The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/22/2007 - Regular Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda May 22, 2007 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for May 22, 2007. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturdays at 4:00 p.m. The meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Pastor Greg Huffman Shenandoah Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of May 20 through 26, 2007, as Emergency Medical Services Week in the County of Roanoke D. BRIEFINGS 1 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Confirmation of the approved list of revenue sharing projects for fiscal year 2006-2007 and fiscal year 2007-2008 and designation of $500,000 for road improvements on Merriman Road. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 35.21 acres from 1-2, Industrial District, to AG-3, AgriculturallRural Preserve District for the construction of a single family dwelling, located at 5242 Beason Lane, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Timothy and Rhonda Coleman. 2. First reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 28.71 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-2, General Commercial District, to construct a public library, and to obtain a Special Use Permit in order to allow a drive-in restaurant within the public library, located at 5690 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Library Services and Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 3. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a family day care home on 0.22 acre, located at 2627 Creekwood Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of LaSonja McKinstry. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the reservation and dedication of a public greenway easement associated with the Green Hill Park segment of the Roanoke River Greenway through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Green Hill Park, Catawba Magisterial District. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) 2. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to the Western Virginia Water Authority and the creation of a new drainage easement through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Walrond Park, Hollins Magisterial District. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) 2 I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (Appointed by District) 2. Cable Television Committee - Roanoke County 3. Cable Television Committee - Roanoke Valley Regional 4. Clean Valley Council 5. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) 6. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District) 7. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 8. Virginia Western Community College Board 9. Western Virginia Water Authority J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes - May 8, 2007 2. Resolution establishing salaries for the County Administrator and County Attorney. 3. Request to authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement with ITT to repair and replace damage to storm sewer facilities. 4. Request to accept and appropriate grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Forestry. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 3 N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Accounts Paid - April 2007 5. Statement of expenditures and estimated and actual revenues for the month ended April 30, 2007 6. Public Safety Center Building Project Budget Report 7. Public Safety Center Building Project Change Order Report O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (1) discussion and consideration of appointments of prospective candidates to the Western Virginia Water Authority and the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. P. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room - 4th floor) 1. Work session to discuss stormwater management ordinance and design standards. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development and Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development) 2. Work session on County Capital Improvements Plan Projects. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Certificate of recognition to Roanoke County Schools for being selected as one of the Best 100 Communities for Music Education in America in 2007. 2. Certificates of recognition to the All-State Band and Choir Winners. 3. Resolution of congratulations to students at A. R. Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkillsUSA and Future Business Leaders of America, Inc. (FBLA) awards. 4 4. Resolution of congratulations to the Glenvar High School wrestling team for winning the State Group A Championship. (a) Certificate of recognition to Jeremy Mowles, for winning the State Championship at 135-Pounds. (b) Certificate of recognition to Aaron Blomberg, for winning the State Championship at 145-Pounds. (c) Certificate of recognition to Ben Jamison, for winning the State Championship at 189-Pounds. 5. Certificate of recognition to Julia Koff, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the State Group AA Diving Championship 6. Resolution of congratulations to the Hidden Valley Girls Basketball Team for winning the State Group AA Championship. (a) Certificate of recognition to Abby Oliver for being named First Team All- State, Associated Press First Team All-State, and AII-Timesland First Team. (b) Certificate of recognition to Abby Redick for being named Associated Press First Team All-State and AII-Timesland First Team. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCE 1. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment on 0.9 acres, located at 2132 River Oaks Drive, upon the petition of Ted Alan Leneave, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 2. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 0.369 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-1, Office District, with Conditions, for the operation of a beauty salon, located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, upon the petition of Richard and Judy Wagner, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 3. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 0.844 acres from C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to C-2, General Commercial District, to remove proffered conditions on property located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, upon the petition of Jatin Patel, Hollins Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 5 4. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology District, and to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, at the Center for Research and Technology (CRT), located near the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 5. Second reading of an ordinance to increase the salaries of the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 15.2-1414.3 of the Code of Virginia. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 1. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Michael W. Altizer 2. Richard C. Flora 3. Michael A. Wray 4. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 5. Joseph P. McNamara V. ADJOURNMENT 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C-l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 Proclamation declaring the week of May 20 through 26, 2007, as Emergency Medical Services Week in the County of Roanoke ElmerC.Hodge ~ ~~r County Administrator AGENDA ITEM: APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department is requesting that the Board adopt the attached proclamation declaring the week of May 20 through 26, 2007, as Emergency Medical Services Week. Emergency Medical Services Week brings together local communities and medical personnel to publicize safety and honor the dedication of those who provide the day-to-day lifesaving services of medicine's "front line." Present to accept the proclamation will be Fire and Rescue Chief Rick Burch and EMS Battalion Chief Dustin Campbell. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF MAY 20 THROUGH 26, 2007, AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, emergency medical services are a vital public service; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators and others; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week. NOW, THEREFORE, WE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of May 20 through 26, 2007, as EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK in the County of Roanoke; and FURTHER, we encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that reflect the theme for this year "Extraordinary People, Extraordinary Service", 2 ACTION NO, ITEM NO. E -I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of the Approved List of Revenue Sharing Projects for FY 2006-2007 and FY 2007-2008 and Designation of $500,000 for Road Improvements on Merriman Road SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development Elmer C. Hodge ('/~----/ I{-;..~/ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: o /) .,y-;'~ '<-':hJ~ J L \u<.;{rhVrl....oI:.-"'F~V (0 'cr .- SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On January 24,2006, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisor's approved the priority list for the FY 2006-2007 Revenue Sharing Program and authorized the County Administrator to sign the Letter of Intent to participate in the FY 2006-2007 Revenue Sharing Program. On December 4, 2006, Roanoke County submitted to VDOT its official letter of intent to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2006-2007. The letter stated that Roanoke County would provide $1,001,000 forthis program, to be matched on a dollar-for- dollar basis up to $1 million by the State of Virginia. This level of commitment qualifies the County for Tier 1 funding. Attached is a list of the 25 projects submitted to VDOT totaling $2,001,000. As a result of the transportation actions by the Governor and the 2007 General Assembly, additional funding has been made available to the Revenue Sharing Program so that for FY 2008 and each year thereafter, the Commonwealth Transportation Board will be able to fully fund the program at $50 million state-wide. In order to achieve that funding level, the Commonwealth Transportation Board combined the State funding appropriated to the program in FY 2006-2007 with that provided for FY 2007-2008. Roanoke County is eligible to receive up to $1 million from the State as a dollar for dollar match for this combined time frame. In effect, we lost one year of revenue sharing match from the State. The current application the County submitted to VDOT on December 4, 2006 will still be honored. It was the consensus of the Board at the May 8, 2007 work session, to leave the revenue sharing plan as previously adopted; using the $1 million budgeted in the 2006-07 County revenue sharing budget for the County match. In addition, the Board concurred to use the $500,000 appropriated for Revenue Sharing in the 2007 -2008 County budget for road improvements on Merriman Road at the new South County Library. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriations of funds are needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. Confirm the FY 2006-2007 Revenue Sharing Project List, totaling $2,001,000, which has previously been submitted to VD01. 2. Confirm the use of the $500,000 included in the 2007-2008 County Revenue Sharing Budget for the road improvements on Merriman Road at the new South County Library \.0 mo r.<. o ;Z; .-~ W C)~ < < .J..,~ ~o o~ r.<.~<c ~~> 5 r/.l ;; ~~f-o ~ ~ 5 o ~ 0 Z>u ~ ~ ~ <t'--o z~ Z 0\.0< Ci)Oo ~G:~ ~~ u..:l~ ~~ r/.lr/.l >- ;..:U ~ iii 0<: 0 b;<n Q~ E.... c ~f? ~~ .~ ~ -€ -.r.: ~ ~ ~ c':; ~ (j tl ~ ::~ ~~~ ..., ~~ ~-.r.:<"':' ~;:-,. ~> ~~ ~ ~ :..: ~~ ~ (;l '"'" .::: -.~ ~"=' ... - - ~~..::. '"-l ~..:> ... l:: ~ .~"1:::l"::::"" <::0 {l ~ -..; ct::~~ ~~c ::: a .~ c .... .....~ '()Cl.,c,,'" ~~ I:: .. ~ tIi~- Q":::: - 0,) Q~w a~"-'- ~ " -g~~ <::0 ~ '" ~~~ b ~ .~ "E III => c:n :61:- ~m ~u <l) QJ U c "S o .r:. III c QJ '0 ~ >- z o o ...... -.f "<:l :0 "!;C (lj ~ E~ ~c. 1619 ~.~ =:I...... u =:I .. c. 15t::' "" QJ a:1a2 ~a 1J s C QJ '0 ~ b Cl > <~ ?Ee :il~ ..c u ~< ;::;~ ~ => >~ 12'0 ~~ ~E ro~ ..co ~u m>. ~~ If ~ c: .... III ~ 0:0 >- z o f'") .... b Cl > QJ 19 lJ'l ..!. o U <;; QJ ......~ roc 'Om cc =>QJ et: 'Pro EE .a ...... u E III C o U >- z o lJ'l b Cl > >- z o ro .... b Cl > <- ::E: :I: :0 .r:. u .S ~ > III "C '1) :> o .... iU .r:. 0- III III )( E i: m c:: <l) 19 VJ ..!. o U c <l) ......'1) m~ g~ ec ~ rc E E .a u E III C o U >- z o CD .... b Cl > 8 > b Cl > ~ffi>-. rnOJ- v,u~ L ~.. tII .BQJO 1U~c. OJ=>- a,uJ!l_ c .- ~~QJ~ .e:eE-e 3:V~rn g~ea rn 5. a. ...... o c.E'C .......m-@ ~~Q;~ o ..c :g QJ 1ii3:5 '1)'1).r:. "<:lull} ~cOJ Cl 19 c: ~~:;l >- z o <D CD ~~...... "'r--.,o.._ a >-g...... -etLi..c. ..L~ ~Cl~~~~liB~~E::E:1JB~~ffiE~1JB::E:9ffi :.:: QJ ~ ro li'" .... Ui ~ 19 .:B 0 :il ~ 0 ' 'C E 0 0 ~ -vi 'C E Ell} w roUli:!V)a:'-Cl _co'Oc '-.b _co.c roEo_~~wow ~~o~ro~~~~~~~~~ e6~"""u~zbc~"O 0 ....~~19 ~~<Dw~19 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..c:: .E ~~- ~~55 E~~B~~~o~Eoo~~~~~ o5~m~o~~~~~~E~~~~ ~~'O""~E~~~o~~~~~S~ ~ ~ \D W e = -c .s = 't:l ...... ,- u.. L~ La:.5;: co ci >- .... g vi' N o o o ",' N Q\ S...... ::;:ID QJ ""'.... u~ =:I _ III '0 a: t;f~ 5...... ~~ III C >- N o o o o N o o o o N ,." .... ci >- f'") co .-i .... ...' co .-i .... ...' sg:: ....1'1 OJ.... iEllJ '1)...... --'~ -oll'l a: " '0" ~E ~a: III C >- ... o o o .n N o o o .n N .., ci >- '" o N ~ ......' o N ~ ......- -0 a:lJ'l ...... '0...... .ffiE ~~ ~ ~ :I: '" QJ .r:. u .S N > III ~ :> o ...... Iii .r:. 0. III m )( ~ c: ro 0: >- >- z z o ... .... o ... .... ~ c: In ... ci >- >- <D ...... o o C> Lri" N N ~ f'") " C> C> o vi' N N O"l .., ......' .... c'" ro" Ej!l ~~ :I:-o 0:: .... clD m...... :E2 =:I~ :c .",- 0:: .... d >- m o Cl Cl 0' N g o o N ... -eN OlD c.QJ 3:...... (lj~ Z '0- 0:: -ti"Ul ~co >\0 ~1J OJ~ :.:: b Cl > OJ U c 19 '" '0 ...... .r:. rn in QJ > o .... Q. ~ B '1) 0.. o ""in Il.J '0 ~ Cl &, ~ >- z o o o ...' ~ c >- '" C> o o .n N 00 IT) .., ...... ~~ LI"l Ul .... .... o o o .n N C> 0 .., f'") "" ... '" m UlUl .... .... 1S:6 ~~ :J . Ul E ::J U \0 M 0 w.. . o Z 01< .-. u.i t.Ll o f-. < < l.;Q ~ 0 o 6 w.. ~ ~<l;-< zgj> ::>wr: r.:..~z w.. Z ::> o t.Ll 0 z>u ~ ~ ~ <l"-o Z S2 z g \0 < Ul 0 0 C5G::~ ;2~ ~~ ~~ <ZlU) >- [) ~ t.Ll C2 Q t; rii Ci~ E... C ~G> ~~ .:u .~ :; -i; "'l: .;.: '- ~ ~ ct ~ c.i ~ q ~ ~l>, '"''-~ '" :5:::.:; ~"'l:'- ....:::"'\ ~? ';:: ~ cq <....:.. ~ ~ I- o Cl > Q) u I: 19 IJ1 '6 ... .r: Cl 'Vi III > o c. ,5 .8 Q) 0. o Vi Q) ~ l!! 01 cL c::: >- z <:> co co b Cl > II:!' QJ "0 '3 o 1iii;1 01 .r: I: '-' :c~ ~"t:l ClOl c: ~~ QJ= enD roB !: ifl ~ ' "C~ QJ > E? 0. oS >- z <:> o o ",,- b Cl > <' ~ :r. ~ .r: u ,5 ~ >- '" 11 > o '-' n; .r: 51- III X E ~ I: ro c: >- z <:> o o N b Cl > ....r: Q) U en'" ... E? .!!!o. fil6- '~~ t:o QJ:;: >' "5~Qj '-'"0 I: XC:I: o 10 Itl D<1J.r: en"''-' :aB !!IE ilj", QJ III '-'0> ~~ QJ~ ~'C >- >- o o lD :.: ~ ,~ - t:s '-' <:> '"-l ;;; I: QJ ...' II:! _ o~' I!! , 0 - ;;;:>.- ~~~bo~~~~o~E~~~~~~~ ID ,-,~.",Lf1W "'Q)'<I"OJ "'0 \0' '<I'" Q)QJ UI:M~~~-~~~~oC ~t:'<I'".r:~ ~~E~~2g~:~2g~:~~~~~~~ is:;: ~c:::~u~uc:::~u~ ~ a Cl .::: ~~ 'Eo ~ :t~~ '"-l ~~~ .~ 1l ,.. ;i;; '-"t::;;~ ~ :: ;t. ~ >i;~rS .t- ::: <!, ::.. ....., .!:! "i:: ..-:r 'CCl...Cl.;'- ~.::: 'S~w ~~~ 0'::: - '-' :::...~ ~..;; '",;. u~ "t:: ~" t:s",'Il> Q :::: ~ e:: - ..... ~~ 10 c- >- ;:: <:> o o vi" "" o o o ui" N ""00 C:::Lf1 c:'" OQJ II:!'-' aC::: " " ci >- ~ ~ o o o 0' N o <:> o o N ",' C:::lD Q)"" I:lD .!E~ .~ 0:: F '" r-: o >- "" ~ '<I" en M ~- N '<I" en M '<1'" N 'C. C:::lD QJN I:lD IOQJ "t:'" ._~ F III ..... c: >- M ~ o <:> Ln ,,' M o o Lf1 ...: M ~~ OJlO .r: QJ g'~ III ' Cl"C c::: b Cl > OJ Cl III I: iii -6.I!J ... c: .EQJ OlE I: QJ .- > '00 I: ... .20. QJ 5 :> c: :0 I: 8 >- z <:> o Ol ~' 6111 "0 E~o6-I B ~ I;) 19 c::: ,. tt c 00'" ~ ~ .!EC::r-tQJ 0. '" ro c- >- ~ ...... o o o vi" o o <:> vi" 0. ~~ln "'C:::0l I: _ co .~5~ u. b Cl > <' ~ :l: l3 .r: u .!: ~ >- 10 1:: QJ > o ... n; .r: 0. IJ1 ro >< Z I: III c: >- z o Lf1 N M~ Effi~g~ EQ)EC:::~ o E ~ OJ OJ- 0 U:QJ :t:>"" ~ ii' .8 <t u: ~ >- Lf1 ~ o ~ N '<l'" o '<I'" N N '<l'" S'Ln ....~ .r:lD g'E ,ac::: Ul >< E ... ~<' o.~ ~...:c .!!ill) C III ,- .c 'C u C c: '" .- ~~ c.'" - ro 0.0 OJ ... Cl:! III Itl C.r: i!!lil- '0'" '0 III QJ Z , '0 ii"':S E :>.-;2;", O~"""'1O LL:~2~ ~c:::o ... ~BN 'Oc:::'" 8 .M ~o'" b o > ... C QJ E Q) > '" 0. 'OQJ Cel '" ro ... I: ~e :>'" OlQJ a!I> .aE! ::.~ u- ~.8 E 19 ~ ID ~ >- z o o M 5 ~~ "p. OlD ili -5 e.... \!!.;;::.g .& OJ IX C l5l... - 0 N N ci >- oD ~ lD ~ '" ...- ... lD ~ "'- ... .... ;:)0 C:::Ln ...oD 1IJ~ ~2 ~~ b o > >- z o V M 10 ..... C >- '" ~ o o o o~ N o C> Lf1 co " ... LI1L11 co '<l'" ~M o <:> o ~ 00 lJ"l co " ~ lfilfl CO'<l'" ~M ~}9 ~~ ;> , UlE ::l u \0 ("") 0 u.. o Z M~ ti.i w Of-< ~ <f; l..,Q ~ 0 O~ tJ...~..... cr.J~"'<, Cl:r:> 5 lZl .. ~gs~ tJ... Z 5 OWO Z>u ~ ~ ~ ZO 0 0....... Z - 01.0 ~ cr.J 0 ~t;:~ ~~ ~w ......1....:l -<-< C/)C/J >.: ;-. u ~ffi g:9 cr.J cr.J C)~ ~ c ~~ ~:: ~a ~~ a -i: ""l: ~ ~ g. ~ ~ ,.; ~ ~ :::~ ~c~ .., ~:,.,; ~""l:r...;. '" ~>' ~~ i:q'- ~ ~ 5 o > QJ U C 19 '" :0 1:; CI in OJ e 0. s B QJ 0. o ;;; OJ -0 ~ CI dJ a: >- z o In N E .a~ ....c uro Efii ~ ,~ o ro UE <1::2 m.B .....lfl oo!. ....0 ~' r~ "E .....<1.1 Ero .g-g fiie -oro ~ 5 o > b o > .... "'"0 .2;-a: ",>- ~ QJ ro= II) ro 01> U QJ C:SO ~.-, .- :5 "0.- ....3: .s:c: .2' 0 II)D OJU ><1.1 o~ .... OJ 0. .... .5~ >- >- z Z o r-.. ..... o o ... .....- .?; c: ::I o U "0 c: mill c: .... .E~ "'::I QlO1 g'0!l ~.c ~5 'Ou"" OJOJ.I1 ~-6~ 0->- OJE "0>- roro ~5. :5>- ~i '" E >- Z ~ ..... .?; c: ::I o U '0 c: 01'" C .... .2l!j ro ::I OJ 0> ~O!l SO-€ ~ ::I -oU"" ",OJ.I1 ....>'" "''0- g.>!:: <uS '0>- ro ra .s:E .~- .0>- ro ra .....3: ~"O '" E >- Z o ... ..... '. ... .~ ~ '= ... ~ "4 C <1.1 ,g u.!l ~o:o-g lrl:5.2 a: ~ lXl"t:i...., 0/ ~ '3: ~ ~'55 E" ~ ~ ..... :1:< E!.51.O 1IJ .5 u.:o;"O :5 - - OJ II)N ~ ~~~~ ~ES~~ rn~ ,~EN QJ~>-""'affi"NE~~5~<uo~~a ~~~2~~5~~~~~ffi~~~~~ .5 ~a: ~ .....~< ~g ~< .'S .~~~ Q".;;;..s.. "4 ';l:.:> ~ !:l s:: ,.~~..:::: ~ <::l~~ _ ~5::-S li::~cS ;:.':; :: ~ "" oS! ..~ ..~ 'OQ.,t\::;;: ~""5 ~-w ~~-.;. 0..:::: ... t.> ::::'-~ ;;; .;: -.;. \.)"'!: olj '. ~","*' '=... . ~ - '" ~~~ '" -- c: >- (X) rl a a a Ki o a o ui N 5-ln ..... ..... .s: 1.0 &~ 19" c.n "0 (X) or-.. 01.0 3: OJ QJ .... '6 a: C - ",'0 c.n" N ... d ro -- c: >- >- 0'1 ..... o N o o o Ill' r-.. o <;> o v,- ~ o a o lI'l- r-.. o o a In' N N .....Q) c:..... ..JIllO::", LlB'c'~ a:~ ... d z: ..... N o o o <:5 ... o o o 0- ... ~ OJ ~""'N s.a:o "0 >' '" ~<rl lXl ... d Z N N o o o 0- ... Cl o Cl 0' ... J:QJ ffiO:~ ~ J.....lO 50..... ltl 5 o > .....- U OJ e- o. '0 ~ '" .Q E ::I.., Z'II: 5.2;- ..... 'C II) 0 'C-c Co. .2 :B C OJ E - ro -- c: ro -- c: .e c: ro C z: ..., N o o o 0- III o a o <:5 lfl 5 o > tf QJ "e 0. '0 OJ .... OJ .c E..... ::I..... ::'11: .E.2;- V)"C 'O.g .20. :B C Q) E Q) 0. 0. ::I c.n >- '" ? ro -- c: ~ c: ro <: Z ... N o N co ...- N ..... o N co ...' N ..... 5 o > tf QJ e- n. "0 l!! 1IJ .c E... ::I..... Z'lt ~~ 1I1"t: 'C .g .2 a. 19 c QJ E QJ 0. 0- ::I III >- >- ? Z '" 0 __ 0 c ... "0 ~f5~ ra OJ ,...... l..O -- "" 0 QI c:: ~O\.- lXlOJa: 0: '" <: Z Lr> N o o o o Lr> o o o o' l.Il 5 o > IS :c ~d~ ~~ c..... 0' u.c. 01 c: ::I .- 0 '0.... C:S e.s ro'C E ro Be ~ Ol - '" N o o o vl N 00 NO OJ 0, ,0 <1"0 lfl 0 \D.... o o o ",- N 00 ~ g~ ,.... Lr>o lJ'l0 l...O ....:" s -..... 5 ~ '0-... ~ .....lIlE ~5a: iX~:l:a:&<c a ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F )-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances; consent agenda SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning Elmer C. Hodge tL/fI~~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances, The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for June 26.2007. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1, The petition of Timothy and Rhonda Coleman to rezone 35,21 acres from 1-2, Industrial District, to AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District for the construction of a single family dwelling, located at 5242 Beason Lane, Catawba Magisterial District. 2. The petition of Roanoke County Library Services and Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, to rezone approximately 28.71 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-2, General Commercial District, to construct a public library, and to obtain a Special Use Permit in order to allow a drive-in restaurant within the public library, located at 5690 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3, The petition of LaSonja McKinstry to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a family day care home on 0.22 acre, located at 2627 Creekwood Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. 1 Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for June 26, 2007, 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s)~, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 2 0'7 ~z_ -o10Cl~ d. \ F-I County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-206& FAX (540) 776-7155 Date received: Re ALL APPLicAiVTS C~eck type of a)3plication filed (check all that apply) ~Rezoning rtSpecial Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip 7:Htf/ij ci ) ~ bLE'1M Phone: S'z,tJ2- 6~A-<;;'/..yJ L.A-r.le Work: r<:""/u4.1 f/A- Cell#: 0~'-"7 v/T 2.-'11(/3 I Fax No.: Owner's name/address wlzip P' U41tf tiS ;fmvJd' Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Property Location S'z-;/Z- 6dAr.~-cvJ L4-.H'r;:- S,.,.,wM, ~/4-- 2t!ls:3 Magisterial District: L.t<.-f-CLlA../ {:J CA- Community Planning area: '-l tt"\. </ Existing Zoning: ---:L.... Tax Map No.: () (,,5.00 - 0 L- :5 '8 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: "}~. 2-, Existing Land Use: REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVEiC4NDCOMPPI4N (15.iH/2)ilEviiw'AfPl1cANTS (RJS;W(CP) Proposed Zoning: A 6-"] Proposed Land Use: R-eStJervft-/A( 'f-A-. l.L.vl~ Does th7{'Cll'cel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes if No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0 . . . - . .. . ;YA1UAl'jCIJ~,fJl4rVgR)ANDAJ)MIN:lS]1U Ttvli A.PPEA.J./41'PLIC4JfI'S (VIJJ-YAA) ..' . VarianceIWaiver ofSection(s) ;vIA . of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SlWfCP V/AA R/SIWICP V/AA R/SfW/CP VfAA BB Consultation ~ g 1/2" xII" concept plan ~APPJic.ation fee V Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable J Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I ~;;;,';o::;7 thot I"" ,jth" th, ~:~~the ov,'l1er's. "",or OHontr:.t pu. rchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent _~~~"/"';~ " Owner's Signature l}t~/~~ . g~ 2 Roanoke County Planning Commission April 02, 2007 Ref: Re-zoning application for 065.00-02-38.00-0000 This letter is in regard to a re-zoning request for the property identified by Tax parcel ill #065.00-02-38.00-0000. This property is currently zoned Industrial 12. The attached topographical map provides the location of the property and overall geography. Although the property borders a railroad track, numerous other features indicate the property may not be suitable for industrial development. The access to the property is via Beason Lane which terminates at the property as it crosses the railroad track. This limited access would be detrimental to the heavy traffic flow typically required for industry. Also, the portion of the property bordering the railroad track contains steep grades. The surrounding terrain indicates any industrial application to the property would require extensive grading in order to allocate significant usable area. We propose re-zoning the land to agricultural zoning. The intention ofthe change is to allow the re-modeling of a single home site on the property, A single residence does not require the same resources as that of industry. The minimal traffic flow of a single residence is more suitable for the current access capabilities. Also, the single dwelling is self sufficient in terms of water and sewer utilities by the use of a well and septic system. The property has been in the current owner's family since the early 1960's and refinancing options are limited due to current zoning. Re-zoning the property to agricultural zoning should have little impact to the adjacent property. This property currently resides next to Residential RI and agricultural zones. The adjacent property across the railroad track is zoned industrial and is particularly contoured (flat) to support industry, A zoning of Agricultural should not affect the adjacent residential zone property. The terrain between this property and the other adjoining agricultural plot is steep and not conducive to development. Current Owners: --- JUSTIFICi\. TION'FOR.'REZPNING,SPtc:IAVtJSE PE:R.1VI1T\VAIVER.ORC0l\1PPLAN(I5.2.2232). R.E VJEW . ,.., ..REQUESTS Applicant The Planning COlmnission will study rezoning, special use pennit waiver or cOlmnunity plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need andjustification for the change in tenns of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. /) O~ k~?~ krkJl- Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. 3 l.juslrFIC~TION~EbRyX~I~NCf:R~QtJEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 ofthe Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. 4 '_' .--:....'::-'.-:.<,..::_--.--.._.. ',"",,- ,,",-,": ;'.--:-. ,'.' -.-: .,_....: ':"'. .':' ..., c.":.-:..:'....,., . ,..-" ....::-',-,' -,:::':: - '-. .. JUSTlFJcA1]Q~ fOR APIVtmISTEATIVEAPJ> EAL :REQtJE;ST .. , Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additionar~heets of paper. ,/ 1. Reasons for appeal: 2. Evidence supporting claim: /" /. / / / / / / I I 5 I cONcE}>TP1ANcIIEfKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pennitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building penn it. Site plan and building pennit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require cbanges to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use pennit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent pennitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use penmt, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed., and dimensions, floor area and heights 1. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional iriformation requiredjor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of aU adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and bow they are addressed q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ~~~W.LL~ s~e p~:../ / ~. e/N/ ~-C~ .L.!-~- 07 Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing Ilst, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any timer as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: . Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units . Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) . Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash . Retail shop/Shopping center . Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc,) · Regional public facilities . Ed ucationa I/Recreational faci lities . Religious assemblies . Hotel/Motel · Golf course · Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic . Industrial site/Factory . Day care center . Bank . Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: · Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24,115,117,460,11/460,220,221,419, etc) · For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly . When required to evaluate access issues · Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) · Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem · Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) · Substantial departure from the Community Plan · Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19,2005 8 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMJT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION ApPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional infOlmation is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff andJor an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition, This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staffto the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT S TIIDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or stafffrom the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: Apri/19, 2005 ~ { 'f21V\-- ~ 72 e.. 21J vv':"'tr Name of Petiti n ~~ o --- % ... . 'one ~~~ ~ -;;< 'Of Date 9 _ Conservation _ Rural Preserve _ Rural Village \Allage Center Development t-eigh ba-hood Conservation _ Transition _ Core _ Principal Industrial Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Timothy and Rhonda Coleman A Existing Zoning: 12 Proposed Zoning: A G3 Tax Map Number: 65.0Q...02-38 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 35.21 Acres 19 April, 2007 Scale: 1" = 400' ZONING _AG3 _EP _AGl AR _AV Cl .C2 _ C2CVOO U1l _12 .pco lE'-'lS . PRO Orvl./y ~ .Pm Rl R2 _R3 .j _R4 Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Timothy and Rhonda Coleman A EXisting Zoning: 12 Proposed Zoning: A 83 Tax Map Number: 65.00-02-38 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 3521 Acres 19 April, 2007 Scale: 1" '" 400' Yz-- O\OO~d~ F-~ County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only Date Teeeived: Lj 10 7 , 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Applicatio" fee: PCfBZA date: i F D7 PlaeaTds issued: Case NumbeT ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning 51 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip Uiana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services, Roanoke County 3131 Electric Road SW Roanoke, VA 2401B Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No.: 540.772.7507 540.776.7327 540.353.7777 540.776.7326 Owner's name/address whip Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29BOO Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: 540.772.2003 540.772.2003 540.772.2193 Property Location 5690 Merriman Road Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning area: Neighborhood Conservation Tax Map No.: 097.05-01-26.00-0000 Existing Zoning: R-1 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 2 B. 71 Existing Land Use: N REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND CaMP PLAN (15.1-2132) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/SIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: C-2, with special use permit Publi c Library Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQum.ED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUJRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No X VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Walver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE A CCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RlSfW/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA RlSlW/CP V/AA ~ Consultation ~ 8 1/2" x II" concept plan ~/ Application fee Y Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Y Justification Water and sewer application Y Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the pr erty or the owne' agent or contract purchaser and am acting widl the knowledge and consent of the owner. I Owner's Signature 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2007 RESOLUTION 032707.S.d AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INITIATE AN APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 28.7 ACRES ON MERRIMAN ROAD FOR A COUNTY LIBRARY WHEREAS, Section 30-14 of the Roanoke County Code and Section 15,2-2286 of the Code of Virginia provide that whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires, an amendment to the zoning regulations or district maps may be initiated by resolution of the governing body; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke owns a parcel of land on Merriman Road of approximately 28.7 acres that is currently zoned R-1; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to construct a public library on this parcel of land. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the County Administrator, or his designee, be authorized to initiate an application to rezone the 28.7 acre parcel of land on Merriman Road owned by the Board of Supervisors to one of the commercial zoning categories. 2. That this application be submitted to the Planning Commission tor its review and recommendation, which shall be forwarded to the governing body, 3. That the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires these amendments. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2.2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services, Roanoke County The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessaI)'. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the pllJ1lose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See Sec. 30.3 (A) 3;4;7;8;10; A modern library is a public service and a community asset that provides informational, recreational, and educational services to all citizens. It also provides research and data- base support to small businesses in the community and is frequently cited as a significant "quality of life" issue on lists of major corporations when they seek to relocate. In its role as the resource for lifelong learning, it is a key element in the educational system of the community. This particular project also preserves and enhances an identified wetlands area, protects the view shed, and maintains approximately 65% of the property in its natural state. The new Library is appropriate for a C-2 zone, as noted in Sec. 30-54-1: It is a service- related activity with characteristics of a retail operation and is consistent with similar retail spaces that have already been developed on adjacent lots. The building will include community spaces, including a used book area, auditorium, meeting rooms, instructional computer labs and a coffee shop that will generate significant numbers of visitors to the site. The coffee shop has a drive-through window, which necessitates a special use permit. Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The new library fits within several themes identified in the Community Plan. It will be a gathering place for citizens, facilitate the exchange of ideas and information, encourage lifelong learning, and be a community center for the County and particularly for two magis- terial districts, Cave Spring and Windsor Hills. It is designed according to the principles of sustainable architecture and will be energy-efficient for the foreseeable future. The building has been sited on the property to respect the natural environment, preserve the wetlands and surrounding environment, and encourage passive recreation through an educational walkway which connects adjacent County-owned parkland on either side. In addition, Roanoke County Public Library has been a member of Roanoke Valley Library consortium for over 20 years and has promoted regional cooperation by serving not just area residents but citizens from throughout the valley. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The building and parking lot will be constructed along the northwest side of the lot; the majority of the property will not be developed for library use. In a second phase, the wetlands will be enhanced according to DEQ/ACE requirements, an educational raised walkway will be added, and then the land will be left in a natural state. Because the library will be oriented toward the view shed with 2 stories below road grade level, houses along Merriman mostly will be screened. Consideration for the neighborhood has been included; for example, parking lot and entrance lights will be designed to shine down, not up and out, and traffic patterns in the parking lot will promote efficient vehicle flow. Penn Forest Elementary School will have a major educational resource within walking distance. Since the library will be built on the opposite side of the lot from the properties along Crystal Creek Drive, with the wetlands remaining between, the impact will be reduced by distance. That block is already in mixed use, with a retail center in C-2 and houses in R-1. 3 I JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST Applicant Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services, Roanoke County The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in hannony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. N/A 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or wrreasonably restrict the use of the property. N/A 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. N/A 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. N/A 4 JUSTIFICATION FOR AD:MINISTRA TIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Librarv Services. Roanoke County Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: N/A 2. Evidence supporting claim: N/A 5 I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by COWlty permi tting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, conununity plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following, are considered minimwn: ALL APPLICANTS .....:L..- a. Applicant name and name of development Date, scale and north arrow Lot size in acres Or square feet and dimensions Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map nwnbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces .....:L..- b. .....:L..- c. .....:L..- d. ...:L. e. ...:L. f. y g. y h. - y 1. Y J. Additional infomzation requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERJ.11T APPLICANTS y k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site y I. AllY driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers y m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals y n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections y o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants N/A p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed N/A q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ~Mt.~ Signature of applicant ----- 04/13/07 Date 6 VlNl!:lllIh 'WlONV01! avo" NYI'UlIllllW ! ~ J..1IV1HIIl llNflO;) Hl.IlOS A'dVllHI'1 ::>nffild A.LNflO::> iiXONVOll 1I0d DNIG"llilR 1c\RN V I \ ,jP '/ I ~ z ~~ 1/... ~~ --' r ZONING _AG3 / _EP _AGl liAR _AV UC1 _C2 . C2CVOO 11 _12 .PCO I PRO _ P"TD R1 ! R2 R3 L R4 Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Diana L Ro sap epe, Director of Library Se/Y;ces, Roanoke County A Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number: 97.05-01-26 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 28.71 Acres 17 April, 2007 Scale: 1" = 400' Land Use / _ COnseIVatial _ R11l11 PTesenle _ R11l11 Village \lIlIage Center Development Neighborhood Conservation _ Transrtial -~ _ Prlncipallnduslrtal Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Diana L Rosapepe, Director of Library Services, Roanoke CQl1nty A Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number: 97.05-01-26 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 28.71 Acres 17 April, 2007 Scale: 1 ~ ::: 400' County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning \~ - 0\0 0 ~'\;}5 \ For Staff Use Onl r - 3 Receiv~d by: . 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Placards issued: Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of rPplication filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning fif Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver D Administrative Appeal D Comp Plan (lS.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address wlzip LL-"\.So Ij Q 11'1 K: A s hi. dJt; d-- 7 ~ ('t. ~ !\\.OO cd ~J ( SC\~ a /)-.; Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No,: c; 40 ' ,l '17 - 6 7 ( I ~'l4() - :s 94 - Ct~c, I 'JLID -70'2, -() 1 (()'('1 Ow. ner's name/a4liress wlzip 0\.So(~ trY'I'-q l'istr;:: :Jlo/J...7 ~u~u2.\<.wod t)( 5q \l0Y\ ~5 Property Location !;L~d.-7 G-~i(:.kuOod 0 ( Sa I'€-' B-'--lL Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: , CJLjo .- -=)'6 7- cY? ( f t:)c.jf)~ 3~4 -(d)9/ Size ofparcel(s): Acres: +("'), '}...~ 0( Tax Map No.: :J.d. t.,...., - :11-- -, b ~ .'. ~,~ ~- .......~ Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.~llJl) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RISIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: 1'\ - I Proposed Land Use: F: ~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 0 V ARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) V ariance/W aiver of Section( s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SIWICP VfAA b3 Consultation Application Justification I hereby certifY that I am either the owner of the p~ of the owner. ' R1SIW/CP VfAA R1SIWICP V/AA 8 1/2" x II" concept plan ~ Application fee Metes and bounds description . Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners or the owner' 5 agent or contra~haser and am acting with the knowledge and consent r. ~ ( / . f-' { Owner's Signature 2 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Corruuissiotl reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or ail outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional infottnation and provide written cOmments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the PlalUling Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The Roanoke County PlaMing Cofiuhission reserves the tight to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Transportation Engineering Manager ot staff from the Virginia Department of Ttansportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all neCessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the plaflhing staff and the Planning Commission. If a continliance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective Date: April 19, 2005 c/kr~ .a?!J.t~ Petitioner's Signature '1.- /~3 r07 Date I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature ofthe request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights I. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site I. Any. driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fIre hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. 1- /3 ~()? Date 6 JUSTIFICATION FOR REWNING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVlEW REQUESTS Applicant j JaSo ~ (V,\ C~; r\S \ (t/ I-i~.. ~I The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review reques~ to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. ~ f 7fidtJUL6 O-/~YrLL~ 4 J{ ~, /Ja;Ca1cz ,LLLL/t ;m~ il71-J r!iJ-n111-u.ndj -{ ~ ra~ruV ,'t~ ;tf~u_uy cZ ~\ d~ &~ ~_, r:~'1:/ULt- ~ i>>).L~ {")tul{Juc~~JJ2;rtA:c.&V. ~rt<Y( .tff~~ i~ tk (}l~1'~ fffi jJJdlvur-J ~ ~, Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community ~an. . J~ ~ ,jc~, ~/M j ~,h 1unthu , ') -t/UWafb "t<<'-f'd",,#ct-1.Ltcial /Jm~ '~a"'~1f ~t ' ~W <1YtL Ztv cpifg IJ.J' #J/I/iWlll ('JJ/l,rnh; P/ rrt&i!L~ -.r 1jU! w." M- 0t.(;a, Please describe the impact(s) ofthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fITe and rescue. ~ ~ ~ (1d r~ c7-it! fJd1:fUrZ,', (L~~ ~,-r5f-' },o/1/P'" k' ~ 'Ziv jiad? tI;!AXJ""'~ eN't to,v c.N'1~:M cI";LtJ(lLL'd~) cr~/ ~ ~Jt!<<t1'~J ~ ,~j)-Mf-c7f6 tJ yYL/Y'-LA/ ~~(.f.rU j/ft-J L-t ;lc~!1 ~ttrJ. 3 ,~1rS.", !) REFERENCEs.- DEED BOOK /657, PAGE !!6; PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 55 TAX MAP NO. 44.04-04-.20 PRESENT OHNER: MICHAEL A. NEAL .2) !HIS SUR~Y WAS PERFORMEP M!HOL/T !HE BENEfiT OF A ll1Z.E REPORT BY AN ATTORNEY AND, !HEREFORE; AlA Y NOT NECESSARIL Y INPICA 1T ALL ENCUMBRANCl3' UP& !HE PROPERTY. J) PROPERTY SHOHN HEREON POES NOT LIE M!HIN !HE UAlITS or A /00 YCAR fi.OOO BOUNPARY AS Dl3'IGNAlFD BY CURRENT ffAlA AlAPS. SEE ROOD INSURANCE RAlF AlAP NO. 5!!6/COOJ7D. (ZONE AJ 4) !HIS PLA TIS BASEP ON A CURRENT flEW SUR~Y. I I I I I L_ ....J N :;;: :i: w ~ r- t1 t'") LUw ~ If)LU....JZ .....U- . ~" ~ ~ "<I"-CD<( ONttoi ~~~ ~ <(<(O:i:o.. ~~G ~Zocnuj S::i !15 ~' i$!{d::f: -01"-.0 ~ Z[]C'"lN<( ~Vj~ OCI"-.lf) ~ fit ::;:;"J-6@J 8 oc ,a:J a:J W I..... CD~t'")lf)....J " NLU--[] Qj q: If)....Jooo .....<("<1""<1"1- t'")1J')!:3~....J I DUX BUR Y Ie 0 U R T / ~ 1/ , 1 !:5 1 (P.B. 11, PC 170) 1 1 o q,~' I 1 ~ 1 LOT 21 ,~.~' 1 I : /~/ I N79"01'JO.E- 77.00,1 4.3' IPF ~ _ _ wooden fence along property line "56, o E"t:> Q. H E / G H T S ~;~ NOR T H SEe T / 0 N 1 7.7 BLOCK 1 (P. B. ;; P G. 5 5) TAX #44. 04-04-20 lOT4 9-584 s.F. 0.220 AC. LOT 3 LOT 1 BEVERL Y IPS 1.2' @ DEL TA = 0"57'00. RADIUS = 9J5.00' TANGENT = 7.75' ARC = 75.50' BEARING S78"JJ'00.W CHORD = 75.50' odjoiner's chain/ink fence j :3:: . o .<:-o.j Q ~ TAX #44.04-04-19 LOTS 10'X75' C.kE. --- LEGENlJ IPS.............lron Pin Set IPF..........Iron Pin Found R/W........Right-of-Way S.F.............Square Feet AC. ......................Acres D.B. .............Deed Book P.B. .............. Plat Book PG. .......................Page con c...... ......... .concrete alum. .......... ....aluminum e...............Water Meter C"Q..,...............Utnity Pole M.B.L...Minimum Building Line GAE.. ....... Guy Anchor Easement S.S.E.......Sanitary Sewer Easement -O-.......Wooden Fence -Q-.....Chainlink Fence ~..Overhead Utilities in <0 ~ ~ 1.7' TAX #44.04-04-21 ~ LOT ~ o o 5' 250.15' TO TEXAS- HOLLOW ROAD 59.60' -S79"01'JO"W cone. curbing 010 er meter utility pole CREEKWOOD DRIVE 50' R/W GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 I._~ PHYSICAL IAlPROIEAlENT SVRIEY FOR LB. McKINSTRY AND LASONIA MARIE McKINSTRY SHOHfNG LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SECTION 1 "BEVERLY HEIGHTS NORTH" (PLAT BOOK .7, PAGE 55) 51 !VA lFP Ai ONe CREEKIf/OOP P/?/ /IE CA lAJllBA AlAG/SlFR/AL D/SlR/CT ROANOk"E COlIN TY, I1'RC;;W/A SUR/lEJfP DECEMBER 4, 2004 SCALE.. /. = 30' JOB .# 04-031 IJ') Z o IJ') :; LU oc ~N/"') o . -1 .... .a: ~O -1>- W ..> Wa: .....J~ (9(j) 00 .z ~<( >--.J a:: a: <( -1 OJ ?J ~ ~ ~ () ?3 GAVIN CIR -I ~ t :c- O ';: 0 o oP- Z ZONING CRSS\(.\j\JOO ?J 0 _AG3 _EP _AG1 \ AR _AV C1 / _C2 _ C2CVOD 11 / _12 _PCD IIIIpRD _pm R1 R2 R3 Y R4 Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: LaSinja McKinstry A Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: R1 Tax ~apNu"!be:: 44.04-04-20 Maglstenal District: Catawba Area: 0.22 Acres 17 April, 2007 Scale: 1"" 100' {P ~ ~ ~ (1'\ ~ () ~ GAVIN CIR ..-\ ~ ~ :t- O \ ~ Land Use _ Conservation _ Rural Preserve _ Rural Village IIIl1age Center lRvelopment Neighborhood Conservation _ Transition _ Core Y _ Principal Industrial / Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: LaSinja McKinstry A Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: R1 Tax MapNumbe:: 44.04-04-20 Mag/stenal Dlstnct: Catawba Area: 0.22 Acres 17 April, 2007 Scale: 1"= 100' ACTION NO. ITEM NO, H -I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the reservation and dedication of a public greenway easement associated with the Green Hill Park segment of the Roanoke River Greenway through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Green Hill Park, Catawba Magisterial District AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Pete Haislip Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Elmer C. Hodge UyvuJl j-f ~F County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /) .J" 4~'~ )~~u~~ ('4 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism plans to construct a 1 O-foot wide greenway in Green Hill Park that will be partially funded through federal funds associated with a Transportation Enhancement Grant administered through the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and allocated to the Roanoke River Greenway Project. In order to get plan approval for construction of the Green Hill Park segment of the Roanoke River Greenway, the VDOT Right Of Way Manager in the Salem District Office has requested that the 10-foot wide greenway corridor associated with this project be reserved and dedicated as a public greenway easement to be protected in perpetuity for public use. Therefore, the VDOT Salem District Office is requesting that the Board of Supervisors reserve and dedicate a public greenway easement within Green Hill Park, Catawba Magisterial District, as follows: As shown on engineering plans prepared by Draper Aden Associates, the engineering design firm for the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park Segment, the new 10-foot wide public greenway easement would contain approximately 47,000 square feet to be reserved and dedicated along a greenway corridor located between the Roanoke River and Green Hill Park Road (Route 1185) in Green Hill Park on property owned by Roanoke County and designated as Tax Map Numbers 055.00-01-08.00-0000 and 055,00-01-12,00-0000. Any portion of the greenway corridor that falls within the right of way for Green Hill Park Road (Route 1185) will not be included in the public greenway easement but will be protected for public use within the public right of way for Green Hill Park Road (Route 1185). FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact associated with the reservation and dedication of this public greenway easement as the easement will be held by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. AL TERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the reservation and dedication of this public greenway easement to be held by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in association with the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park. This alternative will allow the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park, to proceed forward through the VDOT Enhancement Grant project approval process. 