Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/24/1988 - Regular0~ ROANp~,~ ~ ~ ti ~ . a2 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ 150 18 re.ns 88 SFSQUrcENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Beauti~ulBeginning ACTION AGENDA' MAY 24, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. EXECUTIVE SESSION (2:00 P.M.) PURSUANT TO THE CODE OF VIRGINIA 2 1-344 (A) (2) TO DISCUSS A REAL ESTATE MATTER LG/BLJ AT 2:03PM - UVV AFTERNOON SESSION (3:00 P.M.) A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Branan G. Thompson Colonial Avenue Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. ECH REQUESTED TO MOVE WORK SESSION TO FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATIONS BLJ REQUESTED ADDITION OF ITEM I-5, APPROVAL OF RAFFLE PERMIT FOR COMMUNITY SCHOOL LG ADDED ITEM C-5, RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ROBERT BROWN C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. A Resolution of Congratulations to the Roanoke Valley Squires for winning the State AAU Basketball Championship (WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE EVENING SESSION AT 7 P.M.) 2. Acknowledgment of Certificate of Excellence from the American Society for Public Administration 3. Proclamation recognizing the Law Enforcement Torch Run for the Virginia Special Olympics and participation by the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department. RR/HCN - UVV 4. Resolution of Congratulations to Mountain View Elementary School for National Recognition as an outstanding school. BLJ/HCN - UVV R-52488-1 5. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Robert Merle Brown. R-52488-2 RR/BLJ - UW WORK SESSION 1. Flood Control for Roanoke River Tributaries WORK SESSION SET FOR 6/28/88 TO DISCUSS SOLUTIONS FOR RELIEF FOR CITIZENS AFFECTED BY TRIBUTARY FLOODING BLJ REQUESTED COMMUNITY MEETING WITH CITIZENS FOLLOWING WORK SESSION D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Adoption of the budget for fiscal year 1988/89. A-52488-3 BLJ/RR TO APPROVE - URC 2. Credit and Reimbursement for water and sewer construction to Trent's Trace. A-52488-4 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE ALTERNATE #1 AS AMENDED WITH #1B AUTHORIZING A 10 YEAR REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT - URC 3. Credit for water construction to Windemere Subdivision. A-52488-5 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE ALT. #1 - URC 4. Authorization to approve contracts with Airport Commission and Roanoke City - Valleypointe Project A-52488-6 LG/BLJ TO APPROVE ABSTAIN - SAM 2 AYES; BLJ,RR,HCN,LG 5. Approval of Vehicle Utilization Policy A-52488-7 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE ALT. #1 AMENDED TO INCLUDE: ONLY 356 VEHICLES WILL REMAIN IN FLEET AS OF JULY 1, 1988 URC E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION ON SOLUTIONS FOR CITIZENS ON FLOOD AND DRAINAGE FROM ROANOKE RIVER TRIBUTARIES - JUNE 28, 1988 WORK SESSION ON POSSIBILITY OF REFERENDUM VOTE ON ELECTION OF SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS - JUNE 14, 1988 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 3. Fifth Planning District Commission 4. Industrial Development Authority 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Planning Commission NONE H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS JOHNSON: (1) MOVED THAT A LETTER OF CONCERN BE SENT TO BOTETOURT COUNTY CONCERNING PROPOSED LANDING STRIP WHICH COULD AFFECT BONSACK COMMUNITY - UW. (2) CONCERNED ABOUT PROLIFERATION OF LARGE SIGNS. ASKED STAFF TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBILITY OF SPEEDING UP NEW SIGN ORDINANCE AND ENSURING THAT THESE LARGE SIGNS ARE NOT "GRANDFATHERED" INTO THE SIGN ORDINANCE. ALSO ENSURE THAT THESE SIGNS ARE TAXED WHETHER OWNERS ARE IN COUNTY OR NOT. ROBERS: (1) HAS MADE CONTACT WITH CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY CONCERNING ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. WILL BRING BACK REPORT. (2) PROPOSED THAT 3 STUDENTS BE INVOLVED IN POSSIBLE WASTE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION AND SCHOLARSHIP BE AWARDED FOR LANDFILL RESEARCH. (3) ANNOUNCED THAT THE ROANOKE CITY HAD APPOINTED MEMBERS TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE HAS ESTABLISHED FIVE PRIORITIES TO GO FORWARD WITH. MCGRAW: (1) ASKED BOARD MEMBERS TO REVIEW ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE MINUTES. (2) VACO-VML TASK FORCE MET AND PUT TOGETHER A RECOMMENDATION TO VML ON ANNEXATION. (3) COMPLIMENT LG FOR DISCUSSIONS ON MERGER WITH SALEM. (4) ASKED THAT ELMER HODGE AND JOHN CHAMBLISS BE APPOINTED TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE FOR TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF ISSUES. LG APPOINTED THEM AND SUGGESTED THAT ALL LOCALITIES INVOLVED HAVE TWO ELECTED AND TWO APPOINTED MEMBERS. NICKENS: (1) REQUESTED BOARD REPORT ON JUNE 14TH ALLOCATING HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES BASED ON LAST YEAR'S ALLOCATIONS. (2) MOTION, SECONDED BY ROBERS THAT $3,000 BE ALLOCATED FOR THE VINTON RESCUE SQUAD 50TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION AND $1,500 BE ALLOCATED TO THE COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES INFORMATION AND REFERRAL FROM THE BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND - URC GARRETT: OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPERS, INC. HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE OF PETITION TO A LATER DATE. I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. BLJ/RR WITH ADDITION OF ITEM I-5 AND DELETION OF ITEM I-1 FOR DISCUSSION - URC. R-52488-8 1. Acceptance of settlement offer with Roanoke Gas Company for destruction of backhoe A-52488-9 LG/SAM TO APPROVE AYES : BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS: HCN 2. Confirmation of Committee appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. A-52488-8.a 4 3. R-52488-8.b 4. A-52488-8.c 5. A-52488-8.D Request for acceptance of Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. Authorization to pay appraisal fee for Palmer Property. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Community School. J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ALFRED POWELL SPOKE OPPOSING ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET BEFORE FURTHER FUNDING REDUCTIONS K. REPORTS BLJ/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW 1. Accounts Paid for the month of April 1988. 2. Update on Automated Refuse Collection System. HCN REQUESTED MEDIA EXPOSURE ON SUCCESS OF AUTOMATED REFUSE 3. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures - April 30, 1988. 4. Report on Space Needs for Roanoke County. 5. Board Contingency Fund 6. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 7. General Fund Unappropriated Balance L. WORK SESSION 1. Flood Control for Roanoke River tributaries DISCUSSED EARLIER IN MEETING M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (1) TO DISCUSS A PERSONNEL MATTER. 5 RR/LG - URC AT 5:25 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) N. RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATION AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the Roanoke Valley Squires for winning the state AAU Basketball championship. R-52488-10 RR/SAM TO APPROVE - URC 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS (PLEASE NOTE: Petition of Glen E. Long and James W. Harris, Sr. t/a Valley Oliver Sales requesting rezoning to sell and repair farm equipment HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN) 588-1 Petition of Inland Properties Corporation to rezone a 1.70 acre tract from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business to construct an office complex located on the east side of Route 419 immediately south of its intersection with Cordell Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1988) LG/RR TO CONTINUE TO JUNE 14, 1988 588-2 Petition of Virginia First Savings, F. S. B. to rezone a 0.787 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-1 Business to construct a building containing a bank and offices, located immediately southwest of the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) and Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. RR/BLJ TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS URC 588-3 Petition of Occidental Development Ltd. to rezone a 2.0 acre parcel from R-1, Residential to B-1 Business and a 22.87 acre parcel from R-1, Residential to R-3 Residential to construct offices and multi-family dwellings, located immediately west of the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. PETITIONER REQUESTED CONTINUANCE TO JUNE 14, 1988 588-4 Petition of Hobart Companies to rezone a 14.93 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to construct an office complex, located on the north side of Electric Road (Route 419) approximately 700 feet 6 west of its intersection with Postal Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/RR TO APPROVE - URC 588-5 Petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Plan from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC 588-6 Petition of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Carson King, requesting vacation of a portion of an existing right-of-way known as Airpoint Drive for a width of 30 to approximately 0 feet beginning at Bent Mountain Road (Route 221) and extending in an easterly direction 365 feet in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/RR TO APPROVE - URC 588-7 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code to increase the imposition of the Law Library fee to support the Roanoke County/Salem Law Library. NO ONE SPOKE 588-8 Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Section 9-2, "Possession, Sale, Discharge, etc. of Fireworks": the repeal of Article II, "Fire Lanes"; and the repeal of Article III, "Fire Protection Code"; and by the enactment of a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code," to provide for the establishment of certain permit and inspection fees, and to authorize the enforcement of same. NO ONE SPOKE 588-9 Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.0-1:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. NO ONE SPOKE P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.0-1:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 7 SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 6/14/88 AYES; BLJ, RR, SAM, HCN NAYS; LG 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code to increase the imposition of the Law Library fee to support the Roanoke County/Salem Law Library. SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 6/14/88 URC 3. Ordinance authorizing the purchase of the residue of Reynolds Property/Spring Hollow Reservoir. SAM/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 6/14/88 - URC 4. Ordinance appropriating the funds for the 1988/89 year budget for Roanoke County, Virginia. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 6/14/88 - URC Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8, Adoption of state law of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. 0-52488-10 ONE PERSON SPOKE CONCERNING ORDINANCE BLJ/RR TO APPROVE - URC 2. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2988-6 authorizing the lease of approximately five (5) acres in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area by the County of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes. 0-52488-11 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC 3. Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Section 9-2, "Possession, Sale, Discharge, etc. of Fireworks": the repeal of Article II, "Fire Lanes"; and the repeal of Article III, "Fire Protection Code"; and by the enactment of a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code," to provide for the establishment of certain permit and inspection fees, and to authorize the enforcement of same. 8 R 0-52488-12 SAM/HCN TO APPROVE - URC R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. The Vinton Rescue Squad has requested to speak. DID NOT SPEAK THE FOLLOWING SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE LANDFILL SITE IN MOUNT PLEASANT AREA: 1. JOHN FERGUSON, 3868 PITZER ROAD 2. DONNA WOOD, 3876 PTIZER ROAD WHO PRESENTED A PETITION REQUESTING WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION. ECH REQUESTED THAT LG AND RR MEET WITH HUMAN RESOURCES AND HEALTHCARE CONSULTANT TO FURTHER DISCUSS BIDS FOR HEALTHCARE INSURANCE S. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:05PM 9 LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON &AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT P. O. BOX 20068 MICHAEL S. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA EDWARD A. NATT 24018-1699 MIC HAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD May 31, 1988 Clerk, Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 OF COUNSEL PHILLIP A. SHORT 703-774-1197 Re: Land Use Amendment - M. E. Hinman and Dominion Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a Certificate of Publication for the Laudig Land Use Amendment. I would appreciate your placing this with the Board's file in this matter. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERO ~ AGEE, P.C. ~~ Edward A. Natt EAN/pc Enclosure cc: David Laudig t'Klr+7v~i\t TI~CJ f, r'~i:~~~L:-v~r,J is ii fv ti i~ C C ~< - 7 t.i `1 l.) U ~ 1 u ~UuLiJl-t~i~sJ ~~t - yiLJ.Ui~ u~Tcrcrii.,uul ~i:tC~UJLJiV iYrTT r'+tittZUN L i+iaCC: 191`y cL~LTKI~ iZ~ ~~, ttiivlti~ VM ~4Uit5 ~THft rJ"r viivl~rN L 1 TY l.r r<uHiYt.Ji~L .rFi~i'v1T i;r P;ir~Iirl~Tii~v r I Tt~t L;vucr:ilV;'vCV ~ {+iV uFf=LV ~ li`~J-rtil.iKLu LL)r}~'vKril iu'r9 bil~ili.l3 L,ui~- i'ur;r~Tli..i;v 1~ r'unLi~HtK u~ Trit Kuriuun 11i°i~J L rvi.iil~„-ttitinJ• i-i uHLLY ~vcri;iPr~N~n +'~~LJrit_i. 1~v Kiii+l'rur<Zf II'u Trio ~T~T~ L#- vir.vi+~Ir, ui; ~~KT1rY Trt;aT Tr, r_ rs~r~~~x~i. +`YLTII.~ Y9 iiJ t'~l~L 1Jri C:.~ II~ JN1U !VtnJr Hl'~C2'1 .) u~v Triz ru~~urril~~~ u,'1t ~~/iu%~u cV~:~vl t5/1 t/uci %'vLi1~V~s r~ 1 T. v~ :i j r i ri~,:y---1-~'~-(~ i-i r~ Y ~ F- 1~. ~ Y 1 y~ c ~ ~ a ..._ + / [: t' ~- i 1, C hC s J 3 I ty !'1 ~i ~ L LEGAL NOTICE No11ce Is hereby given to all In- terested persons that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Vlrpinia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 D.m., at the Roanoke County Administration Cen- ter, at 3738 Brambleton Ave- nue, Roanoke, Vlrpinia, on May 24, 1988, on the petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to amend the Land Use Plen of Roanoke County for designation of a 3.56 acre tract east of Tinker Creek on Hollins Road from Development Lend Use Desip-~ nation to Transition Land Use Designation, pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, sold parcel of land being more particularly described as fol- lows: A 3.56 acre parcel of land, gen- erally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tin- ker Creek wlth(n the Hollins Ma0lstarial District and re- corded as part of Parcel No. 36.16-3.1 In the Roanoke Coun- ty Tax Retorda. A copy of tha Zonlnp Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents re- lated to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 et Roanoke County Administra- five Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Vlrpinia. Roanoke County will provide as- Slstallte to handicapped per- sons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the Coun- tyoffice of Personnel Services', (703) 772-2018 If special provl- i stone are necessary for often-' dente. Given under my hand this 6th day of May, 1988, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County (710) LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON &AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT P. O. BOX 20065 MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE VIRGINIA EDWARD A. NATT , MIC HAEL J. AHERON 24OIH-1699 G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD May 31, 1988 Clerk, Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: The Hobart Companies, Ltd. Rezoning Gentlemen: OF COUNSEL PHILLIP A. SHORT 703-774-1197 Enclosed please find a Certificate of Publication for The Hobart Companies, Ltd., rezoning. I would appreciate your placing this with the Board's file in this matter. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON S AGEE, P.C. Edward A. Natt EAN/pc Enclosure cc: Air. Bruce Hobart t\I:M~Vi\~ TINL'J c. rvl:t~~U-PtiCttiJ Nll iJ~.3I"7 ~1.:(t - 71J~11L2~~:3 rUt;LI~Y1c1~~J F-tt - ~iu7.9c ::Li~l+fti; ~+ +~VN~ Iyl~ ~~.il.Ttlil. ilU Ji^i nip!-i~titi~t VH L;tulcs ;,TH1t iF V1hvI~vl~ C IY r,:~ ttlJi?~v~r;c Hf'~'ILM1/1T lid- t~iJt7~il,HllL;iV 1 . i T t-, is a/ r""r i~ ~ r` :i ~ i\ c u l ~+ tV a i~ #~ i i. t t< ~; "r TIMzS-w~~~L'v i,tJrt'~;t~HTlu~v, wt~il.H LuK- t}un~7 IU,V l;, f'.i~Ll:itlCrt ~f~ 3ri. t{iJH;`~ui~c T lhitJ G NL.LKLL-~tityrJ r t+ uh 1LY ~vtwJi'wr/CK r~;o~I;~tit.i I.J n.uriitiurtr_•• `r THE ~Thl~ ur Vtii~rV1H• L l.~}tT1~=Y THr1T Tt~ N~v~vt=x;~u ~ViJiil.C 4tiNJ NUCI.iJHtu lid JrilU +titYtiJi-'Ht'thCJ l:tV I ttC FiJLI_Jrr LIVV uH ~~,~ U5/IU/t~t5 rVtl'i,'Vv O>/17/3tj t=tit~vl'Jb r~ITivc~S, Ttyi~--itiY ~f~st~^r,Y lyc '~~ LF 1l.crcaJ Jlu;tin~l1K~l/ LEGAL NOTICE Notice Is hereby Oiven to all in- terested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Su- pervisors will hold a public hearin0 at their evenin0 ses- slon beplnniny at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 21, 1989, In the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center, 3739 Bramblefon Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Vir- plnla, on the petition of THE HOBART COMPANIES LTD. requestin0 rezonlnp from R-1 Residential to B-1 Office of a tract contalnin0 U.93 acres and located on the north side of Electric Road (Route 119) approximately 700 feet west of Postal Drive in the Windsor i Hills Ma0lsterial District. Rezonin0 has been requested fo construct an office complex to be known of Colonnade II. The County Planning Commission ~ recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the ZoninO Ordinahce of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as s eoDY of the petition, site plan, and other documents re- laced to ffiis request may be examined In the office of the Department of Plannln0 and Zonlnp, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Adminis- tration Center. Roanoke County will provide as- sisfance to handicapped per- sons deslrin0 to attend public heerin0s.Suchindivldualsare requested to contact the 4oun- ty office of Personnel ~fvices (703) 772-2018 If sped ~rovi- sions are necessary fo atten- dance. Given under my hand this 5th day Of May, 1988. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (14ese1 MAJOR WATERSHEDS IN ROANOKE VALLEY N /~~ Y \ • $ ~~ /- ~ ., ~ ~ !or! /'''~_ ~ < ,~p,rp~T ~ x is GO. / ~OM'E CCO\, ~ ~ G~%~O~O 10 c o Po',pol' ~ ~m B ~ 14 ~ v. ,~ ~ ^ ~ 1 G Gp. I 5 7 ' q, t~~ 1 `~ ,~64 ~0~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 7 A ~ 9 ~ O VMIT 16 _ '~r - •~ l 1 2 ~ ~~ ~ `,J ~ ~ ~~ 12 ' 13 ~~ ~~ ~J I I BACK CREEK 2 BOWMAN HOLLOW ~ ! BUTT HOLLOW 1 4 COLE HOLLOW S DRY BRANCH ~ o ~ `0 6 GLADE CREEK ~Is OBE GO• 7 BI&H BRANCH ~ ~~ B HIGH BCHOOL BRANCH ~I~ ~~ 9 LICK RUN ~ "' f~' 10 NAiON CREEK p10 i2 MURRAYK RUNEK ~~ IS ORE QRANCH 11 PAINT BANK BRANCH / sL r0 Co. ~\ IS TINKER CREEK 16 TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB 17 WILIIAM& BRANCH ~~un I B CRAVEN CRFEK ~Q 4 WATERSHED AREA AND NUIIdER g 4 ~ ~ 1 0 sCALE-wLES LOCAL WFLOW AREAS FOR ROANOKE RIVER CSlC HA'IN SCALE IN MILES Carvin Creek Confluence Area Damages Probability of Flood Damage Number of Location of in Any Given Year ----------------------------- Structures ---------------- Structures -------------- 0.50 21 Sun Valley 0.25 16 Sun Valley 1 Greenway Drive 1 Darby Road 0.125 10 Sun Valley 1 Greenway Drive 0.10 1 Sun Valley 0.066 7 Sun Valley 3 Greenway Drive 0.05 8 Sun Valley 1 Greenway Drive 0.04 1 Sun Valley 0.033 3 Sun Valley 1 Greenway Drive 0.02 16 Sun Valley 1 Greenway Drive 6 Darby Road 0.01 ------------------------------ 18 --------------- Sun Valley ---------------- Total 101 Sun Valley 8 Greenway Drive 7 Darby Road Carvin Creek Wall/Levee Alternatives 1. Earth 2. Reinforced Earth a. Panels facing stream; earth slope facing houses b. Panels facing both sides 3. T-wall 4. Anchored T-wall 5. Concrete sheet pile 6. Steel sheet pile a. Plain b. With concrete pile cap 7. Roller-compacted concrete 8. Masonry COMPUTATION SHEET U.S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT WILMINGTON N C YO~,~ Sew r '-'' DESIGN ANALYSIS DATE SHEET No. ~ OF COMPUTED BY: C~,~~ CHECKED BY: ~.,.. rvrcm s~ ~ RCV ~ ~ ArK ~ YOU COMPUTATION SHEET U.S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT WILMINGTON N C C,YOSS- ~CC~ lv r^~ DESIGN ANALYSIS DATE SHEET No. Z OF COMPUTED BY: CC ~ CHECKED BY: `' PROJECT: CCk Y V I Y~ CYee ~, ~4 rYJ~"~ n V(~ FEATURE: ll'v I ~l-i r r~ ,~ SECTION - IJ TS VEE o~ ~Y) ~ X (Sr1 N Crt ~ ~O U F.~~ LI N r` ~EVE~ ALTC~.tilATl V~.S 1 S = Z rOY ~^~Y~ h ~, a -~C~,r 1~p I ICY COrr~pGlC1-tcf U~rCrc.tG VC Y -f t Gam: ! -~ 0.Ce C.QU I c~ ~ U~2.~ \N l~-h rp 1 le r - Cc m r C~ C~ c ~ G o r~ c, r e,-1 c ~n1 i -4 L^, -~'Qr m v~1 U~' k l..l NEAP r0o~ CdSTS AT 4VE~AC-~E NEIC-rl!,T (I I~~ E A rz-T +-i ~ 2 I C;~ 2CC. ~ Ce ~U F~-~ ~k I S`t 1 N C-~ ru~uu 2 E I N t•=U ~.CE ~ E q 2~i" H- N T 5 P.~NE~ S FACT NCr ST1?EAM L I N EP~-"L 1=00T COST AT ~ ~~o X10 COST WAS C~iv1PUTE D ~GIZ ~'A N EI.S ~3Crf N SIDES St N C E f\~ OS7 ~ F -tl~ E GOS I \/.I AS I N -f~-1E PANC-L S AI~,~ CL~ST WOULn ~3vtoUS~Y L~C,ELD ~ ~ Cod ~ ~ r... . v.. ... . a nL• ~ /\f R 1 ~pV COMPUTATION SHEET U.S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT t WILMINGTON N C YQx ~ SeC-t1 ~~~ DESIGN ANALYSIS DATE SHEET No. 3 OF COMPUTED BY: CSA CHECKED BY: Pao~ECr: CO~rv i ~ Cree(~ ~~o«nake C.a, o, FEATURE :~L~ ~I Vie, ~ F ~ ~ C~'~' w ~ ~ ~ (~ (-f-e Y ~4NCI-102..E D T- V~AI.L (N TS~ >t.l STf NC-r C~LJJrJT~ LINE ~ ~.~ /L, F ~~A SOP. ~.~ - USC SII.~II.A~.. roe o F tZa~ r- aa~-~ N ~r ~ ZC~ 5 /L~ \~ I~0 W~ ~ S I N 1Z~ 20 C!L -r- ~~ A ~~ (~ -r s> ~ 4 ii /~F ~1~~~IN~ C-rIZOUNG~,~NE .+n~ rv~cm •~~ RCV I~AYK IYBV INTERIM PRELIMINARY REPORT ON ROANOKE RIVER TRIBUTARY STREAMS, VA ... SEPTEMBER 1986 i ~ ~~~~i US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District INTERIM PRELIMINARY REPORT OH ROANOKE RIVER TRIBUTARY STREAMS, VA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION (pages 1-I - 1-6) .~ pq~tilPS~E •y- SECTION 2 - TINY.ER CREEX - ~c.o•~ '~tvo~t'~ Q,~+ojErT'7 (Pages 2-1 - 2-12) SECTION 3 - LICJC RUN , (pages 3-1 - 3-7) •1• SECTION 4 - CLADS CREEP (pages 4-1 - 4-7) SECTION S - DRY BRANCH , (pages S-1 - 5-6) 4- SECTION 6 - Hd.SON CREEX (pages 6-1 - 6-15) SECTION 7 - BOH1fAN HOLLOW $RANCH (Pages 7-1 - 7-2) SECTION 8 - HIGH SCHOOL BRANCH (pages 8-1 - 8-2) SECTION 9 - PAINT BANK BRANCH (pages 9-1 - 9-2) SECTIOIJ 10 - UNNAMED CREEK d.DJACENT TO I2 O'CLOCK KNOB ROAD (pages 10-1 - 10-2) SECTION 11 - WILLLAHS BRANCH (pages 11-1 - 11-3) SECTION 12 - BUTT HOLLOLI CREEK _ (pages 12-1 - 12-2) SECTION 13 - COLE HOLLOW HORNERS BRANCH (pages 13-1 - 13-2) SECTION 14 - GISH BRANCH (pages 14-1 - 14-2) SECTION 15 - CRAVENS CREEK (page 15-1) SECTION 16 - BACK CREEK (page 16-1) SECTION 17 - ORE BRANCH (pages 17-1 - 17-2) SECTION 18 - HURRAY RUH (page 18-1) SECTION 19 - HUD LICK CREEX (page 19-1) SECTION 20 - SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS (pages 20-1 ~ 20-4) EZECIITIVE SII?4~fARY The purpose of this report is to determine whether or not there is a potential Federal interest in providing flood damage reduction measures on each of 18 Roanoke River tributaries. Damages were reported on each of these streams following the flood which occurred on November 4 and November 5, 1985. This was the largest flood on record for the Roanoke Valley. Although individual streams were included in this study in reponse to requests by local interests, the overall investiga- tion was conducted under authority of the Roanoke River Upper Basin Study, authorized by a resolution adopted by the United States Senate Public Works Committee on 3 June 1970. This study concludes that Federal flood damage reduction measures are potentially feasible on five tributaries: Tinker Creek, Lick Run, Glade Creek, Dry Branch, and Mason Creek. Therefore, preparation of reconnaissance reports on these streams is recommended. No further Federal studies are recommended for the remaining 13 streams evaluated in this report. The main stem of the Roanoke River was not included in this study, since a feasibility report on flood damage reduction for that stream has already been prepared (1984), and is awaiting congressional authorization. MAJOR WATERSHEDS !N ROANOKE VALLEY •N ~' ~ ~ I .~ ~~ ., ~~~~ 4ti~cr Co to ~ 6 1< ~ ~ 00 J~'S GO // S 7 ~_ ~ `~10fGQ,0 3 1 4 ~'~, .. ~ ~ ~ fo f~,o 9 1 16 C •. .. ..^ ~ 1 i = le li f~~ I z' I z ...,. 1 ~ j • J I ~~.~ I BACK CREEK 1 2 BOWMAN MOL IOM 3 BUTT HOLLOW 1 4 COLE HOLLOM S DRY BRANCH ~ . 1 ~o~ 6 GLADE CREEK ~ ~ ~•~• GO• 7 OISM BRANCH 0 1' ^ + ` ! HIGH SCHOOL ORANCN +~ < ~ ~ ~ * f LICK RUN t~ a o 10 MASON CREEK l it MUDLICK CREEK 12 HURRAY RUM /~ fl YO CO 13 ORE BRANCH . ~ 14 PAINT BANK BRANCH IS TINKER CREEK 16 TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB IT WILLIAMS BRANCH lB CRAXEp, GREEK If CARVIM CREEK LEGEND 20 PETCR3 CRECK s ~ ~ 1 0 ` 4' WATERSHED AREA AHO tfUlntQER sCALE-1.N~ES IOCA~ lItFLOW AREA: FOR ROANOKE RIYER REPORT ORGANIZATION As shown in table 1-1, further studies are recommended for five of the ributaries included in [his investigation. These tributaries are discussed ;n sections 2 through 6 of this report. The remaining 13 tributaries, in ihich no Federal interest was identified, are discussed in sections 7 through ~9. Section 20, "Summary and Recommendations," includes a summary of the .t reams investigated, flood damages, project plane developed, and benefit-cost •atios for those plans recommended for further study. The report concludes pith the District Engineers Recommendations. The report includes four appen- ixes as supporting documentation: Appendix A is a transcription of field otes made during an April 1986 field visit to study area. Appendix B con- ains the results of environmental field investigations and other upplementary data. Appendix C contains basin maps and stream profiles for he tributaries investigated, and appendix D consists of pertinent orrespondence. TABLE 1-1 Tributaries Investigated and Status 'ributary Recommended for Further Study? Discussed in Report Section: 'inker Creek Yes 2 ,ick Run Yes 3 lade Creek Yes 4 ~ry Branch Yes S :ason Creek Yes 6 owman Hollow Branch No ~ igh School Branch No g aint Bank Branch No g nnamed Stream adjacent to I2 O'clock Knob Road No 10 illiams Branch No 11 utt Hollow Creek No 12 ale Hollow/Homers Branch No 13 ish Branch No 14 ravens Creek No 15 ack Creek No 16 re Branch No 1~ array Run No 18 ad Lick Creek No 19 SECTION 1 Iatroduction 1-6 As noted previously in this report, a single specimen of the Roanoke logperch, a species which is currently under Status Review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for possible listing as a threatened or endangered species, was taken in Tinker Creek during preliminary surveys in August of 1986. During the nett study stage, discussions with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on potential impacts to the Roanoke logperch will be initiated. In areas where the bench channel may be constructed, riparian and visual resources .would be diminished by the removal of forest cover from one bank of the creek and wildlife populations dependent on these areas would also decline. Analysis of mitigation and landscaping needs, if any, to offset these losses will be examined in later study stages. Archeological and Historic Resources. Investigations will be undertaken during later study stages to determine if there are historic or archeological resources in the area which could be affected by bench channel construction., either through excavation or disturbance by construction equipment. Measures to avoid significant cultural resource sites, or the level of mitigation necessary should their disturbance be unavoidable, will be developed as needed during subsequent study stages. Environmental Considerations for Other Plans. As noted previously a dry dam may be considered for Tinker Creek during later planning stages. Impacts from a dry dam would consist primarily of temporary increases in stream turbidity. Operational impacts would probably be minor and largely ~depeadent upon the length of the floodwater retention period. Some stranding of fishes could occur as waters recede, but the magnitude and severity of this impact is unknown. If the dry dam and bench channel alternatives are jointly pursued, mitigation of habitat losses incurred from the channel construction could be pursued through habitat management on lands acquired in the temporary pool area of the dry dam. CONCLUSIONS--TINKER CREEK STUDY Based on preliminary analyses presented above, construction of a 75-foot bottom width bench channel from the mouth of the creek upstream for 1.8 miles would reduce flood damages on Tinker Creek. This improvement appears to be potentially economically justified, technically feasible, and environmentally acceptable. However, the bench channel plan would provide only a partial solution to the flood problem, since substantial residual damages would remain. Therefore, additional measures to provide a comprehensive solution to flood damage reduction on this stream, including a dry dam which would benefit the entire downstream area, along with floodproofing and flood plain evacua- tion, will be considered in the Reconnaissance Phase, if authorized. SECTION 2 aker Creek 2-12 Project Benefits. The preliminary project benefits evaluated for Lick Run are of two types: flood plain evacuation and flood proofing in the 10th Street area, and direct flood stage reductions in the downtown area. Since damage potential will be substantially lessened in the 10th Street area, it is estimated that $33,000 average annual benefits will accrue in this area. Reduction of flood flowe to the downstream area by temporary detention of cater in the 10th Street area is estimated to reduce average annual flood damages by 20 percent. Benefits associated with this method of flood damage reduction are thus computed at 0.2 x $b38,000 - $127,600. Benefit Summary. ` 10th Street Area Evacuation $ 33,000 Downtown Flood Stage Reduction 127,600 Total Average Annual Benefits $160,600 Benefit-Cost Ratio. with average annual benefits estimated at and average•annual costs estimated at $89,331, the benefit-cost ratio project considered for Lick Run is 1.8. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS, LICK RUN PROJECT PLAN Due to the urbanized nature of the Lick Run flood plain, and the scope of the improvements included in the project plan, environmental associated with this plan would be minimal. At present, impacts are to be limited to those associated with construction work involving modification and relocation of flood-prone houses. $160,600 for the limited impacts expected culvert If a dry dam alternative is developed during later planning stages, the effects of this alternative would also be expected to be minor. The presence of an old landfill over Lick Run at Washington Park creates a situation where couch of the stream's biota has already been subjected to periods of inundation similar to those which would occur with a dry dam in place. The construction of a dry dam and the limited relocation of structures within the pool area Would probably not have a significant adverse effect on environmental resources. CONCLUSIONS--LICK RUN STUDY The preliminary p roject plan for Lick Run consists of modifying two cul- gerts for floodwater detention, removing 22 flood-prone houses, and floodproofing 5 structures. Based on the preliminary-level analyses conducted is this study, this plan is potentially economically justified, technically feasible, and environmentally acceptable. However, this plan will provide only a partial solution to the Lick Run flood problem. Therefore, additional measures including dry dams, should be evaluated in the Reconnaissance Phase, if authorized. SECTION 3 Lick Run 3-7 j; Project Benefits. The preliminary project benefits evaluated in this report are direct flood-damage reduction benefits derived by lowering flood stages. Stege reductions obtained from the 30-foot bottom-width channel were generally within the 1 to 1-1/2 foot range. The beginning damage frequency for existing conditions was estimated at about the 12-year frequency flood, and for improved conditions at about the 20-year frequency flood. Average annual benefits were obtained by first computing pre-project average annual damages for the 0.7-mile reach ($123,000). Then, after stage reductions for the poet project conditions were determined, the average annual damages for post-project conditions (residual damages) were computed ($85,000). The difference in these damage values ($38,000) was the estimated average annual benefit for the channel project. Benefit-Cost Ratio. With average annual benefits estimated at $38,000 and average annual costs estimated at $20,200, the benefit-cost ratio for the considered project plan is 1.9. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS, GLADE CREEK PROJECT PLAN Implementation of the bench channel plan developed for Glade Creek would temporarily increase turbidity levels in the stream during construction. Some stream shading will be lost due to tree removal and this will result in a slight increase in stream temperatures. Trout are particularly sensitive to these types of impacts and their effect on trout populations will have to be carefully assessed. Other sport fishes in the creek such as bass and sun- fishes, which are tolerant of moderate environmental fluctuations in their habitat, will probably not be seriously affected by the bench channel alternative. Project related mortality to these species, if it occurs, should be quickly offset by recruitment from Tinker Creek or upstream portions of the creek, provided suitable habitat still exists in the project area. The presence of a maintained bench channel would improve fisherman access to the lower portions of Glade Creek although it is not severely limited at this time. The esthetic qualities currently provided by the creek would be diminished by removal of forest cover from one bank of the creek. Wildlife populations dependent on this forested riparian area would also suffer declines. Analysis of mitigation requirements and landscaping needs to offset these losses will be examined in later study stages. CONCLUSIONS, GLADE CREEK STUDY The project plan considered for Glade Creek consists of a 30-foot bottom width bench channel from the mouth of the creek upstream for approximately 0.7 mile. Based on preliminary level studies, this plan appears to be economi- cally justified, technically feasible, and environmentally acceptable. Although the plan considered will substantially reduce flood damages on Glade Creek, significant residual damages, estimated at $85,000 will remain. ~erefore, other measures to further reduce flood damages, including dry dams, floodwalls and •floodproofing, and flood plain evacuation should also be con- ~ldered in the reconnaissance phase. Average Annual Costs. Average annual costs for the project plan con- 8idered for Dry Branch are estimated at $12,085, including $9,585 for interest 8nd amortization and $2,500 for maintenance. ' Average Annual Benefits. Average annual benefits from the project plan considered for Dry Branch are estimated at $14,270. Average annual residual damages are estimated at $4,260. Benefit-Cost Ratio. A comparison of average annual benefits of $14,270 to average annual costs of $12,085 results in a benefit-cost ratio of 1.18 for the project plan considered for Dry Branch. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS, DRY BRANCH PROJECT PLAN Based on preliminary investigations of Dry Branch performed in August 1986, it appears that the impacts of a channel alternative on the aquatic resources of the stream would be limited. The one-side only construction nethod would be preferred as~it would maintain some of the existing riparian corridor which would be beneficial to wildlife and in maintaining some es- thetic values. There is potential for enhancement of the aquatic system if permanent pool areas could be created as part of the project. These could possibly be created by low-head structures and/or additional excavation of limited areas of channel bottom. If permanent pools of one or two foot depth could be created, the fishery in the stream would be greatly improved and some recreational benefits achieved. CONCLUSIONS, DRY BRANCH The preliminary project plan for Dry Branch consists of channel widening and dike construction. Benefits will result primarily from flood damage reduction in a residential area of Salem. Based on preliminary analyses, the plan is economically justified, technically feasible, and environmentally acceptable. °~L-II02Q S ~ry $S.3nC31 CONCLUSIONS, MASON CREEK STUDY The project plan developed for Mason Creek consists of a dike, ap- proximately 3,150 fee[ long, to be constructed on the east bank of Mason Creek near Roanoke Boulevard. The dike will provide 100-year frequency protection for the vocational-technical school, East Salem Elementary School, and Salem Village Trailer Park. Based on preliminary analyses, the dike plan is techni- cally feasible, economically justified, and environmentally acceptable. tlhile the project plan will substantially reduce flood damages on Mason Creek, substantial residual damages will remain. Therefore, a more comprehen- sive flood damage reduction plan should be examined during the reconnaissance phase. As discussed in this report section, several flood damage reduction measures which would further reduce damages on Mason Creek were considered, but were not found to be economically feasible at the preliminary level of study. These measures include: (1) a dry dam on Mason's Creek; (2) a dike on the west side of the creek opposite Lakeside Amusement Park; and (3) floodproofing at Tultez Mill. These measures will be considered further during the reconnaissance phase if more detailed economic and engineering data indicates.ehey are potentially feasible. In the case of the Tultex Mill, Tultex Mill is attempting to sell this facility and move. Further studies will be undertaken'if another, similar operation moves into the facility. SECTION 6 Mason Creek 6-15 Damages from November 1985 Flood. The November 1985 flood caused s tru c- tural and content damage to 15 homes, 2 commercial properties, and a bridge as Well as damage to roads and sewerlines. Total damages came to $383,550. Average Annual Damages. Average annual damages on Bowman Hollow Branch are estimated at $9,310. PLAN FORMULATION, BOWMAN HOLLOW BRANCH AB above, moat reported damages have occurred within the 100-year flood plain of the Roanoke River. Any solution to the flood problem between Apperson Drive and the Roanoke River that does not recognize this apparent primary source of flooding will have little success in reducing future damages. ' The culverts under U.S. Route 11 appear to have sufficient capacity to handle larger floods. They were not a cause of damages in November 1985. Above Apperson Drive, U.S. Route 11, the damages have been relatively small and spread over a relatively large distance. By inspection, flood control projects here would not be coat effective. CONCLUSIONS, BOWMAN HOLLOW BRANCH STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem exists in Bowman Hollow basin only for the most severe storms. The primary damage center for these large floods lies within the 100-year flood plain of the Roanoke River. Unless flooding along the Roanoke River for these same sized floods is con- trolled, standard flood control projects on Bowman Hollow Branch will not be effective. It is concluded that there is no further Federal interest in studying this flood problem until flooding of the Roanoke River in this vicinity is dealt with. SECTION 7 ~^'man Hollow 7-2 .,,..,.. PLAN PORMULATION, HIGH SCHOOL BRANCH f The few locations that received damages during a flood of approximately a 100-year flood magnitude, November 1985, are separated by approximately 500 feet. The relatively small magnitude of the damages and the infrequency with which damages can be expected to occur would all indicate that any flood control project undertaken by the Federal Government along this portion of the stream would not be cost effective. The small estimated average annual damages may justify a backhoe or ditcher to periodically clean out accumulated debris from the streambed. This could be more effectively handled by the city of Salem with its own resources. CONCLUSIONS, HIGH SCHOOL BRANCH STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem of rather minor effect exists along High School Branch. Because of the small amount of damage in a few locations, it does not appear that standard flood control projects would be cost effective. It is concluded that there is no further Federal Interest in:studying this problem. SECTION 8 ~8h Srhaol Branch ~2 Average Annual Damages. Estimated average annual flood damages at present-day values to the residences and businesses located in the primary damage center are approximately $13,000. PLAN FORMULATION, PAINT BANK BRANCH Over 90 percent of the damages that resulted from the November 1985 flood occurred in two locations. The Key Manufacturing Company had $280,000, primarily in content damages. The Roanoke Restaurant Service and DHJ Partnership had $132,000 in damages to their parking lot and fence. Other damages of the flood were attributed to several residences, public roads, and to one other business. The Key Manufacturing Company has indicated that they will be relocating outside of the flood plain. When this occurs, over 60 percent of the poten- tial flood damage, $8,000 in average annual damages, will be eliminated. With less than $5,000 in average annual damages remaining, there would aot appear .to be sufficient cause to warrant Federal involvement in a flood reduction project. Even if a project were cost effective, flood control aeasures in the vicinity of the Roanoke Restaurant Service and DHJ Partnership could not be of Federal interest due to regulations prohibiting involvement where there appears to be a single beneficiary. CONCLUSIONS, PAINT BANK BRANCH STUDY This study has indicated that the flood problem along Paint Bank Branch is relatively minor, occurring only in severe storms, and only in a few separate locations. Steps are already being taken by some local property owners to remedy the situation on their own by relocating their businesses. For the remainder, it does not appear that standard flood control projects would be cost effective. It is concluded that there is no further Federal in- terest in studying this flood problem. SECTION 9 ~~ut Bank Branch 9-2 -;c,vember 1_985 Flood Damages. The November 1985 flood, believed to be of a 100-year frequency in size, damaged 15 residences and S bridges or culverts. Total damages came to $211,000. Average Annual Damages. Estimated average annual damages to the residences and public facilities at present-day values are $6,900. PLAN FORMULATION, UNNAMED CREEK The most effective measure to reduce flood water damages along this creek would be systematic and continued maintenance of the channel, clearing out debris that clogs culverts, and grassing the sides to prevent further erosion. Kaintenance of this kind is most appropriately handled by local governments. Other standard flood control measures by inspection would not be cost effective. Any channel work would require efforts over nearly a mile of rtreambed. The scope of damages is limited and the location not concentrated enough to warrant more extensive measures. CONCLUSIONS, UNNAMED CREEK STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem does exist along the basin of this creek. Because damage sites are spread along a relatively large stretch of the basin and because of the relatively limited nature of these damages, it does not appear that standard flood control projects would be cost effective. It is concluded that there is no further Federal interest In studying this flood problem. ACTION 10 Tamed Creek 10-2 CONCLUSIONS, WILLIAAfS BRANCH STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem exists in Williams Branch basin during the most severe storms. Because of the scattered nature of damage sites, the existence of four drainage basins, the stream charac- teristics, and the underground channeling of the stream in downtown Salem, it does not appear that standard flood control projects would be cost effective. It is concluded that there is no further Federal interest in studying the flood problem. ~; 'j SECTION 11 ~~ Williams Branch ., Flood History. flood reported. On shallow, a few hoc Pears that about a At West Main Street, the November 1985 flood was the first Butt Hollow Road, where the stream appears to be the moat es were flooded in 1978 as well as November 1985. It ap- 0-year flood will first cause damages. November 1985 Flood Damages. The November 1985 flood, believed to be on the order of magnitude of a 100-year flood, caused content damage to four residences and structural as well as content damages to one business, Northwest Hardware. The total amount of damages came to about $155,000. The wood frame houses are valued at about $35,000 each. Average Annual Damages. The estimated average annual flood damages to the residences and businesses located at the primary damage sites at present-day values are $6,470. PLAN FORMULATION, BUTT HOLLOW CREEK Two steps could be taken to reduce the potential flood damage along Butt Hollow. One would be to replace the culvert near Northwest Lumber, whose capacity was euceeded in the November 1985 flood. The other would be to enlarge the streambed in the vicinity of Butt Hollow Road where there has been [epeated flooding. The f iret measure, replacing the culvert, is road and highway improvement and thus not eligible for Federal funds. Additionally, Northwest Lumber would be the sole beneficiary of such a project and thus not eligible for Federal involvement. Excavating the channel of the stream along Butt Hollow Road would benefit the few homes affected by periodic floods. This task could be accomplished by a backhoe or ditcher as part of routine road maintenance. The relative size of this task would indicate that it would best be handled by the city of Salem. CONCLUSIONS, BUTT HOLLOW CREEK STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem exists in Butt follow basin. Because of the nature of the flooding and the relatively minor SCOpe of damages, it does not appear to warrant Federal interest. SECTIOIQ 12 Sutt Hollow Creek X2-2 Novembec 1985 Flood Dama es F1 Lively minor damage. In the business, the Windsor Avenue content and structural damages. 