The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7/14/2009 - Regular Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda July 14,2009 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for July 14, 2009. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Our meetings are now closed-captioned, so it is important that anyone addressing the Board speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. We respectfully request all electronic devices be turned off or silenced. Thank you. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Reverend Monsignor Joseph P. Lehman Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, upon his retirement after thirty-six years of service D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Req uest to appropriate $195,204 to compensate the City of Roanoke for the fair value of the firing range and driving range (John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator) Page 1 of 3 2. Resolution granting a waiver under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's noise ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - miscellaneous of the Roanoke County Code, to Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC (Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator) E. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the vacation of portions of right-of- way of Brentwood Court on plat of Section No. 3 of Kingston Court, in Plat Book 11, page 39, of the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office, and retaining public utility easements, said right-of-way located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) F. APPOINTMENTS 1. Capital Improvement Program Review Committee (appointed by District) 2. Clean Valley Council (At-Large) 3. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Board (appointed by District) 4. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) G. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Resolution accepting Tolman Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System 2. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), administered through the Virginia Department of Emergency Management, to the Department of Fire and Rescue to support the Regional Technical Rescue Team 3. Request to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $143,832 for the Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) H. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Page 2 of 3 J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 2. Richard C. Flora 3. Joe P. McNamara 4. Charlotte A. Moore 5. Michael W. Altizer M. CLOSED MEETING N. WORK SESSIONS (Training Room - 4th floor) 1. Work session on restricting through truck traffic on Route 116 (Jae Valley Road) O. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION P. ADJOURNMENT TO JULY 21, 2009, AT 5:30 P.M. FOR A SPECIAL, JOINT MEETING WITH THE VINTON TOWN COUNCIL TO BE HELD AT THE VINTON WAR MEMORIAL, 814 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE, VINTON NOTE: THERE WILL BE NO 7:00 P.M. EVENING SESSION ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2009, AS THERE ARE NO ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS. THE AFTERNOON SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 3:00 P.M. AS SCHEDULED. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. t- } AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEE-rING DATE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, upon his retirement after thirty- six years of service SUBMITTED BY: Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III ~CB- County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, will retire on July 31,2009 after thirty-six years and one month of service to Roanoke County. He will attend the meeting to accept a resolution of retirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO JOHN M. CHAMBLISS, JR., ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER THIRTY-SIX YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, John M. Chambliss, Jr. was first employed by Roanoke County on June 11, 1973, as Assistant Finance Officer and was promoted to Assistant Director of Finance on July 1, 1976, where he served until July 1, 1978, when he was promoted to Director of Finance; and WHEREAS, he was promoted to Assistant County Administrator on March 1, 1986, and acted as Interim County Administrator, from July 1, 2008 through March 15, 2009, during which time he skillfully guided staff and departments through an extremely challenging budgetary period; and WHEREAS, Mr. Chambliss will retire from Roanoke County on July 31, 2009, as Assistant County Administrator after thirty-six years and one month of service; and WHEREAS, Mr. Chambliss, has been influential in the design and success of numerous projects which have benefited not only the citizens of Roanoke County, but those in the surrounding region as well, including the Community Policy and Management Team, the Regional Juvenile Detention Center and a new facility for the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and its governing Municipal Panel; and WHEREAS, Mr. Chambliss was responsible for the CORTRAN program since its inception, providing much needed public transportation for the elderly and handicapped citizens of the County; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, most recently, he was instrumental in the formation of the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority, serving on its Board and as Roanoke County's administrator for the site selection, development and successful completion of the facility; and WHEREAS, Mr. Chambliss represented Roanoke County on numerous advisory boards and committees to include the Court Community Corrections Program Regional Community Criminal Justice Board, the Regional Center for Animal Control and Protection, the Roanoke Valley Juvenile Detention Commission and the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority; and WHEREAS, he also served the community for thirteen years as a volunteer firefighter, reaching the rank of Volunteer Captain of Company 3, and currently serves as President for that organization; and, WHEREAS, throughout his tenure with Roanoke County, Mr. Chambliss has displayed the highest standards of integrity, honor, and character and has, with compassion, consistently improved the quality of life for his fellow employees and citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to JOHN M. CHAMBLISS, JR. for more than thirty-six years of capable, loyal, and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF -rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 14, 2009 Request to appropriate $195,204 to compensate the City of Roanoke for the fair value of the firing range and driving range AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: James R. Lavinder Chief of Police John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III ~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The County of Roanoke recently notified the City of Roanoke of our intentions to terminate the agreements for the joint operation of the firing range and driving range located near Dixie Caverns in the western part of Roanoke County. In each of the agreenlents, language was included whereby "the City will be reimbursed for the value of improvements and equipment for which the City has been invoiced and paid". The value of said improvements has been reviewed by the Roanoke City Manager, Roanoke County Administrator and their staff and the calculated value is $195,204. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is available in the Minor Capital Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriating $195,204 from the Minor County Capital fund for payment to the City of Roanoke for the fair value of the firing range and driving range. QInuttt~ of ~oannkt OFFICE OF THE COUNT'Y ADlvllNlSTRATOR P.O. BOX 29800t 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKEt VIRGINIA 24018.0798 B. CLAYTON GOODIvfANJ III COUNTY AD!\'llNISTRATOR TEL: (540) 772-2004 FAX: (540) 561.2884 cgoo d Ina n@)roanokecounty"a.gov June 3D, 2009 Darlene L. Burcham City Manager City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue) SW, Roorn 364 Roanoke, VA 24011 Dea r Darlene: Thank you for your letter of June 26 outlining the City's calculation of the fair value of $205,486. Upon review with staff, two items were noted for correction. The spreadsheet appears to have a mathematical error on the 2008 year line for both the firing range and driving range details. This change is minor and may be rounding based on the percentage used for the (PI (shown as 3.8%). Our staff also looked at the Table 24 identified in the notes and find that the percentage for 2008 should be 0.1%, not the 3.8% noted (see copy attached). While we understand the logic of the concern for the energy costsJ if we plan to deviate from the language of the agreements to determine the value of the cost using a CPI factor, we must be consistent in the application, meaning using the chart for all of the years. Attached is a revised chart showing the arnount using the CPI basis calculated at $195}204 as compared to your calculation of $205,468 for a net change (increase) from the original cost calculation methodology ($174/109) of $21,095. If you concur with this determination, please E-mail me your response and we will prepare a check for delivery to you. As I stated before.. the Board of Supervisors asked for the original agreement to be terminated and we consider the date of June 30, 2009 as indicated in the County's letter of March 26 to be the last date for training at the site. As we discussed before, the County will be closing the firing range for upgrade and repairs shortly after July 1, 2009. Our Board of Supervisors has asked us to consider opening the range to other agencies on a contractual basis once the repairs are completed, and we will be in discussion with you on this matter in the near future. I would like to thank you and your staff for working on this matter with us. I look forward to your response to the calculated settlernent so that we can prepare the check and finalize this matteL Sincerely, (~~ B. Clayton Goodman, III County Adrl1inistrator Attachment Table 24. Hlstorioal Consumer Price Index fot All Urban Consumors (CPI.U): U. S. olty average, aU Itcms~Contlnuod (1982.{l.4::; 1 0-0. unle~5 othecv,;se noted) SemIannual PerC()ot change ave,ages Annual ftom pl6vIous Year 151 2nd avg. Annual hall half Deo. avg. 1970 w 3B.8 5.6 5.7 1971 40.5 3.3 4.4 1972 41.8 3.4 3.2 1973 44.4 8.7 6.2 1914 49.3 12.3 11.0 1975 53.a 6.9 9.1 1976 56.9 4.9 5.8 1977 SO.6 6.7 6.5 1978 65.2 9.0 7.6 1979 72.6 13.3 11.3 1980 82.4 12.5 13.5 1981 00.9 8.9 10.3 1982 96.6 3.8 6.2 1983 + 99.6 3.6 3.2 1984 102.9 104.9 103.9 3.9 4.3 1985 10$.6 108.5 107.6 3.6 3.6 1986 109. 1 110.1 109.6 1.1 1.9 1987 112.4 114.9 113.6 4.4 3.6 1988 116.8 119.7 118.3 4.4 4.1 1989 122.7 125.3 124.0 4.6 4.8 1990 128.7 132.6 130.7 6.1 5.4 1991 135.2 137.2 136.2 3.1 4.2 1992 139.2 141.4 140.3 2.9 3,0 1993 143.7 145.3 144.5 2.7 3.0 1994 147.2 149.3 148.2 2.7 2.6 1995 151.5 153.2 152.4 2.5 2.8 1996 155.8 157.9 156~9 3.3 3.0 1997 159.{} 161.2 160.6 1.7 2,3 1998 162.3 1&3.7 163.0 L6 1.6 1999 165.4 167.8 166.6 2.7 2.2 2000 170.8 173.6 172.2 3.4 3.4 2001 1~6.6 177.5 177.1 1.6 2.8 2002 178.9 180.9 179.9 2.4 1 t 1.S 2003 183.3 184.6 184.0 ~ 1.9 2.3 2004 187.6 100.2 188.9 I 3.3 II 2.7 t 2005 193.2 197.4 195.3 3.4 I 3.4 2005 200.6 202,6 20 , .6 II 2.5 II 3,2 2007 205.709 2"08.976 207.342 4.1 2.8 2006 214.429 216.177 215.303 .1 I 3.8 2009 t . · Data not available. NOTE~ fnd&x app13GS to a month as a whole. not to any specific date. ~ QO en ~ & M r--.. mo *' \0 o it ~~ ,~ t8~ 1""0 dol ""0 NM ~ c: o .~ aJ > "C OJ ~ .S w CI: ~3 o ('0 ~~ H N ms ~ d~ ~ a~ e ij 11'1 ~ lOl ~ , ...t N, i ~ I ~ M ~ fl::t ~ Q) ~ ~ U) ~ 0 ~~~ ~gJ~ N m LIl ~ N lnO rl ~ M~ ~~ .ti~ ~ ~ (() ~ ~ (l") q- tn Ol N " ~ to 0) 00 ~ N M ,..... ~ N 00, m "" 'fl ~ ~.... 0) .q iii' ... ~ ~ (f) m Q ('i) C C'J t1"l m N 0 .~ ~ G c: -g 0 '0 c: J: ro ~ '0 0 OJ 'Q :;E s: \.. (\l U D- '0 QJ .... Q) QJ ~ :J ~ 0 ::3 a. ~ "0 ~ <V "'0 OJ -c QJ .. QJ u h ~ t; rtI "a -g co 'co "5 '(6 0 > u. ~ E u. -S .., ~ f ] OJ ('0 ~ aJ =' u ~ -S 0 +' U c ::i E ~ ('Q '^ ~ 10 ~ E co E ~ ~ ;J fJ 1;; ~ ~ a 8 ~ (lJ ~ 0 '~ ~ 2 U -J t.u 0 ~ c o I~ ~ o tJ C o li "5 u 13 ." C ~ ~ .5 s: u i ~ o w M c '3 o .c f.i'1 .... m E 8 o C "Q Q) .'::'2 ~ a: ~ c = 8 Q) 4- =' 0: ~~~ .~ ~ i (Q .~ ci u. ~~ 8 Ci: ~ ; ~ :~ ~~ ~ c CIJ OJ :c ::J 0 S~ c: o . .~ OJ (Q tlIO ,- t: U ~ ~ b.')QJ c: C 'C: - ._ C'O U. ::J C ~ u .5 111 QJ ~ ~ Q) Q) Vl ~ ;:3 c 0 Ei.X o ~ 0 'C .c u:V'J ~ Q} ti IV ~ "- 8 .s:::. ...., ('Q S ...., C <3J E ~~ ~~ .~~ u:& ~~~~g)~~~~ J:::' <<i c%' g g 81' ~' g ~ HMMM1-.NMNN tl)P::tOOQNq-Q)t:;~ Cigg~~~~~tO~ t/l N ,..... ~*' t-t*' ..r) (t)" v\ 00" ~~~~~SCjlf'.v) il)Vi'tnVi'rn';i1U)V)L(\ 1""000000000 "=tl't"-..,.........t'-oof'o-......~ ~ r--:- ~.. r-: r-: f'," r' l'o .. l'.' -tic~~~.!i~c ~~(g~rn~~~~ Of". HttiHV)C'\ILI')(() ~ ~~ t2 r;f gf ~ ::f m ~ rlrlrlrlrlMM ~~~~~9J~mfQ ~ U"i N'\ ;: ~.. ;r I.[)' ~ ~ ,....r....\D~fONO"'r-... M M ri I-l I-l ~ P'l t-tNM-=t~\Df'o(QO"l aoaogoooo ~~~~N~~~~ .&1 B ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ oocooooob ci~~~~~~~;d 1\ ~ n c.j d OJ ..... :3 0: o ~ u ~ ~ Co co 0 Eo "'C · c.o ~ ~ .~ ~ u. g ~ ~ ~ ~ :1 2 ~ Q} ~ ru '- ;g ~ Q) c ro C w> t: o aJ 'g ~ '0 ~ ~ ~Q) .~ C 'C ro o ~ c ~ u .5 1 ~I ~~ IV ii Q) 0.0 C ft' Cl: b.O c 'S 'C o ~~a~~~ g ~ ~ gJ ~.. ~.. N N N to ro (11 ~~~;~~ ~~~N~g NNN~M"'" ~-;;~~';f lrorommm 00000 cO ro cO co'" cQ Cit!~t!~ s~~~~~ MCQMNrom ggf8~gfo( NNNNNr'I Q) c co 0: ~~N~~~ fomt};M~M g g t6' ~N' ~ ~ NNN N~ c "$ 'C c ~~~t:;~g: ~~~~~~ QJI 1ti o ~I SS8f3o_0'S OIttU)l-l 0 omN~rio 1\ ~ o F' t-4 d ; 4J ~ :s ~ e o v ..., o c o "Q ~ ...., c c: 0 Q.I ',a E co ~:; g..c:! "0 ro ~~ '0 ~ 5 .~ Vl L. C I/) .Q := !2~ ::J VI U VI a~ Q,1 '+or ::3 0: o~u ~ ~ c: E 8 .g .~ ~ ~ UJ~co g ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~~ ~ .S ~ (1) "g(ijc w > E: o '+;j 111 nJ ~ '0 .c: Q,l ro \.. cr:: tIlJ a; c CJ :s ~ u. ;J c: ~ u E l ~I ~~ OJ ~ ~ aJ QJ V) b.O ~ c 0 ~ J: o ~ 0 ~~ ~ Q) 1j OJ '- '- 8 .c ..., fQ .5. ..., c: QJ E Q) a ~ 0 c: 0 &.~ ,r! ~ .~ Q) u.. 0.. ~ \ Oo);~o)N\I)\J)'-O ~~f'tw1~~~~~ ~ ci" i: 0 ~-. N a ~ 00 ~~~~~~~r:lr:J ~~~~~~~~~ ~Gfti~~~m~uf 1""'IMMt-f!""l:1-f UlU1rnli)roLOi.i1~V\ r"ocoocooo e::tt-o.",....."r--..,.....r-...c-... t-i' 1'0' ,,' ~ r' ,," ~.. f'." ,...: -.-t.......t""tt'"'lt"'te-<roi ---------- ~~fB~b\g-J~~~ ~~~~~~~~,~ ~~~~~~~C7\'" OU")q-(I)ONq-m~ Lfl.......OOVlNOlN(J)q- 0.. "'l. 0... ~.. \.CI ~ 00 ~ M ~ ~ ~ t;; ~ ~ ~~ ffi ~.. MM~Mor-It"'it"'t MNN')"1U')IJ)~OOm 888gggogg NNNMNNNNN ~I ~I ~~~~~~~~~ 8~~~~~~fag ONrlrOfON~rrici (l) 'P- :J a: o ->flJ U !! ~. c ~ 0 0 E 0 ~ co ~ ~ ~ ro ,CU 0) u.. 8 i ~ co u .2 a1 a; .5 z ~ ~ tI.O ~ '- ~ ~ Q) c ~ c w :> c o CJ .~ bJ).o c:: OJ ri. '- b.O d> .: 0 .f: ro C E c <( u .s 1 ]1 ~ ~ OJ b,) t:: ro 0:: ~ c: IS 'e o ~ , =:t~ro~~~ MrorlMOO 0" a) "'... en'" ...-c'" r-f OOOOO\ONN NNNC'1"I((l((\ S N t:1 t:t ('f) 0'1 M~~t:i~~ a3' ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~.. NNNNNr1 ,~ii~~ 00000 OOrhrhctSoo C!C!.t!~~ ~~~~@~ o 0\ (I) 0 0 N' ~re~~~~ C to ex:: ~~~~~~ OOr-iCNN taOCOfJ)q-NQ NNNNNN c :~ h o ~\I')u>"oocn 000000 ~~~~~~ d.l1 10 o ~I ~~~~~~ g~~~~g ciMN~(';O 0) ....,. ::J 0- E 8 ....., o c: o "0 V) .,., ~ c 0 QJ .~ E ro B-:; o~ "0 t3 .~ -g u V)- a .~ ~ ..... .9 ~ tJ 0 -5~ u CI) a~ OFFICE OF THE (llY MANAGER Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue. ~Vv. Room 364 Roanoke. VJ rg inta 24011 540~853~2333 \WlW. roanokegov.com ROANOKE June 26J 2009 B. Clayton Goodman County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke. VA 24018-0798 .1. Subject: Regjonal Firing and Driving Ranges Dear Clay: It was a pteas ure to meet with you and yo ur staff Wednesday to discuss the regional firing and driving ranges. Attached is a copy of the Clty's calculation of $2051486 as fair value due from the County under Paragraph No. 14 of the two Memorandums of Agreement. As we discussed, this amount includes a cost of living Index adjustment for the City's investment in the two regional facilities and depreciation of that investment. In exchange for payment of $205.486, the City will abandon the pending mediation process and vacate both the driving and firing range by July 1 r 2009. Until the City receives a response to this proposal. our public safety departments will continue to utiljze these two regIonal facilities In accordance with the Memorandums of Agreement. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely J Darlene L. Burcham City Manager City of Roanoke Pollco and Firing Range Computation Cost Mothod Cost 4571394 Accu mulated d epreoiat ion (283,285) Net book value 174,109 380/0 Estimated Fair Value Method Cost as adjus tad for CPI 539.822 Estimated depreciation (334.337) Est Imated fa i r val u e 205,486 380/0 985 ~ ~~a~!~UJ - 0: ~~~~NN QjU ..~~~ ~ !~5 ~~!~~&~~~ I;> ~ ~re1i!ijij ~~J ~~1 m \It- e E . ~ e a ~5;t' ~51 ~ 0 ~3~O~~~l~ ~~~~~I. :; ~ ... ~ ~ g~gN8$l~i ~iij~~~t; ~ ~ ~ u [Q I iiR J zJ -rT"'......~t-........ jN- ~~~ ~ ~~S fh VI- '" U) & &1) 5~~~~~~~~ g. I[~~~~ ~ IJ f/) ~I Go g :) D~ Qj CD Y 'r"- ,..: ,.: to: ...: t-: to: r-.... ,...~ li~ !l!tt&li ~ 8 :JJ lot .......t::.::..c~c~c if Q J ~~ -0 1) i4 ~ g I u 'It f ~ :::) ~6 ~!~~~FJ3~~ it ~~~~~. i n a. f i 'iiSO ~G e. .D - . ..~ ,vtti. ~ . j c: f:::~~~ft~~t;f! Ji ~fiil~~ :S ~ ~i ~! .....T"",...t"""~......,.... J a: ~ ~i ~I 1 s I~ as u 5 " w !;v> <C ~ i'~ "'~ ~~~~~~~~~ ! i i) ~j c j Ix ~~~t;~N8~~ :I t= 1$ ,,! ....._~1"",........~ ~ 5- gt~ i" g :18 !8 "I: .. ~1~:D R u:"" t b .~ Q w 'C :> lC2t 5 ~ 'Ve- r \0 8bN~88gt;~Q) ~~~~i~~ ' "'je JJ ~ 1:: ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~fij~101~ ;1J _ ~ W ~I: " "'J&~ t {l" g g'1 ~ u E e r- rig 0 ~- I: ..... . J ~I-RI i .9 * I ~ ~~~!~~~~ i;A'~~~~~ ~1J ii:~8i ] au _ON.-M flirio li::3~~~~~ t 0... >" :61 fi u z a ~0 ~ >>- '" ~i5Q ! ..8 N~5 €E ~ ~Ggs y ~I~CI j::: g2~n z 8 )i1Ja ~ 5 ffi u~ -R--.::J Is ~-a.