HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/10/1988 - Regular
~~ aoaNO,~~
~~
ov ~ a ~~~K~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~
150
18 .~.~ 88
ROANOKE CO UNTY BO ARD OF SUPERVISORS
SESQU-CENTENN~P
n -3~~~~r~/u-~3eg~~~~~r„g ACTION AGENDA
MAY 10, 1988
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 3:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced.
AS PART OF THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY ACTIVITIES, THERE WILL BE A MOCK
BOARD MEETING AT 1:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM. BOARD MEMBERS HAVE
BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THESE ACTIVITIES.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY LEADERS WERE INTRODUCED.
1. Presentation of U. S. Flag flown over U. S. Capital.
PRESENTED TO LG FROM FRED ANDERSON
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Letter of Understanding on Valleypointe
Project.
A-51088-1 - BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE AFTER ELIMINATION OF PARAGRAPH 5 AND
CORRECTION ON ADDENDUM
SAM - ABSTAIN
AYES - BLJ, RR, HCN, LG
ECH WILL PLAN GROUNDBREAKING ON JUNE 24th
2. Approval to allocate Roanoke County's contribution for
the VML/VACO Steering Committee rate negotiations with
Appalachian Power.
A-51088-2 - HCN/SAM TO APPROVE ALTERNATE #1
URC
3. Authorization to accept a Grant from the Va. Department
of Emergency Service for Regional Hazardous Material
response.
A-51088-3 - BLJ/RR TO APPROVE
URC
4. Approval to proceed with public hearings and ordinance
amending premium refuse collection service.
A-51088-4 - HCN/SAM TO APPROVE
URC
5. Approval of cooperative ventures proposed by the
Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee.
A-51088-5 - LG/HCN TO APPROVE
URC
6. Authorization to proceed with a Wellness Program for
Roanoke County
A-51088-6 - HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE #1
URC
7. Approval of Classification Plan for Fiscal Year
1988/89.
A-51088-7 - HCN/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMI~NDATION
AYES - RR,SAM,HCN,LG
NAYS - BLJ
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
LG ANNOUNCED WORK SESSION ON MAY 24TH AT 3 P.M. WITH CORPS OF
ENGINEERS ON ROANOKE RIVER TRIBUTARIES
WORK SESSION ON JUNE 14TH ON LANDFILL AND WASTE TO ENERGEY POTENTIALS.
AND POSSIBILITY OF INCREASING OF LANDFILL FEES
F'. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
2
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8,
Adoption of state law of Article I of Chapter 12,
Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County
Code.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC
2ND READING - 5/24/88
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and
Protection, of the Roanoke County Code by
repealing Section 9-2, "Possession, Sale,
Discharge, etc. of Fireworks," the repeal of
Article II, "Fire Lanes," and the repeal of
Article III, Fire Protection Code,"; and by the
enactment of a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code," to provide for the
establishment of certain permit and inspection
fees, and to authorize the enforcement of same.
HCN/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC
2ND READING - 5/24/88
3. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2988-6
authorizing the lease of approximately five (5)
acres in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area by the
County of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for
recreational purposes.
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC
2ND READING - 5/24/88
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of
the Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition
of a new Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and
Beverages_ such new article VIII imposing a tax on
certain food and beverages sold in the County of
Roanoke, pursuant to Section 58-1-3833, Code of
Virginia {1950), as amended, and providing for the
amount of such tax, procedures for collection,
duties of sellers and duties of local officials
with respect to such tax, enforcement procedures,
civil penalties for late payment, misdemeanor
penalties for violations of article, exemptions,
and an effective date.
0-51088-8 - HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD
URC
I , APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
LG NOMINATED JON WALP
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
PMM UPDATED BOARD OF STATUS OF COUNCIL/BOARD WILL BRING BACK
REPORT IN JUNE
3, Fifth Planning District Commission
q, Industrial Development Authority
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
BLJ NOMINATED JAMES BRYANT TO ANOTHER 3-YEAR TERM
SAM NOMINATED YVONNE WILLIS AND KENNETH BOWEN TO ANOTHER 3-YEAR
TERM
J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
JOHNSON REQUESTED THAT LG, RR, AND APPROPRIATE STAFF STUDY THE
RESULTS OF PRIVITIZATION IN PHOENIX, ARIZONA BEFORE PROCEEDING
WITH FURTHER EFFORTS IN ROANOKE COUNTY. LG WILL WRITE TO PHOENIX
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
MCGRAW REQUESTED BOARD SUPPORT FOR: (1) INVESTIGATE SUPPORT FOR
DOUBLING THE TIPPING FEE, (2) ASK FOR DELEGATE CRANWELL'S HELP
WITH GENERAL ASM ACTION ON WASTE-TO-ENERGEY EFFORTS, (3) ASK
LANDFILL BOARD TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE WASTE-TO-ENERGY
WORK SESSION SET FOR JUNE 14 - LG REQUESTED DELAY OF VOTE FOR
SUPPORT TO 5/24
NICECENS ADVISED THAT $56,0000 IS SPENT FOR PRIVATE VENDOR FOR
TRASH PICKUP. ASKED STAFF TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBILITY OF COUNTY
HANDLING SCHOOL TRASH PICKUP. ALSO REQUESTED A REPORT ON
COMMERCIAL TRASH PICKUP.
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
4
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
R-51088-9
HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE - URC
1. Minutes of Meetings - February 9, 1988, February
23, 1988
2. Request for acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle into the VDOT Secondary System.
R-51088-9.a
3. Request for acceptance of Haven's Trail into the
VDOT Secondary System.
R-51088-9.b
4. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Fifth Planning District Commission, the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission, Industrial
Development Authority and Total Action Against
Poverty Board of Directors.
A-51088-9.c
5. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
R-51088-9.d
6. Resolution of approval from the Planning
Commission for proposed park development in the
Hollins Project area.
A-51088-9.e
7. Authorization to enter into an agreement for use
and maintenance of private road.
A-51088-9.f
8. Acknowledgment from VDOT of the acceptance of 0.06
miles of Old Manor Drive and 0.11 miles of Old
Manor Court 0.13 miles of Branderwood Drive, 0.11
miles of Whipplewood Drive, 0.45 miles of
Summerset Drive and 0.07 miles of Summerset Circle
into VDOT Secondary System.
A-51088-9.a
I,, REPORTS
HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE
URC
1. General Operating Fund income analysis and
Statement of Expenditures for month ended March
31, 1988.
5
2. Unappropriated balance in Capital Fund
3. Unappropriated balance in General Fund
4. Unappropriated balance in Board Contingency Fund
M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. DONNA WOOD, 3876 PITZER ROAD PRESENTED PETITION OPPOSING
LANDFILL SITE AT MOUNT PLEASANT.
2. LYNEE BRANDI, 1902 QUEENSMILL DR., SALEM, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF
ADEQUATE FUNDING OF SCHOOLS, AND CONTINUED STUDY OF CONSOLIDATION
OF SERVICES.
3. DOUG CHITTUM, 3403 PITZER RD. SPOKE IN OPPOSITION OF LANDFILL
SITE AT MOUNT PLEASANT
AT. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) to consider a real estate
matter
LG AT 5:15
Q. ADJOURNMENT
6
o~~ROANp~,~
~ ,~
~~ aZ ~ ~~~.~~~.~
i$ f5~ $$ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul8eginning AGENDA
MAY 10, 1988
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 3:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced.
AS PART OF THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY ACTIVITIES, THERE WILL BE A MOCK
BOARD MEETING AT 1:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM. BOARD MEMBERS HAVE
BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THESE ACTIVITIES.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation:
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Presentation of U. S. Flag flown over U. S. Capital.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Letter of Understanding on Valleypointe
Project.
2. Approval to allocate Roanoke County's contribution for
the VML/VACO Steering Committee rate negotiations with
Appalachian Power.
3. Authorization to accept a Grant from the Va. Department
of Emergency Service for Regional Hazardous Material
response.
4. Approval to proceed with public hearings and ordinance
amending premium refuse collection service.
5. Approval of cooperative ventures proposed by the
Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee.
6. Authorization to proceed with a Wellness Program for
Roanoke County
7. Approval of Classification Plan for Fiscal Year
1988/89.
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8,
Adoption of state law of Article I of Chapter 12,
Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County
Code.
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and
Protection," of the Roanoke County Code by
repealing Section 9-2, "Possession, Sale,
Discharge, etc. of Fireworks," the repeal of
Article II, "Fire Lanes," and the repeal of
Article III, "Fire Protection Code,"; and by the
enactment of a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code," to provide for the
establishment of certain permit and inspection
fees, and to authorize the enforcement of same.
3. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2988-6
authorizing the lease of approximately five (5)
acres in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area by the
County of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for
recreational purposes.
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
2
1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of
the Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition
of a new Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and
Beverac~es_ such new article VIII imposing a tax on
certain food and beverages sold in the County of
Roanoke, pursuant to Section 58-1-3833, Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended, and providing for the
amount of such tax, procedures for collection,
duties of sellers and duties of local officials
with respect to such tax, enforcement procedures,
civil penalties for late payment, misdemeanor
penalties for violations of article, exemptions,
and an effective date.
I. APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
3. Fifth Planning District Commission
4. Industrial Development Authority
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Minutes of Meetings - February 9, 1988, February
23, 1988
2. Request for acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle into the VDOT Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Haven's Trail into the
VDOT Secondary System.
4. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Fifth Planning District Commission, the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission, Industrial
3
5. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
6. Resolution of approval from the Planning
Commission for proposed park development in the
Hollins Project area.
7. Authorization to enter into an agreement for use
and maintenance of private road.
8. Acknowledgment from VDOT of the acceptance of 0.06
miles of Old Manor Drive and 0.11 miles of Old
Manor Court, 0.13 miles of Branderwood Drive, 0.11
miles of Whipplewood Drive, 0.45 miles of
Summerset Drive and 0.07 miles of Summerset Circle
into VDOT Secondary System.
L. REPORTS
1. General Operating Fund
Statement of Expenditu
31, 1988.
2. Unappropriated balance
3. Unappropriated balance
4. Unappropriated balance
inc
ces
in
in
in
:ome analysis and
for month ended March
Capital Fund
General Fund
Board Contingency Fund
M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) to consider a real estate
matter.
p. ADJOURNMENT
4
ACTION N0.
v
ITEM NUMBER ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of U. S. Flag from Senator Trible's
Office.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Senator Paul Trible has made arrangement to have the United
States flag that flew over the U. S. Capital on March 30, 1988,
given to Roanoke County in honor of the Sesquicentennial
birthday.
A member of Senator Trible's staff will be present to donate the
flag to Chairman Lee Garrett and County Treasurer Alfred Anderson.
It has been requested that the flag be appropriately hung through
1988 and then be included in the Sesquicentennial time capsule.
Elmer C. dge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
ACTION #
A-51088-1
ITEM NUMBER ~ "'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Valleypointe - project letter and schedule
COUNTY AD NISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : /'2~1V ~'' 4
J
BACKGROUND
The Board of Supervisors approved the acceptance of VDOT indus-
trial access funds in the amount of $450,000 at the April 26,
1988 meeting. A design-build concept was authorized to be
initiated to construct the Valleypointe access road.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Roanoke County and Lingerfelt Development Inc. have previously
executed a project document dated December 1, 1987 that should be
revised and updated. Lingerfelt is proceeding to close the
purchase of a portion of the Harris-Moomaw tract by May 30, 1988
and obtain a building permit for his first tenant. Roanoke
County has purchased 8 acres from the Ida Mae Holland estate and
is proceeding to exchange this with the Regional Airport Commis-
sion for equivalent acreage in the extended Airport Clear Zone.
Completion of the design of the access road will enable the
County to begin the review and approval with VDOT and Roanoke
City and seek bids in June. Exhibit III of the attached letter
of understanding sets forth the project schedule.
The project letter sets forth financial commitments and project
responsibilities determined at meetings between Roanoke County
and Lingerfelt Development, Inc.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Proceed with endorsement of the letter of understanding and amend-
ments for stormwater management and project site density (Exhibit
V).
--° !
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
~^
t/~
Timo by W. Gu ala
Director, Economic Development
~~~~!,r....-~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abstain
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. x
Denied ( ) Nickens to approve after elimination Garrett _~
Received ( ) of Paragraph 5 and correction on Johnson _~
Referred addendum McGraw ~
To Nickens _~
Robers
cc: File
Tim Gubala
John Hubbard
Phil Henry
OF ROANp~~
a A
. .
Z
o - ~z
18 8 150 ~ 88
sFSQt11CENTENN~P~'
A Beautiful Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ADDENDUM to letter of understanding dated April 26, 1988
Pertaining to A.2 on the first page:
The County will seek bids or proposals for the design and
construction of the Phase I Road (a four lane road with roadside
ditches, built to VDOT standards to the industrial access site
and the associated intersection improvements to Kenworth and
Thirlane Roads and signalization) utilizing plans and specifica-
tions prepared by the developer's engineer, to serve the proposed
Valleypointe project. Such bids will be advertised in June 1988
and opened on June 21, 1987. Cons ~ u~ on ~~~ he road should
be in on June 27, 1988.
County Administrator
~D -/
(~uunfy of ~Rnttnn~r
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
OF POANp~.F
~ ~ ~
~ jp
Z
2
~ ~ a
~,
18 fSO~ 88
SFgQU1CEN7ENN~P~'
A Beauti~uBtginnin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. Alan T. Lingerfelt
Lingerfelt Development Corporation
12 South Third Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear A1:
~-/
C~uixnf,~ of ~~ttnnl~e
April 26, 1988
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Subject: Valleypointe Project
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS, VICE•CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Q08 L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL OIST RICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
This letter is to confirm our intent to proceed with the
County"s participation in the referenced project as authorized in
the Project Document approved by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on December 1, 1987. We intend to proceed as follows:
A. Phase I Road.
1. The County will enter into an agreement with VDOT,
authorizing the County to administer the design and
construction of the industrial access road to serve
the proposed Valleypointe Phase I project as shown on
Exhibit I hereto (the "Phase I Road").
2. The iounty will seek bids or proposals for the design
and construction of the Phase I Road (a four lane
road with roadside ditches, built to VDOT standards
to the industrial access site and the associated
intersection improvements to Kenworth and Thirlane
Roads and signalization) to serve the proposed
Valleypointe Phase I project on or before May 2,
1988.
3. The County shall complete the acquisition of
approximately 8 acres of real estate from the Roanoke
Regional Airport Commission for the Phase I Road by
May 15, 1988.
4. In consideration for the design and construction of
these road improvements the County shall negotiate a
payment schedule and terms with t11e contractor
substantially as follows:
~ --
Mr. Alan Lingerfelt
April 26, 1988
Page 2
a. The County, at its option, may transfer to the
contractor as partial payment on the construction
contract legal title to any of the real estate
acquired from the Airport commission which is not
used as part of the dedicated right=of-way for the
Phase I Road. In such event, the amount of such
partial payment shall be equal to the number of
acres so transferred multiplied by the per acre
price paid by the County.
b. Payment to contractor of $520,000, upon approval by
VDOT of design and construction plans and
authorization to proceed from VDOT, but not earlier
than July 5, 1988; and
c. Payment of the balance of contract amount due to
contractor upon completion of work and acceptance
of work by VDOT. (If this amount exceeds the
$450,000 allocated through industrial access and
matching funds, you will be responsible for the
balance. In the event a proposal is considered
which would require this payment to exceed $450,000
we will require your commitment at that time or the
scope of the work will have to be reduced.)
5, Any part of the Phase I Road dedicated right-of-way
which is not required when the final road desig n
and contract are approved will be vacated at the
request of the adjacent property owners in
accordance with the County Code.
B. Phase II Road.
The County will place the construction and upgrading of
a road to service the Phase II property from Peters
Creek Road to the northern property line of Phase II in
the six-year secondary highway plan as a high priority
item. To the extent that secondary road funds are
available, the County will construct this road within
18 months of your notice to the County of your
obligation to close on fifteen (15) or more acres of
Phase II property. The County may supplement secondary
road funds with any funds that may be left in the $2
million allocation or with any other State funds that
the road may be eligible for. In no event will the
County be required to provide this road prior to April
1, 1991.
-,~,. r
.,., r
Mr. Alan Lingerfelt
April 26, 1988
Page 3
C. Utilities.
1. The County will proceed with the construction of
off-site utilities to provide adequate water and sewer
to the Phase I property with a taxget completion date
of August 17, 1988. When such water and sewer have
been completed and are operable, you will begin paying.
minimum monthly water and sewer service rates of $500
per month for each utility until such time as the first
building in Valleypointe is connected to such services.
You will be responsible for installing the sewer from
the I-581 right-of-way to and within your development.
We will install the water through the development to
the northern end of the extension of the Phase I Road
to its intersection with Woodhaven Road and to the
southern end of the Phase I Road at Peters Creek Road.
2. The County will construct adequate water and
sewer service to service the first section developed in
Phase II within 270 days of notice of obligation to
close on 15 or more acres of the Phase II property. In
any event, the Phase II utilities will not be required
prior to April 1, 1990.
3. The County will obtain all required permits and
easements except for easements through what is known at
the Phase I and Phase II property which you will obtain.
These utilities will be constructed to the extent that
funds are available within the $2 million allocated to
the project of which $1 million is currently allocated
for off-site utilities. In the event these funds are
insufficient, you will be eligible for off-site credits
for utilities you construct in accordance with the
County Code. All buildings in the Valleypointe Project
will be subject to the County's standard water and
sewer connection fees and rates for the specified use.
No special assessments will be charged against the
developer or the users by the County.
D. Use of Escrowed Funds.
The County has determined to reserve or escrow $300,000
of the $2,000,000 allocated for the development of
Valleypointe for repayment to the State of Virginia
in the event qualified users are not obtained for Phase
I of Valleypointe as required by the Hiohway and
Transportation Board in connection with the allocation
of industrial access funds for the Phase I Road. The
Mr. Alan Lingerfelt
April 26, 1988
Page 4
County agrees that any of sucYi escrowed funds not used
for such repayment shall be made available as qualified
users are approved to reimburse you for your costs and
expenses incurred for roads and utilities (whether on
or off site) and storm water drainage and detention,
including any architectural and engineering fees and
expenses in connection therewith, with respect to
Phase I of Valleypointe to the extent permitted under
the Public Procurement Act and otherwise will be made
available for the construction of public improvements
for Phase I and Phase II of Valleypointe.
E. Amendment to Project. Document.
The County Administrator will request the Board of
Supervisors at the May 10, 1988 meeting to amend the
project document approved at the December 1, 1987
meeting as follows:
1. limit the four acre parcel size restriction to 50$
of the Valleypointe project;
2. reword the storm water management clause to
duplicate the condition on storm water management
in the zoning documents;
3. authorization for the County Administrator to
proceed in accordance with the terms of this
letter.
This letter in no way changes the obligation previously made
by the County to provide $2 million in funding and to pursue
State sources of funding. This letter in no way obligates you or
the County to Phase II development unless it is economically
feasible as previously agreed upon. This letter does however,
confirm your intent to finalize development plans for Phase II as
soon as possible in order that we may proceed with Phase II
utilities at an earlier date if we so desire.
Project management will be accomplished by coordination
between your representatives through Tom Medley and County staff
through Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development.
Mr. Alan Lingerfelt
April 26, 1988
Page S
Attached are the following exhibits for clarification:
I. Identification of Valleypointe Phase I property, Phase
Phase II. property and proposed first section of Phase
II, and Phase I Road.
II. Identification of Phase II Road.
III. Proposed schedule.
IV. Anticipated breakdown of funding.
Please contact me if you should have any questions.
Sincere ,
tir.~,.i
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
TWGubala/sbo
pc Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
County Attorney Paul Mahoney
Scott Hodge, Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Bill Gieg, McGuire, Woods, Battle and Booth
Tom Medley, Innsbrook Management Company
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Enclosure
.,.d. ~
AMENDED 5/5/88
EXHIBIT III
It is the intent of the County that the following target
dates be accomplished:
May 10, 1988 Agreement between County and VDOT author-
izing County to administer design and
construction of industrial access road
improvement.
May 24, 1988 Bids or request for proposals requested
by County for construction of industrial
access road improvements.
May 30, 1988 Acquisition of all ROW for Phase I Road
and utility easements.
June 20, 1988 Approval of design and construction plans
by VDOT, authorization to proceed with
construction.
June 21, 1988 Award of design and construction contract
for Phase I Road.
June 27, 1988 Begin construction of Phase I Road.
August 17, 1988 Completion of Phase I off-site utilities.
October 14, 1988 Completion of construction of Phase I
Road.
~ - ~ ~~~
ANTICIPATED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
FAA VDOT COUNTY TOTAL
Reimbursement for Airport
property $88,000 ( 88,000)
ROW a~uisition 260,000 260,000
Industrial access road $450,000 520,000 970,000
Off-site utilities
Phase I 350,000 350,000
Off-site utilities
Phase II 650,000 650,000
Escrow funds (to be
released upon
qualifying use) 300,000 300,000
Other public improvements_ 8,000 8,000
$88,000 $450,000 $2,000,000 $2,538,000
*Note: These funds have already been disbursed for the Ida Mae
Holland tract and the exchange for the ROW is in process..
`"
EXHIBIT V
Amendments to project document dated December 1, 1987
a. Review of drainage situation for Valleypointe to implement a
design for drainage facilities to either detain or retain a ten
(10) year storm released at the two (2) year rate.
b. Restrict the subdivision of Valleypointe such that no more
than 50~ of Phase I will be subdivided into lots of less than
four (4) acres.
ACTION # A-51088-2
ITEM NUMBER ~ -'Z'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM:
Contribution to VACO for Rate Negotiations with
Appalachian Power Company
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS•
~~~
~~
BACKGROUND:
The VML/VACO Steering Committee was formed for the purpose
of negotiating electrical rates with Appalachian Power Company
for electrical service to the political subdivisions in the
Appalachian service area. VML/VACO has asked for a contribution
from all localities to finance these negotiations.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
VACO has asked that we again consider making a voluntary
contribution of $7,072 towards the expenses of the Steering
Committee. The VML/VACO Steering Committee has successfully
completed its negotiations with Appalachian Power Company.
Overall general service, school and pumping rates to all
jurisdictions are to be decreased by approximately 10 percent for
the last six months of 1987 and approximately 15 percent
beginning January 1, 1988. These decreases will be retroactive.
Savings to the County are estimated as follows:
1987-88 1988-89
Schools $175,000 $175,000
Utility 36,000 36,000
County 26,000 26,000
$237.000 $237,000
The Schools have already been notified of these savings and
have used them in their 1988-89 budget preparation. The County
would like to use their portion of the savings to upgrade the
street lighting from mercury vapor to high pressure sodium.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. The County could contribute $7,072 to the VML/VACO
Steering Committee. The cost could be charged to the
ACTION # A-51088-3
ITEM NUMBER ~ '-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Roanoke County Agreement on Level III Regional
Response Team with Department of Emergency Ser-
vices
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Hazardous Materials Emergency Responses Pro-
gram, Chapter 3.5 of Title 44 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, was enacted in 1987 in order to coordinate hazardous
materials training emergency response programs between the state
and local political subdivisions. This program is a response to
federal mandates in "the Emergency Planning and Community Right
to Know Act of 1986: contained in Title ITI of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"). The Roanoke
County Fire and Rescue Department is directly involved in this
program by providing immediate response capability at the Level
III for emergency hazardous materials accidents.
This agreement on Level III Regional Response Team will per-
mit the establishment of a Regional Hazardous Materials Incident
Response Team to support the Virginia Hazardous Materials Emer-
gency Response Program. The Department of Emergency Services
(DES) will provide to the County for the Fire and Rescue Depart-
ment not less than $42,5000 during the current fiscal year and a
total of approximately $95,000 over three years for equipment
required to maintain the minimum equipment list established by
DES. DES will conduct Level III training for twenty-five (25)
County personnel at no cost to the County. The agreement sets
forth a procedure and reimbursement rates for County personnel
and equipment involved in a Level III response. Further, llES
will cover the costs of yearly medical monitoring and exposure
examinations of hazardous materials team members as well as
worker's compensation and liability protection coverage including
legal representation.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
.~~ -
Funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of
Emergency Services, not less than $42,500 during current fiscal
year, and $95,000 over three years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize the County Admin-
istrator to execute this agreement on Level III Regional Response
Team on behalf of the County and for the Treasurer to accept any
grant from the Department of Emergency Services and to pay out
such funds received for the purchase of equipment by the Fire and
Rescue Departments in accordance with the minimum equipment list
specified by DES .
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/
Richard W. Robers to approve
cc: File
Paul Mahoney
Diane Hyatt
Reta Busher
Tommy Fuqua
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
ACTION # A-51088-4
ITEM NUMBER ~ - `T
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS`PRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10,.1988
AGENDA ITEM: Amendment to Premium Refuse Collection Service
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: ~~,~~~~ A.~/~ ~~
BACKGROUND:
Citizen concern has been raised over the fact that when
performing premium service, the refuse collectors will only take
the household garbage. Further, in review of our current
procedures, elderly and handicapped residents also receive
backdoor service for household garbage only. The resolutions
defining Curbside Service, 85-147 and Premium Service, 85-183
were passed by the Board, September 3, 1985 and October 22, 1985,
respectively. These resolutions established the procedures and
charges for premium service, established backyard "Collection for
Disabled", and established the policy that residents who qualify
for these two services "... must make their own arrangements to
have any materials that are not part of their regular household
refuse placed at the curb for collection." This proposed redefi-
nition will increase service to 351 residents who fall in these
two categories.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Item 1 - Redefinition of Premium Service:
Premium service will include trash that is not part of the
normal household garbage. This would include grass, leaves, and
any other materials that can be containerized and weigh 50 lbs.
or less. These materials will be collected with the normal
household garbage. Bulk items that cannot be containerized
(white goods, sofas, etc.) will continue to be collected at the
curb under the published monthly schedule.
Item 1.A - Cost of Redefined Premium Service:
Premium service presently costs the citizen $1.25 per
collection or $5.00 per month for those residents within 100 ft.
of the curb and an additional $4.00 charge for each additional
100 ft. or fraction thereof over the initial 100 ft. Cost of the
redefined service is increased by $.75 per collection for a total
of $8.00 per month and $5.00 per additional 100 ft.
~-y
Item 1.B - Redefined Premium Refuse Service Charge Per Month:
Distance From Curb
Current Rate
Proposed
Charge Per Month
100 ft. or less $ 5.00 $ 8.00
101 - 200 ft. 9.00 13.00
201 - 300 ft. 13.00 18.00
301 - 400 ft. 19.00 23.00
401 - 500 ft. 21.00 28.00
501 - 600 ft. 25.00 33.00
601 - 700 ft. 29.00 38.00
701 - 800 ft. 33.00 43.00
801 - 900 ft. 37.00 48.00
901 - 1000 ft. 41.00 53.00
Item 2 - Redefinition of Backyard Service for Disabled Residents:
Disabled residents receiving backyard service will receive
the same redefined premium service without a fee.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Redefine premium service to include trash that is not part
of the normal household garbage such as grass, leaves, and
and other materials that can be containerized and weigh 50
pounds or less and increase the fee to cover the service.
This will increase the annual refuse revenues by an
estimated $3,750.00 to cover additional time required to
collect additional refuse.
2. Leave service and fee at present levels. This alternative
will limit backyard service to household refuse only, and it
would require premium and disabled service residents to make
their own arrangements to have any other materials placed at
the curb for collection.
The current services and fees are as follows:
Number of Customers Fee Service
40 $ 5.00 Premium
19 9.00 Premium
5 10.00 or more Premium
287 No Fee Elderly/Disabled
3. Redefine premium service with no increase in fees. This
alternative will increase service time and cost to the
county and require the department to absorb that cost.
t
RECOMMENDATION:
~~
Staff recommends Alternative 1 and requests approval to
amend the Resolution covering premium refuse collection service.
This will require first and second readings of a proposed
Ordinance which will be scheduled June 14, 1988, and June 28,
1988. It is further requested that a public hearing be held on
June 28, 1988, for public comment on the increase in fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Gardner W. Smith
Director
Department of General Services
APPROVED:
'1
Elme C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) A ternate Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
to Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Gardner Smith
John Hubbard
ACTION NUMBER
A-51088-5
ITEM NUMBE~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Proceed with discussion of
cooperative ventures suggested by The Roanoke
Valley Cooperation Committee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: >>
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
On April 22, 1988, the Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee met
for the first time. This committee is made up of officials from
Roanoke County, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and
Boutetourt County. Roanoke City has not yet appointed members to
serve. Representing Roanoke County are Supervisors Steven McGraw
and Richard Robers. At the meeting, it was requested that the
members bring back to their governing bodies a list of potential
cooperative projects that were suggested for future review.
Attached is a copy of the minutes of the April 22nd meeting for
your review. They are a draft and subject to change at the next
meeting on May 13th.
Supervisors McGraw and Robers will review with the board these
suggested ventures and ask for approval to proceed with further
study on the feasibility of cooperative efforts concerning these
suggestions.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-~
-----------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Harry C. Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Nickens to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Roanoke Valley Cooperative Committee File
_~
DRAFT
For Discussion Only
Subject to Revision
ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING
APRIL 22, 1988 - 2:00 P.M.
ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
PRESENT: Donald Davis, Vinton Town Council
Forest Jones, Assistant City Manager, Salem
R. E. Layman, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors
Steven A. McGraw, Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors
George Nester, Vinton Town Manager
Richard Robers, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Jack Shelton, Vinton Town Council
Wanda Wingo, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors
Mr. McGraw opened the meeting and thanked everyone for
attending. He noted that the City of Roanoke did not have
representatives present, but he had been informed that they
may appoint members next week.
Mr. McGraw emphasized that this committee should not be
seen as a step toward consolidation, but should serve as a
brainstorming group to study potential cooperative efforts in
which several or all localities could participate.
The Committee reviewed a list of present cooperative
ventures, including the newest effort, a Roanoke County-Botetourt
County joint library, and a joint economic development project
between Roanoke County and Botetourt County.
Mr. McGraw suggested that the members discuss projects in
which their locality could profit from a joint effort or a
consolidated service. The following recommendations for study
were discussed by members of the committee:
Building Inspections• Mr. Shelton suggested this was an area
that the committee could study because it was confusing to the
valley citizens who had to deal with different regulations and a
:different process in each locality.
Asbestos Control and Removal: Mr. Robers indicated it might be
possible to begin this project on a valley-wide basis, by
certifying certain people to handle this for all localities. Mr.
2
-5
Layman noted that no one in the Roanoke area is presently
certified to remove asbestos and it may be necessary to bid this
out. It might be cost-.effective if the project was bid jointly.
School Buses: Mr. Robers also suggested the possibility of a
joint contract for school buses and a central garage for school
bus and vehicle maintenance. Mr. Shelton pointed out that a
central garage could allow maintenance staff to become
specialists in certain areas which would raise the overall
quality of the garage.
Central Purchasing Department: It was suggested that it is more
costly to bid on purchases independently, and there might be
considerable savings in one central purchasing. Mr. Jones
pointed out that the school and city purchasing department in
Salem was now consolidated.
Schools: Mr. Robers indicated that all localities might wish to
consider the "electronic classroom".for classes that are not
available at all schools because of the lack of students wishing
to take them. Ms. Wingo noted that Botetourt County can't offer
the variety of classes that larger localities do, and perhaps by
cooperation, specialized classes could be available to all
students regardless of their jurisdiction.
Building Maintenance: Mr. Robers and Mr. Shelton agreed that
contracting of maintenance as a unit could result in substantial
cost savings.
Economic Development Efforts: Mr. Layman pointed out that this
project is already a joint effort through the Regional
Partnership, but joint efforts should continue. Mr. McGraw
added that the Blue Ridge Region has been active for two years in
marketing the entire area.
Insurance Coverage: Mr. Robers advised that healthcare costs
have risen 950 over the past five years. If insurance such as
healthcare and liability could be consolidated and bid as one
bolicy, the localities may be able to save money.
Library Services: Mr. McGraw advised that since the Roanoke
Valley now has one library card, the possibility of a regional
library system should be studied, which would include the area
college libraries. Mr. Jones stated he thought a study on this
issue was being conducted by the librarians, and included
Virginia Western Community College library.
Mr. McGraw recommended that a facilitator be asked to chair
the committee. This would give the committee an objective leader
to handle the meetings and keep the discussions positive. The
other members agreed and Mr. McGraw said he would bring a list of
potential facilitators to the next meeting.
3
,~' ~ ,°'~
Mr. Robers proposed the use of VPI as a resource for future
discussions. He suggested that there are many services available
at the school such as the VPI Productivity Center. The committee
may be able to utilize students who are working on their
doctoral thesis and may wish to study some of the possible
cooperative ventures. Mr. Nester added that the Town of Vinton
had utilized VPI and found them a good resource.
Mr. McGraw recommended that the localities study the legal
implications concerning agreements such as extending arrest
powers across jurisdictional boundaries. Roanoke County has an
Arrest Power agreement with several localities, and these types
of agreement could be expanded if there are no legal
ramifications.
Mr. Layman proposed that all the localities in southwestern
Virginia should unite in dealing with the General Assembly and
state issues in order to compete with the larger areas such as
northern Virginia and Tidewater.
It was also decided that subcommittees should be
established to work on the details of any projects that the
committee adopted for further study. These subcommittees could
include staff from the various localities.
It was agreed that the committee members would take the
suggestions back to their governing bodies for discussion. It
was pointed out that some joint ventures might be feasible only
for certain localities, while others may be feasible for all five
localities. Several members of the committee felt that insurance
would be a good area to begin a study. However, several other
members stated they would rather bring all the proposed
cooperative issues back to their governing bodies, and let each
jurisdiction decide which projects they would like to study
further.
Vinton Town Manager George Nester offered to host the next
meeting on Friday, May 13, 1988 at 2:00 p.m. at the Vinton War
Memorial. Mr. Robers and Mr. McGraw will investigate a possible
facilitator for the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
`maw t~/ fez--,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
ACTION NUMBER A-51088-6
ITEM NUMBER ...~ '°' ~/?
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM:
Request for Authorization to Proceed with an
Employee Wellness Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~ U
~ ~u~~ ay '
BACKGROUND
The Department of Human Resources was requested by the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to complete a study on
employee wellness programs. One benefit of an employee wellness
program is a healthier workforce which could lead to lower health
care costs. Other benefits are reduced employee absences and
increased productivity, satisfaction, and morale.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The Department of Human Resources contacted the Roanoke
County Health Department, other localities who have implemented
wellness programs, .local fitness facilities, and community
resources in the study. There are a variety of wellness programs
currently on the market, some of which may be very costly to the
employer. However, there are also a variety of community
resources which promote wellness in the workplace. One such
community resource is a program sponsored by the American Heart
Association entitled "Heart at Work".
The Heart at Work Program is a comprehensive package
designed to promote cardiovascular education and disease pre-
vention at the workplace. It consists of materials for programs
to encourage employees to control high blood pressure, stop
smoking, eat wisely, exercise regularly and recognize early
warning signs of heart attack and stroke. The Heart at Work
Program provides step-by-step instructions on how to implement
such a program including coordination with other community
resources such as the Roanoke County Health Department.
- ~~
The Heart at Work Program is new to the Roanoke Valley. The
program is currently successful in three thousand companies or
other organizations in the United States. The City of Lynchburg
is currently participating in Heart at Work and the City of
Roanoke, Shenandoah Life, Allstate Insurance Company, and Crestar
Bank have signed a pledge of support to participate. In
addition, several other large employers in the area are con-
sidering participation.
The Heart at Work Program offers five modules which
employers may implement in the workplace. These are: High Blood
Pressure, Smoking Cessation, Nutrition, Exercise, and Signals and
Actions (to prevent heart disease). Employers may choose to
implement all five or concentrate on implementing selected
modules. Employers may also select the level at which they will
implement the Heart at Work modules i.e. either at an employee
awareness level, an employee detection and screening level, or an
education and control level.
In order to assess employee wellness needs and select the
appropriate levels of implementation for the Heart at Work
modules, the Department of Human Resources recommends conducting
a Health Risk Appraisal through the Roanoke County Health Depart-
ment. The Health Risk Appraisal includes cholesterol and blood
pressure testing and provides county employees with recommen-
dations for improving their lifestyles to increase life expect-
ancy. The results of the Health Risk Appraisal are provided to
each participating employee on a confidential basis. However,
the Department of Human Resources will receive an overall assess-
ment of employee wellness needs. This appraisal may be conducted
annually to continue to determine appropriate implementation
levels and to determine potential cost savings of an employee
wellness program.
The Department of Human Resources further recommends empha-
sizing the smoking cessation module of the Heart at Work employee
wellness program. This will coincide with the study currently
underway on smoking in Roanoke County buildings. Accordingly,
the Department of Human Resources will coordinate smoking cessa-
tion classes and other educational programs.
The American Heart Association provides Heart at Work mod-
ules, speakers and reference materials, and staff training free
of charge. There are costs associated with purchasing desired
educational materials from the Heart Association ($300); costs
for the Health Risk Appraisal which will cover the cost of choles-
terol testing for all employees ($2600); and costs for the
Smoking Cessation Program ($500). The total first year cost for
the Employee Wellness Program excluding staff time is $3400. The
Department of Human Resources recommends that the funding for
this program be provided from the fiscal year 1987-88 Board of
Supervisor's Contingency Fund. The Heart at Work Program will be
effective on July 1, 1988, for Roanoke County employees. The
staff time required is estimated to be 150 hours, and this will
be absorbed through the Human Resources work program.
2
_... ~~'?
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
1. Authorize the County Administrator to sign an American Heart
Association Cooperative Pledge of Support to participate in
the Heart at Work Program. Fiscal impact will be $3,400
which we recommend funding through the Board of Supervisor's
Contingency Fund. The Heart at Work Program will be effec-
tive on July 1, 1988, for Roanoke County employees.
2. Participate in an employee wellness program sponsored by
another company or organization. Fiscal impact may range
from $500 to $5,000 per year.
3. Do not participate in an employee wellness program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Human Resources recommends alternative one
which authorizes the County Administrator to sign the pledge of
support to participate in the American Heart Association Heart at
Work Program, and that funds in the amount of $3400 be provided
from the Board of Supervisor's Contingency Fund for imple-
mentation of this program.
SUBMITTED BY:
D. K. Coo
Director of Human Resources
APPROVED BY:
~ixa/
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry ~ _ N; ~-kPns/
Denied ( )Bob L. Johnson n a~.=rnvP Garrett
Received ( ) * ~ ~-~-~~--~ ~ --~ ~ 1 Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Keith Cook
Diane Hyatt
Reta Busher
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
X
X
X
X
3
Z
M
F- ~
~ W
F- J
z ~
W O
i O
W ~
J
G Y
~~
h•I O
3
LL
C1 `
N
J F
W G'
W W
J S
N
N 1 I ro
N N Y •r 1
i ro r O L >. C
d •r I L 01 O N L O
7 +~ N O C U Cl U ++ v N
1 C 01 O ~ N- 01 L d
3 0 L >. •r C •• a+ w ro C r OI
O U Q a~ a~ O U ro N •r = ro
^ r ro +~ 7 U L ~ C
D C U +• C~ C C ro
O O 7 7 ro a ro C C J N E
w v o E~ N 7 v o o > N
'
N^ E d N I ^ u d\ o
d
- L D O d 3 7 a~ > ro r C N
^] U C U O N O
E L +' ro L
ro C ~ O j
C 'r
L C ~^ O N N N ^ O. 7
L T ro d C O U r+ C O: ~' •r O O
yD O) N •rLL C O d U- N U
C 4- C C L Y C O U ~- ro N d
O tv C O +- 7 O ~ O r ro '~ > •" ~
L o •r L C E d .r ,• u u d ,, a
y r 1+ O In 7 y. •r N a+ d ~ •r U
ro - r ro Y ++ C r r+ N d E ~ ^
d Y O/ ro U •r C ~ •r L Gl N O •r O •r D
> C C U 7 C ro d ~' r r N - L N N r U d
d d •r 7 ~ 0 a+ N C 7 C1 ro E w N ++ ro •r
J E c ~ d E^ •- o c ^ ro c 7 4- '~
I d d d 7 C U D U L N •r O w •r
t ~ d A N N ro N d m 'O L W- d +'
n QJ Q L D y L C m D L L 01 O O U d ro +' L
c7• E u c 7 7 o L c •- a~ c L o ro N++•r ro
v= n•I Vf ro C N U O ro = +' •r 4 w E A N N U
I O >•
L U C
N N •r O
I
0. L
d tD N O r N y L C
L pl L d ro L N U d 7
+, N y tD E ro d D^
-cs rn cs ro L a+ c o
N 7 ro C m ro L N C ro>
E^ d r N pl W C 7
Ill O a s m a O O N
L> N O L N L U O L•
m E a a > 7 N
O OI N N C - ~+ C
L C d CI O >. N ro O
ar U ^ ar r+ Q L r
N L d ro~ rU N da+
m 7 7 ~ +' r N~ L +~ ro
C O O N \ L L T O 'r ~'
•r. Cl N ~ L d y pl +~ - C
C 7 N d ~ 7 > U d
d l L s r C r 7 C N
C pl 3 ro C N L O d
o L O N +~ N N L 7 p1 +' r L N
__ U^U r Q y r N a+ aL
ply yl .- r s N - d •O ++ C U d
~ Ip O N d++ C.rr I d s
m~+ Lw y QL L C lp L Oro
J C N 7 ^ d 7 7 •r N N +~ ro N
pl ,r ~ O d N ~+ ^ d U N L N ++ Q
7 d D ro L I C L> N '~" r
L ro D L
amE Nro+~ do --c ocxa a^a~
v~ -~ W L O VI > J ro U ro d N In N ++
I
L '
N
d Y C
+~ u m ~
.r m r c ~
^ L N ro ~ ~
U C
. T p N C N
N ro N •r N N L r N L
L d L+~ L L 7Y^ 7
N tv 7 p) C d ~+ ^ •r a+
~.~ y,D ++o r rororo ro
N C N -r N -r N L 3 L L
O ro O L O ++ O N +~ pl
a ar a7 aa~- Y
C N D ro Ol •r
L O L•r L•-- L- U C
~ •r ~ U OI L Ol O -r
7v 7 7a+ 7u-
C O 7 O d O N O O U N
O L D L L L r L w >. C
,C r L 7 L~ L C O U O1
+~ +~ L a+ a• y a~ O •r r
•
i Ip a+ ro tD •~ N D N
y N N N L N L N +~ Q
d C N •r N Gl N 7 N 7 ro
> pl N D N N a• Ol a~ N D E of N
d E c r c•r c ro c•r c L
J d Ol Ol L d- d L y L L •r d
I ^ L L N L L N L a~ N C +'
.. t Q ro 7 N ro D ro +' ro N w C N
-- o f a v c a c ar ;rw 7 0
~Jr+ a m•r a ro a- a ~o L a
~ C
o c ro
O d O d
L O) •r N N N
d m 7 C ~' C
N U ro O.-.
~ L N Y L L C•rN
L OI Gt O r d OI a• Q
o r L E 7 x •~ u vl
~ =a In z w Ina
~-
~ ~
I4'
ACTION NUMBER A-51088-7
ITEM NUMBER ...1~. -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Classification Plan for FY 1988-89
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~ ~ --~ u
BACKGROUND
The Board of Supervisors annually approves the Classifi-
cation Plan for county employees in conjunction with the adoption
of the county budget. The Classification Plan consists of salary
grades for position classifications and incorporates the total
number of positions approved for the fiscal year.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The Classification Plan for county employees consists of
classified and unclassified positions incorporated in the pro-
posed county budget for fiscal year 1988-89.
The salary of members of the Board of Supervisors are deter-
mined by ordinance of the Board. The salary of the County Admin-
istrator, County Attorney, along with any salary supplements
approved for elected constitutional officers, are also determined
by the Board.
The salaries for other county employees, both classified and
unclassified, are determined by the County Administrator within
the limits of the adopted Classification Plan and appropriated
funds. The recommended salary structure for classified personnel
consists of 15 steps (A through 0> with increments of approxi-
mately 2.5~ between each step. The existing salary structure for
fiscal year 1987-88 consists of pay grades of 8 steps (A through
H) with precise 5~ increments between each step. In computing
the proposed 15 step structure, half steps of approximately 2.5~
have been added or averaged between existing steps A, B, C, D, E,
F, G and H. In a comparison of both pay plans, the minimum and
maximum steps are the same.
The proposed pay plan with 15 steps is recommended to allow
staff to begin implementation of a pay for performance system in
which employees will be eligible for salary increases depending
~~
upon the individual employee's level of performance during the
evaluation period. Once a pay for performance system is
established, we hope to be able to incorporate a minimum, mid-
point and maximum salary for each pay grade in which all steps
between minimum and maximum are eliminated. The pay for per-
formance system will be worked out with staff prior to July 1,
1988, and brought back to the Board of Supervisors prior to imple-
mentation.
In addition, the Classification Plan pay schedule has been
increased by 5$ to maintain a competitive salary structure with
comparable positions in area municipalities and in the private
sector of employment. The proposed pay plan also includes pay
grade revisions for positions in which salary changes were recom-
mended as a result of the market salary survey conducted by the
Department of Human Resources last fall.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a Classification Plan for
county employees for fiscal year 1988-89 with 15 steps, including
increments of approximately 2.5$ between each pay step; an
increase of 5$ in the Classification Plan pay schedule to main-
tain a competitive salary structure with comparable positions in
area municipalities and in the private sector of employment; and
pay grade revisions for positions as a result of the market
salary study. In the approval of this recommendation, employees
will be eligible for merit salary increases depending upon the
individual employee's level of performance during the evaluation
period, with total salary increases limited to an average of 5$
for the fiscal year. Individual employee merit salary increases
will also be limited to a maximum of 10~. The funding required
by this recommendation is incorporated in the proposed county
budget.
SUBMITTED BY:
~d%''~
D . K . Cook~'~
Director of Human Resources
Approved
Denied
Received
Ref erred
To
ACTION
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C . Hodge
County Administrator
by: Harry C. Nickens/
A. McGraw to approve Garrett
recommendation Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Keith Cook
Assistant County Administrators
(x) Motion
( ) Steven
( ) staff
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
Department Heads
v~ ~n v, .- ~ ('1
O ~
~-' G7
xl
r~ 0 0 ~ W
o ~n o o ~c a ~ 9 d
~ ~
r-~
~D bd
aD
G~ C C] C] c/)
H
~ ~ ~ ~ o
O O O ~ 7d
~ W ~
~ d
~
o t~
V
~ by
ao
r
H
Q1
n
c~
r• m
~ ~
p N.
r• rn
p r•
OQ n
w
/°
~C~ _ ~ ~ ~s
,~ ~ ~~
In V7 ~n r r•-• ('J ~-' G] In In C] ~-' G1 ~
f•-~ O O H W O
o
ov,oo~ I 9 ~ ~ W ~ 9 d w
m ~ ~ n
~ r~ o r~ c n
~ ~ co ~
0o w
r, ~.. r • m
~D bd ~ bc7 a r •
~ ~. r• rn
~O ~ ~ ~•
c~cnnv~ H ~ r y
'
w
~"t R G O rt r• (D w
o' ~
•
rr ~ rT
O r• m G O r* rh
a r• O r• (D
' N N m rt fD ~ ~ O
~C a
C3. rt t1 N T+ N CJ (D (D Q` C7
cn ~ r• rt fD Oo ~t ~O
~
~~a v o '
w w ~
' ~
t rt r
N N
A ~-
~" ~ w
r
fD fD V7 C7 rt ~O d 00 a
a s o0 o ao ~ a
w w oo n ~
'
~ ° ~
a
A
fD O ~ 7 ~
~ ~ r
N (v fD w
O O 00 CrJ ~ ~
ry rS
~O fD N
~' Tr' ~ r, r. F+.
m m a "+
r{ r{ r•
m fD
i.... r (D L1.
w N rt
"h ~ w
~ ~ rn
ao w 0 ~
n w
n n
~~
w N ro r • C/1
~ oo c~ a a ~.
° °~ '~ ~ a
.
H ('] (D G
C" ~-'
~... r-~ I ~ M tD
w ~.+ C!1 O
ox
o ~x r ~H ~O
~O ~ 9 ro
~ E ~
c
n i
r
Cn ~ f7 r• (D
H ~ a a ~
i..r r~ hi H 0C b
~ w H i•'r H hr
N H lJ1 H Crl ~O O E O
r l~ d 00 Z O `C
~ O OD 'i fD
ro ro a m
O C"' m m
m a
w y a
a
rocc~roro d ~~ c~ cc~ro d oc.,
o i
r .
w rr ro n n ~o ~ m rr rD w co v o r*
'
n r• a o o w a r• a n ~ z rn a
~- H cu n n w ~ H c~ ~- w cn r. ~
m r• 'i G G rt rt r• ri cn rt ~
G m
~ ~ (D ~ fD ~ lD rt
,'U' C!] lD fD a ~O x to cn ~ a N 7C to C
!D fD O a rt N fD (D fD r-r r • • ~+•
A M rt rt 00 ~"S ~"S f'1 v A
~
n C C e ~t
fD r. r• r• fD
O
w A A A w
rt (D ~"~ (D (D rt r rh
r• m
O ~ ~n
w r m
~ to r•
~ p ~
~n r
~o
a w o cn m a ~+ O
G N O O W ~
r•
~
G,• r•
a r•
a x
V U1 N N O
~n rt rt aD a
w (D (D
r• rt
`~
a
rt
(D ~"'
Q~ r-.
1.J7
h"1'1
a o z w z
w rn o "~
a v N
A z z rt
m o o ~'
m
r~ ~- r~
a\ In W r-~ r ~ a, N ~ ~ In rti
b l~ O O~ N ~-- r b O~ O r
V7 V ~
~ ~ A
w
W r-• r-• O O ~ ~ O O O
N
• O O
f3 W
In a
00 W O lJ~ (3.
(D N a
r-~ d r-- .
(D l~ d
V L~7 O Cr1
r ~
N ~
r-• f..
l~ W
V~ W OD b0
V ~
W ~D
~vcza cn y Hrr y
G G vi cD ~+• N ~• w ~'•
n m m n R f7 0' R fT
A r. f.. ry 1--~ ~-• 7' n w rr r
~ a ~ m m ~ o w m ~
w (p n rt ~ C7 r• n [=f N C•1
(A Ul w w N A ~C O ~-'
N• fA '~ n Oo w rt v
o rr ~c ~-' a n
00 o y `~
n z
f7C1.N ~ m ~•O ~
r r• p0 l!~ n m b ~
fD a ~+• W d C R fD V~ d
n w cn o r• w n ~
T' G rt N l) a w W
n n m rr rr
m w v, o
n n
H ~' a r"
",~ Vl Uf ~
Cn O~ [_] m ~C CI]
.~y V r • N
O ~ ~ DD
(~ R
R w
O O
n r f•t ~-•
O~ In
O 'rJ W '=J
O~ O
~1 N
~--~
~ r
~
~ G'1 rn G]
l!1 V
~D In
r- r
~
~''~ o x ox
~ v O~
p v
~-• i-'
v O~
N H l~ H
Qp Vt
N ~
~-.
