HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/24/2009 - Regular
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
March 24, 2009
NOTE: The evening session will start at 5:30 p.m.
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for March 24, 2009. Regular meetings are
held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are
held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule
will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Our meetings are
now closed-captioned, so it is important that anyone addressing the Board speak
directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or
special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should
contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
Reverend Dr. Stephen C. Hundley
Roanoke District Superintendent - United Methodist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of appreciation to Charles W. King, Fire and Rescue Department,
upon his retirement after twenty-eight years of service
D. BRIEFINGS
1
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to adopt a resolution setting the allocation percentage for personal
property tax relief in Roanoke County for the 2009 tax year. (Rebecca E.
Owens, Director of Finance)
F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING
ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not
indicate support for, or judge the merits o~ the requested zoning actions but
satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will
be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.
1. The petition of Wolf Creek, Inc., Circle C Consultants, Inc., Wolf Creek
Homeowners Association, Inc., Front Street Construction, Inc., and Old
Towne Development, LLC to amend the Planned Residential Development
Master Plan for Wolf Creek, which measures 38.384 acres and includes the
communities of Wolf Run, Wolf Crest, Beech Cove, Richard's Wood, Village
at Stone Creek and Rockbridge, Vinton Magisterial District
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
I. APPOINTMENTS
1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council
2. Library Board (appointed by District)
3. Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RC-
CLEAR) for the ICLEI Program
4. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission
J. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of minutes - December 16, 2008
K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
2
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Reserves
3. Reserve for Board Contingency
4. Accounts Paid - February 2009
5. Analysis of Comparative Schedule of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and
Encumbrances for the month ended February 28, 2009
6. Analysis of Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues and
Encumbrances for the month ended February 28, 2009
7. Proclamations signed by the Chairman and Board
O. CLOSED MEETING
P. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room - 4th floor)
1. Work session for the Budget for Fiscal Year 2009-2010. (Clay Goodman,
County Administrator; Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget)
EVENING SESSION - BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M.
Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES - 5:30 P.M.
1. (POSTPONED FROM DECEMBER 16, 2008) Second reading of an
ordinance upon the petition of Edward Rose Properties, Inc. to rezone
approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to R-
3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions and C-
2C, General Commercial District with Conditions and to rezone approximately
11.2 acres from C-2, General Commercial District, to R-3C, Medium Density
Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions, for the purpose of
constructing a mixed-use development consisting of an apartment complex
and commercial uses located at the 6200 and 6300 blocks of Cove Road and
Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (Philip Thompson, Deputy
Director of Planning)
3
2. (CONTINUED UNTIL APRIL 28, 2009, AT THE REQUEST OF THE
PETITIONER) Second reading of the petition of Foxhall Properties, LLC to
rezone 12.237 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial District, to 1-2CS, High
Intensity Industrial District with Conditions and Special Use Permit, for the
purpose of operating an asphalt plant and construction yard located at 4127
West Main Street, Salem, Catawba Magisterial District. (Paul Mahoney,
County Attorney; Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning)
S. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS - 7:30
P.M.
1. Resolution of congratulations to Glenvar High School Wrestling Team for
winning the State Group A Championship
(a) Certificate of recognition to Jason Ayers for winning the 135-pound
division state championship
T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Richard C. Flora
2. Joseph P. McNamara
3. Charlotte A. Moore
4. Joseph B. "Butch" Church
5. Michael W. Altizer
v. ADJOURNMENT
4
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
L - \
.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF -rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEE-rING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA rrEM:
Resolution of appreciation to Charles W. King, Fire and
Rescue Department, upon his retirement after twenty-eight
years of service
SUBMITTED BY:
Brenda J. Holton
Deputy Clerk to the Board
B. Clayton Goodman, Illlst~lo
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. King retired on February 1,2009, as Operations Battalion Chief after twenty-eight years
of service with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department. He will attend the Board
meeting to accept a resolution of retirement.
Division Chief Joey Stump will attend the meeting to congratulate Mr. King.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF -rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA-rION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2009
RESOLU'-ION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO CHARLES W. KING, FIRE
AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER
TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Charles W. King was employed on October 16, 1980, by the Roanoke
County Fire and Rescue Department, and held the positions of Firefighter, Fire Lieutenant,
Fire Captain, and Training Battalion Chief; and
WHEREAS, Mr. King retired from the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department
on February 1, 2009, as Operations Battalion Chief, after twenty-eight years and four
months of service; and
WHEREAS, Mr. King performed a crucial role in protecting the life and property of
citizens in one of the most hazardous professions, and Roanoke County is very fortunate to
have benefited from his dedication and many years of experience; and
WHEREAS, Mr. King, through his commitment in the field of Heavy and Tactical
Rescue, allowed Roanoke County to be recognized throughout the state as a leader in this
field; and
WHEREAS, Mr. King dedicated himself to ensuring that all responders operated in a
safe manner by emphasizing best practice models through constant instruction of all
members of the Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. King, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been
instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens by his responses to fires and
training of other firefighters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke
County to CHARLES W. KING for more than twenty-eight years of capable, loyal, and
dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and
productive retirement.
2
ACTION NO.
rrEM NO. E - I
AT A REGULAR MEE1-ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT -rHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to adopt a resolution setting the allocation percentage
for personal property tax relief for the 2009 tax year
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
B. Clayton Goodman, III ~l
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~t~~~~-.a \) ~\\~t.O\).J elf 'S.t~ ~CI.O\'(\~""&-b.o~"1\tQ...
BACKGROUND:
The Personal Property Tax Relief Act (PPTRA or the Act) of 1998 established a state-wide
program to provide relief to owners of personal use motor vehicles. The 1998 Act
envisioned a five year phase-in of relief expressed as a percentage of the bill related to the
first $20,000 of personal use vehicle value. Costs soared and the percentage was frozen
at 70% since 2001.
In 2004 and 2005, additional legislation was passed to amend the original Act. This
legislation capped PPTRA at $950 million for all Virginia localities for Tax Years 2006 and
beyond. PPTRA funds are allocated to individual localities based on each government's
pro rata share of Tax Year 2004 payments from the Commonwealth. The County's share
of the $950 million is $12,229,857.
At the December 20,2005 board meeting, ordinance 122005-10 amending the Roanoke
County Code by adding a new Section 21-225 to provide for the implementation of the
2004-2005 changes to the Personal Property Tax Relief Act (pp-rRA) of 1998 was adopted
by the Board of Supervisors.
1
SUMMARY OF INFORMA-rION:
The County uses The PPTRA Allocation Model developed by the State to calculate the
effective reimbursement rate. This model uses historical trends and a five year rolling
average to calculate the effective reimbursement rate. This same methodology for
calculating the rate is used by many of our neighboring localities.
In 2008, County staff used the PPTRA Allocation Model to calculate the effective
reimbursement rate. -rhe rate for the County was 63.470/0 and the Town of Vinton was
61.970AJ. -rhese calculations proved to be very accurate and the amount collected with the
calculation was almost as if the old method of personal property tax collection were in
place.
In 2009, once again County staff computed the effective reimbursement rate based upon
the PPTRA allocation model. The percent~ge is similar to those localities that are ready to
adopt their resolutions. The rate for the County is 60.840/0 and Tl1e Town of Vinton is
59.140AJ.
The Board is required by the State to annually adopt a resolution setting the percentage
reduction in personal property for that year. The attached resolution establishes the
percentage reduction at 60.840/0 for the 2009 tax year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The percentage reduction is calculated to distribute the $12,229,857 block grant allocation
from the State in the manner described above. There will be some timing delays in the
receipt of the State funds, since they are now being received in the following fiscal year
(2009-10), but we will be allowed to accrue these funds back to the 2008-09 year for
accounting purposes so that our budget will be balanced.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staffs of the County Finance Department, Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue, and
Information Technology have reviewed this calculation and recommend adopting the
attached resolution which establishes the percentage reduction for personal property tax
relief at 60.840/0 for Roanoke County for the 2009 tax year.
2
AT A REGLILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS-rRA-rION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24,2009
RESOLU-rION SETTING THE ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE FOR
PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR
TH E 2009 TAX YEAR
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 58.1-3524
(C) (2) and Section 58.1-3912 (E) of the Code of Virginia, as amended by Chapter 1 of
the Acts of Assembly and as set forth in item 503.E (Personal Property Tax Relief
Program or "PPTRA") of Chapter 951 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly and qualifying
vehicle with a taxable situs within the County commencing January 1, 2009, shall
receive personal property tax relief; and,
WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted pursuant to Ordinance 122005-10
adopted by the Board of Supervisors on Decerrlber 20, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED1 BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA1 as follows:
1. That tax relief shall be allocated so as to eliminate personal property taxation
for qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $1,000 or less.
2. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $11001-$20,000 will be eligible
for 60.84010 tax relief.
3. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $20,001 or more shall only
receive 60.840/0 tax relief on the first $20,000 of value; and
4. That all other vehicles which do not meet the definition of "qualifying" (for
example, including but not limited to, business use vehicles, farm use vehicles, motor
homes, etc.) will not be eligible for any form of tax relief under this program.
5. That the percentages applied to the categories of qualifying personal use
vehicles are estimated fully to use all available pp-rRA funds allocated to Roanoke
County by the Commonwealth of Virginia.
6. Supplemental assessments for tax years 2005 and prior shall be deemed
\ non-qualifying' for purposes of state tax relief and the local share due from the
taxpayer shall represent 1000/0 of the assessed personal property tax.
7. That this Resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its
adoption.
2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. -----'E - \
AT A REGULAR MEE1-ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT -rHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN-rER
MEETING DATE: March 24,2009
AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances;
consent agenda
SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson
Deputy Director of Planning
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III~
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
-rhe first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in
the manner of consent agenda items. -rhe adoption of these items does not imply approval
of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the
procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing
and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these
ordinances is scheduled for April 28. 2009.
-rhe titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1. The petition of Wolf Creek, Inc., Circle C Consultants, Inc., Wolf Creek
Homeowners Association, Inc., Front Street Construction, Inc., and Old Towne
Development, LLC to amend the Planned Residential Development Master Plan for
Wolf Creek, which measures 38.384 acres and includes the communities of Wolf
Run, Wolf Crest, Beech Cove, Richard's Wood, Village at Stone Creek and
Rockbridge, Vinton Magisterial District.
Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office.
Page 1 of 2
Sl AFF RECOMMENDA liON:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the
purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 28. 2009.
2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth as Itenl(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote
tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action.
Page 2 of 2
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanolce, VA 24018-0798
(540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
County of Roanol{e
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
ALL APPLICANTS
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
MRezoning 0 Special Use D Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Camp Plan (15.2-2232) Revic,v
Applicants name/address w/zip
Wolf Creek, Inc. c/o Daniel F. Barnes. Esquire
3140 Chaparral Drive, Suite 20Q-C
Roanoke,VA 24018
Phone:
Work:
Cell #:
Fax No.:
540-725-4707
540-772 -0126
Owner's name/address w/zip
Wolf Creekl Inc. cIa Daniel F. Barnesl Esquire
3140 Chaparral Drivel Suite 200-C
Roanoke, VA 24018
Property Location V t
The property-is located at the intersection of Mountain View Road and Wolf Run and Magisterial District: in 0 n
includes the property adjacent to the following roads: Stone Creek Path, Sassafras
Circle, Sweet Bay Circle, Green Knoll Lane, Wolf Crest, Wolf Run, Beech Cove Trail,
and Beech Cove Lane. COlnmunity Planning area: Vi nton
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No. #:
540-725-4707
540-772-0126
Tax Map No.: See attached list of affected
Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 38.384
Existing Zoning: PRO
Existing Land Use: Residential
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMPPLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP)
Proposed Zoning: PRO
Proposed Land Use: Residential
~s the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirelnents of the requested district?
Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED F~~
es the parcel meet the Ininimum criteria for the requested Use Type?~ No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0
VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRA TIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA)
Variance/Waiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPl'lED IF ANY OF ''fHESE rrEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
R18AV/CP V/AA R/S/\V/CP V/AA Rl8AV/CP V/AA
~ Consultation Bi 8 1/2" X II" concept plan ~ Application fee
Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable
Justification ~ater Id se\ver application Adjoining property owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the proper r 1e 0\ er's a t or contract purchaser and am acting \vith the knowledge and consent
of the owner.
O\vner's Signature
2
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"R. Mark Corkeryll <rmcorkery@cs.com>
"'Megan Croniselll <mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov>
2/20/2009 11 : 39 AM
RE: Wolf Creek Application Signature Page
I am the contact person for both companies
201 Berkley Rd
Roanoke, VA 24012
540-400-6795
-----0 rig in a I Message-----
From: Megan Cronise [mailto:mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 181 2009 4:22 PM
To: rmcorkery@cs.com
Subject: Wolf Creek Application Signature Page
Good afternoon Mark,
Per our conversation earlier today, I have attached a document with an
example of the language and information we are looking for to add to the
application package. Please also provide the mailing address, phone number
and contact person for both Front Street Construction, Inc. and Old Towne
Development, LLC.
If you would please email me the scanned signature page as soon as you can
and mail me the page with original signatures I can continue to process the
Wolf Creek application.
Please let me know if you should have any questions.
Thank you very much for your help,
Megan
Megan G. Cronise, AICP - Principal Planner
Roanoke County Department of Community Development
(540) 772-2068 x 282
(540) 772-2108 (fax)
mcronise@roanokecountyva.gov
BY~~
Its:~
Wolf Creek, Inc., a Virginia corporation
2
? ~ G~~~____O"~~_~_
Its: f) (:-sLD
~~~~~~.~._.--- - '.=~
Circle c. Consultants1 Inc.
3
Wolf Creek Homeowner's Association, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
BY&~
Its: -p{2E~\
4
Referencing the application filed by Wolf Creek ltlC. by Daniel F. Barnes, Esquire, with tIle
Roanoke County Departlnent of Community Development on Febnlary 6th, 2009, to amend the
Wolf Creek Platmed Residential Development Master Plan, I hereby certify that I am either the
owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the
knowledge and consent of the owner.
Front Street Construction, Inc.
BY~. ~
Its: President
Date
2~ to ..-0,
Old TO\Vl1e Development, LLC
By
~
~-
Date
L'" w '~CJ~
Its: Member
JUSTIFICA liON FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Applicant:
Wolf Creek, Inc.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning) special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232)
review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety,
and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional
space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well
as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning
Ordinance.
Wolf Creek, and its related development communities, was the first Planned Residential Development
to be proposed and constructed within Roanoke County. The acreage of the entire community amounts
to a little more than 38 acres and the development within is a mix of single-family homes, deck homes
and village homes. The various communities within the greater Wolf Creek development (RichardJs
Wood, Beech Cove, Villages at Stone Creek, Rock,bridge and the single-family homes along Wolf Crest
and Wolf Run) are supported and separated by various portions of undisturbed and undeveloped open
space.
The purpose of a Planned Residential Development District (PRO), as set forth at Section 30-47, et.
seq., of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, is to provide for the development of residential
communities that incorporate a variety of housing options. Additionally, the Zoning Ordinance requires
that a PRO include significant areas of open space as Ua means to maintain critical natural and cultural
resources." These two main purposes of a PRD are met by the Wolf Creek development.
This request brought by the developer(s) is to revise and update the Master Plan. Specifically, the
developer seeks to provide a more clear and definite description of the design guidelines for development
of both the residences and the open space within the Wolf Creek community. The updated Master Plan
will more clearly set forth the amenities to be included within the open space. Lastly, this updated Master
Plan will provide a benchmark by which Roanoke County can evaluate any future development or
renovation of the residences therein.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the
Roanoke County Community Plan.
The Vision Statements in Chapter Two of the Roanoke County Community Plan set forth various goals
with respect to development and growth within the County. The Third Vision Statement regarding
Housing called for uopen spacesll to be provided within cluster developments and innovative site design
concepts. The First Vision Statement regarding Growth Management and Planning called for the use of
"open space" as an integral part of communities. The proposed Master Plan for this PRD clarifies the
boundaries and amenities for various open spaces within the Wolf Creek development.
The Future land Use Plan indicates that the property subject to this revised Master Plan shall be
identified as IlDevelopment." Chapter Three of the Community Plan sets forth certain issues regarding
parcels identified as development. Specifically, the objectives for such areas of residential growth include
the encouragement of planned residential communities that protect and incorporate environmental
features and resources within the development. The parcels of land subject to this rezoning are within a
planned residential community. Most importantly, the revised Master Plan ensures that certain
environmental features and resources will be both protected and incorporated within the Wolf Creek
development.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and
the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including
water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
This rezoning will not result in any significant change or impact upon the parcels subject to the
rezoning} the adjoining parcels or the greater neighborhood. Rather} this submission of a revised Master
Plan is focused upon the goal of clarifying the amenities and design guidelines for the greater Wolf Creek
development.
I JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
Applicant
WOLF CREEK, INC.
The of Zoning Appeals isrequired by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance
can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If
additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in halmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as
distinguished frOIn a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property.
3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by
the Board of Supervisors as alnendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent propelties or the character of the district.
4
JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST
Applicant WOLF CREEK, INC.
Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. Reasons for appeal:
2. Evidence supporting claim:
5
I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project Inust be sublnitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, develoPlnent or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to liInit the future
use and developlnent of the property and by so doing, COITect any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pennitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building pennit.
Site plan and building pelmit procedures ensure compliance with State and County develoPlnent regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use pennit, waiver, cOlnlllunity plan (15.2-2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detaillnay vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County Planning Division stafflnay exempt SaIne of the itenls or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
following are considered minimuln:
ALL APPLICANTS
x a. Applicant nalne and nalne of development
Date, scale and north a11.OW
Lot size in acres or square feet and ditnensions
Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc.
The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties
All propelty lines and easements
All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the developlnent
Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
x b.
x c.
x d.
x e.
-
x f.
x g.
2- h.
x 1.
~ j.
Additional infor/nation .requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERJ.ilT APPLICANTS
x k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storn1 drains) and connections at the site
x 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
x m. Topography Inap in a suitable scale and contour intervals
x n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
x o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
-
x p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
-
~ q. Ifproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule
I certify that all items required in the checklist above are conlplete.
t::---"'.
6
LEGAL
Address of Subiect Property:
THE INTERSECTION OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD
AND WOLF RUN
Applicant's Name:
WOLF CREEK, INC~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain parcel of land situate in the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
BEGINNING at corner #1, said point located on the northerly right-of-way
of Virginia Secondary Route #651, said point also being the southeasterly
corner of Lot 1, Section 7, Falling Creek Estates (PB 12, page 170);
thence leaving Route #651 and with Section 7, Falling Creek Estates, N.
14 deg. 411 52" E. 1043.04 feet to corner #2, said point located on the
southerly boundary of Section 3, Falling Creek Estates (PB 9, page 71);
thence continuing with Section 3, Falling Creek Estates, N. 67 deg. 14120"
E. 779.21 feet to corner #3, said point located on the westerly side of
Section 5, Falling Creek Estates (PB 9) page 146); thence continuing with
Section 5, Falling Creek Estates, S. 16 deg. 541 0611 E~ 491.70 feet to
corner #4; thence with the new boundary lines of Lot 6 for the following
three courses comprising the southerly portion of Lot 6, Section 5, Falling
Creek Estates, S. 89 deg. 15' 4611 W. 20.00 feet to corner #5; thence S. 16
deg. 42' 00" E. 224.60 feet to corner #6; thence N. 73 deg. 05' 54" E.
20.00 feet to corner #7, said point located on the original Lot 6 boundary
line; thence continuing with the southerly boundary of Lot 6, S. 16 deg. 54'
06" E. 312.03 feet to corner #8, said point being the northwesterly corner
of Cindy F. Ross property; thence leaving Lot 6 and with Ross S~ 16 deg.
541 0611 E. 514.98 feet to corner #9, said point located on the northerly
right-of-way of Laurel Glen Lane, said point also being the southwesterly
corner of property of Cindy F. Ross (DB 1376, page 943); thence leaving
Ross and with Laurel Glen Lane for the following three courses, S. 66 deg.
28' 05" W. 203.72 feet to corner #10; thence S. 47 deg. 43' 04" W. 29.58
feet to corner #11; thence S. 63 deg. 22' 1 0" W.111.14 feet; thence S. 26
deg. 37' 50" E. 30 feet; thence S. 63 deg. 22' 10" W. 231.88 feet; thence N.
26 deg. 37' 50" W. 30.00 feet to corner #12; thence leaving Laurel Glen
Lane and with Virginia Secondary Route 651 for the following four courses:
thence with a curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle
of 13 deg. 051 55'" a radius of 577.37 feet, a chord of 131.71 feet and
bearing N. 75 deg. 18' 0911 W. to corner #13; thence with a curve to the right
which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 27 degw 18' 49", a radius of
481.01 feet, a chord of 227.14 feet, and bearing N. 68 deg. 11' 43" W. to
corner #14; thence N. 47 deg. 52' 47" W. 362.91 feet to corner #15; thence
N. 49 deg. 26' 32" w. 202.61 feet to corner #1, the place of beginning and
containing 38.384 acres.
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER LIST
Property Location: THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD AND WOLF RUN AND
INCLUDES THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE
FOLLOWING ROADS: STONE CREEK PATH, SASSAFRAS
CIRCLE, SWEET BAY CIRCLE, GREEN KNOLL LANE,
WOLF CREST, WOLF RUN, BEECH COVE
TRAIL AND BEECH COVE LANE.
Applicant: WOLF CREEK, INC
ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
The following is a list of those property owners who own property beside) behind or
across the street from the subject property noted above:
CITY OF ROANOKE
Official Tax Number
Owner's Name and Mailinq Address
050.04-01-52.00-0000
Town of Vinton
311 South Pollard Street
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-01-53.00-0000
William K & Rebecca P. Brown
4227 Denbeigh Circle
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-01-56.00-0000
Harold R. & Diane S. Harless
4045 Falling Creelc Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-01-59.00-0000
Russell B. McCormaclc
4019 Falling Creel( Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-02-01.04-0000
David M. & Caroline F. Forbes
4001 Falling Creelc Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-02-01.03-0000
Walter Lee Cox
3923 Falling Creelc Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-02.01.02-0000
Douglas L. & Colleen R. Sherlc
3917 Falling Creelc Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-02-01.01-0000
Jefferson IC. & Susan G. Teass
3911 Falling Creelc Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-03-78.00-0000
Thomas A. & Vicl(ie C. Callahan
3904 Laurel Glen Lane
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-74.00-0000
William C. & Wanda M. Butler
P.O. Box 100
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-67.00-0000
Charles R. & Sara K. Boxler
5144 Burnt Qualier Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-68.00-0000
Michael M. Kessler
5130 Burnt Qualier Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03 -69.00-0000
Joe J. Hatcher
5120 Burnt Quarter Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-03-70.00-0000
James C. & Betty P. Reynolds
5110 Burnt Quarter Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-71.00-0000
Gary A. & Sandra L. ICesler
4163 Toddsbury Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-03-72.00-0000
ICevin D. & Sally B. Crouch
4149 Toddsbury Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
050.04-02-02.00-0000
Garry Lee & Jo Ann M. Saunders
3918 Blandfield Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-79.00-0000
Gary E. & Sherrie H. Busmlell
3908 Horsepen Mountain Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
050.04-03-82.00-0000
Andrew F. & Carol A. Haas
3938 Horsepen Mountain Drive
Vinton, VA 241 79
AFFECTED PROPERTIES
The following is a list of those parcels of real property which are subject to this rezoning request.
TAX MAP NO.
TAX MAP NO.
TAX MAP NO.
050.04-04-26.00-0000
050.04-04-25.00-0000
050.04-04-24.00-0000
050.04-04-08.00-0000
050.04-03-73.00-0000
050.04-04-09.00-0000
050.04-04-10.00-0000
050.04-04-07.00-0000
050.04-04-06.00-0000
050.04-08-07.00-0000
050.04-08-03.00-0000
050.04-08-08.00-0000
050.04-08-10.00-0000
050.04-03-78.00-0000
050.04-03-11.00-0000
050.04-08~05.00-0000
050.04-08-19.00-0000
050. 04-08-04~ 00-0000
050.04-08-12.00-0000
050.04-08-02.00-0000
050.04-08-13.00-0000
050.04-08-03.00-0000
050.04-08-18.00-0000
050.04-08-14.00-0000
050.04-08-15.00-0000
050.04-08-16.00-0000
050.04-03-73.00-0000
050.04-04-01.00-0000
050~04-09-01.00-0000
050.04-09-02.00-0000
050.04-09-12.00-0000
050.04-09-03.00-0000
050.04-09-05.00-0000
050.04-09-09.00-0000
050.04-09-08.00-0000
050.04-09-07.00-0000
050.04-09-11.00-0000
050.04-03.73.01-0000
050.04-09-13.00-0000
050.04-05-07.00-0000
050.04-05-12.01-0000
050.04-04-35.00-0000
050.04-04.34.00-0000
050.04-04-18.00-0000
050.04-04-19.00-0000
050.04-04-31.00-0000
050.04-04-30.00-0000
050.04-04-29.00-0000
050.04-04.28-00-0000
050.04-04-27.00-0000
050.04-04-32.00-0000
050.04-04-33.00-0000
050.04-04-36.00-0000
050.04-04-37.00-0000
050.04-06-73.06-0000
050.04-06-73.05-0000
050.04-06-73.04-0000
050.04-06-73.03-0000
050.04-04-23.00-0000
050.04-04-22.00-0000
050.04-04-21.00-0000
050.04-04-20.00-0000
050.04-04-11.00-0000
050.04-04-12.00-0000
050.04-04-13.00-0000
050.04-04-15.00-0000
050.04-04-05.00-0000
050.04-08-06.00-0000
050.04-04-04.00-0000
050.04-04-03.00-0000
050.04-04-02.00-0000
050.04-08-01.00-0000
050.04-07 -04.00-0000
050.04-07 -05.00-0000
050.04-07 -06.00-0000
050.04-07-11.00-0000
050.04-07 -09.00-0000
050.04-07 -03.00-0000
050.04-07 -02.00-0000
050.04-07 -01.00-0000
050.04-07 -07.00-0000
050.04-03-74.00-0000
050.04-05-09.00-0000
050.04-05-08.00-0000
050.04-05-1 0.00-0000
050.04-05-07.00-0000
050.04-05-05.00-0000
050.04-05-03.00-0000
050.04-05-02.00-0000
.
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION ApPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanolce County Plal11ling Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the
,Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written cormnents and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then tIle Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessalY reviewillg parties to evaluate
the new or additional information and provide writtell comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to tIle Planning COlnmission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanolce County Planning Commission reserves tIle rigllt to cOlltinue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the C01Ulty
Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation
requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in
malcing a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that rvould
necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written commellts
and/or suggestions to the plannillg staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
WOLF CREEK, INC
Date
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
POTEN.TIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road
network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and
proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver,
or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the
ensuing listl we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County
Transportation Engineering Managerl and/or Virginia Department of Transportation
staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to
be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to
request a traffic study at any time/ as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
. Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi-family residential units, or
Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units
. Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
. Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
. Retail shop/Shopping center
. Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
. Regional public facilities
. Educational/Recreational facilities
. Religious assemblies
. Hotel/Motel
. Golf course
. Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
. Industrial site/Factory
. Day care center
. Bank
. Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
. Development adjacent to/with access onto/within SOO-ft of intersection of a
roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460,
220, 221, 419, etc)
. For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted
traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have
changed significantly
. When required to evaluate access issues
. Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion,
widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr
Road Plan, etc.)
. Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety
problem
. Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic
signal(s)
. Substantial departure from the Community Plan
. Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the
peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or
over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day
A REZONING APPLICATION:
PLANNING AND DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR
I
COUNTY OF ROANO
INIA
ROANOKE COUNTY'S FIRST PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD)
WOLF CREEK, INC.,
OWNER & DEVELOPER
HILL STUDIO, P .C.,
PLANNER & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
JUNE 23, 1995
UPDATED SEPTEMBER 13, 1995
UPDATED SEPTEMBER 29, 1995
UPDATED OCTOBER 17, 1995
UPDATING INCORPORATING ONE-YEAR REVIEW & APPROVALS
DECEMBER 01, 2001
UPDATED FEBRUARY 6, 2009
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
PLANNER AND LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT:
ENGINEER:
DESIGN TEAM ADVISORS:
T
Wolf Creek, Inc.
4346 Starkey Rd., SW
Mr. Steve Musselwhite, Pres.
Hill Studio, PC
20A East Campbell Ave.
Roanoke, VA 24011
540-342-5263
Planning Team: David P. Hill, ASLA
Project Manager, Frank H. Hill, AlA
Kitty Johnson, Melissa Board, Valerie
Birch, AICP, Sandra Gaylord
Lumsden Associates, PC
4664 Brambleton Ave., SW
Roanoke, VA 24014
540-774-4411
Keith Rastorfer, Project Manager
Janet Shield, AICP, Community Planner,
Roanoke County
NPS Blue Ridge Parkway: Gary Johnson,
Chief, Resource Planning & Professional
Services Division
Carlton Abbott and Partners
Carlto.n S. Abbott, FAIA
Will Orr, Park Landscape
Architect for the Blue Ridge Parkway
1
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTI N
WOLF CREEK CONCEPT
Wolf Creek is a 38-acre planned community of residences adjacent to the Blue Ridge
Parkway in Roanoke County, Virginia. The community is proposed as Roanoke County's
first Planned Residential Development (PRO) and will offer an alternative to typical
subdivision developments which can be designed without regard to the surrounding
landscape. Because the design of Wolf Creek is based on a commitment to be a
compatible adjacent use to the Blue Ridge parkway, the design responds by
incorporating the community into the surrounding agricultural and residential land use
patterns.
Vital towns and villages, meadows, fields and farms, and forests compose the cultural
landscape of the western Virginia's Blue Ridge parkway corridor. These four elements
are incorporated into the design of Wolf Creek.
The massing diagram on page 13 illustrates the four land use types at Wolf Creek. Park
lands are the front of the property, and are designed to be meadows visible from the Blue
Ridge Parkway. Much of this land was determined to be critical viewshed of the
Parkway, and the land is proposed to be ultimately conveyed to the homeowners'
association. A second subset of park lands are lands retained by the homeowner's
association. These lands include the loop of trails and amenities located in the lowlands
and floodplain, with tie-ins to the remainder of the neighborhood.
In the center of the land is the village at Stone Creek with consistent street frontage
patterns and landscaped courtyards that will follow in the tradition of nearby towns such
as Fincastle, and design guidelines require timeless construction tradition that can be
found in much older Virginia towns. Wolf Creek's pedestrian scale, consistent street
frontage patterns, trees, wide sidewalks and landscaped courtyards will follow in the
tradition of nearby towns such as Fincastle, and design guidelines require timeless
construction tradition that can be found in much older Virginia towns. This village is
designed as a scene visible to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Virginia highland towns, such as
Meadows of Dan, provided a similar visual experience for the Parkway visitor.
To the south of the Village at Stone Creek is Richard's Wood at the wood's edge and
across the dell is Beech Cove. Out of primary view of the Blue Ridge Parkway, these are
inwardly-focused toward Muse's Dell.
The remainder of the site is divided into 33 single family lots and one lot containing a
stormwater management facility which range in size from ~ to 1 acre. These are sited in
the rear of the field and the woods, in the distant view of the Parkway. They also are
designed to be compatible with adjacent lands uses to the north and west.
2
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
PROJECT LOCATION
Wolf Creek is located in the eastern half of Roanoke County, 65 yards off of the Blue
Ridge Parkway motor road, and % mile north of Virginia Route 24. The property is one
mile east of Vinton, seven miles east of downtown Roanoke and Interstate 581.
The site's slightly rolling topography is typical of Virginia's Shenandoah Valley and has
influenced the form of many Virginia towns. Nearby FincastleJ Lexington} Bedford all
exhibit character based on village patterns which have agricultural foregrounds and are
sit~? on rol~i.~g te~rain.
3
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN PROCESS
Critical to the success of this project is building of consensus toward a solution
acceptable to the National Park Service, Roanoke County, Town of Vinton, and adjacent
land owners. Realizing the importance of consensus-building, the partners of Wolf
Creek, Inc. the project's developer, helped to fund the three day workshop entitled
"Partnership Planning for lands adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway," held January 25-
27, 1995 at the Vinton War Memorial.
This workshop, coordinated by the Coalition for the Blue Ridge Parkway, brought
together people of various disciplines from the Coalition, land owners, Roanoke County
staff and board members, a private-sector planning team, and staff from the Blue Ridge
Parkway. The purpose of the workshop was to create designs and reach consensus on
infrastructure issues that face several proposed developments in the Roanoke Valley
adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway.
The workshop included a series of intense design sessions and presentation/critiques to
the collective audience.
Design Workshop: A series of work sessions and presentations
4
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
The workshop format allowed expertise groups to form. Gary Johnson, Chief of
Resource Planning and Professional Services, and Will Orr, Park Landscape Architect
with the Blue Ridge Parkway, drew an analysis map of the Wolf Creek property, showing the
critical viewsheds and the resources that were most important to protect. This is below.
Two site-specific guidelines emerged that are
important for the property. The lanes can be split
at the entrance, providing quality sense-af-place
with landscaping and signage for residents, while
ameliorating the view of the entrance as seen from
the Parkway. A second objective is to create
"Landscape Protection Zones," or LPZs, along the
rear property lines and along roadways. These
zones utilize the existing tree canopy to partially-
screen development scenes in layers parallel to
the Parkway.
Steve Musselwhite presented the workshop with
his "Report to the Members of the Design
Workshop of Lands Adjacent to the Blue Ridge
Parkway in Roanoke County Virginia" on January
27. This report provided the basis for design
guidelines and planning a community that is both
consistent with the Blue Ridge Parkway guidelines
and employs traditional building practices that are
desirable in home-building today.
Above: Split lanes to minimize visual impact of road.
5
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
Below: Original drawing for the LPZ, later incorporated into Design Guidelines
SENSE OF PLACE
Wolf Creek is located in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley. Agrarian fields, pastures and
meadows; barns, rail fences and stone walls; vital villages and towns - all with the Blue
Ridge and Alleghany mountains in the background - create the Shenandoah Valley's
unique sense of place.
The Slue Ridge Parkway drops into the Valley only briefly over its 470 mile length. As
described by the Parkway's founding landscape architect, Stanley Abbott, "these dips
into valleys provide a few notes of staccato that enhance an otherwise melodious
symphony. Jl
By incorporating the characteristics of the Valley's vernacular landscape into the design
of Wolf Creek, the Valley's sense of place will be preserved and interpretable for visitors.
