HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/22/2006 - Regular
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
August 22, 2006
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for August 22, 2006. Regular meetings
are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings
are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3,
and will be rebroadcast on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Sundays at 4:00 p.m. The
meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special
arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact
the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
Father Dean Nastos
Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation in remembrance of the five-year anniversary of September 11,
2001, and declaring September 11, 2006, as "Patriot Day" in the County of
Roanoke
2. Proclamation declaring Friday, August 25, 2006, as the seventh annual Hokie
Pride Day in the County of Roanoke
3. Recognition of the Information Technology Department for achieving first
place in the Top 10 Digital Counties Survey for county governments in the
population category of 150,000 - 249,999 for the third consecutive year
1
D. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public hearing to receive citizen comments regarding proposed amendment
to the fiscal year 2006-2007 budget in accordance with Section 15.2-2507,
Code of Virginia. (Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer)
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to appropriate lease purchase proceeds and expenditure of
$3,564,057 for school energy management equipment. (Penny A. Hodge,
Assistant Superintendent of Finance - Schools; Dr. Martin W. Misicko,
Director of Operations - Schools)
2. Request to adopt the stormwater management project list for fiscal year 2006-
2007. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development)
F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING
ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not
indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but
satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will
be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.
1. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit for the
construction of amini-warehouse facility on 14.76 acres located at 5627
Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wayne
Fralin.
2. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 8.829 acres from R-1, Low Density
Residential, to PRD, Planned Residential Development, with a maximum
density of 1.13 houses per acre located at 5815 Bent Mountain Road,
Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Qwiz Construction and
Investments, LLC.
3. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.26 acres from R-1, Low Density
Residential, to C-1, Office, in order to construct two general office buildings
located at 2404 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the
petition of R. Fralin Development Corporation.
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
2
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Second reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 8.1 "Erosion and
Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code to address steep slope
development and other technical amendments. (Arnold Covey, Director of
Community Development)
2. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing conveyance of an easement to
Appalachian Power Company on property owned by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, "Goode Park", to provide electric service for KTP, LLC,
Vinton Magisterial District. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and
Tourism)
I. APPOINTMENTS
1. Request to approve operational guidelines for the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) Review Committee. (Brent Robertson, Director of
Management and Budget)
2. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by
District)
3. Economic Development Authority
4. Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
J. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of minutes -August 8, 2006
2. Request from the schools to accept and appropriate reimbursements and
state funds in the amount of $253,335.19
3. Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $142,719
from the Department of Criminal Justice Services for a juvenile and
delinquency prevention program
4. Resolution of appreciation to Sherman L. Hopkins, General Services, upon
his retirement after seven years of service
3
5. Request from the Library Department to appropriate state funds in the amount
of $11 ,048 for fiscal year 2006-2007
6. Request to accept the donation of a new variable width public drainage
easement situated on Lots 6 through 10, Section 15, Samuel's Gate at The
Orchards subdivision, from F&W Community Development Corp., Hollins
Magisterial District
K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Reserves
3. Reserve for Board Contingency
4. Future Debt Payment Reserve
5. Accounts Paid - July 2006
6. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month
ended July 31, 2006
7. Public Safety Center Building Project Budget Report
8. Public Safety Center Building Project Change Order Report
9. Statement of the Treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy
as of July 31, 2006
O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (3)
discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for public purposes;
and Section 2.2-3711 A (1) discussion or consideration of the appointment of
specific public officers, namely appointments to the Economic Development
Authority.
P. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room - 4th floor)
4
EVENING SESSION
Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES
1. Withdrawn at the reQuest of the petitioner. Second reading of an
ordinance to rezone .69 acres and .48 acres from R1, Low Density
Residential, to C2, General Commercial District, in order to construct a retail
sales facility located at 4065 Challenger Avenue and 4053 Challenger
Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Valley Gateway, LLC.
2. Withdrawn at the reQuest of the petitioner. Second reading of an
ordinance to obtain a special use permit for the construction of an accessory
apartment on .63 acres located at 6162 Steeplechase Drive, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Victor and Elmarie Myburgh.
3. Continued until September 26. 2006. Second reading of an ordinance
amending Section 5-29. "Same-Impoundment" of Article II. "Dogs, Cats and
Other Animals" of Chapter 5. "Animals and Fowl" to increase the daily
impoundment fee charged by Roanoke County from $8.75 to $10.00 per day
per animal. (John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator)
4. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit for the
construction of an accessory apartment on .387 acres located at 2923
Embassy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Amina AI-
Hindi, a/kla Amina AI-Habashy. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of
Planning)
5. Second reading of an ordinance revoking a special use permit and removing
the conditions on approximately 1.9 acres located at 6044 Peters Creek
Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jesse Jones. (Philip
Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning)
T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Joseph P. McNamara
2. Joseph B. "Butch" Church
3. Michael W. Altizer
4. Richard C. Flora
5. Michael A. Wray
5
v. ADJOURNMENT
6
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. C - \
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Proclamation in remembrance of the five-year anniversary of
September 11, 2001, and declaring September 11, 2006, as
"Patriot Day" in the County of Roanoke
Elmer C. Hodge dnv~ If ~/
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On September 11, 2001, the United States was suddenly and brutally attacked by
terrorists. Each year the President of the United States issues a proclamation designating
September 11 as "Patriot Day" and directs that flags be flown at half-staff and a moment of
silence be observed beginning at 8:46 a.m. eastern daylight time to honor the thousands of
innocent victims who were injured and lost their lives as a result of these horrific acts.
The five year anniversary of 9/11 will be remembered in communities across the nation.
To mark the date here at home, the Board is issuing a proclamation in remembrance of the
anniversary, and declaring September 11, 2006, as "Patriot Day" in the County of
Roanoke.
Roanoke County is also participating in a regional event to mark the five-year anniversary.
A regional 9/11 committee spearheaded by the City of Roanoke has planned a memorial
service for Sunday, September 10,2006, at 7:00 p.m. The event will be held in downtown
Roanoke in front of the City's market building. Chairman Wray will participate in the event
by introducing Congressman Bob Goodlatte as the key note speaker.
The Regional 9/11 Committee has members from the following localities: City of Roanoke,
Town of Vinton, and Counties of Roanoke, Bedford, Franklin, and Botetourt. Also included
on the committee are representatives from the Western Virginia Emergency Medical
Services Council, the Western Virginia Water Authority, and the Roanoke City and
Roanoke County Sheriff's Office, Police and Fire - Emergency Medical Services.
Present to accept the proclamation will be Donna Furrow, Assistant Chief of Police; Daryell
Sexton, Battalion Chief with Fire and Rescue; and Gerald Holt, Sheriff. Teresa Hamilton
Hall, Public Information Officer, will provide information regarding the memorial service.
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
PROCLAMATION IN REMEMBRANCE OF THE FIVE-YEAR
ANNIVERSARY OF SEPTEMBER 11,2001, AND DECLARING
SEPTEMBER 11,2006, AS "PATRIOT DAY" IN THE COUNTY
OF ROANOKE
WHEREAS, it has been five years since America was suddenly and brutally
attacked by terrorists on September 11, 2001; and
WHEREAS, thousands of innocent Americans were killed or injured as a result of
these attacks including the passengers and crew of the four aircraft, workers in the
World Trade Center and in the Pentagon, rescue workers and bystanders; and
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States by joint resolution on December
18, 2001, designated September 11 of each year as "Patriot Day"; and
WHEREAS, there will be a regional memorial service on September 10, 2006, in
downtown Roanoke to mark the five-year anniversary of the terrorist attacks with the
theme "In Remembrance - Not Forgotten - Here in the Roanoke Valley"; and
WHEREAS, we will always remember the innocent victims of these attacks and
be inspired by the heroism and bravery of the responders who risked their own lives to
save the lives of their fellow citizens on September 11, 2001.
NOW THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
do hereby issue this proclamation in remembrance of the five-year anniversary of the
terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001 and
designate September 11, 2006, as "PATRIOT DAY" in the County of Roanoke, and call
its significance to the attention of all of our citizens; and
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board recommends that the United
States flag be displayed at half-staff on Patriot Day, that citizens display their flags at
half-staff on that day, and that a moment of silence be observed on Patriot Day
beginning at 8:46 a.m. eastern daylight time to honor the innocent victims who lost their
lives or were injured as a result of these horrific acts.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
C-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Proclamation declaring Friday, August 25, 2006, as the
seventh annual Hokie Pride Day in the County of Roanoke
ElmerC. Hodge ~ ~
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke Valley Hokie Club has requested that the County issue a proclamation
declaring Friday, August 25, 2006, as the seventh annual Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day.
Mr. Brian Wilson, President, Roanoke Valley Tech Club, will be present to accept the
proclamation.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
PROCLAMATION DECLARING FRIDAY, AUGUST 25,2006, AS
THE SEVENTH ANNUAL HOKIE PRIDE DAY IN THE COUNTY
OF ROANOKE
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley has had a long and mutually beneficial relationship
with Virginia Tech, its alumni, and supporters; and is home to many thousands of Virginia
Tech alumni and friends of the University; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Tech has brought great positive attention to Southwest Virginia
in academics, research, and athletics; and the supporters of Virginia Tech feel great pride
in the accomplishments of the University; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Tech Hokie Club, which extends membership to any and all
supporters of Virginia Tech, is promoting Friday, August 25, 2006, as the seventh annual
Virginia Tech Hokie Pride Day; and
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke wishes to recognize the positive impact of
Virginia Tech on its community and to encourage all supporters of Virginia Tech, both
individuals and businesses, to demonstrate their Hokie pride.
NOWTHEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do
hereby proclaim Friday, August 25,2006, as the seventh annual HOKIE PRIDE DAY in the
County of Roanoke, and call its significance to the attention of all of our citizens; and
FURTHER, we extend our best wishes to Virginia Tech, its alumni, friends, and
supporters for continued success in future endeavors.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. (' - 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Recognition of the Information Technology Department for
achieving first place in the Top 10 Digital Counties Survey for
county governments in the population category of 150,000 -
249,999 for the third consecutive year
Elmer C. Hodge t If
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County placed first in the 2006 Top-10 Digital Counties Survey for the population
category of 150,000 to 249,999. The survey was conducted by the Center for Digital
Government (Center) and the National Association of Counties (NACo).
All counties in the United States were invited to participate in this survey which was
grouped into four population categories: 500,000 or more; 250,000-499,999; 150,000-
249,999; and less than 150,000. Officials responded to a set of questions that included
more than 100 measurements regarding online service delivery, infrastructure, architecture,
and governance models.
The top-ranked digital counties were recognized by the Center and NACo at the NACo
Annual Conference held on August 4-8, 2006, in Chicago, Illinois. The Board expresses its
congratulations to Ms. Elaine Carver, Director of Information Technology (IT), and the staff
in the IT Department for their success in achieving this honor for the third consecutive year.
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. D- I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Public hearing to receive citizen comments regarding proposed
amendments to the fiscal year 2006-2007 budget in
accordance with Section 15.2-2507, Code of Virginia
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane D. Hyatt
Chief Financial Officer
ElmerC. Hodge ~ i'4.t?-
County Administrator 0 I
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This is a public hearing to secure citizen's comments concerning amending the FY 2006-
2007 budget by adjusting the aggregate amount to be appropriated during the fiscal year.
Section 15.2-2507 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, provides that whenever such
amendment exceeds 1 % of the total expenditures shown in the adopted budget or
$500,000, whichever is lesser, the County must publish notice of a meeting and public
hearing. The notice must state the County's intent to amend the budget and include a brief
synopsis of the proposed budget amendment. This notice was published on August 15,
2006.
1. Request from the schools to accept and appropriate reimbursements and state funds in
the amount of $253,335.19
2. Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $142,719 from the
Department of Criminal Justice Services for a juvenile and delinquency prevention
program
3. Request to appropriate lease purchase proceeds and expenditure of $3,564,057 for
school energy management equipment
4. Request from the Library Department to appropriate state funds in the amount of
$11,048 for fiscal year 2006-2007
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of the public hearing. Requests for appropriations will
occur later on this agenda.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board hold the required public hearing. Board action
appropriating funds, as provided in this notice, will occur later during this meeting.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E -I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to appropriate lease purchase proceeds and
expenditure of $3,564,057 for school energy management
equipment
SUBMITTED BY:
Dr. Martin W. Misicko
Director of Operations and Construction - Roanoke County
Schools
Penny A. Hodge
Assistant Superintendent of Finance - Roanoke County Schools
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At their meeting on August 16, 2006, the School Board approved entering into a contract
with Pepco Energy Services to install energy management equipment throughout the
school district for a total cost of $3,854,057. The school system will provide an initial
deposit of $290,000 from funds previously appropriated for replacement HVAC and boiler
systems. The remaining $3,564,057 will be funded through a lease purchase agreement
with Citimortgage, Inc. for a period of 10 years at an interest rate of 3.9725%. The Pepco
project will be completed within 365 days per the contract and all funds will be expended
from the escrow account within the required 18 months to satisfy current federal arbitrage
rebate requirements. The lease is tentatively scheduled to close on September 5, 2006
with the first invoice from Pepco expected to be in mid-September.
The School Board has authority to enter into this contract and lease purchase without
County Board approval. This item is presented to appropriate the proceeds of the lease
purchase and the expenditure of the funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The principal and interest payments on the lease purchase will be paid from savings in
utility costs associated with the installation of energy efficient equipment by Pepco. Pepco
guarantees a minimum level of utility savings sufficient to fund the lease payments each
year for the next 10 years. If the guaranteed savings are not realized in any year of the
lease term, Pepco will pay the unrealized savings to the school system. The savings
calculations are based on baseline utility costs using the existing equipment compared to
the projected cost after the energy efficient equipment is installed. Cost increases
associated with increases in utility rates and/or expansions of school buildings are not
included in these calculations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriating the lease purchase proceeds and expenditure of
$3,564,057 for school energy management equipment.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
E-d
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
Request to adopt the stormwater management project list for
fiscal year 2006-2007
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
Arnold Covey
Director of Community Development
ElmerC. Hodge d~.- ~C?_-.,..
County Administrator ~
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At a work session held on August 8, 2006, an overview of the stormwater management
program was presented to the Board of Supervisors. Staff reviewed with the Board the
history of the stormwater management program, flood plain management, environmental
compliance, routine maintenance, and emergency projects previously approved. They also
provided a new list of projects for consideration by the Board.
Projects P-182 through P-297 were previously presented to and approved by the Board of
Supervisors. The status of these projects is shown in Exhibit A labeled "Previously
Approved Projects and Their Current Status", a copy of which is attached.
Staff is now submitting projects P-298 through P-322 with maps and justifications for
inclusion into the stormwater management program for fiscal year 2006-2007. The new
projects are prioritized according to adopted County policy and are shown in Exhibit B ,
"Proposed Projects".
Funding is available for projects remaining on the approved list as well as projects P-298
through P-312 on the new list. The remaining projects will be funded in fiscal year 2007-
2008.
1
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funding is being requested.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of these additional drainage projects for inclusion into the
stormwater management program.
2
EXHIBIT "A"
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS
P-182 - P-297
PROJECT P-182
OWNER: Paul Black (RFA 94E1199)
7549 Williamson Rd.
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #27.11-3-9
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: DELAYED TEMPORARILY
PROJECT P-183
OWNER: Danny Rivers
2417 Horsepen Mountain Circle
Falling Creek Estate
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #50.04-3-87
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-184
OWNER: Lawrence Kelly (RFA 92E974)
3587 Farmington Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $3,500
TAX MAP: #76.20-3-10
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-185
OWNER: Dorothy Overstreet (RFA 93E1097)
2725 Tanglewood Drive
Penn Forest
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,500
TAX MAP: #87.14-4-15
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-186
OWNER: Lucille lartosca (RFA 93E1152)
1313 Deer Run Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,500
TAX MAP: #61.04-2-52
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-187
OWNER: Amber Spikes
4846 Cherokee Hills Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #54.04-4-59
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-188
OWNER: Betty Saunders (RFA 94E1201)
1861 Terry Drive
DESCRIPTION: EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO AN
EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #50.03-2-15
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-189
OWNER: Mrs. Vickie Stinson
5487 West River Road
DESCRIPTION: VDOT TO INSTALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM ELIMINATING
A TRAFFIC HAZARD. ROANOKE COUNTY WILL PROVIDE
ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SUPPORT.
ESTIMATED COST: $3,000
TAX MAP: #64.03-1-34.1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-190
OWNER: David Herrick
2635 Green Ridge Circle
DESCRIPTION: EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO AN EXISTING STORM SEWER
SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $7,000
TAX MAP: #36.20-6-12
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-191
OWNER: Jeff Foutz (RFA 94E1184)
5440 Setter Road
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $3,000
TAX MAP: #40.17 -3-4
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-192
OWNER: Carl Sutter
5007 Labradore Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #40.09-3-1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-193
OWNER: Elizabeth Weaver
4415 Wyndale Av.
DESCRIPTION: INSTALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM ANDIOR ADEQUATE
CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
TAX MAP: #76.08-6-32
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-194
OWNER: Joe Farmer (RFA 95E1271)
4749 Brookwood Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
TAX MAP: #76.11-3-37
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-195
OWNER: Melinda Crosser (RFA 94E1223)
6172 Burnham Road
DESCRIPTION:
SYSTEM
REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #76.03-3-70.6
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-196
OWNER: Barbara Doyle (RFA 95E1256)
5041 Craun Lane
DESCRIPTION:
SYSTEM
REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
TAX MAP: #37.10-2-8
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-197
OWNER: Lucille Harmon
3630 Brandywine Av.
DESCRIPTION: REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #77.13-2-1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-198
OWNER: Scott Taylor
1141 Starmount Ave.
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE AND REGRADE EXISTING CHANNEL.
EXPANDED TO INCLUDE FULL REACH OF CHANNEL
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
ADDITIONAL COST: $12,000
TAX MAP: #27.09-4-9
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT: P-199
OWNER: J. D. Fralin
TAX MAP: # 38.10-7-25
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNELS BETWEEN WILLIAMSON
ROAD AND FLORIST PROJECT WILL INCLUDE PRIVATE
PARTICIPATION
ESTIMATED COST: (TOTAL) $45,000
(COUNTY) $22,500
(PRIVATE) $22,500
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: REMOVED FROM LIST
PROJECT
P-200
OWNER:
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
TAX MAP:
#38.07 -2-56
DESCRIPTION:
RELOCATE EXISTING DISCHARGE CHANNEL ONTO
COUNTY PROPERTY. FILL IN RAVINE BETWEEN COUNTY
PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTY. FILL MATERIAL
WILL BE INERT MATERIAL ONLY
ESTIMATED COST:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
$35,000
HOLLINS
COMPLETE
PROJECT
P-201
OWNER:
Raymond Nero
1689 Richland Hills Drive
DESCRIPTION:
INSTALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST:
$10,000
TAX MAP
#35.03-1-18
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
CATAWBA
STATUS:
REMOVED FROM L1STIDRAINAGE EASEMENT ISSUES
PROJECT
P-202
OWNER:
Henry Trail (RFA 95E1332)
3052 Parham Drive
DESCRIPTION:
SYSTEM
REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $30,000
TAX MAP: #79.01-1-92
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: DELAYED TEMPORARILY
PROJECT P-203
OWNER: George Igoe
3041 Embassy Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP #36.19-1-34
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-204
OWNER: Joy Kilbane
3867 Vauxhall Road
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #76.08-3-11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-205
OWNER: Bruce Young
3106 Galloway Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE OUTFALL CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,500
TAX MAP: #76.15-3-6
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-206
OWNER: Jean and Gail Holbrook
314 Woodmere Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #61.19-7-7
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-207
OWNER: Lisa Aly
5237 Cave Spring Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: 8,000
TAX MAP: #76.20-5-12
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-208
OWNER: Michael Daley (RFA 95E1335)
3055 Bradshaw Road
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,000
TAX MAP: #16.03-2-53
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-209
OWNER: Anthony Wallace
5621 Legate Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL COMPLETED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH P-124
COST: $6,500
TAX MAP: #36.19-1-42
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-210
OWNER: Bill Francis
3356 Kenwick Trail
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL EMERGENCY REPAIRS
COST: $7,500
TAX MAP: #87.06-3-41
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-211
OWNER: Peggy Stack
323 Ingal Blvd.
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT STABILE CHANNEL EMERGENCY REPAIRS
TO OUTFALL OF PIPE
COST: $8,000
TAX MAP: #54.02-2-4
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-212
OWNER: Charles Hofer
5932 Sunnycrest Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT A NEW CHANNEL FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO
NATURAL WATERCOURSE
ESTIMATED COST: $3,500
TAX MAP: # 6.03-2-5
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-213
OWNER: Gina Barringer
3422 Lakeland Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT STABLE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,555
TAX MAP: #76.19-2-58
Access 5386 Luwana Dr.
TAX MAP #76.19-2-56
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-214
OWNER: Robert Furrow
2711 Sunnyvale
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW CHANNEL FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO
NATURAL WATERCOURSE
ESTIMATED COST: $4,000
TAX MAP: #79.01-3-16
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-215
OWNER: Steven T. Doyle
1879 Elbert Drive
DESCRIPTION: INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM
SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #76.06-3-40
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-216
OWNER: Julie E. & J. R. Bell
2032 Governor Drive
DESCRIPTION: INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $18,000
TAX MAP #36.19-2-32
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-217
NAME Roger Jefferson
Darrell Brittin
4721 Starkey Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT STABLE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $16,000
TAX MAP: #87.07-4-10
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-218
OWNER: Greg Walter
8521 Barrens Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #26.08-5-18
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-219
OWNER: Doris E. and Mabel Carlson
4229 Sharolyn Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPLACE COLLAPSING CORRUGATED METAL STORM
SEWER SYSTEM WITH CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST: $25,000
TAX MAP: #86.16-4-3
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-220
NAME Charles R. Simpson
5326 Cave Spring Lane
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR AND REPLACE PORTION OF EXISTING STORM
SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $4,500
TAX MAP: #76.19-2-6
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT: P-221
OWNER: Craig S. Sellers
3616 Manassas Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $8,000
TAX MAP: #77.18-4-25
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-222
OWNER: Terry Edwards
6258 Buckland Mill Road
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $8,000
TAX MAP: #18.17 -4-26
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-223
OWNER: Paul T. and Susan Leroy
4037 Crawford Road
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING CONCRETE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #77.19-2-54
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-224
OWNER: Jonathan Bingham
2725 White Pelican
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $60,000
TAX MAP: #87.13-2-4
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: ENGINEERING UNDERWAY
PROJECT P-225
OWNER: Thomas F. Engl
5227 Rosecliff Road S. W.
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $3,000
TAX MAP: #86.11-2-4
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-226
OWNER: William V. and Marian Johnson
2850 Embassy Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #36.20-5-21
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-227
OWNER: Walt Dixon
2680 Willowlawn
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $1,000
TAX MAP: #77.05-5-21
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-228
OWNER: Iris Stone
5161 North Lake Drive
DESCRIPTION: INSTALL INLETS ALONG EXISTING SYSTEM
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #37.09-1-33, Lot 40, Blk 14, Sec II, North Lakes
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-229
OWNER: Mr. David Cushman
805 Halifax Circle
DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP: #71.10-2-23
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-230
NAME John A. and Cynthia L. D. Marco
5069 Williamsburg Court
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $500
TAX MAP: #86.08-5-24
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-231
OWNER: Don Neighbors
2020 Denise Circle
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP: #39.04-1-35
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-232
OWNER: Jerry Ogden
3446 Poff Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP: #87.10-3-11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETED
PROJECT P-233
OWNER: Michael and Karen Tripp
5081 Labradore Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #40.13-3-30
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-234
OWNER: Betty Saunders
1861 Terry Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,000
TAX MAP: #50.03-2-15
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-235
OWNER: Charles Noel
5507 Lynn Dell
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #86.16-3-13
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-236
OWNER: Richard Lee Lawrence
5004 Falcon Ridge Road
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
TAX MAP: #88.13-3-20
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-237
OWNER: Patricia Lewis
7192 Bent Mountain Road
DESCRIPTION STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #95.01-02-40
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-238
OWNER: Bernice Doran
1290 Dennis Lane
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #35.04-2-67
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-239
OWNER: Howard Pauley
3620 Manassas Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $8,000
TAX MAP: #77.18-4-26
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: ENGINEERING UNDERWAY MANASSAS DRIVE CULVERT
REPLACEMENT REVENUE SHARING PROJECT
PROJECT P-240
OWNER: Elizabeth Underwood
143 Missimer Court
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $18,000
TAX MAP: #61.19-10-25
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-241
OWNER: Gilbert Banton
2331 Coachman Drive
DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,000
TAX MAP: #39.12-1-27
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-242
OWNER: Dean Thompson
2730 Tulip Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE OUTFALL OF STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP: #61.11-1-47-5
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-243
OWNER: Craig and Kathy Dickerson
2817 Emissary Drive
DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #36.20-4-22
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-244
OWNER: Robert Lindsey
6744 Mallard Lake Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #96.03-3-10
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-245
OWNER: Lee Hall
3412 Poplar Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN
CONJUNCTIONWITH VDOT IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $8,000
TAX MAP: #77.14-6-46
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-246
OWNER: Todd Ranio
820 Harmon Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #38.08-5-6
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-247
OWNER: Barbara Hansel
4515 Hammond Lane
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $50,000
TAX MAP: #77.17-2.20 and 21
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: DESIGN COMPLETE - CONSTRUCTION IS EXPECTED TO
BEGIN IN SEPTEMBER
PROJECT P-247
OWNER: Paul Diagle
4566 Girard Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPLACED EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER IN
CONJUNCTIONWITH VDOT IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #77.17-2-11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-248
OWNER: Kenneth Paitsel
2639 Stanford Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP: #44.04-3-5
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-248
OWNER: R. W. Minter
2659 Standford Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP: #44.04-3-8
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-249
OWNER: Charles and Dianna Dietrich
5533 Halcun Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $30,000
TAX MAP: #38.07-5-17
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: COMPLETED
PROJECT P-250
OWNER: R. D. Peters
7519 Milk-A-Way Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM. COUNTY
ATTORNEY TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OF EXISTING
DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY.
