Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/26/1988 - RegularA P P E A R A D] C L' R E Q U E S T M PUBLIC HEARING ODI ~88 - ~ ~ ~~~9 ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE .PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available ~^'_etiier spe4k? ng as an individual or representative. TYie c'rairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and T,~ill enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of t:,e Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3 . All comr-tents must k,~ uirected to tt:e Board . Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUF SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E ~V R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N:~ME : ~ 1LZ-1~ °~ ~l'~n t ADDRL•'SS : ~~ d / ~O V~ ~~~ ~ -' v PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. .Thank you.? ~, ; ~5_" ?1 P P E A R A N C F t2 E Q U E S T 1 UBLIC H1;AkI1:G ON ~, ~,'~~, ; I; ~ ~ /~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so .,that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All. comments mast be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the au3ien;:e will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or commEnts with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEA~Z FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP S:-iALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I '.P F. L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: 5 ~~ = ._,_ ~j //l~Gt,r~?~.-, :J ADDRESS . ~7 ;,Z~ ~~~~,~~~~~j ~~~j~ . PLEASE NOTE: (After filling oat, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.? _ ~ P. P P E A P. A N C E R E Q U E S T ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PiJBLIC HEARING ON I would .like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are regLested to leavz any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~-E~ `~~~~ ADDRESS : ~~!jQ' ~~ln..~{,~~j Lti1 iU%V ~o~o~~ PHONE : 5Cv3-543 t Z- PLEASE NOTE; (After filling c..~l, ~i'„e to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and .audience members is not allowed. 4: Both speakers and th:~ audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written. statements and/or comments with the clerk. 5. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE : ~ 7Zr2~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E ~~ n A N C E R E Q U E S T T~UBLIC HEARING ON ~~ ~~ . ~~~~!~ r'~' n ~ I would. like the Chairman o~ t?~e Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the pub'_ic hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree {.o follow the guidelines listed • below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have betwee.z three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ?.. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W 12 I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ yr ~ ~ NAME : _ ~,( ~. V ~~-G<. I ~~( d j"(, ~ (~ S S ~ \, ADDRESS : ' ~,.~ d~ (~ ~_~ ~ ~ ~/' ~'~' - ~~ Vl~/ ~ _~ ~f' PHONE : ~ `-~ v ~ V` ( ~ "~ PLF,ASE NOTE. (After .Li;.:~fi_g ,. _.~ _ ~ , -:. -co the Dcp~.":.y Clerk. Thank you ) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~ ~ 0 ( tVl~.~"C,~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me durirg the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of~their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by -the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n ~ ,~? _ _ NAME: ~/>~t~'~ ~/,~f,' ~ ~ ~ ' ADDRESS . ~l ~ ~ fj~i~/'r~ ~/~; ~ o }, .G'--~~ i ~~i ~ ~ ~.~ ~~/~~ _ ....J ~•~~ % PHONE : ~~~`-~, ~~ C' ~- ;% _I>C~~~~.C G'.iG~ ~c'_~~ PLEASE '_JOTE: (After ,, Clerk. ,, h:,y.9~~-'?-' ~~~.~,a . , fill,_.y o.: ~; ,~ , ., to the Deputy Thank u . ) ~,/~:~__~<(~ ~~-~ ~' - ~ ~--~~ ~ ~~-~- / ,~' ,.~,~ , ,,~' _ ~ , c ~"~`` A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~_ PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman. of ttie Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1, Each speaker will-have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may he entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G .~.'. B _T. Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~' /. ,_ :'.` ,_ ~ ~ _._.. ~~/t~1Guc~J ADDRESS : L r - ' , • ~ i. ~.., . ~~ PHONE PLEASE NOTE.: (After filling out, give i.o the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whe ther speaking as an individual or representativ e. The chairman will decide the time limit .based on the number of citizens speaking on a n issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by th e majority of -the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Q uestions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~G~~/~ y©~C ~~~.~f ADDRESS : ~y~ ~/~-y/~G woa.~ ~ ~~~~ PHONE : S~O ~ ` f~" y~~S PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A• R A '~? ~ E ~2 ;? Q U E 5 T PUBLIC HEARING ON ',~ ~ ~~ ~ '~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. ..Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP .ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G "I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r ~ NAME : ~,~'L.., ~'~ ~ ~ ~1/l~ i ~-~ ADDRESS : ~ ~ ~ lc~ ~ ~~ C/1.., l~J ~i ~_T~ I'~ PHONE: q~~J y ~~ ~~ z~~F 772 ~ ~ 7/ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~.:/~/cic}]: ~`~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience wilt exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZE) GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM 'PHE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : /. J /~ Il ~ IJ ~~ hJ ~ ~~ ADDRESS : ~'y/ 7 ~,. D P /~ S ~ ~ ./Q Y P ,L. ~ PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After. filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~:~ . ~~ A~PP~EARA_C E ~ ,,~~: ~1 .;~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~-/ R E Q U E S T rne~z-~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to folloc~ the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or ' representative. Ttie chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: WIU!Ah1 L. ANDRFWS ll1 SUITE 300 4504 STARKEY RD. ~' ROANOKE~VA., 24014~,~ PLEASE_NOTE: iAfter filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~' ~"- / A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,~ PUBLIC HEARING ON '~ ~~:/~~%' /~~ ~ ~~ C I would like the. Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~~ ~ -~ ADDRESS: ~~ ~~ ,`~~~,>>fti,/~.~ .i.:,, ! ,,~..C ~1 ~ '1 e) , ~ f-'1 PHONE : ~ ~~ ~-~` ~ ~'~~ ?`~ j PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out,give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.> A P P E A RAN C E R E Q U E S T l ~~ ~! /~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. 4. 5. 6. NAME: P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : l ~~ ~ l ~ / PHONE: All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T L` ~~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~i°~~~~ A~,' ~ ~'=~'"~~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so .that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual o r representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on a n issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by th e majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. -'6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : C~//_ ~~~ ; , ~ y- , ; ; ~ ~ °`;~: ~, ., _. ADDRESS . %,~ ,`--~'' _~ .,%`fG~'~'~J .t=' ~ d it ~,' - ~~ ~ ~ h -~ . PHONE : ~t~ `? ~ ~ }'~~' ~'~> PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~-~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~/ NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) 4'~~-/ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~--C,~C G~ C~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~/J"Y) m~rri~~ ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) 7" A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON -_ 6~ r, 1 j.~, :: F~~~ _~~ °j - L~- I ~ .~~ _ ,4 f .>> ~, ;-~ F ~ ~ 1~~ ,., ~_ ~ °i J I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. .Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E h' R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~ r=J t,~ ,`7;,2. , r ~ -^~ ADDRESS : ~/.~/'/ S C-::_ ,:' ,,~ ~~ ..'c PHONE : ,~~ `/ `f / ~~ j C PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) T ~~ _~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON 7~'~ ~ ~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the .guidelines listed below. -WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. 'l~ne chairman wiii decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~LhC1(~I L ~ ~~ ,F~{,'I~ ADDRESS : ~ ~' ~ ~ ~oc~~ l ~'~f~~,sl~T/~ lI~ ~~ PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~- ~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~''~ v`C~, ~`~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on .the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~ T ~- V~ t)..~ ~ O Y'~~ ADDRESS : C,,~ Cs~ ~ ~ ~~`~ Y`~ ~~d 1.? ~ ~- o c1-~n r~~C_ ~, ~ ~ PHONE: ~ C~,~-, ~~ Q PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) I `~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON 7 /Z~/~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: A~ F ~ ~L D ~~ ~ `~L(~ ADDRESS : ~ ~~ ~-~~ ~C L.~ N S PHONE: `~g~- 3~D~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) O~ AOANp~,~ z ~ ov G ~ ~ a (~, rt't fi K~4 'i~'~ rt~~ rt rt 4-' ~ i~-fY' ~~Y ~~ 18 150 .~~ 88 ~ ~i SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Bcauti~ttlBeginning AGENDA APRIL 26, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. WORK SESSION (2:00 P.M. TO 3:00 P.M.) Work Session with Corps of Engineers on Roanoke River Tributaries. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Bishop William E. Brown Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. A Resolution of Congratulations to Glenvar-Salem All- Stars for winning the State AAU Basketball Championship (WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE EVENING SESSION AT 7 P.M.) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Space allocations and renovations for Social Services, Health Department and VPI Extension. 2. Request to accept a $40,000 grant allocation from the Va. Water Project, Inc. for the Hollins Project. 3. Approval of Letter of Understanding on Valleypointe Project. 4. Authorization to enter into County-State agreement for access road improvements to Valleypointe Phase I. 5. Approval of the Vehicle Utilization Policy. E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing to impose a permit fee for enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 3. Fifth Planning District Commission 4. Industrial Development Authority 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Resolution joining the League of Older American to honor the elderly in the month of May. 2 2. Acceptance of Airpoint Drive, Airpoint Road, Village Lane, Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane into the Va. Department of Transportation's Secondary System. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, The League of Older Americans, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 4. Authorization for use of the Bent Mountain Fire Station by a civic organization. 5. Approval of proposed agreement with Appalachian Power Company for July 1987 through June 1990. 6. Authorization to execute Memorandum of Agreement with Va. Department of Emergency Services. J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Statement of Investments and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 1988. L. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) . EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) M. RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATION AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the Glenvar-Salem All- stars for winning the AAU state basketball championship. N. PUBLIC HEARINGS 488-1 Public Hearing to elicit oral and written comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1988/89. 488-2 Petition of S & J Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults. located at 7120 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1988) 3 488-3 Petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to rezone a 3.56 acre tract from R-1, Residential and M-2, Industrial to B-2, Business to operate a retail garden center and to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. 488-4 Petition of the Hobart Companies, Ltd. to amend the conditions on a 4.974 acre tract located on the south side of Peters Creek Road immediately southwest of its intersection with Deer Branch Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 488-5 Petition of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. to rezone a 2.85 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to develop a complex including office building, convenience store, and donut shop, located north of the intersection of Wood Haven Road and Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 488-6 Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and hold obedience training classes on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately east of the terminus of State Route 667 in the Vinton Magisterial District. 488-7 Petition of Ernest Clark to rezone a 9.77 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhomes, located on the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately one half mile east of its intersection with Taney Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 488-8 Petition of Roger D. Hale and F. Mike Montgomery for a Use Not Provided For Permit and to rezone a 0.23 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-2, Business to operate a dog grooming business, located at 4355 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 488-9 Petition of Clarence David Shepherd to rezone a portion of a 0.739 acre tract from B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car sales business located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 488-10 Petition of Clifford Currv to amend the conditions on a 5.57 acre tract to construct a retirement facility, located on the east side of Va. Route 4 706 approximately 0.1 mile south of its intersection with Route 419 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 0. P. 4- R. 488-11 Request to amend the Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition for a 0.678 acre tract parcel located at 6024 Williamson Road. 488-12 Public Hearing concerning acquisition of certain easements for completion of the Starkey Force Main Gravity Sewer Project to traverse certain properties being owned by Tanglewood West. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition of a new Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and Beveraaes; such new article VIII imposing a tax on certain food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and providing for the amount of such tax, procedures for collection, duties of sellers and duties of local officials with respect to such tax, enforcement procedures, civil penalties for late payment, misdemeanor penalties for violations of article, exemptions, and an effective date. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of on approximately sixty-one acres of real located near Virginia State Route 603 in County. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT timber rights property Roanoke 5 +"~~., I+r~Ui'`~ I i `~~~1~:: L ii .J i".i J-~.J C~r'~J rV~L1Sr7~tt'J r~~ - ~1~~.1 i.:.i ry H tt it r1 ti N ~( l 1 7 1 `1 t= a_ c ~ 1 rtt 1' L i~ iJ J n r.UH;"vUr~L Y~ 2~tU1~ iTr;( ~F vlh~I~tiIN i,l (Y ~r rtlr+ivUnt r~FFIiJHVIT LF Puu~ii,r+l i 1 r ~ 7~ic l„v~cnJlvfL~J) kiV UF-t-ll,uri r/t~ ~ 1Mt~-rrlsitLu i,UKNur<riTlUl'tif wrll,rf L~tK- _ .. _. _ Nuhrii iuV l:i i'~~;i_t~Htk ut- r,~ KUr,~'vui\ i 1~~~a :, w,.i~Lu-vZwJt H ur~1LY fvit=vrJN.rF'tK F'uC:L1Jf~CG 1.`r KUr.tvuitt• Iiv (ric ~(NTc Ur v'lrivli`il,t U~ i:~r~i IrY Ttir~T Try i~;"viv~x~ +vUTli,t w;-i5 t'v,:LlJt;ti~ Iii Ji+lu ~Vtvti;ir'r+t'ChJ U4/LL/~~ Lvtivl~Ju L'`4/i.9/~i cVcfvli'vv ~rI(~vt~~r Tr,iS z_/i7 uHY uF NrttI~ ly~o t V ----„rr Iticr ~ J J I I~+~N TUr(`C v LEGAL NOTICE lotlee Is hereby Olven fo sll In- terested persons fhsf fha Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virplnla, will hold a public hearln0 st 7:00 p.m., of fha Rosnoke County Administrative Cen- ter, at 373! Brsmbleton Avr nue, Roanoke, VIr0lnia, on April 46, 19p, on the petition of HOP-IN FOOD STORES, INC. to rezone with certain eondltlans A 4.SS acre parcel of lend, Generally located at the northeasterly Interoeefion of peters Creek Road snd Woodhaven Drlvs wlthln the Hollins Maplstarlal District and recorded as Pareei M46.40.447 In fha Roanoke CounfY Tax Records, Dursu- ant to the provisions of the Rosnoke Gounfy Zonlnp Ordi- nance, sold pareN of land be- Inp more particularly de• scribed as follows: A 4.SS acre parcel of land, pener• ally located st the northeast- eAy Interseetlon of Peters CrNk Road snd Woodhaven Drive wlthln the Hollins Mao- . Isfsrlal District and recorded ~ as Parcel if36.40-4.47 In the Rosnoke County Tax Records A copy of fhs Zoning Ordlnsnce of Rosnoke County and amendments thereto as well as s copy of tM petition, site plan, and other documents re- lated to this reQUast msy bs ezamined In the office of the Department of Development, j locsfed In Room 600 st ; Rosnoke County Adminlstra-' five Gnfer, 3791 Brsmbleton ' Avenue, Roanoke, Virplnla. Roanoke County will Drovlde as- sistance to handicapped per- sons daslrln0 to stfend public hearings. Such Individuals are reQUested to contact the Coun• ty office of Personnel Services p03) T/4-401! If speoisl provl• dons are neessssry for atten• dance. Craven under my hsnd this 7th day of April, 19q. Mary H. Allen, Dep. Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ~; ~... ~~ ~~~~~ '`~ ~~~~~ 706 CAMPBELL AVENUE, S. W. P.O. BOX 14205 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24038 TELEPHONE (703) 345-0451 May 5, 1988 Mr. Webb Johnson 3929 Hummongbi-rd Lane 5W Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Johnson: We .are pleased to have been advised that on April 26, 1988 you were re-appointed as the Roanoke County representative to the League of Older Americans Advisory Council. We have deeply appreciated your work on behalf of the League and look forward to your continued participation. Please feel free to call on me if I can be of assistance to you. t 1'b r -. Sincerely, ZJ~'~ ,cs t ~~~ Murry K. White ' Chairman, LOA Advisory Council cc: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Danil Deane, Deputy Director for Program Operations AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING VIRGINIA'S FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON &AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT P. O. BOX 20068 MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA EDWARD A.NATT 24018-1699 MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD May 6, 1988 Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Various Rezonings Dear Sir: OFCOUNSEL PHILLIP A. SHORT 703-776-1197 Enclosed please find the Legal Notice for the following rezonings: 1. Hop-In Food Stores. 2. Ernest Clark. 3. The Hobart Companies. 4. Emmy Hinman. I would appreciate your filing these with the appropriate file. Thanking you in advance for your cooperation, I am, Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON 8 AGEE, P.C. Edward A. Natt EAN/sb Enclosures tt ~: N I~ lJ I` r_ 1 1 ~'. L J L Y l.. h~. ~.:• - J :.. Y. J ru ~V~:i°~~t+: - ~tuc 170 i rUbL:i?'it~'.':i ~Lt - :IO•ita ~ur,t+tCV r, i~~YT1 L~~Iy t:Lt,TI~ ~~ Jn KL;r;iVliC~ Vr ~4lJIt TNT"~ car. vlr:vlvir+ i, I T'Y Lr KUHP~I;t\c r`F1-iutiVlT 1. f- F'u~~Ii.r;T Ii.ii~ _ _, 1 r ~ ~F'1~: UiV:J~+~J IV1~~LU ~ F+;~ lit' Lt.~ fit`' T I'I~_i-ruKLU l,ur~Pi..i~NTlUivr v~rrlC,rt Lui~- P~hi~Tiul`d I~ i•'u:l_IJHtrc .u~ 7t-1~ KuH~Vuttt TII~itJ 4 Nll~tL~-iVt=rti51 re uriILY i~i~w:i1-';,r'tn i/Uc:LIJF±~L itv Kur{irUi~tr II'v art ;iTr+rt t.;t- vlK~~~~iY`ir i i;t~TirY Tt,i~T 1N~ ~.+'V~dEXtu IVU~ II, C: VtiMJ I''UL~~1~~1CU IIV :Jr{lli +~C"YVJYr{~'1=itJ Uljv Tt-"~ t-VLLl~rv.'Jv UriTt~;i U`t~IL~Jb LVCitiIi~l7 l1`t~ I7I C.J ~y~C=I.Y 11~v rr1T(vcJjr T7IJ curt- iJNY Ur n'r<i~ Iy~b r /JQ ~ Sri-ILt:~'~ ~ii~ivNTUnt LEGAL NOTICE Notice Is hereby Oiven fo all in- terested persona that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Counfy, VlrOinia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Cen- ter, at 3738 Brambleton Ave- . nue, Roanoke, Virginia, on AA7I1 26, 1988, on the pefition of THE HOBART COMPA- NIES, LTD. to amend the Drof- fers on a 4.974 acre parcel of Isnd, generally located in fhe j 6600 Block of the South aide of Peters Creek Road, within the Catawba Ma0iaterlal District, end recorded as a portion of Parcel #27.142-12 and a por- tion of Parcel #27.142-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Re-, cord; pursuant to fhe Drovl-, slops of the Roanoke Counfy' Zoning Ordlnanee,aald parcel' of land bein0 more particular- ly described as follows: A 4.971 scre psrcel of land, gen- arally bested in fhe 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Cataw- ba Ma0lsferlal District, and recorded ss a portion of Par- cel #27.142-12 end portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, In fhe i Roanoke County Tsx Records A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County end amendments thereto as well as a copy of fhe Detitlon, site plan, snd other documents re• Isted to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located In Room 600 at Roanoke County Adminisfro- tlve Center, 3738. Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Vir0lnle. Roanoke Counfy will provide as- alatance to handicapped per- sona deairln0 to attend public hearings. Such Individusls sre requested to contact the Coun- ty office of Personnel Services (703) 772.2018 If special provi- slona sre necessary for stten- dsnce. Given under my hand this 7th day of April, 1988. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County (17631) r: :.,riitivi\C ~ li`'~J v .~Lf~Lu-~aLiaJ r+l VU°ic~it - `tUO1u`tG I t'U~LIJt'tcnrJ t"CL - LL~1•Uv cUi'~r~t~1 r ~VNT lyl'~~Lri.(niL t<v ~r~ rtUNI'tiu~L Vra L4Ulc ~TATc ,F h+Ir<ul~vli+ :iTY Wit= iZur;ivLnr= rFt-iuHV1T ~~ rUc~il,r+T~iv T t t Tt7c U,v~'~nJ l'vIY~U) H~v i.t=Fil,La< iJ~ TII`3t~;i-wl,tCi.J ;iJrtt'urZiTIl.ief vhil;N l,iun- NuKril iu 1~ ru~Li~Nct; l;r Tn~ rcuat'~unc I1~'+~J ~ nUnLl;-+vcviJ~ N L,~ILY IVCrtiJI-'ii~'C:r ~'luLl~tl~i iiv 1'~.iiti.~Ut\t~ ilti Tnt ~T,rTt ur Vlr<~i~.I;-~, ,i.i i;ti<i IrY TrIr+1 Tn't r+~v~v~Xt _- ivU lt~t ~H~ I'uLL1JF1;`Lri Iti Jr+ili I~cr+~N;~)'tK ~.J i'ti T~ (_ f' U L L L 1'Y l l ti i7 t.J !'~ 1 '~. J UY~LL/ JO CY:: ~~~~V iy u~t/ire/c3~ ~'v~ivl~.,.~ ~viTl~":~5, Tr-'. CUTn i~nY ur r1NKL lyu '~---- - ~/ • Uf't'1LCi< ~ J Ui11'i lJttL LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby Olven to all In- terested persona Thst the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, VIr0lnla, will hold a Publle hearin0 at . 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Cen- ter, at 3738 Brambleton Ave- ~ nue, Roanoke, Vir0lnia, on i April 26, 1988, on the petition of ERNEST CLARK To rezone with certain conditions a 9.77 acre parcel of land, generally located on the South Slde of~ Wood Haven Road west of 1- 581, within the Hollins Magls- ~ terial District end recorded as ~ Psrcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Psrcel ' No. 37.05-1-4 in the Roanoke County Tax Records, Dursu- ant to the Drovlsions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordl- i nance, sold parcel of land be- In0 more Derticularly de- scribed as follows: i ~ A 9.77 acre parcel of Isnd, gene~- slly located on the South Slde of Wood Haven Road west of 1-581, within the Hollins Mapis- tepal District end recorded as Parcel #71.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.OS1-2 In the Roanoke County Tsx Records A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendrtents thereto as well ~ es a cosy of the petition, sits j plan, and other documents re-, laced N this request may be 'i examhed in the office of the Deparment of Development, i locatd in Room 600 at Roaroke County Administra- tive enter, 3738 Brambleton Avelue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roan4ce County will provide as- sislnce to hsndtcapped Per- soa desiring }o attend public hdrings. Such indlvldusls ere rAueated to contact the Coun- t office of Personnel Services /03) 772-2018 if special Provl- r,lons ere necessary for atten- dance. riven under my hand this 7th day of April, 1988. Mery H. Allen, i Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors of ~ Roanoke County j (18427) r~4rii`:~h~ iii`"'cLa c. st;;~~I_i~ .._rcJ NU +vUh"L'LK - 4U~ 17C 1C ru:Ll~rlcn'S rct - yl~~.lc LlJitil+rCv r ivNTt 171y i=Li=C,iKii; 1-iu Sn ~UHiun4 Vn ~4Ui ;i(~t'c uF viK~l~tiir< 1, I f Y lr hUt+i`vuitC rt-Fli/r-~vT i.r ~u~:t_1LHTIUi'v i f (Thc UrvLtnS~(rtu 1 r, ;v .t-rlC~r< uF T 1'IcJ-nl!{L(, ~,ut{r'iiKiT IUvf r+till.r' l.lh- r'Ui-:t~l' iu(~ 1J r'~.LL1Pubi Ur- tti~ rtl,N~vUit I,~~=S ~. r+l;r~Lu-J~~~• r+ iN1LY ty~w;iF'rwt'iii F'U~Li~t~tu Ii i~:iHlrt;tttr 1i`. Tit J3NT~ ut- Vle~v1i~Iri} .l.l Lf"i~T1t-Y ltiriT Th'l~ Hlvd~Xt=u ~tiuTll,i: wt+:> t'~,~JLIJNCU l~v JMiV VtttiJ~'1it~Ct~J u~r Tr-:, :: f-uLLurrl'vu l.~Stt u4/1~/its cVCIVIiVi~ ~4/lylb~ CvLivi`~., rviT~~~~. in ~uTr: JriY Ui- ~i~-niL ly:.~o ut-1'li,CK I J Jiv'r!~ i 1. t LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby Olven to all In- terested persons fhsf the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hsarln0 of 7:00 D. m., sf fM Roanoke County Administrstlve Cen- ter, at 3738 Bramblaton Avr nue, Roenoka, Vlrpinls, on April 26, 1988, on the petition of M. E. HINMAN and DO- MINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS to rezone with certsin conditions a 3.56 sere psreel of land, Oenerelly lo- esfed on the north side of i Route 601, east of Tinker ~ Creek within the Hollins Ms0• Isfsrisl District and recorded es part of Parcel No. 38.16.1-3.1 In the Rosnoks County Tax Records, purwsnf to the prr visions et the Roanoke County ZonlnO Ordinance, sold perul of lend ba1n0 more particulsr- ly described a: follows: A 3.56 acre psresl of land, Oener- ally locstsd on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Ma0- iaterlel District and recorded as part of Parcel No. 38.16.1-3.1 In the Roanoke County Tax Records A copy of the ZonlnO Ordinsnee ~, of Reanoks County sad amendments thereto ss well sa a copy of the peflfbn, site plan, end other documents rr laced to this request may be examined In the office of the Depsrfinent of Devsbpment, located in Room 600 at Roanoke CounMy Administra- ttve Center, 3738 Bramblafon Avanw, Roanoke, VlrOinia. Roasxika CowMy will Bravtla ar atalatlu t• kandlaBgad /K- f seas Iaelrln8 to atMN rNlk Martnp. Bueh Indwlsuals era ragWatad to COMaCf tlla GOYM ty ottla of ParNnnal grvlps (7N) 77>a2pp If Nadal provl- slons an necessary }or sffen- danu. Glean under my hand this 7th day of April, 19p. Mery H. Allan, Deputy Clerk Board of Suparvison of RoanokaCounty (15214) O~ FiOANp,~.~ ~:~~ ~. .~ Z ~ 2 J a si•` 18 150 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Begir:ning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE May 9, 1988 Prentiss A. Webb, President League of Older Americans P. 0. Box 14205 Roanoke, Va. 24038 Dear Mr. Webb: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 42688-4.a concerning support for the League of Older Americans. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on April 26, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, `.7~-z-~--~1-mss/ • ~:~_~_-~.~~~1 Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment C~nunt~ of ~n~tnu~~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004 of ~ ~~,~~.~~i -A _~tw . 706 CAMPBELL AVENUE, S. W. P.O. BOX 14205 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24038 TELEPHONE (703) 345-0451 April 7, 1988 Mr. Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Garrett: As in years past, May 1988 has been designated Older Americans Month. This is a period of time when the nation unites in words and actions to honor our older citizens. The League of Older Americans, Inc. (LOA) will be joining other agencies to demonstrate in various ways its continuing commitment to the elderly of this County. We feel that it is especially appropriate for you and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to urge our citizens to honor the older members of our society during the month of May. As always, your courtesy and support are greatly appreciated and help make it possible for us to function as advocates for the elderly. Sincerely, ~~ -~/~~ Prenti~A. Webb President lwt cc: Matthew Banks, LOA Board of Directors Murry White, Chairman, LOA Advisory Council Webb Johnson, LOA Advisory Council William Poe, LOA Advisory Council Myra Sellers, LOA Advisory Council William Hammond, LOA Advisory Council Cecil Kincer, LOA Advisory Council Linda French, LOA Advisory Council Encls.: Sample Resolution AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING VIRGINIA'S FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT REj[il 41T IO('a WHEREAS, The rapid graying of our population is a cause for- genuine concern for governments at every level; and WHEREAS, This segment of our populace symbolizes for all of us a lifetime body of work and contributions from which our community wi 1 1 coat it-rue to benefit ; acid WHEREAS, It is appropriate that a time be set aside during which we acknowledge the efforts of those who have given so much and earned for themselves a dignified and honored position in our society; and WHEREAS, The month of May has been set aside as Older Americans' Month to focus the nation's attention on the accomplishments and the plight of our- older citizens; and WHEREAS, The League of Older Americans represents the over 13,000 elderly people of the County of Roanoke; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisor-s of the County of Roanoke in meeting as~.~embled, loins the League of Older Americans in urging all. citizens to demonstrate their regard far our elderly during May, and to give special consideration to the very old and the frail and needy. 71U IVI~~"YUtf\ - `tl~c~~J ja~C~ I-u~LiSri~K', r~~ - ~y7.~d nUrrvut\~ l.vuvT Y ~unKi: i., t- Jl,NtrtViJUtnJ 7.3d c;~~°'1cL'c 1 Jay J)v N L 4u~ L'~uvJ ri~,~,iViKL' Y'+i ~`tvL'i ~Tr{Tc uF- Vlnul~ylr, ~ 1 f Y 1. t= i~ C ;~, ~ ~ u ;v 1 w t Try ~~vuti.Jlvivtt) ,,,v Ui=t-i,Ert ~~- T1hicJ-~vVKLu i.i.;KPui:,rl~+vr nnlt,t-i t.u~~- Ni.Kr+1 u~°~ 1~ r't;cLl;i:-ir L:F Tnt r<Ur+iiut~L Tl~i~~ ~ ~utv~~-~v`i~Jw ~, i:H1~Y rvtrr~t'Nt'ttl rU~i_I~F,e~ it n~;~fvu,~tw li'v Tr,t ~Ti~,T~ r V1hulPv:lhw lLl; ~,tri,ti~Y fhr~7 1f-,~ rl.v.rt/:~V iV~11~,:_ nhJ E'L'.%L1.~t'1CU iiv Ji-+1L iJCrtiJf'r~NC;iJ _~_ U r T ~'. C f" lJ L L li iY 1 i r v lJ F1 ~ t :~ PUBLIC. NOTICE be advised that the Please Board of Supervlaors of oke County, at Its meet- ,~ v it '~ ~ ~ rv V 4 i i L/ v b ~ Rosn Inp on ADrll 46, 1988, et the ke County Adminlstra- v 4/ l y I it <) i°! u K~ ~ 1 i'v J Roano tlon Csnter, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Vlrplnia, st nln0 session beplnnln0 ~v 1 1 ~~ ~ L J :~ w T r"~ i J L 1 1-1 ~ h+ Y i.i r N~ K 1 L 1 47 ti ~ the eve he~rlnp on the followln0 malt- , / 1/// _,_ * ~ ter, to-wit: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1-438 <e) OF THE 1950 15 - ,~` -; - - - - _ - - - . CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS rr I 1, c n'> ~ 1 ~ v r+ T~ t. AMENDED, CONCERNING ACQUISITION BY ROANOKE MENTS FOR COMPLETION OF THE STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER PROJECT THE SAME TO TRAVERSE CERTAIN PROP- E - CAVE SPRING MAGISTERI AL DISTRICT OF ROANOKE CQUNTY BEING OWNED BY T/MGLEWOOD WEST, A V IR- GINIA PARTNERSHIP; SMITHEY 8. BOYNTON, P.C.; R. LESLIE; AND ANDREWS T . . PROPERTIES; THE ATALAN- CORPORATION; ROBERT C. BELL AND ANNE H. BELL; EMMA S. CUNNINGHAM AND EARL S. CUNNINGHAM; DARRELL W. MCCALL; AND MOHAMMED A. TAHER AND GINA S. TAHER. Al i b f e forth set e;tad n mstfer the above may appesr end be heard st the time and place sforesald. Psul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Rosnoke County, Virplnla U836) -.. .rte `U~`i::~i~ ~• '~. ,, » e'~. ;~ ~ T l r~ ~ .~ t i:v-tK'r ~ - a>i~.~U {•-L:: r.,~rt;w~t~c L..LivTY ~;~~r+nU ~r a~t'ti:v I un Y iv r~Ln ~`~i;vli r~~.N~v 1. ~'~- Vr+ ~4U1L1 ~TWT~ U~- Vi:K~iiviH i- F" i ti .-1 "~ 1 ~ ~. F' t~ U L` it i ~, J+ T 1 1_i tai i, {Tt,r ,I iv~~CnJlVI'vCIJ) x~u UI'~-ICtn UI- Tli°~~J-~i-hLu ~,~,~~.rU~;r~TTJv, r~nlirn t,J~- t'U^.HI i~~ lJ i'~J~:L1Jh~h Ut- Ttit 'ZU/1tii.Jl~t_ TIr~',cj i, r~it<iu-:v~v~~, N uriLY I~~ri~F'Hf L'K t'UGL i~rr~ lt~ r.~~l'dU~c, iii Ti-it ;J CM1 c lir vli~vid'vir, L'~ l,E4TIFY ftHT Tt-IC i;i~t'el=l~tiJ ~VIJI It;c ~;ti:i ('+.icLlSnti i..ti .Jr;Iu ~vtvrJt'xi''~k~ uy l r-I~ F'Lit_Li~r.i'vi~ L-N1 c:i U~r~ly/F}C. t`1~rilri~av t, `t/ l~~ots t_ V ~IriidU rr i1 .v~ J:;, Tr I,~s" ~u (t-~ liN`( 11 t- r~t't{~ i`i~c .1f1 1 ------------~-~=µ''r'-- -- irFi.Lr:' ~ Simi+~Turc !v l.. i~ Lv - ~~v ;_ l~ .J COUNTY OF ROANVRc PUBLIC SCAL YEAR BUDGET988.89 The County of Roanoke will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereaftel 26, the matter may be heardRoomuofthe Roanoke 1988, in the Community County Administration Center, 3738 Bramble- ton Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. The pur- pose of this hearing is to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1988- 89 summarized below. rou s senior citi- All interested citizens, g p ~ • zens and organizations representing the in- terest of senior citizens are encouraged to attend and to submit comments. SUM19~ 89 BUDGETSED COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUES Amount re General Fund: Taxes..... $37,237,302 General Property Other Local Taxes .......... 11,840,602 Permits, Fees, and Licenses . • • • • ~ 62,000 Fines and Forfeitures .. • • • • • • .150,509 Charges for Services ... • • • • • ' 286,579 Miscellaneous .............. Recovered Costs ............. 210,000 Commonwealth ............. 6,944,484 ~~ Non-Revenue ................ 576,538 Beginning Balance.......... 5_ 0.000 $58,297,296 '~ Debt Service Fund ..............5,359,292 318,716 Youth Haven II ................. . Internal Service Fund ........... 1,009,074 ` Capital Projects Fund .. • • • • • • • :: '~ g~ 2,382 Utility Fund ............. • • • • 248,750 Garage Fund .................. . Fee Classes-Recreation ..... • • 55,282,930 School Operating Fund. • • • • • • ' • 1,125,000 School Bus Fund .... • • • • • • ' ' ' 2,564,812 Cafeteria Fund ............. . Federal Programs Fund ......... 1,151,011 School Capital Improvements Fund •2,981,OOo Literary Loan Fund ....... • • • • 425,63 Textbook Fund ............... . Regional Special Education Fund • • ' 634 87~ Gross Budget............ $138, Less: Interfund Transfers .... (32 743_464 Net Budget .............. $105_ 99_ 1.4~~ EXPEL RES Amoun Source General Fund: ent Administration? General Governm 001 635 Constitutional Officers .. , .. • • • • 905 166 Judicial Administration .. • , . • • • • ' :: 2 439,275 Management Services .. , .. • • • • 2,442,706 Public Safety . •ol {ea- -S'LSL'3.OL ss 4'•DAIB 'Y06,•069 Jo 6LBY-f9S II°~ a~yaAa;a~ Oulnaal a~ua41 QO'SIY !d 1b111S S31nb rM•N roeoa aA07 ;o uoll paJadeJd saxaJ.Ily s~all~ zel IIV uollua4ld -~asJe;ul ayl woJ; AIJay;nos ;aa; OE•9L¢ 6uleq ;ulod plat a s pl "M'N '•P^Ig auaAa;a~;o AIJa;easy;nos ay; uo;ulod a;e 01: sa~was fiuldaa~~oo8'xel oaluuloaq eluleJln 'a~auaaa ~ ay; ul A;JadoJd A ;I ;o :sa paglJas BL09-6Bf 118 'Da~uolJa0x3 -saoln -Jot Oulueal~osnoy ejoldwo~ II IIaWf IIIM a4n04 JnOA a 81 ' + p i;JadOJd u011~nM ,aUDIY 1 0 I 840J 0 Aua '!ae 8U ;~a AYW WOyM;0 S~-~ Wales O eil~S "Jp uJngaaJ90E,1 HM - snJl a+n;I;sgnS Peu6lsJapun 1 A aU 0 JO 4YM ay{ 'Qp'000'4fs II I 1 S1tl3O Y Sl33 y~lyM uaol a 6ulJnaes '9Lll y~qp-Eqg sa~InJOS Ieuolsse;oJd N1801(11/9NIdtl3b aEad'essl ~oa>3 Paso ul'eluld ouaoa ;o MIS '1Jno~ 'a~ 9 •uvAJ9 Joi ~sa'awllAUaLELO-L9f Ilan •saOiJO l -JIA llmJl~ 'aol;;O s,>fJal~ a4l ul PePJO~aJ 'LB6l 'Of AJtnuaf . _-•--- ..--.- •^^-^..."-. .. pmvuns>eu w,n.. n., ., a eee .n -- O~ ROANp,~.~ z. .~ ov a? 1$ E5~ $$ ~ SFSQUICENTENN~PV A BtautifttiBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Gerald Curtiss 2826 Embassy Drive, NW Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Mr. Curtiss: May 2, 1988 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on April 26, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board for a two-year term. Your term will expire on March 22, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. Michael J. Lazzuri Director of Court Services C~n~tn~~ of ~ottnuk~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ~OANps.~ ti '~ ~ Z °v ao~ 18 rE5u B$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A BcautifulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Roger Smith Route 1, Box 186 Catawba, Virginia 24070 Dear Mr. Smith: May 2, 1988 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON ' HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on April 26, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board for a two-year term. Your term will expire on March 22, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of. the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, yy~a~~ ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. Michael Director of C~n~tn~~ of ~nttnnkP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. Lazzuri Court Services P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 O~ ROANp,~.~ ~ 'A A ~. ~J aZ 18 ~~ 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Bcauti~u/Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~nixn#~ of ~nttnn~.e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS May 2, 1988 Mrs. Alice Gillespie 5513-Daytona Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mrs. Gillespie: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on April 26, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission to complete the unexpired three-year term of William Pyles. This term will expire June 30, 1989. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 o~ POANp,~.~ z~ ~~. ~ 2 ov a~ is ~~~ $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~~ v~ ~nttnnke Mr. Webb Johnson 3929 Hummingbird Lane, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Johnson: May 2, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors-have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the League of Older Americans. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on April 26, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of League of Older Americans for a one-year term. Your term will expire on March 31, 1989. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~fY~a~.-c~~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Executive Director League of Older Americans 706 Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24009 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004 OF ROANp~~ z G~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ o a ~+' 1$ E50 8$ SFSQbICENTENN~P~ ABeauti/ulBeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 2 ~ 19 8 8 HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. William Pyles 6807 Tinkerdale Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Pyles: The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772 ?_004 O N QU, ~ u., O w H Q ~ w ~ Q ~ O ~ z p Q ~ Z ~ : ~ z w~" O ~~ ~ ~'~'_ - o U U w x w Z' u O ~w w ~ N.` ~ w O; ` Q '-' ~ w~ Q H H ,-~ • w Z a z~ O w Q ~ O Q a Q cW ~ _ ~'0 ~ ~-`~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ cn ~: ~ ;w x }' N ~+ ~ Z w cn ~ ~ z p.,~ w a 0 ~ E-' "' v w U ~ w w U ~ ~ x u z H ~ ~ ~ Q cn O w O ° z a O u OF ROANp~.~ ~ '~ p Z ~ 2 v a E50 $8 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ulBe~inning C~nixn~~ of ~v~tnnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Aril 27, 1988 ELMER C. HODGE P Bishop William E. Brown Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 3850 Harborwood Road Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Bishop Brown: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT E308 L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, April 26, 1988, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. Very r yours, L Le Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh P.O. BOX 29800 ROAN OK E. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 t 0~ ROANpk~ ti 'M p of a ~'~ ~~ ' 4~ ~ i~ ~~~~~ i p ~~ 18 ruxa ~~ ~i 4 V ~ _ SFSQUiceNTeNN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Beautiful8eginning ACTION AGENDA APRIL 26, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. WORK SESSION (2:00 P.M. TO 3:00 P.M.) Work Session with Corps of Engineers on Roanoke River Tributaries. POSTPONED - TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR 5/24/88. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Bishop William E. Brown Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. ECH REQUESTED. THAT ITEM D-3 BE DEFERRED TO 5/10/88 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. A Resolution of Congratulations to Glenvar-Salem All- Stars for winning the State AAU Basketball Championship (WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE EVENING SESSION AT 7 P.M.) D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Space allocations and renovations for Social Services, Health Department and VPI Extension. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE - URC ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT ON OVERALL COUNTY SPACE NEEDS ON 5/24/88 2. Request to accept a $40,000 grant allocation from the Va. Water Project, Inc. for the Hollins Project. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 3. Approval of Letter of Understanding on Valleypointe Project. DEFERRED TO 5/10/88 4. Authorization to enter into County-State agreement for access road improvements to Valleypointe Phase I. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE AYES - BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM STAFF TO SEND LETTERS OF APPRECIATION TO STEVE MUSSELWHITE AND DEL. CRANWELL FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE. 5. Approval of the Vehicle Utilization Policy. CONTINUED TO 5/24/88 TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL CHANGES AND STUDY REQUESTED BY B OF S. E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION WITH CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON ROANOKE RIVER TRIBUTARIES TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR 3 P.M. 5/24/88 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing to impose a permit fee for enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. SET FOR 5/24/88 G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 3. Fifth Planning District Commission SAM NOMINATED JOHN HUBBARD TO SERVE TIM GUBALA UNEXPIRED TERM. 2 4. Industrial Development Authority HCN NOMINATED WILLIAM TRIPLETT TO ANOTHER 4-YEAR TERM. 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission RR NOMINATED VINCE JOYCE TO LEONARD WINGER'S UNEXPIRED TERM. SAM NOMINATED ROGER SMITH TO MICHAEL LAZZURI'S UNEXPIRED TERM. 6. Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors HCN NOMINATED ELIZABETH STOKES AND CABELL BRAND TO ANOTHER TERM. H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS JOHNSON: REQUESTED AN UPDATE ON STUDY OF THE WELLNESS PROGRAM. KEITH COOK UPDATED BOARD ON PROGRESS. ROBERS: ANNOUNCED HE HAD MET WITH TIM GUBALA AND ECH TO DISCUSS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. ALSO ANNOUNCED ENGINEERING STUDY GROUP WAS MEETING FOR A 2ND TIME. MCGRAW: REPORTED ON THE ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE MEETING. I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. LG REQUESTED THAT ITEM I-2 BE DELETED FOR A SEPARATE VOTE. HCN/LG TO APPROVE RESO WITH DELETING ITEM I-2 - UW 1. Resolution joining the League of Older American to honor the elderly in the month of May. 2. Acceptance of Airpoint Drive, Airpoint Road, Village Lane, Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane into the Va. Department of Transportation's Secondary System. HCN/LG TO APPROVE AFTER AMENDING RESO CONCERNING AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD - UVV 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, The League of Older Americans, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 3 4. Authorization for use of the Bent Mountain Fire Station by a civic organization. 5. Approval of proposed agreement with Appalachian Power Company for July 1987 through June 1990. 6. Authorization to execute Memorandum of Agreement with Va. Department of Emergency Services. J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Statement of Investments and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 1988. BLJ/HCN TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW L. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (1) PERSONNEL, (2) REAL ESTATE BLJ/HCN - URC AT 4:05 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) M. RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATION AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the Glenvar-Salem All- stars for winning the AAU state basketball championship. RR/BLJ TO APPROVE RESO UVV N. PUBLIC HEARINGS 488-1A Public Hearing to elicit oral and written comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1988/89. 