Architectonic forms in the Valley include those reminiscent of more traditional "old Virginia"
building styles in contrast to the "pioneer" style used on the mountain tops. Although there is
an attempt to be compatible with the Parkway, the Developer looks to Fincastle and
Williamsburg for development comparables, and for examples of sense of place.
6
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
FINCASTLE & WILLIA SBU G
Fincastle and Williamsburg are models
for the home and landscape structure
types of Wolf creek. Their vitality is in
part due to their streetscapes which
create a community oriented,
pedestrian-friendly and highly functional
environment. The major design
elements which contribute to the
success of these towns are 1) the linear
town pattern, 2) the high density of
buildings which create the street's edge,
and 3) the courtyard and park spaces
woven into the residential fabric. The
consistency of details such as gateways,
roof slopes and cornices create a
rhythm, giving each developed area a
unique sense of place.
TIMELESS BUilDING ELEMENTS
These photos depict the character desired for the
homes of Wolf Creek. The village sections, Village at
Stone Creek, Rockbridge, and Beech Cove, may be
the most controlled architecturally, and exhibit these
qualities most thoroughly.
7
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
SITE AND SITUATION
WATER, VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
There are 4.77 acres of the site in the flood plain. These areas are in the two swales on
the property. In addition to its safety hazard, the floodplain lands provide for a diversity of
wildlife. Although these areas of the site have been grazed, the lowlands have the
greatest potential for wetlands habitats. A few specimen sycamore and beech trees are
in the lowlands.
Upland mixed vegetation forest, consisting of oaks, poplar, beech, and mature maple and
Virginia pine covers 20.70 acres of the site. Several large groupings of mountain laurel
indicate the woods have been undisturbed for some time.
Meadow makes up 17.45 acres of the site. There is very little tree coverage in the
meadow except for a few clumps of locust. These may indicate outcroppings which are
difficult to mow and graze.
The Natural Heritage Survey indicates no endangered species are known to exist on the
property.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
There are no documented historic resources on the site. An old farmhouse exists off of
Laurel Glen Lane, including outbuildings and old pump. None of the artifacts are
substantial, and they will be razed as part of construction.
UTILITIES
Both public water and sewer, applied-for through the Town of Vinton, are proposed for
this development. Sewer requires an off site extension, which will cross under the Blue
Ridge Parkway and tie into the existing sewer interceptor at Stonebridge subdivision in
the Town of Vinton. An 8" sewer line is proposed. An 8" water line will supply both
domestic and fire protection needs. This will be placed off of an existing 6" line on Laurel
Glen Road.
Both sewer and water lines will meet the standards of both Town of Vinton and Roanoke
County. A larger set of sewer and water plans will accompany the site plan submittal.
With the completion of the National Park Service environmental assessment, it is predicted
these services can be in place by spring 1996 and will serve the houses as soon as the first
phase is finished construction, summer of 1996.
8
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
The slope a.naI1""Sis gaph5CJlly r~pre$!Cl_U tho!; \~mic.al elew.tion changes on the 38. t~t ~te~ S!o.pe
cafego:ries riUlg~ from o.s%~ S ..lS%j 15.25% lrid 25% UJd up. '!he ItWst bull dRhle land iills between
0-15%. The milp illustra t es. the range of slopes by color with the lightest b!&ng- the fJe..nen arW U1d
the. ~mtst baoog: tm lteepe.st The. majority ofth:. acreage, 27.87 ~cre-$. falls into th!. 5.15% ~H1gc...
J .2-4 We$: faIllnto the Q-5% ruge; 4.1I acres fill into the 15.25'/0 nogt:lnd only 2.93 u:res Wlinta
the 2.5% lI1d over.
t'~",.... ...
f
S LOPt: ANALYSrS
.. \'.
....~
.cDLO..B.
0. s!: c::::J
!.I'~ c:z:J
IS.:lS ~
U;. I.M.1 Vi' __
I
i
SLO?E _~ALYSIS
t-lI-~
~.>-----
WOLF CREEI{
ROANOfCE: CQUNT"f. '\'1RGINIA
9
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
VI EWS
From the site, the most significant views are to the west. The site is generally pitched to the
Above: View from the site: Mill Mountain visible in background.
Above: Most critical view to the site from Blue Ridge Parkway overpass.
west, and over the Blue Ridge Parkway, the knolls of Vinton compose a foreground view,
with downtown Roanoke in the middle ground, surrounded by the mountain bowl west of
Salem. Houses and entrance roads will be oriented to take advantage of this view.
10
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
INDIVIDUAL ITE RE au CES
The Map on the following page shows some rTIore detailed site resources of the Wolf Creek
site. Where engineering does not require changes, large groves of trees, rock outcroppings
and mountain laurel thickets are resources to be preserved, and are visible in the Master
Plan shown on Page 13. The floodplains show land to be left permanently open. With it's
highl visible the existing field is to be as a meadow.
~; j~!~~f?~'~~. ~';'?t
\ - . ., . "
View of Muse's Dell - Specimen Canopy Trees to be preserved, to the extent possible.
.,~ t?~.... :./ . .;.
Rocks to be preserved, to the extent possible, in center of Cul-de-sac.
Where large trees (>24" cal.) are required to be removed by retention and utility needs, 3" to
6" caliper trees will replace them to rapidly replace feeling of the dells.
11
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
,ro,
r..-... "'-..
SITE RESOURCES
lUl.l ,. r.c '- -=- ---.:J
I >lI I~ "i.":
~~
"'-UtA
\~TOLF CREEI(
R(lANOKE COUNTY r VIRGINIA
12
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
LAND USE PLAN
LAND USE
The land use of Wolf Creek will be divided into four categories: 1) Park lands} 2) Village
homes (Village at Stone Creek, Rockbridge and Beech Cove), 3) Deck homes (Richard's
Wood), and 4) Single-Family homes along Wolf Run and Wolf Crest. The park lands are
located on the front of the property and in the floodplain dells. The village homes are in the
center to north center of the property. Deck homes are south of Wolf Run. Single family
homes are located behind the fields and woods on the north and east sides of the property.
~.f"'-"-
.. ,
......r~~
l..AJ{P tlsJr, c,-CFtRA(1E
$~at.;J;.J".AM!t y t..ol'$ ~ 1...Ql Ae
!\::J1- .-t.e
1.7l M;
j..1~ 4.(
(~1 he
13
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
MASTE
LAN
Wolf Creek is designed as a series of neighborhoods responding to site conditions of the
property. The neighborhoods are Village at Stone Creek, Rockbridge, Richard's Wood,
Beech Cove, Wolf Crest and Wolf Run. Each neighborhood is distinguished by housing
type and roadway alignment.
VILLAGE HOME NEIGHBORHOODS
Village at Stone Creek, Rockbridge and Beech Cove are the three village home
neighborhoods. Village homes are named for their distinctive placement in an intimate
arrangement that draws on the land use patterns of European villages and colonial
American development.
Modeled after Williamsburg dwellings, substantial houses (1650 min. sf) of 1 to 2 stories
above grade are placed closely together with large blocks of common open space
adjacent. In the case of colonial precedent, the open spaces were grazing and
farmlands. In the case of Wolf Creek, these lands are dedicated park lands, wildflower
meadows, and creekside walking trails.
Each village home owns a small patio and has at least one reserved outdoor parking
space in a driveway. Most village homes have two-car attached garages. Additional
parking areas are provided for visitors. Common areas between homes are maintained
by the homeowner's association, which also cares for exterior parking, private streets,
sidewalks, and other common areas and park lands.
DECK HOME NEIGHBORHOODS
Richard's Wood is the development's deck home neighborhood. This area is designed to
take advantage of the slopes facing Muse's Dell on the southern property. Deck homes
are designed to maximize the open land in common open space areas. The entire
landscape of the deck home areas is maintained by the Richard's Wood homeowner's
association. A maximum of 15 buildable lots are permitted in Richard's Wood.
SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS
Wolf Run and Wolf Crest end in cul-de-sacs, creating neighborhoods of single-family
houses. Buyers may purchase lots in these areas and build their own houses. A set of
design guidelines enforced by the Architectural Review Committee, will provide
substantial influence and require that design concept and quality is maintained.
14
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
ACCESS
Access to Wolf Run is from Mountain View Road (State Route 651). From Mountain View
Road, a two lane boulevard, Wolf Run, becomes the development's main street along
which turns can be made onto Jenny Lane and Stone Creek Path. Wolf Run then
narrows to two lanes, and Wolf Crest is accessed before Wolf Run ends in a cul-de-sac.
A second entrance to Beech Cove a village home section of the development is off of
Laurel Glen Lane.
To ensure the integrity of the above stated design concept, a set of guidelines will direct
the design and development of the plan. The Wolf Creek Homeowner's Association will
ensure that the guidelines are followed in addition to overseeing maintenance of the
development's amenities.
MARKET TARGET
The mix of housing types, high amenity orientation and preservation of natural resources
is intended to bring a variety of residents to the site. In addition to young families, it is
anticipated that empty nesters and seniors will become site residents.
PARK LAN DS
A 10.11 acre park featuring a wildflower meadow, mowed and landscaped areas, walking
trails and a dry pond (which doubles as a retention area) will provide residents and
visitors of Wolf Creek with the opportunity to enjoy the natural beauty of the Valley. The
meadow is intended to be ultimately conveyed to the hOllleowners' Association.
Maintenance on this parcel will be through the homeowner's association. Trails and a
seating area / gazebo are planned.
A second group of park lands include the streamside trails that lead from the meadow to
Muse's Dell, with a loop trail for exercise and enjoying the scenery. Amenities along this
trail include benches, foot bridges, tree labels, and flower plantings. These trails and park
lands will be semiprivate, in the care of the homeowner's association. An Open Space
Master Plan follows the Wolf Creek Master Plan data on page 16.
15
~..
..r
/
,
I ,,/Cy' l
~ /"., ~
~, ,~
13.' .1.
\ / - 13369' - ,.;
/Ji89.36'20' E . ........................ ~ 2
/ ................ ..' i.i. ><: ~
,.. ...................... i ......i..< ~ 8
ii<iio./.f :!:
$ li>C. .... >;> 1 :
"- <ij "It" ............. ............... .........., ,.';ii
~ ~_ f:! J ... it .........i ......... ................. I
91") l:1::.i; < ......< ...... .,' ~\,
~~ba:i rc';;--"< ..... ".. ...... ... .......i... w
::? 0: "-' (%}"t J <;,j..;..
'j fjj {}::j <;., ...................... 1',.;:f ....... ............... ................ ...... ........0 \
....J !j#... 5 i..... ................. ........;...i ~
, s::::;' r.i.....:.... '2, I
~ ~<. < .. .. .\~ I
I ;;f ............../f ...... ...........f]
!;J "-.:. ...... ........< ........... ........ ...... ....... .." I
!? . ....... ...... .<.< .:......... ...... .>< ...... II '0
i...' ............ '"
k!'. .. ... ......... .....'ii. I
o .................. ....... '.' ......... .....
CJ / ............. ... ........i. ../'\
...... ./. ..,.'.....'., .........,.,.'......f-~
. .'. '...,.....i.ii.fi.;d ..,. ':... ,.,..,..,.<
...,.. ..,..... .....'.',............'.....,......'..... ..,..'...'..... '... ,....,..i..
,.... ..,...,....' i............,.......,'., 'i.i. .....'...'."...,.., ,.,........
...;.....:.... ...".....i.......'.,...:........, ,.',...". ~
.. ,.. .'. ....;....... :.
.,..,.,,' f", ........ ..."....i
...., .....,...,... ',.....
..... ....,.".......... ........
.' ....<.
. ",. ... ~j
Gi;,.... ...." .... .,.
...,
~ ....'. .....:. .:"",~
r<i;' ",..".,.. 2G
..... ,....'.. ..,... ..,....'...... -1"'7
t ".i .......>i -. ..... ......'..'
" ., ... ,....,i.. ....'..'. .,.,.'.
.:. '.'"..., .".,.,.. .'.. . ',' ',.,. ...'.,.'..... ...,. .........
.4.J . .,............ ...,....'.'.. ....,'..,. ....,. ,.... .'...'....,...);.
.~ ,.,<,i.... ......... ..'......, '., ,....'
~.... ...'....;.'.;..<.. '.. .,. .,','. '.:.. ..".. .'...., ,.'.,.,
i. .....,..,. ,... .,. / .,........i. ....;.,..,. ','........
"',.,. .,<.... ..,..,....'...i ....,.'. <..,,' i,il
'., .' '.. , .'.' ... <....... i.'.i. .'...,. ,",., ..,.',.'.'...,...,.", "..'.'.'.."'..'. ',,'.,
..,.<..'" ..',.....'...<.. ...........,.
...............,..... '....,'..i ',',.,'...' ',,',. ,...,.......i... l:o
,..".,..,.,...' ii.. ....,'.' ."':''''.i....i''' ,.,',',. '..........
., .." '.'<.. ,'....'.'.i ..<ii.... .......,;....,.......,... ....."../ .'.
,9IH;r: .....'.....,.,..,......,....if'...... ..ii .....
ill . PP,Elfr.lL N
00 W: zo- II '9f,,,.u -
Wi' XVi
IlnoA'I-IDI~ I-g-~I 9C-qOOC~LO
IS
a I-
(:;: CO;S
0:::.... C!i~~
1? c: ~ n: ~ r:B~
<':>'-"'~ll:: wC
<:~11.t.: 6-.1
5(f)~8~()~~-
?;;~l~ <.:>~
VI to .... 00<:
l-o)~NI-O~:::i
en '<t' ~ ?~:lt" -.I (j R
-_In....n:'<('<(.....
~-~(.? Cl::E~
Lj~~~ ~~c
'<(...(b ~~~
10 (J'j'<(C::
~ ()
t'i
'<(
'.. ..
.......
,
.'. :
~
-.....
1 ~Ctj
::t:~
.'t
~
. ~I=:!
ir
...
.........,.,'
C)
Cl
'"i
"'! Cl
~~
~I~
. -
<::>,.;
!'>""l
!?l~
~><:
v;i::::
b
'"
o
~
~
~I g
.,:
, Cl
"" I
E'l @j
....
p :!:
......
<::>
tn ~
><:
~
IX) 0 b
<:> (';) <D
<:> ;i:
(\j II
,..: 0 ~
O:i
.c
0
(3
0
d
z
Iii :;j ill
...J
I- ::;; ..:
<( 0 0
0 0 VI
<:>
'"
,II
;~8
:J~L!
t.... ,......~
~~~
;?~o
~~:i)
2!~3
a"-@
:r: ...J
0.. <:
::;;:
, ~
I
I
~I~
:!J
<(
&l
--'
:;;:
::;;:
..;
~
w ""
~ ;;
> ;.;
<( <(
6 ;
t;:;~~
55'85
:? ,,' '"
~X~
"'~2
iciC5
'q'n...o::
....
~~
~,~
gj~
E-a-:
-<:C;,
-~
Uo
0>-<<
c:nsez
en p:: _
-<~~
ZC{l-
Cr:l~>:
Clr..J~
C/)~ ~ 0
a~
zo
_J (.il 0:::
OMp'I.I"~ .g.WD c.q.()C'to\'"'\OC~ LO\ toO ~\DDOIM 'iJp\ 1M
~ ~ l!l
~ ~
iil ~;~~~ i
"~!~ ~~~;~ . ~~~
8"~!<~ ~ p};l.,~;/
~hh Ii ~iihl2
aLDvZ VINICl~IA '3~ONVO~
6990Z X08 'O'd
A\S '3nN3AV N0131BWVlIB 1'991'
VINIDBlA '3)!ONVOB
SB3NNVld-SB0A3A BflS-SB33N I DN3
').d 'S3J.,VDOSSV N3GSWOl
,OO~;..~
OSO-v6
-
'3WOS 15
rON '~NOO ~
'3.1'W'0 ~
wo:r:JdN3GSWm@1IVw :1IVW-3
Svv6-GLL (DVS) :XVl
I ~vv-vLL (01'5) :3NOHd
~
~~~'!
~ \~'i.
~ VA,%G>
./ ol"'~
./., \i
>..
h
~ .
~ C,,) ::s
~~~ ~t;~
~~ ~-c.:J
~~ ~ ~
~~~O::: "'CS:::':
~I"\->a~~--J>:
o~r~ ~~
~C,,)'-Iti3~eJ~
0::: f': :::J
f-.. I"""\~O:::V)a
i!j ~ -, [b C,,) C3 (.J
~~~8: ~'""
L.j ~~ ~ e ~
'" .....,-4 ~ <: ~
'" 2l 2S>23
Cl., ~ 0:;
~
~ p ~ i
.,~~,,~~!~!~Si~i~~
~ hUuuilUlii
III I: : ~~~e{l..n +)(o~
~
~
s
/g
"~R
~/:j~
B~:
Oil::!
~
"-
OS
............
s
1,
\.
~
~
l<.....,~r:;:
cd'"
~~~~
~~~'"
::r;~(,)CQ
"'~"-
;::
~ ft
rn
t)
Eil
~ B
~ -
t.ll
ol
i~
~]
. '"
j;l~!;/
S:;f~
!liia;d
"-0:
/
\
ud'unO,.(1lI-(:o)(eOSO~6
OMp'~o)(eogOt 6 ,OUa\090 l'6\ t66~ \ 90UIMII JP\:M
WO::r::ldN30SWnl@1IVW :1IVW~3
5tt6-lLL (Ov5) :XV::l
~ ~ tV-v LL (OV5) :3NOHd
9 Wtl VINlC>lll^ '3>10NVOll
6990l X08 'O'd
MS '3nN3^V N0131SWVli8 v99v
~~N~1l~13t~~J~lif~~~ .
IOO~ = II~
OSO-t6
6002: '9 A8Vm::I83.:1
:3l\fOS
:'ON 'YH'iOO
'31 va
........... ..
\O~~
O<<D
~v;~
5 u.l0
~~
c:4. <.') ct:.,
~o..
~~
cA~
~
N
~ cj ::1
~ ~ ~ ~~.
~ ~ ~ Ct: ~" Ci >
~~af2~~~
:r: U U E3 r~.., eJ N
V) G:: ~ i-= S
~~~~t3l38
~~t;:g: ~~
L.LJa~ ~~~
~~ .. 2 a
~ ~ ~<:2:;
~ ~ a$~
0: ~ ~
~
....
Iii <t:
~ --9
w
~o. :;-
st.Ci\~Slt>.~s
g.rff:~~ ~"". 1\ '" '"
.,,.,0 p.a. g. '" "
\.0\ 6
"0. S.
sf,C\\"iS1t>. \€.S
fQ\.cP.;G cR~, ,1r6
-f~?e. 9.
\.0\ \
<:'l.
'S
/;j
to"i:s~
f:S t::J ::5
:Sft
f:J fS ~'
8i~Q;$
~4.'
tli:.
~
~
~
~
~
13
<.:>
<:
:3
~
/
""""-
")
~
~
~
f'-
~
..
"
~
~
.q-
;
~
~
~
Qbo;
o~~~
4t~~/?o-;y
e, ~
'1?b-- ~
~
o~
,/
~
;('
~ ~
s ~ --....
a::~~ ;":d::gt3~
~~~ ~~~~~
~~~Cl ~t;~g~
~~~ ~~~~~
:Z::~~t5~i::5 "'
~~~~~ ~
~~~~~ ~
~
L5
~
'"
I-
a!
~~
. ~ ~ ~
hJ~~~~c:)
@~~~~~
~t}~~~~
Q:~~a:Q
~
:.:-
~<.!)~
uCl..l'<)
~~~
1tcQNi
~
~
Cl:::
~8~;S
8~~~~
g~~~~
fO~~~~
~
;:g
<
u
r.J)
u
~
p...
<
~
o
~~~~a2 ~
~ t'J ~.~ <0 ti ~
~
~~~!~~
"".i-:<::)C::><o~
R ""
~~~
i:;j ci ':')
~:~
Cla.:
/
\
lld'~lnO^ BI-~OXQ090 \76
6Mp'~OXQ090\76\6ue\OgOv6\ v66~ \S5U!MBJP\:M
<:(
I-
<:(
o
z
<:(
..J
a.
~
w
I-
00
<:(
~
l- >-
W l-
>- 0 0 0 0 0 Z O(f)
I-- :::s :::s :::s :::s :::s 0 :::sz
en ::J ::J :J :J ::J :::s :JW
z 0 0 0 0 0 :J 00
W C0 0 L{) c.o (V") 0 c.oCf)
(j) LOCf)
0 co LO L{) L{) ~ co NO
v CY:
C'0 <.9
W
C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<:( <C <C <C <( <C <C <( <(
W N 0 -r- LO C'0 ~ ~ N
~ ~ 0 f'-... m 0 -r- ~ N
U ~ N N -r- f'-... co 0 co
~ N ~ C0
<(
.W
O...J
zoo
:2E<(CI)
::l01-- co 0 LO -r- C'0 co C'0 co
:iE:::!O N ~ ~ ~ C'0 0) 0)
-..::l..J
Xm
<:(u..
:2:0
w w W ill
en (9 (9 ~ <.9
:::J <( <C 0 <( LL
0 --1 --1 W --1 (f)
--1 .....J 0 --1
:c > > >
0 ~
0 w r-
w (j) (f)
0 0::: W l-
I 0 0::: 0
~ W 0 --1
0 Z 0 LL W
0 0 --1 --1 W
OJ 0 co (9
I- 0 <(
J: (f) w S w S Cf) <(
G <.9 > 0 ~ W
I- if) --1 0::: 0:::
W <( 0 0 Z :J <( 0
0 0 :J
Z w 0:: 0::: e::: ro D- <(
<.9 en <( I --1 --1 --1
::J ~ U LL ~ ~ ~
0 I --1
0 W 0
-1 0 W 0 0 0
> 0::: 0::: co S l- I-- l-
<C
i2
w
I-
-
0::
o
Z
C)
-
tn
W
C
:J
<{
u
l=
0::
~ N N N N N
Z
~
a.
0
0
0
....I
u..
Z
0
~
~ m b b b ~
w
en c: "l""" "l""" "l""" I::
W
0::
~
U
::J
~
0
en ~ m b b b
.:x: - LO
() ~ I:: "l""" "l""" "l""" N
m
.g
Q) 0::
en
E 0
:::J ~ ~ m ~ ~ b
E -
:5 w I:: I:: I:: I:: "l"""
0
:E ii5
0
~ ~ b b 0 0
!z I:: "l""" "l""" "l""" (\')
0
0::
u..
~
Q) 1ii
~ ~
t) u
Q) "8 ....
C ~
0 0
Q) - ~
> Q) en
0 Ol - .VI C
W t) -c ro
a. 'C "E :J
.c .c Q) 0::
?: lrl ~ Ol ro ....
g ~ .c ~
W 0
Q) 5 0::
(/) CD 0::
::J
0
J:
>-
-l
~
<(
w u.
<9 w
~ ~ -l
t) C>
-l W Z
:> 0 Ci5
0:: <( <(
w 0 -c
Z 0 0
~ :x: :x: 0
Q) Q) ~<(
> Ol ~ ~
::.c: 0 -c .VI 0
....I t)
~ 'C "E:r:
.c .c ro
lrl ~ .c
g 0
0 Q) 0::
en CD 0::
E E E
....I Q) Q) Q)
<{ -~ -~ -~
0: ~ro ~ro ~<<l
~a. ~a. ~a.
~ gtj O~ O~
co co
O'C O'C O'C
t)CD t)CD ro t)m <<l
::.c: -cO) ~~ C ~~ C
....I Q)C
~ E~ E~ E~
0 c7J 'E c7J 'E c7J 'E
en 0) 0) Q)
J: J: J:
::.c:
....I
~~ M M ~ M ~
C
o~
ii5
en
.:x:
(ij
3: .;,t: <(
Q) Q)
"0 <( <( ~ 0
Ci5 0:: 0 0 t) :x:
w J: J: Q) ~
Z
"0 ~ Q) Q) C<( l-
I:: > Ol .90 0
m 0 -c
0 U 'C ~J: VI 0
en ~ .c .c ro ~ >
"0 M g Q)
m ro
0 0:: Ol .c
0:: m 0:: ~ 0
5 0::
~
0 I-
~ b b b Co 0
Cl N N N ~ 0
<{ >
0
0::
.;,t:
Q) -
~ VI
Q)
U ~
U
Q) 8 ....
C (5
Q) .9 ~ ?;
> Q) en
0 Ol - VI C
t) -c ro ~ :J
W 'C
.c .c Q) a::
a. Ol ro
?: 0 .;,t: .c ....
:B g ~ 0 ~
0 CD 0:: 5 0::
<{
0
0:: >-
-I
:E
w it
C> w
~ -l
~ t) <9
-l W Z
:> 0 U5
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
D SIGN GUIDELINES
I.
Outline Statement
Objective
The Association
Membership Levels
Design Guidelines
II. Circulation
Principles Guiding Circulation
Wolf Run - Entrance Area
Wolf Run and Wolf Crest
Village Streets
Deck Home Streets and Parking
III. Wolf Creek Design Guidelines
Village and Deck Homes
Single Family Homes
Setback and the Landscape Protection Zone
IV. Landscape Guidelines
Village
Deck home
Single Family
Hardscape Palette
Plant Palette
V. [Villages at Stone Creek and Rockbridge]
[TBD]
20
21
22
23
27
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN GUIDELINES OUTLiNE TATEMENT
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTI N
Obiective
The objective of this project is to create a planned residential community that maximizes
site resources and is visually compatible with the adjacent Blue Ridge Parkway. By using
tile local context of village, meadow and forest as the theme for the community's design;
following environmentally sensitive development policies; and interpreting traditional town
planning principles in innovative ways to meet the needs of today, Wolf Creek will
provide a quality home atmosphere and beautiful setting for new development.
Association
All property owners at Wolf Creek are automatically metllbers of Wolf Creek
Homeowners Association, Inc. The members elect the Architectural Committee to
resolve design and maintenance issues. Each year the committee can be composed of
different members except for the master developer, who will be a member with majority
voting power until the last lot is sold. The master developer may appoint another member
in his place if he so chooses. The committee's primary function will be to review design
proposals. Other responsibilities will include assessing annual dues for maintenance and
upkeep of the property, determining the maintenance and capital improvement budget,
and deciding community capital improvement and maintenance projects.
Membership Levels
There will be different levels of membership in the Association, depending on type of
home or lot purchased. Because of the different levels of maintenance required, there will
be different levels of homeowner's association fee assessed to each type of unit. This will
be more thoroughly discussed in the declaration of Codes, Covenants and Restrictions,
developed during the fall, 1995.
Design Guidelines
The design guidelines are written with the intent to guide the development and
maintenance of Wolf Creek. They are meant to establish the overall character of the
community as well as to provide a springboard for the design process. All homes
constructed in the single-family section of Wolf Creek will be subject to review and
approval of the Architectural Committee of the Wolf Creek Homeowners Association, Inc.
These guidelines will indicate acceptable and unacceptable construction materials for the
primary and related structures, site design and landscaping. These guidelines are not
meant to cover all site-specific adaptations, nor should they be used as a substitute for
common sense and in each case should be applied to better the objective, described
above. The Architectural Review Committee shall review design solutions taking into
consideration the overall quality of the design, materials, and colors to be used.
21
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
II. CIRCULATION
PRINCIPLES GUIDING CIRCULA liON
The main entrance road should be distinct, with landscaped median.
The traditional main street found in many Shenandoah Valley towns provides inspiration
for the Village home plan.
Wolf Run - Entrance Area
The entrance area consists of two single lanes with a landscaped median. Meadow
Trail, along the eastern side of the entrance is setback from the curbs as topography
allows. This road will be dedicated to VDOT. Maintenance for the road will be by VDOT.
Maintenance for the landscape - both median and adjacent to the roadway - is proposed
by the homeowner's association.
Wolf Run and Wolf Crest
The two-lane road through the single-family parts of the PRD is dedicated to VDOT in 50'
rights-of-way. These 30' roads will feature asphalt construction, lined with curb and
gutter. Maintenance for these roads will be by VDOT.
Village Streets
Used as the main street in the village home areas of Village at Stone Creek, Rockbridge1
and Beech Cove, the asphalt road is constructed with curb and gutter. Except for Village
at Stone Creek, a 3' stamped concrete sidewalk in a herringbone, brick pattern or a
herringbone brick sidewalk is placed behind the curb. A special paving surface will
distinguish the entrance areas into these neighborhoods.
Deck Home Streets and Parking
Richards Wood is distinguished by a special entrance paving zone, and will have an 18'
wide street. This street will remain private, will have curb and gutter, and will have
stamped concrete sidewalks on the side of the street toward houses. Maintenance for
sidewalks and private streets will be by the Homeowners' Association.
22
ex>
o
a
N
m
N
'-
<1J
..0
E
QJ
u
Q)
o
(/)
OJ
s::: -
OJ
~
10
c
b.O
.V;
Q) >-
Qc
~o
.~ OJ
L. E
U 0
.....:t:
oti
~~
-c
c
co
OJ
tlO
:m
:;
>-
"E
o
tn
QJ
E
o.
:r:
~
"E
ro
u..
Q)
""GO
c:
Vi
1i
Ie
QJ
1a I
:!
QJ
:ii
nI
C.
QI
u
U
nt
C
~
'"'C ~
L.. C co
QJ -e
w ,Q) OJ '-
~ --c OJ ~ 1::. 0
> Q) s.... tV '"0 E
"-8. 'v) ..... b.O L- .~ ,OJ
.f-I +-' ~ ~ bO '- Q) QJ
Q) ~ ..c .s::: ..c ..c c ~ ...., . ...., , ......
l:i:: tLO ,~ b.D bll ('0 .J:: :c 1:
Q) c: .C 'e 'i: ~ .E. b.O
0: i- S S
a:: cc a:l co cc 0 Q.. ::i
-
....., ro
ro ;:
.J::
aJ ~ L-
~ Vl 0
OJ U 't:
~ (ii OJ
U1 ~ "$(
QJ a. c: -c
ro L- 'm 0 OJ
c- o L. QJ
...., 0.
~ -0 ~ ..c
u :2 M"'tJ .....
"ii. :J C OJ 0
,*i: ..c ro (5 :a ..c .....
VI C V) "C L.. L..
JY E 'bD 'E 'S u co 0
ftI ~ 'C ..c [l t (5
:! 0 QJ OJ "'0 ~ 0 u
V)
QI ~ vi' L.. ...., c.n 0 E ~
a 'v; c '0 ro
:is c 0 L.. ~
.p.;- 'm ...... c. dJ u L.. t
J9 .f: c: ro
.f-I OJ E ~ ..c -0 w
CL ctl Vl a... ro 1: +-'
L.. 0 L..
I QJ a. 0 ro u a. en 0 QJ cv
U L- a. OJ :c :tj
u 0 U') "C "tJ >-
c( 0 s::: cu 0 ..c: ~ 'P Q)
.C u
ro ...., 0 V) Vl m ro
QJ ~ W L.. taD
So- ro ~ 's.. ro - - c- o..
I >< ...., > 3 ..c w Q) E L-
a 'E c: 0 ro t '- 0
OJ OJ E OJ QJ .... .f-I ~ ij
Ul ...... "'0 0 0. ..c c c C b.O 0 '~ OJ OJ 0 0 0
10- .-: Q) ..... '- L.. ~ 'v; ..... ~ E u -0 u
::3 In co co no :: 0 L... ro co
0 :> V1 co 0 C. L- OJ 0 +-' 0 Q) Q.. 0- m U <1J
c: c: co "'0 :2 0 +-' 0 L- l:. ~ > c: "- OJ c::
d ""0 "'C c: co '- ~ 0 '- L.. 0
W 'm c "- co VJ u E -9 .c 1: .... 0 0 Q) 0
C t ('0 1';)
V') ~ 0 co :i:i ..c t\O "0 -0 Vl ~ OJ
V) co Q) ro .x ..c co -0 L- eo
c: ~ 0 (1) ton V) Q) Q) .c
.-e '"C "'0 ..c :J u ..c: 0 :.c L- a > u u OJ Vl
0 0 s- a... b.C t '- >- '> ~ a> '-
c. .f-I ::t:: :p QJ Q) E 0
.c ..c co co c c c. ro E '"tJ 1- .c '~
ro ro co 0 0 ro ~ QJ >- 0- L.. OJ ro .f-I :::J co OJ QJ "' (5
:2 u u co ca U > Vl (tJ (.!J l.!J a:: C 0 co Z ~ ~ U1 u V')
- QJ
Vl
:J
0
..c
0 OJ
..c
t:tO u ......
c U 4-
:a ::J 0
<4-J
GI -Vi U') 'CR
I II. E u I./')
:s '.P m
....
cv ::J Q} c:
QJ ,* C U1 ..c
2! +-' ro
u. CIJ OJ "E OJ c: ...c
.t: ~ n; b.O liD >- +-I
C ::l
ClI :: ~ c V) QJ
m :2 '- ""-
"ii. co "- Vi '- 0 0
a. Q. 0 t.n E
0 0
'-II L. .~, ""C QJ ~ U
0 0 0 >- ...::a.::: C 0 u E 0
u
0: 15 :d 0 c "i: 0 0 :J 'C Z
~ :> +-' $ .f-I
U U OJ V') V) I- *
m
N
-
~
E
o
:I:
<(
"ii
IIoC
IV
...
m
~
CJ
::a
.nJ
.....
CL
q)
::J
<C
~
o
E
~I
~I
01
>-
~,
..c
:~
~
<U
c:
o
~
cu
>
p
ca
Z
--
-
QJ
'-
:s
....
m
1.1.
~.,I
GJ '
c
E
is
C
QD
';;
QJ
OJ ~,-c
tl c 01'15
"i: 0 0 10
to ~ tI: I a:
OJ
:E
CO
t!3
OJ
::E
~
~
QI
>
OJ
U')
o
.......
.5
t.a-
o
e
QJ
:0
m,
OJ
C
10
'0
VI
I~
E
QJ
PE
..rg
W
J::.
<fool
b.O
c::
~.J!!
0. QJ 0
X m e
I I
I i
19
cu
E .....,
'"'0 121
QJ W!
N
'2 -CI
~I
m I tll)1
> I C Co
fa V') "e
OJ c:
'- c '- I (IJ
0 ~ I 0 ..c
E 't:;; .....,
blJ to L.
::J a. OJ
c: c ! ..c
oe u:: L.. a.o
I 0 0 00 :2
::J e I c
ro 0 c: U1
cu ro .::t!.
-~ ~ .p ..c c
ro ....... co
fJ I > .... .c
OJ ~ rn OJ '"'C
S 0 .....,
)( ~"I tV
~ tV a.
