Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/26/1982 - Regular ", 1-26-82 262 I I I Board of Supervisors Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center Salem, Virginia January 26, 1982 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day in open session at the Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center in Salem, Virginia, this being the fourth Tuesday and the second regular meeting of the month of January. Members present: Chairman Edward C. Park, Jr., Vice-Chairman Athena E. Burton, and Supervisors May W. Johnson, Robert E. t1yers and Gary J. Minter. Members absent; None IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Edward Park called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. IN RE: ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY On motion of Supervisor Burton and a unanimous voice vote, the Board received and filed the following: (1) Jail Report (2) Treasurer's Report - December 1981 (3) Annual Report - Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County. (4) Roanoke County Employees' Health Fund Report for December, 1981. At the request of Supervisor Burton, Fred Anderson, Treasurer, submitted a report including the amount of interest by fund, investments for the County have earned as of December 31, 1981. Report is filed with the minutes of this meeting and was received in file with the above-listed items. IN RE: GRANT FROB STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Capt. Mike Kavanuagh was in attendance to remind the Board of monies available from the State under the Virginia Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act which was presented at the meeting of January 12, 1982. Appropriate resolutions are now presented for consideration. He also advised that a member under the age of 18 years must be appointed to the Court Services Unit Advisory Council as provided. - I II ~ ,.... 1-26-82 263 RESOLUTION NO. 3046 DESIGNATING THE COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY BOARD AS THE YOUTH AND FAllILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD AND SETTING FORTH THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF SAID BOARD IN ITS CAPACITY AS YOUTH AND FAliILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 1. That the Court Services Unit Advisory Board is continued in I Virginia, as follows: existence and is additionally designated as the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board and, as Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, is charged with the following responsibilities: a. To establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; and to assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive youth services within the public and private sector. b. To serve in an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist I, the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "Minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". c. To assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of I youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, and further, to participate in evaluating the imp lemen- tation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board of Supervisors. d. To provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. e. To advocate necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth development and to support the development of needed services, both public and private, for youth in the community. f. To from time to time report to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and request citizen and public and private agency personnel to submit specific information and make recommendations concerning needs I of youth in Roanoke County. 2. That the organization and membership of the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board shall be the same as the membership of the Court Services Unit Advisory Board, the members of which shall be appointed as made and provided by resolution of the Board of Supervisors originally ~ ~ 1-26-82 264 establishing the Court Services Unit Advisory Board, the members of which shall be appointed as aforesaid; provided however, one member of the advisory board shall be a person under the age of 18 years who shall be designated as the youth member of the advisory board, the youth I member's service on the advisory board to be a term of one year. AYES: NAYS: DESCRIPTION Class: Fund: Dept: Dept: Object: I Class: Fund: Source: Source: Class: Fund: Dept: AYES: NAYS: IN RE: Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote. Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park None APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION NO. 3047 - YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER INCREAS (DECREAS Expenditures General Transfer to Grant Projects Fund 03-6-01960-90060 $ 9,991 Youth and Family Services Salaries 03-6-03105-10010 (9,991 Revenue Grant Projects Revenue from State Transfer from General Fund 60-5-24040-00000 60-5-51030-00000 16,948 9,991 Expenditures Grant Projects Delinquency Prevention Grant 60-6-64033-00000 $26,939 Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote. Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park None EXECUTIVE SESSION On motion of Supervisor Burton and a unanimous voice vote, the Board went into Executive session at 6:10 p.m. to discuss legal, real estate and personnel matters. I IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Park called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. on motion of Supervisor Myers who stated the Executive session was recessed; motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote. ~ 1-26-82 265 IN RE: INVOCATION Invocation was offered by John C. Chambliss, Director of Finance, and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited in unison. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS REQUEST OF RUTH A. DELEO FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A * HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT TO CONDUCT A SECRETARIAL SERVICE * APPROVED IN HER HOME AT 849 FINNEY DRIVE IN THE VINTON MAGIS- * TERIAL DISTRICT. * Mrs. DeLeo was present to support her request and no one appeared in opposition. On motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote, the request was approved for a two-year period. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST OF AWARDS & TROPHY COMPANY OF VIRGINIA FOR A * SPECIAL EXCEPTION UNDER SECTION 21-67 (6) OF THE ZONING * ORDINANCE TO OPERATE A GAME ROOM, KNOWN AS VIDEO VILLAGE, * APPROVE IN THE ROANOKE-HOLLINS SHOPPING CENTER AT 7213 WILLIAMSON * ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. * Tim Gubala, County Planner, informed the Board that hours of operation for this game room will be: Monday thru Thursday 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; Friday and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday from 1:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. There will be a snack bar operated on the premises and an attendant on duty during open hours. A one-year permit is recommended with the conditions included. On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote, the request was approved for a one-year period and the above-listed condition . AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO AMEND SECTION 21-113 * AND SECTION 21-129 OF ARTICLE XVII (SIGN REGULATIONS) OF *APPRO ~D CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH PROVISIONS* FOR THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS. * ORDINANCE NO. 3048 AMENDING CHAPTER 21, ZONING, ARTICLE XVII, SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TEMPORARY SIGNS. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: --- 1. That Article XVII, Sign Regulations of Chapter 21, Zoning, be ~, I I I ~ 1-26-82 266 amended as follows: Article XVII. Sign Regulations. * ,,;'( ";~ * I Sec. 21-113. Types of Signs. * * * * (f) Temporary sign. An on-premises sign applying to a seasonal or other brief activity such as, but not limited to, summer camps, horse shows, auctions, store openings, special sales, or sale of land. Temporary signs shall not exceed sixty (60) square feet in sign area. ";~ ok ";~ * (j) Portable Sign. A temporary on-premises sign whose structure is not permanently affixed to the ground nor to a building. ";~ i't * -J( Sec. 21-129. Temporary Signs. (a) Temporary signs denoting firms, such as architectural, engineering or construction firms, engaged in the work on a construction site, or announcing future use of the property shall be permitted in any district; provided, that such signs shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet for each firm or future use identified. I (b) A portable sign may be allowed in Districts B-1, B-2, M-l, M-2, and M-3 provided: (1) The sign area is less than sixty (60) square feet. (2) Each sign advertises an activity or product to be displayed or sold on premises. (3) The sign can be placed for a period of no more than ninety (90) consecutive days with a temporary sign permit. (4) No establishment may display a portable sign more than one hundred twenty (120) days in a calendar year. (5) The sign cannot be located closer than ten (10) feet to the right-of-way. (6) Portable signs shall be located on the same lot; however, in a shopping center of more than three stores, additional portable signs may be placed so long as they are two hundred (200) feet apart. I (7) A temporary sign permit shall be required for the placing of a portable sign for each period. However, a 30-day take-away period between the issuance of each temporary sign permit for the same establishment is required. An annual permit may be purchased by a business who may seek to utilize portable signs in accordance with the provisions above. Such fees shall be set by separate ordinance and maintained in the office of the Zoning Administrator. This amendment to be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None ~ ~ 1-26-82 267 IN RE: REQUEST OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO AMEND SECTION * 21-116 OF ARTICLE XVII (SIGN REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER * 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ALLOW FOR ASSESSMENT * CONTINUED OF A REASONABLE FEE FOR A SIGN PERMIT ISSUED FOR THE * PLACEMENT OF ANY SIGN IN ROANOKE COUNTY. * Tim Gubala, County Planner, informed the Board that due to incle- I ment weather, the Planning Commission did not hear this request as scheduled and therefore, has no recommendation. He sugggested this matter be continued to give the Planning Commission an opportunity for a public hearing and recommendation; motion for continuance was made by Supervisor Myers and a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: REQUEST OF JOSEPH C. AND LEWIS P. THOMAS TO REZONE TWO * PARCELS OF LAND CONTAINING 3.362 ACRES FROM BUSINESS * DISTRICT B-1 TO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT M-2 LOCATED IN FORT * APPROVE LEWIS INDUSTRIAL PARK ON U. S. ROUTE 11/460 WEST OF SALEM * IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. * Mr. Joe Thomas was in attendance to support his request and no one appeared in opposition. SPREAD FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of I land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from Business District B- 1 to Manufacturing District M-2. Northerly portion of Tract B containing 1.146 acres BEGINNING at a point on the east side of Shawnee Drive being the northwesterly corner of Tract B and the southwesterly corner of Tract A; thence leaving Shawnee Drive and following a line between Tracts A and B, N. 81035' 24" E. 124.75 feet to a point on the line of Charles L. Whitt, Jr. property; thence with the Whitt property S. 80 57' 48" E. 74.29 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Whitt property and property herein described, N. 820 07' 16" E. 144.64 feet to a point on the line of Louise Moore property; thence with the Moore property S. 80 40' 44" E. 125.00 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Moore