100-year flood and caused ^e, center accounted for 89 percent _. oods prior to November 1985 caused rela- November 1985 flood, eight residences, one bridge, and other public utilities received This flood is believed to be approximately a irly $240,000 in damages. The primary damage of the total damages. Average Annual Damages. The estimated average annual flood damages at present-day values to property along Cole Hollow within the city of Salem are 56,650. PLAN FORMULATION, COLE HOLLOW The city of Salem has already corrected one major source of damages during the November 1985 flood when it replaced the bridge on Windsor Avenue. This nev bridge appears to be designed to reduce the head loss and subsequent erosion and washout, not only of itself but also neighboring residences. Other measures do not appear to be cost effective. While excavation of the channel is possible, to do so along the approximately 2,600 feet in the primary damage center would be prohibitively expensive and not cost effective in terms of the eight residences that would then be protected. CONCLUSIONS, COLE HOLLOW STUDY This preliminary study established that a flood problem exists along Cole Hollow during the most severe storms. The relative size of the problem in relation to the cost of prevention is, by inspection, too small to be cost effective. The city of Salem has already taken the most effective step in reducing the potential for flood damage by replacing the Windsor Avenue bridge. It is concluded therefore that there is no further Federal interest in studying Cole Hollow. SECTION 13 Cole Aollow 13-2 November 1985 Flood Dama es. The November 1985 flood a (00-year flood, caused content damage to five homes and erosion damaXemately a culverts under Chamberlain Lane and Parkdale Drive, g to the their ceiling. Some of these basements are used as livinen crease flooded to heating units. Total damages in November 1985 were $64,42 most have Average Annual Damages. Estimated average annual damages are $2,700. PLAN FORMULATION, GISH BRANCH A consultant's study prepared for the city of Salem recommended that a culvert under Chamberlain Lane be replaced. This suggestion, aloe with cleaning up the channel as part of a routine maintenance g [o be the most effective measures for reducing floodPdamageswalon a Gish Branch. ppear g Replacing the culvert under Chamberlain Lane would qualify as re air or upgrading of highways and, thus, is not eligible for Federal involvement o funds. This does not a P control project. ppear to be a viable prospect for a Federal flood CONCLUSIONS, GISH BRANCH STUDY TES preliminary study established that a flood ninor scale does exist along Gish Branch. Problem of a relatively replacing the culvert under Chamberlain Lane~e city of Salem should consider highway repair, it is concluded that there is nos further Federal intsidered studying this flood problem. Brest in ~L?IO$ lk ~h gib 1,4-2 SECTION 15 - CBIPENS CBEEIC (City of Roanoke) Locatioa of Cravens Creek is shown on Figure 1-2, section 1 of this report. The study was requested by the city of Roanoke. Cravens Creek is 0,75 mile long with a drainage area of 0.33 mile. Field observations indicate negligible flood damages on this stream, even for the larger floods. Hinor problems are experienced by homeowners around a private lake. These problems probably could be alleviated by installation of additioaal overflow pipes at various elevations. - CONCLUSIONS, CRAVENS CREEK STUDY It is concluded that there is no Federal interest in further studies of Cravens Creek. SECTION 15 Cravens Creek ~! 15-1 SECTION 16 - BACK CREEK (Roanoke County and City of Roanoke) This study was requested by Roanoke County (see appendix D). Location of Back Creek is shown on figure 1-2, section 1 of this report. BASIN DESCRIPTION, BACK CREEK Back Creek meanders through Roanoke County for more than 25 miles with a small segment in the City of Roanoke. The segment in the city of Roanoke is in the area known as Starkey. Numerous small streams empty into Back Creek. The flood plain varies from narrow to small, open flat areas occupied by occasional small farms and pastures.' Development is sparse and scattered along the entire length of the creek. FLOOD DAMAGES, BACK CREEK Flood Damage Centers. Two areas on the creek are analyzed herein due to the localized nature of their flood problems in relation to the entire creek. Area one is at the confluence of Back Creek and Martin Creek by SR 696. There are about two dozen homes, trailers, and outbuildings distributed in the flood plain along the creek. Average annual damages for area one are calculated at $10,000. The second area, in the city of Roanoke, is called Starkey. The November 1985 flood destroyed a trailer court with 23 trailers in this area. Roanoke County now owns the property, which is vacant. Three are no current plans to redevelop the property. Average annual damages to the remaining property in Starkey is less than $5,000. November 1985 Flood Damages. Total county and city damages for the November 1985 flood oa Back Creek are estimated at over $2 million. This amounts to about $80,000 per stream mile. As noted above, one of the major damage centers in the November 1985 flood was a trailer park which is now vacant. Average Annual Damages. Average annual damages for the two areas analyzed on Back Creek are estimated at $15,000. PLAN FORMULATION, BACK CREEK Neither of the two damage centers considered have sufficient average annual damages to justify Federal flood control measures. Using an 8-7/8 Percent interest rate for 50 years, area one can only support a $111,000 expenditure and Starkey less than $55,000. CONCLUSIONS, BACK CREEK STUDY It is concluded that there is no further Federal interest in studying Back Creek. SECTION 16 Back Creek 16-1 PLAN FORMULATION, ORE BRANCH Flood damage reduction measures for Ore Branch are limited and expensive. There is insufficient land for even a small reservoir. Diverting flows around the damaged property would require culverts under either the railroad or under a major thoroughfare. billions of dollars would be required for measures of this type. Damages are not sufficient to justify this cost. Bven though a Federal project is not feasible, there are techniques that could be accomplished locally to reduce flood damages. Runoff retention/restriction devices on developed property, especially the mall, vould reduce both flood flows and peaks. Keeping the stream clear of debris gad vegetation irould also reduce flood flows. The printing company could improve the opening under the building, allowing larger, less restricted flows Co pass under the structure. The building could also be floodproofed for even larger flows. Finally, removing the paved parking area adjacent to the branch behind the building would also improve drainage under the building. CONCLUSIONS, ORE BRANCH STUDY It is concluded that there is no Federal interest in further studies of Ore Branch. s~CTIOIQ 17 ire Braac3i 1~2 SECTION 18 - MIIRRAT RII1Q (City of Roanoke, Roanoke County) This study of Murray Run was requested by the city of Roanoke. Location of the stream is shown on figure 1-2, section 1 of this report. BASIN DESCRIPTION, HURRAY RUN Murray Run originates in Roanoke County and eventually flows through 3.5 miles of partially developed urban property in the city of Roanoke before emptying into the Roanoke River. There are several large areas along the stream devoted to parks and open space. Drainage through the developed areas is characterized by a narrow floodway obstructed by debris with small openings under roads. Hilly terrain and paved surfaces contribute to the speed and volume of water entering the stream. Flooding is not a significant problem until flows exceed the 100-year frequency. FLOOD DAMAGES, HURRAY RUN Flood Damage Centers. The most damaged area on the stream from the November 1985 flood lies adjacent to Towers Mall near the mouth of Murray Run. Flooding in this area is controlled by Roanoke River backwater and the property is included in the recommended Roanoke River Project. Therefore, this area is excluded from the Murray Run damage analysis. Damage along the remainder of the stream, in the City of Roanoke, is scattered and small. _November 1985 Flood Damages. November 1985 flood damages .were estimated at $200,000 on Murray Run. This figure does not include Roanoke River damages. Average Annual Damages. Average annual damages on Murray Run are es- timated at $7,000, excluding Roanoke River damages. PLAN FORMULATION, HURRAY RUN The average aanual damage value of $7,000 will only support a maximum flood control expenditure of $78,000, computed at 8-7/8 percent interest for SO years. This amount is not sufficient to provide flood damage reduction measures at the Federal level. CONCLUSIONS, HURRAY RUN STUDY Zt is concluded that there is no Federal interest'in further studies of Murray Run. SECTION 18 Murray Run 18-1 SECTION I4 - MIID LICK C8EE1C (Roanoke County and City of Roanoke) This study of Mud Lick Creek was requested by the city of Roanoke. Location of Mud Lick Creek is shown on figure 1-2, section 1 of this report. BASIN DESCRIPTION, MUD LICK CREEK Mud Lick Creek originates in Roanoke County and winds for about 7.3 miles in and out of Roanoke City and County before emptying into the Roanoke River. Urban development is distributed along banks of the creek, mixed with stretches of open space. Runoff from the hilly terrain, paved areas, and a small tributary combined to cause periodic flooding. Other factors contribut- ing to the flood problems are the small culvert openings under the numerous street crossings, and debris in the stream. FLOOD DAMAGES, MUD LICK CREEK Flood Dama a Centers. The largest flood damage center is located by the intersection of Edgewood Street, Brandon Avenue, and Mud Lick Creek. Flooding in this area is controlled by the Roanoke River. Flood damage in this area was considered in the economic analysis of the Roanoke River project, and is excluded from this analysis of Mud Lick Creek. creek occur at Grandin Road, around the intensecOt on ofmGar t Mill Road and Halevan Road, and around VA Rte. 79g. November 1985 Flood Dama es. November 1985 flood damages on Mud Lick Creek, excluding damages from Roanoke River flooding, were estimated at 5500,000. Average Annual Damages. Average annual damages for Mud Lick Creek, ex- :luding damages due to Roanoke River flooding, are estimated at $20,000. PLAN FORMULATION, MUD LICK CREEK The average annual damages described above will only support a maximum xpenditure of $225,000 using an 8-7/8 percent interest rate amortized for 50 ears. Substantial reduction of flood damages would require several culvert ~difications, channel work, and regular debris removal at a cost substan- Lally higher than $225,000. CONCLUSIONS, MUD LICK CREEK It is concluded that there is no further Federal interest in studying Mud L1ck Creek. SECTION 19 Mud Lick Creek 19-1 SECTION 20 - SUH2iA87 AND REC024fENDATIONS SUMMARY Figure 20-1, following page, shoos the Roanoke River tributaries included in this investigation, and identifies the streams recommended for further study. Table 20-1, pages 20-3 and 20-4, provides a summary of the results of this study. RECOMMENDATIONS I recommend that Reconnaissance Reports be prepared on the following Roanoke River tributaries: Tinker Creek, Lick Run, Glade Creek, Dry Branch, and Mason Creek. Reconnaissance Reports on these streams can be prepared under authority of a resolution adopted by the United States Senate Public Glorks Committee on 3 June 1970. I also recommend that no further Federal studies be conducted on the following Roaaoke River tributaries: Bowman Hollow Branch, High School Branch, Paint Bank Branch, Unnamed Stream Adjacent to 12 O'clock Knob Road, Williams Branch, Butt Hollow Creek, Cole Hollow/Hornets Branch, Gish Branch, Cravens Creek, Back Creek, Ore Branch, Murray Run, and Mud Lick Creek. ~~-~~ PAUL W. WOODBURY Colonel, Corps of Engineers Commanding SECTION 20 Summary and Recommendations 20-1 O~ ROANp~~ ~ ;A A 2 ~ o J .; .. a E50 $8 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A BeautifulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~u~tn~~ of ~~ttnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 24 , 1988 RICHARD W. BORERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT E30B L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT We, the undersigned, being five of the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby waive any defects in the notice of a special meeting of said Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to be held at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on May 24, 1988, at 2:00 p.m. for the purpose of discussing a real estate matter pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (2). Lee arrett, Chairman Ri and W. Robers, ice Chairman Steven A. McGraw c arry C. ckens ~; ' ~~ Bob Joh son!., ~` Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-0 7 9 8 (703> 772-2004 May 18, 1988 Ms. Mary H. Allen, County Clerk County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Allen: ~,~ ROAIVOKE VALLEY regional solid w~st+e ma ~mEnt bo rd POST OFFICE BOX 12312 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24024 703 981-9331 This letter serves as public notice that the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Z"taste Management Board will hold a work session with the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors which is anticipated to be in Executive Session to discuss acquisition of real property for public purpose in accordance with Section 2.1-344(a)(2) of the Code of Virginia as amended, on Tuesday, Nlay 24, 1988 at 2:00 P.Pd. at the Roanoke County Administration offices. Yours very truly, ~~~ e re A y Cromer Solid Waste Disposal A4anager ~ r~~, . Ui i u i c ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ 2' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24,1988 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgment of Certificate of Excellence from the American Society for Public Administration COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke and Botetourt County have received the Public Administration Certificate of Excellence from the American Society for Public Administration. This award is in recognition of the cooperative community, economic and cultural development projects undertaken by both counties. These projects include the Hollins Community Development Project, the development of the Tweeds economic development project and the joint construction and operation of the Blue Ridge Library. Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning, will be present at the meeting to receive recognition of this award. C. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: _ VOTE Yes No Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers _..- AWARD APPLICATION SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTION NAMES: Roanoke County and Botetourt County PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME: Cooperative Community, Economic, and Cultural Development in Southwest Virginia: the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt PROJECT/PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Traditionally "communities" within the State of Virginia have been defined primarily by political boundaries. The counties of Roanoke and Botetourt have gone one step further by recognizing that a community can also be defined in terms of service delivery. (See Attachment 1) The specific service delivery needs that the two counties have addressed include community development within the Hollins Project Area, specifically the installation of water and sewer facilities, the construction ofroadways, the rehabilitation of housing, and~.the development of a park; economic development, specifically:~.the preparation of the Tweeds industrial site; and cultural development,~i.e., the construction and operation of the Blue Ridge-Library. The cooperative completion of these projects has resulted in a savings of $1.9 million to each of the two counties. The following narrative will describe the situation, goals and desired impacts, and realized impacts anal results of these three cooperative projects. 1. MEETING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS. The Hollins Community Development Project is a multiphased neighborhood improvement program that includes water and sewer installation: road construction, housing rehabilitation and park development. .The two counties have worked with Hollins citizens~to form the Hollins Community Development Corporation and to define community needs, plan the project, and seek financial assistance. An unsuccessful application for block grant monies was submitted to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development in August 1984. The two counties tried again in 1985 and succeeded in receiving approximately $2.65 million in funding from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development, the Farmers' Home Administration, the Virginia Water Project, Inc., and the Virginia Department of Transportation. In addition, both counties also contributed approximately $150,000 to the total project. The work in the Hollins community began in January, 1986 and is scheduled to be completed by March, 1989. SITUATION: The project area covers approximately 250 acres and includes 196 residents and 79 homes. Forty homes are located in Roanoke County and 39 are situated in Botetourt County. About 81 percent of all households are of low and moderate income. At the time the 1985 application was submitted, 30 homes were not served by public water and 23 had no bathrooms. Those households that were using well water experienced poor water quality caith a high iron content. ° .~` Those with existing septic tanks were plagued by poor percolation of the soil and the backflow of raw sewage. There were no fire hydrants in the community. A neighborhood park facility was needed. The roads in the community were generally unsafe because of poor alignment and some were not accessible by emergency vehicles. GOALS AND DESIRED IMPACTS: Water. Replace existing inadequate system. Extend water system to supply all homes within the community. Provide adequate water storage and reliable fire flows. Sewer. Install a communitywide sewage collection system to eliminate health and odor problems. Roads. Improve hazardous alignments of four state maintained highways and upgrade three private roads to improve emergency vehicle access. Housing. Rehabilitate 38 units of substandard housing. Install batfi rooms within 23 housing units using pit 100 percent of all housing units have total P door plumbing re that Parks. .Develop a 3.5 acre neighborhood park facility. REALIZED IMPACTS AND RESULTS: -Currently, 19;000 linear feet of new four, six and eight inch water lines .are being installed. In addition, 13 fire hydrants and a 200,000 gallon storage tank facility are also .being installed. Approximately 20,000 linear feet of new eight. and 12 inch sewer lines as well as~lOl manholes are being installed in conjunction with the water system. Construction is underway to improve State Routes 648,1905; 1890 and. 752. Improvement work has begun on three private roads which will be brought into the state system. Land has been purchased for the development of a 3.5 acre park.' The design for the park is completed and construction will begin shortly. Forty-three substandard homes were rehabilitated exceeding the project goal by five. units. Bathrooms have been installed in all housing units which were formerly using pit privies. Each county has realized a cost savings of $1.2 million by sharing the financial responsibilities for the project. 2. MEETING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .NEEDS. The Tweeds, Incorporated economic development project is located on a 60'acre site that straddles the county line at the intersection of U.S. 460 and Route 604 (alternate U.S. 220). Roanoke County and Botetourt County have applied jointly to the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development for a grant of $192,640 for site improvements. In addition, the Virginia Department of Transportation has committed $85,000 for industrial access construction and an additional $210,000 has been pledged by the two counties. Tweeds, Incorporated, a nationally recognized mail order clothing firm has committed $3.45 million for capital investment on the site. The total project costs will be approximately $3.94 million. The Tweeds facility is scheduled to be operational by January, 1989. r , ' SITUATION: Currently, Botetourt County has no ready-to-go industrial sites. Roanoke County has nine acres of land that is ready-to-go for industrial development. Tweeds will use approximately 20 acres of an approximate 60 acre industrial parcel immediately adjacent to the Blue Ridge Library site. The project will result in the creation of at least two additional ready-to-go industrial sites which will be served by a newly installed 12 inch water line and an 8 inch sewer line. Storm drainage and transportation will also be improved with the completion of an industrial access road. Additionally, the current ratio of residential tax base to commercial and industrial tax base in Roanoke County is 84/16, whereas the ratio in Botetourt County is 87/13. The development of the Tweeds site will add $3 million worth of investment to the tax base of the two counties and will result in a positive one percent change in the respective tax base ratios. GOALS AND DESIRED IMPACTS: Jobs. In 1987,_1,655 •residents of Roanoke and Botetourt counties were unemployed. Initially, the development of Tweeds will lower the unemployment rate in both counties by almost eight percent. Industrial•Sites.• The development of the 60 acres will increase the availability •of ready-to-go industrial sites within both counties. Tax Base. Both localities will realize a shared increase in tax receipts of $56,125 each year. REALIZED IMPACTS AND RESULTS: Planning, engineering, and design work for Tweeds, Incorporated are in the design-development stage. Planning, engineering, and design work for the public off-site improvements are in the preliminary stage.. Architectural/engineering plans for Tweeds, Incorporated were submitted for review to both counties in March, 1988. Site grading is anticipated to begin in June, 1988. Construction of the Tweeds, Incorporated building is expected to .begin August, 1988 .and completed and ready for occupancy in January,•1989. In addition to the aforementioned creation of jobs and ready-to-go industrial sites, as well as tax base development, additional benefits of this project include a cost savings of $105,000 to each locality even if the recently applied for grant monies are not received from the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. 3. MEETING CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT NEED. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a Comprehensive Development Plan for Community Facilities on June 25, 1985. This plan called for a branch library to be built in the Bonsack area of Roanoke County within 10 years. The Botetourt County Board of Supervisors had made long range plans to build a headquarters library in the Blue Ridge area of that county. It became obvious to both counties that the two proposed libraries would be within a short distance of one another. ~~ Residents of both counties could be served b a Y. and no longer drive 5-15 miles to the nearest librarynfacilities in Vinton or Fincastle. In March, 1985, the respective Boards of Supervisors supported and endorsed the Roanoke County and Botetourt County Library Boards in their cooperation to formulate a plan for construction of a joint librar committee was established by the respective]librarybboardsuto discuss potential sites, management, and funding. This venture is the first of its kind in the State of Virginia. The total cost to construct the Blue Ridge Library was $872,000. dedicated and opened to the public Sunday, April 9,T1g881brary was SITUATION: As a headquarters, the joint library will serve all of Botetourt County. As a branch library, the Botetourt service population includes all of the Blue Rid e Ma Cloverdale precinct of the Valle Ma istexialDDistrict nd the Roanoke County branch library service population represents the Bonsack Community Planning Area. The 1980 population within the total service area totaled 23,270 bY:'1995 this population will increase etoo29,613 is projected that .'the development of the Blue Ridge Librar People. Without meeting facilities would be available withinnthisbservice areaunity GOALS AND DESIRED IMPACTS: Library Services. Provide library services to an area within Roanoke and Botetourt counties currentl approximately 23,•000 Y populated by necessary space for a headquarters facility rfor Botetourt1Counte and a branch library for Roanoke County. The building will be 8,000 square feet in size with space for the storage of 30,000 volumes as well as a community meeting room. Economic Development. The Blue Ridge Library is situated immediately adjacent to the site where Tweeds, Incorporated will construct its new facility. The existence of a visible public facility such as a library will enhance the attractiveness of the total industrial tract for future economic development. REALIZED IMPACTS AND RESULTS: The Blue•Ridge Library was constructed with a grant of $215,000 from the State of Virginia and an appropriation of $328,405 from each of the two counties. Each count $554,000 of the total costs that would have been P equiredeto construct a similar facility if owned and operated by one locality. Botetourt County and Roanoke County have agreed to share annual operating costs of the facility. One hundred and ninety customers made use of the library on its first day of operation, April 11, 1988. . > ~-~. Project Contact: Rob Stalzer Director of Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 703/772-2091 Additional persons responsible for the success of these projects: Roanoke County: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development Sue Palmer, Community Development Coordinator George Garretson, Director of Libraries Botetourt County; John Williamson, County Administrator Ned McElwaine, Assistant County Administrator Bonnie Newlon, Assistant County Administrator Stephen Vest, Director of Libraries o, -_~i -~ ` \~ ~~ _ ru~~'b / S \ ~I~N \J :~ ,~ / .t .~ , / `, 1 ~J n I `! i ~.~ 'f o o @r _ 1 ~v NIy r ..~..~ ~___` r°~ . ; ~~~ ~~ o 1 ~. (' ..'tiaM MIt1 i~ \~~ ~~''O~' I~ ~G OBI l M ~` F oF-.i. 5~~1 ~~' c r ~~ x~ ._ l_y~-!!~~~ • ~ S std: $~~~G ~. ~• .1JS~u.b}ti4~,t mil Q.. y 1 ~~-~ . ~~ ~ k @ i. ~~~ ' ,C ,o; i' 2 `l~ Y '~ b \' 'e~P`' , ~ '6 ~~ ..• ~~ ~\ Z 0 0' ~~ v E~ f~ Z ~ ~ ~ CZ.. Li..l ~ t- ..~1 f^ ~. W {..L.1 ..a 0 , L.L1 f~ .~..C ~ 0 Q~ ~.I..ai Q Q. 0 O ~-;. O U C ~ , a V\C - j~ tiF`,i t !. Y ` G.~ ~ V 1 W O ~ O ~ ~ CL ~, F-- Z W W (L cL o O J ..J W ~' w W ~ 0 u1 0 U ~ ~ ~ f- O ~ Z Z Q o W O U W U Z ~ Q ~ ~ Z D ~ ---~ W i . i ~ O O ~ J S F-- [Y] "~ N M ~y ~--~~ f- .Z W .. ' U 4 !-~ F- C _ ,, ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER C- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation Recognizing the Law Enforcement Torch Run for the Virginia Special Olympics COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• During the first week in June, police chiefs and officers, secret service and F.B.I, agents, military police, sheriffs, state troopers, prison guards and other law enforcement personnel will be running in the Law Enforcement Torch Run for the 1988 Special Olympics. The Special Olympics offers the mentally retarded an opportunity for athletic competition at no cost to the athletes or their families. This year more than 40,000 officers worldwide will run over 52,000 miles carrying the Special Olympics torch. The torch run in Virginia will conclude with the opening ceremonies for the Virginia Special Olympics on June 3, 1988 at the University of Virginia. The committee handling the torch run has requested Proclamations from all the governing bodies in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The proclamation will support both the torch run and the Special Olympics. Thirteen members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department will participate in the torch run. They are: Michael Winston Walter Eanes Don Dyer, Jr. Jeanie Bailey Rodney Patsel Terrell Holbrook Chris Nielsen W. W. Obsenshain David Flynn Gerald Holt Jeff Swortzel Tommy Valentine E. B. Obenshain a ., STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached proclamation be read and adopted, and that the members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department who will participate in the torch run be recognized for giving of their time to such a worthy cause. i Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ti AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~_ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 WHEREAS, the International Special Olympics is the world's largest program of year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with mental retardation, uniting the world on the common ground of athletic competition while fostering interaction and friendship between retarded and non-retarded individuals; and WHEREAS, in 1984 the International Association of Police Chiefs enthusiastically adopted the highly successful Torch Run program, and today Runs are conducted in every state and territory in the United States and nine countries; and WHEREAS, this year police chiefs and officers, Secret Service and FBI agents, military police, sheriffs, state troopers, prison guards and other law enforcement personnel will run 52,000 miles - twice the distance around the earth's equator - to open the Special Olympics; and WHEREAS, the torch will have been run across the Commonwealth by law enforcement officers starting the last week in May from points north, south, east and west, appropriately ending the Run in our State Capital. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County does hereby recognize and salute those local and statewide participants in the 1988 Law Enforcement Torch Run, who on the evening of June 3 will enter the Robins Center at the University of Richmond to symbolically light the torch - officially opening the 1988 Virginia Special Olympics Summer Games; and w ^ \ ~ r BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the Board of Supervisors calls upon the citizens of the County of Roanoke to encourage the Spirit of the Special Olympics - Skill, Courage, Sharing and Joy - so that athletes with mental retardation may reveal to the world these special qualities in which they excel. 2 C. - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR NATIONAL RECOGNITION AS AN OUTSTANDING SCHOOL BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was recently honored as a recipient of the 1987-88 School Program Award, and WHEREAS, the school was one of over 600 schools from the United States and Puerto Rico nominated for this honor by their state school superintendents, and WHEREAS, only 287 schools in the United States and two in the State of Virginia were recipients of this award of excellence, and WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was cited for its outstanding special education programs for the learning-disabled, autistic and emotionally disturbed children and for handicapped pre-schoolers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its congratulations to Principal Tom Hall, the thirty-five teachers and the 475 pupils of Mountain View Elementary School for their outstanding accomplishments, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its pride in Mountain View Elementary School and wishes continued success to all those who participated in this achievement AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION 52488-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR NATIONAL RECOGNITION AS AN OUTSTANDING SCHOOL BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was recently honored as a recipient of the 1987-88 School Program Award, and WHEREAS, the school was one of over 600 schools from the United States and Puerto Rico nominated for this honor by their state school superintendents, and WHEREAS, only 287 schools in the United States and two in the State of Virginia were recipients of this award of excellence, and WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was cited for its outstanding special education programs for the learning-disabled, autistic and emotionally disturbed children and for handicapped pre-schoolers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its congratulations to Principal Tom Hall, the thirty-five teachers and the 475 pupils of Mountain View Elementary School for their outstanding accomplishments, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its pride in Mountain View Elementary School and wishes continued success to all those who participated in this achievement. F On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TEST: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/25/88 CC: Bayes Wilson, Superintendent of Schools Resolutions of Congratulation File File ~_ s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO ROBERT MERLE BROWN FOR ALMOST 25 YEAR OF SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN was first employed in October of 1963 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN has also served as a Detective for five years (5> and Detective Sergeant since 1973. For the last thirteen (13) years, he has diligently handled all cases involving bad checks, credit card fraud and other related offenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROBERT MERLE BROWN for almost twenty-five (25) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. s s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION 52488-2 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO ROBERT MERLE BROWN FOR ALMOST 25 YEAR OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN was first employed in October of 1963 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN has also served as a Detective for five years (5) and Detective Sergeant since 1973. For the last thirteen (13) years, he has diligently handled all cases involving bad checks, credit card fraud and other related offenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROBERT MERLE BROWN for almost twenty-five (25) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /G~~ .J~ , Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Resolutions of Retirement File File ,._. ACTION # A-52488-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Fiscal Year 1988-89 Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: p ,/. °~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the 1988-89 Fiscal Year Budget. Several changes were made to the original budget document presented to the Board of Supervisors on April 12, 1988. These changes are summarized below: 1. To Balance the School Budget. An additional $140,000 was required to balance the School Operating Fund; $49,634 to offset the reduction in the School's share of the Data Processing Allocation; and $60,000 to balance the School Capital Improvements Fund for a total of $249,634 from the County budget. The following changes were made to County departmental budgets to obtain the necessary funds: Reduced: Board Contingency $ 10,000 Library 10,000 Transfer to Capital Fund-Flood Control 125,000 Miscellaneous-Potential Litigation 44,634 Increased: Debt Fund Interest Income-Schools 60,000 X249.634 The School Administration also reduced the School Operating Fund by $57,208, the School Capital Improvements Fund by $105,500, and transferred $100,500 from the School Bus Fund to the School Operating Fund. The net effect of these changes was to fund a 7.3 percent teacher salary increase and retention of the Elementary Art Program. 2. To Reserve Funds for a Dixie Caverns Landfill Clean-up. The following reductions were made to County departmental budgets to obtain this reserve: Miscellaneous-Potential Litigation $ 83,648 Commissioner of Revenue 6,000 VPI Extension 3,511 Solid Waste 121,380 X214,539 ~3. Other Funding Changes. The transfer of $50,000 from the Policing and Investigating Department budget to the Capital Fund for future capital purchases by the / Sheriff . ~- The purchase of a Computer-Assisted Assessment System for the County Assessor's Department rather than the purchase of three new vehicles. The elimination of one mechanic position in the County Garage reduces the Garage Fund budget by $21,924. The lease/purchase of the new one-arm mechanical refuse truck on July 1, 1988 rather than January 1, 1989. The truck will be purchased at a discount reducing the amount of lease/purchase proceeds required by $26,500, but increasing the amount of the debt service payment by $25,250 which will be funded by the Solid Waste Department. 4. Departmental Changes. The consolidation of the County and School Purchasing and Insurance Departments as of July 1, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The 1988-89 fiscal Year Budget totals $138,978,840. This includes the changes outlined above and all interfund transfers. The budget net of interfund transfers is $105,590,644. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the 1988-89 Fiscal Year Budget as presented. The next step in the budget process will be the adoption of the Budget Appropriation Ordinance. The first reading will be on May 24, 1988, and the second reading will be on June 14, 1988. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management and Budget County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Assistant County Administrators Reta Busher Diane Hyatt Paul Mahoney Keith Cook !~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SUMMARY OF PROPOSID 1988-89 BUDGET REVEN[JES Source General Fund: General Property Taxes Other Local Taxes Permits, Fees, and Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Charges for Services Miscellaneous Recovered Costs Commonwealth Non-Revenue Beginning Balance Debt Service Fund Utility Capital Fund Youth Haven II Internal Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Utility Fund Offsite Facilities Fund-Water Offsite Facilities Fund-Sewer Garage Fund Recreation Fee Class Fund School Operating Fund School Bus Fund Cafeteria Fund Federal Programs Fund School Capital Improvements Literary Loan Fund Textbook Fund Regional Special Education Gross Budget Less: Interfund Net Budget Fund Fund Transfers Amount $ 37,237,302 11,840,602 389,282 162,000 150,509 286,579 210,000 6,944,484 550,038 500,000 $ 58,270,796 5,384,542 40,000 318,716 1,009,074 866,699 7,772,382 92,353 197,956 226,826 183,159 55,155,722 1,125,000 2,564,812 1,151,011 535,000 2,981,000 425,633 678,159 $138,978,840 (33,388,196) $105,590,644 ~-I EXPENDITURES Source Amount General Fund: General Government Administration $ 965,825 Constitutional Officers 7,569,001 Judicial Administration 166,905 Management Services 2,439,275 Public Safety 2,481,760 Community Services 3,945,285 Human Services 6,584,059 Transfer to Schools 26,666,000 Transfer to Capital Outlay 816,699 Transfer to Debt Service 4,676,542 Transfer to Other Funds 441,710 Contingent Balance 50,000 Miscellaneous 1,467,735 $ 58,270,796 Debt Service Fund 5,384,542 Utility Capital Fund 40,000 Youth Haven II 318,716 Internal Service Fund 1,009,074 Capital Projects Fund 866,699 Utility Fund 7,772,382 Offsite Facilities Fund-Water 92,353 Offsite Facilities Fund-Sewer 197,956 Garage Fund 226,826 Recreation Fee Class Fund 183,159 School Operating Fund 55,155,722 School Bus Fund 1,125,000 Cafeteria Fund 2,564,812 Federal Programs Fund 1,151,011 School Capital Improvements Fund 535,000 Literary Loan Fund 2,981,000 Textbook Fund 425,633 Regional Special Education Fund 678,159 Gross Budget $138,978,840 Less: Interfund Transfers (33,388,196) Net Budget $105.590.644 ACTION # A-52488-4 ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Credit and Reimbursement for water and sewer construction to Trent's Trace COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: / // ._ / ~- / BACKGROUND: Boone Builders is developing a 42 lot residential subdivision along the north side of West Ruritan Road. The developer will provide public water service to this subdivision by constructing a 12 inch water line along West Ruritan Road from the 16 inch water line on Route 460 to the entrance of Trent's Trace. The developer will provide public sanitary sewer service by constructing a sewer line from the public sewer installed under Phase II of the Glade Creek sub-main project (adjacent to the City's Industrial Park) to the 42 lot development. The construction cost of both the water and sewer facilities are eligible for the off-site and oversized main credit policy and reimbursement policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Boone Builders has requested that the Supervisors authorize the credit of the second half of the off-site facility fees toward the cost of the off-site water construction. They have also requested a reimbursement agreement for a period of ten years to cover the remaining eligible cost not recovered with the credit of the off-site facility fees. The construction of this 12 inch water line from Route 460 to Trent's Trace will make public water available on both sides of West Ruritan Road as well as provide a portion of a planned water connection to LaBellevue. The estimated cost of the eligible off-site water facilities is $95,000. Boone Builders has also requested that the Supervisors authorize a ten year reimbursement agreement whereby the developer could recover eligible construction costs for the off-site sewer facilities required to extend the sewer from the County line to the north side of West Ruritan Road adjacent to 1 r ~~ Trent's Trace. The reimbursement agreement would give the developer 75$ of each availablity fee for sewer that is collected for services connected to the sewer line including the 42 lots in Trent's Trace. The estimated eligible cost for the off-site sewer facilities is $80,000. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative l: A. Water The Board of Supervisors authorize the credit of the second half of the off-site facility fees toward the eligible construction cost of the water line and further authorize single payment reimbursement at the completion of construction for the remaining eligible cost not recovered by the credit. This alternative would cost the Utility fund an additional $52,000 for the single payment reimbursement. B. Sewer 10 years The Board of Supervisors authorize a reimbursement agreement for a period of five years whereby Boone Builders would receive 75~ of the sewer availability fees collected for sewer services connected to facilities they install including the 42 lots in Trent's Trace. This alternative would not have an immediate impact on existing funds. Future sewer availability fees collected would be reduced by as much as $64,250. Alternative 2• A. Water The Board of Supervisors authorize the credit of the second half of the off-site facility fee and the Developer would absorb the remaining costs to construct the water line to his property. This alternative would cost the utility fund approximately $22,000 which are credited as the second half of the off-site facility fee. B. Sewer The Board of Supervisors would authorize a reimbursement agreement that would reimburse the developer 75~ of the sewer availability fees for the 42 lot development they are building. Future connections to the sewer line would not be a part of the reimbursement agreement. 2 -~ This alternative would cost the utility fund $15,750 which would be the reduced availability fee collected from the 42 lots in Trent's Trace. Alternative 3: A. Water The Board of Supervisors would not authorize the credit of the second half of the off-site facility fee. The developer would receive a credit of one-half of the off-site facility fees as required by the Ordinance and the developer would absorb the additional construction costs to provide water to Trent's Trace. This alternative would have no cost to the Utility fund. B. Sewer The Board of Supervisors would not authorize a reimbursement agreement for the cost of the sewer construction. The developer would pay all costs to install the sewer facilities required for the development of Trent's Trace. This alternative would make the cost to provide public sewer to the proposed development so high that the developer would probably develop the lots using on-lot sewage disposal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 10 years Staff recommends Alternative lA as it relates to water and 1B for sewer reimbursement with a five year time period. It is further recommended that the Board authorize staff to execute the appropriate documents with the developer to effect these actions. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~,ua./ Cliffo Craig Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to AC TION VOTE Motion by:Bob L. Johnson/Steven No A. McGraw to approve A erna ivgarrett # as amen e wit B au o- Johnson razing a en-year ream urse- McGraw men Nickens Robers cc: File Cliff Craig Phil Henry John Hubbard Diane Hyatt Yes Abs x x x x x 3 -z -~. NORTH _ _. i i PINFW~ DR -~•-L'-~~ i ~ ~. t ~ \ ` ~ , ~ \ ~_ .~ ~ ; t ' ~ -Z--' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- i ~ ~ ,i ~ ` 1 ~ ~, ' ~. ~• , .~ `/` ~t ,3 ~, ~ .~ _, i ~: t ~ ~ . ~\ ~ - -- - ~ ~: _ ~ i ~~ ~ MOCKINGBIRD HILL RD. HOMESTEAD _ ~ j _.~ .~ ,. --" i _. '~ ~ _ CHAL i COMMUNITY SERVICES Credit and Reimbursement for water and & DEVELOPMENT sewer construction to Trent's Trace S ACTION # A-52488-5 ITEM NUMBER ~ ' 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: May 24, 1988 Credit for water construction to Windemere Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Mr. Jim Buckland is constructing a 16 lot subdivision in the Castle Rock area as indicated on the attached map. The adjoining water lines are not of adequate size or capacity to supply water service to Windemere. The developer will supply water service to this subdivision by constructing 925 linear feet of eight inch line from McVitty Road to Windemere. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Buckland has requested that the Board of Supervisors authorize the use of a portion of the second half of the off-site facility fee for water so that he may recover the eligible cost to install the off-site facilities. The Utility Department will issue a credit of $8,288 as pro- vided for in the Water Ordinance. Board approval to issue an additional credit in the amount of $1,712 is requested in order to credit a total of $10,000 for off-site facilities installed. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative l: The Board of Supervisors authorize the credit of $1,712 from the second half of the off-site facility fee for this subdivi- sion. This alternative will permit the developer to recover the eligible cost for construction of off-site water facilities, and thereby make his water construction cost equitable to develop- ments that have adequate water lines adjacent to them. The cost of $1,712 to the Utility Fund is very cost effective due to the greatly increased water and fire service that can be provided to this area as a result of this construction. 1 Alternative 2: -..LJ .~ The Board of Supervisors would not authorize the use of the second half of the off-site facility fees as a credit. This alternative would result in the developer paying a higher cost for water construction than other developments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends .Alternative 1 in order that the developer can recover his additional costs of water construction which are required because the adjacent County water lines are inadequate to serve the development. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ -. 'n Cliffo rai P.E. g. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------- AC TION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to a rove Garrett x Received ( ) Alternative #1 Johnson x Ref erred to cc: File Cliff Craig Phil Henry John Hubbard Diane Hyatt 2 McGraw x Nickens x Robers x . rs00 ~ . ,.;r+p 1 , "^'~, Cf5/.E !h Si~nr,.~ •ItiiO i e .... GgUt'S~q, S. 6\s_ ~~ ,~ a~\'.. ` G ~~ P CII F~t1~` /. 4 1 1S, 'L! ~ hi 1 4„ ~ RO O ~ t oq ~~ ~ 1t 419 •~' o Cr°~ L ~ ~~osy~o 4NU "ttt~,~ •• ai9 ~ r aL ~= l f ~ ~<~r~ e A 1M( fA1 M ~ "0 c 1 E ~ a,..ti ~ ~G70N l1tKE ~ r •° ~ '~1 ~ • , TMA :,~ ~u Ti1 op w ;tVOTTMG c ~ ~r.,a~,e w ~~ 6+ ~ '"~1' ~ \\ ~ EtONHI •. ~~MTf11 `; 1n u VICINITY MAP>°" ., . J `" NORTH :v I ~- nu~eu w ~b ~~ a ~~ 4~ ~_i . j ` t I3 a Z ~ooa ~'iRFF~~ .._ / ~ 1 ~ ~ Rt. 4g ~~.~ . x {y =i~ .. iw~c ~ 21 ` \ 1 e \ uv. n ~ ~ ° s r, ` \ .. v - c..x. nw e.~ ~ a Credit for water construction to Windemere COMMUNITY SERVICES Subdivision & DEVELOPMENT ACTION # A-52488-6 ITEM NUMBER ~ -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOI<E COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to approve contracts with Airport Commission and Roanoke City - Valleypointe Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~.~ ~~-~~ BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: To successfully proceed with the timely completion of the Valleypointe Phase I Project, it is necessary to conclude certain agreements with the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and the City of Roanoke. The contract with the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission incorporates correspondence between Bob L. Johnson and W. Robert Herbert dated September 24, 1987; Commission action on Septem- ber 25, 1987; a conceptual agreement; and a letter dated March 17, 1988, from W. Robert Herbert to Lee Garrett. This contract will: (i) provide a basis for the conveyance and exchange of cer- tain parcels of real estate as authorized by ordinance adopted January 12, 1988; (ii) authorize the payment of FAA grant funds by the Commis- sion to the County as part of the consideration for this trans- action; (iii) provide that the County shall pay all costs asso- ciated with the grant agreement (These grant funds are special noise funds and would not be available for an accelerated noise study.); (iv) authorize the former owners to graze their livestock on the Ida Mae Holland tract with the County obligated to main- tain existing fencing; (v) require the County to enter into a contract with the City to provide for the signalization and intersection improve- „ . '~ / ments and to supply appropriate security (irrevocable letter of credit or deed reversionary clause) before the County may be per- mitted to enter upon the real estate; (vi) subject the conveyance of the real estate to certain restrictions imposed by FAA; and (vi) provide that the City or Commission, as appropriate, will convey the necessary right-of-way to relocate Thirlane Road; and (viii) obligate the County to the Commission for a.ll costs and expenses necessary to relocate the localizer equipment shel- ter (estimate $41,440). The contract with the City outlines the County's obligations concerning the intersection improvements and signalization at Peters Creek and Thirlane Roads. The County will bear all of the costs and expenses associated with this work, as well as the main- tenance costs for the signalization equipment. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: These costs are included within the $2 million authorized by the Board for this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) Authorize the County Administrator to execute the con- tracts with the Airport Commission and Roanoke City. (2) Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute the contracts with the Airport Commission and Roanoke City. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ ~~~ ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abstain Denied ( ) staff recommendation #1 Garrett __ x Received ( ) Johnson x _ _ Referred _ McGraw ~ x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney Tim Gubala Diane Hyatt ACTION ~ A-52488-7 ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Vehicle Utilization Policy COUN~~~~RA~°R MMENTS : p ~~~ ~~ ~• 7 5~ .il.<>~.~ R,ti"'l~ "t-(~, Y -I~/h.~2'~ 1 0 !.~`ti+., ..t,c-wD'~.,.~ ~~ / a7 , ~T C) Ci B A C K G R O U j~ ~ ~~ ~ ~c _~:c .,~ ..?~ ~•t.~J.L-u-'ut~ N D : ~~2/~vrrvt/f/f -~•v-L'v' ~ .~~%2~ ~2v~wa ~ ,~ At the April 26, 1988 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the draft of the Vehicle Utilization Policy was discussed. Suggestions which were offered by the members of the Board of Supervisors have been considered and incorporated in this report. We found that the Central Garage for the Commonwealth of Virginia has the responsibility of assigning automobliles to the various departments and also maintaining the motor pool. Any department of the state may request a vehicle which will be assigned if available. The state will require that at least 12,800 miles be placed on this vehicle annually to justify the retention. For casual use, the motor pool vehicles are available and charged back to the department at the rate of $0.17 per mile and the employee may drive their personal vehicle for reimbursement at the rate of $0.21 per mile. Based on the state guidelines, the proposed policy has been revised to reflect the 12,800 mile limit instead of the 10,000 mile limit previously recommended (copy attached). Attachment 1 lists 25 vehicles which have been identified as surplus and have been removed from the County's fleet. The savings on operating costs, gasoline and insurance for these 25 vehicles will be approximately $43,000 annually. Attachment 2 lists 3 vehicles requested by the County Assessors office in the 1988-89 budget as replacement items which will not be ordered. Attachment 3 shows an additional I7 sedan type vehicles used within the various administrative offices, which could be considered for a flat mileage rate reimbursement or at an appropriate allowance. JJ - Attachment 4 gives a synopsis, by vehicle type within each department, using the mileage ranges of 0 - 10,000; 10,000 - 12,800; 12,800 - 15,000; and over 15,000. Attachment 5 shows a detailed listing of the 366 remaining vehicles assigned to the County fleet. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative #1: Adopt the attached vehicle utilization policy authorizing the County Administrator to implement and enforce its provisions. Alternative ~2• Designate which, if any, employees should be considered for an automobile allowance (supplement to salary} and determine an appropriate monthly rate. This is suggested for vehicles included on attachment 3 which are driven 10,000 miles or more annually. The suggested monthly rate would be $225 per month for 10,000 - 15,000 miles per year and $300 per month for over 15,000 miles per year. This allowance would be in lieu of the $0.21 per mile reimbursement. Drivers who operate their vehicle less than 10,000 miles per year would receive the $0.21 per mile currently authorized. Alternative ~3• Delete any or all of the vehicles included on attachment 3 and reimburse said individuals on a mileage basis ($0.21 per mile or the prevailing State reimbursement rate} for business miles. Any vehicles freed up under this alternative, could be traded to other qualifying departments who have fleet vehicles, so that the worst vehicles within our fleet could be deleted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of alternatives #1 and #2 and consideration of the change in the mileage reimbursement rate when changes are authorized by the General Assembly. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~/JOhn M. Chambliss,~r Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: T,aA rarrAtt/Rnh r No Yes Abs Denied ( ) J dGarrett x Received ( ) to include: my 356 vehicles Johnson x will remain in fleet as of July 1, 1988. .'.~~ Referred To JMC/cw Attachment cc: File Assistant County Administrators Constitutional Officers Sheriff Kavanaugh Chief Tommy Fuqua Keith Cook Jack Council Mary Hicks McGraw X Nickens x Robers x ~' VEHICLE UTILIZATION POLICY Purpose It is necessary and proper for many County employees to have County-owned or personal vehicles at their disposal to properly perform their assigned duties. The County does not desire to curtail the use of vehicles that are necessary for effective service delivery, however, it is essential that guidelines be established to ensure that the vehicles are being used with the utmost care and discretion and that they are being used in a manner consistent with the intent of the assignment. This policy will establish the criteria under which vehicles will be assigned to departments, the criteria under which vehicles will be authorized for take-home by employees, and the criteria for equitable compensation for County employees utilizing personal vehicles in the performance of their duties. Policy 1. General Use a. County-owned vehicles may be used only for official County business. It is recognized that official County business occurs both during regular business hours and after hours for some employees. b. Personal use is prohibited under this policy. De minimis personal use (such as transportation to and from meal and break periods) is allowed under this policy. c. Only County employees who have a valid and current Virginia motor vehicle operator's license may drive a County-owned vehicle. In addition, only County employees or those individuals engaged in County business may ride in a County-owned vehicle. 2. Assignment of Vehicles to Departments a. Regular full-time assignment of vehicles to a department must be justified and proven cost effective A department's request shall be based on at least one of the following: 1. A vehicle is or does contain special equipment necessary for the proper and effective performance of County work. 2. A vehicle will be used for official County business a minimum of 12,800 miles per year or a minimum of 20 hours away from the office per week. 3. No other vehicle already assigned to the department can be reassigned on a time-sharing basis to fill the department's requirements. - 2 - - r-- 4. Documented evidence must prove that it is to the County's benefit from an economic or level of service standpoint for the department to have a vehicle assigned to it. (The motor pool has been eliminated at this time.) b. On January 1st of each fiscal year, each department shall submit to the Department of Management and Budget a listing of all vehicles assigned to their department. The list shall include the vehicle number, description, condition, and a brief justification as to why the department needs that vehicle. 3. Nighttime Assignment of Vehicles to Individuals a. A County-owned vehicle shall not be taken home on a regular basis unless authorized by the County Administrator or his designee. A list of vehicle assignments to be authorized shall be submitted by each department manager through his Director to the County Administrator annually on January lst. The list shall include detailed justification for each vehicle recommended and shall cite the specific criteria outlined below upon which the recommendation is based. This list may be combined with the list required from Section 2, but must also include the employee's home address, round-trip distance to the employee's residence, and a more detailed justification. b. The following criteria shall be used in recommending approval for taking a County-owned vehicle home on a regular basis: 1. The employee must answer emergency calls involving the potential loss of life or property where an immediate response is required. 2. The employee must routinely attend to work-related functions, away from the normal work site and outside of normal working hours. 3. Documented evidence must prove that it is to the County's benefit from an economic or level of service standpoint for the employee to have a vehicle assigned to him for take-home use. c. No employee may drive a vehicle to and from his residence outside of the County's borders without specific approval from the County Administrator. 4. Utilization of Personal Vehicles on County Business Employees using personal vehicles in the performance of their assigned duties shall be compensated for such usage at the current mileage reimbursement rate established by the Board of Supervisors (currently 21~/mile). These employees must receive prior authorization from their department managers or director and file a monthly report of mileage to receive compensation. May 24, 1988 _._ _f ._~ D O N O O] H ~ O W (n ~ W 2 J Q ~ F- 2 Q ~ I I ~ W I N O to I W I C J 1 W U I m ~--I I f 2 I ~ W I Z ~ I I I 1 I d' I Ql O 1~ O N ~--I O t\ O O M O O O t\ Ln lf1 O t0 Ln ~--I N O O p W Q 1 N O V O Ln .-I M I~ p tL') pp ~ f~ L['f p1 N~ O p O a' ~ M O Q W } I N ~ CO f~ O V CO O t\ N Lf) I~ ~ ~' ~ M p N N 01 N O .-~ N W J d' 1 M ti p 0 ti M O ti~~ O~~ p O O~ O M N O OO N CO ~ ~ W I H N e--1 N '-I r-1 N .-~ .--1 d I 1 I Z I O I H I O O O O O O ~~~~~ O O O O ~ i a a a a a a Q O O O O Z 1 W d 2 d d O I U 1 I 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I I M N O M c0 rl O W N CO CO O O O N N .-1 01 01 ~ .-I CO p1 O 1~ 1 r-1 N r-I e-y r-1 N N .-~ r-1 ~--~ .--I r-1 (V '--I W 1 C7 I Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I M M O M ct N~ N M t0 r~ B O N N Ol N p .-+ O M p LI') N W I I~ n N '--i p O CQ M N N LC) p1 I~ O ~ r\ N~ N M M ~ O N C:J I O O M N~ M~ cY M O tb M n~ Q1 tC') N M M Q1 .-~ ct N M Q I W 1 ~ N N M N M t~ W O tf) n C' t\ t\ M ~ N I.[) O ' N .--I i~ ~ I C .-I .--I .~ ~ c0 O~ .-~ '-I ~ CO O~ n .-I N N M Ol O l0 O~ I~ N 4'1 I N .-~ .--I .--I .--I .-~ .-~ M N N "1 r-I N I 1 ~ I J m I O E 1 O ~ I ~--~ Lf) .r Ln ~--~ 1~ .--1 t\ n p .--I O t\ N t\ n O O N a Z I .--I cY M 1~ O M ~--I I.() r\ _~ OO p .--1 rl N O n O N M ~ ~ ~ d' W 1 ~ U ~ C,7 d t\ N t/'1 Ct f~ ~ F C.•3 C.J C.7 d C.J U C.7 OC ~ d' t1' 0 U ~ W d' G' m ~ O O Q W W OO O'] O] O] O] F O] Q ~] d d d d ~ = 1 w I ~ I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I H F- 1 Z U Z 1 Z Q Q W I Q ~ Z d ~ I Q £ H 1 C C' ~ W Z Z ~ O a' I W W fn N O~ J Z Q N U Q 1 d d 2 1 ~ g 2 W ~ S D p 2 2 O O 2 O OW 2 W W I = O f- f- O p d U d W W In F- J 0 1 ~~ W W O~ U O V1 (n W O O~~ W H d W N (n W O a' d' I 3 0 Y Y~~ D~ Y}~ C.7 ~ E O O C.J H C7 O C7 ~~ O I Z d' U U } W ~ } C 1' W p } } C' C O Z U D U C !] } W d I W O Q Q J 2 O J= 2 2 O J J O O O O E O B O O J 2 W 1 Y W d d d U W d U U U 0 a a W W ~ !Z C.7 ~ C7 W ~ d U C' I I ~ 0 0 0 N t\ N N Q1 O 01 00 O) N l0 t0 1~ p Qt O n O p O .--I W I I~ cfl ~ z of r~ O W n N ~ n I~ ~ r\ r\ r\ ~ ~ O O W ~ n CO O I O~ 6~ O O 01 01 01 Ol O~ O~ O~ O~ O1 O~ O~ O~ O~ 01 01 01 O~ Ol 01 O~ 01 1 N .--I W W .-a r-1 r-I .--I '-I r-i r-1 r-1 ti .--1 r-I N e--1 N eti ~--I .--I .--~ '-I r-I N Q z w ~,._ 2 C J .. Q h QN V U 4-d N ~ aJ ~G TI W ~ O ~ W ~ E-1 00 U cn rn w a ~ ~ po o N O a ~~i ~N-t ~ ~ b ~~ ~ a ~a ~~~~ ~'I C!1 W J-1~ Schedule I .: 00 0 0 0 ~r1 ~n ~n o ~n ~~ N o t~ . N ~' rl 111 . M M M lD N !tl N r-1 ~' t/? th rl r-1 rl 01 Lf1 N lD ri N 01 r-I Lf1 N I~ r-~ rl M w •' O ~ ll1 lf1 O O 111 t~ N CO O O 'c7' ~' Q1 O O to rl M c1' M O N ~-.~ r•{ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O O M ~ ~ rl ri I N r1 rl r--1 ~ I~ M ri r~ ~ . • N a..1 •~ ctY D •.-1 N C U} N~~ A N N O N N O C 2„--~ r-1 ~-t a..1 ~- -1 -r1 rl ~ j • H •.-f t~ .C ~ ~ 'J .C 'J ~ 'G Q ~~~~ H~ C» G ~ ~ ~ .1J 1~+ 10-1 •U •U •U C U • ~ w • • •r+ • ~ O O O ~ O ~ O 1a ~ •-~ c~aaa -tea 1aa U •'•I C Sa O cn ~-+ D U to ~' ° a 28 '~ 1 v _ • d !Q N ^ ~ ~ U ~ 1 -1 U O ~ \ NN O 1..+ ~-- •-+ O ~ ~ v 'x U p ~ 0 ~ n ~ u i c a ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ w •.~ ~ w W U J Z F- W _ ~ C7 Z r-~ C.7 Z ~ N N ¢ N J W ¢ J H- U O ~--~ F- S W O oC O W O 7 O ~ N 1 J I ¢ I O O Z I ~ ~ Z I Ln ¢ I N .-~ 1 N W W (,~ d w i ~ I ¢ I •• I H I Z I W I ~ I W I N 1 ~ I 1 m I f I I W I ~ I W ~ C7 I J O W N H H E- I O I O 000 I O I N I O .-I I .-H I .-a .--I N N .--I p .--I ti '"I r'I N r-1 ~--I "'I d' N ti ry '-I N r-I r-I r-I .--I ~ "'~ N ~--1 ~"I ~--~ •--1 N O I O I N O I W 1 U O ; N j I W C' I U W I I j N ~ W ¢ I N ~ f/f 1 I Z Z Z ~ ~ 2 t/1 I ¢ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z I W ¢ U I V1 (n _ ~ = D (n O ~ O H j N ¢ ~ ~ ~ U 2 ' ~ O Z O I ~- Z F" W U ti ~ W ~ ~ Z Z i-r 2 H p ~ ti ~ N Z Z ~ ¢ ~ .-~ J = Q Q W ~--~ Z ~ z p Z Z ~ z W Z j ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ I- ¢ U ¢ Z U ¢ Z ¢ O w .-I >w ~° z° ° o z p ~ ° o o z o ° ~-' N '~ w ¢ cn r W ¢ w j w Z ~ r- cn cn cn ~ cn cn Z ~ ¢ U W p C' ~ f O W O ~ r f ° ° J Z o <n Z ¢ (n ~' H O Y ¢ •-• U O J > ~ v~ fn ¢ Z Z C F~ W z Z N ~ ¢ W O ~ J N Z ¢ fn O ~ m ~ O U W U ¢ ' N ~ d U .-. O C 3 d ¢ C.J ~ J U ~- r-- W C7 Z ¢ W i C7 i C I W I Q z H W co z z .. J W ¢ J H ~ O H 2 ~ O W O '.7 ~ N 1 O O O O O O ~ N .--I r-I 1 1 I 1 I 1 M I I I I II I N 1 1 I II O 1 1 II W O O I I II C.7 O 00 I I ¢ O • N 1 I I I II J O rl e--I I I 1 I II II ~ I I II (n 1 1 I 1 II ~ W J I I I I t0 II II U ~ Z I 1 II 3 I I U O I I I 1 II II O Z 1 O I 1 J ¢ ~ II 3 J ¢ O I i II ~ O 1 I II W J rl I 1 II C.J ¢ 1 I II ¢ 1 1 II J ~- 1 1 II r-i J I 1 II E 2 1 W I 1 ¢ Z J I O U to 1 W ~ O •-• fn I ¢ x ¢ 1 Z W J 1 O ~ ~ U 1 r-~ O ¢ W ~ J W ~-I ~ f V7 Q' Z W O a H U ~ N F- d O W p Z W 64 W ~ N E ' W W F' ¢ 2 J O U ¢ d ¢ H O 2 H W D O H- Z W ~ ~ C O ¢ O W O ~ ~ V1 .~ W C;J J E O ¢ O W O } . ~ N (n .r W CJ J N F- _~ J ~ O ¢ W O W C7 O } ¢ \ -1 O In ~ ~ J U° ~ _Z f ¢ K U tY O ¢ Z O W O O >- O ~ cn W W N U° J ¢ ~--~ I O] f i I Z ¢ I ~ I W I N I Z ~ 3 1 O I O ~ I ~ 1 ~ I Z 1 ~ 1 O 1 U 1 W j 2 1 ~ 1 o F-- ~ 1 H I"_ H I ~ N Z 1 O O W 1 U U U I 1 CG O O N 1 O I CO LL7 O ~' I ~ ~ O N I 1~ 1 ~ I N 1 M I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ N L!7 N I ~ I ~ M lf) pp 1 r-1 1 N 1 M I ~ O O O I OQ O O N I ~ I .-1 I ~' M L[') ~ 1 t\ I H 1 N 1 i ~ i I I 1 ~O O O ~ I I O ~ ~ -I ~' I~ V ~ I n I .--I C7 a E N O J N f J O ¢ O G.7 p H ~ N O O I~ cp W U ~ W O Z p O v ss ¢ w o Z v Z iNr C' H ~ ~ J ~ Z d' ~ I-I G.7 F ¢ ~ "' •~..~ W G7 Q J Z J Q Q r-1 W Q W d C.7 I K I •• W I Q I d 1 w I 0 1 z 1 = I ~_ I I 3 I W j U' 1 Z I Q 1 ~ I W I U' Q _J f Y a Q U F- Z Q •- H Q H W S ~ C7 Z I--~ C.7 Z r-~ h N Q N J W Q J F- U O ~--I H 2 W O ~ O W O O ~ ti O O OCO O ~[f ti ~ II I I I I '" ~" rr o 0 0 rl ti r-I N rl .--1 r-I .y N 1~ r,p O .-1 ~' N N I~ O N ti ~ V O O '~ N .-+ ~ M M N O I W O OO O I 1 m Q N I J O .--I 1 .--I 1 Q 1 ~ 1 Q 1 I I- ~ ""I .--I .-I .-1 N M Z M I 1 !n O I W I O 1 J O O ~ 1 I U r-i O 1 2 .ti I W I ~ 1 O 1 I .--I N J 1 i ~ Z Z O O N U I Z Z Z Z Oj H W I -i S Q ~ ~ Q Q W Q Y Q W J O D = O Z U O Q O Q ~ Q Q Z Q ~ U 1 I W V7 W (n (n ~ -I Z D ~ D J_ O 0 W N ~ d ~ Z (n Z N N N N ~ N N O O N W ~ ~ C K H N _ ~ Z' rte.. O _ C' ~ _ p . .i O W ~ _ ~ U H D f Q W t% ~ '"" ly U Z 0 Z _U W ~ O K ~ W ~ ~ J Z ~ G' d' I ~ ~ ~ -r d' ~ _ ~ O _ U Q U = U N 7 Z Z J ~ Q U l.L ~ ~ 1 1 I 1 I I H > ~ U (n N d W W W W W W O Y ~ ti W W W W W Q d Z = O W ~ ~ O F- ~ ~ ~ C C ~ O O O W U U ~ N N N N ry N c !-~" H I 1 ~ r-I N O .--1 e-~ C O O •--I .--I Z H w 1 1 ~..~ S ~ 1 C7 Z I .~ C7 I Z ~--~ 1 N 1 ~ 1 Q 1 J W I 1 ~ .--I ~ N ti ~ N O .--i '-I ~ 00 •"I .--I M .--I .--I Q J I . -I ~ .--I ~ .--I I- U 1 O ~-+ I I- 2 1 W I ~ I I 1 I I r-I 1 r-1 "'I "'I N r-I r-I .--I I I 1 1 W I O 1 C7 I tl' O 1 J C I ~ 1 _ 1 O In 1 F I r-I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 H H O 47 rl M I 1 1 I I 1 J I O 1 Q I O O I ~ I O O I Z I (:Q 1 Z Q I Lf) I N ~--I I ti 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 N I I W I I 1 '-I 1 c0 ~--I N M .--I p1 N .-a O Q W 1 I 1 1 I a C.7 1 O 1 Q I O O 1 d' I O CO 1 •• W 1 O 1 ~ 1 ~ N I Q 1 O .--1 I H 1 .~ 1 1 1 d W 1 I I I ~ I 1 Z 1 1 r-1 .-I .--I ~ M 1.C) .--~ N LC') r-I N .--1 1 1 I ~ = I 1 ~ 1 O I _ 3 1 1 O 1 W 1 O I ~ 1 ~ (/] C7 Z 1 I I W Q I 1 U 4' I I +c. i--i W I 1 1 O ~ C7 I Q ~ W Q W I 3 ~ O V 1 J J = 1 ~ iUr N _ 1 I Q Q ~ O ti } J U Z w ~ O O ~ Z m W I i I C ~ U I to d~ N N N f ~ _ Q J to O O <") ~ ~ U H _ Z d F- ~ U a I I-r U W W ~ d W D Z ~ O' w d .. ~ Q C W d (n d O \ p >- Z Z z } Z I--I Z Z ~ N ~ Q Q Q Q Y~ Q ]C Q Y Q ~ Q D O D ~ Q D ~ Z O~ D Z N Z w W w Y W W W O w C,7 w Z V1 W S G/) In H N d 2 (n a N ~. Z N ~ ~ Q ~ Z O H F- } tY O W U ~ C' ~ > W > U W (/1 Q d W Q Z U w = Z H N Z _ O O ' ~ N h I i Q Z C.7 Q O O C ~ ~ O W U d W Q p U ~~ W Q J F J Q Z Q M W C7 Q W d c.7 •• W Q H d W O 2 3 i W I C7 i Z I ~ I W I U J E } O] tZ Q U 1- W f Q H F- Q Z H W 2 ~ C7 Z ~--i C.'J Z •-I N N Q N J W Q J H H O F- 2 O 2 O W O O lf7 .r O O O ON O .N-I N I O O ~ O N I O .-I I .r i I I I I I I ~--~ M N N ~ .-I .-+ ti N N .--I i ~--~ M N .-1 r-I N lL7 .--1 N O .--i N M ~ N N .-~ .--1 I i 1 I I I I r-1 .-~ r-I N ~ V .-1 r-I .--~ N M .-I N ~--I .-~ M N M N 00 rl M .--1 N ti ~--I I O 1 N O i W O I .U-~ O I r-I 1 ~. ~ W I N I Z I Q w 1 I J I N N I W = H Z Q I ~ I W J I 7 U I W O N ~ Q C7 C H O Z N d Z Z O ~ ~ _ ~ Z O' H d N Z d d _ W a H I W Z O O O = f O W O N Z Y U Q N Z I Q Y m I Z Y 4 Q Z Q Q } I Z I- ~ Y Q ~ I Z U Y Q W Z U Q Z Q p U Z U O O Z Q U O w U Z p N .-~ O p Z I- E n d W N Z w Q to al O ~-+ W d (n } W H N _ W o w Q C O Q W> > W ' W Q Z W C7 N S d N ~ d ~ (n m Z a N N ~ ~ ? J C7 Z U = O O V1 Q In } Q I--i tl' ~ ~ Z V1 I- Z Q ~ ~ Z J Z N O Y 5 ~ r U m W O OO W . O N OC Q O U d Q U' a N J - J W J f J Q W C7 Q W d U' .. H d I W I D I Z I I = I _H I 3 W I C.7 1 Z 1 Q I ~ I W 1 C7 Q J F } 00 Q U C H Z f 2 Q H H Q Z H W 2 Z ~U-I Z H Z (n Q J W Q J H U O ~r F- 2 O ~ O W O O u7 r-I O O 00 O N .~ O I O O i O CO I O I N 1 O .~ I .--1 I I I I I 1 O I I O I O I O ~ 1 O 1 .--i 1 1 1 I f\ I ~ 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II I O c0 I c0 II I M I M II 1 1 II I 1 II I I I I II I I II I I N I 01 ~f f O O I d W I W J 1 J `.-i N 1 ~ ti ¢ W I ~ W ~ U I Z d W N U ~ W Z U Q ~ ~ ~ > a ~ ~ Z d d d d J I Z W Q = C.7 > ~ cn C Z cn Z I ~ I ~ 1 Z J ~ U D Z 1 ~ p O D _ ~% ¢ O W _ U W ~--I J U ~--~ Q U D Z Z d ! W ~ J U V7 H (n d d _ 2 d (n ~ W O U m Z U Q O F-- J 2 p. r-I H ~ Z O ~ Q a ~ rti ~ ~ ~ J ti W 0 Z ¢ O ~ O ~ O r - F- I- E U = O M .--I M N M "i ^~ N N N N M ~ ~ M ti N M 'r .--I N O N .-a '-I M O '-I N .--I M M N W C7 Q J f H O H 3 O .--I H O O Z W '" ,..~.~ ti W d O F- N J W J U_ 2 W J O W Q H O F- f 2 Q H Q W O V1 W ~ J W U m ~-n F 2 ~ W Z ~ C' W Q W Y ~ J W ~ ~ f W Q d Z O F- O Z O U W C7 Q U Q J ~ i ~ I W I J OO I O E I O ~ I d Z I I d' W 1 O J I H H I O 1 ~ 2 1 W I ~ I H 1 Z 1 W I ~ 1 H 1 d' 1 1 C 1 W I ~ I .-I '~ '-1 '-I N N O O ~!'1 I~ ~ O 00 O O N n~ c0 N ~--I .-1 ti ll'f .-I O CO O .-i O O N OJ N ~ ~ n O M O ^ N O N n M l0 ~ Lr7 .--I N O to CO N N n Lr7 O~ ~ ~ rl •--1 H N u'f CO OJ n O c0 cD ~ ~ Ol O M CO 1~ ~ N N .--I N N r-i .-~ N .--1 r-I N .--I .ti O O p c O O O ~ O oC ~ ~ ~ C 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O _ _ _ O O O O O O C7 d ~ ' Q Q 4 Q Q Q C.J U C.7 W (,7 W W W W W C.7 C7 L7 C7 C7 O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~"y O t!') ~ ~ t0 ~ cO LO LO t~ OO I~ ~ N N N O O O n O ~ N O M O ~ .--I t\ M n O O~ N 07 Lf) O ~ O N O O~ .~ O O~ M c0 1~ M c0 ~ M~~ .-i ~ O O t\ ^ tY CO ~ N ~ .--I O O O O~ O OO t\ O O M O t0 ~ M t[7 O I~ O M O M N ~ n t.f) ~ e--I N N M M O O 01 O~ 67 CO 1~ t\ L!7 M M N r-I ry ry ~ n O M ~ N N O N t17 r-I M ,_.,I ,,.y ~~ O O O O O ~-+ O O N O O O M O _ r-I r-I rl ~--1 .--I r-I r-I N Lf') e--I r--1 r-1 U U Q ~ ~ N 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N M N N N N O ~--f ~ (O CO LO U ~ ¢ ~~~ W ~~ O O W O O ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U ~ W ~ Z O ~ Z U Z W ~ ~- Z ¢ H ~ C' 0 O ~ _ ~ W Z N ~ O N ~~ ~ ~ 4 Q z Q z z z o z Z z Q ~ U Z o o Z W W ¢ o x¢¢¢ w N O W O J W 2 U O VJ fn Z O W H p p p t/1 O p 0 O W VI = W W W Z W W W U W O O~ ~~ X ~ _ O N to (n W Z d to N to I W~ W H D O Q ~ ' ' fn H- ~ C7 ¢ O f O F ' W~ W~ C7 O - d O~ 0 0 2 W Y S 2 2 D p W S 2 2 ~ H J J F- H H O w cn H H F- 0 J - 2 2 ~ 2 O J W W _ ~ O a~>> ~ N > Q O W U O U U tl O O O O O W to N - ~~ O f~ N~ f f O O C J f~ f > N O~ _ ~ CO (n N d Z . J O C O >- ~ >- J J J ~ O O M W O T ~ .-y 2 01 J ~ ~ = Z ~ O~ Z i O ~ 6i O O~ O~ ~ 0 -i 2 U f--I a C a O d a rl r O J O U ~ (n ,,._ r N W Q d Z H N J W J H 2 W W J H ~[f H W f Q H H Q i ~ W 1 N 1 O cn I W 1 2' J 1 W U I 00 ~-+ I ~ 2 1 ~ W 1 Z ~ 1 I 1 I K W Q I I M ct 01 I n O ~ M M CO O~ ~ ~ t\ LCI r\ N Ln M O N N ~ T lff O ~ Lf7 .--I Ol M .--i M cr ~ 00 01 ' ~ ~ ~ M .~ ~ Lf ) 01 M O ~L7 .-I O .--I ~ Lf7 ~t N ~ 00 lf1 Lf~ O M I~ tl7 ti O O M O O ~-+ M Op O Q W Y i Ln O O M W ~--I Q~ I~ .--I M .-i N cY N la7 ~ N ~ O N r-I 01 n CO ~ Ol O~ ~ J W C' I O O c0 1 N - M c0 ~--+ LC) ~ u'~ M 6~ ~ M .--I r~ O O O~ O~ N N N O O O O~ N OO (~ n ~l ~ W r I I V N N N N N M .--I N N M N N .--1 N N .-1 .--~ N N M M M M .-i .-i N N N N Q a I 1 1 Z 1 O I _ I O O O O~~~ C C C C~ C C K d' K a' C~ K~ 2' ~ ~ C C' C' p~ ~ C C F- I O O O _ _ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 1 O O O I C7 C7 C 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q O O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q Q Z . 1 G.7 d d d d d d d n, d d n, d d W w d d W W W W W w w C7 W W w W O I U I 1 I O O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I N N N M ct LA ~~~ M LC) ~~ M M~ 00 I M M E lCl M M N N N N M~ N N N N W 1 Q I I 1 I 1 1 I I CO 00 I~ O M ~--I O O ~ .--I I.[) CO 01 ~' O N t0 ~ N I~ O O O O N CO M1 N M 1~ 01 to 00 W I ct O Ql O ~ M M 00 M N I~ O CO ct M N M N ~ ~ I~ LC) .--I c0 ~ rl N ~ .r CO O 07 M I ~ O O ' O N N N M .-r O~ N ~ O~ .-1 ~ ~ .--I c0 M ~ I~ CO O W O lf7 N O) 00 c0 00 Ol CO ' W 1 .-i M O L[7 N O O Ol Ol CO ~ Lf) N CO In N 00 LO ~ rl O O O N t\ O ~ ~ J I N N .-1 M O O O O O O~ O~ 01 Ol Oi 00 00 00 I~ r\ n t~ t0 cD c0 t0 t0 c0 lff ~['f u'f ~ u7 lf'f _ ~ I I •--1 .--1 N ~-i r-I e-i 1 1 ~ 1 W J CO 1 1 O O 1 0 0 0 d Z I .--I ~--1 r-1 ~-i d' W I 1 1 1 1 I t0 t0 l0 M 0 U ~ ~ ~ O ~ O I--I ~ 2 I I W I ~ I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 H I I I I 1 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ¢ z Q Q Q z Q 4 Q z Q z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z I O Q ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ p Q O Q ~ 0 O O ~ ~ O ~ p W I Z 1 W ~ W W W ~ W W W ~ W ~ W W W W W W W W W fn W N h N W N h N W N W N N to In Ln Ln h Ln In ~ ~ 1 Q Q Q N N Z N Z Z N Z Z V1 Z Z Z Z Z H H H H Q H I- Q Q H Q Q F- Q Q 1- H F- H Q V- F- H H H 1 p ~ ~ ~ O Q W S W W W D 2 W W ~ ~ W d' ~ ~ W 2 D ~ W W W W ~ W W W W W ~ ~ J H 0 N N N a' J J J W H- J J W W J W W W J H W W J J J J W J J J J J h O~ 0 0 0 cn X 0 0 c/1 V1 O J c/1 cn O~ of <n O O O O cn O O O O O ; W ~ O ~ K a' O C d' C fn K O K d' d' K d' 1' C' K a' ~ C.7 ~ f 7 7~ O~>> O O~} O O~ f 0 O>> 7 7 0>>>>> 1 x S 2~ I ~ ~ ~ ~-+ o w} w w w~} w w~~ w~~~ w}~~ w w w w~ w w w w w W I = 0 0 ~ p 0 2 J S 2 2 0 J == 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 J O O 2 2 2 2 0 2 S 2 2 2 I O O O O U d U U U w d U U W W U U w W U d w W U U U U W U U U U U I ~ ~ f M C LL7 M N M M M ~ N M M ~ ct M 01 ct ~ M N Gt a' L!') L!') LA In ~ M ~ t f') LA Ln 1 >- } } of I J J J ~ , O of aO o0 op c0 ~ c0 c0 c0 00 c0 N c0 n N o0 c0 c0 N cD c0 W W N N 00 CO N N N d d d ~--I W 01 O Ol Ol O~ 07 O1 Ol 01 Ol Ol Ol 07 O~ 01 01 Ol 01 O 01 O~ O~ 01 Ol Ol O~ Ol 07 O~ Q1 h-i I r-1 r-i r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 •-i .-I r--1 rl r-1 r-I r-I N e-i rl ~--I N ~--1 r-I r-1 e-1 r-I .--I rl r-1 r-I r-1 e-1 ~-i Z I ~ M W C7 d C7 Z H (n J W J 2 W p W Q H p H W f U Q F- H I ~ w I o cn I w I C J I W U 1 m f--I I ~ 2 1 ~ W 1 Z ~ 1 I I I I ~ I r-I ~ r-I M ~ ct C' O N Ol ~ M M M ~' W Q I ~--1 t\ ct O N ~ tL'f 01 L17 M ct .--I CO t~ M U' V1 W 1 d- N W O 07 CO OJ In M ~L7 .-+ N 01 LL~ O Q W } I ~ J_ I I~ f\ Cp Ln ~ ~ M M M 01 I~ .--I O f\ O W 2' I N N N N N N N N N M rr '-I M N ~--i ~ ~ W I Q d I 1 1 Z I O_ 1 I K ~_ ~_ O p p p p p O p p p p p F- I O O O O O O O O O O O O I Q Q Q O O O O O O O O O O O O p I w w W C.3 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 Z 1 O 1 U I 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I N N N N N N N N N .--I N M r-~I e--i N I W 1 C7 I Q 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I r-I O r-1 Lf) ~ t\ n 01 ~ O~ OO O M M I~ W 1 N ~ CO O ~ Ct O I~ O M O ~ O n O Q I W~ Cfl O W n t\ '-I t\ ~I'7 N CO ~ <n O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w 1 ~ H M O ~ Ol i~ n cp pl ~ M O n O -I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' M M M M N N 1 ~ 1 I C' I J p] 1 O f 1 O ~ 1 d Z 1 I ~ W 1 O J 1 H U 1 O ~--~ 1 E 2 I W I ~ 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z I Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q F- I D p p p p p p p p p p p p p Z I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 V1 In N (n N N V'1 fn (n (n [n N N N ~ i H H F- F- I- H F- F- F- F- H 4 H H H- ~ I w w w w w w w w w w w p w w w Q I J J J J J J J J J J J W J J J rl I O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O W I K ~ S a' d' ~ K d' C Q' K 2' ~ d' p 1 > > > > > > > > > > > p > 1 W W W W W W W W W W W K W W W I 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 O 2 2 2 1 U U U U U U U U U U U W U U U 1 1 L17 LC') L<7 lfl LL7 LP LL7 L17 LL7 CO LL') C CO lO L[') I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 O 01 O O 01 Ql Ol 01 01 O~ 01 Ol 01 6~ 01 1 '-I N '--I ri r-1 rl r-1 r-I H .-a ~--1 N eN r-1 r-1 I M 01 ~ O O I.() N M N "'I p p ~ ~ O O N M ~ ~ ~O O r-I I~ C O ~ a' N M N N O N O1 N M I~ M V u'f M C .-a O n O ~--~ ~ X 0 0 0 .--I O O r-I '-I O O O O .--I O O O I 1 L(7 LL) L(~ LL7 LL7 L[) Ln Ln l() N N N N N N r-1 ~ ~ L[') R V CY ~ ~f V V V M M M ~--1 .--I 01 O W W ~~ O~ ~~ O~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ^ O ~ ~ p p p p p p p p p p p p p p D p O Z F- Q Q p w cn z H Q W O _Q ' ~.. Z Q H L7 p p p p ~ p p p J>>} C.7 p U ~--~ ~ Z p C <Y <Y K ~ <Y ~ C W W W ~ p ~ ~-r Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 ~ QJ U d ~ w w W W w w w W U U U U p w CO Z c0 ~~~ ~t C c7 ct V ~~ M M M ~--i ti T O ~ CO W ~ W p CO W 00 CO N OJ 00 00 O~ CO CO n Op ~_ O~ 01 O~ Ol Ol Ol 01 O~ Q1 01 01 01 01 O~ 01 07 O~ Ol N N ~--1 r-1 r-I N e--i N N r-1 H ti N ~--1 '-I r-I N r-I U f_~~ L~ O cn W ~ J w U C~ ~--I E S ~ W Z ~ W Q w ~ d' J W ~--i 2' ~ ~ W Q d Z O_ H D Z O U C7 Q C7 Q J f W J m O E O ~ d Z O N .-i I O N LA Lc') O M t0 Ct M ~ ~ M CO M ~--i O O M O O O I O ~ O O~ 00 O N ~ N O M I~ O M O .--I N c0 O O O I ~ ~ O n L!') N ~O Gf O N 01 M I~ O 01 1~ O u7 O O O I I M~ O M M O 01 Ql O ~ ~--I pp M N ~--I .-a ~ 0 0 0 0 1 e-1 r-1 r-1 '~ .--1 '"I r-1 ti .--1 r-I N r-1 rl ~--I .--1 r-1 .--~ I~ C 2' _C C p p p p K _C 2_ p p p O O p p 0 0 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O Q Q O O O O Q Q Q O O O O O O O O O I a a d W w C.7 C7 C7 C7 w w w C.7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 L7 C7 C7 1 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I . . I ~~ ~~~~ ~' ~~ O O O M M M M M M .~ .--i .--I I ~--I " ~--i O ~ M O et M d' O O ~ ~ to Ol M 07 CO O M Ln .~ CO LP1 M 1~ O .--I O t\ O N O N O Ql CO ~ CO C~ ~ f~ .--i O N O 01 Op O~ n O c0 ~ I~ M O O '-I O c0 O N c0 ~I7 N O W I~ .-~ O n N .--i t\ M .--I I~ LL7 I.n M ~-+ N r-1 O~ I~ n O O Ln M M M N O O ~ M M M M M e-i r-1 O~ O M ~ .--I M Ln O N I~ O W lC1 In lf') CO OO Op Cp ~Q O O O O r-I r-I ~--~ .--1 .N r-I .--1 .--I .--1 r-1 r-I r-I to N V1 N N N N to N M N N Q Q¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O M t0 O O f~ O N m °o mr~ ml.n .~. ~°o m o° v °v O t0 N N r\ N C LA ~ r-I r-I r-I ~--I r-1 ~-i r-I O 0 0 0 ~~ 0 0 0 O' O O O Q Q O O O C7 a a a w W C7 C7 C7 N O O O O O O O O O I~ O CO ~ n ~ O ~ N O O~ O r~ O O O O O O O O n O O O N O O .-'I n 00 O ~f1 O ~ LCf W C7 Q a Z_ H N J W J U_ 2 W D W J Q F- 0 H f U Q F- H Q ~ W O J H- U_ E 2 W ' ~ I H Z w K Q D N N~ O O O u'f ~ ct ti ti O~ ~n O~ t0 O ~n O N ct .-I ti M M O N .--I ~ d' ~ of ~ ~ ~ et La_ Lt_ w w W W w w Z O C.7 Q 3 2 Z Z W ~ p O Z Z h Z Q Z Q U O o¢ o¢¢ ¢¢ w~ z ¢ p w w I- ¢ W O W z z w o o rn U ' w ~ N O p W p O p fn W N W W J W W W Q Q V1 O Z w O w z z z z . -. z V 1 z w N V) fn O M !n to p p d¢ (n d (n ¢¢¢ Q d' W w 2~ p ~ O D O O ]~ d' w Q~ r, ~ a ~ O W d' W W D E W W 2 C7 D C.7 O p~ O p p O N In ~ W W Y W Y W W W W In W J W J W J J W S O K p C~ w C~~ O H (n ~ H C to to h N v> w w p O = (n O N O J O O t/7 d 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 O w p W W U w W w w C.3 L7 ~ O O U p U p O p p • ~ F- ~ ~ N~~ p>>~ 7 p O Z (ry O p }. ~ K p, d. C~ d. d. ~ Z W O w~ W W 5 5 2 ~--I M .--+ M M M ct ~~ to O O J O O W O W O O O O Q p O d w W f W F w W w w W 2 ~ U O S S S 2 O O Q W O W 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 U U U U w W 2 O~ 01 01 01 01 O~ 01 01 01 r'I N N rl N ~--~ N N --I > 01 Ol 00 ~f7 I.f'f ~ u7 I.Cf La7 O CO O 1' O ~--I Q~ 01 M .-I d' 01 I~ ~ ~ I~ !~ n ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t\ Z Qi 01 Ol 01 O~ O~ Ol O~ 01 O~ O 01 U 01 W 01 Ol 01 O 01 01 O 01 O .--a ~--I r-I ti .--I ~--I .~ .--I .-+ r-I .--I .-i O O .--I ~ ~ ~ .-a r-I .-i .--I ri r-I .-I U a l.~ -°.. W C7 Q d Z H N J W J U 2 W J H H Z 2 Q H H Q w o in w ~ J W U OO ~--i ~ 2 W Z ~ W Q Q W > C J W r-i ~ ~ ~ W Q d Z O_ H Z O U W C7 Q C7 Q J K W J m O E O d Z ~ W O J O ~ f 2 W H Z H Q CO N Ln O N c0 O O M l!7 O1 p7 O .-+ 00 M O N O M ~f7 CO 1~ O M O ~ O 01 I~ O .--~ ~ p M L[') Lf~ ~' ~ CO Lc') M O ~ ~ 1~ ~ O Q1 M ct ~ O CO M O N ~ CO cD ,--~ O n .~ ~--~ O n O ~--~ p CO ~ Ln M Gh .-+ N N O I~ LL') N O N ~ O L[') O~ O ~--~ CO ~' M 1~ O O ~ N O N M O 00 N O n M O n ~ N ~ N N a' ~ ~ M 00 •--I ~--~ •"a N .-a ~O M M N ~--~ .-i .--i .-i .-r Ln ti ~ ~--~ N N N "'~ 1 O ~_ D 2' Y O O O C O C ~_ ~~ p O O O C oC X 0 0 _2' O O ~_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O Q O Q Q O O O Q O Q Q Q O O O O O Q Q O O O Q O O Q O O O O O O O O ~+- C7 W C7 W W C.7 C7 C) W C7 W I..L W d U C3 C7 C7 W W d C,7 C7 W C7 C7 L~ C7 C7 C.•3 G.7 C.7 C.'3 (.J C7 O O O O O O u7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~--~ n O n M N N Ln 00 M 01 In M Op ~--i ~--, O t!') I~ N 00 O n O Ll'f N CO N~ 00 M N N ~t lD N .-i .--+ N 01 O ~ I~ N t0 d' M O ~ CQ O N 01 O ~ M 01 M O ~ I~ O n cD O M N 1~ M N ~~ ~' O N O O 6l .-r O n c0 ~ O OO r~ O I~ E N O c0 M A O O~ a' N M c0 O O N ~ M O M M 1~ O N ^ O ~ n N O O M N M N O p ~--~ ~ Ol O M O ~--~ 01 1~ ~ p ~ Ql CO t0 LI') In ~ ~~ p O~ O n O u'f N N ~--i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lf) V M M N ~--~ .--i 01 CO 1~ t0 lD Ln lf') Ln to a' CY ~ ~ M M M N N N N N N N N N N .~ ~--~ ~--, .-+ ~--i ~--i ~--~ .--~ ~--i ti M •--~ •--~ d' O V n M n O Ln n n O n M W ~ .--~ ~--~ ~ M O N L[') OJ N OO t0 N l['f O M CO O~ 07 M O ~ ~ O ~ V O M N d' N O O N ~--~ LL7 M M L!') ~--i N .--I M N O O N lf7 ~ M ~ Ln .--I M N ~ ~ ct ~ ~ ~ cY ~' a' ~ V M ct ~ ct ~ V ~ ~ ct ~ ~ ct ~ ~ ~ ct ~ ~ ~ cT a' ~ ct V V LL W W W LL W L.~ W W W W ~ 4. W L.L W L.~ W W W W LL L~ W W W L.~ W W W W W W 4. l.L 4. ~ Y O U H ~ U ~ ~ Q H W Z Z Z Z Y Q Q Q ~ to Q Y Q 0 0 0 ~ Y Z ~ J _U O ~ C cn N N~ K N K Q~ C a' C~ ~ 2' ~ d m 5 J a~ U Y W W w w ~ W W Z W Z W W 2 W w Y W O d W Q Y W Z U F- a H H H d a~~ a~ a a O Y Z Q a d to Z d Y U 0 Y O H Y U F- D O O W Z~ W W W~~ W W~ Wi ~ (,~ Z Q O~ F O Q f Z= D U Y W Z G' O W p C C' J Q= J J J O O J J O= O O¢ Q~ W== d' C O Q a' Q ~--~ U J Q W OC J Q a0 H O~ a O O O a a O O a Q C d 3 H (n a a m a F- H J d .-~ O H Q H O J D J~ O O~ J~ D C>> D W K Z d O C.7 O Y C D C.J C D J d' D~~ C F D~ d' O O = 0 0 2 2 2 0 Q 2 2 0 ~ Q Q W O O O Q Q O O Q O O Q O ~ 2 W d' O x Q W D U W I..L U U U W J U U W W J 2 '7 W O L.~ ~ J W p J W p J W (.~ U d C.7 W U J N O ""~ O „"~ lf7 off CO M O lff 07 M Lf) O ~ ~ N ~--~ ti O O O ~--~ O M ca O t0 c7 M L('f ct In ~ O O W n n n p 0~ W O O O n n ~ n W O ~ O n 0 n W O n 0 ~ W ~ O O O ~ O W O) O~ Ol 01 O~ O~ 01 01 O~ O~ 01 O~ Ol O) O~ 01 pi 01 O~ O~ O~ 01 O~ O~ O~ 01 O~ 01 01 O~ O~ 01 O~ O~ O~ 01 ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ .-i '-V N ~--~ ~--~ ~-i '-i .--~ N .--~ ~--~ e-1 ~--~ eN .--~ .-~ N ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ N ~--~ r-1 .--~ .-~ .--~ .--~ e-i ~--~ ~--~ .-~ e-I r-V ~ _~ O W c_7 Q a C7 Z_ F- N J W J U_ 2 W O W J Q H p H 2 H F- Q W O to W ~ J W U CI r-I ~ 2 O W Z ~ W Q W > d' J W 2 ~ ~ W Q d O H p O U C7 Q U Q J ~ I W I J CD I O ~ I O = I d Z I d' W I O J 1 F- U_ I E 2 I W I ~ I H Z W Fes- I C I Q I d I W I p I N O O I •'-I M I~ M c0 N O O O O I N c0 c0 O I~ ~ O O O O O M O N .r .--+ N I~ O~ 0 0 tf7 p~ O I O O~ ~ n c0 O O m O O Ln O O~ O M O O ~' ~ O I O N O off ~ N t0 ~ 00 N O M O r-I N 1 .H .-i I tl7 O ~ ct ~ t0 O Lf) M M I~ O lCl 1~ r-1 I I 1 .--1 ~--1 ~"I r'I r-I 1 I I I O O O O O O O p O O p p O O p p p O O p ~ I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ O O O O O O O O O I C.7 C7 C7 [, [, [, C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O O O O O O I I I CJ C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 W (,p C.7 C7 C7 U' f.7 C7 C7 C7 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I ct O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~--~ N 00 N N r-I I~ M I .--I O Ql M-1 O cT ~-i N N rl N .--I n M lf) lp t0 N N N .--I O ~ CO M l0 .--a N N N M O ~ ~ O O ~ ~ M Ol cY M M .-+ .--+ O ct ~ LA Ol O N I~ N .--I O O cr O N L!7 to ~ In ~--I N N .-I O Iii Iii Iii Lei Iii Iii Iii I.~~ ~ L~~. Iii W M O W O~ O~ .--I Op Op n M M~ p 0 0 O~ O O CO CO O H O O O OO M O O O O Lff N O I~ 0 0~ t0 ~ N N N~ O t0 O .-I .-I O ""I ~ O ~ N M ~--1 I~ N O Gt N O f~ M N .-+ .-I M N N ~--I .-I .--I .-I .-I Z d ~ d ~ ~ d Y W y y Z Z ~ m ~ U p U Q Q Y ' -I 3 ~ O O U d U 2 d C ~ C d' ~ O ~ a' W F- r -I N N d Z Z W W W W W Y Z F- F- d F- H Q d d J W W~ W W W p~~ I-y Z Q~ p ~~ ~ f ~ Z O p J J O J ~ J W O O ~ p p Q d' W W W p W W Z W W W _ ~ (n d d O~ d d H H to ~ ' ~ J J W J (/1 Q N J J J 1 C W >> 2> > p 3~ p J 3 C7 W Z p W w W W F- W C Z W tY ~~ C W' >> ~~ C:J ~ 0 0 O p 2~ C' Q p p 0>> p~ O p p 2 2 ¢ 2 Z 2 O W ¢ O Q W W a' ¢ O U U J U ~--~ U W Y J W ~ Y (n W 2 W 2 2 0 2 0 0 U U W O' O O O 2 2 O 2 0 0 0 ~ ~ U O W to W W W U U W U W W W ~O O lfl t0 n .--I ~n N N W CO N N CO I~ OO ~ ^ rN'f O ~ n 00 W c0 c0 I~ O n CO W .--~I Ct N .-~ .--I t0 Lt7 O r\ r\ 01 Q1 O 01 01 Ol Ol 01 Ol Ol 01 O~ Ol O~ O~ '~ .--1 r"I ~--I ~'"'I '~ '-i .-N N N N `~ ti ti ~-~ o0 a0 c0 N N oO J O~ O O~ O~ 01 Ol ~ 00 a0 CO a0 N N N CO 00 a0 U O~ O O~ ~ Ol 01 Ol 01 O O ` • ri ti ~--1 r-1 .-i N (/~ N eH r-1 r-1 .--1 N eH '-i r-I ~--i 7 W ~ / .a ~~ t\ W C7 Q d C7 Z H V7 J W J U_ x W W J Q F- W f-- Z F 2 H H Q W o <n w C' J W U m ~--i E 2 W Z ~ C W C7 to W Q W > C J W ~ ~ E W Q a Z O H Z O U W U' Q W C7 Q W J W J (y] O f O ~ a Z d' W I O J I H U I O ~-+ I F 2 I W I ~ I H Z W F H Q d ~ i n n O ~ ~ ~ N M r-I a--I O O C7 Lf1 N C O O d O N N O p1 O l0 O .-I O ~ .~-I O M 1~ O 01 N Lf) CO I~ N M O Lf) In ~ I~ CO O ~ O M C' M ~ O O O~ CO ~ O N ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ M M M M M N N t0 M CO lD I~ (D c{ !~ I~ 6p tD LA CO M Ln LA Ln Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M C' M M M M cY M M M M M M M M M M Q O U (n U N Z Q f ~ ~ ~ W O N Y W J Z U ~"' O Q N Z W d' ~ ~ H to U ~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~ W U W ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ w C ~ O ¢ ~ U U X U x o o f o o x o x f x o f o o E~ o 0 0 0 0 L G: ' W x 3 ~ W U ~ o x x o o x o I..L W (,7 W U G.7 U W C.J L~ W C 7 C7 W W U W W 7 W r x . C U U W W U I+- N O M ti W .y Ln In N N r-I ~p lD Lf) 1~ t\ F- U O ~ n n CD O O ~ O O O M ~ M 0 0 0 n~ n n n n n W O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 W X O~ O) U O W C.7 0 0 ~ n t\ W t\ O O~ 01 O~ 6~ Q~ Qi 01 6i Ol O~ O~ Ol Ol Ol O~ Ol O~ O~ 01 01 O~ O~ .ti -1 -I r r O~ O~ O~ O~ 01 N N N N N N N N N r-I ti 'r r-1 N N '-1 N N '-1 r-I r-I H N e-i N e-i N F- 01 N ~ O N cn W p w Q ~ ice, _ r --- O W O a C7 ti H N J W J U_ 2 W 7 W J Q H N H 2 U H H Q W O N W C' J W U OO ~--I ~ 2 ~ W Z ~ W Q Q W > C' J W tl' ~ f W Q a Z O_ H O O U O Q C7 Q J W J Cp O E O ~ d Z Q' W I O J I !-- U I O ~--~ I E 2 I w I ~ I H I Z I W 1 ~ i H 1 ~ 1 Q I d I W I p 1 M .-~ N ~ r-I I (D Gt ~--I ~ h h N cY N ~ CO O e--1 h ~ L1') h ~ O ~ M I p7 M M .-I cD .--~ p~ h O O W W N N O N O O ~ O N LA ~ ~ (O N N ' N I N h~ pl cp ~p O ~ ,__I h p~ .--I N CO M ~ N O rl h O I cr ti .--1 Q~ Lc ) M M L!') O ~ I W ~-I O~ l[7 O r-I O O~ N h I.f) 07 ct M N .~ rl rti M t0 tG I r-I rl r-1 r-1 r-I '-I r-1 rl ~--1 ~--I e-1 r-I ti r-I 1 I 1 00 N N .--I O~ r-1 '--I .-I r-I 1 I 1 I C d' C C C C C~ 2~ K C 2' C O p O p O p p D ~ ' ~ I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O _ C _ O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O Q 4 0 0 0 O O O O I d d d d 1 O Q O Q O Q d d d d d d d W W C.•3 U' C.7 U' C.7 C7 C7 1 I I U' W d W C.7 W 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O I CO O N h O 01 O O~ h O N h~ ct M M M M N N N N h O h N 00 h O ~ ~ .--I O Op O e-I 1~ N N M h M L17 O O O h l[') t0 M h Ql h ~ .--I h .-a M t!'f t0 ~ O .-I h p) O h O O O ll7 h M M p1 M M LL7 M CO u7 01 N h CO N N N L[') Ol N CO N N ct rl O ~ O~ ~ 00 O r1 .-I ~--I .y LL7 pp t0 h ~ .--I tp ~ O u") ~ h ~--I ~ ~p ~ t0 ~' M M t0 M N ~ "'a ~"~ H O O O ~ N h h lD l17 L[') M M M CO CO M .--1 OO ti M N ~--1 ti r-1 ti ti e-1 r-1 e-y ry .--I O N CO .--I Ol 01 M O N O u7 ~ c0 O N 01 rr ~' M L!') ~' ~p M .--I O N ~' C' CO CO ~ ct ~ ~ lc') ~ M to ~ N O cD CO t0 M M M d0 N ~0 00 OO 00 CO 00 O W W CO N CO CO OO CO N O OO 00 U U CO ~ N O r-I l0 .-r rl .-I .-i M ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U d' C' C C ' ' ' p h h h h . h C ~ 2 d d C d' d' d' d' 1' ~ d' ~ d' a' 1' ~ W W W W W Z O Z Z Z _ F- D O D U W W W G. d W V1 fn N ~ Y O C Y Z Y fn H H H U Q ~ U Z W W W ~--+ p ~ ~ ~ tl' K ~ C K a' K d d d C ~ C d' C' C ~ ~ d' C W W W W O p O ti 0 0 0 Z K d' K W to W ~ W W d Z W W W W W W W W W W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~ O ~ Y S Q Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U U U U U U U C 7 O W W W O F- 2 2 2 Z ~ ~ p U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q Q r-i i--i ~-r Q Q D . Z W W 0 U U U U D O ' W K W Q 4 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q d a d d d d a d d N ( 7 ~ d W W d d d d a d d d d a W . Z O (n W W W W W W W D D C.7 O p p p p p p p O p 0 I- 1- F- H C7 W CO F- C~ h O~ Z O J C7 C7 ~ ~ D ~ C' ~ C C C d' d' C C a' D D D _ W O~ Z Q to O m 01 Ol I-+ pl Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 2 2 2 O O O W .~ C Z ~--1 .ti .--I .