americans spoke in favor of the increase of these limits. I Mr. Bruce Bloodworth, 120 Trinkle Avenue, NE, Roanoke, Virginia, Secretary of the League of Older Americans was also present in favor of the increase. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the prepared ordinance. ORDINANCE 84-232 AMENDING SECTION 19.8 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE "EXEMPTION OF REAL PROPERTY TAX ON PROPERTY OF CERTAIN ELDERLY OR DISABLED PERSONS" BY INCREASING CERTAIN INCOME AND NET WORTH DOLLAR LIMITS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: I 1. That Section 19.8 of the Roanoke County be amended to read and provide as follows: Section 19.8. Exemption of real property tax on property of certain elderly and disabled persons. (a) * * * * The person or persons seeking an exemption shall file an application for exemption in affidavit form with the Commissioner of the Revenue all annually before April 1 to be exempt for the current year. Such application shall set forth the combined income of the owners and their relatives living in the dwelling on such property for the preceding calendar year. To be eligible for the exemption the owners and their relatives living in the dwelling shall not have a combined income which exceeds, from all sources $:1:5,999 $18,000 per annum provided however, that the the first $4,000 of income of each relative, other than the spouse of the owner or owners, who is living in the dwelling shall not be included in such total. In addition the owners and the spouse of any owner shall not have a total combined net worth, including all equitable interests, which exceeds $55,999 $65,000 as of December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year. The amount of net worth specified herein shall not include the value of the sole dwelling house and up to one acre of land. * * * * This amendment to take effect on December 18, 1984.. I On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None Public Hearing on adoption of a resolution pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended setting forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter upon certain property and take possession of and ownership of real estate in connection - -~ "..----- ~7 5 December 18, 1984 with the construction of a water supply system and reservoir. John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, I presented a map to the Board of Supervisors showing present property owners. They are: Reynolds, Knapp, and Link - joint owners; Obenchain; Wohlford; and Young. Mr. Glenn Knapp, 135 Elwood Street, Hollins, Virginia, spoke against Roanoke County's purchase of this property. Chairman Nickens assured Mr. Knapp that it was not the intent of the County to proceed into condemnation proceedings but must consider the long range needs of the citizens. Mr. Nickens also informed Mr. Knapp that this property is the best located for a regional raw water supply impoundment. Mr. Harry Young, 370 Fort Lewis Boulevard, Salem, Virginia, also spoke against the purchase of this land. He is concerned about the purchase price. Mr. Young feels that they I should receive an amount large enough to purchase another 10 acres like his present property. Ms. Juanita Obenchain, also spoke concerning the purchase price of this land. Supervisor McGraw moved for approval of the prepared resolution. RESOLUTION 84-229 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN PROPERTY AND TO TAKE POSSESSION OF AND OWNERSHIP IN CERTAIN REAL ESTATE IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND RESERVOIR BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a water supply system and reservoir in the western portion of Roanoke County is necessary to provide a source of water for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley. In order to provide this water supply system it will be - ~ ~ 376 December 18, 1984 necessary to acquire, take possession of and ownership in certain real estate described as follows: I a) Approximately 10.0 acres, more or less, owned by Harry W. Young and Kathleen M. Young being known officially by Map Number 83.00-1-5 and more particularly described in Deed Book 930, page 438. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $5,900.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. b) Approximately 51.50 acres, more or less, owned by H. M. Obenchain being a portion of a larger tract of real estate consisting of approximately 61 acres and more particularly described in Deed Book 1035, page 149. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $11,113.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. I c) Approximately 54.51 acres, more or less, owned by Mary Ann Wohlford being a portion of a larger tract of real estate consisting of approximately 61 acres and more particularly described in Deed Book 816, page 500. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $27,908.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. d) Approximately 167.00 acres, more or less, owned by Harold D. Reynolds and Betty Reynolds; Jerry L. Link and Kathleen V. Link; and L. Glenn Knapp and Shirley B. Knapp being a portion of a larger tract of real estate consisting of approximately 289.50 acres and more particularly described in Deed Book 1151, page 224. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $86,000.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. 