Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4/24/2007 - Regular
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda April 24, 2007 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for April 24, 2007. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturdays at 4:00 p.m. The meetings are now closed -captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Pastor David Fraser Faith Alliance Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Adoption of the School Board fiscal year 2007-2008 budget by the Board of Supervisors. (Marian Roark, School Board Chair; Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; and Penny Hodge, Assistant Superintendent of Finance) 2. Request to adopt a resolution declaring the intent to reimburse capital expenditures related to Northside High School from bond proceeds. (Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) 1 3. Request to approve fiscal year 2007-2008 budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA). (Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer; John Hubbard, Chief Executive Officer— RVRA) 4. Request to approve fiscal year 2007-2008 Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV) budget. (Elaine Bays -Simpson, Cable Access Director) 5. Authorization to commence action to abate a public nuisance at The Cellar, Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 6. Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement between the County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and New Millennium Building Systems. (Jill Loope, Assistant Director of Economic Development) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment on 0.89 acres, located at 2132 River Oaks Drive, upon the petition of Ted Alan Leneave, Catawba Magisterial District. 2. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 0.369 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-1, Office District, for the operation of a beauty salon, located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, upon the petition of Richard and Judy Taylor Wagner, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 0.844 acres from C -2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to C-2, General Commercial District, to remove proffered conditions on property located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, upon the petition of Jatin Patel, Hollins Magisterial District. 4. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology District, and to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, at the Center for Research and Technology (CRT), located near the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC, Catawba Magisterial District. 2 G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2007- 2008 budget and approval of the Classification Plan for fiscal year 2007-2008. (Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) 2. First reading of an ordinance authorizing and approving execution of lease agreements with Roanoke County Department of Social Services for office space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building at 200 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, owned by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) 3. First reading of an ordinance authorizing and approving execution of lease agreements with Lender's Leasing Corp., a Virginia Corporation, for office space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building at 200 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, owned by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) 4. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to Virginia Air Distributors and the creation of a new drainage easement through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Walrond Park, Hollins Magisterial District. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES APPOINTMENTS 1. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 2. Western Virginia Water Authority J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes—April 16, 2007 2. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate $500 from the Virginia Fire Chief's Association, Inc. for the 2007 Health & Safety Award 3 K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Accounts Paid — March 2007 5. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month ended March 31, 2007 6. Public Safety Center Building Project Budget Report 7. Public Safety Center Building Project Change Order Report 8. Claims activity for the self-insurance program for the period ended March 31, 2007 9. Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) of changes to the secondary road system for the first quarter of 2007 10. Proclamations signed by the Chairman O. CLOSED MEETING P. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room — 4t" floor) 1. Work session with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to discuss Route 221 and other County road issues. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator; Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION 12 R. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt resolution of support to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the proposed modifications to the Route 221 project. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) S. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of congratulations to the Cave Spring High School Forensics Team for winning the Lincoln -Douglas Debate at the National Forensics League District Competition 2. Certificate of recognition for Catherine White, Northside High School, for winning three State Group AA Track Championships in 2006 T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Presentation of and public hearing for the proposed budget for fiscal year 2007-2008 and the fiscal year 2008-2012 Capital Improvements Program. (Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Michael A. Wray 2. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 3. Michael W. Altizer 4. Richard C. Flora 5. Joseph P. McNamara W. ADJOURNMENT 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. �- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the School Board fiscal year 2007-2008 budget by the Board of Supervisors SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge 61R County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Board has submitted the attached budget for the 2007-08 fiscal year. The School Board approved this budget at their meeting on March 26, 2007. The budget includes a 3.5 percent increase in salary for all school employees. Marion Roark (Chairman of the Roanoke County School Board), Dr. Lorraine Lange (Superintendent of Schools), and Penny Hodge (Assistant Superintendent of Finance) will attend the Board of Supervisors meeting to present the school budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving and adopting the attached school board budget for the 2007- 2008 fiscal year. Roanoke County Public Schools Budget 2007-2008 Roanoke County Public Schools School Board Members Marion G. Roark, Chairman Catawba District Jerry L. Canada, Vice Chairman Hollins District C. Drew Barrineau Windsor Hills District William A. Irvin, III Cave Spring District Michael W. Stovall Vinton District Dr. Lorraine S. Lange School Superintendent Penny A. Hodge, CPA Assistant Superintendent of Finance David E. Atkins Budget Assistant Sandra K. Thornton Risk Management Coordinator 5937 Cove Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24019 www.res.k12.va.us t Table of Contents 10 - Executive Executive Summary Superintendent's Budget Message....................................................................... 1-2 MissionStatement....................................................................................................3 Budget Development Calendar................................................................................4 Budget Development Process.............................................................................. 5-6 Basis of Presentation................................................................................................7 Budget Summary - All Funds..................................................................................8 General Fund Revenues per Pupil............................................................................9 General Fund Revenues................................................................................... 10-11 Description of General Fund Expenditures by Budget Categories ........................12 General Fund Expenditures per Pupil....................................................................13 General Fund Expenditure Summary by Department............................................14 StudentEnrollment................................................................................................15 Historical Fund Balance Data................................................................................16 Other School Funds GrantFund.......................................................................................................18-19 NutritionFund........................................................................................................20 TextbookFund.......................................................................................................21 CapitalFund...........................................................................................................22 DebtFund...............................................................................................................23 Laptop Insurance Reserves Fund...........................................................................24 Regional Alternative Education Program..............................................................25 BusFund................................................................................................................26 `o�HTY PueC. a4"l1E'1� n,; o h CcfNi �;iel:.h.. March 26, 2007 Dear School Board Members: Roanoke County Public Schools 5937 Cove Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 The process of developing a budget each year is critically important for allocating resources to the successful operation of a first class educational program for approximately 14,800 students in the 17 elementary schools, 5 middle schools, 5 high schools, and 3 specialty schools in Roanoke County. Presented herein is the fiscal year 2007-08 (FY08) budget for Roanoke County Public Schools. Overall, the FY08 approved operating budget totals $135,091,375, representing a 6.1 percent increase over the FY07 budget. The approved budget is based on a projected average daily membership (ADM) in FY08 of 14,600 students. The FY08 budget, the second year of the state biennium budget, represents a projected state revenue increase of 5.7 percent, or $3.9 million for the school division. Additionally, the County Board of Supervisors approved an increase in county funding for the school division of 6.2 percent, or 3.6 million. The school division also projects a slight increase in federal revenue of $2,000, and an increase in other local revenues of $228,042. Overall, projected increases in state, federal, and local revenue for FY08 will significantly contribute to maintaining and improving educational services for students in the school division. Student performance, meeting the state Standards of Learning (SOL's), and accreditation under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) remain the pinnacle of achievement for the Roanoke County Public School Division. Based on the 2005-06 test results (most recent test results available), the school division continues to be a leader in student performance across the state with 100% of our schools meeting the SOL and NCLB requirements for full accreditation. Additionally, our students consistently exceed the state average on both SOL tests and Scholastic Achievement Tests (SAT). The school division also prides itself on one of the lowest dropout percentages in the state at less than one percent in FY06 (the latest year available from the state). The heart and soul of Roanoke County Public Schools lies with the employees who work with the students on a daily basis. By its very nature, public education is labor intensive and, accordingly, the emphasis in the school budget rests with personnel and benefit costs. The FY08 school budget funds a 3.5% increase in salary for all school employees along with a significant increase in required funding of the state retirement plan premiums and health and dental insurance premiums. The School Board has also funded other essential budget needs including the joint capital program with the Board of Supervisors, increases in utility costs, the laptop computer initiative which continues to provide a laptop computer to every student in grades 9 through 12, four new part-time nurses, two new special education classes, and additional staff development funds for teachers. As with all budgets, the funding is not endless and not all budget requests could be included. However, the School Board has made systematic and methodical choices to provide the highest possible salary increases within the constraints of available funding and other essential budget needs. We commend the School Board for their strong leadership and enduring commitment to providing a high quality education to the students of Roanoke County Public Schools. We would also like to thank the many parents and other citizens of Roanoke County who volunteer their time and expertise to help make our schools a safe and caring place for "learning for all, whatever it takes." Sincerely, Lorraine S. Lange, Ed. D. Superintendent Penny A. Hodge, CPA, RSBO Assistant Superintendent of Finance Roanoke County Public Schools Mission Statement It is the mission of Roanoke County Public Schools to ensure that all students participate in quality learning experiences necessary to grow, adapt and meet the challenges of a changing world. Roanoke County Public Schools believe that: • All children can learn. • The individual school controls enough variables to assure that virtually all children can be motivated to learn. • A school's stakeholders are the most qualified people to implement needed changes. • School -by -school change is the best hope for reform. "Learning for all, whatever it takes " 3 Roanoke County Public Schools Budget Development Calendar November 2006 ■ Identification and prioritization of budget initiatives based on Comprehensive Plan December 2006 ■ Budget kick-off and distribution of Budget Preparation Instructions to staff ■ Budget Development Calendar presented to School Board ■ Salary Committees begin to formulate salary recommendations ■ Preliminary revenue estimates prepared based on proposed Governor's budget Janus ■ Operating Budget Requests submitted to Finance Office by all departments ■ School Nutrition Services, Textbooks, Debt and Grant Budget Requests submitted to Finance Office ■ Draft Operating Budget compilations distributed to Senior Staff ■ Revenue projections updated based on proposed House and Senate budgets ■ Public comment on FY2008 Operating Budget February 2007 ■ Operating Budget discussions — Superintendent and Senior Staff ■ Preliminary revenue sessions with local government ■ Preliminary revenue projections updated based on General Assembly action March 2007 ■ Budget Summit with School Board and staff ■ Joint Budget Work Session with Board of Supervisors ■ Presentation of Executive Budget Summary to School Board • School Board adoption of FY2008 Operating Budget and Other Fund Budgets • School Board adopted budgets presented to Board of Supervisors April 2007 ■ Public hearings and discussions with School Board, School Staff and Board of Supervisors on Operating Budget ■ Finance Office distributes per pupil cost for public education in accordance with state law by April 15`' May ■ Board of Supervisors adopts FY2008 budget for school system 4 Roanoke County Public Schools Budget Development Process The School System budget cycle is divided into a five-step process that includes planning, preparation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation. The process is driven by two objectives: to develop a budget that will provide every child in the school system with the best possible educational opportunities and to optimize the use of available resources. Within this framework, the School Board attempts to balance the educational needs of students with the resources available to the school system from local, state, and federal sources. Budget Planning For the fiscal year that begins July 1, the budget planning process starts the prior year when the School Board adopts a budget calendar. The calendar includes important activities in the budget process and the dates on which important decisions are scheduled. Once adopted, the calendar represents the guidelines for the preparation and adoption of the budget for the school system. Preparation of the School Budget Preparation of the school operating budget includes input from each school and input from the following budget committees: Superintendent's Budget Committee Penny Hodge, Chairperson Lorraine Lange, Superintendent Bill Irvin, School Board Marion Roark, School Board Drew Barrineau, School Board Mike Stovall, School Board Jerry Canada, School Board Cecil Snead, Director of Instruction Victoria Layman, HVHS student Senior Staff BudIlet Committee Penny Hodge, Chairperson Lorraine Lange, Superintendent Allen Journell, Assistant Superintendent Tom Hall, Assistant Superintendent Cecil Snead, Instruction B J Brewer, Instruction Ben Williams, Testing and Remediation Roger Johnson, Career and Technical Ed Jessica McClung, Pupil Personnel Services Allen Journell, Assistant Superintendent Tom Hall, Assistant Superintendent Jane James, Director of Technology Sarah Hollett, RCEA Diane Hyatt, Roanoke County David Atkins, Budget and Finance Martin Misicko, Director of Operations Jessica McClung, Director, PPS/Special Ed Carol Whitaker, Personnel/Staff Development Dave Trumbower, Classified Personnel Martin Misicko, Operations Jane James, Technology David Atkins, Budget and Finance Ed Tutle, Nutrition Services Michele Dowdy, School Counseling Services Fran Kiker, School Counseling Services Brenda Chastain, School Board Clerk Darlene Ratliff, Deputy School Board Clerk Budget Adoption The budget for the school division for the next fiscal year is presented at board meetings and work sessions in February and early March. On or before April 1 of each year, the School Board adopts the next fiscal year's budget and submits to the Board of Supervisors for approval. The school division operates as a legally separate component unit. However, the school division is fiscally dependent upon the County of Roanoke with approximately 47% of the school budget funded by local taxes. The final adoption and appropriation occur in May of each year. In 2006, the school system received its first Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO) Meritorious Budget Award for Excellence in the preparation and issuance of the 2006-07 school system Annual Budget document. The award represents a significant achievement by Roanoke County Public Roanoke County Public Schools Budget Development Process Schools. It reflects the commitment of the school division and staff to meeting the highest standards of school budgeting. Budget Implementation The fiscal year begins on July 1 of each year when the newly adopted budget becomes available for spending. Department administrators receive monthly reports which reflect the budgeted amount, year to date expenditures, encumbrances, and the amount remaining for expenditure. Upon review of these reports, the administrators may request budget transfers to align the budget with their spending priorities. The board members receive monthly and quarterly reports of revenues and expenditures to date. Budget Evaluation The last step in the budget process is the evaluation of the financial plan. The results of operation for the fiscal year are reported annually in the School Board's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which is audited by a certified public accounting firm. The Superintendent's Annual School Report is also prepared annually in accordance with regulations set by the Virginia General Assembly. For the past five years, Roanoke County Public Schools has received two prestigious awards for its CAFR. The first award is the Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO). This is an international award that recognizes excellence in preparation and issuance of school system financial reports. The second award received is the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada. The Certificate of Achievement is a national award that recognizes conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. FY 2007-08 Special Considerations On February 24, 2007, the General Assembly adjourned their regular legislative session by sending a recommended budget to Governor Kaine for approval on April 4, 2007. The General Assembly budget included funding for the state share of a 1.75% salary increase for teachers. The support of the County Board of Supervisors enabled the school division to fund a 3.5% salary increase for all employees along with significant increases in the state retirement costs and health and dental insurance. M Roanoke County Public Schools Basis of Presentation The accounting system of the Roanoke County Public School division is organized and operated on the basis of self -balancing accounts which comprise its assets, liabilities, fund balances, revenues, and expenditures, as appropriate. School system resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds are as follows: General Fund The General Fund consists of the necessary expenditures for the day-to-day operations of the School System for the upcoming fiscal year. This includes costs such as teacher salaries, supplies, equipment, and other operating costs. Grants Fund The Grants Fund accounts for federal, state, and private grants to provide critical support for the instructional program, School Nutrition Fund The School Nutrition Fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures necessary to operate school cafeterias. The primary source of funding for this budget comes from cafeteria sales and federal reimbursements for free and reduced lunches. No local tax dollars are used to fund this program. Textbook Fund The Textbook Fund consists of the costs associated with the purchase of new textbooks and consumable instructional materials related to the subject area textbooks. This fund is highly subsidized by the School Operating Budget through an interfund transfer. Capital Fund The Capital Fund represents state funding for school construction and technology. Debt Fund The Debt Fund represents the payment of principal and interest for loans used to build/renovate school facilities. Insurance Reserves Fund The Insurance Reserves Fund includes the student laptop computer fees accumulated for self- insuring the equipment, warranty reimbursements, and the replacement of parts and batteries. Regional Alternative School Fund The Regional Alternative School Fund is used to account for the costs to provide an alternative educational program for students needing a non-traditional setting. This program is jointly funded by Roanoke County and Bedford County, Bus Fund The School Bus Fund accounts for school bus and support vehicle replacement. 7 Roanoke County Schools Budget Summary - All Funds FY 2007-08 Budget Budget Increase Percent Fund 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) Change General Fund Grants Fund School Nutrition Fund Textbook Fund Capital Fund Debt Fund Laptop Insurance Reserves Fund Regional Alternative School Fund School Bus Fund Total Funds General Fund 127,332,873 135,091,375 7,758,502 6.1% 5,013,800 5,123,147 109,347 2.2% 4,640,000 4,974,000 334,000 7.2% 1,302,185 1,307,185 5,000 0.4% 1,153,676 1,153,442 (234) 0.0% 9,403,876 9,500,487 96,611 1.0% 399,495 549,495 150,000 37.5% 500,437 520,437 20,000 4.0% 0 760,000 760,000 N/A 149,746,342 158,979,568 9,233,226 6.2% All School Funds 8 School Bus Fund Grants Fund School Nutrition Fund Textbook Fund Capital Fund — Debt Fund Laptop Insurance Reserves Fund Regional Alternative School Fund Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Revenues Per Pupil Total Revenues 135,091,375 100.0% 9,253 Estimated Average Daily Membership 14,600 Transfer from County Other Revenue � --Sales Tax Federal Revenue I --- State Revenue Budget 2007-08 Percent of Total Revenue Per Pupil State Sales Tax 14,872,000 11.0% 1,019 State Revenue 56,295,867 41.7% 3,856 Federal Revenue 193,213 0.1% 13 Transfer from County 62,902,796 46.6% 4,308 Other Revenue 827,499 0.6% 57 Total Revenues 135,091,375 100.0% 9,253 Estimated Average Daily Membership 14,600 Transfer from County Other Revenue � --Sales Tax Federal Revenue I --- State Revenue Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Revenues FY 2007-08 Local Revenue Actual 2003-04 Actual 2004-05 Actual 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) State SOQ Revenues Transfer from County - CSA 799,000 1,299,000 1,299,000 - - - Transfer from County - Dental 288,982 State Sales Tax 10,565,956 12,384,224 13,631,057 14,300,000 14,872,000 572,000 State Basic Aid 27,554,752 33,066,913 33,802,051 37,382,394 38,358,444 976,050 Salary Supplement 349,220 - 706,754 674,244 2,533,909 1,859,665 SOQ - Vocational Education 665,181 811,460 939,357 827,073 838,560 11,487 SOQ - Special Education 3,725,013 4,851,310 5,475,108 4,944,456 5,013,129 68,673 SOQ - Gifted Education 299,331 331,564 339,958 368,587 373,706 5,119 SOQ - Remedial Education 224,499 244,311 250,495 278,688 282,558 3,870 Retirement 913,107 1,553,117 1,807,143 2,741,926 3,181,058 439,132 Social Security 1,574,899 1,806,154 1,932,391 2,094,651 2,123,744 29,093 Group Life - - 125,859 109,377 (16,482) English as a Second Language 43,508 94,905 126,871 187,355 192,228 4,873 SOQ - Remedial Summer School 87,648 126,254 95,095 107,257 71,588 (35,669) Total SOQ Revenues 46,003,114 55,270,212 59,106,280 64,032,490 67,950,301 3,917,811 State Incentive Revenues At Risk 58,444 100,683 102,595 151,508 112,205 (39,303) Disparity: K-3 172,663 196,306 208,335 432,890 431,785 (1,105) SOL Remediation 56,284 - - - - Lottery 1,864,585 2,067,478 2,155,332 2,093,123 2,014,275 (78,848) Student Achievement Block 103,010 - - - - Total Incentive Revenue 2,254,986 2,364,467 2,466,262 2,677,521 2,558,265 (119,256) State Categorical Revenues Voc Ed -State Equipment 8,434 7,963 17,040 7,903 - (7,903) Voc Ed -State Adult Education 40,291 40,516 35,547 41,355 - (41,355) Voc Ed -State Occup/Tech Ed 108,487 102,786 100,480 105,593 154,851 49,258 Homebound Payments 40,591 20,424 19,625 1,067 32,342 31,275 Special Ed - Regional Tuition 845,127 945,839 52,101 - - - Foster Home Children 324,860 358,283 402,163 427,468 463,716 36,248 Adult Education Basic 2,138 2,138 4,277 8,392 8,392 - State Grant Revenue 1,356 70,884 81,746 - - - Total Categorical Revenue 1,371,284 1,548,833 712,979 591,778 659,301 67,523 Total State Revenue 49,629,384 59,183,512 62,285,521 67,301,789 71,167,867 3,866,078 Federal Revenue Medicaid Reimbursement 60,067 103,432 97,673 37,000 39,000 2,000 Medicaid - Administrative Claiming 23,607 24,220 53,149 - - - Federal Land Use 1,653 1,675 1,713 1,000 1,000 Federal Grants 4,360 84,364 12,418 - - Voc Ed - Carl Perkins Act 163,259 147,545 155,987 153,213 153,213 - Total Federal Revenue 252,946 361,236 320,940 191,213 193,213 2,000 Local Revenue Local Appropriation -County 55,451,357 55,071,223 57,260,071 58,813,115 62,450,497 3,637,382 Transfer from County - CSA 799,000 1,299,000 1,299,000 - - - Transfer from County - Dental 288,982 305,320 366,143 427,299 452,299 25,000 Transfer from Regional Program - - 134,080 - - - Transfer from School Capital - 127,217 - - - Total Local Revenue 56,539,339 56,802,760 59,059,294 59,240,414 62,902,796 3,662,382 10 Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Revenues FY 2007-08 11 Actual 2003-04 Actual 2004-05 Actual 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Other Revenue Interest Income 78,697 109,571 326,347 100,000 150,000 50,000 Rental of School Property 70,825 49,774 6,466 - - - Tuition - Regular School 153,893 134,686 104,114 84,700 101,769 17,069 Tuition - Summer School 119,027 96,348 87,855 92,630 97,621 4,991 Tuition - Summer Physical Ed - 5,865 6,360 - - - Tuition - Adult Education 101,750 101,777 110,670 69,667 69,667 Tuition - Preschool (LEAP) 25,000 90,910 99,964 132,840 97,200 (35,640) Other Miscellaneous Revenue 9,241 43,812 23,085 3,600 3,600 - Rebates/insurance Refunds 32 108 - - - Distance Line Refund 2,400 2,600 1,000 - - - E -rate Reimbursement 44,610 - 29,000 219,989 190,989 Alternative School Recovered Costs 55,220 36,220 17,220 17,220 17,220 - Tuition from Other Localities 24,217 26,075 7,500 8,000 8,633 633 Online High School Tuition - 44,481 67,790 61,800 61,800 - Total Other Revenue 684,912 742,227 858,371 599,457 827,499 228,042 Total General Fund Revenue 107,106,581 117,089,735 122,524,126 127,332,873 135,091,375 7,758,502 11 Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Expenditures by Budget Categories The education of students is a labor-intensive operation that is reflected in the allocation of the financial resources of the school system. For the 2007-08 fiscal year, contract salaries and fringe benefits represent 86% of expenditures in the operating budget. The major department budget areas are discussed below. Classroom Instruction expenditures deal directly with the interaction between teachers and students in the classroom. This includes the development of curriculum and instructional programs which support the standards of quality and the administration of schools and programs in compliance with state, federal, and school board mandates, policies, and guidelines. Classroom instruction also includes expenditures associated with educational testing, career education programs, special education services, homebound instruction, and guidance services. Personnel is the largest expenditure in the school operating fund. These departments include the salary and fringe benefit costs for classroom personnel, instructional and central office support staff, and school administration. Support services are expenditures related to providing transportation for regular, special, and summer school programs and the maintenance and operation of all school facilities. Central support departments include expenditures for the school board, school superintendent, budget and finance, community relations, pupil assignment, and staff development. Property insurance for school buildings, employee medical insurance, and fund transfers for debt and textbooks are budgeted under central support. Special programs capture the cost of providing summer school and adult education classes. 12 Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Expenditures Per Pupil FY 2007.08 Estimated Average Daily Membership Personnel 135,091,375 100.0% 9,253 Support Services 13 al Support Special Programs Classroom Instruction 14,600 Budget Percent Cost 2007-08 of Total Per Pupil Classroom Instruction 4,861,219 3.6% 333 Personnel 104,915,887 77.7% 7,186 Support Services 6,271,901 4.6% 430 Central Support 18,576,224 13.8% 1,272 Special Programs 466,144 0.3% 32 Estimated Average Daily Membership Personnel 135,091,375 100.0% 9,253 Support Services 13 al Support Special Programs Classroom Instruction 14,600 Roanoke County Public Schools General Fund Expenditures Summary by Department FY 2007-08 Classroom Instruction: Instructional Programs Assistant Superintendent of Administration Testing and Remediation Career and Technical Education Pupil Personnel and Special Education School Counseling Services Media Services Total Classroom Instruction Personnel: Instructional Personnel Administrative Personnel Classified Personnel Total Personnel Central Support: School Board School Superintendent Budget & Finance Community Relations Staff Development Pupil Assignment Total Central Support Support Services: Transportation Facilities & Operations Total Support Services Special Programs: Summer School Adult & Continuing Education Total Special Programs Total General Fund Expenditures Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Increase 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) 593,967 835,524 892,068 821,967 861,967 40,000 974,927 1,134,616 1,069,518 1,194,440 1,330,332 135,892 80,344 75,060 80,914 277,457 277,457 0 416,390 397,065 425,792 412,069 412,069 0 1,992,648 2,094,037 573,446 443,074 443,074 0 325,971 346,641 353,032 361,908 377,308 15,400 868,623 793,454 818,714 859,234 1,159,012 299,778 5,252,870 5,676,397 4,213,484 4,370,149 4,861,219 491,070 65,417,950 69,546,523 72,786,918 74,124,083 77,557,044 3,432,961 7,008,854 7,725,188 8,197,413 8,889,406 9,314,866 425,460 14,837,895 16,052,406 17,878,246 17,311,752 18,043,977 732,225 87,264,699 93,324,117 98,862,577 100,325,241 104,915,887 4,590,646 162,056 187,667 238,174 253,490 428,897 175,407 150,284 116,580 42,308 440,276 440,276 0 9,456,685 10,176,888 11,144,581 15,110,281 16,798,050 1,687,769 38,376 46,792 47,024 46,900 53,900 7,000 52,794 108,619 105,705 229,302 703,385 474,083 101,282 133,646 102,485 111,816 151,716 39,900 9,961,477 10,770,192 11,680,277 16,192,065 18,576,224 2,384,159 1,052,273 1,478,725 1,245,073 1,477,488 1,512,488 35,000 3,656,513 3,728,973 3,906,403 4,501,786 4,759,413 257,627 4,708,786 5,207,698 5,151,476 5,979,274 6,271,901 292,627 373,548 336,816 352,960 396,477 396,477 0 64,832 59,351 66,060 69,667 69,667 0 438,380 396,167 419,020 466,144 466,144 0 107,626,212 115,374,571 120,326,834 127,332,873 135,091,375 7,758,502 14 Roanoke County Public Schools Student Enrollment Average Daily Membership Trend 1800------ September Average Daily Annual Fiscal Year 14,500 Enrollment Membership Growth A 14,300 Q 14,200 _ 14,100 1995-96 Actual 13,753 13,721 1996-97 Actual 13,881 13,863 1.0% 1997-98 Actual 13,956 13,898 0.3% 1998-99 Actual 13,875 13,862 -0.3% 1999-00 Actual 13,852 13,856 0.0% 2000-01 Actual 13,871 13,865 0.1% 2001-02 Actual 13,911 13,930 0.5% 2002-03 Actual 14,094 14,127 1.4% 2003-04 Actual 14,385 14,279 1.1 % 2004-05 Actual 14,508 14,365 0.6% 2005-06 Actual 14,842 14,728 2.5% 2006-07 Budgeted 14,600 Average Daily Membership Trend 1800------ 14,700 - 14,600 - 14,500 14,400 A 14,300 Q 14,200 _ 14,100 - 14,000 a 13,900 15 Roanoke County Public Schools Historical Fund Balance Data Note: School Emergency Fund Balance ofSI.3M adopted by School Bd in 2006, excluded from above fund balance. 16 General School Operations Fund Balances Transfcr from County General Fund Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Annual One -Time Phase 1 Reserve for Total Increase From Percent Ended June 30 Appropriation Appropriation Capital Projects New Schools Appropriation Prior Year Increase 1988-89 26,456,000 184,294 26,640,294 1,174,294 4.61% 1989-90 28,717,090 79,912,607 28,717,090 2,076,796 7.80% 1990-91 30,576,236 1.36% 30,576,236 1,859,146 6.47% 1991-92 32,876,578 91,081,332 32,876,578 2,300,342 7.52% 1992-93 32,903,869 3.49% 32,903,869 27,291 0.08% 1993-94 34,206,283 102,259,339 34,206,283 1,302,414 3.96% 1994-95 36,733,183 800,000 37,533,183 3,326,900 9.73% 1995-96 39,647,773 1,850,000 41,497,773 3,964,590 10.56% 1996-97 42,550,097 2,000,000 44,550,097 3,052,324 7.36% 1997-98 45,865,244 1,434,815 47,300,059 2,749,962 6.17% 1998-99 46,542,839 2,000,000 48,542,839 1,242,780 2.63% 1999-00 47,941,865 2,000,000 49,941,865 1,399,026 2.88% 2000-01 49,297,791 2,000,000 1,500,000 52,797,791 2,855,926 5.72% 2001-02 52,311,049 2,000,000 1,500,000 55,811,049 3,013,258 5.71% 2002-03 55,040,790 2,000,000 57,040,790 1,229,741 2.20% 2003-04 55,920,239 2,000,000 57,920,239 879,449 1.54% 2004-05 55,418,522 2,000,000 57,418,522 (501,717) -0.87% 2005-06 57,667,370 2,000,000 59,667,370 2,248,848 3.92% 2006-07 59,240,414 2,000,000 61,240,414 1,573,044 2.64% 2007-08 62,902,796 2,000,000 64,902,796 3,662,382 5.98% Note: School Emergency Fund Balance ofSI.3M adopted by School Bd in 2006, excluded from above fund balance. 16 General School Operations Fund Balances Fiscal Year Fund Balance Ended Operating Operating as a % June 30 Budget Fund Balance of Budget 1995 71,808,432 1,326,683 1.85% 1996 76,103,239 1,250,706 1.64% 1997 79,912,607 1,122,274 1.40% 1998 83,928,863 1,144,086 1.36% 1999 87,233,241 1,951,696 2.24% 2000 91,081,332 2,475,202 2.72% 2001 95,277,499 3,322,436 3.49% 2002 98,162,402 4,008,278 4.08% 2003 102,259,339 4,190,156 4.10% 2004 110,986,972 3.670,525 3.31% 2005 112,448,453 5,385,687 4.79% 2006 118,007,240 6.282.978 5.32% Note: School Emergency Fund Balance ofSI.3M adopted by School Bd in 2006, excluded from above fund balance. 16 Roanoke County Public Schools Other School Funds 2007-2008 Roanoke County Public Schools School Grant Fund Revenues FY 2007-08 State Grants: Actuals 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 Actuals 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Federal Grants: 74,152 77,305 86,771 77,305 128,570 51,265 Title 1, Part A 952,703 1,050,313 1,083,443 1,062,853 999,481 (63,372) Title II, Part A 228,078 232,246 245,705 355,400 355,762 362 Title 1I, Part D 20,538 271,928 19,425 35,000 14,536 (20,464) Title 111 25,186 12,981 48,851 42,283 37,139 (5,144) Title IV, Safe & Drug Free Schools 53,670 57,358 49,693 53,000 37,865 (15,135) Title V, Part A 25,375 55,172 34,399 31,476 15,054 (16,422) Title VI -B Flow-Thru Funds 2,555,350 2,589,573 3,070,607 2,941,001 2,961,732 20,731 Preschool Mini Grant- 1 yr 97,505 92,889 92,254 95,113 91,376 (3,737) Preschool Mini Grant - 2 yr - 82,531 10,490 - - - Assistive Technology 1,966 - - Sliver Grant 25,460 30,361 36,374 Reg Tech Ed Training - - - 11,842 11,842 Refugee - Child School Impact 5,744 8,399 451 Dual Enrollment 3,991,575 4,483,751 4,691,692 4,616,126 4,524,787 (91,339) State Grants: Early Reading Initiative 74,152 77,305 86,771 77,305 128,570 51,265 Algebra Readiness 98,994 34,942 32,966 49,172 69,743 20,571 Tech Prep - Continuation 100,169 104,955 GED Funding 15,717 15,717 15,717 15,717 15,717 - High Schools That Work - WBHS 12,095 7,851 6,828 7,500 10,000 2,500 High Schools That Work - CSHS 10,960 6.370 6,966 7,500 10,000 2,500 Preschool Initiative 103,766 223,037 255,837 237,367 270,447 33,080 School by School 5,450 6,573 - - - - VisuallyHandicappedGrant 3,067 4,360 4,107 3,113 4,106 993 Learn & Serve 21,201 12,397 59,888 - - - Mentor Teacher 19,283 20,696 17,191 Standards of Learning 68,022 26,684 14,831 Regional Tech Ed 28,082 24,897 15,657 Supplemental Technology - - 20,215 Dual Enrollment 13,967 308 71,191 - Community Needs - GOSAP 34,252 23,287 - Tobacco Settlement 91,254 74,999 75,000 Drug Free Communities 25,163 74,793 - Special Ed Pilot - WBHS 45,000 - Universal Services Fund - 43,698 - - Adult Basic Education - 89,777 89,777 VCA Fine Arts - 1,500 1,500 - - 770,594 740,671 728,363 397,674 598,360 200,686 Other Grants: Leap Program 123,669 Penn Forest Playground 700 Oracle Academy 1,000 - Parent Fair - - 1,520 State Farm - 5,000 - 125,369 5,000 1,520 - - - Total Grant Revenues 4,887,538 5,229,422 5.421,575 5,013,800 5,123,147 109,347 18 Roanoke County Public Schools School Grant Fund Expenditures FY 2007-08 State Grants: Actuals 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 Actuals 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Federal Grants: 74,152 77,305 86,771 77,305 128,570 51,265 Title 1, Part A 951,997 1,050,309 1,083,442 1,062,853 999,481 (63,372) Title 11, Part A 244,810 232,245 245,705 355,400 355,762 362 Title 11, Part D 20,538 271,928 19,419 35,000 14,536 (20,464) Title 111 8,501 13,026 44,629 42,283 37,139 (5,144) Title IV, Safe & Drug Free Schools 53,670 57,358 49,693 53,000 37,865 (15,135) Title V, Part A 25,375 55,172 34,399 31,476 15,054 (16,422) Title VI -B Flow-Thru Funds 2,555,350 2,589,572 3,070,672 2,941,001 2,961,732 20,731 Preschool Mini Grant- I yr 97,505 92,889 92,254 95,113 91,376 (3,737) Preschool Mini Grant - 2 yr - 82,531 10,490 - - - Assistive Technology 1,966 20,696 - Sliver Grant 25,460 30,361 36,374 - - Reg Tech Ed Training - - - 11,842 11,842 Refugee - Child School Impact 5,744 8,399 451 - - Dual Enrollment 3,990,916 4,483,790 4,687,528 4,616,126 4,524,787 (91,339) State Grants: Leap Program 49,318 53,162 Early Reading Initiative 74,152 77,305 86,771 77,305 128,570 51,265 Algebra Readiness 98,994 34,942 32,966 49,172 69,743 20,571 Tech Prep - Continuation 100,169 104,955 - - - - GED Funding 15,717 15,717 15,717 15,717 15,717 - High Schools That Work - WBHS 12,095 7,851 6,828 7,500 10,000 2,500 High Schools That Work - CSHS 10,960 6,370 6,967 7,500 10,000 2,500 Preschool Initiative 103,766 223,037 255,837 237,367 270,447 33,080 School by School 5,450 20,073 - - - - Visually Handicapped Grant 3,067 4,360 4,107 3,113 4,106 993 Learn & Serve 21,201 12,397 59,888 - - - Mentor Teacher 19,239 20,696 17,191 Standards of Learning 68,022 26,684 14,831 Regional Tech Ed 28,079 24,897 15,660 Supplemental Technology - - 20,215 Dual Enrollment 10,014 28,101 60,098 Community Needs - GOSAP 34,252 23,287 - Tobacco Settlement 91,253 75,000 75,000 Drug Free Communities 25,163 74,793 - Special Ed Pilot - WBHS 45,000 - Universal Services Fund - 43,698 - - Adult Basic Education - 89,777 89,777 VCA Fine Arts - 1,500 1,500 - - 766,593 781,965 717,274 397,674 598,360 200,686 Other Grants: Leap Program 49,318 53,162 6,340 Penn Forest Playground 1,317 - - Oracle Academy 1,000 Parent Fair - - 1,514 State Farm - 5,000 - 51,635 58,162 7,854 - - Total Grant Expenditures 4,809,144 5,323,917 5,412,656 5,013,800 5,123,147 109,347 19 Roanoke County Public Schools School Nutrition Fund Revenues and Expenditures FY 2007-08 Expenditures: Salaries & Related Costs Contractual Services Travel Food Supplies Supplies Equipment Unappropriated Total Expenditures Beginning Balance Ending Balance Meal Prices: Elementary lunch Secondarylunch Reduced price lunch Adult lunch Full priced breakfast Adult breakfast Reduced breakfast Reimbursement Rates: Federal - paid meal Federal - reduced price meal Federal - free meal State reimbursement 2,238,414 2,327,363 2,382,501 58,382 Actuals 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 Actuals 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Revenues: 2,149,426 51,574 51,478 59,670 18,687 37,289 Pupil, Adult & Other Sales 3,107,286 3,365,149 3,630,443 3,500,000 3,750,000 250,000 Rebates & Refunds 444 3,723 4,704 4,000 4,000 - State Reimbursement 62,944 62,158 72,160 75,000 75,000 - Federal Reimbursement 854,964 973,388 1,219,889 1,053,000 1,125,000 72,000 Interest Income 3,967 6,950 23,057 8,000 20,000 12,000 Other Income 980 2,020 1,199 - - - Total Revenues 4,030,585 4,413,388 4,95],452 4,640,000 4,974,000 334,000 Expenditures: Salaries & Related Costs Contractual Services Travel Food Supplies Supplies Equipment Unappropriated Total Expenditures Beginning Balance Ending Balance Meal Prices: Elementary lunch Secondarylunch Reduced price lunch Adult lunch Full priced breakfast Adult breakfast Reduced breakfast Reimbursement Rates: Federal - paid meal Federal - reduced price meal Federal - free meal State reimbursement 2,238,414 2,327,363 2,382,501 58,382 63,550 57,120 9,071 14,180 16,453 1,648,393 1,858,729 2,149,426 51,574 51,478 59,670 18,687 37,289 39,127 2,541,000 2,591,000 50,000 65,000 65,000 - 8,000 18,000 10,000 1,910,000 2,050,000 140,000 - 70,000 70,000 50,000 80,000 30,000 66,000 100,000 34,000 4,024,521 4,352,589 