J!l i- 0
"'0 "E bQ! 'Vi
0 "E '+-
0 Vl ::5 0 ~
... QI ....., ~
bb QJ m l!! u
]i E 'e iE
c: C tJ.O
W :c "'C I :J E c
E VI & 1 t)IJ ~ '2
>- ] c 0 'co
c: E 'u '.P E
:E CIJ ~ t- ro
:E 0 0: Q)
Vl u.. cr:
Vi
c
~
II)
'-
2
~
QI
n;
... 0..
Q) '-
tv 0
0)0
tau
OJ 1- QJ E
c 0 QJ n1
ta N VI (JJ
15.~ol.l)
~ ~].~
J: ClJ ::s *C
::J g. 1;; ~
::!Vi5vt
ID
1io
c
:c
V1
...
o
ID
.:.c
co
.s:::.
VI .....
"'C OJ
g ~
~8
m
::J
~
~
'-
(Q
"tJ
o
+oi'
E
::J
~
E
'*'-
o
OJ
.....
RI
......
ft:I
J:
.....
> l!!
~ 0
WJ 8
~ i l!J
I~ "ffi ~ ~ ~ i
:::s 0 U'1 '" .a co
1_ ~ Is:. ':;" ~ co
~(QE~~~
::E6t!)~c~
I-
o
~ ~
to ::J
~~
~....
u::{;
~ 'j
~ ..n
Ql)QJ
-lib
f c;
.e~
QJ~
.~ ~
-5 a.
< ~
\t-
o
o
...
(I)
-S
4-
o
...
o
8 ~
-5.:.:~ ~~ ~
....., U ..:at: C U c: >
to ro ~ e ro e ~
~iiioO)aicc~
..n-
o..
fJ
~
c=
.E J!J
ti ~
:r:o
~ .5
>..0
15 E
co.:!
0:: C.
E
't:
J-
.......
.c
.2P
~
l/)
VI
t1C
c:
";:
~
o
........
V)
L.n
ri
V)~
(]J U')
tn OJ
5 V)
..c: ~
~..c
~ ~
a.A "Ii:
. ,
M N
\n
1-
m
E
I-
o
o
<IJ
a.
ta
..c
en
"'0
c
fa U1
ut QJ'
Ul 't:
ca ~
:!I .E
bOtn"O
C OJ QJ'
~ -fi ID
.- ..... ~
::J 0 0
l:Oo..u
wi
i
:2
...... I
+-' m
c: C
~ .c
'+- .....,
~ ';:
...... s:::::
E ~
~~
r;~
~ rei
C'D a.
c: :::J
en Co
Co OJ
ot;)
~
o
o
~ b.O
l:lD c:
m' :.0
; ~
(!)l!l
ll::t
N
(tp
bJ)
roo
o
o
\f0-
E
(tIi
::::s
tT
V)
QJ
en
~
o
..c
OJ
.t:
+-t
4-
o
E
:J
E
'2
'E
~
l/')
~
C
(01
C
QJ
t:
:3
c.,
0.1
-<
1-
o
.t:
OJ
"5(
UJ
00
0
0
N
ni
("'.l
1....
QJ
...0
E
OJ I
u I
OJ I I
C
i
I
II I
ca
tt:
OJ
....
nJ
:!
Q.I
::a
J9
a..
pj
u
ft1
C
:J
VI
10
*C:
OJ I
...... U1
co c:
; ~ .g
.i!: ~I ~
~I:E ::J
.E CD (IJ!~
~ ';'~' ~ I ~
E ~= c: ~ OJ
'"C 0 to 0 0 E
O)_::J U U OJ
'a 8 ,!!! "C 3i v
~ ~i~ ~Il
(DloO~~'o..
-
n;
Ie
cu
+t
ftI
~
CUi
:s
i
B
<
-
c
~
e,
..D
i
.r::.
..:.( . ~ Q)
u > >,.1::
cii~~~
~
~ 0
m :Eu
.. ~
cu 2:,' ffi ~
Ii. GI Vi OJ
au...,-c
(Q r::: ..c QJ
~~~~
~ ~ Qj
:s 0 ..c
Co c. 0
~ .. ..
QJJJ~
.~ 0 Co
U1o..b,O
OJ
~
o
.c
c:
'(0
E
'f.!oo
o
co
'C
OJ
.....
ro
E
.... "lJ
o :;
(5
u ~
~__i~
c I ~" Wi....
.s I 1U *t: I }:)'
~~~8
co '- 0 QJ
OJ 0 ..... ..c
- E ....
e 8 .2 ~
~ af ~ ta
z~~~
I "C
QJ
.c
u
ro
t:
m
\:J
c:
n:J
U'l
boO
I .5
~;g
c: :J
1.2 .D
I ~ ~
<0
b:O
c:
.u
c:
~
-0
?-
m
o
.0
v)...
biD
C
'~
c:
ra
-a
..'X: [
.~ I'D
.. U
C QJ ~
'to ::c I c
-5 .(7) ~
"0 (g, c'"
c ro c. 0
!9Yt:'.P
~>QJ.a
:; c ~ ~
\:1 '> W .C
o~QJO
c~-S-E
31 :c B!.~
to ~ c c:
.- QJ QJ
~g:g~
~(f:EcX
t
:J
o
CI) U
<U r.n
tlO .-
f 2
fO QJ
tulJ-
U1
(5
o
c.
bJ)
c
'E
E
, .~
[ V'l
lit
co
12:!
ito
QJ
u
I .~
OJ
I/)
"C
C
I'D
VI
CI)
I~
~+:;
::J
.n-
o.
I~
Ie.
I ~....
C
IV
~-c
'3 ~
g e
c ~
Q} OJ
~~
~:5
tV
'W
t3
c
o
u
~~]~
co ~ Q..ro
..c U E ..c "'ti
c. ae: fi o.'e
:( V')~m
o.a
.5
I a. ~
~ ~
Il VI
~ ~
-a~
c ro
ro 0-
Ja "C '"
's fij ~
ID Q.t ~ ::
~ Q C1J ~
:p J2 .b 'e
::::'J;nVlO
I
I
I
I
I VI
I ro
'e
OJ
.......
(tJ
E
I I ..,
c:
co
C.
u
.f;i
0
~
I
U")
N
!
I
!
II)
E
....
~
"'C
C
~
c: '" -
~ ~ E ~
E ~ ~ ~
~,_,o,' b.O
"C (U>_ _~ .!::,' -_
c ,1:
~ 2P~ ~
t;B~
~~ca
OJ ~
~ QJ
'-
(tJ
n; QJ
0..-5
1: 0
to +-I
0: ~
~ ~
.!!lz
~ E
o
tl~
II~
c:
OJ
OJ
'-
U
V1
~~
~ '5j
Q) -:v
~ E
c ....,
"i~ ;
00:
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
SETBACK AND THE LANDSCAPE PROTECTION ZONE
1. Houses will be set back 30' from the edge of right-of-way for public roads,
10' for each side yard, and 25' from the rear yard. No site or landscape
structures may be built in the back 20' of rear yard.
2. No tree with a diameter of over 6" caliper shall be removed unless
necessary for construction of the primary residence. Virginia Pines and
other hazard trees may be excluded from this rule. Where possible, a tree
survey with all 6" cal. and over trees denoted is required to be reviewed by
the Architectural Review Committee and the Roanoke County planning staff
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Trees which are so close to the
house as to be compromised during construction or present a possible
danger after construction despite careful and prudent construction activity,
may be excluded from these requirements after review and approval of the
Architectural Review Committee and county planning staff.
Front setback - 30'
Driveway cut zone
Sideyard setback - 10'
House cut zone - offset rectangle
Rearyard setback - 25'
Landscape Protection
3. For those lots situated in the woods, no tree above 6" cal. will be removed
in the front of the house between house and roadway, except for a swath
the desired width for driveway paving, with as much as 3' allowed on each
side beyond the edge of pavement. This shall be delineated on the tree
survey, mentioned above.
26
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
IV. LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES
The landscape of Wolf Creek is integral to its success. Each area composes part of the
entire landscape of Wolf Creek. The planted motor courts and courtyards will provide
quiet places for resting and relaxing outdoors. Behind village motor courts, adjacent to
the Wolf Crest lots, fruit trees planted in rows will provide orchards in addition to
providing shade and wind protection. The landscape for the Meadow will be of a more
rural character to blend in with the countryside, and the Blue Ridge Parkway beyond. The
ground plane materials shall be brick, stamped concrete made to look like brick, native
stone, or brown pebble. Each motor court shall have a minimum of either 2 planting beds
(total minimum area + 40 s.f.) or two trees. Maintenance of these will be the responsibility
of the homeowners association.
Village Landscape Guidelines
Motor courts
The ground plane materials shall be brick, stamped concrete made to look like brick,
native stone or brown pebble. Each motor court shall have a minimum of either 2 planting
beds (total minimum area = 40s.f.) or two trees. Maintenance of these will be the
responsibility of the homeowners association.
Pedestrian Walkways
Each public pedestrian walkway shall be punctuated with planting beds in areas that do
not already feature natural amenities. An Arbor will be constructed in Beech Cove in the
open space across from the entrance. Maintenance of these will be the responsibility of
the homeowners association.
Front and Rear yards
Areas for individual expression, there will be a small lot of land which accommodates
each village home. Between the fence and the front door, for example, or between the
back door and the street, each home has its own plaza, averaging 120 s.f., with adjacent
areas for individual gardens, which is the responsibility of the individual homeowner to
maintain. Fences, trails, trees, and plantings will be used to create spaces as well as to
screen unsightly elements.
Deck Home Landscape Guidelines
In contrast to the wooded quality of the single-family lots and the cultivated quality of the
village landscape, the landscape of Richard's Wood is designed to represent a wood's
edge environment. Houses are perched to be exactly on the woods edge, with a meadow
landscape in front and woodlands in back. Because of this unique and fragile concept, all
maintenance in these neighborhoods beyond the building line is the responsibility of the
homeowners association.
Several boulders have been placed in a circular arrangement. The area within this circle
will be planted with a flowering ground cover. Five flowering dogwood trees and five red
maples will be planted randomly between the boulders and gazebo. Ten azalea bushes
27
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
will be planted on each side of the stone steps to be place from Jenny Lane to the
gazebo and six butterfly bushes will be planted around the gazebo. A monument-style
sign identifying Richard's Wood with landscaping surrounding it shall be installed at the
intersection of Wolf Run and Jenny Lane(at the 2301 Jenny Lane lot).
Boulders will be used aesthetically throughout the property, or will be removed from the
property.
HARDSCAPEPALETTE
Fences in the Deck home, Single-family neighborhoods and the Meadow may be
compatible with Blue Ridge Parkway Design Guidelines. Fences in the village, when out-
of-view of the Parkway, will be more detailed, inspired by more local precedent (pickets).
Railings may be made of wood or dark color steel.
Walls may be constructed of brick, decorative concrete block, or field stone and mortar
or dry-laid. The field stone may set in an uncoursed roughly squared pattern as below.
3 Board Fence for Village
Right: Picket Fence for Village
Below: Meadow Fences; spiked rail
and fieldstone wall
28
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
Signage
Wolf Creek development signs shall be of the monument type, those with their base
on the ground. The entrance demarcation will be incorporated into a wall. Signs shall
include no more than three colors, and one of the colors will be from the palette of
Blue Ridge Parkway signage colors.
Trail signage
Shingle signs shall be made of wood and shall be left a natural color or can be
painted with approved paint colors. They shall measure a maximum of 2'x 4'.
Should the use of bridges be required,
they will be modeled on Blue Ridge
Parkway precedent, for both vehicular
and pedestrian bridges. Below is a
concept study for a vehicular bridge over
a creek, using a large precast culvert as
the interior structure, and arched
wingwalls typical on Blue Ridge Parkway 1_
bridges. The uncoursed, roughly-squared
pattern of masonry will be used.
PLANT PALETTE
This plant palette is meant as a general guideline for the entire planned community. It
consists of native plants to the Blue Ridge, with a few introduced species that have been
in our region for centuries. Individual site variations occur that make some of these
plants better candidates for selection. It is recommended that a Landscape Architect or
Horticulturist be consulted to draw detailed planting designs.
Wolf Run Entrance (criteria: large, grand trees)
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus rubra
Quercus velutina
(Tulip Poplar)
(American Beech)
(Sycamore)
(Red Oak)
(Black Oak)
29
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
Villaqe (criteria: detailed and flowerinq trees)
Liquidambar styraciflua
Nyssa sylvatica
Quercus coccinea
Acer rub rum
Oxydendrum arboretum
Stewartia ovata
Com us florida
Cercis canadensis
Amelanchier Canadensis
Malus & Pyrus species
Hibiscus syriacus
Magnolia grandiflora
(American Sweetgum)
(Black Gum)
(Scarlet Oak)
(Red Maple)
(Sourwood)
(Mountain Stewartia)
(Flowering Dogwood)
(Eastern Redbud)
(Serviceberry)
(Flowering crabapple, apple, & pear)
(Rose-of-Sharon)
(Southern Magnolia)*
Deck homes (criteria: woods edqe)
Acer rubrum
Oxydendrum arboreum
Stewartia ovata
Comus florida
Cercis Canadensis
Amelanchier Canadensis
Pinus echinata
!lex opaca
Fraxinus Americana
Cedrus virginiana
(Red Maple)
(Sourwood)
(Mountain Stewartia)
(Flowering Dogwood)
(Eastern Redbud)
(Serviceberry)
(Shortleaf Pine)*
(American Holly)
(American Ash)
(Eastern Red Cedar)
Sinqle Family Lots (criteria: canopy native trees)
Quercus acutissma
Quercus falcata
Quercus laurifolia
Quercus phellos
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Acer saccharum
Nyssa sylvatica
Liquidambar styraciflua
Com us f10rida
Cercis canadensis
Magnolia virginian a
Platanus occidentalis
(Chestnut Oak)
(Southern Red Oak)
(Laurel Oak)
(Willow Oak)
(Tulip Poplar)
(American Beech)
(Sugar Maple)
(Black Gum)
(American Sweetgum)
(Flowering Dogwood)
(Eastern Redbud)
(Sweetbay Magnolia)
(Sycamore)
30
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
Picea abies
Pinus echinata
Ilex opaca
Magnolia grandiflora
(Norway Spruce)*
(Shortleaf Pine)*
(American Holly)
(Southern Magnolia)
Evergreen shrubs for Courtyards and Detailed Spaces
Kalmia latifolia
Ilex glabra
Rhododendron catawbiense
Rhododendron carolinianum
(Mountain Laurel)*
(I nkberry)
(Catawba Rhododendron)*
(Carolina Rhododendron)
Deciduous shrubs for Courtyards and Detailed Spaces
Ilex verticillata
Aronia arbutifolia
Lindera benzoin
C/ethra alnifolia
Rhododendron calendulaceum
Rhododendron indicum
Rhododendron austrinum
Sambucus canadensis
(Common Winterberry)
(Red Chokeberry)
(Spicebush)
(Summersweet Clethra)
(Flame Azalea)
(Indica Azalea)
(Karume Azalea)
(American Elder)
Nonnative favorites to use occasionally in your own garden:
These are encouraged in the village outside of view of the Parkway
Magnolia soulangiana
Magnolia stellata
Prunus species
Albizia Julibrissin
Hydrangea arborescens
Buxus sempervirens
Taxus species
Syringa Vulgaris
(Saucer Magnolia)
(star Manolia)
(Flowering cherries)
(Mimosa)
(Hydrangea)
(English Boxwood) *
(English Yew)
(Common Lilac)
* good for screening
31
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
I /_LI
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
Appointments to Committees, Commissions, and Boards
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
Brenda J. Holton
Deputy Clerk to the Board
B. Clayton Goodman, 1I11?GU-
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. League of Older Americans - Advisory Council
The one-year term of Beverly Eyerly will expire on March 31,2009.
2. Library Board (appointed by district)
Lisa Boggess, Vinton Magisterial District, is no longer a County resident. Herfour-year
term expired on December 31,2008.
Herman Lowe, Catawba Magisterial District, resigned effective January 5, 2009. His
four-year term will expire on December 31, 2011.
3. Roanoke County Community leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RC-
CLEAR) (appointed by district)
At the February 24, 2009 meeting, the Board confirmed the appointment of five
members to this committee. Each supervisor was asked to appoint two citizens who
live, work or do business in the County to serve on this committee. The term for each
of these appointments is three years and the initial terms will be staggered and
expiration dates determined after all of the appointments have been made and
confirmed.
The Board needs to appoint five additional members as follows: (1) Supervisor
Church, one member; (2) Supervisor Altizer, two members; and (3) Supervisor Flora,
two members.
4. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission
The three-year term of Charles Blankenship will expire on April 8, 2009.
2
J- /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2009
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM J- CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 24,
2009 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Item 1, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes - December 16, 2008
That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law
to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant
to this resolution.
N~)
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
% of General
Amount Fund Revenue
Audited balance at June 30, 2008 $ 16,743,199 9.51 % *
Addition for 2007-08 Operations 906,609
Appropriation for staff at the Clearbrook Station (156,000)
Balance at March 24, 2009 $ 17,493,808 9.30% **
Note: On December 21,2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General
Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years.
* 2007-08 a range of 8.5%-9.5% of General Fund Revenues
2007-2008 General Fund Revenues $176,033,678
8.5% of General Fund Revenues $14,962,863
9.5% of General Fund Revenues $16,723,199
** 2008-09 a range of 9.0%-10.0% of General Fund Revenues
2008-2009 General Fund Revenues $188,178,858
9.0% of General Fund Revenues $16,936,097
10.0% of General Fund Revenues $18,817,886
The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 9.30% which is within the ran
for 2008-09. The balance will be increased over time to the following ranges:
2009-2010
2010-2011
9.5%-10.5%
10.0%-11.0%
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By B. Clayton "Clay" Goodman III
County Administrator
N-~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL RESERVES
Minor County Capital Reserve
(Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.)
Audited balance at June 30, 2008
Amount
$1,540,757.20
Addition for 2007-2008 Operations
298,490.00
Unappropriate funds for architect/engineering fees for the renovation
of the former Southview Elementary School
175,000.00
Appropriate additional funding for Bent Mountain Station Parking Lot
(81,376.00)
Balance at March 24, 2009
$1,932,871.20
Maior County Capital Reserve
(Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.)
Audited balance at June 30, 2008
$2,339,030.00
Balance at March 24, 2009
$2,339,030.00
Submitted By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By
B. Clayton "Clay" Goodman III
County Administrator
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
From 2008-2009 Original Budget
June 24, 2008
Allocation to Art Museum of Western Virginia and Roanoke County
Public Schools for Education
July 8, 2008
Appropriation for Legislative Liaison
August 28, 2008
Appropriation for Development of a Regional Water Supply Plan
Balance at March 24, 2009
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By B. Clayton "Clay" Goodman III
County Administrator
^/__2,
/ V .--..-/
Amount
$ 300,000.00
(200,000.00)
($24,000.00)
($11,100.00)
$ 64,900.00
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
/J-LI
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Accounts Paid-February 2009
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
B. Clayton "Clay" Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit
Checks
Total
Payments to Vendors
Payroll 02/06/09
Payroll 02/20/09
Manual Checks
Voids
Grand Total
$
$
1,018,560.81
1,071,549.29
93,486.17
99,106.40
3,640.72
$ 7,875,259.46
1,112,046.98
1,170,655.69
3,640.72
$ 10,161,602.85
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
fY C
-.J
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Analysis of Comparative Schedule of Budgeted and Actual
Expenditures and Encumbrances for the Month Ended February 28,
2009
SUBMITTED BY:
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY:
B. Clayton Goodman, III '~
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Comparative Schedule of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances - Highlights
General Government Administration
. General Government Administration is primarily comprised of County Administration, Clerk to
the Board of Supervisors, Public Information, County Attorney, Human Resources, Finance,
Management and Budget, Registrar, Commissioner of the Revenue and the Treasurer.
. General Government Administration expenditures are 5.53% or $288,387 higher than the
previous year. This increase is primarily attributed to increased costs associated with
employee benefits.
Judicial Administration
. Judicial Administration consists of Circuit Court, General District Court, Magistrate, Juvenile
and Domestic Relations Court, and Court Service Unit.
. Judicial Administration expenditures are 16.94% or $220,936 higher than the prior year.
This increase is attributed to increased costs associated with employee benefits, repairs
to the HVAC system at the courthouse, and maintenance and repairs to the security
system in the courthouse.
1
Public Safety
. Public Safety includes the departments of Police, Fire and Rescue and Sheriff.
. Public Safety expenditures increased 5.04% or $1,044,814 from the prior year. This increase
is primarily attributed to increased costs associated with employee benefits, full year funding
of the four positions added to the Hollins station mid-year during 2007-08, and full year
funding of six positions for a new patrol unit and a new School Resource Officer added mid-
year during 2007-08.
Public Works
. Public Works includes the departments of General Services Administration, Solid Waste,
Custodial Services, Welding Shop, Engineering and Building Maintenance.
. Public Works expenditures decreased 6.42% or $613,815 over the prior year. Though
employee benefits increased, the decrease is attributed to the fact that the VDOT revenue
sharing of $1 miliion was paid from the general fund operating last year and in the current
year we budgeted and paid for this expenditure from the capital account established new in
2008-09.
Health and Welfare
. Health and Welfare is the department of Social Services which administers all public
programs within the federal/state guidelines.
. Expenditures for Health and Welfare increased 6.61 % or $402,434 from the prior year. This
increase is attributed to the state of the economy and the additional services that Social
Services provided based on the needs of the citizens.
Parks, Recreation and Cultural
. Parks, Recreation and Cultural include the departments of Parks, Recreation and Tourism
and the Library.
. Expenditures for Parks, Recreation and Cultural increased 9.80% or $363,267 from the prior
year. This increase is attributed primarily to increased costs of employee benefits and
utilities.
Community Development
· Community Development includes Planning Services Administration, Illegal Dumps,
Planning Commission, Planning Services Transportation, and Economic Development.
· Expenditures for Community Development increased 22.70% or $274,729 from the previous
year. This increase is attributed primarily to restructuring in the department of Community
Development. For the purpose of this report, Engineering is categorized as Public Works
and had decreased expenditures as a result of this reorganization. This categorization for
Community Development will be corrected at the end of this fiscal year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept report as presented.
2
" "
OJ) 0;
~ 0
.!2
r::
Cl
...
:;
Gi
.lIl:
o
r::
IV
o
a::
....
o
~
r::
::::l
o
<.J
0--
o
o
N
t:::
~
'"
en
III
U
r::
IV
...
.c
E
::::l
U
C
W
'C
C
IV
en
III
...
::::l
:!::
'C
r::
III
c.
)(
w
"i
::::l
-
u
<C
'C
r::
IV
'C
III
-
III
Cl
'C
::::l
III
....
o
-
r::
III
E
III
-
IV
-
rn
III
>
:;::;
IV
...
IV
C.
E
o
(J
'"
o
;;0
N
N
o
'C
GI
'C
c:
W
'C
o
.;::
GI
Q.
oS
c:
o
:E
co
o
GI
oS
...
o
...
GI
o
... c:
o III
e;e~
VI
iii
.a
o
c(
..c.......
'gEoGl
GI :I
~g
WW
""
...:i
IV
~
VI
VI GI
GI g
.a CO
:c..c
c: E
GI :I
0.0
>< c:
ww
""
....
GI
Cl
'C
:I
ID
..c...
'g E 0
8. rl
anJi
""
.;:
IV
~
~
o
'C
0.:.
VI
GI
VI 0
GI c:
... III
.a.c
'6 E
c: :I
GI 0
0. c:
>< w
w""
Gi
Cl
'C
:I
ID
'"
<:>
<:>
N ::;;:
~
0--
lr'l ~
-0 ::::
6 0
I'- ~ L()
0) L() I'-
o:i u;> a)
~
C') C') <0
o L() C')
'<t <0
oiar-:
N ~ u;>
e;e'O
III :I
VlID
III
N I'- ~
L() L() '<t
.,j N r-.:
<0 <0 I'-
co C') '<t
o I'- '<t
'<t <0 ~
ari ..q~ 'T"""
<0 co L()
N 0) N
'<to
0) ~ L()
C') C') ~
~ L() I'-
T""" cD ..q-
~ <0 N
'<t 0) C')
r-:
~'O
III :I
VlID
III
I'- C') N
o N 0)
C"i .,j oi
I'- <0 L()
~ 0 co
~ N 0
co L() I'-
..t'<tC"i"
O)NO)
N I'- ~
'<to
C') 0) 0
L() I'- <0
'<t N N
C"i".oC"i"
o L() N
'<t C') C')
r-:
~
U;
"2 CJ)
'E (ij
1::J '(3
-< li::
(ij 0
'g oil
11l "E
c: 11l
i.L 0
CIl oil III
~roro
.~ 0
~ ~ u
.3<3~
~ N C')
000
000
..,
In
'1
M g
N N
~ C';'J
I'-
co
..,
<Ii
co
~
0) I'-
L() I'-
C') L()
aa
~ ~
N
N
..;
CD
o N
co co
cO ci
L() I'-
CD
N
~
...
o
In
.n
C') C')
~ r::
'<to a
N 0
co I'-
In
co
In
N
o
....
<Ii
~ <0
co I'-
C') C')
N' oi
o co
'<to 0)
o
In
~
CD
N L()
'<t C')
.,j .,j
L() <0
'"
..,
o
ri
...
N
.n
L() <0
L() C')
N ~
'<to a
C') I'-
I'- L()
N
'"
"!.
...
co
o
<Ii
'<t C')
C') L()
C') 0)
oi.o
'<t co
~co
....
g
VI
'2
'E
'C
c(
C
GI
E
c:
...
CIl
>
o
l!)
iii
~
c:
GI
l!)
t::
o
a.
a.
:::J
C/)
ro
:Q
1::J
:::J
'" --,
t:: ~
:::J L::
<3 (5
o
o
...
o
~ N
o 0
N N
o 0
..,
'"
cd
";"
co<O<OC')
L() 0 L() 0)
<;' ~ ~ 1
CD
..,
'"
o
N
~
o ..q co r::
~ ~ ~ 'T"""
oioioi<D
"'i ~ ~ ";"
....
....
..;
CD
'T""" M (0 M
o <0 '<t co
ci r-.: to C"i
I'- <0 <0 I'-
....
N
..,
.n
N
III
M ..q 0 'If""'"
N '<t '<t co
C') <0 O. C')
<D~ o~ __ ..qk
C') co 0 '<t
<.0 __ c.o ("')
a5 a5 '<to
....
In
.....
...
'"
..,
N
o C') <0 0
co 0 L() '<t
'<t I'- '<to '<to
.o.oC')<O
C')O)N<O
C') 0 0). '<t
N N' <0
~ ~
In
..,
00
In
<0 '<t N L()
L() I'- ~
ci cO Lri Lri
I'- <0 <0 <0
...
'"
..,
of
o
~
C') 0 N 0
(OCX)N--
LO __ <0_ N
g~co~
LO <.0 T""" M
a5 r-: '<to
co
co
N
.n
..,
N
N
N C') C') N
<0 '<t I'- 0)
co '<t N I'-
a5.oaC"i"
c.o ,.... en 0
T""" 'f"'"" ("') LO
N'T"""<D
~ ~
c
o
(J
u
li::
11l
~
oil
iii
'0
'6
:I
--,
c:
o
~
~ Q) lH
CIl :J <Il
E u 0 e
8 ~ ~ c
.Q 0:: C 0
- 1::J .Q (J
c c U
W co <Il E
~ ~ ~ 'c
...J i.L (J -<
o
o
N
o
T""" N ("') oo:::t
o 0 0 0
"" "" "" ""
o 0 0 0
..,
o
'1
o 0) co 0 '<t
L()NO)OI'-
M <1' Lri to c:i
~ v ~
..,
...
co
of
..,
o.
";"
0) 0) 0 C') I'-
L() N co N L()
MOlCOoo:::tT"""_
~oifi~-~
"'i ~ ";"
'"
..,
00
CD
f"-..COOT"""'T"""
<OI'-NCC!~
M~ai___
<O<O<OL() I'-
co
co
..,
N
CD
.....
...
N
"" 0 0 0) N
L() '<t 0) I'- N
co 0 M T""" en
oi N r-: ",,' oi
o 0) co co I'-
"" 0 N. "". co
",,' ""
'"
....
q
...
N
~
...
..,
N <0 0) co 0
L() 0) I'- 0 0)
<0 '<t co <0 co
<DC"i"cioiC"i"
COI'-L()<O""
"'<tl'-.I'-<O"!.
"'<t "'<to N
In
CD
00
CD
coO) co L()LO
~L()O)<O~
r::~~~(O
..,
....
In
,.:
...
....
o
N
N 0 0 N L()
N;::U;~_~
gg~co~
""OCOL()I'-
C"i" N N'
o
....
..,
<Ii
....
...
o
..,
m m c.o N N
o I'- "" 0 L()
r--.. v M N T"""
oi C"i" <D a5 N'
0) I'- 0) I'- co
oo:::t f"-.. N v --
..t "'<to C"i"
~
GI
...
III
1Il
.~
:is
:I
Q.
'"
1::J
C
:J
o
<5
'" oil
(I) Cii r.n
(J '" Ol
.~ 0 c:
OJ ~:2
C/) 0 ':;
ro <Il III
~ ~ c
Q) 05 'm
C) 0:: ::2;
"~ l!!
Qi 0
~ t5
'0, 8.
c: '"
W c:
o
o
..,
o
'T""" N M oo:::t LO
00000
"'<t "'<t "'<t "'<t "'<t
00000
N
..,
cD
co L() co "" '<t
<O~CO
~~~~<9
In
...
co
ri
...
CD
o;~~ffig
N ~_ ~_ u;> ;k
M N cn T"""
C}I C}I I
..,
..,
..;
CD
"'<t <0 I'- 0 0
f"-..<O'T"""CX:>O
C"i Lri ci C"i ci
"'<t <0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~
..,
co
..,
N
In
'"
=
OOO)NO
c.o __ N f"-.. 0
"'<t <0 co N "'<t
"'<to .0 C"i" r-: ci
<OL()NNN
N "" <0 N
C"i"N
Il'l
N
Il'l
of
...
'"
ri
...
N 0 0 "'<t 0
0)L()01'-0
L() co L() N "'<t
"'<to a oi <D a
O----NN
<OT"""<O N
.oN
..,
N
r-:
CD
O""OCOO
oCOO)I'-O
Lri .,j cO Lri ci
I'-<Ocooo
~ ~
'"
'"
...
lIS
CD
Il'l
ai
-- 0 N ""d' 0
L() "" L() 0 0
I'- 1'-. <0 I'- C')
LO~ __ r:t:Jk cD (O~
O)""NNO
("') ,.... ("') N
C'?N
co
....
co
ai
N
N
of
...
CONOL()O
<0 0 0 "'<t 0
<0 "'<t L() N C')
..... a 0)' .0 <D
~~(ON~
"'<to N
VI
...
...
o
~
,~
:is
:I
Q.
c
o
:;:::
~
u;
'c
"E
~ ~ CIl
~ ffi Co
:5 U 1i) U
(ij .~ "00 ro
<Il <Il '" c:
J: C/) -< .Q
.!d co .~ ~ co
:g 'g :g en "g
0.. C/) 0.. c C/)
o
o
..,
o
"" "'<t <0 I'- co
00000
L() L() L() L() L()
o 0 000
...
CD
cs?
..,
..,
..,
N
o
"'i
In
CD
II'i
....
N
....
III
...
'"
..,
cD
CD
...
~
...
co
Il'l
<Ii
co
...
~
....
....
..,
...
ai
co
o
cD
In
...
...
ci
o
N
<Ii
'"
c
o
~
N
"c
co
Ol
o
'"
<Il
U
.~
<Il
C/)
~
J!!
Qi
~
'C
c:
III
oS
iii
CIl
::c:
o
o
In
o
0-
N 0
o
N
;::::
;:;;
" "
OIl 0;
6: 0
ca
'i:
Cl
...
:>
ai
.:.::
o
c
ca
o
0::
-
o
>-
-
C
:I
o
<.J
III
CI)
U
C
ca
...
.c
E
:I
U
C
W
'tl
C
ca
III
CI)
...
:I
..
is
c
CI)
c.
><
w
"iij
:I
-
U
c:(
'tl
C
ca
'tl
CI)
-
CI)
Cl
'tl
:I
m
-
o
..
c
CI)
E
CI)
-
ca
..
CI)
CI)
>
:0:;
ca
...
ca
c.
E
o
<.J
a>
Q
;;:;
N
N
Q
"
Ql
"
c:
W
"
.2
t
Il.
J:
'E
o
==
co
Q
Ql
::
a
lJ..
Ql
U
... c:
o .!!!
';/e. Co
>
III
;a
.a
u
ct
.0'"
-g E 0
8.r:';/e-c
~Ji:&:
oll ell
~
ca
~
..
c
CI)
...
...
:I
U
III
III Ql
e g
.a ell
:c.c
c: E
Ql ~
C. u
>< c:
Ww
oll
Qi
Cl
"
~
III
.0...
-gsoQi
!.c:;';fe-c
~Ji:&:
oll ell
~
ca
~
..::
o
-t:
D.;
III
Ql
III g
f ell
E.c
'6 E
c: ~
Ql U
c.c:
><w
woll
Qi
Cl
"
~
III
t:: ,.\'~.... ..
.t1
.
'"
o
o
N ::8
<C
0-
Ir) c:'!
'0
6 0
-q co '"
It) -q N
~ ~ M
'l?
-q 0) -q
~ 0) It)
N 0) 0
.tNcD
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
r--: C'":i -i
<D <D <D
-q <D <D
co 0) r--
<D_ It) co
'" N N-
co co 0
r--_ CCl. -q
o ~ f2
o 0 It)
ai r-: N-
N It) N
<D 0) <D
NN
'" r-- r--
co Cl 0
cD '" ci
<D <D -q
o co N
r-- 0) N
-q It) co
aiaicD
~~~~~
o co 0)
co It) N
r-- It) 0
N- cD cD
g ~ (0
NN
c
,2
ro
(])
t;
(])
0::
~ ~-~
-'t ,"
co.oS
a.. :.:J U
~ N '"
000
<D <D <D
000
c
(])
E
.c
<..l
.~
UJ
Q
co
~
<D N co It)
~ "If"'" Q') Q')
N f'- c? ~
"'f '"
r--
lQ
N
M
lQ
<?
