Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/11/2008 - Regular/OAN~ /~ z -o 1838 r I Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda November 11, 2008 NOTE: A meeting of the Audit Committee has been scheduled for 1:30 p.m. in the Board Conference Room, Fourth Floor, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA 24018 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for November 11, 2008. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Our meetings are now closed-captioned, so it is important that anyone addressing the Board speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Pastor Marshall Allen West Salem Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD T0, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AVIIARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a resolution granting a waiver under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13: Offenses -Miscellaneous of the Roanoke County Code, Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC. (Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator) 2. Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $45,000 from the State Wireless Board for a citizens alerting system. (Elaine Carver, Chief Information Officer) 3. Presentation of results of operations for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, and appropriation of $250,000 from the City of Salem for renovations to the existing jail. (Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance) 4. Request to adopt a resolution approving the sale of the Southview school property by the Roanoke County School Board. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading on an ordinance upon the petition of Edward Rose Properties, Inc. to rezone approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions and C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions and to rezone approximately 11.2 acres from C-2, General Commercial District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing a mixed-use development consisting of an apartment complex and commercial uses located at the 6200 and 6300 blocks of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 15-foot drainage easement recorded by deed of easement, Instrument #200400160, dedicated by Charles R. Simpson, Inc. and Greystoke Partnership, now crossing lots 19, 20 and 21 of Edgefield, Section 2, Subdivision and Matthew Drive, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 2 H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Library Board (appointed by district) 2. Roanoke County Planning Commission (appointed by district) 3. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by district) 4. Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Resolution establishing a meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for calendar year 2009 2. Request from the schools to accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of $25,000 from the Jobs for Virginia Graduates Program to provide job readiness training and workplace skills training J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Accounts Paid -October 2008 5. Statement of the treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of October 31, 2008 6. Telecommunications Tax Comparison Report 3 N. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (3) to discuss or consider the acquisition of real property for a variety of public purposes; and Section 2.2-3711.A.1. consideration of prospective candidates for employment and the appointment of specific public officers, namely Clerk to the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator. Note: The Board shall interview candidates for the position of County Administrator at one or more undisclosed locations within the next 15 days, as provided in Sections 2.2-3711.A.1 and 2.2-3712.8. O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Five-year staffing plan for Fire and Rescue Department. (requested by Supervisor Altizer; Richard Burch, Chief of Fire and Rescue) 2. Changes to the Emergency Operation Plan. (Richard Burch, Chief of Fire and Rescue) 3. Development of the Hollins Area Community Plan. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning; David Holladay, Planner III; and Megan Cronise, Planner II) EVENING SESSION P. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION Q. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt the revised Emergency Operation Plan. (Richard Burch, Chief of Fire and Rescue) R PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 1. Public hearing and adoption of resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Hollins Area Plan. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. (Withdrawn at the request of the petitioner.) Second reading of an ordinance upon the petition of Theodore J. Foster to obtain a Special Use Permit in an R-1, Low Density Residential District, for the purpose of constructing a private stable on 5.801 acres located at 4535 Red Barn Lane, Vinton Magisterial District. 4 2. Second reading of an ordinance upon the petition of American Electric Power to rezone 13.103 acres from C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, to I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing a construction yard located at the 1800 block of Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 3. Second reading of an ordinance upon the petition of Faith Fellowship Church to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, General Commercial District, for the purpose of Religious Assembly on 1.0 acre located at 4108 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 4. Second reading of an ordinance upon the petition of James R. Cherney to rezone approximately 4.75 acres from R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions, to C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing an office building located between the 2300 block and 2400 block of Electric Road and 2315 Bridle Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 5. Second reading of an ordinance upon the petition of JJDR Company, LLC to rezone 1.13 acres from a C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, to a C-2, General Commercial District for the purpose of conducting personal improvement services located at 1919 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 6. Second reading of an ordinance amending Section 30-22-1, Civil Penalties, and Section 30-91-2, General Regulations for Parking, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning; Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 2. Michael W. Altizer 3. Joseph P. McNamara 4. Charlotte A. Moore 5. Richard C. Flora V. ADJOURNMENT 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- -- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt Secl:ion 13-23 of provisions of the Noise of Chapter Roanoke County Partners, LLC ~ resolution granting a waiver under the Roanoke County Code to the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. 13: Offenses -Miscellaneous of the Code, Firstchoice Public Private SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: John M. Chambliss ,, , e County Administrator ~~; ~~ ~~~;~,;_F~,! ~~~ ' ~'~ ~ `" - i ~~/ r ~ ~c `, ! •. I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ '~~) , ~~.---~.'~ .~.... SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC is requesting a waiver to the County's noise ordinance for approximately six concrete slab pours at the site of 'the multi-generational recreation center on Woodhaven Road near Valleypointe Parkway. This work must begin at night as each slab should be poured continuously to ensure the quality of the concrete. Each pour will begin at approximately midnight and be completed the following work day, so there will be one night of noise per pour. In the attached letter submitted by English Construction, one of the partner firms that comprise Firstchoice, the dates requested for the waiver are from December 2008 until March 2009. Howver, in order to provide flexibility for possible weather-related issues, the dates listed in the proposed ordinance are from December 1, 2008, until May 1, 2009. Representatives of English Construction will be in attendance to answer any questions that the Board may have. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended khat the Board adopt the attached resolution granting this waiver. _ --1 .----- - c. ---m_~.._~~_~__..__~ :..._~: __ _.._..._ ..___.___ _._. - - __ _-. _ _- - _1 ___ __ .IW WNIX p1Ytl 615 CHURCH STREET, LYNCIBURG, VIRGINIA 24504 P.O. Box P - 7000, LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA ?_4505 (434) Q45 - 0301 (434) 1345 - 0306 FAx October 2t1, _'UI)i1 Mr. UEtll C)~UOllllelf County of Roanoke, V~\ PO [3u~ 295(lU Roanoke. Vii 2=4015-0795 Kc: Roanoke Recreation Ccnt~r Noise Ordinance Waiver llear Dan: "This retluest for a noise ordinance waiver for work being clone un the Roanoke Recreation Center is needed for roltsh'urtion slab pours and possible work ur tlcliverirs ii'om other trades. An outline of the rctluested information for this waiver is as follu~~-s: - Possible time frame for this work would he from December ?f1U5 thru A~larch 2t)fl9 (exact dales will L)c issued 1-? wcr.ks prior to the pour). - S]ab pours will start 8pp1'C1XInliitCl}~ 1?:0l) ant thru the normal working Iwurs the next da}' (there will be approximately (i scheduled pours ~~~hich will be for (i total days}. - The purpose of this waiver would mainly he Cur the slab pours. The need to start early is critical in order to finish the concrete and protect it from freeing the following evenin~~. - 1111 vehicles traveling to the job site with materials. etc. will be coming from Peters Creek Road to Woad Haven Road via Valley Pointe Parkway. - X111 vehicles will be entering the job site front the conshuction entrance, which is a new private road ~nh-an~e at the south encl of the project site off of Wood Haven Road. - Needed light ]]ants will he turned un 3O minutes prior to pump trucks arriving: on site and the pump trucks arc scheduled 3t) minutes prior to the concrete U•ucks. If you have any questions or need any I"urlher information please contact ntr. E:NGLISti CONS"1'RUCT'IUN COIVIP~~NY, Inc. ~~~~~ l3il] 1Viscnuut I'r<)jccl Superinlcndcnl I3J W/cch' ec: Fife eJ'lBO.(.'~'~ ~~)(I9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN-fER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER UNDER SECTION 13-23 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY'S NOISE ORDINANCE, ARTICLE II. NOISEOF CHAPTER 13: OFFENSES- MISCELLANEOUS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, FIRSTCHOICE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERS, LLC. WHEREAS, Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC,'the con~tractorforthe Roanoke County multigenerational recreation center, for the purposes of performing necessary concrete pours, has requested a waiver of the County's noise ordinance as contemplated under Sec. 13-23. Undue hardship waiver. to permit this concrete work beginning on December 1, 2008, and ending May 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code establishes certain standards for the Board of Supervisors to grant waivers from the provision of the Roanoke County Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13: Offenses - Miscellaneous to avoid undue hardship upon consideration of certain factors set forth in subsection (b) of Sec. 13- 23 and after making certain alternative Findings. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. In making its determination as to whether to grant the requested waiver to the Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC from the County's noise ordinance, the Board of Supervisors has considered the following factors: a. The time of day the noise will occur and the duration of the noise: Beginning at approximately 12:00 a.m. on December 1, 2008, and ending 5:00 p.m. on May 1, 2009. b. Whether the noise is intermittent or continuous: The noise produced during the process of pouring concrete at the multi-generational recreation center, located at the intersection of Woodhaven Road and Valleypointe Parkway, will be intermittent and will occur in approximately six pours, each of which will begin at approximately midnight and continue through the end of following work day. c. The extensiveness of the noise: Each pour will only require one night for the night portion of the work. There will be approximately six nights of noise during the waiver period. Noise will be produced by concrete trucks, generators, and other necessary ancillary equipment. d. The technical and economic feasibility of bringing the noise into conformance with the noise ordinance: This work has to be initiated at night due to the fact that 'the concrete must be poured continuously to ensure the quality of the concrete slabs, therefore it is not technically feasible to conform with the noise ordinance. e. Other matters related to the impact of the noise on the health, safety, and welfare of 'the community and khe degree of hardship resulting from enforcement of the ordinance: The truck traffic will come through Valleypointe Parkway and turn left onto Woodhaven Road. By using this traffic pattern, only two inhabited houses will be in the area impacted by the work or kraffic noise. f. The extent to which the noise is necessary and incidental to the commercial and industrial use generating the sound: The noise to be generated by the 2 work is limited to one night for each of six planned pours. It consists of concrete trucks and generators necessary to complete the work. This work is necessary for the completion of the multi-generational recreation center. Not granting the waiver would result in the contractor being unable to complete the project in accordance with the project schedule, thereby suffering substantial penalties for non-compliance with the Comprehensive Agreement. Furthermore, denying the waiver request would cause the facility opening to be delayed to the detriment of the community. 2. The Board of Supervisors makes the following finding: Compliance with the provisions of the County's noise ordinance concerning the specific act of noise disturbance by construction machinery or operations under subsection (1) of Sec. 13-21. Specific acts as noise disturbance. or under the provision of Sec. 13-20. Genera! prohibition. would produce serious economic hardship for Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC, without producing any substantial benefit to the public. 3. That the provisions of Sec.13-21. Specific acts as noise, subsection (1) and Sec. 13-20. General prohibition. of Article II. NOISE of Chapter 13. OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS be WAIVED for a period from December 1, 2008, until May 1, 2009. 4. This Waiver is granted specifically to Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC, its officers, employees, and agents for construction work and related activities at the multi-generational recreation center construction site in Roanoke County, Virginia, for work performed between December 1, 2008, and May 1, 2009, for six non- 3 consecutive days, each beginning at approximately rriidnight and ending the following business day. The County Administrator shall be notified of the specific nights of the work by Firstchoice no less than one week prior to each night that night work will be occurring. 5. That this Waiver may only be extended upon written application and approval by the Board of Supervisors. 6. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from its passage. 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 11, 2008 Request to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $45,000 for a citizen alerting system. Elaine Carver Chief Information OfFicer John M. Chambliss County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: " r ~~,~ ~ ~ ~€ _~/~ i `' i ~' ~; ~= ~ . ` ,~~1 In August, Roanoke County's Emergency Corrimunications Center joined forces with the Fire and Rescue, Police, and Information Technology Departments to submit a grant application to the State Wireless Board for a citizen alerting system, also referred to as reverse 911. In the past few years, several incidents in Roanoke County have warranted evacuations and searches, i.e., ~khe Greenridge Mountain fire and the tractor ~krailer fire on I-81. After- action critiques of these incidents have demonstrated that excessive field personnel hours are being used to make citizen notifications, hours which could be refocused on handling the emergency. By implementing a citizen's alerting system, citizens could be notified in the method or methods they choose, be it cell phone, text message, email, land line call, etc. automa~lically. Strengthening communications capabilities within local communities is Number 5 on the national priorities list included in the Virginia State Preparedness Report. The Virginia State Homeland Security Strategy emphasizes the need to ensure the safety of the citizens of the Commonwealth. A citizen alerting system would not only bring Roanoke County into alignment with the goals set forth by the Commonwealth, but brings our citizen services in line with surrounding localities that are using or in the processing of purchasing this technology including the cities of Roanoke and Salem and Franklin, Montgomery, and Botetourt Counties. We will use this funding to purchase the necessary software and services to implement the system. The requested funds will cover the initial expenses and early ongoing costs of this project. At the end of the grant period, we will incorporate system maintenance funding into the operating budget of the Emergency Communication Center. FISCAL IMPACT: No matching funds will be required and annual maintenance costs of $20,000, will be incorporated into the operating budget of ~khe Emergency Communication Center. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Accept and appropriate the grant funds of $45,000 to the Emergency Communication Center budget. 2) Do not accept the grant funds of $45,000. STAFF RECOMMENDAI"ION: Staff recommends Alternative 1, accept and appropriate the grant in the amount of $45,000 to the Emergency Communication Center budget. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA"PION CENTER MEET"ING DATE: Noverriber 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of results of operations for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, and appropriation of $250,000 from the City of Salem for renovations to the existing jail SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ~~~ r.Y', ~~ ~, _ ~ ~~~ ~ .L ~ ~ ,. .~ "^ ~ L ~, ~e _` ,r KPMG LLP completed their audit of the Financial operations of'the County of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke Public Schools for the year ended June 30, 2008. The Audit Committee met this afternoon to review the results of the year's operations and the management letter comments from the auditors. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will be distributed to the Board of Supervisors as soon as it is received from the printer in December 2008. The fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, was favorable for both the County and the Schools. Below is the detailed information for both the County and Schools regarding the results of operations for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008: Results of Operations of the County of Roanoke for the Year Ended June 30, 2008: Revenues of the County of Roanoke for the Year Ended June 30. 2 The County operations for the year ended June 30, 2008, resulted in general fund revenues $2,306,609 over budget, however expenditures in the amount of $1,150,000 were approved during the 2008-2009 budget and $250,000 was collected from Salem which will need to be appropriated for existing jail renovations, leaving a balance of $906,609 as shown on Attachment I. The additional revenues collected were primarily from investment income and increased tax collections in the areas of real estate, meals tax, and hotel/motel tax. A detailed analysis of the general fi.and revenues is outlined in Attachment II. Prior to fiscal year (FY) 2005-2006, the School Board and Board of Supervisors adopted a joint funding policy to provide for a sustainable funding stream for school and county capital improvements in future years. The policies for use of general fund revenues and expenditures in excess of budget at year end designates portions of year-end balance for major and minor capital projects as well as to the general fund unappropriated balance. Based upon these policies, staff recommends the $906,609 to be added to the general fund unappropriated balance. This will increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance from $16,743,199 to $17,649,808 at June 30, 2008, wriich is 9.38% of the 2008-2009 General Fund Revenues as shown on Attachment III. The policy range for 2008-2009 was 9%-10%. In previous years, we have been able to add enough to the Unappropriated balance to reach the top of'the range. No action is required from the Board for these funds to close to the unappropriated balance. Expenditures of the County of Roanoke for the Year Ended June 30, 2008: Departmental expenditure savings amounted to $539,814 as shown on Attachment IV. Based upon the policy for use of unspent expenditure appropriations at year end, departments are able to request up to 60% of the savings witl-iin their own department for special purchases and programs approved by the County Administrator and the remaining reverts to the Minor County Capital Reserve for future projects. Based upon this policy, staff recommends the following appropriations: • $241,324 to be appropriated to departments for rollovers. • $298,490 to be appropriated to the Minor County Capital Reserve. Attachment V is a five year si.ammary of County and Schools revenue and expenditure savings. Results of Operations of the Roanoke County Public Schools for the Year Ended June 30, 2008: Attachment VI is the report for the School Operations year end for June 30, 2008. The School Board will take action to approve this report at the November 13, 2008, meeting. The Schools ended the year with a surplus of $5.3 rriillion. No action is required by the County Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Board has previously approved either by policy or board action the above items noted and the only action required by the Board is to appropriate $250,000 from the City of Salem for renovations to the existing jail. County of Roanoke, Virginia Summary of General Operating Fund Revenues For the Year Ended June 30, 20t}8 Revenues and transfers Use of revenue collections above budget: Salem's share of existing Jall renovations Balance 2008-2009 Budget Subtotal of excess revenue available Addition to Genera[ Fund Unappropriated Bafancs Excess revenue available for major capital Budgeted Revenues Attachment 1 Actual Revenues Amount $ 164,291,419 $ 166,598,028 $ 2,300,609 250,000 1 150,000 906,609 906,609 $ - page 4 c N M O O ILl V~ fD O W IA O h' N lt7 N~~ tND n 0 T O N r ~ ~ ~ j N 070>4~tD0 t4 fO V-I~rtO~OMMtOMtONM i ~ i U ~ U YT i t l7 T~1S O ~ 2F3 op l°~tr70 C r t~ [•7N 1I7 t ( 6 NN~NCU aO N Nlhrl[7 Q7C~CO~rlir (33 'a C-619 N r ~'' - R I+Y ~i 1+} z ` _ t9 fA v V) V) N U) V] V) N U9 r V) [ ) N . fR t0 d3 ~ fA ~ N ..i v t7 "' M U) V) V) ~..' V) O6 r pp r ~ 3 n d ~ ~ ~ ooooooQOO oooocinoooc+l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r_ m r. m y C Q 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u7 0 O~ 0 ' 0 7 ;; 61 bU?t()O~C? Nlrio 0(70(0 OiONUi O N} M CC1~ ~ r.~OtDO nl~~ CPr NNO~~Mr W ~rC7 N rN `-~ v) V ~ V ~ Q. ~ = ~ 9 a tnt~rnt~t»t~+»v~t~«nv,v~tntst~ust»t»eaa~~r ~r a~ cMc~ a7 F+wN ~TM-"dfDO~fgq~f77~~CC~ttO t~O 1(~tDO M N ~ N N ~ 0 ry7 t? O O O. -. 67 ~~ it~t i.( Qi t7 D4 Df 4_~h~~NatDM~ tD~M ~ D t O O ~ ~' ~ rm67 In to Q/NOWMN(A V Qi CVOr M W (~ee}}tOM t7 CO ~~N MM•t 6)~MON t0 O lD O O O t0 to to O O_~ ~ ~~ ^ (~rv r '-=N r N`-'tC)Nr~tD~ M M r N 0 C O ~ N ~ ~ FA ~ ~ M 0 0 0 o O S S S 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0~ ~ W H O N 4m ~ _ 000000 0000 00 O 001fy r .--1170 i} i O7 d ~ ouicvootauioooouiocdair:td~rit»Iritri 0NM0 N r.0p OrnM OM OOrtb [41~ o tD 6 t~l ~ m ~ ° a InNr0t7 N COV O)r~hMtonnoocor U7r h 1!] N ao ri = +i o i~t N v a n rr . ~Nc r r ~ ~ m a m LL r r Q t,~t~t~t~t~t~t~t~t~t~u.~-~~~~~,t„t~t~~ ~ ~ z~ } (D O)M NN?p nMVWOln~tp CryV td0r ~MOO~It7MMOMtn tnMNt~7Nt0 47 W m N 07 to W N a ..J to V °? V M tr tD IT) 77_ N r r IA O Ch c0 tY V 1t7 C7 (D O O7 4 Q O DO rUjr 00 tON~~(O CONnN6~C••CO 00tf lnMM t ~ ~ h O 00 f n0 ~a O [7 WQ~r~-OT '11~MOY 10647 (D~nt[iMQ7 r MrM V t t0 O M to Of V1 Q ~ N 3 N o ~° odoNMOOfndln rr ti rr rN ttOU tmo Q uJ raY r r p ~ LLL l z 0 W N tntncnUrtfrtsrtntntrrtnt»rnent»t»t»vrvsv~t»t» +n en ~ ,_ . p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 ,-.: +-' 00 N OL7 M N n ~ 6> O/ 1~ n 0 [O In N V 0 4"f (D tO tO m N ~h~ ;~ (y r-N vOrlfi W rNt~)MOMIh ~O6>~ +-'tLJ ' N h ' ' M N M r ~ [~l tt ,d. O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e t4 +' h to '~Y 67 tAN06~4?MOtDrM44NON47nM ~ ~~~ o t`N~mNt7 .N-.N-~t~)4)07NMO~tO WOY MM ~ t0 Q7 O O O O O O O D O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O o 0 D C M r q: ~-- M O B t0 r op n t9 tb M W M n r 0 N r- tt 0- to o~ a•~ r-lnQtl)QOMtfl V OiO~MNf~~ai to cA to to r l a- r i i h ~ ro m r .. } ~~ O o o aY 'o°- o o~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ a 0 0 0 0 0 w W V OI tf7NNO ~Mt6 tb fNtA Q767rrOO NM N ..~ ~° ~ f0 [O ~ (+} lV D In O N m (O 'ch M n N n M aQ rn n~ n r ' v N ~ N c O ; '~ O U X t4 O ~ ~ O c ~ ~ ~ ryry m a yy(( tt}}~~ ~ fi3 f- N ~ 4 N N v ~ L °1 ~ C ~ , ~ a ~d w ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ °1 li x ~ ~ t c i ,,~ ~~ H O ~F;; ~U N~y~ ~ y ~ Q } l}J d x ~~' ~Nm c ~~x °'aC~Nm~NC~ cd ~ tV ~ ` " y s Vl N ~ U ~ N t y, N O 41 O C ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ U C N ~ (77 j V V 7 O ~ IC ~ ~ N ~ t t~ d t5 LL O `~ d ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ (n O C ^, ° ~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~ 4S il.. ~F-J~ 16 . N ~ ~ ° 7 cO.N{J £ LL ~ d (.~ O li N d to d c a ~ N LI! E~i ?w m ~v~N ~ ~~'w~° ~ k4 °~ ~ ~ y e ~ L _ c ° ca d t~ ~ ~ ) es - Od1L0C}c~~ mm~KT ~d~~~!- ~ ~ F - d to C7 ~ }-. N N [A a dl G Qf E Q O rO Ll.. F O Z v n Attachment Ill GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Audited balance at June 30, 2008 $ 16,743,199 Addition for 2007-08 Operations 906,609 Balance at November 11, 2008 $ 17,649,808 % of General Fund Revenue 9.51 9.38% ** Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years. * 200708 a range of 8.5%-9.5% of General Fund Revenues 2007-2008 General Fund Revenues $176,033,678 8.5% of General Fund Revenues $14,962,863 9,5% of General Fund Revenues $16,723,199 *~ 2008-09 a range of 9.0%-10.0% of General Fund Revenues 2048-2009 General Fund Revenues $188,178,858 9.0% of General Fund Revenues $16,936,097 10.0% of General Fund Revenues $18,817,886 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 9.38% which is within the rang for 2008-09. The balance wilt be increased over time to the follovring ranges: 2009-2010 9.5%-10,5% 2010-2011 10.0%-11.0% S~.ibmitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved 8y John M. Chambliss, Jr. Page 6 County Administrator County of Roanoke, Virginia Summary of General Operating Fund Expenditures For the Year Ended June 30, 2008 Attachment IV Budgotod Actual Expenditures Expenditures Amount Expenditures, encumbrances, and transfers $ 169,912,872 $ 169,373,068 $ 539,814 Uss of expenditure savings: Less: Approved based on poiicy: Departmental rollover per policy 241,324 Expenditure savings available for minor capital $ 298,490 pogo 7 C N v m Q N C ~' 41 K ~ W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~+ } G ~ ~ ~ O yU L], L H- E E O O N ti O O N ra 0 N Q O N v 0 d N ~ ~ M O r N ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ O M ~ M ~ 00 N IN loll rn~~ c~o~ ~ ~ M .- rnr l() CD Id9 (fl ~ N (p o0 If? ~ ~ N ~'i ~ (~ I`~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~^i ~'~~ r r C> `~ I"~ll Ll j ~ N rn ~ u~ ri v rn n rnr~ M r tf~ l~'Il to C ~ ro C ~ m a7i ~ ~ ~ ~=oJ =a ~~ ~~o V r N M rn t• CD (`~ (D Q V C~7 00 M tC) 00 r r N r~'in 6g I`~11 MoM CO O CO <- r N ~ ~ M M Cp `~ III tl0 O CO ~ ~ ~ ai M N acrv00 ri c~i ep (n 1691 ~Nt~D M N ~ OHO l~ M NN~f? 69 1`~ CO (O V' ~~~ tU (T) O ocoti r~ rn m r r M ~' I'~II J U N N ~ ~ ? ~ ~ C ~ as ~ ~ ~ J a ~. ~ ~~o rn m 4. Attachment VI AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MEETING DATE: November 13, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: RequestforAppropriation ofFinalYear-End 13alancefrom School Operations for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 BACKGROUND: The FY2007-08 budget was prepared using significant increases in anticipated growth in state aid of 5.7%. As noted on Attachment A, actua# revenues exceeded budgeted revenues by $1,1 million (less than 1% of budget). The excess revenues primarily consisted of basic aid impacted by growth in student enrollment. Sales tax collections in FY07-OS were actually lower than the prior year and below budget by $529,230. Although there was some enrollment growth in FY2007-08, the rate of growth over the past two years is showing signs of leveling off. The March 31, 2008 actual enrollment of 14,802 was 202 students higher than budgeted (14,600) and 25 students more than the prior year enrollment. The current year budget was purposely built on an ADM of 14,600 based on the enrollment trends and enrollment as of September 30, 2008 was at 14,742 as compared to 14,931 in September 2007. As predicted in this report East year, this enrollment trend will result in rower revenue surpluses as enrollment stabilizes and the budgeted enrollment catches up with the past growth. With aver 50°!0 of the budget dependent upon state aid, it is critical that the enrollment projections are attainable and flexible enough to address state shortfaEls like the sales tax this past year as well as the current economic crisis playing out in Richmond and across the nation. See Attachment B for a historical comparison of student enrollment. The school departments stayed within #heir approved budgets with under-expenditures in the major spending categories accounting far $4.1 million, net of the emergency fund, or 3.1 % of the year-end balance (Attachment A). Under-expenditures were attributable primarilyto savings in the personnel budget ($2.6 million. Other savings resulted from unspent contingency funds, insurance savings, and cautious spending. The budget ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 27, 2008 stated "that alt school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 2007-08 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Fund in fiscal year 20D8-09 as follows: a) Two-thirds of the year end balance in the school operating fund will he allocated to the Major School Capital Resen~e, b) One-third of the year end balance in the school operating fund, not to exceed $1,000,000, will be allocated to the Minor School Capital Reserve, c} If the one-third allocation to the Minor School Capital Reserve exceeds $1,000,000, the excess will be added to the Major School Capital Reserve." SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During 2005, the School Board and Board of Supervisors adopted a joint funding policy to provide for a sustainab#e funding stream for school and county capital improvements in future years. The Year End Balance and School Capital Reserve policies designate portions of the year-end balance far major and minor capital projects as noted above in the county budget ordinance. Based on the adopted policies, staff is recommending the following appropriations per Attachment C: C:\Y)OCIJA7F.-t\r°H•ens\LOCe1LS~1\Temp\'KPgr~ti~7se\tt-t3-o8 YR.doc Minor Capital Funds • $1,000,000 allocated to Minor Capital Reserve for projects to be approved by the School Board at a later date based on evaluation of existing needs and priorities. Major Capital Funds • $4,021,716 allocated to Major Capital Reserve in the approved School Capital Improvement Plan. School Operating Fund Unappropriated Balance (Emergency Reserve) • The School Board allocated funds from 2005 to establish a reserve of $1,300,000 for financial emergencies due to unexpected revenue shortfalls or unplanned significant expenditure increases. This reserve is intended to protect the school system from the need for amid-year reduction in staff or service levels as the result of an unanticipated financial draw on school resources. The reserve was increased by the School Board in 2007 to a balance of $2,000,000 and has not been tapped into during FY2007-08. The Board of Supervisors approved the creation and operation of this reserve. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of the 2007-08 year-end balance of $1,000,000 to Minor Capital Reserve, $4,021,716 to Major Capital Reserve, $266,347 to outstanding encumbrances rolled over to FY2008-09, and the retention of the $2,000,000 Emergency Reserve rolled over to FY2008-09. C: \fibCUME~i\m~rens\LUCALS~ x\Tem g\Y Pg,-~«~ise\7 i-~3-o8 YC.doc 10 Attachment A Roanoke County Schoais Year-End Balance for ~Y 2007-08 Aud+tsd Budget 2007-08 Year to Date Actuals Dollar Difference Percentage of Budget Revenues: Sales Tax 14,872,000 14,342,77D (529,230) 96.44% Stateftevenue 56,562,556 57,763,714 1,2D1,158 102.12% Federal Revenue 197,681 378,152 180,471 191.29% Tuition, Rent & Interest 627,823 909,815 281,992 144.92% Transfer from County 52,868,113 62,868,113 0 100.00% Transfer from CPMT 1,849,000 1,849,000 0 100.00% Beginning Balance 8,292,833 8,292,833 0 100,00% Totall2evenue 145,270,006 146,404,397 1,134,391 100.78% Expenditures: 70 School Board 317,015 285,875 31,140 90.18% 71 School Superintendent 143,762 86,556 57,206 60.21% 72 Budget & Finance 16,441,001 16,096,359 344,642 97.90% 73 Instructional Personnel 82,Od?.,642 80,442,455 1,600,186 98.05% 74 Transportation 1 ,889,451 1,662,246 227,205 87.98% 75 Facilities & Operations 4,680,964 4,362,883 318,081 93,20°f° 76 Administrative Personnel 9,833,578 9,195,966 637,512 93.52% 77 Summer School 382,669 311,043 71,625 81.28% 78 Community Relations 53,800 52,148 1,652 96.93% 79 Instruction 900,925 796,904 1 D4,021 88.45% 80 Deputy Superintendent 1,301,363 1,174,816 126,547 90.28% 81 Remediation & Testing 449,266 360,796 88,470 80.31% 82 Career & Technical Education 400,390 399,999 391 99.90% 83 Pupil Personnel Services 594,958 593,849 1,119 99.81°!0 85 Staff Dovefapment 420,273 408,185 12,088 97.12% 86 Guidanco 383,851 382,727 1,134 99.70% 87 Media Servicos 1,954,866 1,845,550 109,315 94.41% 88 PupllAssignment 191,934 181,727 10,207 94.68% 89 Classified Personnel 20,815,701 20,432,502 383,199 98.16% 90 Adult Education 71,577 43,747 27,830 61.12% Less: Confingency per policy 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 145,270,006 139,116,334 6,153,672 95.76% Revenu es In Excess of Expenditures 7,288,063 2,620,997 Farsonnei onFy .'-. Reserved for Emergencies (2,000,000) 5,288,063 Budget Rollovers: Outstanding PO`s Sea rpt 7060 (186,683) PO - WBM carpet 752000-6070 (19,800) PQ -Science Museum 792020-3060 (15,000) Bd member office renovation 752040.6470 (2,983) Bd member furniture 751000-8201 (2,052) Band Uniform rollover 792030-6324 (20,000) Art Museum rollover 793540-6326 (19,829) (now acct) Balance fo be allocated to MajorlMinor Reserves 5,021,716 page 11 Attachment R A~Ferage Daily Membership History ADyI Qvet' (Under) Growth (Dcclinc) Year Buffet ~ March 31 Budget from Prior Year 1994-95 13,600 13,652 52 1995-96 13,650 13,721 71 69 1996-97 13,776 13,863 87 142 1997-98 13,950 13,898 {52) 35 1998-99 13,950 13,862 {8$) {36) 1994-00 13,825 13,856 31 (6) 2000-01 13,825 13,865 40 9 2001-02 13,825 13,930 10.5 GS 2002-03 13,830 14,127 297 197 2003-04 13,938 14,279 34 t 1.52 2004-US 14,126 14,365 239 86 2005-f)6 14,365 14,728 363 363, 2006-0? I4,400 14,777 377 49 2007-08 14,600 14,802 202 25 Average Daily Membership Trend 1a,s4a - = - ~ _ -- 1~1,600 = - - _ 1-1,100 _ . , ~ 11,200 ~ - - - - 14,000 - - - - ]3,840 ~ - ~-- - 13,600 -- -- t 3,440 - 13,200 n~ O° Oti °~' Ory' °a °~ °~' °`` °U' page 12 Attachment C Roanoke County Schools Summary of Operafing 1H'und Revenues and ExpenditcYres For the Year Ended .Tune 34, 2408 F3udget Actual Amount Revenues: Sales tas State aid for education ~ecleral aid for edi-cation Tuition, rent & interest Transfers in Beginning balance 14,872,000 14,342,770 (529,230) 56,562,556 57,763,714 1,201,158 197,681 378,1 S2 180,471 627,823 909,815 281,992 64,717,113 64,717,113 - 8,292,833 8,292,$33 - 145,270,006 14fi,404,397 1,134,391 0.8% ':USA of excess'reverite collections: T~-at~sl~z- to ~'Ialoi~ Ca}~ital Reserve 1~~t~ policy 1,1.,34,391 "I`r~izzsl~r t« 1/n~ergenc}- C:~ntin~cnc;y l:und (Gtti rent bal~i~icc is 52;00(},000) - - . 1,134,391. ' IJxpenditures: Personnel 112,691,921 110,070,924 2,620,997 <)perating 30,578,085 29,045,410 1,532,675 Reserve for Emergencies 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 145,270,006 139,116,334 6,153,672 2.9°/a '~lses ~f unslient exl~endit~n•c apl~~~c~p~•iatic~~~s Rollover for outsfandiii~ 13urcliasc ~~i~dcrs ~- ~ 226,5 t8 E:ollover for band unitaa.-r~~ rcl~laccnicaits _ 20,5)00 R~llpvc~. #cir ~1r(.Mnsc~ii ; 19,829 , ! Maintain ~~cscrvc`tor €~;fi7erger7cics 2;OOU,i)OQ Tra~tifcc' t~'~1inc~r t apical l;eserve pc~ policy - 1,0f1C),t10() - Trat~sfer• t~~ IVtaj~r t;apital RCSCI'VC 1~~:;r lmlicv - 2,914, 312 `'. b,'j8U~6S9 =; .. .... TotalGontribzFtion~,Eo Reserves from FY07-.08 YE per policy: .... . ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEET"ING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Regi.aest to adopt a resolution approving the sale of the Southview school property by the Roanoke County School Board SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On October 23, 2008, the Roanoke County School Board determined that it had no further use for the Southview school property located at 3568 Peters Creek Road (Tax Map No. 37.10-1-21.2). The Roanoke County School Board adopted a resolution requesting the approval of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to sell 'this property and to retain the proceeds of such sale. A copy of the School's resolution is attached. Section 22.1-129 establishes the procedure to be followed for the sale of surplus school property. If the School Board sells surplus real property, a capital improvement fund shall be established by the School Board and the proceeds of such sale retained by the School Board shall accrue to such capital improvement fund. The capital improvement fund shall only be used for new school construction, school renovation, and major school maintenance projects. STAFF RECOMMENDAI"ION: If it is the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors to allow the School Board to follow the alternative procedure for the sale of surplus real property, then the Board of Supervisors may want to consider the adoption of the attached resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board has determined that it has no further use for the Southview School located at 3568 Peters Creek Road, Tax Map Number 37.1-1- 21.2 (hereinafter the "School"); and WHEREAS, the School Board desires to sell the School and retain the proceeds of the sale with the approval of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and after holding a public hearing on such sale and retention of proceeds as provided in § 22.1-129A of the Code of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County School Board, pursuant to § 22.1-129A of the Code of Virginia, hereby requests approval of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to sell the School and then retain the proceeds of such sale, such sale to occur after the School Board holds a public hearing on the sale and retention of proceeds as provided in § 22.1-129A of the Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution, signed bythe Chairman and certified by the Clerk, shall be transmitted to he Board of Superv' ors CHAIRM Certificate I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Roanoke County School Board at its regular meeting held on October 23, 2008. ;._- Brenda F. Chastain, Clerk n ~ ~ ~ - 1' s^ ~~p~~ Memorandum of Understanding The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding between the Roaavke County Board of Supervisors {Board of Supervisors) and the Roanoke County School Board (School Board) is to signify the intent of the School Boadd to cooperate in the provision of a site for a Public Safety Building in exchange for the current Roanoke County Public Safety Building and the construction of a new warehouse adjacent to the School Board Admini ~nve Offiices on Cove Road. This memorandum is intended to establl~~the framework of future legal. agreements to be executed between Board of Supervisors and the School Board. The parties agree to proceed with the following, 1) The School Board agrees to transfer the ownership of no more than tea (IO) acres of property at the site of the current School Board Administrative Offices, 5937 Cove Road, to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for the purposes of construction of a Public Safety Building of approximately 80,000 square feet. The exact metes and bounds of the acreage will be determined by future surveys grid site plans and will be the subject of a future agreement and formal land transfer. 2) As soon as practical following the occupancy of the sew Public Safety Building at the Cove Road location by the Cotmiy, the Board of Supervisors agrees to transfer ownership of the current Public Safety Building and site located at 5368 Peters Creek Road to the School Board. The Board of Supervisors furthermore agrees to pursue funds in future budgets for renovafion of the current Public Safety Building back to a school building. 3) The Roanoke County Boadd of Supervisors agrees to grade an earthen pad on the School Board's property on Cave Road for the School Board to use for the replacement of the warehouses that will be denzo}ished as part of the site preparation for the proposed Public Safety Building and to construct replacement warehouses. The exact location and design of the replacement warehouses will be determined mutually by the Board of Supervisors and the School Board. 4) The Schoo] Board agrees to transfer ownership of the current Roanoke County Cazeer Center, located at 100 Highland Road, Vinton, to the Board of Supervisors if and when the facility is no longer aecded by the School Board. Approved this ~ day of ~~'~8 by the Roanoke County School Board and the Roanoke County Board of S ors. Jerry L. ads, an Richard C. Flora, Chairman Roanoke County School Board Roanoke County Board of SupenRSOrs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLU"PION APPROVING THE SALE OF THE SOUTHVIEW SCHOOL PROPERTY BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, on October 23, 2008, Roanoke County School Board adopted a resolution requesting the approval of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to sell the Southview school property located at 3568 Peters Creek Road {Tax Map No. 37.10- 1-21.2) pursuant to Section 22.1-129 A. of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has determined it has no further public use for this property, and that it is surplus and available for disposition by sale. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approves the sale of the Southview school property by the Roanoke County School Board after the School Board holds a public hearing on the sale of this property and the reteni:ion of the proceeds. 2. That the School Board shall establish a capital improvement fund and that the proceeds of the sale of this property retained by the School Board shall accrue to such a capital irriprovement fund. The capital irriprovement Fund shall only be used for new school construction, school renovation, and major school maintenance projects. 3. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the Chairman of the School Board. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~` - ~ AT A REGULAR NIEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DA"fE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances; consent agenda SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning APPROVED BY: John Chambliss ° County Administrator ~~~~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for December 16. 2008. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: The petition of Edward Rose Properties, Inc. to rezone approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions (approximately 12.4 acres), and C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions (approximately 3.9 acres) and to rezone approximately 11.2 acres from C-2, General Commercial District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions, forthe purpose of constructing a mixed-use development consisting of an apartment complex (approximately 23.6 acres) and con~imercial uses (approximately 7.8 acres) located at the 6200 and 6300 Blocks of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for December 16, 2008. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approve each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. d and concurred in as to Clerk is authorized and items the separate vote 2 County of Roanolcc For Staff Use Oni ~~- ~}~~~} ~~~ ~~ Community Development Pl i i & Z pate received: ' Received by: ,~j, ( ~ ann ng on ng ~T~ -~ -~S [.t~ l~II r~~,~ ~ ~-.L; 5204 Bernard Drive Appticatian fee: ofl G f ~' ~a ,S 33'- ~~~~ PC/BZA date: . •-o P 0 Box 29$00 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 - Placards issued: BOS date: ,-~~ (s=to} ~~?-~ncs 1 Ax (s4o} ~7~~-HISS C N - b / " / ase um er ~ - ~ ~ Z~ ~ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply} X Rezoning; ^ Special Use ^ Variance ^ ~Vnivcr ©Administrative Appeal ^ Comp Plan ns z-:~3at Review Applicants nameladdress tv/rip Phone: 317-388-4317 x 12~ (Laurie Corley) EDWARD ROSE PROPL-RT1LS, INC. Work: 961 Crawfordsville Road, Suite D Indianapolis, IN 4G?14 Cell #: Fay No Owner's name/address whip Phone #: Multiple--Please see attached sheet _ Work: O Fax No. #: ~' ,. CO,r:'~'1,,~„ ~O ^ Properly Location ~~On~~I~O/-' Cove Road at Green Ridge Road fv9agisterial District: Catawba u;~, 'otnnuutity Planning area: I-Ioliins-Peters Cree Tax Map No : Multiple--Please see attached sheet Existing Zoning: R-? and C-2 Size of atcel(s): 31.4 Acres--Please see attached sheet. Existin;~ Land Use: Vacant and sin le-family residential RLZUNING, SPECIAL USL•' PERItiIIT, WAI VL'R AND .COMP PLAN r t s. z. ~ z a a~ REYIL{YAPPLICANTS (R 1 s / vti'! C P ) Prvpvsed Zoning: R-3 and C-2 with conditions--Please see attached sheet Proposed Land Use: Apartment development and unspecified conunercial. Please see attached description Does the parcel meet the tninimttm lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUCRLD F1itST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes .X No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST ]f rezoning request, ate conditions being proffered with this request? Yes X No ^ I~ARIANCE, ~ IYAIIBR AND AD~bIINISTItATIVE APPEfIL APPLICANTS (Y/if~/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the EZoanoke Cauniy Zoning Ordinance in ostler to: A eat of Zonin Administrator's decision to A eat of Inte retation of Section{s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to fs the annIication com~lele? Please check if enclosed. APPLICA"PION WILL NOT BIv ACCCPTED IF ANY OP TIIESE ITE MS ARC MISSING UR INCOMPLETE. ursr~vrcr vr.~,t RlS/W/CP V/AA R/SIW/CP V!M Consultation ~-1 Application fie Application ~_= S I/?" x l l"concept plan Justification - -_' Nletes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Water and server application Adj~ininb owners I hereUy certify that I atn either Ute owner of the property ar the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the I:nuwledge and consent of the owner Edwardosc Prop ties c., CantraU Purchaser dy .-U~~~ _ _ _-- ---- --- -- --_ i;;I12.34~IU-1, tU9(i9=I-00001-Uri 2 3ITSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN ttaz-:ni1RIJVIEW RT;QUESTS Applicant EDWARL7 ROSE PROPERTIES, INC. The Plaruring Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan { 15.2-223'?) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible Use additional space if necessary ease explain hotiv the request furthers the purposes of the Roanolcc County Ordinance as well as the purpose found the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the 7,oning Ordinance. The R-3 district is "intended to coincide with the ....transition land use categor[y]" of the Community Plan; to have :ess to major streets, sewer and water, and schools having adequate capacity; and with parcel sizes large enough to permit ell-planned residential development." It is also "intended to serve as a buffer between less intensive residential areas and .re intensive . , . districts " The proposed apartment development satisfies all of those criteria: It is located in the Core and rnsition areas; fronts on a major street and is only a short distance from Nortlt L•lectric Road and I-$1; has access to sewer 1 water, is a short distance from Glen Cove Elementary School and convenient to Northside Junior and Senior High pools; will be a carefully designed, unitary development covering almost 24 acres; and will buffer the existing residential ghborhood from existing and future commercial uses along C-.ove Road and North Electric Road. The purpose of the C-2 district is "to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities ving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county." The district is "most appropriately found along jar arterial thoroughfares." Land uses widtin the district "are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in Transition and Core land use categories" of the comprehensive plan This commercial site is readily accessible to a large rounding area via T-8I, Narth Electric Road, Green Ridge Road and Cove Road, and is located in Core and Transition Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Flan. The land which is the subject of this application is located in areas designated "Core" and "Transition" in the Conmrunity Plan. (Please see the attached portion of the Land Use Map,) The major portion of the proposed commercial site is in the Core area, and the major portion of the apartment site is in the Transition area. The Core area is intended for "high intensity urban development" and "larber-scale highway oriented retail uses" involving clustered retail uses and planned office and institutional uses, served by an arterial street system. The proposed commercial site is just a few hundred feet along Cove Road from North lectric Road and readily accessible to and from I- $l,both major commercial thoroughfares The Transition area is to serve as a less intensively developed buffer between highways and adjacent lower intensity development. Multi-family development is an approved land use type in the Transition area. This apartment development will buffer the existing single-family neighborhoods to t}~e north and east from the commercially zoned land along North Electric Road and Cove Road. The Community Plarr calls for a high standard of design in architecture, landscaping and signage. The proffered concept lan reflects a planned community incorporating all of these elements, including the desired vegetative and topographical buffering and in particular the preservation of existing large trees. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adj Dining properties, and the snrrounding area, as yell as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/server, roads, schools, parlcslrecreation and fire and rescue, The proposed 7.8-acre commercial site {3.9 acres of which is already zoned GZ) wilt lie along, and be accessed from, Cove Road, and the 23 b-acre apartment development will be situated behind that, also being accessed from Cove Road. The mire area between Cove Road and lnterstate 81, west of the commercial site, is highway right of way, so no private owners will be directly impacted by the commercial uses. The apartment development will entirely screen the commercial site from properties to the east and will itself be substantially screened on the east by existing large trees. 77re property lies only a few hundred yards from North Electric Road and its access ramps to and from I-S1, which are the outes expected to absorb the majority of the traffic impacts from both the proposed commercial and apartment uses Please see the attached Traffic Study. Water and sewer are available Please see attached letter from WVWA, The new Roanoke County Recreation and Aquatic Center; only 2..3 miles away via Green Ridge and Wood Haven Roads, should be able to accommodate the recreation needs of the apartment residents, who will also have access to the recreational facilities {clubhouse with fitness renter, swimming pool) which will be included in the project. {.f l 123~tA0-l , 109694-00001.01) County fug and rescue responders will be the Mason's Cove Station (5.1 miles away) and the Hollins Station {4,G miles away}, though the nearest emergency services facility is actually the City of Roanoke's Station #13 on Peters Creek Road, only 2.3 Holes and less than 5 minutes away. While it is of course impossible to predict the exact makeup of the tenant population of the apartrnent project, the developer's experience would suggest that the tenant mix will not include a large number of families with school-aged children. In any event, based on its web page, Glen Cove Elementary School would appear to have a capacity of in excess of 800 children and a current enrollment of less than .5D0, so that even in the event an unexpectedly large percentage of the tenant population consists of families with children, overloading of Glen Cove School from this development would not seem likely ~#it23440-1,109694-00001-O1} JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15 2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe haw the request meets each factor. if additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. The variance shall not he contrary to the public interest and shall he in harmony w7th the intended spirit and purpose of the rine Ordinance. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as inguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibitor unreasonably restrict the use of the property. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity, Such hardships should be addressed by Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district, l~I1123440-1, 109694-00001-O1 ~ JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMII~IISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as passible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: Evidence supporting claim: {It11234A0-1,109694-00601-O1} CONCEPT PLAN CHGCICLIST A concept plan of dre proposed project must be submitted with the application The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered Further, the plan shall address any potential land use ar design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doinb, correct any deficiencies that tnay not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance ofa building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to Ehe initial concept plan Unless limiting conditions arc proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (l5 ?-Z?32) review and variance applications The plmt should be prepared by a professional site planner. 7hc level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the requesE The County Planning Division staff may exempt some ofthe items or suggest the addition ofexlra items, but the following are considered minimum: AL L APPLICr1NTS a Applicant name and name of development ~ b Date, scale and north arrow ~/ c Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions ~ d Location, names of owners and Roanoke County the map numbers of ac[joining properties f e Physics[ features such as Ground cover, natural watercourses, i7oodplain, etc / f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties ~, g All property lines and casements ~/ h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights / i L ocatiott, widths and natnes ofall existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development ~/ j Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Addiriarnl infarrnatinn r egrrirerl for RE2'Oh'!NG c'nrcl SPEGffL. USE PL• R~t•fIT APPL,IC~L'JTS '/ k Existing ttti[ities (water, sewer, storm drains} and connections at the site f 1 Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers ~ m Topography trap in a suitable scale and contour intervals J n Approximate street grades artd site distances at intersections t3A o L ocations of all adjacent fre hydrants +I P p Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed NA q If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist shove are complete ,cdW Rr7~ie (°!-o rbry, fvtc.~ GdtafntcF ffirc~ldG£r- ~ : o~~ ~ ~. ~a8 ignaturc of aplrlicatrt Datc G Community Development Planning & Zoning Division NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL, USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COtvIMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public, Sheet Waiver or Special Use Fer7nit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public Dearing. If it is the opinion of the rnajar-ity of the Planning Calnrnissioners present at the scheduled public hear'il~g that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional infornratian prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional infonnatiat~ and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written rnernorandurn by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be wan~anted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke CaL1Rty Plalltling Comrntssran reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests furtl~er traffic analyses and/ar a traffic impact shtdy i:hat would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note. a list of potential land irse.s arad sitcratiorr,s tlrcrt r~vould r7ecessitate ~irrther study is pr°ovrded as prn~t of thrs applicatior7 paclcnge). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. bffective Date: April l9, Z00~ Narne of Petition &dward G5e Prn rlirr. (qc., Coy>'rucF Pur~rR.rer ay: r r Petitioner's Signature ~ my fi ~. ~ ~' ?. 9 7 ~ z a Tg U~/ +l/~ ~, Yy OCJ Date Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL Or NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSTS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The fo{lawing is a fist of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, si.lbdivisian waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and i/DOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High 7rafl:tc~Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with mare than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows} • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: Financial institutions, general, medical, etc,) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e,g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 450, 11/460, 220, Z21, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously subrrlitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (1D0) trips during the {tl l 123440-1. 109694-0~001- Dli peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or aver seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day (~t112344fl-1,109694-00001-l-0I) REZONING APPLICATION EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC. PARCELS TO BE REZONED LIST OF TAX MAP NUMBERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS Tax Map No. Acreage Owner, Address and Telephone J036,11-02-04.00 10.350 Baldwin-Swift Properties LLC .3216 Williamson Road Roanoke, V A 24012 537-0055 (Dan Baldwin) ./036.11-02-03.00 1,17.3 Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC P. O, Box 20I Roanoke, VA 24002 29.3-8506 (Calvin Powers) f1, 0.36.11-02-02.00 1,152 Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC ,/0.36.11-02-01.00 0.133 Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC ,036.11-02-0 i .O1 3.490 Melvin L. and Pauline .I. Rank 6356 Cove Road, NW Roanoke, VA 24019 ~~ 562-1829 J036.11-02-36.00* 15.094 Estelle H. Ronlc et al. 3.317 Garner Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 562-2780 (Estelle Ronk) *Tax Parcel 036.11-02-36,00 comprises a total acreage of 27.372. Edward Rose Properties, Inc, is purchasing a 15.094-acre portion of this tract, which will be subdivided for the sale. Only that 15.094-acre portion is being rezoned. (#11235.23-1,!09694-0000!-OJJ REZONING APPLICATION EDWARD RO5E PROPERTIES, INC. AREAS TO BE REZONED NOTE: Maps and metes and bounds descriptions of each parcel are at Tab 5. Tax Map No. Current Zonin Rectuested Zoning 036.11-02-04.00 R-2 R-3 036.11-02-0.3.00 R-2 R-:3 - 1.173 acres C-2 - 17 square feet 036.11-02-02.00 R-2 R-3 - 0.810 acre C-2 - 0.342 acre 036.11-02-01.00 R-2 C-2 036.11-02-01.01 R-2 C-2 - :3..436 acres R-.3 - 0.054 acre 036,11-02-36.00 C-2 R-3 - I1.199 acres (Remaining 3.$9.5 acres stays C-2) (tlJ 1235131 109694-00001-O1 f 2 ~~. '~ ,.~ i ~ ~ a ~ ~ .j , a '~ .1 ' ` 1 s ~` e ~ ~ `~ \ ~ ~ ~ + ~ i ~' \ { - ~ ~ r A O ..' { ~~ ~ ~ O s x ~~i r,., ~ • L ~ ~ I % gg ~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~~ S~ a o ` ! / O{y { / ff S r ~ ~ '~ _z ~~ i - , ~ - ~ A ~~~~~ ~ pQ ,~ `~~ ~ 3 ~ { i ~; _ { r , - . !! ~ ~' i ! / r a ~ \ 5~ ~~ ` ~i ~ 'l1 ~ i i B , ,O~ ° { ~4 d ~~~~39 i /' ~ ~ - ~ ~ . r t~ & ~ l i ;~ Ilil t i ' ~ ` ~ ~ B~i~SE ~/ it ~ ~ ° r ~ ~.,) _~ \e' \ b - y ~....., ~.~ „~ r O ~ oIVU " w~ •C~~ ~~~~3~ w / .i -q~ i ~ i -°cao ~ also ~ / Oo 1 i ~ ~ J~~1 p i ~ " "_ / G' o~~ k i ~ e ` i Z ti ~~'~ i1 tl ~ , Q,o°~ ~6 04 fi ~ ~ ~'S ~~ i - c ~lap~p~ .r I ' i .~. t , ~~~~ i - a~g ~~ ~~ ?P pqR~ 1 ~S €d~~~i3 ~ ~ ~B f ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~~4 ~~~~8~ a4~i~~ °~~ i~e~~o ~~'~~~~ 1'~`~ ~~`~~ -~ ,~ ,* F,? , - yo V~~, . ~~~05 °'~ Fi~~O~ . ~~~. ~g`v ~~ ~` / + ~\ 8° /~ 6~' Y7„ i ~ i~ D i = i~D _~ yon ~; ;ii Y ~; ~~ 1~, i. ~ Y / Y aka-¢ ~~ ~ ~°.Y~ a+ ~ ess Y~.fd/ ` ~, ! J/a~' F i~ C ~ f 6 1,-_ 6 ~ Y ~ f ?! YIt^ ~! ea ,,// oY. 5 . 1 918! "` ~ '~ -as ~ ~ 1 ~ r E ~ ~ ~Y ti P ~~ ,~ ~ ~ rti ~~ ~ ~ ~P ~_ R i. r = ~ Y o~ as 1 c,,, ~ S~ @.rea / ~ ~` / E E 4 REZONING APPLICATION EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPER AND THE PROJECT THE DEVELOPER: Edward Rose Properties, Inc. is a family-owned company headquartered in Farmington I-Iills, Michigan. The Rase family has been continuously involved in residentiai development and construction since 1921 and since 1965 has concentrated its efforts on apartment construction and management. The company now owns and manages over 53,000 rental units in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin. Developments in Virginia include Waterfront in Virginia Beach (684 units}, The Vinings in Riclunond (258 units), Trophy Club (248 units) and Enclave (254 units} in Midlothian, and 5unscape on Colonial Avenue in Roanoke County (264 units). The new Roanoke project is being developed by and will be managed from Rose's regional office in India~aapolis, which also manages Sunscape, Edward Rose Properties builds apartments to hold for its own account. It last sold a development in 1986. It is therefore committed to constructing and maintaining developments with a high standard of quality. THE PRO.IECT; The proposed apartment project will consist of 12 buildings on 23.6 acres, comprising a total of 252 apartment units, plus a management office and clubhouse. While a final decision has not yet been made on the the exact configuration of the units, a typical Rose project of this size contains a mix of .35%one-bedroom units, 50% two-bedroom units, and 15% three-bedroom units. The commercial area totals 7.8 acres and will consist of two pads, bisected by the entrance road, Depending on the exact location of the entry drive, the pads will be roughly identical in size. Deed restrictions will be used to insure that the appearance of the buildings constructed on the commercial site is generally consistent with the design and construction of the apartment buildings. ~t~rra3sz3-~, io969a-oaaor-ofl EXISTING ZONING CONDITIONS PROPERT Y CURRENT L Y Z(NVED v v G2=15.1 AC. f/ ® PRORERTYCURRE)YTCYZONED R-2 =18.3 AC. +/- vvvvv vvvvvd ~ vvvvvv ' vvvvv~'v \ vvvvv vvvvvlvi' '~ vvvvv,4;' vvvvvvd` ~. /~' vvvvv~¢~ v vvvvv~~v'~ -" -" vvvvvvw •~j vvvvvb •, ~~Jw, vvvvv ~~ vvvvvv ~~.• ~vvvvv~v ,S .~vvvvv~aa~~~ ~~~-~.. ~y b:vvvvv'vv ~, vvvvv~~v v'~twvv ~v vv~~vvwvv vv'~zv~tc~vvv vvvvvvvv v'~~'v'w v v v GRAPHIC SCALE ,~ ~, ~ v ~ a ;, vvvv ~bvvvv~ c~~~ '~ ~, ,. v v v v 1 Imb ~ L00 R ' ~ `I 1 ~vvv i" 1 '9 m 1 ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ C ~ ~h ~~~ a ~ ~g ~ ~, , ~ 1, ;, ,, ,, 11 ,~ PROPOSED ZONING CONDITIONS /- AMOUNrOIFPROPERrrzONED C-ZAFlER RQON/NC = 7.8 AC. + AMOUNT OFPROPERTYZOWED RAFTER RQONING= 23.6AC. ® PRO~PERTYRQONEDFROMR-2 P]~{ PROPERTYREZONEDFROMR-Z PROPERTYREZONEDFROM G2 v v TORE= ff2AC. +/- PROPERTY TOREMAINC-2 AFTER ,• ~m~ , '' p n r ~ i C --~1 T n ~''~, a ~ ~ r ~a D 1 ~ r r ~, ~; ,, ,r • 11 ,'vvvvvv rvvvvvvv~~ a4~• P vvvvvvv '. , Q'vvv~vvQ ~3~''` ~ovvvvvov ~~• •.~y vvvvvvvv , vvvvvavv vvvvvbvvv<:, vvvvv'vvv~`"<,~ vvvvagvvv :vvvvvvvv `~vvv'wvvv GRAPHIC SCALE `~,, v v v v v v ,. so. ao .es F~~ .a 'O Q v v v v 'Cf~, ~,vvvvv~',,e ', dvvvvv~t cn~~~ ' vvvv~ i~-croon v v v..~ ~~~ v ~`. \ _ The following is a deed description for Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04 to be rezoned from R-2 to R-3~ The description is as follows: BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of--way of Cove Road {Virginia Secondary Route 7$0}, said point also being northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel .36,11- 02-05; thence leaving Cove Road and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05, S .37° 24' 22" W, 4.38.65 feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of Tax Parce1.36.11-02- 05; thence continuing with Tax Parce1.36.11-02-05, S .39° 21' 23" E, passing the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel .36.11-02-06 at 90.00 feet, in a11276.91 feet to a point, said point being the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.1 I -02-06; said point also located on the westerly boundary of Plain View Subdivision and on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel .36.11-02-09; thence leaving Tax Parcel #36.11-02-46 and with Plain View Subdivision, S 4.3° 25' 00" W, 959.4$ feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01, said point also located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.15-O1-O 1 and with Tax Parcel .36.11-OZ-36, N 07° 04' 26" E, passing the southeasterly comer of Tax Parcel #36.11-02-01..01 at 740.04 feet, in all 916.97 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax Parcel .36.11-02-0.3; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 and with Tax Parcel #.36.11-02-03 far the following 2 courses; thence S 84° .39' 30" E, 120.66 feet to a point; thence N 17° 28' 30" E, 550.84 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of Cove Road; thence leaving Tax Parcel #.36.11-02-03 and with the southerly right-of--way of Cove Road for the fallowing 4 courses; thence with a curve to the right which said curve is defined by delta angle of .34° 18' 12", a radius of 531,2.3 feet, an arc distance of 318.05 feet, a chord of 31.3.32 feet and bearing S 64° 1 l' :35" E to a point; thence S 44° 27' 17" E, 28.55 feet to a point; thence N 45° 32' 4.3" E, .30.00 feet to a point; thence S 44° 27' 17" E, 40.50 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 10..350 acres. W O N t+ p p Q ` 1 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ O zN°~ ~°~ ~ooc~Qr.yq¢ O p O ~ ~ cn " Op ~ ' Z ~ ¢f Ci ~N a ~ O w j c Q Z ~ O ~ ~ ~ ` `~z °q wo ~ 7, N ~ "' N O~ ~ Q ~~m ~° o ~ ¢~ ~ GI O i "i ~ ~~~~yM _ I„ ~U~ ~ V II tl I 1t ~ ~ ~~t-~mta l O4RJ ~(l 1 w W ~,. _. ~~~~ ~s v TO VA N ~Y Q'~d~ Add A ~ ° ~ o z z oR~ ~~~ ~ i ~ ~ 4 m :.. ~ t~~ I to ti ~ ~ ~ 0 0 N 4 l 0 x ti j e ~, a ~ I 2 ~a ®_® 9N1NQZ Zas,r~ ~NlN02 £N 0 0 tim ~ o ~ ~ '~ ~•, ev M <a >c ~ w iq~ ~ Iry ~ ~~ ~~ o+ H ~^ ~r i ~' o ~~ ~~ ~_ _ ~ 20.66' o ~. O C!j ~ ~m ~~~ I~ LI ~ ~ I~ ~v ..~ O oC a~ O ti H C~J py~ ;tj "'! Op . ~~. 4h ,, ~ of ~ Op. ~~ bD. ~O- ~O1 •-1'bl ltgl' ao~f. `~6~~ ~ . ~ y~ ~~ FOB'' ~~ O. F~ ~ Off! t0 ~;\ ~~~ti zo ~ 4 f'i ~ /,~o ~ ~~~ / ~~ ~ , o~ ,- l 1~ / f ~ . /~/f z~ ~ r w Opp ~~~b.! lr9F z ~ z ~ '~h~ ~ `~~ l~9F ~~ ~/ 009/ ~ OjP~ N z~. .,pp~ 1~9~ ~.~~~ v"i Op~O `. ~ Oqv' /O~ ~'Q ~b1 sr.9r b ~ ~~ n O C] c7 a N O II a z 4 O q U w U N r ~ .- c ~~~ Z aoo ~~ 2~a O"@1 a 5 w to b L o ~ ~t 2 ~ z Z ~~~ moz moo mZ 7 C X40 ~~~ U ci ~, U 0~~ ~~~ Z~~ w ~ ~ n ~, x ~zo ~~~ „-aW~ ae-gooet ca~m~~ort~o~~ooz~Sa~IMO,o~~M The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parcel 3611-02-0.3 to be rezoned from R-2 to R-3. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of=way of'~Tirginia Secondary Route 780 (Cove Road}, said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax Parcel 36.11- 02-04 for the following 2 courses; thence S 17° 28' 30" W, 550.84 feet to a point; thence N 84° .39' 30" W, 120.66 feet to a point, said point located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-O1.Ol;thence leaving Tax Parcel .36. i 1-02-04 and with Tax Parcel 3G.11-02-01.01 for the following 2 courses; thence N 07° 50' 30" E, 131.31 feet to a point; thence N 03° 36' 30" W, 773 feet to a point; thence with new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-0.3, N 09° 45' 10" E, 12.15 feet to a point; said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax parcel 36.11.-02.02; thence with the boundary of Tax Parcel .36.11-02-02, S 84° 28' 30" E, 77.16 feet to a point; thence N 14° 49' 30" E, 390.82 feet to a paint, said paint located an the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02 and with Virginia Secondary Route 780 with a curve to the tight which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 09° 39' 36" , a radius of 531.2.3 feet, an arc length of'89.57 feet, a chord of 8946 Feet and bearing S 86° 10' 29" E, to the point of BEGINNING and containing 1. i 7.3 acres. I ho ~ eP'I o f EO-Z-II 9C-ROD EltO V+ c ~ ~ pU~ iv ~ u '~ ~ Q ~ O ;- ~ ~i p CY V_~-I c~~h n Z ~ ~~ ~ q ^J u V3~zNZ~U~~ O ~~q~~~q~C~.~ o ~, ~ z ~ _. ~~ ~~~ q ~ ~ U ~ COVE RQAD VA. C~~w VARIRS~) 80 ---~T~ ~p N6VY ~t R7E $41g z z i ~ ui ti a D o v vvi a .