2. Decline to authorize the reservation and dedication of this public greenway easement to be held by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in association with the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park. This alternative will likely greatly impede or prevent the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1, Staff recommends Alternative 1: Reservation and dedication of this public greenway easement to be held by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in association with the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park. This alternative will allow the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, Green Hill Park segment in Green Hill Park, to proceed forward through the VDOT Enhancement Grant project approval process. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RESERVATION AND DEDICATION OF A PUBLIC GREENWAY EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREEN HILL PARK SEGMENT OF THE ROANOKE RIVER GREENWAY THROUGH PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AT GREEN HILL PARK (TAX MAP NOS. 55.00-01-08 AND 55.00-01-12) CATWABA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of two parcels of land containing 196,61 acres off Green Hill Park Road in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos, 055.00-01-08.00-0000 and 055.00-01-12.00-0000; and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has requested the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to reserve and dedicate a public greenway easement along a greenway corridor located between the Roanoke River and Green Hill Park Road (Route 1185) in Green Hill Park on property owned by Roanoke County in Green Hill Park; WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including easements, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 8, 2007; and the second reading was held on May 22,2007. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by reservation and dedication as a public greenway easement a 1 O-foot greenway corridor located between the Roanoke River and Green Hill Park Road (Route 1185) in Green Hill Park. 2. That reservation and dedication of a public greenway easement as shown and described on plans prepared by Draper Aden Associates dated January 31,2007 and identified as Sheets C.04, C.05 and C.06, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A, Band C, is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. 2 ~ 0: < 0.. ::1>- -0: I< zo W.:. W:) 0:0 c.:>1Xl -- ,,- J .,/' ~>- 0:0: << 0..0 -,Z -':) -0 IIXl Z w w 0: c.:> ~ 0::: <( a.. ---l ---l :r: 2 W W a: C) W (f) <( :r: a.. I- o W , o a: a.. ~ $.- 2m Wo W'<t 0:::<0 C)I./":) o:::~ W:::) >'-' 0:::0 WI./":) ~O o ~ 2~ <(...... 20m ~a:~ a..:20 W~9 1-<(2 {f){f)W -,,-....... _O"t.'J "__n....-; ~~'rlll .-;-~""{ 'Il'\1lIIla.-~". <( ~ ...... C Q) E ..c () co ...... <( t;" .5 ~; h -~~ ~1 d _; U~ ..~ \i\ ;"\~ . Ii .i( .,. \ ~ . ~ I ~ t ~ . ~ ~ ~o . '$ l~ \ s' \ ut I .~ h: \ \ \ \'1NI"JI:lIfI''3>1CtiVc+:l ~o ,..lN110:) A'v'MN::J::J~~ ~::MI~ 3)fON'v'O~ "oS::J'Gm"6G~"OON31:138V\1nN 1.::J3rm:ld 1.00^ >H:I"'d TIH N33l:1D {OO'I7G 01. 00'0") 3llol0l:ld ~ N"'ld ~J ~ ~~ is: ~j ~ ' " t t ~ ~II ai Iii b~ 8 e5 3~ r~ ~~ i!i · i! i'~ 8~ i! .~ f' J~ ~b ~~ i!A ii ~< ~A~~ ~~ ~'.t Q ...... ....: \. -.. "I;." ."..UISI"1.,.....~"I...1t.l..'"'.II"!li:..II1~.",'I!.:au:oI ~ S;llP.!:JOSSY U;lPY J;ldP.JQ ~ }~~\ sJ '<\ I 'II 1 ~~~ ~ ~.;tf 'l,T" J,' " m If c~~ J,-'~, ~i~ ;"/7" / I li~ J./ t h~ ~y / / Hj~ 2', I ,.;j! i'io' 'iVi~ ::1.I;I!~ r' I ~ ~ I ~~ If I I~ / I .~. ,1: I ~SJ .ir I ~~b !'I :~I a - I;, j ~i~~ ~( .;.~;~. : iii I hd \~ \ ij I~ t \ \ rlr~~ i I I ._~~. I , ' \ \ Iii B ,\ o:le rrj ~j: ~ i~~~ ~i ~i~ ~ ~ p/: I[ /i;' ~~' ~ir J . . r~ .1 ~hjss 51" .; I' ~5~. In ~l " I ih. , ,". , ;SI; I u t- - - or.....',_ .nuc,.,. ."MI. 'lllU' ~. I -I .".. "". ab-- ---.- ~ .~j h. I ilC,.' I I . ",5;. I I 'II I It ......""'" - II'I.I.....-m. '--j-- ."C'I'OI']llI.J I ii:s -1_ ...,........J . 'II!~ . lii~~~ 'I l !!II . ..-- "" loCi'l\" '1:10' I !~ih- -1 I 5~,',~.__ na!2- II u" .-''''. .'~1I:lIe ~ ~ ; I~~ I t1M~...... ~..'E ..."",.~ '9'IoO-U IN ......'..., .......~ ~-""" Irdlaa IDU , J , I , I , , I , , 11'110(II-_ .. ..1 _II , , ,~ " . ~ ///,1' I . ~..,. ::; ~ ,: ': ~ ~ 0 , ',7 . "Is 0 f i ~ ! ; aJ (Q ...... c Q) E ..c () co ...... <( -~- ~.., "__.'M_. ~~"::~..: ",,~qLp". ~..~ .~t~ w."- "reA ~"ii .'u' .. . :iQ"1 j~j; :;l~ '14 Jli ~r~ ~i; i:SS ~~' ... " "'" ~ ~" -"- , 0:., 'lf1t It i~ lJ.l t!:r ~.~ .tit "Ii /J'-" ,/ " " I/lNI JoLt, 'J >la~ YOO :tQ J J.N11Q7 AVMN:3:3tJ~ tJ:3^ltJ :3>10NVOtJ t ~OS8 'GO~"6G~"OON3 : 1-l38VmN 1.83rOl-ld 1.00^ !: >H:llfd l'H N331:l8(OS1-68 01. OOI-"'C) 31tJOI-ld \I N'tfld ~~ ~~ ,q !~ih~ I ::: ": 5;." · 'i~S~~ .. h:Zl l ""'1 'J3III ~~ "-"'II'~ I _ tl'GMllo.J ~~. - 1-....:..... .iie~... ! r ~, ~I~p "1",.11 il~~~'- -,;., ~ iAU: 'r",,"~ --j f-- - t - r- , :H ~'" ' ~\: ~h3'B -\ .' .1.. ' o!,' ',. t U~;" I HI _ ';II:; -1-\lIIWI"a:-.!I I; " . ~~I'I . ~~,,~'. I PS"1- -- t::l I ."... ':IlII4I . -_..~ 3~ -r ....., """ ~m~. w .,,--., a,.' '.: ~ '1;5~. 1"- 2ill ~ .'a&=2N !~ - nM"fIII_" ;I~ I :::.": lli; · ~: ~~~ t li!5;~ /-..-:.:.... I,tll -I .w,,_ ~! i l~ ~ ~i! ~ n ~ bl1 ~.. ~E as !~ i~ ~~ ~i AI Ii i~ lIIb ~& Ei ~;I ~I ..~~~ ;I~ l!:_" "" - '~~r:: -1I.nG.. lb' .~, "-I ...... tDt) i~1; · II i" asa I1W 53 " ':."'to'2~ i'!, 'I rnf"~ 'Of -ii;: ~ ...~~~ I:: - .-NoW.... ill ..__ ~!~I It..... a:IIU ,5;: : II I --....,........ - .r~.,... ~3 ...... ..... Il'~ -, ......... ~ .~1;'. · 1:,.._.- ... _ 1I;''''-1~ I I ~WltlIJW U:: - ...... .... !~'I I , ~In '" 5 . ., ~ g 0 !"l'i'/;~:~ 0 ..-- c,.,uoft b.J , , , . -, ....191'~ I "~'2100) . \.... -' ".11 .- u ...... c Q) E ..c () co ...... ~ i ~ . . 01- C") \(j. , . o g : :, ; 0)-;.: , ~ t i i i.1 J; I - ...... I i-G L.~;;; - -. ",.~ I " ~il!H f"A ..... :;Ii r-. __.. - I .......... I 'liI -"..... I--'S~!I I : .~,~;g , ~':l:'~ \ ~~!,~~ 1- ;::.. ,~~~H · f" . ~g · ~mi I ~. I J I'ICII UdJM -....... """...".. ....-. ,... 6:u. MJ,'....u. ~........ l"C", ..... I "II ,- -~tiU ..: ;:' ~'! '- -Ele;i E. " '" ~; ';g ':' fi .~ " -, ~F ~~~~ ~! ~:~ ~" oil q~ ~l &J i ~~ "~ !~ ~J ~& h ~~ ~~ ~~ !~ . ~~ i Ii ~ h ~ ;~ ~ ~ V, I () !;; I J I Zlii :~i!U ~ .',' ~~ , Elll' , LeU I I I\IGt ".J. ~l"""'~ I zn -:ssU . " ,.,; . e~!-!O" I I ". .~! (Q',,"Ul.l 1><<:.10..11 H i;~~ .~I~ H ~:~; :;~ ~". $- J~~~ :p m-.. b ~~:~~ i~i~; :~ ,.j2i~ . . \, ."\} ~ - '- ,. ,...... "", ..... PCl ~"OUI --... ~m .~~2 ~I~ g~;' ; .~ ~~g I ;11 t J: I '. PLAN & PROFILE (39+50 TO 54+00) GREEN HLLPARK ~ VDOT PROJECT NUMBER' ENOO-129-1D2.C501 ~ROANOKE RIVER GREENWAY "~- COLNT" Cf FCMPI\E. 'JIFlCIN!A ACTION NO, ITEM NO. H-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to the Western Virginia Water Authority and the creation of a new drainage easement through property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Walrond Park, Hollins Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Pete Haislip Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Air Distributors (a wholesale distributors/warehouse) is requesting that the Board of Supervisors convey a sanitary sewer easement across Walrond Park, Hollins Magisterial District, as follows: As shown on engineering plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC, the design engineering firm for Virginia Air Distributors, the new 20' wide public sanitary sewer easement would contain approximately 7,900 square feet to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and the creation of a new five- foot wide stormwater drainage easement would contain approximately 1,800 square feet to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park on property owned by Roanoke County and designated as Tax Map Number 027.10-02-19.00-0000. Staff has met on site with representatives from Lumsden Associates, PC and has approved the easement locations as identified on the attached plat. Virginia Air Distributors has 1 agreed to make necessary stormwater drainage improvements within Walrond Park associated with the directing of stormwater runoff from the Virginia Air Distributors site into an existing inadequately configured stormwater drainage ditch located in Walrond Park. Stormwater drainage improvements in Walrond Park will consist of approximately 233 linear feet of VDOT standard PG-2A, Type C1 concrete paved ditch, a VDOT standard 01- 12A drop inlet with Type -II grate sitting on a monolithic box, 30 linear feet of VDOT standard EC-1, Class-I riprap transition to a Type "0" ditch and 30 linear feet of transition from a Type "0" ditch to a natural drainage channel that exists in the park. An existing park fence and several existing trees will be relocated during installation of the stormwater improvements and the required relocation of these park structures will be coordinated with the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism, In the typical development project, the developer would donate drainage easements and improvements to Roanoke County. Since these drainage improvements will be made on County property, the County cannot donate to itself an easement across its own property, However, the Virginia Department of Transportation requires the creation of an easement since these drainage improvements will also benefit State Route 1823. By this action, the Board will create a drainage easement to satisfy this requirement. Staff, utilizing the Roanoke County standard formula of 40% of assessed value of the easement requested (1,800 sq. ft.) has determined the fair market value of the sanitary sewer easement to be $4,000.00. However, staff recommends that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements described above that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park. FISCAL IMPACT: The fair market value of the sanitary sewer easement is $4,000,00. However, the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism recommends that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park, These stormwater drainage improvements will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to the Western Virginia Water Authority and the creation of stormwater drainage easement for the purpose of providing a sanitary sewer connection and a stormwater drainage outfall on property owned by the County at Walrond Park and that the fees associated with the requested easement be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. 2. Decline to authorize the requested conveyance and creation of the easements, 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1: authorize the conveyance of a sanitary sewer easement to the Western Virginia Water Authority and the creation of stormwater drainage easement for the purpose of providing a sanitary sewer connection and a stormwater drainage outfall on property owned by the County at Walrond Park and that the fees associated with the requested easements be waived in exchange for the stormwater drainage improvements that Virginia Air Distributors has agreed to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park, 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELDATTHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY AND THE CREATION OF A NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT THROUGH PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AT WALROND PARK (TAX MAP NO. 27.10-02-19) HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a parcel of land containing 37.86 acres off Walrond Drive in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 027.10-02-19.00-0000; and, WHEREAS, Virginia Air Distributors has requested the conveyance of a new public sanitary sewer easement to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and that a stormwater drainage easement to be created along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park; WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including easements, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007; and the second reading was held on May 22,2007. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Western Virginia 1 Water Authority for a new public sanitary sewer easement to be granted along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its tie-in at an existing sanitary sewer line located in Walrond Park and that a new stormwater drainage easement be created along the edge of Walrond Park Road to its outfall at an existing stormwater drainage channel located in Walrond Park. 2. That conveyance to the Western Virginia Water Authority of a sanitary sewer easement as shown and described as "Plat showing New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement to be granted to the Western Virginia Water Authority thru the property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Walrond Park) Tax #027.19-02-19.00-0000 situated at the end of Walrond Drive ..." prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated January 31,2007, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved, 3. That a new stormwater drainage easement as shown and described as "Plat showing New Drainage Easements to be created through the property of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Walrond Park) Tax #027.19-02-19.00-0000 situated along Walrond Park Road ...n prepared by Lumsden Associates, P,C" dated January 31,2007, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby authorized and approved. 4. That the County accepts as payment for the sanitary sewer easement the specified stormwater drainage improvements as shown on engineering plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC and as agreed to by Virginia Air Distributors to make in Walrond Park that will provide both engineering and aesthetic benefits to Walrond Park. 5. That the County Administrator, or any assistant county administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, 3 . ~'. ~.... ~~ ~n~ I '- ---- "' i!: ~~I I "~::l~1 <::I '\ ~~~ ~ VJ \ ~~ \ ~!li , _ "'~ \ ~~ I II ~ e ~~ ~~ ~~: ~: L~Vi\1 II ~~ ~!iiiliili:l~1!~~~~~~ I II.",~ 8 ~I::B""~5G~ ~~:~~~ r- -J1-.J1 8~ ~i!!;;!il'd;:; :; ::' "'~~ I I I Hi~ilii1 ~ h~ J r- I~~I I ~~~il'~ " ~ I - I~~I ~"e5iik ""~ I~ i'5 ~:a s. I (.) ~ Q::~ ~"-i~ I ~:a 'I<::lbjl. ~l."tn__ Vi J t.> ~ ~ I ~ ~ I :g ~b.. o.J .....: ~ ~ ~ ct! ..J~ Vi ....h.Oi ~ "':;0:"0 J ~ t$ b ~ ::: ~~ ~ ii.~ / /:IIT;;~\l-J ~"' ! I ~ I ..~.. I - \ \ a<i'9. - -- , \-.~.~ . \ ID ."Olf 3 .I;<;S<<, N \>..:.-;. (Af/& ~17Bnd .0,) ,,-g- 'e;'. ':J dAIIIa aN01I1i'M ~ "~1:!~1 / , ------------ ",~~e ; / ~ ~V) ., ~~ ~ ~; :;: ~ Iii! / ~i l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tn ~~ It I , lD ~ l'! ! ~ 5 ~ ~~~~~ i. , ~ II! I; ~~~ lj'8~~g , i~1 ~ ~~ ill i~~ ~~Vl~- I ~ '/.....1 Q Cil!s ltIl!s ~ciQ :!~~~ , 4/! i1il it ~~- , · i I ~jJ;~ ~~ uj~ " n' I"r I:~U:~ 3i /" "l:ltI~l!s~~~ Uo : ;../ ~~; ~ ~iil ~ ~;;: , it: ~~;hl;~ ~~~ '../ ~I~!f~ 1:1~1 C.T.J ~~- '" I~:~~I~ @~ ~ W., e~~:!I/lIs. ~~23 ~~~ I e ~b -Jw c::: · s ri!h~~ .~ " ~ ~ ~I~l~j~~ ~ Vi ~~ ~~ia~ ,,- ~ e!~ lll~i~ii '4 ~ ~. "",s~OO'J~1 I ~ - JP\~" "n"Lll~~O'900t\.e"IM. . OMP'IOULH90 LlnO"'I~lOI.I.'5iZQO .... C -- I - - ----.~-- <t: - ii i: x w . /L'98G I 3 sr;~!lt N ~ G ~ ~....<..S I ""'Cl... --gLl)' ~a5C1:5 ~ ~ eJ ~ "'" E-.. ~ e .::s 2:; _ eLl..:Z:, ~ ::s LI..-..:t: go t5 , C') ~ 2:;::...OCCI) Ie Q:; ~o~e-..>-l:Q~'Q'g~~s I~~ '" '" 0: 0: >- >< CO:o; 1i'. ~ """" <:> O!i a t:i C eJ h ~ Ii' - '1' a!:: ,~ "_. ~ " . ~ '" a. :;,; '" I '" a " _ _ '" ~ ~o:" "S ~ ;;,~~ g >-" g " ~5 ~ " ~o:o:.."a.Co..06"~u a.OilJ '" ito '" <:> ~ '" '-' ;;, '5 _ a ~ '" " ~~"'~~~~~"'~~;~~'@0~ ~ ><Oitoh"C~~~~ "'O~~ ~f-;;~~~~ )((j) ~/:JC/) h::r:: C ~ Q:;~. ~ h 0: "" ;;! C'i : ~ :n g ~ ~ II :g - ;;; ~ cO :3 ~ ..., d z Iii :f ~ W 2: _ ... 0 0 ~ 0 (/J -"'::1 :;~8 ,. ~ . ~~~ "''''z 5~D ;~~ ;i~3 O.....@J I ;;;; "- ~ .:.; < ::1 ~ .' ,/"9<: I ] S<-fE' N II I II L_ ---- ........ II o "\ kJ II 8 \ ~i~1 II ". ~ ~~ \ ~i5 I 1\ ~I ~;~~~~ LCj~\i::. ~ I ;;s~ i!:~~ OfO: <:l~l.J II ~. lti :IE:<<:cs r -J1---J\ ~ 0.: ~~~ I I >< ~ ~ I r- I t'5 I I ~ ~~ I ~ I~\ZI ;><;:t i!: ~ -<( l.Lj :t:: ~<..igs I I~~ 'lgs~1 "" Sl.J kJ, -<( L() V) I ~~ ~1~kJl ~ e5 /0) ><':- te"l:: ~t'5 ~lkJ I~ a. I :'O:"C ~Ll)_ I ~~ ~ f.---j :;::Q.~'.2~ I I ~~ cPl- ~e::~Cj I I l I I ~ V) I ~ )hj - - - - - ---L - - - ~ I i. .7fijJ,,,, S ,9Z'6tf ] Sq,~G.9Y N - _ "I:: (3LL) .9BZt- (M/t; J178fJd ,Oq) 12'8 ~,~ voer# a.uI01!:Jas 'VA ~'L,fi~~I~ &\I8Q QN081VM If) j:c: Ll) ---------------- I t-: ~ I ~2 ! ~ ~ !l ~ ~ I, il~ 'Ii! t; ~ ~ ~ l! ~ '~~,,~ I l'l~ '~!l ~~ Ii! ~ ~ ~ ~~ '/':- I~ ~ ~~ll ~ ~~Ug 1 '" ~ ~ilal ~~ ':'!:!~:;l;;; ,. ","" : ~~ ~~O, Q ~:/'~ ~ ~ I t:~~ ~i " ", " ~ Ii!~ ~~ n 15 ~~'5,. I ~!i! !i........ ill I' Pe E-< '" · ." "l! II ~ Q ~ '~' o:g~/'~ ~liCl:c ~~ !LI ",Pe", ~ 5i~~~ lfl ~ I z ci C:,'" "'I:~ ~i 1~12~ It) ': ~€;J~:~ ~~;~ ~i~ ; ',olt ~ :<Xi I k me;' ~ ~ i I M~> PI;, lfg;~~"i d I' ':l ~ . I!l.. ~l!ll!d!!;(~1 '~I:";,~ ':f ~ ~ If,,;o; l!l~1'! ~ '~II':!~ 'j Ii~~~lf!;!ftl !, ~~~ '1_'" ~~i~I~~i~ " ~L,-J- ~~ ~i~hnl!~ Lu I' C/ +-r ~I il~e ~~i Cl:~ ~g0! ~~ ~ ~~ ~~I'~i~ !I~ !'" I!l.. 0;:" If ~ ~.J .... , ~- ~~ "'81'S.... ., 0 · ., 'Iii ~ .. "",..." ,. "~9()\...\LS~9()\9()() O"P'~OtoL. ~lnO..<III~ZO$Bl5Z90 2 I --- -- co ...- :Q I: X W .... ..... o -.J I: 0.: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~Cll2 In..!. ~ ~e""'~~i3 a~~i{OO(a: ~~~~~~ o 2~ O"C ...., 10<n\::.... 2co~Cl::" oj C. <n c:: c.:i 'I ~~ Cl.. '" ~ e=:. ~_- 'T 8 ~ ~a ~ l..J<n-.J- " ~ LL ~lti "':;::0, c::i ~'<t: o ><0,: ~ Q "'t Q r... lLJ Q a O::::<t: ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ "> ~ 00:::..... ~ lJ.. 0 0 "'tc.,:, ~ ol:l::lCl:l.......,6Q~ ~ >- ~~OQ;:..: c.,:,CI:l8.....>-.CI:lO:::o;~ ~ ~ ~~1:5 E-.s:a: 'I ~~ ~~L5Q2;~ C'\j-J2:; Q O:::~:::i~~o~:::> i7j t30Q 8c..~ 6 <.:>8 .....~<.:>lLJ :::i-J-~ "'t :s~~ ~rJ)~ ~ 3~ it ~ll:lJ:: c~'-'~"'t~ Q g2;o ~Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ iE~ i2 oc.. V5 t"- o o (\J r.: t"- b li'J li'J (\J II ,0 , o ~ a. <: d z Iii ... <( o ~"'::;: ~~8 1"N(j ;!:"'c.... ""z ~~o ~~~ WX~ Z<{...J O"-@ I == c.. <( ::;: .:1 ;;: ~ w w '" ::J 0 Z ..,. ~ ~ z Z 8",G UJI.O~ :i5~> ~ N w- j::2x"" co~~ ..,. .<{ ~q~ ..,.c.. ~iQ o...~ -z iflz W....:: be: <<en --- 0::: UO-< OGJ_ ifl>-z iflO:::(3 <<;::Jo::: Cf) _ Z I >- WCf)_ of&~ ifl~O ~zz ?,--< ~~O -::l~O::: ACTION NO. ITEM NO. II-1' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Wanda G. Riley, CPS Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (Appointed by District) The five-year term of Carlton W. Wright, Hollins Hills Magisterial District, will expire on June 30, 2007. As requested by Supervisor Flora at the Board meeting on May 8, 2007, Mr. Wright was contacted by the Clerk's Office and has advised that he is willing to serve an additional term. If the Board wishes to make the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. 2. Cable Television Committee - Roanoke County The three-year term of David Jones will expire on June 30, 2007. As requested by Supervisor Altizer at the Board meeting on May 8,2007, Mr. Jones was contacted by the Clerk's Office and has advised that he is willing to serve an additional term. If the Board wishes to make the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. 3. Cable Television Committee - Roanoke Valley Regional The three-year term of David Jones, Roanoke County at-large member, will expire on June 30, 2007. As requested by Supervisor Altizer at the Board meeting on May 8, 2007, Mr. Jones was contacted by the Clerk's Office and has advised that he is willing to serve an additional term. If the Board wishes to make the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. 4. Clean Valley Council The two-year term of Stephen McTigue will expire on June 30,2007. As requested by Supervisor Wray at the Board meeting on May 8,2007, Mr. McTigue was contacted by the Clerk's Office and has advised that he is willing to serve an additional term. If the Board wishes to make the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. The two-year term of Dennis "Chip" Harris will expire on June 30, 2007. 5. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) The three-year term of Rita J. Gliniecki will expire on June 30, 2007, The CPMT has voted to request that the Board of Supervisors re-appoint Ms. Gliniecki for another three-year term as provided in the CPMT by-laws. Ms. Gliniecki has agreed to serve an additional term if appointed by the Board of Supervisors. If the Board wishes to ratify the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. 6. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Appointed by District) The following three-year terms will expire on June 30, 2007: Jack W. Griffith, Cave Spring Magisterial District; Randy Smith, Hollins Magisterial District; and Tim Guilliams, Vinton Magisterial District. 7. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission The three-year term of Richard Kelly expired on April 8, 2007, Mr. Kelly has advised that he does not wish to serve an additional term. 8. Virginia Western Community College Board The four-year terms of David P. Mitchell, Jr., and Dr. Lorraine Lange will expire on June 30,2007. As requested by Supervisor Flora at the Board meeting on May 8, 2007, Mr. Mitchell and Dr. Lange were contacted by the Clerk's Office and have advised that they are willing to serve an additional term. If the Board wishes to make the appointment at this meeting, the confirmation will be placed on the Consent Agenda. 2 9. Western Virginia Water Authority Board of Directors John Williamson, at-large member, resigned from the Board effective November 16, 2006. This four-year term will expire on June 30,2008. At-large members are selected by the majority vote of the other six members of the Board and confirmed by Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The three-year term of Elmer C. Hodge will expire on June 30, 2007. 3 Sl-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 22,2007, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of minutes - May 8, 2007 2. Resolution establishing salaries for the County Administrator and County Attorney. 3. Request to authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement with ITT to repair and replace damage to storm drains. 4, Request to accept and appropriate grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Forestry. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER S-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution establishing salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County Administrator and the County Attorney receive annual evaluations conducted by the Board of Supervisors. The attached resolution establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for the 2007-08 fiscal year. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased from $145,628.00 to , which includes the County longevity supplement. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased from $130,322.00 to , which includes the County longevity supplement. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salaries shall be July 1, 2007. ACTION NO, ITEM NO. .;:r= 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of an agreement with ITT Corporation, Night Vision Division (ITT-NV) to repair and replace damaged storm sewer facilities SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,A) , _ ,# ~~ ~gtA/ rllA>coYrl-'Y>"~'" .-/ (;; SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During recent operations ITT Corporation, Night Vision Division ("ITT-NV") damaged approximately 545 feet of the County's concrete pipes and other storm water management facilities as a result of an unplanned release of process water. ITT-NV has agreed to repair or replace the damaged pipes at its cost and expense. These storm sewer facilities were 30-50 years old. County Staff has met with representatives of ITT-NV and has reviewed and approved the plans and methods to be used for this work. The work shall be completed within the next six months, Under this agreement ITT-NV will conduct environmental soil sampling, it will guarantee the work for one year, and it shall indemnify and hold harmless the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement with ITT-NV for the repair or replacement of damaged storm sewer facilities. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J- 4- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Forestry SUBMITTED BY: George W. Simpson, III, P.E. County Engineer Elmer C. Hodge ttf~. j-{~i:YC County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATO~'S COMMENTS: _~.~I tL",.c--c..h.<(..}}'L.L..J'C'/ ayr SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Community Development applied for and has been awarded a grant in the amount of $10,000 for "Riparian Buffer Planting for Palm Valley Phase I" from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Forestry. This grant will be matched with in-kind and volunteer labor resulting in minimal expense from the Department of Community Development. Grant funds will be used to plant native trees and vegetation near Carvin Creek in the Palm Valley area where flood-prone houses were previously bought and removed by the County as part of our flood mitigation efforts. The planting of trees in this area will help to minimize our maintenance efforts and will enhance water quality in this section of the Carvin Creek watershed. FISCAL IMPACT: No appropriation of funds is necessary. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative 1: Accept the grant and authorize staff to begin the project. Alternative 2: Decline acceptance of the grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. (Y- / GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA % of General Amount Amount Prior report balance $13,281,742 8.08% Addition from 2005-06 Operations 1,506,678 Audited balance at June 30, 2006 14,788,420 July 1, 2006 Payment on Loan from Explore Park 20,000 Balance at May 22, 2007 14,808,420 9,01% Note: On December 21,2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for 2006-07 at a range of 8%-9% of General Fund Revenues 2006 - 2007 General Fund Revenue $164,315,790 8% of General Fund Revenues $13,145,263 9% of General Fund Revenues $14,788,420 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at a range of 8%-9% of General Fund revenus and will be increased over time to the following ranges: 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 8.5%-9.5% 9.0%-10.0% 9.5%-10.5% 10,0%-11.0% Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Elmer C. Hodge [.tf County Administrator Approved By !Y-~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Audited Balance at June 30,2006 Amount $5,834,217.61 Remaining funds from completed projects at June 30, 2006 631,412.94 Transfer from Department Savings 2005-2006 453,189.00 12/5/2006 Renovations to Roanoke County Courthouse (184,775.00) 1/23/2007 Back Creek Station Addition (50,000.00) 3/13/2007 Renovations to existing Roanoke County-City of Salem Jail (450,000.00) Balance at May 22,2007 $6,234,044.55 $5,000,000 of this reserve is being used to upgrade Public Safety Radio System Maior County Capital Reserve (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Audited Balance at June 30, 2006 $679,628.00 2006-07 Capital Improvements Program-New County Garage (500,000.00) Appropriation from 2005-2006 Operations 869,992,00 Balance at May 22, 2007 $1,049,620,00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance " ;y Elmer C. Hodge {.. r/ County Administrator Approved By l(,--~ RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Audited Balance at June 30,2006 Amount $ 23,297.00 From 2006-2007 Original Budget 100,000.00 July 11, 2006 Appropriation to hire County Gypsy Moth Program, Inc. to serve as the Gypsy Moth Coordinator ($10,000.00) July 11, 2006 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison ($18,000.00) May 8, 2007 Appropriation for assessment for APCO negotiations ($2,310.80) May 8, 2007 Appropriation for primary for the Senate of Virginia 22nd District ($18,950.00) Balance at May 22,2007 $ 74,036.20 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C, Hodge ty County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NO, N--4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid-April 2007 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E, Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge [j-l County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors $ $ $ 4,732,177.93 Payroll 4/6/07 917,675.82 113,704.57 1,031,380.39 Payroll 4/20/07 957,907.16 122,357.06 1,080,264.22 Manual Checks 685.59 685.59 Voids Grand Total $ 6,844,508.13 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. '"' o o g '" ~ ~ 0.. Q ~ "a '5IJ .... ;; ~ ..:.Ii Q C ~ Q ~ ..... Q C C = Q U ::;; 0- N :;; 1.0 N :z: '" rz: .::; <II C Q ~ = 'i: c. Q .... C. C. -< 'C c <II <II Q,l ... C <II .... .c e = ... c r;ol Vi Q,l .... = ..... :a c Q,l C. >< r;ol ..... Q Q,l '; '0 Q,l .c ... ~ ~ ,Q,... ~ -g ~ ~ ~ :~~~~ Ii ~ ~ ; = >- ~ " ~ " c '" ::J " '" " " ;; ~ = ;:J " '" " E ~ ~ = E! Q :g e $ " " .. ... ~ " .:l o<J >. r-- o Q ~ ..,. o " '" " gf E ;; ..0 " c E ~ ::J '" o "CI <l.I "CI " ~ "CI = 'j;; <l.I c.., ... -= = :!: o - .. ; .. = "- 00 0- 0- 0-"'- .,ocr-: 00 00 r-- M 0- lr) Vi~O .,0<'1.,0 \0 <'I \0 0- 00 00 O'r-=-O' lr) 0- r-- 00 <'i r-- 00 lr) ",,"\0 or-..:~ "<tlr) ",,"oor-- or-: 0:: ",,".oM M r-- <'I "" \00000 <'I 00 00 NOO """ <'I 0- <'I r-- <'I <'1- " .. ... .E ~ :a " il ~ ~ M\O\O 00 0- 0- ..fr-:o lr) r-- 00 <'I 00 lr1~OO M<'IM q ~ ~ ." ::J = cr--oO Ot.r)~ r-...:o r-- r-- <'I t"").\O'D ~o 0-, 00 MOO...., cO "CI " ::J "- OJ .. .. " <l.I " g .:!l c:; 00 '8 -;a '0 'u -<E o o(l "0 &i o IJ:i -;a 'u a c:; ~ ,~ o(l -;a d ~ 5 ~ ~ u ~ ~ 0 ....Joiii = = .... "CI = " "- <'I ...., 00 00 00 000 r-- o 00 00 \0 \0 <'I 0.,0 r-- r-- r-- ..,. vi In '-C ~ - '" N 0, 00 "1 M 00 0, 00 00 \0. 0,' 00 00 """ M <'I o .., ..; - o "" 00 '" ~ 0, \0 \0 00 .,0 \0 r-- 0, 00 r--' <'I' ...., r-- 0, r-- ..,. ..; In '" ..; - - 00 <'I ot-; o "<t "<t """. In r-- ..; - "'l .., o --:. r-- lr) M ~r--..: M",," 00 ...c 00" MoO r-- r-- .0 '-C \0 r: o VJ. - - 00 \0 00 0\0 lr) 00 00 """ r-=-r-i" <'I t'f'l0... .... ~ '= "s ~ <( .... c .. e I; .... .. .. o CI -; .... .. c .. CI 1:: o 0- @- [/'J c;j 'u 'i3 ;::l en ..... 1:: .... ;::l ] 86 o Q - o <'I 00 00 <'I <'I 00 o - ..; r-- 0, '" <'I 0- M <'I 00 r--:~r---=~ r- 00 00 00 ~ ~ - <:> r-- ~ '" '-C ~~:~ 0, 00 OOV1Q Mv)....o.ocf ~V)""'"r---- v.... \0" 00 ...., In In .0 .., 00 o - t-;. ...., lr) lr) ",,"r--o-,"'l o\N<iM \0 \0 V '<l:. 0 r-- \0, N" t-"" Vi lr) <n r-- \0. \0 r-- ..,. ~v) M r-- ..; V "t - - 000000 t-;~o Nr-- 0 00 <n 0-, "'- <'I 0-_ 0\"...., 0",," """""" M In .... 00 ~ ..; ..,. M ...., <n r-- r- r- t- lrl ..,.:;V"l~d. vv<nv MOt-\O oo..ooo~ ",,"OOV<n "=t'..., N" r- V <:> o V In o "<1" .., N lrl N 0'\ 0 lr)CoOO o\<ir-:.,o ~<n~:z <i r-=- v- 0\" 0'1 ON 00 0" l"""l \.I:)-.::t <n ",' ";j 'u ;c = .., i: o U u If oj .... c:; f- .2 o(l = C ~ E ~ 0 e ]~~~ c-guC; W oj " a ~ ~ l3 '8 ....J~U-< Q Q M Q <'IM"<1" 000 0 0 r-f"l M M M 00 00 0 0 "<1" o ....; 00 000, Mr--oor-- r-'t:J"~r-I.r)M o\r-..:M~..oO 00"'00"'0000 M M ~ '-C "" - Q '" 0000 ",,"v V:V:~~ -...0 00 M M l(') 0 '1""""4.., "" v' <i "<1"r--lr)0- ~ \0 '1""""4~ "<1" "<1" o ~ 00 '" ~ "<1" r: M <'I <'I "':"': ...., ...., \0 00 M 00 -.Dr-=- <'I \0 V <'I r-i" 00 =! - .., 00 ..; In 00 0\0000'\00 ~:2~~~~ Nt-MM ~::::~ V '-C r-- ..; ~ r-- '" In "<1" ..; orA \0 lrl t-lr'lMO ,...)v-),..)...o 0-, _ "<t <n 0, 0 ~ r--: '-Dr. an "<1" o,v M <'I '-C '-C ~ Q In vi - In ..; M OOOlrlot- cqqt-;q"'l tr)lr)N-.::tOOOO N\OO\'V t- 0\... 0\ 0\... '-0 lr) 0"-... '7 ViONN [""-o-'I:j"O\OO\O\O v 000,'"'1.00"<1" .,;' r-i" M c ~ OS en .::! :i5 = =- Q)e;~ OJ 00 I:: .~ 8. ~ d) r:J'J ..... [/'JCi~ ~ '" I:: '" o <:> Q .., o '" ~ = ~ "td ~~ N~"","V"')\O 00000000 """""""<tv""",,,," 000'01010 M..J- <n <'I 000 <'1<'1 ~" r--. "<1" \0 r-- lr) <i""; <n 00 00"" ~ "<t 00 ...., r-i"<'i r-- "<1"'" r-:.,o 0-, 0 00 r-- o\"( ... 0. OIl 00 a ,2 g 8 g '.g ~ .So & ~ ~~c3 M '-C ..; r-- 0....,000<'1000 \Q\r) rt'1~0"10 ONe; 000 oor--r--o, r--c t"l ~ - - 00 "" o '-C ..; ('.1l1")('llliN ~,,!\Oqo ('f')OOrf')r-....: 000 00t- M0"10N\O \0" 0,' \0' N' 0\" M MO 0"" VI f'I') ~ --: - - M o - '-C o - OOlJlOOQ'\NNO r-r-MOOOOOO ....,<iNNr-:<io r-OOll") r- 0 \0<'1<'1 00 -.D 0\" ~' If"i' 0,' ",' "" <'I \0 v 00 <'I <'I r-- ('f') 00.., lI") 0\ ('OJ ~M'" \0 ~ .... '-C 00 "" r-- 0000000000 coqoooc 00000000 <n r--, 0-, .., - o '-C r--~ - "<1" ~ lI")Oll")t- co \0 oq'<J" "': 000 oOoV)~lF)OO N r- Vi 0'\ <'I, ::: ~ ~ r--<'I'" "<t\O<'I ~ ..; M o ~ - M ..; OOCvOOO ~~q:;;~~~ r-- \0 r-- 0, 0 0 0 """ '" <'I, v lr) 00, N" 0-.." N r-'" 0; ("0') 00 ('f')O\O f'l')l- lr) :' ",' ~ '" t = ~ I:: .~ t) :@ <( 00 '2 '8 "0 -< ,::! :is :I ~ -=.,s c;j oj '" ... :I::I: 'Ei .~ 5::C ~~ en '" OJ 'E '" [/'J ... rJJ dJ ~ dJ > S U .;:;; 00 "~ 5 '~ Jlil-< Cd ~.~ 'g g ~ [/'JU=- o Q ..,. Q ('f')v 1.(")\0 t-oo 00000000 lI") lI") lI") lI") lI") lr) lJI 00000000 00 00 00 .,..; 0 00 0, -.D 00 I:: .2 ~ N '8 oj OIl ~o oj '" u ~ ~ .~ .2 Jl .~ c;j ~ "g ..!3r.n ((-5 o .., o ~ o .., ..; ~ oo~ - 0\ "'l "<1" '-C vi - ..,.~ ~ ~ N - o o o IT) r-- ~ 00 IT) ..; IT) r-- r: '-C :J- ..,. ~ =' o .... ..r IT) .... ..; - .. .. .:! Ol ~ ~ I; os 05 -; .. ::c o o In o <Ii ..c ... M r-- \0 0 0- M \0 OC '<t \0 0- on 0 0 0 .... on ... r-- ';;l "CI e " 't "1 0<:: 0<:: .., t-; '<t ~ '" t-; ~ '<t 0\ 0 ~ ~ or. N "! ... QCl N <- Q " ::> ~ OJ) N N ~ on ~ ..t 0- N 00 00 00 0; 0 Q ..t M .,; N ~ <Ii .. . "CI r-- 00 on r-- \0 M 00 0- r-- N '<t r-- 0- on .... on 00 III '" <:> Co " <:> '" " ... .. ::> <:! ~ ell .. ... oll .. <- <Ii Vi ;.. "CI " <Ii 0 r-- on N 00 ~ 0 0 00 on on r-- 0 0 0 or. '<t 0- .., ... " '" gp <Ii 0\ 0\ 0 ~ N N 0 III ~ t-; 0 0 0 0 0 \0 r-- '<t '<t ;; ..c r-: ...0 0; ~ 0 0; ~ r-= ..t 00 0 r-: 0 ~ 00 r-: ~ ....; a. q e <Ii M M M .. '<t r-- 00 .... 0- M 00 N on \0 \0 r-- 0 0- N r-- r-- ~ '" '" ::> c: .. .. r-- r-- on ... 0 \0 ~ 0- N, 00 0- N 0 N '<t 0 M on OC '" c: -; 00 ~ -i' ~ N -i' ...-) 0 r--' .,; .,; .,; 00 ...; .,; 00 ~ 0 <Ii c: ell '<t M 0 '<t \0 0 ... '<t .... 0- on 0- 00 0- N 0 .., ... ;, N, '<t N o-~ M III 0, 00 r-- 00 M '<t r-- 0- ... -i' vi vi vi ~ .... ... M .., '" <Ii .. 0 0 on II'> 0- N 0- 0 0 N on on M 0 0 0 II'> \0 '<t 0 N c: :; .. ~ t-; r-- 0 '<t ~ r-- t-; 0 III 0- N 0- 0<:: 0 0 0 0- M 0<:: N N '" 0 00 Q 0 N 0 ...0 00 0 0 0 r-= r-: d- d- '" ..c .. r-- N ~ .: e Q 0 .., N \0 M 0 N 00 M 0- N 0 .., N '" r-- .., :;; ::> ~ ~ O. '<t 00. 0-. '"'l N, .., 00 N r-- O. O~ 0 r-- r-- 0- " .. ~ '" M 0 r-- "<t 0- r-- ~ 0-' r-: 0-' ~ '" ~ 00 -i' N' 0 c: '" ::0 = II'> 0 0- <Ii ... r-- \0 '" M '" 0 ~ ~ \0 0- '" r-- N Co .. III "l .., ... .., " oll <Ii 0, N iii \0 '" "<t N. '" ...; O. 0, iii oe Iiil ;.. M N ... M M N '<t '<t ... ... '" = 0 <Ii ~ .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... <'ll OJ) c: '<l: 0 0 '<t ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .. ...0 0 r-= 0 0 0 d- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Q ..c OJ;; c: '" ~ 0- :;; ..c \0 M 0- 0 0 '<t ~ c: e ~ N .., M f"'l 00 0 r-- ~ ::> r-: N ~ oe 10. .. ~ 0 " r-- ~ ~ :; ... O. < ~ 0 <>l ~ '<t 0 'c = '511 <'ll '" 10. ClJ ;; .... = ClJ- <>l "0 ... ~ ..:Ii 10. "0 M N 0 II'> a-, '<t 0 '<t \0 a-, 0 M 0 0 0 00 r-- \0 .., '<t Q ,Q c .... .: r-- ~ 0 00 0- 0- ~ 0 0 "1 t-; M 0<:: 0 0 0 ~ \0 ~ ~ 00 = e '-l := :;; ..t ~ 0 d- o-: 0 ...0 0 r-= '" '" 00 0 0 0 ... 00 M ... ....; <'ll = "0 " c: \0 \0 N 0 r-- '" .., '" N r-- N 00 M "<t OC .., Q .... '" <Ii 00, '<t "l. N 0 ~ '<t r--, '" r-- ... 0, "<to '<t 0 .;:: " Co 00' 00' ...-) .,; vi r--' ...-) a: N' vi 0 ~ = ::; .. 0 M M r.l ... ... "<t r-- N 00 '" '<t 00 0- 0 0- 0 0- '- Il. M N \Q ... N on ~ \0 N "" r-- Q ~ ;: ~ C ClJ C 10. '" = = ::E = .... Q :a U = 0 ClJ ... ~ ... ~ r.l ;: '- .. <Ii 0 r-- 0 r-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M .., .., '" OJ) 00 \0 0 '<t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 \0 \Q \Q 0 '"' "CI 00 r-: 00 ~ M Q ..t 0 0 0 r-: 0 ~ ...0 0-: iii N ClJ ::> '" M :; ell "<t 00 0 '<t N 0- N II'> M 0 \0 0 0 0- N .... 0 \0 r-- .., '" M \0 II'> 0<- '" '" N .... O. N 0 0 N, '<t ... '<to N \Q \Q~ ~ 0 .,; r-: ~ ~ ~ N 00 0 ~. '" ",' 0 <:) '" 00 iii M ...-) vi .... ClJ 00 N 0<- 0 0<- 0<- \0 0 r-- \0 M \0 0 0- 00 II'> 0 M .., 0 .c N \0 '<t '<t 0<- \0 ~ "<to \0 t-:. "'i '<t '<to ~ "l. .... ..f' N r: .... "<to ;:!: ... 0-' N .... 00 rJ:i N r-- 00 ~ ~ Oi '; i- '" "0 I: 10. " E I- :; == '-' E ClJ Q. U Il) E g. ~ E u o(l 'E ~ c u Ol) 0 o:l ;; -; c 2 Il) <l Il) U c == 0 A.. r.n ... o:l d) ~ c c c ClJ ~ ~ u d) ;:l "S 01 0 d) o:l Q ;.a Il) c E 0 0 -= ~ E E o:d c o:l "E .;;; p -0 0 u 0 C .... Ol) ~ ~ '" c "E ~ <;; 10. '" '" 0 Il) d) c c ..9 'a tE >. III 01 l- I- '" E d) o:l 'L: ~ ~ 'iij c:.:: ';:: >< .....l :> <;; ~ 10. ..Q Il) :l Il) d) -0 d) '" '" ~ "0 Il) U .,r 0 IJ.l > S S e: '" '" "0 - III d) Q e: e: '" .. N Il) Il) E :l gj <;; E E c u 'C ..:.: Il) C1 e: E co 0 '6 >. .: c = d) C 10. o:d .~ .S Il) Il) Il) u 'C fo- f0- Ol '"' 0::: IJ.l 01 0 e: 0 10. U "S u Il) > e: .~ .. Q. :z: OJ o:d Q~ ~ Ol) <;; 'S ll) o:l ..::J U Il) 0 "0 "0 f0- e: .. .n SU OJ Il) Ol) .. e: e: l- ';:: d) 0 'C OJ 0::: .= Q. <E <2 ... '" ~ E Q. ~ Il) '" Q. I: -"i 0 e: e: "E 0 Q. .- ~ .a I: '" '" ... .n- o:l 0 0 E .::S >< o:l 0 Il) .. 0 '-' o:l .~ ;:l 0 0 u 0 0 ~ o:l Il) 0 c 0 ] ] 0 A.. ...l U \Q ii: u IJ.l U r-- IJ.l Q fo- 0::: U ::J 00 0- ~ = 0 0 0 0 a. ~ ~ c. '" "0 N M N M '" N M "<t \Q r-- 00 N '" N 1:: N I: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ = \0 \0 \0 r-- r-- r-- r-- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a-, a-, w.. '"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:!:! ..c ~ .. "C 8 Q Q ~ '"' " " ;f!. .. 0 S .. .- .. 0 C>. " "C t.! .. ... "" .. " '"' " "" ~ c:l Vi .. oll ... ~ B ~ ~ 0- 23 ..c 8 .. .- " " .- " " -; .. " <ll ~ " .... ~ " " f .:!:! .. ..c .. .a 8 Q :;; " ~ " . .. " ... oll " .. ... '" C Q 'C .. <I ell 0/) " 'C " " .. =- '6 ..c Q " I: lo. r-- E " =- e: . ... f;JJ '" ::; ... Il. "" Q "r ,C -= '" C lo. C ::s '" ::s .... ~ 0 ;e; U c ~ '" =- > 0 '"' ~ !'2 0 3 =: ...- 0 '" 0 N E -i:i -i:i g rl ~ ~ '" 0 0 Jj 0.. uJ UJ 1:: .c ~ "" " ;; 8 0 'C 0 '6 C '" ::1 e 0 " ~ .. 0 UJ ~ 0- - ~ ,:! ~ -; ii: ~ ... ] '" c '" ii: 0 ::E 0 0- ;:: '" '<l <n >C N 'C Z N C Ii: .;,: :> ~ c- o o <::! Si .. .. l 0 ell '= .~ .. :; as" ..:.:: Q c ell Q ~ ... Q Co C ::I Q U ::E 0- o :;:: 9. ~ ~ ... '" ~ ::I C .. .. .. ~ 'i' ::I ... ... < "0 C ell "0 .. ... ell e ~ '" ~ ... Q ... C ~ e ~ ... ell ... 00 i ~ 'Q Q '" '" S ~ ~ ~ i ~ : ~ ;>0 ... '" .!:l '" OJ OJ '" C .. " c OJ =- CC '" "OJ Q '" S ~ .. c " '" '" ;> ;>0 ~ I"- Q Q ~ ~ Q "' .... '" :a E = ~ C> '" ~ ~ "0 '" "0 C I'l "0 co .;: '" Cl. .c C co ~ Q - '" -= .. co '" f'(-5 ~~ O~~N~~OO~O~O~~~~OO~O~OOOO~~~~O~~~O~~OOO ~~~~N~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~oo~o~ OO~OOOO~u,N~ ~~OONOOOOOOO~~NOOO ~oo~o N N V N ~ ~ V OOOO"1f"'\l I"-I"-V~O NoOr-.:'ON^ I"- I"- 0> on 00\ -.D-.i ....., N on~.....,"''''1"- -.::j"r"')vOO"1lf) ~<;,~~~ ~^ """v ",ooN I"- o~v~C"") l,f) lflN N '" 00 N 00 V "'. or, 0 -.ir-.:' ....., 00 00 or, ;;tN o oo~ N ....., ("f")"'=1"","O\\Otn\OC""') C""') NOO CJ'o..or-t.r)ov0"10v If)OO r-~ C1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0" :;r ~ ~n ;} ~~ ~"' OO",ooNoo~I"-"""1"- ono ;:}~ ;:",~~",r-("f")N",-.::tV)~ <.0 on or, v ~ on <.O^ -.i M V ("f"l", v" v M 0\ -.i v ....., ~ 0 I"- or, 0\ ..0 or, 0 0:: v^ 0 ~ M 0\ M o-.M~ 000 ....., ....., .oN N Or"')ON ...0 0"1 C""')OO ~:-.....,~ on N rAO"1"'=:j-lf) NVooO\ 00 N <.O^ 0\' '" '" N 0\ I"- or,or, oh 0., 0\ 0. t.rJ...o V r"l.\01.,Q t-("f') "ON.....,I"-.~ r-.:' -.6 0 V N' 1"-' NovooNO """-.01"- 00 0\ I"-^ -.o^ <.0 I"- 00 0\ 0\ <.0 ~ -.D-.i I"- N OOVOoo N <.00\ I"- "1- r-~ -.i 0 o~ l"- f"')" rr) 00 I"- 0\ ~ ....., :;;. ~ ~^ 00\00 V N onO\v <.0 N I"- N ....., an" ~ ...0 0\ <.0 <.0 00 :" 00" v <=> N N <.0 ....., N 0\ 00 00 eJ',lf)\Ot""l 1,,(")"l'1 t-O\ 0 ood~~o <.0 "" <=> on~ vo...or-an C"") ~ ONvlf)OOO~O"1r- O"1vO"1NOoovr-Olf)~r"') N '\OvOONN ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~d~~~ C""') C""')OO If)C''''') \0 ("f")~lf)r-N NN C""') vN - '" Qll "0 .. cc onOOOOONOOOOOOO NOOOOOvooooooo V 0 0 0 or, 0 Nor, 0 O^O 000 ~.OOOr-"O"oOo-,"Olf) 0000 N g ~ ~ C""') ~ g ~,,~,,~,,~~ ~~"' -.:i r-: N" 00'" r-: If) C""') I"- N "0 C .. '" OJ .. '" C ... ~ <1) 0- o .... <1) ~ ~ ~ <= ~P:)~ f-o e '" ~.e8~ ~ &8.5 ~ 2 'E o(j E ~ Q) (f.l (f.l Cd rfJ .2 iJ.l <= II ,<::: _ 0 ;.::: << <Ll oj ;:::if-o ~ ~ E~ <Ll E oj ~ g ~...J >< oj >< f-o oj ~~ ~ = 5 8 ~;.:J <1) '" e ~ iil ,S <= '" o ;::l UP:) ~ ~ ~ <Ll ~o(j ~ ~ ~ ,51 ~ (;j ;J] >< <Ll II ro U ll.) f-o:.=~ ~ lI.) C :.=>0 '" <= oj ~ <Il <1) >< OJ f-o E >< 0 OJ 0 f-o.,.: ~ d3 ~ '0 ,~ ~ ...Jo(j ~- 3 ~ ~::r: 000 01"-0 00000000 coo -.o~or, l.Or-:an 0011') ONO\O\-.:::ttn N N OooooNMOoo o I.QOlf)("'f')l()N or) 1"-. o^ 1"-. ":. v^ -Do("'t")[--"'...... l,f) CJ'..ONO 0000 '-0 \0 f"t") \0", ("'f') v^ M OOVOO o 0 Q"I, 00 o co <.0 N on 0:: N ooon lO M l()"' t-" iJ o o ~ -0 ~ OJ go ~ t; i::i of-o ~ t ~6 ;>.. ;>..t:: <1) <1) ~ 0- o 2 '" ~ ~ <Ll ... ... ~ ~ ~ 0 0 3bij ~~~d.l~ ~ <= ~ ~;~ ;:Je :;; ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 0 2 oP:) o;,&<.l::~ U,,=, ~O-"='~~ ~ a ~ 0 8 ~ ~ ~ E-oE -"'i0",55 ~j;&~~~~~ E <1) < ~ 'E ;B ~ ~ ~ ~~'"2~o I-< I-< :L-. 0 U ~~.a~-o Vltnr.J)~~ ~~~~~ OJ ~ ,5 ~ 8 oo~i~ c; ~ ~ II '" '" '0: ~ 0 o <Ll [/J ~~o(j "ed UJ lI.) u"'8~ C ~ Q) z~~ M ~ ~ 0 ~N I"- ~ or, tlll <1) 1;; 'i <Ll 'E <Ll <Ll [/J 1;; Ul -6 :.;: ~ ,51 1;; II ;::l -0 r..r.l o ",,0\0\ <"l ..". 00 -.DoOr-.:' NO"" "" ..". "" N^ o N ~ o N N. N "" <Il o <1) '0 >< ~ ~ r-oor-o on ~ <=> :~.N.~ r"'-a.nNv <.0 0\ I"- 1""')" N" ~ O\^ I"- ~ "" N N 0:: v 1"-0-,0-,00 ""'" v ("'t") 0 N <.0 N. M V v.... 00 0'1'" Qt.;) 0 O<.OonvN Or:.. 0.- N", -.D1""l N -0 :.;: ~ ] 'E 'g ~ tlll- B '8 OJ 0 U[/J *o(j C7i ~ ~ ~ ..c:a; o~ '" OIl ~ -0:2 :.;: 'S P:) -.l-o .~ 8 ~-g ~ oj OJ .....l U'- .... 0 .... ~ ~ ~ o~o '" <Ll II "" ;::l o [/J OIl ~ '0 I: OJ <= t.i: o N("'f')VO N("'t")~l()~r-OO~O N~~OO~O NOOQ \00 v~("'t")OI.QON NNNNN<"l<"l<"lNN""""""MI""lMMVVVVor,or,or,~<.O~..oI"-OOOO"'o-, 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 N <- 0 0 !:::' Si '" M 0; .. ... c-; Q .. ., ~ 0 ~ ::I ~ ~ ~ = bjl Q\ ~ ~ .. c "C "" .. ~ .. ::I .. c:: .. =:l '" .. .... "C Q\ .. M .t:l .. 0 -; " "T^ .. = M .. .. "T = -; ~ =:l ~ c-; " \0 Q M .. ~ ~ .. ::I 0 .. = 0 .. .. ..,f .. .. .... &! '" <oj t- = 0 = := <oj .. "T .. !O! >. .. 0 .. "T :2 ::I c-; ~ = -.0 ell 0 ... '" "2 .. 0 -; ., &! M "~ = ~ .. ..... ;; '" <( "C '" i ~ "C = = 0 ell r.:l = ~ "Cl ell .. ., 0 ..... 'C ~ ell ~ ... e .I:l 0 ".C ... 0 '" - c-; f;I;l Q '" 0 = ... :; bjl '<t "Cl 0 = 0 ::I 0 ..... 0 =:l '<t U = - '<t .. ..,f e .. .. :: ... .. ell ... Q [IJ ... "C C ::I ... ';j l; = '" I.) <:> ~ <:> ~ ... E ;:;: "C '" C ... 0- ::I f-o 0 "" 9. ... '" Q N ;Z ti: ~ M Q\ 0 8 ~ C:: on .. co OJ: ~ .... If) .. ~ Q " '; ,:; ~ ~ oS = ~ .. If) g' ;; .. 0 -c '" Cl .. .. .. " co .. '" =:I .. ~ .. ;.. -c r-- .. "'" .1:1 .. OC> 'i ..... ...r .. = ~ .. co Q = 'OJ ...r ;;l =:I ~ .. If) OJ: ~ Q r-- '" .,s oS .. " "'" .. = N co .. or> .. .. ;.. .. ~ ~ '" "" r-- = c ~ "" 0 ~ Q ;.. ~ ... .. co "" .... :c " ~ ~ = ,..; 0:1 0 ;: .. '8 .. OC> -; ~ .. a-, 'Q = ~ ~ r: "'" .... ~ OJ < -c .. ~ "c:l -c .:.: c = Q 0:1 "" C "c:l ." 0:1 "" ~ Q .... 'C ~ 0:1 .. .5 Il. ... ..c Q .... ;: .0 '" - "'" f;ol ~ .. "'" c ... ~ .. ~ = ." Q " 0 Q .... Q =:I U C - "'" "" .,s e .. co "" ~ - .... 0:1 .. .... ~ <FJ ~ "' 'i '; ... ." = co .. r.: s 0 r-- ." .... 0 = 0 ;,0 0 " 0 "i "" ] ;; 1 'i ~ .. " .. U.J C " = U.J U.J .. -" ~ 1!' r.: " 8 0 'i5 ::; " c ] 0 U.J Cl. ~ Q ~ ;: u: '" ~ ::>: ." ] "- = u: 0 " ..., '? ~ '" 0 Z N s:: .. /'(-(p PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER BUILDING PROJECT BUDGET REPORT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Northrop-Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Contingency 12/03/04 Opening Balance $ 26,030,769 $ 780,817 01127/05 Change Order (001) 21 ,065 (21,065) 01/27/05 Change Order (002) * 53,835 01/28/05 Progress Payment #1 (1,456,157) 02/24/05 Progress Payment #2 (403,222) 03/24/05 Progress Payment #3 (375,678) 05/13/05 Progress Payment #4 (855,272) 06/10/05 Progress Payment #5 (401,210) 06/20/05 Change Order (003) - Establish Guaranteed Maximum Price (51,387) 51,387 06/28/05 Change Order (004) - Foundation change 319,034 (319,034) 07/14/05 Progress Payment #6 (378,417) 07/27/05 Progress Payment #7 (445,669) 08/10/05 Progress Payment #8 (759,513) 08/23/05 Change Order (005) - Sewer Line Replacement 124,407 ( 124,407) 10/05/05 Progress Payment #9 (77 4,442) 10/13/05 Change Order (006) - Convert Citations and Warrants Databases no cost 10/20/05 Progress Payment #10 (664,909) 12/08/05 Progress Payment #11 (1,196,297) 12/08/05 Change Order (007) - Minor Changes to Radio Equipment no cost 12/08/05 Change Order (008) - Additional conduits for redundant 911 feed no cost Northrop-Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Contingency 12/08/05 Change Order (009) - Regrading slope from road cut south side of Cove Road 3,737 (3,737) 12/08/05 Change Order (010) - Coordination of sewer line with Glen Cove School water line no cost 12/28/05 Progress Payment #12 (1,130,054) 01/03/06 Change Order (011) - Refrigerated storage for evidence storage 24,621 (24,621 ) 01/20/06 Change Order (012) - Modifications to voice radio transition plan (cost offset by E911 funds) 84,060 02/02/06 Progress Payment #13 (1,099,134) 03/09/06 Progress Payment #14 (1,164,468) 04/05/06 Progress Payment #15 (1,464,883) 04/18/06 Change Order (013) - Extension of 8" Fire Service Line to rear property line no cos t 04/20/06 Progress Payment #16 (1,671,792) 06/01/06 Progress Payment #17 (1,307,330) 06/15/06 Progress Payment #18 (1,902,683) 06/21/06 Change Order (014) - Modifications to IT Carpet Squares, DAC ES Cards & Console Upgrades 4,823 (4,823) 06/21/06 Change Order (015) - Utility/Permit Allowance for WVWA new Fire Hydrang Fee no cost 07/20/06 Change Order (016) - Additional security features and office space addition to Police Evidence Storage area 31,723 (31,723) 07/20/06 Change Order (017) - Addition of EIFS material to roof screens for improved appearance and additional electrical boxes in Police Polygraph area 49,085 (49,085) 07/27/06 Progress Payment #19 (1,592,012) Northrop-Grumman Date Description Contract Amount Contingency 09/13/06 Change Order (018) - Increase in size and structural support for Police records section, addition of plumbing in Police forensics section, deletion of transformer structure and additional WAN links for communications redundancy 8,090 (8,090) 09/28/06 Progress Payment #20 (1,110,618) 1 0/26/06 Progress Payment #21 (1,451,867) 11/30/06 Progress Payment #22 (1,579,614) 12/14/06 Progress Payment #23 (556,132) 01/08/07 Change Order (019) - Minor changes to wiring, outlets, fencing, landscaping, signage, etc. no cost 01/08/07 Change Order (020) - Changes to access control system to allow better remote operations from inside the building and at the vehicle gates 12,926 (12,926) 01/25/07 Progress Payment #24 (1,117,716) 03/15/07 Progress Payment #25 (984,582) Balance at May 22, 2007 $ 873,117 $ 232,693 * The funds to be used for change order #002 were taken from departmental E911 funds. Submitted By, Dan O'Donnell Asst. County Administrator Approved By, Elmer Hodge County Administrator ty-7 10 10 ;::- 'It I'-- .... .... - I'-- - ....... a - C'") to C'") co C'") a (/) (/) (/) C'") (/) N to (/) N +-' 0 0 0 0 0 e a co C'") a 'It_ t) t) t) I'-- t) to a t) co ::J ....... C'") ....... 