ESTIMATED COST: $1,500 - $50,000
TAX MAP: #27.10-8-1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS: REMOVED FROM L1STICOUNTY NOT RESPONSIBLE
PROJECT P-251
OWNER: Shirley Woodson
2837 Crown Circle
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT CHANNEL - PROJECT DEPENDS ON
DONATIONS OF DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP: #44.03-2-30
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-252
OWNER: Anne Wealti
1311 Deer Run Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #61.04-2-53
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-253
OWNER: Linda D. Stover Barker
4435 Wyndale Avenue
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL AND STORM SEWER
SYSTEM IN CONJUNCTION WITH VDOT IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
TAX MAP: #76.08-6-44
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-254
OWNER: Francis Brookman
2719 Beaver Brook Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #44.04-4.11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-255
OWNER: Dennis Guthrie
4962 Bower Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $4,500
TAX MAP: #76.07-3-25
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETED
PROJECT P-256
OWNER: Mrs. Howard
5701 Pine Acres Lane
DESCRIPTION: REMOVE SILT FROM CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,500
TAX MAP: #86.16-2-29
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-257
OWNER: Virginia Johnson
5330 Chaparral Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP: #87.06-2-2 and 3
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: REMOVED FROM L1STIDEVELOPER CORRECTED
PROBLEM
PROJECT P-258
OWNER: Norman Ronk
3317 Carner Lane
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #36.08-1-1
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-259
OWNER: Janet Walker
5466 Yale Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $4,000
TAX MAP: # 64.02-2-25
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-260
NAME Lynn Johnson
4490 Brentwood Court
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #86.08-7-24
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-261
Tim Kennedy
5546 Ambassador Drive
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$20,000
#36.20-4-32
CATAWBA
Richard Taylor
5554 Ambassador Drive
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$10,000
#36.20-4-32
CATAWBA
PENDING
P-262
Jason Beach
1446 Lori Drive
CONSTRUCT STABLE CHANNEL
$18,000
#79.03-2-28
VINTON
PENDING
P-263
Michael Whiteside
6116 Steeplechase Drive
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER DEVELOPER TO
PARTICIPATE
$10,500
#86.01-2-36 and 37
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
PROJECT P-264
OWNER: Robert Agee
5361 Cave Spring Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL SLOPE
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #76.19-1-20
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-265
OWNER: James E. Moneyhun
3007 Tree Top Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP: #87.09-2-40
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: PENDING
PROJECT P-266
OWNER: Hans-Andreas and Stowasser
126 Orlando Avenue
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST $3,000
TAX MAP: #38.11-3-56
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS
STATUS PENDING
PROJECT P-267
OWNER: Ms. Romanus
4206 Kings Chase Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP: #97.08-02-02
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-268
OWNER: Paul Shumaker
1541 Mountain Heights
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $3,500
TAX MAP #35.04-01-17
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-269
OWNER: Richard Rader
3582 Colony Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,000
TAX MAP: #77.19-02-19
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-270
OWNER: Ronald Callahan
5138 Springlawn Avenue
DESCRIPTION: EVALUATE EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM
FORPOSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY OF PROJECT
ESTIMATED COST: ENGINEERING - $2,500
CONSTRUCTION - $25,000
TAX MAP: #86.12-01-40
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
STATUS: ENGINEERING COMPLETEIMEETING WITH PROPERTY
OWNERS
PROJECT P-271
OWNER: Sara Cole and Kathryn Davis
1529 Dalmation Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT STABILE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP: #36.03-1-30
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT P-272
OWNER: Nora Weikel
5191 Wipledale Avenue
DESCRIPTION: REGRADE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROVIDING AN
OVERFLOW CHANNEL FOR STORMS GREATER THAN
100 YR.
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP: #37.13-01-14
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
STATUS: COMPLETE
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
OWNER:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
OWNER:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-273
Eugene & Barbara Caton
3404 Greenc1iffRoad
REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$55,000
#77.10-03-18
Edward & Elizabeth Siler
3409 Ashmead Drive
#77.10-03-25
CAVE SPRING
COMPLETE
P-274
Wayne & Audrey Simpson
4615 Vest Drive
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL & STORM SEWER
$30,000
#77.17 -04-06
CAVE SPRING
PENDING
P-275
Barbara S. Roop
3424 Bunker Hill Dr.
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$25,000
#77.10-06-36
James & Catherine Paul
3426 Bunker Hill Dr.
#77.10-06-37
CAVE SPRING
PRELIMINRY ENGINEERING COMPLETE/SURVEY PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
OWNER:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-276
Michael & Gloria Jennings
5263 Cave Spring Lane
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL/INSTALL ADDITIONAL
INLET
$60,000
#76.19-01-30
WINDSOR HILLS
ENGINEERING COMPLETE - CONSTRUCTION PENDING
P-277
William & Rita Brinner
4845 Keagy Road
STABILIZE EXISTING OUTFALL OF STORM SEWER SYSTEM
(WILL NEED DRAINAGE EASEMENT)
$3,000
#67.18-02-09
Roy & Mary Gwyn
4843 Keagy Road
#67.18-02-10
WINDSOR HILLS
COMPLETE
P-278
William & Heather A. Harris
6210 Buckland Mill Rd.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$25,000
#18.17-04-32
HOLLINS
ENGINEERING COMPLETE - CONSTRUCTION AUGUST
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-279
Daniel A. LaPrade
3041 Merino Drive
EVALUATE EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$30,000
#76.03-01-07
WINDSOR HILLS
ENGINEERING COMPLETE/CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER
P-280
Bobby & Shirley 1. Cooper
637 Landfair Drive
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$35,000
#61.19-04-11
VINTON
PENDING
P-281
Larry & Tracy Western
3927 Meadowlark Road
REMOVE BERM AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
$4,000
#87.17-01-02
CAVE SPRING
PENING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-282
Leslie H. Stockton
7320 Crosstimbers Trail
REPLACE INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$18,000
#26.20-02-58
HOLLINS
COMPLETE
P-283
Charles & Peggy Aldridge
33 10 Locust Grove Lane
ESTABLISH SWALE
$5,000
55.10-01-07
CATAWBA
PENDING
P-284
Leonard & Caryl Hatch
2739 Tanglewood Dr.
CONSTRUCT STABLE CHANNEL
$40,000
#87.14-04-13
CAVE SPRING
PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-285
Cindi West
5948 Merriman Road
REGRADE REAR PROPERTY AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE
OUTF ALL CHANNEL TO MERRIMAN ROAD
$4,000
#87.17-04-04
CAVE SPRING
PENDING
P-286
Robert & Ann Draper
3001 Hillandale Avenue
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$6,000
#68.18-02-18
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
P-287
Theodore Sutton
2285 Donagale Drive
PROVIDE ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$8,000
#39.12-02-73
HOLLINS
PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-288
Jill Trent
5367 Cave Spring Lane
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$20,000
#76.19-01-19
WINDSOR HILLS
COMPLETE
P-289
David & Joan Thomas
4015 Drake Circle
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$3,500
#26.08-01-22
HOLLINS
PENDING
P-290
Helen Beam
4922 Balsam Drive
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$10,000
#87.05-04-26
CAVE SPRING
PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-291
Haven & Nancy Shuck
5405 Canter Drive
REP AIR EXISTING PAVED FLUME
$10,000
#86.07-03-10
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
P-292
Robert & Patricia Martin
2737 Tully Drive
REPLACE INADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$20,000
#36.20-01-03
CATAWBA
PENDING
P-293
Richard & Paula Gross
6465 Fairway View Trail
REP AIR EXISTING PAVED FLUME
$10,000
#66.04-01-35
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-294
William & Mary King
1912 Bridle Lane
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$20,000
#76.06-05-24
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
P-295
Michael & Kathleen Perdue
4805 Huntridge Rd.
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$25,000
#40.14-01-09
HOLLINS
PENDING
P-296
Mark & Deborah Long
6512 Fairway Estates Dr.
STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
$15,000
#66.04-01-08.03
WINDSOR HILLS
COMPLETE
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-297
Christopher & Cheryl Shupe
6625 Old Farm Road
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
$4500
#76.03-06-12
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
EXHIBIT "B"
NEW PROJECTS
P-298 - P-322
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-298
Duane Smith
2949 Bradshaw Rd.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$10,000
25.01-01-86
CATAWBA
P-299
T. 1. Rothmeier
6347 Crowell Gap Rd.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$20,000
107.00-02-17.00
CAVE SPRING
P-300
Jose Gayo
5702 Pine Acres Ln.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$12,000
86.16-02-13.0
CAVE SPRING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-301
Tyler Moore
4919 Fawn Dell Road
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$28,000
88.13-03-23.0
CAVE SPRING
P-302
Wayne Lineberry
3730 Ellen Dr.
CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER SYSTEM
$15,000-$20,000 (Engineering)
$100,000-$125,000 (Construction
55.10-04-03
CATAWBA
P-303
Randolph Midkiff
2725 Beaver Brook Rd.
REMOVE ROCK AND SILT FROM OUTFALL CHANNEL
$5,000
44.04-04-10
CATAWBA
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-304
Kim Castner
5815 Crumpacker Dr.
ESTABLISH NON-ERODABLE CHANNEL
$15,000
40.05-07-09
HOLLINS
P-305
Rita Cummins
3502 Forester Rd.
DESIGN OVERALL STORM SEWER PLAN
REVENUE SHARING CONSTRUCTION
$10,000 (Engineering only)
77.10-02-37
CAVE SPRING
P-306
Joe Sgroi
6370 Christie Ln.
REPLACE INLET AND CULVERT
$8,000
76.03-04-66
WINDSOR HILLS
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-307
Dolores Tamulonis
264 Spring Grove Dr.
RE-ESTABLISH OUTFALL CHANNEL
$5,000
61.11-01-61
VINTON
P-308
RICHARD MOORE
1701 Carleton Dr.
ESTABLISH OUTFALL CHANNEL
$10,000
35.04-04-12
CATAWBA
P-309
JEAN THOMPSON
5032 Cherokee Hills Dr.
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER
$50,000
54.04-04-51
CATAWBA
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-310
John Forrester
5571 Ambassador Dr.
RE-ESTABLISH OUTFALL CHANNEL
$10,000
36.19-01-06
CATAWBA
P-311
John Donahue
3838 Buck Mountain Rd.
REPLACE CULVERT
$5,000
88.03-02-57
CAVE SPRING
P-312
Brookfield, Section III
INSTALL ADEQUATE STORM SEWER
AND CONSTRUCT CHANNEL
$20,000 (DEVELOPER PAID $10,000)
79.03-08-11
VINTON
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-313
Lowell R. Wine
5363 Cloverdale Rd.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$9,000
BOTETOURT COUNTY
HOLLINS
P-314
Keith Oliver
1521 Beechwood Dr.
INSTALL CULVERT/CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$5,000
71.06-03 -02
VINTON
P-315
Thomas Underwood
2370 West Riverside Dr.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$5,000
55.04-01-09
CATAWBA
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-316
Bill Tittle
4337 Shelton Dr.
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
$5, 000 (Engineering/Survey)
$40,000 (Construction)
76.12-04-06
WINDSOR HILLS
P-317
Irene Lois Mae Lark
3173 Huffman Ln.
PROVIDE ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$5,000
80.01-02-12
VINTON
P-318
Mark Harri s
4566 Whipplewood Ct.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE SW ALE
$8,000
97.07-02-22
CAVE SPRING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-319
Kay Ellen Fielder
1901 Queensmill Road
REPLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER
$75,000
56.01-01-12
CATAWBA
P-320
Dwayne 1. & Shirley Kay Westermann
5564 Cynthia Drive, SW
STABLIZE CHANNEL
$15,000
76.19-04-09
WINDSOR HILLS
PENDING
P-321
Michael L. & Carey A. Winberry
5203 Chukar Drive
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$5,000
87.08-02-20
CAVE SPRING
PENDING
PROJECT
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
ESTIMATED COST:
TAX MAP:
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT:
STATUS:
P-322
Terry R. & Angela Cherie Wright
4542 Yellow Mountain Rd.
CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
$8,000
89.01-05-32
VINTON
PENDING
ACTION NO.
EI--3
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22,2006
Requests for public hearings and first reading for rezoning
ordinances - consent agenda
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
Philip Thompson
Deputy Director of Planning
Elmer C. Hodge G( f
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in
the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing
and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these
ordinances is scheduled for September 26. 2006.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1. The petition of Wayne Fralin to obtain a special use permit for the construction of a
mini-warehouse facility on 14.76 acres located at 5627 Williamson Road, Hollins
Magisterial District.
2. The petition of Qwiz Construction and Investments, LLC to rezone 8.829 acres from R-
1, Low Density Residential, to PRD, Planned Residential Development, with a maximum
density of 1.13 houses per acre located at 5815 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
3. The petition of R. Fralin Development Corporation to rezone 1.26 acres from R-1, Low
Density Residential, to C-1, Office, in order to construct two general office buildings
located at 2404 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office.
1
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the
purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for September 26. 2006.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1-3, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where requIred by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
2
~2-0(Q()\ <2 3 1
F - \
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Onl
Date received:
-, 1'2\ I 0~
Received by:
11..U)
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Applica~ion fee:
# 4-D
PCfBrlI,. date;
Placards issued:
Case Number D (). -
ALLAPPIJCANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
D Rezoning )(Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal
Applicants name/address w/zip
/' Wayne Fr<llin
4'08 Wendover Road
Daleville VA. 24083
Phone:
Work:
Cel! #:
Fax No.:
o Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review C .f'j-n\ c;\ :
777-1750 - ~::..'^- v./cl vfl.vj"
3"1,--0(0 lC;
L III \lJ I r~
777-1753
Owner's name/address w/zip
Wayne F'J:alin
408 Wendover Road
Phone #: 777-1750
Work:
Fax No. #: 777-17S3
Property Location
5627 Williamson Road
Roanoke, VA..
Tax Map No.:
Magisterial District Hollins
Community Planning area:
Existing Zoning: C-2
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 14 7f,
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
, ' ,
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMPfLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPIJCANTS (R/SIWICP) ,
Proposed Zoning: C-2
Proposed Land Use: Self stora e
<S?s the parcel meet the minimwn lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE [S REQUIRED FIRST.
oes tbe parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type?@ No
IF NO, A V ARlANCE [S REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No
VAillANCE, W AIYER.4ND ADMINlSTRATIVF.,APPEALAi"j>LlCANrs (VIW/AA)
VarianceiWaiver of Section(s)
ofthe Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLlCA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RlSfWICP V/AA RlS/W/CP V/AA RlS/W/CP V/AA
~ Consultation ~ g 1/2" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee
0./" Application -/ Metes and bO\lJlds description Proffers, jf applicable
v" Justification yo- Water and sewer application v Adjoining property owners
[hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the o~er' agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent
of the owner. ' tt . y-1_/,-
.; i~ 7rP-VL"-" Owner's Signature
2
," '-' -. , . ...
roSTIFICA nON :tOR REWNING. SPECIAL USEp'E)rf\1IT W AJVER OR COMP PJ;.AN (15.2-2232) Ri!:VlEW
REQUESTS
" . . . :.
Applicant
Dr. Wayne Fralin
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use pennit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
detennine the need and justification for the change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The mini-warehouse will be located in an area adjacent to Williamson Road,
Arterial STreet System, and Florist Road. The facility will be screened
fran surrounding neightorhoods by the required buffer zone and landscaping.
The project will be low profile, clean with very little noise.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
The property is designated Core by the 2005 Future land Use Map. This project
fits within the land use determinations of the Core designation: Areas of
existing and future corrmercial uses, serviced by an Arterial Street System
and in close proximity to populated areas.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including waterfsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
The property will be utilized for the storage of personal property, boats,
trailers and recreational vehicles. Since there will not be pennanent
housing on site, there will be minimal impact on puhlic utilities, roads,
schools and parks/recreational facilities. The proposed structures will
be constructed of metal and concrete and therefore, should not have any negative
impact on fire/rescue ser"ices.
3
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICA nON ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Pennit petition if new or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. [f it is the opinion of the majority of the
Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Pennit petition if the County
Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation
requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in
making a land use decision (Note: a list oj potential land uses and situations that would
necessitatejUrther study is provided as part oJthis application package).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written conunents
and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
0;.e.~ ...:3;; Lt4J
t?/~ ~
Peti ne? S, Ignature
7/Jijri>.
Date
I CONCkPTPLAN CrmCKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shaIl graphicaIly depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance ofa building permit.
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
ofthe request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
foIlowing are considered minimum:
ALL APPLICANTS
V"". a. Applicant name and name of development
.......... b. Date, scale and north arrow
Nfl.. c.
v"" d.
7'
e.
/f.
~ All property lines and easements
h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
.,~>... ~
t,..-
1.
/"'.
I..... J.
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc.
The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
,,"'~
..,."
k.
~
v'
---:-",...,J.
~ m.
n.
/0.
Existing utilities (water, sewer, stonn drains) and connections at the site
Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
~ q.
If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule
I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete.
~ /~
Signature of apPlican~
~j&,
Date
6
Western Virginia Water Authority
Water/Sewer Availability Application
Date: 07/1R(ZrP0
Applicant: W/\'{Nf:: f12AU N
Mailing Address: 4f)p) \t~E:N\7D\J~ RO,b.J7
_~\i\ \..Lt;: \JA. .z4Q8?7
/
Phone: 111- \,00
Cell:
Fax: 1/'- \-,~~
Property Address: 7(P~{ 'WlLLi N!1~tJ RaP
City or Cou nty: lZOb:N{) Kg.
Tax Map Number(s): ()~8. 10 -01" rz.:S. tJQ- (){X;O
Development (Subdivision) Name: c?bfe pL.k:,t:; ~
Single Residential, Duplex, Multi-Residential, Subdivision, or
Commercial Facility? ~~If.:>.l-
Water Meter Size Requested:
Sewer lateral Size Requested:
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING FOR
NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-RESIDENTIAL SERVICES
Domestic Flow Required? ** GPM
.... (Attach completed "Sizing Water Service Lines and Meters" Form AND "Non-Residential Sanitary Sewer
Checklist", blank forms available on website under "Engineers" section)
Is Building to be Sprinkled? YES / NO
Minimum Fire Flow Required?
GPM
Return to: Jamie Morris, Engineering Coordinator, Phone: 540-853-1588
Via Mail- 601 South Jefferson Street, Suite 300 Roanoke, VA 24011
Fax: 540-853-1017
E-mail: Jamie.morris~westernvawater.orq
Website: westernvawater.org
Rev. 1/06/06
YO,..= _~.pU"'"
..=e
,~ O~_..,D"'iJ
;~j;Ij ~ ~ ~
~,i~WW
._ W.&J::,l.... ~_--=::r.I
VINJ9'd1^ '3>lONVO'd
N'v'ld 311S A'dVNIV'l1l3'dd
SllNn 391;f'd01S
NIWH::I .9 3NAVM
N\fld 311S A<l'tNII'l1l3lJd
SllNn 3D'fl101S
/IIOlJ.nIOSJC
....
~;:I;;~~;~I=~U.~
""""":O.:.d...._I._
C'lO"~
:~~~~_::.::.~~~
D. 0
" \
0:
J
\ -,
~
" ~w
o U
VI
u
I
a..
.0:
"~ r3
~
.~
'"
"
~
'-
0<
:1i~
0<
co< ~w
'" "':;;
z ~~ ~~~
=> ~" ~~~
~ ~~
Z~ :tei ~
~z
uw ~;~
~ "u
~"
0....
, ~.. ~~g*
! ~ '" "w
~ ~ <"
,;-'" ..~ o;;lorw
~" ,," ~
o~
":.>l ~ uo ~~~~~
,,~ ~u
~" :: c~
~c
15~ :>~ ;~;~~
~c " ~~
~~ :>~ ~~~;i~
~ ~je
"'.. ~u ~u~~!
:>< <.::1:"1('1::
<< "
~ ~
" "
"'-~ ~
tI't::lwD
~7G2
.......~~:n
5;<.::(~
..,a..~~
~:~~
uw '"
~~ " ~~.
~~ => c~
"'''' ~~~~~ z-
"I
~~ '6==38 ~~i
z~
t5\l( III :;;~l$5~ ".~
~w:>
8 8S~~~ !!~:x'
:'$ ~~;~~et:J ~3~
=>
:> ~~.:.:
!? ~;-5~~<<~ ~~~
" ei~~~~~~
~ o O~U <~ ::;j!!i!!
~ tl:.~~!;~~ :~~
.. ~eEti$:!~~ 5La1~
U)_o.lI..I~ ~~~
;
.
w ~';l ~~
" ~~~~
~ " -i ~,
~ ~ !"C~ _ZIClQ ~g
~z~<~~ >-O)-W ~f
ti :i! >~"' ~-,~f~ ~~
~ ~fg~~ ~ ;~~~~ ~.
'" ffiwW 00
~ I~~~:: ~~~;~ :2Ji
D;I'...o~b ~~S~~ ~in
~ou<
Fralin
Tax
C2
C2
Number: 038.
District: Hollins
39
Area: 14.76 Acres
July 24, 2006 Scale: 1 H
~-O(zO\g3A
F -Q
CQunt)', of R{}';mok~
Couln::ll.mHy Dev(>tvpln€'ul
Planuing: & Zi)uwg
f 1Jt' Stuff V:$~ On-Iv
;5:?04B{:ma;q. Dfi\'~
P 0 B..:;::, 29SDD
RO~ln('jke, '\lA 24018-0798
(SAD:) 771,<2068 F.>\.,X (540) 776-7155
D~~:.: ~~~li:~'lid;
2;L~ loCQ
A~E::''I:'i,~~ ~h:
R(I~~i"'ild I>v:
:t>\-\ ..
pt:,'BZ.;>. ,2"~::l:
N
Pbc;,s6 k:~~d'
~~
Ci'J:ed: tJp-e o:f.ap:ptk~ti(;n fi1d ({he~k .111 tbat apply)
XR~2~lUilt: D Spe-c'bl V~e D Vul~H\c~ Q iVa:in~r 0 Admiuhh'",~ivt' Apt~~<'ll n ('<)mp Pl:m. ;:J~,~"11J1J Rt"Ttew
}%,pplit.ml% Jlnl:tt>.;id<tr~n. "\.'."z.i?
Qwiz Construction and Investments, LLC
6083 Wertz Orchard Road
Roanoke VA 24018
P1l:\"tl~:
-.;:~' <,}":1::
C!'ll #:
f.~:i }(:t;~:
(540) 353-5344
Ownt:r':;. u.:!m;:.:tltkh~i:. w':;ri~.
PhO:fl.tc;/-:
(540) 989-7988
(540) 353-5344
Qwiz Construction and Investments, LLC
6083 Wertz Orchard Road
Roanoke VA 24018
Pr\;pe~1y LCCllUCl;I.
5815 Bent Mountain Road
ROllnokf'. V A 1.401 R
vi c.t1:~
F~x N~. #::
-.Ji40) 989-7988
},f>'lgt"iV:riai Di;;lrid:
Windsor Hills
CCm!l."~~mi~: Pbrlliir;g ,'l;f1::-,,: Cave Spring!Windsor Hills
'f a~ :~~~lp l{:,::.~:
96.01-4-1
E1;dbS!" Zm~ln~:
....: .....
R-l
",' ~ '1"'" 8.829 Acres
~""'''e "".J: ,,",j;!",~, N'" :"..c ..~,.
. oIo..l.. '!to,. r"~'-" _ .~..'~.J...;.- l_t...-...._
E.xi,~.cii1g l$t~$ t1-.:;er:
Single Family ResidentiaJ
.... _.... '_. _. d_ ..___ _._ ____. _____ _, __ _, . ____.__ ___ ______ ,____ __ _._, .,____ ____ _,_,.-"_.,____". .__......___. _ __O' _ '.'_ '_.'_ _ _ _.', _ .'.____ _.____..,_ __,._ __ _ _. _.
ti-r:<Zh(\,t",i{,,~..,:t',b,i::i!fj-l"'''''''i~6"t':6:t-t;::~ifr>'' fV~Hi.t:n....:\ir","'A.Vd~Y$ ~'~<1' ~{ :i.i {;'& ~i'l'r.ll'" ,:1 &1-<.f]"):'3.~ ,,"r:'" t"'~'Si",'fe:'i~':~''':.
J~:f'-.,~:.-Y~' .:':~-!- ~ :_3;~ ~~~~:r~~\~::~:,>~., ~:":-:~::~:"}~(~::?Ff~,-{~~1.~..~<?\.. ,:.:-~~::$.:,t:F'f~~. ';:7 :::~f:: ~:~f~:':-~::~:.)~~~?~~ \A->~::~:~:7 -:;;:~_~:"~flJ~~~: ~:.~: ~~:' : <:> ,.-:..(~t:~':f::~". ~~::-~:~(~: ~(::~ :\~~?~-;,}'~>>~~~:f:l ". ..
Pt:op~~ed L(Juin.g:
P d L ....
" I"Gp.:>t.:e. ~Hl~! U'ie:
PRD
Sin".-Il'. F~milv Rl'."itff":ntilll
D(jes th" p3.::{'et !tlt'el t~I'e- m1uhnum. tvI- ..1<';;1.. -,;:;iJili, ~lld fi:~tit<'lge re'l1.i:feH~llt", ~fthe t'e,q~~e.",ed di~;t:1(.r: Nt A
~~.. er:; No IF NO~ Ai \~...4-Ri ~~CI: IS REQlIIRED F1R.ST.4C
DDe'i ,he pat'~.el ~t the .miillmum c:r:~.ri3: fGf the '::'eql.~.",d U!ie Typ-e-" Nc
If ;0;0, A ,'ARB-:\('E IS REQrIRI::D IlRST
Ifri'zt>"Ith;;,g r"~q\11.!:"~:. J;re. cor,!Eiion:~ b<:'~lg pwt,fu,-e4 with. th~:; j:"~qtt-e1f1' No
.... .~..t~~..t4N(?.ej'..n.;1it{ffi:.i:'it>:..al);~ltA'j;#1;1J~~;t!t'~"~tpifE:.J.~'.~'~.f1tl.fl:A8"i:~".(1,..}th';~~J..,".. '.":.'
\~j,ui!U~:c::.:\\~l9"i'.?e-I c::I Se;~:tf'~.$l(s)
j):f the- Itoanote ('onnty ZOtllti.;!' Od1rtM,~;;:~ in ,::d-~t' t.;.);
App~~'ll e.fZMill.g A6ID:i'it-i~ti:tt.<:>",~, clecid"a t'O
A pf>~a1 CifIllte'!pr:etat\c~i cf Se::ticr.(I;}:
App6'31-Jflnte~~'et.ltiou cfZ~~llg ~tap io
::;fthe R.t:'3n~.h C::,umr ZOfl1.'lg O:djllimc:~
j" till3ppti-::::!lion 1::[.mplt-re 7 Pfea:;~ cbeck if end.)~<:li APPUCA TIO l\" WlLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IFAXY OF THESE ITE\'L5
ARE MIS-SI:'\G OR I~COMPLETE,
R"",,:;P(;}' 'r'_-L.\. RiS'\'''C'P "/~-t.-\. R'S:W.<::P- Y:.\.o\
Em (:re:;\,}<ll-ti~ll Eai g: Vl"::; 1~" cODceftphll ~ App~;:<f;io.!l f~
.~.Fl:l1c!::io-l;; ~1t'e~ lln:!c bc.1'",f',& dt.~~riptit'll I-'rdfe.r=:, If Jl:Fb:~;,le
]u,nh-:::ari~<n 'I.,,'atennti.tilW"d" l':wlicatiou Adjoining Jm-"F.erty ,:!'I',lrB
! h....rtby c-ertify <mt I f,lll;t-iilier De cwn;;r .)nh~prop<:lty cr th.e owner':; <1.gem or C~1l.trecq:~m-,s.er alld. ~.ru ~:"tt;).:g wlfu thelll~""ie;]ge <,.;xl cm>e;:
~:m~.:lW3i~r. ~ ~ // __ .
~7r &:-- OWl:e-I'$ Slfllalm~
t11~ ~
'~<f-P1iti ':~;nt.
Qwiz Construction and Investments, LLC
Thz'Pli\illl1ng CClli..'11:f.:;:,k,fj ,;~'m tht$y 1"€:z8ufug, sp~~~l t;.':,~ ?e~mk ,~'ak~1' C,i" c':;~l.mudty pbtl (152-1131} ::~.,~i~~J: ~'~"iu-e:St:; to
~terrn.me' the t<.eed .:md j'i.l",-in:::::<';ti~'1I f\x the, <:h~Ulg:: in temH, ofpubh,:' l:.:e<,;ltb, "~E!y. lud 2Enf-11l.1 welf:uc _ Pl~ao;;e a1c;P;;...,,=<' th~,
f::lk~'",'i:a? qm~:;ri;Jm a;; ili,?r~ugMy ;'l,':; p~:;;;;ib1e._ V:.:e 2:dJrti'::'lla~ ,,'?ace if nece1,;'tI}'-
Plea,;;e: ~:':pl"i11l;(;w 11.~ re.:;ue:;t fhnh€:t$ the f'l1rp-m;e-;;: c.f the- ROlli",.~k.e C.~1~1~ Ot'd~cw~ .':f; i'..-ell a'.i the PlltF',;::e f<:ill.."la :let the
beginnil"lg.'~ the ~pplirable z,~itlg: di.&tt:tc! dM",dicati.>n.11l t!le Zori,lg Ord:i::mcc;t..
SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Plea:;e expl~itl au'.';r the pr'~jject .:"onfcJ:ms t:c, the gen~.1'al gi\ideEue!'i aad p.:.h"::1e<;: Wlltat11ed in the R<::i~l.K'.ke C;J1lJ';ty (:.~mmumty
Pl.al L
SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Plea~e de:;.:ti.b:e th~ imp~::t(:!;) of the 1-eque<it. on th~ p!;:;;?~" it,>,elf. the adj.:>iuiug p.t~rtie~, an.d ;.h~ :>,-In.t)llU(.mg Mea, ~:" ....'i?e1J ll.~.
ihe tm?1.1I:::i!; 00 public ..en-i~e.. r~nd fu:'iJitie:!i, inrlu.'lia1.,g, wati.'rhe'Ne.f, to;'ld'", ~<::hc('!k F::l'';:$:/reo'eai:t;:m. a-:ld 5xe and. r~scu~.
SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
'i"it
'.;' f
I . ....... ..... . ... ... . ... d. ......... . ....
........ ... ,"" ... ...,..". .... .,...., ',' ., ...,. ..'
-,' , ,..' ,- -. . - -., - ,. -. . - -, - , .., .' - . -.
. ,'. -. ' -, , -. - .,. -." ..,. '.' . ,. . -',.-
" , -.., .. -... -. '--,' - , ~' . "" .
. _. . . ...." _.' H"" . ,._ ___".. ' __, _ '.
" ,.,"'...,",... --- ".. -' ........
:5"S?S'~:~:,~~'~t1"f.:tj.rj:~:E:~;~.~;~~~',:
....
.i.,.'....-iirjii "'I'.-i,..I" 'j" I"
"."'"
"."1.