It) '" <D 0
N "If"'" "If"'" 0
r-- 0) It) <D
.t Lri 0 -q-
~ ~ "i
"l'
It)
.n
lQ
co r-- 0) co
o <D It) 0
ci oj cD '"
r-- N <D 0)
r--
It)
~
ai
lQ
Q
...;
0) It) N 0
<D1t)<D0
<D 0) <D 0)
;t~a;;:
co -q ~
N
N
lQ
ttS
Q
N
uS
It) co It) It)
~ ~ ~ N
ai 0 co" 0
.,... 0> ("') N
"!.. r---. "If"'"
..,
..,
N
lQ
co -q 0) '"
r-- It) 0 r--
ci Ll'i -i oj
It) -q <D 0)
Q
a>
co
III
Q
"'"
M
-q r-- <D 0
-q <D -q 0
0'> co T"""A L.r>
a)N""'~
0) """ LO "If"'"
It) -q ~
"'"
lQ
..,
III
"l'
a>
III
0) 0) 0) It)
ON.,... .,...
v_ .,... 0'>_ co
a;~8~
~ r-- ~
;a
~
:i
u
oll
c:
o
:,::;
ra
Ql
...
U
Ql
a::
vi
.;0:
:;
Il.
E (])
co <..l
g, .~
ct ~
c C c
o (]) co
'w E E
53 g- ::s
>< a; I
UJ a; .8
,~_ 0 c:
<..l ,2
~ 'E E
~ g "C
o 0 C
o <..l 0
U UJ U
Cl
c:
'c
o
N
c1l
Cl
c:
'c
c:
co
c::
Q
Q
lQ
Q
"If"'" N ("') LO
o 0 0 0
r-- r-- r-- r--
o 0 0 0
Q
"'"
N
~
'<t '" co 0 0 0 0
:; ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~
"'7 ~
a>
N
"'"
...;
"'"
~
It) co r-- 0 0 0 0
o 0) N
r-- <D_ -q
o.,...ci
N ' 0)
'l?
r--
"l'
cO
lQ
-q '" It) 0 0 0 0
o It) N Cl 0 Cl Cl
a:i-ia:i ci
-q -q <D It)
lQ
co
~
III
co
"t
,-LOCOOOOO
0) co <D 0
(!) LO "If"'" 0
cn- Lri "If"'" Lri
t;; u:; LO
","
..,
a>
a>
ttS
lQ
~
N
OONOOOCO
NO.,...OODO
<DO"'ooO)co
a5 Lri -q- 0 0 -q- 6
Q') ("') oo::t LO .,... co Q')
Q') .,... f'-.,... 'o:::t
Lri r---
~
"l'
"'"
r..:
It)
"'CO<DOOOO
It) '" It) 0 0 0 0
"If"'" Q) cri c:i 0 0 ci
N '" <D It)
co
It)
"l'
o
~
C'!.
<D <D 0) 0 0 0 0
0) co '" 0
C"? 00_ t"--_ 0
0"'0 Lri
o .,.... N LO
It) co
N
N
"'"
N
uS
a>
Q
N
,..... 0 .,... 0 0 0 0>
r: g ~ 8 g 8 ~
-q- Lri -q- 0 0 0 ai
N ("') "If"'" 0 "If"'" ,..... 0>
("') .,... f'-.,... co
N -q- cD
~
'E
Ql
E
c.
o
Qj
>
Ql
o
l;'
.2
~
E
E
o
u
c. c.
::> c.
c: co
co <..l
(]) '5
U ~ ~
ii: Ic:Q)~
",'0 c1logro
~ffi >.cmco
(])..J ~5ro'O
C:"'''''O [D(])
~E5w~t>ro
~ ~ j ~ u ~.~
o U a; 0:: 3l .!:; 1i
c..~~><~'Eco
~ is ::i: ~ 0:: 8 :5
Q
Q
"'"
Q
.,... N ("') """ co ,..... co
0000000
co co co co co co co
0000000
~
co
ai
";'
~ -q
0) r--
-q C'":i
~ C';J
Q
N
"l'.
....
"'"
'9
<D N
c; ~
N- 6
a; ~
<f
....
It)
uS
....
It) It)
o -q
ci N
<D r--
N
~
~ c;;
o co
66
co <D
N It)
66
It)
....
lQ
Q
...;
Q
"l'
lQ
uS
a>
It)
...;
N
o ~
co 0)
'"
cDai
'" ~
r-- Ol
a5.t
co
a>
Q
~
....
It) '"
N r--
-i N
It) r--
N
N
Q
o
a>
..,
M
'" co
<D 0)
0_
~ g
'" co
cD N-
-q
r--
Q
..,
M
It)
Q
...;
N
N 0)
0) -q
-q 0
aio
r-- <D
-q 0)_
Lri",
co
"5 :;
o 0
]I
c:
Ql
E
1::
ell
C.
Ql
o
C
o
z
~ ~
~ ~
'" '"
c c
co co
~ ~
'0 '0
c: c:
~ .2
(]) ~
c ~
Q
Q
co
Q
~ N
o 0
0) 0)
o 0
N
"l'
.n
";'
'S
o
I!!
oS!
III
c:
ell
~
Q
Q
a>
Q
o
N
Q
";'
co
~
III
a>
It)
Ii
o
N
ClI)
r-:
""
N
Q
"':
Q
r--
ci
lQ
""
(Q
,...:
It)
Q
....
a>
cD
"l'
co
cD
It)
....
Ql
"'"
Il'i
Ql
(Q
Q
....
....
....
r--
It)
III
It)
lQ
M
a>
"'"
ClI)
C"t
....
""
o
N
Ql
....
r--
Q
.n
It)
It)
""
-<i
It)
....
lQ
N.
....
It)
N
ai
"l'
....
"'"
Ql
r-:
""
""
Q
o
....
~
ai
..,
"l'
ai
co
o
M
....
ai'
(Q
""
..j'
ClI)
....
.ia
ca
o
I-
'tl
C
ca
...
C>
ACTION NO.
(Y-lP
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Analysis of Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual
Revenues for the Month Ended February 28, 2009
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
B. Clayton Goodman, III ~/
County Administrator
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues - Highlights
General Property Taxes
. General Property Taxes are comprised of real estate taxes, personal property taxes, public
service Corporation, payment in lieu of taxes and penalties and interest.
. General Property Taxes are approximately 6.9% or $2,948,70'1 higher than the previous
year. This increase is primarily attributed to real estate tax collections being 7.8% higher
than the previous year as a result of the market value and construction reassessment of
8.12% for 2008.
Other Local Taxes
. Other Local Taxes primarily consist of local sales tax, communications sales and use tax,
business license tax, meals tax, hotel and motel tax, taxes on recordation and wills,
consumer utility tax, motor vehicle license fees, and other local taxes.
. Other local taxes have decreased approximately -0.78% or ($135,633) from the prior year.
The significant decrease in this category is in the taxes on recordation and wills; which is tied
to decreases in housing market sales and transfers.
. Also, meals tax and hotel/motel tax are down slightly as a result of the downturn in the
economy.
1
Permits. Fees and Licenses
. Permits, fees, and licenses primarily include animal control fees, land and building fees,
permits, other fees, clerk of court fees and photocopy charges.
. Permits, fees and licenses have decreased approximately -22.87% or ($141,776) from the
prior year. The significant decrease in this category is in the land and building fees and
permits which is also directly attributable to declines in the housing market.
Use of Monev and Property
· Use of money and property includes revenue from interest income and rental income.
. Revenues from use of money and property have decreased approximately -47.36% or
($477,909) from the prior year. This decrease is directly attributable to the earnings on
investments and the significant drop in interest rates from the prior year.
Charaes for Services
· Charges for services are primarily comprised of clerk fees, sheriff fees, fee for ambulance
service, board of prisoners-Salem, and library receipts.
. Charges for services have increased approximately 18.83% or $356,697 from the prior year.
This is primarily attributable to an increase in the amount paid by Salem for the boarding of
prisoners.
Miscellaneous
· Miscellaneous revenues are primarily comprised of recovered costs from the Western
Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Western Virginia Water Authority, and Roanoke Valley
Resource Authority for fiscal agent services, welfare services-Salem, and a host locality fee
for the landfill.
. Miscellaneous revenues have increased approximately 79.61 % or $252,159 from the prior
year. This is primarily attributable to an increase in the services provided to Salem citizen's
in the Social Services department for which we are reimbursed.
State and Federal Revenues
. State and federal revenues primarily consist of funding for welfare program and services,
various departments with constitutional officers (Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue,
Sheriff, Commonwealth Attorney, and Clerk of the Circuit Court), HB599 Law Enforcement,
Library Grant, and Housing State prisoners.
· State and federal revenues have decreased approximately -3.71 % or ($371,651) from the
prior year. This is primarily attributable to the amount that was required to be reimbursed to
the State of Virginia under the reduction in state aid mandate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept report as presented.
2
""
o
o
C:'
r--
'"
"
00
'"
c..
~
Q
III
'c
Cl
"-
:>
<Ii
..ll:
o
c:
III
o
c::
-
o
~
c:
~
o
o
l/I
<P
~
c:
<P
>
<P
c::
iii",
~ 0
-Ci;
UN
<((;j
,,0
c:
III
"
<P
Gi~
Cl-8
" c
~ w
lD~
.... .g
o Gl
-0..
; ..c
E 'E
<p 0
-==
III
-CO
V)o
<p Gl
~=
III 0
Iii u..
Q.
E
o
o
""
o
o
N ::E
::s
~~
00
GO
Ul ...
Gl 0 ...
~ ~ ~
~ lCI -g
Gl Ul III
0::: lCI
Ul ...
Gl 0 ...
:l Gl
C ';Ie C)
~ lCI -g
& lG III
"-
III
~
"-
o
';:
II.;
Gl
U
c
.!!!
~
'0
~
Ul
iii
:l
tl
c(
Ul
Gl
:l
C
Gl
>
Gl
0:::
Gi
Cl
~
:l
III
Ul
Gl
:l
C
Gl
>
Gl
0:::
Gi
Cl
~
:l
III
0> <t
CO ~
....: 0
~
~
'<t
N
L()
I'-
o
c<i
N
~
oj
'<t
N I'-
<0 N
L() ~
ai r-..:
<0 0>
o <0
N
'<t
o
o
o
c::i
'<t
<0
Il'i
CO
0>
0>
<Xi
'<t
N
(")
.,f
0>
0>
as
(")
o
o
o
c::i
0>
L()
ai
I'-
Ul
CD
X
Cll
I-
CD
1il
U;
w
(ij
CD
0::
o
~
o
(")
'<t
CO
L()
I'-
~
,
o
L()
N
o
o
o
c::i
0>
CO
r-..:
N
<0
o
C'i
o
I'-
0>
N
I'-
CO
o
o
o
Il'i
N
L()
aJ-
N
rJJ
CD
X
Cll
I-
>-
t::
CD
C-
e
Cl..
ro
c:
o
~
<Il
Cl..
~
~
o
I'-
~
o
CO
'<t
~
'<t-
(")
<0
....:
0>
o
L()
~
L()
aJ
'<t
N
o
o
L()
Il'i
'<t
L()
N
CO
<0
..,f
o
~
N
o
~
CO
'<t
N
o
o
o
c::i
I'-
(")
N
<Il
rJJ
Cll
CO
C-
is
t)
<Il
u
.~
<Il
en
.!,1
:0
:J
Cl..
N
~
o
'<t '<t
I'- ~
C'i
o '<t
(") N
<0 L()
(")-
'<t
'<t 0>
N L()
<Xi cD
L() '<t
(")
0>
a,
~
(")
o
o
o.
o
N
<0
~
aJ
C'i
L()
(")
<0
'<t
r-..:
~
(")
o
o
o
c::i
0>
L()
>-
t::
<Il
C-
o
ct
c:
o
u;
~
CD
C
06
rJJ
<Il
~
(ij
c:
<Il
Cl..
(")
~
o
<0
(")
o
aJ
o
o
o
N
I'-
~
o
I'-
Lei
'<t
N
~
<0
as
I'-
o
o
o
N
I'-
~
rJJ
<Il
X
Cll
I-
o
:J
<Il
::J
c:
C
<Il
E
>-
Cll
Cl..
'<t
~
o
o
'"
.0
.....
o
I'-
iii
....
'"
N
o
.....
.,;
..,
'"
'"
o
M
'"
'"
.n
....
o
o
It)
r-..:
ll)
CO
cD
.....
.....
N
....
cO
..,
CO
ll)
..,
..;
....
I'-
N
....
o
o
o
r-..:
....
"!.
.....
.....
.....
Ul
Ql
><
lCI
I-
>.
1::
Gl
C.
o
Q:
iii
;
C
Ql
Cl
iii
'0
I-
L()
I'-
C'i
0>
L()
0>
cD
L()
N
0>
co
C'i
U)
I'-
co
co
N
~
~
r-..:
o
o
o
ci
o
N
c<i
~
N
L()
N
U)
aJ
N
0>
u)
L()
aJ
cD
o
o
a,
U)
L()
o
M
~
X
~
rJJ
Ql
ro
en
ro
u
o
...J
o
N
o
I'-
C'!
<0
(")
(")-
<0
N
(")
N
<Xi
U)
o
o
N
cD
0>
o
N
o
o
o
c::i
o
<0
c<i
<0
aJ
cD
U)
'<t
<0
co
ai
<0
o
N'
o
o
0_
o
'<t
<0
M
X
Cll
I-
~
'5
rJJ
a;
E
:J
rJJ
c:
o
t)
N
o
L()
0>
N
'<t
'<t
L()
M
o
~
L()
(")
N
<0
L()
~
'<t
cD
~
c<i
o
o
o
c::i
o
aJ
U)-
o
~
~
~
I'-
CO
N
~
L()
c<i
o
o
o
Il'i
I'-
<0
L()
X
Cll
I-
<Il
rJJ
c:
<Il
u
::J
rJJ
rJJ
CD
c:
'00
:J
CO
N
N
o
'<t
'<t
C'i
~
,
o
L()
<t_
o
~
,
<0
L()
....:
<0
~
<0
<0
'<t
c<i
L()
<0
o
o
o.
o
0>
(")
I'-
N
....:
L()
~
L()
Oi
'<t-
L()
I'-
o
o
0_
o
CO
'<t
X
Cll
I-
CD
rJJ
:E
u
c:
~
II..
'"
N
o
CO
~
~
,
<0
<0
CO
~
I'-
'<t
....:
<0
0>
0>,
::;:
~
o
o
o
c::i
o
0>_
0>
(")
....:
N
<0
CO
'<t'
'<t
~
o
o
~
o
<0
0>,
rJJ
CD
CD
II..
CD
rJJ
c:
CD
u
::J
CD
TI
:c
CD
>
is
'0
~
'<t
N
o
~
N
cD
~
'<t I'-
~ ~
co 0
as cD
~ '9
ro a;
<Xi N
'<t '<t
I'-
'<t
L()
as
N
I'-
o
o
o
c::i
o
U)_
CO
o
<Xi
U)
~
<0
(")
r-..:
aJ
0>
o
o
~
o
o
I'-
,!g
~
06
c:
.Q
1il
l:l
is
u
CD
0::
c:
o
rJJ
<Il
X
Cll
I-
U)
N
o
~
o
o
~
N
0>
aJ
c<i
<0
N
o
o
o
U)'
~
0>
~
~
0>
o
0>
ai
N
(")
o
o
~
o
'<t
U)
X
Cll
I-
CD
rJJ
c:
CD
u
::J
~
5
<0
N
o
o
0>
N
~
,
~
co
~
c<i
";-
CO
<0
o
U)
<0
aJ
o
'<t'
0>
'<t
o
o
o
Il'i
I'-
0>
o
0>
oj
I'-
<0
<0
N
r-..:
<0
L()
o
o
o
c::i
r:::.
rJJ
CD
X
Cll
l-
E
o
o
0::
a;
(5
~
06
a;
(5
I
I'-
N
o
o
~
~
,
<0
o
'<t
c::i
~
CO
'<t
cD
U)
aJ
o
N
ai
o
N'
o
o
o
L()-
I'-
L()
c<i
(")
'<t
o
<0
'<t
~
ai
(")
o
N
o
o
o
Il'i
I'-
(")
(")'
rJJ
l:l
o
o
II..
l:l
~
Cll
Co
CD
ct
rJJ
CD
X
Cll
I-
CO
N
o
(")
'<t
o
~
<0
N
Oi
N
N
~
U)
U)
'<t,
~
o
o
0_
o
U)
0>
0>
....:
<0
'<t
0>
~
~
o
o
o
c::i
0>
rJJ
CD
X
Cll
I-
a;
.<:
o
0>
N
o
CO
I'-
9
..,
..,
ll)
.n
..,
.....
,
CO
..,
;t
N
It)
.....
iii
co
.....
r-..:
.....
o
o
o
.n
o
"!.
.....
..,
CO
....
on
It)
It)
co
I'-
M
N
..,
r-..:
.....
<=>
<=>
<=>
.n
N
"!.
M
Ul
Gl
><
ell
I-
iii
u
o
...J
;
..c
o
iii
'0
I-
CO
~
C'i
<7
'"
<0
'<t
'<t'
~
,
'<t
N
<Xi
co
~
N
~
ai
N
o
o
o
c<i
'"
o
~
Lei
U)
~
(")
co
U)
c<i
'<t
o
o
~
as
N
rJJ
CD
CD
II..
~
'E
o
t)
ro
E
'c
c(
o
'"
o
N
(")
....:
<7
N
co
co
ai
o
~
,
o
L()
C'i
'<t
::;:
U)
'<to
aJ
~
U)
N
N
'<t'
N
'<t
<0
<0
<Xi
co
(")
N
'<t
'<t'
0>
N
o
o
~
N
(")
(")
rJJ
CD
CD
II..
0>
.!;
:2
':;
CO
l:l
c:
Cll
l:l
c:
Cll
...J
c;;
o
I'-
0>
<Xi
~
,
I'-
a;
ai
~
0>
~
..,f
<0
~
I'-
r-..:
N
~
U)
N
o
ai
0>
~
<0
'<t
oj
<0
0>
I'-
<0
r-..:
L()
o
o
o
r-..:
N
N
.El
'E
a;
Cl..
N
(")
o
L()
'"
q
o
N
~
~'
'"
L()
oj
'"
<t
L()
L()
c::i
N
o
o
o
N
L()
o
<0
C'i
'<t
'<t
I'-
<0
N
N
o
o
o
N'
L()
rJJ
CD
CD
II..
'<t
(")
o
~
'<t
..,f
~
o
o
C'i
~
,
0>
~
<0
'<t'
~
(")
~
,
0>
N
cD
U)
aJ
o
o
oj
N
(")
co
0_
<0
~
~
I'-
aJ
<0
U)
L()_
(")
o
o
(")
o
'<t
o
'<t
0>
(")
(")
C'i
(")
'<t
<0
'<t,
~
o
o
o
0>
aJ
I'-
c::i
~
o
o
(")
rJJ
CD
CD
II..
t::
:J
o
t)
rJJ
CD
0>
m
..c
t)
>-
c-
o
u
o
'0
.<:
Cl..
......
o
-'"
a;
(3
I'-
(")
o
CO
(")
o
N
'"
o
o
':'
r--
o
OIl
"
0..
o
;;
o
nl
"2
"51
...
:>
ai"
.II::
o
c:
nl
o
a:
....
o
>-
-
c:
::I
o
o
III
CI)
::I
c:
CI)
>
CI)
a:
co en
::10
t)~
<(N
"'Co
c:
nl
"'C
CI)
-a;-g
Cl"t:l
"'C C
::IW
lD"t:I
'to- .2
o t
-II..
;J::
E C
CI) 0
-~
nl
-co
C1)0
CI) GI
> .s
+= ...
nl 0
Iou..
Co
E
o
o
'"
o
o
N :::E
::;
~ ~
00
GO
III ...
III 0 ....
:l III
C ?fl. OJ
~ I'll -g
&! :G IlJ
...
III
GI
~
C
~
:l
(.)
III ...
III 0 ....
:l III
C rfl. OJ
~ III -g
&!:G1lJ
III
U
C
III
';::
III
>
...
o
~
III
jij
:l
ti
<(
III
III
:l
C
GI
>
GI
0::
....
GI
Cl
"t:I
:l
IlJ
III
GI
:l
C
GI
>
GI
0::
Gi
Cl
"t:I
:l
IlJ
,...
co
N
~
lD
,...
t-:.
...
..,
";"
N
N
cD
lD
lD
..,
...
cO
,...
..,
lD
o
...
N
N
,...
M
M
iii
en
M
N
en
en
...
lD
en
co
N
o
'"
lD
III
GI
III
C
GI
U
:J
"t:I
C
I'll
III
GI
GI
u..
i
.E
...
GI
II..
jij
'0
I-
'<t
N
'"
N
'<t ..,
U1; ~
cD cO
00 co
o 0
'" M
r-: ,..:
<0 lD
,...
<0
0>
cO
L()
'<t
o
o
o
N
00
<0
o
'<t
ci
L()
'"
N
'<t
N-
,...
'"
o
o
o
ai
'"
,...
1Il
~
.a
~
o
LL
"0
C
ell
1Il
OJ
C
u:
0>
'"
o
..,
N
M
N
,...
lD
en
cO
'"
..,
o
o
o
N-
co
lD
o
..,
c:i
'"
M
N
..,
N
,...
M
o
o
o
en
M
,...
III
~
.a
~
o
u..
"t:I
C
I'll
III
GI
C
u::
jij
"0
I-
0>
'<t
r-:
"'i
'"
j:::
r-:
,...
"'i
'"
00
N
L()
<0
o
'"
cO
N
L()
o
o
o
o
o
0_
o
'"
o
o
...
0>
...
o
cD
o
0_
o
o
o
ci
o
~
>-
OJ
c:
o
::;;:
'0
OJ
1Il
=>
E
.g
1Il
OJ
:::l
c:
OJ
>
OJ
0::
o
'<t
o
'<t
'<t
cf
<0
0>
...
,
00
~
...
L()
'"
L()
00
N
o
o
L()
ll"i
L()
'<l:
L()
L()
o
L()
o
C'i
o
o
L()
ll"i
>-
1::
OJ
0-
e
0...
'0
OJ
1Il
=>
E
o
Lt
1Il
OJ
:::l
c:
OJ
>
OJ
0::
~
o
lD
M
,..:
..,
en
o
en
...:
I"-
..,
M
co
N
'"
o
lD
"':
...
M
'"
o
o
'"
.n
o
q
lD
M
c:i
o
...
en
lD
o
en
o
q
o
o
'"
.n
o
q
~
GI
Q,
o
...
II..
"t:I
C
I'll
>-
GI
c:
o
~
...
o
III
III
=>
jij
'0
I-
00
0>
cO
L()
'"
00
cD
L()
'"
<0
<0
'"
I"-
o
o
'<t
1"-'
'"
N
N'
o
o
'<t,
I"-
'"
o
C'i
N
00
'"
<0
L()
<0
L()
ci
00
co_
o
o
0>
cD
'<t
0>
N'
1Il
~
'~
OJ
(fJ
...
.E
1Il
Q)
OJ
ro
.c
()
N
'<t
o
N
~
...
,
00
'"
...
,
<0
'"
cO
'"
L()
N
'<t
",'
o
o
o
ll"i
'"
L()
I"-
cO
'"
'"
<0
L()
C'i
...
o
o
o
ll"i
'"
1Il
OJ
'-'
-:;:
OJ
(fJ
,S2
:0
:::l
0...
...
.E
1Il
Q)
~
ell
.c
()
00
'<t
o
M
co
cO
...
,...
en
lD
cO
'"
M
lD
N
M
,...
..,
N
co
o
'"
N
N
o
o
..,
N
I"-
o
M
N
'"
M
lD
co
N
...
..;
en
~
o
o
en.
...
co
en
N
III
III
U
'~
III
III
...
o
...
III
GI
Cl
...
I'll
J::
(.)
jij
'0
I-
N
L()
ci
0>
~
0>
ci
'<t
...
o
L()
r-:
00
o
N
<0
cD
0>
N
o
o
o
ai
'"
'"
0>
I"-
o.ci
'<t
0>
00
<0
ll"i
L()
o
o
o
ci
'<t
'"
E
OJ
ro
(fJ
1Il
E
ell
S,
e
0...
"0
~
ell
.c
(fJ
..6
E
'w
0::
o
L()
o
L()
...
'"
...
...
'<t
c;
ci
o
...
00
~
...
...
...
<0
o
'<t
cO
00
...
o
o
'<t
cO
<0
...
I"-
~
...
I"-
...
N
0>
'"
cO
00
o
o
'<t_
...
'"
OJ
:::l
c:
OJ
>
OJ
0::
1Il
:::l
o
OJ
c:
El
Cii
'-'
1Il
~
...
L()
o
'"
'<t
o.ci
...
'"
N.
...
...
<0
L()
ai
...
o
I"-
00
C'i
00
o
o
0>,
00
N
'<t
<0
'<t
to
...
I"-
L()
<0
N
I"-
o
o
'<t_
...
'<t
'<t
1Il
Cil
o
()
"0
~
OJ
>
o
'-'
OJ
0::
<0
L()
o
...
lD
en
,...
en
'"
...
N
'"
N
lD
,...
c:i
lD
lD
en
co
cO
lD
'"
o
o
M
cO
M
en
M
o
cO
M
,...
M
,...
cO
...
M
o
o
co
N
M
co
III
:l
o
GI
c:
..!!!
Qj
U
III
:i
jij
'0
I-
...
~
~
I"-
'<t
...
'<t-
L()
u;>
I"-
'<t
N
'9
o
N
'<t-
L()
'"
o
o
L(),
0>
N
"'i
I"-
...
'<i
N
'<t
I"-
L()
'"
cO
o
0>
N
L()
...
'<t-
N
"0
<i:
ro
'-'
.~
OJ
OJ
iti
Y
c
o
Z
o
<0
o
00
...
'<t
00
L()
C'i
'<t
0>
o
N
I"-
...
'"
L()
N
'<t
I"-
C'i
'<t
I"-
"'!
...
0>
...
ll"i
N
0>
ci
I"-
00
'<t
0>
cO
0>
<0
C'i
N
L()
00
ll"i
N
ll"i
1Il
OJ
1Il
C
OJ
0-
X
W
"0
~
ell
.c
(fJ
...
<0
o
L()
L()
cO
...
,
'<t
o
o
C'i
I"-
'T'
'"
00
'"
<0
...
00
<0
I"-
L()'
L()
0>
N
00
00
...
'<t-
o
00_
'"
...
c;
N
N
l"-
I"-
cO
N
<0
C'i
00
00
...
..,f
o
00,
OJ
OJ
iti
Y
1Il
OJ
"~
OJ
(fJ
ro
'(3
o
(fJ
06
~
~
Cii
~
'<t
<0
o
~
"'l'
'<t
o
0>
ll"i
u;>
o
o
o.ci
L()
N
N
'"
",'
N.
o
00
0>
ll"i
o
N
N'
o
0>
ci
L()
<0
N
N
ai
<0
"'!
'"
I"-
'<t
C'i
0>
'<t
N
"0
<i:
ro
'-'
.~
OJ
OJ
iti
()
OJ
iti
U5
Q;
.c
o
'"
I"-
o
'<t
~
...
'"
N
0>
0>
I"-
cD
L()
0>
o
~
...
'<t
I"-
~
0>'
<0
"',
o
o
o
ci
'<t
'"
",'
L()
'"
N
...
I"-
u:;
N
~
o
o
o
ci
'<t
'"
C'i
1Il
OJ
'-'
'~
OJ
(fJ
ro
'(3
o
(fJ
06
~
~
Cii
~
o
00
o
'<t
'"
r-:
'9
00
I"-
0>
cO
'9
o
o
ci
0>
0>
00
N'
...
o
'"
0>
ci
L()
...
<0
I"-
00_
...
o
o
o
L()
1"--
<0
"0
<i:
ro
'-'
"5
OJ
OJ
iti
()
Q;
.c
o
<0
00
o
...
,...
<?
...
'"
"!.
...
I"-
'?
lD
lD
en
,...
lD
..,
o
cO
..,
lD
en
N
..,
en.
...
...
...
N
...
co
N
cD
I"-
,...
en
lD
en
...
o
o
...
'"
lD
...
.n
M
...
M
...
GI
:l
C
GI
>
GI
0::
jij
...
III
"t:I
III
u..
"t:I
C
I'll
.s
I'll
Cil
iii
"0
I-
o
o
ci
o
o
c:i
o
o
o
o
ci
o
o
c:i
o
o
'"
'"
<0,
'"
'"
'<t
ci
N
M
M
lD
M
M
..,
o
N
o
o
ci
o
o
c:i
o
o
N
L()
<0
..,f
'<t
'"
N
N
N
'"
lD
..;
..,
M
N
N
1Il
OJ
~
:::l
o
(fJ
OJ
C
"(3
c
l'Cl
c
u::
Q;
.c
o
III
III
U
...
:l
o
III
Cl
c
'u
C
I'll
C
u::
...
III
J::
(5
jij
'0
I-
N
0>
o
'"
0
0 Gl CO CO to
l::' 0 (j) '" C>
r-- C r-.: r-: .,;
'" .!!! l- I""-
~ (") M
" " ~ ~
00 '" ...
'"
c.. 0 0
~
0
CO CO C>
V ., CO
1-. 1""-. CO
~ :; .0
It)
III N N I""-
iii ~ ~ iii
.a
0
<(
III ...
Gl 0 -
:I ~ Gl
C Cl 0 0
0 "C CO I""-
Gl CO
> I'll :I cO a:i M
Gl III III (j) '" N
D:: I'll V
1/1 N N M
III l- I""- M
III Gl ~ It) CO
~ .. :I CJ'> .,; iii
&:: l'lI C V ., to
III ::. Gl ll) Itl "1
> > ~ ~ ...
III Gl CO
0: D::
Iii '"
~ 0
- CO
u ~
<( <D to l""-
.!!! N 0 0 CO
&:: ~ 0 0 0 M.
&:: ll"i lI'i ...
Cl III Qj 0 0 .,
.. Cl <D '" C>
:> ~ "C .,- ~ N
III :I '"
oi - "C III ...
III Gl
..llC Cl"C
0 ~ c
r:: ~ w
III m "C
0 .... .2 III ...
0: 0 ~ Gl 0 Qj 0 0 Itl
.... - 0.. :I ~ 0 0 .,
0 &:: C Cl c:i c:i c:i
..c: 0 "C
III Gl I'll 0 0 .,
~ E C > :I ~
Gl III III
r:: III 0 D:: I'll
~ - :E
0 III
- CO
U en 0 v ., M
III Gl N N It)
> :; III co_ co '"
~ Gl l- I""-" r-:
III 0 .. :I 0 0 C>
.. LL l'lI C (") M to
III ~ Gl ~
Q. > l""-
E .. Gl
D::
0 0
..
U 0..
v ., 0
N N M
co co ...
1-- r-: .,;
Qj 0 0 to
(") M v
Cl ~
"C
:I co
III ...
.- ','.
: ~tl~J
~
.IE
lJl
c:
ell t!!
t= oS! III
'" III iii
g c '0
N ~ I'll
~ I-
::; "C
:A '" iii c
~ '0 I'll
0 0 (") l;
..J 0 (j) I-
0 0
COMMEMORATING THE 50th ANNIVERSARY OF lIT NIGHT VISION AND
PROCLAIMING MARCH 17, 2009, AS lIT NIGHT VISION DAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, ITT's military avionics systems and radar components plant opened for
business in 1959 and has been located in Roanoke County for 50 years; and
WHEREAS, lIT, based in Roanoke, is the world's leading developer, producer and supplier
of Generation 3 image intensification technology for U.S. and allied military
forces as well as federal, state and local law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, ITT's Roanoke manufacturing plant began with 54 employees and has grown to
1,509 highly skilled, technology workers in 2009; and
WHEREAS, Night vision production came to the Roanoke plant in 1962 and in 1973, Roanoke
County became the headquarters for a new operating division formed by ITT
Corporation-lIT Electro-Optical Products Division (EOPD); and
WHEREAS, In December of 1995, the Roanoke division's name was changed from lIT
Electro-Optical Products Division to lIT Night Vision; and
WHEREAS, ITTNV made a capital investment that exceeded $46 million in 2005, created 489
new jobs and renovated and expanded their Roanoke county facility which now
totals 285,000 square feet of manufacturing and administrative space; and
WHEREAS, for the last five years 2004-2008 inclusive, IITNV has received a total of $2.7
billion in orders of their night vision equipment; and
WHEREAS, ITTNV strives for excellence as noted by the 2006 High Tech Manufacturing
Award Winner from the NewVA Corridor Technology Council and remains
committed to the community by sponsorships such as the Blue Ridge PBS
KidsFestj and
WHEREAS, ITT Night Vision is part of lIT Corporation, a Fortune 300 company, which has
been named to Forbes.com's list of "America's Best Managed Companies" for
2008, and awarded the company the top spot in the conglomerates category.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby
issue this proclamation to commemorate the 50th ANNIVERSARY OF lIT NIGHT
VISION; and
FURTHER, THE Board of Supervisors proclaims Tuesday, March 17,2009, as lIT Night Vision
Day in Roanoke County, extends congratulations to ITT Night Vision for its
extraordinary success, and expresses deep appreciation for the company's
many contributions to the community, the local economy and our citizens.
Intdw/ ?1-. ~
Michael W. Altizer, Cha rman
/~ /n ~~;..-
~ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. .-
County Administrator
~ \ <)....-9 (. ~ a.i ....
Richard C. Flora
(l/Jo.ddn. a m~
Charlotte A. Moore
fV-rL~
r
Q1ount~ of ~oanokc
ttO'~~~lttial1
~. .,.
I- ;0
Z Cl
~
21;
DECLARING THE WEEK OF MARCH 8, 2009 AS
GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
WHEREAS, March 12, 2007, marks the 97th anniversary of Girl Scouts ofthe USA, founded
by Juliette Gordon Low in 1912 in Savannah, Georgia; and
WHEREAS, throughout its distinguished history, Girl Scouting has helped build millions of
girls and women of courage, confidence, and character; and
WHEREAS, through the dedication, time, and talent of volunteers of different backgrounds,
abilities, and areas of expertise, the Girl Scout organization thrives for girls in
many settings; and
WHEREAS, through Girl Scouting's unique leadership development program, girls define
leadership by making the world a better place by discovering, connecting, and
taking action in their communities; and
WHEREAS, Girl Scouting takes an active role in increasing girls' awareness of the
opportunities available to them in math, science, sports, technology, health
and fields that can expand their horizons; and
WHEREAS, more than 3.7 million Girl Scout members nationwide will be celebrating 96
years of this American tradition, with nearly 50 million women who grew up
participating in Girl Scouting and exemplify the impact of this amazing
Movement.