~ !is I J , : .. ~. f Firearms Range City In lti a I Payment Shoot House Total Ten year straIght Une depreclatIon determined on a monthly (120) basls~ 177,050/120::: 1,475.42 per month Based on date of slgned contract (August 1998) (120 of 120 months explred) Based on date of opening (May 2001) (97 of 120 months expended, leaving 23 months) 177/050/120;: $lj475.42 per month times 23 months = Drlvlng Center City Payment Ten year straIght line depreciation determined on a monthly (120) basis. 280,344 / 120 ;:; 2,336.20 per mo nth Based on date of signed contract (A~gust 2004) (58 of 120 months expended, leaving 62 months) Based on date of opening (June 2004) (60 of 120 months expended, leaving 60 months) Total Due to the City based on Opening Date Payoff based on projected date of July 1.J 2009 March 24, 2009 $ 15 7,050 ~OO 20tOOOaOO $177/050.00 o $ 33,934~66 $ 33,934~66 $ 280,344.00 .. $144/844~40 $140.,172tOO $ 140,172.00A $ 174j106.66 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. D- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution granting a waiver under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's noise ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - miscellaneous of the Roanoke County Code, to Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III ~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMA-rION: Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC is requesting a waiver to the County's noise ordinance in order to operate a 1 ,200 kilowatt diesel generator on a continuous basis between the dates of August 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009 in order to climatize the Green Ridge Recreation Center on Woodhaven Road. The operation of the generator is necessary to provide climate control in order to ensure the quality of the application of the interior building finishes. Permanent power may be provided as early as August 21, 2009, possibly shortening the duration of the operation of the generator. The attached letter submitted by English Construction, one of the partner firms that comprise Firstchoice, documen~s the request for the noise ordinance waiver. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached resolution granting this waiver. 1i&-~~.~-4 615 Church Street, Lynchburg, Virginia 24504 P. O. Box P-7000, Lynchburg, Virginia 24505 Tel: (434) 845-0301 Fax: (434) 845-0306 July 6, 2009 Mr. Dan O'Donnell County of Roanoke, Va PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Va 24018-0798 Re: Green Ridge Recreation Center Noise Ordinance Waiver #2 Dear Dan: This request is for a noise ordinance waiver to utilize the use of a temporary generator (1200 kw Cat Diesel) to install and temporarily operate the following equipment until the permanent power for the center has been installed by AEP; the elevator, HVAC equipment, light fixtures and additional equipment required by subcontractors to complete their work. Time Frame: Start August 1st end September 30th. 24 hours per day. Purpose: To climatize the interior of the building for the installation of finishes. Location of Generator: West side of Gymnasium. AEP will start offsite construction of the permanent power on July 13th, originating from the intersection of Concourse Drive and Valleypointe Parkway, and be complete in 2 to 3 weeks. They expect to energize the building approximately 1 to 2 weeks after the completion of the underground work, weather permitting. The earliest would be August 21 st to turn permanent power on. If you need any further information please feel free to contact me at 540-265-5675. David Radford English Construction Company Project Manager ~ 1~O~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER UNDER SECTION 13-23 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY'S NOISE ORDINANCE, ARTICLE II. NOISE OF CHAPTER 13. OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TO FIRSTCHOICE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERS, LLC WHEREAS, Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC, the contractor for the Roanoke County Multigenerational Recreation Center, for the purposes of climatizing the interior of the structure in order to apply building finishes, has requested a waiver of the County's noise ordinance as contemplated under Section 13-23. Undue hardship waiver to permit the running of a large generator beginning on August 1,2009 and ending on September 30, 2009; and WHEREAS, Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code establishes certain standards for the Board of Supervisors to grant waivers from the provision of the Roanoke County Noise Ordinance Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous to avoid undue hardship upon consideration of certain factors set forth in subsection (b) of Section 13-23 and after making certain alternative findings. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. In making its determination as to whether to grant the requested waiver to the Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC from the County's noise ordinance, the Board of Supervisors has considered the following factors: a. The time of day the noise will occur and the duration of the noise: Beginning at approximately 5:00 p.m. on August 1, 2009, and ending 12:00 p.m. on September 30,2009; the noise will occur and last 24 hours a day. Although permanent power may be at the building as soon as August 21 allowing for the generator to be discontinued, the date of September 30 is the date requested in case of possible delays. b. Whether the noise is intermittent or continuous: The noise produced by the generator at the Multi-Generational Recreation Center, located at the intersection of Woodhaven Road and Valleypointe Parkway, will be continuous. c. The extensiveness of the noise: The generator will be located to the rear of the building, between the structure and Route 581. The sound will not be audible at any residence except for the possibility of one house located across the street from the construction entrance on Woodhaven Road. The noise level at the one house will be minimal. d. The technical and economic feasibility of bringing the noise into conformance with the noise ordinance: The generator has to be operated for 24 hours per day, 7 days per week in order to climatize the building to ensure finishes are properly applied until permanent power can be delivered, therefore it is not technically feasible to conform with the noise ordinance unless completion of the project is delayed several weeks. e. Other matters related to the impact of the noise on the health, safety and welfare of the community and the degree of hardship resulting from enforcement of the ordinance: none. f. The extent to which the noise is necessary and incidental to the commercial Page 2 of 4 and industrial use generating the sound: The operation of the generator is necessary for the completion of the Multi-Generational Recreation Center unless significant delays are accepted by the County. Not granting the waiver would result in the contractor being unable to complete the project in accordance with the project schedule, thereby suffering substantial penalties for non-compliance with the Comprehensive Agreement. Furthermore, denying the waiver request would cause the facility opening to be delayed to the detriment of the community. 2. The Board of Supervisors makes the following finding: Compliance with the provisions of the County's noise ordinance concerning the specific act of noise disturbance by construction machinery or operations under subsection (1) of Section 13-21. Specific acts as noise disturbance or under the provision of Section 13-20. General prohibition would produce serious economic hardship for Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC, without producing any substantial benefit to the public. 3. That the provisions of Section13-21. Specific acts as noise, subsection (1) and Section 13-20. General prohibition of Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous be WAIVED for a period from August 1, 2009 until September 30, 2009. 4. This Waiver is granted specifically to Firstchoice Public Private Partners, LLC, its officers, employees and agents for the operation of a generator at the Multi- Generational Recreation Center construction site in Roanoke County, Virginia for work performed between August 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009. 5. That this Waiver may only be extended upon written application and approval by the Page 3 of 4 Board of Supervisors. 6. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from its passage. Page 4 of 4 AC1"ION NO. ITEM NO. f -, AT A REGULAR MEE1-ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA1-ION CENTER MEETING DA-rE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of an ordinance authorizing the vacation of portions of right-of-way of Brentwood Court on plat of Section No. 3 of Kingston Court, in Plat Book 11, page 39, of the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office, and retaining public utility easements, said right-of-way located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director, Cornmunity Development APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III ~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Jeff Todd and Mr. Stephen Stillwell, the developers of The Manor at Kingston Court, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, request that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to abandon 1 ,326 square feet of existing Right-Of-Way and convert it to a public utility easenlent as shown on Exhibit A. This 1 ,326 square feet section of property will be added to the property of Lot 1 which is owned by C. Allen Wilkerson and Debra L. Wilkerson D.B. 1609, P.G 867. Also the developers request that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to abandon 3,385.95 square feet of existing Right-of-Way and retain a 15 foot public utility easement within said Right-of-Way as shown on Exhibit B. This 3,385.95 square feet section will be added to the property of Lot 16 which is owned by Michael S. and Cheryl Kirkbride D.B 1703 P.G. 1360. In a previous action by the Board, the County of Roanoke approved a request to accept 0.08 miles of Brentwood Court (VA Sec. Rte. 1983) to the end of its cul-de-sac and abandonment of this existing right-of-way. Staff from the County of Roanoke reviewed the request and recommends an approval. Second reading and public hearing will be scheduled for July 28, 2009. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Board approval. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BRENTWOOD COURT ON PLAT OF SECTION NO.3 OF KINGSTON COURT, IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 39, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE, AND RETAINING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by Resolution 10990-4.c of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, a street designated as Brentwood Court extending from Chippenham Drive to a turnaround or cul-de-sac, has been accepted into the State Secondary Road System, as shown on the plat of Section NO.3 of Kingston Court subdivision, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, Plat Book 11, page 39; and WHEREAS, by subsequent action of the Board of Supervisors on September 9, 2008 and January 27, 2009, the street designated as Brentwood Court, Virginia Secondary Route 1983, after the abandonment of the initial length of Brentwood Court, was extended from its original point of beginning to the end of a new permanent cul-de- sac in this subdivision, as shown on the plat of The Manor of Kingston Court, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 27, page 156; and WHEREAS, the extension of Brentwood Court has resulted in the abandonment of portions of the initial cul-de-sac which served as the initial terminus of that street and the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner has expressed his approval of the vacation or "quit" of those portions of the original cul-de-sac of Brentwood Court which no longer serve public convenience so as to warrant their maintenance at public expense; and WHEREAS, the developers of The Manor at Kingston Court, Jeff Todd and Stephen Stillwell, and the property owners of Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 16, Block 2, of Kingston Court, Section 3, which adjoin the original cul-de-sac of Brentwood Court, have requested, pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the vacation of 1 ,326 square feet and 3,386 square feet, respectively, so as to add and combine these areas to their existing properties; and Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the portion of the above described street or road to be vacated is more clearly indicated as "PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE CONVERTED TO A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND COMBINED WITH LOT 1 BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA", attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE COMBINED WITH LOT 16 AND RETAIN A 15' PUE BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA", attached hereto as Exhibit "B", both dated 7-14-2009, prepared by Roanoke County Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, no other property owner will be affected by the vacation of this abandoned portion of said Brentwood Court and that its current existence imposes an impediment to the adjoining property owners making improvements to their properties adjoining this previously dedicated street; and WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 2009, and a second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on July 28, 2009. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the subject real estate (a portion of Brentwood Court, Route 1983, previously dedicated to public use, Plat Book 11, page 39) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate renders it unavailable for other public use. 3. That so much of this street, Brentwood Court, Route 1983, being designated and shown as "PORTION OF ROAD TO BE COMBINED W/LOT 1" on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, said portion of street being located adjacent to Lot 1, Block 3, Section No. 3 of Kingston Court (PB11, page 39), and "PORTION OF ROAD TO BE Page 2 of 3 COMBINED W/LOT 16" on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, said portion of street being located adjacent to Lot 16 , Block 2, Section NO.3 of Kingston Court (PB11, page 39), in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. That a public utility easement is accepted, reserved and maintained for public purposes in the areas previously designated as "Brentwood Court" as shown on Exhibit "A" and Exhi bit "B", attached hereto. 5. That the portion of the vacated street contained within the bounds designated as 1-2-3 of Exhibit "A", containing 1 ,325.70 square feet, shall be added and combined with Lot 1, Block 3, Section No.3, Kingston Court, Tax Map # 086.08-07-09.02, currently the property of C. Allen & Debra L. Wilkerson. 6. That the portion of the vacated street designated as "PORTION OF ROAD TO BE COMBINED W/LOT 16" of Exhibit "B", containing 3,385.95 square feet, shall be added and combined with Lot 16, Block 2, Section No.3, Kingston Court, Tax Map # 086.08-07-09.01, currently the property of Michael S. & Cheryl Kirkbride. 7. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners. 8. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Page 3 of 3 THIS PLA T DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY AND ONL Y MA Y BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIVIDING PROPERTY AFTER A PAPER STREET IS VACA TED BY ROANOKE COUNTY FOR TAX PURPOSES_ A RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLA T WAS USED TO DETERMINE EXISTING ACREAGE AND ACREAGE TO BE ADDED TO THE PROPOSED PEnnONERS PROPERT~ "'U OJ /'<1 ~~ ~ .~ ~lb ~llv ~. LOT 5 ./I '" 17 4525 Ii'; ZZ) N '-J "'U G) ........ U'1 O'a TAX # 86.08-07-09.02 C. ALLEN & DEBRA L. WILKERSON 0.245 Ac. LOT 1 /'<1 ~~ ~ -~ ~ ~llv ~. ~ " LOT 6 ;/ 4519 I I~ I ~. Q.: I .. Ct) I "- I { .# 4520 \ \ \ I LOT 1 ~~~ , ,,~ , _txfo fo~ J\..~ ~. c,J "be 587-19 '55"E 194.39' ,,~ 'Obc -01 ~ ./I ~~\ \fi:P'} 17 4537 4'6'<>_ 3'7# 7 c:9 ..> 1tc:9 ## .6'.9# ~ ~~ ~~ R,~ ~CV Or 0'~ ;/ 4531 LOT 4 ;/ 4530 >>~ ~~ ~~ .~~ ~ O~ LOT 3 ..lu C.. .!l)~ ~<::) N~ ~O) c::::s ~ P.B. 27 PG. 156 LOT 2 LINE TABLE ~~ ~~ R, cb" .CV ~. $~ LEGEND LINE 1-2 2-3 3-1 BEARING S32006'35"W S78048'59liE N10000'39liE DISTANCE 86.86 ' 32.68 81.15' PORTION OF ROAD TO I_I BE COMBINED WI LOT 1 ~ 1,325.70 S.F. TAX MAP NO. 86.08 SCALE: 1 "= 1 00 ' EXHIBIT HAH PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE CONVERTED TO A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) AND COMBINED WITH LOT 1 BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: 7-14-2009 THIS PLA T DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEY AND ONL Y MA Y BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIVIDING PROPERTY AFTER A PAPER STREET IS VACA TED BY ROANOKE COUNTY FOR TAX PURPOSES" A RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLA T WAS USED TO DETERMINE EXISTING ACREAGE AND ACREAGE TO BE ADDED TO THE PROPOSED PETITIONERS PROPERTY" "'U OJ LINE 1-2 2-3 BEARING N32006'35"E N32006'21 "E DISTANCE 30.86' 20.51 ' Ii'; ZZ) N '-J "'U G) LINE TABLE ........ U'1 O'a l'<l \~ \ "~ ~ ~C't.t ~. LOT 6 ~ " ;/ 4519 l'<l \~ \ .~ ~lb ~C't.t ~. LOT 5 ;/ '" 4525 TAX # 86.08-07-09.01 MICHAEL S. & CHERYL KIRKBRIDE \\~ 0.398 Ac. \,~ \ LOT 16 "~ ~ c,~~ ,~ro. P.B. 11 PG. 39 587"19 '55"E 194.39' LOT 1 ,,~ 'Obc "01 ~ ;/ ~~\ \fi:P'} 4537 4'6'<>" 3'7# 7 c:9 ..> 1tc:9 ## .6'.9# ~ ~~ ~\ R,~ ~CV Or 0'~ ;/ 4531 LOT 4 ;/ 4530 >>~ ~~ ~~ .