" '1.1
"'i' 1i"i" t'"
}j 6)tKeptl?bt ".fthe p~;~{s,;:;~4 ?t:.::-j~'.;t mr..wi t:.f: ~~t\bnuh~~ with t.hft <Ippli<".=1\I:ir;1'~.lh~ ~N1Ct'pt pIau 'i;h~U gfl\:phkl111y d~pkt. lIlt
kn<i n.'l~. dt;"l~f:t;,. de~.<?.t9pm.~.tlt:;<1: ~.',,"xiZ:H,;.e t'it~t 1.:l l:;;, %;'e:Nl~Hi't.td. Z\i1tht;::, t.h~: phn ~haH ~iddre'i,~ .m)' ~o.l"'~lti:~j !~::1il n>;;e ~n:
dedgu1 ;.:';W~1{.:r~,;;{:n~ frem 6>.!i~~tl",.~t Iii .~l;;;:h ,":'Os:.%: In':.'d >'i:U$ ~'<i'zt1iiu:?~, /'he 3ppli:caut m:,-;.' "0';;;-,ff"l1t .;:";,""U&ti.DUI; t" 1~ri., thil' f'ahlt"~
lX:~ .1-:t~ d~"d':;;l:<\l!:<'\Jl ~fthe pJ\)pe;lty ,tuo. hy ;~t< <i;;ing, (-;::m.'~t: tiny O'~tl,;i~ut:'if-"';: t1lat mty u>:-;*: b<:- ljlil1';.,.f,f:,,{;k by C>:;M~r~y r~nrj~h.r:r
r;;<~.d:J;t.~,w.,
TUt c,ialC~FI ph"!); ",h~u.M 1t,~cb,", ,::::t:ftt<;ed \~:hh th~ ,~ti!< 1~h~. ,~:f pl::-;t pl<ltl: ~1u,;1 t''; r!!:~it1-i1~<i rd~:r to d;;\!, i~m~'llJ.~~ "f ;1l><liiimg .l>Nmit.
Sit:: f'!Ml <<1.<1 r::,t~6.1irlg vel:mh pg:>(~~1tt~ re:m:ttt' c<>:n~H"'r,~e w:ith S~rite ~nJ Dc-,pwty 4~\'ekvruent r-e:g~t~A.11(.'lW <1.1'1';1. mrl} ~':t~:pil'(,:
t:bmg~s K~ ib~ ii..itial tmlcept.rl~m. "?:...hlle:,;;.limitit'$ c';>.1l;:titi~l~:'" are: V.1'Q fibt.d ami n:~.c~ptt.d ill: a n;t~\lling .C't' i.l:t\f<'.'i~4 <'tl a "P~:::: lOt.:!
tH.e pemli1: ()~. ~,,3::das1ce. th~ ::'J:;Jc~pt f'h<.:r,.l21::!'Y he ~i~~{ed :<:i ,~e~te:llt iX'mci>:ted by the: zc:1i:ll~ ddti,';r~~:l.;l Oth~f l:e<gubHcUli.
.k :;.~~~~y~ pl<<l:i i~. te11:d.r.~d vli~b .~tl r~"Z(:'t:bg,;. ('l?d~j 1t~;:e- fe,:mi~< ~#,.i<~e~:: :::.;;Jl~m~llitr plit;cJ {l5::-:n32;, l'~'ci~'w iIll:dv;~.l~r's:;~*
liPf'lk.l!tb3!~, The phil ~;h<)uld be p~:::~:<.~~d by a l;m:,t-e-~dc:llZll !'.lite y~~JXiet. T1t~ :level. d d~I:ti1 a1;.~y ,;;~:y, d-~;,;:ei:lsiti.g 011 1h~ t~.lh1fe
{It ti1~, ~e:~t)e~.t 11.~ C~;u:nt;{ ?Jl\1ltting. Dhici(j:l1 k;~ff m.ay e~empt ::.itlme of the i1e:m!i t.<{' liUggi'$! lll~ l-dditk'n of e~':h~ h~m,\ h~R till:
f~:sl~;:"~~d~1g: .a~t:~ ":;:"~~1;1~i.~~~-~i 1n~1L~I"!l'tut:
w .~ ""f'~' T" ""IS
~ ';' :....~;;~;t::~;:~t p'am~ ~ud Ham~ ~. f i'e::,,:t~';;;::me~.~t
X l)
X c:,
X <J
X- ~.
X- I'.
X $.,
X <-
Wo.
.x s~
X. ,-
.:=~
D~te,. ,,-crdie l:>ll<t ili>I'l.h .;<~:n::,~~'
l~~t:.t, ~~:te ~t1. ;;1....;-f:t:~- C{.-,~:~~~tlre "fe-tt' ~-s};:i d$.r~:~u::;i ~~:~1{~
Ij;:nltk.:u, -~~::;'1nt':i ,4 .,:~1~~<tn a~d R>:>o!<"Urke (\;'tll'l.ty ta>;: m.;\? mmi6:~I\'; <::f udj(;;JtiHg. p~',!~;:elt~~,>
Pirt:;~~,~l t.~-ril::;u~~, :m.",]) ~,~ ~)>:;\'~11(lqn'~, ~1;'ltl1P:l '.;\1~lefl;:(':IWi~'_:, fi('..wpb;it'i,. t\tt.
The ztmfu:g: t:1l(1 bi:ir.i w.;e -,'f-ilH ~;,Jj:rJ-;:(c:Ilt ~lr:V'::l'tie;,;
}.Jl t3{t;;p~r;:y Hnet ;l114 :!',tM:1'dl.NW;
An h:,<~141:ilg::::: e:d$tbg ~l):& pr,;:!:,o:;-ed. ai11 j;t:ll~~'I;;:i':-~l$, ilNf Ms::il. a::l.;t btiglt{,
L:;'(.o;titls, w~4~h$ ~;ud 1l1iUi.t'~ of t>.:U t:..h:in;g. ~;f p1atte& ;!,tr~t':C:; :.:r cdltf l?tlb1io:: \'In(i~; witl1iu cr (ldj,tc~U1 t;:;< ',h~ o.e~i'~,Ji)P':~!lt
Di$~-:l;;k'm ~:n,1 k'NJbllt Isf aU (iJ:;i,;;'e"';'"Y$, pt:i'ktl'l$ $f."K~~ a.il~ k;:adiag '~r.~,<.::e'~
..td~i~t~~~~~{;'!} jiV1;';:l-'~j~.{{ft.);y:~: ~l"'$fJUs~~..:.;~~j1?~r REZt');\j-:y....::C~ i"1'~~d S~wExC.l~L [[SE ~PEft.:.l11T....4PPLJ(;...4).:-rS
X ~:,
--
X L
-
X lU.
X !~
X t:,..
X ?
-
X q.
E::tt~ti.n2' t<~i.H.1!"':'; (':"/il!<l'r, <:-e'i,~~~ !;101-md1~in~) .;md C::::i.'li,~(tf'':-,~1". M ::h~ ,ite
_~..t1Y .:h:i:;':ewn}'!<, ell~ralJ.'.:e$/e};,ih, c:a~j; t<f"e'lli~~,p ;>;~,J ~H<%~;;en
Tap:.;:p'lIpL? lB:lfi' in ~ :mi't~bk. J;.:;:a1:t ~m.d cc,nt;YJ.- i.at<:'fT;<l~i.
Apl,"'r~?"i:tl~~t~. !;tl~t 8.;;;d~~ <'lwcl ~it;!' di;lttt~l;;:~~ ttr 'h:2:~I'~~I:otiplh
l;:~~:t;jioo~ .~f~~.t.-,;\dJ~;~~JJ11ile~ ;1t}~~1~.:!t1J~~.i
;::'..a: ?l'<::itl!:n':d. C<.1tldi:ti.61l'.i l,t 11t~ d~tl al'd h;:>.,.> th>!;y zw~ tHldr'Z_~';.....6
If r.t~j:;;><:'t;~ to be l~b<~~t:,t l)k;~.">:l ~h;;:w yh~~-e (,.;hxt!.~t~
1 or.:et,:ify th,t:' aft ~ i-e.n1:~ H'(fnil"~d t~ 1..: .~be<:}JiH $.:~.(~,,,, Mf:: .: Q(~Jp l.:ie.
~~
. "l'll~'::t:e< ,...f ".''''''li'''''lt'
.:....;:::-: ~:v - -.I' '~t'.;....., .......l,"'..
Mi/r~~tyL
7/1v/o1o
lr,,~t~
COfnrnUflity' DBVBkmment
Planning t~ Zoning: [)ivision
NOTI('E TO ..-'\.PPLICANTS FOR REZONING. SUBDrVISI0N\V Al'lER.
. .
. .
PUBLIC STREET \VA1VEX, OR SPECIAL USE PER7\.UT PETITION
PLANNING CO},{\:fISSION ApPLICATION ACCEPTAl~CE PROCEDl3RE
The Roanoke C:OUHt}' Planning COl1llnis;~ion reserves the right to O)lltlllUe a Rezoning,
Subdi...,s>iC:<ll \Vaiver, Public: Street \Vaiver or Special Use P~nnit petition if new or additlo1l.:1.1
infOlmatiou is: pn~,ente..d at the pnhhc hearing. If it i~ the opiai:.)ll of the majo.rity i)f the
Planning Ccmmis5iioners prese,tlt at the scheduled publi<: heMin.g: t~t suffu:ie.ut time ~Nas not
(niail~ble for plalUllug st.aff aud/or au OU!;;;!& [delTal ageucy to adequately eVahl.l.te and
pravid.~ ".'l'itten comn1.euts and .s-t.,gge~tiam an the 11~\V (.11' additional informatiou pnDr to the
scheduled public hearing then the Phuming Counni%lon may vote to wntulUe: the- petiti..m.
Tbfii continuculce' 511.111 allow sufficirnt time: fOl' an aecesOiar)' revit"'.ving p<,dies to e.valuate
the new Qf additiornU information and provide 1v~ittell comments ac:::t suggestl011ti to he
indl.1de.d ill a 'written mernorandlUll by planning staff tD the Planning CommissiQtl. The
Pl.'Uming Cnmm:i5.)ion :shall com:nh \,,'ith pl,'l1Ullug staff to dete.nrune d a com.i:nuanc.e Hlll.Y be
'N>li.t<\11ted.
POTE\"11AL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC A;;.,{AL YSES A,,~D!OR TRAFFIC n.,1PACT Sl1..iDY
Th~ ROaliOke County Pl-um:iug Commission t"e,>erYe~ the right to <:I)ntim.~e a Rezoning.
Subdivl"lon \Vaive.:r, Public Streef Waiver, or Special U;e Permit petition if the County
Tram.porratiou Engineering },'1anager or staff fWIll the "\lirginia Department of Tr:an;;portarion
re-qn~sts M'llie. traffic:: analyses and/of a tmffic im1l3d :;Iudy th'-'t "','.iOuld be beneficial in
maki11g a laru.i me deci~inn (Note:' a list of potentia! land uses ,and simations t!w; ,<muM
'1:eC t?SJ itt1tf=~ ...furrh,(~r' s.ttl!~r is. p1~(j'..,'i(? #20 as PlZ1.-t ~f rh is i1P.vlit-:iJtiv~=; pacl:i.:"-ge)..
TIlls c(.'l11tinuallC~ shall allow sufficient rim.::- fN' an ll!:cessaJ:'Y revie.v:ring parties to ev.ahmte
the, required traffi(: aua1y,.,-,s and/or lJ.'affic impact "'f.Udy and to pmvi&:: ,vriHell eDmments
all&'or sugge~tiQn~ to the plamuug staff and the Plauning Couunis;;;ioll. If IT cOlltiUlk"lDC~ is
';va(mnt~d, the .applicant win he uotified of the: cOlltinUffi1C~ aud tbe ne',vly gche-duled public
he.ari~lg (bte.
Eff~di""e Df:.te: ApriJ 19\ 2G~})
Qwiz Construction and Investments, LLC
N'ame of Petition
~ -!eO-- fff~..~. ~6'Y2-
~ Pe-titiol1<:!''''S Si911~tul~
7-21-06
Date
6/U/J'MnfY}t QY{i/I
A Planned Residential Community
P~anning and Design Guidelines
July 20,2006
C\jCI
LLC
QWDZ CONSTRUCTHJIN &. ~NVE5TMENTS~ LLC
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal
2
Development Summary
3
Summer Hill Site Design Guidelines
4
Summer Hill Site Design Guidelines Summary Table
9
Summer Hill Architectural Details
10
Pledge of Proffered Conditions
11
Adjoining Property Owners
12
Metes and Bounds Property Description
13
Summer Hill Existing Conditions
PRD-1
Summer Hill Master Plan
PRD-2
Summer Hill Terrain Map
PRD-3
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
C~
LLC
Qw~z COi"<:!ISTIRUCT~ON &. ~fi'~VESTlf~ENTS9 LLC
July 21,2006
Planning & Zoning
Roanoke County Community Development
5204 Bernard Drive
Roanoke, VA 24018
RIE: SlUlmmer Ilim PRD Application:
1) Rezoning Application forms
2) Planning and Design Guidelines
3) Concept Plan Sheets (3) 24x36
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is a PRO application for tax parcel 96.01-4-1. If you have any questions or
need any additional information please contact Jacob Quesinberry at (540) 353-5344 or
email atqwlz@qcillc.com.
Thank you,
..
Jacob Quesinberry
Managing Member
Qwiz Construction & Investments, LLC
Enclosures
Dreams Engineered
qwiz@2qcillc.com
c;:Jw,z CON:9TRUGTIDN AND INVE9TMENT!:;, LLC
3
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
QW1Z Construction and Investments, LLC (Developer), respectfully requests a
rezoning of tax parcel 96.01-4-1 from R-1 to Planned Residential Development District
(PRD). The proposed development will consist of 10 single-family residential homes.
The property, consisting of 8.829-acres, currently has one residence that is served by
private well and septic. The existing home is a brick and vinyl colonial style home that
features approximately 4,200 square feet of living space. The property is mostly
wooded. The proposed development seeks to preserve as much of the wooded
environment as possible by dedicating a minimum of 35% of the site as open space or
conservation/recreation easements. The Property is currently zoned R-1. The "R-1, low
density residential district is established for areas of the county... with existing low-
middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three
(3) units per acre...". The proposed Summer Hill subdivision has a maximum density of
1.33 units per acre.
Each home will be served by public water, private septic and a private road. The
proposed private road will consist of a 20-foot wide asphalt surface conforming to the
VDOT commercial entrance requirements at the connection with Bent Mountain Road.
Individual driveways for individual residencies will connect to the private road. The
private road will utilize as much of the existing driveway alignment as possible to reduce
the amount of land disturbance.
The private road will maintain the existing access point to Bent Mountain Road.
The entrance will be upgraded to provide for longer sight distances and increased
turning radii. The shared access, as recommended by Roanoke County Transportation,
prevents the addition of more vehicular conflict points with Bent Mountain Road and
Ran Lynn Drive. The steep terrain would require a great deal of earthwork to construct a
public road within the property. Thus the proposed private road deviates from public
road standards with limitations in an effort to preserve as much of the landscape as
possible. Construction of the private road will allow for shorter individual driveways thus
minimizing the amount of land disturbance for roads and driveways. The private road
would minimize the amount of earthwork and tree removal thereby protecting the buffer
and scene-scape with the adjoining properties.
The improved roadway would allow for better access for fire and rescue
emergencies than is currently available to the existing structure. Extension of the of the
public water service to this property would allow for the installation of fire hydrants which
are currently not in the vicinity of the subject property.
The Developer proposes to execute a private road maintenance agreement and
establish a private homeowners association for this community. The private
homeowners association (HOA) will maintain a capital reserve fund for maintenance of
all common amenities, common open space, conservationlrecreation areas and private
roads. Funding will be provided via dues levied to the individual homeowners of the
proposed Summer Hill subdivision.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
~WIZ CCNSTf'IUCTION ANO h"-IVE:S;TMENTS, LLC
4
SUMMER HILL SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES
Site Design Guidelines and Intent
The following design guidelines are intended to be standards of development for
Summer Hill. These guidelines will set the tone and character for the community as well
as providing the means by which the community shall be designed. These guidelines
are not meant to be comprehensive or to cover all site specific-issues that may be
encountered in the design and development process.
Association
A Homeowners Association (HOA) will be formed to maintain all common open
space, conservation/recreation areas, private roads, and site amenities. All property
owners within the proposed Summer Hill subdivision will be members of the HOA and
will have the responsibility to pay dues to the HOA for the maintenance of these
facilities. The Homeowners Association shall maintain a capital reserve fund and may,
from time to time as necessary, levy assessments to pay for common improvements.
Preservation Areas
A minimum of 35% of the site will be preserved as open space and
conservation/recreation areas. A minimum of 25% of the site will be dedicated common
open space. If less than 35% of the site is dedicated open space then the remainder of
the preserved area will be dedicated conservationlrecreation easements in order to
meet or exceed the 35% minimum requirement All open space and
conservation/recreation easements will be for the benefit and use of the community
residents. The main conservation areas will include the stream at the north corner of the
property, the steepest slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas of the property.
Preservation areas will encompass all flood plain areas in an effort to reduce
environmental impact and risk to future improvements. A portion of the area between
Ran Lynn Drive and Bent Mountain Road and the proposed lots will be preserved as a
natural buffer between the homes and the existing roads. The buffer area along these
roads will be preserved as part of the dedicated open space. No road or residence will
be allowed within the open space or conservation/recreation easements.
Site amenities and utilities will be allowed in the open space and
conservationlrecreation easements. Amenities that will be allowed include: pedestrian
trails, playgrounds, picnic areas, and gazebos. All amenities and dedicated open space
within the community will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association.
Development Areas
The primary areas used for construction will be along the higher elevations of the
property. The placement of the homes will allow for the preservation of the more
sensitive areas of the property as well to provide a natural buffer around the existing
public streets.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
Qw,,,, CCN..TRUCTICN AND INVE:"TMENT9. LLC::: 5
Buffer Yards
A 50-foot natural buffer shall be maintained along a majority of Bent Mountain
Road and Ran Lynn Drive. Exceptions will be provided for the private road to access
Bent Mountain Road and infrastructure as necessary. A 3D-foot natural buffer shall be
maintained along all adjacent property lines. Wherever a house, driveway, accessory
structure, or drainfield on the property is located 30-feet or closer to an adjacent
property line and a natural 3D-foot buffer is not maintained two rows of evergreen trees
shall be planted as an additional buffer. In no case shall there be a natural buffer
between houses, driveways, accessory structures, or drainfields on the Property and an
adjacent property line of less than 15-feet. Any and all evergreen trees planted as buffer
landscaping shall be a minimum of 6-feet tall at the time of installation.
Roads
The road within Summer Hill will be private. The Homeowners Association will be
responsible for maintaining all roads. The roads within Summer Hill will be a minimum of
20-feet wide with 3-foot shoulders. The minimum pavement section will be 6-inches
base stone with 2.5-inches of an asphalt surface. The existing driveway surface may be
incorporated into the road provided there is a minimum asphalt thickness of 3-inches.
The minimum centerline radius will be 95-feet except at the entrance to Bent Mountain
Road. The minimum radius at the entrance shall be 25-feet.
The entrance at Bent Mountain Road shall conform to the VDOT commercial
entrance standards. The standard maximum road grade will be 16-percent with
exceptions. A maximum grade of up to 19-percent may be used provided that any grade
above 16-percent not exceed 400-feet in length. A turn-around or a cul-de-sac may be
provided at the end of the street The minimum cul-de-sac radius, if used, shall be 40-
feet. All 'T' type turn-arounds shall be sufficient to accommodate emergency vehicles
and school buses
The proposed private road will not be maintained by the Department of
Transportation or Roanoke County. The Developer acknowledges and will record that
the street will only be considered eligible for addition as an element of the secondary
system of state highways if it is constructed to the standards of the prevailing
subdivision street requirements or other applicable approved standard of the Virginia
Department of Transportation, utilizing funds other than those administered by the
Department of Transportation.
Guardrails
Guardrails shall be required along the private road where a downhill slope
greater than 25% is encountered within 20-feet of the centerline of the road. The
Developer and/or the Homeowners Association may elect to install additional guardrail
in areas deemed appropriate. Guardrail openings shall allow sufficient access to
residences. All guardrails shall be of a timber type construction.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWl2: CO.....9'TRUCTIDN AND I.....Vf;:SlTMENTS, LL.C 6
Retaining Walls
Retaining walls may be built as necessary to accommodate road, building and
driveway construction. Retaining walls may also be incorporated Into landscape
designs. All retaining walls must be approved by the Architectural Review Board prior to
construction.
Trails
The Homeowner's Association may elect to provide pedestrian trails within the
common open space as desired. The trail surface may be mulch, gravel, or wooden and
a minimum of 3-feet wide.
Landscaping
Landscaping will be provided at the entrance to the Property. As well, each home will be
professionally landscaped around foundation areas and yards.
Tree Preservation
The maximum allowable area to be cleared for any home site shall be 10,000 square-
feet. This allowance is exclusive of any required drainfield areas. Any additional clearing
in excess of the 10,000 square-foot maximum shall be approved by the Developer.
Lot Size
The minimum lot size shall be 0.35-acres. The minimum lot frontage shall be 50-
feet and 3D-feet along cul-de-sacs.
Minimum Buifding size
The minimum building size shall be 2,500 square-feet for the primary dwelling.
The building size requirement shall include all heated and cooled living space within the
structure regardless of level.
Maximum Building Height
The maximum building height will be 45-feet. The building height shall not include
basements that are partially exposed.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
~WIZ (:;ONSTF=l:UCTICN A.ND 'NVEgTMENT9, LLc- 7
Accessory Buildings
All accessory structures must be located behind the front plane of the primary
structure. The maximum height of accessory structures shall be 25-feet. Any and all
accessory structures must be approved by the Homeowner's Association and comply
with the Architectural Review Board's requirements.
Setbacks
The minimum front setback shall be 20-feet from any private road.
The minimum side setback shall be 5-feet from any common development lot.
The minimum rear setback shall be 1 D-feet from any common development lot.
The minimum setback from any adjoining property lines or from any public right
of way shall be 3D-feet.
The existing home shall be exempt from the front setback requirement. The
minimum setback for the existing home shall be 5-feet from any private road.
Density
No more than 10 homes will be built on the property including the existing home
as shown on the master plan. The maximum density for the development shall not
exceed 1.33 units per acre.
Lighting
Any and all street lighting shall be residential in scale and style. All street lighting
shall be post mounted lantern type and shall not exceed 12-feet in height. All street
lights shall not exceed 150 watts each.
All exterior lighting, whether street, driveway, walkway or exterior house lighting,
shall be top shielded to cast all light downward. All lighting on the exterior of homes and
accessory structures shall not exceed 100 watts per fixture.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWJZ CONSTRUCTION AND INVEBiMENT5I, LLC
8
Water/Sewer
Public water will be made available to the proposed lots via the 24-inch waterline
that runs along the north side of Ran Lynn Drive. The Western Virginia Water Authority
has provided the prelimInary availability analysis that has indicated that connection to
this service line is possible for the proposed development. The existing structure is
currently served by a private well. The existing well would be abandoned and the
existing home connected to the public water system as part of this development.
Public sewer is currently not readily accessible to this site. The nearest public
sewer service is more than 300 feet from the site and grades do not facilitate connection
to the existing service line. The proposed lots are sized to accommodate private septic
systems.
Utilities
All utilities shall be placed underground. Utilities may enter the property above
ground at a predetermined location where they will be placed underground and
distributed through the development. Utilities may cross common open space as may
be required. All heat pumps and other outdoor appurtenances shall be screened from
view of the roads or adjacent property owners via decorative wooden curtains or
sufficient landscaping. The Architectural Review Board shall approve any and all
proposed screening as well as the proposed location prior to installation.
Trash Collection
Trash collection will be individual can pick up and will be collected internally
within the development. There will be trash collection on or adjacent to Bent Mountain
Road.
Fire Protection
Fire hydrants would be installed along the private rO?l:d via an 8-inch public water
connection that would service the proposed development. The Western Virginia Water
Authority has provided the preliminary availability analysis that has indicated that
connection to this service line is possible for the proposed development. At present
there are no fire hydrants in the vicinity of the subject property.
The improved roadway would allow for better access for fire and rescue
emergencies than is currently availabte to the existing structure.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QW1Z CONe.......RUG-rION AND INVESTMENTS, LLC 9
Summer Hill PRO
Summary Table of Site Design Guidelines
Maximum Development Density
Minimum Lot Area
Minimum Street Frontage
Setback Requirements (Common Development)
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
Adjacent Property Setback
Minimum Building Size
Maximum Building Height
Maximum Accessory Building Height
Minimum Common Open Space
Minimum Preserved Area
Buffers
Minimum Width Adjacent Public streets
Desirable Minimum Width Adjacent Property Lines
Minimum Width Adjacent Property Lines
Roads
Minimum Roadway Width
Minimum Shoulder WIdth
Maximum Desirable Grade
Maximum Grade for Lengths of 400-feet or Less
Minimum Centerline Radius
Minimum Entrance Radius
1.33 units per acre
15,246 SF (0.35 acres)
50 FT
20FT
5 FT
10 FT
30 FT
2,500 SF
45 FT
25 FT
25% of total site
35% of total site
50 FT
30 FT
15 FT
20 FT
3 FT
16%
19%
95 FT
25FT
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWIZ CONSTRUCTIDN AND INVESTMENTS, LLC 10
SUMMER Hill ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS
It is the developer's intent to develop this project and then offer lots for sale. The
following architectural guidelines will serve to guide the style of the homes built within
the community. Should the developer build speculative or custom homes on any of the
lots within the community they will be subject to these guidelines as well.
Architectural Review Board
An Architectural Review Board shall be established to review and approve any
and all land improvements on the lots to ensure improvements conform to the likeness
and design atmosphere Intended for the community. The Architectural Review Board
may also reject any improvements that would adversely affect the community design
and development style. Reviews shall include such items as structure style, house
plans, elevations, exterior colors, exterior materials, landscaping, etc.
Exterior Materials
All exterior siding materials shall be brick, stone, wood, synthetic wood or stucco.
A premium vinyl material by be used provided than it does not cover more than 50% of
the exterior of the primary structure. All roofing materials shall be architectural asphalt
shingles.
Accessory Structures
Any accessory structure proposed shall be reviewed and approved by the
Architectural Review Board. Accessory structures shall be constructed to match the
primary residence on each lot. Exterior materials of accessory structures will comply
with those required for other structures as listed
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWIZ C;ONSTRlJCTION AND INVESlTMENTSl. L.L.C 11
PLEDGE OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS
The owner/developer hereby proffers that the property, subject to rezoning
approval, will be developed with substantial compliance with the "Summer Hill- A
Planned Residential Community, Planning and Design Guidelines" prepared by Qwiz
Construction and Investments, LLC, dated July 20, 2006.
A private homeowners association (HOA) will be created that will maintain all
common open space within the community, all common use amenities, the private road
and a capital reserve fund for future improvements and maintenance.
Signed~~
/J1~~~/::1L
Date: '-r /zc/Of,1
Owner/Developer
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
(yWl.z. CONSTF;!UC-r-,ON AND I NVESTME:NT!!I, LLC 12
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
Tax Map Nos. 96.01-4-18, 96.01-3-1
Commonwealth of Virginia
Tax Map No. 96.01-4-17
D. J. Cooper
5885 Bent Mountain Road
Roanoke, Va. 24018
Tax Map No. 96.01-4-2
Russell A. & Terance R Grisso
5812 Ran Lynn Drive
Roanoke, Va. 24018
Tax Map Nos. 86.03-2-3, 86.03-2-9
Ran Lynn Farms, LLC
4742 Old Rocky Mount Rd.
Roanoke, Va. 24014
Tax Map No. 86.03-2-7
Charles E. & Kimberly White
5741 Ran Lynn Drive
Roanoke, Va. 24018
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWIZ CONSTRUCTION AND INVESTMENT"', LLC 13
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
Situated in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia:
Parcell: BEGINNING at a stake on the North bank of Back Creek near Willow
(Dogwood and Pine called for gone), Corner to Susannah Grisso 28.25 acre tract
and J.C. Croft; thence with the J.e. Croft and Riley 1. Fralin line, N. 28 degs. W.