21 CITIZENS SPOKE 488-2A Petition of S & J Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults located at 7120 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1988) BLJ/HCN TO DENY PETITION 4 AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM 488-3A Petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to rezone a 3.56 acre tract from R-1, Residential and M-2, Industrial to B-2, Business to operate a retail garden center and to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE REZONING AMENDMENT OF LAND USE PLAN WILL BE BROUGHT BACK ON 5/24 URC 488-4A Petition of the Hobart Companies, Ltd. to amend the conditions on a 4.974 acre tract located on the south side of Peters Creek Road immediately southwest of its intersection with Deer Branch Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 488-5A Petition of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. to rezone a 2.85 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to develop a complex including office building, convenience store, and donut shop, located north of the intersection of Wood Haven Road and Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. NO ACTION TAKEN PETITION DEFEATED BUT PETITION CAN BE SUBMITTED AGAIN 488-6A Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and hold obedience training classes on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately east of the terminus of State Route 667 in the Vinton Magisterial District. HCN/BLJ TO DENY AYES-HCN, BLJ, RR NAYS-LG,SAM 488-7A Petition of Ernest Clark to rezone a 9.77 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhomes, located on the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately one half mile east 5 of its intersection with Taney Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS URC 488-8A Petition of Roger D Hale and F. Mike Montcxomerv for a Use Not Provided For Permit and to rezone a 0.23 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-2, Business to operate a dog grooming business, located at 4355 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. HCN/RR TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS URC 488-9A Petition of Clarence David Shepherd to rezone a portion of a 0.739 acre tract from B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car sales business located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/LG TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS URC 488-10A Petition of Clifford Curry to amend the conditions on a 5.57 acre tract to construct a retirement facility, located on the east side of Va. Route 706 approximately 0.1 mile south of its intersection with Route 419 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. HCN/RR TO APPROVE URC 488-11A Request to amend the Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition for a 0.678 acre tract parcel located at 6024 Williamson Road. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 488-12A Public Hearing concerning acquisition of certain easements for completion of the Starkey Force Main Gravity Sewer Project to traverse certain properties being owned by Tanglewood West. HCN/BLJ TO ADOPT RESO AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG NO-SAM 0. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 6 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition of a new Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and Beveraaes; such new article VIII imposing a tax on certain food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and providing for the amount of such tax, procedures for collection, duties of sellers and duties of local officials with respect to such tax, enforcement procedures, civil penalties for late payment, misdemeanor penalties for violations of article, exemptions, and an effective date. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 5/10/88 P. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of timber rights on approximately sixty-one acres of real property located near Virginia State Route 603 in Roanoke County. SAM/HCN TO APPROVE ORDINANCE URC Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE R. ADJOURNMENT BLJ/SAM AT 11:15 P.M. -UVV 7 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session: Roanoke River Tributaries Flood Control Study Corps of Engineers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1985, Roanoke County along with the other local governments requested the Corps of Engineers to study the tributary streams of the Roanoke River to determine what flood control measures could be taken to reduce the effects of local floods. The Corps of Engineers agreed to study 18 streams in the Valley of which 5 were requested by Roanoke County. Representatives from the Corps of Engineers will discuss the status of their work on the streams located in Roanoke County and the preliminary finding of any work completed. Attached is a letter to the Corps of Engineers identifying the general information of concern. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~. o n R. Hub ar , .E. E mer C. Ho ge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator Community Services & Development ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers O~ POAkp~~ ~ r ~. ~ z J a i8 .'~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A (3~nuriru/(3t~innin~ JOHN R I1UO~AR O. P.E. ASSISTnNT COVN TV AOMIN IS TNATOR C~~~tn~~ a~ ~v~trt~~n March ~ .~ , 1 9 H 8 PUOLIC FACILITIES Ms. Carroll S. Axford, P.E. Civil Engineer U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402 Subject: Roanoke River Tributary Streams Study Dear Carroll: Thank you for agreeing to assist in briefing the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on the tributary streams stud y being conducted by the Corps of Engineers. I have scheduled the brief- ing for the April 26 meeting starting at 3:00 p.m. The Board has expressed interest in the following areas: z:po - Overall tributaries - Work completed to date ° Preliminary findings - ° Future phases-of work and schedule _ - ° Explanation of County's commitments to future.phases - Carvins. Creek- - ° Work completed to date - ° Findings and alternatives ° Preliminary cost estimates - ° Corps of Engineers' participation ° Roanoke County's options The County staff will be glad to provide whatever support you may need. Please lc~t me know if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, John i2. Hubbard, P.E. Assi.~~ant County Administrator Community Services and Development JRH:wr P.O. SOX 29800 - ROAiVOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 ~ (7031 772-2071 K~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARp OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON.TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 85-222 AUTHORIZING FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION STUDIES BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has suffered severe damages from past and recent floods along several Roanoke River tributaries; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors remains very concerned with past, and the possibility of future, flood damages along these areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby authorize the County Administrator to request the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to initiate and complete the necessary Flood Damage Reduction Studies authorized under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, and/or the Roanoke River Basin Authority on the following Roanoke River tributaries as prioritized: 1. .Tinker Creek 2. Mason Creek 3. Peters Creek 4. Mud Lick Creek 5. Back Creek On motion of Supervisor Nickens and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Nickens, Burton, and McGraw NAYS : None ABSENT: Supervisor Minter ~- C „_ .. ACTION #}~''- 42688-1 ITEM NUMBER ~ "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April l6, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of the Space Needs for the Departments of Health, Social Services and VPI Extension rnrrNTV AnMTNTSTRATnR'S COMMENTS: ~,~ .~-~ ~ ~~ ~~.~ ~ BACKGROUND: -' .~~ ~~.~ ~~ ~~ ~~. ~ ,n.( ~~~ -, ~~~ ~ . ~ The Departments of Health, Social Services and VPI Extension, are currently occupying rented space within the City of Salem, and decisions must be made within the next few weeks as to an appropriate course of action in the renegotiation of leases for continued rental facilities, the potential renovation to County owned facilities, and on the allocation of space to be used by the VPI Extension, whose current lease arrangement with Roanoke College will expire on May 1, 1990. Under the terms and conditions of the services contract between the County of Roanoke and the City of Salem, the Social Services Department and VPI Extension provide services to both localities and the City of Salem shares in the local cost on a per capita basis for VPI Extension Services, and on a case load basis for Social Services Department activities. The Health Department serves the entire Alleghany Region and its costs are attributed to each locality, with the State assuming 55~ and the local share being 45~. In August 1985, the Facilities Utilization Committee suggested to the Board of Supervisors that money be included in the 1985 Bond Referendum to assist in the renovation costs of the old William Byrd Junior High School for the potential relocation of the School Administrative offices to that facility and also to include monies for the renovation of the existing School Administration building to potentially house the Departments of Health and Social Services. Monies were included in the referendum and subsequent bond sale in 1986 and there remains today $838,561 in the account to renovate the William Byrd facility and $145,776 in the account to renovate the existing School Administration building. It appears at this time that the new William Byrd Junior High School will be able to open for school services in the fall ~-/ 1988 session and that the School Administration could attempt to renovate the old William Byrd Junior High School facility for its reuse as an office complex. School administration has obtained costs of renovating this facility from their architects and the estimate is currently $4 to $4.5 million dollars. Considering the lead time of six to nine months minimum to complete these renovations, it would be the summer of 1989 before any renovation could occur to the existing School Administration building to benefit the County Departments of Health, Social Services and VPI Extension. The attached information sheets outline the space requirements of the County departments and consider the following: allocation of the current rental costs based upon existing leases, renovation of the existing School Administration building and old Health/Welfare building, and the possibility of constructing a new facility. These alternatives are discussed below: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Option #1 - This option considers the minor renovation of the existing School Administration building and old Health/Welfare building, including the installation of a new HVAC system, providing window treatments to the School Administration building and the reuse of existing interior space with only minor modifications similar to the remodeling efforts at Southview. The cost for this type of renovation has been estimated at $20 per sq, ft. for a total cost of $708,760. Under any renovation scenario, the State would share in the renovation cost of Health Department facilities in the principal only, evenly divided over a 15 year period. The State would also share in the prorata cost for the Department of Social Services and would pay on principal and interest, evenly divided over a 25 year period. In the case of VPI Extension, there is no direct assistance available from the State. The anticipated cost distribution on an annualized basis has been illustrated on the attached worksheet. Option #2 - This option considers the major renovations of the existing School Administration building and old Health/ Welfare building and would provide major alterations to the internal partitioning to allow for the maximum utilization of the interior spaces. The cost of this type of renovation has been estimated at $42 per sq, ft, for a total cost of $1,488,400. The cost distributions are demonstrated on the attached worksheet. Option #3 - This option considers the construction of a new facility of comparable size to the existing buildings at an estimated cost of $65.00 per sq. ft., which would include many of the modern environmental controls to assist in reducing operating costs. The estimated cost of this -! process would be $1,950,000. It should also be noted that the existing two properties located in the City of Salem could potentially be sold at an estimated $734,000, if an appropriate buyer could be located. Option #4 - Consideration has also been given to the continued use of leased facilities assuming an average lease value of $9 per sq. ft. with an annual cost of $211,500. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the exercise of option #4 to continue the renting of facilities for the departments of Health, Social Services, and VPI Extension. This would involve the extension of the existing lease until February 20, 1990 for the Department of Social Services, working with the State for a new lease agreement for the Health Department, and the continued useof the old Courthouse facility for the VPI Extension office. In light of the recommendation of the Blue Ribbon Commission report, staff suggests that the existing County-owned facilities be evaluated for appropriate use or disposal and a master plan be developed for all departments including the school administration. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, A ~~~J ohn M. Chambli s, Jr Elmer C. Hod e Assistant Administrator County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs Steven A. McGraw, Option 4 Garrett x Mr. Hodge will ring back reportJohnson x on space needs at second meetincrlcGraw x in May, Nickens x Robers x JMC/cw Attachments cc: File John Chambliss Betty Lucas Lowell Goble Dr. Hagan ~•4-11-~t8 SPACE REQUIREMENTS FACT SHEET Current Lease information Square Annual Lease Department Footage Rent Expiration Health 5,500 $42,000 10-1-88 Social Services 13,687 96,250 8-31-88 VPI Ext. 2,085 -0- 5-1-90 Space Needs Department Health Social Services VPI Ext. 5,500 13,687 2,085 21,272 Renewal Expiration None 2-28-90 None Needed Sq. Ft. 7,000 14,000 2,500 23,500 Available Space in the Existing School Administration Building And Old Health and Welfare Building (Net) School Administration Building Old Health/Welfare Building Projected Annual Administration Buil Electricity $ 29,000 Heat 16,700 Janitorial 18,000 Maintenance Allocation 35,400 Insurance 1,500 Utilities 1,200 $101,800 Estimated Market Value of (2) Properties in Salem Current Sq. Ft. Gross Sq. Ft. 21,805 13,633 35,438 Net Sq. Ft. 15,500 8,000 23,500 eratin Ex enses For The Existin School ng and Old Health Welfare Buildinq(Combined) Land $158,400 Buildings 576,300 $734,7UU .-' Space Requirements Fact Sheet (cont.) page 2 4-11-ti 8 Cost Sharing of Current Rent Structure (Hard Dollars) Total State Count Health 42,000 23,100 12,600 Social Services 96,250 77,000 12,897 VPI Ext. -0- -0- -0- Total 138,250 100,100 25,497 ~-1 Salem 6,300 6,353 -0- 12,653 Renovation Options 1. HVAC, window treatments, re-use of existing interior space with minor modification - similar to Southview estimated at $20 per sq. ft. - $708,760 Total State Count Salem Operating 101,800 65,575 25,049 11,176 Capital 74,790 57,469 17,321 -0- Total 176,590 123,044 42,370 11,176 2. HVAC, windo w treatments, interior alterations for maximum utilization of interior spaces at $42 per sq. ft. - $1,488,400 Total State Count Salem Operating 101,800 65,575 25,049 11,176 Capital 157,281 120,685 36,596 -0- Total 259,081 186,260 61,645 11,176 3. New constru ction cost of comparable sized facility with modern envi ronmetal considerations at $65 per sq. ft. - $1,950,000 Total State Count Salem Operating 101,800 65,575 25,049 11,176 Capital 206,058 158,113 47,945 -0- 307,858 223,688 72,994 11,176 Rental 23,500 X $9 = 211,500 Total 211,500 State 136,417 Count 57,105 Salem 17,978 ACTION # A-42688-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept a $40,000 grant allocation from Virginia Water Project, Inc., for the Hollins Community Development Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~ ~/ ~ ~~ ~ ~ G~ //~' ~rX ~ c ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ BACKGROUND: A contract amendment request was submitted to and approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development in January 1988 to allow for the installation of private sewer/water service lateral lines and development of a community park. The other project activities include housing rehabilitation and road construction. Because of the increased cost for installation of the pri- vate sewer/water lateral lines, the Roanoke County staff worked with Virginia Water Project, Inc., (VWP) to secure an additional grant of $40,000. The low bid for the installation of the private lateral lines was $193,000. Acceptance of the $40,000 grant, in conjunction with existing project monies, will allow the installation of the private sewer/water service laterals to be accomplished on time and within budget. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Water Project, Inc., has allocated an additional $40,000 to the Hollins Community Development Project to assist low/moderate income families with the installation of private sewer/water service laterals. This additional allocation coupled with budgeted monies will provide the necessary funds to honor the low-bid contract award for 75 installations. No additional local funds will be required to honor this contract award. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative No. 1: Acceptance of the $40,000 grant alloca- tion for the Hollins Community Development Project from Virginia Water Project, Inc., provides the necessary funds to honor the low-bid contract award for the installation of private sewer/ water service laterals for 75 families. No additional local funds are required. .1J --~ Alternative No. 2: Failure to accept the $40,000 grant allocation from Virginia Water Project, Inc., will result in a funding deficit for installation of private sewer/water service laterals resulting in a non-functioning sewer/water system in a community which has poor percolation, raw sewage backflow, and pit privies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Alternative No. 1 to accept the $40,000 grant allocation for the Hollins Community Development Project from Virginia Water Project, Inc. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: 7 ,--' ~ / ~ ~/ Y Robert A. Stalzer Elmer C. odge Director of Planning & Zoning County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs Harry C. Nickens, Alternative Garrett x No. 1 Johnson x McGraw x _ Nickens x Robers x Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: File Rob Stalzer Sue Palmer ACTION # ITEM NUMBER., - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: April 26, 1988 Letter of understanding between Roanoke County and Lingerfelt Development, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS „ ,~~~~~~;~~~ ~' /J ~( ~ ~~,,~-c%zm ~ 2LaniZnyr,-rrf- ~~,rr% a ~J-~'~'~'~'~ cam ,,t _ " ~,,y . /~JJ ~/ ~( ,/ BACKGROUND ~Gv~c~rvwvr~-t4~Gl.. ,- --~+~-~-c.-f ' ~~ Roanoke County and Lingerfelt Development previously executed a project document that was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 1, 1987. Lingerfelt Development has now purchased the Phase I property and expects to close May 15 with a contract for the first building. This letter of understanding updates the project document and sets forth financing and responsibilities as well as a schedule for the construction of the industrial access road to serve Valleypointe, Phase I. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Lingerfelt Development, Inc. requests a letter of understanding that addresses the design and construction of the industrial access road. Since the original project document was signed, industrial access funds have been made available and the developer has prepared a project schedule. County utility improvements for water and sewer have been bid and construction is scheduled to begin in May 1988. Additionally, Lingerfelt Development requests that the project document dated December 1, 1987 should be amended in two areas: 1. The stormwater management concept of ten (10) year retention released at 2-year rate. 2. Requirement of minimum four (4) acre parcels is requested to apply to 50~ of the site rather than the entire site. The attached letter of understanding sets forth agreements discussed between County staff and Lingerfelt Development at the April 13, 1988 meeting. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS 1. Approve the letter of understanding and changes to project document dated December 1, 1987. 2. Amend the letter of understanding and changes to project document. 3. Do not approve the letter of understanding and changes to project document. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends Alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ 1 ~~.~ ~ Timothy W. Gu ala Director, Economic Development APPROVED BY: 9 r GLW Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers O~ ROANp~~ Z si ,7 ~ a 18 E50 8$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Alan Lingerfelt Lingerfelt Development Corporation 12 South Third Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Alan: Subject: Valleypointe Project This letter is to confirm our intent to proceed with the County participation in the referenced project as authorized in the project document approved by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on December 1, 1987. We intend to proceed as follows: 1. Roads. The County will enter into an agreement with VDOT, authorizing the County to administer the design and construction of the industrial access road to serve the proposed Valleypointe Phase I project. 2. The County will seek bids or proposals on or before May 2, 1988 for the design and construction of the industrial access road (with four lane road with roadside ditches, VDOT standards to the industrial access site) and the associated intersection improvements to Kenworth and Thirlane Roads and signalization to serve the proposed Valleypointe Phase I project. 3. The County shall complete the acquisition of approximately 8 acres of real estate from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for the proposed industrial access road to Phase I of this project. In consideration for the design and construction of these road improvements the County shall negotiate a payment schedule and terms with the contractor substantially as follows: a. "Payment in Kind" i.e. land (transfer to the contractor any excess land remaining after dedication of right-of-way to VDOT); b. the purchase price of $260,000 of the Ida Mae Holland estate parcel and related costs will be credited towards the County limit of $2 million to public infrastructure improvements to this project; C~A~tnf~ i1~ ~i~Mnt1~2P April 22, 1988 .~ - 3 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 Mr. Alan Lingerfelt 2 April 22, 1988 ~~~ c. payment to contractor of an amount not to exceed $520,000, upon approval by VDOT of design and construction plans and authorization to proceed from VDOT, but not earlier than July 5, 1988. d. payment of balance of contract amount due to contractor upon completion of work, acceptance of work by VDOT and reimbursement of eligible costs by VDOT, subject to amount of reimbursement by VDOT less funds escrowed for qualifying user in connection with the allocations of industrial access funds. This means that the escrow fund amount will remain at $300,000 ($220,000 County general funds plus $80,000 from State reimbursement) until such time as qualifying industry(ies) locate in Valleypointe, Phase I to meet the State requirements for industrial access road. e. in no event shall total County payment for said road improvements exceed $1,000,000 ($260,000 land acquisition; plus $520,000, County general funds; plus $220,000 escrow funds). 4. The County will place the construction and upgrading of a road to service the Phase II property from Peters Creek Road to the northern property line of Phase II in the six-year secondary highway plan. To the extent that secondary road funds are available, the County will request construction of this road within 18 months of your note to the County of your obligation to close on twenty (20) or more acres of Phase II property. The County may supplement secondary road funds with any funds that may be left in the $2 million allocation or with any other state funds that the road may be eligible for. In no event will the County provide this road prior to April 1, 1991. 5. Utilities. The County will proceed with the construc- tion of off-site utilities to provide adequate water and sewer to the Phase I property with a target completion date of August 17, 1988. As of this date, you will begin paying minimum monthly water and sewer service rates of $500 per month for each utility until such time actual connections are made to each building. You will be responsible for installing the sewer from the I-581 right-of-way to and within your development. We will install the water through the development to the northern end of the access road at Woodhaven and to the southern end of the access road at Peters Creek. Mr. Alan Lingerfelt 3 April 22, 1988 ~'. The County will construct adequate water and sewer service to service the first section devloped in Phase II within 270 days of notice of obligation to close on 15 more acres of the Phase II property. In any event, the Phase II utilities will not be required prior to April 1, 1990. The County will obtain all required permits and easements except for easements through what is known as the Phase I and Phase II property which you will obtain. You may also be eligible for water and sewer credits and/or reimbursement in accordance with the County Code for any off-site and oversized lines that you construct. These utilities will be constructed to the extent that funds are available within the $2 million allocated to the project of which $1 million is currently allocated for off-site utilities. In the event these funds are insufficient, you will be eligible for off-site credits for utilities you construct in accordance with the County Code. 6. Amendment to project document. The County Adminis- trator will request the Board of Supervisors at the April 26, 1988 meeting to amend the project document approved at the December 1, 1987 meeting to limit the four acre parcel size restriction to 50~ of the prop- erty and to reword the stormwater management clause to duplicate the condition on stormwater management in the rezoning proffer. This letter in no way changes the obligation previously made by the County to provide $2 million in funding and to pursue State sources of funding. This letter in no way obligates you or the County to Phase II development unless it is economically feasible as previously agreed upon. This letter does however, confirm your intent to finalize development plans for Phase II as soon as possible in order that we may proceed with Phase II utilities at an earlier date if we so desire. Project management will be accomplished by coordination between your representatives through Tom Medley and County staff through Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development. Enclosed are target dates which have been agreed upon and an estimate of the manner in which the $2 million will be expended. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Sincerely, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator TWGubala/sbo r.. It is the intent of the County that the following target dates be accomplished: April 30, 1988 Agreement between County and VDOT author- dminister design and izing County to a construction of industrial access road improvement. 1988 May 2 Bids or request for proposals requested of i , on by County for design and construct industrial access road improvements. May 23, 1988 Award of design and construction contract. June 20, 1988 Approval of design and construction plans roceed with to i p on by VDOT, authorizat construction. June 27, 1988 Begin construction. October 14, 1988 Completion of construction. -" Mr. Alan Lingerfelt 4 April 22, 1988 pc Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County Attorney Paul Mahoney Scott Hodge, Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern Clifford Craig, Utility Director Bill Gieg, McGuire, Woods, Battle and Booth Tom Medley, Innsbrook Management Company Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Enclosure ACTION # A-42688-4 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, Construction of access road improvements to Valleypointe (Phase I) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: pt,v,.C ~ G~ c, .2Z ,,/may ~~P'~2~~ BACKGROUND ~~/ ~~ ~~~ Roanoke County has been notified of Virginia Department of Highway (VDOT) approval of industrial access funds in the amount of $300,000 (to be matched with $150,000 of County funds and $150,000 State funds) to construct a road into Valleypointe, Phase I. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Lingerfelt Development has a contract to purchase and close on the Harris-Moomaw property by May 15, 1988 and has a prospective tenant wishing to occupy a building by October 15, 1988. In order to meet the development schedule, road construction needs to be expedited. Normal VDOT construction procedures would not allow the road to be constructed by the state in time to meet this schedule. Road construction could occur within this schedule if Roanoke County constructs the road utilizing a design-build concept. This would allow engineering plans and specifications to be pre- pared and the road constructed by October 15, 1988. Project management would be the responsibility of the road engineer/con- tractor and not on Roanoke County. The road design/construction could be less than the current $970,000 estimate, but in any case, Roanoke County's commitment is limited to $1 million for non-utility construction at Valley- pointe already approved by the Board. Roanoke County would provide right-of-way by exchanging the Ida Mae Holland property for Airport Commission property. The County would also pay $520,000 which has been budgeted "up front" for construction and the remaining $450,000 would be provided by VDOT upon road completion and acceptance. To initiate construction, the Board of Supervisors needs to take the following actions: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute a County-State agreement to accept industrial access funds in the amount of $450,000 ($321,500 approved on March 17, 1988 and $178,500 approved April 21, 1988). 2. Authorize the issuance of bids for the design-build of indus- trial access road, signalization and intersection improvements to serve Valleypointe, Phase I. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative 1. Allow VDOT to construct the road according to their schedule which would delay construction and development of Valleypointe. Alternative 2: Roanoke County administers the design and construction of the access road during 1988. If Roanoke County elects to administer the construction, the County will pay $520,000 "up front" and request $450,000 reimbursement from the State upon completion and acceptance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends Alternative 2 with the understanding that the contract will be brought back to the Board for awarding at the May 24, 1988 meeting. Si7BMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~,(~. ~~iiu.-i ~.,~.~' Timot y W. Gub la Elmer C. Ho Director, Economic Development County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ Harr v No Yes Abstain Denied ( ) C Nickens, Alternative #2 and Garrett x Received ( ) letter of thanks sent to Johnson x Referred Musselwhite and Cranwell for McGraw x To their assistance Nickens x Robers x Attachment cc: File Tim Gubala ,~ ~ ~~ r,~ .. 66 ty A`s3~q+-a f~ hy. tiff a~ ,wc 1;~- '~.tHyra. tl', ~~~~ DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION J P. O. BOX 3071 RAY D. PETHTEL SALEM, 24153 B. W. SUMPTER COMMISSIONER March 25, 1988 DISTRICT ENGINEER Route 1947 - Roanoke County Project 1947-080-242, C501 Industrial Access Valleypointe - Phase 1 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator of Roanoke County P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: I am_ pleased to advise that the Commonwealth Transportation Board at its meeting on March 17, 1988, allocated $321,500.00 to provide adequate access to the Valleypointe - Phase 1 Commercial Park located off of Route 117. A copy of the adopted resolution is attached. Sincerely, ~`~ ~- B. W. Sumpter District Engineer BWS:mrc Attachment c: Mr_ F. C. Altizer, Jr. - attachment 1 TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Moved by Mr. MusselWh.ite, seconded by Mr. Qui.Cke that WHEREAS, Section 33.1-221 of the Code of Virginia provides a fund to "... be expended by the Board for constructing, reconstructing, maintaining or improving access roads within counties, cities and towns to industrial sites on which manufacturing, processing or other establishments will be built• under firm contract or are already constructed and to publicly owned airports; ...."; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has, by resolution, requested industrial access funds to serve the Valleypointe, Phase I Commercial Park located off Route 117 in Roanoke County, and said access is estimated to cost $970,000; and WHEREAS, it appears that this request falls within the intent of Section 33.1-221 and has complied with the provisions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's policy on the use of industrial access funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that $321,500 of the industrial Access Fund be allocated to provide adequate access to the proposed Valleypointe - Phase I Commercial Park located off Route 117 in Roanoke County, Project 1947-080-242, C501, contingent upon 1. all necessary right of way and utility adjustments being provided at no cost to the Commonwealth; 2. the execution of an appropriate contractual agreement, with bond, between Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), to provide for: a) the design and construction of this project, b) the contribution of the required $150,000 matching funds by Roanoke County, c) the payment of all ineligible project costs, and of any eligible costs in excess of this. allocation, from sources other than VDOT, and 2 ~- d) the forfeiture of the bond in the event that, by March 17, 1990, no qualifying industry has constructed, or is under firm contract to construct, on Site A of Valleypointe Phase I, a facility with eligible capital investment of at least $4,715,000. MOTION CARRIED. March 17, 1988 3 t ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Vehicle Utilization Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS' ~ ~~~ .~~~ ~ r~~`''` . ~ ~ ~. ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ BACKGROUND: At the April 12, 1988 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the draft of the Vehicle Utilization Policy was discussed and several suggestions were offered by members of the Board of Supervisors. These suggestions have been reviewed by the County Administrator's committee and encompassed in the proposed vehicle utilization policy. The revised policy (attached) is submitted for your consideration. When adopted, it should be returned to the County Administrator for implementation and enforcement. The Committee feels that this policy will allow the departments to provide efficient and cost effective services to the citizens of Roanoke County and also provide a mechanism for curtailing any misuse of County owned property which may be occurring. To date, 18 vehicles have been identified for disposal and several others will likely be identified as the analysis is finalized. These 18 vehicles will represent a savings of $12,264 based on 1987-88 insurance rates. Any vehicles approved in the budget for replacement will require a vehicle to be turned in for disposal. Any new vehicles must pass the tests of Section 2 of the proposed policy. It should also be noted that several localities are considering a salary supplement to certain key employees in lieu of a mileage allowance or the providing of a municipally owned vehicle. In most cases this allowance is ranging from $200 to $25U per month. ALTERNATIVES & IMPACTS: Alternative #1 - Adopt the attached vehicle utilization policy authorizing the County Administrator to implement and enforce its provisions. ~-.L/ Alternative #2 - Designate which if any employees should be considered for an automobile allowance (supplement to salary) and determine the annual rate. Alternative #3 - Direct the County Administrator and staff to continue the analysis of the vehicle inventory without adoption of a formal vehicle utilization policy. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of alternative #1 and to consider the change in the mileage reimbursement rate when changes are authorized by the General Assembly. Respectfully submitted, John M. Chamb 'ss, Jr. Assistant Administrator Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers JMC/cw Attachments ~-5 TOTAL VEHICLES Heavy Equip. Pick Ups/Special Equip. Vans Spec. Equip. Sedans - Sheriff Sedans - Fire pick Ups Other Passage Vans - Other Sedans Other Number 365 119 53 12 93 12 16 6 54 Attachment A Night Time Use 144* 14 2 93 11 4 0 20 *General Government Departments VEHICLE UTILIZATION POLICY Purpose ~ -5 It is necessary and proper for many County employees to have County- owned or personal vehicles at their disposal to properly perform their assigned duties. The County does not desire to curtail the use of vehicles that are necessary for effective service delivery, however, it is essential that guidelines be established to ensure that the vehicles are being used with the utmost care and discretion and that they are being used in a manner consistent with the intent of the assignment. This policy will establish the criteria under which vehicles will be assigned to departments, the criteria under which vehicles will be authorized for take-home by employees, and the criteria for equitable compensation for County employees utilizing personal vehicles in the performance of their duties. Policy 1. General Use a. County-owned vehicles may be used only for official County business. It is recognized that official County business occurs both during regular business hours and after hours for some employees. b. Personal use is prohibited under this policy. De minimis personal use (such as transportation to and from meal and break periods) is allowed under this policy. c. Only County employees who have valid and current Virginia motor vehicle operator's license may drive a County-owned vehicle. In addition, only County employees or those individuals engaged in County business may ride in a County-owned vehicle. 2. Assignment of Vehicles to Departments a. Regular full-time assignment of vehicles to a department must be justified and proven cost effective. A department's request shall be based on at least one of the following: 1. A vehicle is or does contain special equipment necessary for the proper and effective performance of County work. 2. A vehicle will be used for official County business a minimum of 10,000 non-commuting miles per year or a minimum of l0 hours away from the office per week. 3. No other vehicle already assigned to the department can be reassigned on a time-sharing basis to fill the department's requirements. 4. Documented evidence must prove that it is to the County's benefit from an economic or level of service standpoint for the department to have a vehicle assigned to it. (The motor pool has been eliminated at this time.) b. On January lst of each fiscal year, each department shall submit to the Department of Management and Budget a listing of all vehicles assigned to their department. The list shall include the vehicle number, description, condition, and a brief justification as to why the department needs that vehicle. .. • ~ -2- ~LJ - ~~ 3, Nighttime Assignment of Vehicles to Individuals a. A County-owned vehicle shall not be taken home on a regular basis unless authorized by the County Administrator or his designee. A list of vehicle assignments to be authorized shall be submitted by each department manager through his Director to the County Administrator annually on January 1st. The list shall include detailed justification for each vehicle recommended and shall cite the specific criteria outlined below upon which the recommendation is based, This list may be combined with the list required from Section 2, but must also include the employee's home address, round-trip distance to the employee's residence, and a more detailed justification. b, The following criteria shall be used in recommending approval for taking a County-owned vehicle home on a regular basis: 1, The employee must answer emergency calls involving the potential loss of life or property where an immediate response is required. 2, The employee must routinely attend to work-related functions, away from the normal work site and outside of normal working hours, on the average of at least twice per week, 3, Documented evidence must prove that it is to the County's benefit from an economic or level of service standpoint for the employee to have a vehicle assigned to him for take-home use. c. No employee may drive a vehicle to and from his residence outside of the County's borders without specific approval from the County Administrator 4, Utilization of personal Vehicles on County Business Employees using personal vehicles in the performance of their assigned duties shall be compensated for such usage at the current mileage reimbursement rate established by the Board of Supervisors (currently 21~/mile). These employees must receive prior authorization from their department managers or director and file a monthly report of mileage to receive compensation, ITEM NUMBER /c AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Request for a public hearing to: (1) charge the Roanoke County Fire Marshal with enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, (2) imposition of fees for the permits as identified in Section F-104.1 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Request is made for a first reading on May 10, 1988 and the second reading and public hearing to be on May 24, 1988. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ i~~ ~ /J~. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Old Code At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on August 28, 1984, the Basic Fire Prevention Code of 1981, Fifth Edition, of BOCA International, Inc. was adopted. The 1981 Fire Prevention Code is a set of regulations addressing fire and safety standards for existing buildings. The code has been accepted by local business people and has reduced the fire loss in Roanoke County. Adoption of this code was in line with State legislation. The 1981 BOCA code is strictly a maintenance code. Section 8.2-15 makes provisions for permit fees. None have been established. New Code The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is a mandatory statewide set of regulations. It was adopted by the Board of Housing and Community Development on December 14, 1987. The new code became effective March 1, 1988. It supercedes all fire prevention regulations heretofore adopted by local governments. More restrictive amendments may be adopted if they do not affect the manner of construction or materials to be used. Maior Changes The Statewide Fire Prevention Code requires resident and employee training in certain occupancies. The areas of training are in exit drills, life safety procedures, and evacuation drills. Action Required F-102.1 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code gives the local government the option to enforce the code through the local fire marshal. The State Fire Marshal shall enforce the code in those jurisdictions that choose not to enforce the code. ,., Action Recommended: I recommend that the Board of Supervisors charge the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County with enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. I request that a $25 permit fee be imposed for each of the 32 areas so addressed in the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The permit process is to be administered as outlined by Section F- 104 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the scheduling of a public hearing on this proposed ordinance for May 24, 1988. FISCAL IMPACT The additional required training will increase the workload of this division. .Additional secretarial work will require a permanent secretary to be assigned. This can be done without additional personnel through reassignment. An additional inspector will be required to meet the needs of the code. The permit fees could be used to offset the cost. SUBMITTED BY: :~ R. R. Sh rp Fire Marshal APPROVED: v~ ~ Elmer C. Aodge, Jr. County Administrator /- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ITEM NUMBER C°. r 1- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Buildincl Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins Magisterial District. His term expired January 22, 1988. Four-year term of B. J. King, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. His term expires April 13, 1988. Four-year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton Magisterial District. His term expires April 27, 1988. 2 Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Familv Services Advisory Board• One-year term of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. Two-year terms of Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District; Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton District; and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District expired 3/22/88. One-year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring, expired 3/22/88. Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services, has indicated that this Council has not been active for quite some time. Staff is investigating the future active status of this Council. 3 Fifth Planninct District Commission Three-year unexpired term of Citizen Representative and Executive Committee member Timothy Gubala. Mr. Gubala's term expires June 30, 1989. Mr. Gubala has recommended that John Hubbard be appointed to fill his term. (See attached memorandum) 4 Industrial Development Authority ~ ._ L.!/ This Committee is also inactive, but does have financial and legal obligations on behalf of the County. The attorney for the Industrial Development Authority recommends that new members be appointed or the old members reappointed even though it is not active at this time. Four-year terms of Charles R. Saul, Cave Spring Magisterial District and Bill Triplett, Vinton Magisterial District. Their terms expired September 26, 1987. Mr. Saul and Mr. Triplett have indicated their willingness to continue to serve in this capacity. 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year unexpired term of Leonard Winger, Cave Spring Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1989. Please see attached letter of resignation. Three-year unexpired term of at-large member Michael J. Lazzuri. His term will expire June 30, 1990. Please see attached letter of resignation. 