0) 'It 0 0 0 C'") 0 'It 'It 0 'It 0 N 10 10 ....... N c: c: c: c: N co c: E - C'") <( fh VI '0 c: Q) E ::J ..... ..... ctl Q) ....... Q) ~ - ....... (/) "0 >- Q) 0) 0 CI) c: W (/) en c: 0 ..... >- 0 0 <C '0 Q) .0 0 <C ctl - .... 0 0 ctl Q) ~ ..... 0 0::: == ~ a> == en "0 '0 Q) (/) Q) "0 0 L- Q) > '0 a .... c: c: 0 - ..... I- ctl ..... 0 0 ..r::: en ctl U a> Q5 EL .E :;::; 0 t) 0 0 en ..... ctl ..... CI) .s Q) w - '0 ~ (/) t) 0 - CI) e en Q) t;:: '0 Q) c: 'ii) W ...., 0 c: Q. '(3 Q) Q) n:l VI (/) > E ctl 0 c:( ..c 0 ctl ctl Q) ~ '0 0 c.. en 0 0 '0 .0 a. 'ii) 0 0 en <C ~ 0 Q) e z '0 <C c: t) ctl (/) ....... 0 c: 0 ..... Q) ::J - ....... ..r::: c: 0::: .Q t) a. 0 - 0 ..... 'C .!E ctl - 0) - Q) (!) ctl 0.. 0 c: ::J Q) :t::: ctl en (!) l- e Q5 '0 ....... 0 Q) - 0 a en Q) Q) ~ ..... E (/) (/) E c: (/) rn c: ..... ~ 0 0::: '0 Q) ctl ctl c: Z ctl 0) ::J ot::' - a. "'5 ..r::: ..... ctl :::i ctl 0 > +- w c: c: '0 .... ..... ::J c: E 0 ctl ::J c: t) '3 0 - c- O 0 ~ (/) - Q) a. 'C (ij 'x ..... ..... c- ::J CI) .Q (/) - Q) ..... '0 t) ...J t) c: Q) - 0 ctl W '0 Q) W W c: ctl .... == ctl Q) '0 .~ - I/) :> ~ Q) ~ 3: ~ 0 c: t) ctl Q) :J ~ ~ a> Q) Q) 0 ..... ..... Q) a. 0 '0 Q) E ::J (/) '0 ..... ..... c: ..... 0 (/) '0 '0 .E E Q) Q) Q) CI) ctl m ~ c: -e c:( Q) c: (/) 0 (/) LL W 0 > 0 ~ :;::; c: c: - ::J Q) 0 ctl '0 ctl ctl 0 '0 a. ..... Q) 0 0 I- ~ == ~ ctl '0 (/) c: 0 ..r::: .... 00 .... E (/) +:: Q) 0 (/) ~ ::J c: 0 c: - en ..... (/) Z 0 0 Q) 0 ::J Q) ctl rn t) (/) 0 c: 0 c: Q) ..... (9 :t::: c: 0 '0 W .~ > ..... .E :5 rn +:: - 0 0 u. ..... 0 ctl (ij c: ctl W Q) :;::; +:: U 0 ~ en '0 ..r::: Q) ..r::: .5 ctl (/) ctl 0 ctl ..... .!!1 '0 -e c: c: Q) rn (!) ctl t) t) '0 t) 'Ci) t) N Q) ::c Q) Q) 0 ~ '0 rn ~ :-E a. ~ Z >- I - S (/) ~ > ..... E ..... c: c: ::J ..!!1 ctl .:; a. c: 0 '0 rn 0 ctl '0 Q) '0 c:( I- (9 .... .5 0 x 0 Q) (/) Q) Q) 0 '0 Q) 0 ..r::: W J: Z to 0 W 0::: 0::: 0 ~ <C 0::: 0 0 ~ w ~ U. U :J c:( 0 en u u ...J "0 a> 10 10 10 10 m > 10 10 10 10 a a a a to :J 0 a a a a a a a to a L- a a 10 10 a a N N N N a a to a. N N a a a N a N to a a a N co co co co N a a <( I'-- I'-- C'") a a N N C'") ..... ..... ..... ..... N N N N ~ ~ a co N ..... .0 .0 .0 .0 ~ ~ ..... +-' - <U E E E E co n:l ctl ctl N N (/) .0 ctl ctl N 0 ::J ::J .0 E ::J Z L- a> ..... N C'") 'It 10 to I'-- co 0) a ..... N C'") 'It "0 a a a a a a a a a ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... L- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a> e n:l ..c 0 ..... t"') It) 0 ..... to C'> rJ) C"J 00 C'> rJ) C"J ...... .- 0 0 c l) I'- 0 0 l) C'> 0 :::J 0 ...... C'> 00 0 C"J to 0 e t"') 'V e ...... 00 E to <( ER- e E a> 0 l) "0 ~ >- 0 l) L- e e "0 ...... a> ro "0 e rJ) "0 ro ro U e .::; a> L- "0 ..... .Q l) C a> e a> 3: W e E ::J ..... a> a> ro 0 L- "0 a> ~ e L- :;:; .E a> m a> .!::! ro l) L- ro c.. <( 0 a> a> rJ) rJ) e 0 ~ c.. rJ) e .Ql ll. c.. ro e a> ro rJ) L- 0 rJ) ..... 0 ro "E ..... :;:; 0 ..... "0 ...... ro m E a> 0 0 .... e a> L- l) .!::! e a> Q) L- 0 > ro a> e e '0.. L- '0 .E :..e 0 ..c L- 0 ::J ro L- L- .... a> "0 c.. c.. a> .~ E l) a> 0 "0 E ro .!::! rJ) == l) ro L- a; E "0 a> rJ) Q) e m "5 "0 0 e ..c a> ro a> L- ..... 0 >- ll. l) ~ ro 3: l) "5 C 3: c ro ...... L- L- m ro .Q c.. rJ) ll. .E 0 0 cii .Q a> ~ <( rJ) e :;:; ...... ro a> e :"Q U a> 1:: l) rJ) ..... a> a> .!::! 0 a> .::.:. '0 0 ..c - E l) L- "5 c.. rJ) ~ e ..... a> 0 ~ l) ~ L- rJ) ll. c.. rJ) E > c a> 0 ...... ::J l) Z a> a> 0 ll. "0 0 e rJ) '(ii <( rJ) 00 -5 :;::::; -- e 0 ro e :s: Q) .~ ro L- rJ) ~ :;:::; >- ..... a> L- rJ) ro 'C rJ) 0 >< ::J .E ro ::J (,) S a> - 0 - 0 "5 "0 a> l) e L- 1Il L- ro ..c ::J a> ..... e Q) E a> ::J 'C .... l) 0 m e ro LL iii ro ..... ;.E C 0 e a> VI "5 0 m a> a> ..... l) "0 'C l) C ...... rJ) ...... ro 'C "0 ll. "0 .~ rJ) rJ) ::> ~ E t5 C ro rJ) ;g "0 ro .E .8 'C ro CJ) a> "0 a> ::J C - a> l) ::J C ::J a> LL a; m e rJ) l) ..c ro l) L- .~ C ro ...... ro a> ro a> L- a> W ro rJ) B ...... "0 a> m -5 0 >- VI a> ...... C .E E .... C 0 m 0 ::J ..... e I ro ro 0 :B ::J - ro rJ) a> .Q a> l) ..c a> C L- C "0 rJ) a. ::J l) a> "0 iii .: ~ .8 0 "0 ro .... m '(ii :B ...... - .... C l) LL CJ) ro a> 0 rJ) 0 C 0 "0 "0 L- e ro "0 "0 l) ..c <( <( <( C ~ U '0 to 0 Q) 0 > C"J I'- I'- 0 .... to t"') 0 0 0 to to 0 0 0 0 0 C"J C"J <( 0 0 .... C"J C"J C"J a> 00 00 Q) ..c .- ...... 0 0 E ~ ~ ro C"J C"J C"J a> CO CO 0 a> ..... ::J ::J C ~ ~ c.. C C ::J ::J ::J a> CO CO .., .., .., CJ) .., .., .... L- Q) 0 ..Cl I'- ..... ro E 0 .... 0 ..... :::J C"J .~ .... Z e 0 ..... .... C"J E ro C"J .... Q) ..... It) to I'- 00 C'> 0 ~ .~ '0 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... C"J >- .... ro :>,a; :>, a> .E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ >- CO e ..... CO mE Q) ...... "0 e C "0"0 0 0 ::J "0 VI a> o 0 a> 0<( c ..... I>- ro ."t:: - U > ro E o . e .... ..... ~ ro a> C ..c Coo c..E ::J U 0 ::J ro rJ) c.. _ 0 r- CJ) 0<( <(wu ACTION NO. ITEM NO. rp-\ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss stormwater management ordinance and design standards SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir Deputy Director of Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The work session will be an opportunity for Community Development staff to review the new stormwater management ordinance which addresses water quality issues associated with the mandated federal Clean Water Act regulations. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish minimum stormwater management requirements and controls to protect properties; and safeguard the general health; safety; and, welfare of county residents, Staff will present an overview of the ordinance and design manual, as well as the impacts to County landowners, the development community, and County staff, Staff briefed the Planning Commission on the stormwater management ordinance on April 17, 2007, and received very constructive feedback. This feedback will be shared with the Board at the work session and a copy of the minutes is attached for reference. A draft of the ordinance and the design manual will be shared with the Board during the work session. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors discuss the ordinance and authorize scheduling a public hearing to adopt the ordinance. 2 Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Staff Present: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES - April 17, 2007 Mr. Rodney McNeil Mr. AI Thomason Ms. Martha Hooker Mr. Steve Azar Mr. Gary Jarrell Mr. Philip Thompson Mr. Tarek Moneir Mr. George Simpson Mr. Butch Workman Ms, Kafi Nophlin Mr. David Holladay Ms. Megan Cronise Mr. Tim Beard Ms. Susan Carter, Recording Secretary WORK SESSION: Session opened at 6:00 p.m. by Mr. McNeil. Approval of AQenda Mr. Azar moved to approve the agenda. Motion passed 4-0. Discussion of Mount Pleasant Community Plan Survey Results Mr. Thompson provided a powerpoint presentation regarding results of the survey_ Staff explained landuse designations. Ms. Cronise stated approximately 15% of the surveys were returned, Mr. Thompson reviewed the results. Mr. McNeil inquired about citizen interest in developing the land. Mr. Thompson discussed responses received from the citizens. He discussed the importance of targeting growth to appropriate areas. Mr. McNeil expressed concern regarding the implementation of an overlay district. Mr. Azar inquired as to the amount of road frontage available on Route 116. Ms. Cronise discussed road frontage and commercial frontage on Route 116, Mr. Azar inquired about utilities and possible retail development. Ms. Cronise discussed citizen desires. Update on the Proposed Stormwater ManaQement Ordinance Mr. Moneir discussed priorities of stormwater management. He also discussed environmental issues. He stated the ordinance is scheduled to be adopted by the end of 2007. Mr. Simpson discussed the many aspects of the ordinance through a powerpoint presentation. He provided background information regarding the development of the ordinance. He stated its purpose is to mitigate issues. He stated the existing ordinance does not address quality of water. He provided a brief history of 1 the Clean Water Act. He stated Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and the Town of Vinton are working jointly on the development of the ordinance. He stated under federal requirement, each locality would be responsible to inspect and enforce the ordinance. Mr. Moneir noted more staff members will be needed. Mr. Simpson discussed erosion and sediment issues. Mr. McNeil inquired about private property access. Mr. Simpson explained this will be covered by the ordinance, Mr. Azar inquired about existing developments. Mr. Simpson stated existing developments would be exempt unless major changes are made to the property. He discussed Best Management Practices (8MP). He stated the county attorney will be closely involved, He stated the ordinance is designed to address issues in higher density areas. He discussed various retention pond designs. He discussed requirements and maintenance of the ponds. Ms. Nophlin explained how bioretension ponds function. Mr. McNeil inquired about enforcement for maintenance of ponds by the homeowners association. Mr. Mahoney discussed this issue, Mr. McNeil expressed concern regarding lack of enforcement. Mr. Simpson stated enforcement often falls to the locality, Mr. McNeil suggested creating a homeowners association ordinance, Mr, Mahoney explained covenants applied to developments usually expire within a specific number of years. Mr, Azar inquired about the life expectancy of the ponds. Mr. Simpson explained. Mr. Azar suggested holding the developers responsible for maintenance instead of the homeowners' associations. Mr. Mahoney discussed some of the legal aspects regarding responsibility for maintenance. He stated the developer would most likely pass the cost over to the property buyers, Mr. Azar suggested applying a long-term bond. Ms, Hooker noted implementation of the ordinance has been mandated. Mr. Simpson discussed impacts. He discussed methods other localities use to fund the changes, Mr, Azar expressed concern regarding funding being the responsibility of taxpayers. Mr. Simpson and Mr. Mahoney explained possible options. Mr. Simpson noted many policy decisions still need to be made. Mr. Thompson noted the ordinance has been designed in order to improve water quality for the entire county. Ms. Cronise inquired about retro-fitting existing structures; Mr. Holladay inquired about non-development of property. Mr. Simpson discussed these aspects. Mr. Moneir reiterated that the ordinance has been mandated and more staff will be needed for implementation. Mr. McNeil inquired about funding for salaries of additional employees needed, Mr. Simpson noted funding will not be received from the state. Mr. Mahoney discussed various funding methods. Mr. Azar stated the fee should be fair and equitable. Mr. McNeil requested the commissioners' concerns be conveyed to the BOS during their review of the ordinance. Mr. Thompson noted the proposed ordinance was modeled after the state ordinance. Mr. McNeil expressed concern regarding the amount of responsibility the developers have for the ponds. Mr, Thompson stated the ordinance will be developed in phases. The commissioners stated they would like a memo sent to the attention of the BOS conveying their concerns. Mr. Thomason stated he feels more information is needed. Mr. McNeil made a motion to forward a memo conveying the commissions' concerns to the BOS. The motion passed 4-0. Mr. Azar stated funds should be received upfront from the developers for the ponds, Mr. Thompson discussed the difficulty in determining the amount of funding required for future maintenance and repairs. 2 Comments of PlanninQ Commissioners and PlanninQ Staff Mr. Mahoney stated a joint worksession will be scheduled for the BaS and PC May 8th to discuss the new Transportation Bill which has been adopted by the General Assembly. Mr. Thompson announced planning staff member, Mr, Josh Gibson, has accepted a position with VA Outdoor Foundation. The commissioners complimented Mr. Gibson on his work performance. Ms. Hooker noted she will be unable to attend the May 1st PCPH, Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: Susan Carter Recording Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission Philip Thompson Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission Approved: Gary Jarrell Chairman, Roanoke County Planning Commission 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. '=P-L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on County Capital Improvements Plan Projects SUBMITTED BY: Elmer Hodge County Administrator SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several of the large County capital projects are beginning to come together at once, I would like to take this time for an informal discussion of these projects. Together, we will set priorities and plan for the development of these projects. Today will be a general discussion. I will also plan for a 15 - 20 minute work session at the first meeting of each month. The attached five year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) was officially adopted by the Board on May 8,2007. This is a planning document only, and each project will continue to be brought to the Board for updates and approval as the project amounts are refined, financing is identified, and appropriations are required. Today's work session will be a general update for the Board on several of the CIP projects, including the following: County Garage in partnership with the Western VA Water Authority Update on the radio system and status of partnership with Roanoke City Library system improvements, including Purchase of land in Mount Pleasant for future site Planning for renovations/replacement of the Glenvar library North County Fire Station Multi-generation Center E n:l ..... OJ o ..... a. VI (/J+-' +-' (.) C Q) Cl) Q) '0' ~ E ..... 0Q)a. c>"O n:l 0 Q) 0....."0 0:: a. c: ..... E ;:j O=LL ~~O Co.>. ;:j n:l L' 00 n:l ONE ..- E o ;:j ~Cf) 00 o o N >- LL 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 g 0 0 '" "" 0 ~ tJ '" 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 .... ~ 0 0> 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 ~ 0 to .2!. 01 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,...: ",' 0 0 .0 N M- 0 ..: o l: .... 0 '" 0 0 0 0 '" w 0 0 l"- e 0 Ll> Q::O "l '" M '" 0 0 '" N 0 0> ;;; <0 O. 0> .. l: N N N 0 '" .0 .0 co? .... 0 co? .... .0 0; 'Eat .. .... .... ... lfi .. .... N II> II> .... "'- .... .... ... .... ... 0 I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on on 0 '" 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... .... 0 ~ 0 co 0 co co 0 .... co co 0 0 ~ - 0 N Q Q Q Q r:i r:i r:i ,.: Q r:i r:i 06 - ..; o' ..: ..J 0 8 co 0 0 0 ... <II .., 0 0 ~ N 0 0 "'- <l:~ 0 II!. ... .... 0 N '" N co ... CD q ... ~ I-ll:l .. N ;. ai N .,; .. .. ... 0' ... ... ... - N N 00 ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... N .... ... to I-t .... ... N 0 0 '" '" 0 ~ .... 0 0 .... N 0 0 0 .... M <0 0 N g ,...: ~ .0 ci t..:- I 0 W M 0 .... .... ~ N .,. ... .... .. ",' .... .... II> ~ 0 "I ... .... 0 0 0 0 on '" 8 <:> .... 0 0 0 0 .... '" <:> 0 0 0 0 0 M ~ 0 <:> ~ ci ci ci ci .,; 10 ci <:) 0 0 0 0 0 eo M 0 <:> 10 10 10 eo - N ~ .... .... ... .... '" '" ... '" 0 <-I' N ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 ~ ij 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" co 0 ci ci ci ci ci .0 .,; ci ci ~ en 0 0 0 0 0 '" w 0 0 10 10 10 '" ;;; ... .. N 10 0 ... '" .... .... .... ... .... 0 N N "- OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0 <:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I"- '" 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 '" co 0 Q N ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 ci ci i ",' ci g , 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" .... <C It) ll:l 10 10 on "1 ~ .... o. .... ;;; ,... '" "'- 0 0 .... .... .... .... ;;; '" 0 ... ... ... cO N .... '" '" .... ... c:Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on 10 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. 0 "'. ~ 0. ~ ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 ci .... 10 0 Q "" 0 0 0 e 0 <0 '" Ii) .... eo <0 It) to 0 10 It) 0 N 0 N '" - .... ;;; ;;;. 10 <-I 0 ... .... .0 .... .0 M .... ... ... 14 N .... '" ;;; ~ 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 <:> iii 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 01 0> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" GI l: .,; ci ci ci 0 c:5 .0 ci c:5 ~ >- .- .... 0 10 0 0 '" '" 0 0 till It) o. 0. 10 '" .... Ii) "l "l' ai '" ~ ~ .... ;;; li ~ ..: ._ ::l ... '" .... .... ;r.u.. ... OJ "t:l l!! C> c. ]i i:i; ::) N 0 lI.I ~ .9 d; (5 "t:l " J:J GI l::: e .. 13 " ~ fi .>< DI c: b (J) E Co Q. c ~ " >> u. .::> III t! Cl. ::) 0 ~ 0 ~ .. 8' :J '0; " z .;J .. E -<ij OJ c >. 0 " l!! co ..., l::: 06 I1l ":' GI C '" OJ Dl 0 Cll :E (5 Q> CJ II> ~ Cll ] Iii c OJ ~ <II 0 U 0 ~ en C c '",., .~ E c 0 c. a Cl. u e ~ C> ~ Jj ;,; '0 ~ ~ lI.I 'iij .., ~ .E ii :r: l1. E! Q. 1tI ::> jg .0 .2 c c ~ ~ E ~ 0 lI.I en ltI ::i '0 ~ a. cD .9 0 (/) ~ ~ ,Q "I; B j Sl :;; b Cll (!) b ~ iii i! u 5l OJ c - ct b t/) <II Cll ... ~ C\l .. Z C\l 0 1:: II> C l::: ~ 0:: " c .~ b c .0 Cl. <II I- Z is.. "" 'b C .2 " 0 " l::: a :::; lil E Cll li> OJ 1tI g U C c E Q) u 0 - ~ ~ 8 OJ 5 u ~ Q) :8 8 .. 0:: E L U 1tI '" (J) ~ 0:: '1 'e. 8. ~ 'E '" u a; .2 't: ~ E ~ (J) ::iE a:: .s::; e ~ ..c "" ~ .. C\l 0 ~ iE .!O! 0 "t: ~ :; c "" E c. OJ E ~ E 2- c all 0 Q) Q) E 0 OJ ... C\l :; Ql C 0 - :c 0 5 ~ 0 u Z Ql a:: <0 l!! z c Z (/) C) ~ .2 0:: w U (J) .3 Q) u "I; " Cll .a .. f!- a w (J) a.. ~ CI ::i ~ .E '" .... '" '" ~ '" '" c 0 ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" 0 0 10 0 .... Q ... r;; r;; ,,; ,.; t: I:: '" .. 0 0 10 :2 ... ... ~ 10 ...., en .., ~ ,,; .. N .. .,; N .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. g g 15 0 .... .... g ~ .... ... 0 ~. ... N ~ ::i .... 0 0 g is 0 '" 0 0 '" g '" ~ '" N .... .. .... .. '" '" o o 8 N .... o '" g g o '" '" '" ~ II) .. '" ~ '" '" 0 8 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" 0 0 :il. 0 0 "'. <Xl '" N ~ N N .... l!l .. .... .. .. 0 .... 0 M '" C 0 '" :5 ~ '" 8 0 '" '" 0 .: 0 aj 0 c '" ~ 0 '" <Xl '" M ., q ....- '" '" N aj .. ;;; ,.; '" .. .. .... ~ iIi ~ ~ ~ '" ~ t> t> @ bl M <: S ~ .!; i: ~ ~ <: ~ :&: Ll. ~ " 01 'iii .. ~ <:> '" ~ cO> !. -1i ~ " ~ !!: ,- <: a ~ .. ~ " "ge '" ~ .!!l ~ IJ ~8. c c .. g ... .co 5 ~ e ,s. 'l;J ... fl.O <'5 ~ "" <Xl ~ .; O"@ ~ b " ~ N.. a .\1 .. <: {I: Il. '" {? ":"~ ~ co S ~ Ji ~~ ~ .. ~ .... e. 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E:: E ~11 0)0 o.~ 0: e r/)Cl. -- C"U CD (1) ~Et: o CD> ~ c: 0 CD rn...o o 0.. '-"" e:E-g O-"U >-1:9 c: C '0...2 ::l rn c: OO:J ON4- ..- 0 Oe:- N rn cD E o E o ::l ~Cf) u.. o-g~ <:> Cl <:> <:> lO '" <:> <:> <:> Q <:> C> Q Cl <:> <:> <:> co c co <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> ,..., C') 0 <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> on on "" on .~ 0 U <:> <:>. (:> ~ 10, "l. c 0 <:> 0 0 (:> <:> ~ 0 <:> 0 N ., ~ "l. ~ on 06 lO ~ ;:: 06 0 or; 0 0 <:> 0' ;;; .; 0 >b .; ..; <.l> CO o >ON CO ~ CO ,... N !;::: 0> CO <:> ,..., M 0;. C') 0> ({) <:> to M tt&j,,;, N <:> N lO N CO ,... ll> 0") N "'. 0> "- on ~ "'!. "" .,. .... N N' ... ..; ... .... ... ,..: cO lC) ~ cO ~ ... CO' ~ ;;; ffl M S~1l) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... .... ... ",0 o 0 >- I-UIL. '" Q => e " '" C U) 0 E jij (.) C "0 .s B c g <> II> .0 '" 0 Ql 0 ~ :> 'u; E :0 U t u:: IV (/) ,2 c III ~ E c '" .. :::. ~ '0 'E iU III 111 jij '0 !; Ol "' " Z .2 E .0 >- Ql 0 c: x E ;;; c j;j 2 ~ Q.. :2: C " III >- III E a; ,Q w oW 0 >- ~ .... IV Q) ~ "' ~ iU " Vl .2 Cii .0 Cl. c :;; Iii (/) .... C- o:: e III .. (.) ~ 0 > CI> '" ..., :> <LI ~ U) ..., C <LI ~ '0 x ~ x C U) ,~ '10 ,. E <ll <ll & c: III a; ~ 0 c: Cii u Q 1ii .. C- u .5 u E II) !'! > ~ '" .0 1ii .. :> C 0 II> "0 :J 0 0. .~ '~ Cl "' (!> '" <LI :.J B ll. CD 0 Q) 0:: ;;; :> Cl. 0 E III D. " 0 .0 0:: (.) ~ :> " Iii :Q ~ Q; .. IV <LI 0 :;; x :::; c: .0 -. III 0. 0 CQ ,.. II) In r: U) Q; ell >- ~ 'is :> .... :> c: Q) C 0 ::l .. :> 0 .. :> "'" III C a; c: 111 Uj U OC E ~ In c:; '" 0 Cl '5 a:: ::l U) OJ .\,1 111 ~ :> ~ J: c: ll> :> (.) :> <ll '" U 0 'E (!> '" (.) "' LJ ~ w.. "'" c CI:: ~ 0 '" 't :0 111 U c: II> :> E u '" <tl III U 5 .!2 >- n; OJ " III .. Q "'" '" III ::; ~ ~ In '" c: 0 c: & ~ c: c: .. ~ .. Q) I 15 II> In 0- (II ,.. 0 E c t .. 0 .Q ,2 .c .0 c: 0 " .. c: (5 1i: .0 III b a::: '" N ~ ~ N i:i: :; E Cl. II) " '0, ~ ~ ~ Cl .~ ;J: "' ;:; <> C ::J C. .:!! 05 III Q) 111 0 0 .0 E Q) III .. <: 0 c: ::l C:> -' 'E 111 III ~ en Z Z en g U) ro -1: E a:: III Z Q. <II 111 a:: i= :2: .. ~ :> III 0 .. '" c: II) l!! .c '" ... 0 :> 0 III u u:: CL !; U Cl l:: ~ :J '" -. e: E: "'" '" 0 '" Q.. U :t: E co en 1-...... O)r..> o .!!?. I- 0 0-1- ClJCL ..... ........ C-o (!) CD CD ..:.:::E!:: OCD,E c: > CD coea o a.--- Cl:::E-o --CD 0_-0 Z'~s c: 0._ ::l CO C OO::J ON.... ..... 0 0>- NI- I CO roE 8E N::l >-(f) lL. <:> <:> g <:> <:> <:> 1.0 <:> 0 0 <:> I"- 0 N 0 0 0 0 C> 0 ~ <:> <:> 0 0 "" N <:> 0 0 <:> I"- 0 0 0 co 0 0 <:> co <:> 0 <:> 1.0 .., <:> to <:> <:> d. 1.0 to 0 <0 0 ..,. <:> <:> <:;> ..,. g; <? 0 ,z; ~ N' a:i 0 <:5 - ,.: <:5 0 ,..; 0 ,..; <:5 ..; 0' ,.: ..,. ... 0 <0 "" <:> 0 ::; to to '" ..,. ..,. 1.0 CO CO '" <:;> CO ... ,., 0 0> CO <0 N '" ..,. '" ;;; 0> N '" 0> ;;; CO on CO 16 fft N ... N ... ... ... ... ... ... N t.: ... ... ... ~ N ... ... ... ... ;; ... "'(J ",. w .... 'e- . 00 n. ~ '" CI l.L. '01 :l '" CI> ]i "'" "0 U I;; III 0 Ql ~ iO 0:: :l5 'e- o. '0 00 :> III Q. Q '" en c.. > E :0 ::> Q) 0 u "" >- .;;; 0 "" :> <.J "0 '(;; Q) t:n c.. '" - () '0 (F) ~ ~ '" e 0 13 ~ =: CO 0. '" "0 0. w c: '" >- Co Co n. ~ '" Ol '" '" .Q cd c: '0' ~ ~ ctI '" .Cl '" Ol iii '" ::J J) Ol .c .. .E J::: <:: Q; '" 'm '" 0 '" (.l ~ 0; .. CI> Gl " c: '" 0. J: 0 <: J::: ;: 0:: CI> "5 Ol "", c: t! t: ~ Ol ~ 0. C/") 0. Ol t; c: ctI c: '0 to oS: ~ .2 c: ~ Ol "'" ~ ~ (; l! J: a: "'" c: () -1: ox< J: ~ 0. c:: r: "iO 00 :~ '" 0 " <.> Ui E " ,9 CI> <> "'(J Cl.. <a 0 -t '" c: 0 rJ) >< e. C> '" <:D C c: Cl.. "0 06 C> ~ w Ii> ~ t; ~ c: ::> l! Cl.. ::> 0 co '" 0:: I- CI> '0 .~ r;r :c al Gi n. "0 0 J: '" ." 00 '"" E '0 <I) CI> ~ to I- "0 a 0:: 0> -t co c .~ 0 Gi ~ <> .. 0:: co a. <( (; c: c: "0 E II> c: .. 0 '" .E IV '" e E ~ >. 0. 'a. co '" ... '.;:i is ~ '" '0 '" II> 't1 '" '0 w E D.. '~ ! rr E E 't cd .. ~ c: >. E ~ '" f 15 c: c: 'C: .. c:: '0 ~ '" t: c'5 to '" '" '" E oi:! III '" ...J f- l') .0:- eD r 5" u :I: rJ) .. W > ~ Go) ~ "l 0 :5 t: '" 'ii :g .. a. E E ~ .'9 :) r=. ::c: .s q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2,2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2, Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. . I ACTION NO, ITEM NUMBER R-l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 Certificate of recognition to Roanoke County Schools for being selected one of the Best 100 Communities for Music Education in America in 2007 ElmerC. Hodge ~ f"\ij- County Administrator AGENDA ITEM: APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: For the 5th time in 6 years, the Roanoke County Schools have been named one of the Best 1 00 Communities for Music Education in America. The award is based on nationwide survey responses concerning the school system and the types of music programs offered at the elementary and secondary levels. Roanoke County is one of two Virginia communities honored this year. The survey was conducted jointly by the country's top organizations devoted to music and learning which included: ~ American Music Conference ~ National Association for Music Education ~ Music Teachers National Association ~ Mr. Holland's Opus Foundation ~ Music for All Foundation ~ National School Boards Association ~ Yamaha Corporation of America ~ VH1 Save the Music Jim Bradshaw, Music Coordinator, will be present to accept the certificate of recognition. . ~_ of l\oano-. 'II . . . "~r. . ;":iin.r-'~ . .....~~.... 'I /a~,; ..'~I ~ , . . - " ;~;- CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Roanoke County Schools For being named one of the 2007 Best 100 Communities for Music Education in America ~ For the fifth time in six years, Roanoke County Schools have been named as one of the top 100 communities in Americalfor music education. Roanoke County is one of only two Virginia communities 10 receive the honor this year. )0> The award waS made by the following'associations: American Music Conference, National Association for Music Education, Music Teachers National Association, Mr. Holland's Opus Foundation, Mus!c for All Foundation, National SChool Boards Association, Yamaha Corporation of America, and VH1 'Save Ihe Music, )0> Recipients of the award were determined based upon responses to a wide array of questions regarding. the school system and the music programs offered at the elementary and secondary levels. ~ The Board wishes to recognize and congratulate Roanoke County Schools for being selected as one of the Best 100 Communities for Music Education in America in 2007. Presented this 22nd day of May 2007. ~,,~-D c. ~o.r_ Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chair Inuki 7{.~ Michael W. Altizer 8. "6t1d. t ~ ~ \Y'l'~ Q. W Michael A. Wr~'I ~ I j ACTION NO. cK-~ ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 Certificates of recognition to the All-State Band and Choir winners. AGENDA ITEM: APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Certificates of recognition will be presented to the following students who were selected for the Virginia All-State Band and Choir. All-State Band winners: }o> Robert Evans, Senior at Hidden Valley High School, Bassoon }o> Kenny Lambert, Senior at Glenvar High School, Trombone }o> Nathan Rodgers, Senior at Hidden Valley High School, Bass Clarinet }o> Sam Seedily, Junior at Northside High School, Contra Alto Clarinet All-State Choir winners: }o> Sarah Bowyer, Senior at Cave Spring High School, Alto I }o> Matt McCubbin, Senior at Hidden Valley High School, Tenor II ~ Sarah Short, Senior at Hidden Valley High School, Soprano II The All-State Band was held at Christopher Newport University on April 14, 2007, and the All-State Choir was held at Christiansburg High School on April 28, 2007. Students are selected through school, district, and state auditions and are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the State. Jim Bradshaw, Music Coordinator, will be present for the recognition, Dr, Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent, is also expected to attend. I (,aunt!' of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Robert Evans Hidden Valley High School For being selected for the All-State Band ).> Robert Evans, a senior at Hidden VaHey High School, plays th~ bassoon and was selected to play in the ?007 Virginia All-Stale Band held on April 14, 2Q07. al Christopher Newport University. . ).> Students for the Virginia All-State Band are selected through school. district, and stale auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state~ ).> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Robert Evans for being selected for the Virginia All- State Band and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. j,' III.i Presented this 22nd day of May, 2007 ~ ~ o...y (.. ~ c:w &... h;C:; F;~~, '!t:;' Michael W. Altizer \Y\'~ a.. W~ Michael A. Wray (to- of 3aomto~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION ,i Awarded to Kenny Lambert Glenvar High School For being selected for the All-State Band )> Kenny Lambert, a senior at Glenvar High School, plays the trombone and was selected to play in the 2007 Virginia All-State Band held on April 14, 2007, at Christopher Newport University. )> Students for the Vfrginia All-State Band are selected through school, district. and state auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materi~ls in front of selected music educators from the "entire state. )> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Kenny Lambert for being selected for the Virginia All-State Band and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. " PresentEtd this 22nd day of May, 2007 ~\~~ Go ~cw... /he:;; F;;~, V Michael W. Altizer 1 \""'l'~ Q. W~ Michael A. Wray .. ~untP of ]&olltrO~ , . .. , \"-11, '1" r~, . ~~i\;~. . -..1 .. ~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Nathan Rodgers Hidden Valley High School For being selected for the All-State Band )0. Nathan Rodgers, a senior at Hidden Valley High School, plays the bass clarinet and was selected to play in the 2007 Virginia All-State Band held on April 14. 2007, at Chrif?topher Newport University. r:o ,)0. Students for the Virginia All-State Band areseJecled through school. district, and state auditions. They €ire required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. }. The Boar.d of Supervisors congratulates Nathan Rodgers for being selected for the Virginia All-State Band and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. Presented this 22nd day of May, 2007 ~ ,~~ Go ~ Qo.t .... ~iChard C. Flora. '!J::;:-ir l' n uJ..ut ,,(. . Michael W. Altizer \"Y(~Q. W~ Michael A. Wray " . = . = . ~ of 3aoanoke CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to Sam Seedily " Northside High School I I I I I I 1 For being selected for the All-State Band :) Sam Seedily, a junior at Northside High School, plays the contra alto clarinet and was selected to play in the 2007 Virginia All-State Band held on: April 14. 2007, at Ch~istopher Newporl University. . . >>- Students for the Virginia All-State Band are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. ~ The. Board of Supervisors congratulates Sam Seedily for being selected for th'e Virginia AII- Stare Band and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. Presented this 22nd day of May, 2007 I I I j J ~ ,c.)..J> c. ~ c:w _ 1;::; F;!~. ~ir Michael W. Altizer "'\l\'~ Q. W~ Michael A. Wray = = = €,aunt!' of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF REpOGNITION Awarded to SARAH BOWYE"R CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL For being selected for the All-State Choir )0 Sarah Bowyer, a &enior at Cave Spring High School, and an Alto I, was selected to participate in the 2007 Virginia All-State Choir held on April 28, 2007, at Christiansburg High School. .. ) Students for the Virginia All-State Choir are selected tJ1rough school, district, ,and state auditionS.1:! They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire stale. )> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Sarah Bowyer for being selected for the Virginia All-State Choir and extends its best wishes to her in all of her future endeavors. Presented this 22nd day of May. 2001 ~\~-P (. ~QH"" ~::C~t~ir Michael W. Altizer l'\~ a.. W~ Michael A. Wray = II II; ~untP of l\oano~ .. . . \'" ~~ "'" -, I "',' '~" ,,~\~;. , . ,"I,.. :v.~ -r I~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to " MATT MCCUBBIN ~ M HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL For being selected for the All-State Choir )- Matt McCubbin, a senior at Hidden Valley High School, and a Tenor II, was selected" to participate in the 2007 Virginfa All-State Choir held on April 28, 2007, at Chri~tiansburg High Schoo'. )> Students for the Virginia All-State Choir are selected through school, district, and stale auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials in front of selected music educators from the entire state. )> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Matt McCubbin for being selected for the Virginia All-State Choir and extends its best wishes to him in all of his future endeavors. p'resented this 22nd day of May, 2007 " oseph P. McNamara, Chairman II ~ \ o.-.-S> l. ~ ~ .... fic"'~d C. Flora, '!J::;:.' f7huJ.ut 7J. . Michael W. Altizer ",'~ a.. W~ Michael A. Wray " = =" .... -I I I ~_ of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Awarded to SARAH SHORT HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL For being selected for the All-State Choir )- Sarah Short, a senior at Hidden Valley High School, and a Soprano II, was selected to participate in the 2001 Virginia All-State Choir held on April 28, 2007, at Ctllistiansbur9 High Scllool. )- Students for the Virginicl All-Slate Cl10ir are selected through school, district, and state auditions. They are required to perform prepared and sight reading materials dn front of selected music ~ucators from :the entire state, )- The Board of Supervisors congratulates Sarah Short for being selected for the Virginia AlI.State Choir and extends its best wishes lo her in all of her future endeavors. Presented this 22nd day of May, 2007 ~ ,e,)..."S> l. ~ c:w ..... J;:; F;;~, 71:;1' Michael W. Altizer \'1l~ 0.. W~ Michael A. Wray ACTION NO. ITEM NO. R-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to students at A. R. Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkillsUSA and Future Business Leaders of America, Inc. (FBLA) awards. Elmer C. Hodge d~ (1~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: SkillsUSA is a national organization serving more than 264,500 high school and college students and professional members who are enrolled in training programs in technical, skilled, and service occupations, including health occupations. At the Virginia SkillsUSA Leadership Conference in April 2007, there were 22 gold medal recipients from the A. R. Burton Technology Center in the following categories: American Spirit, Criminal Justice Technical Exam, Job Interview, Motorsports, Occupational Display, Opening and Closing Ceremonies, Promotional Bulletin Board, Television News Anchor/Reporter, and Welding. The Future Business Leaders of American, Inc. (FBLA) is a nonprofit educational association of students preparing for careers in business and business-related fields. More than 240,000 active members participate in more than 13,000 chartered chapters in 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, U.S. Territories, Canada, and Department of Defense Dependent Schools worldwide. At the state conference in April 2007, there was one gold medal recipient from the A. R. Burton Technology Center for Business Math. Andy McClung, Principal, A. R. Burton Technology Center; Joan Farley and Tim Miles, SkillsUSA Sponsors; and Ginger Cromer, FBLA Sponsor, have been invited to attend and accept the resolution, and the students will be given individual certificates of recognition. Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent, will also attend. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO STUDENTS AT A. R. BURTON TECHNOLOGY CENTER FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA SKILLSUSA AND FUTURE BUSINESS LEADERS OF AMERICA (FBLA) AWARDS WHEREAS, SkillsUSA is the second largest student organization in the nation, serving more than 264,500 high school and college students and professional members who are enrolled in training programs in technical, skilled, and service occupations, including health occupations; and WHEREAS, the Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) is a nonprofit educational association of students preparing for careers in business and business- related fields with more than 240,000 active members; and WHEREAS, several students from A. R. Burton Technology Center, having achieved first place in local and district level competitions, won gold medals at the Virginia SkillsUSA and FBLA competitions held in April 2007; and WHEREAS, the following awards were received: ? American Spirit: Billie Stultz, Glenvar High School; Cynthia Bousman, William Byrd High School ? Business Math: John Cook, Hidden Valley High School ? Criminal Justice Technical Exam: John Ashe, Northside High School ? Job Interview: Jessica Strokus, Hidden Valley High School ? Motorsports: Grey Patterson, Cave Spring High School; Kinnie Austin, post secondary student; Jacob Dodson, Cave Spring High School; Matt Wright, post secondary student ? Occupational Display: Matt Wright, post secondary student; Kinnie Austin, post secondary student ? Opening & Closing Ceremonies: Ashley Crouch, Cave Spring High School; John Ashe, Northside High School; Erica Lloyd, Hidden Valley High School; Tyler Perdue, Hidden Valley High School; Kristen Wade, Cave Spring High School; Christopher Dooley, William Byrd High School; Sean Guzman, Northside High School ? Promotional Bulletin Board: Danielle Chambers, Northside High School; Stephanie Digirolamo, William Byrd High School; Kristina Duncan, Cave Spring High School; Krystal Lehrer, Cave Spring High School; Eyshia StClair, Hidden Valley High School ? Television News Anchor/Reporter: Jacob Elias, Hidden Valley High School; Amanda Hamilton, Hidden Valley High School; Amy Woodson, Hidden Valley High School ? Welding: Kinnie Austin, post secondary student NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the students at A. R. Burton Technology Center for winning the Virginia SkillsUSA and FBLA awards; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to each of the students in all of their future endeavors. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. _~ -<1 (a.-c) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to the Glenvar High School wrestling team for winning the State Group A Championship (a) Certificate of recognition to Jeremy Mowles, for winning the State Championship at 135-Pounds (b) Certificate of recognition to Aaron Blomberg, for winning the State Championship at 145-Pounds (c) Certificate of recognition to Ben Jamison, for winning the State Championship at 189-Pounds Elmer C. Hodge ~ f{~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Glenvar High School wrestling team won the State Group A Championship on March 3, 2007, by a commanding margin over three-time defending champion Manassas Park. The Highlanders won their first state crown since Group AA championships in 1971 and 1972; and became the first Roanoke Valley school to capture a Virginia High School League (VHSL) wrestling title since William Byrd won in Group AA in 1982. In addition to winning the team championship, Jeremy Mowles, Aaron Blomberg and Ben Jamison won individual state championships and ten Highlanders placed in the top six at the state tournament. Coach Jamie Soltis was named Coach of the Year. In addition to the team members and coaches, the following individuals are expected to attend the meeting: Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; Curtis Hicks, Principal; and Art Lawrence, Athletic Director. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING TEAM FOR WINNING THE STATE GROUP A CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Wrestling Team won the State Group A championship at the Salem Civic Center on March 3, 2007, by a commanding margin over three-time defending champion Manassas Park; and WHEREAS, the Highlanders won their first state crown since Group AA championships in 1971 and 1972; and became the first Roanoke Valley school to capture a Virginia High School League wrestling title since William Byrd won in Group AA in 1982; and WHEREAS, Jeremy Mowles, Aaron Blomberg and Ben Jamison won individual state championships and ten Highlanders placed in the top six at the state tournament; and WHEREAS, the Highlanders were also Region C and Three Rivers District Champions, took first place in the Highlanders Invitational (Glenvar) and second in the War of the Wrestlers (Covington); and had a dual match record of 15 and 1; and WHEREAS, the Highlanders are coached by Jamie Soltis, who was named Coach of the Year by the State, AII-Timesland, and Roanoke Valley Wrestling Association, and assistant coaches Malachi Underwood and Chris Blomberg. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thatthe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING TEAM: Alex Asimakopoulos, John Ayers, Aaron Blomberg, Adam Blomberg, Andrew Cundiff, Ben Cundiff, Warren Fulcher, Jake Hooker, Sam Huffman, Ben Jamison, Jeremy Mowles, Michael Whitaker, John Wiley, and Kevin Woods for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. 2 ~untP of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Jeremy Mowles for winning the 13S-Pound State Group A Wrestling Championship ~ Jeremy Mowles. a junior at Glenvar High School, won the 135-Poul"jd State Group A Wrestling Championship on March 3, 2007. >- Mr. Mowles also won the Three Rivers District fina., Region C final, took first at the Highlander Invitational, and second at lhe Battle of the Beach (Delaware) and Big Blue (Christiansburg). >- Mr. Mowles completed the season with 31 wins and 3 losses. >- The Board of Supervisors congratlllates Mr. Mowles upon winning this championship and expresses its best wishes for success in his future endeavors. Presented this 22nd day of May, 2007 ihukt It. ~ Michael W. Altizer 8. "/Juld.. .(!b.~ oseph B. "Butch" Church ",,'~ C\. W~ Michael A. Wray .. · '" ~untP of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Aaron BloInberg for winning the 145-Pound State Group A Wreslling Championship );> Aaron Blomberg, a senior at Glenvar High School. won the 145-Pound Slate Group A Wrestling Championship on March 3,2007, and also won the 140-Pound State Championship h2006. ~ 'Mr. Blomberg also WOI1 the Three Rivers District final, Region Cfinal, ~too1< first at the Highlander Invitational, first at the War of the Wrestlers (Covington). and second at the Battle of the Beach (Delawa~) and Big Blue (Chrlstianburg). ~ Mr. Blomberg completed the searon with 39 wins .and 2105se5. };> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Mr. Blomberg upon winning this championship and expresses its best wishes for success in hIs future endeavors. '" Presented.'this 22nd day of May, 2007 Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chairman Ih~?i.~ Michael W. Altizer I. "~:f.d. t {}1w.~ os~ph B. "Butch" Church \l\'~ Q. W Michael A. Wray ~ " ,,;ill ~untP of l\oano~ CERTIFICA'PE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO = .. III Ben Jam.ison for winning the 189-Pound State Group A Wrestling Championship ~ Ben Jl;lmison, a senior at Gr~nvar High: School, won the 189-Pound Sta~e Group A Wrestling ChampionshipDn March 3.2007. ;;. Mr. Jamison also won the Three Rivers District final, Region C final. 'took first at the War of the Wresllers~(Covington), and second at the Highlanders Invitational and Battle of the Beach (Delaware). >- Mr. Jamison completed the sea~~:m with 36 wins and 4 losses. ~ The Board of Supervisors congratuJates~ Mr. Jamison upon winning this championship and ~xpr~sses Its best wishes for success in his future endeavors. Rresented this 22nd day of May, 2007 ~ oseph P. McNamara, Chairman ~ \c.)n.S> c.. ~ ~ .... Richard C. Flora. Vice-Chairman I'nuk/ 71. ~ Michae1 W. Altizer ~B. "~*,-.(!b.~ ~oseph B. "Butch" Church \'l~ Q. W Michael A. Wray ~ II ACTION NO. ITEM NO. i, /--- t..; ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Certificate of recognition to Julia Koff, Hidden Valley High School, for winning the State Group AA Diving Championship APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Julia Koff, a senior at Hidden Valley High School (HVHS), won the individual state championship for the one-meter diving event at the State Swimming and Diving Championships on February 16, 2007, with a score of 317.30. Ms. Koff holds the school record for this event with a score of 411 ,25 and is also a three-time district champion and two-time regional champion. Ms. Koff is described by her coach as a true leader amongst her teammates with grace, poise, and athletic prowess. Ms. Koff will be attending George Mason University in the fall where she will represent the school as a member of the co-ed competitive cheerleading squad. Ms. Koff and her parents are expected to attend the meeting. Also expected to attend are Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; Rhonda Stegall, HVHS Principal; and Sheri Vaughn, Diving Coach, Drew Barrineau, Windsor Hills School Board member, is unable to attend due to a conflict. ~untP of l\oano~ jl CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Julia Kaff' for winning the State Group AA Diving Championship };> Julia Kaff, a"senk>rat Hidden Valley High School (HVHS), won the indivldual ~tate championship for the one-meter diving event at the State Swimming and OJying ChampIonships on Feb.ruary 16. 2007, with a score of 317.30. };> In addition to winning tihestate championship, Ms. Koff hold the HVHS record for thIs event witt1a score of 411.25 and is a three-time dlstrictchampion and a two-time regional champion. )> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Ms. Koff upon her achievements and expresses Hs best wishes for success in her future endeavors. Presented this 2200 day of May, 2007 ~.. c)...-D c. ~ Got .... Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chairman !h.vk/ It. ~ Michael W. Alti~er 8. "~ .(JJw.~ oseph B. "Butch" Church ~'~Q.W Michael A. Wray ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to the Hidden Valley Girls Basketball Team for winning the State Group AA Championship. (a) Certificate of recognition to Abby Oliver for being named First Team All-State, Associated Press First Team All- State, and All-Times land First Team. (b) Certificate of recognition to Abby Redick for being named Associated Press First Team All-State and AII-Timesland First Team. APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Hidden Valley High School Titans girls basketball team won their first State Group AA basketball championship defeating the Charlottesville Black Knights, a team that has participated in the state tournament for the last four years by a score of 63 to 53. During the championship game, the Titans completed 53.7 percent of their shots and allowed only six turnovers. During the season, the Tjtans amassed a record of 29 wins and 1 loss. Team members Abby Oliver and Abby Redick will also receive certificates of recognition for their individual achievements. Coach Mike McGuire, in his first year with the program, was named Group AA Girls Coach of the Year by The Associated Press Group. In addition to the team members and coaches, the following individuals are expected to attend the meeting: Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent; Rhonda Stegall, Principal; and Dennis Layman. Athletic Director. Drew Barrineau, Windsor Hills School Board member, is unable to attend due to a conflict. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO HIDDEN VALLEY TITANS GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING THE STATE GROUP AA BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County teaching cooperation, sportsmanship, and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Hidden Valley High School Titans girls basketball team won their first State Group AA basketball championship defeating the Charlottesville Black Knights, a team that has participated in the state tournament for the last four years, by a score of 63 to 53; and WHEREAS, during the championship game, the Titans completed 53.7 percent of their shots and allowed only six turnovers; and WHEREAS, the Titans received a sportsmanship award for their behavior on and off the courts during the state playoffs; and WHEREAS, the Titans were also River Ridge District Champions and Region III Champions; and WHEREAS, the Titans amassed a record of 29 wins and one loss for the season; and WHEREAS, the Titans are coached by Mike McGuire who was named Group AA Coach of the Year by the Virginia High School Coaches Association and the Associated Press, and Assistant Coaches Erika Hale, Shawn Patton, Buddy Ross, Leigh Ann Woodley, and Penny Hunt. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL TITANS GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM: Kylee Beecher, Abby Boggs, Amanda Crotty, Katie Degen, Lindsay Divers, Amanda Hamilton, Haley Kendrick, Kari Myers, Abby Oliver, Kayla Osborne, Abby Redick, Morgan Williams, Mariel Wilson, and Brittany Wood for their athletic ability, their team spirit and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches and the school in their future endeavors. 2 = = ~untP of l\oano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Abby Oliver for being named First Team All-State, Associated Press First Team All-State, ane{ AII-TimEtslalld First Team )0> Abby Oliver, a junior at Hidden Valley High School, assisted her team to tl1eir first State Group M Champion.~hip by scoring 32 JX)ints during the championship game and completing 10 of 10 foul shots. )0> During the season, Ms. Oliver averaged 16 points, 3.2 assists, 2.8 rebounds, and 3 steals per game and shot 43.2 percent from the 3-point range and 46.7 percent overall. )0> Ms. Oliver was named Region III and AII- Timesland Player of the Year in recognition of her athletic ability and efforts on the court. )0> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Ms. Oliver upon her achievements and expresses its best wishes for success in her future endeavors. Presented this 22m day of May, 2001 II II II II 1nUd.ut ?( ~ Michael W. Altizer ~2. "4,1d. .~~ Joseph B. "Butch" Church \'\~Q.W Michael A. Wray ~ ~untP of 3aoano~ CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWARDED TO Abby Redick for being named Associated Press First Team All-State and AII-Timesland First Team );;> Abby Redick, a sophomore at Hidden Valley High School, assisted her team to their first State Group M Championship and a season record of 29 wins and 1 loss. );;> Ms. Redick shot 51.8 percent from the field, blocked 25 shots, and scored 19 points during the team's semifinal game. );;> During the season, Ms. Redick averaged 13.5 points, 3.1 assists, 7.3 rebounds, and 1.5 steals per game. );;> The Board of Supervisors congratulates Ms. Redick upon her achievements and expresses its best wishes for success in her future endeavors. Presented this 2200 day of May, 2007 ~ \ e.)....-.D (. ~ a..o .... Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chairman Ih~?f,.~ Michael W. Altizer ~E. "&.*'- ~(}kttb Joseph B. "Butch" Church \Y\~ A.. W Michael A. Wray ~ 0-1 PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Ted Alan Leneave 4-5/2007 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 1, 2007 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 22, 2007 BOS 1st Reading 4/24/07 A. REQUEST The petition of Ted Alan Leneave to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment on 0.89 acre, located at 2132 River Oaks Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Leneave spoke on his own behalf in granting a Special Use Permit on his property. He claims the accessory apartment will be occupied by his retired parents only and that he has no intention of renting out the apartment should his parents no longer occupy the apartment. The Russlen Farms Homeowners Association does not allow Accessory Apartments in the River Oaks Subdivision. A letter was sent to both Mr. Leneave and the Roanoke County Department of Community Development requesting conditions be put on the property. If these conditions were adopted by the Planning Commission, the Homeowners Association would not be opposed to the Accessory Apartment. The conditions were: 1) That the use ot-the premises as an accessory apartment is to be limited to the parents of Mr. Leneave; and 2) That the Special Use Permit terminate at such time that Mr. Leneave's parents no longer occupy the premises. Mr. Joe Obenchain commented that it would not be lawful for Roanoke County to enact the rules and policies of individual Homeowners Associations, and the proposed conditions were not adopted by the Planning Commission. There was no representative of the Russlen Farms Homeowners Association present at the hearing. Mr. Leneave again commented that only his parents would occupy the apartment and he would not rent it out to anyone. D. CONDITIONS None E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Azar made a motion to favorably recommend the SUP request to the Board of Supervisors. Motion passed 3-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Petitioner: Ted Alan leNeave Request: Obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment in a R.1 zoning district location: 2132 River Oaks Drive Catawba Magisterial District: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request by Mr, Ted LeNeave to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct an approximately 810 square foot accessory apartment within the basement of his principal residence. The property is 0.9 acre in size and is zoned R- 1 Low Density Residential district The proposed accessory apartment conforms to the R-1 district standards at a residential density of one to three units per acre. The proposed layout of the apartment would contain one bedroom, a walk-in closet, one bathroom, a living room, and a kitchen area. The site is designated Development in the 2005 Community Plan and the use is compatible with this designation. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30.29-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines an accessory apartment as a second dwelling unit within a detached single family dwelling which is clearly incidental and subordinate to the main dwelling. An accessory apartment requires the approval of a special use permit from Roanoke County if created in a R-1 zoning district. Use and Design Guidelines for an accessory apartment include the following: 1. An accessory apartment shall only be considered as an accessory use to a detached single family residence and no accessory apartment shall be located in any structure other than the principal structure on the lot except as otherwise permitted in subsection (C) below. 2. Maximum floor area: Upon completion of the construction, the accessory apartment shall not contain more than fifty (50) percent of the finished floor area of the principal dwelling unit located on the same lot, but in no case shall the accessory apartment exceed 1,000 square feet. 3. Only one accessory apartment shall be allowed on anyone lot or parcel, and the owner of the property shall reside on the premises. 4. Exterior entrances to the apartment shall be located so as to appear as a single family dwelling. 5. Minimum floor area of the apartment Three hundred (300) square feet. 6. One parking space shall be required in addition to required parking for the principal dwelling. 7. Health Department approval of sewage disposal shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for an accessory apartment The intent of accessory apc:rtments is to afford an opportunity for the development of small rental units designed to meet the special housing needs of single persons, persons with fixed or limited income, and relatives of families who live or desire to live in the County. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - Mr. LeNeave owns the property located at 2132 River Oaks Drive. The accessory apartment 1 will be constructed within the primary dwelling. In December 2006, the LeNeaves received a building permit to finish the construction of their basement. With the issuance of a special use permit, they propose to install a stove in the kitchen area, which will create an accessory apartment. Mr. LeNeave's parents already live in the primary dwelling, but the accessory apartment will be for their exclusive use. There will be access between the primary dwelling from the accessory apartment which will be used exclusively by the residents of 2132 River Oaks Drive. The dwelling was built in 2006 in the River Oaks at Russlen Farms subdivision. It has a stairway along the side of the garage leading from the driveway to the backyard, where there is a separate entrance into the basement If the special use permit is issued, the residents will use this entrance as their apartment access. The residents would park their vehicle in the main driveway, which is large enough to adequately park multiple vehicles. ToooaraohvNeaetation - The property is at a higher elevation than the rest of the subdivision and of the subdivision to the rear of the property that is currentiy being built. Vegetation includes mostly shrubs; due to the recent construction of the subdivision, there are no trees. Surrounding Neiahborhood - The River Oaks subdivision was constructed in 2006. The dwellings in the subdivision are all about the same size and have the same brick fa~ade. Adjoining properties are zoned R-t 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture - The proposed accessory apartment will be 810 square feet in size within the basement of the primary dwelling. Included in the layout will be a bedroom, a walk-in closet a bathroom, a living room, and a kitchen. AccessfTraffic Circulation - Access and traffic will not be negatively impacted with the addition of an accessory apartment Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Utilities and Fire & Rescue services will not be negatively impacted with the addition of an accessory apartment 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The property is designated as Development in the 2005 Community Plan. An accessory apartment is compatible with the existing neighborhood. This area is where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Conventional residential developments will be mostly single-family lots including attached, detached, and zercrlot line housing options. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petitioners' request for an accessory apartment complies with all use and design standards required by the zoning ordinance. The proposed use would not negatively impact the utilities, schools, parks, local traffic, or the site. It would be compatible with the existing and future uses of the Development designation of the River Oaks at Russlen Farms subdivision. 2 CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY; HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS 4-5/2007 Amanda Komar PC: 5/1/2007 Application Narrative~ustification Site Plan Floor Plan BOS: 5/22/2007 3 P?~()lLX)~ ~~ County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Only 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 240] 8-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 I Application fee: LO,OO Placards issued: Case Number ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) o Rezoning p(Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver DAdministrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address wlzip "'T'EP A LAtJ LZ Nc:...." 6" 2..\"&1.. ~\\tL~ oA~..:~ Vl'Z..\\1t. ~A.L'lM , V A. 1A-\ S'3. Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No.: 5&.\0 - S Z-\. - !i,S'S- 114- - ~ 1..~1 ~1..l - '!.15'5"'" 11~ - 01 '60 ( ::S"Ak.t h5 ASO\1!...) Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Owner's name/address wlzip Property Location l..\"l 1. ~\\1 ~K o.co.~':o O\Z.lV t. Magisterial District: c.1\ TA~~h Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: OS"(,.D~-04- ,-,. 00-0000 Existing Zoning: :L Size of parcel(s): Acres: Existing Land Use: S\N('U:; fAM..\L "LA~~\.~~ REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/SIW /CP) Proposed Zoning: R1.. I Sf"t.c...lIlo..L \js''t. rE.iZ.~\T Proposed Land Use: to.c..c..t.o:.-::.oll-'{ APA~""t........ ",r.), Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA T/VE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/WIAAJ. . Variance/Waiver of Section(s) Nil\- of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal oflnterpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zon ing Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R1S/W/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R1S/W/CP V/AA rn Consultation 81/2"x JI"conceptplan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description . Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent ofthe owner. OVvTler's Signature 2 JUSTIFICA nON FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS \Et> AL~~ LENEA.\fG"" Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (J 5.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. \'*\.':> ~~u~'t ~EE\:c:. ~ (WA,...:::o~"l CJ:Ju1d"'C'j c..vOL ~'Lc.. "30-~2..-l Jl...CLt..~s~'{ p..e>~(L"'t~-C!:.. 'S~c. "30-~l..-l(p.) A-r~Os. A.~ orPO~"(l:)t.H\:'{ '"'t"O i>E\lE1...c>P ~ ~S."""iLy A-,'-A~1:"M..e:~\ t=olL ...... f'f\z..So~S W\\:\.-\ F\,,~ <J\~ ul'-L\.,- t..O ll--lC.Of'-\..t.. I ~~\) 'I i<.~\:\\J~ 0(= ~Ja..",^-\L.lU v.:l\:\-o L\\Jf.. C;I"(a... OESUZt:"\o 1..\\Jt. \~ \:"~t.. c..c.>\J~-c.'{. ~ ""'-?A-lZ."\"-E"f..J,\ WH....L.. ~'i. Fc>r'l. ~ VSE' of ""-'{ 1 z. ~...>C Ie'\. '-l~ oLO \?~~~TS \~\ Ot> M..€'E\ \~€ \2.€6(V$t.i.M...'LIo.,:)-n o\=" F\.~c-c ~~O Lli'-^-\.'\.. "'-0 lo..) C_cn'''~_t... . Please explain how the project confom1s to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. ~ 4.~C.,,-^L c;.\:A-t-lOJltLOS 'S?Lc..\~\.t..D~ I~ St.c- '3b-$2.-\~) \-1 ~ ,....,t.~ A-s ~L..Ow'S', I) ~ A:f'A.I1.."t:~E~\ W\.LL \.':!.'t. LOC-A-c.~\.) V.)\ \:\,\-\10 \: ~ 1?te.\~'-I.t?A-L $\:v~L 'S"'C\'Z.>Jc..-cu~L LIA)"'~-o\J'( 8~'Lt-I...~$ 2..) f'tt.\~c..\.~",,"L t>W\:'\..L..\."-'c... \.5:. ~OOb I ~yrlf.ox.V--\.A"'t a...., ,~ s.0il....~~ Fu.:t. "'t'rt~ A.?~1:~t.)\ l ~ $10 ~vo6a'l-c. ~a:1' w~\.U-\ \~ \..€fS ""t~~ ~e \POD A-,..r() ~c'l.. l"':>""t'~ i2-E~U\11..t.~~~1: ]) ~6 o'tt\e-e.. I ~c-("''i.'SSA-/l..'( flo?AIZ-1' ~\ c;, +~ ~ 1\fA-(2...l:t--'.~.y\ OJ\:~....,c..L W\LL- ~ L ">'i..~'L~;""'C t Bt.',h~l) "\.\:tE HOl.1~L LL...>Prt..lL-bu-c ~^S.iJ'U.jU1:) s-) A-?~I2.:tM.1.~\ \!. C:,.11-l....."LtL L~,.) I ~Dt> S~IJ~ rt'i-1: ~!> SffL.lt:L~() l~ ~ 'L '-) i),t..\Vc~'1 \.~ I"o..)\\)'t.~ "\'\\~ <....ArtZ-A~L J ~~ 9"e.cr\HC>l,...)(,\ ~O"L~V~~L l"Pci2..~~t" ,) ~IA- Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. ~~ ~'( \.~?A-t..."'( O~ -C~ ~f't.e--C'1 l "1:''':.t..L.E= W\I..L ~l. \:~ AO\')l\:~L S\:C\l~ \~ ~~ ~~'i.f'o\...'l.N\ L\V\~ l.\,. ~LA.. l'c\-c:: f.,...r(\.z,...'L iS~!.""'""'-1.,.s-(' \.~ M...-1J-'\.AO'f H.....\.,~O Pt-<;. "'-f'''ril-''l c.F "'\\:\-€ \"'tt.\.,.:.c......~I'\-L t>wE\..J-\.~L.. ~'i \'~....:rc.S p.r1~iA'i)'f Lw t. ~\.\:\A ~ WI..""CIo:hu \~ \"'~\~"'kL '\:)"","""-Ut..:)L., I \'\:\-0S "D.~E'2..t \~ t.:lC ~'PO\-Cu~L.. \M..I?~\ ()~ f'\J~u..c- S'L.'l-VLc"'z..c.,. "\~ ~"'O\\.\or'-1 O~ \~ S\.ortL. ~ \. \...1..- c..(t.. "i..A-""t L ~ ~c.c.. 't.. <>c; ~ '( p...PAil. \:......... E"f'-J\ p....,...>,.') C-A:(Lv 'L 0 Cl"\ ~ \ 0 So ~ ~ L f=t.t..\ ~ ~ \'tTt (r'Z.l~c..l.J>Io\L OV-)€\...L.\.II..)(.\ I """"C\:\lS. W\\..L.. ~LL-"w A. t-\....Uit.L Lct-\..~&\'6'-t- LJ..Vl....,l, ~t.A: \=t# t--\.'{ pl\-(2'i.I..rc,,>. 3 ,LEGEND o IRDN PIN SET . IRUN PIN FOUND THIS IS TO CERTIFY THA7 AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEy OF THE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PERFOR",m UNDER MY SUPERvISiON; THAT All IMPROVEMENTS AND VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN HEREON. AND THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS By IMPROVEMENTS EI!HER FROM ADJOINING PREMISES OR FROM SUBJECT PREMISES OTHER THAN SHOWN HEREON, TH'S SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND IS SUBJECT TD INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE OISClOSED B~ SuCH, PROPER"rf IS IN F,E,M.A, OEFINED ZONE X (U'NSHAOED), -~ I -', -,[ I', I -", : "--J I _ 1\ ! ~~! \, I 'r..' : ~ C~ i J c'J ....., , '" ~ i ; "'---- ;--"--! \., , '" 1 - :~~~~'~ . ~'\, ~ \ ',- \ \\\, '''-. \, " \, \., \ ' ~-r: 'r' f SECT. r1/0C~~;~~.~/~,'..-;.~(;. 3.3 ./!-'. c. ~ I -"I // //2.47'- LOT 9 ~ ;::; , ---~- /~.'{Cf?E,.1 ;,:Q,=VJ.L ----i ;S'/~~F!!I- - ~ - , HD:::'PELl Tlel/AL EASEAJ/E/'/r --..~ -----, ~j,3, DC; ,.39 ') ~...., - . r-,(..I ~ ~~--j \, ',,- ~ {OT 3D LOT 29 0.900 ACRE \ CURV~ C 1 L=80.43' R= 195.00' 0=23'37'56" T=40, 80 , CH BRG=NI5'24 '55'r CH DiST=79.86' (.J-) L/:."[f;/ l?CXCS' ---_:~~\ ~ _- \ cZ. -:2..'~, ---- '\ --- ;/~::.c rEF! CLEA/\fCUT '~ !1;A'i:L7~: AdA/v/-IDLES M~TF? RIVER OAKS DRIVE 40 I R/W NOTES: 1 OWNERS OF RECORD: RUSSLEN FARMS DEVELOPlviENT, LLC 2 LEGAL REFERENCE PLAT BOOK 28, PG 139 INST, ,#200200760 3. TAX I\~AP NUMBER: 56.03-4-29 4. IRON PINS SET BASED UPON IviONUMEI"TS FOUND ON THE OVt:RALL BOUNDARY OF RiVER OAKS AT RUSSLEN FARMS, SECTION 2. RECORDED iN PLAT BOOK 28. PACE 139. . ~ 5 UNDERGROUND UTILITY SERVICE LINES J!'~'r\.."\ H Of'''~-. ,[- ,-::t-S v,,. .. ~~ ' '?Q~ ! j jS)J.o" \. ~.J..9$1 :-8 BRIAN J)Ct,SELLA ;: :. f-Jo. 002506 ~ .., .. ~ \'Z.'\,O~ :- ..... c.-'- ..)Ii. .-L /~?""- <'0 -t:~ -;;::0-;, -:'"-"<""~~--- /........,. ~C?;>Z- 0~~~~, COr/C. '~~ '-> SP/LL VJ,;'J_)/ /,i-/,r B[>~i'-r'S /,/24<44 ':;9" >'VI/ ; ()6' /"-CP01V COP/:./ER \ \ , I '\.// // '" I ' ,/ ,/ -,----~ _...--i-",,-. (I ~ ""-. I \. / ,-:-:-:-;'--, A '\ / i .....,;1 "'" I' I ~ / 5 lOH/v/i+':: TE/:;" J___--...~ ,'1iLJv~J1CE);t![/v'r ELi SE/vfl~/', T ,-' , I I I I -----~ / \,~ " ! ,,/ / ---,.-/' '- ------------. ! (); 28 ~ " PHYSICAL :~~PROVElv:EI\!T SURVEY FOF, TED A. LENEA VE 2132 RIVER OAKS DRiVE LOT 29, SECTION 2 RIVER OAKS AT RUSSLEN FARMS PLAT BOOK 28. PAGE ',39 CATAWBA ~~AGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE CDUNTY, VIRGINIA SURVEYED D::'CEMBER 1, 2006 ,J08 #P0620542,OO SC\LE: 1" = 40' C .,o---r; ~..I~I+~ ! ~ l_ ~ 1-"-, n~ . to :; I-y ";)</) o v- J -< :30 ~ o o 13 -------- ;;.:;-~-_. ---'----.-----rr-- N ..J1: o 0 00 fcC o F :< a. Zr::. ""0 ~o 20. I wl,u 'C)'> "oz Q f- w -"'~ .... .... ~ v I- !.-.-.--...... r~- !~ \.,. :%: \... :.r i< 1m it- ,;) \0 I :~ , ) 01 ~ '-.D C'Oi o ~ "'~ ~ Zo I ;0 _I:'::: ~J - - ~ ~ ~ r.: 00 Wo COat. ~r ~ 1..1) <:1;: a::- u J-- VI 0- ----~ on ~~ ~~ 1: o o .'Y- l.~ J.: <- (9 r;;\ -r:.- \gJ ~- '--1 0 ~ ~~4.' . vt o ClO _ ~ .I _...... 0 IJ ____ < ~ -~ 3 u 1 ~ M --f}- ...0 W <..J ,~ L. o '. ' I 'tJt ' 4- , u. <---r--:- ~ I ,.,.'..". -I" ..--........ --- -.- -- << o () '" ;:. -J .:( IJ- r a.j-~ ~ <J'oCC ~ ~'O :) _. Cl- Ot.!.. ..... ';"'1 cd z '... ;' ~ 3 \.o.~ :;;0- ;;; D ~ .> \.-l.J _J ~ Q... IJ.. .J I-~ I "" 1: l- Ow L.. VI lJ- -.( ~ ~ (!{ ~._ f.P 4:.:>0 ()- ~'Vro Z::.J -4 >~ .:J~ \u If) ') o J: L.. o I- z o c:: w.. 1.1.1 :> ~~~ ('4) ~ '0 W> \.1-1 _ Z Iu'l ~. 0' ~. -t _J <1.: <n..i <t. 0 .. !---. c-; ~ t/'I iki> .-' '> .. 0,..... ~ --; 'r ~. r..> ~ (... ,._ 6..; 'W" r.J _I l- 0[")..:[,0 ~ ;; if' ...j -, I~.~! > C;~; r. ' ,.;.1. 1-...... LiJ )t.; I.... .([' c::0' I-- : \/) ~ ILli ";';>of ~i o -(j'" tp ._-1 ..... - tu- .1 ,",:,"-~j-----.. _.- ... - ... . I -~'..., '",'-'-..':::':4' 'l. I ..... ,,~.- '- - )~,'. f 'J -... I .~~~ I I , . -'1 -..... \ j ... ;..,...il"'...~';" .... .. ..-... I , ~ 0 --- ZONING ?-I' \ _AG3 _EP _AG1 AR .AV C1 _C2 --- _ C2CVOD JI1 _12 .PGD . PRO _PTD R1 R2 / l~R3 UR4 c Roanoke County Department of Community Development A Applicants Name: Ted Alan Leneave Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: R1S Tax Map Number: 56.03-04-29 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 0.890 Acres 19 March, 2007 o N Scale: 1" = 100' c o ------ Land use _ Conservation r::J Rural Preserve _ Rural Village \;1l1age Center Development Neighborhood Conservation _ Transition _ Core _ Principal lndustria~ IyIGIy G,,/l': t:~11; ~ / o A Applicants Name: Ted Alan Leneave Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: R1S Tax Map Number: 56.03-04-29 Magisterial District: Catawba A rea: 0.890 Acres 19 March, 2007 N Roanoke County Department of Community Development Scale: 1"= 100' - . FROM G~ah~~-Tho~as (TUE)MAV ~ 2007 ~4:0S/ST_ ~4:0a/No_7S000009S4 P 2 May 1 J 2007 Planning Commission County of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke,VA 24018 Re: Application of Kent Alan Leneave - Special Use Permit Dear Chairman and Members: This letter is written on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Russlen Farms Homeowners Association, I nc. to express the position of the Association regarding the application of Mr. Leneave for a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory apartment on his lot. The matter was considered at an informal membershig meeting of the property owners of Russlen Farms held on Sunday afternoon, April 29 . The Board of Directors of the Association, together with the Advisory Board (which is comprised of subdivision residents), met on Monday, April 30th, to consider the matter. The Board of Directors and the Advisory Board are not opposed to the application provided that two conditions are attached to the Special Use Permit. These conditions are: . 1.- That the use of the premises as an accessory apartment be limited to the parents of Mr. Leneave; and 2. That the Speci~1 Use Permit terminate at such time as Mr. Leneave's parents no longer occupy the premises. Russlen Farms is being developed as a very attractive single-family residential neighborhoqd. The membership and Board are not oppo~ed. to proviping for the occupancy of parents of property, ow~ers, but are. certainly oppo~ed to opening up a "can of worms" for "accessory apartments." Ttie~efore, with the ahove conditions, we are not opposed to the granting of the Speciai Use Permit. Jf these conditions are not attached, we would oppose the issuance of such Special Use Permit. Very truly yours, RUSSLEN FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. By AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT ON A 0.9 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 2132 RIVER OAKS DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 56.03-4-29) CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF TED ALAN LeNEAVE WHEREAS, Ted Alan LeNeave has filed a petition for a special use permit to construct an accessory apartment located at 2132 River Oaks Drive (Tax Map No. 56.03-4-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on April 24, 2007; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 22,2007. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ted Alan LeNeave to construct an accessory apartment located at 2132 River Oaks Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 0-~ PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: Richard & Judy Wagner 5-5/2007 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 1, 2007 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 22, 2007 BOS 1st Reading 4/24/07 A. REQUEST Rezone 0.369 acre from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to C-1, Office District, for the operation of a beauty salon located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Nine citizens spoke in opposition to the request. The key issues emphasized by neighbors were existing traffic conditions and crash rates at the three Green Valley subdivision access points on Colonial Avenue, new residential construction nearby in both the city and county, the incompatibility of the use proposed with surrounding residences, the necessity of preventing Colonial from becoming another Brambleton Avenue, relevancy of the BrambJeton Studio trip generation study to this request, stormwater problems, rear yard parking practicality, interior building permit revocation and that the bordering Neighborhood Conservation properties cannot be adequately protected if this request is approved. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Timothy Beard presented the staff report. Mr. McNeil asked jf VDOT would require a minimum distance for vehicle stacking from the Green Valley Drive - Colonial Avenue intersection back to the proposed rear yard entrance (no minimum requirement) and noted the differences in accessing Brambleton Studio (open parking area directly facing the street) relative to the Green Valley Drive site. Mr. Azar asked if there were any real differences between this request and last year's, (mainly, the reduction in number of employees proffered), how many other sites have been converted along Colonial Avenue without direct access (none) and Mr. Thomason verified that the parking area would provide one space per customer and one space per employee. Mr. Wagner stated that employees at the Colonial site would be "independent contractors" and that the new operation would be a specialty business where clients would spend a long time onsite thereby holding down the number of vehicle trips to and from the property. Mr. Azar noted that, in his opinion, the property is already zoned correctly and that a change such as the applicants' proposal would negatively impact the existing neighborhood. Mr. Thomason stated that Colonial Avenue traffic will only increase in light of new residential construction underway, (particularly the approximately 230 homes planned for the city's Colonial Green adjacent to Sunscape Apartments). Mr. McNeil explained that this is the second time for this proposal, that several meetings have been held at which citizens expressed their strong opposition and that the Green Valley Drive - Colonial Avenue intersection traffic circulation is crucial to getting residents to and from their homes. D. CON DITIONS The applicant has offered the following proffered conditions: 1. The subject property shall be developed in accord with the site plan dated January 10, 2006 and revised March 14,2007. 2. The carport will be enclosed and no other expansion will be made. 3. Colonial Avenue will not be used for ingress and egress to the property. 4. A qualified engineer will design a stormwater management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to. 5. The building will be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetology (the cosmetic treatment of skin, hair and nails). 6. The building will be occupied by a maximum of 5 (five) licensed cosmetologists providing personal services to their clients. 7. The salon will be open from 9:30 am until 8:30 pm Monday through Saturday. 8. Any outdoor lighting will be installed in accord with the Colonial Avenue Development Plan so as not to be offensive to neighbors. 9. There will be no offsite parking on Green Valley Drive. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. McNeil motioned to deny the request. The motion carried 3-0. Ms. Hooker and Mr. Jarrell were not in attendance. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Petitioner: Richard and Judy Wagner Request: Rezone 0.369 acre from R-1 Low Density Residential to C-1 Commercial with conditions for the operation of a beauty salon Location: 3722 Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring Proffered Conditions: 1. The subject property shall be developed in accord with the site plan dated January 10,2006 and revised March 14,2007. 2. The carport will be enclosed and no other expansion will be made. 3. Colonial Avenue will not be used for ingress and egress to the property. 4. A qualified engineer will design a stormwater management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to. 5. The building will be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetology (the cosmetic treatment of skin, hair and nails). 6. The building will be occupied by a maximum of 5 (five) licensed cosmetologists providing personal services to their clients. 7. The salon will be open from 9:30 am until 8:30 pm Monday through Saturday. 8. Any outdoor lighting will be installed in accord with the Colonial Avenue Development Plan so as not to be offensive to neighbors. 9. There will be no offsite parking on Green Valley Drive. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a petition by Richard and Judy Wagner to rezone a 0.369 acre parcel in order to convert a residence into a beauty shop. The facility would provide space for five employees providing hair, nail and skin care. Considered a personal service by the zoning ordinance, the proposal is limited with moderate compatibility by the Community Plan's Transition future land use designation that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels while discouraging intense, highway oriented commercial uses. A very similar proposal by the applicants was denied by the Board of Supervisors one year ago for the same location due to the importance of residential neighborhood preservation and increased traffic concerns. Other problematic site issues include parking, exterior lighting, screening and buffering, signage and stormwater management. As in 2006, staff is not in support of this request, but lists suggested conditions on the last page of this report should the Planning Commission favorably recommend the petition. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The zoning ordinance defines personal services as business establishments engaged in the provision of frequently or recurrently needed services of a personal nature. Personal services are permitted by right in the C-l district. Examples identified include beauty and barber shops, pet grooming, seamstress and tailor shops, shoe repair shops, florists, laundromats and dry cleaners. Stormwater management regulations will apply to any changes involving the exterior of the site. 1 Minimum Standard 19 of the V irginia Erosion & Sediment Control regulation provides for the protection of properties and waterways downstream from development sites. Roanoke County ordinance 12390-7 lays out more stringent criteria for erosion and sedimentation practices. Building code requirements regarding change of use must be met in addition to Americans with Disabilities (ADA) standards relative to modifications to the existing building. On December 11, 2006, Mr. Wagner was issued a building permit to upgrade the residence's interior for future use. The permit was revoked on April 6,2007, after inspections by the Building Commissioner's office and zoning enforcement indicated that work performed inside the structure was outside the scope of that for residential purposes and was not fully described on the application. It was also evident that the project was undervalued and that a true total value of the project was not provided. No further work beyond what is necessary to preserve and protect the building from the elements is allowed until a new permit with verifiable information is secured per the Building Commissioner. The building code mandates that a building be evaluated by design professionals for both structural adequacy and code compliance before a change of use occurs. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - Judy and Richard Wagner purchased the subject property prior to making the 2006 rezoning attempt. By proffer, "the carport is to be enclosed, but no other expansion will be made." The existing structure footprint of approximately 1 ,484 square feet will not be increased; the parcel contains an estimated 16,000 square feet. Per Real Estate Department records, the one- story residence was constructed in 1956. The site has been zoned R-l Residential dating back at least to 1960. TopographvNegetation - Two of the corner lot's deciduous trees formerly facing Green Valley Drive have been removed over the past year and would be replaced in addition to providing new plantings per ordinance. Older deciduous trees parallel Colonial Avenue. A serpentine brick wall stands along the east side property line. Deciduous vegetation and one large evergreen tree are found along the rear border. The grass yard is generally flat excluding well-defined ditches paralleling both Colonial Avenue and Green Valley Drive. Surrounding Neighborhood - In addition to the petitioners' property, adjoining parcels to the south, west across Green Valley Drive and north across Colonial Avenue are developed with R-l zoned single family residences. A C-l Special Use, conditionally zoned accounting office operates east of the Wagner site. General retail, personal service, professional office and club facilities are also found in the vicinity. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout! Architecture - The proposed use would be limited to the existing building footprint. The project architect states that the owners wish to close all existing doors and construct a new primary entrance door at the carport facing the rear yard. Such single access may be permitted pending verification that the building has an occupant load and travel distance that are less than the maximums allowed for facilities with one exit. Colonial Avenue Corridor design guidelines call for the maintenance of existing structures' scale and front facing Colonial Avenue, avoidance of excessive height and the use of earth tones for any changes to exterior materials. A concept plan bearing revised date of March 14, 2007, has been proffered indicating the proposed access for pedestrians with ADA ramp and handrail and four parking spaces for the handicapped. Only one handicap-accessible parking space is required in this case. 16 parking spaces are proposed 2 which cannot be accommodated onsite under the configuration shown. Also shown is a stormwater "detention tube" proposed parallel to the building under several parking spaces nearest to Colonial Avenue. Corridor design guidelines recommend alternative surface materials such as pervious pavement to mitigate existing drainage problems and to prevent additional problems. The ordinance minimum 20-foot wide buffer yard with Type B, Option 2 screening and plantings are noted on the concept plan along the rear boundary. As noted by the Zoning Administrator, "the number of parking spaces will require pavement and storm water management measures. The site may not be able to handle the number of spaces due to development requirements. Spaces adjacent to (brick) wall are tight and backup/turnaround movements may be a concern. Lights are not consistent with the adjacent use.. .photometric plan is essential to review lighting impacts on the neighborhood." Design guidelines call for light fixtures to be compatible with the existing residential character, placements no taller than 14 feet in height, path lighting where appropriate and keeping light sources out of view from adjoining residential areas. Per ordinance, intensity shall not exceed 0.5 footcandle at adjacent streets and residential properties with glare prohibited. Accessffraffic Circulation - The site's only existing vehicular access is at Green Valley Drive approximately 150 feet from its intersection with Colonial Avenue. The new proposed drive is proposed 120 feet from Colonial Avenue. Per VDOT, the posted speed limit on Green Valley Drive is 25 miles per hour with a minimum of 280 feet of sight distance required. Sight distance appears adequate and information regarding drainage system modifications in the right-of-way of Colonial Avenue will be reviewed as part of the commercial entrance permitting procedure. A trip generation study of conditions at Brambleton Studio (a similar, larger operation run by the petitioners on the busy Roanoke City arterial) was performed to gauge potential additional traffic impacts at the Colonial/Green Valley Drive intersection. This study projected that a five-station salon would generate five total trips during the mid-day peak hour and 10 total trips during the evening peak hour. The county's Transportation Engineering Manager states that "additional information should be provided to establish the number of clients actually being served during the peak hours since this information may affect the number of site trips. In addition, please provide an estimate of total daily site trips for the subject development.. . (further) comments pending receipt of a traffic study. If approved, the proposed access should be located as far southeast of the Colonial A venue/Green Valley Drive intersection as feasible and adequate horizontal and vertical sight distances be reserved at the proposed entrance." The proposed salon would increase traffic loads on each street, particularly at peak hour times and would generate total daily trips over a proffered II-hour workday far in excess of that expected from a single family residence. The 2005 Annual Average Daily Traffic estimate for Green Valley Drive was 740 vehicles; Colonial Avenue's 2005 AADT was 9,900 vehicles. Crash data provided by county Police indicate that a total of 111 crashes were reported at Colonial A venue's intersecti ons with Manassas Drive (51), Green Valley Drive (7), Thompsons Lane (9), Lanewood Drive (8), Poplar Drive (26) and Overdale Road (10) over the period January 2000 through March 2007. Stacking space on Green Valley Drive will accommodate six vehicles from the Colonial Avenue intersection south to the proposed new entrance. Fire & RescuelUtilities - Emergency vehicle travel time is within acceptable limits with Cave Spring Fire and Rescue squads as the primary response units. Public water and sewer are available. Fire and Rescue Department staff report that two additional fire prevention inspections will occur at county businesses annually. Stormwater Management - The proffered concept plan indicates a "stormwater detention tube (under lot) - exact size not determined" to account for parking area drainage. Also proffered is 3 the statement "a qualified engineer will design a stormwater management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to." Staff recommends that any new parking surface be constructed of pervious materials. Surface methods will utilize trees, shrubs and groundcover to manage runoff. Screening & Buffering - Type B screening and buffering is indicated along the rear border with adjacent R-l zoned property. The 20-foot wide buffer is shown; additional plantings will be needed to supplement existing plant material. The ordinance requires one large and two small trees for each 50 linear feet in addition to three shrubs for every 10 feet and a six-foot high screen. Right-of-way street side plantings are also required along Green Valley Drive including one small tree each 20 linear feet and two shrubs for every five feet of frontage within a 10- foot wide planting strip. Paved parking areas exceeding 500 square feet shall have one landscaped island for each 750 square feet of landscaped area to channel traffic and define parking areas. At least 50 percent of all plantings shall be native and healthy existing vegetation should be incorporated into the landscape plan. Neighborhood Meeting - On April 4, 2007, citizens met to provide the Wagners' an opportunity to discuss the proposal. Topics included the types of cosmetological services proposed, number of work stations, average amount oftime needed per type of service, the status of the owners' interior building permit, expected traffic increases, crash rates at Colonial Avenue's intersections in the immediate area, onsite lighting, on- and offsite parking, neighborhood drainage problems and, most important to the neighbors, why the Wagners' insist on trying to rezone the site against overwhelming opposition. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN This site is designated Transition by the 2005 Community Plan. Transition policy encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels with a high degree of architectural and environmentally sensitive site design for office, institutional, higher density residential, park and small-scale coordinated retail uses while serving as buffers between highways and adjacent lower intensity land uses. Neighborhood Conservation (adjoining on the south) delineates areas where established single family neighborhoods are in place and conservation of the existing pattern is encouraged. Single family neighborhoods are traditionally the most protected land uses. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Community Plan land use policy specific to neighborhoods advocates preserving the stability of residential areas by discouraging the intrusion of incompatible uses and encouraging the maintenance and enhancement of older neighborhoods recognizing that these homes provide a valuable source of affordable housing to the community. This proposal represents the highest intensity redevelopment proposed in the Colonial Avenue corridor east of Route 419 since the Roanoke Council of Garden Clubs project was approved for C-l use in early 2004 and the Irvine Access Floors request was granted in May, 2005. Quoting Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines, "as commercial pressures increase, the importance of protecting established neighborhoods and ensuring the safe and efficient flow of traffic becomes more crucial." The basic goal of the design guidelines is "to plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along the corridor." In addition to traffic impacts, parking, stormwater management, screening and buffering, signage and exterior lighting are all critical to this proposal's compatibility with surrounding land uses, particularly insuring maintenance of the residential character of the immediate area. 4 Staff is of the opinion that the nature of this proposal is of such intensity that compatibility with surrounding land uses cannot be achieved. However, if the Planning Commission is in support of the request, it is recommended that the petitioners' proffers not be accepted and that the following proffered conditions be considered: 1. The building shall be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetic services including hair, skin and nail treatment. 2. The building shall be occupied by a maximum of five employees. 3. The carport shall be enclosed and no other expansion shall occur. 4. Colonial A venue shall not be utilized for ingress and egress to the property. 5. Stormwater management shall be addressed through use of a pervious parking surface and any other methods deemed necessary through the site plan review process. 6. Hours of operation shall be limited to 9:30 am until 8:30 pm Monday through Saturday. 7. Signage shall be limited to one maximum 35 square-foot monument sign. 8. Applicable Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines shall be in effect as determined during the site plan review process. 9. The maximum number of parking spaces shall not exceed 12 including one each for the disabled and for loading/unloading. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: 5 - 5/2007 Timothy Beard PC: 5/112007 BOS: 5/22/2007 Rezoning Application Aerial Photograph Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Colonial A venue Reported Crash Data Notice of Permit Revocation Consultant's Code/Change of Use Letter R -1 District Regulations C-l District Regulations Trip Generation Study (Brambleton Studio) 5 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl ~2 OlOOU:)"') Date received:--, ..-' j , .? I j /Z-li::7 Received by~ \,,-\) 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 AP~ILCY\tiO 1 fee:, ' ,', (" , \ \, " PC/BZA date 5' 2Lh7 Placards issued: BOS dale: Case Number -- J- ~ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip tf[c~P -f ~u.l)i. tti;46N€'fZ. 7't S // PxJ/tK c/( ,<<::4.v d. T 1?101J €'.174 Vff;;?t.k:zr Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No_: ~ If 0 .- S Sf.,. -- Z b (; (.) !?~- .7/lf 1.1'3 'I.:;; 2<fc 7.7./ ~ ;;2cJ '-il Owner's name/address w/zip '>4717 E. Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Size ofparcel(s): Acres: ~ '7{, ,. Magisterial District: C /k.; (:_ Corrununity Planning area: CI1l~ .5' /ZIIJG Existing Zoning: P?..t-:'>'tl)EJ!' h A- '- If I Existing Land Use: Uc.E.s,. IJ-~"f, /j-L fC/ Property Location .;3 7 :;).?. C!. ~ L-o ,v (19-L /l-u E- Keiflrt~D~E Ut1- d2. cj61 S" r Tax Map No.: 77 pig -3 -. '31 REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN(15.2-2232)REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/SIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: C-I i7~Au -r ~,v Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes:M No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~. No 0 IF NO, A V ARlANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes M No 0 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALAPPLICANTS (VIWIAA) Variance/Waiver ofSection(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE- RJsrw/CP V/AA RJSrwlCP V/AA RJSrw/CP V/AA 00 Consultation ~ 8 1/2" xII" concept plan ~ Application fee Application -y", Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ., Justification Water and sewer application 'I.. Adjoining property owners I hereby certifY that I am either the owner ofthe prope or the own, er, 's ~ent ozontract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. :".J /J. ! {IJ )(1 ufitL~. / . It ,l;:- Owner's Signature v/i/;6;ft'zr-. / 2 / -,,/ JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR WAIVER REQUEST Applicant Judy Taylor Wagner (3722 Colonial Avenue - Tax Map No. 077.18.03-31) The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The C-1 District permits personal service uses. These uses include beauty shops. Such uses are appropriately found along major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and where commercial zoning has been established. Such is true in this area of Colonial Avenue. The use is consistent with the transition and core land use categories of the County Development Plan. The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and the Colonial Avenue Development Plan permit uses of this nature. Please explain how the project confonns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and the Colonial Avenue Development Plan permit such uses when done in a manner which is appropriate in order to preserve the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. The entrance from Green Valley Drive prohibits ingress and egress on Colonial Avenue, which is in accord with the plans. The screening and buffering protect the residential property to the rear. This property is fronted on Colonial Avenue in an area where almost all properties along Colonial Avenue are commercially zoned. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The rezoning will have no negative impact on adjoining properties and the surrounding areas and no negative impact on the provision of public services. The entrance to the property on Green Valley Drive will remove ingress and egress issues from Colonial Avenue. Adequate screening and buffering, as called for in the Colonial Avenue Development Plan, will be provided with the development. U:\zONINGIWagner- Taylor\JUSTIFICA TION,doc Rezoning request for 3722 Colonial Ave. This will be our second attempt at getting the subject property rezoned from R-l to C-l. When the Board of Supervisors last heard this request, problems with traffic on Green Valley Drive and parking at the proposed site were major factors in their decision to deny the request. Originally, we planned to have at least 8 rental station in the new salon with a total of 12 parking spaces including two handicap spaces. Our new plan will be to limit the studio to a maximum of 5 rental stations. We have also increased our parking spaces from 12 to 16. I have requested HSMM to do a comparative traffic study at our salon on Brambleton, to give us a much better estimate of the number of trips that could be expected at the new salon. The two salons are very similar in the type of customer, the length of stay, and the normal in and out times. Although Brambleton is a much busier salon (we have 14 stations there), I feel this study will be a helpful comparison. Regarding the ongoing remodeling at The Colonial Ave house, I have been upgrading numerous things that would, in my opinion, need to be accomplished whether the property is rezoned or remains residential. The kitchen and bath both have to be remodeled, the 50 year old ungrounded and cloth coated wiring is a fire hazard, and most ofthe plumbing is antiquated. In addition, enclosing the carport adds value and a better look to the property. Finally, let me add that my wife and I are confident that this is an ideal location for our business. Weare dedicated to improving the overall appearance of the property be it for business or residence. ---.-.----, I j I I I I I I I I I I J I , I I t r ----------------------.--------->- --~-_._--.~---~._-_._-_.- ---. COLONIAL AVE .-~._.-._.--_._-_.-._---~---- ." I / I I t J~-Ge I cD 0~i o C) ;:0 m m Z < >- r- r- m -< o ;:0 < m t--- GaLOH',A,l" ....VEM.e H.#.IR ~ -".-11" P"'~ID1 ""'.I6-OS-"DD-OQQO AD...JAGeNT PROPERlY ZONED C.-I STOIOM __ oeTemCl< 'IUI!II! ~ I..DfI . ~T~NOT ~- If., --...--- '....~~ :J ADA ?AGeS o I ~@. : 00000000000 l_ 1!XlST1!6 ~ ~ fW,.L :lO" __ . T'I"l"I! " - 0I"T1QM "T AD..JAGENT f'ROPERlY ZONED 1'1.