28.0 ft. to a point on the Southerly side of U.S. Highway 221 (know locally as
Bent Mountain Road), said point being the "Actual Place of Beginning" of the
herein described parcel of land; thence leaving the above described Beginning
Point, N. 28 degs. W., crossing U.S. Highway 221 (50 ft. wide) and passing an
iron pipe in the old fence at 439 ft. I in all a total distance of 655 ft. to a stake,
corner to the 0.74 acre tract formerly conveyed out of Susannah Griso 28.25
acre tract; thence with the lines of the same, N. 78 degs. is' E. 285.5 ft. to a
stake; thence N. 16 degs. 50' W. 148 ft. to a point in County Road in line of Frank
H. Vest property; thence with the middle of the Road and lines of Frank H. Vest,
N. 71 degs. 15' E. 10ft. to a point; thence S. 75 degs. 45' E. 326.0 f1. to a point,
corner to NO.2 of Sigmon and Easter land; thence with the same S. 51 degs. E.
passing corner to NO.2 at 87.7 ft., in all 100.0 f1. to a point in the middle of road,
Corner to No.3 of Sigmon and Easter Land; thence with the middle of the Road
and with lines of Lot 3, S. 38 degs. E. 196.5 f1. to a point; thence S. 50 degs. 30'
E. 245.4 ft. to a stake in the Northerly right of way line of U. S. Highway Rt. No.
221; thence with the same, N. 58 degs. E. 41.5 ft. to a stake in branch; thence
with the branch crossing under the middle of a concrete bridge, S. 33 degs. 45'
E. 94.0 f1. to a stake at the mouth of the branch; thence up the North bank of
Back Creek, S. 63 degs. 30' W. 100,0 ft. to a stake; thence S. 61 degs. 15' W.,
350.0 ft. to a stake, at the Southeasterly corner of the 0.34 acre tract conveyed to
Gladys Hutton by P. A. Grisso and wife; thence with the East line of said 0.34
acre tract; N. 20 degs. W. 41.0 ft. to a Southerly side of U. S. Highway Rt. No.
221 (50 ft. wide, known locally as Bent Mountain Road); thence with the
Southerly side of said Road, S. 65 degs. W. 267.6 ft. to the "Actual Place of
Beginning", and containing 8.82 acres, more or less.
LESS AND EXCEPT 0.80 acre, more or less, shown on Sheet NO.9 & 10,
Project 620A, Route No. 205, Department of Highways plans for Rt. 205 (now
redesignated U. S. Rt. 221), conveyed by Susie M. Grisso to the Commonwealth
of Virginia by deed dated June 25, 1930, recorded in Deed Book 197, page 487.
LESS AND EXCEPT 0.05 acre, more or less, as shown on Sheet 3 of plans for
Route 688 Highway Project 0688-080-125-C-501, recorded in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in State Highway Plat Book 8,
page 1, taken by the Commonwealth of VirginIa by Certificate No. C9565, dated
April 28, 1965, recorded in Deed Book 770, page 75 and Order entered
December 3, 1979, recorded in Deed Book 907, page 398.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
QWIZ CONSTRueileN ANO iNVESTMENTS, LLC
14
PARCEL II: BEGINNING at a point in the middle of a public road called the J. H.
Grisso Road, said point being 121 feet S. 26 degs. E. of a White oak and Black
oak corner of said Susannah Grisso's land; thence running with the line of R T.
Fralin's land crossing a branch, S. 26 degs. E. 113 feet to a stake at 2; thence a
new line N. 78 degs. 15' E. 248.5 feet to a stake at 3; thance N. 16 degs. 50' W.
148 feet again crossing the branch to a point in the middle of the road at 4;
thence along the road, S. 70 degs. 00' W. 266 feet to the place of BEGINNING,
containing 0.74 acre according to survey and plat made by George L. Poage.
Both parcels being designated as Roanoke County Official Tax Map No. 096.01-
4-1.
Summer Hill
A Planned Residential Community
'=IT1 'SLN3WLS3^NI
aN'" NDI.I-::JnM.l-sNO~ ZIMC:]
m:ld - ,'IH ~311\11f11nS
dVVlI NI\fl::I};j3.1
E.J
cr
:;l
o
f-
1:;5
zO
=>0
OZ
U<{
wz
~o
0-
z~w
c5~~
cc....:::o
::;;:UJx
~i!~
,,-<{o-
<{OlL
f-U<{
<(-z
OIO
ccO-f=
=>~<
D~::;;:
>-oCC
Zn.O
00"-
Or:?:;
~
o
ZU~
O.....J~
-.....JO
f5 r-- ~
~Uu)~'7
:5 ::J r-- 2:: ;!:
~n::z~~
Qr--W:3-
~(f)~5~
oZr--<'"
gJO(/)~~
ffluwa::i
a:: >~
Nz~
S: - ~
a '"
0)
UJ
f-
o
Z
----
.--/
/----
--
\ . /. .o~,~-
.._- --- ~ -
i .'
1 I
\
'~.
I
I
...
~
o
....
I-
o
....
::?
~
o
...J
i;
I,
/,
/,'t,
J
t a
I B S
~ t .
(>')
o
a::
Q...
f-
D 0
<{ ir
~ t;;:;;
z 5Z
~~;t~
~.roc>",
:;l 0 UJ ~o
~~t;;r:~
~~B5~-
~z~8~
zc2~w~
OCl-ll<:
ozorO
uJo:[cc~
~ 00
~ 8((
- z
UJ ~
"j i
I
, ~
. .....-,
;:I" 'SiN:::I.......LS:::l^N I
aN'" NOU::JnMLSND:J ZIMC:J
mid. 11lH ~3wwns
NVld H3.1SVW
[
:l
~ ,
'"
u
X
..
< ,
:'i
I.U
(j
~
II)
~ Q
~ ~
<l:
Z ~
0
~ ~
t' ~ ii:
0
,. (j c..
. .
:J
c/:l
z lil
gO~~
LL_ .Ei
'" I-- ~ '"
~o uiL
ffi::JI-~:!
~cr:z~C:
~I-- UJ ffi~
",(1)2[5<
~z I- ~~
2'O(/):;.:~
oUw"
~N>~
\:!-z~
s: - 3?
a '"
z
o
w
ffi
J:-N!"1o...lnC.....IDQ~
~gSS9g9g9gg
\i:
w
'"
U
o ti
~ ~$
~~~~
~~ii:>.o
~~~g~
!i~(j:Jg
IlJz~8)-
~~;~~
cZ:r~
w<a:~
~ ~a:
t: z
~ 3'
01
---_/~/-//-'
, r-.:'
", l)~' 6
. r ~i
.~ i
_-'-I:-~--"'"
----..------------ ......
------ H
. ~ I
..-,
I
"-
I-:I
'Co
I. .~
, ;;,
\;. ;~' \
.J
-!
'"
h-
o
--.I
.\
~
i
.
2
!
i
~
s
C~"
~
'"
h-
o
....
!j
~'
~
..,:..
'~/:
'(
I
t
I
~
...-----.r ,-
;:?
h-
o
....
....
~
-1
.1,
!
I
::J-n 'S.l-N3WJ..S3^NI
aN'" NDI.L::In~.I-5ND;:] Z'M~
a~d - lllH ~3WWnS
SNOJJ.laNO~ ~NIl.sIX3
L
~~
~
Cr.
~ "
,~ '
:~~~!;;
!Ei+:
o.
~ .
..
- I
.
{r:~~
i",:..: ~:.~:::~
.
~ .. =
.
~O~"
~~...
~~
"r~
-.!:.
/
/
I
I
I _,
-,.;:!:
~2~~
.~ :-:~~
..... "I..J'.....
,~t~
'l. ""'~-
~ ~,Ii~
. CQ r1
~ ,
~(T.J
)
./
{'t1"-=OJ.V-l'-I"01'-.oa~'-"
. 'J-CLO(I[JI ol..t'c1.~'IOJI~~
\ /f -
j ,C.
( "TlS)
-----..'
~;~ I
.-'1
I
I
I
I
I
~~..
:;~~1i
~~:~~1.
~';"''''~
~i~~
:::-~~...
5~;!Ci:
\'ffi,:~~
~~~?1~rt
~~lIi:.
..~
~
~~
~;
F!
~
,
i ~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
06
20
0-1
- -1
I- en
OU)-~'7
C!: ::> I-- ~ :!
~a:z~~
~I-w:~
&:(/)OO:::::Cl~
:J 2'::::: z::<
(fJ I--~~
o (/) 1! f-
OwCll
N>
-z
~-
o
::!
,:>
-'"
~~
<0'"
~~
"-
~.
'0
'"
0;
~ :.'..
~ ..~..
~.~!<~ ...
';!~d
~ i~ I
[
o
~
i;
I
I 0
. cr:
~ !l...
f-
o u
<{ ~
~ ~~
Z 5Z
~~;t~
5gjffi>_~
~~~~~
!z~~3:;;f
~z::g8~
z;ii~w;:;
OD-Il<::
oZJ:~
l1J<{O:<l:
~ 00
j:: jgCl:
- Z
(j) :E
Qwiz Construction and
R1
Number: 096,01-04-01,00-0000
District: Windsor Hills Area. 8.829 Acres
July 24, 2006 Scale: = 200'
~-<)(QO\ ~j)
~-3
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Onl
~
7 2A 06
Date received:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Application fee:
. cJ:Y1_ 00
PCfBZA date:
Placards issw:d;
BOS dale:
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
~ Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 ~omp Plan (15.2-2232) Review
Applical1ts name/address whip
R. Fra 1 in Deve 1 opment COfQoratrion
P.O; Box 6244
Christiansbur
Phone:
Work:
Cell #:
Fax No,:
(540) 381-9700
(54U) 293-3234
(540) 381-1871
( S40) q.gq F.lt)3 3/J/~at:.71
Owner's name/address wlzip
William Herbert Liles II
. ,
2404 Electrlc Road
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No. #:
Property Location
Magisterial District:
Windsor Hills
Windsor Hills
2404 Electric Road
Tax Map No.: 76. 11- 0 1 -17 .00
Community Planning area:
Existing Zoning: R 1
Proposed Zoning: c-1 Office District
Proposed Land Use:Off ice Bu i 1 din 9
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes I)( No C IF NO, A V AR[ANCE [S REQUlRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes 'X No [!
IF NO, A VARIANCE JS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request?
"':~~~j)j~~~,,~~!~~~;ii',~~~~C"'~""~
Variance/Waiver ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appe:d of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal ofJnterpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County ZOlllng Ordinance
Appeal ofJnterpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Pleasecbeck ifenclosed, APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OFTHESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE
RlS/W/CP VIAA
~ Consultation
Application
Justification
J hereby certj fy that J am either the owner of Ih
of the owner.
RlSIWICP V/AA WSIWICP V/AA
8 1/2" x. 11" concept plan ~ Application fee
Metes and bounds descnption Proffers, ifapplicable
Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners
~e o7~Zt Dr~a:~urchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent
/c;{:I'. a...r Owner's Signature
2
Applicant R. Fra 1 in Deve 1 ooment Coroorat i on
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
This request provides an attractive and appropriate office
development. This office complex is appropriatelY located along
a major arterial street (Route 419) and is located adjacent to
existing commercial development. This property serves as a logical
buffer between the neighboring residenba:l oroperties and Route 419
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
This development does not promote strip/linear commercial
development, rather it provides an office comolex that is
designed around the contour of the land and provides extensive
screening and landscaping. Tasteful signage and a unified
architectural design will be provided.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
This project will have the normal demands of any office
development on water, sewer and other utilities. Schools.
parks, and recreation will not be affected by this develooment.
A buffer with vegetative and architectural screening is .
proposed to mitigate any impact on the surrounding proDerties.
3
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLlCA TION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the
Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County
Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation
requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in
making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would
necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments
and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
~, :a:2/;~ ~
Petitioner's Signature
7-cJJ- O(p
Date
Legal Description
Roanoke County Tax Map #76.11-1-17
Beginning at a point at the southeasterly intersection of the right-of-way line of Electric
Road (V A Route 419) and the right-of-way line of Wentworth Road, being the
northwesterly comer of a 1.26 acres tract; thence continuing along the southerly right-of-
way line of Wentworth Road N85D04'00"E, 310.65 feet to a point at the most northerly
comer of Lot 4, Sugar Loaf East, Section 1, Block 1 (Plat Book 7, Page 20); thence
leaving said right-of-way line and continuing along the westerly line of said Lot 4
S 13018'00"E, 131.00 feetto a point at the northeasterly comer of Lot 3 of said Sugar
Loaf East; thence along the norther! y line of Lot 3, Lot 2 & Lot 1 of said Sugar Loaf East
S64033'OO"W, 286.64 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Electric Road;
thence leaving the line of Sugar Loaf East and continuing along the easterly right-of-way
line of Electric Road N33041 'OO"W, 27.85 feet to a point; thence N18002'00"W, 211.16
feet to the Point ofBegil111ing, containing 1.26 acres as shown on survey entitled "Plat
Showing Property of William Herbert Liles, II & Rose Crocker Lilies" dated May 4,
1989 recorded in the Clerk's office of the circuit court of Roanoke County, Virginia in
Deed Book 1304, Page 1364.
1':~qris~,~f'~b,;~.:9~~t~~]~!':,'.'
, ~,; "~,' - ',".
....,..1
,"<'"""'.<
. ~"M' ".:.
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered, Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pemitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance ofa building pennit.
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use pemit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pemitted by the zoning district and other regulations,
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (J 5,2-2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some ofthe items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
following are considered minimum:
~ APPLICANTS
_ a, Applicant name and name of development
../ b. Dale, scale and north arrow
..../
c, Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
--- d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
--- e, Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc,
/" f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
~ g. All property lines and easements
h. All buildmgs, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
~ Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
_], Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
Additional information requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
/ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
./"
_ 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and Crossovers
/'" m, Topography map in a suitable scale and COntour intervals
..........--
n,
Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
--- 0, Locations of all adjacent tire hydrants
.,/ p, Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
~ q, Jfproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule
] ZyZ~tiZ4;];" ,boY< '" ~mp"t'
Signature of applicant
1-.1/- 00
Date
6
~ 01364
I)FVI;J'Z~
'-?'f3.773 MtR/Q1.4N
Pc. 481
~
~
~
"
~
~
~ !i
~l~
;':c ti
~
~
~ Ii
I~I ~ -
~ ~ -- cJ;,;r-o F? n4
<= ---;V;IIIN r. ' .
fi-H./S-o-r..oo,.w., 1".I~'
70 COMii:oFVIR(j/~ ----
m~.PJ. 7.1..4JG. ~o.L -
f<OA()j h.W.
UWY. P:Tt.~ 4-lq
I
GifCT~/C
VA.
NOTE:
THIS PROPERTY IS ~OT LOCATED
WITHIN THE LIHITS OF A 100 YEAR
FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED bY
FEMA. THIS CPINION IS BASED ON
AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE ~lAP AND HAS PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY
NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY OF
ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS.
WILLIAM HERBERT LILES. II
&
ROSE CROCKER LILES
SITU~TED ~T THE S.E. CORNER oP
ELECTRIC RO~D & WENTWORTH ROAD, S.W.
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SCALE: I" = 50 I
DATE: 4 MAY 19B9
BUFORD T. LUMSDEN & ASSOCIATES, P. C.
ENGINEERS-SURVEYOR.S
ROAHOKE. VIROINIA
COMh'.. # B'l- 'n;
I"-
,....
" ....
\"-
....
I I "'N'O"~~~~~~,:""'O" I
I. Iii . ld3:JNO:J
!l:;: >ll:l'v'd 381.::1.::10 Hl.l:JO
, ,.. MlN3M
(""'-\ \ '. " .
I i= I I
1 '" ' J r--
~ I___~~--<.:".J '" ",
I \"- ~~ .......... \ ~___i'~__
L__J 'gEjC, ,""
"'');;" .... W
,.~ '5 UJ" --.- U
poll 0 u Q" --.5...
~~~~ ~ t5 "-- -- -- "-
~~;:::~, -: u... ........ 10-
or-.ci.Ir o~ '-
___ NiD
I
illi
I'll
db
t!- Ii
. Ii' tH.
l'IJ'1 illl
Ill! !!J
~ a i
).: ~. lD
;in ~
~~~~~
o
D
; .- m
<i I Ii)
o gg
~~
'0:
~I~ Hi~ ..
, !!H f::.
~. ~:~. .t;~
."",_ :' i 1m
! . d! ~ ~m
,
~~
--,,=--~ ------
_ 0 - ---....
-l'"~--:: ~ )1
-d-8- ......
~> ~ - ---.. \. '\ ""
",Ol1'l
~.~-~.- ,,\
ou v.o-o:;..... '\.."\
---- '-. \
I
~-.....-T
OJ
,.--
....
....
'.
~
/0:::
l-
v
W
-1
W
r--
III
'"
~
'"
:".i
0-
g~~J
~K~~
o OU
....en"
/~~~~~
~~~~~
,
J.
.1
.'I
'I
I
I
I ,
I ,
I '
1 "
1.-'
.f
I
I
I
~ I
<>:0
15:;:"'\ 8
~ i:'~
~~~l /
cz~L /
,!..,8W ~
~()o --
\0001/11"-....
r-::::J~Lt'l1
oCDNOU
r
/
'--
/
~
~ III
g
~' ~
~..
/:
~o
~ Ee
:3~i~ci
ZOi;::..no
~ 2: w
~e~~t;
Ol-cnZ:K
l.olow5u
~~:~~
~~~'<j
U'Ilr1t.~~ ~
~~~~: ..Jvi
~~~~~ ~~
::iri~-f5 ~;t
i g~5~% ffi~
0:06 [ ~~
~i:J:j~ ~~
w80~~V) o~
iiS"~' ,j
~g~ff~6 J-~
NZ
e
z
:J
g
o
o
~,' 0:
<>
'T ~
- ~
"';'"
w w
~.~
......
'" III
'" 0
~ ~-~
u z Z Q::
~ 0( 0( l,J
V1' :t; ~ t:
~ ~ ':;; i
e>
z
i<
'"
o
8
u
[
III
....
'"
.stj
z
0'"
z~
".
,,'"
';'"
ox
"'~
loJ~l.i
~5~
","Z
~~-
,,0
",,,,0:
w 0
~~.V)
z ~
-,"'z
"..,'"
1=0..0
~~~
in-<)i!
~~~
:c:r~
~~~
~,...
a~
"'''
ZW
we>
~'"
~~
0"
za:
:>'"
~;
"':>
w",
00
z~
:>'"
w'"
n
:)5
'l.u
Ul;'4Ii
~~g
"' 0"
wJr~
~ ~5
,"''''
. ""
~
u'
'"
u
~
<< .
"
..,
~.
. .
,.
-!
.:
"
o
u
~
"
..
~
~
'"
Name: R. Fralin
R1
C1
Number, 76. 11-01-17,00-0000
District: Windsor Hills Area: 1,26 Acres
July 24, 2006 Scale: = 100'
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. H- I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Second reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 8.1
"Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code
to address steep slope development and other technical
amendments
SUBMITTED BY:
Arnold Covey
Director of Community Development
Elmer C. Hodge ~ !I~
County Administrator r
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~ --rf'~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This is the second reading of an ordinance to amend Chapter 8.1 "Erosion and Sediment
Control" of Roanoke County Code to address steep slope development and other technical
amendments. On August 8, 2006, the Board of Supervisors approved the first reading of
the proposed ordinance.
The Roanoke County Planning Commission and Community Development staff have
prepared amendments to the sections of the County Code that regulate erosion and
sediment control. These amendments establish slope angle and height thresholds for
constructed slopes. Any proposed slopes steeper or higher than the thresholds would
require additional geotechnical engineering investigation, design criteria, and reporting.
Community Development staff researched slope development ordinances from across the
United States and interviewed experts in the fields of geology, civil engineering,
geotechnical engineering, and urban planning. To develop the proposed amendments,
staff conducted six work sessions with the Planning Commission and worked with a
committee of experts in the fields of construction, grading contracting, civil engineering and
design, geotechnical engineering, as well as County engineering and planning staff.
The Planning Commission passed a resolution in support of these amendments at their
regular meeting on Monday, July 10,2006. A copy of the resolution is attached for review.
The Board of Supervisors reviewed the proposed amendments in work session on July 25,
2006. During the work session, the Board of Supervisors also reviewed additional
amendments that are required by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
(OCR) as part of the County's recent erosion and sediment control program review. At the
conclusion of the work session, the Board requested staff to prepare an ordinance for
adoption at the August 22, 2006 public hearing. The ordinance is attached for review. The
amendments to the erosion and sediment control code include:
. Limiting the angle of constructed slopes to 2: 1 (horizontal:vertical) unless a geotechnical
engineering report is provided for the proposed slopes.
. Limiting the height of constructed slopes to 25 vertical feet unless a geotechnical report
is provided for the proposed slopes. Constructed slopes with an angle of less than or
equal to 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) would be allowed to exceed 25 vertical feet without a
geotechnical report being required.
. Requiring "as-built" plans for any constructed slopes that required geotechnical
evaluation.
. Requiring soil compaction information on site development plans and compaction test
results submitted in development files.
. Requiring individual lot grading plans for all new subdivisions.
. Defining "Geotechnical Report" and "Steep Slope"
. Various amendments as required by the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation (OCR) as part of the County's recent erosion and sediment control program
review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Proceed with County Code amendments.
2. Do not proceed with County Code amendments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1.
A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION,
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MONDAY,
JULY 10,2006
A RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8.1 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE,
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
WHEREAS, in 2005 the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted revisions to the Roanoke
County Community Plan which suggest developing guidelines and regulations for steep slope
development, and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission included in their 2005 work program of
Community Plan implementation projects a steep slope ordinance, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County Community Development staff researched slope development
ordinances from across the United States and interviewed experts in the fields of geology, civil
engineering, geotechnical engineering and urban planning, and
WHEREAS, Staff worked with a committee of experts in the fields of construction, grading
contracting, civil engineering and design, geotechnical engineering, as well as planners and engineers
from County staff to review the issues and concepts of slope development, and generate discussion
and ideas about possible Roanoke County code amendments, and
WHEREAS, Staff presented these issues and concepts of slope development, and presented draft
ordinance amendments to the Roanoke County Planning Commission in work sessions in September
2005, and February, March, April, May and June of2006, and
WHEREAS, The Roanoke County Planning Commission has reviewed the research, project
methodology and proposed amendments to the Roanoke County Code, and
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends the
attached amendments to Chapter 8.1 of the Roanoke County Code, Erosion and Sediment Control to
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for their review and approval.
A COpy TESTE:
.L7d~
G. Steve Azar, C . an
Roanoke County Planning Commission
~~
Ja t Scheid, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.1 "EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ADDRESS STEEP
SLOPE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, in 2005 the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted
revisions to the Roanoke County Community Plan which suggest developing guidelines
and regulations for steep slope development; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County Community Development staff researched slope
development ordinances from across the United States and interviewed experts in the
fields of geology, civil engineering, geotechnical engineering and urban planning; and
WHEREAS, on July 10, 2006, the Roanoke County Planning Commission
adopted a resolution recommending that the Board of Supervisors adopt these
amendments to Chapter 8.1 of the Roanoke County Code; and
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2006, the Roanoke County Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors met in work session with County staff to review the proposed
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 8, 2006, and
the second reading was held on August 22, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County as follows:
1. That Chapter 8.1 "Erosion and Sediment Control" be amended to read and
provide as follows:
1
- - -- - - - -- - .
'--=-- ~ , ..,.. - . - - ,
- -
* '* * *
a
or
in
means an
or
(1)
com
area
1
cover
d
no
cover.
commun
or his
is
a
or
3
or
1)
4
(1
(11 )
n
or
1
or
or
d
6
is occu
means an area
means
on
* ;IIr :II 111:
7
---
(1
.
.-
.
-,
the buil '
8
(1)
is
undertake any of the activities included in subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsoctioA,
they shall be considered exempt from the provisions of this chaptor. -.-
, i " , ~ I . I'
1
o
11
1
'" '" '" '"
1 ,
1,
1 ,
3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
H-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Second reading of an ordinance authorizing conveyance of an
easement to Appalachian Power Company on property owned
by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, "Goode Park", to
provide electric service for KTP, LLC, Vinton Magisterial
District
SUBMITTED BY:
Pete Haislip
Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism
Elmer C. Hodge ~ &....0 /\
County Administrator ~ -7 '-
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
KTP, LLC, via Appalachian Power Company, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors
convey the following easement for the purpose of extending electrical service across
property owned by the County at Goode Park to the previously approved mini-storage
facility currently under construction by KTP,LLC:
A new 10' wide electric easement containing 200 sq. ft. across property
owned by the County at Goode Park and designated as Tax Map No.
061.01.01.03
Staff has met on site and has approved the easement location as identified on the attached
plat. In addition, Appalachian Power Company and KTP, LLC, have reviewed this proposal
and have indicated that they will accept this conveyance for purposes of this development.
"
Staff, utilizing the Roanoke County standard formula of 40% of assessed value of the
easement requested (200 sq. ft.), has determined the fair market value of this easement is
$60.00.
The first reading of this ordinance was held on August 8 and there have been no changes
since that time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fair market value of this easement is $60.00. These funds will be placed in the Parks
and Recreation capital maintenance fund to be used for improvements at Goode Park.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Authorize the conveyance of an easement to KTP, LLC for the purpose of the extension
of electrical service across property owned by the County at Goode Park and
appropriate fair market value payment of $60.00 to the Parks and Recreation capital
maintenance fund.
2. Do not authorize the conveyance of the easement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1, authorize the conveyance of an easement to KTP I LLC for
the purpose of the extension of electrical service across property owned by the County at
Goode Park and appropriate fair market value payment of $60.00 to the Parks and
Recreation capital maintenance fund.
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, "GOODE PARK" (TAX
MAP NO. 61.01-1-3) TO PROVIDE ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR KTP, LLC,
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a
parcel of land containing 15.69 acres off Goode Park Road in the Town of Vinton
designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 61.01-1-3 and known as
"Goode Park"; and
WHEREAS, KTP, LLC, a mini storage facility, has requested the conveyance of an
easement across this property to provide for the extension of electrical service to their
property which is adjacent Goode Park; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the
acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including easements, shall be
accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 8, 2006;
and the second reading was held on August 22, 2006.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and
are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power
Company for the extension of electric service to the mini storage facility of KTP, LLC.
2. That conveyance to Appalachian Power Company of the easement shown
and described as "Proposed New Pole and Proposed 10' Easement" on a plat entitled
"Proposed Right of Way on the Property of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County"
prepared by Appalachian Power Company, dated 5/15/06, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved.
3. That the County Administrator, or any assistant county administrator, is
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be
necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the
County Attorney.
4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
2
<(
-
:c
:c
)(
ill
z--.\
e
.......
~
'6
o
I.>-
.d.
~
~
0-
e
~
.......
"7
~
.d.
~
W
L.:lz
z......
........J
I-
00::
......W
X~
WD
0....
~
~
<[
0...
W
.::::l
o
o
CJ
(,I)
~ 0
o 0
(,I)>-g
.......> I- c::i
Zo
L...~='ri
OWOO
o...u .
>-:) 0
(,I)W"""';
I- ~~ 0
~, -"- .
.....0_
WOZ\D
0... <[0
D.::::l
~~D .
o...<[~~
OL..........
CQOX
W <[
I l-
I-
C\J
~
lL. .....
DUC?
>-..J8
1-..J1Ji
0:: ,~
wo....-
0....1-\0
D~O
0:: .
0.... i=l
x
<r
I-
C/)
i>- ~ ~UJ
iC{LLC/)J:LO~
~ 53:0>Z~Z
~ e ~J:C::::J
:II ",wo"
8 1-LL.a..u~
~ ~a~~w
~ ! -OLL~
II ~~U H
~ ~ o..zeoLL
iOO 0
c::: W
0.. I
I-
~ -I
~
-I
i
N
0>
CD
T"""
:>
;t
,
ci
z
~
~
o
<(~
-m
~~
0Lll
a::",
-0
>0
.co
>-r--.
~rr)
:Jz
000
u-o
1-0
lLJULll
~W~
O(f)~
~~ 0
~~....:
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER T - L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to approve operational guidelines for the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent Robertson
Director of Management & Budget
Elmer C. Hodge c;L-- 6"'+
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee was formed in September
2003 to review annual capital project requests of County staff and to make
recommendations on capital planning priorities for the Board of Supervisors' consideration
during the budget development process. This process allows a diverse perspective of the
capital needs of Roanoke County.
At the suggestion of the Board, staff has revised the operational guidelines for the CIP
Review Committee by adding a section that addresses appointments and terms (Section
E). The additions stipulate the duration of appointment, the maximum number of
consecutive terms that can be served, and the desire to stagger the terms of committee
members. These guidelines are attached for your review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed CIP Review Committee operational guidelines.
County of Roanoke
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee
Operational Guidelines
A. PURPOSE:
To allow a diverse perspective of the capital needs existing in Roanoke County.
This committee will draw upon its wide range of knowledge and expertise to review
submitted projects and make recommendations on priorities for the Board of
Supervisors' consideration during the budget development process.
B: DUTIES:
Review capital project summaries, interview department heads on submitted
projects, and participate in site visits as warranted. Rank submitted projects based
on approved ranking criteria. Develop prioritized grouping of recommended capital
projects to be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors.
c: MEETING SCHEDULE:
As needed.
D: MEMBERS:
Membership is to consist of members of County-appointed commissions/boards,
Board-appointed representatives for each magisterial district, citizens, and
administrative staff. Representation of the Planning Commission, Parks, Recreation
and Tourism Advisory Commission, Library Board, Economic Development Authority
(EDA) Board, and Public Safety are to be included.