property and property herein described; N. 820 07' 16" E. 313.26 feet to a point on the line of Edith L. Hobbs property; thence with the Hobbs property S. 90 41' 12" E. 10.0 feet to a point on the division line of the Districts B-1 and M-2 zoning lines; thence following the line between District B-1 and M-2 through Tract B, S. 810 35' 24" W. 579.16 feet to a point on the east side of Shawnee Drive; thence leaving the zoning line and following the east side of Shawnee Drive, N. 90 45' W. 213.59 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 1.146 acres. I Northerly portion of Tract E containing 2.216 acres BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Shawnee Drive being the northeasterly corner of Tract E of Fort Lewis Industrial Park recorded in the Clerk's Office of Circuit Court of Roanoke County in P. B. 9, p. 202, said point also being the southeasterly corner of Tract F; thence leaving Tract F and following westerly side ~~ I I ~ 1-26-82 -- - - 268 I Shawnee Drive, S. 90 45' E. 186.65 feet to a point on the Zoning District line dividing District B-1 and District M-2; thence leaving Shawnee Drive and following the Zoning District line through Tract E, S. 810 35' 24" W. 758.67 feet to a point on the line of property of Bolling Steel Company, Inc.; thence with line of Bolling Steel Co., Inc. property and property herein described, N. 130 32' 35" W. 10.0 feet to a point corner to the Floyd G. Smith property; thence with Smith property and property herein described, N. 6r 44' 48" E. 149.29 feet to a point; thence N. 5r 56' 46" E. 106.96 feet to a point; thence N. 170 01' 25" W. 34.83 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Smith property and property herein described N. 700 06' E. 292.02 feet to a point being the southwesterly corner of Tract F; thence with Tract F and property herein described S. 800 15' W. 231.38 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 2.216 acres. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Myers and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None I IN RE: TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY Ms. Sheila Dooley was in attendance to inform the Board of last year's programs in which TAP was involved. She up-dated the Board on programs such as alcohol abuse, conununity outreach, head start, and a program whereby they helped citizens retain their homes when they were about to lose them. The Board thanked Ms. Dooley for appearing and conunended the superb job TAP is doing for Roanoke County citizens. IN RE: STATUS ON COURTHOUSE DESIGN-DEVELOPMENT PHASE Administrator Flanders advised that Mr. Danny Bolt will appear at the February 9th meeting to present the status on the design of the court- house. They currently are "redoing" some work on the drawings and asked I for a continuance. Board concurred for Feb. 9 meeting. IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION Administrator Flanders requested an executive session at the end of the meeting to discuss, legal, real estate and personnel matters. ~ ~ 1-26-82 269 IN RE: RESOLUTION NO. 3049 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN EASEMENTS WANTED AND NEEDED BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CERTAIN INTERCEPTOR SEWER LINE IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO SEEK A RIGHT-OF-ENTRY UPON PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, ITS EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS PENDING A FINAL RESOLUTION OF SAID CONDEMNATION PROCEEDING. I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County of Roanoke has determined that a certain interceptor sewer project within Roanoke County; i.e., the Tinker Creek Sewer Project, is necessary in order to promote the health and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County; and Ii 2. That certain easements are wanted and needed by the County of Roanoke in order to proceed with said sewer interceptor project and a bona fide offer to acquire same has been made, which said bona fide offer has been refused; and the aforesaid easements wanted and needed by the County of Roanoke are more particularly described as follows, to- wit: : Ii 'I (a) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Herman A. and I Leonora Trout Bolster, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center of Tinker Creek on the boundary between property of Herman A. and Leonora Trout Bolster and Fred R. and Helen M. Murko, which point is 175 feet, more or less, south- west of the northeast corner of the Murko property and being designated as Point "A" on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department; thence 55 feet more or less in a northwesterly direction and 140 feet more or less in a northeasterly direction running generally parallel to Tinker Creek to a point on the boundary between property of Herman A. and Leonora Trout Bolster and Johann W. Keller, which point is 55 feet more or less northwest of the northeast corner of the property of Herman A. and Leonora Trout Bolster. Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $316.00. I (b) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Ethel P. Stokes, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the common boundary of property of Ethel P. Stokes and Ernestine M. Vinyard, which point is 85 feet more or less west of the northeast corner of Ethel P. Stokes' tract; thence, generally parallel to Tinker Creek in a southerly direction, 200 feet more or less to a point, thence in the same direction 314 feet more or less to a point; thence in a southeast direction 110 feet ~ ~ 1-26-82 . . . 