-1 .---'--1.-.-.--------- I I I I I I J I I I I SG.AI..!:. 1.~ CONCEPT SITE PLAN COLONIAL AVENUE HAIR SALON Rife + Wood ARCHITECTS 1\<>000.', V ^ NOll (l4~) J4.4-W15 31::1:2 GOI..ONI,A,l"....ve RO....NOKl:. v.... 3:.OLE ~TE/() ~ft-rJ/)f+!' ::{oQf..., -"" O~ 14 IfJ (f fLC /I 2.00"7 ,...... J5P ~ ~f'o'iS'ON ^!> NOreD PROFFERS The undersigned owner does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with the rezoning request: 1. The subject property will be developed in accordance with the Site Plan dated 10 January, 2006 and revised 14 March 2007. 2. The carport is to be enclosed, but no other expansion will be made. 3. Colonial Avenue will not be utilized for ingress and egress to the subject property. 4. A qualified engineer will design a storm water management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to. 5. The building will be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetology (the cosmetic treatment of skin, hair and nails). 6. The building will be occupied by a maximum of 5 (five) licensed cosmetologists providing personal services to their clients. 7. The salon will be open from 9:30 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. Monday thru Saturday. 8. Any outdoor lighting will be installed in accordance with the Colonial A venue Development Plan so as not to be offensive to neighbors. 9. There will be no off site parking on Green Valley Drive. Owner c{E!~ 4!~z= Owner ~ ? .... '. /' .>/ ~ t"/ I I I ~. I ~'" c _ Conservation _ Rural Preserve _ Rural Village 'wlllage Center Development Neighborhood Conservation _ Tra'lSl1ion _ Core _ Principal Industrial C Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Richard and Judy Wagner Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: C1 Tax Map Number: 77.18-03-31 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.369 Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1" = 100' A c ZONING c\ /' _ AG3 .EP .AG1 / AR _AV C1 _C2 _ C2CVOO L..;J 11 _12 _PCD Ell PRO .PTD R1 R2 L...JR3 _R4 e Roanoke County Department of Community Development N A Applicants Name: Richard and Judy Wagner Existing Zoning: R1 Proposed Zoning: C1 Tax Map Number: 77.18-03-31 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.369 Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1" = 100' '0 c:: Q) I'll '0 - .... ~ r- ~ E go 1:: N'O I'll .c c.. ..... I'll Q) III CO) .... Ct:J:C Q) 0 ~ III o c.. I'll I'll ~~~~ C._'i'll >.CO C _alOI'll C'OO~ ::::l'- N o S - c l)<(.....81 Q) ~ ::t .:.:: I'll '" o ::::l Q) C coO I'll I'll > (i ""')<( ~ C o o l) ro -l-' o I- il~ fl~ ;i]~ u~ :fl~ fl~ il~ ~~ """ """ """ .- .- .- ~ O"J ~ C\J C\J O"J co ~ "" ~ C'\J ~ 10 "" r- a a ~ "" C\J C'\J a ~ co a a C\J (") a C\J a "" a a a a ~ a a a o l.O "" O"J (") "" C\J O"J ~ to to o "" l() "" "" "" a a "" l.O N C\J l() C\J C\J ~ "" ~ l() a a a a a a "" a ("') to a a a a "" C\J a a a ~ C'\J a a ~ a C\J >- W ....J Cf) ....J 0 Cf) W Z Z -J 4: 0 Cf) '4: ....J cr 0 0 ~ > 0 '4: (j) 4: 0:: <( !(j) Cf) Z S 'Cf) (j) 0 '4: ....J 0.. 0.. :2: w w 4: 4: 0:: ....J ::J :2 :2 0 w z z z W 0.. 0.. 0 0 -J 0:: 4: 4: 4: > 0 0 I I 0 l') ....J :2 :2 0 0.. 0.. f- f- ro () ...... 0 I-- Qlauntt! of ~oanok.e DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING PERMITS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS MAPPING/GIS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR, ARNOLD COVEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, TAREK MONEIR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, PHILIP THOMPSON COUNTY ENGINEER, GEORGE W. SIMPSON, III, PE, BUILDING COMMISSIONER, JOEL S. BAKER, CBO NOTICE OF PERMIT REVOCATION DATE: April 6, 2007 APPLICANT: Richard W. Wagner 78 Spinnaker Run Court Moneta, VA 24121 LOCATION: 3722 Colonial Avenue, Permit # B-0602954 Section110.7 of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code allows the building official to revoke a permit issued under an application containing any false statement, misrepresentation of fact or incorrect information supplied by the applicant. An inspection of the above referenced project by this office indicates that the work being performed is outside the scope of that forresidential work and was not fully described on the permit application. It is also evident that the project was undervalued on the application and that a true total value of the project was not provided. Based on this information, the permit is hereby revoked and no further work beyond what may be necessary to preserve and protect the structure from the elements may be performed. No further work may be performed until a new permit is secured and the information is verified. P.O. BOX 29800 · ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 . PHONE (540) 772-2080 . FAX (540) 772-2108 @ Recycled Paper ; 1/t1 E~ D (ltJ/y 1326 Grandin Road Roanoke, VA 24015 Rife + Wood ARCHITECTS March 30, 2007 Mr. Richard Wagner 78 Spinnaker Run Moneta, VA 24121 RE: Colonial Avenue Hair Salon 3722 Colonial Avenue Dear Mr. Wagner, The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a preliminary list of issues, pursuant to the 2003 Uniform Statewide Building Code, which may be required as a result of a Change in Use of the existing residence into a commercial use. The building code requires that prior to a Change of Use; the owner must have the building evaluated for both structural adequacy and code compliance. The structural evaluation must be performed by a registered professional engineer. The code compliance evaluation must also be performed by design professional such as an architect or engineer. Once these evaluations have been completed, they must be submitted to the Roanoke County Building Department for approval. Handicapped accessible parking and an accessible route from these parking spaces to the primary building entrance must be provided. It appears that this can be accomplished by the placement of a hard surface sidewalk extending from the accessible parking area to an accessible ramp that leads to the primary accessible entrance to the building. The approximate elevation change from the proposed parking area to the existing finished floor elevation of the building and new finished floor elevation of the carport is fifteen inches. This elevation change will require a ramp of approximately fifteen feet in length, not including the required landings. Once access to the building has been provided, an accessible route from the primary entrance to the primary function areas must be obtained. The existing exterior door leading from the carport to the existing kitchen area must have thirty-four inches of clear opening width. It appears that the required width of the opening can be accomplished by removing the existing door, frame, and brick mould in their entirety, thus providing an accessible route to the primary function areas. tel: (540) 344-6015 fax (540) 344-5982 Mr. Richard Wagner Page 2 March 30, 2007 The new non-accessible toilet that is being proposed to be located in the existing kitchen area should be located to provide a minimum thirty-six inches of clearance between the stair and the toilet room walls. This minimum distance is required to provide accessible access to one of the primary function areas. The existing residential toilet will be required to be modified to accommodate handicapped accessible toilet fixtures and clearances, including but not limited to the water closet, lavatory, and grab bars. In addition to the providing of accessible toilet fixtures, the required maneuvering clearances, including the toilet room door clearances shall be provided to accommodate the accessibility requirements. This requirement may necessitate the relocation of interior partitions, relocation and widening of the existing door, and relocation of the existing toilet fixture plumbing. The existing corridor that leads from the primary function area to the accessible toilet is thirty- six inches in width and meets the width requirements for a conidor served by less than 30 occupants. There are currently three entrances to the existing building, the original front entrance door facing Colonial A venue, a rear door facing the rear yard, and a side door facing Green Valley Drive. It is our understanding that you wish to close the three doors listed above and provide a new primary entrance door to be located at the existing carport, facing the rear yard. It appears that the existing three entrances may be closed and a new single entrance provided due the facility having an occupant load and a travel distance that are less than the maximums allowed for buildings with one exit. In addition to the requirements listed above and any requirements imposed by Roanoke County as a result of the potential rezoning, storm water management will be required to be provide for the increase in impervious area resulting from the proposed additional parking. It appears that adequate storm water management can be provided to accommodate the increase in storm water runoffby use of an adequately designed surface or subsurface detention structure. In an effort to minimize the impact of the additional impervious areas, you may want to consider the use of pervious modular paving systems in lieu of asphalt paving. Although the pervious paving systems will not eliminate the need for storm water management, it can potentially reduce the size of the storm water management facility. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance. SEe. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose. (A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low-middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the community plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant,these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, S If., 4-27-99) Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single-Family Dwelling, Attached * Single-Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *) 2. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor 3. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30- 19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Alternative Discharging Sewage System * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Multiple Dog Permit * 3. Civic Uses Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 3.5. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, S II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, SS 3, 8,6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493- 8, S 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10,6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, S 2,4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, S II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, S 1, 7-26-05) Sec. 30-4 I -3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A)Minimum lot requirements. I. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B)Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. 5. The expansion of a legally established nonconforming structure into the required side or rear yard shall be permitted provided the expansion does not encroach into the required yard any greater than the existing encroachment. (C)Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D)Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293~ 12, ~ 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, ~ 8,4-26-94) SEC. 30-53. C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT. Sec. 30-53-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the C-1 Office District is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county-wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses. Retail uses are permitted, to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 Office District are generally consistent with the recommendations forth in the Transition and Core land use categories of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residentia/ Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi-family Dwelling * Two-family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Communications Services Personal Services Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30- 19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major * 2. Office Uses Laboratories 3. Commercial Uses Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation 4. Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, 92,8-24-93; Ord. No. 042799-11,92,4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, 9 1, 4-22-03) Sec. 30-53-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A)Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B)Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet on anyone side, with a combined total on both sides of at least 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind the front building line, or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C)Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet. (D)Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, S 10, 6-22-93) I HSMM \ AECO~J1 I TRIP GENERATION STUDY Brambleton Studio HSMM Commission 30204 April 6, 2007 Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Study Purpose...... ...... ..... ..... ........ .......... .............. .......... ... ....... ................. .....1 2.0 Existing Salon.......... .... ....... .... ..... ..... ......... ............................. ..... .... ......... .................... ..... ........2 3.0 Observed Existing Volumes....... ....... ... ...... ..... .............. .... ..... ..... ...... .... ............... ............. ........2 4.0 Trip Generation Rates for Existing Brambleton Studio ............................................................3 5.0 Trip Generation for the Proposed Colonial Avenue Site......,....................................................4 List of Figures Figure 1 - Location Map..... ..... ...... .... .......... .......... .... ......... ........................ ........ .......... ........... ........ 1 Figure 2 - Existing Mid-Day Peak Hour Traffic Volume ...............................................................2 Figure 3 - Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume ........................................................................3 Appendices Appendix A- Existing Traffic Counts (April 4, 2007) HSlvIM., Inc. April 6, 2007 Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study 1.0 Introduction and Study Purpose Richard Wagner is the owner of Brambleton Studio, a beauty salon located at 2937 Brambleton Avenue in Roanoke County. He has proposed creating a similar but smaller studio at a location less than a mile away at the comer of Colonial Avenue and Green Valley Drive, also in Roanoke County. As part ofthe rezoning application review, the Virginia Department of Transportation and Roanoke County are interested in the traffic impacts of the proposed studio. Typical1raffic impact studies are based on trip generation productions from multiple studies of similar facilities of various sizes and numerous locations. The most commonly used resource for these studies is the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, currently in its 7tl1 Edition. This book contains data on trips for a variety of land uses; however, no appropriate rate for a stand alone beauty salon is included. Therefore, determining the traffic impact of the proposed salon required a specific study of a similar facility in the local area. This report documents the methodology, findings, and conclusions of that study, and is intended to provide realistic estimates of the number of trips expected to be generated by the proposed studio during the mid-day and evening peak periods. This information should assist VDOT and Roanoke County in their evaluation of the proposed rezoning. Figure 1 depicts the location of the existing Brambleton Studio. // \, .~. .........X ~)/ ... /~,f \~ "~/~/ / ~ ;' ~ '~-;10 v"" '11 ". &~,,(; ~ \,Jty - \1~.. ....a.-~~vv~~y........ \ "or \ ~ ~ ./(8 .,It.. . oo'Q ""'# J f I, Figure 1- Location Map HSMM, Inc. 1 April 6, 2007 Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study 2.0 Existing Salon The existing Brambleton Studio includes 14 total work stations with 12 work stations being designated for hair services and 2 work stations being used for nail services. Each of the work stations are occupied by independent contractors. There are 21 parking spaces available for the Brambleton Studio. 3.0 Observed Existing Volumes Turning movement counts were collected by HSMM on April 4th, 2007 at the Brambleton Studio. As this week falls before Easter, the salon was relatively busy, with all hair cutting stations actively serving customers, so the observed traffic generation should be on the high end (i.e. conservative end) of the expected range. These volumes were collected to quantify existing entering and exiting volumes for the mid-day and PM peak hour for Brambleton Studio. The data was collected by an HSMM employee who observed the driveway of the studio and recorded entering and exiting traffic and tabulated the results for each 15 minute period between 11 :20 am to 1:30 pm and again from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. As a backup documentation of these counts, videotapes of the entrance drive were made during these count periods. These can be made available for review if requested. During the mid-day peak hour (11 :30 to 12:30) there were a total of 15 trips generated with forty-seven percent of those trips entering (7) and fifty-three percent of the trips exiting (8). The PM peak hour (4:00 to 5:00) yielded 27 total trips with 67% entering (18) and 33% exiting (9). The existing peak hour trip distributions are depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The turning movement count data collection sheets for this project are included in Appendix A. 8RA~1BLITQi\i STliDIQ TO FLOYD COUNTY 8PPJ~BLt!ON AvE., " ", 6 2 ....J LL* --1 ~ C@) SWEtTtJRIl,R AVE t:IJ C (") r: ?i ;0 .;JJ p / ,I / Figure 2-Existing Mid-Day Peak Hour Traffic Volumes HSMM, Inc. 2 April 6, 2007 Brarnbleton Studio Trip Generation Study 8RAf~BLEfbN STUDiO ... TO FlOYD 'COUNTY 63 ., ~LL7 -.J.. n @J BRAivf81ETON AVe . ~.. . S\:vEEfBHJAR AVE. ill C .n A' z fT1 ,;). ,;;0 .!J. / / Figure 3 -Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4.0 Trip Generation Rates for Existing Brambleton Studio Trip generation rates were computed using the previously discussed driveway counts for Brambleton Studio during the mid-day and PM peak hours. Since the traffic COllilts were obtained during a holiday week (Easter), the volUmes represent a higher more conservative approach than a typical work day. With 15 trips for 14 stations, the generation rate is slightly over 1 trip per station for the midday peak (with 7 trips or 47% entering and 8 trips or 53% exiting). With about 27 trips for 14 stations, the generation rate is just below 2 trips per station for the p.m. peak: (with 18 trips or 67% entering and 9 trips or 33% exiting). Trip Generationis delineated in Table 4.1. This produces approximately 1 trip per work station in the mid-day peak hour and less than 2 trips per work station in the PM peak hour. 5.0 Projected Trip Generation for Colonial Avenue Site Based on the trip generation rates for the existing Brambleton Studio of one (1) trip per station in the midday peak and two (2) trips per station in the pm peak:, the expected number of total trips for the proposed 5 station Colonial Avenue site is about 5 (about 2 entering and 3 exiting) in the midday peak and about lOin the evening peak (about 7 entering and 3 exiting). This equates to one vehicle entering every nine (9) minutes and one vehicle leaving every twenty minutes. HSMM, Inc. 3 April 6, 2007 Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study Appendix A HS1\1M' Traffic Count Worksheets April 4, 2007 HSMM, Inc. A-I April 6, 2007 Trip Generation Study Brambleton Studib Today's Date 4A~ 2007 Weather Conditions OVe,rCA'ST Traffic Counter (HSMM) C"",lY' DAvIS Time (Noon Peak) [: ~11:30 11:30-11:45 11 :45-12:00 12:00-12: 15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 12:45-1 :00 1:00-1: 15 1:15-1:30 ~l 20.l0 " t u11L .A0SEO "POtW..s'f'IIW~ -..~ -- 6- Approach FI'CD,,",\ NB TO (Brambleton Studios) .pf!OM SB 70 (Brambleton Studios) Entering Exiting Entering Exiting TOTAL b1+en~ ~...... tJQ n-OM 55 1 9 liP To .f-A' 1 &'TlIJ~ 7bN3 T~ sB (p " 11 "', _:...~ L \:'" 'f'\' ", - -:; .,.j,,---\'-. 'j --( t:LOVO Trip Generation Study Brambleton Studio Today's Date -4 ~Pf{}L LOD 7 Weather Conditions JlJr!flY/ f1Jet'L'!L.J.. Traffic Counter (HSMJvf) C H' 9 DlIVl'.:.S. 1)[).0Ll-rbL\~ --:4J .~ -y:: -, ~ 1 Approach r'r Time NB SB (PM Peak) (Brambleton Studios) (Brambleton Studios) Exiting Entering Exiting Entering 3:30-3:45 3:45-4:00 4:004:15 4:154:30 4:304:45 UU 'liP 4:45-5:00 II t 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 5:30-5 :45 5:45-6:00 6:00-6:15 6: 15-6:30 1 D1AI.. (m (t\E.l::> \ 01 ~L f-f.- \1") ----.) \\ 2.0 ~ "1> 2.4 @ ~ -. FlD'fD AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE TO REZONE 0.369 ACRES FROM R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO C-1, OFFICE DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE OPERATION OF A BEAUTY SALON LOCATED AT 3722 COLONIAL AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.18-3-31), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD AND JUDY WAGNER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 22,2007; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.369 acres located at 3722 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.18-3-31) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Richard and Judy Wagner. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The subject property shall be developed in accord with the site plan dated January 10, 2006, and revised March 14,2007. (2) The carport will be enclosed and no other expansion will be made. (3) Colonial Avenue will not be used for ingress and egress to the property. (4) A qualified engineer will design a stormwater management system and construction of such will be strictly adhered to. (5) The building will be used only as a beauty salon for the purpose of cosmetology (the cosmetic treatment of skin, hair and nails.) (6) The building will be occupied by a maximum of 5 licensed cosmetologists providing personal services to their clients. (7) The salon will be open from 9:30 am until 8:30 pm Monday through Saturday. (8) Any outdoor lighting will be installed in accord with the Colonial Avenue Development Plan so as not to be offensive to neighbors. (9) There will be no offsite parking on Green Valley Drive. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 0.369 acre parcel of real estate located at 3722 Colonial Avenue and further described as Tax Map No. 77.18-3-31 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 0-3 PETITIONER: Jatin Patel CASE NUMBER: 6-5/2007 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 1, 2007 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 22, 2007 BOS 1st Reading 4/24/07 A. REQUEST The petition of Jatin Patel to rezone 0.844 acre from C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to C-2, General Commercial District, to remove proffered conditions from property located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Philip Thompson presented the staff report. Mr. Sean Horne, Balzer & Associates, represented the applicant on this petition. Mr. Horne stated that the applicant wanted to remove the proffered conditions associated with a motor vehicle service center from a previous rezoning. Removal of the proffered conditions would allow the property to be developed under the by-right uses for the C-2, General Commercial, zoning district. D. CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Azar made a motion to favorably recommend rezoning the property and removing the proffered conditions from the property. Motion passed 3-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Petitioner: Jatin Patel Request: Rezone 0.844 acre from C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to C-2, General Commercial District, to remove proffered conditions Location: Near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, south of the intersection of Plantation Road and Interstate 81 Magisterial District: Hollins Proffered Conditions: None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request by Mr. Jatin Patel to rezone a 0.844 acre parcel to remove the existing proffered conditions. The proposed rezoning request conforms to the policies and guidelines of the Core future land use designation, which encourages high density urban development and may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core designation areas are appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. Core future land use areas are suitable for planned shopping centers, clustered retail uses are encouraged and where commercial uses have been developed. This petition conforms to the Roanoke County Community Plan and the site has ample space to conform to all applicable development standards. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The purpose of the C-2, General Commercial district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. General Commercial Districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are qenerallv consistent with the recommendations set forth in the Transition and Core land use cateqories of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Backqround - The subject property was rezoned in December of 1988 to construct a motor vehicle service center. The 1988 rezoning request was approved with several conditions, some of which are now addressed in the current site plan review process. Generally, the existing conditions would limit the development and use of the site to the motor vehicle service center shown on the concept plan dated November 7,1988. The existing conditions would require more stringent screening and buffering than is 1 presently required under the current zoning ordinance standards. At the time of the 1988 rezoning, the adjoining properties were residentially zoned and required buffer yard areas. Finally, the existing conditions limit the amount of allowable signage. Mr. Patel originally submitted a concept plan for the construction of a hotel on the subject parcel and the adjoining parcel to the east; however he is now requesting a rezoning to amend the conditions to match the zoning of the surrounding parcels. Therefore, the petitioner is requesting to rezone the property to C-2, General Commercial district and remove the existing conditions which will enable the petitioner to develop the property per the C-2, General Commercial district for the current by right uses. The existing proffered conditions are as follows: 1. Site will be developed in substantial conformity with concept plan. 2. Facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, or repairing or overhauling of trucks exceeding 10,000 Ibs. gross weight. 3. There will be no overnight outside parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 4. Petitioner will install and maintain Type D screening as recommended by County staff. 5. Petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with recommendations and approval of County staff. 6. Total signage will not exceed 180 sq. ft. No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property. TopoqraphvNeqetation - The western two thirds of the site adjacent to Plantation Road is a level grassy area surrounded by scrub vegetation and generally on the same elevation with the road. The eastern third of the site consists of a steep slope with numerous scrub trees and vegetative growth, dropping sharply (approximately 25 feet) to a watercourse/stream adjacent to the eastern property line. Surroundinq Neighborhood - The surrounding adjoining properties to the north, east and south are zoned C-2, General Commercial. Plantation Road runs the length of the property to the west. The parcels across Plantation Road are zoned C-2, General Commercial'and C-2C, General Commercial with conditions. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - The site is currently vacant. AccessfTraffic Circulation - Initially, a concept plan and Traffic Impact Analysis study was submitted to construct a hotel on this site. However, the petitioners do not want to proffer a hotel use and are requesting an unconditional zoning to match the zoning of the rear adjoining property. VDOT anticipates the typical traffic increase for development of the site. VDOT and the County Transportation Engineering Division commented that the potential for future interchange improvements at this location could involve a shift in the current alignment of Plantation Road per the Interstate 81 Improvement Study dated November 1998. The County Transportation Engineering Division also noted that if a more traffic intensive land use is chosen for this site, a revised Traffic Impact Analysis and site plan should be submitted for review during the site plan approval stage. This information is subject to revision during the site plan review process. 2 Economic Development - There are no objections to the proposed rezoning. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Per the Fire Department review, 2 additional Fire Inspections will be performed per year. Fire flow requirement information will be based on the use of the proposed building. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The proposed rezoning request conforms to the policies and guidelines of the Core future land use designation, which encourages high density urban development and may parallel the central business districts of Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. Core designation areas are appropriate for larger-scale highway-oriented retail uses and regionally based shopping facilities. Core future land use areas are suitable for planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses are encouraged and where commercial uses have been developed. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request to obtain rezoning of this property from C-2C, General Commercial District with conditions to C-2, General Commercial District. This petition conforms to the Roanoke County Community Plan. The site has ample space to conform to all applicable development standards. Upon submission of site plans to the County for review, additional comments will be given. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: 6-5/2007 Tammi l. Wood PC: 5/1/07 Application Site Requirement Snapshot Aerial Map land Use/Zoning Map C2, General Commercial District Standards Old Ordinance Copies BOS: 5/22/07 3 ..l:::)2 r 01 C() LQ-/) C> County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning For Staff Use Onl Date received: ?Ji/~/q Received by: ().- 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Application fee: , ., 'if; -1 . ';: Placards issued: Case Number I ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ji(Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address wlzip :rATlN 'P4TG1. el18 PI.. """'" 1"A "nO,.... i2 0 \2.cAN-Cl I'E' V'4- z.,&t 0 I ~ Phone: Work: Cell #: Fax No,: S~. '6{gG,. -03tj-1 6" 40 '3 "". 1.~ ~5'" Owner's name/address whip ....... ~ eT l'" '-'5 WI'-!..' W'.V\o1 C <;' t..:l"" LU' I",L 140~ i.6a.U6rH S -..M I c...I..- ~ 0 F'ic-lo'-"'< S Tl.-t: / \/ fA. zqd1 0 Property Location K-'"\N.T'A-nOI'-l '~A 0 Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: Magisterial District: Community Planning area: Tax Map No,: o . ,e - 0 G ~ 01. . 00 Size ofparcel(s): Acres: O. e~ Lf Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.1-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RJSIW/CP) Proposed Zoning: C. ... "2. Proposed Land Use: l-b-reL- on.. o~~ MI:'I2.C.l>4c.. ~,(",...-r Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested dislrict? Y es ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No 51 VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (V/WIAA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) oftbe Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal oflnterpretation ofSection(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RfSIWICP V/AA RfSIWICP V/AA R/SfW/CP V/AA ~ consultation~' 81/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee ./ Application v Metes and bounds description"~ Proffers, if applicable v Justification ~ Water and sewer application V' Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the r's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 ".,.'.'..,- '.:'-",--"--"--:':'" .,.: '." --'..:,...., .'. ';.-.::'..""..':':.'.:-"" , '" '" .. . , . . -. .. . . -- '. ". '" . . , .' " .:: .'-' .. , '.. . ., - '. ,'" ,~ ' . -'.', . " ".' JUSTlFICA nON FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (lS.i-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning ofthe applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. ~ ..A \ ~rv"<:L t+c'J) Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan, s.~- \Clor~l-t"b~ Please describe the impact(s) ofthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation and fire and rescue. s~ \A..~'-tc:v) 3 I JUSTIFICATION FOR V ARIANCi REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted, Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. rJ/1A 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property. NrA 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. NIA 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. ~/A 4 ., " ."..". JUSTIFICA TION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: ~qt} 2. Evidence supporting claim: ~1 A 5 I CONCEPTPL~ tH~C}(LI~t A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pennitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit. Site plan and building pennit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: V d. v' e. V f. V g. V h. vi 1. -Yj, ALL APPLICANTS V a. Applicant name and name of development V b. Date, scale and north arrow \/ c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc, The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS ~ k, Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site ./ I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers ../ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals V n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections V o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants ~ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed V q. lfproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. s;gn"m~ ~3 ~'S;07 Date 6 Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the plarming staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective Date: April 19,2005 ?~TE'\- ~3~ ,5-07 Date Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reselVe the right to request a traffic study at any time/ as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: . Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units . Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) . Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash . Retail shop/Shopping center . Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) . Regional public facilities . Ed ucationa 1/ Recreationa I faci I ities . Religious assemblies . Hotel/Motel . Golf course . Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic . Industrial site/Factory . Day care center . Bank . Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) . For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly · When required to evaluate access issues · Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) · Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem · Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) · Substantial departure from the Community Plan · Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Statement of Justification Rezoning of Parcel 018.18-02-03.00 Existing Zoning C2-C (52-12-1988) Proposed Zoning C2 The purpose of this rezoning request is to remove the proffered conditions associated with rezoning case (52-12-1988). In 1988 the property was rezoned from B-2 to B-3 to allow for a vehicle service station. As part of this rezoning the following conditions were proffered: 1) Site will be developed in \substantial conformance with the concept plan. 2) Facility will not be used for repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body or fender work or repairing or overhauling trucks exceeding 10,000 Ibs gross weight. 3) There will be no overnight outside parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 4) Petitioner will install Type D Screening as recommended by County staff. 5) Petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with recommendations and approval of County staff. 6) Total signage will not exceed 180 sf. No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property. The zoning of this property has since been re-designated as C-2c and the underlying C-2 designation allows by-right the requested use as a vehicle service station. The petitioner is requesting that the proffers be removed from the property so it can be developed in accordance with the C-2 by right uses listed in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The subject parcel is adjoined on all sides by other C-2 properties that have no restrictions or proffers associated with them. This request furthers the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance by providing a site in an appropriate highly commercial area that could offer a variety of commercial and/or service related needs. The site is located on a major arterial thoroughfare and can serve large segments of the county. This project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained with the Roanoke County Community Plan by encouraging commercial growth in appropriate locations. In this case the removal of the conditions will allow for appropriate commercial development that will not only provide tax advantages but will also provide support services to the large scale industrial and commercial developments in the immediate area. No negative impacts to the county infrastructure are anticipated with this development. All improvements will be made in accordance with Roanoke County, Western Va Water Authority and VDOT standards. Legal Description Parcel # 018.18-02-03.00 'BEGINNING ~t a point ~lOx:g. the':;ea'$;1;~-~:l;y;",",r,~9'~t:-of -way line of :Plant~tlon Road (Vlrglnla ROU,~~:,,:~.~?),:~~~p.a:'-!~,r:g a c<?mmon corner wlth the southwest corner of ~cDO~~i1s Corporatlon Property, as recorded in Deed Book 1292, Page.J.fS4 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of RoanokelCounty, and said corner being 409.9B feet south of the southeast intersections of plantation Road with Interstate I~81~ thence leaving Plantation Road and with McDonalds Corporation in a northeasterly direction, N 650 00' 10" E, 185.34 feet to a point and said point being along the westerly side of New Parcel "C" (1.141 ac.), property of Willilam C. Hale and Eunice G. Hale and Robert O. Hale and Pauline A. Hale; thence S 200 34' 15" E, 187.49 feet to a point and said point being along the northerly side of property of Carl Slate and Carol A. Hughes Slate; thence with Slate in a southwepterly direction, S 650 00' 10" W, 201.48 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Plantation Road~ thence with Plantation Road in a northerly direction, N 180 28' 00" W, 137.47 feet to a point; thence N 8Q 261 24" W, 52.33 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.844 acres, as more particularly shown on plat as recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of RoanOKe County in Deed Book 1242, Page 1518. REFLECTING TOMORROW Adioinine Property Owners: TM#: 18.18-02-01.00 McDonalds Corporation 8115 Plantation Road 1.22 AC Zoning: C2C Billing Address: MKG Enterprise Attn: Michael Grimm 2965 Colonnade Drive Suite 310 Roanoke, VA 24018 TM#: 18.18-01-08.00 SVS Hospitality Inc. 8110 Plantation Road 0.85 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Venkat Reddy President 8040 Plantation Road Roanoke, VA 24019 TM#: 18.18-02-04.00 Slate Carl & Carol Ann Hughes 7538 Friendship Lane 3.54 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Slate Carl & Carol Ann Hughes 7538 Friendship Lane Hollins, VA 24019 Balzer & Associates Inc. TM#: 18.18-02-02.00 Smith Alice K 7670 Keaton Drive 0.60 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address.- Smith Alice K 855 KenBridge Road Blackston, VA 23824 TM#: 18.18-02-03.01 Hale William C & Eunice G Et Als o Keaton Drive 1.14 AC Zoning: C2 Billing Address: Hale William C & Eunice GEt Als 1408 Brughs Mill Road Fincastle, VA 24090 Balzer & Associates Inc. Site Requirement Snapshot Current Site Zoning: C2C Proposed Site Zoning: C2 Proposed Use: By Right Uses - see C2 General Commercial Zoning attachment BuildinQ HeiQht Required: BuildinQ HeiQht Proposed: In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise specified in the ordinance None proposed Total number of parkinQ spaces required: Total number of parkinQ spaces proposed: Required number of handicap parkinQ spaces: Actual number of handicap parkinQ spaces: None proposed None proposed None proposed None proposed Required Stacking spaces: Proposed Stackinq spaces: None proposed None proposed Required Buffer Type: No buffer required. all adjacent properties are zoned C2. Required Crown Coverage %: Proposed Crown Coverage: 35% None proposed 4 .-.... u o l - -- c ,Q ~ QJ <fl C 0 ,~ QJ 0 c ~ ~ "0 tii ,Q QJ QJ C 0 J ro <fl OJ c QJ 0 "0 ~ ~ QJ E .c > 0 0 c E OJ (l :> a. :2 <fl QJ 0 .0 rn c rn rn OJ Qj .c 'u; a. 0 !:i !:i g > OJ c QJ '(3 0 ~ ~ :> QJ 'w ~ 0 c III D z I- 0 & III ~ f l . ro: r I p , I i ., - .. .I " .r .' .. I Z ;.;" :l"' .j ~. ..~.J 1 " 1)'1 I. I' " .. SEC. 30-54. C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-54-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. General Commercial Districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the Transition and Core land use categories of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi-Family Dwelling * Two-Family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Family Day Care Home * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Automobile Dealership, New * 5 Automobile Repair Services, Minor * Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail * Bed and Breakfast * Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services * Consumer Repair Services Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station * Hospital Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial * Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, General Restaurant, Family Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower · Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major * 2. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership, Used * Automobile Repair Services, Major * Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Convenience Store * Dance Hall 6 Equipment Sales and Rental -I: Manufactured Home Sales -I: Mini-warehouse -I: Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service -I: Restaurant, Drive-in and Fast Food -I: Surplus Sales Truck Stop -I: 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing -I: Landfill, Rubble -I: Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, ~ 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, ~ 1,2-27-96; 042297-14, ~ 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No. 042799-11, ~ 2, 4-27-99; Ord. NO.1 02803-15, S 2, 10-28-03) Sec. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (0) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, ~ 10,6-22-93) 7 / ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ r, ,) '\ 1.. ~ :::, ~ '-.!. 10 z:-6 Page 1 of 2 C:i 9 . ij'-~~(~-~~=:J) ?~{\S'\6117&'!9? (~,,=-- AQ;'~ 41-- '%-" BEFORE THE BJARD OF CDUNI'Y SUPERVISrnS OF ROANOKE ~~Etg~i;JiD'~t 1'0 DEPT. OF DEV. '_F} \",,- ROArWKE COUNTY :,?~J \\~r:;> _ .:'i'! "p -. c'L'ti:;' ".<~ CL'rc-f.'t,')Y '.:.....t1B:~ 1<' , I " VIRGINIA: /1'1 RE: ;)~ZON/NG 01=" ,,(()SrY Ac!~eS o,c ,&~N.o oS IT4'/'1TC: /"<r'ING:- /'IN;D ,8~/I'/G- /N T/lE ilo.L LI",,/sM;4tF/ST6/f'/F)A. 'o/5TI'YICT /1;/9/Jot<c at:oJT~ ./ ' .- .FA""/l'1 ~!"-;A/c.sS J)15r/{'ICT j3.,z ) 10 3#S/NE..s:s ;::J,.sr/JICT B~ ) FINAL ORDER WHEREAS, your peti tionezsr ~p &5?Ail Am 5 , did peti tion the Board of County, Supervisors to rezone a tract of land located in the I/-,LL/A/5 Magisterial District and containing~c?5d'" acres(s), rrore or less, from &19.0,-.:: 5S Di str iet ~ to "'E, / A/ /0,",,> '<; District 13-3 in order to r.'rJ/JP/J/Y/"fJ 77-/r=: ::;;;ON//IJc;;. t':l.LA-SS/ r/t!/7T/()# To T#~ L.oNG .r.:X/,57/NC-; ~/.''5~' r1~ 5A/D ./~05??' fieRI:. PA',;f'eE.G WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Carrnission did hold a p.1blic hearing on said rffJUest on JUiJ <;I /7. 1'?)J{'4 at which tire, , all parties in interest ~e given an OIJfOrtuni ty to I:e heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration of said rffJUest, the planning Carmission did recomTend to the Board of Coonty Supervisors that the request I:e A/,'p~oYci) ; and WliEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of Ccunty Supervisors did hold a I;Ublic hearing on said request on Atlr;:jI<lT /-1-" /i7J~ at. the Roanoke Coonty Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Rcanoke, Virginia, at which tirre all parties in interest were given an cppxtuni ty to I:e heard; and WHEREAS, after full oonsideration, the Board of Camty Supervisors is of the opinion that the request sh~ld l:e &RA.rJTcI) ," Page 2 of 2 NOW, 'lliEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from .8-z to 13-::5 . BEGINNING at an i~on pin at the inte~geotion of the east lino of Plantation Road and the south line of Interstate Route ~all thence with the SOLt~ line of Inte~9tato Route .al, S. 88" 12' 40" E. 195.0C feet to an i~on pin, thonce leaving Route 191, and with a new division line, S. 2' 22' 39" E. 205.33 feet to an iron pin in tho north lino of the propo~ty of a.w.c. Limitedl thence with said line, S. 65' 00' 10. w. 190.0~ feet to an iron pipe in the ea~t line of Plan- tation R04dr thence with tho ea5t line uf Plantation ~ad along a chor~ N. 3" 54' 17" ~. 85.39 teet to an iron pinl thence ' along a chord N. 11' 12' ~O. H. 13.58 feet to an iron pin! th~nce Rlon~ a chord N. 10' 31' 35" w. 21.03 feot to an iron pinl thenco along a chord N. 10. 00' W. 3.27 feet to an iron pinr thenco along a ch~~d N. 6. 11' 40. W. 170.11 feet to the rlaee of B~GIN~I3u, and containing 1.058 acra., and being as more pa~ticularly sh~~ on plat mado by Jack G. Be9s, Certified Lend Surveyor, datcd Soptember 28, 197', a ,");:>y of which 1:1 attnched ho~oto and rocordad hertNitll/ and BEING a part of tho sama property convoyed to 8143 Cor- por3t1on from I!enry L. Keaton, widO\'or. by deod datod Dece~ber 18, 1975, of record in tho Clork's Offico of the Circuit Court for tho County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deod Book 1051, p.ago 961 and TOGETHI!:R NITlI A t\lenty-foot wide sanit.uy se\o'tlr aUlllllGnt running from the north04stern cornn~ of tho proporty horein conveyed in an eA~tcrly di ,'ection across tho north~rn portion of that 0.602 ,,'ro p3:-ccl of land being rotr.ined by 8143 Corporati~, as mora particularly sh~n on th~ plat 3tt3ched hereto, .~id ea.e~ont boinq grantod for the purposo of ~aintaining, repairing, and r~?lacing the exi~~ing 5eWer line located thoreon as ~11 85 for tho future 1n9t411~tion and maintenance o~ any a~ditional ~o~cr line~ a' ~~y be roquired by H. L. Ent.~- prbc" Inc. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be tran~nitted to {"the County planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that .f~ tJ change on the official zoning maps of the County. ~1.'11 ADJPTED on motion of Supervisor Burton and upon the ~~1 following recorded vote: --:I~ _ '1 AYl::S: Burton, McGraw, Nickens .=m NAYS: None ~J:;+~ ~~~ ABS!::I'lT: Bri t tIe, Minter __ {;:"'_~, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors L;Cj 8/]7/84 Copies County Attorney County Assessor Engineering Department of Development Planning Bruce Mayer, P. O. Box 459, Vinton, Virginia tJ (J) VIRGINIA: BEEDRE THE BOMD OF SUPERVISORS OF Rc:.