NOW THEREFORE, WE, Michael W. Altizer, Chairman, and Charlotte A. Moore, Supervisor for
the Cave Spring Magisterial District, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors and
citizens of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of March 8,
2009 as GIRL SCOUT WEEK in the County of Roanoke; and
FURTHER, We commend the Girls Scouts for their commitment on "behalf of America's
girls, and express our congratulations to the Girls Scouts upon their 97th
anniversary.
/.-I!- )?1 a~/
~ohn M. Chambliss, Jr.
County Administrator
/huw 71. ~
Michael W. Altizer, C airman
(!jJw..Idn a m~
Charlotte A. Moore
Cave Spring Magisterial District
}J-1
\"..
IL--
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
/r-l
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24. 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Work Session for the Budget for Fiscal Year 2009-2010
SUBMITTED BY:
B. Clayton Goodman,lIl
County Administrator
COllNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside to present any updated information received regarding the
state's budget and discuss the County's budget for the next fiscal year.
Q
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2009
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
1<- 1
---
PETITIONER:
CASE NUMBER:
Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
27 - 12/2008
Board of Supervisors Consent 1st Reading Date: November 11, 2008
Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 3, 2009
Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2nd Reading Date: March 24, 2009
A. REQUEST
Rezone approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District,
to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions
(approximately 12.4 acres), and C-2C, General Commercial District with
Conditions (approximately 3.9 acres) and to rezone approximately 11.2 acres from
C-2, General Commercial District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family
Residential District with Conditions, for the purpose of constructing a mixed-use
development consisting of an apartment complex (approximately 23.6 acres) and
commercial uses (approximately 7.8 acres)
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Eight citizens spoke in opposition to the request. Key issues emphasized by the
speakers were stormwater runoff, exterior lighting installation heights and intensity,
volume of crashes in the vicinity of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road, traffic
generated by the new Public Safety Center, pressure on the local road network
when problems occur on Interstate 81, vehicular stacking in the Cove Road left
turn lane onto Route 419 southbound, responsibility for "level of service"
improvements, indirect negative traffic impacts at the southern intersection of
Cove Road and Green Ridge Road, increased traffic impacts on the local road
network after the multi-generational recreation facility opens, advancing
commercial zoning northeast along Cove Road, screening and buffering at the
extreme southern tip of the proposed project and concerns regarding the
background investigations of potential renters.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Timothy Beard presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker inquired about recreational
amenities planned for the development and the existing level of service at the
Route 419 eastbound turn lane onto Cove Road. John Houchin, Edward Rose
construction representative, stated that likely apartment size breakdown would be
33 - 35 percent one-bedroom, 50 - 55 percent two-bedroom and 12 -15 percent
three-bedroom units. Passive recreation activities such as walking trails and
fishing from stormwater detention areas are possible in addition to the clubhouse,
swimming pool and other outdoor items appearing on the concept plan.
Consulting traffic engineer, Paul Anderson, noted eight locations in the vicinity
where traffic counts were taken, that the minimally acceptable level of service is
"0" (high-density flow where speed and freedom to maneuver are severely
restricted and comfort and convenience have declined while flow remains stable),
that a right turn lane onto Route 419 from Cove Road could benefit up to 90
percent of vehicles navigating their way through this intersection and such an
improvement should be constructed simultaneously with the start of development.
Mr. Jarrell asked about the site's proximity to available emergency services, the
potential use of corporate or short-term apartment leases by the developer,
background checks for sublease situations and the extensive wording of the
petitioner's proposed proffered condition pertaining to Cove Road - Route 419
turn lane construction. The development would be served by Masons Cove and
Hollins Fire and Rescue Departments. The applicant typically rents less than 10
percent of apartment units on a corporate basis. The detailed wording regarding a
proposed right turn lane proffer was intended to provide the developer with limits
on materials prices and timing of contractors' work so as to coincide with
construction occurring on the subject property. Mr. Jarrell also inquired about the
potential for damage to downstream wells and septic fields due to this project. Mr.
Azar inquired as to square footages of signs, particularly for potential commercial
buildings and kinds of lighting those signs may display. Mr. Azar also asked about
trash dumpsters, construction timing of the recommended Cove Road right turn
lane onto Route 419 and leasing periods. The developer proffered limited sign
area for apartment identification, but chose to keep all of its options open for future
commercial signage (zoned C-2). Mr. Houchin replied that a centralized
compactor will be utilized for trash within the apartment complex and that short-
term conference/training may occur (corporate basis noted above). Mr. Radford
inquired as to the proposed build-out scenario for the project and if any "green"
concepts would be utilized, particularly in regard to outside lighting. Apartments
would be built first over a two-year period starting in 2010. No active marketing
campaign for commercial sites has begun. No specific "green" concepts are
involved - the applicant committed to full compliance with all zoning ordinance
regulations relative to exterior lighting. Mr. McNeil asked for a summary of all uses
suggested by the petitioner for the proposed C-2 portion of the overall site which
would require approval of a Special Use Permit (Adult Care Residences, Life Care
Facility, Nursing Home, Religious Assembly and Mini-warehouse) and if Cove
Road or Route 419 appear on the Virginia Department of Transportation's Six-
Year Improvement Plan. Neither road is scheduled for work per VDOT engineer,
Scott Woodrum. Ms. Hooker and Mr. Radford each reiterated their concerns with
possible grading to be done along the curve on Cove Road near the Green Ridge
Road intersection, fair housing standards and background checks for potential
apartment residents.
D. CONDITIONS
1. The property will be developed substantially in accord with the Edward Rose
Properties, Inc., concept plan dated October 3,2008, subject to any changes
required by Roanoke County during development plan review.
2. As to the 23.6 acres to be rezoned to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District, the
property will be used only for Residential Uses, Multi-Family Dwelling.
3. As to the 7.8 acres to be rezoned to C-2, general Commercial District, the
property will be used only for one or more of the following purposes:
Residential Uses: Accessory Apartment, Home Occupation-Type 1, Multi-
Family Dwelling.
Civic Uses: Administrative Services, Clubs, Cultural Services, Day Care
Center, Educational Facilities - Primary/Secondary, Guidance Services,
Post Office, Public Assembly, Public Parks and Recreational Areas,
Safety Services, Adult Care Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing Home,
Religious Assembly.
Office Uses: Financial Institutions, General Office, Medical Office,
Laboratories.
Commercial uses: Antique Shops, Bed and Breakfast, Business Support
Services, Business or Trade Schools, Commercial Indoor Entertainment,
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation, Communications Services,
Construction Sales and Services, Consumer Repair Services, Hospital,
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge, Personal Improvement Services, Personal
Services, Restaurant - General, Retail Sales, Studio - Fine Arts,
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic, Mini-warehouses.
4. The exterior design of commercial buildings to be located on 7.8 acres to be
rezoned C-2 will be consistent with the exterior design of multi-family dwellings
to be located on 23.6 acres to be rezoned R-3.
5. The required buffer yard along the eastern boundary of the property, between
the area to be rezoned R-3 and the single family residences zoned R-2 to the
east, will be landscaped at the Type B, Option 1 or 2 level per zoning
ordinance Section 30-92-6(A) in effect on this application date.
6. The exterior appearance of multi-family dwellings to be constructed on the
property will be substantially in accord with drawings attached to this Proffer of
Conditions.
7. Apartment complex identification signage shall be limited to one maximum 30
square-foot monument sign located at/near each of the two proposed vehicular
access points on Cove Road.
E. COMMISSION ACTION
Ms. Hooker made a motion to recommend denial of the request with proffered
conditions. The motion carried 3 - 2.
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
Mr. McNeil and Mr. Radford voted to approve the request.
G. ATTACHMENTS:
_ Concept Plan
_ Staff Report
_Vicinity Map
Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
FIRST AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
Address of Subject Properties: Multiple, including 6356 Cove Road, NW
Tax Map Numbers: 036.11-02-01.01; 036.11-02-01.00; 036.11-02-02.00; 036.11-02-03.00;
036.11-02-04.00; and 036.11-02-36.00
Present Zoning: R-2 and C-2
Proposed Zoning: R-3 and C-2
Applicant: Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
Property Owners:
Melvin L. and Pauline J. Ronk (036.11-02-01.01)
Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC (036.11-02-01.00, 036.11-02-02.00,
and 036.11-02-01.00)
Baldwin-Swift Properties LLC (036.11-02-04.00)
Estelle H. Ronk, Lowell E. Bower, Eileen B. Edwards and Alan A.
Huffman, Trustee (036.11-02-36.00)
Proffers
1. The property will be developed substantially in accord with the Edward Rose Properties,
Inc. concept plan dated October 3,2008, subject to any changes required by Roanoke
County during development plan review.
2. As to the 23.6 acres to be rezoned to R-3 Multi-Family Residential District, the property
will be used only for Residential Uses, Multi-Family Dwelling.
3. As to the 7.8 acres to be rezoned C-2, General Commercial District, the property will be
used only for one or more of the following purposes:
Residential Uses: Accessory Apartment, Home Occupation-Type I, Multi-Family
Dwelling.
Civic Uses: Administrative Services, Clubs, Cultural Services, Day Care Center,
Educational Facilities - CollegelUniversity, Educational Facilities - Primary/Secondary,
Guidance Services, Post Office, Public Assembly, Public Parks and Recreational Areas,
Safety Services, Adult Care Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing Home, Religious
Assembly.
Office Uses: Financial Institutions, General Office, Medical Office, Laboratories.
Commercial Uses: Antique Shops, Bed and Breakfast, Business Support
Services, Business or Trade Schools, Commercial Indoor Entertainment, Commercial
Indoor Sports and Recreation, Communications Services, Construction Sales and
Services, Consumer Repair Services, Hospital, Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge, Personal
Improvement Services, Personal Services, Restaurant - General, Retail Sales, Studio -
Fine Arts, Veterinary HospitaVClinic, Mini-warehouses.
4. The exterior design of the commercial buildings to be located on the 7.8 acres to be
zoned C-2 will be consistent with the exterior design ofthe multi-family dwellings to be
located on the 23.6 acres to be zoned R-3.
5. The required buffer yard along the eastern boundary of the property, between the area to
be zoned R-3 and the single-family residences in the areas zoned R-I and R-2 to the east,
will be landscaped at the Type B, Option 1 or 2 level, as Type B is prescribed in Section
30-92-6(A) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as in effect on the date of this
Proffer of Conditions.
6. The exterior appearance of the multi-family dwellings to be constructed on the property
will be substantially in accord with the drawings dated February 25,2009, and attached to
this Proffer of Conditions.
7. Apartment complex identification signage shall be limited to one maximum 30-square
foot monument sign located at/near each of the two proposed vehicular access points on
Cove Road, and those signs shall be no taller than six (6) feet.
8. Any free-standing (pylon or monument) commercial site identification sign shall be no
taller than eight (8) feet and no larger than seventy-five (75) square feet, and shall be
placed within seventy-five (75) feet ofthe southernmost vehicular access point onto Cove
Road.
9. The poles carrying lighting for the commercial area shall be a maximum of fifteen (15)
feet in height, and the light fixtures shall be directed downward.
10. The poles carrying lighting for the multi-family development shall be a maximum of
fifteen (15) feet in height, and the light fixtures shall be shielded and/or directed
downward.
11. The applicant will construct a right-turn lane on Cove Road, at the intersection of Route
419 and Cove Road, as permitted by VDOT, that is approximately 200 feet in length with
a ISO-foot taper, in accordance with VDOT standards and specifications for an urban
collector road.
Dated this i "8"1l.. day of ~ , 2009
~Kdc
2
{#1185277-1, 109694-00001-01}
:~~LC
, Manager
E
By
3
{#1185277-1, 109694-00001-01}
Estelle H. Ronk
Lowell E. Bower
Eileen B. Edwards
Alan A. Huffman, Trustee
Baldwin-Swift Properties LLC
By
Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC
By
By
Ed~a~d Rose Properties, Inc.
ByC/(~ ~.~
3
{#1l85277-1,I09694-00001-01}
, Manager
, Manager
, Manager
,~nT
"1--
..............
-oQ.)
ca..
ro~
(0 --
CJ)
0>
.~
-0
::J
(l)
$
Q.)
:>
+""
C
o
I....
u..
o
E
<If
(f)Q)
ct
Q)Q)
~ 2~
roD-D
g-Q)N
-g ~~-
on:: >-
D:::"2ro
Q)ro"
>:;;:~
8~~
00 .-
"'ON
CQ.)
roo..
I'--~
---
L{)
('i')
CJ)
0>
.~
"'0
::J
(l)
c
o
:;::;
ro
>
Q.)
W
I....
ro
Q.)
0:::
o
c
(/) gf
ct
QJQJ
E eLm
t2a
roD-D
g-Q)N
-g ~~-
on:: >-
n::-o~
~ro
QJro"
>:;;:~
8~~
...;:t .-
('i')
"'OQ.)
Ca..
ro>>
,1 .......1-
00"-'
1 D 0>
.1 oli C
~ "'0
D' ::J
(l)
, C
r 0
+""
ro
I >
. IJ Q.)
w
l I....
ro
Q.)
t 0:::
, ~1
l I'
I
nl
I.
I,
~
(,
r
I~
~ (j'r
,
o
c
<If
(f)Q)
ct
Q)Q)
E "-m
t2a
roD-D
"- N
~ ~L()-
~n::~
D:::"2ro
Q)cu2
>,,-"
0-0 Q)
OWLL
Petitioner:
Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
Request:
Rezone approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to
R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions
(approximately 12.4 acres), and C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions
(approximately 3.9 acres) and to rezone approximately 11.2 acres from C-2 General
Commercial District, to R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with
Conditions for the purpose of constructing a mixed-use development consisting of
an apartment complex (approximately 23.6 acres) and commercial uses
(approximately 7.8 acres)
Location:
6200 Block and 6300 Blocks of Cove Road and Green Ridge Road
Magisterial District:
Catawba
Proffered
Conditions:
1. The property will be developed substantially in accord with the Edward
Rose Properties, Inc., concept plan dated October 3, 2008, subject to any
changes required by Roanoke County during development plan review.
2. As to the 23.6 acres to be rezoned to R-3 Multi-Family Residential District,
the property will be used only for Residential Uses, Multi-Family Dwelling.
3. As to the 7.8 acres to be rezoned to C-2, General Commercial District, the
property will be used only for one or more of the following purposes:
Residential Uses: Accessory Apartment, Home Occupation-Type 1,
Multi-Family Dwelling.
Civic Uses: Administrative Services, Clubs, Cultural Services, Day Care
Center, Educational Facilities - Primary/Secondary, Guidance Services,
Post Office, Public Assembly, Public Parks and Recreational Areas,
Safety Services, Adult Care Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing
Home, Religious Assembly.
Office Uses: Financial Institutions, General Office, Medical Office,
Laboratories.
Commercial Uses: Antique Shops, Bed and Breakfast, Business Support
Services, Business or Trade Schools, Commercial Indoor Entertainment,
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation, Communications Services,
Construction Sales and Services, Consumer Repair Services, Hospital,
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge, Personal Improvement Services, Personal
Services, Restaurant - General, Retail Sales, Studio - Fine Arts,
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic, Mini - warehouses.
4. The exterior design of commercial buildings to be located on 7.8 acres to
be rezoned C-2 will be consistent with the exterior design of multi-family
dwellings to be located on 23.6 acres to be rezoned R-3.
5. The required buffer yard along the eastern boundary of the property,
between the area to be rezoned R-3 and the single family residences zoned
R-2 to the east, will be landscaped at the Type B, Option 1 or 2 level per
zoning ordinance Section 30-92-6(A) in effect on this application date.
6. The exterior appearance of multi-family dwellings to be constructed on the
property will be substantially in accord with drawings attached to this
Proffer of Conditions.
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The petitioner, Edward Rose Properties, Inc., proposes to rezone approximately 16.3 acres from R-2, Medium
Density Residential District, and 11.2 acres of C-2, General Commercial District to R-3C, Medium Density
Residential District, with Conditions, and to C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions, in order to construct
a mixed-use residential and commercial project. Approximately four acres of the overall site is already zoned
appropriately (C-2) for the use type and building configuration indicated on the applicant's concept plan. The total
acreage included within the proposal's boundaries is 31.4 acres. Architectural renderings have been submitted in
regard to building height and detail. The petitioner has stated its intent to apply deed restrictions insuring that
residential and commercial buildings are generally consistent with each other in design and construction. Among
potential uses suggested by the applicant for the two commercial buildings onsite are hotel and restaurant, assisted
living, daycare and general offices. The applicant has proffered commercial uses within the range indicated on
page 1.
The proposal's potential (at complete build-out) to generate 5,000, or more, vehicle trips per day or a minimum of
250 peak hour trips necessitated the production of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) per Virginia Department of
Transportation regulations. Revisions to the original TIA were submitted and commented on by VDOT and Roanoke
County staff.
The site is designated Transition and Core by the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The project
conforms with policies of each of these designations accompanied by proffered conditions listed above.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Roanoke County site plan review will be conducted.
Commercial entrance permit(s) from the Virginia Department of Transportation will be required.
Virginia Erosion & Sediment Control regulations provide for protection of land and waterways downstream
from development sites. Roanoke County drainage regulations require onsite detention of stormwater at
pre-development rates.
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Backqround - Edward Rose Properties, Inc., is the contract purchaser of 31.4 total acres currently
composed of six separate tracts owned by four different owners that is the subject of this request. The
overall site contains three homes, each with a private driveway. The houses would be demolished. Two of
the driveway locations with intersections on Cove Road would be upgraded and extended. A 15.094 acre
portion of the largest of the six tracts (27.372 acres) is subject to purchase pending rezoning. The
remaining 12.278 acres is not part of this petition and would remain C-2, General Commercial District. All of
the other five parcels comprise the remaining acreage of the rezoning request. Existing R-2, Medium
Density Residential zoning (roughly forming the northern half of the site) reflects the opportunity for
alternative housing where single family residential neighborhoods can be buffered as adjoining infill
development occurs. Existing C-2, General Commercial zoning would not permit commercial buildings as
far north along Cove Road as the extent requested by this petition.
Topoqraphv/Veqetation - The overall site varies tremendously in elevation from nearly 1,250 feet near its
northern extent to a low of approximately 1,120 feet along the seasonal stream (a tributary of Peters Creek)
found at the southern tip of the site. Vegetation on the 31.4 acre combination of parcels includes scattered
2
evergreen trees along the west and northwest perimeter and within the north central interior of the project.
Dense hardwood stands occur along the northeast border and the north central interior. Deciduous trees
are also found along the west border and south of existing houses on Cove Road. Most of the southern
portion of the property is a fertile grassland historically used for hay production. Stretching virtually the
entire length of the project site north-to-south is an Appalachian Power 69 kilovolt power line and its
accompanying 60-foot wide right-of-way.
Surroundinq Neiqhborhood - The subject tracts are bounded by R-1, Low Density Residential District, and
R-2, Medium Density Residential District, properties on the east and north. Significant portions of land
adjoining on the east are used agriculturally. Most of the remaining residentially zoned land in the vicinity is
occupied by established single family residences. Interstate 81 right-of-way, access ramps and travel lanes
are found northwest of the site. Property southwest of the proposed project zoned C-2, General
Commercial District, is used agriculturally and forms a portion of the southernmost parcel of the overall
project area. Further southwest across Route 419 are commercially used tracts within the City of Salem.
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture - The Edward Rose Properties, Inc., concept plan proposes 12 separate apartment
buildings containing 252 dwelling units (a density of 10.68 units per acre within the projected multi-family
residential portion of the overall site), a management office and clubhouse. Additionally, two future
commercial buildings are indicated, but will not be constructed by the petitioner. Pad sites for commercial
structures are shown on both sides of the west vehicular access on Cove Road approximately 1,100 feet
north of the Electric Road (Route 419) - Cove Road (VA 780) intersection. Potential commercial structure
footprints (single story) vary from 19,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Commercial building heights
are not addressed - the C-2 General Commercial District height is unlimited unless adjoining low and
medium density residential property. Among possible uses suggested for these structures are general
office, day care, assisted living, hotel and restaurant. An assisted living facility would require approval of a
Special Use Permit which is not requested under this application. The multi-family buildings would not
exceed three stories or 40 feet in height and are projected to be constructed of a combination of siding,
stone and brick (please see attached renderings). Multi-family buildings proposed for the southern half of
the subject site are not easily reached with the southernmost structure positioned nearly a half-mile from the
nearest Cove Road entrance. Use and design standards for R-3 zoned multi-family dwellings require 10
percent common open space and recreational areas for parcels over five acres - totaling 2.36 acres of
amenities over residential portions of the site. A clubhouse and associated amenities are shown near the
northern tip of the property. Additional open space and recreation areas may be required.
AccessfTraffic Circulation - The overall project displays two vehicular access points onto public right-of-way
(Cove Road), both proposed in the northern one-third of the site. Commercial sites and seven of the twelve
proposed apartment buildings are easily reached per the circulation pattern shown on the concept plan.
Apartment structures numbered 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 are less accessible. A 24-foot wide two-way traffic aisle
is indicated throughout proposed residentially-zoned portions of the site. The entry road bisecting proposed
commercial buildings would exceed 30 feet in width leading to individual parking lots for each of those
structures. After passing those interior commercial access points, the road narrows to 24 feet as it extends
to residential parking areas. The concept plan indicates approximately 500 parking spaces designed for
apartment use. Minimum parking required by the ordinance for the multi-family portion of the project would
be 460 parking spaces.
VDOT's general review indicated that the posted speed limit on this segment of Cove Road is 40 miles per
Hour and the minimum required intersection sight distance is 445 feet. Per VDOT staff, "based on the
approximate intersection locations in the concept plan, sight distance at the first entrance traveling east on
3
Cove Road from Electric Road appears to be adequate looking left, but may be inadequate looking to the
right. Sight distance at the second entrance traveling east on Cove Road from Electric Road appears to be
adequate looking to the right, but may be inadequate looking to the left. Left and right turn lane warrant
analyses may be requested during the site plan review stage. This will depend on, but is not limited to,
projected traffic generated by the site, existing traffic on Cove Road and accident history adjacent to the
site." Data supplied by VDOT through the applicant's traffic engineering consultant Hayes Seay Mattern &
Mattern - Architecture Engineering Construction Management (HSMM AECOM) indicate that from May 1,
2005 through April 30, 2008, seven crashes occurred at Electric Road's intersection with the south-bound
Interstate 81 ramp, one crash occurred at Electric Road's intersection with the north-bound Interstate 81
ramp, five crashes occurred at the Electric Road - Cove Road intersection and no crashes occurred at the
Cove Road - Green Ridge Road intersection immediately north of the project site. 2007 Annual Average
Daily Traffic volume estimates indicated 14,000 vehicle trips occurred on this northern segment of Route
419. Volume estimates indicated 3,600 trips on Cove Road and 1,900 trips on Green Ridge Road.
Traffic Impact Analysis & Review - VDOT's review of the first Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by HSMM
AECOM found inadequacies related to such items as peak hour trip generation, traffic volume data and type
of vehicle discrepancies, signal warrants analysis and modeling. The TIA included a proposed development
description, discussion of existing and projected volumes in the study area and traffic operations analysis.
The study assumed the construction of the 252 unit apartment complex, a 150 room hotel, a 200 bed
assisted living facility, daycare, restaurant and offices. Quoting the study's executive summary, "there will
be two full-access entrances along Cove Road. The proposed entrance to the west of Green Ridge Road
will have an eastbound full width right turn lane with taper. All of the proposed land uses are acceptable
under this (proposed C-2 General Commercial) zoning. The study area consists of three signalized
intersections and five unsignalized intersections. The proposed project will be completed in one phase by
2013. Design year 2015 will also be analyzed for complete development build-out - six years after the start
of development as required by Chapter 527 regulations. The signalized intersections of Route 419 with
Interstate 81 northbound ramps, 1-81 southbound ramps and Green Ridge Road are projected to operate at
an acceptable level-of-service during the build conditions of design year 2015. The westbound left-through
movement of the unsignalized intersection of Route 419 with Cove Road is projected to operate at level-of-
service F during background and build-out conditions of design year 2015 PM peak hour. The addition of a
right-turn lane for the westbound approach would help improve level-of-service for the westbound right
movement. A signal may be of benefit to this intersection, but coordination with the (existing) signal at the
intersection of Route 419 with 1-81 northbound ramps will be necessary due to the close proximity of that
intersection. The developer has not committed to fund the addition of the right-turn lane nor a signaL"
VDOT staff comments on the updated TIA included a variety of specific intersection, traffic volume and
vehicle lane storage conditions and stated "the analysis suggested a right-turn lane and signal at the
intersection of Route 419 and Cove Road. The peak hour warrant was evaluated for this intersection. A
full signal warrants study would be required prior to signalization of this intersection being recommended."
Roanoke County Transportation Engineering comments included the following: "due to additional traffic
volumes associated with this development and background growth, signal modifications may be necessary
at Interstate 81 northbound ramps/Route 419 and 1-81 southbound ramps/Route 419 to accommodate total
2013 build-out year volumes. According to the submitted analyses, the following existing storage lengths
may be exceeded during a peak hour along Route 419 in the 2013 build-out year of the development:
1-81 southbound ramps/Route 419 intersection northbound left-turn lane; 1-81 northbound ramps/Route 419
intersection westbound left-turn lane and northbound right-turn lane and through lanes; Route 419/Cove
Road intersection southbound left-turn lane. Due to poor level-of-service with extensive queuing,
consideration should be given to the addition of an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane at the Cove Road/
western site drive intersection. The internal protected stem length at the Cove Road site drive intersections
should accommodate the storage necessary for anticipated queuing before parking and crossing maneuvers
4
are allowed."
Stormwater Manaaement - A series of detention areas appear on the concept plan along eastern and
southern reaches of the overall site. No detailed stormwater engineering plans are currently available.
Final grade conditions are expected to direct runoff southward within this portion of the Peters Creek
watershed.
Public Schools - School-age children generated by this development would attend Glen Cove Elementary,
Northside Middle and Northside High Schools. As of spring 2008, Glen Cove had excess capacity and
Northside Middle and High Schools have undergone extensive recent renovations. Based on the housing
type proposed a maximum of 40-50 students could be expected at completion of the development.
Fire & Rescue/Utilities - The subject property is served by Masons Cove Fire & Rescue and Hollins Fire &
Rescue stations. The Masons Cove facility is located six miles north of the petitioner's site and housed two
ambulances and one of each of the following as of May, 2008: pumper, tanker, brush truck, squad vehicle
and utility/personnel transport vehicle. The Hollins Fire & Rescue station is situated approximately five
miles east of the subject property and contained two pumpers, two ambulances, one ladder truck and
one reserve ambulance as of May, 2008. Additionally, the new North County station will be operational later
in 2009 assuming a portion of the burden of Hollins Station 5 which has handled one-third of all Roanoke
County fire and rescue incidents for several years. Sanitary sewer is located onsite along the stream
paralleling the southwest boundary of the proposed development. Public water is slated to be provided
through a joint effort by City of Salem and the Western Virginia Water Authority by extension from Salem
under Electric Road to the subject property.
Community Meetinas - Neighborhood meetings were held on November 19, 2008, and on February 12,
2009, to allow the petitioner to present its proposal to area property owners and other interested citizens.
Approximately 50 people attended the first meeting where the overwhelming concern expressed was traffic
safety. Screening and buffering and impacts on nearby schools also were discussed. At the second
meeting, with a similar number in attendance, traffic was more directly addressed with VDOT staff and
Edward Rose's transportation consultant (HSMM AECOM) available for detailed information (see Traffic
Impact Analysis & Review).
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The 2005 Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property a combination of Transition and Core.
Generally, the higher elevated, more forested northern half of the project area is delineated Transition
and the lower-lying southern half of the site is designated Core. Transition policy advocates the orderly
development of highway frontage tracts or as a well-developed buffer between existing single family
residential areas and existing and future commercial land uses along Route 419 and Cove Road. Quoting
the applicant, "the community plan calls for a high standard of design in architecture, landscaping and
signage. The proffered concept plan reflects a planned community incorporating all of these elements,
including the desired vegetative and topographical buffering and in particular the preservation of existing
large trees." The Core designation specifies future land use areas for high intensity urban development
Select large-scale highway oriented retail uses are also encouraged. Both land use designations call for the
inclusion of greenways, bike and pedestrian trails into project design with linkages to adjoining
neighborhoods. Proposed density for the multi-family residential portion of the development calls for
252 apartment units constructed on 23.6 acres (10.68 units per acre), roughly equivalent to the Transition
category residential density cited in the comprehensive plan. Core category land use types cited by the
comprehensive plan include general retail shops, personal services, offices and institutional uses - within
the range of uses proffered by the petitioner.
5
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
This proposal by Edward Rose Properties, Inc., would provide a transitional land use between established
single family residential neighborhoods to the east and existing and future commercial uses along Route
419. The multi-family residential density proffered is practical per comprehensive plan policy. The shared
access concept between proposed apartments and the proffered range of future commercial uses limits
Cove Road access points to the extent possible, but cannot compensate for the unknown additional traffic
volume that this development will yield at complete build-out - estimated to occur in 2012 for the apartment
complex. The request has generated significant concern from nearby residents, mainly in regard to traffic.
Construction of 252 new apartments could generate 1,500 vehicle trips to and from the development.
Commercially-generated trips are even more difficult to estimate without known specific users. Currently,
this segment of Cove Road carries 3,600 vehicles daily. Completion of two future commercial buildings in
addition to proposed new multi-family family traffic volume could double the existing Cove Road traffic load.
If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request, staff suggests the following addition to
the proffers submitted:
Add "Apartment complex identification signage shall be limited to one maximum 30 square-foot
monument sign located at/near each of the two proposed vehicular access points on Cove Road."
In addition, the following uses within the range proffered by the petitioner require acquisition of a Special
Use Permit Adult Care Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing Home, Religious Assembly,
Mini-warehouse.
CASE NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
HEARING DATES:
27 - 12/2008
Timothy Beard
PC: March 3, 2009
BOS: March 24, 2009
ATTACHMENTS:
Rezoning application
Aerial and Site Photographs
VDOT comment letters
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
R-2 District Regulations
R-3 District Regulations
C-2 District Regulations
6
5204 Bernard Drive
POBox 29800
Roanoke, VA 240 18~0798
(540) 771-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Dale reed ved:
10-3-0'6
A I. . Ii c.-'^ /
pp Icallon ee: 4 J
11;;) ,5 33'~ ")027
pz - /1g () 309L/
Received by: ~4/, ff ~
1w ' rJ,(l1/./1
LA\-.u.
County of Roanoke
Community Development
Planning & Zoning
For Staff Use Onl
pefBZA dale:
--06"
Placards issued:
BOS dale:
, ' , . - - - -, ..,'. -. .,'.' . '. . ,. , ','..
.-.-,,',-- --'-'-,,'-..-",--,--,-...".:-'-'-.
......-... "',,- - '--.
."',' -,.",--.---:.'-....,-',.
. '",' -. -. ,." "....- .
ALL APPLICANTS ...
Check type of application filed (check all that apply)
X Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance 0 Waiver
Applicants name/address wlzip
EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC
790 I Crawfordsville Road, Suite D
Indianapolis, IN 46214
o Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15 2~22m Review
Phone: 317-388-4317 x 125 (Laurie Corley)
Work:
Fax No:
Owner's name/address wlzip
Phone #:
Work:
Fax No. #:
Multiple--Please see attached sheet
Property Location
Cove Road at Green Ridge Road
Magisterial District: Catawba
'ommunity Planning area: Hollins-Peters Cree
Tax Map No: Multiple--Plense see attached sheet.
Existing Zoning: R-2 and C-2
. - . ,. - , - - - -. ." .
., "-".'. .. .-'- .-.
". . . ..
., ","'. ---. .. , .. ......
.". .,. ,".. -. ..
.", ,....-....-,.-",". -. .' ," '. -.
. ., .-'." .
. .. .. . -.,". '-", ,
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER ANDCOMP PLAN (/5.2-w2)REVIEWAPPLICANTS (RfS/W/CP)
Proposed Zoning: R-3 and C-2 with conditions--Please see attached sheet
Proposed Land Use: Apartment development and unspecified commercial Please see attached description
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No 0
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, ate conditions being proffered with this request') Yes X No 0
. , ." -.. '. - '- . ... -.. -." , "
. , , . - -. . ... .... ..
. - , - ,. - - -.. - - ' ,. . --
. - . -.. -- - " "...".
.. .-. -.- -..................
.-.", . ,. , ,",. "
".. - ," ',-. - . '--.
. - - . -. . - -- - - - - - - -. , ,
VARIANCE,lVAIVER AND ADMINISTlV1TIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VI1WAA)
VariancelWaiver of Section(s)
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
A eal of Zonin Administrator's decision to
A ealofInte retation of Section(s):
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR
INCOMPLETE.
RlSfW/CP VIM
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
RISI\\'ICI' \'1,\,\
Consultation
Application
Justification
RlSlWfCP VIM
I D Application fee
8 Ill" x II" concept plan
Metes and bOllnds description __ Proffers, ifapplicablc
Water and sewer <1ppIiC:llion Adjoining owners
I hereby certify that I am either the owner oflhe properly or the owner's ogent or contrJct purclmser and 0111 octing with the knowledge and consent of
thc owncr Edwmd ose ProP. ties c., Controcll\l[cho$cr
By . ~_~_ ___
1#1123440.1, 109694~OOO()I~()11
2
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMITW AIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232)REVIEW
. REQUESTS .
Applicant EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INe.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use pennit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible Use additional space if necessary
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found
at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
The R~3 district is "intended to coincide with the ., .. transition land use categor[y]" of the Community Plan; to have
access to major streets, sewer and water, and schools having adequate capacity; and with parcel sizes large enough to pennit
"well-planned residential development" It is also "intended to serve as a buffer between less intensive residential areas and
more intensive. , . districts" The proposed apartment development satisfies all of those criteria: It is located in the Core and
Transition areas; fronts on a major street and is only a shott distance from North Electric Road and 1-81; has access to sewer
and water; is a short distance from Glen Cove Elementary School and convenient to Northside Junior and Senior High
Schools; will be a carefully designed, unitary development covering almost 24 acres; and will buffer the existing residential
neighborhood from existing and future commercial uses along Cove Road and North Electric Road.
The purpose of the C-2 district is "to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities
serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county.n The district is "most appropriately found along
major arterial thoroughfares'" Land uses within the district "are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in
the Transition and Core land use categories" ofthe comprehensive plan This commercial site is readily accessible to a large
surrounding area via 1-81, North Electric Road, Green Ridge Road and Cove Road, and is located in Core and Transition
areas.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County
Community Plan.