4,704,297 4,640,000 4,974,000 334,000 401,526 407,590 468,389 - - 407,590 468,389 715,544 - - FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 0.75 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Breakfast Lunch $0.24 $0.23 $1.01 $2.00 $I.31 $2.40 none $0.05 20 Roanoke County Public Schools School Textbook Fund Revenues and Expenditures FY 2007-08 Expenditures Salaries & Related Costs Actuals Actuals Actuals Budget Budget Increase Instructional Materials 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) Consignment Textbooks 733,492 458,072 526,449 1,075,521 812,233 (263,288) Revenues: 82,763 192,354 255,668 - 315,000 315,000 Sale of Textbooks 15,858 11,173 35,165 40,000 45,000 5,000 Rental of Textbooks 3,810 - - - - - Other Revenue 39,961 14,499 5,401 4,000 4,000 - State Reimbursement 626,600 550,746 564,688 913,039 913,039 - Transfer from School Operating Fund 310,146 384,794 345,146 345,146 345,146 - Total Revenues 996,375 961,212 950,400 1,302,185 1,307,185 5,000 Expenditures Salaries & Related Costs 58,428 62,185 65,271 80,864 89,952 9,088 Instructional Materials 24,999 139,923 25,000 30,800 25,000 (5,800) Consignment Textbooks 733,492 458,072 526,449 1,075,521 812,233 (263,288) Non -Consignment Textbooks 82,763 192,354 255,668 - 315,000 315,000 Laptop Computer Equipment - 187,523 115,000 115,000 65,000 (50,000) Total Expenditures 899,682 1,040,057 987,388 1,302,185 1,307,185 5,000 Beginning Balance 118,838 215,531 136,686 - - - Ending Balance 215,531 136,686 99,698 - - - Scheduled Adoptions: FY2008 - Literature, English 6 - 12, World History, Government, World Languages FY2009 - Literature, English 6 - 12 FY2010 - Elementary Language Arts 21 Roanoke County Public Schools School Capital Fund Revenues and Expenditures FY 2007-08 Expenditures: Actuals Actuals Actuals Budget Budget Increase 22,104 - - 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) 4,194,144 1,920,570 864,000 864,000 - Land & Building Improvements 13,502,707 6,861,265 4,176,516 289,676 289,442 (234) Issuance Costs Revenues: - - - - - Transfers to Other Funds 666,122 798,130 - - - - Interest Income 124,910 94,822 59,338 - - - Other Income 12,938 12,924 957,002 - - - Soft Drink Commission 50,000 75,550 60,000 60,000 60,000 - State Technology Bond 830,000 804,000 804,000 804,000 804,000 - State Construction Grant 275,548 282,315 282,220 289,676 289,442 (234) Proceeds from VPSA Bonds 22,000,740 - - - - - Transfers from Other Funds 3,737,408 4,592,239 5,317,753 - - - Total Revenues 27,031,544 5,861,850 7,480,314 1,153,676 1,153,442 (234) Expenditures: Salaries & Related Costs 41,792 38,817 22,104 - - Contracted services 329,615 297,719 283,645 - - - Equipment 1,952,119 4,194,144 1,920,570 864,000 864,000 - Land & Building Improvements 13,502,707 6,861,265 4,176,516 289,676 289,442 (234) Issuance Costs 75,785 - - - - - Transfers to Other Funds 666,122 798,130 - - - - Total Expenditures 16,568,140 12,190,075 6,402,835 1,153,676 1,153,442 (234) Beginning Balance 5,043,327 15,506,731 9,178,506 - - - Ending Balance 15,506,731 9,178,506 10,255,985 - - 22 Roanoke County Public Schools School Debt Fund Revenues and Expenditures FY 2007-08 Actuals 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 Actuals 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Revenues: Principal on Literary Loans 884,032 884,032 850,032 850,032 Transfer from General Fund 5,963,795 8,048,555 7,433,677 7,092,007 6,784,688 (307,319) Transfer from School Fund 2,445,472 2,304,369 2,304,369 2,304,369 2,715,799 411,430 Total Revenues 8,409,267 10,352,924 9,738,046 9,396,376 9,500,487 104,111 Expenditures Principal on G. O. Bonds 475,000 485,000 510,000 525,000 540,000 15,000 Principal on Literary Loans 884,032 884,032 850,032 850,032 826,632 (23,400) Principal on VPSA Bonds 3,632,623 4,709,639 4,573,152 4,481,603 4,449,988 (31,615) Principal on Lease Purchase Agreements 116,629 - - - 244,848 244,848 Interest on G. O. Bonds 188,781 179,281 159,831 149,631 133,181 (16,450) Interest on Literary Loans 286,327 259,636 232,945 207,274 181,603 (25,671) Interest on VPSA Bonds 2,801,401 3,835,336 3,412,086 3,182,836 2,957,653 (225,183) Interest on Lease Purchase Agreements 4,473 - - - 141,582 141,582 Bank Service Charges 5,400 5,900 5,900 7,500 25,000 17,500 Payment to Refunding Escrow - - - - - - Total Expenditures 8,394,666 10,358,824 9,743,946 9,403,876 9,500,487 96,611 Beginning Balance (121) 14,480 8,580 7,500 (7,500) Ending Balance 14,480 8,580 2,680 - 23 Roanoke County Public Schools Laptop Insurance Reserve Revenues and Expenditures FY 2007-08 Expenditures: Actuals 2003-04 Actuals 2004-05 Actuals 2005-06 Budget 2006-07 Budget 2007-08 Increase (Decrease) Revenues: - 9,668 10,226 - 33,148 33,148 Interest Income 790 3,836 16,843 - - - Fees from Students 121,378 217,831 320,811 376,995 376,995 Lost/Damaged Parts 250 9,312 14,836 20,000 20,000 Insurance Deductible Paid by Students - - - 2,500 2,500 - Warranty Reimbursements 12,980 112,330 181,810 - 150,000 150,000 Total Revenues 135,398 343,309 534,300 399,495 549,495 150,000 Expenditures: Salaries & Related Costs - 9,668 10,226 - 33,148 33,148 Miscellaneous Operating (Bags) 26,262 56,477 27,304 51,000 51,000 - Supplies 3,801 4,602 - - Small Equipment (batteries) - 76,900 111,304 131,250 131,250 Small Parts - Students 1,002 24,523 32,029 30,000 30,000 Small Parts - Teachers - 4,554 2,264 6,000 6,000 - Laptop Network Security Software - - 20,000 - 40,000 40,000 Equipment - 85,998 - 76,852 76,852 Laptop Insurance Reserve - - 181,245 181,245 - Total Expenditures 31,065 176,724 289,125 399,495 549,495 150,000 Beginning Balance - 104,333 270,918 - Ending Balance 104,333 270,918 516,093 24 Roanoke County Public Schools Regional Alternative School Fund FY 2007-08 Expenditures: Actuals Actuals Actuals Budget Budget Increase 278,522 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) - - 500 500 - Communications 46 290 Revenues: 600 600 - Lease/Rent of Equipment - - - Department of Education Grant 71,925 76,254 77,835 86.973 97,685 10,712 Roanoke County Tuition 164,307 169,564 169.564 192.232 196,876 4,644 Roanoke County Transportation - - - 19,000 19,000 - Bedford County Tuition 126,307 150,564 179,322 192,232 196,876 4,644 Bedford County - SAP - - - 10,000 10,000 - Total Revenues 362,539 396,382 426,721 500,437 520,437 20,000 Expenditures: 9,761 10,916 12,511 13,011 8,215 Salaries and Fringe Benefits 278,522 346,724 391,262 442,074 462,074 20,000 Purchased Services 26,000 - - 500 500 - Communications 46 290 - 600 600 - Lease/Rent of Equipment - - - 2,150 2,150 - Travel 570 969 508 800 800 - Office/Medical Supplies 2,696 1,761 1,815 1,600 1,600 - Small Equipment - - 1,603 2,100 2,100 - Janitorial Supplies - 863 1,500 1,500 - Uniforms 1,793 - - - - - Instructional Materials 6,208 4,484 4,372 10,893 10,893 - Transfer to Roanoke County: Transportation 38,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 - Property Insurance 620 620 620 620 620 - Utilities 16,600 16,600 16,600 18,600 18,600 - Total Expenditures 371,055 390,448 436,643 500,437 520,437 20,000 Beginning Balance 33,019 24,503 30,437 - - - Ending Balance 24,503 30,437 20,515 - Total Cost Per Student Roanoke County Cost Per Student 9,276 9,761 10,916 12,511 13,011 8,215 8,478 8,478 10,562 10,794 W, Roanoke County Public Schools School Bus Fund FY 2007-08 Expenditures: School bus replacements Support vehicle replacements Total Expenditures Beginning Balance Ending Balance 781,515 1,317,506 686,638 725,000 725,000 - - - - 35,000 35,000 781,515 1,317,506 686,638 - 760,000 760,000 861,062 1,386,721 803,757 - - 1,386,721 803,757 849,919 26 Actuals Actuals Actuals Budget Budget Increase 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 (Decrease) Revenues: Interest Income 7,174 10,583 11,728 - - Sale of Machinery & Equipment - 23,959 21,072 - Transfer from General Fund 1,300,000 700,000 700,000 760,000 760,000 Total Revenues 1,307,174 734,542 732,800 - 760,000 760,000 Expenditures: School bus replacements Support vehicle replacements Total Expenditures Beginning Balance Ending Balance 781,515 1,317,506 686,638 725,000 725,000 - - - - 35,000 35,000 781,515 1,317,506 686,638 - 760,000 760,000 861,062 1,386,721 803,757 - - 1,386,721 803,757 849,919 26 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. [ ;I-_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt a resolution declaring the intent to reimburse capital expenditures related to Northside High School from bond proceeds SUBMITTED BY: Diane Hyatt Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge a,. County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The adopted School Board capital improvements plan includes the renovation and expansion of Northside High School in the amount of $24,000,000. The Board adopted a resolution approving the application for literary loan funding in the amount of $7,500,000 for this project on November 15, 2005. This project is expected to be placed on the first priority waiting list in June 2007, with possible funding in November 2007. In addition to the literary loan funding, the remainder of the project costs will be funded with Virginia Public School Authority bonds (VPSA). The next VPSA bond sale is scheduled for Fall 2007. However, construction will begin on Northside High School in June 2007. In order to begin construction prior to the bond sale and file for reimbursement after the VPSA bond sale, the Board of Supervisors must adopt the attached reimbursement resolution. The scope of work has been defined to include a new administrative/guidance area, new kitchen and cafeteria, new roof, new HVAC mechanical system, hook-up to public water system, new finishes throughout the interior/exterior of the building, new student lockers, new auditorium, eight additional classrooms, air conditioning in the gymnasiums, and new locker rooms. The entire project will be put out to bid in April and will begin construction in June 2007. The completion date for construction is scheduled to be January 2009. Staff will return in a few months with the action needed from the Board of Supervisors to approve the VPSA bond sale. FISCAL IMPACT: The project costs will be reimbursed with either literary loans or VPSA bond proceeds. The debt service on these borrowings is included in the planned drawdown of the future debt service reserve fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution that declares the intent to reimburse the capital expenditures for the Northside High School project with bond proceeds. 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF ONE OR MORE FINANCINGS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of County of Roanoke, Virginia, (the "County") has determined that it may be necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, renovating, constructing, and equipping certain capital projects for public school purposes, consisting primarily of the renovation and improvement of Northside High School (the "Project"). NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made orto be made by the County or the School Board to pay the costs of acquiring, renovating, constructing and equipping the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued in one or more series for the Project (in addition to $7,500,000 for which the Board of Supervisors has approved an application to the Virginia Literary Fund) is $16,500,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: April 24, 2007 Request to approve fiscal year 2007-2008 budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Office Elmer C. Hodge 16/"4 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On March 28, 2007, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) adopted an operating budget for FY 2007-08. As specified in the RVRA's members use agreement, the charter member users must now approve this budget before it can be placed into effect. In a letter, dated March 28, 2007, the chief executive officer of the RVRA submitted the attached approved budget for consideration by the charter member users. The budget totals $9,353,719 and represents a slight increase of 6.4 percent from the current FY 2006- 07 budget. A significant portion of this increase is due to an increase in the annual deposit into the closure reserve fund, in order to adequately fund this reserve. This budget includes a 4 percent salary increase and does not include any new personnel. The RVRA Board will revisit the actual salary increase prior to implementation to take into account the salary increases given by the charter member users. The tipping fee for charter members will remain at $45 per ton, and the tipping fee for commercial users will remain at $55 per ton. The budget utilizes $926,499 of the general surplus fund to balance the budget. The general surplus fund currently has a balance of $5,976,041, which is $4,328,041 more than currently needed. The use of $926,499 in the FY 2007-08 budget is intentional in order to bring the reserve down to a more reasonable level. The use of general surplus fund balance is planned through the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Mr. John Hubbard, Chief Executive Officer of the RVRA, will be at the meeting to present the budget request. FISCAL IMPACT: The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority budget will impact the County in several ways: 1. Tipping fees for charter members will remain the same. 2. The County will continue to receive a municipality fee of $300,000 annually for the RVRA to compensate for the siting of the landfill within the County. The City of Roanoke also continues to receive a municipality fee of $100,000 to compensate for the siting of the transfer station. 3. The County will receive payment from the RVRA of $18,000 during FY 2007-08 for providing accounting services. All of the above fiscal impacts are included in the FY 2007-08 proposed County budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the operating budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the 2007-08 fiscal year. K ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY March 28, 2007 Ms. Diane Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Childers: E0LE0aC D MAR 0 0 2007 In accordance with the Member Use Agreement, the Resource Authority is submitting its 2007-2008 annual budget to the Board of Supervisors for approval. Enclosed are copies of the 2007-2008 budget for each member of the Board. A copy of the budget, along with the attached letter, have been sent to Mr. Hodge, requesting that he initiate action for approval of the budget by the Board of Supervisors. If you have any questions or if you need additional copies of the budget, please let me know. Your help with this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, John R. ubbard, P.E. Chief Executive Officer cc: Diane D. Hyatt 1020 Holfins Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (540) 857-5050 Fax (540) 857-5056 Web Site: www.rvra.net k ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY March 28, 2007 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Hodge: On March 28, 2007, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority approved its 2007/2008 annual budget. The budget totals $9,353,719 and represents an increase of 6.4% from the current 2006/2007 Budget. The tipping fee rate for Charter Members and commercial users remain the same. The Resource Authority continues its efforts to provide the most economical service possible while maintaining contract obligations and high quality service to the Roanoke Valley. This proposed budget is a reflection of those efforts. In accordance with the Member Use Agreement, the Resource Authority's 2007/2008 annual budget is being submitted for the Board of Supervisor's approval. Attached is a summary of the budget, a comparison of the budget and the bond projections. A detailed budget is available, if additional information is needed. The Resource Authority is committed to serving the residents and businesses of the County of Roanoke and other Charter Members, and we look forward to continued success. Sincerely, Anne Marie Green Vice Chair 1020 Hollins Road Roanoke, Virginia 2401.2 (540) 857-5050 Fax (540) 857.5056 Web Site: www.rvra.net �b®AN®KF VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY TINKER CREEK TRANSFER STATION BOARd of D/RECTORS, STAff ANd COUNSEL Board of Directors Bittle W. Porterfield III Chair The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Board of Directors is comprised of seven members appointed by the charter member Anne Marie Green, Vice Chair jurisdictions. Four members represent County of Roanoke Roanoke County, two members represent Roanoke City and one member represents the Town of Vinton. The Authority Board Diane D. Hyatt, Treasurer is governed by its Articles of Incorporations, County of Roanoke Bylaws and the Members Use Agreement. Keith Tensen County of Roanoke Robert K. Bengtson City of Roanoke Kevin S. Boggess Town of Vinton Suzie Snyder County of Roanoke *************** Staff The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is John R. Hubbard directed by a Chief Executive Officer with Chief Executive Officer 29 employees. Deborah T. Charles Board Secretary Counsel *************** The Resource Authority receives legal Mark A. Williams, Esq. counsel through a contract with the Roanoke General Counsel Regional Airport Commission. Rnannlra V.11— Racmmra A„fh. At- 2007-2008 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority $ S \Y Operating REVENUE 3,581,905 2007-2008 Disposal Fees $ 7,821,500 Interest Income $ 557,720 Transfer from General Surplus $ 926,499 Sale of Recyclable Material $ 22,000 Miscellaneous $ 26,000 Transfer - Rutrough Road $ - Per Ton $55 Total $ 9,353,719 EXPENSES Personnel $ 1,601,810 Operating $ 3,581,905 Capital $ 4,500 Transfer to Reserves $ 1,410,000 Debt Service $ 2,755,504 Total $ 9,353,719 r�IcN ri�n n I rCCO vIJrFL-L-a Municipal Per Ton $45 Private Per Ton $55 2007-2008 BUDGET 1 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Si 1\IMARY eUI/' E RMNUE 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Disposal Fees $ 6,727,925 $ 6,719,800 $ 7,260,200 $ 7,255,240 $ 7,401,700 $ 7,821,500 Interest Income $ 700,000 $ 446,340 $ 371,340 $ 371,340 $ 482,720 $ 557,720 Transfer from General $ 800,000 $ 876,329 $ 875,310 $ 860,885 $ 783,555 $ 926,499 Surplus Sale of Recyclable $ 24,000 $ 30,000 $ 31,000 $ 24,000 $ 26,000 $ 22,000 Material Miscellaneous $ 18,000 $ 19,500 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 26,000 Transfer - Rutrough Road $ - $ - $ 62,665 $ 67,205 $ 68,065 $ - TOTAL $ 8,269,925 $ 8,091,969 $ 8,628,515 $ 8,606,670 $ 8,790,040 $ 9,353,719 EXPENSES Personnel $ 1,378,030 $ 1,390,008 $ 1,516,632 $ 1,581,987 $ 1,618,535 $ 1,601,810 Operating $ 2,758,413 $ 2,747,717 $ 2,871,757 $ 3,078,558 $ 3,251,186 $ 3,581,905 Capital $ 193,500 $ 20,000 $ 312,600 $ 15,000 $ 3,000 $ 4,500 Transfer to Reserves $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,410,000 Debt Service $ 2,779,982 $ 2,774,244 $ 2,767,526 $ 2,771,125 $ 2,757,319 $ 2,755,504 TOTAL $ 8,269,925 $ 8,091,969 $ 8,628,515 $ 8,606,670 $ 8,790,040 $ 9,353,719 DISPOSAL FEES Municipal $ per ton 42 42 45 45 45 45 Private $ per ton 55 55 55 55 55 55 % INCBLEASE -0.6% -2.2% 6.6% -0.3% 2.1% 6.4% in expenses 2007-2008 BUDGET 2 II 1; gid) OR 11a 1:;1 1 11 14 aSO V 2007-2008 BUDGET FY2007-08 BUDGET 0 100,700 10 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,700 0 $ 7,821,500 0 $ 557,720 0 $ 48,000 5 $ 926,499 5 $ - 0 $ 9,353,719 6 $ 2,912,815 5 $ 1,875,400 1 $ 4,788,215 9 $ 4,565,504 9 $ 2,755,504 0 500,000 400,000 10,000 $ 410,000 $ 400,000 5nn, nnn 3 0.1815 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 45.00 $ 55.00 2007-2008 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource A RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY Adopted this 28th day of March, 2007 No. RA2007-472 A RESOLUTION approving the Authority's annual budget for fiscal year 2007-2008 and authorizing submittal of such budget to the governing bodies of the Charter Member Users for approval. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority that: 1. The fiscal year 2007-2008 Annual Budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the report and accompanying attachments by the Operations Manager dated March 28, 2007, and submitted to this Board is hereby approved; 2. The Authority Chairman is authorized on behalf of the Authority to submit the fiscal year 2007-2008 annual budget and related documents to the governing bodies of the Charter Member Users, being the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton, for approval in accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement, dated October 23, 1991, as amended. On the motion of Ms. Hyatt to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Bengtson, Mr. Boggess, Ms. Green, Ms. Hyatt, Ms. Snyder, Mr. Tensen NAYS: ABSENT: Mr. Porterfield ATTEST: zz�&� 06-bo-rah'f.arles RVRA Board Secretary AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority members use agreement provides that the authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 28, 2007, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 2007-2008 budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the fiscal year 2007-2008 budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the March 28, 2007, report of the Authority Chief Executive Officer, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby approved, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F_- y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve fiscal year (FY) 2007-2008 Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV) budget. SUBMITTED BY: Elaine Bays -Simpson Cable Access Director APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge �� County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton jointly operate Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV, Channel 3). The initial equipment and facility for the television studio were funded through a capital grant from Cox Communications. The station is located at the Jefferson Center and currently employs five full-time staff members. The staff produces original video productions, monthly television shows, and covers live government meetings for the local governments and their school systems. Programming is cablecast on Cox Communications, Channel 3 and Comcast, Channel 3 in the West County area. RVTV is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the City, the County, and the Town. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three governments based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. The governing bodies have informally agreed to provide up to 20 percent of the franchise fee paid by Cox Communications to fund the operations of the facility. Roanoke County's share of the cable budget is 43 percent. RVTV staff is carried on the County's payroll and benefit system and will receive the same salary increase as County employees. During 2006-2007, Roanoke Valley Television produced a total of 106 video productions for the three localities and their school systems. RVTV produced 45 original videos and television shows and covered 23 live Board meetings for the County. A few examples of RVTV productions include: (1) the BG US Challenge, (2) a T.E.K. Camp highlight video, and (3) Roanoke County Schools specialty centers. RVTV produces monthly the television shows "Roanoke County Today," which highlights local government issues and events and "Accent Excellence," for the Roanoke County School System. The approximate rate for video production in the private sector is $1,500 per finished minute. RVTV produced 954 minutes (15 hours & 54 minutes) of original programming and television shows for the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The total RVTV budget request is $339,711 of which Roanoke County's share is 43 percent, or $146,076. This is a $7,374 increase (5.3 percent) from last year's budget. The increase excluding personal services (VRS, health insurance, salaries, etc.) is $2,759. The total franchise fee paid by Cox Communications to Roanoke County last year was $896,454. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative 1: Adopt the FY 2007-2008 RVTV operating budget (attached). Alternative 2: Do not adopt the FY 2007-2008 RVTV operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee recommends that the Board adopt Alternative 1, and approve the FY 2007-2008 RVTV operating budget. 2 Roanoke Valley Television ROANOKE VALLEY TELEVISION 2007 - 2008 Operating Budget Proposal RVTV 2006 Edited Video Productions Title Client Length Roanoke Public Works City of Roanoke 5:30 Vinton Public Safety (Broadcast Version) Town of Vinton 23:00 Vinton Public Safety (Rescue Squad) Town of Vinton 10:00 Vinton Public Safety (Fire Department) Town of Vinton 15:00 Vinton Public Safety (Police Department) Town of Vinton 6:00 TEK Camp Highlight Video County of Roanoke 8:00 Vision Film Festival PSA City of Roanoke :30 8 Step Problem Solving City Schools 10:30 Vinton Student Government Day Town of Vinton 14:00 Teacher of the Year Highlight Video City Schools 15:00 (2) Smart Way Bus PSAs City of Roanoke :30 ea. "Inside Roanoke" Promo City of Roanoke :30 "Roanoke County Today" Promo County of Roanoke :30 "Roanoke County Business Partners" Promo County of Roanoke :30 Citizens Appreciation Day Highlight Video City of Roanoke 28:00 (2) Recycling PSAs City of Roanoke :30 ea. Citizen of the Year PSA City of Roanoke :30 D.A.R.E. Camp Highlight Video City of Roanoke 9:00 Know Your Hazards City of Roanoke 30:00 4 Step Plan — Emergency Preparedness City of Roanoke 12:00 Flexible Leave Plan County of Roanoke 16:00 Convention & Visitors Bureau (Updated) City/County/Town 7:30 Western VA Water Authority (Water Leaks) City/County 9:00 Dispatcher Recruitment City of Roanoke 9:00 Book Festival Highlight Video City of Roanoke 11:30 Parks & Rec. Programs PSA County of Roanoke :30 RVTV Informational Video City/County/Town 4:30 Severe Weather Video City of Roanoke 30:00 State of the County Address County of Roanoke 30:00 2 Title Roanoke County Schools Address (2) Earth Summit PSAs Teacher of the Year Video BG US Challenge State of the City Schools Address State of the City Address City Investiture Ceremony Specialty Centers Video Roanoke County Career Center Organizational Video School Board Appreciation Video Camp Fair PSA ESL Library PSA Employee Recruitment PSA (5) Focus On Safety (4) Libraries In Action Total Minutes Produced Client Length County Schools 12:00 City of Roanoke :30 ea. City Schools 6:30 City/County 18:30 City Schools 53:00 City of Roanoke 30:00 City of Roanoke 55:00 County Schools 8:30 County Schools 11:00 County Schools 6:30 City Schools 5:00 County of Roanoke :30 City of Roanoke :30 City of Roanoke :30 County of Roanoke 6:30 ea. City of Roanoke 6:30 ea. 575 Minutes (9 Hours & 35 Minutes) The approximate rate for Video Production work in the private sector is $1,500 per finished minute. RVTV produced 575 Minutes (9 hours & 35 Minutes) of Stand Alone Video Productions in 2007 which totals $862,500 in Production Value. 2006 Television Shows Total Title Client Time 12 Inside Roanoke City of Roanoke 30:00 each 12 Roanoke County Today Roanoke County 30:00 each 12 Spotlight On City Schools Roanoke City Schools 30:00 each 12 Accent Excellence Roanoke County Schools 30:00 each 3 Roanoke County County of Roanoke 30:00 each Business Partners 3 Total Productions Total Productions City of Roanoke Roanoke County Town of Vinton 106 56 45 5 Percentage 53% 42% 5% 2006 Government Meetings Totals Meetings 24 Regular City Council Meetings 23 Regular Board of Supervisors Meetings 1 Board of Supervisors — Special Funding (March 21S) 1 City Council Budget Meeting (April 27th) 1 Senior Citizen Law Day (September 14t) 1 County Planning Commission Meeting (October 3`d) RVTV additionally covers many Groundbreakings, News Conferences, and Special Events Groundbreaking Vinton EMS Building Cox Communications Expansion Announcement Valley Metro New Fleet Ceremony RR Donnelley Expansion Announcement Family Kite Festival Roanoke Valley Book Festival Renaissance Faire 125th City of Roanoke Anniversary Proclamation Groundbreaking Western Virginia Regional Jail RVTV Proposed 2007 - 2008 Budget Total $322,563.00 $3399711.00 $164,027.46 49.15% Increase From Last Year: $17,148 or 5.3% Increase Excluding Personal Services (Health, Dental, VRS, Salaries etc.) From Last Year: $2,759 RVTV expended 99.99% of its FY2005-2006 Operating Budget * Year to Date Expenditures For the 06 Month Period Ended 12/31/06 5 2006-2007 Budget Proposed *Remaining % 2007-2008 Balance Expended 1010 Regular 177,965.00 185,733.00 88,240.95 50.42 (Actual 179,452 + 3.5%) 2100 FICA (Employer 7.65%) 13,615.00 14,209.00 7,005.38 48.55 2200 Retirement - VRS (13.55% of Salary) 22,998.00 25,167.00 10,939.20 52.43 2202 Deferred Comp Match (650 x 4) 1,950.00 2,600.00 975.00 50.00 2300 Group Health Insurance (+7.3%) 17,045.00 20,399.00 6,778.16 60.23 (Actual 19,011) 2310 Group Dental Insurance (+5%) 956.00 858.00 481.52 49.63 (Actual 817 - 4 Employees) 2400 VRS Life (1.13% of salary) 2,172.00 2,099.00 1,158.24 46.67 2500 Long Term Disability Insurance 0 350.00 -55.56 3013 Professional Services - Other 27,500.00 27,500.00 15,993.73 41.84 (Closed Captioning, Dubbing etc.) 3204 Repairs Vehicles (By Garage) 800.00 400.00 659.75 17.53 3209 Repairs (Other Equipment) 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0 3305 Maintenance Service Contracts 1,850.00 1,600.00 1,566.74 15.31 (Telephone & Non -Linear Editing) 5210 Postage 150.00 175.00 143.94 4.04 5230 Telephone 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,593.38 35.17 5235 Cellular Phones 480.00 480.00 328.54 31.55 5236 Pager Services 243.00 0 209.40 13.83 5305 Motor Vehicle Insurance 1,300.00 1,300.00 384.00 70.46 5308 General Liability Insurance 2,121.00 2,333.00 53.00 97.50 5410 Lease/Rent of Equipment 500.00 500.00 500.00 0 5420 Lease/Rent of Buildings 34,590.00 35,630.00 179466.24 49.51 (8 x $2,939.58 4 x $3,027.76) 5501 Travel (Mileage) 200.00 200.00 107.66 46.17 5520 Dinner Meetings & Luncheons 200.00 200.00 63.50 68.25 5801 Dues & Association Membership 278.00 278.00 278.00 0 6010 Office Supplies - General 600.00 600.00 238.87 60.19 6013 Small Equipment & Supplies 2,700.00 2,700.00 1,553.81 42.45 6014 Video Supplies 41700.00 6,700.00 3,370.57 28.29 6080 Gas, Oil & Grease 1,250.00 1,500.00 959.68 23.23 6091 Tires 400.00 200.00 33.76 91.56 Total $322,563.00 $3399711.00 $164,027.46 49.15% Increase From Last Year: $17,148 or 5.3% Increase Excluding Personal Services (Health, Dental, VRS, Salaries etc.) From Last Year: $2,759 RVTV expended 99.99% of its FY2005-2006 Operating Budget * Year to Date Expenditures For the 06 Month Period Ended 12/31/06 5 RVTV Financial Report Current Account Balances as of January 31, 2007 213200 (Operating Budget)................................................................. $141,333.94 213300 (Cox Cable Capital Grant) ...................................................... $34,719.85 213450 (New Cox Cable Capital Grant) .............................................. $902,054.00 213500 (RVTV Year -End Rollover Account) .................................... $155,871.97 The third, and Final Capital Grant payment of $230,000 is due on or before Nov. 1, 2008. Account 213500 (RVTV Year -End Rollover) represents the unused funds from the Operating Budget since 1991. RVTV does not lose these funds at the end of the fiscal year, rather they are rolled over into this savings account which will be used for future capital purchases. E Cox Communications 2006 Franchise Fees Cox Communications paid a 5% Franchise Fee to the local governments in 2006 Calendar Year which totaled $2,051,056. The local governments have informally agreed to allocate up to 20% of the Franchise Fees collected to the RVTV Operating Budget. For the coming year, that amount would be $410,211. RVTV is requesting an Operating Budget of $339,711, which is $70,500 less that amount. Cox calculates the percentage of subscribers (December 31, 2006) in each locality as follows: Locality Subscribers Percentage City 29,366 52% County 24,475 43% Vinton 2,610 5% Total 56,451 100% Based on those figures, each locality's contribution to an Operating Budget of $339,711 would be as follows: 2006 — 2007 Budget 2007 — 2008 Budget City $167,733 $176,650 County $138,702 $146,076 Vinton $16,128 $16,985 Total $322,563 $339,711 7 To: Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee From: Elaine Simpson, Cable Access Director Date: April 5, 2007 Re: FY 2007-2008 Operating Budget Proposal BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke Valley Television, RVTV Channel 3, is a government & educational access station serving the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, the Town of Vinton and their respective school systems. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three governments, based on the proportion of Cox Customers located in each jurisdiction. Currently, RVTV employs five full-time staff members. The staff produces original videos, monthly television shows, and covers live government meetings. RVTV produced the following for 2006 — 2007: • 51 Original Television Shows (12) Inside Roanoke, (12) Roanoke County Today, (12) Spotlight On City Schools, (12) Accent Excellence, (3) Roanoke County Business Partners • 58 Government Meetings (24)Roanoke City Council, (23) Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and others • 55 Original Video Productions Examples include: Vinton Public Safety, Roanoke County Career Center, BG US Challenge, Emergency Preparedness, Teacher of the Year, Dispatcher Recruitment Additionally, RVTV covered numerous special events including ground breakings, dedication ceremonies, and news conferences. RVTV produced a total of 106 video productions last year for the three localities and their school systems. The approximate rate for video production work in the private sector is $1,500 per finished minute. RVTV produced 55 original video productions for a total of 575 minutes (9 hours & 35 minutes) which totals $862,500 in production value. RVTV also produced 51 original TV shows for a total of (25 hours & 30 minutes). 1 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed RVTV FY 2007-2008 operating budget is $339,711 which is a $17,148 (5.3 percent) increase over last year's budget. The increase excluding personal services (health, dental, VRS, salaries, etc.) is $2,759. RVTV staff is carried on the County's payroll and benefit system and will receive the same salary increase and insurance costs as other County employees. As suggested by Mr. Brent Robertson, County Budget Director, I have included a 3.5 percent salary increase for budgetary purposes. The Group Health Insurance line item was increased by 7.3 percent. The Group Dental Insurance line item was increased by 5 percent. Our current rent is $2,939.58 per month. Beginning March 1, 2008, the rent will increase to $3,027.76 per month. The proposed budget includes funding for closed captioning services for both the City Council and Board of Supervisors meetings. The video supplies line items was increased from $4,7000 to $6,7000 to support our transition to the digital recording & playback of City Council & Board of Supervisors meetings. RVTV expended 99.99 percent of its FY 2005-2006 operating budget. FISCAL IMPACT: The total RVTV budget request is $339,711 which is a $17,148 increase from last year or 5.3 percent. The increase excluding personal services (health, dental, VRS, salaries etc.) is $2,759. Cox Communications paid a 5 percent franchise fee to the local governments in the 2006 calendar year which totaled $2,051,056. The local governments have informally agreed to allocate up to 20% of the franchise fees collected to the RVTV operating budget. For the coming year, that amount would be $410,211. RVTV is requesting an operating budget of $339,711, which is $70,500 less that amount. 2 Cox calculates the percentage of subscribers (December 31, 2006) in each locality as follows: Locality Subscribers Percentage City 29,366 52% County 24,475 43% Vinton 2,610 5% Total 56,451 100% Based on those figures, each locality's contribution to an operating budget of $339,711 would be as follows: 2006— 2007 Budget 2007 — 2008 Budget City $167,733 $176,650 County $138,702 $146,076 Vinton $16,128 1 16,985 Total $322,563 $339,711 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C- 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to commence action to abate a public nuisance at The Cellar, Brambleton Avenue SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: J. D. Brown, Inc. is a Virginia corporation holding a business license for "The Cellar" located at 3203 Brambleton Avenue in Roanoke, Virginia. John A. Cronin, Jr. is the owner of this real estate. After an investigation conducted by Roanoke County agents, it has been determined that a public nuisance exists at this property. A public nuisance is "any act or activity the causing or maintaining of which is such an inconvenience or troublesome manner as to annoy, injure, or damage the public at large or a substantial portion of the community or a considerable number of persons, and from which any resulting damage is not specifically apportionable to any one member of community" (§13-14 (a) (5), Roanoke County Code). The County has received the following complaints from neighboring or adjoining property owners: (1) Noise disturbances late at night. A "noise disturbance" means any sound which (a) endangers or injuries the safety or health of any person; (b) annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities; or (c) endangers or injuries personal or real property (§13-18, Roanoke County Code). In addition, there are complaints of specific actions constituting noise disturbances, namely, loud, amplified music after the hour of 10:00 p.m. at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible across property boundaries or plainly audible at 50 feet from the property (§13-21 (5). (2) Cursing and fighting by either patrons or employees of The Cellar in the parking lot to the rear of the building. (3) Epithets shouted at the neighbors. (4) Trash thrown into neighboring yards from The Cellar property including beer bottles, pizza boxes, and used condoms. (5) Property damage to neighboring property done by patrons or employees of The Cellar. (6) Threats of retaliation by patrons or employees made against complaining neighbors. By letter dated April 2, 2007, the corporation holding the business license and the owner of the real estate were given notice of these facts and were given 10 days to submit to the County Attorney a plan of action to abate this nuisance. The general manager of The Cellar and the attorney for the real estate owner have responded. The general manager has listed the steps taken by him to address these problems; the attorney for the owner has requested additional time to respond, since the tenant is out of town due to a family illness. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the Board authorize the County Attorney to continue to work with the corporation, general manager, and owner of the real estate to abate this nuisance. If these efforts are unsuccessful, then the Board is requested to authorize the County Attorney to commence appropriate action in circuit court to abate this nuisance. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I- Ln AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement between the County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and New Millennium Building Systems SUBMITTED BY: Jill Loope Assistant Director Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge &e'� County Administrator Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: New Millennium Building Systems, a subsidiary of Indiana -based Steel Dynamics, Inc. is a steeljoists manufacturer located on Diuguids Lane in West Roanoke County. Purchased in April of 2006, the former John W. Hancock manufacturing operation is undergoing a major renovation and expansion. The 108,000 square foot expansion will include approximately $20 million in new equipment and real estate investment and the retention of up to 175 jobs. Steel Dynamics' other subsidiaries located in Roanoke City and the City of Salem are also undergoing expansions as a result of the recent acquisition. John W. Hancock, founder of Roanoke Electric Steel maintained a manufacturing presence in the Roanoke Valley for over 61 years. The Company has a long and distinguished history in the region, and has manufactured steel joists in Roanoke County for over 31 years. Following the acquisition of the John W. Hancock facility by Steel Dynamics, the company has decided to not only maintain their operations in the Roanoke region, but they have also chosen to make significant investments and expand their operations here instead of placing this investment in one of their many other locations. To assist with their expansion, a three -party performance agreement has been negotiated between Roanoke County, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and New Millennium. This agreement will promote and encourage the expansion and retention of this important company and provide increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke. The agreement allows for an economic development grant in an amount equal to three years of new local tax revenue to be reimbursed to the company after the new facility is built. New local tax revenue is defined as new real estate and machinery and tools taxes generated annually by the project, not to exceed to $500,000 in total. This is consistent with the County's public private partnership policy. If the company generates less than the estimated new local tax revenue, then the actual grant for that year shall be less. The three-year period will commence on January 1, 2008. FISCAL IMPACT: Per the performance agreement, the grant will be calculated as a reimbursement based on new tax revenues generated by the project; therefore, the fiscal impact will be in the form of foregone revenue. No new funding is needed for this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the execution of a performance agreement between the County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, and New Millennium Building Systems. ON PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT THIS PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of this 24th day of April, 2007, by and between ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "County"), the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "Authority"); and JOHN W. HANCOCK, JR., LLC dba NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, a Virginia limited liability corporation, (hereafter, the "Company") WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley through the construction of new business and the retention and expansion of existing business in order to provide for retained and increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Company, desires to construct an expansion to its existing facility (the "Project") located at Duiguids Lane in Roanoke County (the "Property"), and WHEREAS, the County and the Authority expect that the Company will maintain its high quality employment opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley with the completion of this Project which will promote economic development and generate new local tax revenues for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, this maintaining of existing employment and the increase in capital investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 1. Site Development by the Company. A. The Company will cause this new Project in Roanoke County to be made and developed, subject to obtaining ordinary and necessary governmental approvals from the County, and any other governmental agency. B. The Company shall on or before December 31, 2007 (i) construct an approximate 108,000 square foot expansion to its existing facility with a construction cost of at least $9.5 million on the Property, and (ii) install new equipment therein with a value of at least $9.8 million. C. The Company agrees to provide the County and the Authority any and all documentation that may be reasonably required to verify the investment and employment figures for the duration of this Agreement. 