\l\OOKE CDUNI"f /~gz-5 A . BLtLt acre parcel of land, generally located 8L 13 Plantar; on Road within the Hollins Magisterial District, and PROFFER OF CONDITIONS co co '-." m '-." N ...; recorded as parcel t 18. 18-2-} in the Roanoke County Tax Rea:>rds. 'ID THE HO~ SUPERVISORS OF RrnIDKE c:oum.Y: E-< z W E-< z o u o E-< [() ~ Cl W > o 0::; 0.. 0.. .:c Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the COde of Virginia and Sec. 21-105B of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the petitioner Robert Hale hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the arove-referenced parcel of land: 1. Site will be developed in substantial conformity w:j,th concept plan. 2. Facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuildine, reconditioning, body and fender work, Dr repairing or overhauling of trucks exceeding 10,000 Ibs. gross weight. 3. There will be no overnight outside parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. Lt. Petitioner will install and maintain Type D screening as recommended by County staff. 5. Petitioner will install outside lighting in' accordance with recommendations and approval of County staff. 6. Total signage will not exceed 180 sq. ft. No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property. ~~. Peti tl ner . - 9 - $t- --- .. = 10 , :: ~ " . ~ ~ \ ~Ii 1 _ ~ i ~. I l l >, ~ ~~ '~ ,~ ~.~~i .... :::.o~ 'f \~ -:~ I,;: in~ ~ ,.<> .. " ,- " c >~~ ~" -., "0 itt:: --- ,.~ I 51 I 1 11 j j} ~\I ~i{'~'~ ~ ~ , "',: J I ~ ------+ ~ ;;; = a >- W rr ,a o tJ > .... -< 0 ., 0: 0,,- - '" .. . (I] t- -< w r W tJ o rr -< iij 0( a.. r <II .... o Z 0 Z w Z o ~ ~ ~>< ~ ~ D.. ;,: a W w '" 0: ~ tJ -< N8 ~ ~ N a: CD < ~ 0 ~ => 2; ~ ~ ffi Z -< Il. :l "- 0 cj' -< '" o ~ '" ctJ Z o i= -<( -.I :::) lD -<( ..... ~ ';' a '" III 0 I 0 ~ ~ tlI d .... N .... CI Z I I "It Z Z < (Q ~ z 0 LU G ION ~ -< N a a.. U.l t- ~ g < a: ffi,o ~ .( CQ a.. ~ w w 0.5 ~ t: ~ g: m. .... "' rr :< "- OJ rr OJ w~ "'>- =>0 ::l; a 0 w.... en => 0-< 0. o rr 0. LU, !::: ctJ \ o , :1. ~ ~.~ ~- ~~!~ c~ ~ c~ .. ~~<> '" ~ ~~ i ~ ~ -~ "0 ~ <> , r- "'I fl'tJ '~1'1 ffW !lJ1ovr~ .., iJr1't -lJr1t flHI}17H #~ ~,yl..0w~ l.--~ (;i~Ol '....lll.OO.~t - \ t ----~--:~ - Jd .n. )f/,fJ , .~-. - /. ":;IIOZ 1i'~ u ""0 "J 2hZI ~ HOIOJ It (j1!fNO(j~W NiJlJlltJ::'1fJJl1!JdDlfd ("") I (:q C) E- N I (:q -< z a ~~~. a ~~i 5 0...1-0 l!C ~~~ -~ LijA-~ m ~ ~E~ ~ ..... ~ aJ 0:: It ~ '" Z 0 ~ w il; z. C) N I ~ 0:: w z, :; OJ . W .,' o >-. -< -< ::; III W ~. ~ ",' rr rr w ;::: '" ~ ~. .... ::l; w " rr Z >= 0 '" .... >( - w :5 8 In :;l ~ .... '" 0 ffi ~ ~ ~ Cl. cD 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ff a.. " ;<0~~ ~ ... LU ..... :::) 0 a: I ...: J i 2: 0 -<( 0 ~I a: z I 0 i= "" t- ~ Z <( ..J Co - ....1 jo._--~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ u .. ~ "i! ~o~ ;~~ c ~ ~ ...~~ is''-' 'il~i ;lIlz.., u 0 ~ :g ~ !i ::ii1 . :i! ~ ~ 0, z ;;: -< o. u z ., a a -' ~: ~ ~ ... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE TO REZONE 0.844 ACRES FROM C-2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO REMOVE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE 8000 BLOCK OF PLANTATION ROAD (TAX MAP NO.18.18-2-3), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE APPLICATION OF JATIN PATEL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 22, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.844 acres, as described herein, and located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road, south of the intersection of Plantation Road and Interstate 81 (Tax Map Number 18.18-2-3) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jatin Patel. 3. That this property was rezoned in December of 1988 to construct a motor vehicle service center with the following conditions which the Petitioner has requested be 1 REMOVED: (1) Site will be developed in substantial conformity with concept plan. (2) Facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, or repairing or overhauling of trucks exceeding 10,000 Ibs. gross weight. (3) There will be no overnight outside parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. (4) Petitioner will install and maintain Type D screening as recommended by County staff. (5) Petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with recommendations and approval of County staff. (6) Total signage will not exceed 180 sq. ft. No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 0.844 acre parcel located near the 8000 block of Plantation Road and south of the Intersection of Plantation Road and Interstate 81 and further described as Tax Map No. 18.18-2-3. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 0-tf PETITIONER: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC CASE NUMBER: 7-5/2007 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 1, 2007 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 22, 2007 BOS 1 st Reading 4/24/07 A. REQUEST The petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC, to rezone 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology Development, and to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology Development, at the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology, located near the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS One citizen spoke requesting that the Planning Commission delay taking action on this request until the citizens along Prunty Drive had more information. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Philip Thompson presented the staff report. Mr. Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development, presented the applicant's report. Mr. Rodney McNeil asked about the changes from the original application to this request. Mr. Chittum reviewed the changes to the Master Plan and the covenants/guidelines. Mr. Chittum also stated that he would be willing to meet with the Prunty Drive residents and provide them with any information regarding the project. D. CONDITIONS Per Section 30-63-6(C) of the Zoning Ordinance, the written and graphic information submitted by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of the Zoning Ordinance. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. McNeil made a motion to favorably recommend rezoning 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology Development, and to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology Development, at the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. Motion passed 3-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Petitioner: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., and Tecton Products, LLC Request: Rezone approximately 25.3 from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology Development, and amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD Location: 5800 block of Prunty Drive, 5300 block of Glenmary Drive) Center for Research and Technology Magisterial District: Catawba Proffered Conditions: Per Section 30-63-6(C), the written and graphic information submitted by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of the Zoning Ordinance EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request is to rezone approximately 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology Development, and to amend the covenants, conditions and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD. The new covenants, conditions and Master Plan would guide development at the Center for Research and Technology (CRT). The new covenants, conditions, and Master Plan were developed WIth input from County staff, the Design Review Team (DRT) for CRT, the community, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors. The Community Plan land use designation for the five properties involved in the request is Principal Industrial. These areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. This request is consistent with the future land use designation and the goals, objectives and implementation strategies listed in the Economic Development Plan component of the Community Plan. 1, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-63 of the Zoning Ordinance provides the district regulations for properties zoned PTO (Planned Technology Development). Section 30-63 also outlines the application process to rezone properties to PTD, the information required for the application, and the process for revising a final master plan once adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Development of individual industrial sites would be reviewed by the Design Review Team for CRT and would also follow the County's subdivision and site plan review processes. 2, ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Backqround In 1999, the County rezoned approximately 457 acres of property along Glenmary Drive from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to PTO (Planned Technology District) to establish the Center for Research and Technology (CRT). As part of the rezoning process a Master Plan and design guidelines/protective covenants were developed and became proffers associated with the development in accordance with Section 30-63-6(C) of the Zoning Ordinance. A review of the project's Master Plan and design guidelines/protective covenants was established as part of the project. After the property was rezoned, the County began constructing the infrastructure (roads and utilities) to attract new businesses. Two businesses (Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton Products, LLC) have located in CRT. The County's Economic Development Authority has also purchased an adjacent piece of property approximately 25.3 acres in size. In 2006, the County's Department of Economic Development hired Hill Studio to review and update CRT's Master Plan and design guidelines/protective covenants. Hill Studio, working with Economic Development staff and Community Development staff, developed a revised Master Plan and design guidelines/protective covenants. The Design Review Team for CRT was involved in the process and has endorsed the revised Master Plan and guidelines. A community meeting on the revised Master Plan and guidelines was held on January 25,2007, at the Spring Hollow Water Treatment Building and a worksession with the Planning Commission was held on February 20, 2007. T opoqraphyNeqetation The site has a wide range of slope and topography. The southern portion of the site is the most level. The northern portion of the site becomes quite steep, with slopes exceeding 25% for the majority of this portion of the property. The majority of the site contains woodlands consisting of oak, hickory, beech, ash, tulip poplar, maple and scattered evergreen. Surroundinq Neiqhborhood The site is bordered on the west by the Prunty and Dow Hollow communities and on the east by the Glenvar Heights neighborhood. These established single-family residential areas are zoned R-1, Low Density Residential. Interstate 81 borders the property to the south. Across 1-81, properties are zoned R-1 and C-2, General Commercial. Properties to the north are zoned AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Master Plan The revised master plan covers five properties totaling approximately 479.55 acres. This revised master plan was developed to identify sites that could accommodate 75,000 square foot buildings which could be expanded to 150,000 square feet. Six parcels have been illustrated on the master plan along with the circulation system and existing buildings. These parcels can be subdivided into smaller parcels based on a company's needs. The parcels range in size from 23 acres to 161 acres with building envelopes from 4 acres to 18 acres. A recreational area is also proposed around the existing pond and a new storm water management lake. A 100-foot buffer is shown along the north, south and west property lines, and a 300- foot buffer along the eastem property line abutting Glenvar Heights. Development along these buffer areas shall minimize impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation and hours of operation. Development Guidelines/Protective Covenants A revised set of development guidelines/protective covenants were developed as part of this project. The guidelines/covenants that were part of the rezoning in 1999 were confusing and difficult to utilize. The revised guidelines generally keep to the spirit and intent of the original guidelines. The guidelines are divided into three articles. Article I includes the purpose, definitions, and permitted uses in CRT. Article II 2 discusses the Design Review Team's appointment and procedures, the project review process and procedures, and enforcement. Article III lists the development and design standards for CRT. These standards address site development, buildings (location, height, and design), parking and loading areas, utilities, waste, lighting, accessory structures, landscaping, signs, transportation elements, temporary construction structures and utilities, and design and maintenance of common public areas. Palettes dealing with lighting, landscaping, and signage have also been incorporated into this section of the guidelines to provide graphic examples of the existing development at CRT and what future development should emulate in site development and design. AccessfT rafflc Circu lation The primary access to CRT is Glenmary Drive. A variety of internal access roads are shown on the master plan to provide access throughout the park. A potential secondary access from the Dow Hollow corridor was shown on the original master plan from 1999, and the Board of Supervisors consequently adopted a centerline for this proposed roadway. The revised master plan shows an alternative location for the last portion of this secondary access. Future detailed engineering will determine the exact location of this potential roadway. A draft Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by HSMM was submitted with this application. HSMM examined the projected increase in traffic volumes associated with the proposed buildout of CRT and identified geometric improvements which may be required as well as completed capacity analyses for the design year 2022 buildout conditions. HSMM concluded that based on VDOT's Road Design Manual, a left and right turn lane may be required for the northbound approach to the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. HSMM also concluded that this improvement would be very difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT I1mited access line (for Interstate 81). VDOT and County Transportation staff have provided HSMM comments on this draft TIA and are awaiting a final TIA from HSMM. Fire & Rescue/Utilities Public utilities are available and there will not be a significant impact on fire and rescue services. Economic Development The Roanoke County Economic Development Department supports this request. Community Meetinq A community meeting on the revised Master Plan and guidelines was held on January 25,2007, at the Spring Hollow Water Treatment Building. Economic Development staff explained the review process as well as the revised development guidelines and Master Plan. Citizens had comments regarding the possible construction of a new road from Dow Hollow Road into the park, the number of developable acres of the site, the uses for lot 5 (the nearest lot to Glenvar Heights), the hours of operation for future businesses, and the design guidelines. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The properties associated with this request are designated Principal Industrial on the future land use map in the 2005 Community Plan. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. This project is consistent with the future land use designation. Development of the Center for Research & Technology is also compatible with the goals, objectives and implementation strategies listed in the Economic Development Plan component of the Community Plan. 3 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This request is to rezone approximately 25.3 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to PTD, Planned Technology Development, and to amend the covenants, conditions and Master Plan on 454.25 acres zoned PTD. The new covenants, conditions, and Master Plan were developed with input from County staff, the Design Review Team (DRT) for CRT, the community, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors. This request is consistent with the Principal Industrial future land use designation and the goals, objectives and implementation strategies in the Economic Development Plan component of the Community Plan. Staff supports rezoning of the 25.3 acre property and amending the guidelines/covenants, conditions, and Master Plan. DATE: April 27, 2007 CASE NUMBER: 7-5/2007 HEARING DATES: May 1,2007 May 22,2007 PREPARED BY: P. Thompson ATTACHMENTS: Application Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants Zoning Map Land Use Map Draft Traffic Impact Analysis dated February 20, 2007 Board of Supervisors Resolution 031307-2 Vegetation & Hydrology Map Steep Topography Map CRT Master Plan 4 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive POBox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS For Staff Use Onl Dale received: 3 Received by: App/icatiorl fee: Placards issued: Case Number 'g '- 5' Check type ofapplication filed (check all that apply) . Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address whip Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al (see attached sheet) PO Box 29800 / 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Owner's name/address whip Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al (see attached sheet) PO Box 29800 / 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Property Location - Properties are located at the end of Glenmary Drive (north of 1-81), along Corporate Circle, and at the end of Putney Drive Phone: (540) 772-2005 Work: CeIl #: Fax No.: (540) 772-2193 Phone #: (540) 772-2005 Work: Fax No. #: (540) 772-2193 Magisterial District: Catawba Tax Map No.: Various Parcels - see attached sheet Community Planning area: Glenvar Existing Zoning: PTD and R-l Size of parceI(s): Acres: _479.55+/- Acres_ Existing Land Use: Research & Technology Park / Vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (RJS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: PTD with amended Master Plan and amended Development GuidelineslProtective COvenants Proposed Land Use: Research & Technology Park Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes 0 No 0 IF NO, A V ARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST Ifrezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No D VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL APPLICANTS (V/WIAA) VariancefWaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal ofInterpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA nON WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RfSrwlCP VIAA R/SfWlCP V/AA RlSIWICP V/AA ~ Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan ~ Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, ifapplicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner ofthe property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature ? I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance ofa building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan shou Id be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some ofthe items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS -L a. Applicant name and name of development Date, scale and north arrow Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces -L b. x c. x d. -L e. x f. -L g. -L h. -L I. -L J. Additional information requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERM/T APPLICANTS -L k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site -L I. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers -L m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals -.1L n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections -.1L o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants -.1L p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed -L q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date 6 PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT SIGNATURE FORM (1) ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~ /fvef2 Signature ~ t; 1 n'l fJ'-- }~) t{fi f _ Printed" Name \) c.vu h1rA A-J fl\.: fl i S+('(]..:m r' Title J (2) ROANOKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ~~ fJlL '-( 111544~oll Printed Name 4,11111"" ,,~ Title (3) NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS INC. ~ 19nature \ -u:L 't1-<--l tV ; IL Printed Name ~(.......;L.J- Title (4) Signatu f f~ ~ ~~J Printed Name ~6!-tH- H/t;-tJ;:~ 71!brDI.l Title ~ z. ~! ~,: ~< ~ r.d C/J ~." ~: ::E ~ " " " " :d'~<?~.}~- .~. ,>, ." ):~- ~.,._.. " '.J' ....' , '\:\ "" ~ 0 e'~:'\,' '\ "- ,\ \.. ,\ '\ .. .\ \.. ,\ \" ,\ '\ " ,\ '\\ ~ "<-\ g> ./'.,./ \~" ~;; ,'./ "-~ '. 2. ~ .' \ \'" ".,' ;j~~/ ..\. """, ': /11." .. , """, ",:/, "\.\.- . ',/'-.., . '. '\ /'Y- . \ \, -->., \~." o~o ~ ~~, too 0( oU.r .-;; , 0.. ~ " C o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C c o. . ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~~ o " Z~ all. ~ ~ ? -~O\ ~ I :C,tv'\ >- C) o ..J o Z :r: u w ~ Cl Z <t; :r: u ~ <t; W l/J W ~ ~ o l1. ~ w f-< Z w U >< f-< Z :J o U w ~ o z <t; o ~ I '~J' OJ '. . r \ /)\ ~4 Z 0- t ~ 2 S'I \2 f-o :r .~ c.:' l, '"' f' C- r"", ..... ~ L:. b ><--. P !.tJ :r< c:: >-~. Z <[ J: L p, <l: u. [f u. ~ p, C u. p, u. f- Z u. C I ,--' J ~ '11'.:-. >- f- Z ~ c G \,:.: ~ C Z <l: C ~ )', ~ I,? A ~ --- "- :~ )' <II " / .~ ~ ..0 ;]' '" /' ';1' ;, ....... .... '...................' '" ...............'...-.:. ..> ~' / / /' ~.. ~ ) n J / "V~ GI U . o ~ ~ , -t'- .~~~ :.,.. :-, -v"" ) ~ (I Z;, <<: -I -.l o' " ,. -" ~ ~n f-<~ U')~ <<: .,., :E .: /' /' .' ,/.:'<,>- /' ,&1'::; . ,p",,,,1 . . , /' /" : \.... / J /.' ,/." 0.' .,...J / .. ,~ ,\\ \\ ,\\ " '\ \\ '.\ \ " " \ \ " " \ \ " '.\ ,\\ " \ \ .. "'\ i,), ~~ .~ ,.,,_Y? ~\."""'" $'0 C'>--- ','- \, '.,.> -" - ..j~' , ,~ ..,....\ ....~.~'. : ::-/ 1"\ ,;, __~ '/. ./. sg~' ',', :' ~ \, .. _ ,_, ~: /._ / m '-:-,:: I ~ ._:\ ..........:......... ./.:.;~~~., ,00" \, "><':":::__ <00 ' .' ',So .. , --- _/ '\':,'- \:;;_/ <.::;:_-::::::;:> . o i>. ~ u C o .~ ~ ~ ~ " .:; C .~ > :; ... a t;t; - " o ~ zo; IllI-' .~ " . ....);:-0 -:~ I;~ >-< l? o .....:i o Z 1: u ~ E-< o z -< 1: u ~ -< ~ VJ ~ P::: ~ o I.-t. ~ ~ [-< Z ~ U >-< [-< Z :J o U ~ ~ o z -< o P::: DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH &: TECHNOLOGY DRAFT 3-09.07 ARTICLE 1- GENERAL DECLARATIONS AND PERMITTED USES A. Purpose The purpose of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants are to ensure that the property designated as the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology will be developed and maintained in an attractive, park-like campus setting for science and technology businesses, research and development businesses, corporate offices and environmentally appropriate manufacturing uses as approved under the terms and conditions set forth in tills document and in accordance with the approved zoning of the property. B. Definitions 1. Design Review Team: The development review body appointed by the Connty Administrator :in acmrdana:> with these Development Standards and Protective Covenants to assist the County :in reviewing development proposals for the Center. 2. County Administrator: The Administrator of Roanoke County or his designee. 3. Business or Businesses: The owner(s), Iessee(s), or occupant(s), including prospective owners, lessees or occupants of the Property. 4. Center: Roanoke Cmmty Center for Research & Technology :in the County of Roanoke, Virginia 5. Improvements: Any and all improvements made to or constructed upon the Property :including, but not limited to roads, buildings, structures, tanks and storage containers, drainage and utility facilities, driveway and parking areas, grading, landscaping, fencing, screening devices, site lighting, communication devices, signs, and all similar or related structures or improvements. I 6. Center Master Plan: 7. Corrununity: 8. Property or Properties: 9. Restrictions: 10. Park: 11. Setback: 12. Transfer: The general development plan and a land use plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, including infrastructure, road and parcel design as approved by the fuard of Supervisors of Roanoke County. The Glenvar Community Planning Area as defined by the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. The parcel or parcels of land, including any :improvements thereon, located in the Center, as set forth in any deed, option, lease, agreement, or agreement of sale applicable to these restrictions. The covenants, design guidelines, conditions and restrictions contained in tills document Roanoke County Center for Research & Teclmology located in Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with the Center Master Plan dated 3-09-07, prepared by Hill ShIdio, and adopted by the County of Roanoke on The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from a street right~f-way or lot line. Any conveyance or transfer of title or possessory rights respecting the Property, any portion thereof, or any interest therein,. by contract, deed exchange, foreclosure (including a deed in lieu thereof), assi~ent, lease, operation of law, or other means, to another person or persons or entity or entities, whether voluntary or involuntmy. In the case of a non-publicly held corporation, the assi~ent or other transfer of fifty percent (50%) or more of its capital stock evidencing control of such corporation shall constihIte a Transfer, unless made to the corporations parent or subsidiary controlled (through stock ownership) by the corporation In the case of a partnership, general or limited, a change of the general partner or the transfer or assi~ent of partnership interests in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the partnership interests shall constihIte a Transfer. In the case of a limited liability company, the transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of its membership interests shall constihIte a Transfer. The granting of a mortgage, deed of trust, lien or other encumbrance on or with respect to the Property shall not be deemed a Transfer, but any foreclosure there under (or deed in lieu thereof) shall constihIte a Transfer. 2 C. Applicability These Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, including the land use regulations and building requirements, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in and to the real property or any portion thereof, and shall be incorporated in any Transfer of the Property as covenants running with the Property. The County Administrator shall record applicable documents and revisions associated with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants with the Roanoke County Oerk of the Circuit Court Invalidation of any of the provisions of these guidelines and covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions, or parts thereof, which shall remain in full force and effect. D. Land Uses and Development Standards 1. Uses Permitted The Center shall be developed exclusively as established in the Center Master Plan for uses designated and incorporated herein. All properties shall be developed in accordance with the design ~delines and requirements set forth in these Covenants and Development Standards. All uses shall enhance the natural and scenic qualities of the business park and be environmentally friendly with efficient, clean operations. Noise and lighting shall be considered environmental factors in evaluating a potential land use. All manufacturing operations and storage shall be located within fully enclosed buildings. Properties within the Center shall be used only for the following purposes. Land uses not listed are prohibited. a. Corporate offices. b. Science, research and technology businesses, services, or laboratories where processes are environmentally clean and efficient. c. General manufacturing and assembly establishments where processes, fabrication and products are environmentally clean and efficient. d. Recreational facilities in accordance with the Center Master Plan. e. Conference and educational facilities. f. Parking facilities. g. Utility marntenance and service facilities. h. Accessory uses associated with a primary permitted use such as a day care center, telecommunication facilities, etc., in accordance with any established County standards. 2. Development Standards The use and development of all properties in the Center shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Article III of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 3 3. Preliminary Approval of Use The proposed use of a property in the Center must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Design Review Team prior to the transfer of land, or subsequent transfer. Any proposed changes in use of properties within the Park also must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Design Review Team. ARTICLE II: ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES A. Design Review Team - Appointment and Responsibilities 1. The County Administrator shall appoint members of the Design Review Team to serve as the working level review group for development of the Center. The Design Review Team may perform other functions assigned by the County Administrator. The Design Review Team shall be comprised of three (3) residential Community representatives, three (3) business Conununity representatives, two (2) professional representatives, and one (1) member of the Economic Development Department,. who shall also serve as coordinator of the team. The Design Review Team shall meet as necessary to mnsider land use or development proposals. 2. The Design Review Team exists to ensure harmony and design appropriateness of improvements :in the Center. 3. The Design Review Team shall recommend approval or disapproval of a land use in the Center, including: changes in use. 4. The Design Review Team shall review preliminary development plans and provide comments on development proposals :in accordance with the procedures set forth :in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 5. To ensure adherence to the approved development guidelines and covenants, final development plans will be available to the Design Review Team prior to approval by the County. 6. The Design Review Team shall be deemed to be a "mvered person" for the purposes of Roanoke County's self-:insurance program. The County will defend a rovered person from any and all claims or personal injury or death, loss of property, or damage to property aris:ing from construction, land use, conduct of business or any other activities within the Center. 7. In the event the Design Review Team is dissolved or terminated for any reason, all rights, privileges, responsibilities, and obligations of the Design Review Team under this declaration, shall transfer and be assigned without restriction to the designee(s) appointed by the County Administrator. B. Improvements, In General No construction,. exterior alterations, additions, or renderings to any existing Improvement may be initiated without submission of plans for said Improvements to the County and subsequently to the Design Review Team. Interior alterations which do not change exterior appearances are permitted without submission of plans to the Design Review Team review, provided such :interior changes do not change any use of the Property. 4 Review and recommendation of approval with respect to uses and improvements by the Design Review Team shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any permits or approvals required by any local, state or federal law or regulation Plans will be subject to all applicable federal and state laws and County ordinances. Pertinent ordinances of 1he County include, but may not be limited to: Zoning, Subdivision,. Storm Water Management, Erosion/Sediment Control and Steep Slope Ordinances, as amended. C. Subdivision, in General All property within the Center shall be subdivided in accordance with the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. The minimum lot size in the Center is one acre. D. Proiect Review Process All proposed improvements and land uses within the Center shall be reviewed by the County and the Design Review Team as set forth below. 1. Initially, proposed improvements and land uses shall be rusaISSed wi1h the County Department of Economic Development for general consistency with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. 2. After the initial review, the County Department of Economic Development shall arrange for a meeting of the Design Review Team and forward p:relirninaIy improvement or land use information, as specified. in Section E below, to the Design Review Team for review and recommendation. 3. Upon reviewing the proposed project, the Design Review Team shall make its recommendations in wri~ to the County Administrator. 4. The County Administrator shall accept/approve or reject/deny the Design Review Team's recommendations. If the County Administrator accepts/approves the Design Review Team's recommendations, a final development plan may be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for official County review. If the County Administrator does not agree with the recommendations of the Design Review Team, then the County Administrator shall discuss any objections with the Design Review Team to resolve issues and reach consensus prior to making a formal decision regarding processing of the final development plan by the Zoning Administrator. 5. Upon receiving a final development plan, the Zoning Administrator shall ensure that the proposed improvement is consistent with all applicable County regulations and with the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants (a proffered condition of zoning for the property). 6. Final development plans shall be made available to the Desig;n. Review Team prior to final plan approval by the County. 7. Any final decision of the County Administrator or Zoning Administrator with the respect to the Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants may be appealed to the County Board of Supervisors by filing a petition specifying the grounds for appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision 8. Any final decision of the Board of Supervisors may be appealed to the Roanoke County Grout Court by filing a petition specifying the grounds for appeal withID thirty (30) days of the decision. 5 E. Project Review Procedures All proposed development and land uses shall be reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as amended. For the purposes of Design Review Team review of the proposed land development, preliminary plans for site development and buildings are to include the following information: 1. Plans shall be of a suitable scale and size to permit reasonable review of the proposed development 2. Plans shall provide applicable information on lot size, building size, parldng areas, and areas for landscaping/open space. 3. Plans shall indicate the footprint of all proposed buildings and structures to be located on the site. Future improvements shall be shown as proposed future development 4. Plans shall indicate building setbacks, right-of-way limits, and utility or other easements. 5. Plans shall indicate any natural watercourses or proposed areas for storm water management 6. Plans shall indicate the location of large stands of trees and/or single large-canopy trees on the property. 7. Plans should include a preliminary ~ding plan,. if available. 8. Plans should provide additional information on signage, lightinp" refuse collection, trails or other site development elements, if available. 9. Plans shall include preliminary building elevations showing building fac;ade elements, exterior materials, and accessory elements (i.e.lot lighting fixhrres, sign structures). 10. Plans shall include general location information for any exterior or support utilities. F. Maintenance of Improvements All properties, buildings, structures and improvements shall be maintained in a neat, clean and attractive condition at all times. Landscaping and open grass areas shall be kept clean and free from weeds, underbrush trash and debris at all times. Painted and exposed metal surtaces shall be maintained and kept free from peeling or rust Parldng areas and drives shall be paved and damaged pavement or hard surtaces repaired. Property owners shall promptly replace any dead or damaged landscaping approved as part of the landscaping plan for the Property. G. Enforcement Enforcement of these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall be undertaken on behalf of the County by the Zorring Administrator. In the event of a violation, the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall have the ultimate jurisdiction to enforce or interpret any of the restrictions, ronditions, covenants, and liens now or hereafter imposed by these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. Failure to 6 enforce any provision contained in these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the provisions, whether the violation is singular or repetitive. After providing reasonable notice to the business, the Connty Administrator reserves the right to enter the property during regular busffiess hours to inspect the property and determine compliance with these Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants. If violations or breach of provisions are found, enforcement shall be as provided by the Roanoke County Code, as amended. ARTICLE ill: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and other applicable regulations shall be met for any development or improvement in the Center. In addition, the following development and design standards shall apply. A. Site Development 1. Environmental Features: The nahrral environment and vistas of the Center are significant contributing park features that shall be mnsidered in siting new development and buildings on the property. a Natural features such as streams, stands of mature trees and scenic vistas shall be identified in early planning and development designed to enhance such features for the benefit of all park inhabitants and the community. b. Grading for the development should emphasize natural landforms and scenic vistas. Where substantial site grading may be required, careful design consideration shall be j?;iven to building floor and elevation alternatives in order to minimize effects on the natural environment and inmIJX>rate natural amenities into the development 2. Green Development Encouraged: Site development and new buildings shall consider and inmrporate green development options and sustainable development were possible. Development is encouraged that is consistent with the U. S. Green Building Conncil's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards. 3. Buffer Areas: Dedicated buffers are established in the Center to protect adjacent residential properties. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet,. except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet There shall be no private development or operations located within these buffers. Where development is proposed adjacent to these buffers, every effort shall be made to foster compatibility between the land uses and to ensure that appropriate measures are undertaken to minimize potential development impacts from noise, lighting, loss of vegetation, and hours of operation. The Design Review Team will provide insight and guidance ~arding appropriate uses and measures to minllnize effects on neighboring residential properties. 4. Circulation: New buildings shall be designed to facilitate and enmurage pedestrian activity in public areas and in open spaces or along greenways. Linkages to public areas shall be included in the design of the site and buildings. Linkages between other Center properties are encouraged, where feasible and appropriate. 7 B. Buildings 1. Siting and Location: A recommended building siting diagram is presented below. a Buildings shall be located on the site such that the development establishes an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and parking and enhances the natural and man-made features of the Center. b. Buildings shall be sited on the property to relate to primary street(s) in the Center. c. Building setbacks shall be consistent with established zoning regulations and shall consider relationships to buildings on adjacent properties, particularly as it may affect views and street appearances. 2 Height: Building height shall be as set forth by Roanoke Connty Zoning, as amended. a Proposed building heights shall consider relationships to adjacent building heights, natural features and scenic vistas. b. Variable building heights are encouraged. 3. Design: All development shall meet the following design standards for exterior facades, materials, appurtenances and equipment a. General Building Design: L The architectural composition, scale, elements, and details of a building shall relate to the site's natural features and character of the SUITOnnding area and development 11. Landscaping shall be an integral component of the exterior design of any building. 8 ill. All buildings shall minimize potential impacts from noise, light and traffic. b. Building Facades and Materials: 1. Buildings shall employ various architechrral forms to create visual character and interest. Buildings shall be segmented with distinct masses of vertical and horizontal elements to minimize bulkiness. IL Front building facades and those facing public streets shall be designed to exhibit attractive architectural features, materials, dimensions and symmetry. Brick. stone, architectural masonry and glass are the preferred exterior materials. Metal may be permitted when it is used in am junction with other preferred ardritectural materials or when not visible from public streets. ill. All building facades shall be painted and/or finished architecturally in a manner that is consistent with these standards and with other properties in the Center. Paint colors should be compatible with the visual character of the Center. Two or more colors are encouraged to highlight architectural details and materials. IV. Building walls shall include dimensional architectural features (i.e. indentations, overhangs, entrance canopies, etc.) to provide attractive building mass and proportional building elements. Building walls are encouraged to be variable and not consist of expansive surlaces without a physical and visual break. v. Building entries shall be clearly visible and articulated using architectural feahrres, elements and materials. vi Windows shall be visible on all publicly-oriented building facades. The size and location of windows shall relate to the scale and proportions of the building elevation on which they are located. Vll. Roofs shall be designed to be an integral component of the architecture of the building. Multiple roof lines and offsets are encouraged. Also, roof desi~ are encouraged to incorporate "green" technologies, as recommended by LEED standards. c. Building Appurtenances and Equipment 1. Where required, roof mounted equipment and vents shall be located in an inconspicuous location and shall be reasonably screened from public street views by painted panels, opaque screens, or other effective methods. 11. All exterior equipment shall be designed to minimize noise and shall include appropriate insulation materials or technologies to control outside noise. Ill. Exposed features such as gutters, downspouts, vents, towers, etc. shall be desiW1ed to match the color of surlaces to which they are attached 9 C. Parking, Loading Areas and Docks 1. Parking for employees shall be located in areas that are removed from the primary public street entrance. 2. Parking for visitors shall be located in dose proximity to the main building entrance and shall be setback from the public street so as to not interfere with or detract from the primaIy street views of the building. 3. All parking areas shall be landscaped both internally and externally to enhance the architecture of the building, the site, and the Center. 4. Loading areas and docks shall be located in areas not visible from public streets and shall be appropriately screened and landscaped. 5. Lighting ill parking and loading areas shall be as described in the following section on lighting. D. Utilities 1. Underground Utilities: All utilities shall be located underground. unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. 2 Public Water and Sewer: All developments shall be served by public water and sewer systems. 3. Storm Water Management Areas: Low-impact design (L.I.D.) methods of managing storm water shall be considered in desigrring the development All srorm water management areas shall be landscaped appropriately and maintained. Management areas and drainage channels shall blend with the landscaping of the site and incorporate natural materials and vegetation. E. Wastes I. No external waste treatment or storage facilities are permitted. 2. Bulk containers for trash are pennitted, provided they are constructed in accordance with the standards for accessory structures. F. lighting 1. Palette of Ughtin~ Fixtures: The County has a selected palette of lighting fixtures recommended for both private and public development areas withm the Center. Examples of recommended lighting fixtures are shown in Exhibit 1. 2. lighting, In General: a All lighting in the Center shall be in accordance with lighting standards established in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. All lip;hting in the Center shall be directed inward toward the building/site, and shall be shielded and directed downward to control extraneous light or glare. All light shall be 10 contained within property boundaries. Where development is located adjacent to buffers and residential properties, dark/ni$t sky friendly li$ting using full cutoff li$ting fixtures :is encouraged so that there is no direct li$t upward and no glare. c. Signage and li$ting of employee and visitor parking lots shall be no greater than 25 feet in hei$t, and kept to the minirnwn necessary for direction and safety during operating hours. d Walkways and building entries are enrouraged to have ground level li$ting or pedestrian scale lights not exceeding 15 feet in height G. Accessory Structures 1. Walls and Fences: Walls and fences shall romplement the architecture of the building and be of materials that architecturally enhance the building and the Center. a Fences shall not be permitted in front yards. Where fencing is needed, decorative metal fencing is preferred; chain-link fencing is not permitted unless it is not visilile from public streets. Barbed wire is prohibited. b. Where retaining walls are required in the front yard or where they are visible from public areas, wall materials shall be stone or finished masonry. Retaining walls hi$er than 8 feet are discouraged. Long expanses of wall surlaces shall be offset and be appropriately landscaped. c. As an alternative to traditional retaining walls, "green walls" consisting of architectural concrete block covered with a rapidly-growmg groundcover, may be permitted in less visible areas. d Terraced wall systems are encouraged supplemented with plantings on the flat terraces. 2. Outbuildings: All accessory buildings shall be consistent with the architecture of the primary building. Accessory buildings shall be located behIDd the primary building or shall not be visible from public streets. 3. Trash Enclosures: Areas for trash collection shall be aCCessIble for service. All trash areas shall be fully enclosed and screened from view by opaque fencing and supplemental landscaping. Enclosures must be architecturally ronsistent and compatible with the design of the primaJ.y building. 