- U-, ~ ~ P v Ci n ~ h h W '6S e ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ r o '~ G h b O Z o ry' j rv ~ ¢ ~C 4i O ~ Z_ ^ ~ o l- a, U O^ ~ ~ ~ ) p I,q.' ~ ~ ~~ a ~xt O ~ O d k 2 E z` ~! ~ ~ O d l ~ ~O ~~ ' ifaaZ ~ ~~ o vo.C~' q ~~~ Z ~ Q U (~] o t*7 U L~ ~ ~+ ti '~I~ ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~° ~i 77.16' h Vp ~~ x 3 ~~Q S7 c°v In ~' ~ C'3 ~~ " ~ °~ ui~ ~~rx ti ~ - ~N c ° ~ •? ~ ~ uj ~ '~ ? ~ o zz ¢~ ~~ ~ ;~~~ ~ ~ZQ ~m ~ ~~ a ~ ~ w ,~,: © ~I o ~ ~ ~ N 8d'39'JO" w 12o.ss' ~ ~ ~;plil~l~l~ iE,~ I OMp'IQICD •Z-l l'8C-go DCI LD\~~9\DEC[D\[002\s0ulrno~p\~m Tlie following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parcel 35.11-2-03 to be rezoned from R-2 to [:-2. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, said point also located on the easterly boundary of Tax #.36.11-02-01.01; thence leaving Tax #.36.11-02- 02 and with Tax #36.11-02-01.01, S 03° 35' 30" E, 12,27 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-01.01 and with the new zoning line through the property of Tax #.3611- 02-03, N 09° 45' 10" E, 12.15 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax #36,11-02-02; thence with Tax #36.11-02-02, N 84° 28' .30" 1~', 2.84 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 17 square feet. uno6ul°f0'Z-tt 9C-Ca0f tL0 •` ~ ~ ~ pU~ w ti e ~ O ~ ~~Cy m ~ .- O ~ nt ~ x~oIZU~~~ ~4y~QZlJ'7 r~o~~~~~Uj W^~~c~~uQad ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U~ {{ ~ CO`s R ~ ~~7g0 c~ v ~ ~ ao VA~ tR~W VARIES} z ~J o c 1 ~ 14' °i ~ v z w C~ ~o ~ ~ z o~1 ~~~ ~ Wo ~ ~ a Z IAN ~ {~~ F' o v ~ ~` ~ ~ ~~ c°~p ~' ~ O Q] '' ~ o ~ ~ ~~~ ~. ~~°' ^"z 1 v a ~ ~ ~ W ~ Q~~ Q O w ~ ~3 O Q ~ G- ~ ,,7 r~ n Q O ~ ~ a ~ ~ .- o O ~ ~ ry' I ^~ t~ ~ o L z A o~ ~ p ~ ca Ui Ca W (~ ("~ w ro } O q K I < ~ i R ~., m ~ ++°' ate; ~ m~' a I~ c~ rrj o ~ x Y ~ `4a = p~ I mOQ ~' ~ ~ [~2 0 ,A ~ ~ O p ti ''~ij, a z ~~ d +~ ~ 7 i or `o ~ ' LK to o ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ o ~ ~ 1~., ~ c~ ~ cy ~ -~ ®® {may ~~ 3 ~'~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ .may ,^7 ~...t h k 3 ~ I 77.16' h U p ~ ~ ~ ~_ S 84'28 30 E ~ >- d °~o ~80,DD- C!~ ov¢~, ~~ z.~ bF ~ ~~~ ~~~~~//// tee I ~- ~ ` ~N _ ~ ° w^ s~ ~ ~ W ^~~ o ~ ~zo `=' ~ o m i z ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I l N 84'39'30" W 12D.66' ~MP'f0'2-{t'8C'9opf1L0\Jn~~Of {LO\L002\BDU~MeJp\-M Tize following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #.36.11-02-02 to be rezoned from R-2 to R-3. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at a point located an the southerly right-of--way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-0.3 (Parcel II) (D.B. 1706, Pg. 376}; thence leaving Virginia 5ecandary Route 780 and with the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.1 ]-02-03, S 14° 49' 30" W, 39(}.82 feet to a point; thence continuing with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-0.3, N 84° 28' 30" W, 77.] 6 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax Parcel .3611-02-03 and with the new zoning line through Tax parce136.11-02-02, N 09° 45' 10" E, 362.1.0 feet to a paint, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence with a curve to the right, which said cun~e is defined by a delta angle of 09° 22' 17", an arc length of 83.08 feet, a radius of 507.96 feet, a chord of 82.99 feet and bearing N 81 ° 46' 29" E, to a point; thence continuing with a curve to the right, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 03° 35' S4", an arc length of .33...36 feet, a radius of 531.23 feet, a chord of .3.3.36 feet and bearing N 87° 11' 45"Eta the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.81 acres. Zi48C-9oDClL4 O Z ~ ti O~Q z ~ d iY~Lh ~~~ -,° ~~:~ ~, o~ U O~jo~~ cn r..~ p p ~~ z~`~ , m-'N~ ~ ti_ °puic~'~ ~c o U ~¢ ~ j ¢~ pip H Q[bO ~ Q _~ G3 F -O ~U~ O ~C . ~ R~~'~ ~R~~~ 12~~S C~ s~° '`D ~ ~~9 R ~ V] 0 z n". p +^'i ~„ as s¢ 3 (Jj ~ I :~ O~~"R ~V ~ e ~ 1 t~~y' N 4~~. e~~ I~ °~ wq ~ ~ ~ ~ m Q G1 ~I ~ ~~~ "I`~, ~ ~~ I`i Iw '~ ~ ~ 0 CO ~ •~ =~. ~ ~ .~ 12 ~H 1-a ~ ~ H Z ~I ~' I 0 b 1 4 n o~ SIR x ti W R`~~' ~~ao a. ~i °a O r^i N'~j w 4' ~o ~a^ k ~ ~ O ti T7. B' 8#'28'30° IY 80.00' ./ 0 0 a u 0 m 0 N N D O O z Q C] O U 0 r ~ ~ 11 O r IL U N ~ ~ ~ .- v ~r ~ O u ~~~ ooQ ~~~ o~~ x a 4 E w w ~ w ~ ~ ~, K z z ~~~ mom N W ~ m O O, Q U~ [W ~"-' ~ '~~ U ~~~ ~~ ,~, ~ .r ~", {] '-` C.7 ~--~ LZz7 ~ ~MP'iQ)Z-Z-4 L'8C-9op CLlp\~n9\DEL10\!0 The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parce136.11-02-02 to be rezoned from R-2 to C-2. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at point located on the southerly right-af--way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northeasterly corner of Tax Parce1:36.11-02- O1,Parcel III (D.B. 1706, Pg. 376); thence leaving Tax Parce1.36.1 I-02-O1 and with the southerly right-of--way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 with a curve to the right, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 10° 04' Sb", a radius of 507.96 feet, an arc length of 89.38, a chord of 89.27 feet and bearing N 72° 02' S2" E to a paint; thence with a new zoning line thru the property of Tax #36.11-02-02, Parcel 1 (D.B. 1706, Pg, 376); S 09° 45' 10"W, 362.10 feet to a point, said point located on the boundary of Tax Parce1:36,11- 02-0.3; thence leaving new zoning line and with Tax Parce1.36.11-02-03, N 84° 28' 30" W, 2.84 feet to a point, said point located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36,11- 02-01.01; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and with Tax Parce136.11-02-01.01, N 03° 36' .30" W, passing the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel #36.11-02-01 at 251.45 feet, in all .329.74 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 0.342 acres. l Inod ol'I ~ I2'Z'I l'8 C'Vo0 Ci LO 0 z ~O ~ QU~ z - ~~~~ ~~~ . ~ ~kR! N0'Q ~vi~W UV~ ~rn ~Jp pz `i ~ ~ M ~ L ~ ~ ~ U ~~~ ~~° ~~~ ~ ~~~ 0 a z EG ~~~ ~,~g0 ~ o`er R° ~ l~~w a A ~ C. C G4 . ;{/~V~i td ~~, ~~9 R~` ~, 0 o` i ~ .~ U ~ Q 6 Q- '~la k Q ~e~ ~~~ I Q~~ O ~ C 47 o ~; N G] O ~ ~ O ~ M ~ ~~4 ~~~ r-1 v CJ rD ~ o ~ 7: 7 V Q , ~ ~ J ~ O ~ ~~' ~~ ~ N 4 r7 i 1 ~. ~; 4 , o N G3 , i ~ ~ I ~~ I d ~'1 ~N ~N N ~ 1~ D ~~ ~~ ~I I Q ~ ZIx W >a ~ ~~~ '", c~ ~ ~ ~ o ~' is M ~~ ¢~ O T'7 x m 0. k ti n.fs` 8478'30' W 80.0~~',. d ~o O t0 4 U N C m °o N .~ O O 0 z ui ~ i o O U 0 ~n ~ II a r w U ~ ~ ~~o v v ^ a ~ ~ Z w aso =~ z~3 O"@~ _ -~ a w ~ m Z o of N Q Z z U ~_ ~ o > n ui x Y 000 ~ ~ ~~O ~a~ U ~ U O°¢ ~~a CJ7 ~--~ w ~~' z I~-lwa o0 Et20\Jne \O Ei L~\L~O The following is a deed description for Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01 to be rezoned from R-2 to C-2. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of--way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 (Cove Road), said paint also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 3611-02-02; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax #36.11-02-02, S 03° 36' 30" E, 78.29 feet to a point, said point being located on the northerly boundary of Tax #36.11-02-0101; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-02 and with Tax #36.11-02-01,01, S 89° 36' 20" W, 133,69 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly right-of--way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 and with Gove Road with a curve to the right which said curve is defined by a delta angle of l 7° 06' 22", a radius of 507.96 feet, an arc length of 151.66 feet, a chord of 151.09 feet and bearing N 58° 27' 1.3" E to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0133 acres. 11~0691't •Z'LL BE'9oDCItO F, qU~ _ n a ~ ~° ~_ ~ z~'~~ ~°~ I ~ QnO~VO~~ U2j ~,~, ~ p Z 't'J -, {~ Vi ~Qs~^t~~¢¢~ w~~z ~¢~ o~~ ~~~ ~U~ o M ~ N ~ fl O ,... UJ 0 0 r r ~ ~ '1 ~ N o z o { 1 1 N W 133.69 / ° z Z~~ S 69'36'2a~ I// t JP ~ '- ~ ~' i p w ~ ri ~j ~ •~ ~ 1 ~4' ~~ orn L~ m ~ ~, ~ ® ~ I tL7 I ~ zO Q ~1tif O ~ ~ / ~" N F~ CIJ~ I ° r3 ~' CV 4t ~ O Q 1 ~'~ II ~~` '~ / a ~ y I ~ ~\ / ~ I `_ ~ ~ I I ' O ~ " ~ O ~ o U---- N O "~i I O ~1 O k 1 ti ~~ o M ~~ t }c 1 I 1 ~ - _ ft ~ ~~ ~~ 1 1 I~ ~ l' ° I '~ ~6 ~ ~0 gF`ZO-~! 9Sc7~ X6'1 z° J (} ~ ~~~ Q u N U ^z` w P 1 O R b Z o 0 ~ nl d Z ^Zr J ~ a md~ rv rli mm0 v ~ ~°~O ~aa ~~ C1, C!2 E..., t]r U p O 7-- ~ v~ ~' z c~ ~~~ y~~.,~ ~~o ~ c~ .~aw~° W ~ rn O F~~y^z ~ a hR~ ~ m U ¢ C ti J m x The following is a deed description far a portion of Tax #,36.11-02-01.01 to be rezoned from R-2 to C-2. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at a comer located on the southerly right-of way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 {Cove Road), said paint also located on the southerly boundary of Tax #36.ll - 02-O1;tbence leaving Cove Road and with Tax #.36.1 i-02-O1, N 89° 36' 20" E, 133.d9 feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax #.36.11-02-02; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-01 and with Tax #36.11-02-02, S 0.3° 36' 30" E, 26.3.72 feet to a paint; thence with a new zoning line through Tax #36.11-0201.01, S 09° 45' l0" W, 31.3.61 feet to a point; said point located on the northerly boundary of Tax #36.11-OZ-.36; thence with said tax parcel, N 72° 48' 44" W, .339.60 feet to a point, said paint located on the southerly right-of way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence icaving Tax #36,11- 02-.36 and with Virginia Secondary Route 780 for the following 2 courses; thence N I6° 34' 12" E, 243.87 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right which said curve is defined b,y a delta angle of 32° .34' 20", an arc length of 288,77 feet, a radius of 50796 feet, a chord of 284.90 feet and hearing N .33° 36' S2" E to the place of BEGINNING and containing 3.436 acres. ~n urlrP i-cn tlt'v~Vnto 0 p i' ~ Q U ti OQ ~ a~C~h z~°~ ~°~ j oviog~yva .' ~„ v ~,,~ ti~D= pN0~0~~ °i~o W ~C~o ~ m ~'r~~~~¢U ~ l., I WU~m ~3~ ~ ~ < ~ a I- O d • ,! a F 133.69 +~ ~ ~ 893~2~~ ~ °o Q k N 0 ti N d I - i- 4pa .. N Q _ ti v_ °0 ~_ r•i ¢~ ~ ~ ~e•S s a G" ,~ N ~ u, ~ ,r N ! \ lO r~r V O W ~~ ,.o ~,'_ ~ o -: nt ~ a .. ~~ Ip [ri ~ ~~ n p O V Oi Oz ~ q bi I i„ ~ ~ O o N ~ II P ,_ ~~ ~ O O c i° Q O z ~ U W ~ ~ ~ r ~ a O T ~ II ~ i~ a n n Z O w ~ ~ fl ~ Vl ,~ 5 Z Q ] ~~ 11 ~ V 4 Y C - ^ _ W O n O ~ N Q ?~ w c [d ~"7 h O ~C {y ti ~ ~ ,~ w . ~ o $ ~'~~~ - . z ~~ ~ ~~ 3I v O ,I N O ... ~ ~ 2 '.~ P O r ~ ~ ,9! bSF .A975F`F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .b^i'il +.~ ht ,ti~et~[ N • 1 00' x ~ o~ 9F'ZO-1! 9F0~' Xfrl ~ 1 ~;~ W ~ Z O z z ~~a m o> n~ ui m m a ~ ~ ~n:a ~'~ W -~ Q O~~ c:~ Z~x w ~} ~ QW~ Z W Ll.'' or+p~ls~l•1-L-14'Of•4nOCtLO Vag\Ofl1a\LOOt\auu~nlp\~M The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #36-11-0201.01 to be rezaned from R-2 to R-3. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of Tax #36.11-02-.36, said point also located on the westerly boundary of Tax #36.1 I-02-04; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04 and with Tax #36.11-02-36, N 72° 48' 44" W, 14.56 feet to a paint; thence leaving Tax #.36.11-02-36 and with a new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-O1.OI, N 09° 45' 10" E, 313.61 feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax #36.11- 02-03; thence continuing with said parcel for the following 2 courses; thence S 0.3° .36' 30" E, 7.73 feet to a point; thence S 07° 50' 30" W, 131..31 feet to a point, said paint being the northwesterly corner of Tax 36.11-02-04; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-03 and with said Tax #36.11-02-04, S 07° 04' 26" W, 176.93 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.054 acres. 11 n vnal.IvlL l• d-LL 9 E`9vOCL L0 I.L 4 o ~ F` qv ¢" ~0.oQ ~4~ Z^OI ~ ~J~ ~~~o~ 0 ~N~ ~ ~ ~ m F R O ~ V ~ 0 Q 0 ~~ ~~ 0 ~~ '"1 C .~~ ~~ !~ ~~t VO ~g ~~ ~ ~~' ~o~ ti Il O ~ O 4 ~ N ~ I I - G _ '"~ o ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 6 ' ~ ~ O I I I O I I ' 'r 133.69' ~ I ~ g93s'ZS~~ E °o '` N I o ~ x W ~` ~ E s¢ ~ b ~ f ' .o a o v ^ U to W u N, ! ~ a ;~ ~ '~ w ,' o ~ ~ O O~~~ N M , O 7~ Q " qubu~r"r ~ v~~ q~ F-_JmU G I .. N O v Z~ ~ O ~ O J _ _ w ti ^ O ~ is \ ~ m r-1 /"~ z o I O r; s ~ o° ~ a z ti ~ '? G m a > Ia QU I M ~ ~DO I `a O Q o cq .o O ~i ~ a 1 ~~ w~ ~ Q~ ~~~ zj~l' - ~~a ~~0 1 ~ Q~~ ~ x~';z° w~ ~d Qw~ oz ~ ~ ~~o ~o . ~-~ A9s y i ' `"'7 cil ~ ,9t'¢SF ~ .~SS~ I 4 ~ ~0 9F-Za-!! 9FOd~` ~~~ a li XY1 0 i ~j~ f ' , bMD'IOII'L-r:-N'9E-Gop¢LLp\ ms\pEtlp\[OOZ\abulMVly VM The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #36.11-02-36 to be rezoned from C-2 to R-3. The description is as follows: BEGINNING at Corner #17 located at the intersection of Electric Raad (Virginia Highway Route 4 i 9} and Cove Road (Virginia Secondary Route 780); thence leaving Virginia Highway 419 and with Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N 59° 18' 46" E, 148.84 feet to Comer #18; thence N 40° 45' S0" E, 137.08 feet to Corner #19, the actual paint of BEGINNING; thence continuing with Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N 09° 38' 23" E, 201.81 feet to Corner #20; thence N 17° 19' 42" E, 103.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Cove Road and with the new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36 for the following 3 courses; thence S 80° 14' S0" E, 252.67 feet to a paint; thence with a curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 90° 00' 00", a radius of 120.00 feet, an arc length of 18$.50 feet, a chord of 169,71 feet, and bearing N 54° 45' 10" E to a point; thence N 09° 45' 10" E, 347.20 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly baundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01; thence continuing with said tax parcel, S 72° 48' 44" E, 14,56 feet to Corner #2, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 3611-02-04; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-01.01 and with Tax Parcel 36.11- 02-04, S 07° 04' 26" W, 740.04 feet to Comer #3, said comer located on the westerly boundary ofTax Parcel 36.15-01-01; thence leaving Tax Parce136.11-02-04 and with Tax Parcel 36,15-01-01, S 37° 42' 00" E, 8.33.90 feet to Corner #4, said point being the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.1 S-O1-02; thence leaving Tax parcel 36.1 S-O1-01 and with Tax Parcel 36,1 S-O1-02, S 48° 59' S9" W, 301.96 feet to Corner "A"; thence with the new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-OZ-.36 for the following 21 courses and leaving Tax Par~ce136,15-01-02; thence N 25° 24' 03" W, 49,86 feet to Corner "B"; thence N 00° 04' 02" E, 17.36 feat to Corner "C"; thence N 05° 10' 4S" W, 27.70 feet to Corner "D"; thence N 33° 44' 2.3" W, 11.51 feet to Corner "E"; thence N 86° 25' S1" W, 24.46 feet to Corner "F"; thence N 47° 13' 00" W, 12.97 feet to Corner "G"; thence N 12° 09' 46" W, 17.94 feet to Corner "H" thence N 44° 16' S8" W, 18.99 feet to Corner "I"; theme N .31 ° 31' 45" W, 25.78 feet to Corner "J"; thence N 32° 45' S5" W, 2.3.40 feet to Corner "K"; thence N 54° 43' 48" W, 2.3.99 feet to Corner "L"; thence N 32° .39' 14" W, 34.16 feet to Corner "M"; thence N 34° 35' 40" W, .30.95 feet to Corner "N"; thence N 72° 32' 2G" W, 28.05 feet to Corner "C)"; thence N 52° 54' 46" W, 21.46 feet to Corner "P"; thence N 40° 17' 28" W, 34.99 feet to Corner "Q"; thence N S 1 ° 20' 49" W, 16.3 ,16 feet to Comer "R"; thence N 60° 52' OS" W, 225.23 feet to Corner "5"; thence N 36° 18' 10" W, 176.40 feet to Corner "T"; thence N 18° 58' 08" W, 144.44 feet to Corner "U"; thence N 05° .30' 08" W, 113.00 feet to Corner #19, the actual point of BEGINNING and containing 11,199 acres. L {9Pya•OE•Z•iL OE'GPOCLLO ~ ~ M O [Z N N Q ~ {~ ^O 11 O 0 y ~ - ~m N ~ ~ U ti-. ~ O ¢~ ~ ~~~ ~~CS ~' 1 4 ~ ~m 1 X ~~~ti ~Q~ ~a ~ ~ I q~~W~O~ 9165[ ~sBt:Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ,D96FY' C S F' ~ ai W~ Q C`? O ~99'i! ~~~~U¢¢V w ~ `~ W ~"~z °Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q~m ~~~ a _ ~C ~ i°~ W °' Ln ~a ~ o a z~:: $8$C~~0; O O ANN ~Z.~.. ~ ~ ~ ~rv~NOZ a~ ~~ =~ ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z 1 p a ~ ,19ZSZ ~ ~ 94 fw- ~ a ~ ~-- .~, o '~' 3.0$6LRB & . ~ '~ o o uVi p ~ w ° ~ '/[`.` a i o~ ~ • 9NlM07 C?1 ~ ~ p ~~Nw ,.~ ~ ~~ ~~u U v~ ~ R? Ova ^r ~~ V ao~ ~ I ~ a S6 / u1 V vi ~ ~ O C1i R]..~ M Q @I ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~h ~ ~ - ~ n- _ ~ _J J~~ ~` fl V ~ c,0 -~67a~1,(~` 2 DRS' ~ ` C~2 ~ ~'l. ~ 1 b a c`~3 `~ ~ •~~ ~ z z Jl,,~ ~ ~ ~F ~~~ UUJ N ~ ~ X Y a f 9 m Q ``. QI- ~ ~ ~~ u-,oo ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~N^NNrn p ~ h M of Z s~ ~ QQ ~ ~ C.17 .•~ (/] ~~' (( 3 ~' w ~~ ~t~~ NN Z ~ ~ U P'i ~ ~ 'y' ~N `•~V h NN ~ N `~ze t5 4 O O ~"' Qi ~.7.y O ¢ a ~ ~L m ~~ ~ 1~ al~~/~ o ~ ~ tli C7 7 ~. ~ '~ J O O 7~ ~ '_" ~ ~ ~r-_•-,~ d ~ , ~ (~ p N Y..~..1 N N Q ~ ~ ~~ Q 1GaJ-~ •~..~ ~~ o~ ~ b_ ~ o ~~a ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ i ~ W ~ r o '' W ~ N ~i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I f y~ , I I ~ r OMp~g E-2-lt'BE-9POELto ~{ns~nrtf nvnn r~sOmma ~avm i lga4s'9 E^Z-tl'BL-9o0C1L0 l1~ m0 ate- W Z ~ O cV . ^O Z O ~ O ti F+ ~o p~~ O ~ O o ~ wwith ~ ~ C~ O Z ti ^, O O ~ ~ o ~ U q ~ U W ~~Z D Q ~ ~C~m qs E. m ~ ~ ~ U 0 z !W- D ~ ~ U ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ n a~0 q v V ^z 0 0 P 4 ^ of Lry [!1 ~.. Z ¢ ~ a`U J 6. a m Z o •d ~ 7 ^+ Q Q Q Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ tQ maw N ~yj ~ ~ O ~ E ~~O ~ ~ ~ c.v ~ ~ N W v ~ ~~a rr- o o m cv co ' ~ ~ ~n ~ o o o a ' o cn ~ ~ o m v3 ' ~ U ti . v oa ~ o ~- 4~ c~ o m c~1 iv 0 ~ ~0. U~ Q y tr ~ d n ~-i v vi n a ~ci ry ci ~ Yi ~n rn 4 u~j a a, ci N O 'n ^ ~ ~ a co .r n "'~ ~ o ~.°.~ ~i w er• ^~ ~, ~ O ~ ~-» -_~ r~/ x i~ ' w W 3 W ?~ ~ 3 W ? ~ .-~~ s~ Lu 3. 3 ? 3 W lu W W lu i,a U +~- (/]~~ ~- ~ ~ Z ~ • ~ t is C~ o O L a 4~ n _..~ N ~ F e ~ f ~ tq ~ _ w ~ •W :'7 ' o O is ;'7 i~ t"} D O io ? o V1 " M ni `N <f- m N ry 4 VS 4 I w C/~ r1 C~~ F--1 ~• Op :1' } $J \! '~' a1 :n •- -` I'7 N n 7~ Ct] 1+7 1~ N m ~ ~ ; 7 k 1 :`t b ;`7 lp FBI ~'1 h ;'~ Cf ~" u 1 ~ o~ tl' "1' t tp ~ ~7 ~ ~ q Ln N l. h o n ~ ~ ~ v ~ h ~ ^ CS ~ ~ a d N N ^ N i O 4'1 O Q o~ Q 1~ f~ ~ p "~ N ~G ~ 1n Lr1 1n tn ln cn ~ Z rn v~ ~ z ~ z z z ~ Z ~ z Z Z ^'. II ~~f•Y. m w c\f ~h v ~n ~a n co rn o `r ~ v '~ `~ ^~ w m N M ~ i ~ II~ Z ~ I ~- f N ~ "7 I '~F I h I b I i. ! ~ I g ~ ... I .'- I ~ I ~ f ~ I ~ I ca I h I 4 1 0~ ~ N I N ~y N Q I + ~ ~il *- a; [p ~") t~ O tn ~ ,: ~ tr 1~ rn N d' a~ ln 0} q= af ~0 h lL'i o ~t Mi Q7 of Hi lO .~ Y. G71 a ~ ai ~1" Q1 ~ ~ N ~ ~ 'pp 'V^ ~ ~}. 't ~ p 0 ~ 3 ~,,1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ 3 3 3 X 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Z 1^N~ G • CN7 • ~ • ¢~V e ~ • ~ ^ro ~F a U7 ~ ~ • ~ • tl^ • N • ~ e N • ~ • C • ~ ^ ~ • C ~n ~ pq ~n !'!..~~ m ~ yv~.. ' c.~ rr :`I •r tNv p cN~ ~ o ~~pp u ~ co c`t 4 Q MS 47 `0' 'd~ ~ 7 ^7 ~ ~ M ^ ~S h tp ^7 w. ~ ~ Z ~ 2 Z Z 2 ~ 2 Z 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 ~ z 2 ~ a m c~ b w ~ c~ x = '~ ac ~ ~ z ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~MP'9C•Z iCBC'000C1L0\ me\OC110\1006\s0ule.^~D\++~ 1 =. mini ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,s• ~~ .1 REZONING APPLICATION EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, 1NC. PROFFERED CONDITIONS Petitioner hereby proffers and agrees that if this property is rezoned as requested, the rezoning will be subject to, and petitioner will abide by, the following conditions: AS TO THE AREAS TO BE REZONED TO R-.3: (1) The property will be developed substantially in accordance with the site plan attached to this Application, subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during development plan review. AS TO THE AREA TO BE REZONED TO (:-2: (1) The property will be used only for one or mare of the following purposes, notwithstanding that other uses are permitted in the C-2 zoning district: Residential Uses: Accessory Apartment, Home Occupation-Type I, Multi-Family Dwelling Civic Uses: Administrative Services, Clubs, Cultural Services, Day Care Center, Educational Facilities-College/Llniversity, Educational Facilities-Primary/Secondary, Family L}ay Care Home, Guidance Ser<~ices, Post Office, Public Assembly, Public Parks and Recreational Areas, Safety Services Office Uses: Financial Institutions, General Office, Medical Office, Laboratories Commercial Uses: Antique Shops, Bed and Breakfast, Business Support Services, Business or Trade Schools, Commercial Indoor Entertainment, Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation, Communications Services, Construction Sales and Services, Consumer Repair Services, Hospital, Hote1/MoteUMotor Lodge, Personal Improvement Services, Personal Services, Restaurant-General, Retail Sales, Studio-Fine Arts, Veterinary Hospital/Clinic Uses Requiring a Special Use Permit: Adult Care Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing Home, Religious Assembly, Mini-warehouse (#1!135.2.?-t, 1~9G94-D0001-01) ~- REZONING APPLICATION EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC. LIST OF AD.IOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Tax Map No. Owner & Address .36,.15-01-02 Larry G. and Tda Jane E. Clonner 6012 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 36.15-01-01 Jack C. and Rose L. Garst 5645 Plain View Avenue Roanoke, VA 24019 .36.11-02-17 Jaclc C. and Rose L. Garst 3b.11-02-16 William C. and Stephanie Y. Hill 56.33 Plain View Avenue Roanoke, VA 24019 .3b.11-02-15 Tristan M. Robertson 5619 Plain View Avenue Roanoke, VA 24019 :36.11-02-14 Tristan M. Robertson 36,11-02-13 Colleen M. Coleman 5617 Plain View Avenue Roanoke, VA 24019 .36.11-02-12 James W. Koiner 5607 Plain View Avenue Roanolce, VA 24019 (ri11.22S5Q-1.I096~4-QD~OI-OIJ 35,1.1-02-11 Luther ,1., Jr. and Martha A. Garst 6150 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 36.11-02-10 Luther J., Jr, and Martha A. Garst 36,11-02-09 Luther J., Jr_ and Martha A. Garst 36.11-02-06 Luther .7., ,7r. and Martha A, Garst .36.11-02-OS Steve A, and Debra L. Thomas 204 Cave Road Roanoke, VA 24019 .36.11-O1-I1 GIadys C. Weddle 6215 Cave Road Roanol~e, VA 24019 .36.11-01-10 Ronald G. and Dara Jean Thomas 6231 Cave Road Roanoke, VA 24019 .3611-01-09 Robert G. Ronk G247 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 3G.11-01-OS George H. and Berna C. Franklin 6263 Cave Road Roanoke, VA 24019 (f:1112GS0-1. l09G94-0060!-O1J 2 ~z 4 '`~ ,' ::~. C ~ W E S T E R N V I R G I N I A WATER AUTH~R[Ty September 11, 2007 ENGINEERING SERVICES Re: Availability No: 07- 35fi Address: Cave Road & North Electric Road Tax Map Number(s): 036.11-02-01,a1A1,02,03,04,& 36,00 Prepared by: David Barnhart, Utility Planner (540) 853-1588 Letter prepared without benefit of site plan. Water can be made available by extending the 1 Q inch waterline on Green Ridge Road , service pressure at the point of connection will be approximately 96 PSI. Sewer can be made available by connecting to the 8 inch sewer line that currently lies within the property. Conditions Developer Must Meet When Hiring Outside Contrac#or far Extension • The Developer wilt be responsible for the Hall cast of the design by an engineer licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Developer will be responsible for the cost of the complete construction of the project. • The Developer/Contractor will be responsible for obtaining public easements for all pori;ions of the utility line extension (Authority will prepare and record easement document, but Developer is responsible for preparing easement plat, and acquiring signature of property owner). • The DeveloperlCantractor will be responsible for any necessary utility system appurtenances, HighwaylRight-Of-Way Excavation perrnits (however VDOT band, if required, will be in Authority's name) and any other associated requirements. • A one-year Maintenance Guaranty wi11 he required from the Developer, at the time of Final Acceptance of construction, in the amount of ten-percent (10%) of the cost of construction, • The Developer may be credited a portion (tap to 50%) of the Availability Fees towards the cost of any main extension (up to 10Q% of construction casts) To proceed with service, please follow the steps below: Make Payment to: Roanoke County Administration Center Availability No: 07- 356 Community Development 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA, 24018 Our' Mission is Clear TE1e C°ulter [3uilding 540-853-1588 • 540-853-1 E)17 (fax) • www,westernvawater org Availability Lette- Number t]7- 356 Page 2 of 2 Connection Cost Summary Fees Valid Untif Janua 1, 2009 DescripfiAn Fire (size') Water (size') Sewer (size') Connection Fees Public Service Lines gy Developer By Developer By Developer Main Extension Fees By Developer By Developer By Developer Availability Fees NIA ~ Based on Meter Size Based on Meter Size Vault Fee** Contact (near II Flow Contact Clear Flow NIA Meter Fee Vary Vary NIA Tap Fees {per tap) $400.00"` NIA $250.00 Pavement Repair Fees By Developer By Developer By Developer Sub To#al Fees $00.0© $OD.DD $OD.DD Payment Due $00.0.0 , . ** Developer responsible for payment of vault directly to Glear Flow * Developer furnishes and installs tapping sleeve and valve Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: Edward Rose Properties, Inc. Existing Zoning: R2, C2 Proposed Zoning: R3, C2C Tax Map Number: 036.11-02-01, 01.01, 02, 03, 04, 36 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 31.4 Acres 6 October, 2008 Scale: 1" = 400' N Applicants Name: Edward Rose Properties, Inc. Roanoke County Existing Zoning: R2, C2 Department of ~ Proposed Zoning: R3, C2C Tax Map Number: 036.11-02-01, 01.01, 02, 03, 04, 36 Community Development Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 31.4 Acres 6 October, 2008 Scale: 1" = 400' ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR NIEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA-PION CENTER MEETING DATE: Noverriber 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 15-foot drainage easement recorded by deed of easement, Instrument #200400160, dedicated by Charles R. Simpson, Inc. and Greystoke Partnership, now crossing lots 19, 20 and 21 of Edgefield, Section 2, Subdivision and Matthew Drive, located in the Vinton Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: John Chambliss ~ County Administrator ~~-`~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is the First reading of the proposed ordinance to vacate a 15-foot drainage easement recorded by deed of easement, Instrument #200400160 for Edgefield Subdivision. By deed of easement, Instrument #200400160 on January 6, 2004, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, Charles R. Simpson Inc. and Greystoke Partnership conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County a 15-foot drainage easement extending from Edgefield, Section 1, in a northwestern direction through the remaining property of Charles R. Simpson, Inc., Tract "A-2" (Tax #61.01-01- 02.3) and property of Greystoke Partnership, Tract "B" (Tax #61.01-01-02) towards the existing natural watercourse (shown on attached Exhibit "A"). By plat of Edgefield, Section 2, on August 31, 2004, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, Plat Book 28, Page 45, Charles R. Simpson, Inc. created by said plat, building lots, right of way and a Stormwater Management Easement. The existing 15-foot drainage easement as recorded in instrument #2004000160, is an encumbrance on Lots 19, 20 and 21, a portion of the right of way of Matthew Drive and the Stormwater Management Easement of Edge~Field, Section 2 (shown on attached Exhibit "B"). The petitioners, Charles R. Simpson, Inc., developer and owner of Lot 21 of Edgefield, Section 2, Greystoke Partnership, Sai Xian & Wen Yu Lin Zheng, owner of Lot 20, and Dominick and Selina Emlen, owners of Lot 19, are requesting the Board of Supervisors to vacate a drainage easement as described above, for the following reasons: 1. To remove encumbrance from their properties. 2. In order that Charles R. Simpson, Inc. can move forward with the acceptance of Matthew Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System. Roanoke County Department of Commi.anity Development has determined thatthe above- referenceddrainage easement is no longer necessary due to the plan approval and platting of Edgefield, Section 2, and will not affect the operation and maintenance of the storm drain system associated with Edgefield, Sections 1 & 2. FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with the adoption of this ordinance will be the responsibility of Charles R. Simpson, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the first reading and set the second reading and public hearing for December 2, 2008. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED BY DEED OF EASEMENT, INSTRUMENT #200400160, DEDICATED BY CHARLES R. SIMPSON, INC. AND GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP, NOW CROSSING LOTS 19, 20 AND 21 OF EDGEFIELD, SECTION 2, SUBDIVISION AND MATTHEW DRIVE, LOCATED IN 'fHE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, a 15-foot drainage easement was dedicated to the County of Roanoke by deed of easement, instrument #200400160, from Edgefield subdivision, Section 1, through the property of Charles R. Simpson, Inc., Tax Map # 61.01-01-02.3, and the property of Greystoke Partnership, Tax Map # 61.01-01-02, Tract "A-2" and Tract "B", respectively, as shown on attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, by plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 28, page 45, on August 31, 2004, Charles R. Simpson, Inc., created Edgefield Subdivision, Section 2, consisting of building lots, public street right of way, designated as Matthew Drive, and a stormwater management easement; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid 15-foot drainage easement is a recorded encumbrance on Lots, 19, 20 and 21 of Edgefield Subdivision, Section 2, and underlying Matthew Drive, a public street proposed for acceptance into the Virginia Secondary Road System, all as shown on "Vacate a 15-foot Drainage Easement recorded by Deed of Easement, instrument # 200400160, located in the Vinton Magisterial District", prepared by Roanoke County Department of Community Development, attached as Exhibit "B"; and WHEREAS, 'the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has requested that this easement relocation be accomplished by formal action of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Section 15.2-2272 (2}, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in order to permanently vacate that portion of the easement underlying Matthew Drive so as to permit the proper acceptance of Matthew Drive into the State Secondary Road System; and WHEREAS, this formal board action of vacation will serve to remove potential title questions affeci:ing the property owners of Lots 19, 20 and 21 in Edgefield Subdivision, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the developer and lot owners of Lots 19, 20 and 21, as Petitioners, have requested that, pursuant to §15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the Board of Supervisors o~F Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the exisi:ing 15-foot drainage easement dedicated by instrument # 200400160, as now shown on the attached Exhibits "A" & "B"; and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the Coi.inty and the affected Coi.inty departments; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 11, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 2, 2008. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on November 11, 2008, and a second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on December 2, 2008. 2 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the subject real estate, a 15-foot drainage easement, is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate renders it unavailable for other public use. 3. That the 15-foot drainage easement, being designated and shown as "Vacate a 15-foot Drainage Easement recorded by Deed of Easement, instrument # 200400160, located in the Vinton Magisterial District" on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and having been dedicated by deed of easement for Charles R. Simpson, Inc. and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office by instrument # 200400160, in the Vinton Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to §15.2-2272 of the Code of Virgiriia,1950, as amended. 4. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 5 That the Coi.inty Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as maybe necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That a ceri:ified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). 3 a yx w ~~ - ~\ ~ e ~~ ' FOUNTAIN is LANE CPO / TO STEWARTS a uILLE TO VINTON .~ _ T~ 7~~ ~ M 1~11V1TY lYl.1-]..~ NORTH 15-foot Drainage Easement ~ fio r,4~ ~~ 050 ~ ~~~ G`JG 250E- ~ YJ ~'c^ o ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ® lam", _ `,0~ N ~ N O O O9 ~~ V oy~°~~~ ~, ~ e~ce ~q ~o'~ 40 , q \ 10 ~; +\ P b~ ~ ~ O~ ~~ir F ,~ ~~ ~O DE~ELDPMENTNSHA~L ASSUME THE ~~~ ~ NAINTENANCE RESPDNSI9lLITY OF ~~ ~ THE~STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND OF THE STDRMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY LDCAIED THEREIN, AND . CONTAINED WITHIN, AND CONTAINED © WITHIN AN EASEMENT PROPERLY, ~ ® DEDICATED. a' ~ , s ~ ~ TRACT "A-2" y. o REMAINING PROPERTY 9~~`r~- TAX x`61.01-01-02.3 ~ O W +~ v Ih m h N ti 3 a ('1 U~ n h TRACT=F!° - _~ ~ PROPERTY OF ~ ~ ~~ P,4i37' o ~ TAX x,61.01-01-02 4 v 15.00' NgTURq~ ~greR Cp~S EXHIBIT "A" ROANOKE COUNTY Vacate a 15-foot Drainage Easement recorded by DEPARTMENT OF Deed of Easement, instrument #200400160, COMMUNITX DEVELOPMENT located in the Vinton Magisterial District. / ,~~ r Y O FOUNTAIN tic LAhIE ~~ cpp~ TO STEWAP,TS-' TO VIN TON h `ALLE R~ . _ VICINITY 1l~IAP NORTH ~ e.~ va -u t \ . ' ~, ~ , "8 , +~A~o ~• 44.00' 1L I rRACr "e~ '~ Ac ,~r 11 NI '~ 1Z ~, .. REMAINING PROPERTY OF ~' • ., GREYSTQKE PARTNERSiifP OF VIRG{M,IA r~' • G,9?$~ ~NEw fJ' w.E. f TAX ~ 61.01-0J-02 N 10'39'26"•4~ ~ 3 D.B. f 280, AG. 573 2Q DD ~ rr ~ N 64'S4'SQ~ ~'' ° o ~ sO \ NEW 20' DRAINAGE i I ~ 9 r~ 40.00 ''O ~ ~~•, ACCESS EASEMENT I + NEW JO' ~' •. ° ~o ^ NEW f5' O.E. r' r'I ~ ~ ~ ~ 144. ------ Existing 15-foot Drainage Easement 10.04' ~-' I LQr 21 -- a LOT 20 ~~ - I I G.~62 Ac. 274.44' N2505'10°W ~ 0.269 AG ~ '•. ' I h - I J 4U. 00' N r-'~ S 10 ° E 1 P °i ~ I I N 15175')0" W ~o I 30.40 -•! 4i ~ - 1 ~ NEW STORM WA TER 1 ~ ~ , ~ MANAGEA~fENT ~ i , tOT 19 ~ ~I o ~ 3 ~ W I ~ LLJr 22 EASEMENT 1 0.254 Ar.. ~ ~; a.3s~ Ac ~~ ~ J.795 AC. qy i I j al ~ ~ 1 ^ 1 I S 25275'10' c ~" `;~ a ~ ~ `~ ~ ° ~ ip I 130.00' , I J 40, 00' fi, ~. ~ I I N 25'05'10" W ,f, ~ Q~;~ core ~g~ ~ ; ~« `SLr''o. ~\ ® ~ in ~ a ~ ~ 0.269 AC ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~P ~ -- w I ~ I v ~nl 1 in ~ 'J' ~ ~ r 11 l q ~ ~~T `~ `~ ~~ u, ~ ' N I S 251?5'f Q" W ~ I 0.3E2 aC. N ~`~ ~\ `fa. ~ K I W I J30.00' x ~ ~ ~ •, r + ZI Ll. ~G- t\ `, ~. 'i°~ ~~ o ~ $ V SGT f T t o ~' ' ~ 40. Ga' 1 , ~~\ ~~` '~ ` ~''~ ~ ~ ~ 10.254 AC.. ~ Q S 257 f ~ (i ~ ~ ~ ~ N 75'05'10" W a , .- ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT "B" ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Vacate a 15-foot Drainage Easement recorded by lleed of Easement, instrument #2004001 G0, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-~ ~, ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 11, 2008 Appointments to Committees, Commissions, and Boards Mary V. Brandt, CPS Assistant Deputy Clerk John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Adn-iinistrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Library Board (appointed by district) Lisa Boggess, who represents the Vinton District, has noi:ified Supervisor All:izer ~khat she is no longer a County resident. Her four-year term expires on December 31, 2008. 2. Roanoke County Planning Commission (appointed by district) The four-year term of David Radford, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, will expire on December 31, 2008. Mr. Radford was appointed on November 13, 2007, to complete the unexpired portion of the term left vacate by ~khe death of AI Thomason. 3. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by district) The four-year term of Douglas C. Forbes, Vinton Magisterial District, expired on July 31, 2008. Mr. Forbes is not eligible for reappointment as he has served two consecutive terms. The representative from 'the Catawba Magisterial District has resigned. This four-year term expires on July 31, 2009. 4. Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority The following one-year terms will expire on December 31, 2008: (1) Michael W. Altizer, elected representative; (2) Joseph B. "Butch" Church, alternate elected representative; (3) Jorin M. Chambliss, administrative official; and (4) Diane D. Hyatt, alternate administrative official. 2 ~ !- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADNIINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I-CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 11, 2008 designated as Item I-Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2 inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution establishing a meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for calendar year 2009 2. Request from the schools to accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of $25,000 from the Jobs for Virginia Graduates Program to provide job readiness training and workplace skills training That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution establishing a meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for calendar year 2009 SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County annually establishes a schedule for its meetings. It has been the custom of this Board to schedule its meetings on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month, The attached resolution continues this tradition, except for the months of November and December. Finally, the Board must schedule an organizational meeting for January 2010. Staff recommends that the Board schedule its organizational meeting for Tuesday, January 12, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached resolution. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2009 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That for calendar year 2009, the regular meetings of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are set forth below with public hearings scheduled for 7:00 p.m. unless otherwise advertised. Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, February 24, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, March 24, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, April 14, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, June 9, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, July 14, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, August 11, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, August 25, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, September 8, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, October 27, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Tuesday, December 1, 2009 at 3 p.m. Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. 2. That the organizational meeting for 2010 shall be held on Tuesday, January 12, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. ACTION NO. ITEM N O. -~--- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: November 11, 2008 Request from the schools to accept and appropriate a grani: in the amount of $25,000 from the Jobs for Virginia Graduates Program to provide job readiness training and workplace skills training Roger Johnson, Director Career & Techinical Education. APPROVED BY: John M. Charribliss County Administrator '! COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~s~„~,,~~~,, ~~~~ ~AJ~L '\ '~ ', ~. ~c ,~ ~,y SUMMARY OF INFORMAL"ION: Roanoke County Schools requests that the Board accept and appropriate the following: 1. A grant in the amoi.int of $25,000 from the Jobs for Virginia Graduates Program. The funding will be used to provide job readiness training and workplace skills training for a selected group of student at the Burton Center for the Arts and Technology. Funds will be used to pay part of a current staff member's salary, staff training, and materials necessary to carry out the program. The Virginia Department of Education has notified the Roanoke County School Board that it has been awarded FISCAL IMPACT: 1. Increases the Career and Technical Education budget by $25,000. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of 'the grant funds in the amount of $25,000 for fiscal year 2008-2009. .~ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount of General Fund Revenue Unaudited balance at June 30, 2008 $ 16,743,199 9.51% Balance at November 11, 2008 8.90% ""` $ 16,743,199 Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years. * 2007-08 a range of 8.5%-9.5% of General Fund Revenues 2007-2008 General Fund Revenues $176,033,678 8.5% of General Fund Revenues $14,962,863 9.5% of General Fund Revenues $16,723,199 ** 2008-09 a range of 9.0%-10.0% of General Fund Revenues 2008-2009 General Fund Revenues $188,178,858 9.0% of General Fund Revenues $16,936,097 10.0% of General Fund Revenues $18,817,886 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 9.51 % which met our goal for 2007-2008. The balance will be increased over time to the following ranges: 2008-2009 9.0%-10.0% 2009-2010 9.5%-10.5% 2010-2011 10.0 %-11.0 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator r ~ \ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor Countv Capital Reserve (Projects not in fhe C1P, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Unaudited balance at June 30, 2008 Balance at November 11, 2008 Major Countv Capital Reserve Amount $1,540,757.20 $1, 540, 757.20 (Projects in the C1P, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Unaudited balance at June 30, 2008 Balance at November 11, 2008 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance $2,339,030.00 $2,339,030.00 Approved By John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA From 2008-2009 Original Budget June 24, 2008 Allocation to Art Museum of Western Virginia and Roanoke County Public Schools for Education July 8, 2008 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison August 28, 2008 Appropriation for Development of a Regional Water Supply Plan Balance at November 11, 2008 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance i~~41- Amount $ 300,000.00 (200,000.00) ($24,000.00) ($11,100.00) $ 64,900.00 Approved By John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator ACTION NO. November 11, 2008 AT A REGULAR NIEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADNIINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMIT"fED BY: APPROVED BY: Accounts Paid-October 2008 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance ITEM NO. ~~ - ~` John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 10/03/08 Payroll 10/17/08 Payroll 10/31 /08 Manual Checks Voids Grand Total Direct Deposit $ - 1,165,166.18 1,043,692.40 1,082,752.34 Checks $ - 129,250.05 113,223.76 110,235.86 1,515.02 Total $ 5,511,486.11 1,294,416.23 1,156,916.16 1,192,988.20 1,515.02 $ 9,157,321.72 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION IVO. ITEM NUMBER (rl '_~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATES November 11, 2008. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of October 31, 2008. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: GOVERNMENT: SUNTRUST/ALEXANDER KEY 75,732,001.87 SUNTRUSTlALEXANDER KEY CONTRA 550,927.47 SUNTRUST SECURITIES 8,004,570.70 SUNTRUST SECURITIES CONTRA 67,954.58 84,355,454.62 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION 6,951,990.17 6,951,990.17 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 72,975.06 STELLAR ONE 32,714.15 SUNTRUST/ALEXANDER KEY 6,582,835.22 SUNTRUST SECURITIES 36,229.33 SUNTRUST SWEEP 8,444,570.97 WACHOVIA 45,743.57 15,215,068.30 TOTAL 106, 522, 513.09 11 /05/08 ,I ,,~.` TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX REPORT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Month of Collection Tax Description 2006 2007 2008 January Consumer Utility Tax Landline $ Consumer Utility Tax Wireless Communication Sales and Use Tax E911 Service Tax Cable Franchise fee Total 94,947.90 $ 86,811.94 $ - 116,433.91 123,642.12 - - - 275,569.88 61,427.25 61,676.60 - 240,925.74 237,369.11 85,908.48 513,734.80 509,499.77 361,478.36 February Consumer Utility Tax Landline 93,052.78 11,481 .03 - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 116,093.91 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - - 291,112.62 E911 Service Tax 59,753.00 58,515 .52 - Cable Franchise fee - 36,121 .67 70,725.82 Total 268,899.69 106,118 .22 361,838.44 March Consumer Utility Tax Landline 92,561.36 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 104,178.63 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 207,485 .17 387,479.10 E911 Service Tax 64,339.14 - - Cable Franchise fee - 80,692 .40 98,803.20 Total 261,079.13 288,177 .57 486,282.30 April Consumer Utility Tax Landline 96,802.50 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 128,673.20 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 270,338 .98 317,663.49 E911 Service Tax 60,650.90 - - Cable Franchise fee 216,295.38 75,020 .70 92,881.59 Total 502,421.98 345,359 .68 410,545.08 May Consumer Utility Tax Landline 92,941.49 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 117,319.69 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 271,078 .33 288,110.06 E911 Service Tax 60,264.73 - - Cable Franchise fee - 92,259 .95 96,747.70 Total 270,525.91 363,338 .28 384,857.76 June Consumer Utility Tax Landline 95,748.48 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 119,760.11 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 268,293 .91 287,652.25 E911 Service Tax 60,455.05 - - Cable Franchise fee - 84,186.19 88,081.94 Total 275,963.64 352,480.10 375,734.19 July Consumer Utility Tax Landline Consumer Utility Tax Wireless Communication Sales and Use Tax E911 Service Tax Cable Franchise fee Total 95,017.26 - - 121, 823.44 - - - 300,558.02 287,204.09 59,649.70 - - 245,481.66 78,603.22 97,675.11 521,972.06 379,161.24 384,879.20 August Consumer Utility Tax Landline 92,306.09 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 116,219.46 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 237,729.17 286,202.34 E911 Service Tax 59,979.00 - - Cable Franchise fee - 86,818.45 90,061.68 Total 268,504.55 324,547.62 376,264.02 September Consumer Utility Tax Landline 85,834.51 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 121,460.78 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 258,253.93 263,989.14 E911 Service Tax 59,393.73 - - Cable Franchise fee - 87,629.46 90,094.71 Total 266,689.02 345,883.39 354,083.85 October Consumer Utility Tax Landline Consumer Utility Tax Wireless Communication Sales and Use Tax E911 Service Tax Cable Franchise fee Total 83,920.09 - - 122, 949.21 - - - 349,811.69 246,591.98 58,855.42 - - 226,573.74 87,629.46 95,604.91 492,298.46 437,441.15 342,196.89 November Consumer Utility Tax Landline Consumer Utility Tax Wireless Communication Sales and Use Tax E911 Service Tax Cable Franchise fee Total 84,089.65 - 120,728.15 - - 349, 007.66 59,751.01 - 28,744.85 85,936.15 293,313.66 434,943.81 December Consumer Utility Tax Landline 83,566.76 - - Consumer Utility Tax Wireless 121,724.13 - - Communication Sales and Use Tax - 283,592.07 - E911 Service Tax 60,069.78 - - Cable Franchise fee - 87,478.22 - Total 265,360.67 371,070.29 - Grand Total $ 4,200,763.57 $ 4,258,021.12 $ 3,838,160.09 "Effective 2007 the Cable Franchise Fee is received monthly as compared to quarterly receipts in 2006. "2007 Breakdown provided by the State of Virginia Tax Department Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEET"ING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to provide five-year staffing plan for Fire and Rescue Department SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr. Chief APPROVED BY: John M. Chambliss County Adrriinistrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In light of recent developments concerning the withdrawal of Roanoke City from the Clearbrook station agreement and the opening of the North Coi.anty station, the Fire and Rescue Department welcomes the opportunity to address these immediate concerns as well as projections of staffing needs over the next five years. The department has reviewed statistics, solicited input from the Volunteer Chief of each organiza~l:ion, and developed recommendations consulting the department's senior staff. While the department is confident in the staff need projections for the first three years of the plan, years four and five remain highly dependent on several outside influences including the status of volunteer organizations. We have projected the needs based on trends that we currently observe and on the health of our volunteer agencies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the review of the 5-year plan. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~--~ °~• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEET"ING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to review the changes to the Emergency Operation Plan SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch Fire Chief APPROVED BY: John Chambliss County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Commonwealth of Virginia requires every locality to have and maintain an Emergency Operation Plan (EOP). The emergency management function is assigned under the Fire and Rescue Department for Roanoke County. Fire and Rescue staff will spend a brief period in a work session to explain the general information contained in an EOP and the format now required to comply with 'the Nai:ional Incident Management System (NIMS). The new or revised EOP will be divided up into an Emergency Support Function (ESF) format which assigns broad responsibilities to individual groups or departments for completion of the task. Please note that while no expenses are required to implement this requirement, some grants are potentially in question if the Plan is not adopted. Highlights of the revised plan will be presented to the Board during the work session. The Board will receive copies of the revised plan in its entirety during a future training session. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 11, 2008 Work Session to review development of the Hollins Area Community Plan Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning John Chambliss ~ , _ ~ County Administrator ~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of many months of meetings with Hollins University staff, two comrriuriity meetings, presentations to the Williamson Road Business Association, citizen surveys, cooperation with various agencies and County service departments, and several work sessions with the Planning Commission; a draft of the Hollins Area Plan was submitted to the Planning Corrimission for Public Hearing on October 7, 2008. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the Plan's approval to the Board of Supervisors along with its recommended Future Land Use map (attached). County staff and Hollins University staff will review the draft Plan with the Board of Supervisors at the work session. A public hearing on the draft Plan is also scheduled for November 11. .~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Informai:ion Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~- - I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 11, 2008 Request to adopt the revised Emergency Operation Plan Richard E. Burch Fire Chief John Chambliss County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: W j' 4 1 ~ j ~ } The Commonwealth of Virginia requires every locality to have and maintain an Emergency Operation Plan (EOP). Staff requests that the Board adopt the EOP in the new format in order to comply with National Incident Management (NIMS) requirements as set by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This format allows the County to better interact with state or federal agencies in the event of a large scale emergency as Emergency Support Functions (ESF) are used to assign departments and agencies to accorriplish tasks. A summary of the proposed revisions is attached. FISCAL IMPACT: While no expenses are required to irriplement triis requirement, some grants are potentially in question if the Plan is not adopted. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the revised Emergency Operation Plan 2. Do not adopt the revised Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1: Adoption of the revised Emergency Operations Plan. Roanoke County Emergency Operation Plan Overview • State requires all localities to have Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) in place o Requires adoption every four years, minimum of annual update (used to be live years) o EOP provides broad direction for significant event • New format adopted from federal level in order to comply with National Incident Management System (NiMS) • Previous format: o Each department with individual emergency responsibility had separate section o Occasional overlap or disconnect depending upon situation • New Format (generally the same information/new format) o Basic Plan o Emergency Support Functions (ESF) • County to follow federal accepted 15 separate ESF's • Where we do not specifically provide that function, we assign liaison position to coordinate (example would be ESF-l, Transportation County coordinates with VDOT to ensure roads are passable) • ESF's 1) Transportation 2) Communications 3) Public Works 4) Fire Fighting ~) Emergency Management 6) Mass Care 7) Resources 8) I Iealth and Medical 9) Search and Rescue 10) Hazardous Materials 11) Agricultural and Natural Resources 12) Energy 13) Public Safety and Security 14) Long Term Recovery 15) External Affairs o Incident Specilc Documents o Supporting Specific Documents ACTION NO. "fEM NO. I` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN"fER MEETING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing and adoption of resolution amending the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Hollins Area Plan SUBMITTED BY: Philip "fhompson Deputy Director of Planning APPROVED BY: John Chambliss t, County Administrator ~ i 11 d~.~ 1 ` COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~w ~ 4~~~~~ ~ ~ I j SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of many months of meetings with Hollins University staff, two community meetings, presentations to the Williamson Road Business Association, surveys, cooperation with various agencies and County service departments, and several work sessions with the Planning Commission; a draft of the Hollins Area Plan was submitted to the Planning Commission for Public Hearing on October 7, 2008. The Plaririing Con~imission voted unanimously to recommend the Plan's approval to the Board of Supervisors along with its recommended Future Land Use map (attached). The Plan inventories existing conditions such as environmental resources, cultural resources, land use, zoning, new developments, community facilities (schools, libraries, Hollins University, fire and rescue stations, police, and parks), and in~Frastructure (utility lines and transportation facilities) in the Hollins study area. The Plan also presents the results of three surveys (property owners, Hollins University students, Hollins University faculty and staff). The surveys along with citizen input at community meetings shaped the development of goals and recommendations for the Plan. The Plan presents four alternative future land use scenarios for consideration. Scenarios 2 through 4 show a new proposed category for the comprehensive plan entitled "University". The new "University" designation would apply to the campus of Hollins University and is a future land use area that would guide a n-iix of educational, institutional, limiited commercial, recreational, and open space uses related to a college or university campus. The Planning Commission recommended a modified version of future land use scenario 3. The Plan also identifies implementation strategies dealing with the commercial matching grant program, entrance corridors, greenways, historic resources, maintenance programs, pedestrian amenities, streetscape improvements, transportation improvements, and viewshed conservation to be implemented over the next 15 years. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: Adopt the attached resolution approving and adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan incorporating the Hollins Area Plan. 2. Take no action at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO 'THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCORPORATING THE HOLLINS AREA PLAN WHEREAS, as an update to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Pian, the Hollins Area Plan was commenced in early 2008 to study growth and development issues in the Hollins community; and WHEREAS, in April and July of 2008, community meetings were held to present the project to the citizens and business community, exchange information, receive input, review survey results, present draft goals and proposed Future Land Use Scenarios; and WHEREAS, from March tlu-ough September of 2008, the Planning Commission held monthly work sessions to review and comment on the draft Hollins Area Plan, including a joint work session on April l5 with the Roanoke City Planning Commission, and a special work session on .Iuly 2 to tour the Hollins area. Topics of the work sessions included updates on monthly meetings between County staff and Hollins University administration, overall scope of the study, survey results, discussion of the proposed "University" designation to be added to the Comprehensive Plan, consideration of alternative amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Maps, and goals, objectives and strategies for the Hollins area; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2008, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan incorporating the Hollins Area Plan, after advertisement and notice as required by Section 15,2-2204 of the Code of Virginia; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Planning Commission recommends that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors amend the Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County to incorporate the Hollins Area Plan. A COPY TESTS: ,~~f Rodney McNeil, Chairman Roanoke County Planning Commission C..~ _-_---- Philip T ompson, Secret y Roanoke County Planning Commission AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPT"ING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, INCORPORA"I"ING THE HOLLINS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN WHEREAS, on October 7, 2008, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan incorporating the Hollins Area Community Plan, after advertisement and notice as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, and on October 7, 2008, adopted a resolution recommending that the Board of Supervisors review and adopt a revised Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 2008, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan incorporating the Hollins Area Community Plan, after advertisement and notice as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County, Virginia, has a long and successful history of community planning that has emphasized citizen involvement and participation; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia requires that the Planning Commission of every jurisdiction shall prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical development of their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2229 of the Code of Virginia provides for amendments to the comprehensive plan by the Planning Commission if so directed by the Board of Supervisors; and i WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommended an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County entitled "Hollins Area Plan," and said plan has been prepared in accordance with Sections 15.2-2223, 2224, and 2229 of the Code of Virginia; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVLED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by the adoption of the Hollins Area Plan, including a modified future land use scenario #3 as recommended by the Planning Commission, and incorporating this study into the Plan. 2. That this Resolution is effective from and after November 11, 2008. a DRAFT ~' sew - _~ ~ _ yY Z + l~3yc :~-~ _ ~z •~ ~~ ~~ f+, ~ ~y• X ~ T i till 1 y ~ ~ ~fy ~ s ' ~t~ ~ ~~ ±. _~ .~ 1~ ~ _ liis~:.~ "L~. ~._ -^7H~7 D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Table of Contents INDEX PAGE Graphics and Tables List iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Purpose 1 1.1 Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan 1 1.2 Study Area Boundaries 2 1.3 Planning Process 2 1.4 Plan Adoption 4 1.5 Plan Structure 4 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.0 Environmental Resources 5 2.1 Area History 10 2.2 Land Use 17 2.3 Communittir Facilities 23 CHAPTER 3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3.0 Community Survey 34 3.1 Hollins University Surveys 37 3.2 Community Meetings 39 3.3 Business Community 40 3.4 Hollins University 41 3.5 Planning Commission 41 CHAPTER 4 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.0 Plan Goals 42 4.1 Future Land Use Changes 42 4.2 Zoning Overlays 46 4.3 Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program 47 4.4 Viewshed Conservation 48 4.5 Gateway and Streetscape Improvements 49 4.6 Hollins University Segment of the Tinker Creek Greenway 50 4.7 Transportation Improvements 51 4.8 Funding Sources 52 4.9 Implementation Schedule 53 APPENDICES A Maps I B Documents II Roanoke Countt- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT Index: GRAPHICS AND TABLES CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PAGE FOUND Graphic 1.20 Hollins Study Area within Roanoke Count`- 2 Graphic 1.21 Hollins Study Area 2 Graphic 1.30 Fieldwork Documentation 3 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Graphic 2.01 Carvins Creek 5 Graphic 2.02 Topography on Hollins University campus 6 Graphic 2.06 View of Tinker Mountain and Area Vegetation 8 Graphic 2.07 View of Read Mountain from the Wesleyan Church Property 9 Graphic 2.08 Brushy and Green Ridge Mountains from the Center of the Study Area 9 Graphic 2.10 Botetourt Springs Resort 10 Graphic 2.11 Orib nal Sulphur Spring 10 Graphic 2.12 Relocated Sulphur Spring 10 Graphic 2.13 Springhouse 11 Graphic 2.14 Original Enon Baptist Church 12 Graphic 2.15 Hollins College 12 Graphic 2.16 Aerial Photograph of North Roanoke County 13 Graphic 2.17 William H. Bolster at the Cocke Cemetery 15 Table 2.18 Hollins College Quadrangle District Structures 15 Graphic 2.19 Main Building, Hollins University 16 Graphic 2.20 Green Ridge Cemetery 17 Table 2.21 Roanoke County and Hollins Area 1990 and 2000 Census Summary 17 Table 2.22 Hollins Study Area Existing Land Use Statistics 18 Table 2.23 Property= Ownership by Total Acreage 19 Graphic 2.24 Gander Mountain 19 Table 2.25 Recent Development Applications (Both Land Use and By-Right) 20 Table 2.26 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Statistics 20 Graphic 2.27 Roanoke County Future Land Use Map 21 Table 2.28 Hollins Study Area Zoning Statistics 21 Graphic 2.29 Williamson Road Kroger Existing and Proposed Signs 22 Table 2.30 School Enrollment Figures (3/31/08) 23 Graphic 2.31 Burlington Elementary= School 23 Graphic 2.32 Mountain View ElementaryT School 23 Graphic 2.33 Hollins Library= 24 Graphic 2.34 Hollins University= Campus 24 Graphic 2.35 Walrond Park 25 Graphic 2.36 Hollins Fire Station #5 26 Graphic 2.37 North County Fire and Rescue Station Rendering 27 Table 2.38 Citizen Calls for Service 1 /2006 - 3/2008 27 Table 2.39 Officer-Initiated Calls for Service 1/2006 - 3/2008 27 iii Roanoke CounttT Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Table 2.40 Uniform Crime Report for 2006 and 2007 27 Graphic 2.41 Bicycle Lane along Memorial Drive in Roanoke City 31 Graphic 2.42 Tunnel beneath Williamson Road 31 Table 2.43 VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimates by Route Section 32 2001 - 2006 Table 2.44 Roanoke Counts= Police Department Accident Statistics 1 /2006 - 33 3/2008 Graphic 2.45 Plantation Road Bridge over I-81 Maintenance Work 33 CHAPTER 3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Graphic 3.00 Community= Survey= Gender Results 34 Graphic 3.01 Communits7 Survey Age Results 34 Graphic 3.02 Community- Survey Property Ownership Results 34 Graphic 3.03 Community Survey Longevity= Results 34 Graphic 3.04 Community Survey 50 percent Matching Grant Results 35 Graphic 3.05 Community Survey 66 percent Matching Grant Results 35 Graphic 3.06 Community Survey Matching Grant Improvement Results 36 Graphic 3.07 Community= Survey New Development Results 36 Graphic 3.08 Community Survey New Development "Other" Results 36 Graphic 3.09 Student Survey How Students Leave Campus 37 Graphic 3.10 Student Survey Williamson Road Infrastructure Needs 37 Graphic 3.11 Faculty Survey Age Range 38 Graphic 3.12 Faculty= Survey How Faculty Leaves Campus 38 Graphic 3.13 Faculty Survey Williamson Road Infrastructure Needs 39 Graphic 3.14 Hollins Area Plan April Community Meeting Maps 39 Graphic 3.15 Hollins Area Plan April Community- Meeting Presentation 40 Graphic 3.16 Hollins Area Plan July Community= Meeting Presentation 40 Graphic 3.17 Planning Commission Special Work Session 41 CHAPTER 4 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS Table 4.00 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 1 42 Table 4.01 Hollins Studv Area Future Land Use Scenario 2 43 Table 4.02 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 3 44 Table 4.03 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 4 44 Graphic 4.04 Tinker Mountain 48 Graphic 4.05 Read Mountain 48 Graphic 4.06 Brushy and Green Ridge Mountains 48 Graphic 4.07 Dirt Path along Williamson Road 49 Graphic 4.08 Carvins Cove (viewed from the southwest) 51 Graphic 4.09 Hollywood's Restaurant 51 Table 4.10 VDOT Projected Future Daily Traffic Estimates by Route Section 52 Roanoke Count- Comprehensi`=e Plan November 11, 2008 Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION Hollins Area Plan DKAFT The Hollins communityT, as it is known by its residents, is generally located between Interstate 81 to the north, Botetourt County and Read Mountain to the east, Roanoke Cite to the south and Interstate 581 to the west. Plantation Road (Route 115), Williamson Road (US Route 11) and Peters Creek Road (Route 117) are major thoroughfares that intersect within the Hollins community-. The Hollins community was formerly known as Botetourt Springs which was a prosperous agricultural area during the late 18`h and early 19`h centuries. The accessibility of Hollins to Interstate 81 and Williamson Road fueled its development into a major commercial and industrial area during the mid 20`h century through to today. Currently known as Hollins University, Valley Union Seminary, a coeducational college, was established in the Hollins community in 1842. In 1852, this college became an institution for women and in 1855, the seminary was renamed to Hollins Institute. The school name was changed to Hollins College in 1910, and in 1998, was again renamed to Hollins University. Throughout its histor~T, Hollins University has continued to be a leader in liberal arts educarion. Preservation of this educational institution is an important component of this study as it is a prominent cultural and historical feature in the Hollins community-. 1.0 Purpose The purpose of the Hollins Area Plan is to determine means by which to improve upon the established commercial, industrial, residential and institutional foundations of the Hollins Study Area. To improve the Williamson, Plantation and Peters Creek Road corridors in particular, the appearance of established businesses and infrastructure must be carefully considered. Additionally, new development proposals prompted by significant growth pressures must also be closely reviewed. The Hollins area is a prime location for development and redevelopment due to the close proximit~r of Interstate 81 as well as the location of heavily-traveled US Route 11 (Williamson Road) traversing the Study Area. Several building demolitions have taken place in the last few years to make way for new development. Most of these vacant parcels have not yet been developed. Several vacant commercial and residential buildings are also located in the area. As a result of its prime location, the Hollins area is a community struggling to maintain its historical and agricultural character amidst the expansion of commercial, industrial and institutional uses. Amain recommendation of the Hollins Area Plan is to take cues from existing historic development to be used in rehabilitating and redeveloping older structures as well as in designing new development to create a more cohesive communityT and a sense of place. The Hollins Area Plan was developed by Roanoke Count<T staff in collaboration with Hollins residents and business owners, Hollins University students and staff, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) as well as other organizations and interested parties. This document is intended to serge as a reference and guide for Roanoke Counter officials, developers, business owners and residents when considering future growth and redevelopment opportunities within the Hollins area. 1.1 Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Pursuant to Section 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, Article 3, the Comprehensive Plan, Roanoke County is required to "prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its jurisdiction." The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan states: 1 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 The Roanoke County Community Plan is a bluep~znt fov the future gz oavth and development of the County over the next 70-95 yews. It p~~ovides divection and guidance, fov both the public and pzzvate sectoTS, in making decisions about land development, public se7~ices and T erou~ ce p~ otectiou. The Plan allo~ars decision make,, to study the long-teen consequences of cua~ ent decisions and recognise that today's actions ~arill impact the County for manyyeaT:r to come. Area (which measures about 13,650 acres.) The Hollins Study Area also falls within the Hollins Magisterial District. The limits of the Hollins Study Area include: Interstate 81 to the north; Botetourt Counter to the east; western frontage parcels along Plantation Road to Williamson Road; southern frontage parcels along Williamson Road to the Peters Creek Road intersection; and frontage parcels along Peters Creek This Plan, which is proposed to be adopted into the Roanoke Counter Comprehensive Plan, will aid decision-making for future development in the Hollins Area. This document is the fourth in a series of area and corridor planning studies that aim to provide detailed, area-specific analysis and recommendations for the areas in which they are conducted. 