Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/17/1987 - Regularo~ aonN ~.~ ~~~~~ ~~ ,~ ~ 18 ~ 88 sFSCU1CENTENN~P~ aaeaurr/ulBcginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA NOVEMBER 17, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.), 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Childrens' Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS (1) INTRODUCED EMPLOYEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OFFICERS (2) BLJ PRESENTED CERTIFICATE TO TREASURER FRED ANDERSON FOR COMPLETION OF NACTFO TRAINING PROGRAM C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 15 - 21, 1987 as American Education Week in Roanoke County. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of funding for sewer extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE URC 2. Approval of funding for sewer extension to serve Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE URC 3. Resolution Requesting the Virginia Resources Authority to issue bonds for Utility Capital Improvements. LG/HCN TO APPROVE URC 4. Request from the Town of Vinton for increase in sewage volume allocation. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE URC 5. Request from the Va. Department of Transportation for allocation of funds for Starkey Road storm sewer project. AHB/BLJ TO APPROVE URC 6. Reappropriation of Landfill Funds to the Board Contingency Fund. AHB/BLJ TO APPROVE URC 7. Request for approval to purchase two replacement vehicles. AHB/BLJ TO APPROVE AYES: AHB,LG,SAM,BLJ NAYS: HCN F. WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request to reschedule public hearing on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan from November 17, 1987 to December 15, 1987. BLJ/HCN TO RESCHEDULE - UW 2. Request to reschedule public hearing authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer. 2 AHB/LG TO RESCHEDULE - UW H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. Health Department Board of Directors 3. Human Services Committee 4. Library Board 5. Planning Commission 6. Recreation Commission HCN REQUESTED THAT HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS NOT BE MADE UNTIL THAT COMMITTEE BECOMES ACTIVE AGAIN. AHB REQUESTED DEPUTY CLERK TO ADD CAVE SPRING PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER TO APPOINTMENTS AS TERM EXPIRES 12/31/87. I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS NICRENS: ANNOUNCED THAT HE WOULD MAKE A REPORT CONCERNING THE WILLIAM BYRD ATHLETIC FIELDS AT THE EVENING SESSION J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 13, 1987 2. Request from the Town of Vinton to designate Larry A. Logan to act as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton. 3. Acceptance of water facilities serving an office building on Centurion Road. 4. Approval of Resolution requesting the Va. Department of Transportation to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 and Route 1905 into the Secondary System as a Rural Addition. 5. Acceptance of easements, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, Mental Health Services Board of Directors, Recreation Commission. 7. Request from the City of Roanoke to prepay annexation indebtedness with Roanoke County. 8. Settlement of Board of Supervisors v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co ., and disbursal of settlement proceeds. 9. Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements and road right-of-way easements being dedicated to the County - Southwest Industrial Park. K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE L. REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED 1. Accounts Paid for the month of October 1987. 2. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability for the month of October 1987. 3. Status Report on Valley Metro extension on Brambleton Avenue. M. WORK SESSION 1. 1988 Legislative Program SAM REQUESTED THAT 1/2~ LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX BE SUPPORTED BLJ REQUESTED THAT BOARD SUPPORT DELEGATE WOODRUM'S REQUEST TO EXPAND RIVER FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS. HCN REQUESTED BOARD SUPPORT FOR DELEGATE THOMAS REQUEST FOR PARK FUNDING AHB REQUESTED THAT REFUSE COLLECTION TRUCKS BE EQUIPPED WITH FLASHING LIGHTS OF ANY COLOR 4 N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (1) (2) and )6) BLJ/LG - URC AT 4:35 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) O. NEW BUSINESS HCN ANNOUNCED THAT HE HAD ATTENDED A MEETING WITH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL, ARCHITECTS, ECH AND PMM TO DISCUSS THE ATHLETIC FIELDS AT WILLIAM BYRD. ARCHITECTS WILL MEET WITH THE CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONSTRUCTORS TO DETERMINE WHAT PART OF THE WORR WAS DONE AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL SPECS AND WHAT WAS DONE AFTER THAT AT SOMEONE'S EXPENSE OTHER THAN ROANORE COUNTY. 1. Request for establishment of a volunteer fire company in the Back Creek area. LG/AHB TO APPROVE URC P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acceptance of a donation of a small plot of real estate on Route 311 from the County School Board to the Board of Supervisors. HCN/AHB TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/1/87 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of surplus real estate, 37.863 acres located off Roanoke Boulevard and Hemlock Road, City of Salem, tax map no. 194-1-1 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/1/87 Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating the remaining Plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision. BLJ/LG TO APPROVE URC 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the lease of surplus real estate, Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. LG/SAM TO DENY LEASE URC LG/BLJ TO DECLARE SURPLUS AND AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR LEASE - URC 3. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of surplus real estate - well lot in Otterview Garden subdivision. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE OFFER OF L. EDGAR FOLEY FOR $13,500 URC R. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1187-1 Petition of Plantation Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a golf course on a 24.77 acre tract located at 5621 Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/SAM TO CONTINUE UNTIL 12/15/87 AND READVERTISE WITH CORRECT ACREAGE URC 1187-2 Petition of Keith and Diane Bradshaw for a Special Exception Permit to operate a child care center on a 1.58 acre tract located on the west side of Route 643 approximately 300 feet north of its intersection with Route 460 in the Catawba Magisterial District. SAM/HCN TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS URC 1187-3 Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates requesting rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business and amendment of the Roanoke. County Land Use Plan of a tract containing 1.48 acres and located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION) CONTINUED 1187-4 Petition of Roger P. Jefferson requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business and M-1 Industrial of a tract containing 1.35 acres and located at the Southwest intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. AHB/HCN TO APPROVE URC 1187-5 Petition of M. T. Holding Company requesting rezoning from B-2 Business to M-1 Industrial of a portion of a tract containing 0.56 acre and located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. AHB/HCN TO APPROVE URC 1187-6 Public Hearing for comment upon Roanoke County's request that the 1988 General Assembly amend its charter as follows: Section 2.02: Taxing Powers, Section 8.03: .Office of License Inspections, and Section 9.03: Board of Zoning Appeals. S. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. CHUCK WILLIAMS CONCERNING ATHLETIC FIELDS AT WILLIAM BYRD SCHOOL AHB/LG MOTION THAT THE SALARY OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY BE INCREASED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1988 BY 5~. URC T. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:10 P.M. 7 O~ ROANp,YF z ~ ~ 2 I ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ O a ~i V' i~-~ 18 E50 88 SFSQVICENTENN~P~ A Bcnuri/ulBcRinninR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE Novem p ^7 ber 19 19 8 / CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Childrens' Home Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Rev. Harris: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. Very truly/yo>,~rs, Bob L. ~~nson, Chairman Roanoke ounty Board of Supervisors mha P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 + A O~ POANp,Y~ ti 'A A a ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ,~ pp ~ r¢~as 8U SFSQUICEN7EN~~P~ A Bcauti/u/Beginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 17, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Childrens' Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 15 - 21, 1987 as American Education Week in Roanoke County. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of funding for sewer extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460. 2. Approval of funding for sewer extension to serve Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road. 3. Resolution Requesting the Virginia Resources Authority to issue bonds for Utility Capital Improvements. T 4. Request from the Town of Vinton for increase in sewage volume allocation. 5. Request from the Va. Department of Transportation for allocation of funds for Starkey Road storm sewer project. 6. Request for approval to purchase two replacement vehicles. F. REQUEST FOR WORR SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request to reschedule public hearing on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan from November 17, 1987 to December 15, 1987. 2. Request to reschedule public hearing authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer. H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. Health Department Board of Directors 3. Human Services Committee 4. Library Board 5. Planning Commission 6. Recreation Commission I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 13, 1987 2. Request from the Town of Vinton to designate Larry A. Logan to act as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton . 3. Acceptance of water facilities serving an office building on Centurion Road. 4. Approval of Resolution requesting the Va. Department of Transportation to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 and Route 1905 into the Secondary System as a Rural Addition. 5. Acceptance of easements, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, Mental Health Services Board of Directors, Recreation Commission. 7. Request from the City of Roanoke to prepay annexation indebtedness with Roanoke County. 8. Settlement of Board of Supervisors v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and disbursal of settlement proceeds. 9. Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements and road right-of-way easements being dedicated to the County - Southwest Industrial Park. K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L. REPORTS 1. Accounts Paid for the month of October 1987. 2. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability for the month of October 1987. 3. Status Report on Valley Metro extension on Brambleton Avenue. M. WORK SESSION 1. 1988 Legislative Program N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a). EVENING__SESSION (7:00 P.M.) O. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for establishment of a volunteer fire company in the Back Creek area. P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acceptance of a donation of a small plot of real estate on Route 311 from the County School Board to the Board of Supervisors. 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of surplus real estate, 37.863 acres located off Roanoke Boulevard and Hemlock Road, City of Salem, tax map no. 194-1-1 Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating the remaining Plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision. 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the lease of surplus real estate, Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. 3. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of surplus real estate - well lot in Otterview Garden subdivision. R. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1187-1 Petition of Plantation Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a golf course on a 24.77 acre tract located at 5621 Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1187-2 Petition of Keith and Diane Bradshaw for a Special Exception Permit to operate a child care center on a 1.58 acre tract located on the west side of Route 643 approximately 300 feet north of its intersection with Route 460 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 4 1187-3 Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates requesting rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business and amendment of the Roanoke County Land Use Plan of a tract containing 1.48 acres and located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION) 1187-4 Petition of Roger P. Jefferson requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business and M-1 Industrial of a tract containing 1.35 acres and located at the Southwest intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1187-5 Petition of M. T. Holding Company requesting rezoning from B-2 Business to M-1 Industrial of a portion of a tract containing 0.56 acre and located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1187-6 Public Hearing for comment upon Roanoke County's request that the 1988 General Assembly amend its charter as follows: Section 2.02: Taxing Powers, Section 8.03: Office of License Inspections, and Section 9.03: Board of Zoning Appeals. S. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T. ADJOURNMENT 5 ~' -- / PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEER OF NOVEMBER 15 - 21, 1987 AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, the public schools are an important and integral part of our society; and WHEREAS, the concept of a free and equal education is an American tradition and this county's strength; and WHEREAS, the students of today are the leaders of tomorrow; and WHEREAS, all citizens have a responsibility to support the public schools; NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia do hereby proclaim the week of November 15 - 21, 1987 as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK and urge all citizens to make a commitment to public education and to the future of Roanoke County children by visiting local public schools and by donating their time and talents to help make the public schools even better. A-111787-1 ITEM NUMBER "" f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COONTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAITORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Sewer Extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: d SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1985 Comprehensive Plan targeted the Bonsack area of the County as one of the prime growth areas. The 16 inch water line that is being installed in this area will further encourage growth. In order that this growth be in an orderly manner and to preclude the use of on-lot sewage disposal, staff feels that sewer should be extended from the existing Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460 at Carson Road. This sewer extension would be a sewer interceptor line which could be connected to or extended as part of development. This project would consist of 2,100 feet of 18 inch sewer line, and a 100 foot crossing of Route 460 as shown on the attached map. The estimated project cost is $100,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project would be from the 1974 sewer bonds which were approved to install sanitary sewer interceptors. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends the Board approve funding of this project and authorize the County Administrator to acquire and accept the required easements. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Cliffor ~ ig,.P.E. C Elmer C. Ho ge Utility Director County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Steven McGraw to approve staff recommendation VOTE No Yes Abs A. Brittle x Garrett _~ Johnson _~ McGraw ~ Nickens x ~'"~ ~ ~ - 6 p~ I ~~ ~ ~ \ 6i0 0• .. ~ . ~A~ pTl , ~ j ;~ ~ ~ VICINITY MAP _ __ I _ _. _ _. _ `~"~ \ P~~ IOSI v o 1055 1 J~~ S ,: i 609 0 610 OS 610 ~ ~J e, ~~v ~~~ ~ NORTH 60 °r e i° 701 _'~ )~ ~~ ~X 8o~soc~ ~~ IQTS DEPARTMENT OF PROPOSED EXTENSION OF GLADE CREEK PUBLIC FACILITIES INTERCEPTOR TO RTE. 460 A-111787-2 ITEM NUMBER ~' "'~°'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Sewer Extension to Serve Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This project is being proposed in two separate phases. Phase I of the project will be a line extension from the Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 758 (Carson Road). Phase II of the project would extend the line from Carson Road to Route 460 at Perimeter East (Trail Drive-In). A sewer line along this route is being of Perimeter East; however, to provide for line should be installed deeper and the pipe I of the project, the line size would be inc inch diameter and in Phase II, the line size inch to 15 inch diameter. planned by the developers future development, the size increased. In Phase reased from 8 inch to 21 would be increased from 8 Phase I of this project would consist of 1, 000 feet of 21 inch sewer line at an estimated cost of $45,000. Phase II would consist of 3,200 feet of 15 inch sewer line with an estimated cost of $65,200. The total County cost for Phase I and Phase II would be $110,200. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for Phase I of this project would be from the 1974 sewer bonds which were approved to install sanitary sewer interceptor. Phase II of the project would be funded from our revenue bonds to provide sewer service to industrial sites. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends the Board approve funding for both phases of this project and authorize the County Adminstrator to acquire and accept the required easements. 1 w._ ~ SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: _..~ ~ , e.~ Cliffor ig, P.E. ~ Elmer C. Ho ge Utility Director ------------------ County Administrator ----------------------------- --------- -------- ------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Steven A. Denied ( ) McGraw to approve staff Brittle x Received ( ) recommendation Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard John Chambliss 2 ITEM NUMBER ~=-- `-~',` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE VA, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Resolution requesting the Virginia Resources Authority to issue bonds on behalf of Roanoke County to finance utility capital improvements. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. This needs to be acted on at this meeting to meet the state schedule. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In the past several months, the Board of Supervisors has identified and approved several utility capital projects to be financed with bond proceeds. At the present time there remains $3,700,000 of unissued 1974 sewer general obligation bonds, which were authorized for the purpose of extending and expanding our present sewer system. Included in the 1986 water referendum were $1 million for system acquisitions; and there are several projects which will expand our present water system for the purpose of promoting development within the County. The attached schedule identifies these various projects, their anticipated costs and the proposed funding structure, which totals $5,495,000. Staff recommends that these water and sewer revenue and general obligation bonds be issued through the Virginia Resources Authority, an agency created by the General Assembly of Virginia in 1984, which is authorized to issue bonds and lend the proceeds to local governments to meet water supply, waste water treatment and drainage project needs. The Virginia Resources Authority enjoys a strong AA credit rating, which is the same rating the County enjoys for its general obligation bond issues. By pooling the bond issuance costs with other participating localities the net cost of this issue, because of its relatively small size, should be beneficial to the County of Roanoke. At its December Board meeting, the Virginia Resources Authority will consider requests for approximately $30 million from other localities across the state. Roanoke County desires to be a part of this issue for our $5,495,000 issue. The staff from the Departments of Management Services and Public Facilities are completing the requisite documents to allow the County to participate in said sale. The Board of Supervisors must also adopt the attached resolution authorizing the loan to be made ~. through the Virginia Resources Authority, to be considered at the December meeting. FISCAL IMPACT Monies for the debt service cost (principal and interest) are included in the water and sewer fund budgets for the 1987-88 fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted and that staff be authorized to complete the necessary documentation to participate at the December board meeting of the Virginia Resources Authority and subsequent issuance of said bonds. SUBMITTED BY: ,/John M. Chamblis Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED: /~ Elmer Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Attachments (2) cc: John Hubbard Cliff Craig Diane Hyatt Reta Busher Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY TO ISSUE BONDS ON BEHALF OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO FINANCE UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to apply to the Virginia Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximately $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the water and sewer projects of the County ("Project">. The loan will be evidenced by the General Obligation Bond Authority of the County of Roanoke, representing $3,700,000 for sewer public improvement bonds, authorized by the voters of Roanoke County in 1974; $1,000,000 of water public improvement bonds authorized in 1986 by the voters of Roanoke County and $795,000 of water revenue bonds of the County secured by a pledge of the revenues of the County's water system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit an application to the Virginia Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximately $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the project. The County Administrator is authorized to take such action as may be necessary or convenient to complete the application process. 2. That the final terms and conditions of the loan and the loan documents shall be subject to the approval of this board. . ~ i UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING Project Roanoke River Interceptor $ Ore Branch Interceptor Starkey Pump Station/ Force Main Castle Rock Sub-main Glade Creeic/460 Valleypointe Perimeter East/West Ruritan Road I & II System Expansion (sewer) Contingency (sewer) Cherokee Hills (System Acquisition) Forest Edge (System Acquisition) Carriage Hills (System Acquisition) Falling Creek/Bridlewood Water System Acquisition (Future) Valleypointe APCO Project ...,.~ SOURCE OF FUNDING 1974 Sewer 1986 Water New Water Referendum Referendum Revenue Bonds 300,000 400,000 1,000,000 100,000 150,000 420,000 180,000 950,000 200,000 $ 67,000 131,000 35,000 110,000 657,000 $3,700,000 $1,000,000 $ 580,000 215,000 $ 795,000 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION 111787-3 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY TO ISSUE BONDS ON BEHALF OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO FINANCE UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to apply to the Virginia Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximately $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the water and sewer projects of the County ("Project"). The loan will be evidenced by the General Obligation Bond Authority of the County of Roanoke, representing $3,700,000 for sewer public improvement bonds, authorized by the voters of Roanoke County in 1974; $1,000,000 of water public improvement bonds authorized in 1986 by the voters of Roanoke County and $795,000 of water revenue bonds of the County secured by a pledge of the revenues of the County's water system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit an application to the Virginia Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximately $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the project. The County Administrator is authorized to take such action as may be necessary or convenient to complete the application process. 2. That the final terms and conditions of the loan and the loan documents shall be subject to the approval of this board. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Virginia Resources Authority A-111787-4 ITEM NUMBER ~=~°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Report on request for additional sewer capacity by the Town of Vinton COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Town Council of Vinton has requested that Roanoke County assign 500,000 gallon per day of its' surplus capacity in the Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant and the Tinker Creek Interceptor for use by the Town of Vinton. Vinton's allocation in the Regional Plant is 1.62 million gallon per day and in the Tinker Creek Interceptor is 1.19 million gallon per day. The average sewage flow for the Town during the past 12 months was 1.8 million gallon per day. The actual sewage treatment plant allocation can not be changed until February, 1990, under the provisions of the 1972 sewage agreement. The reason for this request is that Vinton has exceeded their allocated capacity due to large volumes of infiltration and inflow encountered during this very wet year. The request also states that the additional capacity is required to enable new commercial and residential growth within the portions of Roanoke County that is within the Vinton sewer service area as defined by the 1979 County/Vinton utility agreement. The sewer facilities that are installed in parts of the County within the Vinton service area are owned by Roanoke County and operated by the Town of Vinton. Therefore, staff feels that the sewer flow from the County portions of the Vinton service area could be applied against the Roanoke County allocation within the treatment plant. ;.~ l..