E: APPOINTMENTS AND TERMS:
Appointment is for a one-year term beginning September 1 and expiring on August
31 of each year. Members of the Committee may be re-appointed to consecutive
terms; however, 3 consecutive terms is deemed the maximum that can be served. It
is the Board's intention to stagger terms to ensure operational continuity is
maintained while adding fresh perspectives on a regular basis. Deviation from this
understanding requires consensus agreement from the Board of Supervisors.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
I~-4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane S. Childers, CMC
Clerk to the Board
Elmer C. Hodge c,A
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (Appointed by District)
The following one-year terms will expire on August 31,2006: King Harvey, Catawba
District; James T. Anderson, Cave Spring District; Jason 8. Perdue, Hollins District; and
Erica Kuelz, Vinton District.
2. Economic Development Authority
The four-year terms of Craig W. Sharp and Allan Robinson, Jr. will expire September
26, 2006. A closed meeting has been scheduled to discuss these appointments.
3. Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Advisory Commission (Appointed by District)
Mr. Terry Harrington, Hollins Magisterial District, resigned from the Commission on May
18,2006. This three-year term will expire on June 30,2007.
TI-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 22,
2006, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes -August 8, 2006
2. Request from the schools to accept and appropriate reimbursements and state
funds in the amount of $253,335.19
3. Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $142,719 from
the Department of Criminal Justice Services for a juvenile and delinquency
prevention program
4. Resolution of appreciation to Sherman L. Hopkins, General Services, upon his
retirement after seven years of service
5. Request from the Library Department to appropriate state funds in the amount of
$11,048 for fiscal year 2006-2007
6. Request to accept the donation of a new variable width public drainage
easement situated on Lots 6 through 10, Section 15, Samuel's Gate at The
Orchards subdivision, from F&W Community Development Corp., Hollins
Magisterial District
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution,
1
.,
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
J-Q
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from the schools to accept and appropriate
reimbursements and state funds in the amount of $253,335.19
SUBMITTED BY:
Dr. Lorraine Lange
Superintendent
Elmer C. Hodge t' ff
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County Schools requests that the Board accept and appropriate the following
funds:
1. The laptop initiative provides a laptop computer to all Roanoke County students in
grades 9-12 for use in school and at home. Staff projects revenue of $150,000 will be
paid to the school system during the 2006-2007 school year for school labor under the
warranty reimbursements. The warranty covers repairs for four years and students are
responsible for deductibles under the Dell warranty. The warranty reimbursements will
be used to support the laptop program.
2. The Virginia Department of Education provides Roanoke County Schools with an
annual Carl Perkins ACT entitlement for career and technical education. Roanoke
County will receive an increase in the 2007 fiscal year entitlement of $2,908.19.
3. Each year the Virginia Department of Education (DOE) provides adult basic education
funds for each local school division. The funds are used to provide GED preparation,
adult basic education, and English as a Second Language (ESL) classes for adults in
Roanoke County. The school division will receive $89,777 for the 2006-2007 school
year.
.
4. The Project Graduation Summer Academy is funded by the Virginia Department of
Education. The academy is a remedial program designed to help seniors get the
verified credits necessary for graduation. Montgomery County was the Region VI fiscal
agent for the grant, but has relinquished that role and Roanoke County applied for their
share of the grant funds for summer 2006. The DOE has allocated $10,650 for the
summer 2006 Project Graduation Summer Academy.
FISCAL IMPACT:
. The laptop budget will be increased by $150,000.
. The career, technical and adult education budget will be increased by $92,685.19 (items
2 and 3).
. The remediation budget will be increased by $10,650.
AL TERNATIVES:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of funds in the amount of $253,335.19
as outlined above.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
=r:3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount
of $142,719 from the Department of Criminal Justice Services
for a juvenile justice and delinquency prevention program
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel R. O'Donnell
Assistant County Administrator
Elmer C. Hodge tlf
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County has received notification of a grant award from the Department of Criminal
Justice services (DCJS) in the amount of $142,719 to continue a Functional Family
Therapy program for Roanoke County families in need. The award is the third year of a
five-year program.
The goal of this program is to provide intensive in-home therapy services for juveniles who
otherwise would be faced with out-of home placements at a far greater cost. This is an
evidence based program that has proven successful in other localities. Blue Ridge
Behavioral Healthcare will be providing the counseling services and the County will serve
as fiscal agent.
The grant is renewable for 2 additional years. There is no local match for this fiscal year.
In FY08 there would be a 25% local match and in FY09 there would be a 50% local match
should the County wish to continue the program for those years. If the program proves not
to be successful, it can be cancelled after this fiscal year. The program does however have
a source of income as Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare is able to bill insurance and/or
Medicaid for a portion of the services provided. The plan is to identify alternative sources
of funding, which will include payments from insurance and/or Medicaid, to cover the 25%
local match in FYOB and the 50% local match in FY09.
This program will be coordinated with the Community Policy Management Team (CPMT)
process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As there is no direct match for this fiscal year and the intent of the program is to decrease
the costs of out of home placements, there will be positive fiscal impact for the County. We
do not anticipate a negative fiscal impact in FYOB or FY09 as we plan to identify alternative
sources of funding for the local match required in those years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the grant award from DCJS and
appropriate the funds.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
=-r - Ll
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution of appreciation to Sherman L. Hopkins, General
Services, upon his retirement after seven years of service
SUBMITTED BY:
Brenda J. Holton
Deputy Clerk to the Board
ElmerC.Hodge ~ (-(~
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Hopkins retired on August 1, 2006, from the General Services Department after seven
years of service. He has requested that his resolution be mailed since he will not be
attending the Board meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board approve the attached resolution and direct the Deputy
Clerk to mail it to Mr. Hopkins with the appreciation of the Board members for his years of
service to the County.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO SHERMAN L. HOPKINS,
GENERAL SERVICES, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER SEVEN YEARS
OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Sherman L. Hopkins was first employed by Roanoke County on
October 1, 1998, as an automotive mechanic in the General Services Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hopkins retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2006, as
a solid waste equipment operator in the Solid Waste Division of the General Services
Department after seven years and ten months of service; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hopkins was an outstanding employee and exemplified the
highest standards of positive public service; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hopkins, through his employment with Roanoke County, has
been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of
Roanoke County to SHERMAN L. HOPKINS for more than seven years of capable, loyal,
and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy and productive retirement.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER J" - 5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Request from the Library Department to appropriate state
funds in the amount of $11,048 for fiscal year 2006-2007
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent Robertson
Director of Management & Budget
Elmer C. Hodge t /1
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The final state budget includes an appropriation of $204,048 in grants for Roanoke County
Libraries in FY 2006-2007. The budget was adopted at $193,000 based on prelim inary
estimates. This request is to appropriate the additional state grant funds in the amount of
$11,048 to the fiscal year 2006-2007 Library budget. The additional funds will be used to
increase expenditures for book purchases.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will increase revenues from the state by $11 ,048 and add an additional $11,048
to the FY 2006-2007 Library budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriation of $11 ,048 to the FY 2006-2007 Library budget to reflect
final state budget allocations.
ACTION NO.
::T-L,
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
Request to accept the donation of a new variable width public
drainage easement situated on Lots 6 through 10, Section 15,
Samuel's Gate at The Orchards subdivision, from F&W
Community Development Corp., Hollins Magisterial District
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
Joseph B. Obenshain
Senior Assistant County Attorney
Elmer C. Hodge l'1f
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement conveyed to the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for a new variable width drainage easement in
Section 15, Samuel's Gate at The Orchards subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District of
the County of Roanoke:
Donation by F&W Community Development Corp, of a public drainage
easement, variable in width, across five lots situated along Crumpacker Drive
and a future extension of Morning Glory Drive. The location of said
easement is shown on a plat entitled "Plat Showing Variable Width Public
Drainage Easement situated on Lots 6 through 10, Section 15, Samuel's
Gate at The Orchards (P .8. 29, Pg. 101) being granted to The County of
Roanoke, VA by F & W Community Corp., along Crumpacker Drive, Hollins
Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" dated May 17, 2006, prepared
by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A.
The location and dimensions of this easement have been reviewed and approved by the
County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the easement.
-;::- :<l:
2 a ~
:t: ~: ~.
~"'(Q~G
at=! -h2;
~.lr]~ad
i-: cj ,h 0::
(O::::lIl:!Q
lr]:::l:~~k,
hU'jvi<>::G
a Q"'(
-Jlf)Q::Q::;:'"
<>::-'<:t=!h
a<>::i5t=!~
2Q::<>::'-'
8i-:aGJG
i-:l.l Cllc...J
,<:lulu
::::l U);:r: ,.,
h I-=' ~
11i ~ ~
. . .
~ lA 'FY_
,~~~
~0 ~ %
'~!_~~\t
~:I: ':: ~ ~ \ ~
\J~~ 'if
o~OJ ..:;;J
lUJSQ-luJ$800"o;O
V J.IHIH:X3
II
u
~
I~ ~
~~~~g~~!~~~~~~~~ ~
~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ou
~K_~~~~c ~_-_-~ ~~
~ '" '-~
"l
d
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~b~~~b.~
~~~~~~P. p~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
<n ~ en en en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::.:: en ::.:: en '.
"l~~~~~~~o_~~~~~-~
~QQQQQQQQ5QOQOOQQ
~~'~~~1~~16~~~~~~
Q~OOQ::goo~S55QSSo
'-'
4(/1/ (b "
241iIa
,{U07:J
:JNJNUOf'{
~
.....
~h
~~
o.,~
t=! kj
~~CI)
ah~
:t:~kj
~~kj
:5kjc.:J
Q~~
Q:l~
~~
~~
~q
!
j ~
I
;:..,0.;
hO::
S2G
~c...J
:Sh
)..:S2:
Q)8~
~~
....:j
~~
k,~
Q
<0 a a
0 8 <0
h;::s 0
C\j ,;., II
~S2Z ....: a ~
-~..... ~
Q::lr]~ >-
ctl
Q-Q;; :2
Q::Q~
lu-J
~'<:€:;
0-
"'(e:;~
Qi-:~
:::l:!!Jo
::::It=!\.)
Q::,<:
O:::l:~
t=!U)::<
<>::<>::0
a-:C:
-J-J~
"'(-Jo
~Q;;
j;:
'c
..
I
0 ~
~
-<
~
~
~
.... ....
~ is
~ ....~~
~ l,o.jC5aL5....
~ ~~~~~
Q i ~L5P::~~
Ii ~ ~~~~L5
<:J CJ~ ~~bl>-~
1&1 ~8 ;:IE:::J~~::J
.., ::l1Xl ::lCJ~oft;
Cl.....~3ii5:i!:~~
~~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I r; 51 . 1+9.54' .....J
~~S~~~ EelS W46'JJ E - 1 \
~~!g~~ 0J ~ a -J \ ~I
~a:~~<Ij~ ::'";.:} ~ ~ c:ti' \
~ I.. ~ ~ a:I.:::.:J ~ a I ~ I lU 'I
~ ;!~ ~ Ill! ~ -~! -~\n\
m _ Jj ; s::~,~~,~ : ~I
i1 ~ <.> ~, ..:'j ~ O"l '? I I
~ ftj f;k:m' ~ ~~ I I'D
""~~ ~, ~ :::5 -.J~ I
...~ is :'..-; ~ Q ~ "'" ,Jj'
~ i .(.' I;U ~ I is '
~ ~ :' '::::::.:" :ot _;:: I I
~...~~ ~ :~:::1 ~ ~~:g I ',' ,:~~ ~
l!!!~~l::! {;;: .,..':.> 3~ ,~~
Q!I!i!a b ,.J .... .... I I U
;b~ ~ ;~j ~ N ~:~.~ :! 1 ~ ~
~;I~ JU ~~ ~:~ i I ~
~::8~ ~ IJ 9~ g i~ it) ;
El;;;;) ~ ,~ i;j ~ j I ~
i ~ ~~j>.kr}~:':' '" s J:;::::~ E I ,_ ~
Q ':ilJ ........../ 0 v;
" 'b('j.,,<,;~~ ~ I I ~
~ 7", '\ " ~ ~ " ~
~ '~ ~~ :/i~a ~
..t.. " "\';'-o. /
V.....: "'" "'v- I /
~~~ ",,-c,. '::...'.~-J I :.,
"'/ .-~~~ 0:5 r\> '_~_
~~~;:~ -~
"'" ~":-J:~09~
*k 'G 'bdfJ~O' .. I
~<t>~ >J~ .. ~ ;
qJtxj .~~:;j~~
LJa.: ~ ::h: III ~ 3Ii
~l-..~' 'lol-..~' ~'f<1' .
t-:~ _Q..... ~
~ ."b~ooo;~!!lI'l~~.
~~;;.;f;jJ;;~...l')i~~
~ ~ ...,1... ~ ~ l.,. ~
u. k. l~ II . .. .. .. ~.
~I~;! l:!:~I.!"l ~~~ li'l~~
~ ~;ot"~l"l;;J-Pl!:~
~....~~:a18~~":!;;:!
::.::~~::.::~:t:<I)<I)"'::.::
~ ~5s~a~~8:~~8:.
:;O:~~...~~oN~lri:::!P
'f.J ..... _ Qt _ _ ~ ... ... _ ,.....
....
~ ~~~~~~8l:::~~.
~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :!
t-:
~~_;"""'r-.....' . ...,. .
'3<:l~"'!<:l...tlIg::a;,;;81
~~~~~~~'~~:.:e
~ ~ ~ ~I~I~ t) ~"8"8 ~.
~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~H! II Sj ~ 2!
-_:..: _:..:- -...
I
~ _L ..... 9> <:l -
V ~ "I::) 0 <:!il~ ~ (,) ~ ...., G G
d
z
Iii ~ w
....
..... ;l; <(
<( 0 0
a 0 UJ
~"':2:
~:g:o
",."'u
q.~u
..........0...
..........z
o6w
",.",.0
~~t/)
.. ..:2:
WX:J
Z<-J
au-@
I -J
c.. :;:
:::;:
-J
:;:
:::;:
w
:J 00
Z (;
w ",.
> N
< <
Z Z
2",[3
""",0.::
&3.:85
~ N u..,
~X""
~:i5~
iQ(j
",.c..c<
UVl
.. c::r:;
o....w
-z
UJz
W<
E-.....l
-<r.;9-
if)
~c::r:;
Uo
0>-<
U)w-
U)>Z
<r;c::r:;(3
~c::r:;
:z: Vl -
Ui>
Wc::r:;..J
OW:::.::
U)wO
:2:~Z
---, 0 <
~zO
-Jwo=
"
0.. P')WUO m g 0 \JnS \0 o~so \S ooz \ S~UIMe JP\ 'M
N-l
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Amount
% of General
Amount
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2006
$13,261,742
8.07%
13,261,742
8.07%
Balance at August 22,2006
Note: On December 21,2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to maintain the General
Fund Unappropriated Balance for 2006-07 at a range of 8%-9% of General Fund Revenues
2006 - 2007 General Fund Revenue $164,315,790
8% of General Fund Revenues $13,145,263
9% of General Fund Revenues $14,788,421
Submitted By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Elmer C. Hodge ert
County Administrator
Approved By
N-9
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL RESERVES
Minor County Capital Reserve
(Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.)
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2006
Amount
$5,834,217.50
Balance at August 22, 2006
$5,834,217 .50
$5,000,000 of this reserve is being used to upgrade Public Safety Radio System
Maior County Capital Reserve
(Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.)
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2006
$679,628.00
2006-07 Capital Improvements Program-New County Garage
(500,000.00)
Balance at August 22,2006
$179,628.00
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge t'H
County Administrator
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2006
From 2006-2007 Original Budget
July 11, 2006
Appropriation to hire County Gypsy Moth Program, Inc.
to serve as the Gypsy Moth Coordinator
July 11, 2006
Appropriation for Legislative Liaison
Balance at August 22, 2006
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge t H
County Administrator
N-3
Amount
$ 23,297.00
100,000.00
($10,000.00)
($18,000.00)
$ 95,297.00
FUTURE DEBT PAYMENT RESERVE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2006
FY 2006-2007 Original budget appropriation
Less increase in debt service
Add Economic Development Dropoff
FY 2006-2007 Annual Capital Contribution
County
Schools
Balance at August 22, 2006
2,000,000
(3,079,903)
811,000
600,000
600,000
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By Elmer C. Hodge (1/
County Administrator
N-li
$ 5,941,772
(268,903)
1,200,000
$ 6,872,869
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. N- 5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August22,2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Accounts Paid-July 2006
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge (H
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit Checks Total
Payments to Vendors $ $ $ 5,258,771.29
Payroll 07/14/06 937,084.58 140,658.90 1,077,743.48
Payroll 07/28/06 900,246.72 130,833.35 1,031,080.07
Manual Checks 2,408.36 2,408.36
Voids
Grand Total $ 7,370,003.20
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
r ~
=- Q
1:0:1
'c
.~
;>
Gf
.:.:
=
c
1:0:1
=
~
...
=
.c
c
=
=
u
~
o
N ....
'C ~
~ ~
8
~
....
:;;;
'"
c
,S
...
1:0:1
.;::
Co
=
...
Co
Co
<
-=
C
1:0:1
'"
<3)
...
C
1:0:1
...
,.Q
8
=
...
c
~
.;;
<3)
...
=
:0
c
<3)
Co
~
~
...
=
<3)
'3
-=
<3)
.c
...
rLJ.
.. ......
Q"i"~",,.~"
s g.. ~ ~
... ... ~ : i;
.. r.l oil ..
;.
..
u
"
~ ] ~
e e Q
i e s
.. " ..
Q, r.l ..
~ ~ ;;::
\Q
s:;:
-
l:!:1
I:"-
o
..
u
"
~ f
~ .c
" e
:I "
:I j;
.3 r.l
"l::I
II
"l::I
Cl
t.l
"l::I
,S
..
II
'"
.c
;;
Q
:8
li
;>, e
:c :s
;; ~
~ S
-
o
II
;:
..
Q
~
...., '" '"
1:"-""''''
M..o..t
~
..
...
e II
" "
u ..
" ;;;
:l III
;J
......"''''
1""'1-:00
'" r--:
"'....,'"
....."''''
lnOOM
-...... ......
...., '" N
0\
G:)d::!
oOo.:r-:
\Q '" "'"
00 0
OO"M
"''''-
'"
o 0
Ol-:O
d.-a
'"
00
0\
....,
....,""''''''
'"
oooor-:
'" ...... "'"
-"'0
~~fd'
'"
..
..
....
"
III
000
o~~
OO.-ln
NO"'"
'" 00 ......
"," ",' ..0
'" ...., 00
....,NN
o'
"l::I
"
"
~
E
II
"
II
"
'"
l::
OIl
'2 ~
's OJ
"'0 'u
<8
o
o:d
"0
~
o
eo
OJ
'u
C
0:1
C
~
~ o:d
'~] ]
~ OJ ~
~fiOJ
.-H.:l iil
=
=
....
"l::I
"
"
~
N ....,
000
000
It'l
\Q
..0
'" '"
001:"-
..0..0
00
....,
00
00
00-
r-:
\Q
-
<=>
-
00 ....,
~c;
'" '"
"'" "'"
"'N
-.DO::
N '"
- ......
M
\Q
vi
00
o
~
M
I:"-
N ......
...... 0
N..o
....,
o. '"
...., .......
00 '"
;:::
...;
00-
00
0;
....,
00
~o
00
-
00-
...;
00-
-
~
00
\Q
N ......
...... 0
N..o
- ....,
o '"
f1'1r-.:
00 '"
o
o
..;
I:"-
o
...;
00-
00
~
00
00
OON
'" 00
'" -
",' .......
0'"
N.OO
...
..
..
...
,ra
'"
's
"C
..(
...
c
.,
e
E
.,
...
o
\.:)
1::
~
::l
01)
<<i
'u
'6
::l
....
~ ~
o -5
UO
-;
..
.,
'"
.,
\.:)
o
o
-
o
- N
00
N N
00
~
..0
V') 00 00 M
o V') M V')
00 0 \4:i00
-
-
M
...;
00-
I:"-
vi
M
<:J).
-
N"'=t' N......-I
V'lt""-N\O
00r-..:r-iv-i
......""""'00
~~:~~
NOO\O\
\O.,~~~M
00-
......
00
....
00-
<=>
....
-
00 ...... 00 '"
~..ol-:;:;
'" 0 '" '"
V')V'l\O""1"
t""--- 0'" oo~ v;;
00"'"
0., ~'" "'=t'
o
o
=
000
"""000
-.dr--:oo
""" N """
t""-.. t""- 00..
or;
o 00
-
00-
I:"-
00
....
00-
<=>
....
-
............00'"
o l-:<"!
Oo\'-M
!"""""It""-lnO\
~'" t""-", ~ ~~
- 0"'"
'" o. """
o
o
=
....
l:"-
v;
\Q
o
...;
o 00
~o:oo
lnMow:ro\
ro""IlnOOt""-
'" I:"-
o..Po ~ 00 r-"
ro""IOO~
"'''''"'<1"'<1"
N' o' ",'
c
o
U
u
8
e
f-
o:d
-;
'0
:;
"
...,
c
,9
c
E ~
~~Cl8
OJiilo:dc
2 ~ c 0
S Woi .2 U
&j"8t)Oj
0:1 ~ e
~ ~ 0 'i:;
-i~U<t;
o
o
M
o
......-I N M "'=t'
0000
M M M M
10 10 10 0
00
It'l
00
Or-MV')M~
"'00"'",
oO-.:ir-:oor-:r-i
00-
o
..;
o
....
vi
-
~
......
M
\O.-t""-t""-MM
~~~~~~
00"""000",,"
~~Po~::~~~
"'=t'O\N\O"'=t'OO
M"'=t'\O_t""-O\ro""I
..,f....,N'
M
00
r-:
"'"
f'1
:'2
It'l
...;
,
""''''....,....,..........,
t""-""1" 0\V'lV'l
v1'r.:V'l-.:i-.dN
0000 00",,"
'" """ '" \Q. """. '"
v) v) M....... - 0\"-
t""- t""-~oo
NNN
-
....
:J
~
M
00-
-
"'N......OOO
o\~~~~;J
10 V'l 10 10
...... 0 '"
~.. :2"' ;; bf ~
-
"'"
..;
....,
00-
<=>
......
~
M
"'......'"
"''''N
..Q..oo\
"'0",,"
'<1"1:"-1:"-
oo~ ~#, N
NO....,
N N
,
....,..........,
"'''''''
.--.o~
00",,"
\Q """. """
0\.- 0'"
::;!:ooM
~
...;
It'l
\Q
<rS
I:"-
00
0;
M
000000
0~~~00
r--:'-MM..QN
o..O\V'lNt""-O
V'looNO\t""-r---
r--:- o' r-: N' ....... ",'
"'ON......
~ ~~ ~~ ;;:~ O~ M
.c
~
..
00
,~
:s
"
i:l-.
OIl
"0
C
::l
e
o
o:d
OIl OIl
8 ~ ~
'I: 8. ~
Cl) ~ .-
01) ,- ::l
_Cleo
e 1Il c
~ ~ .~
o~::E
~
Q.
,W I!i g
~ ,9 U
~ U ~
'~~ ~
w.5o
o
o
....,
o
NM~V"i\O
000101010
""" """ "'" """ """ """
10010101010
....
It'l
..0
00 NOO
~~~"':~~~
I:"-
\Q
..;
00
\Q
..;
It'l
It'l
M
-
00
00
.000
'"
'"
0\
o
'"
_ 00
~~
o '"
~""""
"''''
'"
~V'l"
00 0 0
I""'1CC!
V"i.oV'l
"'000
N 0
M M r-"
..........,......
N
N'
....,
....,
r-:
It'l
"'"
<rS
I:"-
00
OO",NNOO
OOM('1"')\OOO
OO..tN..tOO
0"""0
'<I"......N
00' """. ..0
NN",,"
...., ....,
....
~
00
~
-
-
M
0000000
~~~~~;;~
00-
o
..0
I:"-
It'l
v;
\Q
\Q
OO"'NNOO
oo....,....,~oo
OO...tN"""00
0",,"0
"""......N
oo-.:f~
N N """
...., ....,
o
o
N
"'"
-
......
...
"'"
......
-
0000000
oooooo~
o oo..Q..ooaV'l
\0000000
~~N.,~~~~~
00\t""- Mt""-
"'''''"''''''
~ In'' r..f
~
..
o
~
c
.9 U
g -<
OIl OIl
'2 8
's .~
"0 OJ
< 01) OJ Q.)
U'I Cl) ~ ~ U'I
8 ,~ ~ U ,~
'I: fi .~ ~ [:
J:l il < ,52 J:l
OJ a ,g ,~ OJ
'u g :0 if} 'u
~u.::t.5~
.l:!
:s
=
llo
-BE
OJ 0:1
Q.) OJ
:r: :r:
OJ u
~ :3
::i.::t
o
o
"'"
o
.......-4ro""1~V'l\Ot""-oo
1010101010010
V'llnV"iV'lV'lV'lV'l
101010010100
N--fo
......
=>
vi
I:"-
\Q
...;
-
....
r-:
<=
-
......
-
...
"l
-
It'l
...
0;
00-
\Q
<=
o
=
....,
....,
..:
It'l
~
00-
00-
'"
o
o
vi
\Q
l:"-
v;
o
00
::r
OIl
.:
o
'~
.~
f!l
o
<3)
..
.,!
'ii
~
"C
C
..
.c
...
-;
..
=
o
o
It'l
<=
" .Q .... "" I- <:> 00 Q'- ..". <:> Q\ I- 10 "" <:> <:> <:> QCl I- 10 Q\ "l
~
.. "" e 0 ti 00 - QCl 10 "" "" C! <:> C! " M C! C! C! It'l C! "'": C! 'C
N '" Q c ::I f. ~ "" r..: M '" "" Id r..: '" oZ ~ ....;
.9 .. '"
8 c. c . ::I
N .. ... fol ~ III
t:;; .. fol olI .
"
~ >
" ~ ~ "" N 0 l- V') N ..". 0 - M N N 0 0 0 I- 0 :! "Of' -
.. .. 0 C! - ""! V') 00 C! =- 0; t"! I- 0 0 0 QC 0 - -
'" Q .Q .. N oZ r-i Id 00 ....; N d d d ~ d r..: r-= It'l
"- e M V') V')
'" - 0 Q'- - M N 00 'C N ..". M 0 0 0 =- V') 'C N
::I ..
'" .l! "" 0 V') - Q'- Q'- N "!. 00, 0\ 00 0 "'l 0 = ..".. t- - =-
c r..: ....; rxJ ~ rxJ t-" ~ rxJ ..; ..D o' N ~ 0 ...r It'l
.. . "Of' M - -
c III ..". N ..". - V') Q() 0\ 0 It'l M M N 0 V') t- - 0 ..". "Of' =
;:J ..". M M - t- "" - It'l. - o. 10 M N 10 Q(), "Of' "Of'
....; N' ~ - M M r-= -6 r.c r.c
t- t- It'l
-
..
'" V') 00 0 .., V') Q() 10 0 =- t- oo 00 0 0 0 .., 0 10 'C =
c
E 1! ~ ~ 0\ 0 QC '<I; ..". 0 = 0 t- t"! 0 0 0 - 0 00 QCl QC
,&l ~ V') ..; d d - ~ oZ d ....; d ..; "" d d d d d oZ ~ ~
! e "" 0 0 'C N 0 ..". I- 0 V') ..". = 0 - "Of'
:<; ::I .9 - "" 10 N "'- N Q'- I- 0 M "Of' 0 "'l It'l. 5-
.. .. ..". 0:: N' ~ V') ",' Q()- 0 ..".' N ~ 0 - -
.. c :: "Of' = "Of' l- t-
fol t- V') ..". ..". M - V') N
c. .. N - "Of' - M .., Q\
... olI > It'l
fol
'"
c
,S 1;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = 'C
....
" .. .. 0 0 0 <:> 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = "l
'i: " 1! d d d d d d Id d '" d d d d d d = d d = r-i
:a ,&l N N ~
C. " e M "l.
=> '" ;; '" rxJ QC ...r
.. ..
c. ~ 1:1 " It'l
~ fol "Of'
~ 0
" "0 I-
=
'j; c
.6iJ "
'"
.. ..
;; u
C
or " "0 ~
..
..:..: .. "0 "" 00 0 "l "" 00 '" 0 =- I- 00 00 0 0 0 "l 0 '" 'C "Of'
=> .c " ~ ! ~ Q'- 0 QCl '<I; ..". 0 = 0 t- t"! 0 0 0 - 0 00 QCl "Of'
l: e ~ :<; :<; V') ..; d = - ~ M d r-= d ..; V') d d d = d 0: Q'\ r-i
" = "0 ;; " V') 0 0 'C N 0 N "Of' 0 "" ..". = 0 - in "l
=> U 0 0 8. V') '" "!. '" N '" "Of' 0 M "Of' 0 "" 'C
~ C 'I: ~ ... "Of" 0:: N" 'C vi' -6 0 ...r ..; ci ~ 0 ..: r.c
~ .. "" ..... V') "Of' ..". ..". =- M "Of' V') N t- -
.... Il. N "Of' M "l It'l
=> ..; .... It'l
.e- .. OJ
.. 0
c .s ::>:
=
=> :0
u c -
.. =
c. ..
l'I of!