2. Procedures for the reimbursement of Authority funds to the Company. A. Beginning in calendar year 2008, the County shall appropriate to the Authority in three annual installments sums sufficient, for an Economic Development Incentive Grant for the benefit of the Company. These sums sufficient amounts will equal a total of three years of "New Local Tax Revenues." The term, "New Local Tax 2 Revenues," means the total of net new local real estate taxes and machinery & tools taxes generated annually by the Project. The total amount of the Economic Development Incentive Grant shall not exceed $500,000. If the Project generates less than the estimated New Local Tax Revenues, then the Grant shall be less than the estimated total of $500,000 for all three years. Such payments will be made over a three (3) year period in accordance with this Agreement. The three-year period will commence on January 1, 2008. B. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar year beginning January 1, 2009, and continuing through December 31, 2011, the Company shall provide such employment, financial and tax revenue data relating to the Project as may be reasonably required by the Authority so that the Authority may calculate the actual grant amounts. It is the County's intent that the company maintains 175 jobs through December 31, 2011. The Company hereby authorizes the Commissioner of the Revenue for Roanoke County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to release to the Authority and the County, the Company's confidential tax information and data so that the Authority may calculate the actual reimbursement amounts, with the County and the Authority to hold such information in confidence. The Authority, with funds appropriated by the County, shall pay the annual reimbursement amount to the Company at an address designated by the Company within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Authority of the data. C. If the Company terminates this Project or fails to complete the construction of this development by December 31, 2007, then the Authority shall be 3 relieved of any obligation to the Company for any Economic Development Incentive Grant. 3. The Company shall have the right to assign this Agreement to a separate entity provided that any such assignment shall not relieve the Company of its obligations herein. 4. If any party is unable to perform its commitments under this Agreement by reason of force majeure, then that party shall not be deemed to be in default of its obligations under this Agreement, and any deadlines for the performance of its obligations and, if applicable, the deadlines for the performance of the other party's obligations shall be extended for a time equal to the time period of the force majeure event, plus ten days. The term a "force majeure" as used herein, shall include without limitation acts of God: hurricanes, floods, fire, tornadoes, earthquakes, storms; strikes or other industrial disturbances; acts of public enemies; orders of governmental authorities; insurrections; riots; epidemics. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by and all disputes related hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 6. This Agreement and any payments of public funds are subject to future appropriations by the Board of Supervisors to the Authority. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. 4 Approved as to form: By Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Approved as to form: By Attorney for EDA STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY Chairman The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of '2007, by Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., on behalf of the Board of Supervisors for Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2007, by _ , Chairman of the Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: —/_/ 5 JOHN W. HANCOCK, JR., LLC dba NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS Its: STATE OF ) )ss COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2007, by , as John W. Hancock, Jr., LLC dba New Millennium Building Systems. Notary Public My Commission expires: —/—/ day of of rel ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances; consent agenda SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge 641 -- County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for May 22, 2007. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: The petition of Ted Alan Leneave to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment on 0.89 acre, located at 2132 River Oaks Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. 2. The petition of Richard and Judy Taylor Wagner to rezone 0.369 acre from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-1, Office District, for the operation of a beauty salon, located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. The petition of Jatin Patel to rezone 0.844 acre from C -2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to C-2, General Commercial District, to remove proffered conditions on property located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 4. The petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC, to rezone 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology District, and to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, at the Center for Research and Technology (CRT), located near the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: That the Board approve and the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second readings and public hearings for May 22, 2007. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1 through 4, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date received: - Received by: ication fee: PC44Z-A 1n, On Placards issued: I BOS Case Number LA A.) r, ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) []Rezoning (Special Use ❑ Variance []Waiver ❑Administrative Appeal []Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: ��{O - S2 -k --0-I56- A LAO to 0EAvc Work: 114 - 4 7.to3 Z137. oAW-S Jlz%vL- Cell #: — SZt -1615 - 5ALr,&-,� , \J4 2-g•W 5-S Fax No.: 174 - 0180 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: $AME A-5 AgoVL) Fax No. #: Property Location Magisterial District: C7'At-113Pt 2132 M2�`\tLtZ �'+K-S DWZIVL Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: 050,0-1-04-Z.g.00-0000 Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: Existing Land Use: S\t.NG-7t rt4�-k\.L �l}><►�1rJAw�C� REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (]s.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: �1- 5?f LtAL VS& ►�E1ZJ'-lT Proposed Land Use: kcx-t5sotz`j f4t�At2-'Co•�LIJT Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes .-' No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) t.I `� of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA [EqConsultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds descriptionff Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant -�-t-D 'A'L-0't3 The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. ��tts tZ,—csuuT t S -rte �/c"�tUA�o�.� c julca f �vL- 51-c- 3d-SSZ-I Ne CX-LSSAAy APR 2i�E�tS. sp-c- 30-%Z--J(M f4FFVaDs AtJ Toe\JG -6e Arm ActLSSr4�Y pr1�Dc�LTl�E1.1T Foe _�?itLSD't-ZS wtZH FLYS-D u1Z- V,1-A-lt to tNcut LL P�Nu 1ZeL.A-RVFi ol= t=A. �lrlt� WF}� >_%V L c+Yt D7✓S1121 'CO LlUi 1N -Mi [-uuN't`( -rv-rc- ""A74LTMEO gi F;0rL -L'k-F[--- VSE -Cr: " iL N?.Jo by `LZ-AAZ c3L.0 PNevaTS Tkbk--c of I�EE�I TFtE -01F- IFVK'eD Pt t-�Q . Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. -THt 4C-v�tt S-ea-��t.2.OS st'�e-tFttt�w t� Sf_e- A-5 etn-"Ws , 1) -CYC- 1,) Wt \ Wk&) C'hc t7A-L- S,W,a4*A&F- S't%WC_tve-fes (wk�-ouT 6As4,��az�, Z� ��t•�«�'4� a,,� �wt�, �S AF'PP.C)Ktr-t Z�( 'avd s0Z'JD- -i W\ta-k tS '-ESS - wrw-a 7,Nke 1POD A' -Tv !;-00/" 3i too oTCtC P- Pet-t-ILSSAR.Y P4t'A�ZT '"CSS 4� TttE A?p a-7Cct-7%eq zc wt.u_ t31L BI<t4t"13 -Ztt f}ovSi �� L-ou-� 3Asu-4-LA3T)1 S) l5 GiLLk"Ci►p- Sao 5CQuMz-t. R -i -t AS 5FEC1LFti0 Iw 43� Z e) 0%C-LvE%-AJ is C,AaA(kL aQJ.Q0P%-tom ��trzt��,.�c�+ �) tzlA- Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. t tie °e SLi "-'k-?AeL:T' p tJ -C*t "C ttt A00 t'Z ltx-0'c L- S"COS - 1►v L.tv"t-s CN. kVLLA - Lac .s Ae-V-.At)y rrtNtSNtr� IYS �iLi m= Tk}E Mks -c --?,4t- vwEL1kNL\ . t -1-y ?A,R-rL 7ZS huV-1AL)Y -C 1'ii't'�11i'Pcl, Dwr'lLtw�C� I"Ick-- l? -f tS 06 P•D�t-Cwr. �- li„tl�kt-i vN f u►3ut_. S ��vtLtS . "Dt'Cta+.s OF Ttte- Stove lr� t ut_ �iZS�r -C L 0�*-� t�ct�9S.+hR �( P. (�+aiL"�,r� E`►.� 1 A r-��> c -t 2v i cr u i % t o S R vo.,r2 E FR -c. f fZ.tw�Lt Pbkt_ D w EU -1 N C.. '-C tt t.S WN., of c.or-t.c-,� �4a�-� uv to �. A•2�.� %�z +-�y P q-2�.�-c S , 3 March 12, 2007 Department of Community Development Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 To Whom It May Concern: I am attaching this letter with my request for a Special Use Permit - Accessory Apartment for your consideration. It is my desire to further emphasize the importance of my request while providing addition information pertaining to our circumstance. My family recently relocated to Roanoke during a consolidation of offices with American HealthCare, where I serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer. We built a house in River Oaks at Russlen Farms in Roanoke County. My parents have moved in with its after relocating from Virginia Beach. My father and mother are 72 and 69 years of age, respectively. They are on a limited income and need the benefit of sharing living space within my home. My wife and I recently had our walkout basement finished during the month of January (Building Permit # B0602953). We share this area with my parents. I am seeking permission to add a stove to the basement thus adding to my parents quality of life and allowing them more independence without climbing the stairs multiple times daily for kitchen access. It is an honor and privilege to be in a position to assist my parents during this time of their lives. We are asking your assistance in improving their quality of life and allowing them the independence that they have had for all of their years by approving our Special Use Permit request. This addition of a stove that creates an Accessory Apartment will not be used for anyone other than my parents and my immediate family. Thank you for your consideration. If I can provide any additional information, I am willing and able to at your request. Regards -c Le eave Cc: Thomas and Toni LeNeave (parents) Lisa and Dan Toti (neighbor) Mark and Chris Miller (neighbor) LEGEND THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY OF THE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS APE 0 IRON PIN SET SHOWN HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS BY IMPROVEMENTS EITHER FROM ADJOINING • IRON PIN FOUND PREMISES OR FROM SU9JECT PREMISES OTHER THAN SHOWN HEREON. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPDRT AND IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY SUCH. PROPERTY 15 IN F_F.M A. OEF[NED ZONE % (UNSHADED;. L'7r , ✓ I .c. OT y $12'03"07"W 1 12.47' I , A f s ? � P✓24 �'v —50 \ 1 I N Lor 29 UZI 0.900 ACRE V CURVE C 1 L=80.43�— R= 795.00' D=2 **7'56 CH BRG=N 15'24 55'E SII CH DIST=79 86' 4' 1:' 2c4 src ^y b I r 'r 3 _ ., j `_—� :..� i i ; I ✓��� �,;•, lit ,.y�� IVA 1 RIVER OAKS DRIVE 40' R/W NOTES: 1. OWNERS OF RECORD: RUSSLEN FAR!✓S DEVELOPVENT, LLC 2. LEGAL REFERENCE- PLAT BOOK 23, PG 139 PPYSICAL IMPRC'VENENT SURVEY FCR INST. #200200760 3. TAX MAP NUMBER: 56.03-4-29 TED A. LEIVEAVEE 4. IRON PINS SET BASED UPON VONUMENTS FOUND ON THE OVERALL BOUNDARY OF RIVER 2132 RIVER OAKS DP,!V- OAKS AT RUSSLEN FARMS, SECTION 2, LOT 29, SECTICN 2 RECORDED !N PLAT BOOK 28, PAGE 139. 4004- �� RIVER OAKS AT RUSSLEN FARMS 5. 10NDERGROUND UTILITY SERVICE LIMES .�`_ TH �� a���,PV 1, 5f PLAT BOOK 28, FP,GE 139 CATAVdBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RCLNOKE COUNTY, VIPGINI •JJ1 T ~ SURVEYED D"CEMBER 1, 2006 .o BPIA:v CASELL.A —. •� n. JC?9fiC620542.GC • s ♦ fa +702805 SCALE- 1" — aO' 4 � Z 1Z. �' c�_ cL ao . . .......... C3 LO jo 0 X 4C) CL y. &A. lti W Of OA < <0 CNI I- � 00 ao . . .......... C3 LO jo 0 X 4C) CL 17 tY &A. lti W Of OA < C -i �. Lijo 0 ct L- C, LA. 0 0O ku etc P Lo La < 00 0 :z ao . . .......... co jo 0 X 4C) CL 17 tY &A. La < 00 0 :z . . . .......... ch lti OA �^J <0 I- � CPL LU OF H 4N +F Community Development s Planning & Zoning Division a X87 POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 N OF pOANo�F Community Development Z Planning & Zoning Division p _ z r8s8 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCED The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for plamiing staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Name of Petit! Pe tloner's Slgnature 3 - /02 -0 -- Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 6 Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Ted Alan Leneave Existing Zoning., R9 Proposed Zoning: R 1 S Tax Map Number: 56.03-04-29 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 0.890 Acres 19 March, 2007 Scale: 1 " = 100' Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Ted Alan Leneave Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: RIS Tax Map Number.' 56.03-04-29 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 0.890 Acres 19 March, 2007 Scale: 1 " = 100' o-1 oo County of Roanoke For Staff Use Only Community Development Date received :� / Receivedby_____ Planning & Zoningtn Applicatio1, fee: PC/BZA date. 5204 Bernard Drive } . { IIZ�7 P 0 BOX 29800 Placards issued: BOS date, 9 4 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798;�� (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155��� Case Number ✓ ^ \� Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP VIAA WS/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x I 1" concept plan Application fee Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prope or the owner'sent or ontract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. l L!� �C�lc� Owner's Signature 2 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) 'gRezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance []Waiver ❑Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: u 4? y Work: 7 `�� _ ,S.SrG^ G u "_ `fS % S�iti'✓!/��' /G[tr� 07` Cell#: 3 / No.: ?� 7/ 2c3�F/ Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Property Location 7 �� �u �-C: �✓ �O� Magisterial District: Community Planning area: �'fr� ✓ �2/s1c `r.���� K- Tax Map No.: 7 % ,, Existing Zoning: S�i d& -?p A -/l- C - Size of parcel(s): Acres: `ajL. Size Existing Land Use: S i /Ji✓, —/-r its- ✓� l REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (I5.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C „ I Proposed Land Use: dI r-� - —94/i, ",) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes N No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes'X No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND -ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP VIAA WS/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x I 1" concept plan Application fee Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prope or the owner'sent or ontract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. l L!� �C�lc� Owner's Signature 2 Rezoning request for 3722 Colonial Ave. This will be our second attempt at getting the subject property rezoned from R-1 to C-1. When the Board of Supervisors last heard this request, problems with traffic on Green Valley Drive and parking at the proposed site were major factors in their decision to deny the request. Originally, we planned to have at least 8 rental station in the new salon with a total of 12 parking spaces including two handicap spaces. Our new plan will be to limit the studio to a maximum of 5 rental stations. We have also increased our parking spaces from 12 to 16. I have requested HSMM to do a comparative traffic study at our salon on Brambleton, to give us a much better estimate of the number of trips that could be expected at the new salon. The two salons are very similar in the type of customer, the length of stay, and the normal in and out times. Although Brambleton is a much busier salon (we have 14 stations there), I feel this study will be a helpful comparison. Regarding the ongoing remodeling at The Colonial Ave house, I have been upgrading numerous things that would, in my opinion, need to be accomplished whether the property is rezoned or remains residential. The kitchen and bath both have to be remodeled, the 50 year old ungrounded and cloth coated wiring is a fire hazard, and most of the plumbing is antiquated. In addition, enclosing the carport adds value and a better look to the property. Finally, let me add that my wife and I are confident that this is an ideal location for our business. We are dedicated to improving the overall appearance of the property be it for business or residence. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR WAIVER REQUEST Applicant Judy Taylor Wagner (3722 Colonial Avenue — Tax Map No. 077.18-03-31) The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The C-1 District permits personal service uses. These uses include beauty shops. Such uses are appropriately found along major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and where commercial zoning has been established. Such is true in this area of Colonial Avenue. The use is consistent with the transition and core land use categories of the County Development Plan, The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and the Colonial Avenue Development Plan permit uses of this nature. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and the Colonial Avenue Development Plan permit such uses when done in a manner which is appropriate in order to preserve the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. The entrance from Green Valley Drive prohibits ingress and egress on Colonial Avenue, which is in accord with the plans. The screening and buffering protect the residential property to the rear. This property is fronted on Colonial Avenue in an area where almost all properties along Colonial Avenue are commercially zoned. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The rezoning will have no negative impact on adjoining properties and the surrounding areas and no negative impact on the provision of public services. The entrance to the property on Green Valley Drive will remove ingress and egress issues from Colonial Avenue. Adequate screening and buffering, as called for in the Colonial Avenue Development Plan, will be provided with the development. er-Tavlor\JUSTIFICATION. doc (-l' J19 P� Va11ey 2.1 15. 2.6D Ac. 4 'J 9 s707 34. A. U • - 12 �s 33. J71J 66' p 15 • J •r• R J719 m� .' s - •• 3. � 2. s° _ 31-4.9 .�� O J621 CAvence ••#•• J725 I'D - �5 1 16. J60J Off` Boptisf 1 �!, 16 P 6 J6J'1 S 9 30. �h J7 �h6ry y �h -T7 ••• ��3• •� •••••• d' rho 2. �f CP m ••• 16 ,l9 1.9 * - J741 �O' • oo 17 4. J6J-9 1 ••1 •• dYs� 15. J609 ,�1. 31. '9� / I'D ms ••• `••• 0'1$� J74S - , �s �5 5718 5 2 5. J645 s•• ��a J615 ° X00 �• `'2s '�� •• •• Ay �h 14. s 17. `01 909 32. 6. J651 9`' •••• h J724 -s9 ,�'S J, / • c'`JS 20 N 's J657 �h 1 B J621 s 13. /�� ,1 7. 1 ••• J7JO . os i �• 9. 1� •• J640 2 y 17�oJ516 �' -s •• h 'lh 1 9. °, d� ,, 21 12. J627 ', ,O� 9h r, 5 J66J •••• • 20. 20.8 16 ys `�o 22' `�� so 90ry� 9� s J671 Qy J650c'0 o 5 s B 90 21.. °o 15 i s 43 nn (-l' J19 P� Va11ey 2.1 15. 2.6D Ac. 4 'J 9 s707 34. 11. �s 33. J71J 66' p • J •r• 32. J719 m� .' s - •• 3. 24 s� O CAvence °� 31. J725 I'D Boptisf 1 �!, Ct7Uf-Ch 30. �h J7 J716 -T7 ••• h 29. d' rho 2. �f ••�• .# m J7?? - J741 �O' • oo v a •• '' 31. '9� / C-1 J74S •• ,sy , �s 5 \ ` �• 1 hd6 '�� �1 30. ```.\ �d°� •�• J718� 909 32. O `� `h .••••• �•• a7 J7J0 / (-l' J19 P� Va11ey 2.1 15. 2.6D Ac. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application_ The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pen -nit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS L� a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. it f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties / g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ii. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections /o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants t/ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that 11 items required in the checklist above are complete. �J Signature o pplicant Date 31 PROFFERS The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with the rezoning request: 1. The subject property will be developed in accordance with the Site Plan dated 10 January, 2006 and revised 14 March 2007. 2. The carport is to be enclosed, but no other expansion will be made. 3. Colonial Avenue will not be utilized for ingress and egress to the subject property. 4. A qualified engineer will design a storm water management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to. 5. The building will be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetology (the cosmetic treatment of skin, hair and nails). 6. The building will be occupied by a maximum of 5 (five) licensed cosmetologists providing personal services to their clients. 7. The salon will be open from 9:30 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. Monday thru Saturday. 8. Any outdoor lighting will be installed in accordance with the Colonial Avenue Development Plan so as not to be offensive to neighbors. 9. There will be no off site parking on Green Valley Drive. Owner��'G��~i Judy Taylor Owner Z4 Richard W. -Wagner COLONIAL AVE ---- - -- - -0 •-•---•---•--- - - _- I ---- - - - - --— - — - — - — - — - i f i I � e4asTM4 /�� I i i I i T go I COLONIAL AVENUE 1 HAfR SALON ? 1rrRo,c 1A" Ir i PA1K$ IP, on3o-os-slno-oaca .>D-1AGENr PfxoPErtrY I I ZONED G -I I I O Viae AND A ',L'nKy dJtO LOT) - 91340T i O © DeTtlelp!0 I I Z AOA SPACM I i m I O © PJQSTINS MCA SUC2N 'IA" I OOOOO000000 j 'TE." m ---------------- I C7 i i m I i i i i I i I ADJACENT PROPERTY i I I I I I � i ZONED R -I I I I I I I F r CONCEPT SITE PLAN SGALE� F,30 COLONIAL AVENUE HAIR SALON 37:22 COLONIAL AVE- ROANOKE. VA Rife +Wood .4 R C H I T E C T S A5 NOTED L-{/ /J') /+ R—ke. VA 2400 (540)344-6015 T l 1 �' �I��� L� T J7� ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS This list as follows are those property owners who own property beside, behind or across the street from the subject property noted above: COUNTY OF ROANOKE Official Tax Number Ownels Name and Mailinq Address 077.18-03-24 Steven Mark Harrell 3716 Colonial Avenue 3716 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 077.18-03-30 Edwin Victor & Mary Ann Selander 3718 Colonial Avenue 3718 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 077.18-03-32 Cordie Shealor Nutter 3730 Colonial Avenue 3730 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 077.18-04-11 Mary H. Smith 3713 Colonial Avenue 5255 Lakeland Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 77.18-04-32 J. William Gibson 3737 Colonial Avenue 303 Mountain Lane Boones Mill, VA 24065 077.18-04-33 Elmer E. & Bessie M. Carter 3725 Colonial Avenue 3725 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 077.18-04-34 Hazel A. & Kathy E. Peters 3719 Colonial Avenue 5022 Ranchcrest Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 OF 0.0A/V0�� Community Development Z Planning & Zoning Division V a 1838 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. ane IF Petition Petitioner's gnature Date Effective date: April 19, 2005 0 00 10 �p G� Site �y ZONING / - AG3� EP AG1� AR� AV C1 C2 C2CV00 11 ® 12 PCD PRD PTD R1 R2 R3 R4 Applicants Name: Richard and Judy Wagner Roanoke County N Existing Zoning: R1 Department of Proposed Zoning: C1 Tax Map Number 77.18-03-31 Community Development Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.369 Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1 " = 100' con: - Principal Industrial Applicants Name: Richard and Judy Wagner Roanoke County Existing Zoning: R1 Department of Proposed Zoning: G1 Tax Map Number., 77.18-03-31 Community Development Magisterial District: Gave Spring Area: 0.369 Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1"= 100' County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl Date received: Received by: Application fee: PCBZA date: �.c. r _I n Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number i 0 — ? ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 4540 ' �u(p�o - O3 4 i -J-^TiN Cp'4TO4L Work: Jjt I b l2 c> Cell #: SOwneaoar4a KC V14 Zq 0 19 Fax No.: 140 3 G G • VF -?S- Owner's r's name/address w/zippT 1q" Phone #: t'lAG.0 C l.J1at.�14V61 G q 17�tCe" Work: 14015 G&a-OOH S VVL1�.V Fax No. #: 1Fir4C-ASTt-e , VA Property Location Magisterial District: 7 Water and sewer application Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: 4 . le - OZ -01, 010 Existing Zoning: ' C ZG S Z l - vi Size of parce](s): Acres: 0-8'44 Existing Land Use: VAci4r•I r REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN ps.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C -Z Proposed Land Use: HGTEL O(L OiFtl3PZGorvf n1>E2C.►�4t. ����i Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes Dr No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No ❑ 1F NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No 51 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA Consultation R/S/W/CP V/AA ✓ 8 1/2" x I t" concept plan R/S/W/CP V/AA ✓ Application fee ✓ Application ✓ Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ✓ Justification Water and sewer application ✓ Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the is agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW. REQUESTS Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. 3 JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. if additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. q1A 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property. K( A 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. N10 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. AJA 4 JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons Ifor appeal: /tel 1 2. Evidence supporting claim: Nja 5 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development ofthe property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS ✓ a. Applicant name and name of development V b. Date, scale and north arrow C. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties ✓ g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights 1i i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional inforWati.ort required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site ✓ 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers ✓ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals ✓ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections ✓ o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants V p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed V q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. 63-15-0-7 Signature of a scant Date 01 pOQ)p Community Development Planning & Zoning Division z 783 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written continents and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planrting staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective Date: April 19, 2005 Name of tition Pet n is Signature 03-6-6-1 Date uak � e Community Development Planning & Zoning Division +e POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/ Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Statement of Justification Rezoning of Parcel 018.18-02-03.00 Existing Zoning C2 -C (52-12-1988) Proposed Zoning C2 The purpose of this rezoning request is to remove the proffered conditions associated with rezoning case (52-12-1988). In 1988 the property was rezoned from B-2 to B-3 to allow for a vehicle service station. As part of this rezoning the following conditions were proffered: 1) Site will be developed in \substantial conformance with the concept plan. 2) Facility will not be used for repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body or fender work or repairing or overhauling trucks exceeding 10,000 lbs gross weight. 3) There will be no overnight outside parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 4) Petitioner will install Type D Screening as recommended by County staff. 5) Petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with recommendations and approval of County staff. 6) Total signage will not exceed 180 s£ No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property. The zoning of this property has since been re -designated as C -2c and the underlying C-2 designation allows by -right the requested use as a vehicle service station. The petitioner is requesting that the proffers be removed from the property so it can be developed in accordance with the C-2 by right uses listed in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The subject parcel is adjoined on all sides by other C-2 properties that have no restrictions or proffers associated with them. This request furthers the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance by providing a site in an appropriate highly commercial area that could offer a variety of commercial and/or service related needs. The site is located on a major arterial thoroughfare and can serve large segments of the county. This project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained with the Roanoke County Community Plan by encouraging commercial growth in appropriate locations. In this case the removal of the conditions will allow for appropriate commercial development that will not only provide tax advantages but will also provide support services to the large scale industrial and commercial developments in the immediate area. No negative impacts to the county infrastructure are anticipated with this development. All improvements will be arcade in accordance with Roanoke County, Western Va Water Authority and VDOT standards. Legal Description Parcel # 018.18-02-03.00 •BEGINNING at a point along tl aa*_ :&'Wvte;r;ly,,.,ri ht -of -way line of Plantation Road (Virginia Route ;�15r) f�n97.`,! �.ng a common corner with the southwest corner of"1icb�6.Eis Corporation Property, as recorded in Deed Book 1292, Page: 454 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke ounty, and said corner being 409.98 feet south of the southeast intersections of Plantation Road with Interstate I-81; thence leaving Plantation Road and with McDonalds Corporation in a northeasterly direction, N 65° 00' 10" E, 185.34 feet to a point and said point being along the westerly side of New Parcel "C" (1.141 ac.), property of Willilam C. Hale and Eunice G. Hale and Robert 0. Hale and Pauline A. Hale; thence S 20° 34' 15" E, 187.49 feet to a point and said point being along the northerly side of property of Carl Slate and Carol A, Hughes Slate; thence with Slate in a southwepterly direction, S 65° 00' 10" W, 201.48 feet to a point: on the easterly right-of-way line of Plantation Road; thence with Plantation Road in a northerly direction, N 180 28' 00" W, 137.47 feet to a point; thence N 89 26' 24" W, 52.33 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.844 acres, as more particularly shown on plat as recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 1242, Page 1518. B AND ASSOCIATES INC . PO I P -r -Q REFLECTING TOMORROW Adioinin2 Property Owners: TM#: 18.18-02-01.00 McDonalds Corporation 8115 Plantation Road 1.22 AC Zoning: C2C Billing Address: MKG Enterprise Attn: Michael Grimm 2965 Colonnade Drive Suite 310 Roanoke. VA 24018 TM#: 18.18-01-08.00 SVS Hospitality Inc. 8110 Plantation Road 0.85 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Venkat Reddy President 8040 Plantation Road Roanoke, VA 24019 TM#: 18.18-02-04.00 Slate Carl & Carol Ann Hughes 7538 Friendship Lane 3.54 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Slate Carl & Carol Ann Hughes 7538 Friendship Lane Hollins, VA 24019 Balzer & Associates Inc. TM#: 18.18-02-02.00 Smith Alice K 7670 Keaton Drive 0.60 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address.- Smith ddress:Smith Alice K 855 KenBridge Road Blackston, VA 23824 TM#: 18.18-02-03.01 Hale William C & Eunice G Et Als 0 Keaton Drive 1.14 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Hale William C & Eunice G Et Als 1408 Brughs Mill Road Fincastle, VA 24090 Balzer & Associates Inc. r K 1292 P 1 0106 7 IMTERSTATZ SI . ' R/ W VAR10,9 v O SO' IZ' �Q• Q r. Vl 71t7* WLwtti%P4RGtLCwtonEl:TY 1.2�fi RY 1.. KEI► �{ •e+ • � a r I I I No 40 =T I'3 G • e� �Z %p l • CD I ,� nw Q � � � \ �,�� 1 N� ��� � I N W F� � �C• �: iLl • "`w u � \\ \�,, dGg�,►��,to 3 oto � i � Jg►_'- �?°s• q' �.�• 110 !- ��,� N �., L�aJ. 00 Li mew 5�3 PAIRCEL y, Z•gam• u,� d? ��N s. �� ! I 1.141 A.C. •0 � �I N � N � 9 � ! 1�` A 7d 14 w P• tf �, ! J f3 —� waw > • i J 0 9 �! s Z > PARCEL "S" ! A844 AC. 'A- 05 ! 1 `core: Cuomo M&RIt4as ALOWA PLI.MTATION RoAko TAKILM FROM Rb. ami RS. OAS AND D.S. rm Pck. tSte, mo R^Dtus WAS b�L`CItt1lO. AprrlortD:l] P c AGENT ROAWORT COUNTYPLANOI IG MUSS -ION IN tlit C6tRR'S .•fPICt MR TOE CIRCUI COUNTY, VIRGINIA TSIS MAY WAS PRESENTED MITI ACRNOWLtDGIRENT TNSRC*o ATTACNtD ADMITTED TO R i O'CLOCK _.M. ON ?PIS DAY OF i-- T937ts 0310I9AST r!. STORES ozrmr MIKE TQE SUSJCCT PROPERTY r' NOT WITHIN TBI L: YEAR FLOOD OWNDART AS SHOWN ON THE rttli KAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS SASED ON ESR rI ane I Wm RD !Y ACTUAL FIELD tLEVI o z \ ! , o / /% i wz �F- \ � LU o- �= m �' �z�OW to CD i i / �wwzz= ooLL� F- C) \ I Off' / /� �� 0a=auia O Q of U w r C)/�/ i/ wp�2z0 z��W�� a / J O i LU Z z U W z � I I rw N �' ww O r = p J Z � r H a w m en / a !� X �' W z Ina O �� i I? l j!ii / iii g0afuzj �\ Q�/ , ppaaa \\\ m N 00 �4 LU C) 3LU o clf LU Q 1 Go NAME CD U U H Lu O coo r. ,cro U�lL, Jz LU M z W W 0 UQ w cn Q O� 2 O N O N Z O O U N m u U z ! Of � z o z zoo J W N pw U l7 / of cc z rn - a < o oa Of a 1 1 a w ZONING - AG3 EP AG1 AR AV C1 C2 C2CVOD 11 12 PCD PRD ` PTD R1 R2 R3 R4 Applicants Name: Jatin Patel Roanoke County Existing Zoning: C2C Department of Proposed Zoning: C2 Tax Map Number: 18.18-02-03 Community Development Magisterial District: Hollins Area: 0.844 Acres 19 March, 2007 Scale: 1 " = 100' County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only- Date received: Received by: -311 16-1 Application fee: PU3Z date: Placards issued: BOS date: 4 7 a Case Number •— / C)� ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ■ Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: (540) 772-2005 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al (see attached sheet) Work: PO Box 29800 / 5204 Bernard Drive Cell #: Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax No.: (540) 772-2193 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: (540) 772-2005 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al (see attached sheet) Work: PO Box 29800 / 5204 Bernard Drive Fax No. #: (540) 772-2193 Roanoke, VA 24018 Property Location — Properties are located at the end of Magisterial District: Catawba Glenmary Drive (north of I-81), along Corporate Community Planning area: Glenvar Circle, and at the end of Putney Drive Tax Map No.: Various Parcels — see attached sheet Existing Zoning: PTD and R-1 Size of parcel(s): Acres: _479.55+/- Acres_ Existing Land Use: Research & Technology Park / Vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: PTD with amended Master Plan and amended Development Guidelines/Protective Covenants Proposed Land Use: Research & Technology Park Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ❑ No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ❑ No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No O VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s):_ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP V/AA RIS/W/CP VIAA R/S/W/CP V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification ii Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum.- ALL inimum: ALL APPLICANTS x a. Applicant name and name of development x b. Date, scale and north arrow x c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions x d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties x e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc, x f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties x g. All property lines and easements x h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights x i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development x j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS x k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site x I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers x in. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals x n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections x o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants x p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed x q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT SIGNATURE FORM (1) ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS cerm..'e- /- Signature E i r3 a r— 6U, r . Printed Name I� Title (2) ROANOKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Rignature , ff/l. I-V. Printed Name ifiyI1 `t N qn/ Title (3) NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS INC. 7ijA�:� Signature` -C-j- �1 'vJ N l lL Printed Name Title (4) TECWN PIMDUCTS, LLC ip Printed maN e Title m z G I 28: z -Y DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH Et TECHNOLOGY DRAFT 3-09-07 ARTICLE I - GENERAL DECLARATIONS AND PERMITTED USES A. Purpose The purpose of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants are to ensure that the property designated as the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology will be developed and maintained in an attractive, park -like campus setting for science and technology businesses, research and development businesses, corporate offices and environmentally appropriate manufacturing uses as approved under the terms and conditions set forth in this document and in accordance with the approved zoning of the property. B. Definitions 1. Design Review Team: The development review body appointed by the County Administrator in accordanoe with these Development Standards and Protective Covenants to assist the County in reviewing development proposals for the Center. 2. County Administrator: The Administrator of Roanoke County or his designee. 3. Business or Businesses: The owner(s), lessee(s), or occupant(s), including prospective owners, lessees or occupants of the Property. 4. Center: Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 5. Improvements: Any and all improvements made to or constructed upon the Property including, but not limited to roads, buildings, structures, tanks and storage containers, drainage and utility facilities, driveway and parldng areas, grading, landscaping, fencing, screening devices, site lighting, communication devices, signs, and all similar or related structures or improvements. 1 6. Center Master Plan: The general development plan and a land use plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, including infrastructure, road and parcel design as approved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 7. Community: The Glenvar Community Planning Area as defined by the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 8. Property or Properties: The parcel or parcels of land, including any improvements thereon, located in the Center, as set forth in any deed, option, lease, agreement, or agreement of sale applicable to these restrictions. 9. Restrictions: The covenants, design guidelines, conditions and restrictions contained in this document 10. Park: Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology located in Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with the Center Master Plan dated 3-09-07, prepared by Hill Studio, and adopted by the County of Roanoke on 11. Setback: The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from a street right-of-way or lot line 12. Transfer: Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Properly, any portion thereof, or any interest therein, by contract deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assignment, lease, operation of law, or other means, to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary or involuntary. In the case of a non -publicly held corporation, the assignment or other transfer of fifty percent (50%) or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constitute a Transfer, unless made to the corporations parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assignment of partnership interests in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the partnership interests shall constitute a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of its membership interests shall constitute a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constitute a Transfer. 2 C. Applicability These Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, including the land use regulations and building requirements, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in and to the real property or any portion thereof, and shall be incorporated in any Transfer of the Property as covenants running with the Property. The County Administrator shall record applicable documents and revisions associated with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants with the Roanoke County Clerk of the Circuit Court Invalidation of any of the provisions of these guidelines and covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, or parts thereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. D. Land Uses and Development Standards 1. Uses Permitted The Center shall be developed exclusively as established in the Center Master Plan for uses designated and incorporated herein All properties shall be developed in accordance with the design guidelines and requirements set forth in these Covenants and Development Standards. All uses shall enhance the natural and scenic qualities of the business park and be environmentally friendly with efficient, clean operations. Noise and lighting shall be considered environmental factors in evaluating a potential land use. All manufacturing operations and storage shall be located within fully enclosed buildings. Properties within the Center shall be used only for the following purposes. Land uses not listed are prohibited. a. Corporate offices. b. Science, research and technology businesses, services, or laboratories where processes are environmentally clean and efficient. c. General manufacturing and assembly establishments where processes, fabrication and products are environmentally clean and efficient. d. Recreational facilities in accordance with the Center Master Plan. e. Conference and educational facilities. f. Parking facilities. g. Utility maintenance and service facilities. h. Accessory uses associated with a primary permitted use such as a day care center, telecommunication facilities, etc., in accordance with any established County standards. Z. Development Standards The use and development of all properties in the Center shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Article 1111 of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 3. Preliminary Approval of Use The proposed use of a property in the Center must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Design Review Team prior to the transfer of land, or subsequent transfer. Any proposed changes in use of properties within the Park also must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Design Review Team. ARTICLE II: ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES A. Design Review Team — Appointment and Responsibilities The County Administrator shall appoint members of the Design Review Team to serve as the working level review group for development of the Center. The Design Review Team may perform other functions assigned by the County Administrator. The Design Review Team shall be comprised of three (3) residential Community representatives, three (3) business Community representatives, two (2) professional representatives, and one (1) member of the Economic Development Department, who shall also serve as coordinator of the team. The Design Review Team shall meet as necessary to consider land use or development proposals. 