~ Roanoke County's excess capacity in the treatment plant is 2.7 million gallon per day using the first five months of 1987 flow data. During the next two years, Roanoke County will use an additional one million gallon per day, leaving an excess of 1.7 million gallon per day capacity by 1990. Roanoke County's capacity in the Tinker Creek Interceptor below Glade Creek, (this is the point Vinton sewage flow enters the system), is 4.11 million gallon per day. During peak month sewage flow, Roanoke County is using all but 342,000 gallon per day and d wring average flow, the County is using all but 1.25 million gallon per day. By the year 1990, it is anticipated that Roanoke County will use all but 142,000 gallon per day capacity in the Tinker Creek Interceptor. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton be notified that they can use an additional 142,000 gallon per day within the Tinker Creek Interceptor for the purpose of providing sewer flow from portions of the County that are within the Vinton service area. Staff recommends that both municipalities be notified that the additional sewage flow generated from portions of the County that are within the Vinton service area may be applied against the 9.0 million gallon per day allocation that Roanoke County has in the Regional Treatment Plant for capacity purposes only. Staff recommends that the Town of Vinton notify Roanoke County on a quarterly basis of the amount of sewage flow generated from portions of the County which are within the Vinton service area. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~ Lat- Cli rd Craig, P. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (X) Motion by: Harrv C. Nickens/Steven Denied ( ) A. McGraw to agprove staff Brittle x Received ( ) recommendation Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard A-111787-5 ~.... ITEM NUMBER ~- --' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request from the Va. Department of Transportation for Participation in road and sewer improvements for Starkey Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ',/~ J /.L~{_ /~ ~~ SUMMARY OF I RMATION: One of the highest priorities in the Six-Year Secondary Road Plan is the improvement of Starkey Road. This calls for the widening of Starkey Road to five lanes and improving Penn Forest Boulevard from Starkey to Chaparral Drive. The traffic count for this area has increased drastically, and now carries between 7725 to 13,170 vehicles per day. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has completed a preliminary design of these road improvements, and is ready to take the project to Richmond in December for funding. For the project to proceed, VDOT must have some direction from the County on two areas: road standards and drainage improvements. Starkey is now classified as an urbanizing road for construction standards and VDOT prefers to include curb, guttering and drainage improvements at the time of improvement. The project has been designed to include curb and guttering. The policy in effect since 1978 (see attached) requires localities to participate in these improvements. Costs to Roanoke County for Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard are as follows: Road Standards: 1. Rural Standards: The project can be redesigned to use road shoulders and drainage ditches rather than curb and guttering. This would not require any County participation, but would delay the project two years and requires an additional 30 feet of right-of-way which may eliminate several businesses along Starkey Road. 2. Curb and Guttering: The County participation for this option would be $72,300. 3. Curb, Guttering, and Sidewalk Right-of-Way: This option would provide curb and guttering and acquisition of right-of-way for future sidewalk construction at a cost of $161,800. Drainage Improvements: 1. No Improvements: The project can be constructed with the present natural drainage at no additional cost. 2. Detention Facility: Limited drainage improvements can be made by including detention facilities at a cost of $95,000 plus right-of-way. 3. Com lete Drainage Program: This would include an upgrade of the existing storm sewers to meet a 10 year storm design. This would require extensive changes through private property at a cost to the County of $306,726. FISCAL IMPACT: Should the County choose to participate in road standards or drainage improvements the funds would be expended in 1989-90 when the project is completed, but a commitment must be made now. An appropriation can be made from this year's fund balance, or some kind of participation program can be established whereby those properties adjoining the improved roads can be taxed as a Special Tax District for the amount of the improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends proceeding with the project with curb and guttering at a local cost of $72,300, contingent on the property owners' participation. The property owners would be notified of the improvements and the increased rates of their property, and the local shares pro-rated over the next three years as a supplemental assessment. Property owners can be notified at that time of options for drainage improvements and the pro rata share of those costs should they choose them. This requires funds to be escrowed rather than appropriated. This is a new approach to much needed road improvements and the concept has some details that must be worked out. Because of the precedent that will be set and the numerous other requirements for curb, guttering, etc, this approach allows the benefiting landowners to assume some of the cost rather than spreading it to all taxpayers in general. 2 1 Elmer C. od County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION (x) Motion by: Alan H. Brittle/Bob L. ( ) Johnson to approve staff ( ) recommendation VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle x Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry John Peters Fred Altizer 3 -----.~ Form hISD-3 (Rev. 7-74) VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY 1(ilEMORANI~UM • • • ~" SUBJECT: RELATIONS WITH OTHER AGENCIES, CITIES, TOWNS, COUNTIES NUMBER: DPM 8-6 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND RAILROADS - State Participation ~ sueERSEDES: the Cost of Constructing Sidewalks an torm veers D~ g_6 1 1 73 Deputy Commissioner APPRO DATE: ~~~ and Chief En ineer November 1 1978 SECTION 1.00 SECONDARY SYSTEM PROJECTS - 1.01 Outside the Corporate Limits of All Cities and Towns - 02 1 Where new sidewalks are desired and justified by traffic studies, . alI right-of-way necessary for the construction of the sidewalks, including the necessary widths for future road improvements, shall be furnished at no cost to the Secondary road funds. 03 1 One-half the construction cost of new sidewalks shall be borne by . Secondary road funds allotted for use in the county and one-half from funds other than highway funds. 1.04 The adjustment of any utilities necessitated by the construction of these sidewalks will be borne by Secondary road funds, except where the utilities are located on public property which has been dedi- cated or acquired for street or road purposes, including uses incidental thereto or other provisions whereby the utility owner would have to bear the expense of such relocation or adjustment. 1.05 Where the construction of curb and gutter is desired and results in the necessity for storm sewers, the cost of these storm sewers shall be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the basis of run-off ratios and percentages of participation as listed below: State Run-off from within right-of-way, 1000. Run-off from areas outside the road right-of-way and within the watershed common to the project, 250. Others: Run-off from areas outside the road right-of-way and within the watershed common to the project, 75%. 06 1 Diverted drainage from watersheds not common to the project shall . be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the rim-off ratios and percentages of participation as indicated below: State Run-off from the State right-of-way within the area of the diverted watershed, 100%. Others: Run-off from all areas in the diverted watershed, exclusive of State right-of-way, 1000. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION Form MSD-3a (Rev. 7- POLICY MEMORANDUM ~~.•i~ RELATION WITH OTHERS DPM 8-6 November 1 1978 SECTION 1.07 All storm sewer outfalls that are found necessary or desirable shall be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the run-off ratios and percentages of participation as indicated below:. State Run-off from the State's right-of-way within the area being drained, 1000. Others: Run-off from all areas other than the State's right-of- way in the area being drained, 1000. 1.08 Where, through zoning and development control ordinances, a county requires participation in off-site drainage and where their plan from an overall standpoint reasonably conforms to the above- established policy, the county's plan shall become the Highway and Transportation Commission's policy for that county. 1.09 Within the Corporate Limits of Towns of Less than 3,500 Population- 1.10 For all improvements on the Secondary System within towns of less than 3,500 population, the right-of-way, including the necessary drainage easements, shall be provided at no cost to the Secondary road funds. 1.11 Where new sidewalks are desired and justified by traffic studies, one-half the construction cost of the new sidewalks shall be borne by funds other than Secondary road funds. However, where the contemplated improvement requires the relocation of existing side- walks, these shall be replaced; and the total cost shall be borne by Secondary road funds. 1.12 The adjustment of utilities necessitated by the improvement will be borne by Secondary road funds, except where the utilities are located on public property which has been dedicated or acquired for street or road purposes, including uses incidental thereto, or where there are franchise or other provisions whereby the utility owner would have to bear the expense of such relocation or adjustment. 1.13 Existing storm sewers shall be relocated or replaced at no cost to others, Secondary road funds bearing 100 of the cost. .All new or additional storm sewers which are desired and are necessary for the development of adjacent property, and which fall within the right-of-way limits of Secondary route construction or improvement projects, shall be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the basis of run-off ratios and percentages of partici- pation as indicated on the following page: `- ~ ~ . 0 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION ~~ Form MSD-3a (Rtv. 7-74) POLICY MEMORANDUM ~ -~j~ RELATION WITH OTHERS ~ _DPD4 8-6 November 1, 1978 ~ SECTION State Run-off from within right-of-way, 100%. Run-off from areas outside the road right-of-way and within the watershed common to the project, 25%. Others: Run-off from areas outside the road right-of-way and within the watershed common to the project, 75%. 1.14 Diverted drainage from watersheds not common to the project shall be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the run-off and percentages of participation as indicated below: State Run-off from the State right-of-way within the area of the diverted watershed, 100%. Others: Run-off from all areas in the diverted watershed, exclu- sive of State right-of-way, 100%. 1.15 All storm sewer outfalls that are found necessary or desirable shall be financed from Secondary road funds and other sources on the run-off ratios and percentages of participation as indicated below: State Run-off from the State's right-of-way within the area being drained, 100%. Others: Run-off from all areas other than the State's right-of-wa; in the area being drained, 100%. 2.00 URBAN PROJECTS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF CITIES AND TOWNS ~V ~ - 2.01 All storm sewers both parallel and transverse and all appurten- antes, such as drop inlets, manholes, etc., that fall within the '~ right-of-way limits of urban improvement or construction projects on existing or new locations and are considered necessary for adequate project drainage by Department engineers will be financed i at the percentage required by law for the construction of the project; provided that all storm water to be conveyed is normal to the project limits and is not diverted from another watershed. 2.02 All storm sewers and outfalls constructed outside of the normal right-of-way limits of urban projects that are considered necessary for adequate project drainage by Department engineers ~;~ill be financed 50 percent from Federal and/or State funds and 50 percent on a rim-off ratio basis between State and City or Town funds; provided that the City's or Town's participation in the cost of such sewer or outfalls shall not be less than as required by law for construction. Available Federal funds may be used for State's share of cost due to run-off ratio. 6 ~`._... Julq 6, 1987 PO Eox 3071 Salem, Virginia 24153 re - 0904-Oa0-215,C501 Roanoke County Drainage Outfall Alternatives Coat Es tiraatos Mr. John Peters, P.E. Roanoke County Engineering Division PO Box 3800 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Dear John; A public hearing presentation is being prepared, showing; three drainage outfall alternatives that are necessitated by a:~ existing inadequate storm sewer across a private parking lot (Fralin and Ftaldron). Alternative #1 Ai)D SiJPPLEkiENTAL 54" PIPR TiiRU PARKING LOT The total cost of tie trunkline from the R.R. underpass to the lower side of Route 419 $434,121. Of this total, the amrns:~t of worF: outside the norFSal right of way $337,Ob1. ?3y the required r~~noff ratio policy tho county should p~ 91X of the $337,061 or an estimated $305 L726. Alternative #2 DET~"TION BASIN ADJACENT TO RAILROAD UNDEP.PASS The total cost of the detention basin and trunF:line to connect to the existing inadequate atom sewer under the parking lot ~ $144,231 plus tho right of way cost foz 3 lots approtimately 100'x100' each. Uf this total the work outside the normal right of way is estirated at $95,010 plus ri~`~t of gray. Alternative #3 IIFPLACE IN KIND EXISTING INADEQUATE CULVERT UNDER ROUTE 687 AND Tiiitil UNDERPASS This plan would have a culvert thru the underpass area then a 250' ditch on the south Ride of itoute fi87 from the underpass to the culvert under Route 687. Nc storm sewer outside of the right of way will be b~zilt anc~ zo cost apportionment beyond normal project funding would be involved. 7 P~a~ ~' Kr. John Patera Page 2 July 6, 1987 Alternatives 1 and 2 sill provide flood protection for the 10 year frequency storm. Any greater etorma sill overflow Route 687 and the adjscent parking lot and buildings as at present. Alternative /3 will essentially not change the existing flooding conditions. Alternative'!Il will require excavation 9'-24' deep thru the parking lot and a pipe to be tunneled under Route 419. Alternative fl will also increase flooding problems downstream of Route G19 in some subdivision areas. Alternative 02 will require the taking of private property that is ready for development but will not increase flooding problems downstream. Alternative #2 will have flood water ponded as much as 17' deep during a 14 yenr ettivefi2 willtalao requirenso~ mafntenancehwhich Roanokeround the basin. Alterna County has tentativelq agreed to accept. As discussed at the meeting in the District Office on July 1, 1987, it appease that Alternative i2 (detention basin) would be preferred if th® county rill t 1) Buy tha property for the basin Z) Assume responsibility for maintenance and liability on the basin 3) Pay the construction costs of the basin (estimated $95,010) Yvur prompt response will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, F. C. Altizer, Jr. Resident Engineer FCA:es cc - Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Mr. Alan H. Brittle Mr. B. W. Sumpter bcc - Mr. W. E. Wright 8 •e rr'w-~= ~~~~' "~7 ~y~: ~y ~„ i ~T1 ~< f ~ <~~, -'-y _~ +J'//d y t t~. Mw1L, .lY' 'ma`r DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 SOUTH BROAD STREET RA'Y D. PETFiTEL SALEM, 24153 COMMISSIONER October 26, 1987 G -`,~ 123~~ 'fi ~~ i.\ F. ~ ~~ 1 f. it -~. t `~ i ~ ~ :, F,J,.~,~,~C C~Jit'TY ." I ~.> ~~, `~~L l~ cc q~ttyy,, Q, `~~~ ~~'C~U~~Ob~ e. R. JR. DENT ENGINEER PO Box 3071 Salem, Virginia 24153 re - 0904-080-215,C501 (Starkey Road) Roanoke County Mr. John Peters, P.E. Roanoke County Engineering Division PO Box 3800 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Dear Mr. Peters: In our discussion regarding Project 0904-080-215,C501 (Starkey Road), I was asked to advise you of the funding required from Roanoke County to get the project moving. In view of the fact that Roanoke County chose to use Alternative ~~3 of the drainage proposal, as outlined in Mr. E. C. Cochran, Jr.'s, letter of July 6, 1987, and in accordance with DPM 8-6, it was estimated that Roanoke County's participation cost for drainage would be approximately- $72,300. Inasmuch as curb and gutter is to be constructed on this project, Roanoke County would be responsible, in accordance with DPM 8-6, Section 1.02, for right of way cost for the 5' sidewalk space. The cost for right of way for` the sidewalk would be $89,500. We need an agreement with the County for this participation, in order that the project plans can be signed and proceed to the right of way state. Please do all you can to expedite this agreement. Yours truly, ~-Z 30 0 8 G. E. Whiteside /~ // ~o o Assistant Resident Engineer for F. C. Altizer, Jr. Resident Engineer GEW:es 9 T?~ANSPORTATIUN FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ITEM NUMBER L.., " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request from the Va. Department of Transportation for allocation of funds for Starkey Road storm sewer project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors previously prioritized Starkey Road for improvements as part of the Secondary Road Six Year Plan. The Highway Department is ready to proceed with this project and has requested that the County participate in making drainage improvements if curb and guttering is required. Staff is working with VDOT at the present time, and will have a full report at the Board meeting on Tuesday. ~~ Elmer C. Ho e County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( > Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( > Garrett Referred Johnson To __ McGraw Nickens ~s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROPRIATION FOR ROANOKE COUNTY'S SHARE OF STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND FUNDING FOR SIDEWALK RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR STARKEY ROAD (ROUTE 904) PROJECT WHEREAS, Starkey Road Project (Route 904) provides an important urban highway link to commercial property in Roanoke County; and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors desires to improve this commercial link; and WHEREAS, Route 904 was placed on the Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan by the Roanoke County Board of Supervi- sors and was assigned a project number of 0904-080-215-C501, by the Virginia Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, Virginia Department of Transportation Policy Memorandum DPM-8-6 requires participation by localities for por- tions of storm sewer construction costs if curb and gutter "is desired" and for sidewalk rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has determined that the Roanoke Count Board of Supervisors is respon- D90`t sible for $72,300 on Project"6~1II~-080-215-C501 for its portion of storm sewer construction; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has determined that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is respon- a~I oy- sible for $89,500 on Project-S~6-080-215-C501 for its portion of sidewalk rights-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appropriate the sum of $161,800 for its share of the total construction cost and agree to the no-cost option for storm sewer outfalls for the Starkey Road Project 090-080-215-C501. A-111787-6 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Reappropriation of Funds COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It has been determined that $49,390 originally appropriated by the Board of Supervisors in account 16-6-60310-0-00000 will no longer be needed. Staff recommends that these funds be reappropriated to the Board of Supervisors' Contingency account as a reserve for future emergency spending requests. This will bring the balance of the Contingency account to approximately $50,000. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the above reappropriation of $49,390 be approved. APPROVED: ~-'~ Elmer C. odg County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Alan H. Brittle/Bob No Yes Abs Denied ( ) L. Johnson to approve staff Brittle x Received ( ) recommendation Garrett x Referred To Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x cc: File John Chambliss Reta Busher a rY~~.., A-111787-7 ITEM NUMBER ~' r1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINTSTRATION CENTER IN ROAIJOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to Replace Vehicles for the Library System and Procurement Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the fiscal year 1987-88 budget process, Procurement Services and the Libraries both requested new vehicles; however, due to budget constraints, these requests could not be funded within the allocated target amounts. The need for these vehicles persists because one vehicle was wrecked and the other is in very poor condition. The County Administrator now recommends replace- ment. The Director of Procurement needs to replace the 1977 Chevrolet sedan. It has 153,221 miles and is currently being used by the courier. This vehicle is not suitable for this purpose because there is no room for large boxes, hand trucks, and other bulky items. The Director of Libraries is currently driving a 1971 Ford station wagon. This vehicle is in constant need of major repairs, is unreliable, and gets poor gas mileage. Because the Director is required to travel back and forth between libraries, he needs a more reliable and efficient vehicle. These two new vehicles would cost approximately $23,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this request should be taken from the Landfill account. RECOMMENDATION: The County Administrator recommends the reappropriation of the above referenced monies and authorization to purchase said vehicles. SUBMITTED BY; JacJ~ Council Dir2ctor of Procurement Services APPROVED: ~~~- ' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Alan H. Brittle/Bob No Yes Abs Denied ( ) T. .7nhncnn o aiY rove ~ aff Brittle ~_ Received ( ) rAnnmmanr~atiori Garrett ~_ Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Jack Council Reta Busher George Garretson ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to Reschedule the Public Hearing on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Previously, the Board of Supervisors scheduled a Public Hearing for November 17 to discuss the proposed 1988-1994 Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan. Subsequently, staff was informed by VDOT that the preliminary construction plan must be reviewed by the VDOT Central Office in Richmond prior to a public hearing. Therefore, we request the Board to schedule the Public Hearing for December 15, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funds are involved. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board reschedule the Public Hearing to discuss the proposed Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan to December 15, 1987. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ Phillip Henry, E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~- ~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator ~~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION G-/ VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER ~_2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to reschedule Public Hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G~~v~iY~ .-~~4~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several properties are still involved in easement acquisitions for the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer in the area of Starkey Road. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing to acquire the easements, but at the present time six of the property owners may not agree to the easement acquisition. The request to reschedule is because property owners have to receive a written proposal with a certified appraisal to review and consider prior to receiving a notice of condemnation. The firm hired to complete these appraisals will not complete this work in sufficient time to allow for proper notification. The Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer project will allow elimination of the Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant and provide long term sewer capacity for the Back Creek sewershed. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that a public hearing be set for the December 15, 1987 Board Meeting to address the subject matter. APPROVED : ~ _ ''~' SUBMITTED BY: Phil ip T. Henry, P. Director of Engineer ng Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION ~i Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens 2 9 r ~ ~ngi,~l`' PENN FOREST ~ t ~i! - ~ ~ sK~cANO ao ~• `. cwC•' i~~ ~ ~' ~ m NUNTING ~. 3 i•"'"M(! r~14EA0~vlAprc '~ ' ¢ ~ ~' u. ~1 '/ b - °+ ' S ERN PI ~ o A /K IT;~~~4,A ~ ~~~/~ ~PP,TW OO S E~i~NOllOw~ ~~ f P ~J -. J -~~ 1LC0 RiD~ p1 `P ~J 1 ouaa.~t $ ~ ' THU T i ~ SI ~'~OUNiAIN^ ~ ~)... ~` /. '~/!,~~ C jTQ ~ r /~~`,,~ ~ ~ .. V' \~i " ~ MO_l1Ni N Dp ?Y ~ lV' % S y~ H y`$+ v 6 [LfM.SfN ~ ' dl l ~. + - - ~ - ~~ • ~ a ._-_~_ I _ JB BUCI( _MOUMAIN RO I ~ ~~ ~ ` ``~~ VICINITY MAP 9 N ~~~ NORTH 1_ MO JMTAIN G~ J HAYSTACK MT A DEPARTMENT OF EASEMENT AC UISITIONS FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITIES STARKEY FORE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER 1 i ITEM NUMBER ~~l- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE; November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• One year terms of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. 2. Health Department Board of Directors: Two-year term of Parker Foley. 26, 1987. Mr. Foley's term expires November 3. Human Services Committee: Two-year terms of Patricia Neal, Catawba Magisterial District; Lee Blair, Cave Spring Magisterial District; and Mary Anderson, Hollins Magisterial District. Their terms expire December 31, 1987. 4. Library Board: Four-year terms of Paula Winstead, Catawba Magisterial District; and Nancy Eddy, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Their terms expire December 31, 1987. 