11 c CI o , ' 'I ~~ ~ .," L, I . ,J I . I , - f to:. j Q.. all, H Landscaping 1. Landscape Palette: Ihe County has a selected palette for landscaping recommended in both private and public areas within the Center. Examples of recommended landscaping are shown in Exhibit 2. 2. Site and Bulleting Landscaping: Property and buileting designs shall include appropriate trees, sluubs, oper\ grass areas, and flowers to enhance development and the Center. a. PropertiES shall be developed hL accordance with the screening and landscaping provisions of the Roanoke COlUlty Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Trees are encouraged along street frontages, in parking areas and adjacent to buildings to complement the building scale. c. Landscaping shall be used to define entrancES to buildings and parking areas, as well as screen accessory StruCturES, loading areas and outdoor equipment areas. 3. Parking IDt Landscaping: a. Landscaping of parking areas shall be as required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. b. Planting islands should exhibit a well-maintained, finished appearance. 4. Buffers: a. Where buffer yards are required, landscaping shall meet the requirements set forth in the Roanoke COllilty Zarung Ordinance, as amended. b. Where the Center adjoins residential property, the buffer shall be a minimum of 100 feet, except that the buffer adjacent to the Glenvar Heights Neighborhood shall be 300 feet. 13 c (;1 w ./, ~ '" .' ,JJ. " r 1.._..- - .... 'V ~ \',J -. !-"r-) ~ 7"1 ~.. ~, ,-. '. .. ~ I. Signs 1. Sign Palette: The County has a selected palette for recommended public and private sigpage within the Center. Examples of recommended signs are shown ill ExlLibits 3 and 4. 2. Sigll NumbeI: No more than two primary signs per business may be erected on a property. One sign may be attached to the face of the primary building and one may be erected as a grom1d, monument sign. 3. Sign Size and Design: a. The sign shall be designed to be integrated and coordinated with the building to complement the building design in scale, color and materials. b. If placed on the building, the sign shall not exceed 150 square feet in size or ten percent of the front fac;ade, wlLichever "is less. If erected as a ground monument structure, the sign shall not exceed 60 square feet in size and shall not exceed twelve feet in height. Ground monument si?;IlS may have two faces. Ground monument signs shall be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the front property line. c. Lighting shall be from directed, shielded sources toward the sign. Signs shall not be back lighted. d. Signs shall not include any motion devices or changing text. e. Roof signs and portable signs are not pennitted. 4. Directional Si?J1S: Directional signs shall be located as necessary to direct visitors, customers and employees to designated parking or loading areas. Directional si?;IlS shall be kept to a minimum and shall not include any logo or company identification. Directional si?;IlS shall be 3 square feet or less in size and shall not be lighted. 5. Temporary SigI1S: Temporary SigI1S for the purposes of cOl1Suuction activity or the sale of real estate shall be as pennitted by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. No other temporary signs are permitted. 15 (; o Q :- , " - / ,I ~ - I ,. L . t ~ ~ - . ) 0' 11 l , c o ~ . .. . ] :~ .. -t-, . . I '. i :""' 0.. I. Transportation Elements 1. Access Points: Site access points shall be kept to a minimum and consolidated. New driveway entrances shall be coorclinated with existing entrances and adjacent uses for safe traffic circulation 2. Traffic Impact Study: A more detailed traffic impact study may be requested for proposed developments having the potential to generate large volumes of traffic, either as a result of operations or employment J. Temporary Construction Structures and Utilities: 1. Construction activities shall be ill accordance with all applicable federal, state and local land clisturbillg regulations. 2. Site access shall be restricted to one location on the public street. 3. Temporary construction structures, portable offices and other related facilities shall be maintained ill good condition and arranged :in a compact and organized manner on the site. Facilities shall be situated so that they are unobtrusive and attractive when seen from the road or adjacent properties. All temporary structures and portable facilities shall be removed upon the completion of construction activity and before permanent occupancy of the building. 4. All temporary construction utilities shall be in a single, unobtrusive alignment. Distribution to the various areas of construction shall be from an approved, on-site location 5. Areas for the storage of construction equipment and materials shall be coorclinated and be visually unobtrusive from the public road and adjacent properties. Mobile equipment shall be aligned in an orderly manner at the end of each work day. 6. Construction debris shall not be allowed to accumulate during construction It shall be removed daily or located in a visually screened place if debris is to be removed less frequently. Open bunung of debris is not permitted. After construction is complete, any temporary barriers, surplus materials, and all trash and debris shall be removed from the site. All backfill materials shall be cleared of any building materials, stone, or debris. K Design and Maintenance of Common Public Areas 1. Standards for Gree:nways and Trails: Trails and greenways established ill the Center shall be constructed ill accordance with County adopted recreational standards. Trails shall be a minimum of four feet in width and shall have paved or stabilized surfaces to provide safe surfaces for users and minimize erosion. Steep trails may be constructed with an earth surface using appropriate construction teclmiques to minimize erosion. 2. Maintenance of Common Public Areas: All public areas used by businesses and visitors shall be maintained and kept in a safe and attractive condition. Where there is joint use of facilities, such as trails or open space areas across private areas, public access and maintenance shall be negotiated under separate agreement with the County Administrator aI"ld the Center property owner. 18 c e _AG3 _EP _AG1 AR _AV C1 ~ _C2 . C2CVOD 11 _12 / .peD / PRO / .PTD ~ R1 R2 R3 R4 C N Roanoke County A Department of Community Development Applicants Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al Existing Zoning: PTD & R1 Proposed Zoning: PTD Tax Map Number: 54.00-1-2, 64.1-5-2,064.1-5-1,54.00-1-2.1,63.00-1-1 Magisterial District: Cata\>vba Area: 479.55+/- Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1" = 1 ODD' c .... III D o a a Land Use _ Conservatkln _ Rural Preserve _ Rural Vtllage \\lIage Center DevelQpI1enl Neighborhood Conservation _ Transilioo _ Core _ ?rincipallndus1rial o Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors et al Existing Zoning: pro & R 1 Proposed Zoning: pro Tax Map Number: 54.00-1-2,64.1-5-2, 064.1-5-1,54.00-1-2.1,63.00-1-1 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 479.55+/- Acres 16 March, 2007 Scale: 1" =; 1000' A February 20,2007 RECEIVED ~ t din Z007 1'1\{iE:........~ Teresa Becher, PE Transportation Engineering Manager, County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Roanoke County Center for Research and Teclmology Master Plan Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report Roanoke County HSMM Commission No. 30181 Dear Ms. Becher: Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the draft Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Master Plan Traffic Impact Analysis report for your review and comment. Copies of this report have also been submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation for their review. Upon receipt of your comments, we will incorporate any needed revisions and prepare final reports. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to give me a call at (540) 857-3322. Sincerely, HSMM I A )~,{~ - \ 1. Scott Hodge, PE Project Manager JSH/akcb Enclosures: As noted C: David Hill, Hill Studio, PC (wi enclosure) Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc. ARCHIHCTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS I" ..... , , ..." n..""" '.'" "'."", . ....,,.,,... ...'.".' ..,.,.... . "."....... ,,,"....',", ,Pbi1ip.-'!:IJg01P?()1) ". f~,cl;,B.~gJ3I~pr9ftllt-, ~lJ,b.lllittf3d..2~29~q7" . .., page,,1 From: To: Date: Subject: Teresa Becher Philip Thompson 3/13/20075:01:52 PM Fwd: RCCRT-Draft TIA Submitted 2-20-07 FYI >>> "Anne Booker" <abooker@hsmm,com> 2/21/2007 11 :08:28 AM >>> Good morning, We have discovered a small change in the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis submitted in draft form on February 20,2007, In Table 8.1 - Required Left Turn Treatments, no left turn treatments are required for the northbound or southbound approach at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive for either the AM or PM peak hour. This change will be incorporated into the final report revisions. The text following this table as well as the text contained in the conclusions will be modified accordingly. Additionally, we will include the Twine Hollow Road approach (at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive) in the analysis with the final submittal. We have investigated the turn lane requirements and capacity analysis with the inclusion of this approach. No additional turn lanes are required with the inclusion of this approach, The levels of service for the eastbound (Twine Hollow Road) and westbound (Glenmary Drive) approaches are still acceptable with no less than LOS D is design year 2022 with acceptable vlc ratios. I apologize for any inconvenience these two revisions have caused. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know, Thanks, Anne Anne K.C. Booker, PE, PTOE HSMM 1315 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24016 (540) 857-3326 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ Roanoke County Center . for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis Roanoke County, Virginia February 20, 2007 DRAFT T P ..\ (.J ~~: P () P T i~. T l () i-.I gl ') ~,~ ;~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ..... ...,....... ."............~ .~...,......",,_ ....~ ..u........ i) Table of Contents } i:g ~ tJ :,,1\,',' 'J 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Development.................... ................................................. ................................. ......... 1 7,& ~~ 3.0 Proposed Development ................. ....... .............................. ......... .................................... .......... 1 ~ 4.0 Existing V 0 lumes............................ ........................ .......... ................ ............................ ............ 2 ~ ~ ~ , ~ t1 , ~ 5.0 Proj ected Growth Rates ........................................................... ............................................. .... 2 6.0 Proj ected Development Volumes....... ..................................... ...... .................................... ....... 4 7.0 Pass-By Trip Adjustment...................... ...... .............................................................................. 6 ~ ~ 8.0 Geometric Improvements........... ...... ................ .... ... .......................... ......... .................... ........... 7 8.1 Left Turn Lanes.. ................... .............. ..................................... ..................................... 7 8.2 Right Turn Lanes ................... .... ...... ................................ ..... ........................................ 8 9.0 Capacity Analysis......... ...................... ...... ....... .................................. ......... .............................. 9 , ) ~ 10.0 Turn Lane Improvements and Capacity Analysis without the Dow Hollow Connection .....10 11.0 Conclusions................ .... ....................... ............................................ .............. ...................... 12 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ HSMM Pp'h",,,", ')(\ ')(\(\7 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT .... - M-'-'-" . ._ __P- - List of Figures Figure 5. I-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Background Volumes ............................ 4 Figure 5.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Background Volumes............................. 4 Figure 6. I-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................... .............. 6 Figure 6.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................... 6 Figure 10. I-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection... .................................................... .......................... 10 Figure 10.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection.. ................................ ..................... .......................... 11 List of Tables Table 4. I-Current AADT Volumes Reported by VDOT.......... .................. ......... ................ ....... .....2 Table 4.2-Directional Distribution on Dow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive..................................2 Table 4.3- Directional Distribution on Glenmary Drive...... ...... ..... .......... ...... .... ............. ............ .....2 Table 5.l-Dow Hollow Road - Historic Traffic Data......................................................................3 Table 5.2-Prunty Drive - Historic Traffic Data ........................:......................................................3 Table 5.3 Glenmary Drive - Historic Traffic Data ..........................................................................3 Table 6.1- Entering and Exi ting Vehicle Volumes ..... ............................................. .................... .....5 Table 8.1- Required Left Turn Treatments........... ...... ......................................................................8 Table 8.2- Required Right Turn Treatments......... ........ ............. .................................. .................. ...8 Table 9.1-HCM Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ...... ................................9 Table 9.2-Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results.. ...................... ......... ....... ................. ......1 0 Table 10. I-Required Left Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow Road Connection...... ........................ ............................... ............................................ .11 Table 10.2-Required Right Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow Road Connection................................ ......................................................................... .12 Table 10.3- Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results ......................... ...... ........ ........... ........ ...12 Appendix Appendix A-Proposed Development Layout Appendix B- Trip Generation Appendix C- Figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix D- HCS Analysis HS:MM 11 February 20,2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic hnpact Analysis DRAFT ~ - ...,,~....... ...-........~ _ ~u _ ~ - -~-"...--~ .....'-'""~-,. - -- -~ - 1.0 Introduction } ~ ~ ) ) HS:M:M was commissioned by Hill Studio, PC to perform a traffic impact analysis for the updated master plan for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology development in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. This development includes light manufacturing and general office facilities. Two facilities are currently in operation within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton. The Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is located adjacent to 1-81, Exit 132. Glenmary Drive currently serves as the only access to the park. A future connection from Dow Hollow Road is planned for the park. This report includes a description of the existing and proposed development, discussion of existing and projected volumes in the study area, examination of geometric improvements, and capacity analysis. Sight distance analysis was not performed as a portion of this study. This report supersedes the previous reports for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. ~ j' > 2.0 Existing Development ~ ) II r Two facilities are currently in operation within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology: Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton. Tecton currently employs 20 people who work from 6:30 AM to 6:45 PM. Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. currently employs 80 people who work from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Future expansion is planned for each of these facilities. This expansion is discussed in later sections of this report. ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ Speed limits are not posted for Dow Hollow Road, Prunty Drive or Glenmary Drive. In 2003, Glenmary Drive was reconstructed to provide an improved connection to the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology. The design speed utilized for the reconstruction was 40 miles per hour. 3.0 Proposed Development ~ At full buildout, the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is planned to include an additional facility for Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., an additional Tecton building, and six additional lots. Per conversations with Novozymes Biologicals, Inc., additional employees are not projected for their existing facility. The same number of employees (80 employees) is projected for their future second facility. The hours of operation for their second facility are projected to be the same as their existing hours of operation, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Per conversations with Tecton, the full buildout of their facility (including the additional building facilities) will accommodate 200 employees. A second shift will run with the additional employees. The hours of operation for the second shift will be 6:30 PM to 6:45 AM. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The proposed master plan is included in Appendix A. Future employment levels were provided by Hill Studio, PC for the vacant lots. Based on relative lot size, lots 2, 4 and 5 will accommodate manufacturing buildings which are the approximately the same size as the full buildout of Tecton. Lot 1 will accommodate a building three times as large as the full buildout of Tecton. Lots 3 and 6 will be general office buildings. Based on allowable lot coverage rates, lot 3 will have an 80,000 square foot building. Lot 6 is somewhat remote in location and is not ~ ~ ~ ~ HSMM February 20,2007 ::-.,..j/;~:"":'~':1::!"'-"".t~"-'''_._!i7i!'i.~,jM"~?,Pi~~1o,1if'~~~~'F.':~~A~''';-O'''~''='''''''''''" '-l'-~'~~'~'.:fo':~.,';l~~~"';-l::'~e..;:s-.r.~;;.<.-'-..:y.....:~.."..-~*~~~~_;,~~;r,-~k"~~I~'Q.~"'jo,-';;:;-,,....~~~._"",,~"'_._~~.t~~~{..~~;';~.-:.:.~' ~ '. ~t , ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT j; -~'" "'....... ..,,, ~. -~ '" ~'.. ~=.~ ~,................--<. = ""... ,,~~ '"""'-" 1l. ." expected to accommodate a large facility. This lot was assumed to accommodate a general office building which would employ 1 00 people. Trip projections for the future buildout of the park are based on these employment levels. ~ ,J ;' " ~ 4.0 Existing Volumes ~ ;. ~, Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and are reported in Table 4.1. :l ,. ~ v Table 4.1-Current AADT Volumes Reported by VDOT w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Road Volume (Vehicles per Day) Dow Hollow Road 110 Glenmary Drive 426 Prunty Drive 104 ~ " Based on the current employment levels of Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. (80 employees), the peak hour of Glenmary Drive is expected to represent twenty percent of the AADT. The peak hour ofDow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive is estimated as ten percent of the AADT. The directional distributions along the network for A11 and PM peak hours are shown in Tables 4.2 and 4.3. The directional distribution for Glenmary Drive is estimated using the entering and exiting percentages for the general office land use contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual as discussed in a later section. ~ ~ ~ Table 4.2-Directional Distribution on Dow Hollow Road and Prunty Drive ~ ~ " ~ Peak Northbound Southbound Hour Percentage Percentage AM 50% 50% PM 50% 50% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ Table 4.3-Directional Distribution on Glenmary Drive Peak Eastbound Westbound Hour Percentage Percentage AM 88% 12% PM 17% 83% 5.0 Projected Growth Rates ~ The historic Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes available from VDOT were examined for Dow Hollow Road, Prunty Drive and Glenmary Drive. The AADT for Dow Hollow Road was 100 vehicles per day in 2000 and 110 vehicles per day in 2006. From this data, a growth rate of 1.6 percent was computed. The AADT for Prunty Drive was 80 vehicles per day in 2000 and 104 vehicles per day in 2006. From this data a growth rate of 4.5 percent ~ .. l\ . HSMM ') Februarv 20.2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT - - -..,........ -= '''''""''" ......~ .....~ .. ......... was computed. This rate was deemed to be excessive given the lack of development along Prunty Drive. Therefore the growth rate established along Dow Hollow Road was used as a more representative growth rate for the area. AADT data was not available prior to 2006 for Glenmary Drive. There has been no development along Glenrnary Drive in recent years. Growth associated with the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology will be accounted for within the trip projection rates discussed in a later section. Therefore, the consistent 1.6 percent annual growth rate was assumed for Glenrnary Drive based on the data available for Dow Hollow Road. k If . ;1 Tables 5.1,5.2, and 5.3 summarize VDOT reported AADTs by year as well as the quality of the reported AADTs. ~ } Table S.l-Dow Hollow Road - Historic Traffic Data ,f Year Volume Type of Count (Vehicles per Day) 2001 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2002 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2003 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2004 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2005 100 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2006 110 Actual Count Data, 2006 ~ " ~ " i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Table 5.2-Prunty Drive - Historic Traffic Data ~ Year Volume Type of Count (Vehicles per Day) 2001 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2002 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2003 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2004 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2005 80 Raw Traffic Count Unfactored, 2000 2006 104 Actual Count Data, 2006 ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ) ~ ~ Table 5.3-Glenmary Drive - Historic Traffic Data ~ Year Volume Type of Count (Vehicles per Day) 2006 426 Actual Count Data, 2006 , ~ A design year of2022 was utilized for this analysis based on direction by Hill Studio, PC and the County of Roanoke. Design year background traffic volumes are depicted in Figures 5.1 and 5.2 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. ~ ~ ~ '? l<. t~ ... ;~ HS.MM 3 February 20, 2007 ~ \ 'J ~ b Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT Lo -0 \92 ili o o:J co V 10 1:'0\ Figure S.l-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Background Volumes W~_ .. . ..,..~. ....,_~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ I ) o co 0 .JIL Twine Hollow Road o co 0 .JIL Twine Hollow Road ..n.... ..,~.... ~............., ~"'.....-..."...... - ....--...~. .."""',..... _w..............,.......-. u o o 0:: 3' o o :r: ~ o o Q) u '- (3 v > 'C o >-. +-' c :J '- 0.. aJ +-' o '- o e- o u La Lf) La UJ 0 coo -.-l L - 85 -.-l L -0 6~ Glenmary Drive 12~ 12- 0- -0 0 Q) 0 u 0:: '- V U ~ > 0 'C aJ (5 0 .... 0 I >-. '-- +-' 0 :: c Q.. :J 0 0 '- 0 0... 0 Lo -0 \13 ili o [l) l"- \,. en ^ )0\ V -'\0 .>- La -6 <.00 La -.-l L -0 90~ o~ W 0 -.-l L 6~ 90- Glenmary Orive Figure S.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Background Volumes 6.0 Projected Development Volumes Future development within the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology is proposed to be a combination of general office and manufacturing land uses. Trip generation was performed for these land uses using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides two methodologies for projecting trips associated with development. Users can select the average trip rate per unit of measure or a fitted curve equation. The average trip rate represents the weighted average of available data. The regression equation represents the mathematical relationship between the unit of measure and measured vehicle trips. This equation is developed as the "best fit" line of HSMM February 20,2007 4 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ~. - _~...........n..~ ~ ."" available data. When both the average trip rate and regression equation are available, it is desirable to utilize the regression equation. For most traffic impact analyses, the AM and PM peak hours ofthe adjacent streets are utilized for analysis. The AM peak. hour of adjacent streets typically occurs between 7:00-9:00 AM. The PM peak hour of adjacent streets typically occurs between 4:00-6:00 PM. For this study, the AM and PM hours of operation for each of the existing facilities was examined to determine the period of highest traffic volumes. The shift start time for Tecton is before a normal AM peak hour period. Additionally, the shift end time for Tecton is after a normal PM peak. hour period. Therefore the trips associated with employees entering and exiting the Tecton facility has not been included in the AM or PM peak hour totals. The Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. facility operates on a schedule similar to normal office operating hours. Therefore, the trips associated with future office buildout are assumed to coincide with the AM and PM peak. hour periods ofNovozymes Biologicals, Inc. The trips associated with the current operations of Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. are included in the existing background traffic volumes. The future manufacturing land uses are expected to operate on a shift schedule similar to the existing Tecton facility. While the exact hours of operation for each facility remain unknown, it can be assumed that the hours will not coincide with AM and PM peak hour of adjacent streets. In order to be conservative, an assumption that fifty percent of the manufacturing trips would occur in the AM and PM peak hour of adjacent streets was made. Therefore, the total trips reported for the AM and PM peak hour includes 100 percent of the general office land use trips and fifty percent of the manufacturing land use trips. None of the future Tecton trips were included since the hours of shift operations are known and do not coincide with the AM or PM peak hour of adjacent streets. For the future development, the volume of entering and exiting vehicles was determined using the entering and exiting trip distribution as reported by the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 6.1 reports the total number of entering and exiting vehicles for each ofthe peak hours studied. Detailed existing trip data and trip generation tables are provided in Appendix B. . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Table 6.1-Entering and Exiting Vehicle Volumes Peak Hour Vehicles Entering Exi ting Total AM Peak of Adjacent Streets 523 113 636 PM Peak of Adjacent Streets 181 504 685 The projected development trips were distributed to the two entrances to the park. Sixty percent ofthe trips are projected to enter and exit using Glenmary Drive. The remaining forty percent of the trips are projected to enter and exit using Dow Hollow Road. ~ ~ ~ The projected traffic volumes for the full buildout ofthe Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology are depicted in Figures 6.1 and 6.2 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. ~ t} HS:MM 5 February 20, 2007 " " " ,} " !! Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT t, j - ~ ........ ,-- ~..._w .""'_....~ _.v..~...,......... ~ ft .....---._ ~ .......0F7"~ n f~ These volumes include existing traffic volumes, projected background traffic volumes and projected trips associated with the full buildout of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology, ;~ " <:} .., ~! "0 o o 0:: :l:: Q o I :l:: o o <I.l 0 l- V U > 'i: Ql 0 +' 0 ^ l- +' 0 <:: e- ::J I- 0 0.. U :j " ~; h. ~;" , ~1 ~ ~ " Twine Hollow Road Lo o ~ 0 ~o ~ I L ,16D ili o r--- N I") N I") La II) La 0 coo ~ 0 -.J L ~ 153 -.J L ~47 6~ Glenmary Drive 10D~ 326- 226- :>, ~.. ~ b ~! ,~ -'\0 <'"y6 \ t:. 1 Figure 6.1-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ~ -0 o o 0:: :l:: o o I :l:: o o <I.l U L- V U > 'i: <I.l 0 +' 0 ^ I- "'"' 0 <:: e- ::l I- 0 0.. U o 00<0 ~IL La -0 ,315 ili o 0 co co 0 N La If) La co 0 (()O -.J L ~ 308 -.J L -224 6~ Glenmary Drive 121~ 199- 77- Twine Hollow Road ,~ 'Vg\ Figure 6.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes If additional development or revised land uses are proposed, the trip generation for this project should be reevaluated. 7.0 Pass-By Trip Adjustment Trips projected to enter and exit the site are a combination of new trips to the area and trips diverted from the adjacent street network. The trips that are diverted from the adjacent street HSMM 6 February 20, 2007 ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT .................ft ......."'" ..."'-'''-' "'., - - - -- .---== ~.. - - " ~ network are pass-by trips. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook provides pass-by trip estimations for specific land uses which may experience this phenomenon such as drive-in banks, supermarkets, high-turnover restaurants and the like. There are no such land uses proposed for the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology and no adjustments were made to the volumes along Glenmary Drive and Dow Hollow Road. ~ ~ ) ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8.0 Geometric Improvements On two-lane and four-lane roads, vehicles slowing or stopping to turn create a hazard for other vehicles. This hazard increases as the number of turning vehicles increases. The VDOT Road Design Manual provides guidelines for turn lanes on two-lane and four-lane highways. These requirements are based on the design speed, turning volume, approach volume and opposing volume. ) ~ Due to the highly directional nature of the proposed development, required geometric improvements were examined for both the projected AM and PM peak hour buildout traffic volumes. The required improvements based on the projected volumes are summarized in the following sections. , ~ ~ ) 8.1 Left Turn Lanes ~ Glenmary Drive does not have a posted speed limit. The reconstruction project completed in 2003 was designed with a design speed of 40 miles per hour. Experience shows that the 85th percentile running speed, which is commonly used to establish design requirements, can be expected to exceed the posted speed by approximately five miles per hour. The left turn lane warrant charts for 40 miles per hour operating/design speed for two-lane highways were utilized for this analysis. ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Figures C-l-I.I thru C-l-1.7 Warrants for Left-Turn Storage Lanes on Four-Lane and Two-Lane Highways of the VDOT Road Design Manual were used to determine the required turn lane configurations for the intersections on the study network. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 8.1. The applicable figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual are included in Appendix C. ~ ~ ~ ;.~ @ HSMM 7 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis -- ~ .. _H' ~_ -" ..." "" - - DRAFT (\ - l~lI\ {I'V~ "/ If- wYv" ~ 1uM~ o LPf -tu>>~ Table S.l-Required Left Turn Treatments Peak Hour Intersection Approach Improvement Required NB No Left Turn Required AM SB kft Tum Lme with 75 _ft ;Ji Glenmary Drive and Storage Kequrred 1(' Left Turn Lane wit~OO -ft Dow Hollow Road NB of,storago RcquireG- N~) PM txft 'fum LanG wtfu 150 ftN SB of.....g{-e1"agc Rctfliircd AM Glenmary Drive and EB No Left Turn Required PM Prunty Drive No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and EB No Left Turn Required PM Corporate Circle -. . .. No Left Turn Required ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The only turn lanes required based on the design year 2022 proj ected buildout volumes are at the intersection ofDow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. However, based on the existing roadway configuration and the limited. space for improvement based on the VDOT limited access line, the addition ofturn lanes will be difficult to construct. Additionally, the current roadway configuration includes a shared left turn-through lane and a shared through-right turn lane. The need for a left lane is diminished based on the existence of t\:vo lanes on the northbound approach. Left turn movements onto Twine Hollow Road (directly across from Glenmary Drive) and delay associated with turning vehicles are expected to be minimal. The roadway section of Dow Hollow Road transitions immediately after the intersection with Glenmary Drive from a four-lane section to a two-lane section. , ~ 8.2 Right Turn Lanes Figure C-I-8 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (2-Lane Highway) and Figure C-1-9 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (4- Lane Highway) of the VDOT Road Design Manual were used to determine the required turn lane configurations for the intersections on the study network. The results of these analyses are delineated in Table 8.2. The applicable figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual are included in Appendix C. Table 8.2-Required Right Turn Treatments ~ Peak Hour Intersection Approach Improvement Required AM NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper Glenmary Drive and SB Radius Only Required PM Dow Hollow Road NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and WE Radius Only Required PM Prunty Drive WE Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and WE Radius Only Required PM Corporate Circle WE Radius Only Required ~ " . ~ if ~ HSMM 8 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Teclmology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ...rrv_ -- ~.."'... . - "~ ~ = - ....,.. ~" ~_.''''''''''''''''''--'LfiU~ _u ...~~ -_...,."""..-~>,,...... -" I f l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ) ~ The only turn lanes required based on the design year 2022 proj ected buildout volumes are at the intersection.ofDow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. As noted previously, a right turn lane on the northbound approach will be difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line. Additionally, the current roadway configuration includes a shared left turn-through lane and a share through-right turn lane. The need for a right turn lane is diminished based on the existence of two lanes on the northbound approach and the minimal delay expected to be associated with right turning vehicles. If desired, the shared through-right turn lane could be restriped to provide a dedicated right turn lane onto Glenmary Drive since the lane drops just after the intersection currently. 9.0 Capacity Analysis ) Highway Capacity Software (HCS) is based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. For unsignalized intersections, the delay experienced by the stop controlled approach is used to determine level of service (LOS). The LOS designation is a descriptive measure of operating conditions on a scale of A (best) to F (worst). Table 9.1 delineates the LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. In rural conditions, LOS C or D is considered acceptable. The vlc ratio is a measure of the approach volume to available approach capacity. As this value approaches 1.0, improvements to provide additional capacity should be investigated. ~ Table 9.1-HCM Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LOS Average Control Delay per Vehicle (SecondsNehic1e) A <10 B > 1 0-15 C >15-25 D > 25-35 E > 35-50 F > 50 The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the design year 2022 buildout conditions. Based on the difficulty of adding the geometric improvements discussed previously, no additional turn lanes or storage were assumed to be ill place for the buildout conditions. Table 9.2 summarizes the LOS, delay and vlc ratio results for each studied intersection. "" ~ ~ ~ I'lo HSMM 9 February 20, 2007 " .' ~ y ~.\ i1 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT 1\ " ~ - -~~ n..... ..........,....... -"..."....~ > ........-'''"' """"'"''''"......... ~... - ............,..~..,"'".,.. ..,...... ~-~ Table 9.2-Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results } ,. " Peak Intersection Approach LOS Delay vlc Hour AM Glenmary Drive and WE C 15.5 0.32 PM Dow Hollow Road C 20.8 0.58 AM Glenmary Drive and SB A 9.1 0.01 PM Prunty Drive A 10.0 0.01 AM Glenmary Drive and SB A 8.9 0.10 PM Corporate Circle A 9.9 0.10 " Ii ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ? > ~ ~ ) ~ ~ Each ofthe study network intersections is projected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the design year 2022 buildout conditions. Each of the stop controlled intersections operate with LOS C or better without any additional geometric improvements. Additionally, the vlc ratio for each approach is very low. Detailed reports from HCS for these intersections are included in Appendix D. tli ~ 10.0 Turn Lane Improvements and Capacity Analysis without the Dow Hollow Connection p ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ As a follow-up to the previous analysis, the roadway network capacity was examined without the construction ofthe Dow Hollow Road connection. The proposed connection to the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology using Dow Hollow Road will require significant grading and is expected to have a significant construction cost. For study purposes, the required geometric improvements if this connection were not constructed as well as the level of service at each of the network intersections were investigated. Figures 10.1 and 10.2 delineate the design year 2022 projected volumes for the AM and PM peak hour buildout conditions, respectively. '0 o o a:: 3: ..Q o I 3: o Cl QJ ~ Q) 0 > 'C OJ 0 .... 0 >> '- .... 0 c a. OJ '- '- 0 (L u o co 0 .JIL Lo -0 r205 I ! I o (XJ :;;:: l() m <D 0 La ~O La .-J L -198 .-J L -79 6~ Glenmary Drive 15B~ 535- 377- Twine Hollow Road Figure 10.1-Design Year 2022 Projected AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection ~ ~ ~ ~ HSMM 10 February 20, 2007 U~~~;~~~~~->>~~~"lB~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~b~~"t~~m<~~~~c~.~~~"~~~-::~~~'~~~~~:~-~;:~~~r:~-~~~' ~ ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ............"""', ._..u......_ . ~ ............ -...... fie.-........... C"_~ ~'-4-""" ~ ~ ~=~. ,.".,.-.... ~~ ~ . ........... ~- ~ ,;,-,,"""''''''~.C'''''''__'''''''oJ.>I r. " ~ -0 o o cr: 3: o o I ill > .-= o ill (J C- O ~ , 3: o o >- +' C :J C- [L ill +' o C- O e- O u ~ "l " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OOJO --1IL Lo -0 rS17 ili Q fJQ CO l"- N I"- La t"') La <.DO ~Q ~ L - 510 ~ L - 373 6~ Glenmary Drive 142~ 271- 129- ) Twine Hollow Road Figure 10.2-Design Year 2022 Projected PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without the Dow Hollow Road Connection ~ ~ Tables 10.1 and 10.2 delineate the required left and right turn lane geometric improvements if the Dow Hollow Road connection is not constructed. Table 10.3 delineates the level of service and delay of each of the network intersections if the Dow Hollow Road connection is not constructed. ~ ~ ~ , Table lO.l-Required Left Turn Lane Improvements 'Without the Dow Hollow Road Connection ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Peak Intersection Approach Left Turn Improvement Hour AM NB No Left Turn Required Glenmary Drive and SB No Left Turn Required PM Dow Hollow Road NB No Left Turn Required SB No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and EB No Left Turn Required PM Prunty Drive EB No Left Turn Required AM Glenmary Drive and EB Left Turn Lane with 100 ft PM Corporate Circle of Storage Required l1 ~ ~ ~ TTC1l.. Kl-.If 1 1 T:'I~1-_~__. f')f\ f')f\f\oI""J Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ,- - ~ -- - - o.o..,,~ .......u..... ,."" ..., '-'~~__. ..."'~"'- - - _......~=.__.......-=--~ Table to.2-Required Right Turn Lane Improvements without the Dow Hollow Road Connection ~ l I , I I t ) ~ ~ ~ ~ b Peak Intersection Approach Left Turn Improvement Hour AM NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper Glenmary Drive and SB Radius Only Required PM Dow Hollow Road NB Full Width Right Turn Lane + Taper SB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and WB Radius Only Required PM Prunty Drive WB Radius Only Required AM Glenmary Drive and WB Radius Only Required PM Corporate Circle Radius Only Required Table 10.3-Design Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Results ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Peak Intersection Approach LOS Delay vIe Hour AM Glenmary Drive and WE B 13.2 0.32 PM Dow Hollow Road C 17.7 0.65 AM Glenmary Drive and SB A 9.3 0.01 PM Prunty Drive B 11.5 0.01 AM Glenmary Drive and SB A 9.2 0.12 PM Corporate Circle B 11.7 0.20 IfDow Hollow connection were not constructed, the only geometric improvement required is a northbound right turn lane and taper at the intersection ofDow Hollow Road and Glenmary Drive. As discussed previously, this improvement will be difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line at the interchange. With the existing roadway network configuration, the level of service and vlc ratios at each of the network intersections remains acceptable. No less than LOS C is expected for any stop controlled approach on the network. 11.0 Conclusions HSMM examined the projected increase in traffic volumes associated with the proposed buildout of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology and identified geometric improvements which may be required as well as completed capacity analyses for the design year 2022 buildout conditions. ~ i} Based on the VDOT Road Design. Manual, a left and right turn lane may be required for the northbound approach to the intersection ofDow Hollow Road and Glenrnary Drive. This improvement will be very difficult to construct based on the existing VDOT limited access line. Additionally, the northbound approach currently includes a shared left-through lane and a shared through-right turn lane. Therefore, the delay associated with turning vehicles is diminished and turn lane improvements may not be required. If desired, the shared through-right turn lane could ~ ... ~ ~ "" ;~ HSMM 12 February 20, 2007 ~ '. n , ~ J Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT -='-- ~.=? ...-......--.... """" ~ .........-=-.-. ......-.,~ -..................... tl be restriped to provide a dedicated right turn lane onto Glenmary Drive since the lane drops just after the intersection currently. No other operational or geometric improvements are expected to be required for the proposed development due to the acceptable levels of service and capacity at each intersection. ~ ~ ~ ( If additional development or revised land uses are proposed, the trip generation for this project should be reevaluated. , ) ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ " HSMM 13 February 20,2007 ~ ~ ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Teclmology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT , ;i __~ "-,.""~"",,,,,.,,,~,~....-..uu _. ~. ~ _ ~ ~ ........" _.~....... .- ...,... - . . --.. ..,"'-............. ...............~-" ..-...... ~ ~ ~ r f} i\ ;t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ Appendix A Proposed Development Layout ~ ~ t t ~ ~ D t ~ i D ~ t (; ?i) ~ l& ~." ~, ~ fit :i:\. ~ HSMM February 20, 2007 ./ " ,./ ,/ ./ ./ "- " f j " " ..J' / .. ';, ".c. 'i/. ~. ~ .. \'i? \ \\ 3t sH "..-::;:::::::::--, .. ' '...::..........: 1lI~ ! (I >- () o ~ o z ::r: u t..Ll E-< Cl z -< ;:c U ~ -< t..Ll (/) t..Ll ~ ~ o t..L. ~ t..Ll t--< Z t..Ll U >- t--< Z ::J o U w :::.:: o z -< o P:::: ~~'I ~~: 0:;: IJJ" f-,i Ul:: . -< "~ ~. .,...... '\ \\ \:\ ,. I.' .." ~\\ i;j ,Ii /;' ~+;: Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT - - _ _ _"""-D......_................_--..~.."'" "'_ ~- _~~""""'~..'"'. ...,...W_.... "'=-'=I Appendix B Trip Generation ~ ~ ~ J ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &. i'" .... HSIvIM ., February 20, 2007 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ f-; ~ r::1 p . . ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ . . ~ . . ~ ~ @ o "0 ] o Q) E-< "'0 I=l ro ,..<:; Q a Q) CI) ~ H <8 H CI) Q)..-< ...... U) I=l >-. Q) - () (OJ .c~ 3"0 o (OJ ~l ~ 0 O!<=1 8~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OIl 0 >:: E :0 ::s .~ '0 ~;;> o 0Il~ >::,;: =e ~ ~ u ~ t p., OIl 0 .:: S l.. ., 0_ ..... 0 ~;;> o 0Il~ >:: ell .... ..... l.. = o 0 ..... u >:: .. ~ 0 p. "d o "'..... Q.c:l ._ l.. l.. 41 Eo-< = o c:> ~ ~ o ~ ~ -< ~ ~ ~ ,-... ;>., '- ;>.,.s 0':::: ~ ~ =0 S .- ell ~ CI.l~f=< r:n '-" ~ ~ "-l p., .... lo. E--< .... = <lJ 6 p., o .-< <lJ > ll.l ~ "C ll.l .... CJ ll.l ......, o ;.... ~ ell -a E .. o ~ -- 4l '" ;J~ ~ ell >::p. <lI ~ 4l en ;J ~ 4l .... U 4l ..... o l.. P. r'1 00 '<f( r'1 N 00 l"- N '<f( l"- I"- .-< 'D r<1 DO DO DO N , ><: r<1 CO c:i II E-< '<f( r<1 N ;f l"- I"- .-< o .-< r<1 N 00 I"- 00 00 00 N ;.:: r'1 00 c:i II E-< 0\ .-< ;f N .-< 00 r<1 .-< ;f 00 00 I"- 1.rl .-< 1.rl 1.rl .-< t ~ >:: .....:i o 00 c:i )L t:- i:I .....:i r<1 N ;f r'1 N 00 I"- '<f( l"- I"- .-< o .-< co 00 00 N I ><: r<1 00 c:i 11 E-< P.. , .-< 01"- v'-< .-< p.. ,~p. ci. I"I"""""IO~ l~ 01"-.-<.2.01"- ~"I"""""Ir-.-:;.?oo:::j'"""'" .-< P.-< . - 01"- v'-< .-< .... o ~ o o 1.rl 0\ 'D "'" .J u ~ g '" :::g o Cl 1.rl 'D 1.rl .-< OJ) i:I .~ u ~ g '" :::g ~ v .... u ~s 00 N o o o o 00 r'1 Cl o 1.rl 'D 1.rl .-< J u <.lS ~ t':l :::g "<t r<1 N ;,!( o r'1 N 00 I"- '<f( l"- I"- .-< o .-< 00 00 00 N , ~ r<1 00 c:i II E-< o o 1.rl 'D 1.rl .-< /:ll) .S E u ~ g '" :::g In 00 0 ~ ~ .-< V N ;f '2F- ~ NNr'1 .-< .-< N 0\ 00\00 V"l I"- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 I"- 00 00 I"- Cl 00 I"- Cl 00 "'" 'D 00 ,...., ~ v N o ~ C j 'D 00 c:i )L b Q .....:i c; .E .E ~ ....... ...... c- ..... -t-"l U U ~ <.lS :€ {3 ~ .~ 'E 'E o 0 u u <!) <!) i:I i:I o 0 ~ ~ .., 0) ....... - v Q) ...... ..... .... .... <!) 0) p.. p.. ,~ ~~ o o .-< ....... '" a) .... u ~s 00 * ~ @ 'D N U o a) 1; E-< Z ] o :> u S '" .)j DO 'E '" 'x <!) <!) -B .S '"d 0) '"d E u .S 0) .... '" '" ~ ;> ~ ~ ~ o 1" 0) DO .S ...... '" 'x v a) ..Q E-< '" .-< V ;> ~ ~ ~ o 1" a) a) E <8 '"d 1:1 '" OIl .2 '" 'x v d <!) .., z v ,J:) v u d <!) .... ~ ~ .... . <BE-< vO ~~ '" i:I :>-. .g ,J:) ~"g ~s~ .... :> p..o p..~ 'r:: E-<~ * '"d '" '@ '"d ..... ~ B : .S "S' 15 "'d Cil E '.8 Q '" .S ;:l i:I '"d a) .S Q) ..... ,.D ...<:l .... ~g'D(,<)r<1 ""' '" r'1 N ....... o ] 'D tr) .-< "#.. '"d o i:I 1.rl '" ..... ~ o '" v ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e '" i:I O./l 0 '@ .S U ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ .2 ~ t':l a) p.. Q) -B bD -~ '"d o 0.. '.8 a) u ~ '+-< o ..... o ~ o o c-- <::> <::> N <::> N Q oj 2 ,D Il.l fI-< N , p:::j OIl '5 .W ....... ..-< i:I ~ l-ll l-ll ~ CIJ ~ f--< ~ c:::4 I l l ~ ) l . . ~ . ; ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 6i) o '0 ..@ '-' II) f--< '"d ~ ..t:: '-' a II) '" II) p::: .... J3 ij) .~ "E ~ Q) - U ~ O<C c ....... ;:j 0 o cd up. Q),S ~ o~ ~r.;...; o cd p:::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ::e ~ ~ ~ ;E ~ .. ~ ,-,:, 0.. .... .. ~ .... J:I Q) e 0.. o ...... Q,) > Q) ~ "t:l Q) .... u Q,) ...... o .. ~ 1 bIl"" J::: E \D 0 0\ 0 V) 0';:: = N r'l 0 - \D .