2. The Design Review Team exists to ensure harmony and design appropriateness of improvements in the Center. 3. The Design Review Team shall recommend approval or disapproval of a land use in the Center, including changes in use. 4. The Design Review Team shall review preliminary development plans and provide comments on development proposals in accordance with the procedures set forth in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 5. To ensure adherence to the approved development guidelines and covenants, final development plans will be available to the Design Review Team prior to approval by the County. 6. The Design Review Team shall be deemed to be a "covered person' for the purposes of Roanoke County's self-insurance program The County will defend a covered person from any and all claims or personal injury or death, loss of property, or damage to property arising from construction, land use, conduct of business or any other activities within the Center. 7. In the event the Design Review Team is dissolved or terminated for any reason, all rights, privileges, responsibilities, and obligations of the Design Review Team under this declaration, shall transfer and be assigned without restriction to the designee(s) appointed by the County Administrator. S. Improvements, In General No construction, exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County and subsequently to the Design Review Team. Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans to the Design Review Team review, provided such interior changes do not change any use of the Property. E Review and recommendation of approval with respect to uses and improvements by the Design Review Team shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any permits or approvals required by any local, state or federal law or regulation- Plans will be subject to all applicable federal and state laws and County ordinances. Pertinent ordinances of the County include, but may not be limited to: Zoning, Subdivision, Storm Water Management, Erosion/Sediment Control and Steep Slope Ordinances, as amended. C. Subdivision, in General All property within the Center shall be subdivided in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. The minimum lot size in the Center is one acre. D. Prooect Review Process All proposed improvements and land uses within the Center shall be reviewed by the County and the Design Review Team as set forth below. 1. Initially, proposed improvements and land uses shall be discussed with the County Department of Economic Development for general consistency with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 2. After the initial review, the County Department of Economic Development shall arrange for a meeting of the Design Review Team and forward preliminary improvement or land use information, as specified in Section E below, to the Design Review Team for review and recommendation 3. Upon reviewing the proposed project, the Design Review Team shall make its recommendations in writing to the County Administrator. 4. The County Administrator shall accept/approve or reject/deny the Design Review Team's recommendations. If the County Administrator accepts/approves the Design Review Team's recommendations, a final development plan may be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for official County review. If the County Administrator does not agree with the recommendations of the Design Review Team, then the County Administrator shall discuss any objections with the Design Review Team to resolve issues and reach consensus prior to making a formal decision regarding processing of the final development plan by the Zoning Administrator. 5. Upon receiving a final development plan, the Zoning Administrator shall ensure that the proposed improvement is consistent with all applicable County regulations and with the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants (a proffered condition of zoning for the property). 6. Final development plans shall be made available to the Design Review Team prior to final plan approval by the County. 7. Any final decision of the County Administrator or Zoning Administrator with the respect to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants may be appealed to the County Board of Supervisors by filing a petition specifying the grounds for appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision. 8. Any final decision of the Board of Supervisors may be appealed to the Roanoke County Circuit Court by filing a petition specifying the grounds for appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision 5 E. Pro iect Review Procedures All proposed development and land uses shall be reviewed m accordance with the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. For the purposes of Design Review Team review of the proposed land development, preliminary plans for site development and buildings are to include the following information: 1. Plans shall be of a suitable scale and size to permit reasonable review of the proposed development. 2. Plans shall provide applicable information on lot size, building size, parking areas, and areas for landscaping/open space. 3. Plans shall indicate the footprint of all proposed buildings and structures to be located on the site. Future improvements shall be shown as proposed future development 4. Plans shall indicate building setbacks, right-of-way limits, and utility or other easements. 5. Plans shall indicate any natural watercouises or proposed areas for storm water management 6. Plans shall indicate the location of large stands of trees and/or single large -canopy trees on the Property 7. Plans should include a preliminary grading plan, if available. 8. Plans should provide additional information on signage, lighting, refuse collection, trails or other site development elements, if available. 9. Plans shall include preliminary building elevations showing building facade elements, exterior materials, and accessory elements (i.e. lot lighting fixtures, sign structures). 10. Plans shall include general location information for any exterior or support utilities. F. Maintenance of Improvements All properties, buildings, structures and improvements shall be maintained in a neat, clean and attractive condition at all times. Landscaping and open grass areas shall be kept clean and free from weeds, underbrush, trash and debris at all times. Painted and exposed metal surfaces shall be maintained and kept free from peeling or rust. Parking areas and drives shall be paved and damaged pavement or hard surfaces repaired. Property owners shall promptly replace any dead or damaged landscaping approved as part of the landscaping plan for the Property. G. Enforcement Enforcement of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall be undertaken on behalf of the County by the Zoning Administrator. In the event of a violation, the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall have the ultimate jurisdiction to enforce or interpret any of the restrictions, conditions, covenants, and liens now or hereafter imposed by these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. Failure to 0 enforce any provision contained in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the provisions, whether the violation is singular or repetitive. After providing reasonable notice to the business, the County Administrator reserves the right to enter the property during regular business hours to inspect the property and determine compliance with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. If violations or breach of provisions are found, enforcement shall be as provided by the Roanoke County Code, as amended. ARTICLE IIL DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Center. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply. A. Site Development Environmental Features: The natural environment and vistas of the Center are significant contributing park features that shall be considered in siting new development and buildings on the property - a. Natural features such as streams, stands of mature trees and scenic vistas shall be identified in early planning and development designed to enhance such features for the benefit of all park inhabitants and the community. b. Grading for the development should emphasize natural land -forms and scenic vistas. Where substantial site grading may be required, careful design consideration shall be given to building floor and elevation alternatives in order to minimize effects on the natural environment and incorporate natural amenities into the development 2. Green Development Encouraged: Site development and new buildings shall consider and incorporate green development options and sustainable development were possible. Development is encouraged that is consistent with the U. S. Green Building Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards. 3. Buffer Areas: Dedicated buffers are established in the Center to protect adjacent residential properties. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet There shall be no private development or operations located within these buffers. Where development is proposed adjacent to these buffers, every effort shall be made to foster compatibility between the land uses and to ensure that appropriate measures are undertaken to minimize potential development impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation, and hours of operation. The Design Review Team will provide insight and guidance regarding appropriate users and measures to minimize effects on neighboring residential properties. 4. Circulation New buildings shall be designed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity in public areas and in open spaces or along greenways. Linkages to public areas shall be included in the design of the site and buildings. Linkages between other Center properties are encouraged, where feasible and appropriate. 7 1. Siting and Location A recommended building siting diagram is presented below. a Buildings shall be located on the site such that the development establishes an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and parking and enhances the natural and man-made features of the Center. b. Buildings shall be sited on the property to relate to primary street(s) in the Center. c. Building setbacks shall be consistent with established zoning regulations and shall consider relationships to buildings on adjacent properties, particularly as it may affect views and street appearances. EMPLOYEE PARKING AT SIDE OR REAR , LOADING AND UTILITY AREAS SCREENED, TO THE REAR , / LANDSCAPED PRIVATEIEMPLOYEE FRONTLAWN PUBLICNISITOR VISITOR PARKING AT FRONT 2. Height: Building height shall be as set forth by Roanoke County Zoning, as amended. a. Proposed building heights shall consider relationships to adjacent building heights, natural features and scenic vistas. b. Variable building heights are encouraged. I Design: All development shall meet the following design standards for exterior facades, materials, appurtenances and equipment a. General Building General Buildin�Desi i. The architectural composition, scale, elements, and details of a building shall relate to the sites natural features and character of the surrounding area and development ii. Landscaping shall be an integral component of the exterior design of any building. iii. All buildings shall minimize potential impacts from noise, light, and traffic. b. Building Facades and Materials: i. Buildings shall employ various architectural forms to create visual character and interest. Buildings shall be segmented with distinct masses of vertical and horizontal elements to minimize bulkiness. ii. Front building facades and those facing public streets shall be designed to exhibit attractive architectural features, materials, dimensions and symmetry. Brick, stone, architectural masonry and glass are the preferred exterior materials. Metal may be permitted when it is used in conjunction with other preferred architectural materials or when not visible from public streets. iii. All building facades shall be painted and/or finished architecturally in a manner that is consistent with these standards and with other properties in the Center. Paint colors should be compatible with the visual character of the Center. Two or more colors are encouraged to highlight architectural details and materials. iv. Building walls shall include dimensional architectural features (i.e. indentations, overhangs, entrance canopies, etc.) to provide attractive building mass and proportional building elements. Building walls are encouraged to be variable and not consist of expansive surfaces without a physical and visual break- v. reak v. Building entries shall be clearly visible and articulated using architectural features, elements and materials. vi. Windows shall be visible on all publicly -oriented building facades. The size and location of windows shall relate to the scale and proportions of the building elevation on which they are located. vii. Roofs shall be designed to be an integral component of the architecture of the building. Multiple roof lines and offsets are encouraged. Also, roof designs are encouraged to incorporate "green" technologies, as recommended by LEED standards. i. Where required, roof mounted equipment and vents shall be located in an inconspicuous location and shall be reasonably screened from public street views by painted panels, opaque screens, or other effective methods. ii. All exterior equipment shall be designed to minimize noise and shall include appropriate insulation materials or technologies to control outside noise. iii. Exposed features such as gutters, downspouts, vents, towers, etc. shall be designed to match the color of surfaces to which they are attached. E C. Parking, Loading Areas and Docks Parking for employees shall be located in areas that are removed from the primary public street entrance. 2. Parking for visitors shall be located in dose proximity to the main building entrance and shall be setback from the public street so as to not interfere with or detract from the primary street views of the building. 3. All parking areas shall be landscaped both internally and externally to enhance the architecture of the building, the site, and the Center. 4. Loading areas and docks shall be located in areas not visible from public streets and shall be appropriately screened and landscaped. 5. Lighting in parking and loading areas shall be as described in the following section on Lighting. D. Utilities 1. Underground Utilities: All utilities shall be located underground, unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. 2 Public Water and Sewer. All developments shall be served by public water and sewer systems. 3. Storm Water Management Areas: Low -impact design (L.I.D.) methods of managing storm water shall be considered m designing the development. All storm water management areas shall be landscaped appropriately and maintained. Management areas and drainage channels shall blend with the landscaping of the site and incorporate natural materials and vegetation. E. Wastes 1. No external waste treatment or storage facilities are permitted. 2. Bulk containers for trash are permitted, provided they are constructed in accordance with the standards for accessory structures. F. Li tin 1. Palette of Lighting Fixtures: The County has a selected palette of lighting fixtures recommended for both private and public development areas within the Center. Examples of recommended lighting fixtures are shown in Exhibit 1. 2. Lighting, In General: a. All lighting in the Center shall be in accordance with lighting standards established in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. All lighting in the Center shall be directed inward toward the building/site, and shall be shielded and directed downward to control extraneous light or glare. All light shall be 10 contained within property boundaries. Where development is located adjacent to buffers and residential properties, darklnight sky friendly lighting using full cutoff lighting fixtures is encouraged so that there is no direct light upward and no glare. c. Signage and lighting of employee and visitor parking lots shall be no greater than 25 feet in height, and kept to the minimum necessary for direction and safety during operating hours. d. Walkways and building entries are encouraged to have ground level lighting or pedestrian scale lights not exceeding 15 feet in height G. Accessory Structures Walls and Fences: Walls and fences shall complement the architecture of the building and be of materials that architecturally enhance the building and the Center. a. Fences shall not be permitted in front yards. Where fencing is needed, decorative metal fencing is preferred; chain-link fencing is not permitted unless it is not visible from public streets. Barbed wire is prohibited. b. Where retaining walls are required in the front yard or where they are visible from public areas, wall materials shall be stone or finished masonry. Retaining walls higher than 8 feet are discouraged. Long expanses of wall surfaces shall be offset and be appropriately landscaped. c. As an alternative to traditional retaining walls, "green walls" consisting of architectural concrete block, covered with a rapidly -growing groundcover, may be permitted in less visible areas. d. Terraced wall systems are encouraged supplemented with plantings on the flat terraces. 2. Outbuildings: All accessory buildings shall be consistent with the architecture of the primary building. Accessory buildings shall be located behind the primary building or shall not be visible from public streets. 3. Trash Enclosures: Areas for trash collection shall be accessible for service. All trash areas shall be fully enclosed and screened from view by opaque fencing and supplemental landscaping. Enclosures must be architecturally consistent and compatible with the design of the primary building. 11 0 r�r UA t Olt. a 70 � � m r om � 1� ii � cn C 2 CD x '' M to C d M E L CD cm Q =3 0 S] ED f5 >* T,7 O [0 � N uy 7, (D 4? 6. r aa) C CL E CL '3 Q E 7 m m CL M E LU MO «'� , c CD C CL `( (D uqU— -== 0 -0— r— M tn _ -0 cl 0 — E cn + L L L c- > aim P0 p 0� �= w x a)= c o'E (D Z0rc°CC -jir E t Olt. a � � m 3-1 -1 1� 4c co t Olt. a 1-1 Landscaping � SO 1. Landscape-l'alette- 'the County has a selected palette for landscaping recommended in both private and public areas within the Center. Examples of recommended landscaping are shown in Exhibit 2. 2. Site and Building Landsca2ing: Property and building designs shall include appropriate trees, shrubs, open grass areas, and flowers to enhance development and the Center. a. Properties shall be developed in accordance with the screening and landscaping provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, b. Trees are encouraged along street frontages, in parking areas and adjacent to buildings to complement the building scale. c. Landscaping shall be used to define entrances to buildings and parking areas, as well as screen accessory structures, loading areas and outdoor equipment areas. a. Landscaping of parking areas shall be as required by the Roanoke Comity Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Planting islands should exhibit a well-maintained, finished appearance. 4. Buffers: a. Where buffer yards are required, landscaping shall meet the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as arnended. �MWQ M a I IMI M I tM lu I I I M WJ UK C- g l -,w `0 c � L n �— I 4,_ L cn M W ajr,E_ Q L; u n < w r° ,. pr o. lQ b cit 0 Y cb a) > c+"' C: m G C_7 a v €3 [ t t Cm —his ars5 qua ot Ctri- ►[7 �� lu Q D [g fiJ C U 1` CL 1� s' M C7CU rn _ a Qui C 6- R7 EvLL t9 Cl C] 03 71 G C? r1x C} M -M CL ` ty o; � m T) - _ 1 r CLL �] M �- (5 Q] Q3 [/] (9 ? lt9 -i U Lin o U 4.L TT F I L �J' � � � V 1_L Lm a m J R . Y -Ic fo CAI I i. ,. V Jl � CI 1 •�. ,I L S 1. Sign Palette: The County has a selected palette for recommended public and private signage within the Center. Examples of recommended signs are shown in Exhibits 3 and 4. 2. Sign Number: No more than two primary signs per business may be erected on a property. One sign may be attached to the face of the primary building and one may be erected as a ground, monument sign- 3. ign 3. Sign Size and Design a. The sign shall be designed to be integrated and coordinated with the building to complement the building design in scale, color and materials. b. If placed on the building, the sign shall not exceed 150 square feet in size or ten percent of the front fagade, whichever is less. If erected as a ground monument structure, the sign shall not exceed 60 square feet in size and shall not exceed twelve feet in height. Ground monument signs may have two faces. Ground monument signs shall be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the front property line. c. Lighting shall be from directed, shielded sources toward the sign. Signs shall not be back lighted. d. Signs shall not include any motion devices or changing text. e. Roof signs and portable signs are not permitted. 4. Directional Signs: Directional signs shall be located as necessary to direct visitors, customers and employees to designated parking or loading areas. Directional signs shall be kept to a minimum and shall not include any logo or company identification. Directional signs shall be 3 square feet or less in size and shall not be lighted. 5. Temporary Signs: Temporary signs for the purposes of construction activity or the sale of real estate shall be as permitted by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. No other temporary signs are permitted. 15 5uJ C 0 (A~ K i y DC7 C Jr- - Q7 �: to C C E va r 0 o-0 E '0co o CL 0 r_ 0 =, ar a 0 cn �7 aD m G7 C] U C m 2 a E W O 6 { cc 77 mJC M mc.r C r C 41 .� y C c IDID aD C0 �6 ti C .NJ �+ [} t? r � r r 0 _ �- i? m ¢O %C7 ny UD 3 i — m m C 0 C3 �R c C z C7� ,O .T .sn Ln ut R� J • a a r IDID aD C0 �6 ti IA _ �6 y '1 ray IN 1"m WW-" a3_ �I *Wl �= ca ' E � vS cc m. C C VS U C t 47 47 E C ill CL d is N C: �J C T CEJ C Q -0 -� `0 dy cr C as cCO CD CU CC E(aQ5; CL _ L_ sa 0E 2 C C mow: 0 W CD L �L•y W 0 ��•ry• 0 � � � , y C:CU CU Q ��- E h L a a o � "k ry� r • ' U3 0- y 4 L i? L L CU ^n , {I% W ���yy W y.� r}n.� UUn' 0) o (D C[S fJi �-yy � ay � [U & .0cc C = .r V mNf� W A 3 LnL L r 0 Q3 C >. r , C D m U] '�y ' LLL L IIS m {I,i { W�' qp VI LG L ,N. C C tm C Lam? C E 3 iii -2) E i!} � Cd fz7 CLCDd C C �' 4? • 4i U3 Ql U C i '- m a 70 0mQ�Ct� U_ CO -0 r r • ■ y '1 ray IN 1"m WW-" a3_ �I *Wl I. Transportation Elements 1. Access Points: Site access points shall be kept to a minimum and consolidated. New driveway entrances shall be coordinated with existing entrances and adjacent uses for safe traffic circulation 2. Traffic Impact Study: A more detailed traffic impact study may be requested for proposed developments having the potential to generate large volumes of traffic, either as a result of operations or employment J. Temporary Construction Structures and Utilities: 1. Construction activities shall be in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local land disturbing regulations. 2. Site access shall be restricted to one location on the public street 3. Temporary construction structures, portable offices and other related facilities shall be maintained in good condition and arranged in a compact and organized manner on the site. Facilities shall be situated so that they are unobtrusive and attractive when seen from the road or adjacent properties. All temporary structures and portable facilities shall be removed upon the completion of construction activity and before petn-vanent occupancy of the building. 4. All temporary construction utilities shall be in a single, unobtrusive alignment. Distribution to the various areas of construction shall be from an approved, on-site location 5. Areas for the storage of construction equipment and materials shall be coordinated and be visually unobtrusive from the public road and adjacent properties. Mobile equipment shall be aligned in an orderly manner at the end of each work day. 6. Construction debris shall not be allowed to accumulate during construction. It shall be removed daily or located in a visually screened place if debris is to be removed less frequently. Open burning of debris is not permitted. After construction is complete, any temporary barriers, surplus materials, and all trash and debris shall be removed from the site. All backfill materials shall be cleared of any building materials, stone, or debris. K Design and Maintenance of Common Public Areas Standards for Greenways and Trails: Trails and greenways established in the Center shall be constructed in accordance with County adopted recreational standards. Trails shall be a minimum of four feet in width and shall have paved or stabilized surfaces to provide safe surfaces for users and minimize erosion Steep trails may be constructed with an earth surface using appropriate construction techniques to minimizeP erosion. 2. Maintenance of Common Public Areas: All public areas used by businesses and visitors shall be maintained and kept in a safe and attractive condition Where there is joint use of facilities, such as trails or open space areas across private areas, public access and maintenance shall be negotiated under separate agreement with the County Administrator and the Center property owner. 18 �'.. e.� H tl`�R*La4 a <+d '.� r4yl„4 4f0i'1,G 1i W 4 Site I Applicants Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et a/ Roanoke County N Existing Zoning: PTD & R 1 Department of Proposed Zoning. PTD Tax Map Number: 54.00-1-2, 64.1-5-2, 064.1-5-1, 54.00-1-2.1, 63.00-1-1 Community Development Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 479.55+/- Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: V = 1000' Land Use Conservation Rural Preserve Rural Village Ullage Center Development Neighborhood Conservation Transition Core Principal lndusthal 4 Site I Applicants Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et a/ Roanoke County N Existing Zoning: PTD & R 1 Department of Proposed Zoning. PTD Tax Map Number: 54.00-1-2, 64.1-5-2, 064.1-5-1, 54.00-1-2.1, 63.00-1-1 Community Development Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 479.55+/- Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: V = 1000' RECEIVED f n 2007 February 20, 2007 PAGE..........*V. Teresa Becher, PE Transportation Engineering Manager, County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Master Plan Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report Roanoke County HSMM Commission No. 30181 Dear Ms. Becher: Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the draft Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Master Plan Traffic Impact Analysis report for your review and comment. Copies of this report have also been submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation for their review. Upon receipt of your comments, we will incorporate any needed revisions and prepare final reports. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to give me a call at (540) 857-3322. Sincerely, HSMM 1 I A J. Scott Hodge, PE Project Manager JSH/akcb Enclosures: As noted C: David Hill, Hill Studio, PC (w/ enclosure) Hayes, $eay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc. ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS D�, ,oAA/, o ---- L„ vo OAMA TAI SAn RSA2inn -,Fwd: L Phili Thom son Fwd. RCCRT-Draft TIA Submitted 2-20-07 v Page 1 From: Teresa Becher To: Philip Thompson Date: 3/13/2007 5:01:52 PM Subject: Fwd: RCCRT-Draft TIA Submitted 2-20-07 FYI >>> "Anne Booker" <abooker@hsmm.com> 2/21/2007 11:08:28 AM >>> Good morning, We have discovered a small change in the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis submitted in draft form on February 20, 2007. In Table 8.1 - Required Left Turn Treatments, no left turn treatments are required for the northbound or southbound approach at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive for either the AM or PM peak hour. This change will be incorporated into the final report revisions. The text following this table as well as the text contained in the conclusions will be modified accordingly. Additionally, we will include the Twine Hollow Road approach (at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive) in the analysis with the final submittal. We have investigated the turn lane requirements and capacity analysis with the inclusion of this approach. No additional turn lanes are required with the inclusion of this approach. The levels of service for the eastbound (Twine Hollow Road) and westbound (Glenmary Drive) approaches are still acceptable with no less than LOS D is design year 2022 with acceptable v/c ratios. I apologize for any inconvenience these two revisions have caused. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know. Thanks, Anne Anne K.C. Booker, PE, PTOE HSMM 1315 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24016 (540) 857-3326 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Development................................................... 3.0 Proposed Development............................................................................................................. 1 4.0 Existing Volumes...................................................................................................................... 2 5.0 Projected Growth Rates............................................................................................................ 2 6.0 Projected Development Volumes............................................................................................. 4 7.0 Pass -By Trip Adjustment.......................................................................................................... 6 8.0 Geometric Improvements.......................................................................................................... 7 8.1 Left Turn Lanes............................................................................................................. 7 8.2 Right Turn Lanes.......................................................................................................... 8 9.0 Capacity Analysis..................................................................................................................... 9 10.0 Turn Lane Improvements and Capacity Analysis without the Dow Hollow Connection .....10 11.0 Conclusions........................................................................................................................... 12 HSMM i February 20, 2007 } 1 1 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology DRAFT Traffic Impact Analysis 1 List of Figures Figure 5.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Background Volumes ............................ 4 Figure 5.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Background Volumes ............................. 4 Figure 6.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................... 6 Figure 6.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................... 6 Figure 10.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection................................................................................. 10 Figure 10.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection................................................................................. 11 ' List of Tables 1 1 Table 4.1 -Current AADT Volumes Reported by VDOT.................................................................2 Table 4.2 -Directional Distribution on Dow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive..................................2 Table 4.3 -Directional Distribution on Glenmary Drive...................................................................2 1 Table 5.1 -Dow Hollow Road - Historic Traffic Data .................. .................................... 3 i Table 5.2-Prunty Drive - Historic Traffic Data...............................................................................3 1 Table 5.3 Glenmary Drive - Historic Traffic Data..........................................................................3 Table 6.1 -Entering and Exiting Vehicle Volumes...........................................................................5 1 Table 8.1 -Required Left Turn Treatments.........................................8 .............................................. Table 8.2 -Required Right Turn Treatments.....................................................................................8 1 Table 9.1-HCM Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections......................................9 Table 9.2 -Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results...............................................................10 1 Table 10.1 -Required Left Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow ......................................................................... 1 Road Connection ........................... ......11 1 Table 10.2 -Required Right Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow 1 Road Connection..........................................................................................................12 Table 10.3 -Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results.............................................................12 1 1 Appendix 1 1 Appendix A -Proposed Development Layout Appendix B -Trip Generation 1 Appendix C -Figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual 1 Appendix D -HCS Analysis s A HSMM ii February 20, 2007 t� Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT 1.0 Introduction HSMM was commissioned by Hill Studio, PC to perform a traffic impact analysis for the updated master plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology development in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. This development includes light manufacturing and general office facilities. Two facilities are currently in operation within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton. The Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is located adjacent to I-81, Exit 132. Glenmary Drive currently serves as the only access to the park. A future connection from Dow Hollow Road is planned for the park. This report includes a description of the existing and proposed development, discussion of existing and projected volumes in the study area, examination of geometric improvements, and capacity analysis. Sight distance analysis was not performed as a portion of this study. This report supersedes the previous reports for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. 2.0 Existing Development Two facilities are currently in operation within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology: Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton. Tecton currently employs 20 people who work from 6:30 AM to 6:45 PM. Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. currently employs 80 people who work from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Future expansion is planned for each of these facilities. This expansion is discussed in later sections of this report. Speed limits are not posted for Dow Hollow Road, Prunty Drive or Glenmary Drive. In 2003, Glenmary Drive was reconstructed to provide an improved connection to the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. The design speed utilized for the reconstruction was 40 miles per hour. 3.0 Proposed Development At full buildout, the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is planned to include an additional facility for Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., an additional Tecton building, and six additional lots. Per conversations with Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., additional employees are not projected for their existing facility. The same number of employees (80 employees) is projected for their future second facility. The hours of operation for their second facility are projected to be the same as their existing hours of operation, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Per conversations with Tecton, the full buildout of their facility (including the additional building facilities) will accommodate 200 employees. A second shift will run with the additional employees. The hours of operation for the second shift will be 6:30 PM to 6:45 AM. The proposed master plan is included in Appendix A. Future employment levels were provided by Hill Studio, PC for the vacant lots. Based on relative lot size, lots 2, 4 and 5 will accommodate manufacturing buildings which are the approximately the same size as the full buildout of Tecton. Lot I will accommodate a building three times as large as the full buildout of Tecton. Lots 3 and 6 will be general office buildings. Based on allowable lot coverage rates, lot 3 will have an 80,000 square foot building. Lot 6 is somewhat remote in location and is not HSMM 1 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT expected to accommodate a large facility. This lot was assumed to accommodate a general office building which would employ 100 people. Trip projections for the future buildout of the park are based on these employment levels. 4.0 ]Existing Volumes Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and are reported in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 -Current AADT Volumes Reported by VDOT Road Volume (Vehicles per Day) Dow Hollow Road 110 Glenmary Drive 426 Prunty Drive 104 Based on the current employment levels of Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. (80 employees), the peak hour of Glenmary Drive is expected to represent twenty percent of the AADT. The peak hour of Dow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive is estimated as ten percent of the AADT. The directional distributions along the network for AM and PM peak hours are shown in Tables 4.2 and 4.3. The directional distribution for Glenmary Drive is estimated using the entering and exiting percentages for the general office land use contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual as discussed in a later section. Table 4.2 -Directional Distribution on Dow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive Peak Hour Northbound Percentage Southbound Percentage AM 50% 50% PM 50% 50% Table 4.3 -Directional Distribution on Glenmary Drive Peak Eastbound Westbound Hour Percentage Percentage AM 88% 12% PM 17% 83% 5.0 Projected Growth Rates The historic Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes available from VDOT were examined for Dow Hollow Road, Prunty Drive and Glenmary Drive. The AADT for Dow Hollow Road was 100 vehicles per day in 2000 and 110 vehicles per day in 2006. From this data, a growth rate of 1.6 percent was computed. The AADT for Prunty Drive was 80 vehicles per day in 2000 and 104 vehicles per day in 2006. From this data a growth rate of 4.5 percent HSMM 2 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology s Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT was computed. This rate was deemed to be excessive given the lack of development along x Prunty Drive. Therefore the growth rate established along Dow Hollow Road was used as a more representative growth rate for the area. AADT data was not available prior to 2006 for Glenmary Drive. There has been no development along Glenmary Drive in recent years. Growth associated with the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology will be accounted for within the trip projection rates discussed in a later section. Therefore, the consistent 1.6 percent annual growth rate was assumed for Glenmary Drive based on the data available for Dow Hollow Road. Tables 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 summarize VDOT reported AADTs by year as well as the quality of the reported AADTs. Table 5.1 -Dow Hollow Road - Historic Traffic Data Year Volume (Vehicles per Day) Type of Count 2001 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2002 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2003 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2004 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2005 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2006 110 Actual Count Data, 2006 Table 5.2-Prunty Drive - Historic Traffic Data Year Volume (Vehicles per Day) Type of Count 2001 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2002 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2003 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2004 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2005 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2006 104 Actual Count Data, 2006 Table 5.3-Glenmary Drive - Historic Traffic Data Year Volume Type of Count (Vehicles per Day) 2006 426 Actual Count Data, 2006 A design year of 2022 was utilized for this analysis based on direction by Hill Studio, PC and the County of Roanoke. Design year background traffic volumes are depicted in Figures 5.1 and 5.2 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. m HSN/1M 3 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT L, O CO O —0 L r-92 Twine Hollow Road —1 + F 6 1 Glenrnary Drive 2—J cD CO co 12- 0 2-0 Figure 5.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Background Volumes v U L N U �L O T L O zi L O d- U W O L 0 CO O L O L — 85 —1 L —0 Lo O c0 O —0 L F13 Twins (4,11—, P—H I IF 6 J Glenmary Drive 90—J o 00 11, 90— 0_.. SLG N D T a L co o Lo _.__i L -- 6 U L U m O L O a- 0 0 U co oI L 0 - i i_. -- 0 Figure 5.