5. Planning Commission: Four-year term of Carolyn Flippen, Hollins Magisterial District. Her term expires December 31, 1987. 6. Recreation Commission: ~-//-~ Three-year unexpired term of Ed Reynolds, Vinton Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1988. See attached letter of resignation. Supervisor Nickens is nominating Roger L. Falls to fill the unexpired term, which expires June 30, 1988. His appointment will be confirmed under the Consent Agenda. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVE BY: ~~ ~°d . .~lit~/ g-~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. od e Deputy Clerk County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens ~--~ - / COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two members from each magisterial district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city served by a court service unit may appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. B. DUTIES: • Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other .laws relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations; Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of the court service program; Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory council to visit as often as the member conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving children under this law and to report to the court the conditions and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the participating governing bodies on the work of the council. • As the Youth and Fnmily Services Advisory Board: -~ Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive :..youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory ' capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act •• of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth development and to support the development of needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place determined at meetings. ~a s :~-: /~ HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Established by the Nancy M. Welch, Director, Alleghany Health District on October 31, 1985. Roanoke County will appoint one individual for a two year term. Meetings will be held four times per year. TERM TERM EXPIRES .B3. Parker Foley 2 years 3767 Kentland Dr :' Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Home: 989-1194 _ _ Work: 989-9500 C jj 3 ~/_ HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE PURPOSE To screen applications and make recommendation to the Board of Supervisors for the amount of money to be budgeted for human service agencies. TERMS Pursuant to the decision of the Board of Supervisors on February 26, 1985, terms are as follows: Catawba, Cave Spring and Hollins Magisterial District shall be one year terms; Windsor Hills and Vinton Magisterial District shall be two year terms. Thereafter, all terms shall be two years at the pleasure of the Board. ~-/- ~~, LIBRARY BOARD A. COMPOSITION (Code of Virginia 42.1-35) To consist of not less than five (5) members, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; representing each Magisterial District, members may serve 4 year terms, only two terms consecutively. B. DUTIES: For management and control of a free public library system. Has control of the expenditure of all moneys credited to the regional free library fund. Has the right to accept donations and bequests of money, personal property or real estate for the establishment and maintenance of such regional free library system or endowments for same. Has authority to execute contracts for the purpose of administering a public library service with the region. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Fourth Wednesday of each month, 5:30 p.m., Headquarters Library Route 419. ~-/- ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION: (Summarized from State Code 15.1-437) To consist of not less than five (5),nor more than fifteen (15) members, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; all shall be residents of the county or municipality, qualified by knowledge and experience to make decisions on questions of community growth and development. One members may be a member of the governing body, and one may be a member of the administrative branch. B. DUTIES: To exercise general supervision of, and make regulations for the administration of its affairs; Prescribe rules pertaining to its investigations and hearings; Supervise its fiscal affairs and responsibilities, under rules and regulations prescribed by the governing body; Keep a complete record of its proceedings and be responsible for the custody and preservation of its papers and documents; Make recommendations and an annual report to the governing body concerning the operation of the commission and the status of planning within its jurisdiction; Prepare, publish and distribute reports, ordinances and other material relating to its activites; Prepare and submit an annual budget in the manner prescribed by the governing body of the county; If deemed advisable, establish an advisory committee or committees . C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Third Tuesday of each month at 7:30 p.m., Roanoke County Administration Center. s / ' RECREATION COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985) To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial district and one (1) member at large from the County. All members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Original terms shall be staggared. Upon expiration of their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3) years, expiring on June 30th. B. DUTIES: The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke-County; the Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors through the Director of Parks and Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in this resolution. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between - - the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors, and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters. The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies, programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and - disposing of lands and properties related to the total community i ~ recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for. recreation. '" "~i',~•~~:-~,~ • ~ - '~ The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation '`-"'``~" ~- ., ; :.. '•- purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the :~ establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the a~~•:• County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds, ~;~ recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and r~:~..,-. -r.... . `~•~~ structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the ' .~,,;~.•"==':~ . ~ County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may ~~.°~~:~:a~: = suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and ~~ for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures ., as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any • ~ grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation. Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise •of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4) and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department function, and will advise in regard to other recreation facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or ~• loaned to the unit. 4033 Slandfield Drive, Vinton, Virginia ~1?9.~ august 11, 198? Roanoke County Parks and Recreation 1206 :•Cessler `gill Road Salen, Virginia ?1+153 ' Attention:';dr. Steve Carpenter Dear qtr. Carpenter: • In accordance with our conversation of Sionday morning, August 11,• please accept my resignation from the Recreation Commission. As i P.ad explained our area is short of people to assist in sports programs, so the denands of coaching three sports locally; plus r~:•.<. •, some on the fob travel, leaves little t3ae to devote to other activ- • ities. Sincerely, ~_. T ~ ~~ • ?d Reynolds • ~~~s,, ,.` '~ y' PVG ~ ~C~l~~ ~, ~ - ,, ~ / AMENDED 7/21/88 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION N0. 111787-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 17, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 13, 1987 2. Request from the Town of Vinton to designate Larry A. Logan to act as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton. 3. Acceptance of water facilities serving an office building on Centurion Road. 4. Approval of Resolution requesting the Va. Department of Transportation to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 and Route 1905 into the Secondary System as a Rural Addition. 5. Acceptance of easements, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, Mental Health Services Board of Directors, Recreation Commission. 7. Request from the City of Roanoke to prepay annexation indebtedness with Roanoke County. 8. Settlement of Board of Supervisors v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and disbursal of settlement proceeds. 9. Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements and road right-of-way -- _~~.. being dedicated to the County - Southwest Industrial Park. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ..J~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File Tommy Fuqua, Fire Chief Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator ~-9 AT A REGULAR MEETING DFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRP,TOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL NOVEMBER 17, 1987 CENTER ON TUESDAY, RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 17, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1, Minutes of Meeting - October 13, 1987 2, Requestnf~oomacteasoHazardoustMate~ials1Coordinator A. Loga for the Town of Vinton. 3, Acceptance of water facilities serving an office building on Centurion Road. 4, Approval of Resolution requesting the Va. Department of Transportation to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 and Route 1905 into the Secondary System as a Rural Addition. 5, Acceptance of easements, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards. 6, Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory CounMentaluHealth Family Services Advisory Board, Services Board of Directors, Recreation Commission . 7. Request from the City of Roanoke to prepay annexation indebtedness with Roanoke County. ~-9 8. Settlement of Board of Supervisors v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co ., and disbursal of settlement proceeds. g. Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements and road right-of-way easements being dedicated to the County - Southwest Industrial Park. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. t goo October 13, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 13, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1987. ~~ IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 2:06 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle, Steven A. McGraw MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 2:10 p.m.) STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Community Development; Paul M'. Mahoney, ~U .. ~ :~ October 13, 1987 County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Stephen Carpenter, Director of Parks and Recreation; Gardner Smith, Director of General Services; George Garretson, Library Director; Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist; Reta Busher, Director of Management and Budget; Diane :Hyatt, Director of Finance. IIN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Branan G. Thompson, Colonial Avenue Baptist Church. Allegiance was recited by all present. IIN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS The Pledge of Chairman Johnson announced that as a result of a ruling on the Blue Laws by a judge in Roanoke City, the Commonwealth's Attorney has met with the judges and researched the ruling, and has scheduled a press conference on Wednesday, October 14, 1987 to discuss this issue. Elmer Hodge added that staff has talked with the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office and the merchants association in the Roanoke Valley to determine their feelings on this issue. Mr. Hodge also asked Assistant County Administrator John Cham bliss, to introduce Donnie G. Myers, the new Director of Management Information Systems. ,<.~ " :2 ~.-2 October 13, 1987 `" IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS Don Reid of C & P Telephone Company gave a brief update on the transition to the 911 system in the Roanoke Valley. He also presented memento 911 baseball caps to the board members, the County administrator, the County A ttorney, and County staff members who worked on the implementation of the 911 system. IN RE: NEW BOSINESS 1. Adoption of the Economic Development Strategy: Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist, reported that they have identified _ .._ items which the County uses that are visible promotional tools of Roanoke County including pins, brochures, newsletters, certificates of appreciation, and sesquicentennial cups. He pointed out that the economic development strategy had previously been discussed in a work session. In response to a question at that time, the Valleypointe development will change the residential/commercial-industrial ratio to 82/18 upon completion of Phase I. Phase II will change the ratio to 78/22 ratio, if residential growth remains stable. ,, I`i ~ „~ October 13, 1987 Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the Economic evelopment Strategy. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None RESOLUTION 101387-1 APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke unty, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, economic and industrial development is a valid rpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, economic development is both a program and a rocess that is an important function of local government; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Strategy outlines the formal activities and the direction of County efforts in economic elopment during 1987-88; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Super- isors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the Economic Development Strategy proposed by~ he Roanoke County Economic Development Division of the Depart- t of Development dated October, 1987, is hereby approved; and 2. That its mission is to stimulate and encourage velopment and the creation of wealth which produces revenue and ovides jobs within Roanoke County; and ~U4 October 13, 1987 3. That the .establishment of goals and the develop ment of the objectives will focus Roanoke County's economic devel opment efforts for 1987-88. These goals and objectives compris the herein adopted Economic Development Strategy; and 4. That these goals and objectives include: (a) Continued expansion of the local economy t meet changing patterns of the State's and th Nation's economy; (b) Retention and expansion of existing Indus tries, small businesses, and the servic sector, where the greatest growth in new jo and investment are already occurring; (c) Attraction of new capital intensive busi nesses and industries that produce jobs and have a net fiscal benefit for Roanoke County; (d) Attraction of new industries and businesses that respect the environment and represent a positive improvement for Roanoke County; (e) Encourage new and existing businesses and industries to provide a livable wage, diversi- fied job opportunities, upward mobility and training and re-training opportunities; and (f) Assist local industries and businesses in the expansion of international trade. ~~~.. October 13, 1987 2. Approval to change board meeting dates in November and December Approval of this report will change the board meeting dates to November 17, 1987 at 3 pm, December 1, 1987 at 2 Ilpm, and December 15, 1987 at 3 pm. Supervisor Johnson moved to change the board meeting Ildates for November and December. The motion was seconded by (Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 101387-2 PRESCRIBING A CHANGE IN THE MEETING DATES FOR THE MONTHS OF NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER WHEREAS, by Resolution R1-5-87-1 adopted on January 5, '.1987, the Board of Supervisors established a meeting schedule for the Board for calendar year 1987; and WHEREAS, in order to accommodate the public business, and the convenience of the citizens as it relates to the various public holidays in November and December, this meeting schedule is hereby amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution R1-5-87-1 establishing a certain eting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is ereby amended by canceling the meetings scheduled for Jovember 10, 1987; November 24, 1987; December 8, 1987; and r i ~~~~ o~ s October 13, 1987 December 22, 1987; and rescheduling the meetings of the Board f November 17, 1987; December 1, 1987; and December 15, 1987. 2. That the meeting hereby scheduled for November 17,. 1987, shall commence at 3:00 p.m. and public hearings at 7:00. p.m.; the meeting scheduled for December 1, 1987, shall commen d at 2:00 p.m.; the meeting scheduled for December 15, 1987, shall) commence at 3:00 p.m. and public hearings at 7:00 p.m. These meetings shall be held at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue; and 3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy o this Resolution to be posted at the Courthouse, the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County library, and advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 27, 1987, and November 3, 1987. Approval of program concept for the Roanoke Regional Airport Renovation Project: Director of Finance Dian Hyatt announced that the Regional Airport Commission ha presented an outline of the entire scope of the airpor renovation project. This shows a total expenditure budget o $25,587,000 based upon low bids which were opened on August 13 1987. The outline also shows funding sources. $7.3 million wil be financed by the Regional Airport Commission, the cost bein shared by County. The Regional Airport Commission is requesting support for the entire scope of the project by resolution. ~.'O . ~,. October 13, 1987 -~ Chairman Johnson pointed out that the cost of the rminal is only $9,487,477 of the entire amount. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the airport concept nd the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by upervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None Mr. Hodge inquired whether the City and County must ove the issuance of the bonds? County A ttorney Paul Mahoney esponded that he understands both localities will approve the issuance of the bonds. Supervisor Johnson also responded that he plans to ask the Airport Commission to begin steps to get an independent financial consultant and bond counsel. RESOLUTION 101387-3 APPROVING A CERTAIN CAPITAL EXPENDITURE BY THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION UPON CERTAIN . TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between the ~ity of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport ommission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit or approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 benefit five or more accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by report dated October 7, 1987, a copy of hich is on file with the Deputy Clerk, the Roanoke Regional airport Commission has submitted a request that the County 208 October 13, 1987 approve a capital expenditure by the Commission for the Airport Terminal Development Project in a proposed budget amount of $25,587,477 as set forth in said report, including the following expenditures: 1. A contract with J. M. Turner and Company, Inc. in the amount of $9,487,800 for the new terminal development build- ing construction contract. 2. A contract with alternates up to the amount of $8,687,112 with Branch Highways, Inc. for the new terminal devel- opment site development. 3. An amendment to the engineering agreement for term- final development in an amount not to exceed $961,000 with Delta Associates, P.E.; each of the foregoing three expenditures being more specifically set forth in the aforesaid report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors that the aforesaid capital expenditures by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, as more particularly set forth in the aforesaid report, are hereby approved, and the County Administrator and Deputy Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any further documentation in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. 4._ Report on the Valleypointe Development Project: Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reviewed the 2~9~~ October 13, 1987 ~~planned development project which consists of 252 acres known as the Harris-Moomaw property which will be Phase I, and 200 acres ~~owned by Adams Construction Company which will be Phase II. The County is working with the Regional Airport Commission for approval for an access road through a portion of the extended Airport Clear Zone. There is a tentative agreement worked out involving an exchange of land. Whatever acreage is included in the clear zone ., the Airport Commission will receive a like amount of land, known as the Ida May Holland property. Roanoke County's commitment to the development includes Ithe purchase of up to 10 acres of property at $250,000 and water and sewer extension at a cost of $1,250,000. At this time, staff i is recommending that an appropriation of $1,000 from the Board contingency fund is necessary for a binder for the Ida May Holland property. Supervisor Johnson asked if there will be proffers gadded to the rezoning request of the developer of the project. Mr. Gubala responded that the proffers will be provided at the hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Hodge pointed out that many conditions will be included in the contract between the County and the developer. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: X10 October 13, 1987 AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 5. Request from Valley Metro to extend service from Roanoke City Line to Cave Spring Corners: Assistant Count Administrator John Chambliss reported that several businesse along Brambleton Avenue have requested that Valley Metro exten its service from the City line to a point closer to Cave Sprin Corners. Valley Metro has studied this and has agreed to exte the service. They anticipate revenues of $200 and would realiz an annualized deficit of $4800. Valley Metro proposes that trial route be established November 1, 1987 until June 30, 1988 at which time the County and Valley Metro can discuss th continuation of the service . The Roanoke .Valley Orthopedi Center on Route 419 would like the route extended to thei facility, but Valley Metro felt this might be prohibitive at thi time but will investigate the practicality of this extension. Supervisor Nickens suggested that this item be postpone until November 17 so he could discuss this with the Rehabilitative Services and the Orthopedic Center how the $400 a month cost be reduced. Supervisor Brittle also requested this be postponed so it can be discussed with the Brambleton Avenue Association. ~f~ s. ..r October 13, 1987 Supervisor Brittle moved to postpone this issue until) November 17th. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Chambliss to convey this action to Valley Metro and inform them that the Board supports extension of the route. He also directed Mr. Chambliss to meet ~ ith Supervisors Brittle and Nickens to expedite the matter. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 6987-9 authorizing ty Administrator to_accept the donation or dedication of tility and right-of-way road. easements and improvements. therein: Mr. Mahoney advised that this ordinance is similar to the ordinance approved on June 9, 1987 which streamlined the process for acceptance of non-controversial real estate matters, specifically utility easements and road right-of ways. Under this ordinance, these matters are placed on the Consent Agenda for approval rather than the first and second reading process. 'Staff is suggesting that this ordinance be amended to include idrainage easements and other non-controversial items such as fee .simple dedication or donation of well lots. 212 October 13, 1987 Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of th ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, an carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Cha ~r 20.1 of the 1971 Roanoke ~ Count Code "Water" and Ordinance No. 84-108 b addin subsection (e) "De osits" establishin a schedule to de osits for initial institution and reinstitution of sewer and water service: This ordinance will amend the County Code and establish new water and sewer deposit rates and reinstitution of service deposit rates. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Nickens noted that he agreed with Mr. Hodge that hopefully utility billings will be handled monthly instead of quarterly in 1988. ~~ 2 ~~ 3 October 13, 1987 ORDINANCE 101387-5 AMENDING CHAPTER 20.1, OF THE 1971 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "WATER," AND ORDINANCE N0. 84-1081, BY ADDING SUBSECTION (e) "DEPOSITS," ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF DEPOSITS FOR INITIAL INSTITUTION, AND REINSTITUTION OF SEWER AND WATER SERVICE WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of Ithe Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing) concerning this amendment was held on September 22, 1987; a sec-~ fond reading was held on October 13, 1987; and WHEREAS, nonpayment of sewer and water charges has bee n ~a significant burden on county utility revenues; and .. WHEREAS, the recording of .liens on the property re-~ ceiving the uncompensated service does not provide a prompt reme- for the delinquent charges; and WHEREAS, the present deposit rates do not provide suffi- cient funds to offset the amount of delinquent accounts. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of, noke County, Virginia, that Chapter 20.1, "Water," of the 1971 oke County Code (now Chapter 22 of the 1985 Roanoke County is hereby amended as follows: CHAPTER 20.1 WATER ARTICLE II. WATER SYSTEMS DIVISION 2. COUNTY WATER SYSTEM * * * * II ~. 2 ~. 