~ r
~
rof~~ C]'T1•ecncnx ror~ir~ oroO d ~• rrcn d ~+
n O N O r• O ~• ~' G w G~ rt F-' O (D .~ r• r• G' fD O
O 9 Qo G a G fD lD ~ n 00 fD r• w O o' a' (D
~~ ~• a w n n n w x ~• n ~ a rn w n n n w
G ~+, cn rr G ~ r• r• O v, p 00 r+• O ry ri tU w r• n
n cn rr `G ~ ~+, n, co rD rr r • w n ~-• n n rn rY ~
fD m n (D x rn rn x Q+ fD o `C o r ~ oo ~C `C rn ~ V
~ r• w a ~ w ~ ~ fD n n oo fD ~- ~, ~ (D N 7C
fD O n G. ~ C ~ ro cn ;O r•~ Cn p ~ ro G oD
a s 900 ~ w o o m a sr ~ rt rn o R N
n O n rr r• n n fD N C r•
O (A H N• (D w < ~ (~ r r• r
rh rt R+ o m n r• r• fD ao O v
n o0 ~• ~ a~ ~ r o0 ~ r
~7 w bd O fD o0 ~ ~'
fD rt G Q+ O to ~O R+ ~
c o a
fD n oo H ~"~
~ ~ ~ a
G rt C r C r
N fD ~O (D 00
to O ~ ~ ~ ~
rr ~n rt ~
r• W r• O~
pp 00
w w
rt rt
r• ~-- r• ~
O ~O O OD
o ~ z a ~ z
N ~
~O ~O
O O
~ r N N ~ r-~ r-~ V ~-• ~--~ ~-• r+ r r•• F-+ ~ O N V7 ~--• ~ ~O
TJ OO b OO
• O ~
o, w
O~ v, ~ ~ ~ n r G7
rO•~ N~-• O ~
N DD O N 00 Q. ~O ,'D
N N d
00 Ci7
r
r W
W W
O
N
c~ R7 C E E H
O .L1 rt w w r
~ G r• U1 rt rt
r• rr rt fD r
G b r• (D H N
~
r
•(
D~C EO
A a w •o
w ~-.rR~u
r• ~ a n ~
O fD (D R
a A H O
m a' r K K
°
~ a
w ~
cu ~ • w rr c
A n rr 3
G" r• ~D
w O a
a a R
r•
A H ro
fD r
A w
a- a
a rt
r•
A O
r•'L7
w m
a K
w
R
O
K
H
H
H
d
c~roccc o
o w R R R
a K r• r• r• w
• x r r r K
m r• r• r• rr
(n R fY R
m a+ ~ ~e ~e ~o
a
C ~7 r
'r
~ O
\ A
C7 r'S
O (D
~ w
R
G r•
a O
r• a
n
w
R
r•
O
a
m
w
r•
a
n
0
a
w
a z
A o
r r r N ~O TJ
r
a` n
v
~n
r
O~
o d
a`
O~
~ L=1
r
Q`
DO '_]
V
O
r
V
N G7
N
F-•
v
V x
r
DD
r H
O~
r
V~ ~-.i
~O
0
o x
V~
W
r
~O
vi r
N
~O
N
O
O ~
O
rn
N
O
~z
0
a~
N
r
O O
O
a\
~O 00 OD aD O~ In l,l1 W N N N N
r 0 0 0 0 r O O N N r r
N •L~ W r ~p r V O ~ N ~ r
d C'1 f7 ('? by a ~ ro a H ;h H
cD O r• O G G O N A ~-t N w
'b rt C rs r• rt r•T r'S A fD w >C
G "t r• rj r 0 O~ O w ~'
r7 fD r fD (1. ~ r-S r• G to [~
`C n n r• w rr a G [17 r
rt ro rr a rt C+7 m rr M cn (D
CJ r+• ri r• Oq fD •L1 (D rt rt
°
~ °
a ~ K x
n
a
a ~ ~• ~ n
A v, o~ w~ b o o n m r+
G to r• (D ~ ri rj r r•-~
~• ~ m ro a rn cu x x co n
rr n
G K
n
n O N c rt H 7
~'• fD
no raa o r~ K
~ x
G G. n cn ~ t~1 b r
-i
K V) x fD A .n (D H
R H N G ~-S H
[]HC r• w
n r i--i r • ro 'L7 rr
r N A (D ~ O
(D ri (D -S tD rt
K x m m a
x O r* H
d a r1
H r• Q
~i 'TJ
fD (D
A ~-t
n w
O rt
'•t O
c7 ~n cn ~n 47 G7 ro t~ C d f] c c' 'T1 'T1 ro H C] C]
r ~' a' ~• (D fD w a rr (D O n r• r• r• w K O O
fD fD f0 fD a a K oo r• C ~ r• S a a n fD ~ ~
K K K K m m x ~• ~ o ~ r K w w x w~ ~
x r• r• r• K K rn a ~+• r r• r• w a a m cn r• r•
~+, rn ~r, w w co n o w R K A A G m~
O rh rh rh r-• ~-+ 2'~ fD `C b V1 ~C `C fD fD R+ K m m
rh ~ ~ ~ rt ~ r• ~ ~ fD r• r•
L. ro ~ Cn CA 7U r• fD O C n "~0 rS O O
f] w O w fD fD lD a a s rt fD fD a s
N• r• r N• rt r'S A Qq rt fD r• a A !D fD
rS r r• r+ C C ry ry r rt ri K rt
A A r• r• (p Q'+ r• K fD
G ~'• A A w O rt w w O O
r• a (D fD rr H rh ~C r rY r•h M
rr 00 cn ~n r• a r•
~~o cn ~ tzao zx
CJ R" G1 CA a b (D r• A a fD (D
O G O (p C r A C C
G H r• r A (D r 0 fD fD
~i a r r• n a r• G a s
rt C p. il. r• G a s G G
fD r+• O fD OG rt (D (D
m a £ a r•
rr oo w m a
r• O Od
QO ~ rr
w w r~
R N•
r• a
O R
a ro
a
w
a
A
r r N r N r N r V N r r r N~ r~ r W
I
10 1D 00 O~ N N N N ~
r+ O O O W N r-• ~ r-~
W 10 V1 .P O~ W 11t N ~
ddf~KirrH :~HGa
(D (D O r• a n fD w G
'v v n n~ m w x ~
G G ri fD G w r• r•
nn~ ~t ~ na
~e ~e n a~ w G r~ rr w
n a n ~ co m
f~ C~ r• ,b n fD rr rS m
r• r+ O fD (D rt w ~
~'t N a w ~ rr t-'
A ri fA n "+7 f7 fD H r•
G x G r• ~ ri n
r• ~ y fD ~C fD f~ H fD
rt n r• !D H 1-' a
o ~ max co m
o n~ ~ a t-+ x m
G rt C] ~' fn H H
rt ~ g a ~ `~ G m
N b r• rr b b
r O rt A ("1 rt A
co n w ~ C rr
n R R m r• o
~ fD r• H m H
1^t O ~ O
H a ~
H
fD
n
O
ri
a
G
b
(D
ri
C
r•
rn
0
H
~ ~a d
~
to CT1
r•
r
O~
00 bci
v
O
a H
r•
~ n
r• r~ -..
O
N• N C•1
m Oo
rt N
r{
w
fY
r• r+
C v
(p v d
~ ~
fD
A
~S
tD ~-'
rt ao
w ~ r~
n ~
~ rn
f-+
v1 n'J
to
r•-~
10
O G]
In
W
r
10
~~
N
10
N
O
O H
O
T
N
O
d Vl ~.r
CJ C7 to '=J 'rJ H .b C7 C1 CJ Cll cn f7 N O
r r-~ ~' r• r• M fD O O O A ~• O O~
m m co n a co w ~ ~ 9 0 r0 9 w
n n n m w w ~ ~ a ~ a n~ n
~• ~' r• a m r• r• r• O r• G R
rh R^ A G [+7 (n V1 fn ~ rh a 9 N
O O M fD ri Ul fn m Vi r• rh r• fD r
rf1 rh ~ ,R7 ~ (D rt r• r• r• A rY a O 7C
~~ n M w o 0 0 1C R o
n n w m m R a a a t7 0~
r• r• r• A G fD fD fD fD fD CJ]
~-t rt r+ G rt rf rS 't C (D
A A fD rt ,'D (D ~t
G G w m O O O ~-' C N
r• r• r-• cn M M rh O r• ~'
R rt m v n v1 r
~ CA 7d ~ .b ~ N W
~ ~
O O A ~ C C C a
G G O fD fD tD (D rt R+
a
r
t n ~ n G G G d N
r7 fD fD tD (D N
r• C O ~
a (D V1
00 ~-' ~
O
.b
(D N
a N
rt a, z
0
ao
z
0
Lz] N
W
lp
~p 00 OO v A ~ N N f•1 t-' G'1
00 W W r-• N 0 0 0 O In
~ V1 r r-J r+ In 00 r+ ~ O~ 9
~
lJ1 C=1
r
,r•
O~
O W
v
4J a C•] ;0 E CI] f] Cn H
p r• ~ (~ m QQ ~ a r*
G ~ ~ 1'i n r..0 r.. f-' r
n O
~ (0
r+ a w£ fD ~ n
x r• rt w fD fD ~
O C] f1 r• rr r{ ri d ~
•
O r*
N a rr a n a
rr r• QQ b w
znor~ c~
r• O a A w~ H C17 O~
00 ~ m w r• r• w a ao t7
~ a s a R R ~
R O O fD R fD O 'S O
M M ''4 fD M ~C
n ~, rn a
O r• r• w n
G C) A a O ~-'
a N (D (~ O v
CA rt K !D ri N t~7
a o
o
~ ~ N
0 o a
n n w
~ rt
w o
a n ~
r• v ~
n ~
OD
r-• G7
O~
OD
v1 x
to
10
r•
1D
O H
V1
W
10
d v1 c..,
~-C a cn b C t+7 ~ ~ tD N
o a ~' w R a w w lc
G r• (p rS r• QQ a a w
n g n T' rr r• w w n
y
~
r+ M R fD (D (D ~ N
~ N
~
~
w C] ~ l
D
n a O 7v
C O f1 ~ r• a s r* O
S a o ro a R R ~
a ~
n ~ n r~ H
0
H r
-~ a w ~-n rt1 N
r• R O O O
f1 r• 'i r't v1 t''
w o ~ ~ O
R a w w rn
r • rr rt
O r. r..
a O O
cn a a N
U1 UI r
O ~
`C ~C O
~ m O~
rt rt
f0 (D
~ ~
Cn CA N
.
f...
1,1 z
w
z
0
Ci] N
~•-~ r ~ N
r W 1~ O r~ N N r 'ty O O
1.11
rn
i
OoOOVO~O~~I~~r C~ ~-' 47 ~D Ool~l~W r C] r G7
~ W N r r N r 0 0 O 00 ".d QD W N O O O O v
OD 00 N W O In l!t N V t]. r ~ a W N ~! ~ DD W ~ ~ ~
fD d
~ [
ay N Cal
r
V ~-'
~
r ~-'
pp v
v~ W ~ W
~o ~-'
~O ~
C~1ronG~C~nroC17 H G1t-'dtyd t" H
r• r• w O n R O O k N• n A G a fD fD r•
A r'S r'S ~ O r• r r~ (D r'r O w r• Qo C 0o n
rr (D T." ~ G r r• r A r r G G. r r+• fD w rr i--•
r• m G a ~• G. G G (D ~O b G. a r r fD Oo
~ "rJ a n. rr n rr O C] C] r • tD O r (~
E oo A w o e w o a ao n~ cu rn
rr n fD n w w rt fD G~ a a r't
a (p A r• r• r• N a (A a w 0o r* tD
fD rS r't O a a a' fD ~-• C] r• N• n ~-'
w fD a R ~'* C] w A ~C O A a H~ w o0
m w m m fD O ~•* M ~n d G w n (D fD n v+ d
~"r a a ~' fD (D N p rr fD A C ~C ~O
f] ~• H w w r~ R ~O m r• a a' ~'• ~
O O N a a N fD w ~
O a A A A A a "i a a ~'• E
rj ~ (p (p rt rt `C O m A A
O. ~ a r• N n fD r• y ~
t+• b r• 'ay 'ay O H O O w fD ~
a (D A O O a a OLTJ H Mtrla A OCa7
w A r• n K m O i-n ~' a' ~
rt r• w fD (D 'z1 b O~ -'• (D p W
o w a~~ o co A A ~•
n ~ w w n A m rr A
~+• H a a (D rt n n r•
m ~ O N r• w r
rr w n O A a ~
a ~ .ay N. Vt "rJ
o w N
rn a ~
N N
r O
OC7 Ofi7
O O
O~ d\
N N
r O
v, x ~ x
,,,, o
r ~
N N
N i"'
O H O H
~ O
a` p'
N N
N r
CJ 'rJ b 47 b C 4J C C7 N O ~C CA 47 Cal d ('] C] tD W
p r• w fD w R (D rr O Oo O ~' fD a (D O O ~'
~ r•t r't a ~^{ r• a r• G w G (D a oo C M G w
8 fD T.' ~ r N r a n rr n fD r• (D ~ a n
O cn U] m r~• H r• n rt ~• r• rt a r O rt R
a rr m n w rr ~C g N ~-r, w co o a `C 9 N
E R+ rt R+ ~C r `C (D w x rn r fD b E (D N
(p ,b C a a r x w\ n~ N 9 a O 7C
w lD ~ m ~ cn G. rt ~ C n cn r• N w n rt vi
r to lD \ N fD ~ ~O (D O (D a a r rT ~
rt A A C7 A 'i r• a~ C Oo rt ~ O
•
m w o w A m N H a A cn fD N
f7 G r'f (D rt W r• fD H `C N
rt O r• p \ w W w\ m rt O
f7 a A a CA R Do rt GI b R Oo
O w O O r• G N O
~t rt r ri O r• n rt
a N. r. a r rr a
cD O CL N m G. ~+• !D N
~ • ~
m E w~ a
a r3
p~ r 00 Vi 1.1t
m
~ ~, ~
R ~
~. ~o w
a r•
r7 N a N
ru ~ R ~
a
~o z
m z
w N a w
"' a o0
° z z
co o A o
co
Ca] N Cal N
N ~ ~ ~ ~
r N r W N~ W N r •LJ l.n O W F r r r N r 'Sy W O
W r
W ~
I
V
I
~p pp pp pp pp QO 00 00 v ~ ~ ~ W W W N N N r r r C7 r 47
00 W N N N r r 0 ~--' W ~-' O O O O W N r N r 0 O ~O
N W Vt r O W r ~O W In ~O W O~ l,n ~ ~ 00 O~ N ~l ~O ~ O a
~
W CTl
r
r OD
~O
In G1
N
~O
G7 C] d d d d d d :h C E n C=1 tx1 C7 C ro a ro W d H
n G' !D fD fD fD fD fD fD rt w 0 ~-' G n n w m fD G (D r•
O r• b b b b b b A r• rt O (D r~• O r• ~C to n `C b rt
G N G G G C!1 G G G n r (D CA A r m r n O cn (D G ~-' N
•b M rt rt rr G rt rt n (D r+• n rT rt a m r+• O A O n rt fD O
~C ~C ~C b `C ~C ~C w n n n r• n r r• p ~e O f7
x n O n ~C O G r• p C'~ `C r w q O
O O CA CA C/] n v~ cn cn r • b A A Oo O n tD C7 ~
~ g a• o• x C x ~' 7 o c~ m rr w o by v~ N r r
~p ~ ~p (p (p r• fD fD (p O r n r• r H O r• G fD
G n n m m ~ n n (D w 0 p N rb a s n
f] O r• N• t+• O ~+• N• N• CA A f•t O H W A H (D b U7 7C N
O N• M M M n M M M G f7 N• ,^J 'b rt N• n b ~ O
G A M M M M M M b n O H fn fD r• ~ C n r• rt to d
O w t0 r• 0 0 b A O QO r• w m O O
m n I I I I I I n A m m fD R p m r• rt ~
~p f+. C r • b A O C!1 O ~ w by
r 0 [=1 C C7 CJ C] f7 r• w 'rJ fD rr n H G n (D G O
o a e g o 0 0 0 ~ p o A o o b n rr w
n W r• r• G n n n 0 n rr n m lD n N
a M n n n n n c~ o b n a r
H O O O R !D fO fD g n (D C O LTl
H M O n A A A w A r+• O O
M A ~ W R R f7 O rt CA M ~
r• (p w r• r• r• O O
A ro r• O O O n n cn
m n w~ o a a G
n G R r• cn cn m b N
m n M fD r
n O M ,Z7 H "t v' '~
p ,,•_, ~ n C w
a A w ~ • '-'
r• n G y
O
~ ~ ~
n O cn N
r• n N
'
O R O G
~
a w ~'
R ~
r•
O
O
N
N
a~ x
O
Oo
N
W
r H
~D
N
W
d ~ ~.
~C cn cn cn ~n cn cn cn ro C C t~f d d d'~7 ~i ;h x ro n to w
O ~' O•' 7" S ~' a' ~' w rt rt O fD fD fD r• r• fD G n O ~
G fp (D fD fD N (D fD n r• r• OQ C C G O O w~ O G w
.-r n n n n n n n 7~" r r ~• o ro ro w w r w A o n
O'r•~.~+•r•r• r•r•m r•~.p r rrO O O
17 G rt
n ~C rr
~
N
M M M M M
x M M M M M M M
M M R" rt R (D O O O A A C
~C `C (~ 'Z7 'b 'b
\\\\\
\\ \ \ rt (D
n ~ ~ ~ ~ a G W '~"
~ nrororoc, ~c.~ ~•co co cu Cnw v, m a rr r
(D O O O O w w w fD p p p p rt N rt 0 0 9 ~
a ~ r r r r• r• r• A 00 rt rr rt r• p (D G rt r•
~ r•r•r•r rrn rrt n O
H G A A A (D R" R'~ R^ r• n a A ~'•
H O r. ,.+. f+. w rt w m fD
N m N
A
r• O p 0
A 00 UG QQ rt
r• C r m (A
H H H
p G D fD R
n ~O C"
w O m v, ~~ a~ w N
rr R+ R+ R'+ O b b b r• A m rr In
r,. fD fD fD r A ~ O
O H H H A A A r O fD n
O ^~ ^~ ^~ R rt ft r• G a
m C C C r• r• r• O G rt N
cD fD (D O O O OG rt ~n
m m m p p p r. to ~
r• r• r• 0Q W
QC QG OG
w w w
ft rt rt
r• r• r• N
O O O a'
a o o r z
r
z
0
L17 N
W r W ~ ~
r r r .~ O r r r W r W~ N N r r r N r W r OD O
r
O
I
00
00 ~! ~t v ~ ~ n N O DD DD DO OD OD OD 00 v O~ O~ O~ ~--• A ~ ~ W W W n N
O O O O N ~O O ~-' ~ O~ Vt N N N r•r ~--• O~ t~ 0 ~-• N t--~
O~
~
~ O
O N N r~
r O O~ O O
9
O~ ~! O~ Vl O ~D ~ 00 a O N ~ ~ ~ N lJl
O
N N Q~ W N l fD O d
a\ C~7 a\ C=1
N ~
O ~
N N
~. O
V7 W lJ7 W
W O
~-• ~
dyz~Ero y rodt7dr~t7r rc~c~lzr~ccn Cl~ NC]a H
lD fD lD ? w n r• w cD (D cD fD tD tD r• O n G G n O w O O cn r
b A M r• rt O rt "'S 'C b b b b b D' ~ O r• N r• ~ a s ~ m rt
~ G ~' t0 r fD 00 r-~ N w G G G G G G n ~ G ~ r• rr r• [!~ r• r• ~ p rr N
o rt a r3 p• rt rj (p N ~ n rt rt rt rt rt w G a C. a r• G. G R a G (~ fD ~"
G ~C r' • N ''t w O C~ !D ~C ~C ~C ~C ~C ~C M a a r • (D n b w oo a r+• O C1
a A a N O 3 to f3. r+• r• to a to ~C E tD ~t r• w O
m cn w n a b g rn ~ • v~ cn v~ cn cn cn w A ao v~ w n ~t r~ R rr o~
m a• ~ rD -~ c~ n a' a• ~ a• a• x a w ~ ~ m e a ~ co
~. ~p y rt rt ~ fD fD fD /D fD fD rt w ~ r w rt r• CA M
O ~"I [A r w~ ro n n n n n n r• r• w r• r• fD to N O d ro
'i r• (D r• C/~ n O N r• r• r• r• r• r• r• O a r• A a O E n p ~-' N
rh ry (r (p r• •b N rt M M M M M M a r7 ~ fD R o n N (~ C w ~"
M C M rt O (D C~ d fD M M M M M M m fD rr a (D b rt (D (D a ~n d
~• w e a n o M a m~ a m ~~ a w
1 f) rt r• m w oo r• I I I I I I H w a fD w n Ci7 N O fD ~
~ ~• n rr ov m a w a w < a b n
n e w co cn o x n c n .-c n ~ A A a a n n w n~
O a~ G n R O a n 0 0 0 ~• fD f~ G N r• r- (D
r j t-+ 'ty N N rt ~' • r• G rS rt a (D n. O G O a N
~ r+• r N W 'S ri M~ rt r•{ rS Ir • (n r• C/1 a w M rt N
(D t7' N• rt r- C~7 (D O r• a' fD fD f) G Cl) rt G y n M
' O C17
n rt a' < ~n A ~t a f) (~ r•'l7 G O b r• r• f
1 v~
R w n ~• .c rt~ w w rt R w m •v n m v~ o n o rn
r• ~t w~ r• ~ a r• r• a M tD H G a fD O
p r• ~-t O O ro t1. O O C rt C TJ ~ ~"S rS
a w r• 'i a w r-i a s H rJ • C r• (p ~7 G.
m a w N ~ rr a 'T1 m cn r-i m ~'• m n N r• N
a ~,,~ 't C w O ~n O C ? a N
~7 v 't7 C] O fD ~ f7 r n O n r• w w Q~ 'rJ
fD W O h--• U1 r • Y-• r • r'I V1 ~ rf O
a' 00 't rt F-+ w ~ O ~ • O Oo
w b C] r• ~e ~ n n ~ n
D' O O Oq to w r•
r. n n w cn ~• n r*
rr N w b rr N M r• w N
R W O n ri C A a ~+•
w ~ w r• w O ~
rt v rr f) rt a
~... fD r•
O cn O
a a
N N
~ .x V '~'
N w
~ ~
N N
~ ~
In H W H
W ~
W v
N N
~
~n r rrc~ d °~~• rocncncn~ncnv~rc~roc~c~cc~c rororo d ~.,
a' N• ~+• r• rt w (D ~ r• ? ? O• ~' ~' O' r• O w fD O rr fD n r•r r r (D N
m v' o' o• r• a ~ n co rD m m m m c a n a b r• a r• w w w ~
n n n n~ w w ru n n n n n n n x cu ~ ~--~ ~~ a a a w
r• w w w r•0o n r• r• r• r• r• r• w v) ~ n r• r• ~-i r• a a a n
r-ry ry ry rt rt (D rt R'+ M M M M M M r'S fD w m R w rr r• F,• r• rr
M `< `C ~C `C ~ ~ N M M M M M M ~C ^t R+ h+ fA ~C ~' ~C ~ .'• ~ ~ N
~ !D fD O~ ,n7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C r• OC 00 00 fD t17
c. a a oox rD c,rororoca~ w ~cno ~n ~~~ a v,x
w rt rt ~- m w 0 0 0 w w ~ (D fD a fD N N N rt W
r. O A r• ~+ r, r•• r• r• f] A ~t (D rt O O O W
r-~ H G rr r• r• r• rr 1-• O ~"t < ry C a a a
p fD n A A ~ fD r• r• r. f+• r•
M r• r• r• ~ w A o A a a a
O N a a a G rt fp M fD Ov o0 0o N
ooavoo a ~•~ ~ a`
~ ~r
~•o ~x r
w oo a~ rr Ir n a tz m cn .~. v
rt O w G C O N
N• H H H R N• fD !•r I
O a a a ~'• ~-• a ~'• `C
O C C C O G3. G Cl. r't
N (D (D (D a ~'• (D N
(!1 00 m cn m m a E G] O~
~C, rr '„~ R f7 Pf QQ w ''t Oo .~
m ~n r• r• r• ~ m w ~
rt o t7o 00 0o w ~ r* a o
rc w w w r• w ro rt
~ rt rT rt G r. •~
rn r• r• r• n a
N O O O fD ~'T N
h
a a a v
o
o z ~ ~ ~ z
v, a w ~
~ n ~ o
f D z
a r0 0
L"+7 N ~--~ C+7 N
N r N r ~-• N ~ ~D O~ ~ ~ r--• d~ r ~ ~ r-+ t~ ~-• o--~ i--~ I-+ r•-+ r i--~ N ~ 00
•b v~ O b '""' ~
~ ~
pp O
I
1
~O 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o V N r ('] N G7 Oo v N C'1 N G7 Oo 00 0o Oo Oo .
00 V~ In lf~ W N O O r r N O W ,~d X 0 0 O N jU •G W r r W
r-•t•n.~W~A00V ~~IO~ a a W ooN Oa a O V InOO~
~ ~ ~ ~ ry
~O C~1 O~ L~7
N N
N ~-'
N N
W N
V Gd O~ bd
W O
~ ~
G~C~dC7t7CC1t7xacn y axro H roro dd a
n m N N fD lD fD fD fD b fD r• v~ fD n r• r• r• (D (D p
ob bbbbbb nb to rt UI w o rt n n bb r.
G G G G G G G G n n~ r N r• Cs. 00 r-• N N (D CA G G g
b rt rt rt rt rt Pt rt (D w G (D ~ fA n (D W G rt rt w
~C ~C `C `C `C `C `C w ~+• F'• W C7 R t-' w r C7 t' H 'O `C ~C r
x rt y n /--• w r• ~ V7 r+• p (D
O C!1 C/1 fA CA CA C!1 (A r• (D fD V ~ O' ~O N m n cn cn C]
~ G' ~' ~• a• ~ ~• ~• O n O rt n !D G b C ~' O• O
w w~ w w cu rD rD a rt w n rt rD ~• co ~o O
n n n n n n n m ni n m n w n n rt
ro ~• r• r• N• r• r• r• ro O N r• N• N p rt O r• r• n
n M M M M M M M n ~ ~ n w W w O n M M 0
O M M M M M M M O N• ~O d fD G ~I C7 a n M M ~-'
~ rt
F-~
~ 1 I I I 1 1 I In ~ OD f 1 Cl]
g cncnnc'1 cnn dg ti7 n C~C]b
(D fD n ~ fD O ID pC w O O N
C] n n r• r• n n b C] tD N O' N n n n
o e C g~ oo n w o ~ v. w ~ n n e
O r• r• N M (D (D n 0 G l!~ C=7 r-• W CrJ N N r
n n l1 w n rt n rt W r n n w
a m ~o ro n a rt g a r• w v rt rt 0
r• m m n r• rt w N r• C r• r• n
r9
O ~ ~
i
N Cn CA G ~ C ~ ~ R
rt (D (D (D G O N w rt d N N y Ul
O n n o r• r• r-+ O r• O~ ~
n oo Ov rt rt M Cn n n r '+y .o ro n ro
fD fD r• O tD H (~ v N r w
w w o n n n n ~ r ~n w n
O
~
N r• O
n n
G y g
n row o n r• co
rt w O r• N N M c~.
rt rt p O~ In r,• r•
~ n Ov aD c~ ~n G) ~ ~
w o ~ w w
r• r O W ~'*
`.. r
r• O
M O
M N N
~I Q~
~ x ~- x
00 ~
O r
N N
W ~
r--• H O~ H
In ~-'
O O
N N
00 V
'C cn cn ~n cn ~n cn cn ro ~ n d oo ~. Ki r ~ d ~ ~ hi Ki cn m a
O G• p• G• O• .~' R' G• w fD O tD ~n r • r • w fD oo r • r • O• ~ p
G (D (D (D fD f0 fD N n w G ~ n cr G O n n m (D r•
~-* n n n n n n n ~- r p w co n w w co ro n n g
a' N• r• r• r• r• r• r• m rt n w OG n f'• r• w
M M M M M M M C'+'7 `C rt R'~ ~"'{ (D rt R'~ R'• M M r--•
x M M M M M M M R+ m ~ N ~C ~ ~ N M M
w ~~~~~~ rt a ~ .o ~ w co oo z~ ~ ~ ~ n
c ro ro.~yc.roc. xw a p ~x cu o o ~x m m ~ ~. o
co 0 0 o w o w rD rt g rt ~.n cn rt rt v, ~ y w w o
O r--• r-• r-~ r • r-• r • (7 (D r • 00 f) O n n r • r • rt
r• r• r• r-~ r• r+ n O G H G G ~-' r-• n
H C7 f7 n f7 (D a ~'• (D ~ (D fD O
H N• N• r• r• w m to M ~
G O G O rt m rt W O N
pp QQ pp Qp r • (D n O n Oo
O to w N ['' g W t''
t7+ R~ R'~ R'~ G m rt ~D w ~n
_
O V rt ~
H H H H (D n 1-'•
C C C C rt G
lD fD (D fD W N
to (n ~ fn t-• Cn ~D
rt rt rt rt O ,~ ~Gi 111 .'3',
r• r• r• r• w cn ~n
rt rt rt R
r• r• r• r• m
-O O O O W w
O a ~ ~ r- O
00 Z N z
r-• ~D
N ~I
z z
0 0
r Cpl W C~7 w
r-• r r-• ~ i--• O ~ r• f-+ 00 ~ ~ N ~ W N ~ r-• lJ~ ~-• r-• ~ r
v~ O O O
• 00 W
v rn
W OD Cb 00 1~ ~ W N N r r C] N G7 Oo Oo Oo Oo Oo Q~ ~ N C1 N G7
r N r r r 0 r N O N N O In "~ O~ •L~ ~ l~ W O N O O ~
9 "rd
00 ~! v Q, W A N ~O In ~ r ~ W 9 ~ O lr N r ~O W GO W
(D ~-' d
W ~ v [a7
N N
~ w
N N
~ ~ ~O bj
v N
r ~
Cal t7 t7 r C c~ "ci 'a7 ro a 'v H cl tal Rl 'al 'li H C c~ H
A fD fD (D rt r• r r• n Cn fD r+• 9 ~ r• r• r• (D rt O r•
p •ty •d •p r. C w a 0 y n rt (D lD n n n A r• ~ rr
a G G G r r+• a w 0o r• cn r N n n fD fD fD a' r ~y r N
O rr rr C] rt r• r a a n ~ O (D ~ oo Oc a r• G fD In
'
~ `C ~C ~• `C rt A A w rt a oo CJ fD (D n ~ R+ r• rt rt In (
]
r• N• ~C Ca7 n r• E w a r a a w w A ~C (D W
A cn m m cn a w 9 a to o A A •c n z w n
' w
a' a' rr, ? C+7 0o r lD rt r `C ~C rr w tD r f
1
r m co m a ~• n w a' ~ 0 0
(D n n ~noo a a n Y ~cn~•w A ~Ob
C r• r• (D r• r• tp a 9 0 a N (D fD p r G tD n fD N
(D rh rh Q. hri a (D w a G w v ti. n (D n G. n O~
rrn rh r•rhlD n rw a ~--~ ~ d r•C C r•w r d
O A (D `C r rt ~C ~ A r• y r• a rr v
b 1 I w I n H m ~C ~C m O w A n A w r• r
~ r n cn rr r (D w fD rt 0
c~r~ r Ra ~ ~•cnoa
a r. O O r• rt m a n m
rt o n rn m rr N co O ~' • O N
G n rn G O oo n rn a rn Cn a\
CA rt (D r • rt n r Cal C r-h OG rn G Oo C+l
b (D A A (D a L^ r• ~'' r• b r
~p a r7 Ip D ~p O A A O A fD O
A w r• n w ~C fD fD M fD n
~'• a 0 a m n rn n C
w rr a rr t... r.
r rn N CA A cn N
r• I Oo G fD O ~
y r. ~ oo 'al b n n .r` ~
rt r. C7 v~ (D ~
(D O ~ C O
G n
rt n r•
(D (D ~
a A N O N
w rr
a r. ~c
~n 4~ n ~
r O
rt O W ~'
a ao O
W N
h
,! ° ~ o
o x
o ~ "'
i ~ ~
W N
r ~
O H In H
W ~
O~ ~
W W
tal cn ~ cn C tal ro ni ~ c7 x d oo c, nl "a1 gal 'al Kl "al ~ ~ d ° c~
A ~ 7? rt a ~-'~'•w O G (D r r•r•r+•r+•r•N•rt w fD ~O
O f0 (D (D r• 00 w a a G~ N n n n n n n r• a v
a n n n r r• a w w a w w ~ ru rD ro rD m r w w
O r• r• r+• r• a s a oo n a n r• oo n
'""
~ R+ rr tr s?+ cr R+ ~
;e
r • rh r
h rn `C N a (D ~ ~ W ~ ~ w
A \ \ \ n 00 ~ lD 9 O (D N ~ 7d :h :~l .'~ ;v fD fD r
'l7 C., C.+ r• ~ ~ a rr m a lJt 7C lD fD !D fD fD (D a O O 7~
d O w w a N w n r-r O n oo cn m cn m rn m rt rr W
(D r r• r• Oq O a O G ~ A A A A A A O~
C r+• r r a w H n n G G G G G G H
m A r• oo a a A rD co ce m m m a
A
A
C t
n
O a QO 8 O ` w O w
Q° ~ o
~
a ~ ~r or
fD R+ rt w O w ~'
a R N R N
rt H R'+ t'• ~''
C G1 a a
(D G W W
rt 00 `C N ~ `C vi ~
r+• (0 m r m ~
QQ rt rt v rT v
R
r• m ~
O w w
° ~
o z z
~, o
N N
z z
0 0
t~ w to w
r W r r r N N r W r r-J ~ lJ~ r r r r r r r r ~ ~
~O O b N O
N ~--'
W v
1
r-•
~O OO 00 ~I W N C"~ N G7 O~ 1~ N N CJ N n ~ mo
mo ~o~
°
I
v
~orn
I ro
~o O
cs ~
oo a ;
d
a
o ~a ~ , ~ ~a a .
~ o ~ r o
0o t~ o t~ o t~
N N N
v p~ l1~
W N N
O DD V
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ O
:v c7t7ac~cn H c~c~c~r y a y
!D fD (D to a' ~C r• O r• ? fD r• m r•
QQ 'C b to r• to rt ~ C r• w n m n
r• G G r• fD R ~-' W ~ r+• fD G. rr N r~• rr N
m rr rt m rh fD fD r-• G r-• rn (D ~O m fD Oo
"
rt ~ ~ R ~ O CJ G ro l.Jl CJ I't ~ (
]
M w W m w ~• c21 a n v~ w ~
w v~ cn O G O~ f7 p f7 O oo G O
rt G• ~' rr w a w oo r7 0o r*
fD fD r-• G rt r• O 't
~"i ri d C1. w r• G G w d
r• r• r+• r+• H W O (D G
~ W r• N
Oo
rh rii rS G ~
rh M N OQ m F-'
OD d G fD rt
m rt w tD O
N d H
(D oo d
n rt t-+ O ry ~p A 1.J1
I 1 rt O N f'1 H rt ~ rt ~
H O
C7 C7 ~ M G
O
w o ,..
•v n o n
w n w
a ~
w
o
N
r7 r'I hY1 r•
w co w N
v, c~ r• `C
o v, f•-~
o r~ rfi ~O
v, ~
r• n ro rr Oo w rr w ."'~ ~
G rt w v rr O~ fD o0
~ • H O w
O T
'"t t
--~
G y
m
W
W
[_]
W
C] ~ 'z7 00 "rJ rt N "+7
w O r w ~
.b N N rt ~
R ~
~ • W W U7 W
N47 v~G7 fD O4J
,~ 00 to W
V V ~
~
lD
W W rt W
~ w ,...
ox ~x oox
v o '"
N N N
W (~ W
~ ~ N
~O H N H lJ~ H
N ~' ~
Qp V V
W W W
g ~
ro cn ~ ro d ~ d o c..
a G~ ~ ro ~ d o c. .h C7 ~
m~~ w co w co N m G r-• • w m ~ m rD o
pp (p (p rt C O O~ O OV G a N w N
~• n n~ m w w r• w w w ~-' w
m r• r• m ~--~ 00 ri CA a G OC rt M
rt rn rn O (D rr fD (D f~ fD rt [17
~' rT
~
w
rl ry-, rn R^ b B 9 W 's ~ N ~ ~ W
w ~ ~ ~ m m v e n ~ ro co ~n rr m ~
ri ro~ 7d fD 0 O ~I x m r• C] p p ~D 7C w G N 7~
O w (D G R rt N ~ ",] fD R rt N R rt ~'
~--~ N • (~ R ~ CJ OQ G 00 (D V
•~
~
tD a+G 9 n o a
r • w i-n 9 w ~"~ ~'
G ft H O W G ~ O W ~ W
00 r • O 't 00 G rS O~ lD In
o m a rn r r- a~ oo r cn o r
sr o b w rn ~ ~ w N ~ ~
(D rr ~, w n rr rn ~ N
H C) r• r'r O r• (D
G n O r• G O G
C r• G O G G rt
(D O W O rt W W
~
•
R UI ~ rn ~ O
`C V .'~ ~ •'~
r• to ~ ~ 0Q u~ N N
ao R o w n ~ ~
w m ~• m
rt ~ ,^1. ~
r • to rt to
O l~ fD W W
o rn o
rn z w z z
O O O~ N
1-+ (~ V O~
~
O O O
Ci7 l~ C~1 W LT1 W
r~ W ~ ~ ~--• ~-• ~ r-• r ~ rr f-+ ~ ~p ~' ~ V
tnO rnO v O
~p r N
~--• O ~
i
r
N
00 00 v W r (7 W L7
~ N r r N O A "•0
~c ~o v, v, ~ m ~ a d
v C=7
W
O
W
V'i
O Gi
V
N
cnc~atycn ~]
(D ~' m r. (D N•
p r • rn ~c p i'+
r• (D r• tD r• r W
0 1-h (A n 0 fD to
r'S rt rt ri ~O n
d w o N
a m a n a ~
fA b R CA
m G O ~
N• rt d M N•
m ~C r• u~ w
f'f ~ Cy R C~
w cn ~ ~ w aD d
O O' A C p N
rt O R fD rt O~
~'i O ~-•'
CJ f+• r't O (7
M
~ r
n O ~ G W
M
Q
O R V Cz1
m R~
E ~
~ ~ ~a
w n rt
r fD H rt
rr w p O w
,7 R V1 rt 00
r• b p O~ "rJ
N O fD fD ~
G n ~ ~
a rt
rt r•
rt O
O O W
~'i ~
N O\ O
~
~ O
O
o~ x
O
r
Vl H
~O
r
N
n cn ro d n d o~ c,
w (D ~
S C G
~ N ~
~ n ~• m o w
Q N• UJ r R rj
~
E rh R'~ b ~ ~
m ~ a m w
w ~u co R a rn x
r (D O r7 rt ~!
rt n rt O r
a' n n
N R+ p
~
ft H ~' ~
n
• ~ ~
o r
n p •O o~
O fD N
~i f)
,"~ R
fD r•
~C O ~
~ OD ~
In
o z
0
z
0
~ ~
N r r r r ~ pp
b r O
V
~O l~ ~ ~ N f7 W G7 ~-' C] W G7
0~0O Nlr
a
a r
~ O
~ r
O
a .'17
C
~ ~ O W
~ o~ ~
N N
~O ~
W W
W r
~ by oo Go
O r
N N
c~aaad y d y
~-i m m m r• r• ~• r•
O VJ Cn (A r'S rt M ~" r
G r• r• r• fD rr W O F•-' W
R7 m m cn n N ~ n fD N
rt K rt Pr N n f7 ~ n
x w m w o r o ~
O O G O i"1 v rt v
~ R fT R
O O
C d d r-h ~"r+
b rt N• N• W ~''~
M r • ~"S M ~ ~ "d W
O r fD fD ~ O d rt l~ d
OQ r• C) n p ~ O O
r{ r7 rt rt 0.1 N n N
~
~
ri ~ O ri
O (D
~ r
. O O fD W ~ ~''~
M M
G
•r
r
a (p ~D C+7 G N t=7
W f1 47 C=1 N f7 r
OG rt fD '.y R^ OO ~
(D O O 00
n n m ~•w
~-t D G
w co a w w
r tD 00 O~ ~^
H (D 00 "rJ O "rJ
U] r+• Pt N v
(D O O~ N
r'S 00
C
r•
n
W
W
O J
~
~ G] ~O G7
N N
~ ~
W W
pp O~
rn x oo x
~ N
v O~
W W
~D ~
Q~ H V H
r N
O ~
l~ W
o r. ~ ~ w co o n ~ ~
G r• a 00 G ~-• O v
rt r fD r• fb W n W
a' r• rt G 00 rt G rS
~ r
ry fD
p1 fD r ~ fD ~p
C cn ~• a ~ v~ x ~ a rn x
fD fD p rt rt ~O p I•t r
a rs QQ r R O
C Q+
H r•
~
~ ~ ~ ~
m G. N O
av rn r o~ r
m w o
n r ~-'
~ ~
W r
~ ~ ~ ~
V
h... ~O
r
~ ~
~ N
„ z rn z
o, w
N ~-'
z
0
~ ~ ~
r r r r r ~ 1.n r '~..$ W
ODO o rnO
to v
~ r
~
b
w
~ N N r C'1 W G7 00 ~ W f7 W G7 ~I v~ N N C1 W 47
N W O N O
I ~O p ~ r ~-' O v 70 N O W N O
v O In
a "~
~O r ~D W cs. O~ a is ~ r W O. ~I a a O ~O W O (D N t~
(p r C7 N N d ~ ~
O C+7 ~ ~
W W W
W N ~''
~ W W
O~ Od 6~ W 00 Gi
O p~ N
r v
C d d d H C7 d d H d C" d d ~ H
rt r• r• f+• r+• ~' r+• r• r• r• r• r• r• p~ r•
r • ~-S ri rt rt r • n H rt rt O' ~-S M G rt
~ m m co r ~ ~ co ~o r w ce n~ ~o ~ w r w
r• A A A fD r rh (1 C1 fD ~O A W f1 A G OG fD v
rt rt rt n ~n C] rr rr rn C] r"r ri rr rr "C fD v f]
~C O O O ~ O O O
r
O ~C O O b
rt
N
~ n n r ~-„ n n o rt n o
rt ~
C O n
r•O O O ~ M
'M MR
rS rh Fh M ~~ ~ ~
A 'sJ ~ x N (D CrJ b O b A G7 7o G o0
rt~• w G rn t7 ~~ rn d w rr m cu rr o~ d
0 o a 9 w rroo w o n o o w m rn
n ro W w r N• a r T.' n tD r-~ n v
m M
~
• ~ ~ b
~ ~ z m r
o ~ rr
m co ~ n n oa .~ rr m ~'
q m W G r• r x! Cl] W 'i ~O
rr o rnm A G ~r~ m co R w rnr~l
G ~ Qp ~O f7 K (D fY r
h..~ rt r r rS C r• O
G A O r• a O
M (D W (~ fA O
O cn f7 fD fA U1
~
~ ~ ~ r• m fD
N O to N O
~ w~ o ~ a o~
n ~
r • N ~' fD
G
H r
O
G R (D
A
~ ~ A ~ ~
~ Do O O~ 47 r• to G~
R lJ7 V A ~O
(D l~ r G1 h-'
• N
N
~ ~ ~
~ o
ox x x
o ~ W
r N f...
~ In W
r H 00 H O~ H
~ ~ V
v ~ r
~ ~ ~
~
o ~ ~ x d w c._, ~ t~ ~d d o c. 'd r G') ~ ~ d c,
n ~• w G m ~ ~• a~ ~o o w r• ~ co w ~ rn
r• a a 9 r ~t OG W r r't a• G P~ G N
r w w m w ~o ~• o w x n cu ~ w w
r• G OC a rS G a r't m W ''S OQ ~S
n A fD rt R+ N r• rt n W C+7 tD n
N fD N O ~ 'i 00 fD 00 rt (D fD In
O m G In ~ fD r• ~ G r 7C ~ CA W G G 00 7C
rt 0 rt In cn G N n l~ fD fD rt rt rt to
G ~ A 00 O v A 'S fD ~
H ~'•I G G H C H
G n N r• N r• a s
M fD ~ W A y M
O ~ W pp ~ rt fD 41 0 ~
r•t r ~O r • to (D rt ~!
~ oor wt-' o ~ B or
p~ r lI7 ~ U1 W O
R DD ~"' ~ R r
r,, fD r•
O ~ ~
G
~ ~n ~
~ Do ~ ~ ~
rr N 1~ rr v
fD A
~ ~
~
V~ 1.1~ ~
~ r ~O
~z ooz wz
O r l./t
~O ao r
0 0
0
t~ v, tlf v, c~ v,
r r r r ~ l1~ r r r ~ W r r r r r ~ O
b ~O OO b viO
w oo ~n
p~ N ~
i
r
I
W W O
I Vt ~•U ~ N O
I W ~ O
I - ~'
a
N W ~ OD a are O N fD D` a ~ V (D ~
~ CTJ Crl
W W W
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
V ~ N
p Vy V bci O~ W
O O~ W
r N r
a a y ad y ~ y
v~ m r• cn ~• r• ? r.
(A .`~ Ul ft fA rj K N• R
fl) -••• w r• r A cn r• (D r ~ fD r ~
fD w G m fD 0o fD m (~ (D In M N W
H rt w rr r (~ n rt rr ao f1 O~ (7
C w oo w ~ C w o v, a ~
-'• «~ N G V r• G K ~ m i""
A rY ~ I7 f7 fY fA
N N (D O ~•
y
R
G
Q'~ G ~ G [=i V w ~
p V)~ Wd G n Od ~ Vd
d rr N rt ~n n O o rt O~
(D ~ ri ~ f... ~ G r N
C C O n
•
•
O ~ (D
~ V~ ~ f) ~ ~ ~
b r• to r• O r• Oo O ~++
~ p p to [=1 p d r CrJ G Oo C=f
N r• r• In r• (D ~ E ~
O y y ~ m C V N ~
ft R ff rt (D w
rt ri 't r+ r.•
R R Vl ('t b ~ •~ ~
O O r O~ ~ - V
rS rt 00 K] rS fD W ''rJ to O 'z7
r G V~ O
M O 00 O tY r a ~-'
O M M r'~'
n rt
O W ~ O G 00
~ o c~ w ~+ c~ co ~-- c~
G ~
G N ~ V
G
r•
rr
~
~
~
~
~ r ~D
~x oox wx
O r l1~
~p Oo r
~ ~ ~
to W O
V H O H l!~ H
W 00 l1~
p~ N ~
~ ~ Vt
V ~ ~-"
CJ ~ d r~ x CrJ d ~ W CJ d w <-.~
O w (~ w G l) fD O O (tr r
o ~ ~
~ ~ w w w ~ a w ~ w
C G QG ri G rS O ~•! O rS
fD .7 (D rt C ~ rt .'3 K
N N• ~ ~ In Cn r• r• ~ In E ~ ~
o rr co m oo co n n r~ ~ m ~ w
b ~C ~ ~ ~ 7~ n co p v qC w ~ 0 7C
~ R rt N C (n d rt W i--• rt W
(D Cn W r • (D O~ rr N
O (D CA () C O•
rt n (D fD fD -
C rt to 1--~ to
r• C vi O ~ ~
n r• ~ b V a ~
~ ~ .or ~ rr rt ~r
cn N oo fD w n O
m rn o 0 0 ~
~ rt ~
."'j
O~ 1.J7 ~' l!1
~ rte. ~ r~ V .~.
~ N W
~O W O~
O~ In In
N ~D V
~ z ~ z r z
00 0o w
v, rn o
z z z
0 0 0
tji rn t~ rn ~ ~
r O ~ ~ r r ~ r-~ r ~ 00
~++ O b ~ O ~ O
• N ~ N
tv ~D W
i
r
U'i
n v~ c~ n ~ c~
a. ~a a a.
I oa ~ ~ a °a ~ a °Da a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ w w W
o ~ ~ ~'
~ ~ v, 1~
v
~ trJ 1~
~ W r
0o W ~O
w W
W O ~-' Vt
~ ~ ~ --
y y C7 y y
h,, r• p r• r•
Pt f7 G rt fY
r to r+ ~n O r+ vi ~--~ V+
N Oo ~ ~ ~ "
~
~ ~ n ~ O n (
1
N W ~ ~
W O~ a N ~
rt
R
O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ d r+ d ~ ~ d ~ d
00 W `C O i"''
~ O ~ ~
O~ ~ ~ In
r• 00 ~.n W
~ ~ W ~ ~ ~
~ N
~ W O~ N
Q` ~ ~ ~
~O "+7 ~O 'rJ ~--~ ''r1 ~ "y
Oo 0o W O
In O~ O ~
O~ O~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ G]
l~ G7
t,n G7 v G7
N ~ N W
N ~D W ~
~ ~ ~ ~
c V
°rx ox x F-x
w o0 0o w
~ ~ ~ O
O~ O~ O~ ~
v ~
~I H Vt H ~ H ~ H
A N ~ N
00 N ~ W
O~ O~ ~ ~
~p O~ N ~
fD ~ fD W O fD aD fD 00
N ~n G b v~ 4`
w w a m w
n n rr n n
ff rt ~ f7
rt
fD ~--~ fD v a
x
~ r
t ~ ~ 7C 7 ~ 7C
R W rT .~ R rt N R ~
lJl OD O N ~O
rj
O
f0
v O~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
c r ~ r r r
,-. ~ w o0
~ N ~ ~
v v ~ ~
~O W ~ N
N ~n Oo N
~ v o~ o~
Q~ N ~p O~
viz ~z ~z ~z
~„ ~ ~ w
~p ~ N lJl
O O O O
~O o~O ~O ~O
N ~O W ~
~I N ~ ~
i
I
H
O
rt
w
r
n
r-~
w
r•
M
r•
(D
a
'v
O
m
r•
rt
r•
O
G
m
DD
~--~
~-. n c~ c~ n o~ c~ n v. c~
° (
a ~ I ~9 d m ia d
c
o N d ro r
N C+] ~D LTJ W C+7
~ ~ ~
W N ~--'
~ ~ In
O~ N ~
~-~• W ~O Od ~O bd
W 00 OO
~ In O~
e] H H H
O r• r• r'•
G rt R rt
G ~--~ a, ~ a, r a,
rt fD V fD ~ tD ~-'
,'~ pp N ~O
a
r•
~
rn
rn
o~
r. .c ` ~
~ ~
d d
rt ~ W OD
'S N ~ ~
w
rt
0
n V o~ rn
r V ~
t-' L=J V Cr1 Vl C17
W ~ N
~ 0o N
V O~ ~
N ~
~p 'T1 ~ .jy f••' Ky
t•-~ ~ W
~ N ~
V v rn
o~ G] ~--• G~ V 47
~O W ~
N V~ 00
V V O~
O+ N ~
v~ x ~ ac ~ ~
~ r A
~p ~ N
V V V
00 ~ ~•"•
~ H O~ H r H
N ~D W
V N ~
Oo V V
O O~ N
C~ d w ~-+ d v~ ~-. d ~C ~-.