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Background Volumes 6.0 Projected Development Volumes Future development within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is proposed to be a combination of general office and manufacturing land uses. Trip generation was performed for these land uses using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7t' Edition. The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides two methodologies for projecting trips associated with development. Users can select the average trip rate per unit of measure or a fitted curve equation. The average trip rate represents the weighted average of available data. The regression equation represents the mathematical relationship between the unit of measure and measured vehicle trips. This equation is developed as the "best fit" line of HSMM 4 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT available data. When both the average trip rate and regression equation are available, it is desirable to utilize the regression equation. For most traffic impact analyses, the AM and PM peak hours of the adjacent streets are utilized for analysis. The AM peak hour of adjacent streets typically occurs between 7:00-9:00 AM. The PM peak hour of adjacent streets typically occurs between 4:00-6:00 PM. For this study, the AM and PM hours of operation for each of the existing facilities was examined to determine the period of highest traffic volumes. The shift start time for Tecton is before a normal AM peak hour period. Additionally, the shift end time for Tecton is after a normal PM peak hour period. Therefore the trips associated with employees entering and exiting the Tecton facility has not been included in the AM or PM peak hour totals. The Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. facility operates on a schedule similar to normal office operating hours. Therefore, the trips associated with future office buildout are assumed to coincide with the AM and PM peak hour periods of Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. The trips associated with the current operations of Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. are included in the existing background traffic volumes. The future manufacturing land uses are expected to operate on a shift schedule similar to the existing Tecton facility. While the exact hours of operation for each facility remain unknown, it can be assumed that the hours will not coincide with AM and PM peak hour of adjacent streets. In order to be conservative, an assumption that fifty percent of the manufacturing trips would occur in the AM and PM peak hour of adjacent streets was made. Therefore, the total trips reported for the AM and PM peak hour includes 100 percent of the general office land use trips and fifty percent of the manufacturing land use trips. None of the future Tecton trips were included since the hours of shift operations are known and do not coincide with the AM or PM peak hour of adjacent streets. For the future development, the volume of entering and exiting vehicles was determined using the entering and exiting trip distribution as reported by the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 6.1 reports the total number of entering and exiting vehicles for each of the peak hours studied. Detailed existing trip data and trip generation tables are provided in Appendix B. Table 6.1 -Entering and Exiting Vehicle Volumes Peak Hour Vehicles Entering Exiting Total AM Peak of Adjacent Streets 523 113 636 PM Peak of Adjacent Streets 181 504 685 The projected development trips were distributed to the two entrances to the park. Sixty percent of the trips are projected to enter and exit using Glenmary Drive. The remaining forty percent of the trips are projected to enter and exit using Dow Hollow Road. The projected traffic volumes for the full buildout of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology are depicted in Figures 6.1 and 6.2 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. HSMM 5 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology DRAFT Traffic Impact Analysis These volumes include existing traffic volumes, projected background traffic volumes and projected trips associated with the full buildout of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. n 0 U) O -11L Twine Hollow Road a 0 3 O O S O 0 7 1 f" O Il- N N h'� N 0 T C L co o L o --- 153 Q) U L U N L O a_ U LO O O 0 -_J L — 47 6J Glenmary Drive 100- 326 -- 226—.- Figure 6.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes I RA O L 0 O N O —0 1 L F315 N �L T c n Co O I Lo ---3o8 U L U Ql O L O f1 O U [O O 0 --224 Twine Ho low oa I »� 1 F 6 J Glenmary Drive 121-1 Q 0 a 199— 77,- N Figure 6.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes If additional development or revised land uses are proposed, the trip generation for this project should be reevaluated. 7.0 Pass -By Trip Adjustment Trips projected to enter and exit the site are a combination of new trips to the area and trips diverted from the adjacent street network. The trips that are diverted from the adjacent street HSMM 6 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT network are pass -by trips. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook provides pass -by trip estimations for specific land uses which may experience this phenomenon such as drive-in banks, supermarkets, high -turnover restaurants and the like. There are no such land uses proposed for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology and no adjustments were made to the volumes along Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road. 8.0 Geometric Improvements On two-lane and four -lane roads, vehicles slowing or stopping to turn create a hazard for other vehicles. This hazard increases as the number of turning vehicles increases. The VDOT Road Design Manual provides guidelines for turn lanes on two-lane and four -lane highways. These requirements are based on the design speed, turning volume, approach volume and opposing volume. Due to the highly directional nature of the proposed development, required geometric improvements were examined for both the projected AM and PM peak hour buildout traffic volumes. The required improvements based on the projected volumes are summarized in the following sections. 8.1 Left Turn Lanes Glenmary Drive does not have a posted speed limit. The reconstruction project completed in 2003 was designed with a design speed of 40 miles per hour. Experience shows that the 85th percentile running speed, which is commonly used to establish design requirements, can be expected to exceed the posted speed by approximately five miles per hour. The left turn lane warrant charts for 40 miles per hour operating/design speed for two-lane highways were utilized for this analysis. 0 Figures C-1-1.1 thru C-1-1.7 Warrants for Left -Turn Storage Lanes on Four -Lane and Two -Lane 0 Highways of the VDOT Road Design Manual were used to determine the required turn lane configurations for the intersections on the study network. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 8.1. The applicable figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual are included in Appendix C. A HSMM 7 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Table 8.1 -Required Left Turn Treatments Peak Hour Intersection Approach Improvement Required Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper NB No Left Turn Required 47�/j t �1�1 SB Radius Only Required SB T •-.�'+bvrt�iZ1I17Tu.uv r.'...1'-T---�-* WB Radius Only Required Glenmary Drive and WB Radius Only Required orage equire Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle WB Radius Only Required T af�- •r „-., r '+i. inn � WB Radius Only Required Dow Hollow Road NB PM SB � ,� rY'TiTl'PTTT7�T1�NT7T1 T�'fTTr of�te ' AM Glenmary Drive and Prunty Drive EB No Left Turn Required PM No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle EB No Left Turn Required PM _ No Left Turn Required The only turn lanes required based on the design year 2022 projected buildout volumes are at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. However, based on the existing roadway configuration and the limited space for improvement based on the VDOT limited access line, the addition of turn lanes will be difficult to construct. Additionally, the current roadway configuration includes a shared left turn -through lane and a shared through -right turn lane. The need for a left lane is diminished based on the existence of two lanes on the northbound approach. Left turn movements onto Twine Hollow Road (directly across from Glenmary Drive) and delay associated with turning vehicles are expected to be minimal. The roadway section of Dow Hollow Road transitions immediately after the intersection with Glenmary Drive from a four -lane section to a two-lane section. 8.2 Right Turn Lanes Figure C-1-8 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (2 -Lane Highway) and Figure C-1-9 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (4 -Lane Highway) of the VDOT Road Design Manual were used to determine the required turn lane configurations for the intersections on the study network. The results of these analyses are delineated in Table 8.2. The applicable figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual are included in Appendix C. Table 8.2 -Required Right Turn Treatments Peak Hour Intersection Approach Improvement Required AM Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required PM NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and Prunty Drive WB Radius Only Required PM WB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle WB Radius Only Required PM WB Radius Only Required HSMM 8 February 20, 2007 d Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT The only turn lanes required based on the design year 2022 projected buildout volumes are at the intersection, of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. As noted previously, a right turn lane on the northbound approach will be difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line. Additionally, the current roadway configuration includes a shared left turn -through lane and a share through -right turn lane. The need for a right turn lane is diminished based on the existence of two lanes on the northbound approach and the minimal delay expected to be associated with right turning vehicles. If desired, the shared through -right turn lane could be restriped to provide a dedicated right turn lane onto Glenmary Drive since the lane drops just after the intersection currently. 9.0 Capacity Analysis Highway Capacity Software (HCS) is based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. For unsignalized intersections, the delay experienced by the stop controlled approach is used to determine level of service (LOS). The LOS designation is a descriptive measure of operating conditions on a scale of A (best) to F (worst). Table 9.1 delineates the LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. In rural conditions, LOS C or D is considered acceptable. The v/c ratio is a measure of the approach volume to available approach capacity. As this value approaches 1.0, improvements to provide additional capacity should be investigated. 'fable 9.1-11CM bevel of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS Average Control Delay per Vehicle (SecondsNehicle) A <10 B > 10-15 C >15-25 D > 25-35 E > 35-50 F > 50 The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the design year 2022 buildout conditions. Based on the difficulty of adding the geometric improvements discussed previously, no additional turn lanes or storage were assumed to be in place for the buildout conditions. Table 9.2 summarizes the LOS, delay and v/c ratio results for each studied intersection. HSMM 9 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Table 9.2 -Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results Peak Intersection Approach LOS Delay v/c Hour U rr AM Glenmary Drive and C 15.5 0.32 Q Dow Hollow Road WB PM C 20.8 0.58 AM Glenmary Drive and O A 9.1 0.01 o Prunty Drive SB ❑ � U PM A 10.0 0.01 AM Glenmary Drive and A 8.9 0.10 Corporate Circle SB PM A 9.9 0.10 Each of the study network intersections is projected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the design year 2022 buildout conditions. Each of the stop controlled intersections operate with LOS C or better without any additional geometric improvements. Additionally, the v/c ratio for each approach is very low. Detailed reports from HCS for these intersections are included in Appendix D. 10.0 Turn Lane Improvements and Capacity Analysis without the Dow Hollow Connection As a follow-up to the previous analysis, the roadway network capacity was examined without the construction of the Dow Hollow Road connection. The proposed connection to the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology using Dow Hollow Road will require significant grading and is expected to have a significant construction cost. For study purposes, the required geometric improvements if this connection were not constructed as well as the level of service at each of the network intersections were investigated. Figures 10.1 and 10.2 delineate the design year 2022 projected volumes for the AM and PM peak hour buildout conditions, respectively. -- o t o coo co 0 0 r o L q f L F 205 L 198 L -- 79 Twine Hollow Road { F 6-1 Glenmary Drive 158-1 I00 535— 377— Figure 10.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection HSMM 10 February 20, 2007 a � O U rr Q L 0 a O 3 a o � o ❑ � U -- o t o coo co 0 0 r o L q f L F 205 L 198 L -- 79 Twine Hollow Road { F 6-1 Glenmary Drive 158-1 I00 535— 377— Figure 10.1 -Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection HSMM 10 February 20, 2007 a 0 Q Q O L C d i L D owo 0 1 L 517 Twine Hollow Road ++ r I I CD w cc r` N co o L 0 L 510 L U L Q 2- 0 0 U r ` 2 o I- 0 L — 373 6 � Glenmary Drive 142-1 271--- 129 Figure 10.2 -Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection Tables 10.1 and 10.2 delineate the required left and right turn lane geometric improvements if the Dow Hollow Road connection is not constructed. Table 10.3 delineates the level of service and delay of each of the network intersections if the Dow Hollow Road connection is not constructed. Table 10.1 -Required Left Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow Road Connection Peak Hour Intersection Approach Left Turn Improvement AM Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road NB No Left Turn Required SB No Left Turn Required PM NB No Left Turn Required SB No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and Prunty Drive EB No Left Turn Required PM EB No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle EB Left Turn Lane with 100 ft of Storage Required PM TTC"K,fAif 11 February 20. 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Table 10.2 -Required Right Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow Road Connection Peak Hour Intersection Approach Left 'Turn Improvement AM Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required PM NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and Prunty Drive WB Radius Only Required PM WB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle WB Radius Only Required PM Radius Only Required Table 10.3 -Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results Peak Hour Intersection Approach LOS Delay v/c AM Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road WB B 13.2 0.32 PM C 17.7 0.65 AM Glenmary Drive and Prunty Drive SB A 9.3 0.01 pM B 11.5 0.01 AM Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle SB A 9.2 0.12 PM B 11.7 0.20 If Dow Hollow connection were not constructed, the only geometric improvement required is a northbound right turn lane and taper at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. As discussed previously, this improvement will be difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line at the interchange. With the existing roadway network configuration, the level of service and v/c ratios at each of the network intersections remains acceptable. No less than LOS C is expected for any stop controlled approach on the network. 11.0 Conclusions HSMM examined the projected increase in traffic volumes associated with the proposed buildout of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology and identified geometric improvements which may be required as well as completed capacity analyses for the design year 2022 buildout conditions. Based on the VDOT Road Design Manual, a left and right turn lane may be required for the northbound approach to the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. This improvement will be very difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line. Additionally, the northbound approach currently includes a shared left -through lane and a shared through -right turn lane. Therefore, the delay associated with turning vehicles is diminished and turn lane improvements may not be required. If desired, the shared through -right turn lane could HSMM 12 February 20, 2007 E 0 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT mom G� be restriped to provide a dedicated right turn lane onto Glenmary Drive since the lane drops just after the intersection currently. No other operational or geometric improvements are expected to be required for the proposed development due to the acceptable levels of service and capacity at each intersection. If additional development or revised land uses are proposed, the trip generation for this project should be reevaluated. HSMM 13 February 20, 2007 N Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Appendix A Proposed Development Layout r HSMM February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Appendix B Trip Generation HSMM February 20, 2007 I A on � a � o i:+ O 000 0 _ N d bD � U a Cd tj x cd N N N N N M N W d � w a �D z 00 00 00 00 co cu� Oh b O W CD N FbA F C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U h [� oo h h DO o0 h C L. Wd a Li b C. cs t o . o h v, C) O h O 00 O 00 V ba to v7 d N N 00 oO 00 00 + 00 00 00 oO C) + N aS eC Go 00 C� X o0 0o X � ?< M 07 7G M 00 a0 0000 X M i< M 00 10 00 O O q N b a a •3 �3 O � r-. cc o 0 � a b O � O � Y � c0 wQ) a C13 o w a, 0 0 a% �o o �o �o rjl C I'D if) 00 tr) Un N bo a b u N y •� O F"+ to M M O U U aCUC N r+ d '� 4) Ri b Go G o •� 0 u w 0 Cd 0 -0�' -7F o as o Cl) kr) q `10CIS i N a wG .2 ? � N H w w 0 0 M N 00 -4 O1 Oo IT H o 0 N N U a Cd tj OD � w U b b O N C. Cd Li 0 ba N x N aS J ¢ yN q N b O � r-. o 0 � 0 b O � O � c0 C13 o � b N SOD N y •� O F"+ to M M �+•� m M N r+ O w 0 Cd 0 -0�' o as W q `10CIS a wG .2 =v � N H w w v H A4 on u o 0 .pd N I� [� l� 00 00 O L O N ,� O N U cdR C13 d bA � bA o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ko 00 00 �r .k �° Go ko io 00 00 110 m u bD y 'C b cn m U bL bA N o 0 0 0- o 0 0 �10 �10 r- �o �o r- t W d a b 0 u C, p M U 00 ON °l� � 0 O �n o �o o O 00 N Q Y 7G U 00 a1 00 `-"' 00 al 00 00 O QJ V H ti � r--1 rti H p• � oo 0 ao 0 N o0 0 00 � Jai O O .•, O O p Z 3 3 O U U w o by i�� A b T1 Cd O o � 0 cV CL U tD. U OCd �. Y 'Cd a w c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cc, p ci q h O ti0 O r cl O 00 Vl .mow b S U a U Ti U U c ° c H S7 kn r-+ a3 w O y 00 00 O 'd 0 OLn .cc coll O O o O � to 1p O U o n ° � z 2 (D o 0 N O L O N U cdR C13 bA ,D .k u u 'C b U N 0 a� Y 7G .� QJ V H p• � N � M Y O U U w o o � 0 OCd �. 'Cd � b O b U a U Ti U U ° H S7 kn r-+ d - w O y 00 00 O 'd 0 OLn .cc coll O cd o 8 o n ° P, O cd 0p bD � 0A K O u o UD g Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Appendix C Figures from the VD®T Road Design Manual r 5 HSMM February 20, 2007 i Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Figure C-1-1-2 Warrant for Left Turn Storage Lanes on Four -Lane Highways 6 -IN V1 FIGURE C-1-1.1 WARRANT FOR. LEFT TURN STORAGE LANES ON Fri URINE HSMM C-2 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Figures C-1-1-2 to C-1-1.7 Warrants for Left -Turn Storage Lanes on Two -Lane Highways LU ?` U,J r }00 b t'1 4 0 C _ •�dj47 0 L1.2 ..•.cera-d,cal,a,.o L+- a .:{k trna' lc • --sT'.�arsEh cw�lr�,l L - n k C)Q 4CO 60,3 3G0 '100rs FIGURE Q-1-1,2 n9?1t+.,d. Snt.. r-- ' l._ -.m 9 - �:Cuaa4t L-eeuyLL%ryfi.9:vd V - d: sill-, r. =$,3= atfn9:C 3--9n :;V—; I L :,4k •:} iC7`i 400 60 BOC 1:} FIGURE G -1,l,;3 HSNfM C-3 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT 0--UL..nj urj L =.94 Em.a ra mr r i —m 7t) LF -J 6 0, IS" 0 3 I Z3 4001 rr 7.1 D 14, I r 01 .43fr-Tu rn t 2G,0Ltina Rcquired: J-11 - Q7 '7 1 10 a I .11 — — ----- ------ 4 G GOD A0, V A N C I N G VOLUME (VPF9) FIGURE C-1-1,4 700 500 300 ,1 2 D C1 100 j L L�ff�Tr em n e q U r A N rJ 200 4 O'C' 600 800 10-00 Vh,. A D V A N C I Iq 10 V 10%,10 ivA � 1V PH FJ GURE C-1.1.5 HSMM C-4 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT v s 46 ph ;nS-*r9 kin-, Ms 1 -;if, > L IL JX i II im I'd I i C_ -7 .4 Lc n �e Ri� 10 alb 2 0 Q 4 D 0 60.0. 80,0 1 oo 0 14 A- D V ha S I N G L u M E V P M FIGURE= C. I - 1 6 7 DO- > I VI NI J— L 5 U 0 > % 4 Q 7 7—r— Izj ,2 o u r s3ne S` Re 'Liu r 4a II i I fit I I I I I 1 VA AW -1 A IN Cl N G V0-_UjN,.E (vi: - Hit FIGURE C-1-1,7' HSMM C-5 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis Figure C-1-8 Guidelines for Right 'Turn 'Treatment (2 -Lane Highway) u?n 7 L•'J +- r W—tri7TH TUr�r C - 4qE AND TAFEii P.EQ P! _.7 ��-'x -� s � ••yrs- � �M.-. - 1� �a GD - TARER REQUIRED ;;... r.,.,.,... < ,"kms YvY- ?er ti.. II _ r 7 iCi L�19 =_ti i?.J SGiI a'UJ a I•: -x A;PPROAC:,-i TOTAL, YEMOLESS f=f1 HCUR Figure C-1-9 Guidelines for Right 'Turn Treatment (4 -Lane Highway) F, qd 20 r �P_ tJ� - RAZ -_:d F=GUIFIEQ 2T aX E -CC Zca I a33 1 h,V Af.? dr,H r -F27, Hc-.?, -i Ma ACC DRAFT HSMM C-6 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology ` Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Appendix ]D HCS Analysis HSMM February 20, 2007 f a 0 F Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Design Year 2022 AM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions HSMM February 20, 2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 Rights Reserved Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period HSMM 2/16/2007 AM Peak Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year DH GD 2022 Buildout AM Roanoke County 2022 Buildout Project Descri tion Roa Co Center for Research and chnolo2z Master Plan T1A East/West Street: Glenmaty Drive North/South Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South lStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 217 332 0 53 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 217 1 332 0 1 53 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 160 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 160 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (vph) 0 0 160 0 C (m)(vph) 1551 1017 504 Ic 0.00 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 1.38 Control Delay 7.3 8.5 15.5 LOS A A C Approach Delay -- -- 15.5 pproach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f Two -Tay Stop Control HCS2000TM Version 4.1f Page 2 of 2 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. HSMM Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Page 1 of 2 Intersection GD PD 2022 Buildout AM Jurisdiction Roanoke Count Analysis Year 2022 Buildout Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and chnology Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h 6 326 0 0 153 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 6 326 0 0 153 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 6 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1428 893 /c ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS A A Approach delay __ 9A s/veh A Approach LOS V—i— 4.1'' HCS2000TM uopyrngm y wu3 um --y — . ,v„ , ...,. -_ 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst Agency/Co. [211612007 SMM Date Performed Analysis Time Period M Peak Page 1 of 2 Intersection GD CC 2022 Buildout AM Jurisdiction Roanoke Count Analysis Year 2022 Buildout North/South Street: Corporate Circle Project Descri tion Roa Co Center for Research and chnology Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Corporate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 100 226 0 0 47 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 100 226 0 0 47 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 0 -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 D Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 105 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 105 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 100 105 Capacity, cm (vph) 1560 1022 /c ratio 0.06 0.10 Queue length (95%) 0.21 0.34 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 8.9 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh 8.9 pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f r:l_.//C'.\T%,,,.,.,0„+�9�onan,i°/�f1CPtt;nac\ahnnker\T ,cal%ZOSettin�siTemnil 3\0.kC fmn 2/20/2 A i Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Design Year 2022 PM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions HSM- February 20, 2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 Rights Reserved Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period HSMM 2/16/2007 PM Peak Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year DH_GD 2022 Buildout PM Roanoke County 2022 Buildout Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolo Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South lStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and A gustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 80 206 0 210 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 80. 206 0 210 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 315 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 315 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (vph) 0 0 315 0 C (m) (vph) 1358 1273 541 lc 0.00 0.00 0.58 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 4.04 Control Delay 7.7 7.8 20.8 LOS A A C Approach Delay -- -- 20.8 pproach LOS I-- -- C Rights Reserved Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f r Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 a HCS2000TM Version 4.1f r� fila•//C•\Tlnnnmantc�/7nAnC��%n �.(1Cettin �s\ahnnker\ a Two -Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst KCB Agency/Co. HSMM Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Page 1 of 2 Intersection GD PD 2022 Buildout PM Jurisdiction Roanoke Count Analysis Year 2022 Buildout Major Street Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and chnology Master Plan T1A East/West Street: Glenmaj Drive North/South Street: Prunt Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West lStudv Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 6 199 0 0 308 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 1.00 6 1.00 199 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 308 1.00 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 2 -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1253 732 /c ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 10.0 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version +. i t Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL. SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection GD CC 2022 Buildout PM enc /Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke Count Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolo2zMaster Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenm5l Drive North/South Street: Cor orate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 121 77 0 0 224 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 121 77 0 0 224 0 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHv 2 0 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes Configuration==L 1 1 T 0 0 1 0 TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 85 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 85 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Percent grade (%) 0 0 0 0 2 0 -2 2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Control Delav, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 121 85 Capacity, cm (vph) 1345 816 /c ratio 0.09 0.10 Queue length (95%) 0.30 0.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 9.9 2/20/200 i Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh -- -- 9.9 Approach LOS -- -- A HCS200011n Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. if I Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology n Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Design Year 2022 AM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions Without the Dow Hollow Road Connection 'r � HSMM February 20, 2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 Rights Reserved TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period HSMM 2116/2007 AM Peak Intersection Jurisdiction nalysis Year DH_GD 2022 Buildout AM wo DH Roanoke County 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolo Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 8 541 0 8 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 8 541 0 8 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type 2 -- -- 2 Undivided -- -- RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 205 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 205 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (vph) 0 0 205 0 C (m) (vph) 1611 1017 644 lc 0.00 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 1.39 Control Delay 7.2 8.5 13.2 LOS Approach Delay A -- A -- B 13.2 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 KCS2000TM copyright© 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f Version 4.1 f nd%20Settinas\abooker\Local%2OSettin.izs\Temp\13\u2k2.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Jay Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information GD PD 2022 Buildout AM Analyst — II I«I ZIULAIUI J wo DH Agency/Co._ HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn Analysis Time Period AM Peak nncuments%20and%20Settmas\abooker\Local%20Settinp_,s\Temp\13\u2kl2.tmp 2/20/2007 1 I 1 Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and chnolouz Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenma Drive North/South Street: PruntZ Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 6 535 0 0 198 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 6 535 0 0 198 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 6 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHv 2 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1375 843 /c ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 nncuments%20and%20Settmas\abooker\Local%20Settinp_,s\Temp\13\u2kl2.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 9.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 A LOS A A pproach delay __ 9.3 s/veh A pproach LOS I-- -- �. Version4.11 HCS2000TM Uopyngnc v tow uu.vecs..y .,. r,v -1 „ r,li.� - Tamm\12\„71x77+__ )/)0Mnnl Two -Way Stop Control Mage 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. HSMM Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection GD_CC 2022 Buildout AM wo DH Jurisdiction Roanoke County Analysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn IStudy Period Proiect Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technology Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenma Drive North/South Street: Cor orate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 158 377 0 0, 79 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 158 377 0 0 79 0 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 119 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 119 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 158 119 Capacity, cm (vph) 1519 981 /c ratio 0.10 0.12 Queue length (95%) 0.35 0.41 file: //S:\Documents%20and%20Settin..Rs\abooker\Local%20Settintrs\Temp\13\u2kA.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.2 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh --9 2 pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. If file:HS:\Documents%20and%20S Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis Design Year 2022 PM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions Without the Dow Hollow Road Connection HSMM February 20, 2007 i Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 i [General TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period HSMM 2/16/2007 PM Peak Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year DH_GD 2022 Buildout PM wo H D Roanoke County 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolo2z Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenma Drive North/South Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 8 278 0 8 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 8 278 0 8 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 517 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 517 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (vph) 0 0 517 0 C (m) (vph) 1611 1273 797 lc 0.00 0.00 0.65 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 5.34 Control Delay 7.2 7.8 17.7 LOS A A C pproach Delay -- -- 17.7 pproach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved file://S:\Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\13\u2k6.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f Version 4.1f as\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\l3\u2k6.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information GD PD 2022 Buildout PM Analyst Agency/Co. HSMM Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection wo DH Jurisdiction Roanoke County Analysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn East/West Street: Glenmaj Drive file://S:\Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\13\u2kl6.tmp 2/20/2007 i Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolog Master Plan TIA file://S:\Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\13\u2kl6.tmp 2/20/2007 Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technolog Master Plan TIA East/West Street: Glenmaj Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h) 6 271 0 0 510 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 6 271 0 0 510 0 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 6 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1055 564 /c ratio 0.01 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.03 file://S:\Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\13\u2kl6.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 11.5 LOS A 8 Approach delay 11.5 s/veh pproach LOS -- -- 8 Vnrcinn 4 11 HCS2000TM Copyrnght Uc 2UUj university or rionaa, nu n Yiu n-- t 1 r_i...rir.�n..,,,,,.,.,o„+r,oi�n�„ao/7nCattinac\ahnnkPr\T.nr.al%�.nSetti7ac\Temp\1'�\n�klf,tmn ?/?n/?nm Two -Way Stop Control neral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Intersection GD_CC 2022 Buildout PM wo DH Jurisdiction Roanoke Count Analysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn Analyst Agency/Co. HSMM Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Page 1 of 2 Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and chnologry Master Plan IIA East/West Street: Glenma Drive North/South Street: Corporate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 142 129 0 0 373 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 142 129 0 0 373 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 137 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 137 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 142 137 Capacity, cm (vph) 1185 673 /c ratio 0.12 0.20 Queue length (95%) 0.41 0.76 file: HS: \Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\13\u2kE.tmp 2/20/2007 Two -Jay Stop Control Page 2 of 2 HCS2000TM Copynght v 2uuj university ui rwiiva, n, . 6 ... ...... ..... file-//S:\Documents%20and%20Settings\abooker\Local%20Settings\Temp\l3\u2kE.tmp 2/20/2007 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2007 RESOLUTION 031307-2 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INITIATE AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND MASTER PLAN FOR THE PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT AT THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (CRT) WHEREAS, Section 30-14 of the Roanoke County Code and Section 15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia provide that whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires, an amendment to the zoning regulations or district maps may be initiated by resolution of the governing body; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff commenced an evaluation of the Master Plan and the conditions in order to monitor the effectiveness of these requirements as more extensive engineering and design had taken place and as businesses began to move into the Center for Research and Technology (CRT); and WHEREAS, County staff and the citizen design review team is recommending that the Board of Supervisors initiate by resolution the procedures to amend these covenants, conditions, and the Master Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the County Administrator, or his designee, be authorized to initiate an application to amend the covenants, conditions, and master plan for the Planned Technology District at the Center for Research and Technology. 2. That this application be submitted to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation, which shall be forwarded to the governing body. 3. That the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires these amendments. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Wray, Church, Altizer, Flora, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: �I 01 Diane S. Childers, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director, Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning 04 E F m i�M. z,M a 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2007-2008 budget and approval of the Classification Plan for fiscal year 2007-2008 SUBMITTED BY: Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge'067 . /�� County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The fiscal year 2007-2008 budget was presented to the Board of Supervisors on April 24, 2007. A public hearing was held on April 24, 2007, to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed budget and fiscal year 2008-2012 Capital Improvements Program. Attached for your approval is the Budget Appropriation Ordinance for fiscal year 2007-08. The total County budget is $346,227,964. This includes all inter -fund and intra -fund transfers. The budget net of transfers is $253,853,197. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The format of the appropriation ordinance conforms to the reporting basis used at year-end in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This presentation allows the same level of budget comparison as is required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for financial reporting purposes. This format will also consistently apply the appropriation on a fund basis for County funds as has been used to appropriate School funds in the past. Staff recommends approval of the first reading of the 2007-2008 fiscal year budget appropriation ordinance. Staff also recommends approval of the attached Classification Plan for fiscal year 2007-2008. The second reading and resolution adopting the budget is scheduled for May 8, 2007. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 2007-08 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on April 24, 2007, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 2007-08; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 8, 2007, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 25 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on April 24, 2007, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 8, 2007, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 2007, and ending June 30, 2008, for the functions and purposes indicated: County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2007-2008 Budget April 24, 2007 Revenues: $ 135,091,375 General Fund: 4,974,000 General Government $ 162,380,280 Comprehensive Services 6,580,006 E-911 Maintenance 477,958 Law Library 41,648 Life Skills Mentoring Program 295,445 SB&T-Social Services Building 444,580 Recreation Fee Class 1,173,706 Internal Services 4,026,640 County Garage 613,415 Total General Fund $ 176,033,678 Debt Service Fund - County $ 4,476,004 Capital Projects Fund Transfer from General Fund 5,746,935 Total Capital Projects Fund $ 5,746,935 Internal Service Fund - Risk Management $ 991,779 School Funds: Operating $ 135,091,375 Nutrition 4,974,000 Capital 1,153,442 Debt 9,500,487 Bus 760,000 Regional Alternative School 520,437 Laptop Insurance Reserve 549,495 Grant 5,123,147 Textbook 1,307,185 Total School Fund $ 158,979,568 Total All Funds $ 346,227,964 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2007-2008 Budget April 24, 2007 Expenditures: General Government: General Administration Board of Supervisors $ 394,076 County Administrator 292,464 Public Information 248,452 Asst. Co. Administrators 367,144 Human Resources 674,274 County Attorney 510,978 Economic Development 686,494 Total General Administration $ 3,173,882 Constitutional Officers Treasurer $ 787,273 Commonwealth Attorney 851,503 Commissioner of the Revenue 813,516 Clerk of the Circuit Court 979,673 Sheriffs Office 1,633,644 Care & Confinement of Prisoners 5,361,593 Total Constitutional Officers $ 10,427,202 Judicial Administration Circuit Court $ 197,068 General District Court 40,878 Magistrate 1,655 J & DR Court 18,429 Court Service Unit 857,405 Total Judicial Administration $ 1,115,435 Management Services Real Estate Assessments Finance Public Transportation Management and Budget Procurement Services $ 929,291 1,240,426 380,476 260,549 407,860 Total Management Services $ 3,218,602 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2007-2008 Budget April 24, 2007 Public Safety Police $ 11,704,863 Fire and Rescue 10,896,200 Total Public Safety $ 22,601,063 Community Services General Services $ 325,433 Solid Waste 4,788,335 Community Development 5,055,580 Building Maintenance 2,221,379 Total Community Services $ 12,390,727 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 2,100,790 Parks and Recreation 2,519,500 Public Health 527,668 Social Services 7,279,792 Contributions -Human Service, Cultural, Tourism 731,794 Library 2,664,749 VA Cooperative Extension 94,129 Elections 298,990 Total Human Services $ 16,217,412 Non -Departmental Employee Benefits $ 3,808,971 Miscellaneous 3,749,000 Internal Service Charges 1,291,500 Total Non -Departmental $ 8,849,471 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2007-2008 Budget April 24, 2007 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt - General & Schools $ 10,393,396 Transfer to Capital 5,746,935 Transfer to Schools 62,450,497 Transfer to E-911 357,958 Transfer to Schools - Dental Insurance 452,299 Transfer to Internal Services 992,767 Transfer to Comprehensive Services 3,753,000 Transfer to County Garage 139,634 Total Transfers to Other Funds $ 84,286,486 Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency $ 100,000 Total General Government $ 162,380,280 Comprehensive Services $ 6,580,006 E-911 Maintenance $ 477,958 Law Library $ 41,648 Life Skills Mentoring Program $ 295,445 SB&T-Social Services Building $ 444,580 Recreation Fee Class $ 1,173,706 Internal Services Management Information Systems $ 3,358,145 Communications 668,495 County Garage 613,415 Total Internal Services $ 4,640,055 Total General Fund $ 176,033,678 Debt Service Fund - County $ 4,476,004 Capital Projects Fund $ 5,746,935 Internal Services Fund - Risk Management $ 991,779 County of Roanoke Adopted FY 2007-2008 Budget April 24, 2007 School Funds: Operating $ 135,091,375 Nutrition 4,974,000 Capital 1,153,442 Debt 9,500,487 Bus 760,000 Regional Alternative School 520,437 Laptop Insurance Reserve 549,495 Grant 5,123,147 Text Book 1,307,185 Total School Funds $ 158,979,568 Total All Funds $ 346,227,964 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 2007, are re -appropriated to the 2007-08 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 2007, and appropriations in the 2007-08 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 2006-07 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Fund in fiscal year 2007-08 as follows: a.) Two-thirds of the year end balance in the school operating fund will be allocated to the Major School Capital Reserve; b.) One-third of the year-end balance in the school operating fund, not to exceed $1 million will be allocated to the Minor School Capital Reserve; 2 c.) If the one-third allocation to the Minor School Capital Reserve exceeds $1 million, the excess will be added to the Major School Capital Reserve. 