~ ti
.... .. .. 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = -
=> 0 "" 0 C! C! = 0 0 0 C! = 0 0 C! 0 0 0 = 0 C! = =-
'"' ::I 00 "Of' ....; "" oZ 00 "" r-= N d Q() d d d = d ..... r-= Q'\
.!:! III '" 0\ ..... V') N M .., N = ..... 0 0 = = "" M QC 'C
= "', V') "l. ..... - 0\ N 0 Q() =, - = "'l = It'l .."., N 'C Q\
"0 N' It'l M ..; rxJ rxJ It'l t-=' V') ~ 0 N It'l N ...; ~
.. '" 0 0 'C 0 0\ "Of' 0 It'l :::: M M 0 "" t- 'C V') '" - .....
.c '" "" ..". It'l 00 '" ~ M '" M It'l '" 00, It'l "l.
u M C"; '-d' M M r-= ..0 r.c
r;n - ~
t- .....
-
::.
<(
o
'" ....
'4:1 .:.i
15 <:!
...
"0
1:1
:I
'"'
"iii
..
..
..
..
'"
g
...
i:i
"
S
..c:
u
'C
c
"-l
c
.g
<<i
l:!
u
~
O/J~~
~:e'5
~-lU
""
1:1
"
'"'
- N M
= = =
'" '" '"
000
-;
..
.s
'ii
U
o:d
l:
.51
OJ
..
..
...
..
~
i
..
"
g,.
~ ,~
8 "
~ r;n
5 i:i g
OIl 'Uj g, ~
,5 ij .S! ::I:
E ~ ~ 0
N "-l " ~
O/J ,~ ~ ~
~ e 'E :E
'2 8, 0 'E
gOo5..
_ u 0
~U"-lU
=
=
'C
=
..... N ("I"l tr'l
0=0=
f""-. f""-. r-- r--
0== 0
....
1:1
..
e
c.
oS
..
t
Q
C
'a
:I
5
E
=>
U
0,
::l
..
'"
"
u
0,
~
u
'5
g
::I:
O/J 5
~ .5
"5>
'" "
g~'5
OJ "oj ~
3~~
"B~VJ
,;!l ~ ~
~E-I:l::
t;::
'" "
.;:: g
" -l
i:i E
~ !:
OJ '"
>'U
%.~
s ,::;
"-lCl
o
<:>
t-
o
NM.."."'.....
000000
00 00 00 00 00 00
000000
'"
"iii
"0
!-<
"0
"
.
..
'"
"
u
g
"@
o::l
~
c
~
,5
i:i
o
U
;;
=-
..
e
t:
"
eo
Q
=
o
Z
:;
o
l:
~
..
c
e
!-<
::; ::l
00
i::l i::l
<2<2
~ ~
!-<!-<
" "
c c
..g~
OJ e
.5.5
=
o
QCl
o
=
o
Q\
o
N
= =
0\ 0\
00
~ ~
0. Ci
.!!
c
's,
..
;;
i
=
c
....
~
...
=
a
c
=
=
u
~
.-. N
:g 0
Z N
Ci: ~
'"
o
o
t!
~
00
'"
<II
=
C
<II
;.-
~
OJ
=
...
...
-<
"0
C
'"
"0
<II
...
'"
.~
...
'"
foil
...
=
-=
<II
e
<II
...
....
...
V'J
~ ...
~ ~ = ......
Q a ~ ~
2 ~ ea 1
= ~ :i =
>-
....
OJ
,!S OJ
;; '"
OJ =
.. ..
= ;;
~ ell
~
..
o .,
.s ~
.. =
.. ..
OJ ,.
>- ~
\0
s;::
-
~
r-
o
.,
.... ~
:f e
= ,.
" ..
::; r:z:
....
..
....
=
"'-l
....
"
'I:
..
Q.
""
;;
"
::;
-
o
OJ
-5
..
"
100.
OooO~OO~N~~OOOOO~OON~OON~ ~~~~~OO~O~O
~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
N 00 ~~oov ~N OO~~NNV ~
N~ N
00 OV'lOON"'OO~OOOO
~~g~~g~~lr)~gggg
o 0 0 ..0 r-' 0 oc; "," ~' 00 0 000
"'NOO'>~"''''~ "'V'lV'l~0'>
~~~V1 ~~~-..OO..V:-Vi~~
r- N
r-~
N
~o
V'lN
00,
'"
r- ~
N'"
.,f'o
V'lN
00,
,
V'l
0'>
r-
",'
,
V'l
~
r-
~
OO~
V'l V'l
'" r-
0'>" N'
V'l N
o 0 ~
V'l V'l
'" r-
a{N
V'lN
,
N~
00",
~. q
V'lM
~
N
,
NM
00",
~o
yo)~
~
N
O~
o 00
0", N...
V'l V'l
ON
~~~~g~N~~~
~",;;",N",\O",V") ~~"'~"'~~M
V""l'l::f"'"1"'V o-..N -
NN "'''' M
'7'" ~
"'V'l
M
["--....~
~
00
0'> V'l
or-
N" ",'
N
"'V'l00
M 0'> V'l
~"'~~~
~ M
OJ
..
....
=
=
~OOOOONOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOO
'VOOOV")ON~OOOOOOOO ~o
.,f'OOO~OOOa{O~OOOO~~ NoO
Ng~~M~8~~~~~$~ON ~~~
'7" r-"' N 0fJ'" ~ ~ M
r- N
V'l
0'>
N
....
=
=
'"'
'i
..
OJ
=
OJ
'"
o
0.
o
'" ~
~~8
~e-t;
Vl '" 0 ~
'" 1:; U 0
~ '" 0 E
f-o.o~
e .- ~
~ ~ , '"
* ca ~ .~
UJ C (J ,-;:
c;j ~z~
IU QJ ::s u
c.::~~~
=
=
....
"
"
'"'
'"
o
~
f-
4-.
o
~ ~
:.:if-
<=: ~
t:~
'"
Ec;j
2 g
~ ...l
~ ~
f-f-
@~
:5 8
e; :.:i
o Vl
E 13
~ ~
c: .~
o ::l
Ua:l
~
~ ~ ~
.... ~ ~
~ ~ f-
~.g E
8 -:;j ~ g
:.:i'Ef-c.::
~ '" 8 ~"'i)
C'd tJ us:::::::......
f-:ac.::8.g
'" 0 ~ ,_ "'"
.~ > 0 ...l ol:l '
-5o"'O_Vl
c _ Q) .- U IU
J:~~5~~
'"
-0
o
o
....
-0
~
0.
~
~
'"
'"
'"
~ ~ V)
'" 00 '"
\.t.. C J:
"8::9 t
r.n C 05 ::s
'" 0 a::I 0
~U"O ~
f-,"~_ 0
.. E "0 'j:: ~
~ '2 ~ 11 ~ '"
O<...l~J:u
'VN\.O\.OV'}
~ V'l ~
Mr-ViMVi
~'NN""a{
N r-O'>
N
~N
~
Mr-
.,f' N"
N
'" '" V'l
- V'l ~
V'l M V'l
N""a{
r- 0'>
N
..,;.'"
~<:r:
N
~
-
.
r-rr. l.rl.QooooO'\["--.O'\
OOlflOOONOOV")'VNN
NlflNVf"-.-f'I""I...Nv;.,r-
..qft ~ '7'" 0\ 0\ 0-," l.{") 00'" l.{) '7'"
OO_f'I""I V") VI VI \.0\.00 Vi
N V'lN~r-"~::;'M;::;-
M ~
"'V'l
0V'l
~o
0'>'"
t""'it""'i~
"'V'l0
OV'lN
r-"o,""
0'>'"
;,..,f' E
o g, '"
6 ~ ~ ~
::E ~ 0 '" 0
'0 '0 't ~ a
~~8,~_~~
:::> :::> .- 0
EEt:c~c.::tJ
08r.fJ6::~~o
~~~t8]g~
oU<<IJr.i'Jtflr.n~~
::::I::::Icuu.b oU
~flQ/)e!lE'E~
~ ~ ~ ~ 'OJ '" u
c.::c.::uuc.:::;~
~..Aoo
000V'l
N~O'>
N 00 1.J:)r.
_~o
N
,
-
r-
0'>
N
-
~
~
NOO
ON
~..qrc
r- ~
-
00 0
~ 0
"'. V'l
OOOONMOO
OOOlr)f""""IViO
~ ~r. ~.. l"'l f'.. r:. 0"
~~N~\O~~
~M
';'00
00V'l
~a-.
00..0
~ 0
N
~
r-
0'>
'""
~
~
NOO
ON
...;~
r-~
'"
'" ~
~.€
~~
U 0
;,..,....
0."0
o ~
o '"
.8 '"
o ~
...:: .-
~\.t..
oooooor--..O\oo
oor--.oooovo
~5~~~~~~
N \OiI"")iI"")\"cro')OO
V')N~r--....~~ ~
0lJ
'"
-:;j
~ ~ ~
o u
'E ~ 'E "0
~ ~'15 ~ :<
"""~~--;
~ "g ~ og
g, r.fJ U r.fJ
x ~ ~ ~
(.IJ Q,) ~ u ~
~~i~]~
<Jj:3:0:3:0~
c;j
u
';:;
o
00
o
-:;j
U
.::
o
z
(;j
o
.;:;
~
'"
~
U
O-N~~~N~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
000000000000000000000000000000000000
N '"
0
0
C.'
E'C
'" "
~ ." ... N
~ " = ::
:;
,. ]< CO ~
~ 8 ~ " 0
.. .. "
" " ."
" c.: "
;..
...
OJ;
06'JJ
..
:;
i
o
=
...
~
...
o
~
=
=
o
U
<II
4.>
=
=
4.>
..
~
';
.e
u
-<
"0
=
'"
"0
4.>
<;j
e
:::
<II
r.ol
...
o
....
=
4.>
e
~
...
{;i
\0
e:
...
~
.....
Q
...
:a
;;
=
'"
...
"
...
co
~
...
=
'C
"
=-
..c
0:
=
'"
....
Q
"
-=
..
=
~
\0
.....
\0
....
"!'
Q
M
\0
....
"!'
a-
"1
....
....
"l.
N
"!'
a-
"1
....
....
"l.
N
Q
.....
a-
'Ii
.....
"'l-
"!'
\0
....
M
":;
Q
f-
...
co
f
"
N-~
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER BUILDING PROJECT
BUDGET REPORT
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Northrop-Grumman
Date Description Contract Amount Contingency
12/03/04 Opening Balance $ 26,030,769 $ 780,817
01/27/05 Change Order (001) 21,065 (21,065)
01/27/05 Change Order (002) * 53,835
01/28/05 Progress Payment #1 (1,456,157)
02/24/05 Progress Payment #2 (403,222)
03/24/05 Progress Payment #3 (375,678)
05/13/05 Progress Payment #4 (855,272)
06/1 0/05 Progress Payment #5 (401,210)
06/20/05 Change Order (003) - Establish Guaranteed
Maximum Price (51,387) 51,387
06/28/05 Change Order (004) - Foundation change 319,034 (319,034)
07/14/05 Progress Payment #6 (378,417)
07/27/05 Progress Payment #7 (445,669)
08/10/05 Progress Payment #8 (759,513)
08/23/05 Change Order (005) - Sewer Line Replacement 124,407 ( 124,407)
1 0/05/05 Progress Payment #9 (774,442)
10/13/05 Change Order (006) - Convert Citations and
Warrants Databases no cost
1 0/20/05 Progress Payment #10 (664,909)
12/08/05 Progress Payment #11 (1,196,297)
Northrop-Grumman
Date Description Contract Amount Contingency
12/08/05 Change Order (007) - Minor Changes to Radio
Equipment no cost
12/08/05 Change Order (008) - Additional conduits for
redundant 911 feed no cost
12/08/05 Change Order (009) - Regrading slope from
road cut south side of Cove Road 3,737 (3,737)
12/08/05 Change Order (010) - Coordination of sewer
line with Glen Cove School water line no cost
12/28/05 Progress Payment #12 (1,130,054)
01/03/06 Change Order (011) - Refrigerated storage
for evidence storage 24,621 (24,621 )
01/20/06 Change Order (012) - Modifications to
voice radio transition plan 84,060
02/02/06 Progress Payment #13 (1,099,134)
03/09/06 Progress Payment #14 (1,164,468)
04/05/06 Progress Payment #15 (1,464,883)
04/18/06 Change Order (013) - Extension of 8" Fire
Service Line to rear property line no cost
04/20/06 Progress Payment #16 (1,671,792)
06/01/06 Progress Payment #17 (1,307,330)
06/15/06 Progress Payment #18 (1,902,683)
06/21/06 Change Order (014) - Modifications to IT
Carpet Squares, DAC ES Cards &
Console Upgrades 4,823 (4,823)
Northrop-Grumman
Date Description Contract Amount Contingency
06/21/06 Change Order (015) - Utility/Permit Allowance
for WVWA new Fire Hydrang Fee no cost
07/20/06 Change Order (016) - Additional security features
and office space addition to Police
Evidence Storage area 31,723 (31,723)
07/20/06 Change Order (017) - Addition of EIFS material
to roof screens for improved appearance
and additional electrical boxes in Police
Polygraph area 49,085 (49,085)
07/27/06 Progress Payment #19 (1,592,012)
Balance at August 22, 2006 $ 7,652,630 $ 253,709
· The funds to be used for change order #002 were taken from departmental E911 funds.
Submitted By,
Dan O'Donnell
Asst. County Administrator
Approved By,
Elmer Hodge
County Administrator
I-
U
W
...,
o e:(
0:: Z
D.. _
C)I-C)
zO::O::
2i~>
:::!ww
::JO::::':::
mo::O
o::wz
woe:(
1-0::0
ZOo::
wwLL
UC)O
~~~
w::Z:Z
LLU::J
e:( 0
U) U
~
..J
m
::J
D..
N-8
- - - - - -
1.0 1.0 I'- oq I'- en en en I'- en 0 en ('i)
- <0 ('i) co ('i) 0 0 0 0 ('i) 0 N (0 0 N
C 0 co ('i) o. oq. u u U I'- U ~ 0 u co
:::::l ..- ('i) ..- Gl oq 0 0 0 M 0 oq ...t 0 oq
0 N 1.0 1.0 ..- N c: c: c: c: N co c:
E - ('i)
<(
b'7
....
Q)
"C
....
o
Q)
c
ctl
..c
()
<J)
....
ctl
~
o
en
o
<(
U
"0
<J)
-
ctl
~
-
a..
::;:
en ~
"0
c:
::J
....
en
in "0
o c:
(.) ctl
"0 0
<J) <(
ro u
Q5 "0 ..-
c::: ~ 0:;
w
<J)
u
'C J!1
a.. "0
E en
::J ~
E ~
19 'x 0
c: ctl -
<J) ::;: <J)
E "0 ::J
t:: <J) "0
ctl <J) c:
c.. - 0
<J) C +::
"0 ~ ctl
ctl E ctl "0
.... ::J C
<J) e <.9 5
a; .... .c ....
en :2 ,!Q
2 ~ :0
<J) - ctl
Q5 in
o w
-
o
C
o
:.;:l
c:
o en
- ....
c: <J)
:> 2:
"0 <J)
c: en
ctl 0
<J) <(
i6 u
::
o
....
u
~
N
I
<.9
<0
'0=
()
rJ)
Q)
o
"C
Q)
>
e
E
<J)
-
en
>-
(f)
o
<(
(.)
::
<J)
c:
"0
<J)
en
'S;
<J)
c:::
en
c:
,Q
ro
en ~ "0
:g '0 <J)
ctl <J) ~
.0 a.
co ~ ;:
ro c: Gl
o <J) -
en E c:
"E a. ~
~ ::J c:
.... 0- ::J
ctl W ~
~ ,Q ....
"'0 -0 0
2:- c: ctl ....
ctl ctl c::: en
- en 0 ~
'c C _ ::J
ctl 0 en "0
en +:: <J) C
ctl OJ 0
~ ~ C U
- (.) ctl 10
~ ~ -5 S
ctl > .... :E
c..c 0"0
<J) 0 C "0
c::: (.) :2 <(
....
.E
<J)
c:
....
<J)
::
<J)
en
1.0 1.0
o 0
o 0
N N
I'- I'-
N N
~ 2:-
ctl ctl
::J ::J
c: c:
ctl ctl
-. """')
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 0 0
000 0
1.0 1.0 0 0 N N
o 0 N N
~ 0 ('i) M ~ ~
o"~N:::-~~
N N in <J) E E
<J) <J) ::J -g <J) <J)
cc:~t5~~
~ ~ <( 0 0 0
<(
Q)
-
ctl
o
....
Q)
..c
E
:::::l
Z
....
Q)
"C
....
o
Q)
C
ctl
..c
()
N
o
o
('i) oq
o 0
o 0
..-
o
o
1.0 <0 I'-
000
000
<J)
c:
<J)
(5
en
c:
o
(.)
o/:l
"0
ctl
o
c:::
<J)
>
o
U
....
<J)
-
ctl
::
en
"E
ctl
(.)
(f)
w
(.)
<(
o
o
o
.c
u
o (f) 2
<J) ~ c:"iij
:2 0 E ~ en
~ ~ & s g
'5~ +:: ctl
~ <.9 ~ 'iij <J)
_ .c ctl ffi c:
::J - 0 .... :::i
u 'S; -
"0 ~oo.Q ~
ctlc:<J)"O::,.
e .... g ~ '~
E <J) ~ ~ en
e ~ 'S; '0 ~
.... '^ w >
~.: <J) oU::
o 0 .c - Co
(jj S~:go:g
OJ+::- 0 C 0
C ctl en ~ 0 ~
"0 C ~u'iij tl
~"E c:~~!E
OJo~ 0~"'8
<J) 0 00:::: X 00::::
c::: (.) U ..::: W ..:::
en
~
ctl
::J
0-
en
-
<J)
a.
....
ctl
u
f-
o
-
en
<J)
"0
ctl
...
0)
c..
=:l
1.0 1.0
o 0
o 0
N N
co co
.... ....
<J) <J)
.0 .0
E E
~ ~
Q) Q)
o 0
(0
o
o
N
('i)
2:-
ctl
::J
c:
ctl
"""')
(0
o
0<0<0
N 0 0
0" 0 0
N N N
~ cO ..-
ctl ..- N
~ ';:: ~
ctl a. ::J
"""') <( -.
co (j) 0 ..-
00..- ..-
o 000
N ('i)
..- ..-
o 0
oq
..-
o
- (\') Il) (\')
m N ex> 0
- a r--. 0 0
c U
:::::l a ~ 0') Il)
0 c (\') .". to
E to
<(
tR-
Cl)
U "0
C e
Cl) en
"0 Cl)
.s> 0
~ w c
en
Q) Q) ....
e .!::l (ll
<C e Q)
a.
~ a... a.
a (ll (ll
- "0
c Cl)
.... Q) ....
a> .... g > (ll
"0 .E a .r::::.
15 ....
.... 0.. 0..
a Q) "0
U E (ll
e (ll ....
a> en
en Cl) .... >.
c ~ u .E e
en
m .Q 0.. m a...
L: <C m e Q)
U Q)
:!:: Q) Q) .S1
..... E u .... e
0 ~ u
.... m a...
c Q) a
0 a... ..... e
"0 a
:;::::; -- e E?
.~ m
en Q)
'C m a ><
(j :5 Cl) - a
en Q) .... (ij .0
a> Q) :::::l
0 E u... - .;:: (ij
a en Cl)
.::: Q) ~ - u
m en .;::
E -
m :::J >. 0
"0 - Q)
e - .;:: en C/)
.2 e :::::l Q) u... Ci5
en u ....
- .... Q) (ll w (ij
a "0 m Cl) e
>. -
e I (ij OJ a a
(ll :e
,2 e .... e
16 Cl) g a a "0
.... "0
u::: en ~
u 15 '5 en
.Q "0 ~
<C <C
"0
a>
>
o
....
to
o
o
N
to
o
o
N
o
N
~
:::::l
....,
to
o
o
N
o
N
~
:::::l
....,
<(
a>
-
m
o
......
N
Cl)
e
:::::l
....,
....
a>
..0
E
:::::l
Z
to
o
o
N
N
N
....
a>
"'0
....
a
a>
c
m
L:
U
-
m
:::::l
C)
:::::l
<C
-
a
m
(ll
(ij
-
a
f-
Il)
......
o
to
......
o
r--.
......
o
....
a
-
en
....
-
.~
e
'E
~
>. Q) '>..
a:J e ~.
"0 e c
Q) 0 :::::l
= ~ a
'E 0 ~
Dciij
:::::l en l/)
CJ)O<C
....
a
-
en
....
-
.~
_ e
>. Cl) .-
(OOJE
"0"0"0
Cl)a<(
> I ~
E? 1i5 C
o..E:::::l
0.._ a
<CWU
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER.
MEETING DATE: August 22,2006.
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of
July 31, 2006,
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
GOVERNMENT:
SUNTRUST/ALEXANDER KEY
SUNTRUST/ALEXANDER KEY CONTRA
SUNTRUST SECURITIES
SUNTRUST SECURITIES CONTRA
82,983,957.37
(137,749.99)
11,040,000.00
(58,777.60)
93,827,429.78
LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL:
GENERAL OPERATION (G.O.)
4,296,589.66
4,296,589.66
MONEY MARKET:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
SALEM BANK & TRUST
SUNTRUST/ALEXANDER KEY
SUNTRUST SECURITIES
SUNTRUST SWEEP
WACHOVIA
2,080,268.30
1,140,568.58
5,731,581.15
1,875,467.08
15,687,458.23
2,447,958.60
28,963,301.94
TOTAL
127,087,321.38
08/07/06
Q
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2006
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW t TH ERE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
5-\
PETITIONER: Valley Gateway, LLC
CASE NUMBER: 18-7/2006
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1, 2006 (Continued from July 10,
2006)
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 2006 (Continued from July 25,
2006)
A. REQUEST
The petition of Valley Gateway, LLC, to rezone .69 acre and .48 acre from R-1
Low Density Residential to C-2 General Commercial District in order to construct a
retail sales facility located at 4065 Challenger Avenue and 4053 Challenger
Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District. (WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE
PETITIONER)
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D. CONDITIONS
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G. ATTACHMENTS:
_ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map
_ Staff Report Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
.,.
, J
,Mattern & Craig
CONSULTING ENGINEERS' SURVEYORS
. J, Wciyne Craig
St~wart W, Hubbell
Gene R, Cress
Miellu!;!l S, Agee
Steven A. CampbE>ll
Randy W, Beckn!;!r
Wm. Thomas Austlri
Bradley C. Craig
David p, Wilson
Edwirl K. Mattern. Jr. (J 949-1982)
sam H. McGhee, m rnel1red)
July 31,2006
County of Roanoke
Department of Community Development
Planning & Zoning
P.O: Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Attn. Ms. Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Re: Application to Rezone Tax ParcellD Nos. 040.17~02-13.00-O000
& 050.01-01-05,08-0000
Valley Gateway, LLC
M&C Commission No. 2578
Dear Ms. Scheid:
On behalfofthe applicant, Valley Gateway, LLC, we hereby formally withdrawal the
request (application) to rezone the referenced property. We sincerely appreciate the efforts
of the Department of Community Development staff and the members of the Planning
Commission regarding this matter. Please contact us if you have questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
WT A/wf;j (Jaool ScheId 0607 1(),wpd) .
cc:
Roland Guyot, Valley Gateway, LLC
@
701 First Street, S,W,. Roanoke. Virginid 24016
(540) 345-9342 Fax (540) 345-7691
~~
.~
~
,,>;:.:
'?-V
c,-<'
LLC
R1
C2
Number,' 17-02 -12/13
District: Vinton Area, 0,69/0.48 Acres
~My 30,2006
'" 200'
j-d
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Victor & Elmarie Myburgh
20- 8/2006
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1, 2006
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 2006
A. REQUEST
The petition of Victor & Elmarie Myburgh for a Special Use Permit in order to
construct an accessory apartment located at 6162 Steeplechase Drive, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District. (WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER)
B. CITIZEN COMM ENTS
Mr. Myburgh briefly outlined the petition for a 990 square-foot accessory apartment
to be attached to the southwest, front corner of the existing residence he and his
wife purchased in 1997. Mr. Myburgh's parents would occupy the second-story
apartment to be built over a proposed garage. All new construction would follow the
removal of an existing carport. The petitioner stated that his family intends to live at
this location and that the entire residence including the proposed apartment would
not contain more than four bedrooms. Mr. Myburgh confirmed that one original
bedroom was converted into a small office at approximately the time he and Mrs.
Myburgh purchased the property. The following citizens spoke opposing the
request: Holly Bohn, Brown Burton, Paula Brown, Pete Lampman, Michael Dowdy,
Ronald Britt, Nancy Barker and Richard Bohn. The neighborhood concerns
included: the potential for change to the single family residential character of
Steeplechase Drive; an approval could set a precedent for similar projects;
increased density; recent septic problems in the area; visual impact; and,
alternatives exist for housing extended family that should be attempted in lieu of the
subject proposal.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Tim Beard presented the staff report. Mr. Thomason asked about the post-
construction total of bedrooms in the entire house (four), the number of additional
residents proposed (two), septic tank capacity (1000 gallons) and if the applicants
had experienced sewage problems previously (no). Mr. Thomason stated that he
saw no valid reason to refuse this request. Mr. Jarrell stated that he was concerned
with the possibility of reconverting the small office back into a bedroom. Mr. McNeil
was concerned with building height allowed. Because the addition would be part of
the principal structure, the proposed height of 26 feet, one inch is permissible - the
attached garage apartment would not have to meet the maximum height of 25 feet
for (unattached) accessory buildings. Mr. Azar stated that the proposal doesn't fit
existing neighborhood character and that other options for housing Mr. Myburgh's
parents are available.
D. CONDITIONS
1. The property shall be field staked by a surveyor to insure new construction setback
compliance prior to issuance of any building permit.
2. All new construction shall be per drawings prepared by Steve Hinrichs, AlA dated
June 8, 2006.
E. COMMISSION ACTION
Mr. Thomason made a motion to approve the special use permit request with the
recommended conditions. The motion failed on a 3-1 vote.
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
Mr. Azar, Mr. Jarrell and Mr. McNeil. Ms. Hooker was not in attendance.
G. ATTACHMENTS:
_Concept Plan
_Staff Report
_Vicinity Map
_ Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
\
6162 Steeplechase Drive
Roanoke VA 24018
817/06
Dear Mr. Beard
Thank you for your help in preparing for the application for a special use permit.
I appreciated your advice and the prompt and professional way you handled my case.
After a very amicable meeting with almost all the concerned neighbors my wife and I have
decided to withdraw our application for the S.U.P. We are looking at some alternate ways to
build an addition which is on one level and does not present an eyesore for our friends and
neighbors. We decided to forgo the kitchen because it would only be needed for such a short
time every year and we could make better use of the space for a more comfortable living room in
the addition to our home.
I have no plans yet but can assure you that once we do you will fmd them pleasing and as always
up to code. I am taking great care to avoid infractions at the building line and will have all
property lines carefully surveyed and marked before anything is built.
Thank you again for the friendly and professional service you have provided
Sincerely
v~(
Lll
Victor Myburgh
Petitioner:
STAFF REPORT
Victor and Elmarie Myburgh
Request:
To obtain a Special Use Permit for construction of an accessory apartment
Location:
6162 Steeplechase Drive
Windsor Hills
Magisterial District:
Recommended
Conditions:
1. The property shall be field staked by a surveyor to insure new construction
setback compliance prior to issuance of any building permit.
2. All new construction shall be per drawings prepared for the applicants by
Steve Hinrichs, AlA, dated June 8, 2006.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Victor and Elmarie Myburgh are requesting this Special Use Permit in order to construct an approximate
990 square-foot apartment to be attached to the front, southwest comer of an existing single family
home. The proposed apartment would replace an existing attached carport. The one-bedroom apartment
would be built over a two-vehicle garage. The property contains 0.63 acre and is zoned R-1 Low
Density Residential. The site is designated Neighborhood Conservation by the 2005 Community Plan.
The proposal generally conforms with Neighborhood Conservation policies. At 3.15 units per acre, the
proposal slightly exceeds the average R-I district density of one-to-three units per acre.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
An accessory apartment is defined by the zoning ordinance as a second dwelling unit within a
detached single family dwelling which is clearly incidental and subordinate to the main dwelling.