The land which is the subject of this application is located in areas designated "Core" and "Transition" in the Community
Plan.. (Please see the attached portion of the Land Use Map,) The major portion of the proposed commercial site is in the
Core area, and the major portion of the apartment site is in the Transition area.
The Core area is intended for "high intensity urban development" and "larger-scale highway oriented retail uses"
involving clustered retail uses and planned office and institutional uses, served by an arterial street system. The proposed
commercial site isjust a few hundred feet along Cove Road from North Electric Road and readily accessible to and from 1-
81, both major commercial thoroughfares
The Transition area is to serve as a less intensively developed buffer between highways and adjacent lower intensity
development. Multi-family development is an approved land use type in the Transition area, This apartment development
will buffer the existing single-family neighborhoods to the north and east from the commercially zoned land along NOIth
Electric Road and Cove Road~
The Community Plan calls for a high standard of design in architecture, landscaping and signage, The proffered concept
plan reflects a planned community incorporating all of these elements, including the desired vegetative and topographical
buffering and in particular the preservation of existing large trees.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adj oining properties, and the surrounding area, as
well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire
and rescue.
The proposed 7.8-acre commercial site (39 acres of which is already zoned C-2) will lie along, and be accessed nom,
Cove Road, and the 23 6-acre apartment development will be situated behind that, also being accessed from Cove Road. The
entire area between Cove Road and Interstate 81, west of the commercial site, is highway right of way, so no private owners
will be directly impacted by the commercial uses, The apartment development will entirely screen the commercial site from
properties to the east and will itself be substantially screened on the east by existing large trees.
The property lies only a few hundred yards from North Electric Road and its access ramps to and nom 1-81, which are the
outes expected to absorb the majority of the traffic impacts from both the proposed commercial and apartment uses Please
see the attached Traffic Study,
Water and sewer are available Please see attached letter from WVW A.
The new Roanoke County Recreation and Aquatic Center, only 23 miles away via Green Ridge and Wood Haven Roads,
should be able to accommodate the recreation needs of the apartment residents, who will also have access to the recreational
facilities (clubhouse with fitness center, swimming pool) which will be included in the project.
{1/1123440-), 1 09694~0000 I .01 }
3
County fire and rescue responders will be the Mason's Cove Station (5,1 miles away) and the Hollins Station (4,6 miles away),
though the nearest emergency services facility is actually the City of Roanoke's Station #13 on Peters Creek Road, only 23 miles
and less than 5 minutes away
While it is of course impossible to predict the exact makeup of the tenant population of the apartment project, the developer's
experience would suggest that the tenant mix will not include a large number of families with school-aged children, In any event,
based on its web page, Glen Cove Elementary School would appear to have a capacity of in excess of 800 children and a current
enrollment of less than 500, so that even in tile event an unexpectedly large percentage of the tenant population consists of
families with children, overloading of Glen Cove School from this development would not seem likely
(# 1123440-1, 109694-00001-0 I I
IJ1JSTIFl(~ATIONFOR VARIANCE REQUEST
.<>1
Applicant
The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance
can be granted~ Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If
additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper.
1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the
7.oning Ordinance.
2, The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation (as
distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and would prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property.
3. The hardship is not shared by other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity, Such hardships should be addressed by
the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district.
(#] ]23440.1,109694-0000]-01)
4
JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST
Applicant
Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible, If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper
1 Reasons for appeal:
12. Evidence supporting claim:
(1I1l23440-1, 109694.00001.01)
5
!itO&CEPT PLAN CHECKLI~T.)................ ...
....... ....,
. .n
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising from the request In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County penl1itting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance ofa building penni!
Site plan and building pem1it procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan Unless limiting conditions arc proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15 2-2232) review and variance
applications The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
ofthe request The County Planning Division staffmay exempt some ofthe items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
following are considered minimum:
-L u.
1 b
L c
-L d
-L e
~
-L g
.-::L h.
L
1-
Additiona/ ill/ormation required for REZONING and SPECIAl. USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
L k Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
-1- 1 Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
../ m Topogfilphy map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
L n
(\11\ 0
lit p
NI\ q
Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
lfproject is to be phased, please show phase schedule
~cl1~ /. 'UlClb
Date
6
Community Development
Planning & Zoning Division
NOTICE TO ApPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER,
PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICA nON ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional
information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the
Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not
available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and
provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the
scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition.
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate
the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be
included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be
warranted
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning,
Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County
Transportation Engineering Manager or staff fro111 the Virginia Department of TranspOltation
requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in
making a land use decision (Note a list of potential land uses and situations that }vould
necessitatefilrther study is provided as part o.fthis application package).
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing pmties to evaluate
the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments
and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is
warranted, the applicant will be notified ofthe continuance and the newly scheduled public
hearing date.
Effective Date: April 19, 2005
Petitioner's Signature
tlP6btJ1.-I, 'Jt; tJt)
Date
Community Development
- Planning & Zoning Division
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANAL YSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic-generating land uses and road
network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and
proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or
special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the
ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County
Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation
staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be
submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reselVe the right to
request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic-Generating Land Uses:
. Single-family residential subdivisions/ Multi-family residential units, or
Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units
. Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows)
o Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
o Retail shop/Shopping center
. Offices (including: Financial institutions, general, medical, ete.)
. Regional public facilities
. Ed ucational/Recreational facilities
. Religious assemblies
. Hotel/Motel
. Golf course
. Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
. Industrial site/Factory
. Day care center
. Bank
. Non-specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
. Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 50Q-ft of intersection of a
roadway classified as an arterial road (e,g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460,
220, 221, 419, etc)
. For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted
traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have
changed significantly
. When reqUired to evaluate access issues
. Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion,
widening/ improvements, etc, (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six-Yr
Road Plan, etc.)
. Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety
problem
. Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic
signal(s)
. Substantial departure from the Community Plan
. Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the
(111123440-1,
109694-00001-
01 )
peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or
over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day
{l11123440-1. 1 09694~OOOO 1-0 l}
REZONING APPLICATION
EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INe.
PARCELS TO BE REZONED
LIST OF TAX MAP NUMBERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS
Tax Map No.
Acreage
Owner, Address and Telephone
j036011-02-04.00
10350
Baldwin-Swift Properties LLC
3216 Williamson Road
Roanoke, VA 24012
537-0055 (Dan Baldwin)
J 036.11-02-03.00
1. 17.3
Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC
P. O. Box 201
Roanoke, V A 24002
29.3-8506 (Calvin Powers)
1/'036,11-02-02.00
)0.36.11-02-01.00
1.152
Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC
0.133
Roanoke Airport Business Park LLC
j036.11-02-01.01
3.490
Melvin L and Pauline.T. Ronk
6356 Cove Road, NW
Roanoke, VA 24019
562-1829
~36~ 11-02-36.00*
15,094
Estelle R Ronk et aL
3.317 Carner Lane
Roanoke~ VA 24019
562-2780 (Estelle Rank)
*Tax Parcel 036.1 1-02-36.00 comprises a total acreage of 27..372. Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
is purchasing a 15,094-acre portion of this tract, which will be subdivided for the sale. Only that
15.094-acre portion is being rezoned.
{IIII23523-1,I09694-00001-0I}
REZONING APPLICA nON
EDW ARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INe.
AREAS TO BE REZONED
NOTE: Maps and metes and bounds descriptions of each parcel are at Tab 5,
Tax Map No.
036.11-02-04,00
036, ll-02-03~00
036,11-02-02,00
036,11-02-01.00
036.11-02-01.01
036,11-02-36,00
{1I1123523-1~ I09694-00001,OI}
Current Zoning
Requested Zoning
R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2
C-2
2
R-3
R-3 - 1" 173 acres
C-2 - 17 square feet
R-3 - 0.810 acre
C-2 - 0.342 acre
C-2
C-2 - 3A36 acres
R-3 - 0,054 acre
R - 3 - 11.199 acres
(Remaining 3 ~895 acres stays
C-2)
,
1 ';'0
T'0",,~
,
. ~~
~ m,
~~~~n
~U~n
I III : i
I! i I
I I IS:
~
~>~ll
~~o~~.
2U~~~
h~a~
I ' f ),..,)
: l':\l
:h
~~. .
~~~~ :~
~U~m
oEl]O) ,
.
,
,
-- ~
--~
~-~
+
. ~~
8 .' ~
M~;~
m~i;
I II I' f
I,' '
" ,
I i I :
$'
~'
hi~
i~~3B
eiiEe'
,~=~~e
8u~.H
1:11:)
: \':':\
, )L.f.
~~ .
~ ~ ~ ~~
i~~~~to
.e~an
DElle) I
~
~~E!~~
~ ~~m~
"
:::J'IIISJOO .
. "
~ ~~t
~m
~ ~m
~ e~m
~'t<"""
~
. t
~ be~~
d~~ ;~
~~9~~il
h~~s~
.. ...... ....
<<:G~J:>
=
~
hih ~
~~s~ii ~
H~~~ ~
111111111
! .~ ~
e ~~B~
: 2~:a5
REZONING APPLICATION
EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INC.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPER AND THE PROJECT
THE DEVELOPER: Edward Rose Properties, Inc, is a family-owned company
headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, The Rose family has been continuously involved
in residential development and construction since 1921 and since 1965 has concentrated its
efforts on apartment construction and management. The company now owns and manages over
53,000 rental units in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio,
South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin,
Developments in Virginia include Waterfront in Virginia Beach (684 units), The Vinings
in Richmond (258 units), Trophy Club (248 units) and Enclave (254 units) in Midlothian, and
Sunscape on Colonial Avenue in Roanoke County (264 units). The new Roanoke project is
being developed by and will be managed from Rose's regional office in Indianapolis, which also
manages Sunscape.
Edward Rose Properties builds apartments to hold for its own account. It last sold a
development in 1986, It is therefore committed to constructing and maintaining developments
with a high standard of quality.
THE PROJECT: The proposed apartment project will consist of 12 buildings on 23.6
acres, comprising a total of 252 aparhnent units, plus a management office and clubhouse.
While a final decision has not yet been made on the the exact configuration ofthe units, a
typical Rose project ofthis size contains a mix of .35% one-bedroom units, 50% two-bedroom
units, and 15% three-bedroom units.
The commercial area totals 7,8 acres and will consist of two pads, bisected by the
entrance road. Depending on the exact location of the entry drive, the pads will be roughly
identical in size, Deed restrictions will be used to insure that the appearance of the buildings
constructed on the commercial site is generally consistent with the design and construction ofthe
apartment buildings.
{It/ /23523-/, /09694-0000/-0/}
3
WOLF CREEK MASTERPLAN & DESIGN GUIDELINES
OPEN SPACE PLAN
1. A wildflower meadow in the front of the property is adjacent to Mountain View
Road. With an orchard at the rear of this area, it is maintained to appear as a part
of the National Park. The trails through this land are, universally accessible. The
land adjacent to the trail will be mowed more closely. The outside of the upper trail
is the property line.
2. Lining the meadow through the rear of the property is a Homeowner's Association
owned and operated variable width streamside trail loop that crosses Wolf Creek
on a small bridge, traverses the gorge adjacent to the creek and then climbs
between two lots before going into Muse's Dell and returning to the front of the
property.
3. In Muse's Dell, a picnic seating area will be provided with two picnic tables and
two park benches.
4. Trails will be constructed in locations shown on the "Wolf Run/Wolf Crest, Beech
Cove and Richard's Wood proposed amenities" map, dated May 6, 2008. Trail
amenities to be installed along the trails included two benchesJ 1 to 2 foot bridges
depending upon trail placement, 3-5 planting beds adjacent to the walking trail
measuring 40 sq ft each, tree labels for trees of significance by species placed
adjacent to the walking trail, and trail signs located at trail entrances or
i nte rsection s.
19
w
~
EXISTING ZONING CONDITIONS
PROPERTY GURRENTL Y ZONED
C-2 = 15.1 AG. +/-
PROPERTY GURRENTL Y ZONED
R-2 = 16.3 AG. +/-
\
,
,
GRAPHIC SCALE \
~ i.,
(DfPBr) )
, ..... - ... " m I
r-
::om.
00,
c~
~~
mO
..... ::0
u;~
o
~
,
/
,
,
,
,
" " \
':'y
" 'y
,,",,/ /
'" ') ~ ,
" :' yj~
" ""',~~~
, ~ 'v~~~~
"'~~" /
, "-- ,~~\ ' ,,",'
'" '"", ~ ~ " '
y~~ ,,",->Y
, ~'
, ,
,
-
I
~
,
,
,
/
\
\
,
,
D
~
~~~ '.:~ ,_.~~~~' .,
~
w
PROPOSED ZONING CONDITIONS
AMOUNT OF PROPERTY ZONED
C-2 AFTER REZONING = 7.8 AG. +/.
AMOUNT OF PROPERTY ZONED
R-3 AFTER REZONING = 23.6 AG. +/-
PROPERTY REZONED FROM R-2
TO C-2 = 3.9 AG. +/-
PROPERTY REZONED FROM R-2
TO R-3 = 12.4AG. +/-
PROPERTY REZONED FROM C-2
TO R-3 = 11.2 AG. +/-
PROPERTY TO REMAIN C-2 AFTER
REZONING = 3.9 AG. +/-
\
GRAPffiC S';"ALE \
~~ I,
,~~" J
r-
::om.
00,
c:-l
-l~
mO
..... ::0
<O~
o
,
,
/
,,'.... \
"....y
">,
" .... "",/ /
... '>' ,
....'..yj'
'" ' , """,_~<v,
.. . ",/~<q'
.... "~~" /
, ,,~ " '
.. v~,' '.. 'v
y~~ '....,"'y
, ~'
, ,
..
\
.
-
I
~
\
\
,
,
/
\
\
,
,
The following is a deed description for Tax Parcel 36,11-02-04 to be rezoned from R-2 to
R-3^ The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Cove Road (Virginia
Secondary Route 780), said point also being northwesterly comer of Tax Parcel 36.11-
02-05; thence leaving Cove Road and with Tax: Parcel 36,11-02-05, S .37024' 22" W,
438.65 feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.1 1-02-
05; thence continuing with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05, S .39021' 23" E, passing the
southwesterly comer of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-06 at 90.00 feet, in a11276.9l feet to a point,
said point being the southeasterly comer of Tax Parcel 36,11-02-06; said point also
located on the westerly boundary of Plain View Subdivision and on the westerly
boundary of Tax Parcel 36,11-02-09; thence leaving Tax Parcel #.36.11-02-06 and with
Plain View Subdivision, S 4.30 25' 00" W, 959,48 feet to a point, said point located on the
westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01, said point also located on the easterly
boundary of Tax Parcel 36~ 11-02-36; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36,15-01-01 and with
Tax: Parcel 36.11-02-36, N 070 04' 26" E, passing the southeasterly comer of Tax Parcel
#36.1 1-02-01.01 at 740,04 feet, in all 916.97 feet to a point, said point located on the
southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01
and with Tax Parcel #36.11-02-03 for the following 2 courses; thence S 84039' 30" E,
120,66 feet to a point; thence N 1 r 28' 30" E, 550.84 feet to a point, said point located
on the southerly right-of-way of Cove Road; thence leaving Tax Parcel #36.11-02-03 and
with the southerly right-of-way of Cove Road for the following 4 courses; thence with a
curve to the right which said curve is defined by delta angle of 340 18' 12", a radius of
531.23 feet, an arc distance of 318.05 feet, a chord of 31.3.32 feet and bearing S 640 11'
35" E to a point; thence S 440 21' 17" E, 2855 feet to a point; thence N 450 32' 43" E,
30.00 feet to a point; thence S 44021' 17" E, 40.50 feet to the place of BEGINNING and
containing 10350 acres.
~ lGO~S'~O
~z'H 9~.qGO~HO
41
In
b ;2
(~ ~~~~~~
~) 411 II 1I~<::i
<>:1"......<riC
l-
:'0 ~~~
(fj0::!E og:;2;
<::J ~o o:~G
~~cra: ~Q~
Oc:i~Ql<)o:q!
J: to I L.u 0: t..:l Q:: ~.
V) "<t ..., <: <::J '-'-1
f-,-...,~gZf;;:
Q5(jq)l"j O~b
i:~~0:~~-<(8
CjO"l1::~ Q:=!:~
~~G:i ~~~
~~cn ~~~
V\1-=C
~~
OfjL,~S~~f: .M/H) ;" L.J
TO VA HWY, aVoer Jg~ VA ~% ~c"
___RTf #419 IJ n~ ~~ ~
~ ~)... l-~
U} ~~
ti.if:l
)~
-
b
o
N
<3
(3
I /
~
.!.
<ci
&l
:x:
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
~
DNINOZ za I
----",""
tJNINOZ r~
-
00' "
6O.~~
00.... ",0_
01 ..",~ YI'
00 /1" :ro~ .9['cv
(?,.. p:/ 11.9.
.... .. "'0"....... r'",_
W" 0, ~P:t :l/~~"" ;,.:
$' '02: ......... .9['0>" g
I(f';' ~T
00l: ....rg':t/. 'U.;sl
1--; .9['q.r> N'<{< 4i
00'," ,.rf!~> ~
PI" v:( '11;-"
~ 00'" 'C0~.9['0>"
.& S/~..rI;/'II.9.'
~ .. "'0~r'0>"
:;,>/ a ..,.,~II'
/ '0.91'(;>, '-.... 8r0f'
.-r,O,
00. .... 1:;11'
</ ~ .......... S?r&, #
fP~ -..... .s.5
00.% .. .."I:t :l/j:>.() ~ A~
0''/0'' 0P ~ qytV
.f'J;<;-S~~
, :r'0P'
,
~
:::l
(:l
~
~
b
o
N
u..'60
o.
~a:.
csri
~aj
::eo..:
<::>
<::>
<0'
....,
J,
<::>
.!.
~
~
"'"
~
o
"
,
~
]
o
U
o
d
2:
ll.i ~ ill
I- ::;: ~
<( 0
0 () ()
[/)
::~~
:;:~8
~~u
t___ I..... 0....
66~
":t.q<-O
~~Ln
W .. ~
z~:::J
ou..-'
1: @J
"" :::::
~
.:.J
~
,;"
:J '"
z 5
~ ~
Z ~
o z
gm~
on?f5>
~ 1""1 wJ
~xu;;
",,00
...""z
~ (US
...""""
b
~
II
~~
P-.t:.IJ
u5~
~~
~iQ
Uo
0>-<::
CfJ.i:.IJ-
Cf) 13::>: Z
-< -
~
ZC{l-
J:;&;.:l~>
Qi:.IJr:.d
~~~
~C1<
,.....Jffi~
'.-
~
<(
u
VI
O"'no
~Z'~~'9C-qoOC~LO\Jn.
\OC~LO\.l.OOZ\'O
UIMlttp\IM
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parcel 36, 11 ~02-03 to be rezoned
from R-2 to R-3. The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of.way of Virginia Secondary
Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel
36, 11-02-04~ thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-
02-04 for the following 2 courses; thence S 17028' 30" W, 550.84 feet to a point; thence
N 840 39' 30" W, 120.66 feet to a point, said point located on the easterly boundary of
Tax Parcel 36.1l-02-0LOl;thence leaving Tax Parce136J 1-02-04 and with Tax Parcel
36.11-02-01 ~01 for the following 2 courses; thence N 070 50' 30" E, 13 1.31 feet to a
point; thence N 030 36' 30" W, 7.73 feet to a point; thence with new zoning line through
Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 090 45' 10" E, 12.15 feet to a point; said point located on the
southerly boundary of Tax parcel 36.11-02.02; thence with the boundary of Tax Parcel
36.11-02-02, S 84028' .30" E, 77,16 feet to a point; thence N 14049' 30" E, 390.82 feet
to a point, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondmy Route
780; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02 and with Virginia Secondary Route 780 with
a curve to the right which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 090 39' 36" , a radius
of 531.2.3 feet, an arc length of 89.57 feet, a chord of 8946 feet and bearing S 860 10'
29" E, to the point of BEGINNING and containing 1,173 acres.
IlnO~.H.'E:O~ -
o ~I 9C~q.OC~lO
u..a;
o .
~~
B;""i
ffia:i
:::;0..:
.....
'2 C ~S2;:$
Vi C:::E o~~
(!J onO Q::l.f)~
~:ifiu.'Te: ~Q~
O~O~C1r<)O~
:t:U)<: 1l.aj0:::(,,)~~'
V),-,O"""<: (!)t::;
..... .>::...~:2<:!":
Qj(,,)Q::o:Ql.aj O~
5:;'<1: OC')Q::t'J-I(!)O
Xr<)QC 0:::'<1:<(1;.)
l.aj K "lb e" Cl :::E
:: k~ ~~~
'<1: E.:!m '<1::s:~
i2:<<:<<:l
V)f..'Q
(5R:
COVE ROAD
V A. SEe RTE, Wrao
_TO VA HwY (RfW vARiES)
RTE #419 Cl
'. ~~ J
, ~1i5 ~
\~I~ I
I K.I
~~ ~\: ~
"" ~ '\ I
~
c:>
<:::>
~
I
~
.!.
<ci
"'"l
~
""
~
<ci
C5
"'"
""
~
~
6
I
8
d:
b
<0
o
b
10
;:~~
:J~o
';'N~
~f:::~
o-z
~S?~
~~Vi
.... ~
z~::J
ou.."""'
I ~
a. -
~
!
::: 0:>
Z 0
~ ~
z ~
o :?;
g$?2
~~~
~x~
",00
..,."'Z
;gci<C
..,.o..:~
b
10
II
.
~
~~
u5~
CJ;::l~
E-....J
<:'t
-~
Uo
SSE;.i:S
en >- Z
~p:::-
~~
z"P-
w~>
@~~
~~~
~~-<
....J ~ 2i?
~
<>:
u
V1
DMP'{
"ICO -l-!r9C-Q"
oe~ LO' '".'oeLLD'
LOOZ'UOUI"DJp,''''
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parcel 36.11-2-03 to be rezoned
from R-2 to C-2, The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, said point also
located on the easterly boundary of Tax #36.11-02-01.01; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-
02 and with Tax #36J 1-02-01.01, S 030 36' 30" E, 12.27 feet to a point; thence leaving
Tax #36.11-02-01.01 and with the new zoning line through the property of Tax #36,11-
02-03, N 090 45' 10" E, 12.15 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly
boundary of Tax #36.11-02-02; thence with Tax #36.11-02-02, N 840 28' .30" W, 2.84
feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 17 square feet
""D^.I'&O'2~119c'q.oellO
I-
O<..l-o:!
C O<l: 12 ;;
lI...~~ f.':~
~Ot')O tt::!:2~
~~'Ta: ~Cl~
;;:;gt\l 0-1"'"
~o::C63~u~~'
(1)02.<: ~ffi
I-CL""io2:c:f.':
-~tdt:l o!:2:::i
!!:) .t')Q::t'.l-l~C
:t:lI)c I:l:::<l:<l:t.l
C)r-..,*=C-' a::!:J;;:i
_><~ 1::!<l:""1
<l:e:1m <l:~SE
~~~
V)<l:Q;;
u
CO\fF. ROl\D
V ~ SEC. RTK if1BO
(R/"'# V ARIES)
Cl
c:i
z
ill ~ ill
I- ...
<C 0 <C
0
0 0 U)
~~z
......0
't,\,U
~ ~~~
__z
DO""'
<::i ~"l'Cl
~ _~U'}
.. .. ~
z:<:J
ou.....
I @J
0.. ='
~
--'
::1'
~
,.1J
::; ro
Z 5
w ...
~ N
<::> Z :0;
o~ c;, o ;
o~ ~ t:J"'u
....""""
cr:i' I co~>
om ~ ~N .
<:2x'S<!
Ir-- 1 IDOO
NO - <f'(OZ
0"'" <ci j;OC3
I"'; ><)
......10 ~ .,.0..0<:
,..............
to "<
O"JU ~ c.jen
o~ 0..:0:::
*'
~~ C/i'~
e-..-i ~Jj
~~
Uo
"0 O~-<
~W-
CD >:2:;
sg
ZC{-l>-<
b t:.Ll~>
CD o -
II UJ~~
a ~
~ ::E-:2:;
'" ;:::::J f@-<
U ,.....JW~
VJ
b
CD
I I
, I
(,.!) ~,)I"") c::>
E; "-' I 0.:: c::>
~4J . C'..J
~~' I cr
:s:::J' ILu ~
~ ~\ Ib 1
~~ In~ ~
~ I~CO 'Ci
~ :;;: , 1'<1- (',j 8
C5(5'~CO ~
Q ~ tI) ><::
L,I ~
~~)I~ I
~!:'"lt;l Il ; J ~ ~
c::> <g ~ 1 c- I r.l::
1 ....- .:- It) C'l Lt:
...... '3 1 \()""'; c::>
""': I"~ I -..A~
t..O 'Z 0) ...... I,"""" r..
t") I 0 ...... - <:: "-'
c::> tI) 'Ci Vi ~ Q
~ 1 8 ....... It-:::.
X I ~CL..l~
~ I )>, Ct:: Ct::
I ~ (,.!)
I ;s;
~
Lu
&-1-.1
p::G
J::;;r:::tV')
rnr:2
z'-
.......0
~
<::>
<::>
~
<::>
I
8
I
-
<ci
1ii
"<
;:;
lu
~
I~
I \ ~!:-l
~ '- ~I~ ~
~ ......fS:::i
I- \ ~I~ ~
~ ~\~I ~
,I ~
(~\'I: ~
~ ~ ~ 77.16'
'p?,"g l-. ~s 84'28 Jp E
\9,0.'r-' 60.00-
. N i")
~\Y ;~ ~
"1 ~ii r:::. p
~ is fll5 ~ ~
\.~ ..... "?~~
.:::.~~~
g t:i
Cl ~ <;;.;.
~ ~
Cl lJ)
Z
I
I
I
1
'<:
N 8~'JO. W 120.66'
co 0 b
a C'l
0 ,.... to
C\J r-'.. II
.,.: 0
:;; ~
,c
0
"0
0
OMP'CO'~.W9C
~q.o SllO\"S\O SIIO\lOO
(:\s8tJIM9.,1P\:M
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #36,11-02-02 to be rezoned from
R-2 to R-3. The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary
Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel
36.11-02-03 (Parcel II) (D.E. 1706, Pg. 376); thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route
780 and with the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, S 14049' 30" W, 390,82
feet to a point; thence continuing with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 84028' 30" W, 77,16
feet to a point; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and with the new zoning line
through Tax parcel 36.11-02-02, N 090 45' 10" E, 362.10 feet to a point, said point
located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence with a
curve to the right, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 09022' 17", an arc
length of 83.08 feet, a radius of 507.96 feet, a chord of 82.99 feet and bearing N 81046'
29" E, to a point; thence continuing with a curve to the right, which said curve is defined
by a delta angle of 030 35' 54", an arc length of3336 feet, a radius of 531.23 feet, a
chord of ~33.36 feet and bearing N 870 11' 45" E to the place of BEGINNING and
containing 0.81 acres.
tl"O^'I~lq ~'~~119t~q.OnlO
<:;)
q
C;
~
I
~
<ri
ij,
""
~
"'?'t\t
S\tC.
__ ~ ~~ ~~\~Sl
~ ~o~\) l..."'?I'{\
c:,o
c
~1~()
~
~
n
~I
:t
'"
C:i
c;
I
~
~
<ri
,...,
~
><
~
<:.!I
~
~
r:B
1tI
~
I-
~
~
l
<::>
;; ~
l' "l
i01~C,j
l' (j 0...
-~<O
~Q::o
,...,~~
~ a;;
c:i
t....
e
Z l-
e ClU~
J::; '<(-
~~6 ?E0c.?
Q)Cl...~!:t: kJo81
Z........ILC ;s;....J~
3Et..:CQ I<')o<{.
OViQ~ct:OQ:~
~~.!dso<.!:lf::!~
01..... Nf':-Zlt)l::j
t:C\li'Q1.,j 3<30
~trlt':lct:~'<('<(u
~t2.~<.!:l Cl::!;~
L.l (j >-1 ~ l:!:! iii ~
"C:"lllQ "'Cs:~
o Eo< E~c
to Vid~
c:i
"C
---
~~i1;i8~
8N~S;:1'l
O>,..,Q",
- ~
41l.L1Lylu
C!:I iii " II .
!l$t.r)"'''''
~€~~
f::;1lO~lQ
:;c::l:::;c<:
~~~~~~
1-=
~~l-..' ';..'J..,
Q~CO<cl
~~:e~~
~1:gl.)1:g1g
~~;~~ b
to
!s!
~GtHl2S b
to
. II
0
~
q;
c.:>
UJ
b
to
a:l 0 b
Cl C') to
<:> ~
N , II
.,.: I'--
0 ~
ill
.D
0
ti'
a
a
z
ill ~ ti.i
...J
t- ::;: <(
<( 0 0
0 0 (IJ
:=~::t
"""0
1"":'U
~~~
~:::~
~@o
~~Vl
.. ..::;
z~3
aU-@)
I: ....
0.. -
~
--'
;;:
:>,
w
':5 to
Z (5
w "
> <',
<( <(
6 ~
t:;~~
ffi~5
:;;; "" w'
~X'"
lD2~
~qd
.".0..'"
UCIJ
.~
~~
~j
E-<c...
;::SrQ
Uo
o>-~
~~z
~~~
zcr-
~~>:
o~~
U)~o
~::s~
~~o
......:lj;iJtx:
BMp'lql~'~~11 '9t-q'O CllQ \In. \OCILO \LO O~\'6"", OJP\'"
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02 to be rezoned
from R-2 to C-2, The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route
780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36,11-02-
01, Parcel III (D.R 1706, Pg. 376); thence leaving Tax Parcel36J 1-02-01 and with the
southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780 with a curve to the right, which
said curve is defined by a delta angle of 10004' 56", a radius of 507,96 feet, an arc length
of 89.38, a chord of 89.27 feet and bearing N 72002' 52" E to a point; thence with a new
zoning line thru the property of Tax #36.11-02-02, Parcell (D.R 1706, Pg, 376); S 090
45' 10"W, 362JO feet to a point, said point located on the boundary of Tax Parce136J 1-
02-03; thence leaving new zoning line and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 840 28' 30"
W, 2.84 feet to a point, said point located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36,11-
02-01.01; thence leaving Tax Parcel.36J 1-02-03 and with Tax Parce136.l1-02-01.0l, N
03036' 30" W, passing the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel #36.11-02-01 at 251.45
feet, in all .329.74 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 0.342 acres.
?-'t~
~ '2;~C :-.
<: '1 ~ '01~S ,
1:!i ",\ -- ~~\."
~ '?-O l?>-'"' \'?-/~
~ co~. clt
....
~
Q..
\
unO~llJ~I'lo'o"11 'ge"oGonLe
c;,
~ ~"~
c;, ").
~~c.:j;g.
Cl ,..., Cl..
.!.~.
- Q: to
<ci ;;;:
80':-
"'" oj
'>( 0
~
~"roC)
,....c?/i/\~
UI\~
,c\!i;'~'ti';i'l ~ ~
:12~ .'.1 ~ ffi :i?
....(,i~ . .i)iil !2~ ~
.:ii~~:~I~ ~ ~ ~
/~~~il~ ~ ~
>~.~....'................'t-, 0
<~~>I. I
o.<~ (.:) Lu 0--:
'... ~II ~ ~ ~ JO:
. 'is !;) C\l tI)
>N. N <:!l 0
iN11") i!J; I co ~
~I Q: is CIi ~ ...., "-
' N 0 "_c.:j =
>11!t: e1 ~e8 0... g
... <: . Q::<O '"
. I<=> co ..q;:R "'"I
...'. ~I 25 ~ Cl.. - ~
J8l ~ a:i ""
...1 :x: CIi ci
. III <:1.0
I e-.:;
. i 1
...1
I
I
I
I
~
c:;
m
6
6
I
8
.!.
C>
C>
8
1
8
...l.
-
<ci
~
'>(
~
N "".,," · .)
~~.
~
~
'>(
~
~
~ Qt;::;
!::o djg~
@5o;:e 0;::l/)tJ]
cn..~~ ~Ci~
<:---'Ili: o....J
3i:k:C\lQ~U:%~'
OvjoLuU eJ
::r: I <: Cj':;
l/)Ol-'ol2<:Vl
....~;t;j oGo
9':l'<t~0::~~::$~
~.:::..~c Cl<~
l.,j(.h.~~ ~~o
~~cn ~s~
~ E":~o
;:!; Vl(jP::
c:i
~
---
,.,. · 'h.
~~!ii~~
iSOl~<::lQ)
-"1-
........Ii.J....
....... . . :It
~-1l'>l><0l
!S),:of"~.""
:ti::P~
/!.:<>:} 115
:l:::':: :.::
;~~~~t
..-:.....,..". .....'l.,
~i!:;<:::d~ltIJ:lQ
a~!ii~~~
f;~~~~
!!i~~ait3
Y,~h1sl~
~~~~~
'0
ID
a
to
II
.
0
~
<\:
U
tf)
!s!
~ tn:Hp~
b
<0
<Xl g b
0 <C
0 ~ II
N 8
.,.: ~
....
'"
..c::l
.9
u
0
ci
:z
ill ::E ill
...J
I- ::;: ..;:
..;: 0 ()
0 0 <n
;~~
1~Cj
I.... r-.. n...
........z
~~~
~::~
LU~:l
BU.@
:r:: =
0. ~
.:..;
~
J."
LU ""
::J :;
Z "'"
~ '"
..: <(
B ~
t;:;"'~
5~>
~;::\'l
=~~
"'" ...:
~~~
~i2
~~
t-<Q..,
::5aQ
~~<:
C/1!::<.J -
cn>25
'~f5~
zcr-
wi2>-
O!::<.J~
cn~o
:E_z
~CJd
.....:l~A::
C"'p'I.I~-~~H '9r~qGO elLO \ ,.9\0 r~LO \LOO~\ 9CUI"" ,p"",
The following is a deed description for Tax Parcel .36.11-02-01 to be rezoned from R-2 to
C-2. The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary
Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly comer of Tax Parcel
36,11-02-02; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax #.36.11-02-02, S
03036' 30" E, 7829 feet to a point, said point being located on the northerly boundary of
Tax #36.11-02-01.01; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-02 and with Tax #36.1l-02-0LOl, S
890 36' 20" W, 133.69 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of
Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax Parcel .36.11-02-01.01 and with Cove
Road with a curve to the right which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 17006' 22",
a radius of 50796 feet, an arc length of 151,66 feet, a chord of 151.09 feet and bearing N
58027' 1.3" E to the place of BEGINNING and containing 0.133 acres~
..