2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take such property and commence construction of said water supply system and reservoir and any other I appurtenances to a water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of the Roanoke Valley and to thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said properties and interests in real estate; and ----- i~ ~ 377 December 18, 1984 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and §15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights I pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided and privileges and provisions of said §15.1-238 (e) as to the vesting of powers in the County pursuant to §§33.1-119 through 33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made and provided by law. On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens NAYS: None Public hearing on adoption of a resolution pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended setting forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter upon certain property and take possession of and ownership of certain real estate and easements in connection with the construction of a water supply system including water tank, booster station, water lines and access easements I APPROVED John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, reported that this property is needed for the EPA Super Fund Project that will supply potable water to the Big Hill area. Roanoke County is proceeding on behalf of the EPA in obtaining all necessary property. The property required is the tank lot and access across the Hurt property and the booster station lot on the Richards property. Mr. Richard Hurt, Route 3, Box 154, Salem, Virginia, was present opposing the price the County is offering for the land. Mr. Hubbard reported that a half million gallon tank I which stands about 45 feet above ground would be installed at this site. Mr. Danny Richards, 5488 Yale Drive, Salem, Virginia, was also present to oppose Roanoke County's purchase of this ---- property. ~ ~ 378 December 18, 1984 Supervisor McGraw moved for approval of the prepared resolution. I RESOLUTION 84-230 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN PROPERTY AND TO TAKE POSSESSION OF AND OWNERSHIP IN CERTAIN REAL ESTATE AND EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a water supply system, including a water tank, booster station, water lines and access easements in that portion of Roanoke County known as "Big Hill" is necessary to provide a source of water for the citizens of that area. In order to provide this water supply system it will I be necessary to acquire, take possession of and ownership in certain real estate and easements described as follows: a) A tank lot (0.229 ac.); a 20' water line and 10' temporary construction easement; a 20' access easement and 20' slope easement across the property of Carrie B. Hurt being known officially by Tax Map No. 64.03-1-7, and more particularly described in Deed Book 480, page 336. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $1,999.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. b) A booster station lot (0.035 ac.) and IS' water line easement and slope easement across the property of Helen Cox Richards being known officially by Tax Map No. 64.02-2.10 and more particularly described in Deed Book 484, page 150 and Deed Book 245, page 314. The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be acquired is $2,231.00, such compensation and damages, if any, having been offered the property owners. I 2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take such property and commence construction of said water supply system and any other appurtenances to a water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of the Roanoke Valley and to thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said properties and interests in real estate; and ----- I~ ".- :3 ~l ~ December 18, 1984 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and §15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights I and privileges and provisions of said §15.1-238 (e) as to the vesting of powers in the County pursuant to §§33.1-119 through 33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made and provided by law. On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None Public hearing on an Ordinance amending the County's Franchise Ordinance with Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc., to provide for a decrease in the maximum monthly charges for the first set including converter APPROVED Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, presented the proposed I amendment to the ordinance. No one was present in opposition. Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the prepared resolution. ORDINANCE 84-231 AMENDING THE COUNTY'S FRANCHISE ORDINANCE WITH ROANOKE VALLEY CABLEVISION, INC. TO PROVIDE FOR A DECREASE IN THE MAXIMUM MONTHLY CHARGES FOR THE FIRST SET INCLUDING CONVERTER WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc. has voluntarily agreed to mutually establish a reduction in the maximum monthly rate for basic cable television service by amendment to the County's franchise ordinance with Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc. as set forth in a letter to this Board dated November 14, 1984. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors I of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Section 10, Rates and charges, of the County's franchise ordinance with Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc. enacted by Ordinance Nos. 1178, 1544 and 84-120b. dated January 28, 1975, July 13, 1976, and July 24, 1984, as amended, is hereby modified and amended as follows: Section 10. Rates and charges. A. Subscriber services. ----- L ,., 380 December 18, 1984 I * * * * Basic Service A. Residential Rates Installation Charges First set Each additional set $15.00 7.50 Monthly Charges Not Less Than Not More Than --- --- First set including converter $7.50 $7.50 Each additional set including converter 2.25 5.00 Miscellaneous Charges Reconnect Move to location with existing outlet Move connection within home Home antenna/CATV switch $8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 $10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 B. Commercial Rates (single unit at one location) Installation Charges I One set $15.00 Monthly Charges Not Less Than Not More Than --- --- One set $7.50 $7.50 C. Commercial Rates (multiple units at one location) Installation charges, monthly charges, and miscellaneous charges shall be established through negotiation with the subscriber. 2. This amendment shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. NAYS: None. I Public Hearing on Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3350 enacting Chapter 2, Procurement Practices. Held Over to January 8, 1985 Public Hearing on Ordinance amending Chapter 21, zoning, of the Roanoke County Code to establish screening and buffering provisions upon the recommendation to the Zoning Administrator APPROVED ~ ~ ".- 'z¡ 3~î December 18, 1984 Rob Stalzer, Planning Coordinator, was present to answer any questions of the Board. Mr. Stalzer reported that the ordinance does not discourage innovative landscape design. I Supervisor Burton requested definitions for yard, visual screening, and buffer yards be included in the ordinance. Mr. Stalzer reported that yard is already in the original zoning ordinance. Mr. Stalzer also reported that buffer yard and visual screening has been included. Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the prepared ordinance. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21, ZONING, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO SCREENING AND BUFFERING PROVISIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 21-1, Definitions of Chapter 21, zoning, of the Roanoke County Code relating to screening and buffering provisions be amended by the repeal of the definition "Landscaped area" and "Screen planting". 2. That Section 21-50, Yards be amended to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-50. Yards. Single-family and two-family dwellings in an R-3 District shall conform with the regulations for Residential District R-l. Two-family dwellings in an R-3 District shall conform with the regulations for the Residential District R-2. Townhouses and high-rise apartments shall conform to the requirements of Article XVIII and XIX, respectively. Multi-family dwellings shall have the following minimum yards: I a. Side. Twenty feet wft~eft-sfta:l::I:-~8e}Hðe-sefee8 ~~a8~~8~-Wfte8-aðje~8~8~--R-:l:-a8ð-R-~-B~s~f~e~s. Each side yard shall be increased ten feet for each story over two and one-half stories. b. Rear. Each main building shall have a minimum rear yard of twenty feet wft~eft-sfta~:I:-~8e~Hðe sefee8-~}a8~~8~-Wfte8-aðje~8~8~-R-~-a8ð-R-~ B~s~f~e~s~ * * * * 3. That Section 21-54, Parking be amended to read and I provide as follows: Sec. 21-54. Parking. Parking regulations in an R-3 District shall conform tc Article XV of this chapter. A-:l:a8ðsea~eð-afea-e€-a~-:l:eas~-s~*-€ee~-~8-W~ð~ft-Sfta:l::I: ee-ffia~8~a~8eð-a~-a:l::I:-~~ffieS-Be~Wee8-~afk~8~-a8ð-a8Y-S~fee~ way-:l:~8e-ef-a8y-:l:e~-~e8eð-€ef-fes~ðe8~~a}-Hses~ 4. That Section 21-55, Screening regulations be ----- repealed in its entirety. L 3t:S2 December 18, 1984 I 5. That Section 21-60, Screen planting be repealed in its entirety. 6. That Section 21-60.1:9, Parking be amended to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-60.1:9. Parking. tat Parking regulations in a R-5 District shall conform to Article XV of this chapter. tðt--A-:l:aftàsea~eà-a~ea-sfia:l::I:-ðe-ffia~fi~a~fieà-as fe:l::l:ews-:- t:l:t--ðe~weeft-~fie-~a~k~ft~-a~ea-afià-~fie-s~~ee~ ~~~fi~-ef-way-:l:~fie---s~x-t6t-fee~ t~t--ðe~Weeft-afiy-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-aftà-afiy-R-:I: Res~àeft~~a:l:-B~s~~~e~---as-~~ev~àeà-~fi-~:I:-6e.:I:-:-:l:e 7. That Section 21-60.1:10, Buffering and screening be repealed in its entirety. 8. That Section 21-60.2:7, Yards be amended to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-60.2:7. Yards. Condominiums shall have the following m1n1mum yards: a. Side. Twenty feet wfi~efi-sfia:l::I:-~fie~eàe-~fie ~e~e~~eà-~eft-fee~-Se~eeft-~:l:afi~~fi~-a~ea-wfieft aàje~fi~fi~-a-R-:l:-B~s~~~e~. Each side yard shall be increased ten feet for each story over two and one-half stories. I b. Rear. Each main building shall have a minimum rear yard of twenty feet wfi~efi-sfia:l::I:-~fte~eàe-~fie ~e~e~~eà-~efi-fee~-Se~eeft-~~aft~~fi~-a~ea-wfieft aàje~fi~fi~-a-R-:l:-B~s~~~e~. * * * * 9. That Section 21-60.2:11, Parking be amended to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-60.2:11. Parking. tat Parking regulations in an R-6 District shall conform to Article XV of this chapter. tðt--A-:l:afiàsea~eà-a~ea-sfia:l:~-ðe-ffia~fi~a~fieà-as fe~:l:ews-:- t:l:t--ðe~weefi-~fie-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-afià-~fie-s~~ee~ ~~~fi~-ef-way-:l:~fie---s~x-t6t-fee~ t~t--ðe~weeft-~fie-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-afià-afiy-aàjaeefi~-R-:I: B~s~~~e~---~efi-t:l:et-fee~ 10. That Section 21-60.2:12, Screening regulations be I repealed in its entirety. 