-I C.7 r-I 1 ' W p W W W W W {„~ W W W W W 3 3 3 3 O p p ( 7 p O U W Z , Z W W O O~ W C7 Q d .Z-i H N J W J U_ 2 W J F- 0 H f U Q H H Q W O to W CC J W U Ott I--i E 2 ~ W Z W C7 fn W Q W >- ~ ~ W Q CL O I- D O U W C7 Q U Q J F ~ I W I J m I O f I O ~ I CL Z 1 1 CC W I ~ U 1 O .-I I ~ 2 I W I ~ 1 H 1 Z 1 W I f I H 1 ~ 1 Q 1 d 1 W 1 O I ~ N N 1~ N I ~ ~~ O 1 ^ ti O O ~ m ^ ~ M M M ct ~ to O ' ' t0 O 01 M O Q1 l0 I~ O O ~ I ~ t\ I . . . ~ W O N O O C L! ) M O .--I O CO O .~ N n N .-r M Ct N~ O O n O N t\ cf O ~ O 01 OO N ll7 O .--I I CO CO O O 1 eH N .--~ O O .--I N n -I M I~ N M N M O .--I Qi ll7 Ln OO O O~~ O d' I I . N ~--~ N N .--I .--I N N .--I r-1 r1 r-I .--I .--I 'y 'y 'y 1 I 1 t 1 ~ CC ~ O O D O d' D ~ O O D !] O O O CL' CC O_' ~ d' CC d' d' CL' D O O Q~ O p ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O I CL CL W I I I c a U' C.) G7 C7 C7 U' C'3 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q W W d W W a W W W (,} I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O N O~ 1~ N ti N .--I Op M n ~' M~~ M .-I .--I N N N O O O O O O Cn .-~ '-I r-I .-~ r-i .-1 .--I to O ~--I M O ~ O M ~ CT C' O .--I ~ W CO N cb Cp 01 l0 I~ .--I .0-1 O ti ti O O O CD M M O N .-+ O N n ~ u"f O CH ~ N 'r l0 O ~ t0 O .-a ~ c0 .-I Op n .r O O p O OO O C7i CO tD O .--I ~D CT CO N Lf] '-1 ~p i~ t\ O .--1 ~--I N ~ N O n N C7~ ~[] C7~ I~ t0 lff ~ M ~ ~ c+M') OOi O O O p N O N t\ CO OO O O V ~ M N N r-I .--1 N eH .--I H ~--I '-I r-I O V N L[') M0.7 ~ O M Lc') Ol O 1~ CO '-+ O O l0 r\ Ol ~t ~ a' O CO M ~~~~ O O '-I O O .-~ O ~ L!7 Ll7 u'f 1~ O M N N N n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rl '-~I ,--I N .-i .--i .y ,--a .--I I O T C7l C71 G7~ O O CA O~ O~ m CG m CC CO O] C7 C7 C7 2 C.7 C7 C7 C7 U' C.•3 ~~ ~ ~ 0 p 0 ~ ~ Q m CO m m m CO m m m m N W W U U ~ ~ ~ W Z N N CL CL Z p Z O O W (.7 Q Y Y Y Y d N Z ~ .U-n ~ O 0 Z ~ C.7 CL W Z iU-. ~ p to H Z_ O p (n CL CL N ~ CC K CC CC ~ CL CL O CL Q Y W W O O Q o-Ur = I-- ~- ~~ Z~ I- W W W W = O Y O CL ~ d d ~ ~ W J Z Q Y Y Y Y CL Y Y ~ Y W W W d ~ ~j ~ IV W CL CO J J J J ~ W W U U U U ~ U_ U U Y cs ca co ~ ~ N s~ ~~ ¢ °~ w c a a a o a a~ a ~~''. O O O f tw ~ 2 Z p CW'3 O_ D D>> O>> > ~ O p 0 0 0 0 0 CW'3 0~ O O O C.7 Q U Q CL' D GC ~ w W CL' W W 7- W CC CC 5 Q' !Y CL' CC O CL' U ~ W ~ O^ U O Op F- O O x 2 0=_ ~= p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ CO C1l e--1 CO U W W U U W I~ r\ ~~ Z p U U Z U Z W W W W W W W Q W (,~ O Cif O Cif W O O .-. O lff Y .--I ct I.ff ~ ct te'1 n U O Q O O O Cp CA CO OD 01 O QI .--I .--I .-I '-I Z .--I .--I Z N N H OO 00 O OO OO O 00 • CO to n n 1~ n tD n t~ n W Z O O N O O O~ O O Cn O •- 01 Y O~ Ol Cif O CA O 01 O~ Obi C71 ~ Q .-1 .-~ Z .--1 .ti r-1 N .ti e--1 r-I V1 .-I CC N .--I N r-I .-~ r-I N r--1 '-I H J p ~ Q d U Q ~ O W C7 d C7 Z H N J W J IUr S W J Q H W 1C) H Z W f U Q F- f- Q W 1 I I N 1 .--I •--I N r-I ~--I M O N'1 1 W 1 d' J 1 W U I m I---I 1 f 2 I W I Z ~ I 1 1 1 ~ W Q 1 I r~ r-1 O r\ N O O M~ N LO ~ M O N ~ ~ I ~ Ln l0 I~ r-I ~ I~ N CO O~ CO M L[') N O~ M X19 Q~ .--I O Q W Y 1 M~ ~O M O N 1~ O N lp n t() M CO O n M N N ~ N N .-1 d' J 1 ti n pp ^ O 00 t\ Ol M N I~ Q O M ~ ~ W 1 t\ O O Q d 1 1 Z 1 1 O 1 _ I ~ D O K C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ' H 1 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D O d C O O ~ D tY C tY ~ I Q O O Q Q Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z 1 W C.7 C'.3 W W W C7 C3 C3 C7 C7 C7 C7 C> d d O O Q O Q O 1 1 d C7 W d W U I I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 I O Ln M In O O N M N N N .~ --1 y ~ O ~ O N O O O ^ ' 1 rl ~--1 ~--1 ti ti 1 N , ry ,. .-ti ^ ~ .-~ ~--I W 1 C7 1 Q I 1 1 I 1 1 I I N W O O M~ In O p~~ ~p M W I I~ O CO u7 N O I.C) O M O n M O O M M O LCf ~ O Q E N O c0 .--I p~ u'7 O u'f M A N M O O O N W I I M ~ N O O Ln to n CS7 Ln Ln ,~ O O ' O~ ~ -~ 1 r-I r-I ti O O M N N N .--I .-y O "'1 M O M p1 ~ N O N ~ 1 .-I .--I r-I ti .-.a I ' ~ 01 ~--I OO . -I O .--I N I ~ I I J m O ~ 1 I O= 1 M cr ~ M Ln 01 M O r\ N d' O d Z I N ~'f off I.f1 N N M M M M 1~ p 1 p M ~ ' ~ N C O d' W 01 07 01 01 07 Ol 01 61 ~ 01 Ol Ol 1 C 9 C7 C 9 1~ n ~ t\ ~ M n ~ ~ ~„~ O J . . C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 1 m m m m OC ~ ~ tl' ~ n C' n t\ n ' F- U O "'I m m m m m m m m 1 1 d d d d d d G ~ ~ d d a E x I w 1 ~ 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 d 1 H 1 Y Y Y Y W 1 O O O Z ~--I d f 1 O 2 d ~ H K 1 a~ 2~~~ ~ ~ O f- Y W Y ' ~ Q 1 O W W W 1 Y Y Y ~ H d IU-I Z Z d Y 1 d a~~ Q Y 1 U U U I--I J H d Q Z j U U~~ Q Y , -I Y N~ ~ U U W a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ W N U H I--I rn N > O ~ O 0~ 1 a 1 .--i ~ D W p Cn M- J W W ~ ' ~ a \ y ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ' C 3 D o -I C7 w \ C3 . U-a I 2 C C OC d' 2' U 2' U U ~ ~ ~" O W ~ U O O Z I O O O O O O E O E E O O t -i w ~ Q W U O C7 Q O I--I I -I 1 W W W W W W C.7 W C7 C7 W W Z N d' J 1 I O M ~ M CO O O In O O t0 n 1~ O n O C O ~ ~ Q CO d e-i r-I O I I~ n n n n ~ ~ CIO ~ ~ N CO ~ Ol Ol N O 01 O~ U 01 ~ O~ O~ O~ I O~ O~ O~ O T ~ O Ol ~ O Ol 01 1 - O I -I W = ,--I ,-.1 Z ry W ~--1 W H .-i ~--1 r 1 e-i '-I e-i ~--1 ~--1 e--1 .--1 .-I r-1 e-1 H V J O to N r- " W C7 Q a C7 H F- fn J W J U_ 2 W D W Q H p F- F U Q H H Q W O to W tY J W U C1] tr f 2 ~ W Z ~ W C7 (n W Q W > K J W K 7 f W Q d Z O H D O U W C7 Q C7 Q C W J [O O ~ O ~ d Z 1' W I O J I ~ U 1 O ~-. I f 2 I W I ~ 1 H 1 Z I W 1 Q 1 d I W 1 O I Lf i N N ~ e,y ~ ~ O ""I I~ O1 O 01 N tf') N N O M ~ ~ O O M .-a M ~? N O c0 ~ O ~L7 O~ M O O O .--I O i ~ O t0 M Ql ~ lf') M N CO .--I l0 t0 LL7 O ~D CO ~--i O~ 01 N O M Ln ~t O O O M 1~ t\ M C O p p p OC O O D p O p ~ D O p p p ~ a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C7 C7 C7 C7 W (,7 C7 U' O O C 7 C7 C7 C7 O C7 O O O O C7 C7 C7 C7 . ~ O O O O O O O O .~ O O O O O O O O O N n M M M .--I I~ LL7 n O ~ M N .-I N M N N .-I n O O n .-r O N O ~ In O N ~ .--I .-~ ~O N M ~ O ~--I ~ c0 1~ f\ ch ~' Lf1 lt7 01 O~ O ~ O O .--I I~ l0 t\ O ~ ~ ~ "'I O M M .O-I .r O '-I ~ O O~ u'f 0 O .-I O O O~~ M ~--1 ~ M M n ll'1 ~ M e-1 f~ '--I ti r-I ry ~ 1~ n t\ n n M M N N ~ ~' K K K d' Lf) lff J J ~ d d d a 1 1 I.[) LC1 ~O N M O N O O O .-+ ~ N N N N Y E ~ Z ~ W H W U Z W U Z ~ C7 d d ~ -. p 3 > > ~ = Z Z Z cn ¢ 3 O d ~ ~ Q ~ Q Q Q W F-- Z O Z ¢ ~ to Y h U D D D W N H N O I O aY ~ ~ Z Z Z Q Q F U ~ <") i--.i Z V1 In In J = !n H d H W - J Q p p W i F- !Z d H ~ O d ~ Z ~ Z N Q Q =' N o -~ W p W W W C H U U C3 >> U O~ 7 ._I J\ O ti m ~ ~' t O d W W U ~ J Q' Q O O D W W ~ ~' O W d' ' .--I O ~""~ C7 ~ O~ Q U O ¢ W 0 0 4 U U } ~ U' ~ . H H~ H H Z G9 I 0 0 0 2 N W W 2 J p W to O 2 Z W\ W W O J W O J p W W („) ~~ 2 r„I CO ~„~ ~~~^ Z CO N CD CO N to U tl W D U M J J U O 0 0 ~ O C D O O ~['f tp ~O n O 0 '~ H Ol _ .--1 _ Ol Ol Ol O~ 01 ~ r--1 r-1 ,-i -1 N J .-I M tY .--I CO ~ W ~' ~' J ~ C7 ~l ~ 2 lC d O O O O 01 01 O tT O r p .Q-~ O O Q 00 00 Q w p w w S N ~ .--I .--I .--I '-I Q O O ~ U ~ m O ~ 2 O 2 S H O~ O . ~ O m ti .--I U D U U O .--I H (n J Q } ~ ~4 • ~ 1 ' ~N-1 W C7 d C7 `Z-I F- N J W J H S W p J H H Z f x U Q H H Q I I ~ 1 I I N 1 W 1 I 1 N 1 I M 1 O V1 W 1 1 I I 1 1 ~ J 1 1 1 W U m I--~ I I 1 1 I I F 2 1 1 I 1 1 Z ~ 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 ~ ~ N M W Q 1 C7 fn W I .y ~ ~ r..l C J Y 1 .--I M N I~ W d' ~ ~ W 1 N r-1 r-1 I Q d I I 1 O I i p C C p H p I O ¢ Q O 1 d W W ( } Z , I O 1 U I 1 I O O O O I 1 01 01 01 N W I I C7 1 Q 1 1 I I 1 I I I W 1 N M r-I CO (p ~ '-I (Q C.9 I M M t\ N Q 1 W I O .-~ ti ~ J I O N ~--I ti 1 ~ 1 N .--I r-I I C I J m 1 O f 1 O ~ 1 d Z 1 ~ M ti N I O O O O ~ W O U ~ U U U U ~ O ~-+ 1 ~ 2 1 W I ~ 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I J I 1 ~ I O 1 ~ 1 ~ DO Z I Z W I ~ 1 p N H 1 W d p 2' 1 N = Z Y I Y O U ~ d I S U C.3 ~ W W 1 •- r-I Q C p ~ ~ d 3 F- J 1 I S D C p ~- K W ~ C I ~ O w 0 Z '"7 W W 1 1 O ~ ~ ~ G.'3 1 n n n tp I 01 01 01 01 N ~--1 ~--I ~--1 i M N M .--I r-1 M N O X 0 0 I~ ~' ' Lf) .-~ ^ t\ O •--I In N 00 O ~ ~ Gt rl '"'1 "'I -~ O ~ M O B S .~ ~ O~ M N N 1~ M .--+ O • O O M LA O ~ N d' .--I O M~ O n O t\ N W cC ~"~ O O M N Ct O~ ~ n ~ cY M cY O~ 00 O) .-I ti ~--~ ti N .--I r-I .--I r-I r-I N ~--I .~ .--1 r-I p p p C p ~ p p C K K ~ K C O p p p 0 O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U C.7 l ~ C7 a C7 t7 O O O¢ O Q O O O O O d a d W W a t7 C7 C7 C7 C7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N .-I M N O~ N .-1 OO ~ ~ a' ~ ct N N N .--I .--I c0 ~ O O CO N N I~ ~ O ~ .--I 00 O O O 00 ~ .--I M M~ O N CO O .--I O Ol O~ O~ O N N .~ Gt Lf7 t0 .~ O O O O W O 0p I~ .--I M O .-I V' CO 1~ ~ t0 ~O N "'1 N O O n ~ tf7 ct O~ t0 CO M 07 00 1~ O ti M N N ~-I ~--I r-I I~ n O lt7 Ln t(') ~' M M '-1 rl M ~ O t0 CO c0 O ~ lA N ct 1~ O ~ n M O L!') CO CO M N N N N ~ ~ N O ^ O ~ 01 O n ^ ^ O O W W W f\ t\ N CO n n t\ ^ t\ t\ t\ ^ n n n O O O O = O O O O O > > > > O a a a d a ~ O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z ~ W U ~"I U ~ U U U O I--1 r-I r-I U C d tl w Y a a Z ~ a tl tl d d ~~ ~ ~ ~ V1 O d' = Q H Z Y U H Y~ F- H F- Y Y ~- Z~ W p W O U W J Z d Y W M U_ .--I W W W Y Y U U U C7 ~~ W O A S i-r cn O Z~ 1 . p Li d W O O O J~~~ V- U U H d C Q p~ W p a d' 1' C' C G d H Q d' U d' U C' W ~ p 0 0» 7 Z U U w C' ~ C W W W V U C 2' W m ~ ¢ d O O U ~ 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2~ f C.7 C7 U W W W U U U C 7 C7 O O 2 W (n (/) O ~ . W U r ~ 01 c0 f~ O M ct ~ ~ ~ O O ~ n (~ ~ n t° Z Cp CO rn rn ~ K ~ ~ w rn rn rY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o o ~ ~ rn .-I ,~ .y w rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn .--I r-I ,-~ r-I .-i r-I .-I .--I ,--I --I ...I ~ ~ O O J 3 , , 4 F- , , G ~ ~. f M N W C7 d Z H N_ J W J r-I 2 W D W J H D H W E Q H F- Q I 1 M 1 M ~ ~ 1 ~ I w I '--I 1 ~ 1 O N I 1 1 W 1 I I C' J W U 1 I I 1 1 I p] rr I 1 1 f 2 1 1 1 ~ W I I I Z ~ 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 W ¢ i M OO .--I 1~ .--I W N M M N .--1 Lf') GY W N .--I t0 M 1~ N N O O n r-1 O 01 O~ .-1 M d' L!') N N l0 OD ~ -I O .-I 1~ r\ W } i r t\ E N O M n LO M .-i Ol ~' N t\ O .--I d' J W a' 1 I ~ N --I p> 1~ ~ M O O~ .ti M .-a 00 ~O .--I O N M ~-I Ol ~ ~ W . 1 r-I '-I N r-I r-I M r-I r-I r-I r-I r-1 Q d I I 1 Z I O ~ 1 C D D I C 2' 2 C D D C p p p p C p ~ O p p _ O O I _ O O O O O O O O O _ O O O D Q O O O O Q Q O O Q O O O O Q O Q O O O Z I L~ C7 C7 1 d d w L~ C.7 C7 w G.7 C7 C7 C7 L.L C7 L.L C7 C7 U' O I U I I I O O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 cY M '-+ O~ 01 M ~ N N M 61 .--I '-1 ri 1~ rr ~ .-1 rl ti 1 ~ W I C7 I Q 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 W I ' Q1 N N N M N ~' O ~ .~ 00 M n lI') 01 ~ O N 00 t\ 01 O N ~ N 01 I~ lP) N N L[') ~ ^ e-y i~ f\ Q 1 N O .-r .-a N N Ol l0 l0 M .~ ~ cY O n Op .--I J I n M M O cY O ~ O Ol M M D ~ c O _ ~ -1 ~ I~ CO N L!') ~' M M M M .--I ~ M r-I r-I ~ 1 1 ~ 1 J p] 1 O f 1 O ~ I d Z 1 N 01 r+ N r-I O N ~--I M CO O~ W ~ O~ O N n .-+ ~ c0 O ~. w ~ ^~ N OJ O W O O 01 ~ N O N O N n ^ O ti N N O n O tD CO ~~ == O t\ n I~ ~ n n ~ n~ n ~ O O 7 O O n~ ~~ n n n ^ n O .-+ i 1 O O O O O O O O O O = O > > > O O E 2 I w I ~ 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 Q. a I ~ 1 Y Y ~ Y ~ ~ O J H I U U Y U Y Y Y N O Z Y Q Z W 1 . . ~ O ~ ~ U I ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O I d H d d d d' 2' l[') ~ F- h- ~ I O H S Q Y Z d H J U a F- H d' d U I- Q Z O H w F- 1 I Z f f Q Y Y Y C'~ Z U U U Q 1 Z Y W Q I O J d' Z ~ W W Q' f r.~ W ~ Q Y W H Z Q O J J O d J ~-- Q ¢ ~ ' ' ¢ O O O N a 1 O ' 7 J W Q z p 0 0 D O~ O '~ U W Q 2 '7 > ~ C' d' d' > F- F H N W O I H 11 d W I Q ~ C7 W K G' N W d' H w d d' F- W W I- d W W I ~ U w p I D~~ D C.7 ~ C7 A D D z C w w U~ p w U p U w a' a' D C.7 C7 2' p p U C7 2 d d U p f E f I- w E = O c.7 U p O S S g 0 0 2 ~ 0 ~ = 0 0 g w U U c 7 w p O O O F ~ O > _ i p . U c.7 ~ C7 U w w ~ w p p c.7 C'7 p O p p I 1 Cf L(') f~ 1 G' 00 Op OJ ~ O Q1 N ~ c0 N N 01 r\ n r\ ~--I I~ OJ CO CO CO CO 1~ CO OO W O OO ~ t\ n n d' M M O O O' H 1 W 01 01 01 1 3 -1 --1 W O1 01 O~ 01 O~ 01 O~ 01 01 01 O~ Ql Ol n W CO OO ~ Ol O~ Q1 Ol 00 CO OO 00 OO ~ Q~ Ol O~ O~ Ol r ~ r-I 1 W 3 N .--I .--1 r-1 r-I N ~--I '-V e-1 r-1 r-I r-I .-1 w W eti r-r N ti r-I r-1 '-I N N I N N t/') N `--~ ITEM NUMBER l _ b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins Magisterial District. His term expired January 22, 1988. Four-year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton Magisterial District. His term expires April 27, 1988. 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• One-year term of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. Two-year terms of Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District; Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton District; and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District expired 3/22/88. One-year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring, expired 3/22/88. APPOINTMENTS TO THIS COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN POSTPONED UNTIL IT IS REACTIVATED. 3. Fifth Planning District Commission Three-year term of Citizen Representative Lee Eddy. Mr. Eddy's term expires June 30, 1988. 4. Industrial Development Authority This Committee is also inactive, but does have financial and legal obligations on behalf of the County. The attorney for the Industrial Development Authority recommends that new members be appointed or the old members reappointed even though it is not active at this time. ~~~- Four-year term of Charles R. Saul, Cave Spring Magisterial District. His term expired September 26, 1987. Mr. Saul has indicated his willingness to continue to serve in this capacity. 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year terms of Paul Bailey, Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and Roger Falls, Vinton Magisterial District. Their terms will expires June 30, 1988. Supervisor Nickens has nominated Roger Falls to another three- year term. Mr. Falls has agreed to serve and confirmation of the appointment is on the Consent Agenda. 6. Planning Commission Unexpired four-year term of J. R. Jones, Vinton Magisterial District. His term will expire on 12/30/90. Attached is a copy of Mr. Jones' letter of resignation. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~ ~ C~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To: Nickens Robers ~~-f BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMFINTS AND APPEALS ~~ A. COMPOSITION: To be ectmprised o~ Five (5 )'members; appointed by the Board of Supervisors. `Members may be reappointed, and terms should be staggered so that less than halt o~ the terms expire in any one year. The Board of Supervisors may appoint alternate members who may sit on the Board in the absence o~ any regular.iaembers, and shall have the dull power and authority of the regular member.. Board members shall be selected on the basis of their ability to render fair and competent decisions regarding application of the code, and shall to the extent possible, represent.dif~erent occupational or professional Fields: At least one member should be an experienced builder. At least one member should be a licensed professional engineer or architect.. _ B. DUTIES: Shall act on application For appeals•as•required by Section. 36-105 of the Code o~ Virginia; om it shall enter into an agreement with the governing body of another county or ,;?t municipality or with some other agency, or a State agency. ~" approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and'Community Development. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: The Board shall meet upon notice o~ the chairman or at stated periodic meetings iF warranted by the. volume o~ work.. The Board sha11 meet within ten working days of the Filing of an appeal. .Z COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCxL/YOUTfi AND FAMILX SERVICES ADVISORX'BOARD A. COMPOSITION . Board to consist of two members.~rom each magisterial .district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city served by a court service,un?.h maY appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. 8.. DUTIES . ~ Advises and cooperates with ~the..court upon all matters a>VFecting the working~oE this law and other laws relating to children their care and protection and t;:o.domestic relations; Consults and conFer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension oE' ;, ~~~~~'~.f the court service program; Encourage the members selected by the council to serve,on- the central advisory council to visit as oEtea as•the member. - conveniently can, institutions and•associhtions receiving children under this Law and to report to the court the conditions and surroundings of the children•received by or in charge of any such persons, institutions or associations. . The Council. should make themselves Familiar with the work '~ of the court. Makes an annual report~to the court and the participating governing bodies on the.work of the council. •...,. As the Youth and Family. Services Advisory Board: . Establish goals and priori ties For County-wide youth. services; assist in coordination•and planning for compzehensive .- youth services within the private sector. Serve in••an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency'Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs o:E youth every Five years and to assist in developing an annual •~ Delinquency Prevention Plan, Further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board oP Supervisors. Provide a public Forum where concerns .about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns o'E public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions Eor youth development and to support the development oP needed services both public and private Eor youth in the community. C , MGETZNG SCE{EDULG One a quarter, ttie third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place detecmined at meetings. . ~ -3 FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION Coi~iission to consist of five (5) representat"fives of Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who ' shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall'be three years. One of the members shall also serve on the Executive Committee. The Fifth.Planning District Commission represents participating local governments included in the geographic area delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is composed of 21 elected 'and citizen representatives of the ', participating jurisdictions. B. DUTIES The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient development of the physical, social and economic elements of the District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental subdivisions to plan for the future." The general management program category provides the . basic organization and management of.commission activities and routine administrative functions. Because general management supports the entire operation of the commission's work program, costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation Plan . C. MEETING SCHEDULE Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.) 145 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE P. O. BOX 2569 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24010 (703)343-4417 May 16, 1988 Ms, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O, Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Ms. Allen: ~-7 According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Lee B, Eddy, non-elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1988. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr, Eddy is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you. Yours truly, `~ Wayne G, Strickland Secretary to the Commission WGS/pdp cc: Mr. Lee B, Eddy Mr. Harry A. Walton, Jr. , 5PDC Chairman Alleghany County - Botetourt County -Craig County -Roanoke County City of Clifton Forge -City of Covington -City of Roanoke -City of Salem -Town of Vinton INDUS TRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . A- COMPOSITION: (Summarized from State Code 15. 1.1377) To~be composed of seven (7) directors, appointed by the Board.of Supervisors; for terms .of four (4) appointments to fill vacancies which shall beefor~thecunexpired ' terms. ,B• DUTIES: Has authority to sue or be sued and to .prosecute and defend at law'or in equity in any court havin subject matter and of the g jurisdiction of the seal; Contract and be contractedswith~pAcquire,uimproverandate maintain-and equip and furnish one or more authority facilities including all real and personal properties which the board of directors of the authority may deem necessary in connection therewith .and regardless of whether or not any such facilities shall then be in existence; To lease to others any or all of its facilities and to charge and collect rent therefore; To issue its bonds for-the purpose of carrying out any of its powers includi specifically any power conferred. ng To appoint an industrial advisory committee to advise the authority; To borrow money and to accept contributions and other financial assistance from the United States ofgAmerica and agencies or instrumentalities thereof, the Commonwealth or any political subdivision, agency or public instrumentality of the Commonwealth for or in aid of the construction, acquisition, ownership, maintenance or repair of the authority facilities. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Called meetings. ~` PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION A- COMPOSITION; (Resolution 85-151.N $e tPmber 10~ p . 1985) To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial district and one (1) member at large from the County. All memb~e•rs to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. their or.iginalatermsmseachlsuce sta eedingaterm shallepfortthreef(3) years, expiring on June 30th. B• DUTIES: The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke .County; the Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors .through the Director of Parks and Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in this resolution.. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors, and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters. The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies, programs, personnel, finances, and the need•for acquiring and disposing of lands and properties related to the total community recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for recreation. The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation purposes as follows: Make recommendations establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the County; (2) to set apart for use as recreation centers, water areas, or other~recreationdareas and strictures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures as may be necessary to the recreation allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptpanceabywthe1Countyeofuany grant, gift, bequest or donation, an offered or made available for recreationrsonal or real property judges to be of present or Purposes and which it possible future use or recreation. Any gift, bequest of money or other property, an of real or personal property so acquired shall be held~~byethee County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4) and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all buildings and structures necessary o.r useful to the Department Function, and will advise in regard to other recreation Facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or loaned to the unit. _.~ /Q / ~I ~~~\ Ma.y 14, 1988 (/(J_ Mr. Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke., Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Chairman Garrett: This letter is to inform you of my rest County Planning Commission. If it is theapleasure ofhtheoBoard, I would like this to be effective June 30, 1988. This resignation is related to my plans to pursue some other interests in my life, such as family, work, attending classes and travel. I have greatly enjoyed my association with visors, the Planning Commission and the excellenthcount~ of Super- staff. I hope I have made some small contributions to the greational strides that Roanoke County has made recently in the area of planning. I have always felt I could accomplish more with quiet and orderly diplomacy, while serving on this commission. I would like to see Roanoke County, the Town of Vinton, Roanoke City and the City of Salem continue working in cooperation to make this valley a great place to live, work and la cooperation we are defeatin our p y I feel without this locations throughout our con try bidding•forhthe things wenneedhto make this valley great. We have so much to offer when we all work together for this common goal. The opportunity to serve on the Roanoke County Planning Commission for 92 years has been a tremendous experience for me, one I will always appreciate. With best personal regards, ~l1L ~, uc~ ~ ~ J. R. Jones cc; Harry C. Nickens, Vinton member, Board of Supervisors Other members, Board of Supervisors Wayland H. Winstead, Chairman, Roanoke County Planning Commission Other members, Planning Commission Elmer Hodges, County Administrator John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Tim Cubala, Director of Development ~ i-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 24, 1988, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Acceptance of settlement offer with Roanoke Gas Company for destruction of backhoe 2. Confirmation of Committee appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Request for acceptance of Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Authorization to pay appraisal fee for Palmer Property. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. d ~" - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION N0.52488-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 24, 1988, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: ~--Aeeep~e~ee-ef-settlement-a€fe~-wi~~i-Rea~e3~e-bas Eempa~~*-few-elest~t~e~ie~-ef-l~ael~h.ee 2. Confirmation of Committee appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Request for acceptance of Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Authorization to pay appraisal fee for Palmer Property. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Community School 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. i On motion of Supervisor Johnson after the deletion of Item 1 and the addition of Item 5, seconded by Supervisor Robers and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: y~Q2~c~, ,~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/25/88 CC: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Raffle Permit File File ACTION # A-52488-9 ITEM NUMBER .L "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OP' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN`T'ER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: May 24, 1983 Acceptance of settlement offer Roanoke Gas Company - Destruction of backhoe COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: .fit ~~ BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On November 1, 1987, a Utility Department backhoe, which was installing a four-inch force sewer main for the Fort Lewis Fire Station, severed an unmarked gas main. The resulting fire com- pletely destroyed the backhoe. Fortunately, no personal injury resulted. Utility maintenance workers contacted "Miss Utility" Under- ground Location Service on October 29, 1987, and a representative of the gas company marked the gas lines in the area of this work. They failed to mark any gas lines within fifty (50) feet of the work and specifically failed to mark the line that was breached. The wholesale value of a 1984 Case backhoe, Model 680H is $35,503.00. An independent appraisal indicated the book value as of November 1987 was $43,473.00. Our insurance carrier paid the County $22,480.00 for the loss of this machine. The County sal- vaged the backhoe bucket and incurred rental expenses of $2,900.00 until the insurance proceeds permitted replacement. The County Attorney's office has been negotiating with the gas company's insurance carrier to reach an amicable settlement. On May 12, 1988, this office received a check and release in the amount of $14,923.00 for full and final settlement of this mat- ter. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Receipt of $14,923.00 to be credited to the Utility Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~~ Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to accept this settlement offer in the amount of $14,923.00 and to execute the release. Respectfully submitted, - ,, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Lee Garrett/Steven No Yes Abs Denied ( ) A. McGraw to approve Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig John Hubbard Diane Hyatt A-52488-8.a ITEM NUMBER ~.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Supervisor Robers has nominated Jon Walp to a four-year term. His term will expire April 27, 1992. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: Supervisor Johnson has nominated James Bryant to another three- year term. Supervisor McGraw has nominated Yvonne Willis and Kenneth Bowen to another three-year term. Supervisor Nickens has nominated Roger Falls to another three-year term. Their terms will expire June 30, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~G1~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------- --------------------------- ACTION --------------------------------- VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnso n/Richard Yes No Abs Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To• Nickens x Robers x cc: File Building Code Board of Adjustments & Appeals File Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission File ITEM NUMBER ~ ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Valley Developer, Inc. the developer of Kingston Court, Section 1, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept .10 miles of Chippenham Drive and .04 miles of Kettering Court. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Ph'llip Henry, .E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engin Bring County Administrator ~' Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~'~ NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of Chippenham Drive and & DEVELOPMENT Kettering 3ourt ~. ". AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHIPPENHAM DRIVE AND KETTERING COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court from its intersection with Pleasant Hill Drive Route 1548 to the intersection of Kettering Court for a distance of 0.10 miles, and Kettering Court intersection with Chippenham Drive to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of .04 miles, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Kingston Court, Section No. 1 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 6, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 13, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 4 . . ~y 3. That said road known as Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION 52488-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHIPPENHAM DRIVE AND KETTERING COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court from its intersection with Pleasant.Hill Drive Route 1548 to the intersection of Kettering Court for a distance of 0.10 miles, and Kettering Court intersection with Chippenham Drive to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of .04 miles, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Kingston Court, Section No. 1 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 6, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 13, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Chippenham Drive and Kettering Court and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Dev. & Inspections File 2 r i ACTION NUMBER A-52488-8.c ITEM NUMBER"T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Approval to pay appraisal fee for Palmer Property COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County is participating in the negotiations for an option on the Palmer property located on Route 618. Originally this property was to be used either either for extension of the present landfill or for the Explore Project. It was determined at a later date that the landfill would not be extended in the present location, and the River Foundation expressed a desire to purchase the property for the Explore Project. Part of this negotiating process required an independent appraisal of the property. At that time, Roanoke County agreed to handle the costs associated with the appraisal because it had not been determined who would be the ultimate user of the property. The appraisal has been completed and it is now necessary to pay the fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the appraisal fee of $4,250.00 be paid from the Board Contingency Fund. Roanoke County will then bill the River Foundation for reimbursement in July. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: ROb T,. ,TohnGC~n/Ri ~har~ W. Rob r~ V Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers OTE Yes No Abs X x x x x cc: File Paul Mahoney Diane Hyatt ,f' 4 March 28, 1988 SECOND NOTICE Mr. John D. Willey, A.S.A. Director of Real Estate Assessments County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 STATEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. .$4,250.00 Appriasal report prepared on land and improvements located on Route 618, Roanoke County, Virginia. Please remit to: John H. Lipscomb, MAI 3635 Manassas Drive, S. W. Suite B Roanoke, Virginia 24018 I appreciate the opportunity of providing this service; and if I can be of further assistance, please advise. Respectful y s bm' ted, ~,~, J ~n H. L~ c b, MAI ~~ ID #54-11 -1443 JHL:lu ITEM NUMBER A-52488-8.d AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS'T'RATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Raffle Permit for Community School ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Referred To Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Raffle File ROANO ~Oh , ~F' E ROANp~ O F 1. 70 ~. , A L Z ~ A a? COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 .. rasa a~ COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE rasa APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seg. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg, of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT BINGO GAMES Name of Organization C~~~1rn Un~~-~~i Sc ~~cc~ l Street Address_ ~,~`; ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~~~''~ ~L;(~ Mailing Address ~~~ ~ ~ t ~ I City, State, Zip Code ~~C~C~1~1~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ l Purpose and Type of Organization ~,(~ ~'r-~; '"~' ~ When was the organization founded? ~~-1 "I Roanoke County meeting place? 5~'~1~'c~~ Has organization been in xistence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Indicate Federal Identification Number #~ ~~ ~~ j~; ~~~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. C-c~~~"~~~~=~ 93~~Q ~ 3--~ Officers of the Organization: ~(~`~ ~~'' ~ ~~~ ~' C~'l~,(,(V'~,~fV1 ~Q(~_ ~1~~C_1~~~~~1~~~ ~~1,~ ~~~~ C~-~n.~ . ~ II ~~ ~ . _ ~ _ Pre ~I~ Address : ~'" r-- Ira~L%~~t~~4'~`t'~,~r~L' Address: ~~~1(. 1~~ ~4.~-'~~ ~C~_ l~~f'~'~C. 1,~~,~ ~-~~r~ l~}- ~ ,-~ ~ l,~ ~ Secretary:p~~[,cra ~-0~-~'~~~ Treasurer: C~~nn~~ ~~ ~jsc, Address : -`~ • ( .~~x `~ ~ ~- Address :_ ~j~~ ~~~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~a t ~U ~~~~ I -~ - 7~>v'~~~ ~--~ ~~.~ .~ Home Address ~~'~~ ~~ _ ;~~ ~~~~~~ ~ Phone ~~S _ ~ ~~ Bus . Phone .~~~~~ ~- ~C' A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. I-~~7~ll,t~~ ~ ~I~CZ~'~ `SCE ~> ~ ~~~i~lti,2~~~ ~f" `~c_:~~C=~,~ RAFFLES: Date of Drawing ~ j ' ~V Time of Drawin g BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the use of the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. c C~c~l c~ r ~~~~.~ ~,~c~i~ ~. ~ ~: C~ e . ~~ ~1 ~-~;', ~. ~f ~ ~~ 1 ~~ p~ ~~ ~~~(,`~ ~~C~ C~~ t a~, ~.SC c~- . BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organ' 'ng, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such recor are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords re fired to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of~ch calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? ~/ 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organizati n shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until suc report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?_~J 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be id to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annua inancial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is vali only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and or such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in mana ent, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? 12. Has your organi ation attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amou of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18,2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates-the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? f 14. Has your organization attached a comp a list of its member- ship to this application form? 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? 1 ,~ 1~;~,,~, ~~ ~-~,L 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from pro erty taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? ~ ~U'1_S ~;~({~q~ If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, l or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose f the organization. .c 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ~.-~ If yes,, name and ddress of Registered Agent: ~, ~ r 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? ~y'~ (If so, attach copy of registration.) --'°~ Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? ~~ (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. ~l G- Article Description ~~~-+~ k ~~~f - hof kau t ~-~~ ~~ ~ Tom, -f ~~ ~~ _~~~~~~- tl~.~ f~~ ~z Fair Market Value ~~h~l~~,~_ ~.~~.~2 ~cl ~tL2Gt _ _ 1 ~. Ili ~ ~~..~~ ~~,~%~ 1~~~ ~~y~' d -~ ~ ~-tk ~~~ ~'c~ ~ 1~~~~--_ ~--I .~~~~ ~~ ~~~,1~ c~'~~ ~1 ~~ C~~~k..~c C(,~~..E~ `~ CC- ..~ ~1~~- -- ~J,, ~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo the number of people in attendance on each date amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501-C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) is played, and the 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAREN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~'S ~ 1 ~C~t b1(Q z4 C.'~F' ~ . ~~~ .17. S CIL ~E'- ~ , ~c~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ Name Title Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of -~ 19 ~~ My commission expires: _ ~ J 1f.9 /r 19 ~J G" GZ~ otar Public PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: R. tdayne Compton, Commissioner of the Revenue P. 0. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of ,.,. -_ this calendar year. -~ ! Date T- CAmmissio er of the a enue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ~ ~' A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~/z I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide t he time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members i s not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercis e courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : l~`~L4` r('rl ~ ~~ W L. LL. ADDRESS: ~~~Q F~2 ~n111 C,rn,1 St ~o6~n~oK~ C.0 V ~~'`~ PHONE : 3g 7 ~ ~ ~Q PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.1 `~ ITEM NUMBER ~''°S /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - April 1988 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $2,446,680.64 Payroll: 04/01/88 $384,460.14 04/15/88 369,721.75 04/29/88 406,640.94 1,160,822.83 $3,607,503.47 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~~ n ~~, Diane D. Hya Director of Finance APPROVED: ~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Automated Refuse Collection System Update COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Automated service began February 8, 1988 with the use of a demonstrator vehicle. The county vehicle began collection April 18, 1988. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Automated Collection vs. Manual Collection Performance Comparison. AUTOMATED MANUAL SAVINGS/ADVANTAGE Average number of homes collected per day 840 585 +255 Employees required 1 3 - 2 Weekly labor costs $ 349 $ 907 -558 2. Savings generated, 5 positions were eliminated, and 2 trucks to be placed in surplus. 3. Service Levels Several backyard service residents are discontinuing premium and disability service and are rolling their carts to the curb because of the convenience of the cart. Brush/bulk collection has been expanded to twice a month for automated customers. Surveys were sent to each automated customer the week of May 2, 1988. Results of the survey were compiled the week of May 16, 1988 and are attached. 4. Expansion of Automation Service. Second county truck is in FY 1988-89 budget allocation. ,~ 't'he neighborhoods to be serviced by the second truck have been selected and planning is ongoing. The second truck is planned for route service of customers beginning early July 1988. Second phase will include a part of west county along with the expansion of the existing areas covered. This phase will add approximately 3,300 more residents to automated service this summer. The new areas are as follows: Sun Valley Area Vinton and Hampden Hills Mt. Vernon Heights Area Sugar Loaf Area North Beverly Heights STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Board consider further acceleration of program. SUBMITTED BY: y ,, G ., .....................m~.~,.. ~~it"" e Gardner W. Smith, Director Department of General Services APPROVED: c Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AUTOMATID REFUSE SYSTEM SURVEY RESULTS A survey of the residents using the new automated refuse system was recently conducted by the Solid Waste Division of General Services. Below are excerpts of comments received from the participating residents. STRONGLY APPROVE THE BEST/THANKS/SUPERIOR/GOOD CONCEPT-SYSTEM/GREAT/DELIGHTED/ FANTASTIC/EXCELLENT/SATISFIED/STRONGLY PREFER/VERY PLEASED/A BETTER SYSTEM COULDN'T HAPPEN TO GARBAGE/LOVE IT/SO CLEAN AND NEAT/HOPE WE KEEP IT/LIKE IT ALOT/GOOD JOB OVERALL/SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE LONG AGO/WOULD NOT WANT TO DO WITHOUT IT/I FEEL THAT ROANOKE COUNTY HAS MADE THE RIGEII' DECISION WITH AU'T'OMATED COLLEC- TION/KEEPS OUT ANIMALS/HURRY! MY IN-LAWS WANT IT TOO/DIDN'T LIKE THEM AT FIRST, BUT NOW DON'T TAKE IT AWAY/SAVES US MONEY IN PLASTIC BAGS/I WISH THAT OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT WOULD FIND 4~YS 7.'O SAVE MONEY AS WELL/AUTOMATED COLLECTION MOST PRACTICAL OF ALL METHODS-SIGNED A "SENIOR CITIZEN"/GREATEST THING SINCE "THE WHEEL"/GREAT BECAUSE OF APPEARANCE...I HAVE ALWAYS LOVED MY COUNTY...THIS MAKES IT BETTER/BEST THING CO[JNTY HAS DONE/KEEP UP THE FINE IMPROVII~!ENTS/KEEP UP TIC GOOD WORK...WE WISH MR. SMITH, ET AL, WERE RUNNING SOME OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICES/REFUSE DEPARTMENT DOES GOOD JOB!!!/IF THE SYSTEM SAVES MONEY, YOU MUST DO IT COUNTY- WIDE/WE LIKE IT ALOT BETTER...PLEASE DON'T TAKE IT AWAY!!! APPROVE HOLDS MORE GARBAGE/IRREGULARITY OF PICKUP A PROBLEM/LET PRIVATE ENTERPRISE DO IT..."GET OUT"/RESPONSIBILITY OF DAMAGED OR STOLEN CARTS?/PREFER GREEN/YARD TRIMMINGS A PROBLEM/FOR IT IF ECONOMICAL AND JOBS NOT LOST/REFLECTORS ON CARTS/RECYCLING EVEN BETTER...CAN THEY BE COMBINID?/EXPAND...LET EVERYONE HAVE TO PULL THOSE MONSTERS OUT/CAN LIGH'IWEIGHT...EVEN MOMS CAN PULL OUT!!! MARGINALLY APPROVE 80 YEARS OLD...WIDOW...CAN AWKWARD...MUST CARRY TRASH OUT ~ CAN WHICH STAYS AT CURB/PHYSICAL STORAGE OF CART IS PROBLEM/BLOWS OVER EASY/WITH SNOW...MANY PROBLEMS/WE THINK THE CARTS ARE SO BIG AND UGLY THAT HOMEOWNERS WANT CANS IN QUICKLY...NICE!/TROUBLE WITH SPOT FOR CAN NEAR STREET...TRAFFIC HAZARD/TOO TALL LIDS...TOO HEAVY FOR KIDS TO TAKE OUT TRASH/TAXES GO UP...NO BETTER SYSTEM. NOT AT ALL TOO MUCH TRASH IN STREET/PICKUP DELAYED BY DAY AT LEAST TWICE/VERY UNSIGHTLY/CANS TOO HEAVY/EYESORE ON STREETS/NO REGULARITY OF PICK- UP/WASTE OF TAX MONEY...NOT AS CONVENIENT/CANS ARE TRAFFIC HAZARD. GO BACK TO OLD SYSTEM/IMPOSSIBLE IN SNOW/CONTAINERS HIDEOUS...GREEN BETTER/DON' T WANT 'ICJ IASE JOBS . O `~ CO 6 ~ d ,~ ~ ~, RI e ~a .J~ ~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~1 I I ~] ^~'~ 1 w ti I ..- I r~ .1J rn ~ 4 '"' 4 ~ ~ 4 4~ 4~ i f ~~ f I * *I y~ i 1 n ~T ~ 1^- • w ~ ~ [®n I ~ r= 4~? ' .~ to a J ~ 4 ~ ~ ~n . ° r` ' AXJ ~ 1 4' ~ w '~ ~ I lJ l~ ..y fr! ^ t~J 1~ I 1 ~ 1 I I 47 -ci(fl ~ w •p 1 I I t qp ('~ i 47 ` a~ c~ .v I .Sp _.~ 1 P•• ~ ,rpm t j ~ ~ ~. ~ 4 I .-1 wV "' aU w _ ~j~ ~~ ~~ = w ~ ~ . ~+ r~ co w I I '~~ 4 ' ~ . i1J 47 '1 1~ ; 47 ~ fw~ i J ~ ~. 1 `~ fIf 4' •4 A 1~ ~ 4~ I I t ~ ~ I i 1 ~ ~ I'. CJ ~ w ~ ~ I $n ro ~ n .~o uR w .v ~ ~~ 4„ ...; I'~ ~i tv _ I ~ i { d ~ r~ $7 ~; ; ~ ~ f^~ 47 ~ t,T f,7 t71 .~ ~ I i {{~~~ O~ ~' 47 ~7~ .p ~-~ i M rte' r-~ ,,~, "' f~ 'tea' u7 ~ ~r do ~ i t~ Kr f7 J i is ~ ~~ ~ i ZI A A ~,... f^- 7. 47 ~ ~ ~ V I~ _ i ~ ~ ii n ~ I 1 I * y, ~ J f-~ y9j ~ 0~ ~ 47 O alJ ~! i.,, ~ 4~J a1~J ? ~O ~; t7 Yi .A iii .p I ~~ 47 -a1 ro w .yn r-~ o +mw:~m rr~m.si^i v:v lV `~ ~ f~ ~ 47 .0 .~ ~~ a a70 u~ r. ~T .A ~ tXi tt ~ N ~ t7 f f' q,l <J' M~ 47 -Q' 4 ~J tiO0 ~ ^+ .V w ..+ ` aV ~ 4 r~ iA ~ ~ ~ fiSJ f~+ ~1+ ~ n p~0 ~. f~l D ari W ~ N 'i ~.T.. ~ 4~ Cp la7 t`# t 47 ~..tl- .~ 4~C77 a~ r~ .A w c ^P 47 r", L ~y tV a~O~ 1~ i5J `p tIJ V .70 aA w w tt w~ w I w t~.i .., J _ 4 1 ~ M Sld 47 1~ aA of ~ ~ .,~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 r w M a~ .A .YO 4' 4 lT ..O ~ t~ i~J ~ ~ ~ -. lt~J r~ i uJ •n tt~ c ~ w ..