~
..r
/' I
" :
r1
~ I
c ~ I
~ ~ I
<:::i KI I
~e:;
1':;0: I
. :::: I
'~ I
\ ~ I
~ I
, I
, I
\ I ~
(,!)I(,!)
~I~
, K11K1 ~
' t'jD~ ,~
\ II a
~
U
VI
' I
I I
\ I ~
II _
i ~-
II l'
II :
p !ii'i.
r~~
I _ _
I
I
I I
I I
i \
I t
I I '
' :1
f-' I:
------------------t-l
00 "'-'0-1/ - XYl i I
' "" '''' '-
\J"'\OClLO\lOO~\
D"p'~-~~W9C.qDOC~LO
~WgC'qDOC~LO
unDA111"~'~
l-
C1S2gJ
C3g:;~
-~g::E Ct:;lt}....,
4;'0 Ci~
(.!)Vl:3e: ~.....I'"
~1Ot4 t'-J8:::::...;-
~OlQ~(.) SJh
0r-..1;Z <.:lJ;;::2;
05ui"i0:2aVlt;j
'-'''iN ...JGc
l- 'cdWt'-J"'l:"<Cl:.J
03l:.Jt')0::l): ::0
~~~~ ~"'l:~
lU~><m "'l:~~
a~ i2~o
Vl"'l:O::
(.)
o
!f2
~
f:<:i
F-.
0::
'';""''\ ,
::E "- f;:j {:] ,
0~/
~2!
:::;:
&.
I ~ ,
!;J.f!:i,
!::~ /
o
C"J
I
I
I
I
.t:~
"'","
.~. '!
"Cl ~i,
/ ~,
/
,
I
/
""
b
"-
f. S'I~
~1l'lc>~li?ui
jg~:ci1ri"'-:
O ~LOK_{O~
<3 II II,.!!..!!, ii'i '->
<<ll::
15~
I-$E
;;;!:j$
~~
\
12'6
use:
~~~
~K1f?:
. tL~
~Q:;U:
~~
dm
q
c:;
I
2:l
..!.
~
~
><:
;:::
o .--;-
Op...
""'<c;:j
o
II!)
N(j,)
ol."-
I .
....lQ
....--
cD.
25SZ
"Ii:=cn
~~
~o
00
o
@
b
<0
II
~"'z
:;~o
"fC['l.{
;:!:~~
"''''z
600
;;;~
wX3
Z.:E@J
o -'
iE :;;:
~
.:.;
~
uJ
UJ ""
::J 5
Z ..,.
~ N
~ ~
Z Z
o -
tu~~
-'ee>
~~~
<lJ2~
..,. ..<(
:gQli1
... 0..
8
~
~
.!..
~fQ
~~
~7
-fQ
Uo<:
Ot:i_
U):=-Z
::9~a
--""'::::;'p:::;
z C{l :;:
c.zJfQ-
65~~
~a~
:::::>Z9
......:lw........
<cl
8
....
><:
i::!:
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #36-1 1-02-01.01 to be rezoned
from R-2 to C-2< The description is as follows;
BEGINNING at a corner located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary
Route 780 (Cove Road), said point also located on the southerly boundary of Tax #36< 11-
02-01; thence leaving Cove Road and with Tax #36.11-02-01, N 890 36' 20" E, 133.69
feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax #36.11-02-02; thence
leaving Tax #36< 11-02-01 and with Tax #36-11-02-02, S 030 36' 30" E, 263.72 feet to a
point; thence with a new zoning line through Tax #36< 11-02-01.01, S 090 45' 10" W,
313.61 feet to a point; said point located on the northerly boundary of Tax #36.11-02-36;
thence with said tax parcel, N 720 48' 44" W, 339.60 feet to a point, said point located on
the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax #36.11-
02-36 and with Virginia Secondary Route 780 for the following 2 courses; thence N 160
34' 12" E, 243.87 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right which said curve is
defined by a delta angle of 320.34' 20", an arc length of 288. 77 feet, a radius of 507.96
feet, a chord of 284.90 feet and bearing N .330 36' 52" E to the place of BEGINNING and
containing 3.436 acres.
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #.36.11-02-01,01 to be rezoned
from R-2 to R-3, The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeasterly comer of Tax #36.11-02-.36, said point also located on
the westerly boundary of Tax #36,11-02-04; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36,11-02-04 and
with Tax #36.11-02-36, N 720 48' 44" W, 14.56 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax
#36.11-02-.36 and with a new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01, N 09045'
10" E, 31.3,61 feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax #36.11-
02-0.3; thence continuing with said parcel for the following 2 courses; thence S 030 .36'
.30" E, 7.73 feet to a point; thence S 070 50' 30" W, 13 L.3l feet to a point, said point
being the northwesterly corner of Tax 36.11-02-04; thence leaving Tax #.36.11-02-03 and
with said Tax #36.11-02-04, S 070 04' 26" W, 176.93 feet to the place of BEGINNING
and containing 0.054 acres.
~lnO^OI~lqJlI'~~H .gC.qoOClLO
\5
<::
liE aG~
~Q~ d~q
(!)Q."';o 0::!:2~
<:--:-~B: ~a~
;:u.::C\1 0-1
~v}~@~(,)61i~
(fj1B....~o<.:lj:;!<:.
i-r<)~N~~Ul:::i
53 N r.c L.J....., -1 G 0
;I:'-.,;.1;;0::Q::.q:.q:t:..J
[jL.J"ll::t!l Q~~
~~~ j:;!.q:;:.:j
:~(Q 2!~
I() l/j!-:o
o ;SQ:;
d
.q:
a
&
"4:,
f:1
0"" .I:ti
ffitci L
~a.:fq-;:--,
ClJf:?
":,<!/ij
:::;,;;:;
Is::
!;J~
0"-.:
.I:ti
~
{3
~
"'i
~
'"
.
,~
M
~
~
~..
/"r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1fJ. ~ I
;;;.~I
~ I
I '0
I 1D
-~ I
~ I
~ ~ I
~\ I
;;, I 0
~I
I
I
I
I 1E
I
,/C'-
/' Xl
, I
, ~
___ t .!.
N 6!f36'ZO" E 133.69 ~
~8
:>,: ~
;:::: I
~
.!.
-
UJ
""
. 1'1
_~ to (is ~
?';~~l::::~"",
@f;:j~!5i~~~
r...;:. -~ . .
4dU~!!'~~
......r:..:
o.
,....jCf.l
ot"-
io
NO
o .
IN
......l!':l
............
. '--'
(0
t'? .
~~
~g
E-<-.;j-
cr:i
009~-ZO_ AI .i''':!!:...'L N
/I 9ro# .\'111
--
~
;..,
.-
~
Cl
I '- ~
I :l Cl
I.,., I
-IN
1 ~I:l
. -
- I ~ ~
rei ~ ~
!jl \:; ~
"11 "';::::
I
I
I
;?~ d\
tr\ e: IAJ :,1. .... ;.,
lQ ~ t:)L "!
"'ifi'l~ ~1~1....' ~
~~ t:2 ;?;; 8ll;
Cj I ~:o?:I'. It,!) Cl
"" ~ ~ Ki ........ ~ ~ ~
~~ 1..~;!:Cl
<::) ~ <::: I............. S'< ~ I
d m ..... ~ lfj ~
t ~~ t:
try I- <.0
,9S'ft :ill....... ~ ~
. l,~
.....~
I
tjl~
'" 0 b
0 <')
0 ,... to
C\J "" II
~ 0
... ,-
Ol
.0
.2
"
0
ill
l-
..;
o
d
z
:i
:!;
o
o
w
-'
<(
o
III
'b
<l)
II
.
;:~:E
"''''0
"l'1'u
~~~
~~z
00""'
",..-Cl
~~V1
.. ..::E
,,",~:J
5""-'
I ~
Cl. -
<:
~
s
<(
u
Uf
~
~
~ ""
z 5
""' '"
:( '"
z :S
o :6
8rrlki
",(35
~ ~~-
"'~2
.. .<:
:gqo
'<tCl.C>:
c.JU)
~o::
~g
<'r
-~
Uo
0>--<
U')w-
U')>z
<g5~
zc.p-
Ci:lfQ>:'
Qw!:::!
~~o
~~~
.....:JWO::
DMP'(q)I'1 ~t.~ 1'9C~q~OtILO \ ,no
\OtILO\ LOOt\B6"IM. JP\,M
The following is a deed description for a portion of Tax #36.11-02-36 to be rezoned from
C-2 to R-3. The description is as follows:
BEGINNING at Comer #17 located at the intersection of Electric Road (Virginia
Highway Route 419) and Cove Road (Virginia Secondary Route 780); thence leaving
Virginia Highway 419 and with Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N 590 18' 46" E,
l4K84 feet to Comer #18; thence N 40045' 50" E, 137,08 feet to Comer #19, the actual
point of BEGINNING; thence continuing with Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N
09038' 23" E, 20L8l feet to Comer #20; thence N 1 r 19' 42" E, 103-41 feet to a point;
thence leaving Cove Road and with the new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36,1 1-02-36
for the following.3 courses; thence S 800 14' 50" E, 252.67 feet to a point; thence with a
curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 900 00' 00", a radius of
120.00 feet, an arc length of 188,50 feet, a chord of 169,71 feet, and bearing N 540 45'
10" E to a point; thence N 090 45' 10" E, 347,20 feet to a point, said point located on the
southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36,11-02-01,01; thence continuing with said tax parcel,
S 72048' 44" E, 14,56 feet to Comer #2, said point located on the westerly boundary of
Tax Parcel 36011-02-04; thence leaving Tax #36.11-02-01,01 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-
02-04,8 07004' 26" W, 740.04 feet to Corner #3, said corner located on the westerly
boundary of Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01; thence leaving Tax Parcel.36, 11-02-04 and with
Tax Parcel 36,15-01-01, S 370 42' 00" E, 8.33.90 feet to Comer #4, said point being the
northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36,15-01-02; thence leaving Tax parcel .36,15-01-01
and with Tax Parcel 36.15-01-02, 8480 59' 59" W, .30L96 feet to Corner "A"; thence
with the new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36,11-02-36 for the following 21 courses
and leaving Tax Parcel 36,15-01-02; thence N 250 24' 0.3" W, 49,86 feet to Comer "B";
thence N 000 04' 02" E, 1736 feet to Corner "C"; thence N 050 10' 45" W, 27.70 feet to
Comer "D"; thence N 33044' 2.3" W, 1 L5l feet to Comer "E"; thence N 860 25' 51" W,
24.46 feet to Corner "F"; thence N 470 13' 00" W, 12.97 feet to Corner "0"; thence N
120 09' 46" W, 17.94 feet to Corner "H" thence N 440 16' 58" W, 18.99 feet to Corner
"I"; thence N .310 .31' 45" W, 25,78 feet to Corner "J"; thence N 320 45' 55" W, 23.40
feet to Corner "K"; thence N 5404.3' 48" W, 23.99 feet to Comer "L"; thence N 32039'
14" W, 34,16 feet to Corner "M"; thence N 340 .35' 40" W, 30.95 feet to Comer "N";
thence N 72032' 26" W, 2K05 feet to Comer "0"; thence N 52054' 46" W, 21.46 feet to
Corner "P"; thence N 400 17' 28" W, 34.99 feet to Corner "Q"; thence N 51020' 49" W,
16.3.16 feet to Comer "R"; thence N 600 52' 05" W, 225.23 feet to Comer "8"; thence N
360 18' 10" W, 176.40 feet to Comer "T"; thence N 180 58' 08" W, 144.44 feet to Comer
"U"; thence N 05030' 08" W, 113.00 feet to Comer #19, the actual point of
BEOINNING and containing 1 1.199 acres.
I IDo4s~g(:-~'H9C~Qo9CILO
I
E:i
<:;
J
~
.!.
-
~
~ l-
I=:: Cl~~
~C C5E::2:l
OO::::E ~tI)~
eel ~ ~ ~ LLI C5 ~
~U:lli: :>-.1::>-:
~ViI,\Jc.t<)8~~..
~ cr~~(!)~
tI)~""'ol2~<n
t:~~t;j 3t5o
!:!l[Q2~t:l'<l;<l;~
a~'~~ ~; ~
C3;;JG:i f':~O
<l;f..iG:l ~~~
C) _~o
0) Vj"'C~
>- (.)
,
,
o
t:O
/:'-
~
~
0.::
lu
.
.?!
. ~
~88~11;~ <<:
Q ~~~:::l~:e
0~~~~~~
>-
>-
'UJ
u"'"
""'-
C/Jp:::
:"!!;:
>-)5::;
,~
~--
o
0.::
f:2
o
(.)
~
'''.. .... '..../
<::;/ :~:''I
,1'..;;
a _1'....
0-
-06'. /0.
1.1> '.--0."
;s;..
<%J
~
..y +~
-q,
-c1<~
'<PJ'
~
4
-:\'F-
~
~
74.
~'% ru
~~~
&,7
'7~
\~
12.
~
~
it
~
~
rg
# ~
~~
C\lt:l
~~
j;
~
~~
: ~
~
8
8i
I
<3
J
~
~
>.;:
~
....-
.-
\
\ -0
\
\\~ '\,
"'i
\ .-
..
..
"
..
..
b
o
N
o
b
o
N
I,\J
~
co
o
o
C\I
o b
~ Ri
t3 JI
.-
.....
.-
:u
.0
.8
o
o
e-.
~
tIi
o
z
ill :ll
I- ::;;
<C 0
o 0
ill
...J
<C
()
Ul
~U1:a
;~o
'T":'~
~~~
~~~
~~C)
~~~
z~3
~"-~
"- "<
:a
~
UJ
~ <0
Z S
> ;;
~ :;;
o ~
t;:,~~
a5~5
:::;""'ui
;;:x'-!
co~~
~qd
"""-'"
b
o
'"
Uti)
. c::
o.....w
~.~
~~
O~<
~s:z
=<[3~
Zcr-
W~?:
C::HLi W
~~~
,ZO
1-\ W c:::
~
<C
(J
(J1
DMp-g c~~~u '9C'qo 9UW,JnS'OCIL9 'L09 ~,sOW.' JP\'M
~ I004"98.~'H '9B-qOOBltO
~
<: I-
g oS?~
0:::0 6~~
00::': Q::V)Ql
(:)Cl..tdlE luCS~
<:-;:::?li: :S:-.lS
~Vi2GJ~8~~
01"<1-'1<: t!l~~
"<I-'-1of2<:Vlb
I-tQ';N 0-
i'5r-.:tQ~t'\l-.lC,!;JR
-tQC';1.....u'<:('<:(....
~~~(:) o::':f\:.l
ki <: L,"I '<:( :::c:
(j::.:i:;J t-:::mO
"'l;~lIJ ~S~
0) E:~o
OJ Vl-q;Q::
..... U
.....
.....
<(
~ ~ l€ i!ll R ~ }... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "ic ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; 8
~ ~ en ~
0) ~ K ~ ~ K ~ '!i t1 :.::.1 ~ ~ ~ ;:t; ..., ~ !d :t ~
~ (/) "'" ~ t'; ~ ((l "
is - .... -
I ~ l.I.l Ell: iil:: iil:: ~ElI: Ell: Ell: Ell: iil::ElI: iil:::r: :t: :it: :it: :t: ~ Ell: Ell:
.... t!) . ~ . ~ . . . 18 ~ . . . ~ . ~ . . . . jg ]g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ "'" ((l ~ '" :g I;)
I ~ ~ Sol ~ ~
~ ill ~ I;) ;:I: ~ ~ ~ (Q t:i ~ ~ ~ ~ llli 'f...: ~ t1 II;] ~ ~
z- r- r- z-
:a: :.Q :is :g l:3 ~ "'" ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~ ;:!j ~ &:j ~ 1B ~ ~ ~ :g
2 :;;::;:: :;;::;;: :;:: :;:::;;: :;:: <:: :;:: :;:::<:: :<:::;;: :;;: :;:: :;:: ;;e:<:: :<:::;;:
!II:
!I ~ or (,,) Q ~ It., C,!l ~ J; .." ~ -l ~ ~ 0 l1.. 0- ~ ~ I- :::, ~
:::J '<C cb ~ a1 J. ..!. :J: :k 6 ti. ~ ..L :!
".....--, -;:::: c;:;
~ '~ ~ b ~ b b 18 ~ 8 ~ I I ;;. ~ b ~ 1:;~
tu '" ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ O;j
O'l "'" <::> <::> II;] <::>
riI j::'!; ..;' c:i ...; oj ~ to c:i u) K c:i <:;j ~ ~ ~ <'\i "" to K ~ c:i ..., '..;'<.i
ig ;Ji ~ t;j ;:t <=> :t ~ 2 ~ <::> :t :2 g e2 t")-..::
"'l U"J oj 2i .....f::!
~ ~ ,..,
>-:
~ ~
ki:::: ki:::: s Ski s :::: s s sOl:: s :::: ki kJki kit.u t.u II
.... t!> ~ . . . '1-.. . . . . . . ~ c . . . , "c:, . . , , 4:
.... ~ 55 O'l "'l U"J ~ <L) ::? <0 "" ..... C> ~ ... ~ '" ~
<:: S'I !"'l ."'" ::* .!"> !"'l s::> !'1 !'1 .0 .:<l" .1.(') S'I S'I tFl
>- 02: to "l- t'\! 0) ..... ... ..... b::. ..... ~ lB 'in <0 ~ ~ tB tQ I.(') to 0, "<t' ~ <0
It ~ ~ p ~ \0 OJ N :- \C"J N ~ !,") t- ,. !,") l- \0 !,") ;;:;
~ ..... ..... ';f it ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 8i <=> g) !;:c "- ~
'It co <:> t") "I- 0 "'l "'" <:> N
~ (I') (I') tI) tI) tI) (/1 <: <: tI) tI) <: <:: <:: <:: <:: <: <: <:: <:: <: <: <: ~
:;::) II
0 ..... ~ ::? "'" 1.(')<0 ..... C>::l 0> <:> ~ !:::j "l:
Ql ~ 1 ... "t- In <0 I'- C>::l Ol 2 ..... ~ ..... ..... ..... ;:c I "'l I~
I ~ I I I I J, I S: .!. ~ I I I I I f:j"l:
"'l "t- IC) <0 1'--. O'l ~~ ~ ~ ~ <:> ~
..... t'\l
t\l
Pt,
o
t\l
E-t
~
tIi
a:l
o
o
C\l
o w
<') Z
,.:. 0
o Z
tu
-C
.s
u
o
d
z
ill ::;:
l- :::
<: 0
Cl 0
w
-'
<:
Q
en
~u"1~
;:;;:0
'-'I'L!
~~k!
__z
00"-'
..,...,.0
!:J:~Vl
.. .. ~
z~:3
O"-@l
T -'
0:: -
~
.:.J
~
u:,
~ 5
w ..,.
> N
i s
o ;;
t;;,~~
cE2i>
~Nw
~X'"
tD~2
~c:ia
..,.0..""
~~
o...C:Ll
gf~
~9"
-~
vo
0>-<<
~g:z
<:~~
:z;cr-
l::J:J~?:
C\C:Ll~
CI)~o
:E_Z
:;::,d<
,zo
--' C:Ll 0:::
6MP'9B'~'WIJB.qOOnL 0 \ ""0 8~LO \LOO ~\g6UI"'. JP\''''
,-'
" \..:.:...-----.:.::~;.,_...~.-:~7~~\ !<."'//.r7 / / /. /-';','';/1':'' ~:.~.;:~,/,/ ///
/
CONCEPT PLAN
Proposed land
Zoning Am
c-, 7.8aups
"-, 23.6aaes
TOTAl 31.4aaes
Cove Road properties - Roanoke County. Virginia
,Applicant: Edward Ro~ Properties, Inc.
DatC!; October 5, 2008
T"""
Q)
c..
~
J-
0>
C
.-
"'C
.-
:J
a::l
s
Q)
.-
>
+""
C
o
L.
LL
N
Q)
c..
~
I-
0)
c
.-
"'C
.-
::::J
co
c
o
~
eu
>
Q)
W
L-
eu
Q)
~
('f)
Q)
c..
~
J--
C)
c
.-
"'C
.-
::J
III
, ~
n:
I ~l.
~I
~,I
c
o
~
CO
>
Q)
w
!....
CO
Q)
~
/
I : .~
\ I
~ ~'
I l
j I
D~\
I
n
r
,~
.
C"')
Q)
Q.
~
I-
0>
c
.-
"'0
.-
::J
co
c
o
.-
......
CO
>
Q)
w
Q)
"'0
.-
Cf)
~
"'0
C
co
N
~
"r"
en
CD
Q..
~
l-
e>
c
.-
"'0
.-
:J
OJ
c
o
:+:i
CO
>
CD
W
CD
"'0
.-
Cf)
Tax Map No.
.36J 5-01-02
.36.15-01-01
.36.11-02-17
.36.11-02~16
36J 1-02-15
36J 1-02-14
36.11-02-13
.36.11-02-12
REZONING APPLICATION
EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES, INe
LIST OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
Owner & Address
Larry G. and Ida Jane E. Conner
6012 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Jack C. and Rose L Garst
5645 Plain View Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
Jack C. and Rose L. Garst
William C. and Stephanie Y Hill
56.33 Plain View Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
Tristan M. Robertson
5619 Plain View Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
Tristan M. Robertson
Colleen M. Coleman
5617 Plain View Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
James W, Koiner
5607 Plain View Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
{1I//22650.I.I09694-00001-01}
36.11-02-11
36Jl-02-l0
36.11-02-09
36.11~02-06
.36.11-02-05
.36.11-01-11
36.11-01-10
36.11-01-09
36.11-01-08
(1I1122650-1.109694-00001-0I)
Luther .T., Jr- and Martha A. Garst
6150 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Luther J., Jr. and Martha A. Garst
Luther J " k and Martha A. Garst
Luther J.,.k and Martha A. Garst
Steve A. and Debra L Thomas
204 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Gladys C Weddle
6215 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Ronald G. and Dora Jean Thomas
6231 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
Robert G. Ronk
6247 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
George H. and Berna C Franklin
6263 Cove Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
2
J~~~
s~i5:::~
~€H~
~~~I~
i
"'
Kb
z""lx'" 4-J
" OJ
Q) ~
0>0 0
LLO
O. 0
LJ"")
0 l/)
l{) eu
r--
::J
0 OJ
0
l{) .!:
U
C
0
l{) T"""I
N
. .
l{) OJ
N
..-
eu
0 u
U)
.
U
c
en
(])
.-
t
(])
c.
0
s....
CL
(])
en
0
~
"'C
s....
co
~ \.0
tttUn: li(nill 0
"'C 0
f'IWJi H II' · W N
.) 1[' m:.lu ·
Hf"1 f Im!Pl1 .!:
ffi "I ~ifi,! h!litJ 1 U
; lilJiiih UiJ!H! ~ L-
eu
~lh:iiJt 1UHili I :;E
III!! itl I liil ! OJ
jiltl!) JhHh j 4-J
eu
0
"
~
tltft,,_
1'.11I11,
I '
L!~,j
:L~\ - \1
H"....
ftlU.
~
'J
I, IP~
I
L_
II lJ
II
D
ti
'}
~ ~ ,I ~~~t! -.'-' ~'.'-fl"
,:.-.:}( _ 1_ :t1..:
. .
~:, -
~lIIo1:'I:I ti.' .
L<I I)
foI ~....
"
J
"
tit.
a
f~
~ / ~
L.i j.
.r.I
",
fl'fl
EI
",,,,
II:
IJ II
f I
l'
, J
-...
,. ,..
~ )
~l
t.L I '. 1r
'- i."
[. J
1.1
~r'i~
.--01 iiOoI
, ,.
J
to'
~\,~ r~
.
, 'J I
t IH
~
u.
~
c
......111 ~
,r ii
\1 'r;JU
...~
"'"-
~,
."
. .
,~.
,I ~.
..
',' ~ ..
.l~
;~
..
.1 ~\
~
'L
,,,.
'........
'.
"7
,
~("~~'-tI
f:?l!{
,t.1;,..,
"~
I
I
L.- _
I
"'.
.}.".
~
<:: " :i-...
~ ~ r"
"',
. ...
r. . 0:'
Ii) ..':'
11'
'-' ".<)
,. ;:0,
~ ....
!'- ~(,
~; ,"
:. ~
, " i
~Il
:,
"
\. 01." ,;,., "%
",01 .'~
"
~
II:.i {50
~
, "
f -:
";
j.
'.~~
,lJ
!
tl ..,
r:J:~
.z{i
~ ~ ~ .~
~
"
1:1 ;
. II ts'
r..~
l~'o
'tJ' ~
.:2 ....,~ ~
~ ,. 'fl"
.,.
~"'.
,
.. '
,
/
(:'
IJ
'.,
t
j
I ~rnT
r
I
a
-.;.-
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO BOX 3071
SALEM , VA 24153-0560
DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
November 13, 2008
Ms. Becky Meador
Roanoke County Planning Department
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Faxed 540-772-2108
RE: Rezoning - R-2! C-2 to R-3! C-2 with Conditions
Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
Proposed Land Use - Apartment Development and Unspecified Commercial
Cove Road- Route 780
Dear Ms. Meador:
We have reviewed the above mentioned rezoning request and offer the following comments:
1. The proposed rezoning will increase the potential traffic generated from the site. This
project is being reviewed in accordance with ~ 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the
Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24 V AC 30-155. A comment letter under
separate heading has been provided by the Department for the required Traffic Impact
Analysis.
2. With the change in use, the VDOT Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways
should be adhered to where applicable. This would include meeting minimum sight
distance requirements.
3. The current posted speed limit along Cove Road is 40 mph. The minimum required
intersection sight distance is 445 feet. A concept plan was included in the rezoning
package for our review. Based on the approximate entrance locations in the concept plan,
the sight distance at the first entrance traveling east on Cove Road from Electric Road
appears to be adequate looking to the left but may be inadequate looking to the right. The
sight distance at the second entrance traveling east on Cove Road from Electric Road
appears to be adequate looking to the right but may be inadequate looking to the left.
Sight distance in both directions for both proposed entrances should be field verified and
measures taken to ensure the required sight distance is obtainable.
4. A left and right turn lane warrant analysis may be requested by the Department during the
site plan review stage. This will depend upon but is not limited to the projected traffic
generated by the site, the existing traffic on Cove Road, and the accident history adjacent
to the site.
5. Upon review and approval of site plans, a land use permit will be required for work
within VDOT right-of-way. Information regarding any changes to the existing drainage
system should also be included for review.
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Ms. Becky Meador
November 13,2008
Page 2 of2
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Thank you.
Sincerely,
;1-: (( ~
,.
(Jut ) Scott A. Woodrum, P.E.
Staff Engineer
VDOT, Salem Residency
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO BOX 3071
SALEM, VA 24153-0560
DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
November 13, 2008
Mr. Philip Thompson
Deputy Director of Planning
Department of Community Development
County Of Roanoke
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mr. Thompson:
In accordance with ~ 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis
Regulations, 24 V AC 30-155, a traffic impact analysis was prepared by HSMM I ABCOM for the
proposed Rose Cove Road Properties dated October 2008. This report was submitted for the site
plan on behalf of Edward Rose Apartments. We have evaluated this traffic impact analysis for
compliance with the above noted code and offer the following comments:
1) The volumes shown on Figure 3.1 for intersections 6 and 7 do not match the turning
movement counts in Appendix B.
2) It appears that a growth rate of 1.25 percent compounded annually was used on Route 419
and 1-81 instead of the recommended 1.5 percent.
3) The WB left turns and right turns are switched for intersection 6 for the PM peak hour in
Figures 4.1 and 4.2. This error is carried through on the buildout figures and the analysis.
4) For the analysis of the background and build conditions, the heavy vehicle percentage
should be assumed to be the same as the existing conditions. Where the data shows a heavy
vehicle percentage greater than 2 percent, the higher percentage should be used for the
background and buildout traffic.
5) The AM peak hour trip generation used 250 apartment units instead of the 252 listed in the
narrative of the report and shown on the proposed site plan.
6) For the assisted living land use, a rate of 0.22 for the PM peak hour should be used (see p.
488 of the ITE trip generation manual).
7) The rates for the general office land use should be used to compute the trip generation. The
equations give an unreasonably high volume for this size general office land use. The AM
volumes were generated using the number of employees equation instead of the square
footage equation (p 1159).
8) Medical office land use PM peak computation used the PM peak hour of the generator
instead of the peak hour of the adjacent street (p 1192).
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Mr. Philip Thompson
November 13, 2008
Page 2 of2
9} An incorrect rate was used for the PM peak hour for high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant
land use. .
10) The PM peak hour for day care center should be computed using the equation for the peak
hour of the adjacent street (p 1037).
11) Pass-by was only computed for the PM peak hour. A 40 percent pass-by trip reduction is
not allowed for a high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant. The 40 percent trip reduction is for
fast-food restaurants. A pass-by rate for a high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant was not
included in the scoping document.
12) All of the AM and PM volumes are swapped for intersection 8 in Figure 6.2. The PM SB
tlnu should be 25 vehicles.
13) The volumes in the HCS analysis for intersection 4 for the design year 2015 Build AM and
PM do not match the volumes shown on Figure 7.2.
14) The volumes for the EB left and right turns are switched at intersection 6 in the PM peak
hour existing conditions HCS analysis.
15) There was no signal wmants analysis to go with the reconunended signal at the intersection
of Route 419 and Cove Road.
16) The intersections of Route 419 and the NB ramps and Route 419 and Cove Road are in
close proximity to each other. The analysis of these two intersections should be performed
in the same model to analyze the interaction of two signals.
The correction of these items will require the report to be resubmitted. We would be glad to meet
with you and the engineer if that would be beneficial. Please let us know if you would like to
schedule a time to meet on this project.
I ask that you mange to have VDOT's comments on the traffic analysis included in the official
public records on the proposed project as well as placed in the case file for the rezoning
application. ht addition, the traffic impact analysis should be placed in the case file for the
rezoning application. VDOT will also make these documents available to the general public.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
./~a7/~
Scott A. Woodrum, P.B.
Staff Engineer
VDOT, Salem Residency
bkb/ cc: Mr. Arnold Covey -Director Community. Development, Roanoke County
cc: Ms. Teresa Becher, P.E. - Transportation Engineering Manager, Roanoke County
cc: Mr. Michael Gray - VDOT Salem District Planning Manager
cc: Mr. Christopher McDonald, P.E. - Southwest Regional Traffic Engineer, VOOT
cc: Ms. Anne K. C. Booker, P.E. - Assistant Regional Traffic Engineer, VOOT
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO BOX 3071
SALEM, VA 24153-0560
DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
December 23,2008
Mr~ Philip Thompson
Deputy Director of Planning
Department of Community Development
County Of Roanoke
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, \TJ\ 24018
Dear Mr. Thompson:
In accordance with 915.2-2222.1 ofthe Code of\Tirginia and the \Tirginia Traffic Impact Analysis
Regulations, 24 \T J\C 30-155, a traffic impact analysis was prepared by HSMM I ABCOM for the
proposed Cove Road Property Development dated December 10, 2008. This report was submitted
as part of the rezoning request on behalf of Edward Rose Properties, Inc. We have evaluated the
second submission of this traffic impact analysis for compliance with the above noted code and
have the following comments:
1. The growth rate at the intersections of the 1-81 Ramps and Route 419 still appears to be
lower than the 1.5 percent listed in the report and agreed to at the project scoping. In
response to the previous comment on this issue, the response letter stated the existing counts
were considered to be from 2009~ Since the traffic counts were taken late in September
2008, this could be reasonable assumption. However it appears that this assumption was
made for these two intersections, but not for the remainder of the network. This assumption
should have been applied consistently for all intersections since the counts were taken at the
same time. In addition, this assumption should have been included in the report narrative.
The differences associated with this assumption range from zero to eight vehicles per
movement and should not make a difference in the results of the report.
2. The volumes used in the HCS analysis for intersection 4 for the design year 2015 build
conditions, both AM and PM periods, do not match the volumes shown in Figure 7.2. The
differences are small and should not make a difference in the results ofthe report.
3. There is a discrepancy between Table 8.2 and the narrative of the report. Table 8.2 PM
Peak Hour Left Turn Storage Requirements reports that the eastbound approach of
intersection 4 Cove Road and Green Ridge does not require left tm'll storage. In addition,
this table reports that the eastbound approach of intersection 7 Cove Road and Green Ridge
needs 100 feet of storage for the 2013 build scenario as well as the 2015 background and
build scenarios. The text below the table conflicts with these results and reports that
intersection 4 requires left turn storage, but no storage requirements are denoted for
intersection 7. The appendix does not include the analysis of the left and right turn
requirements. J\s a note, the analyses should have been included in the report~
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Mr. Philip Thompson
December 23, 2008
Page 2 of2
4. At intersection 6 Cove Road and Green Ridge Road, the eastbound left and right turn
movements for the PM peak hour were transposed between the existing year and the
background traffic volumes. This issue was not commented on in the first submittal. It
should be noted that the volumes warrant 100 feet of left turn storage under the existing
conditions as well as under design year 2015 buildout conditions. The development is
projected to add 25 vehicles in the peak hour to the westbound and eastbound through
volumes, but is not projected to add any left turn movements at this intersection.
HSMM I ABCOM has addressed all of our other comments from the October 3, 2008 submission
and no further submissions of the report are required. Clarification of the turn lane discrepancy
denoted in item 3 and the volume mor denoted in item 4 should be provided by the engineer.
The analysis also suggested a right turn lane and signal at the intersection of Route 419 and Cove
Road. The peak hour warrant was evaluated for this intersection. A full signal warrants study
would be required prior to signalization of this intersection being recommended. The SYNCHRO
analysis and the SimTraffic simulations show that there are no queuing issues southbound on Route
419 in the design year 2015 with the project being built. Under the same conditions, the northbound
approach at the intersection of Route 419 and the 1-81 north bound ramps would occasionally,
approximately four times per hour, have queues that would extend back to the intersection with
Cove Road. On rare occasions, it would spill back through this intersection. The analysis reports
that if Cove Road remains as a single lane approach, it is projected to operate at level of service
(LOS) E and F under the design year 2015 background conditions for the AM and PM peak periods,
respectively. With the addition of a right turn lane, the level of service for the left turn movements
from Cove Road remains poor at LOS F, but the operation of the right turn movement is improved.
Due to the poor level of service under the background conditions, the developer is not proposing to
fix this problem.
1 ask that you arrange to have VDOT's comments on the traffic analysis included in the official
public records on the proposed project as well as placed in the case file for the rezoning application.
In addition, the traffic impact analysis should be placed in the case file for the site plan application.