1.2 Study Area Boundaries The Hollins Area Plan Study Area encompasses 728 acres in the northeastern portion of Roanoke County (see Graphic 1.20, Hollins Study Area within Roanoke Count<T.) A larger map showing the location of the Hollins Study Area and the Peters Creek Planning Area is located in Appendix A. The Study Area is located within the Peters Creek Planning Area (shown in purple), one of 12 Roanoke Count- Planning Areas. The Hollins Study Area measures 5.3 percent of the Peters Creek Planning ~.. . - ~, ~, -~, - - .A:; . ~ °~~~ ~~- ` ~ ~ ..{.. s11 ~ _ ~. ~ Giaphic 1.21 Hollins Study Area Road from Williamson Road to Deer Branch Road (see Graphic 1.21, Hollins Study Area.) A larger version of the Hollins Study Area map can be found in Appendix A. All or portions of approximately 350 parcels are included in the Study Area. 1.3 Planning Process 9.3.0 Inventory of Existing Con~'itions Reseaz cb In order to fully understand the challenges and opportunities present in the Hollins Study Area, staff performed an analysis of existing conditions. This inventor~T process involved the collection of information regarding environmental resources, land use and communit~r facilities. The research results on existing conditions can be found in Chapter 2. Mapping In addition to the existing conditions text, several maps graphically represent the research Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 1.20 Hollins Study Area within Roanoke County November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT performed. All maps were created using a Geographic Information System (GIS) manufactured by ESRI called ArcMap. These maps can be found at the end of the document in Appendix A. Field~aro~h To provide an accurate representation of the Hollins Study Area as it looks today, staff spent several weeks in Hollins documenting existing buildings, signs, parking lots, utilities and other aspects of the built environment along the major corridors and on the Hollins University campus. 3-D Model To bring the information gathered through research, mapping and fieldwork together, a 3- Dimensional model was created using the GIS programs ArcMap and ArcScene to graphically represent the Hollins Study Area as it appears today. This model will also be used to show how new development could look in the context of the existing community=. • Longwood University • Lynchburg College • Mary Baldwin College • Randolph College • Roanoke College • Sweet Briar College • Virginia Military Institute • Virginia Tech • Washington and Lee The data and pictures compiled will be used to provide entrance examples for the communityT and Hollins University- to consider. 9.3.2 Co~n~nunity Surrey Communit<r surveys were mailed out in mid- April, 2008, to property owners located within and just outside the Hollins Study Area. The surveys could either be mailed back or completed online. More details and results from the community= survey can be found in Chapter 3. A copy of the survey is located in Appendix B. 9.3.3 Hollins University Surveys Hollins University emailed the student body as well as faculty, staff and administration employees two separate but similar surveys in March, 2008, to gauge thoughts and opinions on a variety of topics. Analysis of these surveys can be found in Chapter 3 and the surveys are included in Appendix B. 9.3.4 Coynrnunity Meetings Two communit~T meetings have been held at Hollins University to invite the public to review and comment on the progress on the Hollins Area Plan. For more information on these meetings, see Chapter 3. 9.3. ~ Inventory of Area Universities Staff visited several Virginia universities with the goal of documenting different campus entrances and amenities. The 11 campuses visited include: • Bridgewater College • James Madison University 9.3.5 Business Particzpation The Williamson Road Area Business Association (WRABA) represents businesses located along Williamson Road in both Roanoke Citcr and Roanoke Count<-. Staff has presented to WRABA twice since the plan inception to encourage county 3 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Graphic.130 Fieldwork Documentation D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 business owners and residents to attend and to provide comments at the community- meetings. Several business owners in the Studv Area who are not affiliated with WRABA also attended the communityT meetings. 7.3.6 Hollins Universi y As Hollins UniversityT is byT far the largest single landowner in the Study= Area, county staff has met regularlyT with Hollins University staff to share information and updates on the progress of the plan. Commission forwarded the Hollins Area Plan to the Board of Supervisors with a favorable recommendation. After receiving the Planning Commission's recommendation, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on November 11, 2008. # citizens spoke in favor of and # citizens spoke against the plan. Concerns noted were ... The Board voted #-# to approve the Hollins Area Plan and to adopt the plan as part of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. 1.5 Plan Structure 7.3.7 Planning Covnvnission The Roanoke County- Planning Commission is tasked with reviewing and refining land use applications and documents, such as the Hollins Area Plan, in their role as an advisory- board to the Board of Supervisors. Staff has periodically updated the Planning Commission on the status of the Hollins Area Plan at its work sessions. A special work session was also held on-site in Hollins on July 2nd, 2008. Staff began reviewing the document with the Commission on August 5`h, 2008. Additional work sessions were held with the Planning Commission on August 19`h, 2008, and September 16`h, 2008, to finalize the draft Plan. 7.3.8 Board of Supervisors Among numerous other duties, the Board of Supervisors decides to approve or deny all land use actions and land use plans. The Board of Supervisors reviewed the draft Hollins Area Plan in November, 2008. 1.4 Plan Adoption The Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Hollins Area Plan on October 7`h, 2008. Staff from Hollins University- attended the public hearing to speak in favor of the Hollins Area Plan, offer their support, and extend their gratitude for the work put into the plan. There were no citizens in attendance to speak for or against the plan. After careful consideration, the Planning The Hollins Area Plan is arranged according to chapters, each covering a different aspect of the plan and/or its development. Following this Introduction, Chapter 2 describes existing conditions in the Hollins Study Area, Chapter 3 documents the community involvement efforts throughout the plan process and Chapter 4 proposes plan recommendations. Relevant graphics, tables and charts are dispersed throughout the plan with maps located at the end in Appendix A. Documents important to the plan can be found in Appendix B. Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Chapter 2: Hollins Area Plan DKAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.0 Environmental Resources 2.0.0 1Yletlanr~s, Foooa'plains, Streams, Creeps ~' Drainage The Hollins Study Area is located in a relatively flat portion of Roanoke CountyT. Areas with little varying topography tjrpically encounter challenges with regards to water management. The main source of surface water is Carvins Creek (see Graphic 2.01, Carvins Creek) which flows through the geographic center of the Study Area. Tinker Creek flows through the extreme southeast corner of the Study Area at the Botetourt County line. 4~ 'r;~ i ~ ~,+I I ~ 4 ~ + ~ --~ ~ _ ,~ .> ~ _~ L'~f~' ~ ~'~ p V _ t r Graphic 2.01 Car~rins Creek Ultimately, all water flowing through the area reaches the Roanoke River, although 95 percent of the Study Area drains to Carvins Creek first with the other 5 percent draining to Tinker Creek. Additionally, just under an acre of the Study Area is classified as being wetlands (ponds), and these areas are concentrated within the northern extent of the Study Area. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the discharge associated with both Carvins and Tinker Creeks flows can result in flooding during significant rain events. Due to this threat, some areas in and around these waterways have been both designated as floodway in the immediate channel, and as being within the 100- year floodplain adjacent to these floodway areas. A small amount of FEMA floodplain is also located near an unnamed creek, outside of the Study Area. See Map 3, Hollins Area Plan Water Features in Appendix A for more detail. All areas located within either floodway or floodplain are subject to more stringent regulations as defined by the County's Zoning Ordinance. The delineation of flood prone areas is derived from the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County prepared by FE~VIA, dated September 29~, 2007, and adopted into the Roanoke CountcT Zoning Ordinance as Section 30-74, Floodplain Overlay (FO) District. Within the Study Area, 77 acres of land immediately adjacent to both Carvins and Tinker Creeks are subject to the FO District regulations as defined within the Roanoke Counter Zoning Ordinance. In the areas designated within this overlay, no structure is allowed to be located, relocated, constructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compliance with the terms and provisions defined in the FO District. Additionall`~, any new development must not adversely affect the capacity of the channels, floodways or any watercourse where the development is proposed. Flowing at approximately the geographic center of the Study Area, Carvins Creek and its associated 727-acre watershed is the dominant hydrologic feature in the area, covering 693 acres of the Study Area. The length of Carvins Creek has been listed on the Commonwealth of Virginia's List of Impaired Waters since 2002 due to violations of the fecal coliform bacteria water quality standard. According to a 2004 report by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DE~ the primar~T cause of this degradation results from urban/suburban runoff within the watershed. Primary sources of this runoff originate from impervious areas within the Study Area such as parking lots and roads. 5 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 From its headwaters in Botetourt County, Tinker Creek briefly crosses the southeastern corner of the Hollins Study Area. The Tinker Creek watershed covers 34.5 acres of the Study Area en route to its confluence with the Roanoke River in Vinton. The length of Tinker Creek has been listed on the Commonwealth of Virginia's List of Impaired Waters since 1996 due to violations of the fecal coliform bacteria water quality standard. is subject to applicable Countjr ordinances addressing erosion and sediment control and steep slopes. The areas designated as steep slopes present greater challenges for developers to overcome regarding land stabilization, access, retaining walls, fill additions and deletions and creating a favorable overall appearance of the development. See Map 5, Hollins Area Plan Slope in Appendix A to view the slopes identified in the Hollins area. 2.0. ~ Topography The topography of the Hollins area generally consists of rolling hills and relativelyT gentle slopes. The predominant topographical feature of the area is the small valley where the Hollins Universit~T campus is situated. From the campus, the topography generally slopes upwards towards Plantation Road to the west and Botetourt County to the east. n: Graphic 2.02 Topography on Hollins Univeisitt~ campus The elevations within the Hollins Study Area vary from 1,026 feet to 1,164 feet above sea level. The lowest point is found where Carvins Creek exits the planning area, near the main entrance to Hollins University at Williamson Road. The highest point is found atop a hill at the bend of Emerald Drive, located to the east of Hollins Universit~r and to the north of Williamson Road. See Map 4, Hollins Area Plan Topography in Appendix A for further information. Few areas exhibit slopes greater than 33 percent; however, within those areas all development 2.0.2 Soil Saiitability Soil surveys provide insight into some of the development constraints likely to be present in an area. Based upon the t5rpe of soil, slope and depth to bedrock, limitations presented by soil profiles can determine what kinds of development are appropriate in a particular area. In the case of Hollins, the entire Study Area is connected to the Western Virginia Water Authority (~X~VWA) for both public water and sewer service, thus reducing the need for septic systems and wells and reducing the chance of those systems failing in unsuitable soils. The soil survey carried out by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 1990 provides definitions of the various t~Tpes of soils within the Hollins Study Area in addition to defining development limitations presented by each. Although the survey can provide more generalized data based on soil tyTpes present, site specific data should be collected at individual properties to determine the limitations presented by soils at those particular locations. Often the limitations can be reduced by incorporating certain technical and design strategies. Within the Study Area, the predominant soil tj~e is Cbilho~arie in the built-up areas surrounding Hollins University. This soil t<-pe is noted as being moderately deep, well drained and slowly permeable. These areas have generally been cleared of trees and serve as a green buffer around the campus in addition to farmland to the west of the campus. Development of these areas is listed as severe by the USDA for the development of structures and roadways due to both Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT the depths to rocks below and the soil classes being variable to shrinking and swelling during periods of drought and flood. The second greatest concentration of soils are classified as U~han Land Codex and Uahan Land, predominately located in the developed areas of the Hollins Universit<r campus, Williamson Road and Plantation Road. These classifications are noted as having a combination of native and fill soils, and are variable with regards to depth, drainage and permeability. These areas have generally been cleared of trees and have been more intensely developed than other parts of the Study Area. Development of these areas is listed as va~zahle by the USDA for the construction of structures and roadways due to the mixture of both native and fill soils. Other significant concentrations of Silty L.~a1n soils are located in the developed areas of both Williamson and Plantarion Roads. This classificarion is also variable with regards to depth, drainage and permeability. These areas have generally been cleared and developed. Any development of these areas is listed as ~node~ate to severe by the USDA for the development of structures and roadways due to both the depths to rocks below in addirion to the soil classes being variable to shrinking and swelling during periods of drought and flood. See Map 6, Hollins Area Plan Soils in Appendix A for more detail on soils in the area. 2.0.3 Karst Topography Karst topography creates landscapes through the breaking down of one or more layers of soluble bedrock, such as limestone or dolomite. Areas of karst can be idenrified by the formation of sinkholes and caves or a relative absence of surface water. Due to both the hazards and limitations presented by karst landscapes, development in these areas should be limited in scope. Within the Hollins Study Area, karst topography is fairly limited in the areas it impacts. Areas of karst are limited to areas south of Williamson Road and to the east of Plantation Road. Current development within these locations is limited with the most intensive development located at the Botetourt County line. The remainder of the Study Area does not feature karst topography; however, sinkholes have occurred just outside the Study Area within Walrond Park. See Map 7, Hollins Area Plan Karst Topography and Features in Appendix A for more information on karst areas. 2.0.4 i~ildlife The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (DGIF~ has conducted inventories of animal species in Virginia and in specific regions. Within a three mile radius of the Hollins Universit<r quadrangle, the Virginia DGIF has listed 532 species likely to be found in local waters, forests and other habitats. Of these, 45 have been placed in one of the following state or federal designarions: federal cayadidate, state endanger ed, state the eateyaed, fede~ al species of conce~ n, state special concern and collection concern. All federal designarions (aside from species of concern) entail a legal status under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). State designarions require permits for collection or activities affecting the species. Additionally, one species found in the vicinity of the Hollins Study Area -the Roanoke Logperch (Perczna Tex) -has been earmarked for elevated status under the ESA due to previously or currently diminishing habitat or numbers. The Roanoke Logperch has been found in Tinker Creek, and is listed as a fedeaally endangered species, the most critical federal level, meaning it is extremely rare and vulnerable to extinction. This designation is more restrictive than those previously mentioned and requires additional safeguards for the safet~r of the species. The Roanoke Logperch is found only in the Roanoke River and Chowan River drainage areas, but it lives predominantly in the Roanoke River and its tributaries. It has been listed as endangered due to a decline in its total population associated with 7 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 increasing pollution and siltation of its habitat Silt is detrimental to the species because it requires clear cool water, unsilted gravel and rubble in order to nest and to avoid predators. dollars. The X20,000 dollar threshold was determined to be the highest average value of a structure that is not considered to be a principal (or main) structure on a property. 2.0.5 Vegetation and Open Space Although the majority of the Hollins Study Area would appear to be highly developed due to its location in an urban environment, there are many open and undeveloped spaces within the interior of the Study Area. Trees and plants are typical of eastern forests and can contain both native and invasive Graphic 2.06 View of Tinker iVlountain and Area Vegetation species. The central portions of the Study Area including the Hollins University campus and the neighboring farmlands are characterized by open fields. The higher elevations are generally wooded, and many of the creeks and streams flowing through the area are buffered by substantial vegetation. See Map 8, Hollins Area Plan Open Space and Tree Cover in Appendix A to see vegetated areas. Although the Hollins Study Area is bound on three sides by major arterials, there are still significant areas of open space located throughout. The total open space acreage within the Study Area is 167 acres, which represents 23 percent of Study Area. This number was derived by combining the total acreages of vacant parcels, open or undeveloped land, open areas on the Hollins University campus and parcels containing structures valued at less than $20,000 The majorityr of the open space within the Study Area is passive in nature. Passive open spaces are recreational spaces that involve a low level of development, such as walking trails and open fields accessible to the general public. These passive spaces are primarily located in the lands surrounding the Hollins University- campus. Active open spaces are more intensely developed parklands and recreational spaces that can include amenities such as playgrounds and athletic fields or courts. The only active open spaces within the Study Area are the County-owned Sadler Park at the Botetourt County line and the recreational fields on the Hollins campus. The largest open space area not held by the Universitjr is the Huffman Farm measuring approximately 63 acres. The remainder of the open space is located in areas off of main arterials and in the yet-to-be developed New Century- Business Park located off of Friendship Lane. See Map 8, Hollins Area Plan Open Space and Tree Cover in Appendix A to see these open spaces. 2.0.6 Viezvrhedr The geographic location of the Hollins Study Area at the northeastern extent of the Roanoke Valley affords scenic views of surrounding ridgelines and mountaintops. Viewsheds are areas that are visible from any particular location, and although not all viewsheds identified in this study are located immediately within the Study Area, the visual aesthetic afforded by these viewsheds adds significant character to the Hollins area. Seven points were selected from throughout the Study Area with each associated viewshed identified and mapped. The locations include: Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT • Sadler Park • Williamson Road near North Brook Drive • East Campus Drive, Hollins Universit<r • Facult<r Avenue, Hollins Universit<~ • Interstate 81 Interchange at Plantation Road • Williamson/Plantation Road Intersection • Peters Creek/Williamson Road Intersection showed that several of them share similar features. See Map 17, Hollins Area Plan Combined Viewsheds in Appendix A to see how the `-iewsheds overlap. See Maps 10 through 16 in Appendix A for the individual viewsheds. Critical viewsheds were identified from these locations and the analysis 9 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.07 View of Read Mountain from the WesleSran Church Propern~ Graphic 2.08 Brushy and Green Ridge Mountains from the Center of the Study l~rea D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 2.1 Area History 2.9.0 Hollins University, Past and Present Botetou~~ Spzzyags Beso~~ Hollins Universit5r began as a resort built around mineral springs in a wooded hollow at the base of Tinker Mountain. In 1820, Charles Johnston of Sandusky (south of Lynchburg) established a hotel and named it Botetourt Springs after the nearby countjr in which he owned land (present Botetourt County.) Mr. Johnston believed that the site of Botetourt Springs was prosperous for a spa, which was a popular commodity in Southwestern Virginia at the time. The resort was also easily accessible due to its location near the turnpike that extended from Washington, D.C. to Tennessee. The resort consisted of a hotel and cottages oriented towards Tinker Mountain. To the northwest of Tinker Mountain was a beautiful waterfall that fed into Carvins Creek which then flowed through the grounds of the resort. Among the guests who were documented as visitors of Botetourt Springs were Andrew Jackson, Henry- Clay and John H.B. Latrobe of Baltimore. While these natural features contributed to picturesque views from Botetourt Springs, the focal points of the resort were numerous mineral springs located on the grounds. Graphic 2.10 Botetourt Springs Hotel (1~~eiderer, 3) The chief limestone spring was located at the corner of the present-day West and Main buildings. The spring was considered to contain "freestone" water which was good for drinking. According to Frances J. Niederer in her book Hollins College: An Illustrated Histo y, a springhouse was constructed at the site of this spring consisting of limestone blocks with hand-hewn roof timbers. It was held to be the spring of William Carvin and is the oldest structure on the Hollins campus. Graphic 2.12 Relocated Sulphur Spring Another spring mentioned byT Frances J. Niederer on the grounds of the resort was the sulphur spring. According to Charles L. Locke on his arrival to the resort in 1846, "one may smell the water at times from 30 to 40 yards of£" For purposes of Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.11 Original Sulphur Spring (1~~eideiei, 14) November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DRAFT promoting each spring, Mr. Johnston would advertise that "hot, cold, and shower baths are provided" at Botetourt Springs. From 1902 to 1917, the Federal Health Department published the results (see Graphic 2.1 in Appendix B) of the analysis of the water in the sulphur spring, noting that the water was "pure and wholesome" with high percentages of calcium bicarbonate, magnesium sulphate and chlorine. The sulphur springhouse was originally built in 1856 and it was later rebuilt in 1960. The sulphur springhouse has been a focal point on the Hollins campus and served as the scene of May Day activities from 1903 to 1966. The spring was eventually relocated in 1985 for the purpose of constructing the Northern Swimming Center. The original limestone spring was piped to its current location in the grassed area near Botetourt Hall (see Graphic 2.13, Springhouse.) The springhouse remains a landmark on the Hollins Universitc- campus. With the emergence of other resorts in the region such as White Sulphur, the popularitcr of Botetourt Springs began to diminish. In 1839, the famous "watering place" dried up, and the Botetourt Springs Resort was closed. Roanoke Female Seminazy In 1839, the Botetourt Springs property was purchased by William Johnston, the nephew of Charles Johnston. At that time William Johnston was serving as Headmaster of a school for girls in Liberty (Bedford), Virginia. William Johnston established the Roanoke Female Seminary at Botetourt Springs, after the newly-chartered County of Roanoke. The school was never successful and only drew about one dozen students. William Johnston never made any changes to the buildings or to the grounds to accommodate an educational facilityT. In 1842 the seminar~T was closed and the debt-ridden property was sold. The Tlalley Uniorz Education Soczety of Virginia The propert~r was acquired in 1842 by a Baptist minister from the State of New York, John Bradley. His plan was to purchase the propert<~ for the purpose of forming an educational society in the Roanoke Valley. Mr. Bradley established the society by May, 1943, and named it Valley Union Education Societe of Virginia. According to Frances Niederer, "this society was chartered on the principle of a joint- stock company, and was to conduct an institution for all denominations." The institution did not prosper under the direction of Reverend Bradley and in 1845 he moved on to iVlissouri. On July 1, 1846, the board of trustees of the Valley Union Education Society hired 26-year-old Charles Lewis Cocke to run the school. The trustees were impressed with Dr. Cocke who was currently serving as a business manager and a teacher at Richmond College. Under the supervision of Dr. Cocke, the school began to prosper. In 1852, the co- educational school was opened to only girls. Dr. Cocke devoted his life "to the higher education of Women in the South." The school continued to flourish, as did the surrounding area. Transportation to and from the area was becoming easier. In the late 1850s the Valley Stage Coach started running two miles away at Cloverdale. By 1852 the Virginia and Tennessee 11 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.13 Springhouse DI~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Railroad was operational with stations at Bonsack and Salem. In addition to the Washington D.C-Tennessee Turnpike, a new road was laid to the southeast of the school grounds. This new turnpike was known as the ` i~VlcAdamized Road" and was laid along the present Williamson Road (US Route 11) corridor. In 1855, the Enon Baptist Church was built across the new turnpike. Many of the commencement ceremonies for the Societ<- were held at this church. Baptisms were conducted in Carvins Creek near the present-dayT location of the highway bridge on Williamson Road. family resided in the Hollins area and are buried in the cemeteryT. Hollins College and Univer:rity Proceeding the death of her father at the age of 45, Miss Matty L. Cocke assumed the role of the President of Hollins Institute. In 1910 the Board of Governors changed the name of the institution to Hollins College. In 1998 the college was renamed Hollins University-. Millstones on Hollins liniveTSity Campus In 1954 a millstone from John Hollins' mill Hollins Institute In 1855, the name of the seminary was changed to Hollins Institute after the names of the first donors, Mr. and Mrs. John Hollins of Lynchburg. The $5,000 donation provided many opportunities for the school. A dormitor~T, East Building, was constructed between 1856 and 1858. The Main Building was begun in 1861. Many of the old cottages built for Botetourt Springs were demolished. The existence of the Institute was difficult throughout the next few decades with an epidemic of tyTphoid fever and the Civil War. Dr. Charles L. Cocke died in 1901 after devoting fifty-five years to Hollins Institute. He is buried in the family graveyard on the hill overlooking the Hollins campus. Generations of Dr. Cocke's on Blackwater Creek in Lynchburg was placed on the front campus with other stones from the old millraces at Carvins Cove and from the Trout farm on Carvins Creek. 2.9. ~ Tin,~erMountain Although Tinker Mountain is located primarily in Botetourt County, it remains a prominent feature of the Hollins communit~r. With such an unusual name, many people in and around the Roanoke Valley have questioned the origin of "Tinker Mountain" and the creek that flows from its base. The most popular theory is the legend of "Old Man Tinker". Legend has it that the old man lived in a cave on the south side of the mountain. He was known as the "The Tinker" because he repaired pots, pans and other items. Rarely did the old man venture Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.15 Hollins College in 1921 (hTeiderei, 91) Graphic 2.14 Enon Baptist Church (Kageyr, 173) November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT into the settlements as he preferred to live alone in the mountain's wilderness. -. ,--~- -..,. ..~ ~ _ .ik•..n r .....- __ _, . `,__ , ~ _ ~~ ,~ Graphic 2.16 1~~orth Roanoke County (I~age~~, 345) 2.9.2 Hollins Stu~'y Area Over the past few centuries the Hollins Study Area has transformed from predominantly rural to suburban or even urban in nature. One means by which to illustrate the development of the area over time is through the analysis of both aerial imagery and construction history. Aerial photographs can be used to provide a general overview of development patterns. For the purposes of this study aerial imagery from 1953, 1979, 1995 and 2006 covering roughly the same geography were evaluated to show these trends. Additionally, building completion dates were also studied to determine more accurately when buildings shown in the photographs were constructed. See Map 18, Hollins Area Plan Aerial Photograph (1953), Map 19, Hollins Area Plan Aerial Photograph (2006) and Map 20, Hollins Area Plan Structures By Year Built in Appendix A for more information. 1860 through 1950 With aerial imagery unavailable prior to 1953, the earliest structures still standing are clustered on and adjacent to the Hollins University campus. With the earliest structures dating to the 1860s, additional structures were constructed on campus through the mid-20`~~ century radiating out from the central quadrangle. By the turn of the 20`rl Century, structures were completed at various farmsites including the present-day Huffman Farm by the 1910s. From the 1920s through 1950, additional homes developed along the Williamson frontage near the University and at the Plantation Road / Williamson Road intersection. 1950s through the 1970.r The 1953 aerial illustrates the Hollins Study Area as being relatively low-densit<r and rural in design and layout. The areas to the north along Plantation Road were all rural in character with farms prevalent. Single family homes were constructed between Peters Creek Road and Plantation Road. From Plantation Road to Botetourt County along Williamson Road and outside of the Hollins campus, development was limited to some commercial uses and scattered single family homes. In general, the area appeared to be rural although in the beginning stages of a transition. It was in this period between the 1950s and 1970s that Interstate 81 was constructed, which prompted construction of several industrial uses along the Plantation Road corridor. ITT and Double Envelope were both completed in the 1950s. The Dominion (now Wachovia) Call Center was constructed in the 1960s and ITT expanded significantly in the 1970s. Additionally, the frontage along Williamson Road also developed into a commercial corridor with multiple restaurants, motels, shops and small-scale office developments. Many of these original buildings still exist today. During this time, development trends accommodated the automobile. All new commercial developments featured paved parking areas in front of the structures reaching to both side property lines with little or no landscaping. Additionally, signs were tall, large and typicallyT mounted on poles. Billboards were also popular and several were erected along Williamson Road. 13 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 By 1979, the Hollins Study Area had transformed from a rural, agricultural area at the fringe of Roanoke City to a suburban community- of its own. The areas to the south of Williamson Road and to the west of Plantation Road had been developed by new homes and subdivisions typical of those constructed throughout the country at this time. 9980s through the 1990.r Through the 1980s and into the 1990s, building data shows additional commercial development primarily at the Peters Creek Road / Williamson Road intersection with the completion of the Market Square North strip center. During this time the Hollins Court and Meadowbrook Village residential subdivisions were also constructed. The character of the area changed again with the widening of both Williamson and Plantation Roads and the realignment of their intersection by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). This project served as a catalyst for further residential development adjacent to the Study Area and continued commercial development along these corridors. Areas along Williamson Road west of the Hollins campus that had historically been residential uses were retrofitted for commercial uses with parking areas built to the sides and rear of the structures. By 1995, additional service retail had developed along the Plantation Road corridor adjacent to Interstate 81. Establishments such as restaurants and gas stations developed in addition to hotels and a continued expansion of the existing industrial businesses. Commercial development also continued along Williamson Road. The Roanoke CountyT Zoning Ordinance was substantially amended in 1992 which tightened existing regulations with regard to signage, landscaping and other development standards. Additionally, the Countyr initiated a Corridor Matching Grant Program in an effort to provide some relief for business owners who lost property during the VDOT road widening project. The program was created to assist business owners in improving the appearance of their buildings and properties. 2000.r By 2006, the intensit5r of development along Plantation Road continued to increase and included additional commercial services. The large-scale Gander Mountain retail development opened in April, 2008, with Tractor Supply Company and Camping World following shortly thereafter. Along built-out Williamson Road, some areas began to see redevelopment. The Roanoke Motor Lodge and Budget Motel were demolished by 2007 leaving large parcels open for redevelopment. With the aging of many properties within the Study Area, continued redevelopment efforts are to be expected. After the adoption of the 1992 Zoning Ordinance amendments and the initiation of the Corridor Matching Grant Program, new development has shown improvements including additional landscaping and the installation of more monument- sty-le signs. With the continual refinement of these ordinances and programs, in addition to changes to VDOT policies requiring greater connectivity and bicycle/pedestrian accommodations, one can expect the future of the Hollins Study Area to continue to transform from an auto-dominated environment to one more focused on the communityr and the pedestrian. 2.9.3 Oral History of the Hollins Area On July 7, 2008, staff conducted an interview with William H. `Bill" Bolster in the Hollins area. Mr. Bolster is the great-great-grandson of Charles Lewis Cocke, the first President of Hollins University. Mr. Bolster provided staff with an oral history- of the evolution of the Hollins area, as well as the genealogy of two prominent families within the Hollins area: the Cockes and the Trouts. Bill Bolster's grandparents, Dr. Hugh Trout and Leonora Cocke, owned the farm where the existing Summerdean subdivision is Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT located, just south of the Hollins Study Area. The name of the development came from Dr. Trout's nickname for his wife, "Dean". A transcript of this interview is located in Appendix B. Graphic 2.17 Gilliam H. `Bill" Bolstei at the Cocke Cemetery 2.7.4 Historic Structures There are several means by which to identify and document historic structures and places. National, state and local historic designations are utilized for this purpose. The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is a program that was initiated in 1966 and is run by the National Park Service under the U.S. Department of the Interior. The properties identified on the NRHP are: • Individual properties nominated by governments, organizations or individuals because of their significance • National Historic Landmarks • Historic areas in the National Park System Roanoke Countjr has seven listings on the NRHP. One of these listings, the Hollins College Quadrangle District, was added in 1974. The Quadrangle District listing includes six structures described in Table 2.18, Hollins College Quadrangle District Structures. The Hollins College Quadrangle District was also listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register (VLR) in 1974. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) manages the VLR `which was also established in 1966 to document Virginia's important historic properties. In the early 1990s DHR conducted architectural surveys for numerous Roanoke County structures. Within and just outside the Hollins Study Area 27 structures or areas were identified and studied by DHR staff. An additional 11 structures were identified by their architectural type (i.e. Bungalow, Foursquare) but were not studied in-depth. See Map 21, Hollins Area Plan Historic Features in Appendix A for more information. Table 2.18 Hollins College Quadrangle District Structures As listed b the National Re ister of Historic Places) Building Name Date Architectural Stile and Constructed Other Information Botetourt Hall 1890 Octagonal brick structure Braclle~ Hall 1890 Romanes ue Charles Cocke 1908 Neo-Classical iVlemo~al Librar~~ East Building 1856-1858 Greek Revival; Considered the most architecturallh significant structure in the com lex 1l~Iain Buildin 1861 l~fixed stiles a%est Btulding 1890 and 1900 Ot'ignally the hotel for the Botetourt Springs resort; Buck wings were added to either end of the structure in 1890 and the original building was demolished in 1900 and replaced b~ the current structure Of the 27 structures or areas studied, 18 are located on the Hollins Universit<T campus in addition to the Hollins College Quadrangle District. Most of these buildings were constructed between 1900 and 1920 in the Classical Revival and Colonial Revival styles and were documented in 1991 as being in good or excellent condition. A building of note is the Springhouse (see Graphic 2.13 on page 11,) built between 1830 and 1850 to serve the Botetourt Springs Resort which operated between 1822 and 1839. This building is the oldest structure on campus 15 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan DI~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 although it has been renovated several times. While these buildings have individual merit, as a collection on a universityT campus already holding a national and state historic district designation, their importance is far greater. The established Hollins College Quadrangle District should be expanded to include as many of the 18 structures identified in the DHR survey as possible. Many of the remaining nine structures studied by DHR are located on Williamson Road. All but five of the structures are located within the Hollins Study Area. It is important to note that since the conclusion of the study in 1992, some of the structures may have been demolished. and propertyT were originally operated as a farm and the Akers House (built between 1820 and 1830) seared as a tenant house. The Gray house is a large American Foursquare with minor Craftsman influence with a mostly original exterior and an intact interior. The Akers House is a Federal-st5rle structure and is one of the earliest houses in Roanoke County with a mostly original exterior, although the interior has been heavily remodeled. Because of the historical significance of these structures, these properties should be considered for nomination to the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places. Other structures of interest include Enon Baptist Church, located at 7971 Williamson Road and constructed in 1855. The church was constructed as the third Baptist church in Roanoke County. A Victorian I-house with an accompanying carriage house is located at 743 Dexter Road and was built between 1890 and 1910 as a summer home for Dr. Trout. Once part of a farm, the house situated at 7790 Lila Drive is a well-maintained American Foursquare constructed between 1900 and 1920. Where groups of historic structures are noted on Map 21, Hollins Area Plan Historic Features in Appendix A, new development in those areas should be respectful and considerate of the established historic character. There are several original uses listed for the nine structures outside of Hollins University. Four were residences or summer homes, two were farms, and the remaining three structures were constructed as a church (Enon Baptist Church, see Graphic 2.14 on page 13), a store and a water supply (Summerdean Springhouse). The current uses have changed slightly as one of the residences became a store (Kay's Cabin owned by Hollins Universit~T), the farms have become residences, and the store and water supply are vacant. The most notable of these nine structures are the Gray Property and the neighboring Akers House, located at 6615 and 6621 Peters Creek Road outside of the Study Area. The Gray house (built about 1891) 2.75 Ceynete~zes As documented in the 2000 study Cultural Expressions of Nature in Sacred Contexts: Documentation of Family ~' Community Cemete~zes in Roanoke County, Virginia by Thomas S. Klatka, Roanoke Regional Preservation Office, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, there are four cemeteries located in and around the Hollins Area Plan Study Area. See Map 20, Hollins Area Plan Historic Features in Appendix A, for cemetery locations. There are three family cemeteries identified in the area. The Mallory-Gordon-Danner cemetery- is identified as small and was vacated or relocated in Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.19 iVlain Building, Hollins University November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT 1997. The Cocke cemetery located on the Hollins 2.2 Land Use University campus (within the Study Area) is 146 years old, is large in size and has at least 85 interments. This well-defined cemeter~T is still active. The last family cemetery-, the Dillard family cemetery, is inactive with five interments and is 158 years old. One church or community cemetery is located in the Study Area. The Green Ridge Baptist Church and Cemetery is large with 113 interments. The cemetery is 104 years old and inactive. The Green Ridge Baptist Church was located in the vicinit~r of the cemetery at one time although it no longer exists. 2.2.0 Demographics The census data for the Hollins Study Area contained in this report was collected from the 2000 United States Census. Although the Hollins Study Area is not neatly defined within census designations, the majoritjr of the population and trends are captured within Block Group (BG) two of Roanoke County Census Tract 302.03 which is located south of Williamson Road. The remainder of the population is located within BG one of Census Tract 302.03 which includes Hollins University and is bound by Botetourt Countjr, Interstate 81, Williamson Road and Plantation Road and BG two of Census Tract 302.05, located west of Plantation Road. See Map 22, Hollins StudyT Area Census Block Groups (2000) in Appendix A to see the locations of the Block Groups described. Since the data was collected in 2000, it is expected that some of this information may differ slightly from current conditions; however, an overview of this data is important as it is the best recent inventor= of demographic and housing information for the Hollins Study Area. Additionally, it should be noted that the data includes Hollins Table 2.21 Roanoke County and Hollins Area 1990 and 2000 Census Summary 1990 2000 Roanoke County and Hollins Area** Roanoke County Hollins Area** Percentage of Roanoke Coun Roanoke County Hollins Area** Percentage of Roanoke Coun Total Po elation 79,332 5,199 6.6% 85,778 5,701 6.7% White/Caucasian 76,520 4,982 6.5% 80,514 5,212 6.5% Black/African-American 2,021 156 7.7% 3,063 332 10.8% Other 791 61 7.7% 2,186 157 7.2% Households 30,355 1,730 5.7% 34,686 2,044 5.9% Families 22,935 1,402 6.1% 24,960 1,563 63% Persons er FamihT (Aveia e 2.96 2.89 -2.4% 2.88 2.83 -1.7% Housin Units 31,689 1,832 5.8% 36,121 2,018 5.6% *~l~Iedian Family Income X53,821 X41,112 -23.6% $56,450 X49,142 -13.0% *i~Iedian Household Income $47,018 $36,678 -22.0% X47,689 $42,374 -11.2% *Per Ca ita Income $21,194 $18,092 -14.6% X24,637 $20,672 -16.1% * Adjusted to reflect inflation in 1999 **Hollins Area includes Census Tract 302.03 (Block Groups 1 and 2) and Census Tract 302.05 (Block Group 2) 17 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.20 Green Ridge Cemeteiy~ D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 University students which can affect the overall numbers. General 2000 Census data for the Hollins Study Area is summarized below. In the table, Household included all of the people who occupy a housing unit. Family represents a householder and one or more people living in the same household who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied as separate living quarters. Pe7° capita income represents average income per person. Additionally, all 1990 income numbers have been adjusted to reflect inflation b~- 2000. In comparison with Roanoke County- as a whole, the Hollins Study Area and its immediate vicinity accounts for approximately 6.5 percent of the total county population. In the ten year period between the 1990 and 2000 Census, the area's total percentages of various populations remained similar in addition to the number of housing units, total households and families within the area. With regards to income, the overall medians when compared to countywide medians are all significantly lower. Student populations typically earn low incomes, which most likely explains the low median income statistics for the area. When adjusted to reflect inflation by 1999, in 1990, both the median family and household incomes were 24 and 22 percent lower than the countywide average. By 2000, this gap had been reduced by half with median family and household incomes being 13 and 11 percent lower than the countywide average. Again, when adjusted to reflect inflation by 1999, in 1990, both the per capita income was 15 percent lower than the countywide average, and by 2000 it was 16 percent lower than the countywide average. The parcels included in this analysis are located entirely or partially within the Hollins Study Area, which accounts for a total acreage count over the 728 acres located within in the Studtir Area. The predominant land use in the Hollins StudyT Area is residential at 53.6 percent, although it is important to note that the main Hollins University parcel (which accounts for 284 acres) is included in the residential calculation. Residential use types include single family dwellings, manufactured homes, mobile homes, patio homes, townhouses, garden apartments and duplexes/triplexes. Commercial uses comprise 10.2 percent of the Study Area which include restaurants, convenience stores, service garages, lounges, day care centers, carwashes, supermarkets, strip shopping centers, banks, medical offices, regular offices and hotels/motels. Industrial uses, light manufacturing, warehousing and truck terminals are included in the industrial designation. 7.4 percent of the Study Area is developed by industrial uses. Institutional uses are schools, churches and homes for the aged. These uses encompass 1.9 percent of the Study Area. Vacant parcels are either completely undeveloped or are developed with unoccupied structures. A significant portion of the Hollins Study Area is listed as vacant at 26.9 percent. See Map 23, Hollins Area Plan Existing Land Use in Appendix A for more information. Table 2.22 Hollins Study Area Existing Land Use Statistics Descriptions Acreage Percentage Residential 411.74 53.6% Commercial 78.46 10.2% Industrial 57.00 7.4% Institutional 14.48 1.9% Vacant 206.37 26.9% Total 768.05 100% 2.2. ~ Existing Land Use Existing land use refers to the current functional use of a parcel of land regardless of the structure type, zoning or future land use designation. 2.2.2 Property Oavnershp Of the 344 parcels located entirely or partially within the Hollins Study Area, there are 210 individual and group property owners. There are 17 Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT Table 2.23 Property Ownership by Total Acreage Raniking Owner Name Common Name/Business Acreage 1 Hollins College (or) University Corp. Hollins University 298 2 Huffman Family (Rati~mond and Hazel, John, Carotin Huffman Farm 63 3 I~TJ LP One Hundred Fifty One Gander Mountain/Camping World/Tractor Supply Commercial Develo ment 33 4 First States Investors Wachovia 31 5 ITT Corporation ITT 29 6 Hollins ihlanor LLC/HCl~ Hollins il~Ianor/HCl~ 16 7 Team Hollins Old Budget ~l~Iotor Lodge Property and portion of Old Roanoke Motor Lod e Pro erty 16 8 Bowers Bowers Property (Iarge residential parcel) 13 9 Autumn Investments LLC Double Envelope 12 10 Peterson Peterson Property (large residential parcel) 12 11 Precision Investment Corporation Sovereign Grace Church/Valley Liquidators and vacant lot 10 12 1~Tew Century Development Corporation LLC New Centui-~~ Industual Park 9 13 Community School Community School 7 14 St Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church St Philip Lutheran Church 7 15 Kaival LLC Da~~s Inn 7 16 North View Park Properties LLC North View Trailer Park 6 17 Williams Williams Property (residential parcels) 5 property owners who own five acres or more of land (see Table 2.23, Property Ownership by Total Acreage above.) The largest property holder is Hollins University- with 298 acres amongst 14 parcels. The second largest property holders are, collectively, four members of the Huffman family. The Huffman property measures 63 acres over seven parcels. The Gander Mountain/Camping World/Tractor Supply Company commercial development, located partially within the Hollins Study Area, covers the third largest ~. S Graphic 2.24 Gander ihlountain acreage amount (33 acres) and is comprised of two parcels. The Wachovia complex is situated on 31 acres and five parcels and is the fourth largest collection of parcels. Next door to Wachovia, ITT is the fifth largest property owner with 29 acres spread over six parcels on both sides of Plantation Road. See Map 24, Hollins Area Plan Property Ownership in Appendix A for more information. 2.2.3 New Developments Several areas of the county are experiencing growth pressures and Hollins is no exception. In the last five years, four land use applications (rezonings or special use permits) located in or immediately adjacent to the Study Area have been approved by the Board of Supervisors. Several other properties have been constructed by-right, which means according to the zoning regulations applicable to the parcel and without any special permission from the Board of Supervisors. The most recent development applications are shown in Table 2.25, Recent Development Applications, below. See Map 25, 19 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Tabl e 2.25 Recent Develo pment Applications (Both Land Use and By-Right) Land Use Old Zoning New Zoning Acreage Ordinance Action District District Affected Date Project Summary Status Designation Designation Rezoning G2 S R-3 C (Medium 8.92 3/28/06 Village at Hollins Ridge was No construction (General Densit~T Residential proposed to have a residential, has begun Commercial Distr7ct with patio-home component off of with an SUP) Conditions) Williamson Road and a retail center fronting on Williamson Road. Special Use R-2 R-2 S 1.264 11/14/06 Proposal to construct 12 No construction Permit (SUP) townhomes on Williamson Road has begun Special Use C-2 (General C-2 (General 38.65 2/27/07 A regional commercial Gander iVlountain Permit (SUP) Commercial) Commercial with development anchored b~ and Tractor Conditions) and an Gander ihlountain. Supply Compan5r SUP (for are open for Recreational business; Vehicle Sales and Camping World Service) is under construction Rezoning I-1 C-2 C (General 2.276 5/27/08 Proposal to construct a Comfort No construction (Industrial) Commercial District Suites hotel has begun with Conditions B5~-right C-2 (General No Change 1.54 n/a Proposal to construct a small No construction Commercial) retail shopping center at has begun il~Ieadowbrook Villa e Under G2 (General No Change 1.98 n/a Proposal to construct a Sleep Inn (Site Plan Under Review Commercial) hotel Review) By-ri ht Under G2 (General No Change 2.14 n/a Proposal to expand the existing (Site Plan Under Review Commercial) Hampton Inn hotel Review) Be-Ri ht Hollins Development Activity and Development Opportunities in Appendix A for more information. 2.2.4 Future Land Use The Future Land Use designation for each property in the County can be found on the Future Land Use Map, which is a component of the Comprehensive Plan. These colored categories indicate the type of development that the community Table 2.26 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Statistics Future Land Use Acreage Percentage Neighborhood Conser-~ration 336.02 50% Pi7ncipalIndusti7al 19430 29% Core 110.02 16% Transition 28.08 4% Total 668.42 100% wants to see in a particular area. Future land use designations are particularly important when properties are proposed for rezoning from one zoning district to another. See Map 26, Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use in Appendix A for more information. Half of the Hollins Study Area is labeled as Neighborhood Conservation (shown in yellow) which is intended to conserve and encourage traditional single-family neighborhoods and uses typically found in residential neighborhoods such as parks, schools and churches. Close to one-third (29 percent) of the Study Area is designated Principal Industrial (purple) on the future land use map. This area is intended for industrial uses and regional employment centers. The Core (red) category, measuring 16 percent of the Study Area, is appropriate for high intensit~~ urban Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT development including general retail shops and personal services, office and institutional uses as well as limited industrial uses. Highway-oriented retail and . ~ -- L ~~- - -,.._~ ,.... -~ . Graphic 2.27 Roanoke County Future Land Use iViap regionally-based shopping facilities can also be located in areas listed as Core. Only a small portion (four percent) of the fourth future land use category, Transition (orange), is present in the Study Area. Properties identified as Transition are intended to serve as a buffer between highways and their associated uses and adjacent lower-intensity development. Typical uses include office, institutional and small-scale retail. 2.2.5 Zoning Districts Table 2.28 Hollins Study Area Zoning Statistics Zoning Districts Acreage Percentage Commercial C-10ffice 274.10 41% C-2 General Commercial 140.34 21% Industrial I-1 Low Intensity Industrial 96.44 14% I-2 High Intensity Industrial 8.75 1% Residential R-1 Low Density Residential 65.24 10% R-2 iVledium Density Residential 51.53 8% R-3 ihledium Densit~T Lhlulti-Family Residential 35.10 5% R-4 High Densit~r Lhlulti-Family Residential 0.01 ° 0 /o Total 671.51 100% Every propertyT in the countST has a zoning classification which determines what kinds of uses are permitted on the propert<T as well as where the building can be located, how tall it can be and other characteristics. See Map 27, Hollins Area Plan Zoning Districts in Appendix A for more information. Per Table 2.28, Hollins Study Area Zoning Statistics, the Hollins Study Area is comprised mostly of commercial and industrial zoning districts. The C-1 Office District zoning is the most prevalent, measuring 274 acres and comprising 41 percent of the Study Area. The C-2 General Commercial District is the second largest at 140 acres and 21 percent of the Study Area. The I-1 Low Intensity Industrial District encompasses 96 acres and 14 percent of the Study Area and the I-2 High Intensit~r Industrial District is small with anine-acre parcel covering one percent of the Study Area. In all, the commercial and industrial districts comprise 77 percent of the Study Area. The remaining Study Area acreage is zoned residentially. The R-1 Low Density Residential District is the largest at 65 acres and 10 percent of the Study Area. The second largest is the R-2 Medium Densit<- Residential District which measures 52 acres and covers eight percent of the Study Area. The R-3 Medium Densitcr Multi-Family Residential District is relatively small at 35 acres and 5 percent of the Study Area. There is also a very small portion of R-4 High DensitST Multi-Family Residential District (0.01 acres). 2.2.6 County Guidelines and Prograyns Coynnae~ cial Co~7zclo~• Matching G~ ant P~ ograyn The purpose of the Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program is to encourage improvements above and beyond current building and zoning requirements to business properties for beautification and economic redevelopment of the highway entrance corridors in Roanoke Count<T. This program is currently in effect in three areas of the count<r: 21 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 • Williamson Road/Hollins Village • Route 11 /460 Westin Salem • Downtown Vinton The Williamson Road Hollins Village Matching Grant Program started in 1994 after Williamson and Plantation Roads were widened by VDOT. Right-of--ways was acquired from many business owners and, in conjunction with the update of the Zoning Ordinance in 1992, site improvements on several properties fell out of conformance with regard to building setbacks, sign setbacks and size, landscaping, parking, and other features. The Matching Grant Program was created to help ease the burden of propert~~ owners who wanted to update their properties to help mitigate the streetscape changes. The basic requirements of the Williamson Road Hollins Village Matching Grant Program are that the subj ect propert<r must be: • Located within the Williamson Road/Hollins Village Corridor • Used commercially= or industrially= (non- residential) • Taxed byT Roanoke County • Certified as having no active Zoning Violations For properties that meet the above requirements, applicants are eligible to receive 50 percent matching reimbursement funds from Roanoke Count- for completion of site improvements that comply with the Williamson Road Hollins Village Design Guidelines. Many= of the projects completed in this corridor have included new signs, additional landscaping and a facade renovation. See Map 28, Williamson Road Hollins Village Corridor Boundar~T in Appendix A to see the limits of this corridor. ... To foster business in the Hollins area by creating an alte7 native to typical comme~ vial st~zp development. By using the local context of the histo?ZC Hollins village as the theme for the community's design; follo~aring traditional visual cues and envia onnaentally sensitive development policzes; and interpreting traditional town planningp~znciples in innovative ways to meet the needs of today, Hollins village should provide a hospitable atmosphere and beautiful setting fo~• contir7ued ~eiaen~al of o~ces and commerce. (f~illiamson Boad Hollins Village Design Guidelines, page G-2~ The components of the Guidelines include sections on architecture of commercial buildings with a heavy emphasis on residential-to-commercial conversions, site planning including site circulation and parking, site amenities such as lighting and signage, and landscape guidelines. Primary uses of the document include guidelines for evaluation of Commercial Corridor Matching Grant applications as well as recommendations for encouraging higher quality rezoning and special use permit applications for properties located within the corridor. 1Villiamson road Hollins Village Design Guidelines The Williamson Road Hollins Village Design Guidelines were created in the early 1990s and revised in 1996. The objective of the document is as follows: Giaphic 2.29 Williamson Road I~rogei Existing and Proposed Signs Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT 2.3 Community Facilities 2.3.0 Schools Public schools serving the Hollins Study Area include Burlington Elementar~T School, Mountain View Elementary School, Northside Middle School and Northside High School. Mountain View is located south of the Study Area on Plantation Circle, Burlington is just outside the Study Area on Peters Creek Road and Northside Middle and Northside High Schools are west of the Study Area off Peters Creek Road across Interstate 581. In regard to the Hollins Study, Mountain View School serves those children residing east of Hollins Universit<r, south of Williamson Road and in very close proximit~r to the Williamson Road / Plantarion Road intersecrion. The Burlington school district covers most of the northern segment of Plantation Road, secondary roads off Plantation approaching Interstate 81 and the area immediately adjacent to the Williamson Road / Peters Creek Road intersecrion. See Map 29, Hollins Area Plan School Districts in Appendix A for more information. Enrollment figures at the four schools as of March 31, 2008, is noted in Table 2.30, School Enrollment Figures. Table 2.30 School Enrollment Figures (3/31/2008) Area Schools Grades Student Total Burlington Elementar-~~ Kindergarten -Grade 5 443 il~Iountain View Elementai-~~ Kindergarten -Grade 5 444 Northside l~fiddle Grade 6 - 8 794 Northside Hi h Grade 9 - 12 983 Recent or ongoing facilitcT improvement projects at Burlington Elementary include a front office renovation and library carpet replacement in 2007 and a security gate installarion in March, 2008. At Mountain View Elementary, work includes excavarion and grounds seeding in April, 2008, and ongoing drainage improvements. Several projects have taken place at Northside Middle School including elevator replacement, football/soccer field expansion, heating/venting/air conditioning, walking track paving, backstop repair, and drainage improvements to the track. All of these improvements were completed from December, 2005, through September, 2007. Ceiling file abatement bids have been extended into the summer of 2008. At Northside High School a broad range of renovations have been ongoing since October, 2007, with renovated areas reoccupied as phases are completed (construcrion may continue through June, 2009). The scope of work includes a new administrative/guidance area, new kitchen and cafeteria, new roof, new heating/venring/air 23 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.31 Burlington ElementarS~ School Graphic 2.32 Mountain View Elementai-~~ School Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 conditioning, public water hookup, new finishes to building interior and exterior, new student lockers, new auditorium, eight additional classrooms, new locker rooms and g~-mnasium air conditioning. special collections and two meeting rooms. The library= also hosts special groups for monthlyT meetings and this location serves as a local voting precinct. 2.3.2 Hollins University Campus Community= School, a private facility= founded in the early 1970s, is located on Williamson Road and offers programs for early learners (3 to 6 years old), elementary pupils (5 to 11 years old) and middle school students (10 to 14 years old). Community School's goal is to provide a learning environment based on "education, innovation and exploration" with an emphasis on art, music, drama and foreign language. As of May, 2008, 162 students attend Community- School. 2.3. ~ Libr~~ies The Hollins Branch Library is located at 6624 Peters Creek Road, just outside the Study Area's southwest boundaryT. Original portions of the Hollins Branch were constructed in 1971. Following additions, it now contains 17,671 square feet and provides a full range of services to North County residents. The Hollins Branch is the largest of the three freestanding (not contained within a county school building) branch libraries in the county system, behind only the headquarters facility in size. General services and programs available at the Hollins branch other than the tjrpical book collections include story times, computers, wireless Internet, office machines, computer classes, book clubs, Author Talks, Family Movie Night, video services, Since its initial establishment in the 1820s as the Botetourt Springs Resort, the area in and around the Hollins University campus has changed significantly. The precursor to Hollins University, the Valley Union Education Society of Virginia was founded in 1842 and the campus has expanded outward from the historic quadrangle since that time. In covering just over 475 acres in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties, Hollins University owns the largest land area in the Study Area at 298 acres. Graphic 2.34 Hollins University= Campus The focal point of the campus is the central quad. Added as part of the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, this area is bounded by Bradley Hall, Botetourt Hall, the Cocke Memorial Building, Main Building, East Building and the West Building. The East and West Buildings in addition to Bradley Hall serve as academic buildings with Botetourt Hall, the Cocke Memorial Building and Main Building serving as space for university- administration and public safety-. The quad serves as a central meeting space and location for guests, students, faculty and staff to interact with one another. See the Hollins University Map in Appendix B for more information. To the east of the quad are academic buildings and residenrial halls; to the west are academic Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 233 Hollins Library November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT buildings and lecture halls in addition to the student center and dining hall. Immediately to the north of the quad are residence halls, athletic and recreational facilities; to the south is the DuPont Chapel and the Robertson Library. The architecture of these structures varies with mostly traditional styles intermixed with contemporary building types. As one gets further from the quad, development becomes less intense and more dispersed. Along Faculty Avenue are multiple single family homes and duplexes utilized as faculty housing. Once beyond this area, the campus opens up into the equestrian area. Within this area are Hollins' riding facilities and stables for their equestrian programs. Additionally, a tunnel beneath Interstate 81 affords riders access to the northern areas of the Hollins property. The need for grazing fields and open space for these programs as well as the rugged terrain will most likely keep these spaces undeveloped. In addition to the open space afforded by the equestrian areas to the north, the campus features many other open space areas. The Beale Garden and the Forest of Arden provide for open space in the central campus areas. Athletic fields and other open fields contribute to the overall character of the campus UniversityT-owned Hollins Apartments where many students reside. 