{ ~ « r r~ I w i ~~ o~cr~ ~~~ ~~c~ i~ t1J 4 t1,J l'n W r~0 w i ~ .V w i i ~ l ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ' f ~ i I ~ "' W ~ w ! ~ ~' ~ ru'r~y w ~ l u ~ ; w ~ •'~ u`J ~ ~t, ~ ~ i ~ ~ ( ~ ~ I ~~ ~ "~x~W~ ~ ~~ w ~ ~ ~ ttf W tX 4c (~i1 47 t~ .~ ~ M t!~ ~ ~ F- ~ K 1y w W ~ -(r r~x -~C~ ~ µ y~.1 ~~~ ~cn.~, I':nwM ~w.x t~. cnf~wwcn~ ui W W !~- .-JU ~:. 4~ FF-- r~ t1~- iT) to iwi .~7~`pi] +°pS L~~C-~, ~1 tiT.' i7 fY~ I,.._ ~ 1,7 ~, ~ ~ o ~ iTi ~Y C7 4_ ~ ~ (x +S 4j fop r.,,] `f,.x ~ 1J~ ~O b O v ~ I ~ «J .. V ~ ~ ~ v I I * * y r" ~ ~ I 4 ~..i, w ~ 1 1 1 4' .,. .~ v ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~„a. o 47 47y7 ~ aL I I ~~l~ `~ mm ~ 7 p f N3 ~ y ~ a a 4~ w 1 t~ M v 47 I q9 a 1p 4~ m :~ ~ S~ f ~w~ j I' ~ ~ ~wyE~ ~~ r°s ~ ° I,'J. M ~ Q ~J I 44} ~ I ~ °w ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ; ~~~ w~ i ~`~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ i ~ ~ d ; `" 1 s~ v ~~ I w 1~ 1~ ~ /~ 1 a~ 1~ I YT 1 1~ ~ j i ~ ~ I) :! ~- II I 1~,~ u ~l ~' ~~ !f ~ i{ 1 ~ ~~ 1 ,Q ~~ I ~1 t p~ T I 1 r,tl j~ ;`iii I II I M'f ~~ ~; o ~~ I I II i' 1 ~ i '~l~!~ ~ 47 1 aA 1 ~ .~. I ~ ~ c, w ,fix, 3 f C ~t. _ Ci1t1~7T1' DF RDr1'~G4;E _ _. _ _.. __._ _ - j_ 2 ' _ STATEtAEtQT C1F EX~t~iT11RES ~ ~- i ! ~ a' TEN 1~1C3tJ`i i-35 EtditED r'U~RiL 30, 13$$ j .µ I____._ _ _ _ -!1E>1LTii d 5~fi;ir~L SEfNiCES DLtBi. iC 'tiEilLTti 3$7, ilib 3$7, i~lb IiKj ~ e'~ - _ SEsCif~-SERVICES-G1itt4Dt~CtSTRitTCtF~f - 1,7~l,i4i 1,3i4~5$1_-- 7$___.. . _ __ ----- __--___ -------.__ Rii~iC r1~i5T-'a}~'CE $2b, 4is6 X02, 50i1 b$ ~ "I it~iTiTUTiC~ff~ CARE 4$,000 17,3b7 3b ~ 9f --i_-- --~i;ic~Ei~aic~-t~t~tsiz~~i--- - _ --- ----- ---3a,~$a _--- ~4,~$4 -- -1~-------_ _ - ------ ---- ,o~ ' , ; DEVELt~t~Et~'t t2I -- --- 5l3PERItItENi1ENT-_D?•-ii~V:=LO~i+SEAiT --_ -- lli it57. -- . _.. __ _. __-- _-- , -- tab obi----_--- --- -- r ---7$___-- ----_-__ ___ ___ ___-.___.~. -._.--- ~ \H ,,' , 4 DL.~3Hit~ d 2C3Nitiv^ ~7S 73$ ~ : 202 474 75 $1 ~ ECOFiOIf IC itEVEt.t?Dt~tiT $9, b73 72, ~ ~ i _i 1' - - i~i~ELO~Ni-~IEViEtk------------- ------____.._---104,:~bi- _.$Z,2A9.------- -~ ---------------- lrj~ i31.~tt~titd6 Ci3PtMiSSiON i$, 2$1 13,0'33 7i 17 ' a ~ CONSTRUCTiC11d btiiLDitcG SbRViCES '" 2iKti,2$0 0 154,000 9~4 $2 . . _ -- _ - _ _Ei.ODD-Di SRs i~_EXR~----- -- ~ ---- ----- ------- -- - - _ - -~__'---_- ___ I ~ 191 ~~E~iri1 1 ~~~ 21 ---L-iBR;~RY- --_ ~ S084s511----- ~rsT~a ~ 22 EXi'ENSii3~3 d C~VTitdititdi EDttCRTiON rf,2i3 b4,irf b7 23 E)1f~Lii1~EE ifEtdEFiTS 7i4, .!+-'3 4$7, x'32 bi ? -_ -_-L't~TRlistffli~TO_SEfiViCl^Ctkt~tdiZAT iCtt~S------i'OsQOff 24s04ft ii~~~__ - - 2s ~19I~Lf.f3t~Ot35 `>=.,b, S2U b3, Ib$ 31 ~, X 28 - _ - - - 29 1 29 0 3O - ;ERR At'tD~SE~t~)f5-------- ---------- 31 ~i~tH#JRSftEQ.E EXPEt~iTURE~a ~ 11~ 1 32 1 3RRt~ifER ~5 i~$3 SERVICE 3,775,b93 2,35D,977 b2 33 __..T~ -E~~-~~t~t'~li ~.-3~c~a~~.E----- `~S~},!~b~---•-;{;~'i-Oci~ ~;' ------ 3a j TRRt~,EER TCt SCftC1i2_ O~fRRTitv'Ei E1ltdii ~i,4bb,000 1b, ~1,93'i b4 ; ~ .3s I ~ ~ 7RfER Tii 113itiT'r Ca~Pi7~L .'~,717 7,`~u4 3 dti -- - . -TRAt+l~ER_30 Cft~i7AL- isREtiECTS.__ _ _ _.______ _ S,U.~~432.___--2,3`~3f.l13_ - ~'° "fkr~tiarEit TO YGtiTN i-~1VEPf 1 D 72, 23~ 72, 239 kr ~ lilis 1{10 ! t~ TRRt~ER Tff 6kf~T FL . 39 --r-- - -F~F~&Cir'R3AiED-B-'tEi1Ni~_ __---- -- _ ---- ____1,4C3,.i~.._ ____----0--- --- -_ _i1~ - -------- - -- --- '__ - ~40, '~nf~ RESERVE FOR E+C>rk~v G'C~dTitd{,Et3C't :~?,T3 0 ------- ----- ----- ~4zi SfiYr'd.-_TEtfB'+iSFER_iTEt~ ___- --- ------------ --- '~ ---~'1 2~i i$$ ------34,if4,9s7 , , _.._....__..- -.-- -47~---------- 43i ___.._______ ~_`__~_ ~____ _~~__ ', 4 i44 1 Ins! - ---___- _ 5fdtt~dJ- TGTAL- __ --_.-__ . _._-~58,7b4,j04_~-.--4ft,e12,=,$0_ ___ -_ -b8-__-__.--__-.__-_ -__ ~n~~ I 1 ~ ~4L' ~O I r`.il.' fi 5 a~ 1i Jt~~ / `~, Fir~anriai State~ents: wage 3 Uf 3 . ,~. - __~._ _ ~~~;' i-_ ~.. ~--, _ _ _ _ C£stI{7Y C~ RCAi?~SnE _ ___ ,j ; ST~S7E~sESJT t~ E;1r'EsYDi'::L'kEfi ,g~~. v '~; TEk MCSYTha EtdLsED ESvki~ 3~ 19$$ 6'_'1 i 4 - - __ -__ ____ _ IA1UCiEi Ea~Eh?iEU ;; e ~ ! ____. _fir'I{EkRL..A~FiIiNiS~kf}73CIt{_._--------__ - - -------- ~ ..._ EliSRD {iF 5ilPtki)i8Ysn5 __ _ - -- --- 3 147, 245 •6 - 12i, ES9is $ ' { ~ {X31A~{7Y R~it{I5TkR3tsk 35E5,bJ{S IJJ,'3o7 $1 _-- ~j~ CCttB{3Y AiTGfd{fY iLb,4~;i itt4,6:i5 {~ ~ , ,, I ES3P~1I5Si Dt{Ek OE AEi+EiVLJE 44$, 7U4 331, 202 $7 ' - -- - - -T~tfRSi.€ftEk-._._ __------ - -- - -- - ---- X74 ° _ _ 4~:,S.r$---- . ------ $6 ~ , a ~ EiE£3i £t3$ 111, i~`'3 14i}, 4$7 ----___... 79 __. _. ~s ~ ~- SESf~EIi£E#TEt~{iAt iG5,14$ ---- - fif,7$$ S,j } `~ z ~ 2 2 U a Ei S£aL E~+dT ~iPERiNTE~lDENE 8t fifiCAt Mtr'~V+'~,Ef~Ni {Yf1 #1TV {9C~C'CCii} ~ i~Mf~tt r1C£DilJTitV6 } ~ RfsGCt3kEMENT ~ --r~r-v~-~~ir a' xliffi~# ; zI EtiSit MiNAGEI'EiJT - £I~fliT £DL~3 BfNERfb_ i}TSTRI£T LYURT ---ry~~7l~~~ ---`-`--~..-..~..._ 3 & D DISiki£'E £ULIR'f QEkft ifs £i~Ctiii £33Eik'E iLfl, 2$7 ~, OfiEs _ +L:~S $i}, b32 ~, 754 72 JAI, 4a5 2€s7, $fiU 7{, 2f3,033 I7f7,4$3 ~p $0$, s$is 777, 443 'j6 i2, 34fi _ 3ES 5,~ 2f --~bJ ~_. 5,515 [,$$fi 44 47{}, is8is 372, ~~ 79 ~1>'~EI~i tir'~i£E Vi t? ICI ill3t~S5 ~~v x'35 WPLi£ fiRfEiY .; PDti£it{G b iN'JESfI6RTi~dG r37; __.__ ___ _._ HifsI~FSY_5'REc~1~£E3tl~II5S3ESt{»___-.-- ~3~~~ ~i~ ~~~ ~~~ X39! ' ..... ---.-QIERGEI{C'l--fiEkViG~5-6-3i~IZ-Db1?-~S~'~{SE_._ ;40 CESI~it{EMENIlf~kf ESE' i;ki5tfi{EkS I4} 42 ~JiAt~ tI:tNERt3L 3, bn5, 39~ 3, f'i8, 964 7$ - - ---- ~5~--- _____._-_-.~S_____- -_____~4 1, fi71, b75 3, 33fi, 71is ~} 4fsfi, 58fi 359, 447 $$ _ 34,717 _ _ _ _ x$,224- _ _ --- -$1 f , 3 f 5, 3$4 f , 59J, 57(s {~ 141, ~2J I1 i, 2J'3 y j'j S+UBI.iC fACit333ES a4 4s~ SUPEkiNEENiiEIFE f3F DLibLi£ fr1£itITiEB II3,t53 ti7,3r13 r---- -- SEEiEEi-tIE~iTS--=---------------- ~ ~ ~7 ~ ENGi t~ERiNG RUiLDiN{~ b 6kCilN{itS `,43, iSlE} ~; , ~~ _ fi7 ~ar~ $5$,485 515, I12 71 r ~~; _ ~E~~s ~~71~ ---------- --- - - - _ ~~ 075_- f4~ $4L} .r ~~ ~: ~~~ I,4fi5,'r1$ I,S,.i~,Jffi 94 DU~I£ Tkf~t5E'ttf7Tf{'f IDf{ vS,Su'3 41, j78 {~ ~, _ _ _ _ #3kCft4tEt5-~SRifi~tEfiRrd£E--- -- --- -- -- _ _ _ -- -8fi5,fi~$---- - - 7~4,rj'~ _ ___ -- - - - -~ --- ----- - _ - --- -- 5;3 ` i 54 __.. _ I, ~.. _. . __. --- _ \57 ~..i_.._ _ __. ___ . _ _.__ . _____ _ .-- 2$4,.3fS5__ -..----233, i2j ~, 375 ~, itfi 7,$f0 2,4r f3 3f ;' ~, ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Space Needs for Roanoke County Governmental Office and Operations, Constitutional Offices, and Roanoke County School Administrative Offices and Operations COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND On July 14, 1987, a Blue Ribbon Commission was established by the Board of Supervisors to study all services offered by the County and identify methods to eliminate duplication and waste. The Commission issued six major findings, one of which was to consolidate all County facilities and to construct a central administration building. The Commission suggested that this facility be built on the 26-acre site adjoining the Northside Junior and Senior High Schools, immediately behind the new Public Safety Center. In receiving the Commission's report, the Board of Supervisors request that the staff respond with a general work program by May 24, 1988. The County Administrator, Superintendent of Schools, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services, Director of Facilities and Operations for Roanoke County Schools, and the Director of Planning and Zoning met in early May and established a general strategy for analyzing the problem of administrative and operational space requirements and for preparing recommended alternatives. The Director of Facilities and Operations and the Director of Planning and Zoning were designated as the primary project staff people. The Director of Planning and Zoning is the project coordinator. RECOMMENDED ACTION A comprehensive study of space needs for governmental and school operations, both current and future, is needed. The completion of such a study is both complex and critical. New or existing administrative and operations facilities may last for a half century or more and therefore must be carefully planned for future as well as present needs. The development of new facilities, the renovation of existing quarters, or no changes to existing buildings at all will have financial, operational, and service delivery impacts that must be recognized and understood prior to selecting preferred alternatives. -+~ It is recommended that the staff prepare a work program for a comprehensive study of space needs for Roanoke County governmental offices and operations, constitutional offices, and Roanoke County School Administrative offices and operations. The staff will complete a work program and a problem definition for the Board of Supervisors to review by July 12. These statements will determine the time and resources needed to complete the study as well as the monetary and nonmonetary impacts of both the defined problems and the proposed scope of work. It is anticipated that the work program can be completed in 90 to 120 days after Board of Supervisors approval. It is also recommended that the completion of a comprehensive study of space needs be correlated with the departmental master planning process and the preparation of the County's capital improvements program. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Rob Stalzer Director of Planning & Zoning Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers .~' ; VOTE No Yes Abs ~_ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGE~]CY Original Budget at July 1, 1987 $13,942 August 18, 1987 Regional Airport Expenses (Approved Administratively) (3,772) October 13, 1987 Valleypointe Project - Binder for Land Purchase (1,000) November 17, 1987 Land Acquisition Monies No Longer Needed to be Appropriated 49,390 November 17, 1987 Purchase of 2 Vehicles (19,233) December 9, 1987 Purchase of Microwave (Approved Administratively) (244) February 9, 1988 Restoration of Courthouse Portraits (8,350) May 10, 1988 Wellness Program (3,400) May 10, 1988 Meals Tax Expenses (11,500) Possible Appropriations on the May 24, 1988 Meeting: Appraisal for Palmer Property (4,250) Balance as of May 24, 1988 11 583 Submitted by ~ ~, ~ • ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance °~ COU[~fi'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1987 July 14, 1987 Sale of Courthouse Revenues Reclassified from General Fund to Capital Fund August 25, 1987 Sale of Mountain View Technological Park Tract October 13, 1987 Net Proceeds from VDOT for Easement in Front of Vinton Library March 8, 1988 Renovations to Public Safety Building May 18, 1988 Survey Work Related to Old Courthouse (Approved Administratively) May 18, 1988 Screening for Mountain View Technological Park (Approved Administratively) Balance as of May 24, 1988 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ -0- 25,000 107,207 6,180 (130,000) (4,350) (2,400) 1 637 „„ I COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - ~2AL FUND Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1987 $1,010,687 June 23, 1987 Additional Revenues from Septic Tank Fees 29,000 July 14, 1987 Reappropriate Revenues from Sale of (25,000) Courthouse (Memo: An Additional $150,000 for Sale of Land is budgeted as General Fund Revenues, but will not be Realized by General Fund) (42,793)* July 28, 1987 Revise Budget for Victim/Witness Grant (1,000) August 11, 1987 Storm Sewer Construction - Ogden Road (10,200) *August 25, 1987 Sale of Mountain View Technological Park Tract Reclassified to Capital Fund (107,207) October 27, 1987 Completion of Starkey Park (67,010) December 1, 1987 Valleypointe (198,937) December 15, 1987 Excess Revenues over Expenditures as Presented in the Audit Report for the Year Ended June 30, 1987 1,052,806 January 12, 1988 Acquisition of Ida Mae Holland Estate (260,000) Balance as of May 24, 1988 1,380,346 The recommended level for fund balance for 1987-88 is $1,597,756, which is 3 percent of the total General Fund budget. Submitted by ~JC.O~r+'i.2, ~C . l~~ Diane D. Hyatt 0 Director of Finance ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session: Roanoke River Tributaries Flood Control Study Corps of Engineers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~~ ~"~ BACKGROUND M~~~ ~t~.~" ~ .- ~~~rw"` The Board of Supervisors' interest in flood control, stormwater management and drainage maintenance has been very prevalent in the past five to ten years. Steps towards reducing the effects of storms and floods have been initiated in the recent past. The initial step in determining the extent of the problem and possible solutions is to prepare a comprehensive review of each major watershed. Together with the other valley governments, Roanoke County has taken steps toward the solutions to these problems. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1985, Roanoke County, along with the other local governments, requested the Corps of Engineers to study the tributary streams of the Roanoke River to determine what flood control measures could be taken to reduce the effects of local floods. The Corps of Engineers agreed to study eighteen streams in the Valley of which five are located in Roanoke County. Representatives from the Corps of Engineers will discuss the status of their work on the streams located in Roanoke County and the preliminary findings of any work completed. The Board should keep in mind that each and every solution will be expensive and each will contribute to flood reduction and not flood control. Solutions may or may not allow ~" r ., "' / federal participation, and consequently may require local funding for a majority or all of the project costs. The results of each stream study should be weighed for its benefits and costs. The Board may wish to consider all flood reduction projects and their costs together in order to make a more objective funding decision. An effective flood reduction and stormwater management program requires a large commitment by the County and its citizens. Piecemeal approaches to solving the problem may not provide the assumed protection. The Board's commitment to date has only been maintenance of drainage ways. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is obvious there will be no quick, inexpensive solution to Carvins Creek flooding nor other stream problems. It is imperative that the Board support the continued study of the remaining tributaries and consideration of a solution and its funding for Carvins Creek should be resolved along with other tributary solutions. SUBMITTED BY: yr - ~ ~~L John Hub rd, P. E. Assistant County Administrator Community Services & Development Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: _ APPROVED BY: Elmer C. odg County Administrator VOTE Yes No Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens _ Robers Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE STATE AAU CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM, THE ROANOKE VALLEY SQUIRES WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Squires basketball team, composed of twelve and thirteen year old boys from Roanoke, Cave Spring and Botetourt County, recently won the State AAU Championship, in Staunton, Virginia, compiling a 5 - 0 overall record; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Squires, coached by Lacy Dudley, and assisted by Tom Ondrus, and Scott Prince, will play in the national AAU finals beginning August 6, 1988, in Lawrence, Kansas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia congratulates and commends the following members of the Roanoke Valley Squires for their outstanding athletic achievement: Greg Cooper Bobby Prince Tim Basham Steven Kagey Mike Bramblett Stephen Hawks Trey Ondrus Daniel Orfield Greg Journette Curtis Staples Jay Turner J. P. Wilson and further, expresses its strong support that the Roanoke Valley Squires will be victorious at the national AAU tournament in Lawrence, Kansas. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 RESOLUTION 52488-10 CONGRATULATING THE STATE AAU CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM, THE ROANORE VALLEY SQUIRES WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Squires basketball team, composed of twelve and thirteen year old boys from Roanoke, Cave Spring and Botetourt County, recently won the State AAU Championship, in Staunton, Virginia, compiling a 5 - 0 overall record; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Squires, coached by Lacy Dudley, and assisted by Tom Ondrus, and Scott Prince, will play in the national AAU finals beginning August 6, 1988, in Lawrence, Kansas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia congratulates and commends the following members of the Roanoke Valley Squires for their outstanding athletic achievement: Greg Cooper Bobby Prince Tim Basham Steven Kagey Mike Bramblett Stephen Hawks Trey Ondrus Daniel Orfield Greg Journette Curtis Staples Jay Turner J. P. Wilson and further, expresses its strong support that the Roanoke Valley Squires will be victorious at the national AAU tournament in Lawrence, Kansas. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: ..~~ ` Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: Resolutions of Congratulations File File 2 ~~~ ~~ ~ !!~.1-!~'-~,~.~.~ fit„' LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT P. O. BOX 2006$ MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA EDWARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018- 1699 G~STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD May 1 1 , 1 988 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Glen E. Long and James W. Harris, Sr. Rezoning Gentlemen: Q TELEPHONE 703-774-1197 This is to advise that the above Petitioners hereby withdraw their request to rezone a tract of land containing less than 1 acre located at 3303 Mount Pleasant Boulevard in the Vinton Magisterial District. By copy of this letter, I am requesting that the Roanoke Times 8 World News cancel the Legal Notice for such petition which has been scheduled to be advertised on May 17, 1988. I realize that it is too late to cancel the May 10th publication and I would request that a bill for the same be submitted to me. Should you have any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, OSTERFIOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON`~S AGEE, P.C. Edward A. Natt EAN/pc cc: Mr. James W. Harris, Sr. 4332 Brookridge Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Roanoke Times ~ World News Legal Ad Department P. O. Box 2491 Roanoke, VA 24010 PETITIONER: VIRGINIA FIRST SAVINGS, F.S.B. ~`~~ r CASE NCfl~~BER: 24-5/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 3, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 24, 1988 A. REQUEST Petition of Virginia First Savings, F.S.B. to rezone a 0.787 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a building containing a bank and offices, located immediately southwest of the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) and Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIG[~iIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS (1) Amenities: Concept plan shows 46 parking spaces. Ordinance requires only 26. Staff suggests that the eight spaces shown next to the right-of-way easement should be eliminated. Cars pulling into and out of these spaces will directly interfere with thru traffic in both directions on this right-of-way. Even if these are designated as employee parking to minimize the amount of movement in and out of the spaces, employees leaving during the lunchtime hours and at the end of the day may still obstruct thru traffic to and from the 7-11 store during some of its busiest hours. The parking lot will be lighted, with lights directed into the site. These will probably have minimal use as the bank does not expect nighttime hours at this time. Pedestrian lighting will also be provided under the building overhangs and down low by the walkways. (2) Circulation: Site has indirect access to Route 419 via Chaparral Drive and side entrance to parking lot of existing 7-11 store. Petitioner will use existing entrance off Chaparral Drive as main entrance. One way circulation, though difficult to enforce, may lessen potential congestion and circulation problems at the entrance since the parking lot entrance is located so close to the main entrance off Chaparral Drive. No location is identified for an ATM. The location of a machine in a separate kiosk away from the main building could cause circulation problems with the proposed layout. Staff suggests that any future ATM be located against the building. The location of the drive-in windows should be such that exiting traffic in the parking lot is not hampered by two rows of cars lined up at the windows. There does not appears now to be room for two rows of cars to stack behind the windows, or existing cars to pass, and a row of parking spaces along Route 419 frontage. Staff suggests eliminating the 8 parking spaces adjacent to the right-of-way easement and shifting the building closer to the easement in order to open up the exit/parking/drive-in stacking area. Staff also suggests reserving the spaces toward the rear of the property (near the 7-11) and adjacent to Route 419 as employee parking, in order to decrease traffic movement in the drive-in window area. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS ~~ ~'-;~ (1) Office building will be built in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan. (2) All lighting in parking areas will be directed downward with minimum lighted areas during evening hours. (3) No lighting on the identification sign after banking hours. (4) In the event an automatic teller machine is installed, it will be installed against the building. (5) The spaces designed for employee parking on the design plan will be used for employee parking only. (6) The sign will be constructed in accordance with the submitted design plan. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Don Witt moved to approve the request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: Jones F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: p_ , G~~~~~dw Dale Castel ow, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission - 2 - ~; ', ~ CNLY tiJ 1 ~j ~ k:I t --- _.__ __ a W ~i i -' n (~ ( -- ~f~I a C ~tu;•r-- x I~ ~ I ~ I ~~ ~ i- ~ ~ ~ 1- I ~ ~ ~ ~$ ~ t ~ ~~ ~ ~' I- ~ ~ ~ I I ~ , ~~ I ~w ~ _ I ~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ` o ~_ fir== - - -=ice t - ,' I! ;- %~?~R ~ ,o-- -^ ~~ EX}S~1NG EtY~E OF F~~~Nf~11=-T - - - - -- - G ~ ~ 1° ~, FZ Fz,,~. L U R ~~l ~~r~ s-TVCrr- 3 G ~ - - .-- 1 I i ' ~ _ _ - -_-_= _ _ - ,~_ --- - E.A~ST ELEV~.TIOI~I ---.. __ .. • _. _ .. 1 ° I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ___- -__- _ _ ---__- __. ___ _ _ _. SOUTH ELEVATION - 4 - ~~ D N(1RTL1 .3 - le 17 O ~ r , ear ~ 4 z O 40 77~ y ~ , ` IS tie b _ ~ • ~ b ,` O I ' L69A~ .,III om >. ' ~ R) Q O ~ R t. -4 l9 1.1 . ~ ~ © 'o .,~ •~, , 3 a 'r~o ' r 63 ~ i o 61 $ 62 ~ i c Z P ~' !~ ~ ~ ~ It7s .•,4 ~ ~ ,..M 18 3 v ~ 19 - ? / ~ 20 w z,.w y ~2 7 n H ro t~ ' Ir'. s 7 tr F4 ~S ,~ 1 rl f3 p O / 12 .. i. as Ac d Nue .sa` n~ P n77 ~ ~ / Z tX• ~* 6. JattsrY 1~7 .. 7? xs B a 2.33 ac o ~~ ~~~ 0 8.1 n 0 1~.>s 9 ~r ~~a ~i it Y p ` ~ J / 2 ~ y ..~ Z24ac a~ rrr n v R .y A 121.N 107.7 ~` ~ / 71.p ~ •• O £~ All parcels are zoned R-1 / ~ unless othercaise noted. __ .y y/ ai r i \ \ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~ t%ir~;inia first Savings, F. S. 13. --~ ROANOKE COUNTY I~-3 tc> 13-i a3,~ :? DEPARTMENT OF DEVEIOPMFNT I':I~- nt-,,, .'i R~ n~ i ~ ^ ~v[~~[ 1 1 l[IHC `.ti ar .~~~ - z CASE NUMBER: 24-5/88 REVIEWED BY: Lynn Johnson STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: VA First Savings Bank, FSB DATE: May 3, 1988 Petition of VA First Savings Bank, F.S.B. to rezone a 0.787 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a building containing a bank and offices, located immediately southwest of the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) and Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. The petitioner is requesting to construct a two-story banking and mortgage/lending office facility with two drive-in windows. b. The petitioner has proffered that the building will be built in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan. This does not relieve. petitioner from conforming to all applicable County regulations. c. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B1 zoning permits a variety of office uses, including financial offices (banks). b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT reports that the existing entrance off Chaparral Dr. will have to be upgraded to present commercial standards, most likely with a right turn lane. d. County Utility staff needs notification before any grading is performed, due to the location of a sanitary easement and storm sewer line through the property. e. Location of sign less than 15' from the right-of-way, as shown on the concept plan, will require a variance from the BZA. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat, sloping gently to Chaparral Dr. b. Ground Cover: Grass. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated as a medium to high growth area currently receiving urban services. b. General area is developed with mixed commercial, office, institution, and single-family and multi-family residential. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS - 6 - LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ? a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition Land Use category. Office uses are encouraged with high compatibility. The proposed use is consistent with policies TR-3: Reserve frontage strips for major office facilities, and TR-7: Coordinate vehicular movement among adjacent sites, provide shared access where possible. The concept plan is inconsistent with policy TR-8: Building facades should be prominant from street view, rather than parking lots. ? b. Surrounding Land: Office and limited commercial. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Office, limited commercial, single-family and multi-family residential. 3 d. Site Layout: Determined partially by existing entrance and location of a sanitary easement and storm sewer line through the property. Inconsistent with policy TR-8, the parking area is prominant from street view rather than the building. The parking area adjacent to Rt. 419 and Chaparral Dr. is also shown as one continuous row of spaces. The 419 Frontage Development Plan suggests separating long rows of parking spaces with plantings. (See also "Screening and Landscape" and "Amenities") ? e. Architecture: The buildings will be of the design shown in the concept plan. They will be built with a light color brick, to compliment the surrounding Fralin & Waldron buildings, and a blue standing-seam metal roof. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: The perimeter of the parking areas adjacent to the Rt 419 and Chaparral Dr. rights-of-way and the dumpster area must be landscaped and screened per ordinance. Staff suggests that some of these perimeter parking spaces may be used as planting areas to break up the long row of spaces (see Site Layout), and may incorporate some of the trees required by the ordinance for screening and buffering. 4 g; Amenities: Concept plan shows 46 parking spaces. Ordinance requires only 26. Staff suggests that the eight spaces shown next to the right-of-way easement should be eliminated. Cars pulling into and out of these spaces will directly interfere with through traffic in both directions on this right-of-way. Even if these are designated as employee parking to minimize the amount of movement in and out of the spaces, employees leaving during the lunchtime hours and at the end of the day may still obstruct through traffic to and from the 7-11 store during some of its busiest hours. The parking lot will be lighted, with lights directed into the site. These will probably have minimal use as the bank does not expect nighttime hours at this time. Pedestrian lighting will also be provided under the building overhangs and down low by the walkways. - 7 - '~ --~ ? h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Site is located at the intersection of Rt. 419 and Chaparral Drive. The facility is expected to generate 594 trip ends per weekday (based on 5000 gross square feet and two drive-in windows.) Traffic in and out of the site will be significantly increased if an automatic teller machine (ATM) is installed in the future. The 1986 ADT for Chaparral Drive between Rt. 419 and Penn Forest Blvd (Rt 687) is 10,191. The 1986 ADT for Rt. 419 between Starkey Rd. (Route 904) and Bramble ton Ave. (Route 221} is 28,945. VDOT reported no accidents for the Rt 419/Chaparral Dr. intersection since January 1987. However, for the nearby intersection of Chaparral Dr. and Penn Forest Blvd., there were 5 accidents reported in 1987 and 1 so far in 1988. 4 j• Circulation: Site has indirect access to Rt. 419 via (1) Chaparral Drive and (2) side entrance to parking lot of existing 7-11 store. Petitioner will use existing entrance off Chaparral Dr. as main entrance. One way circulation, though difficult to enforce, may lessen potential congestion and circulation problems at the entrance since the parking lot entrance is located so close to the main entrance off Chaparral Dr. No location is identified for an ATM. The location of a machine in a separate kiosk away from the main building could cause circulation problems with the proposed layout. Staff suggests that any future ATM be located against the building. The location of the drive-in windows should be such that exiting traffic in the parking lot is not hampered by two rows of cars lined up at the windows. There does not appear now to be room for (1)two rows of cars to stack behind the windows, (2) exiting cars to pass, and (3)a row of parking spaces along Rt. 419 frontage. Staff suggests eliminating the 8 parking spaces adjacent to the right-of-way easement and shifting the building closer to the easement, in order to open up the exit/parking/drive-in stacking area. Staff also suggests reserving the spaces toward the rear of the property (near the 7-11) and adjacent to Rt.419 as employee parking, in order to decrease traffic movement in the drive-in window area. UTILITIES 2 k• Water: Adequate source and transmission. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate transmission and treatment. DRAINAGE ? m. Basin: Murray Run. No problems noted. 2 n. Floodplain: The. site is located just beyond the limit of the F.I.A. detailed Floodplain study area. The elevation of the property is higi~er than the elevation of the property directly across Rt. 419 which is located in the floodplain. - 8 - PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A N/A r. School: N/A TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: 5580,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: None - Total Employees: 10 - 15 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately 56,670 New Revenue $4,209 ENVIRONMENT ? t. Air: ? u. Water: ? v. Soils: ? w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Location of the sign as shown on the concept plan Will require a variance from the BZA. Design has not been proffered. The 419 Frontage Development Plan suggests that if the bank will not have nighttime hours, signs should not be illuminated. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. Petitioner's request is consistent with the Land Use Plan Map and with policies TR-3 and TR-7. The request is not in agreement with policy TR-8. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposed use is encouraged in the Transition Land Use category. (2) The proposal utilizes an existing entrance off of Chaparral Dr. b. Weaknesses: (1) There is a potential for circulation problems associated with the parking spaces adjacent to the right of way easement, the location of the drive-in kiosks, and the unspecified location of any automatic teller machine. (2) Parking is located along perimeter of property, adjacent to the street rights-of-way. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) One way circulation should be maintained as much as possible at entrance to parking lot, in order to lessen the possibility of congestion and circulation problems near the Chaparral Dr. entrance. (2) Even if there is not one scheduled for installation, the location of any future automatic teller machine against the main building and not in a separate kiosk elsewhere on the site should be proffered. (3) There should be no illumination of sign during nighttime hours, consistent with 419 Frontage Development Plan. - 9 - ~~"~ rn H z w H Z O U 0 H cn Q W 0 a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.787 acre parcel of land, ) generally located intersection of ) Rt. 419 & Chaparral Drive ) AMENDED within the Cave Spring ) PROFFER Magisterial District, and ) of recorded as parcel # 87.06 4~4 ) CONDITIONS in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Virginia First Savings, F.S.B., hereby voluntarily amends the proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adding the following additional conditions to the rezoning of the above-reference parcel of land: (1) Office building will be built in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan; (2) All lighting in parking areas will be directed downward, with minimum lighted areas during evening hours; (3) There will be no lighting on the identification sign after banking hours; (4) In the event an automatic teller machine is installed, it will be installed against the building; - 12 - C~ "` (5) The spaces designed for employee parking on the design plan will be used for employee parking only; (6) The sign will be constructed in accordance with the submitted design plan. Respectfully submitted, VIRGINIA FIRST SAVINGS, F.S.B. Petitioner i B v : ~' its attorney - 13 - •~°"~ ~ ' , ~, ~,, , ... rn ro +~ +~ G 0 u 0 m b 0 ~+ a. VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO[JNTY A 0. 7 8 7 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at intersection ) Rt. 419 & Chaparral Drive ) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 8 7. 0 6 - 4 - 4 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. FINAL ORDER `I'0 THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Virginia First Savings , F . S . B . did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from R-3 Residential District to B-1 Office Use District for the purpose of constructing an office and banking structure WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on May 3 19 88 at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on May 24 19 88, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 87.06 - 4-4 and recorded i n Deek Book 12 6 6 Page 7 9 2 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-3 Residential District to B-1 Office District. - 10 - Legal Description of Property: ~.Y ,. ...:.:~ BEGINNING at a concrete monument on the south side of Va. Rt. No. 419, at the intersection with the west side of Va. Sec. Rt. No. 800; thence S. 28° 44' 54" E. 53.10 feet to a concrete monument; thence with the westerly side of Va. Sec. Rt. No. 800, S. 21° 13' 32" W. 139.56 feet to an iron; thence with the remaining property of Fralin & Waldron, Inc., N. 70° 35' 19" G~7. 200.00 feet to an iron; thence with another line, D7. 21° 13' 32" E. 175.00 feet to the southerly side of Va. Rt. No. 419; thence with the line of Rt. 419, S. 70° 35' 19" E. 159.32 feet to the BEGINNING, and containing 34,262.29 square feet, and being 0.787 acre parcel BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Robers and upon the following recorded vote: Ate: Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett ~YS' None ABSENT: None ~ ~~ /~ ,~,~, Deputy C~-~- Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections - 11 - ~r~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.787 acre parcel of land, ) generally located intersection of ) 2nd Rt. 419 & Chaparral Drive ) AMENDED within the Cave Spring ) PROFFER Magisterial District, and ) of recorded as parcel # 8.7.06 4-4 ) CONDITIONS in the Roanoke County Tax Records TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISOPS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Virginia First Savings, F.S.B., hereby voluntarily amends the proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adding the following additional conditions tci the rezoning of the above-reference parcel of land: (1) Office building will be built in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan; (2) .All lighting. in parking areas -will be directed downward, with minimum lighted areas during evening hours; (3) There will be no lighting on the identification sign after 10:00 p.m.; (4) In the event an automatic teller machine is installed, it will be installed against the building; ., ~ , -a- (5) The spaces designed for employee parking on the design plan will be used for employee parking only; (6) The sign will be constructed in accordance with the submitted design plan, and the proposed design plan will be submitted to the Planning Department fir approval prior to construction of said sign. Respectfully submitted, VIRGINIA FIRST SAVINGS, F.S.B. Petitioner By. its attorney - _ -- -- REVISED %' . - : f: - ' ww1Y • uwrlw~ ~a 1worl.ot • Vw1 alM DI 7 N I N N Y l d u N y i^ A 1 1 7 1 1 N~^ y $3LYiJOm $SV QNY NpQY3W K~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~au~oH '2I'~Iil!wl~ V r A W H w a F t ~~ 9 ~ _ ~} J E Y ~;1I1 •Y1y F k~ g qq~ I a ~ 2 6'iib e ~ ~ i1- tt :): a ae-u ~. p~i s1:i7S ;~ ° a _~lpea ~ ~ 4~ ~~ ~t.: f .a:li e ~ 9 I ~ S a f:~ 3 a '- ~~ __ ~~ l~~It6~ S °~ t att yy D .a 3=.°a : S t°._ ul ~~ ~: a Y~ ! jrE~! 6 7 ~ y ~ is y 55 i'.. 9 s % ~4 ~sq'~ ~ i e ~~ :f '41 I ~ •°n-e f e! 2c8 . .4 ~2 ~ ~fS ~ ~ °_ Esd i.8 62~ yq c'¢~:ii( ~ .i ;~V ~ 1•.p : ~ ~ ;¢i Y,~= ~ ,. ., 3 : 4 i .j§tii~ ate 3="_ °¢ 4itsca }; _ ~ ;I ,yq9~):P t .~i'~ Yi - ~!4 E ty t .. f~6 _~ _:=;¢,¢6 ~i: 933 .) 2~y8i~ii ~ S' ~: ;~ .ftSj 9~ .~:¢.~ .~ ~ i ~ d` O~ •d~ -- sir - -_-; ; -- ~_ ~~~' __ ------------ _ ~ ~ 111 i ' ~ \~~\ f \~ I I % ~ ~ \\\ O W f I I ~~ir \~ 1 ii . 6 ~ ~3 ~ l) f s" I ,•~ ~ I ~ W I I v ~ > I '' -~ cc Q 1 h yd S ~ _ ~I ~ II ~ ~ i I ~1... J ~ I j _ - i ~ ~ (~~ ~ ~~ I III i. ~ ~ ', ~ _ t ~ 1 J I f ~ I Sx ~ i~ J i ~ - ~ i .o ~/ i Q O I ~ ~ .` ~ - - _- f - - 4,, ~ ~ p J~ - i -- r~~ ~ ~ k - - ~ Q ~I ~ I I r ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ , i I ~~ Q ~~ ~ m L' __ _ - ~ ---- ~oui uoya'1vM aw wwyd ,b Jpa~J \ ~ - -_ .. .a .~ .SS ^ii ~ ~~~~° - ~C Y~ ~• 2 ~ ~ ~~ 2 LJ D o c~ S~ f ~~ e W V r ~ ~` ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ J f7 rE f i p Y. U i P ~s q~ .~ ~ us c lis ~! i~.•3_4 d.r ~ ~ ! f°14'2 ~ ~ i !~ ~ zl ~ . rg~ [ ,~E ~} ~ G~G~ 9 ~¢ yyi ~1¢ !F~ ff'I~:i'~ i`-; {~a 4 4 rt11~1 F ~ _.• :~ q•q ~ ~ 1 Z 5 .a <," ~,~~~, ,: ~~ Kz ~ :n~{~ •s `: li.iaaq' i@' 1=a °~ if i't' !a _ ~i' i° a2 e pp a ~° i ~ 9 ~ n -:, n r ;' F ?(6 'o .j~f~:ti0 ~{" Sid .' isio~_,. - ~ fSI~ ^~~ i `; ~fi _i: ~ N N A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC~HEARING ON ~ ~ ~~~„~~ 'p(Zp ~ ~~~ ~. rz, I would 1'ke the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize m during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may co ent. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN LLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE CORD. 1. Each speaker ill have between three and five minutes available whet er speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the num er of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the ule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do of erwise. 2. Speakers will be li 'ted to a presentation of their point of view only. Question of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be di`~ected to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audince will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to le ve any written statements and/or comments with the cler . 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTH RIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRES NT THEM. ~'~ P L E A S E W R I T E L E ~w I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS : "t' c~ PHONE : ~ ~~ - PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) i 5~ v`,~ ~ ~ ~-- ~ w A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~ U I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE : / / y ` PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.> A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .--~ , ~ NAME : ,~'`~~. ~~°,a~:~-~t ~~ ~~ ~~ ~i~~ %'t~~ ADDRESS : yG .~..~ /n ;;e,~ ~'urY' ~,~ ~~ ~ ~J /` GGZ`/p~~ ~ PHONE : j~~`j - Q,o° ~ ~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) PETITIONER: HOBART COMPANIES CASE N[A~RBER: 27-5/88 .,5~~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 3, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 24, 1988 A. REQUEST Petition of the Hobart Companies to rezone a 14.93 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to construct an office complex, located on the north side of Electric Road (Route 419) approximately 700 feet west of its intersection with Postal Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION John Shumate, Roger Lorden and Lloyd Lazarus voiced their concerns: light glare fran the parking area; drainage with potential for flooding; traffic; trash from dumpsters; noise; increased road accidents on Route 419. There were two present in opposition and five who supported the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS (1) Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation for the proposal is between 1,900 and 2,280 average daily trips (ADT), based on the number of employees (500 to 600 employees). In 1986, ADT along Route 419 adjacent to the site was 29,470. The ADT on McVitty Road, south of Route 419 in 1986 was 2,825 with 360 ADT north of Route 419. Accident records from VDOT indicate there were 9 accidents on Route 419 in the vicinity of this proposal from January 1987 through February 1988, 6 of which were located at the intersection with McVitty Road, south of Route 419. The Fifth Planning District Commission reports that the level of service of Route 419 in the vicinity of this project is either "A" or "B," indicating unconstrained to slightly constrained traffic flows under present conditions. (2) Circulation: Circulation on-site appears to be well designed. According to the concept plan submitted, access is proposed at two points; at Colonnade I and at Signet Bank. The access proposed through Signet Bank would provide indirect access to and from Route 419. However, the access point at Signet Bank is not signalized, lacks a left turn deceleration lane for eastbound traffic (although a median cut exists for the County Library), and is located only 400 feet from the traffic signal at Postal Drive. These conditions could create a potentially hazardous intersection should this project utilize this access point. Access to Postal Drive is possible by traversing the post office parking lot, but would increase congestion in that parking area. Therefore, this second access should be eliminated from the proposal. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS (1) Project will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Ernie Rose Architects. (2) There will be no additional entrance/exits on Route 419. (3) Screening and buffering will be as proposed on the site plan. (4) All lighting will be directed away from the adjoining residential property. Poles shall be no more than 20 feet in height. (5) Signage will be as similar in size and configuration to the existing sign on Phase 1. (6) No residential uses will be placed on the property. (7) Architecture will be compatible with Colonnade Corporate Center. (8) Dempster location for Phase 1 to be approved in staff review. 58~ - ~ E. CONY~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mike Gordon moved to approve the request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: Jones F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: a~~ ~~~~~ Dale Castellaw, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Co~unission - 2 - r_ 2 D ~A I rnmN Z T ~~ a ,~\~ - 3 - ..,~.~ ~5f~~;B ' i`•-~~E r2 ,- It~~~; ~ ® 7 S c.l~. l O W 70 l J O D PP f ~ ~ ~: ~ z 0 Its } ' v / ~ 0 m -,1~ . ~ ~ ~ z m -~-~~ ~ ~ O Z Z -~ ~ D n _ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~., ._-m .. ~~ ~` `~. :~` ~ ~ ~ = r '~ t ~8~3 -~ ~,.. D ~nRru 8 - 4 - VAN L~ ' ROANOKE COUNTY The Hobart Companies ° .r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT I2-1 to 13-2 ~~G~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 27-5/88 PETITIONER: The Hobart Companies REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: April 29, 1988 Petition of the Hobart Companies to rezone a 14.93 acre tract from R-1 Residential to B-2, Business to construct an office complex to be known as Colonnade II, located on the north side of Electric Road (Route 419) approximately 700 feet west of its intersection with Postal Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct four (4) office buildings with a total of 137,000 square feet of floor area on a 14.93 acre site, with building sizes ranging from 50,000 to 28,500 square feet. The petitioner plans to include a restaurant in the complex to primarily serve employees and patrons. Building and parking improvements will occupy approximately 45% of the site with the remaining area (55°s) to remain as open space. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. . 2. APPLICABLE~REGULATIONS a. Petitioner has requested that the rezoning request be down-scaled to B-l, Office District from the original request for B-2, Business. The B-1, Office District, permits a wide range of office uses, including professional offices, financial offices including banks and real estate agencies, and dental and medical offices and clinics. Restaurants, pharmacies and retail sales to serve occupants and patrons are permitted as accessory uses, as long as they do not exceed l0% of the gross floor area. In addition, two family and multi-family residential uses are permitted in the B-1 district. Petitioner has proffered, as a condition, substantial conformity with the concept plan (undated), and has also proffered no residential uses. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Since the proposal will use existing access points, no new entrance permit will be required from Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). However they would like to review the site plans to determine the effect of this project on Route 419. d. The ordinance requires one parking space per 200 square feet of business space which may not be met by this proposal and would require a variance. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Project site is located on a knoll which slopes to the north, south and west. b. Ground Cover: Site is heavily5wQoded. 58~'-~ 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stabilize growth. b. General area is comprised of offices, institutional uses and open space along Route 419, with single family residences behind the frontage properties. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan and 419 Frontage Development Plan have placed this area within a Transition land use category. Petition is in conformance with both the land use plan map and policies. Specifically, Policy TR-3 (reserve frontage for major office facilities), TR-7 (coordinate vehicular movement among adjacent sites and provide shared access), and TR-9 (provide screening and buffering between less intensive residential uses) have been addressed in this proposal. Policy TR-8, enhance the quality of highway frontage development, has been addressed by utilizing existing topography to maintain the development site above the grade of Route 419, although the majority of the parking is in front of the buildings. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Comprised of offices, institutional uses and open space along Route 419, with single family residences behind the frontage properties. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Adjacent to the east and west are offices, with single family residences to the north. 3 d. Site Layout: Access to the site would be limited to the existing entrance to Colonnade I (opposite McVitty Road south, Route 1662), with a second access via a frontage road to the east through the Signet Bank property. The parking and buildings will be located above the grade of Route 419, with a majority of the parking located in front of the buildings. The number of parking spaces indicated on the concept plan (547 spaces) is less than required by ordinance (685 spaces), but more than the average number for 600 employees (474 spaces} suggested in Parking Generation by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These figures may vary depending upon whether net or gross floor area is used for determining parking requirements. A variance in required parking may be required. 2 e. Architecture: Petitioner has proffered that the architecture will be compatible with Colonnade Corporate Center. - 6 - 5'~~ - ~ ? f. Screening and Landscaping: According to the concept plan, an extensive buffer yard ranging from 60 to 100 feet will be maintained between the developed portion of the site and the adjoining residential properties to the north. The ordinance requires a minimum buffer yard of 25 feet, with small evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs. Petitioner has indicated that the natural vegetation will be maintained as much as possible. ? g. Amenities: The trash dumpster site, according to the concept plan, is located in the north east corner of the developed portion of the site. The petitioner proffered that all lighting will be directed away from adjoining residential property, but has not indicated the location or type of lighting to be utilized. ? h. Natural Amenities: A substantial portion of the site, particularly the buffer yard adjoining the residences on the north of the site, is to remain in natural condition. The petitioner's engineer has indicated that a number of trees in the development site are also to be maintained. TRAFFIC 4 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation for the proposal is bet~teen 1900 and 2280 average daily trips (ADT), based on the number of employees (500 to 600 employees). In 1986, ADT along Route 419 adjacent to the site was 29,470. The ADT on McVitty Road, south of Route 419 in 1986 was 2825, with 360 ADT north of Route 419. Accident records from VDOT indicate there were 9 accidents on Route 419 in the vicinity of this proposal from January 1987 thru February 1988, 6 of which were located at the intersection with McVitty Rd.,.south of Route 419. The Fifth PDC reports that the level of service of Route 419 in the vicinity of this project is either "A" or "B", indicating unconstrained to slightly constrained traffic flows under present conditions. 5 j. Circulation: Circulation on-site appears to be well designed. According to the concept plan submitted, access is proposed at two points; at Colonnade I and at Signet Bank. The access proposed through Signet Bank, would provide indirect access to and from Route 419. However, the access point at Signet Bank is not signalized, lacks a left turn deceleration lane for eastbound traffic (although a median cut exists for the County Library), and is located only 400 feet from the traffic signal at Postal Drive. These conditions could create a potentially hazardous intersection should this project utilize this access point. Access to Postal Drive is possible by traversing the post office parking lot, but would be increase congestion in that parking area. Therefore, this second access should be eliminated from the proposal. - 7 - s.s~~- ~ The primary access at the existing entrance at Colonnade I, is directly opposite McVitty Rd. (south}. According to a traffic study prepared by Clearbrook, at the request of the petitioner, "signalization of the intersection of Route 419/McVitty Rd./Colonnade is warranted today by existing traffic volumes on Route 419 and McVitty Road". Should VDOT concur that signalization of this intersection is required, the petitioner could be requested to contribute to the cost of the traffic signal in an amount proportionate to the project's impact. However, since no new entrance permit is anticipated for this proposal, VDOT's review would only be informal. Therefore, the staff recommends that the petitioner submit the study and site plans to VDOT for review and agree to comply with intersection improvements requested by VDOT. Petitioner has proffered no additional access points on Route 419. UTILITIES ? k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. ? 1. ,Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: Located in the Mud Lick Creek drainage basin. Mud Lick Creek runs-along the western boundary of the property, but no construction, other than the access road is proposed near this waterway. The Engineering Department has raised concern with drainage from the site and has recommended that all drainage from the developed portion of the site be directed to Mud Lick Creek to avoid additional run-off along the swale which adjoins residential areas to the rear of the subject property. 3 n. Floodplain: Mud Lick Creek, which flows along the western property boundary is a federally designated flood hazard area. Although no building construction is shown in a flood prone area, the access road will cross the stream channel. The Engineering Department has recommended that the existing box culvert under Route 419 should be extended under the proposed access road to eliminate any obstruction .to flood waters. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: Not applicable. N/A r, Schools: Not applicable. TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Existing= 5291,200 New= 514.7 -16.7 million. - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown - Total Employees: 500 to 600 - Total R evenue to the County/Year: Existing=53,348 New=apE~roaimatelV 5169.050 ~~~' - .~ ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Petitioner has indicated a willingness to proffer the amount of signage but has not specified a maximum square footage. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and policies of the Roanoke County Land Use Plan and the 419 Frontage Development Plan. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Positive effect on tax base, in keeping with 75/25 policy, and provision of employment opportunities. (2) Consistent with land use plan map and policies. (3) Concept plan, restriction of residential uses, and the architecture have been proffered. (4) No additional access on Route 419 has been proffered. (5) Includes provisions for screening and buffering in excess of ordinance requirements. (6) Provides for shared access. (7) Expands a project which has been asset and model development for the county. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposes to share access to the east at a location that is neither designed for nor can adequately handle. portions of the traffic generated by this project. (2) May amplify traffic at intersection of Route 419 and Colonnade I/McVitty Rd. (south) to a level requiring signalization. (3) No proffer regarding maximum signage has been offered. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Access at eastern end of concept plan should be deleted from concept plan. (2) Petitioner agrees to submit the study and site plans to VDOT for review and agree to comply with intersection improvements requested by VDOT. (3) Maximum square foot of signage should be set. (4) Existing box culvert under Route 419 should be extended under proposed access road. - 9 - ~~~ -~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ------------------------------ u, H z w H z 0 U 0 H w 0 w a 6 ^STERHOUDT, FERGLISON NATT, AHER~N & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24G10-1699 IN RE: A 14.93 acre parcel of land, generally located on the North Side of Va. Sec. Route 419, east of Mudlick and west of the Cave Spring Office Park, within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel No. 76.16-1-38 and Parcel No. 76.16-I-39 in the Roanoke County Tax Records FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD., did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District to B-1, Business District, for the purpose of the development of an office complex. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on May 3, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the proffered conditions on May 24, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel No. 76.16-I-39 and Parcel - 10 - ~~~ No. 76.16-I-38 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-1, Residential District to B-1, Business District. A 14.93 acre parcel of land, generally located on the North Side of Va. Sec. Route 419, east of Mudlick and west of the Cave Spring Uffice Park, within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel No. 76.16-1-38 and Parcel No. 76.16-I-39 in the Roanoke County Tax Records with the following conditions: (1) Project will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Ernie Rose Architects, submitted herewith. (2) There will be no additional entrance/exits on Route 419. (3) Screening and buffering will be as proposed on the site plan of Ernie Rose, Architects. (4) All lighting will be directed away from the adjoining residential property. Poles shall be not more than 20 feet in height (5) Signage will be similar in size and configuration to the existing sign on Phase I. (6) No residential uses will be placed on the property. (7) Architecture will be compatible with Colonade ^STERHOUOT, FERGLISON NATT, AHERON & AGEE Corporate Center. ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1fi99 (8) Dumpster location for Phase I to be approved in staff review. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett Robers seconded by Supervisor _________________, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT: None Deput~k, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors OSTERHOUDT, FERGU50N NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1fi99 cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections r1.e2e.c - 12 - ` A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON '~~~~~~ ~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM., I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have betw~=_en three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the a::d _~.n;:e viii exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T y L E G I B L Y NAME : Ro C~rz-fL. -,~j~.y7~ IV ADDRESS : ~ 3 ~O 5 f-l.Cz.~L-Pf~l~ ~J(L , PHONE : `I 7~' -- Ott "r S PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~~-~~'J --~ J~v PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~--~.~J.~'r / I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : -~ Q~/~J ADDRESS : ~~~'~ ~~ PHONE : =' ~ `~ ~~ _`~ t~ j PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) .~ - A - P P - - E A - - R A - - N C E - - - R E Q U - - - - E S - - T - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ 8 ~ ' ~ 1 ~ C:i ~i ~~Z ~ C~.~ ~';i , I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~ ~--- c, °C ~ ~ }~ :z.8~ ~=~ ~.,°> ADDRESS : ~\ ~~-4 ~~ 1C_ ~ / ~.,-ti ~._ ~ PHONE : 1 l ~ '°" ~ L PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~(~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : / /g~~ ,~~CL ADDRESS : ~~,~/ /~GG ~,(°Ad~ ,D/c' , .S it/ PHONE : `~ ~ ~ -~ ~~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~ .:.~, PETITIONER: M. E. HINMAN & DOMINION TRUST CO. CASE Nf~iBER: 21-4/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 24, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of M.E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Co~nission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. None. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the amendment to the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map fran Development to Transition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATI'ACHNNlENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~L Staff Report ~ ~~ / ~Q ~, Other : ~~~~`c- l.a~y~~:l:c~ w Dale Castellow, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission e" ' D NnQru .._..... / L. F ~: ~ l9 ------------~=j=~ I \ ~ 96t Fc - 2 - A k ROANOKE COUNTY M.E. Hinman & Dominion Trust Co. a DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT eye R-1 & M-2 to B-1 & Land Use Map Amendment ~_ i2 . ~~~~.~ ~ ~ mHr ~. 58 ~ ~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 21-4/88 PETITIONER: M.E. Hinman & Dominion Trust Co. REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow DATE: April 5, 1988 Petition of M.E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to rezone a 3.56 acre tract from R-1, Residential and M-2, Industrial to B-2, Business to operate a retail garden center business, and to amend the Roanoke County Future Land Use Plan from Development to Transition, located on the north and south sides of Hollins Road immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST .. a. Conditional request to operate a retail garden center. The site will be comprised of two existing greenhouses and an outdoor horticultural display area. b. Petitioner's request requires an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from Development to Transition. The land use amendment and the rezoning proposal will be reviewed simultaneously by both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. c. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe the proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2, General Commercial District, permits a wide variety of commercial and office uses. Petitioner has proffered a condition which ensures that the development would occur in substantial conformity with the attached site plan. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. VDOT has advised that since pedestrian travel under the Hollins Road Bridge was not a consideration in the design and construction of the bridge, additional review by the Richmond VDOT office will be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography:,.. Site is moderately sloped towards Tinker Creek. b. Ground Cover: Mature grass, shrubs, and two greenhouses. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area, designated for stimulated growth. The site is located within the urban service area. - 3 - ..m.`~ .~~' e~.rt~ supporting commercial uses. Also, as previously stated, parcels situated on the south side of Hollins Road are designated as Principle Industrial. By extending the Transition land use category to Tinker Creek, future residential uses situated north of Hollins Road will be buffered from the adjacent industrial uses by a commercial strip along Hollins Road. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Predominantly rural (low density resi- dential) with commercial uses located south of the site at the intersection of Hollins and Plantation Roads. Site fronts on a major collector roadway. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Commercial, light industrial, low density residential and a major collector roadway. 3 d. Site Layout: Access to the site would be limited from Hollins Road. Due to a lack of space on the garden center site, the petitioner proposes to locate the parking facility on the vacant lot across from the site on the south side of Hollins Road. To alleviate any potential traffic hazards resulting from pedestrians crossing Hollins Road to reach the garden center, the petitioner plans to construct a pedestrian walkway under the Hollins Road Bridge. The walkway would be constructed of mulch and would connect the garden center with the parking facility. The staff supports the concept of the pedestrian underpass as long as appropriate steps are taken to ensure that customers utilize the walkway. In addition to the vertical slope between the roadway and the parking lot, the petitioner proposes to construct a fence with accompanying plantings to prevent customers from crossing Hollins Road. Also, staff recommends that the petitioner construct a hand rail along the walkway to encourage customers to stay away from Tinker Creek. This will assist handicapped patrons who utilize the walkway. Finally, the petitioner should ensure that the walkway will be adequately lighted. This is particularly critical if the petitioner expects to maintain evening hours of operation. These conditions should be proffered individ- ually or specifically noted on the site plan. The staff also recommends that the petitioner amend the site-plan ar~~elocate the two storage bins shown just -- --west=of- fho-pa-king lot to a location outside of the 100 year flood plain. These items are particularly hazardous during flood conditions. .1/A e. Architecture: 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Screening and buffering will be required per the County ordinance. - 4 - ,~UG~ -"~ b. General area is sparsely developed with low density residential. Some commercial and industrial land uses are located in the general area. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. The Development designation is intended to -- delineate areas for planned residential communities. It is not an appropriate designation for commercial land uses. Consequently, a land use amendment will be required. The petitioner has submitted a request to amend the Future - Land Use Plan from Development to Transition to accommo- _-_ date the proposed retail garden center. The Transition designation is intended to delineate certain highway - frontage strips where orderly development is encouraged. The staff's analysis of the petitioner's proposed amend- ment to Future Land Use Plan Map is included below. As stated, the=proposed garden center site is currently designated as Development on the Future Land Use Plan Map. Except for several properties fronting on the north side of Hollins Road, which are designated as Transition, the Development land use designation encompasses all parcels located between Tinker Creek and Hollins Road, extending north from the Hollins Road Bridge to the north County line. The Transition designation, which includes only those properties that front on the north side of Hollins Road, extends from approximately 1800 feet north of the Hollins Road Bridge to the north County line. One parcel, located approximately 7800 feet north of the bridge is designated as Park and Open Space. All parcels fronting on the south side_of Hollins Road, extending from the Hollins Road Bridge tQ-t~e;~orth County line, are designated as Principal=~~idu~trial. The flood prone areas adjoining Tinker Creek are designated as Surface Water and Flood Hazard areas. The staff is in favor of extending the Transition land use designation further west to Tinker Creek. Since the intersection at Hollins and Plantation Roads currently serves as a commercial node, it seems logical to extend the Transition land use designation to accompany - 5 - J ? g. Amenities: Adequate parking is included on the site plan. 3 h. Natural features:. A significant portion of both the garden center site and tie accompanying parking lot will be located in the 100 year flood plain. Except for two storage bins, the petitioner is not proposing to erect any additional structures within the flood plain. Most of this area will be utilized as a horticulture display area and a parking lot. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation for the proposed use is approximately 35 vehicle trip ends per day. This estimate is based on other specialty retail operations and is calculated by the number of anticipated employees. 1986 ADT on Route 601 (Hollins Road) was 3829. 3 j. Circulation: As previously discussed, the petitioner proposes to locate the nursery and the parking facility on opposite sides of Hollins Road. To prevent any potential __-_ traffic circulation problems that may result from this arrangement, the petitioner plans to construct a pedestri- - an walkway under the Hollins Road Bridge (see "d" Site Layout above).. Appropriate use of the walkway should prevent any circulation problems associated with pedestri- ans on Hollins Road. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE ? m. Basin: No problems noted 3 n. Floodplain: As previously mentioned, a significant portion of the site is located within the 100 year flood plain. Although most the area within the flood plain is designated as a horticultural display area or parking lot, the staff recommends that the petitioner amend the site plan and relocate the storage bins to an area outside of the flood plain. Storage bins, as those illustrated on the-site plan, are not appropriate for flood prone areas. -_- PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: - 6 - ~~~~ 1 TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: Presently - $109,000 Future - $211,500 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $130,000 - Total Employees: 5 - Total revenue to the County/Year: $5,033 New revenue - $3,778 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air. ? u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Petitioner advises that no more than 6 square feet of signage will be erected on the site. This condition should be secured by a proffer or specific designation of such on the site plan. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Development land use category. The petitioner's request is inconsistent with the land use plan map and stated policies. Consequently, the petitioner has submitted a request to amend the land use map designation from Development to Transition. The staff supports the petitioner's request and recommends amending the Future Land Use Map by extending the Transition designation currently on Hollins Road west to Tinker Creek. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposed use is appropriate for the Tinker Creek flood prone area. (2) Petitioner has proffered that development will occur in substantial conformity with the site plan. b. Weaknesses: (1) Site plan identifies two storage bins within the 100 year flood plain. (2) The petitioner should proffer additional conditions regarding sign size and additional fencing along the northern edge of the parking lot. - 7 - s ~ . ~~ " .-..~ fb V ~? V ~°. h ~~ OSTERHOUOT, FERGU5GN NATT, ANERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: ) FINAL ORDER ----- ----- A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally ) located on the north side of Route 601 ) east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins) Magisterial District and recorded as ) part of Parcel No. 38.16-3.1 in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, M. E. HINMAN, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to amend the Land Use Plan of Roanoke County for designation of a 3.56 acre tract east of Tinker Creek on Hollins Road from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation for the purpose of operating a retail garden center business. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on ~1gxi1 'S, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the proffered conditions., on May 24, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the Land Use Plan of Roanoke County be amended for designation of the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the - 8 - C? ~" Roanoke County Tax Maps as a portion of Parcel No. 38.16-3-I and legally described below, from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation. A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601 east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No. 38.16-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson seconded by Supervisor _ Nickens ____~ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYES: None ABSENT None Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ^STERHOUOT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANGKE, VIRGINIA 24010-1699 r2.e13b.c cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections - 9 - •4 "_. / /I PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND CARSON KING CASE N[F4BER: 30-5/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 17, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 24, 1988 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Carson King to vacate a portion of an existing right-of-way known as Airpoint Drive, for a width of 30 to approximately 0 feet beginning at Bent Mountain Road (Route 221) and extending in an easterly direction 365 feet, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. NOTE: Deed to additional right-of-way was received May 17, 1988. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Guy Ferguson, a concerned citizen, was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing in support of the petition. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. None. E. OOMMISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen NAYS: None ABSENT: Winstead F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Jon rtley, Alter to Secretary Roan e County Planning Commission 4 2 S ~ O ,9 D 5 ~`' ~,~/~ o~~ or.~~~~~ C ~" ~- ,Q ~ ~A \ ~~ 6So ~ \ tiT 36 ` 3 O• ~ '~ ~ ~ \ ~'Q/ ~Ewsr ~ ~F CTi~v~~i ~a/~~ ~ ~~i~raF isll~ Y ~j~f/r 6FGt//~Sf l o PE f'fF ~~~~/ ~r YS ~ •y' ~ ,~o ~ ~ ti`' m O ~ `' ~~. ? ? \ ~~ ~ \ ~ 0 a~ °~ o M ~ 2 i i ~~~ ~ A o ~. ~ '`~ BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD (~f. ZZ/> ~~~ 1~ TAx r~nA~ cvo. ~ 0 3 .00 - 3 - 38 ,~/,~i~o/avT ,UTJ/l~E - 2 - SCALE : I " = 60' ~~ a 1 r7 F ._J. ` 6% 5 76 ~ 1 . COYe h^ _ ~~ I~ ~ ) ~ _ 6~1 !Bh C' )]I ~ 9M) /~7 !t. 0 6W ) tF.A, I~~ e h / ~• tea- 4 / e /.~„ ~ ~' _. ,. o '~° '! , ~~ ~ n/i, e .~ 1 Y i me G'Y/ai l~ Y • / / 1 {n~ "'• f ~I ~ o. ~, 6i7 ~ __~ IO \ •~~~ _ '~ rr, ~ J ~~ P Q N K L --- ~ --- \ '~ -VICINITY MAP ~ J ~~'- to D NnRru 21 5.16 Act 22 ..,; / f7 ~ ''a ' t ~ 11.48 Ac(01 ~ / 2 J /9 t •'~ 3 ~~ ~.a7ac Z.so S~ /s ` u f4 [3 ~" l15 J N L fT 6 ~ ~ a n' i 22 / ~ // 38 /~ o° Asa we ' ~ 7 9 _ „ n I f ~'1~ 10.28 pc ~ . 20 22•BAc(D) 3 ~',p ~• .76Ac ~_/ =J /~/ • ~`~ L90AC ~$~ A7 , ~,. 25 Ac ~ 25.4( AC (a i/ S~\ n C ~ x .31 P 23 ~ .r..r u.,F.. o..r. 35 2.t 1 Ac L S 2.79 q bl/,c ~~ 2.10/1 .04AG ~9 200A~ I7 ~~-'• 3.08 Ac 2s s. b~0.~c 40 `/ 4S62Ac 28 2T ~ ~ r 4.93 Ac 2.36 Ac '~~ L7aAC(D) I 2.JOAc(~) 4.4 28Ac 3 Ac L~/ 12 N 4 \ •.~„ e 14 41 I 59.39 Ac(C) I ~- ./ ~• ~ 612 - 3 - 75 23 78 Ac ~~a4cQ)1 i aa,~~~ 74 f~'~' ROANOKE COUNTY d ~'~~ DEPARTMENT OF D~i~i e ~` FLOP~IENT e le STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: 30-5/88 PETITIONER: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors & Carson King Jon Hartley~,'~ DATE: May 11, 1988 Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Carson King to vacate a portion of an existing right-of-way known as Airpoint Drive, for a width of 30 to approximately 0 feet beginning at Bent Mountain Road (Route 221) and extending in an easterly direction 365 feet, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. BACKGROUND: Airpoint Drive, which is the main access to Airpoint Estates subdivision, was developed in the mid 1960's as a private road subdivision. At the time of construction, the present road was built so as to encroach on ad'oinin gravel now being upgraded through the County's 1985gRoadpBond The road is order to be incorporated into the state system. The program in proposed vacation and simultaneous acquisition are to align the right-of-way with the existing road and maintain a 50 foot right-of-way. (See attached survey plat and location map.) 1. IMPACT ON EXISTING LAND USE 2. 3. 4 Property adjoins an existing single family residence on the south side of the intersection of Airpoint Road and Route 221. The north side of the intersection is open space. The neighboring area is comprised of scattered single family residences, institutional uses and open space. The current zoning in the immediate and surrounding vicinity is A-1 Agricultural. Right-of-way vacation will not have a negative effect on existing land use. IMPACT ON FUTURE LAND USE The Comprehensive Plan designates the immediate area in the Rural Village land use category. The area west of Route 221 is in the Village Center land use category. Right-of-way vacation will not have a negative effect on future land use. IMPACT ON UTILITIES The Utility Department recommends that, since no sewer or water service is anticipated in this area, the right-of-way should be vacated without any provision for a utility easement to the County. OTHER IMPACTS Virginia Department of Transportation has no objection to the proposed vacation, since it is part of the County's 1985 Road Bond program. The County Engineering Department recommends approval conditioned upon first obtaining the necessary additional land from the adjoining owner to the north to maintain a 50 foot right-of-way. - 4 - S8 S "- ~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY RE: Vacate a portion of the ) 50 foot right-of-way on ) Airpoint Drive as recorded) FINAL ORDER in Plat Book 6, Page 46 ) ao ) ~ \ ) u i TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Roanoke County and Mr. Carson L. King did petition the Board of County Supervisors to abandon and vacate a portion of the 50 foot right-of-way located on N z Airpoint Drive in Airpoint Estates; and w 2 WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of County 0 ~ 0 Supervisors did hold a public .hearing on said request on May H ~ 24, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 w Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and a w WHEREAS, after full consideration the Board of Roanoke County Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should be approved on May 24, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that a portion of the 50 foot right-of-way, hereinabove described, as more particularly shown on a plat attached hereto, be permanently vacated and abondoned. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Department of Development and that this order be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among the land records of Roanoke County. - 5 - ACTION # PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NUMBER i A`i' A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING ON: AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code to auth- orize the increase of the law library fee to sup- port the Roanoke County/Salem Law Library COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: By ordinance adopted on March 12, 1985, the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County assessed as part of the costs incident to each civil action filed in the courts in Roanoke County a $2.00 fee. This fee is a user fee and supports the establishment, use, and maintenance of the law library in the courthouse. The law library is open for use by the public. This fee was authorized by Section 42.1-70 of the State Code. For the past several years, one goal of the County's legisla- tive program was to increase the authorized assessment. This goal was supported by the local judiciary, the local bar associa- tion, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, and others. The 1987 ses- sion of the Virginia General Assembly amended Section 42.1-70 and increased the authorized amount from $2.00 to $4.00. (Acts of Assembly 1988, Chapter 571) The Treasurer reports that for received $9,118.30 for this purpose. (through March) he received $8,233.95. Court reports that 3,648 civil actions the Code of the General District Court cases were filed in 1987. Fiscal Year 1986-87 he For Fiscal Year 1987-88 The Clerk of the Circuit were filed in 1987; and reports that 2,626 civil The Salem-Roanoke County Bar Association adopted a resolu- tion in support of this measure at its meeting on May 6, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: It is estimated that the adoption of this ordinance to increase the law library assessment from $2.00 to $4.00 would result in total revenues of $20,000--$24,000. . ~, i ~~! f PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on May 24, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMQ~IDING THE ROANOKE COLJNI'Y CODE TO INCREASE THE IMPOSI- TION OF THE LAW LIBRARY FEE TO SUPPORT THE ROANOKE COUNTY/SALIIK LAW LIBRARY All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~ 1V~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: May 10, 1988 May 17, 1988 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 --,~ PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NUMBER ~~ "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING ON: SUBJECT: r finance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Section 9-2, Article II, and Article III, "Fire Protection Code" and by the enactment of a new Article II to provide for the establishment of certain permit and inspection fees and to authorize the enforcement of same. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~n-rr~ a~~n.cS.-u-oJ~" . SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Old Code At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on August 28, 1984, the Basic Fire Prevention Code of 1981, Fifth Edition, of BOCA International, Inc, was adopted. The 1981 Fire Prevention Code is a set of regulations addressing fire and safety standards for existing buildings. The code has been accepted by local business people and has reduced the fire loss in Roanoke County. Adoption of this code was in line with State legislation. The 1981 BOCA code is strictly a maintenance code. Section 8.2-15 makes provisions for permit fees. None have been established. New Code The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is a mandatory statewide set of regulations. It was adopted by the Board of Housing and Community Development on December 14, 1987. The new code. became effective March 1, 1988. It supercedes all fire prevention regulations heretofore adopted by local governments. More restrictive amendments may be adopted if they do not affect the manner of construction or materials to be used. Ma-i o r Changes The Statewide Fire Prevention Code requires resident and employee training in certain occupancies. The areas of training are in exit drills, life safety procedures, and evacuation drills. Action Required F-102.1 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code gives the local government the option to enforce the code through the local fire marshal. The State Fire Marshal shall enforce the code in those jurisdictions that choose not to enforce the code. 9 r.[.M~ . _ ~ ~ ~' ~ x PUBLIC NCITICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on May 24, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit:. ORDINANCE AMQVDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2, "POSSESSION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS"; THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE II, "FIRE DANES"; AND THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE PR~TION CODE"; AND BY THE ENACIMEL~lT OF A NEW ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PRE- VENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMQ~T OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND INSPECTION ~~~ES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENF~RCEL~TT OF SAME All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~' 'Y ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: May 10, 1988 May 17, 1988 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 KI+N,Vt;t~~ T1;ytJ L wi/t'~L.-iVCFiJ '+ l f V is i'i C L' fC - 7 l~ ~i G J `t C.' 't K V} V l~ FC tL v l1 1, Q T Y .:ut+t{i, u~ ;iu~tilVI~urt;, .i73u C':t<rii~iCLcTii'~ :iK t' a t~uX ~`~irijil ttUr,i`vulit V~ L`t111.7 ~INT>= l+t- Vl+lvl;'V1N i, i i Y ur rtu~a~r/I<Z ~z~3.~u ,~ F- ~- i ~ ;~ v I T ~; r P i.1; i_ i, ,u '(i L v I ~ (Tht U;V~~rtJi~~VLu) kid L~Fl;cn ut- TIN~t~J-wLt:lD ~JnNt,Iti•TI~.tV~ „Hi(;ti l,i~i~- 1'tJktiTiu~v I~ t'u~lritK ui~ Ti~;_ nt;wi~~unt TI,'NtS t, ~riLttLi-,~~sr~• t~ cr+ILY I~cri~Pt+1'tK ~'UGLt~ri~-:u 1~~ Ku~+lrutt~r Iv Tt7L J1NT1= u~- ~''Iriv1y1N~ +_iu i,tKTIrY TNr~T Ttt Ni'viVCA~I ivi.;Tl~,c r~r~5 t'IJJLJt7~i jiV Jtilu +'rtnJNn}'~~j liiy Trit t=uLi.linlvi7 rtTt;> ~%~/1vltsts i~utZiVli~iv u~/I7/~a i~Ut~fitiitd„ rii It~~J~, its ~ uKY ur ~'rY i9irc l:t-~It,cn'J JLV"tiNjlJ~tCt_' Please be Bedvised I hat the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at Its meet-! Ing on MaY 24, 19Bt, sf the Roanoke County gdmtnistra- tlon Cenfer, 3738 Bramblsfon Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, st the evening session beginning 7.00 P. m. will hold a Dublle hearing on the followlnD mat- ter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMENDING; CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PRE-' VENTION AND PROTEC- TION," OF THE ROANOKE ~ COUNTY CODE BY REPEAL- j iNG SECTION 9-$ "POSSES- SION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS"; THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE 11, "FIRE LANES"; qND THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE"; AND BY THE EN- ACTMENT OF q NEW ARTI- CLE 11, "VIRGINIA STATE- WIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND IN- SPECTION FEES, qND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCE- MENT OF SAME All members of fhe public Infer- esfed In the matter set fprth above may appear and be heard et fhe time and place aforesaid, Paul M. Mahoney County gttorney of RoanokeCountY, Virginia ( 204p4-- ~---_ --- -~ PUBLIC HEARING ACTION # ITEM NUMBER _~© S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING ON: AGENDA ITEM: r finance o increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursu- ant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRA,~TO,R' S /COMMENTS : f ~~,,~~~~ ®~~',,nrn,,c~ ~1`~dnd-~-~ . ~ GC~~wv~~l` ~ `ter ` "" ~`- " ~~~~ ~. RAC`KI;R(1i1Nll~ Last year on May 6, 1987, the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-- 46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia. This section of the State Code and Section 3.07 of the County Charter require that any increase in supervisor's salaries be accomplished by ordinance after pub- lic hearing between May 1 and June 30. Any increase is limited to an annual five (5%) percent inflation factor. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of this proposed ordinance is scheduled for May 24, 1988; the second reading is scheduled for June 14, 1988. The required public hearing on this matter is scheduled for May 24, 1988. The proposed salary for Board members will be increased from $7,987 to $8,386. In addition, this ordinance establishes the additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at $1,800 and Vice Chairman at $]_,200. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Five (50) percent increase in Board salaries: ($399 each x 5 = $1,995) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. ~ ~~ PUBLIC NdIICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on May 24, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF NIIE1~'1BE~S OF THE BOARD OF SUPER- VISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AN~IDED All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: May 10, 1988 May 17, 1988 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 KI,;IivUl~C 7 Ii1a=J L itii,t'~LL'-i`rLV~J i+t1 YllNCLtt - >iyGCyL~ vUJ.rSv t<UHItiUt'lC (.. i.UIV) Y lit,KU ut- Jv#'triV~J~K ~i73zs ~tir:~~l~~tT~'v ~;n ~ l: i:iiii 1yUli~ i< ii r1 ~ ~ti ~ t« l~ ti ~ 4 U i ~r;;T~ u~ vt~~I+vli i. T TY ~~ ttt~r~ttiuftt AF-rIu>~VIT Wit- r~uLlLr,l uid i • I The ~IVi;~n~I~Vcu) ~iV uf=t=it,~~ u~= 1It>;tJ-nC:KLtJ l.itC~Ln~Tii.i~f Yvtlii,rt l.uK- t"vt{ri~ ~i.iV iJ ~u;Ll:iti~h i. f' T1-i~ ttl,Hi'.utCL TI~u~,i t, ~i,r~Lt,-+r~_wJ~ ti tJHILY hLw:iPH)%cr; t'u~Ll~ri~u iv rtuH~;un~9 Irv Tr, 1= ~T~T~ ur VIt~vIiVIH9 ul. I.tKT irY T>7~, 1 Trtc n;v~v~ntC r'~LJTII._ hMJ ivUlJi..I.JY1Cii III, JNliJ ~v~nJr'~~'LriJ ui1; Tt~c rul_LuwlivV uHTcJ U5/iJ/Gt1 iauKtdl!`v G~~17~~~ Nl.1f~iliiYl~ r+I )iVc~J~ TN ~i L;r~Y~u~a^_~M~;l' iyL~; l,t'~ll.tt(s.> J1l~i~rfT "f~C PUBLIC NOTICE please be advised thst the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, st its meet- Inp on May Y4, 19Bi, at fhe Roanoke County Adminisfra- tlon CeMsr, 3730 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning 7:00 D. m. will hold a public hearing on the following mat- ter, fo-wit: ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE- SALARIES OF MEM- BERS OF THE BOARD OF SU- PERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHAR- TER AND SECTION 14.1- 16.01:1 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED. All members of fhe Dubllc inter- ested In fhe matter set forth above may appear end be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Vlrpinls (T2926) ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: May 24, 1988 Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursu- ant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Last year on May 6, 1987, the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-- 46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia. This section of the State Code and Section 3.07 of the County Charter require that any increase in supervisor's salaries be accomplished by ordinance after pub- lic hearing between May 1 and June 30. Any increase is limited to an annual five (5%) percent inflation factor. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of this proposed ordinance is scheduled for May 24, 1988; the second reading is scheduled for June 14, 1988. The required public hearing on this matter is scheduled for May 24, 1988. The proposed salary for Board members will be increased from $7,987 to $8,386. In addition, this ordinance establishes the additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at $1,800 and Vice Chairman at $1,200. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Five (50) percent increase in Board salaries: ($399 each x 5 = $1,995) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. -. ~/ Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~r~~U~~~ Pau M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE KOANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter for the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir- ginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $7,987 by Ordinance No. 6987-7, and further, has established the additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board to be $1,800 and for the Vice Chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla- tion factor not to exceed five (50) percent; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of these salaries was held on May 24, 1988; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 24, 1988; the second reading was held on June 14, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries ~~ of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virgin- ia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five (5%) per- cent pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section l~.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir- ginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $8,386 for members of the Board. Tn addition, the Chairman of the Board will receive an additional. annual sum of $1,800 and the Vice Chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1988. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -.Z. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: May 24, 1988 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code to auth- orize the increase of the law library fee to sup- port the Roanoke County/Salem Law Library COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: By ordinance adopted on March 12, 1985, the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County assessed as part of the costs incident to each civil action filed in the courts in Roanoke County a $2.00 fee. This fee is a user fee and supports the establishment, use, and maintenance of the law library in the courthouse. The law library is open for use by the public. This fee was authorized by Section 42.1-70 of the State Code. For the past several years, one goal of the County's legisla- tive program was to increase the authorized assessment. This goal was supported by the local judiciary, the local bar associa- tion, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, and others. The 1987 ses- sion of the Virginia General Assembly amended Section 42.1-70 and increased the authorized amount from $2.00 to $4.00. (Acts of Assembly 1988, Chapter 571) The Treasurer reports that for received $9,118.30 for this purpose. (through March) he received $8,233.95. Court reports that 3,648 civil actions the Code of the General District Court cases were filed in 1987. Fiscal Year 1986-87 he For Fiscal Year 1987-88 The Clerk of the Circuit were filed in 1987; and reports that 2,626 civil The Salem-Roanoke County Bar Association adopted a resolu- tion in support of this measure at its meeting on May 6, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: It is estimated that the adoption of this ordinance to increase the law library assessment from $2.00 to $4.00 would result in total revenues of $20,000--$24,000. ,~~,s. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adop- tion of the proposed ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~; ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ,~„ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A'i"I'HE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE INCREASE OF THE LAW LIBRARY FEE TO SUPPORT THE ROANOKE COUNTY/SALEM LAW LIBRARY WHEREAS, by Ordinance adopted March 12, 1985, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, imposed an assessment for law libraries as part of the costs incident to each civil action filed in the courts within its boundaries in the amount of $2.00; and WHEREAS, Section 42.1-70 of the 1950 Code of Virginia was amended during the 1988 session of the Virginia General Assembly authorizing an increase of this fee to $4.00 per civil case filed with the clerks of the various courts to pay the costs of maintenance, upkeep, and improvements of the law library; and WHEREAS, the $4.00 filing fee assessed against parties filing civil cases is equitable and just in that it places the cost of maintaining the law library upon those who precipitate litigation; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on May 24, 1988; the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this ordinance amends and reenacts the ordin- ance adopted on March 12, 1985, and pursuant to the authority found in Section 42.1-70 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as r 4. That a certified copy of this ordinance be for- warded to the chief judges and clerks of the courts serving Roanoke County, the Treasurer of Roanoke County, the Treasurer of the City of Salem, and the Roanoke County/Salem Bar Association. ACTION # I~'~;M NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the purchase of the remain- der of the Reynolds property/Spring Hollow Reser- voir COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: !/ BACKGROUND: Roanoke County v. Reynolds, et al., concerns the proposed condemnation of 157.89 acres of real estate for the Spring Hollow Reservoir and was authorized by Resolution No. 84-229 duly adopted on December 18, 1984, after a public hearing. The parties continued to negotiate the issues and-,aeveral offers and counter-offers were made. On September 22, 1987, the Board approved an offer from the owners/defendants to resolve the pending litigation. This offer consisted of the payment of $105,000 and the provision of reason- able and appropriate access to the remainder the owners' property. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As previously stated in addition to the monetary settlement the County agreed to provide a permanent access to the remainder of the property retained by the owners/defendants. The County agreed to provide the owners/defendants with essentially the same type and quality of access that they currently possess, i.e. a right-of-way 40 feet wide or less; however, the owners/defendants insisted upon a better means of access to the remainder property. Upon further consideration and negotiations, staff has deter- mined it would be more economically feasible to purchase the re- mainder property from the owners/defendants than to provide the type of access which they are demanding. Further, this purchase will allow the County to exclusively possess the entire tract on which the dam would be situated. On May 10, 1988, the Board in executive session considered an offer to purchase the remainder consisting of 83 acres from the owners/defendants for $40,000 (in addition to the $105,000 previously agreed on to purchase the 157.89-acre tract.) ~"' ~} Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein be accomp- lished only by ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on May 24, 1988; the second reading was held on June 14, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Upon the commencement of Roanoke County vs. Reynolds, et al., the County deposited with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County the sum of $86,000. The balance of $19,000 neces- sary to resolve the litigation was to be obtained from the funds reserved and carried over for this purpose from Fiscal Year 1986- 87. The remaining balance of $40,000 is available in the Spring Hollow Reservoir Account--No. 96-6-60196-0. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu- ments and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transaction, upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transaction. Respectfully submitted, ~-^ Y ~,^ Yaul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE ~ f No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~- ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF THE REMAINDER OF THE REYNOLDS PROPERTY/ SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi- tion of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on May 24, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on June 14, 1988. This real estate consists of 83 acres, more particularly des- cribed as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 72.00-1-1, west of Salem adjacent to the property owned by Roanoke County as the future location of Spring Hollow Reservoir; and 2. That the 83 acres of real estate from Harold D. Reynolds, et al., to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for $40,000 is hereby authorized and approved; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ` - 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Fiscal Year 1988-89 Budget Appropriation Ordinance COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~i: -~ -~ 9-~ /Yz~i BACKGROUND: The 1988-89 fiscal year budget was presented to the Board of Supervisors by the County Administrator on April 12, 1988. Budget public hearings were held on January 26, 1988 and April 26, 1988 to receive written and oral comment from the public concering the proposed annual budget. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached for your approval is the 1988-89 Fiscal Year Budget Appropriation Ordinance. The total County budget is $138,978,840. This includes all interfund transfers. The budget net of interfund transfers is $105,590,644. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The first reading of the appropriation ordinance was held on May 24, 1988. Staff recommends adoption of the 1988-89 Fiscal Year Budget Appropriation Ordinance after the second reading on June 14, 1988. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management and Budget County Administrator P-y Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( > Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, May 24, 1988 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on April 26, 1988, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1988-1989; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on May 24, 1988, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 24, 1988, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1988, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1988, and ending June 30, 1989, for the functions and purposes indicated: F.EVENUES: 56,270,796 GENERAL FUND 5,384,542 DEBT FUND 866,699 CAPITAL FUND UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 ~ 318,716 YOUTH HAVEN II RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND 183,159 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 1,009,074 7'772'362 UTILITY FUND 353 92 OFFSITE FACILITY FUND-WATER , OFFSITE FACILITY FUND-SEWER 197,95b 226,826 GARAGE FUND 155,722 55 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND , SCHOOL BUS FUND 1,125,000 SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND 2,564,812 SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,151,011 SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 535,000 SCHOOL LITERARY FUND 2,981,000 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 425,633 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 678,159 TOTAL REVENUES ALL FUNDS 138,978,840 ------------- PERSON!~EL ------------- OPERATING ----------- CAPITAL ------ ------------- TRAFSFERS ------------- ------- TOTAL -------- CEt~TRAL ACCOU:`~TING ------------- 19b,856 --=---------- 90,496 ----- 28~,35Z PAYROLL 50,647 14,570 1,570 65,:'87 PUBLIC TP.ANSPORTATION 60,000 6C,000 253 88 MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 71,613 16,640 , 380 108 1 RISK MAMA^vEMENT 1,108,380 100 , , 207,E81 PROCUREMENT SEPVICES 167,690 40,091 FIP,E ADMINISTRATION 66,397 39,225 105,622 FIRE SUPPRESSION 726,203 253,578 333,500 104,781 1,418,062 FIRE PREVENTION 90,435 6,800 11,800 109,035 TRAINING 29,692 38,105 9,700 77,497 TECHNICAL SERVICES 55,532 148,356 2,500 206,389 PLANNING AND RESEAP,CH 33,088 2,455 35,543 RESCUE SQUAD 638 235 49,010 a ~ '18.,6:8 OPERATIONS EMS SERVICES 190,698 , 9,075 199,773 EMERGENCY SERVICES ~6 772 PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 22,272 4,500 420 18 HAZARDOUS N,ATERIALS 17,420 1,000 , ASST CO ADMIN-COMMUNITY SVCS 602 101 604 20 200 (18,200) 104,206 MANAGEMENT SOLID HASTE , 793,746 , 482,854 288,741 97,971 1,663,312 STREET LIGHTING 96,116 96,116 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 202,785 18,732 12,750 (92,916) 14:,349 DRAFTING & RECORDS 68,828 8,064 (37,864) 39,026 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 104,796 11,124 15,000 (54,980) 75,940 DRAINAGE 46,431 30,650 122,919 200,000 ROADWAY 40,025 4,700 44,725 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 410,271 5'18,926 24,075 963,272 PLANNING & ZONING 225 89 503 36 175 125,903 ADMINISTRATION , , 114 96 CURRENT PLANNING AND OPER 94,864 3,250 , 254 35 SPECIAL PROJECTS 33,754 1,500 , 000 23 ZONING ORDINANCE 23,000 , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW " 101 64 PERMITS 62,016 ',C85 , 327 45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 43,927 1,400 , G3 ; " PLANNING COt?MiSSION 15,233 2,7G0 , ~ CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES 763 54 ADMINISTRATION 31,763 7,000 , INSPECTIONS 141,189 21,753 162,942 ASST CO ADMIN-HUMAN SERVICES 60,825 22,055 iG2,B8G GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GROUNDS Y,AINTENANCE 574,565 233,764 19,000 827,329 LEAF COLLECTION 26,150 26,150 STREET SIGNS 4,200 4,200 PAP,k;S AND RECP,EATION 296 56 COMMUNITY EDUCATION 54,796 1,500 , LEISURE ACTIVITIES 91,660 1,000 92,660 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 25,549 3,500 30,049 SENIOR CITIZENS 78,292 3,850 82,142 2. That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. That the County Administrator may transfer up to $10,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contingency account encompassed in the Non-Departmental appropriation. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1988, are reappropriated to the 1988-89 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1988, and appropriations in the 1988-89 budget. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER __~------'- OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOENTER THE BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION NTY~, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COU May 12_g of 2nY ~ 1988 MEETING DATE: readopting Section amending and Ado tion of state law ITEM: Ordinancl of Chapter 12, AGENDA Article COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,, ~,~-~_ J ^ ..N.e.,,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ INFORMATION= Court judge dismissed SUMMARY OF been re- District the County Code had the General a substitute General Recently the basis that amendments by ~lhe any of Virginia. a DUI warrant t ke into account of the Code Hanover_ and 18.2 of Mitchell ~• codified tO Titles 46.1 the case ordin- Assembly t° relief upon Hanover Countafter it .S lawyer 1986) which involved athe Code even defendant of The Va. App• 486 ( to Title 18.1 Count referre$ 2 adopted by the General d~denotyanswer ance which still ecifically rovide Baled and Title 1 case sP Can lawfully P re eals in the Mit___chell ordinance the Virginia was of App a local amendments to ttor- Court of whetheof prospective the question oration and the Commonwealth's at pre- for the incorp this office ens decision, DUI Although both wisdom of the judg not to write es Code- uestion the under instruction time as our judg ney~s office ~ gistrates are Until such incor- County Code. ermits prospective resent sent Citing the County 46 1_188 p the p warrants that Sec th°n quickest way to remove and reempha- can be convinced this section by the poration of amendme12s8 is to recodify all amendments Section to incorporate time. cloud over included to this size that it is are effective uP General Assembly which FISCAL IMPACTS: will permit the It 10,000 per approximately $ to continue to collect up to County. month in fines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt these ordinance amendments. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney -------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 `~ ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING (~i SECTION 12-8 OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of section 46.1-188 of the Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state contained in title 46.1 and in article 2 (sec- tion 18.2-266 et seq.) of chapter 7 of title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those provisions and requirements the violation of which constitutes a felony, and except those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can have no application to or within the county, are hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the county. References to "highways of the state contained in such provi- sions and requirements hereby adopted ,s hall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways and other public ways within the county. Such provisions and requirements, as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person within the county to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; pro- vided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the viola- tion of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all amendments to said laws made effective prior to the date that this ordinance is adopted. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shal]_ be May 25, 1988. S pF RpANOKE RD pF SUPENTYS A MINISTRATIpN STING ~~ TH THE RpAMA E 24pU 19g8 HELD A UESDAY r G AND CENTER r pN T 11 AME TICLE I pF N AN ~ E CTI~N i2- ARE CpUNTY CODE ors of Roanoke R AD YTI12 OF THE ROAN and °£ SuPervis pIiAYTER the B ° icle IT pRDAINED by f state law r Art b e BE niar as Poll°ws: 2_8 r 1''d° tion ° s and Traffic ,OUntY' Virgi That Section 1 Motor Vehicle lows: 12- 1 • r e s fo eral r of phaPte ead and Px°vid a I r In Gennd ~eadoPted to fate Law . 46 •1_1g8 of the amended a tion °f s section °f the 12_g • P'a°p autholitY °f requirements . Cle 2 SeC• rsuant to the ~ovisions and ,1 and in anti pod Pu tine P 46 e e e th i~ginj,ar all °f dined in titl title la•2 °f is the p°de °f V he state coat of ChaPte ~ of and requi~emen th°se laws of t 6 et seq.l ovisi°ns d except section 1g .2'26 ce°t th°se Pz s a felony r an aturer Can have C f Virginia r eX ch C°nstitute by their very n adopted and 0 of whi whiChr hereby ble violati°n and requirements the C°untY r die and made aPPlica te~~ Pr°visi°ns . on to °~ within er by reference ways °f the std ted no aPPlicati this chaPt s to ~~high he~ebY ad°P r orated in Reference e uirements and other inC° P the County • ovisions and r gets r highways ui~ementsr within in such pz the stye s and req i contained ed to refer to such Provision d and made a Par shall be deem ithin the C°untY• re hereby adoPte at length herein ublic ways w me to timer a h set forth he county p fr ti oug h t as amended om as ~ul1Y as th Person Wit in With any s~ f this chapter unlaW ful for any fuse to C°mplY ana it shall be 1r neglect °~ ~e or f ai violate provision or requirement; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all amendments to said laws made effective prior to the date that this ordinance is adopted. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be May 25, 1988. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~.~> ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Francis W. Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney General District Court Judges General District Court Clerk Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke, 24016 Main Library Ordinance File Roanoke County Code Book A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the-rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS : /~3 ~~ ~~_ ~l •~ „~P.~~,/ GQ~it E- PHONE : ~~~~~- ~~~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ITEM NUMBER ~ --- AT A REGULAR MEETING Or' `1..'IiT BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOICE , VA . , ON OF' SUPERVISORS OF ROANUKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTi?1-; 'T'UESDAY , MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Ordi.nanc;e No. 2988-6 authorizing the lease of approximately five (5) acres in the Hollins/ Old Mountain Road area by the County of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of Supervisors authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres located i.n the Ilollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand for recrea- tional purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6). The term of the lease was for a twenty-five (25) year period. Steve Goldfarb, a representai~ive of Ingersoll-Rand, re- quested that the term of the lease be reduced to a three (3) year renewable period to allow for plant expansion which may occur within the next twenty-five years. Specifically, the term of the lease will be three (3) years and it will be expressly agreed between Ingersoll-Rand. and Roanoke County that the leased pre- mises shall be utilized for_ recreational purposes. Roanoke County will locate one baseball/softball field with backstop and team benches. Access to the tract will be from Old Mountain Road and off-street parking will be located adjacent to the ball.fi.eld. During the term of the lease maintenance of the premises wi_11_ be the responsibility of Roanoke County; however, routine cleanup will be the responsibility of the u.~ng party. Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that the acqui- sition oL any interest in .real estal.e be acromplishcd by ordin- ance. The first reading of this proposed ordinan~.e was Y:el..d o~~ May .10, 1988; the second reading wil:1 be hold May 24, 19f38. FISCAL IMPACT: $1.00 per year plus costs of and i.mpr.ovements made by F',oa-- noke County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendation: _ 1. That the Board of Supei-vi.sors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. 2. That the County Administrator be authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to acr_.ompl.i.sh this transaction, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. hespectfully submitted, ~`rti~ `1''~, ~~~ ~ - - Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT I ON VO'1'~ Approved ( ) M t-'on b No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To o .i y. Garrett ____ Johnson __ McGraw ___ __ _ Nickens --- __ --- Robers w ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF '.CHE BOARD OI' SUPERVISORS OF ROANOK:I~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT Z'HE ROAPJOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, O[J 'TUESDAY, C-TAY 24, 1988 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2988-6 AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) ACRES IN THE HOLLINS/OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD AREA BY 'THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FROM INGERSOLL RAND FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That at the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of Supervisors authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes (Or.dinance No. 2988-6). The term of the lease was for_ a twenty-five (25) year period; and 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby amends Ordin- ance No. 2988-6 adopted February 9, 1988; and 3. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning tide amend- ment of the lease of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on May 10, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on May 24, 1988. This real estate is located in the Hollins/O]_d Mountain Road area of Roanoke County; and 4. That the lease by Roanoke County from ingersoll Rand of approximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area of Roanoke County for recreational purposes i_s hereby authorized and approved; and 5. That the annual lease amount or rental. shall be $1.00; and that the term of this lease shall be for a three ( 3 ) year renewable term; and .. ~ ~ " 6. That the County 1ldminist.rator is authorized t,o F~;~f-:~-- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 ORDINANCE 52488-12 AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 2988-6 AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) ACRES IN THE HOLLINS/OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD AREA BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FROM INGERSOLL RAND FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That at the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of Supervisors authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6). The term of the lease was for a twenty-five (25) year period; and 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby amends Ordin- ance No. 2988-6 adopted February 9, 1988; and 3. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the amend- ment of the lease of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on May 10, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on May 24, 1988. This real estate is located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area of Roanoke County; and 4. That the lease by Roanoke County from Ingersoll Rand of approximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area of Roanoke County for recreational purposes is hereby authorized and approved; and 5. That the annual lease amount or rental shall be $1.00; and that the term of this lease shall be for a three (3) year renewable term; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: Stephen H. Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Gardner W. Smith, Director, General Services John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Francis W. Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library. 315 Church AVenue, SW, Rke, 24016 Main Library Ordinance File Roanoke County Code Book ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Section 9-2, Article II, and Article III, "Fire Protection Code" and by the enactment of a new Article II to provide for the establishment of certain permit and inspection fees and to authorize the enforcement of same. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~G'~~~ ~~~z~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Old Code At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on August 28, 1984, the Basic Fire Prevention Code of 1981, Fifth Edition, of BOCA International, Inc. was adopted. The 1981 Fire Prevention Code is a set of regulations addressing fire and safety standards for existing buildings. The code has been accepted by local business people and has reduced the fire loss in Roanoke County. Adoption of this code was in line with State legislation. The 1981 BOCA code is strictly a maintenance code. Section 8.2-15 makes provisions for permit fees. None have been established. New Code The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is a mandatory statewide set of regulations. It was adopted by the Board of Housing and Community Development on December 14, 1987. The new code became effective March 1, 1988. It supercedes all fire prevention regulations heretofore adopted by local governments. More restrictive amendments may be adopted if they do not affect the manner of construction or materials to be used. Maior Changes The Statewide Fire Prevention Code requires resident and employee training in certain occupancies. The areas of training are in exit drills, life safety procedures, and evacuation drills. Action Required F-102.1 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code gives the local government the option to enforce the code through the local fire marshal. The State Fire Marshal shall enforce the code in those jurisdictions that choose not to enforce the code. FISCAL IMPACT The permit process can be administered with existing personnel. Fire company personnel can be utilized in this program. The funds generated by the permit process and fire lane tickets will be assessed at a later date. The need for additional personnel will be addressed at that time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Option I 1. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors charge the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County with enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. 2. Staff further recommends that a $25 permit fee be imposed for each of the 32 areas so addressed in the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The permit process is to be administered as outlined by Section F-104 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Option II 1. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors charge the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County with enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. 2. No fee be imposed. Staff recommends Option I. The first reading of the ordinance was held on May 10, 1988. Staff recommends approval and adoption of the ordinance following the second reading on May 24, 1988. SUBMITTED BY: K. R. Sh rp~ Fire Marshal APPROVED: ~ _ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Garrett ~_ __._, Johnson McGraw __ Nickens '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2, "POSSESSION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS, THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE,"; AND BY THE ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF SAME. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code, "Possession, sale, discharge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 3. That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 4. That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as follows: Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke County shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as written with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Cede was adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community L~ -3 Development and said Board promulgated certain regulations and procedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this Code. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is incorporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length herein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the Fire Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be referred to as such or as this Code. Section 2. The purposes of this Code are to provide for statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard life and property from the hazards of fire or explosion aris.iny from the improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention and protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and the unsafe storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, and devices wherever located. Section 3. The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby directed to enforce the pro~~isions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall. establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for the administration and enforcement of said Code. Tree County Fire Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordinate his enforcement activities with the County Building Official and Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and detail such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code. L Q-3 Section 4. There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five Dollar ($25) fee for all permits issued pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Any permit issued shall be by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance steal].. not be applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton. Section 6. That the Virginia Statewide F'i.re Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section 27-97 of the Code of Virginia in the following respects: 1. F-102.1 Enforcement officers. Add the following at the end of the existing subsection F.102.1: The provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this Code shall be enforced_by the Office of the Fire Marshal, also herein r_eferreci__ to as the Fire Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal, ___ members of the Fire Marshal's staff, the Fire _ Prevention Division, or the Fire Official. 2. F-102.1.1 Inspection by otheL•s. Add subsection F-102.1,1 as follows: The Chief of the Fire Department may des]~nate such other persons as he deems necessa~ to make fire__ safety inspections. Such persons shall use the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this _ Code as the basis for _such irlspections.___ 3. F-102.1.2 Impersonation. Add subsection F-102.1.2 as follows: J `~ It shall be unl_awfu I_ for _a~ unauthorized person to_ use a badge L_ l.ar~_i,{_orm or ~~riy other credentials so as to gain access _ _to any__ building, marine vessel~__ vehicle, or____~remisesL _or to otherwise falsely__ identify himse_lt as__th~ fire official. or _hi_s designated r~resent.at_ive. 4. F-103.4 Investigation of fires. Add subsection F-103.4 as follows: The Fire Marshal shall investigate or_cause to be investigatedL ever~_fire _or ex losion___occurrnca within the County that is of a suspicious nature or"__ which involves the loss of life or causes__inju~to_ persons or. causes destruction o.E or darna_ye__ to property. Such investigation shall be made at__the_ time of the fire or at a subsequent time, depending on the nature and cirr..umstances of the fire. The Fire Marshal shall take charge immediate~_of the_ physical evidence and, in order_ to preserve _ar~y__ physical evidence relating to the cause or oriain_of_ such fire or explosion, take means to prevent access by any person or persons to such_ _buil_di;z~, _ structure, or premises until such evidence has__been properly processed. 5. F-103 .4 . 1 Summonsing the Fire Mar_shf.~ 1.. F~dd subsection F-103.4.1 as follows: The fire department officer-in=charge of any___fire1_ explosion or incident. scene shall immediately _ 4 q -.~ summons the Fire Marshal to such sr,ene to investigate the circumstances involved where such circumstances re uire investigation as outlined in_ .-. ~ n -i n _ r i_ t_ _ ~ i-. . ,7 .-. 6. F-103.5 Modifications. Add the subsection F-103.5 as follows: The fire official shall have the power to modify the application of this Code, upon written request b~_ the owner, lessee, occupant or their legal representative, when there is practical difficulty in meeting the strict letter of the Code. However, in all cases of modification, the spirit and intent_ of the Code shall be met to ensure the health~_ safety and welfare of~ersons is protected_ 7. F-103.6 Notification of fire d~artment. Add subsection F-103.6 as :follows: In any building subject to inspection under provision of this Code, when a fire or evidence of there having been a fire discovered, even though_it has apparently been extinqu.ished, it shal]_ be immediately reported to the Chief of the fire department, or his designee. This shall be the duty of the owner, mane or person in control of such building at the time of discovery. This recLirement_ shall not be construed to _forbid 'the owner, manager~_ or person in control of_said bui.ldinq__from usin all 5 Q-3 diligence necessary to__extinguish such fire prior to the arrival of the fire department. 8. F-201.0 Applied Meaning of Words and Terms: Add to section F-201.0 the following words, terms and meanings: Fire Lanes: An area designated~_clearly visible signs in which_parking shall. be prohibiter whether__ on public or private property, to ensure .ready access for and to fire fighting and rescue equi~ment_ and facilities. 9. F-303.0 Torches for the Removal of Paint. Add the following words to the title: or Sweating Pipe Joints. 10. F-303.3 Sweating Joints. Add the following subsection F-303.3: Any person usin~c _ a torch or other flame_~roduci.nc~__ device for sweating pipe~'oints^in andbuilding or _ structure shall have available in the immF_~diate vicinity where the sweating is done one (1)_ap~r.oved fire extinguisher or water hose ronr~ected to a water_ supply. Combustible material in close proximity to the work shall be protected against i~~ition ~_ shielding, wetting or other approved means. In_all cases, a fire watch shall remain .in thF~ vic.inity_of_ the sweating operation for one-half (1./2) hour after the torch or flame producing device has been used. 6 4 -~ 11. F-303.3.1 Permit iZequir_ed. Add subsection F-303.3.1 as fo]_ ows: A permit sha_1.1__bP o}?ta_.i.ned from the fire o:Eficial prior to usin~__a_torch__or other flame producinq_ device for sweatn~__ppe joints in any building __or _ _~Y.......~..~... 12. F-313.1 Desi~ation. Delete and substitute as followa: Tl~e- eerie- e€€ieial- s}~all- rec~ui-te- and- deaigr~ate pr~bli-e-er-pri-mate-f lre-lanes-as-deemed-.neeessar~y-- €er t}~e- ef~i_e~ent- arrd- of€eetfi~e- rise- e€- €~re- apparate~s- Fire- 1ane5- s}~all- }gave- a- xr~ni-rnr~rn- jai-dt}~- ef- 18- €eet {5486-~+rn}- The f ir. e off icia.l sha.ll_ designate _f ire lanes on public streets and on__privat.e____~~r_ty_wher_e_ necessaryfor the purpose _ of ~r event.i_nc~ _pa_rl.in~ ~ n front of or ad~acent_ to fire hyd.r. ants__and_ f i_r._e _ d~artment connections and to ensure accf~>as t~~ buildinc~s_ and__structures _ for f. :ire Ci_g'r~ting __and rescue apparatus. _Fire lanes shall_ have__a_ minimum _ width of 18 feet (5486 mm) . 13. F-313.4 Sys and Marking. A~3d section F-313.4 as follows: The property owner _or designee sha)_L__ ~:u~i 1y and_ install_ suns _and_ other re uired_ m:~rkings___to _ delineate fire Lanes as directed by the firF~~ 7 Q -3 14. F-313.5 Speci_ficati_ons. Add section F-313.5 as follows: Fire lanes shall conform to the fo]_lowing specifications: (A) The design of such_signs shall conform to the state manual on uniJ_orm traffic-control devices and shall include the language "No Parking-Fire (B) Signs designating fire lanes shall_be located so as to provide at least one sign for___ever~ one hundred (100 ) feet of f ire lane space .___ Shou]..d the fire marshaJ_ determine that. additional signs are necessary, the owner or__ agent of the property shall provide the same. All such Signs shall be maintained in groper position and sufficient_l_y J_egibl.e_to be seen bY_ an ordinarily observant person. (C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows: (1) Pave edge to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than 10' Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (2) Curb face to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 1' nor mo.r.e than 3'. Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (3) Pavement top to sign bottom: Rural: 5' 8 Urban: 7' (4) Curb top tc sign bottom: Rural: 5' Urban: 7' 15. (D) Posts for._fire lane signs, where re wired, shall be metal and securely mounted. (E) The curb or pavement edge of all fire lanes shall be painted yellow _ Any existing marking in the area designated as a fire lane shall be obliterated or painted over in a manner approved by the fire marshal. F-313.6 Where fire lanes are designated_at fire hydrant locations. The followin~__shall_ apply where fire lanes are established at fire hydrarzt locations: (1) Where hydr_ants_are_ located_at or_close_to the curb line or edge of___the road and face on__ a__ public street, a public parkinr~_ lot or a private road open to the~ublic, parkinc~_ within fifteen (15) feet is prohibited. (2) A spec.ial_ curb marking designated areas established pursuant to (1) above, shall be required and shall be yellow. (3) No planting, erection or other obstruction shall be allowed within four (4) feet of the fire hvdrant. 9 • ~~ (4) All hyclrants___sr~a1_] __ be painted in accordance with standards e:~,t_~blished by the F'_re Marshal. 5. The provisions of i..h:, ordinance shal.l_ be effective from and after June 1, 1988. 10 i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988. ORDINANCE 52488-13 AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2, "POSSESSION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS," THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE,"; AND BY THE ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF SAME. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code, "Possession, sale, discharge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 3. That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its entirety. 4. That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as follows: Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke County shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as written with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Code was adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community Development and said Board promulgated certain regulations and procedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this Code. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is incorporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length herein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the Fire Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be referred to as such or as this Code. Section 2. The purposes of this Code are to provide for statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard life and property from the hazards of fire or explosion arising from the improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention and protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and the unsafe storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, and devices wherever located. Section 3. The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for the administration and enforcement of said Code. The County Fire Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordinate his enforcement activities with the County Building Official and Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and detail such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code. 2 Section 4. There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five Dollar ($25) fee for all permits issued pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Any permit issued shall be by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton. Section 6. That the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section 27-97 of the Code of Virginia in the following respects: 1. F-102.1 Enforcement officers. Add the following at the end of the existing subsection F.102.1: The provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this Code shall be enforced by the Office of the Fire Marshal, also herein referred to as the Fire Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal, members of the Fire Marshal's staff, the Fire Prevention Division, or the Fire Official. 2. F-102.1.1 Inspection by others. Add subsection F-102.1.1 as follows: The Chief of the Fire Department may designate such other persons as he deems necessary to make fire safety inspections. Such persons shall use the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this Code as the basis for such inspections. 3. F-102.1.2 Impersonation. Add subsection F-102.1.2 as follows: 3 It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized person to use a badge, uniform or any other credentials so as to gain access to any building, marine vessel, vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise falsely identify himself as the fire official or his designated representative. 4. F-103.4 Investigation of fires. Add subsection F-103.4 as follows: The Fire Marshal shall investigate or cause to be investigated, every fire or explosion occurring within the County that is of a suspicious nature or which involves the loss of life or causes injury to persons or causes destruction of or damage to property. Such investigation shall be made at the time of the fire or at a subsequent time, depending on the nature and circumstances of the fire. The Fire Marshal shall take charge immediately of the physical evidence and, in order to preserve any physical evidence relating to the cause or origin of such fire or explosion, take means to prevent access by any person or persons to such building, structure, or premises until such evidence has been properly processed. 5. F-103.4.1 Summonsing the Fire Marshal. Add subsection F-103.4.1 as follows: The fire de artment officer-in-charge of any fire, explosion or incident scene shall immediately 4 summons the Fire Marshal to such scene to investigate the circumstances involved where such circumstances require investigation as outlined in F-103.4 of this Code. 6. F-103.5 Modifications. Add the subsection F-103.5 as follows: The fire official shall have the power to modify the application of this Code, upon written request by the owner, lessee, occupant or their legal representative, when there is practical difficulty in meeting the strict letter of the Code. However, in all cases of modification, the spirit and intent of the Code shall be met to ensure the health, safety and welfare of persons is protected. 7. F-103.6 Notification of fire department. Add subsection F-103.6 as follows: In anv building subiect to inspection under an provision of this Code, when a fire or evidence of there having been a fire discovered, even though it has apparently been extinguished, it shall be immediately reported to the Chief of the fire department, or his designee. This shall be the duty of the owner, manager, or person in control of such building at the time of discovery. This requirement shall not be construed to forbid the owner, manager, or person in control of said building from using all 5 diligence necessary to extinguish such fire prior to the arrival of the fire department. 8. F-201.0 Applied Meaning of Words and Terms: Add to section F-201.0 the following words, terms and meanings: Fire Lanes: An area designated by clearly visible signs in which parking shall be prohibited, whether on public or private property, to ensure ready access for and to fire fighting and rescue equipment and facilities. 9. F-303.0 Torches for the Removal of Paint. Add the following words to the title: or Sweating Pipe Joints. 10. F-303.3 Sweating Joints. Add the following subsection F-303.3: Any person using a torch or other flame producing device for sweating pipe joints in any building or structure shall have available in the immediate vicinity where the sweating is done one (1) approved fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a water suQply. Combustible material in close proximity to the work shall be protected against ignition by shielding, wetting or other approved means. In all cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of the sweating operation for one-half (1/2) hour after the torch or flame producing device has been used. 6 11. F-303.3.1 Permit Required. Add subsection F-303.3.1 as follows: A permit shall be obtained from the fire official prior to using a torch or other flame producing device for sweating pipe joints in any building or structure. 12. F-313.1 Designation. Delete and substitute as follows: 'Pl~e eerie a€€€e€a~ sl~a~l ~eqt~€~e sari des€gr~ete pt~b~€e o~ P~€~ate €€~e banes es deemed neeessa~~ €e~ tke a€€€e€er~t ar~d a€€eet€rre t~se e€ €€~e appa~att~s- Fl~e lanes shall l~a~re a ~€r~€x~~tat w€dtl~ e€ 18 €eet {5486 ~}- The fire official shall designate fire lanes on public streets and on private property where necessary for the purpose of preventing parking in front of or adjacent to fire hydrants and fire department connections and to ensure access to buildings and structures for fire fighting and rescue apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum width of 18 feet (5486 mm) . 