4 October 13, 1987 (e) Deposits (1) The followin char es shall be im osed as security deposits when request for service is made: Sewer Only - $50.00 Residential Water, Water and Sewer - $25.00 Commercial Water, Water and Sewer - $100.00 (2) If any utility customer at any time failed to ke his account current, resulting in discontinuance of service, that customer shall pay an additional deposit according to the follow ing schedule for reinstitution of service. This de osit shall be required in addition to that required by subsection (a) and the turn-on charge required by Section 20.1-31. Additional Connection Deposit Sewer Only $ 50.00 5/8" Connection 75.00 3/4" Connection 75.00 1" Connection 100.00 1 1/2" Connection 150.00 2" Connection 200.00 3" Connection 300.00 4" Connection 400.00 6" Connection 500.00 2 ~ +5 . . October 13, 1987 3) The deposits required by subsections (a) and (b) within sixty (60) days of discontinuance of service provided that all charges have been will be refunded, without interest paid in full. (4) The effective date of this amendment shall be January 1, 1988. 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the conveyance of surplus real estate of Washington Avenue in the (Town of Vinton: This ordinance authorizes conveyance of a right-of-way to the Department of Transportation which is needed for the widening of Washington Avenue. The state .has offered $7,750 for the acquisition, relocation of a sign, landscaping, concrete walk, brick retaining wall and any and all damages. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the, following recorded vote: II AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 101387-6 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE ON WASHINGTON AVENUE IN THE TOWN OF VINTON BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 2~ ~ October 13, 1987 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de Glared to be surplus and is being made available for other publi uses, i.e. a public street; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning th sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate wa held on September 22, 1987; a second reading was held on Octobe 13, 1987; and 3. Tha t this real estate is located on Washington Ave nue and consists of 3,550 square feet in permanent easement an 1,820 square feet in temporary easement; and 4. That the offer of the Virginia Department of Trans - portation in the amount of $7,750.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney 3. Ordinance amending and reenacting the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow certain office and•commercial .. 2.1:"7. October 13, 1987 uses within an M-1 District upon special exception: This ordinance reflected the policy in the Roanoke County Land Use Plan of allowing selected office and commercial uses within the B-2 zoning district to locate within the M-1 district if the Board of Supervisors grants a Special Exception. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The emotion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson INAYS: None ORDINANCE 101387-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW CERTAIN OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL. USES WITHIN AN M-1 DISTRICT UPON SPECIAL EXCEPTION WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on September 22, 1987, and the second reading) i on this ordinance was held on October 13, 1987; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general wel- fare, and good zoning practice requires and supports this amend- ment; and WHEREAS, this amendment conforms with the Roanoke County Land Use Plan, and is consistent with the policies con-~ tained therein by encouraging retail and office development in industrial areas. Specifically, this amendment allows selected ,~ 2.1 g , October 13, 1987 office and commercial uses permitted within the B-2 district t locate within the M-1 district with a special exception; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearin on this amendment on September 1, 1987, and it•recommende approval; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-491 of the 1950 Code of Virginia as amended, and Chapter 9 of the Charter of the County of Roanok authorizes this amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Cod is amended and reenacted as follows: 1. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke-County Zoning Ordin ance, Section 21-24-1 by revising sub-section A by the additio of a new sub-sub-section (15) to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-24 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS 21-24-1 M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT A. Permitted uses enumerated. ~ ' 15) Any use permitted in the B-2 General Commercial District as well as nursery schools and day-care centers that are directly supportive of area industrial facilities, provided a special ex ception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall b October 14, 1987. 21 ~9~`~. October 13, 1987 IIN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for Condemnation of easement for Hollins Community Development Project: Mr. Mahoney announced that this issue has been resolved and the County has received the executed and notarized deed from Mattie Moore Johnson. Therefore, the Public Hearing has been canceled. IIN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Brittle requested a report on the status on the repair of the tennis courts at Cave Spring High School,' which are County courts on school property. He also requested ~Mr. Gubala to investigate the development in Hunting Hills and work with the developer to inform the residents in the area. Supervisor McGraw announced that Bev Waldo from Youth Haven II had received a letter from the state with a positive report on the facility. Supervisor Nickens requested an Executive Session ion matters concerning contractual, legal and real estate and personnel. Supervisor Johnson expressed concern at the misinformation and false statements in a letter to the editor 2 2 `4 October 13, 1987 published in the newspaper concerning the new communication) equipment. He requested the appropriate staff to correct the information. Mr. Hodge advised that this system is the same asl as Roanoke City is using. It is totally compatible and is expandable. The present system will last through the year 2000. The maker of the old system went out of the business in 1978 and the County has been buying second-hand parts to maintain the system. Sherman Cable, Ron Edwards and Art LaPrade, who worked on the new system were available for further information. Mr. Cable stated he thought the employees were happy with the system and the coverage is good. Supervisor Nickens presented other history involved inI the decision to purchase Motorola equipment. He also voice d support of a central public safety facility. Chairman Johnson directed the County Administrator to prepare a response to ensure that the citizens are aware of the accurate facts surrounding the decision to purchase Motorola equipment. IIN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Chairman Johnson requested that Item 8 be removed from the Consent Agenda and referred to the County A ttorney for study and a response. Supervisor McGraw moved that a request from the ~2 2=,~ ~ October 13, 1987 Mason Cove Elementary School PTA for a Bingo Permit be a and added to the Consent Agenda subject to recommendation by th Commissioner of Revenue. Supervisor McGraw moved to add this request to th Consent Agenda as Item 9. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 8 deleted and referred to the County Attorney. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION NO. 101387-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of th Board of Supervisors for October 13, 1987, designated as Item M Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 2~2-~ October 13, 1987 1. Minutes of Meeting - August 25, 1987, September 8 1987, September 22, 1987 2. Resolution approving the relocation of Route 1815. 3. Resolution approving the change of route number of Coachman Drive. 4. Request for acceptance of Whipplewood Drive int VDOT Secondary System. 5. Request for acceptance of Whispering Wind Driv into VDOT Secondary System. 6. Request for acceptance of Millwheel Drive an Millbridge Road into VDOT Secondary System. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities servin Castle Rock West, Section 3. ', 8. Request Next Eextxtnn~ty Sel~ee~ €e~ ee~t~t~eat~ar to the B~d~s~en of Moter 8eh~e~es €o~ re€~nel e~ taffies. 9. Approval of Bingo Permit for the Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorizes and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of sai items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant this resolution. RESOLUTION 101387-8.a CONCURRING IN THE RELOCATION OF STATE ROUTE 1815 ( LA MARRE STREET) -- WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportatiot (VDOT> through its Resident Engineer has requested Roanok County's concurrence by letter dated September 18,.1987, in the relocation of State Route 1815 (LaMarre Street); and 2.~~~}. October 13, 1987 _~_-- - -- --------------- --- ----- -a .- WHEREAS, said relocation is a portion of the project idening Route 11 (Williamson Road), and will create a safer intersection at the entrance to Hollins College and Route 1815 ~(LaMarre Street); and WHEREAS, the plans for this project will relocate Route 815 (LaMarre Street) approximately 120 feet to the east of its esent intersection with Route 11 (Williamson Road); and WHEREAS, County staff has reviewed this proposal and ecommends approval thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- ors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Roanoke County hereby approves and concurs in the relocation of Route 1815 (LaMarre Street) in conjunction with Project 0011-080-105, PE 102, Route 11, Roanoke County. 2. That the funding for this relocation of Route 1815 (LaMarre Street) is included in the primary road allocation for route 11 (Williamson Road), and will have no fiscal impact upon the County's general fund. 3. That the County Administrator is directed to for- rd a certified copy of this resolution to the VDOT Commis- Toner, Roy D. Pethel, and the Resident Engineer, F. C. Altizer, r. RESOLUTION 101387-8.b CONCURRING IN THE RENUMBERING OF STATE ROUTE 1055 (COACHMAN ~. i DRIVE) 22~ October 13, 1987 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportatior. (VDOT), through its Resident Engineer, has requested Roanoke County's concurrence by letter dated September 4, 1987, in the renumbering of a .20 mile section of State Route 1055 (Coachman Drive) to State Route 610; and WHEREAS, said renumbering will provide route numbering continuity in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, County staff has reviewed this proposal and recommends approval thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Roanoke County hereby approves and concurs in the renumbering of a .20 mile section of State Route 1055 (Coach- man Drive) to State Route 610 from Coachman Drive (Rt. 1055) and Sourwood Street (Rt. 1051) intersection to Ruritan Road (Rt. 609) and West Ruritan Road (Rt. 610) intersection. 2. That the renumbering of a .20 mile section of State Route 1055 (Coachman Drive) will have no fiscal impact upon the County's general fund. 3. That the County Administrator is directed to for- ward a certified copy of this resolution to the Virginia Depart- ment of Transportation Commissioner, Roy D. Pethel, and the Resi- dent Engineer, F. C. Altizer, Jr. 2 ~- October 13, 1987 RESOLUTION 101387-8.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WHIPPLEWOOD DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke) County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Whipplewood Drivel ~to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section 1, Branderwood Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 351, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 4, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby. guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Whipplewood Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said I,street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2 2_ ~ October 13, 1987 RESOLUTION 101387-8.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WHISPERINGWIND DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT O TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon th proceedings herein, and upon the application of Whisperingwind Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section 3, Cherokee Hills Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 47, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 18, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Whisperingwind Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, :: -~~2'~ October 13, 1987 only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. RESOLUTION 101387-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MILLWHEEL DRIVE AND MILLBRIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ~~County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon they proceedings herein, and upon the application of Millwheel Drive and Millbridge Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Woodbridge, Sections 6,7,and 8 Subdivision which maps were recorded in Plat Book 9, Pages 175,249 and 310, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 21, 1980, May 11, 1983 and December 17, 1984 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 2 ~2 '8 October 13, 1987 3. Tha t said roads known as Millwheel Drive and Millbridg Road and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying thi Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as publi roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highway in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of officia acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Departmen of Transportation . IN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed. 1. Development Data Report IN RE: RECESS At 3:05 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a five minutes recess . IN RE: RECONVENEMENT At 3:15 p.m. Chairman Johnson reconvened the meeting. IN RE: WORR SESSION A r ~~~` ~3~ October 13, 1987 1. Secondar y Hi ghway Six Year Plan: Assistant Director of Engineering John Peters reported that the six year plans was approved about a year and a half ago. The plan was) based on 1.2 million dollars. As a result of General Assembly action last year, the County now has $2.3 million. Mr. Peters presented a list of new projects that have been requested by the citizens of the County. Several projects are not included in the list including Route 1832, Olsen Road. Realignment would provide access to the Valleypointe development project Phase II. Another project is Fallowater Lane. Supervisor McGraw asked what effect industrialization of some areas would have on the prioritization. Mr. Peters responded that it would have a higher priority, but there are limited funds and over one-third of the County's roads need improvement. Mr. Peters asked that the Board members let him know of other projects they might like in the six-year plan. Supervisor Johnson responded he would like to have entrance and egress for the residents in Boxley Hills during the realignment and extension of Verndale or to find a back way out of Boxley Hills . Supervisor McGraw requested that the access road off Bradshaw Road onto Route 311 be improved for public safety) reasons. Mr. Peters responded that the City of Roanoke and', 1 i Highway Department will be getting a stop light for Woodhaven) .. -> ~~,~ October 13, 1987 Drive and Peters Creek Road. Supervisor Garrett asked i anything was going to be done to the lower part of Cresthil Drive. Mr. Peters replied that the Highway Department has don the survey work and made a recommendation, and this will be adde to the next plan. Mr. Hodge asked if the access road to Valleypointe coul be added to the Six-year plan if there are not enough qualifyin industries for industrial access funds. Mr. Peters responde that new roads can not be added to the six-year plan, and th only alternatives are industrial access or rural addition funds. Supervisor Nickens moved to set a public hearing on th Six-Year Plan for November 17, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. The motion wa seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the followin recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 3:50 p.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to go intc Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (1) to consider a personnel matter, (2) to consider a real estate matter, (4) to discuss location of a perspective business or industry and (6) to discuss a legal matter. The motion was _- ~ ~ ~~ ;. October 13, 1987 seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:30 p.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: RECESS At 5:31 p.m. Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess. IN RE: EVENING SESSION At 7:00 p.m. Chairman Johnson reconvened the meeting. IN RE: WORK SESSION 2. Drainage: Chairman Johnson announced that there are 10 community meetings scheduled in various areas of the County to discuss drainage problems with the citizens. He also l l ~: October 13, 1987 announced that Supervisor Brittle had a prior commitment an would be leaving at 7:10 p.m. Mr. Hodge a dvised that the staff would bring the board to date on recent changes, and outline the plans for the futur concerning both drainage and the sewer problems. Director of Utilities Clifford Craig reported that th sanitary sewer system was designed to convey sanitary sewag from the properties to the wastewater treatment plant. It wa not designed to convey stormwater or groundwater. Whe stormwater goes into the sewer line, it causes the sewer t overflow. The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Evaluatio Rehabilitation Program is to reduce the amount of ground Ovate that gets into the sewer program. The program was implemented i the Back Creek area in October 1986. Upon completion of tha project, ,they moved to the Murray Run sewer shed, and will begi the Mudlick sewer shed. These projects will run through 1994. Supervisor Johnson asked if it would be better to doubl the effort. Mr. Craig said they are considering accelerating th program at a cost of $600,000 per year. Supervisor McGraw aske if the projects were chosen based on the severity of the area Mr. Craig responded that the number of times there is sewe backup is more important than the severity. Director of Engineering Phillip Henry reported on th storm drainage problems throughout the County. He outlined the ~~. October 13, 1987 - - - - -- --- ------------- -- - -- _ --- ------_ - --- __ r II ~~ ^_ _ ___~ action that the County has taken following the report presented in May 1987. He also presented the major drainage concerns in the County and the estimated costs to resolve the problems. He announced that the staff has a prepared a program for addressingindividual drainage complaints that they receive. Mr. Hodge asked if there is a review of drainage when an individual home is built, or is drainage review limited to subdivisions only., Mr. Henry responded that building permits are not issued within designated floodplains, but review such as this. comes under the Department of Development. Individual sites are not checked for drainage review. Dr. Nickens pointed out that an individual cannot make improvements to his site which cause drainage problems on other home sites. Mr. Hodge inquired if there will be a need for additional staff to handle the field inspection process. Mr. Henry answered there is presently a temporary inspector partially handling this. He did not anticipate a need for additional staff under the present development. It may be necessary for additional staff .for individual residential or commercial site inspection, or they may require the developer to pay the cost for a private survey firm certify the criteria to the County. Mr. Henry presented the current projects that the County has completed or are in process. The two major items are ;_ .• ~ Q October 13, 1987 improvements to the Sun Valley-Palm Valley area and th Willowlawn-South Park Circle area. Supervisor Johnson expressed concern about the City o Roanoke's drain that dumps into Palm Valley. He directed th staff to pursue studies with the City concerning the 60 inc drain. Mr. Henry responded they had made contact with the Cit already and will be meeting with them. Mr. Henry. announced they had met with the citizens i both areas and received both positive and negative comments. Mr Hodge pointed out that the drainage program is less than tw years old, and until that time nothing was done about th problems. He recommended that the staff continue to work o these two projects, with the understanding that the County wil study the other problems for the future. Supervisor Nickens advised that there are 10.3 millio dollars of drainage needs identified and we only have $200,000 at this time. At some point the County is going to have to move more assertively and make more progress. Supervisor Johnsor, responded that we are making progress in a relatively short time, considering the problems began 40 years ago. Mr. Hodge reported that in addition to the two majo projects, a complaint system has been devised on every call complaint they receive. These will be cataloged for futur drainage projects . Within the next two or three .months the •K y, October 13, 1987 should have a better picture of future projects. Supervisor Johnson asked Mr. Henry if the County is working with the state on an ongoing basis concerning drainage. Mr. Henry answered that they are working with the Highway Department on these, and they forward these types of complaints to the state. Supervisor ~~McGraw advised that the state has been responding and has been working on the problem on Route 460. At 8:10 p.m. Supervisor Brittle returned to the meeting. The following citizens spoke concerning their drainage ~~and sewer backup problems: 1. Earl Watkins, 1803 Elbert Drive, Roanoke, 24018 2. Forrest Poff, Sr. 3643 Bushdale Road, Roanoke, 24014 3. William Collins 902 Fenwick Dr., Roanoke 24012 4. Al Bertolacci, 2709 Tanglewood Dr., Roanoke 24018 Chairman Johnson reminded the audience to attend the) (community meeting concerning drainage which have been scheduled throughout October and November. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 9:00 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared the meeting) adjourned. i. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman .- . A-111787-8.a ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request that Larry Logan be designated as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'/~S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Larry Logan has been designated by Roanoke County as the Hazardous Material Coordinator. George Nester, Town Manager of the Town of Vinton, has requested that he be authorized to serve in the same capacity for the Town of Vinton. This has been reviewed by County staff and they concur with the request. The Town of Vinton has agreed to provide any support assistance that might be required including the availability of Vinton Public Works equipment and manpower. Roanoke County is presently responsible for responding to any hazardous materials incidents inside the Town of Vinton. This action would officially designate Mr. Logan as Coordinator in such an event. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Larry Logan be designated as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton. SUBMITTED BY: Tommyy Fuq~ Fire & Rescue Chief Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Rnh T._ ,7ohnson/Harry C. TTi~kPnS to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle ~ Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Tommy Fuqua Larry Logan /% l l ._.. `/ R Imo./ GEORGE W. NESTER Town Manager EOANOI[E VAlIE1 TOWN O F V I N T O N ALL- AMEtICAN 197E-79 I P.O. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 (703) 983-0607 October 29, 1987 Mr. Tommy Fuqua, Fire Chief County of Roanoke 3568 Peters Creek Rd., NW Roanoke, VA 24019 Re: Virginia Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Program, 1987 General Assembly, Hazardous Material Coordinator X44-146.38 Dear Tommy: This letter is written to request that Roanoke County designate and authorize Mr. Larry A. Logan to act as Hazardous Materials Coordinator (HMC) for the Town of Vinton. I understand that Larry handles this responsiblity for Roanoke County, and I would greatly appreciate our ability to rely on the Roanoke County Emergency Response Program to help Vinton respond to any hazardous material incidents that we might encounter within the Town Limits. Thank you for your favorable response to agrees to provide any support assistance supporting a hazardous material response availability of Vinton Public Works equi incident within the Company 2 - Rescue 2 Roanoke County site where we might be of GWN/cr this request. The Town of Vinton that might be required to assist in capability. This would include the pment and manpower to respond to any response area, or at any other assistance. Sincerely, George Nester Town Manager cc: Mr. Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mr. Larry Logan Mr. Barry Fuqua, Chief Company 2 Mr. Chris Stull, Captain Rescue 2 Chief Rick Foutz, Vinton Police Dept. Ms. Sharon Argabright, Vinton EMS Coordinator Mr. Randy Austin, Assistant Town Manager Mr. Cecil Stacy, Director of Public Works A-111787-8.b ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water facilities serving an Office Building. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer Barry Ward, has requested that Roanoke County accept the water line serving an office building on Centurion Road. The water line is installed as shown on engineering plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled, Office Building Dated September 19, 1986, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water construction is $1,418.00. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water line serving an office building. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ P fillip Henry, E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~G~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 .~ ~- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle x Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry Cliff Craig John Hubbard «r - ... ~ ~ % ~ ~ r ~, nLMME H d ~v r 1 / ~ \ 41 t _ MOOIXA'OS t `~. / .~, I - -'~'~ 'w~yy~ioYo ~ .'LANDS ~ ._ - s~; ,~N y~ r 'Cxir42~ ~\ t ~O rr ~ [nt • .... 1',(~j//jl'~LIIDV` pvYC ` I LAK ~~ll ~ £` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q~ ES "~ "'4 ~' , ~- Q ~ J fit' l z ~ . ~ ' ' ; \~ ~ ~ ~, ~~.^~ ; . - ~ _ :. . . VICINITY MAP.t ,N NORTH v' / by 1 / 'e ~e ° / ti 25. 16A ~ / / 025 / / '/j^C o~ M~ ~ / , -h 1 ~1 / ~ / ~ ~' ise ~. / .1 27.1 ~~ O / / ,yy iee ~, • ~ .'