O !D Oo fD In fD ~
G v ~ ~
a w w w
rt ~t M rt
~
~ oo ~ v ~ V
~ ~ ~
a a w x a x x
rt .~ rt N rt \O
r• 00 ~! N
r•
rt o0 0o v
rt ~ O ~
w ~r wr v~r
rt o 00 ~
O ~ v ~p
n
00 00 V
~ ~ w ~ l~ ~
O~ ~ N
O~ OD v
00 00 OD
~ °
a z z wz
N O OD
V V ~!
O O O
L17 ~o [=J Oo [=7 00
b V O ~ O w 0
pp p~ ~
~ rn o0
~D ~O N r ~O OD 00 N r ~O ~D ~O CJ
O O N r 0 lJi W S W In In ll~ O
Oo O+ ~ O~ Vt O O O V7 O r N ~
y
O
R
w
r
O~
O
N
d CJ C'1 n f'1 (7 cn r-] C7 td W W H
(p ~' ~' ~• r 0 ? rf O O O O H
•b r• r• r• (D ~ fD fD ~ w w w I
y
G fD fD fD rt ~ 't w ~ n n n t"
rt rnrnrnT.'O r•m r•R.G.G. CrJ
a
m
G
~
-t
~ Ci n
h ~
C7 C7 C~ O E r
~•w
•
~'
w n o
~
~•vbb
fD G G G rt r O~ fD ~•
T.' ~C `C ~C fD O' rS r4 C] B
m a• w
o C7 y CJ f7 rn o w a
h-h r ~"t O ~ • M ~'
~ma~a ~+
~
w
i~ ~ • G rt 7
r T.' c
y r•t G cn r+• O fD G
p f) O "1 f0 rt r'1
rt G rn tD r • G ~
r• n O (7 N fD
r rt ("1 O O ~C C
r+• (D G fD
~ n n n n ~
rt
A N
G G O
H ^t N • I-h
(y rt rt
~ rt
ro ro H ~ c7 ~
w w o r• o m
rS rt rt tfi G
rt rt w r+• n :rJ
~' f 0 `~ e
H H a
H
1 o ro ~
1 m O G
n r+• to fD
C: r rt N•
p w r• rt
A cn O r•
r to a O
w r• m G
f11 Fil • • CA
v~ r
r• (D
r„ a z
r•
~
ro C
a
o
N ~
~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W r r p7
ray N. Cll
O rt 'd
u, r
r• O
rt p
r• m
O
G
r
N N N r r r r r N N N C~ O~ O~ ~ A ~~
W W N ~D 00 O~ Q~ O~ 00 W ~ W N O ~ ~ ~! ~D ~O OD 9
~ r
N 00 1~ ~ W O~ N ~ l~ O r ~O In 6~ O r In Vt Go 00 00 00 Ri
r r lJ~ lJ~ ~ W v O O ~ O~ W l~ 0o O In O O v ~I v 0o i-C
ro
a
H
H
H
I
C
z
C'1
r
'~
H
'~7
H
r~
d
ro
0
H
y
H
O
z
CJ
r
~ ~
G cn
r H
~C 'rJ
H
r (•~
a
H
r H
o z
ro
r
a
z
M
O O 0 N O
Oo V O~ l
jl .
P Ca
1
S=~ S 'S 3r S S 9 S i a S 3~ S 3 9 S 3~ S Z a
r r O ~ T b V W
V+ aG O
+ +
V9 b - N~ OD C
+ J- m .i- OD ~A V 1
+ .A V W O•
O~ .A V W OD O ~'• a b m N .i O~ ~ W ~A w to 1-+ V OD _
b N W a
~ T T
W V O V+ W O O r T V O ,A C• b N V -+ W V V `-+
O• O+ ~D m .A T m a O~ b .i- W O~ .A W W O~ O 1.7. b N V O+ •A
1-+ r r r
O
lJ~ 10 ~G V9 b .A 1!9 1D m Jf m W .A m OD ~P V W rA V t
G A V t~9
b m 1J~ r O V O~ iJl N Q' . OD ~O • .A ~P -+ N
~ ~O b r m N O• .- v W V ~ r+ W ~ N .P C tr T X 0 0 O
~
.P r Gr b In to m N m b O O N b m 0. m N r+ V+ b O• O b
N W ~P V N'~ m W .O Q+ ~i- b i.19 W b W to Cn • N ~i- m ~" T m w
r r r r r
_ _ _ O
1J1 O N to b P tJ'1 b r t/7 m~ A m ~
" • A m C+ ~A V ~-' .P V V
N m V b N .a • m 0 .A O • O N O• O~ • N N n
b W r p. .Y V W m 0 r .P b m N .- P r W A W to r V m
.OP to b W V O to W O O -•• O+ V O A ~ b W C` V r pb. W V
m O m O~ O~ b m .p O~ m A T b A W O• ~A W W C+ O i,A b N
r r r r r
N W W
l9
O~ O 1 1J7 b b N b A tJl b m .~ m A m m A V A V b
J- m b m i.I1 r O V O+ 1J• N O. m b ~A Ji D
O b m V b b .P -+ m N C+ ~A b W V V -+ W 1/1 N ~A W V+ T
~.+ . O
A~
D A W~~ 0
~
A b m
N N
m m
b
a N W T D
V N C t
0 i•
i ~ 1
7'1 ~-
P
+
r r r r r r
_ O O b
Q~ O m N1 O N to b O• Cn b r t!1 m C
+ .•
1-- m F ,~. m T +
IA• V ~
V b N m V b N ~/- m 0 df O O N O+ C~ R1
N
,P O~ W r N .~ V ~ m 0 G •4- b ~ N •P N r W O W to C
O O
O Q+ O
ovo ,A 1J1 b
mom W V O
o~ O•b 1.I9 W O
m+e• ' O r O~
'm ,tai V O .e
b Aw Q~ b W
o~.a w O~ V r
wo+o G
~
.e
r
r W r
r N r
r -..
r r
O r
O
b
b
70
O+ r N Q. O U9 U9 b b t/l b .P Vl b m IA m w •a m OD .p V T
~ i
O r .P m b m N9 r O V O~ to N O+ Oo N •*! H
W ~+ m O b m V b b A r m N p~ ~A b W V V r W tJl N W RJ
1.J• N. A N O b .1- r W b N9 to m N m b 0 0 N b m T m W H
O ~P O A b b N W •A V V1 m W A O~ IA b 1!1 W b m I.R Vf W s
r r r r r
r W r
r N ~+ N r
r r O O b
O+ r i.l9 p~ O m IJ7 O N iA b 1T H~ b r t/~ m O~ It m r A m p. N
N .A V b N m V b N A m 0 .P O O N O
~ m 0 •~ O~
N O W r N A V ~ m 0 G A b A N A N -•` W O C
O ,> m O
O O+ O .A Cn b W V O Y9 W O O r p. V O ~A O~ b W
O O O O V O m O m P O. b m A O~ m .A O• b A W T ~P W C
C
r r r r r r r i
~.+ W r w r N r r O O b t•'
O+ r m O• r N O~ O In N~ b b f.Il b A to b m .~ m W .p. m OD Cf]
1.19 V
V O~ b . O r
r m •A m
O
b m b m
b b V+ r
a r m O V
N O• .- C• 1.R
v W V N T
~ r W .'T
Z
~ Jl e 1
P m 0 m
m I.
+ N O •~ O A b b N W .P V V~ m ai ~P Q•
t 0 Vf
•A 1 W b s
' r
r O
r .A r w r N r N r f
-• O AO
P m 1N• P N .i P V b ~ N m N V b ~ N ~- W m 0 A A O -+ H
W a V ~ m 0 N
A O~ W r N ,~ V ~ m 0 C a b ~ N i- R!
N~ m m O .~ m O
O O~ O O
J- IJ9 ~p W V O 1/9 W O O r O+ V O ,~.
V+ N a O O O O V O m O m O~ O• b m ~P O• m ~p O~ b ~A W C
C
-+
~.+ ,P r
r w r
r W r
r N r
r r
r r
O r
O Z
b
V N lA O~ r m O~ r N O• O Cn tJ9 b b i71 b J- CH b m A m W lT7
~ V
G A w . tr V
O~ b O r
a r m .> m
b m b m
e b b iJ9 r
m o--. m O V
N O• .A Q• N+
V W V V D
O+ J- W J
N O~ W
N~ 1J9 .p- ~
N O b
A r N~
b iJ+ VI
m N m
b 0 0 O
C
~- 1J1 ~-' m r N O .p O ~A b b N W ~P V V9 m W .rs O~ .o b N~ H
H
r+
r r~ r
r .p r
r W ~...
r N r
r N r
r r
r ~.+
O p
V N b
a O• r _N
m P r i.n p~ O m
~ In O N
r
N 1J. b V•
A u+ b r to m Q.
~ 2
r .
i m m .
P V ~ m O N
~ b C
if V
P W O O ~-+ J. ~ a
V
V O V W
N~ m m F+
O .A m O
O P O O
d- U9 b N
W V O 1J9
Ln W O O
O ~' P ^A
M
W V m Vf N ~P O O O O V O m O m O~ O. b m A 0• m .P O• ~
r r r r+ 1-• r r r A
V N W V N t/. O~ r m V r N O• O 1J~ C71 b b 1l~ b .P 1,/. b OD 2
V O
W 1,n N r .V
O .P W to V
C` T b O r
w r m .1- m
O b m b m
V b b u+ r
.A r m O V
N Q~ .i [^ y
V+
O. r 0 O
Q. ~A W V
N Q• W W
Cn N. Js y.
N O b p. •
~i- r (/~ OD
b t,n to N
m N m
m m .a .P N9 r m N. N O .P O .A b b N W ~P V tr m W .i- T
r r r r+ -+ ~.+ ~..+ r+
V W O~ V N b T 1-+ N m r t,I• O~ O m (,I~ O N v+ b P t7• b -"'
O V J- N CO r N .A V ~O N m V b N .P =
Gn T U9 h+ a m m .p V N~ m 0 N .p O~ b W F+ O~ ~P V W m 0
W•
o. N w V
V o w W
v+ m eo r•
o .a co O
0 0. o O•
a v. .o N
w V o N9
v+ w o
N m 0 W V m V+ N .i O O O O V O m O m T O~ b C7 ~A O~
t-• r+ r 1-+ -+ r 1-+ F+
1--. Q~
V W O F.• 1.19
V N W F•. a
49
V N r W
V --` m -+ W
T 1-+ N M+ N
O~ O tJ+ r
t!1 ~p ~G t+
V9 tp .A
_ _
~ S
V OD V W Cfl N O A W O+ T ~O m
W O ~O m V ~p b A -+ O
N c~9 O V 1J. tf+ O~ pD
.N ~O 1-+
O+ .A V C~ 1--+ O
m O .A O+ .A W
- .A In ~-+ N O• W
OD -+ N f.l's tJ• ~A.
O .A. O N O ~O
~P ~C •O .A 1-+ V+
N W .e ~p 1J'1 (J.
V Cn m
r M+ N p.. r ~... r --.
V W .i-
V cf+ V W T
O V V N ~C
~A N O• '-` N
OD 1-+ Q• Y-. N~
N .A O+ O W
V b N9 O N
N m CI1 ~O Q•
V lp
O
~O r ~O V9 T CJ9 r ,p OD W X11 V i,n m O N a O~ ~O W 1--• G` iA V
W N9 O W
O~ N W V
V O V W
N• OD Oa /-+
O .is CD O
O O~ O O
~P N. b N
W V O
O b .A. N OD O W V m ti+ N ,i+. O O O O V O m 0 01 T O• ~G
"~~
.s
C
i
r
ao
H
M
v
1••1
C
v
N
D
C
~~+
N
H
r
K
70
H
'A
O
C
Z
v
['9
v
C
y
~!
O
"l!
tT7
}aV
H
A
Z
~- 7
y
t`+t
Vbf
7
C/!
O
._
O
C
O
Cff
N
90
A
S
D
GC"
rn
O
C
H
K
'y
O
O
~e
P7
s
v
en
r
r t-• r r r ~-+ O
V Q+ u+ ~A w N r O tO
s s a s s a s s a s s a x s a x a s ' x s a s 3 a s a a
r r r
r
0~ m O ~P N V w~
~V N a OW O N r 1V+ 1N0
r 0 W V 0 0 O 10 .~
-+ r r
-•` CD r V r p.
~ .P t~0 m V ~ ~ O V
~ 10 10 r O+ iA ~ ~n p
N b m A 0 N 100 10 V
r -+ ~..
-~+ 10 r 0 ~ V
~ CD V~ 0 1~•• A ~ .AA 0
~ V W N N 0 WO O N
W 10 N -+ 0 W V 0 p
~+ 1~O r O~D r V
10 N N m~~ m V~
W V 10 ~0 10 10 N~ Q~ ~
t0 ~P V N ~0 V v. -+ r
W 0 .- N t0 0 A 0 N
N r r
10 ~ O ~ m tpi~ ~ -W+ .~-
o-0+ V O~ ~ V W ~V N O~
0 r 0 O V J- ~ r+ ~-+
W V O~ W 10 N F+ 0 W
N --• f..
0 0 0 ~ N N ~ A b
~ OD O+ m V 1O .N 10 10
CD O N 10 ~- V N 10 V
0 iJ~ O W 0 ~- N 10 0
_ N N h+
~ tVJ+ O ~ P O :~ m tOi+
~ O Cn ~ V Cn T V W
~O V~ W oD r o o V~
N W A W V O~ W 10 N
_ N N v
O 10 W ~ 0 0 A N N
~ .~ r ~ 0 01 m V 10
r W C7~ 0 CD N a0 •~ V
V O ~- OD IJ~ O W m .-
~.+ -+ N -+ ~.+ ~ r O
O W cOn O aVS+ O ~~ O
C 0 0 ~ O 01 10•• V O~
~/- O V 10 ~ W 0 -~+ O
N 01 ~A N W ~- W V 0
1+ M+ N V r~ r p
~ COD O ~ 1VO W .~ O O
OD ~f- 0 W A r 0 0 p.
100 O r ~ W N~ CAD OD N
W~ to V O .~ 0 t.n p
1.+ r W -+ r N -+ 1•+ FN+
r N~ C W CA C tJ+ O
r ~O'~O O~ 0 O~ O O O+
rP 10 to .OA O V b lJ+ W
.- 0~ N~ N O~ ~P N W ~-
r r W r '... N r r ~N..
r V W 0 0 0 C 1C w
nA+ CD 0 T A 0 W .A r
N N V7 ~0 O r `~+ W V+
W n-' N W r v+ V O .~
r N ~A r r W r r N
-+ O W r. 1p r 0 0 0
N r N V7 W N~
~ O+ V W a0 10 O CD p.
r .A ~i .P ~0 [!1 .A O V
r O~ 10 ~Ar O~ V7 N 0 .i-
N N _ N
~•+ O aA0 1--t ~ V O CD pN.
V N V W aD O
~ V t./7 1A-~ m QD 0 A aD
W r .y- N N In a00 O r
A W 0 0 r N W r v7
r N tNJ+ 1--• N ~P r r W
N ~--• to r O W r 10 r
N W N r•+ . N
N V W O+ p. V r ~0 ~
V - v0 w
V+ V ,A r ,p .P .A .O V7
V 10 Cn r O~ 10 .A O~ V7
r tri+
v w o~
Cn T tVi7
W
01 N W
N 0 O
r ~
V W O
N CWD V
Cn ~ V
~-.
V W BOA
10 IV+ ~
f+ .
O tN0 ~
-+
O O V
~ tJ~ O
r
O 0 V7
10 10 V
r
m .- N
G O N
V 0 O
r
OD .r- V
iJ~ a A
J-0 N
0 ~ r
f+ A
~V N CN
~ a`rD w
F+ OD
~ r ~
r 10 10
N 1b0 m
~ ~0
10 {!~ O
~' V W
0~
W 1V0 N
r
O N N
m V 10
~ m A
N
-+ O
a0 O• O
O+ V ~
~+ .
0 r O
W V Q~
r O
~0 V 1d7
0 m O~
~ .
CD V07 O
N
r r r
O V O
~ O 0
N W A
N
r r r
O V N'1
W ~ r
iJ+
r W [./7
V O .A
r r N
O 0 O
0 m O+
.P O V
N p~ .i
r ,rp
V ~ N
1~ ~A 0
V
CV.7 V m
r ~
V V O
W V7 N
Cn -" O
mooA
~..
r tr
V O V
w O N
N 0 O
r a
V ~ ~
V 0 V
r 10 a+
O~ .P V
r
r
V V tAn
10 -•+ 10
r
O 10 S
r
r p.
-°D o v
F+ Cn O
r
t0 10 V
-- v
aD ~ m
~ O N
V 0 O
f+
0 V -V+
-~.. 01 A
JOi CD N
-~+
m ~ .-
V N O~
N
~- ~•+ r
-+ 0 W
r m
.0 A 1~0
~ 10 a0
N LO V
N 10 0
r .0
10 CD iJ1
r V W
W 10 N
F+
r
•0 N N
W0 V 10
~0 ~P V
W CD .p.
r p
~O 0 O
0 V O~
~-.
407 V T
r p
a0 V V7
O O
O~ 0 0
V+
CC W N
aD i.n O
N
r r r
O V O
i./7 O
O O T
~p
~O to w
N W ~A
r r
r .P r W
O+ r _N Q+ r (J7
0 .A V V7 0 O
w r
V7 CD 0 O ~A 0
iJ~ N ~P O O O
r r
r A r W
V N fJ7 O~ r 0
O :A W V O~ 10
O+ .A W N Q1 W
~A Cn r 0 r N
a. r...
r .A r ,p
V N 10 Cn r N
V O V tWi+ 0 CD
W V CD iJ~ N ~A
~+ r
V V ~ V
t~ ~ N OO ~A. W
Q~ r O O~ ~P W
aD m .p. gyp. to r
r f+
r t!1 r A
V W Q~ V N 10
W ~ VV+ v .AP. m
O N W V O V
N 0 O W V 0
r r
V Cri7 O V N W
~V CWD V ~ W N
~A 10 r O~ -+ O
O+ ~P V 0 0 A
r+ ~...
vc~a~ vwa
r n~+ 1"''o w a cVi1
W tr O O~ N W
O 10 .P N 0 O
-~ r
0~ m V W O
~ ~ O N OD V
O OD {J7 .~ ap V
10 1G V CN J- V
-+ V -+ T
CD .p N V W ~P
O O N 10.• r .C
O r r W Cn O
V 0 O O 10 ~P
_ r r
0 A V CD ~A 0
G!~ OV+ .i. -+ tOA p
r f..
~O 0 N 100 100 V
r r
-•' OD F+ V
OD ~ ~•+ 0 A N
N N ~ WO O N
.A r r 0 h+ r
~"' 0 W V CD O
r
-+ O r V
0 ~ {.I'1 0 A V
~ 10 ~0 ~ ~ A
N 1p V p~ r r
N ~p CD .p CD N
r r
f+ 10 r 0
.0 to O 0 tJ+ r
~ m u+ r ,A
0 V w V N O~
O V J- ~ r r
W 10 N r 0 W
r r
r ~D r p~
~O 0 t,ff OD lf7 Cn
Wrn V 10 ~ 10 ~G
~0 .1s V N ~O V
W DD ~P N 10 OD
N r
r O r ~0
10 O~ O 10 Cn O
O V Q+ r V CU..7
r a.
W V ~ (O.i ~ N
r N
O~ O m
N ~ Q~
O
O V O
r W
Q1 r N
O r
W r 0
O ~ O
-..
F+ W
an r V+
~ CND O
O O O
~•+
r W
CIS ~•+ 0
V ~ 10
N O~ W
0 r N
r
O+ r N
~ ~ V
N'1 0 0
~J1 N ~P
r
V _N tAit
O :A W
~ tAi7 nW+
r
-.. ,s
V N ~0
r ,p 0
CVd V m
F+
V N W
~ VVi N
m 0 ~
r
V tr.7 OW+
W 01 V7
N CND O
r
V Crai O
N m V
~ ~ V
Ir O~
V W .A
a0 ~ b
r
O ~ .0P
_ ~
0 A OD
~+ i~ O
r
~0 10 V
r
r V
0 A N
O O N
V 0 O
r
r V
0 .A _V
[J'7 O~ A
r
O+ r r
.A CD N
r 0
0 tr r
r A
~V N 01
A ~--. r
r 0 w
r
r N
.~ N m
1p W r
O • i
CAD O m
r N
0 ~ m
iOJ~ 10 ~ DD
~0 ~ ~
~..
r N
O V t00
O ~ ~ n
O V O
r tr.7
O~ O ~N+
cwi, `~ •°D v
~ ~ A
O A O
r
r w
r
N A
~ 0 O M
O O O
r
r w
0 {.It V
V ~ 10 '*7
~ r N
a+
o-+ ,a
O, ~ rN..
W ~- V G9
0 OD 0
t77 N .p
f•+
V -.` V
O ~A W _
.0P ~ nW+
r ,p
V •NA N
r .p- 0
W V CVD ~
r {~j~
V N W
tw W N `
m 0 A
r u+
V O V
CJ'7 O~ Vr
w . 7C
N OD O
r ~
V fW ~
V m V
~~~..r
O• .i- V
F+ T
V W ~P
~ r •0 =
O 10 .OA
r
r
0 A m
r ~ O Z
O OD V+
10 10 V
r V
0 .1- N
.A Cp
W O N
O O
0 r r
V CD O
w
N
w
n
A
(D
a
G
I-+
n
O
;.7'
f?
W
"r~
r•.
a
V
a
v
en
N N .NP W N N N 1.+ r
O+ Vt N ~+ O ~O O~
S S i S 3 a S S A S 3 a S 3? S S 9 X 3 9 S Z A S S 7
N N
r N 0 h+ N T 1-+ _N 6Nn
W A ~ N W r N N W
N+ LJ1 O m .A O N V W
~ 0 V a00 r ~-+ 6Vn V A
O O N V+ 0 T V ~O Q~
F.+ N O r N V 1... N O+
W ~1- 0 W N J- N r r+
V .Oi .a o-N+ O O W O rV+
N i./f A r 0 .P N t0 0
.e A ,a m .. ,. a. ,o ~.
_ N N _ N
A O N W r Nf N W 1~+
~ W 0 CWit W O S A O
O r N ~P- Oo V ~p r r
V ~O O~ O ~p N tJ+ 0 O~
r N O r N 0 r N V
A N ~O ~ O t0lf W ~p OAD
~ A V V ~- rP B O O
O~ V r N ~,n .A r 0 ~1-
O V 0 A A ~O 0 A A
~-+ N o-W+ r N~ r N m
%~ ODD COi1 A OA+ C~J'1 W .WP V.
IOV O+ O~ ~ W 0 ~ i,e~ O
r W ~... O r N A 0 V
N .i- O V t0 Q~ O ~O N
r N r r N O r N m
~ ~ o-0.. ~ N b :~ O tmi+
N r N Gn J~ V 0 A A
W ~ JOi O V m .N- ~ ~
r N N r N FW+ r N ap
~ -'~' m A m W :~ C~ l~J~
~ to V N O~ O~ o-N- W 0
V O~ ~O r W r O r N
W V 0 N ~p- O V ~O O~
r N W r N r r N O
0 m 0 ~ tOJf r A N A
O W N N r N t,n ~~A77 V
O V N W o-0+ ~ O V 0
r N ~ r N N r N r
P 0 N {l1 V lJ~ ~- Cn O
~ -" V ~ 1./~ V N P T
O ~P ~p V O~ ~O r W r
V T T W V O~ N ~P O
r N {WA r N W r N IW~.
Q~ t0 O Q~ V .>
N V 0 0 ~ ton r
OD N N O W N N r N
N V 0 ~ 6n V .0P O O
O ~P T O V N W r ,p
1.+ N (J~ r N .a r N N
V ~O ~D O~ OD N V+ V cn
b N {.A r r
V A 0 ~ r V O+ cn V
W O N O ~- A V Q~ a0
N N O~ V O~ O~ W V 0
r W~ o-+ N VWi r N tW.i
V O N ~ N V O+ m O
V 0 O~ O~ N N O W N
~ 0 6I~ N V 0 ~ to V
r OD r O .a C+ O V N
/--~ W V r N iJ~ r N~
Oo r V V ~G ~O O~ OD N
r W ~P N A m ~- r V
~ V V W O N p ,p .la
~O W V~ N N T V Q~ O~
W W
-+ W m ~-+ W Q+ -+ N N+
m N O~ V O OD p~ ~p O
N C+ T N . N
CJ~ N V V OD Q+ m N N
O W 0 IJ9 m 6!'1 N V OD
W N W r 0 r O ~A O~
~ W ~p ~-+ W V ~-+ N ~
~G WO r 0 -+ V V ~G ~p
OA O O ~ W .if N .P OD
W t0 0 O V V W O N
V -~' O ~O W t!f N N O~
~' N .0
r tp ~'
O T V
~O .
~~~
N
r O ~G
m V lJ+
W r .P
.a+ W ao
r N 6!~
N r N~
~vcWi
V tVp T
N
N o-N+ r0+
m O MV.`
oN. ~ .~..
r N O~
N N OD
m ~ O
~ m Or+
r N V
W N .A
~ O O
m .~ aAP
r N 0
W W r
t~.a ~ O
O ~ N
N
W ~A OD
V A d-
~ ~ b
r N ~O
~P a ~
N W 0
r,.
V b ~
r N O
~- to N
~ ~ V
a V !-+
O V OD
r N r
.1- N+ O
N ~ O
N .W- O
_ W
iJ1 ~ m
N ~ N
~ O O
W r ,A.
r N N
W V to
O~ Cn V
O+
W V OD
r N W
O V .P
O (0.7 N
Cn .
~O Cn V
O V N
"' N ~A
O~ m N
.A -~+ V
CA
V T Q+
N
r r W
r ~O r
r ~C ~p
W
.a ~ ~,~.
~A T {.19
F~+ 1--~ fiNi
r ~O V
V W
,p oe ~
r
Oi -.' N
N
r O W
.•°o a v
~ a b
r N ~
r V N
m V Vt
w r ,o.
~A W 0
r N V~
N r to
N V iWi>
V ~ OA+
r N ON.
N r o-+
V~ O -V~+
0
~ ~ ~
N
N ~
m ~- O
tO/~ 0 O~
r N V
W b m
N O O
m ~ ~
r N m
W W r
.1- {~
t!~ N'~ O
W
O ~O N
N
W ~ m
V A ~
A ~ O
-+ N ~
A OA+ C~i~
N W 0
r
V ~O a
r N p
~P N ~
a A V
C~ V r
O V 0
r N ~W.
~A m lO.s
~O O~ p+
N
r W o-+
N .A O
1--~ N 1W.
to T 0
Ut 1--~
N r N
~O
W O ~
1-+ N N
Cn V N~
i--~
T Ln V
V O~ ~C
W V pD
r r N 1-+ r 1.N+
0 0 0 O V O
C~ 0 O~ O O T
.1s O V ~ cJ+ W
N C+ .i- N W ~A
r r N r r~
O OD Q+ O V V~
OD .i OD W .if fW.
~p O r ~ W N+
W r cn V O Ja
r r W r r N
w.NO~ omo~+
~P ~O N'~ .o O V
r r W r r N
r ~O V O W O~
lA+ m m ~ ~ m
NNtn ~co..
0 r N W r N+
r N ~A r r w
~' O W H ~ r
~ ~ V r b b
~+ ~P .P ~ tC to
r T ~O .1- C~ tr
N N
r N ~A r r W
~' O ~O r ~C V
m V ~ ~ OVD m
W r .~ N N Cn
.P W GD 0 r N
r N ~ r N .NP
N r V7 o-+ O W
V V W ~ Q~ V
V~ V .1- r .0. A
V ~O T r O~ ~p
r N O~ r N .Ni
N r r r 0 ~D
~ O r ~ V tNi~
N t0 0 W r A
O~ ~O r .p W 0
r N O~ r N tNi+
N N OD N r 4n
m A O v V W
~ 0 O v ~O T
r N V r N a
W N .A N ~--~ r
~ O O ~ O ~
-" O ~A N ~G 0
OD ~p .~ O~ ~O r
r N m o-+ N ON+
W W r N N 0
Cn VA'i O 0 .WP O
~ 0 V ~ r r
O ~O N CA 0 O.
r N OD r N V
W A 0 W N A
V ~ .NA ~N+ O O
N v+ A r O A
~P .P b 0 A A
r N ~ r N pNp
~- .A. V7 W W r
N W m [!~ C,l7 O
r
O r N .Wp 07 V
V ~O Q~ O ~D N
~--' N O ~.+ N m
.A N~ N W .A OD
T .NA V 0 A .WA
4+ V -~` N to A
O V OD ~i- A ~p
r N ~' r N ~
.is Cn O Ji .A Cn
~O O• Q~ N W m
N - r+
r+ W ~--. O r N
N .i O V ~G O~
r O
~O p+ O
O V O+
r
w~~
N
~O V IOJ+
OD m ~
{Jf
OD i01+ O
N
O V O
o a°+
N W ~
r r rN-~
O V N9
W ~A nW+
u+
V O ~
N
O m O
O ~ O
N ~ ~
r r N
O pD Q+
0 ~ m
O+
W ~0+ CIS
r r W
~ N C/~
Crd ~O ~O
~ ~ ~
_ N
r ~C V
J- m m
r
N N N
OD r N
N
r N A
r N r
O+ C~ V
r a ~
~"' O ~O
~ V to
.WA W OAD
r N tr
N r V~
V V CW-7
V b OA+
r N O~
N -+ r
i.n O r
0
ON+ ~ r
_ N
N N 0
OD ~A O
OD .
~o `-+ o--.
lf~ m O~
r N V
W N .A
N O O
_r
CD A A
•-' N OD
W W ~
~+'~ Cn O
O ~ N
r ~C
.~ OD CJ's
r V W
O V ~A ~
W ~O N
r ~
O N N
~ V ~O O
W OD ~P
„'. O
.~ O~ O
~ V O n
GO.f V T
r p
O O O
0 O O~
m 0 N °
Oi N~ O
_ N
C W O
O O Q~.
~O Rf
N W A
N
r r -..
O ~ ~
~ ~P r ~+!
V O ~
N
r r N
O ~ COJ-
O m O~ G9
N a .-
N
r r N
G m O
T ~ m S
W ~O" CR
N
r r W
r ~O r
N V~
r ~C ~C
o-y
A a t~i~
N
r r W
.y V W
~A+ m 0 `
0 r" N
r N r
r O W
N r
~ O V ~
r ~ ~
r N .if
.~ V N
m v 6H !"n
.WA W m
r N tNn
N N W
V V ~ S
V O O+
N
r N O•
N --` r
OD V
t!~ O r
0 Z
N ~G pD
Q. ~p ~-+
N
r N T
N N m
W r
0 =A O O
~p r r
Cn OD O+
w
F-'
r{
n
tD
a
c
r
/\
n
0
rt
."~
C
a
i
v
re
W w w w
to ~P W N 1W-~ O b OD V
S Z i S Z i Z = i S ,,= i Y Z i S Z 9 = 3 i S 3 i S 3 i
N W W r W~ r W ~
~ W V b T b b 0 ~O+
~ ~O ~-' ~ V+ r ~ O O
Cn N O to b .A W b b
V Q~ O• b T V V r 0
N W .~ N W N r W 0
r V V O to O~ b W O~
N O N ~ N -W.' ~ W a0..
O N m i.19 O~ N b .A 1-+
C• .~ to m ~+ V m A b
N W tAl~ N W W 1~. W V
N N V+ O W V :~ P b
N~ N p~ Cn N O N~ b ~-
to N .A V O~ O~ b O+ V
N W V N W~ N W N
N ~•' O ~ W~ O~ W
W P ~' N O N A N r
C V O O N m t~ O~ N
V O~ W O~ ~P i,/~ m -• V
N A m N W i.R N W W
W h+ ~- N N N .O W V
~ N V ~ ~+ A ~ b -+
V N .p 1.A N Q~ {~+ N
m b N tJ7 N ~P V O~ ~
N A b N W V N W ~
W~ W~ N b 0 •+ V V
N N FN~+ b O~ FO+ N O N
Q• Q~ ~+ O~ V O O N m
N~ O N V O~ W O• ~- N
N A O N ,~ m N W VAi
'a /N+ V~ w 10+ A N N N
W N .~ -+ N V O -+ J.
t~ b O V N .~ VAi N p~
N O N m b N N~ N A
_ W
m !W V
~.•' W .A
T V V
b W to
r w m
W N Q~
{Jf N V
b
W N W
~' W b
b W Q~
o° o
V hb+ O
b W ~
i!~ W ~0+
r
b ,o r
m A b
r W ~
b ~A N7
~ ~ r
b T V
A
O 4WR ~
A N -W+
b
m ~P+ V
A
O a a
~ b -V'.
V a 00+
r N twn
V ~ N
V ~A OD
W O N
N N O~
_ w
V 00+ N
O ~ O~
w
O .i N
it w ,a.
W
b W tai
~-+ W CWD
m N T
I.R N V
O W OD
W N W
-. w ~
b W O+
O r
O O O
V ~b+ O
F+ W O
b W O~
to W -0-.
r
ObD ~ trp
/•+ W -A+
~O ~ b
b V+ r
b O~ V
O~ m N Vri V UNi
.p. ~W+ V r OD
Cn T tJ9 V
O .A .A V O~ b
V Q. O~ W V OD
r N to r N W
Q+ b O O~ V rP
~ N N O W N
N V S tW0 VI ~7
O ,a O+ O V N
w w
~-' N V~ r N .o
V b b O~ O N
N ~A ~ .a -~~+ V
W O N O ~P Js
N N O~ V O~ C~
W
r W Q~ t+ N twi+
V O CD O~ b O
O~ N N
~ CD O~ QO+ N N
~ m i.n N V CO
-+ OD r p .0. O•
--• W V r N twi.
OD r V V b b
[a~.7 W A N .bA OND
4+ V V W O N
b W {.1'~ N N O~
~+ W m r W pW+
m N O~ V O m
~ N V V m ~
O W Q7 tOi~ CD N~
W N W r m -+
~' W b -+ W V
b W O~ m r V
O.A O O f~i.- W ,j
W b b O~ V V
V r O b W y~
-~' N r
~A t!+ O
b 00+ ~
_N .
N ~i O
r N r
tJ1 O• m
~ r
~ h+ N
.A O O
W -+ a.
~' N N
N V f.l'~
~ t/+ V
W V m
_ W
T m O
~ W N
O V N
r N ~A
T OD N
~A r V
V ~ a
r N V+
T b O
OD N N
N V m
O ~0- T
W
V tNp b
V ~ O
W O N
N N O~
N
r N ~p
A ~ ~
N W OD
r i
O r N
V b O+
r N O
~i tJ~ N
~ A V S
O V m
1-+ N FW..
~ m W
b C~ O•
~ 6N 1.+ A
N .P O
W
CJ~ T m
in r
N r N
w~~v
W
Vr~ V tNJ+
F+ m
T N V M
6Va7 V m
_ W
O~ m O
O W N
IJ~ ^7
O V N
-+ N ~
P O~ N
an r
cAi+ r V O
V Q+ ~
N .- -~+ N .- ~ N W V N W N N W N ~+ W O b+ W m -+ W OW+ -+ N VWi
A W O W f+ W N b O ~"" V V O to C~ b W O~ pp N O• V O OD T b O
~+ -+ F+ 111 r O W O+ i!- W m O N O~ C+ N N V
~ m m N N a+ b O~ f+ N p N ,p N h+ tI1 W r tr N V V m D+ m N N
N N V O~ P h+ O~ V O O N m t~,n O~ N ~ A H+ p (N ~ y0i m {,H N V m S
b W W H7 O N V O~ W P A S m 1.+ V m .~ b W N W -+ OD -+ O .i O~
N A W N ~. O N A m N W CAfl N W W F+ W N ~ W~ r W V r N iWl~
~ N m '~ ~~ W a r N m m O Q~ T b ,e tJ~ b W T Oe r V V b b
V7 W N W N .- r N A N~ W V • O~ b O F+ • A N . b N
N O A V ~ r ~p b b r b tr r O O O r W .A N rP Oo
O N'~ Q~ Vf b d! V N A /.R N O~ Vbi N O ~ b ~/- W b b OW+ V V W O N~
{.fl N7 ,p N O N m b N i/~ N ~P V O~ O• b O• V V r O b W N~ N N O~
W N A A
N .~ J~ N .p r N .1- b N W V N W .Ai N W N •+ W O -+ W m r W~
C• i.R ~P .P W _m W r W N b 0 1-+ V V O 6n O~
-+ .- b b OD m ~"~ ~ r O W p. ~ W b m O• CD N Q~ V O m
tJ~ ~,,,, 'V N r ~ O+ r N O N ~ N r ~ W r0+ E N V O OPD pN. C.r
iOJ~ .- m ~ W W IPn O N V ~ fa0a P ~ imJ~ ODD FP+ V b A -+ O W OD tJ+ OD Cn
Qf ~- b W N W ~+ OD r
to to W A
N .~ {./~ N .- W N .i. O N A m N W tAn N W W r W -A-. -+ W b r W V
O. Q~ V 6n .O. O ~A N [.R W O r N O~ Q! O Q~ O~ b .Y. Gl~ b W O~ C! r V
V ~P ~ Cn W N W N .i- ~-• N V O V A b b NV-` T b O r A N
b to r o 0 0 ~+ W .is
Ob+ V V O {J~ C~ IOn b to V N ~- {,/t N O~ {./f N O Cbn b ~A W b b a V V~
tJ+ W N N'1 t!f ~A N O N ib b N /./f N .p V O+ O+ b Q~ V V r O b W C/~
iJ~ f.n f.R J-
N ~A V N ~p ~i N iii. r N A b N W V N W .AA N W N f+ W O r W m
V P W O+ W O :p I.W+ 1~+ W pr.. (Wj~ !V 1b+ O :r GV.i a O ~ O~ b W O~ OD N O~
J. O O r .p b b OD OD ~V N r tr O~ r to O N J- N ~W+ V~ fa0i -0-. ~ N V r
~~ -+ ~ A m b W W {PFl T F+ T V O O N m b . r.
O N V T W T .P fJ+ V+ O~ N b .P r O W OD
m r V m A b W N W
W N ~ W A
N .f- OD N .P tf+ N .P W N .ia O N J- m N W H'1 N W W ~. W -A.. r W~
m V N P A tVJ .~ N m ~ r~ :V ~~ N N iml9 C W V .~ a b .~ O r
r O~ W V .i- O~ to W N W N .0 r N V O r ~A ~ b H.. ~ i~+ r ~ O O~
W b N O ~A. A
W O• O tr W N to to ,a N O N OD b N i./f N .p Cn N O ff~ b Js W b b
V O. Q• b p. V V -" O
tJ+ N+
N ~A. b N ~A V N .A ~ N ~A r N .A. b N W V N W .AA N W N r w p
m b OD V F W T tabi O ~~ m W `r.. (wig N r O .~ W T O N P b W T
m m P A O O r cif b b m m V N r IJ~ p. r (r O N ~A. N r ~ W~
b OD Cl+ ~ m ~+ m r O+ N N V O. O~ r Cb. V O N b r
V m m ~P V~ r to ~P O~ b W W Cn O N V T W T A tr Oo r V b A r z
W A ~p
N lJ~ -P+ N ,p m N ~ Cn ~A
b r ~O. C7 N .A V+ N ,1a W N .A O N J~ OD N W CAi+ N W W r W ~A..
N ~p OVD N T~ V to .p O .A N iJ+ :,.,) r .L1 N N m O P O+ b .f- V*
[l+ O b r O~ W W N O r . V+ . W V Q+ ~O
A w V .A C+ N'1 W N OW N ~p E N V O r ,p b ~O r b l.IY r
Fw•. O CJ+ W O~ O V1 W N H9 4• .A Cn b m V N A Cn N T CJ1 N O Cf~ b .O. O
N O N m b N V7 N .0 V O+ Q~ b Q~ V
w
1-~
rt
n
a
N
n
O
rt
a
...
9
v
en
•P W N ~ A W W W W
O ~G m V T
mss sss ssa xss mss x=a xsa xaa~ xss
~ a• a.
W V~ V W N+ A N~ t+
N O~ V F-• W ifs ~p F+ .A
A A V N N A
tJ~ ~/+ m O p~ N CJ~ O ~p
r O W O m N W OD Q.
W O O W Vf N F+ O N~
W V A ~W IJ1 r O N ~p
WO O~ N ~ -~+ ~ ~ m ~
CJ7 W O CA N N t•+ m ~p
C~ A tJ~ m V O~ V W A
W V~ ~ W ~ V W iJ~ ~
~ N W N~~ ~ V N
-+ V Vt N~ tJ~ m O O~ N
~ ~O V ~+ O~ W O m N
~O m ap W t0 O W CR N
W Q~ N W Vf ~O W Vf Q~
N~ O ip W V A F+ tJ'~ F+
O OV+ A W A N V -+ VWi
~ ~"' ~` W m O t~ N N
~G m tp 0+ A [n m V C~
W O~ ~Vp. W iJ~ FV+ W LA V
to N O~ A ~O F+ N O+ V
~O A N -•• V tWJt N~ 47 m
b W V~ ~ ~O V IVY. O~ W
~O O ~p ~O m ~G W ~O O
W O~ ~ W O~ N W {.If ~O
O~ W to N~ O ~O W V A
O b b tOi~ P~ ~ a N
V ~O ~O A -r ~-+ in O O
V ~O r ~O m ~O Q~ A V7
W O~ m W O• ~P W N- rv+
V l!~ A Y~ N O~ A ~O 1r
VO GW/~ V O A N b V iW7f
f.n O~ N ~O W iA ~p a0 V
A O W ~O m ~O LO OD a0
W O~ O W O~ ~ W Q~ N
O b m O V VNi ~ V r~+
T ~O V m b b O a A
ham.. O tin V ~ -~+ b m ~O
W T N W p~ m W O~ JV-
~O O~ ~- V W N ~ N tp
GJ'~ N pD V {/~ V ~p A N
O W O~ tOJ~ O` N ~p W Cn
V ~C 0~ A O W ~C m ~O
Avi: We•o wa.o~.
.O fa0i O m t00 m O V tin
m W V ~ ~O V C ~O t0
O ~O W m 0 ~O V ~O ~O
to V+ A r O Vf V ~O r
A V T W p. N W O+ CVD
-+ N A ~O m W V V'~ A
O O~ O~ A W N
V~ ~ O• Gf1 N m V Vt V
O Vf O O W O~ t~ 4` N
N O N V ap Q~ A O W
A V OmD A V M W O~ O
~ m N ~ W O m ~O m
O Ln V ~ W V ~ ap V
~v a s o ~o W m o io
A V O A V M W G~ N
w Q~ m ~ O Q~ .~ Q~ W
O~ fJ'~ ~O N'~ N~ O~ (!7 N OAD
A V ~O
m v w o v. o o W p.
V OD O N O N V ~O O•
A V W rLf V OmD A V .Op
A V O N W O~ O O A
V .O ~O Q~ Um+ V V+ CWJ V
~G ~G O ~G T O• O ~C W
~O W O tf~ .A T In Vf A
~O ~O p~
N'~ ~ N W tJt V 1A+ N .pr
m .P m O~ Q+ m O p~
N+ ~O to iJ~ O~
rW+ O O~ m V W O Cf~ O
-+ m ~p V m 0 N O N
N A m
m m Vt
Fr Q+ W
W ~ O
tJ'~
m ~O ~O
W ODD Q~
V m m
O~
~O V A
o ~
~°' O tJf
W Vt N
O N ~O
N pAp Vmi
V Gmii .bA
O~
_W iJ~ A
O ~ N
N
W UO'~ N
T
~ ~ ~
~. W
V -+ W
~O
m V O~
O~
N
to Vf O
W ~ O
O
W m A
m T N
a ~ ~
V
~ ~ ~
~••• V tWJ~
b ODD ~
v
o ~
~ OV+ A
~ m ~O
V
V~ N O~
C A N
b m b
W O~ ~
O~ W IN
O .~ ~O
v .`OU
W O~ OVD
V tJ~ A
OV Cn V
V~ O~ N
A O W
m
W T O
m p. W
O~ amp V
.P
m O O
-~' O V+
m
W O~ N
~C m W
O~ A
~ N m
~D
O W O~
V ~C T
O A W
~ A Q~
Gr W N
V V MV+
a O O
A tmr+ v
m V N
-+ O~ W
W O~ O
N A tip
m ~ m
m 07 T
W
V OmD m
O~
~O N ~
~ O tC
~W. O 6Oii
Q~
O N ~
m m CA
V W ~
y W CA/+
O Q~ N
N
W N N
O~
F+ ~ W
b 1~ {.n
m V a
a
N ~
V =.7~ m
W ~O O
e~
c a m ~
Wm O~ N
P ~ ~
V
A N W
~+ V N
b m ~
W a N
:n V ~
0 0..a
~ ~ ~
~O m ~O
V
~ N b
t0 A N
O
.o w cn
~O m ~O
W O+ T
O~ W to
V c,n
m ~C ~p
V ~O -~+
v
V W N
VO N9 V
(/~ T N
.P O W
N A (Waa N A O
V~ .A O .Ii N Cn
N C7 . r ~
N W N W N .Yr
O tJ~ O+ tOi+ ~C m
tJ~ iJf A N O N
N A A N A ~~+
O~ CA A A W CJ
W O . o-+ -+
~-• A ~O ~O m m
Cn . F+
[min ~ m b iNai fV.t
N A V7 N A W
o+ o• v v. A o
V A ~ N m
O N W ~V
O V V O to o~
N~ W N tJ~ tJ~ A
N A V N A r
V V 1•+ T Vf A
OA+ O O ~ .WP aOp
O~ m ~-•• m -+ O~
A 1.1't ~-+ ~ A m
N A m N A tJi
m m to O~ O. V
C~J ~ W tV0 .AP ~
C+ ~O Cn O• V V
W T O G!~ W N
N A ~G N A V
m t0 ~G V V ~+
Cmi m a T O O
~G m to O~ m F+
V m O A tr f+
N N~ -O.• N A m
~C h+ A m m N~
~ O ~ t~.a OV+ GNJ
-" O i!~ W O~ O
W V+ N N A ~
O N ~O m ~O tC
m m fm7~ W m T
~••• m ~O t0 m Cn
V W A V m m
O~ p~
W I.n A N W 1•+
b.. V N .~ N a
'O T N ~ O ~O
O m N W m Q~
w u+ N ~. o to
a o.
w cn a~ W cn N
~"" l/~ ~-' O N t0
b -~+ ~ m ~ im1'~
V+ N N -+ m ~G
m V Q~ V W A
W to V W tJ+ JOi
N O~ V r W 1,n
t!~ N+ m O O~ N
r T W O m N
W ~O O W Nr N
W fJ~ tp W CA O~
W V A -+ tJ~ r+
OD A r W
m T N V ~+ N+
t!'~ m O ~ N N
Q~ A tr m V O•
W V~ r W i.R V
A ap -+ N O~ V
~-+ V ~ ld~ CAJ7 m
~ t0 V 1V-~ O~ W
~G m ~Q W ~O O
V O.
W O~ N W (!'~ ~G
CJ~ O ~O W V A
~ T A m ~ N
A ~ o--.
~O m ~O P .mA tf.
W o~ ~ w cn .~-.
C.fl N T .A ~p ~...
~G .Np N r+ V VWi
t0 W V+ ~O ~C V
~O m ~G ~O OD ~p
N .p Oo
W O ~'
~"•• N V
.A
V N A
m tp N
N A ~
W -+ W
V N ~~+
N .
O+ Q~ ~-+
i/~ O N
A N N
C N A
Gn ~p m
N O N
N A ~-'
A W m
~ m m
N N V
~O W W
fJ~
iNn .p O
tf+ W N
N
coi+ ~ ~
O~ ~ A
~ ~ ~
tmi+ ,~ m
W
Q• T V
V .A- a
tOi~ iVii N
iJ~
V V -V•
~ O O
T m -~+
A {,I~ F+
to
m V N
•.+ p. ry
W
W ~ O
w
m aA0 ~
m m T
V m m
~ rW+ ~
~ O ~G
W m O~
-~ O N~
O~
W ~ N
O N ~O
CND m ~
V GmJ ~
Q+
W 1.n .A
r W to
,O P N
O m N
W (n N
O+
W N'~ O~
~.+ W
~ F~ V~
OD V O~
o+
N ~ V
CJ~ (J~ m
-+ T W
W ~C O
rf-
N W N'~
N N (JI
o --• .a.
~ N Q.