6. Total Action Aqainst Poverty Board of Directors Two-year terms of Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes and Mr. Cabell Brand. Their terms expire May 3, 1988. Mr. Brand is a joint appointee with the City of Salem. SUBMITTED BY: ~'a~ ~ Q Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: _ APPROVED BY: ~G~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE Yes No Garrett _ Johnson _ McGraw _ Nickens _ Robers Abs '~. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMF;NTS AND APPEALS A. COMPOSITION• To be comprised of five (5) members; appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Members may be reappointed, and terms should be staggered so that less than half of the terms expire in any one year. The Board of Supervisors may appoint alternate members who may sit on the Board in the absence of any regular.iaembers, and shall have the ~Eull power and authority of the regular member.. Board members shall be selected on the basis of their ability to ' render fair and competent decisions regarding application of the ;,~~. code, and shall to the extent possible represent .different ' occupational or professional fields: At least one member should be an experienced builder. At least one member should be a ' licensed professional engineer or architect.. 8. DUTIES: Shall act on application for appeals,as~required by Section. 36-105 of the Code of Virginia; or it shall enter into an agreement with the governing body of another county or municipality or with some other agency, or a State agency . approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and'Community Development. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: The Board shall meet upon notice of the chairman or at stated periodic meetings if warranted by the. volume of work. The Board shall meet within ten working days of the filing of an appeal. ~ " ,,°, RT SERVICES UNIT p 'AMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two .district, and one youth membe bodies of each county and cit appoint one or more members to AND members.~rom each magisterial r Erom each high.school. Governing y served by a court service unit may a ciCizen advisory council. • B.. DUTIES Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters a~fectinq the working of this law and other laws•relatinq to children, their care ~.nd protection and ho domestic relations; Consults and con:Eer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension oE•• the court service program; Encourage the members selected by the council to serve,on~ the central advisory council to visit as often as•the member. conveniently can, institutions and•associations receiving children under this law and to report to the court the conditions and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any such persons, institutions or associations. . The Council should make themselves Familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report~to the court and the participating governing bodies on the•work of the council. As the Youth and Family. Services Advisory Board:_ Establish goals and priorities for County-wide-youth services; assist in coordination and planning Eor comprehensive youth services within the private sector. Serve in~an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance wi~tti all "minimum Standards of the Delinc~uency~Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment o~ the needs of youth every Eive years and to assist in developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, Further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board oP Supervisors. Provide a public Forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns o~F public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth development and to support the development o:~ needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place determined at meetings. ~,-~ FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who ' shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall~be three years. One of the members shall-also serve on the Executive Committee . The Fifth Planning District Commission represents participating local governments included in the geographic area delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is composed of 21 elected and citizen representatives of the participating jurisdictions. B. DUTIES The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia ( Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient development of the physical, social and economic elements of the District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental subdivisions to plan for the future." The general management program category provides the ~. basic organization and management of commission activities and routine administrative functions. Because general management supports the entire operation of the commission's work program, costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation Plan . C. MEETING SCHEDULE Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.) ~~~ p ~1 M E M O R A N D U M T0: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Timothy W. Gubala ( ~~t/~ DATE: March 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Appointment to the Fifth Planning District Commission I discussed this appointment with John Hubbard and he has agreed to serve as Roanoke County's representative on the Executive Committee. I will continue to serve through the month of March. This action of, placing John on the Executive Committee should be taken ~by=~Boa.r.d,rof Supervisors action at the March; 22, 1988' meeting. ~ '~ sbo pc John Hubbard `„~ '" L`! INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A. COMPOSITION: (Summarized from State Code 15.1.1377) To be composed of seven (7) directors, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; for terms of four (4) years, except appointments to fill vacancies which shall be for the unexpired terms. B. DUTIES: Has authority to sue or be sued and to prosecute and defend at law or in equity in any court having jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties. Adopted and use a corporate seal; Contract and be contracted with; Acquire, improve and maintain and equip and furnish one or more authority facilities including all real and personal properties which the board of directors of the authority may-deem necessary in connection therewith and regardless of whether or not any such facilities shall then be in existence; To lease to others any or all of its facilities and to charge and collect rent therefore; To issue its bonds for the purpose of carrying out any of its powers including specifically any power conferred. To appoint an industrial advisory committee to advise the authority; To borrow money and to accept contributions, grants, and other financial assistance from the United States of America and agencies or instrumentalities thereof, the Commonwealth or any political subdivision, agency or public instrumentality of the Commonwealth for or in aid of the construction, acquisition, ownership, maintenance or repair of the authority facilities. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Called meetings. `-~ - PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985) To be composed of two (2> members from each magisterial district and one (1) member at large from the County. All members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Original terms shall be staggared. Upon expiration of their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3) years, expiring on June 30th. B. DUTIES: The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors .through the Director of Parks and Recreation, .within its powers and responsibilities as stated in this resolution.. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors, and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters. The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies, programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and disposing of lands and properties related to the total community recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for recreation. The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds, recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation. Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4) and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department function, and will advise in regard to other recreation facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or loaned to the unit. n .~ • • • C ~ • Roanoke's t~iumber One Real Estate Company T R March 24 , 1988~~ -- ~~"~j Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: Due to the demands of my real estate business and other personal considerations I am hereby resigning from the Parks and Recreation Commission of Roanoke County. I thank you for the opportunity to serve in this capacity. Sinc ely, /,, / c Len Winger /dw O Main Office / Rt. 419 O 460 East Office S22 Elector. i~oaA, ~ i^.! (17; ::19i. IZoanokc. VA 24Q!(1 ;i5.:ii i:n:u;ye ~1vc . N.F. (RI 460). !?oanoke, V.~ 2401? I' Q 13iix Hfit4, (ioanoke, V!1 7.4014 I' U li~>k i tgfi3, fio:~nokc, V/1 ?402[ ( 70:5) 9Fi9-OR)''i (i Qa) :44;i-;~fi(X1 .,~""' ~ ...~r ." 5812 Knowles Dr. S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 28, 1988 Mrs. Yvonne Willis, Chairperson Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 2941 Creekwood Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Yvonne: The purpose of this letter is to tender my resignation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission to be effective on the 15th day of April, 1988. My association with the Commission has been a rewarding one and has been very educational for me. I hope that my participation on the Commission has likewise been beneficial to the Department of Parks and Recreation and the programs that it offers to the citizens of Roanoke County. I have served on the Commission since its inception and feel that both the Commission and the new Director are well established and moving forward together in creating a reasonable parks and recreation program for the cirtizens of the County. Although I would like to continue on the Commission, I find that I do not have the time to participate in all the things that I would like. I will not continue on the Commission or on other committees unless I can devote the time necessary to complete the tasks assigned with an acceptable degree of professionalism. Prehaps in the future I will be able to again participate in the activities of the Commission or serve in some other capacity for the Board of County Supervisors. I wish you, the other members of the Commission, and the staff of the Department of Parks and Recreation my best wishes for the future. If I can answer any questions for you do not hestitate to call. Very truly yours, Michael J. azzuri cc: Board of County Supervisors Stephen H. Carpenter TAP BOARD OF DIRECTORS A. COMPOSITION: " LO To consists of thirty-six (36) members, divided into three (3) groups - elected officials - representatives of the poor - and representatives of private organizations. The Board of Supervisors shall appoint one (1) representative, and one (1) joint appointee/City of Salem. B. DUTIES• Board of Directors manages the Total Action Against Poverty in the Roanoke Valley. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Third Tuesday of each month at TAP Headquarters at 3:00 p.m. ~Q~ iAP' , Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 702 Shenandoah Avenue, N. W., P. O. Box 2868, Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 ~. March 21, 1988 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Administrator Roanoke County P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: It is time once again for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to appoint your representatives to the .TAP Board of Directors 'for a two-year term beginning May 3, 1988 and ending May 3, 1990. Your current representatives, Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes and>Mr. Cabell Brand, are eligible for reappointment to the TAP Board. Enclosed is the required form to be filled out and returned to us as soon as possible naming your appointments to the TAP Board. The TAP agency deeply appreciates the interest and support of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors throughout the years. Si cerely yours, // / Mr. Monty P male Chairman Membership Committee MP/ljb Enclosures Npm~ N!~-tco~5 To CY1 ~ A~~-~~.-~ I~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION N0.42688-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 26, 1988, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution joining the League of Older American to honor the elderly in the month of May. 2. Acceptance of Airpoint Drive, Airpoint Road, Village Lane, Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane into the Va. Department of Transportation's Secondary System. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, The League of Older Americans, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 4. Authorization for use of the Bent Mountain Fire Station by a civic organization. 5. Approval of proposed agreement with Appalachian Power Company for July 1987 through June 1990. 6. Authorization to execute Memorandum of Agreement with Va. Department of Emergency Services. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens after deleting Item I-2 for discussion, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Following discussion, Supervisor Nickens moved approval of Item I-2 as amended, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and upon the following voice vote: AYES; Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGarw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ~C,C~e~~ Mary H, lien, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File League of Older Americans Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Tommy Fuqua, Fire and Rescue Chief John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 26, 1988, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution joining the League of Older American to honor the elderly in the month of May. 2. Acceptance of Airpoint Drive, Airpoint Road, Village Lane, Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane into the Va. Department of Transportation's Secondary System. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, The League of Older Americans, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 4. Authorization for use of the Bent Mountain Fire Station by a civic organization. 5. Approval of proposed agreement with Appalachian Power Company for July 1987 through June 1990. 6. Authorization to execute Memorandum of Agreement with Va. Department of Emergency Services. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said ._Z"- / - ~ items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Appreciation for League of Older Americans and the Elderly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The month of May has been designated Older Americans Month. The League of Older Americans will be joining other agencies to demonstrate in various ways its continuing commitment to the elderly of Roanoke County. As part of their plans to honor older citizens, they have requested that the Board of Supervisors pass a resolution expressing their regard for the elderly. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted and that a copy be sent to the League of Older Americans. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE LEAGUE OF AMERICANS AND IN HONOR OF THE ELDERLY WHEREAS, the rapid graying of our population is a cause for genuine concern for governments at every level; and WHEREAS, this segment of our populace symbolizes for all of us a lifetime body of work and contributions from which our community will continue to benefit; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a time be set aside during which we acknowledge the efforts of those who have given so much and earned for themselves a dignified and honored position in our society; and WHEREAS, the month of May has been set aside as Older Americans' Month to focus the nation's attention on the accomplishments and the plight of our older citizens; and WHEREAS, the League of Older Americans represents the over 13,000 elderly people of the County of Roanoke. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia joins the League of Older Americans in urging all citizens to demonstrate their regard for our elderly during May, and to give special consideration to the very old and the frail and needy. a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-4.a OF APPRECIATION TO THE LEAGUE OF AMERICANS AND IN HONOR OF THE ELDERLY WHEREAS, the rapid graying of our population is a cause for genuine concern for governments at every level; and WHEREAS, this segment of our populace symbolizes for all of us a lifetime body of work and contributions from which our community will continue to benefit; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a time be set aside during which we acknowledge the efforts of those who have given so much and earned for themselves a dignified and honored position in our society; and WHEREAS, the month of May has been set aside as Older Americans' Month to focus the nation's attention on the accomplishments and the plight of our older citizens; and WHEREAS, the League of Older Americans represents the over 13,000 elderly people of the County of Roanoke. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia joins the League of Older Americans in urging all citizens to demonstrate their regard for our elderly during May, and to give special consideration to the very old and the frail and needy. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File League of Older Americans ITEM NUMBER -~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Roadways into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System (Airpoint Road and Airpoint Drive, Airpoint Subdivision; Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane, Nichols Estate; and Village Lane, Plantation Village Subdivision) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The residents along these subdivision roadways are requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that these roads be taken into the State Secondary System. Staff has inspected these roadways along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The necessary improvements to the roadways have been agreed to by the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation and Roanoke County is acquiring or has acquired the necessary right-of-way and drainage and construction easements. FISCAL IMPACT: Improvements to these roads are included within the 1985 Roanoke County Road Bond. The estimated costs are as follows: 1) Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road - $150,000 2) Village Lane 15,000 3) Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane - 40,000 ...L _ ~~' RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolutions requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation accept Airpoint Drive and. Airpoint Road, Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane, and Village Lane into the State Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~-~ __ Phillip T. Henry, P.E: Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------A~mrnN VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 .~` ~~ r NORTN ~I 2.65 ! 3 • 28 Ac E 5.42 Ac 5.IOAc(D 29 1.92 Ac (C 2.51ac(o1 / I.TOac(c) 24 g R • ~ •' ~ Z~ ~ ! ~ y / ~ J ~ ,17 •o, 2 z 4 K 16 r 3 , / . 2B0 ~"` ~ ~ /s .23 .. R 22 1.4TAc 5 s ,~ LtT • X35 6 s a ~ ""~/ ZSI~c IO / ~ lb4 ac , 9 . s~ 36 ~-~ is ~~~; r L90Ac 1.T5Ac 'CT '"`'6 `~ 1.40 OOAc~- S 23 , / I / . SI ~~ _ ~ / t+c L 50 2.T9 Ac ~, 2.61 ac ,~ Ac 24 .~ u.rr. c~-+s~ ~ ~ 2.00~1c „/ Tw w~w«. b1A~ . /~ 210A~ _ 9 ~ Ac 3.06 360+hc 40 28 ~ 4S62Ac 4.93 Ac Z.36ac 26.1 / 4.42~Ac . Acceptance of Airpoint Road and Airpoint Drive PUBLIC FACILITIES 3 ~' -~.. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting acceptance of Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby rescinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending from Bent Mountain Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 711), and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoint Road and 0.25 miles to a turn around, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, dated July 9, 1965, with necessary easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4 "' .~. 5. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 6. That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 ~, .aRM$ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ `O . ~ 690 re~;;9 ( ~~ ~ :.~ ~ HOMF~L~ACE ~ ~,; _ '~ ~ HOMEw00D I J ~~ ~- ~ , ~.~~a~ a . H~y¢. / .€ ~ ,'_.~ M' :` t ?~ ~ c~OS ~ , : c` o"`E au .?`' 3 iS P xc ~ N 155 - V GHFIEIDS ~, ~ HiC I ~`A • P 4. nv~...~ 1> VICINITY M l ~ ~ 1 ,r•..., ~'~ g ~~ 4P~~~ dry J yY ~~~ d~ ~ADNA t' ,~ r OA NORTH Acceptance of Wing Commander Drive and PUBLIC FACILITIES Grape Tree Lane 6 -_.. ~~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WING COMMANDER DRIVE & GRAPE TREE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Wing Commander Drive, a section of road extending from Roselawn Road (Route 689), 0.14 miles west of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221), and extending in a northwestly direction 0.19 miles to Grape Tree Lane; and Grape Tree Lane, from cul-de-sac to cul-de-sac and intersecting with Wing Commander Drive, extending in a northeasterly direction 0.18 miles pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 86, dated May 20, 1977, with necessary easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to July 1, 1988, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 7 .~ 4. That said roads known as Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane, which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 8 -~~ NORTH 48 4.ISAc ' ~ 59 !N , ,41 ` 46 ' X60 •'J ~ 45 . 44 . 17 43 ~61 ! ~ 4~ A • v ~ 6z r \•o , 63 ~ : P tt~ 1 I ~. p, \pee Jai ' '~ QJ ~ s~~ .? , 7T ~ o w' / ~ / ~ ~ ~ s Y ~ ~ / JN azs ,\ \Sx . 76 e 59 r ~ r a 3 r ° ~! O N rr ° ~ ~ .~ 37 t/ '°e 1 31 r5 ~' ! ° ! ' , t L j 3 7 s• 17 R ~ •~ eo V ,23' 2~. J ' ~ " M76°' • piontation f ' ~ o 9 os o ° y ' 4 5 _ xx ~ ,~ o , to 3 0 _ 5 J~ \ B ~ ~ ~ ~' - 'J7 \ , ~`~ ! 1. U. Sn \36 ~ f I •f r o G 16f3 1~'el • 1"!9 M~ '. J ' \ ' /r 19 is 1 e3 s a rJ \ Zx i P • t 2!) _ 18 - ti B J J ~ . 23 ~ ~ n ~ .~ ~ ~ 2 c I e}d, ezos Jrlr 1 7 :'- \.e v 22 r ~" ~ `°xx ~r 'o ~s ~d° ~ eon / !'J ~ ~ 1/ \bo ~° r e a6 s \ 69~e 21 Be 4 2 7,4~C . ra 21 J °~ 4 uo d .o ~ a 40 ti 7 ~ ~ ,$ e. ~ ~~ 20 ~ ro ` t' o ~ rp ~ ~ Or • o' po \ sa is 19 `'... ' . 6 ` ~ ~ l~~S /9 o~, ~ 24 .~. " f J _ ' ~` ws C~e~ 30.06 SLOB J6 rq 3, 3 oS 4 ti 5 r ez s3 so I ~ .o• i e. ~ ! p -0 ~~. ~ -/ !J ". 35 .o ,, 34 . ~ ~ J 'I ~6 T I I '<~ 7 U ~~ ~ r) ~O aj 0% 1O ~ f ~ OV 13 ',,,~ .~ „ ~ ,.o ~ ,.. _ 14 Acceptance of Village Lane PUBLIC FACILITIES 9 r . _ °' .~. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF VILLAGE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Village Lane, a section of road extending from Verndale Drive (Route 1867), 0.05 miles west of Plantation Road (Route 115), and extending in a northerly direction 0.05 miles to the cul-de-sac pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 51, dated December 3, 1974, with necessary right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That said road known as Village Lane which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the 10 ...L " state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 11 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-5 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting acceptance of Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby rescinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending from Bent Mountain Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 711), and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoint Road and 0.27 miles to a turn around, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, dated July 9, 1965, with necessary easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 5. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 6. That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon a unanimous voice vote. A COPY - TESTE: ..~ . Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. for Com. Service & Dev Virginia Department of Transportation 2 AMENDED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-6 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WING COMMANDER DRIVE & GRAPE TREE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Wing Commander Drive, a section of road extending from Roselawn Road (Route 689), 0.14 miles west of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221), and extending in a northwestly direction 0.19 miles to Grape Tree Lane; and Grape Tree Lane, from cul-de-sac to cul-de-sac and intersecting with Wing Commander Drive, extending in a northeasterly direction 0.18 miles pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 86, dated May 20, 1977, with necessary easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 1 4. That said roads known as Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane, which are show resolution, be, and the roads to become a part of in Roanoke County, only acceptance of said street of Transportation. n on a certain sketch accompanying this same are hereby established as public the state secondary system of highways from and after notification of official or highway by the Virginia Department On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon a unanimous voice vote. A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. for Com. Services & Dev Virginia Department of Transportation 2 Y ~ ~ ~ I AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-7 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF VILLAGE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Village Lane, a section of road extending from Verndale Drive (Route 1867), 0.05 miles west of Plantation Road (Route 115), and extending in a northerly direction 0.05 miles to the cul-de-sac pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 51, dated December 3, 1974, with necessary right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That said road known as Village Lane which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the • ', state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon a unanimous voice vote. A COPY - TESTE: yY~' ,~• Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. for Com. Services & Dev Virginia Department of Transportation 2 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-6 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WING COMMANDER DRIVE & GRAPE TREE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Wing Commander Drive, a section of road extending from Roselawn Road (Route 689), 0.14 miles west of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221), and extending in a northwestly direction 0.19 miles to Grape Tree Lane; and Grape Tree Lane, from cul-de-sac to cul-de-sac and intersecting with Wing Commander Drive, extending in a northeasterly direction 0.18 miles pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 86, dated May 20, 1977, with necessary easements for drainage on record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to July 1, 1988, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That said roads known as Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane, which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon a unanimous voice vote. A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. for Com. Services & Dev Virginia Department of Transportation 2 A-42688-4.b ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Court Service Unit Advisorv Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• Supervisor McGraw has nominated Gerald Curtiss and Roger Smith to serve another two-year term, if the committee remains active. Their terms will expire 3/22/90. Leaaue of Older Americans Advisory Board: Supervisor Robers has nominated Webb Johnson to serve another one-year term as County representative. His term will expire 3/31/89. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission• Supervisor Johnson has nominated Alice Gillespie to complete the unexpired term of William Pyles, Hollins Magisterial District. Her term will expire June 30, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~°~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE r i ,,,~~ Approved (x) Motion by: Denied ( ) Garrett Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers cc: File Court Service File League of Older Americans File Parks & Recreation Commission File Yes No Abs x x x x x r .~ ACTION # A-42688-4.c ITEM NUMBER =~' 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April. 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to allow the Bent Mountain Fire Sta- tion to be used by a civic organization COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Bent Mountain Woman's Club has requested permission to utilize the old Bent Mountain Fire Station for the purpose of conducting a yard sale and bake sale from May 18 to May 23, 1988. The organization has agreed to be responsible for any damage to the property as a result of these activities. In addition, the organization has agreed to execute a waiver releasing Roanoke County from any injuries or damages to persons and property as a result of these stated activities. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendation: l.. That the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents to accomplish this transaction on forms approved by the County Attorney. 2. That the Board favorably consider this authorization by resolution under the consent agenda. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Harry No Yes Abs Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney ACTION # A-42688-4.d ITEM NUMBER .~ ° .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: April 26, 1988 Proposed agreement with Appa_1_achian Power Company for the period July 1987 through June 1990 COUN'T'Y ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUNll: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This agreement establishes the electrical utility rate Lor ser.~vice to a1]. the County's locations set forth in "Exhibit A" attached to the document. This agreement covers the period from Ju]_y 1, 1987, through June 30, 1990, a period of thirty-six (36) months. As a result of a lower rate, the County will receive a credit for the difference between the old, which has been paid since July 1987, and the new rate. This agreement does not cover street lighting. It has been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorab]_y consider approval.. of this agreement and authorize the County Administrator to exe- cute it on behalf of the Board. Respectfully submitted, ~.r~ '1'V~ ,'`Mom _ Pau]_ M. Mahoney County Attorney --~ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Motion by: Lee Garrett/Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig Phillip Henry John Hubbard ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase 2-711-02-28299-0 2-711-02-28318-0 2-711-02-31371-0 2-711-05-27902-0 2-711-05-32622-0 2-711-05-32638-0 2-711-05-32700-0 2-711-OS-33181-0 •~~,. Stonebridge Park Tennis Courts Stonebridge Drive Vinton, VA Stonebridge Park Ballfields Stonebridge Drive Vinton, VA Soccer & Ballfield Lighting Stonebridge Park II Behind East Vinton Plaza State Route 24 Vinton, VA Delaney Court Pump State Route 761 (near Huff Lane) Roanoke, VA Mount Pleasant Park Tennis Court State Route 617 Roanoke, VA Mount Pleasant Park Ballfield lights Roanoke, VA 3170 Pitzer Road, S.E. Concession stand behind Mt. Pleasant Elem. School Roanoke, VA Mt. Pleasant School Library Pitzer Road, S.E. Roanoke, VA 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 19.9 KV 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 7200 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 2-711-05-33509-0-6 Mt. Pleasant Fire Dept. 120/240 V. Mt. Pleasant Blvd., S.E. 1-phase Roanoke, VA EX:iZBIT A Page 1~ Delivery Point & Meter Location Customer's pole. Customer's pole. Customer's primary pole. Top of mast. Adjacent to service point. Underground service to customer's pole. Top of private pole. Meter on private pole. Underground service to meter on west wall. Top of customer's mast at rear of building. Meter at base of mast. Service from APCo pole ~~303-2048. Overhead to rear of building. Account No. 2-711-05-34496-0 2-711-05-35255-0 2-711-OS-53296-0 2-711-05-53479-0 2-711-05-53661-0 2-711-05-56222-0 2-711-05-59410-0 2-711-OS-59760-0 2-711-05-59860-0 2-711-05-61112-0 2-711-05-65626-0 2-711-OS-6.5637-0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Service Location & Address Hampden Hills ~~1 Pump Meadowwood Road Roanoke, VA Hampden Hills ~~2 Pump * Woodway Road, S.E. Roanoke, VA Pinkard Court School Booker Road Roanoke, VA Southern Hills Pump B * U.S. Route 220 Roanoke, VA 220 Sewer Pump Station U.S. Route 220 Roanoke, VA Street Light Flintlock Circle, S.W. Roanoke, VA Hunting Hills Reservoir Upland Game Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA Highway Light Partridge Circle Roanoke, VA Highway Light Falcon Ridge Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA Hunting Hills ~~'1 Pump Fawndell Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA 5205 Franklin Road, S.W. Clearbrook Elem. School Roanoke, VA Clearbrook Public Safety Building U.S. Route 220 Roanoke, VA Delivery Voltage & Phase 120 /240 V, 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase I 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase I 120 V. 1-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 7200 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase EXHIBIT A Page 2 Delivery Point & Meter Location I Top of mast. ~ Top of mast. ~ Overhead to northwest wall. I Top of mast. Adjacent to service point. ~ Top of mast. I Overhead to customer's pole. ~ Top of mast. Overhead to customer's pole. Overhead to customer's pole. Top of mast. Primary meter pole at south end of ballfield. In C.T. cabinet in building. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase 2-711-06-26746-0 Personnel Office 3330 Valley Forge Ave., S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-26757-0 County Administration Office 3738 Brambleton Ave., S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-29670-0 Cave Spring Rescue Squad 3920 Mt. Vernon Dr., S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-31091-0 Library Headquarters 3131 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-33638-0 Cave Spring Firehouse 4212 Old Cave Spring Rd., SW Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-34641-0 Crestwood Park Pump * 3244 Ledgewood, S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-36323-0 Castle Rock ~~2 Booster Station 3041 Hereford Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-37125-0 Castle Rock ~~1 Booster Station Linda Lane Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-39911-0 Belle Meade Booster . St. Rt. 687 ;Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-39923-0 ~~''`" Belle Meade Well ~ Belle Meade, S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-06-44637-0 Kenwick Trail Booster Pump Overbill Trail, S.W. Roanoke, VA '-711-06-45792-0 Woodview Booster Pump * Penn Forest Blvd. Roanoke, VA 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 1120/208 V. 3-phase f 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 3-wire 120/240 V. 1-phase 3-wire 120/240 V. 1-phase 3-wire 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120 /240 V . 1-phase EXHIBIT A Page 3~- :~) Delivery Point & Meter Location At point of attachment at gable. Meter at left rear of building. Overhead to northwest corner . Overhead to south side of building. Pad mounted transformer at rear of building. Overhead to rear of build- ing. I Overhead to service mast. Meter on building. Overhead to meter pole. Underground to customer's manhole. Overhead to APCo pole. Meter on pole. On pump house. Overhead to service mast. Meter on building side. Top of mast. Top~of mast. EXHIBIT A ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase 2-711-06-45803-0 2-711-06-48056-0 2-711-06-50205-0 2-711-06-51656-0 2-711-06-53409-0 2-711-06-53478-0 2-711-06-55751-0 2-711-06-58615-0 2-711-06-58971-0 2-711-06-60121-0 2-711-07-26364-0 Penn Forest ~~1 Pump * 3330 Penn Forest Blvd., S.W Roanoke, VA Algoma Reservoir (Cathodic Protection) Londonderry Lane Roanoke, VA 5534 Cavalier Dr., S.W. * Roanoke, VA Cave Spring Tennis Courts 3714 Chaparral Dr., S.W. Roanoke, VA Booster Pump * 5900 Flamingo Rd., S.W. .Roanoke, VA Penn Forest Reservoir (Cathodic Protection) Oriole Lane, S.W. Roanoke, VA Booster Station 5582 Penguin Drive Roanoke, VA Grisso Water Pump Canterbury Park-Roselawn Rd. Roanoke, VA Highfield Water Pump * Roselawn at Highfield Rd. Roanoke, VA Layman Lawn Water Pump * Rosecrest Dr., S.W. Roanoke, VA Arlington Hills ~~2 Water Pump U.S. Rt. 221, RR 4, Box 403 Roanoke, VA 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 480 V. 3-phase 4-wire 120/240 V. 1-phase 3-wire 120/240 V. 1-phase 120 /240 V. 1-phase 711-07-26533-0 Arlington Forest Water Pump 120/240 V. U.S. Rt. 221, RR 4, Box 403 1-phase Roanoke, VA Page 4 •-__. Delivery Point & ''°"`~ Meter Location Top of mast. Underground service to meter on back side of tank. At meter on back of building. (Underground service). Overhead to meter pole. Top of mast. On tank. Underground. Meter on pedestal. Underground to building. C.T.'s in customer's switch panel. Meter on building side. Overhead to customer's service mast on pump house. Meter on building side. Overhead to service pole. Meter on building side. Overhead to service mast. Meter on building site. Overhead to service mast. Meter on building side. EXHIBIT A Account No. 2-711-07-27575-0 2-711-07-28783-0 2-711-07-28866-0 2-711-07-30816-0 2-711-07-32956-0 2-711-07-33777-0 2-711-07-34636-0 2-711-07-36688-0 2-711-07-42670-0 2-711-07-42691-1 2-711-07-42803-1 ?-711-07-50750-0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage & Address & Phase Arlington Hills ~~1 Pump * State Route 1683 Roanoke, VA Mt. Vernon Forest * Pump House Chatsworth Dr. (end of) Roanoke, VA 221 Sewer Pump Station * U.S. Route 221, South Roanoke, VA Scenic Hills Pump *. Scenic Hills Drive Roanoke, VA Brookwood Water Pump * State Rt. 690, N. of Ryan Lynn Road Roanoke, VA Homewood ~~1 Water Pump ~ * Steeplechase & Homewood Cir. Roanoke, VA Homewood ~~3 Water Pump * Roselawn Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA Long Ridge Pump/Tank * Sugar Loaf Drive north of Christy Lane Roanoke, VA 7847 Cedar Edge Rd. * Well on Lot 1 in Forest Edge Subdivision Roanoke, VA '7721 Forest Edge Dr. U.S. 221 (Well ~~5) Bent Mountain, VA 7969 Forest Edge Dr., SW (Well ~~3) Bent Mountain, VA 8487 Honeysuckle Rd. Bent Mountain, VA 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase Page 5 Delivery Point & Meter Location Outside wall of building. Overhead to service mast. Meter on building. Overhead to APCo pole. Meter on pole. Top of mast. Underground to building. Meter on building side. Overhead to customer`s service mast. Meter on building side. Underground from APCo pole to customer. Meter on well house. Underground to meter on building. Underground service from pedestal 346-66. Meter is on east side of building.,, Underground service to customer's pole. Metered at pole. Underground service to customer's pole. Metered at pole. Pedestal 346-83. Customer's pole. Delivery at top of pole. Metered at pole. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location .Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase 2-711-07-51319-0 2-711-08-46110-0 2-711-08-46131-0 2-711-08-46152-0 2-711-08-56117-0 2-711-08-59771-0 2-711-08-60825-0 2-711-08-63950-0 2-711-08-77538-0 2-711-08-82556-0 :'',~; 4. 2-711-08-82600-0 2-711-08-82620-0 Bent Mountain Firehouse U.S. 221 Bent Mountain, VA Starkey Treatment Plant St. Rt. 613 Roanoke, VA Starkey Treatment Plant St. Rt. 613 Roanoke, VA Starkey Treatment Plant * St. Rt. 613 Roanoke, VA Bent Mtn. Tennis Courts U.S. Route 221 Bent Mountain, VA Wooded Acres Pump State Route 705 Salem, VA Blackwood Drive (Rt. 1117) beside Salem's reservoir yin Robin Hood Park Subdivision Transmitter for Radio Skycoe Drive Salem, VA Andrew Lewis Place Pump Ellen Drive ,Salem, VA Shamrock Park Concession Stand - U.S. Route 11 Salem, VA Glenvar Library U.S. Route 11 Salem, VA Fort Lewis Fire Dept. Septic System 3915 W. Main Street Salem, . VA 1120/240 v. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase f 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase * 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/208 V. 3-phase * 1120/208 V. 1-phase EXHIBIT A Page 6 ~_ . " `., Delivery Point & Meter Location Top of mast. Top of mast. Top of mast. Top of mast. Overhead to customer's pole. Meter on customer's pole. On pump house. At meter base mounted on the east side of building, facing Blackwood Drive. Pole ~~274-136 Top of private pole. Top of private pole. Meter on house. Underground to south wall. Underground to rear of building. On building. Customer's pole on left side of Fire Dept. Bldg. EXHIBIT A ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pale 7 Delivery ~'_~~-.' Service Location Voltage Delivery Point & Account No. & Address & Phase Meter Location 2-711-08-82623-0 Fort Lewis Fire Dept. 120/208 V. Underground service to U.S. Route 11 3-phase west wall. Salem, VA 2-711-08-82645-0 McVitty Park 120/240 V. At top of riser pole. Concession Stand 1-phase On private building. U.S. Route 11 Salem, VA 2-711-08-83170-0 2-711-08-83624-0 2-711-08-84429-0 2-711-08-84802-0 2-711-08-85938-0 2-711-09-28436-0 2-711-09-29831-0 2-711-09-29882-1 2-711-09-31086-0 '11-09-34012-0 Glenvar East ~~2 Pump * 387 Ivie Circle Salem, VA Glenvar East ~~3 Pump * Dot Circle/Glenvar East Salem, VA Parks & Rec. - Athletic Field St. Rt. 828 - Glenvar Courts Salem, VA Parks & Recreation Dept. Glenvar Ball Park at Elementary School Salem, VA Glenvar Booster Pump * Ingal Blvd. Salem, VA 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase . 120/240 V. 1-phase 7200 V. 1-phase '~ 120/240 V. 3-phase Booster water pump. on * 277/480 V. Route 460 four miles west 3-phase of Salem. Route 3 Salem, VA Glenn Forest Pump * 120/240 V. Yale Drive 1-phase Salem, VA Water pump * 120/240 V. Dogwood Avenue (near Edgewood 1-phase Salem, VA Big Hill Water Tank Control * .120/240 V. Viewpoint Avenue 1-phase Salem, VA Campbell Hills ~k3 Pump * 120/240 V. U.S. Route 11 1-phase Salem, VA On pump house. Underground service to meter on building. Top of private pole. Top of private pole. Meter on customer's pole. Overhead to pump house. Meter on house. Top of mast. Meter on outside of building. Overhead to pump house. Meter on house. At top of mast at well house. Meter on house at base of mast. Top of private pole. Meter on private pole. At pump building. On pump building. EXHIBIT A ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 8 Delivery ~.,„ -~ Service Location Voltage Delivery Point & Account No. & Address & Phase Meter Location 2-711-09-34261-0 2-711-09-42160-0 2-711-09-72799-0 2-711-09-72815-0 2-711-09-72831-0 2-711-09-72982-0 2-711-09-73399-0 2-711-10-26110-0 2-711-10-27620-0 2-711-10-38447-0 Campbell Hills ~~2 Pump U.S. Route 11 & Roanoke Rive Salem, VA U.S. 11 - Industrial Park Sewer Pump Salem, VA Recreation Center 686 Ogden Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA Recreation Center 686 Ogden Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA Ogden Center Tennis Courts '686 Ogden Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA Pump (Tanglewood Booster) Ogden Road Roanoke, VA Avenham Reservoir Pump * Avenham Ave. Roanoke, VA Green Valley - Ball Field 3838 Overdale Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA i Ogden Sewer Metering Station Ogden Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA Sewer Pump Station * (Tanglewood Mall Parking) 4141 Avenham Ext., S.W. Roanoke, VA 1120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120 /240 V . 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase ~ 120/240 V. 3-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 2-711-10-41910-0 Booster Pump * 120/240 V. (Electric Valve) 1-phase Starkey Rd. Roanoke, VA Underground to pump. Meter on cabinet. At top of mast. On pump building. Overhead service from pole 301-3521. Meter on north side of building. Overhead service from pole 301-3521. Meter on north side of building.. Underground secondary service from pole 301-3521. Meter is by fence on south side of court. Underground to customer's meter/service pole. Overhead to customer's service/metering pole. Overhead to meter pole. Overhead to APCo pole. Customer's meter pedestal. Overhead to customer's service pole. Meter on pole. Outside wall of pump house. EXHIBIT A Account No. 2-711-10-41921-0 2-711-10-42072-0 2-711-10-42474-0 2-711-10-43776-0 2-711-10-46356-0 2-711-10-50855-0 2-711-10-52285-06 2-711-10-54257-0" 2-711-10-55582-0 2-711-10-56282-0 2-711-10-57311-0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage & Address & Phase Hunting Hills Booster Pump Hunting Hills Roanoke, VA Wheeler Pump * State Route 633 Roanoke, VA Chesterfield Court Well * Chesterfield Court Roanoke, VA Long Pump * Starkey Road Roanoke, VA Pine Mountain * Well/Water (Adjacent to Woodland Dr.) State Route 875, RR 5 Roanoke, VA Pump * 4560 Somerset St., S.W. Roanoke, VA Penn Forest Park/Ballfields Merriman Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA Merriman Rd. Sewer Pump * Station 6006 Merriman Rd., S.W. (Cartwright) Roanoke, VA Starkey ~~2 Well * Corner of Cartwright Dr. and R.R. 4 Roanoke, VA Starkey Well ~~1 * St. Rt. 419, R.R. 4 Roanoke, VA Garst Mill Sewer * Metering Station Garst Mill & Hollowdale Rd. Roanoke, VA 120/208 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 7200 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase Page 9 ~.. w?. Delivery Point & Meter Location Underground service. Meter on back of pump house. Top of mast. Top of mast. Outside wall of pump house. Top of mast on building. On side of building. Underground service. Meter on back of pump house. Overhead to customer's service pole. Metering at pole 349-1083. Top of mast inside fence. On mast. Overhead to customer's mast at pump house. Meter on outside. Overhead to customer's mast at pump house. Meter on outside. Overhead to customer's service pole. Meter on service pole. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase EXYIBIT A Page 10 Z` Delivery Point & Meter Location 2-711-10-58851-0 Tennis Court 120/240 V. Overhead to customer's Garst Mill Park 1-phase service. Halevan Rd., S.W. Roanoke, VA 2-711-10-58862-0 Southwoods Well ~~1 * 120/240 V. Underground to customer`s Halevan Rd., S.W. 3-phase pole. Roanoke, VA Meter cabinet. 2-711-10-58874-0 Southwoods Well ~~2 * 120/240 V. Underground from pole Halevan Road 3-phase 4300-6032 and terminating Roanoke, VA ~ on customer's meter pole. 2-711-10-64670-0 Western Hills - * 120/240 V. On pump house. Wyndale Pump 3-phase Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-24935-0 Castle Rock Pump 2-A * 120/240 V. Overhead to north wall. Brahma Road, S.W. 1-phase Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-24968-0 Castle Rock Pump ~~3 * 120/240 V. Overhead to north wall. Castle Rock Rd., S.W. 1-phase Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-26991-0 Castle Rock Sewer Pump * 120/240 V. On pump house. Station 1-phase 3120 Galloway Dr. Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-30879-0-2 Cresthill Well ~~1 ~ * 120/240 V. Overhead to meter pole. 4543 Cordell Dr., S.W. 3-phase Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-32011-0 The Pines Water Pump * 120/240 V. Overhead to customer's Glen Heather at Roxbury Lane 3-phase meter/service pole. Roanoke, VA Service pole ~~300-143. 2-711-11-35229-0 Oak Grove Reservoir * 120/240 V. ~ Overhead to customer s (Cathodic Protection) 1-phase mast at pump house. Glen Heather Dr., S.W. Meter on side of building. Roanoke, VA 2-711-11-35241-0 Wyndale Water Pump * 120/240 V. Overhead to meter on Windsor Hills, S.W. '3-phase building. Roanoke, VA -711-11-53239-0 Water Pump ~~8 * 120/240 V. Overhead to service mast. Keagy Road, S.W. 3-phase Meter on building side. Roanoke., VA 2-711-II-54803-0 Keagy Road * 120/240 V. On pump house. Hidden Valley - Well ~~7 3-phase Roanoke, VA EX:iZBIT A ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage Account No. & Address & Phase 2-711-11-56779-0-8 2-711-11-56884-0-0 2-711-11-57454-0 2-711-11-58348-0 2-711-11-58359-0 2-711-12-29571-0 2-711-12-29622-0 2-711-12-29862-0 2-711-12-58735-0 2-711-12-58752-0 '-=~>. 2-711-12-58769-0 State Route 692 - ~ Hidden Valley - Well ~~5 Salem, VA State Route 692 ~ Hidden Valley - Well ~~6 Salem, VA Elbert Drive - Booster Pump ~ Sugar Loaf Highlands Roanoke, VA Hidden Valley Well ~~2 ~ Keagy Road Roanoke, VA Sugar Loaf Mountain ~ Hidden Valley, Well ~~4 Roanoke, VA Sewer Meter Station. 4902 Hidden Valley School Rd. Roanoke, VA Hidden Valley Park Concession Stand 4902 Hidden Valley Dr. Roanoke, VA Farmingdale Pump ~ 5717 Club Lane ~ Roanoke, VA 1206 Kessler Mill Road (North of I-81 underpass) Salem, VA Gas pumps at Service Building 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem, VA Service Center 1206 Kessler Mill Rd. Salem, VA 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 1120 /240 V . 3-phase L120/240 V. 3-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120 /240 V . 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 480 V. 3-phase 2-711-12-58787-0 Service Center ~ 120/240 V. 1206 Kessler Mill Rd. 1-phase Salem, VA Page 11 Delivery Poin & Meter Location On pump house. On pump house. On pump house. Underground to building meter. On pump house. Overhead to customer's service pole. Meter on pole. Delivered at service mast at end of building. Meter on end of building. On pump house. At top of customer's temporary service pole. Meter on customer's pole. Top of mast on building. Meter on building. Top of mast on building. Meter on APCo pole. Top of mast. Meter on pump house. EX:iIBIT A ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 12 Delivery Service Location. Voltage Delivery Point & Account No. & Address & Phase Meter Location 2-711-12-63297-0 2-711-12-67935-0 2-711-12-71914-0 2-711-13-39725-0 2-711-13-39737-0 2-711-13-45956-0 2-711-13-48924-0 2-711-13-53934-0 2-711-13-54333-0 2-711-13-57492-0 2-711-13-63057-0 2-711-13-66529-0 2-711-13-67200-0 Parks & Recreation Dept. Whispering Pines Ball Park Salem, VA Fire Station ~~10 Bradshaw Rd. Salem, VA Catawba Community Center Old Catawba School Catawba, VA Recreation Headquarters 5929 Cove Road, N.W. .Roanoke, VA Maintenance Building 5929 Cove Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA Green Ridge Meter Station * Arcadia Drive Roanoke, VA Kings Arms Sewer Meter Station 5310 Cove Rd. Roanoke, VA Eveningwood Lane * North Lakes - Well ~~4 Roanoke, VA North Lakes - Well ~~3 Roanoke, VA North Lakes - Well ~~5 Green Ridge Rd., N.W. and Loch Haven Rd. Roanoke, VA Brooklawn ~~3 Pump Woodlands (Int. C-628 & C-629 Roanoke, VA 17200 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase Starmount - Well ~kl * 120/240 V, 1121-A Nover Avenue 1-phase Roanoke, VA Starmount - We11 ~~2 * 120/240 V. Dwight Hills 3-phase 1247-A Vivian Ave . , I~1.W . Roanoke, VA Top of private pole. Meter on customer's pole. Overhead to southwest wall. Top of mast on east wall. On outside of east wall. Overhead to southeast wall. Overhead to east wall. At top of private pole. On private pole. Top of private pole. Meter on private pole. On pump house. On pump house. Underground service off APCo riser pole into meter on rear of building. Top of private pole. On pump house. On pump house. Overhead service to building. Meter on building. EX:iIBIT n Account No. 2-711-13-68849-0 2-711-14-29231-0 2-711-14-29875-0 2-711-14-31245-0 2-711-14-31672-0-3 2-711-14-38240-0 2-711-14-48224-0 2-711-14-66904-0 2-711-14-69447-0 2-711-14-69470-0 2-711-14-73241-0 2-711-14-73416-0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage & Address & Phase Pump House * 6400 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke, VA Deer Run Water Pump * Starmount Ave., N.W. Roanoke, VA North-11 Fire Station 7401 Barrens Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA Tinker Knoll Well House 203-A Knoll Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA Public Library - Hollins Branch 6624 Peters Creek Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA Ardmore Pump * Fair Oaks Rd. Roanoke, VA Peters Creek Sewer Metering station Cove Rd. & Rt. 117 Roanoke, VA Well at North Lakes. * 4991-A North Lakes Drive Roanoke, VA Northside Tennis Courts Northridge Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA North Lakes #6 Pump 4940 Northridge Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA 5600 Peters Creek Rd., NW * Roanoke, VA Public Safety Center (Old Southview Voc. School) 3568 Peters Creek Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA 120/240 V. 1-phase 1120 /240 V . 3-phase 1120/208 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/208 V. 3-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/208 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 120/240 V. 3-phase Page 13 .1.. -` Delivery Point & Meter Location Customer's mast. Outside wall of pump house. Underground service to well house. Underground service to west side of building. Overhead. Meter on building. Padmounted transformer at rear of building. On pump house. At top of private pole. On private pole. At meter on side of pump house. (Underground service.) Underground service to customer's pole. Top of riser pole. On pump house. On pump house. Overhead to east wall. EX:iIBi: n ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 14 Delivery ~''~ '` -..L--,..-.:..:a Service Location Voltage Delivery Point & Account No. & Address & Phase Meter Location 2-711-14-73501-0-2 2-711-15-42296-0 2-711-15-56779-0 2-711-16-40161-0 2-711-16-40664-0 2-711-16-40987-0 2-711-16-43428-0 2-711-19-50181-0 2-711-19-50519-0 2-711-19-51042-0 2-711-19-51549-0 -711-19-52565-0 Public Safety Center (Old Southview Voc. School) 3568 Peters Creek Rd., N.W. .Roanoke, VA North-11 Sewage * Meter Station 4411 Hollins Rd., NE Roanoke, VA Mt. View Pump * Garman Road Mountain View Farm, Hollins Carvins Meadow Water Pump 601 Carvin Street Hollins, VA Walrond Park Walrond Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA Friendship Lane Booster Station Carvin Street, N.E. Roanoke, VA Hollins Water Pump State Rt. 648, R.R. 1 Hollins, VA LaBellevue Well ~~7 * Denise Circle, N..E. Roanoke, VA Metal Reservoir * LaBellevue Rd. Roanoke, VA 2042 Wesvan Drive (Pump) Roanoke, VA LaBellevue ~~6 Water Pump * East Ruritan Road Roanoke, VA Summit Ridge Booster Pump Summit Ridge Road LaBellevue Subdivision Roanoke, VA 277/480 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 119,900 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase Into C.T. cabinet inside building. Meter on outside of building. Customer's pole. On pump house. Overhead service to customer's pole. Meter on pole. Customer`s pole. Underground service to well house. Overhead service to customer's pole. Meter on pole. Underground service to well house. Overhead to customer's pole . Overhead to customer's service pole from APCo pole ~~207-299. Underground service to well house. Underground service to customer's pole. Account No. 2-711-19-52801-0 2-711-19-53055-0 Z-711-19-57817-0 2-711-20-23898-0 2-711-20-24305-0 2-711-20-29076-0 2-711-20-30017-0 2-711-20-31600-0 ~ 2-711-20-31651-0 ~ 2-711-21-35529-0 I 2-711-21-35895-0 * Denotes wa ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Delivery Service Location Voltage & Address & Phase Pump Station - Valve house 2857 Summit Ridge Rd. Roanoke, VA LaBellevue ~k3 Water Pump Coachman Circle Roanoke, VA 4635 Huntridge Rd. * Roanoke, VA Wm. Byrd Jr. High Athletic Field Washington Ave. Vinton, VA Gearhart Park Recreation Building Highland Road Vinton, VA Vinton Recreation Center 304 Meadow Street Vinton, VA Vinton Branch Library E. Washington Avenue Vinton, VA Vinton Center - Tennis Court 814-B Washington Ave., E. Vinton, VA Vinton Center Little League Lts.-Ballpark 814 E. Washington Ave. Vinton, VA Old Craig Ave. Elem. School 900 Chestnut Street Vinton, VA Basketball Court - Gladetown Park 105 Craig Avenue Vinton, VA ar pumping, sewage pumping, a 1120/240 V. 1-phase 1120/240 V. 1-phase 1120 /240 V . 3-phase 112,470 V. 3-phase 1120/240 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 3-phase 120/208 V. 3-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase 120/240 V. 1-phase EX:iIBI: A Page 15 ._.L-Y - .~°.~. Delivery Point & Meter Location Meter pole 5 feet from pedestal 207-9-209 at corner of Lot 16. Overhead to customer's pole. Underground to meter on northwest side of building. Customer's pole. Rear of building. Served from APCo transformer pole to customer's masthead at northwest corner of building. From APCo transformer pole to metering on rear of building. Padmounted transformer north side of building. Customer's pole. Customer's pole. Customer's underground service. APCo pole ~~279-1696. On customer's pole. /or sewage d~.sposal service. ACTION # A-42688-4.e ITEM NUMBER '~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Memorandum of Understanding between the Virginia Department of Emergency Services and the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,,( ~~Ct-rr~rn,c.~ ~~~u~ ~tic.~,rn~A ~ (~. 0 BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Program, Chapter_ 3.5 of Title 44 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, was enacted in 1987 in order to coordinate hazardous materials training emergency response programs between the state and local political subdivisions. This Program is a response to federal mandates in "the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986" contained in Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"). The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department is directly involved in this program by providing immediate response capability at the Level II or defensive tactics stage for emergency hazardous materials accidents. This Memorandum of Understanding will a_1_low the Fire and Rescue Department to receive a grant of $1,500 for the purchase of equipment to be used in Level II responses and to receive training in all Level I and Level II response techniques from the Department of Emergency Services (I)ES). Further, this agreement wi.11 put in place a mechanism for the County to be reimbursed for costs associated with a response in assistance of DES as provided by State Code Section 44-146.18.1(3). ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: STAFF RECOMMENDA'1' I ON .(:t i.s recommended that the Board authorize the County Admin- istrator to execute this Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the County and for the Treasurer to accept any grant from the . ~~ ,.~.,. Department of Emergency Services and to pay out such funds re- ceived for the purchase of defensive equipment by the Fire and Rescue Departments in accordance with state guidelines. This action may be taken under the Board's consent agenda. Respectfully submitted, -~.~; ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VO'L'E Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney Tommy Fuqua ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1988. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Dominion Concentration Sovran Savings Southwest Virginia Savings & Loans - CD Dominion Bank - RA Signet Bank - BA Craigie Inc. - BA Signet Bank - CP Sovran Bank - Government Fund SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~/ Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer 4,707,583.01 174.67 100,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,179.17 2,976,565.00 994,905.56 101,086.78 APPROVED BY: 1~~ Elm r C. Hodge County Administrator - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VOTE - - - - - - - - ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle _ Garret _ Johnson _ McGraw _ Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-8 CONGRATULATING THE STATE AAU CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM, THE GLENVAR-SALEM ALL-STARS WHEREAS, the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars basketball team, composed of ten and eleven year old boys from Glenvar, North Roanoke County and Salem, recently won the State AAU Championship, in Staunton, Virginia, compiling a 6 - 1 overall record; and WHEREAS, the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars, coached by Larry Woolwine and assisted by Joe Duffy, Wayne Atkins, Toby Garst and David Simmons, will play in the national AAU finals beginning July 23, 1988, in Orlando, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia congratulates and commends the following members of the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars for their outstanding athletic achievement: Matt Atkinson Christopher Brammer John Duffy Matthew Biggs Jason Darnall Steven Edwards Kevin Garst Cory Moses Shae Simmons Brian Hill Bryan Monroe Matthew Woolwine and further, expresses its strong support that the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars will be victorious at the national AAU tournament in Orlando, Florida. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon a unanimous voice vote. A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations ITEM NO. ""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE STATE AAU CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM, THE GLENVAR-SALEM ALL-STARS WHEREAS, the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars basketball team, composed of ten and eleven year old boys from Glenvar, North Roanoke County and Salem, recently won the State AAU Championship, in Staunton, Virginia, compiling a 6 - 1 overall record; and WHEREAS, the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars, coached by Larry Woolwine and assisted by Joe Duffey, Wayne Atkins, Toby Garst and David Simmons, will play in the national AAU finals beginning July 23, 1988, in Orlando, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia congratulates and commends the following members of the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars for their outstanding athletic achievement: Matt Atkinson Christopher Brammer John Duff y Kevin Garst Cory Moses Shae Simmons Matthew Biggs Jason Darnall Steven Edwards Brian Hill Bryan Monroe Matthew Woolwine and further, expresses its strong support that the Glenvar-Salem All-Stars will be victorious at the national AAU tournament in Orlando, Florida. ~~'~~~q ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET The County of Roanoke will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on Tuesday, April 26, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. The purpose of this hearing is to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1988-89 summarized below. All interested citizens, groups, senior citizens, and organizations representing the interest of senior citizens are encouraged to attend and to submit coinnents. SUNIl~IARY OF PROPOSID 1988-89 BUDGET COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Source Amount General Fund: General Property Taxes $ 37,237,302 Other Local Taxes 11,840,602 Permits, Fees, and Licenses 389,282 Fines and Forfeitures 162,000 Charges for Services 150,509 Miscellaneous 286,579 Recovered Costs 210,000 Commonwealth 6,944,484 Non-Revenue 576,538 Beginning Balance 500,000 $ 58,297,296 Debt Service Fund 5,359,292 Youth Haven II 318,716 Internal Service Fund 1,009,074 Capital Projects Fund 727,160 Utility Fund 7,812,382 Garage Fund 248,750 Fee Classes - Recreation 183,159 School Operating Fund 55,212,930 School Bus Fund 1,125,000 Cafeteria Fund 2,564,812 Federal Programs Fund 1,151,011 School Capital Improvements Fund 640,500 Literary Loan Fund 2,981,000 Textbook Fund 425,633 Regional Special Education Fund 678,159 Gross Budget $138,734,874 Less: Interfund Transfers (32,743,464) Net Budget 5105.991.410 ,... _ EXPENDITURES Source Amount General Fund: General Government Administration $ 965,825 Constitutional Officers 7,635,001 Judicial Ad~tinistration 166,905 Management Services 2,439,275 Public Safety 2,442,706 Community Services 4,045,203 Human Services 6,597,570 Transfer to Schools 26,466,000 Transfer to Capital Outlay 677,160 Transfer to Debt Service 4,823,558 Transfer to Other Funds 392,076 Contingent Balance 60,000 Miscellaneous 1,586,017 $ 58,?_97,296 Debt Service Fund 5,359,292 Youth Haven II 318,716 Internal Service Fund 1,009,074 Capital Projects Fund 727,160 Utility Fund 7,812,382 Garage Fund 248,750 Fee Classes - Recreation 183,159 School Operating Fund 55,212,930 School Bus Fund 1,125,000 Cafeteria Fund 2,564,812 Federal Programs Fund 1,151,011 School Capital Improvements Fund 640,500 Literary Loan Fund 2,981,000 Textbook Fund 425,633 Regional Special Education Fund 678,159 Gross Budget $138,734,874 Less: Interfund Transfers (32,743,464) Net Budget 105.991,410 'C CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY, I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF TAP TO REPORT TO YOU ON OUR PROGRAMS Af~~D TO URGE `LOUR CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR, WHILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR AVJAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--HEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY OP TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE: 12 JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR SOB CLUB, OAT PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM, 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE. 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREN AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO STREPJGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ` ASSISTANCE FOOD, CLOTHII`JG, UTILIT'~ PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 4$ HOMES OF LO6V-INCOME:AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS WERE 6VEATHERIZED, HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 1$ ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAMS SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEP~ONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY, EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS WAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED $353,140, USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO $706,2$0 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,628, WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE MAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS, FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 4O~ SINCE 19$0. YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS. YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS. LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA. WE LJERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDEPJTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP As A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. g ` .` CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 _ GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY. I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF TAP TO REPORT TO-YOU ON OUR PROGRAMS APiD TO URGE YOUR CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST, FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR. 6~HILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR AWAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--HEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY o~ TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE: 12 JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEV,~LOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR SOB CLUB, O.1T PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM. 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE. 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREN) AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO ,r ` STREfdGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN. LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ` ASSISTANCE FOOD, CLOTHING, UTILITY PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 4$ HOMES OF LObV-INCOME:AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS V~ERE LVEATHERIZED. HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHGL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 1$ ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH. ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAMS SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS. TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY. EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS HJAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED X353,140. USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO X706,280 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,62$, WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE 1~JAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 40~ SINCE 1980. YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA. FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL A ` REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA, WE LJERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISOR S IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDEPdTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, LSE NEED YOUR SUPPORT, I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP As A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION, CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 GOOD EVENING. MY NAME I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERT' PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT TAP TO REPORT TO-YOU ON OUR IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF ~'. I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF PROGRAMS AJ~D TO URGE YOUR CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR, ~~HILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR AV~JAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--BEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY OE TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE; 12 JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEV.~LOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR .10B CLUB, OJT PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM. 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE, 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREP~ AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO STREPJGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN. OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN. LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE (FOOD, CLOTHING, UTILITY PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 48 HOMES OF LOVJ-INCOME:AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS WERE 6VEATHERIZED. HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHGL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 18 ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH. ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAMS SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS. TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY. EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS WAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED $353,140. USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO $706,280 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,628. WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE WAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 40~ SINCE 1980, YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA. FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL A REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS. YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS. LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA. WE 6JERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP AS A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF TAP TO REPORT TO-YOU ON OUR PROGRAMS AID TO URGE YOUR CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR, G~HILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR AVJAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--HEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY OF TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE; 12 JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEV,~LOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR SOB CLUB, OJT PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM. 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE. 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREN AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO -- STREfdGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN. OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN. LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOOD, CLOTHII`JG, UTILITY PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 48 HOMES OF LObV-INCOME AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS WERE WEATHERIZED. HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 18 ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH. ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAMS SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS. TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY. EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS WAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED $353,140, USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO $706,280 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,628. WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE I~JAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS, FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 4O~ SINCE 1980. YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA. FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL r A REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS, YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS. LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA. WE L~dERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, 4~E NEED YOUR SUPPORT. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP As A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION, ~_ CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY. I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF TAP TO REPORT TO YOU ON OUR PROGRAMS AP:D TO URGE YOUR CONTI~;UED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR. G~HILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR A~JAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--BEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY o~ TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE; 12 JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEV.~LOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR .10B CLUB, OJT PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM. 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE, 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREN AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO r STREPJGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN. OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN. LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE (FOOD, CLOTHING, UTILITY PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 48 HOMES OF LO~J-INCOME:AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS NJERE 6VEATHERIZED. HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 1$ ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH. ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAf~1S SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS. TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY, EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS NJAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED X353,140. USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO $706,280 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,628, WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE IVAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS, FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 40~ SINCE 1980, YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA. FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS. YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS. LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA. WE 6JERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDEPJTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, LSE NEED YOUR SUPPORT. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP As A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION, ,, ~, -- , CABELL'S SPEECH ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET HEARING APRIL 12, 1988 GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CABELL BRAND AND, AS YOU KNOW, I SERVE AS A ROANOKE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY. I AM PROUD TO HAVE SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF TAP'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS SINCE THE AGENCY'S FOUNDING IN 1965. I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND STAFF OF TAP TO REPORT TO YOU ON OUR PROGRAMS A~~D TO URGE `(OUR CONTINUED FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REFUNDING REQUEST. FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO RECAP FOR YOU SOME OF THE SERVICES TAP HAS PROVIDED TO ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR, WHILE SEVERAL OF THE LOCALITIES WE SERVE LIE T00 FAR AVJAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF TAP'S PROGRAMS, ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVE THE SERVICES OF ALL OF OUR COMPONENTS--HEAD START, YOUTH SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY OUTREACH, HUMAN RESOURCES AND FOODBANK. YOU EACH RECEIVED A COPY o~ TAP'S ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THAT REPORT INCLUDE; 1Z JOBS GENERATED FOR CLIENTS THROUGH JOB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OF OUR .)OB CLUB, OJT PROGRAM AND OFFENDER SERVICES PROGRAM. 5 PARTICIPANTS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH AND ADULT DROPOUTS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THE GED TEST AND RECEIVED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY CERTIFICATE. 36 PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS PARTICIPATED IN TAP'S HEAD START PROGRAM. ROANOKE COUNTY IS SERVED BY HOME START, IN WHICH A HOME VISITOR PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES TO CHILDREN) AT HOME AND ALSO PROVIDES TRAINING FOR THE PARENTS TO STREPJGTHEN THEIR ROLE AS THE PRIMARY EDUCATORS OF THEIR CHILDREN. OUR NEW VINTON HEAD START CENTER ALSO SERVES ROANOKE COUNTY CHILDREN. LAST YEAR 144 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES RECEIVED EMERGENCY ` ASSISTANCE FOOD, CLOTHING, UTILITY PAYMENTS); HOUSING COUNSELORS AIDED 27 ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILIES WITH EMERGENCY SHELTER OR RENT MONEY; 48 HOMES OF LObV-INCOME AND ELDERLY COUNTY RESIDENTS VlERE 6VEATHERIZED. HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF PROVIDED ALCOHGL AND SUBSTANCE-• ABUSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING TO 18 ADULTS AND 199 YOUTH. ALL TOTALLED, TAP PROGRAMS SERVED 324 RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND IMPACTED UPON A TOTAL OF 910 FAMILY MEMBERS. TAP'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT DEMONSTRATES THAT OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOT ONLY OF BENEFIT TO INDIVIDUAL COUNTY RESIDENTS BUT THAT THEY ALSO CONTRIBUTE DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY'S ECONOMY. EACH ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENT WHO EARNS V~lAGES IN A PROGRAM, OR WHO IS PLACED ON AN UNSUBSIDIZED JOB, OR WHO IS EMPLOYED BY TAP RECEIVES INCOME WHICH GENERATES ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. DURING OUR LAST PROGRAM YEAR, DIRECT CLIENT INCOME PLUS INCOME TO COUNTY RESIDENTS EMPLOYED BY TAP TOTALLED $353,140. USING THE CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF 2, THAT TRANSLATES INTO $706,280 IN LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND ESTIMATED LOCAL TAX REVENUE OF $70,628. WE AT TAP RECOGNIZE THE BUDGET PROBLEMS FACING LOCALITIES IN THE I~JAKE OF POLICY CHANGES AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF TAP'S CORE PROGRAMMING HAVE BEEN REDUCED OVER 40~ SINCE 1980, YET TAP CONTINUES TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING TO PROVIDE QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR THE LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF OUR AREA. FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE LOCALITIES IN RESPONSE TO OUR ANNUAL REQUESTS, WHILE COMPRISING ONLY A SMALL PART OF OUR TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET, ARE NONETHELESS ESSENTIAL! THE MAJORITY OF TAP'S FUNDING STILL COMES IN THE FORM OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE GRANTS-- GRANTS WHICH, MORE AND MORE, REQUIRE LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS. YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ACTUALLY ENABLES TAP TO APPLY FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND PRIVATE MONIES NEEDED TO OPERATE OUR PROGRAMS. LAST YEAR, I AM PROUD TO SAY, TAP RECEIVED FUNDING FROM EVERY LOCALITY IN OUR SERVICE AREA. WE 6JERE PRIVILEDGED TO BE A LINE ITEM IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY BUDGET. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN 1965 RECEIVED UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS. IN ORDER TO CONTINUE OUR HISTORY OF PROVIDING QUALITY SERVICES TO LOW INCOME RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TAP As A BUDGET LINE ITEM AND TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OUR 1988 REQUEST OF $38,189. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. L/~8 - ~ COMMT7TEE FoR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, INC. ~'. O. Box 2001 O FioANOK E ~ VA 2 4018-001 a SUGGESTED COMMENTS TO ftiOANOKE COUNT"Y BOARD OF SUF'FRVISORS APRIL 26, 1988 AGFwNGA ITCM N. 488-1 WHY GIG FtiDANOKE` COUNTY COMMIT TO A TWF_:.LVF_ MILLION COLLAR RAG I O SYSTEM WITH SF'F•_C I F I CAT I ONS WF:2 TTEN SO AS TO F_XCLUGE ALL. f:~UT ONE: 'P'OTENTIAL SUF'F'L I ER? WITH ABOUT . 4 MILLION COLLARS ALRF_AGY SPENT ~ Wt-IAT I S THE T I METAr~LE FOE: BUYING "fHE3 REMA I M I NG PIECES OF THE SYSTF..M? WHY GIG THE' COUN"TY AGREF_ TO FAY FULL LIST P'RICE' FOE: E:VEFcY TRANSISTOR ANG SWITCH IN THAT ~YSTFM, RATHER THAN NEGOTIA7F" EVEN A STANGAF;G VOLUME C'! I SCOUN'T? WHY SHOULD IT COST THF..: RUGGFTE~G ~105~ OOO NEXT YF..AR TO MAINTAIN A F~RAhJD NF'W RADIO Sl'STr'M? WHY GOES THE SYSTEM NOW IN F'LACE NOT COVEr.F; ALL THE COUNTY? THERE HAVE E~F-.EN SEVEF:AL INSTANCEIS Rr"CF_NTLY WHERE COUNT"V F'E=R50NNEL COULD SF?E EACH OTHf=R~ E~UT COULC~ NOT COMMUNICATE 4JITH EACH OTHF_F; OVF_R THIS Nr'W ~~EMF,.RGENCY~~ F;AGIO SYSTEM. WHY ARE FIRE= ANG F; F. SC Ur VEH I CLrS F>E I NG EGtU I F'F'FG WITH CELLUI..AF: TFLFF'HONEiS WHEN THE OLD RADIO SYSTEMS IF F'ROF'E?RLY MAINTAINE=Gv COULD HAVE C~ONT THE= JOB? WHY GIG THE' COUNTY SF'F:"NG OVER FIVE MILLION ALREAGV FOR E-911 WHRN SALEM GOT 7HEIFF SYSTEM FULLY OPERATIONAL FOR ~vc.1Ov000 ANG f\OANOK E CITY USED L1=.'SS THAhi ONE MILLION COMF'LET I NG THE I Ry? I WOULD AF'PRE'C I ATE:: YOUR WRITTEN F:E:SFONSE TO THESE FISCAL L'iUESTI ONS. Wit.i.inM~~Ah~~z,~w~s. iii 4504 S rnlzKev Ronu. Sui/rre 300 ROA NOKii. VIRGINIA 24014 April 26, 1988 ~o3.9s9-~zys TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors IN RE: Proposed Meals Tax Admittedly, I am self-interested as a principal in a food service establishment, however, this notwithstandiny, I oppose this onerous, sectorally-discriminating meals tax - my ulterior interest being our Lord and the consequent Judeo-Christian principles upon which this great country was founded. Even superficially the concept of such a narrowly-defined financial imposition borders on blatant taxation without representation, if not a myopic and pusillanimouG "cake-walk" down a path of .least resistance. Is due process served when by mere fiat the legislature can grant five people (albeit unanimity requirea) discretion over the cost of every away from home meal without any salient public rejoinder permitted?! Does it take more than elementary grade history to recall our fabled and notorious "Boston Tea Party"?! Which one of the 5 "meals tax czars" can truly identify wit h the impact of a four percent additional burden on sales - of an increase even dwarfing our recently attained propitious inflation rate - much to the credit of forward-thinking and equanimious- minded economists such as Alan Reynolds of Polyconomics, Inc. in Morristown, N.J.. He, for one, has clearly related that "...it is an illusion to pretend one can tax 'consumption' without taxing production. The whole purpose of taxes is to grab a share of production for uses determined by politics rather than by markets. Governments use taxes to acquire control over goods and services produced outside the government. Whether taxes are levied on what people earn or what they spend their earnings on, they are a cost to producers, and therefore discourage production. The idea that we can somehow tax consumption without taxing production is a contradiction. Why would people produce if not to consume?...A high marginal tax rate on added consumption or on added income, is an effective means of discouraging the added production (economic growth) that makes that added consumption or income possible..." At the minumum why not at least allow democracy to function. Let the people vote, or even better, let the people vote on a much more equitably distributed general sales tax. If nothing else, the elderly, who heavily patronize cafeterias, I think would appreciate the opportunity of voicing concern over a proposed new total of 85C added to each $10.00 worth of dining. As Nehemiah wrote many years ago: "Then there was a great outcry from the people and their wives...We have given our fields and vine gardens to get money for the Ki.ng's taxes, yet we are forcing our sons and daughters to be slaves...we can do nothing about it." (NEH 5:1-5). Thank you for your time, W. L. Andrews, III W I LLIAM ~.. ANDREWS, I II 4504 SrnaKeY ROAD. Surre 300 RonnoKe. Viacin~iA 24014 April 26, 1988 703-989-0295 TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors IN RE: Proposed Meals Tax Admittedly, I am self-interested as a principal in a food service establishment, however, this notwithstanding, I oppose this onerous, sectorally-discriminating meals tax - my ulterior interest being our Lord and the consequent Judeo-Christian principles upon which this great country was founded. Even superficially the concept of such a narrowly-defined financial imposition borders on blatant taxation without representation, if not a myopic and pusillanimouG "cake-walk" down a path of .least resistance. Is due process served when by mere fiat the legislature can grant five people (albeit unanimity requirea) discretion over the cost of every away from home meal without any salient public rejoinder permitted?! Does it take more than elementary grade history to recall our fabled and notorious "Boston Tea Party"?! Which one of the 5 "meals tax czars" can truly identify wit h the impact of a four percent additional burden on sales.- of an increase even dwarfing our recently attained propitious inflation rate - much to the credit of forward-thinking and equanimious- minded economists such as Alan Reynolds of Polyconomics, Inc. in Morristown, N.J.. He, for one, has clearly related that "...it is an illusion to pretend one can tax 'consumption' without taxing production. The whole purpose of taxes is to grab a share of production for uses determined by politics rather than by markets. Governments use taxes to .acquire control over goods and services produced outside the government. Whether taxes are levied on what people earn or what they spend their earnings on, they are a cost to producers, and therefore discourage production. The idea that we can somehow tax consumption without taxing production is a contradiction. Why would people produce if not to consume?...A high marginal tax rate on added consumption or on added income, is an effective means of discouraging the added production (economic growth) that makes that added consumption or income possible..." At the minumum why not at least allow democracy to function. Let the people vote, or even better, let the people vote on a much more equitably distributed general sales tax. If nothing else, the elderly, who heavily patronize cafeterias, I think would appreciate the opportunity of voicing concern over a proposed new total of 85~ added to each $10.00 worth of dining. As Nehemiah wrote many years ago: "Then there was a great outcry from the people and their wives...We have given our fields and vine gardens to get money for the King's taxes, yet we are forcing our sons and daughters to be slaves...we can do nothing about it." (NEH 5:1-5). Thank you for your time, W. L. Andrews, III Wii i.inn~ L. Anuize~~s, iii 4504 S~rnaKe.v Roni). Surrr_ 300 RonnoKe. Vntcinin 24014 April 26, 1988 7113_yny~)zvs TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors IN RE: Proposed Meals Tax Admittedly, I am self-interested as a principal in a food service establishment, however, this notwithstanding, I oppose this onerous, sectorally-discriminating meals tax - my ulterior interest being our fiord and the consequent Judeo-Christian principles upon which this great country was founded. Even superficially the concept of such a narrowly-defined financial imposition borders on blatant taxation without representation, if not•a myopic and pusillanimouG "cake-walk" down a path of .least resistance. Is due process served when by mere fiat the legislature can grant five people (albei.t unanimity required) discretion over the cost of every away from home meal without any salient public rejoinder permitted?! Does it take -nore than elementary grade history to recall our fabled and notorious "Boston Tea Party"?! Which one of the 5 "meals tax czars" can truly identify with the impact of a four percent additional burden on sales - of an increase even dwarfing our recently attained propitious inflation rate - much to the credit of forward-thinking and equanimious- minded economists such as Alan Reynolds of Polyconomics, Inc. in Morristown, N.J.. He, for one, has clearly related that "...it is an illusion to pretend one can tax 'consumption' without taxing production. The whole purpose of taxes is to grab a share of production for uses determined by politics rather than by markets. Governments use taxes to acquire control over goods and services produced outside the government. Whether taxes are levied on what people earn or what they spend their earnings on, they are a cost to producers, and therefore discourage production. The idea that we can somehow tax consumption without taxing production is a contradiction. Why would people produce if not to consume?...A high marginal tax rate on added consumption or on added income, is an effective means of discouraging the added production (economic growth) that makes that added consumption or income possible..." At the minumum why not at least allow democracy to function. I~et the people vote, or even better, let the people vote on a much more equitably distributed general sales tax. If nothing else, the elderly, who heavily patronize cafeterias, I think would appreciate the opportunity of voicing concern over a proposed new total of 85~ added to each $10.00 worth of dining. As Nehemiah wrote many years ago: "Then there was a great outcry from the people and their wives...We have given our fields and vine gardens to get money for the Ki.ng's taxes, yet we are forcing our sons and daughters to be slaves...we can do nothing about it." (NEH 5:1-5). Thank you for your time, W. L. Andrews, III A z 18 ~ 88 8E8QUICENT6N11\~'\' A Btauti~u/Beginning 7 ~ 8 -- COU1Ji'Y OF ROA[\1OKE PUBLIC HEARIDiG FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 BUDGET APRIL 26, 1988 Dear Roanoke County Residents: The following charts and graphs provide a brief suamary of the Roanoke County budget for 1988-89. Even though this is a difficult budget, it does allow the County to move forward in some very important areas such as economic development, regional projects, and public safety. To put this budget in perspective, consideration must be given to some of the accomplishments of recent years and to the future direction of the County. In 'the last three years, the County has added paid paramedics, paid firefighters, additional deputies, joined the Regional Airport Commission, expanded fire stations, added libraries, implemented 9-1-1, and initiated a drainage program. Improvements have been made to many schools, and the new William Byrd Junior High School is nearing ca~npletion. During this time, the County has absorbed more than $5.5 million in recurring annual expenses from the following areas: 1985 - The County removed the fee on refuse service and absorbed the cost of $1.4 million annually. 