2.3.3 Parks, Kecreation and Toairis~n Within Study Area boundaries, Sadler Park is the only park facility maintained by Roanoke Countjr. Sadler Park is accessed from Reservoir Road, is situated on Emerald Lane and adjoins Botetourt County- on its northeastern property line. Constructed in the early 1990s, Sadler Park includes a playground, a basketball court, lawn area and portable toilets within its 3.39 acres. Single family residential uses surround the park. Graphic 2.35 Walcond Park Access to the campus is directly from Williamson Road at Campus Drive. The remainder of campus is accessed from a series of private roads radiating from a loop road, named East Campus Drive or West Campus Drive. Parking is dispersed in the areas around the quad, with the primary parking areas located to the northwest and northeast of the central areas of campus. Pedestrian accommodations are located throughout the campus. The bulk of the campus is accessed primarily on foot; however, few sidewalks are available along the interior roads. A path along Carvins Creek does exist to allow for pedestrian access beneath Williamson Road to reach the Hollins Close to the Study Area's western limits, construction began on Walrond Park in 1980. Located at 6824 Walrond Drive, its 37.86 acres of previous farmland are situated two blocks west of Plantation Road. An additional 8.81 acres were included later enlarging the park to 46.67 acres. Over time, Walrond Park has become the premier park and recreation facility in northern Roanoke Count<T with a picnic shelter, grills, a cabin, a pond, bathrooms, a water fountain, multiple ballfields, tennis courts, lawn areas and a disc golf course. Activities for kids include tennis lessons and camps, a baseball camp, a football camp, youth art pursuits and a "Pirate's Camp." A driver's safety program and potluck luncheons are offered in the active adult life (55 years old and up) in addition to hatha vo~a. The park 25 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 adjoins single family residential, office and light industrial uses. The 2007-2011 Capital Improvements Program for Walrond Park, Phase III, states that resurfacing and replacing lighting on the upper five tennis courts, expanding parking, paving the upper baseball area parking lot (Enon Drive), developing a perimeter trail system, improving the pond and wetland areas, adding a picnic shelter, improving security= lighting, lighting two soccer fields and improving landscaping are key objectives in addition to replacement lighting for the football/baseball combination field and baseball field #2. Also, the Walrond Cabin which serves as a senior citizen center needs a deck and overall repairs. Capital costs for these items are estimated at $632,000 dollars and improvements are currently deferred. Capital Maintenance Funding has paid for enhancements to the existing restrooms and storage area and will pave the main parking lot. South of the Study Area, Hollins Park is located at 5688 Hollins Road and provides a playground, soccer fields and walking paths on 13.83 acres. This park was constructed in the mid-1980s and adjoins a small office/industrial facility- and single family residential sites. The 2007-2011 Capital Improvements Program notes that the entrance road, two soccer fields and one parking lot are complete and that the North Roanoke Recreation League raised funds and installed lighting for one soccer field. Also planned are a picnic shelter and restroom construction, playground improvements, enhanced landscaping, additional soccer field lighting and paved parking and entrance enhancements. Capital costs are estimated at X410,000 dollars and improvements are currently deferred. Parks, Recreation & Tourism's Master Plan, prepared in 2006, researched, inventoried and made recommendations on all facets of the county's parks and recreation system. A random sample of 5,000 respondent households were asked a range of questions such as identification of facilities visited over the previous 12 months. Of 28 countyr facilities listed, Walrond Park was the third most utilized with 22 percent of users. Hollins Park received a nine percent user rate and Sadler Park was the least utilized with less than one percent of respondents visiting that facility during the one-year period. 2.3.4 Fire c~n~' Kescue Since 1981, the overall Hollins area (several times larger than the Study Area) has been served by Station Number 5, a one-story brick and metal building located at 7401 Barrens Road, occupying 2.51 acres one block north of Peters Creek Road. The 12,244 square-foot, six-bay structure houses two pumpers, three ambulances, one ladder truck and one utility vehicle (used to carry additional staff or equipment). This station provides career personnel coverage 24 hours a day, every day. Volunteer coverage is in place Monday through Thursday from 6:00 pm until 6:00 am and Friday from 6:00 pm until Monday at 6:00 am. See Map 30, Hollins Area Plan Fire and Rescue District Boundaries in Appendix A for more information. Graphic 2.36 Hollins Fire Starion #5 In 2007, Hollins #5 responded to 3,602 total fire and rescue calls, by far the highest incident response rate of any station in the county (approximately 32 percent of the county total). Of the 2007 incident total, 3,031 were rescue requests and 571 responses were fire calls. In 2006, more than 900 calls for assistance in North Countv were answered by other fire and rescue facilities due to the high call volume. The Hollins station is first due to multiple nursing homes, five public schools, Hollins Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT Universit<-, thousands of homes and businesses and handles calls for assistance to motorists on portions of Interstates 581 and 81. Construction of a new North County Fire and Rescue Station began in July, 2008, with completion anticipated within one year. This facility will be primarily responsible for the current Hollins district and will assist as second-due in the majorit<T of the remaining Hollins area. It is anticipated that the new station will handle almost one-third of the Hollins #5 calls. The North County station will be state-of-the- art, including multiple bays for emergency response vehicles and living space for personnel. All ambulances will be Advanced Life Support capable. The station will be located on the south side of Hershberger Road between Plantation Road and Oakland Boulevard. for Count<r Police operations. The Public Safety Building, which also houses Fire and Rescue administration and Information TechnologyT for the count<-, is located approximatelyT 4.5 miles from the Study Area. Table 2.39 Officer-Initiated Calls for Service 1/2006 - 3/2008 Reporting Year Total District 2006 2007 2008 (January - March) 120 1,954 1,553 399 3,877 121 526 377 102 1,004 122 194 118 17 329 207 607 527 84 1,210 211 360 640 147 1,144 212 814 1,118 242 2,163 Total 4,455 4,333 991 9,572 Six Police Reporting Districts exist in the overall Hollins area. Two of those districts, numbered 121 and 122, (see Map 31, Hollins Area Plan Police Reporting District Boundaries Reporting District in Appendix A) cover most of the actual Study Area. Table 2.38 indicates citizen calls for service data in the overall Hollins area from January, 2006, through March, 2008. Table 2.39 indicates Officer-Initiated Calls for Service in the overall Hollins area between JanuaryT, 2006, and March, 2008. As in the previous table, reporting districts 121 and 122 cover the majorit<r of the Study Area. 2.3.5 Police The Roanoke Count- Public Safet<- Building, located at 5925 Cove Road, is the headquarters facility Table 2.3 8 Citizen Calls for Service 1/2006 - 3/2008 Reporting Year Total District 2006 2007 2008 (January - March 120 733 968 258 1,950 121 492 523 130 1,143 122 60 67 24 151 207 544 517 79 1,135 211 298 387 77 761 212 383 378 97 858 Total 2,510 2,840 665 5,925 Table 2..40 Uniform Crime Re ort for 2006 and 2007 Crime Year 2006 2007 A avated Assault 17 9 Arson 3 5 Bur laid' 24 17 Larceny 76 64 Robbeiti- 2 4 Forcible Sex Offense 5 8 Sim le Assault 45 53 Vehicle Theft 12 3 Table 2.40 references the Uniform Crime Report statistics for the overall Hollins area (not broken down by reporting district.) The report indicates offenses noted by category of crime. Note 27 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.37 North County File and Rescue Station Rende~ng Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 that the statistics refer to an area much larger than that covered by the Hollins Area Plan. 2.3.6 Utilities l~ate~~ The Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) is responsible for providing water, sewer and related sereTices for the citizens of Roanoke City and Roanoke Countyr. The Authority was formed by the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on Julys 155, 2004. The WVWA treats and delivers approximately 24 million gallons of drinking water per day for 155,000 citizens in the Roanoke area via 1,000 miles of water mains and 50 pumping stations. In addition to providing drinking water, the Authority maintains 4,000 fire hydrants for emergencies. water mains run from the Carvins Cove Treatment Plant transporting water from the treatment plant under Interstate 81 through the Hollins StudyT Area. One water main provides water for the Study Area while the other water main provides water for the Cites of Roanoke. The WVWA operates and maintains just over 10 miles of water mains within the StudyT Area, representing 0.1% of the overall WVWA system. A water tank is located off Williamson Road in the eastern portion of the Study Area adjacent to Hollins University. A pump station is located on the southwestern corner of the Plantation Road and Williamson Road intersection. There are 48 water hydrants located within the boundaries of the Hollins Study Area, representing over 1% of the hyrdrants operated and maintained by the Authority. One of the primaryT sources of water for the Authorityr is the Carvins Cove reservoir. It is a 12,700- acre reservoir located in the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt north of Interstate 81, nestled between Tinker Mountain and Brushy Mountain. The reservoir serves as a source of water for more than 130,000 WVWA customers and it provides numerous recreational opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley including boating, fishing, hiking biking and horseback riding. The land located above the 1,200-foot elevation is owned and operated by the City- of Roanoke, while the land below this elevation as well as the reservoir is owned and operated byT the WVWA. The Carvins Cove reservoir receives water from an 11,200-acre drainage area (watershed), as well as from two underground tunnels that carryT overflow water from Tinker and Catawba Creeks. At full pond elevation, the reservoir stores 6.4 billion gallons of water. The Carvins Cove Treatment Plant has the capacity of treating 28 million gallons of water every day, but generally treats 11 to 15 gallons of water per day. The plant supplies water to the majority of the City of Roanoke as well as parts of North Roanoke County, including the entire Hollins Study Area. Two Se~z~er~ The Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Facility, operated by the WVWA, serves Roanoke CiteT and Roanoke Counter. Over 37 million gallons of wastewater are treated by the Authority for its 210,000 residents served in the Roanoke area. The Authority maintains and operates 900 miles of sewer gravity mains, over 22,000 manholes, 21 lift stations and 10 miles of force mains in the service area. The WVWA operates and maintains over 7 miles of gravity sewer, 0.07 miles of force main and over 200 manholes within the boundaries of the Hollins Area Plan. Respectively, these figures are representative of 0.8 percent, 0.7 percent and 0.9 percent of the WVWA's overall collection system. Based upon the WVWA's Fiscal Year 2009 budget, there are no upcoming Capital Improvement Projects proposed within the study boundary of the Hollins Area Plan. Hollins Co~nlnunity Development P~ oject The Hollins Community Development Project was a neighborhood improvement effort between Botetourt and Roanoke Counties. The project was initiated in January 1986 and completed in Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DRAFT March 1989. The project area was comprised of 250 acres and included 79 dwellings and 196 residents. Approximately $2.65 million dollars were spent installing water and sewer utilities, upgrading local roadways, developing a neighborhood park (now Sadler Park) and rehabilitating 43 substandard dwellings. Funding was obtained from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development, the Virginia Water Project, Inc., the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Farmer's Home Administration. Both Botetourt and Roanoke Counties contributed nearly $150,000 dollars to the community development proj ect. The following improvements were made within the Hollins community as a result of the Hollins Community Development Project: • 18,581 linear feet of new water line installed • A 205,000 gallon water storage tank was constructed • 19,673 linear feet of new sewer line was installed • 43 housing units were rehabilitated • 3,735 linear feet of roadwayT were improved to VDOT standards • A new 3.5 acre neighborhood park was established (now known as Sadler Park) StozrnzvaterManage~nent The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan defines stormwater management as the planned control of surface water runoff that results from rainfall. The goal of stormwater management is to prevent flooding and pollution and to ensure that development impacts are mitigated by stormwater management facilities and water quality best management practices. The primary concerns of stormwater management are to: 1. iVlinimize the impact of drainage on private property 2. Alleviate existing stormwater problems 3. Manage stormwater discharge control 4. Protect water and stream quality 5. Research potential stormwater management financing methods Numerous local, state and federal regulations influence stormwater management in Roanoke Count<r, such as the Roanoke Count- stormwater Ordinance, the Virginia stormwater Management Handbook, and the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS-4 Permit (# VAR-0400220.) There are only two areas utilizing stormwater management facilities within the Hollins Study Area. One area is located on the corner of Friendship Lane and Garland Circle and the second area is located along the frontage of a parcel on Robertson Lane near the intersection of Williamson Road and Plantation Road. In accordance with the 1997 Roanoke Tlalley Regional StoT~nzvater ManageYnent Plan, the potential for more stormwater management facilities in or around the Study Area is likely as flood events for both existing and developed land use conditions along Carvins Creek are identified ranging from the two-year recurrence interval to the 100-year recurrence interval storms. Elect7zc Electrical service for the Hollins Area Plan is provided by Appalachian Power, a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio. Appalachian Power provides service to approximately one million customers in West Virginia, Virginia and Tennessee. Gas The Roanoke Gas Company provides natural gas and propane to residents within the Hollins Study Area. According to the company, Roanoke Gas serves over 70,000 customers. The Roanoke Gas Company was organized in 1883, one year after Roanoke became a city. In 1950, the Roanoke Gas Company received its certificate from the Federal Power Commission and organized the Roanoke Pipe Line Company to build a 30-mile pipeline from Gala, Virginia to Roanoke. The construction of this pipeline 29 Roanoke CountT Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 was completed in August of 1950, introducing natural gas to homes and businesses in Roanoke. Cable Cable television is available throughout the Hollins Study Area by Cox Communications Inc. and Comcast. Satellite television is available throughout the Study Area through DirectTV and Dish Network. Telephone Verizon and Cox Communications, Inc. provide telephone services to businesses and residences throughout the Hollins Study Area. Inter net High speed Internet service is provided throughout the Hollins Study Area by Cox Communications Inc., Comcast, Verizon and B2X Online. 2.3.7 Transportation Public Transit Bus service is provided by Valley Metro, or the Greater Roanoke Transit Company to Roanoke and portions of Salem, Vinton and Roanoke County-. South of the Hollins Study Area boundary, Valley Metro buses travel from downtown Roanoke to Hershberger Road and Plantation Road where these two thoroughfares leave city limits and venture to Edinburgh Square on a designated route and as far north as Tiny Trail off of Hollins Road on a variable route. In addition to regular fixed route runs, Valley Metro operates bus service to and from Ferrum College, Roanoke College and Hollins University. A companion transit service to Valley Metro is RADAR, or Roanoke Area Dial A Ride, a non- profit organization providing rural bus service throughout the Roanoke Valley for over a quarter century. RADAR's services are designed for physically and mentally disabled and transportation disadvantaged individuals. Although no fixed route system is in place, CORTRAN, or County Of Roanoke Transportation offers curb-to-curb service throughout the county, including limited assistance in boarding and unboarding to Roanoke County residents who are certified as senior citizens (at least 60 years old) or as Americans with Disabilities Act, Paratransit Eligible. CORTRAN operates from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday excluding major holidays and days when county schools are closed due to inclement weather. The cost per trip is $3.50 dollars. The percentage of CORTRAN users residing in the Hollins Study Area is not known. Additionally, RADAR operated a "red line" bus service along Williamson Road and Plantation Road mainly designed to provide transportation from the City- of Roanoke into Roanoke Count<r for employees who worked in the Hollins area. This service was funded by the Job Access & Reverse Commute program and was discontinued due to underutilization after approximately 18 months in early 1997. The Hollins Express is a free shuttle service from the University to Center in the Square in downtown Roanoke, with one stop at Valley View Mall and is available to the general public. Service runs from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight on Fridays and 12:00 noon to 12:00 midnight Saturdays when the university is in session. See Map 32, Bus Routes in Proximityr to Hollins Study Area in Appendix A for more information. Bike~arays In the Bikeavay Plan fo~• the Roanoke Tlalley A~ ea Metropolitan Planning O~gani~ation, a multi-jurisdictional vision for a regional bikeway network was established by the Roanoke Valley Alleghany Regional Commission (RVARC) in August, 2005. The goal of this plan is the establishment of a bikeway network across the Metropolitan Planning Organization (iyIPO) area to provide greater connectivity and to allow for greater bicycle transit in the Valley. Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DRAFT ~~ ,~....~: ~~ Graphic 2.41 Bicycle Lane along Vlemo~al Drive in Roanoke Cirn The Hollins Study Area is the location of one of the "Priorit<r List Corridors" as defined by the bikeway plan, envisioned to run along Plantation Road from Interstate 81 through its intersection with Hollins Road at the Roanoke Cit<T limits. As a priorit<~ listing the Plantation Road alignment is an important foundation for the greater network, and thus will receive priorityT for construction funding as it becomes available. Additionally, several other routes are designated as "Vision List Corridors" around Walrond Park and are viewed as routes to fill in gaps in the overall network. See Map 9, Hollins Area Plan Greenways and Bikeways for the proposed bike routes in Appendix A. Green~arays Greenways are best defined as paths and trails based on natural corridors, canals, abandoned railbeds and other public rights-of--way that serve as recreational amenities. Greenways also enhance and improve connecfivit~r within communities. Originally developed in 1995 and substantially updated in 2007, the Roanoke Tlalley Conceptual Green~aray Plan serves as a guide for greenway development within Roanoke County and across several neighboring jurisdictions. The Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission oversees all planning and implementation of greenways within the Roanoke Valley. In this plan 51 potential greenways are identified along various courses throughout the Valley. The implementation priorities are based on public input, the Greenway Steering Committee and localities within the Valley. Of the potential greenways identified in the original plan, only the Tinker Creek Greenway directly crosses through the Hollins Study Area. Identified as a Priorit~r #2 Greenway, the Tinker Creek Greenway is planned to run 11 miles alongside Tinker Creek from its confluence at the Roanoke River in Roanoke City to its headwaters at Carvins Cove in Botetourt Count<r. The greenwayT will incorporate numerous historic sites along its route and will serve as a direct connection between the Roanoke River Greenway and the existing trail network at Carvins Cove. With a conceptual plan complete in 2000 through the Hollins Study Area, the greenway will parallel Carvins Creek and pass beneath Williamson Road utilizing an existing pathway. From that point, the greenwayT will wind through the western portions of the Hollins University- property- before crossing beneath Interstate 81 en route to Carvins Cove. Hollins University has included the greenway in its master plan and as of the 2007 Greenways Plan Update, this stretch of the greenway should be completed within five to ten years. See Map 9, 31 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.42 Tunnel beneath Williamson Road Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan Greenways and Bikeways for more information in Appendix A. PedestTZan AccoynYnodations arzdA7nenities As part of a fully integrated, multi-modal transportation network, pedestrian accommodations must be made in an effort to promote the mode as a viable transit option. What are considered to be pedestrian amenities can range from sidewalks and greenways to benches and water fountains. At present, the Hollins Study Area is lacking in many of these t~rpes of amenities that would serge to promote pedestrian transit as a viable mode within the Study Area. Currently, just over one mile of sidewalk is in place with the longest continuous stretch located on the southern side of Williamson Road between Plantation Road and Hollins Court at a distance of 3/4 of a mile. A signalized pedestrian crossing is located at Williamson Road and Campus Drive at the entrance to Hollins University. Other amenities include three WRABA refuse bins located at the Williamson/Peters Creek and Williamson/Plantation intersections. See Map 33, Hollins Area Plan Sidewalks and Pedestrian Amenities in Appendix A for more information. T~ a~c Counts The VDOT traffic estimates shown in Table 2.41 identify trends in road usage (Annual Average Daily Traffic or AADT) from 2001 to 2006. For the most part, the traffic counts remain fairly steady with a few exceptions. The segment of Plantation Road between Indian Road and Interstate 81 shows slightly increasing traffic counts by 2,000 trips to 14,000 AADT between 2001 and 2005, although the count drops by 1,000 trips to 13,000 AADT for 2006. Peters Creek Road from Roanoke Cit<r to Williamson Road also shows a 2,000 AADT increase between 2001 and 2006. Two road sections of note are located along Interstate 81. From Interstate 581 to Plantation Road (the length of one exit) the AADT increases from 54,000 to 59,000 AADT (an increase of 8.5 percent) from 2001 to 2006. Surprisingly, from Plantation Road to the Botetourt County Line, the AADT drops over the same timeframe from 53,000 to 48,000 AADT (a reduction of 9.4 percent.) See Map 34, Hollins Area Plan Traffic Counts in Appendix A for more information. Accident Counts Roanoke Count~~ Police Department statistics compiled for 2006, 2007 and the first quarter of 2008 indicate that 229 crashes occurred within and in the vicinity of the Hollins Area Plan study boundaries. The actual Study Area represents less than half of the overall reporting district region. Crash totals for 2006 and 2007 were similar with 99 and 114 reported, respectively. An additional 16 accidents were reported for the period of January through ~-larch of 2008. By street section, 122 accidents occurred on or near Williamson Road with 18 crashes causing personal injury (20 of the 122 crashes happened on Table 2.43 VDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimates by Route Section 2001-2006 Route Section Annual Average Dai ly Traffic Estimates 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Route 11 (Lee Highway) Roanoke City Line to Botetourt Counter Line 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 13,000 14,000 Route 115 (Plantation Road) Cresfland Drive to Route 11 9,600 9,400 11,000 11,000 11,000 9,600 Route 11 to Indian Road 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Indian Road to Interstate 81 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 14,000 13,000 Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) Roanoke Cirn Line to Route 11 19,000 19,000 20,000 20,000 19,000 21,000 Interstate 81 Interstate 581 to Route 115 (Combined Traffic Estimated for 54,000 55,000 56,000 58,000 58,000 59,000 2 Parallel Roads) Route 115 to Botetourt County Line 53,000 53,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 48,000 Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT private propertyT with Williamson Road as the closest street.) 91 accidents were reported on Plantation Road during the 2 1/4 yTear period with personal injuries resulting in 34 of those crashes. The Peters Creek Road / Williamson Road intersection vicinity had 16 crashes reported to the police. The Interstate 81 / Plantation Road interchange saw 9 (nine) accidents over the 27-month period. One fatalityT occurred within the Study Area at the Williamson Road / Sunnybrook Drive intersection. Table 2.44 Roanoke County Police Department Accident Statistics 1/2006 - 3/2008 Accident Location Year Total 2006 2007 2008 (Jan - March Peters Creek Road* 5 9 2 16 Plantation Road 39 48 4 91 Williamson Road 55 57 10 122 Total 99 114 16 229 *Indicates Peters Creek Road ~ Williamson Road Intersection Based on reported data, the Williamson Road / Plantation Road (signalized) intersection had 20 crashes over the 27-month period, the highest rate within area plan boundaries. Other high accident- reported locations included Peters Creek Road / Williamson Road with 16 crashes and Williamson Road / LaMarre Drive where 13 accidents were reported from January-, 2006, through March, 2008. Intestate 89 The bridge over Interstate 81 (I-81) at the northern terminus of Plantation Road (Exit 146) is receiving X1,040,000 dollars in reconstruction improvements. The project will replace the bridge riding surface, is part of routine maintenance and began in April, 2008. Work is expected to be completed by November, 2008. a new access to and from I-81 would be constructed east of the existing ramps proceeding in a northeasterly direction. At least nine properties would be taken to make room for this rebuild. Additionally, a longer, wider bridge would be constructed to service properties north of the interstate (particularly the water plant.) It is not known when or if this project will be completed. Long-binge Tzanspo~~ation Plans The 2005 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan refers to long range (2025) priorities and recommendations for primary- and secondaryT roads in the county. The 1.5 mile segment of Williamson Road from Roanoke's corporate limits to Peters Creek Road (the extreme northern tip of which is within the study boundary) calls for the highway to be four-laned. Also, the 2.2 mile segment of Plantation Road from Roanoke's corporate limits to Williamson Road (the extreme southern tip of which is inside the study boundary) calls for this road to be four-laned. Both road segments are currently two-laned. In 1998, the Virginia Department of Transportation released the InteTState 81 Imp~ovelnent Study detailing proposed changes to right-of--way, cut- and-fill, pavement, and structures that indicated significant alterations to the existing Plantation Road interchange. The plans show that at approximately the Friendship Lane intersection with Plantation Road 33 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Graphic 2.45 Plantation Road Bridge over I-81 iVlaintenance ~~'ork D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Chapter 3: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3.0 Community Survey Staff mailed 507 communityT surveys to propertyT owners located within and adjacent to the Hollins Study Area on April 11th, 2008. Citizens were asked to mail the survey or to complete it online by May 2nd, 2008. A total of 68 surveys were received for a response rate of 13.4 percent. A copy of the Hollins Area Plan Communit<T Survey and the survey results are included in Appendix B. Hollins area surveyed is generally comprised of property owners aged 50 and over (70 percent.) ~~~ Plnwns..,^r 74?~1 ?~„4 ,~. _ . ~, ~~ fi.5 nr nlrlrr ~{'~~" ni~~ ~,cr tea »~~~ l~'fli~~P 1~ tr:.;, Graphic 3.01 Community Survey Age Results The survey covered the following topics: • Demographics • Community Likes and Concerns • Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program • Development Preferences • Infrastructure Improvements • Additional Comments 3. o. o ~e~og~~phz~s The survey respondents were split almost evenly between male (43 percent) and female (41 percent) with 15 percent responding "both" which could indicate couples jointly filling out the survey. Gender I'doA~sa~er ~~~ r~n,3i~ Nalc 43% ~ 51°~ Graphic 3.00 Community Survey Gender Results When asked what age group respondents fit into, 41 percent answered 65 years or older, 29 Over half of the citizens surveyed own a home (65 percent) and one-quarter own businesses (25 percent.) Prnpe rty Type NuAnb:~:er f3~th ~,:. ,., f~LISl F1Ebb ~~~ '~ Nr me 65~5~ Graphic 3.02 Community Survey Property Ownership Results When asked the question, "How long have you owned a business or lived in the Hollins area?" with the exception of 39 percent of respondents answering 20 or more years, the remaining groups How long have yvu owned a business yr lived in the Hollins area? r~.,;,r,;,: er 1 <: >syrs 1il+yrS 25"5 39"•4. s l0yrs 11-2~4f~ 7~]~n~ 15 S~ percent responded 50 to 64 years old and 26 percent Graphic 3.03 Community Survey Longevity Results replied 35 to 49 years old. This data indicates that the Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DRAFT were fairly well split with 15 percent replying 11 to 20 years, 20 percent answering 5 to 10 years and 25 percent responding less than five years. 3.0. ~ Co~n~n7mity Likes and Concerns The next two questions encouraged thoughtful responses using open-ended blank spaces. The full bar charts showing all categorized responses are located in Appendix B. The top five responses to the question "What do ~Tou like most about your communit<r?" included: 1. Convenience/Proximity- (to destinations) 2. Appearance 3. Character 4. Quiet/Peaceful 5. Interstate 81 (close to Interstate, easy access) The five most common answers to the question, "What concerns do you have with respect to your communit<-?" were: 1. Traffic 2. Commercial/Industrial Development 3. Roads/Intersections/Other Transportation 4. Appearance 5. Pedestrian Accommodations 3.0.2 Co~n~nerczal Matching Grant Prograyn In analyzing only the business-owner survey responses, the answers indicated that most owners are: • Male (70 percent) o Female: 25 percent o No answer: 5 percent • 50 years of age or older (80 percent) 0 65 or older: 45 percent 0 50 to 64: 35 percent 0 35 to 49: 15 percent o No answer: 5 percent • Hollins business owners only (85 percent) o Hollins business and homeowners: 15 percent • Hollins business owners for 20 or more years (70 percent) 0 11 to 20 years: 10 percent 0 5 to 10 years: 5 percent o Less than 5 years: 15 percent The Roanoke Countjr Corridor Matching Grant Program was established in the early 1990s to provide a means for business owners to improve the appearance of their businesses and propertyT. The program currently provides 50 percent Count~~ matching funds up to X20,000 dollars for site or building facade improvements. When business owners were asked if they would participate in the 50 percent Matching Grant Program, half did not answer the question, 35 percent answered "yes" and 15 percent replied "no." Wouid you participate in a 50`/n Matehirtg Grant Program? Alo Anse:::: Yeti l ~f, ~s~a Graphic 3.04 Community Sur~~ey 50 percent Matching Grant Results Those answers changed significantly when the matching amount was hypothetically changed to 66 percent matching funds, leaving the business owner paying 33 percent. The number of "yes" responses more than doubled to 75 percent, the "no" responses dropped to five percent and only 20 percent did not answer the question. Would you participate in a 66°'o Matching Grant Program? Nn Ap•~:. r ~~ Yvr, .~~ Graphic 3.05 Community Survey 66 percent Matching Grant Results 35 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 To follow up these questions about the program, business owners were asked what kinds of improvements permitted under the Commercial Matching Grant Program they would consider making. The two most common answers were adding landscaping and updating building facades. The third highest answer was improving lighting, followed by new signage, new site accessories and parking restriping or reconfiguration. What Matching Grant improvements would you consider making? 11 11 10 5 / ~'' .a s n°~\ ~Fa Ito `'~~ Q'~` 8a,, `arc ~6 ~~s` .~d\ P 6J ~ct~ . ~~e ~~ ro~ 4 answered five times. 25 "Other" responses are charted in a separate bar graph. Following the most common "commercial" response for new development, the top three answers under "other" responses include commercial uses such as restaurants/coffee shops, commercial (more specific) and retail. New (Development ""C?ther" Responses ~~ U45 ~.~~ tit 4gfi `~v, Kati ~Tk ~: S'c ~ 4-~ 2 ~~` Jy zc r`A ~~ ~a 4Q' Graphic 3.08 Community Survey New Development "Other" Results Graphic 3.06 Community Survey iViatching Grant Improvements Results 3.0.3 Development Preferences Responses to the question, "What kinds of new development would you like to see in the Hollins area?" included "commercial" 37 times, followed by "residential" checked 26 times and "industrial" What kinds of new development vuould you like to see in the Htsllins area? 37 ~~ ?S 14 s C.nnnnQrciel ~PSIf~POM~dI Inslustrial Wrmr Olh~r Graphic 3.07 Communing Survey New Development Results 3.0.4 InfrastructT~re Improvements Survey respondents were also asked about infrastructure along the main corridors. The full bar charts showing all answers to both questions including categorized "other" responses are located in Appendix B. The top five responses to the question "What kinds of improvements would you like to see along Williamson and Peters Creek Roads" included: 1. Underground utilities 2. Communit<- signs 3. Street trees 4. Landscaped medians 5. Sidewalks The five most common answers to the question, "What kinds of improvements would you like to see along Williamson and Peters Creek Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT Roads?" were the same as the answers for Williamson and Peters Creek Roads, although in a different order: 1. Street trees 2. Underground utilities 3. Landscaped medians 4. Sidewalks 5. Community signs 3.0.5 A~l~litional Co~vnents Several people included additional comments at the end of the surveyT in open-ended blank spaces. See Appendix B for the full bar chart showing all categorized responses. When categorized, the most common five answers concerned: 1. Road, intersection or other transportation issues 2. Commercial development 3. iVliscellaneous comments 4. Appearance 5. Hollins University The results of the survey= were posted for the public on the Roanoke Count<T Community Development webpage. 83 percent of students responded that theyT are between 17 and 25 years of age and 74 percent live on-campus. When asked how they leave campus, the majority (86 percent) answered that they drive although only= 71 percent have cars. 37 percent walk, 26 percent use the Hollins Shuttle which runs on the weekends only, eight percent take a taxi and seven percent ride a bicycle. 67 percent of students answered that they= would use public transportation (bus or train) to reach their destinations if there was a stop at Hollins Universit<r. When you leave campus, how do you get to your destination? 8L-°• 37Y~ zU~c s~ ~~~ ~°% ~ ~ ~ 6rive ~Nalk H+~Illns Tail 6lcyele Other s,~au~e Graphic 3.09 Student Survey How Students Leave Campus 3.1 Hollins University Surveys In addition to the CommunityT Sure-eyT, Hollins Universit<r also conducted a survey with their students and faculty/staff in March, 2008. The surveys were offered through Survey Monkey, an online sere-ice. The questions covered topics such as demographics, transportation means, Williamson Road infrastructure improvement, destinations and new businesses desired in the area. With the exception of modifications to a few demographics questions, the questions were identical in both the student and faculty/staff surveys. 3.7.0 Student Survey An e-mail was sent to 799 Hollins University students (undergraduate, graduate and Horizon) requesting participation in the survey. 248 students answered the survey for a response rate of 31.0 percent. Students also answered questions about walking along Williamson Road. 44 percent of students walk to nearby destinations along Williamson and most of those students requested better sidewalks (86 percent,) better crosswalks (85 percent) and better lighting (85 percent.) Williamson Road infrastructure needs according to walkers 86% 85% 85v ~~ i. Better BeCfer BeCtier _ightln; Othei° Sidewalks Crosswalks Graphic 3.10 Student Survey Williamson Road Infrastructure Needs 37 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 There are no bicycle lanes provided in the eicinit<T of Hollins UniversityT. When bicycle riders were asked if they ride their bikes on area roads, 47 percent responded yes. To follow up on that question, bicycle riders were asked if they would ride their bikes if bicycle lanes were provided. Most of the respondents answered yes (87 percent.) Students were also asked questions about the kinds of places that they go. The top five destinations included: 1. Grocery Store/Drug Store 2. Restaurants/Coffee Shops 3. Shopping Centers/Malls 4. Movie Theaters/Bowling/Other Entertainment 5. Doctors/Healthcare When asked "What is your favorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley?" the top five responses were: The age range for the facultjT, staff and administration employees was distributed much more equally than the age range of the students with seven percent between 21 and 30, 25 percent between 31 and 40, 28 percent between 41 and 50 and 38 percent over 51 years of age. What is your age range? F'rcFcr not ~~ ?1-zs z6 ao ~4L ~9v 546 5Gand over ~ 31-3~ Z~~ 17°~ ;f-4f1 1Sr sl-ss ~~- 41-45 46-SCE lc~u 14'%5 1. Downtown 2. Shopping Centers/Malls 3. Parks/Trails/Recreation/Exercise 4. Restaurants 5. Mill Mountain Star The top five answers to "What kinds of businesses would you like to see in the Hollins University- area" included: 1. Restaurants 2. Retail 3. Entertainment 4. Coffee Shops 5. Grocer~T Stores/Drug Stores The survey as well as the full set of Hollins University Student Survey results are located in Appendix B. 3. ~. ~ Faculty Survey All 377 Hollins University facult<-, staff and administration employees also received a survey. 118 surveys were completed totaling a 31.3 percent response rate. Graphic 3.11 Faculty Survey Age Range When asked how they leave campus, almost all respondents drive (97 percent,) 19 percent walk and three percent ride bicycles. Accordingly, 98 percent of respondents have cars. When asked if they would ride public transportation if it was available with a stop at Hollins Universit~r, 48 percent responded yes. When you leave campus, how do you getto your destination? ~~,: i 9"i iy , ,cr .ter f]rive }5'alk r~icp~:lt^ Tarsi i71h,~r Graphic 3.12 Faculty Survey How Faculty Leaves Campus 32 percent of respondents answered that they walk along Williamson Road. Of those walkers, 84 percent requested better crosswalks and better Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT sidewalks and 61 percent requested better lighting for pedestrians. To view the Faculty/Staff/Administration employees survey and full survey results, see Appendix B. Williamson Road infrastructure needs accardingto walkers R~ ~ S~s~ tr~~ rs a .'` ~ ' f1riirr firttrr fart Cyr lighting i7thzr Croassty 7lks .Sirlr~.valks Graphic 3.13 Faculty Survey ~X1illiamson Road Infrastructure Needs When bicycle riders were asked if they ride their bikes on area roads, 61 percent responded yes. 93 percent answered that they would use bike lanes, if provided, to ride to their destinations. The top five answers to the question, "When you leave campus, what kinds of places do y=ou go (other than home or work?) included: 1. Grocery Stores/Drug Stores 2. Restaurants/Coffee Shops 3. Shopping Centers/Malls 4. Parks/Trails/Recreation 5. Personal Services (Beauty Salon, Nail Salon, Tanning) When asked "What is your favorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley" respondents answered: 1. Downtown/CityT Market 2. Parks/Trails/Recreation 3. Grandin Village 4. Restaurants 5. Blue Ridge Parkway The Hollins University- Faculty-, Staff and Administration employees also had several requests with regard to new businesses in the area: 1. Restaurants 2. Other Retail 3. Coffee Shops 4. Grocery Stores 5. Movies/Bowling/Other Entertainment 3.2 Community Meetings 3.2.0 April Corn unity Meeting A series of Community Meetings were held on April 28`x, 2008, at the Ballatore Gallery in the Moody Student Center at Hollins University. For the convenience of residents and business owners, the meetings were held at three different times throughout the day (9:OOam, 2:OOpm and 7:OOpm.) 507 property owners located within and adjacent to the Study Area were mailed notices with information about the community- meetings. Approximately- 28 citizens attended the meetings. Graphic 3.14 Hollins Area Plan April Community Meeting Maps Several maps were set up in three different groupings (HistoryT, Environment and Land Use/Development) with a blank flipchart provided at each for citizens to write comments and questions. Staff presented an overview of the Hollins Area Plan study outlining the following: 39 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 • Study Area boundaries • Hollins area demographics • Development pressures • Possible Plan components o Streetscape Improvement Plans o Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program changes o Williamson Road Hollins Village Design Guidelines changes o Hollins University Historic District o Viewshed Conservation Plan o Zoning Overlays • Planning Process o Hollins University- Student and Facultti- Survey synopses o Ongoing tasks o Future tasks 3.2Steps for Plan adoption Upon conclusion of the presentation, staff answered questions and received comments. Comments and questions received included primarily transportation and development questions as well as environmental concerns. See Appendix B for further details regarding citizen questions and concerns. 3.2. ~ July Co~nynunity Meeting The second Community- Meeting was held on July 31s`, 2008, at 7:OOpm at the Ballator Gallery in the Moodv Student Center at Hollins University. A total of 515 notices were mailed to property owners within and adjacent to the Hollins Study Area as well as to attendees from the first communitcT meetings. Approximately 21 people attended the meeting. Staff gave a presentation outlining the draft Hollins Area Plan with emphasis on the Communit<- Survey results and four Future Land Use scenarios. A three- dimensional computer model of the Hollins Study Area was also shown. Questions and concerns raised at the conclusion of the meeting included several VDOT-related topics, implementation of the Hollins Area Plan, business attraction and taxes. See Appendix B for additional details. 3.3 Business Community 3.3.0 i~illia~son Koad Area Business Association On April 15`h, 2008, staff presented an overview of the Hollins Area Plan to the members of the Williamson Road Area Business Association (WRABA) at their monthly meeting. Staff also invited WRABA members to the April 28`h, 2008, Community Meeting, answered questions and received comments. WRABA members were mainly concerned with zoning and future land uses in the Hollins area and how the plan would affect existing businesses. At the July 15`h, 2008 WR_~yBA meeting, staff also invited members to attend the July 31s`, 2008, C Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 3.16 Hollins Area Plan July Communityr 1hleeting Presentation Graphic 3.15 Hollins Area Plan April Communit~r iVleeting Presentation November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT 3.3. ~ Local Ke~ltors 3S. ~ Speczal Phnning Co~~nission 1YIor,~ Session Since the first meeting notice was mailed to propertyT owners staff has received phone calls from realtors inquiring about the Hollins Area Plan and its potential effects on properties listed within the Study Area. Staff also met with two realtors in early Mav to discuss the Hollins Area Plan and the parcels they had listed for sale. 3.4 Hollins University Hollins UniversityT is a major landowner in the area occupying 41 percent (298 acres) of the Hollins Study Area. Because of Hollins Universit<~'s significant presence in the area, County staff has met several times with Hollins Administration staff beginning in February-, 2008, to share information regarding and related to the Hollins Area Plan. The Universit<r has also hosted both of the community On the morning of July 2nd, 2008, staff led the Roanoke CountyT Planning Commission on a walking and driving tour of the Hollins Study Area. The purpose of the meeting was to orient the commissioners to the issues and opportunities present in the Hollins Study Area, such as a lack of sidewalk and parcels ripe for redevelopment. Staff showed the commissioners several sites of interest including Hollins University. On campus, staff asked them to note common features that they liked for possible consideration as characteristics for inclusion in design guidelines for the Williamson Road corridor between Plantation Road and Botetourt County. meetsngs. 3.5 Planning Commission Since the inception of the Hollins Area Plan in Februarys, 2008, staff regularly updated the Planning Commission as to the Plan's status. A special work session was also held on-site in Hollins in JulyT. 3.5.0 Joint Koanoke City ~ Koanoke Coamty Phyzning Corn~nission Meeting Because the Hollins Study Area is located a short distance from Roanoke City, staff conducted a joint Work Session with the Roanoke City and the Roanoke County Planning Commissions on April 15th, 2008, at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County staff presented an overview of the Hollins Area Plan detailing the Study Area, the preliminary plan goals, community involvement strategies and possible recommendations and implementation strategies. A draft 3-D, computer- generated version of the Hollins Study Area was also presented. 41 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan Graphic 3.17 Planning Commission Special ~~'ork Session Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Chapter 4: PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.0 Plan Goals The three main goals of the Hollins Area Plan are as follows: 1. Improve upon the established commercial, industrial, residential and institutional foundations while balancing industrial and commercial pressures with the needs of the communit<r; 2. Enhance the visual appearance of Williamson and Plantation Roads; and 4.7.0 Current Future Land Use Map ~ Scenario ~ As the Future Land Use Map exists today, half of the Hollins Study Area is designated Neighborhood Conservation, almost one-third is labeled Principal Industrial, 16 percent is identified as Core and four percent is classified as Transition. Table 4.00 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 1 Future Land Use Acreage Percentage Neighborhood Conservation 336.02 50% PtincipalIndustrial 194.30 29% Core 110.02 16% Tru~sition 28.08 4% Total 668.42 100% 3. Anticipate growth pressures and create standards for quality development. These goals can be achieved by implementing the following plan recommendations including changing the Future Land Use Map, creating new zoning overlays for a historic district and an entrance corridor, conserving viewsheds, modifying the Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program along with updating the Williamson Road Hollins Village Design Guidelines, planning for gateway and streetscape improvements and supporting transportation improvements such as van service and bicycle lanes. 4.1 Future Land Use Changes The future land use designations in the Hollins Study Area were last modified during the 1998 Comprehensive Plan rewrite. Several changes have occurred since this time including new commercial developments and demolition and redevelopment of several commercial structures. With an ideal location just off of Interstate 81 and an aging structure base, the Hollins area is again poised for substantial new development and redevelopment. The Future Land Use Map should be updated to account for new development already constructed as well as for anticipated proposed redevelopment of key parcels. The following Future Land Use Map scenarios propose such changes. The first Future Land Use Scenario does not propose any changes to the existing future land use designations. See Map 35, Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 1 in Appendix A for more information. 4. ~. ~ Faitaire Land Use Scenario 2 The second Future Land Use Scenario incorporates basic changes needed to update the future land use designations according to the established uses on the ground as well as the underlying zoning. See Map 36, Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 2 in Appendix A for more information. The proposed future land use modifications include: • Changing the main Hollins Universit<r parcel (zoned C-1 Office) and other small parcels near the Botetourt Counter line (zoned R-2 Medium Densit<r Residential) owned by Hollins from Neighborhood Conservation to Universit<T, a new proposed future land use designation: A future land use a~ ea that would guide a ynix~ of educational, institutional, liynited co7nyne~ vial, ~ ecreational, and open space uses related to a college or university campus. University areas are applied to lands o~arned by Hollins linive~:rity and Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT integral/contiguous to the central campus. Otbe~~ lands owned by the University 7nay he included in otbez• futu~ e land use designations that az e yno~ e apps opzzate to tbei~~ existing o~- futuz e land uses. Proposed land uses adjacent or in close p~oxi~nity to the Univea:rity designated areas should he encouraged to coynpliynent the Hollins University architectural and land design tbe7nes, and university activities. • Updating one parcel on Deer Branch Road and half of a parcel on Williamson Road that are zoned C-2 General Commercial from Neighborhood Conservation to Core • Changing a mobile home park between Williamson Road and Memory Lane that is zoned C-2 General Commercial from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition See Appendix B for more details regarding the proposed University Future Land Use Designation. The University Future Land L?se designation, if adopted, could also lead to the creation of a new Universit<r zoning district that would be more appropriate for Hollins University than the existing C-1 Office zoning district. • Converting the remaining Neighborhood Conser~-ation along Williamson Road that is developed by the Hollins Apartments (zoned R-3 Medium Density Multi-Famil~~ Residential,) Community School (zoned C-1 Office,) commercially-leased structures owned by Hollins UniversityT, Enon Baptist Church and a residence (all zoned C-1 Office) to the more appropriate Transition designation • Including the remainder of the Team Hollins propert~r off of Williamson Road adjacent to Hollins University and the Huffman Farm that is zoned R-3 Medium Densit<T Multi- Family Residential and C-2 General Commercial in the Core designation (from Principal Industrial) • Converting the remainder of the HCMF propert<T (zoned C-2 General Commercial and one parcel zoned I-1 Light Industrial) and other adjacent parcels (zoned R-3 Medium Densit~r Multi-Family Residential) at the corner of Williamson and Plantation Roads from Principal Industrial to Core. The proposed future land use totals for Scenario 2 put the new University designation as the highest acreage count encompassing 41 percent of the Study Area. The Principal Industrial category is reduced by four percent to 25 percent of the Study Area, the Core use increases by five percent to 21 percent of the Study Area, the Transition designation rises by 3 percent to seven percent of the Study Area, and Neighborhood Conservation drops significantly due to the creation of the University designation by 44 percent to 6 percent of the Study Area. Table 4.01 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 2 Future Land Use Acreage Percentage University- (new designation) 276.13 41% PiincipalIndustrial 163.82 25% Core 142.62 21% Transition 48.69 7% Neighborhood Conservation 37.16 6% Total 668.42 100% 4.9.2 Fz~ture Land Use Scenario 3 The third Future Land Use Scenario incorporates the changes proposed in Scenario 2 with additional modifications. See Map 37, Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 3 for more information. The proposed Future Land LTse changes for Scenario 3 include: 43 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan D1~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 • Converting the Hollins Universitc~ frontage along the north side of Williamson Road (zoned C-1 Office and R-2 Medium Densitc~ Residential) to Transition from University (Neighborhood Conservation and Transition in Scenario 1) • Expanding the Core designation north along Plantation Road to encompass a residential neighborhood along Indian Road that is currently zoned R-1 Low Density Residential but is designated Principal Industrial, several undeveloped Principal Industrial ITT parcels (zoned I-1 Light Industrial) as well as the newly-rezoned Patel Comfort Suites property (from I-1 Light Industrial to C-2 General Commercial zoning) also categorized as Principal Industrial unchanged from Scenario 2 with 6 percent of the Study Area. 4.7.3 Futaire Land Use Scenario 4 The final Future Land Use Scenario amends a few of the changes made in Scenario 3 to a more conservation-minded approach. See Map 38, Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 4 in Appendix A for more information. The proposed changes include: • Changing the residential and agricultural land along the western Hollins UniversityT property line from Transition as shown in Scenario 3 (originally Principal Industrial) to Conservation (property currently zoned R-1 Low Density Residential and I-1 Light Industrial) • Changing the designation of a large portion of residential and agricultural land along the western Hollins Universit~r propert~r line currently zoned R-1 Low Density Residential and I-1 Light Industrial from Principal Industrial to Transition The modifications proposed for Scenario 3 slightly reduce the percentage of Universitc~- designated land by 2 percent to 39 percent of the Study Area, increase Core by two percent to the second-highest future land use in the Study Area with 23 percent, increase Transition by 13 percent to 20 percent of the Study Area, reduce Principal Industrial by 12 percent to 13 percent of the Study Area and the Neighborhood Conservation figures remain Table 4.02 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 3 Future Land Use Acreage Percentage University (new designation) 259.91 39% Core 154.38 23% Transition 132.56 20% Pi7ncipal Industtial 84.41 13% Neighborhood Conservation 37.16 6% Total 668.42 100% • Reverting the Friendship Lane parcels from Transition back to the original designation of Principal Industrial (currently zoned R-1 Low Densit~r Residential and I-1 Light Industrial) • Converting the Hollins University frontage on Williamson Road to the east of Campus Drive back to University shown in Scenario 2 (originally Neighborhood Conservation) but leaving the frontage to the west of Campus Drive as Transition as proposed in Scenario 3 (also originally Neighborhood Conservation.) Table 4.03 Hollins Study Area Future Land Use Scenario 4 Future Land Use Acreage Percentage L?niveisit<~ (new designation) 270.15 40% Core 154.38 23% Transition 54.67 8% Principal Industrial 89.89 13% Neighborhood Conservation 37.16 6% Conservation 62.17 9% Total 668.42 100% Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT 4.7.4 Future Land Use Designation Kefine~nentr Roanoke County utilizes only 11 future land use designations to classify approximately 250 square miles. As a result, these designations are broad in scope. To distinguish the Hollins Study Area from other areas of Roanoke County it is important to further define the t5rpes of uses and appearances desired within the Hollins Study Area. These uses are appropriate for the Hollins Study Area and no refinements are proposed. Coy e (I~ed) High-intensity urban development and larger- scale highway-oriented retail uses are encouraged in the Core designation: • Planned shopping centers and clustered retail uses; Neigbbo~hood Con.reT~ation (~'elloav~ The Neighborhood Conservation designation is intended for the following uses: • Single-family residential uses, attached and detached; • Neighborhood institutional centers such as parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, recreational and park facilities, community meeting areas and clubs; and • Low-impact commercial services to serve the local neighborhood. The areas proposed to remain Neighborhood Conservation in Scenarios T`vo through Four are currently developed by residential uses and should continue to be preserved. No modifications are proposed for Neighborhood Conservation in the Hollins Study Area. Transition (Orange The Transition designation generally serves as a buffer between highway uses and lower-intensitc~ development. Appropriate Transition uses include: • Planned office parks and independent facilities in park-like surroundings with a high degree of architectural and environmental design; • Small-scale planned and clustered retail uses; • Garden apartments; • Townhouses; and • Public and private recreational facilities. • Planned office and institutional developments; and • Planned limited industrial uses in economic opportunity areas. While the Core uses proposed are appropriate for development at interstate interchanges and along major roads, the character of the Hollins area and the historic architecture of Hollins Universit~r should be emphasized in any new development or redevelopment at this location. To avoid the Plantation Road interchange (Exit 146) looking like any other interchange across the countr~T, "big box" retail stores and generic strip shopping centers should be avoided. Restaurants and other businesses serving travelers should be distinctive in appearance and representative of the Hollins area. All industrial uses should be redirected towards nearby lands designated as Principal Industrial. P~znczpallndust~zal (I'u~~le~ A variety- of industryT t~-pes are encouraged in the Principal Industrial designation, such as: • Manufacturing, storage, marketing and wholesaling of agricultural products; • Small industries and custom manufacturing; • iVhning and extraction; • Conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers and storage yards; and • Planned industrial parks as employment centers that may include mixed land uses including supporting retail services. 45 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan DRAFT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Agricultural uses should continue to be permitted far the existing farms located within the StudyT Area; however, new agricultural uses should not be allowed. Mining and extraction uses are not appropriate for this area of Roanoke County and should be prohibited. Other low-intensity industrial uses should be permitted, provided structures along Plantation Road incorporate historic design cues from Hollins UniversityT into their sites. Storage yTards should be permitted as long as they are not located directly on or can be easilyT viewed from Plantation Road. 4.2 Zoning Overlays The two proposed zoning overlays in the Hollins area will encourage higher-quality development by customizing site standards for non- residential parcels located along Williamson, Plantation and Peters Creek Roads. The zoning overlays would be geared towards new construction, substantial additions and significant reconstruction. To adopt these zoning overlays, a separate action must be taken by the Board of Supervisors. other buildings or stzz~ctures within the locality having an i7npo~~ant histo~zc, architectuzal, archaeological o~• cultu~ al intea est... amending the existing honing ordinance and delineating one ov7no~~e histo~zc dist~zcts, adjacent to such land~na~ks, buildings and st~~ctures, o~• encoynpassing such areas, or encompassing parcels of land contiguous to aT~e~zal streets or high~arays...found by the gove~~ing body to be significant routes of tou~zst access to the locality or to designated histo~zc landmarks, buildings, stz~ctuves o~° dist~zcts they ein... The gove~ ning body may p~ ovide foT• a ~ evie~ar board to administe7- the o~dinance...The ordinance may include a provision that no building or stzz~cture, including signs, shall be erected, z~econst~z~cted, altered o~• ~ estop ed avithin any such dist~zct unless appvoved dy the vevie~ar boa~d...as being architecturally compatible with the histozzc landma~hs, buildings or stTZ~ctures therein. This legislation enables Roanoke County to adopt a new historic zoning district to encompass the identified historic structures and to create a review board for approval of certain changes within the historic district. 4.2.0 Hollins University Historic District The Hollins College Quadrangle District is one of only seven Roanoke County listings on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and it is also listed on the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) Virginia Landmarks Register (VLR.) The Quadrangle District is comprised of six historic structures dating from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s. DHR identified and surveyed 18 additional structures on the Hollins campus in 1991. These buildings should be nominated for inclusion on the NRHP and the `T,R. Only at the local level can regulations be crafted to protect such structures. Section 15.2-2306 of the Code of Virginia states: Any locality may adopt an ordinance setting forth the hZSto?ZC landmarks within the locality as established by the Virginia Board of Histo~zc Resources, and any A Hollins Universit<- Historic District could include the main campus parcel and it could also extend along the frontage parcels of Williamson Road from Botetourt County to Plantation Road. With the assistance of an Architectural Review Board, not only the Hollins UniversityT campus but also the Williamson Road corridor would benefit from architectural review of new development. A proposed goal of the Board could be to take cues from existing historic development to be used in rehabilitating and redeveloping older structures as well as in designing new development to create a more cohesive community and a sense of place. 1Villiamson road Hollins Village Design Guidelines The architectural and site standards by which new development would be held could be an updated and improved version of the Williamson Road Hollins Village Design Guidelines. These Guidelines Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT are currently used to determine the merit of Commercial Corridor Matching Grant applications located within the Williamson Road Hollins Village corridor (see Map 28, Williamson Road Hollins Village Corridor Boundary in Appendix A) and for land use applications (special use permits and rezonings) located within the same boundary that are heard by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. 4.2. ~ Entrance Corridor Overlay District Development Authorit<- (EDA.) The program provides 50 percent matching funds with a X15,000 dollar matching cap through the EDA and an available $5,000 dollar increase 020,000 dollar total) approved through the Board of Supervisors to propert<r owners located in certain areas for building facade and site improvements. Businesses within the Williamson Road Hollins Village Corridor BoundaryT have participated sparingly in the last several years with an average of one application approved per year over the last three years. The Hollins Entrance Corridor Overlay District (ECOD would encourage higher-quality new development as well as appropriate renovations to existing commercial and industrial structures to enhance the character of the Plantation and Williamson Road corridors. The ECOD is proposed to include all frontage properties except parcels developed by single-family residential uses located within 400 feet of the edge of Right-of--Way along the following corridors: • Plantation Road from Interstate 81 to Williamson Road; • Williamson Road from Plantation Road to Peters Creek Road; and • Peters Creek Road from Williamson Road to Deer Branch Road. The ECOD could eliminate certain uses, such as a Rubble Landfill or a Private Aviation Facilit<r that would be out-of-character with the existing communit<T. Development standards for properties located within the ECOD could also be changed to require, for example, that parking lots be located to the side or rear of structures, that freestanding signs be monument-style, and that light pole heights have a maximum height. 4.3 Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program As it is currently structured, the Commercial Corridor Matching Grant Program is administered through the Roanoke Count<r Economic To improve participation in the program and therefore the appearance of the area, the following program changes should be considered: 1. Expand the Boundary to include: • Gander Way • Friendship Lane to and including Garland Circle and Meyers Drive • Williamson Road to the Roanoke City line 2. Retain an architecture firm to respond to inquiries from business owners to design three options for the owner to choose from 3. Initiate an application fee that would help cover the architectural design fee 4. Provide templates for monument sign design and landscaping design 5. Create incentives through Economic Development for use of green building and Low Impact Design techniques 6. Determine tiered levels of funding or matching percentages dependent upon: • Type of project o Facade renovations would qualify for $50,000 dollars o Monument signs would qualify for $20,000 dollars o Landscaping would qualify for $15,000 dollars • Percentage of compliance 0 33 percent matching funds: Less than Zoning Ordinance compliance 0 50 percent matching funds: Meeting Zoning Ordinance compliance 47 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 0 66 percent matching funds: Achieving Design Guidelines compliance The Hollins Area Plan Communit<- Survey results showed that business owners would much prefer a 66 percent funding match over a 50 percent funding match. If the program were to be restructured in any of the ways proposed, it is likely that program participation would increase. summit prominentlyT visible from all locations except .~L~g1-...s.. ,.w.. ,y 3 ~, 4.4 Viewshed Conservation Tinker Mountain to the northeast of the Study Area has been identified multiple times as significant to the overall identity of the Study Area. Historically, its peak has played a significant role for Hollins University with their annual Tinker Day celebration, where classes are spontaneously canceled and all students, facult~r and staff hike to the top of the mountain. Visible from all seven of the surveyed locations, currently the summit is the site of numerous communications towers and a significant cleft containing power transmission lines. For future preservation purposes, joint efforts with Botetourt County will be necessary as the peak is located within its jurisdiction. -,~Fi _ .. -yw .~" W.""~~-~.-.e.. Graphic 4.04 Tinkei il~Iountain The second most visible feature is Read Mountain to the southeast of the Study Area with its Graphic 4.05 Read iVlountain East Campus Drive. Much of the summit is protected with a conservation easement and is under development as parkland to be operated by Roanoke Count<r. As such, the integrit<= of this sensitive area is less vulnerable to development than other areas visible from the Study Area. Additional development towards its base is regulated by ordinance, with the upper areas being subject to steep slope ordinances. To the north, Brushy Mountain is prominently viewed from all but two of the identified locations. Fortunately the area in and around the summit is owned by Roanoke City as part of the Carvins Cove Natural Reserve and in April, 2008, a conservation easement was placed on 6,185 acres approaching the ridgeline. This easement prevents grading, blasting, mining and large-scale development from occurring in these areas. With the easement in place, the overall integrity of its appearance will remain for future generations. As the ridgelines traverse towards the southwest en route to Montgomery Count<r, much of Roanoke Count- Comprehensive Plan Graphic 4.06 Biushy and Green Ridge iVlountains November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT it is visible in some form from throughout the Study Area. Of the identified peaks, Fort Lewis Church Mountain is the most prominent landmark. Visible from all locations except the Interstate 81 interchange, the majorit~r of its peak is part of the Havens Wildlife Management Area, owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia. With this designation its development is extremely limited which is appropriate as its rugged terrain is not conducive to any significant tSTpe of development. Additional ridges such as Coyner Mountain to the east in Botetourt County are prominently viewed from throughout the Study Area. Again, these sensitive areas can only be protected through cooperative efforts with Botetourt Count<r. To address these areas in addition to those present in Roanoke Count<r, a collaborative and comprehensive plan for viewshed preservation needs to be developed for the entire Roanoke Valley to preserve these views for future generations. 