11. That Section 21-75, Area, frontage regulations; screen plantings be amended to read follows: Sec. 21- 7 5 . and yard and provide as Area, frontage and yard regulations; se~eeft ~~aft~~fi~s. There are no area, frontage and yard regulations in a B-3 District, except for off-street parking which shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article XV. Wfieft-aðe~~~fi~-afiy-~es~àeft~~a~-à~s~~~e~-se~eefi ~~aft~~fi~-aftà-a-æ~ft~æeæ-ya~à-ef-~efi-fee~-sfia~:I:-ðe-~~ev~àeà-a~efi~ r--- .~ "...- l 3 December 18, 1984 ~fie-~fe~ef~y-!iAe. 12. That a new article, Article XVII.l, Screening and buffering, be enacted to read and provide as follows: Article XVII. 1 Screening and Buffering Sec. 21-132-1. Intent. I a. The intent of this article is to set minimum standards that reduce common conflicts associated with incompatible adjacent land uses and that protect the natural boundaries among properties. The standards seek to promote visual harmony, reduce noise, divert emissions, restrict passage, and enhance the natural environment - thereby providing for a compatible mix of otherwise conflicting land uses. b. The requirements of this article are intended to encourage, not hamper, innovation in landscape and architectural design and shall be administered with reasonable consideration given this objective. Sec. 21-132-2. Administration. a. The provisions of this article shall apply to all building site developments that are subject to site plan review in Article XXI Site Plan. b. In addition to the site plan requirements listed in Article XXI, screening and buffering specifications shall be submitted. The plan shall explicitly describe changes to the existing groundcover, landscape improvements, buffer yards, screens, and the physical design relationship of the building site to surrounding properties. Required planting shall be conducted within the beginning of the first opportune planting season following approval of final development plans but may be coordinated with construction scheduling. I c. All lawfully non-conforming uses are exempt from these requirements until non-conforming status is terminated, as provided in Article XIV Non-Conforming Use. d. Standards iInposed by conditional rezoning shall take precedence over the provisions of this article. e. All property boundaries which adjoin the limits of another local government jurisdiction shall comply with the provisions of this article. f. Administrative determinations of the requirements of this article are subject to appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals, as provided in Section 21-174 part (a). Sec. 21-132-3. Modification or waiver. I The screening and planting requirements of this article shall be applied equally to all similarly-classified and situated properties but may be modified or waived in certain cases where a building site is subject to any of the following circumstances, as determined by the Director of Planning: a. Natural land characteristics would achieve the same intent of this article; ~ ~ ~ December 18, 1984 ~..t...> "~i 4. uO . b. Innovative landscape or architectural design is employed to achieve an equivalent screening and buffering effect. Sec. 21-133-4. General Standards. I a. Building site shall refer to the lot on which these screening and buffering requirements are to be applied. b. Screening shall refer to the construction of a visually opaque, physical barrier of specified height within a required buffer yard. 1. Screening materials shall be continuously maintained, present an attractive exterior appearance, and be of durable construction. 2. Unless otherwise noted, acceptable screening materials include wood stockade fences, decorative masonry walls, brick walls, and earth berms. 3. All refuse service and outdoor storage areas on townhouse and multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial sites shall be screened from surrounding views. 4. Location of screening shall not obstruct the visibility of traffic circulation. I c. Planting shall refer to the preservation of existing vegetation or planting of new growth within a required buffer yard as specified. 1. Where on-center spacing of new plantings is not specified, the planting may be irregularly dispersed throughout the buffer yard yet shall be organized to maximize the screening and buffering objectives. 2. At time of planting, all new evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of five feet and all new deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of one inch as defined by the American Association of Nurserymen. 3. Where required, each large deciduous tree shall have an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater, and one shall be planted for each 30 linear feet of buffer yard. 4. Where required, each large evergreen tree shall have an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater, and one shall be planted for each 20 linear feet of buffer yard. I 5. Where required, each small evergreen tree shall have an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater, and one shall be planted for each 15 linear feet of buffer yard. 6. Where required, all evergreen shrubs shall have an ultimate height of six feet or greater, be at least 18 inches at time of planting, and be planted 5 feet on center or less. 7. Where a parking lot is adjacent to a public street right-of-way, one small evergreen shrub of - ~ ~ 185 December 18, 1984 three feet ultimate height and 18 inches at time of planting, planted for each five feet of linear distance, and one small or large deciduous or evergreen tree planted for 30 feet of linear distance shall be provided along the parking lot perimeter. All plantings shall be continuously maintained, shall not interfere with the use of adjoining properties, and shall not obstruct the visibility of traffic circulation. I d. Buffer yard shall refer to a landscaped strip of specified width along certain segments of the building site perimeter. 