~~ ~ O~ LOT 3 ..lu C, .!l)~ ~<::) N~ ~O) c::::s ~ P.B. 27 PG. 156 LOT 2 CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH A 285.00' 77.82' B 25.00' 36.85' C 271.35' 99.08' D 50.00' 121.80' E 25.00' 30.78' CURVE DATA DEL TA TANGENT CHORD BEARING CHORD DISTANCE 15"38'42" 39.15' 571 "15'57"E 77.58' 84"26'36" 22.69' 574"19'59"W 33.60' 20"55'15" 50.10' 521 "38'45"W 98.53' 139"34'05" 135.78' N31"21'50"E 93.84' 70"32'09" 17.68' 503"09'17"E 28.87' ~~ ~\ R, cbV .CV ~. $~ LEGEND _. ~. ~.1 PORTION OF ROAD TO ~~~ BE COMBINED WI LOT 16 3,385.95 S.F. TAX MAP NO. 86.08 SCALE: 1 "= 1 00 ' EXHIBIT "B" PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE COMBINED WITH LOT 16 AND RETAIN A 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: 7-14-2009 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. r /- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions, and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III KJlr County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Capital Improvement Program Review Committee (appointed by District) -rile following appointments will expire 8/31/2009: a. Mike Jeffrey - Cave Spring Magisterial District b. Brian Hooker - Catawba Magisterial District c. Steven A. Campbell - Hollins M~gisterial District d. Wes -rhompson - Windsor Hills Magisterial District e. Charles S. Wertalik - Vinton Magisterial District 2. Clean Valley Council (At-Large) The two-year term of Dennis "Chip" Harris will expire on June 30, 2009. As requested by Chairman Altizer at the May 12, 2009 meeting, Mr. Harris was contacted to determine his willingness to serve additional terms. Mr. Harris has declined re-appointment. 3. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Board (appointed by District) The three-year term of Deborah George, Hollins Magisterial District. will expire on June 30, 2009. The Board has been notified that Ms. George is moving from the district. 4. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District) The four-year term of Natalie Norris, Cave Spring Magisterial District, will expire on July 31, 2009. & AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS-rRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLu-rION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FOR-rH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM G - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 14, 2009 designated as Item G - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3 inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution accepting Tolman Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System 2. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), administered through the Virginia Department of Emergency Management, to the Department of Fire and Rescue to support the Regional Technical Rescue Team 3. Request to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $143,832 for the Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. &-1 AT A REGULAR MEE-rING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT -rHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN-rER MEETING DA-rE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution accepting Tolman Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director, Community Development APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III 8t.($- County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: F & W Community Development Corporation, the developer of Samuel's Gate, Section 16, at "the Orchards," in the Hollins Magisterial District, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.07 mile of Tolman Circle from the intersection of Crumpacker Drive to its cul-de- sac, 0.16 mile of Crumpacker Drive from 0.01 mile east of Apple Harvest Drive (Virginia Secondary Route 1271) to the intersection with Tolman Circle, and 0.15 mile of Crumpacker Drive from the intersection of Tolman Circle to 0.01 mile west of Apple Harvest Drive (Virginia Secondary Route 1271). -rhe staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Tolman Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Secondary Road System. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TOLMAN CIRCLE AND A PORTION OF CRUMPACKER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached VDOT Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to ~33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. In the County' of Roanoke By resolution of the governing body adopted July 14, 2009 The following VDOT Form AM-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing bodY'8 resolution for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Official): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Project/Subdivision Samual's Gate Section 16 At The Orchards Tvpe Chane:e to the Secondary System of State Hif!hwavs: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: ~33.1-229 Street Name and/or Route Number '... Crumpacker Drive, State Route Number 781 Old Route Number: 0 · From: .01 mile east Rt 1271 To: new route 1304 Tolman Circle, a distance of: 0.16 miles. Right of Way width (feet) = 50 feet ~ Tolman Circle, State Route Number 1304 Old Route Number: 0 From: Crumpacker Drive To: Cul-De-Sac End, a distance of: 0.07 ll1iles. Right of Way width (feet) = 40 feet ..... Crumpacker Drive, State Route Number 781 Old Route Number: 0 From: new route 1304 Tolman Circle To: .01 mile west route 1271, a distance of: 0.15 miles. Right of Way width (feet) = 50 feet VDOT Form AM-4.3 ( 4/20/2007), Asset Management Division Pagelofl CORn.ANO ~EAOOW? ~C11ON IJ \ SrrE < . CORWD ME:ADQ~ '"' SEcn~{p '~OR~\PARK .' S!C1JON "P . '. HUNTRIlXiE. ~\ . RqAQ . ,,~~ 'S ~O., ~~~Df/ J9 ~ l~ _ V~CINITY MAP NORTH -"--f I I- I I. I Match line, See Sheet 2 DESCRIPTION LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY ROADWAY WIDTH SERVICE \ M Hes Feet Feet Houses Tolman Circle - from the intersection of 0.07 40 24 6 Crumpacker Drive to its cul-de-sac Crumpacker Drive.- 0.01 mile east of Apple 0.16 Harvest Drive (Va. Sec. Rte 1271) to 50 32 16 Tolman Circle. Crumpacker Drive.- from Tolman Circle 0.15 to a distance of 0.01 miles west of Apple 50 32 8 Harvest Drive (Va.Sec. Rte 1271) Sheet 1 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMVNITY DEVELOPMENT Samuel's Gate at the Orchards, Section No. 16 Acceptance of Tolm,an Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. \ CORTLANO ~EAOOKS McnON IJ \ . . COR!vIo uooow SE.cnCN"12 . ~OR~\ PARK . stCTlON ~ . . '. ffl/N1Rfor;E. ~\ . RqAD . ~ 6~O . ~~~~/9 ~ \~ . _ V~CINITY MAP NORTH Match line, See Sheet 1 ' LOT " " , , .~ , , ~ . . ~ . , LOT 11 . , / LOT U. DESCRIPTION LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY ROADWAY WIDTH SERVICE Miles Feet Feet Houses I Tolman Circle - from the intersection of 0.07 40 24 6 .Crumpacker Drive to its cul-de-sac Crumpacker Drive.- 0.01 mile east of Apple 0.16 Harvest Drive (Va. Sec. Rte 1271) to 50 32 16 Tolman Circle. Crumpacker Drive.- from Tolman Circle 0.15 to a distance of 0.01 miles west of Apple 50 32 8 Harvest Drive (Va.Sec. Rte 1271) Sheet 2. ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMM1JNITY DEVELOPMENT _ r ~ ~ Samuel's Gate at the Orchards, Section No. 16 Acceptance of Tolman Circle and a portion of Crumpacker Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF -rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA-rION CENTER MEE1-ING DA-rE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), adrrlinistered through the Virginia Department of Emergency Management, to the Department of Fire and Rescue to support the Regional Technical Rescue Team SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch Fire and Rescue Chief APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, 1I1~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Fire and Rescue, Roanoke City Fire-EMS, and the City of Salem Fire- EMS Departments participate in the State of Virginia's Heavy and Tactical Rescue Program as the Division-6 Technical Rescue Team (TRT). The Division-6 TRT is responsible for providing emergency response to most of Southwest Virginia and has been placed on alert for State and National emergencies. The funding is for the purchase of equipment and/or training expenses to support the activities of the Regional Technical Rescue Team. FISCAL IMPACT: ""rhis grant does not require a monetary match; however, does require staff time to coordinate with Roanoke City and the City of Salem to expend the funds. If the grant is not accepted, the program will not be able to purchase needed equipment to support the team. Page 1 of 2 AL TERNA1-IVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution and authorization of a certified copy to accorTlpany the application for the grant award. Staff also recommends the acceptance and appropriation of $100,000 in grant funds from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management to the Fire and Rescue Department. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION, ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), ADMINISTERED THROUGH THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND RESCUE TO SUPPORT THE REGIONAL TECHNICAL RESCUE TEAM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that B. Clayton Goodman, III, County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of Roanoke County, a public entity established under the laws of the State of Virginia, this application and to file it in the appropriate State Office for the purpose of obtaining certain Federal financial assistance under the National Preparedness Directorate, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), administered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. That, Roanoke County, a public entity established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereby authorizes it agent to provide to the Commonwealth and to the DHS for all matters pertaining to such Federal financial assistance any and all information pertaining to these Grants as may be requested. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County authorizes the acceptance of said grant monies in the amount of $100,000 and authorizes the appropriation of said monies for the purposes authorized in the grant application. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. (;--3 AT A REGULAR MEE-rING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEE1-ING DA-rE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $143,832 forthe Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) SUBMITTED BY: James R. Lavinder Chief of Police B. Clay Goodman, III ~ County Administrator APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SllMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Police Department made application to the Department of Justice- Office of Justice Programs for funding under the Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Local Solicitation in the amount of $143,832 for the purpose of providing replacement Mobile Data Terminals over a three-year period. There are no matching funds required to receive this grant. The Police Department estimated in the application to spend an aggregate of $6,219 from its yearly budget during the grant period, which runs from March 1 J 2009 through February 28, 2013. FISCAL IMPACT: None AL TERNA-rIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of funds in the amount of $143,832 for the Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). K-l GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIA-rED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount 0/0 of General Fund Revenue Unaudited balance at June 30, 2009 $ 17,493,808 9.650/0 * Balance at July 14, 2009 $ 17,493,808 9.370/0 ** Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance increnlentally over several years. * 2008-09 a range of 9.00/0-10.0010 of General Fund Revenues 2008-2009 General Fund Revenues $181,259,899 9.00/0 of General Fund Revenues $16,313,391 10.0010 of General Fund Revenues $18,125,990 ** 2009-10 a range of 9.50/0-10.50/0 of General Fund Revenues 2009-10 General Fund Revenues $186,756,550 9.50/0 of General Fund Revenues $17,741,872 10.5010 of General Fund Revenues $19,609,438 The unaudited Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County at June 30, 2009 was maintained at 9.650/0 which was within the range of our goal for 2008-09. The balance will be increased over time to the following ranges: 2010-2011 10.00/0-11.0% Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III &J) County Administrator k-~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Unaudited balance at June 30, 2009 Amount $1,932,871.20 Balance at July 14, 2009 $1,932,871.20 Maior County Capital Reserve (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Unaudited balance at June 30, 2009 $2,339,030.00 Balance at July 14, 2009 $2,339,030.00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III U.rn County Administrator ~ RESERVE FOR BOARD CON-rINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA From 2009-2010 Original Budget May 26, 2009 Appropriation of funds for the lease of property for the temporary location of the Mt. Pleasant Library June 9, 2009 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison Balance at July 14,2009 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman 11IBu;y County Administrator K-3 Amount $100,000.00 (15,600.00) (24,000.00) $ 60,400.00 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N-{ AT A REGULAR MEE-rING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DA-rE: July 14, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Work session on restricting through truck traffic on Route 116 (Jae Valley Road) SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III ~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 46.2-809 of the Code of Virginia through trucks can be restricted on certain primary and secondary routes in the limited number of cases where doing so will promote the health, safety and welfare of the public without creating an undue hardship on any transportation users. Such restriction may apply to any truck or truck and trailer or semitrailer combination, except a pickup or panel truck that has no point of origin or destination along the subject route. During the work session, representatives from the Virginia Department of Transportation and County staff will review with the Board the criteria and the process to restrict through truck traffic on primary and secondary roads. Adopted by Commonwealth Transportation Board October 16, 2003 GUIDELINES FOR CONSIDERING REQUESTS TO RESTRICT THROUGH TRUCKS ON PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HIGHWAYS Section 46.2- 809 of the Code of Virginia provides: The Commonwealth Transportation Board, or its designee, in response to a formal request by a local governing body, after such body has held public hearings, may, after due notice and a proper hearing, prohibit or restrict the use by through traffic of any part of a primary or secondary highway if a reasonable alternate route is provided. The Board, or its designee, shall act upon any such formal request within nine months of its receipt, unless good cause is shown. Such restriction may apply to any truck or truck and trailer or semitrailer combination, except a pickup or panel truck:, as may be necessary to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Commonwealth. Nothing in this section shall affect the validity of any city charter provision or city ordinance heretofore adopted. Background It is the philosophy of the Commonwealth Transportation Board that all vehicles should have access to the roads on which they are legally entitled to travel. Travel by any class ofvehicle on any class of highway should be restricted only upon demonstration that it will promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Commonwealth without creating an undue hardship on any of the users of the transportation system. The Board recognizes that there may be a limited number of instances when restricting through trucks from using a segment of a primary or secondary roadway will reduce potential conflicts, creating a safer environment and one that is in accord with the current use of the roadway. The Board has adopted these guidelines to govern and regulate requests for through truck restrictions on primary and secondary highways. Process The Commonwealth Transportation Board delegates the authority to restrict through truck traffic on secondary highways to the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Such 1 restrictions can apply to any truck, truck and trailer or semi trailer combination, or any combination of those classifications. Consideration of all such restrictions by the Commissioner is subject to these guidelines as adopted by the Board. The Commonwealth Transportation Board retains the authority to restrict through truck traffic on primary highways. In order to conform to the requirements of the Code of Virginia and to insure that all concerned parties have an opportunity to provide input, the local governing body must hold a public hearing and mak:e a formal request of the Department. The following must be adhered to: (A) The public notices for the hearing must include a description of the proposed through truck restriction and the alternate route with the same termini. A copy of the notices must be provided. (B) A public hearing must be held by the local governing body and a transcript of the hearing must be provided with the resolution. (C) The reso lution must describe the propo sed through truck restriction and a description of the alternate, including termini. (D) The governing body must include in the resolution that it will use its good offices for enforcement of the proposed restriction by the appropriate local law enforcement agency. Failure to comply with (A), (B), (C) and (D) will result in the request being returned. The Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Commissioner shall act upon any such formal request within nine months of its receipt, unless good cause is shown. Criteria Travel by any class of vehicle should be restricted only upon demonstration that it will promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Commonwealth without creating an undue hardship on any users of the transportation network. The Virginia Department of Transportation will consider criteria 1 through 4 in reviewing a requested through truck restriction. The proposed restriction must meet both the frrst and second criteria in order to be approved: 1. Reasonable alternate routing is provided. The alternate route will be evaluated for traffic and 2 safety related impacts. To be considered "reasonable", the alternate route(s) must be engineered to a standard sufficient for truck travel, and must be judged at least as appropriate for truck traffic as the requested truck restriction route. If an alternate route must be upgraded, the improvement shall be completed before the truck restriction can be implemented. The termini of the proposed restriction must be identical to the alternate routing to allow a time and distance comparison to be conducted between the two routings. Also, the alternate routing must not create an undue hardship for trucks in reaching their destination. 