4.5 Gateway and Streetscape Improvements 45.0 Pec~est~zan Facilities and Aynenities Side~aralks While sidewalks have been constructed along short portions of Williamson Road, sidewalks are needed along the entire length and on both sides of Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road within the Hollins Study Area. Sidewalks are also needed along the western side of Plantation Road. The most immediate need is for sidewalks along the Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road frontage between Hollins University (Campus Drive) and Deer Branch Road. Additionally, these sidewalks could be expanded to create a greater pedestrian network to connect with Walrond Park and the Hollins University segment of the Tinker Creek Greenway. Sidewalks ranked fifth in priority along Williamson and Peters Creek Roads and fourth along Plantation Road in the Hollins Area Plan Community Surrey. Over 80 percent of Hollins students and facultcr, staff and administration employees surreyed agreed that better sidewalks are needed along Williamson Road. Gateway and streetscape improvements typically achieve the most positive visual impact and change in a community for the amount of funds spent. Several design aspects can be included and considered for streetscape plans, including: • Sidewalks • Crosswalks with Pedestrian Signals • Improved Road and Pedestrian Lighting • Underground Utilities • Bicycle Lanes • Street Trees • Landscaped Medians • Communit<- Signs • Light Post Banners • Street Furniture (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) 49 Roanoke Count<T Comprehensive Plan Graphic 4.07 Dirt Path along ~X7illiamson Road DKAFT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Cross~aralks avith Pedestrian Signals Due to the volume of pedestrians from Hollins Manor and Hollins University walking along Williamson Road, the intersection of Williamson and Plantation Roads has the greatest need for a signalized pedestrian crossing. The second priorityT for a signalized crossing is the intersection of Williamson and Peters Creek Roads. With large residential areas in the immediate vicinity and a significant population of college students, having these amenities are critical in the ability of the residents to have a viable, safe means of traversing the corridor on foot. The Hollins Community SurveyT results showed that crosswalks with pedestrian signals ranked sixth in priority- for Williamson and Peters Creek Roads as well as for Plantation Road. Additionally, over 80 percent of Hollins students and over 90 percent of Hollins facultyr, staff and administration employees surveyed responded that better crosswalks are needed along Williamson Road. Pedestrian Lighting Pedestrian lighting should be included alongside sidewalks for safety reasons. Nicely designed light poles can also be used to display banners and hang planter baskets. The Hollins University surveys indicated that over 80 percent of students and over 70 percent of faculty; staff and administration employees who walk along Williamson Road contend that better pedestrian lighting is needed. utilities Utility) poles are typically located with the right-of--way and can be positioned in direct conflict with proposed sidewalks and landscaping. In the Hollins Area Plan Community Survey, the top streetscaping priority for citizens was undergrounding utilities along Williamson and Peters Creek Roads. Similarly, undergrounding utilities was the second highest requested streetscape priorityr along Plantation Road. Other Amenities Other tc-pes of street furniture such as refuse bins, benches and bicycle racks should be considered as part of the streetscape project as well. 45.9 Lan~'scaping Street T~ ees Street trees provide shade, relief from heat, environmental and aesthetic benefits. The streetscape plans should provide street trees either between the curb and sidewalk or behind the sidewalk. The Hollins Area Plan Community Survey ranked street trees as the first priorityT along Plantation Road and the third priorityT along Williamson and Peters Creek Roads. Landscaped Medians and Community Signs Landscaped medians also provide a significant aesthetic benefit for any corridor. The Community Survey ranked landscaped medians fourth and third in priorityr ranking for Williamson/Peters Creek Roads and Plantation Road. CommunityT identification signs are also important features at locations marking community entrances. These can be placed in landscaped medians. CommunityT signs ranked second for Williamson and Peters Creek Roads and fifth for Plantation Road in the CommunityT Survey. 4.5.2 Koad Cross-Sections As a part of the conceptual streetscape plans, road cross-sections will be designed to show typical road sections for certain locations with the Hollins Study Area. 4.6 Hollins University Segment of the Tinker Creek Greenway 4.6.0 Greenway Const~nction The Hollins University portion of the Tinker Creek Greenway is shown in the 2007 Greenways Plan Update. While a rough alignment of the geenway has been identified between Williamson Road and Carvins Cove Reservoir, more definite Roanoke County- Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DRAFT potential route options are currently being marked in • Constructing the greenway to include a 50- to the field for consideration by Hollins University. 70-foot-wide bridge and t<vo culvert crossings. This segment of the Tinker Creek Greenway will start at the tunnel under Williamson Road and will continue along the west side of Carvins Creek on Hollins University property until crossing the creek just south of Keystone Lane. The greenway will continue northward along the eastern side of Carvins Creek turning eastward at Interstate 81 and crossing underneath the interstate utilizing an existing tunnel. The alignment will continue along property Hollins Universityr owns on the northern side of Interstate 81 and will cross onto their Botetourt County property. The only other propertyT owner located between the Hollins property and the Roanoke City-owned Carvins Cove Reservoir is the Tanger family. The Graphic 4.08 Carvins Cove Reservoir (viewed from the southwest) Tangers have agreed to allow the greenway to cross their property. are: The next steps in completing the greenway • Determining and surveying the final alignment; • Recording access easements for greenway use granted to Roanoke County; and 4.6.9 Shared Greenn~ay Parking Lot Hollins UniversityT owns a commercial parcel at 7770 Williamson Road that currently houses Hollywood's Restaurant This parcel is located near the proposed greenway route. The University is interested in expanding the available parking for the restaurant and has agreed to partner with Roanoke County- to construct a shared parking lot for use of both Hollywood's Restaurant and greenway patrons. The parking lot is planned to be environmentally friendly. 4.7 Transportation Improvements 4.7.0 Bicycle Lanes The Bikeway Plan fog- the Roanoke Tlalley Area Metropolitan Planning OTgani~ation identifies "Priority List Corridors" and "Vision List Corridors" for bike lane additions. These lanes should be incorporated into any streetscape modification plans taking place in the Hollins Study Area. 4.7.9 Transit Extension In light of commercial growth along the Plantation Road corridor including Gander Mountain, Camping World and Tractor Supply in addition to existing employment and institutional destinations including Wachovia, ITT, Double Envelope and 51 Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan Graphic 4.09 Hollti~vood's Restaurant Dl~FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins University, the provision of van service to the Hollins area may be viable for workers and students. The Job Access and Reverse Commute program is still considered to be the best option among available programs. 14 to 20 passenger vans could be utilized to shuttle patrons to and from work and school locations with run hours determined by shift changes. Federal dollars account for half of such a program's funding and local or private funding would provide the other 50 percent for the operation under Job Access and Reverse Commute. With regards to the non-driving aging population, CORTRAN is the recommended public transportation option for this area. 4.7.2 Future Tra~c Projections The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has projected traffic counts for major roads within the Count~T until the vear 2040. While the estimates for Route 11 do not change, every other segment of Plantation Road, Peters Creek Road and Interstate 81 increase. This potential increase in traffic could benefit local businesses by increasing their visibilityT but could also be a detriment if congested areas are created that motorists avoid. The most notable increases are along Interstate 81 from Interstate 581 to Plantation Road with an increase over 25 years of 45,208 trips (52 percent) and between Plantation Road and the Botetourt County line with an increase of 31,584 trips (47 percent.) 4.8 Funding Sources There are several means by which to raise funds for the improvements proposed in this Plan. 4.8.0 Economic Development Staff has worked with the Department of Economic Development throughout the course of the Hollins Area Plan as the recommendations involved could have significant impacts from both a planning and an economic development standpoint. Among the funding ideas proposed are: • Utilizing Public Private Partnership (PPP) funds • L?sing untapped funds from the Commercial Corridor Matching Grant account • Soliciting corporate sponsorships from large commercial and industrial business owners in the Studv Area • Creating a special tax district for commercial and industrial properties to generate funding for improvements to be made within the Study Area that would ultimately benefit those business owners 4.8. ~ Virginia Department of Transportation The Virginia Department of Transportation administers the Federal SAFETEA-LU program Table 4.10 VDOT Projected Future Daily Traffic Estimates by Route Section Route Section Future Daily Traffic Estimates 2015 2025 2030 2035 2040 Route 11 (Lee Highway) Roanoke Cim Line to Botetourt Countti~ Line 13,550 13,550 13,550 13,550 13,550 Route 115 (Plantation Road) Cresdand Drive to Route 11 Route 11 to Indian Road 17,549 19,824 20,962 22,100 23,238 Indian Road to Interstate 81 16,330 18,206 19,144 20,082 21,020 Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) Roanoke CitG~ Line to Route 11 19,680 20,198 20,456 20,715 20,974 Interstate 81 Interstate 581 to Route 115 (Combined 86,766 104,849 113,891 122,932 131,974 Traffic Estimated for 2 Parallel Roads) Route 115 to Botetourt County Line 66,913 79,546 85,863 92,180 98,497 * estimates for Route 115 from Crestland llrive to Route 11 are extremely' high and were therefore not included. Estimates are lineal projections based on traffic history per Statewide Planning System. Roanoke CountyT Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT (Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users) for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The SAFETEA-LU program runs through 2009 and is a Transportation Enhancement program intended to improve non- motorized transportation, enhance the public's traveling experience, revitalize communities and improve the qualit~T of life. The reimbursement program applies to the following facilities and activities: 1. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities 2. Bicycle and pedestrian safetc~ and educational activities 3. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites 4. Scenic or historic highway programs including welcome centers 5. Landscaping and scenic beautification 6. Historic Preservation 7. Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities 8. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors and conversion to trails 9. Inventory, control and removal of outdoor advertising 10. Archaeological planning and research 11. Environmental mitigation to address water pollution and wildlife protection 12. Establishment of transportation museums transportation improvements and viewshed conservation -and by timeframes. The timeframes are Tier 1 (0-5 years), Tier 2 (6-10 rears) and Tier 3 (10+ years). Some strategies are planned to be completed within one tier, others cross timeframes (this is due to some strategies starting later within a given timeframe or a strategy that may have multiple phases), and a few are included in all three tiers (t~Tpically ongoing strategies). The schedule also lists those responsible parties that would be involved for each strategy. These may change over time by adding or deleting responsible parties. Being listed as a responsible party does not commit that party to any funding obligations. A 20 percent local funding match is required for this program and the deadline for applications is November 1 s`, 2008. 4.8.2 Other Funding Funds may also be available through County revenues and Hollins University= contributions. 4.9 Schedule of Implementation Strategies Appendix B (Document 13) contains a schedule of implementation strategies for this Plan. The strategies are grouped by topic -commercial matching grant program, entrance corridor, greenways, historic resources, maintenance programs, pedestrian amenities, streetscape improvements, 53 Roanoke Count<r Comprehensive Plan November 11, 2008 Hollins Area Plan DKAFT Appendix A -Maps MAP NAME PAGE REFER Map 1 Hollins Study Area within Roanoke County 2 Map 2 Hollins Study Area 2 Map 3 Hollins Area Plan Water Features 5 Map 4 Hollins Area Plan Topography 6 Map 5 Hollins Area Plan Slope 6 Map 6 Hollins Area Plan Soils 7 Map 7 Hollins Area Plan Karst Topography and Features 7 Map 8 Hollins Area Plan Open Space and Tree Cover 8 Map 9 Hollins Area Plan Greenways and Bikeways 9 Maps 10-16.5 Hollins Area Plan Viewsheds 9 Map 17 Hollins Area Plan Combined Viewsheds 9 Map 18 Hollins Area Plan Aerial Photograph (1953) 14 Map 19 Hollins Area Plan Aerial Photograph (2006) 14 Map 20 Hollins Area Plan Structures by Year Built 14 Map 21 Hollins Area Plan Historic Features 16 Map 22 Hollins Area Plan Census Block Groups (2000) 18 Map 23 Hollins Area Plan Existing Land Use 20 Map 24 Hollins Area Plan Property Ownership 21 Map 25 Hollins Area Plan Upcoming Development 22 Map 26 Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use 23 Map 27 Hollins Area Plan Zoning Districts 23 Map 28 Williamson Road Hollins Village Corridor Boundary 24 Map 29 Hollins Area Plan School Districts 25 Map 30 Hollins Area Plan Fire and Rescue Districts 28 Map 31 Hollins Area Plan Police Reporting District Boundaries 28 Map 32 Bus Routes in Proximity to the Hollins Study Area 31 Map 33 Hollins Area Plan Sidewalks and Pedestrian Amenities 31-32 Map 34 Hollins Area Plan Traffic Counts 32 Map 35 Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 1 42 Map 36 Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 2 42 Map 37 Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 3 43 Map 38 Hollins Area Plan Future Land Use Scenario 4 44 I Roanoke Count~T Comprehensive Plan Q m ~ T - =~~~, _ ~. a Y U ~ 3 N ~ ~ cq ~j o ~ - N N ~ N ~ _ O x N a CO ' M N T ~\ - \\ ~ ~ . ~..~. \ C 7 O C ~ O U o ~ c 0 0 ~ H 0 m 0 c ,c~ o 1 ~ l l 0 ~_ U ~l i E c ~ ~ ~ o U ~ ~ ~ ~ o o T Y ~ c _ ~° U ~ T 1 c ° U ~ ~ _~ ~~' ~ ~ c o O U U ~ ~ ~ ~ O o ~ ~ o c .~ 0 cv U O J ~ c ~ ~ ~ O T L U ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~° U ~ U ~, (n ~ E c ~ o a o ~ ~ Q °' ~ ~ o 2 ~ ~ U ~ T ~ ~ (6 m ~ U ~ ~ ~~` `,ICI ~~ ~/j~ ~ J'~M1V I ~\ ~v~~J ~ ~ ~~ ' Ir ~ ~ ~ ~.~~~'~~ ~ ; ~ j S d~~aja ~~-_ ~~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ / i ~ j / a~~, . ~ A ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ p f _ Z ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ m ~v ~o ~_.. DELL ~~_'~ 'loeo ' ~~~~-6~ j4) ~ _ ~a,p \ 5~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ Q - /,r~~ t\ _N U ~ t-/ o~ 1 __ _ 0800 `~ \~ ~77y~ L I I ~~ N ?1 `l/ I/I ~III4 ~ ~l j /l //// ` ~ ~ ~ a ) / 1M1~d9 // ~ .. J t r / ~/ ~ I ~ l \ _ ~ u~ O ~ / 1 ~f ~~~f 100 ////''' ~ ~ ~ `\\ IL~.~~t5 ~~ Il \ \\ `( 1 ( ) / ~l~ ~` // l f -.,~ ~ o ( ~ ~ ,~`~ ~ 1, ^~ ` ` ` ~ \ / ` ~ // jJJj~ S c y Y., ~ s J acct ~\, \,/ ~~ ~ r~i ~ _ \~ / ~ -`\~f (f , i~%~ f' rm ~ ~ ~\ I ~ p \ ~ / ~~ ~~- ~ rtf L ` \ // ~ \ ~ ~ . ~` ~~ B v ~ \ 6 1 ~~J/ ( lo y /~ . -/ ~C ~ 17 N \~ `'~ ~ V ! I ~ `N\ ~ ~\~J 1 ~ / ' C O~ o j/Y ~~ it ~ 5 1 ~\~ . ~'~ ~ ~~~ / ' ~~ ~ fay ~ \~ `'-~` Z1l ~j ~ j~~JJ ~ ~ ~ j ~l ooh o llll) \t ~U1 J ' ~~ vvvD ~ ~( ~ ~ ~ ~ ep o ~~~oDL ~ ~ ~ w ( ~ ~ e ~ ~~ o ~/ A i~ ~ ~_ ~ ti-~ J 7 .~ ~ saw A ///~„// \I J \ f~i \ ~ \ pt( ~/ ~_ ~t ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ - ~\~ ~ ~\\ \ \ \~ / / / ~p 1040 ~ .. ` ~ l y / 0 p / ` ~ -~~ p ` \ ~ \ ` ~ 'Q6~ ~ ~ ~ J /~ r J~ Jl y\~ 1 \1 F ~ \J ~ ~ o ~ } \ 1t2 1`/ \ ~ \ \\\ oc ~ \ ~\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ` lh ~ 1 / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ be O \ \ \\ \ N . I l ~ / 1 ~ ~ o~ ~ I \` \1I ~ 0 / ~ l l ~ ~ ~~ ~~ j 6 ~~ o ~ 1)))~ ~\1 ((( ~ ///111---... \ ` ~ ~ p50 J^ ~ ~ / \\ % / l i / r ~ ~ ,, ~///~, / 1~ ~ ~ o ~, i `~ \ 1 1 ~ .. f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~? ~ ~ \ ~ ~ L 1 ~ ~ i~ E ~ ~~ ~~ ,o 4 ~ 1` \ ~~ ~ - ~ s ~ ~ ~~ 1 L ~ ~ ~~;~~ 6 ~~ ~~ ~ `~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ` h l II/~~ ~~~111D/ r ~ / ~ f Q I « to ^~ ~ ~ _ O ~ '` o \ ~ ~~ / ' ti~1 004\ ~ o ~ ~o ~V p9 ` P ~~ ~1A0 r/ 1 / ~ r 0 ~~_~ ~ ~~ c .S / / 11 ` p L ) 7 ` ~\ ~ p [z ` o 6 % ~ \j % / Ell/} Q l /`/ \ 1 1 L 1 f / N ~\_i,.l } y / 060 .~ .J~ ~ a / (/ ~ l///// \ \. a J// j ~ / t ~ f 1 ( VA 10 :~ _ / l L \ \ v ~ ~ ~ A ~ ` ~ ~ ) , ;~~ v~ ~` '~ ~ ' ~ ~' ~ ; t ~ ~ , b i r 1 ~ ~`VA~~ ~ 6i~J ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ %A ~~ ~, / i c t ~ ~ l ) J' l < ~ m h12p ~~ Q ` y~ ~ '~ a - ~~Iy000~ 1 x ~', !~ ~~ =~~~n ~, 0 ti 0 0 N O ~ o 0 Y \/ ~ ~ ~~ ti i ~r ._ .i ~ ~, T '~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ _ ~~ N 1 ~~ ~' ~s ~ ~ Q 0 ~~ 6 h~ L ~~ ~`, ~ y 0 Y" ~ ~'g ,_ ~' _ ,~ ~p =~~~n .~ a ~ r,"`n~o o o ~~ d N~ ~Nld \ _ ~' P C ry~ ~ W r ~$ \Ol49Ri w `'~~ O ~' ~~ ° ~ % I c~ ~ \/ _ o ~ _ m ~ o E .A ~ o E }} E ~ ~~ _ 2y o - ~ __~ o m z ~ % ~ ~~` ~ / o i N~ \ d c ~ ~ _ .t1 `~ ~ d4 ~J \ 6\ i ~ \\ ~ ~ 2'-: \\ ~i ~f= / J~ ~', .~ ~1R ~ ~id ~ ty ~ xs' ~' ~°a,~: a* \ ~ ~` ~`~~i ~ ! .~ i i I ~ ~ S I i i v~~ur-____~ ~ o~ i j ~ ~~%~ ~' / ~ / ~.'. ~/ /~ \ % \ \ ~ \\ aoNt,~' I 0 ~~~\ }} \ ~ \ \ ~ \\ L y-- U ~L 0 y-- ~_ ~ }} i ~ L Q // \J i ` / }} - } TO T r N Q 0 z ~ Is" l t ~J - / / ~, ~3~~ ~~s P M ~, i ~~ _ 1f, m ~ ,_ ~m ~ ~ 1 ~~~. r ~~ ~-- - f ~~j~~ ~ f \ g k1 m o~ ~ ~?.^' ~s ,~;x 6" ~ @ ~' ~ `Y3 ~ ~ O ~ ~~ J \ J /-~~ % t/~ N ~ O m '2~y~ U ,;~ - o ~~: ~~ ° o -- ~ e ~`. ,' ~ \ ~ ~'0 i _ Sy P € o H~ ~~L ~a / - ~ d ~,~1 s~ \ G ~_~ ~ JJ~'~ ~ , O i s ~ / _ ~ ~ \ , ~ i i ~_____- o~~ $ i i ~ , ~~~ ~ *~ ~ v ~~ ~ ~ 3 ~ C `~ `~~, \~ / a `, 3 ~~ s ~, ~ gam: .. -~-~ N~ ~ _° ;- °,'~" _ ~ g,, r} „~ ~ ;~ ~ -- ~ - ~~. a. 3 ~. I~r ~ ~ ffi g ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ r ~ ~ m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q e 9 > 1 1„:.-,., ~ ~ ~ ~~ .sue ~h ® ~ ® v y q _ ~ f o e ~r~. 7 I 9 fit, /~ ~/ ~i L 1 q /// "~/ 6 Q Y j~ O t t W ~ ~ m i f r s o t ~ ~~~J`\ i ' 1 / ~ ' ~ /1 A 1 l ® e } /~ /~, ~ ,~ ": \ G }. a~ ~-'~ ;~" L ~~~ ~ a t ~ `` r ~U O r '``~..... ~ ~--' Q 1 ~ ^, ~ r,, ~ f % . ~~ ~ fa r /, r "' y~~ ` ` T ,c~~~, ~ j ~ r r _, r: ~ ~ ,. t ~ ~€ r,o[ ~ ~,< =~~~n v a +, o ~ ~ ~ __-__ U `-^~ j -- o R y ~ l, ~ FF ~ I { \ ` ~ p t "W ~ ~ ~ VI +'' ~, 3 ~%- ~ ~o' 0 ~ ~`' ~'~~ Al i '8~ ~'` _~ f c~ ~ ` d` ~ ~ ~ f ...'.~ ( _ ~ ~ ~.~h E ,~ N O 2 0 d a ly / E~ E 8 y 'E E 8 Y ~ ~ /•, II I II o~ L L~•L y t , ` ~~ / {i { ¢. % N\ 1 \\ 3~ l ¢ O ~ bby ! ~ \ rte. ~~ ~ ~ N ~ i ~ t ~ ~~ o' ~'~ N I / "1-0 \ ~, ~ i T p yq,, ~ ~ i ~~ a 'c ~,s \ ~ t' ~ ~` \\ d i ~ I i S I i ~ / / Cj ~~ ~ ' ~: i Y ~~ ~ ~ s E m W ~ . \ -v o ~ \ ~'~ .l'~ rr L / ~ / A > ~~ t lY ~ L r~.J ~ ` ~ ~ ~ \ \ / ~ ~ f/ c l`/" ,/ ~ `' > ~ \ U ~a ,~ ~ ,?~ ~ ~ N ~ ` r ~ A .~ ~ 1~ ` b j ~~~~ C C C ~, ~ V ~ ~,~° ~ ~ ~ ~, r Q O ~ ~a ~ ~ . ~^ `~ ~, / a ~ y~\,~ J;- ~- ~ w N ,. U l r ~ Rh ~\ ~ t ~ ~/ 1 ~ ` m ~ ot0~ \ ' } o ~ ,/ , ~yµ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~` N _ , - r '~ -~ ti Q ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~, ~ e ~ . , ~ ,, ~ t ~ / ~ ~ fg r,/';: ~ gym, ~n ~~~ ~~o ~ -"°"a0 2 I O °-' a ~ ~ \ c ~ l~ l~ / ~ ~ Nl_ ~Nld 1~--\~~~_ ~ O ryry~~ \ V ~ W r ~$ \Ol49Ri w `-~ O ~~ - I / 8 0 O c ~ i t m m z m U o - d d 3 ~ i ~ _ ~~ a E ~ ~ ~ j ~, ~~ E N~ _ ~ g ~ ~ 1 ~ O N U O o N ~ e ~ ~'" ~ I E -~ O N Z lip ~ (n W a s ~~ ~ ~ a a, 5 ~~2 0 •~aa ~ '~ _-- mss ~ \ L p/ ~ "~ .> d ,~ ~ ~ ~, \_ ~a\ '~ '~o ~o = ' ,\ %/ \` ° , -- ~ ~~ ~. \ \ ~\ o ~ x~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~i ' i I ~ j ~+-_____~ \ i ~~ 1 i i '~ ~~~k i ~•~ ~"~ ,. ~ ~ U ( i \ (A p _ \ ~ ~0 U ~ ~ e3o- e" ~ ~ U ~ m ~ ~d N N (n \ m a a_, ~~~ W~2 ~ oaa \ s~~ \\ fn mZZ U ~L y-- ~_ ''''~~~~WWWW 6- Q m' U e ,. ® ~~® ./~ g fa / ~' ~ a ' x° 0 ` fa /~-a ~4 N w Q 0 ~, m ~ =IOI = N z Q fa ~~, i ~ / % ~ ~ E `J' ~ ~'~ ~ '~,~ it ~ , rv n - ~~ v ~ ~ ~~ I ~ _ 0 I ~ _ ~ v ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 0~~~ ~~~ ~~ VI ~ y \ ~ Ye- v ® a I / y < v e o v s ~ - a s o o ~ ~ ~ r m a z v ~; ' w "'' 8 ~ ~~ ~ ae ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~~ I ~ ~ SO) ©y °-o ~-- ~ O ~ N l~ ~ ~ ~' i ~' Amy ~ o ~ ~ __ i~ ~ ~~~ -~i~~-R ~ ~ ~,,~ ~ y~~~' A , o I ~ ~ - _~'~ ~°~' ~~~ ~~~ ,% ~\ w ~ ~ o Q ~ _ I NT~6,y1 ~y ~ ~ ~p&~ f ~~ ~~ ~ 1 1 U ....~..... ,~ , ~/`~~ ~• 4 _ .~ ~, ~ `YW ~~ ~/ ~~b ~' W~ a ~\ o r '~ ~ ~,, ° ~~' 1 9 ~,;~ ~~ i ~~'~ i \\ \~ ~ ~-----' o ~, ~~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~`~~ ~ ~ ~~v°°~~ ./ °~~ C I ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~\ i ~s" ~tl `. j ~~ zk'p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ ~Y y:. i ~~ ~~ r ~ I ~ ~~s~' ~ j' ( .' ~ ~ Q ,.{ i iii` j ~1 by N~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~--~ ~~ ~ ~ fl~~ t~ © ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~h ~ '~~ A ~~~"' ~~ ~ '~ ' ~~ zQ~` ~ °~y o~ ~ f~ 1 -~>y 1 ~ ,E~i ~ ~ i f ~ ~ ~~`~~, '` N /~ ~o~ ~aa~ /~/_~ sv" aW?` a ' ~_© ~~--~ N ~ ~ ' _ ~~~ ~~ ©~' o ~ w Q ~' _ ,r o, w ~ °' - ~~~ y~,~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ •- ~ ~, i ~~/ ~~ ~ I / ~ ~~ ~'~~~ f ~ ~ ~~ M ~/ / z°/ ~ a~~ ~ r' a ~'g °;~= - ~~~ .~ E / .~ o~ R ~ -1 1^\\ OP / ~~ ~ / ~. - ,. a ~~ ~} ` ---- ~ o _~m m!V = ~~ o -~ ~, o r'@~~ ~ < i N k ~ - ~ An ~1 _ v ~~ ~~~ \~ 1 1 W ~ ,~p1 ~ i ~~ yy/ 6t°A~ o ~ N ` ~___~ S ~1 % ~cf / Z ~ O e `g ~.~, i\ / _ yN a \~ ~ -_ ~ a ~ ~ ~ G s o o r m x o i ~ i v Py (~ 1 i. q iw \ ° f a ~ `~ ~Y~~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~w ~ ~~ / ~~;~` <~ ~v~ ~ is,T` j x I ~ ~ I -~ d Oy /, O ~~ \ , [y ~ ~ ~ U U o~` ~~ ~ s ~ qe% i (~ 4 ~/f ~ ~ ^_ i Y~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ LL ~ 9 \ ~ ~~ ~~~•• ~hN / ~)\~ / \ ,~ 0 B M ~yi C~ G Appendix B -Documents DK~=1FT Hollins Area Plan November 11, 2008 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document 1 Federal Health Department Analysis of the Sulphur Spring at Botetourt Springs Document 2 Transcript of an Interview with William H. Bolster Document 3 Hollins University= Map Document 4 Hollins Area Plan Community Survey Document 5 Hollins Area Plan Community Survey Results J J Document 6 Hollins University Student Survey Document 7 Hollins University= Student Survey= Results Document 8 Hollins University Faculty= and Staff Survey= Document 9 Hollins University Faculty and Staff Survey Results Document 10 Hollins Community Meeting 1 Comments and Questions Document 11 Hollins Community Meeting 2 Comments and Questions Document 12 University Future Land Use Designation, Land Use Ty=pes and Land Use Determinants Document 13 Schedule of Implementation Strategies PAGE REFERENCED 12 15 24 34 34 37 37 38 38 40 40 43 53 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Document 1 Sulphur Spring Water Analysis, 1903. Our Beautiful Little Spring "Run on, little spring! Marvelous have been the results from your first discovery, at the bottom of Carvan's (sic) Creek, to the present time. May many come, in the future as in the past, to imbibe your health giving waters and to drink from those other springs your existence has brought into being, whose waters invigorate and develop all that is true and noble in womankind." Semi Annual ,1893. Document 2 History of the Hollins Area: An Interview with William (Bill) Henry Bolster Monday, July 7, 2008 The interview was held at 9:00 a.m. at the Cocke Cemetery on the Hollins University Campus. The following is a summary of the information received from William H. (Bill) Bolster regarding his knowledge of the history and evolution of the Hollins communit<r: • William (Bill) Bolster began the interview providing an account of how his family took residence in the Hollins communit~~. Mr. Bolster stated that Charles Lewis Cocke, founder of the present-day Hollins University, was his great-great grandfather. • Mr. Bolster provided a description of Charles L. Cocke's character, mentioning that he was avert'- religious man who wanted the college to have religious values. Mr. Bolster indicated that while it was important to Mr. Cocke that the college be based on religious ideas, ethics and morals; it was equally important that the college be nondenominational. • The location of the present-day Enon Baptist Church was originally the property of Hollins Universit~r. Charles Cocke donated it for the establishment of the church. There is a balcony in Enon Baptist Church where the slaves and African Americans were allowed to sit during religious services. • IVY. Bolster provided an account of slavery in the Hollins area prior to the Civil War. Charles Cocke freed the slaves under his possession, and even though it was against state law, Cocke taught many blacks how to read and write. Cocke taught many of the slaves on the Hollins University campus. He placed coverings over the windows so no one would know he was teaching blacks how to read and write. Although the graves aren't marked, it is believed that some of the slaves are buried in the Cocke cemetery. • Bolster gave a brief summary of his ancestors that are buried in the Cocke Cemetery. He stated that his great-great grandfather (Charles Lewis Cocke), his great-grandfather (Charles HenryT Cocke) and his mother (Leonora Cocke Trout Bolster) are buried in the cemetery, but his grandfather, Hugh HenryT Trout, is not buried there. Confusion arises due to the fact that his mother and her two brothers placed a memorial stone in the cemetery for his grandfather, leaving everyone to believe that his grandfather is buried in the family cemetery. Mr. Bolster then directed the interview towards the evolution of the Hollins University property-. The interview at the Cocke cemetery was interrupted and continued as a driving tour, led by Bill Bolster, throughout the Hollins University campus and the Hollins communit<r. • Mr. Bolster discussed the Sulphur Springs that are present on the Hollins University campus. The springs were the focal points of the Botetourt Springs Resort. During his childhood, Bill Bolster and Richard Flora (current Board of Supervisor for the Hollins District), along with other children in the Hollins communitST, used to dare each other to drink from the springs. The goal was to see who could drink the most "dippers". The springs were described as smelling like rotten eggs. • The resort was successful for a year, but the property eventually changed hands and the resort was converted to a seminary. The property owner who developed the Valley Union Seminary soon found 1~Hollins Area Plan Document 2 History of the Hollins Area: An Interview with William (Bill) Henry Bolster Monday, July 7, 2008 himself in debt and moved out to the Western part of the country-. Charles L. Cocke, who was 26 years old at the time, gave up his job as the Dean of Students and a math professor at a college in Richmond, to take a job at the seminary. Sight unseen, he traveled across the state of Virginia with his family for five days by horse and wagon to take a position at the seminary. • The pressure of running the seminary was immediately intense for Charles L. Cocke, as he was responsible for alleviating the debt of the seminary. Mr. Bolster stated that Charles L. Cocke was truly a visionary. Despite the extremely deteriorated condifions of the seminary, Cocke was still willing to spend his life savings of $1,500, to satisfy the debt of the seminary. The buildings were run down, the fences were falling, and the sidewalks were overgrown and indistinguishable. The grounds of a once popular resort were now deserted. • Within 3 years, Cocke had about 75 students (45 boys, 30 girls) enrolled in the seminary. Cocke solicited donations from the communityT to make improvements to the grounds. John and Ann Hollins, who owned a mill in Lynchburg, donated a significant amount of moneyT to Charles Cocke in his efforts to relieve the seminary's debt and continue developing the school. In 1855, the Hollins' donated $5,000 which enabled Charles Cocke to built the first "real dorm", believed by Bolster to be North Hall. Due to the Hollins' contribution, Cocke later named the school Hollins Institute, which later led to the name of the community. • After the donation was received, Cocke convinced the Board (for the seminary) to focus on educating women and reverse the status of the seminar~T from co-ed to women's admission only. By the commencement of the Civil war, the college was no longer co-educational. • Charles L. Cocke fought hard to protect Hollins Institute during the Civil War. Bolster recalled a story that has been passed down through generations regarding Cocke writing a letter to the generals of the Union and the Confederacy requesting that they pass by the college leaving the grounds untouched. He stood along the dirt road, now known as Williamson Road/Route 11, for days awaiting the troops, but the troops never passed. • Bolster believes that Hollins Institute established a reputation as a "safe-haven" for girls, as enrollment numbers continued to increase during and after the Civil War. • Charles L. Cocke had intended for his son, Charles HenryT Cocke, to precede him as president of Hollins College. Those plans never came to fruition, because Charles H. Cocke died one-y-ear before his father. Maggie Cocke, daughter of Charles L. Cocke and brother to Charles H. Cocke, continued her father's legacy, becoming the president of the college until 1933. Improving women's education remained the driving force throughout the Cocke family. In 1901, following the death of her father, Maggie Cocke, was successful in having the institute renamed to Hollins College. • Lucian Cocke, another son of Charles L. Cocke, was an attorney who represented Hollins College on a pro Bono basis. He was the first elected mayor of Roanoke Cit<r. 2~Hollins Area Plan Document 2 History of the Hollins Area: An Interview with William (Bill) Henry Bolster Monday, July 7, 2008 • Suzanne Pleasants Turner and her sister, Mari- Van Fossen Turner, established the Communit<- School, which is presently located across from the main entrance to Hollins University along Williamson Road. Turner was the first woman to be a head park ranger along the Blue Ridge Parkway. Hollins University was a supporter of the Communit~T School. • Bill Bolster explained how the Summerdean subdivision received its name. His grandfather, Dr. Hugh Trout, had a nickname for his wife, Lenora Cocke. The nickname was "Dean". The land was originally a farm, and Bill Bolster's grandfather named it Dean's Summerplace. After the death of his wife, Bolster's grandfather remarried. In 1951, the farm was sold to developers, Fralin-Waldron who created the Summerdean subdivision. • Mr. Bolster also identified the location of the "Trout Farm" located along present-day LaMarre Drive. There was a blacksmith shop at the intersection of La Marre Drive and Hugh Avenue. Bill Bolster's maternal uncle, Phil Trout, was an orthopedic surgeon in Roanoke who built the bridge on Hugh Avenue that crosses Carvin Creek, one summer when he was home from college. 3~Hollins Area Plan Document 3 o v So arking o Keystone Lane ~ ~ = Parkingforthephysicallyhantlicappetl Riding Center ©= Entranceforthephysically ~ handicapped (in some buildings nnis courts t ~ ~ access is limited to one floor) playing field e '~dYp7 a2iL ~ r ~ q~e 1sK1 ~' A~~ 7 Tinker '" . ~ ~ ,~ ° Forest Lane ~~ - stud ent parking q eSr aPO<°f of Arden - ~ M 0 d~° + ~I ® Ay °o° , o ea playing field ~ ~~ ®~ faculty ~ O ~• ,° ° ~ ~ :: ~~, & staff ' °© • \e`a e ~ © parking ;~t; nn aamn ov r~~tvPaM~g1 r " ~~ ~ np ,.n ~ 0 m ® ® e®ssionsl•l~s~°`e~ °°° ' , ''1, e ~ m s a par n9 o- acu tY rive ~ ° ° --- ' e•0° e m ~ 1 0 1 ~ // ~ ° 1 ~ / / / 1 F~sn urn ~~~. Beale ' • ~ ~ r. ~ ~ / / © ~,•• ® ® Garden ., r••"' , ~ 1 ii/ :: ® ' '~~ ~_ ~ Baltimore : O © QJy ~ Washington, D.C. harleston mF ~av Lexington ~e SrC Richmond oanos e Hollin d mPUS Drive ' ~ tay Carvin s p Creek ~_ ~ Green.boro 0 ~ tp -d N Charlotte Raleig O To Hollins Apartments U.S. Route 11 (Williamson Road) Undergraduate Admissions in Main Building (78) 1 Annex (Theatre) 2 Athletic Complex (gymnasium, Northen Swimming Center, Tayloe Fitness Center) 3 Barbee House (faculty and guest residence) 4 Botetourt Hall (campus safety office, human resources, dance studios, U.S. Post Office, plant facilities) 5 Bradley Hall (Talmadge Recital Hall, Batten Leadership Institute, Events Planning) 6 Carvin House (student residence) 7 Cocke Memorial Building (offices of the president, provost, business, marketing, public relations) 8 Cromer Bergman Alumnae House (alumnae and development offices) 9 Dana Science Building (Babcock Auditorium) 10 Duchouquet Cottage (faculty residences) 11 duPont Chapel (Chaplain's Office, Cultural and Community Engagement) Graduate Admissions in Eastno~ (13) 12 East Building (Center for Learning Excellence: Writing Center, QR Center; student residence) 13 Eastnor (Graduate and Continuing Studies Center, Horizon Program) 14 Faculty Avenue (faculty residences) 15 Richard Wetherill Visual Arts Center (studio art, art history, film, photography, faculty offices, darkrooms, editing rooms, classrooms) Eleanor D. Wilson Museum 16 Hill Building /Parsonage/ Library Annex 17 La Maison Frangaise (student residence) 18 Main Building (academic services,undergraduate admissions, registrar, scholarships and financial assistance office, Green Drawing Room, student residence) 19 Malvern Hill 20 Moody Center (Ballator Gallery, bookshop, dining room, Rathskeller, snack bar, student affairs) 21 Pleasants Hall (O'Brien Multimedia Classroom) 22 Power Plant 23 President's House 24 Presser Hall (music department) 25 Randolph Hall (student residence) 26 Rathhaus (information technologies) 27 Robbie Hunt Burton Alumnae Cottage 28 Rose Hill 29 Riding Center (Kirby Riding Ring, stables, offices) 30 Sandusky (student residence) 31 Swannanoa Hall (English and creative writing, graduate program in children's literature) 32 Theatre (theatre arts, faculty offices) 33 Tinker House (student residence) 34 Turner Hall (faculty offices, health services, education department, international programs) 35 West Building (Career Center, student residence) 36 Wyndham Robertson Library 2007 ~ Document 3 reater EXIT 146 Roanoke Valle 81 Y EXIT 143 ~~~ To Jefferson National Forest y. /~ EXIT 141 g, EXIT 1401 .,,,na To: Salem (Exit 137) Dixie Caverns (Exit 132) Christiansburg (Exit 118) Q Parl<w¢y C¢mp Ground -y To Smith Mt. Lake POINTS OF INTEREST O Visitors Center © Valley View Mall © Crossroads Mall O Towers Mall © Tanglewood Mall O Roanoke College O Hollins D Salem Civic Center O Roanoke Civic Center To: Troutville (Exit 150A & B) Natural Bridge (exit 175 or 180) Lexington (Exit 188W) To ~~ To Fincastle Peaks of Otter Q 11 Routc 604 N z 460 yTo Lynchburg Mill Mtn Suer & Zoo Ro¢nol<c Mtn A To Mabry Mil] ~'~ ~To Rocky Mount Hollins is on U.S. Route ll (7916 Williamson Road), just off Interstate 81 at Exit 146. Coming from the north on I-81, take Exit 146, turn left onto Plantation Road, go to the first stoplight and turn left onto Williamson Road (Route 11 north), go approximately 1/2 mile, turn left into the campus entrance. Coming from the south on I-81, take Exit 146, turn right onto Plantation Road, go to the first stoplight and turn left onto Williamson Road (Route ll north), go approximately 1/2 mile, turn left into the campus entrance. From Roanoke Regional Airport, turn right on Hershberger Road, take I-581 north for 2.6 miles until it intersects with I-81 north, bear right and take Exit 146, turn right onto Plantation Road, go to the first stop- light and turn left onto Williamson Road (Route 11 north), go approximately 1/2 mile, turn left into the campus entrance. From Greensboro, N.C., take Route 220 north until it runs into I-581 north. Travel 5.4 miles on I-581 until it intersects with I-81 north, take Exit 146, turn right onto Plantation Road, go to the first stoplight and turn left onto Williamson Road (Route 11 north), go approximately 1/2 mile, turn left into the campus entrance. From Fincastle, Covington or Hot Springs, Va. (Route 220 South), take Route 220 south until it intersects with Route 11, turn right at the stoplight and follow Route 11 for 3.5 miles, turn right into the campus entrance. From Lynchburg, Va. (Route 460 west), turn right onto Alternate 220 and travel approximately 5 miles to the intersection of Alternate 220 and Route 11, turn left at the stoplight and travel south on Route 11 for 3.5 miles, turn right into the campus entrance. Revised August28, 2007 ~~ ~'~QN°~`~ Document 4 ~, HOLLINS AREA PLAN ~' z `' A COMMUNITY SURVEY X838 Introduction i~Y e appreciate the time you have taken to participate in the development of an Area Plan for a portion of the Hollins community. This Plan, once adopted, will become part of the County s overall Comprehensive Plan and will play a major role in how the Hollins area z~~ll look in the next 70 to 20 years. Thank you for your assistance in this process! You may either return this paper survey to the Roanoke County Department of Community Development in the envelope provided or you may complete the survey online at www.roanokecountwa.gov/hap using the code located in the upper right corner of this page. Please mail or complete the survey online by May 2, 2008. Getting to Know You Gender: Male Age: Under 18 How long have you owned a business or Female 18-24 lived in the Hollins area? 25-34 less than 5 years Property Type: 35-49 5 to 10 years Business 50-64 11 to 20 years Home 65 or older more than 20 years Community Likes and Concerns What do jrou like the most about your community? What concerns do you have with respect to your community? Matching Grant Program Roanoke County currently runs a program that provides matching funds for business owners to make certain improvements to their properties. If you own a business, would you be willing to make improvements if.. . 50% matching funds (you pay 50%) were available to you? (check one) Yes No 66% matching funds (you pay 33%) were available to you? (check one) Yes No If you answered "Yes" above, what kinds of improvements would you consider making? (check all that apply) Building Facade Updates New Signage Additional Landscaping Improved Lighting (building or parking lot) Parking lot restriping/reconfiguration New site accessories (wooden fences, brick or stone walls, benches, trash receptacles, etc.) Document 4 Development What kinds of new development would you like to see in the Hollins area? (check all that apply) Commercial Industrial Residential None Other (If Oder, please specif~r) Infrastructure What kinds of improvements would you like to see along Williamson and Peters Creek Roads (from the Botetourt County line to Deer Branch Road )? (check all that apply) Sidewalks Im roved Crosswalks with Pedestrian Si nals Bicycle Lanes Bus Routes/Bus Sto s Landsca ed Medians Street Trees lanted ~ust behind the curb Under round Utilities Im roved Road and Pedestrian Li htin Communit<- Si ns elcome to Hollins Li ht Post Banners elcome to Hollins) Other (please specifyr) Street Furniture (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) What kinds of improvements would ~rou like to see along Plantation Road (from I-81 to Williamson Road)? (check all that apply) Sidewalks Im roved Crosswalks with Pedestrian Si nals Bicycle Lanes Bus Routes/Bus Sto s Landsca ed Medians Street Trees lanted ~ust behind the curb) Under round Utilities Im roved Road and Pedestrian Li htin Community Si ns elcome to Hollins Li ht Post Banners elcome to Hollins Other (please specify) Street Furniture (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) Additional Comments Please use this space to provide additional comments. Survey Results, Questions and Additional Information Thank you again fog°yonr input and participation in this survey for the Hollins Area Plan. Your responses to this survey are anonymous. County staff will be compiling the results of the submitted surveys and will make them available on the County's web site (www.roanokecountyvagov~ by Jude 1, 2008. Ifyon have any questions oryou would like to receive a copy of the survey results, please contact the Koanoke County Department of Community Development by mail - 5204 Bernard Dave, Koanoke, VA 24078, by phone - (540 772-2068, by FAX - (540~ 776-7955, or by email - planninQn,roanokecoun,, va.gov. 2 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 Gender No Answer ~. Soth Male ls% 43% Female 41°fa Age No Answer 18-Z4 2534 1% 2% 1% ~fl ~ 35-49 65 or older j 26% ~~ 41% 50-64 `',, ~ Z9% Under 18 0% June 17, 2008 1 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Dacirment 5 June 17, 2008 Property Type No Answer Both 6% 4% susiness 25% ,, 1 Horne 65f How long have you owned a business or lied in the Hollins area? No Answer 1% > 5 yrs 20t yrs 25% 39% 5-10 yrs 11-2(3 yrs 2Q% 15% ~. 2 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 June 17, 2008 What do you like most about your community? ~$ 17 1fi 15 S1 ~ 6 5 5 5 4 \~\~ ta~~e ~`,~e~. ~Q~J~ ~ ~'~ b~{y {y*a ~~~5 ~~~a ~fla~ o~~~ ~e5~ ~`~~ oozy ~0~5 Q~Q} lea ~,~,~~ Qua ~5`~ e.°or C`ile j ca eaQy ~ ~~y~` ~o~ ~~" ~\~,~c~ ec`e 4v ~o~ Qa~ ~` ~~ G~ What concerns do you have with respect to your community? ~z ~~ 9 8 $ -~ 6 6 N ~ - 4 4 4 I - ~ -~ 2 2 i~ . ~~~` ~~~,~ O`ec~' `~c~e `ocy a~GQ ```\~y aJO~ ~s`~e Jy`cq, c~'~~ eoJs ~ ~oQ s~ ma ova ~ma ,` y~S ~o eye \`ao ~~e ~`o~. PQQ ~~ P~Q o~`~~ ~J `sum 5~~~`O `~tyec ~P`~o `r~55 ~ N`' a, ~e ~~a eJ ~t4`a`,~,,o e`Daay1 Q~a~Sti ~~ ~o 3 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 June 17, 2tJ08 Business Owner Gender iVa Answer 5% ,~: r-: Female 25% s~,~ Male 70% .,` ~,: Business Owner Age Na Answer 35-49 5% 15% s_.. .. 65 or older 45 /o ~ 5f]-64 35% L] ~ i' ~ - Under 35 0% Business Owner Property Ownership in Hollins Business and Home 1S% ,~ , Business 85% T . 4 Holilns Community Surrey Analysts Document 5 June 17, 2008 Haw long has your business beerti located in the Hollins area? _ Less than Syears 5-10 years 155& 5"/ 1120 years 10 Would you participate in a 50% Matching Grant Program? No An5L5'er 5655 Yes 35% ~I i No 15% Would you participate in a 66% Matching Grant Program? N o AnsS'zr 20% ~~_,•, Na ~ _ , . .. 555 Yes 75% What Matching Grant improvements would you consider making? 11 11 10 ~~_ 8 ~~ _,. ~ ~ 6 0 w~ c p n ix a ~- a Nety Site ACCe550f1e5 5 f--~ Hollins C©mmunity Surrey Analysis Document 5 What kinds of new de~ueloprnent would you like to see in the Hollins area? ~~ 26 25 14 ~~ ~ New Deueloprr~ent "Other" Responses 14 7 7 '= 6 4 ~, 2 r ~ 1 ~,~a C-~ June 17, 2008 6 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 June 17, 2008 Williamson and Peters Creek Roads Desired Improvements 44 36 35 34 - 33 31 28 25 23 22 ;, 1T 6 ., .; ;,_. e`' ~`' Q5 ~y ~y ~''~ Qo e`' c5 ca 5 ~t ~~•'~` y~pa ~y0 ~•~ ~a\ ~SS~a ,~,~~~` ~a~ {`~2 ~{J h~c"aQ Qtr ~J e.~J e~~ ~a `fie e~2 ti~¢o ~~ w~a 4~c ~~~~' Q ~. ~. echo La~~~ h~a`'a e~ y r ~ y~`\a~ ~•~~~Qo`'`'~~e2~ ° ~~ J~a 4at, ` ~a\~ ~~QQ z ~?~D ~~y4 ~ ioyy ~a~ co,~~G Qa4oa ~~~ Qc© ~~ Plantation Road Desired Improvements 35 34 34 ~; ~, ':~~ 16 15 i I 4 ~ 5 y ~ y ~5 ~ ey g5 5 ce ec ~Q~ `~~~' ~~ac' ~a~~ ~~~~ ~a ~~~ a~ tie ,~04 .\~ ,~r ~cea ~~~~, adz y\aa ~~`~~ tia 5' ~~ `p`~`~~~ v y~~a~ ~b~Sh,~4~~t` O h o~ Qe fi y,~c ,~~~ ~.~ Qo may` ee ~~~ tr`'~a Coca ~'~ ey r'~ ~ ~~ ~fia mac ~ ~ c~4Qa ~,~~ ~y~o h ti ~ 5~a~~~ 4-oaaa~ C,~°y oe~ ,~c ~~ 7 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 Williamson Road Infrastructure "(]then" Comments 3 3 2 i Roads/ Appearance Landscaping Intersections / Other Transportation Plantation Road Infrastructure "Other" Comments I Roads /Intersections / Appearance Other Transportation June 17, 2008 8 Hollins Community Survey Analysis Document 5 Additional Cammen~s so s s ~ ~ 4 4 ~ 3 6 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~r2~ ~ ~{`~' 6J Q. y\~ ~~~~ p~~,a~ ,L~o~ ~~ `yL QQ c, O ~ ~,~, e any` L~~~ ~° ~~ J~ ~e ~s° oa ~r~ to ti~ aQ Q~ June 17, 2008 II r 4 9 ~I I I ~ ' ~~ I I I'i ~ i ~ f I I I `~ I II 7 _ R F ~ I ~ i I II I ~ I I I f I I I ~ ` it ~ I I I • I I IC I i _` I y ~ I I I i ~ I - i I h I - - I E ` I I I p I { - I CI - I - I I I r I I . I - ~ I I 1 I I I -- ~ - ~ f l i ~ i - f i I - , ~ I '~ I~ f I I II ~i r~ U ~ II I ~ I I I I i u j I f I I I ~~ I' I I I I I I ` 1 ~ 1 II ' u 1 II " I I I i I I t I I I I I I ~ ` I I I ~ ~ h r 4 ~ Y II - r I; ' i I i q ~~ I i f I i I ~ I . _ __ i t j I ~ i I I ~ 0 r ~ I l~ ~ I ~ I I I , u4 ~ I [ i I I t I M I I i I ' I I I ~ I I i I I ~ I I I p I I 1 N I I• I I r I i t I ' I II j - I I I" I I r II I i I ~ t I I I I I r ~ I f II J I_ I _ _ I . P I _ _ _ f _ _ _ _ I ~t- I I I ~ I ~ 4 ~~ I ~ I f I 4 f I I ~, ~ ~1~ ~ III ~~ I I I y l I ~ ~ I L I ' I. I ~~ ~, E E ~ ~ E ~k ~- a Ir i, ~ I ~ I 'I I _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I ; ~ Y I h I I k ' ~ I I - - . ~~ I I I j 1 I ' I I G E ' 4 ~ ~ I ~ I ~~ i I I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I h V I I I I ~ I ~ u I C g , I . I I I ~ ~I ~ IIy['I; I I I I I I I @ ~ c 'I I I , I I i ~ ~ ~ I I I I f I I ~ I I i ~ x 1 _ _ i _ _ _ s _ - _ _ _ I~ _-~~ _ ~ _ _ -_ _ ~ ~7 L _ _ 1 r y i t ( I I I I i I ~ f r i lEl I I ' I - ~ I l ~ I l I i b 4 } ` S ~ ~ I ' I ' I I I I I I ~ I I I I i I i , I 'll ~ I E ; i j I J 5 ' ' I N I II ~ f 4 I ~ I I ry 11 f I ~ , I I I r l I i I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ' f I. I h I I 4 1 I N `' I1 b I ~ I ~ i 1 i I I ~ C ~ I i I I ~ ' i I I P i i ~ ~ ; I I I 1 f IIy I `` 1 d I I l I i % ~ ~ ` l ~ i I ; i I k ~ ~ l II ~l ~ I I I I I ~ s C d j4 I II ~ i I I~ I ~ P C ~ ~ I M ~ I I i I lU i I I I y I I 4 I I I ~ ~l I ~ ~ p{ I I _ E I l I i ~ I i i ~ ~ l ~ I ~ ~ l ~ I _ I ~ ~ I I i i I I I r I k ~ I 'I ~ ~~ ,; f . I l V h ~ I I I ~ I i 4 l i V i _ rs - ~ _ i I I l I i I I 1 i j i ~ I P ~ I I l I '~ I i I I I i I . l i I h~ ~i, i ' Y h I I i { l 1 - f V ~ I i r 1 I l I h i ~ I ~ ~ C I I i i i ~ -- -- - - -- - I < ` ~l~ I~ I - - - - - 'py I 1 I _- I ~ I i I ~ I 1 ~ I i I ~ I I I I I I I r Y i I I i i I I I { I I p I I I I i I r I l i I ' `1 ICI r ,~ - N - ~ _ - - - 1 1 _ _ - I ~ I - - i ~ ~ I ~ _ ~ I ~ 1 I I ~ ~ -- - - ~-~, - -- i ' I ~ li - I - ~ ' I I - - I II ,' I I I i J I f i V - - - A h II I ,. Ij M Q i - ' r j I II Is. I ~ y I J I ~ ~ . ~ ~ I I I I ~ '`, r I I • I I l I I ~ I ' ' I ~ I I 1I ` I I M I - -_ ; -- II - ~~ -- _ - _ -- ---- - - , ~ r - ~ -- , r I II I I i l I s I ~ I ~ ~ I t I ~ ~ i ~ U I p r p i I I ~ 'i i ~ ' , I;I .. ~ I I ' I I ~ ~ q F I I ~I I ~' ~ II , i ~ I ~ ~ I It I I i k Ih r I I 1 I I - - - - I' ~ I -- ~ ~ I1~ 0 -- I - - ~ ~ -- ~ - I ~ - ~ I' ~ ~ ~I t I - i I I I ~ I i - I I I !. 1 I lc -- I I I I li ~ I I ~ I I I ` I h I I ^ I I " ~ I I MI I I i I E i I I I I I I I~ I I ~ I II ~ I i SS~~ l I ~ I I I I 5 I I II ~ I I 1 i ~ I I I I I, ~ ~ I, I `` II I I II II I I I f f I I ~i ` I l I I ' i S 5 I I I I M l I I I I ' I 1 i II 6 I li ' I ~ II I .. F ~ II i I l I I ! I I f I I I l -, _ I _ , _. , _ I - - I _ + i I I . '~ r ` I I i I I ~ V ' I j I l I I I I I I NN ' p ; _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ! I I III I ~~ , I II YI i I, II I 'I II~I ~~ I - ~ ~ I I I ~ I I li 1 ~ i a a I i i I - -~ 1 I - - - - I - - - -- J f , I ' i ~, I I n S I ~ I ) ' I I I I i I 5~ ~. .. _ -. -~ _ II I ~ y i l I I I r' I ~ I 4 F I III I I ~< ~; - - - ~ ~ ~ _~ - - - -- ~ - - __ ' ~~ ~ ~ + .~ - _ '~ i 4 ~ p 1 I - - ~ - - ~ -- ~ , - ~ l ,. ~ i ` I i II ' + i ~ i III { II i ~ n~ I` ~ i i I ~I ' i I ' i ~ I - I i 1 I I ` i i ~ i I i I i I I I i .~ ~ I~ , 7 J 'Q ~ I ` ~ ill I ` ~ f it ~ ' `~ ' ~ U ~ I s G ~r ~ ~ i ~ ~ J ~ ~ I ~ ~ V ,~ - ~ - I , i ~ ' ~ ~, '~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ r I - ~ 7 i ~ ~~i ' I I i Y ~ ~ ~ ii ' ~ - t - - ~ i - - I f' ~ a - ; I~ ~ '~ ~ i ~ ~~- ~ - ~ I' ICI I i - Y. ~ _.. .. ~ .,. .. .._ f . i ~ ~_ €; C Document 6 Hollins University Student Survey Questions 1. Are you a/an... Undergraduate Student Horizon Student Graduate Student 2. What is your age range? 17-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56+ 3. Where do you live during the academic year? On-campus Off-campus 4. Do you have a car? Yes No 5. When you leave campus, how do you get to your destination? Drive Yes No Walk Yes No Bicycle Yes No Hollins Shuttle Yes No Taxi Yes No Other Yes No If yes, how many times per week? Drive 1-3 4-6 7 + Walk 1-3 4-6 7 + Bicycle 1-3 4-6 7 + Hollins Shuttle 1-3 4-6 7 + Taxi 1-3 4-6 7 + Other 1-3 4-6 7 + 6. Do you walk to nearby destinations on Williamson Road? Yes No (If you answered yes, answer question 7. If no, skip to question 8.) 7. If you answered "yes" to question 6, please answer the following... Are better crosswalks needed? Yes No Are more sidewalks needed? Yes No Is better lighting needed? Yes No Other (please specify) 8. Do you have (and ride) a bicycle? Yes No (If you answered yes, answer question 9. If no, skip to question 10.) March, 2008 9. If you answered "yes" to question 8, please answer the following... Do you ride your bike on area roads? Yes No If bike lanes were provided in the Hollins area, would you ride your bike to your destination? Yes No Document 6 Hollins University Student Survey Questions March, 2008 10. When you leave campus, what kinds of places do you go to (other than home or to work)? (select all that apply) Grocery store/Drug store Restaurants/Coffee Shops Shopping Centers/Malls Movie Theaters/Bowling/Other Entertainment Personal Services (Beauty Salon, Nail Salon, Tanning) Parks/Trails/Recreation Doctors/Healthcare Other (please specify) 11. What places do you go to most often? 1) 2) 3) 12. What is your favorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley? 13. If public transportation (bus or train) had a stop at Hollins University, would you use the service to visit the places identified in questions 10, 11 and 12? Yes No 14. When your parents come to visit, where do you go? 1) 2) 3) 15. What kinds of businesses would you like to see in the Hollins University area? Hollins University Student Survey Results Document 7 Hollins University Student Type Graduate Student 11% _ Horizon Student " "' loco .:~,.: Undergraduate Student 79% ;~ ~:_ L. 3~- What is your age range? 40 `"'" 41-45 46-5D 51-55 56 and over 31-35 1%a .., 1%~ 2~ o ~ 1% 4°1 \\ 2b-30 17-20~'` 51°1n Where do you live during the academic year? Off-campus ~~a~ On-campus 74% July 28, 2008 1 Hollins University Student Survey Resu{ts Dacliment 7 When you lease campus, how do you get to your destination? 8~ ~ 37% 26% 8/0 7% 10% J i Drive 1Nalk Hollins Taxi Bicycle Other Shuttle Do you have a car? N4 29°!a Yes 71% ~i>~" - _,~ ,, . How often do you leave campus in your car? 48% i G C -.. 12 f ~~ ~_ --- ~" ~- i r 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week July 28, 2008 2 Hollins University Student Survey Results Document 7 Haw often da you leave campus by walking? 8oio ~~.~- '~ 13% 7% l_ . 1-3 tomes per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week Would you use public transportation bus or train} to access your destination if it stopped at Hollins University? N^ 33 J Yes ~7l6 ~` July 28, 20Q8 Hollins University Student Survey Results Dacurnent 7 Da y©u bane hand rides a bicycle? How often do you leave campus by bicycle? 72% 17% 11% - - a_ ~ u - 1-3 tunes per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week July 28, 2008 4 Hollins University Student Survey iiesults Document 7 How often do you lease campus by the Hollins Shuttle? 95% ~. ~. ~ _. 5~° ©fo ~. 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week How often do you learre campus by taxi? 1©~% e% o% ,• 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week How often do you leaue campus by other means? 83% 17% ~' ~ Q% %~ ---- ~. 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week July 28, 2008 5 Hollins University Student Survey Results Document 7 Do you walk to nearby destinations on Williamson Road? Yes 44% N© 55% ,` ~~ ~. r' Williamson Road infrastructure needs according to walkers Better Sidewalks Better Better Lighting Other Crosswalks "other" responses for Williamson Road infrastructure needs according to walkers 6 5 5 4 1 r yy~~~~5 ~~~~~~, eta 4 1 ~' ~ ~ 5 ~ July 28, 243x8 6 Hollins University Student Survey Results Document 7 Bicycle riders, dv yvu ride your bike an area roads? Yes. Na 47% 53°1° `~ Bicycle riders, if bike lanes were prorrided in the Hollins area, vuould you ride your bike to your destination? No 13% ~'.:~_ Yes ~7% _, r . July 28, 2008 7 Hollins University Student Survey Results Document Z When you iea~e campus, what kinds of places do you go to (other than home or work?) 239 z22 221 ,~. i lb9 .~ i r 98 ~ 86 ~~ 72 l 40 i } - ~ ~. ~- - - - ,~ ~e ~ ~~y ~~, cQ a~ ~ ~t 5'`° `r°~ ~`a cue •c~a a'~~ c``~ O'er 004 ~~y~~ `'r~ ~~c \ ~ ~ a~4~r~ o~ ~~~ ~~ ~ e~~ ~° ~~5 ©c ~~ Q~ What is your farrorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley? 53 37 32 24 16 16 13 11 10 9 -~ - ~ ~ 3 3 d 2 `~ , ~~ a~~S .\~e ~~4 yac e~w as~~~o~et`'\~~\4~"~~ Qy~a'~~~ ~~a~ ~~~a~~~ac ~ Gel ~`o ~ o~ ~~~ ~a~. o~'~`~~ \~~o~ea ~\ ogre, F. C~ ~,r a~5 ~\ 0 ~~e ~~ ~~~~e lcoQs ~0~~5 boo ~o~~~ owe ~~r ~'~``'~ ~°~~ ado oJ~~ ~e~~~ L ~~\~ore~ July 28, 2D08 FSo{lins University Student Survey Results Doc~~mcnt 7 July 28, 2008 What places do you go most often? (#1 Ranking) loo 57 31 1 12 lp 11 6 6 2 2 2 ~_ ea a~~' oay o`er SQ ~¢ ~~Q oc~' tQy yQ~' ra< ~yo cs\~ ayr y~ ~+e+~ ,t,° ~a~5 y~ae °~y4o ~°a p~ a ; 4`°t¢~\~t~`°~ ar~c~'~~\`°`Se a~¢a"QC\ ~°J~Qy°~ was ~o ~`~~ay ~S\ Q,~t What places do you go most often? {#2 Ranking} 64 ~~\5 ~e`+ °QS ~~'~ ~c . yc yy ~+k- es cti y5 e ~s ~r g5 °a ~~s¢~y\q`J~`o~a c`~a~O°s'`,~oc\~}e~@°°!y~°s ~oa~~°~5 Q¢~\~~°s ~o Qo~tio `°~aSe~~c 4~r ~ ~5 \ F, a a t 5P °QQc ~~y°~a°aac~y4~\e~ ~Q`~Q ~\~Q~ O,~~z Qy~ .5\ a ~o ~~5 `S\ ea Q '` a ,~r¢ sa ty'° What places do you go most often? {#3 Ranking] so 7 4 5 5 4 4 3 I: Fl l~ i ~ a 2. 2, 2~ ~~~, e'' 4 r °~ c to es as e`' ~~ ,Fe e c5 ~s ~ et CS`a 5~°t q'~`°~ c~°~.~Fa ea~° Lr4a e`~~L o~~ 5ti°t S`~° ~a~ J.~a~~a~`° y~°~ tQ° p~`1 c~et5Q4~G °~~ey 4°~ ~~~ ~e~~ ~aa~ a~5 eye a~3 ~c a~5 ®®°~ P c~ e °~a4\ °~y\L ~`~~,. `~~y\ ``°~5 Q~`~°Qa`aL~~ etF ~tac (~ `°44` e~y~ ~aJ4a ~~~ a~s~ p° cas\ O 0 e`'\~ n S` n° Hollins University Student Survey Results Doc~-ment 7 When parents come to visit, where do you go? (#1 Rank) 79 ~~ s 36 24 ' 10 ~5 a~ Q5 ~c ~~w5 e~ ~e ee. `a~ ~° ~\ °~ ~ °~ ,~a g ° ~ Qa ~4 \ ~ ~ o a eS~ ~ S ~ e4a o° `Q` `k'e° a~~ ~ ° t` 5~ c° e fi a ` C. a ~ ~ ~ ~t ,~~ y~ ~~ o ~ a r ~ 5 When parents come to visit, where do you go? (#2 Rank 46 34 17 16 15 ,~: i '` ' 3 3 Z ~ r, -~~. ~ ~ ~ i , . ~y~~ai\4 e r°~~ s~~~°~c c,ea~~°~ o,~'~°{e~ a ~e~~ `~°~~y c~ \\a~e w`'ee`~a, o~rei °~Q`~~ e Jt ~~y+~f, c~a`~ta~5~~~°`e5\°ae~~~~ 4~,~~, ~~a a ~ 5r ~e5'`a Qa ~°ce~ ~ c~ When parents come to visit, where do you go? (#3 Rank) Z6 18 13 8 7 7 10 i~a~y °~~ a~~y a`~~ °te~ ,~,°~ 4~5 Neva ~a~e ~e~ °ce~' ~cr cre~ t~`C` ~~~„ ~aJC. ~O ~~'t, Gila O,~t~^ .~.° ~ ~ ~O \rj't. G.~. O e~Le ~o wee Q~° e~`~e s~v c~. .\,e5 era ~`~~ `~~°ce5\ Qa~,~ ~,,a~ eta 4e\a~, ~ Qt~- r f~`~° ~° July 28, 2008 10 00 0 N Cp cV _A 7 n U O A N a v a~ ,s 0 f\ I ~y'~O ~ ~ N ~ s~4 ~ .~ o m I ~ 8 ~a ~~ = m s ~"~- a~ ~ ~ ~ I s a ~a Gi ~ m ~ s ~~'o ~''4 ) a~ ~ ~ .~ ' ~'o ~a~-r s~~ a~ p J sa ~ ,~ ~ ' " , ~ s ad ~s a sa ~',rh ~a~~° ~~aj M1. b ! ~ ~ p A s a ado i~ ~ ,% s $~p o!i~ ~ O a (¢ ! ~ O/, S a~~?%,a ~~sG~~ ~ ~ ; ~' ~ s,, ~d %~ ~~ ~/~~ 02 cn ~ ~ I N ~ a~o~ ~~~4 S%O ~~~~ sa o s cn ~ ~ ~ ~ _ u, ~ ga ~ aw' • 2 of a ~a~~ s~a4 ~ ~ n r' N ay ~~+` A '~a a a~s,~ /'~~ N ~ 1. /j T O ar~' Ys ~~',, /J~o1 c/f ~ ~ N ~- s 3~ ~~'i a~ ~~ -f~ O i h `y ~ ' ~ ~ ° ~ a ~ is a J c sqo ~h~ ~''a ~9 y o1s ~~ ~ ++ .~ b; __ ,. I a a~ ~'a ,r a a ,, ~4p ~s~'a ~~s~.. 4a~~ n , Ji~~ E;~a a~~~ d a~ ~~, o N \ S~~ ~ ~ ~~ '~sa b 3 ~7n .`, q` ~~~ :. I I I `~ II 14 I ~ ~ ~ I I i ~~ ~ f ~ ~° ~i r A~ i 'au ~• ~t ,~ ~t .. - r~ I ~~ ~n°° :: ~~ r~. ~~ ~~ Document 8 Hollins University Faculty/Staff/Administration Survey Questions 1. Are you a/an... Faculty Staff Administration 2. What is your age range? 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56+ 3. Where do you live during the academic year? On-campus Off-campus 4. Do you have a car? Yes No 5. When you leave campus, how do you get to your destination? Drive Yes No Walk Yes No Bicycle Yes No Taxi Yes No Other Yes No If yes, how many times per week? Drive 1-3 4-6 7 or more Walk 1-3 4-6 7 or more Bicycle 1-3 4-6 7 or more Taxi 1-3 4-6 7 or more Other 1-3 4-6 7 or more 6. Do you walk to nearby destinations on Williamson Road? Yes (If you answered yes, answer question 7. If no, skip to question 8.) 7 If you answered "yes" to question 6, please answer the following... Are better crosswalks needed? Yes Are more sidewalks needed? Yes Is better lighting needed? Yes Other (please specify) 8. Do you have (and ride) a bicycle? Yes No (If you answered yes, answer question 9. If no, skip to question 10.) 9. If you answered "yes" to question 8, please answer the following... Do you ride your bike on area roads? Yes No If bike lanes were provided in the Hollins area, would you ride your bike to your destination? Yes No No No No No March, 2008 Document 8 Hollins University Faculty/Staff/Administration Survey Questions March, 2008 10. When you leave campus, what kinds of places do you go to (other than home or to work)? (select all that apply) Grocery store/Drug store Restaurants/Coffee Shops Shopping Centers/Malls Movie Theaters/Bowling/Other Entertainment Personal Services (Beauty Salon, Nail Salon, Tanning) Parks/Trails/Recreation Doctors/Healthcare Other (please specify) 11. What places do you go to most often? 1) 2) 3) 12. What is your favorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley? 13. If public transportation (bus or train) had a stop at Hollins University, would you use the service to visit the places identified in questions 10, 11 and 12? Yes No 14. When guests come to visit, where do you go? 1) 2) 3) 15. What kinds of businesses or amenities would you like to see in the Hollins University area? Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 Hollins University Affiliation Administration 16°/° Faculty 42% ~~ Staff 4z% :~.~ What is your age range? Prefer not to answer 21-25 26-30 2% 2°~ 5% 56 and over '` 31-35 25% 12°~ 36-40 13% 51-55 13% 41-45 46-50 14% 14% Where do you lure during the academic year? No Response 3~° On-campus 16% r~~ .,, -. .~. Off-campus 81% t `~. v,,. July 24, 2008 1 Hollins University Staff Suruey Analysis Document 9 When you lease campus, haw do you get to your destination? ~~r 19% 3% --- -p/o 3% a ~ Drive Walk Bicycle Taxi Other Do you have a car? Np 2%0 Yes 98% -'. ,~;. ~` ~ How often d© you lease campus in your car? 8% ~/~ ff 74% I~ I ~- --- 1-3 times per week ~4-6 times per week 18% ~~ ~'` ~~ 7 or mere times per week. July 24, 20(}8 2 Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 Wow often do you lease campus by walking? 87% _ ..a r _ i I 9% 4% 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or mare times per week Would you use public transportation (bus or train) to access your destination if it stopped at Hollins University? Yes No 48% 52% ,,~ ~. July 24, 2008 3 Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 Do you have (and rides a bicycle? Yes z4ro ~, N© 76% How often do you leave campus by bicycle? Zaa~>o i oio of ~, 1-3 times per week 4-6 times per week 7 or more times per week 9uiy 24, 2008 4 Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 do you walk to nearby destinations on Williamson Road? Yes 32% No 68% Williamson Road infrastructure needs according to walkers 84% $4% i 61% ~~ 18% Better Better Better Lighting Qther Crosswalks Sidewalks "other" responses for Williamson Road infrastructure needs according to walkers ,. t ~ ,, ~I 1 1 1 ~F -~ _~~_ 5`~~ ~~ 2~`'~a ~~~r ova ~~~ ~y~ ,`~a ~5 ~~ July 24, 200$ 5 Hollins Uni~2rsity Staff Surrey Analysis Doctarnent 9 Bicycle riders, do you ride your bike an area rands? Na 39% Yes 61R~'o ~ I ~R Bicycle Riders, if bike lanes were provided in the Hollins area, would y©u ride your bike to your July 24, 2008 6 destination? No ,r Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 When you lea-~e campus, what kinds of places do you go to bother than home or work?) 106 100 84 77 54 46 4S ~ 23 I, i ;~ ~04~5 roQs ~a.~5 ~~\oc ~~oc,~' ca~~ Q~~ ~~ec C~4a~~`a~Q`~y~a~{a yro~~~ ea`~y~'`~~~~ti~ O~\`~\Q~r ~,~ o Z~~e~~ ~~ iy\~ ~°~. ~r~ @~~ ~`~ ~o What is your favorite place to go in the Roanoke Valley? 34 13 8 8 7 ~ 6 - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5~ 41'.I 3~ a~e~ a~\o~ \\~~e t~~w5 ~~~y ode ~a~~5 ote~ O~r~~ ~' ~L~ec \ ~ '~ o~ ,eta C~ ~~'~ `oe .~r Ju€y 24, 2008 Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Doci~n~ent 9 July 24, 2pp& What places do you go most often? (#1 Ranking) ss ~s 6 ~~`~~`o`Q~~ ~,coQi~` ~~~~y ~OF z s\ `~~~Loi~yy0 ~ c``'\\a Q\c~ e~ Ja ~ ~~o ~'e 4 ~ ~ 2 2 2 -r ~ e ~~`~la~,c\~~\cOo~~~o~~ o~r~c .~ What places do you go most often? (#2 Ranking) ~~ h`n~e4 yroQs ~a~~5 o`~S\o``1 o c L~~r~ ¢La`5 L e 2 a Q Cs~o4¢C~~~~~a s~~ro ~• 6 O~ Oo~~ ~ oca\52 Qa ~~ a` J O Qe What places do you go most often? ~#3 Ranking) >,s ~~ - a v q q c as m 3 r o c cn ;n ~ y ~ ~ ,n ~ O o° d ~ y _ `a ~ v u v ~ o v a0 U' ~ ~~ a H c c m s ~ .Q = o ~ ° ,~ c 4 'S ° ~ m ~ ~ a ~ 8 Hollins University Sta(f5urvey Analysis Document 9 Jufy 24, 2Q~8 When guests come to visit, where do you go? (#1 Rank) ~2 25 15 ~. g 7 5 ~- '/ 3~ 4~ ~~~~ a~~s ~t°c ~a~ ads ~rec ~` ~e~ ~a arc yea acv- ~ \O O c ~ When guests come to visit, where do you go? (Rank #2) za 16 lp 9 -I~~S~~a -- o a~ ~ ~y t •` e t ~a~\o a~ ~r°4 ~a~. 4~,~~ ~\`ao~ QL,~e \~acc ~~-~~ ~~ee `e`5\ ~\Qy\ a~ ,<ca`y °~°\L cry\c'o ~$ eo ~° ~~afi Qa~ Q°~ ~eSSaJ y"°°4 When guests come to visit, where do yr~u go? (Rank #3) 11 s 2 - ~- S~°QS ~Shaa O`rec ~ a~°~ ~a~~~ a~~e~ s`a~e O~r~c e a °i~Qe ~Qa ~\~~~ Pe°~ o`~cS\ `,~~ ca\c Q-e~~a~~a° ~~J ~°,~, Qa~~~C~r°~~~~Q°~c,~° 9 Hollins University Staff Survey Analysis Document 9 July 24, 20x8 What kinds of businesses or amenities would you like to see in the Hollins University area? s3 44 22 21 19 i 15 12 5 5 - -. - .. - ~. ~_ 4~- 3~ ~. ~, c'`~ ~a~ °Qh ~~h e~~ {e5 c~~ `°~ .°~ a~~ °te ,~~~ °ey aye r,~c ey~a~ ~~e{ tae °a~he~a~~~°°,~ r~~~O~~Q°t~ 5Q°`~ ~°~• e~`~ Gray a~~a~ L~~a O ~- \ y\ C~ a~° ~o 10 K ~l ~,-a ~i ?{ e"` ~' ~~ ,~~ ~~ x~qq ~3 ~~ ~.~ m~ ~. 1mS :,; S F ~; a 4' 6, u a '~ ' 6 P ~~ ~~ ,~~ ~~ ~_ ',, ~; ~ S I ~~ ~f ~~ 4 ~€ 11 n .~ ~i .:'~ ~~ e. ~~ ~: ' ~~ i I I } I' ~ ~ ` , I a ~ i~ P i I ~ I ° I. ~ ' ~ I ~ , I i I V j I I I I ~I I ~ ~ 'I ' '~ ~ I - I I ' 4 I~ II I I ~ IIIIM I I I I I i I I ~ ~ ~ _ I I I I II II ~~ i I ' ~ I a , ` ' I ~ .. Y I ` II I ~ I I I I ~I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I i~ JI 1 I 11 ~ ICI i ~ I II 1 I ~' 1 I ~' . I ' I ' i ~ I r I Ilgy I I~ i i [ I ~ I lu I i ~I II I II II ' . ' I i ~ ' ' I I I ~ I ' I I I I I t I • } ~ l_ V ~ I ~ I II I :, I,, I 4 i I i t I I I ~ ~ h ~ I t ~ i ~~ 'i i{ I I I I ~ _~ i ~ I V I I I '. - i1 L i ~ ~ ~ I I ~ r ~ I ~ I _ I ' I . ! ~:~ ~ ~ ~ . ~" ~r I ~ ~ ~ J I ~ i i e ^ c m ~ ^ ~ ~~ ~ _ - Document 10 Hollins Area Plan Update May 7, 2008 Comments from April 28, 2008 Hollins Area Plan Community Meetings Land Use/Development Comments 1. Hollins Manor -residents crossing Williamson Road day and night. Terrible safety issue - due to get worse with development. 2. Consideration of amending the future land use map for the two larger parcels adjacent (and north) of Hollins Court (Bowers Tract) to a less intense use. Environmental Comments 1. Storm water buffer to reduce chemicals into storm drains 2. More Trees Greenways, Topography and Open Space Comments 1. Provide a 500' [buffer] each side of Carvin Creek 2. Minimum number of red lights 3. No big high lights -use low light on ball fields 4. Parking for access to greenway -where proposed? 5. Security for greenways; call boxes; emergency response Questions Raised 1. Will ecology be considered as well as aesthetics? I.e. street tree placement, medians, chemical runoff 2. Pedestrian signalization at intersections, specifically the Williamson Road/Plantation Road intersection 3. Encourage safer pedestrian conditions within the study area particularly with regard to Hollins Manor residents 4. Funding mechanisms for desired improvements 5. Timelines for improvement completion 6. Status regarding proposed developments in the area (Roanoke Motor Lodge and Team Hollins property) 7. Drainage issues and VDOT involvement 8. I-81 interchange status 9. Plans for Waldron Park Document 11 Hollins Area Plan Update August 5, 2008 Comments and Questions from July 31, 2008 Hollins Area Plan Community Meeting Approximately 21 people attended the 7pm Community Meeting at Hollins University. The following comments and questions were raised at the end of the meeting: Implementation -Previous plans were proposed and were not implemented, how will things be implemented this time? Medians -Concerns over maintaining the current medians. Who is responsible for maintaining medians? VDOT plans - Rt. 11 widening plans were done at central office (Richmond). Drainage was not done correctly. Previous businesses -Trying to attract business to the area, but Arby's and Cracker Barrel were rejected by the County (in the citizens' opinions). Taxes -What will happen to our assessments? Will taxes be increased as a result of the study's recommendations? Guarantees -What guarantees are there that any of the recommendations will take place? Cemetery -Old Tombstone Cemetery -Would like some assistance from the County on maintenance at the cemetery. Survey Recipients -Who was the survey mailed to? One person in the audience did not receive a survey even though they are in the study area. Coordination -How well do the County and VDOT work together on projects? Some traffic safety concerns near CVS. Signage -Concerns over signage throughout the corridor. Original plan was to have all the signs be similar in style and size. Service Roads -Will service roads be incorporated into the plan to provide access to businesses? Document 12 ROANOKE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS UNIVERSITY A future land use area that would guide a mix of educational, institutional, limited commercial, recreational, and open space uses related to a college or university campus. University areas are applied to lands owned by Hollins University and integral/contiguous to the central campus. Other lands owned by the University maybe included in other future land use designations that are more appropriate to their existing or future land uses. Proposed land uses adjacent or in close proximity to the University designated areas should be encouraged to compliment the Hollins University architectural and land design themes, and university activities. LAND USE TYPES UNIVERSITY CAMPUS Various agricultural, open space, recreational, civic, office, and limited commercial uses associated with the operation of a college or university. A high degree of architectural design and creative site design is encouraged. Historic structures should be preserved and used as a design theme for future development. SPECIAL EVENTS AND RECREATION Various school-sponsored and community-based sports and recreational opportunities. LAND USE DETERMINANTS EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN Locations where Hollins University development has occurred or is planned. EXISTING ZONING Locations where existing zoning permits educational facilities SURROUNDING LAND USE Locations where surrounding land uses are complimentary to, and compatible with a university campus. HISTORIC AREAS The central core of Hollins University contains (number) buildings on the National Register of Historic Places, and several other structures that could be designated on the Historic Register. ACCESS Locations served by an arterial street system. Document 12 TOPOGRAPHY Locations that can be developed in an environmentally sensitive manner and that are outside of the designated floodplain. URBAN SERVICES Locations where public water and sanitary sewer exist or are planned. SPECIAL EVENTS Locations that have adequate physical facilities for various school and community special events. Document 13 -Schedule of Implementation Strategies Timetable Responsible Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Implementation Strategy Party(ies) 0-5 yrs 6-10 yrs 10+yrs Commercial Matching Grant Program Revise the Program's criteria RC ^ Expand the boundaries of the Program RC ^ Entrance Corridor Develop and adopt an Entrance Corridor Overlay District RC ^ Greenways Construct the shared Hollins University / Roanoke County parking lot for Hollywood's Restaurant and the Greenway HU, RC ^ Construct Hollins University Segment of Tinker Creek Greenway, Phase I (Williamson Road to I-81) HU, RC ^ Construct Hollins University Segment of Tinker Creek Greenway, Phase II (I-81 to Carvins Cove) HU, RC ^ Historic Resources Include additional buildings on Hollins University on the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmarks Register HU, RC, DHR ^ ^ Develop and adopt a Hollins University Historic Overlay District HU, RC ^ Maintenance Programs Ensure the maintenance of landscaping and other streetscape improvements throughout the study area B, HU, PO, RC, VDOT ^ ^ ^ Pedestrian Amenities Improve the pedestrian crosswalks at Plantation Road and Williamson Road RC, VDOT ^ Improve the pedestrian crosswalks at Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road RC, VDOT ^ Improve the pedestrian crosswalks at Williamson Road and Campus Drive HU, RC, VDOT ^ ^ streetscape Improvements Construct and install streetscape improvements (sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, signage, street furniture, etc.) throughout the study area B, HU, PO, RC, VDOT ^ ^ ^ Transportation Improvements Incorporate bicycle lanes along Williamson Road and Plantation Road where feasible RC, VDOT ^ ^ Expand transit opportunities to the study area when and where feasible RC, HU ^ ^ ^ Viewshed Conservation Identify critical viewsheds from and within the study area RC ^ Encourage conservation easements on private lands and acquire scenic easements through grant funding to protect critical viewsheds RC, PO, HU ^ ^ ^ Document 13 -Schedule of Implementation Strategies Abbreviations: B -Businesses DHR - VA Dept of Historic Resources HU -Hollins University PO -Property Owners RC -Roanoke County VDOT - VA Dept of Transportation PETITIONER: Theodore J. Foster CASE NUMBER: 06-4/2008 Board of Supervisors Consent 1St Reading Date: October 28, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 3, 2008 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2"d Reading Date: November 11, 2008 A. REQUEST To obtain a Special Use Permit in an R-1, Low Density Residential District, for the purpose of constructing a private stable on 5.801 acres located at 4535 Red Barn Lane B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Four citizens spoke in opposition of the special use permit. One citizen submitted a petition signed by seven property owners in the surrounding area who were not in favor of the special use permit. All of the citizens were dissatisfied with the petitioner's plans for managing the animal waste. One citizen inquired about the location of the fecal pile and voiced concerns regarding runoff on adjacent properties. Several citizens voiced the following concerns: (1) the proposed use would change the residential character of the area, (2) three horses would create the potential for overgrazing, and (3) the proposed use would devalue adjacent properties. One citizen noted that he was unaware of the dimensions for the run-in shelter. Another citizen had concerns with electric and barbed wire fencing. Mr. Foster indicated that barbed wire fencing would not be utilized. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Azar opened the discussion with concerns regarding the petitioner's plan to manage the animal waste. He noted that the properties in the surrounding area were served by private well and septic. Mrs. Hooker asked the petitioner to clarify the dimensions of the run-in shelter. Mr. Radford and Mr. Jarrell voiced concerns with overgrazing and asked the petitioner for reassurance that the pasture would not be denuded. Mr. Foster stated that he would utilize rotational grazing methods and supplement the horses' diets to prevent overgrazing. Mr. Azar also raised concerns regarding whether three horses were inappropriate for the amount of proposed fenced acreage. He felt that the citizens' concerns were not adequately addressed by the petitioner. D. CONDITIONS 1. The existing garage located at the northwest corner of the property shall not be used in conjunction with the private stable. 2. A maximum of 3 horses shall be permitted with the private stable. 3. The existing tree coverage and foliage along the property lines shall be maintained. 4. The run-in shelter shall be removed from the property upon discontinuance of the private stable use. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. Azar made a motion to recommend denial of the special use permit. The motion passed by a vote of 4-1. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Jarrell acknowledged the concerns regarding the potential for overgrazing. He noted that four of the seven citizens who signed the neighborhood petition in opposition to the special use permit were present at the public hearing. Mr. Jarrell disagreed that the special use permit would devalue properties in the surrounding area. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission (11/7/2008) Mary Brandt -Withdrawal of Private Stable Application -Foster Page 1 From: Ted Foster ~ To: Lindsay Blankenship <Iblankenship@roanokecountyva.gov>, <mbrandt@roanoke... Date: 11 /7/2008 7:53 AM Subject: Withdrawal of Private Stable Application -Foster November 6, 2008 Theodore Foster 4535 Red Barn Lane Roanoke, VA 24012 540-904-2240 Dear Board of Supervisors, I respectfully request that my proposal for a private stable be withdrawn at this time. I regret any inconvenience that this decision imposes on the Board of Supervisors. Please contact me if there is any further information or action required. Sincerely, Theodore Foster Get 5 GB of storage with Windows Live Hotmail. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_ho~tmail_acq_5g b_112008 PETITIONER: American Electric Power CASE NUMBER: 23-11/2008 Board of Supervisors Consent 1St Reading Date: October 28, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 3, 2008 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2"d Reading Date: November 11, 2008 A. REQUEST To rezone 13.103 acres from C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, to I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing a construction yard located at the 1800 block of Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS One citizen spoke opposing the request. Mr. Jeffrey EII noted his concern with Louise Wells Drive being utilized as a construction road and its condition after completion of the proposed storage yard. Mr. EII was also concerned with landscaping along AEP's eastern border and property value effects on adjoining residential uses. Mr. EII stated that he does not think the Core land use designation supports industrial uses and that noise levels will rise in the immediate area. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Timothy Beard presented the staff report. Mr. Azar stated that he would abstain from voting on this petition due to his status as an AEP employee. Ms. Hooker asked about the continuation of existing conditions from the applicant's 1987 petition. The two referenced items are specific to the 13.103 acres subject to this rezoning (as opposed to the remaining 33+acres already zoned I-2, High Intensity Industrial). Ms Hooker inquired about security for residential neighbors and if AEP would have by-right expansion options. New landscaping will replace plantings lost to storage yard expansion and if the concept plan is proffered, only the construction yard use would be allowed. Mike Rakes, engineer with Spectrum Design representing AEP, stated the lower elevation of the expanded storage area and landscaping will aid in making the area difficult to see from neighboring residences and motorists along Loch Haven Drive. Mr. Rakes stated that AEP will proffer the concept plan. Regarding onsite security, Mr. Rakes noted that proposed lighting intensity will not be excessive. Sondra Stevens with AEP stated that nighttime operations will rarely occur in the expanded construction yard and associated noise and lighting will be kept to a minimum. D. CONDITIONS 1. In connection with its development of the subject property, Appalachian Power Company will landscape the property substantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan attached hereto, identified by drawing number SKA-4002 PL, dated March 3, 1987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on the Planting Plan will be landscaped at the time of initial site grading so as to comply with "Type E" requirements of the Roanoke County Screening and Buffering Ordinance. 2. If Appalachian Power Company has not, by February 1, 1993, commenced construction of improvements on the portion of land rezoned B-1, Office District, in accordance with a site plan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County officials, and if no extension of such deadline is granted by Roanoke County on request of Appalachian Power Company, Appalachian Power Company will promptly offer the portion of land rezoned B-1 for sale at its appraised fair market value. 3. The subject area shall only be used for construction yard purposes substantially in accordance with the concept plan prepared by Spectrum Design, dated August 14, 2008. E. COMMISSION ACTION Ms. Hooker made a motion to recommend approval of the request with three conditions. The motion passed 4-0-1 with Mr. Azar abstaining. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Address of Subiect Properties: 1810 Loch Haven Drive Tax Map IVos.: 036.10-01-14.03-0000 Present Zoning: C-1C, Office District with Conditions Proposed Zoning: I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District with Conditions Applicants I~tame: Sondra A. Stevens Owner: American Electric Power PROFFERS The undersigned owner/applicant does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with rezoning application: 1. In connection with its development of the subject property, Appalachian Power Company will landscape the property substantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan attached hereto, identified by drawing number SKA-4002 PL, dated March 3, 1987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on the Planting Plan wilt be landscaped at the time of initial site grading so as to comply with "Type 1=" requirements of the Roanoke County Screening and Buffering Ordinance. 2. The subject area shall only be used for construction yard purposes substantially in accordance with the concept plan prepared by Spectrum Design, dated August 14, 2008. Dated this ~_~day of ~~ r/C-rr~/'~!~ , 2008 Respectfully submitted, =i~..a~„ ~ Wit- Sondra A. Stevens 1 w c m m n m m ~ ~~pia~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ fi u B tl ap 's { tll.~~': F~ t~ii~, VIl:~ : t 1 i ~ s ~~~~[°.~ g ~~$ ~ a f } ~ asap ~ o_m a 6 ® J Q W ~ ~ t ;~' ~~ I~~~ c'~ .~; ~~ { ~ ... ~ .~ a ~~~~~~~ ~ ~e$ _ ~ .._ ~i ~ ~~~~'~`wf ~~~~ 7C~ t {( I;~a~ ,'ii- a~. ~'- ~ ~ I F .. ~ t ,. i r ' { ° ' -+ ,. ~ ~ to /; C ~ !Y ~ ~ Oc ' ~ ~ ar ~~~ ,' ~~ ", r % a ' ' ~ , R~ it ~~ ~ ~~`~ = t . B -/I V~ . Q~ // ~. r~ t' 1 ,;' °r ~ ~ ~ ~ _. ~~ ~., - r /~ ,~ ~ r i 1 ~~ n ~' J ,1 .. ada~t.~re 3 e r ' STAFF REPORT Petitioner: American Electric Power Request: Rezone 13.103 acres from C-1C, Office District with Conditions, to I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District with Conditions, for the purpose of building a construction yard. Location: 1800 block of Loch Haven Drive Magisterial District: Catawba Existing (Specifically applicable to 13.103 acre portion of property) Conditions: In connection with its development of the subject property, Appalachian Power Company will landscape the property substantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan attached hereto, identified by drawing number SKA-4002 PL, dated March 3,1987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on the Planting Plan will be landscaped at the time of initial site grading so as to comply with "Type E" requirements of the Roanoke County Screening and Buffering Ordinance. If Appalachian Power Company has not, by February 1,1993, commenced construction of improvements on the portion of land rezoned B-1, Office District, in accordance with a site plan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County officials, and if no extension of such deadline is granted by Roanoke County on request of Appalachian Power Company, Appalachian Power Company will promptly offer the portion of land rezoned B-1 for sale at its appraised fair market value as zoned B-1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a petition by American Electric Power (AEP) requesting the rezoning of a portion of its 46.4 acre site in order to place the entire facility within one zoning district and expand its existing construction yard. The subject property is located in the Peters Creek community planning area. AEP has 228 employees based at this location which includes general offices, materials storage and service transportation divisions. No additional personnel would be added to the work force. Approximately three acres of new construction yard would be created within the 13.103 acres petitioned for rezoning. The site is designated Core by the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Core designation prescribes areas where high intensity urban development is encouraged. Core areas may be appropriate for large scale highway-oriented uses such as limited industrial uses. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The zoning ordinance defines construction yard as an establishment housing facilities or businesses primarily engaged in construction activities, including outside storage of materials and equipment. Typical uses are building contractors' yards. Use and Design standards for construction yards in an I-2, High Intensity Industrial district require a storage yard to be fully screened from surrounding views per Section 30-92 and shall be set back at least 100 feet from any adjoining residential district. Virginia Erosion & Sediment Control regulations provide for the protection of land and waterways downstream from development sites. Roanoke County drainage regulations require onsite detention of stormwater atpre-development rates. Complete site plan review and approval is required prior to construction yard expansion. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background -Appalachian Power Company originally received approval for the rezoning of 46+ acres at the subject location from Residential Estates (RE) District to Office (B-1) District and General Industrial (M-2) District in order to construct and operate an office, transmission and distribution service center in 1986. The following year, an internal division line between the B-1 and M-2 districts was redrawn to accommodate the petitioner's final construction plans for the service center. The placement of existing buildings, parking areas and roads on the property coupled with AEP's need for additional material and equipment storage necessitated expanding the existing outdoor storage area as proposed or adding storage to the rear of the overall site that would entail considerable grading of the slope along the northeast border of the site. Topography/Vegetation -The 13.103 acre proposed for rezoning slopes gently uphill from Loch Haven Drive. The area proposed for construction yard use -120,000 square feet (2.755 acres) tucked into the southeast corner of the overall site -currently rests four to five feet below the elevation of the southern extent of the existing storage yard. Field grass and scattered evergreen shrubs cover portions of the proposed 2.755 acre construction yard. The southeast corner of this area currently hosts a line of evergreen trees paralleling both Loch Haven Drive and Louise Wells Drive (private road to the east) that, when reinforced with additional plantings, will help meet screening and buffering requirements. Surrounding Neighborhood -The area subject to rezoning adjoins I-2 Conditional zoning (remainder of AEP facility) to the west and north. AR Agricultural/Residential zoning (existing single family homes) lies to the northeast along Louise Wells Drive. A C-2 conditionally zoned parcel (the former Jim Walter Homes sales operation) is found south across Loch Haven Drive. Interstate 81 is located to the southeast. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site LayoutlArchitecture -The applicant's concept plan prepared by Spectrum Design, dated August 14, 2008, indicates the proposed expansion of AEP's existing outdoor storage area in a southerly direction into the front yard of the site east of the existing pond. No buildings are proposed and no trucks would be stationed in the expanded construction yard. Within the expanded storage area would be transformers, cable spools/wire reels, insulators, crossbars and other heavy materials. The surface of the planned 120,000 square-foot area would be composed of hard-packed gravel and related materials similar to base material comprising the existing outdoor storage surface. Elevation of the proposed storage area is not expected to be raised per Spectrum Design. Extreme southern and eastern portions of the proposed new storage area require adjusting in a westerly direction in order to meet the 100-foot setback regulations and to safeguard and enhance existing evergreens, particularly along Loch Haven Drive (see Screening & Buffering). In addition to the minimum 100-foot setback required adjoining a residential district (east boundary adjacent to Louise Wells Drive), the county may also consider specific measures for dust control and maximum noise levels along adjoining property lines. AccesslTraffic Circulation -Permanent vehicular access to the new storage yard is designed via a 24-foot wide road emanating from the northeast corner of the existing storage yard. Tractor trailers and other heavy 2 trucks would utilize this road and forklifts would operate inside the proposed construction yard. Trucks en route to the expanded storage area would enter AEP property from the facility's private access onto VA 419 at the far northwest corner of the petitioner's site (existing I-2 Conditional and not a part of this petition). Tractor trailer traffic is not anticipated to increase from the current 32 trips per day per Spectrum Design. No "line trucks", or service trucks are stationed onsite. 2007 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on this portion of VA 419 was 11,000 vehicle trips; the AADT for Loch Haven Drive was 1,836 vehicle trips. 2007 AADT along this segment of Interstate 81 was estimated at 69,000 vehicle trips for combined parallel roadways. VDOT stated that the proposed use will not adversely impact the public right-of-way. Long- range plans to improve Exit 141 southwest of the site shown on VDOT's I-81 Corridor Improvement Study (Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement) could force the relocation of Loch Haven Drive, but are not expected to occur for more than 10 years, given existing budgetary conditions. AEP intends to utilize the southern portion of Louise Wells Drive as a construction entrance/exit until the proposed storage yard is complete and secured. That portion of the private road is on AEP property. Ownership of most of the private drive is shared with residential landowners east of the subject tract. Screening & Buffering -Existing onsite vegetation may provide part of the Type E, Option 1 or 2 (ordinance Section 30-92) necessary to effectively screen the construction yard. The lower interior elevation and berm effect in place along Loch Haven Drive frontage should assist in meeting landscape objectives to the south where the majority of new visual impact will occur. On the east boundary with single family homes, most existing vegetation is deciduous and will need additional evergreen infill. Exterior Lighting -The applicant plans to install 40-foot tall fiberglass light poles with four fixtures per pole (two metal halide lamps at 175 watts each and two lamps at 400 watts each). The 175 watt fixtures would be on a timer for night security. 400 watt fixtures would be on a separate switch. Ordinance Section 30-94 prohibits glare and light intensity exceeding 0.5 footcandle at adjoining streets and residential properties for all uses and developments requiring a site development plan. AEP will be able to install sufficient shields and/or filters to meet the ordinance regulation. Fire & Rescue/Utilities -The AEP site is served by Masons Cove Fire & Rescue Station 10, located five miles north on Bradshaw Road. Fire & Rescue staff have requested design consideration for emergency vehicle access. The Masons Cove station contains two ambulances, one pumper, one tanker, one brush truck, one squad vehicle and one utility/personnel transport vehicle as of May, 2008. Additional fire prevention inspections are anticipated at county business locations. Public water and sewer are in place at the AEP site. stormwater Management - A proposed stormwater detention pond is indicated on the concept plan located southwest of the expanded construction yard. This position for stormwater detention should not impact the existing duck pond in front of the main office building. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The American Electric Power site is designated Core by the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. High intensity urban development is encouraged in Core areas. Large-scale, highway oriented facilities are sometimes appropriate in Core locations. AEP has proven itself as a compatible large office and industrial facility relative to surrounding, mostly rural land uses north of Interstate 81. Land use determinants including zoning, access, population center and urban service availability are in place at the subject location. In regard to visual impacts and recreation, the proposal would not negatively impact the valley greenway system. Topographic differences to the west and north preserve the outdoor experience along the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail and the planned Mason Creek Greenway which are approximately one mile from AEP property. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This petition by American Electric Power to bring its entire site under one industrial use category . Only a very limited amount of the overall 46.4 acres would be utilized as a construction yard. As noted by Spectrum Design engineer Mike Rakes, "the project will be located on low ground near Interstate 81 and will not impact ridgelines. Extensive stormwater management practices are in place which will be appropriately expanded with new construction. There will be no increase in noise or odor. Proposed lighting will use similar fixtures currently in use and will be adjustable to prevent light levels from affecting adjacent properties. Roadway impacts are expected to be minimal as only necessary equipment will be stored and retrieved when required. No new entrances are proposed." If the Planning Commission favorably considers this request, staff recommends that American Electric Power proffer that the subject area shall only be used for construction yard purposes substantially in accordance with the concept plan prepared by Spectrum Design, dated August 14, 2008. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: PC: ATTACHMENTS: 23 -11 /2008 Timothy Beard 11 /3/2008 Rezoning Application 1987 Final Order Aerial Photograph Site Photographs Future Land Use Map Zoning Map C-1 District Regulations I-2 District Regulations BOS: 11/11/2008 4 {) ~1 t;-~ t\\ ~ County of Roanoke Communiity Development Planning & Zoning S2U4 Bernard Drive P Q Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 2018-{}798 (540) 772-2f168 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Dale recci~ved:O Received by: 1 ~~ ~1~ i A~plica~ion fee: ~ ~i PC/13ZA date: oo[[ ~~ ~ ~~Q~ Placards issued: 1305 date: Case Number /~! .~ " I I ~ (~L/~ ALL t1.PPl ICfI NTwS Check type ofapplication ftled (check all that apply) '~ Rezpning ^ Special Use ^ Variance ^ Waiver ^ Administrative Appeal ^ Cnmp Plan (1S~z-2232) Review Applicants nameladdress w/zip Pltone: .~`i ~ - 3 `t Z- --(~ oa 1 1+1 ~ ~: f~-~=• r~ E ! S P ~- ~-~- f~. v n ,~ it ~ ti t_ ,J ~ f Work: Sr~.ME Iv ~-rt~~n.c.l-t l',~~ ,S~ Ce!!#: 5`io°'7g8'~y-1rs p..oh,JCv-~ ,vA ~`tu11 -210'-{ Fax No: 5~0° 3~~-&o5S Owner's nameladdress wlzip Phone #: ~~I ~' " f, ~ ~ -~R~ ~- p,f~Ffztc.~~ L-1.~t . Pa~r'~C7. IE~sSi'r 5ii~~l-i~R.;~ Work: 5`~t7~~ 35~.. ~q-~2.. '~.,o.43oX 2o2i Fax No #: 5~Ict- q~~- ~.b'~11 ~~PwoK-~-,~R ~:'~n2"l..-'x..421 Property Location ~ ~ I ~ {_ o c.i-t ~t ~~ ~ ~ D ~ Magisterial District: ~ ,q'14 ~ w 3 f~ CammunityPlanninf;area: t~1t15oryc, ~~~~ ~2v~:,~1 Tax Map No D~~, , I D - G ti - ~`'{ . 4~ - U aUC~ Existing Zoning: C '.~.. G Size of parcel(s): Acres: 13 • I ~ ~ Existing Land Use: ~ iiL i'r~T RE24NINC;, SI'ECI~iL tlSE PERMIT; )f'.9IYER ~1ND C'Oh1I' I'Lf1 fV (15.?-2131} ItEVIE Ii' :-1 PPLICANT,S' (R15/W/CF) Proposed Zoning: ~ 2 G Proposed Land Use: ,,,~Ta RF, C.. t~ ' Jfi, t'r. t~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district'? Ycs ~/ No IF NO, A VARIANCI~ I5 REQUIRED FIRST. ~ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested €Jse Type. Yes Nn IF NO, A VARIANCE I5 REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No / I',~RIANCE, Tt!97VF.R.9ND,4D,ItINISTR~iTIV~a1PPEAL:9PPLIG'~1NT~S{1jfiY1.4~4) I Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of-the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order €o: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to is the application complete`? Please check ifenclosed APPLICATION WILL NOT SE ACCEPTED 1F ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MI55ING OR INCOMPLETE it/511Y/CP VIAA [215!lVICP VIAA Consuhation 8 112" x 11 "concept plan J Application Metes and bounds description ./ .lustification N ~ ~ Water and sewer applieatian I Iterehy certify that 1 anti either the owner of the proper y or the owner's a nt or antt C of the owner. __~~~L~~' t~t. 1U5/1Y/ P V/AA Application fee ~' ~ i~% ProfTers, if applicable Adjoining property owners aft purchaser and am acting wit]t the lcnowlcdge and consent / Owner's Signature .l>;JST1tt1C.~,.'€'ICl1V P'DR REZ4IVII~IG, SPpCfAL USR I''ERMIT 1VAil~F:12 4R GE)1V1P PLAN (1s 2.2232) R["sV1~1~1'. REQU ES')<'S Applicant ;~`r1 11L~ ~R K><5 j ..a (' it G ~ {~~ J ('~ U L 5 ~ (r+J 1"he Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver ar community plan (15.2-223.2) review requests to determine the Head and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare, Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary, Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Qrdinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning ofthe applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. ............ Please explain haw the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impacts} of the request an the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts an public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreatian and f re and rescue. Justification for Rezoning Applicant Mike Rakes/Spectrum Design The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan X15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use add'stional space if necessary. (County questions in fled; Our responses in Black) Please explain haw the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. This request will simplify a cumbersome zoning situation: the subject parcel is dual zoned. 13.103 acres are zoned C1C and 33.297 acres are zoned 12C, The boundary line between the two cannot be distinguished by a layman on the site. if rezoned to 12, the entire parcel will be of one zone and its use will comply entirely with County Ordinance 30-86-2 for Construction Yards. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The 2005 Community Plan locates this pareel in the Mason"s Cove planning area. This planning area puts great value on preserving existing ridgeline views and promotes storm water management. This project is located on low ground near I-81 and will have no impact an ridgelines. Also, extensive storm water management practices are in place which will be appropriately expanded with new construction. Please describe the impact(sj of the request an the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The impact of this rezoning will be to defragment the current zoning on this parcel. Adjoining properties will be unaffected as the current land use will not change. Impacts on water, sewer, schools, etc, will be zero as there will be no structures or employees added -only outdoor equipment storage. There will be no increase in noise or odor. Proposed lighting will use similar fixtures currently in use and will be adjustable to prevent light levels from affecting adjacent properties. Roadway impacts are expected to be minimal as only necessary equipment will be stored and retrieved when required. No new entrances are proposede Trucks exiting the property will use the existing Route 419 exit. J4JSTII%lt>A'I'[ON FOR VARIA1~lE'lu ItEQL3EST Applicant M1~~ RAI~~ 5 Ia~Lt ~ ~~iJJ'1 ~4:.~kGrJ The ofZoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-23Q9 oftl~e Code of V irginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be gran€ed Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own wards, describe haw the request meets each factor. if additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper 1 The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 1 ~1 1 ~ ~ ~-1 ~ ~ 1 S N ~ ~ , 2 The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict t1~e use of the property. 3 The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity Such l3ardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance 4 The variance will not be ofa substantial detriment to the adjacent properties ar the character ofihe district 4 ~IUSTi1~1CA`I"t©lr',~OR AD]?711~15'1'1tA'1'1'~'~; APPL.aTJR~t2U1;S'T' Applicant ~ ~ Y-F [ZA kt.rG 5 ~ S P~ ~ ~ R J f}~ i~ ~ .~ ~ Cr rJ P{ease respond to the following as thoroughly as passible !f additional space is needed, use additional sheets oE'paper. 1. Reasons For appeal: ~~ T1-lti~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~• 2 Evidence supporting claim: 5 colveEl"~e YI_AN C~ancxLrsT A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to 6e considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use ar design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit €he future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable 6y County petrnitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan ar plat plan that is required prior to tl~e issuance afa building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to tl~e initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concep€ plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan {15.2-22.32) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level ofdetail may vary, depending an the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt same ofthe items or suggest the addition ofextra items, but the follawin are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS ~ a. Applicant name and name of development / b Date, scale and north arrow / c. L•at size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties ~ e Physical features such as g€ound cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. / f'. The zoning and land use of alI adjacent properties ~ g. All property lines and easements ~' All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights / i Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets ar other public ways within ar adjacent to the development `l j 17imensians and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces ~idditional it forrrratiorr r egreired for REZONING acrd SPECIAL. USE' PE12MI7"~fPPL.IC~fNTS lc Existing utilities {ovate€, sewer, storm drains} and connections at the site / I. Any driveways, entranceslexits, curb openings and crossovers / m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals `~ n Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections a L acations of all adjacent fire hydrants f p Any proffered conditions at the site and haw they are addressed ,f q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule l certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete ~3av _ Signature of applicant Date G ~ Ary ~ ~ •. Community Development Planning & Zoning Division rs~ NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAVER, OR SPEC'IAJ`, USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing Tf it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available far planning staff andlor an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional infvrmaiion and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission, The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted.. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, ar Special Use Permit petitian if the County Transportation Engineering Manager ar staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses andlor a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential Iand uses and sltrratlorls that r~~ortld 1I~C4'SSItfItE',!'II"ther'.Stlldy is pl•ovided as pal•t of tlrrs applicatiall package), This continuance shall allow sufficient time far all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses andlor traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. Tf a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date., Effective Date: April 19, 2005 f Name of Petition s~-- Petitioner"s guature n ~~~~ Date Community Develaprnent Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL, OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ANDIOR TRAFFIC ~MFACT STUDY The fallowing is a list of potentially high trafl:~c~generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a mare detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, ar special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we reCamrnend that you meet with a County planner, the County Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation stafF to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and i/DOT reserve the right to request a trahrc study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or Apartments with mare than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • GaS StatlDn/C.anvenienCE Stare/Car Wash • Retail shap/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Galf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • bay care center • Bank • Nan-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 5©€I-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 46Q, 11/4fii), 22fI, Z21, 419, etc) • Far new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress an roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc (i.e. an Lang Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc) • Deveiapment in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • bevelapment would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic slgna[(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (1QQ) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator ar the peak hour an the adjacent streets, or aver seven hundred fifty (75D) trips In an average day J y ~ Dy ~ .. D v ~< W ®® W 6 aF ~ ~ ~ „u ZC7 d 7 ~~~~ ~_ ~ ~ w H z C7r~ I iF ~ ,.< o _ ~ E_ ~ °~ z ~- z ~' o ~ ~ ~ _ ~p ~ ~;z ~ .~~ ~ ~ it _ a a~.W a ~p O~ ~a. v~W ~ o~ oe U~ 00 ~~vt. <.~ ° ~ ~ p m~"g ~$& ~' 0 ~~~ ~~ ~ n~~a ~~~N 1 jm- s ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~~ ~~~~n~ ~~~ eo ~ ~ ~ Z w Z ~ o~ N \ ~o °~ a ~~ ~~ ~_~~~ a __ wig-w _~ o= ~o~ o am os -_ - - g - 8 h~ ~ k~~~ w~~~ / ~g ~~~ / / \ ~ LEGEND - SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE - DEED LINE ® SET REBAR O EXIST[NG IRON FOUND O END OF LINE/CURVE NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING SET T ti O t~, ~ ~ ~ ~vo r>~s: DOUGLAS R. o u MEREDITH, JR. a 3. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT S~ THE BENEFIT OF A T[TLE SEARCH AND THEREFORE MAY NOT SHOW ALL LiC. No. 7450-8 ENCUMBRANCES. C ~ ~"'= 2. TWIS PROPERTY AS PLATTED DOES NOT 9`t'D SURVti~o ~ 8 FALL WITHIN 7HE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE. 3. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL AND CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. DATE: 4. ANY PHYSICAL [MPROVEMENTS N0T I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT OF SURVEY TO BE CORRECT DIMENSIONED, SHALL NOT 8E SCALED. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF 5. FEMA FLOOD ZONE: 'X' 51161C0133G SOgyg`•0 „ , p E ~~~''28~50 ~ 6. LEGAL REFERENCE: OB 1234 PG 254 ~., -.':\~:~-,~.~ ~, :`,'.~.. - HATCHED AREA = 13.103 AC. TO BE REZONED FROM C7C TO 12C GRAPHIC SCALE 300 4 150 340 I inch = 300 R. 102 Albemarle Ave jg j~ ] Roanoke, Virg0113 1~'1 y `' ~ , FC:' 24 _; __ ~. _ .:: ~:._-- -_: www.lmwpc.com En sneering ph: 540.345.0675 Architecture fax: 540.342.4456 Surveying ', Landscape Design Imweng@Imw.roacoxmaiLcom CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CH. BEARING CHORD ANGEN ©EITA CI ~5-03 718.87 57B'25'33'V X5.07 22.55 3'35'35' C2 1~7.~8 718.87 S86'05'~8'V 17.15 73.96 11v~'S~' C3 207.78 798.55 N78.13'20•V 207.19 10~.~8 i~'S~'28' 'w PLAT OF SUR VEY SHDYVING 13.103 ACRES TO BE REZONED FOR APPALACHIANPOWER COMPANY LpCATED IN CATAWB MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE; VA COMM. 3574 SURVEYED: 8/28/D8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR AREA TO BE REZONED AT AEP SITE That certain lot ar parcel of land, together with any impravernents thereon, situate, lying and being in Raanolce County, Virginia, containing 13.103 acres of land to be rezoned fi-nm C1 C to I2C, and being more pai•ticr~larly described according to plat as follows. Beginning at an iron rod at the Southeast corner of said property adjoining the property can-ently owned by Rigoberto Arellana and being nn the Northerly line of Koch l-Iaven Road. Thence with said road right-of~way S57°55'32"W, 89.97 feet; thence S38°58'.32"W, .360.69 fact; thence S48°40'50"W, 156.52 feet; thence S63°55' 18"W, 223.70 feet; thence S13°01'24"E, 20.60 feet; thence S76°0.3'00"W, 176.53 feet; thence S76°37'48"W, 244,.38 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a length a1~45.08 Pent, a chard bearing of S78°25'33"W, a chord distance of4S.07 feet, and a radius of 718.87 feet; thence leaving Lacy Haven Raad, N07°55'00"E, 245..31 feet; tl~encn N52°05'00"W, 172.00 feet; tllnnee N 18°45'00"W, 145.00; thence N71 ° 15'00"E, 753.00 Pent; thence N44°32'23"L, 207.89 feet; thence N79°13'04"E, 335.00 feet; thence S06°15'00"L, 282.50 feet to the point of beginning. t g~ ~y 4 k~ ~~ A~ ~x ~ F ~ ,., ~- ~ 4 n ~ \ i ~ 1 ~ p rr Xf F ~Y1~ K§ 4 ~~ ~ ~~ ~y l` ~, Y ~~ ~ ~j , 5~» ~p~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ z as ~p ~ 8 9 C -Y R a ~_ ~~ V 3~ ~ ~~ v~ u n ~ ' i Y~ ~ q is ~~ A _ ~ ~~ J ~~ ~ ° ~,4 h`. 1 E~ L {{ iy ` ?~ ~~I .~ '' °i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 3 4 :J ~' ~`- ~~~ae t ~ ~ ~ O~ I ® ~ w ~ ~ ~ = ¢ W ~ o ~ ; ~ ¢° rn W `s E 6 ~ E S :l M I.-~ ~~ y ~gg~~Syy 4 4 I ~-" iC Q i V E J ~ q ~~ ~ ~ ~~ G ~~ !~ ap n6S Sp ~~ vp ~ ~~ ~3Y h ~q a 3 6 ~~s •~~ ~~~~ ~ ~,~ ~,: U ~d~ °:..a3s ~. i C i r . ~] :~ ~~ I.,AW OFFICES WOOFS, POGfR5 6 NA77,EGRGVE NOANtlNE VA ~8~~ 1~ VTRGINTA: BErORE TF1E BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOICE COUNTY A 47± acra parcel of land } 'generally locat~:d on the north ) side of Loch Haven Road at its } ORDER intersection of Route A19 and ) ITnterstate 81 within the ) (Catawba riagisterial District. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTX: 67HEREA5, by ~`inal Order dated January 29, 198b, the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County did rezone the abnve- referenced parcel of land from RE (Residential. Estates} Dis- trict to B-l (Office} and M-2 (General Industrial) Iistrict for the purpose of permitting construction of a general. office transmission and distribution service center far Appalachian Power Campanv; and tdHEREAS, on March 9, (987, your petitioner, Appalachian Power Company, did petition the Hoard of County Supervisors to rezone portions of said parcel so as to change the division line between the B-1 and M-2 zoning districts to accommodate Appalachian's final construction plans for the service center; and WHEREAS, after due legal. notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing an the petition an April 6, 1987, at which time all partzPS in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due 1ega1 notice, the Hoard of County Supervisors did hold a public hearing on the petition an April 28, 1987, at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity tv be heard; and .,~n • ~ ~ ~~ f~.y.;~ ,r ~ ~' ~ ,~~~';- d~tx n~ ~, __~ , t=~~ ` ~ z_~ I§~~~11C ~~I~.~~fJ~ ~..,',,•r~ :, SdHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved subject to certain conditions proffered by the petitioner (said conditions having been amended from those originally proffered in con- nection with the January 29, 1986, rezoning). NdW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that portions of the afore- mentioned parcel of land, which is contained in Raanake County ta:~ maps as parcel 36.10--1-14 be rezoned from B~1 (Office) to Td-2 (General Industrial) District and that other portions be rezoned from M-2 (General Industrial) to B-1 (pffice) gistrict with the result that the portion of the land zoned B-1 shall be as described in Schedule A attached hereto and the portion of the land zoned M-2 sftall be as described on Schedule B attached hereto, all subject to the fallowing conditions: (A1 TYze portion of the land rezoned M-~2 (General Indus-~ trial District) will not be used for any of the following: {1) Manufacture, compounding, processing, packaging ar treatment of such products as bakery goods, candy, cosme- tics, dairy products, drugs, perfumes, pharmaceuticals, per- fumed toilet soap, toiletries and food products; t2) Manufacture of pottery and figurines ar other similar ceramic products, using only previously pulverized clay, and kilns fired only by elevtricity yr gas; (3) Manufacture of musical instruments, toys, novelta_es and rubber and metal stamps; (9) Seed and feed stares; {5) Cabinet, furniture and upholstery shops; (fi) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; (7) Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; U4W OFFICES WOpAS, RGGERS i HAZI,EGRGYE RGAHGKE. VA. (8) Flea markets; (9) Brick manufacturing plants and sawmills; {10) Cotton spinning mills; 2 (Il} goat building; {12) Stone works. (S) In connection with its development of the subject yaw oFFlCEs WRORS, ii96ER5 i, NASLE6NOVE nonHOx~.va property, Appalachian Power Company will, landscape the property substantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan attached hereto, identified by drawing number 53~A--4©02C PL and dated March 3, 1.987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on the Planting Plan will be landscaped at the time of initial site grading sn as to comply with the "Type E" requirements pf the Roanoke County Screening and Suffering prdinance (section 21--92.g., Roanoke County Code}. (C} {1) Zf Appalachian Power Company has not, by Feb- ruary 1, 1991, commenced construction of improvements an the portion of the Land rezoned M-2 (General Industrial District) in accordance with a site plan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County officials, and if no extension of such deadline is granted by Roanoke County an request of Appalachian Power Company. Appalachian Power Company will promptly offer the entire 97± acre parcel for sale at its appraised fair market value as zoned 5--1 and M-2. (2} If Appalachian Power Company has not, by Feb- ruary 1, 1993, commenced construction of improvements an the portion of the land rezoned F1-l (Office District} in accordance with a site plan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County officials, and if nn extension of such deadline is granted by Roanoke County on request of Appalachian Power Company, Apga- lachian Power Cnmpany will promptly offer the portion of the land rezoned S-1 for sale at its appraised fair market value as zoned S-1. Legal Description of Property: (a) The portion of the land rezoned B--1. {pffice District) is described in Schedule A attached. (b) The portion of tEte land rezoned M--2 {General Tndus- trial F3istrict) i.s described in Schedule F3 attached. 3 SE IT FC7R'1'HER QRDERED that a copy of this order be trans- mitted to the Secretary cf the Planning Commission and that he he directed to reflect that change an the Official Zoning Map o£ Roanoke County. ADAPTED on motion of Supervisor Jghnsan and upgn the fallowing recorded vote: AXES: Brittle, Gairett, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw 5'~?G~i-_.t.~., ~, Q L_-~.~.~,t..r. Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of 5upervisars CC: Department of Development Planning Department Real Estate Assessor inw vesicEs wvvos,ROaEAs 6 HAZLEQRDVE A6ANOKE. VA. Q iA ~i ~It "~ Rio - - 4 ' ~ ~ .~~' .' c R. ~ci: S I ~. ~, k R ~tv y~~ t •.. ''~t+~ ~ ~ a '(iF,' ~ i t ~ ~ ~ ~rr<c: rvia o ~ ° m s s ~'~ dry"' , ~- "'*~ ~ ~ z ! '~ , B f Y _ $'ji ~} - .trY, ~• ~ R oY _ ~-fir- ter i si 5 C., ; ~ ?,r ~~ ~C ~* ~~ r~ry-'"r,y , ~ %r ~ ~ i4 ~ ~: - ~ .~ ~r ~ 333333 ~ o kk : ~ i fir' n ar. ~* ~~`ir.' s'.. t'~}' ' ~.~"! _ _,y~ ~~Z+r '~_ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ N W ~.~• ~ 3~ `'f~ ~~_~~ - ~, 1'. ~ ~ .a~~ ~ _ d~ ;, yam. '~r B* O r a., s "-k"rj'• 7^ -w •~ f '.6L4~i'R R ~ ' -~. ~{ ek. ~ ~~ V / d•~ ~~: 'i ~44.,. a .. "1' !'r" ~a'~ sira Fw ~°-~f' i '~. ~."n~ ~ ~:~ .~. '? -i, ~ J1`' R~ {~ r •e r '7~ r '~` , ~~ ~tix~~~ a le ~ ` ~, ~t •'~~ ~-r , `*:„J ~ ~ ~~' , ~ ~ fi'r' ~~pT ~Jr• •'~~'9c ~.'~w ~4~~ Ir ~ }, 4,~ r~'S+-~r~ :3:~+ a silt. Vii' r a ~~~ #4.j ~ ~ 1 ~'~ . ~ o-- ~/ / ~~ F4i - Jtr ~:L~ ~: ~~ ' ~:: + r I A. ' h - ~ ~ i',% 4.- • 1 r ~ - 3 y S c. :} S J''.yy '~ ° • vt ') ii~L .~: iii 4a~ .:°.~ I '~k... r''~i '_ ~ ~ - d'SY ]4,/ ~ ~d~ a - ,~~, -' • *sy °b~ ~ a ,~ k„ .ri i .~ ~'~ +.'~• mod'. .J~~ ~ ~, "^i: ~-. '{' ~ _. Ifs ~ • ! ~ . ~ r +Mr. + .: ~.~' ~'~ ..4 ~' S +~ ~ ~l ~ *~ ~ '~h~ .i .fit=i., i 7ks r, ~•~: 'if AS..'~r-e'"~ °~Y'r'.,~,~` r''F * •t ~'- _~. 'r'~ ~1~' •~~ J'',x, r "-' `~"~ ~ x*.v- ~a'_ t „~~{ ~( .lr'ti y i eyE ..J'. ~ y ~ a, =w: ~ d ;h`';`t S~Y~ ' -~~ i _ f .~~'Y. ~ ~ ~_` 1. M~` ~ T}~'. C~,.S+' w i~.sa". r+ _,,~.':.4 ~ f 4`x'3 ~ ;~''-y ~'~, ~h* r rwy ~' ~' - *~ .. _ i'"7 :i,•--¢'~i,~' - ~~ a` ~ _'iA"f' ')i•'" t ~}'} ~ ` '~.,v ~ y ~~ R.y~ •~ f ~ r~~Y• ~ ryt • ~ .RF ,~ ~c ` ~ •~ ~~ ~~ '~-•~ yr• ° ~ ~cb'~ n w a at" .w' {~r~r~ W ~.' `~ g ~ ,. ~ ~~r ~ J~t~ r, ~ }'k `„",~'~, t'~- 'ly I - Y t wx 'v0` .w 0 ~'i , c? +` yl, .}' # 9. ~ ,~.. .# '-.,,tom ~ ~",~, ~ -""~ IF ~ ~,;, y ~ } ~- ,~ . "~; Jai ,'Y ~.' ,fir " ~ .. s ` ~, k~ :.~ N x i M: ~ ~q /W~ ~~~ ~ €~ Ecs H~ , v~ ~ ~. :{.~ ifs 'i ° ~ I #^ i_'tt ;~''~ .klyl~'1"` :C'~5x.- .+f7 0 ~. ~ ~ '-~ iR . ~~, q -~~ rr t . ''~ ,spa a--i ../.. ~$ 1 •t w s a-~ ,a.. .~i-k~-'d },~_ - e, = ~ , L Ai- _,y ~:a,.g.~. ~i ~ } r;' t ~~4#r.~_r~r t A . ~- g~ ~ qt .l'a. ~ej%f ~ ..c ~~ ~ .c ~ ~' ~'`~~' -..~" ~ n - Asa ~ T~:' F ~ ~ ~ _ • `:s'~ ~,ei ;,,ir~~ ~3 € ~' ~ ~p~ a~ ,.+,p u Y]t Y 4 .. ~ ~ J.. ~• .~ r~ z r `j r ~ " ~ ^i w C i' ~a'F r ' . 5 ~ ~, ,F +r f ~~~ ~ ~Y: ~. s . w `" ,.. ~~ s - , i ~ , - _.. . ~, . s 2 !~r ~ r ~`r~ ~n ' ~ ~ =~ @ 6 i c.t i c ~ s~3'~ ~c ~ ~ ~ " t _ ,~ xw f~ ~` ~~ .t x + j~~ L '~ r~ ~ l v +< < "~ - _:.,. .:~g~ti~t '!~: ~' ~. .~ - t C1 ~ K .. .i - ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~ . ? { a ,f~` 1U k iT'r.• ~t ~ ° ~*~ i ,. _ "'~ ~.'' ri Z _ ` nay} ~~_ n~ ~`t .. :.e~~~xi "~'- ,. ~' ~. ~ +,~, ^, ~ ~ '~~x, ~ t 1 ~ ~~A ~+~'- -r *- r °_.'' ` :.~ s ~ ~~ n~a `w~ ~~ _ t _1, ~l, .~ 00 O O :~ _ ,~~ ~~ ~ ~L -. T'y ~~; ~ x~~_y~~ i ~" _~ ~' ~ti ~. ~SC . ~ ~:~:!5S 'v y. ~~•4". =.1..r ' ~ ~~. ~_' ~~ <_;'~' Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: American Electric Power Existing Zoning: C1C Proposed Zoning: 12C Tax Map Number: 036.10-01-14.03-0000 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 13.103 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 400' Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: American Electric Power Existing Zoning: C1C Proposed Zoning: 12C Tax Map Number: 036.10-01-14.03-0000 Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 13.103 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 400' ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 1 of .3 SEC. 30-53. C-1 ©FFICE DISTRICT. Sec. 3Q-S3~1. Purpose. {A) The purpose of the C-1 office district is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county-wide needs The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses.. Retail uses are permitted, to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment.. The C-'1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred andlor where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting Land use types_ Land uses permitted in the C-1 office district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core sand use categories of the comprehensive plane Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. (Ord. No, 042208-16, ~ t, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. {A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home BeautylBarber Salon Home Occupation, Type I * Multi-family Dwelling Twa-family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center Educational Facilities, CollegelUniversity Educational Facilities, PrimarylSecondary Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Past Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services http:l/library4.naunicode.eorra/defaultlDcacView/12222/1112011 23 10/27/2008 ARTICLE 11I. DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1'a~e 2 of 3 Utility Services, Minor 3, Office Uses Finanalal lnstltUtianS * General Office Medical Office 4. Cammercial Uses Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Communications Services Personal Services Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary HaspitaflClinic 5 Miscellaneous Uses Amate~ar Radio Tower Parking Facility (B) The fapawing uses are allowed only by special use permit p~€rsuant to section 30-39.. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.. 1 Civic Uses Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 2 Office Uses Laboratories 3 Commercial Uses Cammercial lndaar Sports and Recreation 4 Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble 5 MisceNaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower * Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No.. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No [142799-1'1, ~ 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No 042293-13, § 1, 4-22-03; Ord. No.. 0422[}8-16, § 1, 4-22-48) Sec. 3Q-53-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, sea Article lV, Use and []esign Standards. http://library4~municode,corraldefault/DacView112222/1/1201123 10/27/2008 ARTICLE 111. DISTRICT REGULATIONS (A)Minimum iaf requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (~43,56Q square feet}. b. F'rnntage: 1A0 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or bath: a.. Area: 15,Q00 square feet. b Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B}Minimum sef6ack requiremenfs 1. Front yard: Page 3 of 3 a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 2p feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 1C1 feet nn any one side, with a combined total an both sides of at least 25 feet b. Accessory structures: 1Q feet behind the front building line, or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard. a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet„ 4. Where a lot fronts nn more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.. (C)Maximum height of structures, 1 Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-i or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet far each foot in height over 45 feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance.. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, (D)Maximum coverage. 1 Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.. 2. Lot coverage. 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. Nn. 62293-12, § 1 p, 6-22-93) 1~ttp://library4,municode.cotnlde~au[t/DocView/12222/ 1 /120/ 12.3 10/27/2008 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 1 of 3 SEC. 3a-62. I-2 HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, Sec.3L1-62-9. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the l-2, high intensity industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service area which contain existing mare intensive industrial uses or are suitable far such activities. These areas coincide with the principal industrial land use category contained in the comprehensive plan and are designated based an the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from (loading and the relative remoteness and absence of substantial residential development which Gould be adversely affected by such development. In addition, the availability of adequate sewer and water capacity, access to arterial road network, and proximity to rail and airport facilities ar the interstate highway sys#em are major considerations.. Distributing these areas around the county in a planned manner to create employment centers within Glase proximity to residential growth areas and reduce heavy traffic generation of Indus#rial uses is encouraged.. {Ord Na (742799-1 1, § 1 f , 4-27-99; Ord, Na. (142208-16, § 1, 422-0$) Sec. 3U-62-2. Permitted Uses. (A} The fallowing uses are permitted by right sE~bject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance, An asterisk (*} indicates additional, modified ar mare stringent standards as listed in article IV, arse and design standards, far those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture 2. Civic USe3 Day Care Center * Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Maintenance and Service Facilities Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services Utility Services, Minor Utility Services, Major 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Automobile Repair Services, Major ~' Business Support Services http:l/lihrary~.rnunicode.con~/default/DocView/12222/1 /120/12.3 10/27/2008 ARTIf~LL III.. UISTRIC'T RIIC~ULATIONS Page 2 of 3 Business nr Trade Schools Equipment Sales and Rental Laundry 5. lndusfrla! Uses Construction Yards Custom Manufacturing * Industry, Type I and Type II Landfill, Rubble * Meat Packing and Related Industries Railroad Facilities Recycling Centers and 5tatians ~' Scrap and Salvage Services " Transfer 5#atinn Transpartatinn Terminal Truck Terminal Warehousing and ©istributinn 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Rodin Tnwer " Parking Facilities {B} The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk {*) indicates additional, modified nr more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses, ~ l/iviC U5E5 Correctional Facilities 2. Cammercia! Uses Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Mini-warehouse Surplus Sales Truck Stnp 3 Industrial Uses Asphalt Plant * Composting "' Industry, Type III * Resource 1=xtractian 4 Miscellaneous Uses Aviation Facilities, Private * http://library4,municncle.comlclefault/DocView/I222Z/1/120112.3 10/27/2008 ARTICL1;111, D1STR.ICT REGULATIC7NS Page 3 of 3 Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings (Ord. No 82493-8, § 2, 8-2493; Ord. No. 042297-14, ~ 1, 4-22-97; Ord. No (?42799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. (782807-18, § '1, $-28-07; Ord.. No 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-Q8) Sec. 30-fit-3. Site Development Regtalations. General Standards l=nr additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards, {A) Minimum fot requiremenfs 1. Lets served by private well and sewage disposal system; a.. Area: 1 acre {43,580 square feet). b.. l=rootage: 100 feet on a publicly awned and maintained street. 2.. Lots served by either public sewer or water, ar both: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b.. Frontage: 100 feet nn a publicly awned and maintained street. {B) Minimum sefback requirements. 1. E=rant yard: 30 feet, ar 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principe! structures: 10 feet: b. Accessory structures: behind front building line and 3 feet from side line, 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet.. b. Accessory structures. 3 feet. 4. Where a let fronts an more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of sfructures. 1. Height limitations: a All structures: When adjoining property zoned Residential, seventy-five {75) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required side andlor rear yard adjoining a residential district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height aver seventy-five (75) feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds seventy-five (75) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited.. (D) Maximum coverage 1. Building coverage: 75 percent of the fatal lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 9Q percent of the total lot area. {Ord. No. 42~i94-12, § 9, 4-20-94; Ord.. No. 042208-16, ~ 1, 4-22-08) http://library4.municode,corn/clefault/DocView/12222111120/123 10/27/2008 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE REZONING 13.103 ACRES FROM C-1 C, OFFICE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO I-2C, HIGH INTENSITY INDUS"TRIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE PUROSE OF CONSTRUCTING A CONSTRUCTION YARD LOCATED AT "THE 1800 BLOCK OF LOCH HAVEN DRIVE, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (PART OF TAX MAP N0.36.10-1-14.3), UPON THE APPLICATION OF AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 11, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 3, 2008; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 13.103 acres, as described herein, and located in the 1800 block of Loch Haven Drive (Part of Tax Map Number 36.10-1-14.3) in the Catawba. Magisterial District, is hereby changed From the zoning classification of C-1 C, Office District with conditions, to the zoning classification of I-2C, High Intensity Industrial District. 2. "that this action is taken upon the application of American Electrical Power. 3. That the owner of'the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1 (1) In connection with its development of the subject property, Appalachian Power Company will landscape the property substantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan attached hereto, identified by drawing number SKA-4002 PL, dated March 3, 1987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on the Planting Plan will be landscaped at the time of initial site grading so as to comply with "Type E" requirements of the Roanoke County Screening and Buffering Ordinance. (2) The subject area shall only be used for construction yard purposes substantially in accordance with 'the concept plan prepared by Spectrum Design, dated August 14, 2008. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod at the southeast corner of said property adjoining the property currently owned by Rigoberto Arellano and being on the northerly line of Loch Haven Road; thence with said road right of way S 57° 55' 32" W 89.97 feet; thence S 38° 58' 32" W 360.69 feet; thence S 48° 40' S0" W 156.52 feet; thence S 63° 55' 18" W 223.70 feet; thence S 13° 01' 24" E 20.60 feet; thence S 76° 03' 00" W 176.53 feet; thence S 76° 37' 48" W 244.38 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a length of 45.08 feet, a chord bearing of S 78° 25' 33" W, a chord distance of 45.07 feet, and a radius of 718.87 feet; thence leaving Loch Haven Road, N 07° 55' 00" E 245.31 feet; thence N 52° 05' 00" W 172.00 feet; thence N 18° 45' 00" W 145.00 feet; thence N. 71 ° 15' 00" E 753.00 feet; thence N. 44° 32' 23" E 207.89 feet; thence N. 79° 13' 04" E 335.00 feet; thence S 06° 15' 00" E 282.50 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 13.103 acres, being part of Tax Map No. 36.10-1-14.3 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 PETITIONER: Faith Fellowship Church CASE NUMBER: 24-11/2008 Board of Supervisors Consent 1St Reading Date: October 28, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 3, 2008 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2"d Reading Date: November 11, 2008 A. REQUEST To obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, General Commercial District, for the purpose of Religious Assembly on 1.0 acre located at 4108 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The commission had a brief discussion on the petitioner's plans to lease the property for a religious assembly use. Mr. McNeil inquired whether the property would be classified as tax-exempt while being leased by the petitioners. Mr. Obenshain responded that religious assembly land uses are tax-exempt. D. CONDITIONS 1. The maximum seating in the principal place of worship shall not exceed accommodations for 230 people. 2. The access drive shall not be utilized for parking and shall remain unobstructed for fire and rescue apparatus. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. McNeil made a motion to recommend approval of the special use permit with two conditions. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Faith Fellowship Church Request: Special Use Permit for Religious Assembly Location: 4108 Electric Road Magisterial District: Cave Spring Suggested 1. The maximum seating in the principal place of worship shall not exceed Conditions: accommodations for 230 people. 2. The access drive shall not be utilized for parking and shall remain unobstructed for fire and rescue apparatus. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Faith Fellowship Church is requesting a Special Use Permit for the establishment of a Religious Assembly in an existing 10,754 square foot building located at 4108 Electric Road. Reverend Hoffman plans to lease the 1 acre parcel from the owner to start a new church in the area. The petitioner is proposing to utilize the entire building. Interior renovations are proposed for a sanctuary, Sunday school classrooms, and office space. The application proposes accommodations for 230 seats in the sanctuary. The petitioner plans to hold services on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. No exterior alterations are planned. The petitioner has demonstrated that sufficient parking is available for the proposed use. The property is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District and the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. One of the land use goals of the Cave Spring Planning Area is to maintain and enhance the commercial core in and around the Tanglewood Mall area. The subject property is zoned C-2, General Commercial District. The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. According to the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Designation of the property is Core. These areas encourage high intensity urban development. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. While impacts on adjacent uses are expected to be very minimal, the loss of commercial business space is a concern. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Religious Assembly is allowed by Special Use Permit in the C-2 zoning districgt Building plan review is required for proposed interior alterations. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background -Based upon the Roanoke County Real Estate records, the property was acquired by the current owner in 1988. The applicant plans to lease the property. The one-story commercial structure was built in 1979. The petitioner intends to utilize the entire building for the proposed use. The property is currently vacant, but has been utilized for various commercial uses in the past such as retail (Sofa World) and personal improvement services (Gold's Gym). Topography/Vegetation -The property slopes gradually in a northeasterly direction up and away from Electric Road. The existing vegetation on the parcel consists of a sparse line of deciduous trees located along the eastern property line and interior landscaping around the building and throughout islands in the parking lot. There is no landscaping proposed with the special use permit application. Surrounding Neighborhood -The subject property and all properties within the surrounding area are zoned C-2. There is a mixture of uses adjacent to the subject property including retail establishments, restaurants, and medical offices. All surrounding property support commercial land uses. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site LayoutlArchitecture - According to Roanoke County Real Estate Records, the base area of the existing commercial structure is 10,754 square feet. The existing structure is a one-story masonry structure on a slab. The building has a stucco finish on the exterior of the building. It is setback approximately 200 feet from Electric Road. The parcel is a pipe-stem lot with cross-access to the adjacent shopping center to the west. The property is served by public water and sewer. The petitioner has indicated that the proposed sanctuary/worship area will accommodate 230 seats. Interior renovations are proposed for a sanctuary, Sunday school classrooms and office space. The petitioner intends to utilize the entire building. No exterior renovations are planned. The site is fully developed with adequate parking for the proposed use and direct access to Electric Road. The petitioner has demonstrated that the site will accommodate 59 parking spaces, including 3 handicapped. The site has existing handicapped ramps and sidewalks along the building. No parking is proposed along the existing access drive which will be designated as a fire lane. AccesslTraffic Circulation -Access to the subject property would continue via the existing 27 foot wide commercial entrance on Electric Road. The existing entrance is a right-in/right-out only. Upon a preliminary study of the site, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has indicated that the site appears to meet sight distance requirements. The property can also be accessed via across-access entrance along the western property line that is shared with the Madison Square Shopping Center. According to the petitioner, traffic generated by the church would be greatest on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. Fire & Rescue/Utilities -Fire and Rescue services would continue as currently provided. Cave Spring Fire and Rescue is the emergency facility closest to the subject property. Per Todd Maxey, Division Chief for the Roanoke County Department of Fire and Rescue, commented that building access be considered for fire and rescue apparatus. Gary Huffman, Fire Marshal for Roanoke County, conducted a site visit to the subject property concluding that the fire lanes are still visibly marked in the field, but the signs have been removed. Both sides of the main entrance to the property are designated as fire lanes to prevent parking on the sides of the road. Fire lanes are required to be 20 feet in width. Mr. Huffman also concluded that the curbing along the cross- accessentrance will need to be painted yellow. Ray Craighead, Craighead & Associates, has submitted a concept plan showing the location of the nearest fire hydrant and existing fire lanes. Mr. Craighead has designed the parking and drive aisles to ensure that fire apparatus can reach the most remote portion of the building. The existing fire lanes will be unobstructed and identified with signs and pavement markings. Screening and Buffering -The zoning ordinance does not require additional screening or buffering as the adjacent properties are zoned C-2, General Commercial. There is an existing fence located along the rear property line and a spare line of deciduous trees along the eastern property line. 2 Economic Development -The Roanoke County Department of Economic Development strongly objects to the proposed use citing a loss of commercial space along a developed commercial corridor. The Department of Economic Developments states that commercial space in the Tanglewood Mall area is limited and should be occupied by commercial uses that provide jobs and revenue. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of the subject property is Core. The core areas encourage high intensity urban development. Core areas are central business districts that are appropriate for highway-oriented retail uses and regionally-based shopping facilities. Land uses that are encouraged include: retail shops, personal services, office and institutional uses, and limited industrial uses. Due to limited availability, areas designated as Core are not appropriate for tax-exempt facilities. STAFF CONCLUSIONS There are no anticipated impacts of the proposed church on adjacent uses. The site is fully developed with adequate parking and access from Electric Road. The applicant has worked with Roanoke County Planning, Building, and Fire and Rescue staff to ensure that the concept plan for the proposed use is in general conformance with applicable regulations. The traffic impacts generated by the proposed use should be minimal as church activities are planned for Sundays and Wednesday evenings which will not conflict with the business hours of most adjacent uses. The loss of commercial business space is a concern as the proposed use is not in conformance with the Core future land use designation. CASE NUMBER: 24-1112008 PREPARED BY: Lindsay Blankenship HEARING DATES: PC: 1113108 BOS: 12/18/08 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Aerial Photograph Site Inspection Photographs Zoning Map Future Land Use Map C-2 zoning district regulations (u;t~tur3iy oI'I~~ttariul~ta C.nrtimunit~= Dcvelolarncnf PI;~nnin~ ~ l,or~inh Yr ~ ~~Q~ I~LI"t1t2Pf~ ICI"1Vl~ -."~~ '_ >' ~' 0 Box ?~J~OD u~G ~pclIlOlC!/, ~lA 2~1QIi;-Q74~' (~40) 772-2068 1'A~ (54D} 776-71 ~5 l{'tar St.tif Use [)nl}= ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ hn(c rncch~cd: Rcccivcd hy' A~t~lic2tion fc~. ~.f~- PC/t3..,A. ~iai~ 1'laea~ds issued; 1305 dat~ ~ W ~~ ~1SC ~Lt Int7CF ~'~'~-• /[~~n~~{' ~i.y L riP.PI IC. ~NT~S Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ^ Rezoning 1%I Speei.tl iJse ~ Variance C3 Waiver lM7:tdntinistt-ative Appeal C1 Contp Platt ps.z-z?a~} I2cvie~t° Applicants nameladdress ~=Izip Phone: 540-334-9995 Rev. Gary Hoffman, l=aitE3 Fellowship Church Warlt: 540-334-3477 100 Wirtz Rd. Cell ~: 540-814-2044 Wirtz, VA 241$4 Fax lJo : 540-334-1289 O~3mer's Warne/address wlzip Phone tr: 540-814-2044 Rev. Gary Hoffman, Representing Owner: Hoe Wan Chung Wark: 540-334-3477 100 Wirtz Rd. Fax No f.': 540-334-1289 Wirtz, VA 24184 Property Location C' Magisterial Distriat: -W-ins}s~r~-ills- 4108 Electric Road ~ t i ~ Roanoke, VA 4018 Cornrnunity Plannirtg area: ~ ~ Tax Map No.: _O~Z-19-44•:8B-Qeoe- aooa Pxistinn Z.aniaag: C-2 Size of parcel(s): Acras: 1 acre Existing Land Use: Vacant Commercial Space ItEZO11rING, SPECI.~1L Us5'E PE.Ft]tII.T, 1T'riI1~LR :311:D OO11.IP PZfi11' {15.?-aas?) RE l'IEI~' APP.C.IC~iNTS (ItlS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: Proposed Lat;d Use: Churcl~IReligious Assemble (per zoning orclinance) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested disixict? Yes 0 No ^ L1! NO, A VAI2I.ANCE IS REQUIRED FII25T. Does the parcel meet the ininimurrt criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes i~ No d I1! NO, A VARIA.NCI±. IS REQUII2ED FIILST ifrezoning request, are conditions being 13roffered with this request? Yes ~ No !~ V.~.R~T_l1'CE,' F3r1.TYE.~..d.NIJ .