~ 27 ~ / ise ~ / 7 / ~'L~ , 28. J~ ~,1 / 19A ,L1 Jl~ / 5.OOAc / 0 28 }ti ' y~~ / .ti ~' 13 / 1O 29 4r be / FZ' ~ d. ~ 0~ p I Z ~ 0~ / ?~~ JJ . / e /~C' J / iJ 05 I1 ~ / yy ' / s l0 b ~ / • ~O / ~ ~ i7py ` Ol - 'l ~ `O 32 ~~ ~~ / 2 / BJ Z 62 ~O ~ ' 3 ~ r / / 2.12 Ac ?o2a ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, '' 5 1.62 Ac 3 _..tn.ls .~ ~~ / DEPARTMENT OF OFFICE BUILDING PUE3LIC FACILITIES WATER ACCEPTANCE 3 ~~ c ~ ITEM NUMBER ~-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Rural Addition COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY_OF INFORMATION: On June 23, 1987, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a Rural Addition Priority List for 1987-88. Included in the priority list was a connecting road from Route 1890 to Route 1905 in the Hollins Community Project Area. Sue Palmer has obtained all of the necessary easements and right-of-ways. Since this road will be the primary detour road during reconstruction of Route 648, staff has prepared a Resolution requesting VDOT to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 to Route 1905 into the Secondary Highway System as a Rural Addition. FISCAL IMPACT: This project will be funded from VDOT Rural Addition Funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Resolution. SUBMITTED BY: ~,i / / ~~ ~ Phillip T. Henr p. E. Director of Eng neering APPROVED: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs 2 S- ~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CONNECTING ROAD FROM ROUTE 1890 TO ROUTE 1905 INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of the connecting road from Route 1890 to Route 1905 be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-72.1 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain deeds which deeds are recorded in the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and that by reason of the recordation of said deeds, no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3 .r ~, 3. That said road known as the connecting road from Route 1890 to Route 1905 and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 ~- . • zzo D~s~. ~ ~ ~ ~` ~j~ ~ i I~ `8,.. FiO~lj~~ ~ le~l ~sz ~ u~ru+[o o ~ r9~„ 19~, t I j ~~ O 191• ~ ~ ° J °'° ° / OW ~ ° ~ ~ ~ s 19W~ r.011~n, \ °oJ° IIS 19 i ..e 11 1 , of ~ 956 { 9.1 , Ivor ~ ~" o • °~ ° X16». I ° B~ of ~; • ° \~ ~ VICINITY MAP NORTH DEPARTMENT OF Connecting Road between State Route 1905 and Z PUBLIC FACILITIES State Route 1890 ROANOKE ERVIS~R5 NI 2~~I~N AgD OF COUNTY B RM 1~ , 19 g1 fqE B ROp,NOKE NOVEM E SD Y i ,~~5,~ Z~ ox TvE A CCEpTAN 05 Z TO Y CO G~~S~'g ~S ~ ~~ gEQUES pI TO RO TION SE NDAR ~~~ ~~ 4ZgG 111 D FgOM gOU ~E TgANSpORTA Y' CO4~2 ' RO DEPARTMENT g~~~STNM s ° f Roanoke C~ of Supexvis°x Boax a n the D by the heard uPo ZT RESOLVE foil°ws• his aaY t° be the C°nneCtinq vixginia ~ as matter wine t licati°n °f made a pant °f ..Y ~ at this ~ the aPp tea and ~2 .1 °f 1 ' Th exein ~ and uP° to 1905 be acceP Section 33 ,1- s h g°u unae pxoCeeainq .Route 1a90 to torte Highways e easements xoaa from stein of S th t axainaq been the S econaaxY Sate C°ae • the Boa x a a a i a x o a a h a v e cox aea is St xs to fox s s xe xe the Virgin it appea o f_waY h deed a t of that ~ fight- as whit t 0°ux 2 • tY ~5p1 f °ot a Cextain aee of the CixCUi xec°xaation and a fif by virtue of exk~s Office xeas°n of the Consent ox is dedicated as of the Cl and that by ewers' n°~ Hers ec°x is ~ f V i °w in the x °untY ~ Virgin from a Board ° ttinq property-of_waY f°~ goanoke Ceeas, n° rep°xt from the abu es saga right of Salad °f right °f _waYexebY quaxante from R°ui donation The Boaxa h ecting x°ad sleet necessary • nown as the c°nn on a Certain hex drainage • at said road k iCh is sh°wn a the Same is e St Th 05 and wh be. an xt of th 3• 0 to goute 19 is Res°lution ~o become a pa I °nlY fxo'~ 1g9 ing th road t ~ountY acC°mpanY d as a public ways in Roan°ke establishe m of gigh Sec°°daxy SYste after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File Sue Palmer, Department of Development Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Fred Altizer, Va. Dept. of Transportation A-111787-8.d ITEM NUMBER ~.h AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of easement, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: F & W Community Development Corporation has agreed to grant a sanitary sewer easement which crosses Lots 1 and 2, Applewood the Orchards. The easement will allow sanitary sewer service to be provided to Lot 25, Block 1, Section 2, Applewood, The Orchards which has a failing septic system. Ordinance 6987-9 authorizes the County Administrator to accept the donation or dedication of Utility Easements upon concurrence of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the easement will have no fiscal impact. RECOMMENDATION: The easement has been reviewed and the County Engineer recommends that the easement be accepted by the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Phillip Henry, E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs Denied ( ) C. Nickens Brittle x Received ( ) Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens- x cc: File Phillip Henry John Peters ~~ ~ 2/ eo . / c~OE,~ . . -S ~ . EE M~INTRIDGE ~ ! ~.. , ~~ ` . ~ a ~ • N ~ ~~.. NORTH 14 v w /a ~cP 0 ~o /6 ~ ~ '~ 16s~ 0 ~ /3 oti 13 uQc O /5 ~~ ~ ~f ~ ~ `,~.•~ ° ~ ~S~ ~~ R~^~ ~~. S~ l2 ~~'sr ~ 5 °° ~~ ,~° . ~~ 12 ~ - 4 °_ 0 ` O ` \`O `~j S ~~ ay ~ 2 e ~~~' 26 F ~°~ ~ : ~~ DSO 2 42 ~ ~ 6°z~ p0 3 Op EA M~N~ 6 ''~ ,~6~0• - ~ \ so .~ 25 41 ~ 0`' OC r 2663 ~ ~ O ° o ,O~ l ~ p 5 ~~- 4 .~`' 40 ~ - N _ o~ F ~ ~°~ 23 00 ~ ` r'/ '~3 30 2~~ /4 31 l5 32 /6 ~ -_ ~ 33 ° • `pro ,3j`s2 3 ~ \00 X99 I 4 /7 R°~ 24.18 F ~~6 .~~~ Zz 38 ,~ ,~ 34 ~~• • 0~. • . a3 .a 23 ~'9G ~ /8 - • ~ - . ~,, 35 .s ~7 ~ ~~ QZ DEPARTMENT of EASEMENT, LOTS 1 AND 2, SECTION 3,~ PUBLIC FACILITIES --- ~ - APPLEWOOD, THE ORCHARDS t ,r A-111787-8.e ITEM NUMBER " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• Supervisor McGraw has nominated Molly Eller to serve one-year term as a youth member from Glenvar High School. Her term will expire November 13, 1988. Mental Health Services Roanoke Valley Board of Directors: Chairman Johnson has concurred with the Mental Health Association's recommendation of the appointment of Dr. Henry J. Sullivan to a three-year term. His term will expire December 31, 1990. Recreation Commission Supervisor Nickens has nominated Roger L. Falls to fill the unexpired term of Ed Reynolds representing the Vinton Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1988. e~ ~"" SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Alen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens Brittle X Received ( ) Referred To Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens _~ cc: File Committee Files ~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE CNOVEMBERM17IS1987ION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Request from Roanoke City for a resolution authorizing early retiremeWhichthas beenn assumed sbyf theeCitynof of Roanoke, Roanoke pursuant to orders of annexation. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S ^CO,M/MENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: pursuant to the orders of annexation the City of Roanoke was required to assume certain portions of the public debt of Roanoke County in return for the property gained through the annexation proceedings. thesCountynin~ac~ordancecwpth oua debtrrepayment been paid to cycle. The City of Roanoke has proposed that the County accept the normal payments for principal and interest fine n t eo f9 $ 6 0 85 2 8 S5 81 year and an accelerated lump sum Pa for fiscal years 1988 representing the prinicpal payment only, through 1995. By paying this amount to the County in a lump sum fashion, the investment income potential accrues to the County and should be at a significantly greater rate than the 3.0 to 4.35$ interest rates (interest expense) required on for outstanding debt service. Considering the nuisance factor, the accountability of such small amounts in future years, it is deemed to be in the best interest of both city and county to participate in said agreement. A precedent for this consideration was established in the resultant annexation with the City of Salem. FISCAL IMPACT: The $60,528.58 principal amount would be recognized as being received during the current fiscal year from the City of Roanoke and would be applied to the debt service fund for debt retirement. ~ ~ ~~ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors agree to the accelerated payment and adopt attached agreement authorizing the early settlement as proposed by the City of Roanoke. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: '~ ..l-~ _ ~~~ ~~ >>> ~~ ~ ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hod e Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ------------------------------------ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw __ Nickens cc: Diane Hyatt Paul Mahoney ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EARLY RETIRE- MENT OF INDEBTEDNESS OF THE COUNTY ASSUMED BY THE CITY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, pursuant to Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948, September 14, 1964, and May 10, 1975, effective January 1, 1949, January 1, 1965, and January 1, 1976, respec- tively, the City of Roanoke (hereinafter the "City") assumed cer- tain public debt of Roanoke County (hereinafter the "County"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Orders, the City is required to pay to the County a total of $109,180.13, representing princi- pal ($105,304.54) and interest ($3,875.59), for Fiscal Year 1987- 88, and a total of $60,528.58 in principal payments for Fiscal Years 1988-89 through 1994-95; and WHEREAS, the City and County are in agreement that early payment of the amounts due to the County from the City would be in the best interests of each party. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the. County agrees to accept payment of $109,677.60 on or before November 24, 1987, and payment of $59,777.40 on or before December 8, 1987, in full and complete satisfaction of the City's indebtedness to the County arising out of provisions of Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948; September 14, 1964; and May 10, 1975, requiring the City to assume certain public debt of the County, in particular Section ~.._ ~"J' «. v 5.'A., Public Debt, of the Order of Annexation in Ivan R. Young, et al. v. City of Salem, Case No. 152-1965, May 10, 1975. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION 111787-8.f AUTHORIZING THE EARLY RETIREMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS OF THE COUNTY ASSUMED BY THE CITY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, pursuant to Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948, September 14, 1964, and May 10, 1975, effective January 1, 1949, January 1, 1965, and January 1, 1976, respec- tively, the City of Roanoke (hereinafter the "City") assumed cer- tain public debt of Roanoke County (hereinafter the "County"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Orders, the City is required to pay to the County a total of $109,180.13, representing princi- pal ($105,304.54) and interest ($3,875.59), for Fiscal Year 1987- 88, and a total of $60,528.58 in principal payments for Fiscal Years 1988-89 through 1994-95; and WHEREAS, the City and County are in agreement that early payment of the amounts due to the County from the City would be in the best interests of each party. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County agrees to accept payment of $109,677.60 on or before November 24, 1987, and payment of $59,777.40 on or before December 8, 1987, in full and complete satisfaction of the City's indebtedness to the County arising out of provisions of Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948; September 14, 1964; and May 10, 1975, requiring the City to assume certain public debt of the County, in particular Section 5.A ., Public Debt, of the Order of Annexation in Ivan R. Young, et al, v. City of Salem, Case No. 152-1965, May 10, 1975. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance City of Roanoke A-111787-8. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUB_ Settlement of Board of Supervisors v Aetna Casualty And Surety Co Disbursal of settlement proceeds to homeowners COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: For nearly a year the County has been involved in the above- referenced litigation. The matter in dispute is the allegedly faulty construction of a deck by Decks by Dane, Inc. around a swimming pool at the home of Ross and Karen Garland at 3751 Verona Trail. The Garlands notified County Building Official Skip Nininger, who inspected the deck and determined that Decks by Dane had violated the County building code in constructing the deck. The specific problem was that the deck had separated from the pool and appeared to be sinking. Decks by Dane disputed Mr. Nininger's conclusion, however, and stated that the problems with the deck were the fault of the company which installed the swim- ming pool. Because Decks by Dane refused to correct the problems with the deck, the County Attorney notified their insurer, the Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., that the County expected Aetna to pay over the $5,000 bond which Decks by Dane had obtained to guar- antee that its work would conform to the building code. Aetna refused to honor the bond on the grounds that Decks by Dane was not at fault. The County then instituted this lawsuit to enforce the bond. After nearly a year of litigation Aetna has proposed the sum of $3,000 to settle. The County Attorney's Office recommends that this offer be accepted. The pursuit of this claim has now consumed at least seventy (70) hours of attorney time in addition to secretarial support and other overhead costs. A trial on the issues would require expert testimony and would not take place before the spring of 1988. A second issue requiring the Board's approval is the disposi- tion of the settlement proceeds. By state law, the purpose of the contractor's bond is to provide a source of funds to home- owners who are the victims of faulty construction. The Garlands are, therefore, the primary parties in interest on this bond al- though the County is named beneficiary. In order to fulfill the legislative intent concerning contractors' bonds, Attorney's office recommends that the proceeds be Ross and Karen Garland. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: ~- ~~ the County disbursed to The County Attorney recommends acceptance of the $3,000 settlement offer and disbursal of the proceeds to Ross and Karen Garland. Respectfully submitted, ~~~,~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------- A roved y• ACTION VOTE PP (X) Motion b Bob L. Johnson/Harry Denied ( ) C. Nickens No Yes Abs Received ( ) Brittle x Referred Garrett ~ To Johnson ~- McGraw ~- Nickens x cc: File Paul Mahoney AMENDED 7/21/88 A-111787-8.h ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements, and road right-of-way ~___•.._-`'--being dedicated to the County of Roanoke-- Southwest Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~.,.. r SUMMARY OF INFORi~iATION: ,. To complete the Southwest industrial Park development, Dunmar Enterprises, Commonwealth Tooi Specialty, •Inc., the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, and Green and Associates are dedicating various sanitary sewer, public utility easement, and road right-of-way ~ ~~`- to the County of Roanoke. These dedications are required in order for Commonwealth Drive to be C included in the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation highway system, to allow the County to maintain the sanitary sewer system, and to dedicate the public utility easement for public use. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 102787-4 adopted on October 27, 1987, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations or dedications of noncontroversial real estate matters. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this acceptance by resolution under the consent agenda. ~•`'~'~°~ Respectfully submitted, ~~ Vl ~ rV` Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~9 ----------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by• Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens Brittle x Received ( ) Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry Cliff Craig Brent Sheffler t a ~"~~• = . A-111787-8.h ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements, and road right-of-way easements being dedicated to the County of Roanoke-- Southwest Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: fc~~.. ~.,~/ ate.,.. C SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: To complete the Southwest Industrial Park development, Dunmar Enterprises, Commonwealth Tool Specialty, Inc., the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, and Green and Associates are dedicating various sanitary sewer, public utility easement, and road right-of-way easements to the County of Roanoke. These dedications are required in order for Commonwealth Drive to be included in the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation highway system, to allow the County to maintain the sanitary sewer system, and to dedicate the public utility easement for public use. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 102787-4 adopted on October 27, 1987, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations or dedications of noncontroversial real estate matters. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this acceptance by resolution under the consent agenda. Respectfully submitted, T Yl ~ Yv~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~ ~ ,. ~ w ~ I ,~ ~//J~ Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Abs Nickens Brittle x Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x cc : Fi]_e Phillip Henry Cliff Craig Brent Sheffler ITEM NUMBER ~ `"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - October 1987 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 10/02/87 10/16/87 10/30/87 $358,420.52 358,183.15 401,059.20 $2,472,550.76 1,117,662.87 3.590.213.63 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: e~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER ~ ! '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of October 1987. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Dominion Concentration Sovran Bank Savings Southwest Virginia S & L Signet Bank - CP Sovran Bank - CP Craigie Inc. - CP 3,696,153.22 932.87 100,000.00 1,965,250.00 988,116.67 1,478,372.23 SUBMITTED BY: ~~--~ _ ~~ ~ ~ /~~ fired C. Anderson County Treasurer APPROVED BY: .^~ Elmer C. od County Administrator - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Garret Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER ~ -° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Status report on the extension of Valley Metro services along Brambleton Avenue. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has concluded negotiations with Valley Metro for the extension of services into Roanoke County along Brambleton Avenue. The route extends along Brambleton Avenue to Garst Mill Rd., where it turns north and then into the Cave Spring Corners Shopping Center. Stops inside the shopping center include the Kroger area and the Hills Department Store area. The bus then proceeds up the rear exit of the shopping center, turns right on Electric Road, and subsequently into the Cave Spring Office Park, where its further most point is a stop adjacent to the Roanoke Orthopedic Center. On the return, the bus comes out of Postal Drive, left onto Electric Road (Rt. 419), left on Brambleton Avenue and back into the city. This route is repeated eleven times daily, Monday through Friday. A contract is being developed by Valley Metro for the trial period, which will end June 30, 1988 with the County's share of the anticipated deficit not to exceed $400 per month. After reviewing this proposal with the Valley Metro Board during November, 1987, their marketing staff will assist the Brambleton Avenue Merchants in promoting this extension of service. At the present time, ridership data is not available, however, staff will work with Valley Metro personnel in attempting to keep the Board of Supervisors and the Brambleton Avenue Merchants apprised of the success of this route extension. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the trial period be continued through June 30, 1988, monitored monthly, and that staff assist the Brambleton Avenue merchants and the marketing area of Valley Metro's staff in its attempt to promote this extension of the service area. L--- SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ohn M. Chamblis Jr. Assistant County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~~ ~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs ~- i I'~EM N~BER R ANOKE gORS OF CENTER SUPERNI TRATlOtJ ARD O ~~ ~DN1I 0~ TK ANOKE C T ESDpY I ~E~TSAT Oar RvA. , ON G~1'A A ~~ ~1 ROAN gE INZ Z on AT A VZRG 1987 _ w°rk Sessi ~~ CO~~~Y ~ e~b~ive Program ~ ./~"" ~p,TE' S COMMENTS' ~ / ~ SET 19 8 1 <~°~~/" ,./.L~''~"~`~` ~~ • ~ e i~~ vB~ECT ~ -~ ~ is legis r91nia 5/p,~~~ ~:~~~ .der i he V i ad- NTY ~ s i t Cp~3 ' ORMATION' should ° s ssi°n ° rd c°nsid h the ! lNF er~isors the 19$$ at the B act thr ou9~ayue rd ~f Supons f°r ested th ide imp unicipal ts, and .le B° a suggest t is sug of statewvirginia Mamendmenthrough r als AS e nb f ican fs C° nt ugh 9e to Roa °ke C°untY LeSSn~ia AS asiof in uessofthnterest e responses tO the V it g. ~ issu i e iss formulat specif i un qu and uch as ~ ocal C aster amendments •rd should ~ through VAC° ~ s Commission °n L e Boa . Issue the ficant Statewide °mmendation °f ernments to signs a) The nment Structures; enable leaaproble o~eme ts.~ ~ over i to r at it imp G ternat ~estion el °ff-s fun in9) , b) COT- essa tr an op° ae~el Set airport d C a mpactort tion distr is utional °f f icers' la transp constit the f°rmu needs of r ocag ides for ed. lc) gundin9 tion cOnc 1 JLARC r t 9 State funds to e spot (d) dis nr ibu s and for aWl amendment 0 tioard sh°u~dthr° gh general e (21 The Bof teres w ref us ~, in sues to all° in9~ specif is is Section u6 Pp d witUef and red as ~ Amend be eq o r b 1 a) s t° lue ~ alternatil ghts. emergency m-~ (b) Amend Section 42.1-70 to allow an increase in the law library fee from $2.00 to $3.00. (3) The Board should consider amending the Charter (a pub- lic hearing following a 10 day notice publication is required before the County may submit a request to the General Assembly for a charter amendment) to address specific, unique issues of interest to Roanoke County, such as: (a) Amend Section 2.02 "Taxing Powers" to provide authority for the Board to levy a tax on meals and tobacco. (b) Amend Chapter 8 to create a new Section 8.03 to authorize the creation of the office of license inspections, which would authorize the enforcement of the County license ordinance through the issuance of tickets or summons by officials in the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue. (c) Amend Section 9.03 to authorize the appointment of members of the Board of Zoning Appeals by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. RECOMMENDATION: The Board should adopt and approve a legislative program for the 1988 session of the General Assembly. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION VOTE Motion by: No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens A-111787-9 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Organization of Fire Company in Back Creek COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~y~~~ U SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: D_-1 ROANOKE CENTER The County Comprehensive Plan identified the need for a fire station in the Back Creek community. The 1985 bond referendum included funding in the amount of $300,000 for land purchase and construction of this facility. The land for the station has been secured and a conceptual drawing of the fire station has been prepared. It is planned to start construction on the station by the spring of 1988 with completion scheduled for the summer of 1988. Equipment needs for the station have been identified, and a one-time capital cost of approximately $250,000 will be included in the FY 88-89 budget request. It is projected that this station will be fully operational by the spring of 1989. Approximately 10 months ago, staff members met with prospective volunteers in the community and discussed the requirements of organizing a volunteer fire company. Since that time the recruitment of members and development of a constitution and by-laws, along with the election of officers, has been completed. Although this is a new company, the membership consists of seven members that are currently members of volunteer fire companies in Roanoke County. These experienced personnel provide a nucleus of highly trained and experienced fire-fighters. The person elected chief, Mr. Lynn Thomas, has been a member of a County volunteer department for nine years. He has served in several officer positions attaining the rank of assistant chief in the organization. Mr. Thomas also is a certified fire service instructor that will enable him to train members of the department. New personnel orientation training began November 10, 1987 to be f ollowed by the required Firefighter I certification program. Conceivably all personnel would be certified to Firefighter III prior to beginning operation. Personnel will be given practical experience by being assigned for duty at other County fire stations until Company 11 becomes operational. ~~ ~ -°-/ "The 'staff has reviewed the constitution and by-laws along with the official membership roster of the company and find that this company is organized as a combination fire and rescue department with the rescue segment being added at a future date. Also, the requirements of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia have been met with exception of official recognition by the governing body. Chief Thomas along with other members of Company 11 will be in attendance at the Board meeting to answer any further questions that may arise. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board recognize the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department Company No. 11 - Back Creek as an official unit of the Fire and Rescue Department. FISCAL IMPACT• The cost of protective clothing and physical examinations for all members can be funded within the current FY budget. Additional funding requirements will be addressed in the FY 88-89 budget request. SUBMITTED BY: ~. n ,~ ~-t~~ T. C. Fuq} a ~ Chie ACTION Approved (~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To APPROVED: Elmer C. Hod e, Jr. County Administrator Motion by: Lee Garrett/ Alan H. Brittle VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle x Garrett x Johnson x __ McGraw x __ Nickens x cc: File Tommy Fuqua r `• ITEM NUMBER ~ °-' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Donation of a small plot of real estate on Route 311 in Catawba from the County School Board of Roanoke County to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Tax Map No. 7.00-1-73.1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At a meeting of the County School Board of Roanoke County held October 14, 1976, the School Board approved the donation of a small plot of School Board property adjoining the Catawba Bap- tist Church to said Church. Legal proceedings never transpired to accomplish the transfer of the deed from the School Board to the Church. Catawba Baptist Church has dissolved its membership and is currently nonexistent; thus negating the School Board's action on October 15, 1976. On October 8, 1987, in accordance with Section 22.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, the County School Board of Roanoke County declared the small plot of real estate located on Route 311 in Catawba, Tax Map No. 7.00-1- 73.1 to be surplus property. Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County requires that the acceptance of real property be accomplished by ordinance. The first reading of this proposed ordinance will be held on November 17, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for December 1, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendations: 1. That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. r ~- 2. That the net proceeds from any future sale of this sur- plus property be allocated to the capital improvements fund as a reserve for capital improvements. Respectfully submitted, `~1~` `~'`~ ~'V'vt. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens 9 ~ ~~ f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ` COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION OF A SMALL PLOT OF REAL ESTATE ON ROUTE 311 FROM THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia, the County School Board of Roanoke County has declared the subject property to be surplus on October 8, 1987; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acceptance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on November 17, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on Decmeber 1, 1987. This real estate is located on Route 311 and is more particularly described as Tax Map No. 7.00-1-73.1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the donation of a small plot of real estate located on Route 311 in Catawba, Tax Map No. 7.00-1-73.1, from the County School Board of Roanoke County to the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acceptance of this pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That all proceeds from any future sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. .,,...,Y..•riw,tbta~~:v-~:.I'•Pir'.,~r~}A :~ Td~wot t.~'•~1f!''+'f. . •~ -i, •-~7, 4'~,v`t't'~'"~: .~,.a- .. •~ i ~ ...., . ~~r. ~ . ~ ,"1 ,q p` L ~. ~, ~_W „-. ..~ sr~ Its r'i•. ~77T ~ .t.• _ t _ f ifT '~~~,f~~'~~ ~(~!'~Y~~F{~ 1' 'M • 'j ~~ ~F~{3,~7 xy e~`~~ jti~Tl~tl ~;; ,~ ~ ~' J j~ ~ -.at~. ~/~•4 •rf~ - r ":.~.~, r ~i. ~ !,~ ems. F. ~ N ~Sh ~, ' ~~L:~ ~ ••~ ~ 1,•:T• ; s'YRS~T. '~+S ,1~ ~ 1 k~~ . r ~w t ' tirr+ , Y~ "' •?: - ~ ~ i- .~+ •~ r r- t .•:~ ' \. lF :'i ~ P+Yt•;. 1; "s.aY~y r/~ :' 1 4.. :. J _ •r. -d, .a. -1~ s *. ..'"~~A .fi viii ': t; ~~ ~.1 ~ - R4•.~• r~.~Qr • ~t.~y} Sa<7L' `~ ~~~rl'1 ,; f~.,4~,•N,''~F~D/'t ° ~. i t• .t?. t ~. 4;~~~`~":-.~v ~t+•• ~ fi_~•y i •.~ r :t. ~ ~• ... ~`(i'~~/~~ ~('~•:.~` ~ ~ •*~~4`.ry t ry.r t/ 7.1r 1 " ~ hk.w q ~.r', '{ ' a _, r ~ ~ .~fe> 'w' _ • 1~ •'# f f~''r~~VMGW/ ~ v'~'rtP'Sl 1~~~~~~~1~ ~;~." . ~.:~.L.. ~~~~ ~,.'~'~!d~-~ 4s ' ,-1~' ~ ~~~ri' 4' f~~d. j" t~ ~• 'li~f~jZ ; ~` 1!T.gv3~1~(• •.~, . t r.• . rte` ~ $~; ~ 21.J ~ 1.QV{; .•~ . • ~ ~ +029 ~ ~ ~r ' ••r ~;~. ~ J r ' 2 BOAC. :• ~ ,,"~'" ~~~rY ,.,, ~. _ Pik "~., , ,j~. ~• ~' iD ~ ~~ . C. s. ,{~ A~, ' ~ i ,, • ~ ~~ •,.a. ~ •~ 'ems ]p~ ~ ~{•~,(,~. ~ j~ , ~•+~ 2f C~~ h ~j 1~ c;». . f~,~h1~~~r{' ~SyR v~~~s,~ ~ ~:~~. ~ Yy 5e' ~' • l~ '•~'.'~~ ~.~~SJA~+=~ ab ,CZ~VY! ~ ~;d•~ '2 ~ •'T•L ~ ~ i ~ t~ty~~ffi ,~t~~-~.~t~~a%'' • ~~•a ~F ~. ,.r+~~,.,'~~~ -. a~.yy°~,.: .a`.tSn~!.'. a~0,. "oaA,. AC.• ~2~Q7~ ~ ` '~~; ; ~a>K~[r' .~,{~ ~~ G~ j 'r~ ~ ~~` ~,y,f~. ~~~ ~t~j,~ ~ '-.~ ~`.'. ~~ `~4,` ~ *~ '- ~ i Y•0,,,) t _ y ~ 3y~-i.lt'~~ i. ',,`r~ p. Sf.. r::•"• ~~ ~'u• •'•~ r ~. OO . ~` 1 .!{"3~ "_ _ __ __ _. __. N 1* L~--t'J~~fy~YL=~~t4f~;t`r t .~~yu i~'{.-•~ ~~ / ~- _ ~~*M~ 1~ 8Q }:#2 Arc .802 ,., . `. t4 Ac:(D) ~:' .~~cso '~` '.~ ,, _K.,,. r _t. r ~ r rl~: 3~ O T°. i 1. `~. { 8Q3~-~ ' ~ ~ X• - . _ L •~ • •yy~ d (il ~(~ 1r7e1~1 d .~ Y~%a~~ i ~ '.. h~-f.V~~l-+v\iIl k '}i a` .r ~ a u + t •,V 6 4 f ` ,, _ ~. _ }~~jy W ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' .. y , .i... .• i 'f'..' ~ i l' 1 ITEM NUMBER ~"~G AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Sale of surplus real estate 37.863 acres located off of Roanoke Boulevard and Hem- lock Road, City of Salem, Tax Map No. 194-1-1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At a meeting of the County School Board of Roanoke County held on January 10, 1980, the School Board approved the transfer of 37.863 acres of real estate located off of Roanoke Boulevard and Hemlock Road, behind the U.S. Army Reserve Center and Camelot Nursing Home in the City of Salem, Virginia, Tax Map No. 194-1-1, to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2495, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County accepted the conveyance of the subject parcel from the School Board. The County has received an offer to purchase the entire 37.863 acre tract. Staff believes that it is in the best interest of Roanoke County to dispose of the property. Section 18.04 of the County charter requires that any sale of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The first read- ing of this proposed ordinance will be held on November 17, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for December 1, 1987. The Board's policy for the sale of real estate provides that any person may submit an offer in writing for the purchase of property. Any written offer should be received by the County on or before November 30, 1987. FTSCAT. TMPACT: Sales price to be determined from the best offer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendation: 1. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that this parcel of land is surplus and available for sale by the County. ~- .~ 2. That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. 3. That the net proceeds from the sale of this property be allocated to the Capital Improvements Fund as a reserve for capi- tal improvements. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion b No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Y• Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~__. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE, 37.863 ACRES LOCATED OFF OF ROANOKE BOULEVARD AND HEMLOCK ROAD, CITY OF SALEM, TAX MAP N0. 194-1-1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on November 17, 1987. The second reading was held on December 1, 1987; and WHEREAS, this real estate consists of an 37.863 acre tract of land located off of Roanoke Boulevard and Hemlock Road behind the U.S. Army Reserve Center and Camelot Nursing Home in the City of Salem, Tax Map No. 194-1-1; and WHEREAS, an offer has been received for this property from in the amount of , and said offer is hereby accepted; all other offers are hereby rejected; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the offer of in the amount of to purchase 37.863 acres located off of Roanoke Boulevard and Hemlock Road, in the City of Salem, Tax Map No. 194-1-1 be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney; and 3. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. ITEM NUMBER -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Second Reading of Petition Vacating the remaining Plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~ a~~Gr~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of this item was October 27, 1987. This proposed ordinance is to vacate the remaining Plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision (except a 10 foot strip dedicated for public utilities which is located along the eastern boundary) upon the petition of Lingerfelt Development Corporation, Colonial American National Bank, Trustee of the Estate of Marshall L. Harris, deceased, Elizabeth F. Harris and Truck Enterprises, Inc.. The Petitioners now desire that the remaining portion of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision be permanently vacated in order that the Petitioners might use the same for improvement and enhancement of their property. Section 15.1-482 of the State Code requires that a subdivision Plat may be vacated after any lot in this subdivision has been sold either by a written instrument agreeing to the vacation signed by all of the lot owners or by an ordinance, adopted by the Board. The applicants are requesting that the Board, adopt an ordinance vacating remaining subdivision Plat. IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the Planning Commission that the Final Order be approved by the Board of Supervisors upon this second ~-l reading. SUBMITTED BY: 1 APPROVED: Arnold Covey' - ~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Development Review Director County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) M tion b No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To o y. Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~" I t.' t . R. ya/Vl'OCiY '~. ~ i PROPQNT ~~ ~s,.• v ~ ~ ( M. L. HARD/.f' oROPE.~TY =~`.~ -,.._.. o~~ 6 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Bd iy --t:dr ~KSf! O¢E -- ~ ~~ ~ ?o ~ a I + ~ wo' zs8 ~ ~` ~ ~0 ~ a ~ c l0 ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~~ k Z~ a v ° ~ ~ Ns~ o a~~. y -- .ass' zo'~ ~ ~E ~a ~ ,.0 ~~ I p.~ ~ 225.0 a ns.o4 ~~' ,~ ~ sis o ~~ ~ ~ .,. . ~ RRVO.v w ~ y N L.4~t/E ~ ft~ ~ ~• ~~ a °• ~. ~ a .,*~~Qr. ~ trs. o ^ ~ a ~p~o ~ Ig ~j~ ~~~ q b = ' ~ ~ ~ . ros ~ r I~ ?EO. p `~- ~ ~ ~NI ~ ~s~.• a w • ~ `~ :as.e i ~ n• ~ o ~S a I~~ ~ N ~ h - q a o~ a I~$, O 3 v a I~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~`& S I ~ n (~ ~ a~ ~'$ z4o.o _sv_.o ~usd I ~ ~ 4i 4 ~' ~~ C,~ P"' coy •o h~ I ~ ~ 8 `~ ~ ~.~• L _ ~ svaa ~u~s~~ I ~ ~ use (,'~, . ~ A ~o,'o :oo. o o ~ ~ C,~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~I~ ~ a ~ h ~ ~. A ~ :oo.o I X6.0 ~ ~ ~ a•. ~ ~r ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ i i~~ ~ ~' q. ,~; Ion ~, ~ ~0 ~ I o~ L' h~ a~ : b ~, I ~~ :oo. o ~ ~ use I ~ ~~~' ~ ~ ~ o i ~' ~„~3 ~~~ ~ Q• ~~ ~ ~.k~ ~ - } '~ ~~ ~ Faso ~ ~uso _ ti ` ~ •~ as•'~o• a• 1 ~~~1 ~ ~ f.SS2o~ w I !J~~~ ~ ~~, w ~ ~ ,• E~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m "' ~ ~ ~ i 3 '~ H • .'' ~o +l ,~ ~ •~- To t/.S.Rf~ iJ."46o 4 -~ss4t4i'w 2zs.o~•a+rne,ta I~ ~~?- .wrf r •.s ,.~J~r ., ,. vr_~.~,~. ~ v RD!/7E N° !/7' . ~, i ~I , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION ~ / CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 / ORDINANCE VACATING THE REMAINING PLAT OF SECTION ONE, THORNCREST SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Lingerfelt Development Corporation; Colonial American National Bank, Trustee of the estate of Marshall L. Harris, deceased; Elizabeth F. Harris; and Truck Enterprises, Inc. have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the petitioners are the owners and contract purchaser of a certain tract of land located in Roanoke County, being identified as Tract 5, containing 0.847 acre, a portion of which lies within the northeasterly boundary of Thorncrest Sub- division, said portion consisting of lots in Block l; and WHEREAS, the petitioners now desire that the remaining portion of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision be permanently vacated in order that the Petitioners might use the same for the improvement and enhancement of their property; and WHEREAS, a public hearing and first reading on this ordinance was held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on November 17, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision dated August 17, 1948, revised September 28, 1948, and found in Plat Book 3, page 67, among the records of the Clerk ~-/ of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, is here- by vacated, but subject to the rights of the owners of any public utility installations previously erected therein, together with the right of ingress and egress for the maintenance of such util- ity installations. 2. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court is authorized to take such action as may be necessary to accomplish the purpose and intent of this ordinance. J.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 ORDINANCE 111787-10 VACATING THE REMAINING PLAT OF SECTION ONE, THORNCREST SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Lingerfelt Development Corporation; Colonial American National Bank, Trustee of the estate of Marshall L. Harris, deceased; Elizabeth F. Harris; and Truck Enterprises, Inc. have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the petitioners are the owners and contract purchaser of a certain tract of land located in Roanoke County, being identified as Tract 5, containing 0.847 acre, a portion of which lies within the northeasterly boundary of Thorncrest Sub- division, said portion consisting of lots in Block 1; and WHEREAS, the petitioners now desire that the remaining portion of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision be permanently vacated in order that the Petitioners might use the same for the improvement and enhancement of their property; and WHEREAS, a public hearing and first reading on this ordinance was held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on November 17, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision dated August 17, 1948, revised September 28, 1948, and found in Plat Book 3, page 67, among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, is here- by vacated, but subject to the rights of the owners of any public utility installations previously erected therein, together with the right of ingress and egress for the maintenance of such util- ity installations. 2. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court is authorized to take such action as may be necessary to accomplish the purpose and intent of this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review John Willey, Real Estate Assessments Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Paul Mahoney, County Attorney A-111787-11 ITEM NUMBER '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Lease of surplus real estate Old Bent Mountain Fire Station Tax Map No. 111-1-17 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~`~'~Y""''~-nom' ~'~..t~a~0~~ ~ - .~.:~-, SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County Administrator has received an offer to lease the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station, Tax Map No. 111-1-17. This pro- perty consists of approximately .443 of an acre located on State Route 221 and has been declared surplus by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County. Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that any lease of public property be accomplished and authorized by ordinance. The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on October 27, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for November 17, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: Lease price to be determined from the best offer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendations: 1. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that this parcel of land is surplus and available for lease by the County. 2. That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. Respectfully submitted, C~~`f,v~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Q - ~., ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Steven No Yes Abs Denied ( ) A. McGraw to deny Brittle x Received ( ) Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x Approved x Second Motion: Lee Garrett/ x Bob L. Johnson motion that property x be declared surplus for sale or x lease x x cc: File Paul Mahoney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE, OLD BENT MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION, TAX MAP N0. 111-1-17 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the leasing of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on October 27, 1987. A second reading was held on November 17, 1987; and WHEREAS, this real estate consists of approximately .443 of an acre located on State Route 221, Tax Map No. 111-1-17; and WHEREAS, an offer has been received to lease this pro- perty from in the amount of and said offer is hereby accepted; all other offers are hereby rejected; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the offer of amount of in the to lease the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station, Tax Map No. 111-1-17 be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the lease of said property; all such documents to be upon form approved by the County Attorney. e ' ITEM NUMBER ~ ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Sale of surplus real estate Well lot located in Otterview Gardens Subdivision Tax Map No. 27.05-2-14 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: r.., ~~o~~~.~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 12, 1987, the County received an offer from a citizen to purchase an abandoned well lot located on Laban Road in Otterview Gardens Subdivision, Tax Map No. 27.05-2-14. Mr. Craig believes that it would be in the County's best interests to dispose of the abandoned well lot. Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that any sale of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The first read- ing of this proposed ordinance was held on October 27, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for November 17, 1987. The Board's policy for the sale of real estate provides that any person may submit an offer in writing for the purchase of property. Any written offer should be received by the County on or before November 16, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: Sales price to be determined from the best offer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendation: 1. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that this parcel of land is surplus and available for sale by the County. 2. That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. 3. That the net proceeds from the sale of this property be allocated to the Capital Improvements Fund as a reserve for capi- tal improvements. Respectfully submitted, ~~,~` Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ---------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 µ"~ `~ ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE, A WELL LOT LOCATED IN OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading was held on November 17, 1987; and WHEREAS, this real estate consists of a well lot lo- cated on Laban Road in Otterview Gardens Subdivision; and WHEREAS, an offer has been received for this property from in the amount of , and said offer is hereby accepted; all other offers are hereby rejected; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the offer of in the amount of to purchase a well lot located in Otterview Gardens Subdivision, Tax Map No. 27.05-2-14 be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney; and ~°„~i 3. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 ORDINANCE 11787-12 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS REA L ESTATE, A WELL LOT LOCATED IN OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- Glared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading was held on November 17, 1987; and WHEREAS, this real estate consists of a well lot lo- Gated on La ban Road in Otterview Gardens Subdivision; and WHEREAS, an offer has been received for this property from L. Edgar Foley in the amount of $13,500, and said offer is hereby accepted; all other offers are hereby rejected; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That the offer of L. Edgar Foley in the amount of $13,500 to purchase a well lot located in Otterview Gardens Subdivision, Tax Map No. 27.05-2-14 be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney; and 3. Tha t all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 11/19/87 cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Real Estate Assessments Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ 'I '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, SUBJECT: Plantation Enterprises, Special Exception, Golf Course COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Gx,~,~ ~? ~~ u~~~ ~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Petitioner proposes to construct and operate a nine-hole golf course on 24.77 acres of property zoned R-1, Residential, located adjacent to Plantation Road and the Old Manor Subdivision within the Hollins Magisterial District. A Special Exception is required to operate a country club and related facilities in an R-1 district. The course will be operated year-round from daylight to dusk, seven days per week. The facility will not be lighted. The course will be operated as a small country club with a member-guest format and a maximum of approximately 30 players using the facility at any one time. The property is located within a Development land use area. The policies within the Development category encourage outdoor recreation uses. The property borders existing low density residential on the north, south, and west and dense forest and floodplain on the east. A golf course of this scale should insure protection for surrounding property owners by providing for a low intensity use adjacent to existing residential development. According to the applicant, the playing portion of the course as shown by the proposed concept plan will be approximately 100 to 150 feet from the nearest house. Flying golf balls may be a problem. Petitioner's request is a low traffic generating activity. It is estimated that 171 vehicle trips a day will result. This rate is equivalent to one unit of single family housing per 1.45 acres. The current zoning, in conjunction with the availability of public sewer and water, permits up to six units of housing per acre. Three units could reasonably be anticipated. The proposed concept plan shows that the access will be through the Old Manor Subdivision. Staff strongly recommends the development of a separate means of access through the petitioner's property. Proposed course will partially be located within the 100 year floodplain. The applicant must prove by a certified plat that the clubhouse will be out of the floodway and that the first floor elevation of the clubhouse structure will be at least one foot above the 100 year flood elevation. Community sentiment is unknown. l ~_~ ,~ FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this request with conditions limiting outdoor lighting to that which is required for safety and security; a separate means of access through petitioner's property; and additional screening or buffering suitable to prevent errant golf balls from causing property damage to either adjoining residences or passing vehicles on Plantation Road. Staff is of the opinion that the satisfaction of the last condition requires additional administrative or legislative review of a more detailed concept plan prior to approval. SUBMITTED BY: ~.6 ~ Rob Stal er Director of Planning Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( > Ref erred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nckens VOTE No Yes Abs 2 (b ~ F- ~ ~,.w o ~ n -~ l'~ ~ W ~' J V N ~ cd 0 ~ o ~ ~ ~ F ~Z~w0.J I-- Y - 3 0 z O 0 ~ ~ U . ~ .J ~ ~ 0. \: ~ ~ ~ o~ y-~ ~3 0 _1~ ~8~-r ~~ .. T ~\ats ~' ' ~'_ \ ,q~ R ~, ~ , ,' ~ (l ~ ~ ~~ _~ ~~ _. ~' ~ ..~ i/ - ~-- . /i ~,~ ~- ~~;; ~o~ ~ ~, .~ ~' G ~~ ~ ~~~ D~ W 5L u e ¢do~ no~ldlNa~d i a Q Q %~~~~~ 3 `~~J p i ~~ ~ II 1\ cnrxxsiw p((~~, O v:x~n I t ~F,'_ ,wglwniN \.. II ""dT,"O~ ~1l~OVSt1~~-~ ~pra. Se vaw , ~~ I f[FMS[M. .M O F..ra ~R / /' r ~ ~rTy~~~ i~ ~In, l.Inn .~ 7 ~ .S~~W'1~~. } `( \ao ~~~.. a.. ~~.. •_ ~- ~.. ~__ 11 ~.. > M '`~ B p N_ E rp i II I ~a N J~ I // '.. 11~ \ ~ 5b VISTA AV '9 6 I fO~ \ A Ig T ~ ~ ~ ~ rI ^'~` `' ~l ~~~ ,, an~ouuwnrc mrn~~ . `:: .Y't4 a ~:~F. >4 ~ ~\ ...:: .. ... .:,q,... x...; .:. .. rer re .:y~':.' ... ...: ......: ~.1 I ~v:::io. VICINITY MAD //8 '7-/ N unDru A ~ ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ~„ Plantation Enterprises Special Exception (Golf Course) 4 s 1 A-111787-13 ITEM NUMBER ~ `~ ~ -` ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Keith and Diane Bradshaw, Special Exception, Child Care Center COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Petitioner proposes to construct and operate a day care center and a fenced outdoor play area on 1.58 acres of property zoned M-l, Light Industrial, approximately 350 feet north of the intersection of US 460 West and VA 643 directly behind the Fort Lewis Public Safety Building within the Catawba Magisterial District. A Special Exception is required to operate a day care center and related facilities in an M-1 district. The facility will be open Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. year- round. The center will be designed to accommodate 100-200 children at peak capacity. The ages of the children will range from 2~ to 12 years old. The petitioner operates another day care facility located in the Roanoke Valley. The property is located within a Principal Industrial land use area. Public sewer and water are available to the site. The policies within the Principal Industrial category discourage commercial development in industrial areas unless supportive of the area needs. The intent of the policy is to promote the creation of planned employment centers and to discourage the intrusion of incompatible land uses into Principal Industrial areas. A child care center in this location is compatible with and supportive of nearby industrial and commercial operations. The proposal conforms with the intent of the recent zoning ordinance amendment that allows for the placement of selected commercial uses within the M-1 district. Petitioner's request is a low-to-moderate traffic generating activity. Most traffic generation will occur during the morning and evening peak times. With 200 children, it is conceivable that approximately 150-200 vehicles will access the property during each of these peak times. Staff recommends that the number of entrances be reduced from two to one. VDOT states that "one-way" drives must receive further review prior to issuance of an entrance permit. Typically one-way drives are only permitted for "drive-in" facilities such as banks. ~ ~1~!