2ft 0 More or less to a point on the east side of Tinker Creek, which point is 105 feet more or less north of the southeast corner of property of Plantation Enterprises, Inc. I Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $530.00. (c) A 20' permanent easement across the property of John A. and Iris P. Bostian, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the common boundary of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, map of Ardmore, which point is 18.5 feet north of an iron pin in said boundary and which pin is 57.05 feet northeast of the common corner of said lots; thence south 47 deg. 36' 21" east 103.65 feet to a point in the common boudary of Lots 3 and 4 of said map; said point being 15.83 feet northeast of an iron pin in said boundary, said pin being 60.34 feet northeast of the common corner of said lots, as shown on a plat attached hereto and made a part hereof. Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $818.00. I (d) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Ronald L. Webster, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the boundary of property of Ronald L. Webster and Johann W. and Mary V. Keller, which point is 100 feet more or less northwest from an angle in the southwest boundary of property of Ronald L. Webster; thence 57 feet more or less in a northeasterly direction to a point; and 133 feet more or less in a northeasterly direction to a point; thence 92 feet more or less northeasterly direction to a point in the boundary between the property of Ronald L. Webster and Gaynelle Franklin; which point is 55 feet more or less south of an angle in the southwest boundary of the Franklin tract, for a total distance of 282 feet more or less. Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $460.00. (e) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Johann W. and Mary V. Keller, the center line of which is described as follows: I Beginning at a point on the boundary between property of Johann W. and Mary V. Keller and Herman A. and Leonora Trout Bolster, which point is 55 feet more or less northwest of the northeast corner of the Bolster tract; thence in a northeasterly direction running generally parallel to Tinker Creek for a distance of 120 feet more or less, thence 250 feet more or less in a northeasterly direction to a point on the boundary of property of Johann W. and Mary V. Keller and Ronald L. Webster, which point is 100 feet more or less northwest from an angle in the southwest boundary of the Webster tract. Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. - -~ ,.... 1-26-82 271 The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $507.00. (f) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Walter C. and Mary E. Shelton, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the common boundary of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Map of Ardmore, which point is 55 feet, more or less, northeast of the common corner of said lots; thence 87 feet, more or less, in a southeast direction and 13 feet, more or less, in said direction to a point on the common boundary of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 of said map, which point is 72 feet, more or less, northeast of the common corner of said lots. I Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $580.00. (g) A 20' permanent easement across the property of J. Wayne and Barbara F. Holley, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the common boundary of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Map of Ardmore, which point is 52 feet, more or less, northeast of the common corner of said lots; thence 37 feet, more or less, in a northwest direction to a point; thence in said direction 107 feet, more or less, to a point in the right-of-wa~ of Ardmore Drive, which point is 43 feet, more or less, northeast of the west corner of said Lot #1. I .. Also an additional area described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southeast boundary of Ardmore Drive, which point is 53 feet, more or less, northeast of the west corner of said lot, thence 5 feet, more or less, in a southeast direction to a point on the northeast boundary of the perpetual easement; thence 40', more or less, in a northeast direction to a point on the boundary of Ardmore Drive, and with said Drive in a southwest direction to the point of beginning. Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $991.00. (h) A 20' permanent easement across the property of Claude N. and Madeliene B. Smith, the center line of which is described as follows: ! Beginning at a point on the north right-of-way boundary of Ardmore Drive, which is 30.56 feet, more or less, east of the common corner of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Ardmore; thence in a northerly direction 176 feet, more or less, to a point and in a northeasterly direction 80 feet, more or less, to a point in the common boundary of Lot 2 of said map and property of Robert E. Lucas, which point is 60 feet, more or less, east of the northwest corner of said Lot 2. I Together with a 10' wide construction easement as shown on a certain plat prepared by the Engineering Division of the Roanoke County Utility Department. The fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $1,329.00. - ~~ 1-26-82 2,72". 3. That the County of Roanoke, in order to proceed with the Tinker Creek Sewer Project in an expeditious and orderly fashion needs to immediately enter upon the hereinabove described property and the County Attorney, in the petition for condemnation, is authorized and directed to seek a right of entry as made and provided by law and in furtherance thereof is authorized and directed to pay into Court the hereinabove set forth fair market value of each said interest to be acquired, the same to be placed in an interest bearing account for the benefit of each said property owner pending a final determination of said proceeding or other order of the Court. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: RESOLUTION NO. 3050 WAIVING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY WATER ORDINANCE AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY SEWER RULES AND REGULATIONS IN REGARD TO A SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON STATE ROUTE 622 AND KNOWN AS CAMERON SUBDIVISION. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board hereby waives the requirements of the Roanoke County Water Ordinance contained in Section 20.1-5 of the Roanoke County Code in regard to Cameron Subdivision located on State Route 622, said waiver being based upon a demonstration by the property owners that strict compliance with the provisions of the above section of the Water Ordinance would impose an undue hardship and burden upon the property owners, applicable construction standards as set forth in said ordinance to, however, remain in full force and effect; and 2. That the Board hereby waives the requirements of the Roanoke County sewer rules and regulations relating to the requirement that certain properties must connect to public sewers, as it pertains only to the right to provide sewer service in regard to Cameron Subdivision located on State Route 622, said waiver being based upon a demonstration by the property owners that strict compliance with the provisions of such rules and regulations would impose an undue hardship and burden upon the property owners, applicable construction standards as set forth 1-26-82 273 in said rules and regulations to, however, remain in full force and effect; and 3. That this Board shall authorize no further waivers unless and until it has been demonstrated to this Board that the failure to grant such waivers shall create an undue hardship upon the property owners. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Myers and the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: RESOLUTION NO. 3051 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN OFFER MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR DRILLING AND BLASTING CERTAIN ROCK RELATING TO THE CAVE SPRING TRANSMISSION MAIN (PROJECT 81-5- W). BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a certain offer of DAMA, Inc., being the lowest and best offer, in an amount not to exceed $1,640 plus the cost of explosives for drilling and blasting certain rock relating to the Cave Spring Transmission Main (Project 81-5-W) made in accordance with the bidder's proposal and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator be, and he hereby is authorized and directed to enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney with DAMA, Inc. for this construction; and 3. That all other bids for this construction are hereby rejected and the Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's appreciation for submitting such bids. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Myers and the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS GRIEVANCE PANEL Held over at the request of Supervisor Burton. COURT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL On motion of Supervisor Burton and a unanimous voice vote, Mr. Norman Schaefer, 1948 Cambridge Drive, Vinton, Virginia, was appointed for 1-26-82 274 a three year term to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council beginning January 26, 1982 and expiring January 26, 1985. IN RE: APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY - PENDING SUIT Supervisor Minter informed of a suit now pending whereby 65 citizen including himself, have brought action against the United States of America, the State Corporation Conunission of Virginia, and Appalachian Power Company relative to compensation by citizens to Appalachian when Congress abrogated the license validly issued to Appalachian Power by the Federal Power Commission in order to develop its Blue Ridge hydroelectric project on New River. Mr. Minter requested the Board to adopt and dispatch a resolution addressed to Virginia State Attorney General Gerald Baliles requesting him to intervene the State on behalf of the petitioners in support of the relief which is being sought for the benefit of all Virginia citizens in order that rates not be increased for the citizens to pay the cost of the aborted project. On motion of Supervisor Minter and a unanimous voice vote,. County Attorney James Buchholtz was directed to research and present a resolution in order that it may be brought up at the Virginia Association of Counties meeting in early February. IN RE: ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY Supervisor Johnson stated it has come to her attention that since the resignation of John Lampros as Commonwealth Attorney and the replacement in that position by Thomas M. Blaylock, that a resolution should be adopted to provide for the title and salary of Chief Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, for which position Francis W. Burkart, III now occupies. A resolution to this effect will be presented at the February 9 meeting. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote. AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park None IN RE: MOVING EXPENSES Supervisor Myers stated that the Board learned of Administrator 1-26-82 275 Flanders' purchase of a new home in the County and will be relocating his family and the Board has concurred in allowing $1,600.00 for his moving expense. APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION NO. 3052 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER INCREASE (DECREASE) Class: Fund: Dept: Object: Dept: Expenditures General County Administrator Traveling Expenses Unappropriated Balance 03-6-01201-55000 03-6-99999-99999 $1,600 ($1,600) Adopted on motion of Supervisor Myers and the following recorded vote. AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Myers and Park NAYS: None IN RE: CONTINUANCE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION On motion of Supervisor Myers and a unanimous voice vote, the Board recessed its open session and reconvened its executive session at 7:30 p.m. to discuss legal matters, real estate, and personnel at the request of Administrator Flanders and County Attorney James Buchholtz. IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 8:55 p.m. on motion of Supervisor Myers and a unanimous voice vote, the Board reconvened in open session. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT On motion of Supervisor Myers and a unanimous voice vote, the 'ourned its meeting at 8:56 p.m.