~iD1lfINl.STItfiTIYE~-IPP~~~L`f~PPLICANTS (1'/lI'/Ar1) Variancel~tJaiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke Catinty Zoning frdinance in order to: Appeal of Zoninb Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application corrtplete? Please check ifenclosed. APPi.,ICATION ~'ti'~ILL NOT $E ACCEPTED ~ Al\'~' OF' THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE IUSnV1CP Vl:#A FtISnV/C!' VIA A Consultation S 112" x 11" concept t,1an Application I ~~ Metes utd bounds description )usti(ication _ ~, plater and sees=er application 1 ltercby ccrtifZ° that 1 ~trrt eitltcr the o~~=rter of the property or the oGVner's agent ar c n , of tltc ow~ter ~~~~ ~ ~~ Application fee _~ FroFters, if applicab3c Adjoining property a~i'ners p~rcltaser and am acting with the l;ato~~~lcdgc and consent O~a~ner's Si~ttatnre JUS1~T'ICA7']UN irOl2 R~70NlNG, SPACIAL T~51~ P>%RMIT ti~Al'VER OR COMP 1')/_A1`1 (~s z-??3?) RLVIL1~4r .. , .. ~7~QU.la5T5 ~lpplicanl Rev. Gary I-laffman, )vaith 1'ellawship Church The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15..2-zz3?) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in teens of public health, safety, and general Gvelfare Please answer the following questions as t.horougl~ly as possible, Use additional space if necessary. Please explain haw the request furthers the purposes of the Raanalce County Orduaance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning dastrict classilacation irr the Zoning Ordinance We request a "Special Use Permit" to locate a church to be called "Church Vtctonous" in the building at 4108 Electric Rnad, Roanoke, VA, We believe having a church at this location is a service-related organization who will serve tl~e surrounding area and county. Please explain how the project confornrs to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan, The Church will enhance and support the other commercial business's in the area, It will provide a safe, well-maintained and good environment which is consistent with the Roa- noke Community Plan The church will have several roams that will not be occupied in rear of building at present time which will be nice for future growth. The church plans to reface the existing sign on the property and put one an the building itself where there was nee previously, We plan to clean up the existing landscaping anal lighting that is already on the property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts an public services and facilities, including water/sewer, reads, schools, parkslrecreatian and fire and rescue. The aforementioned building has been vacant for a while and it will benefit the surrounding area by cleaning it up and maintaining it. The peak periods for traffic for the church are at times {Sunday morning and future Wednesday evenings} when most of'the surrounding traffic is at low levels.. The building has parking for at least 54 parking places including .3 handicap spaces. The church will seat 230 people. Tl~te church will be a new church plant sa attendance at first will below. The adjacent business has agreed per attached letter to let us use his 12 ad- ditional parkirtg spaces, The Church will have little impact on public services due to minimal meeting times. R -~ ~CONC~I?T PLAN CK~CT~,TST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application.. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential Land use or design issues arising from the request.. In such cases involving rezanings, the applicant may proffer conditions to lirrrit the future use and development ofthe property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations.. The cancept plan should not be confused with the site plan ar plat plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building per3nit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the irritial concept plan, Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezanirrg ar imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan maybe altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.. A cancept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, cortrmunity plan (1~.2-2232) review and variance applications.. the plan should be prepared by a professional site planrrer. The level ofdetail may vary, depending on the nature of the request, The County Planning 17ivision staff may exempt sorxre of-the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the fallowing are considered minirrrura: AL.L APP1:.7CANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres ar square feet and dirr-ensions d.. f_.acatian, names of owners and Raanake County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc,. f.. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties ____ g All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights _ i. Location, widths and natnes of all existing ar platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the developrzaerrt j Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional inforrrsatioia required for° REZONING alyd SPEClAl, CISF I'ERh~IT APPI~lC,4NT~` _ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entratrces/exits, curb openings and crossovers _ m Topography troop in a suitable scale arad contour intervals _____, n. Approximate street grades acrd site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants .,.~. p.. Any proffered conditions at the site and haw they are addressed - _ q. if project is to be phased, please Shaw phase schedule I certify that all iterras required in the cltec 'st above are corrrplete Signature of applicant Date 6 aua r ~: Community Development ,, «~;'. Planning ~ Zoning bivision ~s~a POTFN~L~L OI~ NEE.D FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFF>:C ~MPA.C~ S'I"C.JUY The fallowing is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a mare detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traff=ic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a Got~nty planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VC~DT reserve the right- to request a traffic .study at any time, a.s deemed necessary.) High Traffic-Generating Land Uses: • single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, orApartrnents with mare than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows} • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • l;ducationa!/R.ecreational facilities • Religious assemblies •- Note!/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing har€~e/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory ® [lay care center • Bank • Nan-specific use requests Road Network Situations: a Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 590-ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., R.te 11., ~4, 115, 117, 46Q, 11/460, Z~Q, 2Z1, 419, etc) p For new phases or changes to a development where a previously subrr~itted traffic study is mare than two (2} years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress an roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, irr~provements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.} • bevelapment in an area where there is a known existing traff=ic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/Planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (ion) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750} trips in an average day ~'ffective date: April 19, 20U5 OF R~~:c~ Community Development ti ~~ ,~: ~ Planning & Zoning Division ~~ ~ - •.~ 1836 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPEGIA.L USE PERMIT PETITION PI.ANNJNG COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves floe right to caritinue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Ilse Permit petition if new or additional infoi-inatian is presented at the public hearing. Lf it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written camrn~nts and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Cozz~inissian may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow suff cient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planxririg Canarriission.. Tl~e Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted., POTENTIAL OF NEED T"OR TRAFFIC .ANALYSES ANDIOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if fihe County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Departrzaent of Transportation requests firr.-ther traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of paterxtial land uses arxd situations that ~t~ould necessitate, fur°tlzer study is pr°avided as part of tlxis applicatiarx package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission, lfa continuance is warranfied, the applicant will be notifred of-the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. ,~~~~t:v~ d~~~: Agri! 19, 2vos G L. ~ o f m E,..~ Name of Pet'tio ~, ~1'" petitioner's gnatur t]ate ' L ['. ~ _ ~ _ r it I __ __ 1 __ f~ ~~1 C'Itif)C:`Y l'~~ IIS~:` ~~i'111~1 i~+: `I ifll~~;i ~11 ~'r l~i~F111I 1~ To Whom It May Concern: Faitly Fellowslip Church is located at 100 Wirtz Rd. Wirtz, VA, 1 came to Faith Fellowship in October, 1992 when there were only 30 people. Currently we are running over '100 peo- ple and built a beautiful campus an US 220 in Franklin County, Faith Fellowship has com- mitted to plant and to financially back Church Victorious of the Roanoke Valley. I believe the area in Roanoke is perfect to bring to what has been sa successful in Wirtz. 1 will be leasing the building at 4108 Electric Rd. Roanoke, VA for a minimum of.3 years with an option to purchase.. The plan is to have a 2.30 seat sanctuary, At first attendance will below but we will have the room to grow into 2.30 seats. Our 54 parking spaces will be ade- quate for the size of congregation. The next door dentist offices have also agreed in attached letter to allow us to use their parking facilities for future growth. They do not use their park- ing on Sunday and Wednesday evening. Our purpose is to provide a beautiful, safe, loving, and spiritual environment to the Commu- nity. 1 believe the local retailers and restaurants will also benefit from our being in close prox- imity to them. Church Victorious will be meeting on Sunday mornings and as attendance grows also Wednesday evening. We will not be impacting traffic during the busy times far the area if you have any further questions, please contact me using the information below. In His Service, Pastor Gary Hoffman Church Victorious Faith Fellowship Church 540-334-34'17 (Church) 540-814-2044 (Pastor Mobile preferred} pastor cz faithfellowshipva.arg (E-Mail) irl ~- M a H U ~ ~ ~~g U t r1 'J U W /~ D w 00 cn Poe & C.;`roi~c Real Estate Caroup W 4108 Electric Rd,, )~'ree Standing Bldg, Roanoke, VA Page 1 of 6 4108 ~lec'tric Rd. Pr©perty ID: 15670185 41p8 Blectric Rd, Barry Ward Roanoke, VA 24018 County; Roanoke t. (540) 855-3657 ~l~.,~,-P~~onk ncn~ rsrATe cnoun For Lease Type: Total Space Available: Building Size: Year Built: Date Last Verified: Property ID: Active Retail Free Standing Bldg 10,500 SF 10,500 SF 1979 8/Z 1/2008 15&70185 Available Spaces Suite/ Space Minimum Maximum Rental Date Space Type Sablease Ftoor Available Divisible Contiguous Rate Available Space 1 10,500 5F $10.28 SF/Year immediate Free Standing No Bldg lG.eaSe Type; FINN Additional Information Property Description: The single story building measures approximately 10,500 square Feet The building is constructed in meta[ on a slab and has a stucco exterior. The property measures approximately 1 acre and provides ample parking In Front and in the rear of the building. Features include high ceiling height, ample parking and excellent signage an a 5. Route 419. Location Description: The property is located in Southwest Roanoke County, Virginia within close proximity to Tangiewood Mail and U.S. Route ZZO. The property is adjacent to the newly renovated Madison Square Center and close to the new Panera Bread. The property is located in close proximity to many traffic generators including Tangiewood Mall, area schools and major Roanoke Valley Employers, and khe neighborhoods of Soukh Roanoke and Hunting Hills. It is located on Rt 419 (Electric Road) with an average daily vehicle traffic count of 35,000+. The Roanoke Valley continues to be Virginia' s western center For industry, trade, health, education, travel and entertainment. Zoning bescriptian: aZ Lot Site: 1 AC Crfl5s Streets: Dgden Rd. Traffic Count: 35000 Highlights o Plenty of parking ®Monument sign on Electric Road lrttp://www.loo~net.cam/xNet/L,ooplink/PraEle/Pr`intAll, aspx?still-/17roker/wpcrealtors&L,I.... 8/2b/2008 a Edgard M. Q'Kee~e, DDS /'" '~.,~.~' ~ itobin E. Hinrichs, DDS ~}f}2 >ylectric Rc~~d ® }-~~~i[ : cl~~ciors~.}~lue:rid~eendc~.am~ Rn~au3}ce, Va 2~}t} I S Wets : ~i<<v.~~.t~lue:rSclgee€~cle> cc~€n Pho~7e : (54[)} 772-~75}5 '' l~aa : (54[}) 772-437}Cs August 25, ?Op8 Gary & Diane Hoffman liaith I~ellowship 1 QQ Wirtz Raad Wirtz, VA 24184 Dear Mr. & Mrs.. Hoffman: You and the members of your church have permission to use our pal°Icing facilities on Wednesday evenings and an Sundays. You also have permission from Dr°. Robin E. Hinrichs and from O'ICeefe Properties, LLC, which awns this building. If you have not already done so, you may want to obtain permission from Dr, Peter Kelly wl~a owns 41 Q6 EIectric Road, SW, Roanoke, VA (989-333$),. The northern half of the parking Iat next to his building belongs to him Best wishes, G~ Edward M. O'Keefe, DDS ,G~i., nuyiQr, ¢~ ~ ti ~'M1... ..c~`} I-Ia~Wan Cl~u~~g 5818 Saddleridge Raad Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Septerr~ber 4, ?008 The County of Roanoke Community Development Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive PC3 Bax 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 2401$-0798 Re: Special Use Permit Application for: 410$ electric Road, Roanoke, Virginia 2401.8 Dear Raanal<e Caunty: Please consider this letter as evidence of nay consent far Mr. Reverend Gary Hoffman of Faith Fellowship Church to apply far a Special Use Permit far my property located at 4108 Electric Raad. Mr. Hoffman has rriy per°inission to apply foi° the Special Use Permit and execute documents required for the Special Use Permit. If you have any additional cluestians concerni~ag my consent please contact ~~ne at 540- 774-7311. Sincerely, ~~_ Ha~ Chun g f' V r i ,1.~ 1 f .i ..:... ... :. :. i..a f4 w:,: .n S...u ..-', - -- ...`:... ,r`V......« i.w:' '. ..... _.. r~^L~'i+~i V. :J9:.. ~ s ~.~ x. ~~.~~v~.-• ..r.w ... .. a ,~ ~ P ~ ~ .~ 9 2 ~ dEL. JOLLY LAW fiIRM ' `' "1 (1 r.:.i lJ i; THIS I~EEb made and entered into this 2$tf~ day of Jant~arYr 19$$, by and between Windsor Exchange Corp... a California corporation (hereinafter. „Grantor"), and HaeWan Chung, as her sole and separate equitable estate (hereinafter "Grantee"). - W 1 T N E 5 S E T H- THAT FOR ANA IN CONSIf7ERATInN of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid by the Grantee to the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey, with General Warranty and English Covenants of Title, unto the Grantee, as her sale and separate equitable estate as recognized by the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all of the following lot or parcel of .land situated in the Caunty of F3aanake, State of Virginia, and descrl.bed as follows: ~ AI,L that certain tract of land, together with alI appurtenances thereunto belonging situate in the Caunty of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: tJaw °rncem .lC1L.l.Y. PCACk'. tA[.FHAPRII,L,AMAN P C BEGINNING at an iron pin on the northwest side of Va. State Rt. 41,9 at Point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat of survey; thence Leaving VA. State Itt. 41.9, mnd with the line of the property at IL. Q. Martin, N. 43° 45' 00" W. 129,41 feet to an iron pin at 2; thence continuing with the Martin property, 5. 42° 53' W. 140.00 feet to an iron pin at .3; thence with the line of the property of Silly H. Branch and Jahn C. Glasgow, N. 43° A5' OO" W. 231.24 feet to an iron pin at ~!; thence leaving the Branch and Glasgow property, and with the line of the property of C & S Partnership, N. 46° 1.5' 00" E. 177.15 feet to an iron pin at 5; thence with the line of the property now or formerly owned by 1 c»~+hi '" d S" -~r'k~,. ia`'-~ f'`_~Fr.Y~la-u„er~a_~r +p ~ -~ ~s~ ~S ..-, _ 1~}is s,. ~t;, '~?., ~"~'"~ ~ ry5j, "++ ~"'~'~r'; r [, .~ ^'. ~ r !\Sg'~1? ,,iz fit.: S r' rlvti ~3. ..la~r~ 1 '•rti 1t:7%':. to- ... ~~,,. _.. i.... [ .? d.._. ~L .~ .. _.~ ... i. .. ...~-1 ~. .. ~~1 •t .. .. ~.t -. c a ~- fS ~ K,~ ~R, t [_' ii': This peed is:. made subject to all easements, xestrictionsr and conditions of record affecting the hereinabove-described pxaperty. It is expressly understood and agreed that the conveyance of ~~ } 279 ~ G 0142 l~analfl G. Sink and ,lames D. Fxalin, the following two cat~rses and distances: S. 19° 41' 00" E. 23.60 feet to an iron pin at f, and 5. 43° 45' QO" F. 329.22 feet to an iron pin at 7, and being an the northwest side of Va. State Rt. 419; thence with tha northwest side of Va. State Rt. 413, S. 42° 50' 15" W. 27.$2 feet to an iron pin at Paint 1, the PLAC1~ 0?~ SEGI13t32NG and containing 1.002 acres, as mare particularly shown can plat of survey made by Buford ~. Lumsden & Associates, Certified Land Surveyors, dated May 1, 1975, which survey is recprded in the Clerk"s pffice of the Cirouit Court ,far Roanoke County, Virginia, in ,13eed l~ncsl~. 1fl21, pagE.71~,; and B~TNG the same property conveyed unto the grantor hexeia by deed dated .7anuary 25, 1988, from Andrew P. Hepburn. et als, recorded immediately prior hereta> raw °Frlaaa ,IOLLY~ PLACL'. SLIN a PRILLgMAN.P C the interest in the above-described property to the Grantee is made to her as her sole and separate equitable estate, free from the debts and controls of marital. rightsr including curtesy of any present husband, or any future husband; that she may encumber her interest. in said property or cpnvey the same by her sole act without the union of any husband or any future husband in any conveyance wh~.ch Fho :ntly make with reference thex'etn; and that she in alI respects shall. hold and dispose of same just as thnugYs, she were feme s©],e. 2 ~_.'u.r-w'^,.Fri.i;,?liw;'.+!"it'vfi.~.[^...3ty~.-...'ir~~~..~~"Zi,."Ada.r~w.^:{-;a~'.'.w:'it6{39;.~n"R,..""m.S2i•`^s,+<i..Z"i-:=~s5ss."`~±.,..v.~~..k ~... ,.. ~ . .: .. ... ..:....;_: ~?.?T%1:t'":r~ ~,~ P.EUf'F.k'TS' Or ~ ~L/ ~~ / ~ ~.,.~.~~%~.. 'fir ~~,'~ ~~ ~~~, ~./..r .. 1 ~~.- ~,~. ~~ TAi ti l \~ FlC l7lfi ~ r.~iy.W CtY. J Ef ~:J {T~ ~~I..,.'~~/fi1c~ f ~ I, ~I II ~~, (' ' ~ °~~ ~ _ 1. UDC rt c. ~ '~5 e,e r) L)lVL . ~ , ~i w ? ;n "~ ti • ~ u V~, N F ~ ~ 0 ;~ iss ~ ~~ ~ ~ [~, ~ , C1 ~~ ~ r ~ ~~ 4r • ? . , [ ,~ yr' ~ `Z a~ ~ ~ Ex'=s r. I ~' ~' 1 r ~ .~ ~ r k J. 1 ~ f .~ ,f i P~"oP~4T Y cam' ', ,• 4y \~ .'.~ ~T T~ ti ~ !~ PLAT SHOYII NG PROPERTY TG QE G~HVEYE© TO casr~a~a~.r~~~ sin rfv~~~~r~n~r~aNn~. BY _ B, J. ~;pht~~;~NY ~.-~--~. ~~~y~,~,t,~~i ~~'~, 51TUAT~O IN CAVE S~kfrtG MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT f ~~`' r~'G ROAHOKE GOI111TY, V I RG ! N I A ~,;;r t3uivr T~.~,u~~dc€~ ~~ G~'RT, ~o! ~~ n C!0173 ~ sCntE: r° . 50' unre: !MAY f975 ~ Tf~ a . f . 4~ ~ ~ ~. r ~'v,,~~~~a ~t1KbRD T. Et1YYf3DEAl tr A33ACIA'f"ES trnTlri~a [.nnra suavcvons ROAMOKE, V1RG1l~lA ' _. ~. ~~ c Cry 2~ ° r \ ~ fL ~p r -] n ~--. i€ ~ ~c4 C7, v ~ ~.. ~ :`• c_r ra 1 •ry ~ ti Q~ ~~~ ~ `~ss~ 6~ ~~~I ~ ~ ~ RUC c CL7 ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~S~f ~~®~ p ~ J '} ~~~ ~ ~ J ~~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~~® !. °~' 4 `_ ~ a~ nl `A~9 ~/ • F ~~~ Q ~C ~ ~`~~ ~~ ~a ~`~~ ~S ~. ~~~ ~Q °3 C~ U c~~ c,[ ~~~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ r ,~ ~~ 04 ~~ ,, `Q. ~ fJ ~~. Q ~ ~~ {n' f: CO u 9 ~ v ~ !~ ~ ~~ ~[ f~ ~Cl ~~~ ~~ O ~~ ~- ~ ~~ ~~ Z~ 9 L' L Z ,\~`b r D~ ICJ S ~ l ~~ ~ ~~ ~~-, O~ .--~ C') O O 9 C~ n to ~t ~~ Cb~ U~ ~ `•~ ~~ ~ ~. G, ;-r A~ r--~ I .-. Ii n ~ ~. Ga Q3 ~ S W `~ _~ ~~u n S a a~ ~~x ~ ~ n~~ 5 s ~ S' v s i '- i I I N Z In Q O _~ F U w W ~? {{ u tn~ E o ~ O ' m _ m l~ ~ ; I _ rc > Z O . qt s - ~~ = i ~ 4 d r ~O ~ O n ~ UNZ rti~~ J o <~ w t- ~, ~ ~ ~ N;suDa ~o; )qu '.4iy0 6V!moip ;uawd0ianaG u- sap ~ aryowayas q ~Dy6 laaa 5I~a;~ya~a pau6~s ay) 6upvaq ;ou s)u ud ~ ;oal~ya~o y} )0 uoi5 ualluin )neyllx. ly,vd ~ mw uo w~oi Auv w paanpwtla~ uo paaa7lo 'paidov 'pasn aq ;ou ,(vw Aay; ~s7va;lyam 'sa;oivossc pyo poay6~ouo ;o ,~Vadvld a~vs ay; auv s7uawroop 6wAUOdwo»o puo Ruud sly; Fq paiwlpus ~Ga~uoa puo NJ1530 3H1 310N ~ (a ~ b ~ o I ~ 9 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ e ~'o ,e 's `V 44444 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~y ' ! a a t ~' ~ o c~.. ,~+ ~. I d a~ ~ N *~ ~ ~ af,. ,~ ' /~"r ~ ~v ~,•~ `off M Y ~ ~ ~ , ~ .4; } t'/,`' Y ~!~'+. ~ ~ .p ~°8 - ~'• ~ `~~ ~t ,.~'~~y` ~ did. Ca `Sx~ Y~x`:~ ~, °" 7 fis ~. ,_ ~ L , s, ~`t ~ ~ ~'~ ~. ~ ~ ~"•~ `a ~ ~ ~.f 8 t 4 ~ ~ .~ a A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ';r • ? / ',~' ~~~pf A ~. fit'°`'. ~ 4 J ~ ~ ~~- t . ,,.' ~ ~ '~: ~ ~ ~.~ t ~x .. ~~:r,- '~ _ ,. t,.~ ~ ",.~, ~~.~. - ~- - ,r. j.'. IL 1 I ~ .-: _ w FY'; ~c Y~-- \-~ _ fie' .T ~ m ` ' 4 _ ,~ ~_ . Y ~r ~ ~ y~ 1 4 4 ~ir_ t ~K kc i T~ 3 ~ ~¢y ~ 'a J 7 -. e 1 ~~ r r_ r yy~1 ' h 4 % ' ~~ I ~-~3 ~ L.~~ 1 A '~ qqqq III ~'1' ~* ~ ~ ,, ~ :_ ,1,,,~ r'~ x.~.:: ~,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*~~~. i ~ ~-. :y" ~r ~ ~ t* ri a i 'k ~ - : `~ r~ 6 ~~ ~ ~sp:i~ - f t ~-tin ~ {~:.`~ y, h,~ ;t4. 3k «. ~_~ ~~ ~~ t ,1 ~, i y 'M c ldp ayt ~f ^L' ?.t , S1 s~ ;r ~ ~, a ,; ~ LL ~, , l - '~ U * r n fir,.. ~. ~ n'~a ~ (.~ YM :7' ~ ~ '~; f/1 ~~ < ?-Xa\, ~~ ~ Y..L }' ~ .~ G. O ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ e,. ~ ~ ~ m ~! ., ~~ ,t~, °; ~ O , - \! --_ ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ :~ ~/~i V: ~ O ~ M ~_. ~ V ~ : 1` P~ ~ M r! - ~ ~ s ~ f t , ~ . ~ !'~ ('~ ~ 1~ ', l~ ~ U ;q>y.~~ ~ j~ ~ c: Y L ~ ~ , ,• ~ ~ ~ r~ O ' ~ W ;~,~ ,. t, ~. ,~, ,,~ ~; ~ p ~}~ 1 i , L 4~, ~' { ) '~~ ~~~~ _, ,' ; .~ ~r ~s ~ ~~ Y . t ~ ~~ ~ t~~' ~~ ~' ~ ~ 7f f r~~f ~ ±fi,l 7At F.r... i aM >4 ,; r-- ~, . ~~y+~u,~~_ ~. v ~ ,~~ i ~ ~ ~ • i. ~,r I 1 ,_ ` ~' o f ~ i ~ "~~~ ~~S is ~ }~ ~r a ti~ ~ a +d N-._ c Y ~~ r 4 t 45 ,~ . 3.. a i f1 i ,~,(r 1' r, ~ 1,.. ~ . ,..`.:4 t 4 ,~ ~M ~' :~ _.,~.~ 4 ~,. ~, ~~1 .~ '~~;~ .~ .5 ,; t r ', ;. ,~ '~~R'y~~ - ~~~'.yy ,~ 11~~ 1 1~~ r'AS a ~ ~ '~'~ s - ~. s !~ *a~-IS ~ ~~ , ~ 1 r J~ p~ 4 / rw ~ ~ -,~ ~- ~ :~ ', Y ~. 3r ! ~ Y gyp' ~ .~, ,C: !' A t ~ ~i.Scie) ;~ _ 1, ~' Y' ~ _?_ _ ' ~~! ~. 1 _. :~ y 1., Fyy:~~ G' "! ~ M ~ _ !. F a ,~ s :t. ti a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~~ ~ K, ~~. '~~~. `~ ~ -~ L' - ~" ~' t~t, _ ~]~ ~ r. 1 . a ~ > ?'.~.: . '. s 1 Ye S. 1 .~~{ O t, . - -~,; ~3~;" Q tMi.i"',iR.gc ' ~. ~ ^ F 4y~~191 ~ ~ J ` ; X +f;Y+~. S lD[ P1 .~,' ,~ ~: ..C~ ~~~ "T~~ t ! 'a ~~ ~ ~9 ~ 3 ~, ,~ ~: tip- ti_ '',', I' ~ +- T M *' ~. _- 1 R ~ ~~• 1 L ' ' r ,,y; -- ~ r~ ~ 3 ~'?: 1 :~ _~_~~ ~ ~*'P~ ; ~~ .a ~~ ~1 i ~~ -'4' I II _i ^I ~--~ >~ ~--' ~ ~ U (~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ o Q 0 0 ~~ a~ N Applicants Name: Faith Fellowship Church Roanoke County Existing Zoning: C2 Department of Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number: 077.19-01-14.00-0000 Community Development Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 1 Acre 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' Roanoke County Department of Community Development Transition _ Core - Principal Industrial N Applicants Name: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Tax Map Number: Magisterial District Faith Fellowship Church C2 C2S 077.19-01-14.00-0000 Cave Spring Area: 1 Acre 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' ARTICLE III.. DISTRICT R.E,GiJLATIO~s Page l of 5 SEC. 30-54, C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-54-'I, P~~rpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended far general application throughout the county. General commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C_2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and care land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses, (Qrd. No 0422fl8-16, § 1, 4-22-QS) Sec. 3A-54-2. Permitted Uses, (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to aft other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance, An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article lV, use and design standards, far those specific uses. 1. Residenfiat Uses Accessory Apartment Home BeautylBarber Salon'` Home Qccupa#ion, Type l Multi-l=amity Dwelling Two-Family Dwelling'` 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center educational Facilities, College/University l~ducational Facilities, PrimarylSecandary "` Family Day Care Nome Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Past Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services l~ttp://libraiy4.municode.cornldefault/DocView/12222111120/12.3 1012$12008 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT RECULAT1nNS Utility SeNices, Minor 3 Dffice Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural SeNices Antique Shops Automobile ©ealership, New A~~tomobile Repair SeNices, Minor Automobile RentallLeasing Automobile PartslSupply, Retail Bed and Breakfast Boarding House Business Support Services Business ar 3"rade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Cammerciai Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications SeNices Construction Sales and Services "` Consumer Repair Services Funeral SeNices Garden Center'" Gasoline Station Hospital HoteilMatellMotor Lodge Kennel, GDmmerClal Pawn Shop Personal lmpravement SeNices Personal SeNiCeS Restaurant, General Retail Sales Page 2 of S http:l/izbrary4.rraunicacle~com/default/DacViewll2222/1/120/12.3 10/28/2008 ARTICLE III„ DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 3 of 5 Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower *" Parking Facility (B) The fallowing uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19 An asterisk {*} indicates additional, modified nr more stringent standards as listed in article 1V, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic, Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business Automobile Dealership, Used * Au#omobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash Commercial lndnor Amusement Convenience Store "' Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Horne Sales Mini-warehouse Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreations[ Vehicle Sales and Service Restaurant, Drive-in and Fast Fond Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. fndusfrial CJses Custom Manufacturing * Landfill, Rubble * 1~tkp://library4.municode,con~/default/DocView112222/1/120/123 10/28/2808 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 4 of S Transportation Terminal 4 Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings (Ord.. Na. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. Na. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord, No. 042799-1 1, § 2, 4-2799; Ord. No 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord.. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. Na, 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 34-54-3. Site ©eve[opment Regulations. Genera! Standards. Far additional, modified, ar more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article 1V, Use and Design Standards. (A)Minimum !of requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre {43,560 square feet), b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a Area: 15,000 square feet b. Frontage: 75 feet an a publicly owned and maintained street. (B)Minimum setback requirements.. 1 Front yard: a, Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principe! structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet, 4 Where a lot fronts an more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets . (C)Maximum height of structures. 1 Height limitations: a.. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each req~~ired side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 ar R-2 district is increased two feet for each fact in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures. actual height of principal structure, (D)Maximum coverage, I~ttp:/llibrary4.municode,cam/default/DacView/12222/I/120/12.3 1 Q/28/200$ ARTICLE ID.. DISTRICT REGULATtON~ 1 Buiiding coverage: 50 percent of the total iat area. 2. Lat coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. Na. 62293-12, § 10, ~-22-93) Page 5 of 5 http://library~.znunicade..cam/defaultlDacView/I2222/III20/I2.3 10/28/200$ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR 'fHE PURPOSE OF RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY ON 1.0 ACRES LOCATED AT 4108 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 77.19-1-14) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON 'fHE PETITION OF FAITH FELLOWSHIP CHURCH WHEREAS, Faith Fellowship Church has filed a petition for a special use permit for the purpose of religious assembly to be located at 4108 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 77.19-1-14) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 3, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on October 28, 2008; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on November 11, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Faith Fellowship Church for the purpose of religious assembly located at 4108 Electric Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1 (1) The maximum seating in the principal place of worship shall not exceed accommodations for 230 people. (2) The access drive shall not be utilized for parking and shall remain unobstructed for fire and rescue apparatus. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of tl'iis ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 PETITIONER: Cherney Development CASE NUMBER: 25-11/2008 Board of Supervisors Consent 1St Reading Date: October 28, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 3, 2008 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2"d Reading Date: November 11, 2008 A. REQUEST To rezone approximately 4.75 acres from R-3C, Medium Density Multi- Family Residential District with Conditions, to C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing an office building located between the 2300 block and 2400 block of Electric Road and 2315 Bridle Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Joyce Taylor of 5206 Stoneybrook Drive spoke in favor of the petition, and asked if a fence could be constructed along the property line adjoining Stoneybrook Drive neighbors. Ken Landgraft of 2129 Bridle Lane spoke in favor of the petition, and referred to a letter he wrote to the Planning Commission in support of the petition. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Holladay presented the staff report. Mr. Radford inquired about the formula for increasing building height in the C-1 zoning district based on increased building setback. Mr. Radford also inquired about abandonment of the undeveloped section of Bridle Lane. Ms. Goodlatte, counsel for the petitioner, presented additional information about Mr. Cherney's interaction with the neighborhood during a previous unsuccessful attempt to change the zoning on the property, as well as during a community meeting prior to submitting the current petition. Ms. Goodlatte also confirmed that the Mr. Cherney would agree to constructing a fence per the neighbors' wishes, and that he would have no problem working out the vacation of the undeveloped Bridle Lane, but that the request was outside the scope of this petition and legislative action. Mr. Radford stated that he had received two favorable telephone calls regarding the petition. D. CONDITIONS (as submitted prior to public hearing, not including new proffer #9) 1. The properties will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan dated September 4, 2008 titled "Route 419 Office Complex Prepared for Cherney Development", prepared by Parker Design Group, subject to those changes which may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2. The office building will be developed in substantial conformity with the Building Elevation Concepts dated August 21, 2008 titled "New Facility for Cherney Development", prepared by Interactive Design Group. 3. The subject properties shall be used only for those office uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district. 4. Access to the office building shall be only from Electric Road. Neither Stoneybrook Drive nor Bridle Lane shall be used to provide access to the office building. 5. All parking lot lighting shall be post-top fixtures no more than twelve (12) feet high with fully concealed fixtures and arranged so glare is not cast onto the adjoining properties. 6. All utilities serving the office building shall be underground. 7. The dumpster shall be serviced between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 8. The proposed freestanding sign shall be a monument style sign and shall be designed to generally match the architecture and material of the office building. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. Radford made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning petition with the addition of a ninth proffer to construct a fence along the northwest boundary where the property adjoins neighbors along Stoneybrook Drive. The motion passed 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ..._..._ ......_ 11! 05/ 2008 11:24 3369222418 Pc;GE Gil ~' 02 A dr s of ~ttjPct PronPrCi a: 2400 Block Electric Road 2315 Bridle Lane SW Windsor Hills Magisterial Distnet Roanoke County Tax Man Nos_; 076:11-03-75.00-0000 076.11-0376.00-0000 Pre,~ni oninn' R3C Medium Density Multi-family Residential w/conditions P~[stppslyd.Z,gDina: C1C Office Districtw/conditions A~nl~l -,ant's Narr~~: James R. Chemey rte; James R. Chemey j?8f1.E'FER S Tha undersigned owner/applicant does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with rezoning .....application: 1. The properties will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan dated Septembe[ 4, 2008 titled "Route 419 Office Complex Prepared for Chemey Development", prepared by Parker Design Group, subject to those changes ~rohich may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2, Tha office building will be developed In substantial conformity with the Building Elevation Concepts dated August 21, 2008 trifled "New facility for Chemey Development", prepared by Interactive Design Group. 3, The subject properties shall be used only for khose office uses, permitted in the C-1 zoning district 4. Access to Che office building shall be only from Electric Road. Neither 5toneybrook Drive nor Bridle Lane shall be used to provide access to the office building. 5. , Ah parking lot lighting shall be post-Cop fixtures no more then twelve (12) feet high with fully concealed fixtur®s and arranged so glare is not oast onto the adjoining properties. 6, Alt utilities serving the office building shall be underground. 7. The dumpstcr shall be serviced between 7:00 a,m. and 10:00 p, m. 8, The proposed freestanding sign shall be a monument style sign and shall be designed ko generally match the architecCure and material of the office building. 9, A six (6) foot high fence shall be orected within the NW buffer yard adjoining the rear yards of th® residential properties fronting on 5koneybrook Drive. Dated. this 5 th day of November 2008 Respe .tf~N~ubmitted, .-~ - ~ James R. Chemey STAFF REPORT Petitioner: James R. Cherney Request: Rezone approximately 4.75 acres from R-3C to C-1 C Location: 2300/2400 Block Electric Road, 2315 Bridle Lane Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Proffered 1. The properties will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan Conditions: dated September 4, 2008 titled "Route 419 Office Complex Prepared for Cherney Development", prepared by Parker Design Group, subject to those changes which may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2. The office building will be developed insubstantial conformity with the Building Elevation Concepts dated August 21, 2008 titled "New Facility for Cherney Development", prepared by Interactive Design Group. 3. The subject properties shall be used only for those office uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district. 4. Access to the office building shall be only from Electric Road. Neither Stoneybrook Drive nor Bridle Lane shall be used to provide access to the office building. 5. All parking lot lighting shall be post-top fixtures no more than twelve (12) feet high with fully concealed fixtures and arranged so glare is not cast onto the adjoining properties. 6. All utilities serving the office building shall be underground. 7. The dumpster shall be serviced between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 8. The proposed freestanding sign shall be a monument style sign and shall be designed to generally match the architecture and material of the office building. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: James Cherney is petitioning to change the zoning on approximately 4.75 acres from R-3C to C-1 C in order to construct an office building. The proposed building would be located generally in the center of the property, with a single entrance from Electric Road serving a network of parking around the building. The proposed 70,617 square foot office building would be approximately 75 feet in height. The 5-story building would contain 17,217 square feet on each of the first 3 floors, with smaller areas of 9,483 square feet in the 4th and 5th floors. In 2006, the petitioner applied to amend the existing conditions on the property in order to construct a mix of townhouses and condominiums, with access from Electric Road and Bridle Lane. That petition met with opposition from the neighborhood, and was withdrawn from consideration before Planning Commission public hearing. Since that time, James Cherney revised his development proposal, and held a community meeting with the neighborhood prior to submitting the current rezoning petition. At the August 21st community meeting, the citizens expressed appreciation for the single proposed entrance from Electric Road, and no access from Bridle Lane. Citizens also expressed appreciation for the proposed office use as opposed to multi-family/townhouse use. Mr. Cherney is proposing several "green building" concepts in hopes of having the building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System. Per the developer's plans, the 3~d floor roof is proposed as a green roof, with grass and shrubs covering the roof, and forming a courtyard next to the fourth floor section of the building. Storm water detention is proposed in underground cisterns. Water from these cisterns would be used for landscape irrigation, and possibly for wastewater (toilets). The proposed development conforms with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and the 419 Frontage Development Plan. In the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, the majority of the site is designated Transition, with a portion designated Neighborhood Conservation. Office uses are encouraged as well as a high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design. The proffered site and building plans, as well as the green building concepts, conform with the policies and guidelines of the Transition future land use designation. The portion of the site that contains the single family dwelling is designated Neighborhood Conservation. However, considering that the access to the home is through an unimproved section of Bridle, the dwelling is physically separated from the remainder of the surrounding neighborhood. Also considering that the access from unimproved Bridle Lane would cease as per the proffered development plan, the best use for the home site is arguably as part of the proposed development, rather than remain a single family dwelling. The 419 Frontage Development Plan, dated February 1987, is adopted by reference into the Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated Transition in the 419 Plan. The 419 Plan has goals, design guidelines and implementation strategies to encourage quality economic development along Electric Road, and avoid haphazard strip development of the corridor. The proffer statement and proffered site plans incorporate many of these design concepts. The proposed rezoning is the result of months of plan revisions, interaction with County staff, and most importantly, interaction with the citizens in the neighborhood. The proposed development plan and statement of proffers are sensitive to the surrounding commercial and residential land uses as well as environmental conditions. In addition to the proffered site and building elevation drawings, the petitioner has provided perspective drawings to show how the building fits on the site and relates to the surroundings. The LEED certification that the petitioner is seeking is strongly encouraged, and should be integral to future Roanoke County comprehensive planning. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Roanoke County site development review is required. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) approval is required for new commercial entrance to Electric Road. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - In 1982 the subject properties were rezoned from R-1 to R-3C in order to construct townhomes. The two conditions from the 1982 legislative action required that 1) The townhouse units will be for sale only, and 2) Approval to construct an entrance to Route 419 from the subject property to be obtained by others. One of the properties is 0.455 acre and contains a single family dwelling constructed in 1945. The second 4.255-acre property has remained undeveloped and has been used for agricultural production. In May, 2006, James Cherney petitioned to amend the proffered conditions on the two properties in order to construct a mix of townhouses and condominiums, and to have a second driveway entrance from Bridle Lane. After hearing significant opposition from neighbors, Mr. Cherney withdrew the application before the Planning Commission public hearing. Since that time, Cherney Development redesigned the project to an office development. Prior to submitting this latest rezoning petition, Cherney Development personally contacted neighbors around the site, and presented the development plans. A synopsis of that August community meeting is given below. Topographv/Vegetation -Topography is generally flat, and on grade with Bridle Lane, but below the grade of Electric Road. A tributary of Mudlick Creek flows along the southwest property line. Downstream from Electric Road to the confluence with Mudlick Creek, the floodplain of this stream is mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Upstream from Electric Road, and through the site, the floodplain is not mapped by FEMA, and the developers will have to establish the limits of the 100-year floodplain during the engineering design of the site. Preliminary floodplain engineering was performed by 2 the developers prior to locating the proposed building, and the approximate floodplain lines are depicted on the proffered site plan. Vegetation consists of mainly an agricultural field, most recently used for corn production. The frontage along Electric Road contains trees and brush along approximately half of the front property line. The area around the creek, along the rear property line is wooded and is anticipated to remain undisturbed during site development as both stream protection and buffer yard. Surrounding Neighborhood -Properties to the northwest and southwest are zoned R-1, and contain single family dwellings. Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church adjoins to the south, and is zoned R-1. Property to the southeast is zoned C-1 C, and contains an insurance office. Properties to the northeast, across Electric Road are zoned C-1, and contain a variety of office and financial uses. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site LavoutlArchitecture -One 70,617 square foot office building is shown on the concept plan. The building footprint is generally square and situated toward the center of the property. The proposed building is 5 stories, with a building height of 75 feet. The first three floors would each be 17,217 square feet, and the 4th and 5th floors would be 9,483 square feet. The top two floors would be constructed at the front of the building, with the shorter side of the building facing toward the adjoining residential neighborhoods. Variations in each facade would break up the wall mass and provide detail relief to the structure. Exterior materials consist of a combination of brick and masonry and varying colors to offer further relief and contrast to each side of the building. Both the site development concept plan and the building elevation plans are proffered with this rezoning petition. In addition to the proffered site and building elevation drawings, the petitioner has provided perspective drawings to show how the building fits on the site and relates to the surroundings. Building height in the C-1 zoning district is limited to 45 feet when adjoining the R-1 zoning district, unless additional setback distance is provided. In the C-1 district, building height may be increased 1 foot for each 2 feet of additional yard separation from the residential property line. Using this formula, the proposed building is located 95.5 feet from the nearest (southwest) residential property line, which would allow up to 80 feet of building height. The petitioner is proposing several "green building" concepts in hopes of having the building certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System. Per the LEED website, the green building rating system "is a voluntary, consensus-based national rating system for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings. LEED addresses all building types and emphasizes state-of-the-art strategies in five areas: sustainable site development, water savings, energy efficiency, materials and resources selection and indoor environmental quality." Per the developer's plans, the 3~d floor roof is proposed as a green roof, with grass and shrubs covering the roof, and forming a courtyard next to the fourth floor section of the building. Storm water detention is proposed in underground cisterns. Water from these cisterns would be used for landscape irrigation, and possibly for wastewater (toilets). Other energy efficiency components are being explored with building design. Buffer yards are shown on the concept plan along the northwest and southwest property lines where the project adjoins residential properties. The northwest buffer yard is shown at 40 feet, larger than the required 30 foot buffer yard, with typical landscape screening installed. The southwest buffer yard is a minimum of 40 feet, and includes the area around the Mudlick Creek tributary. This area would remain undisturbed along the creek banks and existing vegetation would serve as landscape screening. AccesslTraffic Circulation -Access is proposed via a single two-way driveway connecting to Electric Road. New VDOT Access Management regulations require the entrance to be at least 325 feet from any adjoining commercial entrance, thus the separation between the proposed entrance and the next driveway to the south. Distance from the proposed entrance to Stoneybrook Drive is over 400 feet. The concept plan shows a 175 foot taper and 200 foot turn lane on the right turn approach to the proposed entrance. Internal traffic circulation on the site would be through a network of parking lots surrounding the building. VDOT comments included alerting the petitioner of procedures and processes for construction of a new commercial entrance, including minimum construction standards, sight distance, right turn lane warrant analysis, and ultimately a land use permit for construction in the state right of way. The proposed office use does not exceed the threshold of 150,000 square feet that would trigger the need for a traffic impact analysis. Fire & Rescue/Utilities -Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department staff asked for consideration of water at the site and building access for Fire and Rescue apparatus. Delineation of appropriate/required fire lanes and fire suppression systems will be accomplished during site development review. Public water and sanitary sewer services are available to the property. A 12-inch water line runs along the front property line within the Electric Road right-of-way. Two parallel sanitary sewer lines run beside the creek at the rear of the property. Community Meeting - Prior to submitting this application to rezone the subject properties, Cherney Development held a community meeting at Good Shepherd Lutheran Church on August 21, 2008. Approximately 32 citizens attended along with the petitioner, his design team and legal counsel. The petitioner presented his latest concept, including multiple views, perspectives and elevations of the proposed building. The citizens expressed appreciation for the single proposed entrance from Electric Road, and no access from Bridle Lane. Citizens also expressed appreciation for the proposed office use as opposed tomulti-family/townhouse use. The petitioner discussed his concepts for green building and site design, including a partial grass roof, re-use of detained storm water for landscape irrigation, and maintaining the existing vegetation in the riparian areas along the creek. Other issues or concepts that were discussed included building height, underground utilities, lighting, landscaping and signage. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN In the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, the majority of the site is designated Transition, with a portion designated Neighborhood Conservation. The 4.255-acre undeveloped tract is designated Transition, and the 0.455-acre home site is designated Neighborhood Conservation. The Transition designation is a future land use area that encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Office uses are encouraged as well as a high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design. The proffered site and building plans, as well as the green building concepts, conform with the policies and guidelines of the Transition future land use designation. The portion of the site that contains the single family dwelling is designated Neighborhood Conservation. However, considering that the access to the home is through an unimproved section of Bridle, the dwelling is physically separated from the remainder of the surrounding neighborhood. Also considering that the access from unimproved Bridle Lane would cease as per the proffered development plan, the best use for the home site is arguably as part of the proposed development, rather than remain a single family dwelling. The 419 Frontage Development Plan, dated February 1987, is adopted by reference into the Comprehensive Plan. The 419 Plan has goals, design guidelines and implementation strategies to encourage quality economic development along Electric Road, and avoid haphazard strip development of 4 the corridor. The 419 Plan encourages buildings to be prominent from the public street view, using the building architecture as a means of business advertisement. The 419 Plan encourages building scale appropriate to the lot size and taller buildings should be only allowed in Transition areas on large lots where additional setback distance is available. Monument signs that compliment the building exterior and appropriate screening and buffering are also encouraged in the 419 Plan. The proffer statement and proffered site plans incorporate many of these design features. The 419 Plan contains Future Land Use designations that are tied to the Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated Transition in the 419 Plan. The proposed development conforms with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and the 419 Frontage Development Plan. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed rezoning is the result of months of plan revisions, interaction with County staff, and most importantly, interaction with the citizens of the neighborhood. The proposed development plan and statement of proffers are sensitive to the surrounding commercial and residential land uses as well as environmental conditions. In addition to the proffered site and building elevation drawings, the petitioner has provided perspective drawings to show how the building fits on the site and relates to the surroundings. The LEED certification that the petitioner is seeking is strongly encouraged, and should be integral to future Roanoke County comprehensive planning. The proposed development conforms with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, and the 419 Frontage Development Plan. CASE NUMBER: 25-1112008 PREPARED BY: David Holladay HEARING DATES: PC: 1113108 BOS: 11/11/08 ATTACHMENTS: Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Application Materials Cherney Neighborhood Meeting Letter VDOT comment letter R-3 Zoning District Regulations C-1 Zoning District Regulations N Applicants Name: James R. Cherney Roanoke County Existing Zoning: R3C Department of Proposed Zoning: C1 C Tax Map Number: 076.11-03-75.00-0000; -76.00-0000 Community Development Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 4.70 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: James R. Cherney Existing Zoning: R3C Proposed Zoning: C1 C Tax Map Number: 076.11-03-75.00-0000; -76.00-0000 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 4.70 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' County of Roanoke Community Development PEanning & Zoning 5?Q4 Bernard Drive P {~ Box 29800 Roarroke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (5~0} 776-7155 For Staff Use Only ~~ ~'w ~ ~~~: U v~ bate Eeceivcd:~ ~~~ Received by: ~~~ (~ ~ r fr.gt7liCalEOrr tCe: "", .. P{/Q~A d3rC: _ ~ ~ fL~~~~~ "'~'~~ PlacaEds issued: $a5 dare; CaseNumUer aC~ „~. ~ ~ ~~~~ AL,1. ,APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (cltecl: all that apply) g.CRezorrittg G Special Use ~ Variance L'4'Vaiver C7 Adrnitristrative Appeal t~. Comp Flan jt5.z-zz3x) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: atnes R. C~lerrtey Work: 5-60 Shattalon Dr~.ve, X28 Cell n: Wizlston Salem, NC ~~1fl6 Fax No Otivner's name/address whip Fltane ~: Wor{t: Same as Applicant Fax No #: Property ]..ocation ROtite ~l9 near irttersecta an of Staneybrook Drive Magisterial Dis€rict: ~it7aSOr N1llS . ana Br~.ale Laney S.W. Cortrntunity Planning area: La1TlaSOr Mills Tax Map Na : 0~6. ~.~ -o3-~s.oo-OOOO ana a~fi.~.~.-o~-~~.oa-oooo 1MxistingZoning: Ric Size of parcels}: Acres: 1~.. 7C1 Existing Land Use: j~esld~l:llt;lal ~ Vc~C~itt REZONING, SPECIAL IISE PERMIT; FVAIYER AND CgtY1PP.GAN (rs z-z?3r} REYIEI3' APPI,ICArYT'S (R/SIW/CI') Proposed Zoning: t/l~ Proposed 1. and Use: CamtnElr'Cia~ ~ O~~lce ~El~.laing Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested d'€strict'? Yes X No IF N4, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does ilte parcel meet the minimum cr#teria for the requested Use Type? Yes X iVo IF N4, A VARIANCI; IS REQUIRED I;IRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, If~AIV.R.ANDADrY,CINISTRATIV.~'APPEAL.APPLIC~3NTS(Y/rf~/.~fA) Variance/W giver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal ofZoning Adrninistrator'sdccision to Appeal of ]ntetpretatian of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Qrdinance Appeal of Interpretation o! Zoning i19ap to Is the application complete? Please check ifenctased AFFI.ICATION ~VII.,L NOT I3E ACCEFTGD 1F AN1' OF THESE ITGiYIS AR1M l~I1SSING OR 1NCOi4IFLGTE tusnv/cr v1AA Coruuitation Application Justification J hereby certify that 1 am either the of the owner 8 112" x I l~oncept plan f I Application fee Ivletes tf"lraunds description "'fin; proffers, if applicabEe er and sewer applica' Adjoining prop<:rty owners ~epr rtyartheo~vner'sage t r onrr tpirn/has f ny~,maetingwiththeknowledgeandconsent ~ ~ / ~-'~~~ Qr~~rer's Sidnatute ames R. C ern . 2 .IUSTIFICATION FOR Ri!:,~ONING, SPE~CIAI.~ lJSE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (t5.2-223z} RCVIEW REQUESTS. Applicant James R. Gherne The Planning Commission wiEl study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan {15,2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. CJse additional space if necessary.. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose Found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.. The Cattnty's zoning ordinance recognizes that a C-1 district is most appropriately fo~znd slang ar near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has acct.trred or commercial zoning has been established and near existing residential development: where it can serve as a logical bttffer strip between conflicting land t~se types. This proposed office building on Rot.tte 419 provides an appropriate rise for a major arterial street while serving as a buffer for adjacent residential neighborhoods. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in €he Roanoke County Community Plan„ Raanalce Caattt•tty's 20QS f',ammttnity Plan designates the property in gttestian as "transition". The transition ftitttre land use is a ttse which encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Typically, transition areas serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. A proposed office development an this parcel is a ttse compatible with the transition designation. The 419 frontage development plan notes that 4~.9 frontage parcels should be reserved for office and commercial development where possible. Please describe the impact{s} ofthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including waterlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. 'There will be na negative impact on the starraunding area ar public services and facilities. In fact, permitting this acreage to be used for office rather than townhome use t;as ct.trrently permitted) eases the pressure on local schools. 3 a~xoa~ Community D~veiopment ~ ~ ~ ~ " -~ Punning & Zoning ©ivision +~ ~~ ~a~.. NOTICE T4 APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION 'WAIVER,, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, UR SPECIAL TJSE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDUR}; The Roanoke County Planning Camznission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Pen•nit petition if new ar additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public heating that sufficient time was not available for planning staff andlor an outside refezral agency to adequately evaluate and pzovide wzitten comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public heaxing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. Tkris continuance shall allow sufficient time foz all necessary zeviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and pzovide written comments and suggestions to be included in a wzitten memorandrtm by planning staff to the Planning Commission, The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance maybe wazxanted. POTEa`TTIAL OP NEED FOR. TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT' STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Comrission reserves tlxe right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waivez, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Pezmit petition if the County Transportation lµ.ngineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests fuzthez tzaffic analyses andlor a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential laud uses ar:d situations drat wotslrl necessitate firrtlter• stzsdy is provided a.s part of this application paclca~e) This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing patties to evaluate the tequixed traffic analyses and/oz traffic itxzpact study and to pzovide wzitten comrents and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission.. If a continuance is wazxanted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public bearing date, Effective Date: April 19, 2005 ,3ames R. Cherne N ~ of Pe "ti6n .~-0.~ ---~ t` tuner's Signature ~% z c~ Date CQIVCEP'[ PT~AIV CI-T)CCICI.,ISI~ A concept plan afthe proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use cltange, development or variance that is to be considered Further, fire plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request In such cases invoiv'sng rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development ofthe property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County perrnitiing regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is requited prior to the issuance of a 6ui€ding permit. Site plan and bui€ding permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development tegutations and may require changes to the initial concept plan Unless limiting conditio€ts ate pr offered and accepted in a rezoning nr imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to rite extent permitted by the zonin; district and other regulations A concept plan is rerltrired tivitlt all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (l5 2-2232) review and variance appiicatians Tltc plan should be prepared lay a professional site planner 7'he level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request The County planning Division staff may exempt some of the items orsuggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL- APPC.iCANI S ~ a.. Applicant name and name of development X b Date. scale and north arraa' ~ c. L-ot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d Location, names of owners and Ctoanake County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X c Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc X f. Ilte zoning and fond use of all adjacent properties ~ g Ail property lines and easements x h Ali buildings, existing; and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent tv the development ~ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, pari`ing spaves and leading spaces Additional ir~orrnatiorr required for RGZONlNG acrd SPGCI~f,G CISE PGRrtifll`:fPPL.lC'~INTS x k I/xistinf; utilities (water, se4ver, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1 Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers X m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of ail adjacent fire hydrants ~ p Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed ~ q if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule items required :y-ih~lt~l.-f~~above are complete Signature of applicant ~ .lames R . C~terney ~_~ Z-- l..7 c~ Date ~~~ b eNI~IA'~auno~ aHoueoa ~ g ~ s ICI 3~IASIU IeNa1516eW SlllH ~osPWM s ~c ;uawdo~anaQ /(au~ay~ ~o; pa~eda~d ~ e > ~ ~ ~a xa~dwo~ a~i~0 6~b a;nod{ ~ ~ I I ~. a i m o. ~ ~° a - ~ a~ emg ~ _ ~ ~" o ~ Q n o o~ .n m a m o m m' ~ o m ~ N ~ _ ¢ ~ m'o ~ 3 ~ ~ a E m ~ o m o 0 2 2 2 c `~~ m ~ y~~ d 0 0 y S ~ o 5~3. 5pg 2` o E rb # C ~i ¢ r ~ ~ m y c ry '~v ~' m ~ - ° 5 `m ' a x ~ - ~ =moNg ^. I'n iolm3 Sg TFm'°a =mm''a 'd dg -m c ~i L ~ ~ S o` n v8-°$ggg ~m~o °'m'o'o 8ao~ ~ ~ ~ azi E _$° ~ ~ (n° a 2 2 t~ ~ - m ~ ~' w ~ X 3 3 ~~ O1 3 3 _ o $ ~ ~ ~ ~ - a ~ 2 0 0 ~ r ~ ~ ~ .n - - 5 'm - -8i _ = ~ ~ E _ ._ 8 ~~ .~ - - ~m m m __ _ - v ~ ro m ~ rn oni ~= n ° c ¢ v $ _ a o (n >qn maa o` rn a°'d $A ~ m `m ~ aaj n~ c9~ rn ~O~eU cm'in °' Hx xcgU~ Ny ~ ~ ~ ~ m= ~~~A E .y Fa-~^o2_d~m„a 9ma ~a~_`--c~~'° ~~ ~ ~ a ~ _~ y `H~°m boo ~<?~ 'S orv»m~i inzm' m' m' m'~~~ am a ~ ~ z ~ T R m `, m ~ ;~c o c~om W - Er°-N°m$ d > > ~ > yy >$ S 8i~ ~ ¢ v d 3 W ~¢> a cp`a ~ ~ x.o ~88.5~ ~ ~E a ~n m Q ~ ~ ~ oon ~ ~ n € `c= ; o0 (/)fir w`ww`a`w`~ f a~ws ~ ¢w ~ m' a n` ~ r m~,3m v ^w ~ u; ~' W o / J~p y Av ~~ au ri° W ~~;' `ca ~ o ~ ~, :~~. wo~..ia i o~w m a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o UN / r /~~_ ° e c3 U a ~ E a u° L II + a w? - c`Y Y ~ ~ 6 ° ~ I _-_ o ~ L ~ Z L ~/ ~ / ;/ J ~ on _ \ ~~ ~ ~ Edo ``S U ~ ~ 2 ~/'~' ~ ~ . \ I'^ ~ ' ~ ~~, ~~o _ C~~ ~~ ~~ =o~s~ -- --_~- -, V) ~ _ L ~- m d ~ z ~mL /~,II~/ m ~~ ~` s3~d l ~t W d3 ~~ ~ ~~~`~ ~ ~ ~~ Z ~L y8 /Pike O / ~ '-~~ I'~~ YSi~cz~o o' ~ s-` ati ~ i \ ~ <~ o ~~'°' - _ n .-_ z Kw~ r ~ ~ r ~~ ~ ~._ ~~ ~ P~ ~~~ /~ -t - ~ ~. ~ - ~iiv vn r xa. 1~- d ~~ \~ II _ I IYi1N JCll -a i•.:f 1 '1\ :lX; I _ - ~~! / vuN3 n ;a ~ iYUN~,is~> ~, nNr~~ ~~ I >i c3NOL ~ ~.~,-'-~'_ / 596[5170 a '1 NI Sb -'ZH~'9'Q I 9711 w~ ~,I ~5~,[JNY'1 ~ ~\ II ~ ~ io->o co-s[a =LU eeJi ~ 7~ ~~Si 'y'4 o~, '-A~~ -A ~ ` ~"~A xv ~ vi~-, o-ao= idan pe ueiesa oa -i.sni ~ -~' ~i ~'~' 3 ilk NOf ~^~ a 151x Vi~ .ryIV1Nltl~ /~U L0+9/.M i \,~ I ~ \ / XVl < ~_~ ..9 - A J AOtl37 ~ NVOf y 0 ltlj - ~N / I ~-' ~0 .tl `J3dOtld •Lv d JOIAtll ~ ~ ~' /' I ~ 10 A1J3COyd / ,~y ` HOfIN 13 f~ Cf I/~ _ vS „ -Ntl5 ~ ~ Ntli ~ W ~ NtlS -_ NV.. ~ NV~ ~ __v~ ~rlsl m ~---1VS-'--,NbS-rvvS-h S -~ ~-nl~ \~ ~i _ ~ ~ e~s~ia~~a>IOOasn~NOis-' ~ / - _,l 1 LLLL .~ ` \ 0 ~ ( ~ ~ ;~~ w a d - ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ Ar~ ~~ I~)~ i 1 ~_~ o w, ~m ~, n~oo pm mnEG tnl ~~ =oa ~ -~ foam o~a~zW~w ~ ~^ ''~z >- ~a phi ~~°o~ ~~ Oi i1V / _k' ~u 5~~ ~~°¢ ~'dY ~o~~~o~o ~, ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~<~W°~ ° zo ~l~~ ~ °°ai=oho Qzo ~~~~\ jw z~ ~o~ ~oQN'~~~m aa~mw~w 0 z~ c w ~ aa°'o°, kSs ~ ~~ ~ I . '" =// ~ .; .__ °° 3 °,o ~Ee~x ° vw~a~ ~°s w ~ U aN~ t1 ~ MI ,/ .. !% ,¢o °9~¢ -°4, y°z~N°d z»k' z_ >>m ~~ <o~c2.~o po Z~ ~ ~' `i~.i' ~~ ~~ i%c~z a~_° ~ FQ9oof?~ W~~aQOw ': `~° w r ~~° " oo N 0~ D~\~ /% i':~ i%~ a~w r~i5m<YZ<w °' s~c°~° ~ °`~ z (n ~~o~~oz° oo }y~, ~- ~ s;1~,~" / o~h~\ ~, 3`_~owoozarzo~ VI~w~Zmv=~~r m°~" m ~ °mw '~ ~ 4 ~ _.~`; / 'di/ `~~ ~ ~~z2u~i~~ZV}i~~~°O U w0 ~ w ~ 3/l ~` g/~ ~~/` raw' ~jw~~ '_Zw2 pFO a9~mw p~ryy ~U~ ~ O z -~-'~~ ~ // ~/ ~ ~c~~claiY1~~i~~w ~°°ciooc°>NU o ~i °z ~' ~oHNn~no~~ ' <m SnNC^hm<~~N~~~MnH~~M z ~ ~w~ ~ °- w ~z m >°`> o N 5 33333ww3ww3333333w33 Z ~ ~~Zpnc ~(>~ Iwn ~ ~ oooo o'o oo° ~~!! = O € D~aoM^ 6zO°Z wz ccia `~~Pr°~~w ~='os~~~~ c+n ! l 1 \ m W~~cS° t;w ~_!oo. ~ ~;6 ~3w"w ~i>~o zzzzzzzzzmzmzNZZZZZZ ~ 1"vi ! ! ! i! `°~~°R" w°zFm^"' ~°~?rc~ ~uwioo¢~~ _ a~Y? 34 }\ !\ !! \~_ -_ 355 .Zl `_ ~ a o~ ~ L ~n 36291. ! ! ! i ~ ~ .Fy °Htg~O~ ,~ ~ 36200' MP ! ! ! ! p~QP ~~,*°~ \43 m ~ ~ 8 °h ~ ~3» °°=.R-° o_o ~°v~~"' ! 1 V ! 'g3 P~~Aa tP~g.~~ ain w ~~4j c°b' S=~so so°~ Ana ! i l ! `~ ~"~! °°mw o0 ~ 8~oa _e~W a°~s_ ES ~i~wP ! \ ! ! ~~axx ° o ~~ ~__~ s~ ~z~L°~ fr~ ~N~o !!!!! t ~a W ~~ m a <~° \ p"mW ° 'sic o6 °aa -9 !!\ ! \ Om fib) ~ aan:: o .. I ~MFW .' V~=q '- s°~9 9S Ta !\}m^ '(~ N4g~1 m z o ~ x o° $ ~ K o a ° B'~ a 1.- ! ~ 'P 310 ~Ob F•OpF1¢\aP 03 X43 m a ~ a ~$ o. _~Ex - n~°`=~ r! ^ /`5e~, 4~~ y,p 0~6 oG` rz "' mo v~ o o°mO€°yE= __ !\f~~\\ 2T) ` ~~~~~~0 ~~5~6' m'g '¢' y~ ~,,', m~'¢~'W ~~ - dg °e"~.s` - ~~8 ~a \\ \~ \\~ S~ pµDP~°gd N~N21~ o< Qaac^ _° ° FPPR' o3'e `~C;z°Q a 90_ ~~e~=BN wm p \\ ~~®~ pP\~ob~a~39 g °'o°~= I ~'(C° s^'e ~°= e` ~ z ~w i E\ \ \ s- ~P~6.e3 ~. ,~<ar~ ' p~(n~ .u z~~s os.ar X33 r°~d ~ 230 \\ ! ~ °~ m ,Zz ~O.s~ e°Q ~~_= r3oa eoc zo zzO NR5 \6, ~.y \\\ \\ \\\0~~8 oO~ n~ ~_~_u~ ° ° m o~ \\\ o~ aOO-° y m o' P m GJ ern ° ,? e~~oaQyg sg e~E zw~ '~ \ \\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ o,szza ~~~~~ i ~=so~zga='=;oe~>==o ^ !< ~ ; ~o ,~ \\ \\ \~ r ~ Fgr~°°ud~~k a ~N mop ¢mN3~ a~s'==_ ~<°`a r: 5om ~o ~ !~o `°~ y~~9 \\ \ ° pR°Qf~¢~ ~'' ~ omp~mN m1°p _ °'°E}rd°=fr`Sam€o'o=° ¢W 1 ! `M Yno `\ \ `~O Pl~'N~K. 1y0~i941 ¢"`N Ci ~.~w° p_yy o~ '°e° ev,~°c'9 ~o~ "~ ! \ 0 'iny ~0~6. p0. ~ o.BNyYi~~o wN -m aaro8 ° °`a, _ 'QUO ~ I ~' \566• $ ~ g9. w asa za=~~ x- seo=-" ~`s.°o 1`-¢m~~,^ ! z c ~ SP0,6 ao~=a'o,~oM x~ oQg°dF°°o~.aa~g' ~~~ \ °• ~ s°aNz d m r o c6` _rgg ~EoS~,zo o w~oN? !! ``~oW`r ~2°~E ~l ~l ,`° ~~vi ~io~riEa ~w CJ °- ca ° ^ ~~ ,NO~ N~ \$a~ti \ zz ~°a oro i ~ zm w _~.~ \ a !\la x! w~ ltd ~,. W ~f or ~~ 6.31: SotW- zc 2!\!in Sd~ no.\~~HO ~ i m`!! ``! \\ ~a°atm ~ ~ n a x29.52 09 ofa Q.\~~p ~±°. ~ wo~o^ ! \! ! xFd ~(e(N °' E ,~ pUE ~~ ~'~ ai °8,\rK ,z 3~ ¢ ! !1 ! w° S~ t~ n ~_ ~~ 230 6 ~°d ~ ~~A~~ ~!!J~°j\~ 'az b°~ w~°°- !\ !~! !\ o ~i w ^„ '~ 2~2 ` ~~^`° o ~i~.{.y/!\t ! \o a.Naz °°c. •YX^ . ode '~,, ~ ice'/' -di \ w41N o aZ iYt!, !! ~\O OtQ-° -MHO ~ ' ~O OW~°- ~ \O ! ! w~ ~~ w o' ~ ~~ ~S+oa aFZ 5 13\6 ~ a'F G= ~o morn a~~m a~ ~R~ pRN o ~~~~I o z ~ w~~°1O. ^ FPRµs 4b VfP SE~QQ~ yw- ~~Q7f u wsw o zm o~ ~ ^ a~~ HEP ~oN ~. f~~ ww``G`~Vf\`~pE Nyv> L, a ° ~~^oDm ~~° G~ sE° 8° ~~Q\~ 5~ xias _r~~ r~ ~ ~ ~o J °m asp . a a J ! d 3~za ° 1 aLLQ~ < ~ Z.~ x~=E ~ oao oFZ ~ a,o~al ~-~ m 4~z z ~ -- d" zOZO ~/ zs,o ~ METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP NO. 76.11-03-75.00 BEGI]VNINC3 at a point in the center of SalemmCave Spring Road, corner to the land of Charlotte Temple; thence leaving the road, passing through an Iron Pipe at the fence corner, at 19 feet in all S. 53° 43' W. a total distance of 392.4 feet to a paint in the center of a branch; thence up the center of said branch, and leaving the land of Charlotte Temple, N. 50° 24' W. 275 feet; N. S° 57' E. S4 feet; N. 72° 38' W~ 161 feet; N. 24° 00' W, 8S ft. to a point; thence leaving the said branch, and partly along the existing fence line, N, 45° 21` 30" E. a total distance of 678.5 feet to a point in the Salem-Cave Spring Road; thence along said Road, S, 18° 26' 30" E. 515 ft. to an angle point; thence continuing along said Road, S. ,29° 2S' 30" E. 130.55 feet to the place of Beginning; and ROANOKE COUNTY TAX MAP NO. 76.11-03-76.00 BEGTNNTNG at a point on the westerly side of Virginia Highway Route No, 419, said paint being the northeasterly corner of the property of W.L. and Nellie L. C~rifl'ith; thence S, 58° 32' W. 362.00 feet to a point; thence N, 4$° 37' 40" W. 125.09 feet to a point; thence N, S° 57' E. 54 feet to a point; thence N. 72° 38' W. 129.69 feet to a point; thence N. 4S° 21' 30" E. 183.13 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 44° 38' 30" W. 110.00 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 4S° 21' 30" E. 429.52 feet to a concrete highway monument; thence S. 19° 2.3' 20" E. 113.74 feet to a concrete highway monument; thence S. 17° 48' E. 407.08 feet to the place of BEGINNING and being 4.299 acres as shown on survey made for Sam Lionberger, Jr. and Don Peery, dated January 17, 1974, by David Dick & Associates, Engineers & Surveyors, a copy of which is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 995, page 554. Address of 5ub~ect Pra erties: 2400 Block Electric Road 2315 Bridle Lane SW Windsor Hills Magisterial District Roanoke County Tax Map Nas.: 076 1 9-03-76..00-0000 ~.....~....