VDOT will also make these documents available to the general public.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Thank: you.
Sincerely,
./dl1tl.~
Scott A. Woodrum, P.E.
Staff Engineer
VDOT, Salem Residency
bkb/ cc: Mr. Arnold Covey -Director Community Development, Roanoke County
cc: Ms. Teresa Becher, P.E. - Transportation Engineering Manager, Roanoke County
cc: Mr. Michael Gray - VDOT Salem District Planning Manager
cc: Mr. Christopher McDonald, P.E. - Southwest Regional Traffic Engineer, VDOT
cc: Ms. Anne K C. Booker, P.E. - Assistant Regional Traffic Engineer, VDOT
Land Use
_ Conservation
_ Rural Preserve
_ Rural Village
Village Center
Developrrent
. Neighborhood Conservalion
_ Transition
. Core
_ Principallnduslrial
Roanoke County
Department of
Community Development
N
Applicants Name: Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
Existing Zoning: R2, C2
Proposed Zoning: R3, C2C
Tax Map Number: 036.11-02-01,01.01,02,03,04,36
Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 31.4 Acres
6 October, 2008
A
Scale: 1" = 400'
Zoning
_AG3
_EP
_AG1
AR
_AV
C1
_C2
_ C2CVOD
11
_12
_PCD
_PRD
_PTD
R1
R2
_R3
_R4
RB
GB
_CB
M1
_M2
Roanoke County
Department of
Community Development
N
Applicants Name: Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
Existing Zoning: R2, C2
Proposed Zoning: R3, C2C
Tax Map Number: 036.11-02-01,01.01,02,03,04,36
Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 31.4 Acres
6 October, 2008
Scale: 1" = 400'
A
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 1 of3
SEC. 30-42. R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-42-1. Purpose.
(A) The purpose of the R-2, medium density district is to establish areas in the county within
the urban service area where existing low-middle to middle density residential development
(one (1) to six (6) units per acre) is primarily located and land areas which appear generally
appropriate for such development. These areas are consistent with the neighborhood
conservation land use category, and where public services warrant, the development land use
category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. This district is intended to provide
reasonable protection to existing single family residential neighborhoods, while accommodating
a diversity of alternative housing options. These areas are designated based on access to
roads, sewer and water, and schools with suitable capacity to accommodate development at the
stated density. Older neighborhoods where smaller platted lot sizes exist are also included
where opportunities exist for additional in-fill development.
(Ord. No. 042799-11, S 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, S 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-42-2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Emergency *
Residential Human Care Facility
Single-Family Dwelling, Attached *
Single-Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *)
Single-Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *)
Two-Family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Community Recreation *
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Minor
3. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower *
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 2 of3
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use
and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Multiple Dog Permit *
Townhouse *
2. Civic Uses
Adult Care Residences
Cemetery *
Crisis Center
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Family Day Care Home *
Utility Services, Major *
3. Commercial Uses
Boarding House
Golf Course
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings *
(Ord. No. 82493-8, S 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, S 2,4-27-99; Ord.
No. 042500-9, S II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, S 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, S 1,4-22-08)
Sec. 30-42-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet).
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
3. Lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 3 of3
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
5. The expansion of a legally established nonconforming structure into the required
side or rear yard shall be permitted provided the expansion does not encroach into the
required yard any greater than the existing encroachment.
(C)Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the
setback requirements for principal structures.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for
accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, S 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, S 8,4-26-94)
SEes. 30-43, 30-44. RESERVED.
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 1 of3
SEC. 30-45. R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-45-1. Purpose.
(A) The purpose of the R-3, medium density multi-family residential district is to provide areas
in the county within the urban service area where existing middle-high density residential
development (six (6) to twelve (12) units per acre) has been established and land areas which
generally appear to be appropriate for such development. This district is intended to coincide
with the development and transition land use categories contained in the comprehensive plan.
They are designated based on access to major streets, sewer and water, and schools with
suitable capacity to accommodate development at the stated density, and where parcel sizes
allow for well-planned residential development. The areas designated in this district are also
intended to serve as a buffer between less intensive residential areas and more intensive office,
commercial and industrial areas and districts. A variety of housing densities and styles is
encouraged in order to permit a diversity and flexibility in design and layout. Additional
standards are established to provide for amenities in higher density developments.
(Ord. No. 042799-11, S 1f., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, S 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-45-2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Emergency *
Multi-family Dwelling *
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Attached *
Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *)
Single Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *)
Townhouse *
Two Family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Community Recreation *
Family Day Care Home *
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Religious Assembly *
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 2 of3
Utility Services, Minor
3. Commercial Uses
Boarding House
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use
and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
2. Civic Uses
Adult Care Residences
Cemetery *
Crisis Center
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Major *
3. Industrial Uses
Landfill, Rubble *
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings *
(Ord. No. 62293-12, S 9,6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, S 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord.
No. 042799-11, S 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, S II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 042208-16, S 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-45-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet).
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 3 of 3
3. All lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
4. For minimum lot size and permitted densities for multi-family dwellings and
townhouses refer to Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C)Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the
setback requirements for principal structures.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for
accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 60 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, S 10,6-22-93)
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 1 of 5
SEC. 30-54. C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30-54-1. Purpose.
(A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service
related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or
large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county.
General commercial districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares
which serve large segments of the county's population. The C-2 district permits a wide variety of
retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with
the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the
comprehensive plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with
adjoining land uses.
(Ord. No. 042208-16, S 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-54-2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Multi-Family Dwelling *
Two-Family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary *
Family Day Care Home *
Guidance Services
Park and Ride Facility *
Post Office
Public Assembly
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Safety Services *
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 2 of 5
Utility Services, Minor
3. Office Uses
Financial Institutions *
General Office
Medical Office
Laboratories
4. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services *
Antique Shops
Automobile Dealership, New *
Automobile Repair Services, Minor *
Automobile Rental/Leasing
Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail *
Bed and Breakfast *
Boarding House
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
Communications Services
Construction Sales and Services *
Consumer Repair Services
Funeral Services
Garden Center *
Gasoline Station *
Hospital
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge
Kennel, Commercial *
Pawn Shop
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, General
Retail Sales
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 3 of 5
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
5. Industrial Uses
Recycling Centers and Stations *
6. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower *
Parking Facility *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use
and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Civic Uses
Adult Care Residences
Halfway House
Life Care Facility
Nursing Home
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Major *
2. Commercial Uses
Adult Business *
Automobile Dealership, Used *
Automobile Repair Services, Major *
Car Wash *
Commercial Indoor Amusement
Convenience Store *
Dance Hall
Equipment Sales and Rental *
Manufactured Home Sales *
Mini-warehouse *
Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center
Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service *
Restaurant, Drive-in and Fast Food *
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop *
3. Industrial Uses
Custom Manufacturing *
Landfill, Rubble *
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 4 of 5
Transportation Terminal
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Broadcasting Tower *
Outdoor Gatherings *
(Ord. No. 82493-8, S 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 022796-14, S 1,2-27-96; 042297-14, S 1,4-22-97; Ord. No.
042799-11, S 2,4-27-99; Ord. No. 102803-15, S 2, 10-28-03; Ord. No. 102505-7, S 2, 10-25-05; Ord.
No. 042208-16, S 1, 4-22-08)
Sec. 30-54-3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).
b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
a. Area: 15,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the
front building line.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard: None.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C)Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet,
including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased,
provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is
increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height
is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance.
b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure.
(D) Maximum coverage.
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 5 of 5
1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293-12, S 10, 6-22-93)
http://library6 .municode.com/ default/Doc View/12222/l/120/l23
1/22/2009
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2009
ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 16.3 ACRES FROM
R-2, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO R-3C,
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH
CONDITIONS (APPROXIMATELY 12.4 ACRES), AND C-2C,
GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS
(APPROXIMATELY 3.9 ACRES) AND TO REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 11.2 ACRES FROM C-2, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO R-3C, MEDIUM DENSITY MUL TI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH CONDITIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE
OF CONSTRUCTING A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
CONSISTING OF AN APARTMENT COMPLEX (APPROXIMATELY
23.6 ACRES) AND COMMERCIAL USES (APPROXIMATELY 7.8
ACRES) UPON APPLICATION OF EDWARD ROSE PROPERTIES,
INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 11, 2008, and the
second reading and public hearing were held March 24, 2009; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter
on March 3, 2009; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of certain tracts of real estate as described below and
located in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed as follows:
(a) Tax Map No. 36.11-02-04 containing 10.350 acres is hereby changed from the
zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3C,
Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Cove Road (Virginia
Secondary Route 780), said point also being northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05; thence
leaving Cove Road and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05, S 3r 24' 22" W 438.65 feet to a point, said
point, said point being the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05; thence continuing with
Tax Parcel 36.11-02-05, S 390 21' 23" E passing the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-
06 at 90.00 feet, in all 276.91 feet to a point, said point being the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel
36.11-02-06; said point also located on the westerly boundary of Plain View Subdivision and on the
westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-09; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-06 and with Plain
View Subdivision, S 430 25' 00" W 959.48 feet, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax
1
Parcel 36.15-01-01, said point also located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36;
thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36, N 07004' 26" E passing
the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 at 740.04 feet, in all 916.97 feet to a point,
said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-01.02 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 for the following 2 courses: thence S 840 39' 30" E
120.66 feet to a point; thence N. 1 r 28' 30" E 550.84 feet to a point, said point located on the
southerly right-of-way of Cove Road; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and with the southerly
right-of-way of Cove Road for the following 4 courses; thence with a curve to the right which said
curve is defined by delta angle of 34018' 12", a radius of 531.23 feet, an arc distance of 318.05 feet,
a chord of 313.32 feet and bearing S 640 11' 35" E to a point; thence S 44027' 17" E 28.55 feet to a
point; thence N 450 32' 43" E 30.00 feet to a point; thence S 44027' 17" E 40.50 feet to the place of
beginning.
(b) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-03 containing 1.173 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780
(Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04; thence
leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-04-04 for the following 2 courses;
thence S 17028' 30" W 550.84 feet to a point; thence N 840 39' 30" W 120.66 feet to a point, said
point located on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-04 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 for the following 2 courses; thence NOr 50' 30" E
131.31 feet to a point; thence N 030 36' 30" W 7.73 feet to a point; thence with new zoning line
through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 N 090 45' 10" E 12.15 feet to a point; said point located on the
southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02; thence with the boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02,
S 840 28' 30" E 77.16 feet to a point; thence N 140 49' 30" E 390.82 feet to a point, said point
located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-02 and with Virginia Secondary Route 780 with a curve to the right which curve is defined
by a delta angle of 09039' 36", a radius of 531.23 feet, an arc length of 89.57 feet, a chord of 89.46
feet and bearing S 860 10' 29" E to the point of beginning.
(c) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-03 containing 17 square feet is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, said point also located
on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 ; thence leaving Tax ParceI36.11-02-02 and
with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01, S 030 36' 30" E 12.27 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-01.01 and with the new zoning line through the property of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 090
45' 10" E 12.15 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-
02; thence with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, N 840 28' 30" W 2.84 feet to the point of beginning.
(d) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-02 containing 0.81 acres is hereby changed from
2
the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of
R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780
(Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03; thence
leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, S
14049' 30" W 390.82 feet to a point; thence continuing with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 84028' 30"
W 77.16 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and with the new zoning line through
Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, N 09045' 10" E 362.10 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly
right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence with a curve to the right, which said curve is
defined by a delta angle of 09022' 17", an arc length of 83.08 feet, a radius of 507.96 feet, a chord
of 82.99 feet and bearing N 810 46' 29" E to a point; thence continuing with a curve to the right,
which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 03035' 54", an arc length of 33.36 feet, a radius of
531.23 feet, a chord of 33.36 feet and bearing N 8r 11' 45" E to the point of beginning.
(e) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-02 containing 0.342 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780
(Cove Road), said point also being the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01; thence
leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01 and with the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780
with a curve to the right, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 100 04' 56", a radius of
507.96 feet, an arc length of 89.38, a chord of 89.27 feet and bearing N 720 02' 52" E to a point;
thence with a new zoning line through the property Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, S 09045' 10" W 362.1 0
feet to a point, said point located on the boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03; thence leaving new
zoning line and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03, N 84028' 30" W 2.84 feet to a point, said point located
on the easterly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-2-01.01; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and
with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 N 030 36' 30" W passing the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel
36.11-02-01 at 251.45 feet, in all 329.74 feet to the point of beginning.
(f) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-01 containing 0.133 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780
(Cove Road), said point also being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02; thence
leaving Virginia Secondary Route 780 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, S 030 36' 30" E 78.29 feet
to a point, said point being located on the northerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 ; thence
leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 , S 890 36' 20" W 133.69 feet to
a point, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 780; thence
leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.02 and with Cove Road with a curve to the right which said curve is
a delta angle of 1 r 06' 22", a radius of 507.96 feet, an arc length of 151.66 feet, a chord of 151.09
feet and bearing N 580 27' 13" E to the point of beginning.
3
(g) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-01.01 containing 3.436 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of C-2C, General Commercial District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at a corner located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route
780 (Cove Road), said point also located on the southerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01;
thence leaving Cove Road and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01, N 890 36' 20E E 133.69 feet to a point,
said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02; thence leaving Tax Parcl
36.11-01-01 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-02, S 030 36' 30" E 263.72 feet to a point; thence with a
new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01, S 09045' 10" W 313.61 feet to a point; said
point located on the northerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36; thence with said tax parcel N 720
48' 44: W 339.60 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly right-of-way of Virginia
Secondary Route 780; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36 and with Virginia Secondary Route
780 for the following 2 courses; thence N 16034' 12" E 243.87 feet to a point; thence with a curve to
the right which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 32034' 20", an arc length of 288.77 feet, a
radius of 507.96 feet, a chord of 284.90 feet and bearing N 330 36' 52" E to the point of beginning.
(h) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-01 containing 0.054 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, to the zoning classification
of R-3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36, said point also located
on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04 and
with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36, N 72048' 44" W 14.56 feet to a point; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-36 and with a new zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 , N 09045' 10" E 313.61
feet to a point, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03; thence
continuing with said parcel for the following 2 courses; thence S 030 36' 30" E 7.73 feet to a point;
thence S or 50' 30" W 131.31 feet to a point, aid point being the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel
36.11-02-04; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.11-02-03 and with said Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04, S or
04' 26" W 176.93 feet to the point of beginning.
(i) A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-36 containing 11.199 acres is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of R-
3C, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District with Conditions.
BEGINNING at Corner #17 located at the intersection of Electric Road (Virginia Highway
Route 419) and Cove Road (Virginia Secondary Route 780); thence leaving Virginia Highway 419
and with Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N 590 18' 46" E 148.84 feet to Corner #18; thence
N 400 45' 50' E 137.08 feet to Corner #19, the actual point of beginning; thence continuing with
Cove Road for the following 2 courses; N 09038' 23" E 201.81 feet to Corner #20; thence N 1 r 19'
42" E 103.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Cove Road and with the new zoning line through Tax
Parcel 36.11-02-36 for the following 3 courses; thence S 800 14' 50" E 252.67 feet to a point; thence
with a curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 90000' 00", a radius of 120.00
feet, an arc length of 188.50 feet, a chord of 169.71 feet, and bearing N 540 45' 10" E to a point;
4
thence N 09045' 10" E 347.20 feet to a point, said point located on the southerly boundary of Tax
Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 ; thence continuing with said tax parcel, S 72048' 44" E 14.56 feet to Corner
#2, said point located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04; thence leaving Tax
Parcel 36.11-02-01.01 and with Tax Parcel 36.11-02-04, S or 04' 26" W 740.04 feet to Corner #3,
said corner located on the westerly boundary of Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01 ; thence leaving Tax Parcel
36.11-02-04 and with Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01 , S 3r 42' 00" E 833.90 feet to Corner #4, said point
being the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel 36.15-01-02; thence leaving Tax Parcel 36.15-01-01
and with Tax Parcel 36.15-01-02, S 480 59' 59" W 301.96 feet to Corner "A"; thence with the new
zoning line through Tax Parcel 36.11-02-36 for the following 2 courses and leaving Tax Parcel
36.15-01-02; thence N 25024' 03" W 49.86 feet to Corner "B"; thence N 000 04' 02" E 17.36 feet to
Corner "C"; thence N 040 10' 45" W 27.70 feet to Corner "0"; thence N 33044' 23" W 11.51 feet to
Corner "E"; thence N 860 25' 51" W 24.46 feet to Corner "F"; thence I'J 4r 13' 00" W 12.97 feet to
Corner "G"; thence N 12009' 46" W 17.94 feet to Corner "H"; thence N. 440 16' 58" W 18.99 feet to
Corner "I"; thence N 310 31' 45" W 25.78 feet to Corner "J"; thence N 320 45' 55" W 23.40 feet to
Corner "K"; thence N 54043' 48" W 23.99 feet to Corner "l"; thence N 320 39' 14" W 34.16 feet to
Corner "M"; thence N 340 35' 40" W 30.95 feet to Corner "N"; thence N 720 32' 26" W 28.05 feet to
Corner "0"; thence N 520 54' 46" W 21.46 feet to Corner "P"; thence N 400 17' 28" W 34.99 feet to
Corner "Q"; thence N 510 20' 49" W 163.16 feet to Corner "R"; thence N 600 52' 05" W 225.23 feet
to Corner "S"; thence N 36018' 10" W 176.40 feet to Corner "T"; thence N 18058' 08" W 144.44 feet
to Corner "U"; thence N 050 30' 08" W 113.00 feet to Corner 19, the actual point of beginning.
2. A portion of Tax Map No. 36.11-02-36 consisting of 3.895 acres, which is currently
zoned C2, shall remain in the zoning classification of C2.
3. That this action is taken upon the application of Edward Rose Properties, Inc.
4. That the owners, Baldwin-Swift Properties llC, Roanoke Airport Business Park llC,
Melvin L. and Pauline J. Ronk, and Estelle H. Ronk, lowell E. Bower, Eileen B. Edwards, and Alan
A. Huffman, Trustee, of the property have voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended
conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts:
(1) The property will be developed substantially in accord with the Edward Rose
Properties, Inc. concept plan dated October 3,2008, subject to any changes required by Roanoke
County during development plan review.
(2) As to the 23.6 acres to be rezoned to R-3 Multi-Family Residential District, the
property will be used only for Residential Uses, Multi-Family Dwelling.
(3) As to the 7.8 acres to be rezoned C-2, General Commercial District, the
property will be used only for one or more of the following purposes:
5
Residential Uses: Accessory Apartment, Home Occupation-Type I, Multi-Family Dwelling.
Civic Uses: Administrative Services, Clubs, Cultural Services, Day Care Center, Educational
Facilities - College/University, Educational Facilities - Primary/Secondary, Guidance Services, Post
Office, Public Assembly, Public Parks and Recreational Areas, Safety Services, Adult Care
Residences, Life Care Facility, Nursing Home, Religious Assembly.
Office Uses: Financial Institutions, General Office, Medical Office, Laboratories.
Commercial Uses: Antique Shops, Bed and Breakfast, Business Support Services,
Business or Trade Schools, Commercial Indoor Entertainment, Commercial Indoor Sports and
Recreation, Communications Services, Construction Sales and Services, Consumer Repair
Services, Hospital, Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge, Personal Improvement Services, Personal Services,
Restaurant - General, Retail Sales, Studio - Fine Arts, Veterinary Hospital/Clinic, Mini-warehouses.
(4) The exterior design of the commercial buildings to be located on the 7.8 acres
to be zoned C-2 will be consistent with the exterior design of the multi-family dwellings to be located
on the 23.6 acres to be zoned R-3.
(5) The required buffer yard along the eastern boundary of the property, between
the area to be zoned R-3 and the single-family residences in the areas zoned R-1 and R-2 to the
east, will be landscaped at the Type B, Option 1 or 2 level, as Type B is prescribed in Section 30-92-
6(A) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as in effect on the date of this Proffer of Conditions.
(6) The exterior appearance of the multi-family dwellings to be constructed on the
property will be substantially in accord with the drawings dated February 25,2009, and attached to
this Proffer of Conditions.
(7) Apartment complex identification signage shall be limited to one maximum 30-
square foot monument sign located aUnear each of the two proposed vehicular access points on
Cove Road, and those signs shall be no taller than six (6) feet.
(8) Any free-standing (pylon or monument) commercial site identification signage
6
shall be no taller than eight (8) feet and shall be placed within seventy-five (75) feet of the
southernmost vehicular access point onto Cove Road.
(9) The poles carrying lighting for the commercial area shall be a maximum of
fifteen (15) feet in height, and the light fixtures shall be directed downward.
(10) The poles carrying lighting for the multi-family development shall be a
maximum of fifteen (15) feet in height, and the light fixtures shall be shielded and/or directed
downward.
(11) The applicant will construct a right-turn lane on Cove Road, at the intersection
of Route 419 and Cove Road, as permitted by VDOT, that is approximately 200 feet in length with a
150-foot taper, in accordance with VDOT specifications for a rural collector road.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final
passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning
district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance.
7
i
W~,
l' ~
J ;
~~
\.~~ ~ ~ 'J ') ~ '.,' T17"
IJ r I "
IIJ- g
~ ~ I ow m ,.' \l~-:'" ..
_.
~ '1'1'111 //1/1 "/1 r r II I ,~,
I> I.NJ\ II 11/ H Ee
~^,:~ 'l'jll 11 'Jjl TjT I~
'. '1'1 'I "I/I'L II I ,',,' ~~:
IJ H-iJ III H-i H- . ~~
r T J I I 1 ~ J : JI;li~
~ jliij~ ~ "'i:~._: ~,.
JI ~ 111 " ..'
.' IJI1ll1J nj II rn .- - I f'/ I I ~I , ~~ ~
! /,~tr 71 I? lIB I: - ~~ '
II I I, ,".:
~""""...... ,;"I...... " ,"x:x.'X '- . '- \. \.'\.
I
A
-
J-'~'~
, l
~
~:.~, ~~D\ ~ ~ ~
" -. ':\1 ~ " r
',~.:','~ ~ I~&~~"~-'\"'~"'.' "~~
ll~ tit- ,J .
..~ '~,~~ c~r;. -
~ , "1 .q.
" -", ~~,~, , ~
, ~. t,~ t\ ~t~~~
, '.~ ~ \! 'Mt.'
. '~t. ~ }1
, ' }I~:', ;~ ~~":" ..
.1 : .', ~ ;~,~, ,,', '
~; , r"
, . ') f. it '. e.
I" '~ hj~~" ~.JM
~~ ~ r~ ~~~~.t;
-~ ~i~;' .~
<~ '
~ Ii ~
,~, '
~~~i~~ ';"
~ ~ ~~1 ~
~, ~
_ j~ ~ ~'.l
1'1 '~
\ ~"~ .
\J='II(' ;., '
~ ~, "
~,..~ -
~~', '
~~d
.-. ~r
~,~'~:. ,
~' ,~.
~~ ~~
.j~
,~ ~ ,
~ .
~
"
ti :~l,;
-~; '~
;i{ JI
"'~ ~. -" ,
I. .a ,-.-,
~ ........, Ir
~ ~ I IT ~~ I
, ~
-, n~ ' ,
IJ ~MJ ~II
[ill
Q
~1
~1J'
~.
'f. . .
~.~
,t
li"',:'
~ ,I
()(' ~- n
-ot\!
'~lK~' I
JJ~
~~ :>
~" C
~~. e
~ LL
~~-
~ ~~:~
". "
ii:'"
'f' " ~ ... .,'. /~
< . ~(
~ /.; ,~
~~. ~
.,~I.".
,'\:~~. .~ l~ ~t
,.~~
~ 'If' ~
b I
.~l" ,
. . ~ ':\1 '1
!' j ,
~ k\. ~.. ~..~
~ \~~ ~~,!J
I.... t"..r I., IJj
I ~ tl ~ ~ ~a
~ ~ ~ ~~-:",~~
~..J: t4 i ~~ 1
,~~ .
"l~ ~ --,:
~l ~ ;
~I
~ "~, ,"~ ,
j ~' ~
~ " V I.
;, -.....
~ ~~.l
K . I.
~ ILl'
. ',.' ~~~
N ,-..
~~
"'CO)
co..
rn~
I-
<0 "-'"
U)
0)
C
"'C
::::J
CO
~
U
E
(/)
(/) Q)
c1::
Q) Q)
~ e~
~o..~
~ ~ L!)-
~~~
~"Ern
~~~
o "0 Q)
owu..
T
l~
!!flmn T
a...--
". t,
I /~
n.
] ,
00 ...-..
N
"'CQ)
Co..
rn~
1"-1-
'-""
~
....
L!)
~
en
0)
C
"'C
::::J
CO
C\
,
nTTlIll"g
Fi ==i =R1 ~
~.. ~ R11
!!!!!! III - ill
~1 ~. '\
~ 1\
1111111111111I'llllD 1
H.lJ I rrn I H l:D r I : llil I _ ~ I,
~~~ 'ilHuII ' ~E' I I .
:dL: I fRl II ..:. f 'II
!~
~
. ~. \',',
i :J,
I "
;;
~~~ ;~Ir:~' ~.
" ~~ ~ ,.' ~ ,
~ ", It r
i ~". ~ l,~ I.
~,;, ~ I.,
IJ,~ "
I~ .
'\~ 1
"\ : . I
I, ~
~
~l~
C
o
:;:;
rn
>
Q)
UJ
s....
rn
Q)
a:::
...............1......... ::::::
,II~II
I ..,..,- ~
........-
J
.~ .~
111 " I 'I I I
i I
I I II I lJJ Q
~ II ~~ VW ~ I.' _- ~
. ;'i r "'~
..l~ ,
I : i 1'1 ~
Ifljt :. 11m"
1:':~~1: ~ll1 ! ' 11_ -'
~ '.~ ~ 0' 4. 1
I.' I".;' ~ , iIiJJ 1I11]TllT _ _ .'
'1 r;~E IFRrI R _: .,
~" I -0 mr 1 'I ~ ~ . "
r: '11: I Q n-r- I " - tn:I~fJ ; ~
r ,~,'l IIII I II I r IIIII I .:r:qIJillI "
I~ li~~: 1:' :: I " I " I" " " ~ I . . . ~ ;
II ' ·
" II t " It ~'l' n
~l ~I ~.," 'l~ 1,1 III 1 Jl
~~:,~ .~r . ~ jl1t= == .
Q~ ~Hr,J~~ ~, t I II
II rill: " :
i 11~11'lf'I;~~~I"i,; . I _ _
!-l. .~~', ~ -~Ii n
~Im I I ~ FIT II I I
........-
U
E
(/)-
(/) (1)
ct
(1) (1)
~ e~
~o..~
rn ~ L!)-
"CON
rn 0:: >-
&"Ern
~~~
o "C (1)
owu..
, I) I. I
... II l I
. ~ I,
III
'I
[ I
l~
. ...
Jlr
..q- ..-...
"'C(")
c:Q)
rnc..
~
~I-
CI)'-'"
0)
.~
~
::::J
OJ
c:
o
:.;:;
rn
>
Q)
UJ
s....
rn
Q)
c:::
U
E
(/) ~-
c1::
<1.) <1.)
~ e~
rno...O
g-<1.)N
"C (/) I.{)-
~&~
O::"Ero
<1.) rn ::J
6~.c
()W~
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
h-J...
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Continued Second Reading and Public Hearing from March
24,2009 until April 28, 2009 - Petition of Foxhall Properties,
LLC to rezone 12.237 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial
District, to 1-2CS, High Intensity Industrial District with
Conditions and Special Use Permit, for the purpose of
operating an asphalt plant and construction yard located at
4127 West Main Street, Salem, Catawba Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY:
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
COLlNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 6'.{r'
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On Friday, March 6, 2009, Adams Construction Company, hand-delivered to Deputy
Clerk to the Board, a request to continue or postpone the public hearing on the above
reference matter scheduled for March 24 to April 28, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
This request is consistent with the Board's policy found in Resolution No. 10990-3 on
requesting continuances or postponements of previously scheduled public hearings for
a change in zoning classification.
Therefore, this public hearing has been rescheduled for April 28, 2009 at 7:00 o'clock
p.m.
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
5-.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution of congratulations to the Glenvar High School
wrestling team for winning the State Group A Championship
(a) Certificate of recognition to Jason Ayers for winning the
135-pound division state championship
SUBMITTED BY:
Becky R. Meador
Deputy Clerk to the Board
B. Clayton Goodman, III BCQr-
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Glenvar High School wrestling team won its second Virginia High School League State
Group A Championship in three years on February 21 , 2009. The team championship was
confirmed before the finals started, with a final team score of 123.
In addition to winning the team championship, Jason Ayers won the 135-pound division
individual state championship. The team is coached by Kevin Clifford.
Along with the wrestlers and their families, Coach Clifford and Assistant Principal Sonya
Cline will attend the meeting. All assistant coaches are invited as well. Superintendent Dr.
Lorraine Lange sends her apologies for having to miss this recognition because of a prior
commitment. David Wymer, Catawba District School Board Representative, and Assistant
Superintendent Allen Journell will attend to represent Roanoke County Schools.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDA V, MARCH 24, 2009
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL
WRESTLING TEAM FOR WINNING THE STATE GROUP A CHAMPIONSHIP
WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in
Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and
WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Wrestling Team won its second Virginia High
School League State Group A Championship in three years at the Salem Civic Center on
February 21, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the team championship was established before the final round began,
with a concluding score of 123, a remarkable 23 points over the second place team from
Strasburg; and
WHEREAS, the team had seven state qualifiers, six of which placed in the top
seven at the state tournament, where Jason Ayers won the 135-pound division individual
state championship by a 6-0 decision; and
WHEREAS, the Highlanders were also Three Rivers District and Region C
Champions and took first place in the Rural Retreat Invitational; and
WHEREAS, the Highlanders are under the dedicated leadership of Head Coach
Kevin Clifford, Assistant Coaches Brian Burke, Cecil Coleman, and Malachi Underwood
and managed by Ariele Rosmarino, Lauren Fulp, and Emily Fulp.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the
GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING TEAM: Derek Abdelnour, Trey Allen, Alex
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
h-J...
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Continued Second Reading and Public Hearing from March
24,2009 until April 28, 2009 - Petition of Foxhall Properties,
LLC to rezone 12.237 acres from 1-1, Low Intensity Industrial
District, to 1-2CS, High Intensity Industrial District with
Conditions and Special Use Permit, for the purpose of
operating an asphalt plant and construction yard located at
4127 West Main Street, Salem, Catawba Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY:
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
COLlNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 6'.{r'
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On Friday, March 6, 2009, Adams Construction Company, hand-delivered to Deputy
Clerk to the Board, a request to continue or postpone the public hearing on the above
reference matter scheduled for March 24 to April 28, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
This request is consistent with the Board's policy found in Resolution No. 10990-3 on
requesting continuances or postponements of previously scheduled public hearings for
a change in zoning classification.
Therefore, this public hearing has been rescheduled for April 28, 2009 at 7:00 o'clock
p.m.
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
5-.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
March 24, 2009
AGENDA ITEM:
Resolution of congratulations to the Glenvar High School
wrestling team for winning the State Group A Championship
(a) Certificate of recognition to Jason Ayers for winning the
135-pound division state championship
SUBMITTED BY:
Becky R. Meador
Deputy Clerk to the Board
B. Clayton Goodman, III BCQr-
County Administrator
APPROVED BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Glenvar High School wrestling team won its second Virginia High School League State
Group A Championship in three years on February 21 , 2009. The team championship was
confirmed before the finals started, with a final team score of 123.
In addition to winning the team championship, Jason Ayers won the 135-pound division
individual state championship. The team is coached by Kevin Clifford.
Along with the wrestlers and their families, Coach Clifford and Assistant Principal Sonya
Cline will attend the meeting. All assistant coaches are invited as well. Superintendent Dr.
Lorraine Lange sends her apologies for having to miss this recognition because of a prior
commitment. David Wymer, Catawba District School Board Representative, and Assistant
Superintendent Allen Journell will attend to represent Roanoke County Schools.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDA V, MARCH 24, 2009
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL
WRESTLING TEAM FOR WINNING THE STATE GROUP A CHAMPIONSHIP
WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in
Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and
WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Wrestling Team won its second Virginia High
School League State Group A Championship in three years at the Salem Civic Center on
February 21, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the team championship was established before the final round began,
with a concluding score of 123, a remarkable 23 points over the second place team from
Strasburg; and
WHEREAS, the team had seven state qualifiers, six of which placed in the top
seven at the state tournament, where Jason Ayers won the 135-pound division individual
state championship by a 6-0 decision; and
WHEREAS, the Highlanders were also Three Rivers District and Region C
Champions and took first place in the Rural Retreat Invitational; and
WHEREAS, the Highlanders are under the dedicated leadership of Head Coach
Kevin Clifford, Assistant Coaches Brian Burke, Cecil Coleman, and Malachi Underwood
and managed by Ariele Rosmarino, Lauren Fulp, and Emily Fulp.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the
GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING TEAM: Derek Abdelnour, Trey Allen, Alex
1
Asimakopoulos, Jason Ayers, Alex Burke, Kahlil Carazo, Andrew Cundiff, Jeremy
Dolan, Andrew Fridley, Corey Hancock, James Harvey, Tyler Haynie, Cole Herndon,
Zach Hill, Brandon Mayo, Jacob Noble, Tyler Tate, and Camren Wynn for an
outstanding performance, their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to
each other; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes
to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors.
2
Asimakopoulos, Jason Ayers, Alex Burke, Kahlil Carazo, Andrew Cundiff, Jeremy
Dolan, Andrew Fridley, Corey Hancock, James Harvey, Tyler Haynie, Cole Herndon,
Zach Hill, Brandon Mayo, Jacob Noble, Tyler Tate, and Camren Wynn for an
outstanding performance, their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to
each other; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes
to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors.
2
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
AWARDED TO
Jason Ayers
for winning the 135-Pound State Group A Wrestling Championship
'Y Jason Ayers, a junior at Glenvar High School, won the 13S-Pound State Group A
Wrestling Championship on February 21,2009.
'Y Mr. Ayers also placed first in the Three Rivers District, Region C, Highlander
Invitational, and Rural Retreat Invitational.
'Y Mr. Ayers completed the season with 37 wins and 11 losses.
'Y The Board of Supervisors congratulates Mr. Ayers upon winning this championship
and expresses its best wishes for success in his future endeavors.
Presented this 24th day of March 2009
/hu.
B. "~fd. %(J;>>.~
~ ,u-~.s> Go ~ r:..r ~
Richard C. Flora
ef,cvId;a. a m~.
Charlotte A. Moore