6. That all General Fund unexpended appropriations at the end of the 2006-07 fiscal year not lapse but shall be re -appropriated, as provided by Resolution 122104-4, as follows: a) 40 percent of these unexpended appropriations shall be transferred to the un -appropriated Minor County Capital Fund Reserve; b) 60 percent of these unexpended appropriations shall be re - appropriated to the same department for expenditure in fiscal year 2007-08. 7. That all General Fund revenues collected in excess of appropriated revenues shall be re -appropriated, as provided by Resolution 122104-5, as follows: a.) Revenues in excess of budget will first be allocated to the General Fund Un -appropriated Balance, until the maximum amount for the current year is met, as specified in the General Fund Un -appropriated Balance Policy, as adopted by Resolution 122104-2; b.) The remainder of revenues in excess of budget will then be allocated to the Major County Capital Fund Reserve 8. Rescue fees collected by the Fire & Rescue Department in excess of budgeted amounts will be re -appropriated and allocated to the Fire and Rescue Capital Reserve. 3 9. That $2 million from the Unappropriated Fund Balance is hereby appropriated to a Reserve for Contingency for unanticipated or emergency expenditures that may arise during the 2007-08 fiscal year; and money allocated to the Reserve for Contingency must be appropriated by the Board of Supervisors before such money may be expended. 10. This ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2007. 0 OC O O C— O O cq A a� cc a a) 'Em Ch m U O Ch O C co E O c a� m CL w a� F- C) O N � y j � t a CO) 0 C S 0 a , J 0 3 d O O 0 N o F. G1 cL)V H O Q LL n m J E h V R O C LL L O a� a� t a m m L u G F Q C O m U r to h U N m N N f` ti N cm N N 0 C C C 0 0 N N N O o O co to (o II Lo I N m U I Z y m cC CD 18- E E E E. E N w Vd 07 N 0) 0) z Z z Z c m O N U I � i tD T O O O N co N M M � � M t•�1 m r�i M rbi rbi r°i Q Q Q Q Q Q Q R Q Q Q C N N N N N ry Q Q Q Q Q V O O O O O O N N r N N N m N N N Of m m m m > N m m > c E 7 O l] 7 O L> cn in S od 0 t O - p O - m � m N c QAi U O U C 0 0 N O O o O O a> E .c m E m d m U a U r a E E E 15- E E 16. E T a a d d v O O O O O O z z z z z z N N N N " m U N - E d � d m Obp_ U C m m (o i , o �; d i; m m m m m m m m Y 0) a l] N L> cn in m a d N c. o 0) c0 ti OJ m ID m � (D m N N N N N N N N - E m m m Obp_ m m m (o i , cn �; cn i; m m m m m m m m 0) a l] N O m N d N c. N N (D N N N ii E 0 o O O o O O Ln cLo v Lo IT u -j to Lo u> N N N N N N N N - E m m Q r - E C C > > > C 7 E c E N G C C C N - 7 N (On O N V m O 0) a l] N O m m d d c. (D 0) ii E a w � E u 0 C e0 '(j U U o d m o 0 o m E E E E E E E m d m 0 0 ID C C cc C C C O O O O O O O z z z z z z z > > > > N G C C C N - - N (On fOn N y O O N a N N � m Q d d c. (D a. � d 0 0 0 U 001 U U U U C c v a a `o o. n LO co fn fn E E E E a w Lu O O O O U O O N N N N '- U U U U a 2 N o N (o N o N (o (O O V to vo m m m m m m m m O O O O O o o b o v v v v v v a v v m t'i ci m m m m m m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O o b O O O o O O N N N N N N N N N (D (D cD fD (D (D 0) O c0 N N N N N N tV N N N N N N N N N N N r Lo r r m Q d m NC C 01N H r o cr L) w L O O U O O N w m 0 U 7)4Y V U .LOC C .. O O O 0Fa C SY CO m N N rn E E y CL a y x U U U r z 0 m N C oa E' E E E E E E E E v a C C C C C C C C E O O O O O O O O X Z z Z z Z z z Z w of V N 7 N O U c U Z m vU U .y � ` - In N m O O Y LL C 4 w w ° m m > d dv m w a w U m cl y Q1 = fn fn Q O K H H U to ti r O N to m rn o t0 u] lf] tD (a to tp to m L �_ m m m m m m m E N 0) O E ~ O ca � C > o Q1 m L^ V SY U � U m E cm ��- 5 o C� o m LL U LL a s E E E E E C C C C C Z Z z Z Z cnM- Cc CC m N N C rn O o C0 m to (D m m m O) Q Q N N N c N N LU 4-- m y CD a E E 0 0) C C O O z z �e �R t- m rn w o, a, w rn rn w rn a> m rn a+ w w a� rn m w w n n n n n n n n n n n n m rD ICL m m n0i n n n n (D W (D c0�1 0 0 0 0 C09 0 0 0 0 (D v o o v o v a o v o v v o v v o o e c v e o o O 0 O O o C) O O O o O m M n m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n n n n n n n h n n n n M m M (A W (D O1 CA CD CD CD 131 (U CA O (D a CA CA CA D1 CA (A CD M O1 CE < C V V Vi O Q ? V O O O O O O O _ O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N V V O Q 0 (D CC) (D 0 (D CO (D CD 0 0 0 CO CD (D m m CD CD (D (D 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m _m CD CA CD rn T O( CA CA (D CD Dl CD (D ❑1 (L CA CA CD (D Ol O CD CA O CD V V O V O a a a v t a V O a Q 7 v O a v a V O v v v Q (D 0 (D W (D (D 0 CC) (D (D (D cd N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N N r r r r N r ry t7 N r r r r r r N 0 N fD r r �J t7 r t7 r M N t7 d N d d E n C C C C y N > N > > y > F0 w m m F E c m m E 0 C x 'o O y O ob d oi3 a a U G (3 `o o o Q y ='20 a) m y G > d ' O d O i ` y T O00 a) m N (" O m w U d d y m U y d y t d U U m U a`m v f- a w _� d O v (U c cdi c O U `° c c "� '� v '2 o y m Z m d an d o m d d O c y Cf) m 10 m (n y " d z ci y (n Cf) y (n O CD CC m O y U C � C � U C y y j m Ca) N 7 (n C o ¢j.., m y (a la (n N a' R E a E C m d m of d E r c m Z w a_ E y y r E d E Y E c u E d d m d d m. o E m d c E E o m d m y E (a c E E 'v E o m E C c C E Y a m o o U C d 7 m O O O C a d t o d m O O o o O O o C o d m O m o O m d (n S m U 'u. ii C7 x d a U U ii i (n U F 0 0 0 d U (n U O iz U 0 0 (n C) a x D- m m y C m a E n a a a n n a a n n n a a a n n a a n a n a o n a n n n a n a n n a a n a n a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E v E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E m m w m d d m d m m d m m m d m d d m m m m> d m m d d d m m d m m d m d m m x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 0 d 0 d d d d d d 0 d d d d a) 0 d d d d 0 0 E d d d d d d N d d d d d d w W d C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 Z W 2 Z 2 Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z y O N a) CL (n o o c 12 m w m N u h h a c c 'o h — ca 0 N h N N N N .m !O T �0 W _m .(a m o m m .L m .Lt w w w 4) w w w aa) a' U OU o '9 a u C U m E 0 o d C .0 0 0 0 .0 a a Q a a a a E rn as t U U ° 'C C Q E m fa o U D d d d d d (U N Cn (n Cn (n (n 0) — E C O C C a a a a a a — 0 to d <J y L ., O d m O 0 0 (n 0 (n 0 O O O O O O O Y O O d c U U � L (� N O O CM, d U 0 0 0 0 0 m d Q n G 4 0. m (D N 6�1 Y N = U O F O C d m U U 0 0 x a �i a a a a> > > n >> >= U m ycmi (n (n y d m U d d m u m c m m Ll a a a Cl a 0 C7 (n Ci U) (n C7 m �G Q m c~ (n' in in (n u> (n E E E E E E E m m m E m d v w w N '- m m C c m m �i s U E E >. (n (n — W U J— E c m Z > > m o o E O of v v v v v v rn rn `o rn o`o rn a U m a U U E o o m m o 0 3 n E m d a (Ui o O h U 'E (E E !E � EE o O o 0 o O O w d o w o>> d d a� m ami a ° Q o w 7 0 0 0 Q 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 a` a` a` a a` a CL H F U) H U U U m J J a¢¢ 0 w w U x m 0 N N 0 n tin 0 tD - N LL') " M - M M M M n q M O N O O n r r N n O O C') u7 ? m m t� O Om O LL') CC) n n m m (D CD CD CD CD (D CD co (P O V co 0 N N N IC) CD CD (D O r- m V �A m 0 0 CD O CD m 0 (D (D 0 0 0 00 (D 0 CD 0T n N m V CD 0 CD co CD CD 0 n m O O v (n C/) 0 O (D 0 tD 0 CD (D 0 (D fD (D [D CD 0 (D 0 (D 0 0 (D 0 n n n n n n n n n n n n CD [D (O CD Cb u, OW O+ O+ rn O+ Q+ Q 0 0 m(R m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 e v e a v e v v e v e M M M 'm', M M M M M M M M m o, rn C C C O m CI 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 M M co � n v) m a, rn w m o, o, r N n n r n n r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N e — — — — M M — 0 (U E E c N N m ac) E H H mm E Q a7 ca w `o n o y O 4qh� m m O O ° U _U N C O_ d t' 0 d m � D ° U U> U) 'C N W a)Wa m o Z E y a O c d d E u y to E 'En ma m c c E Y D o d o U c d d o m m U W m LU E C7 C7 U a a a a a o. a a a a a a a E E E E E E E E E E E m m d m d m m m m m d x x x x x x x x x x x m m d m m m m m m m m C C CC C C C c c C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z z z z z c ec y N to y 0 Q f/°1 � W o m m `o E N c " = CL E. O v.In m r — m n Q R 0 0 U K m d la C C O ~ U m m m , d C m a) U) '0 U m C) d E co C m O y d O C l0 U U C Q c m°> E a> Z m am m m C y E -J m 0 0 'Ny m Q U N (n m o o w m z a a -TO e N v �> M N m N O N M M r O M v a In w m 0 m m r r r m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M n: n n n n rl�. r r_� n n N N N N N N N N N N N CV e e e v e v v< v v v v 'I m m m rn m rn rn m rn m rn rn �ri 0 ui 0 0 ui ui ori +n uS ui ui m m m m m m m m m m m m M m m m m m m m m m CO m m m m m m CO m m m 04 m m m m m m m m m m O N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C r m m d m m o 0 E o. 0. 0_ n U d dd m N 7 N m m d W d y m U 2 2 L Z 2 2 a) d d d (n U) E E E E Z m E �0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o ac) ° ac, U U U U) U m f d U Cl) U C) n a a oa a s a s oa a _ a E E E E E E E E E E E E d dm m m m m m d m m d x x x x x x x x x x x x m m m m m m m mm m m m c c C G C C c C C C C C o 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o z z z z z z z z z z z z m e M m O r 0 M O O m u N V a m m M M e a N o M M M M M M 1 0 to 1n M n n n n n r n n n n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m co_ m m m m m m ao m m m m m v v v e e v e e v a v e v v< e e v e v v e v v e< e e m m ao m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m in u� u> Ln >n in in in in )n ui in )n in v, )n M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M o O o o O O o O o O o O O o o 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N �- r "1 M 0 h Ir N N N E a '" m c E m o o o E Q o `a w m G fH m fA N j d .L.. m 0 U U U lUtl C m O m m aZi ati � � 3 � aUi in E E=EEH Y L.9 O OO O O O O L O O O m m J J 0 y cn CO ii a a a U) U U U a O 0 0 0 0 0 m is is is is h N N H y C C C C C 0. 0. d 0_ a E E E E E 0 o 0 0 o L) U L) L) L) E E E E E E E E E E E a d m m m d m d m d m d EE E E E axi v a) a> w ax, ax> ax> a> ax> a) m m m m d c C C C C C C C C C C w w w u� w z z z z° z z z z z z° z O N � G o G c m c o N m O o c E , m w CD E kic U U n a`� c cmi d LL ro (U - ani E 0 "o M )° o m C F .Z H =' O O G m U N O 4> C C w U C C ca m E U) m 2 m . o u h a c W U d m U K d O m Z EU U L N C m C N m m o E in R 0 O 0 U M H w 0 m a m �Q mi mi E E E Y y o m O E O N O O O N V O _ Q Q w U) w m ii n_ a C) O � '> (n a U) N O e m M t0 m N m O N m O en �f7 ON ON o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m ao m m (v m m (v en m m m m m m m m m m m m m a, rn rn m rn rn rn V m m m m m M M M M M M M v v c o v v c v v v v v v v v V v v v v v v v It c at m m rn m rn rn � � ti � r; r` � � ai of ai ai ai ai of of o6 0; ai of ai ai ai W of o0 of of a ai ai of � � � � - v n n n n n'W'- n M M M M M M M (v m m m m (-D m v v v v v v v v e v v v v v v c v v v c v v c v r r r r v V v v v a v e v a v a v v e v v c a v c v v c v V c v v- v In In In In In In In M- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m m w o M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M - M M u n In M LO In to m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n n n n n n n N N N N N N N N m C m C C m m m m m m m m m m c v a v v v v v v v v v v v v v a v a v v v v v o 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - - M M M uco in Cn (n o Mn N F E E H c E o OE o c c E a s m o a c L _o a c o o a C O C @ V C f`9 O C c f4 O _ > > U1 U1 O N @ L 7 _ OI N > L -r- > O o N J J m 7 iy N N N m m U V a) W m N m al w @ a) dC d E d al C C N T 0 � @ C O 0 0 Q M 0 G � c O @ -E J 7 O -0 d a) Cn L m 7 @ Ui U) 7 @ @ N 7 x E E m w '� m u m UJ E `° $ .L) v v v a`l a`l a`l m` a`l `m a`l '� c c E 6 E w E C C O O O O O O L r L L L L L N O N al O O C O 0 d U U lL w CL LL a w U) LL R' U ! U) U) d d d d (n U) co U) (n U) U) U U 0 C7 U J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M m is m m is m m m m m m m m @ @ m N m m m N m m m N N m N m N m G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ca al @ a) m a) al a1 d d a) a! al al al a C a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E O L d CL G O- a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q a O d d d d d d d d O- d d O a G O 0 O d O 0 0 d E E E E E E 0 a L) L a E EUS E E E E E E E E E E E E E C) a E 0 L) E v al m a v m m ar a d d m a d d v d w m v d a d a x x x x x x a a a a a a a x x Cl x x x x x x x x x x x a x x a a a x a Cl a x E C c c c C C E E E E E E E c c E c c c c c c c c c c C E c c E E E C E E E c x o 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x o 0 x x x 0 x x x o w z z z z z z w w w w w w w z z w z z z z z z z z z z z w z z w w w z w w w z N @ O al N CL p of a C m (V C C U N M C @ al E a 4 V CLD 0 o E c Q t I- 'D O O U 0 @ C h V t: a '2 Irl, o a0Om > 0 o o o aU ccmaUs o$ (a U) E(n a 0 vU o cmJE m U nUoE 3 n E C O N Co L @ O C F O cm C) a1 aU C O L Y Ep amFca) u E 5 ao n .v a U 3 o o o E . C U 0 w aNm 0 M n E ULLLL E _ C al a U Q @ Cn W a C E C W U O j O 0 (n U) U) (n U) U) U > w @ — C ? Z, -V 0 U m d c m .v o 0 - d a) C O C (tl d O O O U U E 7 7 J 7 7 J 7 7 U N C N E � a w 0 a0i o c' - .o .E m aci o n v 0 o aci o 0 o y m w Cl m m Cl m Cl w x @ o m> o _�' ❑ a@i m 2 U W (L J U [O CC w U) > Q ❑ W U) d (L U J ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W U' V) d ❑ U w F (r (n n m 'R n CO [0 N M n O N O n < IVof 0) M m OW O) < O O N M CD O O m N N Cl M O O '7 O O N M O m W O N N �[] n N V, U) w n n m m M Ol W N M M n O N M In n N N M M V v V n In N N N M M MCOMM ty N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C al M m m_ O m_ m m m m_ ID In m m 1n W LL] M ID (D M m 1n (n m LL] (n (D m m ((l (n m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a7 N 0 N _ lD 1(1 4] LL] ID o i!) IR n lh lD Ip LL] LL] � h � � � 0 LL] 1() In LL7 I[f LL] MLL7 LL) (l') MLL7 I[] LL] IA M LL7 ILY LL] IA ID tp (�] M M M W m mw m m m mm m W m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL] 0 m N m m m (O m U) cc m m U7 m Oct as UJ W m W (O m m m a7 m m n m n m n m n T n m n m n m n m n m n m n O� n m n m n at n m n O� n m n at n ao n O( n m n m PN - M (o m M vi n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n o n n n n N N N N N N N N N N N N O < 7 V O o 7 O ? v e v ? R 7 O ? v O O ? g m m O m O w O m O 'P m V m < m < m 7 M v m 7 m < m 7 cc v m V m 7 m m m m (O m m m a7 m m m (O m (D W cc m m W tc m W W cc m m W (O m m m m m a7 m m m cc m m m m W (D (C (n m m to a) m (° m m 0 a7 0 (D (O a) u) m m W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CO m CO CO W O 1mfJ r •- M - .- r- .- N 7 - N - - - - - M r 1n r r r N cu E 9 W c a m 7 vOi "O m lL a O d m c m C LL c ro c ILL r m L J m 7 H 'o m ° LL N U N O (n N U O U 7 g a3 0 a) W' al a 7 F°- ,3 0 a) W' ro s 7 H -6 0> d W of d C E n 0 a) ❑ E D E E O U o 0 L U H 0 .� E g C d o O d d� O d d L (n N m d o = N E E O U W N ns d H y C ro C LL _ �' 7 m G E c 0 > al ❑ j E E O U z' `� L J y (n m 'O O cn C E a 0 > at ❑ 7 E E O U N U (!J m 'O O w C E a 0 > a1 ❑ 7 E E O U d 7 H 'O m d LL a 7 a) U w LL m �' q a m g p a y O a s d L co r d L v> m L m r m L <n a L N d L (n C E O_ 0 i QI ❑ E C E E O U C E n 0 i a) ❑ c 'E E E O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `a( 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 01 a m N M 41 m N m N co N M N m y co N m N m N co N m y M N Ms N m N N m V) m N m N ro N (o N m N io N C m C a) C G m C a) G a) C al C C a) C N C m C a) C m C a) C a1 C C a1 C N C C a) C a) C C CL E d E O_ C E fl_ E O_ E O_ E Q E d O E Q E O. E Q E Q E d E d E Q E C_ O E Q E Q E d O E O. E d EE O d O . O E a E x a a E z d o U n E O U n E O U c E O U a E O U a E o U n E a E x o o U as E o U a E Q E x d o U c E o U n E o U Z.Q E a E x w o U O. E o U a E o U a E o U a E o U n E o U a E o U Q E a E x a o U a E a E x d Q E x d( a E x O U n E . E x m o U a E a E x a n E x w n E x w OL E x d a E x a a E x a o U c E o U n E c O C O 0)a) X X N X y X w X w X C O 0 X w X C O w X w X w K C O w X w X 0 X w K 0 X 0 X a/ X C O W X C O C O C O W X C O W X C O C O C O C O C O C O x x Z Z W W W W W W Z W W Z W W W Z W W W W W W W Z W Z Z Z W Z W Z Z Z Z Z Z W W O c p ` N N L CD O LL E ro a ~O m j c CO C 'E U a) O Es O o a O ul Z CL 7 Ol L 7 a m a) oL (� O n ro a c ro 1a U m m O m a O U N C 7 m O m a O U w C 7 m N Z = E (o o O M y Y o m C -o N (o a a1 D` O N m acr� v° CM ro c m rn ° d C O d o a( M � O m % (n O '� E o C U n M o a) c9 a) E a3 o a¢ N >,� m Q > (` Lo❑ C .E 'o p Z v Q 7 Z3 "' O y o o a¢ M >, m Q _> m C 'E a a) N ° a� C O N E o U 7 w L U ` 7 b m 7 ❑ a( r c.) y C 'V (co c iL a3 Q a 7 In m a o N 'O O c� aN _O 2 Ui ... .o Q l0 U m w m N Z a 7 ° o co 2 a) O- (n (D N N C a r U o .2 m 4 7 y y .� w c E OT c E w o Z cn ro 0 L (n C a c W U D_ C ro LL c > a) ` iL 6 C N 0 Q E y w Q to .20 p .- o a a7 Ol W _ '� o o a ° g p O U .0 7 E ° U d U❑❑ E y ` c ° ��- m h ro U rn y N (n o d m U d (n — v ro E C m to - (n L n m O m a7 E c co y m (n Z' a m 0 c N a( N tt m (n �' a y 0 o cm "N d > C of y m (n 7� a (D 0 m 2 :O ¢a C m (n N (n T 'o d 0 m m a 7 (n C O .� O. U ro 3 E— w N Qi W U a] CO M (D 7 O m O M M M M n V M 4] Q (n M m 4] CO to 7 N 7 < N m O V v V N M n n CO m m m N W Q n M (D V N n N O O 1n Co 0 n n M n N m M m 0 a M n V Q co N N N N N N N ('> M V V ? N N N N N M Cl) Cl) 7 O V 7 7 O v v O Q V' m N M N M N M N M N ? N R N" ? V N V N R N R N O N R N ? N C N C N w N N 0 N ( N 1n N N N � N N N (D N (O N u'1 N u'f "N IA IA N LO N afy N 4 CNN N � N N N � N W N N N '(00 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D (D m (D m (D (D O O O O O O O UE E ED "o UE LD N (O m m _m m m m tD (D (0 (0 w w o a CD V V � V V O V N - - N - m E E Vl N o o C T ~ ~ E O c O oa o8 0 _ o N C C m L L ` O O N U U O N N C) H H m m N N --E o ry O m u u E E w E E Y Y E o 0 0 2 a d V c O O O O O O O m m m m m is m c c N N N c VI c G1 c 0 01 N m CL CL E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E E E w w w W w LL w N -J 0 10 r u O N N N N m m (m+1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m . M M m M M m M M m m m C) M 11 r) (h I2 c2 c7 N] (h c'1 N1 ( 1 rJ N1 C2 mm m m O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N (0 O O m f0 (D m 0 O N CR O ri M (h r) (h C- (h M 6 (h (h Ci <+i(- Ci M (D fD (D (D W Oi Qi W Qa Oi m m a C> Cb 0r W W (0 (D (D 0 (O 0 (D (D (D (D (D (D m (D (0 (D 0 (D (D (D (D (D (D (0 (D (D 0 (D (D (0 O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O O w 10 0 ([7 N N N N N N N N N N N N O m m cl Om m m m m m m m m mi Qr O O O> m C� W W m O1 cc m O m m m In 1A IA IA (7 r7 C% (") ( r ") (7 (") (7 (") M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N UP 10 0 4> m m m m m m m m m m m m u7 (0 1l1 10 H7 i0 1() U) LO U'> K1 � 0 KY K) 10 N N N 10 N 0 10 10 u7 N LO 4'1 1A UD N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N (D (0 (D (D (0 (0 (D (D (0 (0 (0 (C (C (D C0 (0 C C O O O O O O O C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V V V V 11 N 1` n n r- h n A n N n e e v v e e e e a e v e e a e v e v v V a v a a a e e a v v e e T T T j C y y T T T T y y o 0 o U S E Q Q o 0 0 o Q c 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl C C C ._. - C C C C 2 d> v =W> j `—° m >> v v v v >U U Ix 11 j 0O o ww m COcA o U) L �' n o O O o a V y E y E E m m d d a x y Y E p �p m E E E E E E E A A m0 C O O O N N O O O O O L N O U m C O O O O C O O EO d d m c7 i� C c7 C 00 a a a a w 0 0 0 w m 1i U U c c m LE E C U LL u_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _o _o m A m m R m m f6 f0 m i6 R m lO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N c N c c N N c c c a N C c C c c N N N N c c c c N c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O C O C C C C C C C C C C C C 01 O1 N N N 0r N QL m dN 0r c N c N C N 01 C C n N N N N N N CL n n n n n a n n n n n a n d n d n a aa a n a n n a n E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U E (1 E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U E E E U U U v v v U D v o v v U U U U U U v U U U l a m a Q_ a a x X X a a a a a a a a a a a 4 a aa s a 4 a a a a E E E E E E E d d d E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E NW N W W W w C c C W m N W N N N N m W W W 41 G1 N N m 0 W N 0 N X X X X x aa�� X O O O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LU w w w W W w Z Z 2 w w w w w w w w ill w w w w w 111 w W w w w w W C E Q m c C O m y � � 2 C o E ❑ X U c U W N C0 O C w m o c v 0 V) U w _m O N N 'EO d U O U 4 4 4 N d 7� d m A m m m (6cn N O C O` O N d N W W N 41 m 0 N h CO— m C m L d 5>> 3 5 y I Y O E E U rn O_ m U) d w N N m O C CL in N C n Co m m y m N J J J J J J m a o a1 O _ c c uJ O H M m c o iL U 'iy > (O'a U— E E rn x in y m N O v w m Lu a v v v v v L 5 Eo D m c c Q m m' .E U U o d 0 Y O cr o M 0 0 0 0 O m m m c E m m g m 2 Q Q c c Y_ o Q E U U v w u v a? a❑ o m w D v a$ rn o 0 E d d v v ,cJ ,v n W `m a o o m m y m= OU o v o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L o v a c h? m c m % o iu m U 1L U Z V) U ii ii d d a d d ❑ LL U d w m LL Q U ❑ Q m U� U) m N m m 4 m � O 0 r O O r N M V LO 1- O V m V (0 O u� (D n O ri n rn N V LL7 `4n4 V ¢J O1 .- f7 (") (" m ) r7 (") m M (0 N N O) O ('� V 10 r- f� rn 01 O O N N N N cn v v V v V V V r N O N N N N N N N N N V v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (OV tcn W d EL 0 N C �0 O 0 ` CLC N c a` v1 n L) v U) n O C O N U L U w y U_ J o m 2 Q N C > C m d O m n V w E C 0 c a nn Q L) mI Q O L E-c'S _ H m H E U c (n H N -J 0 10 r u O N N N N m m (m+1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m . M M m M M m M M m m m C) M 11 r) (h I2 c2 c7 N] (h c'1 N1 ( 1 rJ N1 C2 mm m m O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N (0 O O m f0 (D m 0 O N CR O ri M (h r) (h C- (h M 6 (h (h Ci <+i(- Ci M (D fD (D (D W Oi Qi W Qa Oi m m a C> Cb 0r W W (0 (D (D 0 (O 0 (D (D (D (D (D (D m (D (0 (D 0 (D (D (D (D (D (D (0 (D (D 0 (D (D (0 O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O O w 10 0 ([7 N N N N N N N N N N N N O m m cl Om m m m m m m m m mi Qr O O O> m C� W W m O1 cc m O m m m In 1A IA IA (7 r7 C% (") ( r ") (7 (") (7 (") M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N UP 10 0 4> m m m m m m m m m m m m u7 (0 1l1 10 H7 i0 1() U) LO U'> K1 � 0 KY K) 10 N N N 10 N 0 10 10 u7 N LO 4'1 1A UD N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N (D (0 (D (D (0 (0 (D (D (0 (0 (0 (C (C (D C0 (0 C C O O O O O O O C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V V V V 11 N 1` n n r- h n A n N n e e v v e e e e a e v e e a e v e v v V a v a a a e e a v v e e T T T j C y y T T T T y y o 0 o U S E Q Q o 0 0 o Q c 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl C C C ._. - C C C C 2 d> v =W> j `—° m >> v v v v >U U Ix 11 j 0O o ww m COcA o U) L �' n o O O o a V y E y E E m m d d a x y Y E p �p m E E E E E E E A A m0 C O O O N N O O O O O L N O U m C O O O O C O O EO d d m c7 i� C c7 C 00 a a a a w 0 0 0 w m 1i U U c c m LE E C U LL u_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _o _o m A m m R m m f6 f0 m i6 R m lO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N c N c c N N c c c a N C c C c c N N N N c c c c N c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O C O C C C C C C C C C C C C 01 O1 N N N 0r N QL m dN 0r c N c N C N 01 C C n N N N N N N CL n n n n n a n n n n n a n d n d n a aa a n a n n a n E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U E (1 E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U E E E U U U v v v U D v o v v U U U U U U v U U U l a m a Q_ a a x X X a a a a a a a a a a a 4 a aa s a 4 a a a a E E E E E E E d d d E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E NW N W W W w C c C W m N W N N N N m W W W 41 G1 N N m 0 W N 0 N X X X X x aa�� X O O O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LU w w w W W w Z Z 2 w w w w w w w w ill w w w w w 111 w W w w w w W C E Q m c C O m y � � 2 C o E ❑ X U c U W N C0 O C w m o c v 0 V) U w _m O N N 'EO d U O U 4 4 4 N d 7� d m A m m m (6cn N O C O` O N d N W W N 41 m 0 N h CO— m C m L d 5>> 3 5 y I Y O E E U rn O_ m U) d w N N m O C CL in N C n Co m m y m N J J J J J J m a o a1 O _ c c uJ O H M m c o iL U 'iy > (O'a U— E E rn x in y m N O v w m Lu a v v v v v L 5 Eo D m c c Q m m' .E U U o d 0 Y O cr o M 0 0 0 0 O m m m c E m m g m 2 Q Q c c Y_ o Q E U U v w u v a? a❑ o m w D v a$ rn o 0 E d d v v ,cJ ,v n W `m a o o m m y m= OU o v o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L o v a c h? m c m % o iu m U 1L U Z V) U ii ii d d a d d ❑ LL U d w m LL Q U ❑ Q m U� U) m N m m 4 m � O 0 r O O r N M V LO 1- O V m V (0 O u� (D n O ri n rn N V LL7 `4n4 V ¢J O1 .- f7 (") (" m ) r7 (") m M (0 N N O) O ('� V 10 r- f� rn 01 O O N N N N cn v v V v V V V r N O N N N N N N N N N V v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (OV tcn W d EL a m m m m m m m m pll c7 Ln Ln c� n n n o n o h m n mu� n n n O m In m m rl m In n m n m n m n Ln h n m n cD l� m cn W l7 m O C O O Oct O O O O h n n n n n c0 m � Lo vi m m m m m mN a: m m act N N N N N co al O> m to o c m o 0 0 0 o v� m ai m ai al to l� e� Ln al r n � m n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn m o, m W rn rn m N m ry m N m N m N m N m N m ll m m N N OI m w m W m O m W m m m 0 O o O to O C) O to b C, Il to O cn O Ol h c4 N cn N cn N to N N N to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � IO � u7 u7 IL) il] m m v v v Q v O O O v v v v o v n r N n n h h n O v v v 'r n m m m m m m N N N u'I co co to i0 m to Ln Ln to m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n n n n n n n n h h h n m m m O ry N N N N N N N N O c) O O O O N N N N N N N N v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ry c h In n t"l h cel n to h <n n ll n Ir n n n n v m v m v m Q m Q m v m m v n v m v n C m v m a n v n v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m n Wv Wv Wv Wv Wv Wv Ov) Qv It m ] m m m v vW ll In �O m . u;v u) m u') m m IO .O IO IO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r r r r r r — r .- r r N .- r r r r — — — — — E E E m j h j C C C C C G T C T C C C m �� E � E E E m o 0 � o ac C E O E o o f E c o °8 a O O a O a a O O O _M O O E a y _o n O _m O a O Q Q a O s OCa o In G C w C w w w C C C O w m woww= G w y y w w m y G U Ill U Z .2.2> w Z w w ❑ w � N ❑ N N ❑ ❑ w � N C y V w f'- w F 1 W j o > d V o U o U y U . w F aa)i ❑ v m N C L moo aa)i N m > Z w w O '� C C ❑ w 'Z w w w C Z w _O w rr w w O u) w W C C C C O Q W O O U m al '� O .m C G Q C C C a r h y c E ;, E >>> E E E m E@ cn m E ro E E o G m m W rn c'o E @ a'o E w E o E o E c E c E z' 6 W w m Cf cGo w E o f E E o "v o o m` o E m m 'v E w a a o `' n` E E v E E E m m c ii CD 9 a d U U U L) U Ln .9 S u) w=¢ W U ii i.i ii s d ai U U U m' U U U -i Cr ii CD a n w Z cn 2 Z Z i' z Z 2 Z z Z Z Z rn O r r r r o o o 0 o o o o 0 o r r r z r o r r r o r r o `m 0 o ro 0 o r r r r r m a y C m C O m C O m C O m C O m y C m y C m y C m m y y C C m y C m y C m y C m C c m c C m C O m C O m C O m C O m C O y C m C O m C O m C O m y C m C O m C O y C m y C m y C m C O m y C C m y C m C O m C O m G O m C O m C O w n W W W a) w a w n w n w w n a w a w n w n w a W ?+ ?> d w W a d - m d w n al m w a w a w n d w w w n d d - d E �' v) 6 y y E E E E E E E E E a E �' y y y y y E E E �' n E a E E Ll y O V ❑ ❑ 0 0 O U O U O U O O U U O U O U O U O U O U D 0 D�' 0 0 ❑ ❑ O U ❑ ❑ ❑ O U ❑ ❑ O Q O U O U O O U O U O U '^ ❑ '^ ❑ 4 0 0 0 Q. a a n a a a a a a a a a a o_ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a n a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w E 2 U_ w a� y n G m 'm o E U E y U y W W w ` 7 y �' C Q O` 0 7 0) > Wm > w w D w N G O cc W N ❑ U d a w Z E L w L C w O 'm ~ r w N m w m C o W u) y O U O y S� w w a w C m Y w U w a OI m C m C T w T w m O O m E mV w y C C O Q 3 O" O 'N C w V m U m O W c7 L m a w a` C �o 7 w y W c m C o C y E 'm V W 7 2 w O v) O C .� c d o- U E �` c O E > CG. m .Z a) w W o` to c G o w Q _`o Q W '-1 `o `o `o d c a a w E o a En o o E w ❑ d w cn m Ow _ `y O �. �. a O O O _o O Lg O 5 N a O G O L — U U O O o W w m `a w w E= m LL c n w L (j w w ol �, m c o m o o -o w c w L � t w _ w E o a o 0 v) o o E w v w d m m o°� o L c m y u u J LL cc d U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o �_ _ m C U U Q 7 L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ > L U L U L W cn () 7 .y .N y N N C C C C C V _N p m O C C N U - C C C C U G W Q Q ❑ y ❑ ❑ O O O O O O m m m m w w a 3 m m m m m m m W O O O w m ❑ T Q ca _ N 'y M 'y N _N N _N -_ O d C G = p" y -y N "N C "y frll la C a N 'eAN N U) .y N .y C C 'y 'y 'y t U N fA w C O O_ C o_ C Im 7 n C U U U U V m m w Q N Q m Q fn Q m L m d @ O a Q y Q y a 3 m❑ W N a n Q y a y Q m d > o 0 > o t y 0 t 0 O 0 w w m L v❑ w w o o a o 0 0 4') O m m V N n CO m V O CO m O m N m N m Ill O to N O N v m O m n Ol m v m O O O N M N N n N N N O N O N O N O N O N m c7 h Q O r N r N r N O V O V N ? h O m h h c'1 t7 u� tri n m O n m m O O O O O O O O O r r r r r ry N N N N N v V V Q Ill m m LL") m m m m to N M M lel In l7 t7 to M (7 M n to n m CID d m as 0 v v o v rn N 10 cD LD tD �D m O � Q Q m w rp m m m m W @ 0 0 N Q N V Q Q Q V Q W 1n Q Q O m W (A W W LD N m O O m O fp (p O LD m A A m m r r r r O O N r C E c W n E Wm `o -oo m H d > d U U y H U IU/1 ❑ N O U C Z d) E y❑ o ¢ Ln v E z m w m m E m E m u 0 0 a U w 2 = U m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C cc O O O O O O O O O U U U U U U U U U w (n N N W N_ N N N a n a n n n a n a o N w N N d N w W Lit W W W W w Lu w W IDc E E c W n E o n N 0 O _O (U C V LU7 N U j N ❑ > N 7 O N m -C ❑ h Z a E m E o U w 2 o Ln d U C o ii a o 0 0 o C C O O o O O O O m LL UU d N N fU U N U fU U d d L L N L (D 0 co N 0 V Q N N [IJ V V tp fp A A o Q m T O O m CID d m as N m a E7 ~ z N C Z O Q J N d oo d O N d y Qh N a a O N ami E t U o ca 0 N V � o r _`o Q V E 6 w (� LL D'my d ° r Q .J C B ru V m a E ffE n° 'D g ca (U ; V C U 5;; .N y Eo 0 t0a a E w E` H 0 m 0 0 m 0 m 0 U cJ O O F L cn O U U D N 0 Q N V N Q N O � U m N m c Q CL oo Z 0 N L H � t U c LL N t fN LL c F J T U s ION M N Cl) co M N r O N M r r I aD N 1 M � O co C � I N LD M M N (D (O ED 04 � N N 4) (D U U a) U U E E aa) aa) C C Z Z o m O O N N O 0 O M U M 3 O 3 o U a7 m m U_ y m m m m E m U E 0 U U U U U U Lo > m > M N N Gi N 0i z Z r � 6 N O M O N C � O C OtT C 0 C m 0 0 N_ Z a C m m 'n 0 C m al C C) - U U U A > n G O Z M r 10 T M tD O oocoN T m C O Q L_ m a) 3 0 E E U O 0 0 M a� a E x - m c C � O A Z CD I V co co M m O M oM N a) U Z m f/7 7a CSO N 0 m N C a E 0 CLL E x W r m ID co cn o' O M co ►1 cc L c c c i t a t E Q) i m C 0 f Z U o L m co 0 M a W aci a E o U < y 0 z O N N U a cc U N C C w � U — Ol �U QI LL E to a`) 0 L co _T O 7 m a a, a D aci a E O (D U � a) 0 z CNV U � m a ro aa) m o L co _T O � m CL m C O y a E 0 co N U � N Z N a) U 2 U) 0 U 0 m 0 CD OL E 0 E w O In m C S U LL 8 U U 0 U 'J Q N C U �Q � U cn L NOf > 5 y O C L ID N f1 C E w O C U 0 O r d N Q) 0 z N x a� O Z t- O 0 N M m O E cm U N CD C O1 C C a E 0 U � CL m m U O O U m O a a- 0 O F- U) GD > � N 0 z N CN N W) M r 7 V 00 (D coM H a) U Z a) m o U U C LL 0 m N aci a E U cLcL E x w N L m m m s m w V d � � 1 � E m d 'o Z t0 3 c � � N � CL d H zoo tl� d ONO V V CL Q o Q W r C d Z m O �o `° ._ U O i:. m v U N � 3 E a w W -p c O R E � c Z C AN .a Q o aco Z p m a O N >16 O U QtiC9 U p i O [L N O Co LL Q U F- rn E — a E I LLILI Y O c O Q: tO a m i= L m m m s m w V d O � CL` � E_ � m d 'o Z t0 3 da CL d zoo CD ONO as Q o U pj � N � d f LL O m Q C J i0 �o `° ._ U O m U N � a E a w 0 C m O' 6) a N N U ml 'O ,n � N cn C f/1 O C O CL 0 O CL dl d y y CO) m y U m C U � m � m m a a m m m m a d r 2 D a L J Q N v r w O v .- t` m O O (0 O M M Ln M N O N N N M M M O M OD M M U) LO M OM M Ui O M (D M (* I%- (D ti � f1 M CV Ln LnO N 0 m M O 00 a0 � U) r' r O L D 1- O CO M 1— 0 CO CO r- r v -O lI) N �-- r N N CO O f— LO CO M N N O) OD O M CO z0 N 1_ N O N 6 MM —:(M M Ln CY) (0 M aD M O N ct V -V 1� (A � U) U') 1� U') O (D M (0 O (0 O (0 M ti (0 I --OD O "; co 00 OD M O 1- O " O m co N Q r r r r JM 0 M r OD .4-O r t M M M r (10 M r N OD N O M M V 0 M O r M CD 0 O U) N V O m CO r CD M Ln M O O r O MOM N O M (O M CD � OD � (D Co N M N t O O N O O"t M 0�d- 1` (D 11 r M O 0 M 0 M M M 11 O It OO � r O O CO N O) CO M O O 1-- 0 Lf) U) LO CD 1-- M N L() O M OD t r C10 11 (0 1-- O O It (A Lo O Q N M M -t U) (D CO h M M O- N M M I-- M O, M Lo O CD O N C h m r- 4 r N N N N N N N N M M M M I M I M l' -T ,. q I V `cY I U) Lo (D Q f` CO I- OM N r O '' r� Lf) N O 1— M O OD O W CJD I' (0 r V M r O 00 M h N I— 0 O LO M N r 00 N (A M M Or- 0) M� N V r' U) U7 r CO "T CO OD LD(A :51'- O C' qr 1� O -t O v O f` U) V V U) (D O M CO Lr M N N LC) OO V r O r �! O Zr( 7 C Lo (0 OD m O N v In ti O r M to ti O N w CD r v I` O v OD N (O O �7 N N N N N CV N M M M M M M ITI-T 11, Lo U) U) L() (D (D M h 1,- Il- CO CO O (A I JO M m U) (A M Mq 1— M r--ct m CO r 0V ( 't M (D h 0 M 1— 0 M M M N N U() U) cr� CD CD IT M M mT r M N it U) M O LO 1- 0 O r r M O r r 1— `ct 1- M N O N co (D V- (D 1-- r M N M M 't7 M 0 M M O M U) (O h O M M (D h 19T O N r M LO O M CO D 0 O 0 N M�t r M (0 M N O O O O O O N '7 O O 14 M O 1` LO 11 It V O N Q CD r N N M "Cr 14 U) CD ti M OD (A O M Nr U) (D 00 M O N IT LO 1— M M U) O z r r r r r r r r r r r r —I— N N N N N N N N M M cn Mico M V- V- 'Cr U) J r I- I-- t O 1-- OD 0 N CD O U) (D 1- N;t M W r O N O N It N N N N r N 1� O CO M Lr r L() g U) rqj- (D 1-- M M O0 r M t (D M O M N M r 'I OD O "I. OD OD (D r'I CO (D OD 1'- "1- O M C CD M "t 0 r r O r O 0 r 1�- "q: It O O LO N 'T Z h CD 0 0- (V M 1 (0 h CO O- CO U) (0 OD O N Gi I` O r 1 I, O M (0 (n N M O Qr �— r N N I N I N N I N N N MIM M M M M' ' d' LO L() U) (0 CD (D(D l 1� 1-- 00 J d O N O N CD O CD O N N O CD 0 r LO r O M LO 0 CD N;T M 0 LO r CO I— N M O U) M N O IT~ O~ ti CO N O LO O N CO Q) f` It M M (D M M h I� N It O M O M M It N ItO) co U) M 1,- OO r It 00 O CO LO r N 1� OD I— U) O Cl) (D O M O r r- L() N Lf) O U) N LO O (O MN h M CD r d' LO OD O N O W M CD O N W (D (D O LC) O M a) O ai O O N C) M It Lc) (D (D Ih Oo ai O N M It CD ti OD O M U) W c0 Z OO ao r N N N N N N N N M M M M M M CD Q O O r N M� L() O 1` CD (P O r N M 'Ci LO CD 1- OD M CD r N M V LO M 1— OD M O r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M qt ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance authorizing and approving execution of lease agreements with Roanoke County Department of Social Services for office space in the Salem Bank & Trust Building at 200 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, owned by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge tm County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Department of Social Services (DSS) is currently utilizing three suites of offices on the second floor of the Salem Bank and Trust Building. Existing leases for Suites 207 and 211 need to be revised to provide reimbursement for utility costs. No lease currently exists for Suite 218 which was previously occupied by a commercial tenant. A separate lease has been created for Suite 218 to cover the period in the current fiscal year from July 1, 2006, until March 31, 2007, to permit capture of the rental due until the commencement of the new leases which are all effective April 1, 2007. This will permit the terms of two leases to coincide with the term of the existing DSS lease in this building which entered into the first of two five (5) year optional lease extensions as of April 1, 2007. The negotiated rentals for these offices are calculated on the basis of twelve dollars and forty cents ($12.40) per square foot which is the current rate for DSS offices on the upper three floors at Salem Bank and Trust. Suite 207, which contains approximately three hundred eighty (380) square feet, is utilized by the Comprehensive Services Act (CSA) offices of DSS and requires a separate lease due to the nature of funding reimbursement for CSA expenditures. Suites 211 and 218, which total approximately two thousand one hundred twenty-five (2,125) square feet, are now combined into one lease. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County will receive an initial annual rental of $31,074.40. The rental proceeds will be placed in the Salem Bank and Trust revenue account. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the referenced leases with Roanoke County Department of Social Services, for Suites 207, 211 and 218, as currently occupied at Salem Bank and Trust at the negotiated rentals, to be executed by the County Administrator or his designee on lease forms to be approved by the County Attorney's Office. 2) Disapprove the negotiated leases. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Alternative # 1. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING EXECUTION OF LEASE AGREEMENTS WITH ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES FOR OFFICE SPACE IN THE SALEM BANK & TRUST BUILDING AT 220 EAST MAIN STREET, SALEM, VIRGINIA, OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of several parcels of land, containing .68 acre, located at 220 East Main Street in the City of Salem, Virginia, and designated on the Salem Land Records as Tax Map #106- 13-6, #106-13-2, and #106-13-1, and commonly referred to as the Salem Bank and Trust Building; and WHEREAS, said property was purchased on May 15, 2001, subject to leases with the County of Roanoke to provide office space for the Department of Social Services (DSS) and Blue Ridge Behavioral Health Care (BRBH) on the third, fourth, and fifth floors of the building, and subject to a number of commercial leases for the first and second floors of the building and the rooftop for antenna space; and WHEREAS, the County leased the property to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the issuance of bonds to finance the purchase, and the property was leased back to the County for operation of the premises and generation of the revenue, through the existing leases, for payment of the debt service on the bonds; and WHEREAS, Suite 207 of approximately 380 square feet in the Salem Bank and Trust Building, formerly occupied by BRBH, is currently occupied by DSS staff, with assigned responsibilities under the Virginia Comprehensive Services Act (CSA), which requires separate accounting and reimbursement treatment from other DSS responsibilities; and WHEREAS, Suite 218, of approximately 1,575 square feet, formerly occupied by a private business tenant, has not had a formal lease agreement covering its occupation by DSS during the current 2006-2007 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Suites 211 and 218, are now occupied by DSS personnel and these combined premises of approximately 2,125 square feet require a current lease agreement which will include reimbursement payments for utility services; and WHEREAS, by agreement among DSS, General Services, and Finance; the rental for these premises shall be the same rate per square foot as for the space occupied by DSS on floors three, four, and five of the Salem Bank and Trust building and the lease term shall be coincident with the currently existing lease term of DSS in this building; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007; and the second reading was held on May 8, 2007. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That lease of approximately 380 square feet of office space in Suite 207, as shown on attached Exhibit "A", at the Salem Bank and Trust Building, located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, to Roanoke County Department of Social Services for 2 use by the Comprehensive Services Act (CSA) offices for an initial lease term of five (5) years from July 1, 2007, until June 31, 2012, at an initial rental of $4,724.40, payable monthly in the amount of $393.70, for office space, with an option to renew for one additional five (5) year term with an annual rental increase of 3.5 percent, is hereby authorized and approved. 2. That lease of approximately 2,125 square feet of office space in Suites 211 and 218, as shown on attached Exhibit "A", at the Salem Bank and Trust Building, located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, to Roanoke County Department of Social Services for an initial lease period from July 1, 2007, until June 31, 2012, at an initial rental of $ 26,350.00, payable monthly in the amount of $ 2,195.83, for office space, with an option to renew for one additional five (5) year term with an annual rental increase of 3.5 percent, is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That lease of approximately 1575 square feet of office space in Suite 218, as shown on attached Exhibit "A", at the Salem Bank and Trust Building, located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, to Roanoke County Department of Social Services for an initial lease period from July 1, 2006, until March 31, 2007, at a rental of $ 19,530.00, payable monthly in the amount of $ 1,627.50, for office space is hereby authorized and approved. 4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form and subject to the conditions approved by the County Attorney. K3 5. That the funds generated by this lease shall be placed in the Salem Bank and Trust Building revenue account. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. n - - --- G-- 0 m m as o; zm o> U W W a 0 N z� a z ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G .,3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance authorizing and approving execution of lease agreements with Lender's Leasing Corp., a Virginia Corporation, for office space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building at 200 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, owned by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services Elmer C. Hodge SCH County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Lender's Leasing Corp., a Virginia corporation, has occupied space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building since approximately 1988, and is currently on a month-to-month lease as no written lease is available. This tenant is currently paying $487.50 per month for approximately 512 square feet in Suite 205 and the use of two parking spaces, but the tenant is not paying for utilities. After several months of negotiations, the County has obtained a signed lease agreement for two (2) years from July 1, 2006, with an option for renewal for another two (2) years. The negotiated lease provides for reimbursement to the County for utility costs based upon the tenant's proportionate share of the second floor area of this building. After extensive negotiation, the County agreed to continue the tenant's current lease payments for the balance of the current fiscal year, with base rent to increase to $507.00 per month for the 2007-2008 lease year. Rental payments in each year of a lease extension will be increase at the same rate. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County will receive an initial annual rental of $5,850. The rental proceeds will be placed in the Salem Bank and Trust revenue account. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the referenced lease with Lender's Leasing Corp. for Suite 205 and two parking spaces, as now currently occupied at Salem Bank and Trust at the negotiated rentals, to be executed by the County Administrator or his designee on lease forms to be approved by the County Attorney's Office. 2) Disapprove the negotiated leases. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Alternative # 1. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH LENDER'S LEASING CORP., FOR OFFICE SPACE IN THE SALEM BANK & TRUST BUILDING AT 220 EAST MAIN STREET, SALEM, VIRGINIA, OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of several parcels of land, containing .68 acre, located at 220 East Main Street in the City of Salem, Virginia, and designated on the Salem Land Records as Tax Map #106- 13-6, #106-13-2, and #106-13-1, and commonly referred to as the Salem Bank and Trust Building; and WHEREAS, said property was purchased on May 15, 2001, subject to leases with the County of Roanoke to provide office space for the Department of Social Services (DSS) and Blue Ridge Behavioral Health Care on the third, fourth, and fifth floors of the building, and subject to a number of commercial leases for the first and second floors of the building and the rooftop for antenna space; and WHEREAS, the County leased the property to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the issuance of bonds to finance the purchase, and the property was leased back to the County for operation of the premises and generation of the revenue, through the existing leases, for payment of the debt service on the bonds; and WHEREAS, Suite 205 of approximately 512 square feet in the Salem Bank and Trust Building, is currently occupied by Lenders Leasing Corp., a Virginia corporation, on a month-to-month basis since 1988; and WHEREAS, Lender's Leasing also has the use of two (2) parking spaces but does not pay for utilities; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007; and the second reading was held on May 8, 2007. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That lease of approximately 512 square feet of office space in Suite 205, as shown on attached Exhibit "A", at the Salem Bank and Trust Building, located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, to Lender's Leasing Corp., a Virginia corporation, for use by this corporation for its offices for an initial lease term of two (2) years from July 1, 2006, until June 30, 208, at an initial rental of $5,850.00, payable monthly in the amount of $487.50, for the first year, and at an annual rate of $6,085.00, payable monthly in the amount of $507.00, for the second year for office space, with an option to renew for one additional two (2) year term with an annual rental increase of 4 percent, is hereby authorized and approved. The lease also provides for reimbursement to the County for the tenant's proportionate share of the utility costs. 2. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement on behalf of the Board of Supervisors K of Roanoke County and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form and subject to the conditions approved by the County Attorney. 3. That the funds generated by this lease shall be placed in the Salem Bank and Trust Building revenue account. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. 3 (D- _ (D— - oa z g IL ix Ei E H 00 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. (T -q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to Virginia Air Distributors and the creation of a new drainage easement through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Walrond Park (Tax Map No. 27.10-02-19) Hollins Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Pete Haislip Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge /;c" County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Air Distributors (a wholesale distributors/warehouse) is requesting that the Board of Supervisors convey a sanitary sewer easement across Walrond Park, Hollins Magisterial District, as follows: As shown on engineering plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC, the design engineering firm for Virginia Air Distributors, the new 20' wide public sanitary sewer easement would contain approximately 7,900 square feet to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and the creation of a new five- foot wide stormwater drainage easement would contain approximately 1,800 square feet to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park on property owned by Roanoke County and designated as Tax Map Number 027.10-02-19.00-0000. Staff has met on site with representatives from Lumsden Associates, PC and has approved the easement locations as identified on the attached plat. Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make necessary stormwater drainage improvements within Walrond Park associated with the directing of stormwater runoff from the Virginia Air Distributors site into an existing inadequately configured stormwater drainage ditch located in Walrond Park. Stormwater drainage improvements in Walrond Park will consist of approximately 233 linear feet of VDOT standard PG -2A, Type C1 concrete paved ditch, a VDOT standard DI - 12A drop inlet with Type II grate sitting on a monolithic box, 30 linear feet of VDOT standard EC -1, Class -I riprap transition to a Type "D" ditch and 30 linear feet of transition from a Type "D" ditch to a natural drainage channel that exists in the park. An existing park fence and several existing trees will be relocated during installation of the stormwater improvements and the required relocation of these park structures will be coordinated with the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism. In the typical development project, the developer would donate drainage easements and improvements to Roanoke County. Since these drainage improvements will be made on County property, the County cannot donate to itself an easement across its own property. However, the Virginia Department of Transportation requires the creation of an easement since these drainage improvements will also benefit State Route 1823. By this action, the Board will create a drainage easement to satisfy this requirement. Staff, utilizing the Roanoke County standard formula of 40 percent of assessed value of the easement requested (1,800 sq. ft.) has determined the fair market value of the sanitary sewer easement to be $4,000.00. However, staff recommends that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements described above that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park. FISCAL IMPACT: The fair market value of the sanitary sewer easement is $4,000.00. However, the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism recommends that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park. These stormwater drainage improvements will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to Virginia Air Distributors and the creation of stormwater drainage easement for the purpose of providing a sanitary sewer connection and a stormwater drainage outfall on property owned by the County at Walrond Park and that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. 2 2. Decline to authorize the requested conveyance and creation of the easements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1: authorize the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to Virginia Air Distributors and the creation of stormwater drainage easement for the purpose of providing a sanitary sewer connection and a stormwater drainage outfall on property owned by the County at Walrond Park and that the fees associated with the requested easements be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA AIR DISTRIBUTORS AND THE CREATION OF A NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT THROUGH PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AT WALROND PARK (TAX MAP NO. 27.10-02-19) HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a parcel of land containing 37.86 acres off Walrond Drive in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 027.10-02-19.00-0000; and WHEREAS, Virginia Air Distributors has requested the conveyance of new public sanitary sewer easement to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and that a stormwater drainage easement to be created along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including easements, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007; and the second reading was held on May 8, 2007. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows - 1 . ollows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Virginia Air Distributors for a new public sanitary sewer easement to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and that a new stormwater drainage easement be created along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park. 2. That conveyance to Virginia Air Distributors of a sanitary sewer easement as shown and described as "Plat showing New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement to be granted to the Western Virginia Water Authority thru the property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Walrond Park) Tax #027.19-02-19.00-0000 situated at the end of Walrond Drive..." prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated January 31, 2007, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That a new stormwater drainage easement as shown and described as "Plat showing New Drainage Easements to be created through the property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Walrond Park) Tax #027.19-02-19.00-0000 situated along Walrond Park Road ..." prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated January 31, 2007, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby authorized and approved. 4. That the County accepts as payment for the sanitary sewer easement the specified stormwater drainage improvements as shown on engineering plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC and as agreed to by Virginia Air Distributors to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. 5. That the County Administrator, or any assistant county administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be M necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Q r2 s X W I rte- i. Pon .'V'98t 1 i.. Z6 Pi 3 SS,SZ.S6 ry �W I �149� Qa �ck:Cd a� W N oOo � c lV U7 J � T 4n Q w � o O LCI q4 x Y a� W c 5t 9d vis\ C9� 9dl9dd%� s6��M a rp�: M pg k� 64]vtic �y '0-4PI lV U7 J 4n Q c 5t 9d vis\ C9� 9dl9dd%� s6��M a rp�: M 1 72 L X w unoAq-Z0$QL9Z90 �— oi o — — _ N LoN - 3 ,SS,S�Sy N LD I W I V. CL '- � g £SWI II 3 NC6 C'3 �U I Ch 4 O � �CL oCN CZ) �z 4c IJ I r 62 �� I r� 121 �co z��� I_ � ooWi.; o� QUI \1E 6, mW vi INW o ^Y�Q Q6 I g �„ I •o- c �., 0 3 od O I I Qz `" IW z•zo 3 Q ill Iy�' ui �a8 uh a O o v w W y m c 3-S5�14S6 !y M .SSSSf S o' o w goer# gsnou8 k - X Dag TA ole z a 1 Q I W O O< WR Q IA o m "' ^ r, 'na -e z m CL o �w m �� ov�oo w m U p o� 341 rl 1 <>< ,? Z j 6 w. Q ° O 1 Q ��4u7+ co I O A 5 z k� �r co �mQ 13 00 1 E-4 or o Y�?- Zo U o W li O ��.. rw�lz .�q 04 1 v0 wQWti�Q�o - r�� J:��� Q�7 ►`7�+p cv -, �Ilk 1� v=i�vELS zo3� V Q+� o r Iw Q �Z41 O CSV X spa- CDy co x p W z � � �� �•; `°� .:sem cmp'ZOSOL 9290\ins \L9Z90\900Z\soul.ujp\:m ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 7 I - � AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: April 24, 2007 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Diane S. Childers, CMC Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge ('lf County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission The three-year term of Richard Kelly expired on April 8, 2007. Mr. Kelly has advised that he does not wish to be reappointed to serve another three-year term. 2. Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) John Williamson, at -large member, resigned from the Board effective November 16, 2006. This four-year term will expire on June 30, 2008. At -large members are selected by the majority vote of the other six members of the Board and confirmed by Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 10, 2007, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes —April 16, 2007 2. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate $500 from the Virginia Fire Chief's Association, Inc. for the 2007 Health & Safety Award 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. j AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate $500 from the Virginia Fire Chief's Association, Inc. for the 2007 Health & Safety Award. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr. Fire and Rescue Chief Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. cl_ - ' County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Fire Chief's Association, Inc. has awarded the Fire and Rescue Department a one- time $500 Health and Safety Award for 2007 intended to coverfuture expenses associated with continuing the health and safety program implemented in 2004 and expanded in 2006. These funds will be utilized by the department for costs related to the evaluation, physical planning, and progress monitoring of our uniform personnel. Annual fitness assessments were instituted to promote self-awareness and have been completed for the last three years with each employee receiving an easy -to -read report that shows their results for the year. The charts are compelling and graphically illustrate the performance of the employee with the result that employees now look forward to their annual fitness assessment. Based on random surveys of field personnel, the overall wellness program is a tremendous success. FISCAL IMPACT: The department will utilize these funds to offset costs for materials and supplies to continue this worthwhile endeavor. ALTERNATIVES: The department will have to bear the entire cost of this program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the funds in the amount of $500 into the Fire and Rescue Department's budget. GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Prior report balance $13,281,742 Addition from 2005-06 Operations 1,506,678 Audited balance at June 30, 2006 14,788,420 July 1, 2006 Payment on Loan from Explore Park 20,000 Balance at April 24, 2007 q- % of General Amount 8.08% 14,808,420 9.01% Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for 2006-07 at a range of 8%-9% of General Fund Revenues 2006 - 2007 General Fund Revenue $164,315,790 8% of General Fund Revenues $13,145,263 9% of General Fund Revenues $14,788,420 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at a range of 8%-9% of General Fund revenus and will be increased over time to the following ranges: Submitted By Approved By 2007-2008 8.5%-9.5% 2008-2009 9.0%-10.0% 2009-2010 9.5%-10.5% 2010-2011 10.0%-11.0% Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Amount Audited Balance at June 30, 2006 $5,834,217.61 Remaining funds from completed projects at June 30, 2006 631,412.94 Transfer from Department Savings 2005-2006 453,189.00 12/5/2006 Renovations to Roanoke County Courthouse (184,775.00) 1/23/2007 Back Creek Station Addition (50,000.00) 3/13/2007 Renovations to existing Roanoke County -City of Salem Jail (450,000.00) Balance at April 24, 2007 $6,234,044.55 $5,000,000 of this reserve is being used to upgrade Public Safety Radio System Major County Capital Reserve (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Audited Balance at June 30, 2006 2006-07 Capital Improvements Program -New County Garage Appropriation from 2005-2006 Operations Balance at April 24, 2007 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $679,628.00 (500,000.00) 869,992.00 $1,049,620.00 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,► Amount Audited Balance at June 30, 2006 $ 23,297.00 From 2006-2007 Original Budget 100,000.00 July 11, 2006 Appropriation to hire County Gypsy Moth Program, Inc. ($10,000.00) to serve as the Gypsy Moth Coordinator July 11, 2006 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison ($18,000.00) Balance at April 24, 2007 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $ 95,297.00 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. tj , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: April 24, 2007 Accounts Paid—March 2007 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Eimer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Payments to Vendors $ - Payroll 03/09/07 927,551.69 Payroll 03/23/07 963, 378.77 Manual Checks - Voids - Grand Total Checks 107,175.81 114,299.10 1,564.78 Total $ 4,550,495.39 1,034,727.50 1,077,677.87 1,564.78 $ 6,664,465.54 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. H d a 0 C 7 C V V e 7 c e R � K t- 00 ? N N e7 V �c �c a O O- ON 00 t- W) a a? O C a -7 M"t 00 00 v O a a O [� r O '7 O h N t- V) V') a N O t- M �o V) a t- V^ cV 00 O O t` t` O C O V^ O t- t- t- t-- oc 10 t` W) t` W u 00 N 'C Oc z V) e''+ a N t- M O 00 10 00 M t-- V) t- N 00 �O 00 O) Vl V �I�c O O M O O N n N M )D — O t- N 00 kn O O 00 M — V1 O O0 V) O r- — ID N ND O M V) 00 M N a M M t- -. v1 O N )O 7 t- 00 N h 00 v) a CN O tr) W) W) h 00 N o0 �O M O0 00 C1 7 a v) O^ N 14� O O O N .-. N 7 N O a V tl- N M— 00 ol lj�00 h t� O1 v) a kr, rq O N v) M M M •--� •-• •-• 00 t- a N — a 7 oo 00 M O N N 7 t` N 7 a a el a [� �1J t" M O— 7 O t� M h M 00 a N u') M W) v) O W N— u; .-. v) .-. [ _ C-;, M V eV O1 7 N 00 — a Oc N— e''+ N V') O o0 t- N [- O [- 7 a D\ M rn M N N O M M O — V') O M �I�c O O N a O t� 7 N 0 0 0 C, t- �D v) a V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M 7 V 00 O C M a 7 — O N N — M ON T — �c �c -,I- �,O O W) -zr r- 00 ^ 7 O N M 00 M M N � N N tl- v) � N — M 00 �c i 7 00 O V) 00 O C1 a n 00 O a0 a M V) v) u< 00 V) M t� O a V tl- N M— 00 ol 7 Vi a r — 7 kr, OO D — o0 V•e •-• 00 00 a O — O 7 a a �6 a 16 00 7 O 'o a M �D — '� O �O 00 IC �z � a �O M VO — V) O M b '� 00 t- 7 O O N M N a a 00 M M V) N V v) v) a 'V — O t� 00 M O ^ 00 kr ? N M — D1 M O — — — N n� M "D — — r- O N N N V) O O t- a N 00 O O O D\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M M 7 00 O M �I�c O O N 7 N 0 0 0 C, M— 111' N t- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O V 7 = Cl) O O O N a 10 00 t- ON X 0 7 V) a CN C1 7 'IT 00 O O 1.0 O r- a v N t- lD 00 00 N— 7 7^ r- i 7 O o N os o0 ON O O ll f?� 7 M 00 r �O M O a[� O ON .-. ...IJD 00 M 00 M OM M 7 00 N OO N OO O0 M M V) ON O oo ? "D — — t` o0 00 — ID h a M O0 t` O — 00 N 4 00 O a V) O O M M 7 00 O M M V) 7 I7 a 1 M— 111' N t- O �--� _ a 0 OO O O O 01 M O )n 00 N a—_ O N a 10 00 t- ON X 0 7 V) a T g O M M r- O O t! a a N O M t- 7 t- lD N— 7 7^ r- N — O M 7 O o N M r N o0 M �D oO O O ll f?� 7 M 00 r �O M O a[� O 00 a O 00 C1 00 M M M OM M 7 00 N OO N OO O0 M "i N a 00 O oo ? M O ^ O 00 ? N M — D1 -zr k) N M O — — — N n� M O t` O t` o0 'IT V) N a 0 �o O O O v) O r- N 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 O r O 00 - O V) O O O 1 O O O t'- o M �--� O O O a 0 0 C, 01 t- o O N a O O a 'IT t- 1.0 v) v) N 7 00 00 r"1 rn o0 — V) O O O O) t` 00 z t) o0 7 M N 7 N 'o a te— t- N t-- z t` a 0 0 0 O o o0 a a C kl a O Vlc NI V) — OO f?� � � M 00 — V) O" N C1 NC, Nr- CA M oc M M OM M N O — r oe 00 �c Xc a — M �O M O o0 ? M O 7 7 oO a M O N v) O0 — 7, M O — — — N n� M S L h .0 .0 Q o � 7:) Ln u m •cr = j .� " p •^ CO. .� t v> m U v cJ `r �'"" -, • O U d Q W L U Rr �-. -j R O U �' j = U m .O E2 v v v �', C/] d co v v — � c o 3 v o c .� •_ � o• � u o� u �� C7 W c __ U O c c ] s U d � C'. W C7 c c ? Ic U a v or, - N M N _ N M 7 - N M ^V - M V) 1. _0 t'- � 00 O O O C:) C O "" �. C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 N NM M M M 7 '� '7 -t � V7 Vl )n Vl ul ul ul O O O O O O O .� �. — 0 6 0 O C O C O C O O O -It O 10 00 00 N O 'D M N m 00 O O O O O 00 C\ M r- "It 00 O O -- O r 0 ID O O O O 00 N O r t+'1 N N \O r N �D C• O 7 O ti �D r kn v^ V1 M r C1 N 7 r V1 vl r V) 1f, r 0� kr)O v r C, u O O� � v1 O O O O M C1 00 r v 7 '- 7 O O O O a0 O O llO r -- O 7 7 r 01 N O -+ V'1 V'7 N o0 O N O O r 0 r r 0 00 O\ O O 00 O 00 O 7 "T O 00 7 O O C, N � r 00 ON -- V1 V1 N v r N 7 k1l n O O N 7 N rn r 7 .-- C� N 4 4 N Vl r 00 � 00 Z C1 O -r, V100 O r V7 O kn N In v'7 r N � W N \O V7 d - � u m M C1 M O G � r C u m M 00 N ^ -It O 10 00 00 N O 'D M N m 00 O O O O O 00 C\ M r- "It 00 O O -- O r 0 ID O O O O 00 N O r t+'1 N N \O r N �D C• O 7 O ti �D r kn v^ V1 M r C1 N 7 r V1 vl r V) 1f, r 0� kr)O v r C, u O O� � v1 O O O O M C1 00 r 7 C� O 7 '- 7 O O O O a0 O O llO r -- O 7 7 r 01 N O -+ V'1 V'7 N o0 O N O O r 0 r r 0 00 O\ O O 00 O 00 O 7 "T O 00 7 O O C, N � r 00 ON -- V1 V1 N r <+i O N 7 k1l n O O N 7 N rn r 7 .-- C� N 4 4 N Vl r 00 N 00 Z C1 O -r, V100 g00 r V7 O kn N In v'7 r N � W N \O V7 d - � Vl -- r O V1 01 00 01 M C1 M O r C� N opo r C 7 7 7 t M 00 N ^ ^ N M M 7 00 M 00 kn v M kr) C� O� O O V'1 O O O O r C1 00 r O 7 C� O 7 — 00 I -D O O O O O O a0 O O llO r -- O 7 V C1 00 O O— V1 O r V7 0 0 0 0 0 0 t -� 00 00 r O\ "It r - 00 O � Q, r O O N N O te" 00 O Vl r O r ON 7 00 O M r 00 N C r V r O 00 C1 M N 7 .-- C� oe O M N d d r 00 fV V1 V1 V1 00 7 -: N r N on N t O O N O^ M - N C7, ON r C� N opo r C 7 7 7 t N 00 N ^ ^ N M N ^ 7 00 7 O N O O N -7 N rn 0 OIN M C, N 0 0 0 0 7 O m 00 O N O O O M V1 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O a0 O O 71 -- O 7 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Ot- o ell t -� ^ \O 00 C, M m O V' 00 O 00 -It — 00 N N �_ Vl r O r kK kK 00 00 00 k \JD V'1 Zvi �O N 00 .-- N 7 .-- C� z \p -: 00 O �D M N O O N -7 N rn 0 OIN M C, N 0 0 0 0 7 O m 00 00 \D O N M V1 00 O u" -- V1 N r O r 00 0 7 vi 10 vi o r; — — 0 0 0 0 o m C, t -� ^ \O 00 C, M m O V' 00 O 00 -It — 00 N N �_ Vl r O r O 00 00 00 +/% \JD V'1 Zvi �O N 00 .- O M 7 .-- C� z \p -: 00 O �D M Q� 7 O N r O on N t N N 7 O� �O •--• 00 - N 7 V 7 N ID M O r 0 r O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O m M M 00 \D O 7 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 00 r o0 7 .- In -- vi O 7 O m O O [-- O `7 `G Q` t -� 00 O ••7 N C, N -- t+'1 O �D O O C1 N_ O O r 00 vl en � � Un n N N O N O O r14 'It � \D M O u, r M C, C1 N 00 O .--: V, kn O O Vl 00 m 00 N N 00 N C, O C., C, ' O r O M O O Q`. 00 � O N M O, N -.O '� O� �O •--• 00 •7 - �D - r N -y m N N r ^ 7 7 N 00 Vi C mCL N r 00 00 etl LQ L 7 U � n a v O C -b p C C c L G Lc CL rz 0 L u Lam% Vi C mCL T 5 /71 CL cz o. U c 0. U W U c W (� F L' U ^ N M N C'1 In N M Li r 00 — N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �D �D �D r r r r 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 C, u O O O O O O O O O etl _ n O O a V1 O O, a 00 r a Mw O N� a O\ V' V', M m .y O a r `O � Q^ O N o, 0� C 00 U O Q\ O 00 N V r M N N A d o o � C •� 0� CL Lr N U C%tpO O >, O .V .V " _ cy 0°L [-• C' V ...� �-' U cC U C 0. O �_ h C C w ^C C (, ° O O N u �! n U C � cn cn C,w ca w .� V U 14 y L � o C V E2 � J , e z .0 MW I Q � � O L O u � t C c > O u g % O, -'r^ 00 'D 'o gy m^ V' O � O r" .o V r 0 DD V' N a a a 0 V1 m m 00 D o r V) 0 0 V, o^ N N a r v o a a M^ 00 0 00 0 0� o r 0o M V) o a Cl oc 't o 0 U; fV W) o cV h o h Vi o0 o M o o r-, v a D D r \�o o v o r r r .o 00 0 0 00 1.0 N r N r r r a— m N r r v oc o 00 ^ D h 00 O r, a m r D .v z> - t -, N ,� v-, O � Cp V, N -,t r p -O u> r 00-; O a V1 O O, a 00 r a Mw O N� a O\ V' V', M m .y O a r `O � Q^ N o, C 00 U O Q\ O 00 N V r M N N N r a V', "D N N M ^r M -,t -,t a r^ a N O D 00 M O a M oo M'g O V - I'D 00 , O V') ,D o, r r 00 v', V', Q\ O C^ N 00 OW', M O V V O O Q\ ^-� M O v', N h h N O O r 00 v1 00 00 t- v', r 00 0 �D o0 r a lD N O r oo M O m -- r o C7, O h r e 00 V', N m r .-- O M V^ 00 M N^ 00 a M N a �O NV 7 Vi ,-- N •-• m N M -- M N M ^ N ^'V a r N h't 00 00 M V> N c r t 00 \D r V O M m V1 r r N N 00 r 00 �D M r m 0 Q m s 00 N N 00 t- Q 00 Q` f M O r r O a r m I'D N r 7 N M h a V-, 7 O a �D oo N N r a N't oo — O o0 `? O N N m a V r N N V' �D a V V' N �D 7 Dv t 00 M N 7 �O DD 00 --� --� ^ C 00 DO V, M--�O V7 M r V', O O O O o N C C 0 C 0 0 0 0 C, 0^ O r 0 0 00 00 N M O 00 O O M 07 r a a 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0^ 0 0 0 0 00 O O IO O v', M V', Q\ O O M 00 V V M O N V 0 0 0 Vl O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O N V, V'! r v O O c, O v'i O O O O V', r O r'i r -� -� V N N Q: 700 Qi 07 O ^ O O a M �c N O "D �D V1 In -� a O N a a h a O N O^ 00 00 N^ 00 V, O c h' N 00 V', In \D Cl N N �D �D M_ ID M ^ V, r,4 [ O M O N r N 00 r h M M In M ^ r N N V1 V' r 00 T O^ N 7 r 00 O� O^ N 00 O o O � r M 0 V O N ^ N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M m m '7 '7 7 7 h h V) Vr J' `,7' <1 r 00 00 1 a C O O O O O C C O C C = C O O O 2 O O C O 0 0 0 0 C O 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 O C •� 0� CL Lr N U C%tpO O >, O .V .V " _ cy 0°L [-• C' V ...� �-' U cC U C 0. O �_ h C C w ^C C (, ° O O ,0... i p (, p N Vi �! n U � cn cn C,w ca w .� V U 14 m a� i o C V E2 � J , .0 a) tw a>> yv v v 7 x o r v z n 3 O 3 O O V1 V' r 00 T O^ N 7 r 00 O� O^ N 00 O o O � r M 0 V O N ^ N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M m m '7 '7 7 7 h h V) Vr J' `,7' <1 r 00 00 1 a C O O O O O C C O C C = C O O O 2 O O C O 0 0 0 0 C O 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 ry r o_ _N � 0 N L V d `— t C z y O 7 M y s L L Li L y R R V CCi R M � h � H V h R C M C Q C 00 N 7 M 0 L V d t C � 7 s L O Gin 0 N IT a i o `T A � Iz 7 M u N N d G R M a+ V Q O � � O 7j, "o trl h PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER BUILDING PROJECT BUDGET REPORT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Northrop -Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Contingency 12/03/04 Opening Balance $ 26,030,769 $ 780,817 01/27/05 Change Order (001) 21,065 (21,065) 01/27/05 Change Order (002) 53,835 - 01/28/05 Progress Payment#1 (1,456,157) - 02/24/05 Progress Payment #2 (403,222) - 03/24/05 Progress Payment #3 (375,678) - 05/13/05 Progress Payment #4 (855,272) - 06/10/05 Progress Payment#5 (401,210) - 06/20/05 Change Order (003) - Establish Guaranteed Maximum Price (51,387) 51,387 06/28/05 Change Order (004) - Foundation change 319,034 (319,034) 07/14/05 Progress Payment #6 (378,417) - 07/27/05 Progress Payment #7 (445,669) - 08/10/05 Progress Payment #8 (759,513) - 08/23/05 Change Order (005) - Sewer Line Replacement 124,407 (124,407) 10/05/05 Progress Payment #9 (774,442) - 10/13/05 Change Order (006) - Convert Citations and Warrants Databases no cost - 10/20/05 Progress Payment #10 (664,909) - 12/08/05 Progress Payment #11 (1,196,297) - 12/08/05 Change Order (007) - Minor Changes to Radio Equipment no cost - 12/08/05 Change Order (008) - Additional conduits for redundant 911 feed no cost - Northrop -Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Contingency 12/08/05 Change Order (009) - Regrading slope from road cut south side of Cove Road 3,737 (3,737) 12/08/05 Change Order (010) - Coordination of sewer line with Glen Cove School water line no cost - 12/28/05 Progress Payment #12 (1,130,054) - 01/03/06 Change Order (011) - Refrigerated storage for evidence storage 24,621 (24,621) 01/20/06 Change Order (012) - Modifications to voice radio transition plan (cost offset by E911 funds) 84,060 - 02/02/06 Progress Payment#13 (1,099,134) - 03/09/06 Progress Payment #14 (1,164,468) - 04/05/06 Progress Payment #15 (1,464,883) - 04/18/06 Change Order (013) - Extension of 8" Fire Service Line to rear property line no cost - 04/20/06 Progress Payment#16 (1,671,792) - 06/01/06 Progress Payment #17 (1,307,330) - 06/15/06 Progress Payment #18 (1,902,683) - 06/21/06 Change Order (014) - Modifications to IT Carpet Squares, DAC ES Cards & Console Upgrades 4,823 (4,823) 06/21/06 Change Order (015) - Utility/Permit Allowance for WVWA new Fire Hydrang Fee no cost - 07/20/06 Change Order (016) -Additional security features and office space addition to Police Evidence Storage area 31,723 (31,723) 07/20/06 Change Order (017) - Addition of El FS material to roof screens for improved appearance and additional electrical boxes in Police Polygraph area 49,085 (49,085) 07/27/06 P rog ress P aym e nt #19 (1,592,012) - 09/13/06 Change Order (018) - Increase in size and structural support for Police records section, addition of plumbing in Police Date Description forensics section, deletion of transformer structure and additional WAN links for communications redundancy 09/28/06 Progress Payment #20 10/26/06 Progress Payment #21 11/30/06 Progress Payment #22 12/14/06 Progress Payment #23 01/08/07 Change Order (019) - Minor changes to wiring, outlets, fencing, landscaping, signage, etc. 01/08/07 Change Order (020) - Changes to access control system to allow better remote operations from inside the building and at the vehicle gates 01/25/07 Progress Payment #24 03/15/07 Progress Payment #25 Balance at April 24, 2007 Northrop -Grumman Contract Amount Contingency 8,090 (1,110,618) (1,451, 867) (1,579,614) (556,132) no cost 12,926 (1,117,716) (984, 582) (8,090) (12, 926) $ 873,117 $ 232,693 The funds to be used for change order #002 were taken from departmental E911 funds Submitted By, Dan O'Donnell Asst. County Administrator Approved By, Elmer Hodge County Administrator N C4 c� O Q D r (D I.C') w N m C ti � y O y O y O ~ ti U O O N C oM0 tDD O U M O3 O O O M O KT KT O O N U*) L (N C C C C N O C E V M Q cA N C E w 0) a - O 0 cn U) C (71 W 0 En m 0 = O 0 U U @ N aS 3 �p N C cn C N > O �— O ... ca o U 0 — 0 U U Ocn N = N c m W OQ U -0 c N cn U N 00 c O Q d O U - — O = rn O N m (7 ~ 0 D -D - c cnn c vi Z c4 m _ C C Q = J C O — 0 O CT J W W N j am o �' o m a o-o (D E a� � a3i cn ° °' `nca C m v o °' c ca o LLJ Z m ca m > 0 �_ > 0- ° a mm o w w> ii H 3 `m o N o '� O C 0 0 ° m °° ° m WO O U C = c 0 U O �. O O LL U > O-C '� "� U N O c0 O 0 W U f^ O ai L u1 � 0 V c 0 c to N 0 O 0 V N cU O L OC . cu C C w Q C4 U > O Q CD C O O -D N 0 O L O X 0 w= Z CD 0 w 0�(r U Q (r U U 2 W LL < M N U U_ J 0 CD O N �� O O N N N N O O (D d N N C) C) N N QO 00 00 0 N N O N Q N N N N M N (U N C4 M N O N N N N N N m N - _ N C}II 7 O O (U 7 .0 O 0 0 N N 7 7 — CU C N C m C 7 C 7 O 7 +-' 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N C m C N .` Q C > Q 0 0 0 0 0 Q L L C Z N io - N M lqr U,) CO f-- 00 O O N M T O O O O O O O O O r � r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (U C CU L U N C4 c� O Q D § 0 W. Q) 2 O » U.� 3 0 c 2 .@ L) @ ¥ 0 C14 u 0 k \ k 0m C6 0 2 c % # c 0 cc a k LU j E E k° k @ 2 q ■ % / 0(D « E 2 2 c 0 \ a_ CL W @ § '7 ± / / d)§ k / 0 @ § § \ e g 5 & CL■% E q k § ƒ " % d § c -c $ 0 k 0 \ 5£°-« g O X 2 0 0-5"r--"-OU) � E c co c c \ 0 S ƒ \ q / y : (n a « ® k f % � § $ U) 0 x $ g a 2 0 0 -0 % ƒ 2 7 /_ § f � \ % k o - � ° $ J k ' 2 � 2 % , - � D E 5 W / W � 5 k _a c @ § W m @ 5 � c "ro- c r 2 £ _ T 5 7% R % 2§ / / 2 / § d \ 0) 7 0 \ $ \ g % « c § : k 7 7 ƒ ± f C) ^ I- CD \ R E q \ C14 q / co C6 \ \ § 2 > CL c / ƒ � £ c w 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 7 q \ / o E @ -7 ƒ m0 &E 2\0 20 7 /�� Eby /%k CLE R moo 4LU ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Claims activity for the self-insurance program for the period ended March 31, 2007 SUBMITTED BY: Robert C. Jernigan Risk Manager APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance with the self-insurance program, Ordinance 0-061494-6, Section 2-86.C, attached is the fiscal year to date claims activity report including the third quarter that ended March 31, 2007. Attachment A --- Auto, Attachment B — General Liability. V (V Imo ' O O 'l O' 01(D. O; co r 0) O O V C) C. O O co co O O O O j O (D' 61 O I M I 6 Cp O 6' O 6: O O '1 V I- O (D (0, O - CO O LO ., CL O (D O Oj O O1, O O O O iO N O U r M (3)', N U (O N ti lD O I i Lo O I O co O, O O O' O' O O O 0, OI O C -OAC O (A O O: v O Pi O O O O j O O ., CL O (D O Oj O O1, O O O O iO O U U U U (O N ti lD O Lo O of p Z 0' 0 0 0; 0 0 0� UI 0 U' 01 U!, 0 U F 01 0! 0 U 04 ' U U U U LO U i (al I I (D (: D (D (D (D 1, (D 11 COI CO 1'I Q C CD E L U (6 Q N O m rn (0 a O O N r w 'O 'O 'O. C' C -OAC C 4� O O O L CX OOo CL OI l no O U U U U U In ti of p Z 0' 0 0 0; 0 0 0� UI 0 U' 01 U!, 0 U F 01 0! 0 U 04 ' U U U U U U (al Q Q''I Q QI Q gI Q >, Q > w O 07 O" CL L 1 C li 0 of t, v CL m' >I 0 c d Wy Y11 ca 0 0, c Ei ( cc 3 C6 N r 2 (0 tD SII �' mI rn all wI rn UJ p o '0 m, m C os o W O N -0, E E m. o E E' 1I E o -II m m � ' a -0o -`°0 CL p Ll. o Y L U = U = N N a "O �, -0 O U I LL O N O L2 O > Y Y COY cc ui V a d� (D � N L O L O > N'; y NI O V"� E E 5 I E U N N O (D (` (0 (0 m N W .'U > U O CO in N O U N N O N ' U) ur -.s C U le U C C U U (0 (0 m L z o f- '0 � �° ;� - 2' o cc �' 1 o -o LL =1 ml cI cc m' cI J Q N' Y C U Y 0l C O! C_ cm C_ C Y 3! w to Y N Y n N f Y W 'U'. CO ` I U W Y Y N U U U W U li f0 a V N 1 (0 L CO (0 N i 2 N 2 N LLJ J - � m COl CO (c m m m' m i :g a :9! :° 72 tii 0'1 0 00l of o� o', (D 0'1 o1 0 0 01 O d d (n (n : co d. (n d co co w W, d 1 ISI I z.' (D 0 LO (D 0 0 (D o f (D o 1 (D 0 to 0 �� 0 r- 0 r-1' o r 0 r - 0' r- o u 3s1' O O O O O O O O O O O CD O N N M O t.- (: OO (moi M r N N m1 r D m r m r O M� N M Q O (D OD, O O r r r N r O I N O I O O M O M O j l —�_- - M O) N N a0 O M � ao M O j V N M n .r ,k1- O r O , O' O , O� O (A O (D O CD O 1� O O' O' (D (: D (D (D (D 1, (D 11 COI CO 1'I Q C CD E L U (6 Q N O m rn (0 a O O N r w Q c N E L m m a N 0 N N 0, m a r - C) 0 N CD ti N U � Q O � d W , m W a HN N r o � � J � W Q r ci Z a WLu � co Z p LL uj J fA Q tUj W J � t - N W z' LL tsi a ¢I I- Z ui > UJ ui Of .19 U U' Q c N E L m m a N 0 N N 0, m a r - C) 0 N m c a) E (6 Q N O (D V LU . i'. .. N W O' g: O' 91 O OI i i i 13.E _O O O _O C I i J- O OO Oi >I >, > NW o W W H °' c0i N T m D } J U ? a LU W 0 - cn L) .a y Z' WI' W W a 70, m ;i o T tv 3' N y W' -o` 3 o v,;a � C, W aa'i ami ami aUi m io co m ¢I c m (� �I L! E, E ca E E LL I w cI m m ccca co AU �n �n tu O N N .� N N �r co ` n co r C3! Z n n r= m c a) E (6 Q N O (D V m Q 71 0 N m a � N W N 1W 0 r M 2 Ch W fA r m W a ZLUW Z Z p ii O' � J W N W p Z LLI Q W O Z LLJ ui Z ¢' uJ w � w, O U � 4 W F p a m Q 71 0 N m a ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) of changes to the secondary road system for the first quarter of 2007 SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge orl� County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the list of all changes to the secondary system of state highways in Roanoke County approved by the Director of the Asset Management Division in January, February, and March 2007. All changes to the secondary system, with the exception of legal discontinuances, are effective the day they are approved by the Director of the Local Assistance Division. L w R F O 0~i �r t d C4 C4 r r N eo r O 0 0 QI i 0 N N tu 0 N ''.. `,, r n r O O O 0 0 0 N N N I o _ LU v v o N N w o r r 00 0o N eo N ! N O QI i CN c V) tu 0 r 0 N C7 M O d O QI i ''.. `,, LU N w o dl m W CJ O N d 7 0 lY ` o N ! 1 N a F- ',, C O O a 3 Cf III LL �o C -0 u� r O R P7 '.. r i4 N ''. M !. Y7 0 _' d 0 0 W o 0 m d d E e '° E d E 1..1 O lei O j LL; J O LL J O LL C J O LL 9 a c O of F E C � 9 w N H 9 w N O H LL G7v H a)d H a a) H V c c$ c r O llj N U-) M C7 ('7 N a s s s a o . a o 'a o, rm v V v V v V �- QT0U tV of Yvonuoh-e air p� ROANp�F -� i� � as f- �o Z 0 0 - - - - - 1838 DECLARING APRIL 29 THROUGH MAY 5, 2007, AS MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CLERKS WEEK IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal/County Clerk, a time honored and vital part of local government exists throughout the world; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal/County Clerk is the oldest among public servants; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal/County Clerk provides the professional link between the citizens, the local governing bodies, and agencies of government at other levels; and WHEREAS, Municipal/County Clerks have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and impartiality, rending equal service to all; and WHEREAS, the Municipal/County Clerk serves as the information center on functions of local government and community; and WHEREAS, Municipal/County Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of their office through participation in education programs, seminars, workshops, and the annual meetings of their state, province, county, and international professional organizations. NOW THEREFORE, I, Joseph P. McNamara, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim and recognize April 29 through May 7, 2007, as MUNICIPAL/COUNTY CLERKS WEEK; and FURTHER, extend appreciation to Diane Childers, Clerk to the Board; Brenda Holton, Deputy Clerk to the Board; Mary Brandt, Assistant Deputy Clerk; and to all Municipal/County Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent. h�D' 4. lk�� Diane S. Childers, Clerk ?ep�'h!3- McNamara, Chairman Elmer C. Hodge, Count Administrator lLQ1tYitv of Ywauake rc aural VA, t�- OF FIOAA/O� F Z �p 2 � J a� 1838 DECLARING APRIL 2007 AS KITE MONTH IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, kite flying is a family friendly, nonpolluting, healthy, educational, and fun activity; and WHEREAS, throughout the history of our nation, kite fliers have made numerous contributions to the arts, sciences, mathematics, and history including: > Benjamin Franklin who used kites in his meteorological research to prove that lightning is electricity, > Homan Walsh who flew a kite across Niagara Falls to deliver the first line needed to build a suspension bridge across the Niagara Gorge, > Alexander Graham Bell who used kites in his experiments to build a heavier-than- air flying machine, > The Wright Brothers who used kites to test their theories leading to the invention of the airplane, and > Paul Garber who used kites during World War II as targets to train naval gun crews and as a method of transferring important papers from ship to ship; and WHEREAS, in recognition of this proud history, the American Kitefliers Association and the Kite Trade Association International have designated April as National Kite Month. NOW THEREFORE, I, Joseph P. McNamara, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim and recognize April 2007, as KITE MONTH in the County of Roanoke; and FURTHER, I encourage the citizens of Roanoke County to attend one of the many kite festivals and workshops being held across the Commonwealth of Virginia such as the Blue Ridge Kite Festival held each spring at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County. .i lL1 u J VJ • ak�bL1/ Diane S. Childers, Clerk ?eph P. McNamara, Chairman Elmer C. Hodge, Counti Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Work session with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) staff to discuss Route 221 and other County road issues. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is an opportunity for the Board of Supervisors to meet with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation to discuss VDOT proposed modification to Route 221 project, local funding, and recent transportation bill which relates to land use and access management. FISCAL IMPACT: Ikq 5 M12 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Request that the Board of Supervisors authorize staff to bring back to the board at the next public meeting a resolution of support to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the proposed modification to the Route 221 project. No AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. R-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt a resolution of support to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the proposed modification to the Route 221 project SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge fC9 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. This recommendation comes to you following many hours of effort on the part of the residents of Cezanne Court, VDOT, and County staff. There are two possible solutions to address the concerns of the residents in this area: (1) construction of a retaining wall with fencing along the top of the wall; or (2) a slight shift in the alignment of the road within the existing VDOT right-of-way. Both of these alternatives represent an improvement to the original plan and will provide greater buffering between the homes in the cul-de-sac and the new road. A meeting is scheduled for Friday, April 20 for County staff, VDOT, and citizen representatives to meet and discuss final recommendations. Due to the timing of distribution of the agenda, we are unable to include a specific recommendation with your agenda packet; however, we will have this information for you at the April 24 meeting. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 26, 1995, the Board of Supervisors adopted resolution No. 92695-2 expressing approval and support of the Virginia Department of Transportation's Route 221 project, Bent Mountain Road. High accident and fatality rates and the continued growth of the area prompted the need for this project. In 2002, the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) removed the Route 221 project from the Primary and Interstate Six Year Improvement Plan due to insufficient funds. It was not until fiscal year 2005-2006 that the CTB reinstated Route 221 from Coleman Road to Cotton Hill Road into the Primary and Interstate Six Year Improvement Plan. At that time, the only funds allocated to this project were the funds necessary to complete the preliminary engineering. In 2005, VDOT changed the funding of this project from fully state funded to a combination of federal and state funding. This change requires VDOT to update environmental studies and post a notice for public comments. Citizens on Cezanne Court in the Gardens of Cotton Hill raised concerns about the proposed Route 221 corridor because the construction would come much closer to their homes than anticipated. The issues raised by the citizens included the following: (1) proximity of the road to the Cezanne Court cul- de-sac and related safety issues (see Attachment 1); and (2) visual impacts that would result from the road construction such as removal of trees and grading. To address these concerns, VDOT and County staff have met several times with the citizens on Cezanne Court to review the history of the project and determine what options might be available. At that time, the citizen group requested that VDOT consider a realignment of the Route 221 corridor through this area to position the road further away from the cul-de-sac. VDOT advised that any significant change to the road design would require the acquisition of additional right-of-way which would increase the cost of the project. Further, such realignment would impact other adjoining property owners and the existing topography. Two solutions that have been proposed by VDOT to minimize the impact to the residents include the following: (1) construction of a retaining wall or other like structures to minimize the slope impact of the roadway; or (2) make minor adjustments to the roadway alignment to minimize these same slope impacts. These modifications should be implemented within the existing right-of-way along the Route 221 corridor and should be implemented for a cost not to exceed 10 percent of the project's total cost. Once construction funding is allocated by VDOT, the project will be ready for construction. FISCAL IMPACT: No allocation of Roanoke County funds is required. Funding will be provided through the VDOT Primary and Interstate Six Year Improvement Plan, and VDOT has advised that these additional project costs should not affect any other Roanoke County interstate or primary projects. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the attached resolution. 