°~/ m p 0 ~~ ~ ~O ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ C o ~ e ~,~~v ~ ~ ~ h Q O o O ~ ~ ~' J ~ i~ _ _~ ~ ~ C ~ _ ~~ '~_ ` _~ ~_ '~ ~~ `` ~~~ t_ ~ -~ ,~~ ~. ~~vn ~ ~~ IIO SS.Oaii9 1'100' M- - . Z c~.r.w- M Yr~wr ~b K t /M fw~ hIr ire [INS 1 B -' / / II 1 / atA~/ ~° s« w saoa ~•~ eoo' A ROANOKE COUNTY Keith and Diane Bradshaw DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Special Exception Permit (Day Care Center) ^ ^v^~^^ ^ ^ n^n^ LEGAL NOTICE OF A RDG[JLAR MEETING OF THE ROANDKE 00(Jl~fl'Y BOARD OF SUPERVI90R.S Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, in Roanoke, Virginia to hear the following requests: 1. Petition of Plantation Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a golf course on a 24.77 a re tract located at 5621 Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Keith and Diane Bradshaw for a Special Exception Permit to operate a child care center on a 1.58 acre tract located on the west side of Route 643 approximately 300 feet north of its intersection with Route 460 in the Catawba Magisterial District. All plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Department of Development, Roan 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. Given under my hand this 29th day of October, 1987. !`°~ . Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish: Evening Fdition Roanoke Times & World-News November 3, 1987 November 10, 1987 Please bill: County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ~. M E M O R A N D U M To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors From: Jon Hartley, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commissio Date: November 9, 1987 Subj: Rezoning Request of Brambleton Medical Associates Please note that the Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates has been continued. Originally scheduled and advertised for the November 15 Board of Supervisors public hearing, the petition will be reheard by the Planning Commission on December 1, 1987. L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Brambleton Medical Associates, requesting rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business, and amendment of the Roanoke County Land Use Plan: Future Land Use Map designation from Neighborhoodimmediatel1OSOUthTofn3142oBrambletoncAvenueain1the1Ca8eacres and located Y Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a medical office. The County Planning Commission will review the petition on November 5, 1987. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents relatedelo ment,rlocatedmin RoomX600nat thetRoanokecCountyhe Department of Dev p Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to aountd office ofaPersonneluServicesla[703]a772r2018)tif to contact the C Y special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 29th day of October, 1987. ~) /~' Mary H. len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: November 3, 1987 November 10, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: John T. Molumphy, III 308 Second Street S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 PETITIONER: ROGER P. JEFFII~SON ~ '~ ~ ~~ °" ' , CASE NI~IBER: 45-11/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 5, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 17, 1987 1. RD~UEST Petition of Roger P. Jefferson to rezone a 1.35 acre tract fran B-l, Business to B-2, Business and I~-1, Industrial to construct a convenience store, additional office space, and a storage facility, located at the southwest intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Carmission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Site Layout: Layout could be improved by eliminating one entrance off of Starkey Road and one entrance off of Penn Forest Boulevard. An access aisle is needed on the north side of the property to connect the parking in front of the Country Store with the large rear parking lot to be located behind the Country Store. Clarification is needed with respect to the location of the large parking lot to the west of the petitioner's property. It appears on the concept plan that some of the spaces are partially on the adjoining property not owned by the petitioner. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. All construction will be in reasonable conformance to the Conceptual Plan submited herewith. b. The parcel requested to be Zoned M-1 will only be used for retail storage of paper, business forms and ccxnputer supplies. c. The Convenience Store sign proposed at the intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard will have a maximum sign area of 96 sq.ft. The total height will be 25' including structural supports. The bottom of the sign will be approximately 9' from the ground elevation. d. The use of the property will be limited to operation of a convenience store on parcel 1 and the operation of an office complex and storage building on parcels 2 and 3. d. There will be no outdoor billboard type signage on the property. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Jones, Witt, Winstead NAYS: Flippen, Gordon ABSENT: None b. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. One entrance on Penn Forest Boulevard and one entrance on Starkey Road is preferred. b. Planning Commission does not endorse parking even though concept plan proffered. Number of parking spaces shown on concept plan does meet zoning ordinance requirements. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Jo Hartl y, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Ccnmisssion i '~ i \ a ,a \ O O i ~. m •~~ A ~ ~ ' i^ O • ~ t \ o • o oQ, fr O O \ a d \ .~ c 8 ~~ 6 Rjj~~o ~ o pD 6~ ~ 3~ now v szs - w h Y 6 ',~ O O K Y < V Or< ohs s0~. s O~°s O~ =ham „~O ~ J O Y Z Y M t~ a :~ hgE r 0 z z ~h~ ti V r _? » Ya~~ s~OJ r~-` ow h YYh 6<t8 s' n~ w~Or ~, Yh0 iJUo M~s~ \ a~ o} d 0 `W ~ Q 4 h v ~./ = 4~ • J~ °~ `~d '$ o~ ' ^ o Y ' s C ~ x x O DC6~ R: a a 6~ ~~ e Z `> w w ~ a • ~ O o °C Y ~ Ni ~ o E 8 ~ s' ~ a o ~~ • ,fY i0 \\`\ \~ \ \ v \ ~ ~ \\ \Os \\\ _~ ~~~~ \ ~ ~ ~ A \ 6EIlNAaD 0~1YE w o g a Odl ~ d 7W \ ~\ ~ ~ \ ~\ ~ X~ ~f \ a ,~ ~ a ~ti ~ ~ i \ zy \~ :. ~ o OWE ~l0 ~ O` ~ ~ ~~WiO \\ \\\ r~S \\ ~" ~ - ~ ~ „ A ~ ~ / ~~ ~ ,r ~ ~O ~ \ J~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ` ` \ v ,, \ v,, , . ~ ~~ ~ ~,,G vc \ \ f ~ ~ rd~1i 1 ~ \\ ~ c~~ .O IDG ~y~~. ~ \ ~~ Y ~ i \\ ~ r~ Z~ D r (i~h~v \ \ i ` ?~ i ~ \ i I O ~ ' O ~ ~ Q 3 ~ OO ~ h ~; ~ d ? ~ V r i ~ ` Y lll hh ~~~ aaa ~ ~~~4 Syr ~~~ N \' . ~. ~ //i'Y 111 ',~ ' _ - ~- ROAD Sj AR~CEY PRO~pSED J ~'~3o r ~ " ~/ `~ ~ .,~ s °. 6` ^d ~. ;y ~- ~ O~ s iC7. "-.C `~W } 1+:. ~~ 5 °. r 4 ;~ W ° aZ e ~i~ pyf~ 1 a. ~ C F' 1 0 f ?~~- ~ N unoru 7 laz+a - _ ~-zp~ g ~ , -- ""' _ ,~,., ~ ~ 1 .. . ~ Foreef Blvd. ~. ~ ~ ~ $ -2~ z a. ~ -Z 2 0 Y 1 L _O ' 21 N 4 3 h 2' 5.02 a• 8 7 6 aaz'a ~ 8 ~ ~~° 24 z+~+ 20 b i ~ o is rr n 10 s ~ 3 K e tta 10O zxs-. zoo as ~ , ~ ~ 9 ~ II o R-'3 20 i ri zr ~o m +. ly ie~ in.+ IS 18 ~Oe aO 12 ' ~~I I7z a8 -. +. O ,z sos.x ~_I r .. 13 I P/0 87.06-I-44 ' ~'3 I " • 100' 1,s ~ Aso a + 17\~ '~~ ao a~ ' z ;, ~ 4` 14 w\ y ~zz •°' 4'i. N9i ~" S 7 e a 5, barsl 16 O Tj ~' 1.4 I At 14 y/ L~ 16 / ~~' 1.t1ac + O 1.09 Ac ID) 1.28 Ac IG k _' ROANOKE COUNTY Roger P. Jefferson r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT g-1 t0 B-2 & M-1 3 ~. ~ > ~=~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 45-11/87 REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER PETITIONER: ROGER P. JEFFERSON DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1987 Petition of Roger P. Jefferson to rezone a 1.35 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-2, Business and M-l, Industrial to construct a convenience store, additional office space, and a storage facility, located at the southwest intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF~REQUEST a. Conditional request to reconstruct an existing convenience store and to enlarge an existing office facility. These modifications are the result of an increased amount of business and the scheduled realignment of the intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe purpose more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 and M-1 zoning classifications permit a. wide variety of com- mercial and industrial uses. M-1 district limited to storage of paper,. business forms, and computer supplies which will be sold on premises. B-2 district not restricted by conditions of use. b. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Existing buildings and pavement. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Commun- ity Planning Area. Designated for stable future growth, current- ly served with urban services, commercial infill encouraged. b. General area is heavily developed with mixed office, commercial, institutional and residential uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. 4 ~ °f ~ ~~ ~~ Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use planning policies with the exception of Policy TR-7 which refers to limiting the frequency of driveway openings where possible. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map. Petitioner is proposing an encouraged land use type, a planned cluster of retail uses thereby fulfilling the following policies: preventing commercial sprawl, developing. retail uses in planned groupings of independent buildings, and enhancing the quality of highway frontage development with respect to signs, front yards, and building facades. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Primarily mixed commercial and office uses. Proposed development is primarily an expansion of existing commercial and office facilities. No additional negative impact on surrounding property anticipated. 2 c. Neighboring Area: No negative effect. See comment above. 4 d. Site Layout: Layout could be improved by eliminating one entrance off of Starkey Road and one entrance off of Penn Forest Boulevard. An access aisle is needed on the north side of the property to connect the parking in front of the Country Store with the large rear parking lot to be located behind the Country Store. Clarification is needed with respect.to the location of the large parking lot to the west of the petitioner's property. It appears on the concept plan that some of the spaces are partially on the adjoining property not owned by the petitioner. 2 e. Architecture: Existing convenience store will be demolished to accommodate relocation of the highways. The new store will reflect the "historic" integrity of the existing store which has served as a southwest county landmark for many years. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: After a preliminary review, petitioner does not have adequate parking as required by the zoning ordinance. There are two options: (1) A variance may be required from the BZA. (2) Petitioner may work with the staff to determine the exact amount of commercial floor space and the number of corresponding parking spaces needed. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed improvements to the site should not be discouraged at this time because of a possible parking shortage. 2 h. Natural Features: No negative impact. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: A total of 995 vehicles per day will be generated by the combined commercial and office uses. Of this amount, 774 vehicles will~be generated by the convenience store, the remainder will be generated by the office uses. Both businesses are currently in operation on the site. Starkey Road is scheduled to be widened; the intersection of Penn Forest Boulevard and Starkey Road is scheduled for reconstructioon. 4 j. Circulation: Note comments above in item d. UTILITIES ! ~r~-. 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No problems anticipated. All drainage will be handled adequately by the proposed road improvements. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: 1 TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: $750,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $4 million - Total Employees: 40 - Total revenue to the.County/Year: Approximately $50,000. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Convenience store sign will have a maximum height of 25 feet and a maximum width of 6 feet. Note the term "height" should be clarified with respect to total structure height or sign face height. Existing office signage will remain in effect. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's request is in conformance with the land use planning policies with the exception of Policy TR-7 (access). The petitioner's request is in conformance with the land use plan map. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Conforms with plan policies (except TR-7, access) and land use plan map. (2) Will allow for the reconstruc- tion of a heavily traveled dangerous intersection. (3) Will im- prove the site design of existing businesses. (4) Will allow for necesssary expansion and reconstruction of existing businesses. b. Weaknesses: (1) Number of entrances and exits onto Penn Forest Boulevard should be reduced. (2) Access between interior parking areas should be improved. (3) B-2 uses should be limited by proffer to allow proposed convenience store and office uses. (4) Signage proffer should be clarified. (5) Placement of parking spaces on adjoining property should be corrected if necessary. ` ~3 mot AYE. NAPS ABSENT• ~ ~ 1 0 4 ale co~~~~ Ro~o~~ 5 OF ~~¢~S~oR d' 1 E~~A~1o~ ~ g~S ~ lay' 1 c~~,1~ ~~ ~ el ° ~e~~ g~ ~ a'~ c it1 1 ~" ~ a~~e 4 a~ ire a.~d ~s armed e~ ¢°aa 1 ti4~1oc tia~~ . ~ 1 ~~11 Joao,, o ave S ari8 ~ /~, 3 1 ~~ •o co~~T o~ e~l~i ti e C ~lc~ , ~~'I o~ ~~. ~ ~a~ •~ O~o~~ ~ e~~'e~~ yon a 4 1 $~1 _ c e ~ey~rl~ t~'lal oiyt ce1 ~ ~ ~aa~pRe o ~g5 0,~ 4o~e~ 4 • Co~~i~ 4a~c ~, 3' ~ ~~ .~ le~e~ a5 ~ ~s o,~ o ~~~ '~ ~Q~RV Z5 R a~'~'i~g o~` Q a o~e ~Y'e Q Mag d 8 ~ ~ 5 41 ~'~ ~ code ~~ ~ a~'°Xe 4~'$~ • ~ci°~e~ ~,re lara ~z ~c~c se p1 go oho e~i ~o o~ Ala ~,~ • ~'re t~ 4 a~~ el it ~~ ~g~ ~oJ~ 5ec~e~ ced Qa~c yrg i W`~~¢~A5 ! tY' ire ekes ~, ~ $ .2 41a.~t~ 1 v~l .~ 1 ~ re 1~ d ae ce 2• .1 t file ado Qa~ cel 3 ~ ~ 3 • d ~° c~i°~ 1 ba' ~-re 4a~~cel e a,~8 e~~e Se ~v~ 2°ne ~o Ya c°~ ~,~ l ~e~ ed ~~ ld a s e ~ a ce a5 i~ bo ~~ic O °~ Qa~ o~ ~ eqJ did 5 0 ~ i t Oi t~S~~JC~y off` lei ° e Qe~it ~yce a~ ~e~ded ~ tle5 ~ co e c ~Y' ~o a a~ ~~o~a Eg~AS' e legal 95~~ a5 d all Q `~`~' ~~e~ d° is o~ 1 ~ ar reap leg d dve a ~, 9 ~' c ~ e'~ ~ricr ~ ~ v i~gy ~ 1 a~ p~~li read ~ a or ~ aft eo~5 o ~, e y i a i Code ~ 5 , a~ ~ ~yt~ ~o ~ C°~~le ~,~ 5a~'e~ 0~5 apt t~~R~p' °,~~~ ~ fiy~g Go~~ d~~y ~ o4p 41a o~ cow o~ded ao A5' ~,~,e e $oa~d ~o~~e~ed a~~ ~~~g$ d to ~Y' o ~~,e 4 ode ~ ~ h s eco~~e d ~ J~'ec o~ e aPQ~ ,~ ,ice ~~.. a N .--i w h_ O U 0 r a w 0 a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.263 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the inter- ) section of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard ) within the Cave Spring ) Page 1 of 2 FINAL ORDER Magisterial District, and ) 87.07-4-3 (Lot 3), recorded as parcel # 87.07-4-2 (Lot 2), 87.07-4-9 ( Pt . Got 9) , 87.07-4-4 (Lots 10 & 11B) & 87.07-4-11 (Lot 5 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Roger P. Jefferson did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- Parcel 1, B-1 referenced parcel of land from Parcel 2. B-1 Parcel 1, B-2 Parcel 3, B-1 District to Parcel 2, B-2 District for the purpose Parcel 3, M-1 of constructing a convenience store, office & storage complex. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on Nov. 5, 19 87, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with Proffer of Conditions on November 17, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel SEE DB 1272, PG 794; DB 1198, PG 1051 & ABOVE and recorded in Deed Book DB1194, PG OOOland legally described Parcel 1, B-1 below, be rezoned from Parcel 2, B-1 District to Parcel 1, B-2 Parcel 3, B-1 Parcel 2F R-7 District. Parcel 3, M-1 7 '-.-< .CT t~ t ~ ,r' _ Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: SEE ATTACHED: EXHIBIT A, Parcel 1 EXHIBIT B, Parcel 2 EXHIBIT C, Parcel 3 BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, ~TOhnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~-a~~"' ~' Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Arnold Covey, Director of DeveiopMent Review John Willey, Director of Real Estate Assessrlents Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning n u Roger P. Jefferson EXHIBIT A Parcel 1 Description of Parcel 1 to be Rezoned from Zoning District B-1 to Zoning District B-2 BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Starkey Road (formerly Route 119), said point being the corner between Lots 1 and 2 of the Map of Willow Dell Subdivision; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following the west side of Starkey Road, S. 3° 51' W. 54 feet to a point; thence continuing with Starkey Road, S. 8° 11' W. 66.4 feet to a point; thence continuing with Starkey Road, S. 11° 16' W. 13.8 feet to a point, corner to Lots 3 and 4 of said subdivision; thence leaving Starkey Road and following the line between Lots 3 and 4, then Lots 10 and 4, S. 84° 55' W. 243.9 feet to the rear corner of Lot 10 and Lot 4 of said subdivision; thence with an existing boundary line through Lot 11 of said subdivision, S. 85° 00' W. 15 feet to a point; thence N. 5° 00' W. 128.2 feet to a point on the south side of the Old Floyd Road; thence N. 85° 00' E. 15.0 feet to the front corner between Lots 10 and 11 of said subdivision; thence crossing the Old Floyd Road, N. 85° 00' E. 20.1 feet to a point; thence N. 55° 10' E. 46.7 feet to a point, corner to Got 1 of said subdivision; thence with the line between Lot 10 and Got 1 and Lot 3 and Lot 1 and Lot 2 and Lot 1, S. 89° 21' E. 211.0 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and being all of Lots 2, 3 and 10 and a portion of Lot 11 of Willow Dell Subdivision and containing 0.878 acre and being all of the property acquired by Roger P. Jefferson in Deed Book 1194, Page 001 and Deed Book 1198, Page 1051 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. And excepting a strip 25 foot wide along the northerly boundary of Lots 2 and 3 known as the Floyd Road Drive. And there is reserved along the northerly side of Got 10 and the 15 foot strip designated New 3A a 30 foot strip for a roadway. n Roger P. Jefferson EXHIBIT B Parcel 2 Description of Parcel 2 to be Rezoned from Zoning District B-1 to Zoning District B-2 BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Starkey Road (formerly Route 119), said point being the common corner between Lots 4 and 5 of Willow Dell Subdivision; thence leaving said point of Beginning and following the west side of Starkey Road, S. 13° 21' W. 75.6 feet to a point, corner to Lots 5 and 6; thence between Lots 4 and 5, S. 83° 51' W. 84.0 feet to a point; thence with a new zoning line through Lot 5, N. 5° 24' W. 72.69 feet to a point on the line of Gots 4 and 5; thence with a line between Lots 4 and 5, N. 84° 36' E. 108.29 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and being Parcel 2 containing 0.159 acre. 10 Roger P. Jefferson EXHIBIT C Parcel 3 Description of Parcel 3 to be Rezoned from Zoning District B-1 to Zoning District M-1 BEGINNING at a point on the common line between Lots 5 and 6 of Willow Dell Subdivision, said Point of Beginning being, S. 83° 51' W. 84.0 feet from the common front corner of Lots 5 and 6 of said subdivision, said point fronting on Starkey Road; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between Gots 5 and 6, S. 83° 51' W. 106.40 feet to common corner between Lots f 5, 6, 8 and 9; thence with the line between Lots 8 and 9, S. 85° 00' W. 18.61 feet to a point; thence with a new zoning line through Lot 9, N. 5° 24' W. 79.26 feet to a point; thence with another new zoning line through Got 9 and Lot 4 of said subdivision, N. 84° 36' 00" E. 125.00 feet to a point; thence with another new zoning line and adjoining Parcel 2, S. 5° 24' E. 78.0 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and being Parcel 3 containing 0.226 acre. ii r- ~ • co N ~--~ F-- w 0 U 0 F- Q 0 L~J O a 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ~ ~i ~~ ~- "Cj ,r VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.2b3 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the inter- ) section of Starkey Road and ) Penn Forest Boulevard ) within the Cave Spring ) PROFFER OF CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) 87.07-4-2, recorded as parcel # 87.07-4-3 ) 87.07-4-4, 87.07-4-5, 87.07-4-9 & 87.07-4-11 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Roger P. Jefferson hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: All construction will be in reasonable conformance to the Conceptual Plan submitted herewith. The parcel requested to be Zoned M-1 will only be used for retail storage of paper, business forms and computer supplies. The Convenience Store sign proposed at the intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard will have a maximum sign area of 9b square feet. The total height of the sign will be 25 feet including structural supports. The bottom of the sign will be approximately 9 feet from the ground elevation. The use of the property will be limited to operation of a convenience store on Parcel 1 and the operation of an office complex and storage building on Parcels 2 and 3. The owner will make no requests for or allow the construction of billboard type signs on Parcel 1, Parcel 2 or Parcel 3. ctfully submi ted, Petit oner L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Roger P. Jefferson, requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business and M-1 Industrial of a tract containing 1.35 acres and located at the southwest intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a covenience store, additional office space, and a storage facility. The County Planning Commission will review the petition on November 5, 1987. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 29th day of October, 1987. `~'~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, November 3, 1987 Tuesday, November 10, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: John T. Parker T. P. Parker & Son P.O. Box 39 Salem, Virginia 24153 PETITIONER: M.T. HOLDING CQNIPANY CASE N[A~IBER: 46-11/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 5, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 17, 1987 1. R~UEST Petition of M.T. Holding Company to rezone a portion of a 0.56 acre parcel from B-2, Business to M-l, Industrial to operate an autcmobile repair business located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. The proposed use is not an encouraged land use type but does conform to Policy C-2 (access to an arterial), Policy C-4 (coordinated site design-shared vehicular access), and Policy C-5 (effective screening and buffering). The precedent established by other rezoning and land use decisions is that autanobile repair is a light manufacturing use. The Principal Industrial land use classification states that small industries such as the one proposed must serve a very localized market area. These types of industry may be permitted to a limited extent outside of the Principal Industrial areas. Particular attention should be given to whether the petititioner's business serves a localized market, i.e., southwest county. b. Noise: Possible negative noise impact to surrounding businesses. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. The M-1 use is limited to an automotive repair shop only in the existing structure. b. There will be no outside parking of nonoperable vehicles at the time the business is closed. c. No outside storage of materials. d. No stand alone sineage. Sign will be part of existing sign structure. e. Garage will not operate on Sunday or after 9 p.m. on other days. f. If no longer used as auto repair, will revert to B-2. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATrACHMEN'I'S ~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") / Staff Report Other: Jon H ley, Alter to Secretary Roano County Planning Coirnnission F ~ D LAND COMPANY I • D.D. flbb 44. 1b4 i Oh, N N 580000' E -~ ~ °" ,.: _ - - ,.o 90.00' cn ^C o I Fe~K 0.561 0 0 WADO CORPORATION ACRE O. D.B. 1198 P4.144 ~ sT.3• DELOIS FERGUSON rn ' AS/NALT PVM'l. t i - _ s~.o• N 1 00 0 ; • 10 • a , _ . cA o `~' ~- 5 590000 W WA00 CORPORATION ~ ~N D.B. 1198 P4. 144 O s.s a IN 3 ~ O ROSEN6URG m Io. FAMILY O - •" ~ FUKO _ I ~ ~ D.D.IIBb 44.98 N 1 rn M 1 vn I I Z v~.v' Ix AS4NAlT v -VM'T. I6. 1 6` ___ 80.00' ~ _ _ !. ST _ _ _ ~ 10.18 _ _ ~Z 1 " ' "~ ' ~OR141NAL STREET 1.1NE - RouTE Y 9 - N 5a Ob 00 BRAMBLETON AVENUE 80' R f W (U. S. ROUTE 221 LEGEND S~ALTyU SURVEYID PROPERTY LINE ~a FD ~ -• - • -SURVEYED TIE LINE -P_ ;`O - - - - DEED LINE w ~' V PHILIP W. H:SI:it O FOUND IRON ~ l' • /,~~jR1R~/7~ vY~~ O SL•-r IRON REBBAR 1398 - oT -OVERHEAD TELEP110NE 9 O~ SHADING DL'VOTES CONCRETE ~0 SURVEy , . UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - EXACT LOCATION UNKNOIJN !, SCALE 1"-50' ' No~rES 1. REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 1156 PAGE 3i4 SURVEY FOR: Z. TAX REFERL•'NCE: 77.09-4-47 M. T. HOI.OING COMPANY 3. PROPERTY NOT IN 11UU FLOOD HAZARD 'LONE. 3639 BRMU3LETON AVENUE ~ CARVE SPRING lIACISTERIAI, DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SURVEYED APRIL 29, 1986 JOB MIPBiER 60342 B I1A17.ER AND AtiAO(:IATf•:C, IN(:., If. F. (:OLLIi(:E :1\'f•TTq:, FALF,FI, ViRG]NIA 2415'1 ~ z. 2 n .~ s • i. ~: s t 2 i f .c ! _. ... ... ~ t~~~- D unoTu AN k ' ROANOKE COUNTY ,~.~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ~, M. T. Holding Company B-2 to M-1 ~ ~~ -;oN~ ,~- ..~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 46-11/87 PETITIONER: M.T. HOLDING COMPANY REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER~~ DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1987 Petition of M.T. Holding Company to rezone a 0.56 acre parcel from B-2, Business to M-l, Industrial to operate an automobile repair business located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone an existing one story building consisting of approximately 2,000 sq.ft. for the purpose of operating an automobile repair business. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. M-1 use has been limited to that of an automobile repair shop. No additions will be made to the structure. b. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Existing building and pavement. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area. Designated for stable future growth, urban services available, commercial infill encouraged. b. General area is densely developed with a mix of office and commercial uses. Property adjoins Brambleton Avenue, a heavily traveled primary highway. Rear of the property is separated from nearby residential subdivision by moderate slope and tree cover. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of l~through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. The proposed use is not an encouraged land use type but does conform to 4 Policy C-2 (access to an arterial), Policy C-4 (coordinated site design-shared vehicular access), and Policy C-5 (effective screening and buffering). The precedent established by other rezoning and land use decisions is that automobile repair is a light manufacturing use. The Principal Industrial land use classification states that small industries such as the one proposed must serve a very localized market area. These types of industry may be permitted to a limited extent outside of the Principal Industrial areas. Particular attention should be given to whether the petitioner's business serves a localized market area, i.e., southwest county. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Intensely developed commercial, specifically retail service such as hardware store, video rental and a pizza delivery. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Mixed office, commercial, and densely developed single family detached housing. 2 d. Site Layout: Existing building and driveway to be unchanged. 2 e. Architecture: Existing block building to be unchanged. Building is to the rear of several other buildings and is not readily visible from the street. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. ? g. Amenities: Adequate parking. 2 h. Natural Features: No effect. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Improvements to Brambleton Avenue almost complete. Proposed use will generate fewer than 50 vehicles per day. A typical B-2 use would probably generate more traffic than the proposed use. ? j. Circulation: No problems noted by Engineering Department. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 10 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No problems noted. Drainage will be accommodated by Brambleton Avenue improvements. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: S ..._.•' TAX BASE ~ ~ ~ r'~" "~' 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $180,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not available - Total Employees: Fewer than 5 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $2,000/year (real property tax only) ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 4 w. Noise: Possible negative noise impact to surrounding businesses. 2 x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered no stand alone signage. Sign will be a part of the existing sign structure. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. The proposed land use type is not an encouraged use within this land use category. However, the proposal does conform with policies C-2, C-4 and C-5. Small industries such as the proposed use may be permitted to a limited extent outside the Principal Industrial areas if it is proven that a very localized market area is being served. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Existing building situated at the rear of the property and is not visible from the street or surrounding properties. (2) Direct access to arterial highway. (3) No impact to nearby residential property (unless noise is generated). b. Weaknesses: (1) Land use type is not encouraged within the Core land use category. (2) Staff suggests that proffer pertaining to vehicle parking be reworded as follows: there will no outdoor, overnight parking of customers' vehicles (licensed or unlicensed) after closing each day. (3) Unless petitioner can assert a local market area, previous precedent established by Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors, and the Roanoke County Circuit Court would severely discourage the approval of this request. (4) Possible noise generation should be considered. 6 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: ) FINAL ORDER ----- ----- parcel of land containing 6300 ) square feet, generally located at the ) rear of 3936 Brambleton Avenue, within ) the Windsor Hills Magisterial District,) and recorded as the rear portion of ) Parcel#77.09-4-47 in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General Commercial i~ cr District to M-1, Light Industrial District, for the purpose of operating an automotive repair shop. ~7 ~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on November 5, 1987, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as a portion of Parcel #77.09-4-47 ^5TERNOUDT, FERGLISON NATT, AHERDN & P.GEE and I e a I I described be I ow be rezoned f rom B-2, Genera I ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW g Y i ROANOKE, VIRGINIA zaD,a-,699 Commercial District to M-1, Light Industrial District. 7 BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of the property of ~VADO Corporation (Deed Book 1198, Page 144); thence N. 58° 00' E. 90.00 feet to a point; thence S. 32° 00' E. 70.00 feet to a point; thence S. 58° 00' W. 90.00 feet to a point; thence N. 32° 00' W. 70.00 feet to a point. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor seconded by Supervisor Nickens Brittle and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYES: None ABSENT: None ~~ DeputLZy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATT D R N EY G-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1fi99 CC: Arnold Covey, Director of Development Revenue John Willey, Director of Real Estate Assessments Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning 8 VIRGINIA : ~ ~ ~ ~~':.„ k.:.~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: A parcel of land, containing 6300 square feet, generally located at the rear of 3936 Brambleton Avenue, within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as the rear portion of Parcel #77.09-4-47 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. SE_CO_ND AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: v L>'~ °,~' ^5TERH000T, FERGU50N NATT, AHERCIN & AGEE ATTCI!? tJ EY5-AT-LAW RCIAN~KE, VIRGINIA 24019-1699 Being iri accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. (1) The M-1 use is limited to an automotive repair shop only in the existing structure. No additions will be made to the structure. (2) There will be no outdoor overnight parking of customers' vehicles (licensed or unlicensed) after closing each day with the exception of vehicles left by customers after closing hours. (3) No outside storage of materials. (4) No stand alone sineage. Sign will be part of existing sign structure. (5) There will be no business operation after 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and no business II operation on Sunday. 9 i ,~` (6) The zoning will revert to B-2 zoning should the use as an automotive repair shop be terminated. Respectfully submitted, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY By_ ~~~ ~.~_____ Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron ~ Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner r1.e10.c OSTERHGUGT, FERGUSUN N ATT, AHERON & AGEE ATT^RPIEYS-AT-LAW RGANOKE, VIRGINIA 24GtE)-Ib99 10 C~nixn~~ oaf ~o~tnuke DEPARTMENT O F DEVELOPMENT Povember 6, 1937 Mrs. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & 4Jorld News P.O. Box 2491 Roanoke, VA 24010 Dear Mrs. Plank: PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPc.A LS Please make a change in our legal notice advertising P•1.T. Holding's rezoning request for the November 17, 1937 Board of Supervisor's public hearinn. The ad is scheduled to appear in the evening edition on Tuesday, '`lovember 10, 1937. In the first paragraph, sixth line, please insert the words "portion of a" after of a. The sixth line should read "from B-2 Cusiness to t•1-1 Industrial of a portion of a tract containing 0.56 acre and." Thank you. If you have any questions, please contact Liz Parcell at 772-2094. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk P. O. BOX 3800 ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA 24015 (703) 772-2069 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of M.T. Holding Company requesting rezoning from B-2 Business to M-1 Industrial of a tract containing 0.56 acre and located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to operate an automobile repair business. The County Planning Commission will review the petition on November 5, 1987. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 29th day of October, 1987. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, November 3, 1987 Tuesday, November 10, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Ed Natt Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt P.O. Box 20068 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: ) RECOMMENDATION -------------- A parcel of land containing 6300 ) square feet, generally located at the ) rear of 3936 Brambleton Avenue, within ) the Windsor Hills Magisterial District,) and recorded as the rear portion of ) Parcel#77.09-4-47 in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General Commercial District to M-1, Light Industrial District for the purpose of operating an automotive repair shop. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning ^STERHDIIDT, FERGIJSON NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA aaDla-ie~9 Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on November 5, 1987; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors ~: ,, A P P E A R AN C E~ R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS : 33J~ ~TD~e~I eti G P PHONE : '' c~..I~a7 PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E .R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) --- --T A P P E A R A N C~E •R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 l/ ~~ --~' PUBLIC HEARING ON C.-~'• :;~ 2 ~"''' '/' / ;<>'~'`~' ~'~= -_~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- NAME : ~.~ '"' --i ADDRESS : ~ S ~~ ~~ ~, PHONE : '~ ~ __ ~I ~~ ~' `~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E .R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~/~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ,~ , ~ VYfrJ2fj~/ ADDRESS : ZS Z Z ~~,~/UN;~/~ ff~~ PHONE : 3 yy- ~~y~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three-and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE : ~Q,~ - 9~7 .. ®~ ~ C/ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) O~ POANp'YF ti •~ ~ z G~ v a~ 1$ E5~ 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P'~ A Beauti/u/Beginning CnII~tn~~ Uf ~n~triAkP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN October 19 1 9 8 7 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News P. O. Box 2041 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Ms. Plank: Please publish as a legal advertisement the attached resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, October 13, 1987. Publish in both the morning and evening editions on the following dates: Tuesday, October 27, 1987 Tuesday, November 3,1987 Please bill the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, .lam - Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 A P P E A R A t~' C E, PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~ R E Q U E S T c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to ru ,Q,yv~ ~(-S - recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r NAME : u C ~ 1l1./ ~ II ~ ~ ~~ ADDRESS : a y~/ s~~ ~~©u ~~e ~~~. 'y c~ PHONE : ~ ~~ ~ (l~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ,~---~---d---~--e~ -~'L.~ ~J A P P E A R A Ivy C E, R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON 17VI~ ~ U ~' ~ ~UV~+-'~~' ~~ ~t`^ S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY ,vAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ~ ~ u~`1 ~ ~11'~~I`1 ADDRESS : C.P ) I A ~~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' PHONE: ~ ~~ ~`~ ~ 7 ~cZ`~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R ANC E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I ~ ' I ,~ ~ 4 I~ GL/~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: ~-r-~ ~i ~~~ T~~~ ~ `~ l ~7 t PHONE : ~ ~ .} ..~ ~,,~ ~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~n I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO ''rHE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~(~~Y~o„ W~c~ `M 5 - ADDRESS : 8 C~ ~ ~ a 1 h2U O 1L PHONE : ~~-~ - ~ ~ 8 S~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N~ C E J R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON GU~C.L~~ ~ ~,~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~~~ ~• ADDRESS: ~ ~~ PHONE : ~~G~ s7` ~~/ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E ~Y PUBLIC HEARING ON ( I R E Q U E S T Q-~~ jL t i 1'Y1 ~' ~ t- ~ .`~ ~' i? I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : (_~ ~ ~') ( . ~ I ~ ~ ~ t< ~ ~~ ADDRESS: PHONE : ~ ~ ~~ _ %J~ ~s^ l_ J PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Charter Amendments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It is recommended that the County request the 1988 General Assembly to amend its existing charter. The three proposed amend- ments are as follows: 1. Amend Section 2.02 to authorize a meals tax and a tobacco tax; 2. Amend Chapter 8 to create a new Section 8.03 to autho- rize the creation of the office of license inspections, which would authorize the enforcement of the County license ordinance through the issuance of tickets or summons by officials in the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue; 3. Amend Section 9.03 to authorize the appointment of mem- bers of the Board of Zoning Appeals by the Board of Supervisors. Section 15.1-835 of the Code of Virginia states the proce- dure for amending an existing charter. The required legal notice was published in the newspaper on November 6, 1987. The required public hearing is scheduled for November 17, 1987. The proposed amendments are attached to this report for re- view by the Board. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adop- tion of the proposed amendments and adopt the prepared resolu- tion. /' off? ,.- > ,~_ Respectfully submitted, q,,~~, ''w'~ ~'Yvt~~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred To ( ) Motion by: ( ) ( ) ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO AMEND THE CHARTER FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitution of Virginia, and Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the General Assembly to grant a governmental charter to a county or to amend an existing charter; and WHEREAS, the 1986 General Assembly granted Roanoke County a charter, as found in the 1986 Acts of Assembly, Chapter 617; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds that certain amendments thereto are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of the County, and for more efficient and effective local government; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has complied with the provisions of Section 15.1-835 of the Code of Virginia, and has held a public hearing on these proposed charter amendments on November 17, 1987, after due legal notice, at which the citizens had the opportunity to be heard concerning these proposed charter amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby requested to amend the charter for Roanoke County, Virginia. These charter amendments for Roanoke County are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for submission as a bill for consideration by the General Assembly. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ANIQIDMQ~IrS TD CHARTF~2 FOR ROANOKE CIXJNI'Y Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and specifically Section 15.1-835, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby gives notice of a public hearing to be held on November 17, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia so that the citizens of Roanoke County shall have an opportunity to comment upon the County's request that the 1988 General Assembly amend its existing charter. An informative summary of the proposed charter amendments is as follows: Section 2.02 Taxing Powers Section 8.03 Office of License Inspections Section 9.03 Board of Zoning Appeals 0 'V`,• Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Publish on the following date in the morning edition: November 6, 1987 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ~` ~..,' tl~i9-ehe~te~-~e-eetugtp-shell-net-levy-arty-tam-e~-tebaeee-p-~edr~ets-a~-r~eal9 lnelading- Hari-aleel~el3e- 19e~aer?ege9 ; - atl~er=- tl~ari- ti~eee--tees-9geelallp et~~er•leeel-lt;-~P1t~58-l-ef -thl9-Fade In addition to the other powers conferred by law, the County of Roanoke shall have the power to impose, levy, and collect, in such manner as its board may deem expedient, a consumer or subscriber tax at a rate or rates not exceeding those authorized by general law upon the amount paid for the use of gas, electricity, telephone, and any other public utility service within the county, or upon the amount paid for any one or more of such public utility services, and may provide that such tax shall be added to and collected with bills rendered consumers and subscribers for such services. ~ 8.03. Office of License Inspection.--The commissioner of the revenue, upon the concurrence of the board of supervisors, shall have the authority to create an office of license inspection and the board may establish by ordinance such rules and regulations as it deems exp edient for the operation of such office. This office shall have the power to investigate and enforce the ordinances of the county, with regard to licenses and license taxes, review any and all records of the commissioner of the revenue, other than income tax returns, and examine and audit the books of all persons, firms, and corporations which it has reasonable cause to believe to be liable for payme nt of any license levied by the county. This office shall have the power and authorit y to issue a summons or notice of a hearing in the general district court of the county for any violation of a license ordinance. ~ 2.02. Taxing powers.--In addition to the powers granted by other sections of this charter and general law, the county shall have the power to raise annually by taxes and assessments, as permitted and limited by general law, in the county such sums of money as the board of supervisors shall deem necessary to pay the debts and defray the expenses of the county in such manner as the board of supervisors shall deem expedient. In addition to, but not as a limitation upon, this general grant of power the county shall have power to levy and collect ad valorum taxes on real estate and tangible personal property and machinery and tools; to levy and collect taxes for admission to other charge for any public amusement, entertainment, performance, exhibition, sport or athletic event in the county, which taxes may be added to and collected with the price of such admission or other charge; to levy and collect taxes on hotel and motel rooms not to exceed two percent of the amount charged for the occupancy thereof; to levy and collect taxes on the sale of tobacco products; to levy and collect taxes on the sale of meals, including non-alcoholic beverages; to levy and collect privilege taxes, local general retail sales and use taxes as provided by law; unless prohibited by law, to require license, prohibit the conduct of any business, profession, vocation or calling without such license, require taxes to be paid on such licenses in respect of all businesses, professions, vocations, and callings not exempted by prohibition of general law; to franchise any business or calling so as to protect the public interest; and to require licenses of all owners of vehicles of all kinds for the privilege of using the streets and other public places in the county, require taxes to be paid on such licenses and prohibit the use of streets, alleys and other public places in the county without such license; p~a~~ded- netwitl~tar~ding- any- eer~trary--prev~eiex-e€ ~ 9.03. Board of Zoning Appeals.--There shall be a board of zoning appeals eppe~~ee1- e9- pi°e~ieled- bp- end with those powers granted by and consistent with general law. The board of supervisors shall appoint a board of zoning appeals, which shall consist of five (5) members, each to be appointed fora term of five (5) years , so that the term of one member shall expire each year . Members are removable for cause by the appointing authority. 3 ~ 1 VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE TH;~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Or^ ROANOKE COUNTY ~+l... A .1.35 acre parcel of land, ~-~'. .r'~, ~"" ' .. ~~ ~~: generally located at the inter- ) ~ ' ~- ~.~~ section of Starkey Road and Penn ~~ _ ` ~ ~ .s'iTs. i~? r orest Boulevard ) d ~~ ~' ~.; 9.. 1,. within the Cave Spring ) `'~, ~~, 1~ETITION ~~ ;'' Magisterial District, and ) _~_,,:'~ + 87.07-4-2, recorded as parcel # 137.07-~-3, ) 57.07-~-4,87.07-4-5, 87.07-4-9& 87.07-4-11 in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Roger P. Jefferson ~~~ /J ~ / G ~ respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code cr Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully showr_he following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance ~v B-1 District. 3) The property is desigraa*e~3 Tranaition in the Fut~.:r.e Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County ComprehensivQ Development Plan. 4) You}- Petitioner now desires Ycs have this property rezoned as B-2 & ~9-1 District for the purpose of construction of an Office Park and Convenience Stare. Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, r ~ .. ~ Petitioner ~ ;~ y.~ ._ OSTERHDIJDT, FERGIJSON NATT, ANERON & AGEE ATTDRNEY5-AT-LAN RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D18-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY IN RE: ) PETITION A 0.56 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 3936 Brambleton ) Avenue, within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel #77.09-4-47 in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY, respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I. The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-2, General Commercial District. 3. The property is designated Core in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4. Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as M-1, Light Industrial District for the purpose of operating an automotive repair shop. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, M. T. HOLDING COMPANY gy- ~~~~~%~_C~ri~---------- Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire. Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner DSTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAN RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D18-1b99 2 r>!)~~I_ ISM{t:.~+ S r'_.: - ? ::~.`~E; h'~A'i~Kf.: Ci~l''TY i"~i:AF E, .'F- ~JI':., 'Ji chic C I T Y is t= F? C ~a'~ii' K; rt~F~II`AVIT r:~f ??J:~LIC:?TI+s'.^ I, (T F-c E1^~;?f~ ;l G~':E:,~~) ~~d ~~f=f=IC t:~ Via= T ; ^1 ~ S -;~; l'r~. 'E U !; ~'~~ ~(: ~=~ T I ,_ ~ f ~oiF! I C ti Ct:- ~-- C'~- r .~,,. I_~ t. 1. ,L1 ~ri~`- :;~ Tt{G_ F:(~AP~I~ ~_ T I ''=1 ~ 5 ~. r' ~~a s t.? -':''a ~ s S t '. i L Y ?W ~', +'' S P +'~ P r :.l E3L.I~'i:.1~ ;;, ~.;': :=n,Er I''~ T'-iE STATE: ?F . i 1 ';. r ~ r r (( r' T T ~ Y ~ I j f` ~' T.. I_; ` M1 f ~ !l „T c a r r,. cT i ~,~ ~ rp..1-c ~l l ? 7 I ~. ?. ~ r ~ ..) ~ ~_~ 'r , ~ I 1 : ~ ~ . n I . a _) : i l - 'a i.. ~l i V ~ _ ~ J t . ._ _ ,,; I T t~; ~, S , T ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ T ~. t ,,^i `/ `" ~. Fy U V ~- rq Ei ~: E 1 ~ s~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING M,R AMENDMENTS TO , CHARTER k FOR ROANOKE COUNTIY Pursuant fo the provisions"of Chapter 17 of Tltla 1S_i of fhe 1950 Cods of VIr0lnia, as amended, end spseificsjlly Seetton 15.1.895, the Board.,of Supervisors of Roanoke Coun- ty, Vlr0inla, hereby Oives ho- flee of a public hesrinp to be held on November 17, 1987, of 7:00 ~,ln. Roanoke County Administration Gnfer 3738 Brambleton AverMe, Roanoke, VIr0lnle sys so that the citizens of Roaa~i County shell have an opp0 u- nity to comment upon • e County's request that the General Assembly amenddfs exlstln0 charter. ~r An informative summery of4M proposed charter am~d- ments Is es follows: Section 2.0~ Taxinp Powers L Section 8.03 OHlee of License Inspections °~^ Section 9.03 Board of ZonlnO Appealf Paul M. Mahoney CounfyANorney (18069) R~3AN~K~ TI;n~ES ~ WGPL~-N~{~S ~~// 7/~ AL NIJMREI' - 1I ~2I8354 PURL iSHEf~' S FEE - ~Lt~l.fl4 ©WA~U A MATT i9 i4 EI.cCTPIC RU Sid ~;~~ANi,KE VA 2431 $ STATE ~E VIRGIPdIA S IT Y F f~.{~AN~iCI A~FII)AViT U~ PU~LICATi'.~N I, fTHE UN~ERSi~NE(~) AN E~f=I=ICE~ ~I" i IP",ES-'~iC'F~Lt3 C~~?~1F~ATiG"3, ~dHiC~i C~'P.- P,~kA.7iCN IS P'J~LISHEk ~F THE ~:~AN~KE T I~1ES L WCRL~~-NEWS, A ?DAILY NEW SP APES'°. U8L ISHEU I ~a RGAiVG~tC E, I N THE STATE UE VIRGINIA, U~ GEPTIFY THAT THE ANN EXEC VUT IC.c ',hAS PU!~L IS~iE'~ Ifi SAi~ "JchSP11PEP5 GN 7HE Fi'LL~wIiV; UAT>~S LEGAL NOTICE I I. ~ U 3 I ~ ~ EV F~~ I ~~ G Notice is hereby Oiven to all in- terested Dersons that the I I ~ 1 i) ~ ~} 7 ~ V ~ ~~ I Ae G Roanoke County Bosrd of Su- rvisors will hold a public pe hearing at 7:00 P•rn• on Tues- day, November 17, 1987, In the +~ITNESSs THIS I.ITH DAY ~E N~VtBEP I.9f37 community Room at the Roanoke County Administra- _ ~ ~ ~ ,~}//, ~ lion Center, 3798 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Vir- ginia, on the Petition of M. T. tin ' .- ~ _._._-.._-._ - ~' XL~~1! __._ g Holding ComPenY reques rezonln9 from B-2 Business to '1~, ~~ I r ~~ 8 S S I ~. TUB ~ M-1 Industrial of a tract con- taining 0.56 acre and located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in Windsor Hills Magisterial the District. Rezoning has been requested to operate en automobile repair business. The County Plan- ning Commission will review the Petition on November 5, 1987. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well ' ~ ~ as a copy of the petition, site d todthis requestnmay be l P e a examined in the office of the Department of Development, located In Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center. Roanoke County will Provide as- slstenee to handicaDPed per- sons desiring to attend Public hearings. Sueh Individuals ere requested fo contact the Coun- l 1 ovl- 772-2p181f spacial Pr 7~) sions are necessary for atten- dance. Given under my hand this 29th day of October, 1987. Mary H. Allen, DePUty Clerk Roanoke County Board of SuDervlsors (18354) Cash Disbursement Files in Data Safe Box