A special use permit from the Board of Supervisors in addition to staff review and approval from
the Health, Utility, Engineering, Fire & Rescue, Planning & Zoning departments and the
Building Commissioner is required prior to accessory apartment construction in the R-1 district.
General standards per Section 30-82-1 (B) include the following:
1. An accessory apartment shall only be considered as an accessory use to a detached single
family residence and no accessory apartment shall be located in any structure other than
the principal structure on the lot.
2. Maximum floor area: Upon completion of construction, the apartment shall not contain
more than 50 percent of the finished floor area of the principal dwelling located on the
same lot and in no case shall the accessory apartment exceed 1000 square feet.
3. Only one accessory apartment shall be allowed on anyone lot or parcel and the property
owner shall reside on the premises.
4. Exterior entrances to the apartment shall be located so as to appear as a single family
dwelling.
5. Minimum floor area of the apartment shall not be less than 300 square feet.
6. One parking space shall be required in addition to parking required for the principal
dwelling.
7. Health Department approval of sewage disposal shall be submitted prior to issuance of a
building permit for an accessory apartment.
1
Ordinance use and design standards describe the intent of accessory apartment regulations as affording
an opportunity for the development of small rental units designed to meet the special housing needs of
single persons, those with fixed or limited income and relatives of families who live or wish to live in
the county.
2. ANAL YSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background - Victor and Elmarie Myburgh purchased the subject property in 1997 per county
records. The existing split foyer residence was constructed in 1974 and stands approximately 50
feet north of and substantially below the grade of Steeplechase Drive (VA 1537) right-of-way.
The principal structure footprint includes 1,617 base square feet with an additional 1,262 square
feet in the finished lower level. The existing carport and foundation would be removed to
provide space for the proposed attached garage with second-story accessory apartment. The
apartment would accommodate Mr. Myburgh's parents.
TopographvN egetation - The site is well landscaped with deciduous trees and shrubs. Portions
of existing west side yard vegetation will be jeopardized by the proposed construction. Site
elevation drops moderately from the front, southwest lot comer in a northerly direction away
from Steeplechase Drive. The rear yard is terraced and slopes down to evergreen trees paralleling
the north boundary.
Surrounding Neighborhood - The subject parcel and all surrounding tracts are zoned R-l and
occupied by single family homes with the exception of an adjoining 1. 8 acre plot to the north.
The petitioners' property (0.63 acre) is slightly smaller most lots fronting the north side of this
segment of Steeplechase Drive and slightly larger than most lots facing the south side.
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture - The applicants propose an approximate 990 square-foot second floor
apartment to be built over a garage attached by breezeway to the front of the house. The addition
would be constructed of wood or wood grained/cement board and brick materials and would be
part of the principal building by virtue of the breezeway attachment. The apartment floor plan
includes one bedroom, great room, walk-in closet, a bathroom, utility room, kitchen, pantry and
storage area. Total height of the two-story addition is projected at 26 feet, one inch at the roof
peak per architect, Steve Hinrichs. Maximum building and lot coverage will not exceed 15 and
25 percent, respectively. Ordinance limits are 30 percent for building and 50 percent for total lot
coverage in the R-l district.
Access/Traffic CirculationlFire & Rescue - Access will continue from the existing semi-circular
paved drive. One additional vehicle is anticipated. 2003 annual average daily traffic was 600
vehicles on Steeplechase Drive per VDOT. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour at this
location. Fire & Rescue staff has no issues with this petition.
Utilities - Public water is utilized. Sewer is not available. A septic drainfield and tank are
located in the rear yard. Per county records, the house was constructed with four bedrooms. Per
the Myburghs', one bedroom was converted into an office nine years ago. The Department of
Health confirmed that the addition may be completed and remain hooked to the existing septic
system as long as the total number of bedrooms does not exceed four. Written confirmations are
on file.
2
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The subject lot and all adjoining parcels are designated Neighborhood Conservation by the 2005
Community Plan. The Future Land Use Guide advocates preserving the stability of residential
neighborhoods by discouraging the intrusion of incompatible uses and recognizes that some
reasonable increase in housing density may occur along with infill development. Further, the
Community Plan encourages the maintenance and enhancement of older neighborhoods with the
realization that these homes provide a viable source of affordable housing to the community.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The petitioners' request complies with zoning ordinance general & use and design standards. The
subject site plan proposes new construction at the minimum 3D-foot front setback required and
within two inches of the minimum la-foot side yard setback required. If the Planning
Commission makes a favorable recommendation on this petition, it is strongly recommended that
a surveyor field stake the new addition location prior to the issuance of a building permit. Please
see "Suggested Conditions" on page I of this report. Due to the scale and design proposed, the
accessory apartment should be compatible with existing homes on Steeplechase Drive. Adjacent
residents on the west are likely to be most affected in consideration of the projected building
height (estimated 26 feet, one inch). Additionally, the Myburghs' and their contractor(s) should
make every effort to preserve as much existing vegetation as possible along the southwest
property border in order to mitigate the visual impact at this location.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING
DATES:
20 - 8/2006
Timothy Beard
PC: 8/1/2006
BOS: 8/22/2006
3
Pz-- () Lr01LNc\
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Onl
Date received {;, /2 \ I () (, Received by: 'fu0
5204 Bemard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Application fee:
. a,C)\)
Placards issued:
BOS date:
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
o Rezoning )1 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (lS.2-Z232) Review
Applicants name/address wlzip \{,J 0,- ~ i:1m'\('1 ~t1,.b\l'~\-.
lo'b:.:l .5\:-~-~s-. 'h-rvL
l<o~'~~J VA ~'-IQ 1'5
Owner's name/address whip VI~Qr ~)1N~\'\e..I\)'rb,--c-.:..},
f.c 1(,; :l S~kd""j"'kJ>~ve-
1Z-:o.~" :'1kJ~f\. ~ Lfol ~
Property Location l.ol &~ 5l-e.q~
Phone:
Work:
Cell #:
Fax No.:
/7(;-D3lit3
5=D-:.:2.~4~
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No, #:
Magisterial District: j{..",~".') WI N \) SO ~ HI L.. L-S
Tax Map No,: J
OSw.() i ~0:2-3':).-=>0
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: oG3
Community Planning area:
Existing Zoning:'"'R..1
Existing Land Use~~\ ' \
0.__'- . _ ,. _ _ _ _ , __ __ _ ____ , ____ _ __, _ .
"_'::.-_:: '.'_ '_ .:,-..,'_',' :.-.. :',':.,,', .... ,.,',. :.'-.""0:. -: :'0"'_':' '_-:.,-. :'_".__ _.,'-: -::".,,, 0 '. co', .. .:,...'. _:...... : _.':
REZONING, SPECL4L USE PERJfIT, tv AlVERAND COMP PLAN (I5.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RlSIWICP)
Proposed Zoning:"K..1- ..::My
Proposed Land Use: _ ~o....
.}.~~~. '~;)~~'h~
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No
. ,
. , .,. ",. ,.
.' . ,,'-, -. - - , . .,. - - .
.,-- ,.",' ,. ,."" '". ,.'.
VARIANCE, WAIVER.4ND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA)
V ari an cetW aiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
A ppeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
RlSfWlCP V/AA R/SIWICP V/AA R/SIWICP VlAA
EE Consultation ~ 81/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee
c/' Application ~ Metes and bounds description v Proffers, if applicable
v' Justification - Water and sewer application -/ Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owper' ~or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent
of the owner. ~_ _. \. Jt . ~, ,5''::> 7- f~" ','1-1
/-Y'~ v ~H Owner's Signature
II, '~lrfybUJ~
2
" . .
,'-,,'.- ',': ,-"," ',-_. -,-.' '-,' ,',', -': -- -.- " ',' ,
J{]STIFICA TION, FOR REZONING,Sl'ECIALUSE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW,
REQUE~TS
Applicant Yi l.\:.,. ~ ti\'l'\~l-\c....- \'i\ ~ hv"'),,",
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use pennit waiver or community plan (\5.2-2232) review requests to
detennine the need and justification for the change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary,
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning ofthe applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance,
~ p\~So.~Y F'I\,A'~ W'~\ k.s\--r,d\)' ~ ..qs,r
-pp.~~~ 0(. O~~ers \.;;) \..0 -\ N'\~ ~"D ~~ ~\ ~<:; \k. Go~~\ ry
o..~'c :5\;p>"1 S;o..- e..-X\-~"'od. ~'0'o3 D\ -\-\~ ef\&.. \f'2CIr I
--n-,.'6 '\.j..~~ \.l~'~\ ~ ~~~ ,~ f\L...C..D.~"'~~G<.- ~~" ~\ l>v.:~~,~.3
o..~ ~.....\~~ ~'^'~% ~ 1h15 f\cve66.o.--y ~f'l\rl',~ u-'::'\\
~~. D-..v..~ Oo~::>e.?-\"",-:, Dl-.~~\~1 'M~~ck ~ C!H"f)I'f'I\AN~'}
bv\ v:;.,\\ '1'r-n-':'l~ L- ~Q~\~ ~ ,-\ -te....""1Y) ou:.v~p..l~ L-) ~~.-
4\~ ~~ 1f\~~\S, :',00111
Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
th/~ l'~y \5 ~ I~~~\~ ~e\~c-\x,o~ Co;~~~\O;.l b,y ~
19q9 Co,"Y\~v.t'o,.h, --:PtAr". Co........~p.~~i\A.~~" \\--~\~\,~~ ~e.\~\o--
\-.0.:.) \~ ~-\. ~-<-\~ -+0 k ;>\N \S~~"' I hiS, "'P:-n~-+y .~$" L,j,H.." N
.\-k. ~~'f'6~'~~ o~ ~k ~~o.~oo,.) ~~~~'\~'...a \.?INb ~
O-~ 5v~J...-: \ I'<<\A-~ '6e.r-.S\\'1 ~0erN\"t'\ \ s:......\'6I.\h~\.o:~ ~-e.-
o~o~ W~\...'rlo e:s\:",,~t$~~ ''R:1. '--z.n;"'\~-J-+\""::'-- ~\~ \S ~~
b~ f\ \0 ~ \ Jt.,~ ~"rs\~"" J c..~C b'l \J...~~,~ .$R.r\l"\u-::s ,
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as welI as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation and fire and rescue.
y\.-:t\\,- '-'-\.\\t~"~';) \Op.~U J .s~oo\:> Q.S4'b ~f-'\i\.--.s .sbI?> NO\ be..
~~~,~~'( \-rr-,rd-e)
3
I. CONCEJ>TPLAN CHECKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items Or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
following are considered minimum:
ALL APPLICANTS
a. Applicant name and name of development
b. Date, scale and north arrow
c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc.
f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
g. All property lines and easements
h. AlI buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
J. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
Additional information required/or REZONING andSPEClAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule
(, luff,
, Date
6
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition ifnew or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the
Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County
Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further
traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use
decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further
study is provided as part of this application paclwge).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments
and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
6/ JI.{-/vm 6
Date
\____~_____~~~~MBL
\
\
\
\
\
\
..SIOt!AllOCATJON NOT VERIFlED.
LOCW- JURISDlcnONS HAVING AUlHORrTY (JHO).
ITERm. OR IF" REQUIRED BY J.H.D.
ERUNE TO BE RO..OCATED IF REQUIRED BY NEW WORK.
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
1
1
\
\
~\
\ Q'\
~\
...,
.01
...\
\
\
\
1
\
\
) \
i I\&CO
In~
"c;o&
~I
,
\
\
\
..
.,...
.,...
,
i:o
.
o
,
c".
.
~
.'
.....
.,...
W.
?
-
------
_ _ ~~O~'40t: __
130.31'
f'
! . =-
~,
I.P. \
\
\
\
LOT 10, BLOCK 2, UAP OF SECTION 1,
HOMEWOOO. ROANOKE CO., VA
--I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
)
~\
'@'\
la\
!!?,
. \
~\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
35'-6.
1
~\
~\~
...,0
c-tlri
U1\
\
26' -0.
\
ROOF EDGE
-~~~~_:~
\
+"')t
- '-.:::>
\
\
It)
to
N
ci
.....0..
o .
E$
~...
o.
g:lt!
a
~ ..
a::~
~~
a::w
o.
.....:r:
~~
~~
00
za::
,cCHASE. OR~ .
STEE.Pu- - ~ -
----~
--------~
--=- - - - ;--=
-----
.JI --
I r
I<J
U
~
rJ~
~D:J
'-J
.f.;-.a r 1 .O-.?~
L. '-
.f6-.? ..a-.r ..O-,S 1 ..fe-.L 1 .~-. ~ ~ \
, ''-----' ~~~~-* T--~~~-JOOo-~~fSi"-J
~ I.; : ( ~ : I ~~;: t ~ t
"_'_#:~ !, -- ; I ~ - t>\t-~
~ff - J I ~_ ' ~ 15
: -~:; i 0' ~ f\ (tv ," .~ __",~:~~_.J ~ \ !
I l ~ ., Il ~ \Jj ~:r) I · I .
L ~~~ ~ ~! ~ ~....l ~ II~ : ~ s w !: \~ ~
-r-- MOl3S l,\fM I ~ r, I':... Ls:-t ~ ----' I
~ ~~l A! 0 .n_.. -~: : ~ ~ -:$' ~ ~ .tlt)\01
I J "7 : II .. 1tS t c." I ~~:.J .,
I ~ --/, - --- - ~ 1 I I" ::l ..... , ..,
~-~ ~.~ 89S::t) I I "(ro I) W ~ I W ~ ~ l~,
I" - - mOlS /~~, 11 ? I~ .1 - I I
I _'J.!___!..~_ 18.tL-.?..~.fL-.i'.~ ;":1 .fir: i ..C-.U I \!5!1 -
:; ~~--::+f~ II I -(h; I [ ~. k~ :::: ! Ii: - \
~I SL/9-L C :I}].. ;"1 -.:0. ,,,,- I ·
~I i i H iL NIl ~_ ~.j'l j I :: ~ II ~
~'<'f ~ o...Jo ('oj: Ol '4311 . - ~ <0 \
~I::.I v. (,) ~! r------ I r~ _<<",II \0 ", 101
I' ---- r.J..J , ~ I ' .or- i ~
il',j -'~ ~ 7:.., JIlIM.l ... ; I ... .::-:-ill Ii.
-r- ANIrINVlIJ. <'f ~."!..I-==--+...., 02,Q ~.~ _.a. -- ~ ~l:I~ __ ~ ,-- 9
I n I 0 I -4 .c=:-==- -~ - - - ..J ;.,
I .fen-,e..~ ..feH-,c __ I' I I
1- t-.~ _____ \.s{~ I
i u. .~~ ---r , .~"" ~
.' ~r::. =.mtJG~J~L -! ~ P
.fs-,? ..f.;-.? .fL-.s
~
:3
D:J
i : r
~ I
~
z
, l
~
\
\
,
o
I
c..
.p-.9
.~
.ta-,g
..f9-.u
>:
':"')~
,..";;,~t,~
..U-,1iI
.0- ,z: ~
.f.;- ,z:c
'I
L-J
,
\
.9-,9
.0-, L L
A'r'M3MJO
I
I
I
" I
s:- i I
1__~
'f ~,.:
a.~
em
I ~ooa "H"D g-L, X 0-6
I
I
I
I
I
L____
\"
~~
N
.
0 0
I . z
io 0 :J
I ~.
in
. ~ .
(Q IEf
I
in I
I'") ;.,.
~
'"
;"
I
~
~
'"
I
;,.
.
0 ..
..
I D
0 .
N · I')
~ I ~
1 iD
in e:
GO
. ,~-,f
0
.... .tl: .. S3SS11llJ. \1.:1 .tl: .~
I
;... I
!---- .
z~ ~
I i
......-...1
~2("l I I
I~~ I .
m" ~ c!"
N ~~~ , ,
I I ~ io
io
~. ~ I ~ ~
~G:
~
z .
co -------
.
W
--:
~ ']QIS ,o~.
.B
.8
.t '-,8
.O-,l'
.f;-,?:f
.fe-, t t
~, J.VM3M:!O
.O-,T?: ~
t-= .9-,' i
"0 "W "0 "I'f 0:
.fs-,B .[,-,6 .[,-,6 >:,
z... In
J 2:.-._ ,
-. __ uc. _1-..... _ 1
rl- __ _____ __ __ __ - _________1,___,
L._______~________~___~_.:.._~__', I 1_
" l____-!.
~____....:J
--
rn
I ]
:: ~,...
I ~ rl - - ___ - _____
I L__L__________
I I ,
rL~ I _1'1"II.._
;--V--.....
L_J
~.~-....._....
... ~ ....
..
~
~
~
t
t.t1.-.
.. -..
~!!L
~
~
00 'EAST ELEVATION
M ~r .. ".....
tI
4~
"it'
~
--~
~
IE
,..f
;*
~--
fa
.-- -.. -....
T.1l.
L3
~
.-f
~ /
I
1 1
L_______________~
--~---~-----------'
@ SOUTH ELEVATION
M ~r..1'-4l"
, I
I ~_-.,
c'=====::==':J
11
~4
t
,-ffi{
-~-
._.-'lL .
---.
---
--
.-
--
'f:' AUX. EAST E L
\!i!J ~r.. ,......
<f
...-1"-...--.....
-..--..-
--,-' ....
~ . ~ l& .... _ ..... ...
,\
I
B
.. -..
.. Ie
~ ~
~
I
..
.ll
7 ,
.. ~
~
.. T. tI.
-Y
,
~
_I~ ....
I
I I T.t1.a.w
1 r L, I,
I r---J'-----J x=~-~~~~:
I I /~--'------.../ ..--.-.,......
rL___J /
L__~~_.../'
'f:' WEST ELEVATION
\gJ ~r.. ,......
: I
rl_-~I~-.
L _ _ ---I--
I
NORTH ELE\
@
~r.. ,''''''
0-
<(
2
z
o
-
~
()
o
-'
O~ Cf)
-'
0' <.')
<(
co I-
~ 0:::
LU
>- [!)
2
Cf) :)
Z
c.9 0:::
0
Z 0
0
-
~ @
0
~li~~i
0-
<(
2
>-
l-
-
Z
-
U
0:1:
Ii:
o
z
:i1
'"
:i1
N
::i
o
I-Z
oQ
~~n~
00
cr.o
Q......l
w
~
'"
'"
>i.
o
a:
Q.
~
Cf)
Z
o
-
~
-
>
UJ
~
co
CQ
g
~
l&J I
.......1
Wl&J1
..J 0'
~zl
en It l&J ,
;1 ffil&J~1
~enf.dwl
a:: 0:: a:: a:: I
O...J~O
"000
a::
g
~ ~~
o 09
o 9~
;t mO
ffiencniJ
ffi~~~
,,050
....J
~~~~
a:: ~a:
o F=~
9 "ii
u.. z'"
...J:1-
:E:W[j]D.
cnZo_
-<!t ...
zO:;ot:
U:en~~
~el~=
ggg~
Name. Victor and Elmarie
R1
RI-
Tax Number,' 086.01-02-32.00-0000
District: Homewood Area: 0,63 Acres
~ 100'
U)
.8
ra
o
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
5-.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
August 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM:
Second reading of an ordinance amending Section 5-29.
"Same-Impoundment" of Article II. "Dogs, Cats and Other
Animals" of Chapter 5. "Animals and Fowl" to increase the daily
impoundment fee charged by Roanoke County from $8.75 to
$10.00 per day per animal
SUBMITTED BY:
John M. Chambliss
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The second reading of this ordinance as been continued until September 26, 2006, at the
request of the County Attorney.
s-y
PETITIONER: Amina AI-Hindi a/kla Amina AI-Habashy
CASE NUMBER: 15-7/2006
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1,2006 (Continued from July 10, 2006)
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 2006 (Continued from July 25,2006)
A. REQUEST
The petition of Amina AI-Hindi a/kJa Amina AI-Habashy to obtain a special use permit for
the construction of an accessory apartment on .387 acre located at 2923 Embassy Drive,
Catawba Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Ms. Suzanne Ashley, 2608 Embassy Drive, spoke in favor of the petition.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Ms. Tammi Wood presented the staff report. Ms. AI-Hindi a/kJa AI-Habashy stated that the
house would be demolished within 30-45 days with building of the proposed residence (if
approved as submitted) to begin after demolition. She acknowledged and agreed to all
conditions.
D. CONDITIONS
1. The location of the accessory apartment shall be limited to the basement of the
principal structure.
2. This special use permit shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the approval
date.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. McNeil made a motion to recommend approval of the request. Motion passed 4-0.
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G. ATTACHMENTS:
_ Concept Plan
_ Staff Report
_ Vicinity Map
Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Petitioner:
Amina AI-Hindi aka AI Habashy
Request:
Location:
To obtain a Special Use Permit for the construction of an accessory apartment
2923 Embassy Drive
Catawba
Magisterial District:
Proffered/Suggested
Conditions:
1. The location of the accessory apartment shall be limited to the basement of the
principal structu reo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request by Ms. Amina AI-Hindi aka AI-Habashy to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an
approximately 740 square foot accessory apartment within the basement footprint of their principle residence. The
property is approximately .387 acres and is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential district. The proposed accessory
apartment conforms to the R-1 Low Density Residential district zoning ordinance standards at a residential density of
one to three units per acre. The probable layout of the apartment would contain one bedroom, a study, one
bathroom and a living room/kitchen area, The site is designated Neighborhood Consel\lation by the 2005
Community Plan.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The ordinance defines accessory apartment as a second dwelling unit wtthin a detached single family
dwelling which is clearly incidental and subordinate to the main dwellfng. In the R-1 district, a
Special Use Permit from the Board of Supervisors must be granted prior to the construction of an
accessory apartment.
General standards include the following:
1. An accessory apartment shall only be considered as an accessory use to a detached single-family
residence and no accessory apartment shall be located in any structure other than the principal
structure on the lot.
2. Maximum floor area: upon completion of construction the apartment shall not contain more than 50
percent of the finished floor area of the principal dwelling located on the same lot, but in no case
shall the accessory apartment exceed 1,000 square feet.
3. Only one accessory apartment shat! be allowed on anyone lot or parcel, and the property owner
shall reside on the premises.
4. Exterior entrances to the apartment shall be located so as to appear as a single family dwelling.
5. MinImum floor area of the apartment shall not be less than 300 square feet.
6. One parking space shall be required in addition to required parking for the principal dwelling.
7. Health Department approval of sewage disposal shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building
permit for an accessory apartment
The Use and Design standards for an accessory apartment defines the intent as affording an opportunity for the
development of small rental units designed to meet the special housing needs of single persons, persons with
fixed or limited income, and relatives of families who five or desire to five in the county.
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backqround - Ms. Amina AI-Hindi aka AI-Habashy currently owns the property at 2923 Embassy Drive. On
September 28, 2005, the principle residence was burned. The Roanoke County Fire Department and the
insurance company determined the principle residence to be a total loss. Ms, AI-Hindi aka AI-Habashy is in
the planning stage of rebuilding a principle structure on the parcel. She is proposing a basement to include
an accessory apartment for a family member with physical challenges to reside,
The proposed house is one-story, 1495 square (plus a 420 square foot basement storage room) and will be
located in the center of a 220-foot deep lot. Upon completion, Ms, AI-Hindi aka AI-Habashy will reside in the
proposed house. If approved, the accessory apartment will be located in the basement of the house.
Residents of the proposed apartment would access the accessory apartment through the basement on the
rear at the house.
The Roanoke County Building Commissioner has raised concerns regarding the active violation status of
the property. The Building Commissioner referred the issue to the County Attorney for property clean up
enforcement. Ms. AI-Hindi aka AI-Habashy has been in contact with the County Attorney's office as of the
last week of May. Presently, no further action has been taken to cure problem other than minor steps to
secure the structure pending this petition.
TopoqraphvNeqetation - The site slopes down slightly from the back of the principle structure and rises
slightly at the back of the lot and has several trees located on it. Presently, there are several mature trees
as well as grass on the property. The backyard is fenced.
Surroundinq Neighborhood - In the immediate vicinity there are a variety of home sizes on lots ranging from
less than 12,000 square feet to approximately 20,000 square feet. Most houses in the Embassy Drive area
are 15 - 35 years old.
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture - The proposed accessory apartment will occupy part of the basement of the
proposed principle structure, an estimated 740 square feet including one bedroom, a study, one bathroom
and a living room/kitchen area.
AccessfTraffic Circulation/Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Public utilities, roads, schools and parks would not be
negatively impacted.
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation area of the 2005 Community Plan. An accessory
apartment is compatible with the existing neighborhood. This area is where there are established single-
family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is
encouraged. Infilllots or community re-development should be designed to be sensitive to the surrounding
neighborhood but can be at a reasonably higher density. Expansion areas are locations where the
expansion of the existing development pattern is logical.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The petitioners' request for an accessory apartment complies with all use and design standards required by
the zoning ordinance. The proposed use would not negatively impact the utilities, schools, parks, local
traffic, or the site. It would be compatible with the existing and future uses of the Neighborhood
Conservation designation of the Embassy Drive area,
If recommended for approval, the following conditions are suggested:
. The location of the accessory apartment shall be limited to the basement of the principal structure.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING DATES:
15.7/2006
Tammi Wood
PC: 7/10/06
BOS: 7/25/06
2
Pz OUO\ 500
County of Roanoke
Community Devl'lopment
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use OnIY~n
Date received: Received by:
ApplicatiDn fee:
PCifl::iOA date:
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540)772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
I '
..~
,
ALL APPLICANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
o Rewning l&:Spedal Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2.2232) Review
Apflican~ name/address wfzip, . , (1\ ~. ~ \:, c:.,..Sl ,\
/~\'Y\ I(\.C" A\~ ~"'~'- ~ . ~ 1<<
;;Z Y '7)... ""L--.. c...At...c....I....,-..J~-....a.. ......... \.-- _- -
K6C-\"'-- ~ V~~ ~ 0 t'\ C:/..!?,
Ow~er' s name/address wlziPI \" . ( C'\ i \ i \ \
A~\ ~ 0...... J\- \.- l\l\.. 'h 6J-. -t.. M ~- t+v.b Cv-~ 'r-vy
~ 'J-~ 2 h"\bG...S~ ~'.'("lCli (
~ t; Q....".. ~ ~ (PI \.J \
Property Locati Oll- ' "'-...
~ '1:L~ Ci-r, 6c0 ~ ~.
rJ
\5 ~""-~ \G.. 1 \(r\ ~L\ 6 \ 1
b~M~rc -( J .)3,00- GO
Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~.3 !?1
Phone:
Work:
Cell #:
Fax No.:
l5'-ki) g 5' 3 -;:}:S ~ <J
(5' %') ?~3 -I sl0 (::-
(s'-\Q,\
g Y ~ '~ '?:~ ~ - ~ 1 i'2J
l~~)' &,~~- JSc'fcl
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No. #:
Magisterial District: U~ +0..... Lv
Community Planning area:
Existing Zoning: K (
Existing Land Use: S, y\
\-L
+O~\l"""\.' )
~,
\.j
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN {1S,2-2232} REVIEW APPLICANTS (RJSrwfCP)
Proposed Zoning: 1\~ ~ . -Sp-<- ".::.<<1 \J..s~
Proposed Land Use: 0- <:"CUS fj ;- '"" C-<..' -t-,..,'\... Q" ~J,
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
. /y~ No IF NO, A V ARI.4NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No
VARL4NCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (VIWIAA)
Variance/Waiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal ofInterpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal ofInterpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check ifenclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE rTEMS
ARE MISSING OR rNCOMPLETE.
RlSfWlCP Y/AA RlSIWICP Y/AA FJSfWlCP V/AA :9.
~ Consultation ~ 8112" x II" concept plan ~v Application fee 40
,./ Application ,/ Metes and bounds description ,/ Proffers, if applicable ~
;/ Justification ,'/ Water and sewer applicati~t.!:j' v Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the ov.-ner of the property or the owner's a ent or con ct purchaser and am acting wi III the knowledge and consent
of the owner. "' I ~
r
Owner's Signature
j)o..r cJL 'J..-}),., 03(." f 9- 0 / -~:) j 00 ~ 0000
2
JUSTIFKA nON FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2132) REVIEW
REQUE.STS
/A. t-- H-.=.. b (}, s Iv,,;
I
TIle Planning Commission will study rezoning, special IJse pennit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary,
ArYl J \\ (;,
iLl-' tt n (l~
Applicant
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of lhe applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
-r-~'e l) t:..~rc...t\ ~ O--p QJ+IY) -€::~.J. ~>,.. C::' C; CASSO 1L1,. Lli-t l./.J./ /
De. (co "'f L. + -uJJ .r "-'" b '-U I dJ"'"1 WZoN~ rt 0"" r--<. ":' ",.j5
/-1 ~ -Fe\. Il'l ) j y rr'L ~ rn 16 ~r LV; II 0 ~1 +A.z h c>....i',,- If! -f'. ,-J-,
0.,,\ -es.-f'rY\0~cf 1Qo. -foo "s'~~LO-r~ n~, c,--",,,.-cR s!..Jr{/-Id.