1986 - The County absorbed the loss of $1.0 million annually in Federal revenue sharing funds. 1987 - The County implemented a bond issue for fire stations, libraries, etc., and absorbed $1.4 million annually in debt service. 1988 - The County absorbed the loss of $1.7 million in State funding for Schools. The adoption of a 4 percent Meals Tax will be necessary to balance this budget and keep other tax rates at their 1984 levels. Several School and County operating departments are being merged to reduce overhead and make future budgets less difficult. This is the way of the future; increased services, greater efficiency. I hope that you will find this information useful. Should you wish additional information, please contact my office or the Budget staff for assistance. ZLL 8TL fii ZS 8LS S 6Z L6Z 8 15~'ZL6 Z08'Z09'T £SZ'SLS'Z 000'OOZ'T 000'99~'SZ 000'999'9Z ££L'Li~0'T SZ8'STL'£ 8SS'£9L'i~ 99L'891 ~08'8Z~'9 OLS'L6S'9 T1iL'£89 L88'TTZ'9 8Z9'S68'9 £9£'L6S 66Z'8£L'L Z99'S££'8 LZL'8i~ $ 806'~ti~'Z $ SZ9'£91i'Z $ 88-L86T ~nO ~a PnS ga png (oaQ) ouI 88-L86Z 68-886T .~at~O uoY~eonpS aotn.zag ggaQ saoinuag u~aumH suoi~~~adO ~gunoO ~~a~~S otT9nd uoz~~a~siuiu~ pore Z~.xauaO sa~n~i pun,3 Te.~~J Pas zd ~~..: ~~-~ ~G'~'.~ Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 In re the petition fora Special Exception Permit being filed by S & J Enterprises to operate a home for adults at 7120 Williamson Road scheduled for the Public Hearing on March 22, 1988, we wish to request this be continued to the meeting scheduled for April 26, 1988. Thank you. Sincerely, . M. Landers, Jr. S & J Enterprises cc: Rob Stalzer, Secretary, Planning Commission ~'~°~~-- / ~~- STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: SE3-3/88 PETITIONER: S & J ENTERPRISES REVIEWED BY: LIZ PARCELL DATE: MARCH 22, 1988 Petition of S & J Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults on a 1.64 acre tract located at 7120 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Special Exception request to utilize an existing 76 unit motel as a home for adults. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 permits a wide variety of commercial uses. A Special Exception Permit is required to operate a home for adults. The ordinance defines a home for adults as "a facility that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are usually functionally impaired and socially isolated but otherwise in good health and are able to maintain a semi- independent lifestyle, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home." Conditions may be attached to the petition by the Board of Supervisors. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT has no objection-since existing entrances will be utilized. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS _ a. Topography: Property-gently slopes=away from Williamson Road. b. Ground Cover:_ Existing building with paved parking lot. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area; designated for high growth. Currently served by urban services. b. General area is developed with a primary arterial highway (US 11) as well as with mixed commercial, office, and residential uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through S. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. a RATING FACTOR COMMENTS "'~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. High density residential uses (12-24 units per acre) are encouraged uses with high compatibility in Core districts. Petitioner's proposed use will be 46 units per acre. Proposed use is consistent with the following policies: C-1 (encourage intensive mixed-use urban development); C-2 (serve each Core area by an arterial); and C-3 (link the County Cores with cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Town of Vinton). Policy C-4 encourages the coordination of commercial sites in regards to the following: (1) easy site to site movement; (2) minimize number of access points; (3) enhanced signage; (4) preserve natural site amenities. Policy C-6 encourages the development of high density residential in Core areas with protective safeguards from adjoining commercial land use disturbances. The intent of this policy is to protect residents from disturbing effects of commercial activities such as lighting, noise, odors, litter, etc., as well as to provide market support for nearby retail centers. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Subject property adjoins heavily traveled primary highway and is surrounded by mixed commercial development and some vacant commercial land._ 3 c. Neighboring Area: Primarily 4 d. Site Layout: Predeterm-fined or green space. _ 3 e. Architecture: - Exterior unchanged. Walkway will-be mixed commercial and residential. by existing structure.- Minimal open of existing building wi_11 be left enclosed. 4 f. Screening and Landscape: Not required according to ordinance. The planting of ;trees along front portion of the property would enhance the appearance as well as shield some traffic from view of the residents. Plantings should not obstruct vehicular sight distance. 3 g_ Amenities: Currently one parking space per unit. 3 h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation is 250 vehicles per day (3.3 trip ends per unit at 76 units). US Route 11 currently has an ADT of 18,785. 3 j_ Circulation: Immediate access to US Route 11. Proposed use will use existing commercial entrance. Internal circulation is tight. UTILITIES 2_ k. Water: Adequate source, adequate distribution. ~ tea. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate transmission, adequate treatment. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No negative impacts anticipated. 2 n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 3 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. 3 q. Parks and Recreation: Minimal green space is available; petitioner plans to provide recreational areas within building. Existing pool to be filled. N/A r. School: TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $872,400 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $780,000 - Total Employees: 15-25 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $17,832 2 2 2 2 4 6. ENVIRONMENT t. Air: u. Water: v. Soils: w. Noise: x. Signage: Not described. Signage should be limited to 12 sq.ft. with consistent lettering style, adequate spacing of letters, words, and lines,-simple geometric shape, and limited message. PLAN CONSISTENCY - This area is designated as Core. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Existing Olympia Motor Inn sign would be dismantled and removed. (2) Building would probably be painted and the parking lot cleaned up in order to attract residents. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal greatly exceeds density limits of 12 to 24 units per acre encouraged in Core area. (2) North County is currently saturated with homes for the elderly. (3) Existing layout of buildings limits the possibility of protecting residents from lights, noise, odors, and litter. 8. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IF APPROVED a. Landscaping along front portion of property. b, Signage limited to 12 sq.f t. with consistent lettering style, adequate spacing of letters, words, and lines, simple geometric shape, and limited message. ~~~ ~ T. ~ ~, , f, :~ i.-; +~ . County of Roanoke Memorandum T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Art Dobie, Sales Agent Ken Cumins, Owner, Cumins & Co., REALTORS February 10, 1988 Change to Special Exception Use ~~~ ~~, ~~ ..~ ~ ~ a1~ .r, ;.. :~~ <,. ~ ,`c_ ~•~ ;C' r~i LT> _ ' ~~~~ `~_ G ~ r As per your application format, we are requesting use change on property located at 7120 Williamson Road, N.W. Presently, the property is being operated as the Olympia Motor Inn with a very increasing vacancy rate. The present owner has offered the property for _sale and _a contract has been written and signed by a prospective buyer. There has also been active interest from other clients.- - This is not a request., for zoning change, but merely a change in-use of property. _ We, too are very interested in-securing optimum-tax base for this area of the county. The home for adults will provide this base and be a valuable addition to the_community. Occupants for this home will be ambulatory thus not requiring any special nursing care. Since aging does effect all of us, such stage of our lives can be lived out here in comfortable and attractive surroundings. The facility will lend itself almost perfectly for such a change of use. We hope that the Board will also see that this change of use will be effective for this property. The board's consideration of the above request will be appreciated. Respectfully, ~~ ~~ Art Dobi.~ K Cumins Promenade Park - 3ib2 £Icaric Road, ti.14'. • Koute 419 1'. O. li<ix 21431 . Roanukr, Virginia 24018 • (703) 989-0800 MLS • ROANOKE COUNTY ' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE ~r~ ?" 8 ~ `a l . Applicant's Name: ~. '~ f .~,/>•~,~ ,G'2 i S~j Phone • 9 ~9 -~ ~ .~~ Address: ~'~ s'o ~i~t Co~y f~ ~ ylE ,~n s ~ ~o~~,~, .~ yA Zip: zy~~~~ 2 . Property owner's name T •~` ~ Ew> E-,PP,~, s~ s -- /'. ~i~ TEL /-~o ~ 5 Address: "7/20th/i~L ,~,yso-~ ~~ ,~/~ Phone: 3G~ ~~~/ ~oa./oi~C U/.~ Zip: ~~o/~ _ 3. Location of Property: 5 ~~ t Size of property / . 6 ~ acres/sue-•ft. /` Size of proposed special exception use /, ~ ~ acres/sq..-fit. 4 . Tax Map # : '- Old Tax Map # : ;~ 7• i~ •- Z - ~ 5. Zoning Classification: ~ - 2. 6. Magisterial District Location: L Lin/S G T~ .sT,e ~G7 7. Existing Land Use: ~d ~-~~ ~ ,~,t S i /~-U~PA~/ ~~ _ 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: /-~ D uz > /c'~ s /~o,yE _ = 9-. Comprehensive Plan Designation:_ Off' ~ o - 10: Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: _~ ~D ooa ~-s%i~1/~TE ~~ Eli s>~~/~ ~ l~ Value of Land Z~~, boo Value-of P-r-epos~d Buildings 58~~ ao ~ Value of Machinery & Tools N ~ Number to be Employed j~ - ZS w 11. Check Completed Items: 1~~ 8#" x 11" plot plan ~ Consultation ~' List of adjacent property owners ~ Fs Letter of Application vd ~ Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport $401~A11 other Special Exception Uses 12. Date of Application: 2 ~2 2 /~ ~' 13. Applicant's Signature: 14,. Owner's SignaturP_ c~ , : ,,~ i I ~o pe-~ers Creek ~oaq 1 2 s~-ores ~ 2 5 ~'o r V ~U•J ~ - i _ ` --' i I' i ~ I d-~ ~ n~e~Pr~~es SP~CiG~ ~ xce~rlon }-1~~~~~ai~~n Norv~e ~c~r R~I~,~+S -, "~ _ ~' I I` J V V~ I! I j~ ~'V' S O! ~ ~ ,° ~ '. 4~ A C rz.S Co ~ n i ~S C{ in ~~~ rpoM ~ `• ~ ' 'F~ r~ ~ i ~ ! 220 v u Po .y~/ 1 ~ S IiM[RfsaOpRIH161 i$ ?~' J < <~^ ,~ 6 Iw< 44k 1 Y~i S~ 1I T fJ ,stAp a" ~c;,°... ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ SUMMEROEAN ~~~~o- 1 ,~ suNNreROOlc `mil ~„ ~ ~~ ~`~,~ '~S°" ~e lens Gee k' ~ ~~~ ~ 'o.~ ~l 3', ci'/ ~ 1, \ \ \ ~. on. ~ j SUMUE SST VIEW ~°°T~.U.la'"' \\°v ~ tac9V=`4'~ ` c(~RdENB g/APTS. ~ '• N~nlrlnlLLS ~ i .~. ~ `\ ey~"W o`+" r - . ~/ ~ r.;~ ? Cbl1kJY Ct ao ~ j _ _ • ` .~~A',« a» oe?(Q~v~s~ 11\.,,nwa nc ~ t pJ 115 . -- VICINITY Mep NnQru ~ ~ , ~ \ / 6 62 ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ a,,h a slI Q ~ ~ ~ .AI ^,~ / /<"'_ BZ ~f72 K BZ / BZ / ec~k - ~ ~ O ,ar 3 - 2 8.1 1 B2 . ~' ~~~ - uzor _ - ' ~ ~~ `RT ' r ~ ' ' ~ Q i q : - w.u1 for ..,, Use. N,t p - _ ~~ i I ~ fi , o~,~~d Fo B2 ~.: / t ,•~ 1. y .< .\ B2 I ~C = ~~ .tuna ' ,` , ~~ \ 1 t.ar r+ B 3 ~ i / ` ` ` ~ ~• ~: B 2 ~ ~ i ei 1. i BZ O ~ / 2 R1 ' / wi ~ . ~ . ~ i~r / O ~ 7 s "' ~ w c ' 62 . I 1? O \ ~ n 5 • . \ N b _`R 'te`e ~~ r 1 G \ ly ,. s•• .~ t. `:J a < \ u -~ s b ~, 6 4 A t ROANOKE COUNTY D1=RARTMENT Of DEVELO~'MEAIT e S & J Enterprises Special Exception Permit -Home for Adults ~°~ ., -~ ,~.~ . ,~ ' PETITIONER: M. E. HII1r1AN & DOMINION TRUST CO. / / CASE NIY~lBER: 21-4/88 `~" 88 -_ 3 Planning Cccnmission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of M.E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to rezone a 3.56 acre tract fran R-1, Residential and M-2, Industrial to B-2, Business to operate a retail garden center business, and to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CI`T'IZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Cc~nission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Site to be developed in substantial confornnity with the site plan of Buford T. Ltm~sden & Assoc. b. Signage on the site, exclusive of warning signs relating to the parking, will be limited to 6 sq.ft. c. If permitted by ordinance, a handrail or fence along walkway under Rt. 601 will be constructed. d. If the business is open after dusk, lighting will be installed along walkway. 5. CONA'IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the amendment to the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Development to Transition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None NOTE: LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT OF THE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT WAS INADVERTENTLY OMITTED FROM THE NOTICE--WILL BE ADVERTISID Ft~R THE MAY 24 MEETING. Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the rezoning request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACI~IEN'TS "~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11"> /~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other : -~ Robert S lzer, Planning Commission Secretary f `~ `~ 88- 3 ~ :< ,S ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ /; ~ _- ~~ -,~~~. ` - `~ ~~ C 1 1 -. i .Y~r .I.S /~ • ~ pis ~ \ ~~ --~_v VOk~! SMTOH ~ j "' ,: i; ~.~ ~'~ r ~ ~ ~: -~. ~ I s-; ~ I, ~~ ., `, ` _ ~ ~ ~ i, ~ I ~ ;..',~ ?Q / ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ;~ ' ~~ 04 + J 'I I~ •~ I r rV /i ~ : ~ I / ,'C~ I ~ 1 / f~ \ -- ~ ~ X1;1 '~ i ~~ J) Z ^' l I ? N C ` .. i I f ~ b ~% i I ~~ ,i / ~ 0 cE~ °r /J i `~' J ~, ~ ~ p ~ _ 3 ~ ~5 :+-7 .. ..\~~ F"!-~ .~ ~ ~ ( ~ 1 L ~ I ~ 1 ~ _~ ~) ; ~ ~ I ~ .:~ 1 ,- ~ i ~ , I ~: ,.. - _~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ 7 r ~~ '~88'-.3 D AltIDTU ~~ v ~~ ~ ~~ ~_~` J as A g ~ti ~I-"~` ROANOKE COUNTY F _ 1. 1:. Ilintn~3n I)umini~n ~fru:;t Cc~. d , DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT I~-~ ~A `1-_' Cu !'~-I ;, I.,1n~1 l':,c' :`lau rAnt~~nrim~,nr ,. ^ ~v~~~~ 1 1 IIIf1f ~~` VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ;.~: ,,,~.- H 2 w H 2 0 U 0 H m Q w 0 a a a OSTERHOIiDT, FERGLISON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEY5-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 IN RE: A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-I-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioners, M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District, and M-2, Industrial District District to B-2, Business District, for the purpose of conducting a retail garden center business. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the proffered conditions, on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT OP.DERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax - 9 - ?' .,.. Maps as part of Parcel No. 38.16-I-3.1 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-1, Residential District, and M-2, Industrial District District to B-2, Business District. A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-I-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records with the following conditions: (1) Site to be developed in substantial conformity OSTERHDUDT, FERGLISON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 with the site plan of Buford T. Lumsden 8 Assoc., submitted herewith. (2) Signage on the site, exclusive of warning signs relating to the parking, wi I I be I invited to six (6) square feet. (3) If permitted by Ordinance, a handrail or fence along the walkway under Route 601 will be constructed. (4) If the business is open after dusk, lighting will be installed along the walkway. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning tVtap of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor seconded by Supervisor McGraw ----------------- Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: - 1Q - 7 ~ ~: m .~ AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT: None ~!/ ~_ _ Deput~erk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ^STERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D10-1699 cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections r2.e5g.c - 11 - X88 -~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 21-4/88 PETITIONER: M.E. Hinman & Dominion Trust Co. REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow DATE: April 5, 1988 Petition of M.E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to rezone a 3.56 acre tract from R-1, Residential and M-2, Industrial to B-2, Business to operate a retail garden center business, and to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Plan from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to operate a retail garden center. The site will be comprised of two existing greenhouses and an outdoor horticultural display area. b. Petitioner's request requires an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from Development to Transition. The land use amendment and the rezoning proposal will be reviewed simultaneously by both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. c. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe the proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2, General Commercial District, permits a wide variety of commercial and office uses. Petitioner has proffered a condition which ensures that the development would occur in substantial conformity with the attached site plan. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. VDOT has advised that since pedestrian travel under the Hollins Road Bridge was not a consideration in the design and construction of the bridge, additional review by the Richmond VDOT office will be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site is moderately sloped towards Tinker Creek. b. Ground Cover: Mature grass, shrubs, and two greenhouses. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area, designated for stimulated growth. The site is located within the urban service area. - 4 - ~8 8 -3 supporting commercial uses. Also, as previously stated, parcels situated on the south side of Hollins Road are designated as Principle Industrial. By extending the Transition land use category to Tinker Creek, future residential uses situated north of Hollins Road will be buffered from the adjacent industrial uses by a commercial strip along Hollins Road. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Predominantly rural (low density resi- dential) with commercial uses located south of the site at the intersection of Hollins and Plantation Roads. site fronts on a major collector roadway. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Commercial, light industrial, low density residential and a major collector roadway. 3 d. Site Layout: Access to the site would be limited from Hollins Road. Due to a lack of space on the garden center site, the petitioner proposes to locate the parking facility on the vacant lot across from the site on the south side of Hollins Road. To alleviate any potential traffic hazards resulting from pedestrians crossing Hollins Road to reach the garden center, the petitioner plans to construct a pedestrian walkway under the Hollins Road Bridge. The walkway would be constructed of mulch and would connect the garden center with the parking facility. The staff supports the concept of the pedestrian underpass as long as appropriate steps are taken to ensure that customers utilize the walkway. In addition to the vertical slope between the roadway and the parking lot, the petitioner proposes to construct a fence with accompanying plantings to prevent customers from crossing Hollins Road. Also, staff recommends that the petitioner construct a hand rail along the walkway to encourage customers to stay away from Tinker Creek. This will assist handicapped patrons who utilize the walkway. Finally, the petitioner should ensure that the walkway will be adequately lighted. This is particularly critical if the petitioner expects to maintain evening hours of operation. These conditions should be proffered individ- ually or specifically noted on the site plan. The staff also recommends that the petitioner amend the site plan and relocate the two storage bins shown just west of the parking lot to a location outside of the 100 year flood plain. These items are particularly hazardous during flood conditions. N/A e. Architecture: 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Screening and buffering will be required per the County ordinance. - 5 - ~~C,~ b. General area is sparsely developed with low density residential. Some commercial and industrial land uses are located in the general area. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. The Development designation is intended to delineate areas for planned residential communities. It is not an appropriate designation for commercial land uses. Consequently, a land use amendment will be required. The petitioner has submitted a request to amend the Future -. Land Use Plan from Development to Transition to accommo- -_ date the proposed retail garden center. The Transition designation is intended to delineate certain highway frontage strips where orderly development is encouraged. The staff's analysis of the petitioner's proposed amend- ment to Future Land Use Plan Map is included below. -- As stated, the proposed garden center site is currently designated as Development on the Future Land Use Plan Map. Except for several properties fronting on the north side of Hollins Road, which are designated as Transition, the Development land use designation encompasses all parcels located between Tinker Creek and Hollins Road, extending north from the Hollins Road Bridge to the north County line. The Transition designation, which includes only those properties that front on the north side of Hollins Road, extends from approximately 1800 feet north of the Hollins Road Bridge to the north County line. One parcel, located approximately 7800 feet north of the bridge is designated as Park and Open Space. All parcels fronting on the south side of Hollins Road, extending from the Hollins Road Bridge to the north County line, are designated as Principal Industrial. The flood prone areas adjoining Tinker Creek are designated as Surface Water and Flood Hazard areas. The staff is in favor of extending the Transition land use designation further west to Tinker Creek. Since the intersection at Hollins and Plantation Roads currently serves as a commercial node, it seems logical to extend the Transition land use designation to accompany - 6 - 2 g. Amenities: Adequate parking is included on the site plan. 3 h. Natural features: A significant portion of both the garden center site and the accompanying parking lot will be located in the 100 year flood plain. Except for two storage bins, the petitioner is not proposing to erect any additional structures within the flood plain. Most of this area will be utilized as a horticulture display area and a parking lot. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation for the proposed use is approximately 35 vehicle trip ends per day. This estimate is based on other specialty retail operations and is calculated by the number of anticipated employees. 1986 ADT on Route 601 (Hollins Road) was 3829. 3 j. Circulation: As previously discussed, the petitioner proposes to locate the nursery and the parking facility on opposite sides of Hollins Road. To prevent any potential traffic circulation problems that may result from this arrangement, the petitioner plans to construct a pedestri- an walkway under the Hollins Road Bridge (see "d" Site Layout above). Appropriate use of the walkway should prevent any circulation problems associated with pedestri- ans on Hollins Road. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No problems noted. 3 n. Floodplain: As previously mentioned, a significant portion of the site is located within the 100 year flood plain. Although most the area within the flood plain is designated as a horticultural display area or parking lot, the staff recommends that the petitioner amend the site plan and relocate the storage bins to an area outside of the flood plain. Storage bins, as those illustrated on the site plan, are not appropriate for flood prone areas. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: - 7 - ~~~~ 1 TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement value: Presently - $109,000 Future - $211,500 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $130,000 - Total Employees: 5 - Total revenue to the County/Year: $5,033 New revenue - $3,778 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Petitioner advises that no more than 6 square feet of signage will be erected on the site. This condition should be secured by a proffer or specific designation of such on the site plan. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Development land use category. The petitioner's request is inconsistent with the land use plan map and stated policies. Consequently, the petitioner has submitted a request to amend the land use map designation from Development to Transition. The staff supports the petitioner's request and recommends amending the Future Land Use Map by extending the Transition designation currently on Hollins Road west to Tinker Creek. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposed use is appropriate for the Tinker Creek flood prone area. (2) Petitioner has proffered that development will occur in substantial conformity with the site plan. b. Weaknesses: (1) Site plan identifies two storage bins within the 100 year flood plain. (2) The petitioner should proffer additional conditions regarding sign size and additional fencing along the northern edge of the parking lot. - 8 - ~ > VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------- IN RE: A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creed within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-I-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records PETITION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioners, M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS, respectfully file this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I. The Petitioners are the owners of the OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24 018-16 9 9 above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1, Residential District, and M-2, Industrial District District. 3. The property is designated Development and Flood Hazard in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4. Your Petitioners now desire to have this property rezoned as B-2, Business District for the purpose of conducting a retail garden center business. WHEREFORE, your Petitioners respectfully request that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioners request that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS By_-~'~~ ~~~ ____-- Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron ~ Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioners r2.e5a.c ^5TERHOUDT, FERGU50N NATT, AHERON B, AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24019-1fi99 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY .,,.,. KY/ t''~ H z w H z 0 U O H m A W 0 a a a IN RE: A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-I-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records RECOMMENDATION -------------- TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioners, M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS, have filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District, and M-2, Industrial District District to B-2, Business District for the purpose of conducting a retail garden center business. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on April 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSGN NATT,ANERON&AGEE consideration haS recommended t0 the Board Of COUnty ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24 01 8-1 6 9 9 Supervisors tha t the rezoning be granted. NO~iI, THEREFORE, BE I T RESOLVED t ha t t he P I ann i ng Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2, Business District, subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ms. Flippen and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Gordon, Ms. Flippen, Mr. Winstead, Mr. Witt, Mr. Jones NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON -- NATT, AHERON & AGEE _ ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW rT e5 f C ~`:~`~I~ ' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Secretary 24018-1699 Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 ~. PETITIONER: HOBART CCNIl~ANIES, LTD. ~~ ~' ~~ CASE NCI~ER: 18-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of the Hobart Companies, Ltd. to amend the conditions on a 4.974 acre tract located on the south side of Peters Creek Road immediately southwest of its intersection with Deer Branch Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Ccmmission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'PORS a. Circulation: Site is well served by existing arterial highways. Access is provided at two points, one shared with an adjoining property. With previous staff report, the engineering department recommended that the right turn lane be extended for the entire length of the frontage on Peters Creek Road to better accommodate right turning traffic. Should direct access to Peters Creek from the out parcel be sought, the right turn lane mentioned above should be reconsidered. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Development will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc. b. Uses to be limited to office, retail sales, banks, service industry uses together with warehousing and light manufacturing as allowed in § 21-24-1, M-l, Light Industrial District, (A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the Roanoke County Code with the provision that no M-1 uses will be permitted on the out parcel. c. Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 sq.ft. on the 4.13 acre parcel. Signage on the outparcel shall not exceed 36 sq.ft. d. There shall be no outside storage of materials. e. All lighting shall be directed away from the adjoining residential property. f. .All building shall be constructed with brick on the front thereof. 5. OONA4ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the request with amended proffers. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATI'ACHIMENTS -' Concept Plan (8~" x 11") / Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ,/` Staff Report ., . Other: -~ r,_.;,r ~,; ~„~r ~:a rc~ ~.~..~ ~~Z rr ~ : a . Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary ~S8_ ~ APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ~' i ~ ~ i ~•K~EB~ ~ ~~~ s ~,~~e~n ~.~ ~~. ~ ~ 1~ ~ + h+tlM1~i ~ tl 1` f C ~ ~ + =~ ~~ ~ ~ - 2 - -y8~_ -_. REVISED CONCEPT PLAN i ~ ~~ J -'- -- ~~'' ' -- _____. I r -,~/ ~ J `-= -__-~ _ ~ 1 ~ ,/ 1 / / ~ ~ ~ • ' _~ ~ / ~ ~~ ~ i // ~ ~ ~~i f ~ I rr i / ~ i\- / ~'J ,~ , ~ / ~_ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ / / ~ _ ~ ~ i d r ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~i 1 Z i : t~ / e i ~ / i' ~~ ~ ~ i j ,r/rte. ir~~ i~ ~ ~ J I ~ ~ ~~ J 1 i / / ~.._ ~ ~~ ( ,~ ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ---- -__ ! - /~ ~I~ ~/ d - ~ 0 _~ ~ / /.. •. _ ~ i ' ~ .-- ~ ~ ~ '~ / s ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .. ~ - ----- - ~ _ _ _ _ ----- __._-l- -- - - ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ .. i .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~i~~ ~ ~ B 0 9~~ ~~~ n ~ S ~ ~. C ~ ~ ~ _ ~ .- 4 ' , xM ~ ~ ~ y :~ ~~~~ - 3 - D ~~?/ r~~! fi.aoow.l~D 1~ ja.Y IlSwer.na,~ S ~ `r°o5 'ou v°r 4''~.(~.Fr °1~DOUiHiO~ ~~.'N .\04 tp ~ ~.~.. ~/w ~.Mp~~„~.:'jTWKE~KNuII ~~aP ~~~~w~9 c1. y_; .Cy "~. \J' ~~ Ord' ,~ / ...~ .` to *y 1 \J ytrA ~~_,~tr.- v1 ''•. ,'. pn~KE~Yy~~~" v~~s~~ ~'~: '_ ®i~p1..c Mn S C"' P ~'J'`f i_~_ -Qr..r~!( ~ o~%~C s~ \\~`'i~yS,.,.~wo~ T ~ wr.'..<~ ~__ I (N(yy G y~' ~ ~G...~ r,,., 1 S~ .. 'S~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ yt n MI .~ yr/., ofcuJ+o T I ~~ ~9 9o-°/~\SUM.. - "~q ~ wIGHPr .. ~ ~sb ~~ `~" ~ 1 . o ~ ` / ~ f WANDS v?t1i~~.....~ 6~ ~ ^ ;4 n~CYY / ivy ~ (9py. 4, __ Jr~.ry~/'~fAf~~MGC. .. .. .:' i.O~SIMlNY6g00K '~!l ~q C~ 5l_f<C It....stIE1V ~ ~. ~n,ooi[to" ' o `~,(~C,ycgtr+!o. ~~~ / ,)i $`,APTS ~ ~NORTII HILI$ '"^'i~~ ' v - d'.~PlyMptfil c~ PppO~ 4.n _~ ~9.~ir (~.. - D .:Fr: ; , 1 .-. Q ., ww11N ...a0!t) ~ H(D~~~ -.. = L VICINITY MAP ~88 .- D NnQru ~,~ - i~~~ ~' ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ ~r Thy !lobart C~,m~~. n i ~s , L'I'U ~;C DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT :~menl:a~L>n; ~; I,:~~n~l i t i ins 6 I1 - 4 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- '. H 2 w N z 0 U 0 H r~ A w 0 a a a OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA '~~ 24018-1649 ~'~ IN RE: A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Ea~a6vHa Magisterial District, and recordea as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Records FINAL ORDER Hollins TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD., did petition the Board of County Supervisors to amend the proffers on the above-referenced parcel of land for the "use not provided for" District, for the purpose of the development of office, retail, warehousing and light manufacturing. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the amendments be approved. on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the proffers for the "use not provided for" on the aforementioned parcel of - 9 - ~ ~ ~- "7 land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13 and legally described below: A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Hollins C~ Magisterial District, and recorded as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Records be amended to read as follows: (1) Development will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., submitted herewith with a minimum of a 25 foot buffer adjoining any residential property. (2) Uses to be limited to: office, retail sales, banks, service industry uses together with warehousing and light manufacturing as allowed in Section 21-24-I, M-1, Light Industrial District, (A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the Roanoke County Code with the provision that no M-1 uses will be permitted on the outparcel. (3) Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 square feet exclusive of the signage on the outparcel. signage on the outparcel shall not exceed 36 square feet. (4) There shall be no outside storage of materials. OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSGN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RGANQKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 (5) All lighting shall be directed away from the adjoining residential property. - 10 - `f8~-y' (6) All building shall be constructed with brick on the front thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor ~nhnrGan , seconded by Supervisor _ Nickens________~ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT: None mc~~ ~_ ---------------------------- Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON `,.' e 1 5 i c NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTD RN EYS-AT-LAW' ROANDKE, VIRGINIA 2401&-1699 - 11 - STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 18-4/88 REVIE69ED BY: Jon Hartley PETITIONER: The Hobart Companies Ltd. DATE: March 30, 1988 Petition of the Hobart Companies, Ltd. to amend the conditions on a 4.974 acre tract located on the south side of Peters Creek Road immediately southwest of its intersection with Deer Branch Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner is requesting to amend the proffered condition regarding conformity with the concept plan for the Use Not Provided For Permit approved by the Board of Supervisors on February 23, 1988. This permit was to develop a mixed use development in a B-2 General Commercial District and R-1, Residential District with proffered conditions that the uses would be limited to offices, retail sales, warehousing, and select light manufacturing allowed in the M-1 district. The revised concept plan shows a reduction of both floor area, from 42,480 to 33,350 square feet, and parking spaces, from 175 to 143 spaces. The revised concept plan also shows an out parcel of 1.02 acres fronting on Peters Creek Road not previously indicated, which reduces the acreage of the proposed project from 5.15 to 4.13 acres. b. Attached concept plans (approved and revised) and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Section i5.1-491.2 of the Code of Virginia requires any changes in proffered conditions to be approved pursuant to the rezoning process. b. The proffered conditions approved in February would apply to the " entire parcel even if the revised concept plan is approved, including conformance with the concept plan and the uses allowed under the Use Not Provided For Permit. This would permit office, retail and select light industrial uses on the out parcel. Also, since the out parcel is shown vacant, additional amendment to the proffers would be required for the out parcel once a use and site layout are determined, unless the out parcel is specifically exempted from conformance with the concept plan. c. Site plan review will be required to insure conformity with County regulations. d. VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Gently sloping towards Deer Branch. b. Ground Cover: Open fields and light brush. - 5 - ~~'~ - 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated as a high growth area, currently receiving urban services. b. General area is primarily developed with office, institutional, general and service retail uses, and low density residential. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and policies. Policy C-1 - encouraging mixed-use development, and C-5 - effective screening and buffering along residential-commercial borders are adequately provided for by the petitioner as indicated in the previous staff report. Policy C-4 - coordinate the design of commercial sites was addressed in the approved plan, but could be diminished with the creation of the out parcel, particularly if separate access to Peters Creek Road is sought. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Surrounding land is institutional, commercial, and low density residential. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring area is predominately commercial and iiZStitutional, with some low density residential. 3 d. Site Layout: As per revised concept plan. Interior parking has been modified to accommodate out parcel. Revised concept plan eliminates delivery vehicle access to rear portions of Building "A". Approved plan included a proffer restricting lighting. 2 e. Architecture: Brick on the front was proffered with the approved plan. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: As required by the Ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: Residence located directly west of proposed development is listed in Historic Sites in Roanoke County, Virginia prepared by the Planning Department in 1979. Site received a grade 4 on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being of greatest historical importance. Described as a mid-late 19th century modified I-form house on large tract of land. 2 h. Natural Amenities: No negative effect. - 6 - " Tai' ~.m 1 TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: The previous staff report estimated that 2,200 or more trips per day could be generated by this proposal. With the reduction in floor area, this figure would be reduced to 1730 ADT. This does not include traffic generated by the outlot, which depending on use, could exceed the original estimate. In 1986 there were 24,610 ADT on this section of Peters Creek Road. Intersection of Peters Creek Road and Williamson Road recently improved. 4 j. Circulation: Site is well served by existing arterial highways. Access is provided at two points, one shared with an adjoining property. With previous staff report, the Engineering Dept. recommended that the right turn lane be extended for the entire length of the frontage on Peters Creek Road to better accommodate right turning traffic. Should direct access to Peters Creek from the out parcel be sought, the right turn lane mentioned above should be reconsidered. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Necessary water service would have to be provided by extending an 8 inch water line located west of the site. Extension would be at developer's expense. 2 1. Sewer: Public sewer. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: Tinker Creek. Downstream flooding has been severe in past rain storms. Staff suggests stormwater detention be provided with 10 year detention and 2 year release, as mentioned in the previous staff report. 3 n. Floodplain: Site plans will have to indicate 100 year floodway and 100 year flood elevation for Deer Branch pursuant to County ordinance. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service area. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service area. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. Schools: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: 52,822,000 x 1.15=532,453(new) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not Available - Total Employees: 200 - Total Revenue to the County/Year: ENVIRONTiENT 2 t. Air. Land and Improvement Value Only =532,453(new) - 7 - ~8~ - ~ 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Petitioner proffered that stand alone sign will not exceed 48 square feet with approved plan. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core and is consistent with the land use plan map and the policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: on tax base Consistency Plan. (3) plan, signa prohibiting (1) Revised concept plan maintains positive effect and provision of employment opportunities. (2) with mixed use policies contained within the Land Use Petitioner has maintained proffers on uses, concept ge, lighting, building facade materials and a proffer outside storage. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposing the out parcel is contrary to the Core policy which encourages coordinated design of commercial sites. (2) Range of uses proposed for the out parcel could be more narrowly defined. (3) Traffic safety and circulation could be improved by restricting access directly from the out parcel to Peters Creek Road or by extending the right turn lane and reducing number of access points. (4) Potential negative impact on recognized historic site. - 8 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Catawba Magisterial District, and recorded as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Records RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to amend the proffers for the "use not provided for" ors the above-referenced parcel of land for the purpose of the development of office, retail, service industry uses, warehousing and limited light manufacturing. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due con- sideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the proffers for the "use not provided for" be amended OSTERHOI.lUT, FERGOSON aS fO I I OWS NATT, AHERON & AGES ATTORNEYS-AT-IAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016-1699 (1) Development will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., submitted herewith, with a minimum of a 25 foot buffer adjoining any residential property. OSTERHOUOT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW R~ANOKE, VIRGINIA 2aoie-1659 (2) Uses to be limited to: office, retail sales, service industry uses together with warehousing and light manufacturing as allowed in Section 21-24-I, M-1, Light Industrial District, (A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the Roanoke County Code with the provision that no M-1 uses will be permitted. (3) Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 square feet exclusive of the signage on the outparcel. Signage on the outparcel shall not exceed 36 square feet. (4) There shall be no outside storage of materials. (5) All lighting shall be directed away from the adjoining residential property. (6) All building shall be constructed with brick on the front thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be granted a "use not provided for," subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Witt, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Ms. Flippen, Mr. Winstead, Mr. Jones, Mr. Witt, and Mr. Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, r1.e15d.c Secretary Roar~oke County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS_OF_ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------- - IN RE: A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Hollins Magisterial District, and recorded as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Records PETITION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, TFiE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD., OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON NATT, ANERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I . TFie Petitioner i s the contract purchaser of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as a "use not provide for." 3. The property is designated Core in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4. Your Petitioner now desires to amend the conditions previously attached to the "use not provided i for," pursuant to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinances, for the purpose of amending the proffer relating to the site plan for the location of buildings on the property. 1^1HEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD. Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron >; Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner r1.e15b.c OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24O18-1fi99 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: A 2.85 acre parcel of land, generally located at the north- easterly intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #26.20-4-27 in the Roanoke County Tax Records RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, HOP-IN FOOD STORES, OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24 018-16 9 9 INC., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District to B-2, Business District for the purpose of developing a complex of an office building, convenience store and donut shop. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on April 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning ^5TERHOUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-IAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-Ifi99 Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2, Business District, subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ms. Flippen to deny the rezoning request, but said motion was defeated upon the following recorded votes: AYES: Ms. Flippen, Mr. Jones NAYS: Mr. Witt, ti1r. Gordon and Mr. Winstead ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, ~~,~ ~ -~,_ Secretary r2.e4c.c Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: A 2.85 acre parcel of land, generally located at the north- easterly intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #26.20-4-27 in the Roanoke County Tax Records PETITION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, HOP-IN FOOD STORES, INC., OSTERHONGT, FERGNSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATT~RNEYS-AT-LAW RGANGKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I. The Petitioner is the contract purchaser of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1, Residential District. 3. The property is designated Transition in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4. Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as B-2, Business District for the purpose of developing a complex of an office building, convenience store and donut shop. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, HOP-IN FOOD STORES, INC. Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner OSTERHDIIOT, FERGIJSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE AT70RNEY5-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D15-1699 2 Y ~ ~' N r E R E Q U E S T AP P EARA ,~ ~~ to PUBLIC HEARING ON n of the Board of Supervisors Chairma the above matter so I would like the hearing on the Public uidelines listed recognize me during follow the g t I may comment. I agree to IUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND tha WHEN CALLED TO THE PO below FOR THE RECORD. five minutes ADDRESS between three aidual or limit r will have indiv s eake eaking l• Each ble whether sp chairman will decide on an issue, and avails The s eaking the maj°r1tY of repra on t e number of citizens P unless instructed by base the rule Dint of will enforce do otherwise. of their p, the Board to resentation twined by a be enter will be limited to P, Speakers uestions of clarification may 2' only. 4 between view Debate the Chairman. the Boardis not allowed. must directed to All comments speaker and audience memberslse courtesy at all 3' a recognized exerc eskers and the audience will 4. Both sP statements times. leave any written reQuested tO clerk. gHALL 5 • Speaker Co~erits with the GROUP ORGA1`1 IZ ED and/or TO SPEAK FOR AN FROM THE GROUP PURPORTI WRITTEN AUTHORIZATHEM. 6. INDIV WITH THE CLERK FILE THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ALLOWING E W R I T E L E G I B L Y PLEA S - NAME= ADDRESS: PHONE: out, give to the Deputy PLEASE NOTE' (After filling ou.~ Clerk. Thank Y ~ ~ ~,- S. A P P E A R A N_ C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : .r ~ nirn .c ~ ~-p'y\; T ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~ A P P E A R A N. ^ E~ R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~.~ ~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : 2~ ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~ s A P P E A R A I1 .C E~ R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON `fg~'Jc- I~F2onrtnlG ~oR !-SOP-I// I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS r^OR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements (n JL ~~ and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAP~lE : L //VN/E~r~ L GO r2 ADDRESS: 7~3~ ~U7ruMN ~ppZ) L,g~~- ~RND ~c(_ Co ~,"ry a 5Fo lei PHONE : a ~ s- o a 8a PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A Id~C E~ R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~F' ~ ~ ~f`= - lyJ / .~. ~ _ ,. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are .requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME . t..../'~fi~/~~ , rr''' ',~,` ~~ , ,%~~ ~~~ ADDRESS : ~ i'y%% ~~~~'~ l~ T~'.~-~~ z ~ ~ ~: 'f ,~ PHONE : ~ ~ '~' ~' ~~ " lr: ,-..~ - PLEASE NOTE: CAfter filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) -~~8_S- A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON `~ ~~_ ~ ~~~.~ C~ `J~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6.. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~ \"~ ~ ~ _A. \O.~J ADDRESS: ~~ c''s C~ ,~~~ c PHONE: ._ ~ ~' PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.> t { ~~ ~* .Y PETITIONER: RICHARD AND TAMARA CARRF.T.r. C~ ~j CASE N[~RBER: 17-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and to hold obedience training classes on a 3.079 acre tract, located immediately east of the terminus of State Route 667 in the Vinton Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were approximately 14 present in opposition to the request, and four in favor at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. Taimy Joe Williams, an attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Ollen Hartman, presented a petition containing 13 signatures of neighbors in opposition to the request. He noted the concerns of the neighbors: the number of dogs, location of the training area, noise. Bonnie McCutcheon stated her opposition to the location of the commercial kennel. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Fire Protection: Outside established service standard. b. Rescue: Outside established service standard. c. Potential for a noise problem from barking dogs. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS Site: a. No kennel will be constructed within 150 feet of the property line adjoining the McCutcheon property. b. No business usage of any sort will be within 150 feet of the property line. c. No kennel will be constructed within 200 feet of Route 667. Improvements: d. No more than 15 kennels to be built for commercial purposes with a total of not more than 24 dogs residing on the premises. e. Kennel and training facility area will be fenced to ensure that no dogs may escape. f. The ground around the training area will be built up slightly along the edges with dirt. It will then be planted with a pine tree border. The entire area will also be fenced. g. The fence around the training area will be constructed of wood crossbuck fencing with welded wire fencing attached to it. h. There will be no artificial illumination of the training area. i. There will be one sign which will be wooden and non-illuminated. j. The training and pa rking areas will be maintained so as not to become unsightly. k. A kennel silencer will be installed and maintained in the commercial kennel. Operations: 1. All dogs on the property for boarding or training purposes will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence. m. All boarded dogs will be confined inside the kennel building during normal sleeping hours overnight--approximately 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. n. There will be no more than 3 hours of group classes a day. o. No group classes on Sundays. .~ ~c~g __ ~, p. No more than 15 dogs in group obedience classes plus 3 trained demonstration dogs on the training field at one time. No training will occur after 7:30 p.m. q. Dogs in the training area for exercise will not exceed 5 and will always be supervised by applicant or employee of applicant. No dogs will be in the training area at any time unless for training or .for exercise. When any dog is in the training area for training,no dogs shall be present for exercise and when any dog is in the training area for exercise, no dogs shall be present for training. 5. CONA~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Jones moved to deny the petition with proffered conditions, stating that he has no objection to the present kennel but a run is not the proper use for the property. The motion was defeated with the following roll call vote: AYES: Jones NAYS: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Winstead ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHI~NTS / Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: ~ ~~. Robert Stalzer, Planning Ccnanission Secretary - 2 - Y F'.IGIIFlYI~ ~. C~~11~-f,~,ELI_ JC 0 1 r~ ~.. PtoratTr OP ~ ~ _~ OlLE1J 8. IiAaTMAN 1 ~ L'/IC ACRES> ~J _ •'~~ r 4~ d ~/,` 0.01 C Ac.Te 6a CouvaYae Tr H/y O~<.aY E.NARTMAY -Y~CAt\L, 1 •• . 4>• 1Aa Aret • GDYA N. MtASrI 1 1 n l It fc. ~ pA . `~ f._ / ld lAr~~ n_nre C ~ 1 arecveq, ~` --- ,~- BOUIJDARY DATA Y If ~~ n~ AREq'*/c, ~~~ 1 ~ v.V '' TOVA.NwY'RT'CGC~ 3.O1~ ACRES ~ A K,~~ _ _ _ cl ~~~.- COR3. 6EARIIIC ~ISTAIJC6 ~ IO \'" ~Eq ~ .~ ~ ~ I~t /. +`~,, ~~,,o~ 1 BOY110ARY BATA 1 •L $.4l•0!'04't. Il3.21 ~ (u~~`,~+ ~/ ~~ ' ,`; 'LO W+' 0.0lG ACRE t•! 5.81'S3'4!'a:. SC.I! • to ,%°"e~ v 2' •~ ~• pCOtS. D[ARIUG DISTA4Ct S•4 11.16'4.1'SS'C. S01.CC SC'NMRrOAr ~w •~.~~` A_g N.CS'00'E, 3t.Li ow uw A• 4•S S.7.47'40't. 114.7c L~aT•r.4 ;;~ ~ 3 %~r.w ~ 8-C S,IT25'2S'E. 13.18 s•c S.S4.14•ol'w.-'Nl,le ~ f ~/'~~~ ~ E" ~ c•o s.ls•ort!•t. e4.oo C•i S.CI'SS'It'W. 65.51 v °I, 1 °' 0•E N.BL'll'4L'W. 15.81 m ~,I I ~ l.y 5.14'34'43'w. z4•to k ~ ~; , ~ `'+ i z E•F u.lt'1I'40'W. Sl.C3 8.7 N.ll'31'4J'W. 503.41 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ;~ ~ i•G 11.I0'IL'32'W. 14.14 1.10 1J.L5'4S'40't. 11.41 4 ~~ ~ L-~ ~ i ~° d 6•A 11.30'30'W. Sl.ll 10.11 11.30'Sl'tl'W. St.51 •1' t` ,~ 7 I yT00.Y 1 Ir ~ h 7 F0.ANa NOwsa 1 1 ~ 11.12 IJ.St•IL'42'W. 41.3! ~~ / ~ ,+ "--~ i '~ o 1 ° IL•I3 3.61'SO'OYYL SS.SI ~ y ~ ~ i 1 t3.14 W. tl'43'01'w. 21.1! ~ _ ~ 0 ~*~+-- ; ~ ~ a 14•li S. GO'4!'tS'W. II.C1 ~~^ ~~ ~ = 1' r IS•IG 11.CL'N'OC'W. It.1t ~~~ ~ < < j I < 1!f U ~ 1 , J IC•Il S.l!'2G'4f'W. IS.10 A 20•:,'0 ~~.~ a ~' W '11` v NOTE: Il.lb N.SO'SI'It'W. 11.3! l M«arY SPUUat~ ~ ~ 11 1\1 F AccSSSTOTNa S.OT1ACec1tAC7 It•1! N.IG'0T43'W.14.40 nojtcn ~.~UL v` < o ' N•t0 U.II.OL'OS'E.70.66 ~HO~IVCS ° r s .~ ~c~til r r P ~ a• eta to•21 11.55•!S'4c•t.41.36 c Es'"(`I ~~ 0;~' ~`~ o ~ ~`, ~ p u ti•LL W. LL•3!'t3"E. 11.71 oaE` c~< ~Y ~ p ~ ~ ~ 0 a¢i w ~ 22•I U.II'tl'4L'W. LS.t7 ~ pu. i ~ ti~ ~ ~~~ ~ NOTE : 111JE5 FROM CORNERS vStil~ C gS ~~ U ~ S ~" ~ o[ i-t•s• ~JS~v~P'"~~ o: ~Z 4Tos ARB NiW L14E~~ Y m ~ ~ 0.' TO 8E-PRPIIOiD OVCR A LO ROAC 0.1W FalIa NIVG TNa ClYTtt L14t 0-Tpa GtAYEL ROAD IQAOIYQ FROM VA. HWY, RT, CCl TO SITC. CAet L, MSAOOt 6. fiOpA H.MaADOt RHtiLVa WATaR RIOMTf Tp US^ SPi1YC Ou TNa 3.017 Acea TtAeT, ~ d~ oy y' \/ `j 50 3 ' R Nap L,ut ~.;°.i ~, r''~ s 3 aa.~ a • y ~~ 7y REM gIN1UC PCD1•fRTY OF APP DYED: C,31o CARL 1. MGA000. sr EDNA H. MEA DOC °' S _ 9 A T, ROA NO ka COVYTY TANNING COMMISS~ AT8 _ _ SURVEY FOR °'~ `~~' L. MEADOR 8c. EOIdA H, MEADOR ,~ 1 AA•-.- v.l~a ~~ f3ol1~:C~~-..>' ' I~E1.11.IL• L. 4 ANO T~A1N.1-.1C~ A~tiA i,~ T. P. PARKER ~'~ LAND SUgVEYOR ~ CERTIFICATE NO. n~ .p X20 r '~~FU t A M D `'~ SHOWING A 0.0lG ACRE TRACT TO BE COUYQY60 TO OL,L,6N 8. NARTAAAI! A1J0 A 3.019 ACRE TRACT TO BG CONVG.YtO TO RICHARD ~• CARRELL d. TAMARA M, CARtG~I ROANOK6 COUIJTY VIRGINIA sY: T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINEERS ~ SURVEYORS , 1T0. SALEM VIRGINIA TNC fURJLCT FRO-[R TT If NOT VITNIN TN! LlN1T5 0- TNR 100 TfaR !LOGO aWNDART AS CSTARLIfN[0 fT TNC t[OUTAL INfURANCt ADMINISTRATION. .C' ~ ~., ..J ~ ......«•n Ow,•MMI N celwnAu LOCATIOIJ MAP " 0 N NnRru ._ L ' ROANOKE COUNTY P.ichard & 'Camara Carrell °~ :r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT lJse dot Provided l~or Perm1.C ~,~ ^ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ t11Hr - - 4 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y A 3'079 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on Route 667 ) one mile from Route 666 > within the Vinton ) FINAL ORDER ~ Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # 99.00-1-33.1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~/y TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~S-.~ WHEREAS, your Petitioner Richard J. and Tamara M. Carrell did petition the Board of County Supervisors fora "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above-referenced parcel for the purpose of Residence and boarding kennel of ut~ to fifteen dog runs, obedience training classes in fenced area, limited hours and days WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5 , 19 88 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the "Use Not Provided For" permit be denied on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 99.00-1-33.1 and recorded in Deek Book 1218 Page 113 and legally described below, be issued a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the purpose of Residence and boarding kennel of up to fifteen dog runs, obedience training classes in fenced area, limited hours and days. - 8 - Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING in the center of the branch at Corner "1" , on the east line of the Ollen B. Hartman 2 1/16 acre tract, said point being approximately 30 feet east of the centerline of Va. Hwy. Rt. No. 667 (30 feet wide); thence with four new lines thru the property of Carl L. Meador and Edna H. Meador, S. 47° 09' 04" E. 133.21 feet to an iron pin at Corner "2"; thence S. 81° 53' 43" E. 36.79 feet to an iron pin at Corner "3"; thence N. 78° 41'53" E. 509.66 feet to an iron pin at Corner °'4"; thence S. 9° 49' 48" E. 174.96 feet to an iron pin at Corner °'5" on the northwesterly line of the formerly Hubert & Edith Kelly property; thence with the same, following the existing fence, S. 54° 14' 03" W. 197.18 feet to a 30 inch red oak at Corner "6"; thence s. 67° 33' 18" W. 65.59 feet to a 10 inch hickory at Corner "7"; thence S. 74° 34'.43" W. 24.20 feet to a 24 inch red oak at Corner "8"; thence N. 77° 37° 41" W., passing a 36 inch white oak on line at 287.34 feet, in all 303.41 feet to Corner "9" in the centerline of a branch; thence dovan in the branch as it meanders, the following 10 courses and distances, N. 25° 45' 40" E. 11.47 feet to Corner "10"; thence N. 30° 57' 21" W. 11.69 W. 38.51 feet to Corner "12"; thence S. 81° 50' 02" W. 33.57 feet to corner "13"; thence N. 81° 43' 09" W. 27.99 feet to Corner °'14"; thence S. 60° 45' 25" W. 11.69 feet to Corner °'15"; thence N. 62° 19' 06" W. 18.92 feet to Corner "16"; thence S. 79° 26' 45" w. 15.10 feet to Corner "17"; thence- N. 50° 51' 12" ca. 19.39 feet to Corner "18"; thence N. 16° 09'43" W. 14.40 feet to Corner "19" on the easterly right-of-way line of Va. Hwy. Rt. No. 667; thence with same, N. 17° 02' 03" E. 70.88 feet to Corner °'20" in the centerline of the branch; thence leaving the right-of-way of said highway and with the center of the branch, the following three courses and distances, N. 35° 35' 43" E. 41.38 feet to Corner "21"; thence N. 22° 39' 23'° E. 27.91 feet to Corner "22"; thence N. 11° 21' 42" V,7. 25.29 feet to Corner "12", the place of BEGINNING and containing 3.079 acres, as shown on plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd., dated December 26, 1984. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the seconded by official zoning map of Roanoke County. Supervisor Johnson DENIED ~-on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: Ate' Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickers ~'YS' Supervisors Garrett, McGraw ABSENT: None `~"~Q-~-~--~ .~ C~.<~¢.~~-tom ~ e'P ci-r- Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of .Development & Inspections - 9 - ~ry H z w H z 0 U O H Q w 0 x a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.079 acre parcel of land, generally located on Route 667 one mile from Route 666 within the Vinton Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 99.00-1-33.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioners Richard and Tamara Carrell hereby voluntarily proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following .conditions to the "Use Not Provided For" permit of the above-referenced parcel of land: A. Site Restrictions 1. No kennel will be construced within 150 feet of the property line, as of April 5, 1988, between our property and that of Bonnie McCutcheon. 2. No business usage of any sort will be within 150 feet of the property line described in condition Al. 3. No kennel will be constructed within 200 feet of Route 667. - 10 - B. Improvements 1. There will be no more than 15 kennels built for commercial purposes; with a total of not more than 24 dogs resident on the premises. 2. The kennel facility and training area will be fenced to'ensure that no dogs may escape. 3. The ground around the training area will be built up slightly along the edges with dirt. It will then be planted with a pine tree border. The entire area will also be fenced. 4. The fence around the Training Area will be constructed of wood crossbuck fencing with welded wire fencing attached to it. 5. There will be no artificial illumination of the training area. 6. There will be one sign which will be wooden and non-illuminated. 7. The training area and parking area will be maintained so as not to become unsightly. 8. A Kennel Silencer will be installed and maintained in the commercial kennel. C. Operations 1. All dogs on this property for boarding or training purposes will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence. 2. All boarded dogs will be confined inside the kennel building during normal sleeping hours overnight - approximately 11:00 p.m., until 6:00 a.m. 3. There will be no more than 3 hours of group classes a day. 4. There will be no group classes on Sundays. 5. There will be no more than 15 dogs in group obedience classes plus 3 trained demonstration dogs on the training field at one time. No training will occur after 7:30 p.m. - 11 - ' t . 7 6. Dogs in the training area for exercise will not exceed 5 and will always be supervised by applicant or employee of applicant. No dogs will be in the Training Area at any time unless for training or for exercise. When any dog is in the Training Area for training, no dogs shall be present for exercise and when any dog is in the Training Area for exercise, no dogs shall be present for training. Respectfully submitted, ~J --/'~~ -1 c~ ~ cv ..,.mac L T ?~e ? To,_Pn~ Petiti~rfers 5~,,~,~zA,~ S; l.~u,~T,;ti - 12 - ~~~ -- C~J STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 17-4/88 PETITIONER: RICHARD AND TAMARA CARRELL REVIEWED BY: LYNN JOHNSON DATE: APRIL 5, 1988 Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and to hold obedience training classes on a 3.079 acre tract, located immediately east of the terminus of State Route 667 in the Vinton Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner requests a "Use Not Provided For" permit to construct a maximum 15-run dog kennel with boarding and obedience training classes in an A-1 Agricultural District. List of proffers limits number of kennels to be built, the number and size of classes, and insures confinement of dogs on the property at all times. There is currently a private kennel on the property licensed for 20 dogs. Petitioner now has 8 dogs and 6 private runs. Section 21-20 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a private kennel as allowing three or more dogs over six months old to be kept on the property as pets or for pleasure, hunting, exhibiting, dog showing, or field and obedience trials; commercial gain is not the primary objective. This Section also defines a commercial kennel as allowing the sale, rental, caring, breeding, grooming, keeping and boarding of dogs, cats, or other domestic animals for commercial purposes. Commercial purposes means that the dogs or other domestic animals are primarily kept for a fee or other form of compensation. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully": ~-~ 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The Agricultural (A-1) District permits a variety of animal- related activities and businesses, including the keeping of animals and fowl, dairying, riding academies, livestock markets, and private kennels. However, commercial kennels are not a permitted use in the A-1 District. The Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) list dog kennels under "agricultural production-livestock." b. Section 21-102-5 states that an application for a Use Not Provided For permit may be made to the County, "if, in any district, a use is not specifically permitted." c. Site plan review will be required to insure conformity with County regulations. d. VDOT`entra`rice permit is required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Level area by the road, slopes steeply up to the driveway. Area around dwelling and kennel is level, then slopes steeply to the rear of the property. b. Ground Cover: Flat area by road is covered in overgrown briars and brush. Area around house and kennels is cleared and remaining borders are heavily wooded. - 5 - ~~~ 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Mt. Pleasant Community Planning Area, Designated to limit growth; does not currently have and is not intended to receive urban services. b. General area is rural: very low density residential, some farming, woodlands, and steep slopes. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve Land Use Category. The kennel is considered an Agricultural Business and the use is consistent with RP-6 (Encourage new agricultural services). A kennel as defined by the SIC manual is an agricultural business. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Very low density residential, open fields and wooded areas with steep slopes, some farming. 2 c. Neighboring Area: See Surrounding Land. 3 d. Site Layout: Determined by existing dwelling, existing private kennels, and topography. Parking and training areas are located in flat area adjacent to the road (two residential dwellings are directly opposite this area.) Kennels will be located behind the house and shielded from public views. Parking, training, and kennel areas will be fenced and dogs will be confined at all times to a fenced area or on a leash, N/A e. Architecture: 2 f. Screening and Landscape r The ground around the parking and training areas will be built up slightly along the edges with dirt and planted with a pine border. This area will also be fenced. Staff recommends a style of fencing compatible with the rural character of the surrounding land. A privacy fence will be placed around the kennels. In addition, existing dwelling and heavy tree cover on remaining property borders will shield kennel area from surrounding views. ? g. Amenities: Parking area-will be provided adjacent to the obedience training area, __ 1 h. - Na~_ura~:- F~a~turss: North, East, and South borders are heavily wooded;"construction will not require clearing existing trees. Lower west end of property to be cleared of briars and maintained as a grass field. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Current ADT for Old Virginia Springs Road (VA 667) is 66. With an average of 3 classes per week and a maximum of 15 dogs per class, the estimated additional trip ends per week is 90. Additional trip ends not estimated for boarding facilities. - 6 - -, ~.~ R~ ? j. Circulation: Existing driveway to serve as access to/from parking area. UTILITIES 2 k, Water: Private water (spring). ? 1. Sewer: Private septic, DRAINAGE 2 m, Basin: Back Creek Basin; property is bordered on west side by a spring branch, No drainage problems noted. 2 n, Floodplain: The property is not within the limits of the 100 year flood boundary as established by the Federal Insurance Administration, PUBLIC SERVICES 4 0. Fire Protection: Outside established service standard. 4 p. Rescue: Outside established service standard. N/A q, Parks and Recreation: N/A N A r, School: N/A TAX BASE 2 s, - Land and Improvement Value: N/A - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $10,000 - Total Employees: 1 or 2 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approx, $340 new revenue ENVIRONMENT 2 t, Air: 3 u. Water: Water rights are reserved to the spring located on the property. Siting for waste disposal in relation to spring location must meet health. department standards in order to avoid contamination of water supply, 2 v, Soils: 3 w, Noise: All dogs will be confined indoors overnight to insure quiet conditions. Location of kennels behind house and the heavily wooded borders should lessen impact of barking dogs during the day, 3 x, Signage: Signage has not been specified. Staff recommends a sign style compatible with the character of the surrounding land. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve area. The kennel is an Agricultural Business and is consistent with the Land Use Plan Map and defined policies, specifically policy RP-6 (encourages agricultural businesses), 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Consistent with the Land Use Plan Map and policies. (2) Location of kennels shields them from surrounding views, (3) Overgrown briar/brush area to be mowed and maintained as grass field, improving the appearance from the road and nearby houses. (4) Plantings proffered on western boundary could not otherwise be enforced by ordinance. b. Weaknesses: (1) Active areas (parking and obedience training areas) are located adjacent to road and clearly visible from nearby residential dwellings. (2) There is potential for a noise problem from barking dogs. - 7 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY 3.079 acre parcel of land, ) A generally located on Route 667 ) one mile from Route 666 ) ) RDCON~iENDATION within the Vinton Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 99.00-1-33.1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) 'I'0 THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: 1 ~~~g, your Petitioner Richard J and T ma~a tit ^a~-~'e has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Comtttission a petition to request a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above referenced parcel of land for the purpose of Residence and boardin kennel obedience training classes in fenced area, limited hours and days. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as 19 g 8 and tended, did hold a public hearing on Apr i 1 5 WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recannended to the Board of County Supervisors that the request be granted NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning r~loflland~~gaanted ae Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced pa Use Not Provided For Permit ones to eny t e The above action was adopted on motion of peti~~ith profferedand upon the following recorded vote: Aye: Jones ~,yS; Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Winstead None ABSENT: Respectfully submitted, __=~: tile. ;-. Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Ccnunission i ~ ~~ Q_ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ;,~,~~~ ~_~,,~~~,~.~ ~~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by .the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: _'~~~~~~, y ~Ci. GYl/~/n~T s ADDRESS : Sv, T/~ 3 ~~ --~ PHONE: ~%~, ~ f~L1 PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) PETITIONER: ERNF'ST (:LARK .~''~°'~ "~~ ,~ CASE N[MBIIt: 19-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. R}7QUEST Petition of Ernest Clark to rezone a 9.77 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhames, located on the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately one half mile east of its intersection with Taney Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were approximately 10 present in opposition and 8 in favor at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. Duane Williams and Stafford Lewis noted their concerns: sewer and water; the effect on public well water; drainage; increased traffic accidents and congestion; opposed to rental property; decreased property values. Alan Amos and Carlton Wright noted their support of the project. (Note: a question was raised pursuant to the use of adjoining school property f or recreational purposes. Public tennis courts and an open practice field are available. The tract and football stadium are not open to the public.) 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Project will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. Parker & Son. b. Streets will be developed in accordance with state standards and submitted for acceptance into state secondary system. c. Units will be similar to design submitted herewith. d. A pedestrian footpath easement in at least two locations from the public streets within the subdivision to the adjoining school board property. e. Ten year storm detention will be provided with a two year storm release. 5. CONY~4ISSIONER' S MOTION, VO`!'E AND REASON Mrs. Flippen noted that all effort should be made to sell rather than rent the units and moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS / Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: ..~~ h' ~ .._L„ Robert Stal er, Planning Commission Secretary (ys M N~ ~~- K ~ 9 ~ oP ~ ~ ~7 a'Y ~~^< ~.iQ~ _ ~~~~ ~ 1 N 1 n N \ I 'null'nI IInI'I IjnII ~ \\ \~/ // ~ ~\ ~ N m O ~ ' / q N r Q F Q~ ~ (~ J 99 ~ W °n~>o f~EJ rN ~p - j. O __ ' 1 - 1 ~~ Y4 ~ Z ~1VM vnvn~ ~~ - _ N ' 0 _ yy~ ~ _ c - r o O y ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t ~ v ~ 4- ~ __ 1 m 1 Jp ~ _~ 1 1 M1VM VNVNV9 ~ C-= ~O W ~ ~- 0 n ~-. O ~y 0 s~ ~P`99 ~ '- ~ _ -- ~8:.~ 3 o.~~ i _ _ _ N _ h c _.- ~ Yi -- _``- - ---, ~` o § _a / n ~ fib, .n F~S.gga ~~_~ N3nyti _ 239 -~._ QOOM ~ o ti ~~ - 2 - ~~ y~~ `F 3 C A pCpn [O ~M `o~HO^_ c 91~ (O( YYJ~ k }~ C ~C F. `~_ 4 S N~ W J `~3 ~ N O ~ ~ Y d J -- ~, W w` V V 4/ Z C d O +/ ~L~ 3z ~ m W N r .~~ -' ~~ ~ 's ii 0.i ~ ~ > ~~ x~ a~ ~° w~~~ s E+ ,~ D NnRru ~~ Y ~• ^ ^^ - 3 - A k `' ROANOKE COUNTY Ernest Clark d :2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R-1 to R-5 eye '~ ~ ~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE_COUNTY `l- H z w H O U 0 H m Q w 0 a w a IN RE: A 9.77 acre parcel of land, generally located on the South Side of Wood Haven Road west of I-581, within the Hollins Magisterial district and recorded as Parcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 in the Roanoke County Tax Records FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, ERNEST CLARK, did peti- tion the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District to R-5, Townhouse District, for the purpose of constructing townhomes on the property. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Com- mission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the proffered conditions, on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned OSTERHOUDT, fERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 and i ~~ ^STERHGUGT, FERGUSCIN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTGRNEY5-AT-LAW RGANGKE, VIRGINIA 24GtG-1699 legally described below, be rezoned from R-1, Residential District to R-5, Townhouse District. A 9.77 acre parcel of land, generally located on the South Side of Wood Haven Road west of I-581, within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 in the Roanoke County Tax Records with the following conditions: (1) Project will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. Parker 8 Son, submitted herewith. (2) Streets will be developed in accordance with state standards and submitted for acceptance into state secondary system. (3) Units will be similar to design submitted herewith. (4) A pedestrian footpath easement in at least two locations from the public streets within the subdivision to the adjoining school board property will be shown on the recorded plat of development. (5) Ten year storm detention will be provided with a two year storm release. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission - 9 - f ~, ~, '" ~ ~` and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson seconded by Supervisor Nickens _____, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT: None _ _ ~_ . ~Q~,t.~--- Deputy C erk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ^STERHDUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24018-Ib99 cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections r2.e6c.c - 10 - ~~ ' STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 19-4/88 PETITIONER: ERNEST CLARR REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER ~~ DATE: APRIL 5, 1988 Petition of Ernest Clark to rezone a 9.77 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhomes, located on the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately one half mile east of its intersection with Taney Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct 35 two unit townhouse buildings and to convert one existing single family structure into a townhouse unit for a total of 36 buildings and 72 townhomes on 9.77 acres. Proposed density for the 9.77 acre tract is 7.37 units per acre. b. The attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. R-5 zoning district permits only the construction of townhomes. Concept plan limiting the number of units has been proffered. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT entrance permit required. Internal roads to be constructed to state standards. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Gently sloping towards Route 628 (Wood Haven Road). b. Ground Cover: Most of the parcel is heavily wooded with mature tree cover. Existing single family home is located on the front portion of the property. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Hollins Community Planning Area, future growth encouraged. Urban services available. b. General area is developed with existing single family subdivision construction as well as rural residential development. Property adjoins rear portion of the Northside High School and Jr. High School complex. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 4 - RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Petitioner's request conforms with both the land use plan map and defined policies. Single family attached and multifamily development of middle to high density (6-12 units per acre) is a desirable land use type. Specifically, the petitioner's request complies with policy D-1 (manage rate, location and the amount of new residential growth according to public service and facility capacity and availability); and D-9 (a residential project that has a significant increase in density from surrounding areas should have direct access to a collector or an arterial street). Petitioner's request to construct townhouse units at a density of 7.37 units per acre is well within the density guidelines of 6 to 12 units per acre stipulated by the Development land use type guideline. The petitioner's request does not cluster buildings to preserve natural amenities or common open space. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Immediately surrounding property is vacant residential development at a very low density. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Includes existing single family subdivision constructed at a density of approximately 4 units per acre as well as existing rural density residential construction. 3 d. Site Layout: Cul-de-sacs will be used to access all but three dwelling units. Of these three, two will be within the existing single family home that is accessed by way of Wood Haven Road. Site plan does not use clustering of buildings to preserve natural amenities or common open space. Townhouse development must comply with the site pi:a-n design criteria contained within ~ 21-41-2, paragraph B, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2 e. Architecture: Petitioner has proffered that units will be similar to design submitted in application package. Design concepts will be available for review by Planning Commissioners at the public hearing. Designs consist of four types; two are single story with brick an3game facades; the other two are two story variations. Two of the designs are unique in that they make better use of corner lots, traditionally an area where townhome design is not well suited. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. - ,,_3 g. Amenities: Concept p1a-n- shows no common open space or recreational areas preserved `f or the use of residents. Parcel adjoins neighboring Northside High School and Jr. High athletic fields. Petitioner has not indicated whether pedestrian access will be available to nearby athletic fields. 3 h. Natural Features: Site is heavily wooded. Proposed development will require the removal of many mature trees. - 5 - TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Anticipated traffic generation will be approximately 800. vehicle trip ends per day, or 81.8 trip ends per acre. Thi•$ is equivalent to 8.2 single family units per acre. Current ADT on Wood Haven Road (Route 628) is approximately 1,200 vehicles. Proposal is consistent with policy T-1 of the Roanoke County Transportation Plan which states that community land use objectives should be balanced with urban and rural street functional capabilities. Wood Haven Road is a major collector street. According to the street service guideline contained within the transportation plan, Wood Haven Road is adequate to carry the vehicle trips per net acre that will be generated by the development. 3 j. Circulation: The proposed project is well served by internal streets. Access to Wood Haven Road (Route 628) will be limited to 3 dwelling units. Existing single family home, which will be converted into a two unit townhome, is already accessed by way of Wood Haven Road. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. 2 m. N/A n. DRAINAGE Basin: No problems noted. Engineering Department requests proffer for 10 year storm detention with a two year storm release. Floodplain: --~- PUBLIC SERVICES _____ 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. 3 q. Parks and Recreation: Petitioner is not proposing any on site park facilities; however, proposed development is immediately adjacent to Northside Hiqh School athletic complex. 3 r. School: If 72 one, two, and three bedroom townhome units are constructed; it is anticipated that there will be 35 school age residents. The elementary, junior high and high school facilities serving North Roanoke County have adequate capacity to accommodate these students. Costs: estimated costs for educating one schoolchild per year is $3,715. Of this amount, $1,796 is local funding. Total local costs to educate 35 students is approximately $63,000. Difference between total costs and total revenue is -$13,770. - 6 - 4 TAX BASE o ~,:~""S ~ ~ s. - Land and Improvement Value: $4.32 million - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: 0 - Total Employees: 0 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $49,100 of new revenue. The Economic Development Department notes that the project does not support the 1987 economic development strategy that defines a need to build upon a commercial-industrial base for Roanoke County to achieve a ratio of 75/25 residential to commercial- industrial tax base revenue. It is also noted that while a 144 new County residents will be generated, no new employment base will be created. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Per ordinance for subdivision development.. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Proposed use is consistent with both the land use map and the defined policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal-is consistent with the land use map and policies. (2) Proposal is consistent with surrounding land uses. (3) Development will be served by an existing major collector highway system and adequate utilities. b. Weaknesses: (1) No on site recreational or open space facilities are proposed. (2) Cost of educating anticipated school age children will exceed expected revenues from the project. (3) Desirable land use types within the Development land use category states that single family attached and multi- family development should be clustered to preserve natural amenities. No clustering or open space is proposed. - 7 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ------------------------------- OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSGN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RGANOKE, VIRGINIA zaGie-1e99 IN RE: A 9.77 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the South Side ) of Wood Haven Road west of I-581, ) within the Hollins Magisterial ) district and recorded as Parcel ) No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) RECOMMENDATION -------------- TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, ERNEST CLARK, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District to R-5, Townhouse District for the purpose of constructing townhomes on the property. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on April 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to R-5, Townhouse District, subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ms. Flippen and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Gordon, Ms. Flippen, Mr. Winstead, Mr. Witt, N1r. Jones OSTERNOUOT, FERGU50N NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RGANOKE, VIRGfNIA 24018-1699 NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ~~ rZ.e6b.c Respectfully submitted, -~ : s - ~~1A .~itf._ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE_THE_BOARD_OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: ) PETITION A 12.69 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the South Side ) of Wood Haven Road west of I-581, ) within the Hollins Magisterial ) district and recorded as Parcel ) No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-Z ) and part of Parcel No. 37.06-1-75 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, ERNEST CLARK, respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I. The Petitioner is the contract purchaser of ^STERHOUDT, FERGU50N NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 the above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1, Residential District. 3. The property is designated Development in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4. Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as R-5, Townhouse District for the purpose of constructing townhomes on the property. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, ERNEST CLARK By_~f .~1.~ -------- Of Counse-~ - Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner ^STERHOUDT, FERGU50N NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANDKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1fi99 2 r ~ ` !_"'~ PETITIONER: ROGIIt HALE AND MII~ MpN'IC~QNIERY ~ _.. } CASE Nf~IBER: 22-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of Roger D. Hale and F. Mike Montgomery for a Use Not Provided Permit and to rezone a 0.23 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-2, Business to operate a dog grooming business, located at 4355 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'InRS a. Screening and Landscaping are not present on property and have not been proffered. According to § 21-92, type D screening and buffering would be required. The existing site design, building location and land ownership prevents strict compliance with this requirement. However, the property in question is topographically higher than adjoining residences, alleviating some of the need for screening. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. There will not be any outside kennel runs. Dogs will be on leash. b. Property will not be used for flea market, stone yard, junk dealer, dance hall, billiard room, auto garage, or business with the sale of alcoholic beverages. 5. CONY~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None b. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHI~NTS /, Concept Plan (8~" x 11") 7 Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: <<' ~ .~. Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary -a- D NnRru ---..... B -3 ~ M Y1000 -,~ ~ t _ -~ pve• 18 4~ ` ~ - s* ~ ~ •ui~ a ` a' 2 /` r `Oi ~ a~ ii a 13 ~ N ~, ~~ r ~ 521 ~ ~~ e V°\~ X42 41 ..JJ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ p'V`° ee • ~ ~ tss I 4 • d ~n 3T p ~` ~ ~ . .~ ~ s ~. 'Day ;,45 't ~ ` ~ ~n 35 ~ 23 ~ a ~ 7 ~ N N i ~ ~ i~ 34 24 n' • u}~. 6 O / 48 a n N \ \ p 6.• ,o.L` 49 ~ ~ 33 25 ~ K 4 5 ~ b' ~ M a° '6 .3 `• ii a ~ 'O ~ O 28 a s ~~ ' ~ ~ .n 29.x.. o, , ~ ~ ;,p <a 30 5 n .a Q~c'4~ r' ~~ Canry SoMod Baoid .~'c All properties are zoned R-3, z.sanooa ZiZa` 'o ~ unless otherwise noted. °. - 3 - A ` ROANOKE COUNTY Roger Hale & Mike Montgomery " DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R-3 to B-2 & Use Not Provided For Permit VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY 4-~1 l A ~ ~~~acre parcel of land, generally located ~~~~~d~~ ~e ~ within the ~ ) Magisterial District, and ) FINAL ORDER recorded as parcel # ~7U~--/ -,/~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~' did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the abo e-referen d parcel from ~/ ~~ District to ,~ ;~~ ~~'~~.~ibistrict for the purpose of ~~,,~y,,, ~ _ ^.. ~~ _., .,_ s /~ ~ _ , ~.A ~ ., . ~ WHRREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on G~~~L~,;~1 ~ , 19 ~b,~ at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proferred conditions on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel and recorded in Deek Book Page R-3 Residential District to and legally described below, be rezoned from B-2 Business - 8 - District. y~~, Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING at an iron pin located S. 16° 20' 00" E. 235.20 ft. from the point of intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way line_of Valley Avenue with the southwesterly right-of-way line of U.S. Route No. 2201 thence with such line of U.S. Route No. 220, S. I6' 20' 00" E. 78.51 ft. to an iron pin= thence S. 74' 34' 00" W. 125.66 ft. to an iron pinj thence N. 1S° 26' 00" W. 78.50 ft. to an iron pins thence N. 74' 34' 00" E. 124.43 ft. to the place of BEGINNING, being part of Lots 6. 