2. Do not adopt the attached resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE ROUTE 221 PROJECT WHEREAS, on September 26, 1995, the Board of Supervisors passed Resolution Number 92695-2 expressing approval and support of the Virginia Department of Transportation's project Route 221, Bent Mountain Road; and WHEREAS, Route 221 is currently identified as a project by the Commonwealth Transportation Board in the Primary and Interstate Fiscal Year 2008-2013 Six Year Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, following many hours of effort on the part of the residents of Cezanne Court, VDOT, and County staff, a plan was developed which provides greater buffering between homes along the cul-de-sac on Cezanne Court and Route 221; and WHEREAS, this proposed solution is to be funded out of the VDOT Salem District Primary allocation and VDOT is requiring Roanoke County to agree to the change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in order to minimize the impact to the residents of Cezanne Court in the Gardens of Cotton Hill, requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation take the necessary action to minimize the roadway's impacts on this neighborhood. The actions that will be considered include the following: (1) construction of a retaining wall or other like structures with fence on top to minimize the slope impacts of the roadway or making minor adjustments to the roadway alignment to minimize these same slope impacts; or (2) make minor adjustments to the roadway alignment to minimize these same slope impacts. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors concurs that these modifications should be implemented within the existing right of way along the Route 221 corridor and should be implemented at a cost not to exceed 10 percent of the project's total cost. Vote Moved by:_ Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary V. Brandt, Assistant Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Teresa Becher, Transportation Engineering Manager Richard Caywood, Salem District Administrator, Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. ITEM NO. S— i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to the Cave Spring High School Forensics Team for winning the Lincoln -Douglas Debate at the National Forensics League District Competition APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Cave Spring High School Forensics Team won the Lincoln -Douglas Debate at the National Forensics League (NFL) District Competition which was held in Front Royal, Virginia, on January 27, 2007. The district is comprised of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The NFL is the leading honor society and educational resource for teachers, students, administrators, and parents in the field of speech and debate education. With over 2,700 member schools and 90,000 active student members, the NFL strives to promote the art of speech and debate by providing educational opportunities, honors, scholarships, and awards to recognize students at local, regional, and national levels. In addition to the team members and their advisor, the following individuals are expected to attend the meeting: Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; and Martha Cobble, Cave Spring High School Principal. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL FORENSICS TEAM FOR WINNING THE LINCOLN -DOUGLAS DEBATE CHAMPIONSHIP AT THE NATIONAL FORENSICS LEAGUE DISTRICT COMPETITION WHEREAS, academics are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, and students are encouraged to take advantage of every opportunity to broaden their knowledge and learning experiences, and WHEREAS, the National Forensics League is the leading honor society and educational resource for teachers, students, administrators and parents in the field of speech and debate education; and WHEREAS, the Cave Spring High School Forensics Team won the Lincoln -Douglas Debate at the Nationai Forensics League District Competition which was held in Front Royal, Virginia, on January 27, 2007; and WHEREAS, the advisor for the Cave Spring High School Forensics Team is Bob Powers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL FORENSICS TEAM: Heidi Fredstrom, Caroline Muelenaer, Jackie Zillioux, and Kathryn Lawryszek, for their academic ability, their commitment, and their team spirit; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Board of Supervisors extends its bestwishes to the members of the team, the advisor, and the school in their future endeavors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 6-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Certificate of recognition for Catherine White, Northside High School, for winning three State Group AA Track Championships in 2006 APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to recognize Catherine White, a senior at Northside High School, for winning three Group AA state track championships in 2006 giving Ms. White a career total of ten state championships. Ms. White will attend the University of Arkansas this fall on a full athletic scholarship. The following is a partial listing of Ms. White's accomplishments during her outstanding high school career: • Virginia High School League AA cross country champion (2004, 2005, 2006) • Group AA indoor track and field champion in the 800 (2006), 1,600 (2005, 2006), and 3,200 meters (2005, 2006) • Group AA outdoor track and field champion in the 800 (2005) and 3,200 meters (2005) • Named Virginia's female track athlete of the year in 2006 by Gatorade • Named 2006 Timesland female athlete of the year • Placed 11th in the Foot Locker national cross country meet in 2005 Ms. White will be present to accept her certificate of recognition. The following people have been invited to attend: Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; Frank Dent, Principal; members of the coaching staff; and Ms. White's parents. 1 I ' I� l i 1• lt CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO CATHERINE WHITE for winning three Group AA State Championships in 2006 Catherine White, a senior at Northside High School, won three State championships in 2006 giving her a career total of ten State championships in track and cross country. Ms. White achieved the following honors during her outstanding high school career: • Virginia High School League AA cross country State champion in 2004, 2005, and 2006 • Group AA indoor track and field State champion in the 800 meters in 2006, the 1,600 meters in 2005 and 2006, and the 3,200 meters in 2005 and 2006 • Group AA outdoor track and field State champion in the 800 meters in 2005 and 3,200 meters in 2005 • Gatorade's Virginia female track athlete of the year in 2006 • Timesland 2006 female athlete of the year. • 11th in the Foot Locker national cross country meet in 2005 Ms. White has demonstrated exceptional athletic ability and good sportsmanship and has completed an impressive career in track and cross country. The Board of Supervisors congratulations Ms. White upon her athletic achievements and expresses its best wishes to her in her future college career at the University of Arkansas. Presented this 24th day of April, 2007 oMcNamara, Chairman Richard C. Flora, Vice -Chairman h,� 2� . Michael W. Altizer os h B. "Butch" Church Michael A. Wray ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of and public hearing for the proposed budget for fiscal year 2007-2008 and the fiscal year 2008-2012 Capital Improvements Program I SUBMITTED BY: Elmer Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I AO SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a presentation of and public hearing for the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 2007-2008 and the fiscal year 2008-2012 Capital Improvements Program. This will include an overview of the proposed budget by the County and staff. A summary of the proposed budget was advertised in the Roanoke Times on April 17, 2007, and information previously discussed with the Board regarding the proposed budget was distributed to all Roanoke County libraries. Beginning late fall, the Board and staff worked closely together to review local revenue estimates, state funding issues, capital improvement projects, health insurance costs, and other costs of operations. In addition, the Board has hosted presentations from operating departments and Human Service, Cultural, and Tourism agencies to hear and then consider each group's budget requests for fiscal year 2007-2008. This overview outlines the major issues and funding needs that have been addressed in prior work sessions. The remainder of the budget process is as follows: April 24, 2007 1st reading of the Appropriation Ordinance May 8, 2007 2nd Reading of the Appropriation Ordinance May 8, 2007 Adoption of Annual Budget and Capital Improvements Plan County of Roanoke Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2007-2008 April 24, 2007 Prepared by Department of Management and Budget www. roanokecountyva. gov County of Roanoke Proposed FY2007-2008 Budget Table of Contents County Administrator's Message .............................................. i Financial Summaries............................................................... 1 Summary of Proposed Budget ............................................... 1 General Government Revenue Summary ................................ 3 General Government Expenditure Summary ............................ 4 Departmental Expenditure Summary ...................................... 5 Capital Projects and Funding ................................................... 7 FY08-12 Summary of Capital Projects (Funded) 7 FY08-12 Summary of Capital Projects (Unfunded) 8 Contribution Requests............................................................. 10 Health and Human Service Agencies ..................................... 10 Cultural, Tourism, and Other Agencies ................................... 12 Additional Funding Requests ................................................... 14 Summary of Additional Departmental Requests (Unfunded)........ 14 Detail of Additional Departmental Requests (Unfunded) ............. 15 Additional Position Requests (Unfunded) ................................ 20 County of Roanoke FY2007-2008 Proposed Budget I am pleased to present the Proposed FY 2007-2008 budget to the Board of Supervisors and citizens of Roanoke County. This budget represents the priorities of Roanoke County. The budget is the result of a collaborative effort between the Board of Supervisors, the School Board, the citizens, and staff that allows us to continue providing the services that support our quality of life, and to continue attracting new businesses to the area. The budget is balanced, and includes a reduction in the real estate tax rate from $1.11 to $1.09. This reduction provides tax relief in the amount of $1,460,000 to the taxpayers of Roanoke County for FY2008. In addition, enhancements to the Real Estate Credit for the Elderly and Disabled program were approved by the Board of Supervisors. These changes increased the net worth limit for citizens over age 65 or who are disabled to become eligible to freeze their real estate assessments. Additional highlights of the Proposed FY2007-2008 budget are as follows: Revenues • General Government Fund revenues are projected at $161,707,779 --an increase of 6.6% over last year's beginning projections of $151,667,991. Real Estate, Personal Property, Sales Tax, and Business License revenues continue to provide consistent, stable growth with which to fund needed services and support our school system. Expenditures PUBLIC SAFETY Police Department: Calls for service have increased over the past year from approx. 89,000 to 93,300 (5%). Schools have also requested a SRO at Arnold R. Burton, which is the only high school that does not have one. To address these needs, an additional patrol unit (6 Officers) and an SRO for Arnold R. Burton are included in this budget, but funding limitations dictate that these positions be added at mid -year (effective January 1). Increased funding from the state of $122,000 will cover most of the $155,000 cost. The cost of 6 vehicles associated with the new positions would be allocated from projected year-end revenue surplus ($210,000). During FY06-07, an additional Patrol District (6 positions) was funded for % year, as well as 3 vehicles. The proposed budget includes the full -year funding of these positions and funding for the 3 remaining vehicles associated with the positions. Fire & Rescue: During 2006, the Hollins station routed approximately 900 calls for service to other stations. This highlights the need to construct a new station in the north county area. • Land has been purchased; $200,000 has been funded for A & E out of anticipated year-end revenues. 4 additional Paramedic/Firefighters for the Hollins station have been included for'/ year by utilizing projected increases in rescue transport fees of $125,000. While the new station is constructed, the additional staffing will be assigned to the new north county station to reduce the number of calls turned over to other stations. Cost increases for retirement benefits available to Volunteers have also been funded in the amount of $150,000 as an incentive to those volunteers who provide a valuable service to our citizens. Sheriff: Jail population continues to increase. As a result, more inmates are being outsourced to other correctional facilities. Funding of $500,000 has been included in the Sheriffs budget to cover this increased cost. This funding will be used to help off -set per diem charges for County prisoners when the Western Virginia Regional Jail opens. EDUCATION Joint County/School Capital Funding: A growing population and aging infrastructure is placing demands for construction of new facilities and renovation/upgrades to old facilities. The original agreement with Schools was to increase capital allocations each year by $300,000 to help fund County and School capital projects. Based on discussions with the Board and School Board the original allocation will be increased as follows: • Annual Incremental Increase $300,000 • Additional Contribution for FY07-08 $200,000 The FY07-08 transfer to Capital will be $1,100,000. Schools will make the same allocation. School Operations: The County will increase its transfer by $3,773,992 for FY07-08. CAPITAL FACILITIES In addition to the capital projects mentioned earlier, there are several other important projects that are currently in the planning stages. The new south County library, 800 MHz Radio System Upgrade, Renovations to the existing Jail, the County Garage, and the north county Multi -Generational Center will be great additions to the our community. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Final implementation of the HP Migration project will require $400,000 over the next three years for the Real Estate Valuation, Personal Property, Billings, and Collections systems. $150,000 is required for FY07-08 and will be allocated from projected year-end balances. Each new system implementation requires the need for additional support. To keep up these critical applications, I have included $67,500 for 1/2 year funding of a Network Engineer and a Systems Analyst that will be allocated from year-end revenues. OTHER OPERATIONAL COSTS • Utilities—New Public Safety Center $200,000 • CPMT Increases (County and Schools) $600,000 • Technology—software licenses; maintenance agreements $240,000 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • 3.5% Salary Increase (same as Schools) $1,610,000 • Health Insurance Increase (est. 7%) $385,000 • Dental Increase $34,000 Conclusion I would like to thank the members of the Board of Supervisors for their hard work and guidance throughout this budget year. The Office of Management and Budget is also to be commended for their work in organizing and facilitating the process and providing information needed for informed decision making. In addition, I would like to thank the School Board, superintendent and staff for their cooperation and willingness to work with the Board and County staff to bring together a plan that provides for all of the citizens of Roanoke County. County of Roanoke Proposed FY2007-2008 Budget Table of Contents County Administrator's Message .............................................. i Financial Summaries............................................................... 1 Summary of Proposed Budget ............................................... 1 General Government Revenue Summary ................................ 3 General Government Expenditure Summary ............................ 4 Departmental Expenditure Summary ...................................... 5 Capital Projects and Funding ................................................... 7 FY08-12 Summary of Capital Projects (Funded) 7 FY08-12 Summary of Capital Projects (Unfunded) 8 Contribution Requests............................................................. 10 Health and Human Service Agencies ..................................... 10 Cultural, Tourism, and Other Agencies,.... .............................. 12 Additional Funding Requests ................................................... 14 Summary of Additional Departmental Requests (Unfunded)........ 14 Detail of Additional Departmental Requests (Unfunded) ............. 15 Additional Position Requests (Unfunded) ..... . .. . ...... . ................ 20 County of Roanoke Summary of Proposed 2007-2008 Budget Revenue Estimates Amount General Fund 6,580,006 General Government 41,648 General Property Taxes $ 111,247,000 Local Sales Tax 8,800,000 Business License Tax 5,675,000 Utility Consumer Tax 2,125,000 Motor Vehicle License Tax 1,960,000 Recordation/Conveyance Tax 1,700,000 Meals Tax 3,375,000 Cellular Phone Tax 1,515,000 Other Local Taxes 1,820,000 Permits, Fees & Licenses 639,500 Fines and Forfeitures 739,000 Interest Income 1,007,500 Charges for Services 2,979,900 Commonwealth 13,895,279 Federal 3,405,000 Beginning Balance 672,501 Other 824,600 Total General Government 162,380,280 E-911 Maintenance 477,958 Comprehensive Services 6,580,006 Law Library 41,648 VJCCCA/Life Skills 295,445 S B & T Building 444,580 Recreation Fee Class 1,173, 706 Internal Services - Information Technology 4,026,640 County Garage 613,415 Total General Fund 176,033,678 Debt Service Fund - County 4,476,004 Capital Projects Fund 5,746,935 Internal Service Fund 991,779 School Operating Fund 135,091,375 School Nutrition Fund 4,974,000 School Debt Service Fund 9,500,487 School Grants Fund 5,123,147 School Capital Fund 1,153,442 School Textbook Fund 1,307,185 School Bus Fund 760,000 School Laptop Insurance Reserve 549,495 Regional Alternative School 520,437 Total Revenues All Funds 346,227,964 Less: Transfers (92,374,767) Total Net of Transfers 253,853,197 County of Roanoke Proposed Expenditures Amount General Fund 6,580,006 General Government 41,648 General Administration $ 3,173,882 Constitutional Officers 10,427,202 Judicial Administration 1,115,435 Management Services 3,218,602 Public Safety 22,601,063 Community Services 12,390,727 Human Services 16,217,412 Non -Departmental 8,849,471 Transfers to School Operating Fund 62,450,497 Transfers to School Insurance - Dental 452,299 Transfers to Capital Fund 5,746,935 Transfers to Debt Service Fund 10,393,396 Transfer to Comprehensive Services 3,753,000 Transfer to County Garage 139,634 Other 1,450,725 Total General Government 162,380,280 E-911 Maintenance 477,958 Comprehensive Services 6,580,006 Law Library 41,648 VJCCCA/Life Skills 295,445 S B & T Building 444,580 Recreation Fee Class 1,173,706 Internal Services - Information Technology 4,026,640 County Garage 613,415 Total General Fund 176,033,678 Debt Service Fund - County 4,476,004 Capital Projects Fund 5,746,935 Internal Service Fund 991,779 School Operating Fund 135,091,375 School Nutrition Fund 4,974,000 School Debt Fund 9,500,487 School Grants Fund 5,123,147 School Capital Fund 1,153,442 School Textbook Fund 1,307,185 School Bus Fund 760,000 School Laptop Insurance Reserve 549,495 Regional Alternative School 520,437 Total Expenditures All Funds 346,227,964 Less: Transfers (92,374,767) Total Net of Transfers 253,853,197 2 A u 3 Ln000000000o00000oo00ma 0 r- rn r- 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 Lo 0 r 0 O 0 00 y Lo C) V)00LO 000000V LOU'>W00o0 Ict O ti LO N 0) to Co Ln W) Ni O Lc L() Ln O 0 Lt) O LCA eN c*i r Ln O N N Ln 0 N N 1-N V- r—O C)Loti O CD �OItNmm O cO -' m Il - r d C7 0 1` Ln m r N 01 �" r Lp ( O co ti Ld r N N O O oo O O N 000000000000000Oa000rn0 0 �- O L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti 0 r- O 00 0000000000000 LA O 000 ,,qtN N 0 1,- Lc) N L O cc 4) p1, OLANOLc Ln 0000 Ln Ln000)i1-d'Lnrc�LnLO 1: N 1, O 0 Q p "0 C>CAM0Nr-tl000Orr--COMc*)00rl-0c�00 O N CL p LO LorCOr(OltOti1,M000COHOCOr0r00 V r ti CD m O m> CA o0 C7 O N L() r- �- V') N M (*7 r N U. N r CD E ULfl Cfi c �N C 0 00000000000000000000CD0 r O r CLC)O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U") 0LCOO CA 0 0 O V OLn00Ln0000000rLDOhOc)0000 CA 0 > L d (D 0r�0000LoC)00L66vi e .17d6C CD NO 1z h 0- r p -a rON w000OOLn�mLC)mm00�LoNCD01- 0 c0 aI G NOrOr-MVOOLOCOO tLOCO CflCD000 CO Cfl V I� cli Cb -V wi v r r N 0 m r r _ Q m IL � N r r m Ri t8- E LQ O N > ' O t0 0O O -- N LL G d � Q, x O m Q � a) U U >. N LO -O C ate) N N F— a) N CL CU d txp N x(o N C cn o N LO C n- '"- LL E F— x m x C O x _U a) a) ` a) F— U m N- i O U a) a) a) L t � d (1) L -C Co) N xy x m c a) J x x ors a) m Z LL y L C O r m m a) o coJ ) CL LL NN "D a)pU) xtn- O +, nUL pO�3 RC CL L) > `V� Ota)LL J � m m a) a) Q (iLcn (]C) + O 0 O AN O a) - m aL a)a)+OD m ,A ��UO�LL�U��UIL �CLOJ 3 .Q M00ONr0 CA 1-O 1-ONODMOrON O O CA .-+ M r O M M M tl ti O N r 00 LC) O O CO O V O O CD 0)T-- CO O O r 1` O r N O O M M O V_ O O O It O O N CA N (O Ll) LC') CA ti LC) cr V- N O M 1- ti IN: M LC) 1 CT M O O N CO O O N O r 1- O 1- LO r 0 C'M 0 M N N O LC) U') 1- `I I- LC) N O M N m CO M CO C'7 M ti U v rlqt G) r r N M r CO �.. O_ C 0 v C7 1- 00 d' M T- < Q m LL .Q N N LO N M I- N r 0 0 co CO 1- 00 LC) CA ti O el' O O O COO MOON r 11-00 OOOCALnMCACOOM O 00 O N v (O O 1` CD O LC) 1-- (O 'Y O CA N 1-- O (O O N 4) �i c) ti LC) 06 r O ti 00ci r CO d O 1` (O N N C 7 (A O O 1� O i` N r- r O O) r O I%r CA O O LCA LO q U) CA V) M 'T C'7 O 1- O CL . m } r d r N CO M N MSO rMNN (D OD I- N M Mr CO 1` 1- d' r Ch(DN Ln M r CL LL to I- N r 00 CA h M O ti lqY CA CA r .Q d NLo'IT rCON NMO r1, -MC)" A(OON O O Y V OMCOmmm NNO OOOr d'CAOOCA O O CO 11 LC) "T ti M m M CO_ N LC) OO O_ r '' N ti O r O O CA G� ty G t_ r 0 CO C d CO h r - F N M M ti r CO(O O O h to I- N r 00 CA h M O ti lqY CA CA r Ln N h LO M LO to (O 0 'a O CA t` r O CD OO CA N M O U) O OO rlqt G) r r N C'7 CO �.. M r- (r) N r LO C`7 C'') �- C7 1- 00 d' M T- < Q m LL L U OJ 0�0ai W� rnc°', m m E `_' Q) � U c c: rn U + C M O U NU O N' 2! O CO +C N ' N 4. > C NN > >` f6 'C •-+ U m 0 C 0 a C (D m 0 O (U 'a) :t, N Q E M O N `� O U O N m C N Mu =Q co cU) o �— �C)co o� o o C3 0) C E N CU = ` U M M L r C1 � ` E (D O O G i N to U CII _ C C� �� E E c 4) •cn CW c� = N N Ucr) W O U O UCn SL) co lu O (D C) a- 0 2 Z f400cn H m D +� X O W F - .Q County of Roanoke Department Expenditure Summary Adopted 2006-2007 and Proposed 2007-2008 Expenditure Budget General Government General Administration Board of Supervisors County Administrator Public Information Asst Co Administrators Human Resources County Attorney Economic Development Total General Administration Constitutional Officers Treasurer Commonwealth Attorney Commissioner of the Revenue Clerk of the Circuit Court Sheriff's Office Total Constitutional Officers Judicial Administration Circuit Court General District Court Magistrate J&DR Court Court Service Unit Total Judicial Administration Management Services Real Estate Assessments Finance Public Transportation - CORTRAN Management and Budget Procurement Services Total Management Services Public Safety Police Department Fire and Rescue Total Public Safety Community Services General Services Community Development Building Maintenance Total Community Services 5 Adopted 2006-2007 Budget 376,293 279,344 237,267 351,339 599,395 485,168 648,938 2,977,744 743,634 764,594 729,728 956,528 6,527,108 9,721,592 197,068 40,878 1,655 13,429 857,405 1,110,435 905,852 1,200,855 330,476 258,492 393,089 3,088,764 10, 565, 379 Proposed 2007-2008 Budget 394,076 292,464 248,452 367,144 674,274 510,978 686,494 3,173,882 787,273 851,503 813,516 979,673 6,995,237 10,427,202 197,068 40,878 1,655 18,429 857,405 1,115,435 929,291 1,240,426 380,476 260,549 407,860 3,218,602 11,704,863 10, 328, 512 10,896,200 20,893, 891 22,601,063 5,033,039 4,869,454 1,972,503 11,874,996 5,113,768 5,055,580 2,221,379 12,390,727 County of Roanoke Department Expenditure Summary Adopted 2006-2007 and Proposed 2007-2008 Expenditure Budget Human Services Grounds Maintenance Parks and Recreation Public Health Social Services Administration Public Assistance Institutional Care Contributions Library VA Cooperative Extension Elections Total Human Services Non -Departmental Employee Benefits Intemal Service Charges Miscellaneous Total Non -Departmental Transfers to Other Funds Adopted 2006-2007 Budget 2,020,199 2,723,079 509,668 4,462,957 2,619,500 33,100 686,491 2,502,514 94,129 Proposed 2007-2008 Budget 2,100,790 2,519,500 527,668 4,635,047 2,619,500 25,245 731,794 2,664,749 94,129 286,745 298,990 15,938,382 16,217,412 3,207,822 3,808,971 3,371,223 3,749,000 1,041,500 1,291,500 7,620,545 8,849,471 Transfer to Debt -General 3,594,881 3,608,708 Transfer to Debt -School 7,092,007 6,784,688 Transfer to Capital 4,153,442 5,746,935 Transfer to Schools 58,813,115 62,450,497 Transfer to E-911 - 357,958 Transfer to Schools Dental Insuran( 427,299 452,299 Transfer to Internal Services 971,706 992,767 Transfer to CPMT-County 1,604,000 11904,000 Transfer to CPMT-Schools 1,549,000 1,849,000 Transfer to Garage 11 136,192 139,634 Total Transfers to Other Funds 78,341,642 84,286,486 Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Total Unappropriated Balance 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total General Government 151,667,991 162,380,280 N E m T 0) 0 Q y w c Q% n' d .O W L 0 (D M o' D a� w- E o o U- +t�_' 0 C OL :3 c U v E N E T N:3 Cl) OD O N LL p c a C 3 O LL p Q LL O Mc w v �N- 0 O O O O O M O Ct 0 o u7 N H 0 O O O O O M O O C 0 0 1n N M 0 O O O O N w O O C 0 0 M O 0 O C O O 19 w O O O 0 0 (9) N fA 0 O O O O r O O OC 0 0 C Lc) (a 0 O O O O O K O O 0 0 O W) 0 O O O t0 VT N O 0 t - t- 0 Il m fA 0 O h n co N N O CDC CL n m N wi 0 O O OO n .N O C 0 O O O CN 0 O O O O N O o CL o o m 1^i to D O O O O N O O o Lo r o O O_ b h N 1l) LO II N m .- ai m fA w 90 P N CO r M r O N O w O O o o O) 11f (a o O O O p ? N p � ap pj 0 O A N m W N O o 1n u) o p 00 Cym o 0 n1 M O p L F O N N � 6% vW O O r N O O O O O O O N N c'i tD O Q O o 0 0 co M O O 0 1O g � to v v n w w fa fis o N p o o O a o o M o p N O O O O O ED 0 C p" LO 110'/ 10 � O CO a) N 10 O to O M d! W GollfA fA V! to N C" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n m C) p O 0 O C O C O C O 0 O Ct O o O O O O O CL 1, N c+) io O p N O S S h O O O O O M rn O 10 ^ 69 O to Vi G% H to H N O N w 6% Nt N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o n 1n o p 0 p 0 o 0 o o C O o oO C C o 0 0 00 0 N � O 0 o 0 p N O O q o O O O O O v U[ O p r O 1n O V) O O O N 0 C m N M N b r Vi O m 10 L tD ty O w w N 61,uy t+� fA fA 69 W to O N Nw O O O O O 0 O O p 0 O O O oO O O O O m O C O S CI d O N M o p } ^ C O O is 1l) O 7 C61A w w 4 LL W d a ns rn � n 7 W N 0 7 d C Y @ O U UJ a UO la V C tS tll _'p QI m 0> 0 O f0 (O L C 0p m U C U �+ m - K d Ij o n m w A O n w o E C 2 p 4 O N O O to W R J lL. Y O L O iio L mmg d u C d C C Q' 3 j � O z V CL y` f' N Z Q � ) O 0 L O J 0 E N u E 0 b C) A 2 yW U fn O U tp a' r2 0 O O a O ° C ES r 'o ¢ r Ufs = ca s e, L a R C d O N m a)i a)3: A p d 0 a) 7 d C o 0 O U Z d � A m d Z G Z a (o C7 L C? O it W U U) .0., d O w �n a' a -j a 5 12 O 0 o m g b 4 O p O m m N M N M N M O 0 c W 8 Ct8 w 0 0 ct N IA o o o m W M w N O 1C O p O to W M W vJ w I a o m mU N a m r co O V LL ca L -U O 0- a- wa 4.1� c -a � E c� o n 0 a E� 0 4 - CU CU c UU.= N O Tl- O Z+ N cu 0 E O E O N >. U) U - 0 E w Z G m d Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o O o 0 N t0 Lo U") !A to a CL CL 0 O 0 0 M o 0 0 � O O O O W) o vi o v N f`7 coIL1 t to !A EA to g a CL CL 0 O 9 E U 4 g v 0 ° o o O (n d -Y O E c w m CD - m o is a i d O U lU o 0 G N N : t t u w O LL m m m '6 y U C m o 0 0 2 0 1 EcL) z ii c V) Z Z V) y V) C 0 U o V LL a a CL CL 0 0 0 fA 0 0 0 0 m CA W /A O 0 O 2 CA V3 O o Lo 0 N cc to o co m ta to t0 o c n c U) ° L c i m o r Cca 1 m m CL o N > C a J O LO cD C7 to O C O U v 0 C m O LL CD d c w m CD U c V d N d fn U) v V U 1 C o IL y ° rn y a 3 EcL) z E 0 U 0 0 0 fA 0 0 0 0 m CA W /A O 0 O 2 CA V3 O o Lo 0 N cc to o co m ta to t0 o c n c U) ° L c i m o r Cca 1 m m CL o N > C a J O LO cD C7 to U O.0 13- �, a. C O O a) C `~ fu O 00-0 4E O _ -O C C d Z3 (6 C U U N O r O �+ N m E O N � UL O O O O O O O O O O O 1+ p = O O O O N O O O O h O O O �l] M O c0 O O O SCJ t0 O M O O m N c0 O O r m O < C O M O) M O O v N -0m CJ � N fA 6N4 fA E4 K! fA yg fR 64 O O O O O w O O p O O O O O O M O co tR 69 V! M O coV f - CD N (19 FY2007-2008 Agency Funding Requests Health and Human Service Agencies FY06 FY07 FY08 Agency Name Adopted Adopted Request FY2008 Proposed YWCA of the Roanoke Valley $p $0 $15,00 $90 YMCA -Partners of Youth $1,500 $1,500 $2,50 $1,90 TRUST $4,800 $4,900 $7,50 $4,90 TAP -Transitional Living Center $20,000 $19,400 $21,00 $19,70 TAP $29,700 $29,400 $31,00 $29,60 Southwestern Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank $4,500 $4,900 $10,00 $5,20 Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp $0 _ $0 $2,50 $ Salvation Army $2,500 $2,400 $4,OD _ $2,60 Salem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry - Operating $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,50 Saint Francis of Assisi Service bog Foundation $2,500 $2,700 $25,00 $3,00 Roanoke Wildlife Rescue $0 $7DO $2,50 $80 Roanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center $1,200~^^$1,600 $2,50C $1,80 Roanoke Valley Interfaith Hospitality Network $0 $900 $8,50 $1,10 Roanoke Area Ministries $1,200 $1,400 $5,000 $1,50 Presbyterian Community Center - - National Multiple Sclerosis Society $200 $200 $200 _. $200 $1,00 _ _.._ -- -------- $1,50 i $40 _.._._ $40 Mental Health America of Roanoke Valley (Formerly known as Mental Health Association) $700 $80D $1,500 $1,00 LOA Area Agency on Aging $15,000 $15,400 $32,349 $15,701 Literacy Volunteers of Roanoke Valley Habitat for Humanity -Property DonationO`__ _.._......_..._.__......__..._.. _._..._.... .... __..... ...... -_................. .... ..... ............_.._........._....__..._.._..._----.._.__..._.._......_.._........_._.........._.............--_.... Habitat for Humanity - Cash Donation _ $1,000 $1,900 $1,000 O,_�______��_� ----_._._--_.._..--,....._...._....._.....-._-_._..__....___.__... $1,900 $2,DOO $5,000 $1,10 __....__.._..._......__._.. $2,10 Goodwill Industries of the Valleys �Y $1,900 $1,700 $5,ODO $1,20 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley $4,300 $4,300 $8,00 $4,40 Family'Service of�the Roanoke Valley -Roanoke County Prevention��' Council ___.__.__....__ $0 _...._.._..._._ $0 $4,OOC $1,00 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) $2,900 $2,500 $15,00 $3,60 Council of Community Svcs - Nonprofit Resource Center Council of Community Svcs - Info and Referral Center y $0 $3,000 $0 ..._ _.. $3,000 $5,00 $3,300 _ $ _.___.._..._...._ $3,10 Conflict Resolution Center, Inc. $1,400 $1,200 $7,50 $1,40 Commonwealth Search and Rescue (Daleville) $0 $100` $1,00 $20 Commonwealth Catholic Charities (NEW) Children's Advocacy Center of the Roanoke Valley, Inc Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) Camp Virginia Jaycee, Inc. E _....... __ ..._ ..._.__...______._.. _ _ _. _ - Brain Injury Services ofSWVA i .___ _.._ _..._ . ___. __.._.. _ i $0 m._ $3,500 $18,700 $0 $1,500 .__ _ $0 $3,5D0� $19,100 $500 $1,500 i _ $2,00 $7,500 $25,000 $1,19 $14,822 _ ___ $40 $3,90 $19,90 $60 $1,60 10 FY2007-2008 Agency Funding Requests Health and Human Service Agencies FY06 FY07 FY08 Agency Name Adopted Adopted Request FY2008 Proposed Bradley Free Clinic $5,200 $5,200 $7,000 $5,60 Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia $0 $400 $24,50 $70 Blue Ridge Legal Services, Inc. $0 $0 $3,73 $ Blue Ridge Independent Living Center $0 $400 $10,00 $70 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley Bethany Hall $4,000 $1,000 $4,200 $1,000__ $5,50C $6,12 $4,50 T ^ l $1,70 American Red Cross $1,300 $5,000 $5,000 $4,20 Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley $10,400 $10,300 $12,000 $10,50 Sub -Total $151,000 $158,200 $363,514 $168,400 Board Discussion: Contractual Relationship for Services: Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare 1 $119,6001 $130,0001 $211,58 $157,00 Grand Total Health & Human Services $270,600 $288,200 $575,102 $325,400 FY2007-2008 Agency Funding Requests Cultural, Tourism and Other Agencies FY06 FY07 FY08 Agency Name Adopted Adopted Request FY2008 Proposed Young Audiences of Virginia, Inc. $900 $1,100 $1,800 $1,100 Williamson Road Area Business Association $1,000 $1,000 $10,000 $1,000 Westem Virginia Land Trust $1,200 $1,900 $10,000 $2,20 Virginia Museum of Transportation $5,700 $6,000 $15,000 $6,400 Virginia Amateur Sports $42,400 $44,400 $50,DDC $45,500 Vinton Dogwood Festival $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Vinton Chamber of Commerce - Business Recruitment $3,000 $3,000 $10,000 $3,900 Tri -County Lake Administrative Commission (TLAC) Smith Mtn Lake $10,000 $9,400 $10,000 $9,000 Small Business Development Center $3,500 $3,500 $5,000 $3,500 Science Museum of Western Virginia - Operating $16,400 $17,000 $20,000 $17,900 Science Museum of Western Virginia - NEW Capital Request $0 $0 $25,000 $ Salem -Roanoke Baseball Hall of Fame $2,800 $2,600 $3,000 $2,800 Roanoke Valley Sister Cities $2,7001 $2,400 $2,400 $2,300 Roanoke Symphony $6,400 $6,400 $25,000 $6,500 Roanoke Higher Education Center $10,000 $10,700 $20,000 $11,000 Opera Roanoke $600 $600 $5,50 $70 New Century Venture Center $900 $1,000 $10,000 $1,100 Mill Mountain Zoo - Capital Request $700 $900 $100,D00 $1,200 Mill Mountain Zoo $6,700 $7,000 $20,000 $8,90 Mill Mountain Theatre $5,500 $6,400 $15,000 $6,700 Jefferson Center Foundation $1,100 $1,200 $10,000 $1,500 History Museum & Historical Society of Western Va. $7,700 $8,40D $12,000 $8,700 History Museum & Historial Society of Western Va - Capital (NEW) $0 $0 $30,000 $0 History Museim & Historical Society of Western Va - O. Winston Link Museum $2,000 $2,900 $6,000 $3,600 Harrison Museum of African American Culture $2,000 $1,900 $1 O,ODO $1,700 Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway Downtown Music Lab Clean Valley Council, Inc $9,200 $10,000 $15,000 $10,400 $900 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $12,000 $4,000 $1,400 $1,400 Center in the Square Operating $37,700 $37,700 $75,000 $39,600 Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District Arts Council of the Blue Ridge $1,500 $1,200 $3,000 $1,200 $2,5001 $2,700 $5,000 $2,900 Sub -Total $187,800 $194,500 $540,700 $205,100 12 FY2007-2008 Agency Funding Requests Cultural, Tourism and Other Agencies Agency Name Dues & Per FY06 FY07 FY08 I FY2008 Adopted Adopted Request Proposed $1 $160,70 $57,21 NattonalAssoc+at+on of Cunftes „fi96 $�81 '$ 7$1 $1,781 Economic Development Partnership $140,054 $14x,732 $170,291 $160,000 Sub -Total $365,488 $387,785 $450,927 $433,169 Board Discussion: Greenway Commission 1 $17,4001 $29,600 $30,20 $30,200 Grand Total Cultural, Tourism & Other $570,688 $611,885 $1,021,8271 $668, FY2007 - 2008 Additional Department Funding Requests (Unfunded) Summary Human Services Elections 31,834 Library 115,450 Parks and Recreation Recreation 57,681 Grounds Maintenance 137,300 Social Services 74,011 Human Services Totals $ 416,276 Community Services Community Development 335,043 General Services 435,147 Community Services Totals $ 770,190 Constitutional Officers Commissioner of the Revenue 78,875 Sheriff 667,611 Commonwealth Attorney 36,833 Constitutional Officers Totals $ 783,319 General Administration Human Resources 21,000 General Administration Totals $ 21,000 Judicial Services General District Court 13,278 Judicial Services Totals $ 13,278 Management Services Public Transportation 140,000 Management Services Totals $ 140,000 Internal Services Information Technology 223,175 Internal Service Totals $ 223,175 Public Safety Fire and Rescue $ 1,501,242 Police 258,200 Public Safety Totals $ 1,759,442 Total $ 4,126,680 14 1- 9t O O O O O O Q r O r O O O O O O O r O N r W M LD O O O O O 0 O co O O O O O O O M c N O N CC O _ O .-^M cc w ;D O lC� O O CD r O M N -Ili V' N O w h w 1� 00 r- M fn M .. O� CO r 69 m c y x N Z :°a COU Q > p z C d Z w N y U Z y L ` 4, a) U) to N _� C. ; C > a a7 CQ N a7 O -p U U C N N N m 0 U 0 43 4)O m c se o m ti S m 3 c c Z c N ad `° o o 3 cm C Oo d N Ql N = U C O N LE O ~ C V •UN�)! m C 'C W m O d oa y ta roU OC �oc a 41 O C N s n t p C u m y C G) E 3 m CD m v, o C N O a) _ !� C .cclC V = l3 a) O C a m LL w N O O v1 a O y a) C 3 r C C a) O ` o V C tw N �-. N c O _ O w O E rn d Q _ y -p p U O Z 2 m c [a N U Y ' a = m c7 V co C E N a C Q i m rn w>> io W L' v v mo a ai u c m aUi o o- o J> •v o CM c CL CL o a� c rn w M m 0 V o W c m •�, m m :° y 9 m c� o w `m a N ro a m `m c w m > `U CD m m o E' ` in v' i � 5 m ani a`� Q i 0) a F- CL CLOOOOO CLO CL O D U U U CL IL F d) m CL U O v N Q O c`c m Q o W U a� L U y to y o O a) c° N �c A -O C a O m a7 _N N CY 5 O C y C Y L N a) C Q 'O °� N = w C W a) 'O L CD d t0 U C Q dcu M O n �p E «• Y FA U .a '� rn m _ a E � m n rn Q J a) J a) p LL a) O U O O F- r io r ' N U CO W J U C C o m ,.= C m � ro y U 0 0 U N N -0 Y co O C7 p W J I 0- 15 C C N N d 7 Q O w c W C O ea Q. O is C V Q co Cl O N ti Co Cl N N Z G1 N E 7 E O U 16 M O O O O O O O Of t-- O M r R Oh O O O O O O O O 0 1- Q CD c OOqItOp et p� 11) O O O O O O O u> O O R M M p O O W O w m m O O r r Y N O c7 M t- In N LO fo m (a lq I, N 1` I OO 00 O ti r r N It 'd' 1n h N '- tl R r M Cl) N N 1� fR K: d: c CD a E o Z c > o v E v O C_ y m C 0- E C _ o y C o L Q N U cp N c ami cm E m rte. O c .T oin m a� irs E U m V1 m N c O o 0 t/i cm CGi �. � c> C O R 0.- 0 L m cd U T c f0 C C .L� .. y E Q (� (n U C '� c A vj �. to O' F' U) n C L 3 c as (D a d ca m v o U d d C (b LL C cn C 'C d •C N N N V C c 0 o c O ca ro r o w-0 'o2 C c o .m N L NT c A Q CD m rn m0 •� ¢ co N 7 Cb ° 'r a� m m c aci v .c rn M'0 - n z R C' --cow E '� N _ o O y y c 'w c .O c 'w c 'a CL 4 m ,n U Q) U O C V a? m m o W ti O m n cm d w 'E fn cn U m > to m iB U = — m E o m c m m U' m m m m o o o F- O i— L F- a i- a Q Z Z C C C C 0 f-- In I- LL 0 Q U 0 a O O O O O O O a s a O 0. a_ U O L � C C E Q w O C _ CL v C C O C N y m O G 0 cc Z3 -0 N j p o C 0 c m W Q U' > ca U fn N U otS = c ot3 u _ c E o �_' rn ` C) W d c c N m y 0 CD ac CD«? 0 4 m CO > > Cc >Uc -0 Cc UCIS C -9 A._ C C N N a Lij F- ! O Q W U' H C_ IL F- U U C U' C C � O O E U O m w z U Djz- com q _ N co C� CO E F`- m U O N U C7 16 R C 4- C Cr 4) LiY C LL C N 1✓ R Q d 0 c 0 W� Q co Q N ti O O N U. � 0 0 o o o w O O h M O O O O r r m O m to ti O O m 0 O -�T O O r " M o m r t0 O O O N O W N N to V) O N O C> 't to 0: C co m ,�i C v Co- O 00 MM O tl L C r' t`— tD C co r7 � �- � tt u � O to co r! 00 N [') O tD f• N N 0 rn m 0 c c O U O N E E O 7 ND to ' L C L lS lS cc a 3v c CDE a) (D o rn rn O -0c o (aU (aO c c e0 O `.Kco H to C j C 3 C N � L N a) O t1 O C. F c t v, o d u� U is .N L d L tH L N E c° E c ° o m cu m y L o E o U m c O C_ � c E E _ (0 t0 O U N .. N _� N N 3 -0 cc L Cm mCMt0 d N y c0 m C O rn rn w Cl) O O m 0 O R m O > > co O c ° O c '~ a� aa) rn a� o o a co u, E ,� c o o >> O C_ m a E w :� N m c U a ca o , 0) ch m CL y > C_ 6 C N w3- N @ O C U U c cm (CD O U EW O U d d C a7 O C ) d a > COaC Umco tD N3C N3 RN CCHOi y _UE MMOU N E E 0 F O O {n c z 2 H U zc F- U H O 4- a 0 0 0 U U O a a a 0 0 0 a r L C H N O O @_ Q L N N � Cl) O E y N E O U d a) - O O ` > E E = d r r° oo CO a 0 a �' �' cn N E dtn Uc c N c E C. q 0 m L U fnn M K v rn (A 0 0 J d 0 Z) N 7 C � c a� � E LZ 0 0 U � a c a c N 10 O E _>co C E m U U cu w U 17 A S Cl 8 # k E 2 } � /0 0 w -D & � k ƒ £ o . § k k k ca o 0 -13 \ ) k CL a 2 O 7 / k V) ƒ k I C) N Lo r- � # § b ƒ 2 0 ` o ° k � \ k tCD 2 CL M k 0 � . 0 0 � \ 0 0 \ > & § k o R R \ 0 o O U) . 7 I E : \ 0 / S / \ U- 0 0 U \ \ f / 44 18 \ \ N § k CL / < 0 _ cc 2 E o 0 m k > ■ 0 co 0 ■ o 0 / _ ( / m m 0 e 2 w \ E cc k E 0 2 0 } 7 2 ƒ a = I 3 @ 2 � \ _ § k % ƒ \ _ E / [ / 0 7 A \ \ � % E / F 19 N O OSO O O O OOO OO O pN— d- O) N N O�OO v O O O N O O O O O O O — O O N O N N l to to O) m m O Ln c O V O C'7 O W LC) C O O O N O� r. O co O (0 M N to Lo r ti t` r r r r- r N N O O O O Ip ID N r co r C`7 '" AD`'". r N V.- 641). 641). 649- C W C � O w O C O O a CL OV N n a a W 'V c pj y W O 0. m c W c o, t E c d ;o E V CL V U 3 W > m y W W a d W m E [1 0 v U LL C y O 'd 7 c N Y c O td w C c` rn o m n E w a 0 ami >W. d p N C E G y ci. 'O O L N W O 7 t C v co W O d? ? O V W C O C O W E y cr W t m Q3 LL CL C5 U) d U O C a 3 V Ui L L 3 W U C_ V L m m W W p > m W rn w rn w Z N O C C 7 X X- N a m m M m a U ._� O 'C w y W U V ll lL V ..- O U cm W W C a a d V C W W E W 'a m O) C� V p C N t9 of L N L C V O CM a Q O CoWpcD @ m w h W C C N m d N W m c m m p C c m C C H rn W m C U m m L m a' E E Cocu .L) o -a 0 m m m T en a a O a t6 .r `m d �' m a 0 5 m o 2 m ° p (.30 CL a- D U a-Q� U 2 WL.L in in a ii E a CLCLa a a a 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U cc c : 0 o c m O a 0 N 0 C N N cm O Q CD C c t in O w y U d W n Co a d a co fn rn m cCL a m •- C W a c d OL a o a) C U Cf)w N O E u- to c U S O O O O 0 - O U O W N N p V m to (D 0� n 0 � �. a s m V) a� W � n rn c m c O 7 tF 0° W W � m W W V ° (n U ` O »fl t�o CY6 a W C c m W W a m m = _ 7 m W p en y N En V) C y V C c f0 C = U C C U ~ c Q N W C W C }- O O p O O 7 '7 m N O O y N N N J ILh= O fn F- 7 d m (i h H U > F- W 4 W O z W U W W C cu W 2 U_ IL O a 19 20 m C a C C Q O N N O N N c CU 0 U > N V � C m o 'o Oa > p 0 _ c N m E m C O. ¢ N a CM y C f_n v C o E m Q — E C7 C �. 0. Nc c @ m N .FCh U 0 O U O N m a� m C °- a >_ o c -CLEn m 4CD" MW C �% NNm 7 .r Q-' N m N O y C C m O U N id N C 7 N w a N C 0 �p N m O N U _ N C Cn Y w m y GO CL l0 U f6 y O L O -O ~ m m N 3 _ 1p ^ $, Li v> m a s a C N o E �° c p @ O' O! O N 0, N O 'D C C C 41 O ° C p LL C N G o m o 0 0. U o o N E v c C 7 m = r2 CT U p _� m Y -'i N m @ +0. .0 m N v C C Ol CA C .� a C j f6 = m Ol w C m u -6Y ` d d cc 16 55 an d C m (0 C U N tm O N N U N W C CA a N y y O-0 O C p N C 04 N N C C W C G N E N m C m y > C rtN+ O > CoN C N m 7 7 O O j O -O ." m in > O Co O U E-0 CL L _V L s- G d OL O T N Ol U N C N C U L 6 F- Q F- F- F- N N U Q U D F- F- U F- F- a) Q. +� LO N O) r r CDCO v co 00 NU') co N 7 CO W) r O N M It MV) Cl CO h (D CO M tD co C n.. (D N O M co V m N N v O 00 N O M W u•) u•) O O ; 0 7 LD to to a0 c0 t0 O (D c0 CO t0 T fD O .4 O U7 r N Cl) r LO M O 0 to to T r N r M N r O o: 0 0 d w M a O O o. < 0 Q co UD O r V � CO r N LO I- N M O 1- CO co O I-- O CO M co N V 7 co M O IT M In (O CJ Cl) CO w WL c0 O M f0 lll� C� N N V O ac N 0 M to IQ O ....: C. .N. .4; LO CO .- O) CO gU, O to M V co m O O n LO V) M h t0 M CO � V)W) h N �D (O CD I r N v Oa r N U II LL Q. M ED r r N r r M.- N +-- O r N N N C N O/ GCD _ m N C m N N C C C w w U O O 0c C C y C N N V T L ` d > C �� d L!' p 0 E C7l C C' L L �+ - U O O IL W a _� o� c c° N •� N ° �_ U U O C N N N 41 U N L O m ca LG_ d — m C O d .7 LL LL C U V% O _ N tp t%i 'N U C N N E C m_ w (� (� (J 7 O D .Z C F- U G w d N E L L Y 0 II C m C C C ¢ Z` to CA m N = C O c N m 0 0 Q UJ C N E E N o m N V E O E 9 p m> T N U c N C C c N v m m G• E E o :9 a m E t `� @> v a a E E c ° y m m m m o ' c E o - .0 W m m o d `m E F- E W Q F- U Q y a a F- 2 U o U 1 Y D p U 0 U m Lu .. LL d (9 "E 5 1 d N 20 2 k ± � 2 0 cr Q � § k IL 5 § _0 J 0 0 h ¥ L ■\ 21 CD § 4>� R Cl) � k k :»f ) a to ! © e \» a 0 . k Lo � � \ w & , £ 5 r 2J D ® # E LL 4 is m / / 2§ � \ ƒ � we •# k CD 0 of � C. , $ B \ R # .. R k Q co _ \ ? q >d\ 2�§ \ . _ k � »\E / § E k o 7 2 ; § �w-1 e §w $ w ■\ 21