~ N A
A
N 1O+ O
W O ~ O
V O tOJ
A
.y ~O•• A
m t0 N C7
A
W F+ iJ•
~~ ~v
~ O N
iJ~
A r ~
O N A R1
N O N
N A 1~+
:A r ~
iO+ O m „~!
b W W
yNi A O
N m
OW T67
N~ ~./~ A
N
P W O
m ~"' ~ S
y~ A m
to
O~ A W
V A O, --~
VOi W N
w
V OV+ W
~ O O `
~ W Ir
m V N
s.+ O~ W
W ~
O~ ~O ~
W O+ O
tr
m O O
~O m
w m v~ r
V m m
O~
tNp ~ A
N A
.~ O ~p =
W m Q+
-+ O !ft
O
W V1 N
O ~ m
m m ..fl "S
V W A
v~
fW. W iA
O a N
N O
CO.i lA N
w
F.1
w
n
n
fD
a
c
r
fD
n
0
fY
F.1.
a
~../
N
i
v7 v7 ~ ~ ~ C] r
O O ~O r O O N ~1
~O O~ ~D V r o. oo a a
co ~ d
o, r~
r 0
W
N bd
r
D
O r
O G f
O
rt R m rr r rt
fD O n fD r r r
"i rt O rt G !D W
f3. rt 1.77 n
,~d C17 r• ;rJ r• ~
~ ~ w ~ 0 0
•v G o w
a
~
() ~ H ri Q• r
~o co w w
m a oo t~
~
O ~ ~O
R o ~
v a
E c~ R
O ri r
n w ~, ~
T. • rt G N [+7
(D O CA r
ri rt b v
O
H A
R
~ ~"'
n ~
- to 'T1
(A V
W
a
r•
a
fD r
10 O
N
OD
~+
V7
w x
0
N
r
vi
O~ H
V
1.17
r
C b G7 C=] C G7 ~+] C d O ~,
R w fD G R (D r• n fD O~
r• ~-S p QG r• G O r• ~
r T.• fD r• r fD w r w
r• m rS a r• 'i a r• ~
rt w fD rr w n rr rr
`C R+ r-~ (D ~C r (D ~C ~ r
rS \ (D O~
ic7 C!! r • CJ] C G ~ 7C
fD fD G fD rt rr V7
A i't 00 ri r • ~O
rj C C r
(p r• r• r•
w n n rr
n fD fD ~C r--•
r• m m Q~
o ~ ern oor
O V] Gl r• v
O G r O
r r,• r
r• ~ r•
a as
r.Oq r
~ .'7. v
w Ov N ,',~
~ ~
7" r ~ N
r~ w
r•
O
rt r
(D v
a ~ z
w r
a ~
A z
r~ o
rw wr v,~wv, tin o0
8 ~' O
b ~
rn
00 N N N N t•r n r-~ G~
O N N r r O O N
O V7 r W O N I
LL N a
~ ao ~
~-•
N
V7 Gi
OD
DD
C] a H ~ H [~ H
O f) ~S (D w r r•
n A ~o w x rc n
n O w r n r r
N G m (~ ~ f0 N
l~ G G t+7 r Oo n
o n n w x v
p r rr r•
Cn fD C] (D H fA
rt r fY r
n ~• ro n w
C7
O H 7G' fD r
x n ao
~ x
H
rr
w
V7 [rJ
O
r
w
00 ~
V
r
N C,~
r
V
F+
~ x
v
W
r
~O H
N
OD
r
CA 'TJ H ,Z7 CJ C'1 C [=7 'z7 t'' d W ~
G• ~• rt fD O O n G r+• r• (D O
fD G N w~~ r•OO n o' N
rt w w r g ~ r r• (p ~S w
r• G cn r•~• r• r• a w n
M A G L~7 fA Vl rT (p Q+ K rt
rh fD ~"'t y m m `< lD ~C ~ r
~ ~ fD rt r• r• rj ~ tD V7
~ C rt w 0 0 r• tD G O~ 7C
w R R~ ~ p Ul R V
r • r • (D tD fD OQ A In
r-~ r rt r't G
r• a fD
rt y O O
`C CA I-h r•h r
~ a`
uy cn ~~ or
r• to fD N a`
r ~ C C v
r-~ (D (D fD
~'• O O O
O n G G
OQ fD (D r
~ ~
r
rn
0o z
v
O
iz
0
r
r r N O~ r W r r r W [~ V
~ N O
b Oo
N
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER -°
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8 of
Article I of Chapter 12, Adoption of state law
COUNTY /ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : /~~i~%v~
/ ,/,~~ ,~c~ „/Yn GZ~~ .. ~~ ~~~'~
. > j~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Recently a substitute General District Court judge dismissed
a DUI warrant on the basis that the County Code had not been re-
codified to take into account any amendments by the General
Assembly to Titles 46.1 and 18.2 of the Code of Virginia. The
defendant's lawyer relief upon the case of Mitchell v. Hanover
Count Va. App. 486 (1986) which involved a Hanover County ordin-
ance which still referred to Title 18.1 of the Code even after it
was repealed and Title 18.2 adopted by the General Assembly. The
Court of Appeals in the Mitchell case specifically did not answer
the question of whether a local ordinance can lawfully provide
for the incorporation of prospective amendments to the Virginia
Code. Although both this office and the Commonwealth's Attor-
ney's office question the wisdom of the judge's decision, at pre-
sent County magistrates are under instructions not to write DUI
warrants citing the County Code. Until such time as our judges
can be convinced that Section 46.1-188 permits prospective incor-
poration of amendments, the quickest way to remove the present
cloud over Section 12-8 is to recodify this section and reempha-
size that it is included to incorporate all amendments by the
General Assembly which are effective up to this time.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
It will permit the County to continue to collect up to
approximately $10,000 per month in fines.
-!
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING
SECTION 12-8 OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article
I, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be
amended and readopted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of section 46.1-188 of the
Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the
laws of the state contained in title 46.1 and in article 2 (sec-
tion 18.2-266 et seq.) of chapter 7 of title 18.2 of the Code of
Virginia, except those provisions and requirements the violation
of which constitutes a felony, and except those provisions and
requirements which, by their very nature, can have no application
to or within the county, are hereby adopted and incorporated in
this chapter by reference and made applicable within the county.
References to "highways of the state" contained in such provi-
sions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to
the streets, highways and other public ways within the county.
Such provisions and requirements, as amended from time to time,
are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as
though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for
any person within the county to violate or fail, neglect or
refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; pro-
vided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the viola-
tion of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the
penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby
adopted.
The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of
the laws of the state" as used hereb shall be construed to
include all amendments to said laws made effective prior to the
date that this ordinance is adopted.
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be
May 25, 1988.
~!
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt these
ordinance amendments.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney ~
-------
-------------------------ACTION VOTE
Motion b No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) y' Garrett
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To Robers
ITEM NUMBER ~ -_-'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and
Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Section 9-2,
Article II, and Article III, "Fire Protection Code" and by the
enactment of a new Article II to provide for the establishment of
certain permit and inspection fees and to authorize the
enforcement of same.
COUNTY /~ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~, V7iL-Cy~vi~ 2~ °U ~ir
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Old Code
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on August
28, 1984, the Basic Fire Prevention Code of 1981, Fifth Edition,
of BOCA International, Inc. was adopted. The 1981 Fire Prevention
Code is a set of regulations addressing fire and safety standards
for existing buildings. The code has been accepted by local
business people and has reduced the fire loss in Roanoke County.
Adoption of this code was in line with State legislation. The
1981 BOCA code is strictly a maintenance code. Section 8.2-15
makes provisions for permit fees. None have been established.
New Code
The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is a mandatory
statewide set of regulations. It was adopted by the Board of
Housing and Community Development on December 14, 1987. The new
code became effective March 1, 1988. It supersedes all fire
prevention regulations heretofore adopted by local governments.
More restrictive amendments may be adopted if they do not affect
the manner of construction or materials to be used.
Maior Changes
The Statewide Fire Prevention Code requires resident and
employee training in certain occupancies. The areas of training
are in exit drills, life safety procedures, and evacuation drills.
Action Required
F-102.1 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code gives
the local government the option to enforce the code through the
local fire marshal. The State Fire Marshal shall enforce the code
in those jurisdictions that choose not to enforce the code.
FISCAL IMPACT
The permit process can be administered with existing
personnel. Fire company personnel can be utilized in this
program. The funds generated by the permit process and fire lane
tickets will be assessed at a later date. The need for additional
personnel will be addressed at that time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Option I
1. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors charge
the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County with enforcement of
the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
2. Staff further recommends that a $25 permit fee be
imposed for each of the 32 areas so addressed in the
Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The permit
process is to be administered as outlined by Section F-
104 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
Option II
1. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors charge
the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County with enforcement of
the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
2. No fee be imposed.
Staff recommends Option I, and the proposed ordinance be
approved f ollowing the second reading and public hearing on May
24, 1988.
SUBriITTED BY:
APPROVED:
-~~ .L' ~ -- -- ~~
K. R. Sh rp ~ ~ Elmer~C. Hodge, Jr. ~~_~___._
Fire Marshal County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
No Yes Abs
~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988.
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION
AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
REPEALING SECTION 9-2, "POSSESSION, SALE,
DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS," THE REPEAL OF
ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND THE REPEAL OF
ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE,"; AND BY THE
ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA
STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND
INSPECTION FEES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT
OF SAME.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code,
"Possession, sale, discharge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby
deleted and repealed in its entirety.
2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the
Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its
entirety.
3. That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter
9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in
its entirety.
4. That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is
hereby amended and re-enacted as follows:
Section 1.
That pursuant to the provisions of
Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke
County shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code
as written with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Code
was adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community
~- 2
Development and said Board promulgated certain regulations and
procedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this
Code. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is
incorporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length
herein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the
Fire Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be
referred to as such or as this Code.
Section 2. The purposes of this Code are to provide
for statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard life
and property from the hazards of fire or explosion arising from
the improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention and
protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and the
unsafe storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, and
devices wherever located.
Section 3. The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby
directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall
establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for
the administration and enforcement of said Code. The County Fire
Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation
of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of
Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordinate
his enforcement activities with the County Building Official and
Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and detail
such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as
inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in
administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code.
2
~`~
Section 4.
There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five
Dollar ($25) fee for all permits issued pursuant to the
provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Any
permit issued shall be by the Office of the Fire Marshal.
Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall not
be applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton.
Section 6.
That the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section
27-97 of the Code of Virginia in the following respects:
1. F-102.1 Enforcement officers. Add the
following at the end of the existing subsection
2.
3.
F.102.1:
The provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code shall be enforced by
the Office of the Fire Marshal, also herein referred
to as the Fire Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal,
members of the Fire Marshal's staff, the Fire
Prevention Division, or the Fire Official.
F-102.1.1 Inspection by others. Add
subsection F-102.1.1 as follows:
The Chief of the Fire De artment may desi gnate such
other persons as he deems necessary to make fire
safety inspections. Such ersons shall use the
Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this
Code as the basis for such inspections.
F-102.1.2 Impersonation.
F-102.1.2 as follows:
Add subsection
3
`_/ ,,
It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized person to
use a badge, uniform or any other credentials so as
to gain access to any building, marine vessel,
vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise false)
identify himself as the fire official or his
designated representative.
4. F-103.4 Investigation of fires. Add
subsection F-103.4 as follows:
The Fire Marshal shall investigate or cause to be
investigated, every fire or explosion occurring
within the County that is of a suspicious nature or
which involves the loss of life or causes injury to
persons or causes destruction of or damage to
property. Such investigation shall be made at the
time of the fire or at a subsequent time, depending
on the nature and circumstances of the fire. The
Fire Marshal shall take charge immediately of the
physical evidence and, in order to preserve any
physical evidence relating to the cause or origin of
such fire or explosion, take means to prevent access
by any person or persons to such buildin ,
structure, or premises until such evidence has been
properly processed.
5. F-103.4.1 Summonsing the Fire Marshal. Add
subsection F-103.4.1 as follows:
The fire department officer-in-charge of any fire,
explosion or incident scene shall immediate)
4
-` c1.
summons the Fire Marshal to such scene to
investigate the circumstances involved where such
circumstances require investigation as outlined in
F-1 fly _ 4 of this Code.
6. F-103.5 Modifications. Add the subsection
F-103.5 as follows:
The fire official shall have the power to modify any
provision or requirement of this Code, upon written
application by the owner, lessee, occupant or their
legal representative, when there is practical_
difficulty in meeting the strict letter of the Code.
However, in all cases of modification, the spirit
and intent of the Code shall be met to ensure the
health, safety and welfare of persons is protected.
7. F-103.6 Notification of fire department. Add
subsection F-103.6 as follows:
In anv buildina subject to inspection under an
provision of this Code, when a fire or evidence of
there having been a fire discovered, even though it
has apparently been extinguished, it shall be
immediately reported to the Chief of the fire
department, or his designee. This shall be the duty
of the owner, manager, or person in control of such
building at the time of discovery. This requirement
shall not be construed to forbid the owner, manager,
or person in control of said building from using all
5
~ -~
diligence necessary to extin uish such fire rior
to the arrival of the fire department.
8. F-201.0 Applied Meaning of Words and Terms:
Add to section F-201.0 the following words, terms
and meanings:
Fire Lanes:
An area designated by clearly visible
signs in which parking shall be prohibited, whether
on public or private property, to ensure ready
access for and to fire fighting and rescue equipment
and facilities.
9. F-303.0 Torches for the Removal of Paint.
Add the following words to the title:
or Sweating Pipe Joints.
10. F-303.3 Sweating Joints. Add the following
subsection F-303.3:
Any person using a torch or other flame producing
device for sweating pipe joints in any building or
structure shall have available in the immediate
vicinity where the sweating is done one (1) approved
fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a water
supply. Combustible material in close roximity to
the work shall be protected against ignition by
shielding, wetting or other approved means. In all
cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of
the sweating operation for one-half (1/2) hour after
the torch or flame producing device has been used
6
C-.2
11. F-303.3.1 Permit Required. Add subsection
F-303.3.1 as follows:
A permit shall be obtained from the fire official
prior to using a torch or other flame producing
device for sweating pipe joints in any buildin or
qtr„mot,,,-A
12. F-313.1 Designation. Delete and
substitute as follows:
~Phe eeele e~~lelal small ~ee~nl~e asel e~eslgrsate
pt~blle e~ p~l~ate ~lre lases as elee~neel aeeessa~~ fey
tl~e e~~leler~t ar~d effee~lde t~se e€ flame appa~att~s-
Fl~e lanes shall l~a~e a r~tlnl~tt~xt wld~t~ e€ l8 feet
(5486 x~~-
The fire official shall designate fire lanes on
public streets and on private property where
necessary for the purpose of preventin arkinq in
front of or adjacent to fire hydrants and fire
department connections and to ensure access to
buildings and structures for fire fighting and
rescue apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum
width of 18 feet (5486 mm) .
13. F-313.4 Signs and Markings. Add section
F-313.4 as follows:
The property owner or designee shall su ly and
install signs and other required markin s to
delineate fire lanes as directed by the fire
.LL. __ .1
7
- .L~
14. F-313.5 Specifications. Add section F-313.5
as follows:
Fire lanes shall conform to the followin
specifications:
(A) The design of such signs shall conform to the
state manual on uniform traffic-control devices
and shall include the language "No Parking-Fire
Lane."
(B) Signs designating fire lanes shall be located
so as to provide at least one sign for every
one hundred (100) feet of fire lane space.
Should the fire marshal determine that
additional signs are necessary, the owner or
agent of the roperty shall provide the same.
All such signs shall be maintained in proper
position and sufficiently legible to be seen by
an ordinarily observant person.
(C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows:
(1) Pave edge to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than
10'
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(2) Curb face to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(3) Pavement top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
8
G~ -Z
Urban: 7'
(4) Curb top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7'
(D) Posts for fire lane signs, where required,
shall be metal and securely mounted.
(E) The curb or pavement edge of all fire lanes
shall be painted yellow. Any existing marking
in the area designated as a fire lane shall be
obliterated or painted over in a manner
approved by the fire marshal.
15. F-313.6 Where fire lanes are designated at
fire hydrant locations.
The following shall apply where fire lanes are
established at fire hydrant locations:
(1) Where hydrants are located at or close to the
curb line or edge of the road and face on a
public street, a public parking lot or a
private road open to the public, parking within
fifteen (15) feet is prohibited.
(2) A special curb marking designated areas
established pursuant to (1) above, shall be
required and shall be yellow.
(3) No planting, erection or other obstruction
shall be allowed within four (4) feet of the
fire hydrant.
9
ITEM NUMBER L--7 _
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE:
May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2988-6 authorizing the
lease of approximately five (5) acres in the Hollins/
Old Mountain Road area by the County of Roanoke from
Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS/
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of Supervisors
authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres located in
the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand for recrea-
tional purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6). The term of the lease
was for a twenty-five (25) year period.
Steve Goldfarb, a representative of Ingersoll-Rand, re-
quested that the term of the lease be reduced to a three (3) year
renewable period to allow for plant expansion which may occur
within the next twenty-five years. Specifically, the term of the
lease will be three (3) years and it will be expressly agreed
between Ingersoll-Rand and Roanoke County that the leased pre-
mises shall be utilized for recreational purposes. Roanoke
County will locate one baseball/softball field with backstop and
team benches. Access to the tract will be from Old Mountain Road
and off-street parking will be located adjacent to the ballfield.
During the term of the lease maintenance of the premises will be
the responsibility of Roanoke County; however, routine cleanup
will be the responsibility of the using party.
Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that the acqui-
sition of any interest in real estate be accomplished by ordin-
ance. The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on
May 10, 1988; the second reading will be held May 24, 1988.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$1.00 per year plus costs of any improvements made by Roa-
noke County.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendation:
`~
1. That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of
the proposed ordinance.
2. That the County Administrator be authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which
shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
1
_ 'fin ~n i
11l• 'r ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
ACTION VOTE
wt ,-. v..o The
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TIIE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2988-6
AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF APPROXIMATELY
FIVE (5) ACRES IN THE HOLLTNS/OLD
MOUNTAIN ROAD AREA BY THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE FROM INGERSOLL RAND F'OR
RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That at the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of
Supervisors authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres
located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand
for recreational purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6) The term of
the lease was for a twenty-five (25) year period; and
2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby amends Ordin-
ance No. 2988-6 adopted February 9, 1988; and
3. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the amend-
went of the lease of the hereinafter-described real estate was
held on May 10, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held
on May 24, 1988. This real estate is located in the Hollins/Old
Mountain Road area of Roanoke County; and
4. That the lease by Roanoke County from Ingersoll
Rand of approximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old
Mountain Road area of Roanoke County for recreational purposes is
hereby authorized and approved; and
5. That the annual lease amount or rental shall be
$1.00; and that the term of this lease shall be for a three (3)
year renewable term; and
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of
which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
~-.
ITEM NUMBER / -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Four-year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins Magisterial
District. His term expired January 22, 1988.
Four-year term of B. J. King, Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
His term expires April 13, 1988.
Four-year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton Magisterial District.
His term expires April 27, 1988.
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services
Advisory Board•
One-year term of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School.
Her term expired November 13, 1987.
Two-year terms of Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District; Dr. J.
Andrew Archer, Vinton District; and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills
District expired 3/22/88.
One-year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring,
expired 3/22/88.
Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services, has indicated that
this Council has not been active for quite some time. Staff is
investigating the future active status of this Council.
3. Fifth Planning District Commission
Three-year term of Citizen Representative Lee Eddy. Mr. Eddy's
term expires June 30, 1988.
4. Industrial Development Authority
This Committee is also inactive, but does have financial and
legal obligations on behalf of the County. The attorney for the
~r_~-
Industrial Development Authority recommends that new members be
appointed or the old members reappointed even though it is not
active at this time.
Four-year term of Charles R. Saul, Cave Spring Magisterial
District. His term expired September 26, 1987. Mr. Saul has
indicated his willingness to continue to serve in this capacity.
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Three-year terms of Kenneth Bowen, Catawba Magisterial District;
Yvonne Willis, Catawba Magisterial District; James Bryant,
Hollins Magisterial District; Paul Bailey, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District; and Roger Falls, Vinton Magisterial
District. Their terms will expire June 30, 1988.
SUBMITTED BY:
~~ ~•
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
TO:
ACTION
Motion by: _
APPROVED BY:
'1
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
VOTE
Yes No
Garrett
Johnson _
McGraw
Nickens _
Robers
Abs
.~. - /
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMFINTS AND APPEALS
A. COMPOSITION:
To be comprised o~ Five (5)~ members; appointed by the Board
of Supervisors. Members may be reappointed, and terms should be
staggered so that less than half o~ the terms expire in any one
year. The Board o~ Supervisors may appoint alternate members who
may sit on the Board in the absence o:E any regular.iaembers, and
shall have the ~Eull power and authority of the regular member..
Board members shall be selected on the basis of their ability to
render :Fair and competent decisions regarding application o:E the
code, and shall to the extent possible represent.difEerent
occupational or pro:Eessional Fields: At least one member should
be an experienced builder. At least one member should be a
licensed proFessional engineer or architect..
B. DUTIES:
Shall act on application for appeals•as•required by Section.
36-105 of the Code of Virginia; or it shall enter into an
agreement with the governing body of another county or
municipality or with some other agency, or a State agency .
approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and'Community
Development.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
'..i The Board shall meet upon notice of the chairman or at
stated periodic meetings iF warranted by the. volume of work. The
Board shall meet within ten working days of the filing of an
appeal.
- COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND
' FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY~BOARD
A. COMPOSITION
Board to consist of two members .from each magisterial
.district,' and one youth member from each high school. Governing
bodies of each county and city served by a court service,uait may
appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council.
g.. DUTIES
• Advises and cooperates with the..court upon all matters
affecting the working of this law and other laws~relating.to
children, their care and protection and *o.domestic relations;
Consults and confer with the-court and director o~ the
court service unit relative to the development and extension of"
-`~•~°<~~' the court service program;
Encourage the members selected by the council to serve,on~
the central advisory council to visit as often as•the member.
conveniently can, institutions and•assoeiations receiving
children under this law and to report to the court the conditions
and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any.
such persons, institutions or associations. .
The Council should make themselves familiar with the work
of the court. Makes an annual report~to the court and the
participating governing bodies on the.work of the council.
~.~.;,.
As the Youth and Family. services Advisory Board:_
Establish goals and priorities Eor County-wide youth
services; assist in coordination 'and planning for comprehensive •
youth services within the private sector. Serve in~-an advisory
', capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to
establish goals and objectives in compliance wi~tti all "minimum
Standards of the Delinquency'Preventi.on and Youth Development Act
of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of
youth every :Five years and to assist in developing an annual
~• Delinquency Prevention Plan, Further to participate in evaluating
. the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the
Board of Supervisors. Provide a public Forum where concerns
.about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and
raise concerns o•F public and private organizations at any regular
advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary
legislative amendments to improve community conditions For youth
development and to support the development of needed services
both public and private For youth in the community.
C, MEETING SCHEDULE:
One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time
and place determined at meetings
~'""
s
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
A. COMPOSITION
Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of
Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who
shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members
who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall•be
three years.
One of the members shall also serve on the Executive
Committee . •
The Fifth Planning District Commission represents
participating local governments included in the geographic area
delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is
composed of 21 elected 'and citizen representatives of the
• participating jurisdictions.
B. DUTIES
The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia
Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient
development of the physical, social and economic elements of the
District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental
subdivisions to plan for the future."
The general management program category provides the •.
basic organization and management of.commission activities and
routine administrative functions. Because general management
supports the entire operation of the commission's work program,
costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered
as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program
categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation
Plan .
C. MEETING SCHEDULE
Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission
Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.)
~. -
A.
COMPOSITION:
(Summarized from State Code 15.1.1377)
To be composed of seven (7) directors, appointed by the
Board of Supervisors; for terms .of four (4) years, except
appointments to fill vacancies which shall be for the unexpired
terms .
B. DUTIES:
Has authority to sue or be sued and to.pros~ecute and defend
at law~or in equity in any court having jurisdiction of the
subject matter and of the parties. Adopted and use a corporate
seal; Contract and be contracted with; Acquire, improve and
maintain and equip and furnish one or more authority facilities
including all real and personal properties which the board of
directors of the authority may deem necessary in connection
therewith-.and regardless of whether or not any such facilities
shall then be in existence; To lease to others any or all of its
facilities and to charge and collect rent therefore; To issue its
bonds for the purpose of carrying out any of its powers including
specifically any power conferred.
To appoint an industrial advisory committee to advise the
authority; To borrow money and to accept contributions, grants,
and other financial assistance from the United States of America
and agencies or instrumentalities thereof, the Commonwealth or
any political subdivision, agency or public instrumentality of
the Commonwealth for or in aid of the construction, acquisition,
ownership, maintenance or repair of the authority facilities.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Called meetings.
~~""-
PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
A• COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985)
To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial
district and one (1) member at large from the County. All
members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors.
Original terms shall be staggared. Upon expiration of
their original terms, each succeeding term shall~be for three (3)
years, expiring on June 30th.
B. ~ DUTIES:
The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the
Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the
Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and
the Board of Supervisors .through the Director of Parks and
Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in
this resolution.. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between
the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors,
and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work
through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters.
The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies,
programs, personnel, finances, and the need~for acquiring and
disposing of lands and properties related to the total community
recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for
recreation.
The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation
purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the
establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the
County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds,
recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and
structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the
County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may
suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and
for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures
as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds
allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any
grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property
offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it
judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation.
Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise
of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the
County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms
under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4>
and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and
maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all
buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Departmen t
function, and will advise in regard to other recreation
Facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or
loaned to the unit.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
ORDINANCE 51088-8 AMENDING AND
REENACTING CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, BY THE ADDITION
OF A NEW ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED
FOOD AND BEVERAGES; SUCH NEW ARTICLE
VIII IMPOSING A TAX ON CERTAIN FOOD AND
BEVERAGES SOLD IN THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 58.1-3833,
CODE OF VIRGINIA (1950), AS AMENDED,
AND PROVIDING FOR THE AMOUNT OF SUCH
TAX, PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTION, DUTIES
OF SELLERS AND DUTIES OF LOCAL
OFFICIALS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH TAX,
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, CIVIL PENALTIES
FOR LATE PAYMENT, MISDEMEANOR PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE, EXEMPTIONS,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, after consideration of this subject and after
an opportunity for the citizens of this County to be heard upon
this matter at a public hearing held on April 12, 1988, pursuant
to Section 58.1-3007, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on April 26, 1988, and the second reading on this ordinance was
held on May 10, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, finds that it is appropriate to impose a tax on certain
food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to
Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Code of Roanoke
County, is hereby amended and reenacted by the addition of a new
Article VIII, Tax on prepared food and beverages, to read and
provide as follows:
ARTICLE VIII.
TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES
Sec. 21-150. Definitions.
The following words and phrases, when used in this arti-
cle, shall have, for the purposes of this article, the following
respective meanings except where the context clearly indicates a
different meaning:
(a) Caterer: A person who furnishes food on the prem-
ises of another, for compensation.
(b) Commissioner of the Revenue: The Commissioner of
the Revenue of the County of Roanoke, and any of
his duly authorized deputies, assistants, employ-
ees or agents.
(c) Food: Any and all edible refreshments or nourish-
ment, liquid or otherwise, including alcoholic
beverages, purchased in or from a restaurant or
from a caterer, except snack foods.
(d) Person: Any individual, corporation, company,
association, firm, partnership or any group of
individuals acting as a unit.
(e) Purchaser: Any person who purchases food in or
from a restaurant or from a caterer.
(f) Restaurant: Any place in or from which food is
sold in the County, including, but not limited to,
any restaurant, dining room, grill, coffee shop,
cafeteria, cafe, snack bar, lunch counter, delica-
tessen, confectionery, bakery, eating house, eat-
ery, drugstore, vending machine, lunch wagon or
truck, pushcart or other mobile facility from
which food is sold, public or private club, re-
sort, bar or lounge. The word "restaurant" shall
not mean a grocery store or supermarket except for
any space or section therein designated as a deli-
catessen or for the sale of prepared sandwiches,
delicatessen food or food prepared in a delicates-
sen.
(g) Seller: Any person who sells food in or from a
restaurant or as a caterer.
2
(h) Snack food: Unopened bottles or cans of carbon-
ated soft drinks; chewing gum; candy; popcorn;
peanuts and other nuts; unopened packages of cook-
ies, donuts, crackers and potato chips; and other
items of essentially the same nature and consumed
for essentially the same purpose.
(i) Treasurer: The Treasurer of the County of Roanoke
and any of his duly authorized deputies, assis-
tants, employees or agents.
Sec. 21-151. Levy of tax; amount.
In addition to all other taxes and fees of any kind now
or hereafter imposed by law, a tax is hereby levied and imposed
on the purchaser of all food served, sold or delivered in the
County in or from a restaurant, whether prepared in such restau-
rant or not and whether consumed on the premises or not, or by a
caterer. The rate of this tax shall be four (4) percent of the
amount paid for such food. In the computation of this tax, any
fraction of one-half cent or more shall be treated as one cent.
Sec. 21-152. Payment and collection of tax.
Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is
levied under this article shall collect the amount of tax imposed
under this article from the purchaser on whom the same is levied
at the time payment for such food becomes due and payable, whe-
ther payment is to be made in cash or on credit by means of a
credit card or otherwise. The amount of tax owed by the purcha-
ser shall be added to the cost of the food by the seller who
shall pay the taxes collected to the County as provided in this
article. Taxes collected by the seller shall be held in trust by
the seller until remitted to the County.
Sec. 21-153. Reports and remittances Generally.
Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is
levied under this article shall make out a report, upon such
forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of
the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food
charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and shall
sign and deliver such report to the County Treasurer with a remit-
tance of such tax. Such reports and remittance shall be made on
or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of
tax collected during the preceding month.
Sec. 21-154.
Preservation of records.
It shall be the duty of any seller of food liable for
collection and remittance of the taxes imposed by this article to
keep and preserve for a period of three years records showing
gross sales of all food and beverages, the amount charged the
purchaser of each such purchase, the date thereof, the taxes col-
3
lected thereon and the amount of tax required to be collected by
this article. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall have the
power to examine such records at reasonable times and without
unreasonable interference with the business of the seller, for
the purpose of administering and enforcing the provisions of this
article and to make copies of all or any parts thereon.
Sec. 21-155. Advertising payment or absorption of tax prohib-
ited.
No seller shall advertise or hold out to the public in
any manner, directly or indirectly, that all or any part of the
tax imposed under this article will be paid or absorbed by the
seller or anyone else, or that the seller or anyone else will
relieve the purchaser of the payment of all or any part of the
tax.
Sec. 21-156. Tips and service charges.
Where a purchaser provides a tip for an employee of a
seller, and the amount of the tip is wholly in the discretion of
the purchaser, the tip is not subject to the tax imposed by this
article, whether paid in cash to the employee or added to the
bill and charged to the purchaser's account, provided, in the
latter case, the full amount of the tip is turned over to the
employee by the seller.
An amount or percent, whether designated as a tip or a
service charge, that is added to the price of the meal by the
seller, and required to be paid by the purchaser, is a part of
the selling price of the meal and is subject to the tax imposed
by this article.
Sec. 21-157. Duty of seller when QoinQ out of business.
Whenever any seller required to collect any pay to the
County a tax under this article shall cease to operate or other-
wise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article
shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall
immediately make a report and pay the tax due.
Sec. 21-158. Discount.
For the purpose of compensating sellers for the collec-
tion of the tax imposed by this article, every seller shall be
allowed three (3) percent of the amount of the tax due and ac-
counted for in the form of a deduction on his monthly return;
provided, the amount due is not delinquent at the time of pay-
ment.
Sec. 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue.
The Commissioner of the Revenue shall promulgate rules
and regulations for the interpretation, administration and en-
4
forcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Com-
missioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller
liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who
fails, refuses or neglects to collect such tax or to make the
reports and remittances required by this article. The Commis-
sioner of the Revenue shall have all of the enforcement powers as
authorized by Article 1, Chapter 31 of Title 58.1 of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended, for purposes of this Article.
Sec. 21-160. Procedure upon failure to collect, report, etc.
If any seller, whose duty it is to do so shall fail or
refuse to collect the tax imposed under this article and to make,
within the time provided in this article, the reports and remit-
tances mentioned in this article, the Commissioner of the Revenue
shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts
and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As
soon as the Commissioner of the Revenue shall procure such facts
and information as he is able to obtain upon which to base the
assessment of any tax payable by any seller who has failed or
refused to collect such tax and to make such report and remit-
tance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such
seller the tax and penalties provided for by this article and
shall notify such seller, by registered mail sent to his last
known place of address, of the total amount of such tax and penal-
ties and the total amount thereof shall be payable within ten
(10) days from the date such notice is sent.
Sec. 21-161. Duty of County Treasurer.
The Treasurer shall have the power and the duty of
collecting the taxes imposed and levied hereunder and shall cause
the same to be paid into the general treasury for the County.
Sec. 21-162. Penalty of late remittance or false return.
(a) If any seller whose duty it is to do so shall fail
or refuse to file any report required by this article or to remit
to the County Treasurer the tax required to be collected and paid
under this article within the time and in the amount specified
in this article, there shall be added to such tax by the County
Treasurer a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the fail-
ure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten
(10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional
thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure
continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggre-
gate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00).
(b) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with
intent to defraud the County of any tax due under this article, a
penalty of fifty (50) percent of the tax shall be assessed
against the person required to collect such tax.
Sec. 21-163. Violations of article.
5
Any person violating, failing, refusing or neglecting
to comply with any provision of this article shall be guilty of a
Class 3 misdemeanor. Conviction of such violation shall not
relieve any person from the payment, collection or remittance of
the taxes provided for in this article. Any agreement by any
person to pay the taxes provided for in this article by a series
of installment payments shall not relieve any person of criminal
liability for violation of this article until the full amount of
taxes agreed to be paid by such person is received by the Trea-
surer. Each failure, refusal, neglect or violation, and each
day's continuance thereof, shall constitute a separate offense.
Sec. 21-164. Exemptions.
The following purchases of food shall not be subject to
the tax under this article:
(a) Food furnished by restaurants to employees as part
of their compensation when no charge is made to
the employee.
(b) Food sold by non-profit day care centers, public
or private elementary or secondary schools or food
sold by any college or university to its students
or employees.
(c) Food for use or consumption by the Commonwealth,
any political subdivision of the Commonwealth or
the United States.
(d) Food furnished by a hospital, medical clinic, con-
valescent home, nursing home, home for the aged,
infirm or handicapped or other extended care facil-
ity to patients or residents thereof.
(e) Food Furnished by a non-profit charitable organiza-
tion to elderly, infirm, handicapped or needy per-
sons in their homes or at central locations.
(f) Food sold by a non-profit educational, charitable
or benevolent organization on an occasional basis
as a fund-raising activity or food sold by a
church or religious body on an occasional basis.
(g) Any other sale of food which is exempt from taxa-
tion under the Virginia Retail Sales and Use Tax
Act, or administrative rules and regulations
issued pursuant thereto.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect on and after July 1, 1988.
6
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/13/88
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred A. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Francis W. Burkart, Camnonwealth Attorney
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
Magistrate
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, SW, Roanoke 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
7
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER /~7` -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINTSTRATION CEN'PER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
May 10, 1988
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAP':CER 21 OF
THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, BY 'I'HE ADDITION
OF A NEW ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AN_D_
BEVERAGES; SUCH NEW ARTICLE VIII IMPOSING A TAX ON
CERTAIN FOOD AND BEVERAGES SOLD IN THE COUN'T'Y OF
ROANOKE, PURSUAN'P TO SECTION 58.1-3833, CODE OF
VIRGINIA (1950), AS AMENDED, AND PROVIDING F'OR TI3E
AMOUNT OF SUCH TAX, PROCEDURES F'OR COLLECTION,
DUTIES OF SELLERS AND DUTIES OF LOCAL OFFICIALS
WI'.PH RESPECT TO SUCH TAX, ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES,
CIVIL PENALTIES FOR LATE PAYMENT, MISDEMEANOR PEN-
ALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE, EXEMPTIONS, ANL)
AN EFFECTIVE DATE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~/ .~d.~
BACKGROUND : /r/'-~"N"'"~'~'" ~KLy~~-tt ,
The 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assembly enacted
Section 58.1-3833 which authorized certain counties to adopt a
local- ordinance imposing a tax on food and beverages in an amount
not to exceed four (4%) percent of the amount charged after a
public hearing by unanimous vote. The earliest date such an
ordinance could be effective is July 1, 1988.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
As directed by the Board of Supervisors, staff has adver-
tised the proposed ordinance imposing a tax on prepared food and
beverages in the newspaper on March 29, 1988, and April 5, 1988.
These advertisements gave notice of a public hearing on April 12,
1988, on this matter, which has been held.
The first reading on this proposed ordinance is scheduled
for April 26, 1988, and the second reading on this ordinance is
scheduled for May 10, 1988. Attached you will find a draft copy
of this proposed ordinance as wel_1 as a copy of the legal notice.
This ordinance is substantia]_Iy consistent with Roanoke
City's ordinance, which should minimize confusion and ease en-
forcement within the Roanoke valley.
~- l
The goal of this proposed ordinance is to provide a fair,
equitable, and consistent tax treatment to all participants from
this tax on prepared food and beverages. Beginning July 1, 1988,
this tax will be levied on the "purchaser" of all prepared food
and beverages. "Food" is defined as "any and all edible refresh-
ments or nourishment, liquid or otherwise, including alcoholic
beverages, purchased in or from a restaurant or from a caterer,
except snack foods."
Please note the following items of special interest:
° Rate of Tax - 40 - Section 21-151
° Discount - 30 of the amount due - Section 21-158
° Exemptions, Section 21-164
FISCAL IMPACT
It is estimated that a four (40) percent levy on food and
beverages could generate revenue over twelve (12) months of
$1,200,000 to $1,500,000. Staff will need to purchase forms and
a computer during the current fiscal year in order to have the
program in operation by July 1, 1988. The cost will be
approximately $3,500 for forms and $8,000 for the computer
equipment. This appropriation could be taken from the Board
Contingency which currently has a balance of $30,733.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Proceed with the required first and second readings of
the proposed ordinance on April 26, 1988, and May 10, 1988, and
approve and adopt same and adopt necessary appropriation for the
realted expenses during the current year.
2. Do not proceed with the required first and second read-
ings of the proposed ordinance on April 26, 1988, and May 10,
1988; do not adopt the proposed ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board proceed with Alternative 1.
Respectfully submitted,
~ ~.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS`I'RA'1'ION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988 ~/ s
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING
CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE,
TAXATION, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW
ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND
BEVERAGES; SUCH NEW ARTICLE VIII
IMPOSING A TAX ON CERTAIN FOOD AND
BEVERAGES SOLD IN THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 58.1-3833,
CODE OF VIRGINIA (1950), AS AMENDED,
AND PROVIDING FOR THE AMOUNT OF SUCH
TAX, PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTION, DUTIES
OF SELLERS AND DUTIES OF LOCAL
OFFICIALS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH TAX,
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, CIVIL PENALTIES
FOR LATE PAYMEN'T', MISDEMEANOR PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE, EXEMPTIONS,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, after consideration of this subject and after
an opportunity for the citizens of this County to be heard upon
this matter at a public hearing held on April 12, 1988, pursuant
to Section 58.1-3007, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on April 26, 1988, and the second reading on this ordinance was
held on May 10, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, finds that it is appropriate to impose a tax on certain
food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to
Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Code of Roanoke
County, is hereby amended and reenacted by the addition of a new
Article VIII, Tax on prepared food and beverages, to read and
provide as follows:
1
ARTICLE VIII. ~ / _ /
TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES
Sec. 21-150. Definitions.
The following words and phrases, when used in this arti-
cle, shall have, for the purposes of this article, the following
respective meanings except where the context clearly indicates a
different meaning:
(a) Caterer: A person who furnishes food on the prem-
ises of another, for compensation.
(b) Commissioner of the Revenue: The Commissioner of
the Revenue of the County of Roanoke, and any of
his duly authorized deputies, assistants, employ-
ees or agents.
(c) Food: Any and all edible refreshments or nourish-
ment, liquid or otherwise, including alcoholic
beverages, purchased in or from a restaurant or
from a caterer, except snack foods.
(d) Person: Any individual, corporation, company,
association, firm, partnership or any group of
individuals acting as a unit.
(e) Purchaser: Any person who purchases food in or
from a restaurant or from a caterer.
(f) Restaurant: Any place in or from which food is
sold in the County, including, but not limited to,
any restaurant, dining room, grill, coffee shop,
cafeteria, cafe, snack bar, lunch counter, delica-
tessen, confectionery, bakery, eating house, eat-
ery, drugstore, vending machine, lunch wagon or
truck, pushcart or other mobile facility from
which food is sold, public or private club, re-
sort, bar or lounge. The word "restaurant" shall
not mean a grocery store or supermarket except for
any space or section therein designated as a deli-
catessen or for the sale of prepared sandwiches,
delicatessen food or food prepared in a delicates-
sen.
(g) Seller: Any person who sells food in or from a
restaurant or as a caterer.
(h) Snack food: Unopened bottles or cans of carbon-
ated soft drinks; chewing gum; candy; popcorn;
peanuts and other nuts; unopened packages of cook-
ies, donuts, crackers and potato chips; and other
items of essentially the same nature and consumed
for essentially the same purpose.
2
f
(i)
Treasurer: The Treasurer of the
and any of his duly authorized
tants, employees or agents.
County of Roanoke
deputies, assis-
Sec. 21-151.
Levy of tax; amount.
In addition to all other taxes and fees of any kind now
or hereafter imposed by law, a tax is hereby levied and imposed
on the purchaser of al_1 food served, sold or delivered in the
County in or from a restaurant, whether prepared in such restau-
rant or not and whether consumed on the premises or not, or by a
caterer. The rate of this tax shall be four (4) percent of the
amount paid for such food. In the computation of this tax, any
fraction of one-half cent or more shall be treated as one cent.
Sec. 21-152. Payment and collection of tax.
Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is
levied under this article shall collect the amount of tax imposed
under this article from the purchaser on whom the same is levied
at the time payment for such food becomes due and payable, whe-
ther payment is to be made in cash or on credit by means of a
credit card or otherwise. The amount of tax owed by the purcha-
ser shall be added to the cost of the food by the seller who
shall pay the taxes collected to the County as provided i.n this
article. Taxes collected by the seller shall be held in trust by
the seller until remitted to the County.
Sec. 21-153. Reports and remittances enerally.
Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is
levied under this article shall make out a report, upon such
forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of
the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food
charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and sha:Ll
sign and deliver such report to the County Treasurer with a remit-
tance of such tax. Such reports and remittance shal]_ be made on
or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of
tax collected during the preceding month.
Sec. 21-154. Preservation of records.
It shall be the duty of any seller of food liable for
collection and remittance of the taxes imposed by this article to
keep and preserve for a period of three years records showing
gross sales of all food and beverages, the amount charged the
purchaser of each such purchase, the date thereof, the taxes col-
lected thereon and the amount of tax required to be collected by
this article. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall have the
power to examine such records at reasonable times and without
unreasonable interference with the business of the seller, for
the purpose of administering and enforcing the provisions of this
article and to make copies of all or any parts thereon.
3
~~
Sec. 21-155. Advertising payment or absorption of tax prohib-
ited.
No seller shall advertise or hold out to the public in
any manner, directly or indirectly, that all or any part of the
tax imposed under this article will be paid or absorbed by the
seller or anyone else, or that the seller or anyone else will
relieve the purchaser of the payment of all or any part of the
tax.
Sec. 21-156. Tips and service charges.
Where a purchaser provides a tip for an employee of a
seller., and the amount of the ti.p is wholly in the discretion of
the purchaser, the ti.p is not subject to the tax imposed by this
article, whether paid in cash to the employee or added to the
bil:L and charged to the purchaser's account, provided, i.n the
latter case, the full amount of the tip is turned over to tree
employee by the seller.
An amount or percent, whether designated as a tip or a
service charge, that is added to the price of the meal by the
seller, and required to be paid by the purchaser, is a part of
the selling price of the meal and is subject to the tax imposed
by this article.
Sec. 21-157. Duty of seller when going out of business.
Whenever any seller required to collect any pay to the
County a tax under this article shall cease to operate or other-
wise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article
shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall_
immediately make a report and pay the tax due.
Sec. 21-158. Discount.
For the purpose of compensating sellers for the col.lec-
tion of the tax imposed by this article, every seller shall be
a:Ll_owed three (3) percent of the amount of the tax due and ac-
counted for in the form of a deduction on his monthly return;
provided, the amount due is not delinquent at the time of pay-
ment.
Sec. 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue.
The Commissioner of_ the Revenue shall promulgate ru]_es
and regulations for the interpretation, administra-lion and en-
forcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Com-
missioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller
liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who
fails, refuses or neglects to co.l.lect such tax or to make the
reports and remittances required by this article. The Commis-
sioner of the Revenue shall have all of the enforcement powers as
4
f-1- /
authorized by Article 1, Chapter 3l. of Title 58.1 of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended, for purposes of this Article.
Sec. 21-160. Procedure upon failure to collect, report, etc.
If any seller, whose duty it is to do so shall fail or
r_e.f_use to collect the tax imposed under. this article and to make,
within the time provided in this article, the reports and remit-
tances mentioned in this article, the Commissioner of the Revenue
shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts
and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As
soon as the Commissioner of the Revenue shall procure such facts
and information as he is able to obtain upon which to base the
assessment of any tax payable by any seller who has failed or
refused to collect such tax and to make such report and remit-
tance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such
seller the tax and penalties provided for by this article anal
shall notify such seller, by registered mail sent to his ]_ast
known place of address, of the total amount of such tax and penal-
ties and the total amount thereof shall be payable within ten
(10) days from the date such notice is sent.
Sec. 21-161. Duty of County Treasurer.
The Treasurer shall have the power and the duty of
collecting the taxes imposed and levied hereunder and shall cause
the same to be paid into the general treasury for the County.
Sec. 21-162. Penalty of late remittance or false return.
(a) If any seller whose duty it is to do so shall fail
or refuse to file any report required by this article or to remit
to the County Treasurer the tax required to be collected and paid
under this article within the time and in the amount specified
in this article, there shall be added to such tax by the County
Treasurer a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the fail-
ure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten
(10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional.
thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure
continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggre-
gate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00).
(b) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with
intent to defraud the County of any tax due under this article, a
penalty of fifty (50) percent of the tax shall be assessed
against the person required to collect such tax.
Sec. 21-163. Violations of article.
Any person vi.ol.ating, failing, refusing or neglecting
to comply with any provision of this article shall be guilty of a
Class 3 misdemeanor. Conviction of such vio]_ation shall not
relieve any person from the payment, collection or remittance of
the taxes provided for in this article. Any agreement by any
5
~- f
person to pay the taxes provided for in this article by a series
of installment payments shall not relieve any person of criminal
liability for violation of this article until the full amount of
taxes agreed to be paid by such person is received by the ~l'rea-
surer. Each failure, refusal, neglect or violation, and each
day's continuance thereof, shall constitute a separate offense.
Sec. 21-164. Exemptions.
The following purchases of food shall not be subject to
the tax under this article:
(a) Food furnished by restaurants to employees as part
of their compensation when no charge is made to
the employee.
(b) Food sold by non-profit day care centers, public
or private elementary or secondary schools or food
sold by any college or university to its students
or employees.
(c) Food for use or consumption by the Commonwealth,
any political subdivision of the Commonwealth or
the United States.
(d) Food furnished by a hospital, medical clinic, con-
valescent home, nursing home, home for the aged,
infirm or handicapped or other extended care facil-
ity to patients or residents thereof.
(e) Food Furnished by a non-profit charitable organiza-
tion to elderly, infirm, handicapped or needy per-
sons in their homes or at central locations.
(f) Food sold by a non-profit educational, charitable
or benevolent organization on an occasional basis
as a fund-raising activity or food sold by a
church or religious body on an occasional basis.
(g) Any other sale of food which is exempt from taxa-
tion under the Virginia Retail Sales and Use Tax
Act, or administrative rules and regulations
issued pursuant thereto.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect on and after July 1, 1988.
6
1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION N0. 51088-9 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for May 10, 1988, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meetings - February 9, 1988, February
23, 1988
2. Request for acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle into the VDOT Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Haven's Trail into the
VDOT Secondary System.
4. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Fifth Planning District Commission, the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission, and Total Action
Against Poverty Board of Directors.
5. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
6. Resolution of approval from the Planning
Commission for proposed park development in the
Hollins Project area.
7. Authorization to enter into an agreement for use
and maintenance of private road.
8. Acknowledgment from VDOT of the acceptance of 0.06
miles of Old Manor Drive and 0.11 miles of Old
Manor Court 0.13 miles of Branderwood Drive, 0.11
miles of Whipplewood Drive, 0.45 miles of
Summerset Drive and 0.07 miles of Summerset Circle
into VDOT Secondary System.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTS
~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/12/88
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Gardner Smith, Director of General Services
r
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION 51088-9.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FRESH MEADOW LANE AND CLOVERLEAF CIRCLE INTO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD
SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fresh Meadow Lane
and Cloverleaf Circle to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50> foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Beverly Heights
North, Section 4 and North Meadows, Section 1, which maps
were recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 264 and Plat Book 10, Page 36
respectively, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 28, 1983 and
December 15, 1986, respectively, and that by reason of the
recordation of said maps no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle, which are shown on a certain sketch
accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
established as public roads to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
~~, ~/.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/13/88
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspection
Virginia Department of Transportation
2
ITEM NUMBER ~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and Cloverleaf Circle
into the Virginia Department of Transportation and Secondary
System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Landmark Properties, Inc. the developer of North Meadow,
Section One requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a
resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of
Transportation accept 0.18 miles of Fresh Meadow Lane and 0.05
miles of Cloverleaf Circle.
The staff has inspected these
representatives of the Virginia Department
found the roads to be acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
roads along with
of Transportation and
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution
requesting that VDOT accept Fresh Meadow Lane and Cloverleaf
Circle into the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
~~
Phillip T. Henry, P E. Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Engineering County Administrator
~-~ z
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION VOTE
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
No Yes Abs
2
,{ ) -~, ~,
NORTH
-_
3>s•-
8 qc
8/
X00 4 22 .
qc 4qc 9
• 8
v ~,
_ 3 ,
Jam. 1h 6 ps •
B y h~
v s~ ~. ~p n~ ..„~
~ a ~~ 65 v9 J'
`n0 ip 9 S~ \,`0 ~ 9
v
/ gg O • ;'[ Q • 9 / .I,a s3 J s~ v 60 q3 ?/S,
O, `'
O nserf q ~ ;a ;,a9 ~ 0 207.69
tJ G
100 0~ ~ a 232 34 ~~
• Fresh Meadow La. g •933
r 236.08
6z Iss33a ,9~
3 6 , • n' '!~ ~/, ~ 222.34 •` ? i
193 / 4.g 3.7 ~ 241.04 /b-~ 3 8 115 2.12 111 ~ 8~7 I•Ga 2.7 ~ O 2.7 BZ ~8O\OJ 2.7 ~ 204. ~~ /
1.2 193.54 238.56 / 117.38 110.77 86 a1 75 .• 75 0 15583 1
s 1986 6.)7~ 9 m
s 3 „ U a' X65 ~ 6 S v ~f3 ~ / ~, ~ BN
'/137, .v 169.x9 ~0a oe a~ s~ m S/NwSO _' 7.9 _~_=~~m m O ., t /
6 • ~ 152.41 ~ ~
0 -24.5 /fib ~YS .~ -V v' • `i, • b,mu • Wt.~ • t!'~ • u ~ 1
V 3v ~ 63 ^ ~ Sl • ~' 36.69 i m 33.2`7 frl ~ N v
3 9 • 32.31 75 "'75 65 ~ ~
~ Ci/S. •~ ~ 145.21 ~ / j0 ~ 4 m ~^' ~
?p `S°/p w . ° 6~ ~~ P 9 ~sS
~ 8 6~~
~ 2Ci23 ? ~ ~ • ~ m ~ 95 1C g6.59 80 •• 80 75.31 ~ m ~p 3
.a ~ O r, 7 ~ 4, 66 11.5 _ _ _ 38.62 ~ g la 59 u
cn ~ /9 ~"O . ~' ~ c /.S 1° ~ ~ cd~ ~ ~ ~/ `r 2 m ~ 4 u' S J ya' Q" o ~ ,% ~ 3 7 E
~ ~~. ~ G96 6/ rye 11 ~' Sv ~ > 0`L ~JS9 r' `r' ~ 5 Sa.i. ~:~ m80.23~ 94 12.87 `~ ~Z'~ `3' ~, S'
,e ,Sp 6, a ~0 553 ~\a ~/ ~S? ?9 .,~ h ti~ Q~ `r 3~ / 7514 80.23 752 . 12g. BO
'3/ `~O _/3 P V ~~~'Ln vm S~•3E ~~p ,o~,'\S9~r45 y ~ D ~ nSC m// q p`' • ~h i
~.m 'Sj 4~ w~ titi oSg ~ 8 ' ~^ ~ 39<~ • °~ s0 S ~ ~ ° . o~ jog
~ 2p 6e o-~ s; o ,' 6 e 235a 1 a97g ~\ 65
,''15p•23i..~ 52.6 ~ i04~o ~ ~ ~~6 ~o `~~ 2 ao09 ` 75 ~ 22 ~. c a RQ
29 ~, op Si Iv °~3 ~~•~ ~ ^e ~., , S 6g° Road 2 .~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ =~ ~ ,5 ,Pod
• ~ m N /5p 75.03 70.23 ~`. ~~'n ~a~i t1E~ •~ ,' ~ tF
~ `~ A.