13. F-313.4 Signs and Markings. Add section F-313.4 as follows: The property owner or designee shall supply and install signs and other required markings to delineate fire lanes as directed by the fire official. 7 14. F-313.5 Specifications. Add section F-313.5 as follows: Fire lanes shall conform to the following specifications: (A) The design of such signs shall conform to the state manual on uniform traffic-control devices and shall include the language "No Parking-Fire Lane." (B) Signs designating fire lanes shall be located so as to provide at least one sign for every one hundred (100) feet of fire lane space. Should the fire marshal determine that additional signs are necessary, the owner or agent of the property shall provide the same. All such signs shall be maintained in proper position and sufficiently legible to be seen by an ordinarily observant person. (C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows: (1) Pave edge to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than 10' Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (2) Curb face to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (3) Pavement top to sign bottom: Rural: 5' 8 Urban: 7' (4) Curb top to sign bottom: Rural: 5' Urban: 7' (D) Posts for fire lane signs, where required, shall be metal and securely mounted. (E) The curb or pavement edge of all fire lanes shall be painted yellow. Any existing marking in the area designated as a fire lane shall be obliterated or painted over in a manner approved by the fire marshal. 15. F-313.6 Where fire lanes are designated at fire hydrant locations. The following shall apply where fire lanes are established at fire hydrant locations: (1) Where hydrants are located at or close to the curb line or edge of the road and face on a public street, a public parking lot or a private road open to the public, parkin within fifteen (15) feet is prohibited. (2) A special curb marking designated areas established pursuant to (1) above, shall be required and shall be yellow. (3) No planting, erection or other obstruction shall be allowed within four (4) feet of the fire hydrant. 9 (4) All hydrants shall be painted in accordance with standards established by the Fire Marshal. 5. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective from and after June 1, 1988. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~~~ ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/88 cc: K. R. Sharp, Fire Marshall Thomas Fuqua, Chief, Fire Department Michael Kavanaugh, Sheriff C. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Francis W. Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke, 24016 Main Library Ordinance File Roanoke County Code Book 10 C'.~t. A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T C~-~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . " ~- PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRES PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A_ P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T `~~ v C e / // PUBLIC HEARI G ON ~~~ >r ~ ~ 1~~~ ~ ~~--~~'T~~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of 'the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience wiii exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WE THE UNDERSIGNED, IN ATTENDANCE AT THE S/19/A8 MT. COMMUNITY MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LANDFIL~tr$OP.RD CONSULTANTS, STRONGLY URGE THE BOARD AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY SUPERVISORS TO PUR UE A WAS TO ~~'=1==- ~ -~ /--- =~=-~- -- ~~ /t '' ~~~-- ~ _ - ---------(C~------- ------------ ~`~ GJ -- ~------ - ------------ ~';- ~1-- ~, - w ~~ --3------------~------1~------------- ~~? ~, ENERGY PROGRAM IMMEDIATELY! PLEASANT AND THEIR BOARD OF ~----- ~~ _~~ _ ~ _~a~c~.~--------------- ~~~ ~~ a ~1 ~__~ t ~~~~~~ ~. ___ __ r'~1~-0'~ _ i ~v_ _~ ~. ~ ~ WE THE UNDERSIGNED, IN ATTENDANCE AT THE S/19/88 MT. PLEASANT COMMUNITY MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LANDFILL BOARD AND THEIR CONSULTANTS, STRONGLY URGE THE BOARD AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PURSUE A WASTE TO ENERGY PROGRAM IMMEDIATELY! ------ ~ I ----------------- -~- .~~'9,v.~.f'. ~c--~~---- p~ ti ,ll~,~,,~ 6 f .uf~ -- ... ~ ~x~?~ ``- - w ` .~~- - - 1 '~/ _~ ~-__.~1~ _____ ~__ ~`~.~. - ----J-'~ - - - -- -- - ----m`- ~ ----- _ ~.~ _,Q~.~.~.~-__ ~~~------------ WE THE UNDERSIGNED, IN ATTENDANCE AT THE 5/].9/88 MT. PLEASANT COMMUNITY MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LANDFILL BOARD AND THEIR CONSULTANTS, STRONGLY URGE THE BOARD AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PURSUE A WASTE TO ENERGY PROGRAM IMMEDIATE ! c~°~- ~°-~-~ -- -r ~N = ~ Nor ~- ~'-- -~-- -- - - -- ~~>~ ~~ r ~- - / , -----~ ~ -r =--~u------------ ---- - y r ----- ---- -- ~--- WE THE UNDERSIGNED, IN ATTENDANCE AT THE S/].9/88 MT. PLEASANT COMMUNITY MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LANDFICIr$OP.RD AND THEIR CONSULTANTS, STRONGLY URGE THE BOARD AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY fi_OARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PUR UE A WAS TO ENERGY PROGRAM IMMEDIATELY! ~_ ~~u - - - ~~ - ------ ~~~- -- - -- S3. _ ~J_ _ C":- - ------------ ,- c_~__~~ ?n-~- c~'.~4._Ysf. a~„~. r4~~~-?? :l~:~ ;,~ ;, - -~ ~ _ _ _`~ ~~ru~=~----- - ------- -- ~-- ~-- -~~"-~`~=a--------------- ~~ _ 2~~'v~ _ _ _ _ ~~ ~~ f __- ^_____i' ____~_____ ~_. ~hvr_ _ w~r______ WE THE UNDERSIGNED, IN ATTENDANCE AT THE S/].9/88 MT. PLEASANT COMMUNITY MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LANDFILL BOARD AND THEIR CONSULTANTS, STRONGLY URGE THE BOARD AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY 60ARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PURSUE A WASTE TO ENERGY PROGRAM IMMEDIATELY! ~,~ , -L.~~e~=P?='I~S-~-------------- ~- -'.-~~~- ~~------------------- -. -~~ ~~ O 1 , ,~ , ~ti~-~~- 1~~ ~=~5_ - - -/- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~,-~.l~,c'c[_~~ C._~ tL2-e=~u/`r't~l `~~2":J'~ ' ~~T ~~'~~~ ~~ ~31~ -------- - - fit? =/1~~~-`~= ------------- _ ~c 3 ~ ~\ n = ~_ ~r~~~ ~ ~ ~~==-------- - ---- -- ~/ - _ --------- ~~ ~ / , --~ ~~' , ,y~wi,~~-~~,-~~--~1, a~~'~~-~=`~--- ---------------------------------- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY M H z w H z 0 U O N 0 w 0 a a a OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24 018-16 9 9 IN RE: ) RECOMMENDATION 1.70 acre parcel of land, generally located at the Intersection ) of Route 419, Cordell Drive and ) McVitty Road, within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel No. 76.11-2-21 and Parcel ) No. 76.11-2-22, in the Roanoke County ) Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, INLAND PROPERTIES CORPORATION, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Single Family Residential District to B-1, Office District for the purpose of permitting construction of an office complex. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on March 1, 1988; and 1VHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. #.~~ c aae :syla~age~,c Feca~.~e+,~c~ - - .. ~Lb__.__ __ _ __-~s~T~.-s.~'I~T --Lib`~~§~£. -.__ _. __....._._._-~3.I 3333~i--~j3Z s3 ~sL`~ 1~7N39lfFfPi-~ ti~ti~}-~ ~}~ 3A~353~ 4t3I A ~ il~1Q ~i ~3-~5t1~i ~3I ~$`~L ~i`~L ld ~~ l ill~,~ Ctl ~3~.}. ! ...-..... ._. _.. ._......_ ... _..._-_.. _..._._.._.$ _.. ---...__.. _. .. ~rire* y . ~ it [ ig f c b~`L LIL`s~~ ~t~i[dtt7 AiI~%if4 Qi ~3~~~i. trg ~c5`I;r~`9t (3s?f3`44b`~: ~#!P#~F~ $#+1Iit~3~€~ X435 ~3i ~l~~#~!i E ,, __,._ ---__ -~--_ _____. __ __ ... _ _. _ ,__ - ~iA.-32~2.3~~333... .. __. $9 LL5`t~Sr`~ r~4`=LL`~ ~'3IA~3S i$3ti $i ##~it~li $94 `I ~? S3#~Fit~#3dX3 3'b?i~S~ilH~lt3~ II $$I`~} +3$I`4'~ Sl1Q3#tl"l~6it~€ ___ _ _ _ _ _---_._.. __ __ _ - {)~?T _.._ _ `~? - ~3`~- -_ - _ . S~Ii~Ztk#3~3~Ilsi#i-S~IIt!$i~Ji~tl~ . - rsn, ~£~`L$~ ~t+~`b~L &ii~8 ~,~Q1dfQ L9 SSi`b9 £~:`~~ NQii{i3l~C€3 ~I~~#iii~} 9 ?~Eli5~3i1(3 .___`_ --- ------- --~----__ __...._ _.,.._..-- __..~a~s~._ _ _.. _ ____~-----._~_ ._..__#~~~ _. -- - - ir~ir _ _ _ _ _~ - _ __ - - _ _ _- ~F3ii1f3 ~IS~IQ_QflEF~? ~?`b9I ~$;`s3t}? 63:3IlsY~S 3AIFQ'#i~ P#`JIi3E1~iS~ls3~ s 3L S64`£I I$. `$I . NQi56t1 9A€It~#llt+~ -----_.____.__.___-----. _-t,~__.__.__._... __ s~.~~ _..__.. _.. ~~ _ ___. __---_---f1~~ ~trl~ I$ 4b~`$L £L'~`f.$ i4#3Ktd[~'F3A3~I ~ii[#P#C~.33 ;t. bLb`CQ~ $~'L`IL% 8t#It#€#Z '8 '~€T!#t~~'ld ..._ ._ _ ._._ ._...__.._.. _..__ _._ __$L_ _ _ __ _ _~~~ _ _ -L~.`IFT _ _ __ ---_ I~3ktds~3'43Q"3F7 a1~#31NF~3d~S __- -. ; 3t#3Mis~~'~~(€ ,, 4£ L~`LI 474s3`$b ~~ 'iitli2iS~#I ----- - t~tI gIs?`L$£ 9f0`L$~' Hi~3E~ ~i~i~! 53~Ifs~}3S ~fI~~S Q 4#}.~~! '~. S3~FFiF4lki3dX~ ~ iP#3f~3L##iS , __..._-___--- --______ _ __ _ _ ___ ___. _ _ _. _._ _ . __3~ ~A _ ___ _ _ ,~r,_ -~1_NTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE ,: DATE '-S-ZSJ-°6R SUBJECT ~ UJ V N U~uc,r~f., BY~~ c~l~ TOPS@FORM1232 VERBAL ORDERS DON'T GO LITHOINU.SA ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ C ~ D ( t ... ~ ~ ~~ ~ A~ r• r• ~ ~~ ~ ~ I-~ N rr ~ O ~ A~ ~ ~' NO-"C p N r- r ~ rr • ~' rt ~' O ~ (D ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ r- n rnfi ao ~' ~ r• O rn fi O d rj O n ~ ~ rt,0 W ~ ~Q r• can ~ r' m ~ ~~ fi r- ct ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O d U1 Ul (D ~' y ri rt (D C r. ri (D ~ W O ro~~ ~ ro ~D~n ~ ~~ y (p N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ oFCn O rt ~ ~ ~~ ~ r- ~~ O ~ ~ fi r- C~ (D THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 20th j i day of June, 1988, by and between BOTETOURT COUNTY, j VIRGINIA, part of the first part; and ROANOKE COUNTY, I VIRGINIA, part of the second part. ~ WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Botetourt County and Roanoke County h ave agreed upon and developed a joint branch public library on approximately 5 acres lying near the community of Bonsack in the Blue Ridge Magisterial District of Botetourt County, j 'I Virginia, and WHEREAS, the said 5 acre tract or parcel of land was separated out of a 68 acre tract or parcel of land ownwed ~ by the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and which said 68 acre i tract lies partly in Botetourt County, Virginia and partly in ~ Roanoke County, Virginia, and i WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Development ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA, at Large County of Botetourt, to-wit: I, , a Notary Public in and for the State of Virginia, at Large, do hereby certify th a t and , whose names as Chairman and County Adminsitrator, of the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors, Virginia, are signed to the above Agreement, dated June 20, 1988, have acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand th is day of 1988. o ary u is My Commission Expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA, at Large of , to-wit: I, , a Notary Public in and for the State of Virginia, at Large, do hereby certify that NOM THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements herein contained, and for the purpose of destributing equitably the revenues produced ~ by real estate taxation, personal property taxation machinery ~ and tools taxation and business, professional and occupational taxation relating to the abovedescribed 68 acre tract lying partially in Botetourt County, Virginia, and I i partially in Roanoke County, Virginia, the parties agree as ~, f ollows 1. All taxable real estate, personal property and machinery and tools and all taxable business, professions and occupations located on the aforesaid 68 acre tract owned on the date of this agreement by the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation shall be assessed and collected by Roanoke County. The said assessments shall be at such rates as are elsewhere effective in Roanoke County. 2. Roanoke County shall pay to Botetourt County 50~ of the tax revenues collected pursuant to paragraph 1. 6. This agreement may be renewed upon these same terms for an additional term of years agreed upon by the parties and by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County and Roanoke County. Unless renewed, this agreement shall expire on December 31, 2067. 7. This agreement may be terminated at will by either party. Upon termination the terminating party shall pay to the non-terminating party a sum of money equal to the non-terminating party's interest in the contract as valued from the date of termination through the expiration of the contract term. The amount of such sum of money shall be determined by a panel or committee composed of the following: Each party's Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, each party's County Administrator, each party's Treasurer, each party's Commissioner of the Revenue and a certified real estate appraiser agreed upon by each party. Witness the following signatures and seals executed the day and year first above written. ommiss over o evenue or oano e County reasurer o oano a oun y 0611S =~V.` ... _ r -' . i ~,,~' ,s``,.. .. ,r ; ~ru., .. .._..4 t,, t +, } r, ,= ~~ ~=:~ ~ ~. ~,x 4. ~ ^' ~ ~~c O~ AOANp,~,~ Z f7 7 2 ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ J 1 Y '-7Y Y 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' ABeauti/ulBeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT January 21, 1988 ALAN H. BRITTLE /\ CAVE SPRING IdAGiSTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Rev. Branan G. Thompson Colonial Avenue Baptist Church 4165 Colonial Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Reverend Thompson: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board of Supervisors' meeting in the past. We would again like to call on you to present the invocation on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, at 3:00 p.m. If you are unable to do this, please call me at 772-2005. Someone from this office will be calling you soon to see if this time is acceptable to you, or if you would prefer another date. The Board members are aware of how busy your schedule is, and they appreciate your volunteering the time to offer God's blessing at their meetings. Sincerely,. Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.7 8 7 acre parcel of land, > generally located at intersection ) of Route 419, and Chaparral Dr. ) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and > recorded as parcel # 8 7.0 6 - 4 - 4 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) RDC:ONS~IIIVDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Virginia First Savings, F. S. B. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land fran R-3 Residential to B-1 (Office Use) District for the purpose of construction District of banking and office structure WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on ?`iav 3 , 19 88 ;and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has reconunended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission rec.'antYtends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from its present R-3 Residential, to B-1 (Office Use) zoning with ~roffered ~- con i lons. The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: Jones Respectfull submitted, Alternate Secretary, n,,.,.,,-,~~,. n.......~__ n~ ___--_ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: A 14.93 acre parcel of land, generally located on the North Side of Va. Sec. Route 419, east of Mudlick and west of the Cave Spring Office Park, within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel No. 76.16-1-38 and Parcel No. 76.16-I-39 in the Roanoke County Tax Records RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEP.EAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1, Residential District to B-1, Business District for the purpose of the development of an office complex. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTD RN EY5-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D18-1699 Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on May 3, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County ~~ Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-1, Business District, subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Gordon and upon the following recorded votes: AYES: ti1r. Gordon, Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead and Ms. NAYS ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Flippen None None Mr. Jones Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 r 1 e 2 d. c 2 ~, ,. t '~~. V?RGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 22.87 acre parcel of land and two ) 1.00-acre parcels of land generally ) located on the western side of ) Colonial Avenue, S.W. opposite the ) intersection of Ogden Road within ) the Cave Spring Magisterial District,) and together recorded as parcel ~~ ) 77.11-1-55) in the Roanoke County ) Tax Records. ) RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: .`'~ _~ ~~' W ~"~ .~ 0 r,~ W ETH ERI NGTON ~ MELCHIONNA WHEREAS, your Petitioner Occidental Development, Ltd. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced 22.87-acre parcel of ]_and from R-1 Single Family Residential District to R-3 Multi-Family Residential District for the purpose of multi- family dwellings and to rezone both of the above-referenced 1.00-acre parcels from R-1 Single Family Pesidential District to B-1 Office District. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on May 3, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted, subject to the conditions proferred by the Petitioner. NOW, THEREFOP.E, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcels of land be rezoned as requested, subject to the conditions proferred by the Petitioner. The above action was adopted on motion of nn„ ~;tt and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Witt, Mr. Gordon, Mrs. Flippen, Mr. Winstead NAYS: ABSENT : Mr. ,Tones Respectfully Submitted, !,L~~ ~~/ fit/ Alternate Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission WETHERINGTON Si MELCHIONNA h VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: ) RECOMMENDATION -------------- A 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally ) located on the north side of Route 601 ) east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins) Magisterial District and recorded as ) part of Parcel No. 38.16-3.1 in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, M. E. HINMAN and DOMINION TRUST COMPANY, have filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to amend the Land Use Plan of Roanoke County for designation of a 3.56 acre tract east of Tinker Creek on Hollins Road from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation for the purpose of operating a retail garden center business. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on iAp~~i~ 5,1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due ^STERNOUOT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RGANl7KE, VIRGINIA 24G18-1fi99 consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the request to amend the Land Use Plan of ~. ,~ Roanoke County for designation of the above captioned property from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors to amend the Land Use Plan of Roanoke County for designation of the above captioned property from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation District, subject to the proferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ms. Flippen, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Jones, Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead, Ms. Flippen, Mr. Gordon ^5TERHGUDT, FERGUSGN NATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATT 0 R N EYS-AT-LAW RGANGKE, VIRGINIA 24010-1699 NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~ r2.e13a.c Respectfully submitted, C~ Gi'1~~"..~ "" Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 LEGAL NOTICE r~ DSTERHGUDT, FERGUSGN MATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATTGRNEYS-AT-LAW RUANGKE, VIRGINIA ~4G18-1599 Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on May 24, 1988, on the petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust Company to amend the Land Use Plan of Roanoke County for designation of a 3.56 acre tract east of Tinker Creek on Hollins Road from Development Land Use Designation to Transition Land Use Designation, pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: A. 3.56 acre parcel of land, generally located on the north side of Route 601, east of Tinker Creek within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as part of Parcel No. 38.16-3.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, ,located in Room 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018 if special provisions are necessary for attendance Given under my hand this ~ ~h day of ------- U5TERH000T, FERGUSON NATT, AHERGN S AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 198 8 . ----- -- ~ ~p u-~` y C I e r k-------- Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County --------------------------------------- Please publish in the evening edition of The Roanoke Times- Wortd News on Tuesday, May 10, 1988, and Tuesday, May 17, 1988. Please bill cost of the publication to Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron E Agee, P.C., 1919 Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018. r2.e13.c 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: Vacate portion of existing ) 50 foot right-of-way on ) Airpoint Drive as recorded ) RECOMMENDATIONS in Plat Book 6 Page 46 ) WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Mr. Carson L. King did petition the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requesting that a portion of Airpoint Drive right-of-way be permanently closed and vacated; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has given careful consideration to said petition and to said referral of the Board of Supervisors and has heard evidence touching the merits of said permanent closing and vacation of a portion of Airpoint Drive right-of-way as shown on the attached sketch and on Map of Airpoint Estates which plat is attached to the petition filed herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and ordered that at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, held on the 17th of May, 1988, that the petition to permanently close and vacate a portion of Airpoint Drive right-of-way as shown on the plat, hereinabove set forth, is hereby approved and this Planning Commission accordingly hereby recommends in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Virginia to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that a portion of Airpoint Drive, as shown on the plat prepared by the Roanoke County, Engineering Department be permanently vacated and be it further RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be forthwith certified and delivered by the Secretary of this Planning Commission to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. The above action was adopted on motion of Mike Gordon seconded by and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen NAYS: None ABSENT: Winstead Roanoke County Planning Commission Respectfully submitted, .~ Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of THE. HOBART COMPANIES LTD. requesting rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Office of a tract containing 14.93 acres and located on the north side of Electric Road (Route 419) approximately 700 feet west of Postal Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct an office complex to be known of Colonnade II. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered .conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 5th day of May, 1988. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Tuesday, May 17, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Ed Natt P. 0. Box 20068 Roanoke, Va. 24018-1699 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors-will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of VIRGINIA FIRST SAVINGS, F.S.B. requesting rezoning from R-3 Residential to B-1 Business of a tract .containing 0.787 acre and located southwest of the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) and Chaparral Drive (Route 800). in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a building containing a bank and office. The, County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered .conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this fifth day of May, 1988. ~• Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Tuesday, May 17, 1988 Direct the bill for publication to: Heywood Fralin 3912 Electric Road Roanoke, Virginia 24014 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening. session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT LTD. requesting rezoning from R-1 Residential to R-3 Residential of a tract containing 22.87 acres and rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business of a tract containing 2.0 acres and located immediately west of the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a 216 unit rental apartment complex with two adjoining office buildings. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 5th day of May, 1988. i~Q~~ ~' Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Tuesday, May 17, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Mr. Donald L. Wetherington 1100 Crestar Bank Building P. 0. BOX 90 Roanoke, Va. 24002 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. or_ Tuesday, ~~,,j'~~~~^, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition o.f ViR4-~11A 1--rzst ~vi-Jc~s 4 F•S• 3 • .~ _._.. requesting rezoning from (~3~ T~ES-DEtJT1~.L ~ to ~'~~____~ ~t~sINESS of a t~:r~et contain:'-.rig 0.181 ac.2~- and located 50UT'Htn1K,T pF -T'HE irJT~~:~EC..---+U~•1 O~ ~L~C,-r'e.IG R.oh-r~ CR.oUte 41~j~ p,n~ CNnPAa.2~.L TJQ~v~ l.~o~~ pj00~ in the CavE ~~~~,,-~ Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to Con~'uG~C q }~-Id-ny~ Ga-n~'a+n~n,~ G) ~xrvlk a~ offic~eS. The County Planning Commission recommends ~~~raVQI w~+h~roffer~ Gondt~"~o~5. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke, County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. /7' ~~~ Given under my hand this, day of ~ 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, 1'~~ ~~ Tuesday , ~1~~~ 7 Direct the bill for Publication to: ~y~~ ~~~~,~~~~ ~ D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, G~V Z T/y~$$ , 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~Slen ~. Lona and 3annes W. Barris, Sr. -~-/c~____VaII~.v ~~iver ~4,les requesting G. 5 e ci a.~ e xce h'an rv~ r t a nc~ _ r ~ P re~'oninc~ from 13-2~ -6~sines5 to [3-~_~n5lnes5 of a tract containing Iess -~~,c,n one. c.c.r~ and located c,t 33Q3 M+ ~Icas ~t ~.Ic.ya~d in the Ulp}p,~ Magisterial District.1 Rezoning has been requested to 5~-~~ ra.nc~ VcDai r ~arrv~ e~~i~M¢nl . The County Planning Commission recommends de.~ia.l . - A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this ~~-~, day of ~V ~ 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday , lMa~ ( Q r I~~ ~ Tuesday - I~u~ ~~ ~~~ Direct the bill for Publication to: E d ~ ~~ P~ . ~o ~. zoos D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a publi,~/c hearing at their evening session. beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, /0.y Z ~ , 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenu/e, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ©CCi~2nlfa~_~de~o~jMP.uf ~~G~. requesting rezoning from ~~ ~~~G~e~tl~iit/ to 1L 3 ,~es,~%~a~ of a tract e ntaining 22.87 Qcres and re~o~/~Ny m.K- ' , es. t.~J is a- /, Tjusint°Ss o~ a t~Ia.-e~- G~n~~~~}.•~:•~ Z.O aCi~s located i~M.ted~afe~ a~sf Ol` fik2 i~c/fe/S~efi©.,/ aF Co/a.y~a/ ~/Ca/ue a~/d C~h~v rt'c~d in the Q/e ~~,:y9 Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested vto CONS/uCf Q L!6 y~l,'f icn!{~~ 0.~~f.Kev`~ /ex ~r~ 7~a/o ac~~p„~;,~ ~~ce 6~;1a!c,~g The County Planning Commission recommends /,~~o A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this ~' day of /~a~._, 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, /~GL~ /~~ ~cg~ Tuesday, ~y ~7~ ~~~8 Direct the bill for Publication to: l~-(re. T~NaI~ L, t.~1~t1~,,..~ c(©o Cres~a.r ~N~ ~~ ~d~9 fem. 4. ~~ ?~ 44~rr~ ~oa~©~ , V~ Z4ooZ D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening. session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Ma,T Z4~1~18~ 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of -~-I~e. ~oc~noke ~un'~/ aoard of StA,~crvisors and CGrson Ki n°~ requesting ~aae-r~i~ag~ -}o vacate. c` po~-h~on o~ an ~ exis~h~no, riah~-o~- wAy knower as {~ ~ r i~o n ~' ~~/ i v e. ~o r a ~~~-a ~~ ~c t es~-t-~ i-~ i~ w ~ d ~-~, ~ ~0 +o -~d- ~~~ 0 ~ ~ n n i n ~- ~en~ o ~v~~a~ n o ~e 2Z•1 3~5fee in e .n so r, 'I,s n,nr~ ex~e.ndina ii1 ~~-~T~ a ec n Magisterial District. ~~zr~ni nrr h~.a~G_h~~e- to _ __------------- ~ _--- - The County Planning Commission s Wi(~ ~teU/ -1:~,e reaUes~ a-~ -I-~e.r (1(~~,y e~l , Iq$~ rnee~~n~. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this S ~ day of ~_ 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday. M~v h , 198 Tuesday, YI(l~.v 11. I~188 Direct the bill for Publication to: ~oana~~ Cown~ En~inee. /~ nc, ~e~". ~•d • ~ox, Z~1R40 Rac~.no ke , V~ Z-`~01 ~ D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m, on Tuesday, nno~ a y , 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of I h~ ~o~art Car„.~aM„~~, , 4.k~. requesting rezoning from ~,-- ~,~~,~e,,,~~,wQ to ~I (~~.~,~.e of a tract containing iy,Q3 GtLc~e.~ and located on ~-~.r no-r~-1n ~~a~C, o~ ~1~~-~~ ~~ ~ 7Zo-v7kc, '~ tQ~,~pmximc~~'t~u X00 ~~Gt W~,,t o~ 1~o~~a,Q ~r~~cin the ~A)„~•,c~+- ~ -ll s Magisterial District . Rezoning has been requested to e.cm~-}ci~c~" Gv~ ~~C~,c_e_ Corh7(~~ ~o ~r kr~c,w,n a5 Eo~rnnnaaP. il. The County Planning Commission recommends ~Dro~~ an'N~ -~~~c~r~~ em1c~~ a-ca~n5. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this ~~ day of ~ 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, ~Cty l D } 1 ~ 8~ Tue sda , -'yl Z~ ~`' l a 4S ~ Direct the bill for Publication to: ~r~ ~a~ {~crr,~o-lie.. V' ~ ~ yD~ ~ - ~ c~a °~ z COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1988 JANUARY Social Services Board (Welfare) Four year term of William P. Broderick, Chairman, will expire 1/1/88. Transportation and Safety Commission Three year terms of Leo Trenor, Hollins District, Charlotte Lichtenstein, Windsor Hills District, and May Johnson, Cave Spring District, will expire 1/1/88. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins District will expire 1/22/88. FEBRUARY Grievance Panel Two year term of Joe W. Rimes will expire 2/23/88. MARCH Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board Two year terms of Gerald Curtiss, Catawba District, Roger Smith, Catawba District, Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District, Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton District, Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District, will expire 3/22/88. One year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring, will expire 3/22/88. Two year term of judicial appointment Todd Turner will expire 3/21/88. League of Older Americans One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative, will expire 3/31/88. APRIL Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four year term of B. J. King, Windsor Hills District, will expire 4/13/88. Four year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton District, will expire 4/27/88. JUNE Fifth Planning District Commission Three year term of Lee B. Eddy, Citizen Representative, will expire 6/30/88. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District, Yvonne Willis, Catawba District, James Bryant, Hollins District, Paul D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District, and Roger L. Falls, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/88. Roanoke County School Board - Appointed by School Board Selection Committee Four year term of Paul Black, Hollins District, will expire 6/30/88. JULY Social Services Board (Welfare) Four year term of Betty Jo Anthony will expire 7/19/88. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waster Management Board Four year terms of Howard R. Keister, Jr., County Representative, and John H. Parrott, Chairman, City Representative, will expire 7/31/88. AUGUST Community Corrections Resources Board One year terms of Bernard Hairston, and Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate, will expire 8/13/88. CFUTFMRRR Grievance Panel Two year term of Thomas T. Palmer will expire 9/10/88. Industrial Development Authority 2 Four year term of Tom Isenhart, Catawba District, will expire 9/26/88. OCTOBER Grievance Panel Three year term of Cecil Hill, Alternate, will expire 10/12/88. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board Two year term of Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large, will expire 10/31/88. NOVEMBER Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board One year terms of Cassidee R. Nickens, youth member from William Byrd, and Molly Eller, youth member from Glenvar High, will expire 11/13/88. i1T.'(`F.MRFR Library Board Four year term of Carolyn Pence, Vinton District, will expire 12/31/88. Mental Health SErvices of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board Three year term of Barbara Higgins, County appointee, will expire 12/31/88. Roanoke County Planning Commission Four year term of Michael J. Gordon, Windsor Hills District, will expire 12/31/88. 3 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND CARSON KING, requesting vacation of a portion of an existing right-of- way known as Airpoint Drive for a width of 30 to approximately 0 feet beginning at Bent Mountain Road (Route 221) and extending in an easterly direction 365 feet in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Human Resources ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary fog attendance. Given under my hand Lhis 5th day of May, 1988. /~a~-~~, -~• a Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Tuesday,.May 17, 1988 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Engineering Department P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of GLEN E. LONG AND JAMES W. HARRIS, SR. t/a VALLEY OLIVER SALES requesting rezoning from B-2 Business to B-3 Business and a Special Exception Permit of a tract containing less than one acre and located at 3303 Mt. Pleasant Boulevard in the Vinton Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to sell and repair farm equipment. The County Planning Commission recommends denial. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 5th day of May, 1988. ~~~ ~ ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ' Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Tuesday, May 17, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Ed Natt P. 0. Box 20068 Roanoke, Va. 24018-1699 o ~ o ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o~ °~ ~~~~ c:. o ~ R ~ OF POANp,Y~ ~ ~ ti ~ p Z 4~ ~ 2 J a /x~ 150 1 ~/ YEAN$ ~J (J SFSQU(CEN7ENN~P~ A I3enuti'td Beginning C~vixnt~ of ~vttnnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE May 26 , 1988 Rev. Branan G. Thompson Colonial Avenue Baptist Church 4165 Colonial Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Reverend Thompson: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. Ver t yo r <,2~ ~0 Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 of ROANp,~.~ ~ ,a p a Cnu~~~ ~~ ~~~. ,~ ~ 18 r~~ 88 SFSOU(CENTENN~P~' A Btau~i~u/ Beginning M E M O RAN D U M T0: Diane Hyatt Director of Finance FROM: Mary H. Allen y~h-~`~ Deputy Clerk DATE: May 25, 19.88 SUBJECT: Allocation from Board Contingency Fund At their meeting on May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors moved by unanimous vote to allocate the following funds from the Board Contingency Fund: $3,000 for the Vinton Rescue Squad for their 50th Anniversay Celebration $1500 for the Council of~Community Services Information and Referral Services Please take the. necessary action to allocate these monies. Thank you. mha CC: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens O~ POANp,Y~ ti •~ ~ ~ ~ 2 Z ~ C~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~e °~ a 8~ E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A 6cnuti/ulBcgi~aning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 2 7 , 19 8 8 BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mrs. Mimi Hodgin 805 Virginia Avenue Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mrs., Hodgin: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Community School for a raffle permit. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; therefore, the permit will expire December 31, 1988. This permit, however, is only valid for the dates specified on your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Very truly yours, ~ a~u-~ ~ ~~~r~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh CC: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004 f O~ ROANp,I.~ ~ , I~ A Z G7 ~ 2 J a ~~~~~ ~~ I/JJ~~//r!!QQ\\ T~~~~~~ i 8 $ E50 $$ SFSQVICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul(3eginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 27 , 19 $ 8 HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Thomas A. Darnall 1010 Halliahurst AVenue Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Darnall: The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours `~~~ ,~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O a Q z E""' z cw . ~ w H Q Q o ~ ~., w u ~ ~ ~ u ~ Z ~ o w O w z ~ ~ ~ w w x H o w ~ x ~ . z N O H H n z Q z 0 _~ ~ Z O U © ~ cn cn °~ z ~ Q ~ ~ N O O Q w O Q ~ Z ~ w ~ U ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ E.., w w U `w U ~ ~ w ~ U w x U w . z ~ ~ ~ `~ o Z O w E--~ U ~ Q Q Q u Q 0 H z u O~ ROANp~~ ~ ~ ~. .A Z o a 18~ E50 $$ SFS~IUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Jon Walp 3153-8B Berry Lane, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Walp: May 27, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals for a four-year term beginning April 27, 1988, and expiring April 27, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed or reappointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rp for to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk at 387-6208 as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, `may-~~-v, ~d . Q~e~,~-. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors mha Enclosures cc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court Mr. Skip Nininger, Construction & Building Services C~n~tn~~ of ~n~trtn~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 O~ ROANp~F ~ ~ ~. .~ Z z ~ a 8 8 E50 $$ `rFSQU1CENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ul Beginni~rg COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE May 27, 1988 Mr. Roger L. Falls 423 McGeorge Drive Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Falls: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Roanoke County bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department (~n~n~~ ~f ~nttnvhe Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 of RoaNO,~~ ~ ~ t, ~ p 2 L7 7 2 J a 18 8 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Kenneth D. Bowen Route 4, Box 180 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Bowen: May 27, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS M.4GISTE RIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department ~IILtn~~ D~ ~A~iYiII~t~P P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ µOANp,Y~ a ~ ~ ~. .~ Z z J a i $ E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~~ of ~nttnnke Ms. Yvonne Willis 2941 Creekwood Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Ms. Willis: May 27, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed.- We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp~~ .a w ti A Z 17 2 J a 8 E50 8$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul8e~inning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. James Bryant 5219 Westfield Place, NW Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Bryant: May 27, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department C~n~tn~~ of ~nttnnk~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 OF ROANp,Y~ ti •~ Z A ~ ~ J a YEANS 18 150 88 SFSQV-CENTENN~P~ A Beauri~ull3egiruriu~ C~nun~~ n~ ~nttnn~e COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE May 26, 1988 The Honorable Anthony Henrico County Board P. 0. Box 27032 P. Mehfoud, Chairman of Supervisors Richmond, Virginia 23273 Dear Mr. Mehfoud: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT L308 L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of a Proclamation recognizing those law enforcement officers who are participating the Virginia Special Olympics Torch Run. This proclamation was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 25, 1988. Thirteen members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department will be participating in the Torch Run and at our Board meeting we also recognized their involvement. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, m ~~, ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA of County of Henrico BOAROOFSUPERVISORS ~ ANTHONY P. MEHFOUD, Chairman eY PARHAM AND HUNGARY SPRING ROADS . P.O. BOX 27032 ` L. RAV SHADWELL, JR., Vice Chairman RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23273 0o yQ a RICHARD W. GLOVER ne"a~c DAVID A. KAECHELE JOHN A. WALDROP, JR. TO: Chairpersons of Governing Bodies Commonwealth of Virginia ` ~ ~ ( FROM: Anthony P. Mehfoud, Chairman erv' ors Su Henrico Board of Count ~ y p SUBJECT: Virginia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run DATE: May 12, 1988 During the first week in June across the Commonwealth of Virginia police chiefs and officers, Secret Service and F.B.I. agents, military police, sheriffs, state troopers, prison guards and other law enforcement personnel will be running in the Law Enforcement Torch Run for the 1988 Special Olympics. These games unite the world on the common ground of athletic competition, while fostering interaction and friendship between retarded and non-retarded individuals -all at no cost to athletes or their families. As Chairman of the Board of Supervisors in the County of Henrico, I am asking you, as the Chairperson or Mayor.in your jurisdiction, to give public support to the Run in your community. The Committee for the 1988 Virginia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run is ably and enthusiastically chaired by Colonel Richard G. Engels, Chief of Police, Henrico County. This year more than 40,000 officers worldwide will run over 52,000 miles - twice the distance around the earth's equator. The number of participants is impressive. We would like to have a hundred percent participation in Virginia, and you can certainly help us achieve this goal. At its May 25, 1988, meeting the Henrico Board of County Supervisors will recognize and salute those local and statewide participants in the (988 Law Enforcement Torch Run. I urge and encourage your governing body to issue a similar proclamation, unexecuted copy enclosed, recognizing the 1988 Virginia Special Olympics as a fitting cause to unite local law enforcement officers, thereby giving them closer ties to the community and to a very special population -the mentally retarded. If you have never attended, you should- take the opportunity to witness the opening ceremony of the Special Olympics Summer Games on the evening of June 3, 1988, when the law enforcement officers from across the Commonwealth will conclude the Run and enter the Robins Center at the University of Richmond. There they will symbolically light the torch and officially open the 1988 Virginia Special Olympics. 1 look forward to hearing from you and receiving a copy of a proclamation from your governing body supporting the Virginia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. Attachments PROCLAMATION l ~-~•~~t DRAFT 1988 Virginia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run ~ ~~ / a `fir _~"``,,4 May 30 thru June 3, 1988 WHEREAS, The International Special Olympics is the world's largest program of year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with mental retardation, uniting the world on the common ground of athletic competition while fostering interaction and friendship between retarded and non-retarded individuals; and WHEREAS, In 1984 the International Association of Police Chiefs enthusiastically adopted the highly successful Torch Run program, and today Runs are conducted in every state and territory in the United States and nine countries; and WHEREAS, This year police chiefs and officers, Secret Service and FBI agents, military police, sheriffs, state troopers, prison guards and other law enforcement personnel will run 52,000 miles -twice the distance around the earth's equator - to open the Special Olympics; and WHEREAS, The torch will have been run across the Commonwealth by law enforcement officers starting the last week in May from points north, south, east and west, appropriately ending the Run in our State Capital. NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize and salute those local and statewide participants in the 1988 Law Enforcement Torch Run, who on the evening of June 3 will enter the Robins Center at the University of Richmond to symbolically light the torch -officially opening the (988 Virginia Special Olympics Summer Games; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, That the 3oard of Supervisors calls upon the citizens of the County of Henrico to encourage the Spirit of the Special Olympics -Skill, Courage, Sharing and Joy - so that athletes with mental retardation may reveal to the world these special qualities in which they excel. (SEAL) Margaret 3. Baker, Clerk Anthony P. Mehfoud, Chairman May 25, 1988 Henrico Board of Covnty Supervisors ~. v ... a 8 .~ .~ O~ a v wa ~ va~° u ~ '~W~; ~' ... B "~. ~°a .. v