- - N r- - r- r- oo \D - M 0 - ~:> "" bIlbll J::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::,'Z ::,'Z ~ := c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- "" -.;;t -.;;t r'l -.;;t -.;;t {'<1 r'l -.;;t M ... \D \D 00 \D \D 00 00 \D ~ I. <&.l ~ bIl"" .5 E r- I. ::l N 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ \D -.;;t V) ""- ... N ... (of) - - \D .... 0 - ~:> "" OJ) OJ) J::: ~ 'C -= ~ ~ ~ ::,'Z ::,'Z ~ ;:R ::,'Z 0 0 0 0 "" "" \D \D r- 'D \D r- r- \D .... ... ... {'<1 - r'l M - - M J::: I. I'l:l: "" ~ "C <U "'.... 0.<"1 (of) '" 00 0\ '" r- 0 ._ I. V) 0 \D 0 0 0 00 l., "" ... - - - - 0\ 00 - E-< i:1 "" ~ '" '" - 0\ 0\ 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 t'Il N N 00 N N 0 '"3 - - r- - - \D , I + , , + S x x x x x x E ~ l-< 00 00 N 00 00 r- 0 r- r- - r- r- (of) ~ 0 0 .....: 0 0 ci '0 '0 II II II II II II <is <is E--< E--< E--< E--< E--< E--< ..d A ...... .... ...... .~ ~ -.. 'E 'j:g Q.l 0 0 '" P.. P.. 0 P.. P.. u u P Q.l , (of) OJ) , N , N \D I N N 'v) Q) Q) 0_ , 0_ i:I \::l "C t'Il or- or- -- or- or- -- 0 0 J:::~ -.;;t- -.;;t- r- p. -.;;t- -.;;t- r-ci ~ ~ t'Il - ...... - - ..:l ll) ll) '0 ~ .... ..... ~ .... .... II) II) >>.=l ,Cl.; ,Cl.; ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0;::: 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ =5 e V) V) V) V) '" \D 0 \D \D 0 .- t'Il ~ \D V) 0 II") II") - enf;l::"f;l::" -.;;t - 00 - - en '-' Q.l bll bll Q) bll bll ll) '" !:l l=l u Q Q u P .~ .~ !;l .~ .~ !;l <+-i <+-< "C 0 0 "" u () u l) .... <is ~ - <is <is "@ <J os Q.l a a .... g :j .... '0 II) i:I II) '" '" i:I '" ctl Q l., ::E ::E II) ::E ~ ll) ~ CJ CJ !l- ll) ~ ... ..... 'jj 0 - N (of) -<r 0 V) \D ..... ~ N 0 0 II) :> E--< 0 Z 8 ;::l '0 ~ o S ctl t:l bll .13 '" ';:;: Q) II) .s .S "C 00 II) \0 --d ("r) ;j C3 ,S t- ("r) 00 I{) <=> N ..... ll) .... cd ~ ll) ~ ~ .... i:I II) ~ o ~ II) bll ,S ...... lI) ';:;: ll) ~ E--< - t'Il ..... o E-< <Ii V ~ ~ ...... i:I ~ o j II) M - .,g ..0 g15 '--. '0 go;; 0.0 ,8< l=t .... os l-<~ * '0 r-- CJ o f'.1 o f'.1 Q cd 2 ..0 Q) P-; ~ o A 7j II) 0- Q.l -B .[ --d lIJ 0. '.E r<) I iLl II) u S o 4-< o ';J;. o o <I) - Cd '0 ..... Q .8 ~ .S ',5 11 '0 '" ...=! 1; '-' lI) .S ;::l !:l '0 II) .S ~ A ..... ~ g V) - -.;;t 00 00 0 'D-II") 4-< <I) o Jl ~ '"d ~ !a ~ ~ Q g, .g ~ ~ ~ ~ @ cd !:l bll 0 [; .S 1) ...... ;:) b ~ OJ) '6 ,1 1=:i 'R' ~ rLl ~ {/J P=1 ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Teclmology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ~ --~,..,. ".'" .-, - _I ~.....,~ ~ .. ,..,......., _.&'-OKA.'= ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ if r~ ~ " ~. .I' ~, ~f1 " HS:MJ\1 ~11 Appendix C Figures from the VDOT Road Design Manual February 20, 2007 I I, Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis m.... . ~ ) . ~ . to . > ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fAl tll f:J ~ ~. ~ HSMM DRAFT - ~ ~--- ,....... "'~_'C .",,"".>- ~ .." ~. ~ ......~ ., r<.-_.....~ ~.......,-'.... ...... ...-.nc....--....,.,,'" Figure C-1-1-2 Warrant for Left Turn Storage Lanes on Four-Lane Highways ,'[;:!C ,'f:;:')j, ..4X' -'. -. CL ~ t'E,)') ~ ..;= ::l ..v..o ~ '- ~c,) ~ t.... .~;"(.~) ',- ". '~r) ,-. . I SO~J Q " (..-5 .;,:;-" ~., " -'.- ...;. 2l'X BI\ocI- ~ .' ."""Jr".' -." :-. "70:." ,'"1: \1 f .~ '.\1 ., A ..~~~ ~ Jr~.~ .1; ~'\l~ ~ 0" j" - ; IT. " " ~:~" ..~ jl, "~ \.\ l." {- I.. . '..\ , il I \'. .~.. i ~"! '~.. ~ i,(!,\i~ -~~,,~..- ,':...'l ..-..-....;J... 'j.' '--1 I 'I t,: ['.. :, ).. ,~ ~ J., ~ l .J ",,'\ ~... '" .....'; !...:..t I -r" -.' _\.~,. ....~~:, "-..r....~.... "..1....;,... . '1''' ".. 1\ \.' " (' '. ~, "'v. -; "',,' ~ ~ I;, _\ '. j '\." '-. I _ 'L: '. , j ...." '\" :, ~r' 'j \.. \. i J f.iif:: i" '. \1 ,~ ....... ..... "_ ( r~~: ~':.J.. --,\:-.f- ~..~k \?-_,.. -t.~ -.~*; ~~ .:. -t;.. ..,1, >> .~ .j.., f~ ... ,+ ..... iTd I K ' I. I .'" I I '!-. '''' -', I'..t -:~ "'. .~i.. I I I I ~~9:' \\. ..c. ;d~......},.+~{:. ":1'i&.-"'~\" u ., .;~tE'1~.l1> ~i~ ! n" ....~FI "'jL nj.~. .- .!~ to !. ;\ '"\:' i l--IT "~_ ... t-:. . .1-',... f- '.1:x.' I ' i~N' ',..\J '. j f\ (~ r.,,'.. 1'" ").., ~ -..1 I I I ; ~':i=-~ ~~ ~ \- 'II ~ "'i I"" -"h~~ K. x-t:~ ",~..,;17 i~,?E- .i.... '\' ~". \. 1," ....... .1': I~_'>!....,.. ~ I J ; ~ ~V:-~. \. , ..,: \I ~ '-{~'0 ..~I !-:'~s,.I.. u,,,.:;::.::g::!...-". o::~ - j il. t:-; ~."1 u -l"~';,j- "j.g.;., - ;~~T' t:;l ,!:~;'!...~ ~ :~~~"..F~f$ ~~:" -.f.q" .J';+- .). ~.I,. 'F It.. J-r.y' '.; 't ~ /-"'" I r f.., "'" ,....;: ",..._ ~..J _..,. f I' I I t I j.. I '!- I I" 1 T I.,..:~L -~, ... .J=.L~:..L"...,.J__.".L_. ..J.LLL:;..J,=_~U.~LL~L.J.; )_"U.~_.,...LL" -.L,;,..J _Or G f9-::I:8. Un S, ';In f11 iZf,",j ]nlf: f.S'J{;101 S; S'-'-St-;:;'m'~8 LfJll;rlh RDqUiif:d .... u -I- r .. - . I.. - .c:...l , r.... Z.X "00 .1::0 4:~'} :i:~~1 ':;''Y. ._....;. V.!. I-EP.l ttf~I9.;tV/IVG l/GIJ/.~'t CllJ,er,') FJ GURE C-1-1.1 WARRANT FOR. LEI=T TURN S1'O RAGE LAN ES ON FO UR-LANE HI GHWA YS C-2 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ,... ~.......--........ . _or", ,-',.......~.._.~ ..... _ _ '0"'" ~ ...".._ _.. __~ - " - ., _.. ~.. .~ _M.' ..... - ~ - ~,_ "...... __vo............____ Figures C-1-1-2 to C-1-1.7 Warrants for Left-Turn Storage Lanes on Two-Lane Highways ~.:J .D~-.-~-i---'---L-, LLL l..j: I _~_; ,.. , : I ~ ~-,-~ ~~ j "j_ ~_l~_; I ~tT JT. I I' \, I J . J . - 1 J ~ T l.f1-L:..!:. i:': ~~_ I I++- i I I 1 I I n(:II\~". :'''::IliQ7u..I~),IIII'1: :...t:CIIr..*,:-....1 _I _+~tJ:.tj ~---r'- c..+- - -t-1 I I - f. J ~. _ 41 ::.... r t 'i'~r".. It"! \'"L l ~) CJI&;~ . -t;;.m-t: ~-1~'" - : i..l - ~,;......:-.,..."!'" :.,..H.':'t...... '.--'~1Jl r-'I ~ b: iZl-[+H- _ ~ '-i-J...!.:-!., ..... - I., +h ~ = ~~ -,.,' lur.~n~l:,;1,.:>....~'l"'- I I' I. . .1 1, ., I. I I " .-;,.....,..-.---;..- .. _ 1 ~uu =loJ=.j. , ,.j . ., ;...." . L~ ..;~!.;.:;:.~;...l;. !+-+Hf..', .- l I !-H'.:+.h-+'~'++r; ~ ~>OO 't; (T:;::.,f:;"L' .; ri.~'~);~1 ~ ;,: : ~~_'-t: ; ; -I_<'~: _:. ~ ,~ ':H ~ ~~ l':T I'-I:++++-~-+++_:J:"~+'~~~~! ~I~ 1, I j I' t-, -- -: T T; __1+ :J t'.~ 40-::;._Ll"Yi'J-1 I i l ~ , ~!o... --y - - _\.:.1-=_\-_.-:.. -ltl-~~- ,. '7 l" "". f 1"1; 1 '" 7 C.l"'1 :::t- __ i I' . - r-l- _ __ .l";'-h ~ :f()I)~l-.LI'.:ii~c I }. i':.: ttl-'- --j't1.-- '~'r~'~;~T'r:;--' . o ~!..~LL!_.\' i.I' -r-, ";;"1':':""1'- ., =_; =.,;_ LIu-'l -----;- ". : 'l ~'~~~' ,":1;;';';' l_~ -,,~ 'R: ~~ i~;:d~ i 'J~'" - . -.. - ;-' - :j " i-H-'- - ~; .~ I,) (1 ~.h, -r-' . .~. ~, it:' L' :.:::~. ~~. .: ~ ': .' := --r - -~=F ~ -- ~:=-I' ", -- -=::: -- e--- ., .+. 'I" .' ~I::' - -.,,--- Ef:"T- ! H= . T., )1)(1 -I I : ~ :\'~-.r+i~'---:---',-;--'-'=:-f'-l-=' ,-Hi--' . l; . .. . , I ,..,.. . LLt,'. I." .....L.+-.-! ._~- "1 ~ ~~I ~ f 1 i j 1 ; I l ~ 'TYu'r\{'j\: -. .::1:-i:::I=~::: -, -- .... "' .. !--! \L~.!5~ j-1~J 'tC: "1 1_1_ __'---1_1_ _, . .:.- ".:;0 o :( DQ 4CD' 600 :g 00 WOf) v;. ". D V ^ I\, C I N (; VOL U M E \ 1./ .. II :. FIGURE C-1-1.2 .~, '-.1:1 ~.~oto.~ J 30-;: I I I I I l; J l; IIL-.... n J1=~IIl,J I ~ b. Ii ~, t r;. :;~ ~~- v, HS:MM C-3 February 20, 2007 ) ~ Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT ......... - - _ ~r-'H.-_. ........'..T... .....- - ~ aOOI}~ .:-;-';: ~'f.-. .; '/.1 r--;.,~-;-+;-~ +-r-~~~J II 1 I 'r I -; :"~: j I' 'h':i"-a. 1"...H.~l<=~d r::..:.~r..~..r, t ,"t""jO~-H-':"";-~:- ,. ~~=~r"\'''''J==-- :-...:t 1..n(''''.I'Jrn;:r l:""~_Y.... ~ 1,,; I. . . ,T j . ;. Ell'81:t - ~"';t-"J",;-+ t.-9n~':.h. '-(l!o~l.ILf-.::r'S"! >- '~~_;_). . I _ ~~ I ~ ~ ! : ,-r- v - 1.0 llIr"h f.C:;>-tll711.':L~"".JrjQ].lr;= " 'I: L~\~l-:." J ' " .JJ 1 " ~j --" L - , "1 ~' 60L,+-H-H ,.:~ JJJ...: I ':~ ,-, ;lI~rr--- - i j *i+~-r;',; ..(,~~ '~l : " r-r .~~ "I h'~";"':1 1- ; . ~ ; :.( r~ f 4 iT. I ~1-: r I I; t.-. t d .5 0 0 I. I J -.t..lL:J..:J..\':. I I :": I ,I; ,'Jc' Lt' ,.) 11', o TI~~"'711~~I~~o:) I' - , '1.L".J {" ~,: ,"", \ ::.- Ia.:~....(.-,-~j-...,n:;r I j f lli.r..... !I----;- HfI':',;J:~1 'H +;rn......' l' i 1-1=1."';--1' 'i-oJ I ;'N-t-1'~j'+'. D fT1' '. ,r~.'." '1'.1..';','.' "'.1 I I ,-'. "'{-'.. ~" ' :-1 Z 40a-b:'I~:T,1:'::r~:~::,;:~~r1r 1 ; J': ';\' + :.:.. . :~t L,2 .. ;=t- _I LLl.:..li;..;,~, .,.. iI 1J - I I ". - r - -+:0... tit : u ~ . ~ r'FTc;;.,.' "11'. ''. ~ 'I 1'-, -- 11:-"-~ .1 .~ ~:ll' '.!' -:: ~_l~VH ~.' 'I+h- QL.:.r: ..... -r rrrf - I :: ,I ~[ '.-- f.-f"',-:::-,l.L':.' ,';.:.< ;:1\' , -,;<': I! ~::L~r= 1: ~ .:r'~' r I~ 00 J Nc LB fr-IIJ rD 12I'J' ~ j~ 'h'/:;1 -- .1::-,+ -~,~!-A:- -, "'1- ,.. ~ 20-0-1 L';~~ R~qucrE:!d::'~',~--r- 'TI.:Oc ,n-r"l,,:-+.~,-l--;::>....; is-O' ;;:~. C, I ' . .~ I ~ H3" I ' :1: l---'-'''- --'- .'" - ~- ......-,..- , ...-- , ~T~<"'.~'""'=-=.'=r"'-I"'l=l" . .,~ < '-- !-;.-- --1- til \.! . 1"-"- :> .. ; J , :' ;1 :.i ~1 ~. 1 ' -"I ~-I I ,- ~ - - -. "\.-:- :I .-_i_ -1-, ' ~ '(':, I I "l~' '-I' - . '. C ,~ I' t ''''- '-I !~ _ -~ I _ to It . E _ _ I I I 1 r "_.- 1 0 I I . , , ,: j I I I "1.:"" '. 'f~ ' I -r- },I I I . ~-k ,. ~ll:::' C; : -~,I:>F~; J. 17:H--~ ~. =1= I-~!=="h-+FH'-~;~--i O ~ ' -.1.~: 1 " iT h _' '__T-Ti,,::--:- __ ~I' I I j IT ;-Iffi'i 1 II }j.IIJ ;. "I" ! ~,..T1-r--, I' Till ,~'~n. () 2Q-.Q' -'100 .- 6GD 000 . i~;)OO .," . V", A ,0' V AN':;: I N G V G L U.h\ E (V PH) FIGURE C-1-1. 4 ":"c':J ~ ~ 'I , ~ !:: 10':;1 IE: ~ ~I . 1 ~ ~ ) ~ i} ii' - l,,') o 300 ~ 0.. , ~ ~ ) ~ ~ -l-~~i~r, I~; : ~ '" )1..J~ I E'- ~--I~{-';.'.; to. I -r--, \~t.~ ~,' H.- ~.J- ~ 9r~~"l. IT:;:::I.:l,I;r...e.;.J:l.a.... :n1.":-.l:tle.'":":.ij.rl~ .70("1 ,("~~1-i-IT- --t---r ~T+' .' :' I", J..- ;----- - :.! Lo-: -: 'Tl..!; .", P ,'- n ?, v + ; ,.:!' . 1. I .,. -!..- -11..... '\ ') . ._' _ ~ - ~~-:Jr&.l)- ~."!"n~to. R~"1{Ll;,.ilfl!!l'rj _.~ "1- -4-11~ i I ~ ; ..~- ~-;:-.~ ~ : \:-i - ___ ",'r - .-t.o 0"'.:,4, ,I:::-;Ig'itl~~:-.l:i\)rt.h~'='L'~:::a ~~~~ I :~-::'T ; ;',r-r--I Ii'" ";+-~; .:.. :,. - ~9'l }", ~l \' I':" I. -::~. _ I L't'-.- ;.'l~}. " I r :.1+. ~H.- k,i : : .LL-:- .\ i=n~ 1_".1 I . I .... F ~-t-.! 'I . -,~ .~.. T" 1~. I', ,. !' . . i-t\L!' t- ,,'I ~)'''11 'td! -L ~~; : : rb,~ ;.: · I l.j~J.;...~ \~ I - 1 -:;= ."~--I' : ++~ I I ,....-.J....j; ~1 _bil T' 1'1-"; : :~ ,,~' I I I _ i ' , I .. -=-;r-H-\.~ :.--, ifI J--\:'- ;~q+~.:.' I . ,,:::.. :,-1 {) '100Jiti +:'. ~ I :::.- ~ : -~ ; --: I: ,t ~.~._~Y-t--+I_~j - ; I z ., J I I ~' .L~~. J I I.. -+- r.fA1 [:"""""1:-. "T' l ".hj J '-1 ~ f '~. ~Ld..: J- --L - - ~I ; , ;ro, 30U'i.t'. I ' -I---'~---!. ., I" -I i ',,:::,:' '; 'It' ,.... L. ':'--L-- ~ _, . L _ . ,"" It, f\.' -, ~ ,"~, !'~, --- ';:- J." , ~. ~ I -I: . I I+f:"-L ; : ,~-~::-f-'--H'~l-"-'" ~- - -- - ~ I .: ra..t ,-t+-+-j, ..f\-;---j_ I -r-r-..r ....,- ~ Ie- - T ~';I- '~ ....: N <;, L c: f r ~ T ':.i In' 0\ : I I I ':". j =, 1 -~",t-[ ~:/ - ~ J' ~ ---F" ;:i' .:..'/ ~ , G 20 _. _ -;--- 'X ,I o. - I 'I " ,,1+ /S K:l _..."{-"~- _liH....' l(€'!julr"d. "~ t' .0, I : . T~..s;:t.]:;' Q,-p..!"T"S, -",- o +. I" ,j _I I '-:i\-LLT ' ~'I . ....-r-- n' I . '+: 1,-t+- ~ ' . I t i' r r;-;.-. l' I I . =: ...........~"t""" 100"~1~ I:' ':I';"'~T; 1 ' , ~-, '!,.,I.! '" I I' , ~', , ""'1' -t" I .~ ' 1, I Nl I I .+L.}- I ; .Lt /:, I , " L1"--1-' -H- .:: ~ I! j I \. I 1 'r --, I I ji=F . =T""r-- '.J --i o I -, I I ... " -t-.--i-' --, '.. -' r I 'I,. _ _'-LJ o ' 2 0 0' '" (f'D ' 60 1} : I !> .;) 0 ,. I J. I o~ ~ _. I' V/J, A OV A N C~NG VOU,U ",.., e ': V PH) Fl GURf C-1. 1. 5 I: Soo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II t,~ :;. LJ,I (: 0 '0'- ;- ~ :J Q -300 >- ~ ~ ~ ~ I'l:\ HSMM C-4 February 20,2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ , Ii ~ ~ 21.. ~ ~ ~ n.... HSMM DRAFT ..... ~ ...z-~ ....~ - --,.. r-'"J .._...,,~.....~"-"...__ :.Q.L~"''''' ..,,,...._~.........,."'.,- ~ .. ...t:&..A .. . - ~- ~,............. ................ S l~ _~-1...-l..l'r. - ~ l ~ G- ~T f: { : 1 ",1 j I -i ~ j I I 1 ~ I I: I j L .. I \1 r\.~ ':.;(....0.16 (.I:r''':701~':;j=..,.......:1 f;-~'=Ilrll~':.j.o=.. -'- lCD . I 'l':-~';- \.1' ~C ~'k-i-~-, ., : :':;:~':~~;;'~-'H~~"~r,." c. fit':~" I ' ! ''i '1 - -:++ ". <.~ ",,,t. ;:,~....."n.,'l'-"""" ,,;.;...~: :> I .'-1: N \1-.. ~H'+l" +y+o'~'1 ' :_;: . ;\.,' :. ~.: t. :", "Ujl 600 I. t-r'~' "--7/1 ' I j' ;, I I, ~ ..t'~:'f i I I , ~ ! I ,'-. _~~~.; ~ ...L...L 1, '-PJ--,- ~ ~ I I ! I ...... i ' - <. ~ l ~ I 11 I --Ir- e +++ f : :UL\~ L', ~i. : ,_ II 1'>Jr.,:_ '~., I, i~, I I I '; I : I ~ 5."000'5:' 1 ,~:"'=~:i~--'1' .'~r r- '-~""'i~Il-':~\!--'r,o-( " . I i ~~ : I I 1 -:~"- o . ,;, I I..; i7 I I I' \ ",I I, \ "', ,;:-].1 I' I I I I 1,' .ljl"'~'1 (11dl ,'~III (1"'-' i,,,,,~rl" Ii; ;;. T.; I' j.,:l \;111.. 1\'1 l",.,.~i'-i h,li.I" +.__.. 400 ::-." ,'I I '\ \1' T Ii' , I \j ,I". I '" "I t:t- =!= "'-' :, I o . ~- i I 1,'..1 -:t-! I",., I X '1:" I! ..... -' 'No. _' " .....'; I I z ;~~J.:=:...,:.-.'.;rTl.:'Y'l.""';' II!\'.I lil'''I\' I--~'.'--'_I III ~~-.o.. "<_~.".Ll :<:1.1- .1: I : I! if !I.:'.I I i f\.llll.~ : I~ I" ! I 'n }'.:JO,;,.I'.{Tt.; ....I.e .1' , /.1,1. I !~e' !", ,. .." _;~l>..:' OTT,':f1"r7T;; t \ , t '+' It -~ttF::S:I' I ". i ;};; . ,ty ~7~rr!I: """,1 ! I L '.' Ie. '-I-:-N-' rH '. '.' , , I' , -~J'~~_' :N.;)__~c.ir::'QlJr" ~~~-"""~--r ~~t~ I: ~.-' r,V'., '...' }.-f\1~. .'~ ~:::'l.,~{$O . R ' ".fl'. O. r-i .<~ - .-T1TI~-""'J. ~-. =_ry~~ I ~ o .'=.9/1~n' l;'g,'~Hr,!!' .,""fr- "~"':- ~(J ~ '.1.tlm-~r.:l . I~' ~..fY.j..~ ,';0 , I ':.> 100 .lITI. I.' :ft+t~~.'''. T?{-jI.'H.,_+I_f-'.i.t!!'7',. 'i,~~Sn~~, "i'~~, ~-i : ::: ',: I.~ If' ':::=i=Htf1+', " ~~.~!:rl': " ; : : ~~;.; ;ri'il,-t (;I ~'i': I I i iT' 1 -1-', I: 1 I.TI j'T--F; I I : I .".. '. I U'~' I " I I ! I. . I'" , I ".: _ " , '1~+J=IIJ (] 'l00 400 600 15 QG H~OO V.... /J.,[~'t/,:..~~(1NG VnlLJf,~.E (\'F.'Hl F"I GURE C. U ., . 6 c.. C- O 'JOO ~Oc;:i I ! I I' n-, \!~_+T-l-f I ! 1 I; .1-. ~)kf~:~ :tEl ~ 700J..tl,~ ~ I : '. of.-=-: -tSl..~_~tt.~ :~<q.,~'.ri":' ;> ~j! :;-:- :J . I I' ~'':::, ~ ++'bR-f:, ;"~ ; . \ , lY ~: r+.j- I 'c1, -H II I " "I " ..... I' : ". r. w L 00 I I I ~ I ! !. I ,. I I I, 1 ,\ I ,'d !, / j , .,_.1, ~ J:: '.. I ! I :,f~ . ,"::\ j 1...L..!J,!$t" ,', I 1" I 1 -~- ::, :_, ,: 1 :1:""" I' T ' "'t~l '"I I ;. __ I ; I " I I to. o 500}84'"I'; "~..:J3:.~,HJi_~!~::tjl\:J~R'N',:,~} - '.' ~ I l'l~.: ~ I > 'i 1 -l"~' j ~. '-. 1 f ~... I I ''''1,.. --L:' ,J' ' I -r- '''1" +'\ 'j:l' , " !, I I 't , '.J :.'! ,,_L~: -::. -:: :RJ~' . -;-; ~'"T' I . , I~!.. r' -""'- I' '...... ' -r.... - C" - ..... .r!- " . <.} tT '-r r'--~ "r -,_.:...... -'---. "V-+- ;' 10.. '>, '.' -I- i..- - ',.- ..., z 40Q. : ' I r \'.....:...1"::r L '~. '~' '.\.." r),' ~, I ,; ~:f I: ---' '. '. ~-_..r-'- -I-~' - ~ -LT"_.... L . i" _. ~ -, -., """ -_.\-. ~- ~~~tf r, \-- ..:....+-~ -'--~--'-- -... -',--, __'.J \..u-, l-" I ..,) - - ~l ~-~ ~ __L _~_..;:'_~_"~.c I!: . .j~~ \...:.-- -~~"-l-"'+'~ ~:.. ~-m ~ 300 ~':'ji 'Li' ','-'-/,('1\ :p'l- tJ:t"'.- e:l=S\.t- qj', :1t~.: f;~~~', I , o -.-" .. ..,....l_'_...., I--j-++i Ii. , . ,-j-,.......{ ,,,,' .".,.~ I -. c~!.f~o. '2:00 NQ ..1!J,'_L:_LU):.r! ~ , . ~; 1 l' I '..f' ~ J': 'b, , .... '...-;:-~(", '~..J c ., 0 n I? 'i J , ! 1 1 ';" L !', 1 :'S i';~. ".... t" oS. "........... -' " .;? :, "-l -." i -=.....--.:. ill" 'C1 I ,'~- './ -",." -- "),........._, ;:') S I .,- -+- "eq..jtt:d";-r.:r;~"'';'''j., . ,..;.-~.-;..~.,;l --i;: SO::'" ~ ,'j) , 0'1 HJ 0: I . I -:T 1'.1, i H ~:.... :-!_:....I), :-'~_Ir~i~' "'l..,j', f'~';-; -Ok: ~ ! T if'.. L ~ I ~ i I ---r--r-l. I I _ t \- I i -; II \ I ,.' 11 I' I I-r---.I+'I Lj 1 j I I I . f -1 - , !' 'I l I 7".-' -, -~l"""'" - -1- : ,..- ~I l)~I~ . I I'~~ ~--q:J~}t.tJLJ,+I_\,G~ I I g~/J< ,T - - 10'OrQ.:q=...:::._.,.l] e~=l~"~l;=.~ Ir.t.tw.~:~e~~ 1: 1.'Cf-t.t.. ':-;,;:-=-..~ i.~ ~^ ~~~(~~~ Lur.y~h R~~~~~~ .;:J. r.;.tt fr..,,vt1'...I.-:' ~ r.qll)..::; l";~ :i-;ol:'~'~: 4/J.:r VA 1". P V A N (; I N G '{ 0 '. U !'I', t ( \' i" H :. fiGURE C-'-1.! C-5 February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis _.- -""....""'''',--...,. ; " " " " " " ) , ; > 7 ~~ " -, . ~. ,~ !~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t) ~ ~c~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~" rA HSMM ~ - ~ .. - . ~.- Figure C-1-8 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (2-Lane Highway) 3 g ~ '" n: .') ~ -' ~ 1::,'1) t 10"'J'.. ,',' '~".'- t'.';'I"_'__:. ~:::::;::::::~::.~ =.;::::: :~:~:;:;:~::;..~ .::......_......-.-........... 1 uO tr:Ji~j:j~~~~i.~j~]::~rj~~j::DF~=-;:,~~ .' . ~ .- 4' .............. '.' . .' .' .... '.'. p . ...... - . - . '. '. .'-':.........'........'.........-..........,-....-......,'0 ::"::; ~i:::i=;.; :.:~:_: >:::::<: ;:"; ;:~;::_:: ::':~;;~; ~_ :-. !w- e ~ ~,~-:' :~:~::::: ::: ~:: :::': ::::::: -;:: :::":': :::,:.::::: :::': :::.:.:.:,'.. :;~:~::: :.:::>:!.:::.::: :~:~:~~:::::: :::::;:~::;-:: :':'::::~;;:;; :-,~. . '_'_'. ',' ...... .'.-.'. '.' . _~ .'.' .-.... . . . ..... .-.' . . . -' .' ..-.".._ . . . . '"'-J Z:;j{~' ~'.~.~:~)j :~~T ~.: n;< f:' ~ ~ ': '::j:: :.~::: :j( :::\: i~;:.; , '"-":". .-....... .-. .....~._..'. . .'. '.'-' . .' ......... '," ..... .-.'... '.' ..... ..... ',' -.... --:,..... .. .. .'. .~' .-.. .'. .....' .'.-.'. . -. '.'.' ..... ..... ......... ............ ,'. .--.<:, i,l.j:~=R RE?;JUIREu :,:>i:~<:/:~:~<: :.:;:~: ~""":-:'."." '......~........'.................._'......_............ -- ....: ::~~:~:~~~: :~::: :~:': : ':~:~: i:~ :::':' : :': ::~:i:~::: : _: ~ ~:i~:::~: : _::: ~~ ::::;~; '. --;'. '. . . . . ,... ..... '~'..,' '...._~... '.' . ,....'. '..... .,"." .''- ..... '.'-'- ........ . . .~.'.- ........,. ,'....... '. '.......' .'. ,.... '." .'...-....... '~'.~.' . ._<.::~~=~: : : _: :::~::<: : : .: ::::;::~ : : :.: :::~:::::: : :.::: ::;:: :~:'_:".:. ~ . ~ -~-::~:.:~:~ t~~ ~~ ~~~: ~ -~:~:~ ~~~~~ ~:~. ~.~ :~ ~ ~~i~! ~~ ~~ r~.~ ~~ ~~~~j ~~~.~. ~ ': ;::: ::::~;;: :-; ~;.~..: _:::;: ::: :::::. :.:.:;: ::: '::::: :::~:::.:-:.:::::;;::. :::: :':~::: :::~: .........: .'.-. '.>'.>.. '-"';".:-.' , "<<,;.:.-... . '.-'<-: -.._.'..-.-,........-.....p........-.........I'..... . ;"':';:'~~::::_:.: ::::: : -:~::: :.: :::::~:': '::::~;-:: ~ :':-: ':.c:;,:,.:.; :.~:::_:.:,;~::: :::::)~:~~:,:;: :::.J ;. !:!D ,- "-J 2! ? >- :;: <..;. 2 ~ ~ I:... "I I i 2J, I r _...L ~~j ,.;.;-:1 i;~:fl :'~:H i I ~ R,~)::CJ'S RE-:JUIl=;EO J -11~C I 1:Y) 51:0::, !i;(;i! Elu:i ~~ r-r-..... ..."p.n:1.5.eH l'Q.T1.L, \IEHirlLES r:;:::F1 HC.urt Figure C-1-9 Guidelines for Right Turn Treatment (4-Lane Highway) 12~ 10<; :i: ,5 !l' :n ;'i:. ~-:, ll! ~ ~ s. f?:.:: :~:::.':~:::': .:::::'::: ::::; :;.~::::::::: ;~:': :.:. :-:~:'.., 1 '::: ': : -: o;..:~:,:.:~:.:,:. :.:': : : : : : : :: : : ('.:': ~: .:.:' :':" ,:;,: ~:::: ~:~;:;::::=.:~:; t:;::;~::.: ::~;';::::; :;:::: :~:: :::: ~:~ ::~:~: ;.'~~~-,- i:.:-:'.~:-:':':-:';':-:~-:':':':.:.:'>:';.:':';':.:':':;:::-::: :-:.~I;:'>:-'. : ~:: ~: ~::~ :~~3:::: :~3 ~ :~:: :.:P:'::: :':': ': '~':~: :~;:~: ;::~::: :::: :~:~:.:: :':.:.~ '. Co? L C :::. ~ t- ~ o c ~ Il. :m fi.B<:"JJ':S ;:;;CUIRED 211:< I E(C __,_1__.__...1_"".,_.___._ , I !:Ix. 12::C '14CC !.:JJ_i SOJ Pr.'i .t,r~?i':-:;I;:o:r::H TN~L, 'Io'EHICI,i:$ I'ffl HI)!;j1 C-6 DRAFT c. ~~_ LI February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT - - ~- ~~ w. .__ ~"'........... _~ Appendix D HeS Analysis I i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ) ) ) . h ., t t.. ~ ~ ~ " HSJvIM February 20, 2007 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis DRAFT . .....".. ~_........ -, - ,........~,.......... ._.~.. --= J ................ ~.. ~'R_ '"......'"'.H.~.. _~. ~.~". .U _ ~ i\ 1 ~ ~ ~ ., > ~"f ~ t. " " ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HSMM Design Year 2022 AM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions February 20, 2007 ~ r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ Two-Way Stop Control Page lof2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Genera/Information Site Information Analyst Intersection DH_GD 2022 Buildout AM Agency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 BuHdout Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Techn%gy Master Plan TlA EastJWest Street: Gfenmary Drive North/South Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 217 332 0 53 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 217 332 0 53 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Si~Jnal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 160 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 160 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and level of Service Approach NB S8 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 0 0 160 0 C (m) (vph) 1551 1017 504 vie 0.00 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 1.38 Control Delay 7.3 8.5 15.5 LOS A A C Approach Delay -- -- 15.5 Approach LOS -- -- C ~ Rights Reserved ;~ r> ~ Copyright @2003 University of Florida. AJl Rights Reserved Version 4.1f Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 HCS2000™ Version 4.lf ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ "" ~ ~ D\ f) ~ Two- Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO~WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information IAnalyst Intersection GO PO 2022 Buildout AM lAr:Jency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Buildout IAnalysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and T echnoloqv Master Plan TlA EasUWest Street: Gfenmary Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 :Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 326 0 0 153 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 6 326 0 0 153 0 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 2 ~ehicles, PH~ - -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R rJolume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 6 'veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 0 2 0 2 ~ehicles, P H~ Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, em (vph) 1428 893 vIe ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.1 tn./......n.(1-.++--..:......rT-,..,\rr____~_\ 1 '1'__1"'\1.1 A .L__~ "'!t"\A,,,,,^^'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ "" ';} ~ ~ ~ Two-Way Stop Control HCS2000™ A Copyright <0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved In / ,..".......n - -\ 1 _l_~_.\T -~.....10/r"')IIC-=:o.++;.,...,rrr"\rro.,..........r\.\' '2\.,.,'11,.1 A ~""'" Page 2 of 2 9.1 A Version 4.[[ 'J J'J (\ /') NY7 , ~ ~ ~ . ~ t ~ ~ ~ ) . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Two-Way Stop Control Pagelof2 TWO~WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information !.Analyst Intersection GO CC 2022 Buildout AM IAgency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 j.A,nalysis Year 2022 Buildout IAnalysis Time Period lAM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technoloqy Master Plan T/A East/West Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Corporate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 L T R L T R lVolume7veh/h) 100 226 0 0 47 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 100 226 0 0 47 0 I/veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 u'ehicles, PHV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 105 Peak-hour factor. PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 105 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 2 0 2 Ivehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delav, Queue Lenath, Level of Service IApproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 100 105 Capacity, cm (vph) 1560 1022 v/e ratio 0.06 0.10 Queue length (95%) 0.21 0.34 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 8.9 t \T _ 1("\11"'\r\01" ,,.,-. \ 1 "" \ 1"'\1,.... ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ . d -.,'5- Two- Way Stop Control HCS2000™ A Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved , "I r,,, - u ..101 """C; _"-"-~_ __I _1.. __1.__\ T ~~~ 101. ')()~",ff;n<rC'\ T"'TY"In\ l1.\,,'TI,,1' i-mn Page 2 of2 8.9 A Version 4.1f ') I') () /') nn7 Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis ~ .....__.. .n~..... ~.~ ':::1':": ,c ~ ~ 01.~ . __ ....L ~-'" ... .. .."....n"~ Design Year 2022 PM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions ~ ~ ~ 11.' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . l) ~ r. ~ ~ c; HSMM DRAFT _ "'~ -~ .,....,,~~~"'"'..~.e.u-o- r.&:""rS February 20, 2007 ~ Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO~WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General fnformation Site Information Analyst Intersection DH_GO 2022 Buildout PM Agency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Buildout Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technology Master Plan TIA EastlWest Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Dow Hol/ow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 [Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lVolume 0 80 206 0 210 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 80 206 0 210 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 315 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 315 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delav. Queue LenQth. and level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 0 0 315 0 C (m) (vph) 1358 1273 541 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.58 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 4.04 Control Delay 7.7 7.8 20.8 LOS A A C Approach Delay -- -- 20.8 Approach LOS -- -- C , 9 ~ '# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11. ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ t) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t.) & ~ ~ tl g) Rights Reserved ~ ~~ Copyright I!:i 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. Jf ^.I"^ _11\/.....l'\n --_\-'___1_~_'T -................10/......nQ......LL~__....\..,..........-...._\1')'hl")lpO "'---_ I") If") n. ''''''I n.ti~ ~ ~ ~ ) >. 1 ~ ~ ) ~ " ~ II v ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t} ~ Two-Way Stop Control HCS2000™ Version 4.1 f . n / I"'\r\ _~ ",,]0/ 1")f\C"I _..t....L":_ __\ _1_ _ _ ,___, T _ ~~ 10/1")['\('\ _.1.4-.:_.............\ ,.,..... 0............. 9"\..\ 1 '1\''lI'll....Q +--.-....... Page 2 of2 ')/')nnon7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h t ~ " ~ p ,. ,', ~l ~ , ~ Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information II..nalyst AKCB Intersection GO PD 2022 Bufldout PM II..gency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Bui/dout A.nalysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Techn%QV Master Plan TlA EastJWest Street: GJenmary Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume (veh/h) 6 199 0 0 308 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 6 199 0 0 308 0 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 2 :vehicles, PHV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 6 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configu ration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR olume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1253 732 vlc ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 10,0 Two-Way Stop Control HCS2000™ I I . I ~ , I ~ ~ ) :1 7 A Copyright Ii;! 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved \ 1'")\__<""\1_1 n , Page 2of2 A Version 4, 1 f ~ , II J 9 ~ ~ ;1 p ~ " ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f} ,. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ;;0. r;;J r"~ Y Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 0[2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ~nalvst Intersection GD CC 2022 Bui/dout PM fAgency/Co. HSMM lJurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 !Analysis Year 2022 Buildout ~nalysfs Time Period PM Peak Project Description Roe Co Center for Research and Techn%gy Master Plan T1A EastIWest Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Corporate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 121 77 0 0 224 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 121 77 0 0 224 0 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 vehicles, PHV .- n -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 85 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 85 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configu ration LR Control Delay, Queue length, level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 121 85 Capacity, cm (vph) 1345 816 vie ratio 0.09 0.10 Queue length (95%) 0.30 0.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 9.9 ..In ,'''''' (\ n _.L.L~ -- _ _\ _ 1_ _ _ 1_ __\ T _ ~ ~ 10/ "n (:1 .c:a.f+~T"I rTf""'\ 'T' QTY\~\ 1 '2 \,1 'llr 1 n f-............~ ') I') (\ /') (\ (\ '7 ~ , ~ if . ; ~ , b , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ " ~f iii W y " . Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 A 9.9 A HCS2000™ Copyright ibl2003 University ofFlonda, AJl Rights Reserved Version 4.1f r:, -. J /f'.\ T"\ - ____ ~~+nOI.. 0f'lru., rlO,( ") n~ ",t+;.,., fTC'\" h"n.1Tt'r\ Tn."", 10,( ")n~ ",tt;,.., fTC'\ Tpm... \ 11. \,,0l.-t f'l ;.......,~ ') /,)f'l 1'jf'lf'l'7 ':J :.. '(. ~) Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis ~ ~ "..._:_~.._...............uw.r"""'"""".",., -. ~ -~ - -......- ~r...._.n..._ ....- -.. - ~.~....... - "~J if' ~J ~ ~ " ~ } ; ) ; Design Year 2022 AM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions Without the Dow Hollow Road Connection ~ , :A y t~ " ,. ~l ~ ) h ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAFT M, .......r"~"'-'''.''''''~= ~~ HSMM February 20, 2007 ~ F ~ ''I Y ,. ~j j , ~ ~ " ~ t~ 1 t. ~ ,J , " .1 r:. J !\ .I !\ / 7 ~ / !l f . i , ~ J ~ ~ !. I ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ) ~ ~ ~ ~ Two- Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information IAnalyst IntersectiOn DH GO 2022 Buildout AM woDH !Agency/Co. HSMM ~urisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 IAnalysis Time Period AM Peak IAnalysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and TechnoloGV Master Plan T1A EastlWest Street: Glenmary Drive NorthlSouth Street: Dow Hollow Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period 7hrS): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 8 541 0 8 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 8 541 0 8 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R [Volume 205 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 205 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delav, Queue LenQth, and Level of Service !Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR !v (vph) 0 0 205 0 C (m) (vph) 1611 1017 644 !vIe 0.00 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 1.39 Control Delay 7.2 8.5 13.2 LOS A A B IApproach Delay -- -- 13.2 iApproach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved ,Ii/.....I"'\_ ..In/.......nn_.L...L~__ __\_L__'___\T ~............10/"""'f'\(l~.l--4-~___\rr______\1'")\......r")L" L-.-_ " Ir"\ n. Ir'l AFV...., ~ ~ ~ ~ tJ ; ~ I ~ l! .1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !A p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 11 Two-Way Stop Control HCS2000™ Version 4.1 f Copyright <1::J 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved .co, _.1/("\.\ n. _ ____ ~_..~o" ')()"nr10L ')flQ ",t+;n rTC'\"h""lrPT\ T ("\('!> 101,. ?O<;;:pttin ere;:\ Temn\13 \T1?k? tmn Page 2 of2 Version 4.1f ?.I?0/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page lof2 TWO~WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection GO PO 2022 Buildout AM IAnalyst woDH IAgency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 nalysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH IAnalysis Time Period AM Peak Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technology Master Plan TlA EasUWest Street: GJenmary Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 535 0 0 198 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 6 535 0 0 198 0 veh/h} Proportion of heavy 2 2 vehicles, P HV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 6 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Lenath, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1375 843 vIe ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 1f'\/r'"\f"\n \ 1 _ ~,_ _ \ T 1"1 1"'\ A" , "T" _ __ _ __ \ 1 ., \ ......., 1...... , Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.3 LOS A A Approach delay -- -- 9.3 s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- A HCS2000™ Copyright <<:J 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ b .Y ~ Ii .. ~ , rJ ~ ~ ~ ~ :f8 or ~ ~ ~ , ~ ." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection GD_CC 2022 Buildout AM Analyst woDH ~gency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 nalysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Analysis Time Period lAM Peak Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technology Master Plan TIA EastlWest Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Corporate Circle Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 158 377 0 0 79 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 158 377 0 0 79 0 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 vehicles, PHV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 119 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 119 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 158 119 Capacity, em (vph) 1519 981 vlc ratio 0.10 0.12 Queue length (95%) 0.35 0.41 r-. ~ - 1/("'1' r-.. ~ _n~~_ __ .._01 '"l (\~~...l0 I') (Ie' "'++;~ ~~\ ^ h.^^ ).,-0..\ T ^",., 10/_ ')() C' ot+;.., fT"'\ To.......... \ 11. \" '1L- ^ h-v-..., ') n(ll'~nn'7 Two- Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.2 LOS A A ~pproach delay -- -- 9.2 s/veh) ~pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000™ Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f - _ _\ ~_~____\ 1 -"')\.~""l1_ A L """"""'/"\1""'1"'\1"'\,., Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology Traffic Impact Analysis ~~ _. .....,~~-=-~~ ~'oW ~-.. ..........",. ...._.......~_.....~.~.r......,......'...... . '...,.~ .. .............. .~ _..........._~ =~ ~ Design Year 2022 PM Peak Hour Buildout Conditions Without the Dow Hollow Road Connection DRAFT _. .' , - ;:---~ HSMM February 20, 2007 Two- Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWOmWA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection OH_GO 2022 Buildout PM woDH Agency/Co. HSMM Jurisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 Analysis Year 2022 Buildout wo DH Conn IAnalysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and T eehnolooy Master Plan TlA EastIWest Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Dow Ho/low Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 8 278 0 8 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 8 278 0 8 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 517 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 517 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) -2 5 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len~th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movem ent 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR ~ (vph) 0 0 517 0 C (m) (vph) 1611 1273 797 ~/c 0.00 0.00 0.65 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 5.34 Control Delay 7.2 7.8 17.7 LOS A A C Approach Delay -- -- 17.7 !Approach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved 1fl, ...... f'\r1 " ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ 10 " ~ , ~ ~ / ~ j b .' ~ ~ 9 ~ II I h / ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , Two-Way Stop Control HCS2000™ Version 4.1f Copyright 10 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved _,,,-..______\ 1 "'urn_r ""'--u__ Page 2 of2 Version 4.1 f ') /" (\ I') (\/'0"" Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information -'~-~- Intersection GO_PO 2022 Buildoul PM Analyst woDH Agency/Co. HSMM ~urisdiction Roanoke County Date Performed 2/16/2007 I^ nalysis Year 2022 Buildout wo OH v.,nalysis Time Period PM Peak Conn Project Description Roa Co Center for Research and Technology Master Plan TlA EastlWest Street: Glenmary Drive North/South Street: Prunty Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 271 0 0 510 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Hourly Flow Rate 6 271 0 0 510 0 veh/h} Proportion of heavy 2 2 vehicles, PHV -- "- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 6 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 -6 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 6 Capacity, cm (vph) 1055 564 v/c ratio 0.01 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.03 \T _ _ln/.-,.nC'..............:_ _....\"'r.......___\ 1 ""u"11..1 C .....___ 1""\ ,,,^ 11"\^r;~ Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 11.5 LOS A B IApproach delay -- -- 11.5 s/veh) iApproach LOS -- -- B HCS2000™ Copyright tD 2003 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f ~ w f2 wo- ay Stop Contro Page 1 0 TWO.WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection GO_CC 2022 Bui/dout PM IAnalvst woDH /Agency/Co. HSMM Uurisdiction Roanoke County I Date Performed 2/16/2007 nalysis Year 2022 Bui/dout wo OH , !J\nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Conn Proiect Description Roa Co Center for Research and Techna/agv Master Plan TfA EastfWest Street: G/enmary Drive North/South Street: Camorate Circle rntersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 142 129 0 0 373 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 142 129 0 0 373 0 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 0 !vehicles, PHV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R tvolume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 0 137 Peak-hour factor. PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 0 0 137 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 2 0 2 vehicles, P HV Percent grade (%) 0 -2 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delav, Queue Lenath. Level of Service iApproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 142 137 Capacity, cm (vph) 1185 673 vlc ratio 012 0.20 Queue length (95%) 0.41 0.76 ... . - ~ ..... ,.............,.... , , , IT___1()/I''''\An .. ,..,., \ '1.-,., -"'1-'" - ,- ... ,- - - - Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of2 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 11.7 LOS A B Approach delay -- -- 11.7 s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000™ Copyright@ 2003 Uciven;ity of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f "., / "" n - ~,- __I - t. _ ~,. __I T ~~" 10/ ') ne 0++;.... "',,\ T".......,.., \ 11\" ,)1r P h-T'In ') n(\nOn7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2007 RESOLUTION 031307-2 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INITIATE AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND MASTER PLAN FOR THE PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT AT THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (CRT) WHEREAS, Section 30-14 of the Roanoke County Code and Section 15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia provide that whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires, an amendment to the zoning regulations or district maps may be initiated by resolution of the governing body; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff commenced an evaluation of the Master Plan and the conditions in order to monitor the effectiveness of these requirements as more extensive engineering and design had taken place and as businesses began to move into the Center for Research and Technology (CRT); and WHEREAS, County staff and the citizen design review team is recommending that the Board of Supervisors initiate by resolution the procedures to amend these covenants, conditions, and the Master Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the County Administrator, or his designee, be authorized to initiate an application to amend the covenants, conditions, and master plan for the Planned Technology District at the Center for Research and Technology. 2. That this application be submitted to the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation, which shall be forwarded to the governing body. 3. That the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice requires these amendments. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Wray, Church, Altizer, Flora, McNamara NAYS: None A ~Or:Y TESTE: . K,JJOJV ~. rfiJicbtnJ Diane S. Childers, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director, Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director, Planning 2 ,..-r", ,,/ "~,\ ~/~"".v;.l~l:~ ,/ ~""\ /' ~ - \.. " //" /./'~~ 1"1\, ,. " .,' t "".' ./ ~ ./ .J ,': ~ ~ .,/ .""..i .,/' vr:;..J I' ( '\'. /' "" (" ;.p (I ~ ." I) .' /\ \ ')~\ ",y ~ _ ~ ; J ,\ ,1'. ../~' ~~, ,,'C-;i ,~ 1~;) ,1' /,/ ~;\\l'" ~;~ ~ /fJj. /,-_.\~, .-' V ,,~ , ' ",r~ ;[0 (,,,/1- /' ,,<\ /../ /<" ij \. "j <"y~,.<,; <~"~ " r-7J." f,. '.; "_ '. ~<',.A "G\'--:X: <-A ../ 5 J" /\..;;,,,"1 " , ' ,,,f-'"o" .'. "" ,.., "\' r .... " ,. ,'," ,. .,y, ,/" ",'''' ' " ~~iI ~~~.a('." cr....s ' " /" .. I;;:~~~ ';~ {~. f;::<;rJ ,?,,<'/ :: s fPj;~'" ;1'; - K~ ".' (.:... .. \, ).. ", ~. ." ,,",. .'.,.<.. ' . \ .'" "".., ~ ./ Ii" ;,:i'>'. .. ' :=: ,.~- \ .; ,/ ,. >".~,,".,,"' hY ;"." ." "" '" '0" ,,"""'7",>2 . .j?' ~~ ,.:;,,~~, ,--.;;-;;00 'r__~/"'f..;r}/ ,,' r:~~::'" 0~ o/p i'\("f~ '}1:'';/ .J> * " ~.7- . r 0 Q'" .'U P" c'? /'. .1>0"; .' :.,..j;... f'r~ 'a> '.~ ><--~, J ,/ (,0' ,~ '/ \'" I". '\.l" g"J.f/" y.~;J.'"",:~ " /0 p" . y _ 0" ,.'f 0 '.P; ,7 . ',' , // , ... > ,..., ^ "."" d ~~'''!' ,.' ./-' .7 ",r'/" t.' t'l..,. i/l''I<'rA: 'Y'';j'" ;,,,..<.'l )\ ("):1 ."r/f / ",J~r;S~~_ \" /: ~:F l (I ~ ~ 0~;/:1'~f!i,w;~:' C/a/~i~'\~~")J' \ \, '. j&'Y' "d':' .,,, '. I, ': ,;, ,.~ I'~I:/-- ;! ' .; I ~ I.~\ ~ ,,,,,, f1. "1<-"''''' " I ,( .<;"J '. ,,,,,, ' i"': ~" \, \. ..' . ,;)'" .1// // .j'" "~ I ;! i' I ( '~ 'o/''' g'l! 5hr'h~;'\ ~Hoh'-'V >'i}~~lIA',:'I ~~\ '/ ~""",... """"", " ,,' ' ~ of ~""'f, 1:1' :::1 '" ,-..~,~/ ,,\ 'o.-". ..".... h ~c' ,."_,, ' .,',' " t' "~...)/~ .,\\ ~-~ \. , 'J" R",,",,"'f' ,'of.\ -- ," ,f. /\"" ~ ,..... \\, '(I, ,. . ~, ~K;j;:r' ",'" ," ~~ " ". , \ '..,'. . '0,," ....C\ .', - ",' \ ('w~ ' \\ ~''''-' .... .. ~,:~~" . >/ '. )" ". \' ., "J d .. .....'DW' ,,/.' .' /" \ , '\ \,..,) ........ ...<< / -" . . '\ . l, " .I _,....r, .." .:.... /'." .\ ~:;::;: ~ "Ii'. \V(" "./' ,'. 'I' ". "~' i M ~ <;\\; ,\ ,,'''' 15""9 1.".,~ ( '\ . ~)r ,'. ~ ~F ~' ~..~. .-::: ""... .'" ~,," ".. ~\,~'" ' ., ~''\~ ... t.. 0 " "C"?p\ i' "~._, ...\" \r.''\ \ -,," ~ p.,(/ ------ ,,'" -: ) "\" . ,-::Y ,,". . ' .." ' y,".' ... ' U .~ ._ ,." ' ;. ',. '-fY :,..... ~'t'~ " .., " .. ',y' .... ' ' " ," .." ... /., ",..,...---,,' a \.' , /' /' ..,t.'. ", ~ ">..r-J'\.~';;"Y /n'- /' H~)'-:>'::; , ..... f ~ ;...\/ '-. . /.'<~",~" "2'; ','\' ~. / . ,,'. ..~'., ".... ,.. t, ,I", j" '........ ! / ,'. y",,,, ../., \ /;:;-:<" . . ,~ ,_. ..'\.))/ "'0--':::// fJ~ ,<,,;.u/,;<.....r~... '( /g ,...._",>/ I' 'v" /.J /-;:~..~ J/ -"..~< ". ) ,( / ./ :E/ ~) j"J r;/ ~' / / ..D - / . " -, " ) " /' .. \..--/ ,/ lJ/~ (y~ // // ------/ _---- ../.J ~---- I ,/ j/ \ ! ~./ .r// /t' r-''-''//"{ Jl ( ) (/ /,)) \ I \. , \ \ , \ \ \ i \ I I ..-I ,..- ./- (C \' ?< >- -0- Z c)'.. 0 00 .-l ---..1 0 f-.O' Z -< ~. X f-<,....,. \ L>-I.......: U C) 2::.. w L>-I~ po. > .'0 ~ \ --c X' U 0::: -< w VJ w ~ 0::: o l..t.. 0::: ;z.< f-< \ \, z w U >-- i'-< Z :J o U w ~ o z -< o ~ \~:\ ".\ ( ,/\ J ( '-'. J/ ( ....... r 'I "'-,.--.//~J / ) ,) ( I " \ \ []I. ,--' 01"-- ? --' ;0 I / ' : ~o.! ,_-/ _ r~ /1" c o o ~ ,/' ,,/ ,,1 / ,- ,/ ...-- ---- ...-../;~:~ -----..-...... " o c " c 2 ~ ;; " . .~ c .~ , .: ." .-0 ~ e;"; _ c Z~ D\lI-' - '" i -,::.0 - I - -. 0\ "I - , - , <V\ o o ~) >< () o ..-1 o Z :t u r...; ~ o z <r; :t u ~ <r; LLl Vl LLl ~ ~ o J.:.. ~ LLl t-< Z LLl U >< t-< Z :J o U LLl ~ o z <r; o ~ .-< " ~ ::l '-' 0... <Ii U t::: 0 U <Ii .... ~ tIl <Ii j .:: .2 tIl .~ > ....... .ll ;:l Vl (J ~ '-' u 0 .... Z ~ 0... / " / J r,' ~ f~~ '" --; - ----:..... .."' ..' ..,~..~.- -,.'.." - "'" !' ~ -l I ,,", '" r:... C ,0 - 0' V') 0 c.... "'1"" ~ t ~ 0 ~ '^ '" C/) N ^ c o ~ >-< C) :>-.. 0 ~' ...-l 0 -< f-< Z :J 0 U w :.:4 0 Z -< 0 p:: \, " \ \\\ r- ;' X i: ,~~ 1I-. .,1"- , . =~~ =::~ -'l"f""\ ::> Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology Master Plan Update Summary This document was provided as a hard copy and not scanned. A copy is on file in the Clerk's Office for review. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2007 SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE 25.3 ACRES FROM R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TO PTD, PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT, AND TO AMEND THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND MASTER PLAN ON 454.25 ACRES ZONED PTD, PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT, AT THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY (CRT), LOCATED NEAR THE 5300 BLOCK OF GLENMARY DRIVE, UPON THE PETITION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ROANOKE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NOVOZYMES BIOLOGICALS, INC., AND TECTON PRODUCTS, LLC, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 2007, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 22,2007; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 25.3 acres and described as Tax Map Number 63.00-01-01, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of PTD, Planned Technology District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: The Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, dated 3-9-07. 4. That the petition of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Novozymes Biologicals, Inc. and Tecton Products, LLC to amend the covenants, conditions, and Master Plan on the 454.25 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology Development set out in detail in Exhibit A in Ordinance No. 042799-10, be, and hereby is approved; and 5. That the owners of the 454.25 acres of property described as Tax Map No. 54.00-01-2.00 containing 404.31 acres; Tax Map No. 64.01-05-02 containing 13 acres; Tax Map No. 64.01-05-01 containing 16.94 acres; and Tax Map No. 54.00-01-02.01 containing 20 acres have voluntarily proffered in writing the following AMENDED conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: The Development Guidelines and Protective Covenants, Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, dated 3-9-07. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 0-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 22,2007 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance to increase the salaries of the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 15.2-1414.3 of the Code of Virginia SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In June 2006, the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-1414.3 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. This section of the State Code and Section 3.07 of the County Charter require that any increase in Supervisors' salaries be accomplished by ordinance after public hearing between May 1 and June 30. Any increase is limited to an annual five (5%) percent inflation factor. The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on May 8, 2007; the second reading and public hearing is scheduled for May 22,2007. The current salary for Board members is $15,408.64. There is an additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at $1,800 and for the Vice-Chairman at $1,200. This ordinance increases salaries by 3.5%. FISCAL IMPACT: A 3.5% increase would cost $2,696.50 ($539.30 each). The new salary for each Board member would be $15,947.94. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 22,2007 ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 15.2-1414.3 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-1414.3 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members at $15,40a.64 by Ordinance 062706-10 and further has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman for the Board to be $1 ,aoo and for the vice-chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on Maya, 2007; the second reading and public hearing was held on May 22,2007. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of 3.5% pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 15.2-1414.3 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $15,947.94 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice-chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 2007.