?8 ~~, .~33 ~; 3 .3 ~36 T .~ ~S ~~ ` 8 / n~ ~ 5 /8 _ /9 •0 ~ ~, ~ . 2f, ~
i06 cf m ° ~ ~•~ `S w ~'" r5y 3 ~ ~ /~` :r ' m ./ ~ c'n s c .
•2 3 a, ti ;
>? cn 32 ~SF 7 7 E 101 61 7 ~ 'i' `', S' Cl o / "~`.S `~ !S' ~ ',0 ~ , , ~ S 2, . < -~ :- t,
,~ , m 8325 115.9 o / ~ S ~: `~ i`l ~C' lrr. i„66 r 'o ,.
6 ~. c
Acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
COMMUNITY SERVICES Cloverleaf Circle
& DEVELOPMENT
3
~J
"+c
8
NORTH
8~
/g
/p~•
qc•
Se
/ 4g 03 ~A
`/00" /nserf
q
3~s~
qc
22.
• 4qc 98
i ~~h• B ~ O6,
B 9, h1
7 .y ~. ~ D 9 ~ .. ~~
• ~ p fir. 05 99
• • `n0 i° 9 J v,~0
~, ~ 9 99
- • n o 9 9 / ~p s~ °~ s ~ 9 69 s~ J~/S
. ~ 90 /~9 v s ~6 n~ v j
. ~ ~ J
-~ ~ ~
-' ~a09 0 207.69
• o `~ 9/~ m A 9 ,~
..•• ~ 3 • P m ^~ 7 Q I
100 a0 W a 232.34 ~~
• ~ Fresh Meadow La. g •933
3 ~ 236.08 i
sz Iss a,,?~ _ • 9 ~
3c 6s ~ ~ /~~ (`1'C1~ O• ~2 ~~3 222.34 ~ 2
193 / 4,5 3.7 ~ 241.04 / J 3 8 115 2.12 IILaB gZg7 LGq 2.7 ~ 5 2.7 B2 X8090 2.7 0 204.9,
1.2 193.54 238.56 / 117.38 110.77 8641 75 •• 75 0 15583 1
~ 19.86 _6,T7~ 9 , m / 9 m
`,/ 3/~ ~ ' ~ • 6A ti Ig38 J 6 S `•7 n.3 ? / m O N
137.~J :.~ 169.49 7 m ui a0 ~~ a' ~J~ m ~ ~'' w~ :.~ 7 u~~ ~ a~+ .1 ~ /
0 - 24.5 /I b ti 'SA O v~ • n • D N W w • v ~ • ~., - 132.41 1
v Jp r 63 ~ ~ } • ~ J 36.E9 i ~ 33.27 fTl v ('1, ~~„ "
o, ~.~ 34 ~ • q 6 • 10 z.3t T5 75 65 ~ • p u ~~
/. 145.21 q ~ _
` °~ `^ ~ ~~ D r ~ I
20 s% ~ 62 /O m 9 ~JS ~ W 8 E o
O ~ m • 'jC'BS 10 6 S9 80
\~' 2~ 7 v ~ "'~VJ g 80 7 5.31 G m ~n 3
-0 ~ SO ?si 7 ~ `L e6 11.5 - ~7 _ _ 3962 O g la 59 ~"
o ~ ,<, a •~~ = 42 m 43 g4 p 4S m 46 ~ o s
<n 3~• "' uti ~~ 01 `_ 1j ~ i S6 o- ti ~JJ • °ir • i, • m .~ j 9 4 .3 W • ,}~ F
9 i 0 ~ 5 Say • ~~%' 7 12.87 2h S
i Qs 6 ~`L~ / 5 ? ~ '. ^~ 6, s 3~ 80.23 , BO ~ e,
S a, y S ~ / •`2 9 r' +~ ti ~. s 4 ~ 7514 8023 ~F.
7 /.4 °O) ~ ~ ,~ /c •523 PyP ~ i~ ~ ' ~j ~S V ~P6 "59 .5 a5 y~ 7S 2 ,~_ / ~ 6 c~
3~ /3 ~ ~~~,Lt ^V v 0p X36 `~ ~~ • 593 S ti ~ 3 ~ n ~~ ~, ~ 9 U~ • ,~"~
,{ n n . s v~ ~ ~h ~` 6,p • c 3c 7L 1"O x,15, i
,'.5 v-0 `r S ~OBg r c-~ Ta p0 :i 6 a 2354 1 45 79 65
3p ~ ' ~ ~ ` ~ `' ~ .~~ '
~ 75 ,C~
O 23/v~., 2.6 1 10404 ~ >U /1' 26 ~o it 02 ao09 ~ ~ZZ ~. t~ ~T"O
29 ~ W n l S I ~ V e r 33 ec., ~ ^0 ,.% > 6J 6g R ~ ~ d c ~. l e, "" ~' >S POQI
b J ~ ~ ~? `~~.~~ r
2• o N 150. ` 75.03 70.23 c' v ~u~ ' . ,7 F' ^ ~ `F
• 8 ~?, .~33 ~~ 34 ~ 3S X36 ~ mss. ~~~ ~ 8 ,~ Ai ~ ~ ~8 ~g `<N .~ ~ ~/ r~ 2~_~: 2
> l) i
~? `^ 3^ ~.SF 7761 IOI 61 11? ' `"~, 'S o '`S /y 9 ~,0~~ r , 7S :r
c / z, ~ 6 ~ . ` `~ r,
,~ rn 8325 115.3 7f 'c~ 9 / < ~ ?,: ~`l~ r_ S6 .r 'o ,, ..
.%`, ~~ ~
COMMUNITY SERVICES
& DEVELOPMENT
Acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle
3
-,.
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY ld, 1988
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FRESH MEADOW LANE AND CLOVERLEAF CIRCLE INTO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD
SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fresh Meadow Lane
and Cloverleaf Circle to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Beverly Heights
North, Section 4 and North Meadows, Section 1, which maps
were recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 264 and Plat Book 10, Page 36
respectively, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 28, 1983 and
December 15, 1986, respectively, and that by reason of the
recordation of said maps no report from a Board~of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
4
,.-~
3. That said roads known as Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle, which are shown on a certain sketch
accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
established as public roads to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
5
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
-° -~,
n " ~~O
r ~.
~o
~' < ~~i
m p
~ O
r p
IFS ~'
ti
MEgDOW LANE ~
D RT. 1129
v
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN WHITE
DESCRIPTION: (1) Fresh Meadow Lane From Intersection with
Elderwood Road (Rt. 1129) to the Dead End.
(2) Cloverdale Circle From Intersection with
Fresh Meadow Lane to Dead End.
LENGTH: (1) 0.18 miles (2) 0.05 Miles
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: (1) 50 Feet (2) 50 Feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 Feet (2) 30 Feet
SERVICE WIDTH: (1) 26 Feet (2) 26 Feet
SERVICE: (1) 7 Homes (2) 3 Homes
IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY:
RESIDENT ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION:
6
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION 51088-9.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HAVEN'S TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Haven's Trail,
from it's intersection with Route 864 to the terminus at the
cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.08 mile, to be accepted and made a
part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section
33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty ( 50 ) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Buckhorn Meadows
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 52, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on April 13, 1987 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Haven's Trail and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
...J~
Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/13/88
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspection
Virginia Department of Transportation
2
L
ITEM NUMBER=~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Haven's Trail into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Ron Testerman, Inc., the developer of Buckhorn Meadows,
requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to
the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they
accept 0.08 miles of Haven's Trail, from it's intersection with
Route 864 to the terminus at the cul-de-sac.
The staff has inspected this road along with representatives
of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Haven's Trail, from it's
intersection with Route 864 to the terminus at the cul-de-sac,
into the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
%~Z~~
Phillip Henry, .E.
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
~c //~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
~~- ~
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
2
NORTN
COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of Haven's Trail
& DEVELOPMENT 3
~`
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HAVEN'S TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Haven's Trail,
from it's intersection with Route 864 to the terminus at the
cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.08 mile, to be accepted and made a
part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section
33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Buckhorn Meadows
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 52, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on April 13, 1987 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Haven's Trail and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
a
f ~Y'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION N0. APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for May 10, 1988, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meetings - February 9, 1988, February
23, 1988
2. Request for acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle into the VDOT Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Haven's Trail into the
VDOT Secondary System.
4. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Fifth Planning District Commission, the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission, and Total Action
Against Poverty Board of Directors.
5. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
6. Resolution of approval from the Planning
Commission for proposed park development in the
Hollins Project area.
7. Authorization to enter into an agreement for use
and maintenance of private road.
8.. Acknowledgment from VDOT of the acceptance of 0.06
miles of Old Manor Drive and 0.11 miles of Old
Manor Court 0.13 miles of Branderwood Drive, 0.11
miles of Whipplewood Drive, 0.45 miles of
• P • ~~
t
r~
Summerset Drive and 0.07 miles of Summerset Circle
into VDOT Secondary System.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
I
i
A-51088-9.c
ITEM NUMBER f~- ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Fifth Planning District Commission•
Supervisor McGraw has nominated John
unexpired term of Timothy Gubala as
member of the Executive Committee.
1989.
Industrial Development Authority
Hubbard to fill the
citizen representative and
His term will expire June 30,
Supervisor Nickens nominated William Triplett to serve another
four-year term. His term will expire September 26, 1991.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission•
Supervisor Robers nominated Vince Joyce to fill the unexpired
term of Leonard Winger. His term will expire June 30, 1989.
Supervisor McGraw nominated Roger Smith to fill the unexpired
term of Michael Lazzuri. His term will expire June 30, 1990.
Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors•
Supervisor Nickens nominated Elizabeth Stokes and Cabell Brand to
another two-year term. Their terms will expire May 5, 1990. Mr.
Brand is a joint appointee with the City of Salem.
~'
1--~' _ : d
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H, llen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
(~C /Y
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( X) Motion by : ~~~~TC . N~e~rre~~eb-L • Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Fifth Planning District File
Industrial Development Authority File
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission File
Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors File
POAN0,1.
OF F
~ ,~
Z
z
J a
/x~
18
SFS ~ 150
TERRS $$
~P~
QUICENTENN
A Bcauti~ulBe~innin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~n~tn~,~ of ~uttnuhP
May 17, 1988
Mr. John R. Hubbard
Assistant County Administrator
Roanoke County
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear John:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
appoint you as citizen representative and member of the Executive
Committee of the Fifth Planning District Commission to fill the
unexpired three-year term of Timothy W. Gubala. This term will
expire on June 30, 1989.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
oJ~ -
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Wayne Strickland
Fifth Planning District Commission
145 West Campbell Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia 24010
P.O. BOX 29800 ROAfJOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
O~ ROANp~~
~
J
` Z ~~~~~' ~~ /DIY ~~~
a i
V
~J
18 8 Eso - 88
P~'
S
FSQUICENTENN~
~1 8cauri/ull3cgimting BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
1NINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RIC HARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
May 17 p p
19 8 8 CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
, HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Timothy W. Gubala
Director, Economic Development
Roanoke County
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Tim:
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Fifth
Planning District Commission. Allow me to personally thank you
for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to
the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves
and their time are indeed all too scarce.
Very truly yours
y12a..~, ,~ . .~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
cc: Mr. Wayne Strickland
Fifth Planning District Commission
145 West Campbell Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia 24010
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018 07Q8 (703) 772-2004
O
H
O
H
Q ~
w
3
W x
H
w H
H
Q
Q
O ~-.
x
~,,
>-~' O
w
z x
H
0
~
U
~
~
~ Z
~
O
U
w
~ ~
~
~
w
w
~ w
~
~
w
~
z
cri
w
N
~
~
o
z
O
~ ~
~
o
~
O z
Q
Q
~ o
~,
~
O
w u
~
H
Z
~
w
~ ~
N ~
~ r~
w
~
~
~
w
U ~
U
w
x ~,
~
U
w w
~
~ U
z
~
~ ~,
O
E--~ ~,
w
U ~
o
~
z
Q
z
0
v
~, Q
~w
~ ~
N Q
x
Q
0
H
~~ ~
U
OF POANp~~
~ ~
~. .p
Z
~ 2
°~ a
i$ E50 ~ $$
SFSQUICENTENN~Py
A Beauti~ul8eginnin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(~n~t~tf~ n~ ~ntt~tu~e
May 17, 1988
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Bill Triplett
324 Washington AVenue
Vinton, Virginia 24179
Dear Mr. Triplett:
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Industrial Development Authority. Citizens so responsive
to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves
and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of Industsrial Development Authority
for a four-year term. Your term will expire on September 26,
1991.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you
a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been
amended by the 1987 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and
a copy of each amendment is attached.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Charles R. Saul, Chairman
Edward A. Nutt, Secretary
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
OF ROANp,Y~
~ ~
ti 9
2 4~
7 2
J a
p 150
1$ renns ~~
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul6eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. Vince Joyce
6039 Marshwren Lane, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Joyce:
May 17, 1988
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
appoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory
Commission to complete the unexpired three-year term of Leonard
J. Winger. This term will expire June 30, 1989.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Steve Carpenter, Director
Parks & Recreation Department
C~n~tnt~ of ~nttnoke
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
OF ROANp~.~
~ ,~
°.i a
1$ E50 $$
SFgQU1CENTENN~P~'
A Beautiful Be~innin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. Leonard J. Winger
3319 G Circle Brook Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Winger:
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS M.4G ISTERIAL DISTRICT
May 17 , 19 8 8 STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission. Allow me to personally thank you
for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to
the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves
and their time are indeed all too scarce.
Very truly yours
bjh
~IIllki~~ i1f ~Q~n~t~P
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-079E (703) 772-2004
r
O
[~'
Q
O
F-,
Q
W
H
W
cn
W
w
z
H
3
h
A
z
0
w
a
W
Q
o
~
~
U
~
~
~ ~
x
~,
~
H
Z
~
~
U
w
~ O
w~
zO
~
~ w
~ ~
~ ~
ww
w~
~ Z
~
w
t~
H
,O
w
z
O
~ Z
~
~
w
O Z
Q
Q
~ O
~
~
O
w U
~
~'
Q
z
U
~
~ v'
W
N ~
~
w
cx
~ H
Z
O
~
w
U U
w
x ~,
~
~
w w
z
~ U
z ~ ~, ~
~
Z o
E-~ w
U o
?~
z
Q
0
o Q
,~ W
.Q
N Q
a ~''~~
:ti
Q-
x
Q
H
\J ~
O~ POANp~~
P ~
ti p
Z ~
~ 2
a
8~8 E50 $$ `
SESQUICENTENN~P~
rl Beauti~ul8e~innin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
May 17, 1988
Mr. Roger Smith
Route 1, Box 186
Catawba, Virginia 24070
Dear Mr. Smith:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C.NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
appoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory
Commission to complete the unexpired three-year term of Michael
Lazzuri. This term will expire June 30, 1990.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Steve Carpenter, Director
Parks & Recreation Department
(~n~tn~~ of ~n~tnake
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004
i
O~ ROANp~~
ti •~
Z ~~
J a?
8 E50 $$ i
S~SQVICENTENN~P~
A Beauti ful Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. Michael Lazzuri
5812 Knowles Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Lazzuri:
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
May 1 7 , 19 8 8 BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission. Allow me to personally thank you
for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to
the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves
and their time are indeed all too scarce.
Very truly yours
bjh
C~nixnt~ v~ ~uttn~k~e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.1~~ -
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROAIVOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
r
O
H
Q
W
W
W
n~
n
H
a
N
N
a
a
W
RI
U
H
w
/'~
Q -~--i
~ O
w E--~
o
~
~
W
u
~ u
~
~
~
o
w
o zo
~
~ w
~ ~
wx
w ~
~z
z
N
~
~
O
o z
~
O
~
O z
Q
Q
Q o
cn
O
W u
cn
z
~
U
~
w `n
w ~
U, x
~
~
~- E
-~
~
O
~
w ~
U
w w
~,
U -
w
Z
~ U
U w
~ ~ ~ ~
~Ow O
E"''
Q
CJ~
~--.
~¢
0
01
e-~
N
Q
Q
Q
x
Q
H
z
u
d~
O~ ROANpt.~
~ ,I• G
~.
Z ~~
~ 2
J a
/x~ ~ 150 .
1 V YENS $8
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A /jeauti~ul8e~innin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~vixn~~ of ~vttnnk~e
May 17, 1988
Mrs. Elizabeth
Roanoke County
Roanoke County
Salem, Virginia
W. Stokes, Clerk
Circuit Court
Courthouse
24153
Dear Mrs. Stokes:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Board of Directors of Total Action Against Poverty.
Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and
willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too
scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of the Board of Directors of Total
Action Against Poverty for a two-year term. Your term will
expire on May 5, 1990.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Theodore J. Edlich, III, Executive Director of TAP
P. O. Box 2868, Roanoke, Virginia 24001
Ms. Joyce Bailey, Deputy Clerk, City of Salem
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004
~F ~10ANp~,~
~ F
~.
Z ~~
°~ a
~ 8 E5o 88
SFSOUICENTENN~P~'
A Beauti jul Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
May 17, 1988
Mr. E. Cabell Brand, President
Stuart McGuire Company, Inc.
115 Brand Road
Salem, Virginia 24153
Dear Mr. Brand:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS M.4GISTE RIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Board of Directors of Total Action Against Poverty.
Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and
willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too
scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of the Board of Directors of Total
Action Against Poverty for a two-year term. Your term will
expire on May 5, 1990. As you are aware, this is a joint
appointment with the City of Salem.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Theodore J. Edlich, III, Executive Director of TAP
P. 0. Box 2868, Roanoke, Virginia 24001
Ms. Joyce Bailey, Deputy Clerk, City of Salem
C~nixnt~ of ~vttrt~ake
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004
TAP
Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 702 Shenandoah Avenue, N. 1N., P. 0. Box 2868, Roanoke, Virginia 24001
TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY
BOARD REPRESENTATION
GOVERNING BODIES
Name of Governing Body Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Mailing Address _ P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Tel. No. 772-2005
Chairman of the Board/M~~~rx wee Garrett
County Administrator/C~~fafl~~lx Elmer C. xodge
Date of Meeting Tuesday, May 10, 1988
Board/Council member selected
Address
Tel. No.
Permanent Representative (If any) Elizabeth w. Stokes
Clerk of Circuit our
Address Roanoke County Courthouse Tel. No. 387-6205
irginia .
Permanent Representative - appointed jointly with City of Salem:
Ac1~ E. Cabe 1 Brand, Pre~i dent
Stuart McGuire Co., Inc.
Address 115 Brand Road Tel . No .
Salem, Virginia 24153
Si ned: ~~~'~~
9
~q{rx/ Chairman
5-20-88
cc: Mrs. Stokes
Mr. Brand
Original to TAP
File
Deputy Clerk, Salem
..~•4 ~..
`'~.
i
~:
h ~ c'.
1 ~
Y y' 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION 51088-9.d
AUTHORIZING THE CLEAN
VALLEY COUNCIL TO APPLY FOR
AN ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM
GRANT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to
combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt
County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and
cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by
the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control
and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1989; and
2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter
program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1989 which shall
represent said program for all localities named in this
resolution; and
3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant,
and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and
completion of the program; and
4. That the Board further accepts responsibility
jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of
Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for
all phases of the pru~ram; and
Y ~
5. That said funds when received will be transferred
immediately to Clean Valley Council, Inc; all funds will be used
in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its
endorsement and support; and
6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council,
Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the Assistant
County Administrator of Management Services and such data shall
be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the
County; and
7. That the Board requests the Department of
Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling
to consider and approve the application and program, said program
being in accord with the regulations governing use and
expenditure of said funds.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTS
~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/12/88
CC: File
Clean Valley Council
Clean Valley Council File
Clerk, Roanoke City Council
Clerk, Salem City Council
Clerk, Town of V_riton
Clerk, Botetourt County
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER K"5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution requesting approval of a grant
application for Clean Valley Council
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Each year Roanoke County receives a request from the Clean Valley
Council for adoption of a resolution designating the Clean Valley
Council as the agency to handle litter control for Roanoke
County, as well as the cities of Roanoke and Salem, the Town of
Vinton, and Botetourt County. This resolution is necessary to
apply for grant funds for operation of the program. All
participating localities must pass similar resolutions by May 16,
1988 to allow the grant application to be sent to the State
Division of Litter Control and Recycling.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution authorizing
Clean Valley Council as the designated agency to handle litter
control for Roanoke County, and requesting approval of the grant
application.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
~ ~ ~ fd
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
ACTION
Motion by: _
VOTE
Yes No Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL TO
APPLY FOR AN ANTI-LITTER
PROGRAM GRANT FOR ROANOKE
COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to
combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt
County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and
cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by
the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control
and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1989; and
2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter
program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1989 which shall
represent said program for all localities named in this
resolution; and
3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant,
and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and
completion of the program; and
4. That the Board further accepts responsibility
jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of
Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for
all phases of the program; and
• . ~~~
5. That said funds when received will be transferred
immediately to Clean valley Council, Inc; all funds will be used
in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its
endorsement and support; and
6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council,
Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the Assistant
County Administrator of Management Services and such data shall
be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the
County; and
7. That the Board requests the Department of
Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling
to consider and approve the application and program, said program
being in accord with the regulations governing use and
expenditure of said funds.
OF POANp,Y~
a N
ti~ p
Z
~ 2
J ,~. a
- 18~' Eso 88
SFSQVICENTENN~PV
A Benuti~ul Be~innin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~u~tn~~ of ~~~tnvkr
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 16, 1988
Ms. Kelly Whitney
Executive Director
Clean Valley Council
P. 0. Box 3320
Roanoke, Virginia 24015-1320
Dear Ms. Whitney:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 51088-9.d authorizing
the Clean Valley Council to apply for an anti-litter program
grant for Roanoke County. This resolution was adopted by the
Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 10, 1988.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke~County Board of Supervisors
Attachment
cc: Clerk, Roanoke City Council
Clerk, Salem City Council
Clerk, Town of Vinton
Clerk, Botetourt County
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004
A-51088-9.e
ITEM NUMBER `~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Review of Proposed Park Development
within the Hollins Community Development Project area in accordance
with § 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia, as Amended
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
§ 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires
that the general location, characteristics and extent of public
areas, building, or structures be submitted to the Planning
Commission for its approval as being substantially in accordance
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to this section, the
Planning Commission reviewed the acquisition of an approximate 3.5
acre tract from Esther B. Sadler for the development of a community
park within the Hollins Community Development Project area.
The Hollins Community Development program activities consisting of
highway improvements, water and sewer line installation, residential
rehabilitation, and park development were considered by the Planning
Commission at its October 1, 1985 meeting.
Attached is a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission express-
ing its approval of the purchase and the compatibility of the
location with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. A vicinity map
is attached as well.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Hollins Community Development Project budget includes the funds
for acquiring property and developing a public park. The
acquisition cost is $9,000. The park development cost will be
approximately $39,000. Additional nominal costs and time will be
required to maintain the park. An accurate cost for maintenance
cannot be determined until completion of final design of the park.
The park will be designed to be as maintenance free as is possible.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends
approval from the
SUBMITTED BY:
~~.
Rob Stal er
Director of Plann:
------------------
the Board of Supervisors accept this resolution of
Planning Commission.
APPROVED•
~/ ~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
Lng County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) cc: File, Rob Stalzer, Johnson x
Referred Steve Carpenter, McGraw x
To Diane Hyatt, Reta Bus er Nickens x
Robers x
~ ) _ ~ i,. t~.~'
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Roanoke County Planning Commission
FROM: Rob Stalzer ~+
DATE: March 28, 1988
SUBJECT: § 15.1-456 Review
As you are aware, § 15.1-456 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, requires that the location, characteristics and extent of
public areas, buildings, or structures be submitted to the Planning
Commission for its review as being substantially in accordance with
the adopted Comprehensive Plan. In light of this requirement, I
request that you review the acquisition of an approximate 3.5 acre
tract from Esther B. Sadler for the development of a park for the
Hollins Community Development Project. The property is located on
the west side of State Route 1905, immediately south of its
intersection with State Route 648 in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
The Hollins Community Development Project budget includes the funds
for acquiring property and developing a public park. The
acquisition cost is $9,000. The park development cost will be
approximately $39,000. Additional nominal costs and time will be
required to maintain the park. An accurate cost for maintenance
cannot be determined until completion of final design of the park.
The park will be designed to be as maintenance free as is possible.
A location map and draft resolution are attached for your review.
ajb
Attachment
ffi
'""' L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, requires Planning Commission review of the location,
characteristics, and extent of public areas, buildings, or
structures for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke currently desires to
purchase an approximate 3.5 acre tract near the intersection of
Routes 1905 and 648 in the Hollins Magisterial District in order to
develop a park within the Hollins Community Development Project; and
WHEREAS, the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt made
successful application for monies from the Virginia Department of
Housing and Community Development in August, 1985, for the purposes
of rehabilitating existing housing, reconstructing roads, installing
sewer and water facilities, and developing a community park; and
WHEREAS, the approximate 3.5 acre tract is appropriately
located within the Hollins Community Project Area in order to
provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Planning Commission recommends approval of the acquisition of the
approximate 3.5 acre tract in order to develop a public park.
FURTHER, the Roanoke County Planning Commission is
appreciative of the opportunity to review this acquisition.
vote:
Rob Staler, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
On motion of Carolyn Flippen and the following recorded
AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Ca
NORTH
Hollins Community Development Project
PUBLIC FACILITIES Sadler Park
ACTION NUMBER A-51088-9.f
ITEM NUMBER~'"~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to enter into an agreement for use
and maintenance of a private road owned by Maynard
and Trucilla Heslep
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS•
BACKGROUND•
For twelve years, Roanoke County has used a private road owned
and maintained by Maynard and Trucilla Heslep to gain access to a
well lot owned by the County. This road has been maintained by
the owner who is now requesting assistance in the maintenance.
After several meetings with Mr. Heslep, the County Attorney's
office has come to an agreement with the Heslep's which would
allow continued use of the private road by the County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The attached agreement has been
have indicated their willingness
will employ a contractor to tar
road, after which the County and
maintenance. There is a bridge
stipulates that the bridge will
it is damaged by the County. In
both the County and the Hesleps
restoring the bridge.
reviewed by the Hesleps and they
to participate. Roanoke County
and chip the aforesaid private
the Hesleps will share in the
on the road, and the agreement
be maintained by the owner unless
the event of a natural disaster,
will share in the cost of
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
Alternative #1: Authorize the County Administrator the enter
into the agreement setting forth the provisions for use and
maintenance of the private road. This will ensure continued
access to a County owned well lot.
~` ~
Alternative #2: Do not authorize the County Administrator to
entire into the agreement with Maynard and Trucilla Heslep.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend Alternative #1.
Cf~~^'
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob L. Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Johnson to approve Alternative Garrett ~
Received ( ) #1 Johnson ~
Referred McGraw ~
To• Nickens ~_
Robers ~
cc: File
Phil Henry
Cliff Craig
Paul Mahoney
~~ ~~
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of
1988, by and between MAYNARD HESLEP and TRUCILLA G. HESLEP, husband and
wife, parties of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County
Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part.
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the parties of the first part are the owners of the following
described tract of land lying and being situate in the Windsor Hills Magis-
terial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
Parcel A and B totaling 2.5 acres - Cravins Creek
conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed dated November 21, 1979,
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Vir-
ginia, in Deed Book 1135, page 532 and being more particularly designated
as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 67.13-2-3; and
WHEREAS, together with this conveyance the parties of the first part
have the right to use the private road leading from the property herein-
above described, said road being in an easterly direction to Route 685; and
WHEREAS, the parties of the first part and the party of the second
part desire to enter and bind themselves for the repair and maintenance of
the aforesaid private road.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and the mutual cove-
nants contained therein, the parties of the first part and the party of the
second part agree as follows:
1. The parties of the first part hereby grant unto the party of the
second part, its heirs and assigns, the right to use the private road lead-
ing from the property hereinabove-described, said road being in an easterly
direction to Route 685.
~~
2. The party of the second part shall employ a contractor to tar and
chip the aforesaid private road.
3. The parties of the first part and the party of the second part
agree to share equally the maintenance of said private road.
4. The parties of the first part have constructed a bridge on said
private road. Both parties agree that the maintenance and upkeep of said
bridge shall be the sole responsibility of the parties of the first part
unless the party of the second part damages the bridge; however, in the
event said bridge is damaged in a natural disaster, both parties shall
agree to equally share in the cost of restoring the bridge in the same con-
dition as it was before said disaster. The parties of the first part, in
its sole discretion, may elect to substantially improve said bridge beyond
its original condition.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, hereby joins
in the execution of this instrument pursuant to Board action by the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at their meeting held on
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
Maynard Heslep
Trucilla G. Heslep
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
By
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved as to form:
Sarah A. Rice, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney
State of Virginia,
County of to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day
of 1988, by Maynard Heslep and Trucilla G. Heslep.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
State of Virginia,
County of to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day
of 1988, by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke
County, VA.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
ACTION NUMBER A-51088-9.g
~,
ITEM NUMBER # °"' ~`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgment from the Va.
Transportation of acceptance
the Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND
Department of
of certain roads into
Attached are letters from Oscar Mabry, Deputy Commission of the
Va. Department of Transportation acknowledging the following
additions to the Secondary System:
0.06 miles of Old Manor Drive, effective April 25, 1988
0.11 miles of Old Manor Court, effective April 25, 1988
0.13 miles of Branderwood Drive, effective April 26, 1988
0.11 miles of Whipplewood Drive, effective April 26, 1988
0.45 miles of Summerset Drive, effective April 26, 1988
0.07 miles of Summerset Circle
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
~~,-'
Mary H. llen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
TO:
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob L.
Johnson
VOTE
Yes No Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phil Henry
John Hubbard
'- y r- JG
. ~ ~~
r, ~~, '~L I ~; r-d
,e~~~-roe
~~~~®IiTV~~~LT'H ~~ V~~~~N~A
IDEPARTMEIVT OF TRAIYSPORTATIOIV
1401 EAST BROAQ STREET
RAY D. PETiiTEL RICHIMOND, 23279
COMMISSIONER Ap r i l 2 5, 19 8 8
Secondary System
Additions
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
OSCAR K. MABRY
DE?UTY COMMISSIONER
As requested in your resolution dated February 23, 1988, the
following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are
hereby approved, effective April 25, 1988.
A T71TTT/V1Tr
LENGTH
PLANTATION ESTATES
Route 1927 (Old Manor Drive) - From Route 1928
to Route 1934. 0.06 Mi.
Route 1934 (Old Manor Court) - From Route 1927
to a North cul-de-sac. 0.11 Mi.
Sincerely,
ryJ
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
~/~ ~
7RA.NSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
~. ~ ~~,
~
°'' ~~ ~ °~~ c~
~.
~'®1~1~®I~T~;~~]L'~'~ ®~' V~~~~I®T~Tt~
QEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST B~10AD STREET
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219
COMMISSIONER A p r i l 2 6, 1 9 8 8
Secondary System
Additions
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24028
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
(~-~
~- ~'
OSCAR K. MARRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
As requested in your resolutions dated August ZZ, 2987 and
October Z3, 1987, the following additions to the Secondary System
of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective April 26, 2988.
LENGTE
BRANDERWOOD - SECTIONS Z, 2, AND 3
Route 1960 (Branderwood Drive) - From Route
679 to Route 2962. 0.13 Mi.
Route 1961 (WhippZewood Drive) - From Route
1960 to Route 2962. 0.11 Mi.
Route 2962 (Summerset Drive) - From Route
1960 to 0.03 mile Northwest of Route 2960. 0.45 Mi.
Route 1963 (Summerset Circle) - From Route
1962 to a Southwest cuZ-de-sac. 0.07 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOf1 THE 21ST CENTI;RY
~-E. - l
COt1NTY OF RgAN~Kf
~ STATE~EN3 C1F EXPEiI<1ITt~fS
NINE iR~tTNS ENDED 1K4RCN 31, 19$8
li`ft..TH 6 SOCIAL SERVICES
~, PSiBLiC NE:ALTH 387,016 290,262 75
StiCIAL SERVICES i~IC3i~'sSTRATDpM 1,728,54°, 1,238,083 78
PF1ES.iC i1SSIS'ff3N£E 826,40fi 549,f1~ fit
~ iNSTITiiTItlNAi_ CARE 4$,x00 l3, 643 28
SOCIAL SERVFCf DRiiRNItATIt~t35 - - 94,984 34,984 100 - - _ _ -
c
DEVEt.f~ENT
SIiPfRltifENDENT OF DEVtittDPRM - - -111,057 - - 77,530 _ _ -70 - __ _ _
RLAFiNiNu" 3 IDNING 271,738 175,003 55
~i1FPD1EtC DEVELDP#~NT $3,573 59, 313 77
_ DEVfLCi~IENT REVFEii _.___ 104,555. 76,1$1 -_.-_ __:73_-____ __ _..
~. - PLAt~iN6 COMMISSION I8, 281 1!,$43 fi5
t CONSTRtjETI{~t Bt1ILDFNB SERVICES 200,280 142,755 li
-ROOD DI SRSTER f IPENS£ ___ _ {~ _ 424 _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _
KON-OEPARTIENTAt
~ '. -_ - .. _ LIIfR~tY-_ ._... - - __ __... -- I,084~51i_ ___ 761,895 ___-_ - __...-.7{S_-----_.- -___ __ _ __ _
,.;
.
. EXTfMlSIOif Z C[ilttiN133Nu^ EF1E#XiTION 35,233 30,098 32
.
, BEPLOYfE $QJf~ITS 754,343 471,838 53
_ CONTRIFitffifAiS Til SERVICE f1Rf3iWFZATION5 _ 20,000... ... 20,000_____. _. 500 _ _
NI SCaS.i~f1135 ~.,6, 524 fi3, 031 1 S
(` ~N __
'itlTi~ ,24.['38.681 _ 15.471.598 - - - fib -
rp
,_: _._- TRANSf~RS AND-RESERVES __ _ - ___ - -_ _.__.. .___ _. _ _.-_ ___ _...._.- .-- --------.-----------._ __-_._ _.
( REFM18tlRSABLE EXDENDITSiRfS
' 0 i, 588
_ .t TRANSFER TO FEES}
SERVICE 3,775,633 2,188,473 58
,, _
7RAtF5FfR TO INTEL SERVICE
_ c54~~1fi3 _
.__..163,853..._._. _
-_ ~..-.-_-_ ___ - _ _._
'. TRAN5FER TO SCHE3(lE. GPERATIN6 Fl1N~} "w,456,000 6,838,198 21
TRAk5ffR TO tffILITY CAPITAL 235,717 7,564 3
TRANSFER T13 f~IRFTAL PRfi3ECTS __ _ 2,7IJT487 2,353;146 --- - -- --87 - - ___ _. -.- _._
~ TRANSFER T4 YOl1iH HAi~EN 72, 233 72, 233 100
TRANSFER TO 6RAtTf F1~tD ~ ~ r 100
tt3AD~OPRIATED ItAS.ANCE 1,423,-133 - _ 0 0 . -
~, R6fRiE P{lR FiOARO CONTiN@ENCY ~ 30,733_ ____~_~~ ~-
TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS x3,37;,512 11,631,056 439
GRAND TiffAL i 58, 272,193 ~ 28,102,fifi4 4$
F.
~irar~iai 5tate+~errts: Page 3
• /~ -r•
._
CQi~ti'3'Y ~ kt3ANERtE -
S'3ATFJlaiT {F EXPE3~ifiE#tES
~ PtIt~ NCiNTHS EKtfD iPARCii 31, 1988
BUDBE~ EXPEMI® x
8E7iERAE ADiiiNlSfikAfilflN _ ~._ -
BQARD {1F SEtFgRViSDRS ~ 147,245 ~ 107,243 73
C£t11~iTY f~IfIfINISfiRAfiCtR i68,6:~8 117,292 70
PER5{II~L 200, 150 244,64b 72 ._ _ _ ___.. .
CGLINT1t RTTOSttE't' 12b, 423 $7, 473 b9
fAMMi551f71~dER i~ REVEKtE
448,704
3x,7,$83
75
fiREASURER 443,542 27b,12i bi _ .. _. __ _--
FlEC'f IOFES 177, 623 113, 293 b4
SESCUICERfiE~IAt 10J,148 43,261 47
FI St'PL ~~
5ilPERI NTEi~iBEi~f ~ f i 9Cft -tAFtAt~Etsf $0, b~C 50, 212 b2
CGE~tfiY A5~5513R 60`i,b40 411,074 6$ - - _ _- _---- --.._ __- :~___
. CfMRAI. ACCUUFEfii~ 351,465 235,481 b7
R(sGF~tflEUENfi 213, 013 150, 245 71
1~gNAt~1~El~tT i Bl1D6ET __.__ 81,303 - _57,102_ _-. _. _.__ _.- .70. __- _ ---~-----_--._- ---._.__ - .-
~ RISti hpt~pENfi 808,380 774,1!8 35
,R1DICiflE. AD1iINi5fiRATIOai
Ci RCUIT COt1R"f 127,287 1 i, b13 3
GEt3fRf1{. DiSfiRICfi COURfi -'~r,UbO S,c36 2I
~41GISfiI~IfiES 363 454 47 _ - _
~ 3 t D Di5'tBICfi CfAtRfi 6,516 2,886 44
k;;;~~~: CiERK {1F CIRCUIfi EX1UR'f 470,081 sft, 2`5 70
_ CaMllt~liEAtfifft 5 AfifiORt~Y - _ 284,105- __ _202, 591-_ ---- --- ___ 71 - --- ----- _ _-- -- - :-. _ _
PRORATii#~i tIFFIC£ x,175 3, 3.13 3
~ VICfiIM itlfitgSS 7,810 f,783 23
PUBS iC S-~ff TY
~ PQtICiN6 6 INVESfi18-'13ING 3,8b5,19~ 2,622,476 b8
Ni6E~AY 9AfETY Cfip~fISSIEAi - 360 _ _ 158 Ib - - ___ __...--.. __.__ _ -.~-___
~ FIRt 1,671,b75 1, 1~8,49u 71
~
RcSCtE 51IUAD 390,3`.A 316,178 $1
fJiER6Et1CY ~RViCES & f~Z ~1i1? RESPCJNSE 34,717 24,236 70 ...
~ tXft~I13Q1Eldfi/CARE GF i~fti9~R5 2,899,308 1,~f3,743 74
fWiilfli. CtiNTRQ! 141,223 9b, 337 b3
P1iB1.iC FACILIiifS
StIPERiKTEbii1EN'f DF T4JIQ_IC fAEiLITIES 113,:'59 58,32tE 52
SIREf 3 Li l~ffi5 ~, 5bb 44, 3b7 45 _
F1~iGit~ERIN6 543,07t} E'93,~7 54
~ BUiLi-It3f3S b SRCtl1NDS 848,481 541,288 fi4
PARRS & RECREfl7I flhS .1, tK33,121 647, 363 65 _
Rifi3SE 1,4b5,718 I,087,8it6 74
PUbL IC 3 RAht5PQRif1fi iDN 66,503 3=.,, t~9 i 5,i
6RfslAJU5 MAINTEi~ANCE 840,`!38 i3b,121 71
:FItt-'~CIi~L 57ATEMEMS: P-~6E 2 DP 3
t ..
i
4
r
j
k
~, ~ ~
w
"~ ~ .~ ~
~ ,
i
' _ ~ I ~
}~~ 1 ~p~ {~~'yn~~p~~iyu~~ ~4~i~o?°a op~~ oyb~i'Fi ~~~oa Q ao yp~~
8 1~ O~ O~ 1"1 11'! y (O N !~ 4y t O ~ l{~I M ~ y N n N ~ 2~jK f'!
'" ~ - " I 'O
!$Y 5w~ Qr y~ gp Qw Qw w ' '~~ I yw~ eq ~y: w ~ ~ w 5+r~ yw Qw y~ '.
8$`~ 2525bt~'52525~~~~°•o.d?Ri~3Z'i~~?ia~~~n o25 0 ~Ka ~4+ ,
~~ ~g~a~g~m~~~~ ~~~~y~~~~w4~F~ ~ ~~
~I i YS i I .
x n~`.~piw~" I~~S~~ ~'~""."$a~nw4~ii~.M~Q.rorno ~ n o i n ',
h n +o ~ r 1 .r
1 +; ~'
~~~4`yySgao`+`~`'.:p6~~u_;dwG'E~~fi3~5 `ppn~~'n~rp~~iiis~ t~S2K~~~jj'df o ~ ~ o o ~ I
M /9 ~f '+ a~0 W ~A ~ ~ N Nay. ~ w ~O 'fir w ~ ~ w ~ ~ N ~ Yi I 11'; i
N [O a0 ~ m
~T ~4 5$~ St ~~?i ±,S5~~ SQ~e~ 55?~ g ~y S2 M
~~ ~'~~~4rTi+~a~~~"n~~`~-+'~~~ii157~S2Sina2S ~ ~si5 ~'
Y
N j ~. i ~. ~ 11] N g I
~a ~~SiS~M~i i
M 'Bn~Ti$a4w'~"-°.~iu e~t~++~ 4 a ~!(i ~ ~iuQ i I
i F
' N
to N N -. .~ n ~'
i
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~C~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ '
~~s~~~~~~~^x~~~~~~~~~~s~s~~ a ~~ ~ ~ a
N ` ~~ N
~ ~~ ~
o
~ ~' ~
N ~ ~
Y y ~g1 4
~ J W OL y LL ¢
C7
~"' '°'.l
O
.~
LL
~ ) ~ ) ) ? > } ) ) 1 } '~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1987
July 14, 1987 Sale of Courthouse Revenues Reclassified
from General Fund to Capital Fund
August 25, 1987 Sale of Mountain View Technological Park
Tract
October 13, 1987 Net Proceeds from VDOT for Easement in
Front of Vinton Library
March 8, 1988 Renovations to Public Safety Building
Balance as of April 26, 1988
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
$ -0-
25,000
107,207
6,180
(130,000)
8 387
..,.. ",,,,cP
x
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GENERAL FUND
Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1987 $1,010,687
June 23, 1987 Additional Revenues from Septic Tank Fees 29,000
July 14, 1987 Reappropriate Revenues from Sale of (25,000)
Courthouse (Memo: An Additional
$150,000 for Sale of Land is budgeted
as General Fund Revenues, but will not
be Realized by General Fund) (42,793)*
July 28, 1987 Revise Budget for Victim/Witness Grant (1,000)
August 11, 1987 Storm Sewer Construction - Ogden Road (10,200)
*August 25, 1987 Sale of Mountain View Technological Park
Tract Reclassified to Capital Fund (107,207)
October 27, 1987 Completion of Starkey Park (67,010)
December 1, 1987 Valleypointe (198,937)
December 15, 1987 Excess Revenues over Expenditures as
Presented in the Audit Report for the
Year Ended June 30, 1987 1,052,806
January 12, 1988 Acquisition of Ida Mae Holland Estate (260,000)
Balance as of April 26, 1988 $1,380,346
The recommended level for fund balance for 1987-88 is $1,597,756, which
is 3 percent of the total General Fund budget.
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
L-y
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
Original Budget at July 1, 1987
August 18, 1 987 Regional Airport Expenses
(Approved Administratively)
October 13, 1987 Valleypointe Project - Binder
for Land Purchase
November 17, 1987 Land Acquisition Monies No Longer
Needed to be Appropriated
November 17, 1987 Purchase of 2 Vehicles
December 9, 1987 Purchase of Microwave
(Approved Administratively)
February 9, 1988 Restoration of Courthouse Portraits
Balance as of April 26, 1988
Possible Appropriations on the May 10, 1988 Meeting:
Wellness Program
Meals Tax Expenses
Sul~nitted (bey ,L~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
$13,942
(3,772)
(1,000)
49,390
(19,233)
(244>
(8,350)
$30,733
(3,400)
(11,500)
15 833
M
Thank you Board Members and Mr. Hodge for providing
this forum for citizens to address their elected officials.
My name is Doug Chittum and in attendance with me today
is my wife Lisa. We live on Route 617 in Southeast Roanoke
County in what is commonly referred to as the Mount Pleasant
Community. Our address is 3403 Pitzer Road. Last year
after searching the Roanoke Valley for a building site with
enough land to keep horses, I decided to purchase 5.5 acres
on which I currently reside. I had been looking for an area
not prone to development possibilities and after researching
the Mount Pleasant area, I though I had found the right
place. I was told by the County's Director of Planning that
the area past the Parkway overpass bridge on Route 617 was
designated to remain a "Rural Preserve" and that according
to the County's 25-year Comprehensive Plan, adopted by this
Board, water and sewer services would not be extended into
this area. Because my 5.5 acres did not have 90 feet of
public road frontage, I had to apply for a variance from
this building restriction which was granted to me by the
County Planning Commission. I then built a house on the
land and moved in on November 1, 1987. At that time, I was
working as a real estate appraiser and I was told by many
real estate professionals that I was making a grave mistake
investing my money in Southeast Roanoke County, to which I
usually replied that I was not investing in a house, I was
investing in a way of life.
But soon this way of life was interrupted. On the
morning of Sunday, November 21, 1987, 21 days after moving
in, my wife and I were having coffee in our new home when we
spotted a man in our front yard placing an orange marker in
the ground at our front door. I went outside and inquired
as to what he was doing. He handed me a piece of paper
granting permission for right-of-entry to conduct tests for
the proposed Eastern Circumferential. My wife and I went
back inside and after composing ourselves decided that the
best course of action for us to take was to stay as informed
as we possibly could concerning the Circumferential
location and basically to try to make the best of an
upsetting situation, and this is what we did until late
April, 1988 when we received a phone call from our good
neighbor Mrs. Ruth Saul Eastwood whom we had purchased our
land from. She told us that a reporter from Channel 10 News
was filming on her property and when she went out to
question him she was told that this farm was being
considered for a possible land fill site. I might add that
the "old Saul farm" as it is referred to by familiar
residents is a beautiful sight to behold, so much so that we
had situated our house in such a way and constructed the
rear of the house out of glass as to be able to survey the
entire landscape, landscape which is now a proposed
landfill. Well after composing ourselves once more,
my wife and I have decided to remain informed citizens and
to try to make the best out of two upsetting situations.
Number 1 being proposed routes 6 and 7 of the
Circumferential going through our living room and number 2
having the most panoramic view ever afforded a
landfill.
Gentlemen, these are issues of grave importance to me
and to my wife and I am trying not to let our emotions run
away with our ability to reason. But the issue that most
upsets me is the fact that in these trying times with the
County facing increased assessments every year with no
reduction of the real estate tax rate, layoffs within the
schools, administration buildings that are termed "money
pits", county employees that receive no cost of living
adjustments year after year, only merit raises that they
supposedly' have earned in the first place and now the
location of a major thoroughfare and a landfill, we as
citizens of this Valley are asking the question, "Where are
our leaders?" A local resident whom I respect very much has
taught me a simple philosophy concerning the way to judge
effective forward thinking gpvernmental leadership.
Progressive government acts while the rest react. I charge
to you that Roanoke County has been reacting much too long.
For example, we are being told by the Landfill Board
that there is not enough time to secure a waste to energy
plant and that the immediate need is to secure a landfill
site, an admitted short term solution. Well, weren't they
aware of this in 1976 when the last landfill site was
located, and will the residents of this County be given this
same explanation 12 years from now when the search is on
again? Why wasn't work started 10 years ago on finding a
solution to this problem? The residents of Mount Pleasant
were told in a meeting last Thursday night that it was not
enough to say no to the landfill, that we had a "moral
obligation" to find an alternative solution. At the Public
Hearing on the landfill several weeks ago, Richard Cranwell
was the first to speak representing our area and he offered
to help find an alternative solution, but where were our
County leaders. We are now reacting to the ineffec~~ of
past leadership. Perhaps the saddest part of this scenario
is the total lack of respect that the owners of the possible
sites were shown when our leaders permitted these people to
find out from the media what was being planned for their
property. Only the Bedford County Board of Supervisors had
enough forethought to say no to disclosing the location of
the site in their County out of respect to the landowners.
Another example is that after the Second Citizen
Information meeting concerning the location of the Eastern
Circumferential, it was reported in the evening edition of
the Roanoke Times and World News that Route ~~8 affected part
of the proposed Explore Park. The following morning edition
of the paper had headlines that stated that Steve
Musselwhite of the Virginia Transportation Board had
declared "Explore safe" and went on to report that Explore
was "to important of a project" to be threatened by the
Circumferential. I can't believe the County permitted this
kind of thing to be said without so much as a word of
protest being uttered. If tie Virginia Transportation Board
has already decided what and who is important enough to
warrant protection from this highway, then what is the
purpose in having the Corridor Study in the first place?
This all goes back to my initial charge, that the
County is not acting, we are reacting, and it is
questionable as to how well we are doing that. It is high
time that we the County set the agenda for our future. I am
one citizen that is tired of seeing the ~~ the
Steve Musselwhites, the Landfill Boards, etc. telling the
County what we will or will not do. It is time to take some
strong stands on the issues facing us and dare those who
would challenge us to either come up with better solutions
for the good of all County residents or send them back to
their special interest groups licking their wounds. We are
facing tough times and we will overcome them only if we are
tougher and more farsighted than those who would like to be
dictating our future.
Last week I met my representative on this Board,, Dr.