2. The character and/or frequency of the truck traffic on the route proposed for restriction is not compatible with the affected area. Evaluation will include safety issues, accident history, engineering of the roadway, vehicle composition, and other traffic engineering related issues. In addition to meeting the frrst two criteria, the proposed restriction must meet either the third or the fourth criteria in order to be approved. 3. The roadway is residential in nature. Typically, the roadway will be judged to be residential if there are at least 12 dwellings combined on both sides within 150' of the existing or proposed roadway center line per 1,000 feet of roadway. 4. The roadway must be functionally classified as either a local or collector. Failure to satisfy criteria 1 and 2, and either criteria 3 or 4 will normally result in rejection of the requested restriction. The Commonwealth Transportation Board when deemed necessary may modify or revise any provisions or criteria contained in these guidelines. 3 Virginia Department of Transportation July 15, 2004 PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERING REQUESTS FOR RESTRICTING THROUGH TRUCKS ON PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HIGHWAYS The following actions constitute a complete and thorough procedure for considering requests to restrict through traffic on primary or secondary roads in accordance with Section 46.2-809 of the Code of Virginia: 1. Before submitting a through truck restriction to VDOT, the local governing body must hold a legally advertised public hearing with adherence to the following: A. Public notices for the hearing must contain a description of the route(s) of the proposed through truck restriction and the alternate route(s) with the same termini. A copy of all Public Notices must be provided with the request. B. The governing body must hold a public hearing and a transcript of that hearing must be provided with the request. C. A copy of the adopted resolution describing the proposed through truck restriction and the alternate including termini must be provided with the request. D. The local governing body must include in the resolution that it will use its good offices for enforcement of the proposed restriction by the appropriate local law enforcement agency. A failure on the part of the local governing body to comply with A, B, C and D will result in the return of the request to the locality for compliance. 2. The local governing body must make its formal request through the Resident Engineer, certifying that it has met all the requirements noted in item #1. The Resident Engineer, upon acceptance of the truck restriction request, will forward it to the District Administrator. The District Administrator will forward the request to the State Traffic Engineer. 3. The State Traffic Engineer will secure and evaluate the following data: A. The functional classification for the route(s) proposed for restriction and the route(s) proposed as alternate. B. Review of the Six- Year Improvement Program to determine any improvements scheduled for the proposed restricted route(s) and the proposed alternate route(s). C. A traffic engineering study to include: (1) Traffic volumes by vehicle type including the number and percentage of trucks on the route(s) proposed for restriction, and the date(s) the data is collected. (2) Comparison of driving runs on the route(s) proposed for restriction and the alternate route(s), to indicate travel time/distance penalties or savIngs. 1 Virginia Department of Transportation July 15, 2004 D. An inventory of roadway characteristics and geometrics for the route(s) proposed for restriction and the alternate route(s). This inventory should include: (1) Roadway length in miles (2) Pavement width (3) Number of travel lanes (4) Shoulder width (5) Pavement type and condition (6) Speed limit (7) Number and Type of adjacent land uses (i.e., residential and/or commercial) (8) Vertical and horizontal alignment (9) Parking restrictions and/or parking observed 4. The State Traffic Engineer will secure and evaluate all available accident data or the data for the previous three (3) years for the route(s) proposed for restriction and the alternate route(s). 5. Following receipt of all requested data and information, the State Traffic Engineer will conduct a traffic engineering study of the restriction request and a report will be prepared. This report will be sent to the District Administrator for one or more of the following actions: A. Publish a public notice of the proposed restriction, requesting written comment only B. Publish a public notice of the proposed restriction and advise of the Department's willingness to hold a public hearing if requested C. Publish a public notice of the time and place of a public hearing on the proposed restriction If a public hearing is required, the District Administrator or his representative will hold the hearing in accordance with established procedures. In conjunction with the publishing of the public notice, signs will be erected at the terminus of the proposed restricted route(s) advising of the proposed restriction and listing contact information for receiving public comments. This signing shall be erected for a period of at least thirty (30) days. A copy of the public notice will be sent to the Virginia Trucking Association for distribution to the trucking industry and other interested parties. If a proposed alternate route(s) includes route(s) in another locality, the locality should be notified of this proposal for their comments. 6. The District Administrator will prepare a report that will include his recommendation and all pertinent materials (i.e., transcript of public hearing if held, copy of published public notice and any written or oral comments received). This report will be sent to the State Traffic Engineer. 2 Virginia Department of Transportation July 15, 2004 7. The District Administrator will inform the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) member representing the area containing the proposed restricted route(s) of the restriction request and obtain the CTB member's opinion. The District Administrator will provide the State Traffic Engineer with the board member's concurrence or disagreement with the recommendation. 8. The State Traffic Engineer will review all data and material including the District Administrator's recommendation. A report will be prepared which will consider the criteria outlined in the CTB approved "Guidelines for Considering Requests to Restrict Through Trucks on Primary and Secondary Highways". This report and a recommendation to approve or deny the proposed restriction will be submitted to the Chief of System Operations. 9. For restrictions on secondary routes, the recommendation of the State Traffic Engineer, if approved by the Chief of System Operations will be presented to the Commissioner for approval or denial of the proposed restriction. 10. For restrictions on primary routes, the recommendation of the State Traffic Engineer, if approved by the Chief of System Operations will be presented to the Commissioner for consideration by the Commonwealth Transportation Board for their approval or denial of the proposed restriction. 11. Following Commissioner or Board action the State Traffic Engineer will make all appropriate notifications. The residency will be requested to post appropriate signs if the restriction is approved 12. If a request is received to rescind or modify an existing "through truck" restriction these same procedures must be followed. 3 Process to Restrict Through Trucks on Primary and Secondary Highways Local Governing Body (LGB) holds I Local Hearing I legally advertised public hearing. ~ Public notices of hearing must describe route and alternate. Copies of public notices Copy of adopted resolution with description of proposed TTR & suitable alternate must accompany request. Hearing transcript Copy of adopted resolution Adopted resolution must state that LGB will use its good offices for enforcement of TTR by appropriate local law enforcement Statement of local enforcement Docu mentation ~ Incomplete documentation-request rejected ...... """"lIII Documentation &. request sent to VDOT Resident Engineer. + Time from request to DA to action by Commissioner cannot exceed 9 months. Forwarded to VDOT District Administrator CDA) for review. ~ Sent to State Traffic Engineer (STE) office for study &. evaluation. ~ DA requests public comments, advises CTB representative and returns with recommendation to STE. I . STE reviews all materials &. prepares report. Submits to Chief of System Operations (CSO) with recommendation. + + For primary routes, CSO sends recommendation to CTB. For secondary routes, CSO recommends action to Commissioner. ~ ~ CTB approves or denies restriction. Commissioner approves or denies restriction. I I t STE notifies District. + District notifies LGB &. posts signs if appropriate. 4 ~ ~ \0 t- ::ft:N ......0 == 0 ~9 "Cln .~ 0 ClO ;...l N ~ ~ 0\ 0\ ~ o o o ..A o o N .~ 0 ~It- ~ t- ~" ~ ~ ~~" o '"0 O..:t: :;s ~ ] ~ ~ ~ *" ~ g ~ 'S ~ ~~~~~~: ~~~r/3 ..5 d0!::g~~8:ti~;g~ ~ ;:: t- ~ N.~ : 8 0 C"'l e a.>:2 [)~~~: ~~"8~ ~ ,9....--4 ~ ~ ....--4 ~o * S ~o ~ ~ a.> "-'""1 ~ In * \.'4 \0 C"'l OJ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .S ] ~ ~ 0 ....--4 ~ ~ 0 cd .- 0 ::;B C/) \0 0 ~ In ~ ~C"'la.>~8 08oif8 i..." '"O~~Q~"SO .,,~ ON o ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 0 ::;3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~<.) a.>~C/)~0 ~ ~\O ~ ~ooQ~bD::r./1....--4308 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ . ~ :; ~ 0 1:: en" '" CIJ ...... <;l il 00 r:: '" ~ Z 8. ~ ~ < ~ ;; rT1 .~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ a.>...c: .....<:1:; ~~ ~ ~ C/) ....--4 ~ ;> u a.> ~ ~ r ~ ~~....--4~~~~~~ 1:: ~ 8~~o~~ ::c...c:~] ~ t::SO~8~;:6~~~0 ~o80~~t- bJ)\O;::$~ ~ 0 <i:l ~ '9 8 2 ~ .8 r-- ::r:: a J:i' f-<g8o......f-<~~~~Z o ~~ ~:;~ S':?~ ~ ~ ~ d ~~ 8]~;::$ 1i)c:'! 0 0 ~ H ~ a.> ~ ~ ~~" g ~ ~..8 0 .~ ~ c ~ ] .- f-) ~ ~ cd ~ r./1 ~~ w 0 . cd a.> .....J .. ....--4 ~ ..a 0 ~ ~::c8t)~o~ln~C/3~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Q 'a s 00 0 ~ ~ s ~ ~~8~88~8~~tE S 0 ~ ....--4 ::t: .. .S ....--4 ~ ::c "S ~ r./1 ~ ~ .~ 8 ~ :g ~ 8 ~ 0 ~ ~ '.g ~ ~ ....--4 0 0 ." i3 '"0 ~ ~ z ~ N : ~ ~ 8 ~ .s .8 ~ S > 0""" ...-l '"0 ~ \0 C/) ~ ~ "d v ~~0....--4p;::~~r./1 0 ~ 8 ;$ ..0 0 C"'l III a.> ~ ;> .. ~ 0 ~ ~~ ~8~~"~~gfC/) ~ _~ .8 t3 -a ~ ~ ~ p;:: r2 v--; .~ ~ "d:.a 0 r' ;> ~ ~ er a.> 0 ~- r./1 8 ~ ~ "d 'S ." \0 t= a.> '"0 ~ r' 1:: ,..0 s'"O~~ ~o cd~ bJ)....--4 C/) 0 ~ r~ $:j.>. a.> a.> ~ U ~ ~ In :; ~ .. I,n <:r:: 4-I-....c: u rn 00 00 .. 0 00 ~ C"'l bJ) P'""""4 '.0 ~ r./1 .~ d) ~" ~ ~ t- cd In ~ a.> Z 0 ~ ;$ a.> r-1C"'l 0 ."'~ :.s ~ 0 ~ ~ .~.t;j ~ ~ ~ :;s rn ~ ~ ~ ~ r./l ~N \0._ a.> ~d3]~~~ ~ ~ [v--;8s..o ....--4 -< ." .~ ~ .Jl"l ....--4 ~"r~ ~ ;::$ .~ ." ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ""..I '-'..l ~ .~ g ~ ~ ~ ] Q ~ ~ ~ g ~. ii :; E ~ ~ ~ u .~] u gf:; ~ t? 00" i3 - ~ ~ cd a.> ~ 8 :E :g ....--4 \0.- 's ~88~~8~>~~8~~r/3 ~~]~ ~] =~:E]~~ ~o>~~s '"0 ~ ~ ~ ~ - a.> :g::a <> d ~ ~ f-) - ('f') - \0 = 0\ u~ "d ~ ~ ~ -a > a.> cd f-) 00 ('f') N ~ ~ a E:=lIl "'00 Cl 0 ~~ ~ In ...... ....--4 ~-... ~g In o o N -... o ~ -... \0 o ....--4 t- oo ~ In o o o ..A o o C"'l ...-l t- ~"' ~ ....--4 6" .. ~ ~ ;;;; lIl~t-"0 .....JlJ~....--4 o ~ ~ cd':: ~ a.> ~ ::t: III o a.>....--4 "E \.'4 ." ~> ~ ~ 0 ~~::t: o~ ~ ~ O>~~ ~~~UO'"Oa.>~..oO~ p, ..9 :: ~ ~ .~ .EP ~ "0 0 ....--4 - ~ 0 r' ....--4 t= 'C gf ~ ~ ~ 0\ ] 0 ] III cd Z :.=: ~ ....--4 ." U~~S8~..~0~~ ~~~ "O~O;::$~~~ ."r./1 ~08Z~~o]~~~ ~]:tf~8O:~-~-<~ ~ ~ ~ 0"' 0 ~ ~ a.> C"'l C"'l ...9 cd ,";.a ~ In a S C/) ~ ~ u >=: cd '"0 0 i3 .& ~ S ~ er~~~_~~ ~."'~ \O$~ o~~ ~~r--, b~ ~OOt-~...c:~~ ....--4"O~~~ZO~~"O ~ ~""doo I--t ~""d~U ~ U a.> ....--4> ,,,Z"E ~ ~"'~ 8a~ ~" ~ S ~ 0 ::c '"0 ~ ~ .~ .;::: r-1 In'~ U ~ ~ -a bJ) Q Z .~ 'S: ~ ::t: 0 ..0 .- ;::$ 0 . . ~ ~ cd ~ ~ .~ ~ 0 ;.a ~ III ~ ~.. ~ :! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a.> ~ .. 00 ~ ~ r./) Q) ~r./1 ~ ~ III ~ ~ ~ .. s ;> a.> ::c ~ c:'!C"'l~0~....--4 0~~~....--4 0....--4 C"'lcdOr./)a.>-~ln ~..~~~AiE~~~8 ~~~~er~O..~ It)lIlg8~::!:"SN~~2} 08N"':';~lIl~~<Cr./1t- ON~C/)~O~\O 00 ~~[::Sa.>f1~::t:]Z~ ~0t-8~ ~~>~:S;>] O ~ ~........ 11"\ ~ "d U ~ ."' a.> .. ~ \JJ III 0 .Jl"l ~ ."' ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 0 Z ~ 0 ~": ~ '"0 cd ." ~ ~ ~ 7(\ ': ~t- era.> ~ ~o~ 0 go t=::o~~ ~Zoo~ o~Z ~ ~ ~ 'E ] ~ ~ 8 ~ ''''S o;;~o;;&jZ~~~~~~ ~ t r-1 0" :2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'B ~ .S ~ 8 ] ~ ~ ~ OJ} g ~ r./1 ~ ~ 0\ ~ .s s ~ ~ '"0 ~~~~c:'!]c/l~~Z~ ~ ~ ~ ::c ::!: ~ .. ~ .. ~ ~ : ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'E ~ c:'! ~ .. ~ .S III .- 0 ...-l ~ \0 In .- :t)~~~~~'"O::t:::t:O ......... g ~ ~ ....--4 '"0 ""..I ~ ~ ~ ." ....--4f-)....--4~t-~....--4(lj....--4....--4~ ~~~ ~8::c~ ~~~ ~ ~ c:'! ~ ~ ~" :2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t- ~ bJ)C"'l 1:: ~ ~ ~ ~ "d ~c:'!t=::~a.>0t=::~t=::t=::~ 8~ 8Z ~ un8-< 88.. "E-a a.> ~ ] ~ ~ -<~S '"0 ~ ~ ~ ca > a.> (lj ~ 00 ~ C"'l ~ In o o N -... ~ .........-4 -... t- o ~ 0\ 00 o 00 o o o tA o o C"'l o t- ~ i..." & ~ g ~~" ~ a~ Uo.~ a.>~ a.>Z~ ~~ "d~~ '-'..l r' CI5 a.> N ~ .~ ""d [) 0 ~ r./1 ~ "d ....--4 cd '"0 Z cd ;> ..2: a.> 0 "d ~;B v"~-< ~ ~" ~~" f6 rn ('f') U H III a5N Q)U~ ~C"'l ..o\O~ ~O\ ~t-oo @o\ ~S~ b ~a.>~ o I lIlCO~ ~ Q) S ::;3 .~ k3~ rn~ ~ ~:.a ~t- ~ ~ ~ 8~~ ~8 ;o~ 8~ ~~~ U ._ (u" ~ ~ < .S ~ 0" t: o.....J .~ N" 0 0 *" :9 ~ t- '.g ~: ~ .. 0\ U 0 NO.:: ~ ~ ~.....J ~ * ~~t)~: ~~~~: 00 \JJ~ ~* O~~~* ~~O ~: o I--t a.> ~(\ ~ N 0 ~ \,AJ +-t 0\ 0 C/) ~ .9 ;; u 0 0 "0 ::::>< ~ U ~~" :.=: E ~ .- o-<t>~~ CJ ~" ~ ." '0 .,,~ clj ~ CO ~~ ~ ~ 8 8 [) 0 ~ ~~~~S ~~u I--t~ .. ~ ." a.> 0\ ~ 0 ;> III 0 0 0 ~ g '.g 0 lIlS'"3~ ~~]: lIl~~~ o ~ d) 'a ~-a~~ 8~6" ~~ ~~u~S "d Q) a.> ~] ._ a.> 0> '"0 ~ ~ ~ -a > a.> cd ~ ....--4 o 00 C"'l In o o C"'l -... 0\ ....--4 -... o ...-l \0 0\ ~ 00 C"'l o o o ...D o o C"'l ~ -.::t ...-l r- ~" ~ ~ cd ....c: r./1 0\ C"'l o ...-< ~u t-"d o-a ....--4 ~ ." 0 p;:: * * * ;..; * ~ ~~ ~~ r./) ~O\ o~ ~...-< '"O~ .S t- ~S a.> U S Cd ~ ~ M" ~ t" ~ ~ 0 U ;::$ ~ o~ ~ ;> .E S ou ~€~ ""d a.> cd '8 ~ ~ -<~o -... ~j ~~ ~~ -aca >> a.> ~ ~a \.0 o o N -... t- C"'l -... ~ o ~ 1..0 00 -::::t ::n:~ ...0 = 0 aJ 0 ~~ .u 0 = 0 ~0.J .......-l ~ .......-l -::::t If) o o o ~ o o 0.J .~ 0 ~It- ~ o ~ 6~ t- If) ~~r ~:f o~o .......-l ~.......-l o~ ~ .......-l s~~ ~8~ r-' If) on o t- ~ :.s 1..0 g ~ ~ ~ ~,~ CO ;:$ ~ t- 0.JUot- t-(/)oS ~].., rn ~ ~ .S "d ~~~S . ~ 0~ If) ~ ~t-Et ~o~(]) ~ ~.......-l rn"D ~ ~.......-lbDO o o:S~S~ ~ ..............-l 0 ~ rnO ~ rn ~ .t:: ~S ~gf~~ ~ ~ .S g 8 ~ 'E ~ % ~ .......-l ] >~ ~trnu 08~ M~].... ~~ ~a02 ~ _.~ 0 ~'8 (]) ~ .......-l~~t~ sg~ ~~~~ o ~ ~.......-l 0 .t:: ~~ g~~~ ~~~llS:€~ ]~cJ]~~~ & '-e "d U 1:: u ~ (/)~~o:S~]o N (]) ~ ....... 0 U CO ..cQ~~~~ ~lf) ~ elf) ~~ ~ t'D p .u...... ~ ~ u(\j ~ If) ~ ~;:::i ~ I ueu~"d~S .~ 8 ~~ c ~ :€ b~ (/)~8 ~~~ ~ ~O.......-l co (])~ (]) o rn .~..!:j U ~ rn ~"d ~ <r: e ~coo~o~s -~g.......-ld~(\j U"dP OO~ aJ I (]) 0~ ~ ~ co 0\ .~ c.S ~ t- .t:: 7 If) 8 ...~u~Oot-.......-l e.......-l(n~.......-l~.......-l~~ ;~ Elf) 0.J It- z~~~~~~~ ~ co "d (]) ~ u o ~ rn ~"d 'C 0 (]) 0 >~ ~ ~ ca > (]) (\j I--) ~ "dO ~ (]) ~~ 'C ~ (]) 0 > ~ <t:: ~ o ~'S€~ ~ ~ (]) (\j -- '(j ~ s ~ c; u P (\j ..9 u<t::P:Q~ l'I.l l'I.l aJ ............. ~"d"'d ~~~ -< ~ (]) = ~ ~ aJ , ~ ~ ........ 0 .. (]) ~ =' (\j (]) u~<t:: ............. "'d"'d ~~ ~ (]) (]) rn - ;:$ - 0 >~ ~ ~ ~u aJ e ~\O ~o = 0 ~~ aJ \0 ......N ~............. ~~ \0 o o N ............. .......-l 0.J ............. 00 o o If) 0.J 00 \0 o o o ~ o o N ~ o ~ o t- ~ "'d (]) 8 "'d '8 (]) < ~ ~ ~ ~rn(])~ 5ca3~~: ~u~~~~ ] ca ~ ..c U '8 ~ 0 '8 0 - ~ .8 t: .9 ~ co ca ~ ~O:Bu;>~~ go"'d~:3 (])~ ~o<t::~~~ ~~q..-egO\;;; 'C <t:: <r: ~ ~~ ~ ~ > ~]~~ ~~o ] .~ Z ~ Z ~~ CO Q) .;...,~ U ~ ~ Q)~aJ~~~ .~ 6~ :-9 0 ca U ~c>goo>"Cl ~M~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ 8 ]~ ~ S "Cl ] 0\ 2: .~ v~]~~~~ ~ ~ g rn ~~.......-l <t:: :;; ~ ~ ,~ s ~u ~ -0 8 ~ ':: ;;;..;... ~co (\j o..c u ~ ~ ~ ~ :9 .~ ~ ~ 00 g.s~ ~"'d g i=.0~~~- ~~co (\j Q)~CO Q) ~ on U .t:: bO Q) ~ ~ :~ ] ~ .~ ~ uS~o.......-ld~ ~~~~~[j ~ a.r~]:sOf3 ~,ca;> urn 0 ~ ;:::i U 'G Z ~ co (])U]~\o~ aeg .~ ] .9 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ .t:: .,l:.J......... 0: If) OJ "'dU........vo (/) 0 "'d . ...... If) ~ ..- ~ ~ <t:: OJ 0 .~ o ~ Q)~ ~ -: ,5 ~ ~~~~S]~~ ...-u 32 'C 8 0 ~ ........ "D co ~ ~ .t:: If) I ~ ] "d .~ ~ ~ ~ l3 ~ ~ co bO .~ o Q) .~ 0 (]) ~ ~ ~ ~ g ....... ~ g = 'C c.S 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0\ Q) (]) (\j ~ 0 (]) ~ ~>co~2::~co2:: '"d (]) Q) :Ou .~ ~ 0> ............. ~j ~~ ~~ caca >> Q) 0 ~a \0 o o 0.J ............. t- ..- ............. o ..- o ("'f") \0 If) t- o o o ~ o o N o 0.J o o ..- o o o ~ o o 0.J o t- o t- I ~ ~o:Soo ~r:: ~~~ ..c 0 "--.......-l 0"- (/)~~ q~"' ~O~ <r: 0 (]) rn ~T:r~ ~~~] o (\j bO 0 ~ rn 0 OO~ OIf)S~ .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ g ] ~ .~ ~ Cu~ 0 ~ ~ 9 :e. <l; .s ~ 'C .S ~ .;:::: ~ ~ ~ ~~ouO\ (])a]~ ........ ~~ >~~o~ ~~ ~~~] ~ CO~rnU ~~~ EfE]OO ~<~ ~~(/)z~ ~~~ 2~d)_.......-l ~ r~ lA ca 0 d :;:: ~ U v -- U (]) ~ ~ '2 rn ~ ~ rn :"9 Q) Q) ;:J ~ ~.~ ~ (/) ..c ~ .~ v~o~ vC~ .~C ~?' ~ ~ (])\O (\j ~~.......-l ~g~8~ ~;;; "U~"""" ~ ~ ,S ~ (]) Q);;;Z ~~~ ~18:~ o (/) 0 0 0 rn (]) '...... & ~~ .~ & ~ ~ '5b ~ ~o~ rno~~< ~Urn ~og~] -O~M~~U~~ .~ :.=: .. l() .- ~ ~ ::r:: ce ~~a)~ ~~o~O ~ (\j .::: ~ Q) v Q) I (/) ~ ~ ~ (/) ~ CO.::: I :a~~gf~~~o~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~..g (]) (]) ~~~~P~Q~~ ~~:Z ~d~~"S 'E ~ ~ ~ 'E 0 ~ ~ 2 ~:~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ .~ 0 ~ U ~ <t:: 2 007.......-l0~~rnca ~~~..- ~~ ;;:~U (\j '~7 ~ ~::i:( ro ~ U32~.......-lU~~~~ I S ~ (n~ I @ ~ ~ < ~ (\j ~ S t.8 (\j~:E 0 oU<t:: 0 EUo (])u :~1J~ c.,Qrn ~ .