-._. _ 076.11-03-76.00-0(300 Present Zaninp: R3C Medium Density Multi-family Residential wlconditians Pro used Zonin C 1 C Office District wlconditions ~plicant`s Name: James R. Cfzemey Owner: James R. Cheney PROEI`ERS The undersigned ownerlapplicant does hereby proffer the following conditions in conjunction with rezoning application: The properties will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan dated September 4, 2008 titled "Route 419 Offce Complex Prepared for Cherney 1]ev~lopment", prepared by Parker Design Group, subject to thane changes which may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review 2 The office building will be developed in substantial conformity with the Building Elevation Concepts dated August 21, 2008 titled "New facility for Cherney bevelapment", prepared by Interactive Design Group 3. The subject properties shall be used only for those afFice uses permitted in the G1 zoning district, 4. Access to the office building sftall be only from Electric Road. Neither Staneybraok brive nor Bridle Lane shall be used to provide access to the office building, 5 All parking lot lighting shalt be post-top fxtures no mare than twelve (12) feet high with fully concealed fixtures and arranged so glare is not cast onto the adjoining properties. 6. All utilities serving the office building shall be underground. 7. The dumpster shall be serviced between 7:00 a.m and 10:00 p.m 8. The proposed freestanding sign shall be a monument style sign and shalt be designed to generally match the architecture and material of the office building.. Dated this ~ day of ____ ~'~"'~~ ~-- , 2008 Respectfully submitted, James R. Cf, ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Tax Parcels: A76.11-Q3-75.OEa A76.11-a3-76.A0 James R. Gherney TAX MAP NO, OWNER 5 1 ADDRESS ZONING 076.11-03-77.00 JAM Properties, LLC C1G 2415 Electric Road, S,W. Roanoke, 1/Ir Inia 2401 ~ 076.11-03-70.00 Mast Rev. W~ F~ Sullivan R1 Bishop of the Ca#hnlic Diocese of Richmond, Virginia 81'1 Cathedral Place Richmond, Vir inia 20220 076.11-03-70.01 Alvin Lee Ingram R1 Patricia Hart Ingram 2326 Sorrell Lane Rnanake, Vir inia 24018 076.'11-03-71.(10 Alvin Lee Ingrarr~ R1 Pa#ricia Hart Ingram 2326 Sorrell Lane Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 076,11-03-72.Q0 Marion A„ Horne R1 Frieda D~ Horne 2318 Sorrel) Lane Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 076.11-03-73.00 William H. Ferguson, Jr. R1 Jean K~ Ferguson 2310 Sorrell Lane Rnanake, Vir inia 24018 076.07-05-01,00 Jay D. Taylor R1 Hugh A. Taylor 5206 5#oneybroak Drive Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 076.07-04-03.00 Audre E, Whitlow R1 5116 Staneyhraak Drive Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 076,07-04-0200 Paul Clinton Jones R1 Joann J. Janes 5106 S#oneybraak Drive Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 ADJOINING PR©PERTY OWNERS Tax Parcels. a7s.11-a3-75.00 a7fi.11-a3-76.aa James R. Cherrtey 076:07-04-01..00 Leroy F. Bailey Rhonda L. Bailey 5016 Stoneybrook Drive Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 R1 076„07-03-22.OD Member One Federal Credit Union P~ O~ Box 12288 Roanoke, Vir inia 24024 C1 C 076.07-03-23,00 Callie Dalton & Associates, Inc. 2320 Electric Road Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 C1 076.0703-24.00 Burgeon Enterprises, LLC 2350 Electric Rnad Roanoke, Vir inia 24018 C1 076.11-01-17.00 Wentworth Office Partners, LLC 2404 Electric Road Rnannke, Vir inia 24018 C1 a ~~"~ s~daouoo R uawdo ana ~(awa o _ ~ a~~~ uol~enala 6ulpllnq ~ I P U ,o~~,~„~,mo~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ a ~ ~ ~" I~, ~ 'i'i a ~1 ~ Imo,.:- _- _ ~ ~ Yti~ ~ ~`~ it ~ ~ ~'i ® f - ~I ~~ ~ I~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ I o 0 ®® ~ ~ ~ ;~®~~ ~~~~{~~~--'--gyppry I; ~ ~~ ~'I i == ~ ~`. .JJ[ 1III ~ a ~ ~ ~i."_ I' III ~+~_~- ~ ~~~ III ~~ [~ ~® ~ I ~ Imo' ~.. _ ~' [~ ii --~ i,- ~~ ~~ _ ~, ~. ~ ~ ~~ r.~-- ~ ~~ i ~! - ~ 'II ~~`,^ ~ I ~.- ~ - ~, O ~ I~ (~ ~ o ,;: ~> ®®I '~,~ ~ ;~ _ _ i i _ ~I I i ~ ~ ~ ~' '~ II ~ ~~ ~I Ill ~ i ~ -- ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~ ~ ~-' -- - ~ I~ _ ~II ~ _ I 1 '~ ~~_ d ~ I~ Imo! i I~ ~ _, '..-~~ ~ _~ ~ 3 ~ 'a ~ ~ a 3 vlulml.,~~ouvm ~ ~ / ~ ~: ~- y~ ~~~~ ~ nnain ~uawdo~anap ~(auaay~ a E p~~ $ col Nllpal ~~ 9 '~ b fl e o F ~ ._ _. I ~+~ .. ~ ' J •~+ r fkyS~. ~ P~}~ R 'I f }~7~ i~ ~' }~ ] ~ '~, ~ ~ I ~. ~. _ ; = `- . +~ , N M` i• ? '.~ i I -_ i ~ c ~> 3 ~ ~ ~'ii ~I ~~~i~,~ ~'~ 'I" gip- I,~ ~'~ ~~ ~- ~ _ ~~ ii , ~~:, r .~ :t'i ~~ ~~ ~ ` .tier' = `: !: ir,. ~ i 1r. ~Y ~~ :..>~ elulfLln vyouea ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~ ~ ~~~~ £ + z nnain }uauado~anap ~(auaayo ~ +ol Nlinel men C '~ E ~ a ~_' ~1 _. !~ L ~.f ~ _ . f I, ~ ~ _~ I _ M ~~~_-~ ~.. ~~~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ `~ E=~~._ .. '.: a ~` a1 ,o~ .Gb +.~ //=~_ iv. n H~ .._. ` ~/r ~ I n i~ t ~ _ i I., 11 ~I~ ~~ ~I'~ a a~ 1i-1'~ :L fi I ~ .'li ~~~'~I ~~~, ~ ~I~ ~'~~I ~ ~,ii'~ ICS ~ -sd 1. ___ Z o ~~ 5 U ~ f/J N LL LL O / ~ ~, ~ W O 0 0 ~ ~ O ~ of u Q ~ ~ ~ r F LL N ' Q r0' , , C - ~~ .f', W O LL O f0 O C ~ O O O Q LL ~p LL ~ LL m . 5, ~ ~ ` Cf ,9,LL ~ ~ W f~ ~ IL In 1- LL ll F •q~;•; _;;~~ x 9~ - yy~ A~~~ -~~ a ~ 5 + ~ nnain vIUI~N'vHVUVOi ~uauado~anap ~(awayo iv/Nlll~v/xau ~~ 2 ~ 5 ~i s$ 5 li fl a t I~ ~I~~ ~~ I ~ FI• ~~~ ~ `` ~1 I li ° v I~ ~^II~'. "_ // ' . ~ ~~` ~ ~ i'~tl~ 'fr~l - ' ~ ~ t m >~ ~, -~ ~ I~ n ; r _ I ~ ~~ ~' ~i ~ , 11~ _. ~ ~ ~ - ~- - ~'/ lry' _ ~ . IL L T ~ E= ~ •Y j __1 f ' I ~I -. I II '^ v1J I I ~ ~` _..s c ~ ' N > ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~.. I _ i i ~~ ~ I ~ r-~~.n. I !'. f' '. I CV ~, pp 8p $ L- a hs~ ~~pp5~~ ue~d nnain + g nnain ~uawdo~anap ~(awau~ ~~ ~ - ~ m `~ E iq Nlllael xeu 9 ~ 6 i s \ O / ~ ~. ~ ~i~ ~ ~¢ ~~ ~3. ~> __ __ ---- O O ~, , .~ ,. a~ .~ F, ~ ©~ ,~~ `ate ~ e ~ , . ~ ':i m ~ ,~\`' ~ ems. _ I". .~ m ~ ~ - ~ d - - ~ ~ -- ~•_ ~~ y. J ~~~ ,~'.~ ' $~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ u6is + L nnain ~uauado~anap ~(auaaya c O .~ 1 _ N. O~ ~_ w 9 ~ OQ O~ L m y 8 N 1~ C 0 .~ .~ A N3 ~ ~ ~ ~ . s. ,4 ,rY __ --.. i __ ~. ~ I~.J ~ ~~-=~~ i i~~ j, ~~, b~ :.'~~ it il~~l I f ~ I i I'~ i^'~'~ ' ~ ~ i J,~ ~I , - ~ ~,- Y '~~ ~I~~i~ll'~ I' . - ~ ~= ~ ~, ~ .~ ~ ~i,~ ~ ~ i~.~ ~~' it - ~~ ~ ~~~ f~ ~~ o ~,. „~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ r Z r Z Q r Z Q r Z Q r Z Q r Z Q W Z W Z W Z W Z W Z ~ W a~ Oq r r r r W r >Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p Z Z Z Z Z Q Q Q Z W r Z W r Z W r Z W r Z W r / / _ ~ ~s~ w~~ ~ ~ a~~~ _ ~ `~~ ~ ~y6iay 6uip~inq ~ o,o~ea ~uauado~anap ~(auaay~ ,~„II,~~Ma~ ~~ < ~ ~ s ~. ~ a v fl a - oa .~ - 1~ ~~ a~ ~ s °o ~ ~m ; l ' ~ ~ °- , . {~; 'r - O n' a ~~~~ a ; o~ w ,~ 1 ~, - ;,~ O -O `o 0 ~!} • r r N d ~ ~ N N ~ -~ E E .o-A, .a.K a z o 0 o ~}+ (6~mm 1~~',7! _ _ - ~ - r'r 1n~y ~ O a0 { ~ J ~ ~ ~ -:.. O m $ -~ F ~ ` s o o a ~ ~- _ U O ~ ~ A, ~ ~ ~ .~{ --^ 4 ~x r tr r x CD e ° l ~'-~' O~ o s ~ IR*' .gg . ~ 9 m . ii up~~ ~,~ •: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ m a. ii ~n ~ l ll i ~ a Ll~j9 9, ]~, ',~ 1 ~ -~.~ 1 ~ ~ s a n ~~1,1, ~ a n l a s'. ~! I I, ' d! ° 1 ''. ~- ~ it . ~.+ o ~ d -~ E ~ ' t O o ~I 1~ ~ O° j~ i v o ~ o ' ~ ~ ~ O m ~I ~- ~~~ +~;~ol ~ ~ ° ~ 'd'~ ° ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ Ulm f . ~'~ -. m :, ~ - + ~e J ~ 6 rr S j ~,. ! ~ I 7 ( !.r 1 ~:' r + ' ,t , ..'~ti~+''z ~ 'n G S ,!' h~ i i~f r _~~r.~ ~; t JJ~{{FFy ~•~ *. J ":"? '.zl~ . a., ;~ v 4,c+ k ?!`gyp..- ~; • h 'r° 'Y . ?; °Y~ -_ ~ ~ , z .~ a ~~,, W '~ '. S ~fl5 ;, O 5 j` , , 5 4S ~ ;r f :rc9jS O i~` _ f 4! tai . ~~~ ' '< .~~, ,~ , 7-, t Z: k ,~,._ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~i `~ -' y ;, +- '~ '~ 3• ' ~'' r , b 4 1 k ~~. ~' ~,~ * a` ~'' a ~> ~~. y ~~s ~~,t ,I ~ ~"', ~ _ ', ~r! r.4~ t ~~rua~ „~ ~~;~ a_~'. h~ ~~ ~'' ~y ~ ~ w ~ _ , i ~~ ~ f ~"• - `~ ~ t w% r~g,. fed ~ W,~, , ,~;.~r ~~h ~:.. _ .. /~.~ ti `~ ~ ~~, ~, r .~~~' ~~ ,~ ~~ ~- y .. ~ mss, ~'1~/t.+ - /'~:' :r''ei~ 'si is a ~v.~,Y - - ~ ~ r ~,y, ~~ - ',~.:' - ,: r~., i~k~i~y: Ala fir,/.,i,• 1 ~' t ~ - , } ., ~ ~ ,sue ear" f .^, '~. i ~ w 1 C I~ l ` 9 C4 `S ~ ~'~. ::. ~~,~ ~~l~ K'~T ~ s~. :~~ ~ I 1 +fe . ~ ems'. :v. 3, ~ ~: ' ~F/I ~ ~'.y ~' }~1 i fl /° r \ ' ~~ 5 '~ >r .r ' e~~ .. z34~ ~. ~! .r '~a ~ A'~ -~.', i~r~ :~ 9.ya. ~_~/t ,,,1L',. ~a to i !Y %! p z ~i'~ t ~"~~ wf'Fls'" r~0 > ,% vc,~ t r~' ~'~r' ~~~ I ~: ~' ~.; , _~~ „~ ~~"~ r. `~: A ~~ . ~4~' 'Sr ,dr ~. t R'° ': b ,, ~~~l~ ,,:`~~ . ~ ~isl9. ~~°, - _ s; ~ ~ ~ ~~~,ry{g ~~, ~+ ;4` ~.. ~ ~~~~~;~~~ ~~ ,~ ~ a~ r ~ ;`~' ~~4 ~ ~ sue. t w ~ 4 i ~~~ ~ ~(~.v ~ ~K ~.~ ."~.'Va Y. ~Y ti ,• .fir ~r.~1: Wry .~~~(~~ R !'~,AI K ~ I" ~jt~s 1 ~ ~ i4~J r ~, ;~~ R 1 .I ~ ,, ~ Wr - ~ ~ ~' ,nY ~ ti ~~ ~, f~ L CC 5 ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~ A 9 ~ 1 A ~ ~ '~ ' ~ ~ `~ to T ~~ ''~~~ } ~ t ~~ rt ~~ ~ h "'', ~ ~i'W r ~~,' ~ tin yi ~~ ' t ~ :,i,~~ t. > _ ~" . rr , t ~ 1> ~, ~~, ~ ~' ~'F ~ ' .'1~ X11 ~' ~ 4~~ yt" +$ M - h' ~4` ~-, x ~ ;, n ~ . -s t ~_ a e ~ ~ _ ~~,~~ ~f, 'M ~CF 3 Yom. 4 ` ~-. 1~ ~~i .. :~ ~ _. h ~:~, ~~a ~~ Fy ~_~; is A ~ , C~ ~ 3 4 ~. Utz i~i I k ~ ~aq~ - ' ` ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ r , y; s~ t ~ b~ r` ~ i "s y ~ ~~y ~ } i - E a ° - _ . ,, '~`~4 ~ ~ - ~ . ~'~ A _ ~ ~ k ~. ,~q~~.,, ~. ~.~:,- ~ 4 L~111~~ -. • ~ ~ 3 ~~ .~s 1 _'^-~- , _ _ __ ~- j c _ _ J ~ Vii!;- 'w~ ~ 'Z - .. „ 4 . k 4 ~n ? ~i~ ~ _,. -, ~'A ~ tia ~' _'~ ~ ~ ` •1 ~ \ ~ ~ Wyk i - ~. _• -~ ~.:~. ~. R .. d ~ *7 c •~ T '1 4 ~ ` y A t ~~ ~ as .o., - ~ s ~ - - ~, ,µ~_.. ~~ ~~:_~ 7!. ~+~ ~ 4 w ~~'?mod" j~ I M1 ( +~ry M.j~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ,~ +*f 1~ _ ~ , ;~ •i 1t~ v ~ ~j L . 1 ~ `'~, -y ~ i~ .. ':~ ,~, ~ ~" a.. ~~ ~ ;? - ~,~ ° t ~~ ~" c.. ~. .' Fy4 ~~r.- M.TJ _ y'e~~ F f. t ~ j ~~ t y d. 4 ~ Y a .. Y y' ~.~E. ~~ .p 3 y. ~ ~ SY' 3L .. - ~~ ~`y~ ~ ~. ~ ~ _ ~ - .t , _ f, 4 ~ ~ ,.. vim. sass. '~`; t ' ti-- - ~ tti- iT' ~._ Z.. i j ti, ' ~ ~ .: ~ ''y <;: a r '_ ` • e C~ T ?- ~ ; ~ y w~ ~ < _ ,-~ .'~ ~~ at Tip-.~ i ~ ~ t a ye..'k ~, ~ q. y i?;.~ i ~ ; ~ ; yS ha ~ ` ~ ~• Mee ~1. ~. ~: ~. ~~~ 01 Z ~~ ~. ,~-, `K .~~ .k it _* - _ ~ ,~~F .g ., - 11 .yL _~ r ; ~c _i~ ~j~ ~ .. ~ ~~~~ . ~t _ ~ ~ ; e~•~~ ~ ~_r + ~' ~ z` i;.:R is ~ ~ e~ ~;,,.~: °"'T, _~ ` ` t r i ~` { 7. ~ ..~' ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ J'.'N ti ~- ~..;. i•~. I b '.r., fit,' ~ _ .~. ~: r , .. ~ ~ Y , 4 ~, -, ~ ~~ to ,, y ' 4 a t ~ ro , ,,,,,. LL.. + t 4 a _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ 'w _ _ ~ ' ~~' ~ Fa=s h ,~~q,, L 1 ~ W T ~ - .ffia ~e;.~s 3r q ~ k H i 1~ ~ I A" ~ r ~? 'A° a,~ i p I ~ !fl !y vY~•r~ ~ a ~~is v Vq per, ~~ r ~.bfl5 l~~.aF ~ ~ n 1 rr -. f; °e °'~ ~ ~~' `5,~ :' tt~~.t ~h7t~ «.•I~ ~~'6~c Tel ~-+~slQ i` ~~ ~ ~ F ~~ ~. ~ ~'~~~ ~~'~"' 'fi'~ ~.t. q'~~~~.,~ °~ .~~ i t v ~~A,nSy ~r a = 0.tM.: ,, ~ - ~~NIA.~ yl ~ ~ ~" T '~'i ~~ ~ ~ ~'~Y ~.. ~t fGy '`4 q r-~ ''77 0''tt < ~ ~i ~~ nor .. -~ ~.t ~~ysti 1w '~ ~nt a ~~ }~ _~ £ ~ ~~ s n~. y.~ F Z ~4j~4it 4 ~-. ~r ~~ ~ r ° 4.. ~ ~ ~ . ; ~ ~ y ~ N ~' M1~ ~ ~ . ~ k ~V ~ '~ ~-vim 4 y ~ LL 1 A iV ~ ~. ~4y' ,. ~ _ 1 ,~ h n ~ ac .r ..3!. F . ~' -0~ ~ t' : ,A: ~~ i ~ N. ~ I +~ J ~~ ' t t Su y i . b 'k y~ Y jb `~ L '1 .. - tl . rJ ~~a ~ ~ g 1 _ \j •~i_ ;~ • e. s 4 _ ~ : ~ ti . h'.' 4 . .~ ~ ~ ~ J'~ Y f j . '.< ; ' V art .. a ~ ~. ~C ! ~ ~ , ` ~ . ~. ; y !:1 ~ 1~ _ ,K~L l ~' U1~ ~r iy Y ~ ~ Y.' C •~f~l,~ ~ ~.y j ~ ~ i ~ ti r `~ ~ M1 Lv ` 4 '~f l ~'K~ tl ~ ~ g'.~ .i . A,'V!~ yam 1` .y'(`` V t '' ~ ,~ ~'~ ~.. 7 ~ , ;~ .mil , ~)4 ~ ,/4 A ~~'a'' c *''~'',„ W, PP.~p + ~ •~ a~r , ' ~ '~~ ~:' '4 , ~ ~ iW.i v u iy 'Y R r 4 hF' ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 0 .. ~ .. ~~ ~ l e ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ , 1~ h ~1~ L 1 ~ ~ ~'., yy f~ ~ ~ t ; a N 4 y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ; k 1 , 1..t: Y ,~. •~ ` ~ p ~\11 i ~ ~ ~, ~ wWy ~ R ~a ~ `` ~ ` ~ . , ~ r ~~ ,. -~ ~ -~ by "'I ~ l~~h "'/ j t-~~~){•~1,_ !'K .. - ~T ...La ~~'M"'F: J0..: ' y~'.1 \oR±1 I: 1 _ \ ~ ~iI ,/ ~ t; X ~. r i ~ s ~ , '- ~d - ., ~c~ JAMES Pte. ~l.i~~EPtiNEX 2550 Pz,;rrraS Cr~a~~x~ P~ar~xw~~ Wrrrsmo~wS~.r~r.,na, Nox~~z~ C~r~oz~r~r~ 2712'T (336) 3~i2-300 August 7, 2008 Dear Neighbor, You may be aware that, a little aver two yeas°s ago, I filed and later withdrew an application to rezone 4.75 acres I own on Route 419. This acreage is located near the intersection of Stoneybrook Drive and Bridal Larne. I sought to amend the zoning conditions an the property in order to allow a mixed townhome/condominium residential development. Since 2006 I have been working an alternate development plans far the property. I am very excited about a passible development of-the site which would require that it be rezoned fiaarza a residential district to an office district, But, before I decide whether ar not to request such a rezoning, I would like to discuss my ideas with you and get the benefit of input from neighbors. If your schedule allows, please ,join me at the road Shepherd Lutheran Ghwch (18$7 Electric Road) an Thursday night, August 21 at 7:00 p.rn in the Church's feilawship hall. I would like try present to you and other neighbors an approach to developing the site which, I believe, addresses the concerns and complaints which were raised during the 2005 rezoning. I hope to see you an August 21. .II~f~ ~`'t~l~ ~,., ~~';~t; ~~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 3071 SALEM, VA 24153-0560 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER October 17, zoos Ms. Becky Meador Roanoke County Planning Department P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Faxed 540-772-2108 RE: Rezoning - R-3C to C-1C Mr. James R. Cherney - Cherney Development Proposed Land Use Commercial / Offce Building Route 419 -Electric Road Dear Ms. Meador: We have reviewed the above mentioned rezoning request and offer the following comments: 1. The proposed rezoning will increase the potential traffic generated from the site. 2. With the change in use, the VDOT Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways should be adhered to where applicable. This would include meeting minimum sight distance requirements. 3. The current pasted speed limit along Electric Road adjacent to the site is 45 mph. The minimum required intersection sight distance is 500 feet. The proposed access will be right-in/right-out only. The sight distance from the proposed entrance does not appear to be adequate looking to the le$. Sight distance should be field verified and nneasures taken to ensure the required sight distance is obtainable. 4. Aright turn lane warrant analysis may be requested by the Department during the site plan review stage. This will depend upon but is not limited to the projected traffic generated by the site, the existing traffic on Electric Road, and the accident history adjacent to the site. 5. Upon review and approval of site plans, a land use permit will be required far work within VDOT right-of way. Information regarding any changes to the existing drainage system should also be included for review. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Ms. Becky Meador October 17, 208 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank yau. Sincerely, LC , ` v~J312 Scott A. Woodrum, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT, Salem Residency ARTICLE III. DISTRICT RLG[JLATIf~NS I'a~e I of 3 SEC. 30-45. R-~ MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-45-1. Purpose, (A) The purpose of the R-3, medium density multi-family residential district is to provide areas in the county within the urban service area where existing middle-high density residential development {six (6) to twelve (12) units per acre} has been established and Sand areas which generally appear to be appropriate for such development. This district is intended to coincide with the development and transition land use categories contained in the comprehensive plan. They are designated based an access to major streets, sewer and water, and schaals with suitable capacity to accommodate development at the stated density, and where parcel sizes allow far well-planned residential develapment. The areas designated in this district are also intended to serve as a buffer between less intensive residential areas and more intensive office, commercial and industrial areas and districts. A variety of housing densities and styles is encn~araged in order to permit a diversity and flexibility in design and layout. Additional standards are established to provide far ameni#ies in higher density developments.. (Ord. Na Q42799-11, § 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. Nn. CI422Q8-16, § 1, 4-22-A8} Sec. 3C1-4;i-2. Permitted Uses. {A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modit•ied or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, fnr those specific uses 1. Residential Uses Accessary Apartment '~ Horne Occupation, Type Manufactured Name Manufactured Home, l=mergency '" Multi-family Dwelling Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zern Ent Line Option ~ *) Single Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *) Townha~ase * Twa Family Dwelling 2. Civic Uses Community Recreation'" Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility '" Public Parks and Recreational Areas'` Religious Assembly I~tfip:Illibrary4.tnt~nicade.camldelauit/DacView/12222/I /I ?Q/I ~.3 10/27120Q8 ARTICLE III. DISTRI(~T RLGUI.ATIC3NS Page 2 oC 3 Utility Services, Miner 3 Commercial Uses Boarding House 4 Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower {B} The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-99 An asterisk (*} indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1 Resic~entia! Uses Home BeautylBarber Salon 2 Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Cemetery Crisis Center Cultural Services Day Care Center"" Educational Facilities, PrimarylSecondary '` Safety Services Utility Services, Major ~' 3 Indusfrial Uses Landfill, Rubble 4. Miscellaneous Uses O~~tdoor Gatherings (Ord. No 62293-12, § 9, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 824-93; Ord No. 6279510, 6-27-95; Ord. No. [34279919, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. Na. 042500-9, § il, 4-25-00; Ord, Na. 042208-96, § 1, 4-22-08} Sec. 30-45-3. Site ©evelopment Regulations, General Standards For additional, modified, or mare stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. {A}Minimum lof requirements. 1 All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 6.75 acre (32,670 square feet}. b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2 Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 2(3,0[3[) square feet, ta. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. llttp:I/Ii1}rary~.mt~nicocle.com/defar~iUDor,Vie~v1l 2222/1 /] 201123 10/27/2008 ARTICLE III.. DISTRICT REGL)L.ATInNS Page 3 of 3 3 All lots served by bath public sewer and water. a. Area: 7,2€70 square feet. b. Frontage: 6f} feet on a publicly awned and maintained street. 4 Far minimum lat size and permitted densities far multi-family dwellings and townhouses refer to Article lV, Use and Design Standards, (8)Mirrimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures. 30 feet. b Accessary structures: Behind the front building line, 2. Side yard: a Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessnry structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3 Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet b Accessnry structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on mare than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets, (C}Maximum height of structures: 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: ~45 feet. b. Accessary structures: 15 feet, nr 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures.. (D}Maximum coverage. 1 Building coverage; 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent far accessary buildings. 2 Lot coverage: 60 percent of the total lot area. {Ord, No. 62293-12, § 10, ~-22-93) ht~:p://Iihrary4.municnde.cnn~/default/DacView/12222/ l /120112.3 10/27/200$ ARTI(~LE III.. L7ISTRIC'T REC~ULATInNS rage 1 of 3 SEC. 34-53. C-'[ OF'F'ICE DISTRICT. Sec. 3Q-53-1. Purpose. (A) The pr~rpose of the C-1 office district is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient nffine uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county-wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses. Retail uses are permitted, to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred andlor where commercial zoning has been established, ar near existing residential develnpment where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. I-and uses permitted in the C-1 office district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. {Ord. No 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 3U-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance An asterisk {*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article 1V, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1 Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home BeautylBarber Salon * Home Occupation, Type 1 Multi-family ©welling Two-family Dwelling 2 Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, PrimarylSecondary " Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * l~ttp:/Ilibr~ry4.rx~~rnicade,corn/dei~~ilt/i~}acViewll ?2.2211 /I 2QI123 10/27/2008 ARTICLE ill. DISTRICT RLGULATI(3NS Pale 2 of .3 Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office 4 Commercial Uses BUSineSS Support ServlGeS Business or Trade Schools Gar71r1'IUnlCatianS 5ervice5 Personal Services Stadia, Fine Arts Veterinary HaspitallClinic 5 Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radix Tower Parking Facility (B) Tl~e fallowing uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to sec#ian 30-19 An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified ar mare stringent standards as listed in article 1V, use and design standards, far those specific uses. 1, Civic Uses Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2 Office Uses L.abarataries 3 Commercia! Uses Commercial lndaor Sports and Recreation 4. Industrial Uses i..andfill, Rubble 5 Miscellaneous (.lses Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings (Ord. Na. 82493-8, § 2, 8-2493; Ord. No. 042799-11, ~ 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No, 0422t~3-13, § 1, 4-22-03; Ord. Na 042208-16, § 1, 422-08) Sec. 3a-53w3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards, Far additional, modified, or more stringent standards far specific uses, see Article IV, Use and assign Standards I~ttp:/Ilibra>y4.>n~u~icode,cony/dcfault/DocView112222/1/120/123 I Q/2712008 ARTIC'LI_ iII, DISTRICT RL~UL,ATInNS (A}Minimum lot requirements. 1 Lots Served by private well and sewage disposal system; a Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b Frontage. 100 feet on a publicly awned and maintained street. 2.. i.ots served by either public sewer or water, or bath: a. Area: 15,000 Square fee# b. Fron#age: 75 feet an a publicly owned and maintained street. (B}Minimum setback requirements. 1 Front yard: rage 3 of 3 a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2 Side yard: a Principal structures: 10 feet an any one side, with a combined fatal an bath sides of at least 25 feet. b Accessary structures: 10 feet behind the front building line, or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessary structures: 3 feet, 4 Where a lot fronts an more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all Streets. (C)Maximum height of structures 1 Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 ar R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-'1 ar R-2 district is increased two feet far each fact in height aver 45 feet, [n all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessary strictures: 15 feet. (D)Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lat coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. Na 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) http://library4.rrrunicade.corn/defa~.~ltlDocView112222/111201I23 10/2'712008 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE REZONING 4.75 ACRES FROM R-3C, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO C-1C, OFFICE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE PUROSE OF CONSTRUCTING AN OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED BETWEEN THE 2300 BLOCK AND THE 2400 BLOCK OF ELECTRIC ROAD AND 2315 BRIDLE LANE, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NOS. 76.11-3-75 AND 76), UPON THE APPLICATION OF CHERNEY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 11, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 3, 2008; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 4.75 acres, as described herein, and located between the 2300 block and 2400 block of Electric Road and 2315 Bridle Lane (Tax Map Numbers 76.11-3-75 and 76) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-1 C, Office District with Conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Cherney Development. 1 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The properties will be developed insubstantial conformity with the site plan dated September 4, 2008, titled "Route 419 Office Complex Prepared for Cherney Development", prepared by Parker Design Group, subject to those changes which may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. (2) The office building will be developed insubstantial conformity with the Building Elevation Concepts dated August 21, 2008, titled "New Facility for Cherney Development", prepared by Interactive Design Group. (3) The subject properties shall be used only for those office uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district. (4) Access to the office building shall be only from Electric Road. Neither Stoneybrook Drive nor Bridle Lane shall be used to provide access to the office building. (5) All parking lot lighting shall be post-top fixtures no more than twelve (12) feet high with fully concealed fixtures and arranged so glare is not cast onto the adjoining properties. (6) All utilities serving the office building shall be underground. (7) The dumpster shall be serviced between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 2 (8) The proposed freestanding sign shall be a monument style sign and shall be designed to generally match the architecture and material of the office building. (9) A six (6) foot high fence shall be erected with the NW buffer yard adjoining the rear yards of the residential properties fronting on Stoneybrook Drive. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Being 4.75 acres of real estate located at between the 2300 block and 2400 block of Electric Road and 2315 Bridle Lane and further described as Tax Map Nos. 76.11-3- 75 and 76. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 PETITIONER: JJDR Company, LLC CASE NUMBER: 26-11/2008 Board of Supervisors Consent 1St Reading Date: October 28, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 3, 2008 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2"d Reading Date: November 11, 2008 A. REQUEST The petition of JJDR Company, LLC to rezone 1.13 acres from a C-1 C, Office District with Conditions, to a C-2, General Commercial District for the purpose of conducting personal improvement services located at 1919 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Holladay presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker inquired about the area of proposed additions to the freestanding sign. Mr. Radford asked the petitioner about removing "Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation" from the proffer statement. Mr. Sidor agreed to this request. D. CONDITIONS 1. The C-2, General Commercial district uses for the site are limited to Personal Improvement Services. All C-1, Office district uses are allowed as permitted in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. Radford made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning petition with the amended proffer removing the reference to Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation. The motion passed 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 11!U5/2C~0~ 1~t:59 FPX 540 725 5956 SPZtaE&gR7HgPEqIC REHRB ~j0~2l002 Address of 5ubiect Property: Tax Map No.: OwneriA lieant's Name 1919 Electric Read Windsor Hills Magisterial District Roanoke County 67.18-01-D1 J~fDR Go LLC--Richard J. 5ldor PROFFERS The undersigned ownerlapplicant does l~erehy proffer the following conditian: 1„ The C~-2, General Commercial district uses for this site are limited to Personal lrriprovement Services. All C-1, Office district uses are allowed as permitted in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. CawnerlApplicant: By: .1J© o-i_~.C-Richard d, Sidor STAFF REPORT Petitioner: JJDR Co LLC- Richard J. Sidor Request: Rezone 1.13 acres from C-1C, Office District with Conditions, to C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, to conduct personal improvement services. Location: 1919 Electric Road Magisterial Windsor Hills District: Proffered The C-2, General Commercial district uses for the site are limited to Conditions: Personal Improvement Services and Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation. All C-1, Office district uses are allowed as permitted in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioner, Richard Sidor, proposes to rezone approximately 1.13 acres from C-1C, Office District with Conditions, to C-2C General Commercial District with Conditions, in order to conduct personal improvement services. The existing site is located at 1919 Electric Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Currently, Mr. Sidor operates a physical therapy office at this location. He is proposing to begin operation of a golf simulator business independent from the medical office use. Mr. Sidor's proposed use is classified as personal improvement services, anon-permitted use in the C-1, Office District. Personal improvement services is a permitted use in C-2, General Commercial District. A rezoning is required at this location in order to begin business operations for the golf simulator. Currently, the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Transition. These areas encourage the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas also generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adj acent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The site, 1919 Electric Road, is zoned C-1C, Office District with Conditions. Richard Sidor currently operates a medical office at this location. Mr. Sidor is proposing a golf simulator business in the same building, but independent from the medical office use.. The golf simulator business, independent from the medical office use, shall be classified as personal improvement services. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a "personal improvement services" as establishments primarily engaged in the provision of informational, instructional, personal improvements and similar services. Typical uses include driving schools, health or physical fitness studios, reducing salons, dance studios, handicraft and hobby instruction." The personal improvement services use is permitted in the C-2 ,General Commercial District. A rezoning from C-1C to C-2C is required at this location in order to begin business operations for the golf simulator. If interior renovations are done by the petitioner, building plans may be required per Roanoke County. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background -Richard Sidor currently operates a physical therapy office at 1919 Electric Road. He is proposing a new golf simulator business at the same location, in the same building. Top~raphy/Ve etg ation -The existing site is flat. There is existing buffer areas and vegetation adjoining the C-1 parcel to the south and southeast, known as Oak Grove Elementary School. No existing vegetation exists adjoining the property to the west. Surrounding Neighborhood -All surrounding properties are zoned C-1, Office District. Oak Grove Elementary School, one of the surrounding properties, is located to the southeast. Roanoke City is located to the north and northeast across Electric Road. The Roanoke City properties are zoned CN, Commercial-Neighborhood District. These properties are known as Sugar Loaf Crossing. The property use is commercial, office, and medical office. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The proposed golf simulator business named, "Golf Around the World" will be located within the same building as the existing physical therapy office, however operated independently from the medical office use. The approximate square footage breakdown is 5000 square feet for the physical therapy office and 1800 square feet for the golf simulator. Individuals would call ahead for appointments to rent time on the golf simulator using their own golf clubs. The golf simulator is a system or device that allows individuals to practice golf swings or play golf in a graphically simulated indoor atmosphere. The proposed business would include a designated hitting room, hitting screen, projector, and viewing area. The simulator works with computer software or a video game console. Individuals would be able to rent the facility and pay based on length of time. Tentative business hours would be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Sunday's. However, the facility would only be open when appointments have been made. No changes to the exterior of the building or site are proposed. This includes the addition or parking or landscaping. Additional signage will be added to the existing freestanding sign. The current sign is approximately 14 feet tall with a sign face of 25 square feet. Access/Traffic Circulation -Access to the site exists as a single entrance from Electric Road. Parking currently exists in the rear and side of the existing building. There are 42 existing parking spaces. In their comments, VDOT staff noted that if site plans are required by Roanoke County, review and approval by the Department may be required. A Land Use Permit will be required for work within VDOT right-of--way. In addition, the proposed rezoning may increase the potential traffic generated from the site. Fire & Rescue/IJtilities -Fire and Rescue comments were as follows, "Please consider building access with parking allowing for Fire and Rescue apparatus." 2 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of the site as Transition. These areas encourage the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas also generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. Land use determinants include locations where limited commercial uses exist and where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. The site is currently zoned G1C. All adjacent parcels are zoned G1. In addition, Oak Grove Shopping Center, zoned C-2C is approximately 330 feet south. The proposed rezoning is generally consistent with the Transition area future land use map from the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The surrounding zoning also supports implementation of the future land use map. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request by Richard Sidor to rezone approximately 1.13 acres from G1C, Office District with Conditions, to C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, in order to conduct personal improvement services. The property is designated as Transition on the 2005 Future Land Use map. The proposed rezoning to C-2C to conduct personal improvement services is generally consistent with uses in this designation. CASE NUMBER: 26-11/2008 PREPARED BY: R. Mahoney HEARING DATES: PC: 11/3/2008 BOS: 11/11/2008 ATTACHMENTS: Signed Proffered Conditions Application Aerial Map Land Use Zoning Map Photo G1, Office District Standards C2, General Commercial District Standards ~~~ ~~ ~.~ ~ } j- ~- ~C.~ l 0 ~, (•c~ ~~ ~~ ~` VV V ~ IIIJJJ`~~ r~ ,,~ 1C.~7HI~b J ~ ~ ~~ County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 {s4a> ~~~-Zags rAx {silo) ??~-~r l sS For Staff Use On[ ~„ ~~ J V C)~i~ ~~ r Y ~ Dttte recciv~;d: Received by: ~ rl App{icatior~ fee: Flacardsissucd; i'ClRZA C3C)S date: ~t~ CuseNumber ,~ •- ~~/aoo~ ...................... ri1,L .,4PPLlCAJVTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) [:l Rezoning ©Special Use ~ Vnri.~nce f! Waiver q Admitristr':ttive Appeal C~ Cartrp Plan {ts.z-Z23z) Review ~ Applicants name/address w/zip •- ~.~T •Phone: J~~'l~~ "' ~~~ ~'"J ~ ~ ~ .a ~~ ~ `~ L~ t-- Wark: t "~~ ~ ~:, ;..~.1,"f~'`1t~ ~~ Cell #: Z~~t~c~1.'~, ~ti~ ~,t-{O~~ FaxNo.: ~.~`_~p~-!•a-.S .S~(~ . ~ C; ©wner's name/address w/zip ~cLY~-e=llz 9 ~. cS~ D~ Phone #: ~ `~U ._ •~Z,j ' Jay '- ~`~ 4~ 4..t~~..~-1?.1tr'l~D. Work: '(CO~1tJt714~t ~~ ~~~1~ FaxNo..~: ~~~`~~~, ,~u1 -~:3 ~,5~~ ..~,~.__ ._.,m.. I'ropetty Location .. ,.. .~ •~•~•• V c: ~~ i 1 7 i l Di ~ t, str ct: t c Magister a 1 'Rod=1:`~14f- ~la ~.y~0~ ~ Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: ~`~` 1$--G~--~(, ©~-' L`~?OO r Existing Zoning: ~""l.. Size of parcel(s): Acres: , [ 1xisting Land Use: ~V~~~t~-u~€k REZQNING, SPECIAi!• USE PER1V11T, [I'AYY.~'R AND CDMP PLAN (15.~~z13z? REY/EI;Y APPl•ICANTS (R/S/ W/CI') Proposed Zoning: G2` .. Proposed Land Use: j ~,r~~j~ Does tl;e parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No 1T NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. L7oes the parcel meet the minimum criteeia for the requested Use Type? Yes Na IT NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVERANIJ~ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEALAPPLICANT,S(Y/fi'/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of'the Roanoke C'aunty Zoning Ordinance in order ta: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of'Interpretatian of'Zaning Map to Is the application complete? Please check ifenclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rusnvicr~ v~,~A r~snvrc;rr v~AA Consultation S 112" x 11" cnnccpt plan _ Applicatiart Metes and bounds description Justi(icatian Wat rand sewer application i hereby certify that I atn either the owner oftlre property th vner's agent or conic of the owner, v r~snv~cr~ v~nA .4pplicatinn fee ('rollers. if applicable A~ljaining property awnera eel purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and wnsent Owner's 5igna;ure 2 JUSTIFtGATtON FflR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN tis.z-zz3z1 REVIEW RI~.QUESTS Applicant ~...~ ~ f l ~ ~~"~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-22.32) review requests to determine the need and ,justification for the change in terEns of public lreatth, safety, and general welfare, Please answer the following questions as thorouglrly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. __ _ _ - __ Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicabl zoning district elassifrcation in the Zoning Ordinance., Y ~ ~ ~ 1 `~~ ,~ c7`i'~~ ~ J~~+ =7~ V~ t ~~ C ~ ~~ r, ( Y.~'V L ~ btu ~. v 4~ r""" ~ ~..~,~ Please explain how the project canfarrns to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. F{ q ^J}. i~ ...~ . C7V~.1 •~ ,~"' "~ I ~f -'~ `U~''" ~`~ ~~rl.Q.~. ~ lUR/lJ l~'^ l.Q~ G~-A.~ J ~ 1~ vY4w ~U l _ Please describe the impact(s) afthe request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the sun•aunding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue c. September 25, 200$ County of Roanoke Department of Camnaunity Development P,O. Box 29$00 Roanoke, V A 2401$ Lncatian: 1919 Electric Rd, Tax map #: 067n1 $~01-O1.Q0-0000 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Dear Department of Corxrmunity Developrr><ent, Please accept the following written narrative outlining the proposed business at the above location per ,your request dated September 19, 200$. Tire pz'aposed business named "Golf Around the World° would have a romputezized golf simulator. Individuals would call ahead for appointments to rent time on the golf simulator and would be able to platy courses such as Pebble Beach or St. Andrews Pram around the wand utilizing their own golf clubs. Individuals would rent time in .30 minute blocks at $20 per 30 minutes. Tentative business hours would be 7 a,m. to 10 p.m, Monday through Saturday and 10 a~m, to S p.m, Sunday. The facility would only actually open when call ahead appointments have been made. Typical sessions army last from .30 minutes to 2 hours depending on whether 1, 2, 3, or 4 individuals would rent the simulator at a tirrre. The business model also calls for the possibility of renting the space to a group for meetings with the maximum number of participants to be determined by the Fire Marshall, The only change to the exterior of the property/building would be the addition of a sign to the vacant area of already existing sign posts, No other changes to the exterior of the building, parking lot or green area are planned. Tn our knowledge nn other facilities of'this type exist in the Roanoke Valley. We envision several benefits to Roanoke area residents including the following: Ability of'older individuals unable to get around nnrrrral golf courses to enjoy the benefits of playing golf indoors without walking on uneven surfaces, up and down hills, and possibly sustaining injury, Ability of all golfers to play golf' in inclement weather. Ability of all golfers to play renowned golf courses such as Pebble Beach or St, Andrews drat they would otherwise be unable to experience. ® As it is attached to a physical therapy practice, the facility would be utilized for golfers wishing to return to the sport who are rehabilitating fronn injury or surgery, ® Because of'the information generated by the computer, individuals axe able to practice snore precisely, receive lessons and club fitting more exact for the individual. If you have need for any additional information please do not hesitate to Gontaet us. Thank you,. Sincerer p ^,, i RiGhar . Sidor I`Eav 07 OS O4.23p RTFE & 1,100]7 RRCFIT"1"CTS 1 [54CI1 04.4-•x982 F'• 4 C~ .11 Ltd ,~ r v ~, .~!) ~" s' s, . a '~~~ - _ ~F' ~~ ^~.~€11~~1 c~`;~ lid ~~::r _•. 7 `~ "'. .,.E_ ,fj.:: ~ {i +y~ tp ti.} • (may d~ ~~ ~ (0 rIn .~ '' w., +pi' fj~~1 G~-f• l~Gr,~(a. C 4~' ~,:s y:, .~ ll , ~;.. fit,, ,;... ~ r7, ? ~ c t ~ ~ _~~.. i 1 ~ ~ t ~.: w ~ " ~ !fls p~. ., ~, • •'' ^• • f r ~ ~~ .. .. ~,~: ~ _ ~< ~€la - Icy;... r• ~ y, rL~. ~ _ A +' ~.,,... j..... ~. '~~~~t/ - ~: - +~.~ ~ J~~{.~. 1..• Ci_ ms's- ~'.,. ~~ ~.1, .. . tt .. ~.~. ~C1 P~iFiJGI~rC~ ,~ a:~1M 617,7` 1.Xl~r, ~r,3~~r cr~~lGff~~l: ~.~:~ 7,fJN 11"!f ~=1~ ~lr:~~ ~~~., ~_. -~~.... .~:~. ~,.._ n'IVrr rJn~r: rJT [ ~=' I" fi. = 5'f~1, r(3 ~ t~G GG,3r~ 1~~, (,~sG 4 ~~.~cc-~ .~ ~ ~ (2t~C>~ ~lT~y' s~_~ ~~ t•~ YrJ 0 r c-~,c~,J ~G l' n (1rl~f ~~~~~-rn~, ~fl, rJ ~,~ ..~~ ,if ~ ~ ~ r~ ~~r ~~.a~~ pltV~'t'1 ~1'E~~ " ~ f ~ ~ ~ r ~.. ...: ' ..,. .. (, `\ t ~, ~;; . . ., ~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~,_ ._ .. _.. ' ~.,~ rp.....~ ~l f.J l ! l r/' U rl ril ~`J it r` 11 ~r E•_ 1, .~ ~ ,,/~/a~ ~j / ~~~~u~~~ ~ ~~,~~~. 1 ~ l gl~~ f_.7- r r w n F.n ~ /fin (J rD! tr l.i !.t "-'. JXf ~-r~`Lt.uJ ~E1(.W+ MOTE: Ail cllmoneSc C~o1~ r4r©und ~"h~ tlJorid i ad Adjacent property owner`s to 1919 Electric Rd. Barons Enterprises-custom hornebuilder Oak Grove Elerneotary School of Rnaroo,~~ ~.,a '°; . a ~,,_~ 7838 pEPARTMENT 01= COMMUNITY ©EVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, AFiNOLD GOVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 01= DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, TAREK MONEIR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, PHILIP 7HOMP50N COUNTY ENGINEER, GEORGE W SIMPSON, III, P E BUILDING COMMIS510NER, .30EL S.. BAKER, GBO Septerr>.ber 19, 2008 Mr. Richard .J. Sidar 1919 EIectric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 I.,®CA'I'I®N: TAX MAP #: NIAGIS'TERIAL DIST: Dear iVlr, Sidar: 1919 Electric Road 067.18-01-O 1 AO-0000 Windsor Hills BUILDING PERMITS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEERING INSPEOT10N5 MAPPING/GIS STQRNiWATER IvIANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATfON Your rezoning application concerning the above rrrentinned property has been received by this office, however additional information is required as part of floe application packet. Please provide the following information by October 3, 2008: 1. All pages of the application packet are required to be signed. Please revise application. 2. Please submit a written narrative outlining the proposed business. This should include hours of operation, fees associated with the use, what is involved, haw Iang a session lasts, any proposed signage, etc. Da any similar uses exist in the Raanake Valley? What is the benefit? Please include any additional ixzfarmation you feel will better describe the proposed use. 3. A 8 '/z" x 11"concept plan. Please see Page 6 of the rezoning application packet for further inforrr~ation. 4. A list of adjoining property owners. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact this office at 540/772-2065, ext 2.3.3. SrncereI ~~~ w ~4 Vim' - 4~/ e ca M. Mahoney, CZO Planner UZoning Enforcement Officer P O. BOX 2980() • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 • PE-IQNE (540) 772-2(180 • 1=AX (54(3} 772-2108 ® Recycled Papar O~ 40ANp~~ ~ .A v "14' a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, ARNOLD COVEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, TAREK MONEIR DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, PHILIP THOMPSON COUNTY ENGINEER, GEORGE W SIMPSON, III, P.E. BUILDING COMMISSIONER, JOEL S. BAKER, CBO August 27, 2008 Mr. Richard J. Sidor 1919 Electric Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RE: Tax Map Number: 67.18-O1-Ol 1919 Electric Road Dear Mr. Sidor: BUILDING PERMITS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS MAPPING/GIS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION I have received your letter dated August 21, 2008, regarding the zoning required for your proposed golf simulator business. Our original discussions included the medical office at this location and the possible addition of a separate business for the golf simulator and the need for a rezoning. I indicated at that time that if the golf simulator was associated with a medically prescribed therapy for the medical office it may be considered an accessory use. The current zoning is C-1, conditional and a medical office is permitted by right at this location. The golf simulator business, independent from the medical office use, shall be classified as personal improvement services, as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Personal improvement services: Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of informational, instructional, personal improvements and similar services. Typical uses include driving schools, health or physical fitness studios, reducing salons, dance studios, handicraft and hobby instruction. The personal improvement services use is permitted in the C-2, General Commercial District. Based on the information in your letter a rezoning to C-2 would be required for this location in order to begin business operations for the golf simulator. Our planning staff will be glad to assist you with the rezoning application process. If I may be of further assistance please feel free to contact me at 540.772.2042. Sincerely, John F. Murphy, CZA Zoning Administrator P.O BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 • PHONE (540) 772-2080 • FAX (540) 772-2108 ®Recycled Paper August 21, 2008 John Murphy, CZA County of Roanoke Zoning Administrator 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Re: zoning for 1919 Electric Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear John, I spoke with Becky Mahoney today about the zoning of my property at 1919 Electric Rd. I informed Becky that the space available in the building will be used for a golf simulator that would require people to call and make an appointment and would not be opened to walk-ins from the public. Becky informed me that she spoke with you and the present C1 designation with an accessory use would be sufficient and no re-zoning would be necessary. Becky suggested that I write you so that I might have in writing that this is accurate and no rezoning would be necessary. Should you need further information from me please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Sincere y, Richard J. Sidon _ Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: JJDR Co LLC Existing Zoning: C1C Proposed Zoning: C2 Tax Map Number: 067.18-01-01.00-0000 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 13 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' Roanoke County Department of Community Development N Applicants Name: JJDR Co LLC Existing Zoning: C1C Proposed Zoning: C2 Tax Map Number: 067.18-01-01.00-0000 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 13 Acres 9 September, 2008 Scale: 1" = 200' ~ f ? f ~ ~ r.. ya~ Y.,~~ I~S~f ~~''Y~ ~~' ~ Y l ~ ~ ~ ~ z .r s ~ ~ ~.: .~ ~ c . ~ 3 s i" '~ ` ~, :~~ 1 if w, t ~ ! r : . Y f~ ~ ~, Y' ~. y' _ ~~ ~ } ..5. ~ r ~ ! J 'Y .~ . f~4 / _- ~. ti _:Jz e ~ ~,-- ~, ~ ~~K -_ arm' ~'~ ! ~~~ i~ . k"1 fi~ L~ 1 ~`' Lf ~1 ~~ -`~ FR .;;!f t i'.. _ '~ys d: a~~~ _ i-:, °~''1 .~ .~ 7 t ~ ~, ~i ti~ ~ i q~ } ~ ~ t~ ~ `j P~ 1 ~~ 11 ~~, ' ~ ~.. ~4 ~ 1 r y .~ ~^ ~ ~ 4 iy i ' ~ ~ ~ t '' _;. W ``' •~, 9 ~ fi ~ ~ '~ . i~ ~ ~ ~ W _ ~~ [ , y '1 ,P _ :1~ ,ply P ` J .~ ~ F ~ {R 'T ~ F ~ l ~ `~~ ' 3b ' a _ , ~ ~ ~ ~ _- r ,,,~ ' ; "t ~`> - {' r ~'~.. EE ~ F ! __ _ ~ c! z? : i.. "y ~~, w`- . ^ ._ ' ~ ~ :~ ARTICLE III, L~ISTRIC`T REGULATIONS Page I of 3 SEC. 3U-53. C-'I OFFICE DISTRICT. Sec. 3Q-53-7. Purpose. {A) The purpose of the G1 office district is to provide far the development of attractive and efficient office uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county-wide needs. The C-1 district allows far varying intensities of affice development as part of either a planned affice complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses. Retail uses are permitted, to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along ar near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred andlor where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 affice district are generally consistenfi with the recommendations set forth in the transition and care land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses, (Ord. Na. Q42208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. {A) The fallowing uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*} indicates additional, modified or mare stringent standards as listed in article lV, use and design standards, for thane specific uses 1. Residential Uses Accessary Apartmen# Home BeautylBarber Salon Home Occupation, Type I Multi-family ©welling Two-family Dwelling " 2, Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care center Educational Facilities, CallegelUniversity Educational Facilities, Primary/secondary'" Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Past Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas'` Safety Services hp;//iibrary4.municode.com/defaultlDocView/12222/1/120/123 1012$12008 ARTICLE III. DISTRIt~T REGULATIONS Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions * General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Business 5uppnrt Services Business or Trade Schools Cornmunicatians Services Personal Services Studia, Fine Arts Veterinary NospitallClinic 5.. Miscellaneous Uses Page 2 n~ 3 Amateur Radia Tnwer Parking Facility * (B} The fallawing uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-~9 An asterisk (*} indicates additional, modified ar mare stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, far these specific uses.. 1, Civic Clses Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Dffice Clses Laboratories 3. Commercial Uses Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation 4. Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble * 5, Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower ~' Outdoor Gatherings (Ord. Nn. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord, No 042799-'t 1, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, § t, 4-22-03; Ord, Na. 042208-16, § '1, 4-22~D8} Sec. 3€I-53-3. Site Development Regulations, General Standards. Fnr additional, modified, nr mnre stringent standards far specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. l~ttp://library4.municacle„cnm/deI'aultlDocVievv/12222/1/T20/123 10/28/2008 ARTICLE III DISTRICT REGULATIONS (A)Minimum int requirements. 1 Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet), b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2.. Lots served by either public sewer ar water, ar both: a. Area: 15,Qfl0 square feet.. b.. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly awned and maintained street. (i3)Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: Page .3 of .3 a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building iine. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line, 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet on any one side, with a combined total on both sides of at least 25 feet. b Accessary structures: 1Q feet behind the front building line, or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3 Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessary structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on mare than one street, front yard setbacks shah apply to ail streets. (C)Maximum heighf of structures. 1 Height limitations. a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjaining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two feet far each foot in height aver 45 feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b, Accessory structures: 15 feet. (©)Maximum coverage, 1. Building coverage; 5Q percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 8D percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93) I~ttp://library4,rri~nicode,con~/de~aultlDacView/12222/1/120/12.3 1012$1200$ ARTICLE III.. DISTRICT R.E,GiJLATIO~s Page l of 5 SEC. 30-54, C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-54-'I, P~~rpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended far general application throughout the county. General commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The C_2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and care land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses, (Qrd. No 0422fl8-16, § 1, 4-22-QS) Sec. 3A-54-2. Permitted Uses, (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to aft other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance, An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article lV, use and design standards, far those specific uses. 1. Residenfiat Uses Accessory Apartment Home BeautylBarber Salon'` Home Qccupa#ion, Type l Multi-l=amity Dwelling Two-Family Dwelling'` 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center educational Facilities, College/University l~ducational Facilities, PrimarylSecandary "` Family Day Care Nome Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Past Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services l~ttp://libraiy4.municode.cornldefault/DocView/12222111120/12.3 1012$12008 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT RECULAT1nNS Utility SeNices, Minor 3 Dffice Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural SeNices Antique Shops Automobile ©ealership, New A~~tomobile Repair SeNices, Minor Automobile RentallLeasing Automobile PartslSupply, Retail Bed and Breakfast Boarding House Business Support Services Business ar 3"rade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Cammerciai Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications SeNices Construction Sales and Services "` Consumer Repair Services Funeral SeNices Garden Center'" Gasoline Station Hospital HoteilMatellMotor Lodge Kennel, GDmmerClal Pawn Shop Personal lmpravement SeNices Personal SeNiCeS Restaurant, General Retail Sales Page 2 of S http:l/izbrary4.rraunicacle~com/default/DacViewll2222/1/120/12.3 10/28/2008 ARTICLE III„ DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 3 of 5 Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations * 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower *" Parking Facility (B) The fallowing uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19 An asterisk {*} indicates additional, modified nr more stringent standards as listed in article 1V, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic, Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Adult Business Automobile Dealership, Used * Au#omobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash Commercial lndnor Amusement Convenience Store "' Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental * Manufactured Horne Sales Mini-warehouse Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreations[ Vehicle Sales and Service Restaurant, Drive-in and Fast Fond Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. fndusfrial CJses Custom Manufacturing * Landfill, Rubble * 1~tkp://library4.municode,con~/default/DocView112222/1/120/123 10/28/2808 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 4 of S Transportation Terminal 4 Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings (Ord.. Na. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. Na. 022796-14, § 1, 2-27-96; 042297-14, § 1, 4-22-97; Ord, No. 042799-1 1, § 2, 4-2799; Ord. No 102803-15, § 2, 10-28-03; Ord.. No. 102505-7, § 2, 10-25-05; Ord. Na, 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 34-54-3. Site ©eve[opment Regulations. Genera! Standards. Far additional, modified, ar more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article 1V, Use and Design Standards. (A)Minimum !of requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre {43,560 square feet), b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a Area: 15,000 square feet b. Frontage: 75 feet an a publicly owned and maintained street. (B)Minimum setback requirements.. 1 Front yard: a, Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principe! structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet, 4 Where a lot fronts an more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets . (C)Maximum height of structures. 1 Height limitations: a.. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each req~~ired side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 ar R-2 district is increased two feet for each fact in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures. actual height of principal structure, (D)Maximum coverage, I~ttp:/llibrary4.municode,cam/default/DacView/12222/I/120/12.3 1 Q/28/200$ ARTICLE ID.. DISTRICT REGULATtON~ 1 Buiiding coverage: 50 percent of the total iat area. 2. Lat coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. Na. 62293-12, § 10, ~-22-93) Page 5 of 5 http://library~.znunicade..cam/defaultlDacView/I2222/III20/I2.3 10/28/200$ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF "fHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE REZONING 1.13 ACRES FROM C-1 C, OFFICE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS, TO C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, FOR THE PUROSE OF CONDUCTING A PERSONAL IMPROVEMENT SERVICES LOCATED AT 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 67.18-1-1 ), UPON "fHE APPLICATION OF JJDR COMPANY, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 11, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 3, 2008; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 1.13 acres, as described herein, and located at 1919 Electric Road (Tax Map Number 67.18-1-1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1 C, Office District with conditions, to the zoning classi~Fication of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of JJDR Company, LLC. 3. -that the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1 (1) The C-2, General Commercial District uses for the site are limited to Personal Improvement Services. All C-1, Office District uses are allowed as permitted in the Roanoke County zoning ordinance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Being 1.13 acres of real estate located at 1919 Electric Road and further described as Tax Map No. 67.18-1-1. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 11, 2008 AGENDA I"fEM: Second reading of an ordinance amending Section 30-22-1, Civil Penalties, and Section 30-91-2, General Regulations for Parking, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning APPROVED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr. County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMA"PION: The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance allows for the assessment of civil penalties for violations to the ordinance. Section 30-22-1 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the assessment of civil penalties for violations regarding signs. By amending the zoning ordinance, it would increase the flexibility the County would have in enforcing the parking of recreational and commercial vehicles, and the use of recreational vehicles for living and business purposes. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance also places certain limits on the parking of recreational vehicles on corner lots. Section 30-91-2 ofthe Zoning Ordinance treats corner lots that front on two streets as having two front yards (each yard that fronts on a street shall be considered a front yard), and that recreational vehicles shall be parked in a side or rear yard behind the front building line. By amending the zoning ordinance, it would increase the flexibility the County would allow in the parking of recreational vehicles on corner lots. On April 22, 2008, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution requesting the Planning Commission to consider an amendment to the zoning ordinance to address the issue. The Planning Commission reported to the Board of Supervisors that it would not recommend a change to this provision of the ordinance. On September 9, 2008, the Board of Supervisors initiated an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow for the parking of boats within the front and side yard setbacks of corner lots. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments (Attachment A) on November 3, 2008. No citizens spoke on the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission recommended approval (by a vote of 5-0) of the proposed changes to Section 30-21-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, and it recommended denial (by a vote of 4-1) of the proposed changes to Section 30-91-2. Attachment A includes information on the definition of recreational vehicle (which includes boats and trailers), and Sections 30-100-7, Corner and Double Frontage Lots, Orientation of Yards, and 30-100-8, Establishment of Sight Triangles, which are referenced in the proposed amendments. Also attached are two diagrams which show the existing and proposed treatment of corner lots. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: Adopt the second reading of an ordinance amending 30-22-1 (Civil Penalties) and Section 30-91-2 (General Regulations for Parking) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2. Adopt the second reading of an ordinance amending 30-22-1 (Civil Penalties) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (Planning Commission Recommendation). 3. Take no action at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Alternative 2. a DRAFT - 10/07/08 ATTACHMENT A PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Sec. 30-22-1. Civil Penalties. (A) Violation of the following scheduled provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed an infraction and shall be punishable by a civil penalty of two hundred dollars ($200.00) for the initial summons and five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each additional summons. 1. Section 30-93, signs; except for provisions relating to the posting of signs on public property, or public rights-of--way. 2. .Sections 30-91-2(fl)1, Parking of recreational vehicles; 30-91-2(A)2, Parking of commercial vehicles; and 30-91-2(B), Recreational vehicles not allowed for living or business purposes. 3. (RESERVED). Sec. 30-91-2. General Regulations for Parking. (A) In the AR district and in all Residential districts: 1. Except for vehicles parked within multi-family developments all recreational vehicles, ~t~~ shall be parked ' behind the front building line, unless space is provided in a completely enclosed garage or other building. For the purposes of this section only, a corner lot that fronts on two (2) streets shall have only one front building line in accordance with Sec. 30-100-7. In the case of a unique house configuration the Zoning Administrator shall determine the parking location for the recreational vehicle, based on having no interference on sight distance in accordance with Sec. 30-100-8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Definition of Recreational Vehicle: Recreational vehicle: A vehicle which can be towed, hauled or driven, designed and used as temporary living accommodations for recreational, camping or travel uses only. Recreational vehicles shall include travel trailers, pick-up campers, motor homes, tent trailers or similar devices used for temporary mobile housing and shall also include boats. Sec. 30-100-7. Corner and Double Frontage Lots, Orientation of Yards. (A) On corner and double frontage lots, the front shall be determined by the administrator. A rear yard shall always be opposite a front yard. DRAFT - 10/OT/08 ATTACHIIRENT A Sec. 30-100-8. Establishment of Sight Triangles. (A) To promote visibility for pedestrians and the operators of motor vehicles, a clear sight triangle shall be established at the intersecting rights-of--way of any two (2) public streets. The legs of this sight triangle shall be twenty (20) feet in length. They shall begin at the point of intersection of the two (2) street rights-of--way, and shall extend twenty (20) feet along each right-of--way line. The triangle shall be formed by connecting the endpoints of these two (2) lines. (B) Within this sight triangle nothing in excess of three (3) feet in height shall be constructed, placed, or permanently parked. In addition, no vegetative plantings within the triangle shall be allowed to grow to a height of greater than three (3) feet. (C) Nothing in this section shall imply the necessity of removing obstructions within this sight triangle, provided that these obstructions were installed or planted prior to the effective date of this ordinance. Routine trimming of shrubbery violating this height requirement shall be required, if the trimming will not endanger the health of the species. 2 6~, O~ \` ~~ _~ - r~, 39 4 ~, ~ ~ 1 1 .~ ` r i i f ,'/ ~- ~` ~~ t ~, J~ ~~ ~ 7 ~ ~~ /~ ~T -~~ ~~ ,~ r r _. ~~, tJ S~~ ~~ r~ s -~ J J J~ ~ ~ ~I ~,~` ~ ~ ~ i - ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 `~9 yi ,,~ :~` \\` _ a ~ :C~-- ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ ~1 _~' .-~~/ _~ 7 r~ ~ ~ ~ {~ . f • `~~ j°S ~.~ •, ~ BC~.'4T ~ ,. ~ ~ ,~-~i .- '\ / ~ ' ~.~ A ~. () 1 _ ~ ,~ ~i _ -. r -r ~~ ~~ ~ ~a ,~ ,~~~ i J ~ ~. ~ ~ • ~ ..r ... J~ . ~r~ ~ ~ '~ ~ „- s . t~ ~~ -_ ,~ `~ 27.t~3 4~~ ~. ,, ;~ ~_ ~~ ~~ ~T ' 2 7. ~~5 ~ y ~ ` ~Z s y ~~ ~~S }~5~, ~ ~ . (~, Gl~. r i J fF~ ,, -_ 1 ~ ~~ -~ - ~' ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ _ O~ 4ZOANp~~ ~~~ ~ l ,~ ~ ~ - ~4 ~ ~/~ j / ~o L,. ti~ i / l_/ / J ~ i i ~~ l DEP.4iRTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE~I/ELOPMEAlT ~~XIS'TI1 ~+~,~ DATE: 10-27-2~~P8 ~ h l ~ ~ ~ r - c~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ S r 4 '` 9 ~~ -~ ~ t\ 1 .-. ~ ,ti 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ r ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~` `~ 27.03 7 ~ ~ ~ ~, '~ ~, `i /' ~ ~ r ~ +' '_ 1 T~ ~30AT" ~~,. ~., ; f~ ~ ~ '° / ,~ ~ / ~ ~ / '~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ . ~' j~ r ~ o ~ ~~ f ~ ~~ 2 7.3..5 ,' . ~~• ~ ,, J ~ ~ 1' ~~. 7~ ~ ~/J~ ~. ~ r~S2 ~~ + ,~ ~ 1/ I - P ~. r _- ~ o ,r ~`° - ? ~ ~~ r, ~ ~,~ / /? /V/J i ~ i PREPARED BY.• ROANOKECOUNTY ~~~~~~~~~~ 10-27--2008 DEPARTMENT OF CDMMUN'ITYDEVELOPMENT DATE: AT A REGULAR NIEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 30-22-1, CIVIL PENALTIES AND SECTION 30-91-2, GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR PARKING, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on Septerriber 9, 2008, the Board of Supervisors initiated an amendment to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow the parking of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles within the front and side yard setbacks of corner lots; and WHEREAS, the assessment of civil penalties for violations of the parking of recreational vehicles and corrimercial vehicles will provide greater flexibility in the enforcement of these ordinance provisions; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice supports the adoption of these amendments to the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 3, 2008; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2008, and the second reading and public hearing was held on November 11, 2008. NOW, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the following sections of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended to read and provide as follows: 1 Sec. 30-22-1. Civil Penalties. (A) Violation of the following scheduled provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed an infraction and shall be punishable by a civil penalty of two hundred dollars ($200.00) for the initial summons and five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each additional summons. 1. Section 30-93, signs; except for provisions relating to the posting of signs on public property, or public rights-of-way. 2. ;. _CCC°`_'~^;. Sections 30-91-2(A)1, Parking of recreational vehicles; 30-91- 2(A)2, Parking of commercial vehicles; and 30-91-2(B), Recreational vehicles not allowed for living or business purposes. 3. (RESERVED). Sec. 30-91-2. General Regulations for Parking. (A) In the AR district and in all Residential districts: 1. Except for vehicles parked within multi-family developments all recreational vehicles, shall be parked ' behind the front building line, unless space is provided in a completely enclosed garage or other building. For the purposes of this section only, a corner lot that fronts on two (2) streets shall have only one front building line in accordance with Sec. 30-100-7. In the case of a unique house configuration the Zoning Administrator shall determine the parking location for the recreational vehicle, based on having no interference on sight distance in accordance with Sec. 30-100-8. 2. That thus ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its adoption.