Harry Nickens, for the first time and after we had
introduced ourselves, I said are you Dr. Nickens our
supervisor to which he replied, "Yes, if you'll still claim
me." Well Dr. Nickens, if you remember I told you, yes I
still claim you and that I would be calling on you soon for
your help, and this is why I am here today, I am asking for
your help and I am challenging everyone on this Board to
protect our beautiful County and to insure that we are in
control of our own destiny. There are already bitter seeds
sprouting not only in Mount Pleasant, but in many other
communities where people feel like they are at the mercy of
those who would destroy their way of life and that they have
no on e in their government who cares. I offer an open
invitation to any and all members of this Board and the
County Administration to come to our Community and you are
all welcome at anytime to come to my home and see first hand
how the decisions you will soon make will affect Southeast
Roanoke County for eternity. Let us set the agenda for
ROanoke County, let us act and not react, and let the people
of this County say, we have strong government here.
Thank you for the opportunity to speak.
1647 Millbridge Road
Salem, Virginia 24153
May 9, 1988
Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
3738 Brambleton Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia
Gentlemen:
I would like to commend the results of the Blue Ribbon Commission Report,
and generally endorse their recommendations. These would go a long way toward
making a much more efficient use of our tax dollars. Certainly the county
currently operates in a less than optimal manner which wastes available revenue.
I am deeply troubled by the attempts to balance the budget by school
classroom staff reductions rather than implementation of identified efficiencies
(ie the Blue Ribbon Commission). While school attendance is declining, and budget
cuts should thereby result, such drastic reductions as are currently planned can
only reduce our school system to one of only average if not below average quality.
As a graduate of Roanoke County schools who has lived and worked in several
other states, I have found a direct relationship between economically growing
areas and the quality of their school systems. The continuing layoffs at General
Electric, as well as the currently planned, even more extensive reductions at my
employer (Norfolk Southern) mean that the valley. must become much more serious
at attracting new industry. As schools that provide a well educated work force
are a key ingredient in attracting industry, it seems very counter productive to
reduce educational quality. To grow we must attract quality. industry with above
average jobs, and they will only come if we have an above average educational
level. Our schools must be viewed as a key strategy in attracting new industry
rather than a place to make extensive budget cuts so that existing wasteful
spending practices can continue.
As a licenses Certified Public Accountant, I believe that additional study
must be given to the evaluation of the effects of the planned educational cuts.
While I do understand that budget cuts may be necessary, I also believe such
further study will show other ways to achieve the necessary savings without
sacrificing the quality of education. To do otherwise would be "penny wise and
pound foolish" as well as result in detrimental effects for the citizens of
Roanoke County for years to come.
Sincerely,
Steven L. Clemons
May 9, 1988
Board of Supervisors
3738 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven su.ccesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a~quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
~ s. ,.~.,°~.
lb
May 9, 19~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for° budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that Y~ave been proven succesfu.l.
Ou.r schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I arri aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice ma.y well be worth it.
Sincerely,
it
May 9, 19t3~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendutio:.s.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency a.nd effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesful.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I arri aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
~?
;~~~
lb
h'(o y Q ~ ~ ca K N.
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven su.ccesful.
Our schools are presently providing a. quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
lb
May 9, 19f3L'
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors;
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency a.nd effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesful.
Ou.r schools are preser~tiy providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice ma.y well be worth it.
Sincerely,
~~~~~
~_, -fix .;~' ~~
f
lb
May 9, 19E~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in our schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for }audget cuts but I feel the idea of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven su.ccesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in cla.ssroorn positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
'ncerel
lb
May 9, 19t~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors;
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
;~^/~~~~c-~~ .1,~'.~--ate Y/'1 '(~~
lb
May 9, 198
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven su.ccesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a~quality edu.ca.-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
~ ,~
%_ ~ i
`?
lb
May 9, 1~~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the irri-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? T
would like to sae an eft'iciency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesfu.l.
Ou.r schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my ~~hild-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
lb
May 9, 1~~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors;
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. T respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice ma.y well be worth it.
Sincerely,
lb
May 9, 19~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Bra.mbleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors;
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tior~ but reduction in classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
lb
May 9, 19E~F
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors:
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see an efficiency and effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesfu.l.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but reduction ire classroom positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that ari evaluation of this
nature may recommend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
---,.
(~
i
lb
May 9, 19~~
Board of Supervisors
373 Brambleton Ave.
Roanoke, Va.
Board of Supervisors;
As a taxpayer of Roanoke County I want to commend your
attempts at saving my tax dollars. I have reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Commission Report and endorse the im-
plementation of their recomendations.
My greatest concern lies with the current personnel
lay-offs in ou.r schools. With such drastic reduction
now, exactly where will we save in the future? I
would like to see a.n efficiency a.nd effectiveness
study done in the school system. I respect the need
for budget cuts but I feel the idea. of more efficient
spending should be addressed prior to the elimination
of those elements that have been proven succesful.
Our schools are presently providing a quality educa-
tion but redact; nn ;n Qia.Sjl'VUirl positions will ensure
the decline of this quality in the future.
In conclusion, I am aware that an evaluation of this
nature may recorntnend changes I am not anxious to make,
but my top priority is the value of education my child-
ren receive, the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Sincerely,
~', ~~~t~a-- Q~
~~
lb
.r°'~
_~-~ .~``
~ ~.E-- ~7~T~ T/c~~'~~ ~/~~Si.~cJ mss.-
~C3'r~~,E~~S ~~ ~ .
/ ~ .~ ~ ~--
y~v~ .,~~
i Jam' cam- ~-~i r~/~` ~~~"~__
p'v~ ,~°r~ Y ~/ yam' ~.` ~~ W r~_J ~ _ ,~O ~T, ~J.~-~~5~`'~T
J ~,u-Y
~: ~.rr~ ~ i r--.,G~----
~~~"..~ /~%i/~}~c- ~~iV ~ /° /•G..~-- `~"~' BBC ®1f ~' Q~ T
/~-
-~ ~- ~~ ~~
p--~-•-wt~~- r ~_
UlE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED 70 THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY ~
. j, /~
- ~- ----- -,-. --- - _ -------- - .. r°'`'~.` ~'~_ --= r lei. --~-
~In`~".~ ~ --
~ ~±~~
~~'
`"- -- -
- - -- -
- ~rG'F-~I' ~ p""~.~------
~`
1~./~ia-,~f -- ------ -
o:K,~w..a. ----
~b g ~'"'/t2°r- --
~~~~~~ ~~~~~F~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~= --G~~~--- -------
----r'~~---~~F~= --------------
----~%~-J'QF~.~~~--------------
~`~
.. lam{/ \l Y.. 7. Y `.~ ........... .
Gl~, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUN7y.
J
-Q~y==-==-~~-! --~--------------
r ~ + rr #
~t~~~~..~~s~~~ -~-----------
cr - -~~ ~~ --------------
-'~"~ ,
--=-- -~~f-.~ -----------------
_ -~
-V,~ - ~ -
~ ~'`~~=`=`J-------------
7 f~'- - ----------
-- -
~ ~
~~
~. ~ /~/
~~`'
-----~?'z ----=~- ----------------
--~1~<; ~~~~~ ----~~~~2~~--------
'~
~~.~_~ ~ , , ~, ,~, I_~c -~ ` i J~--~t-%- - - ~ -
,, ~ ;
-~
~i
3 ~-
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLE'
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
- ,_ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~, ~
~'--- rr- r=~~--~~---~- ~--~------------
-~S ~'-r~,L 1-Z __~ -_~-~--I ----------
~G-_L/_~
:~~~~~
C?Cc ~ ~.Sr~ ~.~~ ._'
~~'=-yy-~~r-----------------------
1
.~zS. "LGi ~L 11 Ql - /i ' ~ ~~t~- - - - -
~' /
L~
- -~-,-T
>>
WE, THE UNDERSI~NEU, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANUflll IN 7HE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
e ~-
_~
- - - ` - Jf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ ~,
-~.~-.
v ~~
~-
!r-~-
~J ="-
~;~_ --
y' ~
a ' ~ ~~
~M~~ ~,
~,~.~ _
~~~-~~'
~~_
_~~~~~ _
?i.~ ~ ~ --- --------
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDfILI IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF
~~5------------
_ ~9L1_`~4~C_~-_
~.,,,~_ ~~~S-n-- ----------
- - --- ------
-L31~e=4~- T~'-J~7~.y--------
~~_~. ---
--~~_-------fi=r--'~-~a=~----------
_~--!~ n -- ------------
0~~
_~2e~`~~_~_ ___ __ .____-____
_~_ ~.~
SO(1T EAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
'tJ
~,
_ ~ _ .~ ,
--- ~~ -L -_'=~--- ~: Z~---------
t
-- ~-j~--r~~~~ -t=~ ---------------
~_~~=--Y _.~ __~ _r_ ~-------------
~~
~~--~r~- C~----------
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
-- --- ---- ---
',~°~~ -
=- -
~-- ~-n~"y~°-~ -------------
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
_~,~1.~
- ~~-„~--~rza~--------
___ 0?s~ _ Z_ ~ _____________
- -~- ~-
~~~~ -~~_1-t- __________________
~ ~
-~ ~ 1~-~ -----------
~ ~ ,
t
___.L_ ~ yam- ~•~w,r,,,v_____
-~,~.~---L~4.4'4~-~.~ -----------
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
Cam.; .sP~~:,.- - -
~,Q - -
x-~
~a
~~
~~ =----
_11~-------
~.~o~---_--
-~.~~'-
--
fl ~# -------------
---~~,..a,_a_
--
-L -- ~- - ---------
-~~:.'~k :4tL2 --- --------------
--~1~- ~---- - - ---'---------
_~ ,
'nom'- ~~~~4~~~=- ---------
T-
n
a~ ~~!~~ ~~.:------------------
~~
~~~ _ -'nom- _ z~.~-~'=n.-
,.
~ ---
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
. __.
a '-~ c~~~
c ° '.-~~ -
~~~ ~~ -
e.~~ -
SRr~vt.Fl ~~L _'"'"""""_._'"
?!~f~ = -
-~ ~- - -
-~ ~°~ -
-~.~~ -
_r_sar~ro~svsc.--.~~x~===~-~f---------
_-=~! _:
---==~~~~-~~-~-=M--------------
-ems- i-r-__
'*`~.
7
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OP1'OSEO TV TIIE LOCATION VF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE ~uvuNr PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTffEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
z~~ ~
-c'
~ - -
~.
'~., -- -
~°~'~ - -
~~ ~wae,~- _ .
,~o"~_
-- '~-~1~-------
.e.F--..uQ --------------
~a..~' '.~.l~. ~..__.__...
'1~-. '_-_'__-
~~/'_~_
.~_o~.:"_'~____
__
~, i..,l~ '"'.."""....
~- -^~~--
~LGl~
~? ~'.~-.
~.;
,~.~ .~
~,
?~-:. - -
~~~~~.
l~
J ...
~ r
a, r~nvr al. a. 1n 1111.. TIVUI~1 7 LL hJ-~R1 /~1~Lh Vr JVU1 TIL/\J1 nVIl1~VnL ~. V~+~~r +
-- -~~~4~-- --
~ ~ ~~~. ~sQ~ ~,
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED 70 THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
.~,
o-: --: ---
_TJ~r'ua._a~[b ................
~~ e~.~
~\'~~J( / P~_~"'_"'"'
~. / .._
~' ~v -
-- --- ---
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
Gil l~ ~ k~fc
~~
_~
.~ ~ . .
~-~Foo~
-------------------
,-'r' - ----- ---~--
---l---~-~~
_~~
~~~
--r=---------------
_ __
e.~ _ _~~~~ - - -
f~.~v- -
_ d.~ ____ __________
--=~----- .----- ----- X--------
~_~~
--------------
--
--
~~ --
- - --
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OF
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
/',/`,, .
--~.~i,,~!a~~~---------------
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND UPF
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA 0
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OP.
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
--- ~~ --r!---------------
---~'~R:~~---C ~~-3e~--------------
'u'G"~'S ---------------
. ~ ... ~ . ~ . L ... „ ... ~ ....... ~ .. ~ .... ~ .
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND UPP
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA U
~~~ ~~-- --=~-a-------------
~~~---- ~ - ~ilct' ----------
i - _ _' _ -
. ~~
GlE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALL
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
j~ ~~ _ ~~
Lys'Pfxh_S~~g,7}Qh--------------- - ~-?'~~- -1~--r~---- ---
~v_!z_ v~i~--------------------- - - '~L---- - ----
---- ----~~--- ---- --------------- -~--~~-~=~-r~_~___~~2~-------
-- _ -- _ ~~~ -------------- _C~-_ ~ ~ ____--
--- -- ---- --------------- .~. tit,-- --- --'---------------
~-
___ __~_~f~~z~_______________ _________________________________
~_____~~r_ __________ _________________________________
~~
____Q_____________ _______________ _________________________________
- - - - - ~--~~-a~=~=---- ----------------------------------
2~- - -
`~ -^--~-- h ~`~- -------- ----------------------------------
wE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO 7HE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUN7y.
=,~;~ -
.~ ~t~~-
-- --
~.,_ ~~.~
,~~ -
-~~ --
- --
. Q
~,~Y~~----------------
~ ~~
~ ..~
- -~
~~~`=
~~ 1
-t
~-~--
~~---
---------------
S
~J~~~---~'- ----- ----------
,,--f~~----- -s~.~.Q-------------
_ ~ ~%:~ ---z-------
-- - - ~~-~A~.)- -- - ----
~-
-------------
.~~~ _I_ _
U/E, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TU THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
. y - ~ ... z..+s......... - - - ~ ~ - -
.. s ..... r.~r_ y_ ..r .................. .
_ ___yc _{_ _+.c_______________
=~~-'= V ``~--- -----
5~r~!_e _~yn~_l--
~_~ y
~~~Z_L~
l~a_--------
~,-~,~-.
~a:(d::
~~~-~~_
Z~~w.~~e~t~&:-
----------------------------------
J~~ ------ - ------------------
----- - ~T =----------
A~,~------- -
x~~«~~ --
-R-`« l=-~' -
f~ -
!~^daatt~.No,~ ----
wE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
~~
~-i~wj"------ ----------------
=~ -- ~,~ ~t~~--------------
_i~~~~------ -----
~~ ~~
,~-. ~. ~J-- -- -'~------
~-
_ ,_
2~ 2G~_l2l~ ~e~~ _t~~P_S ~ !~~~
~~~~~~ _ '~'.~r~-~-~ -sue-----
L ~-3 /~iTz..~_`-~----------
~`
~~,~~i~~~ ~~~~
~~r-------------~ ----~-
~?-~ ~~
~~Q(~._t~ acdrx~~1lr~ _~l~a~e
G1E, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
i
~~}t ~ ., -------
- - - - - - - - - -.r - - - - - - - -
~.. /~ ~ j7 ~`~ i
~~
~_ - _ _-w ~
~%~ - - - - - .r~~- - -
_ _ .~
• w .. ~ ~' ..r.
. ~
'f ''~ _
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION Of A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
~,._
~_o
----~J--- --~~ ~,, , ---
f
=1~u-.~-------
a ~_ .
~~°,~-
-~~----
----- ~"'-'1 -- ~-~..~--
-------~~---~-~-E ----
---- -
--- - -~'~9- - -,~s~.~'------
----~-~-,~_~Qto,~~J--------
- ~~°.-.j--~~------------
----
_ ~~n~ ~~~/~--------
--- ~ _ ~4uVY`~DL--------
A~r„u-ri~'Y_~_---------
----Q ~-,,-~-~~-- --------
Gam!? -T--------
-~ --
_~e ---
~-
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
- --- - -r_~~---------
- - -~~.-f-~'~f-
---~'-.~-~~'j-- - ---- ------
--- r' _---~'S'~''~-'=='------------
~~
~ _ __
__~~? ________t___ ____ _____
-~~
~ -
` ~ ~ r _
,; t r r, ° + r t'~
~~~I ~, ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
. ~ ; ~, ~ +
i
~~`G' -~ 5^r- -- -
,~_~. ~rL
E/_
?' - °7 - -
Nafl~ -
w!1a2E =/~ ------
~%~~'' t~af~t--P - --
~~ °-
~~ ~ .
~_~~~a
`, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
.L IN THE MO(JNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOIITNEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
~.~.~.
2-~ - -
-~~ x ------------------
- - - - ~t---------
- - ,~~~ .r_p~ ------
-rr--------------------
~---- - `/t~2G~ _ ----------
----------------------------
UJE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SO(17
~ ~, ,
--- ~ ~ - ~-~---'-~~~--r=~--------- ---
i
!l'~,~Cf~ ~~ ~ 'f' ~
_~Cn~_~' ~ ----- ---
- .IJ
__~
~2~_----
----------------
UIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED 70 THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
~~ w~
~,
- -
- --
~~~¢
~~~
~n:~~---------
~Jld_ _~~!~ --------
~- ---=--~-y,~--------
--- -~-1~-------
~ ~ -~~.e
- ~.~_l_~___~--------
--- ~'
- ----
-- ,,~-W~~~~--
_~ ~ --
=-----
~z ~ .-------------
c ~
--- ~-~,~,,~y - p~~,. -~.-}~---
--~~`~"`-'`-'~-- -- ~~dc'--
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND t
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT ARE.
o - -
~~
-------------
mxa,~,
.~/..K.~. ---
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND DPl
LANDFILL IN THE MDUNT PLEASANT AREA t
- --- a = - - -----~~-~---
_.~~ ~i~~-----------------
~-
~- -- -may ~~'~1~~------
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
~.~_
~.a.~
n ,r.
~.~. - -
---
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNEV, STANV OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
-----,~~ ~~- f---------------
~~y~--.y-----------
_~_~-ru =-------------------
~S~~;-~''~' - -
~~f"~ -
'- --
~~.~ h' z
~- t
~yvx --
~'°~
,~~.~, -
R
=~r~
~~~~:- ::
~`°
gym''- ~--~-
UlE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT ARC
------=! ~~r`~-----------------
UIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
~° -
~ a: ~....
- --
~~
~ ~°_
-~- w---~
~.~
-~~ ~ --
-~- ~~° - -
~~~`W"
~~~~~
- - --
~~ - n~2_
~'~~ -
n~_ N -
~1ti.~- --
- '"`
"~ ~- ~'
- ~~E£ C`k`` - - -
` ~~
- _ % /
--_rG JJ___y-~_v =.t-ifs-a._ _______
-- p~_~,~.-----------
~~~. ~a~a----------
--- -
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUN7y.
~~ ;
l,,` .
,~ . L~
.-
6 _1~
~ G'~
~.~ ~`` .
~.~~! - ~ -~ ~ 4..i------- f -----
~,~ ,
_~` _-~~1 __ ~
.,
- -~ - - -
..... .. ~~~/ ~I~,/~. ~~. .i .........
/•~ .~ ~ L
"+~
`-= ~ ~ -
_~~~y.~-~~ X11 ~~'-=~~--~~_~ ------ ---
r,_
-- 1 ~- - ---------
-- ~_- -- `
-~~,~,
-~ <~~~~
-------~-----_-_~ ---mars--_ .-rr~s----
-- ~ ~,~'
-~-- ~
c,-.-.~:
~--_
~J~ "."~_
- -- ~~°'~
/- - - :.~~
l
r ~ ----- - -- -- - -- -
. . ~~ . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ~
. ~~ . . 7 . . . . ~ . . ~; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~
'~S1N1100 3~ONV0?! 1SY3H1ClOS 30 V3?lY 1NVSV31d 1NIlDiN 3H1 NI 7713aNV1
~311VA d 30 NOI1d001 3H1 O1 a3SOdd0 aNY1S `a3N~IS?13aN11 3H1 `3m
~ ,
~T-T1t-
r
w .,
' .
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OP
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
~,
- -
_ s__ _ _ __________
- - -1 r '" y ~~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. ._ ~;~` ~
LeJ ~~~,~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND U
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
~ /
~ -
~;~~ D ----- - --~-
~., r :.. ~- ~ . -~ ~.,
_ ~~ ~ ?!__!ti 2 4~1-1~u1----------
~~~~ --
~~2< <.:~~ ~ - -
r~~a,~:~g~~ -
-d~ =-~-
/7R
~~'----
~~J`~-
w . /~'/1~
- - ~'z-=) ------
~ _r'`'- ---------
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED 70 THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
Y~~.~.
~<~ ~ ~~
i
--------
---
--?I~t -~~~~J- - ~'-~°~j ---------
~L ---~~--------------
~~-Yd~~~-- -------
~ --
~`~'-`~--y-~J-`~=--- ----- ---
~~.-d~--~9----
.~ (~~-tl['S.^Zst..~:-ter
-----------------
-- -
~~iCr'- =~ --
~ ~~=.a__
~-
___N_~L -~~ ___________
~~ ___
,~,
/`
UlE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLE!
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
___ -KT-.~-r-------T------------
j - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ri---- -r-- -CCU---- --~-~--~--------
~ - -
i
_ ;~-~~~ x {~ ---------
- _ ~~ - ~. ~
~y ,,``,
/~l ~-r ~ -------------
d------------
~i~-
~,:a
~~~ - --
- - ~ JV-
~= a- - C~
~ c~ _ ~
W=~ ~---~"-=L~ y --_--
~~ _
GIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST
«_,.~~ --
«.u ~<~ -
~°~~' - -
a~,ow0 r2~
--
.Y' z~~ - -
~~-.s C`~ --- -
,~
....
Q3ti~ .,~--... -
.... v_.ra--~i-mom"'----__ __-__
~~a `T - -
~layt~?- -
~e'~
-._~r~~----
- --------------------
~~n ---
- -- --
ROANOKE COUNTY.
C'd i /J
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TO THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA
~~~~
a ~-----
L~ ~
.~~_-~__~_m_~Q _-- ----____--
a~ ~_ -----------
OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY.
1 \' w_ ~ r.~~nA
~;~~°_ ,~
~--- ----
~/: --
~?~'~`a='jf-=--------
<~
--Y/ - = ~ ------------
r r
fa±~,,. d
o,~
~' ~e~
~-
~~hki~ -
~ ~~.
,~~~2,.~~
~`~°~ -
Ge~•s<~"
~~
'°~ ~' -a
-- L~.u.a.~__ i- - ~----
-------- ~?-~G~~-?~ ----------
~`
,~~~.~ti~~ . - ----------
-------- --%~l_.-«--
------
---
-- -
i
,`
GJE, THE UNDERSIGNED, STAND OPPOSED TD THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
1
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST ROANOKE COUNTY. `
~~~-- -
z
?~~ --
~ --~-
-- T- --~~~----------
~'
-- ~~d~-_~~--- ----------
--------r~- - ------ -----------
-- ---- \--~o- -- ~------
~- . ~. ~
r~~~
-=~7~-------------
----------------------------------
~~ -
_»=~ -
--/ ~~~-i-----------------
~~%f~~-~i'~------------------
__ ••__
/ _C_V ~- /~ ~ //~~/~~
WE, THE UNVERSIGNEU,
STAND OpPOS~'D TD THE LOCATION OF A VALLEY
LANDFILL IN THE MOUNT PLEASANT AREA OF SOUTHEAST RDANOKE COUNTY.
.l.^.~ ~ _.x1i..er.N._~~y...._.
--
1~~~~~
'~~~~_
_ ~,K/_ ~~
- --- __ .~1~~----
-~~~
n
~~=~'Mlf =~1QO..~~r~ ~~j~[ x rrl.cfr s ~ ~..~s _ _~
~lYyS,L~L~y ~ Wit' - urrr s sY y =
~wv++.•`` ALA/`/.~I/Cy/l~
i
I
I Z
•~
o~~
..... r.....
-----~~..~_~~1 ---
r-~,,
.- ~~
~y~~~ --
,.3--~~c-1~
~„~,.n~a
- - -- -~
~ -~
"* ,~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC REARING ON _~~ u,~r2 C~I~v~'~ ~ : ~~E,c2viSa,~5./~/~~"?~~-T~U
,C ~i~ o r`'GS.C ~ ~ ~yY L71=i.C .C' ~rrc° ~3s O
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME: 1
ADDR S: ~~
---~--
PHONE : 0 ~' ~
iT
~~~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.>
~'I - Z
~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
FARING ON ~ J ~c~~c h `1~f
rUfLIC i ~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO 'rHE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTKORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME:
,~-Anne.. ~ra~d~
V/c
ADDRESS : / / ~ vZ QI~Q~.4~.5 /Yl
CrZ[~' 1lV~ V ~ ~~ ~`~ ~i
PHONE : ~ ~ ~ ~~~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during .the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : „~ D ~ ~ l~tt. 7~f/ M
ADDRESS : 3N0 3 ~T ze, ~/. S ~- .
PHONE : / g ~ ` ~ 7 `3 /
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
~"-/
February 9, 1988 4 i)
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
February 9, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ounty, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
dministration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1988.
.N RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:00
.m. The roll call was taken.
ERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
EMBERS ABSENT: None
TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator;
Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County
Administrator for Community Development;
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Brenda
J. Holton, Acting Deputy Clerk; Gardner
Smith, Director of General Services;
533
=-~
February 23, 1988
HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
y, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.f requesting acceptance of
11 Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby
escinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Hill Drive, a
ection of road extending from Glade Creek Drive (Route 636),
.79 miles east of Bonsack Road (Route 603) and extending in a
outherly direction 0.29 miles to the cul-de-sac, pursuant to
ection 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section
3.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
mended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
`irginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
asements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 54, dated
ecember 16, 1975 and Deed Book 1269 Page 205 recorded on July
1, 1987 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's
ffice.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
blic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
used by motor vehicles.
~~ v
.February 9, 1988
Stephen Carpenter, Director of Parks &
Recreation; Phillip T. Henry, Director of
Engineering; John Willey, Real Estate
Assessor; Reta Busher, Director of Bud et;
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance; Keit
Cook, Director of Human Resources
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by Reverend G. Thomas Bro
Southview United Methodist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance
recited by all present.
IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
County Administrator Elmer Hodge announced that the
meals tax bill passed the third reading in the House this
afternoon. It will be forwarded to the Senate for their
consideration. He commended the delegates for an outstandin<
job.
IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
u was
Mr. Hodge added Item E.5, Resolution for State
4'~ 1
February 9, 1988
ndustrial Access Funds for Valleypointe Access Road and
ignalization. On the Consent Agenda, Items ll.b (Hill Drive)
nd ll.b (Airpoint Drive) are to be withdrawn.
RE: NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for allocation of funds for restoration of
:ourthouse portraits. Mr. Hodge advised that several months
ego, a committee was formed for restoration of portraits in the
:ourthouse and for documentation of the history of the portraits.
'he first phase has been completed and a second group of
portraits were damaged by a leak in the roof. The committee
~equested that funds be allocated for the restoration of the
~emaining fifty portraits because a delay might cause damage
Beyond repair. The committee is requesting $8,000 from the Board
ontingency Fund.
Supervisor Nickens inquired as the amount of the Board
ontingency Fund at this time. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance,
aid it was $39,083 before the $8,000 deduction. Supervisor
ickens recommended that any time funds are allocated from the
oard Contingency Fund, the summary document should show an
nding balance. -
4 "~ 2
February 9, 1988
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve staff recommen tion.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar~{~tt
NAYS: None
2. Settlement with the City of Roanoke for bulk
water Durchases for fiscal year ended June 30, 1987
1Postnoned from January 26 1988 Meeting) Mr. Hodge state
that he had attempted to meet with Bob Herbert, Roanoke City,
Manager, about this matter but because of the General Assemb'
Y
process and some of the other issues both are working on, d
been unsuccessful. There is a meeting scheduled for Thursda of
this week at the VML Conference. Mr. Hodge does not have a
recommendation at this time.
Chairman Garrett reported that he wrote a letter
Mayor Taylor, City of Roanoke, requesting a meeting to disc s
this issue; however, there is an obligation to pay this deb He
suggested to proceed with payment and he will meet with May
Taylor to discuss this on-going problem.
Supervisor Nickens moved to pay the bill. The mot~~.on
was seconded by Steven A. McGraw and carried by the followi
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar~{~tt
February 9, 1988 4
--^
S: None
3. Request for Resolution of Support for the
>upervisor Johnson asked that this resolution be submitted
Because of the public debates regarding proposed changes in
`unding methodologies for public education and disbursements of
'unds. At the meeting in Wytheville, over 400 people were in
ttendance. Mr. Hodge and Supervisor Johnson met with the
ecretary of Education twice, and discussed the problem with
egislators. Supervisor Johnson felt that the changes in this
ormula would have a devasting effect on this part of the state.
oanoke County is scheduled to receive $133,000 next year under
he proposed changes. The real change in the formula is that
trough a complex set of methods, JLARC, has decided it will take
9.8 positions for each 1,000 pupils to adequately carry out the
tandards of quality. Roanoke County has always tried to go
.bove and beyond achieving minimal standards, and are funding
~resently 69.5 classroom teachers per 1,000 students. Roanoke
ounty is losing money because enrollment has declined slightly.
48 million dollars has been earmarked for the eight northern
irginia localities to compete on a higher level with salaries.
Supervisor Johnson proposed that a copy of this
solution be sent to the Governor and each member of the
4~ 4
General Assembly. Supervisor Nickens inquired if we could
transmit this resolution on a timely basis and was informed hat
County Attorney, Paul Mahoney, will be in Richmond and will (take
certified copies to be delivered.
Supervisor Robers suggested that since this is a
critical issue, we should also begin immediately a study
committee composed of people from the county and school boa
look at those things that can possibly be combined in order
save money. Chairman Garrett asked Supervisor Robers to c
with some rationale for doing this and report back as to wh
assistance he might need to accomplish this.
Supervisor Johnson stated that we still do not ha
data base JLARC used in computing their methodology, even
though this information has been requested from the JLARC
Commission. Supervisor Nickens moved that this information
ry
to
0
up
the
requested under the Freedom of Information Act but withdrew ~o
vote on the motion on the floor.
Supervisor Johnson moved to support this resoluti .
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by he
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar tt
NAYS: None
Supervisor Nickens moved that an official request
February 9, 1988
sent to the appropriate JLARC study committee asking for th
February 9, 1988 4 ` `)
formation to be disclosed within the Freedom of Information Act
ime frame. Seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a
s voice vote.
RESOLUTION 2 88-3 OF SUPPORT FOR THE
CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING EDUCATIONAL
FUNDING FORMULAS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF
VIRGINIA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ty, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has established funding of its
:hool system as one of its highest priorities; and
WHEREAS, because of the County's commitment to
lity education, the Roanoke County School System has
ted many excellent programs for its students and has been
recipient of many awards and recognition of such high
tandards of quality; and
WHEREAS, recommended funding formulas and state school
dates may result in a severe negative impact on Roanoke
y's ability to continue an outstanding educational system
or its citizens, and
WHEREAS, this negative impact could affect all aspects
f life in Roanoke County including possible loss of jobs, a
igher tax rate, and most important, a lessening of our ability
0 offer quality education.
4-"~ 6
February 9, 1988
------ i - ---- ------------,r----- --~ -
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Superv sors
of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby request that the Gen ral
Assembly recognize the devastating effect the proposed schoo
funding formulas would have on Roanoke County and the entire
Roanoke Valley.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Count ,
Virginia does hereby request that the Governor of the
Commonwealth of Virginia and the General Assembly continue t e
existing educational funding formulas at fifty-one percent t
ensure that Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley will Conti ue
to be able to provide a quality education for its students. ~~
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supe
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
4.
sor
Bond Funds to Ft. Lewis Circle Road Project Mr. Hodge stat d
that Ft. Lewis Circle Road was included in the list of roads to
be repaired and finished when the 1985 bonds were issued. Th
appropriation of $3,500 for this project from the Road Bond unds
is requested so that this project can be completed.
February 9, 1988 ~ ` `
Supervisor McGraw moved the allocation of $3,500 for
s project. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
arried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
YS: None
5. Request for Resolution for State Industrial
fr. Hodge stated that E.5 was added today because Brent Sheffler,
conomic Development Specialist, had to request changes by the
ocal engineering firm after consulting with the Virginia
epartment of Highways in Richmond.
Mr. Sheffler further explained that this request was
eing made because the Virginia Department of Highways and
ransportation requested a more specific document stating that
he total funding sources for this industrial access project will
e bonded by Roanoke County. In order to get on the February
eeting, this item is necessary to be passed now. Al Lingerfelt
as encouraged this expeditious action because he would like to
nitiate the development of Phase II. This road is not only
erving Phase I as it is described but it also serving Phase II.
his bonding is the total funding requirement for the critical
lements of this access road, but it does not include the
~xtended loop portion of the Phase I project. If a qualifying
4 "~ 8
February 9, 1988
industry is not located there, it will require the county's
commitment of the remaining $1 million that we have as a
commitment to the developer. From the $2 million, the $1.2
million is for the water and sewer infrastructure and $255,0
for the Ida Mae Holland transaction. The funds Roanoke Coun
could be required to submit will complete that $2 million
commitment .
total
DO
:y
Supervisor Nickens remarked that if we add these
figures, it comes to around $2.5 million. Mr. Hodge said th t
the total amount for this project will not exceed $2 million
that industrial access funds will take care of the amount ov r $2
million. There are also a number of other sources for those
funds which have been explored but are not finalized. Mr. H dge
suggested that the board make the total commitment not to ex eed
$2.5 million out of pocket with industrial access funds beyo d
that. Costs for the improvements on the city's side of the oad
should be borne by the city.
Supervisor Nickens wanted to be sure that we are n t
exceeding the $2 million because that is all we are responsi le
for. Mr. Sheffler said that if we do not locate qualifying
industry on the site, we would be required to release the bo d
totaling $970,000 plus $255,000 expended already. For
clarification purposes, within this agreement, there is a
February 9, 1988 `
(I
veloper funding arangement within the bond. .That fund will
lance out the total of Roanoke County's commitment.
Supervisor Johnson asked if we could put a construction
oad in and start some type of development this spring so we
get a good lead on qualifying industry? Mr. Hodge advised
t the access road that was there for a number of years,
ides for 50 ft. wide access. The Highway Department has
reed for this to be used as a construction road.
Supervisor Johnson suggested that someone research for
shell-building program and inform Mr. Lingerfelt. This might
$~ot attract a qualifying industry but it is another opportunity.
~~ Supervisor Johnson moved staff recommendation. The
otion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
ollowing recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
AYS: None
BSTAIN: McGraw
RESOLUTION 2988-4 REQUESTING INDUSTRIAL
ACCESS FUNDS FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO A
NEW PROJECT TO BE LOCATED IN ROANOKE
COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ty, Virginia, as follows:
480
February 9, 1988
1. That having duly considered the request and
assurances of Lingerfelt Development, Inc. concerning the
proposed development of Valleypointe, Phase I, the Board res~
t-
fully urges and recommends to the Virginia Department of Tra spor-
tation that consideration be given, that immediate study be ade,
and that a project be approved and initiated pursuant to the
provisions of Section 33.1-221 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, to provide approximately 3,400 feet of needed Indus rial
access road improvements from State Route 117 (Peters Creek oad)
to Valleypointe, Phase I, to serve this 52 acre site situate in
Roanoke County; and
2. That Roanoke County guarantees any expense of
acquisition of all necessary right-of-way and the vesting th reof
in the public agency, and does further guarantee any adjustm nt
of utility expenses necessary for the project, and does here y
assure the Virginia Department of Transportation that such D part-
ment shall incur no expense for such items nor for any preli i-
nary engineering or plan development should the industry fai to
locate at the proposed site; and
3. That Roanoke County requests remaining industr al
access funds of $171,500 and matching State funds from the
Virginia Department of Transportation of $150,000. The Coun y
shall provide a local matching contribution of $150,000 to
provide for the maximum allocation of industrial access fund and
J
481
February 9, 1988
_ __ -__ __
- - -
11 request the developer to arrange for funding for access
is (estimated to cost $270,000) within the City's
orporate limits. In addition, the County will provide an
tional contribution of $152,500. In any event, the County
11 bond the State's entire cost for the major elements of the
ndustrial access road. Such costs to include A. Intersection
t at Peter's Creek Road; B. Kenworth Drive realignment
C., the proposed access road from Peter's Creek Road to the
nded loop road into Phase I of Valleypointe, for a total of
970,000 to guarantee compliance; and,
' I~ 4. That the developer, The Lingerfelt Development
rporation, will finance and build the extended loop road
luding~any additional/internal development to Phase I; and,
5. That Roanoke County has requested that the
veloper specify the types of land uses on each tract as
fired by the Virginia Department of Transporation; and,
6. That the Clerk of this Board forthwith transmit
ertified copies of this resolution together with any necessary
ppropriate supporting data to the Virginia Department of
ransportation.
RE: REQUEST FOR WORK SESSION
4g~
February 9, 1988
1, Work Session on Drainage for 2-23-88 Meetinq_
Mr. Hodge stated that at the February 23rd meeting, the Co of
Engineers will address the board on the tributaries which ca se
great damage in the 1985 flood.
The county staff is requesting a separate work sestfiion
for drainage projects which have been identified by citizen
calling the county, and at the community meetings. The
Engineering Department has prioritized these requests.
Supervisor Nickens questioned the staff recommendation of
contacting property owners for input at this work session.
board agreed that this should be a board work session only.
IN RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Recruest for public hearings for citizen input
Block Grant funding for TWEEDS INC for 2 23 88 meetin~-
Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist, stated that a
public hearing must be held to meet state mandates for apply
for Central Development Block Grant funds for TWEEDS, INC.
is a joint effort with Roanoke County and Botetourt County
is
Government. There is a March 4th deadline.
February 9, 1988
48 3
Supervisor Nickens moved staff recommendation. The
on was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by a
voice vote.
RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Qrdinance amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke
P _ °FYf~mT11" inn fnr T.`.7 iiorl c~ ~.,ii Ti c. ~l-.7 ~A n.,,.......... n ~,...i
County Attorney Paul Mahoney
wised that several weeks ago, his office prepared a draft
dinance to amend the existing County code provisions to
crease the total combined income and the net worth provisions
f the county elderly and handicapped relief program. Wayne
ompton, Commissioner of Revenue, was present to answer questions.
~ citizens were present to speak.
Mr. Compton presented a report on the tax relief
rogram, and summarized the figures. Approved for renewals for
.987 were 1,148. New applications received were 118 for total of
,266 approved persons participating in the program. The average
mount saved per family per person is $180 per year. The amount
f taxes relieved was $246,876.35. The amount of taxes returned
~ue to disqualifications was $7,697.
4~~
February 9, 1988
Chairman Garrett said that the question has been ~1~ised
as to whether it is necessary each year to re-sign for this
program. Mr. Mahoney acknowledged that state law provides at
every year a citizen who wanted to participate in the progr
would have to validate their eligibility with the Commissio r of
Revenue.
Supervisor Johnson moved first reading of ordinanc~.
The motion was seconded by Chairman Garrett and carried by
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers,
NAYS: None
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1.
of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes
t
County Attorney Mahoney said that this is the second reading of
this draft ordinance; the first reading was January 26, 1988
This ordinance would authorize the county to enter into a le se
with Ingersoll Rand for approximately five acres of real est~te
for recreational purposes.
Supervisor Johnson said as a related issue that
February 9, 1988 4 8 5
-- ---
11--------- ---- ----- --------- --------------- ------- -- - -
agreement was reached with citizens in the area on keeping the
:ive acres plus for recreation, there was no question raised as
:o the culdesac on Meadewood taking part of the property in
[uestion. Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development, said all
:itizens had been notified in writing. No citizen was present to
peak.
Supervisor Johnson moved second reading. The motion
as seconded by Dr. Nickens and carried by the following recorded
te:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
YS: None
RE: APPOINTMENTS
Supervisor Nickens nominated for reappointment Mrs. May
ohnson, representing citizens at large, and Charlotte
ichtenstein, representing neighborhood organizations, to the
ransportation and Safety Commission.
Chairman Garrett nominated Eugene M. Martin, to the
ievance Panel for the Windsor Hills District.
RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
4g6
February 9, 1988
Supervisor Robers stated that he had been in cont
with Dr. J. Wade Gilley, at George Mason Institute, regard' g
economic development. Dr. Gilley has done a lot of study on
economic development in southwest Virginia. His study show that
there is an overflow of business and industry in the northe
industry area which might be encouraged to move its overflo to
southwest Virginia. Mr. Robers has obtained some of Dr. Gi ey's
work and will pass it on to members of the staff for study. Dr.
Gilley will be in the Roanoke area sometime in the next fou or
five weeks and it is recommended that the appropriate peopl from
staff and board meet with Dr. Gilley to talk about his idea for
economic development. Chairman Garrett asked the clerk to 11
the staff and board and coordinate dates for this meeting.
Supervisor Nickens announced that a CORTRAN meeti was
held on February 8, 1988. Diane Hyatt will have a status r orts
at either 2/23 or 3/8 board meeting.
Supervisor McGraw requested that the chairman be
authorized to send a letter to each of the mayors of the
adjoining jurisdictions as well as to the chairman of the C my
of Botetourt requesting the appointment of two elected offi 'als
from each jurisdiction for a Roanoke Valley Cooperation
Committee, and that Roanoke County be the host location for he
first meeting sometime in mid to late April. The committee ould
February 9, 1988
4 8 ~'
:gin to look at ways to eliminate duplication. of services and
Sys to more efficiently deliver services. The group would meet
open and executive session if they so desire. Supervisor
Graw requested that Supervisor Robers and he be allowed to
rve in this capacity for Roanoke County.
Chairman Garrett moved Supervisor McGraw's suggestion.
motion was seconded by Dr. Nickens and carried by unanimous
ice vote.
Chairman Garrett stated that there is a possibility
t the Regional Landfill Board may suggest one or more county
ocations for future landfill. The policy of this board should
that the landfill users should assume the social costs that
be associated with a regional landfill. These costs should
of fall on individual Roanoke County citizens and the County
.dministrator and his staff should start right now to identify
ny potential impacts that a new landfill location might have and
ropose actions to be taken to mitigate any of those negative
mpacts. Chairman Garrett stated that his intention was not to
re-empt the landfill board but to share with that board the
oncerns that this board has and to express any suggestions,
ith the hope that effective public policies might reduce or
liminate citizen objections to the site of a new landfill should
t be in the county. Chairman Garrett requested that the County
dministrator come up with a conclusion on this. Mr. Hodge will
488
February 9, 1988
meet with the appropriate people and have a report within
weeks.
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent A
with the exception of Item ll.b and ll.f. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar
NAYES: None
RESOLUTION N0. 2988-7 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE iT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of
t
Board of Supervisors for February 9, 1988, designated as It~n L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated I ms 1
through 11, inclusive, as follows:
~~
February 9, 1988
4g9
1. Minutes of Meetings
15, 1987; January 4,
January 22, 1988.
- December 1, 1987; December
1988; January 19, 1988; and
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Library Board and Social Services Board.
3. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.03 miles of Burnham Road (Route 1596)
b. 0.13 miles of Fernway Drive (Route 1791)
4. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.15 miles of Whispering Wind Drive (Route
1162)
b. 0.07 miles of Millwheel Drive (Route 1167)
c. 0.18 miles of Millbridge Road (Route 1168)
5. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.26 miles of Huntridge Road (Route 1220 and
1223)
b. 0.20 miles of Setter Road (Route 1221)
c. 0.12 miles of Springer Road (Route 1223)
d. 0.07 miles of Britaney Road (Route 1224)
6. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that 0.13 miles of Willow Spring
Road (Route 1716) has been accepted into the
Secondary System.
7. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.07 miles of Sean Lane (Route 1918)
b. 0.28 miles of Olde Tavern Road (Route 1919)
8. Approval of Resolution of Support for Roanoke City
Council's plan to donate Veterans Park as site for
state veterans' nursing home.
4JU
February 9, 1988
9. Request for acceptance of water and sewer
facilities serving Hunting Hills, Section 22.
10. Request for acceptance of Orchard Hill Drive
Orchard Circle into VDOT Secondary System.
11. Request for acceptance of the following roads into
the VDOT Secondary System using the 1985 Road ond:
a. Memory Lane
]9---Hill-B~l*ae
c. Lakemont Drive
d. Shadow Lane
e. Indian Hill Road
€---A~rpeint-B~i~re-anel-Airpaix~-Reael
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authori2
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any ofl~said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve with I
11 b. and llf, deleted„ seconded by Supervisor Robers, and~~upon
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar~ett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.g OF SUPPORT FOR
ROANOKE CITY'S PLAN TO DONATE PART OF
VETERANS PARK AS SITE FOR STATE VETERANS'
NURSING HOME
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roar
eke
County, Virginia, as follows:
4~ ~
February 9, 1988
WHEREAS, the federal government donated a 16.8 acre
lus tract of land to Roanoke City in 1980 with a deed
striction that it be used for recreation purposes only; and
WHEREAS, this land, known as Veterans Park, is located
t to the Veterans Administration Medical Center near the Salem
Roanoke boundary and would be an ideal site for a veterans'
ursing home; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke City Council is willing to give part
f Veterans Park as a site for the state veterans' nursing home,
has requested Congress to remove the deed restriction
inviting the property for recreation; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
isors of Roanoke County, Virginia, recognizes that a state
eterans' nursing home would be of great benefit to all the
itizens of Roanoke Valley as well as the State of Virginia, and
oes hereby support the City of Roanoke in their request to urge
he Congress of the United States to adopt the necessary
egislation to remove the deed restriction in order that the
tate veterans' nursing home can become a reality.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens,seconded by Supervisor
rs, and upon the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
S: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
49 2
February 9, 1988
-- --- ------- -- ------I~---~ --
ORCHARD HILL DRIVE AND ORCHARD CIRCLE INTO THE VI~INIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon t
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Orchard Hil
Drive from the intersection with Crumpacker Drive (Rt. 781) o
the cul-de-sac at Lot 15, Block 1, Section 5, and Orchard C cle,
from the intersection with Orchard Hill Drive to the cul-de ac
at Lot 18, Block 1, Section 5, to be accepted and made a pa of
the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-2 9 of
the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easeme s
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as The Orchards,
Section 4 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9 Page
342, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Co t of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 11, 1985 and The Orcha s,
Section 5 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 1 ,
Page 28, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circui
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 22, 1986, and tha by
reason of the recordation of said maps no report from a Boa
493
February 9, 1988
-- -
f Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
tting property owners is necessary. The Board.. hereby
rantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Orchard Hill Drive and Orchard
ircle which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
solution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
cceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
f Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
ers, and upon the following recorded vote:
S: Supevisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
YS: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
MEMORY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.j requesting acceptance of
ry Lane into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby
scinded.
49 ~
February 9, 1988
11----
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon
proceedings therein and upon the application for Memory Lan
a section of road extending from Deer Branch Road (Route 84 ,
0.24 miles north of Knoll Road (Route 841) and extending in
northerly direction 0.04 miles to Memory Lane (Route 843),
pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pur a
to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia o
1950, as amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with neces ry
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 10, ated
October 23, 1961 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Co t
Clerk's Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was o~~en to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was o~~en to
and used by motor vehicles.
5. That this Board does certify that speculative int ests
are not involved.
6. That said road known as Memory Lane and which is
on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and t
same is hereby established as a public road to become a par of
the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, o y
from and after notification of official acceptance of said reet
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
February 9, 1988 4
- n ------- - -----_-- ---- ---- ------------- _--- ---- ----- -- --
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
ers, and upon the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
S: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.k REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
LAKEMONT DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
~unty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.i requesting acceptance of
kemont Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby
scinded
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
roceedings therein and upon the application for Lakemont Drive,
section of road extending from Club Lane (Route 1443), 0.15
files west of Valley Drive (Route 1442), and extending in a
esterly and then easterly direction 0.56 miles to the cul-de-sac
ursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant
o Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of
950, as amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
irginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 40 feet with necessary
49 ~
February 9, 1988
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 5, ated
August 13, 1974 and deed book , page of reco in
the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was o~en to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was o n to
and used by motor vehicles.
5. That this Board does certify that speculative int~rests
are not involved.
6. That said road known as Lakemont Drive and which s
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, nd
the same is hereby established as a public road to become a art
of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said reet
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Superviso
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar tt
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.1 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
SHADOW LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
49'7
February 9, 1988
--- - - --
1. That Resolution 6987-12.e requesting acceptance of
Lane into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby
scinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
therein and upon the application for Shadow Lane,
section of road extending from Lamplighter Drive (Route 1583),
.06 miles west of Lantern Street (Route 1598) and extending in a
ly direction 0.04 miles to Shadow Lane (Route to be
signed, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded
suant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of
'~irginia of 1950, as amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
is an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
s for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 25, dated
8, 1969 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court
erk's Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
.ic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
used by motor vehicles.
5. That this Board does certify that speculative interests
not involved.
6. That said road known as Shadow Lane and which is shown
a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the
is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
49 ~
February 9, 1988 -
-- , -
the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, or~~.y
from and after notification of official acceptance of said ~~treet
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervi
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers,
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 2988-7.m REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
INDIAN HILL ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.g requesting acceptance of
t
Indian Hill Road into the VDOT Secondary Road System is her~~y
rescinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon t
proceedings therein and upon the application for Indian Hil
Road, a section of road extending from Westward Lake Drive (IKoute
1146), 0.05 miles east of Ingal Blvd. (Route 1119) and ext ding
in a northwesterly direction 0.20 miles to Mountain Park Dr' e
(Route 1157), pursuant. to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1
funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Coc
of
Virginia of 1950, as amended.
4y9
February 9, 1988 -
---i __ _ _ - - - - _ __ .
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
rginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
sements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 200,
ted February 23, 1956 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit
urt Clerk's Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
ublic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
nd used by motor vehicles.
5. That this Board does certify that speculative interests
re not involved.
6. That said road known as Indian Hill Road and which is
hown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and
he same is hereby established as a public road to become a part
f the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only
rom and after notification of official acceptance of said street
r highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Hers, and upon the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
S: None
RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
5uo
February 9, 1988
_-
I~--- - --
Mrs. Rose Lester spoke representing The Alliance r
the Mentally 111 of the Roanoke Valley and the mother of a
handicapped child. She outlined the needs of the mentally 1 in
the Roanoke. Valley regarding housing, emergency services an case
management for the board's future consideration.
Mrs. Rita Gliniecki spoke representing The Mental
Health Association of Roanoke Valley, an organization affil' ted
with the Make Waves Coalition. She outlined the budget sit tion
at the state level and urged Roanoke County to respond to
requests for funds to meet the remaining needs of our menta y
disabled citizens.
Chairman Garrett told Mrs. Lester and Mrs. Gliniec~~si
that the board would take their comments under advisement d~~ring
budget preparations.
Supervisor Johnson advised that it has been twent
years since we de-institutionalized some of our facilities d it
would be interesting to note if the officials here think th has
worked and if their funding from the state is similar to th
school funding problems.
IN RE: REPORTS
501
February 9,1988
-r _ --_ __.---------___ _ -__ - --___ -------- -
ll-- 1I
1. Fourth Quarter, 1987, Development Data Report with
mary of Activity was received and filed.