7 and 8. Block 1, PinY_ard Court (P.B. 1, age 363) as shown on a plat of survey dated March 24, 1987 made by Buford T. Lumsden ~ Associates, P.C.. a copy of which is at- tached hereto and BEING the same property acquired by Thomas B. Whitfield and Ethel Mae Whitfield husband and wife. by deed dated March 17, 1942 and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke in Deed Book 296, page 141. and by deed dated March 10, 1943 and recorded in such Clerk's Office in Deed Book 303, page 4I9. Thomas B. Whitfield died on June 13. 1981, and Ethel Mae Whitfield died on November 28. 1986, as evidenced by wills recorded in such Clerk's Office in Will Book ~~ 36. page 36 and Will Book 40, page 910. i~ OEEO +'' State Tax S~,~Q~_ In the ,'~ County Tax S-~-QlL d ~ ~= Office d the Circuit Court tqr the Courtly Transfer Fee ~(i~ n~• Va., thi~,~~, day ug~2tAb Chrtc's Fee ~sOo ~ ~• and with the oertif;pb d ~~ 038 State i ~~ a~OM~°d~nt thereto annexed. admitted to 220local ~~_ reoxd aL~2~ o'dodc ~Id. The fazes {mp~~ Total ~' ~ 58.1801 i -802 d the have t~ P+id. ~~ Ttsf _ ~ ~ • CNrtc BE IT FURTHIIZ ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on~the official zoning map of Roanoke County. Supervisor Robers ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by following recorded vote: and upon the AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Gar,,rett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~ ego [.~ f- ~)!~- ~ - .~ . Clerk y Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections - 9 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y t' A ~~ ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~~~~ ~~/j~^~,~~ ) i '~•S.~ /S`ir~~~r~/1-l , L~ _ G ~°/~ ) PROFFER within the ,'~,,,~ ~ ~/ ) OF ~ Magisterial District, and > CONDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # _~~'f p~'- /- /~ ) ~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) L H z w H 2 0 U 0 H cn Q w 0 x a a TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ,~~' < ~~.,a Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq, of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner ~,J~ . ~~ ~%~r.~~. ~,,~ hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supe isors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~- , ', L/ ,~ ~ ,,,~ ~` ~~~ Respectfully submitted, / i, tioner -lo- ,~~~ ~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 22 - 4/88 PETITIONER: Roger Hale and Mike Montgomery REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: March 30, 1988 Petition of Roger D. Hale and F. Mike Montgomery (dba The Yuppie Puppie) for a Use Not Provided For Permit and to rezone a 0.23 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-2, Business to operate a dog grooming business, located at 4355 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject property from R-3, Residential to B-2, Business in order to operate a dog grooming business in an existing structure. In addition, they are requesting a Use Not Provided For Permit in order to reside on the premises. They have been operating under a City of Roanoke Business License since August, 1987, based on the understanding that the property was located in the City. b. Petitioner has proffered as a condition that there will be no outdoor kennel runs and that all dogs will be leashed. c. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Section 21-20, Definitions, includes dog grooming in the definition of a commercial kennel. Commercial kennels are a permitted use in the B-2, Business District provided there are no exterior dog runs. (With exterior dog runs, M-1 Light Industrial zoning would be required.) The B-2 district also permits a wide variety of general commercial activities (see attached list of permitted uses), but does not permit residential uses. b. Section 21-102-5 states that an application for a Use Not Provided For Permit can be made to the County "if, in any district, a use is not specifically permitted". c. Site plan review may be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Rear portion of property is level, sloping steeply from the building to Route 220. --:._- b. Ground Cover: Property is lightly landscaped. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Springs Community Planning Area. Designated as an area where the initiative is to stabilize growth. b. General area is developed with commercial activity along Route 220, with residential and institutional uses to the rear. - 4 - ~S' ~_ - ~. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category which encourages multi-family residences, office and institutional uses, and retail uses if clustered or within a planned shopping center. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and policies. Proposed use meets Policy TR-2 - encourage new retail uses in groupings of independent buildings, TR-5 - limit conversion of detached housing units into retail uses unless sites are combined, and TR-7 coordinate vehicular movement and provide shared access. Policy TR-9 - provide strict screening and buffering along rear property lines which back up to less intensive residential uses - will be difficult to meet due to site constraints (see comments under f. below). 2 b. Surrounding Land: Surrounding land is commercial, high and low density residential, institutional and vacant land. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring area is commercial, low density residential and vacant land. Property is adjacent to Pinkard Court subdivision. 2 d. Site Layout: As per concept plan. Access to property is via a private driveway, shared with the White House Gallerys, off of Valley Rd., 117 ft. from the intersection with Route 220. Access directly from Route 220 is not feasible due to excessive grade. Gravel parking area is located at rear of building at end of private driveway. Parking area appears adequate for proposed use. 2 e. Architecture: Existing log structure has no documented historical or architectural significance. 4 f. Screening and Landscaping: Landscaping and screening are not present on property and have not been proffered. According to Section 21-92, Type D screening and buffering would be required. The existing site design, building location and land ownership prevents strict compliance with this requirement. However, the property in question is topographically higher than adjoining residences, alleviating some of the need for screening. N/A g. Amenities: N/A N/A h. Natural Features: N/A - 5 - TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: In 1986 there were 18,070 ADT on this segment of Route 220 and 279 ADT on Valley Rd. According to the petitioner, 8 customers are expected daily, which would generate 16 trips per day. Access in and out of Valley Road from Route 220 is often difficult due to the volume and speed of traffic on Route 220. ? 7. Circulation: Traffic circulation is limited by the dead end driveway and parking lot configuration serving the property. UTILITIES ? k. Water: Adequate public water. ? 1. Sewer: Adequate public Sewer. DRAINAGE ? m. Basin: Ore Branch. N/A n. Floodplain: N/A PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service area. ? p. Rescue: Within established service area. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A N/A r. Schools: N/A TAX BASE ? s• - Land and Improvement Value: $16,100 x 1.15 = $185.15 (new) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $4,000 x .034 = $13.60 - Total Employees: 2 - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $198.75 (new} ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: ? v. Soils: 3 w. Noise: Dogs will be kept indoors except when arriving or departing. Despite this, some additional noise could occur. 3 x. signage: Existing signage consists of two signs with a total of 23 square feet. Section 21-93 would permit up to 235 square feet on this property. No proffer limiting signage has been offered. - 6 - 5. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designdted as Transition and the petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and meets many of the applicable plan policies including TR-2, TR-5 and TR-7. (2) Petitioner has proffered that there will be no outdoor kennel runs and that all dogs will be leashed. b. Weaknesses: (1) Strict compliance with plan policy TR-9 _~._- regarding screening and buffering, and the screening and buffering ~_ _ __ requirements contained in the Ordinance will be difficult due to ""°'~ site contraints. (2) B-2 zoning permits wide variety of ~~4-L_ - ~ commercial uses which may not be a ppropriate for this location, ~'_ ,~~ but could be limited b a - __ y proffer on uses, including the extent of --- -- resiential use in conection with the Use Not Provided For Permit. `--~ (3) No proffer for signage has been made by the applicant. (4) _.,,~„Q Some additional noise could be created by the proposed use. _~,-sue- - __ - _:_.°, - 7 - 'JI~f2GI [C]IA BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ~'~~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~ ~ ~ ) wi thi n the '~~ ~ _ ., ) RDCONA4ENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ,~7 ~~~ _ , _ /~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~~ ~ , - WHEREAS, your Petitioner yy _ ,~'(~ ~ ~ G~c~ .C/ has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a pet ion to re one the above-referenced parcel of land from ~~(~ District to ~~ 2- ~- ~~.~,~ o~ ~-',s~~istrict for the purpose of ~ . WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, a s amended, did hold a public hearing on ~ ~ ~ 19 ~; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an oaportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recomunended to the Board of County Supervisors tY~t the rezoning be _ granted with a Use Not Provided for Permit v u U NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recomttrends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced ~rce1 of land be rezoned to B-2 with proffered conditions and with a Use Not Provided For Per mit The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt following recorded vote: and upon the AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None AgS~- None Respectfully submitted, .~~ ~~ Secreta y Roanoke County Planning Commission L'TRGINIA: BEFL~RE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A J~zX ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located y3,,~ Fa.~,~%,~ ~/~,y nTti~~e ~aE z~a/~ ) within the ~~~~ ~' Jr,'w~ ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~ ~ ~}~ - / -~~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PETITION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN,T7Y: ,~ , WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~ ~~%. ~T`" respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned unde~ the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as ---- ~ ;~ _ ~;~~. ' District. 3) The property is designated ~ ~ in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property, rezoned as - ~ District for the purpose of ,~~ -1 1J ~, e WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner respectfully requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, l' .,~i~~,,~ llZl . `~~~ ~~ ~" I ~' „ /--,r I / Petitioner ~ ;; 1 PETITIONER: CGARENCE DAVID SHEPHERD CASE NCAKBER: 16-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of Clarence David Shepherd to rezone a portion of a 0.739 acre tract from B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car sales business located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning CarQnission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use of property will be limited to used automobile sales. b. No outside overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. c. No on-pr~nises autanobile repairs shall be conducted. d. Maximum signage to be 2' x 3' and located at the entrance of the office for the uses car business which is located at the rear of the retail building. e. No more than 16 vehicles on site. f. There will be no billboard advertising. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS J Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~i Staff Report Other: ~~ ~ ~~~ Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary F/Ni3N Fcaoa Ao~ /.3~OG. /~O. OO -... N /O "5G ' i3' --~-- ~ - W E ti ``-''' SrR -+ / W Z v OFEQ \ C . ~'• ~~' ~ ~ NCH ~ D. J39 ACRES Q O / ~ SrRL.~M O O i7•a FicL `I 50 O' ` ~ l~ 1 RoBPo~,D l o '1 I Do 2(~uTO ~i , L.~O~. O' - ~ I 1 ~ Q ,~aopasE,o ,: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F,N F~ooa ~ : _.. .•. /00.00 I t-'0.o'SPaS~ ~ k.or ~ I I '.:~ /030. 1 / ~ r`aR . ~o, 5 CoNc. W.1~K ~ ~z~ ~I Q O ,~ I ~I o m -P%M 9B. B s.~.~. ~ W 5E r/~a ~ h M.N.' i'~ ~.: PaoaasEO "~ P.~RKINQ ' /COR C, m. 8. Assoc iarF S -.,. 7'$flU7o,Sf~lF_S. }d- I~ ~ ~J7 .. +.. . ` I ~ . I'~ I , I .' v~E r i.:ie~ .. .~ _._ Up, ,~ `a3d,r. NN 1, L~~vs O~ o ~. p~N n'yE,'~ i~. Pko'; , ~"'E.vrz~~~+' r..-.,; ,~~~ YO' SG ' E., /4T 00 ' ~~ir. iooi',~- 98,7 M~/~~ _ - / P..~ s~~ .N '~' N --- ---------- _ - Jam'/G s/ _.-_. _ ..._.._-- ~ 3D~ D/D .fNCE _ ~,.f EX~ ~ cps 5oo'-'a......----- -- -- - -_ /oo "7.~vER ~ (Nor re scvcs) (~Vor T S'eacE) - 9a R {~ NOjE~ ELEY.IJ/O.VS lj,~sEp ON AJ,f UME' p /OO.OO ~~EALT/.~ ~ ~~° ~aCK c. aESS '~~, , ° N SU VE R Z . /~- D CERTIF CATE No. ~-9~i~/ ~0~~ ~~~0~ ~ ,c~ .a ~ NO/ E ~ ,SO/G E/jOJ/ON ANp ,SaQ/,yE,~r CONJQOL ~ME~151/,QE9 J~'Ni14C /3E /N ACCORD.INCE jyirla /'/RG////A EQO1/ON ~,~Ep/ME,~~ CoN,ROG ~ANp/d0o SU~C'YEy ~As AMENOtO Jo D,, j~) // F02 / yY/~..C lA M F. yVQ ,D OF A O. J3 9 AC~PE T~Pq C~" 9/J'UA~"E O/t/ Tf/E !'~E,5J' S/OE U. S. RJ' // - /y/G C /AM60,V /QOAO 3/jU.IrE //t/ THE /3/G C /CK MAG/sJ'ER/AC O/61.e/Cl' -2- OF nvn ~ ~~ 33 \ t ... ' IBL a ..... ~ .. _ '••w I I ~, ~ ~ S,- ~. •, ` ~~ ~ w b 1 M~°Mb us R11 62 i 1 1 -~ i\ t , ~ e 1 B2 ~" .I \ 32 • L 1 , 1 .• .. w 3 II w 9 1 9 • 3,1 R3 . loo O g a w. ~ ~ 82 1 " ~ ~ ~ I ~~ _ J / ~ s _ i $4 1 1 ~ ~ ]0 _ E1~ .. • w B ~ 40.E R3 1 _ ~ g `O r B /b~~ ,~ ' 3 , 1 t 3 $ 6 ~ 1 ----- o f.saK s.....es...»r t S 4 R3 ! 1 ~ ~ O ~ e ~ .~....,... ..~ r r. A ~' , .. _ ~ ~ tL w H ~ ' 16 ~ r 7 I2 '26 1 ~ ,~' ' B21 1 O ,• \\; w $ I< ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 3---- ~ ~ e-----2`-------- ~ u ~ .B9 ~ u ~ . ~ O a / ~ 4B3E r r 8 2 3 s o „ $ 1 1 s c F pd o ~ K.I B3 r w e 6 0 24 14 --- \ ~.~ S ~r 1 e "' ~ ' ----- 6 O 1 O 3 1 0 / 22 Ig '' ia~J ,, _ 9 - ; fin.. F \ / e \ B « 3 x r Bwr.Y 1 1 ....r...r n...c 2 i5 R 3 2 ' ., p , / - \\~ ~ 6? ~ ~ ~ \ ~ O 102 'All properties zoned R-1 ~ ~ \~ ~ \ \ RE unless otherwise note ~ d. _ n i/ 1 ` 1 1 4N ~ r `' ROANOKE COUNTY Clarence David Shepherd DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-2 to B-3 ne 4 A 4 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'PY A ~.73o acre parcel of land, ) generally located 6?~_g ) `~Tilliarr~son Roa~.~ ) within the Holli~ls ) FINAL ORDER o00o Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # 27. i8-1-5-5008 ) ~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) "r; C !~'"` TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Clarcizce Davie Shet~'nerd did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from P-2 District to B-3 District for the purpose of Uses Car Sales Lot anc I3-3 only nor t'i~~ lct portion WHRREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5 , 19 88 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proferred conditions on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel ~~ ~R_~_ ~ ~ and recorded in Deek Book 1171 Page 434 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-2 - Business District to B-3 Business District. - 7 - Legal Description of Property: ~~~ w Being a portion of tYl:. property at 6%i8 6~Tiiliamson Roac in the Hollins Ma~yisterial District anc begir~nirr on the ~~esteriy sid` of ~villlamson Roac, aT:~; at a point 7.6 fe=et ~~ct~rly parallel of line 5:~0`56'E. and i0 f°et southerly ar~d parallel lire N79' 04' E. , thenc tiaith a lin=~ S _0° 56 ° E. 48 feet to a point; thence wit:~T a ?irLe S79°04'W. 95 feet to a point t'_~cncc~ with a line S10°56'E. ~0 feet to tl:c Yyall of the tuilding of C.M.B. ASSOC1ateS. , tilenC wlti'1 a 11riE' frcrn t'_'12 westerly ~~uii Of C.M.B. ~1~~soClatQs S79°04'Vv'. i0 f ~`t to a peir.t; thence ~~ith .. line Ni0° 56'Vd. i05 feet to a pcirt; thence with. a lire` N79°o4'E. J_17 feet tc tiii' point of ;~eir~ninc,-. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~~.., _ ,Clerk Roanoke Co ty Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections - 8 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y ~~, ~',= A 0. 7;g acre parcel of land, ) generally located 671.8 Williarlson Road within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 2.7.8-'-5-5008 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. 'In THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y: PROFFER OF rnt~mTmrnuc ~B~_ Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Clai~l'iCe Davic: she~her~' hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~~~~~x~x~xixx~x~~~xx~r~~~~?~~~x~a~"xx~ 1) Use of property will be limited to used automobile sales. 2) No outside overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 3) No on-premises automobile repairs shall be conducted. 4) Maximum signage to be 2' x 3' and located at the entrance of the office for the used car business which is located at the rear of the retail building. 5) No more than 16 vehicles on site 6) 'T'here will be no billboard advertising. Respectfully submitted, ' /) ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~f..~ Petitioner - 9 - CASE NUMBER: 16-4/88 REVIEWED BY: LIZ PARCELL STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: CLARENCE DAVID SHEPHERD DATE: APRIL 5, 1988 Petition of Clarence David Shepherd to rezone a portion of a 0.739 acre tract from B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car sales business located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone 6,470 sq.ft. of a 0.739 acre tract from B-2, General Commercial to B-3, Special Commercial District. Purpose of petitioner's request is to allow the sale of used cars. Concept plan indicates and petitioner has proffered that no more than 16 cars will be displayed on the property. No new construction and no expansion of the existing building is propos- ed. Petitioner plans to utilize 250 sq.ft. at the rear of the auto parts building as an office for the use car sales business. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe purpose more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-3 zoning district permits a variety of intensive commercial uses. Petitioner has proffered use of property to be limited to used automobile sales. b. Special Exception Permit from Board of Supervisors required. c. VDOT will require a new entrance permit. d. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS _ a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Gravel and grass. Existing structure on remaining portion of 0.739 acre parcel. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated as a high growth area. Within an urban service area. b. General area is developed with mixed commercial, office, institutional, and residential uses. Property is adjacent to US Route 11. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through. 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 4 - .. ~. ~ ~`' RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive~Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. General commercial uses are encouraged with high compatibility in Core areas. Proposed use is consistent with the following land use policies: C-1 (encourage the development of intensive, mixed- use urban development); C-2 (serve each core area by an arterial or higher grade street); C-3 (link the county cores with cities and town by public transit service); and portions of C-4 (coordinate the design of commercial sites). Policy C-5 will be accomplished during site plan review. Policies C-6 and C-7 are not applicable. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Commercial, residential and institutional. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Densely developed mix of residential and commercial land uses. 3 d. Site Layout: Petitioner plans to begin parking used cars in graveled area. If business expands, petitioner will expand graveled area into existing grassed area but no more than 16 vehicles will be displayed. 3 e. Architecture: No buildings are located within the 6,470 sq.ft. area. No changes to building on remaining portion of the 0.739 acre tract are planned. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. 2 g. Amenities: No impact. - 2 h. Natural Features: No impact. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Property adjoins US Route 11 which has an approximate ADT of 16,415 vehicles. Traffic generated will be less than 100 vehicles per day. 3 j. Circulation: Direct access from primary highway. Internal circulation enhanced with road going around building. 2 2 2 2 UTILITIES k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE m. Basin: No increased negative effect. n. Floodplain: Area of minimal flooding according to US Department of HUD Flood Insurance Rate Maps. - 5 - r PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection:: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $60,000 (existing building) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $10,000 - Total Employees: 1 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $100 new revenue. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Limited to 6 sq.ft. and will be located at the entrance of the used car sales office which is located at the rear of the existing building. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. Petitioner's request is consistent with Core land use policies with the exception of portions of C-4 (coordinate vehicular site to site movement). 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Accessible by way of primary highway. (2) Minimal impact on urban utilities and services. (3) Specific land use has been proffered. (4) Petitioner has limited number of cars to be located on the site. (5) Petitioner has proffered no outside storage of inoperative or junk vehicles. (6) Petitioner has proffered no on-premises automobile repair. (7) Petitioner has proffered Signage to be limited to 6 sq.ft. (8) Consistent with Core land use policies. b. Weaknesses: (1) Minimal revenue and employment generated from property already zoned for retail business. - 6 - V IKGIIv3A: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.739 acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~;~~ ) 'v~7illiamscn Road within the N,-,~ ~ ; Y,~. ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 27.8-?-5-5008 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) RDCONY~7.VDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Clarenco David Shephcrc~ has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land fran B-2 District to B-3 District for the purpose of used Car saps Lot any': B-3 only fcr the lot L~orticn WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Ccmmission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on April 5, , 19 88 ; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recoirnnended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recotnmlends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-3, Business, with proffered conditions The above action was adopted on motion of Carolyn Flippen following recorded vote: AyE$; Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, and upon the ~~ ~ ~~,~ Secretary Roanoke County~Planninq Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.739 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 6718 > Wi 1 1 i am~;nn Rn~r', ) within the Hollins ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 27.18-1-5-s008 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. > TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Clarence DdVl~ Sl. p~i~~rc. respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as ~-2 District. 3) The property is designated ~~rP in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as R_-~ District for the purpose of Usec Car salty Lct B-3 only ~cr the lot ~aortion WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in rnunbe.r 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner respectfully requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Petitioner A P P E A R A N C E PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~ R E Q U E S T ~8 8 9 ~c-~ , ~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the .rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2• Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPOR'T`ING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: r~~0.V~~ ADDRESS: j~ s '~' ¢.._. PHONE : Q'j "~- ~ S PLEASE NOTE; (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ' _ _ ,, .'_ PETITIONER: CLIFFORD CURRY CASE N[MBEEt: 15-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 26, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of Clifford Curry to amend the conditions on a 5.57 acre tract to construct a retirement facility, located on the east side of VA Route 706 approximately 0.1 mile south of its intersection with Route 419 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'I~ORS a. Amenities: Based on County parking requirements, proposal is 47 stalls short of minimum necessary (petitioner is offering 63 stalls for 110 units). Final site plan will require extensive parking modifications unless a variance is acquired. b. Natural Features: Steep slope from east to west across entire parcel severely limits total amount of developable property. Proffered screening will provide substantial buffer not currently available along eastern and south borders and will support existing woodland on remaining boundaries. c. Basin: Ore Branch. County Engineering staff recommends the development of a drainage system from petitioner's property to 419 and maximum 20 foot vertical fill slopes at 2:1 or flatter without benches. VDOT has also expressed concern over additional drainage onto Routes 419 and 706. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. A maximum 110 suite retirement facility will be constructed following the existing entrance road and parking lot. b. Type D screening and buffering or its equivalent by modification will be installed on all property borders. (Natural growth will be salvaged to maximum extent possible.) c. Final plan will be in substantial conformance with concept plan. d. One concrete sign no greater than 24 sq.ft. will be installed; no other signage will be constructed. e. Architecture will display brick and wood siding exterior over wood frame construction. f. Interior traffic circulation will be one-way and will be so designated on the property. g. A sprinkler system will be installed serving entire facility. h. A drainage system will be constructed from subject property to VA 419. i. A licensed geotechnical engineer will be hired to conduct soils test on the site, write a report, review the working drawings for compliance with recommendations, and inspect all the earth work. [Staff stated that the County engineering staff had recommended that more stringent slope development proffers be offered limiting the finished cut and fill to a 2:1 slope. Petitioner was not willing to make this proffer.] }:; , 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the request with amended proffers. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS ~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: ~~~ ~ ~t~ Robert Stalzer, Planning Commission Secretary - 2 - ~~-~~ _! i~ 1 .. /. ~ / ~ ~. ~ e !i ~ ~ .tl ` t[~ ~ aJ 7 0 .: .. '. O wC ~ / W .~~~~'~. ~ .\` ` ~,• ~1. ~ ~ ~ ~ -ice _f - -~=•~~`•~ =^ ~ P; \ ~ ~ ~~ / V' ~ ~ ~ is ~r jj~~~ t~ -.l '~, /(~j ~~ , ~... I ~~ ~ . ~Ji~~ ~~ - 3 ~ <~ ~ : ~: ~>~ ~ 7 0 O; ~- Z_ w w o U ~= Z o W o N o W ~ ~ F... Z v W< ~ W W W Y 0 Z Q O o ~~ ~..., _ R Z W ~S ~ :~ Q °~ o F- o xR o x• n Q " `~ ~ ~ 2~ ~.yb _ ... . a Y. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~:,~~ ~~,, - 4 - s ~ _ -_ ~ . O ~ ~ ~ o . i . . . a i : - . - a ---- . ...--... O O J LL S H O N Z Q W --~ U z d Z o O 0 ' J ~ o IL L1! J ~ o Q a U _ ~ } Z F. w W _~ f"' W O w O Y J O W _~ Q = O ~ ~ O ~~E f.. _ R ~ ~S 'o ~_ ~ o w ~ xR o :~ ! d ~ O 26 n J ~ :~ d _ - f a~ p>.~I ' t ~. 1 ij ~~~~+ O O J LL Z O U ~~ Q N N N Z W W h m - 5 - --VICINITY MAP+- - -, ---=_ _~ y i _/` _ - ~ ~ - _ ` 3 ~: __-- - s / - ___-_ l.3klp en4~lo -- _ - o' R3 a~9 ~----_= 3 / _ _.___ R 3 1 ' _- _. -_ f.xl 4 _ _ ~-. _~ .max VY 1~0N~Q_ 7~6 ~ / 7 1 ----- _. ~ __ , ~~ I _.__ --_ _ ,3 4y ' a.~ j R3 4a. •.Sp4 1 R ,~-~, e ~. ~ ~ S ~.. i ~~~ ys'/aba~;; ao 1 c5o~~/g~~~~;~s ~. cmrsi~A°~4 T ~yt \~r •>u cw,~~ ~ , Tvf .+~=' x ,y,~.•.••~0.D eTUM'h iti '-`~ t ~. '~ .. , , 4\i`` I 1 4 9 A l IS ~~• I7 I.N~~ - Iz R3 ~ q •.~ , 97 1 ~O4 F 1 ° ° 1 ~ e n B2 R3 • ' s., ~ ~ 2 • 19 •~ ` ' a R3 • R3 ~~ ' R3 R3 :: ~:`~, ; q S , 1 1 N ~ O t 1 y~,k 1 23 •~ 1 r SS 1 R3 ' R3 t L004p Ixs4p 1 R3 1 34 ~ 26 R3 zci. ?~. . e374p x.ro.~u 1 t 1 1 caNo b b' ~I 119a4p R3acx..c '°"' • 1 72 C, 1 B3 s R 3 • .. R3 ~ 3? . 34 ¢ss ;a3 u xM4 1 °~ 0p4 c _R3 1 1 351 ' ~~ g 1 . • All properties z 1 oned B-2 ... n s Dom- unless otherwise noted. , S - 6 - ~ T L ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT e ~e /a / i Nf :rbrt ,n ~ ~.uro r~nu /' / 6S~I:nrl Nears N C 419 /~ i Q :~ ~1; l i 4', f ;~».;° f Clifford Curry I Amendment of Conditions t 8 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COrJNTY A 5.97 acre parcel of land, ) generally located east of VA secondary ) rte 706 & 0.1 mile south of VA primary rte 419 within the ('.,+.e_Snri ng ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.20-1-51 ) Part B-2 and R-3 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) °' ~,:_ FTt~ra,r. nRn~ ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: U v 0 U 0 +~ b 0 a. ~a ~~~ ~~ WHEREAS, your Petitioner _ Clifford Curry, Architect did petition the Board of County Supervisors to ame tl~ec~}o~~,enced parcel cu~ntly zoned B-2 D].striCt $~xxxxxx~A~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~~~~~~~ for the purpose of constructing a 110 suite retirement residencef and to acquire a Special Exception for the operation of a home for adults as stipulated under B-2 district requirements. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on April 5, ~ lg 88, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be aPProved with proffers on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the .aforementionedtparcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77,20-1- r and recorded in Deek Book see below) Pa e and 1 amended j g egally descri'oed below, be r~~~i xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~~~lr#~~x a portion of 9.99 acres deed book 1263 page 147,8 1172 0372 1098 0504 ,, and a portion of 1.09 acres deed book 1263 page 1478 1175 0792 436 0380 - 11 - ~~ ~. 3~ Legal Description of Property: Being 6,10 acres, situated in Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, said 6.10 acres, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point common to said 6.10 acres, the east right-of-way line of Virginia Secondary Route 706 (Elm View Road), and property of Tom Penn, et als; thence N 9° 03' 50" W, 115.71 feet along the line common to said 6.10 acres and said east right-of-way line of Virginia Secondary Route 706 to a point; thence N 5° 15' 45" W, 41.24 feet to a point; thence along the line common to said 6.10 acres and property of Avenham Associates as recorded in Deed Book 1125, Page 477 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following 3 courses and distances, S 52° 00' E, 40.00 feet to a point, N f9° 37' 10" E, 232.90 feet to a point; N 45° 42' E, 500.00 feet to a point; said point being common to said 6.10 acres, said property of Avenham Associates and property of Herbert J. Brown and Tessie M. Brown; thence along the line common to said 6.10 acres and said property of Brown the following 2 courses and. .distances, S 33° 21' E, 21.72 feet to a point, S 53° 33' E, 250.00 feet to a point; thence along a rezoning line,. S 35° 13' 17" W, 675.60 feet to a point; thence along the line common. to 6.10 acres and said property of Tom Penn, et als, N 68° 56' W, 438.37 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing a computed acreage of 6.10 acres. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AY~~ Supervisors Robers, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~ e_~D Lt -~' `r • ~ ~i ~~ -n Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections VIRGINIA: - ~ > BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 5'97 acre parcel of land, generally located east of VA secondary) rte 706 & 0.1 mile south of VA rimar ate 419 PROFFER within the -Cave Spring ) -- OF Magisterial District, and ) ~ OONDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # 77.20-1-51 ) Part 6-2 and R-3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Y1 Ta THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANO KE CO(JN'I'Y ; w Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq, of the Code of Virginia and Sec . 21-LOSE of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Clifford Curry o , Architect u o hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Vir ini th ~' , g a e following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: o o a. A maximum 110 suite retirement facility will be constructed followin existing entrance the d a b• g roa and parking lot. Type D screening and buffering or it a+ a s installed on all ro ~ulvalent by modification will be P perty borders. (Natural ~ growth will be salvaged to maximum extent possible.) c. d. Final plan will be in substantial conformance with concept plan. One concrete sign no greater than 24 sq.ft, will be installed; no other signage will be constructed e. . Architecture will display brick and wood siding exterior over wood frame construction. f. Interior traffic circulation will be one-way and will be so designated on th property. g. h, e A sprinkler system will be installed serving entire facility. A drainage system will be i, constructed from sub'ect A licensed geotechnical engineer will be hiredJto co site d ~ i t J 9 1 n , wr u ct soils test on the te a report, review the working drawings for compliance with recommendations and i , nspect all the earth work. Respectfully submitted, ~ - i~ Petitioner - 12 - R~. ,~* ... j; STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 15-4/88 PETITIONER: CLIFFORD CURRY REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: APRIL 5, 1988 Petit-ion of Clifford Curry to amend the conditions on a 5.57 acre tract to construct a retirement facility, located on the east side of VA Route 706 approximately 0.1 mile south of its intersection with Route 419 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Amendment of conditions on a parcel currently zoned B-2, General Commercial and Special Exception request to construct and operate a 110 unit home for adults. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 zoning district permits homes for adults, provided a Special Exception Permit is acquired. The ordinance defines a home for adults as a facility that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping, and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are usually functionally impaired and socially isolated but otherwise in good health and able to maintain a semi-independent lifestyle, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT reports that a new commercial entrance permit will be required due to the proposed change in use. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Southwestern tip o.f property is flat; remaining + 9 acres slopes steeply (+20$ slope) toward VA Route 419. b. Ground Cover: Existing metal storage building with two accompanying satellite dishes within a chain link fence an approximately one acre of graveled parking area; remaining + 9 acres wooded (predominantly deciduous>. - 4. AREA CHARACTERISTLCS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated as a medium to high growth area currently receiving urban services. b. General area-is developed with multifamily residential and mixed commercial uses along VA 419. Woodland and very sparse single family residential uses are found south and east of subject property. 5. LAND USE IMPACT .ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 7 - .. ~'~~ ~ RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Petitioner's site lies partially within a critical slope area (more than 20$) in which the Resource Protection Guide strongly discourages development. Middle to high density residential uses (6-12 units per acre) are limited with moderate compatibility in development areas. Proposed use averages 11 units per acre. Proposal is consistent with policies D-1 (manage new residential growth according to public service capacity); D-4 (promote clustering of multifamily housing units); and D-8 (permit multifamily development if exceptional housing design and site planning techniques achieve compatibility). Policy D-7 encourages development of parks and recreation facilities (among others) to benefit new community residents. Such activity centers are planned on petitioner's property (consisting of multipurpose, game-tv, craft, and exercise rooms) and limited outdoor walking areas. Policy D-9 encourages direct access onto a collector or arterial street where a residential project increases density significantly. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Woodland, multifamily residential and retail commercial to northwest 3 c. Neighboring Area:- See surrounding land in addition to Tanglewood retail center to northwest. 3 d. Site Layout: Proffered concept plan ensures compliance with policies D-l, D-4, and D-8. Limited usable outdoor recreation facilities makes compliance with D-7 suspect. Without direct access to a collector or arterial, compliance with D-9 is not possible. 2 e. Architecture: .Wood frame with brick and wood siding proposed; not secured by proffer. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: Through a combination of existing natural growth and new landscaping measures, proffered type D screening and buffering will be in place along all property boundaries. Petitioner has proposed a well-maintained lawn, a partially covered patio and walking areas. 4 g. Amenities: Based on County parking requirements, proposal is 47 stalls short of minimum necessary (petitioner is offering 63 stalls for 110 units). Final site plan will require extensive parking modifications unless a variance is acquired. 4 h. Natural Features: Steep slope from east to west across entire parcel severely limits total amount of developable property. Proffered screening will provide substantial buffer not currently available along eastern and south borders and will support existing woodland on remaining boundaries. - 8 - ~' ~° ~_ TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation is 363 vehicles per day (3.3 trip ends per unit at 110 units). VA 419 current ADT is 42,110 vehicles in this area, and VA 706 (Elm View Road) current ADT is 735 vehicles. VDOT and Fifth Planning District Commission trarSsportation engineers expect no adverse capacity impact at the recently signalized 419/706 intersections. 3 J• Circulation: Indirect access to VA 419 via secondary Route 706. Petitioner will utilize existing entrance. Internal circulation is well designed considering topographic constraints; however, one way travel should be secured by proffer as close as to the intersection of the facility entrance and VA 706, possible UTILITIES ? k• Water: Adequate source and distribution. capacity tank rests on southeastern border of5pet000 oner~s property. County access to storage tank must be protected during and after development. Engineering staff has recommended all buildings be sprinklered or constructed to meet fire flow requirements of the water standard. Proffer requested. 3 1. Sewer: Treatment and transmission available within 50 petitioner's property. 0 feet of DRAINAGE 4 m. Basin: Ore Branch. development of a drainageusystemgfromrpegitionerrscommends the 419 and maximum 20 foot vertical fill slopes at 2:lro pflatte~ without benches. VDOT has also expressed concern over additional-drainage onto Routes 419 and 706. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES ? o. Fire Protection: Fire and rescue regulations require that fire lanes be provided for and designated on site. ? P. Rescue: Within established service standard.- 3 q• Parks and Recreation: On site indoor recreation facilities include multipurpose, game and tv, craft, and exercise rooms. Outdoor facilities include walking path and lawn. N/A r. School: TAX BASE ? s• - Land and Improvement Value: Ex ected: - - Current: $x;-530 p $3.6 million - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $990,000 - Total Employees: 15 - Total revenue to the County/year: Expected: $43,696 Current: $3,530 - 9 - . , „~ ~. ~' :'~'r~ ~..~ ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 3 u. Water: See drainage-floodplain. 3 v. Soils: See drainage-floodplain. 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Constructed of concrete with approximate dimensions 18" x 72". Not secured by proffer. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and with policies D-l, D-4, D-8 and to a certain extent, D-7 (outdoor recreation is limited to walking). Petitioner's proposal is not in agreement with policy D-9 (no direct access onto a collector or arterial). See "Land Use Compatibility--Comprehensive Plan." 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal falls within density limits of 6-12 units/acre accepted in Development areas. (2) Attractive architecture, extensive landscaping,- and very limited signage should provide an aesthetic asset to-the community. (3) Proposed facility would act as an effective buffer between Route 419 businesses and vacant proper-ties to the east. b. Weaknesses: (1) Resource Protection Guide policies strictly oppose development on critical slopes. (2) Considerable doubt surrounds the need for additional homes for adults in Roanoke County. (3) The potential for parking and drainage problems is substantial. - 10 - VI~tGI Nla BEFORE THE BOARD OE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ..1 4~~ ~. A ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located east of VA secondary) rte 706 & 0.1 mile south of VA primary )rte 419 within the Cave Spring Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 77.20-1-51 Part B-2 and R-3 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. REC7(.Y~A~IDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Clifford Curry, Architect has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to ~~~~ condition on the aoove-re~erenced parcel of land ~pxx~x~ currently zoned B-2 District ~~xxxxx~~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~~~; for the purpose of construct a 110 suite retirement residence. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, a s amended, did hold a public hearing on April 5, , 19 88 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recomzrended to the Board of County Supervisors that the ~~~~x conditions be amended NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land currently zoned B-2 with amended conditions b.e granted The above action was adopted on motion of following recorded vote: Don Witt AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead ~yS; None ABSENT: None and upon the Respectfully submitted, ._~ ,~~~ '~ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEE'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUI~PY A 5.97 acre parcel of land, ) generally located east of VA secondary) rte 706 & 0.1 mile south of VA primary )rte 419 within the Cave Spring ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.20-1-51 ) Part B-2 and R-3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Clifford Curry, Architect respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced tercel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-2 District. 3) The property is designated Development in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4 ) Your Petitioner now desires to wend . the~co~n~~ons~~~ ~ ~ ~~ xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~3~$p~~$ for the purpose of constructing a 110 suite retirement residence. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner respectfully requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Petitioner .,, ACTION # ITEM NUMBER yr' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS O.F ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request to amend the Land Use Plan Map from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition for a 0.678 acre parcel located at 6024 Williamson Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The subject parcel was rezoned to M-1 conditional in February, 1988. At that time, staff noted to both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors that the property was incorrectly designated in 1985 when the Land Use Plan Map was prepared. The property was rezoned with the understanding that the Secretary to the Planning Commission would petition both the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission for a Land Use Plan Map amendment to correct the error. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Attached is a memorandum of explanation, petition, recommendation and final order. Also attached is a vicinity map. The Roanoke County Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the Board of Supervisors that this amendment be approved. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative No. 1: The Board of Supervisors approves this amendment to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan Map. Alternative No. 2: The Board of Supervisors does not approve this amendment to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan Map. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this amendment of the Roanoke County Land Use Plan Map. If the amendment is not approved, the existing land use will be nonconforming to the Land Use Plan Map. SUBMITTED BY: Rob St lzer Director of Planning APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------- ACTION Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers FINAL ORDER `. WHII2EAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on April 26, 19 88, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the amendment to the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Develognent Plan be Approved on April 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 38.06-6-2 in Deed Book 698 Page 29 and legally described below, frccn Neighborhood Conservation to Transition Legal Description of Property: a~ ~~. ~_" ;= ~' ~'' BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of U.S. Route No. 11, 100.0 ft. (erroneously shown as "11 ft." in previous deed), southerly from the intersection of the westerly side of Route 11 and the southerly side of route 623, both extended• thence with a division line between Lots 12-B and 12-C, S. 78° It 30" W. 200.17 ft. to an iron on the line of Lot 11; thence N. 0° 0' 30" W. 222.25 ft. to an old iron on route 623; thence with the southerly side of Route 623, S. 64° 40' E. 181.29 ft. (erroneously shown as "193.73 ft." in previous deed), to the beginning of a. curve; thence with a curve to the right, whose radius is 25 ft., an arc distance of 23.09 ft. to a point on the westerly side of Route 11; thence with Route 11, S. 11° 58' 30" E. 87.56 ft. to the place of BEGINNING, and BEING all of Lot 12-C, according to a survey made for Captain's Grove Corporation showing a division of Lot 12, Block 1, Captain's Grove, which survey was made by T.P. Parker, S.C.E., July 16, 1962, attached to and amde a part of the Deed recorded in Deed Book 698,. page 29, at page 31, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and BEING the same property conveyed to Samuel E. Peters by Deed recorded in Deed Book 698, page 29, as hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use Map be changed accordingly. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson following recorded vote: and upon the AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~ ep u~y Clerk cc: Rob Stalzer, Director of l~an°ning an~ ~orid gf Supervisors John Willey, Real Estate Assessor Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections and recorded be redesignated F~NDNIENT OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY LAND USE PLAN A Before the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County 0.678 acre parcel of land, generally located within the at 6024 Williamson Road Hollins Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 38.06-6-2 Roanoke County Tax Records. in the PETITION To the Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, the Secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Commission respectfully files this petition in accordance with the Code of VA of 1950, as amended and would respectfully show the following: 1) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as M-1, Industrial District. 2) The property is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 3) Your Petitioner now desires to redesignate this property as Transition Respectfully su}amitted, ~A ~ Petitioner RDCONID4ENDATION WHEREAS, the petitioner was referred to the Planning Ccitunission, which after proper legal notice required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, held a public hearing on April 5, 1988 Whereas all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be heard. The Planning Commission recommends to the County Board of Supervisors that the above referenced parcel of land be redesignated fran Neighborhood Conservation to Transition in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan on the motion of Carolyn Flippen and the following recorded vote: py~; Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ~~; None Respectfully sula~mitted, -- ~ A f,,, Vim' _> c''~ ,F~' ,~~ M E M O R A N D U M T0: Roanoke County Planning Commission FROM: Liz Parcell DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Land Use Map Amendment Request Please find attached a petition to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors from the Secretary of the Planning Commission requesting a land use map amendment. A rezoning request from American Drum to rezone the subject parcel in December, 1987, prompted the staff to pursue the request. It was observed during analysis of the request that the property was incorrectly designated in 1985 when the map was developed. The request is to amend the designation of a 0.678 acre parcel located at 6024 Williamson Road on the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. The reasons for the amendment include the following: 1. Property along Williamson Road from the Roanoke City limits to the intersection with Route 117 is designated either Core, Transition, or Surface Water and Flood Hazard with the exception of the subject parcel. 2. Existing zoning along that same portion of Williamson Road is either B-2 or B-3 with the exception of two parcels zoned M-l. The subject property is currently zoned M-l. 3. Areas were designated Neighborhood Conservation where established family neighborhoods were delineated. The subject parcel is not within an established single family neighborhood. The effect of the amendment on surrounding properties will be positive in that the Transition designation would be consistent with the designation of the adjoining properties fronting Williamson Road. The subject parcel also meets all of the Transition land use determinants. These land use determinants include the following: 1. Highway Frontage - locations where properties have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street. 2. Land Use Pattern - locations where a strip pattern of development has occurred or where future development pressures may cause such a pattern to occur. 3. Existing Zoning - locations where strip commercial zoning has been instituted. 4. Surrounding Land Use - locations which serve as logical buffer strips between conflicting land use groups. 5. Topography - locations which are physically oriented toward the major frontage street. 6. Urban Sector - locations within the projected urban service area. Your review and recommendation of this land use map amendment is appreciated. ,• ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~J~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Resolution pursuant to Section 15.1-238(e) of the ]_950 Code of Virginia, as amended, setting forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter upon certain properties and to take certain sanitary sewer easements in connec- tion with the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project COUN'T'Y ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 15..1-238(e) of the .1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, provides for a notice and public hearing by the Board of Supervisors to authorize immediate entry upon real estate and condemnation thereof. In order to complete the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project, the following sanitary sewer ease- ments must be condemned: °Tanglewood West Fair Market Value - $2,561.00 °Smithey & Boynton Fair Market Value - $4,219.00 °T. R. Leslie Fair Market Value - $2,949.00 Notices by registered mail were given to the property owners i_n question. There notices also included the offers of fair mar- ket value as indicated by the appraisal reports. This procedure is a necessary first step to commence condemnation proceedings. Pub]__ic notices of this public hearing were published in the Roanoke Times and World News on April 12, 1988, and April 1.9, 1988. ALTERNA'I'IVES AND IMPACTS: $9,729.00 plus legal costs and expenses for condemnation actions and expert witness fees. Utility bond funds are being used for the sanitary sewer acquisition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the proposed resolution be adopted by the Board after the required public hearing. Respectfully submitted, ~'~. , Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney j, ------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN`1'Y, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~I'O ENTER UPON CERTAIN PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Pro- ject is being undertaken by the County of Roanoke to allow for the elimination of the Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant and provide for long-term sewer capacity for the Back Creek sewershed; and 2. That in order to complete this project, certain sanitary sewer easements are needed and more particularly des- cribed: a. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of land across the property of Tanglewood West and more particularly described on the attached appraisal. report as located on the rear property line and containing 2,563-square feet and being shown on the attached plat pre- pared by the Roanoke County Depart- ment of Public Facilities dated June 1, 1987. Together with a ten (10) foot wide temporary construction easement more particularly described on the attached appraisal report as contain- ing 1,282 square feet. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $2,561.00, such compensation and dam- ages, if any, having been offered the property owner. b. A fifteen (15) foot wide strip of land across the property of Smithey & Boynton, P.C., successor-in-interest to Atelier, Inc., and more particu]_ar- ly described on the attached apprai- sal report as running along the front property line and containing 4,725 square feet and being shown on the attached plat prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Public Facili- ties dated October 21, 1987. Together with a ten (10) foot wide temporary construction easement more particularly described on the attached appraisal report and contain- ing 3,150 square feet. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $4,219.00, such compensation having been offered the property owner. c. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of land across the property of T. R. Leslie and more particularly described on the attached appraisal report as an irregular shaped easement located at the corner of Ogden Road and Route 419 and containing 1,010 square feet and being shown on the attached plat prepared by the Roanoke County Depart- ment of Public Facilities dated December 30, 1987. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $2,949.00, such compensation having been offered the property owner. 2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take such property and commence said sanitary sewer improvements in order to replace the Starkey Sewage ~I'reat- ment F~lant due to the economic infeasibility to upgrade the p]_ant to satisfy the proposed requirements and regulations of the State Water Control Board and provide long-term sewer capacity for the hea]_th, safety, and welfare of its citizens and to thereafter ~~ M ~ institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said sanitary sewer easements; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-1.19 through Section 33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made and provided by law. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 42688-9 PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Pro- ject is being undertaken by the County of Roanoke to allow for the elimination of the Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant and provide for long-term sewer capacity for the Back Creek sewershed; and 2. That in order to complete this project, certain sanitary sewer easements are needed and more particularly des- cribed: a. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of land across the property of Tanglewood West and more particularly described on the attached appraisal report as located on the rear property line and containing 2,563-square feet and being shown on the attached plat pre- pared by the Roanoke County Depart- ment of Public Facilities dated June 1, 1987. Together with a ten (10) foot wide temporary construction easement more particularly described on the attached appraisal report as contain- ing 1,282 square feet. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $2,561.00, such compensation and dam- ages, if any, having been offered the property owner. b. A fifteen ( 15 ) foot wide strip of land across the property of Smithey & Boynton, P.C., successor-in-interest to Atelier, Inc., and more particular- ly described on the attached apprai- sal report as running along the front property line and containing 4,725 square feet and being shown on the attached plat prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Public Facili- ties dated October 21, 1987. Together with a ten (10) foot wide temporary construction easement more particularly described on the attached appraisal report and contain- ing 3,150 square feet. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $4,219.00, such compensation having been offered the property owner. c. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of land across the property of T. R. Leslie and more particularly described on the attached appraisal report as an irregular shaped easement located at the corner of Ogden Road and Route 419 and containing 1,010 square feet and being shown on the attached plat prepared by the Roanoke County Depart- ment of Public Facilities dated December 30, 1987. The fair market value of the afore- said interest to be acquired is $2,949.00, such compensation having been offered the property owner. 2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take such property and commence said sanitary sewer improvements in order to replace the Starkey Sewage Treat- ment Plant due to the economic infeasibility to upgrade the plant to satisfy the proposed requirements and regulations of the State Water Control Board and provide long-term sewer capacity for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens and to thereafter 2 institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said sanitary sewer easements; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-119 through Section 33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made and provided by law. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: J ~' Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. of Can. Services & Dev. Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities 3 \, ACTION # ~ `"~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, BY THE ADDJTION OF A NEW ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES; SUCH NEW ARTICLE VIII IMPOSING A TAX ON CERTAIN FOOD AND BEVERAGES SOLD IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 58.1-3833, CODE OF VIRGINIA (1950), AS AMENDED, AND PROVIDING FOR THE AMOUNT OF SUCH TAX, PROCEDURES FOR COLI,ECTlON, DU'PIES OF SELLERS AND DUTIES OF LOCAL OFFICIALS WI'1'H RESPECT TO SUCH TAX, ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, CIVIL PENALTIES FOR LATE PAYMENT, MISDEMEANOR PEN- ALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE, EXEMPTIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assembly enacted Section 58.1-3833 which authorized certain counties to adopt a local ordinance imposing a tax on food and beverages in an amount not to exceed four (40) percent of the amount charged after a pub]_ic hearing by unanimous vote. The earliest date such an ordinance could be effective is July 1, 1988. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors, staff has adver- tised the proposed ordinance imposing a tax on prepared food and beverages in the newspaper on March 29, 1988, and April 5, 1988. These advertisements gave notice of a public hearing on April 12, 1988, on this matter, which has been held. The first reading on this proposed ordinance is scheduled for_ April 26, 1988, and the second reading on this ordinance i_s scheduled for May ].0, 1988. Attached you will find a draft copy of this proposed ordinance as well as a copy of the legal notice. This ordinance is substantially consistent with Roanoke City's ordinance, which should minimize confusion and ease en- forcement within the Roanoke Valley. ~~ The goal of this proposed ordinance is to provide a fair, equitable, and consistent tax treatment to all participants from this tax on prepared food and beverages. Beginning July 1, 1988, this tax will be levied on the "purchaser" of all prepared food and beverages. "Food" is defined as "any and all edible refresh- ments or nourishment, liquid or otherwise, including alcoholic beverages, purchased in or from a restaurant or from a caterer, except snack foods." Please note the following items of special interest: ° Rate of Tax - 40 - Section 21-151 ° Discount - 3-°s of the amount due - Section 21-158 ° Exemptions, Section 21-164 FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that a four (40) percent levy on food and beverages could generate revenue over twelve (12) months of $1,200,000 to $1,500,000. ALTERNATIVES 1. Proceed with the required first and second readings of the proposed ordinance on April 26, 1988, and May 10, 1988, and approve and adopt same. 2. Do not proceed with the required first and second read- ings of the proposed ordinance on April 26, 1988, and May 10, 1988; do not adopt the proposed ordinance. S`1'AFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board proceed with Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------- ACT I ON VO`1'E Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers c? -~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES; SUCH NEW ARTICLE VIII IMPOSING A TAX ON CERTAIN FOOD AND BEVERAGES SOLD IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 58.1-3833, CODE OF VIRGINIA (1950), AS AMENDED, AND PROVIDING FOR THE AMOUNT OF SUCH TAX, PROCEDURES FOR COLhECTION, DUTIES OF SELLERS AND DUTIES OF LOCAL OFFICIALS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH TAX, ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, CIVIL PENALTIES FOR LATE PAYMENT, MISDEMEANOR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE, EXEMPTIONS, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, after consideration of this subject and after an opportunity for the citizens of this County to be heard upon this matter at a public hearing held on April 12, 1988, pursuant to Section 58.1-3007, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on April 26, 1988, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on May 10, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, finds that it is appropriate to impose a tax on certain food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Code of Roanoke County, is hereby amended and reenacted by the addition of a new Article VIII, Tax on prepared food and beverages, to read and provide as follows: 1 o-/ ARTICLE VIII. TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES Sec. 21-150. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this arti- cle, shall have, for the purposes of this article, the following respective meanings except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: (a) Caterer: A person who furnishes food on the prem- ises of another, for compensation. (b) Commissioner of the Revenue: The Commissioner of the Revenue of the County of Roanoke, and any of his duly authorized deputies, assistants, employ- ees or agents. (c) Food: Any and all edible refreshments or nourish- ment, liquid or otherwise, including alcoholic beverages, purchased in or from a restaurant or from a caterer, except snack foods. (d) Person: Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership or any group of individuals acting as a unit. (e) Purchaser: Any person who purchases food i.n or from a restaurant or from a caterer. (f) Restaurant: Any place in or from which food is sold in the County, including, but not limited to, any restaurant, dining room, grill, coffee shop, cafeteria, cafe, snack bar, lunch counter, delica- tessen, confectionery, bakery, eating house, eat- ery, drugstore, vending machine, lunch wagon or truck, pushcart or other mobile facility from which food is sold, public or private club, re- sort, bar or lounge. The word "restaurant" shall not mean a grocery store or supermarket except for any space or section therein designated as a deli- catessen or for the sale of prepared sandwiches, delicatessen food or food prepared in a delicates- sen. (g) Seller: Any person who sells food in or from a restaurant or as a caterer. (h) Snack food: Unopened bottles or cans of carbon- ated soft drinks; chewing gum; candy; popcorn; peanuts and other nuts; unopened packages of cook- ies, donuts, crackers and potato chips; and other items of essentially the same nature and consumed for essentially the same purpose. 2 '"1 (i) Treasurer: The Treasurer of the County of Roanoke and any of his duly authorized deputies, assis- tants, employees or agents. Sec. 21-151. Levv of tax; amount. In addition to a]_1 other taxes and fees of any kind now or hereafter imposed by law, a tax is hereby levied and imposed on the purchaser of all food served, sold or delivered in the County in or from a restaurant, whether prepared in such restau- rant or not and whether consumed on the premises or not, or by a caterer. The rate of this tax shall be four (4) percent of the amount paid for such food. In the computation of this tax, any fraction of one-half cent or more shall be treated as one cent. Sec. 21-152. Payment and collection of tax. Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is levied under this article shall collect the amount of tax imposed under this article from the purchaser on whom the same is levied at the time payment for such food becomes due and payable, whe- ther payment is to be made in cash or on credit by means of a credit card or otherwise. The amount of tax owed by the purcha- ser shall be added to the cost of the food by the seller who shall pay the taxes collected to the County as provided in this article. Taxes collected by the seller shall be held in trust by the seller until remitted to the County. Sec. 21-153. Reports and remittances generally. Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is ]_evied under this article shall make out a report, upon such forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and shall sign and deliver such report to the County Treasurer with a remit- tance of such tax. Such reports and remittance sha]_1 be made on or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of tax collected during the preceding month. Sec. 21-154. Preservation of records. It shall be the duty of any seller of food liable for collection and remittance of the taxes imposed by this article L-o keep and preserve for a period of three years records showing gross sales of al_1 food and beverages, the amount charged the purchaser of each such purchase, the date thereof, the taxes col- lected thereon and the amount of tax required to be collected by this article. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall have the power to examine such records at reasonable times and without unreasonable interference with the business of the seller, for the purpose of administering and enforcing the provisions of this article and to make copies of all or any parts thereon. 3 ~"~ Sec. 21-155. _Advertising payment or absorption of tax prohib- ited. No seller shall advertise or hold out to the public in any manner, directly or indirectly, that all or any part of the tax imposed under this article w~l_1 be paid or absorbed by the seller or anyone else, or that the seller or anyone else will relieve the purchaser of the payment of all or any part of the tax. Sec. 21-156. Tips and service charges. Where a purchaser provides a tip for an employee of a seller, and the amount of the tip is wholly in the discretion of the purchaser, the tip is not subject to the tax imposed by this article, whether paid in cash to the employee or added to the bill and charged to the purchaser's account, provided, in the latter case, the full amount of the tip is turned over to the employee by the seller. An amount or percent, whether designated as a tip or a service charge, that is added to the price of the meal by the seller, and required to be paid by the purchaser, is a part of the selling price of the meal and is subject to the tax imposed by this article. Sec. 21-157. Duty of seller when going out of business. Whenever any seller required to collect any pay to the County a tax under this article shall cease to operate or other- wise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall immediately make a report and pay the tax due. Sec. 21-158. Discount. For the purpose of compensating sellers for the collec- tion of the tax imposed by this article, every seller shall be allowed three (3) percent of the amount of the tax due and ac- counted for in the form of a deduction on his monthly return; provided, the amount due is not delinquent at the time of pay- ment. Sec. 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations for the interpretation, administration and en- forcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Com- missioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller _liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who fails, refuses or neglects to collect such tax or to make the reports and remittances required by this article. The Commis- sioner of the Revenue shall have all of the enforcement powers as 4 C/ "~ authorized by Article 1, Chapter 31 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, for purposes of this Article. Sec. 21-160. Procedure upon failure to collect, report, etc. If any seller, whose duty it is to do so shall fail or refuse to collect the tax imposed under this article and to make, within the time provided in this article, the reports and remit- tances mentioned in this article, the Commissioner of the Revenue shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Commissioner of the Revenue shall procure such facts and information as he is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax payable by any seller who has failed or refused to collect such tax and to make such report and remit- tance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such seller the tax and penalties provided for by this article and shall notify such seller, by registered mail sent to hi.s last known place of address, of the tota_1 amount of such tax and penal- ties and the total amount thereof shall be payable within ten (]0) days from the date such notice is sent. Sec. 21-161. Duty of County Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the power and the duty of collecting the taxes imposed and levied hereunder and shall cause the same to be paid into the general treasury for the County. Sec. 21-162. Penalty of late remittance or false return. (a) If any seller whose duty it is to do so shall fai.]_ or refuse to file any report required by this article or to remit to the County Treasurer the tax required to be collected and paid under this article within the time and in the amount specified in this article, there shall be added to such tax by the County Treasurer a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the fail- ure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten (10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional1 thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggre- gate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00). (b) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to defraud the County of any tax due under this article, a penalty of fifty (50) percent of the tax shall be assessed against the person required to collect such tax. Sec. 21-163. Violations of article. Any person violating, failing, refusing or neglecting to comply with any provision of this article shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. Conviction of such violation shall not relieve any person from the payment, collection or remittance of the taxes provided for in this article. Any agreement by any 5 c~ ~- person to pay the taxes provided for in this article by a series of installment payments shall not relieve any person of criminal liability for violation of this article until the full amount of taxes agreed to be paid by such person is received by the Trea- surer. Each failure, refusal, neglect or violation, and each day's continuance thereof, shall constitute a separate offense. Sec. 21-164. Exemptions. The following purchases of food shall not be subject to the tax under this article: (a) Food furnished by restaurants to employees as part of their compensation when no charge is made to the employee. (b) Food sold by non-profit day care centers, public or private elementary or secondary schools or food sold by any college or university to its students or employees. (c) Food for use or consumption by the Commonwealth, any political subdivision of the Commonwealth or the United States. (d) Food furnished by a hospital, medical clinic, con- valescent home, nursing home, home for the aged, infirm or handicapped or other extended care facil- ity to patients or residents thereof. (e) Food Furnished by a non-profit charitable organiza- tion to elderly, infirm, handicapped or needy per- sons in their homes or at central locations. (f) Food sold by a non-profit educational, charitable or benevolent organization on an occasional basis as a fund-raising activity or food sold by a church or religious body on an occasional basis. (g) Any other sale of food which is exempt from taxa- tion under the Virginia Retail Sales and Use Tax Act, or administrative rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1988. 6 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of timber rights on approximately sixty-one acres of real property located near Virginia State Route 603 in Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 23, 1986, Roanoke County entered into an agree- ment with Mary Ann Wohlford Marchant and John D. Marchant for the purchase of approximately sixty-one acres of real property desig- nated as Roanoke County Tax Map Number 82.00-1-1. Included in the agreement was a provision that the sellers reserved the right to harvest timber on the property for two years from the date of the agreement. This property was purchased for $36,600, and is part of the Spring Hollow Reservoir project. The Marchants sold the timber rights to Turman Sawmill, Inc., on December 31, 1986. Turman Sawmill plans to harvest the sixty-one acres. The harvesting of this timber will cause exces- sive erosion of the property and will eliminate the protection provided to the reservoir drainage area. Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County requires that the acquisition and acceptance of real property be accomplished by ordinance. On April 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors approved the first reading of the Ordinance to enter into an agreement with Turman Sawmill, Inc., to acquire the timber rights and also to enter into an agreement with the Marchants granting their consent to the assignment of the timber rights by Turman Sawmill, Inc., to Roanoke County. The second reading is sched- uled f_or April 26, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: ALTERNATIVE N0. 1: Enter into an agreement with Turman Sawmill, Inc., to acquire the timber rights for this tract and also enter into an agreement with the Marchants granting their consent to the assignment of the timber rights by Turman Sawmill, Inc., to Roanoke County. This will prevent the harvesting of the timber and protect the reservoir drainage area. The fiscal impact of this alternative is $15,000. Funds are available in the Spring Hollow Reservoir account. ALTERNATIVE N0. 2: ;~~ ~_ ~ Do not enter into an agreement with 'Turman Sawmill, Inc., to acquire the timber rights for this tract. The harvesting of the timber will pose an adverse environmental impact to the reservoir project. There will be unknown damages caused by erosion and a considerable cost for reforesting the tract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends the approval of Alternative No. 1 as follows: (1) That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance to acquire the timber rights from Turman Sawmill for $15,000; (2) That the Board of Supervisors enter into an agreement with Mary Ann Wohlford Marchant and John D. Marchant granting -their consent to the assignment of the timber rights by Turman Sawmill, Inc., to Roanoke County; (3) That the County Administrator be authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of the timber rights, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. SUBMITTED BY: G~~ C~ ohn R. Hubbard, P.E. Assistant County Administrator Community Services & Development Approved Denied Received Referred to APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Ad ministrator ANION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 r ~AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~-~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 ORllINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBER RIGHTS ON APPROXIMATELY SIXTY-ONE (61) ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR VIRGINIA STATE ROUTE 603 IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concern- ing the acquisition and acceptance of the hereinafter-described timber rights was held on April 12, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on April 26, 1988; and WHEREAS, on December 23, 1986, Roanoke County purchased approximately sixty-one (61) acres of real property from Mary Ann Wohlford Merchant and John D. Merchant, said tract being more particularly described as located near Virginia State Route 603 in Roanoke County and designated as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1; and WHEREAS, in the deed of purchase between the Merchants and Roanoke County the Merchants reserved the right to harvest timber on said sixty-one (61) acres for two years from the date of the deed; and WHEREAS, the Merchants sold their retained timber rights to Turman Sawmill Inc. on December 31, 1986; and WIiEREAS, the Merchants have agreed to enter into an agreement with Roanoke County releasing all their right, title, and interest to harvest timber on the above-described property; and .. _ -/ WHEREAS, Turman Sawmill Inc. plans to harvest the sixty- one (61) acres which will have an adverse environmental impact on the development of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the agreement between Mary Ann Wohlford Marchant and John D. Marchant and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, releasing all the Marchant's right, title, and interest to harvest timber on the approximately sixty- one (61) acres off of Virginia State Route 603, more particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1, be, and hereby is, accepted. 2. That the conveyance of the timber rights located on approximately sixty-one (61) acres off of Virginia State Route 603 more particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1 from Turman Sawmill Inc. to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, accepted. 3. That the purchase price of the timber rights is Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000), said funds being available in the Spring Hollow Reservoir account. 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such document and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition and accep- tance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 1988 ORDINANCE 42688-10 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBER RIGHTS ON APPROXIMATELY SIXTY-ONE (61) ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR VIRGINIA STATE ROUTE 603 IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concern- ing the acquisition and acceptance of the hereinafter-described timber rights was held on April 12, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on April 26, 1988; and WHEREAS, on December 23, 1986, Roanoke County purchased approximately sixty-one (61) acres of real property from Mary Ann Wohlford Marchant and John D. Marchant, said tract being more particularly described as located near Virginia State Route 603 in Roanoke County and designated as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1; and WHEREAS, in the deed of purchase between the Marchants and Roanoke County the Marchants reserved the right to harvest timber on said sixty-one (61) acres for two years from the date of the deed; and WHEREAS, the Marchants sold their retained timber rights to Turman Sawmill Inc. on December 31, 1986; and WHEREAS, the Marchants have agreed to enter into an agreement with Roanoke County releasing all their right, title, and interest to harvest timber on the above-described property; and WHEREAS, Turman Sawmill Inc. plans to harvest the sixty- one (61) acres which will have an adverse environmental impact on the development of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the agreement between Mary Ann Wohlford Marchant and John D. Marchant and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, releasing all the Marchant's right, title, and interest to harvest timber on the approximately sixty- one (61) acres off of Virginia State Route 603, more particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1, be, and hereby is, accepted. 2. That the conveyance of the timber rights located on approximately sixty-one (61) acres off of Virginia State Route 603 more particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 82.00-1-1 from Turman Sawmill Inc. to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, accepted. 3. That the purchase price of the timber rights is Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000), said funds being available in the Spring Hollow Reservoir account. 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such document and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition and accep- tance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: `ter>~-~-, .1d Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4/28/88 cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Adm. of Com. Services & Dev Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance 3 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 26, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Roger D. Hale and Mike Montgomery requesting A Use Not Provided for Permit and rezoning from R-3 Residential to B-2 Business of a tract containing 0.23 acre and located at 4355 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to operate a dog grooming business. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered -- conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703J 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 7th day of April, 1988. ~~~, ~ .~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, April 12, 1988 Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Roger Hale & Mike Montgomery 4355 Franklin Road S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 (703-989-6956) L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 26, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell requesting a Use Not Provided for Permit on a tract containing 3.079 acres and located immediately east of the terminus of State Route 667 in the Vinton Magisterial District. The Permit has been requested to operate a dog boarding kennel and to hold obedier:ce training classes. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703J 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 7th day of April, 1988. Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, April 12, 1988 Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Richard and Tamara Carrell 5272 Old Virginia Springs Road Roanoke, VA 24014 (703-342-3915) L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to a1T interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7.:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 26,.1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Clarence David Shepherd requesting rezoning from from B-2 Business to B-3 Business and a Special Exception Permit of a tract containing 6,470 square feet and located at 6718 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to operate a used car sales business. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 7th day of April, 1988. /`~' - Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, April 12, 1988 Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Clarence David Shepherd 115 Stratford Drive Blue Ridge, VA 24064 (703-977-8558) L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 26, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Clifford Curry requesting a Special Exception Permit and an amendment. of conditions on a tract containing 5.57 acres and located on the east side of VA Route 706 approximately 0.1 miles south of its intersection with Route 419 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a retirement facility. The County Planning Commission recommends approval. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this Seventh day of April, 1988. Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, April 12, 1988 Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Clifford Curry 471 High Street S.E. Salem, Oregon 97301 503-399-1090 LDGAL NOTICE OF A RDGUTAR MEETING OF TEiE RQANOKE ~TN'I'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, ,April 26, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue: SW, in Roanoke, Virginia to hear the following requests: 1. Petition of the Secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Ca~mission to amend the designation of a 0.678 acre tract located at 6024 Williamson Road on the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. All plans ,and ordinances are available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, Roan 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. Given under my hand this 6th day of April, 1988. ~') C~'~~ Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish: Evening Edition Roanoke Times & World-News April 12, 1988 April 19, 1988 Please bill: County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons OSTEPHGUOT, FERGUSGN N ATT, AHERON S AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RGANOKE, VIRGINIA 24019-1699 that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on April 26, 1988, on the petition of M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS to rezone with certain conditions a 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 6.01, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-1-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and• recorded as part of Parcel No.38.16-I-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018 if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 7~ day of Q~~ , ~STERHOUOT, FERGUSGN NATT, AI,£RON 6 AGEE ATTGRNEYS-A7-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGItJIA 24018-1699 19 8 $' . u i^ y ~f . ~ /7~~ , ~epcc fy C l e r k ----- Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ----------------------------------------------------------- Please publish in the evening edition of The Roanoke Times- World News on Tuesday, April 12, 1988, and Tuesday, Aprit 19, 1988. Please bill cost of the publication to Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C., 1919 Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018. r2.e5h.c 2 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on April 26, 1988, on the petition of ERNEST CLARK to rezone with certain conditions a 9.77 acre parcel of land, generally located on the South Side of Wood Haven Road west of 1-581, within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 in the Roanoke County Tax Records, pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: A 9.77 acre parcel of land, generally located on the South Side of Wood Haven Road west of 1-581, within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel No. 37.05-1-1 and Parcel No. 37.05-1-2 in the Roanoke County Tax Records A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center, OSTERHOUOT, FERGIISON 3738 Bramb I eton Avenue Roanoke Vi r i n i a . MATT, AHERON G AGEE ~ r g ATTORNEYS-AT-IAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018 if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 1'~j day of /q I''%~ I ss~_. n'kZ~ y ~i len, ~epc~f- --C I e r k----------- Board of Supervisors ofd Roanoke County Please publish in the evening edition of T_he Roanoke Times- World News on Tuesday, April 12, 1988, and Tuesday, April 19, 1988. Please bill cost of the publication to Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron E Agee, P.C., 1919 Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018. r2.e6d.c OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN MATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24019-1699 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on April 26, 1988, on the petition of HOP-IN FOOD STORES, INC. to rezone with certain conditions A 2.85 acre parcel of land, generally located at the northeasterly intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #26.20-4-27 in the Roanoke County Tax Records, pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: A 2.85 acre parcel of land, generally located at the northeasterly intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #26.20-4-27 in the Roanoke County Tax Records A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the .petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, QSTERHOUOT, FERGSISCIN I oca ted i n Room 600 a t Roanoke County Administrative Center, NATT, AHEROiI & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. R~AN~KE, YIRGRIIA 24018-1699 Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018 if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand th i s 7~ day o f /~p~^i ~___, 1988 c_~c_-e--c~- 7Yjc~ ~y it ~ y/en, ~~ C l e r k Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County QSTERHOUOT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON 6 AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 ----------------------------------------------------------- Please publish in the evening edition of T_he Roanoke Times- World News on Tuesday, April 12, 1988, and Tuesday April 19, 1988 Please bill cost of the publication to Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C., 1919 Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018. r2.e4e.c L A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~'~'~ ~ _ ~ ~, 1c, .~- PUBLIC HEARING ON /~ ~t ,1 ~ ~'v~ ~~ --`°~ ~~~ ,~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: Lie. ~ r~ ~'C© ~c--~n pert ADDRESS : "~ r~-'~' ~ "'i _~~~.o~,c ~ ~ ~ .. ~ C. *a PHONE: ~c''n~.na:~ery lr~ 2 ~~f`~ ~']'r' _ ~~ ~ ~` PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.)