1. The buffer yard shall be reserved solely for screening and plantings, no driveways (except where necessary for safe access), parking areas, nor building structures shall be permitted. 2. The amount of required buffer yard shall not be more than 10 percent of the total building site area, but in such case that the buffer yard is reduced, the amount of planting and screening shall be proportionately increased. Sec. 21-132-5. Table of requirements. The required types of screening, buffer yards, and plantings for a building site are established by the land use intensity of adjoining properties. To find the requirement, read across the table to the land use intensity class of the building site, and read down the table to the class of the adjoining property. Refer to the keys in Sections 21-132-6 and 7 for an interpretation of the minimum standards. I Land Use Intensity Building Site Adjoining Site III IV V VI VII I A B B C D II B C C D E III C C D E IV ~ E ~ Sec. 21-132-6. Key of land use intensity classes. a. The intensity of land use is identified according to the following key: I Class I All agriculture and related uses permitted in the A-I and R-E Districts and all public park, open space, and recreation uses permitted in any District. Class II Single family dwelling permitted in the A-I, R-E, R-l, R-2, and R-3 Districts. ----- ~ 1 3ðô December 18, 1984 I Class III Two-family dwelling, townhouse, multi-family dwelling, and condominium dwelling permitted in the A-I, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-6, and B-1 Districts. Class IV Mobile home park permitted in the R-4 District. Class V All institutional and commercial uses permitted in the A-I and in any residential district and all uses permitted in the B-1 District. Class VI All uses permitted in the B-2 and B-3 Districts that are not permitted in a lower District. Class VII All uses permitted in the M-l, M-2 and M-3 Districts that are not permitted in a lower District. b. The class of vacant and non-conforming properties shall be determined by the predominant use of the zoning classification, e.g. a non-conforming business or vacant property in the R-l District is a Class II land. I c. The class of properties located in another local government jurisdiction shall be determined by the closest related land use that is listed in this key. Sec. 21-132-7. Key of Screening and Buffering Types. a. The optional types of required screening, buffer yard, and plantings are keyed according to the descriptions which follows: Type A 1. Option 1: -4 foot screening 2. Option 2: -7 foot buffer yard -one row of evergreen shrubs Type B 1. Option 1: -4 foot screening -7 foot buffer yard -small evergreen trees I 2. Option 2: -15 foot buffer yard -small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen shrubs Type C 1. Option 1: -6 foot screening -15 foot buffer yard -small evergreen trees 2. Option 2: -25 foot buffer yard -small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen shrubs ----- ~ ~ " :. "'. .. .,~ r :") () ,¡¡ December 18, 1984 Type D 1. Option 1: -6 foot screening -25 foot buffer yard -large evergreen trees and small evergreen trees 2. Option 2: -35 foot buffer yard -large evergreen trees, small evergreen trees, and one row of evergreen shrubs I Type E 1. Option 1: -8 foot screening -35 foot buffer yard -large deciduous trees and large evergreen trees 2. Option 2: -50 feet buffer yard -large deciduous trees, large evergreen trees, small evergreen trees, and one row of small evergreen shrubs The provisions of the ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 1985. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens. I NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS Chairman Nickens nominated Ms. Carolyn V. Pence, 1826 Cranwell Drive, Vinton, Virginia, 24179, for the Library Board. Supervisor Minter nominated Mr. Leo Trenor, 543 Petty Avenue, NE, Roanoke, Virginia, to the Management Advisory Counci. to represent Retail Management. Supervisor Brittle nominated Mr. William H. Mistele, 1309 Biscayne Road, Roanoke, Virginia to the Management Advisory Council. Supervisor McGraw nominated Mr. Douglas Hale, 443 I Ingall Boulevard, Salem, Virginia, to the Management Advisory Council to represent General Management. Supervisor McGraw nominated Mr. Brendan Wilkinson, Route 1, Box 70-B, Salem, Virginia, to the Management Advisory Council to represent Engineering. - ~ 88ð December 18, 1984 Supervisor Brittle moved to approve all nominations. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. I IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Supervisor Minter moved to adjourn until 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 19, 1985, at the Roanoke County Administration Center to consider going into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended, Section 2.1-344(a), (1), (2), (4), and (6). The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. I ~ li ~ I \", ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \. \ '\ ~. '\',,\ \. '\. \\ ~