RE: RECESS
Chairman Garrett declared a five minute recess to
for the budget preparation.
2. Budcret Presentation
County Administrator Hodge advised that he and staff
bring the board up to date on the budget process. This is
first of a planned series of meetings. The staff will review
projections of revenues for next year, and look at several of
major expenditures. It will not include departmental or
chool expenses.
Mr. Hodge reviewed the priorities set by the board last
ber. The next step is the determination of available
ues. No new additional sources of revenues, such as meals
has been included in these figures.
Mr. Hodge summarized the major projections of revenues
d expenditures. All of the new revenues from the reassessment
502
February 9, 1988
- -- --Ti --_._...
of real estate, proration of personal property, amount to $2 152
million. This is the available, additional new revenue. The e
are some commitments which must be completed and taken from hose
revenues. Debt Service $l.l million includes school and cou ty
increases over last year but does not include the reservoir.
The airport is funded at $264,000 and this is the first year of
the full payments to the airport. This leaves $726,000 that can
be considered in the budget request for both schools and cou ty,
with the existing tax structure. There are several figures hick
must be included. Every l~ increase for county salaries is
$166,000. The 7.3~ school salary mandate will cost $2.5 mill on.
Merit increases for county employees would require $830,000.
Some priority issues are Valleypointe $100,000, Volunteer
Retirement Program for fire and rescue personnel $125,000 an
public information officer $40,000. There are a number of c unty
issues involved in preparing the budget. One is employee
benefits, salary increases for county employees as well as f r
the schools, public safety, economic development and departm ntal
requests. Last year departmental requests of approximately and
one-half to 3 million dollars were cut to balance the budget
At the end of the budget process, the county administrator w 11
present a budget both balanced and within the existing tax r te,
which is required by law. Those items unable to be funded wi 1 be
shown.
503
February 9, 1988
--, _ -
__ __ - -
-- --- - -------- ----n----
Mr. Hodge pointed out that the county is seeing a
of revenues, a slowing of the growth rate, and this
we may have to rethink the delivery of some of our
Supervisor Johnson asked under debt services if we have
list of projects funded but not started. Mr. Hodge responded
only three projects have not begun and one is the reservoir.
sor Johnson pointed out that the consumer price index went
in this country by 4.4$. School salary mandate is 7.3~ for
achers only and other school employees would get another
The board should set a high priority for the county
es increase. Mr. Hodge agreed that a high priority has
placed on that. It would be very helpful to have the same
glary increase for non-teaching staff as the county staff. Mr.
ohnson advised that this suggestion had been
ayed to school officials.
Supervisor Nickens asked about the other two projects
but not started. Mr. Hodge responded that these are the
~ack Creek and Bent Mountain Schools. Bonsack Fire Station has
of begun or William Byrd Junior School. Mr. Hodge added that
hese are projects that have been identified for a number of
onths or years. Supervisor Nickens felt that there was a
#ommitment to these long-time projects and they must be projected
5U4
February 9, 1988 -
-- - -„ _ --
into the budget process to maintain the integrity of Roanoke
County government.
Reta Busher, Director of the Budget, reported that .they
evaluated all financial data, current and historial, reviewe
potential growth based on market conditions and conferred wi h
other county departments. They also analyzed the accuracy o the
current year's revenue projections based on the first six mo the
of operation and adjusted next year's projection based on th se
findings. The total projected revenues of the general fund or
fiscal year 1988-89, assuming no change in tax rates, or sou ce
of revenue, is $55,730,000, a net increase of $2.1 million, r 4$.
The real estate assessments are made on a calendar basis whi e
tax revenues are based on fiscal year basis. The real estate
projection for fiscal year 88/89 is based on current tax rat s,
assessments as of January 1, and growth factor. Assessments at
January 1, 1988, were slightly higher than was estimated las
year which will provide additional revenue this year.
Mrs. Busher advised that the county will have a ne
increase of $2.1 million. The percentage increase is less in
fiscal year 88/89 than in prior years because the county has not
established new programs such as annualized reassessment,
proration of personal property and new utility consumer tax.
Supervisor Johnson asked that $175,000 be pulled o t
from under local revenue of $2,050,773 and foot-noted for fu ure
50~
February 9, 1988 -
discussions..- This was for the Red Lane Annexation
tlement, one-time, non-reoccuring capital.
Reta Busher continued that the four sources of revenue
identified as refuse fee at $4.00 for $1,200,000, meals. tax
approved by legislature for $1,200,000, utility consumer tax
change from 6~ to 10~) for $866,000 or raise .O1 on real estate
ax rate for $230,000.
A capsule summary of debt service for 88/89 and 89/90
s presented. The $1.1 million difference includes the
of paybacks for VPSA projects, Back Creek and Bent
which we are in the process of borrowing. The bonds
or the reservoir are reflected in 89/90 of $1.6 million.
Supervisor Nickens asked why we underestimated the
r vehicle license tax for decal fee? Mrs. Busher responded
they cannot obtain a real reason why it was under in 86/87
to be on the conservative side, figures were adjusted
ward. The tax impact is just carrying over. Supervisor
ickens remarked that the decal fee then was $15.00 and now is
0.00 and there are more automobiles now on county roadways than
1986.
Supervisor Johnson asked if we could get an estimate as
how many unregistered vehicles we have? Mrs. Busher said that
could ask the Commissioner of Revenue's office. Supervisor
ckens asked Paul Mahoney about the status of the provision in
506
February 9, 1988
--- -- - - ------ - --- - ----r
_ ~ - _ ,`_ ---tr-----_ --
.the charter which deals with decals. County Attorney Mahon
said that this was removed from the proposed charter bill i
committee. Supervisor Nickens suggested hiring some rising
college seniors in the summer months, to identify cars with t
decals instead of using the Commissioner's staff. It is imp tant
to make sure all people who reside in the county are paying heir
share of the taxes due the county before adding additional xes.
Chairman Garrett asked Mr. Hodge to work through is
suggestion and report back to the board. He also suggested o
Mr. Hodge that he think in terms of tightening up mechanism for
savings money between various agencies.
IN RE: AWARDING OF EMPLOYEE SERVICE PINS AND RECEPTION
County Administrator Hodge announced that employe
with five, ten, fifteen, twenty and twenty-five years exper' nce
will be recognized by receiving service awards.
Human Resources Director Keith Cook said that thi year
each employee will be presented with a certificate of recog 'tion
and following the award ceremony, the employee may select a
county service pin or another engraved award for their years~lof
service. After the certificates were presented, group
photographs were taken.
February 9, 1988
....50'7
Employees with five years service can choose between a
terling silver pin, stering silver keyring, or stainless Cross
. Those with five years' service are Lois Boliek, Diane Hyatt,
rt Jernigan, Peter Coleman, Berkley Robertson, :Barry Mills,
illiam Bowling, Walter Eanes, James Hicks, Ida McIlwraith,
lliam Patsel, Bobby Richardson, Allen Bober, Sharon Brown,
les Beckner, Rodney Ferguson, Phillip Boblett and Betty
The employees with ten years' service have a choice of
gold-filled County pin, classic black Cross pen set, or
awed bowl. These recipients were Nedra Crockett, Gloria
oolridge, Nancy Wright, Charlie Altice, John Hubbard, Debbie
aster Harris, Michael McGuire, Stephen Turner, Arthur Lee,
~ack Beville, William Crozier, Dennis Fisher, Thomas Fuqua, Jo
mith, James St. Clair, James Poindexter, Gary Creasy, Walter
avis, Gary Huff, William Sowers, Cheryl Childress, Joyce Harvey,
erry Lewis, Joseph Santos, and Maxine Crutchfield.
The fifteen year awards are the 10 kt. gold county pin
ith birthstone, knife with county logo on case or engraved
ometer. The recepients are Richard Brizendine, David Miller,
Marshall, Clarence Simmons, Gloria Divers, John Saunders,
rge Garretson, William Harbor, Deborah Pitts, Harry Parker,
y Atkins, Cynthia Compton, Mildred Daugherty, and Cordelia
raper.
5U8
February 9, 1988
-- --~ II------ ----- -~
For twenty years and each successive five years, e
award is the 10 kt. gold county pin with diamond chip, desk
clock., county ring, wall clock or luggage with engraved pla
The recipients are Margaret Reynolds, Dana Gibson, Margaret itt,
Darrell Shell, Robert Lipes, 0. S. Foster, and Elizabeth St es.
There was one twenty-five year award made to Euge
Grubb in Parks & Recreation Department.
IN RE: RECEPTION AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 4:30 p.m., Vice-Chairman Robers invited everyo
stay for the reception immediately following the service aw
and made a motion that the board go into Executive Session
pursuant to Code 2.1-344 (a) (1) to discuss a personnel mat
(2) to discuss a real estate matter and (6) to discuss a le
matter. No action is anticipated. The meeting will then be
adjourned until 6:00 p.m. for a joint work session with the
chiefs and rescue captains. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Johnson and carried by unanimous voice vote.
to
ds
IEire
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
Soy
February 9, 1988
At 6:10 p.m., Supervisor Garrett ,moved to return to
Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
tarried by unanimous voice vote.
N RE: WORK SESSION
This was a joint work session with the board and the
unteer fire and rescue personnel. Chief Gillespie of the
~olunteer fire department addressed the board concerning their
eeds and priorities. He also thanked the board for the support
hey showed the fire and rescue department over the previous
ears. He said their budget request this year would be just over
2 million for serving the population of over 80,000 people.
thief Gillespie asked that the board evaluate what the paid and
'olunteer services are providing for the citizens of this county.
Chief Gillespie expressed his thoughts about the budget
ackage, requests, add-backs, and the benefits package. They
ant the benefits package to be comfortable and desirable for
ryone.
A list of things were identified which were unfunded to
e added back if money is available. These included personnel
lert devices, radios, personnel pagers, phone units,
elf-contained breathing apparatus, fire hose, replacement of two
~1~
February 9, 1988
cars, and contagious disease kit supplies. ,These items are
needed to enhance the equipment or improve the performance o the
people. These eight items totaled $159,000.
Some equipment needs replacing on the five year pl n.
Vehicle Tanker 4 has been on replacement list for two years t
$1.80,000. The Back Creek Fire Station has requested a new
engine, $200,000.
Bent Mountain for two years has had a problem
insufficient number of people to respond during daylight ho s.
They have requested that they be staffed with paid personnel
during daylight hours. Total expenditure for one year for
personnel would be $95,000.
In response to questions from Supervisor Johnson, hief
Gillespie said they operated last year with $1.8 million an
the request this year is $2.88 million which included 5~ ste
increase for staff.
Captain Larry Wirt went through the requests from he
rescue board and some of the background of what they did in 987.
He discussed a summary of the calls made by fire stations an
rescue as to number and cost per call for 1986 and 1987, so
listed was the total number of training hours that it takes ~o
earn each qualification.
Captain Wirt listed the priorty of add backs for ~he
Rescue Captains Board, which included protective clothing,
511
February 9, 1988
personnel for Rescue 3, ambulance w/ALS equipment, ALS equipment
'or Rescue 4, pagers, hepatitis vaccine, and self contained
thing apparatus, totaling $271,600.
The Captains Board put together a safety policy, SOP,
Captain Wirt pointed out that it is imperative that we
ect the people in the rescue squads and fire departments.
No. 1 priority on add-back is protective clothing at cost of
70,000 or $355 per person with 197 people.
Captain Wirt discussed the benefits program and the
act that it may keep some existing crew people and help to
ecruit some people. Supervisor Nickens stated that as a board,
were already on record as supporting the benefits package.
of Gillespie added that this would be a great help in keeping
ur 553 volunteers.
Chief Gillespie introduced to the board the members of
the fire and rescue department who were in attendance at the work
~esssion.
~N RE: RECESS
Chairman Garrett declared a five-minute recess.
512.
February 9, 1988
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources Departmen
briefed the board on payment of overtime versus accrual of
compensatory time for the Sheriff's Department.
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 7:40 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn
meeting. The motion was seconded by Chairman Garrett and c ried
by a unanimous voice vote.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
February. 23, 1988 5 1 3
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
February 23, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
:ounty, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February,
.988.
RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 2:05
.m. The roll call was taken.
PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
ERS ABSENT: None
TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Management Services; John
R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala,
Assistant County Administrator for
514
,February 23, 1988
Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deput
Clerk.; Phillip Henry, Director of
Engineering; Diane Hyatt, Director Fin
IN RE:
WORK SESSION ON DRAINAGE
Director of Engineering Phillip Henry presented an~
overview of the drainage program. The county has received 2
drainage complaints since May 1987. They have held eleven
community meetings with the citizens throughout the county.
of the drainage complaints are divided into three areas of
responsibility. The Virginia Department of Transportation i
responsible for drainage within road right-of-ways, and drai
easements acquired by VDOT and easements upstream and downst'
of right-of-ways. Roanoke County is responsible for drainag
easements for stormwaters leaving right-of-way of state
maintained roads and is responsible for keeping drainage
easements clear beyond VDOT's responsibility. Property owne
are responsible for certain drainage problems also. Follow
the work session he requested that the Board give the staff
direction on how they should pursue the drainage program.
Assistant Director of Engineering George Simpson
bo
e;
Most
gage
am
s
reviewed the list of prioritized projects that meet the crit~ria
for drainage responsibility for Roanoke County. The total
estimated cost is $266,000.- He also presented a list of maj~r
drainage projects which totaled $10,945,000. Mr. Henry advi~ed
51:5
February 23, 1988
hat many of the drainage problems concern erosion control and
equested that Arnold Covey from Development Review discuss that
ssue. Mr. Covey described-the erosion control violation
rocedure which is set by .state code. He advised that the only
lternative to following this procedure would be to use the
rainage program to correct the violations.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the drainage
aintenance philosophy as outlined in the work session and to
pprove the prioritized list of maintenance projects. The motion
as seconded by Supervisor McGraw. Supervisor Johnson asked that
he motion be amended to request that the Sheriff's Department be
otified about the potential use of non-violent repeat offenders
n the drainage program. The motion carried by the following
ecorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
S: None
Mr. Hodge advised that they will bring back a report in
e months advising the board of what projects have been
leted.
RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
516
February 23; 1988'
_.. -- - --
----- ---
~- _._
- --
___ _ _ _ _
_ _ ~~_ ._.
The invocation was given by The Reverend Alan
Rowbotham, Unity of Roanoke Valley Church.. The Pledge of
Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE; PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDH
County Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson presented a fr
letter from U. S. President Ronald Reagan congratulating tho
elected officials who took office on January 1, 1988. He
requested that it be hung in an appropriate place.
IN RE; NEW BUSINESS
1. A royal of Resolution re estin the Federal
~e
Creek: Director of Engineering Phillip Henry reported that tihe
Flood Insurance Study was completed in October 1978. In 198
one of the property owners did a survey and FEMA did the
evaluation and determined that the flood elevation at Branha dt
Creek was in error by four feet. Other property owners in t e
vicinity of Farmingdale South have requested that the flood
elevations be reviewed. Based on discussions with FEMA ther is
money allocated to do this study if Roanoke County requests t.
d
51'7 !.
February 23, 1988
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the resolution
equesting a restudy of Barnardt Creek by FEMA. The motion was
econded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following
ecorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
RESOLUTION 22388-2 REQUESTING FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO COMPLETE A RESTUDY OF
BARNHARDT CREEK
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
y, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
roceedings herein.
2. That the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County,
irginia with an effective date of October 17, 1978 has been
ed and used by the Roanoke County government.
3. That the Flood Insurance Study was revised on December
1985 to reflect errors in field data along portions of
arnhardt Creek.
4. That there is evidence to indicate that the field data
long the full section of Barnhardt Creek, being that portion
ithin Roanoke County, Virginia is in error and that a restudy is
ecessary to have correct information concerning the 100 year
lood plain, and other related flood data.
51g
February 23, 1988
5. That the restudy is important to various property
owners within the County and the restudy could result in the
elimination of unnecessary hardship to these property owners
there is a need to proceed expeditiously with this study.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Super isor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2. Elimination of Ridership Fees for CORTRAN
Program: Director of Finance Diane Hyatt advised that sinc
July 1, 1987, the County has contracted with RADAR to provid
this service to the citizens at a cost of $60,000. It is
presently taking 20 hours of staff time and printing and pos age
costs to distribute the tickets which are sold for $1.50 eac .
It is therefore costing about $6,000 but bringing in only $3 00
in revenue. It would be more cost effective to allow citize s to
ride on the CORTRAN system free. Elderly citizens would pre ent
their League of Older Americans card, and handicapped citize s
would present their Easter Seal card. Staff is therefore
recommending the elimination of ridership fees for the COR
program.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGra~ and
carried by the following recorded vote:
~Y9
February 23, 1988
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens,-Garrett
S: None
3. Adoption of a Resolution authorizinq issuance of
z Assistant County Administrator John
hambliss these bonds were previously authorized by the Board of
upervisors for water and sewer projects. $3.7 million of these
rojects were approved by a referendum in 1974, the remaining
1.6 are from the 1986 bond referendum. The interest rate for
hese bonds is approximately 7.9 percent. Because these two
eferendum were approved prior to July 1, 1987, they do not come
!~ nder the public hearing requirement as will other bond issues.
taff recommend the adoption of the resolution authorizing the
ssuance of the bonds.
Supervisor Nickens asked what the impact of these bonds
ill have on future water rates. Mr. Chambliss responded they
re getting data together for budget projections. Supervisor
ohnson pointed out that the main reason for the high water rates
s the cost to purchase water from the City of Roanoke
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the resolution.
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
llowing recorded vote:
ES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
~i 2 0
February 23, 1988
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000
WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS
THEREOF
The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a poli~
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for
has received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virgin
Resources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of t
County's existing water system. The County will issue its W
local
land
ter
System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the ori~inal
principal amount of $960,000, and sell the Local Bond to the~~Au-
thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loa~.
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the fo.~low-
ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this me ting
and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreem nt,
dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between t e
Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local and
attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Su
ted
i-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that:
521
February 23, 1988
1. Definitions. Unless otherwise. defined, all capital-
zed terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings set
orth in the Financing Agreement.
2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a revenue
and of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Virgin-
a, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The
oval Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount of
960,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price set
orth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby
etermined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth of
irginia and the County.
3. Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Finan-
ing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board
F Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of
ze County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub-
Ltted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis-
Lons as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be
~idenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof.
ie Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors
'Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County
lministrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management
rvices ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of
ilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe-
to and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments,
522
February 23, 1988
documents or certificates, and to do and perform s
acts, as the uch thin and
y shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry ut
the transactions authorized by this Resoluti
the Local Bond or the Financin °ri or contempla ed by
g Agreement, and all of the f re-
going, previously done or
performed by the Chairman, the C1 rk,
the Treasurer, the. County Administrator, the Assis
Administrator or the Director Cant Coun y
are in all respects approved, rat-
ified and confirmed.
4 ' ~ai1 of Loc•a 1 Rn.,a
..u. The Local Bond shall
issued as a fully registered bond without coupons i
tion of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1 n the den mina-
Bond shall bear interest at the rates ind' ' 1988. The Loca
icated below, and t e
principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to ri _
demption, on November 1 in each of the p or
amounts set forth below: Years and in the paym t
Principal
Payment
Amo-- unt
$20, 000
25, 000
25, 000
25, 000
30,000
30,000
35,000
35, 000
35, 000
40,000
40, 000
45, 000
45, 000
50, 000
55, 000
Principal
Payment
Due Date
November 1, 1988
November 1, 1989
November 1, 199p
November 1, 1991
November 1, 1992
November 1, 1993
November 1, 1994
November 1, 1995
November 1, 1996
November 1, 1997
November 1, lggg
November 1, 1999
November 1, 2000
November 1, 2001
November 1, 2002
Interest
4. $
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.6
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.1
February 23, 1988
X23
60,000 November 1, 2003 7.2
65,000 November 1, 2004 7.3
65,000 November 1, 2005 7.35
.70,000. November 1, 2006 7.4
80,000 November 1, 2007 7.45
85,000 November 1, 2008 7.5
Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear
nterest at its respective interest rate from the date of the
vocal Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In addi-
ion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in
he Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest
s not received within five days of its due date. Interest on
he Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360
ays and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if
ny, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place
nd in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement.
Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to
payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the provi-
ions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged
o secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any,
interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the
unty's obligations under the Financing Agreement.
The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on
Local Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United
ates of America only from the Revenues and other sources
ledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and
Financing Agreement.
524
February 23, 1988
---------- ---- ----- ------
5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond sha be
subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreeme
6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of D ault
shall have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount f
and accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared imme 'ate-
ly due and payable by written notice to the County.
7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shal be
signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman nd
the Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a fa im-
il~ of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be atte ed
by the manual or facsimile signature of the Cleric. In case ny
officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shal
cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local B d,
such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient fc~~r all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office un '1
such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such person as
at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the pr er
officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of de 'very
of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such offi rs.
8. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be b-
stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financi
Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and ser-
tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Fi n-
sing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond su
525
February 23, 1988
legend or text as may be necessary or .appropriate to conform to
y applicable rules and regulations of any governmental autho-
ity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto.
9. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County
appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to
eep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond
to make such registration and transfers under such reasonable
lations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local
nd at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and
liver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local
and or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur-
and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest
t the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each
ase to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe.
f presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the
ocal Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru-
°nts of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub-
tance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by
ze registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-
~ct or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis-
:red to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex-
ge shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the
5 ~ V February 23, 1988
same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured bv~~this
Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all o the
security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
surrendered.
10. Chartres for Exchange or Transfer. No charge hall
be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but he
County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond o~' a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge
may be imposed in relation thereto.
11. Temt~orarv Typewritten Local Bond. The County
initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the
Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request
that
may
ocal
of
the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the
Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pr -
pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local B nd
in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and f r
the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Ap~ro-
priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in t
Local Bond to facilitate printing.
12.
If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destro ed,
the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond of lik
date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon de iv-
ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local ond,
February. 23, 1988
5 2 "7
~r in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de-
troyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall exe-
ute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the regis-
.ered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges
~f the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost,
tolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evi-
ence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or
estroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis-
ered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem-
ity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead
f issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without
render thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in-
ity.
13. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion
f the information with respect to the County contained in the
ection "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
ared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre-
ng Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby
atified and confirmed and the use of such information in final
orm in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho-
ized and approved; provided, however, such information contained
n the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the
ssistant County Administrator before the distribution of the
offering Statement.
528
February 23, 1988
-- - -
-- -
14. Filing of Resolution• Notice. The Chairman
the Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or
cause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with t e
Circuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-19 and
15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and wi hin
ten days thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of genera
circulation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brie and
general terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be
issued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond.
15. Conflicting Resolutions. All parts of resolu~
of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are
by rescinded and repealed.
16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take e:
immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Superv~
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
IN RE; REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
1. Recruest to reschedule work session on Roanoke
River Tributaries Steams Study by Corps of Encxineers- Chai
ions
re- ~
~fect
~sor
Garrett advised that this work session has been continued untgil
February 23, 1988
rch 22, 1988 and Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard is
o work with the Corps of Engineers.
2: Work Session with the School Board for budget
_ Supervisor Johnson requested a work session with
School Board. Chairman Garrett advised that a work session
tentatively been set for March 22, 1988. He suggested that
he work session with the Corps of Engineer be kept open and that
joint work session with the School Board be set for March
2nd.
RE; APPOINTMENTS
1. Health Department Board of Directors•
rvisor Nickens nominated Susan Adcock to serve a two year
erm expiring November 26, 1989.
2. Grievance Panel• Supervisor Robers nominated
Owens to serve his unexpired two-year term which will expire
ember 27, 1989.
RE; REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson requested a study on the
alities and feasibilities of considering schools as community
530
February 23, 1988
centers and allowing the use of these facilities for other
purposes.
Supervisor Robers advised he had contacted Dr. Wad
Gilley at George Mason University concerning his study of
southwest Virginia and he has agreed to meet with Mr. Robers
Supervisor Mcgraw announced there had been two
meetings of the VACO/VML Committee on annexation. They will
a recommendation to the Grayson Commission in July and Octob
Supervisor Garrett announced that he and Mr. Hodge
had met with their counterparts in the City of Roanoke, Fran
County, Bedford County, and Botetourt County, and had establ5
a dialog with all localities.
IN RE; CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Garrett moved that the Consent Agenda ~
approved with the removal of Item 1. The motion was seconde
Supervisor Robers and carried by a unanimous voice vote.
On Item 1, Confirmation of Committee Appointments,
Supervisor Garrett .requested that the appointment of Eugene
Martin to the Grievance Panel is the replacement for Joe Hi
not Richard Robers.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve Item 1 as
make
r.
in
by
~,
February 23, 1988
531
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. The motion was
~arried by a unanimous voice vote.
RESOLUTION N0. 22388-7 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
~oard of Supervisors for February 23, 1988, designated as Item I
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
o each item separately set forth in said section designated
terns 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Grievance Panel and Transportation and Safety
Commission.
2. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the 0.49 miles of Route 1950
(Forest Edge Drive has been accepted into the
Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center.
5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Meadow Creek, Section 3.
6. Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
532
' February 23, 1988
7. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
Jaycees.
8. Resolution from the Planning Commission
recommending approval of acquisition of 5.177
.acre tract for fire and rescue facilities in
Back Creek community planning area.
9. Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic
Landmarks grant for roof replacement on the O1
County Courthouse
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authoriz
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuan
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett after removing It et
for amendment and discussion, seconded by Supervisor Robers,
upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Supervisor Garrett advised that Item 1 should be
amended to reflect that Eugene Martin is replacing Joe Himes
the Grievance Panel. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve It
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
recorded vote:
he
aid
to
1
and
on
1.
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt
NAYS: None
A M E N D E D
RESOLUTION 22388-7.C REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
.. ~. 3 4
February 23, 1988
5. That said road .known as Hill Drive and which is sh wn
on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be,-and th
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, on y
from and after notification of official acceptance of said s reet
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Super
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 22388-7.g REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
OLD MANOR DRIVE AND OLD MANOR COURT INTO THE VIRGI
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon t
visor
f IA
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Old Manor Dr ve,
from Lot 6, Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estate ,
and Old Manor Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Dr
to the cul-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates t~ be
accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easement
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been II
535
February 23, 1988
edicated by virtue of a certain map known as Plantation Estates
ubdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 9, of
he records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
ounty, Virginia, on May 22, 1986 and that by reason of the
ecordation of .said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
onsent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
wners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
fight-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Old Manor Drive and Old Manor
ourt which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
esolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
oads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
n Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
~ceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
E Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
~bers, and upon the following recorded vote:
!ES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
~YS: None
RESOLUTION 22388-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ty, Virginia, as follows
536
February 23, 1988
.~, r
~•
1• That
Resolution 6987-12,h is requestin
Airpoint Drive and g accepta
Airpoint Road e of
System into the VDOT Secondary R ad
is hereby rescinded.
2• That this
matter came this da
proceedings therein Y to be heard
and u upon e
pon the application for
and Airpoint Road Airpoint
. a section of road ive
Road (Route 221), 0.09 extending from Bent Mo
miles north of Tinsle ntdin
and extendin Y Lane (Route 7 1),
g in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Air of
Drive and 0.25 miles to Airpoint Road to a p
to Section 33.1-72.1 turn around, pur ant
Paragraph C-1 and funded
Section 33.1-75.1 pursuant to
Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 19 0,
as amended.
3• That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with neces
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46 s Y
dated Jul g '
Y 1965 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Co rt
Clerk's Office.
4• That this Board does certif
y that this road was ope to
public use prior to Januar 1
Y 1976, at which time it was ope to
and used by motor vehicles.
5• That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Air oin
Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanyin th'p
resolution be g is
and the same are hereby established as publi
roads to become a part of the state secondary system of hi hw
g' a s
February 23, 1988 _ J 3
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
ceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
~f Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
obers, and upon the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
RE; REPORTS
The following reports were received and filed.
1. Accounts Paid for January 1988.
2. Board Contingency Fund
3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. Capital Unappropriated Balance
5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability as of
uary 31, 1988.
6. Financial Statements as of January 1, 1988.
7. Status of Starkey Road Improvement Project.
Supervisor Johnson asked the staff to investigate
ther the Capital Unappropriated Balance could be used for our
ligation to the regional airport. He also asked for a listing,
department, of how many unfilled positions exist in the
Supervisor Nickens suggested that funds in the
_538
February 23,.1988
Commissioner of Revenue's budget or funds in the Board
Contingency Fund be used for a part-time person to work on
finding vehicles without county decals. Mr. Hodge requested
he and the Commissioner of Revenue study this issue and brin
back a report to the board. Supervisor Nickens moved that
Mr.Hodge and the Commissioner of Revenue bring back to the B
at the first meeting in April a program for enforcement of t
decal fee in Roanoke County. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE; EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 3:45 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2,1-344
2, and 6, to to consider a personnel matter, to consider a r
estate matter and to discuss a legal matter. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr
NAYS: None
that
yard
1,
al
Ott
IN RE; OPEN SESSION
February 23, 1988
---- ~--- ------ ---rr
At 5:00 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to return to
Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
rried by the following recorded vote:
YES:.. Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
~N RE; RECESS
At 5:01 Chairman Garrett declared a dinner recess.
RE; RECOVENEMENT
At 7:04 p.m. Chairman Garrett reconvened the meeting.
RE; PUBLIC HEARINGS
288-1 Petition of Brambleton Medical
Associates to amend the Roanoke County
Land Use Plan and to rezone a 1.48 acre
tract from R-1, Residential to B-1,
Business to construct a parking lot,
located south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue
in the Cave Spring Magisterial District
(CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 1988)
Director of Planning Rob Stalzer announced that The
Canning Commission has decided that future amendments to the
540
February 23, 1988
Land Use Plan will be considered concurrently with the propo
rezoning. Mr. Stalzer pointed out that the present Land Use
must be amended to conform with the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Stalzer presented the staff report stating tha
led
(Plan
the
purpose for the rezoning was to construct a parking lot to s rve
an existing office complex and a proposed addition to the co Alex.
The petitioners are in violation of the zoning setback
regulations, but this is an administrative matter, separate rom
the issues before the Board. The Land Use Plan designates t is
property Neighborhood Conservation and in order to bring the plan
into compliance it would be necessary to amend the Plan to
Transition. The Planning Commission recommends approval of
both the Land Use Plan and the rezoning with proffered
conditions.
John Molumphy, attorney for Brambleton Medical
Associates, requested a thirty day continuance on this petit on
because they feel there are additional issues to be resolved
before the Board should vote on this matter.
Chairman Garrett responded that before a decision
the continuance would be made they would hear from the citiz~ns
who wished to speak.
Speaking in opposition to the proposed Land Use
Amendment and the rezoning were:
- --
541
February 23, 1988
1. Irwin Holtzman, 3511 Forester Road S. W. spoke
sing the amendment of the Land Use Plan because of the
ortance of maintaining the environment of their Greenwood
rest neighborhood.
2. Allen Trigger, 3519 Forester Road S.W. spoke in
position to the rezoning. His property is directly adjacent to
petitioner.
3. Ellen Holtzman, 3511 Forester Road S.W. spoke
rning the violation of the buffer zone in the previous
rezoning.
4. Amy Collins, 3535 Forester Road S. W. voiced
:oncern for lowered property values, potential buglaries and
fighting from the parking.
5. Horace McPherson, 3561 Forester Road, spoke in
sition also.
Mr. Molumphy responded that the County as previously
ded the Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Conservation to
ransition. He also presented two letters in support of the
zoning.
Chairman Garrett advised that he did not feel it
cessary to continue this issue for another thirty days.
Supervisor Robers moved to deny the rezoning. The
ion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
542.
February 23, 1988
In response to a question by Supervisor Nickens, C~unty
Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that both the Land Use Plan an~ the
rezoning should be voted on separately.
Supervisor Robers withdrew his motion for denial o~ the
rezoning and moved to deny the Land Use Plan Amendment. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr
NAYS: None
Supervisor Robers moved to deny the rezoning.
t
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by then
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr~tt
NAYS: None
288-2 Public Hearing on Ordinance amending
Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code,
"EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED
PERSONS and reenacting same to increase
the total combined income and total
combined net worth
County Attorney Paul Mahoney explained this was
public hearing portion of the proposed ordinance amending t
code for elderly and disabled persons. The second reading o the
ordinance will be held later in the meeting. The public hea ing
will allow citizen comment. This ordinance changes the Coun
--
February 23, 1988
543
allowing exemption from additional real estate taxes to
rease the total income provision from .$18,000 to $22,000 and
o change the net worth provision from $65,00.0 to $75,000. This
ill take the County to the ceiling allowed by the General
sembly.
No citizens were present to speak to this proposed
finance.
~88-3 Public Hearing for citizen input on
local community development and housing
needs, and on the proposed application
for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING FOR TWEEDS, INC economic
development project.
Economic Development Specialist Brent Sheffler reported
hat the County has an opportunity to apply for a Community
evelopment Block Grant for TWEEDS, Inc. which will located on
he Roanoke County-Botetourt County site. This application will
rovide an opportunity for on-site and off-site improvements
uch as water and sewer extensions, acquisition and site grading.
ze funding request is for $500,000 to cover these improvement.
ach County will be applying for $250,000. Industrial access
unding will be a separate request by Botetourt County. The
lic hearing is mandated to allow for citizen comment on this
ant request and previous grant requests. It is projected that
S will provide jobs for low to moderate income people.
544
' February 23, 1988
- --~
n_..___
County Administrator asked what the cutoff date wa~ for
application for these grant funds. Mr. Sheffler said the fist
application deadline is March 4, 1988 at 5:00 p.m. The seco~d
deadline is every month thereafter, but it is important to
to expedite this application. A second public hearing is also
required for the other deadline.
No one was present to speak on this issue.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution.
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 22388-8 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF
APPLICATION FOR 1988 VIRGINIA COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will submit
1988 regional application for Virginia Community Development)
Block Grant (VCDBG) funds, and
WHEREAS, This regional project's name is the Twe
S
The
t
a
Inc. Economic Development Project, and
545
February 23, 1988
----
--------- -----
WHEREAS, Roanoke County will request $250,000 of VCDBG
~unds, and Botetourt County will request $250,000 in similar
and
WHEREAS, Up to $300,000 from the Virginia Department of
ransportation Industrial Access Fund Program will be used to
ide an access road to the project site, and
WHEREAS, Up to 108 low and moderate income persons are
ojected to receive employment from this project, and
WHEREAS, Citizen participation requirements have been
omplied with through a duly publicized public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Roanoke County
rd of Supervisors authorizes the County Administrator to sign
d submit all appropriate information and documents necessary to
titute an application for 1988 VCDBG funds.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
aw, and upon the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
8-4 Petition of GEORGE JACOBS To rezone a
0.678 acre tract from B-2, Business to M-
1, Industrial to assembly musical
accessories, located at 6024 Williamson
Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District
Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported
546
February 23, 1988
~~ --- -
that this petition allows for an industry on what is conside ed
Neighborhood Conservation. The Planning Commission felt tha
this designation, made in 1985, was inaccurate and should be
Transition. At the Planning Commission hearing there was
citizens opposition concerning property values, dust, noise nd
odor pollution. There are .proffered conditions to the propo ed
rezoning. The Planning Commission recommended approval 4 to 0.
Supervisor Johnson agreed that this property shoul not
be designated Neighborhood Conservation. He advised that he did
not want to include the condition that stated that the prope ty
would revert to B-2 zoning should the proposed use be termin ted.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the rezoning
the first three proffered conditions only. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
rith
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr~tt
None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax aps
as Parcel 38.06-2-2 and recorded in Deed Book 698 and legall
described below; be rezoned from B-2 Business District to M-
Industrial District
-~+
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
pf Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a point on the
westerly side of U.S. Route No. 11
100.0 ft. (erroneously shown as "11
ft." in previous deed) southerly
from the intersection of the
westerly side of Route 11 and the
southerly side of route 623, both
extended; thence with a division
line between Lots 12-B and 12-C, S.
78 degrees, 1' 30" W. 200.17 feet
to an iron on the line of Lot 11;
thence N. 0 degrees 0' 30" W.
222.25 ft. to an old iron on route
623; thence with the southerly side
of Route 623, S. 64 degrees 40' E.
181.29 ft. (erroneously shown as
"193.73 ft." in previous deed), to
the beginning of a curve; thence
with a curve to the right, whose
radius is 25 ft., an arc distance
of 23.09 ft. to a point on the
westerly side of Route 11; thence
with Route 11, S. 11 degrees 58'
30" E. 87.56 ft to the place of
BEGINNING, and
BEING all of Lot 12-C according to
a survey made for Captain's Grove
Corporation showing a division of
Lot 12, Block 1, Captain's Grove,
which survey was made by T. P.
Parker, S.C.E., July 16, 1962
attached to and a part of the Deed
recorded in Deed Book 698, page 29,
at page 31 in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court for the County of
Roanoke, Virginia; and
BEING the same property conveyed to
Samuel Peters by deed recorded in
5 4 "7
February 23, 1988
548
February 23, 1988
lf- _..- - -------- - --- _ _ _ .. _ _ _ __ .. _ _- _ -„_
Deed Book 698, page 29, as
hereinabove set forth.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. The manufacturing activity on the property will
be those allowed under Section 21-24-1.A, Items 4, 6, and 10
2. No outside storage of any materials either raw o
finished.
3. Signage will be limited to surface mount on buil
and use of existing sign standard on property. Sign will be
more than 32 sq. ft. and will be unlighted.
4. TY~e-gantng-r~sll-re~rer~-te-B-2-aen4ag-sl~ettlel-tl~e
prepeseel-ttseel-be-termiaeteel- (Deleted in motion to approve)
288-5 Petition of JONES AND JONES
ARCHITECTS AND MEDICAL PROPERTIES
ASSOCIATES to vacate a portion of
a 25-foot right-of-way known as
Jones Street from Peters Creek Road
west approximately 170 feet in the
Catawba Magisterial District.
Mr. Gubala advised that no one present at the P1
Commission was opposed to this petition. One resident reque~
that consideration be given to closing the remainder of Jone
Street. A 20-foot easement will remain for water and sewer.
Jones was present to answer questions.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the petition.
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar
NAYS: None
ono
g
ted
Mr.
t
FINAL ORDER
549
February 23, 1988
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that that the 25 foot right
f way hereinabove described as Jones Street be permanently
acation and abandoned.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
Transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
s order be recorded by Petitioner along with the attache plat
ng the land records.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. The dedication of a 20 .foot easement for water and
ewer.
88-6 Petition of BARBARA D. CARTWRIGHT to vacate
portions of the cul-de-sac on Ponderosa
Circle in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District
Mr. Gubala advised that the Planning Commission reviewed
his request and recommended unanimous approval. Mr. Terry,
ttorney for the petitioner, was present.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the vacation. The
ion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the
ollowing recorded vote:
ES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
S: None
FINAL ORDER
550
February 23, 1988
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED That the turn around area
beyond the fifty foot right-of-way hereinabove described an as
shown in red (and cross hatched) on a plat attached hereto, be
permanently vacated and abandoned.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order b
transmitted to the Department of .Development and that this rder
be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat amon the
land records of Roanoke County.
288-7 Petition of UNG HYO CHOI to rezone a
.045 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-2
Business to operate a convenience store
located at 4533 Brambleton Avenue in the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Mr. Gubala advised that this property is located i
Transitional Land Use category. There are five proffered
conditions for use of the property. No citizens spoke in
opposition at the Planning Commission meeting and they
recommended approval 4 to 1.
The attorney for the petitioner was present to ans
questions.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petition wi
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS: None
a
er
~h
it
551
February 23, 1988
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
arcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
s Parcel 86.08-4-11 and recorded in Deed Book 1269, page 1430
nd legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business
istrict to B-2 Business District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a point at the
intersection of the west side of U>
S. Route 221 with the north side of
Virginia Secondary Route No. 906;
thence with the west side of Route
No. 221, N. 28 degrees 25' E. 220.1
feet to an iron; thence with a new
line through the J. L. Hoback
property, N. 61 degrees 05'W. 91.4
feet to an iron; thence with the
line of R. R. Thurman property, S.
29 degrees 03' W. 224.0 feet to an
iron on the north side of Route No.
906; thence with the north side of
Route No. 906, S. 63 degrees, 27'
E. 94.0 feet to the Beginning and
containing 0.47 acre, and being a
southerly portion of the J. L.
Hoback property and being as shown
on map made by T. P. Parker, C. E.,
dated January 24, 1958, a copy of
which is attached to that certain
deed dated February 14, 1958, of
record in the Clerk's office of the
Circuit Court for the County of
552
February 23, 1988
----- -- ------ -- -- ----___- ---- -- - -.. _ _ _---- --- ------ --_ _ - - -r
-- - - - -
~~ - _
Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book
596, page 111, conveying said
property from J. L. Hoback and wife
to R. G. Arthur; and
BEING the same property conveyed to
H• James Hagan and Bernice M.
Hagan, husband and wife, from
Charles Lee Payne, et al.
dated March 11, 1982 ~ by deed
in the aforesaid Clerk asdOfficedin
Deed Book 1181, page 1641.
'PROF- F-EROF CONDITIONS
1• Will not use temporary or portable signs.
2• .Will not use property for new or used car dealer,
undertaking establishment or funeral home; animal hospital,
clinic or commercial kennel; clinic, hospital, hospital spec
care or nursing home.
ip.
lal
3• Will maintain the hedge and brush at the rear of
property serving as a natural buffer with the adjoining
residential tract.
4• No billboard advertising will be permitted.
5• Will place two signs on property for the convenie ce
store; one on the face of the structure housing the store and the
other on the pole holding the signs of the existing businesses
288-8 Petition of HOBART COMPANIES LTD.
for a Use Not Provided For Permit
to construct a complex consisting
of office and retail space,
warehousing and light
manufacturing, located on the south
side of Peters Creek Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District.
February 23, 1988
Mr. Gubala reported there are a number of different uses
provided for in this complex. The site plan has been proffered.
'here was no citizen opposition to the proposal. There are six
proffered conditions. and the Planning Commission recommended
pproval 4 to 0. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, was
resent to answer any questions.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with
roffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
ickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
arcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
s Parcel 27.14-2-13 and recorded in Deed Book and legally
scribed below, be granted a Use Not Provided For Permit.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
~f Roanoke County.
A 4.974 acre of land, generally
located in the 6600 Block on the
South side of Peters Creek Road,
within the Catawba Magisterial
District, and recorded as a portion
5 5 `~
February 23, 1988
of. Parcel 27.14-2-12 and a portion
of Parcel 27.14-2-13, in the
Roanoke County Tax Records.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. Development will be in substantial conformity with
the site plan of Ernie-Rose, Inc., with a minimum of a 30 fo
buffer adjoining any residential property.
2. Uses to be limited to office, retail sales, serv
industry uses together with warehousing and light manufacture
as allowed in Section 21-24-1, M-1, Light Industrial Distric~
~t
ce
(A)
(1), (3}, (4), (5) and (6) of the Roanoke County Code.
3. Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 sq are
feet.
4. There shall be no outside storage of materials.
5. All lighting shall be directed away from the
adjoining residential property.
6. All building shall be constructed with brick on
front thereof.
288-9 Petition of DOMINION BANKSHARES CORPORATION
for a Special Exception Permit to operate an
office on an 8.461 acre tract in an M-1
Industrial zoning district, located at 5673
Airport Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
Mr. Gubala advised this petition did not go before t~
Planning Commission. The zoning ordinance has previously be
555
February 23, 1988
--
ded to allow for offices in M-1 Industrial districts with a
vial Exception Permit. This is a vacant building formerly
sed by Stone Printing. Dominion Bankshares plans to use the
ilding for a credit card operation.
Supervisor Johnson expressed concern that the building
as 2000 feet from a fire hydrant. Mr. Gubala responded this
be studied as part of the site plan review.
Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the Special Exception
ermit. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and
arried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AYS: None
88-10 Petition of AKFER DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION INC. AND KENNETH BOWLES to
vacate and relocate a 20 foot drainage
easements in Section 6 of Falling Creek
Estates.
Mr. Gubala advised that the purpose for the vacation is
cause there has been a house constructed on a lot that
zcroaches an existing easement. There will be a new drainage
isement that replaces the existing one. Jim Buchholtz, attorney
~r the petitioner, was present to answer any questions.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the vacation and
location. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
arried by the following recorded vote:
i
5y~~ ~',
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Ga
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
February 23, 1988
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, that the drainage
--- __ _ - ,
----
~t
easement, hereinabove described as crossing over, on and thr ugh
Lots, 2, 3, and 4, of Block 2, Section 6, Falling Creek Esta es
as shown on a plat be permanently vacation, abandoned and
relocated.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Department of Development and that this
be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among
land records of Roanoke County.
288-11 Public Hearing on the issuance of a WATER
SYSTEM REVENUE BOND of the County in a
principal amount not the exceed $975,000
to finance extensions of the County's
existing water system
Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advi
that this public hearing is a new state code requirement
beginning July 1987. The actual amount of bonds that the Co
r
Ithe
ed
my
is requesting from the Virginia Resources Authority is $960,(00
which includes the projects of Valleypointe, Appalachian Po
and the issuance cost of the bonds. The interest rate will
approximately 7.09. The bonds will be repaid with the revenue
55'7
--
February 23, 1988
rom the water system. Much of the money will be recovered from
off-site facility fees which will be collected from these two
elopments. After any citizen comment, staff is recommending
roval of the prepared resolution. No citizens were present to
ak on this public hearing.
County Administrator Elmer Hodge asked if the developer
f Valleypointe wanted to proceed with both Phase I and Phase II,
ill it be necessary to come back for approval of Phase II. Mr.
liss responded that this included both phases of this
oject.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the prepared
solution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and
rried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
S: None
TAIN: Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000
WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS
THEREOF
The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a political
vision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and
s received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virginia
°sources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of the
55:8
February 23, 1988
~~
County's existing water system. The County will issue its W ter
System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the on final
principal amount of $960,0.0,0, and sell the Local Bond to the Au-
thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loa .
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the fo low-
ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this me ting
and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreem nt,
dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between t e
Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local and
attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, ated
February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sup rvi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that:
1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, all ca ital-
ized terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings s t
forth in the Financing Agreement.
2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a reve ue
bond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Vi gin-
ia, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The
Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount f
$960,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price se
forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is he eby
determined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth o
Virginia and the County.
559
February 23, 1988; -
3. Authorization of Financings Agreement. The Finan-
ing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board
f. Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of
he County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub-
itted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis-
ions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be
videnced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof.
Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors
"Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County
strator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management
ervices ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of
ilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe-
to and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments,
nts or certificates, and to do and perform such things and
cts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out
he transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by
he Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the fore-
oing, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the Clerk,
he Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County
dministrator or the Director, are in all respects approved, rat-
fied and confirmed.
4. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
ssued as a fully registered bond without coupons in the denomina-
on of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local
`' V 0 February 23, 1988
Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and t e
principal amount thereof shall. be payable, subject to prior e-
demption, on November 1 in .each of the years and in the pay nt
amounts set forth below:
Principal Principal
Payment Payment
Amount Due Date
$20,000 November 1, 1988
25,000 November 1, 1989
25,000 November 1, 1990
25,000 November 1, 1991
30,000 November 1, 1992
30,000 November 1, 1993
35,000 November 1, 1994
35,000 November 1, 1995
35,000 November 1, 1996
40,000 November 1, 1997
40,000 November 1, 1998
45,000 November 1, 1999
45,000 November 1, 2000
50,000 November 1, 2001
55,000 November 1, 2002
60,000 November 1, 2003
65,000 November 1, 2004
65,000 November 1, 2005
70,000 November 1, 2006
80,000 November 1, 2007
85,000 November 1, 2008
Interest
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6.
6~
7~
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall
interest at its respective interest rate from the date of th
5~
0
2
4
6
8
~0
2
35
5
65
8
9
0
1
2
3
35
4
45
5
bear
Local Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In ~ddi-
tion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as providedllin
the Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or inter~st
is not received within five days of its due date.. Interest n
the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 3 0
February 23, 1988
561
s and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if
and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place
in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement.
Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to
.he payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the provi-
ions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged
o secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any,
interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the
y's obligations under the Financing Agreement.
The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on
he Local Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United
tates of America only from the Revenues and other sources
ledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and
Financing Agreement.
5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
ject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement.
6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default
11 have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount of
d accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared immediate-
due and payable by written notice to the County.
7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
gned by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and
Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a facsim-
Le of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be attested
562
February 23, 1988
by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case
officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shal
cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local B
such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient f
any
end,
~r all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office un it
such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such person as
at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the pr er
officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of de 'very
of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such offi rs.
8. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be s b-
stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financin
Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and i ser-
tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Fin n-
cing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond suc
legend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to
any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental aut]
rity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto.
9. Registration, Transfer and Fxrha
nae. The Count
hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent
keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bon
and to make such registration and transfers under such reason
regulations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Loca.
Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute andl
to
le
5f 3
February 23,.1988
~ -
11---- - -_-__ _ _- ~__
leliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local
pond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur-
~endered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest
.t the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each
ase to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe.
f presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the
ocal Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru-
ents of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub-
tance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by
he registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-
act or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis-
ered to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex-
hange shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the
ame debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this
esolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the
ecurity and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
urrendered.
10. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall
made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the
aunty may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a
~m sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that
~y be imposed in relation thereto.
564
__-- --- ------------- ---- - __ - _ II. _
initially issue the The Cot
Local Bond in t
Bond is issued in t YPewritten form. IP t
YPewritten form, .upon the written requ~
the registered owner of the Local Bond and
Local Bond in t upon surrender
YPewritten form, the County shall promptly
pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner
in printed form of the same maturit a Local
y and interest rate and
the same princi al amount as the t
P ypewritten Local Bond. ~
priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made
Local Bond to facilitate irl
printing.
12. Mutila}oa T__. _
If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destro~
the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond of like
date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon de]
ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local E
or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de
stroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall
cute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the r.
tered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and chart
of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a 1<
stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County E
Bence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen
destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis
tered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem
February 23,-.198$
GY may
~ Looal
t of
f the
:e-
~ond
O ~'
~ro-
1@
~•
e d,
Lv-
>nd,
xe-
gis-
~s
~t,
ri-
or
565
February 23, 1988
ity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead
f issuing a new Local Bond, the.County may pay the same without
render thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in-
ity.
13. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion
~f the information with respect to the County contained in the
section "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre-
ponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby
atified and confirmed and the use of such information in final
orm in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho-
ized and approved; provided, however, such information contained
n the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the
ssistant County Administrator before the distribution of the
eoffering Statement.
14. Filing of Resolution; Notice. The Chairman and
Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or
Iause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the
ircuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and
5.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and within
en days thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of general
irculation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brief and
eneral terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be
ssued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond.
566
February 23, 1988
15. Conflicting Resolutions. All parts of resolu
of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are
by rescinded and repealed.