-< ... ;:::; ~ ::::: 'E ,~ ] &l ~>l3~~>~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "d C) (]) '"d~ '"d~ (\j u (\j u o 0 0 0 ~a5 ~P5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > Q) (\j ~ o o 0.:t ~ ~~ ~ (]) ~ ~ (\j ~ > rn o (]) ~ ro (]) ~<t:: \0 o o 0.J ............. \0 I"'"""l ............. ..- ..- t- o o N ............. 7 ..- ............. 0.J o o 0.J 0.J N ('f') o o o ~ o o N ('f') -::::t ~ If) ~ o o o ~ o o 0.J o t- o t- rn ~ o ~"'~ Q) .B 0 ~C5~ ~E] .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (\j S .9 ~"' ~ 0 ~ 0 .~ U UO~Q) o .~ ca 8 ~~U~ ~.~ '"= (]) 'C Q ~ 0 Q) onQ)O > 0 5) .", 8(/)~ ~ ~"' 0 If)"- (])O.......-l ~........If) ~~o ~"d\O..- ~~~~ ca (\j ."'.9 U~~~ ~ rn OJ) t:: (]) ~ ~ 0 ]~~~~ ~~~~ P~co8 ~~~..- 3~~~ OJ q C+-i 0 rn <r: (\j .......-l 5 ~ ~ i::"' ~ S ."' ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ U ....... If) (])~.......-l ]~8[:: &Oo~o (/) ~..- ~~Q)] ~=-= ~ rn ~ ~ ~ i P~t)v .. (\j<t::t- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~~i~ ~~~~~ o ~ .~ 0 ~~o~'1~ (\j '"'U 0 I,j,# u32Q).......-l~ IS~]rn ,9 (\j 0 .~ ~ 13 U (\j ......- (\j ~<oa~~ = .;:::: 0 t- -B ~>]~S ~ co ~~ ~ :D .~ ~ .~ ~ ] g Q>~~ (\j o d ~ Q) U (\j Q) ~ ~ OJ Z ('f') If) o .......-l ~ U 2 ~ ~ o co ............. ............. ~o~~ ~~~(]) 20~;g ca ~~3 >"'d>~ (]).S Q) ~ ~~~U t- o o N ............. ~ 0.J ............. If) o t' o o t:! If) o ............. \0 o o o ~ o =It"",," .....0 =0 ~ 0 ~~ .~ 0 = 0 ~N .~ 0 Qlt- ~ o 00 o @) ~ N o ~ ~ (l) C/) .> "'0 ~ if) o 00 o o ~ b1) ~ .~ .~ VJ. ~ ~ ~ >- "'0 o (l) ..cl ~ ~ (l) Z (l) i:: ;:::$ u ~ C/) !--( ~ (l) ..cl ~ ~ ~ U ;:::$ ~ VJ. c::: '"0 00 ~t- s~ .~ ~ ~@) ~ (l) _ ;5~S E>- ;:9~ ZOU i~i :; ~] U~~ r;fj r;fj ~-- ... "0 "0 -< ~j ~~ .....~~ =C;~ ~>->- ... (l) ~ cJ~a ~ s E:t- "CO = 0 c=~ ~ t- .....N c=-- ~~ 0\ o o \0 if) o o o ~ o o N o t- ~ C/) ~~ff ~ C/) C/) !--(>-~ ~ Q) ~ (l) 1-1 U ~~s C/)~o ~~""d ~ d 0 ~ 6~ ~...t::- ~~~ ~~o ~"NU ~ 8 .S (l)~~ E5~~ ~ if) ~ S" 0000 00 0W'\ (1) ~ 8 s . "":') ~ 0 ..E~u o ~ ~ z & C/) ." 0 l-1 ~ 0 8 ~~S ~ bE 0 ro .S .~ ..o~(l) S"'O...t:: ~ @ ~ ~::co o ~ (l) ~ ~8 '5b >- ~ @ 0" d ::CU"'O t)~~] ~~o~ l-1 b1) U l-1 ~ 0 0 .~ ~" :5 :.::: Q ~t3~~ ~~"~'c; u C/) ~ u ~ ] 8 .S l-1 0 - ~~~~ ro C 00 ~ ~:.:::~~ t) ~~if) t)o~"~ ro ON l-1 ~U~~ ~e~ ~ (l) ro 'u ~ S u 0 ro ~d::Q -- ~"'O ~~ ~(l) ~ ~ ro ~ >- ~ (l) l-1 ro (l) ~~ t- O o N -- t- O -- 0\ o 0\ 00 if) ~ \0 o o o ~ o o N \0 r-'I 00 ("r'j t- O o o ~ o o N ~ o ~ 6" t- o t- ~" ~ 'a l-1 ~ U ro 1-1 ~ "'0 (]) ~ ro o ~ o o ~ l-1 ~ ~ ~ l-1 (l) ~ ~ ~ .~ (l)_~ ...r::- ~ ~ S ..E C/) ~ C/) (l) l-1 (l) 0 0 ~ 0 ~ E= 0 ~ C/) ~ 0 ro ~"~ ::c (l) 0 (l)" ~ 0 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ "'0 S ;> (]) ~ . ;::: Z(]) ~ Q '- ." ~;S ~ ::c ~ g ~ a ~~~ (l)'"d < ~ ~ C/) ~ g (]) ~ ro ~~u ~ ro 0 ~" ...t:: ~ ~ ~ (]) 0 r/)".-6 uocooo~ ..s8~r-'I~ co C/J ~ U .- (]) o~ s;S @ 0 u 0 C/) ~ C/) ;:::$ ~ (l) ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ VJ. r.Ll g .,,~ ~NCO ~ (]) 0 if) ." r~ ~ Z """" ~ v:;> C/) 00 ~ ..s (u" ~ u ~ ~ a" Q-I 0) (l) ,..J ;:::$ (l) U i:$~~~@ ~~ r.Ll (l) ~ U 'U ...t:: 0\ Q-I i:: ~ ~ 00 (]) ;:::$ (]) (]) (u" ~ U~~6~ ..E~;S;S0 "'d:;>+J Z (]) C/) 0 0 ." s..@z~~ ~~~~i:$ : .~ ~ ~ (l) ~CO~::J~ >-. co '"d ~ 2~ (l) ~:E~g .~ (l) 0 ~ Q>-~CO ~ o ~ ~ (]) ~ u (]) ~ i:$ ;..; (l) ~ u (]) ~ i:$ ~ ~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~ ;S ~~ >-. (l) ~ ~ ro ~ >- C/) o (]) ~ ro (]) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >- (]) ro ~ o """" o """" t- o o N -- N r-'I -- o r-'I t- o o N -- 00 N -- ~ r-'I r-'I \0 \0 t- o o o '1> 00 o o N o t- c.O ~" s ~ .- 0 ~ 0 ~ ~OOU~(l) >- ~ ~ 0 '"d~~ ~ ~ ~ tj ~l-1~~ ...t::~4-4C/) .-;:: ." 0 ~ 0 ~ if) '"d .- 0 !--( ~ ~ ;S C/J '"d~oSZN~ ~ ro . - I .::=: <t.:: c.O~~~..g .5 r:t: g'::; oj ~ >-~zQ~8 if) (l) ~ co C/) ...t:: ~ l-1 ~"~~o~ .- if) ~ ~ """" .~ ~ ~ c ~" ~ 0:: U oQ~~S ;:::$ (l) o~o ou~["""""' "'0 U ro (]) (l) ..cl ~ (l) ~ ~ ...r:: (]) .>. ~ 8 5 ~ ~ ~. (]) $S * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: @ >-~~~: u c.SCO ~ ~* ~ ~ tj 8 ~ .~ ~ (]) ;:::$ C/) "'0 b1) :> C/)~ (l) q~ b 8 ~lS <t.:: ~ Z ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~q0J)5V5.s _ 0 .s ~ +J ~ ro .- ~ ~ (]) ~ 'u i:$ ;:::$ ~ d co (]) t.H ~ (l) ~ "'0 ~ 0 ~ ~ -~ 2 N ~ """" .::: (l) ~ ...r:: 0 ." ~ 0 u ~~E~Q ~ 0 ;:::$ (]) (]) 0 ~o~::c~ cu +J ~~ 0"0 .~ ~ r.Ll ro C/J q i:: ~ ~ ~ S <t.:: ~ ~ .~: ffi ~ o ~ 0: t 0 C/) u~* 005 C/)E~: ~ ro["""""' 0* r.Llb O~m* o~ I ] ~: ~.s c.S ~ ~: s.~ ..E ~ ~ (u"O <5 r-'I 00" ~ 0 ~ C/) 0:: S 8 (]) ro ro r.Llr.Ll~~CO~ ~ (]) :0] .~ ~ Q>- -- ~"'O ~~ ~ (l) (]) C/) .....-1 ;:::$ .....-1 0 >~ (]) ~ ro ro ~u 00 o o N -- t- o -- N o t- if) 0\ N ~ o o o I 00 o o N o t- - - ::E 0 (])~ ..cl~ ~~ ~ ~ 8< ~~ .- ~ ~~ ~ \0 0 ~~u ~ ~.s l:>"~ ] :::s ~ l-1 O~~ s~..E .~ S .~ m 8 b1) ~~ ~ ~ "0 b1) ~~~ 6 ~ .> ;:::$ U 0 m l-1 ;S (l)~~ ..cl ro u ~u~ ~ ~ +J c.S;S~ ~ ~".s 1:: ..@ ~ b1) 0 0 ~ g ~ .,,~ ~ .~ (]) 2 ~~~ g ~ 0 ~~~ ~ ~.s d~~ ~~ C ]~s .- ::c 0 i:$ U) U ." (]) (]) ~@...t:: ~~~ bl)N 0 S +J ~ o::co~ ~ b1) (l) ..s . s i:$ 'a t: ~U) ~ N t- c; ~ (U" '0 ~"~ ro 0 u ~zj >-. co "'d (]) "'O~ ro u o 0 ~~ -- ~"'O ~~ ~ (l) ~ ~ ro ~ >- C5 (]) ~ ro (]) ~~ 00 o o N -- ~ o -- ~ o """" ""'" ~ 00 N o o o I 00 o o N o r- oS o ~ b1) o :..g U o ~co o ~" .~ ~ g (l) ~ 6 c.OU .- C/) ~ l-1 (l) (]) >- ~ o U "0 ~ (l) ~ u ~ ro (l) ca ~ 0 U 8 8 C/) (l) m ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 .~ ~ ,-l i:$z~ .. (l) r-'I o co C/) ~~~ ~ .s U 8m ~~s": (l) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 - - ~ 'a .~ ~'a ~ u 0 ~ ~ ~~~-:S r:/)~ ~ r-'I ro ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ e cu ~ ~;::( U"'O 'E ~ (l) (]) ~CO O~ C/) r-'I C/) ro o - "3 ~ o ~ Q) S o ~ W b1) o .~ o :i:!:" ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ c.S~Cij oUU ::: c.O 00" r-'I . ;::: ~ ~>j >-. ~ ~ (l) '"d~ ro g ~~ -- ~~ ~ (]) ~ ~ ro ~ >- ~ (l) ~ ro (l) ~~ 00 o o N -- ""'" r-'I -- if) o N o 00 t- ~ o o o I 00 o o N o t- ~ ~ "'d ro ~ ~ ~ (l) b1) o o ~ o Z ..cl (l) >- ;> "0 ~ if) 0\ 00 ~ ~ N 00 V) ~ U b" ~ CO (]) ~ ~ (]) o o : 0 -0 ~ b1) U 0 :g:B o 0 '> ~ ~ (]) ~c:o 0- ~~ ~ C/) C):g ~C/J ~ (]) (]) ~] .~ ~ Q>- '"d ~ >-. ~ ~ >- (l) ro ~ o o t- N 00 o o N -- \0 N -- \0 o M \0 N tr) ~~ ......0 = 0 Q.lC( "'COO .~ 0 =0 ~ N .~ 0 Qlr- ...c: V M ~ 0 ~i~ gp.,.~ ~ ~ $...4 ro ~ ~...c:...c:?" ~ ~ >~~ 2~U gp8'~~ ~ ~ CI)~~"~]~ sSZ ~..." ~ ~ ~ .- ~ r- ~ ~ ~ u~ V Nd+-,\Ooo v~ I"'"'t ....... ro t:: V ." +-' ~ --:::: ,.J ~-. ~ ~ Cd d ~ ~ .u I.V 00 .~_ a ~ ~ ~ > u ...c: ~ CI) u ~~Z~U ro~ U)< ~ ~ tr) .~ ro ~ U ~ 0 0 ~ ~ CI) 0\ ~ ~ .- ~ CI) $...4 ~ @) ~ ~ ~ .G <r: ~ 15 .~ ~ ] ~ .5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"U bn > ro~ g~~ gp~]~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 r-.;:: $...4 ~ ~ '3 0" ~ V ~ ~.S ~ 2 ~ r- ...c: :::: bO...o 0'" ~ V s::: 0.. ~ ~ l3 .s ~..s d ~ > J:; bO $...4 ~ ~ "E" ~ 1) ~ U) 0\ .- V +-' ro v 0 ~ lZl ~ tr) ~ :::: r/l ~ ~ ""d 2 ~.., bJ) ro CI) \0 . - _ lJ-i t-I ~ 2 d U ~ N 8 .~ CI) ~ ~ ~ V H ." CI) 7 ~ ~ ~ ro 0 ~~~~:.E9~~~U- ~] gb=62~~ott:1~ (1)"- ~"~~ V7~<r: oo~ > uro ].~ 2> ~ ~ r/l 0'" tr) Ur-. ~ > CI) vO\ o~" v~ Etr)] +-,<C~OO ~ u~~;::s $...4...2: u v ~B?" ;::S~~ o.s ~~~ Vr/l<C O~~ > Q...c:r- 8 ~ CI) _ u ~ u ..s 0 ~ ." v o ~ ~ v ..s $...4 v U v .9 .~ 0.. +-' ...c: v $...4 0'" ~ I.V 0 lZl~Ur/l.E...c: v v 8> ~ ~"~ v".bJ) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ lZl ..- u<r:~~ ~27~ _...c:.~ ro lZl ~ <r:.o:j 00 H ~ 'u V ~ ~." ~ r- ~ 0 8 v ~ a1 ~ 'S ::J ~" ~ v r/l 0.. +oJ ..q V $...4 bO <r: u r/l ~ <C ~ u" ~ .- ;::s 0.. ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ] ~ .S ] 0 ::J 0 0 ~~o~~<r:t~ gpgp1i ?" ~ 0'" v ~ 0 +-' ;::s .- ~ (U"E~~ gp<r: vd~ ~ ~ u 5~ ~..c ~8 o~~ ~ 'E ~ 0\ ...c: ~ g $...4 ~ V ~ ~ V +-,00 ~ .- u ] v ~ 0 :s ~ ~ b"o::~ oo:o~Z." 0~~00~~~<C<C1;)] ~ o:S ~ ~ ~ gp ~...c: ~ .~ ro ;::s ~ ~ ~ . - > .~ > o?"~ > o~- 8~~ Or/l<~""dd<=>r/lv<C ~ I ~"O~~~--g~.:s::C ~ ;5]'-~QJ~~~~0~> e.-~Z~ 5~u~ ro<C ~ _ ~ lZl :::: 0 ...c: ro 0.. "E 0..- ~ 0\ 8 .- ~ 0 ~ lZl 7 0 lZl ca Z~~~~co<C>~U>> ~~"Oi :; ~] U~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - v :g~ <> ...... (l) = (\j ~ ,...... .. 0\ .. 0 =0\ UN Q.l a ~OO "'Cg ~~ ~ 00 ......N ~-- ~b t- M N .- tr) o o o 00 o o N ~ ~ 6" r- o ~ bO .s o v U) dUro Q Cl)s;:o ~~o~ ~ ~ ~ v s::: ~ ~ s::: ~ .9 ~ g j ~ ~J2@o:S<a gOUONv ~ 0 u~S2...c: :C_ :: ~ > v, ~ $...4~~~MO v~,,~<~~ >~4-1~'1~ ;j~~,,~ o C'd r- bO ...c: ~ CI) ~ . S r/lo::JQ)~ ...0 N ~ U C\1 r/lOV ~ ~ ." 0\ ~ oS::: U ~ ." ~ ~ ~ ~ .s g s ~ U ro ~ .- $...4 lZl G'"E~~~ ~~5&~o .~ .,,::E v U .g ~~~~~o .. 0 0 ~ ~ U ~~q~O~ ~ t:: ~ bO ~ v ro __ Q 0'" ~ ~ U ~ -- ~ ~ ~~o~ ~~ ~ CI) CI) ;::s CI) ~ ~ bJ)0 ~ ~~ss~o .2 ~ U ~ '5 8 o..~r/l ...00\ r/l < (l) 1:: 0 ." N ...c: ~ 0::: ~ ..c: ~ ~ 0 ." ~ ~~..s~,,~] (U~~~~~ 's ] < u ~ s [) :0 ] ~"(:2 8 r/l~~u~~ o6u(l)~] lZl ." aJ ...c: 0 > ~Zo:S~08 032~~~~ I ;:9 <r: 0.. ~ ~ o ca .,,::J ~ u ~ U ~ bOO::: 2 ~ ~ b .s ~ ~ .-.- ~ - ;> 0:: ~ .& g ca ~ W>~CO><C o N 0\ ~ v v ~] ._ v 0> -- ~~ ~~ ~ (l) (l) CI) - ;::s - 0 >~ (l) t:: cd cd """'u 00 o o N -- tr) N -- 00 o ~ \0 ~ .- V) o o 9 00 o o N o r- $...4 $...4 ;> 0 ~ ~~ 8 S ~ g <5 ~ & ~ .J ~ ~ l3 g ~ ] ~ r/J .~ s:::~ .,,~~U~ 8~ ~g~ ~ ~~ ;3lZl~ ~0$...4~~2Za~ u"~~~~~gpo~ S ~ ~ .r; ~ ?" 0 ...c: <-H ~~W ~~ .,,~~o ~+-'O~~~?"]~ ~ ~ ~ ...c: \0 ~ rn" ~ UJ .::= 6 <C ~ 0 v ';;1 ~ ~ ~ ~ CI) ~ ...c: 0 oS::: o..-S 0--< oU~ COZo~~~~~v gf lZl Q 2 bJ) ~ ~ .- ;> 0'" v 0 U ~ bO &-E ~ v Q ...c: v .0 .S r/l r/l <C ~ g ~ E d ~ ." v ] ~ ~ ~ 8 CI) .~ @ ~ ca \0 u" U _~ ~ ~ lZl :::: u~"~ .,,0 82]~ ~ 0::: ~ ~ (u" ~ lJ-i ~ ]~~~508~8 o~ bIJ I UQN...c:~ ~~ ~~r/l ~r- 0..0 <r:>~~s:::~~.80 (u" (l) ~ ~ 0 0...- .~ lZl t:~~~aJ~~13] ;::s Q ?" r' ~ "- --< U U Uo ~ 0 ~l:J v s::: "-. e- ~ ~ f-< .... U :jj :; -6 cd uQ)~~ ~~~< ~ .a Q $...4 -" 0 g (l) tr) ~n r/l ~ gb g ~ ~ .,5 ~ "E ,S 0 ~ ~ s g gb ~ ~ ~~~~~~~Z~~ ~~c;j~~tuoco~ .~ ~ if.g .~ .3 ! ~ 8 5 s2~~Q.~ o~'"d~ ~<~ >~o Cl)0\ ~ CI) ~..-\O 0;'> U ~:::=M<C cd o..~o~;::S v~ v CI)~ ::JU~"v~d~~~~ gf] ~ ~ ~ G'~,,] ~ (u" -- +-' 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;a r~ ~ Sj ~ ~n ~ ,- H,.J V<c v v a'Clj~ ~ cd 0 ~ Z V~"Er-~ ~o::: ;::s ~ r/J - 0 ~ ::t:I: < ~ 00 ~ ~"~l3u.- ~ v a . Q) -.-- r' crc ,-t ~ l:> 0 0 M 0 Q) S 15 .e<j ~ ~~~ooo-g~~ s::::s~ $...4 ("f')tr)tr)<C~ t: ~"~ ~ 2> ~ ~ (u,,] ~ v v aJ ~ ~ (u".- :g ~ ~ ~..c:..-~ Q7_ .E ~ ~ -~ ~ i.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ._~ ~ ..s ~ co ~ r/l N ~ V..I ~ ~ v v ~] .~ ~ 0> -- ~~ 0:::0::: ~ (l) (l) U) - ;$ ..- 0 >0::: (l) t:: C\1 ro """'u 00 o o N -- ['-. N -- 00 o 00 l.rl 00 ("f') tr) o o o I 00 o o N o r- ~ ~ s::: v ~ <-H o V ~ U v ...c: ~ Q ~ \0 .- ~ Q o ~ +oJ ;::s o ~ <C $...4 ~ ~ U ~ vo -:Er- o c+-." ~] N 8 ~::E M~ 00 v ::t:I: ~ ~~ U...o v ;::s vr/l r/l~ O:~ ~O\ ~'f v .- ~r- ~oo ~ S o 0 tS~ ro v $...4~ ~ 8 ...c: v .B~ a ~ ..s~ $...4 $...4 ~~ .a ~ $...4u ~'-' g ~ ~d ~ v v ~] ._ v 0> -- ~~ ~~ ~ v v CI) ..- ;::s - 0 >~ ~ ~ ~U 00 o o N -- 00 o -- 0\ o \0 If) t- .q- =1:f;:1f) ~o = 0 ~ 0 :900 CJ 0 =0 ~ C"'l ~i2 ~"' ~..- \0 ~o ~ O\~ o ~ ~"' ~ .9 ~ ~ o -+-' a.9 ~ ~ 0 Vlt) (I) ~~ (I) ~ ~5~~&i'~j ~~r/58"t~~ SU~~~~]'o '.g 0"' r.8 0 ~ Zl ~ o:l U ..8 ~ ~ ~ 'S ~ ~ :3 ~ > ~('f")~U~ _ >-. b "'d o:l 00 ."' ('f") 00 :t:l- 0 ~ Vl ~ c;: ex; ('f") [)~~"'~~ooo~ >- * ro po- Vl 0 ."' * U (I) .~ ..d; kf 0 ~"' [) .S 8 ~; OJ) (I) ~~~~po-* O~ ~ a ."'~"' U :3 0 ~ ~]..gs ~~ ~ o <t: .~ -+-' ro ~ U 0 ~ 0 OJ) 0 ~ c::; ~ ;::$ Z ~ 0~~L'C/)::;;B~ ~ ~ ~ 0 S .9 -OJ) 0 ~ U ~ (I)-+-, O~ ~ 0 ro Vl~~ ;::$~~;::$~ 0 Vl ,",0 0 (I) ~ ~~~~] ~~0:4 (I) ~~O\~~cot::~~ ~ U ..- ro ;::$ 00 (I) -~ ~ po-e~~~~..g:9('f") o~1f) ~0:40~;::$~ ~ .~ 0 .s 0 ~ 0 0 U ~~ ~ ~~o;.ar53 ~ O~] ~~~~"'~~o <t:> (I) ~ gfro~ ~..- po- ..0 Z .~ .~ ~ > (1)\0 ~~ ~>-<t::9 ~..- 0 ~d S > (I)~ ~]O~~~~..- ]Oq~~~ 8~ (I) ~"' <t: 0 ~ ~ ~ C/) ~ (I) ."' ~ Vl 00 ~ ~ C/) .:::: ~ OJ)] ~ 0 0 ~ ..- ~ ::j s:: ~ C/) '0"\ Vl ~ ..d 0 ~ ;::$ ~ -OJ) ('f") ~ . ~ ~~~~ 0 @ ~ [)::;;B po- g ro ~ o..d~ ~ .. ~ ~ t:: b1) '-.. U ~ (I) (I)~~ (I) ~r ~ U I.J:J .~ t:: ~ > ~ .~ ~ ] a ] ] 0 po- ~ (I)~ ~~ &0 [) ~--=~roVl~-:S --- w~u (I) >0 OU '"'~~..d ~~~~~~u O~>:(I)~~~ 1::9~ 6 @~-:S .~ r.8 a > ~ ~ 00"' ~ -; ~ (I) ~ ~ ('f") U ~..-~ro&~oo~ ~ ..- 'C ~ 0 .J:J 0 ~ ~ 0\ (I); 0 0 [) ~ Z!:.il>-* U~~~ ~ ~ (I) (I) ~-- r-" .J:J U = ~:E ~ .~ (I) uo>- ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ (I) :g~ <>- ~ (I) = ro ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 = C"'l u~ ~ e E=oo "'00 = 0 ~~ ~('f") ~ ..- ~-- ~~ (I) ~ ..d 0 ~~ ] ~ ~ 0 > 0 ~ ~ S ..d OOC/) ('f") (I) ~o:l ~~ ~~ ..- N t- ..- \0 o o o 00 o o N ."' ~ (::0 ."' ~ ::;;B ."' !:.ilt; Vl (I) ] ,..0' i:5 t= ~ > ~"' 6 8 o ~ ~~ ~ g::;;B~ 00 ~5 !.9 0...4 g~ [) ~ ~ -+-' ~ ] ~ "d C/) If) \O-:s~~;::$ 0'...1, ~ .- (I) U 0:4 .~ 0 ~ Vl "d I ~ 0 ~ ro ~ U \0 ."' ;::$ ~ 0 ~~:iJco;:J::ao~.2i-;, o ~ ~ ~ .~ If) 0 ~ ~ ro U (I) ~u (I)~..cr ~o 0 ~ (I) . ~;::$ ..g ~ (I) ;::$ .q- ~ <:r.; ~ (I) Vl~ ~ ~s~ 10:4 ~ ~ 8 (I) ~ ] -+-' b1) ~ ."' 0 \,,\.I,.J . ~ r<J. -+-'0 0 0 * 0 o ~ ."' (I) 'oJ.J. Z'~ *;::$ ~ ~"'] ~ : ~ ..- ~ ~: 8 .5 --; ~ ~ '- t: B (I) *~ :> ~ U ."' ro ~ ro co ~ 0 ;;;> ~ ~~ococo"d bC/) ~ ~~(I) Vl.", ro ro ~ S ~~ Vl::J~3.J:Joo ('f")d Vl ~ 0 s~ s~ ~ ~ ;::l :3 oj t--< I:iI S I:iI . S .... o ~ N S ~ ] b ~ ~ gb.gf ~-+-,t::w~~~'O b~ S o ~~ (I)~ ~~~Q]8 u~ ~~~ro~.Et)~ ] ."' a t= ~ ~ o:l ~ .~ ~ ro 0"E~ ~ ~ (I)~~ ro (I)~ ~ ~ Cn"'8u] ~]"'~~] a~ ~ -+-' ~ O~~o* ~ .. ro .~ ~ ::;;B ~ ."' g If): 0 ] 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ .s ii5 :: t s (l)W~~~~]os~]..g Vl ~~ ;::$"d_ 0 ~(), o ~ ro ~ ~ - ~ 0 d (I) ~ OOU~<t: ro ~~ o~ .~"' ~ \0 (I) ~u~ OJ)~PO- (I) ."' 0\ ~ (I) ~ 0 1--1 (I) ~ ] 00 ~ > ~ Zl ....... ~ ..d :< ~ \0 ....., 'C ~ .- 0 0 ~ ~ ~u,c/)o'OOd~ _ .~ (I) 0\ 0 q ::J ~ ~ a 'a ~~~o]<t:~(I)]Z~ $::]o~]~~~~~ ~ U-If) 0 > "E>~ t=;::$ ~ e l3 \0 ~ .~ (I) ~ ~ ~ S ~~~ '"'~~~~-zo] ~ Qj d ~ ~ 0 U (I) ~ ~ U 0 0 ~ Q ~"' ~ cr.J Cd"' QJ <0 'E ~ r~ ~ ~ U ';> -+-' -+-' ~ (I) 1--1 ~ (I) e .~ "d W g > C/) ~"' ~"' ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "d o (I) ~~ (I)]~ o~w~ g'O s~~ofE~ OJ) a ~ cr.J > 0 1::.J:J 0 "'0 -uro ~ ~ ~ ! 0 0 bE u .~ >- -+-' Vl ~ -+-' fr.S ~ 0 0 I 0 0 ~ (I) ;::$ ~ ~ .~ ~ cr.J ~OUZ~~O (I) ~~ Vl~ ] ~ g u ~ > ~ "'0 ] .0"\ o~~ Vl~ ro_ ~ 0 ~ ..- 0 ~ l' (I) ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ..- ro U (I) S ro (I) (I) > b1) ~a :~~u~a~~~ "E~ (I) 0 ] ss ~ U ~ ;::$ ~~s ~ ~ ~ .!8 ~ >- (I) ro l--.i 00 ('f") C"'l ~ 00 o o N -- \0 ..- -- o .- o \0 ('f") .q- \0 o o o 00 o o C"'l o t- Vl ~ ~ ."' M"'::J (I) a C/) ~ ~]..d ~ ~> ~"' 1Il..d ~ ..g () r::: ~ > ~gfoU~QtS ~"'d ]~~8~~ ~ b (I)~ 6ro..- gf~~~~~ !oj U ."' ~ 'M (I) ~ "'>. t- o <r:; ."' ~ ~ ~ ~ ..d ;::$ ..0 0 .9 bJ) t- ~ ro U 0 ~ _ ~ ~oo~~B~ v~ ~'EoCQ~co ~ gf~:~: U (I) 0 0] l..AJ 3 d ..- S ;.a ~ U '.g ] .:.. . Q) . >-. ~ ~ 0 ro ~ ~ (I) .~ ~ ~ ~- Q) c2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ;.a 'Q) Vl ~ ~u gf&i'3o ~ &~:3 ~ co (I).~ ~ Z "" (I) (I) "d 1" (1) zO!:.il] g !oj C/) 0 o..d ~ OJ)~ 0 <r:; l &~~OON ~ "' (I) I Vlcr.J~b~;.a]~ }~~.8';::: ON.g~] ~~If)~~::tS~ ~[)~ ~ I I t- M"' ~ ro 0 (I) "'d ~ ~ ~~o 0 Vlr=: ~~~o U ~ ('f") ."' ro ~ (I) Vl ~ (I) ro >~~o~~~~ Vl ~ S "d U (I) ;.a (I) r.fl'~ ~ ~ -:s ~ ~ ~ ~ .5 .~ "'0 Q ~ ~ 0 ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Vl ~ ~co~ ro~ ~ ~&o:l~ (I) ~ b1) s ~ C"'l 0 o:l ~ ~ .~ ~ o ._ ~ C"'l Z ~ w (I) co ~:Q~ffi;g [)o Cn"'~",] ~ s::: U (I) .", > .- ..0 ~ ~ ..d ~B > >:~ (I) Vl~.!8~~ ~ co . Q) ro S ~ 'S 0 . a ~ "'0 o cU ~ ~ .S ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ OJ)::;;B C"'l ,",00 U ] 5 ~ ~ _'- N [) M ro ~ tH (I) Vl ~ ~ C"'l If) ~ .", ~ ~ 0 ~ 8u-:sso ug~~8 ] ~ ~ .- 0 ."' ~ If) ] 00 U ]~.J:J~~~~8~ (I) ~ ~ rJ'1 ~ ~ ~ ~."' ~ ~ (I) 0 - ~ ~ 0 'c 0 > .~ ~Z~~(I) ~~ 5 g~~ ~ i:f 00"' ro ~ ~ ~ ~ !oj ..q- (I) ~~- (I)~ (I) 0:.8~00~ ~o--;~~~Z~d)b~ Qj 0 U ~ (I) ~ ~ ] d ."'.~ U ~ ~ rJ'1 o:l 0 0 'a 0 ~ ~ .~ r: ~ 0 ~ "S S r: ~ 0 ro ~ ~ ~ ~ goo.", [) ~ ] roC/) 0> C/)* ~ v 0 ~o 0 ."' (I) ~ (I) b1) * .~ ,9 ..q ~> (I) ~ 0* ~~~ Vl 60 C3 ~ ~:.::=: 0 ."' ~ ."' C"'l af ~ 0 ~ ~~ u32..sg~~U~~::J~ I ::9 .S Z 0 U ~ ~ 0 gp 0 o ~ ~ > C/) (I) ro U .:::l 0 ~u I ~~ o~d Vlc3~"' >-.~ ~~O Vl ~~ ('f") ~ <.H" > ..0 ~ ~ "'0 "'d ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C ~ OJ) 00 0 ro 0 0 -B _ 0\ (I) ;::$ .~ t- "'0 0 ~ 0 .~ 0 ~>-U~o>~~UQ~ ~ 0:4 ~ (I) ~~ ro g ~~ -- ~~ ~ (I) (I) Vl - ;::$ - 0 >~ (I) ~ ro ro l--.iU 00 o o N -- 00 C"'l -- o ..- r- N l/l ~ :t:I:r- ~O =0 ~ 9 ~oo .~ 0 == 0 ~ N ~ o ~ ~~ .,. 0 ~t'- ~~~ Cd ~ oo~",~ ~ U ^~OO]~~Q) c:r ~ ~ = ~ rfJ 0] r./) ."' ~ ~ ~ "I 0..9:E CI) N ('1") U~~ZU> Q)\O ~'5 Q) bJ) ~ ~ ~ rfJ ~ ~ ...c:u ~ ~ 0.-0 ~ ~~~r-!-. ~ 8C:.d<C~~~~~ ~~"' ..g ~ t5 ~ -B -:S ~ ~::t:l:::: 0 ~ u ~ 8 00 .- 0 ~ Q) Q) .- oU~N~~~~8~Q ~~..!:l~Q).B >-...c:~~ rauBl/l ~~] Q)~o g .5 ~ Q 0 ~ Q) ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ >- ~ ~ 00 8...c: $::1 ta v:> ro ('1") Q) ~ 0 ..!:l $::1 ~ ? ZB~~p~~O~~ ."'~~ ~ ~l/l o~oo"cr o .-0 U Q) 0 0'\ U ro ."' <l) ~.- Z 0 00 $::1 U ~ ~ :~ r;) ~ t:: Q)S ~: ~ ~ 0 .~o- ] .E t=: ~ ~ 0 ] ~ [) Z Cd~~qOU~~~~o ~]~~~l~.6.g~~ ~o ~~~ Q)O'\~~~ &3 .~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~~ ~"' ~ ~ d ~ ...... U o-.,~ 00 .~ .~ o~ H ~ ~ ~ rfJ 0 .0'\ ;::: ~ <l) r.8 8 <l)U ~ ~N-=dOO ~ $::1~ ~U'J~ ~9~~ ~o ~]8]~g~~2~~ rfJ ~ Q)~ rouO'\ ~ ~ ro a~ ~ d ~..!:l~ ~:> o~ ~ \I~ ~ ~ ~ OJ) ro <l) ~ ~ "'d rfJ ~ Q) Q)~ ~ur./)~~~ Q) ~ co .~ u 0 ~ . ~ r-' Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ..t= ~ .:5 .-d"' U ~ ro rfJ 0 co ~ .- ~ Q) OJ) ~ :]"'::J Q) ~~~~ 0 ro ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .~ ',p ~ :> 0.. o~~~o::o~ U'J ~:::u Q) Q) 0 zl3 ~ ~ :0 S ::J 0 ~ ~~OoO~ o~~ o~___ ~~ '-l..tU~;::::U~~ ~] ~"'"Ed5co(3~l/l~ .. Q)ta 0 0 ~~ 0 ~O'\"'d ~~ ~Z~ S~~~~ Q) .- 0.. ~ .- Q) W ~ -H- . ~ 0 ~ ~~ bJ)~~oU-H-~~ Q) U'J )oo.(). 0 N U'J 00 ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 4-. a':.g ~ ~ 0'\ ~ 0 OJ) 0 o . (5 00 (oj"' ~ ~..!:l ro r~ _ ~Q) .~ ~ 0 ~ <r: ~ ~ ~ V f"f'I ~ * "'d Q) "'d ro=i{~ d: ~ 5.~~~ O~ S~ 8 ~ roU'J ~~~ '82~~~~oQl~ ~ ~ w r-' '-" 0."' ~ t) ~ ~ oU $::100~ ~~~~"'2.p ~~~~Ms~~C;~.g~ ~ 0'\ Q) ..s ro 0 0 ('1") .-0 0 ~ 7: Z~>-U'JUUZ~<O~C ~ "'d Q) Q) ~-- =~] ~ .- Q) UO>- rIJ rIJ ~ --- "'" ~ ~ < "'d"'d ~~ ~ (!) ~ ~ ~ == ro ~ ~ :> rfJ "'" (!) 8 = ro Q) u~<r: ~ a E:oo ~o == 0 ~~ ~ N ......0 ~--- ~~ o 0'\ 0'\ ~ ~ o o o "" o o N ~t:: o .~ ~ ~t;~ .~ Q) ~ Q)-oB .>-. R ] .... ~ s . ~:;:: 0 f.H- 8 S ~ bJ) ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ .C U ro "'d .S Q) .a U;:j . "' Q)~U'J q~ ~~ta~~~ >- ~ Q) ~ i::2 0 ",...c: bJ) <C ~...c:o~U...c:~Q ~ ::s ~ ~ \0 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ rfJ ~ <C .... Q) ~ ~ 0 r- ro "'d.-o \0 ~ ~ .8 ~ . ~ >- 0<C 5=> 0 ~ ~ rfJ1" ~ ::J ~ ~ ~ 0 '"0 ~ ~ 0 ..~ o Q) ~.-oU<C ~ Q)~~ U'J ;:::: ro 0.... 0 ~ .... 00 .... ro ~ 0 "E ~ ~ U ~ ~ "'d ~ U ~ 0.. Q) \0 ~ ~ \.'4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::;s z ~"' 0 "'" ~'u -:S ] ~ 8 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ u 0 Q) 0 < j ar ~ 0 rfJ ~<C q~~=> bJ)~ ~ 0 ~ :> Q) <r.: ~ '"0 ~ 0 "'" .~ ~ ..t3 ..!:l ~!:r --:j ~ o. ;::: 00 ~ ."' "'d ~ rfJo H~ ~ Q)t'- 0~<C "'d ro ~::;s.~ 0: ~ ~ t) ~u ~o ~~~~"'O ~ ::1:: ~ ~ 11 0 :$ OIl "0 ~ 13 ~ :::::: ~ <r.: ~ "'" . S ~ ~~ U ~ ro Q) ~"'do~ N ~ ~ d)~~ 00'\ ~~('1")"'O ~ ;!a ~ (3 Q) ~ ~ ~ .~:9 ~ ~~- ~ "'" u Q)~ r..OU'J~"'Oo4-.0~~~~ ._ ~"' ~ z ~ 0 0'\ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) QNU'J ~('1") ~~ rfJ~ >- ...t:: Q) ~ r- 0 S ~ ..0 ..9 u ~~~~~ 0 ...~uS ~~.-o rn~ .,,~~~~ ~ ro ~ bJ) ~ ~ gf r/) "'d "'d . ~ .-sn ~ ~] B;ij::: G ~ a .~ gf o ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ z U ~ .;1 o q .~ ~ ~ l/l ~ '"'..!:l ..::a:::; ~ <r: ~ 0 ~ \0 - ~.t::: t) t) Q) bJ) <C ~ ~ ro .- ~ :..:3 ~ ~ ~ .S ~ U ~ ~"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~Cd ~4-.0~~'f~z ~ o ."' g Q) >- l/l 0 ~ ~~ ~~..6 Q) ~.s~ ~ ~ U'J~r./)~ ~0~00] rfJ ~~ Q)<t: oU roQ~ ~ roO ~ggo rfJ~~::t:l:::::> ~ U S ~ l/l ':;j t) t'- 0 .S '"0 ~~ ~ 0 ~ . ~ ~ ~ .:"' 0 :> ~ 'l.I'"'O~ o~gc~ ~ u .S "'d ~"':g ~ 0 ~ g -*" \0 .;; ~ ~ ~ ~ v "'d .a- ~ * ~ ~ Cl)Cdo~~~~* U'J $::1~u~~ ~o ~ ~ t~ 4-. 0 .0'\ r/) bJ) \0 ~ Z 0 ~ ~ o ~ "'d .o:j $:l ~ - ~ ~ bl) rfJ 0 ~ ,..Q .- ~ ro "'d 0 Q) rfJ ~ ~ ~ ~ <C >- ~ I .~ ~~ ..........Uro .u ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 o ~ ~ .- ~ ~ \0 ~ ~ I ~>- 8;::.0 gf~~~ rfJ<C ~ "'d Q)._ ~._ ~ ." ~ "'d Q) $::1~ ro~ $:l ~ 0 OJ)~ 0 ~ ~~~ ~o ~Q) 04-. o~ ~ .~ S t:: rfJ :-9 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~0~~~8~~* ~~~~~~<r:~o: ~ ~~ Q) $:l ] ~ ~ ~~:g '"0 ~ ~ ~ Cd >- Q) ro ~ 00 ('1") N "'" 0'\ o o N --- \0 o --- ('1") o ~ o 00 \0 N o o o I 0'\ o o N o t'- ra~"'~o .c , ~ CI Q) ;:j ..0 ~ :>u~~ U'J~~ ] ro'" <C ~ Q) 1.1') ~~~ ~.~~. "'dU~...t:: ~ ~ Q) ~ ~~~] . - i-'oI 0 :E ~ g .S Q) ~UCJ).CO ~~] ~ "'d ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ) ~ ~ $:l t) r./) ~~Jj Q) ~ Q) '"d~]:> ~ .~ ~ 0 >-.0.. N ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~~Q) :>roo~ ~ :g Q) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ...t:: Q)~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & Z r/) "'d rfJ"'d~<r: ~ q .S Q) ~<r.:~c;3 .~ g 0'" ] ~U5~~ rfJ .~ 0 U Q) ~ .s U ~.S =>~0;::::~ ~ ~ ro 0 ;u ] ~ :B U .~ ~ ~ E 0 , 0. 4-l .~:g Q)~ Q)..g~ ~ bl)~ U'J 0 o .S 0 0 ~ rfJ '"0 U Q) ~ rfJ ro o~ Q) ro~~~o C?~0.~] ~~.s~o o ." $:l ~ ~ ~ 01 0 '-l..t Cl)~ ~ rfJ U "'d rfJ ;;: S ~ 5 g wW~U'J~ ~ ~ .-0 Q) "'d~ ro u o 0 ~~ --- ~~ ~ Q) Q) r/) .......... ~ - 0 >~ Q) f:: ro ro ~u 0'\ o o N --- 0'\ N --- "'" o \0 ("i") ........ 7 :J:t:O ............. = 0 ~O ~~ .~ 0 == 0 ~ ("'l T-"I l""'-- ~~ +-> o l.......t .J:::JO"'d o ~~ oo~>- O~ <t: ro~ gf("i") ~ ~ ~ Q) .~ ~ .;3 . ~ -0 == W 1.\,1 Q) 0 ...c: 0 \O::c<w OO~~::EU...c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ] ~ .~ ~ o Z ~ CO 0 ::c 8 '.0 ;>. 0 +-> U 0 ~ .Q) ...c: l""'-- ~ 0 Q) ("'l ~ ~~] ~>~. ~~~3 ~ ~ ro ~ co ZO ,~ U ~ .J:::J ~... ~ o 0 ~.... ~ +-> ...c: '"d 0 '"d ,.J ....... "'g t::: .... ro 0 b.O ~ '"d 0 ~,...-. ~ Q) ~ "'d . ~ +-> "'- ;:::$ '"dCO 0 ~~>-~oo~ 0 .5 ~ Q C/J ~ .... ("'l 0 $oj ~ ;:J Q) ~ 0 -i .~ l/") 0 ~ '"d Q) ~ C/J "'d ~ 7 b.O 0 ~ Q)~~ Q) >...c: Q) 00 ("i") ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ -0 r; :B 0 .~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ :9 CO ::c ~ ~ ~O~ U>-SOl""'--O~b.O ~ C/J .~ 0 ~ l""'-- ~ ~ 0 ~ Q) ~ ~ 0 CO ~ ~ > ~ .& 8~S-S~b.O~7"'dU~ 00 ('j 0 ~ 0 ~ l""'-- ~ .... m Q) ., ~ ~ ~ 'M Q) 0\ '"d ~ ~ .... ~ <r: ~ +-> \0 ........ "'- ro o Q) +-> ()~~\O~U == 0> ~ ~... ~ ..9 0 ::E 0 W 'U O",-C007 ....0 0 3 '"d 00 '"d ~ .... ......... () "'-1\ ~ ~Q)a>-(UQ) :\O~~~ , p E U b.O ~ i:: : ~ ~ '.0 '> ... '"1""'1"'" 0 ~ ;:::$ .... l""'-- ~ .~ ;;> ~~~~~~~~:9~Z ~ ~ ~... U 1;) ,5 Q) ~ 0 '"d ~ O~ ~ ~ .... ;:::$ ~ CO ....::c ~ Q) ~ Q) 0 ...... CO E 0 <t: ...c: ~e~~~~~~~~t ~ ~ (5 '"d ~ .... (5 'u g ~ ~ ~ b.OZ ro("i")~'"d3 ()O'"d .;S 0 ... 3 ........ 0\ >- ~ ~ Q) 'u ~ 'bb ~ ~ 00 ~ +-> ...c: ~ ~ () ~~~] ~~ ~> ~~~ ~~~~~...~~("'l~ ~~ ~~'"d8~0~Q)'"do~ ~JJ~ >-~tj~] > Q) .. 0 0 ~ ~ ::c m '"d l-t ~ :E U ~ < ...c: Q)'" m ~ ~ Q) 'S: ~ Q) 8 .t:: Q) Q) ("'l l""'-- ~ ~.:"'~ C/J~Jj~8~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~ O;:::$~ l-t 0 0 000;.;:: ~ ~ m () l-t ~ 0 roo ....~ 0.. m m ~ ~ 00'" ("i") ::E bO.;g 0 00 >- ~uro ~ C\S d ........ .... 0 ~ \0 Q) u'" U j.:; 00 +-> .- ~ ~ I 0 0 0 ~ ;:::$ .- ~ ~ S .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g;"'1 .~ ::E+ ~ < ~ .....~~ ~ ~l(I 0 @ ()l' ~ 0 '"d ~ \0 U 0 .- ~ t) t: ::: ~ '00 '"a 0 S Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ z~a~~~~~~~~o ~E~ ~ Q) 0 =] ~ c ~ () l-t ;::1 U~~S "'d ~ ~ ~ ~ . Q) :g~ <>- d ~ ~ ~ .0 . ~ =' ........ u~ ~ is E=O\ ~o = 0 ~~ ~ l/") ..... ........ ~-...... ~~ ("i") ........ ("i") ~ o ........ o o ~ o o ("'l .... ~ t;o .... ~ ::E~ ~l""'-- Q) S Q) ~ l-t ~ 0 ~ Z-O .m 8 ~ n ~ 00 u ...~~~~... ~ m~ ~ Q)]OO..9~ Q)~ gf-o g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. C5 ~ ~ .g, ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 CO 0 m ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ o~s~~~~~~():E u '"d ~ U Q) C/J '00 l-t S S ] Q) Q) 0 Q) ...c: '"d ~ ~ U ro ~ ~'"dz...c:~~'"do\O~g O~*~OZQ)~........ ~ ro Q)* Q)O ~~........ ~co a 8:: ~ C/J ~& bOrn '"d $ ..i:f .s Cl ~ ~ ~.s 01 .3 ~ ()~("'l ,,~~~~~ ~...~ ~>~=3 ~EO\ 0 ;::1 0 ~ '"d . - 00 ~ 00 cT U o ~ ("'l ~ ;::1 Q) ~ ~\ Q) 0 ("i") C/J ~ ... 0 0 '\:::V ~ .- Q)~ o"E* ~o cT oo:g .~ E ~ 0: ~ ~ ~ l/") 0 <5 ro~ +->* Q) m ~oo ro ~ ~~ Q): d: ~~ ~ (u...~ o () ::c 0 * Q).- \0 ~ 0 ." u 0 S -0 * ;::1 ~ .... ~ ~ E Q) 0 0; ~~ gfBoo g ~~~ ~o~("'l~OO 0 ~ ~~~U~~\08~~~ o;:J Q) Q)] Q)~ ~Q~~ ~ ." Q) ~ ~ Q) Q) - \0 ~ 00 > ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~" ;:J c.S .- ~ "'d ~ > ~ m ~ ~ ~~u~~~1:f~00~ ~... Q) +-> Q) m'" l-t 'U ~ l/") Q) Q) m ~ ...c: d ~ l/") ~ ~ 00 ...c: () ~ 0 00 0 ~ ~ g ~w ....~ 00 ~ o. _ ~" ~ u ~ II" ~ d ~ ..~.-. ~"'u ~~O ~~~~: 0 Q) bO~O~ ~ ~ ~ s: .~ a .-5 < ~ < ._ ;:;> () Q) * ~ ~ ~ ~ co m ~~(l)~:~"""";:::$~o~ ~ ~ ..Qu ~" ." 00 Q) cT'- ~ ;:::$ 00 ro ~;>..... "'d Q) gb bO () '"d E5 0 >- ~ ~ (/) ~ ~ .S ~ ~ l-t~ Q)'"d~ m\O ~c3~ ~B"S~ ~ g~~~ m~ 8 ~~.s~ ~8~ 1f~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ r:: .... ~ 0\ ~ l-t .... ~ ()...c: l' ("i") ~ Q) '-v-' '"d ;:::$ ~ Q) ..- ~;::1 00\0 orn~ ~\O Q) ro () 0 C5 g~~ gp:::~ ~s~~ ~ ~ ;:::$:.s~ 0 ~...c:~ Q) ~ ('j 3 ::c ;:s g Z ~ U d ...c: ;::1 o ~ .... 00 ~ 0 .... 0 ~ ~ ~ IUO]V)COQ~~o~o ,9 C\S ("'l bE ;>. 0 "'d Q 0 ~ '"1""'1 Q) ~ 0\ d Q) ;>.~ ;>.~ m o ~ Q) +-> .- ...c: ;:::$ "'d ~ 2 0 :: 8 ...c: ~ -:S ~ d Q) ~ ;::1 ~ T-"I ro ~ ;S ~ > +-> 6 '-8 ~ > ~~o~~~c3~~~u E~ Q) ~ ] ~ c () l-t ;::1 ~~s '"d ~ ;>. ~ ~ >- Q) ro ~ M 0', 0\ M 0\ o o ("'l -...... o ~ l/") o ("'l 0\ tr) 0\ M o o o ~ o o ("'l o l""'-- Q) "'d co S ~ Q) ~ ro Q) "'d ...c: ;;S>~~~ 0'" m > ~ > u;:J~ 'U 0 oosi3::E .~ ~ 0 0 a ~"'d~]u ro Q) ~~ ~~oo~ 'B~80~ ro ~~ Q) Q) ~~~~~ ~ 0'" ~ ~~ bO ~ ~...c: ~ .S ~ >- ~ ~ "'g ~ bE ~ "'d ~ ;:s .s >- ~ ....26~Q) ~~~~"O .~ ~ s ] ~ t~]~d) o ::::: ~ () d t)~d)S~ ~ ~o ~ U l' m 0 ~ ~ ~~...~d)] ("i") ~ gf~ ~ ~ ._ ._ ~ ~ Fl ." ~ C m ro ~ ~~~>-~8 o ~ " l-t +-> o:l ug1i~]l-t ~ () co ....~ e- &~ ~~ s ~ o~~l/") Q)O\ o m ~ 0 ...c: \0 uro~~~f! ~~~l""'--l-t~ ro l-t ;:J ("'l 0 0 Z~"'dO\~("i") ;...,... uro Q) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~C\S~ c3<~b~~ ~~~*~8 o ;:::$~~Q)...c: ~~ros~= ;:J~ 0 ~Q) ~Q) >U..Eu ;:JC/J"'d"'d~ bOg~ ('j () ~ .s ~ l""'-- ~ S > c3 t: ~ b.O ~ ~" ~8uo]~~ .a 0 () ...c: ~ r./) ~ .s ..9 ~ ~ ~ ~:gCOd).s g~oo"'~g ~~~oo~ ~u~~~~ ;>. co "'d Q) '1::::;S~ ro () o 0 ~~ -...... '"d"'d ~~ ~ Q) Q) m ~ ;::1 --' 0 >~ Q) t:: ('j ro ~u 0\ o o ("'l -...... ("i") ("'l -...... \0 o .. ." .. - .... ImIIIIIIEI -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ROANOKE V ALLEY AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) POLICY BOARD David Trinkle, Chair Billy Martin, Sr. Richard Flora, Vice Chair Joe McNamara Doug Adams Richard Caywood Tony Cho Alvin Nash Tammy Davis J. Lee E. Osborne Melinda Payne Jackie Shuck Darrell Feasel Ron Smith Carolyn Fidler William E. Holdren, Jr. Dave Wheeler PROJECT TEAM Matthew Rehnborg Jake Gilmer This report was prepared by the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Or- ganization (RV AMPO) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A), and the Virginia Depart- ment of Transportation (VDOT). The contents of this report reflect the views of the staff of the Roanoke Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO staff is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The con- tents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the FHW A, VDOT, or RV ARC. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. FHW A or VDOT acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/ approval of the need for any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project level environmental impact assessments and/ or studies of alternatives may be nec- essary. 2 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 CHAPTER 1: TRAFFIC INFORMATION ....................................................................3 ... ... ~ - ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Ov e rvi e w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Vehicle Type and Traffic Information...................................................................8 Accidents...................................................................................................................1 0 B rid ge Conditions. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .11 CHAPTER 2: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT.....................................................13 Residential Development...................................................................................... .14 Commercial Development................................................................................... .15 Industrial Development....................................................................................... .15 Insti tu tionaIProperties.......................................................................................... .15 Future Land Use.................................................................................................... .16 CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING........................................................19 N on- motorizedF acilities....................................................................................... .20 Hi s to r i c Res 0 ur c e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Endangered Species............................................................................................... .22 Water Resources...................................................................................................... 22 Wetlands. .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . ..24 TABLES Table 1- Road Characteristics..................................................................................5 Table 2- Current Traffic Volumes...........................................................................8 Table 3- Projected Traffic Volumes........................................................................ 9 T able 4- A c ci d en t Data..........................................................................................1 0 Table 5- Bridge Conditions................................................................................... .11 MAPS Map 1- Traffic Information................................................................................... .12 Map 2- Current Zoning.......................................................................................... .17 Map 3- Environmental Screening: City of Roanoke..........................................25 Map 4- Environmental Screening: Roanoke County.........................................26 4 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 TRAFFIC INFORMATION 1 STATE ROUTE 116 IS AN IMPORTANT LINK between the Roanoke Valley and Smith Mountain Lake in Franklin County. Many residents of Roanoke make frequent trips to Smith Mountain Lake for recreation or to second homes, while full-time residents in Franklin County use Rt. 116 to travel to Roanoke for employment or shopping. The full extent of Rt. 116 extends from Rt. 122 in Burnt Chimney, Franklin County to Rt. 101 in the City of Roanoke. The purpose of the Route 116 Corridor Review is to provide data and information for Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to use in their planning process. It examines the portion of Rt. 116 from the Franklin County line to Jeffer- son Street in the City of Roanoke. The information collected will be use- ful in developing the Roanoke County and City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plans, as well as [Purpose and Need" statements for projects along the corridor. Environmental screening data contained in the Review will also help identify issues early in the planning process that may need to be addressed under provisions of the National Envi- t"'- ".; ".-- r :\~ ronmental Policy Act (NEPA). l 0 -"-: ~ OVERVIEW State Route 116 is a two lane highway that runs in a southwest-northeast heading from State Route 122 in Franklin County to State Route 101 in Roanoke City. This corridor study will focus on the section of the road between Franklin County and Jef- ferson Street in Roanoke City. Route 116 is known by several names in this section. When it first enters Roanoke County it is known as Jae Valley Road. Its name changes to Mt. Pleasant Boulevard in the /j community of Mount Pleasant. After its !/ intersection with Route 658 in Roanoke City, its name changes to Riverland Road SE. Riverland Road SE continues until it reaches Piedmont Street SEe Route 116 briefly uses Piedmont Street SE until it reaches Walnut Avenue SEe It then turns west onto Wal- nut Avenue SE and remains there until it reaches Jefferson Street. This section provides brief a summary of Franklin County the physical characteristics of the road in the studied corridor. This information is also available in Table 1. FRANKLIN COUNTY LINE TO BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY State Route 116 enters Roanoke County from Franklin County through a pass in the Blue Ridge Mountains known as Windy Gap (Elevation 1257 ft.). The road's elevation decreases 330 feet in the first 0.7 miles of the corridor as it descends into the Back Creek basin. This portion of the road contains steep grades and several tight turns. After it passes over Back Creek, the road straightens and assumes a more level course for the next 1.41 miles until it reaches the Blue Ridge Parkway overpass. Route 116 is given a functional classi- fication of "major collector road" from the Federal Highway Administration in this section. The U.S. Census classified this area as "rural." The speed limit is 55 mph. The road has an average lane width of 10 feet and, as noted earlier, has several tight turns as it descends the Blue Ridge Mountains. The road I has earth shoulders that are 1 foot wide I -I between the Franklin County Line and I -- - - - -- - I Back Creek and 2 feet wide between One of several sharp turns on Rt. 116 as it descends the Blue Ridge Mountains 6 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. There is one bridge in this section of the road (Virginia Structure 1087) that is used to cross over Back Creek. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY TO RIVERLAND ROAD SE After State Route 116 passes under the Blue Ridge Parkway, it enters into a census- designated "Urbanized (3C)" area. From this point until the end of the studied cor- ridor, its Federal Functional Classification is "Urban Minor Arterial." Route 116 passes through the most densely populated areas of the Mt. Pleasant community in this section and serves as the primary transportation artery for that community. The speed limit decreases to 45 mph in this section. The road has an average lane width of 12 feet and 4 foot wide earth shoulders between the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Roanoke City boundary, which is 1.17 miles away. After the road enters the City of Roanoke, the average lane width decreases to 10 feet and shoulders are eliminated entirely. MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD SE TO 9TH STREET SE This section begins at the intersection of State Route 116 and State Route 658. At that point, Route 116's name changes from Mt. Pleasant Blvd. SE to Riverland Rd. SEe Additionally, the average lane width increases to 12 feet. The road continues to have no shoulders. Between the beginning of this section and the Riverland Rd. SEjBennington St. SE intersection, which is only 0.16 miles away, the speed limit is 30 mph. After it passes that intersection, the speed limit increases to 35 mph. Between Bennington St. SE and 9th St. SE there are two traffic signals. The first is located at the intersection of Riverland Rd. SE and Garden City Blvd. SEe The second is at the Riverland Rd. SEj 9th St. SE intersection. Both are three-way intersections. There is one bridge in this section (Virginia Structure 1828), which is located a short distance to the east the of the Garden City Blvd. SE intersection. Table 1- Road Characteristics I ErQm Franklin Blue Ridge 2 10 Earth 1-2 55 1087 County Line Parkway Blue Ridge Riverland 2 10-12 Earth/ 0-4 45 Parkway Road None Mount Pleas- 9th Street 2 12 None 0 30-35 1828 ant Road 9th Street Jefferson 2 11-12 None 0 25 1815,1816 Street Source: Statewide Planning System. Virginia Transportation and Mobility Planning Division. Richmond, 2007. ... ... ~ - ~ CHAPTER 1 -TRAFFIC INFORMATION- 7 9TH STREET SE TO JEFFERSON STREET Shortly after State Route 116 (Riverland Rd. SE) passes the 9th St. SE intersection, it enters a residential neighborhood known as Riverland. Sidewalks have been con- structed along portions of both sides of the street as it passes through the neighbor- hood. Street parking is permitted on the north side of the road in the neighborhood. The speed limit is 25 mph and the average lane width varies between 11 and 12 feet. Riverland Rd. terminates at its intersection with Piedmont St. SEe At this point, Route 116 turns to the left (southwest) while it briefly uses Piedmont St. SEe Less than one-tenth of a mile later, Piedmont St. SE terminates at its intersection with Walnut Avenue SEe Route 116 then turns to the right (northwest) and continues along Walnut Avenue until it reaches Jefferson Street. Two large bridges are found on Walnut Avenue SE during the short distance that Rou te 116 uses the road. The first - Virginia Structure 1816 - passes over the Roanoke River. Immediately after this bridge ends, another- Virginia Structure 1815- begins. This bridge carries the road over Norfolk and Southern Rail-lines and Williamson Road. Shortly after this bridge ends, the road reaches the end of the studied corridor at its intersection with Jefferson Street. VEHICLE TYPE AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC Table 2 lists 2006 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data, 2006 truck traffic data, and 2005 vehicle-per-hour (VPH) counts for the studied corridor. According to this information, the busiest section of State Route 116 is found between Bennington St. SE and 9th St. SE in the City of Roanoke. 9th St. SE and Bennington St. SE-whose intersections designate either end of this section-are urban collector and minor arte- rial roads, respectively, in southeast Roanoke City. Route 116 is the southern termi- nal of both roads and, as a result, is frequently used as a connection or access road for vehicles moving between or to those routes. In addition, Garden City Blvd. SE also Table 2: Current Traffic Volumes 2005 VPH Franklin County Line Back Creek 5,275 1 % Back Creek Blue Ridge Parkway 5,275 1 % Blue Ridge Parkway SCL Roanoke 5,766 1 % SCL Roanoke Riverland Road 7,791 1 % Mount Pleasant Road Bennington Street 7,791 1 % Bennington Street 9th Street 9,480 1 % 9th Street Piedmont Street 7,806 1 % Riverland Road Walnut Avenue 4,466 1 % Piedmont Street Jefferson Street 5,579 1 % Source: Statewide Planning System. Virginia Transportation and Mobility Plan- ning Division. Richmond, 2007. 633 633 636 759 763 818 781 496 513 8 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 terminates at its intersection with Route 116 in this section. Garden City Blvd. SE is one of the primary routes for vehicles traveling between Garden City and downtown or southeast Roanoke. Three of the other sections of the road that are located in the City of Roanoke reported vehicle counts in excess of 7,000 per day. The only two sections that did not exceed this level are found at the end of the corridor when the route briefly travels down Piedmont Street SE and Walnut Street SEe At the other end of the study corridor in Roanoke County, traffic counts were between five and six thousand vehicles per day. Truck traffic was reported to constitute only 1 % of the total traffic in every section of the corridor. FUTURE TRAFFIC Table 3 shows the projected traffic volumes for Route 116 in 2035. The growth rates used in this calculation (and shown in the table) are based on estimates provided by VDOT. If the historic growth rates remain consistent in the future, the greatest increases of traffic will occur in the southern sections of the corridor in Roanoke County. This area has a greater capacity to accommodate new growth (in terms of undeveloped land) than any other areas surrounding the studied corridor, so it is likely that this prediction will be accurate. In regards to overall traffic volume, however, the sec- tions in Roanoke City (especially between 9th St. SE and Roanoke County) are ex- pected to remain the busiest in the corridor. In addition to being available in Tables 2 and 3, current and future traffic volumes are shown on Map 1. This map identifies the approximate locations at which the counts were recorded. In addition to traffic count information, accident locations and 2005 Level of Service (LOS) data for Rt. 116 is also presented. "Level of Service" is a rating that is used to describe a road's ability to accommodate the amount and type of traffic that normally uses it. These ratings range from A (high efficiency) to F (lowest efficiency). Table 3: Future Traffic Volumes I From II Growthl IRate '['0 '2005 MDT 2035 Traffic I P~6J' ~'ctiops I -- Franklin County Line Back Creek 5,549 1.25% 7,630 Back Creek Blue Ridge Parkway 5,549 1.25% 7,630 Blue Ridge Parkway SCL Roanoke 5,627 1.25% 7,737 SCL Roanoke Riverland Road 7,668 1.0% 9,968 Mount Pleasant Road Bennington Street 7,703 1.0% 10,014 Bennington Street 9th Street 9,192 1.0% 11,950 9th Street Piedmont Street 7,806 0.25% 8,391 Riverland Road Walnut Avenue 4,466 0.25% 4,801 Piedmont Street Jefferson Street 5,579 0.25% 5,997 Source: Statewide Planning System. Virginia Transportation and Mobility Planning Division. Richmond, 2007. ... ... ~ - ~ CHAPTER 1 -TRAFFIC INFORMATION- 9 ACCIDENTS The intersection of Riverland Rd. SE (Rt. 116) and Bennington St. SE. Detailed accident data was only available for Rt. 116 within the City of Roanoke, as shown on Table 4 and Map I, which contains locations that had at least 3 accidents from 2005-2007. The intersection of Riverland Rd. and Bennington St. stands out as having a high number of accidents. It should be noted that this intersection will likely be reconstructed in 2009. A VDOT accident database containing locations with 3 or more accidents from 2004-2006, did not show any for the Roanoke County por- tion of Rt. 116. At the time of this Review, information such as the type of collision or conditions was not readily available for each of the accidents. Table 4: Accidents Accidents - - 4 4 lIntersection! 2006 Riverland Rd. & Garden City Blvd. 3 2 Riverland Rd. & Bennington S1. 6 1 Source: Statewide Planning System. Virginia Transportation and Mobil- ity Planning Division. Richmond, 2007. 10 .STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 ... ... ~ - ~ BRIDGE CONDITIONS Four bridges are located in this studied corridor of State Route 116. Basic informa- tion about these structures has been provided in Table 5. Of these four, one has been classified by VDOT as "structurally deficient" (Bridge 1087, crossing Back Creek) and two others have been classified as "functionally obsolete" (Bridge 1816, cross- ing the Roanoke River, and Bridge 1815, crossing Williamson Road and Norfolk and Southern Railroad). VDOT has provided the following explanations for these clas- sifica tions: What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered struc- turally deficient if they have been re- stricted to light vehicles, closed to traf- fic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/ or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not im- ply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. Bridges 1816 (foreground) and 1815 (background) on Rt. 116 in the City of Roanoke What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or ver- tical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. II ~ : ...~ "" I . VA Structure :NQ.. Crossin~ De,ck Stlper Sub Year -- . ., - Condi- :Cbndi'- :Corrdi~i Built 'tibn* tiQu*' {iQh~ Suffr,ci~_n~y Rating 1815 Williamson 1928 5 5 5 56.6 FO 10/1/2007 Rd, NSRR 1816 Roanoke 1900 7 7 7 79.4 FO 10/3/2006 River 1828 Gamand 1932 6 6 6 91.4 6/26/2007 Branch 1087 Back: Creek: 1961 4 5 5 47 SD 1/12/2007 Source: "Bridge and Culvert Conditions: Salem District." Virginia Department of Transportation. 2008. *Condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent) CHAPTER 1 -TRAFFIC INFORMATION- 11 Map 1- Traffic Information ~ "Il...~ .. ,I-/.. .. ..~ ......... ......... r..i" .....,... ~- ~ ~, 1 Roanol(e City "!:J. .:::;: as ..b (j c: -& J Roan,o,ke County -- /- .-d&+~~~ Ir' I~ \ J f~ o 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 - - Miles Date: May 28~ 2008 12 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 N W~E s ~ ~~ '; .#~~ l ~r ~~, / ~ -/ r :QI (~ ~r ~p-~ \ Franklin County l " '&~ Legend * Accident Locations 2005 Level of Service A B -----=- C o E Traffic VO]llmes (2005 count - 2035 forecast) 12005 - 20351 LAND U SE AND DEVELOPMENT 2 FEW FACTORS HAVE MORE INFLUENCE on a roadway than its sur- rounding land uses. They playa large role in determining the type and amount of traffic that will use the road, as well as the need for traffic safety and control measures. A residential subdivision adjacent to Rt. 116 in the community of Mt. Pleasant. located in Roanoke County The majority of the land surround- ing State Route 116 in the stud- ied corridor is currently used for single-family residential develop- ments. These properties can be found in settings ranging from the traditional urban neighborhoods in the City of Roanoke to rural residential properties in Roanoke County. A small number of com- mercial and industrial properties are intermingled between these developments. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The majority of residential development along State Route 116 is concentrated in one of two areas (see Map 2). The first is a neighborhood in South Roanoke City known as Riverland. The second is a rural community in Roanoke County known as Mt. Pleasant. Riverland is one of the oldest neighborhoods in the City of Roanoke. Recently, it was deemed eligible for classification as a historic district. Route 116 enters the neighbor- hood from the south on Riverland Rd. SEe Riverland Rd. SE is the busiest street in the neighborhood and accommodates a significant amount of through traffic in ad- dition to resident traffic. In the Riverland Neighborhood Plan, the City of Roanoke stated that it intended to maintain the residential nature of the road in the neighbor- hood. The City plans to complete continuous sidewalks on both sides of the street, maintain a consistent structural setback, and add street trees where possible. In ad- dition, they want to continue to provide and encourage on-street parking in order to narrow the width of travel lanes on Rt. 116 and, consequently, slow traffic. The second residential area is a rural community located just south of the Roanoke City limits that is known as Mount Pleasant. Some of the homes have direct drive- way access to Route 116. Most, however, have been built on surrounding streets and attain access to it by one of the four streets that intersect Route 116 in Mt. Pleasant. Although Riverland Neighborhood and Mount Pleasant host the greatest concentra- tions of residential development on the Route 116 corridor, residential properties can be found almost continuously along the entire studied corridor. Residential developments along Rt. 116, as seen in the City of Roanoke's Riverland Neighborhood (pictured left) and Roanoke County's Mount Pleasant (right) 14 .STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ... ... ~ - ~ Few commercial properties are found along the studied corridor of State Route 116. Those that can be found are concentrated in three locations (see Map 2). The first commercial area is located on Piedmont St. SE in Riverland Neighborhood. Route 116 uses this section of the road as a connection from Riverland Rd. SE to Wal- nut Ave. SEe The area has been designated as the "Village Center" of the Riverland Neighborhood. All the businesses here are small and generate little traffic. A second commercial area, and the largest along the corridor, is found at the intersection of Bennington St. SE and Route 116/Riverland Rd. SEe On the northwest corner of the intersec- tion is a medium-sized shopping cen- ter that contains a grocery store and several small businesses in a strip-mall development pattern. A larger grocery store can be found on the other side of .1 Bennington St. SEe Although its main '. .-~ t entrance is located on Bennington St. One ~f the grocery stores located near the intersection of Riverland Rd. SE (Rt. 116) and SE, all traffic coming to the store from Bennington St. SE. Mt. Pleasant, Garden City, Riverland Neighborhood, or Southeast Roanoke via 9th Street must use Route 116 to reach it. The third commercial area is found in the community of Mt. Pleasant at the intersec- tion of Valley Stream Dr. and Route 116/Jae Valley Rd. It includes a gas station and two small businesses. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Very few industrial properties are located along State Route 116 (see Map 2). Near the Roanoke County/Franklin County border, two properties have been zoned as "light manufacturing or warehouse." In the City of Roanoke, a large electric trans- former station is located along the road near the Garden City Blvd. SE intersection. A small cluster of properties next to this station are also zoned as "Industrial," but their current land use is single family housing. A large industrial park can be found near Route 116 in Roanoke City. It is located on the north side of the Roanoke River in Southeast Roanoke. The only driveways available for the park are found on 9th St. SEe Given Route 116's close proximity to those 9th St. SE access points, it is likely that it serves as one of the primary arteries for traffic traveling to and from the park. INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES The Western Virginia Water Authority has constructed facilities on the northeast corner of the intersection of State Route 116 and Bennington St. SEe It also owns two large undeveloped properties to the south of this intersection. The undeveloped properties have been zoned by the City of Roanoke as Open Space. Two fire stations are located along the studied corridor. The City of Roanoke has CHAPTER 2 -LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT- 15 a station located at the intersection of Riverland Rd. SE and Bennington St. SEe In Roanoke County, The Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue station is located on Route 116 immediately north of Valley Stream Dr. FUTURE LAND USE In the City of Roanoke, most of the land surrounding State Route 116 has already been developed. Consequently, it is unlikely that major land-use changes will occur here. Some additional housing may be added between Bennington Street SE and the Roanoke City/County border. Most of the future land development, however, is likely to occur in Roanoke County. Roanoke County recently prepared a future development plan for the community of Mt. Pleasant and its surrounding areas (referred to collectively as Mount Pleas- ant). This is one of the few areas of Roanoke County that has not been extensively developed. According to the plan, the county intends to preserve the rural character of the area as much as possible. The growth that does occur will be directed in and around the already-developed areas of Mt. Pleasant. This growth will primarily be residential (specifically, single family homes) in nature. Some commercial develop- ment may also occur, however. Two significant development projects are already in the planning or development stages in Roanoke County. The first is a golf-course community known as Balley- hack Golf Club that will be located on Pitzer Road. Vehicles traveling to Balleyhack will turn off of Route 116 at Mount Pleasant Boulevard, which eventually intersects Pitzer Road. This club is intended to be highly exclusive, so it should not generate large amounts of traffic. The property will include 75 home sites. The second proposed development is a gated subdivision known as Loblolly Mill. This subdivision, which will be located off of Sterling Road, will contain about thirty homes. Route 116 will be the nearest arterial road to both of these developments and, as a result, will most likely accommodate the majority of the traffic that travels between them and the City of Roanoke or Franklin County. A final project that should be mentioned is the proposed development of a family- style resort on the property that used to be home to Explore Park, which is bounded by the Roanoke River to the north and the Blue Ridge Parkway to the west. The park was forced to close in June 2008 due to a lack of funding. Virginia Living Histories, the development company that is currently leasing the land, has expressed interest in creating a family-based destination attraction on the site. Existing access to the property can only found on the Blue Ridge Parkway. If the park is developed more extensively, however, additional road access may be needed. Given Route 116's proximity to the property, it is possible that one of these access roads may connect to it near Mount Pleasant. 16 .STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 Map 2- Current Zoning N W~E s L o,,"-.~ ~ ~ ' . "\ \. \ ~ ...... t \ F.ra.nJ<.lin County \, rT LEG"E.N'D Zoning Districts I! Residential Plann,ed Residential Development _ Commercial ~ Downtown I J Mixed Use I nstitutiona I 0.3 0.6 ~ Industrial ~ Agriculture Date: May 27, 2008 ~ Recreation and Open Space 1.2 1.8 2.4 Miles - - ... ... ~ - ~ CHAPTER 2 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT- 17 18 .STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING 3 ON JAN UARY II 1970 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) was signed into Law. NEPA established a national environmental policy and provided a framework for environmental planning and deci- sion-making by Federal agencies. When Federal agencies are planning, funding, or issuing permits for projects, NEPA directs them to conduct environmental reviews to consider the potential impacts on the human and natural environment by their proposed actions. NEPA also estab- lished the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which is charged with the administration of NEPA. The NEPA process consists of a set of fundamental objectives that includes interagency coordination and co- operation and public participation in planning and project development decision-ma ki ng. ~~'- ~ Rt. 116 (center-striped road beginning in bottom-left corner of the picture) travels between Mill Mountain Park (top-left), the historic Riverland Neighborhood (top-right) and the Roanoke River (bottom-right). Source: Microsoft Virtual Earth. The NEP A process is now strongly embedded in the federal project development process and continues to have broad-based legislative support; however there have been concerns about its effect on the timely completion of projects. These concerns led to the signing of Executive Order 13274 in 2002 and to language in the 2005 fed- eral transportation legislation, Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), which emphasized the importance of expedited transportation project delivery while being good stewards of the en- vironment. As a result, the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) has worked with States to implement an environmental streamlining process that requires trans- portation agencies to work together with natural, cultural, and historic resource agencies to establish realistic timeframes for the environmental review of transpor- tation projects. FHW A has also encouraged transportation planning agencies (State DOT's, MPO's and RPO' s) to link planning and environmental review in order to streamline both processes. This section attempts to provide such a linkage by identifying human and natural resources that could be affected by future transportation projects along State Route 116 in Roanoke County and Roanoke City. Unless stated otherwise, an environmen- tal resource was included in this group if it was located within 500 feet of the road. This is not a comprehensive review of such resources and includes only those with which the MPO can reliably and consistently identify their location and significance. Maps 3 and 4 show the locations of many of these resources along the Rt. 116 cor- ridor. Endangered species locations and archaeological sites are not included on the maps due to the fragile nature of these resources. Specific information about any of the resources discussed in this section can be obtained by contacting the RV ARC. NON-MoTORIZED FACILITIES Walkable and bike able communities offer a high quality of life and positively impact mobility, safety, and recreational opportunities. The desire for efficient motorized travel must be balanced with community development patterns as well as the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists. Preserving a well-planned and well-maintained non- motorized system, which provides recreational opportunities and connects commu- nity activity centers, is key to overall transportation goals. r ..... Possible impacts on nonmotorized facilities should be considered during the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of transportation projects. Nonmotorized facilities are considered impacted if they are removed, if travel patterns are changed to the detriment of pedestrian/ bicyclist safety, or if existing nonmotorized pathways are bisected (e.g., by a bridge not accessible to non-vehicular traffic) thereby reducing connectivity along the pathway or between destinations. (SEMCOC) PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS Frequent pedestrian crossings occur at several places on Route 116 on the studied corridor. Many of these cross- ings are directly related to greenway or trail use, which will be discussed more extensively below. In addition to these locations, pedestrian traffic can be expected at various locations in Riverland Neighborhood, around the 20 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 shopping centers at the intersection of Bennington St. SE and Riverland Rd. SE, and in the community of Mount Pleasant. Special attention could be given in Mount Pleasant for children who might cross the road en route to Mount Pleasant Elemen- try School, which is located a short distance to the north of Route 116. GREENWAYS, TRAILS, AND BIKE PATHS Mill Mountain Greenway The Mill Mountain Greenway is a three and one-half mile long path that connects downtown Roanoke with Mill Mountain. Its route uses State Route 116 on Wal- nut Avenue between Jefferson Street and Piedmont Street. Although sidewalks are available for pedestrians in this section, bike riders must use the on-road lanes of Route 116. Roanoke River Greenway The Roanoke River Greenway includes a two and one-half mile long path that fol- lows the Roanoke River in South and Southeast Roanoke. The path passes under State Route 116 at Walnut Street Bridge 1816. This point also serves as a connection between the Roanoke River Greenway and the Mill Mountain Greenway. The greenway path, like the river, assumes a close parallel route to Route 116 be- tween Riverland Neighborhood and Bennington Street. It runs along the southern bank of the river between the river and the road. Mill Mountain Star Trail The Mill Mountain Star Trail is a natural footpath that connects Riverland Rd. SEj State Route 116 with Mill Mountain Park. A small parking lot has been constructed near Route 116 to provide access for trail us- ers. The parking lot is accessed by a short driveway that connects directly to Route 116. Roanoke Valley Horse Trail The Roanoke Valley Horse Trail is a 18.5 mile equestrian trail that runs parallel to the Blue Ridge Parkway as it passes through Roanoke County and the City of Roanoke. The trail crosses Route 116 immediately south of the parkway's overpass. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The Blue Ridge Parkway ~, The Blue Ridge Parkway passes over Rt. 116 The Blue Ridge Parkway, which is a linear park and scenic road that is owned and managed by the National Park Service, intersects State Route 116 approximately 2.1 miles north of the Franklin County line. The property surrounding Route 116 is contained in the Parkway's land for a linear distance of approximately .17 miles. An overpass was constructed for the Parkway's road at this intersection. No access ramps were constructed to allow traffic to transfer between the two roads. ... ... ~ - ~ CHAPTER 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING- 21 Mill Mountain Park Mill Mountain Park is a five-hundred acre park in the City of Roanoke that contains the land on and around Mill Mountain. State Route 116 serves as the northern bor- der of the park for over half a mile between Primrose Street and the driveway to the Mill Mountain Star Trail parking lot. OTHER OPEN SPACE A large area of undeveloped land is found to the south and west of Route 116 near its intersection with Bennington Street. It is owned by the Western Virginia Water Au- thority and has been zoned by the City of Roanoke as Recreation and Open Space. HISTORIC RESOURCES Preservation of key historic resources contributes to stronger communities, economic development and tourism, and an overall higher quality of life for citizens. Under- standing and developing a future consistent with the past is essential. The ultimate goal is integrating historic preservation into all aspects of current and future com- munity and transportation planning, so that, ultimately, there is a balance. Historic resources are generally considered to be any building, district, archeologi- cal site, structure, or object that is at least fifty years of age and is either listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Possible impacts on historic resources should be considered during the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of transportation projects. A historical resource is considered im- pacted if the resource and/ or its site features are damaged, relocated or destroyed; altered inconsistent with preservation standards; exposed to incompatible visual, atmospheric, or audible elements; or neglected. (SEMCOC) HISTORIC STRUCTURES Five structures or places that are within five-hundred feet of State Route 116 in Roa- noke County have been deemed eligible for consideration to be designated as histor- ic places. Four of these structures are homes and the fifth is a small cemetery. None have been listed on the Virginia or National Register of Historic Places. In the city of Roanoke, thirty structures or places within 500 feet of the road have been identified in historic surveys. Two of these-the Virginia Railway Passenger Station and the Southwest Historic District-are listed on both the Virginia and Na- tional Register of Historic Places. The other eligible structures include bridges, fac- tory and warehouse buildings, homes, and two neighborhood districts (Riverland and Southeast Roanoke). ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES Four identified archaeological sites are located within 250 feet of State Route 116 in the vicinity of the Roanoke River. Although their specific locations are withheld here in the interest of protecting the sites, any projects that are undertaken along the cor- ridor in this area should be prepared to properly accommodate them as necessary. ENDANGERED SPECIES The Roanoke River and Back Creek are home to an endangered fish species known 22 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 as the Roanoke Logperch. This fish has been documented many times in the sections of these water bodies immediately adjacent to the State Route 116 corridor. It should also be noted that there are several documented sightings of endangered species in both the Roanoke River and Back Creek that do not specifically identify a species (in the data that was available for this study). Although it is likely that these cases also identify Logperch, additional research should be done for any projects that are undertaken in these areas. ... ... ~ - ~ WATER RESOURCES Surface waters, including lakes and streams, are a vital component of all communi- ties - contributing to agriculture and industry, recreation and tourism, and overall quality of life-and their preservation should, therefore, be a priority. Possible im- _ _-_ pacts on water resources should be considered during the plan- ning, design, construction, and maintenance of transportation projects. Water resources are considered impacted if polluted stormwater runoff reaches riv- ers and lakes, area vegetation is removed, damage to the stream beds or banks is caused by heavy equipment, or accidental spills (e.g., paint, solvent, fuel, salt) run directly into water bodies. (SEM- coe) RIVERS AND STEAMS State Route 116 passes over two major rivers or streams in the studied corridor. Both bodies of water are classified as "Impaired" by the Virginia Department of Environ- mental Quality. Roanoke River In addition to passing over the Roanoke River on Walnut Avenue's Bridge 1816, State Route 116/Riverland Rd. SE runs parallel to it along its southern banks be- tween Riverland Neighborhood and Bennington Road SEe The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality lists the Roanoke River as a Virginia Category 5D impaired waterway because of Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments (Streams), Escheri- chia coli, and Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) in Fish Tissue. A Virginia Category 5D waterway is one in which the Water Quality Standard is not attained where Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for a pollutant(s) have been developed but one or more pollutants are still causing impairment requiring additional TMDL develop- ment. The possible sources of the listed pollutants include: Discharges from Mu- nicipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4); Drought-related Impacts; Municipal (Urbanized High Density Area); Sanitary Sewer Overflows (Collection System Fail- ures); Sediment Resuspension (Contaminated Sediment); Wastes from Pets; Wild- life Other than Waterfowl. Back Creek State Route 116 passes over Back Creek 0.7 miles after the road enters Roanoke Coun- CHAPTER 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING- 23 ty from Franklin County. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality lists the creek as a Virginia Category 5A impaired waterway because of fecal coliform levels. This listing means that the water is impaired or threatened for one or more designated uses by the pollutant and requires a TMDL (303d list). Fecal Coliform is a bacteria that originates from the following possible sources: Livestock (Grazing or Feeding Operations); Municipal (Urbanized High Density Area); Unspecified Do- mestic Waste; Wastes from Pets; Wildlife Other than Waterfowl. FLOOD PLAINS Use of the land adjacent to a stream has a major impact on protecting water quality, avoiding flood damage, maintaining fish and wildlife habitat, and accessing water- related recreation. Also known as the floodplain, this area adjacent to the stream channel serves as a natural reservoir for storing excess water during a flood. When the main stream channel cannot accommodate the level of runoff from precipitation, the spreading of floodwaters into the floodplain helps reduce the amount of damage incurred by flooding. Possible impacts to floodplains should be considered in the planning, design, con- struction, and maintenance of transportation projects. Floodplains are considered impacted if fill is added, vegetation is removed, or heavy equipment is placed in the floodplain. (SEMCOC) Three areas along the State Route 116 Corridor could potentially be impacted by 100-year floodplains. One is located in Roanoke County where the road crosses the Back Creek floodplain. The second area is located in Roanoke City between River- land Neighborhood and Bennington St. SEe In this section, the road is located imme- diately adjacent to the Roanoke River floodplain and passes through the floodplain of a small creek that runs parallel to Garden City Blvd. The third area is found on Walnut Ave. SE when the road passes through the Roanoke River floodplain on Bridges 1815 and 1816. WETLANDS Wetlands playa vital role in water resource protection, recreation, tourism, and the economy. Specifically, they provide: -Flood and storm control via hydrologic absorption and storage capacity -Wildlife habitat for breeding, nesting, feeding grounds, and cover for many forms of wildlife, specifically waterfowl (including migratory waterfowl) and rare, threat- ened, or endangered species -Protection of subsurface water resources, valuable watersheds, and recharge for groundwater supplies -Pollution treatment by serving as a biological and chemical oxidation basin -Erosion control by serving as a sedimentation area and filtering basin, absorbing silt and organic matter Wetlands are defined by Part 303, Wetlands Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994, P A451 as "land characterized by the presence of water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal 24 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 circumstances does support, wetland vegetation or aquatic life, and is commonly referred to as a bog, swamp, or marsh./I ... ... ~ - ~ Possible impacts on wetlands should be considered during the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of transportation projects. Wetlands are considered impacted if fill is added to the wetland, soil or minerals are dredged or removed from the wetland, polluted stormwater runoff enters a wetland, surface water is drained from the wetland, vegetation is removed, or heavy equipment is placed in the wetland. (SEMCOC) This corridor of Virginia Route 116 passes within 500 feet of only one wetland area that is listed on the National Wetland Inventory. This wetland consists of the river- ine area surrounding and including the Roanoke River. As with the river, Route 116 passes over the wetland on Walnut Avenues Bridge 1816 and then runs immediately south and parallel to it between Riverland Neighborhood and Bennington Road SEe CHAPTER 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING- 25 Map 4- Environmental Screenin/{: Roanoke County ". , --~ ~ N w-</- E '-'-e CitY -... l'Q~~ ~ s ~ ~--- ~ -.d~- Legend ~~ .A }J II I If l, Roanoke County ? ..t4.7.rf .~~-~, ['~~ ,J Franl{lin County @ ') /., s. R.116: 500 ft. Buffer Zone _ 100-year Floodplain _ HistoricArchitecture D Parks or Open Space - Impaired Rivers And Streams o 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1 - - Miles Date: June 19,2008 26 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 ... ... ~ N - w-\rE ~ Mav 3- Environmental Screeninz: Citv of Roanoke s t I.r;/ /i/ *1" ';.' /.fr [ ..~~" ,,~ ..,~.. ..... ':"-..,. o g /:} ~ '"")0 ffl?'"-'"-' if I ~J \\:.. ~~~ ~-~$ S. R. 116: 500 ft. Buffer Zone _ 100-year Floodplain _ Wetlands _ Historic Architecture D Parks or Open Space - Impaired Rivers And Streams - Greenways o 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1 - - Miles Date: June 19~ 2008 _..~~~'J.;;.#'~ .--=-;.~~ ;...,,:.:?... count-Y i'~' 7" e ,.:E$'-o. I 03]).0 ~ J.. <' I"- w ~r Q. '~~ [,J .~~--. 7' G.~J ~r "'::</1' Q~ ~; ~~i I't',? \> 'O~'f. ~1 .^~e -.-,.~ . fi(t.\V .~~,..' 'J",,~\ I,}e Legend CHAPTER 3 · bNVIRONMENTAL ~CREENING. 27 SOURCES City of Roanoke. RiverlandjWalnut Hill Neighborhood Plan. Retrieved May 2008 from <http:j jwww.roanokeva.govj85256A8D0062AF37jCurrentBaseLinkj N25ZDJWH095FGUREN> Microsoft Virtual Earth. Microsoft Corporation. Image retrieved July 2008 from <http:j jmaps.live.com> Roanoke County. Mount Pleasant Community Plan-Draft. Retrieved May 2008 from <http:j j eservices.roanokecountyva.gov jpcagendajpcwsj wsagendaa tt021908. pdf> SEMCOG. "Integrating Environmental Issues in the Transportation Planning Pro- cess: Guidelines for Road and Transit Agencies." The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. January 2007. Virginia. Transportation and Mobility Planning Division. Statewide Planning System. Richmond, 2007. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 2006 Impaired Waters (303D Data). Retrieved May 2008 from <http:j j gisweb.deq.virginia.gov j deqimsjviewer. htm ?SERVICE= IR2006> Virginia Department of Transportation. Bridge and Culvert Conditions: Sa- lem District. Retrieved May 2008 from <http:j jwww.virginiadot.orgjinfoj resources j 2salem_bridges_l.28.08. pdf> 28 .STATE ROUTE I 16 CORRIDOR REVIEW. JULY 2008 o AT A REGULAR MEE-rING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT -rHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2009 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEE-rING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conforrrlity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.