~cd- (L Yl?i~v~0 ;' fYl~~-1 _ ~~ (..] {h M ':: nJ-I;j ~~. u~ 'E:--
CGtV .rz-...~ {l 'IN.. N () -€- H~ :Tr\. P \.J'd lil c +~'-CA../I:' es 6..,"~
~~~-~.R ~ ~;S'.. c.Gc~J:0r(} CLf. c~'V~-f ~II( f[I)Vtcl"'G
oJ-fo.:lc:::...6 l~ I"'\O'V-...s, r--" ~ +13 r TC_ n'l.. j,/ tY\-J(...ln b-iG. rS...
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and pDlicies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
.~ "n,~~ ~<<:....p.--'<. r v.J. ~C"...~..J ~ ~ ~ s. Cc. ''- A ~ cJ ~; c.J~ ~ > --
I i\ r.:...l'-..J..~ p r'~VI $..( 0 t...r S -tG r h-\.A,...). ~'1 F u,-- ""pa S .z... I~-e..~\' ~I\lU
-\-~ r 0..1'"\. CL_c..c..~SS01Lj o..--p G\.,...... t i'"V) -e" +. _ ~;-, r a A.... ...Ly" ,- <:'
~ 6-' ~ ~r ....1' r r,.-/I ...J
dv-~;(5fS~ J~Q.,~a.,-b,~rl'd.)ai1 'i.~}0~V{.\.--h~?f-J h' . R ~o8S
COf'nNll.A.r\.A.+L);-H(c1....(\. LGMf>C-/--f h.I'f'-J l/-J,-(l....... ~~;S--+I'(v'-C nJ 'J. I--
hood. ;~~, f\.~ 0::K~~-q{ +0 b -!Z eLn iss ""-€-. ,Jft:-tB(/tl,-o;pJ \ J Jr
~-...o..(""{'~~"1;..y- ~N: II 8~ pr~.s'G r-v--c). --rhe. p fd f?:i. c.J! bu.....~ I cf.j'NC'
~'Gcrf~,-rNt- \j...jl ~1. -f\G~ CJ-c'rV[j~ b--<.c.eJ.<..6 ~ ~ G-p'-{: (..,j.:J/ ~;d-"1- /f\
~ I crv.-'-zr ~~e is'\- 1"-.t.. ~()~,
Please describe the i.mpact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
-r-k----~p-t- Co.. r C-f'-. ~ .. 6t'~ r r 6 P-t ,t';J LIV-i ! I ',~ r-O..I0 c'- ~ ~
-Il~ "p~_~fvt() k" II . D-pf'-<_r +, _ ~ C'- s:,'~y€-,- _ fc.,,,;/,?;
r~~Nl:1L, 14 -e.K~~,-OY\ I S. -t~J. ;+ LJ( J( h4'
~ rh,~ ~d C~~O 1 N-:N 1 f r6Fv1-i -(.$.'" . ..)\"';""))'"""0 ~~\r'-.>r L:....\""\:.~
o y- p'~ t 1"<- SJ<..r v~ C;cs, , -:?I....J:,\, G- \..,ct, t .+-'~s. r rr:)(~(~ S ~t-661:;
0-(' & 1> 0-- ('" [.5" S ko LJ. &.. h. Gt I~ {VL- If _-1- ~ ve.t'1 i nr -:p C>-tj...1. ~I
3
I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered, Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request. 1n such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the. future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan Dr plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a buil ding peJmit.
Site plan and building pemit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pelmitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all remning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some oftlle items or suggest the addition ofextra items, but the
following are considered minimum:
ALL APPLICANTS
./ a, Appl icant name and name of development
v
/; d.
.j
7
f.
~g.
-/ h,
/.
- I.
V'.
_ J.
b.
Date, scale and north aiTOW
c,
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
Physical features such as ground cover, natural water'courses, floodplain, etc.
TIle zoning and land use of 211 adjacent properties
All property Jines and easements
All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, tlDor area and heights
Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets orother public ways within or adjacent to the development
Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
e,
Adriftiannl infoTlllation requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLiCANTS
./ k.
,/ L
/ m.
, n.
-
i 0,
-
,/' p.
..--- q.
Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections al the site
Any drlveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
Topography map in a suitable scale a..ld contour intervals
Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
Locations of all adj acent fire hydrants
Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule
I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete.
~ C)1ll~LL
- ~
Signature of applicant ~
(J-S-2-3 -OlP
Date
6
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION W AlVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COlV1MISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition ifnew or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the
Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff andJor an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then the PlalUlmg Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the neW or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanoke County PlaMing Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County
Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further
traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be benefIcial in making a land use
decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further
study is provided as part of this application package).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses andJor traffic impact study and to provide written comments
and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
.-cAJ-;.LflcL )<:'U:S00r~ Aa.( S L'l P
Name of Petition U
Q~ (lI '1L"L.
, Petition';r's Signature
0-5 -~3 -C~lo
Date
~~. . '0-. ".". ~''";1~.&~~~~~~~~j~~~~~i1.~,:gf~-.
~.', . ' ,': ~::. '. :~~c" ;{."~~ r ., &~-~~T' -- 'm- -,--~, ~~~ . ~ ~~ __ .. -", ~~ !i". ~.~.. '. , .:. ,,(O~~
<:1:....' ,. ~,,~ - 4:~1~ .' '* ~. ,',' r '- ~ ~;4 1~;.. t:;..< ~,:.W~ ~.'''"." i:~
-~."""-.~'-".fi:.~~ '~.' -~,~~" ,..,. ""~-,- ~Jh4~ ""~~.~~, ~~ ~~"~~
f~: ~,\~ ~4~'" ~~ .~., .' ~..
! ~~ - i-A, 'c:' . ...... "~f~. r~. ~ ~1
't~l t~~ . , T !if.'..' '.~.~~'; ~~-; 8~';" ~'l:~' .... I~. .-~. ".' If' ,: .'< i: - JJ>i
y,,:1' '~"'.l3" ~ . , ., '.-' , , 1:
'$ '" , '" .' " ih,' _" : "~" , ' ' ~ '$ ~
~. .A'~i'. r_!\'i..'-~."~7.' '. '11" f\~~'~
". . ,- . ~' ;
~ . "~ .... '~'
' '8,~..
~" A: .. , ,- . ;g.'j" . ' t#;f.
-~' . ~. :$. - , ~~
.~, '~.,.' ~-"
A 'i,~' ~', A" i'k
~" 1- ~~'. g.,' l f',-
~". f ~~ ..
i. ~... r~ d)'c?9d3 ~.
J . i~ ~ t.,: C:f;/y) bc<s< 0- M ~ ~~
. . .J",.. "i:l'?'.! ~ a ;;-. Jk ~',.'-':. ,~~~.':'. ,-,,' . '. ': ',. >
fi~~;J"~ ~~~ >, I!~~.& '
~~~~~~~~~~ ' ,?'~.
~l t40.00 ! J
I 1 -fJ "
I . O{ ~ .' .
I ',' , ~ i 1",' f ~2' ,:
i . J, i, _ ...~
:. . it ,'_ , ~~~ '--,r- . . ~': '~ ~._
~~~l-~,jJi'~~H~, _ "
ff\ .- ~~' . J j" -') 30 'It -E- I:
~ ~ ~." fl'J ~~. .
~..~< ~. .11:"~('~"i.
l" , '.~ .A', '05 --~3- 0 ~
'":t- ~. T\ cL .
---", Ht ~ I Ap+,
SLLP
~5Ai'i;:cr.:,7'~
&
,..... .
"''7
k
1"~_
i<'tt:
'"
...,s
he...
'?' '$
~
#'
~
1:. ~:
i'V.
~
~
..
"
\
~
~
(ft' ,.......,
- -'...
~. . .,
~: .. _:'~
~.. - ~
~'
, .
....~ . . .
)"11.' ,',.r"
" -"'fi;': t , ~ . .
" ',.,'.., :;~"'-'_: :;; :., .,; l~'
.~ .... .' <r -.
, ,
~i" J?!: --' .~.': ^~
~., -. . ~.~
',"".-' ~ ,~
......l ~~\t~,;,j'e
. ~'- . .
~;'~M~' . t;~ or
~.\
~ 'J
~'
~.
q,.
....
.'
, "
,~t.,
~;i.~' . ,?J;:..'~ '_~. ;....... .'
. - 'P'. . . '.
.:' ~~ "" :,,~:, ',' :-' ,
- ..... . ~..~.... '., ....
~........ ..- rr" '. "..t
. "'I j-.
~'~.'&,
~I' ;t'~ '~
~~ ",~~' :~' ," ~-"~ ,.-. ~.. ,-
~.. ,,~ ~~,... -.,
~..~.; ,~. ;i!Ji'e ~~ ..~
.. 'S?-. . .
~Jt mi ~..
UltimateP1ans,com : Home PlaIls - House Plans & Home Floor Plans - Find your dream 11... Page 1 of 3
1"'0,-,<,e pia "0 ' hOfne plans - fl(>or pl2.f1S - gafdge D!?11 ~ hClme design - i:lrchitecwre - h~USE deslg ns
_, ~$~ot'!t-..r~ ',..",' ..~J>-"'g,_ I--'.~'-'I'
~ r'iii ~,' : ?oli,:, " t~' ~~~~~~~ O\~!~_""-"'"~ f:~IC~~, p:. '. " ~
~~T~1 ~l ~J~,t! t~~~! ~1~: ;, ,.' 1~,,~~~-t~t:
Ma,ke YOUf Ulgmate: Draa.ni Home a Reality
CR..
'uo'
ti ()
MY ACCOUNT! t1Y...fAVORITES I ORDER HISTORY I F.t'
THOUSANDS OF EXCEPTIONAL HOUSE PLANS ONLINE
SEARCH AGAIN
Traditional House Plan # 221013
PRICE THIS PUU.
t\DDITIot>!ll-.l!HAGES
COST - 2 - gUILD
Logged in as: Amina A
Living Sq. Feet:,
Main Floor:
Upper Floor:
Third floor:
Basement/Lower:
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
Garage Bays:
Dimension:
Foundation Types:
Master Suite:
,
i
L-
1495
1495
o
o
o
3
2 Full, 0 He
2
48'0" 58'8"
Basemen':
Laundry:
Questions? Call 1-800-523-6
Us
Customize this plan I Ad
\J~ F~~ -+L:. ~~
~ tk"-- p ~-- ~
Ov---\:- \rc~~~-"<
~~~~
-r
~
r0'
\c--1\ \..J-t~ - Qv./-t ~.-
. d \\ f\\)
J~ -~"-- V-- ~~
~ ~ J-'J~~
--
~~~
,
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
Amina Al-Habashy: 2923 Embassy Drive, Request for Special Use Permit
" I
, I I
!
I
~'
~
[I
\ '
st-o ~\. ~ ~ -
20" x z-f ~
! p.
c--
-
\
",-
- SA-~~:6
'I&' xl/
May 23,2006
i I I I_
I I r ( ,-
\
-1(- ~I
P ,
~I
~~,.
(a'''''rte: '
//.J '/ . l:!'
1\. tCl~ eJJ....-.., , r~--..-=::
~10' X 1.2' L~.
~, f~t;,-'
I.._-~"
l,.._~ E:J
~dit r;c(B,,,t'
!;".~.; , I , __
HALL
ur ~
I
I $wt....:>
I
~
~
: 'to
:~<E.~ :.
, :;=:;k
!J'
C.t~f
(;~f
Df'TlDt./t.b
ACf1\1TY ROOM
13/ X 19'
"i
It
i;
'I
r..~ ~ '=.'~ ~:;:.=;: ~~ ,;;,~:,~~;...=;:;
;~ c_t< .~ -r-r l~ -i
LJ""-....--- ...." II f
O!'")~w I, I
BATH 'i I!
.... ........... H~",,J
~
..
6'tJra 0" fY\
16' x 11'
1/
Ii.
UltimatePlans.com : Home Plans. House Plans & Home Floor Plans - Find your dream h... Page 2 of 3
J ,
"rF !
,---n--:
c.~--{ CZ
fZ.41~~,,'"i,:.n'~~
~
....~j..\..5g
f~.t"J-j.' r\'
.;q,>-R"'
~,.;J<..~4 ~.....~
1'7,-;, :
()
----
........>
~
~,.;
~~
,;,,!
oR.. *3
JOrBo! X 10'4'1
~.~~q~~.~~~.~~~.A~
GRT# RM.,
: ci~;n}~1R~Ak. 'CEr~.$..ir
Ire" x 1~'B:"
~'
~i
~
5p-
() "
l'
,
BR~ i:Z
--p ill :i) r:,"\J..;"""'r ~
0""' SA:'~-r
2 C,AR GAR~
;:00'0 II' x 20'0"
.f:.~~l4.
M..~
;:.1.",:;;", .".,.
."~'J'......~
t '~~""'~~l'\'" \.~I:'
rA~'_-"'-~'~
1.'11,1-....
4.8'-O~
r>
"
ADDITIONAL DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
N/A
Square Footage: 1495
Unfinished Area; 1895
Level(s) : 1.0
Main Ceiling Height: 8'
Maximum Ridge Height:
20'6"
Copyright held by Designer / Architect
Exterior Wall 2x4
For more inform.
the home plans,
featu red on ou r .
cont:lct uS by eit
, u.w~
KING, FULGHUM.
SNEAD. NIXON
ol GRIMES, P.C.
........... """""'"
_n_ucq
"".,....
.- .:; .--~:: ,:-:'i/:' ::"-_._;;;-./~?~.~~~~;~~:',~,.-:
" '.~ ,",
"'-"..
;.~~
"-..,;
, -'.'~.'-
~:"''i'~ t"
. X,.-x-~~"",~__-...,~~__..
BK
5 9 8 PG 0 6 3 0
_-':.........__.~_~,lJi'C".--=".1 .~
~
iI
B
<
f
!
i
i
,
s~ (I'J
18189'mnB lJ:35
T~ Mep No.: 36.19+23
~ by W. Ben Sne!leI. Jr.
S22O-F ~ Rosel. N..W.
f:!oI:nol:.. Vronla 240 12
, THIS DEED r MADE AND ENTERED into this ;)1 <1:S- day of
D \o~ , 199~ by and bet...een Joseph D. BEAMS and Esther
A. HOUSER, Grantors, and Amina~AL-HrNDI, her heirs and assigns
forever, Grantee.
WIT N E SSE T H:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATIOn of the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00) cash, and other good and valuable considerations paid
by the Grantee to the Grantors, the receipt of which is hereby
acknOWledged the said Grantors do hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT
and CONVEY, with General Warranty and English Covenants of Title
unto' Amin~'AL-HINDI" her heirs and assigns forever I all that
certain lot or parcel of land, with all the appurtenances
thereunto belonging, lying and being in the county of Roanoke,
state of Virginia, and more particularly described as follows,
to-wit:
BEING Lo~ 11, Block lB, according to the Map
of section No.4, Montclair Estates, which
map is of ~ecord in Plat Book 7, page 10, in
1
.,-.~.zF.!'~~~~~D'~~~...____...._..--...:--",~;-....- .., .
BK \ 9 8 PG 0 6 3 \
U. '91 0!'Pi::Es
KING, FULGHUM.
SNEAD. NIXON
, &. GRIMES. P.C.
~ ...."""'"
wn.11lII:
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for
Roanoke County, Virginia.
BEING the same property conveyed unto the
Grantors by deed from G. Todd Allan and
Helen M. Allan~ husband and wife, dat~d
September 1r, 1995, recorded in Deed Book
1485, page 1459, in the Clerk1s Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
. ;4. . .
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD UNTO Am1na~AL-HI~DI, 1n fee s1mple.
THIS DEED is made subject to all recorded easements,
herein conveyed.
restrictions, reservations and conditions affecting the property
WITNESS the fOllowing signatures and seals:
~r!~
J-oseph D. BEA..'1'S
~o.~
Esther A. HOUSER
2
( SEAL)
(S EAL)
~. ~
, .
\,
1.1,~,'.
I!.
~)
:::I"
~,.,,;
~_:'
11-".
~~
~. '.';,'
r
ii
,.. ~Z
iP.-C1
'T!-~::
~t--
l.~
. :~,;.
,~~
1}t!..
~'~~
, ..,,",','
: :~
.. '2P
. o?'l~
~ 1~';.
~'-
.:. .......
~t,
~ .-;.i:
.~ 2":
_;,:1~
B';\i~'
, ',~,~,
'-, "!-
'I,",".
'-OJ';
'" .r:,o'
; .-r'
!!;{;
!~;
- .""Ji
; ':':..~
,l~
1, '..','.'.,...
. o;r~
l'~
1 \~t
. :.......
~, ~R
.r"...
~'L.r
~fi;
{~
.~
;~
,""
"'~I" -
.., " -.,'.',
i~
:;-(I:h
::t~~
"
,..
'-."j--
"\: ,:' :.:..;-: ~
. : ~,""-.~;;'
'; :-'~':. :-:"~
.. " ~:;:-: ~~,;
.:;~:;:~,~
',':'H
_n__~___.~_~~____' :;:+
~
il;,
~'
~
(;
~
f
t
I
!
,
i
;
BK I 5 9 8 PG 0 5 3 2
STATE OF \l ~"'-~U-- ,
~ OF ~ok
, to-wit:
~q
The foregoing instrument vas acknowledged before me this
O~
day of
I 199~, by Joseph D. BEAMS
and Esther A. HDUSER.
My commission expires: ~ ;I,~d-
~w.
Notllry ?u.bll.C
File '# W9810055
UW DFI'IC2S
KINO, FULGHUM.
SNEAD. NIXON
& GRIMES, P.C.
ID/.HOCI. V1W<M~
1-'0\11""
''::ONSIDERATION AMT: W$V- r1. -~:;:~;FU~'1ENT lCj;::l;::~:::?
.-.::n :::::':.:::~::'::) i:J "j :-iE CLEFi':' '; 0/:;:- IJ~l:. OJ-"
;)fl., ~"3 S-... ~ A-v=c.. ;;:C1rli ~O!(E COW HY O~.(
'ESIDENCE ADDRESS ~'.=-j- ":l::T;::::;I:;~: ~'O. : ::;r98 HT 01 :3~,f'1'1
r,RANTF.EIOESIGNEE ,;Jl(O.!!L ,;,::,(, ,IX; I~F:AJn(lF: T~::~ !,IF{;; f'~llJ i-l:j
. -:~C:I.': ':":~' [:'[ :;:(C :j::: .l-:;:Ij2 Or' fKE liP.. COD!:.
=;'::,;~; 'l:4::':.~.~~ !...OCF=il: $49.5B
:~"'~iJA : -1~1~:~~" "h ~R!~
I}-UlV ../!.~ I' tLt-t cJ'>1L _
,., - ----"Rebe~ ray- lCilrEf------- (ilL;)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT LOCATED ON
.387 ACRE AT 2923 EMBASSY DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 36.19-1-23)
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTt UPON THE PETITION OF
AMINA AL-HINDI AKA AMINA AL-HABASHY
WHEREAS, Amina AI-Hindi aka Amina AI-Habashy has filed a petition for a
special use permit for construction of an accessory apartment located on .387 acre
located at 2923 Embassy Drive (Tax Map No. 39.19-1-23) in the Catawba Magisterial
District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a pUblic hearing on this matter on
August 1, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on June 27, 2006; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 22, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Amina AI-
Hindi aka Amina AI-Habashy for construction of an accessory apartment located at
2923 Embassy Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with
the adopted 2000 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section
15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said special use permit is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
1
(1) The location of the accessory apartment shall be limited to the basement
of the principal structure.
(2) This Special Use Permit shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from
the approval date.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
2
Name: Amina A/-Hindi
R1
R1S
Tax Number: 036.19-01-23,00-0000
District: Catawba Area: 0.387 Acres
MA Y 24, 2005 Scale: 1" =200'
5-5
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Jesse Jones
21-8/2006
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1, 2006
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 2006
A. REQUEST
The petition of Jesse Jones to remove the special use permit and conditions from 1.9
acres located at 6044 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
One citizen spoke and expressed her concern that the petitioner would come back
later with a new request for a special use permit.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission discussed the procedures for resubmitting a special use permit at a
later date and the public hearing process that would be required.
D. CONDITIONS
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Jarrell made a motion to recommend approval of the request. Motion passed 4-0.
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
G. ATTACHMENTS:
_ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map
_ Staff Report Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
DATE:
July 25, 2006
SUBJECT: Petition of Jesse Jones to remove the Special Use Permit
and conditions from 1,9 acres, 6044 Peters Creek Road,
Hollins Magisterial District
On August 23, 2005, the Board of Supervisors approved a Special
Use Permit for the subject property. Although Mr. Jesse Jones was
the owner of the property in 2005, the petitioner at that time was
Vision Builders, LLC. Vision Builders was trying to market the
property for a convenience store with gasoline pumps and had
negotiated with Sheetz. Those negotiations were not successful.
Mr. Jones would now like to remove the Special Use Permit (SUP)
and conditions from the property. The SUP applies only to a
convenience store - if any other allowable C-2, Commercial use is
developed on the property, that development does not have to
conform to the SUP or the conditions attached to it. In addition, the
SUP is only valid for two years unless construction of the
convenience store use commences. One year has already
transpired, so consequently in one more year (August 2007) the SUP
and conditions would be automatically void if construction had not
begun.
If at some point in the future, Mr. Jones decides to build a
convenience store on the property he would once again have to apply
for a Special Use Permit.
The SUP issued in 2005 has the following conditions attached to it:
1. All building, including gas island canopy, exterior walls shalf
be brick, horizontal slate or vertical board and batten siding
(materials shall be either wood, fiber cement or vinyl material)
from grade to eave.
2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers,
cupola or similar designs.
3. Colors used in all exterior building materials including the
canopy will be subdued and will not be bright.
4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear,
unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14)
feet six (6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed
sixteen (16) feet six (6) inches.
5. Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no
illumination of any portion of the fascia of the canopy.
6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or
sources of light that are a part of the underside of the canopy
shall be recessed into the underside of the canopy so as not to
protrude below the canopy ceiling. All such lighting associated
with the canopy shall be directed downward toward the pump
islands and shall not be directed outward or away from the site.
7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the
fascia of such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet.
8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such
canopy shall not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the
ends or extremities of the fascia of the canopy to which or on
which they are attached.
9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to
monument style not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten
(10) feet in width, and shall be brick construction to match the
buildings. Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with
shielded lamps. Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy
less than 50/0 of the building faf;ade area.
10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15
feet.
11. Dumpster - The sides and rear of the dumpster enclosure
shall be brick construction to match the buildings.
12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of
10:00pm and 7:00am.
13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of
fifty (50) feet wide along the entire length of the northeast
property boundary. The first ten (10) feet of buffer yard, closest
to adjacent residential properties, will be left in a natural,
ungraded condition. No retaining walls shall be allowed in this
ten (10) foot area.
14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site.
15. Building(s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet.
16. Hours of operation shall be between 6:00a.m. and 12:00
midnight.
17. No access shall be allowed from Nover Avenue or Vivian
Avenue.
Petitioner is requesting that the SUP and all conditions be removed.
For the reasons stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 abover staff
recommends approving this request.
80S Public Hearing Date: August 22, 2006
r,-,<
v
"
O(fJ\l~\\
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Onl
Date received:
c,1"'Z.2IolO
Received by:
D ~ TLuJ
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
ALL APPLICANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
o Rezoning>fKSpecial Use 0 Variance D Waiver D Administrative Appeal D Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review
Applicants name/address wfzip
Jesse Jones l
570 Mirey Brand~Rd
Boones Mill VA 24065
Phone:
Work:
Cell #:
Fax No.:
S40.114-?()47
Owner's name/address wJzip
SAME
Phone #:
Wark:
Fax No. #:
Property Location
6044 Peters Creek Rd
Magisterial District:
H
Community Planning area:
Tax Map No.:
PO 26.16-2-14
Existing Zoning:
Size of parcel(s): Acres: + / - 1. 9 a c res
Existing Land Use: Va can t
REZONING,SPECIAL US,EPERMIT, WAIVER AND C()MPPLAIV (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/srw/CP)
Proposed Zoning: remove special use permi t of ordinance 082305-6
Proposed Land Use: vacant land
Does~e parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes No 0 IFNO,A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does e parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes}( No 0
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0
. -.....--.' , .
"...C.' . .''''''- ..-,' ",
.".',' .- ,-.. ,.- ",. .-' -'
VAJUA.NCE,WAlYliRAft/IjApMINISTMTlVEAP!EAL 4]>PL1CANTS(VIWIMJ
VariancetWaiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal ofInterpretation ofSection(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA TlON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
R/SIWICP V/AA IUSfWlCP VI AA IUSfW lep VIM
~f.l Consultation ~ 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan EB Application fee .
v Application - Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable - ~
V Justification - Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the pr~perty or the owner's ~r contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent
ofthe owner, / \ ".. / /',:
. /)~..-I ,'.. ,1.. i i J -"--- " , ~ 0 ' S' tu
-. ;, ,/u, 7 . .'.. I , J.. /' 7 \./ ,./ .., '-.. wner sIgna re
. L./' - - , ,-7 ./17
2
. . ' .
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPEciAL USKPERMIT WAIVER OR COMP pLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW.
REQUESTS
Applicant
,Tpssp ,Tnnps
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in tenus of public health, safety, and genera[ welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as weB as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
Previous potential purchaser encumbered property with a special
use permit by ordinance 082305-6 on August 23, 2005. Then they
did not purchase the property. Desire to have the property
unencumbered with this special use permit.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community
Plan.
Property did not previously have this special use permit
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
No impact
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22,2006
ORDINANCE REVOKING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND REMOVING
THE CONDITIONS ON APPROXIMATELY 1.9 ACRES LOCATED AT
6044 PETERS CREEK ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 26.16-2-14)
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF JESSE
JONES
WHEREAS, Vision Builders, LLC was granted a special use permit with
conditions to operate a convenience store on approximately 1.9 acres located at 6044
Peters Creek Road (Part of Tax Map No. 26.16-2-14) in the Hollins Magisterial District
by Ordinance 082305-6 adopted by the Board on August 23, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Jesse Jones, the owner of this property, has filed a petition to
remove the special use permit and the conditions placed on this property by Ordinance
082305-6; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
August 1,2006; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on July 25, 2006; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on August 22, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board REVOKES the special use permit to operate a
convenience store on 1.9 acres located at 6044 Peters Creek Road (Part of Tax Map
No. 26.16-2-14) in the Hollins Magisterial District and REMOVE the following conditions:
1
1. All building, including gas island canopy, exterior walls shall be brick,
horizontal slate or vertical board and batten siding (materials shall be
either wood, fiber cement or vinyl material) from grade to eave.
2. The store roof will have articulation in the form of dormers, cupola or
similar designs.
3, Colors used in all exterior building materials including the canopy will be
subdued and will not be bright.
4. Canopy over gas pump island - Shall have a maximum clear,
unobstructed height to its underside not to exceed fourteen (14) feet six
(6) inches and a maximum overall height not to exceed sixteen (16)
feet six (6) inches.
5, Canopy over gas pump island - There shall be no illumination of any
portion of the fascia of the canopy.
6. Canopy over gas pump island - Any lighting fixtures or sources of light
that are a part of the underside of the canopy shall be recessed into the
underside of the canopy so as not to protrude below the canopy ceiling.
All such lighting associated with the canopy shall be directed downward
toward the pump islands and shall not be directed outward or away from
the site.
7. Canopy over gas pump island - The vertical dimension of the fascia of
such canopy shall be no more than two (2) feet.
8. Canopy over gas pump island - Signs attached to or on such canopy shall
not be illuminated and shall not extend beyond the ends or extremities of
the fascia of the canopy to which or on which they are attached.
9. Site Signage - Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument style
not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feet in width, and shall
be constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy.
Freestanding signs shall be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps.
Signage placed on the building(s) shall occupy less than 5% of the
building fa<;:ade area.
10. Lighting - The top of any light fixture shall not exceed 15 feet.
11. Dumpster - The sides <=:Ind rear of the dumpster enclosure shall be
constructed of material to match the buildings and canopy.
12. Dumpster - Shall not be emptied between the hours of 10:00pm and
7:00am.
2
13. Screening and Buffering - Buffer yard shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet
wide along the entire length of the northeast property boundary.
14. No outside speaker system shall be utilized on site.
15. Building(s) height shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet.
16. Hours of operation shall be between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m.
17. No access shall be allowed from Nover Avenue or Vivian Avenue.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning AdmInistrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
3
Roanoke
of
Jesse Jones
C2S
C2
26,16-2-14
District; Hollins
Tax
12,2006