16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take e~
immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supe
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
288-12 Public Hearing for citizen comment on
authorization of the Treasurer to issue
up to $8 MILLION REVENUE ANTICIPATION
N TES to cover operational cash
deficits
ions
ere-
fect
_sor
Mr. Chambliss advised that a public hearing must b
held before issuing any bonds or notes on behalf of the Coun y.
In 1987, the County had to borrow $10 million to cover casua
cash deficits experienced by the County because of the peak
seasons for collecting revenue. Most County revenue is rece ved
by December 5th and by June 5th for real estate and personal
property taxes and auto decal fees. It is anticipated that
will be necessary to borrow only $8 million even though the
advertisement stated $10 million. Staff recommends approval.
the proposed resolution after hearing any citizen comment.
i. t
egal
of
56.7
February 23,-1988
Mr. Hugh Key, 5355 Black Bear Lane, opposed this type
f borrowing, pointing out that this has only happened recently.
e asked why it is now necessary to borrow the money when it was
of done for so many years. He asked how much was being spent in
elation to each dollar of revenue increase.
Supervisor Johnson pointed out that in the past the
ounty could utilize interest on capital money that had not been
t to meet these problems. The federal law has changed, and
County can no longer use these funds.
Mr. J. F. Walker, 3313 Stonehenge Square, asked for a
~ationale of expenses for the $8 Million. He expressed concern
.t the expenses of moving public safety functions to Southview
chool. He advised that he had not receive a written response to
is previous questions concerning this move. Mr. Hodge advised
hat a written response had recently been sent to him and he
hould be receiving it shortly.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared
esolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
arried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
RESOLUTION 22388-6 AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION
NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $8,000,000
568
February 23, 1988
AND APPROVING THE FORM AND. DETAILS
THEREOF
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined t
is necessary and expedient to borrow $8,000,000 and to issu
revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $8,00
the
t it
its
000
(the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the Count~}~;
and
WHEREAS, the County desires to specify the form a
details of the Notes and authorize the County Administrator o
solicit bids from a limited number of potential investors f the
purchase of such Notes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Su rvi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of the County determines that it is dvis-
able to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an gre-
gate principal amount of $8,000,000. The issuance and sale f
the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of th
Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of th
County.
2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, witY~}~ut
privilege of registration. and without coupons, in substantia~~Lly
the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be -dated
March 14, 1988; shall be issued in denominations of $25,000;
569
February 23, 1988
hall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially; shall bear inter-
st at a rate to be set by a subsequent resolution of this Board
ayable at maturity; and shall mature on June 13, 1988. The
otes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before matu-
ity.
3. The full faith and credit of the County are pledged
o the payment at maturity of the principal of and interest on
he Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and appro-
riated for the timely payment of the Bonds, there shall be
evied, without limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in
ccordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable pro-
erty in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to pro-
ide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes at
aturity.
4. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the
unty are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes,
d the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the
al of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprint-
g of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided,
wever, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Trea-
rer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until
thenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In
se any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signa-
re shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer be-
5~0
February 23, 1988
fore the delivery of the. Notes,, such signature or such facs' ile
shall nevertheless be valid-and sufficient for all purposes he
same as if he or she had remained in office until such deli ry.
Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be sign by
such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the ro-
per officers to sign such Note although at the date of deli ry
of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. pon
receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or uch
agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Not to
the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agen of
the County are further authorized and directed to do all ac
required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, nc-
tual and complete performance of all things necessary for t 's
borrowing.
5. Crestar Bank is appointed as Paying Agent for
Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be ay-
able in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of he
Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust
office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia.
6. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that he
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be in sted
and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate the
County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and deli ry
of the Notes and that the County will comply with the coven is
571
. February 23, 1988
representations contained therein. Further, the County shall
ly with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the
nternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
7. The officers and advisors of the County are autho-
ized to solicit from a limited number of sophisticated investors
to purchase the Notes.
8. The officers and agents of the County are autho-
ized and directed to take such further action as may be neces-
or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and de-
ivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such offi-
', ¢~ers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and con-
firmed.
9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
f this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the
otes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant
o Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
s amended, and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the
ode of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to be published.
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
raw, and upon the following recorded vote:
ES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
5'~ 2
February 23, 1988
288-13 Public Hearing on the issuance of GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS not to exceed $3,985,000
to assist in financing renovations and
improvements to Back Creek Elementary
School and Bent Mountain Elementary
School
Superintendent of Schools Bayes Wilson reported
these bonds are for the additions to these two schools and
be borrowed from the Virginia Public School Authority. Bec
of the expected growth in this area of the County it will b
necessary to renovate both schools.
Supervisor Johnson asked when the Virginia Public
~t
11
School Authority issued bonds. Mr. Wilson responded there a.
spring and fall issue. Supervisor Johnson advised that the is
usual a decrease in the interest rate during a presidential ear.
He felt there might be a more favorable rate in the fall
asked what impact this would have on the progress of the
renovations. Mr. Wilson advised that if they waited until ~~11,
they would have at least one or two payments to the contrac rs,
and would have to ask for temporary borrowing to meet these
payments. Supervisor Johnson suggested using bond funds
earmarked for renovations to William Byrd Junior High Schoo and
paying it back from a fall bond issue when rates might be b ter.
Mr. Hodge advised that he did not think the bond referendum unds
could be used that way.
Donna Lane, President of the Back Creek PTA, spoke in suppo~{~ of
5 '7 3
February 23, 1988 -
proposed bond issuance. She felt that the work must begin
s summer and the County should not wait until the fall bond
ssue. She described the problems of the overcrowded conditions
t the school.
Mr. Chambliss advised that the Board could defer action
til the fall and make a loan from other funds. He did not feel
e money could come from the bond referendum funds without a
lidation process. Supervisor Robers expressed concern that the
unty would be taking a risk that the interest rates could be
gher in the fall.
Supervisor Johnson advised that the state had taken the
veiling off literary loan fund limits, and asked if the County
:ould utilize this source of revenue. Mr. Wilson responded that
se funds take 18 months and the County would have to wait
1 then to get the money. Mr. Wilson reported that they must
et the Virginia Public School Authority know by March 3rd if
intend to borrow the money.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared
solution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
sor Nickens asked if this item could be continued to a
cial meeting to allow the staff time to investigate other
ions for borrowing the money. The motion was defeated by the
ollowing recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors McGraw, Garrett
5 ~' 4
February 23, 1988
NAYS: Supervisors Robers, Nickens
PASS: Supervisor Johnson
Supervisor Nickens moved .that the staff study the
alternatives and that the Board continue this public hearin
Monday, February 29, at 8 a.m. for a decision. The motion
seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar
NAYS: None
to
s
t
Mr. Hodge told those citizens present that he woul let
them know what action takes place on February 29th.
IN RE; FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1.
and Ouail Place-
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading f
the ordinance. No one was present to speak on this ordinan
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried b the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar tt
NAYS: None
5 '~ 5
February 23, 1988
RE; SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke
A _ t~F.vcmrl~ inn ~nr T.'1 r7o rl ~. ~., .,7 n; .. ~l~.l ...i nn,........ .. 11 .. ....
ombinea net worth provisions: No one was present to speak to
his ordinance and a public hearing had been held earlier for
itizen comment.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The
tion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
llowing recorded vote:
ES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
YS: None
N RE; ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Garrett moved to adjourn the meeting to
ebruary 29, 1988 at 8 a.m. for the purpose of continuing Public
Baring 288-13. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens
nd carried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
S: None
5~ 6
February 23, 1988
- - -~ I.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
I
r
T~E~901? AN DUM
April 7, 1983
T0: John Williamson, Botetourt County
Byy~~b Herbert, City of Roanoke
~~lmer Hodge, Roanoke County
FROM: Kelly McDaniel ti~hitney-~~R.~~~ ~`!}
Rand~~ Smith, City of Salem
George Nester, Town of Vinton
RE: 1988-89 Litter Control Grants
Each of you should have received the 1988-89 grant information from Lynn ~iudson,
Commissioner of the Division of Litter Control and Recycling and Cynthia Bailey, Execu-
tive Director of the Department of Waste blanag~nent. As noted in these materials co-
operative programs such as Clean Valley Council can :Hake the grant application but need
a resolution from each participating local ~over~ent. (See enclosure).
As we need to have the grant application into DLC£~R no later than A~.ay 31, 1988, I
would appreciate receiving the resolution from each local government by May 16th. For
your use, I have also enclosed the outline of which points are to be addressed in the
resolution.
If you have any questions, please call me at the CVC office, 345-5523. Thank you
for your assistance.
~.~~n Roanoke Vallev. Virginia 24015-1320 Phone (703) 345-5523
CI¢an Vall¢y Council
i
y +~`
f.
~~ O f
~~ /4 :~
Iy~ ;_ V
cvr~rHiav aai~EV DEPARTMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
ExECU7~VE DiPECTOA
Di~~isio~~ o(Lrft~r Conh~ol .; Recycli~tg
121 ~ It'nslti~~,~>1o~z Bi~ildi~~,~r, Cn~itlol Sc~t~are
Rich»tortd, I'irgi~~in 23219
(~4O~) 7~S<-,4<i 9
I_~~nn Goorlwi~z Nudso~~, ~.OI)7I121.SS10I1P1
March 31 , 1988
t~1EMORANDUf41
TO: City, County, and Town Administrators
and Litter Control Grant Contacts ',/
FROM: Lynn G. Hudson, Commissioner ~/`~
SUBJECT: 1988-89 Litter Control Grants
~"Je are pleased to enclose a copy of our litter control grant regulations, the
1988-89 grant application, and updated funding schedules for your information
and review.
Please remember the following:
(1) Performance and Accounting Reports for FY 1987-88 will be sent to you at
the beginning of May, 1988. These reports must be completed and returned
or, or before July 20, 1988. We cannot fund your 1988-89 grant until we
receive ycur completed Performance Report.
(2) All grant applications must be completed and postmarked no later than May
31 , 1988. If you do not get your application in on time, we cannot assure
that your grant will be funded.
(3) The grant application must be accompanied by a line item budget, clearly
stating the intended use of the funds requested. ~'he application must also
be accompanied by a resolution adopted by the local governing body
approving the grant application. Please also remember that Article 7 in the
grant application must be signed by the appropriate local official. Grant
applications which do not have this documentation will not be processed.
Please remember to include the line item budget and the adopted resoluti:~n.
We look fcrward to working with you during the 1988-89 grant year. Please call
Mary Clark German at (804) 786-8679 if you have any questions regarding your
grant application.
LGH/jw
Enclosures
cc: Cynthia V. Bailey
Section 6. Application Procedures by Applicants
a. Single Locality Applicants. The Application must include the
following:
(1) Application Form LCG-1
(2) Line item budget
(3)~ Resolution by the governing body stating support and
request for the Grant (see attached sample resolution for
a single Locality applicant)
(4) Application Form LCG-1 shall be signed by the
County Administrator, City Manager, or other
official of the county, city, or town as may be
designated in the resolution.
b. Cooperative Program Applicants. Applications must include the
following:
(1) One Application Form LCG-1, which specifies a
single program applicable to all participating Localities
(2) One line item budget for the cooperative Program
(3) Separate and concurring resolutions from the governing
bodies of each of the participating Localities. Each
resolution must include all of the following points:
(Also, see attached "Sample Resolution for Cooperative
Programs")
(a) State the Locality's intent to enter into a mutual
program with other (named) Localities.
(b) Name and authorize one participating Locality,
Planning District Commission, or other organiza-
tion, (hereinafter referred to as the "Coordinator")
to apply for a Grant and to be responsible for the
administration, implementation, and completion of
the Program.
(c) Agree that all Grant funds received by the Locality
will be turned over immediately on receipt to the
Coordinator; or if coordinated by a Planning
District Commission, the Department will send all
funds directly to said Planning District Commission.
(d) Accept responsibility jointly with other Localities
and the Coordinator for all phases of the Program in
accordance with the Regulations and the Application.
-3-
2/88
~.
_.
__
x ~
_ ~,
~, _ ~s•-.
1 ~ _~ ~~°-
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MAY 10, 1988
Welcome to the Roanoke. County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 3:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call
2. Invocation: The Reverend David L. Wade
Bonsack United Methodist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
D. NEW BUSINESS
l.`"Approval of Letter of Understanding on Valleypoi(nt~,
~ _s .; ~ C~-mew-~
'`'" ' • 3 . Approval to ref use
c ~< ` ` ~~ collection.
<~.
<, `~ 4. Approval of Classification Plan for Fiscal Year
..- _
~c 1988/89.
~.__r
---~
Project. '~---
~,
2. Approval to allocate Roanoke Co~~u~n~~'s ~ A~- - - for
the VML/VACO Steering Committe ,~~negotiations with
Appalachian Power.
feu,
~ 5. Approval of Fiscal Year 1988/89 Budget
~- ~ ~, )
6. - __ Wellness Program for Roanoke County
employees.
~/ . Q,n-/~ e~'~ ~ (~_c._fu etc_
~. -~we~ ~--.
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
1.~---.--- Request for a Work Session on Roanoke River Tributaries
Study by Corps of Engineers.
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Budget Appropriation Ordinance.
-;
-r- ~~ . ~
~. ~ ~ ~ Z~
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
~'°'__
''( 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of
~.,~ the Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition
~ ~ of a new Article VIII imposing a tax on certain
,,~=~ food and beverages sold in the County of Roanoke,
--~~ pursuant to Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia
(1 ~0), as amended, and providing for the amount
of such tax, procedures for
collections, duties of local officials with
respect to such tax enforcement procedures, civil
penalties for late payment, misdemeanor penalties
/~ ~~°
2
for violations of article, exemptions, and an
effective date.
I. APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
~~~,-{ 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
3. Fifth Planning District Commission
4. Industrial Development Authority
5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Minutes of Meetings f February 9, 1988, February
23, 1988
2. ~- Request for acceptance of Fresh Meadow Lane and
Cloverleaf Circle into the VDOT Secondary System.
3.~__Request for acceptance of Haven's Trail into the
VDOT Secondary System.
>.
-.
~~ 4. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
~,._ ~,~
~ Fifth Planning District Commission, the Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission, and Total Action
~, Against Poverty Board of Directors.
~_
,`~.. 5. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
~`f
:. ~..`
~_.-
.-'a:.._
the
(,~,~~~~Q. Authorization to Execute a Regional Hazardous
~ ~1Materials response Agreement with the Va.
- ~ r-
~ Department of Emergency Services.
~~~ .
3
6. ~_Resolution of approval from the Planning
Commission~~proposed park development in
Hollins Project area.
J
`f`% 8. Approval of Minutes of Roanoke Valley Cooperation
Committee ~' C ~I ~ ~ l
.;:. /
~` ~~, 9. Authorization to enter into an agreement for
use and maintenance of private road.
%~ ,,~ 10. Acknowledge fro VDOT of the acceptance of 0.06
'-~ miles of Old Man Drive and 0.11 miles of Old
Manor Court into VDOT Secondary System. ;- , ~ ~,.~'
_._
M. REPORTS
1. ,_.-:General Operating Fund income analysis
2. ~.. Statement of Expenditures for month ended March
31, 1988.
,... ~.
f
N. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) to consider a real estate
matter.
P. ADJOURNMENT
4
rte`
1~
~;~
f"'Y
a
a _q
I
~ ~ c'4F LLB `b n rt
r;~s}$ `~ c
- ~.~.~ -V =.S Lb F~~+rFQc
# ~~ ~~
~£S `s'~ F IFS `tc 3b 9~Q `rr;
' ° 6~F r
j L~ Fbb`r;$L'F r1 X95 s~cF +:
F~ b3, ~ cr;~ ~S?s3 `F
(f.',E~~r t bFF'F$F ~f gc
rJ
tbcb `b, t * S8~ `~ ~c ~ A~j ~ F!c
S9
81, s
Fes" 1~~, O ,~, F{~,] ~~ ~ F ~~:
r~ ~ 8s}9`hI ~~ ~Qjt;rF 9~b',
~' ~L `~?L 916 ~9F
~Fr~'b~ ~ b~ r ~ y Fi F `iJ
L FO ~ '9;'$f F ".. 3~
f~ A ~A
Fcr+ Si,: ~f
LFO'r~~ F Fs, r~} jC1'1
~L `b , J8 sLs;c
~ fj=F c~JFj~F b~F Fsb~~~F ~`:9F
~b F `L 5; bbc 91 j F ~r `8
c bAF Fr,
~~`a SbF+~' Yg bFs`s,L.y +34+)'F,c
{~3 `A Ft t9 bF
{=~B°Ir * OFF`=L£`~ .~ g t ~bg°9F
i`rystF} ~ s~`04F`F L ~~Fc`iF +?FF`s3F,';
n p~,,y ~ f
Fpf `"' rJ (' ` U;Jjb L9 b'l j L~ (~T? ~Y. `ii
~ ~~ F ~ L~, j ;~~ j t cK 9` ~ ~b1 `Sbl}'b
~, c
~ ------------ -_ -~` LF~ ~F ~b`9bs~`b; ~
~3rA ~} ~3SHg t~~! ~? ~ -
- -i~~t4 ~ll~ 8S_I~_c I
__
88-186F ---- ~._,,,.- --
~~~'.~(`- f, _ ~-~~3~--~ ~:''. ___ ACTION #
~~ ~ -~~
c~_.,F' .~ --~ ,~„ __,` , r_ _<7~ ITEM NUMBER -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Premium Refuse Service
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROtttJn
Ci been raised over the fact that when
perform the refuse collectors will only take
the ho Further, in review of our current
procedt andicapped residents also receive
backdoc hold garbage only. The resolutions
defini~ 85-147 and Premium Service, 85-183
were p~ September 3, 1985 and October 22, 1985,
respect :ions established the procedures and
change; ~, established backyard "Collection for
Disable :he policy that residents who qualify
for th .. must make their own arrangements to
have ar not part of their regular household
refuse `or collection." This proposed redefi-
nition s to 351 residents who fall in these
two cai
SUMMAR
Item 1 ~mium Service:
P include trash that is not part of the
normal Phis would include grass, leaves, and
any of can be containerized and weigh 50 lbs.
or les ill be collected with the normal
househ ems that cannot be containerized
(white will continue to be collected at the
curb u nthly schedule.
Item 1.~, ____ _ d Premium Service:
Premium service presently costs the citizen $1.25 per
collection or $5.00 per month for those residents within 100 ft.
of the curb and an additional $4.00 charge for each additional
100 ft. or fraction thereof over the initial 100 ft. Cost of the
redefined service is increased by $.75 per collection for a total
of $8.00 per month and $5.00 per additional 100 ft.
Item 1.B - Redefined Premium Refuse Service Charge Per Month:
Distance From Curb
Current Rate
Charge Per Month
100 ft. or less $ 5.00 $ 8.00
101 - 200 ft. 9.00 13.00
201 - 300 ft. 13.00 18.00
301 - 400 ft. 19.00 23.00
401 - 500 ft. 21.00 28.00
501 - 600 ft. 25.00 33.00
601 - 700 ft. 29.00 38.00
701 - 800 ft. 33.00 43.00
801 - 900 ft. 37.00 48.00
901 - 1000 ft. 41.00 53.00
Item 2 - Redefinition of Backyard Service for Disabled Residents:
Disabled residents receiving backyard service will receive
the same redefined premium service without a fee.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Redefine premium service and increase the fee to cover the
service. This alternative will increase the level of
service and require more time to collect additional refuse.
2. Leave service and fee at present levels. This alternative
will limit backyard service to household refuse only, and it
would require premium and disabled service residents to make
their own arrangements to have any other materials placed at
the curb for collection.
The current services and fees are as follows:
Number of Customers Fee Service
40 $ 5.00 Premium
19 9.00 Premium
5 10.00 or more Premium
287 No Fee Elderly/Disabled
3. Redefine premium service with no increase in fees. This
alternative will increase service time and cost to the
county and require the department to absorb that cost.
IMPACT: Alternative #1 would increase the annual refuse revenues
by an estimated $3,750.00 to cover additional time required to
collect additional refuse.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve Alternative #1, and
that the county ordinance be amended to redefine premium service.
SUBMITTED BY:
a dner W. mi h
•_ Director
Department of General Services
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
VOTE
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
No Yes Abs
1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21 of the
Roanoke County Code Taxation by the addition of a new
Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and Beverages; such
new article VIII imposing a tax on certain food and
beverages sold in the County of Roanoke, pursuant to
Section 58.1-3833, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended,
and providing for the amount of such tax, procedures
for collection, duties of sellers and duties of local
officials with respect to such tax, enforcement
procedures, civil penalties for late payment,
misdemeanor penalties for violations of article,
exemptions, and an effective date.
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING
Mr . Hodge : ~~
You suggested that the Board recognize the art teachers and the
art shows hung in the Community Room at a board meeting.
/.,mod ~- ~~,~-~.~
May I suggest the following: ,
~ ~ ~ ~~-
l. I will contact the Su rvisor of Art for the County
Schools and ask her to invite th rt teachers who participate to
attend the Board meeting on F~Sruar 23rd.
2. We can recognize them by several ways:
1. A Resolution of Appreciation for their
participation in this project. ,
,~ ~~h ,
OR ~ ~~r/n 1"'
2. Present them with a ift - per a
Sesquicentennial Cup or maybe a sketch pad or a¢¢t__supplies?
Let me know what you think and I will coordiante with art
supervisor.
Mary Allen
1/28/88
7
-~
~~~t~
0
~Y
The tentative schedule for our program
L-ollows :
H M ~
• o ~
9:00 - 9:30 County Off K ~
Government n ~
n r-
9: 30 - 12:00 County Off } vim, ~,
Student Go• ~
department o ~
a
12:00 - 12:45 Lunch for C p' o
Student Gov ~
Roanoke Cou
~ rn
~
Center , Corr o ~
C K
(D
1:00 - 2:30 Student Gov ~
Supervisors rt o
2:30 Student Gov. ct o
ends, and o ~
to remain C ~'
Supervisors a• ~
N ~
N ct
~c a
'~s c-r
o cu
~-
~ a
ct ~
m K
m
ro m
~ ~
a m
~ ~
(D rt
d
0
H
O
to
0
w
w
wb
~ro
'c C
roa
o ~
~-
~~
m
r
ro c~
o ~
u. (D
(D fi
n
ct o
• r-n
C
0
a
cD
K
rr
w
~.
N•
w
0
0
~~
n4
x
z
H
O
ro
CoC
t~
N
o ~ ,~
~. ~
~c~
n tv rn
ct • rt
~ rt
~o
mw
n n
ro~
O rt
u.
cn a
0
~~
• ,A
0
H
~o
0
o `~
na
rt rr
~w
x~
00
~~
~w
N- rr
o ~•
~o
0
n
0
COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1988
JANUARY
Social Services Board (Welfare)
Four year term of William P. Broderick, Chairman, will
expire 1/1/88.
Transportation and Safety Commission
Three year terms of Leo Trenor, Hollins District,
Charlotte Lichtenstein, Windsor Hills District, and May
Johnson, C~.ve Spring District, will expire 1/1/88.
Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Four year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins
District will expire 1/22/88.
FEBRUARY
Grievance Panel
Two year term of Joe W. Himes will expire 2/23/88.
MARCH
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Two year terms of Gerald Curtiss, Catawba District,
Roger Smith, Catawba District, Marilyn Morehead,
Hollins District, Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton
District, Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District, will
expire 3/22/88.
One year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from
Cave Spring, will expire 3/22/88.
Two year term of judicial appointment Todd Turner will
expire 3/21/88.
League of Older Americans
One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative,
will expire 3/31/68.
APRIL
Building Code Board of Adjustments and-Appeals
Four year term of B. J. King, Windsor Hills District,
will expire 4/13/88.
Four year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton District,
will expire 4/27/88.
JUNE
Fifth Planning District Commission
Three year term of Lee B. Eddy, Citizen Representative,
will expire 6/30/88.
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District,
Yvonne Willis, Catawba District, James Bryant, Hollins
District, Paul D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District, and
Roger L. Falls, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/88.
Roanoke County School Board - Appointed by School Board
Selection Committee
Four year term of Paul Black, Hollins District, will
expire 6/30/88.
JULY
Social Services Board (Welfare)
Four year term of Betty Jo Anthony will expire 7/19/88.
Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waster Management Board
Four year terms of Howard R. Keister, Jr., County
Representative, and John H. Parrott, Chairman, City
Representative, will expire 7/31/88.
AUGUST
Community Corrections Resources Board
One year terms of Bernard Hairston, and Edmund J.
Kielty, Alternate, will expire 8/13/88.
CFUTF.MRF.R
Grievance Panel
Two year term of Thomas T. Palmer will expire 9/10/88.
Industrial Development Authority
2
Four year term of Tom Isenhart, Catawba District, will
expire 9/26/88.
OCTOBER
Grievance Panel
Three year term of Cecil Hill, Alternate, will expire
10/12/88.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community
Services Board
Two year term of Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large,
will expire 10/31/88.
NOVEMBER
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
One year terms of Cassidee R. Nickens, youth member
from William Byrd, and Molly Eller, youth member from
Glenvar High, will expire 11/13/88.
DECEMBER
Library Board
Four year term of Carolyn Pence, Vinton District, will
expire 12/31/88.
Mental Health SErvices of the Roanoke Valley, Community
Services Board
Three year term of Barbara Higgins, County appointee,
will expire 12/31/88.
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Four year term of Michael J. Gordon, Windsor Hills
District, will expire 12/31/88.
3
~~c~-~- -
-n~- -
G? ~ ~
/,L~,e~
~ ~,
~ / ~
~ ~
_----
'~
_,
~ ~ ~~G
3 ,.
n
~~
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: John R. Hubbard
FROM: Paul M. Mahoney
DATE: March 1, 1988
RE: Maintenance of private road
Maynard Heslep
ft7C`~'~. }'f ~
~~`~., r. ~ ,.V,.,,
t
, ~ c ~ ,y
~: 63 "j;r,~ _
A~VpkF v'~f? ~. ~~
r
~r~ AFp~T~FS ~' ~~
~~, .T ~.4
l ~1~ %,
On February 25, 1988, Mary dicks directed an inquiry to Phil
Henry concerning the above-referenced matter. Mr. Henry referred this
inquiry to you, and you, in turn, forwarded that inquiry to me. Speci-
fically you stated that you thought I had "worked on an agreement with
Mr. Heslep" and that you needed some information concerning this pos-
sible agreement. .
I had an opportunity to discuss this matter last year (1987)
with Mr. Heslep as a part of the Fairway Forest/Bill Reid issue. On
July 24, 1987, Mr. Heslep presented to me his demands for a resolution
of this problem.
1. An agreement that would address the past 11 years; that
would address the maintenance and upkeep of this private road. The
amount demanded was $400 per year.
2. A maintenance agreement for the future if there is no accep-
tance of this private road into the state secondary system.
3. That the road be located at least 30 feet from his house;
that any proposed road be routed along the back side of the remainder
of the southern portion of his property (near a dry weather creek);
that the remainder of his southern property be "buildable"; and that
the new road be sloped into the remainder of his property so that he
have access for future building sites.
4. 'That a 10-year freeze on any increase in real estate assess-
ments be granted him or that the present value of his property not
increase.
5. Zhat he 'oe guaranteed certain conditions regarding construc-
tion traffic as well as control of any dust and any damage to his
bridge.
I believe that you and I then discussed these demands and deter-
mined that they were outrageous. Therefore, we decided not to proceed
with a resolution of this problem along these lines. At that same
time, the Fairway Forest issue apparently was resolved and the addi-
tional road access through Mr. Heslep's property as demanded by some
of the residents in Fairway Forest was deemed to be unfeasible.
Approximately one month, later Mr. Heslep contacted me concerning the
..
e status of this matter and I advised him that it appeared that a state
~_ secondary road would not be constructed across his property.
I do not recall any further discussions regarding this matter
with Mr. Heslep, nor do I recall any substantive agreement or meeting
of minds occurring to resolve his complaint. If I can provide any
further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
PMM/s5
k
r _
.. ' _: ~ ' ~ n ~ m
~ ~ i .r ~ y
... ~ ~ In ,,~ ?F ~.~ ;n .}. 1: < ~ ...~ ~ rt CO i G1
,~- N , r 00 0 ~ O O 'O m
. 0~ a
_ c ~ ~ i ?~' _ p 'n, ~
°~ to sn :~ _ ;~ 1~~ i ,,z. ~ ~ T ~ .~
i 0 .~ 1
., N ~ _ O .~ '~,. a i ~f0 to t- S
7 ~ ~ ~ ~ d - ~ O' - a ' ~ ~ ~ j V tL2
.~ ~
-Z ~ ~ rt + o t7 (D to
rr D- ~ -s x N ~. p O ; K
to i1 S (D i u : N p- ~trJ ~ C Ui
rt U ~ O _ ^ i ~ , n rt pl R C
p (D L ~ N vOi '~ ~' _ T
N n:
a _. -t - _ 1 rt S p~ r O
~ N C ~ rr O O `G , d ~ O-
~ ~ ~ m S ~ i3 3 ~ n to
i p~ ,G O ~ ~ • ~ to , In
G !-h Z ~
_ -• i~
d tD rt d
i ~ ~ 7 i 3 _ (D C 'Q _ ~ N ~ rt
> rt. rr ~~ ~~ O ~ ~O O 'O' ~
a 'S
s a. O (D p T rt ~ ~ F '~ ~ c
_ ~ a O (D _. i ~ (D ~~ N = O (D ~
~'
p ^i N O ' ~ ' r rf to (D ~ N ~` ' : r1 '', O
Cl
o ~ ~ ~ N !A rt. '~ iN N r ;S ly
d
o ~ t It9 "S ~
C . ,- .. ~ .. - -
i
_ n ~ ~ ~7~ .. ~fi ~ 1. t~ ? :ice ,Vl {
t ^'G
'~ `~ fD fD
d
~ ,y ~ ~ O ~ ~.f O O N
d O O N
(D ~' `p
o ,
-~ to ; !nl fD ;C err
0
i ~s.. 5 ~~ ~ "~ _ < to ~ i' fi ~ „:.i~'~` .:~
~.,r..~,.,s~„,.., ~ .. .~~. ,...
~~lx. fY ~ w. Mw . . ~ ...~ v n _ .
a
~
- t
f
t
i
3
~ _
; ,.
~ i
~ ,r;;w;
tY
fD ~
4 ~ `+
~ ~ ~.
7
7
N
}
~ i~
~ -{
•
t ~
1 t Z
~ i ~
~
'S i~
S~
~
a
rt ! i
fD ~ ~
~
-, 4
, i
a ~ ~.
1
}
j i
O
~
'
.. .
O.
.. ~ ~... C ..:.
OO,.~
- m o.o
N
'
X
C
Dw~~
N
V2 Qp
~
~ o Z
~. ~
:m
~u~,~fK~
`~,,,,p,,v~ a< ~.~
~ z~ ~JF„Gi' ~ Air--'~i~~
~G, ~ ~ ~,~ ~~ ~,~2.~
OF POANO,y.F
a P ~
~. .p
Z
~ 2
°v a~
~,.
1$ 150 $8
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
January 6, 1988
Rev. David L. Wade
Bonsack United Methodist Church
4661 Bonsack Road, NE
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Dear Reverend Wade:
BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING IAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Sys- s4~5
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank
you for giving the invocation at the Board of Supervisors'
meeting in the past.
We would again like to call on you to present the invocation
on Tuesday, May 10, 1988, at 3:00 p.m. If you are unable to do
this, please call me at 772-2005. Someone from this office will
be calling you soon to see if this time is acceptable to you, or
if you would prefer another date.
The Board members are aware of how busy your schedule is,
and they appreciate your volunteering the time to offer God's
blessing at their meetings.
Sincerely,
~.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
/~s
C~n~tn~~ of ~nttnv~~~e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
~~~>
f
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
~~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
,~ ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, ~~~ 1988.
c~~yyy
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND
PROTECTION," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2,
~ "POSSESSION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS," THE REPEAL OF
ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE
PROTECTION CODE,"; AND BY THE ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II,
"VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES, AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF SAME.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
•-~ 1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code, "Possession,
sale, dis~arge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby deleted and
repealed in its entirety.
2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the
Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its
entirety.
3. That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter
9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in
its entirety.
4. That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is
hereby amended and re-enacted as follows:
Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of
Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke
County shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code
as written with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Code
was adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community
Development and said Board promulgated certain regulations and
procedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this
Code. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is
incorporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length
herein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the
Fire Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be
referred to as such or as this Code.
Section 2. The purposes of this Code are to provide
for statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard life
and property from the hazards of fire or explosion arising from
the improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention and
protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and the
unsafe storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, and
devices wherever located.
Section 3. The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby
directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall
establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for
the administration and enforcement of said Code. The County Fire
Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation
of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of
Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordinate
his enforcement activities with the County Building Official and
Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and detail
such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as
inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in
administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code.
2
Section 4. There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five
Dollar ( $25 ) fee for all ermit~s`~i~s~ sued pursuant to the ~ ~'
6.x,,,4, ,a,~+t~'tw:4 ~ti1,c QJIJt.Ft.~1~- ~ • ~/w!y
~~ permit issued shall be by the Office of the Fire Marshal.
Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall not
be applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton.
Section 6. That the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section
27-97 of the Code of Virginia in the following respects:
1. F-102.1 Enforcement officer. Add ~...
the following at the end of the
existing subsection F-102.1:
The provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code shall be enforced by
the Office of the Fire Marshal, also herein referred
to as the Fire Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal,
members of the Fire Marshal's staff, the Fire
Prevention Division, or the Fire Official.
2. F-102.1.1 Inspection by others. Add
subsection F-102.1.1 as follows:
The Chief of the Fire Department may designate such
other persons as he deems necessary to make fire
safety inspections. Such persons shall use the
Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this
Code as the basis for such inspections.
3. F-102.1.2 Impersonation. Add subsection
F-102.1.2 as follows:
3
It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized person to
use a badge, uniform or any other credentials so as
to gain access to any building, marine vessel,
vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise falsely
identify himself as the fire official or his
designated representative.
4. F-103.4 Investigation of fires. Add
subsection F-103.4 as follows:
The Fire Marshal shall investigate or cause to be
investigated, every fire or explosion occurring
G
within the County that is of a suspiious nature or
which involves the loss of life or causes injury to
persons or causes destruction of or damage to
property. Such investigation shall be made at the
time of the fire or at a subsequent time, depending
on the nature and circumstances of the fire. The
Fire Marshal shall take charge immediately of the
physical evidence and, in order to preserve any
physical evidence relating to the cause or origin of
such fire or explosion, take means to prevent access
by any person or persons to such building,
structure, or premises until such evidence has been
Qr ~erly processed.
5. F-103.4.1 Summonsing the Fire Marshal. Add
subsection F-103.4.1 as follows:
The fire department officer-in-charge of any~fire,
explosion or incident scene shall immediately
4
summons the Fire Marshal to such scene to
investigate the circumstances involved where such
circumstances require investigation as outlined in
F-103.4 of thie Code.
6. F-103.5 Modifications. Add the subsection
F-103.5 as follows:
The fire official shall have the power to modifv an
provision or requirement of this Code, upon written
application by the owner, lessee, occupant or their
legal representative, when there is practical
difficulty in meeting the strict letter of the Code.
However, in all cases of modification, the spirit
and intent of the Code shall be met to ensure the
health, safety and welfare of persons is protected.
7. F-103.6 Notification of fire department. Add
subsection F-103.6 as follows:
In any building subject to inspection under.~'Q~
provision of this Code, when a fire or evidence of
there having been a fire discovered, even though it
has apparently been extinguished, it shall be
immediately reported to the Chief of the fire
department, or his designee. This shall be the duty
of the owner, manager, or person in control of such
building at the time of discovery. This requirement
shall not be construed to forbid the owner, manager,
or person in control of said building from using all
5
diligence necessary to extinguish such fire prior
to the arrival of the fire department.
8. F-201.0 Applied Meaning of Words and Terms:
Add to section F-201.0 the following words, terms
and meanings:
Fire Lanes:
An area designated by clearly visible
signs in which parking shall be prohibited, whether
on public or private property, to ensure ready
access for and to fire fighting and rescue equipment
and facilities.
9. F-303.0 Torches for the Removal of Paint.
Add the following words to the title:
or Sweating Pipe Joints.
10. F-303.3 Sweating Joints. Add the following
subsection F-303.3:
Any person using a torch o~other flame producing
device for sweating pipe joints in any building or
structure shall have available in the immediate
vicinity where the sweatina is done one (1) approved
fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a water
supply. Combustible material in close proximity to
the work shall be protected against ignition by
shielding, wetting or other approved means. In all
cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of
the sweating operation for one-half (1/2) hour after
the torch or flame producing device has been used.
6
11. F-303.3.1 Permit Required. Add subsection
F-303.3.1 as follows:
A permit shall be obtained from the fire official
prior to using a torch or other flame producin
device for sweating pipe joints in any building or
structure.
12. F-313.1 Designation. Delete and
substitute as follows:
-~ ~i~e eeele ef~~e~a~ sl~a~~ ~ee~e~~~e anel des~e~~ate p~b~~e
e~ pr~~rate f~~e banes as deeatee~ aeeessa~p fey ~l~e
eff#e~ea~ ar~el e~€ee~~~e t~se e~ ~~~e appa~a~t~s- F~~e
banes sl~a~~ l~a~e a ~~n~x~t~~ w~dtl~ e€ ~8 €ee6 15486
~~_
The fire official shall designate fire lanes on
public streets and on private ro erty where
necessary for the purpose of preventin arkin in
front of or adjacent to fire hydrants and fire
department connections and to ensure access to
buildings and structures for fire fightin and
rescue apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum
width of 18 feet ( 5486 mm) .
13. F-313.4 Signs and Markings. Add section
F-313.4 as follows:
The property owner or designee shall supply and
install signs and other required markin s to
delineate fire lanes as directed by the fire
7
14. F-313.5
as follows:
Specifications. Add section F-313.5
Fire lanes shall conform to the following
specifications:
(A) The design of such signs shall conform to the
~' state manual on uniform traffic-control devices
and shall include the language "No Parking-Fire
Lane."
(B) Signs designating fire lanes shall be located
so as to provide at least one sign for every
one hundred (100) feet of fire lane space.
Should the fire marshal determine that
additional signs are necessary, the owner or
agent of the property shall provide the same.
All such signs shall be maintained in proper
position and sufficiently legible to be seen by
an ordinarily observant person.
(C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows:
(1) Pave edge to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than
10'.
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(2) Curb face to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(3) Pavement top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7'
(4) Curb top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7'
(D) Posts for fire lane signs, where required,
shall be metal and securely mounted.
(E) The curb or pavement edge of all fire lanes
shall be painted yellow. Any existing marking
in the area designated as a fire lane shall be
obliterated or painted over in a manner
approved by the fire marshal.
15. F-313.6 Where fire lanes are designated at
fire hydrant locations.
The following shall apply where fire lanes are
established at fire hydrant locations:
(1) Where hydrants are located at or close to the
curb line or edge of the road and face on a
public street, a public parking lot or a
private road open to the public, parking within
fifteen (15) feet is prohibited.
(2) A special curb marking designated areas
established pursuant to (1) above, shall be
required and shall be yellow.
8
(3) No ..planting, erection or other obstruction
shall be allowed within four (4) feet of the
fire hydrant.
(4) All hydrants shall be painted in accordance
with standards established by the Fire Marshal.
5. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective
from and after June 1, 1988.
9
~ ~~~
~'
j
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY MAY 24, 1988
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION
AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY
REPEALING SECTION 9-2, "POSSESSION, SALE,
DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS," THE REPEAL OF
ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND TAE REPEAL OF
ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE,"; AND BY
THE ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA
STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND
INSPECTION FEES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCE-
MENT OF SAME.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code, "Posses-
sion, sale, discharge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby,~repealed in
its entirety.
2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the
Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its en-
tirety.
3. .That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter 9
of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its
entirety.
4. That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Preven-
tion Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby
amended and re-enacted as follows:
Section 1. That pursuant to the provision of Section 27-
98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke County shall
enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as written
with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Code was adopted
by the State Board of Housing and Community Development and said
Board promulgated certain regulations and procedures to accomplish
the adoption and enforcement of this Code. The Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code is incorporated herein by reference as fully
as if set out at length herein. The regulations set forth herein
shall be known as the Fire Prevention Code of the County of
Roanoke and shall be referred to as such or as this Code.
Section 2. The purposes of this Code are to provide for
statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard life and
property from the hazards of fire or explosion arising from the
improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention and
protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and the
unsaf a storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, and
devices wherever located.
Section 3. The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby
directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall
establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for
the administration and enforcement of said Code. The County Fire
Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation
of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of
Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordinate
his enforcement activities with the County Building Official and
Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and detail
such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as
inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in
administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code.
Section 4. There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five Dollar
($25) fee for all permits issued pursuant to the provisions of the
Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Any permit issued shall
be by the Office of the Fire Marshal.
Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be
applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton.
Section 6. That the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention
Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section 27-97 of
the Code of Virginia in the following respects:
1. F-102.1 Enforcement officer. Add the follo~nag at
the end of the existing subsection F-102. .• The p .-
visions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code
and this Code shall be enforced by the Office of the
Fire Marshal, also herein referred to as the Fire
Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal, members of the Fire
Marshal's staff, the Fire Prevention Division, or the
Fire Official.
2. F-102.1.1 Inspection by others. ~ Add subsection F-
102.1.1 as follows: The Chief of the Fire Department
may designate such other persons as he deems necessary
to make fire safety inspections. Such persons shall use
the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this
Code as the basis for such inspections.
3. F-102.1.2 Impersonation. Add sub section F-102.1.2 as
follows: It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized
person to use a badge, uniform or any other credentials
so as to gain access to any building, marine vessel,
vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise falsely identify
~d3,.y".1
himself as the fire official or his designated represen-
tative.
4. F-103.4 Investigation of fires. Add subsection F-
103.4 as follows: The Fire Marshal shall investigate or
cause to be investigated, every fire or explosion
occurring within the County that is of a suspicious
nature or which involves the loss of life or causes
injury to persons or causes destruction of or damage to
property. Such investigation shall be made at the time
of the fire or at a subsequent time, depending on the
nature and circumstances of the fire. The Fire Marshal
shall take charge immediately of the physical evidence
and, in order to preserve any physical evidence relating
to the cause or origin of such fire or explosion, take
means to prevent access by any person or persons to such
building, structure, or premises until such evidence has
been properly processed.
5. ., Summonsing the Fire Marshal. Add subsection
F-103.4.E as follows: The fire department officer-in-
charge of any fire, explosion or incident scene shall
immediately summons the Fire Marshal to such scene to
investigate the circumstances involved where such
circumstances require investigation as outlined in F-
103.4 of this Code.
6. F-103.5 Modifications. Add the subsection F-103.5 as
follows: The fire .official shall have the power to
modify anYProvision or requirement of this Code, u on
written application by the owner, lessee, occupant or
their legal representative, when there is practical
difficulty in meeting the strict letter of the Code.
However, in all cases of modification, the spirit and
intent of the Code shall be met to ensure the health,
. ----
safety and welfare of persons is protected.
7. F-103.6 Notification of fire department. A d d s u b-
section F-103.6 as follows: In any building subject to
inspection under any provision of this Code, when a fire
or evidence of there having been afire discovered, even
~~~rr~r~r~rsa.sr~ ~. iwr~ i.r..~. r ~.
though it has apparently been extinguished, it shall be
immediately reported to the Chief o epart-
ment, or his designee. This shall be the duty of the
owner, manager, or person in control of such building at
the time of discovery. This requirement shall not be
construed to forbid the owner, manager, or person in
control of said building from using all diligence
necessary to extinguish such fire prior to the arrival
of the fire department.
8. F-1 ~ Conditions of er Insert the following
words on the n after the words "Permits are not
transferabl ". "from o ddress to another."
S /9. F-201.0 Applied Meaning of Words and Terms: Add to
section F-201.0 the following words, terms and meanings:
Fire Lanes: An area designated by clearly visible signs
in which parking shall be prohibited, whether on public
or private property, to ensure ready access for and to
fire fighting and rescue equipment and facilities.
~~ F-303.0 Torches for the Removal of Paint. A d d t h e
following words to the title: or Sweating Pipe Joints.
_ ~o ~. F-303.3 Sweating Joints. Add the following subsec-
tion F-303.3: Any person using
,.. - a torch or other flame
producing device for sweating pipe joints in any
building or structure shall have available in the
immediate vicinity where the sweating is done one (1)
approved fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a
water supply. Combustible material in close proximity
to the work shall be protected against ignition by
M~.M11. 4fM~YYYI~Ii~p,
shielding, wetting or other approved means. In all
a ~ n.~~i
cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of the
sweating operation for one-half (1/2) hour after the
torch or flame producing device has been used.
// .+s• F-303.3.1 Permit Required. Add subsection F-303.3.1 as
follows: A permit shall be obtained from the fire
official prior to using a torch or other flame producing
device for sweating pipe ioints in any building or
structure.
'~ ,]~. F-313.0 a Lan Add, substitute, or amend
section F-313 as ollows:
She , l~
~. F-313.1 Designation. elete and substitute as
t
5~
x
e~e follows: The fire official shall designate fire lanes
on public streets and on private~roperty where neces-
sary for the purpose of preventing parking in front of
..~. •--
GENERAL PRECAUTIONS AGAINST FIRE
~~
F-312.6 Ash trays: Where smoking is permitted, there shall be provided on
each table and at other convenient locations suitable noncombustible ash
trays or match receivers.
".. ~, SECTION F-313.0 FIRE LANES
~~~ ~~ ~~ F-313.1 Designation: The code official shall require and desi Hate
S' private fire lanes as deemed necessary for the efficient and effegtive use olf fie
y~Q~ ~ke+~ ~ apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum width of 18 feet (5486 mm .
~j F-313.2 Obstructions: Designated fire lanes shall be maintained free of
x~-~.~ ~ i;,~ obstructions and vehicles and marked in an approved manner.
,~Q 313.3 Maintenance: All designated fire lane signs or markings shall be main-
~p tained in a clean and legible condition at all times and replaced when necessary
to insure adequate visibility.
,'=` ~'=.
SECTION F-314.0 ELECTRICAL
F-314.1 Abatement of electrical hazards: When any electrical hazards are
identified, such conditions shall be abated. All identified hazardous electrical
conditions in permanent wiring shall be brought to the attention of the
electrical code official.
F-314.2 Illumination: Illumination shall be provided for all service eq uipment
areas, motor control centers and electrical panelboards.
F-314.3 Clearance: Clearance of not less than 30 inches (762 mm) shall be
provided between all electrical service equipment and storage.
F-314.4 Multi-plug adaptors: The use of multi-plug adaptors, such as cube
adaptors, unfused plug strips, or any other device that does not comply with
NFIPA 70 listed in Appendix A shall be prohibited.
F-314.5 Extension cords: Extension cords (flexible cords) shall not be used as
a substitute for permanent wiring. Extension cords and flexible cords shall not
be affixed to structures, extended through walls, ceilings, floors, under doors,
or floor coverings, nor be subject to environmental damage or physical
impact.
F-314.6 Unapproved conditions: Open junction boxes and open wiring splices
shall be prohibited. Approved covers shall be provided for all switch and
electrical outlet boxes.
F-314.7 Nonapproved appliances: Electrical appliances or fixtures shall not
be made available for use or used unless they are listed by an approved agency.
F-314.8 Electrical motors: All electrical motors shall be maintained free from
excessive accumulations of oil, dirt, waste, and debris.
SECTION F-315.0 ASPHALT ~TAR~ KETTLES
F-315.1 General: Any asphalt (tar) kettle beneath which is maintained any
open fire, heated coals or ashes shall not be transported or permitted to be
transported over any highway, road or street.
25
or adjacent to fire hydrants and fire department
connections and to ensure access to buildings and
structures for fire fighting and rescue apparatus. Fire
lanes shall haves a minimum width of 18 feet (5486mm).
F-313.4 Signs and Markings. Add s ection F-313.4 as
13.
f ollows: The property owner or designee shall supply
and install signs and other required markincts to
delineate fire lanes as directed by the fire official.
~~ .,1'f. F-313.5 Specifications. Add section F-313.5 as
follows: Fire lanes shall conform to the following
specifications:
~f~~wlC (A) The design of such signs shall conform to the state
~ manual on uniform traffic-control devices and shall
~~ ~~ ~ ~
~~~5 include the language No Parking-Fire Lane..
(B) Signs designating fire lanes shall be located so as
to provide at least one sign for every one hundred
(100) feet of fire lane space. Should the fire
marshal determine that additional signs are
necessary, the owner or agent of the property shall
provide the same. All such signs shall be main-
tained in proper position and sufficiently legible
to be seen by an ordinarily observant person.
(C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows:
(1) Pave edge to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than 10'.
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(2) Curb face to sign edge:
Rural: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'.
(3) Pavement top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7' _
(4) Curb top to sign bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7'
(D) Posts for fire lane signs, where required, shall be
metal and securely mounted.
(E). The curb or pavement edge of all fire lanes shall
be painted yellow. Any existing marking in the
area designated as a fire lane shall be obliterated
or painted over in a manner approved by the fire
marshal.
1J ,,~. F-313.6 Where fire lanes are designated at fire
hydrant locations.
',~Q The following Fi' _y shall apply where fire lanes are
1A~'~¢S established at fire hydrant locations:
~,' (1) Where hydrants are located at or close to the curb
line or edge of the road and face on a public
street, a public parking lot or a private road open
to the public, parking within fifteen (15) feet is
prohibited.
(2) A special curb marking designated areas established
pursuant to (1) above, shall be required and shall
be yellow.
f
s
1
a
}
(3) No planting, erection or other obstruction shall be
allowed within four (4) feet of the fire hydrant.
(4) All hydrants shall be painted in accordance with
standards established by the Fire Marshal.
5. The provisions of this ordinance shall'-be effective from
and after June ~, 1988.
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~ - ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 10, 1988
AGENDA ITEM:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Request for Work Session on Roanoke River
Tributary Streams Study by Corps of Engineers
,~' ~-~ ~~
',~~~'"r
~~
BACKGROUND:
~..
The Corps of Engineers was unable to attend the Work Session
scheduled for April 26, 1988. At that Board Meeting, 'the Work
Session was t tatively rescheduled for 2:00 p.m., May 24, 1988.
The staff vas t~ contact the Corps to see if this date is suit-
able for them. ~-j'
SUMM~,RY OF INFORMATION:
'` The Corps has agreed to appear at the Work Session resched-
uled for 2:00 p.m., May 24, 1988.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that a Work Session on the Roanoke River
tributary streams study by the Corps of Engineers be placed on
the agenda for 2:00 p.m., May 24, 1988.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
~. ~ J
ohn R. Hubbard, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant County Administrator County Administrator
Community Services & Development
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers